1988 04-046 ~
i~ ~
A G E N D A
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 4, 1988
ITEM:
MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING HELD MARCH 15, 1988 (APPROVED)
l: DAVE SHERMAN FROM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ON PROPERTY AT THE CITY PARR:
(POSTPONED)
2: HOALST & ANDERSON: PARKING AT 1434 MERIDIAN STREET: (POSTPONED)
3: DAY CARE:
4: PRETERMINATION HEARING: WATER/SEWER/TRASH DELINQUENCIES:(TURN-OFF
APPROVED)
5: APPROVE THE BILLS (APPROVED)
6: APPROVE THE AUDIT REPORT:(APPROVED)
7: AUDIT ENGAGEMENT FOR 1987-88 FISCAL YEAR: (APPROVED)
8: DEPARTMENT REPORTS:
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL APRIL 5, 1988
Regular Meeting of the Meridian City Council called to order by Mayor
Grant Kingsford at 7:30 p.m.:
Members Present: Bill Brewer; Ron Tolsma; Bert Myers; Bob Giesler:
Others Present: Members of Scout Troop #128, Walt Morrow, Howard &
Cathy Brown,Wanda& Pete Michaelson, Sandy Seeley, Deby Cavanaugh,
Gary & Sylvia Mahley, Robin Vaughan, Lew Reynolds, Dan Huffman, Fred
& Carolyn Shaddick, Cynthia Bowman, Russell Heughins, Sonia Heughins,
Patsy Garrett, Moe & Helen Alidjani, Tammy Perkins, Wayne Crookston,
K. Beumeler.
The Motion was made by Myers and seconded by Giesler to approve the
minutes of the previous meeting held March 15, 1988 as written:
Motion Carried: All Yea:
Mayor Kingsford welcomed Scout Troop #128 to the meeting:
Items #1 & #2 on the agenda were cancelled & postponed to later date
due to the participants being unable to be in attendance.
Item #3: Day Care:
Mayor Kingsford: Mr. City Attorney we have read your findings on
this item which you researched after the last meeting, would you
like to summarize this for the audience?
City Attorney: After the last Council meeting the Council instructed
me to the investigate the situation, what I did was review the City
of Boise Ordinances and the Ada County Ordinances, each of those
entities do have Ordinances pertaining to Day Care and whether or
not they are allowed under certain procedures. They both have defin-
itions which are dissimilar from each other. The City Attorney explained
the difference in the definitions for the audience and the procedures
involved with the different definitions.
Mayor Kingsford: Do the Council Members have any questions or comments
in regards to the Counselors explanation?
Brewer: Why don't we go ahead and have him conclude his statement with
his analysis and the options presented to the best of his knowledge.
Counselor: I will just read the anaylsis and options that are at the
end of my letter to the Mayor & Council for the audience.(Letter on
file with these minutes)
Mayor Kingsford: Any comments of the Council?
Brewer: I would like to thank the Counselor for doing this preparation
for us, I think it was very t~io~ugh, it required some research, it
brought some things to light thatI had some questions about and I
really appreciate his efforts.
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL •
APRIL 5, 7.988
PAGE # 2
Myers: I agree, it has everything in there that we need to look at.
Mayor Kingsford: Having not been here for the March 15th meeting, I would
pass on to the Counselor, that I feel very strongly as he has indicated
that there needs to be a method by which the neighbors have imput. I
think this is very important in a community. I do not think I would have
a problem if it was the desire of the Council to have a one time joint
sharing of cost to do these, it could be very cumbersome or if it is
the desire of the Council to reduce the fees for Day Care, I would not
object to that but I do think we have an obligation to those adjacent
neighbors to give the opportunity for imput when it involves them.
Also along this line myself and the City Clerk met with Central District
Health yesterday and they are interested in this as it will impact them,
Central District Health also has inspections they must do for Day Care
Centers. What is the desire or wish of the Council?
Giesler: I would like to say that under the Ordinance with the showing
of a hardship we can waiver or adjust these fees, also I do not see any
problem with having some kind of a payment plan for these fees, giving
them time to work out a pay schedule.
Myers: I guess the thing that is concerning me is the State Law requires
that registered letters be mailed to all the neighbors for their notif-
ication, is there any way we can circumvent that, to have the people
apply and do the leg work on that and save some costs?
Counselor: What Mr. Myers is taking about, I believe is under Idaho Code
67-6512 if you are dealing with a Conditional Use Permit you are required
to give notice to persons within 300 feet of the property, this is
required by State Law and our Ordinances follow that. The only way to
get around that is not make it a Conditional Use but an allowed use.
Brewer: I think there is a few things we need to keep in mind here, in
order to fullfill this seat and to be fair to everyone else who comes
before us through the year there is certain criteria we are going to
have to meet here. There is certain legal entities that have to be dealt
with, there are certain .inspections that are going to have to be made,
in order to conf+arm with the rules and regulations. What T would like
us to be able to do and whether it can be completed tonite or not, I
think we need to meet the bare minimum at least, as far as the legal
steps that need to be taken and then if we can figure out an easier
way or method of paying and a lessor sum that would be alright to.
If we are looking for a motion of some kind or whether we need to make
a new Ordinance, I am not real clear.
Mayor Kingsford: If we were to make a new Ordinance, you are looking at
a certain time frame, we would have to have Public Hearings and so forth
on that. Time is somewhat of the essence with these people also if we
do the Conditional Use Permit we are talking about a certain amount of
time, I think that one or the other of those two steps have to be taken.
I think it would be my recommendation that we stay with the Conditional
Use Permit, I think that if we have a joint group of people that apply
at the same time, I see no reason why part of the costs could not be
shared and reduced, for example the publication, I do not know why we
could publish more than one in one notice in the paper, maybe the
attorney fees as far as the Findings would be less under a joint filing.
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 5, 1988
PAGE # 3
It would be my recommendation that we proceed in this manner and stay
with the Conditional Use Permit and if you want to reduce the fees for
the application, I do not have any problem with that, that is your
disgression.
Tolsma: We have run into problems with covenants before that prohibits
businesses in a subdivision this is probably still going to pertain as
far as these Conditional Use Permits go also.
Mayor Kingsford: I do not have any doubt that covenants will effect some
of the people here and I certainly would recommend to the Council that if
a subdivision covenant be violated that we pass anything to jeopardize
them.
Brewer: Mr. Mayor do you have any recommendation as to the reduced fees?
Myers: Mr. Mayor, maybe the City Clerk could answer this, what would be
a ball park figure on the cost for an individual to go through this
process?
City Clerk: It is hard to give a figure due to the fact the cost of
the Findings hinge on how much testimony there is at the hearings.
Mayor Kingsford: We have had when there has been a great deal of testimony
for or against which has to be included in the Findings and considered
it make them more indepth which can more than double the cost, certainly
those of you who read the Findings on the Price Mall are aware of this.
Brewer: Mr. Mayor , you have not answered my question as to the recommend-
ation for reduction of fees?
Mayor Kingsford: Certainly with a joint filing it is going to reduce
our time somewhat, currently the filing fee is $160.00 , it should be
up to the Council, I certainly would recommend half or less, but it iso
up to the Council to decide.
Brewer: Could we not reduce the filing fee of $160.00 to $60.00:
Mayor Kingsford: Any discussion on that?
Myers: I would not have any problem with that, and then on the other
fees would it be fair to lump them together and pro-rate them somehow
or would it better to take each one individually at whatever the cost.
Mayor Kingsford: I would suggest to the Council that they set up some
kind of time frame that applicants would need to file by to take advant-
age of this reduced fee.
Counselor: I think you are running a lot risk for the City Council to
make a suggestion as to how the fees other than the original application
fee are going to be handled. I think it is up to the applicants if they
want to go together in a joint application, that is up to them, I assume
what you. mentioned so far that is $60.00, is that $60.00 per applicant
or $60.00 per application, that needs to be set forth, but I have a real
problem legally requiring the applicants to join in any fashion, they
should be in no way required to join, any sharing of fees should be
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL • •
APRIL 5, ].988
PAGE # 4
at their own agreement and they should be required to come up with that
agreement because I do not think it is the City Council's position to
make that as a condition and thats what it would appear to be. I think
it is up to the applicants as to how they are going to share the costs
because i think it is impossible for the Council to decide for them,
if one applicant is speaking for ten children and one speaking for six,
there is problems as to how much each one has for income, does this
mean they should split on a ratio or split the cost equally, there is
just to many problems in the Council deciding how those are to be shared.
I think the applicants should decide this themselves then they are all
responsible for it equally would be the only way I would recommend the
Council adopt something like that. I do not have any problem with the
waiver however our Ordinances do require some showing of hardship to
make the waiver, I would point that out to the Council. I think some
showing should be made for the waiver.
Myers: Would you have any problem if we reduced it to $60.00, that is
what you are talking about the waiver?
Counselor: Yes, the waiver of the difference.
Myers: What if we reduced it to $60.00 and said it was only good for
a specific time, what would happen if someone came in other than day
care centers, would we have a problem not approving them the same way?
Counselor: You would have a problem if it was granted without them show-
ing a hardship.
Myers: What are the requirements of showing a hardship?
Counselor: That is a subjective finding you have to reach upon, what-
ever you want them to present whether you want them to present a
financial affidavit or a statement they can not pay it, whatever the
Council wants to approve as to what that waiver is to be.
Tolsma: What you are saying is that we are setting a precedence here
if we reduce the Fee?
Counselor: If you want to change the Ordinance, we are back to time
again but you have the Ordinance that you are supposed to be governed
by unless you change them and what you are saying tonite is that we
are going to change them just because one group of people want to
change them without, I mean as far as the waiver, without any showing
that they would qualify for the waiver if they were individuals or a
different business. If you want to waive them and you follow the
procedures for the waiver I have no problem with that what so ever,
or you change the Ordinance and make it different. As long as you
have that Ordinance I think you have to go by it or amend or repeal
it.
Mayor Kingsford: Given the complexity of this I wonder if it might not
be a good idea if maybe we establish a committee to deal with the
applicants, to come up with a hardship showing and deal with those on
an individual basis, find out who wants to petition jointly and
separately and etc. Are there members of the Council who might want
to participate in that?
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL • •
APRIL 5, 1988
PAGE ~ 5
Councilman Giesler, Councilman Myers, The City Attorney and Wanda
Michaelson agreed to serve on this Committee. Councilman Giesler
is to serve as Chairman of this Committee. I would ask the Committee
to get together and make a recommendation to the Council at the
next meeting.
Counselor: I do not want to put a damper on this but I would just say
that the City Council does have Ordinances that they have to follow
and until they are changed they have to make their decisions guided by
those Ordinances and all I do is advise them what they are.
Brewer: That is the point I was trying to make earlier and we cannot
afford the time or pleasure to change Ordinances consistently to fit
the many different varied circumstances that come before us. We are
kind of in a spot in some of these decisions when we have a group such
as this content and happy. We do have to keep in mind as our Counselor
has eluded to, in order to serve you folks we have to be fair and also
legal in the way we handle everyone else who comes before us to, those
in the past and those in the future, I hope you all understand that.
We sympathize with your positions and we are making an effort to come
to the best conclusion.
Myers: I have been thinking about this, and the cost for the City to
enforce our Ordinances, not necessary Day Care but any business that
has not obtained a Conditional Use Permit would be much more than if
we reduced the fees and got it licensed and they were legal instead
of having them out there not being legal. That to me would look like
something we as a City Council could work toward is getting these
people somewhere along the line getting them on board legally instead
of what they are doing now.
Mayor Kingsford: The way we operate, we rely on this almost exclusively
and that is that somebody has to make a complaint and then we send a
letter requesting proper zoning or cease and desist.
Giesler: I would ask all of you to check first on the. covenants of your
subdivision to see if there any problems before you even come to us, if
there is something in the covenants about no businesses out of your
home then you are going to have to start with that project before coming
before the City.
Mayor Kingsford: For those of you who do not know there should be a
copy of the covenants attached to the title insurance policy, also on
most of the newer subdivisions the City has copies on file.
Someone from the audience commented on having to have 100% approval of
the neighbors if this is so we could all have problems. Is there a.ny
way we could work around this? I feel I have some rights to.
Mayor Kingsford: That is the reason for Zoning protection, this not only
protects you but also the other people who paid for their homes and of
course they paid for them in good faith knowing. that was something that
was not allowed, so to change from that I feel very strongly that people
have some property rights.
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL • •
APRIL 5, 1988
PAGE # 6
Comment from the audience, do we have to have 1000, that is the problem
Mrs. Wilson had she had one sour apple neighbor so she withdrew.
Mayor Kingsford: In regards to Mrs. Wilson there were several other people
who called on this after the hearing. She withdrew so it was never taken
to full consideration.
Counselor: I think I can address that, under our Ordinances there is no
specific requirement in our Ordinances that you do not violate the coven-
ant by your use, it is a factor to be considered under our Conditional
Use procedures as to whether or not the particular use you are requesting
is allowed by your covenants, it is a factor, not a grant or deny situat-
ion but it is a factor that both the Planning & Zoning Commission and
the City Council have to consider, the problem with the covenants and the
City does not persay enforce the covenants the covenants themselves
have an amendment procedure, the reason. Mr. Giesler eluded to this is
there is no use of you going all the way to the City Council if you know
you have a problem within your own subdivision.
Mayor Kingsford: You could spend a good deal of money and get to the
City Council and we may approve you and anyone in that subdivision could
bring suit against you and they could get you to cease operation.
Tammy Perkins: Mr Mayor, the way I understand the Ordinance reads current-
ly, is that anyone who watches children is considered a day care, is that
not the way the Ordinance reads now? You have talked about fee changes
but you have not talked about changing the Ordinance specifically and I
was just wondering if that is something that is still pending or if you
are going ahead and do that at a later time.
Mayor Kingsford: We will have to address that, this is something that
will be ini~ta_-~itec7. through Planning & Zoning, prior to the State changing
the Code starting up the Day Care License they used six or more so our
Ordinance followed that, now with the change and the changing of name
of the different sizes, that has changed ours so it is basically any-
one who takes care of children as you have indicated.
Brewer: There is one other thing I would like to elude to, it has been
this Councils policy the last several years to try to keep from having
Conditional Use Permits as opposed to Commercial Zoning and I believe
your case is different and probably is one that falls within a Condit-
ional Use Permit but we have been making a real effort to stop this
sort of thing, I will give you one example, that is a beautician operating
out of her home and a beautician operating on the Main Street here in
town, you try to compare the cost of doing business in both of those
establishments makes a great of difference. I personally do feel your
instance is one and I feel comfortable with the Conditional Use Permit
in this case however we have had one call from a commercial business in
town eluded they are paying taxes, they have a lot of expenses out there
and in a great many ways they are doing exactly the same thing as you
only in a commercial aspect. So they are wanting to make sure that
everything from their veiwpoint is done justly and fairly as well.
Item #4: Pre-Termination Hearing: Water/Sewer/Trash Delinquencies:
Mayor Kingsford: You have been informed in writing, if you choose to,
CITY COUNCIL . •
APRIL 5, 1988
PAGE # 7
you have the right to a pre-termination hearing before the Mayor and
Council to appear in person to be judged on facts and defend the claim
made by the City that your water, sewer and trash bill is delinquent.
You may retain Counsel: Is there anyone in the audience who wishes a
pre-termination hearing? There was no response. Due to their failure
to pay their water bill or to present any valid reason why the bill
has not been paid, their water shall be turned off on April 13, 1988
In order to have their water turned back on, there will be an additso~.al
fee of $10.00. They are hereby informed that they may appeal or have
the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judical District Court,
pursuant to Idaho Code. Even thogh they appeal their water will be
shut off.
The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Myers to approve the turn-
off list in the amount of $5,006.30:
Motion Carried: All Yea:
Item #5: Approve the Bills:
The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Myers to approve payment
of the bills:
Motion Carried: all Yea:
Item #6: Approve the Audit Report for Fiscal 1986-87:
Mayor Kingsford: Members you have had this report for some time, are there
any questions or are you ready to approve?
Tolsma: I thought it was very well done:
Mayor Kingsford: We have been very satisfied with our Auditors, they have
even been helpful to us in some areas.
The Motion was made by Brewer and seconded by Tolsma that the Audit
Report for 1986-87 Fiscal Year be accepted and approved:
Motion Carried: All Yea:
Item #7: Audit Engagement for 1987-88 Fiscal Year:
Mayor Kingsford: I would like to recommend for the Council's consideration
that we approve of the firm of Messuri, Bates & Gibbons for the fiscal
year of 1987-88 audit engagement. This is for the same amount that was
paid in the last fiscal year.
The Motion was made by Giesler and seconded by Myers that the City of
Meridian engage the firm of Messuri, Bates & Gibbons to conduct the
audit for the 1987-88 fiscal year.
Motion Carried: All Yea:
Department Reports:
Tolsma: Two things, I checked with the Fire Chief and he is going to have
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL • •
APRIL 5, 1.988
PAGE # ~
the Fire Marshall look into a spray painting facility we have operating
in the old Creamery Building. They are spray painting automobiles.
Also I received a comment from a concerned citizen about a salvage yard
that is operating down on Ada Street. I do not know who it belongs to
but they said there was a bunch of old cars, trailers and trailer loads
of tires parked down there and they wanted to know if we had started a
salvage yard in town.
Mayor Kingsford: City Clerk, would you ask the Police Department to take
a look in that area.
Being no further business to come before the Council the Motion was made
by Myers and seconded by Brewer to adjourn at 8:15 p.m.:
Motion Carried: All Yea:
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDING)
APPROVED:
ATTEST:
Jac~ie~lanfy, City
pp': Mayo & Council
~~ P Z Commission
Mail: (2)
File ( 2 )
A ty, Eng, Fire
Police, Ward, Stuart
Mitich, Gass, Hallett
Valley News,Statesman
ACHD, NIMD, ACC
CDH, Settlers Irrg.
G T KIN SFORD, R
• •
rMessuri~ Bates
ANTIIUNl' J. MESSCRI, SR., C.P.A. Ff (gibbons
AL\'IU K. BATF.ti, C.P.A. Certtf/edPubHcAccou»taats
GRANT E. GIRRUIS. C.l'. A.
PBOFESSIOtiAL BUILDING
ltill.3 ELLIS AVENUE, CAI,DWELL, IDAHO S3fiOS
(211N) -159--1(119/336-51372
The Honorable Mayor and Council
City of Meridian
Meridian, Idaho
TERRY L. SCOTI; C.P. A.
lonx P. ur:Ati, c.e.4.
We are pleased to confirm our understanding of the services we
are to provide for the Cit of Meridian
for the year ended Se tember 30, 1988 ~
will audit the general purpose financial statements of the
City of Meridian as of and for the year _ ended
Se tember 30, 1988 Also, we will include in your report
the f ollo wing supplemental information that will be subjected
to the auditing procedures applied in our audit of the general
purpose financial statements.
1.
2.
3.
Operations in Tax Rolls
Our audit will be made in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards and will include tests of the accounting
records of the City of Meridian and other
procedures we consider necessary to enable us to express an
unqualified opinion that the financial statements are fairly
presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles consistently applied. If our opinion is other than
unqualified, we will fully discus s the reasons with you in
advance.
Our procedures will include tests of documentary evidence support-
ing the transactions recorded in the accounts, and may include
tests of the physical existence of inventories, and direct con-
firmation of receivables and certain other assets and liabilities
by correspondence with selected individuals, creditors, and banks.
Tn~ will request written representations from your attorneys as
part of the engagement, and they may bill you for responding to
this inquiry. At the conclusion of our examination, we will also
-1-
\IF41Rh:1( ()F
.441 F. RICAN INtiI'I'fl'TF: Oh' (:Fa(TI FI F.D P(B LIC AC(:OVNTANTS
IUAl1U tiUCll•~I'Y OF Cha('1'1 FI P:D PVNLIC AC(:OUNTANTS
• •
request certain written representations from you about the finan-
cial statements and related matters.
An audit is based primarily on the selective testing of account-
ing records and related data; therefore, our audit will involve
judgment about the number of transactions to be examined and the
areas to be tested. Because we will not perform a detailed exami-
nation of all transactions, there is a risk that material errors,
irregularities, or illegal acts, including fraud or defalcations,
may exist and not be detected by us. We will advise you, how-
ever, of any matters of that nature that come to our attention.
we understand that you will provide us with the basic information
required for our audit and that you are responsible for the accur-
acy and completeness of that information. We will advise you
about appropriate accounting principles and their application and
will assist in the preparation of your financial statements, but
the responsibility for the financial statements remains with you.
This responsibility includes the maintenance of adequate records
and related controls, the selection and application of accounting
principles, and the safeguarding of assets.
We understand that your employees will prepare all cash or other
confirmations we request and will locate any invoices selected by
us for testing.
Our examination is not specifically designed and cannot be relied
on to disclose material weaknesses in accounting controls. Ho w-
ever, during the audit, if we become aware of such material weak-
nesses in internal accounting control or ways that we believe
management practices can be improved, we will communicate them to
you in a separate letter.
We expect to begin our audit approximately within 30 days after
notification that records are ready to audit and to issue our
report no later than 90 days after the start of our field work.
Our fees for these services will be based on the actual time
spent at our standard hourly rates, and out-of-pocket costs such
as report production, typing, postage, etc. Our standard hourly
rates vary according to the degree of responsibility involved and
the experience level of the personnel assigned to your audit.
Our invoices for these fees will be rendered each month as work
progresses and are payable on presentation. Based on our
preliminary estimates, the fee will not exceed $ 4,250
This estimate is based on anticipated cooperation from your
personnel and the assumption that unexpected circumstances will
not be encountered during the audit. If significant additional
-2-
MESSURI, BATES & GIBBONS
CF.RT[FIED PUBLIC ACCOUN'T'ANTS
•
time is necessary, we will discuss it with you and arrive at a
new fee estimate before we incur the additional costs.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to the City of
Meridian and believe this letter accurately
summarizes the significant terms of our engagement. If you have
any questions, please let us know. If you agree with the terms
of our engagement as described in this letter, please sign the
enclosed copy and return it to us.
RESPONSE:
This letter correctly sets forth the understanding of the
City of Meridian
(Date)
Mayor
-3-
City of ,/'~~,-, ~ eg~ , Idaho
ty Clerk
MF:SS('R1. BATES & GIBBONS
CF.RI'1FIE1) PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Very truly yours,
• Pagel
Turn Off scheduled for April 13, 1988
Turn Off Meeting April 5, 1988
Account# Name & Address Amount Due
360 TED J. NELSON 49.25
417 W. Broadway
500 PEARL LAND & LIVESOCK CO. 155.50
422 W. Idaho
900 RICK S. WISDOM 44.15
323 W. Idhao
3312 SANDY MYERS 41.60
519 W. Pine
3562 VIRGINIA MEYER 41.60
230 Camellia
5326 DARLIENE SEEMAN 46.70
1216 W. 12th Ave
5560 LELAND GILBERT RICE 59.45
1417 W. 13th Ave
5606 JUDY ALBRECHT 59.45
1406 W. 14th St
5682 EMORY WEST 49.25
1539 W. 15th St
5688 STEVEN TATMAN 110.45
1521 W. 15th St
5772 ROBERT TIDWELL 109.80
1433 Elm Place
5774 SHERRY ODOM 87.30
1425 Elm Pace
5820 SANDY WATERS 46.70
1436 W. Washington St.
5850 KATHRYN ENGDAHL 25.90
1315 W. Carlton
6520 JOHN BALLARD 39.05
1036 W. 12th Ave
7296 RICHARD TRUDEAU 77.30
1027 W. Carlton
22298 RUTH BIRTZ 34.50
3780 Sea Island Ct
30824 RICK YEAGER 49.25
2030 Todd Way
, • • page 2
Account # Name & Address Amount Due
30888 ROYAL ASHBY 85.35
2053 Kristen Way
31032 GREGORY BAUM 53.10
2618 Rebecca Way
31080 MICHAEL L. DAMS 56.90
1750 W. Chateau Dr
31090 CLIFFORD WELLS 37.30
1830 W. Chateau Dr
32424 KERRY L. LEE 51.80
1723 Sandalwood Dr
32508 MALCOLM BEACH 67.20
1980 Tana Dr
32520 ALPHA DENNY 123.20
1841 W. Chateau Dr
32548 DONALD H. FISHER 59.45
1750 Reardon Ct
32564 EVA LOUISE REED 59.45
2291 Linder Rd
32566 BERNARD LANDRY 51.80
2261 N. Linder Rd
36454 ROYCE CONST. 51.80
2702 N.W. 12th St
37224 LEEON MARTINEAU 30.50
1332 Darrah Dr
37282 HARRY HAZEN 36.50
2831 N.W. 15th St
38410 EDWARD MACK 67.10
1441 Tana Dr
38420 GREG A. MARSHALL 51.80
2207 N.W. 15th St
38564 ROGER VAN MIDDENDORP 39.05
2316 N.W. 15th St
38600 ROBIP~ YELTON 69.40
1089 W. Chateau Dr
38602 ROBERT V. WALLER 115.55
1085 W. Chateau Dr
38640 JEFFREY MURRAY 72.20
2311 N.W. 11th St
• • page 3
Account # Name & Address Amount Due
38824 PHILIP R. CARROLL 69.65
1080 Delmar Dr
41230 DAVID L. CANTRELL 70.55
690 Tiffany Dr
41432 LEO J. DOREY 123.00
1916 N.W. 8th St
48556 ERMINE DAVIS 79.85
1014 Claybourne Dr
48728 MICHAEL J. KELLY 49.25
2071 N.E. 10th Ave
48834 WAIDE WOODLAND 44.15
1074 Clarene St
49264 DAVID COLLINS 108.20
1883 Jericho Rd
52872 PHILLIP WRIGHT 46.70
302 E. Washington
53692 DR. H.M. VALENTI 68.00
1302 E. 1st St
53958 H.L. ROBERTS 54.35
1431 Meridian St
56342 SCOTT JACOBSON 69.65
406 E. Broadway
56392 HONKY TONK COWBOY BAR 102.80
704 E. 1st St
56440 D00-DARS SALOON 367.85
127 E. Idaho Ave
56444 MURRI'S ELECTRONICS 119.50
131 E. Idaho
58690 BEN W. HARWELL 36.50
435 E.State
59470 MIKE CLAUNCH 50.05
338 E. Sate, #2
59540 STEVE'S RADIATOR & WELDING 77.35
41 E. BOWER AVE.
60186 GERALD WILKINS BLKSMITH 36.50
218 E. BOWER AVE
60320 KIMBERLY WOLFE 105.35
424 E. 3rd St
• page 4
Account # Name & Address Amount
60486 KENNETH FREIER 36.50
305 E. 2nd St.
60536 WILLIAM HOWARD 130.90
32 E. Franklin
61766 STEVEN D. RYKER 44.15
234 E. Williams Ave
61970 LYNN EVANS 213.40
517-519-521 E. 1st St So.
92142 MARVIN WHITEMAN 51.25
439 S.W. 7th Ave
92856 MARTY FLOWER 64.55
656 Fulmer Ct
92876 NEAL TOWN 51.80
673 W. Barrett
93344 ADAN & ALCIE GONZALEZ 51.80
210 S.W. 7th Ave
93345 ADAN & ALICE GONZALEZ 36.50
220 S.W. 7th Ave
93354 RICHARD IMLACH 62.00
156 S.W. 7th Ave
93355 RICHARD IMLACH 36.50
150 S.W. 7th Ave
93356 RICHARD IMLACH 59.45
146 S.W. 7th Ave
93357 RICHARD IMLACH 51.80
140 S.W. 7th Ave
93465 HENKELS & MCCOY 20.50
595 W. Franklin
93466 HENKELS & MCCOY 26.10
607 W. Franklin
93800 DANIEL BRONSON 46.70
8 Rose Circle
96910 THOMAS H. BRANDY 36.50
411 S. Meridian St
Grand Total Due 5,006,30