The URL can be used to link to this page

Gemtone, Inc. Findings~~ ~"~ ~ i BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION GEMTON~, INC. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT--GENERAL FAIRVIEW AVENUE AND EAGLE ROAD MERIDIAN, IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled matter having come on for public hearing January 8, 1991, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m., the Petitioner appearing through Tom Wright, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian having duly considered the evidence and the matter, makes the following Findings of~Fact and Conclusions of Law: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That a notice of public hearing on the Conditional Use AMBROSE, F""'ERALD STON •..,d .on P.O. Boa 427 Mertdlan, Idaho 83642 Telephw~e 8684461 Permit was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for January 8, 1991, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the January 8, 1991 hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations. 2. That this property is located within the City of Meridian and is owned by the Petitioner, and is described in the lJ L • application, which description is incorporated herein as if set forth in full; the property is ~in the southeast and the southwest quadrants of the intersection of the Fairview Avenue and Eagle Road; Petitioners propose to develop the property in , mixed use fashion containing both Commercial and Light, Industrial uses as a planned unit development-general. 3. That the property is located in what is presently designated in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan as the Eastern Industrial Review Area; the Industrial Review Areas are generally addressed in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan at Page 15 and read as follows: INDUSTRIAL REVIEW AREAS: The Industrial Review Areas are an essent~a a ement of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Special uses of land must be recognized as having special needs and diverse impacts. Designating certain areas for business uses, as a method of guiding business expansion, is an appropriate approach to Meridian's economic future and provides for the essential difference between the City's business land market and the residential land market. The Comprehensive Plan intends to prepare for Meridian's business and employment future by reserving land for industrial, retail, commercial and office uses and so removing them from the categories of land on which , residential development can be proposed. In all review areas, detailed economic analysis is essential, so that the specifics of industrial plans, designs and development will be known. Each Industrial Review Area is recognized as possessing unique physical and locational characteristics, both natural and man-made, which make it a desireable business environment. These characteristics are relatively level topography, potentially good access to rail and freeway faci 1 ities, and being relatively free from environmental hazards. A specific set of policies has been prepared for the development of each of the Review Areas and is discussed in a later section of AMBROSE, the plan document. Fin"- ago ac oN 4. That .the specific Eastern Industrial Review Area is A nd C n P.O. Boa 427 Maldlan, ~dJw 83642 •i T~bphon~ 886.4461 (/l/ 'discussed at Page 19 of the Comprehensive Plan and reads as follows: EASTERN INDUSTRIAL REVIEW AREA/POLICIES: 1. It is the policy of the City of Meridian to encourage and promote the development of an interchange (egress and ingress) at the intersection of Eagle Road and Interstate I-84 by the Idaho Department of Transportation. (This policy was recently deleted from the Plan since the interchange has been constructed.) 2. It is the policy of the City of Meridian to encourage and promote the development of an overpass, if an interchange is not feasible, at the intersection of Locust Grove and I-84 by the Idaho Department of Transportation. 3. The character, site improvements and type of industrial developments should be harmonized with the residential area to the south (on the upper bench), the contiguous residential area to the east and north. 4. The utilization of the linear open space corridor of Five Mile Creek, which passes through the Eastern Industrial Review Area, should be maintained as natural resource for both aesthetic and environmental reasons. 5. That the l and i s presently zoned I-L, Light Industrial. 6. That a planned general development is defined as (follows: Planned General. Development (PD-G)~'- A development not otherwise ~stinguis a un er Tanned Commercial, Industrial, Residential Developments, or which in the proposed use of interior and exterior spaces requires unusual des ign flexibility to achieve a completely logical and complementary conjunction of uses and functions. This PD classification applies to essential public services, public or private recreation facilities,_insttutiona_l uses, Gommunity_ facilities or a PD which includes a mix of ,~' residential, commercial or industrial uses. J AMBROSE, FITZGERALD ~KSTON ~s end Ion P.u. Box 4T7 M~rldlan, IdaAo 83612 T~IpAone 888-~~61 7. That the Zoning Schedule of Use Control, 11-2-409 presently contains a category for general or industrial planned ..., snit developments; that the schedule allows a planned unit levelopment-general as a conditional use in the I-L; that a 'lanned Unit Development - Industrial is an allowed use in the '-L zone without a conditional use permit. 8. That the property to the west is vacant ground with AMBRDSE, F~T?~:ERALD CSTON .and ion P.O. Box 427 M~rldlan, Id~Ao 83642 T~Iphoti~ 888.4161 ;ome residential, farm and commercial uses; the property to the past is vacant property and farm ground with a few residences; .he property to the south is farm ground and Light Industrial; :he property to the north is farm ground and residences. 9. That proper notice has been given as required by law end all procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission gave been given and followed. 10. That part of the property has been platted and is presently developed with roads, curb and gutter and sidewalks in ome areas; there is one existing business in the area which is . freight and trucking depot; that the other portion of the ubject property has not been platted or developed; that the portion which has been platted has sewer and water lines nstalled. 11. That the Applicant has not submitted a petition signed ~y at least 75% of the people owning property within 300 feet of .he property indicating their approval of the use of the roperty as requested by Applicant as such is not required under he conditional use requirement in the I-L zone. 12. That the City of Meridian does have control guidelines nd requirements for planned developments in 11-9-607 and such are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. /_ f` ~~ CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met; including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property; 2. That the City of Meridian has authority to grant onditional uses pursuant to 67-5512, Idaho Code, and, pursuant to 11-2-418 of the Revised and Complied Ordinances of the City f Meridian, Idaho; 3. That the City of Meridian has authority to place onditions on a conditional use permit and the use of the roperty pursuant to 67-6512, Idaho Code, and pursuant to 11-2- 18(D) of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of eridian, Idaho; 4. That 11-2-418(C) of the Revised and Complied rdinances of the City of Meridian sets forth the standards under which the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City ouncil shall review applications for Conditional Use Permits; that upon a review of those requirements and a review of the acts presented and the conditions of the area,-the Planning and oning Commission concludes as follows: a. The use would, in fact, constitute and a conditional use permit would be required by ordinances. b. The proposed possible uses apparently would be harmonious with and in accordance with the. AMBROSE, FInt;ERALD Comprehensive Plan as amended, but the Zoning j 8 'STON Ordinance, as amended, requires a conditional use permit to allow the use.;' ,.~ .Ion P.O. Box 427 _ MaAdlan, Idaho 83842 TslsphoM 888~t401 (~` ~~l c. The proposed possible uses apparently would be designed and constructed, ~to be harmonious in appearance with the intended character of the general vicinity. d. That the proposed possible uses should not be hazardous nor should they be disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. e._ Sewer and water service are installed in some of the area.; f. The possible proposed uses would not create ;' excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and the possible,) proposed uses would not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. g. The proposed possible uses would apparently not involve a use, activity, process, material, equipment or conditions of operation that would be detrimental to person, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic or noise. h. Sufficient parking for the. property and the proposed use must be provided. i. The development and probable uses will likely not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance. 5. That all development in the area shall be contro]led and guided by design review, and shall be guided and controlled;' under 11-9-607, Planned Development, and shall meet- all of the , ordinances of the City of Meridian.;' J 6. That the application and .proposed possible uses are in A-aeaose, ~ERALO KSTON n~ .eelors P.O. Box 477 McAdlen, {Gho 83b12 Teleptane ggBjs61 compliance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and with the lranting of the Conditional Use, if done so, the application and proposed possible uses and development would be in compliance Frith the Zoning Ordinance. 7. That the granting of this application would be in the pest interest of the City of. Meridian. 1 .'~~•6 ~ ~~ APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CAII: Commissioner Hepper Voted~~` Commissioner Rountree Votedt~d~ Commissioner Shearer Voted~~- Commissioner Alidjani Voted~~~ Chairman Johnson (Tie Breaker) Voted DECISION AND RECOMMENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby AMBROSE, F"'^•ERALD 'STON .~w ,«~ r.o. so:427 Muldian, k1aAo 83642 T~NpAaw 88&i461 recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that the Council approve the Conditional Use Permit requested by the Applicant for the property described in the application under the conditions contained herein,,~spec~fically 11-9-5507 of the ,. Revised and Complied Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that any Conditional Use granted by conditioned on compliance with the conditions herein and that the Conditional Use be revoked for failnu/r~e to comply with the conditi.~ons. 1 V e ~ I I ! i A~ '~ ~c' ~ ~fc"'t ~ ~ ~ • ~ '' ~ ~F ~~'~" ~ 0 ~ ~u I ~ C o ~`~ M n.J (~Q 7 ~ p'~i . Y MOTION: APPROVED DISAPPROVED: C~~ i MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL '4RCH 19, 1991 ,GE #4 n ~~~ ~M AR 25 '~99f1 ~'~.,~~,~qs T, Glennfield #3 which is of course beyond the boundaries o~~~=""tCrings Subdivision. They have mentioned that they would like to pipe it but they don -•tiave the funds to do this. Unless some kind of a deal could be worked between Settlers and other parties that were involved in that subdivision, I don't know of any other method to get the pipe installed. The developer of #3 I've heard is not interested in participating in piping of the ditch, now I haven't talked to him specifically. He did have to give up 18 ft. of ground there for easement that basically is going to be a line of weeds. Myers: It looks to me like if we had that piped from where it goes into where #3 is on the north side of Sandalwood all the way back to Cherry Lane probably is where it should ba done. Maybe if we could get these folks all together maybe we could get that all tiled down as far as to where you folks are. Preston: That was very much in our interest. We didn't want to pay for the entire cost of that pipe. We would certainly welcome the City's participation all that you can to help us there. The thing we don't want to happen is to hold up our entire plat until someone else agrees to do something. We would very happy to work with the City or someone else to get that tiled. Tolsma: What's the plan for that drainage ditch on the west side of that property? reston: It will remain open and fenced out. Tolsma: Is there an easement or right of way on that? Preston: Yes the Bureau of Reclamation has a easement. Giesler: There is a number of comments that came from the City Engineer about the number of lots. Preston: These were addressed at the Planning & Zoning Meeting and we concur with Mr. Smith's comments. We are going to drop one lot in one area to make certain that we get our 70 ft. frontage around the culdesac. The Motion was made by Tolsma and Seconded by Myers to approve the preliminary plat subject to preparing an 18 foot easement and hopefully working out arrangements to the that prior to building. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #5: PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PUD GENERAL BY GEMTONE, INC. Kingsford: At this time I will open the Public Hearing, hearing no response I will close the Public Hearing. ' '~e Motion was made by Giesler and seconded by Myers to approve the Findings of Fact~~~ Zd Conclusions of Law for Gemtone, Inc. for a conditional use permit. D, Roll Call Vote: Yerrington - Yea; Myers - Yea; Giesler - Yea; Tolsma - Yea: Motion Carried: All Yea: "^.RIDIAN CITY COUNCIL tCH 19, 1991 (~ ,GE # 5 The Motion was made by Giesler and seconded by Myers to approve of the Conditional Use Permit for Gemtone, Inc.: Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #6: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR VACATION OF WALKWAY EASEMENT, SETTLERS VILLAGE BY STEIN & PAMELA WOOD: Kingsford: I will now open the Public Hearing, is there anyone that would like to offer testimony on this issue. Stein Wood, 1762 Jericho, was sworn by the attorney. Wood: I haven't prepared a statement, but I did send a letter. The one thing that is not mentioned in the letter is the different interpretations of the property. The various interpretations are that I'm supposed to build an access way paved for my neighbors use, that the property isn't mine and I can't build a fence across it. Everything else is basically stated in my letter. Giesler: He is aware that there will still need to be an easement through there? vein: Yes. dingsford: Anyone else to testify? Jerry Rohan, 1774 Jericho, was sworn by the attorney. Rohan: I have letters with me tonight from three other families. We need that easement for access to the rear of our property. The surrounding areas are zoned commercial and we won't have any access to get back there to take care of that. The letters that I'd like to give you deal with safety hazards, area behind our homes, we really have at times a severe weed problem. There is no other way to get back there to haul out the weeds which are large. Reading through the convenants of our subdivision they are somewhat jumbled. Spoke about fences, walkway easements, title company. (TAPE ON FILE) We feel that we have really been violated, because it states in the covenants that you can not do that. We as a group fell that if the vacation is allowed to happen that our rights as homeowners will be violated. Giesler: Doesn't your property lines go clear to the back, even into the weed area back there? Rohan: Yes. Giesler: How come the fences weren't put out - ~ - Shan: There is a utility easement 10-15 ft. I believe back there. Tesler: I know in most other subdivisions the fence is taken to the property line. Phis is a very unusual situation. The weeds out there, you say they will be cut down, the times I have been out there, the weeds were higher than the fence. This is a poor design and should never have happened and I think you should be moving your / fences back there and be taking advantage of that yard and keeping those weeds down. CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF FINDINGS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Study Objectives On-Site Development Study Area Land Use Development and Growth Assumptions PROJECTED TRAFFIC Traffic and Circulation Trip Generation Trip Distribution Traffic Assignments CAPACITY ANALYSIS -LEVEL OF SERVICE Capacity Analysis -Intersections Capacity Analysis -Project Entrances APPENDIX A: LOS Analysis Criteria APPENDIX B: LOS Eagle Road/Fairview Ave. Intersection APPENDIX C & D: LOS Project Entrances on Fairview Ave. APPENDIX E & F: LOS Project Entrances on Eagle Rd. APPENDIX G: ACHD Conditions of Approval PAGE NO. 1 1 3 4 7 9 12 14 15 17 CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY DIRECTORY OF TABLES AND FIGURES TABLES DESCRIPTION Page No. Table 1 Projected Residential Growth 4 Table 2 Existing Traffic Volumes 7 Table 3 Trip Generation Rates 9 Table 4 Site Generated Traffic 10 Table 5 Regional Traffic Growth 11 Table 6 Peak Hour Trip Distribution 13 Table 7 LOS Fairview/Eagle Rd. 16 Table 8 LOS Project Entrances 17 Table 8 LOS Fairview/Reagan w/ Signal 18 Table 9 LOS Eagle/Congressional w/ Signal 18 FIGURES DESCRIPTION Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Existing Turning Movements AM Peak Hour (Eagle Rd./Fairview) Figure 3 Existing Turning Movements PM Peak Hour (Eagle Rd./Fairview) Figure 4 Projected Average Daily Traffic Figure 5 Future Turning Movements PM Peak Hour 2005 (Fairview Project Entrances) Figure 6 Future Turning Movements PM Peak Hour 2005 (Eagle Road Project Entrances) Figure 7 Future Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 2005 (Fairview/Eagle) Figure 8 Future Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour w/ Buildout of Study Area (Fairview/Reagan) Figure 9 Future Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour w/ Buildout of Study Area (Eagle/Congressional) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS iii proposed Pine Street extension. Congressional Drive aligns with the existing entrance to the Treasure Valley Business Park. b. A signal will be needed at the preposed intersection of Reagan Drive and Fairview Avenue approximately 2100 ft. east of Eagle Road. c. Without these signals severe congestion would result on all legs of the intersection and would likely cause safety and flow problems on the arterial roads. 10. The approach roads at Congressional and Reagan Drives should be improved with three exit lanes and a deceleration lane on the arterial. 11. The proposed roadway extension and intersection improvements at Pine Street and Eagle Road were not evaluated in this study. A separate study is being prepared by WH Pacific Engineers under contract with the Ada County Highway District. Prepared by Dobfe Engineering, Inc. CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Study Objectives The purpose of this study is to asses the traffic impacts resulting from the development of the Crossroads Subdivision and to evaluate the capacity of the road system to accommodate the site-generated traffic. On-Site Development Crossroads Subdivision is a proposed 154.5 acre mixed use development comprised of 256 residential lots and 5 commercial lots located at the southeast comer of Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue. The residential lots will be developed in three phases with the first group of 45 lots on line in 1994. Phases 2 and 3 are 100 lots each and will develop in 1995 and 1996 respectively. By 1997 the residential portion of the development will be complete. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 2 Commercial development will occur on over a five to twelve year period beginning in 1994 as shown below: Phase 1 (5 years) Commercial (5 anchor stores) 280,000 SF Phase 11(7 years) Commercial 370,000 SF Office 150.000 SF Total Commercial Square Footage 800, 000 S F Illustrated in Figure 1 is a general vicinity map showing the location of the proposed subdivision and adjacent roads. Prepared by Doble Engineering, Inc. CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY FIGURE 1 MCMILLAN RD. 0 ~ USTICK RD. ~ N U ~ -J I ~ ~ ~ ~ `' _ N I ~ ~ J W ~ J U ~ ~ W W ~ 3 FAIRVIEW AVE ~ ;;;,~;. ~ ~.~~ j;~ jj,. % % %~ S I TE i ; ; I I PINE ST. EMER LD ST. ~ FRANKLIN RD. INTERSTATE 84 OVERLAND RD. Traffic Study Prepared By: ~: ~: DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. 777 Hearthstone Dr. Boise, ID 83702 345-3290 VICINITY MAP CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 3 Study Area Land Use The Crossroads Subdivision/Retail Center is located in the east end of the Meridian Planning Area at the intersection of Fairview Avenue and Eagle Road. This area is designated as a commercial/industrial mixed use area in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. The Crossroads Retail Center is positioned to service residential growth in the now undeveloped lands north and east of the City of Meridian. These lands, which are currently planned for residential uses, are developing with a typical density of 3.0 to 4.0 units per acre. In the immediate vicinity of Crossroads on the west side of Eagle Road lies the Treasure Valley Business Park, which is developing with commercial and industrial uses. North of Crossroads and adjacent to Fairview is an undeveloped parcel designated in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan for commercial use. It was assumed in this report that lands to the north and west of the Crossroads site would be developed by the year 2005. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 4 Development and Growth Assumptions The Meridian and Eagle areas are experiencing an active growth cycle with new development occuring at the urban fringe where primary utilities are available and the lands are relatively undeveloped. In the Crossroads study area those preconditions of growth are evident, and it is likely that this area will continue to be a focal point of development activity. Shown in Table 1 are projected growth trends for the Meridian and Eagle Planning Areas. Table 1 Proiected Residential Growth (Total Dwelling Units) 1995 Meridian Planning Area 7,465 Eagle Planning Area 3,109 2005 12,969 4,794 For the purpose of this traffic study, the following growth assumptions were used: Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 5 1) Traffic Zone 145, which includes the subject property, will see the buildout of the Crossroads Subdivision (265 lots) and 800,000 sq.ft. of commercial and office uses by the year 2005. 2) An additional 250,000 SF of Business/Industrial Park development will occur in the Treasure Valley Park prior to 2005. 3) An additional 150,000 SF of spin-off retail and office development together with a 150 lot residential subdivision will occur on the undeveloped site north of Fairview Avenue during the study period. 4) Ambient traffic on Eagle Road north of Fairview will increase at an 8.5% annual rate between 1995 and 2005. 5) Ambient traffic on Fairview Avenue west of Eagle Road will increase at a 6% annual rate from 1995 to 2005. 6) Pine Street will be extended along the south boundary of the Crossroads site and will be available to accommodate site traffic by 1996. Prepared by Doble Engineering, Inc. CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 7 PROJECTED TRAFFIC Traffic and Circulation The current average daily traffic volumes on the major roadways in the general vicinity of the subject property are listed in Table 2. Table 2 Existin4 Traffic Volumes Average Dailv Traffic: Eagle Road North of Fairview Avenue Eagle Road South of Fairview Avenue Fairview Avenue East of Eagle Road Fairview Avenue West of Eagle Road Vehicles oer Dav: 12,000 16,000 15,000 15,000 Fairview Avenue and Eagle Road are both Principal Arterials connecting the central business areas of Eagle and Meridian with Boise and the interstate highway. At the Eagle Road/Fairview Avenue intersection all approach roads have five lane sections, and the posted speed limit is 55 mph. This intersection has amulti-phase traffic-actuated signal. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 1 The adjacent section of Eagle Road is part of the State Highway System (SH 55) and is currently improved with three lanes north of the Fairview intersection and five lanes between Fairview and I-84. The ITD Trans ortation p Improvement Plan calls for the reconstruction of Eagle Road to a 5 lane section between Fairview and Eagle Island. Work is scheduled to becompleted by 1997. In October of 1993 Fairview/Eagle Road turning movement counts were made by Dobie Engineering, Inc. Additional counts were obtained from ITD and recent studies of the Chinden/Eagle Road intersection (1993). Figures 2 and 3 show the Existing AM and PM Peak Hour turning movements at the Eagle/Fairview intersection. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. • • FILE: 9345A Source: Dobie Engineering • • FILE: 9345P Source: Dobie Engineering • • CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 9 Trip Generation The following trip rates for the proposed uses are recommended in the ITE Trig Generation Manual , (5th Edition): Table 3 Trip Generation Rates Residential Regional Occurance Single Family Shopping Center er Unit (per 1000 SF) Weekday End Trips 9.55 33.9 AM Peak Hour 0.7 0.69 Enter (27%) (62%) Exit (73%) (38%) PM Peak Hour 1.0 3.15 Enter (63%) (50%) Exlt (37%) (50%) These rates indicate that the peak hour traffic for all uses is greatest in the evening hours for both the residential and commercial traffic. In this study the PM Peak Hour was evaluated to determine future capacities and levels of service. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 10 Based on the trip generation rates in Table 3, the future site-generated traffic at full buildout of Crossroads Subdivision (both residential and commercial) was estimated. The findings are presented in Table 4. Table 4 Site Generated Traffic (Rounded) Crossroads Subdivision: Number New Trios/Day PM PH Trios AM PH Trios Residential 2651ots 2,530 265 185 Commercial 800,000 SF 27.120 2520 550 Total Trips 29,650 2785 735 Shown in Table 5 is the projected traffic that will result from the buildout of the proposed development and surrounding communities in the immediate geographic area. An 8.5% annual growth in ambient traffic volumes for Eagle Road and a 6.0% growth for Fairview were assumed for the period from 1995 through 2005. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 11 Table 5 Regional Traffic Growth (Rounded) 1995 2005 Eagle Road North 14,000 26,000 South 18,500 34,000 Fairview Avenue East 16,800 27,000 West 17,500 28,000 Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 12 Trip Distribution The subject property is located at the east end of the Meridian Planning Area. The major employment centers are located to the east of the site via Fairview Avenue and to the south via I-84. This geographic setting would suggest that most of the PM traffic would arrive from the east on Fairview and from the south on Eagle Road to the project entrances. To confirm these assumptions, directional counts and turning movement volumes were measured at the Fairview/Eagle intersection and the ChindeNEagle intersection, and distribution assumptions from recent traffic studies for Cheri Meadows (Fairview) and Hobble Creek (Eagle) were reviewed. These data were used to develop the trip distribution factors, which follow. The most probable peak hour trip distribution for the project entrances at Eagle and Fairview are shown in Table 6. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. • CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 13 Table 6 Peak Hour Trip Distribution (% of PH Trips) Tries Out Trigs In Right Left Right Left Eagle Entrance Residential.• AM Peak Hour 28% 45% 17% 10% PM Peak Hour 15% 22% 40% 23% Commercial: AM Peak Hour 17% 25% 23% 35% PM Peak Hour 35% 15% 35% 15% Fairview Entrance: Residenfial.• AM Peak Hour 35% 58% 33% 20% PM Peak Hour 20% 33% 35% 58% Commercial: AM Peak Hour 28% 10% 40% 24% PM Peak Hour 20% 30% 20% 30% Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. • CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 14 Traffic Assignments Based on the trip generation and distribution assumptions previously presented, future trips resulting from development of the Crossroads Subdivision lots and retail center were estimated and assigned to the internal streets and project entrances. The projected average daily traffic volumes are illustrated in Figure 4. Projected PM turning movements for the calendar year 2005 at the project entrances are illustrated in Figures 5 and 6. These volumes include the future traffic from the full buildout of the Crossroads Retail Center plus the background traffic growth resulting from the development of the surrounding communities. In addition to these turning movements, new traffic will accrue from the development of the lands north and west of Crossroads. This traffic was similarly estimated and assigned to the corresponding intersections with the Crossroads project. The turning movement volumes at the four way intersections at Reagan Drive and Congressional Drive are shown in Figures 8 and 9 and were included in assessing the capacity of the intersection. Prepared by Doble Engineering, Inc. J ~ as a W N ~ W ~ Z N N Q m a I Q I O ' ~ I W Q w N ,] L ~c ~' I i I I ~~ .56~ I SSIONAI 2p~Q O~ o° ~ti AL DRIVE ~S ~O I I ' o o I I L _. FIGURE 4 CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION PROJECTED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VEHICLES PER DAY FAIRVIEW AVE. PINE STREET EXTENSION FUTURE U 1 0 0 ooi ~O I . ~ I I X400 ~ ~~ so ~ ' ~°' 3s _,oo ,w o w zoo sao SCALE: 1 ~ ~ 200' CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY W Z W Q W Q I._L_ CO ~ ~p N ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ 152 258 269 161 ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~'`~ N N ~ ~ 00 O ~ ~ ~ ~ 97 175 ' 188 84 ,I N ~ O 00 cD ~ o ~ FIGURE 5 P.M. PEAK HOUR YEAR 2005 TRAFFIC PLUS SITE TRAFFIC REAGAN DRIVE QuAY~E DRIVE Traffic Study Prepared By. DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. m H~n+srau OR easE io 83~az (208)345-3290 CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY N .lL ~r ~ N ~ O ~ ~ N N ~ ~ FIGURE 6 P.M. PEAK HOUR YEAR 2005 TRAFFIC -207 PLUS SITE TRAFFIC - 94 -~ 10 2 --~ 212 E. CONGRESSIONAL DRIVE 0 Q 0 W ~~~r~ lJ Q W ~ - ~N ~ ~ ~ N N ~ ~ ~ N ~ O ~ _ ~ ~ 1 1 E. PRESIDENTIAL DRIVE 105 50 56 X119 1 1 ~ ~, rn~ N O ~ ~ • CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 15 CAPACITY ANALYSIS -LEVEL OF SERVICE Capacity Analysis -Intersections A capacity analysis and Level of Service calculation was prepared to evaluate the future traffic conditions at the project entrances and major intersections in the surrounding area. This analysis was based on the procedures and methodologies developed in the Highway Capacity Manual (TRB Report 209). A discussion of Level of Service standards is included in Appendix A. Fairview Avenue/Eagle Road Intersection The year 2005 was selected for evaluating the the capacity of the signalized Fairview Avenue/Eagle Road intersection for several reasons: 1) this period would see the full development of the Crossroads Subdivision and commercial center proposed for the site; 2) year 2005 growth projections are available for both regional population and traffic forecasts at this location; and 3) planned improvements to the approach roads and interstate widening will be completed by that date. Prepared by Doble Engineering, Inc. • • FILE: 9345D Source: Dobie Engineering CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY - 16 The findings of this analysis are summarized in Table 7 below. Table 7 Fairview Avenue and Ea41e Road Intersection Year 2005 PM Peak Hour A~aroach Level of Service Volume/Caaacity Ratio Eastbound B .51 Westbound C .60 Northbound B .38 Southbound B .29 With the additional traffic from the proposed development and projected growth in the study area, the overall level of service will maintain a "B" rating and a volume to capacity ratio within acceptable standards through the year 2005. The detailed calculations supporting these findings are contained in Appendix B. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. • • CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 19 It is evident from this analysis that congestion will develop at the project entrances and affect the safety and quality of flow on the arterial roadways without signals. With a traffic signal and three lanes on each approach the main project entrance at Eagle/Congressional and Fairview/Reagan will operate within acceptable standards. The secondary entrances at Presidential Drive and Quayle Drive will also operate more effectively with the addition of the proposed signals. The intersection of Pine Street and Eagle Road will be evaluated in a separate study. Because this study has not been completed, there are no findings available to include in this report. Prepared by Doble Engineering, Inc. • APPENDIX A ` • ~PPE~IDIX - A Level of Service -Intersection Capacity Analysis The standard used to evaluate traffic operating conditions of the transportation systems is referred to as the level of service (LOS). This is a qualitative assessment of the quantitative effect of factors such as speed, volume of traffic, geometric features, traffic interruptions, delays and freedom to maneuver. Figure A provides an example of the desired output from alevel-of- service analysis. YVhereas capacity refers to the capability of a road to accommodate a quantity of traffic past a location in an interval, level of service speaks to the quality of traffic service being provided to the users of the roadways. Signalized Intersections: The measure of effectiveness far signalized intersection operation is level of service, which is based on roadway system characteristics including lane geometry, percentage of trucks, peak hour factor, number of lanes, signal progression, traffic volume, ratio of signal green time to cycle time (GJC}, roadway grades, paridng conditiions and pedestrian flows. Level of service categories have been established based on relative levels of driver acceptabiUty of vaMous delays. Unsignalized Intersections: Unsignalized intersection LOS is based on reserve capacity. The i~ HCAA's LOS procedure computes capacity for each movement based upon the critical time gap required to complete the maneuver and the volume of traffic that is opposing the movement. For unsignaiized intersections, overall intersection LOS is not defined. i~ Figure A • Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersection Level Average of Stopped Delay Qualitative Description Service per Vehicle (sec) A B C D E F <5.1 Good progression, few stops and cycle lengths. 5.1 - 15.0 Good pregression and/or short cycle lengths; more vehicle stops. 15.1 - 25.0 Fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths, some cycle failures; signficant portion of vehicles must stop. 25.1 - 40.0 Congestion becomes noticeable; high valume- to-capacity ratio, longer delays, noticeable cycle failures. 40.1 - 60.0 At or beyond limit of acceptable delay; poor progression, Fong cycles, high volumes, long queues. >60.0 Unacceptable to drivers. ,4rriv2ti volumes greater than discharge capacity; long cycle lengths, unstable-unpredictable flows. Fig~ar~ ~ Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Reserve Capacity Impact on Minor Service {pcph) Street Traffic A >400 Little or no delay B 300 - 399 Shvrt traffic delays C Z00 - 299 Average traffic delays Q 100 - 199 Long traffic delays E 0 - 99 Very long traffic delays F '' Source: Highway Capacity Manual pcph =passenger cars per hour *When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane, extreme delays will be encountered with queuing, which may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. This condition usually warrants improvement to the intersection. LJ APPENDIX B ------- -- ® /~~~"~` ITS,, ` ~' 7, ----------IU ~ `--- ~-------- - ---------------------- ------------------ - INPUT WORKSHEET ~ ~ Intersection:EAGLE RD. AT FAIRVIEW AVE. Date:10-16-93 " nalyst:DOBIE TimePeriod Anlyzd:2005 PM Area Type: CBD XOther ~oject No.9345A City/State:MERIDIAN ID. VOLUME AND GEOMETRICS ^ (N) ~~~ NORTH ~~ [ 496] SB TOTAL <~ ~ ~> 43 377 76 EAGLE RD. N/S ST. 1 1 1 12.0 12.0 ~ 12.0 RT TH LT < ~ > v 1-12.0'-LT---^ 1-12.0'--TH---> 122 ^ 550 <- [ 835] -WB TOTAL 163 v ^---RT-12.0'-1 <---TH--12.0'-1 v---LT-12.0'-1 IDENTIFY IN DIAGRAM 1.Volumes 2.Lanes,lane widths 3.Movements by lane 4.Parking locations 5.Bay storge ingths 6.Islands 7.Bus stops TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY 1-12. --------- 691J E/B TOTAL CONDITIONS 0'-RT---v -------- 76 - -> 443 - v 172 ^ < ~ > - LT TH RT 12.0 ~ 12.0 ~ 12.0 ~ 1 1 1 ---------------- FAIRVIEW E/W STREET 476 366 <^> 119 [ 961] N/B TOTAL ------------------------------- Ap Grd. % HV Adj.Pkg.Lane Buses PHF Cnf.Ped Pedstrn Button Arr. pr (o) Y/N Nm ------- ------- (Nb) ------- ------- (pd/hr) Y/N ------- ----- Mn.Time Type -- ------- ----- - ---- ------- iB +0.0 2.0 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 20 3 WB +0.0 2.0 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 20 3 NB +0.0 2.0 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 20 3 SB +0.0 2.0 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 20 3 ------------------- Grade:+up,-down ------------ Nb•buses ---- stopping/ hr Min.Timing: min.green for HV:veh. > 4 whls PHF:peak-hour factor pedestrian crossing Nm:pkg.maneuvers/hr Cnf.Peds:Cnflctng peds/hr Arr.Type: Type 1-5 PHASING ___________= OR =__ _= OR ______ _________ _______ _ OR =___= OR =_______________ * * * ^ ^ D * * * + + I **> <+**> <+* ***** <***** <***** A v v G v ^ v ^ ~. R ^ ^ A <** <**+> *+> ***** *****> *****> M * * * + + * * v v ----- -----*-- -------- -------- -------- - G= 10.0 G= 24.0 Tim- G= 10.0 G= 20.0 G= 20.0 G= 24.0 G= 10.0 G= 10.0 ing Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R- 3 Y+R- 3 Y+R= 3 ----- -------- -------- -----A - -----A - -----A - -----A - -----A - -----A - ~tmd/Act A A A ~I Intersection:EAGLE RD. AT FAIRVIEW AVE. Date:10-16-93 pnalyst:DOBIE TimePeriod pnlyzd:2005 PM Area Type: CBD XOther Project No.9345A C1.t State•MERIDIAN ID. Y/ ____________________________________________ r, __________________________________________ INPUT WORKSHEET IIntersection:EAGLE RD. AT FAIRVIEW AVE. Date:10-16-93 nalyst:DOBIE TimePeriod Anlyzd:2005 PM Area Type: CBD XOther ~oject No.9345A City/State:MERIDIAN ID. 1 VOLUME AND GEOMETRICS EAGLE RD. N/S ST. [ 496] I 122 " " I (N) ~~~ NORTH r t R A M SB TOTAL < v > 43 377 76 ----------------- 1 1 1 12.0 12.0 I 12.0 RT TH LT v 1-12.0'-LT---^ 1-12.0'--TH---> 550 <- [ 835] -WB TOTAL 163 v ^---RT-12.0'-1 <---TH--12.0'-1 v---LT-12.0'-1 IDENTIFY IN DIAGRAM 1-12. 0'-RT---v 1.Volumes --------- -------- < ~ > -- --------------- :?.Lanes,lane widths LT TH RT FAIRVIEW 3.Movements by lane 76 12.0 ~ 12.0 E/W STREET 4.Parking locations - ~ 12.0 ~ 476 °i.Bay storge ingths [ 691] -> 443 1 1 1 366 <^> 119 h.Islands E/B TOTAL - [ 961] 7.Bus stops v 172 N/B TOTAL TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS ----------------- i~p Grd. ~ HV ---------- Adj.Pkg.Lane Buses PHF Cnf.Ped Pedstrn Button Arr. }fir (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) (pd/hr) Y/N Mn.Time Type ~~B +0.0 2.0 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 20 3 i~TB +0.0 2.0 N 0 0 0.9 0 10 Y 2 0 3 ].JB +0.0 2.0 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 20 3 13B +0.0 2.0 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 20 3 ~srade:+up,-down Nb:buses stopping/ hr Min.Timing: min.green for l:iV:veh. > 4 whls PHF:peak-hour fact or pedestrian crossing 'vm:pkg.maneuvers/hr Cnf.Peds:Cnflctng peds/hr Arr.Type: Type 1-5 :PHASING -- ------ --------- -------- ----- O OR ---------------- -------------- •---------- OR =__ •------------ ------ _= OR -- ------- -- ------ ----- -- * * * " D * * * + + I **> <+**> <+* ***** <***** <***** A v v G v v <** * * " <**+> * * " *+> * * * ***** ~+c ~ *****>. v *****> v ----- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Tim- G= 10.0 G= 20.0 G= 20.0 G= 24.0 G= 10.0 G= 10.0 G= 10.0 G= 24.0 ing Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 ~tmd/Act A A A A A A A A A Intersection:EAGLE RD. AT FAIRVIEW AVE. Date:10-16-93 Analyst:DOBIE TimePeriod Anlyzd:2005 PM Area Type: CBD XOther Project No.9345A City/State:MERIDIAN ID. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ~IIntersection:EAGLE RD. AT FAIRVIEW AVE. Date:10-16-93 "nalyst:DOBIE TimePeriod Anlyzd:2005 PM Area Type: CBD XOther =oject No.9345A City/State:MERIDIAN ID. _______________________LEVEL-OF-SERVICE WORKSHEET =_____--___________________ First Term Delay Second Term Delay Tot.Delay_& LOS LANE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 GROUP v/c Green Cycle Delay Lane Delay Prgrsn Lane Gp Ln Apprch Apr ---- Ratio Ratio Length di Group d2 Factor Delay Gp Delay LOS 1 2 X g/C C sec/veh Cap,c sec/veh PF sec/veh LOS sec/veh Tbl My ------ ------ -(sec) ----- - (vph) ------- T_9_13 (6+8)*9 9=1 ------- 9=1 A 0.223 0.222 90.0 21.77 376 0.05 1.00 21.82 C EB N 0.511 0.411 90.0 15.02 1402 0.27 0.85 12.99 B 13.92 B ~_ ~B -- A ------ 0.418 ------ 0.256 ------ 90.0 ------- 21.22 ----- 433 ------- 0.40 ------ 1.00 ------- 21.62 --- C N 0.599 0.378 90.0 17.11 1308 0.56 0.85 15.02 C A 0.721 0.333 90.0 20.01 564 3.11 1.00 23.12 C N 0.385 0.522 90.0 9.77 1804 0.07 0.85 8.36 B NI 0.2861 0.4891 90.01 10.391 17151 0.031 0.85 I 18.851 B 16.26 C 13.82 B 9.67 B _.itersection Delay 13.84 sec/veh, Intersection LOS B Table 9.1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- "~~LANE GROUP-DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] -A -^-----N ------------------------------------------------------------ * v it i~ ii i~ 1 y ~~ l ,,. ~'^ATION:FAIRVIEW AT QUAYLE INAME:CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- OURLY VOLUMES VOLUMES IN PCPH N Major street:FAIRVIEW AVE ~N= 3 <---V5--- 1406 <---V5--- Grade 1028---V2---> v---V4--- 188 ---V2---> v---V4--- 207 0% 84---V3---v N= 3 ---V3---v < > ___--_____ _________________ _______-- Date of Counts: I I 2005 PM V7 V9 X STOP V7 V9 Time Period: ~ ~ YIELD ~pM 175 97 193 107 Approach Speed: Minor Street: Grade 45 QUAYLE 0% PHF: .9 N= 3 opulation: 100000 VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS ---- ---- --------------------------------- ------------------ Movement no. -------------- ~ 2 ~ 3 9 ~ 4 ~ 5 ~ 7 Volume (vph) ~ 1028 ~ 84 ~ 188 ~ 1406 ~ 175 ~ 97 Vol(pcph),see Table 10. 1IXXXXXXXX~XXXXXXXX~ 207 ~XXXXXXXX~ 193 ~ 107 =====________________ ___ ____ _____________________ M __________________ et St ___ ~-> V9 inor ~~EP 1 RT From re Conflicting Flows, Vc 1/2 V3+V2= 0 + 514 = 514 vph(Vc9) ,Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 6.5 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp9= 480 pcph (Fig.10.3) Actual Capacity, Cm Cm9=Cp9= 480 pcph _____________________ STEP 2---LT From Major Street ----------~ -----------v-- V4 ----------------------- Conflicting Flows, Vc ----------------- -- ------ V3+V2= 0 + 1028 = 1028 vph(Vc4) Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 6 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp4= 264 pcph (Fig.10.3) % of Cp utilized and Impedance Factor (V4/Cp4)x100= 78.4% P4= .27 Actual Capacity, Cm (F1g.10 5) Cm4=Cp4= 264 pcph------------------- ----------------------- STEP 3 LT From Minor ------- Street ~ <-~ V7 1/2 V3+V2+V5+V4= Conflicting Flows, Vc 0 + 1028 + 1406 + 188 = 1700 vph(Vc7) Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 8.5 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp7= 35 pcph (Fig.10.3) Actual Capacity, Cm Cm7=Cp7xP4= 35 x .27 = 9 pcph -- - -- SHARED LANE CAPACITY SH = (V7+V9)/((V7/Cm7)+(V9/Cm9)) if lane is shared CR CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH) (CM-V) (CSH-V) CM CSH ----7------ 193 9 -184 F 9 107 480 373 B ~, ~{ 20~ 2~4 S7 ~ .-, LOCATION:FAIRVIEW AVE @ REAGAN DR. NAME:CROSSROADS SUB. -'`URLY VOLUMES Grade Oo N = 3 140 V 12 ^ 50 N V11 60 ------------- --------- I V10 ------------------____ N= 4 < v I> ^----------V6-- 120 Grade 0% <----------VS-- 1336 N= 4 60 --V1------------^ v----------V4-- 269 964 --V2------------> major road Grade Oo 161 ==V3==_==__====_v <~ > FAIRVIEW AVE -- - V7 -- - ~------- 258 I STOP xx V8 N= 3 50 YIELD Date of Counts:2005 V9 Time Period:PM minor road 152 Prevailing Speed:45 REAGAN DR. PHF:.9 Grade 0 % Population:100000 VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS ovement no . ~ 1 ~ 2 ~ 3 ~ 4 ~ 5 ~ -- ----------------- 6 ~ 7 ~ 8 ~ 9 ~ 10 ~ 11 ~ ---- 12 --~--e----h--------- .um ---------- ------------------------ 60 964 161 269 1336 ------------------------ ------------------------------- 120 258 50 152 60 50 ------------------------------ ---- 140 Vol(pcph),Tab.10.1~ 66~XXXX~XXXX) 296~XXXX~ - XXXX~ 284 55I 167 66~ 55I ---- 154 IN PCPH 154 V12 55 V11 ______________________ I 66 V10 < v ~> 66 --V1------------^ __ --V2------------> __ --V3------------v ^----------V6-- __ <----------V5-- __ v----------V4-- 296 <~ > V7 284 V8 55 V9 167 r • LOCATION:FAIRVIEW AVE @ REAGAN DR. NAME:CROSSROADS SUB. ------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- "'^EP 1 RT From Minor Street ~ /-> V9 ~ <-/ V12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows, Vc Critical Gap, Tc (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3) % of Cp utilized Impedance Factor, P (Fig.10.5) Actual Capacity, Cm 1/2 V3+VZ=Vc9 0+ 482= 482 Vph 6.5 (secs.) Cp9 = 503 pcph (V9/Cp9)x100= 33.2% P9= .74 Cm9=Cp9= 503 pcph 1/2 V6+V5=Vc12 0+ 668= 668 Vph 6.5 (secs.) Cp12 = 383 pcph (V12/Cpl2)x100= 40.2% P12= .67 Cml2=Cp12= 383 pcph STEP 2 LT From Major Street ~ v-- V4 ~ --^ V1 Conflicting Flows, Vc V3+V2=Vc4 V6+V5=Vci 10+ 964= 964 h ( 0+ 1336= 1336 h Critical Gap, Tc (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3) % of Cp utilized Impedance Factor, P (Fig.10.5) Actual Capacity, Cm ~P 6 (secs.) Cp4 = 289 pcph (V4/Cp4)x100= 100% P4= 0 Cm4=Cp4= 289 pcph vp 6 (secs.) Cpl = 168 pcph (V1/Cp1)x100= 39.3% P1= .68 Cml=Cpl= 168 pcph STEP 3 TH From Minor Street ~ V8 ~ v V11 Conflicting Flows, Vc .5V3+V2+V1+V6+V5+V4=Vc8 .5V6+V5+V4+V3+V2+V1=Vc11 ~I _itical Gap, Tc (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3) of Cp utilized Impedance Factor, P (Fig.l0.5) Actual Capacity, Cm 0+ 964+ 60+ 120+ 1336+ 269= 1700 vph 8 (secs.) Cp8 = 40 pcph (v8/cp8)xloo= 100% P8= 0 Cm8=Cp8xPixP4 0= 40x.68x Opcph 0+ 1336+ 269+ 161+ 964+ 60= 1700 vph 8 (secs.) Cpii = 40 pcph (v11/cp11)x1oo= 100% P11= 0 Cm11=Cp11xPixP4 0= 40x.68x Opcph STEP 4 LT From Minor Street ~ <-\ V7 ~ \-> V10 licting Flows, Vc Critical Gap, Tc (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3) ctual Capacity, Cm I~ Vc8(step3)+V11+V12=Vc7 1700+ 50+ 140= 1700vph 8.5 (secs.) Cpl = 35 pcph Cm7=Cp7xP1xP4xP11xP12 = 35x.68x Ox 0x.67 = 0 pcph Vc11(step3)+V8+V9=Vc10 1700+ 50+ 152= 1700vph 8.5 (secs.) Cp10 = 35 pcph Cm10=Cp10xP4xP1xP8xP9 = 35x Ox.68x 0x.74 = 0 pcph i~ ~Y i~ ~LOCATION:FAIRVIEW AVE @ REAGAN DR. NAME:CROSSROADS SUB. SHARED LANE CAPACITY APPROACH MOVEMENTS 7,8,9 CR CR MOVEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH) (CM-V) (CSH-V) LOS LOS CM CSH 7 284 0 -284 8 55 0 -55 9 167 503 336 APPROACH MOVEMENTS 10,11,12 CR CR MOVEMENT r, ---------- V(PCPH) ----------- CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH) -------------------------- (CM-V) (CSH-V) ----------------- F B LOS LOS CM____CSH 10 66 0 -66 F 11 55 0 -55 F 12 154 383 229 C MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1,4 MOVEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CR(CM-V) LOS A° ~ o~E~s. 1 1 I I I 66 168 102 D 296 289 -7 F I • ~T'`CATION:EAGLE AT PRESIDENTIAL HOURLY VOLUMES N> Major street:EAGLE RD. N= 3 <---V5--- 1312 Grade 1914---V2---> v---V4--- 56 0% 119---V3---V N= 3 -~ ~ .o ~NAME:CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION --------------------------------------- VOLUMES IN PCPH ---V2---> v---V4--- 62 ---V3---v ------------ --------------~-- __________ ----------------- --------- Date of Counts. 2005 PM V7 V9 X STOP V7 V9 -Time Period: ~ ~ YIELD PM 50 105 55 116 Approach Speed: Minor Street: Grade 45 PRESIDENTIAL 0% PHF: .9 N= 3 Population: 100000 VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Movement no. ~ 2 ~ 3 ~ 4 ~ 5 ~ 7 ~ 9 Volume (vph) ~ 1914--~---119--~----56--~--1312--~----50--I---105 Vol(pcph),see Table 10.1IXXXXXXXX~XXXXXXXXI 62 ~XXXXXXXXI 55 ~ 116 ~',__EP 1 RT From Minor Street ----------~-----------/-> V9_____________________ ,Conflicting Flows, Vc 1/2 V3+V2= 0 + 957 = 957 vph(Vc9) Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 6.5 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp9= 247 pcph (Fig.10.3) Actual Capacity, Cm Cm9=Cp9= 247 pcph STEP 2 LT From Major Street _---------~-----------v-- V4_____________________ Conflicting Flows, Vc V3+V2= 0 + 1914 = 1700 vph(Vc4) ,;Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 6 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp4= 105 pcph (Fig.10.3) of Cp utilized and Impedance Factor (V4/Cp4)x100= 59% P4= .49 Actual Capacity, Cm (Fig.10.5) Cm4=Cp4= 105 pcph STEP 3 LT From Minor Street ~ <-\ V7 Conflicting Flows, Vc ~ 1 2 V3+V2+V5+V4- Critical Gap, Tc ,Potential Capacity, Cp Actual Capacity, Cm 0 + 1914 + 1312 + 56 = 1700 vph(Vc7) Tc= 8.5 secs (Tab.10.2) Cpl= 35 pcph (Fig.10.3) Cm7=Cp7xP4= 35 x .49 = 17 pcph SHARED LANE CAPACITY SH = (V7+V9)/((V7/Cm7)+(V9/Cm9)) if lane is shared CR CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH) (CM-V) (CSH-V) CM CSH 7 55 17 -38 F 9 116 247 131 D ~ 6Z ioS 43 E ~ .~ ~OCATION:EAGLE RD. @ CONGRESSIONAL-------- NAME:CROSSROADS SUB. -------------------------------- ----------------------------------- _ JRLY VOLUMES Grade 0% N = 3 207 V12 10 N> V11 94 ______________________ V10 ---------------------- N= 4 < v I> ^----------V6-- 212 ~rade 0% <----------V5-- 1807 N= 4 102 --V1------------^ v----------V4-- 75 1274 --V2------------> major road Grade Oo ---45 --V3------------v EAGLE RD. ---------------------- V7 ---------------------- 65 STOP xx V8 YIELD N= 3 20 Date of Counts:2005 V9 Time Period:PM minor road 85 Prevailing Speed:45 CONGRESSIONAL PHF:.9 Grade 0 % Population:100000 OLUME ADJUSTMENTS------------------------------------------------------------- Movement no . I l I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 I ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- b~lume (vph) 1102I1274I 45I 75I1807I 2121 65I 20I 85I 94I 10I 2071 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ~Jol(pcph),Tab_10_1I-112IXXXXIXXXXI--83IXXXXIXXXXI--72I--22I--94I-1031--11I-2281 VOLUMES IN PCPH 228 V12 112 -V1- __ --V2------------> ___=====V3=====__=====v 11 V11 103 V10 v I> < ^ V7 72 V8 22 V9 94 ^----------V6-- __ <----------V5-- __ v----------V4-- 83 INPUT WORKSHEET Intersection:FAIRVIEW AVE AT REAGAN Date:10-16-93 '~alyst:DOBIE TimePeriod Anlyzd:2005 PM Area Type: CBD XOther ~oject No.9345B City/State:MERIDIAN ID. VOLUME AND GEOMETRICS REAGAN N/S ST. [ 250] 120 ^ ^ SB TOTAL 1 1 1 - 12.0 ( 1336 <- [1725] < v > 12.0 ~ 12.0 -WB TOTAL (N) 140 50 60 RT TH LT 269 v ~~~ ----------------- ----------------- NORTH v <---TH--12.0'-2 v---LT-12.0'-1 it i~ ~,E G R A M 1-12. 0'-LT---^ IDENTIFY IN DIAGRAM 2-12. 0'--TH---> ^ 1.Volumes --------- -------- < ~ > ----------------- 2.Lanes,lane widths LT TH RT FAIRVIEW 3.Movements by lane ^ 60 12.0 ~ 12.0 E/W STREET 4.Parking locations - ~ 12.0 ~ 50 5.Bay storge ingths [1185] -> 964 1 1 1 258 <^> 152 6.Islands E/B TOTAL - [ 460] 7.Bus stops v 161 N/B TOTAL TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS Ap Grd. % HV Adj.Pkg.Lane - Buses PHF -------- Cnf.Ped --------------------- Pedstrn Button Arr. pr (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) (pd/hr) Y/N Mn.Time Type .:.B +0.0 2.0 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 20 3 WB +0.0 2.0 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 20 3 NB +0.0 2.0 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 18 3 SB +0.0 2.0 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 18 3 Grade:+up,-down Nb:buses stopping/hr Min.Timing: min.green for HV:veh. > 4 whls PHF:peak- hour factor pedestrian crossing Nm:pkg.maneuvers/hr Cnf.Peds:Cnflctng peds/hr Arr.Type: Type 1-5 PHASING - --------------------- ----------_= OR ----- ---------- ----- OR ------ ------ ----------------= ----- OR ---- ---- - OR =_______________ - * * * ^ ^ D * * * + + I **> <+**> <+* ***** <***** <***** A v v * * Tim- ing "tmd/~ v ^ A /~ y * * * * * * G= 10.0 G= 10.0 G= 10.0 G= 18.0 G= 15.0 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 ---A-- -----A - ct~ A A A v G= 15.0 Y+R= 3 A ^ * * * * * * > 'i v G= 15.0 Y+R= 3 A *****> v G= 35.0 Y+R= 3 A t I ~ ~ A~ENCIX E _________________________________________________ _____ ~IIntersection:FAIRVIEW AVE AT REAGAN Date:10-16-93 'nalyst:DOBIE TimePeriod Anlyzd:2005 PM Area Type: CBD XOther :oject No.9345B City/State:MERIDIAN ID. LEVEL-OF-SERVICE WORKSHEET First Term Delay Second Term Delay Tot.Delay & LOS LANE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 GROUP v/c Green Cycle Delay Lane Delay Prgrsn Lane Gp Ln Apprch Apr ----- Ratio Ratio Length dl Group d2 Factor Delay Gp Delay LOS 1 2 X g/C C sec/veh Cap,c sec/veh PF sec/veh LOS sec/veh Tbl " p My (sec) (vph) T.9-13 (6+8)*9 9-1 9-1 ------ ------- --- ------- --- A 0.119 0.333 90.0 15.83 564 0.00 1.00 15.83 C EB N 0.640 0.589 90.0 9.27 2052 0.49 0.85 8.30 B 8.66 B ^- 1" to la -- A ------ 0.482 ------ 0.367 ------ 90.0 N 0.869 0.556 90.0' A 0.763 0.222 90.0 N 0.218 0.344 90.0 A 0.155 0.256 90.0 ---- 19.73 ----- 433 - ------ 0.01 ------ 1.00 ------- 19.75 -- C N 0.227 0.311 90.0 17.46 983 0.02 0.85 14.86 B ------- 16.66 ----- 621 - ------ 0.48 13.06 1955 3.23 ------ 24.91 ----- 376 - ------ 6.11 15.89 1085 0.02 ------ 1.00 ------- 17.14 --- C 0.85 13.84 B ------ 1.00 ------- 31.02 --- D 0.85 13.52 B 14.34 B 23.12 C 15.99 C =itersection Delay 13.68 sec/veh, Intersection LOS___ I---I-------I--- ------------------------------------------------------------B- Table 9.1 --------------- LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] A N ----------------------------------------------- v ~ ~ ~'~ P ~ E1~1 C~ 1 X ~_ INPUT WORKSHEET Intersection:EAGLE RD. AT CONGRESSIONAL Date:10-16-93 'nalyst:DOBIE TimePeriod Anlyzd:2005 PM Area Type: CBD XOther :oject No.9345B City/State:MERIDIAN ID. ----------------------- -----------------------------i----~------- ----------------------------------------207-====___--- VOLUME AND GEOMETRICS EAGLE DR. N S ST I [1421] 1-12.0-LT---^ 1-12.0'--TH---> IDENTIFY IN DIAGRAM 1-12.0-RT---v 1 Volumes ----------------- ^ ~~~ NORTH SB TOTAL < v > --45 1274 102 2 1 12.0 12.0 TH LT > v 94 v ^---RT-12.0-1 <---TH--12.0'-1 v---LT-12.0'-1 ^ - ---------------- LT TH RT CONGRESSIONAL 12.0 ~ 12.0 E/W STREET 12.0 ~ 1807 1 2 1 75 <^> 212 [2094] N/B TOTAL 2.Lanes,lane widths 3.Movements by lane ^ 65 4.Parking locations - S.Bay storge ingths [ 170] -> 20 6.Islands E/B TOTAL - 7.Bus stops v 85 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS Ap Grd. % HV Adj.Pkg.Lane Buses PHF Cnf.Ped Pedstrn Button Arr. pr (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) (pd/hr) Y/N Mn.Time Type _~ +0.0 2.0 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 18 3 WB +0.0 2.0 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 18 3 NB +0 0 2.0 N 0 0 0 90 10 Y 20 3 +0 SB 0 ? O N O o 0 90 lo 20--- Y --3-- - - --- - ------- - Grade:+up,-down ------ - Nb:buses ------ ----- - -- stopping/hr --- ---- Min.Tim --- ------ ing: min green for HV:veh. > 4 whls PHF:peak-hour factor pedestrian crossing Nm:pkg.maneuvers/hr Cnf.Peds:Cnflctng peds/hr Arr.Type: Type 1-5 PHASING ________ ___= OR ----- OR ------ --------- -------- OR ----- OR ----------- ----- * * * ^ ^ D * * * + + I **> <+**> <+* ***** <***** <***** -_ A ~ v v G R A M Tim- ing !, ptmd/~ v ^ ^ ^ * * * * * * * G= 5.0 G= 5.0 G= 5.0 G= 45.0 G= 10.0 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 pct ~ A A A A A 10 <- [ 311] -WB TOTAL v G= 10.0 Y+R= 3 A ^ * *****> v G= 10.0 Y+R= 3 A *****> v G= 18.0 Y+R= 3 A ~ ~~EI~IDIX ~ ------------------------ IIntersection:EAGLE RD. -------------------- AT CONGRESSIONAL ---------------------------- Date:10-16-93 ------- '*ialyst:DOBIE TimePeriod Anlyzd:2005 PM Area Type: CBD XOther ~oject No.9345B City/State:MERIDIAN ID. ______________________ N=CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET =_________ _=====W =====_ LANE GROUP 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ----------- Adjusted Ad.Sat Flow Ratio Green Ln.Grp v/C Crit. 1 Z Flow Rate F1w.Rt Ratio Capac. Ratio ? Appr. Mvmt. v s v/s g/ C c,vph X Lane (vph) (vphg) 3/4 4x6 3/7 Group A 72 - 1693 0.043 - 0.222 376 0.191 *** EB N 122 3117 0.039 - 0.344 1074 0.114 - A 104 - 1693 0.061 - 0.256 433 0.240 - WB N 253 - 3038 0.083 - 0.311 945 0.268 *** ----- ------- ------ ------ - ----- ----- ----- A ----------- 83 ------ 1693 ----------- 0.049 - 0.111 188 0.441 - NB N _ 2356 5259 0.448 _ 0.589 3097 0.761 *** ----- ----- A ----------- 113 ------ 1693 ----------- 0.067 ------ _ ------- 0.144 ------ 245 ------ 0.462 - ----- *** SB N _ 1539 3545 0.434 0.556 1970 0.781 ---------------------- ..ycle Length= 90.Osec, ------------------- Lost Time/Cyc1e,L= ----------------------------------- 12.Osec, S(v/s)ci= 0.641, Xc=0.739 LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = ------------------------------------- - PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] ----------------------------------- A --- A N * v ~ ~P~~1DIX ~ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ~IIntersection:EAGLE RD. AT CONGRESSIONAL Date:10-16-93 'nalyst:DOBIE TimePeriod Anlyzd:2005 PM Area Type: CBD XOther :oject No.9345B City/State:MERIDIAN ID. _______________________LEVEL-OF-SERVICE WORKSHEET =__________________________ First Term Delay Second Term Delay Tot.Delay_& LOS LANE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 GROUP v/c Green Cycle Delay Lane Delay Prgrsn Lane Gp Ln Apprch Apr Ratio Ratio Length dl Group d2 Factor Delay Gp Delay LOS 1 2 X g/C C sec/veh Cap,c sec/veh PF sec/veh LOS sec/veh Tbl Ap My (sec) (vph) T.9-13 (6+8)*9 9-1 9-1 A 0.191 0.222 90.0 21.61 376 0.03 1.00 21.64 C EB N 0.114 0.344 90.0 15.30 1074 0.00 0.85 13.00 B 16.21 C ~~ ~NB ~SB A 0.240 0.256 90.0 N 0.268 0.311 90.0 A 0.441 0.111 90.0 N 0.761 0.589 90.0 A 0.462 0.144 90.0 26.82 245 1.01 1.00 27.84 N 0.781 0.556 90.0 11.94 1970 1.49 0.85 11.41 20.19 433 0.06 17.70 945 0.04 28.42 188 1.10 10.47 3097 0.81 1.00 20.25 0.85 15.08 1.00 29.51 0.85 9.59 C C 16.59 C i--- B B D B 10.27 D B 12.53 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- .~7tersection Delay 11.81 sec/veh, Intersection LOS B Table 9.1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- A N * v ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1 1 TO: ACRD Commission V V" FROM: Development Services • INTER-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE CROSROAD/ OSTECH 8-5-93 DATE: April 29, 1993 SUBJECT : PRELIMINARY PLAT -CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION (Developer -Capital Development Corp., 2304 N. Cole Rd., Boise, ID 83704) (Engineer -Hubble Engineering Inc. , 9550 Bethel Ct. , Boise, ID 83709) FACTS & FINDINGS: 1. Crossroads is a proposed 256-lot residential, 5-lot commercial subdivi- sion on 154.5 acres of property located at the southeast corner of Fairview Avenue and Eagle Road (State Highway 55) . There will be 14,810-feet of new public streets added to the system. Three entry streets will proceed past the large commercial lots (80-feet of right-of-way in these areas) and into the residential area (50-feet of right-of-way) in the southeast corner of the site. The right-of-way and roadway width may need to be at least 60-feet and 41-feet back-to- back of curb from the main roads to the first intersections in the resi- dential area. This will be determined from the results of a required traffic impact study. The District may require stub streets to the south and east if the exist- ing or proposed zoning designations of the adjacent parcels is residen- tial as determined by the lead agencies comprehensive plan for the affected areas . The traffic study will aid in determining whether or not the stub streets will be required. 2. Fairview Avenue currently has 100-feet of right-of-way and is improved with 70-feet of pavement. The 2000 Urban Street Functional Street Classification Map designates Fairview Avenue as a principal arterial roadway, which generally re- quires a minimum of 80-feet of right-of-way (the District is requiring 114-feet of right-of-way for this road), width sufficient for 5 traffic lanes (65-foot street section) and 5-foot sidewalks. The ultimate right- of-way should be acquired now to minimize acquisition and construction costs in the future. ada county highway district 318 East 37th ~ Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 JAMES E. BRUCE. President GLENN J. RHODES, Vice President CHARLES L. WINDER, Secretary [] 1 ~~. PRELI~49INARY PLAT -CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION April 29, 1993 ~%? Page 2 ~ _ \\v 0 In the interim, the developer~~/11 a required to construct 5-foot side- walk. 3. The ACHD Capital Improvement Plan shows Fairview as currently operat- ing at Level of Service (LOS) E and is projected to operate at LOS F in 2010. It is not approved for use of Road Impact Fee funds to increase its capacity; therefore, Road Impact Fee offsets may not be given for construction of the roadway improvements along Fairview by the develop- er, but may be given for right-of-way dedication in addition to what exists now. A person seeking offsets must submit an application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #188. 4. Eagle Road (State Highway 55) is under the jurisdiction of Idaho Trans- portation Department. Submittals shall be provided to that Department for requirements and comments. 5. An extension of Pine/Emerald would run along the south boundary of this property. The traffic study should address the potential of using Pine/Emerald as access from Eagle Road and eliminate one of the pro- posed connections to Eagle Road. 6. This application is scheduled for public hearing by the Meridian Plan- ning & Zoning Commission on May 11, 1993. SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: 1. Submit a Traffic Impact Study to the District. Coordinate with Traffic Services Department prior to beginning the study. Additional require- ments may be imposed pending the findings of the study and any de- sign engineering wook accomplished prior to the District's review and approval of the study is entirely at the risk of the applicant. 2. Dedicate 5?-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Fairview abut- ting parcel (7 additional feet) . The owner will be compensated for this additional right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this bene- fit zone. 3. Construct 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Fairview abutting parcel. 4. Direct lot or parcel access to Fairview is prohibited, in compliance with District policy. Lot access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. 5. Direct lot or parcel access to Eagle is prohibited, in compliance with District policy. Lot access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. i~ PRELIMINARY PLAT: CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION April 29, 1993 Page 3 STANDARD ftE UIREMENTS: . ~ `~ 1. Street and drainage improvements shall be designed and constructed dards and policies . Q~v e required in the public right-of-way in conformance with District stan- 2. Dedicated streets and drainage systems shall be designed and construct- ed in conformance with District standards and policies. 3. Specifications, land surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACRD shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 54-1215. 4. Provide written approval from the appropriate irrigation/drainage dis- trict authorizing storm runoff into their system. 5. Locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigation and drainage appur- tenances, etc.) outside of the proposed street improvements. Authoriza- tion for relocations shall be obtained from the appropriate entity. 6. Continue existing irrigation and drainage systems across parcel. 7. Submit three sets of street construction plans to the District for review and appropriate action. 8. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for review and appropriate action by ACRD. The proposed drainage system shall conform to the requirements of Boise City and shall retain all storm water on-site. Public street drainage facilities shall be located in the public right-of- way or in a drainage easement set aside specifically for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes, sheds, or other valuable amen- ities placed in said easement. Drainage easements and their use restric- tions shall be noted on the plat. 9. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for review and appropriate action by ACRD. 10. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5-feet from the side lot proper- ty lines when the driveways are not being shared with the adjacent property. 11. Developer shall provide the District with a copy of the recorded plat prior to the installation of street name signs. 12. Install a stop sign on every unsignalized approach of a project street to an intersection involving a collector or arterial as the cross-street. The stop sign shall be installed when the project street is first accessi- ble to the motoring public. PRELIMINARY PLAT -CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION April 29, 1993 Page 4 13. A right-of-way permit must be obtained from ACRD for all street and utility construction within the public right-of-way. Contact Construc- tion Services at 345-766? (with zoning file number) for details. 14. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made, in writing, to the Manager of Engineering Services within 15 calendar days of the original Commission action. The request shall include a statement explaining why such a requirement would result in substantial hardship or inequity. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Develop- ment Services section at 345-7662. STAFF SUBMITT ING DATE OF COMMISSION APPROVAL: Larry Sale o \~ ,~ 7 ~ ~~ r.) Tai ~2,; ,~,,. r. ~!'Yi ~'~, l'!y, S Wu C~ ~?/ _- ~~~r~ ~ J c!/ //~ ;' 'f'ly ~ ~~ (_ M 0 .a !C!- . - -~' G~ , . ;_ s-~ / ~ as 1 ~:~ ~d~ /a~a'~~% Introduction SUPPLEMENT N0.1 1 A comprehensive traffic study was prepared for the Crossroads Subdivision and Retail Center by Dobie Engineering, Inc. (October 18, 1993), in which traffic conditions associated with full. buildout of the site and surrounding properties were evaluated. The purpose of this supplement is to focus on the residential portion of the Crossroads Subdivision and identify the traffic and roadway improvements appurtenant to that land development application. Three traffic issues. are- addressed. in this supplement: 1. Distribution of residential traffic. 2. Road geometry at the subdivision entrances. 3. Internal circulation. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. r.~ SUPPLEMENT N0.1 2 Residential Traffic The 256 residential lots will develop in three phases between 1994 and 1.996.- Concurrently, three access points will be constructed on the adjacent arterial roadways: ° Presidential Drive ° Congressional. Drive ° Reagan Drive The Pine Street extension may not be built within the residential development phase. Therefore, no traffic was assigned to this collector, Probable traffic distribution on the Crossroads streets is shown in Figure A, and- the findings of a capacity analysis at the entrance points is shown in Table 1. Prepared by Doble Engineering, Inc. FIGURE A CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION N PROJECTED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC RESIDENTIAL LOTS ONLY JL 7C u ioo aoo o so aoo am SCALE: 1' . Z00' SUPPLEMENT N0.1 3 Table 7 LOS Analysis at Project Entrances (Unsignalized Conditions) Left Tum Left Turn Right Tum In From Out From Out From Location Main Road Side Street Side Street Fairview Avenue Year 1996 PM Peak Hour Reagan Drive B E A Eagle Road Year 1996 PM Peak Hour Congressional Drive D E B Presidential Drive C E A This capacity analysis indicates that a generally acceptable service level can be achieved at the project entrance without a traffic signal. Although long traffic delays will impact the evening outbound left-turning traffic, the volume is small and a protected turning lane will be available. Left-turning traffic from the arterial roads will experience average delays at Presidential and Reagan Drives. More extensive delays will occur at Congressional Drive, but the volume is only 17 vehicles per hour. A right turn lane (deceleration lane) should be constructed at each of the entrances. A short acceleration lane and taper should also be added for buses and more aggressive drivers. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. • i SUPPLEMENT N0.1 4 Internal Circulation The residential streets in the Crossroads subdivision will carry less than 1000 vpd and conform to residential street design standards. The entrance approaches will eventually Cary much higher volumes and need to be sized accordingly. The internal circulation was arranged to discourage through traffic, especially vehicles shortcutting the Fairview/Eagle intersection. One shortcut opportunity remains, i.e. the northerly most connection between Congressional and Reagan Drives. However, since the Eagle/Fairview intersection has a free-right-turn lane, very little time is saved by taking the shortcut. Moreover, as the commercial center develops, the traffic friction from the shopping vehicles will further. reduce the advantage of the connecting link. Prepared by Dobfe Engineering, Inc. '~ • • ^ATION:FAIRVIEW AVE AT REAGAN DR. ~NAME:CROSSROADS SUB. HOURLY VOLUMES N Major street:FAIRVIEW AVE v N= 3 <---V5--- 1050 Grade 800---V2---> v---V4--- 26 Oo 15---V3---v N= 3 ----------- Date of Counts 1996 Time Period: PM V7 25 Approach Speed: Minor 55 REAGAN PHF: .9 N= 2 Population: 100000 V9 14 Street: DR. X STOP YIELD Grade 0~ VOLUMES IN PCPH -------------------- ---V2---> v---V4--- 29 ---V3---v _________________ _________ V7 V9 28 15 VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Movement no. ~ 2 ~ 3 ~ 4 ~ 5 ~ 7 ~ 9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume (vph) ~ 800 ~ 15 ~ 26 ~ 1050 ~ 25 ~ 14 Vol(pcph),see Table 10.l~XXXXXXXX~XXXXXXXX~ 29 ~XXXXXXXX~ 28 ~ 15 ------------------ ------- - ------------ -- --------------- ----- - - --- .._EP 1 RT From Minor Street ________________________________________I==--=_____=/===V9=====________________ Conflicting Flows, Vc 1/2 V3+V2= 0 + 400 = 400 vph(Vc9) Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 6.5 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp9= 560 pcph (Fig.10.3) Actual Capacity, Cm Cm9=Cp9= 560 pcph STEP 2 LT From Major Street I v-- V4 ----------------------------------- Conflicting Flows, Vc V3+V2= 0 + 800 = 800 vph(Vc4) Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 6 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp4= 360 pcph (Fig.10.3) of Cp utilized and Impedance Factor (V4/Cp4)x100= 8.1% P4= .95 Actual Capacity, Cm (Fig.10.5) Cm4=Cp4= 360 pcph a _______________________________________________________________________________ STEP 3 LT From Minor Street ~ <-\ V7 Conflicting Flows, Vc 1/2 V3+V2+V5+V4= Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 8805+secs0(Tab610.2~00 vph(Vc7) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp7= 35 pcph (Fig.10.3) Actual Capacity, Cm Cm7=Cp7xP4= 35 x .95 = 33 pcph -------------------------- SHARED LANE CAPACITY SH = (V7+V9)/((V7/Cm7)+(V9/Cm9)) if lane is shared CR CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT _V(PCPH)-__-CM(PCPH)_ CSH(PCPH)___ (CM_V)--_(CSH-V) CM CSH 7 28 33 5 E 9 15 560 545 A ~{ 2 q 360 3 31 ~ 1 • ^CATIONiEAGLE RD AT CONGRESSIONAL ------------------------------------ HOURLY VOLUMES N> Major street:EAGLE RD. N= 3 <---V5--- 840 Grade 1175---VZ---> v---V4--- 17 Oo 34---V3---v N= 3 Date of Counts: 1996 V7 V9 X STOP Time Period: ~ ~ YIELD M 15 34 Approach Speed: Minor Street: Grade 55 CONGRES SIONAL D 0% ~PHF: .9 N= 2 ~tion: 100000 ~NAME:CROSSROADS SUB. VOLUMES IN PCPH ------------------------- ---V2---> v---V4--- 19 ---V3---v _________________ <I V7 17 V9 37 VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ovement no. ~ 2 ~ 3 ~ 4 ~ 5 ~ 7 ~ 9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume (vph) ~ 1175 ~ 34 ~ 17 ~ 840 ~ 15 ~ 34 Vol(pcph),see Table 10.1~XXXXXXXXIXXXXXXXX~ 19 ~XXXXXXXX~ 17 ~ 37 --------------------------------------~-----------`=--V9--------------------- ------ ------------------------------------------------------------------- ~.._EP 1 RT From Minor Street > Conflicting Flows, Vc ------ 1/2 V3+V2= 0 + ----------- 588 = 588 ------------ vph(Vc9) Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 6.5 secs (Tab.10.2) potential Capacity, Cp Cp9= 428 pcph (Fig.10.3) Actual Capacity, Cm Cm9=Cp9= 428 pcph STEP 2 LT From Major ------------ Street ---------------- ~ v-- ------- V4 Conflicting Flows, Vc ------------------------------ V3+V2= 0 + 1175 = 1175 vph(Vc4) Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 6 secs (Tab.10.2) !potential Capacity, Cp Cp4= 213 pcph (Fig.10.3) 0 of Cp utilized and Impedance Factor (V4/Cp4)x100= 8.9% P4= . 95 ctual Capacity, Cm (Fig.10.5) Cm4=Cp4= 213 pcph STEP 3 LT From Minor - ----------- Street ~ <-\ V7 ---------- ~onflicting Flows, Vc ------------------ -------------------------- 1 2 V3+V2+V5+V4= ------------ = 1 ? 0 0 0 vph(Vc7) Critical Gap, Tc Tc 8 5 secs (Tab?10,2 Potential Capacity, Cp Cp7= 35 pcph (Fig.10.3) ctual Capacity, Cm Cm7=Cp7xP4= 35 x .95 = 33 pcph HARED LANE CAPACITY SH = (V7+V9)/((V7/Cm7)+(V9/Cm9)) if lane is shared CR CR LOS LOS UVEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH) (CM-V) (CSH-V) CM CSH 7 17 33 16 E 9 37 428 391 B y. 19 2~3 194 D ~~ • • ''"`CATION:EAGLE RD. AT PRESIDENTIAL INAME:CROSSROADS SUB. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- HOURLY VOLUMES N> Major street:EAGLE RD. N= 3 <---V5--- 855 Grade 1150---V2---> v---V4--- 14 0% 29---V3---v N= 3 VOLUMES IN PCPH ---V2---> v---V4--- 15 ---V3---v Date of Counts:== __________ _________________ _________ 1996 V7 V9 X STOP V7 V9 Time Period: ~ ~ YIELD PM 12 25 13 28 Approach Speed: Minor Street: Grade 55 PRESIDENTIAL 0% PHF: .9 N= 2 Population: 100000 VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS -------------- -------------------------- Movement no. ~ 2 ~ 3 --------------------------------- ----------- ~ 4 ---------------------------- ~ 5 ~ 7 ~ 9 ------- Volume (vph) ~ 1150 ~ 29 ----------- ~ 14 ---------------------------- ~ 855 ~ 12 ~ 25 Vol(pcph),see Table 10.1~XXXXXXXXIXXXXXXXX~ 15 ---------------- -------- ~XXXXXXXX~ 13 ~ 28 -------- -- ----------- .._r;P 1 RT From Minor Street ~---------- -------------------- -~-> V9--------------------- -------- Conflicting Flows, Vc - --------------------- ----_-_____ = 1/2 V3+V2= 0 + 575 = 575 vph(Vc9) ' Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 6.5 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp9= 438 pcph (Fig.10.3) Actual Capacity, Cm Cm9=Cp9= 438 pcph STEP 2 LT From Major Street v-- V4 - Conflicting Flows, Vc ------- V3+V2= 0 ---------------------------- + 1150 = 1150 vph(Vc4) 'Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 6 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp4= 220 pcph (Fig.10.3) of Cp utilized and Impedance Factor (V4/Cp4)x100= 6.8% P4= .96 Actual Capacity, Cm -(Fig.10.5) -------- Cm4=C 4- ------p--- 220 c h P --- P ---- STEP 3 LT From Minor Street ~ ---------- -- - ----- ----- ---- ----------------------- <-\ V7 ------------- Conflicting Flows, Vc ----------------------------- 1 2 V3+V2+V5+V4= 0 + 1150 + 855 + 14 = 1700 vph(Vc7) Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 8.5 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp7= 35 pcph (Fig.10.3) Actual Capacity, Cm Cm7=Cp7xP4= 35 x .96 = 34 pcph 'SHARED LANE CAPACITY SH = (V7+V9)/((V7/Cm7)+(V9/Cm9)) if lane is shared CR CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH) (CM-V) (CSH-V) CM CSH 7 13 ------------ 34 21 ---------------------- E 9 28 438 410 A 1 s 220 2O a C lannin ssociation 413 W. Idaho, Suite 100 Boise, ID 83702-6064 (208) 345-5274 Fax (208) 345-5279 A n~ Serving Governments in Ada County Since 1977 ~~~~ MEMORANDUM ~ ~ T 2 ~ 1993 TO: Will Berg, City of Meridian FROM: Ross Dodge, Project Analyst ~~ DATE: October 22, 1993 RE: Crossroads Subdlvlsion No.1 As a representative of the Ridge-to-Rivers Pathway Plan, I would like to comment an how this proposed development relates to the goals and intent of the Pathway Plan, Eagle Road has a bike route designation on the vision map of the Pathway Plan. To ensure conformance with the plan, adequate right-of-way should be provided. The Ridge-to-Rivers Plan would support the inclusion of pathways through the common areas of this subdivision. This would provide improved mobility for non-motorists within this development. Comment regarding the Master Plan: The southern and eastem boundaries of this development show no provision for future egress or ingress. As a result, non-motorist will be forced to use Fairview or Eagle Road when desiring travel beyond these boundaries. This will do little to encourage non-motorized mobility. Conformance with the Ridge-to-Rivers Pathway Plan would require this development to include either stub streets or inter-neighborhood conneci~ons along these eastem and southern borders. This would ensure connections to future developments and would allow greater mobility for non-motorist, without the need to travel on the two surrounding arterials Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If you have any questions, please call. RD:LSWD REVIEW.MMO pc: File 540.09/City of Meridian Ada County Highway District, Ada County, Cities of Boise, Eagle, Garden City, Kuna, and Meridian Boise Auditorium District, Boise Independent School District, Meridian Joint School District, and Boise State University Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer Printed on Recycled Paper CENTRAL ' ~ •• DISTRICT o'll'HEALTH Retum to: DEPARTMENT ~~~~~ p~T~a ^ BOiSB REVIEW SHEET `~ A~ ^ Eagle OCT 1 ~ X993 ^ Garden City Rezone # ~A~°~ ~~ ~~~~~~~.~~ '®-Meridian Conditional Use # ^ Kuna Preliminary ma hort Plat __ ~~ss .~'~S w~~i/is~~•1 ^ ACz ^ 1. We have no objections to this proposal. ^ 2. We recommend denial of this proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewge disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. W n approve this proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: a 2 feet ^ 4 feet ~, 7. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: Central .sewage ^ Community sewage system ^ Community water well ^ Interim sewage ~ Central water ^ individual sewage ^ Individual water 8. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Division of Environmental G~uality: ~- Central sewage ^ Community sewage system^ Community water ^ Sewage dry lines ~ Central water 9. Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding probelm. ^ 10. This department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined "rf other considerations indicate approval. ^ 11. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan reiew for any: ^ Food establishment ^ ^ Beverage establishment ^ Swimming pools or spas ^ Child Care Center Grocery store ^ 13': DATE: ld~l~3 y.3 Reviewed by: ~ CDHD 10-91 rcb S~LERS' IRRIGATION DIST P.O. BOX 7571 • BOISE, IDAHO 83707 PHONE 344-2471 October 8, 1993 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re; Final Plat/Crossroads Subdivision ~1 To Whom It May Concern; ~~~~~~ O C T 1 2 1993 CITE' ~~ i~~Ril.~9~~1 Don Hubble and Brian Smith of Hubble Engineers attended our October Board meeting to discuss the drainage for the Crossroads subdivision. The current plans call for drainage to return to the Settlers canal which is NOT acceptable, The EPA requirements for the Clean Water Act prohibit Settlers from accepting any drainage from residential or commercial developments. We are not a Drainage District. The Engineers tried to make a convincing argument that the quality of the drainage water would be acceptable but the Board is not convinced that it would meet EPA standards. The quantity of water is also a concern. The Board is taking the matter under advisement and will make a final decision at the November 9, 1993 Board Meeting; however, at this time the drainage issue is NOT resolved. The Drainage issue is a very important one which we cannot emphasize enough! The City Council approved another development--Summerfield Subdivision--which would have allowed the drainage from it to enter our system without Settlers knowledge or approval, Fortunately, several concerned citizens notified the District of those plans which our Chairman, Don Smitchger addressed at the September 21, 1993 City Council meeting. We would like to bring to your attention the fact that the 'Request for Final Plat Approval' of Crossroads subdivision was the first transmittal pertaining to this subdivision we received from the City of Meridian. Had the engineers for this project not brought preliminary plans by the office, Settlers would not have known a thing about the subdivision, That is not the way we prefer to do things. Preliminary information is imperative for us to give proper review and attention to these subdivisions. Of the four transmittals we received in the mail today, all of them were Requests for Final Plat approval, Settlers received NO Preliminary information on any of them. These subdivisions are: Fieldstone Meadows ~3, Crossroads Subdivision ~1, Cougar Creek, and Saddle View Estates ~1. This is not the first time this has happened and we would appreciate if you would correct this oversight. Settlers Irrigation District has a vested interest and is legally entitled to any and all information which affects its canals and laterals. If you have any questions regarding these matters, please phone 343-2471, Sincerely, Troy L. pshaw, Manager Settlers Irrigation District TLU/vrk HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk JANICE GASS, Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief BILL GORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERT G IESLER MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning & Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZ7J Memorandum To: Mayor, Council Members, Planning and Zoning Commi ~,y'oners. From: Wayne S. Forrey, AICP -Planning Director ~"-~ ;.. - ~ , Date: 28 Oct. 1993 Regarding: Crossroads ~ubdivisi~n -Final Plat Planned Development -General This Final Plat genea-~lly complies with the original concept ofthe Preli><ninary Plat and it complies with the c#un'ent Mer~.ian Comprehensive Plan for Planned Development. A review of the files did not indicate any unresolved development issues that are not addressed in other envy requirements. This Final Plat does'~~rot comply ~the:minil~un~ t-equir~ne~nts of the` R-4 development standards within the l~ridian Zoning and Development Ordinance,;;`, Because this is a Planned Development enerz proposal, the subdivision ordtnat~e allows flexibility in site design criteria. The developer i~$required to identify the design standards that will be used in the project. I recommend that this plat be approved with the stipulation that the applicant meet with the Planning Director and City Attorney to review the Planned Development -General requirements as it pertains to the entire Crossroads project and interface with the overall development concept. Restrictive Covenants are also required for City review. HUB OF TREASU V ' RE ALLEY A Good Place to Live OFFICIALS WILLIAM G.BERG,JR.,CItyClerk CITY OF MERIDIAN COUNCILMEN A JANICE GASS, Treasurer ~oe~ a~ e ~ BRUCE D. STUART, water Works supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO T MAX YERRINGTON JOHN SHAWCROFT, waste water supt. MERIDIAN IDAHO 83642 ROBERT D. CORRIE KENNY BOWERS, Flre Chief , Chelrman Zoning & Planning BILL GORDON, Police Chief Phone (208) 888-4433 JIM JOHNSON GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer FAX (208) 887-4813 Centennlai Coordlnetor GRANT P. KINGSFORD PATSY FEDRIZZI Mayor MEMORANDUM October 28, 1993 TO: MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: Gary D. Smith, PE ~ ~yzti~ RE: CROSSROADS SUBDI©ISION'N0.1_ (Final Plat) I have reviewed this submitta~"'and°~` ~ the following comments for your information and .,~~ +~ons.deio 4~ conditions of the applicant during the hcrin~.prbce~~: ~ ~'°'~>:~. ~~ ~ ~~4. 1. This plat generally. conforms to the lot a §~treet arrangement shown on the approeed preliminary plat. L'~, ~~~ ,~ 2. Submit street name ~ppr~val~ le ' er~ fr " the ~t~a County Street Name Committee. ~~ ~ ~ ~~ 3. Add note 8 The bottom elevatidx~~" f ;o~sf• ~ i~tings shall be set a minimum o#~ 12 inches abovea ~~ ~~ h'~. eft knowny seasonal ground water elevation. ~~ ~ ~ 4.~ ~k 4. Submit verification ths;t ,~e:4~~~~;erea hown is equal to or greater than den percent of the gross land aroma of the Planned Development being platted. ~~~~~ g~ `~ 5. Subdivision Development. Ordinance 9 Fk7~, Section H, Item 1 (Storage Area) , Item 2~~:z{~+a~kinc,~ Space ~~~~~~°;~nd Item 3 (Maintenance Building or Approved Area ~ ~w°»reed`~~~~,.~b~. a+ct~dressed by the applicant . 6. Provide clarification of "existing" water main in the water service statement in the Certificate of Owners on sheet 2. 7. The owner needs to sign the plat with the acknowledgement. Revise the reference to Max A. Boesiger, Inc. in the acknowledgement? 8. Revise the County Engineer Certificate to County Surveyor? HUB OF TREASURE VALLE~ OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live WAYNE S.FORREY,AICP,CItyClerk JANICE GASS. Treasurer CITY OF MERIDIAI~T BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR.. Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO JOHN SHAWCROFf, Waste Water supt. KENNY BOWERS. Fire Chief MERIDIAN , IDAHO 83642. BILL GORDDN. Police Chief Phone (208) 888-4433 GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor ~~~~~~ 0 C T ~ ,~ OL~SMA ROBERTG~IE~ ER CITY ~~ ~+~~N ROBERT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning & Planting JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator ii PATSY FEDRIZZI TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comme t an recommendations will be considered by the Meridian ~ ` may we have your answer by : _ p_tr ,~~, / TRANSMITTAL DATE:=~~ r'S,,„~~~j~{~RING DATE:.~~~~'~~q.~ REQ EsY UEST: ~ is `dY~-111c:)~ I ® ~ ~ ~` ~ --- -- - - r LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR V4 ,: ._ 1 JIM JOHNSON P/Z MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z r JIM SHEARER, P/I CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C B06 CORRIE, C/C 808 GIESLER, C1C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER ..,~ )JECT -. Y - f in ~ ~ ~p x.1.1 Lam. t"1,~ z ~ ,_. ~ ,~ ,~ `M1~311I`AN SCH40L DISTRICT ~ x ~~MERID~AN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) ~.. ADA_GUUNTY HI6HWA~ DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION r CENTRAL DISTRICT N~ftI.TH NANPA MERIDIAN IRTt<.w.BISTRICT SETTLERS IRR'IGATIQB`DISTRICT IDf~HO POWER.CO~.-(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) w ~ Ucs:°~tJE5T (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIN AND FINAL PLATS) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIN AND FINAL PLATS) CITY FILES OTHER: 2 a ~~ ,OR EXCEL! t ~y '11 ~ ~ ~c~~v~ O C T 1 3 1993 C]~~ ~I° ~~~~~~~~ t SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Bob L. Haley DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT Dan Mabe, Finance ~ Administration DIRECTORS Sheryl Belknap, Elementary Jim Carberry, Secondary Christine Donnell, Personnel Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911MERIDIANSTREET MERIDIAN,IDAH083642 PHONE(208)888-6701 October 7, 1993 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Crossroads Subdivision Dear Councilmen: I have reviewed the application for Crossroads Subdivision. This planned development will accelerate the need for Joint School District No. 2 to construct additional classrooms and/or to adjust school attendance boundaries. Meridian Schools do not have excess capacity. Nearly every school in the district is beyond capacity. The Meridian School District supports economic growth for Idaho and specifically the district's area, but such growth produces a need for additional school construction. We ask your support for a development fee statute on new home construction or a real estate transfer fee to help offset the costs of building additional school facilities. If this support is lacking then we ask that additional residential development be denied. Residents of the new subdivision cannot be assured of attending the neighborhood school as it may be necessary to bus students to available classrooms across the district. We ask that you assure the developer will provide walkways, bike paths and safe pedestrian access. Sincerely, ~~~ Dan Mabe, Deputy Superintendent DM:gr ~ r I m m ni ,cr ' .r a] ~ u^ .n u=a ~ m~ ai ~,do rte' ~' ~ a1OU~~)t~i G N tn `r' • N ~ Lsa +r -,w n mmu'] ml '*mi a'•~ Gm c -a+i'° ° . ~~ ' . ., ' i N [a ~ U"a ~ : 7 1. n • ~ m : A ~ 4~i If] In .u m C - S' Ln m n m d [JJ ']~ -L• O• ~ C~ ~ ~ Ka N •~ L .. m T m S ~ u ~ .. m s u;J is n~ T Ira m _ ~~-) iia m c] ~ .^. .~ ~ w 1 .... r- .a [_, .,_, ' G lu] ~ Y'] O• J} r-- n m ~ Qs ~ N K n m i>•i 4-a m • (-~ f1 ~ [L ~ Q L U i " RI ' m e ~ o .-. N ri u ~~~ 4~ m .r n m z .w '-' r" m O^ Ira 4'] m ~ O L+'a GGG _ a ° ~ rn x .~.. ^ m -if L]'i = 4'a m n . ' N _ .~ r-~ "' _] n m rn a. m r [ iJ ?a m a o n m m Ii r ' ~ n a s [L =x Ina ~ F i J m ,a• -'J . m N , _ ~ ~m _. m +~, er +r - ."' m s m = - n J- m r1] 3 47 47 m d .: r, m ~ Ir rh. o- u-a ^ a• -a a ti -' nmm nmrn N ~• ¢Nm ~ in n G rn- @ ~ - n .I n. ~'.. la ) ^ u v ¢ ~ .x ¢ rs ~ I]c m u W o i o I].J'~ JC ~ t- W S [J'i t- W ~ []7 t~ W )= U) h W JL J.n 1-- Li T'u-Jmnr.m ~mGnnou '-. ua lnm 'NtiU'-r-L"~ 1 [+~ m.`sa inNNw ii en I la_m Ne~s~ii m W brn ii ~° i I ^ 1 1 n 1 n u.mm~ !t. ~ i -0 [~li] 'nJ n m t y v n m ' .' ... - I II _' i Ja 1 a ~ 1 r_] ~ I ii i ~i m . ~/ r. nNm ~nmo-u-a -r In o a - '.o n m : u G m I I I J' ii ii . N .r n o ~ Lf]~. it d n -4' .T d- Il'] b 47 n .S m M 1 IL-a u ~ n ii m I ,I p _ I G ^ [ i ~ ~ ~ I -y j~}~~jyJ. m oa a~• 4 ^l CCi ~N-r S m N a m ^ :+ ' W 4 Z ] ~ ~ I . ~J 11 yl d N i Q 11 4_ •'r Lri m [^+ n ['ra h m n m Y •~ In 4`f m C ~ it ' c. i 11 111 _] $ 4 It 11 tl ti it op tL N [T n L"~ •..~ I /a cta .O l[•l N W -0 rl I I .-. 1 [ 4 a ~ 1 !a_ m r41 t]a m W ['a ~ ~ I ~1 ^ W 1~~aaa~ [n II LI [ a n MI ~ ' 1 ~ 9 .1f• ti 1 11 s it p~u ' J N~ N m G IT Cw G d m N N N U') ~+ b .4• J O` ^ m • Ii In ~ T 11 A II 11 I a IL M N .d ^ [T+ n N m In L]~ 1ILn~a ~ [`•~ ~ b' ih d -0 In d 47 II•i II'a 11'a b m tL nJ N Ln 11 m ~ [ m N LSD Ca] I ~] m L^~ 1 ~ d- m'~ n ~I ~ 1 .O 4? 11 1~ [`+ ~~ p. ~ n m ~ +Y b'. 1 m ~ ' ^ J ... 11 6T 11 N l]1 U- I ^ ., T. 1 d +:C ~[ I ~ N ~ U .It b n IaR st af+i i+t >K S2 xM Y _ 4 YS At LL M a3 Y 6 u¢ aeQ I 11 At W 6 Q III u LL i . I ~ + pp . + O !- G~= O^ •j ~ O~ O ~G^.. G~ O O O ' I r 11 G 11 9 S a 11 A4 G II Ji ~ o~ i 9Q YcI bC 1/ IDS G T3'i 4 11 - n II ' I Q a '~', G .- O .a O d 0 0 0 .t`. G •~ G G O I I 11 . n O h + I II ~ u a ens G u O F-• II n M ' I ~ ~~ . q ~ G d ... ~I O ~ O~~ O 11 Y t t cC U+ T e I I , m N S ,-. [ n N 1Sa lr] W Ili n f- b k S -[]' Y] .? 4'] In to 47 .[? C]'i N N LA 4`a '1 r ly I GL] 1 m N e~•• m ~O C~ 11 Q• TAI `G Jra > 11 F- - .... , y- ~ ~, II m +.+ .n II 11 I t~ ~~+, d O ~ d -0 ,% 0 0 ^ Yea r ~.~. G m d Ik I i 11 m 11 11 ~ ~ 1 It In Il ~ 11 - ~ ~ ^ 11 .m-+ 1 i i ~~ 11 11 11 " • 11 II I ~ 11 1~ 11 i Ln w 4 a n U m N -0 ..D• « .y Cry In P') In -0 n c- m c. rn~ o- b •~r ua a• rn G ~ ~ ii m ~ ` ~ u 11 II ii I _. ~ ^ ^ i ii m u ~ •~ ~' "7'~ ^ ~' N C+ rra [1D lT m G N -r n N m . -. i . I i II 1 ~~ [[ u I~ n 11 y W +m-.' h m G P -0 .-% IT O rn G •ri -0 C.'] C•• G ti G ~ ~ L li ~ ] 11 . .. ~ m CL C• m .r m .-. m n •-+ ..r C• N -0 [}. N ~ I ~ `~' 11 '. II It i • i l U0.] ' It I II h 11 rM ~ ~. -0 m m m •t'] rn m rn m ^ .S m m R^ LT II G 11 -0 m ^ •~ `Q ; ~1 ILl~ ' N d N ^ IL •O •.J) N 11 rp : ^ Q 11 .N-r m 0. U a . -r m ~i,' Y7 11 m •A _ Ira U'a ~ 11 al] ~ ~ N ~ u• In [~ G .-. .r qr n Ln -+ G N -..-. m ii - U a ! c ' ~ 11 1!•a U v 1e ° ^ ti b m O G n T m LT m N-0 to .p p• G ^ `+ ~ m n m - t rra i~ 44'1 T .~ Ln ~ 11 Y9 _. r. in: m ii -v u ~ + .. o : ii II m . m Ira 4'a u s n ~ ^ 'r-] =oi •o- a Ira n I i u i n n n p~ 0. •N C~~ ~ m [ L I ~ O m T . .. ...J.1 i ii ~ ~ i ^ 4 } .+ n N • ^ ~ -t~ P^ m~ -.O ~a Ln aS ii ` b n m n ' G Q ~ ~ s ~ ' m rpt+ii m ii -Li 6 ^ m m u~ I . tG T i. oG rp =a Win....-0N-0<••~. .~m~.-,n' dm ~ ~ I ii -a ry Kla IL _ o ~ M i ~ I n C•' ii •~.. ~ '•'a n ~ I ociJ w ye ...,b n n-0r,n a Inn n m 4-ami~a •~rl p. o ~ -0 b t d •cn ~°*i Ir 'i n '~ `t i m = a n V ^ 1 ~ ii v /l m ~ cfia a If-i~ 1 m _ i r~i, 4 • n m !ra II m n u Z I.^_t ae4 h4 aR iG `4 At JrS aai 9R aR qq44 art RQ 1-" .^• •~ O tai` G G . O n i gy . S a4 ieC ~ ~. G O r. G .... C G O I ' i G G ~~ 1 ~ a ~I 4 ii w~ u ~~ [U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 11 n I W O . :at w C't [C : ~ I,' ~ S ~ m m m Il r~ r„a m~ Ln 11 p sC' art M a2 ~' Yt aK at x3 ai a13 v ~ LC 9+S 9II r [;!a S d G J 11 ~ H m ~ ~ iA r=L ~ m 11 A G G .~ .:. G G O G •D G G O " O x M a +S pp iet h *7 O y:, ' n G S ? ~i~ a+t li G H O W 0 ra G G G d •~ .~ G O d `V G C O I v 4 ... ~ 1 m b N ~-1 J II n ?- [D ~ I ~ , ~ I II I uC 3t G '. i W K ~1 G ~ W u: ~ ~' G II G G t u d .-.. m In ~ . V G 7• N 11 I ~i ,11' } ~ T m i 11 p p n I >•' .? + -. .. i . .y u ^. ~ ! "i I 4 ~ i~ i ii n ~ Ln .a'jmca• -am[~•a ~-o ~ rs-m-am ~ ~ ~ I I 1 ! v p O'+ n m [N m m O~ O m G Iff ? 1(•i m OO ~ ^ ~' ~ i N I i I ~ ~ ~ ~ ( O .U• •-O il• 11] b 11 [~] I ~ ,, f ~ „ yy n . m 6 PJ P P^ m N •O• a G•a -0 n rn rn m :~ @• L'a+ mom -0 1 Ln t]^ j N 1 I I ~ M I y .. 1 E O [ I I 1 n1 ~ 3' I.+ 'a. 11 h p ~ r i I I 11 ~ i U 1 I ~ ~ I 0. I II ~ 11 ; M •"' N G Ir] N -.a h .1? m N +-. [i] i •-+ -0 _^ W lam] L . m~ rT -0 < . Yr G m G -0 •O m n 11 n [J) 11' ~ ' m' M ~ ~ I ~ T d ~ ~ ~+ . y ~ I Il M •L ~ . y 4 1 ~ I •r i.l r f JY p•~ 11 O + I U m Qh N y» ~ ' I '~ ~ w N .u m -o N - -a tiJ o- LT ~ ,-, Jr] ri7 0• C] ' m m:" ' " raA ~~ ~ cn ~ a .>r I ~'~~' n i I n ^ 1J m o ,, + J rr wmn_ s•m m[a• I 1'L] ii m I 1 mb,y ~. ~ +'] +-+m l '~ w• ~° ~ ~ I ! ~ ~ u~ 1 11 i m a e l m n I ~i u a I ^ la_a '~, ii r n n 41.. ~ . ^mmLnmGNnvamcrn-- rn... I ^-+-0[rJ rn nm + ,1LJ ~ n-a•mi-. ''u 's ! ii = Q ~ . U.r ~ m a m _ In In .,Jr m.~-_. ~ ii Ira i- - , m m m«r.u -. h .~. -aa . •.: m,n• m n h i ~ h I 1S' , . ' ii [^] h ~ -y 4'a ' u '~~' 4 j I In ', Ca ~ If .Lf.t. I~~- 11 ~ P . W J . .-0 ~..p G [+) rtl Ira -n• m R• Ctl M [~ m [.'a ! ~ ~ n m m n -i7 « -0 m m O` to -S [Y] b m 11 ... I ~ -aY O• r-. 11 Rf• ~ ~ I , G~ ml .FJ li ^ p LJ • ~ n i ~ 7. II ® i /r i Un-J "'[[nF`l+.~ 4tJ li Ltn3 fl p O rW-a •C at :e4 in art ~• v 'st fi4 t - c 9t aMt ]rE r~-~. I- Lf m m ~ U] m ~] ? Cl•• n L`•: P [Uy+~ m rn L7 v m N n M-0 7 I 11 ~' J9 Yt •~ ?t' N Yt h m O* l II +~•+ LJ] a.t"irti Jnt 11 92 ~ 1 11 M O 4 u + i 4 C. -U• m r1a .~. [L n N G W .J-. s m L+ ~ .x. ^.a r. .-. m ~ m rv Ln m tr .d- v- I I ~ ~ , w. Ln it to ~wm4-a 47 1n' u'J ' M t- -0 .E• 11 N awua cu-a• u m n 4'i n In n .. I i O `" „ ~ = w G ['} ~' a ii G tl m I ~ II . .•r JYa 11 t .-+ +-.: 11 q ^ 11 d ~ jj r ' ~ ~ m -.c r nJ m a -0 ,~ rv'r -. rn m m r~ La Y]a m O+ n N ~ Lh ' ii i I ii u '~. m _ 4; In . 47 +.+ rt,J .S ' i la. 1 1 +-+ t ~ ~ ~ ~ n 4- , m m '~ m m -o I a p l l t -] va I L7 ~ ~ f w i i eu ii m 'I L i 'a„ ~ ii cii li ~o J h ~ li I Q 1 tl 1 ! O ~ 1 I! r li 1 i _ G] ~m n ~' C^ RJ ; -0 L~~' ^ ~ V ~ ~ "].] tt• U9 ^ : h G y • • 11 U7 In ~' Ln it .~ 1 m " In a -r r- -r 'r In n -o in 4'. .? r' r;),J 4'a I _ f~] ~ N N II m ~ Cra m 11 m •~-• ~ N II U'J ~ ' m I O Q V ' _p t) iy [ c [tea ri. ~ q 'i c.a 11 11 11 ~ 11 ~ 1"- 11 G II G .a. li W i 'I 1)r 11 O 11 U ] - Ya .fi rn m .tl .r , w } [+`. 11 r 0. n ~ ~ 1 y.. It; 1 1 " i [ ] ~U ti 1 1 N: II m LL 7 ~.m ~ it [. 1 1 i N 11 a N II ~ 1 11 t ' 1 I t 11 47 [1' rt +t] m rta O ~ `iJ r+] .~ ,y. ~ m '~; 7 , ~ n O i rJ] 1n +" 4'J 11 m 11 G II !1 S t". .tJ' ~• .r I , Q .= 4 n r.L .P In 11 G r' 0. L rea M, it [D "y't _ !L m 11 +aI J ++ 11 r-a - ' 11 O+ 11 N I Q [,-] ra] Q ^ .-+ +: 11 C+i z u] - r ~ ~ b ~ U' ~ ~I •~ I U '~ ..... RJ .-. nJ t1J N .-• •-• it i . 11 . C u I .- . n ' p 'y I~ r- Ln d m u [u O ~.. + [- ', o~ c, a -n• N n r ~ ._ g u m ~ [ _. -0 11 II W U ~ '~ 11 ~ 1 it ^ .:_ . 11J n .a m '' m D G 1 rn M na + M J m m a C ~ - I 1 J• l :x: .~ .: ~ It ? ' h _ 1 11 n u UJ -~ Ira E- J t•. d .+ .S '] It) C- ..r '] N d ~Y' i Iwa ] ' O 47. 11 rW O N 11 i+) ~ ~ W m i P li m a- .r li n r- . .... .~ w e .-. ~ x c•a .+ . t s.l a. ", -. n m n i ~ w ~~ u' c Iv r• n.i -v ' .u [NiJ J [ia ~ In r' n ~ lip'-] 7 n : i _ it .-. m 4~ .- ~ ri. '~ i. m •'~ :r. u m u`i.. a ii _ J mJ » a- ii ui i ii . ~ ~ ,<a y- -[a u] . U. In I ua u Ln nJ ~u va Ln it a is " `'" o ~, a; a m „ ~~° tt • ~' ^ '~ - -y` 11 m ^ 11 m W .... II m X O ~+ ~ ti. II ~ z • .~`.v 4tJ ~tL 11 ~ W ~ " . 1 ... n ItJ -, I II ..J W Q: I.J .J L SC - ~ II J ~J W 1~ ~ 11 II ~ _ • G.a G ~ ...+ IY I'.J ra_ -~ _-.. i-i f. r. ] S i I' : ' II !>.+ ~: T 4 LiJ ~ ~ Il ' 11 , ? . W ti 2 J - i' ~ ;C j ._= 4J ~ r .. II ~ Wit- 1 J [J a ~'~ Il fir] S Ir ~ ~:~ Z II j~ i> J ^ 1 U W T J J .. ° ~ } ... r~i 2 L] ^~ tlt~ S ~ r] ~ L'] ~ W 7' ~ n T u W `J q l tC $ 1 l [:] U ru ~I 'S 4 L1 tJ GJ T J ~. li .J ' t 41 ~ ~ ~ .] L]J ~~ W 11 J V Z ~ « ,I h ^ N 4 -. ' " '] ff W [ J r_] W.laa -] . rra i:l'] , I L): _ J :G :rl .'1 II J V tom.. . ..._ ~ I .- W ~: :i U [t] J J ~ U 1- i 3: i .~ x 11 t• J li ca ~ ", _ _ _ .. _ _. __ _ _ __ ~ -_ .DATE: /YOV• ~f~~~.7 ;~i-ERIDIAJV CITY ~1NCIL AGEJVDA I TEM NUMBER 2 APPLICANT : ` ~ id i i ~ ~"1 v C.'A ,D,;I~d 1 ~) P1)P ADM A f-~ ~r-c, AGENCY MERIDIAN POLICE - `/`Q(/Yeu/p.~Q ~~ COMMENTS: MERIDIAN FIRE DEPT. - $'e..e Gorh.n.-~h~'S MERIDTAN CITY ENGINEER - SA¢ MERIDIAN ATTORNEY - MERIDIAN POST OFFICE - MERIDIAN SCHOOL D I STR I CT - .~"2 2 Cf!'~.~~~~5 MERIDIAN BUILDING DEPT. - Ot. ~lGthn~Kq ~}S't'oCiation, - S2~ Co~i~ew~.f' ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT - ADA STREET NAME COMMITTEE - CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH - S~2 Cohti~-$~^+~ NAMPA MERIDIAI~9 IRRIGATION - SETTLERS IRRIGATION - SC'? COf'r'+~M.2/~tt IDAHO POWER - US WEST - INTERMOUNTAIN GAS - BUREAU OF RECLAMATIDN - MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY - MERIDIAN PLANNING DIRECTOR - ~QQ ~'p I OTHER COMMENTS: I OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk JANICE GASS, Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Worka Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief BILL GORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH. P.E., City Engineer . HUB OFTREASURE VALLE~ ~~~~~~~~ A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIA . ®cT 1 4 193 COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ~,~ppBERT GIESLER 33 EAST IDAHO C T~ ~~ ~~$;~~~~~I~A7trERRwGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor Chairmen Zoning 8 Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comma t an recommendations will be considered by the Meridian ` may we have your answer by: TRANSMITTAL DATE : ,~~ _~r,..µ:'~(Er4RING DATE : -~L.~~ l 6~ ''' .~ ~~~ REQUEST: /-'t/~Gi~ ~~G~~~l~~[~~ C~'f" c._.#`OS:.. r'D ~~ _ SUiS,dr~IJ(j~ BY: LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJEt ._ ;px _ ~1= `' JIM JOHNSON P/1 MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/I tIM HEPU~R, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C BOB GIESLER, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY 6ARY SMITH, P.E,,~ ENGINEER WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER ~r ~, a : ~ c°•c~riw ~ ~- cit. ~ r -~<~; _ 1 ~ I T U't'i`Y' L LI ~ o_., ~~ fr r~ INiIDI~N SCHOOL DISTRICT ff ~~~IERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM ANDrvFINAL PLATS) ~• ADA_CflUNTY HIGHWAI DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR.~DISTRTCT SETTLERS IRRIGATION°DISTRICT ~. IDRHO POWER-C~(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) " '` .~:~:~: iJEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS ) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) CITY FILES / /~ OTHER: / ~ -' `~ `7 YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: ~~ T11~ Cp~•y~~®~ l3 ~.5 (x9 ~ G~- te=e ~® `~ ~ e ~~~~ ~ ~ ~.g sv c.c.s T ~c ~. ~ T ~ ~~ • Meridian City Council November 3, 1993 Page 2 Forrey: Yes, Mr. Mayor, Councilman Corrie, in the Comprehensive Plan this section of Locust Grove Road is designated as a bike lane, and so Mr. Dodge is indicating that this Plat has to comply and that would be one of the items in the development agreement we've talked to Hubble about so that will be covered. Corrie: Okay, thank you. Kingsford: Any other questions? Is there a motion? Tolsma: Mr. Mayor I would move we approve the Final Plat for Cougar Creek Subdivision subject to the City Engineers comments being met and the Planning Directors comments of compliance of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max that we approve the Final Plat of Cougar Creek Subdivision in condition upon the City Engineers comments being met and those compliance items with the Comprehensive Plan being satisfied with our Planning Director, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #2: FINAL PLAT: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL FOR FINAL PLAT FOR CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION ~1 BY CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT, INC.: Kingsford: Any questions Council might have for staff on that? Mr. Forrey, for my information what is the status of the discussion with Mr. Mabe and the applicant with regards to school int hat particular quadrant? Forrey: Mr. Mayor and the Council, the School District has identified a site that is just outside of the Meridian Impact area, but within the Meridian School District. These children from Crossroads would be going to that school, so I think at this point the District is satisfied that the impact can be handled in the District. Does that help? Corrie: Mr. Mayor I have another question for Wayne, they sent an Irrigation District letter about the drainage from the EPA requirements from the residential/commercial developments into their ditches. Is that something that, this is new too we're finding some new things here, does this have any effect on as far as this Final Plat is concerned? ~ i ~ Meridian City Council November 3, 1993 Page 3 Forrey: I'm sorry Councilman I'm reading this right now I haven't had a chance to study this particular letter. You know because this is a planned development general project the applicant and the City are both required to negotiate a development agreement, and look at all the development features and this is one we ought to include in that negotiation process especially now that Settlers is very specific in some design. Tolsma: We have the same problem too with the bike path way and everything else in the Crossroads Subdivision, it goes back to the school site on the backside. Forrey: Correct Kingsford: Any other questions from the Council? Corrie: Mr. Mayor, I move for the approval of Final Plat-with the approval of the City Engineers comments being met as well as the Planning Director and the approval of the application and there is one other thing also the Fire Chiefs comments about the turn arounds at the entrance of the driveway. Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Bob Corrie second by Ron to approve the Final Plat of Crossroads subject to the City Engineers comments being approved the development agreement and also the Fire Chiefs comments with regard to turn around at the end of the streets, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #3: FINAL PLAT: REQUEST~FOR APPROVAL FOR FINAL PLAT FOR FIELDSTONE MEADOWS SUBDIVISION #3 BY G.L. VOIGHT: Kingsford: Council have any questions on that? Corrie: Mr. Mayor, I move for approval of Final Plat of Fieldstone Meadows Subdivision #3 subject to the conditions set forth by the City Engineer being met. Giesler: Second Kingsford: Moved by Bob Corrie, second by Bob Giesler to approve the Final Plat for Fieldstone Meadows Subdivision #3 subject to the City Engineers comments being met, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ~~ 19 October 1994 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651.4395 FAX # 208-888-6201 Steve Mahaffy Ringert Clark Chartered P. O. Box 2773 Boise, ID 83701 Phones: Area Code 208 RECE/VED OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Boise 343-1884 O C T Z 1 1994 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Boise 345-2431 lheridian City Engineer RE: Crossroads Subdivisions - Pressure Urban Irrigation System - Relinquishment/Annexation Dear Steve: Based on the present time schedule available to the Irrigation District, the hearing for annexation on the above-referenced land will occur on Tuesday, 6 December 1994. If there is no objection on the part of the Board of Directors at that time, or if subsequently, there is not a sufficient protest to force an election 90 days thereafter, then the final Order of Annexation will be become official on Tuesday, 7 March 1995. At such time, which is a regular Board Meeting of the Irrigation District Board of Directors, the relinquishments will also be acted upon and accepted by the Board of Directors. Both the annexation and relinquishment documents will be made a matter of public record shortly after Tuesday, 7 March 1995, and place the Crossroad Subdivisions land within the boundaries of the Irrigation District with a Ridenbaugh river flow water right that is exactly the same right that the land possesses in the Rental Roll. A copy of this letter is being sent to various parties that are involved in this annexation/relinquishment process and pressure urban irrigation system so that they will have some idea as to the scheduling. I will assume that progress is continuing in the construction and inspection phases of the urban irrigation system based upon the contract between Yorgasons and the Irrigation District in relation to District standards and specifications. Page 1 of 2 D APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PRO1ECi RIGHTS - 40,000 ~ • 19 October 1994 Steve Mahaffy Page 2 of 2 Should you have any questions concerning this topic, please feel free to call on me. Sincerely, Daren R. Coon, Secretary/Treasurer DRC/dnm cc: File Each Director Water Superintendent Attorney - Ringert Attorney - JoAnn Butler Capital Development - Yorgason City of Meridian - Gary Smith __ Bt l.FSEa.Q e cnP (FOUND) • ® sEr s/e' x a0' IRaa PIN rrnN Ptasnc cAP ~ SET 1/2 X 24' IRON PW S ~ ~• W wRti. C CAP y e C1U.CULAIED POWT ~ w ~O ~~~ .. PROPERLY BOUNDARY 5 ~ ~,4 wy~' '.,r$ ~$,~~ ~ PUBLIC U'NJ71E3. DRAWAC.E AND ~S '~\~°' ~ ~ ~ !e~ I - -- -- QtR1OAl1~1 EASELIENT 10' FROLL O ~ ~s ~N~ ~ ~~ .. ~~• PROPER'iY LINE I .~ ~^ I ~ ser~~~`a ~~' ea ~G I - H tAT UNE I a O3F?,,+ ~ ~s~ ® L.OT NUIdBER ~ ~~R4~_•`~a~W ~`~cp~ 0.sa~'.q • aO \~,Y~P g G'~ ~~C~ .- H nOr~p ~ d ppe 4'~ 3y~ SR C TA.O,F• JN J ~ 70' ~~ ~ © nj~ P O R ~~ seal ar w a :~~ n/N f I ~LSOC ~ ~ 2 Lp I N 88'81'30' W ~BeaL•47" w " ~,~rzo, e 0.00' 1L ~, r H S eeal'S0' E G9 ~,~ ~ ~~ B O O ~ o UNPLATIED _ _.. ~I . B ~~~. ~ ~ ~ -.~9, ,. '° 6 Z 70• 1 b ~ C-8 a I ~ ° N 88'31'30' W S ~ 7.4 • ~? ~, '~ b g S" 1a00' N eB•oe5e• w .~,~~ s: I ~ 148.44'7.42' z (~ ~ 2 ~.~$ ~' a 29. N 01'0810' E ~' O~ .,~ d ~ .,K ..3983 a ~j 10.00' k ~sy~.~, a o I • 4'o Sooo' _ _ N 88'S1•~' W 388.x' ~ _~~ >°~sT ro ~ °~` d~~,9v`rO ~ oil _ I ~ s BB'S1a0' E 045.38' ~ o-12 ` ~e ~ O AQd~$ b ~ nb ~v o ~~ ~ ~ 1~z~aao - '~ a 1 1.38' ~ P 1 K''~ ~~ °~ 121,8' ~ _- 8/7g•4r ~~C 3 ~ iii r J E ~EN7UL DRIVE _ ~ 6dC_~~ 0.r I ~ ~`~~~ aos E Le.sa• ``~~`"' Zi ,` Sam S 8~8 1 S0~ € 'J~88 ~ \ 6 ~ ~, ~'' ~ ~ ~~ N 01'08'10' E ~4 a ~° d C\• nd • Q8 z S •. W 1ao0' ~ < lO b~ S 88"31'30 E ~' ~ ~ a~ z N eaoz o• E 27Q s Ra ~,~~ 70.00'_ ~ ~ o c-2 1ao0' ~ ~•~ ~ s _ s 70' ~{ Z' UNPLATIFD I~ 'v 34~~ ~ Og R ~ 10 N 3 ~ s aeaLaLr' ~. I~ ~ C y ~ ~8 ~ ~. a5.29•'~ 0. 0. ~_ 70. ~ ~ N 88'81'47' W \~ ~ C- 4 47 S 88'31'30' E Z 10.00' ~ ~ O3g3y~e Q c-zl N ". I 2 19.45 vj 3 REAL PWNT OF IR:GINNING WI71AL P01 N maL•a7• w ~, R~ ~ g stir r x ae- PEE owe B/s x xa• seaL P9+ t PLJIBIIC cAP I I ,, ~, ~a4.5e• 3 ~.1F`A ~ ,~'~~ ~ t9.zr I N07E5: ~ 0 a ~, I ~, ~) ~plg 5) ~S ~ CONFDWA TO 1NE APPLICABLE ZOpIQ,IO REglLARONS ~ ~ Or ~ ~ mq 8 y ^~, o n Ir{ 2) ALL LOT LULFS Cp8A0N TO A PUBLIC Rl9HT-~ tlO1Y LINE HAVE A 7FN UO) FDOT ,~''b p LLmE PERMANENT PUBLIC 1I75JRE3. DRAPIAOE. AND S00OARON EASDIF7JT. s 123.98'~~ ~ 103.N4~ ~, 3) ~ sUeDlwoN ~ sua~cr To Lx»BnIANCE rA7tl tiiE mAHO Lx4)E sECnoN ~ ~ M ~ ~ y 31-3868 CON~L11N0 ~RI6AT~N HATER. _ 1 Oy~p. ~ `7 173.7a 4) ANY RFStIBD1VCStON ~ 7L53 PLAT stlMl COMPLY LR7H TfB APPLICABLE yDNMB (/N ~8881'4Y W d REOULARa4s De EFFECT AT 7HE mIE of RESUBIHVISICN. NO.~' ~ ~ ~ ~2. ~ EACH 9DE of De1IIOOR LOT L6iFS HAVE A FIVE (8) L~D7' PERILAHIIer PUBLIC u1ul7~s. 6ewoana4. AHD oRaNALIE EAR 8) ALL LOTS TATwN T753 ate6msaoN ARE s¢+aE-FAMaY RESDFrrnAL Lo~S, ExLSrr Lor ® 0°• ~ ~ ~ W N 823 t. BLB~K 1. LOpT,t BLOCK ~ LOT 1. BLOCK 3, L.oT 1. BLOCK b LOT 1. BLOCIL 0. 1100_ 0 TWNm ~ MAINTAD D BY 7~ LLRD~ HOMWNER"SD16~SSOdA~710d~1. AREA LAIS. . =- » cE ~o ~ixEo Ln~ suaLP~RE~N°s~m~~ASas>~ a ~A"~ S ~1 ~• E S Lei witl9An0H/DRA6+A6E DLSLRICr. 9) 11~eE HIaFffS'T q~40A~e~sFA'~NAL. GLeoUNp LIIATER F1EV~AR01~4. A IIQJOBIN ~ 12' ABOVE 2 8 9 F NPI y PLAT SHOWING CRaSSRDADS SUBDIVISION ND. A PORTION OF THE NW1 /4, SECTION 9, T.3N., R.1 E., B:M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 1994. • NUBBLE ENGINEERING. INC. • BOISE. IDAHO l,o~ IKON PIN IKON PW S ~~~~ W I> 50.00' ti ~ r 3d W `~o r~~ • ~ ~ nRY `' ~t4 w 'rr ~ ~& ~t'~ ~'~' DRAWAGE AND y ~ ,ENT 10' FROM O ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ Cr~j•~.d >~~ a_. I y, ~ ye~,,~g• 6 ~ ~~~~~~~ q ~ 6 a ~ 1 .w ~ aa~~' a3~• ay qs~? •Y'wy w y~`~ ~~~ ~ O a'P~ . M~ O ~ ~~`~' N 704 ~0• W •N esatar v~ ~ _~ ~ N 81~ 8~ W 5'p4• W ~66s/•ar w S 89'22'28• W ~ 66 0 ¢ (i ~iJi N it ~ N 4D alp. fW '~ 78.32• ~ y m P 3~d1 ~¢ ~' s a~ 2O i, ~ sazt z 2oa4 ~Z ~,~~~9~~ O E~~~'y \®~ b-t b~ ~~ • s eaa3~ w ~ `~ q~>6 ~ ~ ~ ~ K 4 ~ 8 ~.~ ©~ ~ Go9 ~# ~6c~ Te ~ Z ~ ~ O ~ O ;3 s ~ ~ ~ ~'/~ Z ~fLAGXI g ~ '~ 3~z X00 ~.on N es'a~asr w • ~? °`~ 70.E 3q~.~4 ~~ro t1 Toed ~ E °' G-78 ' ,~ 146.aa'7A7 ,~t~~i s 6t E ~~~ `~ a6. o-77 ~. ~# w ~r A ;4 O~l9~d~8~ ~ bQ dy~.3483 3 3$17 ,~ C-7a 0-75 ~ ~ ~7 _`n ~3 3 1 I a~ ~~ _p..~ °~ar d,~ ,~ R $gW,3ti ' $ 35s~ = 1 ~11`~~$~+'~~~~ O _ ~_ ~ ~_ BLA;iY 4 4,3 4~ ~~ Q~e17 E .Se ~ ~ ~ >~ m n N o ^3~ ~m `~' ~ ~ G,~ S 6522'43' E N 85'2$48' E ® ~o ~ N ~~ t" e"`~ d'~' y ~ N ~a>ae,' E ~ev3'~, E • 4 ~.,a t~• ® BL~ t ~ ~. ~ Ol 17.11' N 171 ~ap , t~J }: Z m pp .p 44 ~ ~ Z W +L+ O q hd s 396 R K O K O .~ 5n3559 £ 7p~,pu n N M'S1'ar,W ~~ 0.~ Q 447.66' 3&88'S C-25 _,~~fp~ E t42~~,,,~~ °- ~~ 2g,6p• Z ~ 4I .~93Q,s 0-zt N 6621'46' E C-27 Pte'"~ ~-30 ~~ W ~.`_ 7a~ a 3~ 1 _ m ~~ ~I O 10.43' ~ir~ ; ~ 88.21• C-26 ~ X26 1A ~3 ~ ~ .'pp N 88'6t'4r W ~ ~ Q C-i6 70.00' ~ 3 a 3g(o5 ~ ~j © ~ °y 0 ~ g 0 ~ ~ ~ 14bB8' 'ip m 3521 354 i Y "i ~- i<EGULA710NS ~ g 0• ~ t~ K, to ~7~ M 88'4 '~• E W TEN (10 F00T •- N 8681'ar W ~ m m ~ 7 ~ E 13x11' :[KENT. ~ 123.M'~w '~-703.7 70.0l7~'~ N ~' `yS --E SEC710N s 4 1y~, O~ ~ ~ N 8821'48• E N 83 t. "' E t4'~ ~I. 47] O2'EC ~ `7 173.7~C ~~O ~0 ~ (~I J., 1!; ~aolE ZONOJO A ~7 E1+T Pusuc uTOJ'RF$ 1~t&tm M ~ asofi' 76x8 S " h ~ z3z~ • 46.06• ~z I r; ~q.7 ~ 48 g N 873048 E 3g JTLO B ~ T LOT ® Oa ~ ~s f~ W N E3•Z1• Z~ 83.09 `S 80 •.38• E OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., Clty Clerk JANICE L GASS, Clty Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Flre Chief W.L "BILL" GORDON, Police Chlsf WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (ZOS) 887.4813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. I{INGSFORD Mayor August 29, 1994 Idaho Power Company 130 East Idaho P.O. Box 428 Meridian, Idaho 83680 888-4491 RE: STREET LIGHTS FOR CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION NO. 1 COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner & Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman • Planning 8 Zoning Street Lights have been installed by the developer in Crossroads Subdivision No. 1. These are 100 watt high pressure sodium lights on steel poles, owned by the City of Meridian. The eight (8) street lights are located at: Lot 1 Block 3 - Main Entrance Island Lot 1 Block 4 - Entrance Island Lot 1 Block 6 - 1043 N. Fillmore Way Lot 3 Block 6 - 3471 E. Eisenhower Drive Lot 8 Block 6 - 3423 E. Eisenhower Drive Lot 1 Block 8 - 3621 E. Eisenhower Drive Lot 2 Block 5 - 3437 E. Presidential Drive Lot 7 Block 10- 3591 E. Presidential Drive See attached map for additional information. Please use this letter as your authority to activate these street tights. Sincerely, ~f,~,~z~,~. William G. Berg, Jr. City Clerk u • ,~' k2* W ~~'S8l N 02'16'21' W .i£'£9~ ~l ~9,~~ W .rI$[g`~LO ~ ~ 'g« ~g.~t 132.17' i~0 0.00 N 4~• ~, "~0 N 3 .BL W N ~ 1321 ~ ~ ~ ~ F " ~ ~d $ su ;t9xc- ~ 0 ~ d ~ d. d ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ a ,ms~oo N ~ ~ d ~ 0 W ~W 1 w T~ _N ~ so3,2oe'e ~~~ $~~~ 3 N 1~~77 gg 8 d t18.4~ ~ W ~ ® old I 110.84' ~ ~ ^ ,~'~ N 31 ~Ir w ~ b~+-~n.~ ~ ~ N 12~'~~ s ~ ~~ $~ 'g OcT ~ ~ ~ W r'1 fix. $ ~ E W 11 g . E 3 3 3 118.44 S 118.04 ® ~ ~ ~` 11~ ~ y ypp~~ w~ ~ ~ O ~~ d ~,' 0 ~~' ~w~~N+IZ ~o°~ar a. 6~, O w ~ o~ t t ~ 1~ ^ N 1 a, ~ Y A4Aaoo s m ~ ~~ ~ ®~~ ~ ~ d 8 1 t'3'a~~,[, E m O ~ ~ i ~ t Afro 00 Jl ~~1~OS~` ~ Z fA ~ O i ~ ~ O ~ N t . ~~ N ~ a ~ ~ O I~ ~ Z . o`P ~' m ~~ ~~s ~ ~~t -" d s maa'1r e y ~, ~, Or,[ gt W a .cic-ao N ~ ~ .c[,n..~ s °' ~ ~ m W ea. W ~p ~`~ ~ ~~~'b •ir~~~t'I` d O ~ ~ S ~ n ~~O N 018'11' W ~' ~ lNl~ O d w '~ ID o ~ ,t ~G ~7 ~gC~ ~ r S {~! ~i C~ ~ S ~ '~'4ll ai ~~i{ ~~ ~ & . ~ ~ " 8 p178°I2~ E ~~ ~I t ~~ S ~ d ,fir ~/~ 'lp~~ II/ ~3 -~~.c-.9p N M 'ri'b S' .. © (O • z Nib' ~ ~ ~ ~ N oD ,~~ `i~ . dbg ~ ~+ d a44 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ^1 ~ ~ 0 b. m N ~1 ~r w d ~ ~~ ~ 0 z Z ory~ 1- m ~ .~f ,,e Sb orb ~3. ~ q 0 z ~ 0 r71d~ Arm ~ "~ ~ ~.yo'oie~ s b ~ ey al ~ M ~~ [ b do9C 3 R o ,~ °~~v~ee ~ 3 ~, M',cbeaw S e N ~ ~ N m ~2' w '~'~~ 3 h ~ ~• d byOO ctO ~'~, ?d~ a-~44•C~ A0'OG 0-44 <bf ^; ~ by ~ "" 9'b ~ ~' d~ a £°a N77L~ - n~ ,~~1 .p. ^bF ~~ ~ ~6F ~ 64i1~+ ~ s n /o[ r ~ ~ ^ d d w d+. ~ s gf 96 <F'~ ~ ~+ a ~ q g~ ~ ~ ~ b ^ a1' o~ a ~n a G = 6 s [ob Q '° ~, ~ a~ ~~ ~ g 0 ~ ~'`~ ~ ~ ~ # ~ 0 ~~,'~ f6O is ~' ~ d ° ~ 1 a '~- ~ ~ ~~ °~sq~ ~a tel~ ~ ~~- O ~ d ~ ^ ~ ~ ^ z ~~~,-q~n'~ S 'fib ~~~$ s~^~dr ~ ~, ~ O S ^ O ~ O d O d .eel' l s~ .bb~32 ~ ~ iLadt - ~ ~ ~ - ~t zip 'w ~ -~-1 M .£t.BO:W~S ~/ dam' / w .{~ / / J ''1~ / ~F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s~ ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~d~ A ~ I ~ _~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ e ~; mad ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ^~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ did ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I z (W ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ b a~ o ~ 0 , w 3 W W yl n ^ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~.s~ I I ~ Vy ~ g b~ ~ ~ ~ b$ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ I ~ ® ~ ~ ~ ~~ Z I ~ ~~ b" ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~~ I z I °' z W ~ ~ a ~ ~ o F ~~ r ~ ~~ ~ ~~a ~~ ~ .ot,80.1A N Sd 3 .Ol.1BO.40 N ~ ~ ~ z sr ~ ^. s s d O .. d"° z ,~b ~~~ 5 ~ Z ~ ~ $M.0 ~S _ _ _ .r~~ra4t 8 ,4orou _ _ ~ ~ - - - a .4YOYR a A1.4oW N ti - ~sW . ON!?1V38 10 SlSVB ~~ ~ JUYW 3U/1S) W31DYd HItION'J Key Bank of Idaho A KeyCorp Bank Real Estate Construction Key Financial Center - 5th Floor 702 West Idaho Street P.O. Box 2800 Boise, Idaho 83701 (208) 334-7145 July 13, 1994 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Avenue Meridian,. ID 83642 Re: Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit Ramon Yorgason Crossroads Sub. Issued: 04/14/94 Amount: $10,500.00 Dear Sirs, ~an~Nx In order to update our construction file on the referenced subdivision, please send me a copy of your most recent inspection and the appropriate Letter of Credit reductions and/or releases. Your prompt response will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, ~ ~'~~, /'~,'r Reed Coleman Vice President America's neighborhood bank. Key Bank of Idaho Commercial & Inte K 702 West Idaho rnational Services N ~ -` Bolse, ID 83702 Kt ~ BANK OF IDAHO KEY BANK OF IDAHO KE5' HANK OF IDAHO KEY 6.4NK OF IDAHO KEY BANK OF IDAHO KEY BANK Of IDAHO KEY HANK OF IDAHO KEl' BANK OF IDAHO KEY BANK OF IDAHO KEY BANK OF IDAHO KEY BANK OF IDAHO KEY BANK OF b r x O G z _ _ ~ 'O _ O APRIL 14, 1994 2 a l 0 ` WE HEREBY ESTABLISH OUR IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. 21-1368 IN _ FAVOR OF CITY OF MERIDIAN, 33 IDAHO AVENUE, MERIDIAN, IDAHO .83642, FOR THE o _ ACCOUNT OF J. RAMON YORGASON 8E MARILYN YORGASON, 2304 N. COLE RD., SUITE A, BOISE, IDAHO 83704, UP TO THE AGGREGATE AMOUNT OF TEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED ` m ` AND N0/104 U.S. DOLLARS (~10,500A0) AVAILABLE BY BENEFICIARY'S DRAFTS DRAWN AT _ SIGHT ON KEY BANK OF IDAHO, 702 WEST IDAHO STREET, BOISE, IDAHO 83702, AND s ACCOMPANIED BY THE DOCUMENT(S) SPECIFIED BELOW: z 1. BENEFICIARY'S SIGNED STATEMENT STATING "THE DEVELOPER HAS DEFAULTED AND FAILED TO COMPLETE THE INSTALLATION OF STREET LIGHTS AS REQUIRED iN THE o DEVELOPMENT OF CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION". PARTIAL DRAWINGS ARE PERMITTED. IN THE EVENT OF A PARTIAL DRAWING, THE ORIGINAL ~= LETTER OF CREDIT MUST BE RETURNED FOR ENDORSEMENT OF THE AMOUNT PAID. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS EFFECTIVE APRIL 14, 1994, m t WE HEREBY AGREE WITH DRAWERS, ENDORSERS AND BONA FIDE HOLDERS THAT ALL a DRAFTS DRAWN UNDER AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS CREDIT SHALL MEET WITH DUE HONOR UPON PRESENTATION AND DELIVERY OF DRAFTS AND DOCUMENTS AS o SPECIFIED TO KEY BANK OF IDAHO, INTERNATIONAL BANKING, 702 WEST IDAHO STREET, BOISE, IDAHO 83702. ~ ~~ THIS LETTER OF CREDIT EXPIRES APRIL 13, 1995 AT OUR COUNTERS. Y ALL BANK CHARGES OTHER THAN THOSE OF KEY BANK OF IDAHO ARE FOR ACCOUNT OF 0 BENEFICIARY. - EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED HEREIN, THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS SUBJECT TO THE UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS, 1993 REVISION, INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PUBLICATION NO. 500, WHICH IS INCORPORATED o h INTO THE TEXT OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT BY THIS REFERENCE. t KEY BANK OF IDAHO t - i G i ` / ] ~ (A T Z SIGNAT (AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE) Q - o o o Z T ~%NVH Ai% OHYaI i0 %NYH A3% OHY4(i0 %NVH A3% OHYOI i0 NNYH A3% OHYOI i0 %NYH Ai% OHYOI i0 %NYH AH% OHYOI i0 %NYH AH% OHYQI i0 MNYH A3% OHYOI i0 %NYH A3% OHYOI i0 %NYH A3% OHYClI i0 %NYH Ai% OH THE FACE OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS A GRAY PANTOGRAPH BACKGROUND a YOI i0 %NYH A3% OH Member FDIC PRESENTATION DATE I AMOUNT IN FIGURES AND WORDS I NAME, STAMP AND SIGNATURE OF BANK OTHER ANNOTATIONS OF THE NOMINATED BANK: