1986 07-14• i
A G E N D A
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING
JULY 14, 1986
ITEM:
MINUTE~.OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD JUNE 9, 1986: (APPROVED)
1. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS ON ANNEXATION & ZONING
REQUEST BY C & O CONSTRUCTION: (APPROVED)
2. DISCUSSION ON AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING & DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE.
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONNING COMMISSION JULY 14, 1986
Regular Meeting of the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission called to
order by Chairman Bob Spencer at 7:30 p.m.:
Members Present: Walt Morrow, Moe Alidjani, Jim Johnason, Tom Cole:
Members Absent: Jim Shearer:
Others Present: Bob S4herry, Bill Nary, Lane Hamilton, John Hazen:
The Motion was made by Morrow and seconded by Alidjani to approve the
minutes of the previous meeting held June 9, 1986 as written:
Motion Carried: All Yea:
Item #1: Findings of Fact and Conclusions on Request for Annexation and
Zoning by C & O Construction:
Chairman Spencer, is there any questions or discussion by the Commission
on these Findings of Fact and Conclusions?
The Commission were advised that this request would have to come back
to the Commission for a Conditional Use Permit and Design Review before
the project could be built. The developers chose to proceed with this
application only for financial purposes to make sure they had preliminary
approval before they expended monies for architect fees and etc. The
applicant has also been advised that the Zoning & Development Ordinance
will have to be amended before final approval can be given.
The Motion was made by Moorow and seconded by Cole that the Meridian
Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves the Findings
of Fact and Conclusions as prepared on the Request for Annexation and
Zoning by C & 0 Construction:
Motion Carried: Cole, Yea: Johnson, Yea: Alidjani, Yea: Morrow, Yea:
The Motion was made by Morrow and seconded by Cole That it is hereby
recommended to the City Council that the property should be conditionally
annexed and zoned R-40 Residential which conditions are stated in the
Findings of Fact and Conclusions and those conditions should be invest-
igated and set forth by the City Council:
Motion Carried: All Yea:
Item #2: Discussion on Amendments to the Zoning & Development Ordianace:
Chairman Spencer, the Commission has received some items that either
need amended or clarified in the Zoning & Development. Ordinance. We
will start with Item 2-408-B-4 that only allows R-40 Zoning in the
Old Town Designated Area. There was discussion on this item and it
was the concensus of the Commission that this item needed amended
to allow R-40 Zoning in other areas:
MERIDIAN PLANNI, & ZONING •
JULY 14, 1986
PAGE # 2
Chairman Spencer, the next item is 2-409 which does not allow lesser
density than zoned in some instances: There was discussion on this
item and it was the consensus of the Commission that the necessary
changes be made to this section pertaining to residential:
Chairman Spencer, the next item is 2-410-A Maximium Lot Coverage and
the description of Lot Coverage as far as buildings go on page #14:
This item came up because someone was talking about building some
fairly large units and if the garages had to be included in the
lot coverage he would have to reduce the size of the units or not
have covered parking. There was discussion on this item: It was the
consensus of the Commission that this needed revised in some manner,
either with change in the description of lot coverage or a change in
the maximium amount of lot coverage.
Chairman Spencer, we now have the items suggested by the City Engineer
starting with the suggestion that we add a paragraph which requires
fencing or tiling of irrigation, laterals or canals. There was some
discussion on this item and it was the consensus of the Commission
that this item did not need to be added to the Zoning & Development
Ordinance but should be one of the requirements when approval of a
preliminary or final plat was requested by a developer.
The sencond suggestion is that our Ordinance needs to be amended to
conform with ACHD's most current specifications on Highway & Street
Types, Section 9-605-B-3a: It was the decision of the Commission that
the Ordinance should be amended to reflect this change:
The third suggestion was that Section 9-617-A-2 Fence Regulations be
amended to require a four foot width and depth blockout for water meter
and fire hydrants: There was discussion on this item and after consider-
ation of the Commission it was the consensus that this not be amended.
The Motion was made by Alidjani and seconded by Cole to have the City
Attorney draw legally the items that the Commission has decided need
amended and make a notice for a Public Hearing.
Motion Carried: All Yea:
Being no further business to come before the Commission the Motion was
made by Cole and seconded by Morrow to adjourn at 8:10 p.m.:
Motion Carried: All Yea:
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
APPROVED•
. SP CER, CHAIRMAN
+Uv
/ Ja k Ni ma , City Clerk
r pci: Ma~& Council, P&Z Members, Atty, Eng, Police, Fire, Mitich, Ward
~ St art, Valley News, Statesman, ACRD, ACC, ACZ, CDH, NIMD,Hallett
File: (2) Mail (2)
OFFICIALS
JACK NIEMANN, Clty Clen
A M KIEBERT,Tnewrar
BRUCED STUART, WeUrWOhs Suet.
WAYNE G. CROOKSTON. JR., Anorrroy
EARL WARD. Weete Weter SUFI
KENNY BOWERS. Fue CNlel
ROY PORTER. Police Cher
GARY $MITN, Clry Enplneer
JULY 14, 1986
HPB OF TREASC"RE VALLF.]' •
A Good Place to Live
CITY OF MERIDIAN
728 Meridian Street
MERIDIAN, IDAHO
83842
Phone 8881433
GRANT P. KINGSFORD
Mayor
PLANNING & ZONING MEMBERS:
COUNCILMEN
BILL BREWER
RONALOR TOLSMA
J. E BERT MYERS
ROBERT GIES~ER
BOB SPENCER
Cnaumen Zomnp 8 PlenNnp
ADDITIONAL ITEM THAT NEEDS DISCUSSED AND MAYBE AMENDED IN
THE ZONING & DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE.
2-409 DOES NOT ALLOW LESS DENSITY IN ALL CASES IN SOME
ZONES: (EXAMPLE) DUPLEX NOT ALLOWED IN R-15 ZONE:
JACK NIEMANN
ZONING ADMINSTRATOR
JULY 11, 1986
PLANNING & ZONING MEMBERS:
I HAVE TWO ITEMS THAT I FELL NEED CLARIFIED AND AMENDED IN
THE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE:
~~i~/ (1) 2-408-B-4 R-90 Zoning only allowed in the OLD TOWN DESIGNATION:
U/`;1J The City already has areas which are probably R-40 that are
not in this area even though they are zoned R-15:
Hope Arms Apartments, James Court & Washington Square:
(2) Lot Coverage as far as garages are concerned: See Page # 14
description and 2-410-A Maximum Lot Coveraae.
IF ANY OF THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY OTHER ITEMS, PLEASE
BRING UP AT THIS MEETING:
3;
I`~
.~. ~ G ~~
vN c~.
~~D ~ S /V o t ~ ~ I o ..J fsS
~ ~ ~ _ ~ 5 ~ p.Jc.._
~J
~(V
U~~j~
~~
"~ ~
• HUB OF TREASURE VALLF_~'
A Good Place to Live
OFFICIALS
JALK NIEM ANN,Chy Clerk
CITY
OF MERIDIAN
A. M. KIEBE RT, Tnlesuror
BRUCE D. STUART, Weter Worke Supt.
WAYNE G.CROOKSTON.JR.. AtitKney 728 Meridian $LTeeY
EARL WARD. Weete Weter Supt.
KEN NY BOWERS. Fire Chlet
MER.IDIAIV, IDAHO
ROY PORTER. Polio Cniet 83842
GARY $MITN, Llty En01^eer Phone 888-4433
GRANT P. KINGSFORD
Mayor
Memorandum - July 14, 1986
To: Meridian Planning & Zonino
From: Gary Smith - City Engineer
Re: Suggestions for Revisions to Meridian Zoning
and Development Ordinance
i
A. Development Ordinance -
COUNCILMEN
BILL BREWER
RONALD R. TOLSMA
J. E. BERT MYERS
ROBERT GIESLER
BOB SPENCER
Chalnnan 2oninp 8 Plannmp
.~ 1. Section 9-605: Add a sub-paragraph titled "Tiling or Fencing
of Irrigation, Laterals or Canals." Our previous City Ordinance
contained this provision and recently I have been asked about
this requirement by several concerned City residents. Attached
-~ is a copy of the requirement from our previous Ordinance.
C ~,~ ,Section 9-605, (B) - 3a - "Highway F• Street Types." This item
should he revised to conform with ACHD's most current specifications.
The listino should read:
Expressway or Freeway 160-260 feet
Major Arterial 80 feet
Minor Arterial 66 feet
Urban Collector 60 feet
Urban Residential 50 feet
Non-Continuous Residential 40-46 feet
3. Section 9-617 A2
water department
'~ the water meters
and depth dimens
attached.)
(Dwg.) "Fence Regulation." To give our
adequate area in which to maintain and operate
and hydrants I would like to show a 4' widths
ion of the fence blockout (copy of drawing
Respe fully Submitted,
Gary D, mith, P.E.
City Engineer
u
9 -607
9-607
• •
21 d. Dead-end alleys shall be avoided where possible, but if unavoidable shall be
provided with adequate turn-around facilities at the dead-end as determined by
~- -Sbe-kY'~and Council.
e. Crosswalk easements for pedestrians shall be provided where deemed
essential to provide circulation or access to schools, playgrounds, shopping
areas, transportation or any other community facilities. The said crosswalk
easements shall have a minimum width of six feet 16'1 and shall be improved
with a concrete walk over the full width of the easement with proper fencing on
each side of the easement.
Blocks:
a. The length, width and shape of blocks shall be determined with due regard
to adequate building sites suitable to the special needs of the type of use
contemplated; the zoning requirements as to lot size and dimensions; the need
for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic; and the
limitations and opportunities of topography.
b. Block lengths shall not exceed one thousand feet (1,000'1.
4. Lots:
a. All lots shown on the subdivision plat must conform to the minimum
requirements of the Zoning Code. (Chapter 4, Section 2-001271
b. Side lines of lots shall be approximately at right angles or radial to the street
lines unless a variation will give a better street and lot plan. All corner lots shall
have a minimum radius of twenty feet (20'1 on the property line.
c. Double frontage lots shall be prohibited except where unusual topography
or other conditions make it impossible to meet this requirement.
d. All remnants of bts below minimum size left over after the subdividing of a
larger tract must be added to adjacent lots rather than allowed to remain as
L
L-
L
5. Tilin or Fencin of Irri ation Ditciie Lat rats or Canals. All irrigation ditches,
latera s or Cana s, exc usrve o natura waterways, m ersecting, crossing or
lying adjacent and contiguous to an area being subdivided shall be covered, or
if not feasible, then fenced with an eleven 111) gauge, two inch (2"1 mesh chain
fink fence or other construction equivalent in ability to deter access to said
ditch, lateral or canal, at least six feet 16'1 in height and securely fastened at its
base at all places where any part of said lands or areas being rsubdivided touch
either or both sides of said ditch, lateral or canal. The City may waive the
requirement for covering or fencing such ditch, lateral or canal if it finds that
the public purpose requiring such will not be served in the individual case. Any
covering or fencing program involving the distribution system of any irrigation
district shall have the prior approval of the affected district.
No subdivision plat shall be approved where the subdivision is arbitrarily or
artifically laid out to avoid being adjacent to any irrigation ditch, lateral or canal
to which it would otherwise be naturally adjacent or which it would otherwise
naturally include. (Ord. 351, 9-4-791
665;1179
c..
- 5-6D5
E :TREE TS
1. Dedication -Within a proposed subdivision, art~el and collec-
tor streets es shown on the Comprehensive Plan shall be dedicated
to the public in all cases; in general, all other streets shall
also be dedicated to public use.
2. Location - Street and road location shall conform to the locatior.
requirements of ACRD or successor agency.
3. Street and Road Specifications -
a. Street Right-of-way Widths - Shall comply with the require-
ments of ACHD or any successor agency. street end road
right-of-way widths shall conform to the adopted major
street plan or comprehensive development plan and the
rules of the State Department of Highways and the Highway
District or Department having jurisdiction. Minimum
right-of-way standards are as follows:
vat and Street Types Widths
Expressway or Freeway .....................166-260 feet
Major Arterial ...........................••---120 feet
Minor Arterial ...........................•---- 8D feet
Collector Street .............................. 60 feet
Minor Street .................................. 50 feet
tion-Continuous Residential Street ............. 40 feet
b. Street a not exceed ten (1D)
percent on either minor or collector streets, and six (6)
percent for arterial streets. The minimum grade of alt
streets shall be D.3 percent.
c. street Alignment -Street alignment shall be a_ follows:
1) Horizontal Alignment - when street lines deflect from
each other by more than ten (10) degrees in alignment,
the centerlines shall be connected by a curve having
a minimur, radius of five hundred (500) feet for
arterial streets, three hundred (300) feet for collec-
tor streets. Between reverse curves or, collector and
arterial streets, there shall be a minimum tangent
distance of two hundred (200) feet; and
2) Vertical Alignment - Minimum stopping sight distances
shall be two hundred (20D) feet for minor streets and
designed in accordance with design speed for collector
and arterial streets.
4. Street Names - The naming of streets shall conform to the
following:
-16-
1
Fr;>nce i;t~g~t.ion
INc•~6[ L
-nip a
~roperty Lin
i
CITY OF MERIDIAN
28 Merldlan Street
6' Solid or Open Fence
behind Set Back
Property
Line
I,
/ir
i iJ~}-~
Property
line-~
\ ~
~!
3' Solid Fence
or 4' Open Chain
Link Type Fence
In Front of Setback
Fence Re~uiaiion
j CORNER LOT
.~
4
Property Line
+~ Street
~°
~~ ~ ~
Leave Open Access
to Water Meters
and Fire Hydrant
6' Wood, Solid
or Open Fence
z~'
3' Wood or Solid Fence
nor 4' Open Fence
site Triar~~i
'X'
i
4_ jig ~
~ ~
0 3' Wood or Solid Fenc
~ ur 4' Open Fence
eti~
Site
3` Ghain Link
or Open Fence
-46-
Leave Open Acces3
to WatetF Meters
and Fire Hydrant
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
C & O CONSTRUCTION ANNEXATION AND ZONING
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The above entitled annexation and zoning application having
come on for consideration on June 9, 1986, at approximately 7:30
o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 728
Meridian Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the Commission having heard
and taken oral and written testimony and the applicant appearing
and having duly considered the matter, the Planning and Zoning
Commission makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That notice of the public hearing on the annexation and
zoning use was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to
the said public hearing scheduled for June 9, 1986, the first
publication of which was 15 days prior to said hearing; that the
matter was duly considered at the June 9, 1986 hearing; that
copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio and
television stations.
2. That the property included in the Application for
Annexation and Zoning is described in the application, and by
this reference is incorporated herein; that the property is
~MBROSE,
FITZGEMLD
dCROOKSTON
~HOmeye Intl
GJOnNIOn
P.O. BO.121
MwWNn,WNo
!2112
TWp~OM B!&IM1
FMBROSE,
FITZGER~LD
E CROONSTON
Attornay~nM
CounNlore
P.O. Box 12]
MM0W,1ONo
BS612
TN~gwM SBB1M1
approximately 4 acres in size; it is north of Cherry Plaza Mall;
it has no direct access to Meridian Road or to Fairview Avenue;
access is proposed by means of an easement along the north
boundary of the Cherry Plaza property and an extension of "2 1/2"
Street; that the easement is approximately 30 feet in width; that
applicant is negotiating with other property owners for
additional access.
3. The property is presently zoned by the county
agriculturally and the present use is the same.
4. That the property to the South is Cherry Plaza shopping
mall, a vacant lot and some commercial property; the property to
the east is a mobile home park of high density; the property to
the north is generally in agricultural use; the property to the
west is a residence and vacant ground previously used
agriculturally.
5. That the property is adjacent and abutting to the
present City limits.
6. Kenneth and Lois Cooper are the owners of the property
and they have consented to the Application.
7. That the property included in the annexation and zoning
application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian.
8. That the entire parcel of ground is included within the
Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service
Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan; that
the property is in the North Curve Neighborhood as designated on
the Policy Diagram contained in the Comprehensive Plan and is not
included in Old Town.
9. That the Application for annexation requests that the
parcel be annexed and zoned (R-40) Residential; that there is no
present use of the property other than vacant ground; that the
Applicant indicated that the intended development of the property
was a high density residential planned unit development for
retired citizens.
10. That the Applicant did not submit a request for a
conditional use for a planned unit development.
11. That if the land were annexed at this time the City
would be obligated to provide, at a minimum, police and fire
protection services.
12. That the City has in the recent past conditionally
annexed and zoned property conditioned upon final platting and
commencement of construction of sewer and water and other
reasonable conditions.
13. That there was no testimony from the public objecting
to the Application.
14. That the property can be serviced with City water and
sewer.
15. That the fire department submitted input which
indicated that two adequate fire accesses should be provided and
that adequate fire hydrants should be placed on the property;
there was also concern about fire safety in the event development
nrnBRDBE,
FITZGERRLD
6 CROOKSTON
Rttom~ys ~nE
COU11Mb11
V.O. Boa /2]
MsrMW~ IOtlw
B9B12
Wp11pN MB~MI
AMBROSE,
F1T2GERALD
B CROOKSTON
Atiornaya Md
Counaebrs
P.O. Boz /27
MxWMn, ICYIo
T~Np~on~ BB8dM1
of more than two stories was to be considered.
16. Ada County Highway District and the Department of
Health submitted comments and such are incorporated herein as if
set forth in full.
CONCLUSIONS
1. That the City has authority to annex land pursuant to
50-222, Idaho Code; that excerise of the City's annexation
authority is a Legislative function.
2. That the Planning and Zoning Commission has judged this
annexation and zoning application by the guidelines, standards,
criteria, and policies contained in Section 50-222, Title 67,
Chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Meridian City Ordinances, Meridian
Comprehensive Plan as amended February 19, 1985, and the record
submitted to it and things of which it can take judicial notice.
3. That all notice and hearing requirements set forth in
Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, and the Ordinances, of the City
of Meridian have been complied with.
4. That the Commission may take judicial notice of
government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions
existing within the City and State.
5. That the land within the proposed annexation is
contiguous to the present City limits of the City of Meridian,
and the annexation would not be a shoestring annexation.
6. That the annexation application has been initiated by
AMBROSE,
FIRGERALD
B CROOKSTON
Attorneys MO
Counwbn
P.O. Boz IY7
MxIE1M, IMllo
B9l17
TsMplgn~ N6/M1
the Petitioner, with consent of the owners, and the annexation is
not upon the initiation of the City of Meridian.
7. That since the annexation and zoning of land is a
legislative function the City has authority to place conditions
upon the annexation of land.
8. That the following provisions of the Meridian
Comprehensive Plan are noted in relation to this Application:
a. p.8 GOALS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
GOAL 4: To provide housing opportunities for all
economic groups within the community.
b. p.12 POPULATION GROWTH--POLICIES
3: Unimproved or unrealized land within
Meridian City limits and Urban Service
Planning Area should be utilized in order
to maximize public investments, curtail
urban sprawl and protect existing
agricultural lands from unnecessary
infringement.
c. p.23 HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
1: Encourage the overall balance of public
and private proposals regarding
residiential development and includes a
variety of densities, housing types and
housing opportunities for all segments of
the planning area popluation.
p.25 2. The Comprehensive Plan provides and
encourages the implementation of Planned
Development (PD) techniques:
(1.> when land has been, or will be, dedicated
for the development of essential public
services or facilities such as school
sites, fire stations, libraries, land for
park, recreation open space, and
historical, architectural or archaeological
sites.
(2.) When environmentally sensitive lands
(creeks, wetlands, wooded areas) have been
preserved in their natural state, and
design and development considerations have
been made to protect such lands from
geological, topographical and other natural
or man-made hazards as part of the overall
residential development project.
(3.) When development projects preserve and
utilize natural physical features as part
of their overall design concept and make
use of such techniques as cluster
AMeROSE,
FIRGERALD
I CROOKSiON
ANOrnaya YM
CwRN1IX~
v.o. eo: u~
nl.nalr~, wlw
sx~x
rrnnoR. eaawei
.._... .. .,zs..
development and density transfers, in order
to conserve existing natural features which
are both aesthetically pleasing and
functional.
(4.) When developments promote orderly,
well-planned and aesthetically designed
projects which are consistent with the
goals, objectives and policies of the
Meridian Comprehensive Plan.
AMBROSE,
FITZGEMLD
BCROONSTON
An«~w.1na
CqunNlMt
P.O. BOZ IR7
BNMEI~n,IA~M
69812
T~MPIwM 888M81
(5.) When development utilizes and is consistent
with public service facility-management
plans for the Urban Service Planning Area.
p.26 3. HOUSING POLICIES
(1.) The City of Meridian intends to provide for
a wide diversity of housing types
(single-family, mobile homes and
multi-family arrangements) and choices
between ownership and rental dwelling units
for all income groups in a variety of
locations suitable for residential
development.
(4.) The development of housing for all income
groups close to employment and shopping
AM BROSE,
FIROERALD
S CROONSTON
Attormya enE
CouneNps
P.O. Box X27
MarMNn, IdYw
&9M2
•~4p~on~lBBNl1
centers should be encouraged.
p.27 (14.) Design and performance standards should be
applied to infilling development in order
to reduce adverse impacts upon existing
adjacent development.
(18.) As Planned Development methods and
standards are considered by the City of
Meridian, variations pertaining to Planned
Development (PD)---maximum density,
dimensional standards and other
requirements---shall not exceed 258 of the
existing requirements, and shall be
recommended when one or more of the Planned
Development (PD) design and development
objections are met.
(19.) High density development, where possible,
should be located near open space corridors
or other permanent major open space and
park facilities and near major access
thoroughfares.
(20.) Density transfers should be encouraged in
exchange for school sites, open space
dedications, or for access easements to
linear open space corridors, which contain
bicycle and pedestrian pathway systems.
AMSROSE,
FITZGERALD
d CROOKSTON
ABOmlyx vW
Ca+nxron
P.O. Box 127
MMtlI1n, MMo
B]B12
TNpIwMBSBIMI
p.29 TRANSPORTATION
Principal Arterials:
Cherry Lane/Fairview
Minor Arterials:
Meridian Road/North of Fairview
9. That the following provisions of the Zoning Ordiance of
the City of Meridian are noted:
a.) 11-2-408 B 4. (R-40) High Density Residential
District: the purpose of the (R-40) District is
to permit the establishment of high density
residential uses at a density not exceeding forty
(40) dwelling units per acre. This District is to
be located exclusively within the Mixed Use
Review Area designated as OLD TOWN in the
Comprehensive Plan.
b.) 11-2-409 A Residential Schedule of Use
Control: indicates a planned unit
development requires a conditional use in the
R-40 District.
10. That the development of annexed land must meet and
comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in
particular Section 11-9-616 which pertains to development time
schedules and requirements; that the applicant should be required
to connect to Meridian water and sewer lines and extend such to
the development at its own cost; that the property will be
RMBBDSE,
FITZGERALD
B CROOKSTON
•ttwlleysaM
Cwnwbn
P.O. Boz Ill
MwrMNn, WWo
SMI2
TN~ggn~BB&IMl
N o »
subject to Site Planning Review.
11. That proper and adequate access to the property is of
great concern to the Commission; that access will have to be
improved to allow the proposed development.
12. That it is concluded that the annexation would be in
the best interests of the City of Meridian if the land was going
to be immediately developed.
13. That due to Sections 11-2-408 and 11-2-409 above stated
it is concluded that the Commission can only conditionally
recommend the annexation and zoning of the property; that these
conditions are that a zoning amendment be obtained allowing R-40
classification outside of OLD TOWN and that a conditional use be
granted allowing a planned unit development.
14. It is pointed out to the Applicant that while
recommendation is being made for conditional annexation and
zoning, and the Commission approves of the concept of the planned
unit development, the Commission reserves the right and ability
to impose conditions and restrictions on Application for
conditional use permit for the planned unit development and upon
site planning review. It is noted at this juncture that the
access does not appear to meet the requirements for a planned
unit development nor does the land and project appear to meet
implementation of planned development techniques set forth in
Conclusion 8. and does not meet some of the housing policies in
Conclusion 9.
~MBROSE,
fITZGERgLD
d CROOKSTON
AtlGMpy! NO
Counssbn
P.O. Sox l77
MNWW, IOYa
S7l12
T~IpNpN N6M6/
15. Therefore, based on the Application, the testimony and
evidence, these Findings and Conclusions, and the Ordinances of
the City of Meridian, it is ultimately concluded that Applicant's
property should be conditionally annexed and zoned as requested;
that the conditions should be those stated above and upon
issuance of final platting or issuance of a building permit and
other conditions to be explored at the City Council level; that
such annexation would be orderly development and reasonable if
the conditions are met.
APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts
and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions.
ROLL CALL
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Chairman Spe
Cole
Shearer
Johnson
Alidjani
Morrow
ncer (Tie Breaker)
Voted ~/e j
Voted
Voted
Voted ~~1__
voted ~/~,,,~
Voted-T~
RECOMMENDATION
It is hereby recommended to the City Council that the
property should be conditionally annexed and zoned R-40
Residential which conditions are stated hereinabove and those
investigated and set forth by the City Council.
MOTION:
APPROVED:~~
AMBROSE,
FITZGERALD
6 CROONSTON
AROm~yx YW
Counwla~
P.O. Box 17l
MMEIUy IG~o
83M2
Tslaplwn~ MNM1
e.. a i'Y E _ ~ '.
DISAPPROVED: