Loading...
ACHD Comments.y 7~~~~~ CHD ~ (iom~wv~`esl~o SrirM~co May 2, 2008 TO: JE Development, LL.C 1854 E. Lanark St. Meridian, ID 83642 OWNER: Ross Erickson -Erickson Civil, Inc. "Same as above" SUBJECT: MCZC-08-019 Bellabrook Villas 300 S. Locust Grove Carol A. McKee, President Sherry R. Huber, 1st Vice President Dave Givens, 2nd Vice President John S. Franden, Commissioner Rebecca W. Arnold, Commissioner ~e~~v~~ MAY 0 6 2008 CIT`/ OF P~IERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE On July 25, 2006, the Ada County Highway District Planning Review Staff acted on MPP-06-038 for Bellabrook Subdivision. The conditions and requirements also apply to MCZC-08-019. Attached is the staff report that was previously issued for Bellabrook Subdivision and the letter referencing the changes made after the subdivision was accepted by ACHD planning and review staff. • Prior to final approval you will need to submit construction plans to the ACHD Development Review Department to insure compliance with the conditions identified above or for traffic impact fee assessment. This is a separate review process that requires direct plans submittal to the Development Review staff at the Highway District. • A traffic impact fee will be assessed by ACHD and will be due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Contact ACHD Planning 8~ Development Services at 387-6170 for information regarding impact fees. If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact this office at (208) 387-6177. Sincerely, ~~~~ ~~~~ Chelsee Kucera Right-of-Way and Development Services CC: Project File City of Meridian Ada County Highway District • 3775 Adams Street • Garden City, ID • 83714 • PH 208-387-6100 • FX 345-7650 • www.achd.ada.id.us Request for Appeal of Staff Decision Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual. a.. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs. b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from the date of the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection. c. Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply and any modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing on the appeal. d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing. e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at the hearing. Development Process Checklist ®Submit a development application to a City or to the County ®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD The ACHD Planning Review Division will receive the development application to review ®The Planning Review Division will do one of the following: ^Send a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific requirements at this time. Send a "Comply With" letter to the applicant stating that if the development is within a platted subdivision or part of a previous development application and that the site specific requirements from the previous development also apply to this development application. ^Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. ^Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. The Planning Review Division will hold a Technical Review meeting for all Staff and Commission Level reports. ^For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" or "Comply With" letter: • The applicant should submit a set of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development Review Division for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements required by ACRD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee calculation.) • The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHD) for ANY work in the right-of-way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts. ^Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval. DID YOU REMEMBER: Construction (Zone) ^ Driveway or Property Approach(s) • Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" form to Ada County Highway District (ACHD) Construction (for approval by Development Services & Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval. ^ Working in the ACRD Right-of-Way • Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit Application" to ACHD Construction -Permits along with: a) Traffic Control Plan b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt. Construction (Subdivisions) ^ Sediment 8 Erosion Submittal • At least one week prior to setting up a Pre-Con an Erosion 8 Sediment Control Narrative 8 Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be turned into ACRD Construction -Subdivision to be reviewed and approved by the ACRD Drainage Division. ^ Idaho Power Company • Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being scheduled. ^ Final Approval from Development Services ACHD Construction -Subdivision must have received approval from Development Services prior to scheduling aPre-Con. :~ ~~~~ CHD ~ lio.w,wL~`ecl ~o ~rivv~e:c~ March 26, 2007 TO: Ross Erickson 13318 Woodspring Court Boise, ID 83713 SUBJECT: Bellabrook Subdivision/MRZ07-006/MCUP07-005 300 S. Locust Grove Mulfi-family development John S. Franden, President Rebecca W. Arnold, Vice President Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Dave Givens, Commissioner Carol A. McKee, Commissioner On July 25th 2006 ACHD acted on the above referenced application. Since then, the applicant has redesigned the development to accommodate a higher density, with the internal roadway system constructed as private rather than public. As a result, ACHD does not have any requirements for the internal private roads, and the applicant should only comply with the improvement and right-of-way requirements for Locust Grove Road. Additionally, the applicant should submit construction drawings to the ACRD Development review prior to final approval, and pay all applicable review and impact fees. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Andrew Mentzer Planner I Right-of-way & Development Services CC: Project file, Construction Services, Utilities, City of Meridian Ada County Highway District • 3775 Adams Street • Garden City, ID • 83714 • PH 208 387 6100 • FX 345-7650 • www.achd.ada.id.us Right-of--Way & Development Services Department t ~~ ~` ~ ~ C D~ Ga„~,,,~`ed~o :~ Project/File: Lead Agency: Site address: Staff Level Approval: Applicant: Bellabrook/M PP-06-038/MAZ-06-040 Meridian City 300 S. Locust Grove July 25th 2006 Ross Erickson 13318 W. Woodspring Ct. Boise, ID 83713 Owner: Morgan & Marilyn Plant 300 S. Locust Grove Meridian, ID 83642 Representative: Erickson Civil 1854 E. Lanark Meridian, ID 83642 Staff Contact: Andrew Mentzer Phone: 387-6187 E-mail: amentzer(a~achd.ada.id.us Tech Review: July 21St 2006 Application Information: Acreage: 4.38 Current Zoning: RUT Proposed Zoning: R-8 Residential Lots: 20 A. Findings of Fact Existing Conditions 1. Site Information: The site is currently occupied by a rural residential structure. 2 Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area: Direction Land Use Zonin -North Church C-N 1 South Snortin Bull Sub R-4 East Residential R1 West Residential ~ R1 3. Existing Roadway Improvements & Right-of-Way Locust Grove Road is currently improved with 4 travel lanes, a center turn lane, paved shoulders, vertical curb, gutter and a 7-foot attached concrete sidewalk abutting the site. Locust Grove Road currently has 96-feet of right- of-way. 4. Existing Access: There is currently one curb return approach accessing the site from Locust Grove Road located approximately 90-feet south of the north property line.. 5. Site History: ACRD has not previously reviewed this site for a development application. Development Impacts Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate approximately 190 additional vehicle trips per day (10 existing) based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, single family dwelling land use designation. 2. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any building permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that time. 3. Traffic Impact Study: A traffic impact study was not required with this application. 4. Impacted Roadways: Roadway Frontage Functional Traffic Count Level of Speed Classification Service* Limit Locust Grove 390' Minor Arterial 1,796 south of Better 35 MPH Road Franklin on than "C" 09/14/2005 *Acceptable level of service fora 3 lane minor arterial is "D" (17,000 vTD). 5. Capital Improvements Plan/Five Year Work Program There are currently no roadways, bridges or intersections in the general vicinity of the project that are currently in the Five Year Work Program or the Capital Improvements Plan. Additionally, ITD is beginning construction of an overpass at Interstate 84 and Locust Grove this Fall. B. Findings for Consideration 1. Locust Grove Road Right-of-Way Policy: District policy requires 96-feet of right-of-way on arterial roadways (Figure 72-F1 B). This right-of-way allows for the construction of a 5-lane roadway with curb, gutter, 5-foot concrete detached sidewalks and bike lanes. Sidewalk Policy: District policy requires 7-foot wide attached (or 5-foot detached) concrete sidewalk on all collector roadways and arterial roadways (7204.7.2). 2 Applicant Proposal: The applicant has not proposed to dedicate any additional right-of-way or construct any improvements for Locust Grove Road. Staff Recommendation: Due to the fact that Locust Grove Road is built out to a 5-lane arterial standard, the applicant should not be required to construct any further improvements, or dedicate any additional right-of-way. Locust Grove Road was rebuilt in 2005, thereby restricting utility cuts until March of 2010. Additionally, the slope abutting the right-of-way is located within a permanent easement due to the fact that it supports the road. Any work done to this easement (landscaping or otherwise) will require ACHD approval and any applicable license agreements. 2. Internal Streets Right-of-Way Policy: District policy 7204.4.1 and Figure 72-F1A requires 50-feet of right-of-way on local streets. This right-of-way allows for the construction of a 2-lane roadway with curb, gutter and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks. Street Section Policy: District policy 72-F1A, allows local residential public roads with a 33-foot street section with parking on both sides of the roadway, if the amount of vehicle trips per day on the street does not exceed 1,000 and the appropriate fire department reviews and approves the street section. The proposed density of development that will utilize the internal local residential streets is anticipated to generate less than 1,000 vehicle trips per day. Roadway Offset Policy: District policy 7204.11.6, requires local roadways to align or offset a minimum of 300-feet from an arterial roadway (measured centerline to centerline). Island Policy: District policy 7202.7 and 7207.5 require islands to be constructed a minimum of 4- feet wide with a minimum area of 100-square feet and designed to safely channel traffic. The roadway on either side of the traffic island should maintain a minimum of a 21-foot street section. District policy also requires any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat should be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this should be required on the final plat. The design should be reviewed and approved by ACHD's Development staff. Applicant Proposal (Internal streets): The applicant is proposing to construct the internal streets as 34-foot street sections (34-feet back-to-back) with rolled curb, gutter, and 5-foot attached concrete sidewalks within 42-feet of right-of-way. A 1-foot sidewalk easement has been proposed for the improvements located outside of the right-of-way. Additionally, the applicant has proposed a center landscape island near the intersection of Locust Grove and E. Kalispell Drive (the site's entry road). The applicant has proposed 21-foot street sections around the proposed island. E Kalispell Drive aligns with the approach across Locust Grove. The applicant has proposed a knuckle without an island at the southwest corner of the intersection of E. Bellalucca Street and S. Truss Avenue. Staff Comment/Recommendation: The applicant should be required to construct the site's internal streets as 34-foot street sections (34-feet back-to-back) with rolled curb, gutter, and 5-foot attached concrete sidewalks within 42-feet of right-of-way, as proposed. The proposed island near the intersection of Locust Grove and E. Kalispell Drive meets policy, and should be approved and noted on the final plat. Any sidewalk improvements located outside of the right-of-way should have an easement for public access. E. Kalispell Drive should align with the existing access on the west side of Locust Grove Road,. and the knuckle without an island at the southwest corner of the intersection of E. Bellalucca Street and S. Truss Avenue should be approved, as proposed. 3. Tree Planters 3 Tree Planter Policy: The District's Tree Planter Width Interim Policy prohibits all trees in .planters less than 6-feet in width. In addition to prohibiting trees in planters less than 6-feet in width, the policy requires a minimum planter width of 6-feet for class II tress with the installation of root barriers on both sides of the .planter strip or a minimum planter width of 8-feet without the installation of a root barrier. The policy also requires Class I and Class III trees to provide a minirnum planter width of 10-feet. 4. Stub Streets Stub Street Policy: District policy 7203.5.1 states that the street design in a proposed development. shall cause no undue hardship to adjoining property. An adequate and convenient access to adjoining property for use in future development may be required. If a street ends at the development boundary, it shall meet the requirements of sub section 7205, "non-continuous streets." District policy 7205.5 states that stub streets will be required to provide intra-neighborhood circulation or to provide access to adjoining properties. Stub streets will conform with the requirements described in Section 7204.5, 7204.6 and 7204.7, except a temporary cul-de-sac will not be required if the stub street has a length no greater than 150-feet. A sign shall be installed at the terminus of the stub street stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE." In addition, a stub street must meet the following conditions: 1. A stub street shall be designed to slope towards the street intersection and drain surface water toward that intersection, unless a satisfactory storm drain system is installed. 2. The District may require appropriate covenants guaranteeing that the stub street will remain free of obstructions. Applicant Proposal: The applicant has proposed one stub street to the east with this application, to be located approximately 175-feet south of the north property line (offsetting Bellalucca Street by approximately 95-feet). Staff Comment/Recommendation: The proposed stub street to the east does not meet District offset policy; however the applicant has agreed to extend the right-of-way for S. Torino Avenue to the east property line in lieu of constructing the stub. This will provide connectivity when the parcel to the east redevelops, and give flexibility in meeting roadway offsets in the future. Notation of the purpose of this right-of-way should be on the final plat. District Traffic Services will need to approve the exact location of a road extended to the east in the future. Note to the City of Meridian: It is the desire of ACRD to see a future connection to the parcel to the east. District Traffic Services has reviewed the site plan, and indicated that right-of-way to the property line will provide the opportunity to meet District policy in the future. Additionally, the roadway offset for E. Kalispell Drive should not be of concern due to the relatively low volume of traffic generated by this development, as well as the fact that all lots have two ways to get to Locust Grove Road (from S. Truss Avenue and E. Kalispell Drive). C. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. Construct the site's internal streets as 34-foot street sections with rolled curb, gutter, and 5-foot concrete sidewalks within 42-feet of right-of-way; and provide an easement for any sidewalk improvements located outside of the right-of-way. 2. Construct the center island on Kalispell Drive with a minimum 21-foot street section on either side, in compliance with District policy requirements. 4 3. Construct a knuckle without an island at the southwest corner of the intersection of E. Bellalucca Street and S. Truss Avenue, as proposed. 4. Construct Kalispell Drive in alignment with the existing access on the west side of Locust Grove Road, as proposed. 5. Close any unused access to Locust Grove Road not specifically approved with this application to match existing improvements. 6. No cuts are allowed to Locust Grove Road until March, 2010. 7. Obtain District approval and any applicable license agreements for the use of the supporting slope abutting the right-of-way on Locust Grove Road. 8. Extend the right-of-way for S. Torino Avenue to the east property line to provide future connectivity to the adjacent parcel, noted on the final plat. 9. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. D. Standard Conditions of Approval Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way. 2. Private sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within any ACHD roadway or right-of-way. 3. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 5. Comply with the District's Tree Planter Width Interim Policy. 6. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. 7. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACRD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 8. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 9. Construction, use and .property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 10. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #200, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 5 11. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The applicant at no cost to ACRD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 12. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 13. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. E. Conclusions of Law The proposed site plan is .approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are satisfied. 2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Attachments 1. Vicinity Map 2. Site Plan 3. Appeal Guidelines 4. Development Process Checklist 6 j' F~ -E .. ,~tt~. ., v 3 r .. r ~= - ~, ' ~~'~Y~ 1Ij~ ,,~ { ~ - .1 ~~Pll~l'Sr - ~~iW ~~,,~~ 1 !~ ~h ~ ~- ~ J 1~~~ ~j _._ '.~irr ~~,~ ~.~ ~ I ~ ~~ '; _ ~PIPPR~ ~~~ ~ ~ __ _ ~ r 1 ~~, ,~' I~. ~ ~~' ~, , ~o/° ~. _._.~.~, ~~ .t _~ ~ - ~ - .. ~"~` -- ,1 , l !~ ~__ ~ ~ t ,~ ~ a ~ )fit ~ ~ ~ r .Y(79,.. ~G tit ~•y ~ ~l ~ -. ~i r , ~ ~ ~ ''tlS~i~1 t~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~5 ~~ ~~ ,~~~ ~ ~~. ~ t - 1 ~ t l„ _- _ ~ ~ I~ff1U ~ 1 71 ii ., _ ~ _., FF a 1 r f ~a ~ _ ~ ~ `'~ lip ~ 7 ~~ ~4 1 --'~ _ - - _ i ~~ ~~, \ '.( ~ ,,~ _ ~`''''YDi~" ~',';?BQ1'VSTRiN ~., / ~'~~,,~, ~ y~! sBQ1~`STRINC ti , ~_ . ~,,'~w'ATE~RTUW~R,.__ ;~. _ . ,,i , rrf° s" ~,"~~ ,jJ ~(~ r,,.~ ,:, ,,~ - - - _ tq °~ ~ ~~ __ ty~`: !~ ~, _~~J ~. 4 , `r..~._ ~ ~~I~r~.~ ~ ~L~.e,. ~' .. ~, ~1 i~ ~~~' ~~T ~RP~IN~:R. r ~ ~~ `tee' ~ y_. - ~, ,. ~~ ~~, 5 . 'j ~~ ~.y ~y . ~ ~y ~~ ~ ~~ --- ,-.3~.~`~._.=~_x. .-~. _'-x ~ ~(t.~ ,~ ti~y ~"ii~~ ^+., r~~ ;5y:~ .';jam ` ~' ~ "lr~ 1' ~.,.,, r,r , ~ '. , ~ \c. i ~, ,, VPRA7T ix~ r;+ . ~a ~...~,, f ~ ~~ G , , ~, ~ 1,=~ ~I' . r , 1 '~ 7 ~g~ 5 i' ~ d !~ ~~ ~-r-~ f m a H Z Fv %F 6 ^ - --rrn a g a~ iR! ~ ~R~ ~ B4gpr~ ~ p ~ ~. ~~ _~~ ~'spk8 g~ ~g~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N IlY ~SPp ~~ q ~ ~ QAC =g 5~~ 6~ 9 bbbn CR g ~§ a~~a~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ $ ~{ ~ g a gE 5~ ~~~~~~~ ~ R AR~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R~~a g ~ ~~ b ~~~®a~ A~za ~ $ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ 'F ~i x~ ~C~I9 ~ ~~ ~ ~~i ~ ~~~ ; d p6 " Y G ~g ~~ e~ ~ F ~ 8 a~ ~~~~Q ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~.~ nA.~a b~sq ~~A~ ~~~ ~_-+- . .~.~... (`;\~ f0~`;~, 30 ~~ :O;k p ~ { ~•, i~ to 4 , g ~ I I SQ?~~`o-~••.••° 9~' • ~©i, i is Eo ~ , °'~ - _ . _ _' _ ,f ~ ~ ti -: ._, - ..b... .. ~~ e r ~ ~ ' ~ ~\ ~ ---- ~ f ~- - - - '' ~ ' ~` ,, % ~ ~ ~ • .•~.rtS ~J i _ __ g ~~ o` ._~ -- - - -- r vl ~ -- • - ,rte- _ k ~ ! . _,~ ,,,; a s ~~ .= i -- -- - ~ -ID- R~O -_______ _-- _- __ _. ii ~~ i li j ~ l i ii ~g~~ ~ ~~~~ ~9~ ~~~~ ~~g ~ ~i~'~ ~ ~ ~' ~A a Q goo ~_ '~ m Z D 0m A~ ~Zz p D A m~{ mm~ -~{ '~ DZ~ N?.~jm OD~r °'D~~ oZo cNo z~~ ~wC Z~ 0 A< 0 I ~Z m J m Request for Appeal of Staff Decision Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACRD Policy Manual. a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs. b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from the date of the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection. c. Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply, and any modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing on the appeal. d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing. e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at the hearing. 9 Development Process Checklist ®Submit a development application to a City or to the County ®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD ®The ACHD Planning Review Division will receive the development application to review ®The Planning Review Division will do one of the following: ^Send a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific requirements at this time. ^Send a "Comply With" letter to the applicant stating that if the development is within a platted subdivision or part of a previous development application and that the site specific requirements from the previous development also apply to this development application. Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. ^Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. ^The Planning Review Division will hold a Technical Review meeting for all Staff and Commission Level reports. ^For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" or "Comply With" letter: • The applicant should submit two (2) sets of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development Review Division for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements required by ACRD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee calculation.) • The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHD) for ANY work in the right-of-way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts. ^Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval. DID YOU REMEMBER: Constroction (Zone) ^ Driveway or Property Approaches) • Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" form to Ada County Highway District (ACHD) Construction (for approval by Development Services & Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval. ^ Working in the ACRD Right-of-Way • Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit Application° to ACHD Construction -Permits along with: a) Traffic Control Plan b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt. Construction (Subdivisions) ^ Sediment 8 Erosion Submittal • At least one week prior to setting up a Pre-Con an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be turned into ACHD Construction -Subdivision to 6e reviewed and approved by the ACHD Drainage Division. ^ Idaho Power Company • Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being scheduled. Final Approval from Development Services ACHD Construction -Subdivision must have received approval from Development Services prior to scheduling aPre-Con. 10