1986 12-08
A G E N D A
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING
DECEMBER 8, 1986
ITEM:
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER g , 1986: (APPROVED)
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD OCTOBER 14, 1986: (APPROVED)
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 27, 1986:
1: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY CAL GAS
CORPORATION: (RECOL+IMENDED APPROVAL)
2. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY LOREN ROSS
AND GREENLEAF FRIENDS ACADEMY: (RECOMMENDED APPROVAL)
3: Discussion for provision in Zoning & Development Ordinance on
ditch coverings:
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING DECEMBER 8, 1986
Regular Meeting of the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission called
to order by Acting Chaiiman Walt Morrow at 7:30 p.m.:
Members Present: Moe Alidjani, Jim Johnson, Jim Shearer, Tom Cole:
Members Absent: Bob Spencer:
Others Present: Wayne Crookston, Steve Wherry, Jack Garrett, Rich
Allison, Dick Deardon:
The Motion was made by Alidjani and seconded by Shearer to approve
the Minutes of the previous Meeting held September 8, 1986 as written:
Motion Carried: All Yea:
The Motion was made by Alidjani and seconded by Cole to approve the
Minutes of the Meeting held October 14, 1986 as written:
Motion Carried: All Yea:
The Motion was made by Johnson and seconded by Shearer to approve the
Minutes of the previous Meeting held October 27, 1986 as written:
Motion Carried: All Yea:
Item #1: Public Hearing: Request for Conditional Use Permit by Cal
Gas Corporation:
Chairman Morrow, is there anyone present to come forward and advise
the Commission about your project?
Mr. Dick Deardon was in the audience and advised he would speak on
behalf of Cal Gas Corporation. Mr. Deardon was sworn by Attorney
Crookston.
Deardon, what we are proposing to do is on the corner of 3rd and
Bower Street is install two 30,000 gallon propane tanks, these will
be used to store propane, load trucks out and unload rail cars.
Everything that will be installed will meet all standards and all
the different codes that are required for this type of operation.
There should be no problem from a safety standpoint and there should
not be any traffic problem there as there will probably only be maybe
four trucks a day in and out here. These will be delivery trucks.
Acting Chairman Morrow, are there any questions of the Commission?
Johnson, I do not see the signature of the property owners in my
material, did they get the necessary signatures?
City Clerk, I must have neglected to include these in your package,
they had seven out of the nine adjacent owners.
MERIDIAN P ~ •
DECEMBER 8, 86
PAGE # 2
Chairman Morrow, if there is no other questions of the Commission, the
Public Hearing will now be opened. Is there anyone in the audience who
wishes to testify on the request? There was no response. The Public
Hearing was closed. Commission Members you have preliminary Findings
of Fact & Conclusions, what is your decision?
The Motion was made by Cole and seconded by Shearer that the Dleridian
Planning & Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves the Findings
of Fact and Conclusions as prepared by the City Attorney.
Motion Carried: Alidjani, Yea: Johnson,Yea: Shearer, Yea: Cole, Yea:
Morrow, Yea:
The Motion was made by Shearer and seconded by Cole that the Meridian
Planning & Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of
the City of Meridian that they approve the Conditional Use Permit
requested by the Applicant for the property described in the application
with the conditions set forth in the Findings of fact & Conclusions of
Law and that the property be required to meet the water and sewer requir-
ements and the fire and life safety codes.
Motion Carried: All Yea:
Item #2: Public hearing: Request for Conditional Use Permit by Ross
and Greenleaf Friends Academy:
Chairman Morrow, is there someone present to represent this request?
Mr. Rich Allison, 1040 East Pine, Mr. Allison was sworn by Attorney
Crookston.
Allison, our proposal is to move the Greenleaf Friends Academy Day Care
Center from their present location on Pine Street to the Ross Furniture
Building located on Fairview Ave. The propsal at the present time is to
use half of the building for a day care center and an elementary school.
We have evaluated the site from the standpoint of the comments received
and would certainly be willing to meet the requirements. One item that
might be of interest as far as safety would be the dropoff and pickup
of the children, this would be in front of the building and then inside
the building they would have a gate which would keep any of the children
from running out into the front of the building at any time. The play-
ground for the children would be directly behind the building and fenced.
Chairman Morrow are there any questions of the Commission Members?
Alidjani, due to a conflict of interest, I would like to abstain from
any comments or action on this application.
Johnson, I understand the Academy is going to lease the East half of
the building, there would be adquate parking for this facility but if
the other half was to be rented to some other type of operation would
there continue to be adquate parking.
Allison, there are currently eighteen parking place in front of the
building, the owner is planning on tearing down the old house between
this building and the building occupied by Cal's Service parts as well
as removing the bath house and trailers at the side of the building for
MERIDIAN P
DECEMBER 8, 86
PAGE # 3
u
additional parking. This additonal parking would probably not be
completed until the balance of the building was rented.
Shearer, are you aware and do you have any problems with the comments
of the City Engineer and the Fire Department?
Allison, we are and the owner is well aware of the requirements.
Cole, what is the maximum number of children you are looking at here,
and how does that compare with what is currently enrolled? Is there
going to be an increase here?
Allison, there is presently 54 students and they have a waiting list
for day care children and they do propose to expand into the lower
elementary grades. It requires 35 square foot per child I believe
so they would be limited in that regard.
Cole, one other question I have is in regard to the playground, I know
when the children go out to play they get a little loud and the trailer
park there is an adult only park, do you think this is going to create
a problem? Will they be calling the City complaining?
Allison, they would probably call the landlord as he is the same one
who owns the building in question. We have addressed this and he would
probably vacate a couple of spaces if necessary.
Chairman Morrow, are there any othere questions of the Commission?
There were none. The Public Hearing was opened. There was no one present
who wished to testify on this request. The Public Hearing was closed.
Anything further from the Commission? There was no response.
Attorney Crookston, the Findings of Fact and Conclusions that were
prepared were preliminary and the comments of the Fire Department &
the City Engineer should be incorporated in to the Findings.
The Motion was made by Johnson and seconded by Cole that the Meridian
Planning & Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves the Findings
of Facts and Conclusions with the inclusions of the comments of the
Fire Department, the City Engineer and the Sewer Department.
Motion Carried: Alidjani, Abstain: Johnson, Yea: Shearer, Yea: Cole,
Yea: Morrow, Yea:
The Motion was made by Johnson and seconded by Cole that the Meridian
Planning & Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of
the City of Meridian that they approve the Conditional Use Permit
requested by the Applicant for the property described in the application
with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions
of Law and that the property be required to meet the water and sewer
reauirements and the fire and life safety codes.
Motion Carried: Four Yea: One Abstention:
MERIDIAN PLA~iNG & ZONING
DECEMBER E, ~$6
PAGE # 4
•
A Letter received from the Development Services I'epartment of Ada
County dated October 29, 1986 where they planned to amend Title 8
of the Ada County Code was reviewed and the Members had no comments
or objections to this amendr:~ent. (Letter on FileD
Two items that need possible amendment in the Zoning & Devel~?pment
Ordinance were discussed, one having to do with ditches in a Resident-
ial Subdivision and the other in the bulk & coverage section on R-8
Zoning. It was the consensus of the Commission that these along with
other items be discussed at a later date.
Being no other business to come before the Commission the Motion was
made by Cole and seconded by Alidjani to adjourn at 7:55 p.m.:
Motion Carried: All Yea:
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
ATTEST:
(~
`~}«~ !a ~"/~!n~«`
~Jagk Nient~, City Clerk:
~ i
pc: Mayor & Council
P & Z Members
Atty, Eng, Fire,
Police, Ward, Stuart,
Mitich, Hallett, Valley News
Statesman, ACC,ACHD,
NIMD, CDH, ACZ
APPROVED:
/,.,~~~-~A~ ~ljCl`7L-'CC~C~Lr'r( Y`1c .. 1-)7ti!1.~.
~T MORROW, ACTING CHAI AN
Mail: (2)
File: (2)
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RALPH ROSS AND GREENLEAF FRIENDS ACADEMY
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
403 E. FAIRVIEW AVENUE
MERIDIAN, IDAHO
PRELIMINARY
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The above entitled matter having come on for public hearing
AMBROSE,
FIROERALD
6 CROOKSTON
Anansys YW
CounWan
P.O. BoK 127
Msrl0lan, IEYw
67!12
TWpans Bl6/N1
December 8, 1966, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m., the
Petitioner appearing in person, the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of Meridian having duly considered the
evidence and the matter makes the following Findings of Fact and
Conclusions:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That a notice of a public hearing on the Conditional
Use Permit was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to
the said public hearing scheduled for December 8, 1986, the first
publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing;
that the matter was duly considered at the December 8, 1986
hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express
comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were
made available to newspaper, radio and television stations;
2. That this property is located within the City of
Meridian and is owned by the Applicant Ralph Ross, and is
II • •
described in the application which description is incorporated
herein; the other Applicant is Greenleaf Friends Academy who are
the proposed Lessees of the property;
3. That the property is zoned General Retail and Service
Commerical tC-G), which requires a conditional use permit for the
operation of a private school which is the use the application
requests; that such use requires a conditional use permit in any
zone where allowed.
4. That the C-G district is described in the Zoning
Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 8 as follows:
(C-G) GENERAL RETAIL AND SERVICE COMMERCIAL: The purpose of
the (C-G) District is to provide for commercial uses which
are customarily operated entirely or almost entirely within
a building; to provide fora review of the impact of pro-
prosed commercial uses which are auto and service oriented
and are located in close proximity to major highway or
arterial streets; to fulfill the need of travel-related
services as well as retail sales for the transient and
permanent motoring public. All such districts shall be
connected to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the
City of Meridian, and shall not constitute strip commercial
development and encourage clustering of commercial develop-
ment.
5. That the private school use proposed by Applicants is
an allowed conditional use in the C-G district.
6. That the property to the west is developed
•MSROSE,
FITZOER~LD
dCROOKSTON
•ROmays MM
CoYnsNOrs
P.O. Box ~T
MMONn, IONO
lJS~II
ToNgMn~M16/M1
commercially; the property to the east is used residentially and
commercially; the property to the south is used residentially as
a mobile home park; the property to the north is Fairview Avenue
and across Fairview the property is used commercially.
u • •
AMBROSE,
FIT20EML0
dCROOKSTON
Attanwys nE
Counwbn
R.o. BoA ur
MMCIYi, bNo
89MY
7. That a proper notice has been given as required by law
and all procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission have
been given and followed;
8. That the buuilding on the property is presently vacant
but has been used in the past as a furniture store;
9. That the Applicant has submitted petitions signed by
at least 758 of the people owning property within 300 feet of the
property indicating their approval of the use of the property as
requested by Applicants.
CONCLUSIONS
1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local
Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have
been met including the mailing of notice to owners of property
within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the applicant's
property and having obtained the consent of 758 of the owners of
property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the
applicant's property;
2. That the City of Meridian has authority to grant
conditional uses pursuant to 67-6512, Idaho Code, and, pursuant
to 11-2-418 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of
Meridian, Idaho;
3. That the City of Meridian has authority to place
conditions on a conditional use permit and the use of the
property pursuant to 67-65.12, Idaho Code, and pursuant to
11-2-418(D) of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of
Meridian, Idaho;
4. That 11-2-418(C) of the Revised and Compiled
Ordinances of the City of Meridian sets forth the standards under
which the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council
shall rev iew applications for Conditional Use Permits; that upon
a review of those requirements and a review of the facts
presented and the conditions of the area, the Planning and Zoning
Commission specifically concludes as follows:
a. The use, would in fact, constitute a conditional use
and a conditional use permit would be required by
ordinance.
b. The use would be harmonious with and in accordance
with the Comprehensive Plan but the Zoning Ordinance
requires a conditional use permit to allow the use.
c. The use apparently would be designed and constructed,
to be harmonious in appearance with the intended
character of the general vicinity.
d. That the use would not be hazardous nor should it be
disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses.
e. The property has sewer and water service available.
f. The use would not create excessive additional
requirements at public cost for public facilities and
services and the use would not be detrimental to the
economic welfare of the community.
AMBROSE, g. The use would not involve a use, activity, process,
F1T2GERALD
d CROOKSTON
Attomeye Ano
Coonsebn
P.O. Boa R7
YNrMMn, l0ela
87MII
Telep~olr BB6rM1
h~l'
~:~'.
material, equipment or conditions of operation that
would be detrimental to person, property or the
general welfare by reason of excessive production of
AMBROSE,
FITZGERAIA
6 CROOKSTON
Auomsya ~nE
CounMlan
P.O. Boa 1Y7
MsrI01n, MNo
B7NY
TN~WvN NB{16/
traffic or noise.
h. There is sufficient parking for the property and the
proposed use.
i. The development and uses will not result in the
destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic
feature of major importance.
5. That the location on Fairview Avenue is a very high
traffic area; that access to Fairview from the school use and
property must be controlled; that the f enced play-ground area
shall ha ve no open access and access must be obtained through the
school; such access restriction appears to be set forth on the
plans su bmitted.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The Motion was made by Johnson and seconded by Cole that the Meridian
Planning 6 Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves the Findings
of Facts and Conclusions with the inclusions of the comments of the
Fire Department, the City Engineer and the Sewer Department.
~~ ROLL CALL:
Commissioner Morrow
Commissioner Alidjani
Commissioner Johnson
Commissioner Shearer
Commissioner Cole
Voted ~Cfl
voted At?S7l~-j~2
Voted ~jP~-
Voted ~j P~}
Voted y tUF}
Chairman Spencer (Tie Breaker) Voted
DECISION AND RECOMMRDiDATION
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby
recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they
approve the Conditional Use Permit requested by the Applicant for
the property described in the application with the conditions set
forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and that the
property be required to meet the water and sewer requirement and
the fire and life safety codes.
MOTION:
AMBROSE,
FIRGERALD
d CROOKSTON
AttormYe eIM
CounMbn
P.O. BOx IR7
Merblen, lAMlo
B~!/L
TsleWtone BB&M!1
APPROVED:
I gB~l~i~
DISAPPROVED:
.~. <x7„r.. ,,.
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
CAL-GAS CORPORATION
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
LOTS 1 THROUGH 7, BLOCK 1, BOWEN'S RAILROAD ADDITION
MERIDIAN, IDAHO
PRELIMINARY
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The above entitled matter having come on for public hearing
~MBROSE,
F1720ERALD
6 CROOKSTON
~t1onMVSaM
Counxlon
P.O. Box ~Y!
Malol~n, IoNo
B7MII
TN~PNOn~BB6~Mt
December 8, 1986, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m., the
Petitioner appearing in person, the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of Meridian having duly considered the
evidence and the matter makes the following Findings of Fact and
Conclusions:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That a notice of a public hearing on the Conditional
Use Permit was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to
the said public hearing scheduled for December 8, 1986, the first
publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing;
that the matter was duly considered at the December 8, 1986
hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express
comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were
made available to newspaper, radio and tel.c>~,°',sion ~~tations;
2. That this property is located within the City of
Meridian and is described in the application which description is
yl` x:wa`._..
II • •
incorporated herein;
3. That the property is zoned Industrial (I-L), which
requires a conditional use permit for the operation of storage of
flammable liquids or gases which is the use the application
requests;
4. That the I-L district is described in the Zoning
Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 11 as follows:
(Z-L) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL: The purpose of the (I-L) Light
Industrial District is to provide for light industrial
development and opportunities for employment of Meridian
citizens and area residents and reduce the need to commute
to neighboring cities; to encourage the development of
manufacturing and wholesale establishments which are clean,
quiet and free of hazardous or objectionable elements, such
as noise, odor, dust, smoke or glare and that are operated
entirely or almost entirely within enclosed structures; to
delineate areas best suited for industrial development
because of location, topography, existing facilities and
relationship to other land uses. This district must also be
in such proximity to insure connection to the Municipal
Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian. Uses
incompatible with light industry are not permitted, and
strip development is prohibited.
5. That the storage of flammable liquids or gases use
proposed by Applicants is an allowed conditional use in the I-L
district.
6. That the property to the west is a lumber business;
the property to the east is commercial and industrial; the
property to the south is used residentially; the property to the
north is railroad track and commercial and industrial.
AMBROSE,
fITZDERALD
d CROOKSTON
Atlomeys mE
Counsebrs
P.O. Boz IR7
MMEW, M~Iw
l9MR
TWWw«rBM~M1
7. That a proper notice has been given as required by law
~MBROSE,
PIRGER~LD
d CROONSTON
AROm~y~rM
CouneNOn
P.O. Box ~T1
MNgNn, WYw
67M2
T~MpIgM lMIMt
and all procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission have
been given and followed;
8. That the property is presently vacant.
9. That the Applicant has submitted petitions signed by
at least 758 of the people owning property within 300 feet of the
property indicating their approval of the use of the property as
requested by Applicants.
CONCLUSIONS
1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local
Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have
been met including the mailing of notice to owners of property
within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the applicant's
property and having obtained the consent of 758 of the owners of
property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the
applicant's property;
2. That the City of Meridian has authority to grant
conditional uses pursuant to 67-6512, Idaho Code, and, pursuant
to 11-2-418 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of
Meridian, Idaho;
3. That the City of Meridian has authority to place
conditions on a conditional use permit and the use of .the
property pursuant to 67-6512, Idaho Code, and pursuant to
11-2-418(D) of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of
Meridian, Idaho;
4. That 11-2-418(C) of the Revised and Compiled
AMBROSE,
iRZGERAID
6 CROOKSTON
ABMM,~ rM
CouneMas
V.O.OOa /Y7
MuMW, MtliO
B9H7
TaMpAOM MH~l7
Ordinances of the City of Meridian. sets forth the standards under
which the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council
shall review applications for Conditional Use Permits; that upon
a review of those requirements and a review of the facts
presented and the conditions of the area, the Planning and Zoning
Commission specifically concludes as follows:
a. The use, would in fact, constitute a conditional use
and a conditional use permit would be required by
ordinance.
b. The use would be harmonious with and in accordance
with the Comprehensive Plan but the Zoning Ordinance
requires a conditional use permit to allow the use.
c. The use apparently would be designed and constructed,
to be harmonious in appearance with the intended
character of the general vicinity.
d. That the use may be haaardous and adequate safeguards
need to be taken to guard from injury but the use
should not be disturbing to existing or future
neighboring uses.
e. The property has sewer and water service available.
f. The use would not create excessive additional
requirements at public cost for public facilities and
services and the use would not be detrimental to the
economic welfare of the community.
g. The use would not involve a use, activity, process,
r~
material, equipment or conditions of operation that
would be detrimental to person, property or the
general welfare by reason of excessive production of
traffic or noise.
There is sufficient parking for the property and the
proposed use.
The development and uses will not result in the
destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic
feature of major importance.
AMBROSE,
FITZGERALD
B CROOKSTON
Anomsys rm
Counaslon
P.O. Boa I2T
MwWMn, WYro
HM2
T~hp~oN BB&IM1
~:-. _. .
APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts
and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions.
ROLL CALL:
Commissioner Morrow Voted ~t'~t~~
Commissioner Alidjani Voted ~IL~l~
Commissioner Johnson Voted ~/Pf~
Commissioner Shearer Voted ~ F'i~-
Commissioner Cole Voted ~~
Chairman Spencer (Tie Breakez) Voted
DECISION AND RECOMMENDATION
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby
recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they
approve the Conditional Use Permit requested by the Applicant for
the property described in the application with the conditions set
forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and that the
property be required to meet the water and sewer requirements and
the fire and life safety codes.
MOTION:
APPROVED: Y DISAPPROVED:
AMBROSE,
FITZGERAID
d CROOKBTON
Attortwyl YW
CiWnM11M
V.O.80.137
MM01n, WMo
e~e1x
;,- .;;
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DEPARTMENT
650 Main
Boise, Idaho 83702
October 29, 1986
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
Meridian City Hall
728 Meridian Street
Meridian, Idaho 84642
Dear Planning & Zoning Commission Members:
BUILDING•SION
PLANNING DIVISION
ZONING DIVISION
Phone: (208) 383-4423
(208) 383-4424
(208) 383-4424
~~,Y Co~~.~ ~
Ada County proposes to amend Title 8 of the Ada County Code (Ada
County Zoning Ordinance) to provide a more realistic method of
processing subdivision plat applications.
Presently, our Zoning Ordinance places all subdivisions in the
category of Planned Developments, this causes a lengthy and time
consuming processing. A re-cap of county subdivision processing over
the past 3 years shows that only 4 or 5 subdivision plats could be
described as being Planned Developments. The greatest percentage of
the subdivision plats processed were conventional plats without any of
the amenities usually connected with Planned Developments.
This situation is unique into Ada County since no other governmental
body in the county is required to process subdivisions under these
restrictions.
The proposed amendments will still provide for the processing of
subdivision plats under the Planned Development Section of our Zoning
Ordinance (Chapter 9.0) when a subdivision is in fact a Planned
Development. The proposed amendments will also provide for the
processing of subdivision plats that are not developed under Chapter
9.0, which will account for approximately 90~ of the County's
subdivision processing.
These amendments will not affect the Area of Impact Agreements or the
referral process between Meridian and Ada County.
The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing on
December 11, 1986 to consider these amendments. We solicit your
comments for presentation to the Commission.
Sincerely,
Conr-d `^' ~~,~
PLANNER ZI
CK/dd
ORDINANCE ~
• •
AN ORDINANCE Ah1ElVDING TITLE 8 OF ADA COUNTI' CODE, THE ADA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE:
r
PR01'IDING FOR "SUBDIVISIONS" TO BE A PRINCIPAL PERDIITTID USE IN ANY ZONING DISTRICT;
RE-DEFINING "SUBDIVISION. OF LAND" AS A PLA,^dNI:D DEVELOPhiII^JT.
BE IT ORDAINID BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY CODPiISSION'ERS, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, THAT
PURSUANT TO THE POWER VESTED IN THE1 BY ARTICLE 12, SECTION 2 OF THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION AND TITLE 31, CfIAPTER 8 OF THE IDAHO CODE, THAT THE FOLLOW'II\G SECTIONS
OF TITLE 8 OF THE ADA COUNTY CODE THE AD:1 COUM'Y ZONING ORDINANCE~ARE IIEREBI'
AbIENDED, MODIFIID OR REPEALID, AS FOLLOIVS:
ADD: "SUBDIVISIONS, AS DEFINED IN TTIIS TITLE" TO THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS:
8-4A-2, 8-4B-2, 8-5-3, 8-6A-3, 8-6B-3, 8-6C-3, 8-6D-3, 8-7A3, 8-7B-3, 8-7C-3,
8-7D-3, 8-7E-3.
ADD: SUBDIVISION OF LAND IVHEN DEVELOPED TINDER CI4IPTER 9 OF THIS TITLE, FER~IITTING
FLEXIBILITY OF DESIGN AND VARIETY IN DEVELOTfi1ENT TO TIC FOLLOWING SECTIONS:
8-5-2, 8-6A-ZC, 8-6B-2C, 8-6C-2C, 8-6D-2C, 8-7A-2B, 8-7B-2B, 8-7C-2B, 8-7D-2B,
8-7E-2A.
ADD: NEW SECTION 8-13-13 THE SUBDIVIDING 01? LAND (SUBDIVISIONS)_SIIALL BE_A PERMITTED
USE_IN_ANY ZONING DISTRICT. PROVIDING SAID SUBD.IVISION_ COMPLIES_WITH TI IE__STAMIA}2nS,
CONTAINID IN CHAPTER 10 OF THIS TITLE AND TVITH THE DESIGN AND DII`tENSIONAL STANDARDS_
OI: ,THE APPROPRIATE ZONING DISTRICT'.
APPROVID THIS DAY OF
BOARD OF COUNTY CODMISSIONERS
Doyle C. Dlrner, airman
Mic ael L. Jo son, Commissioner
Rucle, Commissioner
ATTEST
1986.