Environmental Assessment for CDBG Project Siteo~QpPtw~r°Fyo` U.S. Department of Housing and
m Urban Development
_ * * o Seattle Regional Office
'~ I I ~~_ 909 First Avenue, Suite 255
ysncevE`.oe Seattle, Washington, 98104
Environmental Assessment
for HUD-funded Proposals
Recommended format per 24 CFR 58.36, revised February 2004
[Previously recommended EA formats are obsolete].
Project Identification: Main Street Demolition Grantee Activity #: 04-2007-08
Preparers Sarah Wheeler, Assistant City Planner
Responsible Entity:
Month/Year:
City of Meridian
September 2008
1 of 8 HUD Seattle Region Environmental Office -- May 2005
Environmental Assessment
Responsible Entity: City of Meridian
[24 CFR 58.2(a)(7)]
Certifying Officer: Mayor Tammy De Weerd
[24 CFR 58.2(a)(2)]
Project Name: Main Street Demolition (Grantee Activity # 04-2007-08)
Project Location: 1535 N. Main St. Meridian, Idaho 83642
Estimated total project cost: $110,000
Grant Recipient: City of Meridian
[24 CFR 58.2(a)(5)]
Recipient Address: 33 East Idaho Ave., Meridian, ID 83642
Project Representative: Sarah Wheeler
Telephone Number: 208-884-5533
Conditions for Approval: (List all mitigation measures adopted by the responsible entity to eliminate
or minimize adverse environmental impacts. These conditions must be included in project contracts and
other relevant documents as requirements). [24 CFR 58.40(d), 40 CFR 1505.2(c)]
Minimum amounts of asbestos containing building materials were identified in the structure. The
City will ensure that the asbestos will be mitigated and abated prior to demolition in accordance
with federal, state and local statutes and regulations to reduce exposure to airborne asbestos
fibers. No other conditions for approval are necessary or adopted at this time because the City
finds that the project will not result in any significant environmental impact. Absent any significant
impact, the City,need not identify ways in which the project or external factors relating to the
project could be modified or conditioned in order to eliminate or minimize such impact.
FINDING: [58.40(8)]
X Finding of No Significant Impact
(The project will not result in a significant impact on the quality of the human environment)
Finding of Significant Impact
(The project may significantly affect the quality of the human environment)
Preparer Signature: ~,q,~'l.J V UVL(,{,~[,fJ
Name/Title/Agency: Sarah Wheeler, Assistant City Planner, City of Meridian
~~
RE Approving Official Signature: ~ Date: 9 IL
Name/Title/ Agency: Tammy De Weerd, Mayor, City Meridian
2 of 8 HUD Seatt]e Region Environments] Office --May 2005
Statement of Purpose and Need for the Proposal: [40 CFR 1508.9(b)]
The purpose of this project is to raze three dilapidated buildings from a parcel of land located in
downtown Meridian. The private owner does not have the funds necessary to conduct this project
and so the City will invest funds in helping him clear the hazards from the site.
Description of the Proposal: Include all contemplated actions which logically are either
geographically or functionally a composite part of the project, regardless of the source of funding.
[24 CFR 58.32, 40 CFR 1508.25]
The City intends to demolish and remove all structures on the site. Everything else onsite will
remain the same.
Existing Conditions and Trends: Describe the existing conditions of the project area and its
surroundings, and trends likely to continue in the absence of the project. [24 cFR 58.4o(a)]
The property is located in downtown Meridian within the designated urban renewal district. The
buildings on site are decaying and beyond repair. In September of 2006, the Building Official,
Plumbing Inspector, Electrical Inspector, Code Enforcement Officer, Public Works Development
Services Manager and Deputy Fire Chief inspected the premises and found that each an all of
these structures presented unsafe, unsanitary, deficient, hazardous, and/or illegal conditions,
including fire risks and distinct hazards to life and/or property due to numerous defects. The
owner was ordered to abate those conditions and attempted to do so by boarding up the
premises. Through numerous inspections the buildings were again found to remain unsecured
against entry or exposure. The City continued to receive complaints concerning the buildings and
activities occurring thereon. Without eliminating the buildings from the site, the City is concerned
that the degradation of the area will continue to hinder economic viability as well as public safety in
that area.
Statutory Checklist
[24CFR §58.5]
Record the determinations made regarding each listed statute, executive order or regulation. Provide
appropriate source documentation. [Note reviews or consultations completed as well as any applicable
permits or approvals obtained or required. Note dates of contact or page references]. Provide compliance
or consistency documentation. Attach additional material as appropriate. Note conditions, attenuation or
mitigation measures required.
Factors Determination and Compliance Documentation
Historic Preservation No historic properties will be affected. See Letter from State
[36 CFR 800] Historic Preservation Office dated May 6, 2008 in 1535 N. Main
F[le.
Floodplain Management Activity is not located within a floodpiain. See FEMA flood map
[24 CFR 55; Executive Order 11988] entitled City of Meridian #160180, map panel number 232,
dated Feb. 19, 2003.
Wetlands Protection Project is not located in a wetland. See
[Executive Order 11990] htto://wetlandsfws.er.uscas.aov. See also letter from Kyle
Radek, Assistant City Engineer, dated August 20, 2008 in 1535
N. Main File.
Coastal Zone CZMA is not applicable; there are no coastal areas in Meridian,
Management Act Idaho. See
[sections 3o~(c),(d)] http://coastalmanagement.noaa.gov/mystate/welcome.html.
Sole Source Aquifers SDWA is not applicable; there are no sole source aquifers in
[40 CFR 149] Meridian, Idaho. See map contained in Common Source F[le,
htt ://e a. ov/oar/oa s/ reenbk/ancl.html, and
3 of 8 HUD Seatt]e Region Environments] Office -- May 2005
http://cfpu b.epa.QOV/safewater/sourcewater/sourcewater.cfm?a
ction=SSA.
Endangered Species Act ESA is not applicable; no endangered, threatened, or proposed
[50 CFR 402] species or designated critical habitat will be affected by the
project. See also letter from Scott Reinecker, Idaho Fish and
Game, dated Ma 7, 2008 in 1535 N. Main File
W[Id and Scenic WSRA is not applicable; there are no rivers designated as Wild
Rivers Act and Scenic Rivers in Meridian, Idaho. See list contained in
[Sections 7 (b), (c)] Common Source File and
htt ://www/rivers. ov/wildriverslist.htmi.
Air Quality CAA is not applicable; the project is not located in a non-
[Clean Air Act, sectlons 176 (c) attainment area. See EPA nonattainment area map
and (d), and 40 CFR 6, 51, 93] (http://epa.gov/oar/oapps/areenbk/ancl.html) in Common
Source File at. See also Letter from DEQ dated June 3, 2008
in 1535 N. Main File.
Farmland Protection Policy FPPA is inapplicable; the project is in an area zoned
Act [7 CFR 658] commercial. See planning and zoning map in 1535 N. Main
file.
Environmental Justice The project will not adversely affect the health or environment
[Executive Order 12898] of minority or low-income populations. The larger and
neighboring communities have been provided with opportunity
to review and comment on this project in accordance with the
Citizen Participation Pian, which emphasizes notice and
hearin o portunities for minori and low-income o ulations.
HUD Environmental Standards Determination and Comuliance Documentation
Noise Abatement and This project will not create noise pollution or exposure to noise.
Control [24 CFR 51 B] Noise from project demolition activities is temporary and separated
from e~asting residential development.
Toxic/Hazardous/Radioactive Minimum amounts of asbestos containing building materials
Materials, Contamination, were identified in the structures and will be mitigated and
Chemicals or Gases abated prior to demolition (see Terracon Asbestos Survey
[24 CFR 58.5(1)(2)] Report dated Sept. 15, 2008, located in 1535 N. Main File).No
other toxic, hazardous, or radioactive substances are identified
on the project site. See Common Source File,
http://www.epa.QOV/enviro/emef/ .See also letter from Eileen
Zahara, EPA region X dated June 13, 2008, located in 1535 N.
Main File.
Siting of HUD-Assisted No hazardous operations are located near the project. See
Projects near Hazardous Common Source File (map available at
OperatlOnS [24 CFR 51 C] http://www.epa.QOV/enviro/emefn. See also letter from Eileen
Zahara, EPA Region X, dated June 13, 2008 in 1535 N. Main
File. See also DEQ letter dated June 3, 2008 in 1535 N. Main
File.
Airport Clear Zones and No FAA-designated civilian airports are located within 3,000
Accident Potential Zones feet or military airfields within 2'/ miles of the project site. See
[24 CFR 51 D] Designafed Primary and Commercial Service Airports in Idaho
and Oregon in Common Source File.
4 of 8 HUD Seatt]e Region Environmental Office -- May 2005
Environmental Assessment Checklist
[Environmental Review Guide HUD CPD 782, 24 CFR 58.40; Ref. 40 CFR 1508.8 8~150S.27j
Evaluate the significance of the effects of the proposal on the character, features and resources of the
project area. Enter relevant base data and verfiable source documentation to support the finding. Then
enter the appropriate impact code from the following list to make a determination of impact Impact Codes:
(1) - No impact anticipated; (2) -Potentially beneficial; (3) -Potentially adverse; (4) -Requires mtgation;
(5) -Requires project modification. Note names, dates of contact, telephone numbers and page
references. Attach additional material as appropriate. Note conditions or mitigation measures required.
Land Development Code Source or Documentation
Conformance with 2 This project conforms with Meridian Comprehensive Plan and
Comprehensive Plans Zoning designation. Site is zoned for commercial use. Removing
and Zoning dilapidated buildings may make way for new commercial
develo ment. See Zonin ma in Common Source File.
Compatibility and 2 This project is compatible with the urban environment. Site is in a
Urban Impact commercial district and the demolition of these old buildings will
encourage commercial growth in downtown Meridian. See Zoning
map in Common Source File.
Slope 1 This project will not affect slope of property. See letter by Bruce
Freckleton, Meridian Development Service Manager, dated July
1, 2008 in 1535 N. Main File.
Erosion 1 This project will not cause erosion. See letter by Bruce
Freckleton, Meridian Development Service Manager, dated July
1, 2008 in 1535 N. Main File.
Soil Suitability 1 This project will not affect soil quality since the City is only
removing the buildings and not constructing anything on site.
Hazards and Nuisances 1 This project will neither create nor be affected by hazardous
including Site Safety operations . See htta://www.eaa.aov/enviro/emef/ in Common
Source File. See also letter by Eileen Zahara, EPA Region X,
dated June 3, 2008 in 1535 N. Main File. See also DEQ letter
dated June 3, 2008 in 1535 N. Main File.
Energy Consumption 1 This project will not affect energy consumption.
Noise -Contribution to
Community Noise Levels 1 This project will not generate a substantial increase in traffic.
Noise from project demolition activities is temporary and
se arated from existin residential develo ment.
Air Quality 1 This project is not located in anon-attainment area. See EPA
Effects of Ambient Air Quality on nonattainment area map in Common Source File (available at
Project and Contribution to htto://www.eaa.caov). See also currently designated nonattainment
Community Pollution Levels areas in Common Source File (available at
htto://epa.aov/oar/oaaps/greenbk/ancl.html). DEQ letter dated
June 3, 2008 in 1535 N. Main File.
Environmental Design 2 Environmental design is not applicable to this project.
Visual Quality -Coherence,
Diversity, Compatible Use and
Scale
Socioeconomic Code Source or Documentation
Demographic Character Changes 1 The project is consistent with surrounding land uses and will
not effect change in demographic or neighborhood
character.
Displacement 1 No dis lacement will occur; buildin shave been vacant for
5 of 8 HUD Seattle Region Environmental Office -May 2005
over two years.
and Income Patterns 2 It is hoped that future development on the project site will
increase economic opportunities in Meridian. However, this
project will not directly affect employment and income
Community Facilities
and Services Code Source or Documentation
Educational Facilities 1 Thls ro'ect will introduce no new students into the area.
Commercial Facilities 1 This ro ect will not affect commercial facilities.
Health Care 1 This ro'ect will not affect health care services.
Social Services 1 This ro ect will not affect social services.
Solid Waste 1 This ro'ect will not affect solid waste issues.
Waste Water 1 This ro'ect will not affect waste water issues.
Storm Water 1 This project may improve surface drainage. See letter by Kyle
Radek, Assistant City Engineer, dated August 20, 2008 in 1535
N. Main folder.
Water Su I 1 This ro'ect will not affect water su I .
Public Safety
- Police 2 This project will improve public safety, as removing buildings from
the premises will make it easier for police to patrol.
- Fire 2 This project will improve public safety, as removing buildings from
the premises will reduce current fire hazards (Joe Silva, Fire
Inspector, 8841234). See also building inspection report in 1535
N. Main File.
- Emergency Medical 1 This project will not affect the emergency medical aspect of public
safety.
Open Space and Recreation
-Open Space 1 This project will not affect open space.
- Recreation 1 This project will not affect recreation.
- Cultural Facilities 1 This ro'ect will not affect cultural facilities.
Transportation 1 This project will not affect transportation.
Natural Features Source or Documentation
Water Resources 1 This project will not affect water resources. See letter by Kyle
Radek, Assistant City Engineer, dated August 20, 2008 in 1535
N. Main folder.
Surface Water 1 This project will not affect surface water. See letter by Kyle
Radek, Assistant City Engineer, dated August 20, 2008 in 1535
N. Main folder.
Unique Natural Features and 1 This project will not affect any unique natural features or
Agricultural Lands agricultural lands. The properly is located in the downtown
Meridian core and is sun-ounded by commercial properties. There
is no agricultural land within its vicinity. See planning and zoning
map in Common Source Documentation. Sarah Wheeler,
Assistant City Planner, 208-8845533.
vegetation and Wildlife 1 This project will not affect any endangered, threatened, or
proposed species or designated critical habitat. See also
letter from Scott Reinecker, Idaho Fish and Game, dated
Ma 7, 2008 in 1535 N. Main File
6 of 8 H[TD Seattle Region Environmental Office -- May 2005
Other Factors Source or Documentation
Flood Disaster Protection Act i FDPA is not applicable; the project site is not located within
[Flood Insurance] a floodplain. See FEMA flood map entitled City of Meridian
[§58.6(a)] #160180, map panel number 232, date Feb. 19, 2003. See
also letter by Kyle Radek, Assistant City Engineer, dated August
20, 2008 in 1535 N. Main folder.
Coastal Barrier Resources Act/ 1 CBRA/CBIA are not applicable; there are no coastal areas
Coastal Barrier Improvement Act in Meridian, Idaho.
58.6 c
Airport Runway Clear Zone or i No FAA designated civilian airports are located within 3000
Clear Zone Disclosure feet or military airfields within 2'/z miles of the project site.
[§58.6(d)] See Designated Primary and Commercial Service Airports
in Idaho and Ore on in Common Source File.
Other Factors None.
Summary of Findings and Conclusions
ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION
AlternatiVeS and PrOj@Ct MOdifICat1011S C011s1d@red [24 CFR 58.40(e), Ref. 40 CFR 1508.9]
(Identify other reasonable courses of action that were considered and not selected, such as other sites,
design modifications, or other uses of the subject site. Describe the benefits and adverse impacts to the
human environment'of each altemative and the reasons for rejecting it.)
The project and removal of the slum and blight is specific to the site located at 1535 N. Main,
therefore no other sites were considered. The slum and blight and public safety issues can only
be eliminated by razing the buildings.
No Action Alternative [24 cFR 58.4o(e)]
(Discuss the benefits and adverse impacts to the human environment of not implementing the preferred
altemative).
The alternative of no action was considered but rejected because the buildings are too
deteriorated to rehabilitate and boarding them up has not abated the aesthetic blight, hazardous
conditions or public safety hazards perpetuated by the dilapidated buildings.
MltlgatlOn Measures ReCOmmended [24 CFR 58.40(d), 40 CFR 1508.20]
(Recommend feasible ways in which the proposal or its external factors should be modified in order to
minimize adverse environmental impacts and restore or enhance environmental quality.)
Minimum amounts of asbestos containing building materials were identified in the structures. Due
to this factor, the City will ensure that the asbestos will be mitigated and abated prior to demolition
in accordance with federal, state and local statutes and regulations. No other mitigation measures
are necessary or adopted at this time because the City finds that the project will not result in any
significant environmental impact. Absent any significant impact, the City need not identify ways in
which it should: avoid any impact by not completing the project or any part of the project; minimize
any impact by limiting the project or its implementation; rectify any impact through repair,
rehabilitation, or restoration; reduce or eliminate any impact over the lifetime of the project; or
compensate for any impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments.
7 of 8 HUD Seatt]e Region Environmental Office -May 2005
Additional Studies Performed
(Attach studies or summaries)
Level One Environmental Assessment by Terracon Consultants Inc.
List of Sources, Agencies and Persons Consulted [4o CFR 15os.9(b)]
Bruce Freckleton, City of Meridian Development Services Manager
City of Meridian Planning Department
Emily Kane, Ciiy of Meridian Deputy City Attorney
Environmental Protection Agency, Idaho Operations Office
Environmental Protecton Agency -Sole Source Aquifer Map
FEMA flood plain map
Idaho Department of Environmental Quality
Idaho Department of Fish and Game
Joe Silva, Deputy Chief of Fire Prevention
Kyle Radek, Assistant City Engineer
National Park Service,
National Wetlands Inventory's digital wetlands mapper tool
State Historic Preservation Office
Terracon Consultants Inc.
8 of 8 HUD Seattle Region Environmental Office -- May 2005
ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT
Crest Fallen Apartments
1535 North Main Street
Meridian, Idaho
Terracon Project No. 62087010
September 15, 2008
Prepared for:
CITY OF MERIDIAN
Meridian, Idaho
Prepared by:
TERRACON CONSULTANTS, INC.
Boise, Idaho
September 15, 2008
Mr. Keith Watts
City of Meridian
33 East Idaho Street
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Re: Asbestos Survey
Crest Fallen Apartments
1535 North Main Street
Meridian, Idaho
Terracon Protect No, 62087010
Oear Mr. Watts:
1r~rr~con
Consulting Engineers 8 Scientists
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
11849 West Executive Drive, Suite G
Boise, Idaho 83713
Phone 208.323.9520
Fax 208.323.9592
www.tercacron.com
The purpose of this report is to present the results of an asbestos survey performed on
September 4, 20i;}8 at the above referenced site in Meridian, Idaho. This survey was
conducted in general accordance With our propose! dated August 11, 2008. We understand
that this survey was requested due to the planned demolition of the structures.
Friable and non-friable asbestos-containing materials were idenfif'ied. Please refer to the
attached report for details.
Terracon Consultants, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to provide this service to the City of
Meridian. if you have any questions regarding this report please contact the undersigned at
208-323-9520.
Sincerely,
TERRACON CONSULTANTS, INC.
~~ ~~ ~
Kurt L. Priebe, P.G.
Environmental Services Manager
AHERA Inspector
r
Gary A. anson, CI ,
EHS Group Manager
AHERA Inspector
iQ.P:kj/N:IPROJECTS12008~Z087010iReport162087010 Creat Fallen Apartments ACM Report (Fina~.doc
Attachments
Copies To: Addressee (2)
Delivering Success for Clients and Employees Since 196$
More Than 96 Offices Nationwide
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Letter of Transmittal..........
Terracon
Page No.
................................................... i
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Project Objective ....................................................................................................... 1
2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................. 1
3.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY ......................................................................................................... 2
3.1 Visual Assessment .................................................................................................... 2
3.2 Physical Assessment ................................................................................................ 2
3.3 Sample Collection ..................................................................................................... 2
3.4 Sample Analysis ........................................................................................................ 2
4.0 ASBESTOS REGULATORY OVERVIEW .......................................................................... 3
5.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................ 3
6.0 GENERAL COMMENTS ..................................................................................................... 4
APPENDIX A
Asbestos Survey Sample Summary
APPENDIX B
Confirmed Asbestos-Containing Materials
APPENDIX C
Asbestos Analytical Laboratory Data
TERRACON
ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT
Crest Fallen Apartments
1535 North Main Street
Meridian, Idaho
Terracon Project No. 62087010
September 15, 2008
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) conducted an asbestos survey of the Crest Fallen
Apartments buildings located at 1535 North Main Street in Meridian, Idaho. The survey was
conducted on September 4, 2008 by an AHERA-accredited asbestos inspector in general
accordance with Terracon Proposal No. 62082119 dated August 11, 2008. Interior and
exterior building components were surveyed and homogeneous areas of suspect asbestos-
containing materials (ACM) were visually identified. The three buildings were unoccupied at
the time of the survey. Significant amounts of trash and debris were located within the
structures. Although reasonable effort was made to survey accessible suspect materials,
additional suspect but un-sampled materials could be located in walls, in voids or in other
concealed areas. Suspect ACM samples were collected in general accordance with the
sampling protocols outlined in EPA regulation 40 CFR 763 (Asbestos Hazard Emergency
Response Act, AHERA). Samples were delivered to an accredited laboratory for analysis by
polarized light microscopy.
1.1 Project Objective
We understand this asbestos survey was requested due to the planned demolition of the
buildings. EPA regulation 40 CFR 61, Subpart M, National Emission Standards for Hazardous
Air Pollutants (NESHAP), prohibits the release of asbestos fibers to the atmosphere during
renovation or demolition activities. The asbestos NESHAP requires that potentially regulated
asbestos-containing building materials be identified, classified and quantified prior to planned
disturbances or demolition activities.
2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION
The three buildings at the site are single-story wood-framed structures with wood subfloors
over concrete foundations. The buildings at the site consisted of: a residential structure
previously used as an office/retail copy center; afive-unit apartment building; and athree-
unit apartment building. The majority of the building exterior walls are covered with wood
siding. Portions of the office building exterior are finished with stucco. The pitched roofs are
covered with asphaltic shingles over a wood shingle roof. The interior walls and ceilings
consisted of a combination of gypsum wallboard, lath and plaster, and gypsum wallboard
with plaster, finished with spray-on surface texture with a painted finish. The office area
1
Crest Fallen Apartments Terracon
Terracon Project No. 62087010
September 15, 2008
floors were finished with carpet. Apartment unit floor finishes were variable and consisted of
wood floor, carpet, ceramic tile, vinyl sheet flooring, and vinyl floor tile. According to
information provided by the Ada County Assessors Office website, the buildings were
constructed in 1935.
3.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY
The survey was conducted by Kurt Priebe, an AHERA-accredited asbestos inspector. The
survey was conducted in general accordance with the sample collection protocols established
in EPA regulation 40 CFR 763, the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA). A
summary of survey activities is provided below.
3.1 Visual Assessment
Our survey activities began with visual observation of the interior and exterior of the building to
identify homogeneous areas of suspect ACM. A homogeneous area consists of building
materials that appear similar throughout in terms of color, texture and date of application.
Interior assessment was conducted throughout visually accessible areas of the building.
Building materials identified as concrete, glass, wood, masonry, metal or rubber were not
considered suspect ACM.
3.2 Physical Assessment
A physical assessment of each homogeneous area of suspect ACM was conducted to assess
the friability and condition of the materials. A friable material is defined by the EPA as a
material which can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry.
Friability was assessed by physically touching suspect materials.
3.3 Sample Collection
Based on results of the visual observation, bulk samples of suspect ACM were collected in
general accordance with AHERA sampling protocols. Random samples of suspect materials
were collected in each homogeneous area. Bulk samples were collected using wet methods
as applicable to reduce the potential for fiber release. Samples were placed in sealable
containers and labeled with unique sample numbers using an indelible marker.
Sixty-two (62) bulk samples were collected from 26 homogeneous areas of suspect ACM. A
summary of suspect ACM samples collected during the survey is included as Appendix A.
3.4 Sample Analysis
2
Crest Fallen Apartrnents Terracon
Terracon Project No. 62087010
September 15, 2008
Bulk samples were submitted under chain of custody to EMC Labs, Inc. of Phoenix, Arizona
for analysis by polarized light microscopy with dispersion staining techniques per EPA
methodology (40 CFR 763, Subpart F). The percentage of asbestos, where applicable, was
determined by microscopical visual estimation. EMC Labs, Inc. is accredited under the
National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP Accreditation No. 101926-0).
4.0 ASBESTOS REGULATORY OVERVIEW
The asbestos NESHAP (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M) regulates asbestos fiber emissions and
asbestos waste disposal practices. It also requires the identification and classification of
existing building materials prior to demolition or renovation activity. Under NESHAP,
asbestos-containing building materials are classified as either friable, Category Inon-friable or
Category II non-friable ACM. Friable materials are those that, when dry, may be crumbled,
pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Category Inon-friable ACM includes
packings, gaskets, resilient floor coverings and asphalt roofing products containing more than
1 % asbestos. Category I I non-friable ACM are any materials other than Category I materials
that contain more than 1 % asbestos.
Friable ACM, Category I and Category II non-friable ACM which is in poor condition and has
become friable or which will be subjected to drilling, sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading and
which could be crushed or pulverized during anticipated renovation or demolition activities are
considered regulated ACM (RACM).
The OSHA Asbestos standard for construction (29 CFR 1926.1101) regulates workplace
exposure to asbestos. The OSHA standard requires that employee exposure to airborne
asbestos fibers be maintained below 0.1 asbestos fibers per cubic centimeter of air (0.1 f/cc).
The OSHA standard classifies construction and maintenance activities which could disturb
ACM, and specifies work practices and precautions which employers must follow when
engaging in each class of regulated work. States which administer their own federally-
approved state OSHA programs may require additional precautions.
5.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
ASBESTOS SURVEY
Laboratory analysis confirmed the presence of friable and non-friable asbestos-containing
materials. A summary of the classification and condition of identified ACM are presented in
Appendix A and Appendix B. Laboratory analytical reports are included in Appendix C.
The spray-on texture located on the living room wall of unit 1, and the bedroom wall and living
room ceiling of unit 6 was determined to be positive for asbestos by laboratory analysis. Other
3
Crest Fallen Apartrnents Terracon
Terracon Project No. 62087010
September 15, 2008
samples of this material from other areas of the structures tested negative for asbestos. The
confirmed asbestos-containing spray-on texture is considered friable ACM and was observed
in generally good condition at the time of sampling. Areas of the wall and ceiling systems have
been damaged due to vandalism or neglect.
The vinyl sheet flooring (yellow and cream mosaic) located in the kitchen area of unit 6 was
determined to be positive for asbestos by laboratory analysis. The confirmed asbestos-
containing VSFs have afelt/paper backing which, when disturbed, can release asbestos
fibers. Therefore, the confirmed asbestos-containing VSF materials are considered friable
ACM that was in generally poor condition at the time of sampling.
The vinyl wall covering (tan and brown) located in the shower and bathroom area of unit 3 was
determined to be positive for asbestos by laboratory analysis. The confirmed asbestos-
containing vinyl wall covering material has afelt/paper backing which, when disturbed, can
release asbestos fibers. Therefore, the confirmed asbestos-containing vinyl wall covering
materials are considered friable ACM that was in generally poor condition at the time of
sampling.
The mastic materials located below the VSF in unit 6 and the vinyl wall covering materials in
unit 3 were determined positive for asbestos by laboratory analysis. The confirmed asbestos-
containing mastic is considered anon-friable ACM and was observed in generally good
condition at the time of sampling.
The tables in Appendix A contain a complete listing of these materials and there location.
6.0 GENERAL COMMENTS
This asbestos survey was conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill
ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions
in the same locale. The results, findings, conclusions and recommendations expressed in this
report are based on conditions observed during our survey of the building. The information
contained in this report is relevant to the date on which this survey was performed, and should
not be relied upon to represent conditions at a later date. This report has been prepared on
behalf of and exclusively for use by the City of Meridian for specific application to their project
as discussed. This report is not a bidding document. Contractors or consultants reviewing this
report must draw their own conclusions regarding further investigation or remediation deemed
necessary. Terracon does not warrant the work of regulatory agencies, laboratories or other
third parties supplying information which may have been used in the preparation of this report.
No warranty, express or implied is made.
4
APPENDIX A
ASBESTOS SURVEY SUMMARY
APPENDIX A
ASBESTOS SURVEY SUMMARY
CREST FALLEN APARTMENTS
1535 North Main Street
MERIDIAN, IDAHO
Sample
No. Descri tion Unit Floor Sam le Location Lab Result
CF-1 SWS 1 1 Living room, west All Layers ND
wall
CF-2 Asphaltic shingle (red and white Roof Roof Roof above Unit 1 ND
ranules, to la er
CF-3 Asphaltic shingle (black and white Roof Roof Roof above Unit 1 ND
granules, bottom layer, over
wood
CF-4 Asphaltic shingle (red and white Roof Roof Roof above Unit 5 ND
ranules, to la er
CF-5 Asphaltic shingle (black and white Roof Roof Roof above Unit 5 ND
granules, bottom layer, over
wood)
CF-6 Asphaltic shingle (pink and white Roof Roof Roof above Unit 6 ND
ranules, over wood
CF-7 Asphaltic shingle (pink and white Roof Roof Roof above Unit 8 ND
ranules, over wood
CF-8 SWS 1 1 Living room, central sheetrock - ND
wall Texture - 3%
Ch sotile
CF-9 Insulation (brown) with paper 1 1 Utility room off Unit ND
backin black 1
CF-10 Wall taster (lath and taster wall 2 1 Bathroom wall ND
CF-11 9° x 9° vin I floor the and mastic 2 1 Livin room All La ers ND
CF-12 SWS 2 1 Ceilin All La ers ND
CF-13 Vinyl wall cover, (tan and brown) 3 1 Shower wall Vinyl -15
with mastic (yellow) Chrysotile
Mastic - 3%
Ch sotile
CF-14 Vinyl wall cover, (tan and brown) 3 1 Bathroom wall Vinyl -15
with mastic (yellow) Chrysolite
Mastic - 4%
Ch sotile
CF-15 SWS 3 1 Bathroom wall All La ers ND
CF-16 Wall plaster (lath and plaster, 3 1 Bathroom wall All Layers ND
under SWS
CF-17 SWS 3 1 Livin room All La ers ND
CF-18 Plaster 4 1 Chimne ND
CF-19 Wall system (leveling compound 4 1 Living room wall All Layers ND
over taster over sheetrock
CF-20 Wall system (leveling compound 4 1 Living room ceiling All Layers ND
over taster over sheetrock
CF-21 Insulation (brown) with paper 4 1 Living room ceiling ND
backin brown
CF-22 12" x 12" vinyl floor the (gray), 5 1 Kitchen ND
and mastic ( ellow
CF-23 12" x 12" vinyl floor the (gray), 5 1 Kitchen ND
and mastic ( ellow
CF-24 Wall system (leveling compound 5 1 Living room wall All Layers ND
over taster over sheetrock
CF-25 Wall system (leveling compound 5 1 Living room ceiling All Layers ND
over taster over sheetrock
CF-26 Insulation, blown in brown Office 1 Ceiling ND
CF-27 1' x 2' Ceilin the nail on Office 1 Ceiling ND
CF-28 4' x 8' Ceilin anel nail on Office 1 Ceilin ND
CF-29 Wall system (leveling compound Office 1 Ceiling ND
over taster over sheetrock
CF-30 SWS Office 1 Ceilin ,back room All La ers ND
CF-31 SWS Office 1 Ceilin ,back room All La ers ND
CF-32 SWS Office 1 Ceilin ,back room All La ers ND
CF-33 Leveling compound and plaster Office 1 F~cterior, west side ND
of buildin
CF-34 Asphaltic shingle (black and gray Office Roof Roof above back ND
ranules, to la er door
CF-35 Asphaltic shingle (brown Office Roof Roof above back ND
granules, bottom layer, over door
wood
CF-36 Asphaltic shingle (multicolor Office Roof Roof on SW portion ND
ranules, over wood of office
CF-37 VSF (yellow and cream mosaic) 6 1 Kitchen VSF (yellow
with mastic (yellow), over VSF and cream) -
(brown) and mastic 15%Chrysotile
Mastic (yellow)
- 5%Chrysotile
VSF (brown) ND
Mastic ra ND
CF-38 VSF (yellow and cream mosaic) 6 1 Kitchen VSF (yellow
with mastic (yellow), over VSF and cream) -
(brown) and mastic 15%Chrysotile
Mastic (yellow)
- 3%Chrysotile
VSF (brown) ND
Mastic ra ND
CF-39 VSF (yellow and cream mosaic) 6 1 Kitchen VSF (yellow
with mastic (yellow), over VSF and cream) -
(brown) and mastic 15%Chrysotile
Mastic (yellow)
- 4%Chrysotile
VSF (brown) ND
Mastic ra ND
CF-40 SWS 6 1 Living room ceiling sheetrock - ND
Texture - 3%
Ch sotile
CF-41 Insulation brown with a er 6 1 Livin room Ceilin ND
backin black
CF~2 SWS 6 1 Bedroom wall Sheetrock - ND
Texture - 2%
Ch sotile
CF-43 SWS 6 1 Livin room wall ND
CF-44 VSF (cream with pink and blue)
with mastic ( ellow) 6 1 Bathroom ND
CF~5 VSF (cream with pink and blue)
with mastic ellow 6 1 Bathroom ND
CF~6 Remnant mastic tan 6 1 Bathroom wall ND
CF-47 Fake brick sidin 6 1 Exterior of Unit 6 ND
CF~48 VSF (brown, wood pattern) with
mastic ellow 7 1 Kitchen ND
CF~49 VSF (brown, wood pattern) with
mastic ellow 7 1 Kitchen ND
CF-50 VSF (brown, wood pattern) with
mastic ellow 7 1 Kitchen ND
CF-51 SWS 7 1 Livin room All La ers ND
CF-52 SWS 7 1 Bedroom All La ers ND
CF-53 Insulation ellow 7 1 Bathroom wall ND
CF-54 VSF (tan squares) with mastic
ellow 7 1 Bathroom ND
CF-55 VSF (tan squares) with mastic
ellow 7 1 Bathroom ND
CF-56 VSF (tan squares) with mastic
ellow 7 1 Bathroom ND
CF-57 Tarpaper (black) 7 1 Behind sheetrock
wall ND
CF-58 Insulation ra ,blown in 8 1 Ceilin ND
CF-59 Texture on I ood wall 8 1 Livin room wall ND
CF-60 Fake brick sidin 7 1 Exterior of Unit 7 ND
CF-61 Asphaltic shingles (white
ranules and to a er black Shed Roof Roof of west shed ND
CF-62 Asphaltic shingles (white
granules) Shed Roof Roof of shed #3 ND
VSF = Vinyl sheet flooring
SWS =Sheetrock wall system
ND = no asbestos detected
CONFIRMED ASBESTOS-CONTAINING
MATERIALS
APPENDIX B
CONFIRMED ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS
CREST FALLEN APARTMENTS
1535 North Main Street
MERIDIAN, IDAHO
Sample Description Material Location Percent/Type NESHAP Condition
No Asbestos Classlflcatlon
. Sample Location
°o
CF-8 Texture of the 1 1 Living room wall 3%Chrysotile Friable Good
SWS
CF-13 Vinyl wall cover, Shower area wall Vinyl -15 % Non-Friable" Damaged
(tan and brown)
3
1 Chrysotile
with mastic Mastic - 3%
(yellow) Ch sotile
CF-14 Vinyl wall cover, Bathroom area wall Vinyl -15 % Non-Friable'" Damaged
(tan and brown) 3 1 Chrysotile
with mastic Mastic - 4%
(yellow) Ch sotile
CF-37 VSF (yellow and Kitchen VSF (yellow Non-Friable* Damaged
cream mosaic) and cream) -
with mastic
6
1 15%Chrysotile
(yellow) Mastic (yellow)
- 5%
Ch sotile
CF-38 VSF (yellow and Kitchen VSF (yellow Non-Friable" Damaged
cream mosaic) and cream) -
with mastic
6
1 15%Chrysotile
(yellow) Mastic (yellow)
- 3%
Ch sotile
CF-39 VSF (yellow and Kitchen VSF (yellow Non-Friable'" Damaged
cream mosaic) and cream) -
with mastic
6
1 15%Chrysotile
(yellow) Mastic (yellow)
- 4%
Ch sotile
CF-40 Texture of the 6 1 Living room ceiling 3%•Chrysotile Friable Good
SWS
CF-42 Texture of the ti 1 Bedroom wall 2%Chrysotile Friable Good
SWS
"The backing on the vinyl sheet flooring would render this material friable during renovation or demolition.
APPENDIX C
Asbestos Analytical Laboratory Data
EMC LABS, '~V. Laboratory Report
9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 0068137
Phone: 500-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 -Fag: (480) 893-1726
Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Licht Microscopy
NVLAP#101926-0
Client: TERRACON, INC. Job# / P.O. #: 62087010
Address: 11849 W. EXECUTIVE DR, STE G Date Received: 09/05/2008
BOISE ID 83 713 Date Analyzed: 09/09/2008
Collected: 09/04/2008 Date Reported: 09/09/2008
Project Name/ CREST FALLEN APTS EPA Method: EPA 600/M4-82-020
Address: Submitted By: KURT PRIEBE
Collected By: Customer
Lab ID Sample Layer Name / Asbestos Asbestos Type Non-Asbestos
Client ID Location Sample Description Detected (%) Constituents
0068137-001 UNIT 1, LIVING LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber 10%
CF-1 RM Sheetrock, White/ Brown
Gypsum
Cazbonates
Mica 90%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber <I%
Texture, White Carbonates
Mica
Q~
Binder/Filler 99%
0068137-002 ROOF ABOVE Asphaltic Shingle, Black/ Red/ White No Fibrous Glass 15%
CF-2 UNIT 1
Carbonates
Quartz
Binder/Filler 85%
0068137-003 ROOF ABOVE Asphaltic Shingle, Black No Cellulose Fiber 20%
CF-3 iJNIT I Synthetic Fiber 5%
Gypsum
Q~
Binder/Filler 75%
0068137-004 ROOF ABOVE Asphaltic Shingle, Black/ Red/ White No Fibrous Glass 15%
CF-4 iJNIT 5
Cazbonates
Quartz
Binder/Filler 85%
0068137-005 ROOF ABOVE Asphaltic Shingle, Black/ White No Cellulose Fiber 20%
CF-5 [J1VIT 5 Synthetic Fiber 5%
Gypsum
Quartz
Binder/Filler 75%
0068137-006 ROOF ABOVE Asphaltic Shingle, Black/ Pink/ No Cellulose Fiber 25%
CF-6 UNIT 6 White
Carbonates
Quarts
Binder/Filler 75%
Page 1 of 17
EMC LABS, '~V. Laboratory Report
9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 0068137
Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 -Fax: (480) 893-1726
Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Lil=-ht Microscopy
NVLAP#101926-0
Client: TERRACON, INC. Job# / P.O. #: 62087010
Address: 11849 W. EXECUTIVE DR, STE G Date Received: 09/05/2008
BOISE ID 83713 Date Analyzed: 09/09/2008
Collected: 09/04/2008 Date Reported: 09/09/2008
Project Name/ CREST FALLEN APTS EPA Method: EPA 600/M4-82-020
Address: Submitted By: KURT PRIEBE
Collected By: Customer
Lab ID Sample Layer Name / Asbestos Asbestos Type Non-Asbestos
Client ID Location Sample Description Detected (%) Constituents
0068137-007 ROOF ABOVE Asphaltic Shingle, Black/ Pink/ No Cellulose Fiber 25%
CF-7 UMT 8 ~~~ Synthetic Fiber 5%
Carbonates
Q~
Binder/Filler 70%
0068137-008 UMT 1 LIVING LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber 10%
CF-8 RM Sheelrock, White/ Brown
Gypsum
Carbonates
Mica 90%
LAYER 2 yes Chrysotile 3%
Texture, Beige Carbonates
Note: Very small amount oftexture Mica
Quarl-c
Binder/Filler 97%
LAYER3 No
Texture /Paint, White/ Yellow Carbonates
Mica
Quartz
Binder/Filler 100%
0068137-009 UTILITY RM OFF LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber 95%
CF-9 UNIT 1 Insulation, Brown
Carbonates
Gypsum
Binder/Filler 5%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber 50%
Paper Backing/Mastic, Black Gypsum
Binder/Filler 50%
0068137-010 UNIT 2 BATHRM Lath, Gray/ Beige No
CF-10 Note: No Plaster Present Gypsum
Quartz
Carbonates
Mica
Binder/Filler 100%
Page 2 of 17
EMC LABS, II ~V. Laboratory Report
9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 0068137
Phone: 800-362-3373 or480-940-5294 -Fax: (480) 893-1726
Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Licht Microscopy
NVLAP#101926-0
Client: TERRACON, INC. Job# / P.O. #: 62087010
Address: 11849 W. EXECUTIVE DR, STE G Date Received: 09/05/2008
BOISE ID 83713 Date Analyzed: 09/09/2008
Collected: 09/04/2008 Date Reported: 09/09/2008
Project Name/ CREST FALLEN APTS EPA Method: EPA 600/M4-82-020
Address: Submitted By: KURT PRIEBE
Collected By: Customer
Lab ID Sample Layer Name / Asbestos Asbestos Type Non-Asbestos
Client ID Location Sample Description Detected (%) Constituents
0068137-011 UMT 2 LAYER 1
CF-11 9"x9" VFT, Gray/ Black
LAYER 2
Mastic, Brown
LAYER 3
Vapor Barrier, Black
LAYER 4
Mastic, Brown
No
No
No
No
Cellulose Fiber 20%
Synthetic Fiber 5%
Carbonates
Quartz
Binder/Filler 75%
Cellulose Fiber 4%
Synthetic Fiber 2%
Carbonates
GYPS
Quartz
Binder/Filler 94%
Cellulose Fiber 65%
Gypsum
Binder/Filler 35%
Cellulose Fiber 5%
Gypsum
Quartz
Binder/Filler 95%
0068137-012 UMT 2 CEILING LAYER 1
CF-12 Sheetrock, White/Brown
No
Cellulose Fiber 10%
Gypsum
Carbonates
Mica 90%
LAYER 2 No
Texture /Paint, White ~~~~
Note: Sample is mainly Paint -little Gyps
Texture present Qum
Binder/Filler 100%
0068137-013 IJNIT 3 BATHRM LAYER I Yes Chrysolite 15% Cellulose Fiber 5%
CF-13 Vinyl Wall Cover, Beige/ White Gypsum
Q~
Carbonates
Binder/Filler SO%
LAYER 2 yes Chrysolite 3% Cellulose Fiber <1 %
MasticPCexture, Beige/ Yellow Gyps
Carbonates
Binder/Filler 96%
Page 3 of 17
EMC LABS, l i1- ~. Laboratory Report
9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, Az 85044 006 8137
Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 -Fax: (480) 893-1726
Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy
NVLAP#101926-0
Client: TERRACON, INC. Job# / P.O. #: 62087010
Address: 11849 W. EXECUTIVE DR, STE G Date Received: 09/05/2008
BOISE ID 83713 Date Analyzed: 09/09/2008
Collected: 09/04/2008 Date Reported: 09/09/2008
Project Name/ CREST FALLEN APTS EPA Method: EPA 600/M4-82-020
Address: Submitted By: KURT PRIEBE
Collected By: Customer
Lab ID Sample Layer Name / Asbestos Asbestos Type Non-Asbestos
Client ID Location Sample Description Detected (%) Constituents
0068137-014 [1MT 3 BATHRM LAYER 1 Yes Chrysotile 15% Cellulose Fiber 5%
CF-14 Vinyl Wall Cover, Beige/White Gypy.~
Q~
Carbonates
Binder/Filler 80%
LAYER Z Yes Chrysotile 4% Cellulose Fiber 2%
Mastic/Texture, Beige/ Yellow Cazbonates
GYPS
Binder/Filler 94%
0068137-015 UMT 3 BATHRM LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber 10%
CF-15 WALL Sheetrock,White/Brown
Gypsum
Cazbonates
Mica 90%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber 2%
Texture, Beige Gypsum
Mica
Cazbonates
Binder/Filler 98%
0068137-016 UNIT 3 BATHRM Lath, Gray/Beige No
CF-16 WALL Note: No Plaster Present
Gypsum
Quaztz
Carbonates
Mica
Binder/Filler 100%
0068137-017 UNIT 3 LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber 10%
CF-17 Sheetrock, White/ Brown Gypsum
Carbonates
Mica 90%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber 2%
Texture, Off White Gypsum
Mica
Carbonates
Binder/Filler 98%
Page 4 of 17
EMC LABS, /i1, V. Laboratory Report
9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoeaiz, AZ 85044 0068137
Phoue: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Faz: (480) 893-1726
Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Lit?ht Microscony
NVLAP#101926-0
Client: TERRACON, INC. Job# / P.O. #: 62087010
Address: 11849 W. EXECUTIVE DR, STE G Date Received: 09/05/2008
BOISE ID 83713 Date Analyzed: 09/09/2008
Collected: 09/04/2008 Date Reported: 09/09/2008
Project Name/ CREST FALLEN APTS EPA Method: EPA 600/M4-82-020
Address: Submitted By: KURT PRIEBE
Collected By: Customer
Lab ID Sample Layer Name / Asbestos Asbestos Type Non-Asbestos
Client ID Location Sample Description Detected (%) Constituents
0068137-018 iINIT 4 CHIMNEY Plaster, Beige/ Tan No Cellulose Fiber <1%
CF-18 Gypsum
Quarts
Perlite
Cazbonates
Mica
Binder/Filler 99%
0068137-019 UNIT 4 WALL LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber 3%
CF-19 Leveling Compound, White Gyps
Quartz
Cazbonates
Mica
Binder/Filler 97%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber <1%
Plaster, Beige/ Tan Gypsum
Quartz
Mica
Perlite
Carbonates 99%
LAYER 3 No Cellulose Fiber ] 0%
Sheetrock, White/Brown Gypsum
Cazbonates
Mica 90%
0068137-020 iJNIT 4 CEILING LAYER 1 No
CF-20 Plaster-Scratch Coat, White/ Gray Gypsum
Quanc~
Perlite
Cazbonates
Binder/Filler 100%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber 1%
Plaster, Beige Gyps
Quartz
Cazbonates
Binder/Filler 99%
Page 5 of 17
EMC LABS, I ~V. Laboratory Report
9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 0068137
Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 -Fax: (480) 893-1726
Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Lis:ht Microscony
NVLAP#101926-0
Client: TERRACON, INC. Job# / P.O. #: 62087010
Address: 11849 W. EXECUTIVE DR, STE G Date Received: 09/05/2008
BOISE ID 83713 Date Analyzed: 09/09/2008
Collected: 09/04/2008 Date Reported: 09/09/2008
Project Name/ CREST FALLEN APTS EPA Method: EPA 600/M4-82-020
Address: Submitted By: KURT PRIEBE
Collected By: Customer
Lab ID Sample Layer Name / Asbestos Asbestos Type Non-Asbestos
Client ID Location Sample Description Detected (%) Constituents
0068137-021 [JNIT 4 CEILING LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber 95%
CF-21 Insulation, Brown Gypsum 5%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber 50%
Paper Backing/Mastio, Black Gyps
Q~
Binder/Filler 50%
0068137-022 [JNIT 5 LAYER I No
CF-22 12"x12" Floor Tile, Gray Carbonates
Quazlz
Binder/Filler 100%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber 2%
Mastic, Yellow ~~~~
Gypsum
Binder/Filler 98%
0068137-023 LTIVIT 5 LAYER t No
CF-23 12"x12" Floor Tile, Gray Carbonates
Quanc~
Binder/Filler
100%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber 3%
Mastic, Yellow Carbonates
Gypsum
Quartz
Binder/Filler 97%
Page 6 of 17
EMC LABS, I ~V ^ Laboratory Report
9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, Az 85044 0068137
Phoue: 800-362-3373 or480-940-5294 -Fag: (480) 893-1726
Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Lis?ht Microsconv
NVLAP#101926-0
Client: TERRACON, INC. Job# / P.O. #: 62087010
Address: 11849 W. EXECUTIVE DR, STE G Date Received: 09/05/2008
BOISE ID 83713 Date Analyzed: 09/09/2008
Collected: 09/04/2008 Date Reported: 09/09/2008
Project Name/ CREST FALLEN APTS EPA Method: EPA 600/M4-82-020
Address: Submitted By: KURT PRIEBE
Collected By: Customer
Lab ID Sample Layer Name / Asbestos Asbestos Type Non-Asbestos
Client ID Location Sample Description Detected (%) Constituents
0068137-024 iJNIT 5 LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber 10%
CF-24 Sheetrock, White/ Brown Gypy.~
Carbonates
Mica 90%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber 1%
Plaster-Scratch Coat, Beige/ Tan ~~
Gypsum
Perlite
Binder/Filler 99%
LAYER3 No
Plaster-Finish Coat, White Gypsum
Quartz
Carbonates
Binder/Filler 100%
LAYER 4 No Cellulose Fiber 2%
Texture /Paint, Gray Gypsum
Note: Sample is mainly Paint -little Mica
Texture present Cazbonates
Binder/Filler 98%
0068137-025 UNIT 5 LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber 10%
CF-25 Sheetrock, White/ Brown Gypsum
Cazbonates
Mica 90%
LAYER2 No
Plaster-Scratch Coat, Beige/ Tan Gypsum
Quaztz
Perlite
Mica
Cazbonates 100%
LAYER3 No
Plaster-Finish Coat, White Gypsum
Quartz
Carbonates
Binder/Filler 100%
0068137-026 OFFICE, CEILING Insulation, Brown No Mineral Wool 99%
CF-26 Gypsum 1%
Page 7 of 77
EMC LABS, INV. Laboratory Report
9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoeuiz, AZ 85044 0068137
Phoue: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Faz: (480) 893-1726
Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy
NVLAP#101926-0
Client: TERRACON, INC. Job# / P.O. #: 62087010
Address: 11849 W. EXECUTIVE DR, STE G Date Received: 09/05/2008
BOISE ID 83713 Date Analyzed: 09/09/2008
Collected: 09/04/2008 Date Reported: 09/09/2008
Project Name/ CREST FALLEN APTS EPA Method: EPA 600/M4-82-020
Address: Submitted By: KURT PRIEBE
Collected By: Customer
Lab ID Sample Layer Name / Asbestos Asbestos Type Non-Asbestos
Client ID Location Sample Description Detected (%) Constituents
0068137-027 OFFICE, CEILING 1x2 Ceiling Tile, Tan/ White No Cellulose Fiber 85%
CF-27 Mineral Wool 2%
Gypsum
Cazbonates
Binder/Filler 13%
0068137-028 OFFICE, CEILING 4x8 Ceiling Tile, Tan/ White No Cellulose Fiber 85%
CF-28 Mineral Wool 2%
Gypsum
Cazbonates
Binder/Filler 13%
0068137-029 OFFICE, CEILING LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber <1%
CF-29 Plaster-Scratch Coat, Beige/ Tan Gypsum
Q~
Cazbonates
Mica 99%
LAYER2 No
Plaster-Finish Coat/Leveling Carbonates
Compound, White Gypy.~
Q~
Binder/Filler 100%
0068137-030 OFFICE, CEILING, LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber 10%
CF-30 BACK RM Sheetrock, White/ Brown
Gypsum
Carbonates
Mica
l2uaziz 90%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber <I%
Joint Compound, White Gypsum
Mica
Cazbonates 99%
LAYER 3 No
Texture, Beige Gypsum
Mica
Carbonates
Binder/Filler 100%
Page 8 of 17
EMC LABS, I ~V. Laboratory Report
9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 0068137
Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 -Fax: (480) 893-1726
Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Licht Microscouy
NVLAP#101926-0
Client: TERRACON, INC. Job# / P.O. #: 62087010
Address: 11849 W. EXECUTIVE DR, STE G Date Received: 09/05/2008
BOISE ID 83713 Date Analyzed: 09/09/2008
Collected: 09/04/2008 Date Reported: 09/09/2008
Project Name/ CREST FALLEN APTS EPA Method: EPA 600/M4-82-020
Address: Submitted By: KURT PRIEBE
Collected By: Customer
Lab ID Sample Layer Name / Asbestos Asbestos Type Non-Asbestos
Client ID Location Sample Description Detected (%) Constituents
0068137-031 OFFICE, CEILING, LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber 10%
CF-31 BACK RM Sheetrock, White/ Brawn
Gypsum
Carbonates
Mica
Quartz 90%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber <1%
Texture, White Gypsum
Mica
Carbonates
Binder/Filler 99%
0068137-032 OFFICE, CEILING, LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber ]0%
CF-32 BACK RM Sheetrock, White/ Brown
Gypsum
Carbonates
Mica
Quartz 90%
LAYER2 No Cellulose Fiber <1%
Joint Compound, White Gyps
Mica
Carbonates 99%
LAYER3 No
Texture, Beige Gypsum
Mica
Carbonates
Binder/Filler 100%
0068137-033 WEST SIDE OF LAYER 1 No
CF-33 OFFICE BLDG Plaster-Scratch Coat, Beige/ Gray
Gypsum
Q~
Carbonates
Mica 100%
LAYER2 No
Plaster-Finish Coat, Gray Gyps
Quartz
Carbonates
Binder/Filler 100%
Page 9 of 17
EMC LABS, I~V. Laboratory Report
9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoeniz, AZ 85044 0068137
Phone: 500-362-3373 or480-940-5294 - Faa: (480) 893-1726
Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy
NVLAP#101926-0
Client: TERRACON, INC. Job# / P.O. #: 62087010
Address: 11849 W. EXECUTIVE DR, STE G Date Received: 09/05/2008
BOISE ID 83713 Date Analyzed: 09/09/2008
Collected: 09/04/2008 Date Reported: 09/09/2008
Project Name/ CREST FALLEN APTS EPA Method: EPA 600/M4-82-020
Address: Submitted By: KURT PRIEBE
Collected By: Customer
Lab ID Sample Layer Name / Asbestos Asbestos Type Non-Asbestos
Client ID Location Sample Description Detected (%) Constituents
0068137-034 OFFICE, ROOF Asphaltic Shingle, Black/ Gray No Fibrous Glass 15%
CF-34 ABOVE BACK
DOOR
Cazbonates
Quartz
Binder/Filler 85%
0068137-035 OFFICE, ROOF Asphaltic Shingle, Black/ Brown No Fibrous Glass 15%
CF-35 ABOVE BACK
DOOR
Carbonates
Quartz
Binder/Filler
85%
0068137-036 OFFICE, ROOF ON Asphaltic Shingle, Black/ Lt. Blue No Cellulose Fiber 25%
CF-36 SW PORTION
Carbonates
Q~
Binder/Filler 75%
0068137-037 iJNIT 6 KITCHEN LAYER 1 yes Chrysotile 15%
CF-37 VSF, Tan/ Beige Gypsum
Cazbonates
Binder/Filler 85%
LAYER 2 yes Chrysotile 5% Cellulose Fiber <1%
Mastic, Yellow Cazbonates
Note: Difficult to sepazate adjacent Gypsum
layers Binder/Filler 94%
LAYER 3 No Cellulose Fiber 20%
VSF, Brown/ Purple Synthetic Fiber 5%
Cazbonates
Gypsum
Binder/Filler 75%
LAYER 4 No Cellulose Fiber 1
Leveling Compound/Mastic, Gray Gypsum
Quartz
Binder/Filler 99%
Page 10 of 17
EMC LABS, INC. Laboratory Report
9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 0068137
Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 -Fax: (480) 893-1726
Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscogv
NVLAP#101926-0
Client: TERRACON, INC. Job# / P.O. #: 62087010
Address: 11849 W. EXECUTIVE DR, STE G Date Received: 09/05/2008
BOISE ID 83713 Date Analyzed: 09/09/2008
Collected: 09/04/2008 Date Reported: 09/09/2008
Project Name/ CREST FALLEN APTS EPA Method: EPA 600/M4-82-020
Address: Submitted By: KURT PRIEBE
Collected By: Customer
Lab ID
Client ID Sample
Location Layer Name /
Sample Description Asbestos
Detected Asbestos Type
(%) Non-Asbestos
Constituents
0068137-038 iJNIT 6 KITCHEN LAYER 1 yes Chrysotile 15%
CF-38 VSF, Tan/ Beige Gyps
Carbonates
Binder/Filler 85%
LAYER2 yes Chrysotile 3% Cellulose Fiber 1%
Mastic, Yellow Carbonates
Note: Difficult to separate adjacent Gyps
layers Binder/Filler 96%
LAYER 3 No Cellulose Fiber 20%
VSF, Brown/ Purple Synthetic Fiber 5%
Carbonates
C*YP~
Binder/Filler 75%
LAYER 4 No Cellulose Fiber 5%
Leveling Compound/Mastic, Gray Synthetic Fiber 2%
Gypsum
Quartz
Binder/Filler 93%
0068137-039 iJNIT 6 KITCHEN LAYER 1 yes Chrysotile IS%
CF-39 VSF, Tan/ Beige Gypsum
Carbonates
Binder/Filler 85%
LAYER Z yes Chrysotile 4%
Mastic, Yellow Cazbonates
Note: Difficult to separate adjacent Gyps
layers Binder/Filler 96%
LAYER 3 No Cellulose Fiber 20%
VSF, Brown/ Purple Synthetic Fiber 5%
Cazbonates
Gypsum
Binder/Filler 75%
LAYER 4 No Cellulose Fiber 3%
Leveling Compound/Mastic, Gray Gypsum
Qum
Binder/Filler 97%
Page 11 of 17
EMC LABS, I~V. Laboratory Report
9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 0068137
Phoue: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 -Fag: (480) 893-1726
Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Lieht Microscony
NVLAP#101926-0
Client: TERRACON, INC. Job# / P.O. #: 62087010
Address: 11849 W. EXECUTIVE DR, STE G Date Received: 09/05/2008
BOISE ID 83713 Date Analyzed: 09/09/2008
Collected: 09/04/2008 Date Reported: 09/09/2008
Project Name/ CREST FALLEN APTS EPA Method: EPA 600/M4-82-020
Address: Submitted By: KURT PRIEBE
Collected By: Customer
Lab ID Sample Layer Name / Asbestos Asbestos Type Non-Asbestos
Client ID Location Sample Description Detected (%) Constituents
0068137-040 LIMIT 6 LIVING LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber 10%
CF-40 RM CEILING ]hywall, White/ Brown
GYPS
Carbonates
Mica 90%
LAYER2 Yes Chrysotile 3% Cellulose Fiber 5%
Texture, Beige Carbonates
Mica
Binder/Filler 92%
0068137-041 CEILING UNIT 6 LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber 97%
CF-41 Insulation, Brown Gypsum 3%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber 50%
Paper Backing/Mastic, Black Gypsum
Binder/Filler 50%
0068137-042 LIMIT 6 BEDRM LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber 10%
CF-42 Drywall, White/ Brown Gypsum
Carbonates
Mica 90%
LAYER 2 yes Chrysotile 2% Cellulose Fiber 3%
Texture, Beige Carbonates
Mica
Binder/Filler 95%
0068137-043 LIMIT 6 LIVING LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber 10%
CF-43 12M Sheetrock, White/ Brown
Gypsum
Carbonates
Mica 90%
LAYER2 No
Texture /Paint, White/ Beige Gypsum
Note: Sample is mainly Paint - no Binder/Filler 100%
Texture present
Page 12 of 17
EMC LABS, I~V^ Laboratory Report
9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 0068137
Phone: 800-362-3373 or480-940-5294 -Fax: (480) 893-1726
Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microsconv
NVLAP#101926-0
Client: TERRACON, INC. Job# / P.O. #: 62087010
Address: 11849 W. EXECUTIVE DR, STE G Date Received: 09/05/2008
BOISE ID 83713 Date Analyzed: 09/09/2008
Collected: 09/04/2008 Date Reported: 09/09/2008
Project Name/ CREST FALLEN APTS EPA Method: EPA 600/M4-82-020
Address: Submitted By: KURT PRIEBE
Collected By: Customer
Lab ID Sample Layer Name / Asbestos Asbestos Type Non-Asbestos
Client ID Location Sample Description Detected (%) Constituents
0068137-044 UNIT 6 BATHRM LAYER t
CF-44 VSF, Tan/ White
LAYER2
Mastic, Yellow
No Cellulose Fiber 17%
Fibrous Glass 3%
Gypsum
Perlite
Quartz
Binder/Filler 80%
No Cellulose Fiber 3%
Gypsum
Perlite
Quartz
Binder/Filler 97%
0068137-045 UNIT 6 BATHRM LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber 17%
CF-45 VSF, Tan/ White Fibrous Glass 3%
Gypsum
Perlite
Quarh~
Binder/Filler 80%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber 2%
Mastic, Yellow Fibrous Glass <i%
Gypsum
Perlite
Q~
Binder/Filler 97%
0068137-046 UNIT 6 BATHRM Mastic, Yellow
CF-46 WALL
No Cellulose Fiber <1%
Carbonates
Gypsum
Quartz
Binder/Filler 99%
Page 13 of 17
EMC LABS, I~V^ Laboratory Report
9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 0068137
Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 -Fax: (480) 893-1726
Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscouy
NVLAP#101926-0
Client: TERRACON, INC. Job# / P.O. #: 62087010
Address: 11849 W. EXECUTIVE DR, STE G Date Received: 09/05/2008
BOISE ID 83713 Date Analyzed: 09/09/2008
Collected: 09/04/2008 Date Reported: 09/09/2008
Project Name/ CREST FALLEN APTS EPA Method: EPA 600/M4-82-020
Address: Submitted By: KURT PRIEBE
Collected By: Customer
Lab ID Sample Layer Name / Asbestos Asbestos Type Non-Asbestos
Client ID Location Sampte Description Detected (%) Constituents
0068137-047 EXTERIOR OF LAYER 1 No Fibrous Glass 50%
CF-47 UNIT 6 Fake Brick Siding, Pink
GYPS
Carbonates
Q~
Binder/Filler 50%
LAYER 2 No Fibrous Glass 2%
Mastic, Beige Gypsum
Quarzc
Binder/Filler 98%
0068137-048 iJNIT 7 KITCHEN LAYER 1 No
CF-48 VSF, Beige Cazbonates
Qum
Binder/Filler 100%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber 5%
Mastic, Yellow Gypsum
Binder/Filler 95%
0068137-049 iJNIT 7 KITCHEN LAYER 1 No
CF-49 VSF, Beige Carbonates
Q~
Binder/Filler 100%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber 10%
Mastio, Yellow Carbonates
Gypsum
Binder/Filler 90%
0068137-050 UNIT 7 KITCHEN LAYER 1 No
CF-50 VSF, Beige Carbonates
Quartz
Binder/Filler 100%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber 5%
Mastic, Yellow Gypsum
Binder/Filler 95%
Page 14 of 17
EMC LABS, I ~V ^ Laboratory Report
9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 0068137
Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 -Fax: (480) 893-1726
Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Lisht Microscony
NVLAP#101926-0
Client: TERRACON, INC. Job# / P.O. #: 62087010
Address: 11849 W. EXECUTIVE DR, STE G Date Received: 09%05/2008
BOISE ID 83713 Date Analyzed: 09/09/2008
Collected: 09/04/2008 Date Reported: 09/09/2008
Project Name/ CREST FALLEN APTS EPA Method: EPA 600/M4-82-020
Address: Submitted By: KURT PRIEBE
Collected By: Customer
Lab ID Sample Layer Name / Asbestos Asbestos Type Non-Asbestos
Client ID Location Sample Description Detected (%) Constituents
0068137-051 UNIT 7 LIVING LAYER I No Cellulose Fiber ]0%
CF-51 ItM Sheetrock, White/ Brown
Gypsum
Carbonates
Mica 90%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber 1
Texture, White Gypy.~
Mica
Carbonates
Binder/Filler 99%
0068137-052 UNIT 7 BEDRM LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber 10%
CF-52 Sheetrock, White/ Brown Gyps
Carbonates
Mica 90%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber <1%
Texture, White Gyps
Mica
Carbonates
Binder/Filler 99%
0068137-053 UNIT 7 BATHRM Insulation, Yellow No Fibrous Glass 97%
CF-53 Cellulose Fiber 1%
Gypsum
Quartz 2%
0068137-054 UNIT 7 BATHRM LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber 18%
CF-54 VSF, Beige/White Fibrous Glass 2%
Carbonates
GYPS
Binder/Filler 80%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber 2%
Mastic, Yellow Fibrous Glass <1%
Gypsum
Carbonates
Binder/Filler 97%
Page 15 of 17
EMC LABS, I~V. Laboratory Report
9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 0068137
Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 -Fag: (480) 893-1726
Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Lit?ht Microscoay
NVLAP#101926-0
Client: TERRACON, INC. Job# / P.O. #: 62087010
Address: 11849 W. EXECUTIVE DR, STE G Date Received: 09/05/2008
BOISE ID 83713 Date Analyzed: 09/09/2008
Collected: 09/04/2008 Date Reported: 09/09/2008
Project Name/ CREST FALLEN APTS EPA Method: EPA 600/M4-82-020
Address: Submitted By: KURT PRIEBE
Collected By: Customer
Lab ID Sample Layer Name / Asbestos Asbestos Type Non-Asbestos
Client ID Location Sample Description Detected (%) Constituents
0068137-055 UNIT 7 BATHRM LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber 18%
CF-55 VSF, Beige/ White Fibrous Glass 2%
Carbonates
C*YP~
Binder/Filler 80%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber 2%
Mastic, Yellow Gypsiun
Carbonates
Binder/Filler 98%
0068137-056 UNIT 7 BATHRM LAYER 1 No Cellulose Fiber 18%
CF-56 VSF, Beige/ White Fibrous Glass 2%
Carbonates
Gypsum
Binder/Filler 80%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber 4%
Mastic, Yellow Fibrous Glass <1%
Gypsum
Carbonates
Binder/Filler 95%
0068137-057 UNIT 7 BEHIND Tar Paper, Black No Cellulose Fiber 65%
CF-57 SHEETROCK
Gypsum
' Binder/Filler 35%
0068137-058 UNIT 8 CEILING Blown-in Insulation, Brown) Tan No Cellulose Fiber 95%
CF-58 Carbonates
Gypsum 5%
0068137-059 UNIT 8 WALL Texture, Beige No Cellulose Fiber <1%
CF-59 Carbonates
Mica
Quartz
Binder/Filler 99%
0068137-060 OUTSIDE UNIT 7 Fake Brick Siding, Beige/ Lt. Pink No Fibrous Glass 50%
CF-60 Gypsum
Quarts
Binder/Filler 50%
Page 16 of 17
EMC LABS, INC. Laboratory Report
9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 0068137
Pboue: 800-362-3373 or480-940-5294 -Fax: (480) 893-1726
Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Li~bt Microscouy
NVLAP#101926-0
Client: TERRACON, INC. Job# / P.O. #: 62087010
Address: 11849 W. EXECUTIVE DR, STE G Date Received: 09/05/2008
BOISE ID 83713 Date Analyzed: 09/09/2008
Collected: 09/04/2008 Date Reported: 09/09/2008
Project Name/ CREST FALLEN APTS EPA Method: EPA 600/M4-82-020
Address: Submitted By: KURT PRIEBE
Collected By: Customer
Lab ID Sample Layer Name / Asbestos Asbestos Type Non-Asbestos
Client ID Location Sampte Description Detected (%) Constituents
0068137-061 WEST SHED ROOF LAYER 1 No Fibrous Glass 15°/a
CF-61 Asphaltic Shingle, Black/ White Cazborlates
Quartz
Binder/Filler 85%
LAYER 2 No Cellulose Fiber 65%
Roof Felt, Black Gypsum
Binder/Filler 35°/a
0068137-062 SHED #3 ROOF Asphaltic Shingle, Black/ White No Fibrous Glass 15%
CF-62 Carbonates
Quartz
Binder/Filler
85%
Analyst - Kurt Kettler Signatory -Lab Director -Kurt Kettler
7lstlnctly etretlfled, easyy separable layerm of samples ere eneiymd ea eubaemples of the whole and we reported aeparetey for eaoh dlaoemeble layer. Ag analyses ere derived from caybmted visual estlnmte end meastved
n wa1gM parted unless otlterwlse noted. The report eppges to the standards or procedures Iderrtl8ed and to the eemple(a) tested. The test resubs ere not neoasemfly krdicated w repreeerrtetlve of Me que0ges of Ste lot
from wAdch the sample was taken or of appwenfly Iderrflwl w sbngw prodrtab, nw do they repreeerd an ongobr8 Vu~tY esaraance protpem unless so noted. These repwb ere fm fire exduaNe use of the eddreaeed afl°m end
hat trreywig not M reproduced who0y w N part for edvertlaing w oNw purposes ovw our slgtrehne w N conneoflon wlttr our name without apeotel written permission. The report sha0 not be reproduced except b tug,
aiflroutvvdtten approval by our laboratory. The samptea not destroyed bt teafln9 are retefned ° mednarm ofthtrly days. The laboratory measuremert of uncerte6rry fw trre teat mettrod b aPProameteb ~1 % bywe~M.
4caedited by the Naflonel Insdhrle of Stetrdards end Technoiagy, Volrmtery Laboratory Aure~tlon Program for selected teat method fot asbestos. The ewedltedon w arty report ganereted bytNs labwatory hr noway
mrretitutea w ImpAea product eertlflceflon, approval, w endormemerrt bythe Nedonel Inetlbrte of 8fertdwds end Technology. The report must not be used by wry errflty fo dehri product endorsemem by NVLAP m erry egenry
rf the U.S. l3ovemmetrt Polertzed UgM ANwasooPY may not be oorrelaterdly regable M detecdng eabeatea b flow coverings end almgernon-tdable orgeNaagy bound matedale.
Page 17 of 17
Page / of
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
EMC Laboratories
8830 S. 51 ~ St., Ste B-109
Phoenix, AZ 85044
{800) 362-3373 Fax {480}893-1726
~ /'
COMPANY NAME: ~Pr'1'R!'u~ (x/154 ~G~t~J .7~'`G
/~o,~ Tl7 P~7/~
CONTACT: , c, r ~ •'' i ~ e
Phone/Fax: .? ~ 8 '- 3~,//3 - 9S~ O j.?OP 3?~ 9.592
Email: ~"~fJi'i POP ~ tPr'/'4ro/i . (O/" 1
S !37
TAT : /~G~~
Rec' d: .~yy
EMC USE ONLYI~ ~ ~ P.17;
BILL TO: (If Different Lotmdon)
Naw Afxepting• VISA- MASTERCARD Price Quoted: $ ~ so I ~mP~ $ I Layers'
COMPLETE ITEMS 1-4: (Failure to complete any it may cause a delay In processing or analyzing your samples)'
1. TURNAROUND TIME: [4hr rush} [8hr Wish} i-Day] [2-Day] [3-Day] [5-Day] [6-10 Day]
••••p,114L confirmation of turnaround time is u~l[ed
••"AddiUonal charges for rusfi analysis (please call marketing department for pricing details)
'•••Laboratory analysts may be subject t credit terms ere not met
2. TYPE OF ANALYSIS: ulk-PL [Air-PCM] [Lead [Point Courrt] [Fungi: AOC, W-C, Bulk, Swab, Tape]
3. DISPOSAL INSTRUCTION se of sam lea at EMC / [Return samples to me at my e~ Hansa]
s......,../.~~ GA asvc bnm 9nA1vC1S 1
// Oil VV lli7[ /!lUH:i7lC IOICJIGI el+c, vrrrv rrxr ..,w .~ ~- - - -- -
4. Project Name: Cr`PSf /r//'°'~ ~~~~~~h /~ --
P.O. Number- Project Number. ~~~ ~ 7D~U
EMC
SAMPLE
# CL{ENT
SAMPLE x DATE & TIME
SAMPLED LOCATION/MATERIAL
TYPE 5empfes
Acxepted
Yes / NO AIR SAMPLE INFO / COMMENTS
aN aFF FLOW
RATE
S„ ~r /V o . Y O 6 -] Pf' r! /~`~!/!f S~Q/'~ r Y N
~ ' ~ 7~~/'4
C/ ~~ Y N
Q
r
C/' ` ~ ~ / /I'r*J~ Y N
fP! ~i ~~bt < O/ Y N
SGn C U N
N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
N
SPECIAL INSTRI
Sample Collector:
ors
Relinquished y: ~~ << ~ Date(Cime
ReGnquished~''^~-' ~~'~ Date(Time
9 00~ ~ Received ~ -
~~ Received by
Relinquished by: Date/Time ~ ~ Received by: ~~ Date,Tme:
In the evanl d any depute behvean fie above par0tre tCr erase er~dras o CCrenvJSa. patdt6 /~ that pulstlit2~ arnt venue rdll 6e in PlwanW, Arisara atM pn3va0itg party wID be e~lad m atbrmy's teas etW Coup
CCtRs.
O
~o
'O
V
Z
J
a
N
J
m
N
O
N
m
a
C
E~ s
~o
Y ~
~ ~
a .~
c ~
m m
LL
Ug
b
c
m o
~ o ~
`o ^ a
.$~mv
~ o
d ~ a
Y m v
~ ~ E E
I ~ i O
z' z
~~~ _.~
q~ C m r0 'O
C m
V d m m
N
a~ ~ {jl
W ~ ~ N
M
~ n ~ m
~ ~ ~
~'n ~ a u.
a ~
zv
o
~
a ~
~ fl
~
~
C
~~
J
a
~
~
~S
J
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~~
y
'1
C
o
~ ~
b
~
~~
`
~ C
!
v
~
~
~.
w ~ o ~ j
J v
~
~
~
~
~~
~ Jam'
~
~
..~
y
v
~0
~
~L
`~ C
~
fH ~ ~ 1 '~~~ ~r `
l v
~' rv~~~b
\
P
~ ~
~ b
\ r J
4 \
~
~ ~
~ 0
~ ,\
\ S1
l ,-~
\
l
\
l~
_1
~
, ~
~
~
G ~
~
~
~
` _
~
~
~
Q
~
,`v{
~
.~
~ ~ `I~• ~y~ ~ ~ \\`y ~
mm \ N
as
r19n z'
~i
~
~
v
~
U
v
v ~ 1
_ ,~•4
r
~ ~_
~ _S
O
...~
Z
J
a
N
Y
J
m
N
O
N
W
m
Q
t
Q ~
m ~
m
LL ~
U
w
a ~
g o ?+
o m
LL
4 ~
N
v m ~
~'l~~
2 L
a m
~ ~ m
6 ~ Z 2
m
~ c
m $
m u >
v n m m
0
n ~ ~
~ ~ cb
._~ m
~ ~ ~
m ~ c
in tS a a
z
o
d
W ~e
ZV
`
~ ~
O c
\`
`
~ ,~`
N C ~ ~Y 'Y
~ ~ \
~ a .N
~,
-
r~ ~ (
\ ~
V V V v V
t ~ e \
•.
~ ~ ~Q ~
e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C
~
~1 ~C ~, ~ ~
~
~ ~ \
'
~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ j~ `
C b b
~
\
~ ~ ,~
"'
C ~ h t'1{ ~~~ ~I ~ ~ ~~~
a .~ \ ` v1
vJ Z
v
~
~
v
~
v
v
v
v
S
~o
0
~'
O
J
C7
Z
J
a
Y
J
m
N
m
Q
C
r
L'
e
a
9m
7
e
0
u
D
m
E
z
m
0
c~ ~
p"j N
aD ~ ~
P)
~ ~ O
C7 - ei .N,.
d C
~ 4
of ~ a ~
°d` o
H ::
W R
ZU
o ~
~ ~~ \ ~1
~ v ~ ~ V
\
~ `~ \~ \ ~ ~,
~ ~ V V
/~
< ~
~ ~\
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j
J
~
\ ~` ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
\ 4
\~,
~t } \ \\\.
~ ° ~ 1 ~ ~
~, v ~ ~ ~ ~
4
0 ~ ~„ ~ ~n ~ M b ~ ~s
LL ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ 1
d y ~ ~ ~ ,~.' ~ ~ ~ a
aD
w z
~
t i
~
~
~
<~,
`~'
`~, 1,
tel.
~
~ V V V v
4
2
'° rM
a. ~s
m
m
z
d
Q
J
C7
Z
J
a
Y
J
m
N
O
m
y
Q
C
^w~p-
I~
z
m
O
E
2
C
v
m'
0
N
N
~ N
~ N7 NN
~_ ~% O
~ ~ v
m ~
W jf
(q ~ d li
_°
d
W ~
Z V
.l
``~
\
\~,
L
o
::.
m
S
~ ~
~~
"
`I
J
a -
~
`~
\~
V t
v ~
~ w ~
`, ~
~
~ ~
( \
4 ~ -v
~
`~
V Q V
~
c ~ t
~` ~
~:
~:
~
~
\ ~ ~~ ~ 1
o ~
~,
~
~
~
~
\ ~
~
~
4 ~
° ~
~
A ~
~
~ ~
a ~ ~-
gym..
g
~ ~
~ \
u- _t
\.` ~
~ ~ ~\
~
~'
r
o V
~ p ~ ~
T ~ "1
~ ~
~ \
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ S
~ ~
v
~ ~
~
. ;
°o ~' ~j ~,, ~~+ h M ~'+
L
d d ~ [~~vl
O
~
~
'~ M M ~M
E~
u`~ a ~
f } ~
~ ~ f
~ 1
~ }
~ 1 1I
~ V ~+
Z
S~
..I
Z
J
a
Y
J
m
N
0
r
w
m
a
O
^~
^
c
a
Z
0
a
i
a
~x
W
m
m
a
m
m
0
~ fN~~
~ t~f Q~
c~7
= o m~m_
~ ~ tl
~ c v
q a
Q o
= m
m
t~t~ m
Z U
._..,~ ~
~, s
~ `t.~
,. t
`~ \ o
~,
`~
~
o
.U
~ ~
~.Q`
~
~
~
O 1
~
~
-~'~
~c
m -
~
~.
` y
~
~~ _~
~ ~
e
~~
~~
~~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ,`
a
(
Z
~ `~
~
~~,
`Q v
o
~ ` ~ ~ ~
c ~ C
~~ ,.
`~~ ~ K ~ `~ ~ '6 ~ ice.
d
g 4
3 . ~
`\~
o •
`~
~
\ \
~1
~
~
~
.~
`. ~ ~ ~~
~
C
~ ~
\• ~ ~~ y b 3
.t
. ~. ~ d
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~`
Q ~
O ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ V
~ ~1
~~ ~ ~ ~ 1
U ~
~ ~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~
L (4~
l \ y 't
` Y V
_\ ~~ \ \ ~ 1 • 1
Os y
~z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ _ v
~o
9'°
.J
Z
J
a
Y
J
m
O
H
w
m
a
r~
z
~E
Z
m
a
0
of
L
9
W
"L"
a°
IL
vl
C
m
a
Z
c
m
0
~'.
u
0
m
a
z
c
m'
ti ~ ~
N
m
m
~ ~ ~ ~
m 01
~ c
0
t11 m° a
4 0
m
W ~
Z V
~
`a
V
\\
C
0
a
i
~
~
~
lq ~ \~
V ~
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
V
V
~
1
v
v b
~C
~
v
.b
~~
y .,~j
`~
'C
~
'~ c
l
`~v
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~ ~
v ~
~
~
a ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ s
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
a ~ V~ ~7~,
v, z' ~' ~ ~ ~
~, ~
~ ~
v LL
~, ~
~
v ~, ~,
d
S
M
o~
m
d
Y
J
a
J
a
a
Y
J
m
N
O
N
u1
m
a
0
r
c
0
a
~e
0
O
C
a
L'
~i
0
~~
~~~
~~~
~~
~~
m
~~~LL
a Z'
Z U
Q
Co
u
m
~
V
~
~
~
~
~
Q
`\ {
~
\ \~ t ~
,
V
~
`~
V
\~
V
\
~ ,\
!\~
v
=o
`f
e;
``~ ~
~ ~
~
~
~
V
.~ ~ ~, ~
`'1
~
~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~{ f
3 \ ~ l~
~
j ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
J ~
`~i
O M ~ ~'l ~` ~ ~ M ~\
~ }
m
~Z `~
V
v ~
v ~
v
v 1
V
v
a
~° ~ r
~, '~
~ ~
0
J
Z
a
m
0
m
a
C
r
m
d
0
~o.~
~m~
~~m
0
0
z
3
m'
0
~°
~~
Z~
~
o
~
d ~~
~
~
~ ~ J
~
~°
n ~ 3 t ~-
~
a° ~ ~ ~
~ ~, ti
~ ~ ~
l 3
'
.
~
~
~
)
o o ~ ..
N
o
~ ~
~ \~~
`' Q
~
g
~
~
a
~
,
~ . -~
`~
v
~'
r
~Vj,
' ;
~
~
~1
~ ~
\
4
~D
~~~
a
~
~~
~
~ ``
~ ~~
~ ~
~ ~
v
~ ~,
~ ~ ~ ~
g
a
~
~
~
~
N
viz' ti l~ ~
v l~
v
v v v