Loading...
1980 08-18 AGENDA Meridian City Council August 18, 1980 ITEM: Minutes of previous meetings - July 21, 1980 and August 4, 1980 APPROVED. 1. Kenneth Westby - Determination for Conditional Use Bicycle Repair Shop, 234 E. 2nd St. APPROVED. 2. Settlers Village - Preliminary Protective Covenants - TABLED. 3. lJarren Shepard - heridian Boats - Sewer Charge Complaint - APPROVED sewer charge adjustment. 4. Auditor Discussion - Appointed Ernst & 4Jhinney CPA, as City Auditor for fiscal year 1980-1981. 5. Tentative Budget - Resolution #74. APPROVED. 6. Sewer District south of freeway - Larry Ripley, Jim Potter, Gordon Harris. 7. Bills were APPROVED. 8, hirs. Jean Czechowski, 1424 W. 1st St. - Trash charge exemption to be reviewed by Board of Appraisers. 9. Department Reports. 10. Engineering. 11. Tom McCartney, 1516 Elm Place - undrinkable water - no coliform bacteria. 12. Water/Sewer/Trash pre-termination hearing (Delinquency) 13. Other Business. Meridian City Hall August 18, 1980 Regular Council meeting called to order by P•layor Joseph Glaisyer at 7:32 p.m. Councilmen present: Richard Williams, Grant Kingsford, Bill Brewer, Rick Orton Jr. Others present: Bruce Stuart, Roger Welker, Earl Ward, Jim Potter, Vern Schoen, Norman Fuller, Glen Scott, Larry Ripley, Gary Smith, Gordon Harris, Gene Martin, Tom McCartney, Warren Shepard, Terry P. Smith, Steve Gratton, Jean Czechowski, Patsy Leach, Robert Davis, Olive Davis, John IJ. Coo knell, Ray Sotero, Bill Blankinship. Minutes of previous meetings held July 2_l, 1980 and Aguust 4, 1980 were approved as read. Agenda 1 Kenneth Westby - Conditional Use Bicycle Repair Shop - 234 E. 2nd St. Hearing was held August 4, 1980. Because of a lack of quorum, determination was called for at this time. Attorney Crookston explained the procedure as Westby could not be present for deter- mination. Mrs. Westby had presented the conditional use request and hearing was conducted by President of Council, :•lilliams. There were no comments from the public Williams reviewed the public hearing request and recommended the request be granted. The Motion was made by Williams and seconded by Brewer that the conditional use for a Bicycle Shop, Kenneth llestby, 234 E. 2nd St, be granted. Motion Carried: Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea; Brewer, yea; Orton, ,yea. Agenda 2 Settlers Village - Protective Covenants Bill Blankinship, architect, representing the owners Dimeo-Gordon Enterprises, Aloha, Oregon presented covenants stating: "The only changes are in reference to the water wells and sewage," (Page 7 and 8, Section 14 and 15) adding, "and the City of Meridian," after, "Idaho Department of Public Health." Blankinship stated that a blanket article of incorporation of Settlers Village Business Association has been drawn up and the owners have also requested that a blanket corporate body for the residential section which would not take effect, but available if they wanted it. Blankinship explained the background of the Village has been setting for three or more years, the previous covenants authorized 4-plexes, 6,000 sq. ft. lots were not workable, also one half of the section was zoned commercial, in other words, the previous cove- nants are not usuable. The preliminary covenants presented at this time has a pro- vision to take care of the park. Piayor Glaisyer stated he will meet with Blankinship, the APA Board, HUD, and FHA on Wednesday at 2:00 p.m. to discuss this development. He will report back to the Council after this meeting. Brewer questioned the ground floor area, the possibility of less than two-car garages, the minimum cost of $42,000. Blankinship explained this was put in covenants for protective measures, put in as "minimum" for house, and cost and write in phrase, "as of the filing of these covenants." That "minimum" would escalate along with the normal inflation cycle so that they wouldn't be out of date. The one-car garage is intended, plus off street parking, as they do not look for large families. The units vary, 1200 to 1600 sq. ft. under roof. (Page 4, Section 3 of Covenants) Theme type concept, all the homes would be a type and the commercial section a con- tinuation of that type. The fence, landscaping could be of a Spanish theme, the roof, common wall, permanent and fire proof . The Motion was made by Orton and seconded by Williams that the Preliminary Covenants as presented for Settlers Village be tabled until the next regular meeting. Motion Carried: Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea; Brewer, yea; Orton, yea. Meridian Citv Hall Agenda 3 l4arren Shepard - Meridian Boats 8. 1980 Shepard stated that he has sold his business of Meridian Boats and no longer owns the building at 331 E. 1st St. He was before the Council to report the problem of the washing of boats, plus the rainy season, there has been puddling with no walk- way. Shepard stated that his sewer charge has had a 1,500q increase and contended this was not justified with only one toilet and two employees. There was much discussion concerning an adjustment of Meridian Boats sewer charge. Williams stated that he appreciated both the city's and Shepard's position and that there will have to be changes made before that building can be used again. The drainage problem would be the ACHD and State Highway's responsibility. Williams recommended the minimum residential rate per month for 11 months to settle the bill, but that is not a Question for the next owner because the building will have to be brought up to code. He questioned the building inspector if this was correct. Building inspector agreed. The Motion was made by Orton and seconded by Kingsford to adjust the Meridian Boats sewer charge for 11 months to the minimum residential rate totaling $48.40. Motion Carried: Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea; Brewer, yea; Orton, yea. Agenda 4 Mayor Glaisyerappointed Ernst & Whinney CPA, as City Auditor for the fiscal year of 1979-1980; estimated fee $5,200 to $6,200. The Motion was made by 4Jilliams and seconded by Kingsford to approve Ernst 1.4 Whinney CPA, as the City Auditor for the fiscal ,year of 1980-1981. Motion Carried: Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea; Brewer, yea; Orton nay. Agenda 5 The mayor read Resolution #74 entitled: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF AN ESTIMATE OF THE EXPENSES FOR ALL PURPOSES FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 1980, AND ENDING THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1981, AND GIVING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PRIOR TO THE PASSAGE OF THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATION BILL. Mayor Glaisyer called for public comment at this time. There was none. The Motion was made by Brewer and seconded by Kingsford that the rules and provisions of 50-9002 and all rules and provisions requiring that Resolutions be read on three different days, be dispensed with and that Resolution Number 74, as read, be passed and approved. Motion Carried: Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea; Brewer, yea; Orton, yea. Agenda 6 Larry Ripley - Sewer District Ripley who is a member of Elam & Burke Law Firm explained his presence, by invitation of Jim Potter, to outline the advantages and disadvantages of a sewer district pro- viding part of an effluent service for Meridian and surrounding area. Nis firm represents the N/W Sewer District in Boise, and the ldest Boise Sewer District. He has also assisted other entities throughout the State of Idaho in exploring the feasibility of forming sewer districts. Ripley stated that the land that is not in an improved state, there would be no worry of dispute, as Boise has become involved in. Ripley stated, "Basically what we have here, as I understand it, is that the City of Meridian, for various reasons, seems reluctant to provide sewer service to that area." (south of freeway). "By reluctant, I mean you have the problems of finance, what particular area do you have pre-treatment problems, administrative problems, etc. Basically, a sewer district removes those problems and at the same time gives you the same amount of control that you have always had. The reason for that is you control the treatment plant and by controlling the treatment plant, you have the ability to dictate the terms of the contract that the hypothetical sewer district would have to enter into with the City of Meridian for it's treatment. In this particular instance, Meridian City Hall .3. August 18, 1980 there is also the problem of water, and the same thing can apply there. You can form a sewer district or a water district or both. The city does not really lose any control of the area by a formation of a district. The Supreme Court, as well as other jurisdications, has recognized that a sewer district isn't really a "municipality", but a "special political subdivision", created fora very limited purpose - that is treat- ment of effluent or providing water service. In a contract, the city could dictate the total amount of effluent that the city is willing to accept into transmission lines - the meeting point would be metered. The city could require such things as pre-treatment, set the rates and charges for the entire district." Williams stated, "You (Ripley) made a statement earlier that is erroneous. I would like to correct it for the record. The statement you made 'that the city does not desire to enter into that area for sewage' - our city ordinances require that developments within the city limits of Meridian hook onto the city's municipal sewer system, it also requires that the developer pay for, and come to, existing trunk lines in order to provide service." Ripley agreed to this as being common practice. He stated, "The courts and other juris- dictions have ruled that you satisfy that ordinance by the creation of a sewer district. The city, through it's zoning powers, has the ability to dictate the fact that a parcel of property will not be improved and have structures on it unless it is connected for cen- tralized sewer or water, but the courts have said that requirement is satisfied if indeed it is hooked to a centralized sewer, and in this particular instance would require a contract between the sewer district and the City of Meridian for the treatment of the effluent because you control the treatment facilities." Ripley stated,"The advantages to the sewer district are as many as the drafters of the " contract between the city and the hypothetical sewer district. You can require such things as if the sewer district would not desire to provide service to a particular area that the city desired to serve, but you had in between our area that the sewer district didn't desire to serve and the City of Meridian, the sewer district, then the contract could require that the sewer district, fora transportation charge of the effluent would transport the effluent of a particular area that the City of Meridian desired. I look on a sewer district as being a vehicle by which you can finance a very large expansion of an existing municipality sewer system. The way in which a sewer district is financed, is a bond election in which all of the individuals within the sewer district vote, and incumber the property of that sewer district through advalorem taxes." Ripley went through how one sewer district is formed: "Circulate petitions, file with the district court, court review legal documents, determine whether or not it will certify for election, hold an election and it's formed, then the the city can negotiate the con- tract. If the city did not desire a particular provision in the contract, then you would know that prior to the time that you have passed the bond election, because it would be essential to have a treatment contract with the City of Meridian before you ever have a bond election." Ripley stated, "The disadvantage is that the municipality does not have its personnel working that area - it's the sewer districts. The sewer district is required to provide all the necessary services as far as maintenance in that sewer district." Orton asked, "How do we enforce payment?" Ripley answered, "Sue under contract; power to disconnect; the Board of Directors of the sewer district would have to be extremely redicent to have gotten in that position. EPA must approve of the contract and require rates and charges meet approval of the city and EPA." Orton asked, "Can we contract the maintenance and operation of the line the sewer district might build?" Ripley answered, "You can go further than that, you can contract with the sewer district and they handle the billing." Orton asked, "Is it realistic that a sewer district for this particular area can sell bonds at this point in time?" Ripley answered, "Yes, when a sewer district sells its bonds, it's a general obligation bond backed by the value of the property within that area. A revenue bond carries a higher rate of interest." Orton asked, "Earl, do we have a local industrial cost recovery?" Earl ldard stated, "We could be covered under the minor or major contributing industry cost recovery." Meridian City Hall .4. August 18, 1980 Williams stated, "We are working on that ordinance now." The federal Cost Recovery was discussed. Ripley stated, "You could provide that there would be a contract for service for X number of years, now you have to peg the years to the point where the bond holder would be satisfied that he's got a place for that sewage to be treated, but at the end of a particular period of time, you could provide that the parties agree that an election will be held as to whether or not to disband the district. You can provide for an election." Kingsford asked, "What in the contract for the city pre-determines the boundaries, what if there was a portion the city did not want to service? Can this be included in the contract?" Ripley answered, "On a limited basis you could. The powerful tool you have is to limit the amount of effluent that you will permit the sewer district to discharge. At the time the city applied for the grants upon construction you provided a treatment area, EPA will look with a ,jaundiced eye if you go outside that aFea and deprive another portion within that plan." Brewer asked, "This district could go way outside the limits of the city?" Ripley answered, "The legal ability of the district? That's correct, but you could limit very sharply the ability of the district to do that by limiting the effluent." The mayor called for comments. Brewer stated, "We have been a year and a half trying to get sewer and water across that freeway, we apparently lost two or three interested industrial promoters." Mayor Glaisyer asked, "Who did we lose?" Brewer answered, "Williamson Trucking, the Plastic Co.- we might have lost them for other reasons, but we have several developments, Mar-Mon and other interested people trying to sign tennants - this seems the closest and most reasonable solution so far. I've thought for a year and a half that there has to be a solution. This isn't it exactly, but it is maybe the cleanest sounding I've heard so far, other than trying to wait twenty years for politics, money, to clear the way - and the possibility of the city being able to do it." Orton stated, "In the formation stages, basically the petition has to be passed by the landowners and then that goes to the court, the court certifies it, then there is an election. Where does the city come in?" Ripley answered, "It doesn't." Orton asked, "Then they can form this district without either our approval or endorsement?" Ripley answered, "Yes, but I'll tell you, if the city is not interested in entering into a contract for the treatment of the effluent, then they may pursue sewer districts, but they will do it without me." Orton stated, "Go back to the financial aspects of the districts versus LID's. What might the terms and the rate of interest be?" Ripley answered, "I can't tell you that - all I know is that a GO Bond carries the lowest rate of interest because, (a) it's tax exempt, (b) it's backed by advalorem taxation which Wall Street still thinks real property is the best security you can have for bonds." Orton, adressing the audience, "Do the people on the south side of the highway all support the concept of a sewer district to get the sewer and water lines across there, are you unified?" John Cooknell stated, "I can only speak for Mar-Mon Tower Plaza Associates. I must correct Mr. Ripley - the City Council has at no time ever been reluctant to build or fund sewer or water south of the freeway - they were never asked, as it was not their respon- sibility. The whole object, as far as my firm is concerned, is how a group of neighbors could solve financing getting the water and sewer extention south of the freeway and we looked at LID procedure, it has many advantages, but many encumberances on the city - we looked at Latecomers Ordinances and we are currently looking at the sewer district. From the discussion I've had with other members of the Gateway South Sewer Association over the last year and a half, is that we are looking for an equitable method to finance the project, that will be acceptable to the city and that we can work with in harmony." Orton asked, "Do you feel the sewer district will provide that?" Cooknell answered, "Sewer District has some tremendous advantages, after talking to Mr. Ripley, and his associate the other day at lunch, it has certain advantages we are not presently facing, but may face in the future. If we have a situation whereby it is the difference between adequate water pressure and/or sewer service, such as a new well or ,5, August 18, 1980 another extension underneath the freeway to form a loop. A sewer district could do those things, whereby if an individual landowner or two landowners get together and take the sewer and water across the freeway and then the next development comes up, or the city desires it, then they have to figure out how they are going to punch that loop or well. It (sewer district) is a financing vehicle that allows landowners who have a lot of money in land and not a lot in the bank to be able to finance a municipal extension. I person- ally like the sewer district in that it does allow the city to control and I think the landowners involved are committed to city control and in making this thing work as the city plans it's growth.. As far as vae (P1ar-Mon Developers) are concerned, we are looking for an equitable way to finance the way amongst ourselves." Marty Igo stated, "I have an agency role with Winston Moore who owns 21 acres in the area you are referring to -and I can't accept the last point you made in which you (Ripley) assumed acceptance. I stand reluctantly, but I have to state I don't believe Mr. Moore has made a position specifically. Ne has asked me to attend these meetings for infor- mation. I can only reiterate what Mr. Moore has said here publically, and that is he bought the property understanding that for any planned commercial development that he will construct on the property, he will provide sewer and water to that - he bought it with that understanding. Mr. Moore further understands he may have to do that himself for his own project, however, it's been the last year that he's been involved in the property, he's been wanting to cooperate with the property owners in that area to do some- thing that is fair and equitable along with those property owners, but specifically some- thing in the best interest of the city - that, I think has been his position consistently. I do knova when Per. Moore takes a posistion, whether it be Latecomers Ordinance, LID, or Sewer District, he will support the position himself personally." Orton stated, "I would like to see the city endorse the concept and give them whatever cheerleading or back vatting they need to get it done because the ball is still in your court. I'd go a step further, I'd support the latecomers concept also, I don't know which could be worked out quicker with less problem, but I do think to the extent that neither of those impair our financial situation, nor do I think we lose control. I believe we should extend whatever we can extend alono that line." Kingsford stated, "I would like to see us, not necessarily support it at this point, but research it through our staff, city attorney, engineer, AIC, and so forth. I would like to know if there are more drawbacks." Williams stated, "We are at a situation of approximately 8,000 population, which means we are almost one-third capacity of our existing facility. N!e have substanial undeveloped area that's annexed which may entail another population equivalent of eight to ten thousand people. If that's the case with the existing city boundaries, we may well be close to capacity to that sewage treatment facility, which has got to last us another twenty years. Without any way at this point to fund expansion of it because EPA has said no way if we use this just to promote growth. And that assumes that no industry is going to come into town - that's with residential population which these areas all encompass now. If we have a sewer district that forms in the south area, all of a sudden, of an undetermined size which may go to Eagle Rd, or may go to Victory Rd, we may find ourselves, when a viable industry does come into Meridian and says we've got land at Franklin and Linder right on the track - we're going to say we don't have the capacity and you'll have to go to Nampa or Boise. I think before we get any expansions at this point of time, we better have a good idea where we stand, because I have a feeling with the annexed land we're borderline in letting anyone else in, let alone a sewer district that may encompass 1,200 or more acres." Kingsford stated, "It was my understanding we could limit this." Williams stated, "Before we proceed, we had better take a very good inventory of what we're using, what we are committed to, ifareas outside of that were encompassed. into the district, I would be very hesitant - I support more the latecomers charge." Orton stated, "I think. that knowing where we are at in terms how much we've obligated our treatment plant is a good question - it has got to be read in numbers, whether we know the capacity or not, we should know where we're at. But on the issue of rebuilding or expanding the plant, there is no statutory requirement when we do that, we can do that next year if we can find the money - there's financial limitations. If next year there were 21,000 people hooked up to our sewer system, our revenues would be instead of X385,000, about a million dollars - six years and we would have some money to do some financing with. I think that's the whole philosophy behind our user charge system at this time. I have every faith it will work if inflation doesn't gobble us up. Second point Dick, the 21,000 capacity does consider a mix of residential and commercial." Williams stated, "Right, it was, but it still is equivalency basis" Orton stated, "Yes, it's true." Pleridian City Hall .6. Auqust 18 1980 Jim Potter stated, "I think it's important to know that the people out here have recognized that there is a certain capacity allowable to that area and they have evidenced their desire in this intentional contract between this hypothetical sewer district and the city. We even allow fora clause that once the city engineer and our engineer have the opportunity to sit down and to reduce the residential equivalencies to treatment perimeters, that the people of the district were formed would be agreeable to a clause which said that the district would be limited to those perimeters unless the district were able to fund proper expansion to the city plant. Again, limits the boundary, it limits what goes on out there, not only in size, but in type. Thank you." Mayor Glaisyer stated, "I might add, that from my own standpoint, and I think I speak for the Council, that something does come up that it's a progressive and not quote "hearsay" that this Council might be a little more lenient and more progressive in trying to work something out. I have been here for three years and all I hear is I'm here to help the city and if something does come up and somebody is actually going to take the property over and develop into a complex that's going to be beneficial to the city, then I think you would see a substantial change - we have not seen that. lde have been waiting for Ptar-Mon fora year and a half." Potter stated, "P~1ayor, unfortunately I can't address that because I'm working for a number of people out there." t4ayor Glaisyer stated, "Well, Kddaks going to be here, Texas Instruments - when something becomes concrete, you will see the Council be more progressive." Orton stated, "Joe maybe you weren't speaking for the whole Council on that issue because there are properties all over this town that has suffered in this recession and some for considerably more than three years - Crestwood,Nahas, Cherry Lane Village." The mayor called for more comments. There were none. The bills were read. Date Purpose Amount 7-31-80 J-U-B Engineers Engineers 3,553.13 7-31-80 Farmers and Merchants State Bank 200,000.00 7-31-80 .Sanitary Service Service 810.00 7-31-80 Idaho First National Bank 14,409.84 7-31-80 Brent Lee Alger Recreation 727.60 7-31-80 Douglas Brigham Recreation 223,46 7-31-80 Bradley L. Brooks Recreation 241.81 7-31-80 Monte L. Brooks Recreation 250.44 7-31-80 Kevin A. Crofts Recreation 250.44 7-31-80 Kip Eric Crofts Recreation 250.44 7-31-80 Tamera Lynn Fricke Recreation 105.79 7-31-80 Beverly M. Hendrey Recreation 554.76 7-31-80 Juidth L. Larsen Recreation 56.32 7-31-80 Idaho First National Bank 26,265.00 7-31-80 Dorrine C. Mitchell Recreation 107.95 7-31-80 Terri Ann Moore Recreation 187.83 VOID 7-31-80 Lynette Hope Pincock Recreation 113.35 7-31-80 Kendall L. Thurston Recreation 236.41 7-31-80 Jason A. Ulibarri Recreation 21.59 7-31-80 Russell C. Winter Recreation 25.91 7-31-80 James W. Witt Recreation 263.40 7-31-80 Carrie L. Wood Recreation 113.35 7-31-80 Meridian Insurance Insurance 9,4$5.00 7-31-80 Connie A. Pattis Recreation 154.37 7-31-80 U.S. Post Office Postage 73.00 7-31-80 Norman Woody Williams Police 878.05 7-31-80 Bruce D. Stuart Works 992.07 7-31-80 Idaho First National Bank 20,306.51 7-31-80 Gary Smith Engineer 1.00 7-31-80 Joseph L. Glaisyer Mayor 535.20 7-31-80 Bill G. Brewer Councilman 8].70 7-31-80 Grant Paul Kingsford Councilman 89.20 7-31-80 Rick Orton Councilman 89.20 7-31-80 Richard Williams Councilman 89.20 7-31-80 LaWana L. Niemann City Clerk 874.82 7-31-80 Mary Jane Breshears Clerk Typist 586.49 7-31-80 Tamera Perkins Clerk Typist 414.83 7-31-80 Judy Ann Byers Clerk Typist 418.80 ._,..e.:...v~.,,.~s. _:..~ ~: • ~ Meridian City Hall .7. C~ 7-31-80 Lynette Peters Clerk Typist 428.16 7-31-80 John 0. Fitzgerald Attorney 148.58 7-31-80 Roger Sherwin Police Chief 900.58 7-31-80 Jean E. Moore Clerk Typist 532.14 7-31-80 Rick L. Richardson Police 816.73 7-31-80} Dennis James Estes Police 812.06 7-31-80 Kevin Dale Robertson Police 7II8.60 7-31-80 Terry L. Tipton Police 837.87 7-31-80 Mark S. Shaver Police 685.13 7-31-80 Gene N. Trakel Police 729.93 7-31-80 Richard Doug Nichols Police 943.81 7-31-80 Jim Williston Police 762.45 7-31-80 Carol A. Case Police 46.93 7-31-80 Jerome 0. Payne Police 112.64 7-31-80 Terry Pollard Police 103.26 7-31-80 Chuck Scott Police 122.03 7-31-80 Alfred P.. Thorusen Police 145.50 7-31-80 Charles Younger Police 136.11 7-31-80 Richard P. Donahue Dog Catcher 500.06 7-31-80 Roger L, Welker Fire Chief 198.61 7-31-80 Raymond Lee Voss Fire Marshall 748.59 VOID 7-31-80 Dewey Richard Davis Works 774.92 7-31-80 Mark Louis Aguirre Works 748.78 7-31-80 Gregory B. Walker 4Jorks 574.86 7-31-80 Carol Schultz Clerk Typist 328.76 7-31-80 Ann M. Kiebert Treasurer 716.07 7-31-80 Lana Sue Roberts Clerk Typist 519.89 7-31-80 Elaine Town Clerk Typist 422.84 7-31-80 Judy M. Blessing Clerk Typist 231.57 7-31-80 Earl Ward Wastewater 1,104.81 7-31-80 Robert Keith Boyd Wastewater 829.67 7-31-80 Frederick H. Putzier Wastewater 683.05 7-31-80 Dan D. Grogg Wastewater 737.50 7-31-80 Kris K. Jennison Wastewater 623.59 7-31-80 Robert L. Parsons Jr. Wastewater 711.40 7-31-80 Idaho First National Bank 4,142.82 7-31-80 U.S. Post Office Postage 247.39 7-31-80 Vern Schoen Bldg, Insp. 1,139.90 7-31-80 farmers and Merchants State Bank 3,845.90 7-31-80 Jim Bentley, Jr. 200.00 7-31-80 Social Security Trust fund 4,632.32 7-31-80 City of Meridian 21.45 7-31-80 State of Idaho 1,036.95 7-31-80 QUR Meridian 220.00 7-31-80 Fuller Construction 16.85 7-31-80 First Security -City of Pteridian 8,954.95 7-31-80 Association of Idaho Cities 1,821,61 7-31-80 Colonial Insurance Insurance 646.90 7-31-80 Ace Hardware Supplies 40.93 7-31-80 Ada County Utility Coordinating Corrmittee 5.00 7-31-80 Amfax Electric Supply Co. Supplies 70.37 7-31-80 Baird Oil Company 77,94 7-31-80 Big 0 Tires Supplies 139.73 7-31-80 Bill's 66 Service 190.39 7-31-80 Bodine Oil Compnay, Inc. 2,268.00 7-31-80 Boise Cascade Building Materials Center Supplies 16.99 7-31-80 Brewer Pest Control Service 8.50 7-31-80 Central Office Equipment Supplies 25.40 7-31-80 City of Boise 425.65 7-31-80 City of Meridian 112.45 7-31-80 Consolidated Supply Co. Supplies 2.21 7-31-80 Culligan Supplies 1.05 7-31-BO Day Timers Supplies 14.92 7-31-80 Dixon Paper Co. Supplies 94.86 7-31-80 Don's Shell Service 4.70 7-31-80 Farm Store Supplies 184,60 7-31-80 Farmer Brothers Supplies 44.85 7-31-80 Foodtown _ - 18.80 7-31-80 G&B Sand and Gravel Supplies 72.82 7-31-80 Harold's Electric Supplies 338.75 ~ Meridian City Hall 8. 1980 7-31-80 Hoff Building Center Supplies 176.28 7-31-80 Ice Skating & Co. Recreation 169.00 7-31-80 Idaho Camera Supplies 215.00 7-31-80 Idaho Power Co. Service 7,216.88 7-31-80 Idaho Sporting Goods Supplies 226.25 7-31-80 Intermountain Gas Co. Service 38.09 7-31-80 IBM Office Products Division Supplies 58.50 7-31-80 J&D Printing Supplies 6.00 7-31-80 Kalbus Office Supply Supplies 258.88 7-31-80 Kaman Bearing Supplies 307.11 VOID 7-31-80 Lewis & Clark Paper and Supply, Inc. Supplies 53.80 7-31-80 Lowery - Miller Co. Supplies 24.85 7-31-80 teridian Drug Supplies 49.46 7-31-80 Meridian Ford Sales Police 313.99 7-31-80 Meridian Lock & Key Supplies 4.80 7-31-80 Meriidan Surge Service Supplies 9.60 7-31-80 Missman Electric Company Supplies 180..52 7-31-80 Modern Printers Supplies 264.35 7-31-80 Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. Supplies 56.17 7-31-80 Motorala,Inc. Fire 1,314.50 7-31-80 Mountain Bell Telephone Service 485.88 7-31-80 Mountain View Equipment Company Supplies 2.22 7-31-80 National ChemSearch Wastewater 88.46 7-31-80 National Industrial Supply Supplies 23.79 VOID 7-31-80 Paul's Conoco 134.40 7-31-30 Perma-Green Lawn Co. Supplies 87.50 7-31-80 Radio Paging Service Service 42.00 7-31-80 S&E Auto Parts Supplies 378.68 7-31-80 Sheehan's Supplies 5.00 7-31-80 Sprouse-Reitz Supplies 4.54 7-31-80 Star Photo Service Supplies 6.21 VOID 7-31-80 Tel-Car, Inc. Service 39.75 7-31-80 Tolsma Welding & Repair Service 11.00 7-31-80 Valley News Service 402.52 7-31-80 Vangas Supplies 96.60 7-31-80 VWR Scientific Inc. Supplies 229.07 7-31-80 Co-Tem Corporation Supplies 33.OD 7-31-80 Zamzows Supplies 29.65 7-31-80 Public Employee Retirement System 4,977.03 7-31-80 Datafax Business Equipment Supplies 343.00 7-31-80 State of Idaho Dept. of Labor & Industrial 383.40 7-31-80 Tate Rental Supplies 83.43 7-31-80 Water & lastewater Equipment Co. Supplies 1,162.84 7-31-80 Dyna Systems Supplies 72.30 7-31-80 G & B Ready hlix Supplies 156.14 7-31-80 Harold's Electric Supplies 204.00 7-31-80 Idaho Department of Health and Welfare 112.50 The Motion was made by Williams and seconded by Kingsford that the bills be allowed. Motion Carried: Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea; Brewer, yea; Orton, yea. Mrs. Jean Czechowski, 1424 W. 1st St. Williams stated this rental unit has been vacant about a year now, water and sewer is being used to keep the lawn green. They have not been putting any trash out. Letter is on file with these minutes directed to Williams from Mrs. Czechowski. There was much discussion concerning the city ordinance of mandatory trash pick up. Mrs. Czechowski's status was discussed. It was the feeling of the Council as a matter of policy to not change, as the determin- ation of garbage charge was made by economy scale, administration, control of policies. Meridian Citv Hall .9. August 18, 1980 Czechowski stated this was very unjust in her case and another burden. She wanted her water service left on for yard care, but there is never any trash pick up. This house has been empty since August, 1979, but was not charged trash service until June, 1980 upon adoption of Sanitary Service policy. There was much discussion and dsagreerhent. The P1otion was made by Kingsford and seconded by Brewer that the Board of Adjusters review the request of P4rs. Jean Czechowski, 1424 ld. 1st St, for trash charge exemption. Motion Carried: Kingsford, yea; Brewer, yea; Orton, yea; Williams, nay. Agenda 9 Department Reports: Building Inspector Vern Schoen reported that Meridian Park Subdivision had presented a letter of request to begin construction of three model homes on Lots 15, 16 JY 17, Block 4 prior to final approval of subdivision improvements. Letter stated there will be no sewer or water hookups until all improvements are completed and approved. Letter on file with these minutes. Stuart, Works Superintendent, presented letter of items that will have to be done before water can be hooked up to any lots. Letter in file with these minutes. There were no other objections to allow early construction of the three lots in Meridian Park Subdivision. Schoen also stated he needed Council recommendation that someone is to build 1,086 sq. ft., but claims an unfinished space of 264, which would total the 1,350 sq. ft. policy - and someone with 800 sq. ft. of floor space, maybe a thousand, but the balance in unfinished basement. Mayor stated this is not allowed and is not the intent. Williams questioned sign at Home Federal. Schoen is to investigate. Agenda 10 Engineering: Smith presented a bill from Union Pacific Railroad Co. for temporary construction site, Phase III, EDA, agreement signed February 6, 1978. The Motion was made by Kingsford and seconded by Williams to allow payment to Union Pacific Railroad Co. for temporary construction site, Phase III, EDA in the amount of $62.50. Motion Carried: Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea; Brewer, yea; Orton, yea. Smith recommended payment of the following reimbursable bills from the construction account: Wastewater treatment plant Evergreen Sprinkler Supply Co. $ 16.45 Instrumentation Specialties Co. 1,63 1.00 Neptune Microfloc, Inc. 1 424.03 3,071.48 The Motion was made by Williams and seconded by Brewer to pay the bills from the con- struction account, Evergreen Sprinkler Supply Co., $16.45; Instrumentation Specialties Co, $1,631.00; and Neptune Microfloc, Inc., $1,424.03. Motion Carried: Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea; Brewer, yea; Orton, yea. i !- Meridian City Hall .10. August 18, 1980 The Motion was made by Brewer and seconded by Orton to transfer $3,071.48 from the General Fund to the Construction Fund. Motion Carried: Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea; Brewer, yea; Orton, yea. Smith presented General Engineering Statement No. 5 - 1980; April 26 through July 19, 1980. The Motion was made by Kingsford and seconded by Brewer to approve General Engineering Statement No. 5, J-U-6 Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $2,321.10. Motion Carried: Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea; Brewer, yea; Orton, yea. Agenda 11 Tom McCartney, 1516 Elm Place spoke concerning undrinkable water. PcCartney questioned the results of a water sample taken and how much longer he would have to haul water to drink. Stuart reported the water sample report was nocoliform bacteria. Orton stated that the flush valve, to correct this problem area, has been let out for contract and will notify McCartney. Agenda 12 The mayor called the pre-termination hearing open for delinquent accounts. There were no comments. Hearing closed. Agenda 13 Other Business: West Pine Construction was discussed. Orton recommended approval of the plans for W. Pine-Linder improvement by ACHD with the condition that all cost during that extention be ACHD responsibility. Brewer is to contact ACHD to settle cost issue. Orton presented Senior Citizen request for help from city in obtaining land for a center. He suggested the possibility of old sewer plant land - or to liquidate the land and use the funds to help. There was discussion concerning the compatible use of the old sewer plant land. Williams thought this might have some merit and perhaps work out a lease so that the city would hold this land. That land is not utilized now. Ward stated there would be extremely high demolition cost. The Motion was made by Kingsford and seconded by Brewer that the meeting be adjourned at 9:35 p.m. Motion Carried: Williams, yea; Kingsford~jea; Brewer, yea; Orton, yea. cc: Mayor & Council Planning and Zoning Hein Attorney Bruce Vernon Earl J-U-B Fire Chief Ada County Commissioners ACRD ADa County Zoning Director APA AIC Central District Health Nampa-Meridian Irrigation City Clerk Treasurer Ray Sctero -` i y Clerk • ~ ~ • Dorita Overton, 203 W. Idaho $ 48.85 Ted J. Nelson, 417 W. Broadway 64.50 Anthony J. Strong, 526 W. Pine 48.25 Patrick Minegar, 1102 W. Pine 51.35 Service Plumbing, 725 E. 2nd 125.20 Michael J. Schindel, 432 E. Pine 33.00 Ernest Lembke, 1412 E. 1st St. 98.80 Marty Roberts, 31 E. 4Jashington 21.80 Lee R. Todd, 1606 W. 2nd 39.05 Sam Johnson, 1501 ld. 2nd 83.55 Gary James, 1222 W. 4th 49.45 Edward M. Thomason Jr., 2105 N.W. 12th 74.05 Fireside Homes, Inc., 1980 Tana Ct. 33.05 Inland Development Co, 1661 Chateau Dr. 32.90 Jim Hugo, 1602 Todd Way 85.80 Fireside Homes, 2085 Kristen Way 31.90 Bud Katich, 2053 Kristen Way 17.90 Clinton Barnhart, 2580 Misty Dr. 74.75 Michael Davis, 2599 Rebbecca Way 70.10 P"ike Evans, 3350 Sugar Creek Dr. 41.75 Custom Builders, 1720 Interlachen Way 49.95 Arthur Conklon, 1990 Incline Way 56.25 Thomas Davis, 1990 Turnberry Way 107.65 Lynn Associates, 3787 Sugar Creek Dr. 108.95 Pat Cope, 25 S.W. 7th 61.50 C~ OFFICIALS : LAWANALNIEMANN, City Clerk. A. M. K!F.BERT, TVeaeurer RCOEfl $HEPW IN, CMe9 ai Police $FUCE D. STUART, Water Wot4e Supt. JOHM O. FITZtlERALD, Attorney ROOEP WELKER, Fire Chlaf EARL WARD, Weote Water SUpt. • HU73 OF TP.EASURE V~ILI_E1~ A Good Plaoe to Live Y f {~~T 'i28 Merid:cm Street METtIDIAN, IDAT-?O 33642 Phone 3339433 JOSEPH L. GLA!SYER Mayor COUNCILMEN RICHARD C. WILLIAMS GRANTR w:NGSFOBD BIL_ SvEWER RICHARD F. ORTON, JR. DONALD L. SHARP Ctt,lrman 2onlnp 8 M,nnlnp iragust 18,19'0 tvieridian Nark Sub, /= 1 Joseph Usier, :.ttorr_ey Subject: On request for er_rly constructuan o^ a,cde~. homes in ;<eridi.r;n Park Subdivision, Pre; phone converation 8-12-80, Their are sor.:e hers that wi11 h ve to be done on the subdiv.':_sion before waiver car. to heoled up to an;r Lot's, i,. 'a' City Hall Laoranz Itie.^.!a.nn Johnson 1sn,;, ito;r Johnson 9, Ch=_orine test- 3 tests fro';: sister.-., 2, Bacteria test- 6 testis from s~rstem, ~, Drawin3 0: w-ter ma..n crossiT~~ 5 n'.ile drei.n, with vrhat kind o° ;,.---t'.~er *•roof szrping & arwroves l:y t:hzt a,_;e:.c;• e: c~- I:erioi-n City n =-Weer, L;, ressure test on %]_aire ~~treet ~ro;a;, ~indsr Rozd to Darrah Drive, 5, All curb's, gutters, sidev;- ~~s ( navin~ s'~:r11 be done, 6, Ail :peter yo71s to be out of '.he ^^_^>,iaic ~ r=ter, ^, i~inal inspection shall l e: done cr, r=;~o~_e Sub- division water s;,rstem, Sincerely a-~ .. ~-'t ~'L' `' Bruce Stuart i<ieridiar. ='ublic forks JL'rt. • BDS/cls ~„ . ~ ~ ~~. V» ry• , . .August 5,1380 Deax DickWi111ams; ,~ 0~ ~J ~v ~ ~ ~, n r ~. \nf! J , 11 l~^ :~ 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~iG t `,~~~;~, 2hisiatter is being written as per our telephone conversati in a',,.4;;+ ooncerning I~terldian trash char3es. r~'-" 1Sy prope~tq islocated at 1424 West Fiast Street, l~Teridi3n. this ~,~,? -hdrtsc hasbeen vacant one year this month. Up to the time of the ,~~~"~'" ].~.ndlordasallnutilitiesbwillnbesbilledntoyou notithe~tenents, we .'~`"~'~~"~•'NCTG not`char~ed a trash pick up, since. we ha.d notified the ci`y ~".': hail-.that the house was unoccupied. ~,~ ;~ ... ,~'. I am nmw being changed for trash service, of which there has never ` ~.:~ .been trash placed for pickup. I calle3 pity H~11 and their response .~' '"y :' xas` that it made it easier billing to charne all property owners ~~'•? ~ jr .signed up for utilities. She sai3 the only way *ve eould avoid this ~~~' .•charga would be todiscontinue all utilities. I donut want the water ' -:.discontinued as I want to keep the Var3 end trees from ~ylnq. ~~ z x . - ~"think this is an unjust and illegal charge, and I do not Sntend r atq pay fora service not received. 1~y attorney, Mien Lance, ~ -'~E~t't]:d .also like to kno*a the ,j ustlficatloni'for such an uniust i~~' F,~ ~',,;~~~; -eshaTge imposed on property owners ,with unoccupied status, especially ' "Since it has been unoccupied for thelength of time as this one, ,~~ ~'~~' , -end Gity Hall had been notified as such. , ~ ,Y~,. Respectfully i~1rs. Jean ^zechowski 11571 Florida Dr. Boise. Idaho, 839 9 ~ V // ~/ ; '; %f ,:t. 'af ~'~ +~ a ,t RESOLUTION NO. 74 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF AT,d EST.I_r?p,TE OF THE E„PENSES FOR ALL PURPOSES FOR THE CITY OF T~ RIDIAN, ADA COL^VTY, IDAHO, FOB. THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING THE ].ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 1980, AND ENDITdG THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEnfBER., 1981, AND GIVING NOTICE OF PUL?LIC HEARING PP.IOR TO THE PASSAGE OF THE ANNUAL APPROPPSATIOPd BILL. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE P4AYOR AtdD CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF r!IERIDIAN, P,DA COUNTY, IDAHO: Section 1. That the following classified estimate of the probable amount of money necessary to be raised for all purposes in the City o£ Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, for the fiscal year of Septer.~ber, 1980-1981 be published in the Valley Nevis, a publication beginning with the issue of August 20, 1980, and P_ugust 27, 1980, and the Notice of Public Hearing on said estimate and probable levy required to raise said sum be published therevaith. Section 2. That a statement of the probable revenue of the City of *ieridian for the 1980-1981 fiscal year is as follows: Payments for Services--------------------------$ 93,304.00 Franchise payments----------------------------- 20,000.00 Permits and Licenses--------------------------- 48,835.00 Court Revenue---------------------------------- 24,000.00 Federal Shared Revenue------------------------- 55;000.00 Taxes and Penalties---------------------------- 262,936.00 State Sales Tax--------------------------°----- 6,500.00 Sundry Sources--------------------------------- 67,700.00 Enterprise, V.ater & Sewer---=------------------ 591,350.00 Liquor Apportionment--------------------------° 28,000.00 Budget Total--------------------------------°-•°$ 1,197,625.00 AMBROSE, FITZGERALD, CROOKSTON 8 McLAM A~~orneye end Counselors P.O. Box 4R7 MerlElen, ICNo 838eY TeISpllorM 88&//81 Section 3. That the probable amount necessary for all purpos for the City of T?eridian for the said fiscal year ending Septer^ber 30, 1981, is as follows: City Council----------------------------°------$ P.dministrative Expense------------------------- Office Expense--------------------------------- Health & Accident, All Fun ds----------------•--- Public Employees Retirement, A.11 Funds-------°- Supplemental F,ociderit, P_11 Funds--------------- Elections and Miscellaneous-------------------- Social Security, All Funds---------------------- Federal Unemployment--------------------------- Other Salaries Gene ral-------------------•------ Office Equipment------------------------------- Leqal Fees------------------------------------- Other General Government----------------------- Printin -------------------------°------ g------- General Government Buildings------------------- Police Office Administration------------------- Police Patrolmen------------------------------- Police Office----------------------------------- Police False Arrest Insurance------------------ 12,000.30 16,644.00 2,000.00 28,961.00 39,047.00 7,029.00 None 27,325.00 1,500.00 28,200.00 Tdone 35,000.00 23,000.00 2,®00.00 6,000.00 31,915.00 83,370.00 1, 763.00 4,169.00 r ,t Police Investigator--------------------------$ Police Traffic Grant and Control------------- Police Telephone----------------------------- Police Communications------------------------ Police Personnel Training & Reserves--------- Police School Patrol------------------------- Police School Patrol Equipment--------------- Animal Control and Shelter------------------- Fire Control--------------------------------- Fire. ~F.U------------------------------------ Building Inspections------------------------- Electrical InspectionsY~---------------------- Street Li ghting------------------------------ Public Works--------------------------------- Other Government Functions------------------- Recreation Play Grounds---------------------- Recreation Programs-------------------------- Water Administration------------------------- Sewer Administration------------------------- Water Pumping and Lift Sta.tions-------------- Sewer Lift and Pumping----------------------- Water Treatment------------------------------ Sewer Treatment Plant------------------------ Water Customer Accounts---------------------- Sewer Customer Accounts---------------------- Bond Re demption------------------------------ Depreciation--------------------------------- 19,344.00 51,687.00 4,428,00 2,921.00 3,228.00 15,9.17.00 1,749.00 13,259.00 30,520.00 12,348.00 14,-000.00 7,650.00 26,000.00 19,000.00 57,561.00 13,000.AO 7,000.00 82,000.00 34,230.00 21,000.00 9,000.-00 900.00 62,220.00 52,700.00 51,000.00 162,500.00 72,540.00 Total Bud.get---------------------------------$ 1,197,625.00 Section 4. That the estimated assessed valuation of the said City of Meridian is $18,758,237.00. Section 5. Notice is hereby given. that the estimated expenses and appropriation therefor, as herein set forth, will require a levy for general reserve and municipal purposes for the City of Deridian of not to exceed 35 mills on the dollar, and in compliance with Section 50-1003, Idaho Code, the Mayor and the City-Council krill hold a public hearing on September 2, 1980, at 7;30 p.m., at which. time any person interested may appear and protest such proposed estimate and levy prior to the passacxe of an annual appropriation bill. PASSED by the City Council and app rove. d. by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, this 18th day of August, 1980. A R ATTEST: AMB~ose, ~- a ana FITZOERALD, CROOKBTON 8 McLAM Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Boz 027 Madtllen, Idaho 83802 TeleD~one 88BM81 August 15, 1980 City of Meridian 728 Meridian St. Meridian, iD 83642 Subject: Request for early construction of Model Homes in Meridian Park Subdivision We hereby request permission to begin construction of three model homes on Lots 15, 16 & 17, Block 4, Peridian Park Subdivision, prior to final ap- proval of subdivision improvements. We understand and agree that there will be no sewer or water hook-ups to said model homes until such time as all subdivision improvements are com- pleted and approved. G-C Development Developers Meridian Park Subdivision i /~ ~S z~. ~ l~(S~c.en~~ /-J ~t:'-fYtC'_e.~ btil ~~