Loading...
1988 05-03. _ . • • A G E N D A MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY 3, 1988 ITEM: MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING HELD APRIL 19, 1988: PROCLAMATION DECLARING MAY 3, 1988 AS NATIONAL TEACHERS DAY: 1: DAY CARE: (COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS APPROVED) 2: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE BY JERRY SMITH FOR A CHURCH AT 1114 MERIDIAN ROAD: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS) 3: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION RECORDING FINAL PLAT ON MERIDIAN MANOR #5: (APPROVED) 4: PRE-TERMINATION HEARING: WATER/SEWER/TRASH DELINQUENCIES: (TURN-OFF APPROVED) 5: APPROVE THE BILLS: (APPROVED) 6: APPROVE PARKING CONCEPT FOR HOALST & ANDERSON: (APPROVED) 7: DEPARTMENT REPORTS: • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY 3, 1988 Regular Meeting of the Meridian City Council called to order by Mayor Grant Kingsford at 7:30 p.m.: Members Present: Bill Brewer; Ron Tolsma; Bert Myers; Bob Giesler: Others Present: Roy Porter, Bob Mitich, Gary Smith, Walt Morrow, Wayne Crookston, Julie Stutts, K. Buemeler, Chris Norbyhn, Wanda Michealson, Group of Day Care Operators: The Motion was made by Myers and seconded by Tolsma to approve the minutes of the previous meeting held April 19, 1988 as written: Motion Carried: All Yea: Mayor Kingsford read a Proclamation declaring May 3, 1988 as National Teacher Day and a Proclamation declaring May 5, 1988 as National Day Of Prayer: Item #1: Day Care Mayor Kingsford: We have had a'Committe meeting for the last two weeks, At this time I would ask the Chairman of that Committee to report to the Council on their findings but before I do so, I will advise this is not a Public Hearing there will not be Public Testimony. Councilman Giesler: The City Attorney has not arrived as yet and he was going to make the presentation, how do you want to proceed? Mayor Kingsford: I think you had some comments, Councilman Giesler that you wanted to make so why don't you go ahead with them. Councilman Giesler: I had Councilman MYers, The City Attorney, The Chairman of the Planning & Zoning, Walt Morrow and P &Z Member Jim Johnson help on this for more imput, I appreciate your help gentlemen, I would like to say I received a letter yesterday and one today and I would like to read a portion of them. The first one starts out, I under- stand that you are trying to do away with private in home day care, the second letter starts out with as working parents with small children, we are very concerned about the proposed child-care ordinance that you are considering. It is our understanding that the passing of such an ordinance will cause various home caretakers to have to stop child-care in their homes, I would like to say we are not proposing Ordinances, the Ordinances are already in effect. We were appointed by the Mayor to look into these Ordinances to see what we could do to make it easier on the day-care operators. These day-cares have been operating in the City Limits for a number of years illegally and it wasn't until the State Legislatures passed the bill that they had to be licensed to participate in the food program that this came about, so we are not making Ordinances that would put these people out of business, this is a process they should have went through went they started their day-care operation, it has just caught up with them now and we are trying to work this out believe us. We already have these Ordinances in effect, it is nothing we are putting MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL • • MAY 3, x,988 PAGE # 2 together right now to make it hard on them. After researching the City of Boise Ordinances, which seems to be the way the day-care operators wanted us to go, we looked into that and our own Ordinance and came up with an outline that we felt would work for the City, last Thursday we presented that outline to their spoke-person and two of the operators that were there, I would like now to have our City Attorney go over the outline and explain each item as he sees fit. City Attorney: I would first say the outline is in large part a result of the review of the Boise Ordinance that pertain to the treatment of day-care as a zoning issue, we are not getting into any kind of a license- ing ordinance, that persay, I believe is relying upon the State for that purpose, so we are dealing, I should say also the license deal in my mind is more of the aspect of to whether or not we have good day-cares and good day-care operators, that is not the function of the City of Meridian at this juncture. I would just say a portion of the outline, the way the City of Boise handles it as an overview for you, they define child care facility in three fashions or there are three catagories, they have a Family Child Care Home which is five or fewer children, they have a Group Child Care Home which is six to twelve children, and a Child Care Center which is more than twelve children, those definitions are in their licensing provision however those carry over to the way they treat it in the zoning aspects of their ordinance. For all of the day-care facilities which would include 1 through 5 and 6 through 12 they use what is called an accessory use definition in the residential districts they do however have a procedure that they require all of those day-care facilities to go through. The procedure by their ordinance is that the day-care operator desiring to operate within their particular residential district applies to their Planning Adminstrator for approval, they pay a fee and then the Administrator review the application, probably goes out and looks at the home, reviews the immediate area and vicinity of the home, then he make a decision as to whether or not that day-care center is allowed to operate as an accessory use in that residential district. He makes a decision and then mails out to all property owners a notice basically to all the ones who abutt the property where the day-care is to be in operation. When he mails that notice out the adjoining property owners then have ten days to file comments with the Planning Adminstrator as to whether they like it or they dont like it. If they do not like it then they present an appeal to the Planning Adminstrator and he then puts that on the agenda for the City Council and they review it, if there is enough objection to that day-care facility at that time the City Council can remove that approval. The objecting neighbor to get that on the agenda or to appeal it has to pay a $100.00 filing fee to have his appeal heard. So in the City of Boise they also have procedures that they follow to provide for notice and provide for a means by which neighbors are informed as to the proposal and they have an opportunity for imput. I would however classify their procedure as a rear-end approach, that is the notice and the opportunity for neighbors to be heard comes after approval or after preliminary approval if you will, in my mind that can cause several problems most of .which is the operator may believe that they can operate and then later have it taken away from them. I think that is a detrsnnent no only to the operator but also to the neighbors. Their filing fee for the operators from 1 to 12 children I believe is $35.00 and maybe $50.00 but if you go all the way through that process the total cost is either to the operator or to the appeal- ing neighbor is $135.00 or maybe $150.00. Our current Ordinances while we do not have definitions that are very workable, the Committee agreed MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL • . MAY 3, 1988 PAGE # 3 that our current definitions, q~.~ate definitions for a day-care can be read to require a Conditional Use Permit if there is a care or a day-care facility if there are two children, we all agreed that is not a very good definition and we propose to change that but under our procedure as Councilman Giesler already stated, we already have Conditional Use procedures which do apply to day-care facilities, under our current procedure, an applicant comes in, makes his application and then the property owners are informed, then the Planning & Zoning has a hearing they make recommendations to the City Council and then there is a hearing before the City Council, the fee is $160.00 for that, it is more expensive in Meridian than in Boise at this juncture it is $160.00 filing fee plus you pay cost of publication, mailing cost and any legal fees for the Findings of Fact involved. Our procedure however I would say is a front-end procedure. This procedure gives the operator some knowledge as to whether they are going to be successful or not rather than waiting until the end and have an approval then have it revoked.After considering Boise's approach and what we require now under our Conditional Use the Committee felt there was a need to change the overall procedure, particularly where it applied to day-care facilities where it served five or fewer children, I will go through the outline with the suggested Ordinance changes now: (COPY OF THE OUTLINE ATTACHED ON FILE WITH THESE MINUTES) Another thing that came up when discussing this that was not brought up when we met with Mrs. Michaelson and the operators that were present, we did not discuss and there is this other legal avenue to approach the day-care situation, in the past the City of Meridian has treated although not by definition, but as a practical matter treated day-care facilities having one to six children as not really bearing the requirement of going through a Conditional Use Permit. The Zoning Ordinance was adopted on April Z, 1984, prior to that date in the "A" Residential District, home occupations were allowed, under the previous policy of the district therefore if you had, if a day=care operator had the care of one to six children and the operation was in effect prior to April 2, 1984, they would probably be classified as a home occupation which was a valid and legal use under our old Ordinance's. Our new Ordinance's provide recognition for legal uses in effect and in operation at the time of the adoption of the new Ordinance. What it amounts to is you have a grandfather right. If any of the operators fall under that classification who have one to six children, they would not have to go through any of the propos- als that we are talking about. I will now turn the time back to Council- man Giesler. Councilman Giesler: Mayor & Councilman those are the proposals the Committe has arrived at, I would at this time entertain any questions on these. Councilman Myers: I have something that I would like to clarify, on the hookups on the sewer and water, there is a real question in my mind as to whether or not, having a care center in your home where there are twelve children or less if that is going to be a real impact on the sewer, of course it will be in that particular area, I feel there are probably some trade-offs because if the children were not there they would be home. I am~not sure that is a change in occupancy as such however that is something we are going to have to look at. There is a good possibility that in my mind thats not really a valid thing to charge an extra hookup because you are going to have a child care in your house. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL . • MAY 3, 1988 PAGE # 4 Mayor Kingsford: Any other comments? Councilman Tolsma: That is one of the comments I had requiring sewer and water connection fees. Mayor Kingsford: Certainly those and other issues in .regards to this if it is the desire of the Council to pass or recommend that we draft this in Ordinance form, these are items that would be open for discussion at Public Hearings both at the Planning & Zoning and the City Council so there will be time for imput on those items: Councilman Giesler: I visited with Boise City and they advised they had some problems at times with their method of handling these day-care centers. Mayor Kingsford: I might also mention that with checking with Boise Staff they are anticipating fee increases. If there are no other comments I would entertain a motion to either nay, yea or table. The Motion was made by Brewer to table the suggested outline for day-care centers until after the hearings. Mayor Kingsford: A point of order I think what we need to do is if the Council is reasonably satisfied that we need to have an ordinance change that they want these things entertained then what we have to do is make recommendation to the Planning & Zoning Commission that they entertain these and other suggestions in Public Hearing and suggest a recommended ordinance change to the Council. Councilman Brewer: I withdraw my motion. The Motion was made by Myers and seconded by Brewer to pass the proposed guidelines along to the Planning & Zoning Commission for their review and to start the process for an amendment to the ordinance. Motion Carried: All Yea: Mayor Kingsford:"I acknowledge receipt of a petition to.the_.Mayor & Council dated todaythat will be taken into consideration and passed on tb the Planning & Zoning Commission as well: The Mayor & Council thanked the Committee for the effort they put forth on this item; Item #2: Public Hearing: Request for Variance for Church at 1114 Meridian: Mayor Kingsford: Is there a representative to make a presentation to the Council? Chris Norbyhn, 7426 Lake Hazel Road, Mr. Norbyhn was sworn by the City Attorney: Norbyhn: I am a member of the Church of the First Born, basically what we want to do is take the building that is there and turn it into a church, I believe this building was orginally built as a church and we feel this would work as a church for our congregation. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL • MAY 3, 1988 PAGE # 5 If anyone has any questions I will be happy to try to answer them; Mayor Kingsford: At this time I will open the Public Hearing, is there anyone in the audience who wishes to testify in this matter? There was no response, the Public Hearing was closed: Councilman Brewer: Living in that vicinity and when it was a church before it certainly created no problems and since that time I believe there has been a paved parking lot improvement which would improve the conditions over what it was before. I have no problem this returning to that use. The Motion was made by Myers and seconded by Tolsma to have the City Attorney prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions on this request. Motion Carried: All Yea: Item #3: Request for Extension on Filing Final Plat on Meridian Manor #5: Mayor Kingsford: Councilman you have an attachment to your agenda regarding this request. Any questions or comments of the Council? The Motion was made by Giesler and seconded by Myers to grant the extension as requested on Meridian Manor #5: Motion Carried: All Yea: Item #4: Pre-Termination Hearing, Water/Sewer/Trash Delinquencies: Mayor Kingsford: You have been informed in writing, if you choose to, you have the right to a pre-termination hearing before the Mayor and Council to appear in person to be judged on facts and defend the claim made by the City that your water, sewer and trash bill is delinquent. You may retain Counsel: Is there anyone in the audience who wishes a hearing? There was no response; Due to their failure to pay their water bill or to present any valid reason why the bill has not been paid, their water shall be turned off on May 11, 1988. In order to get their water turned back on there will be an additional fee of $10.00. They are hereby informed that they may appeal the decision or have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial District Court, pursuant to Idaho Code. Even though they appeal their water will be shut off. The amount of the delinquencies this month is $4,532.05: The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Giesler to approve the turn-off list of delinquent accounts: Motion Carried: All Yea: Item # 5: Approve the Bills: The Motion. was made by Tolsma and seconded by Myers to approve payment of the bills: Motion Carried: All Yea; Item #6: Approve Parking Concept for Hoalst & Anderson: MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL • • MAY 3, 1988 PAGE # 6 Mayor Kingsford: I believe all the Council Members have received a copy of the letter from Hoalst & Anderson with regards to the parking lot going to be on the North side of their building. With a completion date by the end of August. Councilman Myers: I am with these people over right direction. Councilman Brewer: I a~ issue will be settled. The Motion was made by concept for Hoalst and happy to see that, after the contact we~have had the past years: I think this is a step in the n glad they have decided to go this way and the Myers and seconded by T©3:°sma to approve the parking Anderson and:the completion date.for this project. Motion Carried: All Yea: Department Reports: City Engineer: Concerning the park at NW 8th Street, several of the res- idents in the area have expressed interest in having some playground equipment and such at this park, they have volunteered Qn~ne help with this project.<.There are some Grant Funds that are available for projects of this type and `the Council needs to authorize applying for the funds. The Motion was made by Myers and seconded by Tolsma that the City of Meridian prepare and submit a application for grant for improvements at the 8th Street Park. Motion Carried; All Yea: Mayor Kingsford: First off as the Council may or may not 'have seen we have a podium over there and I would like to publically thank Ken Thompson from Audio Electronics, he built that for the City and the only thing we have to pay for on that is the microphone, he donated this to the City,•we have a bill for $620.00 that he has voided. I would like to have approval from the Council for myself and the City Clerk to prepare an appropriate letter thanking him for that We shopped around for premade or custom podiums and they were that or more. It was neat that we were given that by a local businessman. The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Myers that the Mayor and City Clerk prepare a suitable letter for the gentleman. Motion Carried: A11 Yea: Being no further business to come before the Council the Motion was made by Myers and seconded by Tolsma to adjourn at 8:17 p.m.: Motion Carried: A11 Yea: (TAPE ON FILE. OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) APPROVED: ATTEST: G T KINGSFORD, O Jack Niemann, City Clerk s • 2217 N.W. 14th Meridian, ID 836k2 April 29, 1988 Meridian City Council City Hall Meridian, ID 836+2 Gentlemen: It is m.Y understanding that you are trying to do away with privateer in-home day car In this age when it is imparative that both parents work, I feel is decision should be considered a little further. In our situation, as in many others, I work because it is necessary. There is nothing I would like more than to stay home with my children, but since this is 3.mpossible, I feel my children should be exposed to the best care my husband and I can find. I don't feel this is a possibility in the over-crowded, commercial day care facilities. In addition, most facilities do not take children over seven or eight years of age. I have three children, all of which fall in the over seven age group. Should these children be left alone in our home? Where are these children to go? For the past five years my children have spent the majority of their waking hours, when not at school, in day care. I feel they are getting the loving personal attention they need i,n our absence. The lack of day care facilities in Meridian will certainly make prospective citizens of our community think twice, as well as many current residents leaving our community because of lack of day care facilities. Meridian is a growing, centrally located city with many things to recommend it, let's not set progress back with this move. I realize you feel you are doing the right thing, but, where would you put your children if your wife had to start work tomorrow? Please reconsider this decision for the welfare of our children. Sincerely, ~ a ,~w; Cynthia L. Davis d CC: Idaho Statesmen ~` . '~ • c: Outline of Proposed Ordinance Changes Regarding Day Care, Home Occupations, Etc. I Define Babysitting -- Bascially as the care of children: 1. Either in the Childs own home, or 2. In the babysitters home for not more than 3 unrelated children (not brothers or sisters) or all related children (brothers and sisters only) regardless of the number II Allow babysitting as an allowed use in all residential zones III Define Day Care Facility similarly to the way Boise does: 1. Family Child Care Home -- 5 or fewer children served 2. Group Child Care Some -- 6-12 children served 3. Child Care Center -- more than 12 children served IV A. Allow Family Child Care Home (1-5 children) as an accessory use in the Residential Districts, R-4 and R-8; not allowed as accessory use in any other districts B. Require notice of proposed use to all abutting lots or lands which shall include those lots or lands separated from the subject property by streets or alleys C. Considered as a commercial use and therefore must not violate restrictive covenants pertaining to commercial uses D. Fee of $80.00 plus pay all costs of notice, legal, engineering fees; applicant consent to lien for costs E. Pay any additional required sewer and water connection fees AMBROSE, FITLOERAID BCROOKBTON Attorneys end Couneelore P.O. lloz 427 Meridlen, Idaho tg842 Telephorre88&4187 V. A. Allow Group Child Care Home (6-12) only as a conditional use in all residential, in the Limited Office, neighborhood business, community business, regional shopping center business, general retail and service commercial, and old town districts. B. Follow conditional use procedures and fees now required by the City ":"II • • AMBROBE, FITZOERALD 6 CROOICBTON Attomsys a~M Counselors P.O. Box 127 Merldlen, Idaho 83842 Telephone 888.1161 C. Considered as a commercial use and therefore must not violate restrictive covenants pertaining to commercial use D. Pay any required additional sewer and water connection fees VI A. Allow Child Care Centers only in the following districts and only as a conditional use: L-0, C-N, C-C, RSC, C-G and OT and not in residential districts B. Follow Conditional Use procedures and fees now required by City C. Considered as commercial use and therefore must not violate restrictive covenants D. Pay any additional sewer and water connection fee VII Change idea on some home occupations to be accessory use--but not violate covenants--somewhat similar to Boise • May 3, 1988 The Honorable Grant Kingsford, Mayor Meridian City Council Meridian City Hall Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Sirs: KIDS (Beep In-home DaycareS) respectfully asks the Meridian City Council to conduct a public hearing to get public input on proper zoning requirements for child care homes. Child care providers and parents want to provide the -best care possible for our children. Current zoning law is a barrier to in-home care. We believe that in-home child care for twelve or fewer children in the care-giver's own home should be either a "permitted" or an "accessory" use in all residential neighborhoods. An "accessory use" permit application should be developed to provide for notification and meaningful input from neighbors and to protect the property values and character of the neighborhood. The child care home should be and remain primarily a home. KIDS believes that it is now time to allow the public some meaningful input into this discussion. That is why we are requesting a public hearing. • • We the undersigned are in support of KEEP IN-HCME DAYCARE 3 (KIDS) respectfully request a public hearing of zoning ordinances reguarding Daycare Homes. • • We the undersigned are in support of KEEP IN HOI~ DAYCARE 3 (KIDS) respectfully request a publ3.c hearing of zoning ordinances reguarding Daycare Homes. . ~~ ~ ~ p ,~ . ,moo ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~,.~ . o • • We the undersigned are in support of KEEP IN-HOI~ DAYCARE S (KIDS) respectfully request a public hearing of zoning ordinaxices reguarding Daycare Homea. May 3, 1988 • TO: MAYOR RINGSFORD AND THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL As working parents with small children, we are very concerned about the proposed child-care ordinance that you are considering. It is our understanding that the passing of such an ordinance will cause various home caretakers to have to stop child-care in their homes because of the cost connected with the permits they would be required to purchase in order to continue the home care. If the cost of the proposed permits are going to be at such an outrageous expense so as to cause small home child-care services to close up, where are working parents of Meridian to leave their children? Are new daycares to be provided in the City of Meridian? There is only one daycare center that we know of in Meridian at this time, and that is Greenleaf Friends Academy and this daycare always has a waiting list. So where are working parents living in and/or working in Meridian going to leave their children in Meridian, if current home caretakers cannot afford to pay for the proposed permits? It appears to us that this ordinance is going to fonce working parents to take their children into Boise for daycare services. It appears to us that Boise will receive the revenues that the Meridian City Council are seeking, not the City of Meridian. If we are required to seek daycare services in Boise, then we might as well take all of our business to Boise since well be there on a daily basis. We understand that in view of all the difficulties and stories that we hear concerning problems with child-care facilities, the City is trying to protect our children. But with the kind of ordinance that the City is proposing, they are going to be causing a great hardship to home caretakers, working parents of Meridian, and most importantly, causing a terrible hardship on our Meridian children who are going to be forced into Boise daycares, filled with hundreds of children, rather than feeling secure in a home atmosphere in their own hometown. How can you even expect home child-caretakers to be able to afford to buy expensive permits? d • Mayor Kingsford and the Meridian City Council May 3, 1988 Page 2 Please take a better look at this proposed ordinance. Surely you can come up with something that does not cause so many difficulties for working parents and-their children. We are very concerned about our children and very concerned that our children will have to go to a Boise daycare should this ordinance be passed. Thank you for giving this letter your consideration. Yours truly, ~~ David and Laurie Rehder 1887 Tana Ct. Meridian, Idaho J- U-B ENG/ NEERS, 1 NC. 250 South Beachwood Avenue, Suite I • Bolse, Idaho 83709 • Telephone (208) 376-7330 April 20, 1988 Mr. Jack H. Niemanrrt, City Clerk CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 East Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 Dear Mr. Niemann: This letter, on behalf of BEDELCO, Inc., is to request an extension of time on the approval for the Meridian Manor No. 5 Subdivision Plat. The City of Meridian approved this plat some time ago but, as of this date, it is still inappropriate to record the final plat. Therefore, we respectfully request an extension of time in order for the project to be in conformance with the City of Meridian's plat process. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, SMJ:ss cc: Mr. Ed Bevis • • 1St ~r fessiona~ ~nsurance~ Ser~rtces rson 1434 N. Meridian Street • Meridian, Idaho 83642 • (208) 888-1375 April 21, 1988 T0: Mayor Kingsford & Council Members First let us say thank you for your cooperation and assistance, it has been greatly appreciated. We have given great consideration to the numerous comments and opinions concerning proper parking arrangements for our office. We have reached the conclusion that removing the garage and entering from the north side would best suit our current and future needs. This also seems to be best in your opinion as well. We will begin work soon and will communicate with Jack Niemann and Bob Mitich for proper permits and complying with codes. We will try to sell that garage first rather than having it destroyed. If that fails after 30 days it will be torn down. The entire project including asphalt will be completed no later than August 31, 1988. If this proposal is satisfactory to you, please respond and work will begin. Sincerely, _r .. ~~'.``-~-- .fr ..__ -I-~r-~~' Steven C. Anderson WesLee Hoalst SA,WH:ab ~% l ~~ 'Turn Off scheduled fo~ay 11,1988 • ` Turn Off Meeting May 988 Account# Name & Address Amount Due 24 LEONARD MCFADDEN 49.30 710 W. 2nd St 54 MILDRED C. JOHNSOPJ 39.05 330 W. BROADWAY 115 MARK S. HALVERSON 31.60 720 W. 8th 382 STAN LANTZ 44.15 608 W. 3rd 469 TECO INVESTMENTS 46.05 809 W. 2nd St 500 PEARL LAND & LIVESTOCK 128.50 422 W. Idaho 916 KEITH MOONEY 77.30 736 W. 1st St 960 KENTON S. TRAVIS 64.55 230 W. Pine Ave 3240 PAUL A. FLEMING 44.70 935 W. Pine 3274 JOE. E. RANDALL 155.30 801-803-821-823 W 7th St 3304 WILLIAM T. STEVENS 49.25 535 W. Pine 3314 DUANE A SPOOLSTRA 146.00 511 W. Pine 3436 WALLACE NEWTON 57.80 1523 West 1st St 5612 JOLAND DUSKIN 51.80 1430 W. 14th St 5620 RAYMOND BARRIATUA 51.80 1402 Northgate Ave 5698 GEORGE EARLEY 56.90 1536 N. Linder Rd. 5720 RAY HOLADAY 36.50 1439 Northgate Ave. 5736 EDDY R. LAW 23.35 1407 W. 14th St 5826 DWAYNE MORRISON 59.45 1121 W. 15th Ave. • • page 2 ACCOUNT # Name & Address Amount Due 5878 KAY FEIL 18.25 1036 W. 15th Ave 22506 JOHN MILLER 62.00 3531 Sugar Creek Dr 28862 H.D.CORNELL 36.50 1632 Todd Way 28930 GENE CHANTRILL 62.00 2415 W. CHATEAU DR. 30868 ROBERT C. UNGER 52.30 2203 Leann Way 30882 DENNIS FRYE 39::05 2070 Kristen Way 30964 ROBERT G. CHENEY 74.75 2638 Rebbecca Way 30990 CLINTON BARNHART 79.85 2580 Misty Dr 31046 GALE G. LIBERTY 72.20 2591 Rebecca Way 32320 RON L. ANDERSON 49.25 1891 Hendricks Ct 35348 ROBERT BEHNER 62.75 1531 Claire St. 35350 LEIGH EATON 41..60 1493 DARRAH DR. 35352 CAL PERMAN 72.20 1481 Darrah Dr. 35358 DAVID OUTRIGHT 21.60 1467 Darrah Dr. 37242 PAULA J. KOBER 63.80 1484 Darrah Dr 37255 FRED HUTH 72.20 1312 Claire St. 38275 SHARON JARETT 36.50 1542 Storey 38294 FRED M. STEWART 64.55 1411 Kingswood Ave 38408 PHILIP MARR 79.85 1509 Tana Dr page 3 . • • A000UNT# Name & Address Amount Due 38530 _ DENNIS NICK 64.55 1512 W. Chateau Ave 38572 ROGER G. JOHNSON 74.75 2229 N.W. 14th St 38602 ROBERT V WALLER 81.75 1085 W. Chateau Dr 38604 LINDA L. THOMPSON 62.00 1081 Wi Chateau Dr 38650 DAVID E. MCGOWAN 123.20 2211 N.W. 11th St 38766 JUDITH CRYER 54.35 811 Delmar Dr 38768 TERRY SELLMAN 51.80 810 Delmar Dr 39360 CHUCK BOOS 69.65 1910 Blossom P1 40132 DIANNA MAUS 40.65 667 Longford Dr 41208 ROGER F. BECKER 77.30 671 Tiffany Dr 41222 W.L. TULLOS 36.50 586 Tiffany Dr 41250 TOM KOBER 82..40 712 W. Willowbrook Dr. 41298 NELS M. HERRING 92:60 2049 Crestmont Dr. 41306 JEFF CHRISTENSEN 49.•25 626 McGlinchey 48542 EDWIN LEE BROWN 90.05 2167 Jericho Way 48818 DONALD. ROWAN 36:10 923 E. Willowbrook Dr 52964 MRS. JOHN PRATT 36.50 1420 E. 2 1/2 St 53786 SHEAR PLEASURE 36.50 17 E. Fairview 53800 APOLLO CLEANER 133.05 1535 E. 1st St 53802 TERRY WOODVGJARD 85.45 1535 E. 1st St page 4 . • • t D A ACCOUNT # Name & Address ue moun 56324 TERESA BENTLEY 78.40 518 E. Broadway Ave 56340 MONIKA LITTLE 51.80 412 E. Broadway 56712 REED ADAMS 56.35 516 E. Idaho 56836 JEFFEREY A. SCOTT 54.35 319 E. Pine Ave 58616 ROBERT SIMS 36.10 520 E. Pine 58542 KENNITH THOMSON 50.05 909 E. 4th St 58682 W.D. THOMPSON 51.80 924 E. 4th St 60306 GAIL FLORES 59:45 330 E. 3rd St 60350 EDITH CROCKETT 34.50 122 E. Ada Ave 60430 DAVID ROBERTS 42.50 133 E. King 60454 ESTER WARDLE 39.05 226 E. 3rd St 60544 LEE STOCKER 40.65 52 E. Franklin 61946 O.T.DAVIS 62:00 44 S. Meridian St 92130 ALLEN H. GIACOMINI 54.70 313 S.W. 7th Ave 92834 STEVEN E. TUCKER 33.55 768 Hanover Ct 92856 MARTY FLOWER 37.90 656 Fulmer Ct 92877 TODD HAMMONS 44.15 671 Barrett 96920 SHELLIE A. ALLEN 51.80 403 Meridian St. Grand Total Due 4,532.05 • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live OFFICIALS JANICE GASS, Treasurer rk BRUCE D STUARTIW t W S t CITY OF MERIDIAN . a er o s up . EARL WARD, WasKe Water sup homey 33 EAST IDAHO KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chlef ROY PORTER, Police Chlef MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 GARY SMITH, City Engineer Phone 888-4433 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor CITY OF MERIDIAN WIiEREAS, we see the nation as being in a time of much need - spirtually, socially, economically, and in other ways; and WHEREAS, by Joint Resolution of Congress approved in 1952, the recognition of a particular day set aside each year as a National Day of Prayer has become part of our unification as a great Nation. This is a day on which the people of the United States are invited to turn to God in prayer and meditation in places of worship or as groups and individuals; and WHEREAS, each President has proclaimed, annually, since 1952, a Day of Prayer to the Nation, resuming the tradition started by the Continental Congress. COUNCILMEN BILL BREWER RONALD R. TOLSMA J. E BERT MYERS ROBERT GIESLER WALT MORROW Chelrman Zoning & Planning NOW, THEREFORE, I, Grant P. Kingsford, Mayor of Meridian, Idaho, do hereby proclaim Thursday, May 5, 1988 as NATIONAL DAY OF FRAMER in Meridian, and I encourage all citizens of the Municipality to gather together on that day for 5 minutes, at noon to pray in his or her manner, for unity of the hearts of all mankind. Grant P. Kingsford, May r ` '~~r~~r~~~~~ PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, America depends upon successful school instructional programs that meet the needs of every child, and WHEREAS, America's teachers are carrying out a major responsibil- ity in preparing our young people to assume their role as effective citizens, and WHEREAS, teachers are challenged daily to reach out to every stu- dent-regardless of ability, interest in learning, social or economic background, handicap, race, religion, creed, or ethnic origin-to provide the assistance and guidance necessary for full intellectual development, and WHEREAS, teachers contribute to the economic growth of this nation by providing students the skills that make them a viable part of the work force, and WHEREAS, each of us can recall the personal attention that teachers gave to us as we made important decisions during the formative years of our lives, and WHEREAS, teachers are molding lives and shaping the future of our next generation, and WHEREAS, teachers represent an investment in this life of this com- munity and deserve the deepest respect and admiration of our citizens. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that May 3, 1988, is hereby proclaimed National Teacher Day as a time for public recog- nition of the contributions provided by the teacher toward the develop- ment of this community and for the influence of the teacher upon the lives of each of us. N Title Community ,,/~/f/l~~~ Signed this ~~'~ day of , 1988. ® ~.