The URL can be used to link to this page

2007 04-19• e REVISED 4/18/07 _. j;-' c~~r~ ae ;' MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING ~;~ ~t 4 ~. ~Y11c~"~ ~ REGULAR MEETING ~ rc~~oHO /~ AGENDA ~~~ 1~,~~~ City Council Chambers 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. ~~~~ "Although the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony, ,~ `~ all presentations before the Mayor and City Council are expected to be truthful and honest to best of the ability of the presenter." 1. Roll-call Attendance: X Tom O'Brien _O Wendy Newton-Huckabay David Moe X Steve Siddoway X Michael Rohm -chairman 2. Adoption of the Agenda: Approve as Amended r:_ 3. Consent Agenda: A. Approve Minutes of March 15, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting: Approve 4. ontinued Public Hearing from March 15, 2007: CUP 07-001 Request or Conditional Use Permit for an 11,000 square foot multi-tenant retail ~ ~-` ~ uilding on .75 acres in a C-G Zone for Jamaca Me Tan by Darren Blaser T North of East Fairview Ave and West of Hickory Ave in Lot 3, Block 1, of I'IJlallane Subdivision: Approve .~ , 5. Continued Public Hearing from March 15, 2007: CUP 07-003 Request - for a Conditional Use Permit for apublic/quasi-public use in an I-L zone for .~oint School District No 2. Jabil Subdivision by Joint School District No ~`` 2 -1303 E. Central Drive: Approve 6. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-004 Request for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to :-. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - April 19, 2007 Page 1 of 4 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. • REVISED 4/18/07 change the land use designation from Industrial to Commercial for Jabil East Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the Joint School District No. 2 - ~ 1303 E. Central Drive (Lot 1, Block 1, Jabil Subdivision): Recommend Approval to City Council 7. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: RZ 07-005 Request fora Rezone of 9.21 acres from I-L to a C-G zone for Jabil East Property by the Joint School District No. 2 - 1303 E. Central Drive (Lot 1, Block 1, Jabil Subdivision): Recommend Approval to City Council 8. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-005 Request for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to change the land use designation from Industrial to Commercial for Jabil West Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the City of Meridian Planning Department - 915 E. Central Drive (Lot 2, Block 1, Jabil Subdivision): Recommend Approval to City Council 9. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-001 Request for ~ a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Future Land Use Map designation from Industrial to Commercial for the property located at 600 E. Franklin Road for Thomas Comprehensive Plan Amendment by ~;. Lynn Thomas -north of E. Franklin Road and east of Meridian Road: ~,,~ Recommend Approval to City Council 10. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: RZ 07-002 Request for a Rezone of 0.628 of an acre from I-L to C-G zone for the Lynn Thomas >::' S Property by Lynn Thomas -north of E. Franklin Road and east of Meridian Road: Recommend Approval to City Council 11. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-003 Request to "~w amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map by adding and { ~ amending pathway locations for the Pathways Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Department: .~ Recommend Approval to City Council :: 12. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-002 Request to -amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map for the south Meridian area to expand future land uses designations to include the land ''°` east of McDermott Road south to Lake Hazel Road and '/2 mile east of .{.ti Linder Road south to'/2 mile south of Columbia Road, east to'/4 mile west of Cloverdale Road for South Meridian Area Comprehensive Plan :~ Amendr'hent by the City of Meridian Planning Department: Continue Public Hearing to November 1, 2007 Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - April 19, 2007 Page 2 of 4 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. . " Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, ~~,;; please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. ~~ ~,.z.~w ,; ~, „ ~,...~ . 4 ,:.dr ~ .?' 4ns 5 ;x ~ , ti,~ ~, ,, ~.. _ ~., i _ `i.'' ~ S i ~i .'- ~: `, f r J, . ;~ ~ ~., e r ~ ~ ~i _- F e. ~~. P~" t ' p . -. • REVISED 4/18/07 13. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-009 Request for a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment to add 4 new designations to the Future Land Use Map and include residential uses in neighborhood centers for South Meridian Area by City of Meridian Planning Department: Continue Public Hearing to November 1, 2007 14. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-007 Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map for the future Ten Mile Interchange area to modify various future land uses designations and to create several new future land use designations for the Ten Mile Area Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the City of Meridian Planning Department -generally bordered by Linder Road to the east, McDermott Road to the west, the Union Pacific Railroad Line to the north and '/2 mile south of -Overland Road to the south: Recommend Approval to City Council 15. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-008 Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan by adding the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan as an addendum to the Comprehensive Plan for the Ten Mile Specific Area Plan Text by the City of Meridian Planning Department -generally bordered by Linder Road to the east, McDermott Road to the west, the Union Pacific Railroad Line to the north and '/~ mile south of Overland Road to the south: Recommend Approval to City Council 16. Continued Public Hearing from March 15, 2007: PP 07-006 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 7 single family residential building lots and 2 common area lots on 1.96 acres in an R-4 zone for Moose Creek -~ ~ Subdivision by Moose Creek Construction - 4275 N. Jones Creek Lane: Continue Public Hearing to June 7, 2007 17. Public Hearing: CUP 07-004 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a bar, the Busted Shovel, in the O-T zone for the Busted Shovel by William Kosterman - 704 Main Street: Approve 18. Public Hearing: RZ 07-006 Request for a Rezone of 4.38 acres from an R-8 to an R-15 zone for Bellabrook by J.E. Development, LLC - 300 S. Locust Grove Road: Recommend Approval to City Council >~ 19. Public Hearing: CUP 07-005 Request for a Conditional Use Permit ,;~r,~l approval for multi-family residential use in a proposed R-15 zone for ,,. fi ~, ~ .k `'t. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - April 19, 2007 Page 3 of 4 ^`,~ #3-~ All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ~~~~;i Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's OfFce at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. <~. ;,,~,. REVISED 4/18/07 Bellabrook by J.E. Development, LLC - 300 S. Locust Grove Road: Recommend Approval to City Council 20. Public Hearing: PFP 07-001 Request for aPreliminary /Final Plat approval.to subdivide Lot 13, Block 3 of Vallin Courts Subdivision to create two (2) new lots for Benewah by Walker Homes, Inc. - 2673 North Ridgebury Avenue: Continue Public Hearing to May 3, 2007 ~,; Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - April 19,.2007 Page 4 of 4 t, All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, ~~, please contact the City Clerk's Office at $88-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. ~.. r~ ~ ~. . ~,~ ~.,5•:t: s ~. .~. F .. ,: , t,,, ~:~ ~, :,. J a. .,.. _. 5 r 1 ~. ` t.. - ,,..r h r~ ' ~' ~~'` ~~ a~,' QQ ~~'''' CITY OF ~~~~ ~„~-~q~- ~~~Y'l eY1G~1~17 ~ ~~, "~~' IDAHO )'~ ~Fc ~~ ~R ~ r~~u~ v,~'' ~eo~ ~~~~ • REVISED 4/18/07 MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING REGULAR MEETING AGENDA City Council Chambers 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. k. `Although the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony, -_ all presentations before the Mayor and City Council are expected to be truthful and honest to best of the ability of the presenter." 1. Roll-call Attendance: ~~`~ Tom O'Brien Wendy Newton-Huckabay David Moe ~ Steve Siddoway Michael Rohm -chairman 2. { _ t ~;~ ,_ -~T ,'~,, ~.;< 4'f Cc~ ~7 ,;,; ,~r: ,~ 3. Adoption of the Agenda: ~{~~ ~®~ ~ ~ .~~7G~G~ Consent Agenda: A. Approve Minutes of March 15, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting: ~~~.~ ~ 4. Continued Public Hearing from March 15, 2007: CUP 07-001 Request for Conditional Use Permit for an 11,000 square foot multi-tenant retail building on .75 acres in a C-G Zone for Jamaca Me Tan by Darren Blaser -North of East Fairview Ave and West of Hickory Ave in Lot 3, Block 1, of Mallane Subdivision: ~~~VO~ 5. Continued Public Hearing from March 15, 2007: CUP 07-003 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for apublic/quasi-public use in an I-L zone for Joint School District No 2. Jabil Subdivision by Joint School District No 2 -1303 E. Central Drive: ~ ~~r"~ ~ 6. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-004 Request for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to change the land use designation from Industrial to Commercial for Jabil East Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the Joint School District No. 2 -1303 E. Central Drive (Lot 1, Block 1, Jabil Subdivision): Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - April 19, 2007 Page 1 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. ;~ .*. ; ; _ . ~A 1i+ _ S REVISED 4/18/07 r.' 7. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: RZ 07-005 Request for a =~-' Rezone of 9.21 acres from I-L to a C-G zone for Jabil East Property by ,; the Joint School District No. 2 - 1303 E. Central Drive (Lot 1, Block 1, ~~ 7' Ja it Subdivision): `~' ' ?' ` 8. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-005 Request for ' ~ an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to change the land use designation from Industrial to Commercial for Jabil ' ~'~~ West Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the City of Meridian Planning Department - 915 E. Central Drive (Lot 2, Block 1, Jabil r - ~~ S division): /~ . "~` k": 9. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-001 Request for ~y:x~ a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Future Land Use Map designation from Industrial to Commercial for the property located at 600 E. Franklin Road for Thomas Comprehensive Plan Amendment by Lyn n T h omas -north of E. Franklin Road an d east of Meridian Road: ~ _ ~ ~ ~ c ~; 10. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 200 RZ 07-002 Request for a f '~~ .r; Rezone of 0.628 of an acre from I-L to C-G zone for the Lynn Thomas "~~ Property by Lynn Thomas -north of E. Franklin Road and east of ~ N ~,~~ Me 'dian Road: 11. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-003 Request to V } amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map by adding and ' amendin g pathway locations for the Pathways Comprehensive Plan ~ y.~ ,~ Am nd m e nt by th e C ity o f M eri dian Parks and R ecreation D e p artment: e' '.k??, ~ ~® //w yy~ J./~ G/{. ~ p~ ~, ~ Q~ ,~y f y, I) 9 ~l ~~ ~ ~ - / ~,p a~C/ / ' , / O KA ~~ ~ •/°a~{'~ ~ mil ~ ~c®lA/ < ~, ~~ 12. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-002 Request to y '~ ~ amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map for the south °`:,1. Meridian area to expand future land uses designations to include the land :; `r, east of McDermott Road south to Lake Hazel Road and % mile east of -'~' " Linder Road south to'/2 mile south of Columbia Road, east to '/ mile west ~~~: of Cloverdale Road for South Meridian Area Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the City of Meridian Planning Department: ~q ~ 13. Continued Public Hearing from Apnl 5, 2007: CPA 07-009 Request for `~ a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment to add 4 new designations to the ""' Future Land Use Map and include residential uses in neighborhood .,.~y i centers for South Meridian Area by City of Meridian Planning . r ; ~~ ~< D partment: ~ ~?-~ 1'11s~.~ ~~G>~f~C / ~ ~~ n ~ / tdfi~' fe`Gi'Y) I ~ ~ ®®~ t_, °i ~ 14. Continued Public Hearing from Apri 5, 2007: CPA 07-007 Request to ,'~ amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map for the future Ten ~~ `;`, Mile Interchange area to modify various future land uses designations and to create several new future land use designations for the Ten Mile Area Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the City of Meridian Planning ' ' Department -generally bordered by Linder Road to the east, McDermott -. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - April 19, 2007 Page 2 of 3 ''~` All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ~~ Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, ^'~ please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. S E: r ~_ °~ ,; >_ i; ~~~`;... Vii.:::,, ;i'ii`, ~~~y __<t ~,. ~= ~:= ~: ,.,,~ k;; ;: -_.,~. ~~ .L 4~~' l r`.: -:;; -:~ _... tF ;- a~? .r ;-~~~ ~~ ~ ~::~ ~f.. ,, ~.~.. .~5- .,,.~, ~.. n~~~ REVISED 4/18/07 Road to the west, the Union Pacific Railroad Line to the north and '/2 mile so th of Overland Road to the south: 15. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-008 Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan by adding the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan as an addendum to the Comprehensive Plan for the Ten Mile Specific Area Plan Text by the City of Meridian Planning Department -generally bordered by Linder Road to the east, McDermott Road to the west, the Union Pacific Railroad Line to the north and '/2 mile south of Overland Road to the south: 16. Continued Public Hearing from March 15,007: PP 07-006 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 7 single family residential building lots and 2 common area lots on 1.96 acres in an R-4 zone for Moose Creek Subdivision by Moose Creek Construction - 4275 N. Jones Creek Lane: ~~~~ eye ~~"e ~`~ j f~ ~ u~ ~ ~ 17. ublic Hearing: CUP 07-004 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a bar, the Busted Shovel, in the O-T zone for the Busted Shovel by William Kosterman - 704 Main Street: ~~~~~~ 18. Public Hearing: RZ 07-006 Request for a Rezone of 4.38 acres from an R-8 to an R-15 zone for Bellabrook by J.E. Development, LLC - 300 S. Locust Grove Road: 19. Public Hearing: CUP 07-005 Request for a Conditional Use Permit approval for multi-family residential use in a proposed R-15 zone for Be labrook by J.E. Development, LLC - 300 S. Locust Grove Road: 20. Public Hearing: PFP 07-001 Request for Preliminary /Final Plat approval to subdivide Lot 13, Block 3 of Vallin Courts Subdivision to create two (2) new lots for Benewah by Walker Homes, Inc. - 2673 North Ridgebury Avenue: .~ ~~~ Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - April 19, 2007 Page 3 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. ;~~ ~ti; ~~ ~~~~k ~:-; ;~ ~, _, .~-: ~ ~~ f is li .. s~-. ti r, . ~: :~.:,a ..++ ,: ,. ..~~; ~.~, ~;. .'ri! r ~~ ~# `.;t~. j5 i ~~ .,: jF .'~~ ~ _~, ,~ ,~ .~~ _ ~1;; '_ ::;F; ., ..: '!, :' I~~~! ~o~- ~~~~bU~ N~-r~- ~~ ~ ~. °,. ~~~~. °"~OF ~LL ~ MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING ~-~ ~, ~°j'j(~j~J j ~. REGULAR MEETING IDAHO AGENDA Ay Fc ~q ~* Tt~ensuae V nUEY ' City Council Chambers 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. "Although the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony, all presentations before the Mayor and City Council are expected to be truthful and honest to best of the ability of the presenter." 1. Roll-call Attendance: Tom O'Brien Wendy Newton-Huckabay David Moe Steve Siddoway Michael Rohm -chairman 2. Adoption of the Agenda: 3. Consent Agenda: C' A. Approve Minutes of March 15, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting: 4. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-002 Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map for the south Meridian area to expand future land uses designations to include the land east of McDermott Road south to Lake Hazel Road and '/2 mile east of Linder Road south to'/z mile south of Columbia Road, east to'/ mile west of Cloverdale Road for South Meridian Area Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the City of Meridian Planning Department: 5. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-009 Request for a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment to add 4 new designations to the Future Land Use Map and include residential uses in neighborhood centers for South Meridian Area by City of Meridian Planning Department: 6. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-007 Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map for the future Ten Mile Interchange area to modify various future land uses designations and to create several new future land use designations for the Ten Mile Area Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - April 19, 2007 Page 1 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. n> ; ~; ~~~~ s o ~5 ~ ~ Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the City of Meridian Planning ~'-~ Department -generally bordered by Linder Road to the east, McDermott ~`` Road to the west, the Union Pacific Railroad Line to the north and 'h mile ,i" south of Overland Road to the south: ~.+? 7. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-008 Request to ~~~ } amend the Comprehensive Plan by adding the Ten Mile Interchange :~, ` ' Specific Area Plan as an addendum to the Comprehensive Plan for the ~~~ ~ Ten Mile Specific Area Plan Text by the City of Meridian Planning Department -generally bordered by Linder Road to the east, McDermott °.: ~ ; Road to the west, the Union Pacific Railroad Line to the north and 'h mile ~;= south of Overland Road to the south: ~~ ~'~~ -z~ ~° .; 8. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-003 Request to x; amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map by adding and ~~`~ amending pathway locations for the Pathways Comprehensive Plan ~'''~' ` Amendment by the City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Department: =~ : 9. Continued Public Hearing from April 5 2007: CPA 07-001 Request for '`' `~' , a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Future Land Use Map ;` ~ designation from Industrial to Commercial for the property located at 600 ,,~~ E. Franklin Road for Thomas Comprehensive Plan Amendment by ~: Lynn Thomas -north of E. Franklin Road and east of Meridian Road: ~}:. ~ ' `~ " ~ 10. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: RZ 07-002 Request for a ' "`` Rezone of 0.628 of an acre from I-L to C-G zone for the Lynn Thomas ~` ,°~ Property by Lynn Thomas -north of E. Franklin Road and east of Meridian Road: ,~ ;>~" :,; 11. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-004 Request for '" an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to ~~ ~~:_~s change the land use designation from Industrial to Commercial for Jabil - East Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the Joint School District No. _ 2 -1303 E. Central Drive (Lot 1, Block 1, Jabil Subdivision): 12. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: RZ 07-005 Request for a ~~~~ 0 NN Rezone of 9.21 acres from I-L to a C-G zone for Jabil East Property by - the Joint School District No. 2 - 1303 E. Central Drive (Lot 1, Block 1, --:} ~ Jabil Subdivision): ,~ ~ , 13. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-005 Request for >~ .l, an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to a change the land use designation from Industrial to Commercial for Jabil West Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the City of Meridian s ~ Planning Department - 915 E. Central Drive (Lot 2, Block 1, Jabil ~~E ~ Subdivision): a ~", Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - April 19, 2007 Page 2 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ' Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, ~_ ; ; please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. .. r -~;~~ ~.~, '; ~; rro; , .: q~sc:~.. ~~:;; ;.; . ~::~ ~:~. '3 1 ~;~.~ . ~ `` ;._~j:~, ,,~s -:tt F.~ ~:~_; ~~+: ~~ Sri _~, .: ,. >'>.'t~"~~gc';i ~:~-: o e 14. Continued Public Hearing from March 15, 2007: CUP 07-003 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for apublic/quasi-public use in an I-L zone for Joint School District No 2. Jabil Subdivision by Joint School District No 2 -1303 E. Central Drive: 15. Continued Public Hearing from March 15, 2007: CUP 07-001 Request for Conditional Use Permit for an 11,000 square foot multi-tenant retail building on .75 acres in a C-G Zone for Jamaca Me Tan by Darren Blaser -North of East Fairview Ave and West of Hickory Ave in Lot 3, Block 1 of Mallane Subdivision: 16. Continued Public Hearing from March 15, 2007: PP 07-006 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 7 single family residential building lots and 2 common area lots on 1.96 acres in an R-4 zone for Moose Creek Subdivision by Moose Creek Construction - 4275 N. Jones Creek Lane: 17. Public Hearing: CUP 07-004 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a bar, the Busted Shovel, in the O-T zone for the Busted Shovel by William Kosterman - 704 Main Street: 18. Public Hearing: IZZ 07-006 Request for a Rezone of 4.38 acres from an R-8 to an R-15 zone for Bellabrook by J.E. Development, LLC - 300 S. Locust Grove Road: 19. Public Hearing: CUP 07-005 Request for a Conditional Use Permit approval for multi-family residential use in a proposed R-15 zone for Bellabrook by J.E. Development, LLC - 300 S. Locust Grove Road: 20. Public Hearing: PFP 07-001 Request for aPreliminary /Final Plat approval to subdivide Lot 13, Block 3 of Vallin Courts Subdivision to create two (2) new lots for Benewah by Walker Homes, Inc. - 2673 North Ridgebury Avenue: Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - April 19, 2007 Page 3 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. yryhN x-~ h <« '_: i`'U ~j` v, . ~. ~~ ~ ~~~~ ,. ~;~ ; ,,;, ,`y! l~: ,ao `< ~~: ~y ar `~~` -~ :; ~ F~ .' _;;~, . ~ :~`fi REVISED 4/18/07 ,~ °'~'~;°F F~~y MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING C.%~~r1~IG~n REGULAR MEETING IDAHO ~,; AGENDA ~~ C~R ~ TReasuae V ~'y City Council Chambers 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. "Although the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony, all presentations before the Mayor and City Council are expected to be truthful and honest to best of the ability of the presenter." 1. Roll-call Attendance: Tom O'Brien Wendy Newton-Huckabay David Moe Steve Siddoway Michael Rohm -chairman 2. Adoption of the Agenda: 3. Consent Agenda: A. Approve Minutes of March 15, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting: 4. Continued Public Hearing from March 15, 2007: CUP 07-001 Request for Conditional Use Permit for an 11,000 square foot multi-tenant retail building on .75 acres in a C-G Zone for Jamaca Me Tan by Darren Blaser -North of East Fairview Ave and West of Hickory Ave in Lot 3, Block 1, of Mallane Subdivision: 5. Continued Public Hearing from March 15, 2007: CUP 07-003 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for apublic/quasi-public use in an I-L zone for Joint School District No 2. Jabil Subdivision by Joint School District No 2 -1303 E. Central Drive: 6. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-004 Request for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to change the land use designation from Industrial to Commercial for Jabil East Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the Joint School District No. 2 -1303 E. Central Drive (Lot 1, Block 1, Jabil Subdivision): Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting-Agenda - April 19, 2007 Page 1 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. ~t~~1 4!. ~!'ii:". A 1 -' 1G; °`~? _ KSF ., >~ e ,,~i :;~ r'. ~' , *-' a iir -: ~F .~ rk.: `• t~~' ~.; "' ~4 }~, ~-~. ,., fr .~ " ;;` ~~~ ;; ..~;,~ ~ ~' ;. ~'r~ :,?;'~- ,.{ ~~°F .':3;. -:-~ ~ t'ti ~. ; .. .,. ., ; ~. ;:,~, ~~~;_ • REVISED 4/18/07 7. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: RZ 07-005 Request for a Rezone of 9.21 acres from I-L to a C-G zone for Jabil East Property by the Joint School District No. 2 - 1303 E. Central Drive (Lot 1, Block 1, Jabil Subdivision): 8. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-005 Request for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to change the land use designation from Industrial to Commercial for Jabil West Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the City of Meridian Planning Department - 915 E. Central Drive (Lot 2, Block 1, Jabil Subdivision): 9. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-001 Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Future Land Use Map designation from Industrial to Commercial for the property located at 600 E. Franklin Road for Thomas Comprehensive Plan Amendment by Lynn Thomas -north of E. Franklin Road and east of Meridian Road: 10. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: RZ 07-002 Request for a Rezone of 0.628 of an acre from I-L to C-G zone for the Lynn Thomas Property by Lynn Thomas -north of E. Franklin Road and east of Meridian Road: 11. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-003 Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map by adding and amending pathway locations for the Pathways Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Department: 12. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-002 Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map for the south Meridian area to expand future land uses designations to include the land east of McDermott Road south to Lake Hazel Road and '/2 mile east of Linder Road south to'/2 mile south of Columbia Road, east to '/ mile west of Cloverdale Road for South Meridian Area Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the City of Meridian Planning Department: 13. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-009 Request for a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment to add 4 new designations to the Future Land Use Map and include residential uses in neighborhood centers for South Meridian Area by City of Meridian Planning Department: 14. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-007 Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map for the future Ten Mile Interchange area to modify various future land uses designations and to create several new future land use designations for the Ten Mile Area Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the City of Meridian Planning Department -generally bordered by Linder Road to the east, McDermott Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - April 19, 2007 Page 2 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. ~h;> ,,: -~: {f^ ... REVISED 4/18/07 ~' Road to the west, the Union Pacific Railroad Line to the north and %2 mile `~ south of Overland Road to the south: ;'~~~ ~'~ ~ 15. Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-008 Request to ~~. ~4~, amend the Comprehensive Plan by adding the Ten Mile Interchange >t; Specific Area Plan as an addendum to the Comprehensive Plan for the ~, °?~~ Ten Mile Specific Area Plan Text by the City of Meridian Planning ~~; Department -generally bordered by Linder Road to the east, McDermott F.~ Road to the west, the Union Pacific Railroad Line to the north and '/2 mile t>~~<< south of Overland Road to the south: ~~~ 16. Continued Public Hearing from March 15, 2007: PP 07-006 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 7 single family residential building lots and ``~' ~ ~ 2 common area lots on 1.96 acres in an R-4 zone for Moose Creek Subdivision by Moose Creek Construction - 4275 N. Jones Creek Lane: - 17. Public Hearing: CUP 07-004 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for ~'>` the operation of a bar, the Busted Shovel, in the O-T zone for the Busted '• }' ~: Shovel by William Kosterman - 704 Main Street: ~~} ~~,' ,, ~> 18. Public Hearing: RZ 07-006 Request for a Rezone of 4.38 acres from an ~, ~, R-8 to an R-15 zone for Bellabrook by J.E. Development, LLC - 300 S. ~` Locust Grove Road: `~ 19. Public Hearing: CUP 07-005 Request for a Conditional Use Permit ~- approval for multi-family residential use in a proposed R-15 zone for _~-'~ ,~ Bellabrook by J.E. Development, LLC - 300 S. Locust Grove Road: {? ~ ' ` ;~: 20. Public Hearing: PFP 07-001 Request for aPreliminary /Final Plat ~ ~~y~ approval to subdivide Lot 13, Block 3 of Vallin Courts Subdivision to create two (2) new lots for Benewah by Walker Homes, Inc. - 2673 North Ridgebury Avenue: rt:f :`;~, .. Y` ,t ni_~ i.~ _`.1' ~ ~~~, ~~: A Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - April 19, 2007 Page 3 of 3 ~`; j,'- All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ;:~~; Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, ~?~ ~ '-: please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. ;~ ;. -~ ~ ;;' ' i~~, ~: s'~;s a 3 :.~. ;~~; _ ; M~_:: ;; ,;~s ~.; ,~- .a.; ~ ~ -'' :: rte; _; _ t-~:: ,~ (~, `~` ~; ~` `~" Date/Time 04-18-2007 LocaIID 1 2088884218 Loca11D 2 Total Pages Scanned : 3 Broadcast Report - ~ 09:37:21 a.m. Transmit HeaderText City of Meridian Idaho Local Name 1 Line 1 Local Name 2 Line 2 This document :Failed (reduced sample and details below) Document size : 8.5°x11" ~'~-~(Se~DS~-~Y~ubGC ~o~c,~-~ThX e~sirn ~nsla;' ~'.~ aaERIDIAN PLANNING AND aoNING ~ri~r~ REtiULAR niEETIN~ ~~ AbENDA v ~ City Council Chambers 33 East Idaho Avenue, AAeridian, Idaho Thursday, April 19.2007 at 7:00 p.m. °Altlrough the fifty of Merlallan no longer requbes sworn testlmonY, elf prasetrtatfans before the AQayor acrd GYY Councl! era expected to be ftuthful and honest to best of the ability of the presenter." 1. Ro1i-call Attendances: Tam Cr'Brten Wendy Newton-Huckabay David Moe steve s[daaway Mtchaei F:ohm -chairman 2. Adoption of the Agenda 3. Consent Agenda: A. Approve Minutes of March 18, 2007 PNanntng and Zoning C.ommisston Meeting: 4. CorrtPnuad Publk Hearing from Nfarch 18, 2007: CUP 07.001 fZequest for Conditional Use Permi# for an 11,000 square foot multitenant retail building on .75 acres in a C:-G Zone for Jamaca iHe Tan by Darren Btaser - North of East Fairview Ave and West of Hickory Ave !n Lot 3. Block 1, of Mallane Subdivision: 3. Continued Public Hearing from lttarch 18, 2007: CUP 07.003 Request far a Conditional Use Permit for a pubtictquasi-pubpc use In an I-L eons for doltrt School District No 2. dabil Subdivision by Joirrt School District No 2 -1303 E. Central Drive: 6. Continued Public Hearing from April S, 2007: CPA 07004 F equast far an arrrendment to the C:omprehensNie Plan Future Land Use Map to change the land use destgnatton from industrial to Commen3ai for Jatdl East Comprehensive Flan Aneendment by the Joint School Disbk2 iVo. 2 -1~3 E. Central Drive (Lot 1, Black 1, Jabil Subdivision): Metl~an Ptemdng artd Zoning Garnmksion Mee~ngf~gende - Apra 79, 2®Ur Pegs ? of 3 Atl mehirial6 pre~tMedat public meethp}a aReil b praperiy of the CUy of Merf~. ~Y~ dssMnB n for dtsebUitfoe related io dooumer~s arWl~ Irearhg, pMaae car~ct ttio CUy CterMe Office et 84.433 at hmat 48 homes prior iA fhe public mestrrtg. Total Paaes Confirmed : 48 No. Job Remote Station Start Time Duration Pages Llne Mode Job Type Results 001 153 3810160 09:03:31 a.m.04-16-2007 00:00:00 013 1 G3 HS FA 002 153 8989551 09:03:31 a.m.04-18-2007 00:01:01 3/3 1 EC HS CP79200 003 153 8848723 09:03:31 a.m.04-18-2007 00:01:28 3/3 1 EC HS CP14400 004 153 8886854 09:03:31 a.m.04-18-2007 00:00:46 313 1 EC HS CP28800 005 153 8985501 09:03:31 a.m.04-18-2007 00:01:27 3/3 1 EC HS CP14400 006 153 8467366 09:03:31 a.m.04-18-2007 00:00:46 3/3 1 EC HS CP28800 007 153 8950390 09:03:31 a.m.04-18-2007 00:00:45 3/3 1 EC HS CP33600 ;~~;, e3 i It s F ,~~:~ ~" j := t' _ ~. ~„ t~~`:(' if~i;: q,.".. Broadcast Report ~ ~~. Date/Time 04-16-2007 04:48:15 p.m. Transmit HeaderText Clty of Meridian Idaho Local ID 1 2088884218 Local Name 1 Line 1 ~~~'`'-~' Local ID 2 Local Name 2 Line 2 ''I' ;:Y . ' ,'i~ This document :Failed td '° I' (reduced sample and details below} c ~~~~ ~;.~.~~: Document size : 8.5"x11 " " `$'` ` r ~ tc J ~i~jG~$J< ~~~I' tDr~vl~t'C NbfiCe' A ~a , , ;-` °"''O 'j AdERtQIAN PLANNWt3 AMD ZONINt3 ~ e'j'jfkjl{jZ REGULAR iNEETINCs E '~iFfi ronxo AQ~ENDA ~~: Y ~~'y, Clty Counc6 Chambers ~_ 33 East Idaho Avenue, AAeridFan, Idaho ''; '~" :•,. Thursday, Apri11S, Z~Q07 at 7:00 p.m. ~ °ISlthottgh the City oPMerldlan no long®r requires sworn fesf/mony, ' J a!! pre~trtat7arts befaro iha Mayor and G[y CounrJl are expelled f; to be brlthful and honesfi to !rest ai the eb0ity of the presentee" .Y `: ; - ~. y - 1. Rat!-calf Atxendance: ":1 ~~~' Tom O'8rien Wendy Newton-Nucskabay ,~x~ Clavid Moe Steve Siddoway ~' , il Michael Rohm -chairman `~ 4 `F'^ti t~- z. Adoption of the Agenda: ~; 1 3. CotisentAgenda: `' `'~~ A. Approve Minutes of RAarah 7S, 2007 Planning and 2:oning r. ~, ; Commission Meetlrtg: -x;41 4. Continued Public Heerln® from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-0OZ Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Uae Map for the south Meridian area to expand future land uses designations to include the land east of McDemwtt Raad south to Lake Hazel Roed and '/a n-ite east of L[ndec Road south to Ya mile south of Columbia Road, east to'1. mile west of Cloverdale Road for South Meridian Area Comprehenalve Plan Amendmen by the City of Meridian Wanntng Departmenk 5r. Contlnued Public HeaHrtg from April 8, 2x07: CPA 07-008 Request for a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment to add 4 new designations to the Future Land Use Map and include resldentlal uses in neighborhood centers far South 69eridlan Area by City of Merti#an Plannfr~ Department: '~~i :~;: ',i'--~~ 6. Contlnued Public !fearing flour Aprl15, 2007: CPA 07.007 Request to amend the Comprehensive Wan Fuiure Land Use Map for the future T®n Mile Ittterctrange area to modify vartous future larxt uses designations and to create several new future fern! ttse designations for the Ten Mile Area r,~aiar~ one call zora~ Cwmnissian Meethr8 asar,aa- Attdl ts, 2~7 t~s ~ as Ail nmtedais p~Med at pubtk memirtgs aim6 heaome pfopariyarthe Clly of Nteftd~n. Anyarm des§tng aacammadatton far QktaLitl@ea related f9 doc~unertla an[Vor hearNg. plea.9e am+teat the City deck a Llffire at 888.4433 of teas148 iwws pr(or to Bre pubik meglirgr. Total Paaes Scanned : 3 Total Paaes Confirmed : 45 No. Job Remote Station Start Time Duration Pages Llne Mode Job Type Results 001 130 3810160 04:15:06 p.m.04-16-2007 00:00:00 0/3 1 G3 HS FA 002 130 8989551 04:15:06 p.m.04-76-2007 00:00:56 3/3 1 EC HS CP21600 003 130 8848723 04:15:06 p.m. 04-16-2007 00:01:27 3/3 1 EC HS CP14400 004 130 8886854 04:15:06 p.m.04-16-2007 00:00:46 3/3 1 EC HS CP28800 005 130 8985501 04:15:06 p.m.04-16-2007 00:01:27 3/3 1 EC HS CP14400 006 130 8467366 04:15:06 p.m.04-16-2007 00:00:48 3/3 1 EC HS CP28800 007 130 8950390 04:15:06 p.m.04-16-2007 00:00:45 3/3 1 EC HS CP33600 t:., { ,; s ~-~ ~t,s; <•~-,:: ,, . ~~ ~,''~ ~:~ :`a:' ~_~, S~` . r s qC ~~. *; 'L: ~'~iJ^ ~~.3,,. ?j,. .' b, ~; ti- ~~ " ~'i _~."S-f til~: 't,. ~.~' 4. > -~. .._ ?, I,d }r, e ,~x~; .. `s'M ,r ~_ K Yt?_°rk ~~i ~~~ ~'0~'i } ~: ;~ ~ • a~ -~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting April 19.2007 The regular meeting of the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:00 P.M., Thursday, April 19, 2007, by Chairman Michael Rohm. _ . ~,; t ~, ;~~ Members Present: Michael Rohm, David Moe, Steve Siddoway, Tom O'Brien. -. r. : Members Absent: Wendy Newton-Huckabay. , , v, Others Present: Bill Nary, Machelle Hill, Amanda Hess, Sonya Wafters, Justin Lucas, ' k Y Mike Cole, Scott Steckline, and Dean Willis. 2 :;a Item 1: Roll-call Attendance: ~~ ~st~. `~°-= Roll call. ~. ~ ~ ~, ~ "'' X Tom O'Brien O Wendy Newton-Huckabay X David Moe X Steve Siddoway X Michael Rohm -Chairman rF~~ {" r~: Rohm: Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. At this time I'd like to open the regularly r' scheduled meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission and begin with the `'~~ roll call of Commissioners :;., . `~~ Item 2: Adoption of the Agenda: Rohm: And I see the first item on the agenda is the adoption of the agenda and there ~~', are a couple of changes and I'll just note those changes up front, so that if there is "~ ~_t anyone here to speak to those specific items, you will know in advance that they will not Gb ~{.y . ~*~{. '. ~^~' be heard tonight. Items 12 and 13, both related to CPA 07-002, related to the South _ Meridian Area Comprehensive Plan, that item is going to be continued to November and "'' the reason that that's being continued is there was quite a bit of public comment two '" weeks ago and really a lot of good testimony and, quite honestly, as a city we believe ' that it's best to take all of those comments and try and incorporate them into a better < ` decision down the road and it can't be done in the length of time that we had available ~;M-~ ,; and so it's really in everybody's best interest to put that one off until the next go around ~ ,; and that will be heard again on November 1st of this year. The second item that will be ~~}-~ _ continued is the Moose Creek Subdivision and it will be continued to the regularly " , ; ,; scheduled meeting of June 7th, 2007. And the last item on the agenda tonight, PFP 07- + y ~ 001, related to Benewah, will be continued to the regularly scheduled meeting of May ? 3rd, 2007. Those are the changes to the agenda and with that being said could I get a motion to accept the agenda as amended. nµ 'F fir, Moe: So moved. { ~ '~~~ Siddoway: Second. .=:>_ :. L~.- ~::~~~: * ,`, t -.s:. - '~ ~~ ~ . . . n~~ t~;~ ,~, ,, ::r;:.. .p; ( ^ iiT e Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission ~ " a ?' April 19, 2007 Page 2 of 47 _;a:~ { ~ Rohm: Moved and seconded to accept the amended agenda. All those in favor say '~ "F -: aye. Opposed same sign? Okay. The agenda has been adopted. ~~ MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. a Item 3: Consent Agenda: ;~~ ~~,~ r ,.~~.3 ~~ A. Approve Minutes of March 15, 2007 Planning and Zoning '' ~~~ Commission Meetin g: Rohm: The next item on the agenda is the Consent Agenda and that is the approval of ~ the minutes from the regularly scheduled meeting of March 15th, 2007. Is there any ~`~~ additions or corrections to these minutes? ': ::-.E-, ~~~}~ Moe: I have none. ;; ~ ~~ Siddoway: I have none. ;; ~~< Rohm: Could I get a motion to accept the Consent Agenda? 1S: j;.j Moe: So moved. ~r~iy ,, N' i Siddoway: Second. .. z.' ~ ~` ~~~~ ' Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to accept the Consent Agenda. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. 4q, `°~ s'., ~ MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. ~; ``~~ t ~:i H~ Rohm: Before we open our first hearing, we are going to get the pleasure of our '~ ~~ planning director. ` '~'"=;`'~ Canning: I don't know if this one's a pleasure. Chairman Rohm, Members of the Commission, I just wanted to let you know that this will Justin Lucas's last hearing and =~ to harass him as appropriate for that fact. And that's all. He has resigned from the ' office and I just wanted to let you all know if you hadn't heard yet. And that was all. ~~ ,s. " Rohm: Thank you. And from the Commission I would say that he will be sorely missed. ~ You have done an outstanding job for the city and you will be hard to be replaced. And ~~, ~. ,,,~ any other comments before we move on? Siddoway: I agree. ~ w=~ Moe: I would agree wholeheartedly. ,~. ` '~'` z, Item 4: Continued Public Hearing from March 15, 2007: CUP 07-001 Request ~% t4 ~~ ., ~_ ':~, -:;; y- „~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission '~~. April 19, 2007 Page 3 of 47 ;~~ for Conditional Use Permit for an 11,000 square foot multi-tenant retail ;;y~ building on .75 acres in a C-G Zone for Jamaca Me Tan by Darren Blaser :_:~. f ~ -North of East Fairview Ave and West of Hickory Ave in Lot 3, Block 1, of "~ Mallane Subdivision: "° ~:I Rohm: Okay. At this time I'd like to reopen the Public Hearing of CUP 07-001, related ;;, f`., to Jamaca Me Tan and begin with the staff report. - Hess: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. The application before ~~~ you is a Conditional Use Permit to construct an 11,000 square foot multi-tenant retail _~`~' building. Jamaca Me Tan is proposed to be one of the businesses housed within the '~~~~ subject building. The subject property is located on the north side of Fairview Avenue `~ ~~ t~ approximately a half a mile West of Eagle Road and is currently zoned C-G, as you can ~; ;~ ~~ see on the slide show. The site totals about three-quarters of an acre and is located on "=1' Lot 3, Block 1, of the Mallane Subdivision. A Conditional Use Permit would typically not be required for this project, however, per the conditions of final plat for the Mallane Subdivision all development must obtain CUP approval prior to submittal for a certificate ' of zoning compliance. Let's see. This application was originally scheduled before the ~~~~~- Commission on February 15th, 2007. As a condition of approval for the project staff required of the applicant to obtain across-access agreement with the property to the ~- west. And as you can see that's this property right here. To allow the subject property access to the off-site driveway. And here is the site plan. This is, actually, north over here and they have proposed an off-site driveway to the west here. So, the applicant requested continuance of the hearing to negotiate this access point with the neighbor and staff has finally received confirmation from the applicant that an agreement has been reached. Additionally, the Commission should note that the applicant submitted -- '~ originally submitted west and south facing elevations for the proposed structure. Until •~~ this week staff did not have elevations for the east facade, which now the Commission can see on the PowerPoint presentation. And staff is supportive of the west and south facing elevations. And the Commission should decide this evening if the submitted elevation for the east facade is acceptable or whether changes in the design and materials are warranted for that facade. And that is all staff has, unless the Commission has questions. Rohm: Thank you. Any -- oh. Any questions of staff? Any questions? Moe: I have none. Rohm: Would the applicant like to come forward, please. Siddoway: I have a question. Would you put up the site plan, please? I just want to ~' see it while we are talking. Thank you. ~=~ Blaser: My name is Delane Blaser. Do I give my address? 4712 North Pierce Park Lane, Boise, Idaho. 83714. And I'm barren's brother and I'm just here to represent '~`~~ him and get this -- maybe some of you remember me. I don't know. ;~~ i.. ,~ ~ }; Xr~ ~~~4 s .~i~ ~' i i _.~ ~ ~ t ~; 1r '4;-1C>„ y<y fir.. - -. ~,•~~. ,f p '~~`-'~ iii ~ ~~i a, a ,3 ~ ~ '}~' z ;'~ ~ ~ »~ ~- ~„~~ r ~ },.~'~'~ ~.~ ~:~ ~ ',°~, x }; %rE' :~~~ .ld~ ~F~ 5~1.`~F ~ : '7S '~ ;; ~ 2 n~ ~` ,~+ ~ ~tt~' "A ; ~f ~..og~ . ~~~ ~ ~ F ~t.~ ~. ~ ~'rt F, ~ ~l ~ ~;, ,r ~~tf ~o- ~ ~' ~ ~~ ~'~ j ~t. u o ~: 3 y y ~~~lwt~n .~n~- '~lr~~ - 1 ~. ,~ '~..u. ~. f '~~ r N~ ''£h ! }f 1~ ~~ } t ~. ~,`~a ~ ~ ~ •~,~ u,~i ,j } 4 ti.e.. 2 . v . .. t .Y -.. °~:.a < '~:~, e • Meridian Planning 8 Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 4 of 47 ~; r ~;~ ~. ; _,~, ~ ~= ~; ~3 ':i' ' ~, HR;L r.+ ~y~-. . ~~k y-~ <'~'r -.arc F, ~~=; }. i` ~. }: ~. ~.~ ;~, =~ ~~~~: lLA .-u ~. ~:~ y ~; ~,~ ,.<<. ~ ~ .tip Fj Rohm: I guess, really, the question that we have is the staff report as presented by staff, is that with your concurrence? Do you -- Blaser: Yes. Rohm: You have no problems with the staff report? Blaser: No. No. Rohm: Okay. Moe: I have no questions. I --quite frankly, I'm very happy to see that the cross-access was resolved, as well as the east elevation is much better than it was the first time I saw it. So, I'm -- I have no problem with that at all. Rohm: Okay. And I guess I just have one question of staff. Do we need to put the elevation stipulations into a development agreement or is it just suffice that the presentation says that this was what we will construct and accept that as -- Hess: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, it would just be added as a condition in the staff report. Only rezones and annexation applications have development agreements. Rohm: Okay. Thank you. Okay. Thank you. Siddoway: Mr. Chairman? Rohm: Yes. Siddoway: Out of curiosity, since I was not here on the 15th, I'm looking over the minutes, testimony was taken, but I'm just curious if there were any -- any issues other than the east elevation that stood out from that night? Rohm: I think the main deal was getting that cross-access agreement taken care of and we have a notarized copy of that access agreement now and so those were, really, the two outstanding issues and it appears as if they are -- they have been taken care of. Siddoway: That's all. Thank you. Rohm: Okay. There is -- there isn't anybody else that has signed up to testify to this application, but if there is anyone that would like to come forward, now is that time. Okay. Seeing none -- Moe: Mr. Chair, I move we close the Public Hearing on CUP 07-001 -T' ~~#~I' ~ • ' "'~ ' Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission `~`"'-_~I'~ April 19, 2007 Page 5 of 47 ~i Siddoway: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on CUP 07-001. All favor in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Okay. Motion carves. ~~`~~ MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. ::::~ ~, .~ Moe: Mr. Chairman? ;', `j- Rohm: Commissioner Moe. .;~ ;;,"" Moe: After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to approve file ~~ ~r ::i number CUP 0-7001 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of February ~, :'~ 15th, 2007, continued to the March 1st, 2007, and continued to the April 19th, 2007, meetings, with one modification that the staff enclose -- include the new east elevation within their staff report. I further move to direct the staff to prepare an appropriate ~~ ~~' findings document to be considered at the next Planning and Zoning Commission ;'~ hearing on -- that would be May 3rd. End of motion. ~~~`°~~, Siddoway: I will second for discussion. I'm just wondering if we need to include -.~ anything about the cross-access agreement or is that already completely covered in the '= ~~ ° staff report? Okay. Thank you. Second. :~~ `:~ Rohm: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to approve CUP 07-001, to include the ~ staff report and all changes to that report. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same '?'yr~~'~ sign? Motion carries. ~~ `.~ r~~ i.' MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. '~~~ ~''" Item 5: Continued Public Hearing from March 15, 2007: CUP 07-003 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for apublic/quasi-public use in an I-L zone for Joint School District No 2. Jabil Subdivision by Joint School District No. 2 -1303 E. Central Drive: ~~ Rohm: At this time I'd like to reopen the Public Hearing on CUP 07-003, request for Conditional Use Permit for Joint School District No. 2 of the Jabil Subdivision and begin '~ ~~ with the staff report. Wafters: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. The application before you is a request for a Conditional Use Permit for a public, quasi-public use in an ~. I-L zone by the Joint School District No. 2. The property is located at 1303 East Central ~. ~~ Drive on the south side of East Central and on the west side of South Locust Grove ~~~ ''~"~`' Road. Directly across Central Drive to the north is the Idaho State Police Enforcement Building, zoned C-G. To the west of the site is the United Heritage building and vacant property zoned C-G. To the east are rural residential properties in Ada County. I-84 borders the property on the south. Across I-84 is commercial property, zoned C-G and .~.~.- .... ~.i~ t ii a~~y ~r 9 '`" ~r V, r} M -s ~~~~~~ G`~ r ~r. F ~ ~, dp~F ,« ~~ ,~ 'E~ ~} ! :-~~~ ;, 1. A w~ di t~.; n. ~~~ " ~,:' ~ f~ e 'k ~ a a~~ ~• ak '.: ~A~~ r ~ s r',+' ~, 5 4'r ;.~ ,~ ~? z Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission ~` ~;~ ~ April 19, 2007 ~;,,,. r Page 6 of 47 F '`~~' L-O, and vacant land zoned RUT in Ada County. The applicant is proposing to use ,.',, ~¢:~r:~ 325,500 square feet of the existing building for a high school, high school administration ~' ~ " offices, general classrooms, and vocational technology programs for the Joint School F ~,', District. The proposed use is considered a public, quasi-public use and requires ~ ~ conditional use approval in an I-L zone. Access to the site is currently provided from ~~I East Central Drive and no new access points to the site are proposed or approved with ~~ this application. There is existing landscaping on the site. Additional landscaping is not +~`'~~ required with this application. This shows the different uses within the building. District ~~ ~, service center up front. High school academies here. And, then, they have talked '~~~ °~ about in the future possibly leasing the rest of it out to state university for classrooms. fit. , ,.. Those arc cvic4inn olo~i~~innc. .~~ ~hn c•ifn c hnuiinry +he ovie~inn hniJcn~ninn ~rn~ ~nrl }~ -t ounaing ana m the parking ioi. ~iarr is recommenarng approval or ineir requestea ~ ~:;~ ~h ;," Conditional Use Permit as stated in the staff report, subject to the conditions listed in ~_ ~~-' Exhibit B. That's all staff has, unless the Commission has questions. Rohm: Any questions of staff at this time? Commissioner Siddoway. ;: Siddoway: I have one. Sonya, two items from now we are going to approve a -- we have on our -- a consideration for a rezone of this property. Same property, right, from =~~ I-L to C-G? "~~ Wafters: Yes. ~;t.~~. Siddoway: If we approve that rezone, do they need this Conditional Use Permit? e., ~ ~. _ Wafters: Commissioner Siddoway, the rest of the Commissioners, yes, they need the ":y 11 Conditional Use Permit because they want to start as quickly as they can with the new `~a ~ ~ use. That's the reason for that. ":K~I ~~-~ Siddoway: Okay. :,~~' ~~;r, Wafters: The proposed use will better fit once the property is rezoned and the Comp Plan -- Siddoway: Okay. rr ~y ~~~~ Wafters: -- amended. .r~'_' Rohm: Okay. Any other questions of staff? Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward. ``;<'; Daniels: Ed Daniels. 2785 Bogus Basin Road, Boise, Idaho. I think the staff has # covered the project pretty well. I don't know if there is anything I could add, but I can certainly stand for any questions that the Commission may have. +P *~; l~ -i ._ 1 :, ~ r.5 :rt ~,{ y 1 ~;t 1 .. -.d~. ,Y . _~4. -bt` ,_~ -~; ~~ ,,- :: ~;_ ~~';<:: ~:; Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 7 of 47 Rohm: Yeah. I think we really heard this for the most part two weeks ago and there is not a substantial change, but any questions of the applicant? Moe: I have none. Siddoway: I have none. Rohm: Thank you. Daniels: Thank you. Rohm: Okay. We don't have anybody else that has signed up for this application, but if there is someone that would like to come forward, now is that time. Seeing none -- Siddoway: I move to close the Public Hearing. Rohm: On? Siddoway: CUP 07-003. That's the only one that's open. Moe: I'll take a second, then. Rohm: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on CUP 07- 003. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Siddoway: Mr. Chairman, after considering all testimony, I move to approve file number CUP 07-003 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of -- not today's hearing date, is it? Moe: April the 5th. Siddoway: Is it April the 5th? No, because it's not that one. We, actually, don't have it in our laser fiche. Wafters: April 19th. Siddoway: For 4/19? Thank you. Staff report for April 19th, 2007, with no modifications. I further move to direct staff to prepare an appropriate findings document to be considered the next Planning and Zoning Commission hearing on May the 3rd. End of motion. Moe: Second. ~~ -~1% i~~y ~.•~f: ~t =~? --. _~ ~,: ~~~~ ~, .yY_, .~~. Y ~,, ,;,., __:_ ~._:.~i'~'. }, ',Tr ~~ ~~: ,,; ;,,. ~> x ~`~; _ ~: ~ °r ,,,; s ~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 8 of 47 Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to approve CUP 07-003. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 6: Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-004 Request for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to change the land use designation from Industrial to Commercial for Jabil East Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the Joint School District No. 2 -1303 E. Central Drive (Lot 1, Block 1, Jabil Subdivision): Rohm: At this time I'd like to reopen the continued Public Hearing from April 5th, 2007, of CPA 07-004 and begin with the staff report. Hess: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. The application before you is a Comprehensive Plan amendment to amend the future land use map of the Comprehensive Plan to change the existing industrial designation to commercial for one 34 acre parcel. Nary: Amanda, can you pull the mike closer. We can't hear you on this side. Hess: Sony. Is that better? Nary: Yes. ~r `~. Hess: Okay. The property is located on the west side of Locust Grove Road at 1303 East Central Drive and is currently referenced as Lot 1, Block 1, of the Jabil Subdivision. The property currently lies within Meridian city limits and is zoned I-L. This is, actually, the same property that was just discussed in the previous Public Hearing. As previously stated, the property has two approved access points to East Central Drive and -- which is a commercial collector street. Concurrent with the CPA request the applicant has applied for rezoning of 9.21 acres to C-G and that is the northern portion where the district offices will be housed. The property is proposed for a new high school with associated classroom and office spaces and may possibly house a university extension. Additionally, the Joint School District service center will be sited here. Currently, educational institutions are prohibited uses within the I-L district, however, they are principally permitted within the C-G district. In the past the subject parcel was identified as appropriate for industrial uses to take advantage as it was seen -- of what was seen as a booming manufacturing and development. However, staff believes the increased commercial development within the immediate area has deemed this site more appropriate for retail, service, and office uses now. And this will also contribute to the growing needs of the City of Meridian for additional school facilities and accessible higher education. The staff supports the Comprehensive -- the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezone request. Staff believes commercial land use designation and zoning for the subject property would be in the best interest of the °p : . y~ e • Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission ~~~ " April 19, 2007 Page 9 of 47 s city and, therefore, staff is recommending approval of the subject CPA and rezone ' ~~"` application. And that's all staff has, unless the Commission has questions. .` a Rohm: Thank you. Any questions of staff? ' Moe: I have none. «:~* w,~i .< {'~ Siddoway: I have none. :a.- `~° ~t R~'~ Rohm: Mr. Nary, she spoke to the rezone as well. Do you think that it might be appropriate to go ahead and open that hearing, too, seeings how the two kind of run ~;.; concurrent? =' Nary: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, yeah, that's probably most "~~ appropriate to do that. ~' °r 1L1. ~~ - Rohm: Okay. I think because we have heard the staff report I'm going to go ahead and do that. I'm going to open up the continued Public Hearing for RZ 07-005 to be heard concurrently, of which we have received staff report on both. And thank you, Amanda, -.. you did a good job. Okay. I guess is there an applicant other than the city to speak to ~~~` this? Would the school district like to come back up? Do you have anything to add to ~~' the staff report? , ~.~ Daniels: No, I don't. -~ ~ `~`~ Rohm: Okay. You'll probably have to reintroduce yourself. ,Y Daniels: Sorry. Ed Daniels. 2785 Bogus Basin Road. ~r! Rohm: Okay. Any questions of the applicant for these two public hearings? 1` Moe: No. ~ ~~ Siddoway: I have none. '. ~ `°'. Moe: I have none. :~: f~. ~~~ Rohm: Okay. Thank you. And, again, we don't have anybody signed up, but if anyone r would like to come forward and speak to this application, now is the time. Seeing , ~F,~=~~ ; none -- Moe: Mr. Chairman, I'd like to close the Public Hearing on CUP 07-004 and RZ 07-005. ;~: Siddoway: Second. ~{ ;_; ;, ,_ ,. -:i. _;;;- ~~4r~~ ;~~.,, ;~..: - ~~~; _ , ~~°. . ~` ^ :+' .~._, i`; Meridian Planning 8~ Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 10 of 47 Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to close the public hearings on CPA 07-004 and :'~~< RZ 07-005. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carries. ,~~ ~-~i MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. -~ ~, ~ ~~, _ Moe: Mr. Chairman, I, initially, you know, was in approval of this two weeks ago and we ,_;: ; had no other public testimony, so if no one else here has any complaint, I will move for ~~: a motion. '~~ Siddoway: Let me just ask -- would it be appropriate to move on all the Comp Plan .~~` Amendments at the end or should we take them one at a time? I'm just -- seeing new ' information on Ten Mile, I'm not sure if there is a reason or not to continue again. We "`;~`~' may just want to act on them all tonight and move them forward. But if we move on several and, then, there is one that we want to continue a week, we won't be able to. Moe: Well, we are already going to continue the south Meridian plan, so are we going to need to take them one at a time or -- F ;tC ~. ~' Rohm: I think what he's saying, though, is if we have some unanswered questions with ~5 ~~~ the Ten Mile and/or the pathway amendments that need to have continued discussion ~~-, to the following meeting, if they all three go together and, then, are forwarded onto City Council as a unit -- is that what your -- Siddoway: Yeah. I mean I'm comfortable with this one, in favor of it, but I just think we ~~ may want to approve them all after we have -- after we are ready to do so. ~~~ R h Ok W ll o m: a e , then, ma be at this time it would be a Y Y ppropriate to just act on the ~ ~~~~~ rezone and, then, we will do the -- .~.:~~: Nary: Mr. Chairman, you can't act on the rezone until you do the Comp Plan amendments. You can't do it that way. "~~~ ~^fbS Rohm: Okay. All right. ~ i~_],a_ ~~, .~,~t 'ti: Nary: So, if you are going to -- I mean, Mr. Chair, Members of the Commission, I mean ` ` -~-sue << Commissioner Siddoway is right, if you want to at least be assured that all of the ones f,; that are going to be moved forward from tonight and there isn't any other issues that Y `' might cause it to be set over to your next meeting, that's probably the -- that's probably wise to wait until you get to the end of the Comp Plan ones to, then, do them all `~;; together, which you have to table the rezone until that point as well. ~~ `~ 3` i r " i'~ Siddoway: It would be after Item 15. ;; ,~- .3~~ Nary: Right. ~~~,~ ;~, ~~ tE ~y 'j ~' "i.... ~~~y . .°:: ~: t, ~'? -; ~,~ ~4^. .<: }; :.y ~:: ~- ., , ~ ~ L _ _ y: -~'~ ~. ;~~; :~. .~ ~ c k-- ,.., <:S ~:~ °:~,, ` _>- ~~: •S tY (} N,, {;: ~~~w :4~' ,~~~: ~a ,~ ~ t }~ }' ~t~ :~~ x x,- ~., ~4 Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 11 of 47 Rohm: Okay. We will do it that way. Any other comments before we -- Mr. Nary, then, we would just table these and not necessarily close -- Siddoway: We can close it. Nary: You can close the Public Hearing -- you can close the Public Hearing and move to table them until after Item 15. Rohm: Okay. And -- Moe: We have already closed them. Siddoway: Mr. Chairman, I move that we table CPA 07-004 and RZ 07-005 until after Item 15 on the agenda. Moe: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to table Item CPA 07-004 and RZ 07-005 until after Item No. 15 on tonight's agenda. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 7: Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: RZ 07-005 Request for a Rezone of 9.21 acres from I-L to a C-G zone for Jabil East Property by the Joint School District No. 2 -1303 E. Central Drive (Lot 1, Block 1, Jabil Subdivision): Item 8: Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-005 Request for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to change the land use designation from Industrial to Commercial for Jabil West Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the City of Meridian Planning Department - 915 E. Central Drive (Lot 2, Block 1, Jabil Subdivision): Rohm: Okay. At this time I'd like to reopen the continued Public Hearing from April 5th, 2007, of CPA 07-005 and begin with the staff report. Hess: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. The application before you is a Comprehensive Plan amendment to amend the future land use map to change the existing industrial designation to the commercial designation for one 19 acre parcel. This parcel is known as Lot 2, Block 1, of the Jabil Subdivision, which is located directly west of the Jabil circuit building, which is now owned by the school district. This is a highly visible location of the property along Interstate 84 and East Central Drive -- the existing commercial zoning to the north and west, as you can see right here and here. And a potential commercial district to the east now makes the property a good a :. ~~.:1 ,, ih y, z. ~. xl ~- ,. j -t' .~ ~~, ~~I', '~W ~ _. ;,f ~~ i`:=~ _~ 9 .~~,+~ ,' . s`+~ .: ,~ ,:~. ,qt's ~~_, Q 3=',~~_: ~, ~,;;;; ,~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 12 of 47 r~ u candidate for commercial uses, rather than industrial uses. The site is bordered on two sides by properties zoned C-G, which I already stated. And to be further clarified, Jabil Subdivision, Lot 1, Block 1, the school district site, has submitted an application for a future land use map amendment from industrial to commercial, as well as rezoning from I-L to C-G. Therefore, the subject site would be -- the subject site being Jabil West, Lot 2, Block 1, would be an island of property designated for industrial use that is located within an area developed for commercial, retail, and office uses. Approval of the subject CPA would allow the applicant to potentially obtain four commercial zoning designations. The four commercial zoning designations include general retail and service commercial, C-G, which allows the broadest mix of retail, office, service and light industrial uses, as well as the C-N, C-C, and L-O zoning districts. Staff supports the subject Comprehensive Plan amendment. Staff believes a commercial land use map designation for the property would be in the best interest of the city. Therefore, staff is recommending approval of the application. And that is all staff has, unless the Commission has questions. Rohm: Thank you, Amanda. Any questions of staff? Siddoway: I have none. O'Brien: None. Rohm: Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward and speak to this? I don't know that it's necessary, but --okay. Seeing no applicant, is there anyone else that would like to speak to this project before we close it? Okay. Seeing none -- Siddoway: Mr. Chairman, I move that we close the Public Hearing for CPA 07-005. Moe: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on CPA 07-005. All those in favor way aye. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Rohm: Okay. Siddoway: Mr. Chairman, I move to table action on CPA 07-005 until after Item 15 on the agenda. Moe: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to table CPA 07-005 until after Item 15 on the agenda. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. r iF_ ,. rx~~ ~; ._ r y- ,__ ~_~ -~,; ~, . ~ r_~ - ~sr ~,, .~:_; ,~s, >~5 `= t, ,;~. ~ ,,r , hb~ 7 3 ~~ ~ ~: r , ~~ ':`t:r '~ w ::j; ~ ` ~~; ,.: k '~~~;; Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 13 of 47 Rohm: Possibly we could have had a little bit of discussion to just validate that there is - - you know, if there is any concems from any of the Commissioners about moving forward with that, because by the time we get back to it after Item 15 -- and so -- I don't know. Mr. Nary, is this appropriate for us to have some discussion at this point in time? Nary: Mr. Chairman, certainly. Rohm: Okay. So, I guess with that being said, is there any concern over this application that any of you feel are unresolved? Moe: I have none. Siddoway: I have no concems with any of the previous Jabil applications. Item 9: Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-001 Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Future Land Use Map designation from Industrial to Commercial for the property located at 600 E. Franklin Road for Thomas Comprehensive Plan Amendment by Lynn Thomas -north of E. Franklin Road and east of Meridian Road: Item 10: Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: RZ 07-002 Request for a Rezone of 0.628 of an acre from I-L to C-G zone for the Lynn Thomas Property by Lynn Thomas -north of E. Franklin Road and east of Meridian Road: Rohm: Okay. That's kind of where I was going with that. Okay. Thank you. All right. At this time I'd like to open the continued Public Hearing from April 5th, 2007, Item No. CPA 07-001 and RZ 07-002. Both of these items related to the Thomas property on Franklin Road and begin with the staff report. Wafters: Thank you, Chairman Rohm, Members of the Commission. I'll just give a quick recap on this, since this is a continued item. The subject property is located here on the north side of Franklin Road. It's right next to the fire station. Here in purple. The applicant is requesting that the Comp Plan be amended to a commercial designation, rather than industrial on this property, and is also requesting a rezone from I-L to C-G. The applicant did not submit a development plan, but did submit -- it's just a vacant piece of property. Did submit a conceptual elevation for the propose building on the site. That's all staff has, unless the Commission has questions. Rohm: Any questions of staff? Moe: I have none. Siddoway: Sonya, is the conceptual elevation tied to a development agreement in the staff report? ~; ~~ ~~ -~~..~ ~'S~ ~. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 ` Page 14 of 47 ~ ~r if YYl '~'~'~' Watters: Chairman Rohm, Commissioner Siddoway, Commissioners, it is not tied to a gat ;-~~ development agreement -- well, excuse me. Just a second. Let me double-check on that. Siddoway: I think that was the one thing that I had from last time. i~ ;~ Watters: Yeah. It was not tied to a development agreement in the staff report. `£'~" However, I think the Commission wanted to include one at the last meeting for that to be able to tie the elevations to it. i ~. ~ ~~~ ~ ~ Siddoway: Okay. Thank you. ;;:<- Rohm: Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward. Okay. Sonya, the applicant -- is she aware that there will be a development agreement attached to the staff report ~~ ~~ specifying the elevations or --did you have a discussion with -- ;¢F ~'~' Wafters: Chairman Rohm, Members of the Commission, I did not discuss it with her. ~' ~F _~ .~ did leave a voice mail on her phone, so she would be aware of that. Rohm: Okay. I think that a motion might say -- would be conditional to a development ' agreement seems appropriate to me. +: , ,, ~' Siddoway: That would be my intent, Mr. Chairman. If the applicant has any issue with it `~'~ she can always take it up with Council. Rohm: There you go. Okay. Is there anyone from the audience that would like to speak to this application at this time? Seeing none -- ,:< Moe: Mr. Chairman, I move to close the public hearings on CPA 07-001 and RZ 07- ~~- 002. w ~x:, Siddoway: Second. ¢~ : ` ,:. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to close the public hearings on CPA 07-001 and _ RZ 07-002. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. ,w: ;, }'~ ~~ Moe: Mr. Chairman, I move that we table CPA 07-001 and RZ 07-002 to the end of the t. ' "_ meeting after Item 15. .~ ~ ~'. r : Siddoway: Second. . iiv ? €ti y~ ~~ ~~'~ _ t•~ ,;, ~~; ~zisS+i: t ~ • • ~~~ ' Meridian Planning 8 Zoning Commission :-= ~~ April 19, 2007 ' " <:-. Page 15 of 47 y Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to table Item CPA 07-001 and RZ 07-002 until . ~~ after we have heard Item No. 15 on tonight's agenda. All those in favor say aye. , ~ Opposed same sign. Okay. Motion carried. 3f~i '~'' MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. ~' ~~ }' Item 11: Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-003 Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map by adding and _ amending pathway locations for the Pathways Comprehensive Plan ~^ ~~~ ~; . ~I Amendment by the City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Department: ~I Rohm: At this time I'd like to open the continued Public Hearing from April 5th, 2007, ~~~~ Item No. CPA 07-003 related to the Pathway Comprehensive Plan Amendment and . begin with the staff report. ,+ Lucas: Thank you, Chairman Rohm, Members of the Commission. If you don't mind, ' I'd just like to take a moment and say I have truly enjoyed my time with the City of < ~~`~~~ Meridian and just so you know, one of my favorite parts of the job is the interaction that :'~ \ ~ have with you at this meeting and with the public. I appreciate this process and think it's :~~;AI ;~ ~ very important and have really enjoyed my time here with the city and the ability I have '~~I had to try and participate in this process. And so with that said, I will move onto the r'I Pathways Comprehensive Plan Amendment. As was discussed at the last meeting, this ~r 1~~,„~~ is the proposed update to the Comprehensive Plan land use map. Specifically it's an update to the pathway network that is indicated on that plan. There was quite a bit of ' ` discussion at the last meeting regarding this -- regarding this proposed amendment and °` ~'~ ~%' I feel that most of the concems were taken care of at that last meeting. I don't think =~~y there is much more to discuss from staffs perspective at this point. °~~~' Rohm: Thank you. Any questions of staff? -'; s ;~ ":' Siddoway: I have none. t~; Moe: I have none. =,~1 Rohm: Okay. And I believe you're right. And just for those of you that are here tonight, ,~r~ basically, the discussion centered around concems that pathways were going to be ~"~~~~ developed on properties that were -- with homes that -- backyards that were existing `~~ 'I there, rather than as part of a redevelopment program and that discussion I believe alleviated a lot of the concems from last week, because none of those folks are here tonight. So, I think that concludes the discussion on the pathway Comprehensive Plan amendment. Could I get a motion to close the Public Hearing? ~~ ~~1 Moe: You want to make sure the public doesn't -- ~, s: ~ Rohm: There is nobody signed up, but if anyone would like to come forward and speak :~~;~ to the pathways, now is that time. Seeing none -- ~~. ~z ~~~ ;';~~~'i '~,~, ti ~~ ~, - x~ ~_: .. ri:=- r_•.yh N. r~ ;:<< :: ;; lr ;;~ ,:.: ~~~,. ~., f _a~,; q~ ~' ., =~, _~ h E~; ::;~~:~ ;t~ ., ,., n5 ,F ~. q. w~~,j ::~~~Y~~`]] a; ~,~y,:; p. ~'i ,::.'fr' ~,.,.- . ~~' ~~; ,:t,r ,it 'r Ti4'~~~ :',F;'i Y i~` ll~ [:.'Illll''":1111 _ ,~<<.; 1 e • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 16 of 47 Siddoway: Mr. Chairman, I'd just like to say that I did take the comments from the last meeting seriously and have done some research into the issues of pathways and crime statistics. I actually have several pieces. I would just like to read one short piece into the record that summarizes what I found. It says: Available literature and statistics indicate no discernible rising in crime along newly designated trails. In fact, studies indicated a reduction of crime and vandalism on official designated trails, because trail users serve as eyes and ears for urban, as well as rural trails. Designating a trail officially brings increased use of the trail by lawful trail enthusiasts, often reducing the amount of vandalism and crime that occurred when the trail was unofficial or underutilized for recreational purposes. So, I would -- with that and others that I have found similar to that, I just state my support for the pathways plan and with that I would move to close the Public Hearing on CPA 07-003. Moe: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on CPA 07-003. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Siddoway: Mr. Chairman, I move we table CPA 07-003 until after Item 15 on our agenda. Moe: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to table Item No. CPA 07-003 until after Item 15 on the agenda. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 12: Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-002 Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map for the south Meridian area to expand future land uses designations to include the land east of McDermott Road south to Lake Hazel Road and'/2 mile east of Linder Road south to %2 mile south of Columbia Road, east to'/ mile west of Cloverdale Road for South Meridian Area Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the City of Meridian Planning Department: Item 13: Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-009 Request for a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment to add 4 new designations to the Future Land Use Map and include residential uses in neighborhood centers for South Meridian Area by City of Meridian Planning Department: n3 ~~r ~-~~~ e • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 17 of 47 r_i 1~ Rohm: Okay. At this time I'd like to open Items No. CPA 07-002 and CPA 07-009 for ~ the sole purpose of continuing these items to the regularly scheduled meeting of " •' November 1st, 2007. ~ y ~`' ;" j ~Q `~~ef ~'' Moe: So moved. " Siddoway: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to continue Items No. CPA 07-002 and CPA 07- L~ 009 to the regularly scheduled meeting of November 1st, 2007. All those in favor say ; aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carves. ,,~ ~'``'~~ MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Rohm: Wow, we are doing pretty good tonight. : Moe: Don't speak too soon. ~, big rte' Item 14: Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-007 Request to b ~i r; amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map for the future Ten ` Mile Interchange area to modify various future land uses designations and "' `~' to create several new future land use designations for the Ten Mile Area Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the City of Meridian Planning " ` ~~= Department -generally bordered by Linder Road to the east, McDermott ,~'~ Road to the west, the Union Pacific Railroad Line to the north and'/2 mile '~- south of Overland Road to the south: ;, ~~ 3 ;"a ~ ~ ~ Item 15: Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-008 Request to `~ .; amend the Comprehensive Plan by adding the Ten Mile Interchange _ , Specific Area Plan as an addendum to the Comprehensive Plan for the ;'~` Ten Mile Specific Area Plan Text by the City of Meridian Planning Department -generally bordered by Linder Road to the east, McDermott ~ ` the Union Pacific Railroad Line to the north and'h mile Road to the west ,~ ~:~ ~~~ i= , south of Overland Road to the south: ~,, ~' ~ ~ Rohm: Okay. At this time I'd like to open CPA 07-007 and CPA 07-008 and begin with _ the staff report. Lucas: Thank you, Chairman Rohm, Members of the Commission. This -- these Items _ deal with the Ten Mile Area Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendment that was ~~ '" i` ~ discussed at length at the last meeting. I think it would be a good idea to go directly into t,. `'x~ the -- some of the direction that we received -- staff received both from the public and ' from the Commission at the last hearing. I have an exhibit here that kind of summarizes ~~~~ the -- the recommended changes that came from some of the public testimony and the `~ Commission specifically asked for an exhibit that described those changes and how the new map would look if those changes were made. I'd like to go through them one by >; ;:;. <; ,; -~,~, '; J ..:: rt,~~-' ~~`~ ;~;~. .~ ~~, f; ,~~~-~ ~ ~,~.: -. ,~_ ~ ,> Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 18 of 47 • -, ~ one just so everyone is clear on what we are talking about. The first of those changes 4 ~ :,' was a change in designation on this triangular piece of property here from medium density residential to high density residential as designated there. Also, a similar .- change here from -- I think this one is from medium density residential to mixed use '` "`_ community. There is a small piece of property here. On the comer here, the southeast ~.~~ comer of the Ten Mile and Franklin, was a requested change from -- or a change from ~~ the designation which is mixed use residential to mixed use commercial for that entire /~yk x, `~~~"'I comer. And also related to that was a discussion of going to a full access point at this location, rather than aright-in, right-out. Some changes here south of the freeway 'r'~t° ~~ included a possible rerouting of this street to get a closer connection to the freeway and a possible location somewhere for -- for a gas station. This exhibit here, as you can see, this -- the changes haven't been made here on this map and when I toggle down you will see that this is what the map would look like with those changes made. You '~~~~~ can see the commercial designation there, the increase in density there, the extended ~~~r commercial designation there. These changes were a little bit harder to make, because } they are more conceptual in nature, but certainly there could be text within the plan , n~` ~! amended to allow for some of these changes, along with that access request also. As was discussed at the - at the last hearing, staff, as we looked at these changes, found ;: ':;i them to be mostly reasonable. None of the requests were giving staff major -- you ;.,'~I know, major issues. So, really, it was -- this is just the response to the Commission's `` request to see those changes on a map and to kind of make your decision about how - ''~''y how the Commission feels about -- about those changes. Along with that, we also -~~r~ received just today, this afternoon, a pretty detailed letter from the Ada County Highway '` '~~ District regarding the Ten Mile area specific plan. Before I read some of that letter into _. ~t ,;l the record, I just wanted to kind of respond just in general about this process and the map itself. Comprehensive Plans by -- in nature are very conceptual. This plan is a - little bit different. It's more detailed than we usually have in this city. Our main map that 3F=~ we use is very conceptual and, obviously, get into a lot more detail than that, especially ~.:s;z when it comes to the proposed road network, this collector network that's shown on the `~~~ plan. But even with that said, this plan still remains conceptual and there is room for ~~~~ discussion about implementation measures and how all of these things will actually work through the process. And so ACHD -- ACHD's letter was very detailed -- in staffs '~~~:~, opinion somewhat -- in some cases maybe a little bit too detailed with their analysis of I some of these -- of these areas, because this isn't a development application in the ' sense of we don't know -- you know, we don't know the users, we don't know exactly '~~ what's going to happen out here, we are just kind of doing a conceptual plan of what the ~. vision is and with that said staff feels it's important that we keep that in mind as we ~~ consider ACHD's comments and realize that there is a lot of room still to work a lot of ''~~" these implementation measures out. ACHD points out some errors in the plan that -- ~'-~_~~~' which, obviously, can be corrected, but when it comes to their main three points, staff ''~~~'` feels that -- that, really, the plan can stand alone and it's not necessarily imperative that , ~ we address all of these points that they have brought up here tonight, because a lot of ; ~: ,:,-,. that will happen in the natural process of development and when applications come in and through how we work with them through the implementation of this. And I also feel ~'~~: it's important to note that ACHD was involved from the very beginning on this plan, ~~ involved in the charrette process, involved in the public information process, and so for , . ~ i . .i ., ~~ ~ aiF .~ ~F ~v Y '+t f 4 ~ ~~ tY" T P~h xT'~"" ~ ~ ~ t~::..x x- .. . ;~, '~~IiyyT ~k,+~t ~~ - - 1:- ', ,r ~ x~'..+ 2 ~ f'~ ~'i ~- ~ ~' x ~ ~_ ~ d~Cf+ca tti~ SKi9,,q r~, di ,.t=~~ia i0- r ~~,~~ ,L „t, ,r ~~ 7 ~~~;~ ' ~~ ~_ t ',' ,,rcc~~ $~ p.. fur ~ xF 3i4 ,~~ ,x x ~ t ., ~~Sy X4 '~. ~l ~~ _ ~~Y~~ > ~E~ ~ a. ~'~' a ~ "~~.~'~ ,~ ~k~~ ~ .~ ~. R ,~ 5~l ~°. ~ yy~ ~~'AM1 ".l.: ~. ~. ._ ;. ~~ • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 19 of 47 • us to get these comments today -- this afternoon regarding the plan, it's great that we got them, but they have been and have had a chance to comment on this plan for quite awhile now and so to do that in -- to do that in a sense to this Commission and pressure on you to take all this in tonight is maybe a little bit too much to ask, really. And so I would -- those are kind of the things I wanted to make clear and, hopefully, that will help as we -- as the Commission considers this plan for approval. I'm going to read a little bit of what those issues are just into the public record, so it's clear to everyone. I'll just summarize. It says: ACRD has reviewed the Ten Mile interchange plan as submitted by the City of Meridian, with the assistance from HGR, which was the consultant. Overall, the plan was viewed as strong in overall substance, thoughtful and thorough in its comprehensiveness, and creative in its design and vision for what the location should be --for what the location should eventually resemble. The plan has a few major issues and several minor points that ACHD wishes to comment on. The major points are below, while the minor points are attached. I will only discuss the major points through this portion of the staff report. It says the first signalized intersection location. The plan states that the intersection is to be located 1,000 feet north of the high top of the new interchange. Since this is the measure -- and just so we are clear, this is talking about the first intersection to the north of the freeway proposed to be located right at that location. Since this is a major -- since this is measured from the highest point of the interchange and assuming the elevation relief would require at least 200 to 300 feet before being level, this means the first signalized intersection will be located closer to 700 to 800 feet from the off-on ramp and creating similar issues of that to Eagle Road. ACHD recommends this intersection be moved further north to avoid -- to avoid likely -- to avoid likely stacking that would take place. Point number two. Impact fees and funding mechanisms. The plan does not accurately reflect the ACHD impact in extraordinary impact fee structure and does not address realistic possibilities for funding the collector street system in this area. While noting the importance of finding methods in which to develop the desired network, it is our recommendation that this section be either rewritten or removed altogether. We are happy to assist in refining this language ~~~ ~ If necessary. And the final and third pornt Is Overland Road. Thls Overland realignment study is not complete. The south Meridian plan has yet to be fully developed and has •~ not been finalized by the consultant, ACHD, or the City of Meridian and is, thereof, not ~~;~ . ready for official action. Until this is the case, which will be well after the Ten Mile plan ~;. ~ ,, ~~`z`, ~~ ~a ~ is finalized, discussing the possible alignments of Overland may be premature and _, P 4 , ~ "~ ~ ; should be handled with the delicacy of warrants due to the unknown factors that ~j ;r f~ surround the future of the roadway. Those were the main points that ACRD wanted to ~ bring up and I think the general response from staff is that some of those points -- '~ ~ ' ~ certainly there is -- there is further discussion to be had and when it comes to exact ~`~. r distances and things like that of roads from the high top of the on-ramp and off-ramp zti and things like that, this plan really -- as I stated earlier, is conceptual in nature and 4 ~ ~~~~>~ ~ .` there is, you know, flexibility when it comes to things like that. But overall staff stands ~.,.~ behind the plan. A lot of thought went into the plan and doesn't -- doesn't feel that major ' ~~ :` changes need to be made at this point to the plan. And I'll stand for any questions with ;~ - '~ :: that. ~'` , w 7 ~ ~ ~ Rohm: Thank you. That was a fine presentation. Any questions of staff? ~" ; .~. r~ ~r a.: ~: k ~ ,~ ~ , ~. : ~~~~ ~~ . ~., ~. ' ~, ~~ ~~ , .,;~F K ; Tr~~,~ ~~ "~M 1~W~~ 1 ~ ~` t Y,~~~~ar « 'C Y ~2 /Yj~yy(~~~ Y~, ~3 ~F ~. I+~.%Y'ii 1k);~ ~~ ^` J S ~ .F .,~ - c h ! {~` ~4t"~` a .. ' t9u; ~ ~' F .?.t ..yY~t~J fit" 1 k $ L %( '~' d ,~k~,~"~ ~ ~R';'4~~j/~~*' F "~'~~ '~ t1 3'4 'FY i~)^e } i~~~,,~ _.- o..,-. e .. . i ~~ a - T ~ - ~- "i V c .' ~}, ~ 4 t~ #x" i r ~ a • 4 i t ~ .4'~rj~X E t •.. v ~ ~ ti c `= - `~ ~` ~, n ~' T ~~ i x ~ d t - S~ _ ~. r C n a~'~bti 5 +~ LI '`7` ~ s i ~~ H~ '~ . sc ~ t~L(~~.' ~* 7 '"'E i ,t a ~ _~ ~ ~ t Y't ~ a ~i C ~ r -" r -; 1 '" ' n ,t,a„ ~kk3'. ~ ~~a_ t`~ a Fjma c ~r`4 ~~e4t3e,dusnl '~~.+.ask.f~i~i~.,~xbc`~r`~.~;'*~~A`'." ~. ~,-'i.?2 ?~r~'~'°''~~ - „y , ` ~ 4 ~~ ~ : 4 7 ~ d ~..; ,; e '~- icy :tP ~ ~ ,}i T~'a ~'~. ~;:~ t - , "J: ~• ~ 93 ~ .q i~~ 3' S~ h~*`} tsj~ 7 r..~~ ~{b ~4 i~J ~'',,yE,~•Y u,~~ ,, ~;, ~y{Y z-`, s..~~. r i:•'~~rkV ~it~ ~ 'J,j.. tr ~ f,~P~~7w;" zS .r .. ~ ~, i?{i'A;%'~' .. { ~~ [~~} ~ ~'.s~~'F~h` St:# 3~ T6" a(4r 's4 cr ~ . ~ s 4 S.1 ~ i .a~ i t.z ~' t~ a '~e -. o -.~<'+•JW ~ ~y~~s'ry~`uyp ~~: ~,,~,,~,1 ~'~-~}yJx i~{'e 5"~ r yrv :~' ~~~~,>~ ' ~ `t'~ r a C~r.~~l"'sF ~~° `6'. r`~?~~~,~~'s 7~2 ~y a ~ C3 ~1 k,~ ~k..~ '~5,,.. ~'}'"yti.~ '` ,+~( ~F w ~ ~ 3 ~,~ ~~ 'ais ~~ k~~```` m~~',, i~rN'~~~ ~ 4e~~~~ ~~~ i~~,,~ ~ ~ .v~~"F ~~.F15~. tL R 1 ~~~ ref ~ ~~~ - hl r :f~ _. . ; .. „_ J; ~ . ( t ~rs~~Sr~ e {,~~,.,~s t`r ~t a ~~ ~~~~=3 as~r.` oAa~'~~~4"rf s env -~~ r^- _ T' _ ~ ' ? ~Ti1a q 1.,~~ ~... 14 b ?kk r. ~ ~. q2 ~ Ik ~~,E_f• 6 E t ty~ S ~i ., i ~ 'vl cif' '~, ti's ~.`f tie ~ o a.=vdr ~ u~' .. - ~~ ~ - ~# ~,a~~ ',, n.-r~~i. 5,;r~r~..r.~a,df -yr'3"w ~~ :,~ ~Sy_- s ~k~,1. ~i ~',-.t*~pt.~`.~`'~i~•a T ~ , z:' _ - t i v r,' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P~ J, 9a 1 F k,. ~ ~ ~,~ `fix ,' rt~ ~ _~~~~ry ~3 Y3y+'~. ti gxalr a +?`pp,l ~k '~il p~~, ~ 9 '~f`*~ V~ ,.r 1- ~~'~,~ ~.~r a ~i g~x'aet.+ 'fi~~~~y~1 ~.~' ~~ ~~~I~f r i-~V"~~*~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~E~ '~t ; ~ ~ ~ n . .., . . , ~ ~-.r.,1 G~.t:~ a.1 ~ . , _ _ 1 , i ~ ~ ~. ~ to x , a 7ti~ e Y ~ °.*; tiir, r: " - Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission i April 19, 2007 Page 20 of 47 5 ~'. `~> Moe: Yeah, Mr. Chairman. Justin, in regards to the Overland Road -- you know, ACHD ~'~' has had -- we have discussions with them and they had no problem with the }'~~~ realignment that is shown six weeks ago or whenever. I mean are they just basically „~ k~ ;,-~a - just trying to get some definites figured out now? I mean is the concept still approved `~ by them? ~ t t _: ~. ' Lucas: Chairman Rohm, Members of the Commission, and Commissioner Moe, yes, ' ' ; ~'' this realignment of Overland Road has been a topic of discussion for quite awhile now, ~}~ ~ as you stated, and the direction that the city received from ACHD was that we needed t ,T ri ~, ~ to act first and give a recommendation to them regarding this realignment and kind of . ~~ ' ! show them the direction that we wanted to go, largely through this plan and other ~h ~~l ~v ~" ' transportation plans that are happening in the south part of Meridian. So, staff was a . _,~,, little bit -- didn't understand their -- this comment in their letter either, because the realignment of Overland Road will take a lot more than just this plan to make it work. ; But this plan does give a concept, an idea, and a vision of what we see could work _t "'' down there. And so this certainly doesn't cement the fact that Overland will be realigned and we do believe we are delicately treating that -- that alignment as ~_~' something that needs further discussion and, obviously, you know, we will have a large '' process to make it actually happen. ~r=? Rohm: Thank you. Moe: Thank you. ;~ ~~` ~ ~° Rohm: Okay. Is there anyone from the audience that would like to testify to this i ~~ ~ application at this time? Dave. ~ -:~; Tumbull: Thank you. Commissioner Rohm. David Tumbull. 12601 West Explorer Drive, in Boise. Appreciate the planning staff report. Very to the point. As you're ~~ ~ aware, a couple of weeks ago I came and testified about two items and I think that one ~ ~ of the concems that probably hadn't been communicated between us and staff at that t ~~ point was on our request for that change in designation on the Franklin and Ten Mile ~~ interchange on the mixed use commercial. I think Anna was probably concerned that ' `~': maybe we would shift that -- excuse me. There is a pointer here; right? There is a ~.`~~K collector road right in this area that she wanted to maintain in that -- you know, main street type of a feel and my comment back to her after the meeting was that we were _ . - ; still committed to that as well. And so, hopefully, that will alleviate any concems with Fr regard to that change in the Comprehensive Plan. So, if you have any questions forme in that regard I would be happy to answer them. ~:: ~; ~~ ~,~ Rohm: I guess my only question is are you happy with the way the map is currently ' presented with the changes that staffs made to it from two week ago? ,j' y3'a7 T r ,.: `~.: Tumbull: Yes, sir. ,;~ . ;. ~~; :.~„~~. ,,, ~~ ~ ;~M .2~~ ti, f- Y _f a q '~"'.' Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission F' April 19, 2007 ~ Page 21 of 47 L ~ . ,; Rohm: Okay. Thank you. Okay. Is there -- ... `~ ~ Moe: Mr. Chairman, I'd just like to make a point. I do believe there are a couple other folks in the audience that did come up two weeks ago. I'd appreciate it if -- I'd like to ,~; hear their response to the plan the way it's been revised to see whether or not if they f.r,z~ ` have any concerns on that as well. t- ' Y`a ,~ ~ yz..a ''~~ Rohm: Okay. Mr. Bainbridge, would you like to come forward. ~. ~ ~_: Bainbridge: Steve Bainbridge. 5717 West Brigadoon, Meridian. That piece of property over here where it was medium density, to commercial, is -- is a good thing for us and think it's a good thing for that piece of property adjacent to the -- the trash -- SSC. r ,r ~` Moe: Transfer station. «,~a ;,~~~,. Bainbridge: We appreciate the change. Moe: Sir, you do know that one point is is that -- that they are not anticipating an y ~ `;'`' access onto Franklin Road. ~~ «~ Bainbridge: Yes. ~;~~; `' Moe: And do cross-access across -- Bainbridge: Yes. r, sry, Moe: Okay. Good enough. '~~' '.,~, Rohm: Thank you. ~::~~ ~ .=~~ Bainbridge: Thank you. ,, ~,; Moe: Thank you very much. ~' Rohm: Okay. Would anyone else to come forward? i;` ~? ~^ y, Mashbum: Jim Mashbum. L&M Associates. 4571 North Patton Avenue, Boise, Idaho. '~'~ 83704. I'm the one that requested the change to high density residential there and I'd ~F ~`~`~~'~ like to stand for any questions. Basically, my comment is that our main reason was not ~- ~. to try to pack a lot of people in there, it was to open up the possibility of some nonresidential, more flexibility, and stay within your vision was the reason we made the `~~~ request. And I'd stand for any questions. Z{:, <~; Rohm: Any questions? Okay. Good. ~~:~_ ;_. ~: .; ~. St;~ ~r~;:.. - ,~ -.. ~,, ~~~yy _ _ _ 17• }~4~ e • ::,~~. Meridian Planning 8 Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 22 of 47 ''"~ ~ Siddoway: Mr. Chairman, I have one question for Justin. On this revised map were any ' `' :x changes made south of I-84? ~ ~~=: ~x Lucas: Chairman Rohm, Members of the Commission, Commissioner Siddoway, no. We will go back up to those requested changes. As you can see, the requested changes south was a possible realignment of what would be this extension -- I don't _ know what this road would be called, but it would be kind of whatever was left of Overland Road if the realignment were to occur, to get it closer up to the freeway ~~ interchange. There was some -- Mr. Jewett came and testified about that and talked ~~F about -- I believe it was some topographical issues and maybe the idea of putting some ~- ~~ user there that would benefit from being that close to the interchange, like a gas station `~ or something like that. And, then, the idea down here was possibly opening this area up -- whatever -- what is that mixed use community designation to -- I may have said that ~~ ~~. wrong. ~ti: ~- - Siddoway: I think it's medium high density residential. {{~~ 1.kH"~c~ 4 -='~ ~: .x~ ~ Lucas: Yeah. Medium high density residential. Possibly allowing some language in the . ~, ..~ plan specific to that location to allow some small convenience store or gas station type use on that comer. But no change was made, because it was somewhat ambiguous on ;~` what was requested. So, we definitely noted it, but there was really no change to be ,, ~~ made to the map, because there was nothing definite beyond that. I think Anna has a ~~ ~~` :: comment. "~ Canning: Chairman and Commissioners, we did change the comer property to mixed ~.:: use commercial and I spoke with Mr. Jewett about that earlier this week and he was in X ~~~'` favor of that. Part of the reason I -- no matter how that property takes access, it will take access to an arterial street. So, it made sense -- some sense to have a use there ~ that would particularly benefit from having access to an arterial street, which would be ' some commercial properties, rather than the residential. So, we did shift that one piece '~, ' of property. _ ,f Rohm: Thank you. Okay. Any other questions of staff or is there anyone else from the ;~' audience that would like to come forward and testify at this time? M_t y t' t~r7 :.,~ ~~~ ~-• O'Brien: None from me. ;: ' , 'A Siddoway: None forme. ~~ ~ Rohm: All right. Could I get a motion to close the Public Hearing? _ .4= Moe: Yeah. Mr. Chairman, I'd like to make a motion to close the Public Hearing on t ` CPA 07-007 and CPA 07-008. ' Siddoway: Second. 1, - - :_~ ~,~ - . .cC'% .'`S 4~.' ~~~;'~ ].. x~ ~ ~) ... .~ i^1 ~ - ~; ~t, w <: ~= »-: ~~ ~ ~~~' Ji ;;. h.. -, '~ ~~~ 1'h',.y =~`,; }~Y~;~_y ~. ;: ~~;4, Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 23 of 47 Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on CPA 07-007 and CPA 07-008. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Moe: Mr. Chairman, I move to table CPA 07-007 and CPA 07-008 to the end of the meeting after -- Siddoway: Actually, we can act on it. Moe: Ah. We can act on it now. Excuse me. Rohm: Well, we will just have this one tabled and, then, we will open -- reopen them all at the same time and -- for a single action. Moe: No, you can't do -- Siddoway: We may want to do individual actions. Just take them -- Rohm: Okay. All right. Moe: Then, I guess, what I would probably want to do is I want to table this, so we can have some discussion. Siddoway: We can have the discussion now. Moe: Good point. On this one I have no problem. I think that staff did a very good job making the changes and whatnot and so it's my recommendation to go forward with approval of the Ten Mile area plan as has been revised. Rohm: Commissioner O'Brien, do you have any final comments on this Ten Mile -- O'Brien: I have been struggling with this thing for a couple of weeks and the only question I have is, you know, if you build it they will come and those are the concems I have is that as we change things now -- and I guess we were addressing that tonight in that some of the things that we have table we are going to hear it after we take care of Item 15, is that getting the cart before the horse, I think, is what my concems were. We are going to be changing designations here, but aren't those designations changed and done after we have agreed upon what we are really going to be doing with the plan itself? And maybe you're not following me very well, but it just seems like we are changing what we -- where the grocery store wants to be -- we are changing the area -- so, we are changing this area here to a commercial zone, basically. Right? I think the - Rohm: Mixed use. «:, ; ~:~_> ;,. ix'~ti';. ~, ~' <, Meridian Planning 8 Zoning Commission " April 19, 2007 ;~ Page 24 of 47 ~~ .~ Siddoway: Mixed use commercial. ' O'Brien: Mixed use commercial. This is high density residential and this is supposed to ~:R . ~,,. ;.-_;'~ be a main corridor here and it just seems to me like this is going to end up being a main ;.`~A ; comdor as well. Am I wrong in assuming that? Because of the use that it's going to provide. -;a~ Rohm: I think that the intent, Commissioner O'Brien, is there is going to be limited F access off of Ten Mile to that entire stretch through there and so even though it does .:x<~ ~~ .._».~ have the commercial flavor to it, the -- this Ten Mile area plan has addressed that and ~~ even though there will be these changes made to the map and allow for mixed use on the comer there and change the use on the east end of the project on the north -- or ~{~ south side of Franklin and recommend it for high density in that other section, the roadway system and the limited access within this environment is going to pretty much remain intact and that's -- I think that that was part of the goal of this Ten Mile project is to capture that now, so that we can kee the flow of traffic oin and chan in some of ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~~ the end use doesn't disrupt that. ~~`' I O'Brien: So, it's cast in concrete, subject to change? :; ., '';~ ~ Rohm: Yes. ,,., '~' O'Brien: Thank you. I'd just like -- that's, really, like a -- it seems like that's what we are doing, is we are adopting this thing and, then, we are allowing changes to happen later on. Rohm: Well, I -- ., ~, O'Brien: Well, I know. I mean it seems like that's the danger. Rohm: I think that the intent is to make this part of the Comprehensive Plan and each project that comes forward will, then, have to comply with the Comprehensive Plan as amended via this project and so even though we are making some tweaks to it tonight, via testimony from the last meeting, this is what will be the plan into the future. And so that's the intent is to make sure we get it right this time. So, it may seem like we are making significant changes to you, but overall this is still pretty well intact. O'Brien: Okay. You have answered my concerns. Thank you very much. ;,:;. << „~;'~ Rohm: Okay. ~~ Canning: Chairman Rohm, Members of the Commission, if I could add just one comment to that. I think perhaps, Commissioner O'Brien, what may have confused you, k~~~ we use the term main street with regard to this facility right here and what was meant by that is we wanted something that was very walkable from the lifestyle center to the transit station, something where the store fronts were close to the street, where folks ;: ~.:. } ~' , ,.. ;; ~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission ~ r" `y~ _ April 19, 2007 :'~:,•., Page 25 of 47 ~: walk up and down there. Not that it would be the main commercial street, but that it ~~' would have a kind of main street feel -- ::~ ~ O'Brien: Oh. Okay. ,.. k:~~.. _S:.i .:.:~: Canning: -- in the -- in the Andy Griffith sense of the word is what it was meant. So, by '' ~``"'` adding the commercial over here, I was just originally concerned that we would be ~~ ~- pulling the emphasis away from there. But I think that we understand and the owner of that property understands that we are still looking for that and have committed to doing r, that. ,~: ~~~~~ . ~, O'Brien: Okay. That makes a lot more sense. Appreciate it. X1:3 ,~ ~; },~; Rohm: Okay. Thank you. At this time could we get a motion to move forward with this ~~ ~ - item? ; :: ~ ~~ ~` Siddoway: I have a couple of comments. ~': Rohm: Okay. '~-! Siddoway: The -- I do agree with the land use changes as proposed on the -- the next ~s";,, ~ - map here and the one that I had the most concern with was the change to mixed use commercial. But as I think about it, the difference between mixed use commercial and mixed use residential is very -- quite slight. I mean one's just what is the emphasis on commercial or is it on residential, but both of them accommodate mixed use, both residential and commercial, and with the understanding of the -- Mr. Tumbull's ~,,~ testimony tonight that he does intent to stay true to the main street concept along that ;, collector road, that addresses my -- my main concerns with the change in land use. ~r would, myself, like to reaffirm the access management portion of it as remaining as ~ ~~~~~ proposed in the current plan with a -- this collector road being an underpass, a second ', j ~ collector road as with a full access and a third collector road as a right in, right out. That ~~ would be my only point of clarification from my own perspective. ~;;, ' ~ Rohm: Was that -- you're referring to the one -- first one south of Franklin Road as , ;~ ' being the right-in, right-out? ~ ~ ~s ,5 Siddoway: Yeah. It is in the plan of a right-in, right-out. , ' ` °F" Rohm: And you're just affirming that. ~,_~ '-; `4~~. Siddoway: Correct. If we go back one slide. It's shown as a proposed change from `;~:': right-in, right-out, to a full access and I'd like to see it remain as proposed in the plan. _.:.i is ,.. Rohm: Oh. Wow. Interesting. ~.~ ,, ~ ~~. ~::. ~~ r:, r= ~~:; _ fir, _- ~'~€ -~~;_ ~~~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission ~~ April 19, 2007 Page 26 of 47 Siddoway: I wouldn't be so concemed if the access to the same area off of Franklin had a full access, but just thinking of Eagle Road and Meridian Road and the issues of multiple full accesses within close proximity of the interchange, my own thought about doing it right the first time for this Ten Mile corridor would be that we should limit the number of full turning movement accesses between the interchange and Franklin. -; ,~ ` -; ;;-: a. ~~ =. ;:.Y: ~, 7p.. '~, ~ Rohm: You know, I agree with your thoughts that you want to make sure that the traffic flow isn't inhibited in the fashion that Eagle Road was, but, quite honestly, Ten Mile and Eagle Road aren't the same. Eagle Road is a state highway and it feeds on over to Eagle and Star and Emmett and other points to the north. Ten Mile dead ends at Chinden and it's fed from east and west and, true, it will probably have more traffic once this is fully developed than it currently does, but I don't think Ten Mile is ever going to be an Eagle Road. That's my opinion. Siddoway: It's probably more comparable to Meridian Road, which I think has some of the same issues. Rohm: Commissioner Moe, do you have some final comments? Moe: Well, as I said earlier, I'm pretty much in favor of the plan as it has been revised, but Commissioner Siddoway is now making us at least think about the right-in, right-out a little bit more, but I'm of the opinion, as you are, I'm just not too concemed that traffic is going to be -- that full access would inhibit the traffic through there. So, I guess at the present time I would probably keep it revised as shown. Rohm: Commissioner O'Brien. O'Brien: I'm fine. Siddoway: Was there a staff recommendation on this issue? Canning: I almost said Madam Mayor. Sony. I don't get here often enough, do I. Chairman Rohm, Members of the Commission, the right-in, right-out only at that intersection is supported by all the -- the traffic analysis done for the plan. So, staff had not proposed a change of that intersection. And I think Mr. Tumbull of course will correct me if I'm wrong, but I think what he was talking about was leaving the option open to discuss that further in the future through traffic analyses and things like that. And that I certainly think that that's appropriate, but I -- it would be difficult -- we'd have to -- to talk to our consultant and try and redo all the traffic analyses if we are not moving forward with the right-in, right-out only at this time. But I know Mr. Tumbull will be working with ITD and with ACHD to increase the access to that point. But if the Commission wanted to make a recommendation on that, looking at fully evaluating that, that would be appropriate. We tend not to make those kind of detailed decisions for a property. We generally leave those kind of details up to ACHD based on traffic analyses, but -- _, ~ ~_ ~} ^ ~' 4 - ~~ 1 ~ ~: ' S ii t ~` ~ I• a~ _c:...~.,, r ...~ a ~' `n~'~A'f~SBS rk,2e' ~.~~-~~~ w~;~~ ~ s., ; "k.. - ~ 4 C.;J j ~'.~=YStr~ "ns~~ y ~~' ~a ~:+ ~~, f~ ;ilfh r -_ a .alb ~eai• k ~ :: „r s . .. yy} - ~~tt 0~i ~fR X A r ~'Y 3:; gyp" 4 ,~. i _ ~' N: I~i E Y~~pp~~~~,,,, ""c~1R~~~~ .3n h +~V I ~ ,7"f~~NLrr, r t'~ ~L::---~'' ~` . N~~~w-. - ~,-,i7F t .t ~: ~-. ~~ ~~~r ~ .' "y C . '~~ ~ ~y `~~~ 7~a - ,,~y~. ',;.~~ `,~ ' '3I+1 w a~~w'&` ~ ~ ti~j4._ 2 A'it t ~.v~ i 1'Ny.Ys ~t ~ i.~ V F~;, ~ ~~: ~ ~`~ :e' ~ `~'~~ '~' .w~ ,,,,y~~ ~ r 'tom'' ~ ~~~~ x tii K ~ ~ a , ~' ' .it '>. ~ ci~ , ~y:.~ ~~-,X x sr -.~ 2'' l 1~~ +~: V ~t~. T ~hf Yr `Y~3'..~.i~t~ "~ i ~p 6 a j~ {4 :',T~: r-, .~ ~ ~ `'~' } j. ! 'r -` ~~ .~~. ~ „~;~. ~~ ,- . '~~. ,.,: ~, i~.:Y ~ 1=':=f ~}~ f~ ,:~. C4=~: T~Ya •n~: -: ;~; ;'S :_~t" >, > ,,- ,1. y. 5 ~ ~..r.. w~j ';~; .. , ~;; -` z' ., t~. ~~. ~k;i: • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 27 of 47 Rohm: So, in other words, that right-in, right-out is not specifically part of the -- of the application itself? Canning: No. The right-in, right-out is part of the plan as currently written. We did not change it. Siddoway: Right. It's in the plan as right-in, right-out. Rohm: Okay. And once this is -- has been adopted and development actually occurs, does it take another CPA to change it to a full access if, in fact, traffic studies warrant or would it just be part of the application itself? Canning: No, sir. I think -- you know, and this kind of gets to I think what Commissioner O'Brien's question was on the last one, too, is that this -- this is a different kind of Comprehensive Plan amendment for it. It is more specific. Yet Idaho state code -- and Mr. Nary can correct me -- he can be the one to correct me if I'm wrong now, but -- Nary: Mr. Turnbull can do that, too. Canning: Idaho state code still says there is -- the courts have still said these are just -- these are just guides to development. I don't -- I don't know that they have said a specific plan is any more or less a guide than any other Comprehensive Plan that's adopted. So, it's still just a guide to -- to evaluate against development. Now, we did want to get more specifics, so that we could start to work out a lot of these implementation issues and that's what Mr. Friedman and Mr. Ellsworth will be working on mostly next year is these implementation issues and this it is -that's the big one. What are the appropriate access points. We have designated some of them, but we need to evaluate those further with the appropriate transportation authorities and get those kind details worked out. So, no, it's not going to be a Comp Plan amendment to go from aright-in, right-out only to a full access point, it still substantially complies, it's just we have done further research and come up with an appropriate solution. Rohm: Thank you. That's the answer I wanted to hear. Thank you. Okay. Siddoway: Mr. Chairman, I'm ready to try a motion. Rohm: Let's hear it. Siddoway: I would move to recommend approval of CPA 07-007 and CPA 07-008, as presented in the staff report in the proposed Ten Mile specific area plan, to incorporate the changes to the land use as proposed tonight during the hearing and acknowledging the potential for further analysis of the specifics of the road system in response to both the ACHD letter and Mr. Turnbull's comments regarding right-in, right-out. Just for clarification, I support the current proposal of right-in, right-out, but acknowledge that the details are subject to specific traffic analyses. End of motion. ;~~_, ,>r~'., ;• °' ~:a: ~; ~- ;, .:~# -. ~; .a4`i ~~< :, t ~: _ a~ y; ^~ ,~ ~.: }. ~:.~: a, ~r.L,e'; .~ ~ :~a ~~, ~ %t~~ . :. f `i_ #V ,~ :{ d ,~~.`-~ r,;; ;.:,,, ~ y~ ~; ~ `- ~. . ; : , ~. ,,, .::.fi-~: g=` ~ ~+: :~;: , ; k, ; `~ ~ti ~.. .ry, ` . Y': . R~' ~~. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 28 of 47 Moe: Second. Rohm: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to forward onto City Council recommending approval of CPA 07-007 and CPA 07-008. And I presume that you support text changes to match the map changes? Siddoway: Yes. It was for both, the map change and 008 is the text change. Rohm: And, then, the text change as well. Okay. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carries. Thank you, folks. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Rohm: Okay. I think we are just going to work backwards and we are going to -- now we will go back to Item No. 11, CPA 07-003 and re-open -- Siddoway: No, don't open it. We can just act on it. Rohm: We are going to act on it. Mr. Nary, if an item has just been tabled, do we just ask someone if they'd like to make a motion at this time or is there any formal changes to -- that I need to -- Nary: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, all you need to do is, basically, you have moved all those particular items. Whichever order you want to do them in it's fine and I think it's -- as Commissioner Siddoway stated, I think you want to take the Comp Plan amendments, either singularly or together, it doesn't -- that's the Commission's preference, but you can just say we are on -- now we are back to Item 7, now we are back to Item 8, and, then, you can act on it. or six. I was using it more as an example, not the specific number. But all you need to do is say we are on Item 6. Rohm: Okay. Let's do it this way: We are going to return to Item No. 6. Item 6: Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-004 Request for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to change the land use designation from Industrial to Commercial for Jabil East Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the Joint School District No. 2 -1303 E. Central Drive (Lot 1, Block 1, Jabil Subdivision): Item 7: Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: RZ 07-005 Request for a Rezone of 9.21 acres from I-L to a C-G zone for Jabil East Property by the Joint School District No. 2 -1303 E. Central Drive (Lot 1, Block 1, Jabil Subdivision): Siddoway: Okay. Rohm: And could I get a motion? ^~ wi ~ _~,~i ~:1 ''P; ~ ~~ ~. Meridian Planning 8 Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 29 of 47 _ Moe: Mr. Chairman, I move to recommend approval to the City Council of file numbers L [' Y M.~~ CPA 07-004 and RZ 07-005 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April j ':} ~ 5th, 2007, and continuing to April 19th, 2007. E. Siddoway: Second. ~, Rohm: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to forward onto City Council '4' recommending approval of CPA 07-004 and RZ 07-005. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. :,rn, . ~ ~~ . ~? MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. r ~,; ; A , t . Moe: Mr. Chairman, I move that we recommend approval to City Council of File No. CPA 07-005. Siddoway: Second. jI. ~~ .,, ~# Moe: I wasn't done. fi ~ ~ss~. Siddoway: Oh. Moe: As presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 5th, 2007, and continued to April 19th, 2007. ~~~ ..e.: x:'717 {„ ~y ~ Siddoway: I will second that one. ' ~" r. ~.j.~ ;`~ " Rohm: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to forward onto City Council ' ~' ' ' recommending approval of CPA 07-005. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same =~~ ; - ~_ sign? Motion carried. . , MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. ,. ~~ Item 9: Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-001 Request for ~;~> a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Future Land Use Map ~ .~ ~ designation from Industrial to Commercial for the property located at 600 ~ E. Franklin Road for Thomas Comprehensive Plan Amendment by :;~ . Lynn Thomas -north of E. Franklin Road and east of Meridian Road: Item 10: Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: RZ 07-002 Request for a .;~a Rezone of 0.628 of an acre from I-L to C-G zone for the Lynn Thomas "~~ rp, Property by Lynn Thomas -north of E. Franklin Road and east of ,~~~~ Meridian Road: k hx q'..{ ~C., ~- Siddoway: Mr. Chairman? y};~ :~,, ~~~: .,~, s.. ~. :' ~ ~~ b , , ~., , ~: ~, ; ~~. _ ~: ~ ;~ ~ ~~, F+ ..`:,~, Meridian Planning 8 Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 30 of 47 '- :~ Rohm: Commissioner Siddoway. Siddoway: I move that we recommend approval of CPA 07-001 and RZ 07-002, with ~'~ the following addition: That RZ 07-002 be subject to a development agreement that y~ ,.~ incorporates the applicant's proposed elevations as presented tonight. ~,~ ~ Moe: Second. r::, ~' Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to forward onto City Council recommending ~` approval of CPA 07-001 and RZ 07-002 to include all staff report and the addition of a }~ ~ development agreement to tie down the elevations as presented tonight. All those in ~' ~ ~'` ` favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. ~ ~;-~~ MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 11: Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-003 Request to r :: ~ amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map by adding and `"; ~: ,~: amending pathway locations for the Pathways Comprehensive Plan f~,, Amendment by the City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Department: <~-~ «` Moe: Mr. Chairman, I move to recommend approval to City Council of file number CPA ~4 ~ f "~' 07-003, the Pathways Comprehensive Plan amendment as presented in the staff report for the hearing date April 5th, 2007, and continued to the 19th, 2007. -;~-; ~~ ` ~ Siddoway: Second. ~~? 1 Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to forward onto City Council recommending ~ ~`~ approval of CPA 07-003. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign. Motion ,w ::_ G<, ,~ ,`~ ~ ~ carried. "' ` -: .~ MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 16: Continued Public Hearing from March 15, 2007: PP 07-006 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 7 single family residential building lots and :,~~.~; h„ 2 common area lots on 1.96 acres in an R-4 zone for Moose Creek ~~~~ Subdivision by Moose Creek Construction - 4275 N. Jones Creek Lane: ,~; Sys ~r~ Rohm: Okay. At this time I'd like to open the Public Hearing of PP 07-006 for the sole y ~:r.; purpose continuing to June 7th, 2007. y ~' Moe: So moved. JY, ~~ 1 ~ Siddoway: Second. ... ,~- ,,,:.r„ ~~ ~ e `I _ ;: ~>; ,;, ;',, :;;x~' 3 . ~~ 4= . .7.~.J ,_~~~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission f April 19, 2007 Page 31 of 47 "~' Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to continue Items No. PP 07-006 related to the Moose Creek Subdivision to the regularly scheduled meeting of June 7th, 2007. All ,~., those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carved. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Nary: Mr. Chairman, did you do --did the Commission do the same action on the South ,, ' '~ `' Meridian Plan? I know you discussed it in the beginning. ,.~ ~~='~ Moe: We did. We went through it. ,, ~,~. :; Nary: Okay. ~,~ Siddoway: We continued it to November. Nary: Okay. I knew you had, (just -- I knew you discussed it at the opening, I wasn't ~`~3> sure if you had done it formally. Thank you. `.~+ ~''' ` Rohm: Well, I don't know that we did do it formally, did we? . . '" Siddoway: We did. ,~ Moe: Yes, we did. '='~ ~~ Item 17: Public Hearing: CUP 07-004 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a bar, the Busted Shovel, in the O-T zone for the Busted Shovel by William Kosterman - 704 Main Street: Rohm: Oh. Okay. All right. Fair enough. At this time I'd like to open the Public Hearing on CUP 07-004 related to the Busted Shovel and begin with the staff report. Wafters: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. The application `LL~Ar before you is a request for a Conditional Use Permit for a drinking establishment in an OT, Old Town, zone, by the Busted Shovel Bar and Grill. The property is located here on the northeast comer of Main Street and Broadway. The property is zoned Old Town. f-~~;. To the north are commercial businesses. To the east is the Frontier Club Bar. To the west are city offices. And to the south is the vacant Lumberman's site. The Unified Development Code requires conditional use approval for drinking establishments in an OT zone. The current and previous use approved for the property is a restaurant use. The applicant wishes to convert this use to a drinking establishment use for the purpose ' ~~= of allowing smoking within the establishment. Smoking is not allowed in a restaurant ~~°''I~ per state law. Further, the business does not allow anyone to enter under the age of 21. A site plan was not submitted with this application, because the existing building encompasses the entire property. Off street parking is not provided on the site because of this. Staff is requiring that the applicant apply for alternative compliance to the requirement for off-street parking with Certificate of Zoning Compliance for the change ' ~' ~;~~r~;z ,t;Y, r t ~~. ~,;z ~.tr ~ :,z~ ~' , i~i.'~.. ~ n ~,,pt'. r i} rA~. "~'~.~ i~~,a ~ ~ t t'- X~41~F// k ~F, ~ ~ ._ 3TI r ~~t yL i~T. w -1 S ~ri'i^.. }'yam C ;a/1 _ k"` i ,::'.. r ~. c .f i ' q. } fi ~T 4~ f s Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 32 of 47 :_, J~y.~; :~•:, ~' ..~ ~,.,5 ~~ , ~~~~ `° ,~; `~} :~, in use of this site. Five off-street parking stalls would typically be required for the size of the existing building on the site. The applicant has stated that five spaces in front of the building on Main Street and Broadway Avenue are used for parking. Additionally, the applicant states that he has a verbal agreement for parking with the property owner to the east for off street parking. Access to the site is provided from East Broadway Avenue and Main Street. Three written letters of testimony have been submitted on this application. Two from David Wynkoop and one from Carol Gabriel. Staff is recommending approval of the requested Conditional Use Permit as stated in the staff report, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit C. That's all staff has, unless the Commission has questions. Rohm: Thank you, Sonya. Any questions of staff? Commissioner O'Brien. O'Brien: In the application you mentioned that it has five designated parking areas for -- around the comer or in front. Are those specifically designated for that establishment or does it matter, as long as they have five. Does it have to be designated? Wafters: Chairman Rohm, Commissioner O'Brien, Commissioners, the parking on the street in Old Town is not designated for any particular business. The UDC requires five off-street parking spaces. That's what I was saying the alternative compliance would be required for. The applicant just stated that they have those amount of spaces in front of their building on the street. O'Brien: All right. Thank you. Rohm: Any other questions of staff? Would the applicant like to come forward, please. Kosterman: Bill Kosterman. 3048 Cobble Way, Meridian, Idaho. Answer any questions you have. Moe: Are you in agreement with the staff report? Kosterman: Yeah. The only thing is the parking is -- I can't imagine what business could go in there without -- it's Old Town. There is no parking. There is three parking -- I do have an agreement here written by -- the business next door who controls the lot behind me and he's given me a written statement here that says he does allow me to park in his lot, which is an additional four to six spaces behind my building. Rohm: Could we have that, please? Thank you. I don't have any questions. Moe: I have no questions. Rohm: You know, that establishment's been there for a long time and in my mind, whether it's called the Busted Shovel or -- what was it before? Harry's? r ._ M 1 ~~. S ~ ~~: H;' ra, i' :` ;~ i. . i' y.. n t C kc ~_ -_~ • ~ Meridian Planning i~ Zoning Commission " ~` April 19, 2007 a ~ °~ ' Page 33 of 47 .~z;; ,;{s Kosterman: Harry's. The War Eagle. It Happens. It's a very very long distinguished ~t~F,° 4,< history back to 1937 when it was built. - ~. ` .;,~ Rohm: Yeah. I had -- thank you. Enough said. Thank you. Appreciate your ..: testimony. ~~y: Siddoway: I have one question for you. Sorry. Have you reviewed the letters of f~` - objection from Sherer and Wynkoop? 4t- ~~ ~ ~ Kosterman: I have not heard anything about a Sherer. And I know Dave is apparently " ~~` a -- oh, his wife and him. Okay. ~. ~: . r Siddoway: Sherer and Wynkoop is the name of his office. '~:~ ; ;~ Kosterman: Okay. He walks by every day and he doesn't like that there is a patio out , there. So, his objection to me being a bar is that I have a patio, which I have, whether ~~ ~-~ I'm a restaurant or a bar, and that's -- I haven't seen the letters. They were not provided to me. I was told that there were letters --three letters from the same guy sounds a little ~' : suspicious to me, but I -- if you would like to read them, I'd love to hear them. :.~ ~:~~ ~ ~' _<; Rohm: We are fine. ~..~: >, t=~' Kosterman: I hear he's an attorney. ~F'x Nary: Mr. Chairman, maybe I could help clarify for Mr. Kosterman. What the issues that Sherer and Wynkoop have raised -- it is required to have a license agreement, to ,_ have your business encroach on the sidewalk, and according to their letter you don't .- J:~~ have a license agreement that allows that encroachment onto the sidewalk. The other y~,- issue is the City of Meridian does not have an outdoor vending license or vending 4`~*~ ordinance that allows you to have alcohol out on the public sidewalk. It can be on your ~;~„ property, but it can't be on the sidewalk. That's two things that are -- that that requirement that he's talking about to allow that area on the sidewalk to be used either ~ '~` `' for just sitting without alcohol being present -- being used or with alcohol you're going to k ~ - have to have both of those and that's what he raised the objection about. There was some other objections, but that was the one that was being referred to regarding the y~;, fact that -- he used to be a highway district commissioner, so he knows that is required - ~ ; to be able to have that on the sidewalk. ~, ~ :., ~~ ~'~_ -'7==' ., Kosterman: I'm sure he knows. rl+ ~'+~ t Rohm: I guess my question -- the follow-up to that, then, would be do you typically serve alcohol out on the front -- out on the sidewalk? ~:,'f,,. 7 .._, `~ ' . Kosterman: Honestly, I -- this is the first bar I have ever owned. I have owned it for a 2' year now. And all the things that the previous owner has been doing for ten years are "~~~ " now, apparently, a problem for me to do. So, these are things I'm learning as I go is ~~ ~:, a~ ~~, r. :- ., , i4: ~. _i ~ ' S!F~iNf~ K?'t . '.. F. `~~~ .~ ~~ ::~.~•~ :. y," -~ ~~ ~> E':; -:,x~~3 1: 4Y ~y~,. .~~, `' ~1 ~, ~:, -. ~~ ~: ~~k~Y ~~~. :~, ~~ Y~ w ~~ ~., -;.- . ;,,, ~ ~.~,. .."; a. '~,; }~, ~. ...,~ . :,~; ~, .1. )' _% f~,, t .~' ~.i, .. j, »YM ~ s Meridian Planning 8 Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 34 of 47 that, oh, you can't really do that, even though somebody else did. So, I'm in the process -- I have got several calls in to ACRD, they are not returning my calls. I have a specific name of the person for the agreement with ACHD for the sidewalk and as far as I know -- this is the first I have heard about not being able to have an alcoholic beverage on that patio. Rohm: Okay. I think probably the appropriate action for us tonight is we will take care of the application that's before us and it sounds like there will be a couple of continuing things that you will have to work through that won't necessarily come before this Commission, but I think we are in a position to act on this Conditional Use Permit tonight. And that's what we are here for. So, unless there is additional questions of the applicant -- Siddoway: Just to clarify. Is your primary motivation for this change to allow for the smoking at the facility? Kosterman: Yes. Siddoway: The rest of it will -- Kosterman: There is absolutely no intention of changing the way we do business. We are not putting in stripper poles. We are not changing the parking. We are not changing the trafFc patterns. The place has been there for 70 years as a smoking bar. It was there for the last ten years as Harry's as a smoking bar. When the no smoking law went in, he went down and changed the liquor license, which he did not own, from a bar liquor license to a restaurant liquor license. After two years or maybe three years he changed it back to a bar liquor license and no problem. Now, I own it and a year after I have owned it now I have a problem and that's -- this is just me being upset about the 1,100 dollar tax, but I'm here to get my Conditional Use Permit and play by the rules and I will continue forward to go to ACHD, get the permission for the sidewalk cafe and anything else I need to do. As these things come up I just keep teaming new rules. Rohm: Thank you. Kosterman: It's not a condition of trying to break the law, it's, oh, boy, there is one more. Rohm: Thank you, sir. Kosterman: Thanks. Rohm: Okay. There is nobody else that has signed up to testify to this application, but if there is anyone that would like to speak, now is that time. Okay. Could I get a motion to close the Public Hearing? Moe: Mr. Chairman, I move that we close -- close the Public Hearing on CUP 07-004. r= ~+~ • s Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission ..*`l~°, April 19, 2007 r~, Page 35 of 47 `~~ ~'~' ' Siddoway: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on CUP 07-004. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign. Motion carried. ~'>"~ MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. ;;~ : -~i . : ~ 4 Rohm: My only discussion on this is that establishment's been there for a long time and that fact that he's come forward and requested a CUP to operate it as has always been ' operated seems to be almost a moot point, but, nevertheless, it's best that he be in '~° compliance and I think that CUP should be granted without question. Any other _ comment? Okay. Could we get a motion to forward -- no, to act on this application. ~ °`n ` ~' ~ Moe: Yeah. Mr. Chairman, after considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, move to approve file number CUP 07-004 as presented it the staff report for the hearing {~ ~s} ~~_ date April 19th, 2007. And I further move to direct staff to prepare an appropriate ;; : ~ findings document to be considered at the next Planning and Zoning Commission _ ~ V 5 hearing on May 3rd, 2007. y Rohm: We have a motion. .w.; Y . . ~~ 1' ~' ` O'Brien: Second. ' ~' ~' Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to approve CUP 07-004. All those in favor say w,:, _ aye. Opposed same sign? Thank you for coming in. Motion carried. t '~`1= ~ MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. - .; =,~` Item 18: Public Hearing: RZ 07-006 Request for a Rezone of 4.38 acres from an ~~~~` R-8 to an R-15 zone for Bellabrook by J.E. Development, LLC - 300 S. - Locust Grove Road: ~ ~; t. '' ~~` Item 19: Public Hearing: CUP 07-005 Request for a Conditional Use Permit °'~' approval for multi-family residential use in a proposed R-15 zone for Bellabrook by J.E. Development, LLC - 300 S. Locust Grove Road: w"' s~~;~ Rohm: All right. At this time I'd like to open the Public Hearing on RZ 07-006 and CUP ~'` 07-005 and begin with the staff report. t`Et Wafters: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, the application before you is a s request for a rezone of 4.38 acres from R-8 to R-15. Conditional Use Permit for amulti- ,; famil develo ment in a ro osed R-15 zone and a Y P p p pproval of private streets within the development. The property is located at 300 South Locust Grove Road, approximately L~~ a quarter mile south of East Franklin Road, on the east side of south Locust Grove Road. To the north of the site is an LDS church and associated properties, zoned C-N ~ ~' i., .~.;c.. Q~' °.• ,. ~9:, -~ _- ~~ ~_ ~ {#~b ~. ,- ~~~' 4 i~+ .~ _ ~~, ~1`~-r. ~. ~:~ ,~: r ~; ~~~. r: ~~ , ~~, ~~~ ,~: ~ ~ ~' .~~ L,. ~ ~~ ~; ;~ , ~ ~, ~.> ,_ ~ 2> s `~~ - ~St ~ 4 ~; ~ ~'~ . c - ~w by ~:~ : ~ , >~. ~ r..r~ . P~~ '' ~?'`~ _ y ~'~~~~ - r~ ~1. ~~~ y ~ V~ ~ , ~;. + ~~a~ ~,; ` ~~ _ t :~,~t, , '~'" ye £ r: =~~ Y . ~~ x ~~, ~~' ~`' i~ ~~.,.: $;; ~. m ,~.,. r ~. 4+ ,,,~ ~. ~~ ,T- ri , .~" j~~~~~ A T %~~ ir~ L , cryC , ~~ =~};~ f ri ~, ,c' _'~" n: ~~' t ~. f ~~ '~ ' ;ti', . ~~,' ~~ c- n ~~~ ?~ ~r t ~r w ~ t ~ 'i F 'f < ~ ?. ~i~'. ~.t ~ ` ~ ``' ~ ''; ~ ro .c~ .. Meridian Planning 8 Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 36 of 47 and RUT in Ada County. To the east is rural residential properties zoned R-1 in Ada County. And commercial property zoned C-G. To the south is rural residential property, zoned R-1 in Ada County. And further to the south is Woodbridge Subdivision, zone R- 4. And to the west is commercial property that is zoned L-O and rural residential property, zoned R-1 in Ada County. There is an aerial view of the site. There is an existing house and associated out buildings on the site. The applicant is proposing to construct 34 multi-family residential units, consisting of attached two unit and four unit structures at a gross density of 7.76 dwelling units per acre in an R-15 zone. Each of the units is proposed to have a two car garage with a 20-by-20 parking pad in the driveway. A proposed multi-family development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan future land use map designation of mixed use community for this property. Access to the site is provided from South Locust Grove Road. The applicant is proposing to construct private streets within the development, with 27 foot wide street sections, within a 37 foot wide cross-access easement, with rolled curb and gutter, and a five foot wide attached sidewalk. Because the proposed street width does not allow for on-street parking for visitors, staff is recommending that the sidewalk be removed from the internal side of the street around these two four unit structures and the road widened to allow for parking on one side of the street on the external side. A 25 foot wide landscape buffer is required along South Locust, as shown on the landscape plan. 27.7 percent of usable open space is provided on the site, with walking trails, a large grassy open area, and a gathering courtyard in the center here that will help to create a centralized community and include seating, shade trees, and community artwork. A pathway is proposed leading from the residential portion of the development through the common area here and a ten foot wide multi-use pathway will be constructed along the Five Mile Creek at the northeast comer of the site. Elevations have been submitted for the buildings on this site. These are the two unit structures proposed along the south boundary. These are the front and rear, left side and right side elevations. In the center here you will see the colors for the materials that will be used on them. This is a two unit structure proposed at the northeast comer of the development. Right there that leads into the common area. This is the right side elevation. This is the side facing the common area. The left side. And the elevation facing the street. And these are the four unit structures. This is the front elevation. Rear. Right side and left side. As you can see these are attractive buildings that incorporate at least three different material types, varying roof lines, windows, and recessed entrances, among other things. This slide shows elevations of the site from Locust Grove Road from east and from northeast. This slide shows elevations from the southeast, north, Locust Grove entrance, and an overview of the gathering area. And the last slide here shows an isometric view of the site from the southeast in relation to the surrounding properties. Besides requiring conditional use approval in an R-15 zone, multi-family developments also have to comply with specific use standards regarding site design, common open space, site development amenities, architectural character and landscaping. Staff has reviewed the subject application and found that the proposed development does comply with the standards listed in the UDC. A written letter of testimony was received on the application from Ronald Hodge, President of the Woodbridge Subdivision Homeowners Association. Staff recommends approval of the subject application based on the ~~~' ` ,d" /F7 r.,.. i •.'4 ~:~~1d ~ TJA `+' ~` ~i~W~vy ~ + .~.'"Yi 't~7 ~~t~t . 4- r r } {~4 ~ } r~ S 5 ~ I. 1G~_~+~~i ~~ fi 'd'~4~'°~ ~ -5 ~„yj~S.p h a~ s J 1.~ H w~'i ~ a 3f _~ ,{ (S~ ?~. ~'yl~n {.r jt 3 t ~t t~, ~ A n.~.e yX p t), ~~f~V y.'.. ! - ~ 4'~~y~~!J~~N'1 ir.~~ ~. iy{~`~' :~:Y "`41'~^E . _ ~ k ~ f4 iC ,~t ~~ ~ P~...S'~7' f.N~'4: rr~T . . .~ i•.~. , ~~r - ~ ? ~ - ~_ ~ ~ ,1 _ 4 { +: `ye't ~. ~ r~ b a .r~d;~ ~ rt~ "`h ~ - i~~ w. ~ ~'~"~~ iii y ~ ~'~ a .S~ ~ ~µ~ ~"'.y t~ 4 .{ k~~~ ~ its ~ t', V rrk_,C,~~ls~ ~ S ~ , F~,, ~{~Ga G c p Y~4~~! rx.` k1Ar~~F~ {. sr ik4 ,~~;~~ ., .1y~n~"'c~~n w ~r ;h'k ku'~ ~ ~`:` ~a,.rt __ ':mot st ', i'1,~;~ #ao'd ' 1~-, ~ i'z + f 1cV Rv + ~, ~: ! ~ :~ ~~ ' r` ;'~"~" ~~' ;fie s x ,~' ~~~ ~` ~ ~ #*Jw, ~ ~,~r , ~ tp+ -; ~. ~ . , r 9 ..~ ~ tqt~r~. u i n. ~ ( .,7 ` .t„~7 .w. ~ r,,.., ~' a= .~.'`' ~ ~{'iha~°i r•9`!+. F#"~'Y':C f~E s~.'~'~ r ~ ~ ,i ~ ~,~,~i' §~`r,L ~ } ky ~ ~ + ~~~ ..., R,~ x,u ~ h {, ,y;.Ck ~ ate. ~ ~,'X d - ~! ~ }~ - 4 4~ NH* k''cg~~'~: - r i r ~i ,r~ ~ i € !y, .~'~ JL' ~'~ ; N ~ ~?<*,'! ,~ ~~'k.'Y, . ~ . 1; t~ i~ Y,~ ~ x. ~'1 a 3~ ~ r ,~~ r^ i .=t~ t ,.~~ a, s, ~ ;i ~ 4 ~`y x t kY/' - ~ t, t 5 y.. k'' *E ~.~~ ~ ~'.. sir ~~5 Jt ;'i ._ ~~i ~ ~ ~.- ~~ ~-.~ _. a ~- ~A9 4 + ~ ~ ,~ a ~ ~ r N rn rv f?: ~,. ~ ~Y4~.~h~--~>#.~F^~~~ ~r ~~ ~:~.~~`~f ~.":cS`1~.L. at~~,~sq rFr .~~~, ~ aF.'~Ri -~ ~.,,~.. ~ ~ t; ¢_, . ~, is `. i'.'y3, jt .! x~ Meridian Planning 8~ Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 37 of 47 findings listed in Exhibit B and the conditions listed in B of the staff report. Excuse me. That was findings in D. That's all staff has, unless the Commission has questions. Rohm: Thank you, Sonya. Any questions of staff? Would the applicant like to come forward, please. Nickle: Good evening, Mr. Chairman, Commissioners. Shawn Nickle, 148 North 2nd Street, Suite 101, in Eagle, here tonight representing Bellabrook Subdivision -- or Bellabrook Condominium Development. I'd like to thank staff for their extra added attention that they gave to us regarding this project, getting it designed in a way that would meet the codes, Comprehensive Plan, and also provide for a better overall development. Those black and white plans are rather difficult to understand, so, hopefully, you guys got a chance to see those colored elevations that were up on the screen. I do have large boards here that I can show you if you'd like to look at those. I'll try to be brief and not ramble on too much. As staff has indicated we are asking for a rezone from R-8 to R-15 and a Conditional Use Permit for the multi-family condominium development. The property is on four point -- or includes 4.38 acres. The Comprehensive Plan for this area is mixed use community, which allows up to 15 units to the acre. Our proposed density is 7.76. Again, staff has indicated we are asking for 34 individually owned units. We are providing parking to each of the -- to each of the units. We will provide two covered and two outside off-street parking for a total of four parking spaces per unit. Staff also indicated that are -- Siddoway: Can you point those out. That's what I was just trying to figure out. Nickle: Could we get the other colored plan up there? The black and white is kind of hard to -- Wafters: Which one, Shawn? I don't have a colored one. The files are too large. have problems getting them in the presentation. !.... Nickle: Right there. That will work. That one back there. One back. Sony. Thank you. Okay. So, to answer your question, Commissioner Siddoway -- I'll kind of go through this. This is the private road. The units here, as you can see, we have -- there is driveways that go back to a garage and this unit here. Two garages here. And a garage beside -- that's the four unit plan. Siddoway: So, there are two garages that face the front street -- Nickle: Yeah. Siddoway: -- and a garage on each side in that case? Okay. Nickle: And the way this was designed by -- by doing the private road -- we initially had proposed a service drive. And to help with addressing and fire concerns, we did go the private road route. So, what you actually see here is amulti-family development that is ~,.~4 ~~; r. n. ,'~~ r , 'k n ~ 4,Y. :~i y;: . ~. ; .f " ~ rc_.: _'.. '~ • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission -~ April 19, 2007 Page 38 of 47 ,. ;'. {;, sr i ,ti,~.• ~~;~~~} ,~ designed more with the look of a single family residential development with the private road. We tried to design it so it wasn't completely garage dominated, so you have got garages up front here, but, then, you have garages on the side. These two unit concepts have the garages on the side and, again, there is that four unit development, two on the side, two in front, and so on. So, it was nice that we were able to get four parking spaces off side -- or off street, even though it's a private street, for each of the units. O'Brien: I have a question on -- Nickle: Yes, sir. O'Brien: -- on the left side of the -- of the picture, you have a single unit there. And, then, your other diagram it showed units nine and ten. Is that a single unit or is that two units there? Nickle: This is two units right here. O'Brien: Two units? Okay. It just shows -- Nickle: Right. O'Brien: -- side by side, instead of head on. Nickle: Right. O'Brien: And that is the end of the flood plane? Nickle: No. If we can go to the next map. Sorry. The other way. Yeah. Either of those. This indicates the flood plane and the floodway line. O'Brien: So, the backyard, if you will, of those -- of that section nine and ten, does that have much slope down? Nickle: It does -- it's a gradual slope, but right here -- here is those units that you spoke of, sir, and this area right here is all outside of the flood plane or the floodway. O'Brien: And that's a park, I guess, or -- Nickle: And that's the grassy area that will be one of our amenities. Then, we have the pathway that goes down to the future regional pathway and along the creek. O'Brien: I'm just -- it's kind of strange to put a unit isolated like that in a park and pathway area. It seems like it would be kind of -- not much privacy. It's just a thought or concern. t.+.t n ~ ~ ~ a ~ tit '! ~F . ~, ~ ~ w~;~~ ~M~~~ rs ~,, ~~t~ ,~ ~. ~ ~! ~~ !pi r . 7k d.,b,~w "y + ~ 'K ~'.~ ~1' • ,s~'~ s; y1p 'r,. ~~ Yfl'r -tom, ~'! ~ ~+ ~~~~ Z F. l ~~rti kt • ~'}~_ F a. *ti •! ~' ~~~=~ ~t~~ d 4 r~ t ~.. r r F± p~ 1 [ •S i ykliCa ~S~~}r' y~ ~ -: ~ ~,~,:„may ~~~ ~~t• „„~~ 1 7 ~ ~ ~ i ~~ ~ °-~:y :k~ ~ ~ _ ~~ ~., ,~-;~ ~. ~, $3 4k t~ ~ •~ {fit. .{ y ~.+ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 ~~ :: Page 39 of 47 Nickle: The common area within the development encompasses 45 percent of the site. Within that we do have 27 percent usable open space as defined by your code, including that grassy area here, which is just going to be an open area. There is not ! going to be any play equipment in there. It will just have the pathway that runs through to the east. And, then, we have a common gathering area in the center of the ~~ development with public art and a pathway through that. Twenty-five foot buffer along Locust Grove Road. That is all included in that 45 percent overall. The gathering area, ~`~~ grassy area, pathways, all account for that 27 percent of the usable open space. We are providing fencing along the west, south, and a portion of the east of the development. We do believe this is an excellent area for this type of development. As you know this is a mixed use area that includes, as staff has indicated, a church to the ~~~' north. Single family residential to the south. OfFce commercial to the west. You have the police station across the street and down. Water Tower. You have city parks within a mile and ahalf -- or, excuse me, within three-quarters of a mile. Downtown is a mile and a half from the site. We are adjacent to that regional pathway. There is industrial to the north along Franklin. It's a definite mixed use area. We believe -- and this is not a high density development by any means, at 7.7 dwelling units per acre. We feel that multi-family development in this area does provide diversity in housing type and also does provide for a mixed use, which is envisioned by your Comprehensive Plan. Again, ' . I have elevations here that are colored if you would like to see them, if you would like to ~r,~~;l take a look at those up close that I can pass around if you'd like to see. Oh, if you have got them, great. I'll just show them to the neighbors, if they'd like to look at them as r<<` well. Again, staff did an excellent job at analyzing the requirements for the multi-family development. I won't go into any detail, but they are in your staff report, unless you'd like me to answer any questions regarding those. Those have to do with open space area ratios, parking, maintenance and care taking units and things like that. So, that's , ~ all I have as far as my application. We do -- we are in favor of the recommended ~~ conditions of approval, including the revisions that staff has indicated in there, some of `~~ which we have taken care of already, but we are in agreement with those conditions. will stand for questions. .~,, '~ `' ~ Rohm: Thank you, Shawn. Any questions of the applicant at this time? '' Y O'Brien: One more. '~' ~;,~~ Nickle: Uh-huh. O'Brien: On that flood plane area where you have some trees, et cetera, I mean how is '`'~'~ ~ that really going to be used. Are you not going to have any picnic areas or anything like that in that area? Because the common area seems like it's awfully small for the ~' number of units you have in that. Will that be able to support -- ``°'~!_ Nickle: Mr. Chairman and Commissioner O'Brien, this area right here, again, is all -- is ~~~i;;= completely outside of the flood plane. It is going to be grass and landscape. So, it's an .: open area for frisbees, football -- it's -- this area down within the flood plane is going to ~;;'; be more of a natural area with the pathway going down to the future regional path. We ~,t a! ~~ ~y i E~ r jj'1 C l~~.-. ~. ~ __ ~";3 ! '~ ~s7~ 141+•44 i.x;7.~ t i t, - G. - r ,_ .. ~' t ~l '-'~J. ~'~~ a~w' ~f~ L ~ JJ' y ~ ~ 1 , ~ n~ n~ i ~- E .~ •. y~ ~ ~~ ~ ~L i -'pl4 ~!. '~ F ~. f .J Kf'- n r~.a ~,i ,~ . ~k`~t ~r~Z~iP H ~•, ~~ ~~~ r 5~,,~4 r "~L"' s ; y ~ ~~~ k y~ ~~ ~ 'i'+.+,,. 1Yt F'yk '~ t^` ~ ~ ~ t7 Y.'%4'm xC y . ~3 ~ ~ ~I rVx ,.~ t~ ~ < Y R -. ~ ~ ti+Y W -.. C~'.. yF'rk ~j~~ ;~'' 6 4;, ~ 4,kS }!~ 9, '[yl, , ~ • . d: ~.: ~~a Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 P 40 f 47 age o ~`~ ~,~ are going to construct that path. But we are counting this area right here as -- it becomes a usable recreation area, in addition the gathering area that's more of a -- more of a social type of amenity. .:-;~~' O'Brien: So, I guess I don't know -- and maybe someone else could help me out here ~.:~: ```~ as far as what size does a development area have to have before they have a plan area `; " or park -- mini park in this case, to support that. ~~ ,..~~ Nickle: Yeah. Mr. Chairman and Commissioner O'Brien, your staff report -- I can give you the page number, but it -- Sonya does go through an analysis of the open space s~~. and I think she does a really good job at indicating -- on amulti-family development like this each unit has to -- is required to have a certain amount of open space provided. So, this design that we have does provide for that, in addition to the amenities that are r '~~~' Y;' required by code. h ~,: ."_ '~~-~~` ,< O'Brien: Okay. ~~ ~ Nickle: So, I believe, staff is comfortable with the open space that we have. z O'Brien: Okay. .:;, Siddoway: Mr. Chairman? - ~ Rohm: Commissioner Siddoway. Siddoway: Shawn, I'm just curious. Your primary motivation for going private streets instead of public, was it in order to get the difference that ACRD will allow with a public >`~ street or what was your reason for it not being a public street? ~~~ u7 ~~' Nickle: That is the reason for the -- originally for the service drive. As you know, most ~, ~ ,y~ ~ multi-family developments, apartment complexes, things like that have the service drive. ; Those are causing some confusion with fire and police getting in there with addressing _ and so by doing the public -- the private streets, it does allow that addressing and those ;; safety concerns. But to answer your initial question, using drives and private roads w does help with those widths and those right of way requirements by ACHD. ~~_ ~~~~; Siddoway: Okay. ~= r~ ~~ ''; ~~? _. Nickle: And, in turn, that helps for a better design on these type of developments. Siddoway: Okay. ~3: ; Rohm: Any other questions of this applicant? Thanks, Shawn. Okay. Jeny 't ~ Cunningham. That's quite all right. Ma'am, would you like to come forward. Please " ",z~ state your name and address for the record. ;.: 3 rF~,;: ~;_~~ ~.., : ~, _,<t. y. i ~,;~'-, .{ ~'~j t' `e: `F, ,- ;t, Meridian Planning 8~ Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 41 of 47 Jordan: Christie Jordan. 1702 East Bowstring. Mr. Chairman and Members of the Commission, I own one of the properties in Woodbridge that is directly north of this proposed development and I just have a few concerns that may be addressed in the staff report. I glanced through it, but didn't have time to read it in its entirety. I'm just concerned that the CUP 07-005 is not accepted, but that the rezone is accepted, will that potentially open the property up to multi-family rental type development, apartment development. And I'm just concerned -- or want to know if it's going to be guaranteed that this property will be sold as individual units, as opposed to being a large scale apartment rental complex and just because of the fact that I feel that that could diminish our property value. And those are my major concerns. I think -- I had some concerns about roof heights, that type of thing that I believe that they have addressed with some of the revisions to plan with the hip roofs and things, so -- thank you. Rohm: You bet. Thank you. Mr. Cunningham. Cunningham: Thank you, Mr. Chairman and Commissioners. Jeny Cunningham. 1974 East Bowstring. I not only live in Woodbridge Subdivision, but I also own three acres that are adjacent to the property that actually show the R-1 there. So, this is the section of property right here. And, first of all, I'd like to go on record as saying I hope that Ross does build here, because I really like the drawings he's put together. They have been very nice. I think they are pleasing and would actually fit in with the community very well. I don't understand why there would be a request for a change in density, given that they are proposing a development that's 7.7 per acre when it's already zoned eight units per acre. Don't understand why you would grant that. My third point is that I'm concerned about the private road. The other design that you looked at last time and approved, that wasn't here, because it left a nice city access -- sorry. You want me to be right close to it. The last drawing -- do you guys have copies of the last drawing that was proposed when this was originally changed from an R-1 to an R-8? Rohm: I do not. Cunningham: The reason I ask is because it did have city streets and it left access to the property to the east, which given the current -- the current design, the only access that would be there for either of the two property parcels that I'm speaking to, either the one that I have or the one that my neighbor owns, it's a 50 foot stretch. So, not having a hundred foot of frontage is a limitation to doing any development behind this development. Did not have any access. So, it has to stay a private road. And I'm concerned long term about isolation. Like as you drive down Ustick, you still find little pockets of three acres here and two acres there and one acre here and I'm hoping that the -- that the Commission is taking that into consideration as you change zoning and look at different developments before you. And my last point is that I would encourage the Commission to have a development agreement, since these two zoning -- rezoning requests within a six month period, I guess I'd like to see that the Commission hold the developer to a particular plan and that that's agreed to. Thank you. Rohm: Thank you. Yeah. Come on back up, Shawn. ~~!t ~ ~~, Meridian Planning 8t Zoning Commission ~. ,'.;;,;,i April 19, 2007 Page 42 of 47 ' ` ~"' ~ Nickle: Again, Mr. Chairman, for the record, Shawn Nickle. And thanks to the ~.~, ', neighbors for -- for showing up. To answer the first lady's question, our intent -- and it's ,a ,; ~'~'± throughout our proposal and application -- is that these are going to be individually owned condominiums. Your staff report has conditions -- the requirements to come -- ~~.~~'~I for coming back and the procedure we have to go through to change those and that is ''~''~ our intent. These are going to be a high quality residential multi-family development . As you can see from the elevations that have been submitted, they are not your standard apartment complex type of building. Therefore, they are going to be marketed ! towards the individual ownership. To address the gentleman's question, if we could go - .,t '`~°` ~' ~~° back to -- I guess maybe the site -- the vicinity map of the area, Sonya. That's pertect. _,~;~~; And the entleman indicated -- and I believe he owns this ro e 9 p p rty right here and, then, there is a separate ownership of this property with the flag. He is correct in that we are , ;- changing our application and we no longer have a public road and that public road did , stub to the eastern boundary. However, he is in no different circumstance than he was in the last time our application was approved, because he is still a landlocked parcel back here. This parcel in front of him does have a 50 foot wide flag that he does have access to -- or that this property does have access to and a public road could be built in .~ there that would, then, provide access to that back property. That was all taken into M consideration and we met many times with staff to make sure that they were , ' comfortable with the way this was designed while we were proposing those private ti roads and staff has indicated that that is an acceptable way to leave these properties, that they are convinced that they do have proper access for future redevelopment of those -- of those outparcels. I think that's all that was addressed. I'll stand for any questions. Rohm: Thank you. Any questions of this applicant? Y ~, Siddoway: Are you able to meet the conditions of the fire department as presented in '~~ the staff report with your private road? Nickle: Yeah. We -- Mr. Chairman, Commissioner Siddoway, we designed this around Joe's comments, police comments, and your staff comments. And, yes, they do meet ~~ all the -- all those. Rohm: Question of staff before you sit down, Shawn. The staff report indicates that you're going to remove the sidewalk on one side of the street and to widen that street somewhat. Will the additional width now make that roadway acceptable to Ada County _ Highway District or is it still not in compliance with -- _:. Canning: Chairman Rohm, Members of the Commission, it would make it close, but not quite. But ACHD is looking at coming up with some different standards trying to reduce ~~~ those a little bit, but the fire department generally is not supportive of any reduced widths. It's a little different on these multi-families, they have a little different feel about ~,; it. It still wouldn't meet public street standards. ' ~x ~ ~?~ ~dC~ to ~' ~ y i ;x ya ~~~'~' 8. ti ~-.tiy~^~L xrr` ~ :fir:. ~ 1 7~w ~.; t;' 1 k. .. ',.~ "6 8 z' ~' ~ _"tr ! y h. + r ~~~~~ ~ E ~ ~ ~~n ~h.r x + .. f' ~ ~ _ . ~ ~1 f 9'' ~.: tt~ ~' ~ ~,~ji ~ ~ ,'l~l, ~t ~.") v~- .F, ~ ~~ ~, ~ 4~ '~ ~- ~ .; 1 ~~Y{ y F F ~iI 4 ~ ~ _ j.tfH ~ Y~ l"rq~4 ~ ~' ~!' .. ~}Q ~~~~~ ~ t ; lI S 7 {i Q ~ ~~.t t . ~~ ~ i Meridian Planning 8~ Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 ~> Page 43 of 47 Rohm: Okay. That's the question. Thank you. Okay. That's all. ~~~ ,~;~:;.:I Siddoway: Follow-up question for staff. Anna, have you verified that there is enough .; j width in that frontage to accommodate a public road in the future? I . ~ ,, ,; Canning: Chairman Rohm, Members of the Commission, Commissioner Siddoway, it is ~~~;'; 50 feet. However, that would put -- it would -- there wouldn't be any land use buffer to ~'''r~' the -- to the -- they could do a reduced street section and move part of that right of way ~ ` ~~"~ into the landscaping, so that there wasn't directly the road on the back of Woodbridge. °° ~~'~' We did look at this issue and Mr. Cunningham -- thank you. I was a little surprised ~' ` when I saw on the records that we did have a landlocked parcel back there. ~' ! Particularly, that's all in the flood plane and the flood -- you need to not talk from the audience, sir. I'm sorry. But there is a piece of property there, but most of that is in the o` ?' floodway and the flood plane. So, the development potential of that, as in all of this '~-~~' property here, is severely limited by that flood plane. It's a rather wide flood plane and, ~`° you know, ACHD has a drainage basin here, because this is a very large natural drain ~!,' ~= ~ and you can -- you can see it coming through Woodbridge as well with their open space ' ''~ ~ system through here. So, a large portion of that is not developable or has limited ~ ' ' ° development potential. So, we felt that it wasn't necessary to accommodate a lot of ~ - traffic. They could do flag lots and get four units back there, might be appropriate, but we thought that there was really limited to this upper plateau as far as development ~ !~ ~ potential. You know, we may have been mistaken in that I'm not sure but that is how , , ~~ we looked at it. There is always a question of when a private street goes in, that ~x _ connecting another property to a private street, it isn't necessarily appropriate. When -- but in this instance the private street accommodated the multi-family use. So, it's the ~ =~ s circle we kind of go in every time we have amulti-family development. We like to get interconnected ones, but these multi-family developments tend to be designed around private streets, rather than public streets. ;. Rohm: Thank you. ~::, Canning: Did that answer your question, Mr. Siddoway? `~~~ Siddoway: Thank you. Rohm: Any other questions before we close the Public Hearing? ., ;~ O'Brien: I have a question for staff. About this development agreement, you know, I t,~~ noticed in the -- in this report that you didn't think one was required and I guess I just `'r hesitate the fact that it was zoned from an R-8 to an R-15 -- I don't understand the logic from that -- it just seems like it leaves it open for something else outside of the --outside `' ~` of what's in that agreement. Canning: Chairman Rohm, Members of the Commission, Commissioner O'Brien, the a ~. the R-8 does designate up to eight dwelling units per acre, but it is for single family homes. It's not -- it does not allow multi-family development. So, in order to ask for }s ~ ~ ~,, - ..- ~ ;~; `+ a~ ~'~ ~~;~3~ ~ ~ { Y ~~. ~ ~ ~ '~~f? gt:t P t ~-, ~'. ~ ~ -~ F.F. +w-;~ v a- ~ ~k. ~yn~q~st~ tf'~• e a ~T'b; +~ '. ~ ~,~ , r~.. `-~ 4_~ +. _ ,~~ ~~ ~ d ~. ^n;:f~ [ .F r r ~ ~} ~~ S~ ~.. __ - _. {:$ ~x y:., to ~~` ~~~ ~~1 l ... ~ . 4iI~ f ~. -4"f '~1t 'k~~ Yti ". L 4 ~ ~ 1- ,C ~~~ e*~'"'~ 4t~ b ?T ~F '. ~,'~`l F ~- :~r.~ Qom.:. - .. :{w~5 ~ • _ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 44 of 47 multi-family developments such as this, they had to request a higher designation, so -- ' and they would not have been able to meet the dimensional standards for single family `~' homes in the R-8 zone, too. But with regard to the desire for a development agreement, -~ that may very well be appropriate and is probably something that Council would be in favor of, in all honesty. With the R-15 developments, they are very site specific. You '~ ~' need to know what unit you have got, you need to have it placed on that lot in a very particular way. So, that may be a very appropriate suggestion as put forth. ~~ O'Brien: Okay. Thank you. Y ; ~' ~ Rohm: Shawn, did you want to come back up? ~~'~'' !,3 Nickle: Mr. Chairman, again, Shawn Nickle. I apologize, I was going to address that. think that's a fair question by the neighbor and we would be more than happy to enter into a development agreement to lock us into that site plan that we have shown you, if ~~,z you're not comfortable with not having one. And, then, staff did explain why we have to '` ~,~ ask for an R-15. We are actually under the R-8 density, but the multi-family is only -~:~~ allowed in the R-15 and above, so -- `"'~' Rohm: Thank you, Shawn. Okay. r`y4, Moe: Just one question. A little information for me as far as changing that, though, if ,} T they would have done a PUD, would that not have needed to go to an R-15 at that . v `,`' point? I'm reading these days. =~~ ~ Canning: Chairman Rohm, Commissioner Moe, that's a very good point. The PUD as ts~s,`~ we have changed it in the Unified Development Code, though, specifically says you cannot ask for a PUD for the sole purpose of waiving requirements. So, they weren't `'~ ~ ~ able to go the PUD route on that one and they didn't have a mix of types of product, so ~; ~,z'='F I they were not able to ask for a PUD. ,~;, ; `''~ Moe: Well, when I need some sleep I'll start reading these, so I can find that. ~:> ~:a', Canning: It will work. '~ ~ Moe: Thank you. Siddoway: Mr. Chairman, I move we close the Public Hearing for RZ 07-006 and CUP 07-005. <~ Moe: Second. Rohm: Okay. It's been moved and seconded that we close the Public Hearing on RZ 07-006 and CUP 07-005. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion ~° ~~ ~ carned. _ ~: 4.w' y1 .. ~•t~''~i'rfJkh~t (° c a ~ }~~F '~ r ~' YF'+M k~~~ + 4 „r `:krd ~`, a t• ~i .v ; ~~i4~~s ,r 'a ~i~ ~~ c ~rx :5 .~ -'. `. a `4 _ iy 3~,~~ ~r~ -r f T'~ ~. {r'3 '. V 'Q i . ~ ~. L i`i ~44 ~#~ t F x *lt~~ }~t f 7 !., 3J^FF r`~!~ Yip .~1' ~ 1 1Y IT~~ ~~~ ~ u, i 4 i lp~~ ~ r~ ~ ~~i g Tij'~h;.~ fix, - :.~f: '.}': t~ ~~w S , W (/~ .,,,~ ~ -~ 1 ((r z r }g7'~ `. , ~ E ~z, ~ ar ~._. _ ' ~~ ~ I ~ ,. ~~+ ~~ ~~ C k p r- h r n17'O'~^Fl '. ~e~ ,. 3 h k ;?'' ~~ ~` ~ .,~ ~~ Meridian Planning 8~ Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 45 of 47 :~ . MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. _ .; _.~~ Siddoway: Mr. Chairman --did you want to take a poll or anything? ',~ Rohm: Just if any individual Commissioner has some final thoughts and certainly this is °~ ~` -' `: the appropriate time to exercise that right. Commissioner O'Brien, do you have any final <~' thoughts? ~~ ~~~ O'Brien: No, I don't. I think I had my question answered and part of the concern of that was leaving it open for someone else to be in the zone for the R-15, instead of R-8, that '$ 'r;r. there might have been some conflict, I don't know, downstream, but I don't see that, "~~~ based on the area here. So, I'm good with it. ~i ~ ' ~' Rohm: Okay. Commissioner Siddoway? `~~ Siddoway: I'd actually just like to commend the applicant for bringing a product that has `~` a residential character and quality similar to a large -- you know, very large residential home -- it's afour-plex but the way it's -- it's not just a large box and it's not all -- it's not ~_.,~ '""` , all garages on the front, it's got some good articulation and I think it will fit in well. So, ' ~ with that I will make a motion to recommend -- after considering all staff applicant and ,~ ~ ~~~ , , public testimony, I recommend approval to the City Council of file numbers RZ 07-006, = ° CUP 07-038 and PS 07-002. That's -- with -- there is no PS on here. The PS is a _ private street application. Is that needed? Wafters: Chairman Rohm, Commissioner Siddoway, Commissioners, private streets do ~ not require Public Hearing notice. They typically run -- they are typically approved at >r ~< staff level, but because the other applications that were accompanying it require a ~' ' Public Hearing, it accompanies those applications. ,~ :. ~ ,~ s Rohm: So, we just have the rezone and the CUP. °-t: - Siddoway: On the agenda. Okay. There is a separate private street application. So, 's' on the RZ and CUP, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 19th, ~= 2007, with the following modification. I recommend that RZ 07-006 be required to enter ~~ into a development agreement that would incorporate the site plans and elevations as submitted and presented tonight. End of motion. .~~ ~~t O'Brien: I second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to forward onto City Council recommending approval of RZ 07-006 and CUP 07-005, to include all staff report, with the =~~ aforementioned modification. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion ,;; carved. Thank you, folks, for coming in. ~' ,,._ f ~' '` MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. ` ~' r:: ~~ ,`y, ,~Y fi~` ' fits • s Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 46 of 47 ~,. ;,~, ~,: ~~,- i Item 20: Public Hearing: PFP 07-001 Request for aPreliminary /Final Plat approval to subdivide Lot 13, Block 3 of Vallin Courts Subdivision to create two (2) new lots for Benewah by Walker Homes, Inc. - 2673 North Ridgebury Avenue: Rohm: The next item on the agenda is to open the Public Hearing on PFP 07-001 for the sole purpose of continuing it to the May 3rd regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Moe: So moved. Siddoway: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to continue Item PFP 07-001 to the regularly scheduled meeting of May 3rd, 2007. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Moe: Mr. Chair, I move we adjourn. Nary: Mr. Chairman? Moe: Oh. Nary: Mr. Chairman, before you adjourn, this is Mr. Cole's last meeting. I don't think we made note of that at the beginning -- or at any part of this meeting. But Mr. Cole is leaving the city as well and his last day is also tomorrow and I didn't want to let that opportunity pass without making note of that. Cole: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, Mr. Nary. I said I wouldn't cry. Thank you for that. It's been an honor working with this board. I don't get to talk as much as I'd like to, being the Planning and Zoning Commission, not the engineering commission, but it's been a real honor. I would like to introduce Scott Steckline, who will be filling in in my role, so you will be seeing him in my seat for the rest and I hope he does a good job and enjoys working with you guys as much as I have. Thank you. Rohm: Thank you. And just for the record also, Mike told me he was doing absolutely nothing tomorrow. Nary: How will they notice? Rohm: Well, with that being said Mr. Moe's motion to close the Public Hearing -- Moe: No. To adjourn. .: ', Y: ~* ;,~. ~; ; ..,. ~.., >,, ~. ~_;,: ~ ~~ o-: ,: ;.~; ,, ~~ :;z ~; ,t. ~ ._y~~ :,,; z :f~ ~,:h~: ~; .~ -#, -,, - i k l rL ~ l : ~ J y, ~~.. ~~N ~Ya's r _w~s~ u .r ti r-^,Y pYC Ql ~t'F_-~ •'. ~~'~ ~:l ~ l =__ -~}.- ` ~, .. -:~. ~~-.R~:^ ~,4 ~ l~' .... ~'Y O Meridian Planning 8 Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 47 of 47 Rohm: To adjourn. Siddoway: Second. Rohm: All those in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:15 P.M. (TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) APPROVE CHAIRMAN AEL E. ROHM ~~ ~~~ ~~ DATE APPROVED ATTESTED: WILLIAM G. BERG JR., CITY CLERK } ,`!i.. ;~: ', s ,,~ 4 ` .; ~:-~ =:~~< ~~ .; °~~' ;`, 1~: ~~:, '4g-' Y`~.?F ''ti :~+;: ::;>. .±ft ; n'~ ' `•ry y ri ~ -', ~., 1.~ _..:I.i~ A_ ~•Y~a r ~i y :`Vi`i I a~ Nei -' ', Si-(4.. ~~, ; r c •} f -~. April 16, 2007 CPA 07-002 -,~ MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING April 19, 2007 ~~)~ APPLICANT City of Meridian Planning Department ITEM NO. 4 REQUEST Continued Public Hearing from 4/5/07-Amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map for the south ~~ Meridian area to expand future land uses designations to include the land east of McDermott Rd, south to Lake Hazel Rd & 1 /2 mile e/o Under Rd south to 1 /2 mile s/o Columbia Rd, east to 1 /4 mile w/o Cloverdale Rd for South Meridian Area CPA ~- `' AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See Previous Item Packet /Attached Minutes CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: No Comment CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: . INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: Letter by Don Roberts & Ryan Amold/Letter by Claude & Gayle Sheffield/Emall by Dave Taysom Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meeflngs shall become property of the Clfy of Meridian. .: _., ~x.ri we ~~~ :, ,-.;~_ ~.~,~. sr 0: i~`G ~..~s'. e ~- c. ; .4-~ ~'{: r _i. K r j'`. April 16, 2007 CPA 07-009 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING April 19, 2007 APPLICANT City of Meridian Planning Departmen# ITEM NO. 5 REQUEST Continued Public Hearing from 4/5/07-Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment to add 4 new designations to the Future Land Use Map and include residential uses in neighborhood centers for South Meridian Area - AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: C{TY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCWOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: COMMENTS Sep CPA 07-002 Packet OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meeiinys shall become property of the City of Meridian. ~y ~- i ~a ~~ s~~ ~~ ,. { :yi+ij a t.: Q~ r ti ~~ ^ [~~~ ' y~i y< ~ ;x~y~L t i,~f 1 j .7. a i ~ta~~~b F~~~ ~'~ C ~ ~i ~s~~t cV;!(L ~~ ~tri i#~{ 1t+~~ '~ 4 ~ ~Sai *r~ '' ~ ;: ~kl ~' ~" `~ ~ t~.~.} 4`',i ~'`~ ' ~~'~ ~~~ r 7Y ..: ~~'~ w i~i s ..~r ~dl.S sj'.r R . , . _'.. r (. 5'' ~,~< • ~`"'~ April 16, 2007 CPA 07-007 `~~ MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING April 19, 2007 ~~;•~ APPLICANT City Of Meridian Planning Department ITEM NO. 6 REQUEST Continued Public Hearing ftom 4/5/07-Amend the Comp Plan Future land Use Map for future Ten Mile Interchange are to modify various future land use designations & create several new future land use designations for the Ten Mile Area CPA ``ay bordered by Under Rd to the east, McDermott Rd to the west, the Union Pacific RR Line to north 8,1 /2 mile s/o Overland Rd to south 5~a AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: See Previous Item Packet /Attached Minutes OTHER: Con#acted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials pr®s®nted at publk meetings shall b®come property of the city of Meridian. ,: , r ,w~. , ,.. ~ :7 > ~~~ ~~ ~,~,,,! .al 3. r yf. ~,..4 ~.9: .~l~i ~ ~ -„`~~ C~ ~J~L f iy~ i~~~~ ~' .:. 1 yY `[~j~~t ~i: t„r,~ k rry b hY.`3~+ ~ Cam' ..r~T. ~;a.. _*. '~'~\.!'.y ;'y. kA ...F_.:. r.... .. ._.. -. 4 3 ~ 4,• y ~ S.Li .S...T"'d' IX * ~ }'f~.{ st.. ~p Y ~ 2 i`,~i ~~. :i~ ~` ~ 4,: 3r-~~ ~Y a~~ t.i '~z ~ E }~, fit i~ c ;'S r ~'+ ~'iCe, ... i ,,. ~.4~ ;i April 16, 2007 CPA 07-008 MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING April 19, 2007 APPLICANT City Of Meridian Planning Department ITEM NO. 7 REQUEST Continued Public Hearing from 4/5/07-Amend the Comp Plan by adding the Ten Mile Interchange Speclflc Area plan as an addendum to the Comp Plan for the Ten Mile Specific Area Plan Text -generally bordered by Linder Rd to the east, McDermott Rd to the west, the Union Pacific RR line to north 8~ 1 /2 mile s/o Overland Rd to the south AGENCY COMMENTS ~s CITY CLERK: See CPA 07-007 Packet CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Matertals presented at pubUc meetings shall become property of the City of M®rtdlan. ~ a ~ t. S ~ ~.` + ~ ¢~~ ~~ ~ i ,.hR ( ~ x 'F ~,'~"', 1 o~y i I Y .t~~ 4+e~~[t '~N.,.y ~,s ;. ~., _,~~! 4,' ~; .~' '' ' x,, ~ M'~,L ~iiq i •:: 1 n ,~> -~ ~ `,' ~'~ e" r~S' 6 ~.:~ ~ .r,..`~t~ `~,` .(r.4 ,. y;1 ~. ~-~ ~, ~l ~s c~;,. l...} l~p 'yam t l «K j ,I4 ~~ s ~ r ~; ~ . Y ~~ ~ ~ pk i ;. Y:'..~ o' ~~ ~i ~~~ ~ ~j F ~ ~~k ~. L ,,[ ~ 2 .~~' tY .A p C a,i ~ I ~ ~~~~~~ a ~ ~ ~., k ~ n' A~ r, r ~t .~a~ ~ ~ .~ 7~ E! ~; t k ~f k_{ . l~iE z ~ ,. ~~~~,~ +' s i C~ April 16, 2007 MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING April 19, 2007 APPLICANT City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Dept. ITEM NO. S REQUEST Continued Public Hearing from 4/5/07- Amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map by adding 8~ amending pathway locations for the Pathways Compressive Plan Amendment AGENCY ~ COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: See Previous Item Packet / Attgched Minutes OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ~' , !_ ~ 3t ~y1 J~ Y ~ `~6 ,~~ K i ~`<,.. ~ ~ ~' A _ti r } ~3u t:.* ;~,~~ . ; > ~ ¢r ~'".G v CPA 07-003 1~ 1 • • "~ April 16, 2007 CPA 07-001 '''~ MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING April 19, 2007 ~. APPLICANT Lynn Thomas ITEM NO. 9 REQUEST Continued Public Hearing from 4/5/07 -Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the future land use Map designation from Industrial to Commercial for the property located at 600 E. ;;. Franklin Road for Thomas CPA -north of E. Franklin Road and east of Meridian Road ~~ AGENCY COMMENTS ` CITY CLERK: See Previous Item Packet / Atinched Minutes CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: ..r ;,;~ CITY ATTORNEY >a' CITY POLICE DEPT: - CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: ~~'~ CITY WATER DEPT: 'F''., CITY SEWER DEPT: ; ~~ CITY PARKS DEPT: , MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: `' SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ~ry# : CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: , %~~`: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: , SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: ~ IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: ~:~ OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meeth~gs shall becom® property of th® City of Meridian. r~~:~ <:: ~~ ~`" z ~: ~, ~ ru r4~ ~~ ~ ~ F ~, ~nr 4 _ ~'i 3 s -:~~5 xa s ~ F. p ~, '~'' x s t ! . ~~~ i~,~ 4z ;!~=3 §': ~ ~~ ~~ ~k.~ ~~~ ~ H: ~k~}~ ~ E Y '~ 4igqi ~ .. J' ..C :v.YI k.3 ~a~ + , ~f l +~'.~ '- yy ~ 3 '~ !'3 ,t ~k z ^h iir April 16, 2007 RZ 07-002 MERIDIAN PLANNING 8. ZONING MEETING April 19, 2007 APPLICANT Lynn Thomas ITEM NO. REQUEST Continued Public Hearing from 4/5/07 -Rezone of 0.628 of an acre from an I-L to a C-G zone for Thomas CPA -north of E. Franklin Road and east of Meridian Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: COMMENTS See CPA 07-001 Packet OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meeflngs sha0 become property of the Cffy of Meridian. ~~ a ~_e~r a,1 ~ ~>,, ~~, ~:~i ~ _. ~. ~ ;a~,#E r~~-~ir'V t w " i s z~~ if 5 ~~;,~ ~~~:. ,:~} ~~ `~ ~ ~~ ~ n ~ y ~~ ~{• i~ F C,! spy, X `~`' i4 J:~ ;YSI .h ~w. J: Fi-C ~~~~; 1~ \' "Y .;c 4 } R - w - .S • ~_ `1e4~er,r r ~zz ~ % l d~1 u ~ L 4 i-~~ E~ 3~ ~? ~??F ~~ ~ { a,~ ~t ht ~ {@p.. C nuy~ ~~ f f:?,~3. ~ J'-Fr qi { ti':4 { .. 3 ~ 31~ - .' y~ - April 16, 2007 CPA 07-004 :~ MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING April 19, 2007 ~~~' APPLICANT Joint School District No. 2 ITEM NO. REQUEST Continued Public Hearing from 415/07- An Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan j' future land use map to change the land use designation from Industrial to Commercial for Jabil East '''1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment - 1303 E. Central Drive (Lot 1, Block 1, Jabil Subdivision) AGENCY COMMENTS .' CITY CLERK: See Previous Item Packet /Attached Minutes .~~~ Si F~,t~ ~' CITY ENGINEER: ~';'~~ CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: ;' = ~ CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: ,~ ~~ CITY FIRE DEPT: ;~ b'~ ~; '~ CITY BUILDING DEPT: '~ '~' CITY WATER DEPT: ';. CITY SEWER DEPT: ' CITY PARKS DEPT: ~~~ MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: ^'` NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: ~~ SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: r,;' IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: ' OTHER: ~~`~; Contacted: Date: Phone: ~'~ Emailed: Staff Initials: Matodals presented at public meetings shall become properly of the Clfy of Meridian. ~ - ~~~'~ ~~ 1 ~,,a ,7~ ~ r *~' ~, r: ~; p i ~ i;~3 c~ ~~'~~ I r `~ ~ W a:.~ ~`y~*f x ~~~rs~ ~ w$9t 1T~, c~~ , si i ,fps ti -', 5 y t t ~- i~ i X~~~ 1r'~t,~~ fti x'C'.~„1. - ~ ? t1 M ~ M vVF+u ~ ¢~~ IC jy? F ~' ~ it 3 s ~~ j i. r ~ r y N q 7• ' i ;. F ~'~_~ dl~ ~ ~4..FT.~ '`~ I!'z rw~.w. ~; r ~rr~.~ 5 s~ ,, gr~ ~ x~ ,d~ It t ;1? L'~FS ? ?5 i ~ `4;.,- - ~~ iz a~a : h i, e i ~ jFF~~1 n ~ ~ { ~ ~ 1 ~ a 1 . ! w~r ,,, ~, v;~, - 1." +~ ~ ~~ ~~Gfr r ~"~ ~''S~~ ~ - ~;.y _ q~~' .: ~ 'i a7 in r~r ~ ~`T ^ f f ~9,,it :, ,~ ~~ "I .. -.;~ t:.>, ~~ ;~ =' r, ,~ '~ ~'. {,i ::1 "., a'' ~' ~ ~,. i~ '=~ `'~' April 16, 2007 RZ 07-005 MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING April 19, 2007 APPLICANT Joint School District No. 2 ITEM NO. ~ Z REQUEST Continued Public Hearing from 4/5/07 -Rezone of 9.21 acres from I-L to a C-G zone for Jabil East Property - 1303 E. Central Drive (Lot 1, Block 1, Jabil Subdivision) AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: See CPA 07-004 Packet OTHER: Contacted; Dote: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the City of Meridian. r r~ : '~ r !y y. •z§ ~+rA ~ 1`" i ~ i ~ti h~ M1 J~.4..~ .~.,, rJ.1' , I t ~ '~ ~ t ~ rb 3 j;, li'1 h . 3°+ ' ~ 4~{{9L k~l Y «~~ J ~. 4 j }: ~~.f~'k~' `'4 ~ .f ~•k Y. 1 ~Qi~ 4 s ;;, •~ -~ ~ ~ ~ , ~~_:~~ ~7rr~, ~~Y ~wZ `V ;~ ~;, ``t$~ I: ~..r~ ,,; :;; f `.r:;t ~~'} ,,.,, 1 .:~ 3 y~ a::. ~ : YI„ :;~ April 16, 2007 CPA 07-005 MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING April 19, 2007 APPLICANT City of Meridian Planning Department ITEM NO. ~ 3 REQUEST Continued Public Hearing from A~/5/07 -Amendment to the Comp Plan Future Land Use Map to change the land use designation from Industrial to Commercial for Jabil West Comprehensive Plan Amendment - 915 E. Central Drive (Lot 2, Block 1, Jabil Subdivision) AGENCY COMMENTS o~ CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: See Previous Item Packet /Attached AAinutes OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the CNy of Meridian. ~; .:~ ;.,~rs, ~ .~ 1 ~.; ~,. ~-~ ~ t `:, ; a ', T~ ~ ~ j ~ ~~ ~ ~,.ti ~_~,~ ~ y; t_ ,, <. ~ 'z `l ~L{ $ ~n~ J y .~~`~ ~+ ~> ,~ .: W. ~~ ~ ~'~ ~a ~.~ t tW y ~ k;; ~z.Sr ;..a i ~:.r '~liir ~S i'; ~' .k.c ~.~.~ Y ~' V~ y .,ajn? S i`d ~ ] '~ ,~i~ ~ E'r y . 4 ~ r -' ~ Y i :..~ ~ ~ April 16, 2007 CUP 07-003 MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING April 19, 2007 APPLICANT Joint School District No. 2 ITEM NO. ~ 4 REQUEST Continued Public Hearing from 3/15/07-Request for a Conditional Use Permit for apublic/quasi-public use in an I-L zone for Joint School District No 2, Jabil Subdivision - 1303 E. Central Drive AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: `:~{! CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: ,; , CITY ATTORNEY } ~ I . '.: CITY POLICE DEPT: ~x CITY FIRE DEPT: .~$ ~~# CITY BUILDING DEPT: .R ~'~ `~ CITY WATER DEPT: ~~~,~ ~.t ':`" CITY SEWER DEPT: .,,4 a CITY PARKS DEPT: „~~ ~' MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ":~ SANITARY SERVICES: '4 'r'~:~ ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: h CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: _ IDAHO POWER: See Previous Item Packet / Attached Minutes See Attached Staff Report -.-'~ INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: See Affidavit of Sign Posting `~ Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: 4: `~~ Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. a': , t~~a 9 ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ Mj +h ,.;~ k~ I,fet k H ..z - IJYj~~ .[qty i4 r Q +* } t r~• 5 ~~ h U ~~ i Z..~ :~2'-:r4-. ~ t'. ~~ Y" .},;~a: f >. !sit' a: ce~~ z~a ~i~ J ~~f ~` r'c"R t i~ ~ a ~ ~,w t ~. 3.~ 5..~£;: ..F:~ i{~'. 'i 'Y :i 4..,Fi off r4iy. ~, ''~ ~ u~ r ;A -:r :~,, ~ ,,~ ,'' ;~ 3'. ~.. z~ ~;' ''~ '";,tdF ~ ~ ':: ::,;; ,. ;: {+_ ._ i ~' ;`~ _, Ji :~~- :, ~ ~; ~.;j ._: _,,~^ ;urt -s~~, K% Ct;1 v~~l ~:: ~, ~ ~ z:. r.:;T :~a w~„ 0 0 April 16, 2007 CUP 07-001 MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING April 19, 2007 APPLICANT Darren Blaser ITEM NO. ~ Jr REQUEST Continued Public Hearing from 3/15/07- Conditional Use Permit for an 11,000 square foot multi-tenant retail building on .75 acres in a C-G Zone for Jamaca Me Tan -North of East Fairview Ave and West of Hickory Ave in Lot 3, Block 1 of Mullane Subdivision AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See Previous Item Packet /Attached Minutes CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at pubtlc meetings shall become property of 1~he City of Meridian. k~ti:, • ,~,~,;~ .j~ ~} ,~ r `~~'{`~I ~Y ~~ ~r:~w 'af ~~ -~~-, .~~ ,'~ <aw ~~~ April 1 b, 2007 PP 07-006 MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING April 19, 2007 APPLICANT Moose Creek Construction ITEM NO. ~ 6 REQUEST Continued Public Hearing from 3/15/07-Preliminary Plot approval of 7 single- family residential building lots and 2 common area lots on 1.96 acres in an R-4 zone for Moose Creek Subdivision - 4275 N. Jones Creek Lane AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: COMMENTS See Previous Item Packet /Attached Minutes See Attached Request for Conifnuance OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. -, ij~,~w +~~ rl Y ~ F'~ °~ y~ fir', ~~. F S. [ n ~ _ .(K C.I ~ k't 1: 2:. '.~k ~;.: ~z~ ~ eta ~ r ~r$ j, --3 ', ; h 1 ~.4` ~ ~' ~~%... _?afa.'._ . f • `~~ April 16, 2007 CUP 07-004 ;;~f ~ MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING April 19, 2007 APPLICANT William Kosterman ITEM NO. ~ 7 ~~< REQUEST Public Hearing -Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a bar, the Busted ~~~~ Shovel, in the O-T zone for the Busted Shovel - 704 Main Street `~ AGENCY COMMENTS ...~~ CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: ~~' h'-3'G _;: ;: ,yl i~ }'~ 4 ~, ` ,` ~- ,'* s See Attached Staff Report Alo Comment CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: See Attached Comments CENTRAL DISTRICT WEALTH: See Attached Comments NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: No Comment SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: See Affidavit of Stg n Posting /Letter by Sherer & Wynkoop Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the City of Meddlan. ~ ~~ ~ I ;t; {r~ f~ fi~ ,~ ~,,t s' + ~. ,~~ ~ '~ ~1 a ~ _ ~~Ii i. r' ,~~ ,e r ~': r;~ ~: ..~~ ~. I+ 4:; i ~~ ~ri o;;~:; r.. u;~ ~ 4~+a!'j ~ ~' f C~?` `'$'~ ~`~ a. F.:~...~. .._. r...,~Y~ ,.,~.. .. ~,_. 3. ~ 1 ~'''t F f 1f- ~ _. ~ h di k.~, Ar April 16, 2007 RZ 07-006 MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING April 19, 2007 APPLICANT J.E. Developr~lenfi, LLC ITEM NO. 18 REQUEST Public Hearing -Rezone of 4.38 acres from an R-8 to an R-15 zone for Bellabrook - 300 S. Locust Grbve Road `~ AGENCY COMMENTS ::,; CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: ~!~~ CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: ;~' ''~' CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: _,; CITY WATER DEPT: %`d: t;~~~a~ CITY SEWER DEPT: No Comment CITY PARKS DEPT: .;a - MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ~f~ -;{ ~ ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: See Attached Comments °;~ S,'tt~ i -. "~ CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: See Attached Comments NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: ~, SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: ~?~ IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: ~~ OTHER: See Affidavit of Sign Posting /See Attached Elevations ~. ` Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ~ ~~- ~ . ~ fiy~ t;f Vet : i!`;;i ,l, USt -mot` '~ 7 , `''. Y k ~~ fi ~~ - ~S ~'K£ tih t ~%i pp{I ~•~,..~ } t 4'; z '. ~~,~ j;,3 ~~ +v ~ ~: a W .~ ~ .: s:~i! ~ _ ,~ ~~i ~:. `~~ ~ , a~/ r.' ~~$Y E ~,~.1. t ` }~d s 1~ ti t >~. e. :t ~' H~4i 4,,.T1, ~ 5 ,'f, r '~ ~ _ ~, ! ~ ~~'~ April 16, 2007 CUP 07-005 T . MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING April 19, 2007 ;;~ APPLICANT J.E. Development, LLC ITEM NO. ~ 9 ~~'~ REQUEST Public Hearing -Conditional Use Permit approval for multi-family residen#ial use in a proposed R-15 none for Bellabrook -300 S. Locust Grove Road ~3. . ~~~ ~ AGENCY COMMENTS ~h ?'` CITY CLERK: See RZ Packet CITY ENGINEER: „`' ~,.., CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: ~'~~' ' CITY ATTORNEY ~ry; ;. ..: ~~~ CITY POLICE DEPT: ~~` `~t CITY FIRE DEPT: 4 , ~_~: _~~~ CITY BUILDING DEPT: ~- ~,:~_;Y CITY WATER DEPT: ,, ._ ~~" - ~:'1 CITY SEWER DEPT: s} ~ ., .j CITY PARKS DEPT: ~' ~A~~ MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ,~ ~~ =`~~~~ SANITARY SERVICES: '~ '^'_ ~: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ~ ~ ~ CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: ~~;. ; ~°`. ~ NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: ~ . ~ ; ~ SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: , ~~;,~~. ``~ ~~'' IDAHO POWER: '< ;' INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: ~'~ " Via OTHER: . ~~~,"'. ~~ Contacted• Date: Phone: w; , Emailed: Staff Initials: , ~~ ~+~ Materlais presented at pubNc meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ,. ,;~ _ ~ ~ zKls3 ~. ~'~ ~ r.L":i~ t . ' i :~ ~ r'# ,~' ;,' ~ t ;~ ~. . ,~, ;,v, '~ .. ?~~, ~, ~,; ~ .: ~ r ~.E~ :: 4x 7.. i~~ "„'> ..r r -e :; -•~h,.- ., 'Y ~~ ~~~~~ April 16, 2007 PFP 07-001 °~~"" MERIDIAN PLANNING i~ ZONING MEETING Aprll 19, 2007 APPLICANT Walker Homes, Inc. ITEM NO. 2~ REQUEST Public Hearing -Preliminary !Final Plat approval to subdivide Lot 13, Block 3 of Vallin Courts Subdivision to create two (2) new lots for 13enewah - 2873 North Ridgebury Avenue ~° AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: ,5',. CITY ENGINEER: ::;~; e"' CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: See Metro for Request for Continuance '~ _: ry CITY ATTORNEY =;,v CITY POLICE DEPT: -~~ CITY FIRE DEPT: t `,I ?,:~ CITY BUILDING DEPT: ~,:~~,~i ~~ CITY WATER DEPT: ' a~''` CITY SEWER DEPT: NO Comm@nt y, CITY PARKS DEPT: ~_ ~`'~ MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ;, ''~ ' SANITARY SERVICES: ' ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: See Attached Comments ::, ,, F" CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: `+' IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: `' OTHER: Contacted: pate: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: . Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. u. - ~.F a,i ='. A `~Y.t ~ 5~.~ -. ~ 1 1~.L.-iCf' f 'fix 3~ 5~. i~ ~! -~ {~~.ej 'hr ~~r~ ~ n. ~ ti> i ~ t ~'~ ~ r ~ ~. a~i h3 1' F ~~` r' Y 4~`+7 I~ C~: U '~"J'7 k ~ 4-... y ~ T ~t> ~~ ~ ~*r t ; p'--' ~ F'+ t 1 4