1982 07-28
.;
,4. ~ ~ • '
~~~~; ,~~
~~a
STATIE OF 9!?AFiO
a FFlae of THE A'roRVUV c,eNERn~
DAVID H. LEROY
AT`ORNEY GENERAL
BOISE 8720
A`T'^'ORNEY GENERr'1L OPINION N0. 82-6
TO: uTOSeDh L. Glc:_SY^-
Mayor, C'ty o_* '~:c~-idiaa
723 bier_dian Street
Meridia.r., ID 336x2
Per Request for Attorney General's Opinion
QJESTIOVS PRESF*,""~'~:
TELEPHON[
(20 tl) 33t-2nC0
'. Does Ic".aho Code § 67-65'!9 require two hearings at
both the ulanning and zoning commission and city council
leveT_s where a material c_;ange has been made in the
comprehensiti~e plan?
2. What constitu.tcz~ a "material change"?
3. '?^es Jdaho Code § 67-6525 *equire the city counc_1
to receive ;-econ~^T.enczaions from the, planning and zoni ;g
commission as r_o necessary changes in the comprehensive plan
and zoning ordinance t'_';at arise a<, a result of annexation?
4. Wh<•+- pracei'ures nn c;t be -`o"_owed in amending the
comprehensive p.an as a result of annexation?
5. If the c'^,anges in the comprehensive plan are
"material changes" must the procedure beg~r. anew at the
planningr and ; on: r.a commission levei or clay the planning and
zoning commission be bypassed. since they have already made
their recommended changes in tt•_e comp.rehensiv~~• _~'~an and
zoning ordinances as a result of the annexation?
6. If the necessary changes in the com~~xehensive plan
that ari se from 'she arrexatio_^. are "material ch.anres" must
___ the planning-a.nd zoning commission hold two public hearings
ATTORNEY G.5'NFn~k;, n-~T;~-n\
=a.ae 2
prior to makinc the recuired reco~tim-andatiens for the change
in the compre'~ensive p'~an and zoning o:cdinance?
CONCL?'SIO:QS
1. An ac?,d_~!oral hearina at the planning and zoning
C OmSR1S51on ieVel i5 only IleCeSSary __f a "matE'rlal Ci7 aItge" 1S
made _n the plan. Absent a change, no addi-ional hearing is
necessary. `Cho same is true fo_r the city council.
2. A "material chance" .~s contemplated by Idaho Code
§ 67-6509 (b) pertains to a c'aanae ir, the substance o~ the'
comprehensive plan rather e:^a.n m:u~or cha.^.ges made to coI rect
typogr_z.phical errors, lege.l descri~o~ion.s, or the like.
3. The cour_cil must receive recommendations from the
planning and zoning commmissior. prior o a^nexation.
4. The comprehensive plan -•houlc be amended. in the
manner provided for in Idaho Coc.-^_ C7-5509.
5. As long as the procedural requirements have been
followed throughout, __ is not necessary *_o begin the
process anew.
6. In our opi-'_on, additional hearings are only
required w:nen "materia~ changes" are mace in the matier
after it was presented at a publ_c hearing.
ANALYSIS:
Question 1. Must two hearings be held at each 1evc~l?
Idaho Code S 67-6509 (a? states in part that:
Fo1'_owina the comm:_ssio^ henr~_na, if tho
commission maces a material cha aye ir:
t::e olan, further notice and hearing
shall be provided before the commission
ie-:,ards the plan ~r;ith i~~
recommendation to the governing board.
Clearly, an additio.n<,? hearing at the commission level is
only necessary if a .,:aterial change is made in the elan.
Absen-'c a change, no aadi±ional hearing _.., necessary.
Idaho Code § 57-6509(b) provides in part ha+..:
_ _ .~
-e.~e. 3
5ollowina t_:e hearing of *_he governing
board, if the governing board makes a
material charge .. _;^,e p1a_^., further
notice ._._ - t,~,ar_na sha11 be provided
before the governing board adopts the
o__e.n.
Again, ar. add.:'.~ion~?_ hearing at the governinU board level is
only required '_,`_ a material c_h_anae i s made in the plan as
_~_
presented at t.:lo i'learl_1r?, $aIlc a. CnariQe, n0 add?trOrial
hearing is necessary.
Ta':irq it one ssteo further; sup,.,.^nse the governing board
does make a material c'r.a.ng.:: is ar, additional hearing also
necessary before the plannir~.g and. zoning commission? We
believe not. 'he -i:•,b'_i^. hearing requirement is obviously in
place to ensure oublic participation. On•;- repeat hearing at
either level satisfies t,at requires-::_;-t. e'~dditior.a__ly, the
statu±e is drafted in such a manner as to segregate the
hearing requirements at each level. "_ the governing board
makes the c'^:anae, __ ^;us*_ conduc'_ ar_ additional ..~ zinc but
need rot eturn the plan to the plann~ng and•zonine
commis s~ cn .
Question 2. 41hat is t,,e deg inition of a mater~.a'_
change a.~ used in ~daho Code ~ 67-55Gi:.(b;?
The ~,•crd "'materia"' when used as an adjective is
defined ae;
important; relating to the substance
rather than t^.e form; noing t.o the :-~orit
and essence.
Ballantyne's Law Dictionary 7£ '_ ?3d ed. 1959?
The term "mater=_a..l a'_t•^r<.tior~."' which is synonymous with
"material change°' is defi_rec~ as "A c"~anae in the terms of a
written instrument which gives a legal effect different from
that wn1Ch 1t rJr' glnally ,^.ad. " '_allc ntyne' s , SUDra.
In essence then, a material change is one which caould
change t=ze substa;^ce of a comprehensive plan; and therefore
change the effect that it might have. Cha.:ges which amount
to nothing more Lhar. corrections of typographica'_ errors or
gram4•.a_ical errors ape. so forth probab'.y do not rise t^ the
_evei of material change. See a1s=o ~~~anger v. 7r=h, 256
N.Y.S.2c. 227, 45 .Mice. 93 ('_965); ''.oys ~ icn~, 265 2. 2d
°_90, (Okla. 1954); S`rassf~r v. Bess, '65 :\ob. '?78 3?*,..':.2d
ATTe~NEy c~~~r~~,?l~ o_' ..~;,_o
a,-F, ,
Question 3. Does Idaho Code ;~ 67-6525 require the
gover, poarc;. to receive recor'm.endations from the planning
and zor.ina cr^+:!rission a.s a r~ _._t oY an annexation?
Idaho Code ~ 57-6525 states that-:
Prier to annexation of a.n unincorporated
arer:_, a city council s^.a" request and
receive a recommends*_io.^. from the
p1a°~.ni_na and zoning comrr.ission, or the
p'_c.:nninq commission and the onina
commission, o,^: 'she proposed plan: and
Z Onlr:a Ord'nr?.nC°_ CL?aiiC_~~c {Or thE`.
uP.1 nCOrbO rat eC: area.
The word "s^.all" when uses' _n a stat+~te is mandatory. Goff
v. H.J.3. Co., 95 Ir~.aho 337, X21 P.7.d. 661 (1974;. It must
~e concluded therefore that by using _lirectory lana~.:age the
legislature intended 'o ceu_re city councils to request and
receive recommendat o:s _ro_n. plannir.a and zo_^.' ^:a commissions
prior to annexation of an incorporated area.
Once the council has received those r~acommendatio*_a it
may go ahead and a^.r.ex the property <.nd *rake the necessary
changes to the co. ~bm :ensive plan and zoning ord9_nances as
required by the Local Planninc Ac±.
Questio-,_ 4. What procedures should be follo~.~ed in
enact~_,g changes in the comr_rer.ensive _lan as a result of
t'~e annexation?
~dahe Code ~ 67-5525 further states that "Each
commission and the city counci=_ sh<~.11 fol'~ow the notice and
hearing procedures urovido?. in § 67-6509, Idaho Code" when
discussing annexation. _ must be reasone3 that the
procedures to be followed in t^.akinq changes to the
COmprehE'.ns iVE?. Plan re SUlt:_;. ~ frOIC_ an anneX<!'_:iOP. are t'rre Same
procedure that shou'_d be used when ma~inq any changes to
the plan. Those proce< ,;res are eutl___~ed .in Idaho Code
§ 57-6509.
Question 5. T_f_ the change:; as a result of the
annex-+ticn ~ ~~ ma~~arial c : nqe,,, must the entire
compret ::nsive plan ar~end~ng ;:+rocr~ss begin anew?
Although the auestio^ is complicated, *_he answer is
relatively simple. A^-,suzr.ing that the correct procedure,
have been followed from.-the be~r.inr.i;^.c, that is, that when
the council anticipated annexation of an unincorpors.%.ed
---area, it asJeed and received recommendations from the
,~,, planning .and zoning commission as to c'nanges in zoning
•
o~,,,. -
ordinances and the comprehensive plan and further that in
formui~,tir~c those r.ecos~mendations the ?Manning and zcning
commiss~on~%~.~>,ld the requisite hearings, it can only be
concluded that the council and the planning and zoning
commission have met al' of the statutory recuireme*r,ts of the
Local Planning Act. 3ecause the pr.ooosed change is a
material cham:e l,actually any sabstaz:tive chance in the
comprehensive plan would be a mater_al change), it does not
invoke an.y special procedures dit=eren+_ from those th_ are
normally used when cons7-derma, a change to the plan. If the
plann=.ng and < .^ing ^i ,..:__on has consic,__red the annexation
and, recommended changes to the --_an ar.d tie requisite uublic
heari^g_^:as been held, there ._. ,., reed to start over again.
Those recomme.^c:ations are ,~ ~~.~asdec. _ t'~e city ccunc~__
which concurrs~;'~iy or immed'_°cely afte_- adoption of the
annexation crc:iaance ._ _ ~:nts the changes +_o the
comprehensive plan. T_-:_is, of course, assumes that the
council has also :^eld the r_eauisite ~a ~i~_'_'_c hearing recardina
the material changes to be :Wade to the plan.
T'^.e 1ang~_~.aee of ~ 57-6509 tha*_ pertains to additional
hearincs if materi-a_ changes are made, s?e-:cs to changes
made by th.,~ ~lannirg and zcning commission or the ci+_y
cour_ci1 as ~_. result of informa±ion received at a public
hearing. T^ese chances are. changes made in the
recoruner_datioas received from a planning and zoning
commission. If no chances are made :_r_ those
recommerdatic^.s, ^.o m.ate~ i-__:_ changes have been mad-e as a
result of the public ^.ee.rinc and the::-'fore additional
heari;,_ are unnecessary.
In summary, as to c_ as the plc-..z__ng and zoning
commission and the city counciJ_ hsve he_e. the required
hearings in +.he_nit.al process, there a ao need to be,~~n
the process anew. -
Question 5. If the chances ir. thr--~ coy:*±orehensive plan
as a resu'~t of °he annexation are ma+er.a1_ mangos, must the
planning and zonira commission hol..d two hearings?
Again, we refer to the '_.ar.guage of Idaho Code
§ 67-65C~~ (a) . It indicatr-,~s that:
The planning and coning conunission,
prior to recom..nerding the pl,~:i,
amer~~dment or repeal of the plan to the
govern_ng, board, sha7_'_ cc;_duct at least
one (1) nubli_e :nearing Follow_ ng
the commission hccrring, if the
commission. makes a. material chance in
__
-~--.. the plan £t•.rther not._ce .w~.d hearing
•
?'~,-E
shat- be ^rov;.ded. before-: the commission
Forwards t'^.e o].an with =-ts
recortmendat:_o:~_ to 'ire governing board.
?emphasis added?
<.bviously, if no material changes are made, ro further
hea.rir.c is necessary. ~r7e must asp>urie that any reco:7~m~:r~led
change in t'.^.e plan is a material charge. That, after a11,
_s the purpose of the ini`_ia1 public hearing--tc allow
public comment or any char,ae:- i n the ~: lan.
Idaho Code § 67-6509 ,a) is argua'oly susceptible to two
constructions. The first ~_s that a second hearing is
reeuired even thouch the mat:eriai change is precisely the
subiect matter of .the notice fe.r, and discussion at, the
initial meetir.a_. The second and better construction follows.
If, r„fter t_:e hearing, the commis~-=.on decides to make
changes which were not addressed ire. ._".e notice material of
the hearing and they amount to a "r;'.aterial ci•anc_e," then the
commission must ho'-d an add=tior.al hearing to cive the
~ubla.c a^. o_oportu_r,ity to ce~^ment upon the new :naterir_.
That is the only reason to Nave a second 'gearing. The
initial proposals for charges in the comprehensive plan
obviously have bee^ discussed at the public hearin.c. If no
chances have bee!. mace s_n. _hose proposals, and those
proposals are recommended to the rover.^.ing board; there is
~o need to gave a.r. u~.dit9_ena.l ~ubl_c '.:tearing. Therefore, it
_s eur opin__-^__ __`_e.t =ne o^~_v ~~_me ±hat an additiona_ pudic
hearing iS ne _'CSSary dt t'_^e 'J. anninc a^'..'' ZOn~ng COT_P~.'sSlOn
level 1S 1f t.^_e D1aP.'1wnG an;~ '.On':n g C:Jmm15s10.^: ^1d:{es a
material c^.ance~n t'^.e proposals pr-_•sented at the first
Allb1iC hr r i .":q. T f n0 m.at2r 1a1 C ~?, ;4 S are maCle, n0
aC-~1.t'Ona~ .~:_,/ ..*`. C'..S ..C-`SSarV "r_'Ca r(.`.~e. ~'S Cf file nature Cf
the original .. '-'oposal.
The same ho.'_ds true for the city c:_~.nci'_. Although the
annexation may amo unt to a materia l c`a.anc~e in the
cempreher,.siveplan,
the subject of the
opportunity to comm so long
'_n itia_
ent arid. as thosa material changes were
hearing, t'_ze public had ar.
ne changes were made in the
proposals after t:,=_, ~irsi: ,.ing, a second.. hearing _., not
necessary.
The pr inci_p_e of ..._ ,!aa*ery cones'. *-•.rcticv; commonly knowr.
as t`, ru'_e of reasonable ,n ^rc.retz.tion favors r. ra'~ional
cad sensible resu'_'~. ~ _.'_Y?~ ~ ~ar-d , ,±_. + ^rv Cor.struc'~ i on
~ ~_5-12. The second interprets.° o'_ rE ~. the *!;re
se^.sible resu'_t and shou'_d arevai'_. As te:~re =ire no Idaho
Cases On POirit; t.~:15 C',;'. ^_Sti:J^. Of CCnStrUCtlCn, ~';OlJ2ver, Can
-only be es3lved w_th absolute certainty by a juc':.ci.a_
_ue±erm-cacti on.
ATTOR'~?`_'1' GE\Td''_?t"\`.. OFI~I".'~'
a. 7°
A~?T??OF.ITI~S CO'~ISSDER~D:
1. Case Law
Goff v. H.J.u. Co., 95 Idaho 837, 421 P.2d 661 (1974)
Strasser v. Ress, ib5 '<eb. 858, 87 N.W.2.d 619 (1954)
Wanaer v. 7e''~, 255 N.Y.S.2d 227, ~i~ Misc. 93 rlyr;5)
Boys .~. Lofa, ?~O ".2d 890 (C.tl. '_954'
2. Statutes
Ida'no Code § 67-6509, e*. seq.
Idaho Code § 67-6525
3. Other
Bailantyne's Law Dicti_onarv 78' {3d ed. '_969)
Sutherland, Statuterv Constr~;:ction § 45.12
- ~~~~
Dated this ~~ day of July, 1942.
ATTORNEY. GE"'?Rl..~
Statof <.daho
~, ~~
a _~~a~4
---L--
Daviu .~~ro ----
-
SIS'BY:
)
Deputy At.~uorney General
Chief, Local Gove_-nment Divis
RGR/t_
cc: Idaho Supreme Court
Idaho Supreme Court maw Lbran~,-
Idaho State Libra;~y
X98
r,
i ~ R
,.
OP.DINANCE N0. ~T/(/
AN ORDIA]ANCE SETTING FORTH THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF PiONEY NECESSPr" TO
BE RAISEp FROM TA:U/S ASSESSED ON THE TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE
CITY OF PUERIDIAN FOR THE YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1932, AND ENDING
SEPTEP4BER 30, 1933.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE D4AYOP. ArTD CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
P~TERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO:
Section 1. That there is hereby assessed upon all the
taxable property within the limits of the City of reridian, Ada.
County, Idaho, for all purposes for the year October 1, 1982,
to September 30, 1983, the following amount: PWO HUNDRED NiNETY••SI
THOUSAPJD, SEVEN HUNDRED TWELVE and NO/100 DOLI~nFS 0296,712,00),
,. •, , c
General Fund---------,, ~. -~, 712 , M
Section 2. WHEREAS, there is an emergency therefor, which
emergency is declared to exist, this Ordinance shall take effect
and be in force from and after its passage, approval, and publica-
tion by law.
PASSED by the City Council and approved by the ~Sa~~or of the
City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho this 7th day of September, 1982.
ATTEST:
pc: N.inutes
Ada County Auditor/Recorder
Secretan1 of State _
Sterling codifiers
P.IC "
State Tax Con¢nission
Ada County Tax Collector
APPROVED:
29~
ORDINANCE N0. 408
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXQQG AAID 2~1ING CEIZPAIN REAL PROPER'PY WHICH IS DF,S(,'R"CBED AS
BEING SITUATE IN THE SOLIPH HALF OF THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3
NORTH, RANC,E 1 EAST, B.M., ADA COUN'T'Y, IDAHO, ~ THE CITY OF MERIDIAN WHICH
PImPERTY IS ADJACENT AND CONTIGWUS ID THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO.
WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian have
concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to annex to the said
City real property which is described as follows:
A tract of land located in the South half of the Northwest Quarter of
Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 Fast, B.M., Ada County,"Ida`Yto,;more
particularly described as follows: _ -
Commencing at the brass cap marking the Southwest corner of sai3"NOrrhwe'st
Quarter of said Section 8, which is the Real Point of Beginning;-`thence=~
North 0°41'00" West 606.29 feet along the Westerly boundary of said
Northwest Quarter; thence North 89°19'00" East 182.73 feet to an iron:-pin
in the oentexline of an irrigation lateral; thence South 60°04'03".~Eas£
286.12 feet along the centerline of said irrigation lateral to an-iron pin;
thence South 0°41'00" East 457.90 feet to an iron pin on the South boundary
of said Northwest Quarter; thence South 88°57'50" West 429.00 feet along
Said South boundary of said Northwest Quarter to the Real Point of Beginning,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINID BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO:
Section 1. That the aforanentioned real property, which is described as
follows:
A tract of land located in the South half of the Northwest Quarter of
Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the brass cap marking the Southwest corner of said Northwest
Quarter of said Section 8, which is the Real Point of Beginning; thence
North 0°41'00" west 606.29 feet along the Westerly boundary of said
Northwest Quarter; thence North $9°19'00" East 182.73 feet to an iron pin
in the centerline of an irrigation lateral; thence South 60°04'03" East
286.12 feet along the centerline of said irrigation lateral to an iron pin;
thence South 0°41'00" East 457.90 feet to an iron pin on the South boundary
of said Northwest Quarter; thence South 88°57'50" West 429.00 feet along
said South boundary of said Northwest Quarter to the Real Point of Beginning.
Section 2. That the City Clerk shall cause one (1) Dopy of the legal
description and map which shall plainly and clearly designate the boundaries as
altered, to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the
State Tax Commission within 10 days following the effective date of this
ordinance.
Section 3. The above described property to be known as the T.TJCUST GE'OVE-
EAST PII~ ANNEXATION and to be zoned "D" Industrial is annexed to the City of
Meridian subject to the requirement that all Ordinances of the City of Meridian
be complied with by Petitioner for annexation.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
after its passage, approval and publication as required by law.
94
PASSID by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City
of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this 19th day of July 1982.
- ..~ ATl'FST:
-_ ~ .
Ci Clerk, La L remann
pc: Recorder 7.26.82
Ada County Assessor 7.26.82
State Tax Commissioner 7.26.82
Ala County Crnmissioners
Ada County Highway District
Ada County Tax Collector
Ada County Zoning Director
Ada Planning Association
Association of Idaho Cities
Central District Health
Idaho Power Co.
Idaho Survey & Rating Bureau, Inc.
Intermountain Gas Co.
Mountain Bell
Nampa-Meridian Irrigation
State Electrical Board
State highway Dept.
State Plimibing Board
Sterling Codifiers
Ada County Bldg, Dept. Director
Union Pacific Corp.
U.S. Dept. of Com~~rce
U.S. Post Office, M:sidian, Idaho
J-U-B Engineers, Inc.
City Minutes
File
Applicant
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEI' •
A Good Place to Ldve
I CITY OF MERIDIAN
LAWANAL. NIEMAN
NLCity Clerk
A. M. KIEBERT, Treasurer
RICHARD D. NICHOLS, Chlel of Pollca 728 Meridian $trBet
BRUCE D. BTDART, Water WOrks Supt. MERIDIAN IDAHO
JOHN 0. FITZGERALD, Attorney 33842
ROGER WELKER, Fira Chiel
EARL WARD, Waste Water Supl. Phoge 8H6-0433
JOSEPH L. GLAISYER
Maroc
July 28, 1982
Re: Correction of Ordinance Ntunber
Previously Mailed to You as Ordinance No. 407:
First Church of Christ Annexation
COUNCILMEN
GRANT P. KINGSFORD
BILL BREWER
RICHARD F. ORTON, JR.
RONALD R. TOLSMA
ANNETTE C. HINRICHS
Chairman Zoning & Planning
AN ORDINANCE ANNE}CING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS
DESCRIBED AS BEING SITUATE IN THE SOUPH HALF OF THE NW QUPSiTER
OF SFX`PION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., ADA COUNTY,
IDAHO, TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN WHICH PROPERTY IS ADJACENT AND
CONTIGUOUS ~ THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO.
Has been published as Ordinance No. 408.
Please change your records accordingly.
pc: Ada County Assessor
State Tax Calmissioner
Prla County Cam~issioners
Ada County Highway District
Ada County Tax Collector
Acla County Zoning Director
Ada Planning Association
Association of Idaho Cities
Central District Health
CIM2
Idaho Pacer Co.
Idaho Survey & Rating Bureau, Inc.
Intermountain Gas Co.
Mountain Bell
Nampa-Meridian Irrigation
State Electrical Board
State Highway Dept.
State Plumbing Board
Sterling Codifiers
Ada County Bldg. Dept. Director
Union Pacific Corp.
U.S. Dept. of Caanerce
U.S. Post Office, Meridian, Idaho
J-U-B Engineers, Inc.
City Minutes
File
Applicant
HLT OE '_'RE~ISURE JALLEY
' - A .Good Place to L.iva !
~. ~.
OFFICIALS ¢/'1~R!~~ 1 ,g/~,4 7S'`~, ~T5 T COUNCILMEN I
~' ~` UWANAL NIEMANN, City Clrrk "mat g ~ "V' ~a~:~.~ GRANT P. 1(INGBFORD -
`.A.M.KIEBERT,Treeeurer BILLBREWER Q
• RICNARD D. NICNOIS, CNlel of Pollge X28 l~'_O_*.'d!&R ~a*^eCt RICHARD F.ORTON, JR. _ ~
,' BRUCE D, BTUART,Weler WOrke Supt. MEF.=~.'A'1, IDAI-IC RONALD R. TOLSMA j
` JOHN O. FlT2GERA'_D, HttomeY `33at2 ANNETTE C. HINRICHS
ROGER WELKER, F!re Cnlef
EARL WARD, WArte Weter Supt PSpne RU^.4433 Cnrtrman ZoningaPirnninq
}OSF.PF L. O`.APSYL~R Nuyor'
Jtaiy 28, 1982
k
M
Re: Correction of Orc?is~ance'ltmuer
~ The]ma,
As per phone conversation 7-28-82 please find enclosed Ordinance e
to be re-reco?-cied as Ordinance Nt~ttber 408. a
{d
f
This is to be re-recorded to correct Ordinance NLUnbes to _408. g
It has been published as Orc?i.nance 408. 6
.. i !
i Y.
y~ i
YY~- \~'~~uI
~T'
1 t s City of Mericlz.an
,a pc: File
~~ t J ..
A
'f
s
k
~r .,~.
~' 1
r
r ~_c _