2008 06-19(:':>**-WE IAN: - MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING
REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
City Council Chambers
33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho
Thursday, June 19, 2008 at 7:00 p.m.
"Although the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony,
all presentations before the Mayor and City Council are expected
to be truthful and honest to best of the ability of the presenter."
1. Roll -call Attendance:
_X Tom O'Brien O Wendy Newton-Huckabay
X Michael Rohm X Joe Marshall
X David Moe - chairman
2. Adoption of the Agenda: Approve as Amended
3. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of June 5, 2008 Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting: Approve
4. Public Hearing: PP 08-007 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 21
building lots on 12.62 acres for Una Mas by Una Mas, LLC — 3945 E.
Ustick Road: Recommend Approval to City Council
5. Public Hearing: AZ 08-007 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 4.79
acres from RUT to C -C zoning district for Shops at Victory by LDR-
II/DMG, LLC — 3210 S. Eagle Road: Continue Public Hearing to July
17, 2008
6. Public Hearing: PP 08-006 Request for Preliminary Plat for 3 building
lots on 3.68 acres in a proposed C -C zoning district for Shops at Victory
by LDR-II/DMG, LLC — 3210 S. Eagle Road: Continue Public Hearing to
July 17, 2008
7. Public Hearing: CUP 08-011 Request for Conditional Use Permit
approval for a drive-thru pharmacy in a proposed C -C zoning district within
300 feet of an existing residence per UDC 11-4-3-11 for Shops at Victory
by LDR-II/DMG, LLC — 3210 S. Eagle Road: Continue Public Hearing to
July 17, 2008
Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda — June 19, 2008 Page 1 of 2
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
8. Public Hearing: CUP 08-013 Request for Conditional Use Permit for a
personal service shop in the O -T zoning district that does not meet the
criteria of the Downtown Meridian Design Guidelines for Mira Bella Salon
by Jerry Williams — 1645 W. 1St Street: Continue Public Hearing to July
3, 2008
9. Public Hearing: PP 08-005 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 5
commercial lots and 1 other lot on 10 acres in a C -G zoning district for
Knighthill Center by James Wylie — SWC of W. Chinden Boulevard and
N. Linder Road: Recommend Approval to City Council
10. Public Hearing: CUP 08-012 Request for Conditional Use Permit
approval for a drive-thru establishment in a C -C zone within 300 feet of
another drive-thru facility for Silverstone Corporate Plaza by Sundance
Company — 3421 E. Overland Road: Approve
Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda — June 19, 2008 Page 2 of 2
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
q
3.
P
�
�vi� �O��c Noicc
T TTT A L TJ.
IDIAN MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING
IDAHO REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
City Council Chambers
33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho
Thursday, June 19, 2008 at 7:00 p.m.
`Although the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony,
all presentations before the Mayor and City Council are expected
to be truthful and honest to best of the ability of the presenter."
Roll -call Attendance:
Tom O'Brien Wendy Newton-Huckabay
Michael Rohm Joe Marshall
David Moe - chairman
Adoption of the Agenda:
Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of June 5, 2008 Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting:
4. Public Hearing: PP 08-007 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 21
building lots on 12.62 acres for Una Mas by Una Mas, LLC — 3945 E.
Ustick Road:
5. Public Hearing: AZ 08-007 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 4.79
acres from RUT to C -C zoning district for Shops at Victory by LDR-
II/DMG, LLC — 3210 S. Eagle Road:
6. Public Hearing: PP 08-006 Request for Preliminary Plat for 3 building
lots on 3.68 acres in a proposed C -C zoning district for Shops at Victory
by LDR-II/DMG, LLC — 3210 S. Eagle Road:
7. Public Hearing: CUP 08-011 Request for Conditional Use Permit
approval for a drive-thru pharmacy in a proposed C -C zoning district within
300 feet of an existing residence per UDC 11-4-3-11 for Shops at Victory
by LDR-II/DMG, LLC — 3210 S. Eagle Road:
8. Public Hearing: CUP 08-013 Request for Conditional Use Permit for a
personal service shop in the O -T zoning district that does not meet the
Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda — June 19, 2008 Page 1 of 2
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
5
Y4Y�„Ly 4n'S'
# X1 J
O
pft
F .
!
'Y
+'aF?
>ie
i
i
F
q
3.
P
�
�vi� �O��c Noicc
T TTT A L TJ.
IDIAN MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING
IDAHO REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
City Council Chambers
33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho
Thursday, June 19, 2008 at 7:00 p.m.
`Although the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony,
all presentations before the Mayor and City Council are expected
to be truthful and honest to best of the ability of the presenter."
Roll -call Attendance:
Tom O'Brien Wendy Newton-Huckabay
Michael Rohm Joe Marshall
David Moe - chairman
Adoption of the Agenda:
Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of June 5, 2008 Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting:
4. Public Hearing: PP 08-007 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 21
building lots on 12.62 acres for Una Mas by Una Mas, LLC — 3945 E.
Ustick Road:
5. Public Hearing: AZ 08-007 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 4.79
acres from RUT to C -C zoning district for Shops at Victory by LDR-
II/DMG, LLC — 3210 S. Eagle Road:
6. Public Hearing: PP 08-006 Request for Preliminary Plat for 3 building
lots on 3.68 acres in a proposed C -C zoning district for Shops at Victory
by LDR-II/DMG, LLC — 3210 S. Eagle Road:
7. Public Hearing: CUP 08-011 Request for Conditional Use Permit
approval for a drive-thru pharmacy in a proposed C -C zoning district within
300 feet of an existing residence per UDC 11-4-3-11 for Shops at Victory
by LDR-II/DMG, LLC — 3210 S. Eagle Road:
8. Public Hearing: CUP 08-013 Request for Conditional Use Permit for a
personal service shop in the O -T zoning district that does not meet the
Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda — June 19, 2008 Page 1 of 2
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
5
Y4Y�„Ly 4n'S'
# X1 J
a i
i
i
F
e
criteria of the Downtown Meridian Design Guidelines for Mira Bella Salon
by Jerry Williams —1645 W. 1St Street:
9. Public Hearing: PP 08-005 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 5
commercial lots and 1 other lot on 10 acres in a C -G zoning district for
Knighthill Center by James Wylie — SWC of W. Chinden Boulevard and
N. Linder Road:
10. Public Hearing: CUP 08-012 Request for Conditional Use Permit
approval for a drive-thru establishment in a C -C zone within 300 feet of
another drive-thru facility for Silverstone Corporate Plaza by Sundance
Company — 3421 E. Overland Road:
Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda — June 19, 2008 Page 2 of 2
All materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
. t
F
r
Date/Time 06-16-2008
Local ID 1 2088884218
Local ID 2
Total Panes Scanned : 2
® Broadcast Report 14W I
02:57:59 p.m. Transmit Header Text Cltyof Meridian Idaho
Local Name 1 Line 1
Local Name 2 Line 2
This document: Failed
(reduced sample and details below)
Document size : 8.5"x11 "
PkAV- Pps+ Re ?VIO `C MO -f u-
CY i. IDIAN*,- MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING
t sA A ti o REGULAR MEETING .
AGENDA
City Council Chamber
33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho
Thursday, June 19, 2008 at 7:00 p.m.
Although the City of Merldien no longer requires swam testimony,
all presentations before the Mayor and City Council ere expected
to be tndhful and honest to best of the abHlly of the presenter.'
1. Ralf -call Attendance:
Tom CYBrlen Wendy Newton-Huckabay
Michael Rohm Joe Marshall
David Moe - chairman
2. Adoption of the Agenda:
3. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of June S, 2008 Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting:
4, Public Hearing: PP 08.007 Request for Preliminary Piot approval of 21
building lots on 12.62 acres for Una Mas by Una Mas, LLC - 3946 E.
Ustick Road:
S. Public Hearing: AZ 08-007 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 4.79
acres from RUT to C -C zoning district for Shops at Victory by LDR
II/DMG, LLC - 3210 S. Eagle Road:
6. Public Hearing: PP 08.008 Request for Preliminary Plat for 3 building
lots on 3.68 acres in a proposed C -C zoning district for Shops at Victory
by LDR-II/DMG, LLC - 3210 S. Eagle Road:
7. Public Hearing: CUP 08.011 Request for Conditional Use Permit
approval for a drive-thru pharmacy In a proposed C -C zoning district within
300 fest of an existing residence per UDC 11-4-3-11 for Shops at Victory
by LDR-IIlDMG, LLC - 3210 S. Eagle Road:
IL Public Hearing: CUP 08-013 Request for Conditional Use Permit for a
personal service shop in the QT zoning district that does not meet the
Maddhn Plavft and zordng C,omftelon Agenda — June 18, 2txt$ Page i of 2
A I rnatarlele ptesmfmd at pWx% oreattrgs shag become property of the Ck of Hattan.
Anyone desWng accommodation for dbaAttifta related to doc marts and/or hearing,
please corded the City Gatti® COMM at 8884433 at toast 48 hours pdor to R* pubic meeting.
Total Panes Confirmed : 36
No.
Job
Remote Station
StartTime
Duration
Pages
Line
Mode
Job Type
Results
001
188
3810160
02:33:58 p.m. 06-16-2008
00:01:45
2/2
1
EC
HS
CP9600
002
188
8989551
02:33:58 p.m. 06-16-2008
00:00:28
2/2
1
EC
HS
CP19200
003
188
2088848723
02:33,58 p.m. 06-16-2008
00,00:54
2/2
1
EC
HS
CP16800
004
188
8886854
02:33:58 p.m. 06-16-2008
00:00:21
2/2
1
EC
HS
CP31200
005
188
2088985501
02:33:58 p.m. 06-16-2008
00:00:27
2/2
1
EC
HS
CP31200
006
188
8467366
02:33:58 p.m. 06-16-2008
00:00:21
2/2
1
EC
HS
CP28800
007
188
8950390
02:33:58 p.m. 06-16-2008
00:00:37
2/2
1
EC
HS
CP26400
Broadcast Report
Date/Time 06-16-2008 02:58:06 p.m. Transmit Header Text City of Meridian Idaho
Local ID 1 2088884218 Local Name 1 Line 1
Local ID 2 Local Name 2 Line 2
No.
Job
Remote Station
StartTime
Duration
Pages
Line
Mode
Job Type
Results
008
188
2088882682
02:33:58 p.m. 06-16-2008
00:00:21
2/2
1
EC
HS
CP33600
009
188
208 387 6393
02:33:58 p.m. 06-16-2008
00:00:44
2/2
1
EC
HS
CP14400
010
188
2877909
02:33:58 p.m. 06-16-2008
00:00:23
2/2
1
EC
HS
CP28800
011
188
8885052
02:33:58 p.m. 06-16-2008
00:00:21
2/2
1
EC
HS
CP31200
012
188
8881983
02:33:58 p.m. 06-16-2008
00:00:24
2/2
1
IEC
HS
CP26400
013
188
2083776449
02:33:58 p.m. 06-16-2008
00:00:43
2/2
1
EC
HS
CP14400
014
188
4679562
02:33:58 p.m. 06-16-2008
00:00:22
2/2
1
EC
HS
CP28800
015
188
8886700
02:33:58 p.m. 06-16-2008
00:00:01
0/2
1
--
HS
FA
016
188
8884022
02:33:58 p.m. 06-16-2008
00:01:15
2/2
1
EC
HS
CP14400
017
1188
13886924
02:33:58 p.m. 06-16-2008
00:00:45
2/2
1
EC
HS
CP14400
018
188
18841159
02:33:58 p.m. 06-16-2008
00:00:23
2/2
11
EC
IHS
CP28800
019
1188
18840744
02:33:58 p.m. 06-16-2008
00:00:22
2/2
11
JEC
IHS
CP28800
Abbreviations:
HS: Host send PL: Polled local
HR: Host receive PR: Polled remote
WS: Waiting send MS: Mailbox save
MP: Mailbox print TU: Terminated by user
CP: Completed TS: Terminated by system G3: Group
FA: Fall RP: Report EC: Error Correct
1.
Cq/(ERjDIAN*,,_'.-
E
I��I-I
MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING
REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
City Council Chambers
33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho
Thursday, June 19, 2008 at 7:00 p.m.
"Although the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony,
all presentations before the Mayor and City Council are expected
to be truthful and honest to best of the ability of the presenter."
Roll -call Attendance:
—Ag�' Tom O'Brien Wendy Newton-Huckabay
Michael Rohm Joe Marshall
,)<- David Moe - chairman
2. Adoption of the Agenda: A oprove, aas Amend a
3. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of June 5, 2008 Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting: Approve
4. Public Hearing: PP 08-007 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 21
building lots on 12.62 acres for Una Mas by Una Mas, LLC — 3945 E.
Ustick Road:
Red%ommand pprovaX `10 (?-;t %orAG'.Q
5. Public Hearing: AZ 08-007 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 4.79
acres from RUT to C -C zoning district for Shops at Victory by LDR-
II/DMG, LLC — 3210 S. Eagle Road:
6. Public Hearing: PP 08-006 Request for Preliminary Plat for 3 building
lots on 3.68 acres in a proposed C -C zoning district for Shops at Victory
by LDR-II/DMG, LLC — 3210 S. Eagle Road:
7. Public Hearing: CUP 08-011 Reques for Conditional Use Permit
approval for a drive-thru pharmacy in a proposed C -C zoning district within
300 feet of an existing residence per UDC 11-4-3-11 for Shops at Victory
by LDR-II/DMG, LLC — 3210 S. Eagle Road: D
49e1 `i j k)c-Lt_
8. Public Hearing: CUP 08-013 Request for Conditional Use Permit for a
personal service shop in the O -T zoning district that does not meet the
Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda — June 19, 2008 Page 1 of 2
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
0 0
criteria of the Downtown Meridian Design Guidelines for Mira Bella Salon
by erry Williams —1645 W. 1St Street:
9. Public Hearing: PP 08-005 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 5
commercial lots and 1 other lot on 10 acres in a C -G zoning district for
Knighthill Center by James Wylie — SWC of W. Chinden Boulevard and
N Linder Road:
10. Public Hearing: CUP 08-012 Request for Conditional Use Permit
approval for a drive-thru establishment in a C -C zone within 300 feet of
another drive-thru facility for Silverstone Corporate Plaza by Sundance
Company — 3421 E. Overland Road: ApprDV(�
Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda — June 19, 2008 Page 2 of 2
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
t
t.
Y L- ➢ N.W -h' �:. 5 ...:�., f ^`z..
k`J,.t4�FFe.`^a X,,.
,T.
,"�
�y
:d �,
Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission June 19, 2008
Meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of June 9, 2008, was called
to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman David Moe.
Members Present: Chairman David Moe, Commissioner Joe Marshall, Commissioner
Michael Rohm, and Commissioner Tom O'Brien.
Members Absent: Commissioner Wendy Newton-Huckabay.
Others Present: Ted Baird, Machelle Hill, Caleb Hood, Sonya Watters, Bill Parson, Scott
Steckline, and Dean Willis.
Item 1: Roll -Call Attendance:
Roll -call
Wendy Newton-Huckabay X Tom O'Brien
X Michael Rohm X Joe Marshall
X David Moe - Chairman
Moe: Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the regularly scheduled
meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission for June 19th, 2008. Like to call this
meeting to order and ask the clerk to call roll, please.
Item 2: Adoption of the Agenda:
Moe: Thank you very much. Next item on the agenda is the adoption of the agenda
and there are a couple changes tonight. We do have a couple hearings that we will be
continuing. Items 5, 6 and 7 for Shops at Victory that will be continued to our regularly
scheduled meeting of July the 17th. And Item No. 8 for the Mira Bella Salon will be
continued to the meeting of July 3rd. Other than that, the rest of the agenda will stay
the same. So, can I get a motion to approve the revised agenda?
O'Brien: So moved.
Marshall: Second.
Moe: It's been moved and seconded to approve the revised agenda. All those in favor
say aye. Opposed? That motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Item 3: Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of June 5, 2008 Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting:
Meridian Planning & Zoning
June 19, 2008
Page 2 of 24
Moe: Next item on the agenda is the Consent Agenda. We have one item on that; that
would be the approval of the meeting minutes of June 5th, 2008, Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting. Are there any changes or comments?
Rohm: None.
Moe: None? Well, can I get a motion to approve the Consent Agenda?
Marshall: Mr. Chair, I so move.
O'Brien: Second.
Moe: It has been moved and seconded to approve the Consent Agenda. All those in
favor say aye. Opposed? That motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Moe: We are just moving right along, folks. Before I open the first Public Hearing,
although we don't have a huge amount of folks in here and I know I see faces I have
seen before, so if I'm repeating myself, just listen anyway. But I'm going to kind of give
you a brief format that we do for our meetings. I will open the hearing, ask the staff to
give a presentation on the project that is underway. They will give a brief overview of
that. At that point I will ask the applicant to come up and the applicant will have 15
minutes to address any issues from the staff report or, basically, give their opinion as to
why this project should go forward. After that there are sign-up sheets in the back, if
you so desire to speak on any of the hearings you can sign up and I will ask you to
come forward and you would have three minutes to state your case and ask your
questions. After all the signatures are complete, I will ask the audience if there is
anyone else that would like to speak and you would be more than welcome to do so.
After all the audience has been taken care of, I will, then, ask the applicant to come
back up and rebut any comments and whatnot that were made during the Public
Hearing portion and, then, we'll go forward from there.
Item 4: Public Hearing: PP 08-007 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 21
building lots on 12.62 acres for Una Mas by Una Mas, LLC — 3945 E.
Ustick Road:
Moe: So, having said that, I would like to open the Public Hearing PP 08-007 for Una
Mas and start with the staff report, please.
Watters: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. Get my slide working
here. The application before you is a preliminary plat request for 21 building lots on
12.62 acres of land, zoned C -G. The property is located at 3945 East Ustick Road on
the south side Ustick, approximately a quarter mile east of the Eagle-Ustick intersection.
Uses that surround this site are Lowe's retail store to the north, zoned
Meridian Planning & Zoning
June 19, 2008
Page 3 of 24
C -G. A church and rural residential uses to the east, zoned RUT in Ada County. And
property to the west and south, zoned C -G, that's currently in the development process.
A little history on this site. A large portion of this site was annexed in 2005 with a C -G
zone and a development agreement. A smaller portion was annexed in 2007 for Allys
Way has been constructed with a C -G district and a development agreement. A
Conditional Use Permit was approved for a day care center on the southern end of this
site that has expired. A new Conditional Use Permit will be required if the day care
center is desired to be constructed there in the future. There is an aerial view of the
property. All of the existing structures have been removed. There is one tree left on the
site. This is the preliminary plat. It consists of 21 building lots, ranging in size from .35
of an acre to 1.61 acres. Three access points are proposed to the subdivision from'
Allys Way, one here, one here, and one here. No access points are proposed or
approved from Ustick Road. Ustick -- access to Ustick is prohibited. ACHD submitted
draft comments on this application that are not included in the staff report that support
the access points proposed to the subdivision. Two private streets are proposed from
Allys Way for addressing purposes and for access to Allys from the properties to the
west. They are the northern most and the southern most access drives here. The Milk
Lateral runs along the southern boundary of the site. It was right here. It's been
relocated right along the southern property boundary. It has been tiled. This is the
proposed landscape plan. A 35 foot wide buffer is required along Ustick Road, an
entryway corridor, and a 20 foot wide buffer is required along Allys Way, a collector
street. No buffer to residential uses is proposed or required with this application as
there is a 20 foot buffer here and Allys Way serves as a buffer. The landscaping
complies with the UDC requirements as shown on the plan. The applicant has
submitted a conceptual development plan showing how the site may develop in the
future. It shows 25 buildings ranging in size from 2,500 square feet to 12,675 square
feet. Off-street parking is shown. Private streets for addressing and internal access
drives for circulation within this and cross -access to the west are shown on the plan.
The applicant has submitted building elevations for future buildings on the site. This is
an elevation of the proposed day care, so I believe the applicant is still proposing it, but
they are going to have to go through the Conditional Use Permit process again, as I
stated. The applicant has submitted architectural standards for future buildings on the
site that allow for individual architectural creativity, while assuring common architectural
features or materials that will occur throughout the project. Standards pertaining to roof
design, number of stories, exterior wall materials, accent materials, entryways,
windows, and colors. And these are just photos of varying architectural features that
may be used in future buildings on the site. Kind of a little bit of everything here. No
uses are proposed with the subject plat at this time. Because this property is
designated as mixed use regional on the future land use map, staff strongly
recommends that a mix of uses be provided on this site, such as retail, nonretail
commercial, public/quasi-public and multi -family residential uses, in compliance with the
MUR standards listed in the comp plan. No letters of testimony have been received on
this application. The applicant has submitted a letter to the city stating that they are in
agreement with the staff report. Staff recommends approval for the conditions in the
staff report based on the findings in Exhibit B. Staff will stand for any questions at this
time.
7
Meridian Planning & Zoning
June 19, 2008
Page 4 of 24
Moe: Thank you very much. Commissioners, any questions of staff?
O'Brien: I have one question, Mr. Chairman.
Moe: Okay.
O'Brien: Sonya, how close is that street -- is Allys Way to the Lowe's entrance on the
Lowe's south side? Is there any consideration of conflict of cars coming and going onto
Ustick Road from both Lowe's and -- and the street?
Watters: Chairman Moe, Commissioners, Commissioner O'Brien, Allys Way currently
exists on the north side of Ustick Road. It is just an extension of that existing street.
The existing drive to the front of the Lowe's store is approximately a little over an eighth
of a mile from the intersection. The entrance to Allys is about a quarter mile.
O'Brien: It doesn't look like it's much conflict, so that's the only question I have. Thank
you.
Watters: I don't believe so.
Moe: Any other questions? Would the applicant like to come forward?
Lauerman: Hi. Denise Lauerman, 3501 West Elder. I'm here representing the owners
for EHM Engineers. I'm just here to concur that the owners agree with the staff report
conditions and don't have any further statements to make, I guess.
Moe: Okay. I understand you're going on record to say that. That's great.
Lauerman: Okay.
Moe: Any questions of the applicant?
O'Brien; I have none.
Marshall: No.
Rohm: I just have one. That one component of the mixed use with the residential, do
you have any ideas as to how you're going to respond to that portion of it? Just -- I'm
curious, more than anything.
Lauerman: I think I'll let the owner take that one.
Hansen: Burke Hansen with Una Mas. We have had various inquiries about pieces of
that land, ranging anywhere from office to retail to potential residential and we are just
u
r
x
t
/
i T t k'V ; �.h R•
d
�
ax
Meridian Planning & Zoning
a a
June 19, 2008
Page 5 of 24
kind evaluating our options at this point in time to see what might make the most sense
as that comer develops.
Rohm: So, is -- do you read the staff report as that being a required component or just
a component to be considered?
Hansen: I think it's after a mixed use. I don't -- I don't read it as residential being a
required mixed use within -- within that property.
Rohm: Okay. Okay. Thank you. Does staff concur with that?
Watters: Yeah. Commissioners, I -- staff did not make it a requirement as a condition
of approval, because the property was annexed in 2005 and 2007 prior to the new
mixed use regional standards in the comp plan.
Rohm: That --
Watters: So, before they would probably have complied with it, but now it's a little bit
different. So, we are just recommending that they follow those current guidelines.
Rohm: Okay. Thank you.
Moe: Well, there is no one signed up, so if there is anyone that would like to come
forward, you're more than welcome at this time. Don't all rush now. Thank you very
much. Okay. I see no one coming forward, so what do you think, folks?
Rohm: I think we should close the Public Hearing.
Moe: Well --
Rohm: But I can't see, so somebody else has to do it.
Marshall: I would -- Mr. Chair, I would move that we close the Public Hearing at this
time.
Rohm: On?
Marshall: Oh. On --
Moe: He can't read, remember.
Marshall: PP 08-007.
Rohm: Second.
5y
§ r s r s£'y+f
F
3
P j
£
s c x
r
y
i
w
p" sspp
}
n
4< ,h
.5 q
3 a a
s
L 4.
Pfri
�
t
ir= r
Meridian Planning & Zoning
June 19, 2008
Page 6 of 24
Moe: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on PP 08-007.
All those in favor say aye. Opposed? That motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT.
O'Brien: Mr. Chairman, one question. The latest applicant I don't believe gave his
address. How important is that for him to publicly give his address? He only gave his
name.
Baird: Mr. Chair, it's on the record. It's in the record.
O'Brien: Okay.
Moe: Okay. Thank you.
Baird: And just for information, that's just so we can identify who they are -- we know
who they are, so I would not recommend reopening the record for that.
Moe: Commissioners, can I -- we closed the Public Hearing. Are there any other
comments? Mr. Rohm, do you have any comments on this project?
Rohm: No, sir.
Marshall: My comments are simply the one thing I would have liked to have seen, at
least with the preliminary plat, is more pedestrian friendly. It looks very vehicle oriented
and I would like to see more pathways through it, more access by bicycle and foot, but
beyond that that's --
Moe: Just to kind of respond to that, I would say that looking at the plan I'm very happy
with it, simply because when it came before us for annexation, basically this plan came
forward and they have taken it and followed it through the plat process and it's coming
as they brought it in. So, I think it's pretty nice.
Marshall: For the most part I agree.
Moe: Well, all too often what we see in an annexation when we finally get to a plat, we
see lots of changes quite often and so it's nice to see one follow itself through.
O'Brien: Chairman, I have nothing to add. I just -- other than I think it's a -- I like to see
the growth happening like it is, especially in that area. I think it's a good project.
Moe: Well, then, in that case --
Marshall: Mr. Chair, after considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move
to recommend approval to the City Council of file number PP 08-007, as presented in
the staff report for the hearing date of June 19th, 2008, with no modifications.
r.n
�6
s'
t t
k
4 ,
r
Meridian Planning & Zoning
June 19, 2008
Page 7 of 24
O'Brien: Second.
Rohm: Second.
Moe: It's been moved and seconded to approve PP 08-007. All those in favor say aye.
Opposed? That motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Item 5: Public Hearing: AZ 08-007 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 4.79
acres from RUT to C -C zoning district for Shops at Victory by LDR-
II/DMG, LLC — 3210 S. Eagle Road:
Item 6: Public Hearing: PP 08-006 Request for Preliminary Plat for 3 building
lots on 3.68 acres in a proposed C -C zoning district for Shops at Victory
by LDR-II/DMG, LLC — 3210 S. Eagle Road:
Item 7: Public Hearing: CUP 08-011 Request for Conditional Use Permit
approval for a drive-thru pharmacy in a proposed C -C zoning district within
300 feet of an existing residence per UDC 11-4-3-11 for Shops at Victory
by LDR-I I/DMG, LLC — 3210 S. Eagle Road:
Moe: Okay. At this time I'd like to open the Public Hearing AZ 08-007, PP 08-006, and
CUP 08-011 for -- all for Shops at Victory, for the sole purpose of continuing it to the
regularly scheduled Planning and Zoning meeting of July 17th, 2008.
Rohm: So moved.
Marshall: Second.
Moe: It's been moved and seconded to continue AZ 08-007, PP 08-006, and CUP 08-
011 for Shops at Victory to the July 17th, 2008, meeting. All those in favor say aye.
Opposed? That motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Item 8: Public Hearing: CUP 08-013 Request for Conditional Use Permit for a
personal service shop in the O -T zoning district that does not meet the
criteria of the Downtown Meridian Design Guidelines for Mira Bella Salon
by Jerry Williams —1645 W. 1St Street:
Moe: At this time I would like to open the Public Hearing for CUP 08-013 for the Mira
Bella Salon for the sole purpose of continuing that hearing to the regularly scheduled
meeting of the Planning and Zoning for July 3rd, 2008. Can I get a motion to continue?
Meridian Planning & Zoning
June 19, 2008
Page 8 of 24
Marshall: So moved.
Rohm: Second.
Moe: It's been moved and
scheduled Planning and Zoning
Opposed? That motion carries.
•
seconded to continue CUP 08-013 to the regularly
meeting of July 3rd, 2008. All those in favor say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Item 9: Public Hearing: PP 08-005 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 5
commercial lots and 1 other lot on 10 acres in a C -G zoning district for
Knighthill Center by James Wylie — SWC of W. Chinden Boulevard and
N. Linder Road:
Moe: At this time I'd like to open the Public Hearing PP 08-005 for Knighthill Center and
have the staff report.
Parsons: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. The application
before you tonight is a preliminary plat consisting of five commercial building lots and
one common lot on ten acres in a C -G zone. Concurrently, the applicant has submitted
a miscellaneous application to modify the existing development agreement to remove
the previously approved concept plan and replace it with the proposed plan. Private
street approval was also requested that will provide access to the development and
provide connectivity with the surrounding developments. The subject site is located on
the southwest comer of West Chinden Boulevard and North Linder Road. The property
is bordered on the north by Knightsky Estates, zoned C -C and P -NC. That's Knighthill
there. Or Knightsky. To the south is Lochsa Falls No. 11, zoned R-4. To the west is
Lochsa Falls Subdivision No. 12, which is zoned R-4 and C -N and L -O. And to the east
is RUT zoned property. Here is the aerial of the site. Now you can see the site is
currently vacant. Again, you can see some of the stub streets that are proposed to be
extended into that site if it's approved tonight. A little history on this site. In 2006 this
site was annexed and zoned C -G. At that time it was also requested to be platted. It
was approved for a four lot plat and one common lot. Development was -- a
development agreement was required as part of that application process and the
applicant also submitted a concept plan that was approved and was tied to that existing
development agreement. The previous approval in 2006 also showed three -- proposed
three buildings on the site, roughly ranging approximately 109,000 square feet of retail
space on this site. The applicant is proposing a new concept plan tonight. Here they
are showing 13 buildings. This is proposed to be a -- possibly a bank site, a multi -
tenant space there, a convenience store slash gas station on the comer of Chinden and
Linder. And, then, you have a multi -tenant retail building here and, then, what the
applicant's done from the previous approval is actually add some office lots that will
actually buffer some of the more intense retail uses from the residential neighborhood.
And also access to the site is pretty much the same that was also approved in 2006.
There is no direct lot access proposed onto Chinden. Access will come via Linder Road
Meridian Planning & Zoning
June 19, 2008
Page 9 of 24
here. The applicant, again, has proposed private streets. So, here this is West Everest
Lane. It's a private street, currently constructed as a 25 foot road section. The
applicant is proposing to -- to mimic that and continue that on as a 25 foot road section
to this point and, then, from this north -south connection they are going to extend North
Gertie Place here and that will be a 32 foot road section. And, then, off of Linder they
are proposing a 36 foot wide road section and also as part of the development
agreement they were required to stub to this -- if you want to call it an outparcel, RUT
parcel, they are going to provide a driveway stub for that -- for that gentleman when
they come in and propose in the future to also take access onto Linder from that point.
A landscape plan was submitted with this application. However, the applicant submitted
the landscape plan approved with the 2006 project. The propose of the plan was only
to illustrate the required perimeter landscape buffers required for the proposed
subdivision. Now what's going to happen is we have actually conditioned the applicant
to submit a new landscape plan prior to the City Council. He will be required to have
that 35 landscape -- 35 foot landscape buffers along both -- along Chinden Boulevard
and North Linder Road and also provide a 25 foot landscape buffer adjacent to those
residential neighborhoods along the south -- southern edge and the western edge of the
property. The applicant has submitted some conceptual elevations. Here is what they
are proposing to show for their convenience store. Again, it's going to have some
stucco, some flat roof elements, with some -- the pitched roof there will be a metal.
Metal awnings to accent the glazing on the building and that should run along the front
-- the side of the building as well, with some stone accents. Here is what they are
proposing for their office use, their office building, and, then, these two buildings here
are representing their multi -tenant spaces. Again, primarily all the buildings are
proposed to be constructed of mixed material, stucco, rock accent, some timber facade
on the front to kind of accent the front of the building and, then, you can see some
modulating and different -- different pitch elements for the roofing. Staff is very
supportive of the elevations and we have also conditioned them and as a DA provision
to -- that any future building be substantially compliant with these elevations. Staff --
this concludes my presentation and I will be happy to answer any questions from the
Commission.
Moe: Thank you very much. Any questions of staff at this time?
Marshall: Mr. Chair, I do.
Moe: Yes, sir.
Marshall: Bill, can you tell me -- could this have been built in a C -C zone?
Parsons: Mr. Chairman, Commissioner Joe -- Commissioner Marshall, I believe so. I
mean there is really -- there is setbacks for the C -C zone. There is no setback
requirements for the C -G zone. The only difference is, basically, based on your design
review standards. In a C -G zone you typically can have structures up to 200,000
square feet before you have design review. In a C -C zone we require anything over
60,000 square feet to go through that. The other thing I'd point out, too, is your
Meridian Planning & Zoning
June 19, 2008
Page 10 of 24
conditional and your principally permitted uses are a little different in those two zones as
well. And that's about the only difference. But, yes, this probably could have happened
in a C -C zone.
Marshall: Thank you.
Moe: Any other questions?
O'Brien: None from me.
Moe: Would the applicant like to come forward, please. State your name and address
for the record.
Wiley: Good evening, James Wiley. 1676 North Clarendon, Eagle, Idaho. 83616. Mr.
Commissioner, Members of the -- or Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission.
Sorry. We agree with all the requirements of the Planning and Zoning Department for
this project. What we tried to do -- the prior subdivision had a grocery store plan. We
do not happen to have a grocery store that is available to go into this site at this point.
So, we have tried to revise it and in so doing, mixing some small office in the back, that
will allow a little bit of buffering between the residential and the heavy commercial and
still providing some multi -tenant, small user availability. On the northeast comer of this
property Eagle right now they have Fred Meyer trying to go into that comer, so I think
we will be able to mix well whatever they put in. I don't really -- as far as the elevations
went, many of the neighbors had a concern with, excuse me, the top elevation and I
don't know if you could put that up, Bill. That one on the right. They seemed to like the
lower one over here a little bit better. So, that was kind of the direction we were going
to head. And also when we had the neighborhood meeting they -- one of the main
concerns was the gas station and service C store that we originally had was further
south towards entrance off of Linder. The neighbors requested that we move it further
away toward the hard comer, which we did on this -- on this conceptual design. So, we
tried to address some of their issues in -- in coming up with this particular design for the
project. And if you have any questions I'm certainly available.
Moe: You won't have a problem getting the other landscape plans to -- for the City
Council meeting?
Wiley: No, we won't have any problem. The reason we -- we already had an existing
landscape plan from the prior approval. The exterior landscape is essentially the same
size, so we decided to do that. We will be happy to revise it.
Moe: Any other questions?
Rohm: Just curious. Do you plan on phasing this at all or do you plan on building it all
out at once?
Meridian Planning & Zoning
June 19, 2008
Page 11 of 24
Wiley: I'm sure we are not going to just build it all out, unless we have a massive run of
tenants or users coming in. We have the gas station C store. We already have
somebody who wants that. So, that would be our first construction project. In so doing
we put the streets in, the landscaping in, which, hopefully, would build some energy for
the other lots.
Rohm: Okay. That's kind of where I was going with that. Thank you.
Moe: Thank you very much.
Wiley: Thank you.
Moe: Ron and Sharon Taylor. Are you going to speak one at a time or together or --
Taylor: Ron Taylor. 6168 North Gertie Place, Meridian. 83646.
Moe: Thank you.
Taylor: Just have a couple of concerns and I think all the neighbors in the area -- I don't
know -- they didn't come tonight, but they said they were going to. Anyway, Gertie
Place is just -- it shows it there, but it's -- it's just a very short little cul-de-sac and that
we were told that that's what it was always going to be by the people we bought the
house from and we live right on the comer there, which is right there. And we would like
for that street to not go through. In talking with Mr. Wiley at the neighborhood meeting,
he said he didn't care whether it went through or not. And there is about 20 kids in that
little cul-de-sac area and on Rattlesnake right there that all play down in there and that
will just become a thoroughfare for 1,300 students at Rocky Mountain High School just
around the comer and everyone in the world cutting through our neighborhood, with no
stop signs, no speed bumps, and going into that development to get to the gas station
and the car wash. So, since he said he didn't really care whether it went through or not,
we would like for it not to go through or maybe put those -- I think they are called
bollards, like they have in the rest of the subdivision, so that in an emergency, if the fire
department had to get in through there -- which I doubt if they would go through there,
since the station is just down around the comer on Linder -- that they could take those
out and go in through there on emergency. But we don't really want that to become a
thoroughfare and I think that's what it's going to do. People already speed through that
area without any slowing down, because there is very few stop signs on any comer. On
this landscaping plan, I mean I see an entrance over there into that piece of property
over there adjacent to Linder Road, an entrance to that I would guess maybe I'd like to
have somebody explain why that was -- is not part of this that I picked up at Planning
and Zoning, this map here shows nothing at all about a proposed entrance into that lot.
And, if so, what's he going to do with it, because right now it looks like he has a body
shop there. He has probably 20 or 30 cars parked on that property.
Moe: Is there a pointer there that you can --
Meridian Planning & Zoning
June 19, 2008
Page 12 of 24
Taylor: I don't know much about pointers.
Moe: You should have a laser pointer there. Can you show that point on the screen for
us, please?
Taylor: This green thing or -- yeah. Okay. I'm sorry. That's not on this thing -- this
copy that I picked up from Planning and Zoning, it doesn't show any entrance there at
all to this deal and we are all curious as to what all this is here, because he has about at
least 20 to 30 cars there at all times doing body and fender work and I know that he's in
Ada County, not Meridian, so I guess if there is something planned here, we'd like to
know that. This is my fence right there and -- and also, Mr. Wiley, if he -- if he does go
through with this and you do approve it, we'd like to have that buffer right there and
have those trees. He said he has no problem with that when we talked with him. If he
does put it there, to make the trees closer together. We haven't, actually, seen a copy
of his landscaping plan, but have them closer together so that it does block our view of
any of those buildings and we'd like for Gertie Place not to go -- I don't think anyone
wants it to go through, so those are the things that -- we do appreciate the fact that he
has just flipped the thing and put the convenience store and gas station on the other
end, instead with 20 feet from my fence, so -- that's about all I have to say.
Moe: Any questions?
Marshall: I do have a question. Sir, I'm trying to understand why students from Rocky
Mountain High School would want to take the long route through your subdivision,
rather than taking the direct route right down Linder.
Taylor: Oh. Well, because there is probably going to be some that lives in our -- in our
subdivision and they could just come down through there or they could either go down
Cayuse Creek or -- and there could be plenty that don't live there.
Marshall: Right. But my point is that Rocky Mountain High School right down here;
they'd have to take a very indirect route to get back over here, rather than just right
down the road and in.
Taylor: Well, they could, but they are going to be going to that gas station down there.
Marshall: Right.
Taylor: And we didn't want that road there either. We didn't understand that there was
ever going to be a road in off of Linder 20 feet from our fence either. That was never
explained, so -- but I understand they are going to come down that way and the other
way, but there will be other people and I'm sure kids going in -- I don't have anything
wrong -- against kids, but I see what happens at lunchtime in all those areas and that
will be a nightmare. The traffic right there on that -- in that whole area right there, I don't
know if you have ever been there at 6:30 to about 8:30 in the morning or at nighttime,
that's bumper to bumper all the way from there, all the way to Hewlett Packard and I
Meridian Planning i£ Zoning
June 19, 2008
Page 13 of 24
can't imagine throwing anymore traffic on that comer without -- and no one's making
any attempt to widen the road or improve it. It's a two lane road and if you're going to
allow all this commercial developments, big Fred Meyer store -- well, that's Eagle, so
you don't have anything to do with that, but it's going to allow this traffic over there, isn't
anyone going to do anything to improve the road?
Rohm: Well, there are a lot of traffic studies going on and things that --
Taylor: I know, but how could they build the commercial developments and, you know,
plan for additional traffic, just keep throwing them up, no -- no improvements on the
roads, on a two lane road, you can't get out of that subdivision or into it a couple times a
day. So, I just -- I can't understand why all the things would be allowed without any
provisions to fix the roads.
Rohm: Mr. Chairman?
Moe: Mr. Rohm.
Rohm: I'd like to address that just a little bit if I could. Part of why we as a planning
group try to encourage connectivity between one parcel of ground, which would be to
the south, which you're talking about, to that to the north into this development is so that
the traffic that is internal to that subdivision already does not have to go out onto Linder
to access the development within this proposed project and that's to help keep the traffic
down on the main thoroughfares, not to encumber it further and like Commissioner
Marshall pointed out, the traffic that will be going to that gas station from the school
itself will use the existing roadway, which is Linder Road, not ingress through your
subdivision. So, it's to -- it's actually all of these thoughts by the planning group and by
this Commission are to help minimize the additional traffic out onto the thoroughfare.
And so that's just trying to respond to your -- to your query.
Moe: Thank you, Mr. Rohm. That was very good. Appreciate it. Sharon, did you want
to speak?
S.Taylor: Hi, I'm Sharon Taylor. I'm the other half of 6168 North Gertie Place. There is
really two neighbors that are concerned about this and we are both here tonight. My
concern with what you just said is that it isn't about coming off of Linder where that is
the only entrance into this Knighthill, it is that there is no reason to open up a whole
subdivision that's mostly children in that area that -- if you have been in Lochsa Falls,
there is no way to get out unless you know the pattern to get out. You will be lost in
there the rest of your life. I'm not just kidding. It's not easy to get in and out. So, once
they are in there what are they going to be doing, just driving around? So, we'd like to
stop it in that respect. And, then, we have Everest Lane. Do you see where Everest
Lane is? This is our entrance off of Chinden right there, Long Lake, Chinden. Well, if
my pointer works. Here is our entrance to Lochsa Falls, Long Lake. Right here. Here
is the street. Runs right along back into this proposed new area. Why can't that be the
exit in and out? Why does it have to be this little tiny private cul-de-sac where the
Meridian Planning & Zoning
June 19, 2008
Page 14 of 24
streets all merge together and you can't really tell where you're going. That's, really,
what we are here for tonight is, please, put bollards right there, so that those kids that
so enjoy that cul-de-sac will have a chance to grow up and play there and not have
Rocky Mountain High speeding in, gas station, out, miss the stop light right there.
That's it. Thank you.
Moe: Any questions?
S.Taylor: Did you understand Everest Lane?
Moe: Thank you very much. That was all that was signed up. If there is anyone else
that would like to speak, please, come.
Longlin: Hi. I'm Shawna Longlin. I live at 2615 -- or I'm sorry. That's where saw this
happen once before and it was a disaster. I live at 6183 North Gertie Place. I live
across the street and ails I can see is the nightmare that I had before. People flying
around the comer on both ends, because, basically, I'm going to be getting it -- how
does this work? Like this? Okay. Basically, I'm going to be getting it -- and it's a
custom home, but I'm going to be getting it, because -- and I can attest already, my 18
year old daughter, to avoid Chinden, because it is so difficult to get in and out of, goes
through the way she just said to get to Linder and she usually -- it's so bad -- the traffic
on Chinden is so bad, she usually -- that's the way she takes her little brother to school.
We go clear back to McMillan, back up to Locust Grove and he goes to school by
Locust Grove and Chinden. And to try to get down there, you're looking at 20, 30
minutes for two miles.
Rohm: Can you give me just the egress that you're talking about?
Longlin: So, what I'm saying is --
Rohm: I'm not following you.
Longlin: So, what I'm saying is is people already do cut through that neighborhood and
if this right here gets -- I live right there. Right on that comer. My house is that whole
side there. And I'm in the -- it's going to be difficult for me to try to be getting -- backing
out of my driveway, I'm going to have cars coming around on both ends at me and it's
going to be really difficult to back out quickly enough to see and there is a 20 foot berm
-- and that's the other thing was my concern, too, is my house -- my whole back patio,
from what I understood there was going to be two story office buildings there, so there
goes all our privacy. My back yard is going to be viewed into 24/7. Well, you know
what I mean. During business hours or whatever. And if they are going to be single
level or if they are one level or -- I mean that's why I bought this house and everything
and was to get out of -- from where I was before, because this same thing happened. I
lived on a comer and I had -- that's why I bought a home in a cul-de-sac -- what I
thought was a cul-de-sac and so now I'm up against the same thing again.
Meridian Planning & Zoning
June 19, 2008
Page 15 of 24
Moe: Are you saying -- is this your lot right there?
Longlin: Yes.
Moe: And your house faces right here?
Longlin: That's the front of my house and this is back.
Moe: I guess I'm not understanding when you speak of having to back out.
Longlin: This is the front of my house. Okay? Here. And, then, this is the back of my
house. And what happens -- Ron and Sharon live here. And it looks longer than what it
is. It's -- I mean this is just my house. I got a quick -- I got to turn here, I got people
turning here, and now if that's opened up, I'm going to have them coming around both
sides from there, too. And we are talking like a little tiny street, probably, from, what,
that desk to -- to the wall and it's -- and if that turns into a major thorough -- you know,
just trying to back out of the driveway is going to be a lot of fun. You know, I just -- it's
really frustrating, so -- because I moved there to have some peace. And I was also
wanting to request -- see if they could at least put some trees along there, too, so that
we can have some privacy on the other side of the berm. If that's -- that's what I'm
requesting, so -- and there is, there is little kids, all toddlers, all along Rattlesnake, this
comer here, they have three little rambunctious boys and there is kids over here, there
is tons of kids here, there is kids here -- and we are talking little kids. And I don't know
about you, but I know about high school kids and their cell phones and not paying
attention and going clear to the comer and not even looking. Somebody's going to get
hurt and its probably going to be somebody's little three year old or five year old.
Moe: Thank you very much. Is there anyone else who would like to speak? If no one
else wants to, please, applicant, come back up. Please.
Wiley: James Wiley again. To address some of the issues that they brought up, we do
have an existing preliminary plat approval. The accesses are on the existing
preliminary plat approval, which is still current, we are just trying to revise it by adding
an additional lot, essentially, creating the offices -- the small offices in the back. We
have dedicated right of way -- or we will dedicate -- excuse me. We will dedicate --
excuse me. We will dedicate additional right of way for Linder Road and for Chinden. A
hundred feet on Chinden and 48? Sixty? Sixty on Linder. So, it's a substantial roadway
dedication that presumably ACHD and/or ITD will expand the road at some point in the
future. I do not have their road improvement plan on me. The parcel of concern where
we were going to access into -- I'm not even going to try. Yeah. Right there. I don't
own that parcel. That's a condition put on by the city. I'm assuming the reason for the
condition is to limit the amount of accesses onto Linder. So, we are taking his access
and moving it through into -- into the access that's already approved. If Gertie was
terminated, as opposed to going through into our subdivision, I understand that's not
what the city normally wants, they want the connectivity. But if Gertie was terminated at
the property line, I would not want to have a cul-de-sac into our property. So, the cul-
Meridian Planning & Zoning
o •
June 19, 2008
Page 16 of 24
de -sac would have to move down or a hammerhead or something. Or that's what I
would request. On the other hand, we do have -- we have made a request for private
streets. I don't know if it's available for the Public Works Department or whomever. I
would -- no problem with putting in speed bumps, if that would help alleviate some of
the problems. I don't know if they are allowed on public streets, but if we are making
application for private streets, that would be fine with me. That's all I have.
Rohm: Thank you.
Wiley: Thank you.
Moe: There was discussion about additional trees.
Wiley: Well, whatever the landscaping requirement by the city, I'm sure we are -- it's
pretty stringent for trees and shrubs and whatnot. We are more than happy to place
them -- we want to create a buffer between the residential and the commercial. We
don't -- we don't want to have a problem down the road or at least mitigate the problem
as much as possible. If some trees and shrubs helps that out, then, that's what we will
do.
Moe: Okay.
O'Brien: I have one question, Mr. Chairman. On the buildings adjacent to the
residence, Larry, what control do you have, then, on windows and entrances, etcetera?
So, I assume that the entrances are going to be up in this area here, the front.
Wiley: That's the way we have currently designed them.
O'Brien: So, I assume, then, there are just going to be minimal windows along the back
side?
Wiley: Exactly.
O'Brien: Okay. And so I think the --
Wiley: Enough to get some light in, but we are not --
O'Brien: Right. But I can see that spreading out some trees along here to help that
privacy is probably all that it would really require.
Wiley: Uh-huh.
O'Brien: Okay. Thank you.
Marshall: Mr. Chair? I believe -- correct me if I'm wrong -- that all those were proposed
as one story --
Meridian Planning & Zoning
June 19, 2008
Page 17 of 24
Wiley: Yes.
Marshall: --office buildings? Thank you.
Moe: Thank you very much.
Wiley: Thank you.
Hood: Mr. Chair, if I may real quick, just to add onto what the applicant said in one of
the questions that Mr. Taylor had about redevelopment of that county parcel. I sit in on
all the pre -apps these days and I have not heard anyone come in wanting to redevelop
that -- that parcel these days. He's right, though; we are looking for some access
through this property, so there isn't another access point onto the arterial in the future
when that property does redevelop, if they redevelop. But, again, they are not even on
our radar screen for redevelopment and, again, the applicant's correct, we actually have
a requirement in C -G where C -G abuts residential, that there be a -- at maturity that the
wall -- that the plants create a screen wall, basically, to the residential. So, it won't be at
the time of planting, but with the combination of a fence and landscaping, it should
create a pretty good barrier, so --
Moe: Thank you very much. Mr. Rohm, do you have any comments?
Rohm: I think I already made mine.
Moe: Okay. Mr. Marshall? Well, at this point, then, can I get a motion for the Public
Hearing?
O'Brien: Mr. Chairman, I move to close Public Hearing PP 08-005. 1 believe it's also MI
08-003.
Baird: No.
O'Brien: No? Just that 05.
Rohm: Second.
Moe: It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on PP 08-005. All
those in favor say aye. Opposed? That motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Moe: Call for questions, discussion? I think that, quite frankly, what -- to me, with the
loss of the big box store out there, this, actually, is a much better plan than before, in my
opinion. The connectivity to the south I think is something that needs to happen, just for
the simple fact I don't want to see all the neighbors have to go out on Linder and come
Meridian Planning & Zoning
June 19, 2008
Page 18 of 24
around and come back into this property. So, my opinion is is that I think this project
was well thought up and I think it's a good fit for the comer.
Rohm: Mr. Chairman?
Moe: Yes, sir.
Rohm: I'd just like to add to that. In recognition of what the folks that have testified here
tonight, I certainly can understand where you're coming from and we -- we try very hard
to work with the community as a whole and I think that if there was anybody that had -- I
don't know, misled you, it would be the people that you buy from, because as a
development, this comer has always been slated to have their connectivity between that
property to -- that you're development's within, into that and it was never even
considered to not have that connectivity. So, I'm song that you were led to believe that
that would be a cul-de-sac that would not have any through traffic, but from a planning
group, we try very hard to minimize the ingress and egress onto the arterial roads and
this complies with that very well and end of comment.
Marshall: I personally, Mr. Chair, am very excited to see this change over what was
previous -- and I think it's vastly improved. I especially like the lower intensity
professional offices up against the residences, as opposed to a large grocery store or
something of much higher intensity. I also feel that the connectivity to the subdivision is
important, not only for -- to alleviate traffic from going to Linder, but it also -- for EMS
and fire, who require that connectivity, and this was planned from long ago and that is a
requirement of the city for many different reasons. So, I'm very much in favor of this
project.
Moe: Thank you. Mr. O'Brien, any comments?
O'Brien: Yes. Mr. Chair, I several thoughts. First of all, I agree with the connectivity. I
think it's important in looking at the layout of that subdivision, I think it's really important
-- it's going to serve mostly the people that live in that subdivision. As far as -- I
understand the risk of small children, as I raised some and grandchildren, too -- about
street concerns and that that's always a concern for a parent, to really keep on eye on
young kids, because, boy, they can be gone in a second. They can run outside, boom.
And that's a concern and I don't know how we can provide a lesser risk and not be able
to serve the rest of the community. As far as school goes and Rocky Mountain High --
oh, is it Rocky Mountain High? They are in a -- most of the people, children through
high school, are going to be in school mostly at the same time, except for the toddlers,
of course. But they will grow up -- they will grow and soon -- and will be in school
themselves and you will lessen the concern. The other thing I'm concerned with is I
would like to see the landscaping plan be provided to -- or approved by the people who
live behind these -- these businesses right here, maybe they can be involved in the
solution to provide a good buffer with the applicant to insure the maximum privacy under
the law and also I agree with having speed bumps -- some kind of vehicle or
mechanism there to insure that the speed is controlled. That's all I have.
Meridian Planning & Zoning
June 19, 2008
Page 19 of 24
Moe: Mr. Marshall, do you have something to say?
Marshall: I do have one last comment that having talked to the principal of Rocky
Mountain High, he made some comments about the fact that they are going to diligently
try to keep the students out of the local subdivisions, unless they -- unless they actually
live there and try to keep them directed out of those areas.
Moe: Ma'am, the Public Hearing has been closed. I'm song. I'm sorry the Public
Hearing has been closed. Mr. O'Brien, I do have one comment and I wanted -- Caleb
had discussed earlier the -- basically on the landscaping, you know, the ordinance --
you know, there are rules and regulations what they have got to conform to and over
time that landscaping will fill in as the buffer, so as far as having land -- being the
landowners and whatnot, you know, there is really no need, because it will have to
comply with the city requirements.
O'Brien: Okay. Thank you for clarifying that.
Moe: Okay. Any other comments, gentlemen? Is there a motion to be had?
O'Brien: Mr. Chairman, after considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I
move to recommend approval to the City Council of file number PP 08-005, as
presented in the staff report for the hearing date of June 19th, 2008, with no
modifications.
Marshall: Second.
Moe: It has been moved and seconded to approve PP 08-005. All those in favor say
aye. Opposed? That motion carries
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Hood: Mr. Chairman, just to clarify, I think you just slightly misspoke there. It is a
recommendation for approval. So, I thought I heard you say approved, but just a
clarification for the folks in the audience, this is a recommendation to the City Council,
so there will be another Public Hearing on this item as well. So, I just wanted to clarify
that.
Item 10: Public Hearing: CUP 08-012 Request for Conditional Use Permit
approval for a drive-thru establishment in a C -C zone within 300 feet of
another drive-thru facility for Silverstone Corporate Plaza by Sundance
Company — 3421 E. Overland Road:
Moe: Thank you. All right. At this time I'd like to open the Public Hearing CUP 08-012
for Silverstone Corporate Plaza and hear the staff report, please.
Meridian Planning & Zoning
June 19, 2008
Page 20 of 24
Parsons: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, the application before you
tonight is a request for a Conditional Use Permit for a drive-thru establishment within
300 feet of an existing drive-thru establishment. The site is -- the subject site is --
consists of three platted lots and approximately 6.2 acres within the Silverstone
Corporate Center Subdivision and is generally located at the southeast comer of East
Overload Road and South Eagle Road. North of the site, across Overland Road, is the
proposed commercial building that you guys acted on not too long ago, called Overland
Village. Currently it's zoned RUT, is requesting to be zoned C -G. South of the site is
Silverstone, zoned C -G. West of the site is Silverstone again, zoned C -C. And east of
the site is Silverstone Subdivision, zoned C -G. Here is an aerial view of the site. Right
now the applicant is proposing that drive-thru facility currently in this location. The
reason for the CUP request, again, is because the other drive-thru facility is right here,
which triggers that mechanism within that 300 foot requirement. I'd also like to point out
that there is an additional drive-thru located here and, then, that building as well. The
applicant is proposing to construct a 116,000 square foot multi-purpose building that
includes three drive-thru lanes and ATM services on the site. In addition, the applicant
is proposing covered parking in a covered walkway located on the south side of the site.
Again, you can kind of see the building footprint of the existing -- or the proposed
building. Here are the three drive-thru lanes that I mentioned. This is where the bank
will be located. On this map the site plan clearly shows the other drive-thru facility. This
is also a credit union. Here is where the covered parking is to be located, as I
mentioned, with the decorative walkway and a covered walkway that's connected to the
building and provide cover for the persons that use this facility. South -- this is the main
entrance of the building here. It's, again, decorated with seating, benches, hardscape.
There is hardscape located here. Each of the buildings have canopies over them to add
weather protection for patrons entering the building. The subject property is accessed
from a private access easement on the west side of the property that extends from East
Overland Road and runs south and southwest to South Eagle Road. The drive aisle
that runs parallel to East Overland Road connects to Silverstone Point parcel to the
east, which provides another full access point to East Overland Road. Two additional
driveways connect to South Silverstone Way and provide cross -access with the
surrounding developed parcels. So, to sum it up, this is a private easement here -- an
easement here that connects to Overland back to Eagle Road. This is that driveway
that parallels Overland Road and it provides access onto Overland here as well and,
then, there is additional driveways that stub to South Silverstone Way here that also add
to the circulation and connectivity to adjacent parcels. A landscape plan was submitted
with this application that complied with the landscape requirements of the UDC for
parking lots and drive aisles. The street buffer or landscaping along Overland Road and
South Silverstone Way was previously reviewed and approved with the final plat for the
subdivision. Staff reviewed this. It had no changes proposed, so everything looks good
at this point. The only thing I would point out is, again, here is where that covered
parking is located and you can -- it's hard to see the dashed line on this -- this site -- or
this landscape plan, but the covered parking will actually hang over into that landscape
-- those landscape planners, so it's going to make it real difficult for trees to be planted
there. So, staff hasn't really -- wasn't really concerned about that, because the
applicant's still proposing shrubs and those other plantings that will accent that. And
Meridian Planning & Zoning
June 19, 2008
Page 21 of 24
also another comment is these parking stalls still don't exceed the code requirement of
12 in a row. So, they still break up the parking pretty good and another thought was if
you come into the development down south Silverstone Way with that covered parking
and the canopy itself actually modulates, it varies in height, so it would kind of help
break up some of that parking in the rear of that building as well. So, that's what they
were proposing on the site. Here are the elevations that the applicant submitted for this
building. It will be a glaze or glass and, then, two different type of granite components.
Again, you can kind of see some of the modulation in the roof line, in the pop outs in the
buildings. You can see the darker accented granite with the lighter granite. I believe at
one time the applicant had discussed either green glass or blue glass as part of the
glazing for the building. I don't know where they are at on that. All the roof top
equipment is screened and enclosed in its own enclosure on top of the structure. So, it
shouldn't be an eye sore with the building. Staff -- after staff reviewed this, they find that
this building far exceeds what our design requirements have in the UDC. With that staff
is recommending approval of the CUP and with that I'll answer any questions.
Moe: Any questions?
O'Brien: One question, Mr. Chairman.
Moe: Mr. O'Brien.
O'Brien: Bill, how closely does the architecture match or whatever -- mismatch from the
other buildings surrounding that area? It seems like there is -- seems to be a theme. Is
this part of that theme that -- or does it need to be.
Parsons: I'll defer that question for the applicant. He's -- he's here tonight. He's more
familiar with that. But if I take a quick stab at it, I -- most of those buildings there are
stucco, stone facades on them, so it will vary somewhat from existing structures out
there.
O'Brien: Okay. Thank you.
Moe: I would make the statement that this one will far exceed the other items out there.
Would the applicant like to come forward, please.
Marshall: I had a question --
Moe: Oh, I'm sorry.
Marshall: -- of Bill real quick. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Bill, looking at this it appears there
is 116,112 -- or 121 square foot in the building. You were mentioning that the CUP was
simply required because of the drive-thru, but doesn't -- but doesn't the size of that in a
C -C zone also require a CUP?
Meridian Planning & Zoning
June 19, 2008
Page 22 of 24
Parsons: Mr. Chairman, Commissioner Marshall, no, the other reason for the design
review is because the building exceeds 60,000 square feet and that in design is -- at
staff level doesn't require a Public Hearing.
Marshall: Got you. I appreciate that. Thank you.
Parsons: You're welcome.
Larsen: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission, my name is
Cornell Larsen, I'm here tonight representing the Sundance Company and this project at
Silverstone. We have read through the staff report and we are okay with the conditions
that are shown in the staff report. There is one thing I need to do is -- is make you and
staff aware that we are working on the budget for this building and some of it may turn
into stucco if it's acceptable. But it might be the upper floor or the upper two floors, but
the granite will stay on as many areas as we can conceivably get them to work on.
Other than that, I would be happy to answer any questions for you. Excuse me. Mr.
Chairman, Commissioner O'Brien, the architecture is a little bit different on this building
than some of the other buildings, but it was actually intended to be -- this is a -- is more
the corporate building for the center. It will have several facilities within it that are
common conference rooms that will be available to everyone within the project. There
will be one large meeting room that will accommodate up to a hundred people. There
will be two smaller conference rooms, an executive board room, and, then, another
small board room that will be available to any of the tenants in the Silverstone business
center or corporate center to schedule times to meet within that facility. So, we are
trying to upgrade this building above what some of the other building have been out
there in the past trying to create a little better stature of building, I guess, or an upscale
building for the purpose of the whole park being able to use that facility as well and I
don't know whether we sent floor plans in or not with this particular application, but we --
basically, the ground floor is more of a multi-purpose floor. It has a catering facility in it,
as well as the meeting rooms that we had -- I have just mentioned.
Moe: Any questions?
O'Brien: I have no further questions.
Moe: Thank you very much.
Larsen: Thank you.
Moe: There is four other people out in the audience. No one's signed up. Is there
anyone else that would like to speak? Well, no one wants to come forward, I don't think
the applicant needs to come back up again just to -- not unless you just have something
else you want to say, so therefore --
O'Brien: Mr. Chairman?
Ns`
•
Meridian Planning & Zoning
June 19, 2008
Page 23 of 24
Moe: Mr. O'Brien.
O'Brien: I move to close the Public Hearing on CUP 08-012.
Marshall: Second.
Moe: It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on CUP 08-012. All
those in favor say aye. Opposed? That motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Moe: Mr. Rohm, any comments?
Rohm:. My only comment is I think that Silverstone development as a whole is a very
very nice addition to the City of Meridian and I think that this building will just enhance it
that much more.
Moe: I would agree.
Marshall: Mr. Rohm has echoed my same sentiments.
Moe: Okay.
O'Brien: I have one regret, Mr. Chairman, in that I have had to move my hunting zone
considerably south. The pheasants are no longer there anymore. But, yeah, I echo my
constituents; it's a good -- good building, good place to be. Thank you.
Moe: All right. Well, having said that --
Marshall: Mr. Chair, after considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move
to approve CUP 08-012 as presented during the hearing date of June 19th, 2008, with
no modifications.
Rohm: Second.
Moe: It's been moved and seconded to approve CUP 08-012 with no modifications. All
those in favor say aye. Opposed? That motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Moe: Caleb, you're on. You're not on my agenda, but you're on.
Hood: Mr. Chair, we can do this on or off the record, however you would like to do it. If
you guys want to close the hearing that would be fine, too.
Rohm: Mr. Chairman?
its ge r , z Lia t# x
try .
+x
x
a
t
{ q
* X
a
*
..t
t
rt i x
4
u
f a
p �
4
{ �v
el 411
,A"
.X`#a
� Y .�,§ bF Czq ✓e � ,i ., '..r...,w�'F= � 4' �� � T"� �"i3L"4.
Ate$
ea.�`-'
Meridian Planning & Zoning
June 19, 2008
Page 24 of 24
Moe: Yes, sir.
Rohm: I move we close the Public Hearing.
Marshall: Second.
Moe: That's adjourned.
Rohm: That, too.
Moe: Okay. All those in favor say aye. Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Moe: We are adjourned at 8:10.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:10 P.M.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS.)
... -,�I ME
a, •
ATTEST:y u
JAYCE
o�
DATE APPROVE_04#1
C Cmar
u
f a
p �
4
el 411
.X`#a
� Y .�,§ bF Czq ✓e � ,i ., '..r...,w�'F= � 4' �� � T"� �"i3L"4.
Ate$
ea.�`-'
�rY `1 Y^'k
S
4.
fi
1))1
na3 1p
mit
F-1
June 16, 2008
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING
APPLICANT
0
June 19, 2008
ITEM NO. 3-A
REQUEST Approve Minutes of June 5, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting:
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
OTHER:
Contacted:
Emailed:
COMMENTS
Date: Phone:
Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
•
June 115,
0
MERIDIkI P fNNING & ZONING MEETING June 19, 2008
APPLICANT Una Mas, LLC ITEM NO. 4
REQUEST Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat approval for 21 building lots on 12.62
acres for Una Mas - 3945 E. Ustick Road
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
COMMENTS
See Attached Staff Report
p 11V CA
Will
�i
r*
No Comment
See Attached Comments
See Attached Comments
OTHER: Affidavit of Sign Posting / No Comment by ITD
Contacted: AA p,,i- �p/1 S Date: Phone:
Emailed: �j/�G,r/j-�,p/�$ p��Mihe, jUrvX_Staff Initials: tjaiL
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
U20
June 18 AZ 08-007
MERIDIANING & ZONING MEETING June 19, 2008
APPLICANT LDR-II/DMG, LLC ITEM NO. S
REQUEST Public Healing - Annexation and Zoning of 4.79 acres from RUT to C -C
zoning district for Shops at Victory - 3210 S. Eagle Road
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER: '
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
COMMENTS
See Attache&Staff Report
No Comment
See Attached Comments
See Attached Comments
OTHER: Sign Posting / No Comment by ITD.
Contacted: -Flmo ra Date: Phone: �—
Emailed:-Ayb n,,,p Staff Initials: ry)4}-
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
�
t
U20
June 18 AZ 08-007
MERIDIANING & ZONING MEETING June 19, 2008
APPLICANT LDR-II/DMG, LLC ITEM NO. S
REQUEST Public Healing - Annexation and Zoning of 4.79 acres from RUT to C -C
zoning district for Shops at Victory - 3210 S. Eagle Road
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER: '
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
COMMENTS
See Attache&Staff Report
No Comment
See Attached Comments
See Attached Comments
OTHER: Sign Posting / No Comment by ITD.
Contacted: -Flmo ra Date: Phone: �—
Emailed:-Ayb n,,,p Staff Initials: ry)4}-
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
June 16, 2008 PP 08-006
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING June 19, 2008
APPLICANT LDR-II/DMG, LLC ITEM NO. 6
REQUEST Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat approval for 3 building lots on 3.68 acres
in a proposed C -C zoning district for Shops at Victory - 3210 S. Eagle Road
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK: See AZ Packet
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: b
CITY ATTORNEY /j a
CITY POLICE DEPT: I
CITY FIRE DEPT: J
14
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
OTHER:
Contacted: ar?� �eY, Date: '"7 Phone:
Emailed: Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
• 0
June 16, 2008 CUP 08-011
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING June 19, 2008
APPLICANT LDR-II/DMG, LLC ITEM NO.
REQUEST Public Hearing - Conditional Use Permit approval for a drive-thru
pharmacy in a proposed C -C zoning district within 300 feet of an existing residence
per UDC 11-4-3-11 for Shops at Victory - 3210 S. Eagle Road
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK: See AZ Packet
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
OTHER:
I
Contacted: Tan iLt4,/cL —/7Ao h sop i Date: &`/ Phone:
Emailed: ✓ Staff Initials: M44
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
June- 16, 2008
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING
June 19, 2008
CUP 08-013
APPLICANT Jerry Williams ITEM NO. 8
REQUEST Public Hearing - Conditional Use Permit for a personal service shop in the
O -T zoning district that does not meet the criteria of the Downtown Meridian Design
Guidelines for Mira Bella Salon - 1645 W. 1 st Street
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: See Request ttor Continuance 1199�
CITY ATTORNEY w
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT: 1
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT: No Comment
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: See Attached Comments
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: No Comment
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: See Attached Comments
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
OTHER: No Comment by ITD
Contacted: Date: Phone:
Emailed: Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
r ,
u
A
L
r
j
_-
t1:
•
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING June 19, 2008
APPLICANT James Wylie ITEM NO. 9
REQUEST Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat approval of 5 commercial lots and 1
other lot on 10 acres in a C -G zoning district for Knighthill Center -
SWC of W. Chinden Boulevard and N. Linder Road
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
COMMENTS
See Attached Staff Report
- V
V
No Comment
See Attached Comments
See Attached Comments
See Attached Comments
OTHER: See Affidavit of Sign Posting / Comments by ITD
Contacted: ��G�YL2$ �id^� Date:�p - LPhone: ----
Emailed: Qh(t dam Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
l
i
June 6, 2 8
MERIDI N PANNING & ZONING MEETING
APPLICANT Sundance Company
June 19, 2008
CUP 08-012
ITEM NO. 10
REQUEST Public Hearing - Conditional Use Permit approval for a drive-thru establishment in a
C -C zone within 300 feet of another drive-thru facility for Silverstone Corporate Plaza -
3421 E. Overland Road
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
COMMENTS
See Attached Staff Report
No Comment
See Attached Comments
No Comment
See Attached Comments
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
OTHER: Affidavit of Sign Posting / No Comment by ITD
Contacted: ? Date: 6 Phone:
Emailed: �j�r -�G�Sr9y�Gtf/`CnG C2v��®jiS.yp,�Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.