Gail Carrithers AUP
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
B. GAIL CARRITHERS
ACCESSORY USE PERMIT FOR OPERATION OF
A FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME
1060 TAMMY PLACE
MERIDIAN, IDAHO
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The above entitled matter having come on for public hearing on
July 8, 1997, at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m., at the Meridian
City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, the Applicant, B.
Gail Carrithers, appearing in person, the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of Meridian having duly considered the
evidence and the matter makes the following Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1 . A notice of the application was mailed by certified mail,
return receipt requested, to owners of property which abuts the
external lot or boundary lines of the property, including
properties across the street, alley and kitty corner to the
propertYi a notice of the application was published for two (2)
consecutive weeks; a notice of the public hearing on the
application for the accessory use permit was published for two (2)
consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for
July 8, 1997, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days
prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the
July 8, 1997 hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 1.
B. GAIL CARRITHERS - ACCESSORY USE PERMIT
express connnents and submit evidence; and that copies of all
notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations.
2. The property included in the application for the
accessory use permit is described in the application, and by this
reference is incorporated herein as if set forth in full.
This
property is located within the City of Meridian, Ada County, state
of Idaho at 1060 Tammy Place.
3. Pursuant to the application, the Applicant is the owner
of record of the propertYi the property is currently zoned (R-8)
Medium Density Residential District; the property is contained in
the Settler's Village Subdivision; the surrounding properties are
residential homes; the Applicant requests an accessory use permit
for the operation of a Family Child Care Home; there exist no
accessory uses of a similar nature in the area; and the Applicant
agrees to pay increased sewer, water or trash fees if such are
required due to increased use.
4. The Applicant testified substantially as follows. She is
a family home child care provider.
She and her family recently
relocated to Meridian, Idaho from Vancouver, Washington. She was
a licensed day care provider in Vancouver, Washington. In her day
care, she provides a safe and secure environment for the children
to learn and play. She teaches the children to be good citizens,
to respect one another and other people's property. At no time
would the children in her care be allowed to run wildly through the
neighborhood. She is aware of the limited parking space available
in the culdesac in which the property is located.
She does not
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 2.
B. GAIL CARRITHERS - ACCESSORY USE PERMIT
feel that the limited parking space will be a problem; the property
has sufficient room to accommodate four vehicles in addition to her
own. It has been her experience that rarely two parents arrive to
pick up the children at the same time. She can easily handle the
parking for the parents. She feels her day care will be an asset
to the community by providing quality care and teaching good moral
standards.
She feels that she has met the requirements for an
accessory use permit and would like one to be granted to her.
5. In response to questions of Connnissioner MacCoy I the
Applicant testified substantially as follows. She has received the
City staff's comments on this application. She has reviewed said
comments and does not have a problem with any of them. However,
her understanding is unclear as to being charged a commercial use
rate. She does not have a problem with such use rate if such rate
does not take effect until she has been in business, and it is
determined that such rate should apply. She is willing to enter
into an assessment agreement.
She, understands that the City of
Meridian will permit her to watch, in addition to her children,
three children; she is permitted to watch a total of five children.
Because of the age of her children, she plans to keep the group of
children at approximately the same age; three to eleven years old.
The chance of increased water usage is unlikely based upon three
additional children and a few more diapers.
As requested, she
plans to obtain a child care license from the state of Idaho.
However, she understands that she does not need a day care license
to start a day care in the City of Meridian. To make it clear, she
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 3.
B. GAIL CARRITHERS - ACCESSORY USE PERMIT
plans to secure a child care license, but she does not want to wait
to commence her day care until she secures the day care license.
She believes the City of Meridian will allow her to start her day
care, without the license, but she does not want to violate any
requirement. She does not plan to change or alter the front of her
house. She does not like the idea of signage. No modifications or
changes to the property or house are needed for the day care. She
has been in the child care profession for a while, and her top
priority is the safety of the children.
She does not allow her
children to be in the front yard, without an adult present. The
property has a large backyard for the children to play, which is
fully enclosed. She has locks and plans to pad lock the two gates
on her property. Wi th regard to the neighborhood and noise,
children live behind the property and in the neighborhood. She
does not believe that three additional children will. create a noise
problem. Of the three additional children, she plans to accept all
children, whether handicapped or not; however, she does not know
whether such type of demand exists in the City of Meridian. She
believes her house will presently acconnnodate handicapped children,
but will construct a ramp into the house if necessary. When she
was in Vancouver, Washington, she did not care for any handicapped
children.
Handicapped children typically need more specialized
care. Consequently, she does not receive requests to care for such
children. Based upon her review of the covenants applicable to the
subdivision in which the property is located, the type of day care
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 4.
B. GAIL CARRITHERS - ACCESSORY USE PERMIT
she desires is not prohibited.
If the covenants had prohibited
such type of day care, she would not have purchased the house.
6. In response to a question of Commissioner Borup, the
Applicant testified substantially as follows. She believes that
she is not required to have a license for this type of day care;
however, because she intends to secure a license from the state of
Idaho, and she has not been concerned with the requirements.
7. In response to questions of Chairman Johnson, the
Applicant testified substantially as follows. The anticipated and
ideal hours of the day care are either 6:00 or 7:00 a.m. to 6:00
p.m.
She does not know the need in the city of Meridian; these
hours were her hours in Vancouver, Washington. However, she does
not want to limit herself to these hours in the event she needs
greater hours.
Providing this type of care is her source of
income. Her family needs her income in addition to.her husband's.
Consequently, if a person worked late hours or the "grave yard"
shift and needed to have a child or children watched, she would be
willing to accept such child or children. However, she does not
intend to operate a 24-hour day care. The people are not going to
be coming and going at all hours of the day and night.
Consequently, she does not know the precise hours of operation.
She is aware of and has read the letter submitted from her
neighbors located at 1066 Tammy whose last name is Michaelson.
With regard to the sketch she submitted, the driveway on the
property is the parking area for the day care. This sketch is not
specifically detailed, because she did not know such additional
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 5.
B. GAIL CARRITHERS - ACCESSORY USE PERMIT
detail was required.
She provided in the sketch the general
location of the house, the play area and other amenities on the
property.
8. The Applicant further testified that she would be the
only person working in the day care. There exists no open waters
such as ditches or swimming pools on the property.
9. A letter, dated June 13, 1997 and signed by James D.
Michaelson and Betty M. Michaelson, was submitted to the Planning
and Zoning Commission in objection to the application, which letter
is incorporate herein as if set forth in full.
This letter
provides:
Petition to stop application for accessory use permit for
family child care center at 1060 Tammy Place (St.)
Refer to Restrictions Conditions & Covenants of Settler
Village Subdivision dated 24 May 1983) (UWhat good are
covenants if they are ignored.") section # 1 Fully-
protected Residential Area.
Section # 8 Parking No recreation vehicles trailers
automobiles boats or other vehicles shall be parked
permanently on streets. All permanent parking shall be
in garages or attached driveways. This is where my
concerns comes in. This is a very small cul-de-sac.
There are more cars than there is parking spaces unless
you park in the driveways or middle of street.
Section No signs.
Section Amendments
Three-fourth of the property owners have to approve any
amendments in this subdivision.
10. At the hearing, John Michaelson submitted a document
containing three pages, which document is incorporated herein as if
set forth in full.
Mr. Michaelson testified concerning this
application substantially as follows. He is not the villain, does
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 6.
B. GAIL CARRITHERS - ACCESSORY USE PERMIT
not oppose children or day cares; he is in favor of day cares. He
has four children, ten grandchildren and one great grandchild who
needs a day care.
He is opposed to the application because the
covenants, conditions and restrictions of the subdivision prohibit
such use. with regard to the document he submitted, part of the
document is a portion of revised covenants, conditions and
restrictions (CC&Rs) of Settlers Village Subdivision in which the
property is located.
These CC&Rs provide that block 3, lots 1
through 68 of the subdivision are a fully protected residential
area. The property is lot 59 and lot 60. The CC&Rs provide that
in the residential area, no lot shall be used except for
residential purposes. Also part of the document submitted is the
sketch of the property which he corrected as to measurements. He
is concerned about parking. There are seven houses and 20 cars.
with regard to the parking, he is concerned about the traffic from
parents dropping off and picking up their children.
11. Don Day testified substantially as follows.
He is
opposed to the application because the covenants, conditions and
restrictions of the subdivision prohibit such use.
He does not
believe the driveway on the property has enough area for sufficient
parking. He purchased his house because it is on a culdesac, and
he knew there would not be much traffic. Accordingly, he objects
to the application.
12. In response to questions of Commissioner Borup, Mr. Day
testified substantially as follows. He objects to the application
based upon an increase in traffic and parking in the culdesac.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 7.
B. GAIL CARRITHERS - ACCESSORY USE PERMIT
13. Deborah Pence testified substantially as follows. She
does not believe traffic is an issue. Her observations have been
that there has not been significant traffic created by this type of
day care, and parking has not been a problem when dropping off or
picking up the children.
She does not anticipate traffic or
parking problems in the culdesac.
She does not believe her
children's activities in the neighborhood will be restricted as a
result of the day care, including the traffic or parking associated
with the day care. She does not believe there will be an noise
impact from the children at the day care. She believes another day
care in the City of Meridian would be beneficial, because of the
growth and safe places to take children. There is a demand for day
care in the City of Meridian; the day cares in the City of Meridian
are few and hard to find.
Accordingly, she is in favor of the
application.
14. In response to questions of Conunissioner Borup, Ms. Pence
testified substantially as follows. There exist other day cares in
her neighborhood; two at the intersection of Chateau and Jericho
and another on Tara.
These day cares are approximately a block
away from her house.
There exist other day cares in the
neighborhood, none of which, to her knowledge, are licensed day
cares.
15. Elizabeth Ahlestrom testified substantially as follows.
She concurs with the comments of Deborah Pence. She is a stay at
home mother.
Her children often ride their bikes through the
culdesac. She has observed the traffic and she does not think it
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 8.
B. GAIL CARRITHERS - ACCESSORY USE PERMIT
is a problem. The traffic created results only from dropping off
and picking up the children.
The dropping off and picking up
occurs in a very short period of time.
She is in favor of the
application.
16. Betty Michaelson testified substantially as follows. She
lives next door to the property. She loves children; however, she
and her husband are retired and bought their home for retirement.
She is concerned about access to the culdesac during the winter.
The snow that gathers inhibits the movement of traffic in the
culdesac.
She believes the snow will create a problem with
dropping off and picking up the children.
17. Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to the City Engineer, and
Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, submitted connnents
which comments are incorporated herein as if set forth in full.
Their comments included the following:
a. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance
with Section 11-2-414 of the City of Meridian Zoning and
Development Ordinance;
b. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as
not to illuminate directly any nearby residential areas,
and in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-2-414
D.3;
c. No signage shall be allowed;
d. Sanitary sewer and water to this facility would be
via existing service lines. This site currently is
assessed with one water hookup and one sewer hookup.
Assessments for sewer and water service will be reviewed
to see if additional load would justify an adjustment.
The Applicant is to provide any information that she may
have with regard to her anticipated water demand. The
Applicant will be required to enter into an Assessment
Agreement with the City of Meridian prior to operation.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 9.
B. GAIL CARRITHERS - ACCESSORY USE PERMIT
The use shall be considered a commercial use and charged
commercial rates;
e. Zoning Certificate and Certificate of Occupancy for
the daycare are required prior to operation;
f. Screened trash enclosures are to be provided in
accordance with City ordinance;
g. The Family Child Care Home shall not adversely
impact surrounding properties due to children's noise,
traffic and other activities;
h. The Applicant shall secure and maintain a child care
license from the Idaho State Department of Health and
Welfare-Child Care Licensing Division;
i. The Applicant shall provide for screening of
adjacent properties to protect children from adverse
impacts and to provide a buffer between properties;
j. The Applicant shall provide for a fence of
appropriate height/construction, to enclose play areas;
k. If the accessory use permit is approved, the
Applicant is to schedule an appointment with the Meridian
Fire Department for inspection prior to operating.
Operation of daycare without proper approvals will result
in revocation of accessory use permit;
l. Family child care homes are defined as a child care
facility which provides care for five (5) or fewer
children throughout th~ day. This includes the
provider's own children; and
m. Violation of any of the above conditions shall be
cause to revoke a zoning certificate for a Family Child
Care Home.
18. The Meridian City Police Department submitted comments,
which respective comments are hereby incorporated herein as if set
forth in full.
19. Meridian Fire Department submitted comments, which
comments are hereby incorporated herein as if set forth in full; as
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 10.
B. GAIL CARRITHERS - ACCESSORY USE PERMIT
long as all codes are met, it will not have a problem with the
accessory use permit.
20. The Central District Health Department submitted
comments, which comments are hereby incorporated herein as if set
forth in full. Its comments included that after written approval
from appropriate entities are submitted, it can approve this
application for central sewage and central water; and it will
require plans be submitted for a plan review for a child care
center.
21. There was no further testimony given at the hearing.
22. Pursuant to section 11-2-409 A, Zoning Schedule of Use
Control of the Zoning And Development Ordinance of the City of
Meridian, the operation of a Family Child Care Home on property
zoned (R-8) Medium Density Residential District is permitted by and
requires an accessory use permit.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. All the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act
and of the Ordinances of the Ci ty of Meridian have been met
including: the mailing of notice of the application by certified
mail, return receipt requested, to owners of property which abut
the external lot or boundary lines of the property, and properties
across the street, alley and kitty corner to the property; a notice
of the application was published for two (2) consecutive weeks; and
a notice of the public hearing on the application for the accessory
use permit was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 11.
B. GAIL CARRITHERS - ACCESSORY USE PERMIT
said public hearing scheduled for July 8, 1997, the first
publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing.
2. The City of Meridian has authority to grant accessory
uses pursuant to 11-2-410 D of the Zoning and Development Ordinance
of the City of Meridian.
3. The City of Meridian has authority to place conditions on
an accessory use permit.
4. The City of Meridian has the authority to take judicial
notice of its own ordinances and proceedings, other governmental
statutes and ordinances, and of actual conditions existing within
the City and state of Idaho.
5. The Zoning and Development Ordinance of the City of
Meridian defines "Accessory Use Or Structure," at Section 11-2-403
B as follows:
Accessorv Use or Structure - A use or structure on the
same lot with, and of a nature customarily incidental and
subordinate to, the principal use or structure. An
accessory use or structure does not alter the essential
characteristics of the principal permitted use and does
not include a building which is defined herein as a
dwelling unit.
The Zoning and Development Ordinance of the City of Meridian
defines "Dwelling Unit.. at Section 11-2-403 B as follows, "Dwellinq
Unit - Any building or portion thereof which meets adopted<building
codes and is used as a residence or living quarters of one or more
persons."
6. Section 11-2-410 D 1. of the Zoning and Development
Ordinance of the City of Meridian provides in part:
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 12.
B. GAIL CARRITHERS - ACCESSORY USE PERMIT
a. The accessory determination shall be based upon the
relationship of the building, structure or use to
the principal permitted use. Specifically, it must
be habitually or commonly established as reasonably
incidental" to the principal permitted use and
located and conducted on the same premises as the
principal permitted use. In determining whether it
is necessary, the following factors shall be used:
(1) The size of the lot in question;
(2) The nature of the principal permitted use;
(3) The use made of adjacent lots;
( 4 ) The actual incidence of similar use in the
area;
(5) The potential for adverse impact on adjacent
property; and
(6) The applicant must be the owner of the
property under consideration and the user of
the accessory use.
bo Family child care homes and home occupations may be
considered to be permissible accessory uses in the
R-4 and R-8 Residential Districts if they are
approved after applying the following additional
review procedures and the applicable accessory use
standards of Section 11-2-410D2:
* * * *
( 3 ) The applicant shall be required to pay any
additional sewer, water and trash charges or
fees, if any are requiredo
( 4 ) The use shall be considered as a commercial
useo
* * * *
7. The property is currently zoned (R-8) Medium Density
Residential District. The surrounding properties are zoned (R-8)
Medium Density Residential District, and are residential homes.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 13.
B. GAIL CARRITHERS - ACCESSORY USE PERMIT
8. The Zoning and Development Ordinance of the City of
Meridian defines "Family Child Care Home," at Section 11-2-403 B as
follows:
Child Care Facilitv - Any home, structure, or place where
nonmedical care, protection, or supervision is regularly
provided to children under fourteen (14) years of age,
for periods less than twenty four (24) hours per day,
while the parents or guardians are not on the premises.
There are three (3) types of child care facilities:
1 . Family Child Care Home - A child care facility
which provides care for five (5) or fewer children
throughout the day.
* * * *
It should be noted that in determining the type of child
care facility that is being operated, the total number of
children cared for during the day and not the number of
children at the facility at anyone time is
determinative.
9. Section 11-2-410 D 2. b. of the Zoning and Development
Ordinance of the City of Meridian sets forth the standards under
which the Planning and Zoning Commission shall review applications
for accessory use permits. This section provides:
Family Child Care Home Standards: It is the. intent of
this provision to provide for accessory family child care
homes which will not adversely impact surrounding
properties due to children1s noise, traffic and other
activities, and which are located away from and properly
screened from adverse impacts to the health, safety and
welfare of the children. The following conditions shall
apply:
(1) Secure and maintain a child care license from the
Idaho State Department of Health and Welfare-Child
Care Licensing Division if required.
( 2 ) Acquire an occupancy certificate and/or building
permit.
(3) Provide one off-street parking space per employee
which may be the driveway to the home.
(4) Provide for child pick-up area located off of
arterial or collector streets.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 14.
B. GAIL CARRITHERS - ACCESSORY USE PERMIT
(5)
Provide for screening of adjacent properties to
protect children from adverse impacts and to
provide a buffer between properties.
(6)
Provide for
construction,
children from
streets.
a fence of appropriate height/
to enclose play areas, protecting
traffic on arterial or collector
10. This application for an accessory use permit has been
judged upon the applicable standards and guidelines set forth in
Section 11-2-410 D of the Zoning and Development Ordinance of the
City of Meridian basis of guidelines, the record submitted to it
and the things of which the City of Meridian may take judicial
notice.
11. Applications of this nature are difficult because,
notwithstanding objections from neighbors,
the Zoning and
Development Ordinance of the City of Meridian provides that the
requested use is permitted as an accessory use if the standards are
met. The Planning and Zoning Commission concludes, considering the
applicable standards and guidelines set forth in Section 11-2-410
D of the Zoning and Development Ordinance of the City of Meridian,
the record submitted to it and the things of which the City of
Meridian may take judicial notice, the Applicant has met the
standards. Consequently, if the neighbors' objections are allowed
to control it is not government by law. The law controls and the
application for an accessory use permit shall be granted, and the
use allowed subject to the conditions imposed.
12. Because conditions may be placed upon the grant of an
accessory use permit, the Planning and Zoning commission concludes
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 15.
B. GAIL CARRITHERS - ACCESSORY USE PERMIT
that the following conditions of the grant of the accessory use are
required, to wit:
a. As the ordinances of the City of Meridi~n only allow up
to five (5) children under the Family Child Care Home,
the Applicant shall be limited to a maximum of five (5)
children, including her own children, to be cared for
under this accessory use permit;
b. The Applicant shall provide for a fence of appropriate
height and construction, to enclose play areas,
protecting the children from traffic, whether or not the
traffic is on arterial or collector streets;
c. The Applicant shall keep the children in the fenced yard
at all times except for drop-off and pick-up times when
the parents shall be required to bring the children into
the Applicant1s home and come into the home to pick the
children up. The children shall at no time be allowed
out side of the fenced area when not accompanied by an
adult;
d. The Applicant shall secure and maintain a child care
license from the Idaho State Department of Health and
Welfare-Child Care Licensing Division;
e. The Applicant shall provide one off-street parking space
per employee, if any, which may be the .driveway to the
home;
f. The Applicant shall provide for child pick-up area
located off of any arterial or collector streets;
g. The Applicant shall provide for screening of adjacent
properties to protect children from adverse impacts and
to provide a buffer between properties;
h. The Applicant shall meet the comments, recommendations
and requirements of the City Engineer's office and the
Planning and Zoning Administrator, which include, but are
not limited to the following:
(1) Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance
with Section 11-2-414 of the City of Meridian
Zoning and Development Ordinance;
(2) Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as
not to illuminate directly any nearby residential
areas, and in accordance with City Ordinance
Section 11-2-414 D.3,
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 16.
B. GAIL CARRITHERS - ACCESSORY USE PERMIT
(3 )
(4 )
(5)
(6 )
(7)
( 8 )
( 9 )
No signage shall be allowed;
The Applicant shall provide any information that
she may have with regard to her anticipated water
demand, and the Applicant shall enter into an
Assessment Agreement with the City of Meridian
prior to operation. The use shall be considered a
commercial use and charged commercial rates;
The Applicant shall secure a Zoning Certificate and
Certificate of Occupancy for the Family Child Care
Home prior to operation;
The Applicant shall provide screened trash
enclosures in accordance with City ordinance;
The Family Child Care Home shall not adversely
impact surrounding properties due to the children's
noise, traffic and other activities;
The Applicant shall f.orthwi th schedule an
appointment with the Meridian Fire Department for
inspection prior to operating; and
The Applicant's operation of the Family Child Care
Home without proper approvals will result in
revocation of accessory use permit.
i. The Applicant shall meet and comply with the comments,
recommendations and requirements of the Meridian Police
Department, the Meridian Fire Department, the Meridian
Sewer Department, and the Central District Health
Department; and
j. Violation of any of the above conditions shall be cause
to revoke a zoning certificate for a Family Child Care
Home.
13. The above-conditions are concluded to be reasonable and
the Appl icant shall meet these conditions of the grant of the
application for an accessory use permit.
14. That testimony was given that stated the proposed use
would be in violation of the convenants, conditions and
restrictions (CC&Rs) of the subdivision in which the property is
located. It is concluded that the City of Meridian is not bound by
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 17.
B. GAIL CARRITHERS - ACCESSORY USE PERMIT
a subdivision's CC&Rs and does not have to follow them. However,
the City I S action in granting an accessory use permit does not
infer that proceedings cannot be instituted by a property owner to
enforce the CC&Rs against the Applicant.
APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian
hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions
of Law.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONER BORUP VOTED '1GP
COMMISSIONER MANNING VOTED AI3~
COIDUSSIONER MACCOY VOTED yeA
COMMISSIONER SMITH VOTED 11-8~G3Jrf
CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) VOTED
DECISION
The Planning and Zoning Commission hereby decides and hereby
approves the accessory use permit requested by the Applicant for
the property described in the application with the conditions set
forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, more
particularly set forth at paragraph 12. of the Conclusions of Law,
and that the property be required to meet the water and sewer
requirements, the fire and life safety codes, and the Uniform
Building Code, and other ordinances of the City of Meridian. The
accessory use shall be subject to annual review by the City upon
notice to the Applicant.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 18.
B. GAIL CARRITHERS - ACCESSORY USE PERMIT
accessory use shall be subject to annual review by the City upon
notice to the Applicant.
MOTION: JJ~.
APPROVED: ~
g(ttj17
DISAPPROVED:
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 19.
B. GAIL CARRITHERS - ACCESSORY USE PERMIT