1985 10-15C,
A G E N D A
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING
OCTOBER 15, 1985
ITEM:
•
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 9, 1985: (APPROVED)
MINUTES OF SPECIAL PQEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 23, 1985: (APPROVED)
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 30, 1985: (APPROVED)
1: ANNEXATION & ZONING REQUEST BY CECIL THOMAS AND TERTELING TRUST # 7:
PUBLIC HEARING:(ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS)
2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERPQIT APPLICATION BY SAMUEL & ROBERTA
LYTLE FOR HOME BEAUTY SALON: (ATTORNEY TO PP.EPARE FINDINGS)
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING OCTOBER 15, 1985
Meeting called to order by Chairman Bob Spencer at 7:30 P.M.:
Members Present: Walt Morrow; Moe Alidjani, Jim Johnson, Jim Shearer,
Tom Cole:
Others Present: L. G. Hawley, Kathleen Hawley, Gary Schaffer, Roberta
Lytle, Sam Lytle, Bill Nary, Clyde Weber, Clair Miles:
The Motion was made by Morrow and seconded by Cole to approve the minutes
of the regular meeting held September 9, 1985 as written:
Motion Carried: All Yea:
The Motion was made by Morrow and seconded by Alidjani to approve the minutes
of the special meeting held September 23, 1985 as written:
Motion Carried: All Yea:
The Motion was made by Alidjani and seconded by Cole to approve the minutes
of the special meeting held September 30, 1985 as written:
Motion Carried: All Yea:
Item #1: Annexation & Zoning Request by Cecil Thomas & Terteling Trust #7:
Chairman Spencer, this is a Public Hearing and the hearing will be conducted
under the rules of City Ordinance #446:
Chairman Spencer opened the Public Hearing: Is there someone present to
represent this request?
Mr. R. Clair Miles, 530 Bighorn Drive, Boise, Idaho 83709 was present.
Mr. Miles was sworn by Chairman Spencer.
Mr. Miles, I am Vice President and General tdanager of Western States Equip-
ment Company, the State of Idaho has condemmed the property that we present-
ly occupy on Fairview Avenue and served notice that we need to be out of
this location by June 30, 1987. It is our desire to move our corporate
headquarters to this property we are requesting annexation and zoning for.
We do business in four states and look forward to coming to Meridian and
should bring about 125 jobs. There were no questions of Mr. Miles and he
advised the Commission Mr. Clyde Weber, Architect was also present and
would explain the concept plan .
Mr. Clyde Weber, 5155 No. Leatherplace, Boise, Idaho 83704:
Mr. Weber was sworn by Chairman Spencer:
Mr. Weber, I have here a copy of the drawing which was delivered earlier
to City Hall for your review prior to the meeting, we are looking at a
fairly large parcel of property with approximately 600 feet of frontage
on Overland Road on the South and the Freeway on the North. The proposal
is for one large building with a single large main en"ry~ .
MERIDIAN P & Z: •
OCTOBER 15, 198
PAGE # 2:
There will be employee parking to the left of the entrance and visitor
and customer parking to the right. There will be a security gate that will
keep persons from entering the balance of the property.which will be
fenced. Mr. Weber went to explain which areas would be paved and which
would be concrete. Mr. Weber explained the rest of the concept as shown
on the drawing with regard to location of the different buildings, display
areas and landscaping. The Company wants to make a nice front door and
also a nice area along the freeway. We will fence the ditch on the East
Boundry and leave that ditch open. As far as utilities are concerned the
biggest item would be water and sewer which. are not provided by the City
on this side of the Freeway, therefore we are proposing that the City
allow for a septic drain field for sewage and probably for a well for
water. I will be happy to answer any questions you gentlemen have .
Alidjani, is there any well or any existing water system available at this
time?
Weber, there are two existing homes on the property at this time with wells,
these homes would be removed whether the wells are large enough for this
project is not known at this time.
Spencer, have you seen Central District Health's latest comments?
Weber, Yes, the indication is that we have a high water table in this area,
which was just checked, they are recommending that a septic system be allow-
ed as long as it is an alternate type system, this would probably mean a
mound type system with a lift pump. We have no problem with this, I have
been involved in several projects between Boise and Meridian where this has
been the case and they work fine.
Johnson, how many acres are we talking about?
Weber, 16 ;, there is one acre on the West boundry that has already been
annexed and the rest is in the County.
Morrow, from my point of view I do not see any problem with either the
septic system or the well, it looks like a good project to me and I think
it would behoove us in Meridian to have this project.
Spencer, for the record the orginal application requested a CC Zone, the
application you are requested is not allowed in this zone, I have before
me a letter dated the 23rd of August where you requested a CG Zone, which
allows this useage, is that correct?
Weber, Yes.
Johnson, I think this is the type of thing Meridian needs and the jobs it
creates in the Meridian area.
Spencer, have you reviewed the comments from Ada County Highway District?
Weber, Yes and we have no problems with their comments.
Cole, I agree with the comments, it would be great for Meridian, the only
MERIDIAN P & Z. • •
OCTOBER 15, 1985
PAGE # 3:
problem I can see and it is not their problem that they are creating it
but sooner or later it is going to develop on that side of the Interstate
and somehow sooner or later you are going to have to get sewer and water
over to that side and I realize this is not a large enough development to
handle entension on their own, but sooner or later when it is extended
over there they are going to benefit from it, I think some policy ought
to be established or something for a fund that development puts into for
cost of the extension. I think the City needs to set some kind of a policy.
Morrow, I believe that the late comers charge or the participation program
that was recently passed by the City Council covers those kinds of things.
Whoever extends it out there, whoever else joins on pays their prorata
share.
There was discussion on what the enforcement on something like this would
be.There was also discussion on the subject of establishing a fund.
Spencer, is there anyone else in the audience who caishes to comment on this
application? There was no response. The Public Hearing was closed.
Alidjani, I have one other question, what is your timetable for construction?
Weber, we would have to start construction in April in order to be out of
our present location by June 30, 1987.
The Motion was made by Morrow and seconded by Cole to have the City Attorney
prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions.
Motion Carried: All Yea:
The Motion was made by Morrow and seconded by Shearer that the Findings
reflect a positi.le recommendation to the City Council.
Motion Carried: All Yea:
Item #2: Public Hearing: Conditional Use Permit by Roberta Lytle for Home
Beauty Salon.
Spencer, this hearing will be conducted under the provisions of City Ordin-
ance #446, is there anyone present to represent this request?
Roberta Lytle, 1440 West Cherry Lane , Meridian, Idaho:
Mrs. Lytle was sworn by Chairman Spencer:
Mrs. Lytle, I am here requesting approval to place a Beauty Salon in my
home at 1440 West Cherry Lane, I placed a drawing in my application show-
ing my location, I do have suffi^ient parking and I have no objections
from the people around me.
Spencer, you do understand there will be additional hookup fees?
Mrs. Lytle, yes this was made quite clear.
Shearer, there will not be any changes to the exterior of the house?
MERIDIAN P & Z: • •
OCTOBER 15, 1985
PAGE # 4
Mrs. Lytle, no, there will not be any change to the exterior of the home.
Morrow, how many neighbors were opposed?
Mrs. Lytle, none, I was able to visit with everybody with the exception
of the Church behind me. I did have a Conditional Use Permit in the house
already for a bookkkeeping business.
Alidjani, are you still using that?
Mrs. Lytle, No, I am working as a hairdresser full time.
Spencer, is there anyone else present who wishes to testify on this applic-
ation? No Response. Public Hearing closed.
The Motion was made by Morrow and seconded by Shearer to have the City Att-
orney prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law on this application.
Motion Carried: All Yea:
The Motion was made by Morrow and seconded by Alidjani that the Findings
show a favorable recommendation to the City Council:
Motion Carried: All Yea:
City Clerk, I have one item before you adjourn, Mrs. Brewer has picked up
an application for a rezone and will probably be on the next agenda for
this application, does the Commission wish to have a Hearing Officer?
It was the consensus of the Commission not to have a Hearing Officer if
this application was filed.
Being no further business to come before the Commission the Motion was
made by Cole and seconded by Shearer to adjourn at 8:00 P.M.:
Motion Carried: All Yea:
(Tape on file of these proceedings)
APPROV
.C. SPENCER, HAIRMAN
City Clerk
yor & Council
&Z Commission
Atty., Eng., Ward
Stuart, Mitich, Fire,
Kiebert, Police,
Hallett, Statesman
galley News, ACHD
NIMD, CDH, ACC,
ACZ, APA, BRA
FILE ( 2)
MAIL ( 2)
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
THE TERTELING TRUST #7 ANNEXATION AND ZONING
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
AM BROSE,
FITZGERALD
B CROOKSTON
AllorneyA U10
Cwneelws
P.O. Box 127
MMWIAn, MMo
83!14
TNpAOne BBBdM1
The above entitled annexation and zoning application having
come on for consideration on October 15, 1985, at approximately
7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 728
Meridian Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the Commission having heard
and taken oral and written testimony and the applicant appearing
and having duly considered the matter, the Planning and Zoning
Commission makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That notice of the public hearing on the annexation and
zoning use was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to
the said public hearing scheduled for October 15, 1985, the first
publication of which was 15 days prior to said hearing; that the
matter was duly considered at the October 15, 1985 hearing; that
copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio and
television stations.
2. That notice of the public hearing is required to be
sent to property owners within 300 feet of the external
boundaries of the land being considered pursuant to 11-2-416 E,
.tt -: ,.:
~7
Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that
this requirement has been met.
AMBROSE,
FITZGERALD
B CROOKSTON
AtlorMys YM
Counwloro
P.O. Bo%147
MMONn, W,11o
!7814
TNpNaN BBBMl1
;)_ ,fir-y^,`~.. w.
3. That the Planning and Zoning Commission (P S Z Comm.)
received both oral and written testimony.
4. That the property included~in the Application for
Annexation and Zoning is described in the application, and by
this reference is incorporated herein; that the property is
generally described as being in the southwest quarter of Section
18, Township 3 North, Range 1 East of Boise-Meridian.
5. That the Applicant is the Terteling Trust #7; that the
owner of the parcel is Thomas Farms, LTD., a limited partnership.
6. That the property is presently zoned by Ada County as
AP-2.
7. That the property is adjacent and abutting to the
present City limits.
8. That the property included in the annexation and zoning
application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian.
9. That the entire parcel of ground is included within the
Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service
Planning Area as defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan.
10. That the Application for annexation requests that the
parcel be annexed and zoned (C-C) Community Commercial but which
request has been changed to (C-G) General Retail and Service
Commercial with the proposed use being a corporate headquarters
for Western States Equipment Company including sales and
AMBROSE,
FITZGERALD
8 CR001(STON
Allomeye Mb
Coumalon
P.O. Bo. lZ7
Msrl0bn.141w
NM2
servicing of Catepillar Tractor Equuipment.
11. That the Applicant is not the owner of all the property
contained in the annexation and zoning Application; that the
Applicant does contain requests for annexation and zoning by the
owner; that the owner of the parcel involved in the annexation
has requested to be annexed and zoned by the City and the City,
if it does annex the property involved, would be doing so at the
owner's request and the City would not be taking any unilateral
action to annex said parcel.
12. That the property is contained in the Mixed Use Area
between I-84 and Overland Road as shown on the Meridian Policy
Diagram of the Comprehensive Plan; that the Comprehensive Plan
states at page 22 regarding the mixed use area: "Probable
mixed-uses for the areas could be service commercial, combined
higher and medium density residential, open space uses (as a
means to buffer highway noise), motels and industrial."
13. That the parcel is contained within the Meridian Sewer
and Water District; that said District does not have facilities
to provide sewer and water services; that a letter from the
President of said District which states the District is "very
willing to support and cooperate with the City of Meridian and
Terteling Trust #7 to accomplish and complete this request"; that
Section 50-224 upon annexation by a City of land contained in
another taxing district which provides the same or similar
services, the land is relieved of taxes or assessments in that
taxing district; however, that City water and sewer does not
presently extend south of I-84 and is therefore not presently
available to the parcel; that if Applicant desires City water and
sewer services, it would be its responsibility to extend those
services to the parcel.
14. That the Central District Health Department (CDHD)
submitted a two Review Sheets regarding this Application; the
first one dated 9-25-85 indicates that CDHD could approve the
request with a central water system or an individual water
system; that the second review sheet dated 10-11-85 indicates
that the ground water is too high to allow sewerage to be
provided by a convential subsuzface septic system but that an
alternative sewerage system could be used; that an alternative
system would have to be designed by an engineer or qualified
person and must comply with all applicable design criteria; that
the alternative system must be reviewed and approved by CDHD
prior to issuance of a sewage permit.
15. That the Ordinances of the City of Meridian require
that once a parcel of property in the City comes within 300 feet
of City water and sewer it must be connected to City water and
qM BROSE,
FITZGERALD
B CROOKSiON
ABOmeys m0
Counwbn
P.O. BOZ I2]
Me~W Wf, lEHlo
8~Z
THp1aM B!!-IM7
sewer.
16. That the Ada County Highway District (ACHD) submitted
recommendations pertaining to ACHD requirements; that said
comments and recommendations are incorporated herein by this
reference as if set forth in full hereat.
17. That the purposes in the proposed zone of "C-G) General
Retail and Service Commercial is to "provide for commercial uses
which are customarily operated entirely or almost entirely within
a building; to provide for a review of the impact of proposed
Commercial Uses which are auto and service oriented and are
located in close proximity to major highway or arteriel streets;
to fulfill the need for travel-related services as well as retail
sales for the transient and permanent motoring public," 11-2-408
8, Meridian Zoning Ordinance. That section also requires that
property zoned C-G he connected to Municipal Water and Sewer and
not constitute Strip Commercial Development.
18. That there was not testimony, oral or written objecting
to the Application.
CONCLUSIONS
AMBfiOSE,
FITZGERALD
6 CROOKSTON
Attomsys YW
Counbior~
MMOWt, IO,Ito
BJ!/2
1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local
Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have
been met including the mailing of notice to owners of property
within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the applicant's
property.
2. That the City has authority to annex land pursuant to
50-222, Idaho Code; that excerise of the City's annexation
authority is a Legislative function.
3. That the Planning and Zoning Commission has judged the
annexation and zoning application by the guidelines, standards,
_,.F r,
~... xy.
AMBROBE,
F172GERALD
6 CROOKBTON
Attorneys anE
Collneelore
P.O.BO>t~ZI
:. ~!'.il
criteria, and policies contained in Section 50-222, Title 67,
chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Meridian City Ordinances, Meridian
Comprehensive Plan, and the recozd submitted to it and things of
which it can take judicial notice.
4. That the Commission may take judicial notice of it own
and the City Council's proceedings, governmental statues,
ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing
within the City and State.
5. That all land within the proposed annexation is
contiguous to the present City limits of the City of Meridian,
and the annexation would not be a shoestring annexation.
6. That the annexation application has been initiated by
the Applicants and the owner of the parcel and is not at the
request or initiation of the City of Meridian.
7. That the annexation is in compliance with the Meridian
Comprehensive Plan.
8. That the zoning of C-G is in compliance with the
Meridian Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance except for
the requirement contained in Section 11-2-408 8 which requires
that land zoned C-G be connected to municipal water and sewer;
that the Applicant would either be required to extend City sewer
and water to its land or request a variance from Section 11-2-408
8 so that the zoning and development would not be in violation of
the Zoning Ordinances.
9. That since the land is presently in the Meridian Sewer
ry
AMBROSE,
FITZGERALD
B CROOKSTON
Attom~yx YW
CounNbn
P.O. Box t27
MMMIM,MNo
8~
TPIp11MPBBB~161
and Water District but upon annexation the land would not be
subject to the District taxes if both the City and the District
provide the same services and yet at this time neither the
District nor the City actually provide any water or sewer
services, some agreement between the City, the Sewer and Water
District, and the Applicant needs to be made regarding who has
jurisdiction over sewer and water and who will provide the
service in the long term.
10. That at this juncture the Commission has no objection
to interim sewer and water facilities so long as the requirements
of the Central District Health Department approves of them.
11. That since annexation is a legislative function, the
City may place conditions on annexation or, where appropriate,
conditionally annex and zone a parcel of land.
12. That the comments of the Ada County Highway District
and the Central Health Department are reasonable and the
Applicant should be required to comply therewith.
13. That upon annexation and zoning, the land would be
subject to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and development
would have to comply therewith.
14. That the Applicant has made development representations
in its Application and in the testimony and evidence it has
submitted; that it is reasonable that Applicant be required to
honor those representations.
15. That the City has recently enacted and approved a Site
k
AMBROSE,
FIROERALD
d CROOKSTON
Anwnly.lna
Counwlpl
P.O. BOx 127
MMMIM,WNo
pN2
T111p11pN N6/N/
A-tAI~. .e~,: r-~ e
Planning Review provision as part of the Zoning Ordinance;
Section 11-2-410 C SZTE PLANNING REVIEW; that any development
should be subject to site planning review.
16. Therefore, based on the Application, the testimony and
evidence, these Findings and Conclusions, and the Ordinances of
the City of Meridian, it is ultimately concluded that Applicants
property should be annexed and zoned, provided a variance is
requested from Section 11-2-408 8 and that such is in the best
interest of the City; that the conditions of the annexation and
zoning should be those contained in the following Recommendation.
APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts
and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions.
ROLL CALL
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Chairman Spe
Cole
Shearer
Johnson
Alidjani
Morrow
ncer (Tie Breaker)
Voted
Voted~~
Voted V
Voted _ ~. J
Voted V
voted __ _
.F . a ' ,
' •I n ' • •
RECOMMENDATION
It is hereby recommended that Applicant's property be
annexed and zoned C-G, provided the City Council approves of a
variance from 11-2-408 8; that the Applicant be required to meet
the requirements of the Ada County Highway District and the
Central Health Department; that development be subject to Site
Planning Review; that a long term agreement on sewer and water be
encouraged between the Applicant, the City., and the Meridian
Sewer and Water District; and that the property be subject to the
Ordinances of the City of Meridian.
MOTION:
APPROVED:~_ DISAPPROVED:
AMBROSE,
FITZGERALD
i CROOKSTON
Attomsys YM
Counesbn
P.O.Ib~ /2T
MMOW1, IOY1o
KitNY
TeleplloM BBl4/Mt
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
SAMUEL LYTLE AND ROBERTA LYTLE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
1440 W. CHERRY LANE
MERIDIAN, IDAHO
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The above entitled matter having come on for public hearing
AMBROSE,
FIT2GERALO
6 CROOKSTON
Attomsys and
Counaebrs
P.O. Box ~7
MxMMn,Wda
83612
Wp1~drBMMBI
October 15, 1985, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m., the
Petitioner appearing in person, the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of Meridian having duly considered the
evidence and the matter makes the following Findings of Fact and
Conclusions:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That a notice of a public hearing on the Conditional
Use Permit was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to
the said public hearing scheduled for October 15, 1985, the first
publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing;
that the matter was duly considered at the October 15, 1985
hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express
comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were
made available to newspaper, radio and television stations;
.-y
2. That this property is located within the City of
Meridian and is owned by the applicant and is known by the
address of 1440 West Cherry Lane, Meridian, Idaho;
3. That the property is located in a residential
district, that requires a conditional use permit for the
operation of a home occupation which is what a beauty salon is
and which is the use the application requests;
4. That a proper notice has been given as required by law
and all approvals and procedures before the Planning and Zoning
Commission have been given and followed;
5. That no persons appeared at the hearing objecting to
the use of the property as a two operator beauty salon which is a
commerical use;
6. That the property had a prior conditional use permit
for a bookkeeping business;
7. That at the public hearing there was no public comment
except for the applicants';
8. That the Central District Health Department and City
Engineer submitted recommendations which recommendations are
incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full
hereat;
9. That a home occupation is allowed in a residential
district under a Conditinal Use Permit; that said use is a
commercial use.
AMeROSE, I CONCLUSIONS
FITZGERALD
B CROOKSTON
AttarnMx~no
Counssbre
P.O. Box ART
MMMMn, NWw
83!12
Tslplaru 8861M1
AMBROSE,
FITZGERALD
d CPOOKSTON
Attonroye h0
GOUnNlors
R.D. BOY /Z7
MMWMn, WYq
B]MY
isNgwns BBMM7
1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local
Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have
been met including the mailing of notice to owners of property
within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the applicant's
property and having obtained the consent of 758 of the owners of
property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the
applicant's property;
2. That the City of Meridian has authority to grant
conditional uses pursuant to 67-6512, Idaho Code, and, pursuant
to 11-2-418 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of
Meridian, Idaho;
3. That the City of Meridian has authority to place
conditions on a conditional use permit and the use of the
property pursuant to 67-6512, Idaho Code, and pursuant to
11-2-418(D) of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of
Meridian, Idaho;
4. That 11-2-418(C) of the Revised and Compiled
Ordinances of the City of Meridian sets forth the standards under
which the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council
shall review applications for Conditional Use Permits; that upon
a review of those requirements and a review of the facts
presented and the conditions of the area, the Planning and Zoning
Commission specifically concludes as follows:
a. The uses, in fact, constitute a conditional use and a
conditional use permit is required by ordinance.
b. The uses will be harmonious with and in accordance
with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance.
c. The use will be designed, constructed, operated, and
maintained to be harmonious in appearance with the
intended character of the general vicinity such being
designated for residential use.
d. That the uses will not be hazardous or disturbing to
existing or future neighboring uses.
e. The use will not create excessive additional
requirements at public cost for public facilities and
services and will not be detrimental to the economic
welfare of the community.
f. The uses will not involve uses, activities, processes,
materials, equipment and conditions of operation that
will be detrimental to any person, property or the
general welfare by reason of excessive production of
traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors.
g. That applicant shall be required to have parking for
the property which shall be so designed as not to
create an interference with traffic and parking on
surrounding public streets and which parking meets
the City Ordinances.
h. The development and uses will not result in the
AM BROSE,
FITZGERALD
B CROOKSTON
AKOfMyb NO
GounaNae
P.O. aoz all
MMUWI, IENo
63M2
destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic
feature of major importance.
~..,_
5. That the recommendations and requirements submitted by
the Central District Health Department and City Engineer are
reasonable and the Applicant shall be required to comply with
them and they shall be required;
6. That the Applicant shall be required to pay
appropriate rates for sewer, water, and trash and shall be
required to pay for and and all connection fees for water and
sewer necessitated by his uses;
7. That the permit once granted shall be personal to the
Applicants and shall not be transferrable to other individuals or
AMBROSE,
FIRGERALD
d CROOKSLON
Atlomlyl uW
COU11MI01!
P.O. BO. 111
Mar101Yi, M111o
87!11
TaMp11dN B!&1M/
property.
f41
APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
AM SROSE,
FITZGERALD
B CROOKSTON
AttomeystnE
CounaNOn
P.O. Sort ~Z7
MMMIN,bYro
BJMII
TtN~pApb SS6{Mt
~;y,..... ..~..
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts
and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions
ROLL CALL:
Commissioner Morrow Voted f!~
Commissioner Alidjani Voted,~Y..i _
Commissioner Johnson Voted~V, s
Commissioner Shearer Voted~,~_
Commissioner Cole Voted
Chairman Spencer (Tie Breaker) Voted _,_
DECISION AND RECOMMENDATION
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby
recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they
approve the Conditional Use Permit requested by the Applicant for
the property described in the application under the conditions
stated herein.
MOTION:
APPROVED: _~
DISAPPROVED: ~r_