Loading...
2022-12-15 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:00 PM MINUTES PRESENT Commissioner Patrick Grace Commissioner Andrew Seal Commissioner Maria Lorcher Commissioner Steven Yearsley ABSENT Commissioner Nathan Wheeler Commissioner Mandi Stoddard ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] Approved Motion made by Commissioner Lorcher, Seconded by Commissioner Grace. Voting Yea: Commissioner Grace, Commissioner Seal, Commissioner Lorcher, Commissioner Yearsley 1. Approve Minutes of the December 1, 2022 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] ACTION ITEMS 2. Public Hearing for Dutch Bros Ustick and Eagle (H-2022-0077) by Andrew Bowman, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., located at the four (4) lots at the southwest corner of N. Eagle Rd. and E. Ustick Rd. intersection Continued to January 5, 2023 Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2022-0077 A. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a new 1,154 square foot, dual drive- through Dutch Bros. coffee restaurant on approximately 1.2 acres of land in the C-G zoning district. B. Request: Development Agreement Modification to allow the requested drive-through use by updating the overall concept plan of the approved Development Agreement (Inst. #2019-121599). Motion to continue to January 5, 2023 made by Commissioner Lorcher, Seconded by Commissioner Grace. Voting Yea: Commissioner Grace, Commissioner Seal, Commissioner Lorcher, Commissioner Yearsley 3. Public Hearing for Promenade Cottages Subdivision (H-2022-0013) by Steve Arnold, A-Team Consultants, located at 403 E. Fairview Avenue Continued to January 19, 2023 Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2022-0013 A. Request: Rezone of approximately 0.535 acres of land from the R-8 zone to the C-G zoning district, 0.326 acres of land from the C-G to the R-40 zoning district, and 6.284 acres of land from the R-8 zone to the R-40 zoning district (6.61 acres of R-40 total). B. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 30 single-family residential lots, 5 multi-family lots, 2 commercial lots and 8 common lots on 7.64 acres of land in the requested R-40 and C-G zoning districts. C. Request: Conditional Use Permit for 90 multi-family units on approximately 2.8 acres in the requested R-40 zone. D. Request: Conditional Use Permit for proposed ten (10) single-family detached lots within the requested R-40 zoning district. E. Request: Conditional Use Permit to allow the continuance of the non- conforming use of a mobile home park for an extended time period in the requested R-40 zone. Motion to continue to January 19, 2023 made by Commissioner Grace, Seconded by Commissioner Lorcher Voting Yea: Commissioner Grace, Commissioner Seal, Commissioner Lorcher, Commissioner Yearsley 4. Public Hearing for Meridian OZ Apartments (H-2022-0073) by Realm Venture Group, located at 1475 E. Franklin Rd. Continued to January 19, 2023 Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2022-0073 A. Request: Development Agreement Modification to the existing Development Agreement (Inst.#99121334 AZ-99-005 Cobblestone Village) to remove the subject property from the agreement and enter into a new agreement for the proposed multi-family development. B. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a multi-family development consisting of 60 dwelling units on 2.39 acres of land in the R-40 zoning district. Motion to continue to January 19, 2023 made by Commissioner Lorcher, Seconded by Commissioner Grace Voting Yea: Commissioner Grace, Commissioner Seal, Commissioner Lorcher, Commissioner Yearsley 5. Public Hearing for Guthries Drive-Through (H-2022-0081) by Nicolette Womack, Kimley-Horn, located at 1840 W. Chinden Blvd., near the northwest corner of N. Linder Rd. and W. Chinden Blvd. Approved Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2022-0081 A. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a new approximate 2,083 square foot quick serve restaurant with a drive-through located within 300 feet of an existing drive-through. Motion to approve made by Commissioner Grace, Seconded by Commissioner Lorcher Voting Yea: Commissioner Grace, Commissioner Seal, Commissioner Lorcher, Commissioner Yearsley 6. Public Hearing for KeyBank Meridian Branch (H-2022-0076) by HSB Architects + Engineers, located at 3513 W. Chinden Blvd. Approved Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2022-0076 A. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a drive-through establishment within 300 feet of another drive-through establishment, an existing residence and residential zoning district on 1.04 acres of land in the C-G zoning district. Motion to approve made by Commissioner Grace, Seconded by Commissioner Lorcher Voting Yea: Commissioner Grace, Commissioner Seal, Commissioner Lorcher, Commissioner Yearsley ADJOURNMENT 7:08 P.M. Meridian Planning and Zoning Meeting December 15, 2022. Meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of December 15, 2022, was called to order at 6:07 p.m. by Chairman Andrew Seal. Members Present: Chairman Andrew Seal, Commissioner Steven Yearsley, Commissioner Patrick Grace and Commissioner Maria Lorcher. Members Absent: Commissioner Nate Wheeler and Commissioner Mandi Stoddard. Others Present: Joy Hall, Kurt Starman, Bill Parsons, Stacy Hersh and Dean Willis. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE Nate Wheeler X Maria Lorcher Mandi Stoddard (Vacant) _X Steven Yearsley X Patrick Grace X Andrew Seal - Chairman Seal: Good evening. Welcome to the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting for December 15th, 2022. At this time I would like to call the meeting to order. The Commissioners who are present at this evening's meeting are at City Hall and on Zoom. We also have staff from the city attorney and clerk's offices, as well as the City Planning Department. If you are joining on Zoom this evening we can see that you are here. You may observe the meeting. However your ability to be seen on screen and talk will be muted. During the public testimony portion of the meeting you will be unmuted and, then, be able to comment. Please note that we cannot take questions until the public testimony portion. If you have a process question during the meeting, please, e-mail cityclerk@ meridiancity.org and they will reply as quickly as possible. If you simply want to watch the meeting we encourage you to watch this streaming on the city's YouTube channel. You can access that at meridiancity.org/live. With that let's begin with the roll call. Madam Clerk. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Seal: Okay. With that the first item on the agenda is the adoption of the agenda. Files No. H-2022-0077 for Dutch Bros Ustick and Eagle, H-2022-0013 for Promenade Cottages Subdivision and H-2022-0073 from Meridian OZ -- OZ Apartments will be open for the sole purpose of continuing to a regularly scheduled meeting. They will only open for that purpose. So, if there is anybody here tonight to testify for those applications we will not be taking testimony on them. Can I get a motion to adopt the agenda as presented? Grace: Mr. Chairman, so moved. Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission December 15,2022 Page 2 of 20 Lorcher: Second. Seal: It's been moved and seconded to adopt the agenda. All in favor say aye. Okay. No opposed. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] 1. Approve Minutes of the December 1, 2022 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Seal: Next item on the agenda is the Consent -- Consent Agenda and we only have one item on the agenda, which is to approve the minutes of the December 1 st, 2022, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Can I get a motion to accept the Consent Agenda as presented? Lorcher: So moved. Grace: Second. Seal: It's been moved and seconded to adopt the Consent Agenda. All in favor say aye. None opposed, motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Seal: Now I will take a minute here to explain the public hearing process. We will open each item individually and we will begin with the staff report. Staff will report their findings on how the item adheres to our Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code. After staff has made their presentation the applicant will come forward to present their case and respond to staff comments. They will have 15 minutes to do so. After the applicant is finished we will open the floor to public testimony. Each person will be called on only once during the public testimony. The clerk will call names individually of those who have signed up on our website in advance to testify. You will, then, be unmuted in Zoom or you can come to the microphone in Chambers. You need to state your name and address for the record and you will have three minutes to address the Commission. If you have previously sent pictures or a presentation for the meeting, it will be displayed on the screen. If you have established that you are speaking on behalf of a larger group, like an HOA, where others from that group will allow you to speak on their behalf, you will have up to ten minutes. After all those who have signed up in advance have spoken, we will invite any others who may wish to testify. If you wish to speak on the topic you may come forward in Chambers or if on Zoom press the raise hand button in the Zoom app. Or if you are listening on a phone please press Star 9 and wait for your name to be called. If you are listening on multiple devices, such as a computer and a phone, please, be sure to mute those extra devices, so we do not experience feedback and we can hear you clearly. When you are finished, if the Commission does not have questions for you, you Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission December 15,2022 Page 3 of 20 will return to your seat in Chambers or be muted on Zoom and you will no longer have the ability to speak. And, please, remember we generally do not call you back up a second time. After all testimony has been heard the applicant will be given another ten minutes to come back and respond. When the applicant is finished responding to questions and concerns, we will close the public hearing and the Commissioners will have the opportunity to discuss and hopefully be able to make final decisions and recommend -- recommendations to City Council as needed. ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] ACTION ITEMS 2. Public Hearing for Dutch Bros Ustick and Eagle (H-2022-0077) by Andrew Bowman, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., located at the four (4) lots at the southwest corner of N. Eagle Rd. and E. Ustick Rd. intersection A. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a new 1,154 square foot, dual drive-through Dutch Bros. coffee restaurant on approximately 1.2 acres of land in the C-G zoning district. B. Request: Development Agreement Modification to allow the requested drive-through use by updating the overall concept plan of the approved Development Agreement (Inst. #2019-121599). Seal: So, at this time I would like to open the public hearing for Item No. H-2022-0077 for a continuance to January 5th to allow for correction of the noticing error. Lorcher: Mr. Chair? Mr. Chair? Seal: Commissioner Lorcher, go ahead. Lorcher: I move that application -- or Item No. H-2022-0077 be continued to January 5th. Grace: Second. Yearsley: Second. Seal: It's been moved and seconded to continue Item No. H-2022-0077 to January 5th. All in favor, please, say aye. No opposed. Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. 3. Public Hearing for Promenade Cottages Subdivision (H-2022-0013) by Steve Arnold, A-Team Consultants, located at 403 E. Fairview Avenue Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission December 15,2022 Page 4 of 20 A. Request: Rezone of approximately 0.535 acres of land from the R-8 zone to the C-G zoning district, 0.326 acres of land from the C-G to the R-40 zoning district, and 6.284 acres of land from the R-8 zone to the R-40 zoning district (6.61 acres of R-40 total). B. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 30 single-family residential lots, 5 multi-family lots, 2 commercial lots and 8 common lots on 7.64 acres of land in the requested R-40 and C-G zoning districts. C. Request: Conditional Use Permit for 90 multi-family units on approximately 2.8 acres in the requested R-40 zone. D. Request: Conditional Use Permit for proposed ten (10) single-family detached lots within the requested R-40 zoning district. E. Request: Conditional Use Permit to allow the continuance of the nonconforming use of a mobile home park for an extended time period in the requested R-40 zone. Seal: Okay. I would like to open public hearing number H-2022-0013 for Promenade Cottages Subdivision for continuance to January 19th to allow the applicant more time to provide staff with additional documentation. Grace: Mr. Chairman? Seal: Go right ahead. Grace: I move that we continue File No. H-2022-0013 to our January 19, 2023, meeting. Lorcher: Second. Seal: It's been moved and seconded to continue Item H-2022-0013 to January 19th. All in favor, please, say aye. None opposed. Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. 4. Public Hearing for Meridian OZ Apartments (H-2022-0073) by Realm Venture Group, located at 1475 E. Franklin Rd. A. Request: Development Agreement Modification to the existing Development Agreement (Inst.#99121334 AZ-99-005 Cobblestone Village)to remove the subject property from the agreement and enter into a new agreement for the proposed multi-family development. B. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a multi-family development consisting of 60 dwelling units on 2.39 acres of land in the R-40 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission December 15,2022 Page 5 of 20 zoning district. Seal: All right. At this time I would like to open H-2022-0073 for Meridian OZ Apartments for continuation in January 19th to work with staff on revisions to the development plan. Lorcher: Mr. Chair? Seal: Commissioner Lorcher, go ahead. Lorcher: I move that application H-2022-0073 continue to January 19th. Grace: Second. Seal: It's been moved and seconded to continue File No. H-2022-0073 to January 19th. All in favor, please, say aye. None opposed. Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. 5. Public Hearing for Guthries Drive-Through (H-2022-0081) by Nicolette Womack, Kimley-Horn, located at 1840 W. Chinden Blvd., near the northwest corner of N. Linder Rd. and W. Chinden Blvd. A. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a new approximate 2,083 square foot quick serve restaurant with a drive-through located within 300 feet of an existing drive-through. Seal: Okay. Now for the real stuff. At this time I would like to open File No. H-2022-0081 for Guthries Drive-Through and we will begin with the staff report. Hersh: Good evening, Mr. Chair and Commissioners. The applicant is here to discuss their project -- or present their project for Guthries Drive-Through, which is a conditional use permit. The site consists of 0.96 -- or 0.69 acres of land, zoned C-C, located at 1840 West Chinden Boulevard. The history on the property -- the most recent is in 2015 the Commission approved a conditional use permit for a Carl's Jr. that has since expired at that location. The Comprehensive Plan FLUM designation is mixed-use community and a restaurant is a principally permitted use in the C-C zoning district. A conditional use permit is required for a drive-through establishment within 300 feet of another drive- through facility, residential district and existing residents. The applicant proposes to construct a 2,083 square foot restaurant with a drive-through for a Guthries, which will contribute to the mix of uses in the area and provide another fast food option to area residents within close proximity to nearby residential development. There are specific use standards in the UDC that apply to both restaurants and drive-through use. Parking is required. Restaurant uses at one space for every 250 square feet of gross floor area. A minimum of eight spaces are required for this particular project and a total of 25 spaces are proposed, exceeding the UDC minimums. Access is provided from the shared driveway to the east proposed --or from the property to the east proposed from a driveway Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission December 15,2022 Page 6 of 20 along the northern boundary of the site and on the east along west -- or the northern boundary along West Island Green Drive and the private drive, sorry, on the -- located on the east side of the property. Direct access to Chinden Boulevard is prohibited. A drive- through use also requires the applicant to demonstrate safe pedestrian and vehicle access circulation and between adjacent properties. Site -- safe pedestrian access should be provided from the vehicle stacking lanes -- areas around the drive-through on the site. One is required from the perimeter sidewalk along Chinden to the main building entrance. Staff recommends additional pedestrian accesses to the building along the south side of the drive aisle per UDC 11-3A-19B-4 and a striped pedestrian walkway on the northeast of the site directing patrons to the building entrance. Staff recommends signage be installed ahead of each crossing warning drivers to watch out for pedestrians. Staff finds that the parking stalls to the north should be restricted for employee parking only to maximize pedestrian safety. The applicant has submitted a revised -- a revised site plan that demonstrates a better pedestrian circulation from the site plan that differs from staff's. So, staff's is on the left and the applicant's proposed is on the right. Staff supports the changes as proposed by the applicant and staff recommends a modification in addition to the condition in the staff report under Section 7-A, planning, 2-C, to reflect the pedestrian walkway changes. The site plan also shows the stack lane is a separate lane from the drive aisles and parking which provides access to the rest of the development. The proposed site layout places a drive-through -- through that starts at the northeast portion of -- corner of the site of the building and goes all the way around that -- with exits at the northeast corner and west side of the building. Also shows the pickup window on the west side of the proposed restaurant. Street buffer landscaping was -- was installed along Chinden Boulevard with the Chinden and Linder Crossing Subdivision improvements and that must be -- remain and be protected during construction on the site in accordance with UDC 11-313-10-C3. Conceptual building elevations were submitted for a single story building and that incorporates a mix of materials consisting of EIFS, brick veneer, metal awnings, metal coping, downspouts, windows and metal roofing. The final design of the structure is required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. We had a written a petition signed by numerous neighbors that live within the Spurwing -- or Spurwing Challenge Subdivision. This was included as part of the public record under public comments. The primary concern is with the excess traffic due to another restaurant with a drive-through that will bring to the neighborhood and staff recommendation for this project is approval with the conditions listed in the staff report, with the modification as requested by the applicant, and staff will also need a motion of approval to change the condition in the staff report. Thank you. That concludes the presentation. Seal: Thank you very much. Would the applicant like to come forward? Good evening, sir. We will just need your name and address for the record and the floor is yours. Candrian: Awesome. Thank you, Chair and Commissioners. My name is Connor Candrian. 1100 West Idaho Street, Boise, Idaho. Can I see the presentation from this point? Starman: Madam Chair, could you pause the clock, please. Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission December 15,2022 Page 7 of 20 Candrian: There we go. And am I -- and am I able to control it from here? Oh, got you. Cool. All right. Like I said, thank you Commissioners and Chair for allowing me to present. I'm here to present on behalf of -- behalf of Guthries for the drive-through restaurant CUP. Here is the applicant team. Myself, Lauren Pitcher and Nicolette Womack, all with Kimley-Horn. The timeline for the project. We had a preapp meeting in September. Hosted a neighborhood meeting in October. Submitted application for the CUP in October. And here we are tonight at the P&Z hearing. Here is the vicinity map for the project. As mentioned, this is a 0.96 acre site. It's currently a vacant lot. The future land use map is a mixed use community. The zoning map is zoned as community business. This is the site plan that was submitted with the CUP application and, then, the updated site plan that Stacy had presented on that addresses the conditions set forth. The proposed landscape plan. Conceptual elevations. And just to recap the staff report, mechanical equipment, trash enclosure must be screened. Pedestrian access and materials need to be looked at. Adding additional signage. Existing and proposed landscaping requirements. Adding a bicycle rack. And, then, the business hours restricted to 6:00 a.m. to 11 :00 p.m. and no direct access to Chinden. We have reviewed the staff report and are in agreement with all the conditions. Our requested action is for approval of the conditional use permit and that's all I have. Thank you. Seal: Thank you. Commissioners, do we have any questions for the staff or applicant? Grace: Mr. Chairman, I have a question for staff. Seal: Go ahead, Commissioner Grace. Grace: You mentioned there was a petition that was available in the packet. I was just having some trouble locating that. Could someone direct me to where I might find -- Seal: It's in the public testimony portion. Grace: Right. And I was -- I usually can find that, but it's -- am I missing something here or -- I just wanted to take a peek at that petition. Here is the -- yeah. Don't let me hold you up. Seal: Okay. I was going to say, if there -- if there is a question coming out of it we will -- we will get it here in a little while, so -- Grace: Okay. Seal: Okay. If there is no questions we will go ahead and have you take a seat and we will open up the public testimony portion. Madam Clerk. Hall: Yes. And we have several signed up and they had a particular order that they wanted to speak in. So, whoever wanted to speak first, please, come up. Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission December 15,2022 Page 8 of 20 Callison: Thank you, Commission. Can I ask-- this is the first time I have done this. Can I ask questions before I start? Seal: Yeah. We will need your name and address for the record, please. And then -- you can ask questions, but this isn't a back and forth dialogue, so -- Callison: Understood. It just would change my -- my discussion. First, my name is Ron Callison. My address is 2066 West Three Lakes Drive. Seal: Please speak into the microphone as well. Callison: Sorry. Ron Callison. My address is 2066 West Three Lakes Drive and that connects directly to Island Green that -- that connects to the development. I -- I just had one question. I was wondering -- I couldn't find it in any of the materials. Was there any kind of traffic study done around the volume of traffic coming in or out of this particular development and is that available to citizens? Seal: I was going to say -- I will probably refer to staff, but my -- my answer is going to be that the -- the traffic study that was done for this, because there was a previous CUP that was approved for this area, was probably not required. But that's -- Callison: Okay. Seal: -- I will -- I will let staff authoritatively respond to that. Hersh: Chair and Commissioners, there was not a required traffic study for this project. Seal: Okay. Callison: Okay. Fair enough. Thank you. So, as I said, my name is Ron Callison. I am one of the members of the Spurwing Challenge Homeowners Association. I'm not the only one that wants to speak. But I am part of that -- that -- that homeowners association and wanted to --wanted to speak tonight. I'm speaking because I have serious concerns about the traffic safety problem within our neighborhood and I'm opposed to making it even worse by adding yet another high volume restaurant without considering the impact to our specific neighborhood and if I can direct your attention to our neighborhood on the screen, it's outlined in red. Island Green comes out of the -- comes out of the commercial development and connects to West Three Lakes Road where I'm -- where I am -- I am a residence. That -- if I can just describe that to you briefly. That is a 17 -- 17 property neighborhood. There is four houses in the cul-de-sac that are kind of tucked away. There is 13 on -- on Three Lakes Drive specifically. And it's roughly a thousand feet long. It's two and a half football fields long and it is -- the neighbors -- the -- the -- the folks in the -- in the -- in the community have children. They have grandchildren. Some of them have elder parents that all are active in that -- in our particular neighborhood. And what we are seeing --what we are seeing in our neighborhood is that --what we would think would be a standard normal, pleasant, you know, one street -- one street neighborhood with no Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission December 15,2022 Page 9 of 20 existing streets coming in from the sides, no existing traffic, we thought it would be a very nice, pleasant neighborhood and -- and it's not and it's not safe and the reason we don't believe it's safe is -- I'm done at three minutes? Seal: If you could wrap up, please. Callison: Pardon me? Seal: If you could wrap up, please. Yes, sir. Callison: Wow. Okay. So, what's happened is with Chinden and that commercial development, we are the path of least resistance. We are a connector or a collector road where people come --traveling eastbound come in off Long Lake, come speeding through our neighborhood and are easily in that development without having to stop at any lights. Likewise to get out of the development they come out through our neighborhood. They don't use the other access points. They speed through our neighborhood unimpeded. They go out Long Lake, right-hand turn on Chinden, and they are free to go west and that is the core -- that's the core of our problem. We would like to -- we would like to suggest that you not approve this and we are not against development and we are not necessarily against Guthries, but we are against people getting hurt, potentially killed in our neighborhood with the amount of traffic and the speed of traffic in the neighborhood. Seal: Okay. Callison: Thank you. Seal: Quick -- quick question and, staff, you might be able to help with this. Are those ACHD roads in the subdivision or are those private roads? Parsons: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, those are dedicated right of ways. They are ACHD roads. Seal: Okay. Parsons: Except for the north-south portion of the -- the -- along the west boundary of the Guthries site, that is a private connection to Chinden there. But everything else is -- is a platted street. Seal: Okay. And I will -- because I would imagine there is going to be several more people that are going to probably come up and -- and speak to the -- speak to traffic, unfortunately, if--the roads are owned by ACHD and ACHD says that it's okay, that limits us as to having any ability to take action on that. So, unfortunately, ACHD is the -- they are the people that control the roads. That they own that road space and the report that they wrote for us showed that -- indicated that by their standards it's acceptable. Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission December 15,2022 Page 10 of 20 Callison: But that wasn't recent; right? That was when this was started to develop. Could we possibly -- I mean can this committee -- commission make a recommendation that they look at that again because of the increases in volume? Like we are seeing up to 3,000 cars a day go through our neighborhood. Seal: Understood. And we are all a little frustrated with that, the amount of traffic that we are seeing, but at this point I would say we -- we are likely not able to do that. Callison: So, you couldn't make a recommendation to ACHD to look into this, we would have to do that? Seal: Correct. Callison: Fair enough. Thank you. Seal: Thank you. Madam Clerk. Frohnmayer: Thank you. You are going to hear it again. Seal: Ma'am, we need your name and address. Frohnmayer: Yes, please. Terri Frohnmayer. 2102 West Three Lakes Drive, Meridian. As stated earlier, our neighborhood in Spurwing Challenge Estates has a real safety issue with the increase in fast moving traffic, utilizing residential -- residential streets as an access to the commercial center and from traffic just cutting through our neighborhood to avoid traffic lights. I was one of the near misses on West Island Green Road utilizing the golf cart crossing. I was nearly T-boned. Shook me up horribly. We have noticed a considerable increase in traffic and speed just over the past two years. Our neighborhood families with children and pets are very concerned with children biking and even walking on the sidewalks. It is a common hot topic discussed by our neighbors. These issues are not manufactured by our neighborhood. During the 2014 entitlement land use process for the Chinden and Linder Crossing, various concerns were identified and memorialized. Number one, regarding West Green Drive, ACHD conditioned the developer to construct traffic calming within the roadway west of the private drive. Per ACHD this was in order to reduce speeding vehicles traveling through the -- traveling through the Spurwing subdivision. Number two. Meridian City Council was concerned about cut-through traffic with the development of the commercial property. Staff was to ensure traffic calming was incorporated into the street design. Number three. The public hearing August 14, 2014. A key issue of discussion by City Council was limiting the location of any fast food restaurant to minimize impact to the adjacent residence. At that time comp plan policy 3.06.15 was applicable and recognized for this 2014 development. The policy stated: Protect existing residential properties from incompatible land use development on adjacent parcels. The 2014 mitigation -- mitigation effort, the traffic calming element has had absolutely no effect on the volume and speed of the vehicles entering our neighborhood. The impact of these --the issues today has magnified beyond anyone's anticipation back in 2014. As a result, our neighborhood safety is extremely Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission December 15,2022 Page 11 of 20 compromised and our livability and quality of life is diminishing -- diminishing. Retail, industrial -- office and industrial services are an integral part of any community. In my work experience well planned commercial developments were encouraged, promoted and welcomed by communities. However -- and this is a big however -- residential properties had priority. The neighborhoods were protected and the neighborhoods had standing, especially when it came to traffic impact. Our neighborhood wants standing. We live here. These are our homes. So, in closing, I object to the Planning and Zoning Commission approving this conditional use permit. Please allow our neighborhood time to engage with the appropriate authorities to address our issues and find solutions before this permit is approved. The additional high volume traffic generated by the applicant's use will only compound our ongoing safety and livability issues. And I thank you for your consideration. Seal: Thank you very much. Commissioner Grace, go ahead. Grace: Chairman, just a quick question. If -- if you know, Terri. Frohnmayer: Yes. Grace: Do you -- what represents the -- the largest portion of the cars going through? Is it people cutting through or is it people using those commercial establishments? Again if you know. Frohnmayer: I don't -- excuse me. I don't know for sure. We have watched and you -- you have plenty of cars cutting through coming south on -- on Linder, taking a quick right and they will --they will hit the -- hit that private road and, then, connect on Chinden again, just to miss the -- the -- the light. But a lot of them will turn right and head right down our neighborhood. But a lot of people also coming from the west side, they cut in Long Lake Way, drive down our -- our -- our street into the center, whether it's the liquor store, the car wash. We are not opposed to -- to commercial. I was a commercial broker for 35 years and -- but I have never seen anything like this, where the -- the consideration of downstream on these -- these connecting streets -- because that's what I have read, connecting. But the downstream is just -- we are -- we are really getting hammered and I'm really afraid that someone eventually is going to get killed. Grace: Thank you. Frohnmayer: You are welcome. Thank you. Seal: Thank you much. Who would like to come up next? Good evening, sir. We will need your name and address, please. W.Frohnmayer: Oh, sure thing. I'm William Frohnmayer and I live at 2102 West Three Lakes Drive. Having kind of observed what's going on here, I have -- the rapid growth for the City of Meridian in the past few years clearly -- it was not anticipated when the planning decisions were made relative to the Spurwing Challenge Estates in the Chinden Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission December 15,2022 Page 12 of 20 -- Chinden and Linder Crossing Center in 2012, '13 and '14. In retrospect, connecting a neighborhood local street to a commercial center was a poor decision, which added little value to the commercial center as it already had two access streets. As a result our neighborhood streets, West Three Lakes Drive and West Island Green, now operate as high traffic commercial collector streets and I have also become -- become aware of the -- what we call the shortcut traffic, which is originating in east and west Ada county and Canyon county, who want to avoid two traffic lights. The traffic light at Chinden and Linder and the second one at Chinden and Long Lake Drive -- Long Lake Way. In the afternoon it's amazing. If you go up and sit in the -- in the -- in the commercial center at the number of vehicles traveling from the Eagle area on Linder, who turn off onto -- in Island Green Drive, through the commercial center, and, then, proceed through our neighborhood to rejoin Chinden at Long Lake Way. Many times -- or many of them also turn onto the private street east of the Primary Health clinic to get back on -- on southbound or westbound on Chinden, a move to avoid the traffic light at -- again, it's a move to avoid the traffic light at Chinden and Linder. Clearly those who are not to turn onto the private road have not yet found out that by driving through our neighborhood they could basically avoid both traffic lights. I assume that as -- as the Guthries is approved and you have a thousand more cars per day using the center -- commercial center, a bunch of them are going to come down our way and pretty soon everybody's going to find out the way to avoid the lights is to basically drive through our neighborhood. Now, the Chinden and Linder Crossing Center already has a high level of auto oriented use. Seventy-five percent of the businesses, including Guthries, are included in that 75 percent if -- if Guthries goes through. And before the -- the Guthries conditional use is approved, guess what we are looking for is that we need to have some corrective action to basically keep from devastating -- their traffic devastating our neighborhood has it already has and I guess we support growth of new commercial businesses, but not when it contributes to the demise of the quality of life, livability, and the safety of our neighborhood Spurwing Challenge Estates. Thank you. Seal: Thank you, sir. Appreciate it. Any questions from Commissioners? Okay. W.Frohnmayer: Thanks. Seal: Good evening, sir. Need name and address, please. Stuart: Good evening my name is Neal Stuart. I live at 2148 West Three Lakes Drive with my wife. We are longtime Meridian residents. In fact, we both attended elementary school just right down the street over here. Trish and I are concerned and you have been hearing that from everyone -- regarding the traffic and the speed and so forth and so we have those same concerns. For us it's more of a personal issue because of grandchildren. Our children come over with our grandchildren. When they do park on the street, just exiting children out of the cars and car seats and so forth is -- is really a concern. So -- and I'm hearing you -- you -- that, you know, the -- the safety issue and the -- and the traffic issue may be -- you know, an Ada County Highway District concern, but, anyway, we are voicing it anyway. So, one thing that I would like to -- to bring up is it's quite interesting is that if you are coming from the west on Chinden and through a Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission December 15,2022 Page 13 of 20 Google Maps -- say you are coming from Costco let's say and you -- you Google Map to go to Primary Health and, then, you would also -- Guthries would be right similar to that, the actual mapping of that takes you left on Long Lake, down West Three Lakes Drive and into Primary Health and, then, most likely will be the same thing going into -- into Guthries versus the three or four minutes longer to go all the way up to the Linder intersection, head -- head north on Linder and, then, take the -- enter on the east side of that -- of the commercial development. Anyway our -- our grandchildren, they are three to 11 years old and whether -- you know, if they are riding, you know, small toys or -- or bikes or whatever, you know, we are concerned with them on the sidewalk and -- and the -- and the lower part of our driveway and that's a big concern for us. As you have heard, our street is being used as more of a thoroughfare, you know, as identified by even through the Google Map mapping of how to get, you know, to -- to the commercial development. As stated earlier, it's affecting our livability and, you know, Teresa and I, my wife, respectfully request that these concerns be heard in making this determination. Thank you. Seal: Thank you very much. The only one left over there, ma'am. No? Okay. Hall: I have no one else signed up. Seal: Okay. It looks like Chris online is raising his hand. Johnson: Hi, Commissioner Seal. This is Chris Johnson, city clerk. I just sent a message. Youtube is not running, so I just wanted to point that out, so the clerk can get that running for those who may be watching from home. That's all I have. Thank you. Seal: Thank you, Chris. Appreciate it. Joy, do you want to take a -- should we take a quick break, so we can get that -- okay. We will take about a five minute break here and see if we can get that to work. (Recess: 6:45 p.m. to 6:49 p.m.) Seal: All right. We will go ahead and reconvene and since Chris was our -- the last person for public testimony, unless anybody else -- there is nobody new in here. Nobody else online raising their hand, so would the applicant like to come back up? But -- but before you start I will -- I will talk to it a little bit, because the traffic considerations that are here are -- we, as a city, don't always agree with what we get from ACHD, but they do own the roads, they are the authority on it. So, unfortunately, we have to -- if they, being the authority, to tell us that those roads can handle this, we have to abide by that. So, with that I will let the applicant, please, come up and present any additional information that you would like. Candrian: Yeah. I would just like to add that we do hear the concerns, but as the Commissioners and staff have said, you know, ACHD did not recommend a -- a traffic study for this development, but we hear the concern. I'm a -- I'm a new father, so I -- I feel that, you know, I would be concerned about my-- my kids safety, too, with cut-through Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission December 15,2022 Page 14 of 20 traffic, but, unfortunately, we were not required to do a TIS report from a design perspective on the site. As it pertains to traffic, the access to the east is existing and the access to the west that we are proposing is aligned with the Primary Health access. We felt that this was the -- the best case scenario we could design our accesses to for the site. So, that's all I have. Seal: Okay. Thank you very much. Can I get a motion to close the public hearing for File No. H-2022-0081? Grace: So moved. Lorcher: Second. Seal: It's been moved and seconded to close the public hearing for File No. H-2022- 0081. All in favor, please, say aye. None opposed. Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Seal: Who would like to go first? Yearsley: Mr. Chair? Seal: Commissioner Yearsley, please, go ahead. Yearsley: So, the only action that we have today is to approve or disapprove the drive- through and that's really our -- our -- our action. The restaurant itself is a principal permitted use. I -- I do understand the homeowners' frustration about traffic. But I don't know -- the way it sounds to me it's not related to this facility and my recommendation would be to reach out to ACHD. I know in our subdivision we have had similar instances where we have had high speed traffic and they have come out and done studies and -- and have identified traffic calming measures to help, you know, try to minimize traffic or slow traffic down. A couple of things that they have done in our subdivision is actually making the -- the roadway a little narrow in spots to have areas where they make -- kind of force traffic to slow down. I would recommend they go this -- that direction. For this application I -- I can't see their requesting denial has basis on the drive-through itself. So, I -- I would stand in favor of the application. Seal: Thank you, Commissioner Yearsley. Anybody else want to throw out their -- their thoughts? Grace: Mr. Chairman, yeah, I -- I tend to agree with Commissioner--what Commissioner Yearsley indicated. I -- as a resident pretty close to that area I'm very sympathetic. I -- I deal with the Rocky Mountain traffic in my -- in my neighborhood and subdivision routinely and the drivers are young and inexperienced. So, I am sympathetic. But I -- I'm also mindful of what is before us and I can't help but think also that I'm -- I'm having a hard time coming up with any other commercial establishment that would be in that location Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission December 15,2022 Page 15 of 20 that might not cause or yield the same results, so -- for the neighborhood. So, that's all have to say. Seal: Thank you. Commissioner Lorcher, do you have anything to add? Lorcher: No. Seal: Okay. Yeah. Similarly I'm the same place, but sympathize for the situation, but, again, for the most part by the time it gets here, if ACHD has given the report that all is well, that limits what we can do with an application like this. So, especially, where it's a conditional use permit. I mean -- the property is already in the city and -- and has been, so -- I do want to say I do appreciate some things that staff has put in there as far as the recommendations that were made and, then, the applicant's proposal for the -- essentially the pedestrian traffic. So, I live in this area myself. I'm a frequent bike rider, as are my kids. My wife. So, we ride to this area for, you know, recreation and dining. So, it's nice to have that kind of as an element to -- to the building that's there and to the establishments. So, I also do -- ironically, I live in a subdivision where I have just the opposite problem with traffic. So, I live by a golf course and so we have a lot more people going to that golf course and we have a similar problem where we are seeing just the influx of people causing enough of a rise in there that is causing a lot more traffic in our subdivision. So, unfortunately, it exists everywhere. You are not alone in that. And with that I would be more than happy to hear a motion. Grace: Mr. Chairman, after considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to approve File No. H-2022-0081 as presented in the staff report, including all staff recommendations for the hearing date of December 15th, 2022. Lorcher: Second. Seal: Quick question. Bill, is that enough to cover the condition --or, Stacy, is that enough to -- enough to -- I'm going to be able to talk eventually. The 8A-2C? Hersh: We just need you to state a motion that you are accepting -- or approving the revised change that staff recommended. Grace: Oh. Okay. Hersh: We can pull up the slide. Seal: Yeah. The revision was to 8A-2C, if you want to amend your -- your motion. Grace: So, I'm not -- I guess I'm not following, Mr. Chairman. What's the revision to the motion then? Seal: It's on the screen. I would read it, but that would be redundant. Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission December 15,2022 Page 16 of 20 Grace: So, you just want me to read this? Seal: You can or summarize it if you would like. Parsons: Yeah. Commissioner Grace, you can just say revise the condition A2.0 as -- as stated in -- in tonight's presentation and we will make sure it happens. Grace: Okay. So, Mr. -- Mr. Chairman, I would make the same motion I made -- if I have to make it again I can, but the same motion I made, which also would include recommending a revised condition to Section 8A-2C as is included in the staff report. Seal: Does the second stand? Lorcher: Yes. Seal: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to approve File No. H-2022-0081 with the mentioned modifications. All in favor, please, say aye. All --all in favor, so motion passes. Thank you very much. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. 6. Public Hearing for KeyBank Meridian Branch (H-2022-0076) by HSB Architects + Engineers, located at 3513 W. Chinden Blvd. A. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a drive-through establishment within 300 feet of another drive-through establishment, an existing residence and residential zoning district on 1.04 acres of land in the C-G zoning district. Seal: Okay. All right. And with that we will open the public hearing for Item No. H-2022- 0076 for KeyBank Meridian Branch and we will begin with the staff report. Parsons: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. The last item on the agenda this evening is the KeyBank Meridian Branch conditional use permit. The subject property consists of 1.04 acres of land, currently zoned C-G and it's located at 3485 West Chinden Boulevard, which is the Lost Rapids Subdivision. History on this site -- recently City Council just approved a short plat for this property. So, the lot that you see here in this graphic isn't the actual configuration of the property. The applicant will be required to record that short plat and create the lot that this particular development will develop on I should say. So, here -- you can see here on this graphic on the left-hand side you can see where the short plat created two lots. So, KeyBank is going on the left lot -- one of the lots and, then, this is an additional lot that will be created as part of that short plat process and it will come in with a different user at some point in the future. Don't know what that is at this time. Just doing some quick math in my head before the hearing, I think this is the seventh or eighth drive-through on this particular property, just to bring that to your attention. Typically we -- you know, as you know with the pandemic drive- Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission December 15,2022 Page 17 of 20 throughs have become very popular and so this is one of those instances where we are getting quite a few drive-throughs on the site. So, as -- back in 2019, 1 believe, the Comprehensive Plan designation for this property was changed to commercial to allow for the development of the Costco Lost Rapids property and so, again, this is one of the commercial lots as well. So, the applicant is here tonight -- or at least online tonight to discuss with you developing a 3,400 square foot bank branch on the site, with the associated drive-through. The reason for the drive-through is because, one, this drive- through is located within 300 feet of an existing drive-through and also located within 300 feet of a residential zoning district to the west. So, they are hitting all the right items to require this body to act on this application tonight. I would let you know that this branch will serve the area. So, there is another bank branch that was approved and constructed and operating just to the east of the site as well, but it's, again, a different financial institution. If you had a chance to look at the staff report, you -- you would note that staff did mention that this is required to comply with all UDC standards for drive-through uses, self -- trying to think of -- the ATM. There is an ATM as well, which is self-service uses. That's UDC 11-3A-16. So, visibility needs to be part of that and that would be located on the west side here. One of the interesting things about this particular site is when the short plat was approved recently we did place a condition on the project that access would be from the south and the reason for that -- the reason why we did restrict access, one, Chinden, we don't allow direct lot access to Chinden. But, two, this driveway here is a direct connection to Chinden and we wanted to minimize conflict with residents -- or cars coming off of Chinden and entering the site. So, we had placed that condition to have the shared access come in off the south boundary. Also mention to you as part of the subdivision approval, this development does have cross-access between all the lots within the commercial development. Code does require specific parking standards for this use. The site plan this evening shows 16 parking spaces, which is in excess of the code requirements. Applicant also submitted a concurrent development -- excuse me -- a concurrent design review application with this project. As you know design review applications are reviewed at staff level and -- and approved by the director and so the design that I'm showing you tonight has been approved by staff and so there is no action for you on that this evening. Looking at the public record I did not see that any public testimony was provided on this application. I would mention to you that we did receive written testimony from the architect, the applicant, and I wanted to also let the Commission know that as of 5:00 o'clock this evening I did receive an e-mail from Public Works. There was a condition of approval that I need to have you strike this evening and that would be Public Works site specific condition number four. It refers to reimbursement for the street lights along Chinden. That has already been taken care of or paid by Costco when the development was approved. So, that condition is no longer necessary as part of the project. So, staff is recommending with the conditions in the staff report and with the recommendation that you strike that Public Works condition. With that I will conclude my presentation and stand for any questions you may have. Seal: Thank you very much, Bill. It looks like the applicant is online. Ben, if you want to go ahead and unmute, the floor is yours. Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission December 15,2022 Page 18 of 20 Gingrich: Good evening. Ben Gingrich. I'm with HSB Architects and Engineers representing KeyBank. My address is 1250 Old River Road, Cleveland, Ohio. I don't have much to add, other than the report that was just given by -- by staff here. Our new bank branch is -- is, obviously, going to serve the community. We have put together a nice design here, which we think really emphasizes, you know, sort of pedestrian scale here with these canopies. We are here tonight to go for conditional use on the drive- through. I would try to differentiate ourselves as a bank branch. We are a little different than, you know, similar drive-through uses of restaurant use. As a bank branch we typically see around, you know, maximum four stacking spaces going into a drive- through. The ATM is the -- is the lane adjacent to the building and that's a 24 hour use there and, then, our auto teller lane is the next lane and that has become really crucial, especially during this sort of pandemic time when people don't want to get out of their car, they want to be able to take care of any kind of bank transactions, speak with a -- a member of staff directly from their car. So, you know, I think that the use is appropriate for this district and appropriate for this parcel here out in front of Costco and with that we -- we responded to all the staff comments. The only thing we were -- we were going to look for alternative compliance on was the east property line. The -- the comment was that we needed a five foot landscape buffer. We are going to request alternative compliance to utilize the same five foot buffer as our -- our neighboring property. It's our -- our-- our civil engineer's belief that that -- that meets the standard. We will file any kind of easement that's required to reciprocally maintain that landscape buffer. So, there would be a five foot buffer between our lot and the next lot and we will apply for that through the alternative compliance path concurrent to the CZC. With that I will -- I think that's all my comments. Pretty straightforward and -- and we are looking for your support this evening. Thank you. Seal: Thanks very much, Ben. Appreciate it. Since there is nobody else online, sir, would you like to -- there is one person in Chambers. Would you like to testify on this? No? Okay. With that--oh. I was going to say, Commissioners, do we have any questions for the applicant or staff? Yearsley: I don't. Seal: Okay. That's a no. If there is anything further that the applicant would like to add, otherwise, we will close the public testimony portion. Gingrich: Thank you all of your time this evening. Seal: All right. Thank you very much. Okay. At this time I will take a motion to close the public hearing for File No. H-2022-0076. Lorcher: So moved. Grace: Second. Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission December 15,2022 Page 19 of 20 Seal: It's been moved and seconded to close File No. H-2022-0076. All in favor, please, say aye. None opposed. Public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Seal: This one seems to be pretty straightforward, but if anybody has any questions, concerns or comments, Please, feel free. Or a motion. Grace: Mr. Chairman, just a clarification. So, any -- Seal: Commissioner Grace, go ahead. Grace: -- motion that was -- would be made would be to -- I can't talk either. Any motion would need to include the removal of the fourth Commission condition from Public Works related to the reimbursement agreement; is that accurate? Seal: Yes. I mean specifically it was strike the site specific condition number four is what I heard. Grace: Okay. Lorcher: You can go. Grace: Mr. Chairman, I will give it a shot then. Seal: Go right ahead. Grace: After considering all staff, application, and public testimony, I move to approve File No. H-2022-0076 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of December 15th, 2022, with the following modification. Striking the fourth site specific condition under the Public Works related to the reimbursement agreement. Lorcher: Second. Seal: It's been moved and seconded to approve File No. H-2022-0076 for the KeyBank -- KeyBank Meridian Branch with the modifications noted. All those in favor, please, say aye. None opposed. Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Lorcher: Mr. Chair? Seal: Commissioner Lorcher, go right ahead. Lorcher: I move we adjourn. Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission December 15,2022 Page 20 of 20 Seal: Do I have a second? Yearsley: Second. Seal: It's been moved and seconded that we adjourn. All in favor, please, say aye. None opposed. We are adjourned. Thank you all very much. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:08 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS.) APPROVED ANDREW SEAL - CHAIRMAN 1-5-2023 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 1-5-2023 AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC:Approve Minutes of the December 1, 2022 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission December 1, 2022 Page 35 of 35 Seal: It's been moved and seconded to adjourn. All in favor say aye. Thank you. We are adjourned. Thanks. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:51 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS.) APPROVED _____________________________________ _____|_____|_____ ANDREW SEAL - CHAIRMAN DATE APPROVED ATTEST: _____________________________________ CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK    E K IDIAN:--- iuAn Planning and Zoning Presentations and outline Changes to Agenda:  Item #2: Dutch Bros Ustick and Eagle (H-2022-0077) - Application requires continuance due to a noticing error by the th Applicant. Staff recommends the hearing of January 5. th  Item #3: Promenade Cottages (H-2022-0013) – Applicant requests continuance to the January 19 to allow the applicant more time to provide staff with additional documentation.  Item #4: Meridian Oz Apartments (H-2022-0073) – Applicant requests a continuance to a later date in January in order th to work with Staff on revisions to the development plan – Staff recommends Jan. 19. Item #5: Guthries Drive-Through (H-2022-0081) Application(s): Conditional Use Permit Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 0.969 acres of land, zoned C-C, located at 1840 W. Chinden Blvd. History: In 2015, the Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit (CUP-15-007) for Carl’s Jr. that has since expired. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Mixed Use – Community (MU-C) Summary of Request: A restaurant is a principally permitted use in the C-C zoning district; a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is required for a drive-through establishment within 300 feet of another drive-through facility, residential district, and existing residence. The Applicant proposes to construct a 2,083-square-foot restaurant with a drive-through for a Guthries which will contribute to the mix of uses in this area and provide another fast food option to area residents within close proximity to nearby residential development. There are specific use standards in the UDC that apply to both the restaurant & the drive-through use. Parking is required for restaurant uses at 1 space per 250 s.f. of gross floor area. A minimum of 8 spaces are required; a total of 25 spaces are proposed, exceeding the UDC minimums. Access is provided from the shared access with the adjacent property to the east proposed from a driveway along the northern boundary of the site off of W. Island Green Drive and from the private drive located on the west side of the property. Direct access via Chinden Blvd. is prohibited. A drive-through use requires the applicant to demonstrate safe pedestrian and vehicular access/circulation on-site AND between adjacent properties. Safe pedestrian access should be provided from the vehicle stacking areas around the drive-through on the site - one is required from the perimeter sidewalk along Chinden to the main building entrance. Staff recommends additional pedestrian accesses to the building along the south side of the drive aisle per UDC 11-3A-19B.4 and a striped pedestrian walkway on the northeast side of the site directing patrons to the building entrance (see proposed redlines on the site plan). Staff recommends signage be installed ahead of each crossing warning drivers to watch out for pedestrians. Staff finds that the parking stalls to the north should be restricted for employee parking only to maximize pedestrian safety. The Applicant has submitted a revised site plan that demonstrates better pedestrian circulation for the site that differs from Staff’s original recommendation. Staff supports the changes as proposed by the Applicant and Staff recommends a modification to condition Section VIII A – Planning (2)c. in the Staff report to reflect the pedestrian walkway changes (see slide). The site plan shows the stacking lane is a separate lane from the drive aisles and parking which provides access to the rest of the development. The proposed site layout places a drive-through that starts at the northeast corner of the building and goes all the way around the building with the exits shown at the northeast corner and west side of the building and also shows the pick-up window on the west side of the proposed restaurant. Street buffer landscaping was installed within the street buffer along W. Chinden Boulevard with the Chinden and Linder Crossing subdivision improvements and must remain protected during construction on the site in accord with UDC 11-3B-10C3. Conceptual building elevations were submitted for a single-story building that incorporates a mix of materials consisting of EIFS, brick veneer, metal awnings, metal coping/downspouts, windows, and metal roofing. The final design of the structure is required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. Written Testimony: A petition signed by numerous neighbors that live within the Spruwing/Spurwing Challenge Subdivisions is included as part of the Public Record under Public Comments. The primary concern is with excess traffic another restaurant with a drive-through will bring to the neighborhood. Staff Recommendation: Approval with the conditions listed in the Staff Report and with the modification as requested by the Applicant. Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2022-0081, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of December 15, 2022, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2022-0081, as presented during the hearing on H-2022-0081, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2022-0081 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance) Item #6: KeyBank Meridian Branch (H-2022-0076) Application(s): Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 1.04 acres of land, zoned C-G, located at 3485 W. Chinden Blvd. History: This property was annexed with the requirement of a Development Agreement in 2018 with the Lost Rapids subdivision. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Commercial Summary of Request: Conditional Use Permit for a drive-through establishment for a 3,400 s.f. financial institution (KeyBank Meridian Branch) within 300-feet of another drive-through establishment, an existing residence and residential zoning district, on 1.04-acres of land in the C-G zoning district. The branch will serve the community with banking offices for client consultation, a drive-through ATM and a drive-through auto-teller lane. The proposed development is subject to the specific use standards listed in the UDC for financial institutions & drive-through establishments. Access is proposed via the east/west driveway along the southern boundary of the site; direct lot access via Chinden Blvd. and the north/south driveway along the western boundary of the site is prohibited. A reciprocal cross-access easement exists between all lots in the subdivision as noted on the Lost Rapids subdivision plat. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with UDC which requires a minimum of 6 spaces. A total of 16 spaces are proposed, exceeding UDC standards. Detailed building elevations were submitted for a single-story building that incorporates a Dryvit outsulation MD system in a variety of finishes, including EIFS, wood panel, red panel and stone, and glazing on the storefront. Aluminum sunshades are proposed over the windows. A flat roof with parapets of varying heights is proposed. The proposed design complies with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual and the Design Review application was approved. Written Testimony: Ben Gingrich, HSB Architecture (Applicant’s Response to staff report) Staff Recommendation: Approval w/conditions in the staff report Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2022-0076, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of December 15, 2022, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2022-0076, as presented during the hearing on December 15, 2022, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2022-0076 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance) Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting December 15, 2022 Item #5: FUTURE LAND USE MAPZONING MAP Conditional Use Permit–Through -DriveGuthries Site Plan Landscape Plan Pedestrian Walkways Applicant’s Revised Proposed ChangesStaff’s Proposed Pedestrian Walkways Elevations Revise Condition Section VIII. A(2).c in the Staff Report entrance(s) may be striped.pedestrian walkways to the main building proposed required19B.4b.; the two additional -3A-in UDC 11pavers, colored or scored concrete, or bricks as set forth from the vehicular driving surface through the use of to the main building entrance shall be distinguished site the private drive on the southwest of the Chindenalong The pedestrian walkway from the perimeter sidewalk  Item #6: KeyBank Meridian Branch AERIAL MAPZONING MAPFUTURE LAND USE MAP Conditional Use Permit– LegendLegend \[\[ Project LocationProject Location Low Density Residential CHINDENCHINDEN Commercial TEN MILETEN MILE Medium Civic Density Residential MU-C Site PlanLandscape Plan Building Elevations AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC:Public Hearing for Guthries Drive-Through (H-2022-0081) by Nicolette Womack, Kimley-Horn, located at 1840 W. Chinden Blvd., near the northwest corner of N. Linder Rd. and W. Chinden Blvd. Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2022-0081 ͘ZĞƋƵĞƐƚ͗ŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůhƐĞWĞƌŵŝƚĨŽƌĂŶĞǁĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞϮ͕ϬϴϯƐƋƵĂƌĞĨŽŽƚƋƵŝĐŬƐĞƌǀĞ restaurant with a drive-through located within 300 feet of an existing drive-through. PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: December 15, 2022 ITEM # ON AGENDA: 5 PROJECT NAME: Guthries Drive-Through (H-2022-0081) Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing I wish to testify (Please Print) HOA? (mark X if yes) If yes, please provide HOA name _K(0 2 '/'Tes�-"� f-vokmaier 2101 36 tok� '&, 6;Vj �i Ok MO-Al PC L'�X'P'� 61" _111io 5 i 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Page 1 HEARING DATE: 12/15/2022 TO:Planning & Zoning Commission FROM:Stacy Hersh, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 SUBJECT:H-2022-0081 Guthries – CUP LOCATION:1840 W. Chinden Blvd, near the northwest corner of N. Linder Road and W. Chinden Blvd. in the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 23, Township 4N, Range 1W. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a drive-through establishment within 300 feet of another drive- through facility, residential district, and existing residence on 0.969 acres of land in the C-C zoning district. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Description Details Page Acreage 0..969-acre Future Land Use Designation Commercial Existing Land Use Vacant/undeveloped land Proposed Land Use(s)Restaurant with a drive-through Current Zoning Community Business District (C-C) Physical Features (waterways, hazards, flood plain, hillside) NA Neighborhood meeting date; # of attendees: 10/3/2022 History (previous approvals)PP-14-011 (Chinden and Linder Crossing Subdivision); MDA-14-008, Development Agreement Instr. #2014- 088001 (Chinden and Linder Crossing Subdivision); FP- 14-041 (Chinden and Linder Crossing Subdivision)CUP- 15-007(Carl’s Jr expired). Page 2 A. Project Area Maps III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Nicolette Womack – 950 W. Bannock Street, Suite 1100 B. Owner: DG Boise Chinden, LLC – 1000 Johnson Ferry Road B250, Marietta, GA 30068 Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Planned Development Map Page 3 C. Representative: Same as Applicant IV. NOTICING Planning & Zoning Posting Date Newspaper Notification 11/30/2022 Radius notification mailed to properties within 300 feet 11/13/2022 Site Posting Date 12/3/2022 Next Door posting 11/28/2022 V. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan: COMMERCIAL LAND USES This property is designated “Mixed Use – Community” on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. The purpose of this designation is to allocate areas where community-serving uses and dwellings are integrated into the urban fabric. The intent is to integrate a variety of uses, including residential, and to avoid mainly single-use and strip commercial-type buildings. Non-residential buildings in these areas tend to be larger than in Mixed Use – Neighborhood areas, but not as large as in Mixed Use – Regional areas. Goods and services in these areas tend to be of the variety that people will mainly travel by car to, but also walk or bike to (up to 3 or 4 miles). Employment opportunities for those living in and around the neighborhood are encouraged. The site is proposed to develop a drive-through restaurant which will contribute to the mix of uses in this area and provide another fast food option to area residents within close proximity to nearby residential developments. The proposed use will also provide employment opportunities to nearby residents. Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this property and apply to the proposed use (staff analysis in italics): x “Require all new and reconstructed parking lots to provide landscaping in internal islands and along streets.” (2.01.04B) All parking lot landscaping is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B- 8C. x “Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is contiguous to the City.” (3.01.01F) City water and sewer service stubs have been provided to this site with the development of the subdivision. Page 4 x “Plan for a variety of commercial and retail opportunities within the Area of City Impact.” (3.05.01J) The proposed drive-through restaurant will contribute to the variety of uses and fast food options in the northern portion of the City. x “Require all commercial and industrial businesses to install and maintain landscaping.” (2.01.03B) Street buffer landscaping was installed with the subdivision along W. Island Green Dr. and N. Linder Rd. on this site in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. Internal parking lot landscaping is required to be installed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C. x “Locate industrial and commercial uses where adequate water supply and water pressure are available for fire protection.” (3.04.02A) There is adequate water supply and pressure available to the site for fire protection. For the above-stated reasons, staff believes the proposed use is consistent with the applicable comprehensive plan policies and is appropriate in this location. SITE DESIGN AND CODE ANALYSIS The Applicant proposes to construct a 2,083 (s.f.) restaurant with a drive-through for Guthries on a 0.969-acre property in the C-C zoning district. A restaurant is listed as a principal permitted use in the C-G zoning district per UDC Table 11-2B-2, subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-49. A drive-through requires approval of a conditional use permit when it’s within 300 feet of another drive-through facility, an existing residence or a residential district per 11-4-3-11A.1. In this case, one other drive-through establishment exists within 300 feet of the property – Zions Bank (H-2018-0077) on a lot to the east; there are also existing residences and residential districts within 300 feet of the property. The proposed hours of operation will be Sunday – Thursday from 10:00 am to 9:00 pm, and Friday and Saturday from 10:00 am to 10:00 pm. Business hours of operation within the C-C District shall be limited from 6:00 am to 11:00 pm when the property abuts a residential use or district. The property does not directly abut a residential district; however, it is within 300 feet of existing residential uses (north); therefore, Staff is supportive of the proposed hours of operation. The proposed use and development plan is in substantial conformance with the provisions in the existing Development Agreement (Inst. #2014-088001). Specific Use Standards: Staff’s analysis is in italics. Drive-Through Establishment: The proposed drive-through establishment is subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-11, Drive-Through Establishment. All establishments providing drive-through service are required to identify the stacking lane, menu and speaker location (if applicable), and window location on the site plan. A menu board, speaker, and window location are depicted on the site plan at the proposed ordering point. The site plan is also required to demonstrate safe pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation on the site and between adjacent properties. Safe pedestrian access should be provided from the vehicle stacking areas on the south sides of the drive-through and along the northeast side of the site – one is required from the perimeter sidewalk along Chinden to the main building entrance. Staff recommends additional pedestrian accesses to the building along the southeast drive aisle per UDC 11-3A-19B.4 and a striped pedestrian walkway on the northeast side of the site directing patrons to the building entrance (see proposed Page 5 redlines on the site plan). Staff recommends signage be installed ahead of each crossing warning drivers to watch out for pedestrians (west, northeast, south). Staff finds that the parking stalls to the north should be restricted for employee parking only to maximize pedestrian safety. At a minimum, the plan is required to demonstrate compliance with the following standards: 1) Stacking lanes have sufficient capacity to prevent obstruction of driveways, drive aisles and the public right-of-way by patrons; The concept plan shows the stacking lane is a separate lane from the drive aisles and parking which provides access to the rest of the development. The proposed site layout places a drive-through that starts at the northeast corner of the building and goes all the way around the building with the exits shown at the northeast corner and west side of the building and also shows the pick-up window on the west side of the proposed restaurant. If there was additional or excessive overflow from the drive- through lane which does sometimes occur from drive-through establishments at peak times, it may stack into the parking lot to the east, north, and then west, not into W. Chinden Boulevard. 2) The stacking lane shall be a separate lane from the circulation lanes needed for access and parking, except stacking lanes may provide access to designated employee parking. The stacking lane is a separate lane from the circulation lanes needed for access and parking, however there is a potential for vehicles to stack in the southern drive aisle. 3) The stacking lane shall not be located within ten (10) feet of any residential district or existing residence; The stacking lane is not located within 10’ of any residential district or residence. 4) Any stacking lane greater than one hundred (100) feet in length shall provide for an escape lane; and The stacking lane exceeds 100’ in length and an escape lane is required. An escape lane is proposed prior to approaching the ordering window on the west and east sides of the building. 5) The site should be designed so that the drive-through is visible from a public street for surveillance purposes. The drive-through is located on the east west side of the building and is visible from the private drive on the west and from W. Island Green Drive along the north side of the property boundary for surveillance purposes. Based on the above analysis, Staff deems the proposed drive-through is in compliance with the specific use standards as required. Restaurant: The proposed use is also subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-49 Restaurant, which requires at a minimum, one (1) parking space to be provided for every 250 square feet of gross floor area (see parking analysis below). Dimensional Standards: Future development should be consistent with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the C-C zoning district. Access: Access is provided to this site via W. Island Green Dr., a local street and the private drive located on the west side of the property. A cross-access easement exists between all lots in this subdivision as depicted on the plat for Chinden and Linder Crossing Subdivision. Direct access via W. Chinden Boulevard is prohibited. At the time of the future Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) application, the applicant should provide written documentation of the recorded cross- access easement. Parking: A minimum of one (1) parking space is required to be provided for every 250 square feet of Page 6 gross floor area for the proposed restaurant use. A minimum of 8 off-street vehicle parking spaces are required for the 2,083 square foot building; the submitted site plan shows 25 proposed parking spaces exceeding UDC minimums. Due to the multiple entrances/exits provided on this site for parking and drive-through access, Staff recommends that the Applicant depict striping and visible signage noting the required traffic flow for the site. A minimum one (1) bicycle parking space is required to be provided for every 25 vehicle spaces or portion thereof per UDC 11-3C-6G; bicycle parking facilities are required to comply with the location and design standards listed in UDC 11-3C-5C. Bicycle parking is not shown on the plans submitted with this application. Pedestrian Walkways: A pedestrian walkway is proposed from the sidewalk along the private road to the main building entrance as required by UDC 11-3A-19.B.4. The proposed pedestrian connection is required to be a minimum of five (5) feet in width. Where pedestrian walkways cross vehicular driving surfaces, they’re required to be distinguished from the vehicular driving surface through the use of pavers, colored or scored concrete, or bricks as set forth in UDC 11- 3A-19B.4. The site/landscape plan submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application should reflect compliance with this standard – the proposed striping of the crosswalk is not allowed and should be revised to comply with this standard. Landscaping: Street buffer landscaping was installed within the street buffer along W. Chinden Boulevard with the Chinden and Linder Crossing subdivision improvements and must remain protected during construction on the site in accord with UDC 11-3B-10C3. Parking lot landscaping: Parking lot landscaping is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C. Mechanical Equipment: All mechanical equipment on the back of the building and outdoor service and equipment should be incorporated into the overall design of buildings and landscaping so that the visual and acoustic impacts of these functions are fully contained and out of view from adjacent properties and public streets as set forth in UDC 11-3A-12. If mechanical equipment is proposed to be roof-mount, all equipment should be screened and out of view as noted above. Building Elevations: Conceptual building elevations were submitted as shown in Section VII.C for a single-story building that incorporates a mix of materials consisting of EIFS, brick veneer, metal awnings, metal coping/downspouts, windows, and metal roofing. The final design of the structure is required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. No elevations were submitted that show the proposed trash enclosure; this should be corrected with the future CZC submittal and should match the style of the proposed building. The submitted landscape plans do show adequate screening of the trash enclosure. Certificate of Zoning Compliance & Design Review: A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted for the proposed use prior to submittal of a building permit application to ensure consistency with the conditions in Section VIII, UDC standards and design standards. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed conditional use permit with the conditions included in Section VIII per the Findings in Section IX. Page 7 VII. EXHIBITS A. Proposed Site Plan (dated: 10/10/2022) Page 8 B. Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 10/18/2022) Page 9 C. Building Elevations Page 10 VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING 1. Future development of this site shall comply with the previous conditions of approval and terms of the existing Development Agreement and the conditions contained herein [); MDA- 14-008, Development Agreement Instr. #2014-088001 (Chinden and Linder Crossing Subdivision) PP-14-011 (Chinden and Linder Crossing Subdivision); FP-14-041 (Chinden and Linder Crossing Subdivision)]. 2. The site plan and landscape plan submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application shall be revised as follows: a. The stacking lane, menu and speaker location(s), and window location shall be depicted in accord with UDC 11-4-3-11B. b. All mechanical equipment on the back of the building and outdoor service and equipment areas should be incorporated into the overall design of buildings and landscaping so that the visual and acoustic impacts of these functions are fully contained and out of view from adjacent properties and public streets as set forth in UDC 11-3A-12. c. The pedestrian walkway from the perimeter sidewalk along Chinden to the main building entrance shall be distinguished from the vehicular driving surface through the use of pavers, colored or scored concrete, or bricks as set forth in UDC 11-3A-19B.4b.; the two additional required pedestrian walkways to the main building entrance(s) may be striped. d. Depict signage ahead of each pedestrian crossing(s) in the drive-through lane (south and northeast) notifying drivers to watch out for pedestrians. e. Depict signage along the parking stalls to the north restricting the stalls for employee parking only to maximize pedestrian safety. f. Additional signage and parking lot striping is required throughout the site to efficiently and adequately direct patrons to the menu boards and throughout the site with minimal conflict. g. Depict landscaping in the perimeter buffer and within the parking area in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C. h. Depict signage ahead of each pedestrian crossing(s) in the drive-through lane (south and northeast) notifying drivers to watch out for pedestrians. i. Depict one bicycle rack as close to the building entrance as possible without obstructing pedestrian walkways, public sidewalks, or building entrance(s) in accord with UDC 11-5- 3C-5 and UDC 11-3C-6G. 3. Compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-11– Drive-Through Establishment and 11-4-3-49 – Restaurant is required. 4. Street buffer landscaping was installed within the street buffer along W. Chinden Boulevard with the Chinden and Linder Crossing subdivision improvements and must remain protected during construction on the site in accord with UDC 11-3B-10C3. 5. Submit elevation of the trash enclosure that generally matches the proposed building design with the submittal of the CZC and DES application. 6. Business hours of operation within the C-C District shall be limited from 6:00 am to 11:00 pm when the property abuts a residential use or district Page 11 7. Direct access via W. Chinden Boulevard is prohibited. At the time of the future Certificate of Zoning Compliance CZC) application, the applicant should provide written documentation of the recorded cross-access easement. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application shall be submitted and approved for the proposed use prior to submittal of a building permit application. The design of the site and structure shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19; the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual and with the Development Agreement. 8. The conditional use permit is valid for a maximum period of two (2) years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time, the Applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground as set forth in UDC 11-5B-6. A time extension may be requested as set forth in UDC 11-5B-6F. B. PUBLIC WORKS Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. A future install agreement will be required for the development of this property. This agreement will be for $14,000.00 for the cost of one streetlight to be installed after the final building out Chinden Blvd. General Conditions of Approval 1. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (UDC 11-3B-6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single- point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 3. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42- 1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 4. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer’s Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development, and if so, how they will continue to be used, or provide record of their abandonment. 5. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. 6. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. 7. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 8. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. Page 12 9. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 10. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 11. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 12. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. C. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT (ACHD) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=282199&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ity D. NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=282304&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ity IX. FINDINGS Conditional Use (UDC 11-5B-6) Findings: The commission shall base its determination on the conditional use permit request upon the following: 1. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located. Staff finds the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed development and meet all dimensional and development regulations of the C-C zoning district. 2. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian comprehensive plan and in accord with the requirements of this title. Staff finds the proposed restaurant with a drive-through will be harmonious with the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with applicable UDC standards with the conditions noted in Section VIII of this report. 3. That the design, construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area. Staff finds the design, construction, operation and maintenance of the proposed use will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood, with the existing and intended character of the vicinity and will not adversely change the essential character of the area. 4. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. Staff finds the proposed use will not adversely affect other properties in the vicinity if it complies with the conditions in Section VIII of this report. Page 13 5. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, schools, parks, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer. Staff finds the proposed use will be served by essential public facilities and services as required. 6. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Staff finds the proposed use will not create additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. 7. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. Staff finds the proposed use will not be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by the reasons noted above. 8. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) Staff finds the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of any such features. 9. Additional findings for the alteration or extension of a nonconforming use: a. That the proposed nonconforming use does not encourage or set a precedent for additional nonconforming uses within the area; and, This finding is not applicable. b. That the proposed nonconforming use is developed to a similar or greater level of conformity with the development standards as set forth in this title as compared to the level of development of the surrounding properties. This finding is not applicable. E IDIAN;--- Applicant Presentation Guthrie’s Drive December 15, 2022 CUP-Restaurant Thru - Applicant Team Boise, IdahoHorn-Kimley CONNOR CANDRIAN Boise, IdahoHorn-Kimley LAUREN PITCHER Boise, IdahoHorn-Kimley NICOLETTE WOMACK, AICP SEPT 2022 Timeline P&Z Hearing–DEC 2022 SubmittedApplication –OCT 2022 Meeting–OCT 2022 MeetingApp -Pre– Vicinity Map 1840 W. 0.97 acres•SITE BlvdChinden Future Land Use Map Mixed Use Community– Zoning Map Community Business– Site Plan Updated Site Plan Landscape Plan Conceptual Elevations Staff Report ChindenNo direct access to •Business Hours: 6am to 11pm•Bicycle Rack•Existing and Proposed Landscaping•Signage•Pedestrian Access and Materials•Incorporation/ScreeningMechanical Equipment and Trash Enclosure • Requested Action Approval of the Conditional Use Permit • C E IDIAN�-- Public Presentation(s) https://-/islandwww.suntoursbarbados.com AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC:Public Hearing for KeyBank Meridian Branch (H-2022-0076) by HSB Architects + Engineers, Located at 3513 W. Chinden Blvd. Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2022-0076 ͘Request: Conditional Use Permit for a drive-through establishment within 300 feet of another drive-through establishment, an existing residence and residential zoning district on 1.04 acres of land in the C-G zoning district. PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: December 15, 2022 ITEM # ON AGENDA: 6 PROJECT NAME: KeyBank Meridian Branch (H-2022-0076) Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing I wish to testify (Please Print) HOA? (mark X if yes) If yes, please provide HOA name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Page 1 HEARING DATE: 12/15/2022 TO:Planning & Zoning Commission FROM:Sonya Allen, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 SUBJECT:H-2022-0076 KeyBank Meridian Branch –CUP LOCATION:3485 W. Chinden Blvd., in the NW 1/4 of Section 27, T.4N., R.1W. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Conditional Use Permit for a drive-through establishment for a financial institution within 300-feet of another drive-through establishment, an existing residence and residential zoning district, on 1.04-acres of land in the C-G zoning district. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Description Details Page Acreage 1.04-acre Future Land Use Designation Commercial Existing Land Use Vacant/undeveloped land Proposed Land Use(s)Drive-through for a financial institution Current Zoning General Retail & Service Commercial (C-G) Physical Features (waterways, hazards, flood plain, hillside) NA Neighborhood meeting date; # of attendees: 9/20/22 History (previous approvals)H-2018-0004 (CPAM, AZ, PP, VAR –Lost Rapids); H- 2019-0056 (FP –Lost Rapids); Development Agreement (Inst. #2018-079970 –GFI –Meridian Investments II, LLC); PBA-2022-0015 (Lots 7 & 8, Block 1, Lost Rapids Subdivision);SHP-2022-0014 (Lost Rapids West) Page 2 A. Project Area Maps III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Ben Gingrich, HSB Architects + Engineers – 1250 Old River Rd., Ste. 201, Cleveland, OH 44113 Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Planned Development Map Low Density Residential Civic MU-C Medium Density Residential Commercial CHINDEN TEN MILE[Legend Project Location CHINDEN TEN MILE[Legend Project Location CHINDEN C-CR-4 RUT RUT RUT RUT R-4 R-4 R-4L-O R1 R-8 R-4 R-8 R-8 R-8 C-G L-O R-40 RUT R-15 R-4 R-4 R-2 R-8 RUT C-C R-2R-2 C-G R-15 C-N [Legend Project Location CHINDEN TEN MILE[Legend Project Location City Limits Planned Parcels Page 3 B. Owner: GFI Meridian Investments II, LLC – 74 E. 500 S., Ste. 200, Bountiful, UT 84010 C. Representative: Same as Applicant IV. NOTICING Planning & Zoning Posting Date Newspaper Notification 11/30/2022 Radius notification mailed to properties within 300 feet 11/13/2022 Site Posting Date 11/23/2022 Next Door posting 11/28/2022 V. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan: This property is designated as Commercial on the Future Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan. This designation provides for a full range of commercial uses to serve area residents and visitors. Desired uses may include retail, restaurants, personal and professional services, and office uses, as well as appropriate public and quasi-public uses. Sample zoning include: C-N, C-C, and C-G. The subject property is one of several Commercial designated and C-G zoned properties in Lost Rapids subdivision that is in the development process. The proposed development and use of the site with a financial institution and drive-through is a desired use within the Commercial future lane use map designation in the Comprehensive Plan, as noted above, and with adjacent approved uses in the vicinity. Therefore, Staff finds the proposed project is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as required. Unified Development Code: The Applicant proposes to construct a new 3,400 square foot (s.f.) financial institution (KeyBank Meridian Branch) with a drive-through on 1.04 acres of land in the C-G zoning district. The branch will serve the community with banking offices for client consultation, a drive-through ATM and a drive- through auto-teller lane. Note: The configuration of the property depicted on the maps does not yet reflect the recently approved short plat (SHP-2022-0014) which creates the configuration of the subject property. The short plat needs to be recorded prior to submittal of a building permit application. A financial institution is listed as a principal permitted use in the C-G zoning district per UDC Table 11- 2B-2, subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-17. A drive-through requires approval of a conditional use permit when it’s within 300-feet of another drive-through facility, an existing residence or a residential district per 11-4-3-11A.1. In this case, there is a drive-through establishment [i.e. Dutch Page 4 Bros. Coffee (A-2021-0177)] to the east and a residential district (i.e. R-15) and residential uses to the west in Bainbridge Subdivision No. 12 within 300-feet of the subject property; the next two (2) lots to the east of Dutch Bros. also have drive-through uses. Compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-16 Self-Service Uses for the ATM is required as follows: (Staff’s comments in italics) A. Entrance or view of the self-service facility shall be open to the public street or to adjoining businesses and shall have low impact security lighting. The entrance and view of the ATM is open to the public street (W. Chinden Blvd.) and the driveway along the west boundary of the site. B. Financial transaction areas shall be oriented to and visible from an area that receives a high volume of traffic, such as a collector or arterial street. The financial transaction area of the ATM is oriented toward the adjacent driveway along the west boundary of the site and is visible from the public street (W. Chinden Blvd.) along the north boundary of the site. C. Landscape shrubbery shall be limited to no more than three (3) feet in height between entrances and financial transaction areas and the public street. The reed grass depicted on the landscape plan in the buffer along the west boundary of the site and the falkner boxwood in the buffer along the northern boundary of the site on the west side of the building has a mature height of 4- feet, which is not allowed; the landscape plan should be revised to comply with this standard. The proposed use and development plan is in substantial conformance with the provisions in the existing Development Agreement (Inst. # 2018-079970). Hours of Operation: The branch lobby and auto-teller are open normal business hours Monday thru Saturday; the ATM is operational 27/7. Because the proposed use/property does not abut a residential use or district, a conditional use permit is not required for the ATM. Specific Use Standards: The proposed use is subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3- 11 – Drive-Through Establishment and in 11-4-3-17 – Financial Institution. Staff’s analysis is in italics. Drive-Through Establishment: All establishments providing drive-through service are required to identify the stacking lane, menu and speaker location (if applicable), and window location on the site plan. The stacking lane and window location is depicted on the site plan. The site plan is also required to demonstrate safe pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation on the site and between adjacent properties. A safe pedestrian walkway is proposed from the perimeter sidewalk along the southern boundary of the site to the main building entrance in compliance with UDC 11-3A-19B.4a. The sidewalk along the southern boundary of the site continues to the east for pedestrian access between adjacent properties. Vehicular access is proposed from the drive aisle along the southern boundary of the site and safe vehicular circulation within the site is also proposed. At a minimum, the plan is required to demonstrate compliance with the following standards: 1) Stacking lanes have sufficient capacity to prevent obstruction of driveways, drive aisles and the public right-of-way by patrons; The proposed stacking lanes appear to have sufficient capacity to prevent obstruction of drive aisles. 2) The stacking lane shall be a separate lane from the circulation lanes needed for access and parking, except stacking lanes may provide access to designated employee parking. The stacking lane is a separate lane from the circulation lanes needed for access and parking. Page 5 3) The stacking lane shall not be located within ten (10) feet of any residential district or existing residence; The stacking lane is not located within 10’ of any residential district or residence. 4) Any stacking lane greater than one hundred (100) feet in length shall provide for an escape lane; and An escape lane is proposed as shown on the site plan. 5) The site should be designed so that the drive-through is visible from a public street for surveillance purposes. The drive-through is located on the west side of the building and is visible from W. Chinden Blvd. and from the driveway to/from Chinden along the west side of the property for surveillance purposes. Financial Institution: A. The location, access and safety features of all automated teller machines (ATMs) shall be subject to review and approval by the Meridian Police Department, and in accord with the standards set forth in section 11-3A-16 of this title. The Applicant should obtain approval from the Police Dept. for the proposed ATM. See above analysis for compliance with the standards in UDC 11- 3A-16. B. All ATMs shall be deemed an accessory use to a financial institution. C. All approaches and entrances to ATMs should be highly visible and adequately lit so that people cannot loiter, or enter, without being seen. The addition of security cameras are highly recommended. The Applicant shall comply with this standard. Dimensional Standards: Future development should be consistent with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the C-G zoning district. Access: Access is proposed via the east/west driveway along the southern boundary of the site; direct lot access via Chinden Blvd. and the north/south driveway along the western boundary of the site is prohibited. A reciprocal cross-access easement exists between all lots in the subdivision as noted on the Lost Rapids subdivision plat. Parking: Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11- 3A-6B.1. Based on a 3,400 square foot structure, a minimum of six (6) spaces are required. A total of 16 spaces are proposed, exceeding UDC standards. A minimum of one (1) bicycle parking space is required to be provided for every 25 vehicle spaces or portion thereof per UDC 11-3C-6G; bicycle parking facilities are required to comply with the location and design standards listed in UDC 11-3C-5C. A bicycle rack is proposed on the south side of the building in accord with this standard. The site design requires vehicles that are parked on the east side of the building to exit the site through the drive-through escape lane and vehicles accessing the parking spaces on the south side of the building to travel against traffic leaving the drive-through. Staff is concerned about traffic conflicts within the site that may exist because of the site design, as discussed with the applicant in the pre-application meeting. The Applicant did not share Staff’s concerns and proceeded with the proposed site layout. The Applicant should obtain approval from Republic Services for the location of the trash enclosure prior to submittal of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. Page 6 Landscaping: Street buffer landscaping was installed within the street buffer along W. Chinden Blvd. with the Lost Rapids subdivision improvements. Parking lot landscaping is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C. A minimum 5-foot wide perimeter buffer is required along the east boundary of the site per UDC 11-3B-8C.1, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C.1b. The buffer on the adjacent property to the east does not meet this requirement; remove from the plan. Sidewalks: A 10-foot wide multi-use pathway exists within a public use easement in the street buffer on the northern portion of this site along W. Chinden Blvd. A sidewalk exists within the landscape buffers along the western and southern boundaries of the site along internal driveways within Lost Rapids Subdivision. A pedestrian walkway is proposed from the perimeter sidewalk along the southern boundary of the site to the main building entrance in accord with UDC 11-3A-19.B.4. Where the walkway crosses the vehicular driving surface, it’s required to be distinguished from the vehicular driving surface through the use of pavers, colored or scored concrete, or bricks as set forth in UDC 11-3A-19B.4. The site/landscape plan submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application should reflect compliance with this standard – the proposed striping on the pathway from the perimeter sidewalk to the main building entrance is not approved. The sidewalk on the south and east sides of the building where parking abuts should be widened to 7-feet to allow vehicles to overhang 2-feet (the length of stalls may be reduced to 17-feet); or, wheel stops should be provided within parking spaces to prevent vehicle overhang in accord with UDC 11-3C-5B.3, 4. Easements: There are existing easements on this lot as shown on the Lost Rapids subdivision plat. The proposed structure shall not encroach within these easements, except as allowed in the UDC. Mechanical Equipment: All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened as viewed from the farthest edge of the adjoining right-of-way. The Applicant states rooftop screens are provided for all HVAC equipment. The Applicant also states no ground level mechanical equipment is proposed. Building Elevations: Detailed building elevations were submitted as shown in Section VII.C for a single-story building that incorporates a Dryvit outsulation MD system in a variety of finishes, including EIFS, wood panel, red panel and stone, and glazing on the storefront. Aluminum sunshades are proposed over the windows. A flat roof with parapets of varying heights is proposed. The proposed design complies with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual and the Design Review application is approved. Certificate of Zoning Compliance: A Certificate of Zoning Compliance application is required to be submitted for the proposed use prior to submittal of a building permit application to ensure consistency with the conditions in Section VIII and UDC standards. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed conditional use permit with the conditions included in Section VIII per the Findings in Section IX. The Director approved the Design Review application. Page 7 VII. EXHIBITS A. Proposed Site Plan (dated: 4/20/2022) Page 8 B. Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 9/20/22) Page 9 C. Building Elevations Page 10 Page 11 VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING 1. Future development of this site shall comply with the previous conditions of approval and terms of the existing Development Agreement and the conditions contained herein [H-2018-0004 (CPAM, AZ, PP, VAR – Lost Rapids); Development Agreement (Inst. #2018-079970 – GFI – Meridian Investments II, LLC); H-2019-0056 (FP – Lost Rapids); SHP-2022-0014 (Lost Rapids West)].! 2. The site plan and landscape plan submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application shall be revised as follows: a. All mechanical equipment on the back of the building and outdoor service and equipment areas shall be incorporated into the overall design of buildings and landscaping so that the visual and acoustic impacts of these functions are fully contained and out of view from adjacent properties and public streets as set forth in UDC 11-3A-12. All ground level mechanical equipment shall be screened to the height of the unit as viewed from the property line; and all rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened as viewed from the farthest edge of the adjoining right-of-way, in accord with the Architectural Standards Manual (#4.3B, #4.3C). b. The pathway from the perimeter sidewalk along the southern boundary of the site to the main building entrance shall be distinguished from the vehicular driving surface through the use of pavers, colored or scored concrete, or bricks as set forth in UDC 11-3A-19B.4b. c. Depict all easements that exist on the subject lot per the recorded plat (Lost Rapids Subdivision). Any encroachments within existing easements should be permitted through the easement holder or as allowed by the UDC. d. Depict shrubbery that is no more than three (3) feet in height at maturity between entrances and financial transaction areas and the public street as set forth in UDC 11-3A-16C. The reed grass within the planter along the west boundary of the site and the falkner boxwood in the buffer along the north boundary of the site exceed 3-feet in height at maturity and should be replaced with shrubbery that meets this standard. e. Provide low-impact security lighting around the self-service facility (i.e. ATM) in accord with UDC 11-3A-16A. Depict on plan and submit a detail of the proposed lighting that complies with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-11. f. Widen the sidewalk to 7-feet on the south and east sides of the building where parking abuts to allow vehicles to overhang 2-feet (the length of stalls may be reduced to 17-feet); or, provide wheel stops within parking spaces to prevent vehicle overhang in accord with UDC 11-3C-5B.3, 4. g. Depict a minimum 5-foot wide perimeter buffer along the east boundary of the site per UDC 11-3B-8C.1, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C.1b; remove the buffer on the adjacent property from the plan. 3. Compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-11 – Drive-Through Establishment and 11- 4-3-17 – Financial Institution. 4. Compliance with the standards listed in 11-3A-16 Self-Service Uses (i.e. the ATM) is required. 5. Direct access to W. Chinden Blvd. and the north/south driveway along the west boundary of the Page 12 site is prohibited. 6. The previously approved short plat for Lost Rapids West (SHP-2022-0014) shall be recorded for the proposed configuration of the property prior to submittal of a building permit application for this site. 7. The location, access and safety features of all automated teller machines (ATMs) shall be subject to review and approval by the Meridian Police Department, and in accord with the standards set forth in section 11-3A-16 of this title per UDC 11-4-3-17. Submit documentation of such approval with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. 8. All approaches and entrances to ATMs should be highly visible and adequately lit so that people cannot loiter, or enter, without being seen in accord with UDC 11-4-3-17. The addition of security cameras are highly recommended. 9. Design Review has been approved for the design of the proposed structure as shown in Section VII.C. The proposed structure shall be constructed consistent with these elevations in accord with the Architectural Standards Manual; any modifications to the design shall be approved by the Planning Division. 10. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance application shall be submitted and approved for the proposed use prior to submittal of a building permit application. 11. The conditional use permit is valid for a maximum period of two (2) years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time, the Applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground as set forth in UDC 11-5B-6. A time extension may be requested as set forth in UDC 11-5B-6F. B. PUBLIC WORKS Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. Ensure no sewer services cross infiltration trenches. 2. Ensure no permanent structures (trees, bushes, buildings, carports, trash receptacle walls, fences, infiltration trenches, light poles, etc.). are built within the utility easement. 3. Applicant must abandon the blow-off at the end of the existing 8” water stub. All required connections (meters, fire-lines, hydrants, etc.) must come off this 8” stub. 4. A reimbursement agreement will need to signed with the City and $8,465.00 paid to the City for the installation of one streetlight at the property along Chinden prior to any form of occupancy. General Conditions of Approval 5. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. 6. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (UDC 11-3B-6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point Page 13 connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 7. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 8. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 9. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer’s Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development, and if so, how they will continue to be used, or provide record of their abandonment. 10. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. 11. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. 12. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 13. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 14. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 15. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 16. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 17. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. C. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT (ACHD) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=279718&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity D. IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT (ITD) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=282603&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity E. NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT (NMID) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=280536&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity Page 14 IX. FINDINGS A. Conditional Use (UDC 11-5B-6) Findings: The commission shall base its determination on the conditional use permit request upon the following: 1. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located. Staff finds the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed development and meet all dimensional and development regulations of the C-G zoning district. 2. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian comprehensive plan and in accord with the requirements of this title. Staff finds the proposed financial institution with a drive-through will be harmonious with the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with applicable UDC standards with the conditions noted in Section VIII of this report. 3. That the design, construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area. Staff finds the design, construction, operation and maintenance of the proposed use will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood, with the existing and intended character of the vicinity and will not adversely change the essential character of the area. 4. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. Staff finds the proposed use will not adversely affect other properties in the vicinity if it complies with the conditions in Section VIII of this report. 5. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, schools, parks, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer. Staff finds the proposed use will be served by essential public facilities and services as required. 6. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Staff finds the proposed use will not create additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. 7. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. Staff finds the proposed use will not be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by the reasons noted above. 8. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) Staff finds the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of any such features. 9. Additional findings for the alteration or extension of a nonconforming use: Page 15 a. That the proposed nonconforming use does not encourage or set a precedent for additional nonconforming uses within the area; and, This finding is not applicable. b. That the proposed nonconforming use is developed to a similar or greater level of conformity with the development standards as set forth in this title as compared to the level of development of the surrounding properties. ` This finding is not applicable. B. Administrative Design Review In order to grant approval for an administrative design review, the director shall determine that the proposed structural and/or site designs conform to the standards and meet or exceed the intent of the "City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual". The Director finds the proposed structure and site design conforms to the standards and meets the intent of the Architectural Standards Manual. E IDIAN;--- Applicant Presentation 6 K Q W K a J lKeyl3ank4 U w U a rn w w 3 MERIDIAN BRANCH ARCH I T E C T S O 5 W . HINDEN BLVD . + ENGINEERS Lj 1250 OLD RIVER ROAD, SUITE #201 Z CLEVELAND, OHIO 44113 a W W W H S B A R C H C 0 M U w 0 O K a 0 0 w r rn Of w 2 r 0 r z a r a r a ILL z 01 o w 0 3 z o w N K O Of w r J a w a W DATE ISSUE x r 8/26/2022 SCHEMATIC SET z z 0 r a U L� U W a rn 0 z a rn z a J a w rn w 2 r O W r J_ m N Z o a rn w of DRAWN BY: BIG JOB NO. 22114 U W r K O �% — Z z ti 1 w �r L III1■ Ih _ _ - _ .. •-'�* �•�' -•�■ — _ aft _ -- .. . i _ _ 1 } Im 90 r - - - PC co w Ir- O ram• � ,I r� 1 a� n z _ -w . _ N Ld O -fn }■� -•ice i=t _ -- Jr 4.6 t-al p- p 4 . , !?� L ` . t1j Jill. ill `1 dr .. -- • 1 r - 'IY-' .•ice}* ��; - - - L �- 1�� - y Ira am. - =r• r 66 N r Ji� a f a 04 �. - - -r z ti ti 1 - �r mks- •1 �. ;• +J k 3 UOf •� 1 -' OI O r y� 1- � � r � � � ��r J - ti �r _ 1 •• - w �! '�� - v1 r• 1 ��' r- r 4 x MQ L 1 ' �' :' .� Y ■•11 '11 •{r�a3 _ i.�4 _ J r• r r" 0 0 - fir. _L _ ■ IJ_ ' _ jr : I •'' - N d' �w + J T co 7 1 i 3 Z r - rjpF • w I %/Z a � 2 O J �.:•r■ uj 0 W L r I ' All r W Q o(- = 1 Ln LU rn �w r N = N U Y Q 00 SITE CONTEXT � Q Y m N N W Y r O� �r N� Y O /Z 6 SS W.CHINDEN BOULEVARD(20/26) PROJECT LOCATION Lu C W. CHINDEN BOULEVARD (20/26) z Lu ~ w z � e e a o p__p—TP P P P _ o — —71,LF — — — S89°17'35"E 149.25' — P — P P _ p p P P P —� — — — ——— — — —�\ — — — — — — � � —� � - - —; G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G GTG Z 8„GI 18"GI 18"GI 1 ° ` \\ I O „G1 „G1 18" 1 18"GI \_ 18'GI 18'GI 18"GI :— 8„ 18"GI 1 g"G1 18 GI 8.. n — _ _ w 18 18 61 18"GI —— W H is"r VICINITY MAP �Q"GI�a g"G "G ——TS"G 8"ram 18 � 18 GI _ NOT TO SCALE n _ LEGEND PROJECT SUMMARY PI PI /. PI PI PI I PI PI PI PI PI— PIT—P �—PI PI PI PI 1 \ \ JIR — — — PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE SITE DATA --- ----- -- ---\— — Vr--�— PROPOSED ------- --------- ____ ______ _____� / ------ ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE ------------------- MONUMENT SIGN --- ------------ -- PARCEL NUMBER(S): R5330760400 (SUBJECT TO CHANGE AFTER ROAD CENTERLINE PLAT IS RECORDED) — — — — — — — — — — EASEMENT LINE PROPERTY ADDRESS: 3513 W. CHINDEN BOULEVARD PROPOSED 1 I I I I 8"w 8"w WATER LINE (SIZE AS NOTED) CITY/STATE/ZIP: MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83646 0 5' SIDEWALK I I I I I a"s a"s SANITARY SEWER LINE (SIZE AS NOTED) I a I PROJECT AREA: ±1.04 ACRES EXISTING CURB I I I 12"so 12"sD STORM DRAINAGE LINE (SIZE AS NOTED) & GUTTER s I I I C N CURRENT ZONING: C—G P P POWER LINE (GENERAL RETAIL & SERVICE COMMERCIAL) —G—G— GAS LINE I c c CABLE TV LINE PROPOSED ZONING: SAME AS ABOVE N T T TELEPHONE LINE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 65 FEET Ec Ec EDGE OF GRAVEL PROPOSED BUILDING: ±3,420 SF PI PI PRESSURE IRRIGATION LINE ° ±40.8' GI GI GRAVITY IRRIGATION LINE PARKING REQUIREMENTS (PER CITY CODE SECTION 1 1-3C-6) I I 14 I I I a EP EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT wv FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING LIGHT POLE 11 I I 12 12 ONE (1) SPACE FOR EVERY FIVE HUNDRED (500) SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA °° 15' WATER VALVE PARKING REQUIRED: 7 STALLS ° I I PROPOSED BUILDING OS SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PARKING PROVIDED: ±3,420 SF ° LID STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE STANDARD PARKING: 15 STALLS O 0 1 TRANSFORMER HANDICAP PARKING: 1 STALLS 0 I PARKING REQUIRED Q TOTAL STALLS PROVIDED: 16 STALLS (1 STALL PER ±214 SF) ;O,- LIGHT POLE > p a 7 SETBACK REQUIREMENTS MI /I PARKING PROVIDED ° C PROPOSED ASPHALT FRONT YARD: 0' z MDR ILu ' ±9.8' 34' 16 0 I REAR YARD: Q -I s° I s ��09 M LOST RAPIDS WEST SUBDIVISION ° ° a ° PROPOSED CONCRETE INTERIOR SIDE YARD: 0' J BAINBRIDGE SUBDIBISION NO. 12 I o I J w I � (BOOK XXX, PAGE XXX) V STREET SIDE YARD: 0' fl. (BOOK 122, PAGE 19331) 0 I LOT 17, BLOCK 1 LANDSCAPE BUFFER: 35' (ALONG W. CHINDEN BOULEVARD)?02 LJJ \ Z s I I BLOCK 1 5'0 s o (VACANT) UTILITIES LOT 16 WATER: CITY OF MERIDIAN d° 45,189 SF 0 I SEWER: CITY OF MERIDIAN I I O 1 1.04 AC.± N ELECTRICAL: IDAHO POWER i \ \ I I o S S NATURAL GAS: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS CO.�� I TELEPHONE: CENTURYLINK BIKE RACK a < 0 I, ±°63.8 a � a II PROJECT TEAM±43.6 PROPERTY OWNER Qz Lu 00 NAME: GFI — MERIDIAN INVESTMENTS Co z �— I I IfII 15' I I ADDRESS: 74 E. 500 S., SUITE 200 — Lu EXISTING LIGHT 4 CITY/STATE/ZIP: BOUNTIFUL, UTAH 84010 LuQ Lu POLE l i I I ARCHITECT LLu J ±10.5' 34 NAME: HENGST STREFF BAJKO ARCHITECTS z °' CONTACT: BEN GINGRICH, AIA I I ADDRESS: 1250 OLD RIVER ROAD, SUITE 201 CITY/STATE/ZIP: CLEVELAND, OHIO O I PHONE: 216.325.1351 \ I i 2 ® 9' / EMAIL: bgingrich©hsbarch.com II \ S I I I 1 STRIPED C9? 9' / I ENGINEERING 0 36' N / NAME: KM ENGINEERING, LLP. O TRASH ENCLOSURE I I \ I CONTACT: KELLY KEHRER, P.E., P.L.S. 6 ® 9 ±8.8 ADDRESS: 5725 CITY/STATE/ZIP: BOISE,NIDAHO 83713 WAY U ±9.7' 1 STRIPED © 5' 24' 59' PHONE: 208.639.6939 a I I EMAIL: kelly@kmengllp.com 1 I I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT NAME: KM ENGINEERING, LLP. I I I CONTACT: ALYSSA YENSEN, PLA ADDRESS: 5725 N. DISCOVERY WAY I R I ° CITY/STATE/ZIP: BOISE, IDAHO 83713 / J I PHONE: 208.639.6939 CONNECT TO EXISTING oyensen@kmengllp.com EMAIL: a ensen@kme®kmen II com ' WATER & SEWER LINEOR —77 PROPOSED Lo / / \ 5' SIDEWALK H / V) -- - - - - — — -- — 11 EXISTING CURB w— w w w w w w w w \ w w w w w I w w- & GUTTER PRIVATE DRIVE PROPOSED \ I / - - - - _ o � c— c N89°17'1 6"W 149.25\ c —c Q — — c / i i---3-- C�}�—s s s s s s�� s s s s s N N / \ I I / a I I - ---- - -- - — --------- --------- N E N G I N E E R I N G 5725 NORTH DISCOVERY WAY z I C BOISE,IDAHO 83713 a / \ / PHONE(208)639-6939 P I / RAPIDS SUBDIVISION kmengllp.com (BOOK 119, PAGE 18496) LOT 3, BLOCK 1 I / DESIGN BY: ---- (COSTCO) DRAWN BY: JJ I� I I CHECKED BY: KSK o r I I DATE: 9/20/2022 N N PROJECT: 22-091 t m 0 0 20 40 60 SHEET NO. Q Plan Scale: 1" = 20' C 1.0 O N N d 128' (1) TREE REQUIRED PER 35 LF GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES (4) TREES REQUIRED PLANT SCHEDULE ��•`'��P�;,�;;��,yo•.,, (4) TREES PROVIDED �� ••6- 00*0**S,AYE �• 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND IDENTIFY EXISTING UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD DECIDUOUS TREES BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME SIZE MATURE HXW CLASS CITY 00 W. CHINDEN BOULEVARD UTILITIES WITHIN CONTRACT WORK AREAS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTACT DIG LINE, INC. ® 1.800.342.1585. PROVIDE ADEQUATE MEANS OF PROTECTION OF UTILITIES AND SERVICES DESIGNATED TO REMAIN. REPAIR UTILITIES DAMAGED DURING ACER TRUNCATUM 'PACIFIC SUNSET'TM 2"CAL. B&B 35'X30' CLASS II 3SITE WORK OPERATIONS AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. PACIFIC SUNSET MAPLE -165 71191 •2. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO THE AMERICAN NURSERYMAN STANDARDS FORL ��•�, _p P P P P P P TYPE AND SIZE SHOWN. SKYLDINEIHONEYC OCT SOS SKYLINE 2"CAL. B&B 35'X30' CLASS II 5 �'•.,�;DSCAY,��.�`, P_ A & 18"G11 -- --- ---- ACHD LANDSCAPE NOTES • PYRUS CALLERYANA'CAPITAL• 2"CAL. B&B 35'X15' CLASS II 11 1. TREES SHALL NOT BE PLANTED WITHIN THE 10' CLEAR ZONE OF ALL ACHD STORM CAPITAL CALLERY PEAR DRAIN PIPE, STRUCTURES, OR FACILITIES. G-_-c - - - c G G w 2. SEEPAGE BEDS MUST BE PROTECTED FROM ANY AND ALL CONTAMINATION DURING THE EXISTING TREES BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME SIZE MATURE HXW CLASS CITY G G c c c c c c c o'z � "cl 1s"cl s cl UJ: CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF THE LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 5 wapEXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING VARIES 3 18" I 18"GI 18"GI 18"GI 18"GI � •S G m UJ rn wPRESERVE AND PROTECT ,,.,,a"GI ,8"GI ,8 ° ---- GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES SEE KEY NOTE 6 a G_0 U O 18"GI 18"GI- z 0 Cr 0 0 ° ° o o Q z SHRUBS BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME SIZE MATURE HXW z g 1. ALL PLANT MATERIALS TO BE WATERED BY THE DEVELOPMENT OR SUBDIVISION - w Q w g Of PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM. I I PI PI � �_� �` O BUXUS MICROPHYLLA'FAULKNER' 2 GAL. 4'X3' 50 o~a a 2. COVERAGE; THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE ONE HUNDRED FAULKNER BOXWOOD PERCENT (100%) COVERAGE WITH HEAD TO HEAD SPACING OR TRIANGULAR SPACING AS APPROPRIATE. 10' - - /W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W T O HYDRANGEA PANICULATA'LITTLE LIME' 2 GAL. 4'X4 25 v v W W 3. MATCHED PRECIPITATION RATES: SPRINKLER HEADS SHALL HAVE MATCHED PRECIPITATION LITTLE LIME HYDRANGEA OWNER'S ASSOCIATION ° W W w w w W W Y w w PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION -0 - - - - - - - - - ID RATES WITHIN EACH CONTROL VALVE. EASEMENT I I I a Q N S W I� 0 0 0 0 0 00000000 0 0 00 0 0 0 14. IRRIGATION DISTRICTS: SPRINKLER HEADS IRRIGATING LAWN OR OTHER HIGH WATER z BLUE ARROW JUNIPER JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUM BLUE ARROW' 6•-8'B&B 12'X3• 3 DEMAND AREAS SHALL BE CIRCUITED SO THAT THEY ARE ON THE SEPARATE ZONE OR O W I 00 0 DISTRICT FROM THOSE IRRIGATING TREES, SHRUBS, OR OTHER REDUCED WATER _N a I , 0 O z DEMAND AREAS. i�l O 0 uj 0 RHAMNUS FRANGULA•FINE LINE' 10 GAL. 6'X3' 2 w � ° _ 10 S 1/i 0 N N 5. OVERSPRAY: SPRINKLER HEADS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO REDUCE OVERSPRAY ONTO FINE LINE BUCKTHORN ° 0 0 7 3 6 6 IMPERVIOUS SURFACES SUCH AS STREETS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, AND PARKING 4 I� 0 AREAS. 0 ROSA X'NEARLY WILD' 2 GAL. 2'X3' 28 W N t w NEARLY WILD ROSE I I� z 3 Of TREE PROTECTION NOTES ° 0 w GRASSES BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME SIZE MATURE HXW ° W1} 0 ° ° ° ° O 0 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE EXTREME CARE TO PROTECT THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE '�` 0 � ,0 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA'KARL FOERSTER' 1 GAL. 4'X2' 79 �I OF ALL TREES AT ALL TIMES THROUGHOUT PROJECT. 0 5 FEATHER REED GRASS 9' I W I 15 SHARED 2. PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK, TEMPORARY FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED MIN. PERIMETER I W DRIVE AISLE IMMEDIATELY AROUND EACH TREE IMPACTED BY DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION. PERENNIALS BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME SIZE MATURE HXW Oz LANDSCAPE I LANDSCAPE FENCING SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF THE ENTIRE - STRIP STRIP DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. +0 HEMEROCALLIS X'STELLA DE ORO' 1 GAL. 1'X2' 6 �I o ° 3. BULK MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, VEHICLES, AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND WASTE STELLA DE ORO DAYLILY 15' SHALL NOT BE STOCKPILED WITHIN HE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE. STRIP o RUDBECKIA FULGIDA'GOLDSTRUM' 1 GAL. 2'X2• 30 INCLUDING W 4. COMPACTION BY EQUIPMENT TRAFFIC IS PROHIBITED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE. SIDEWALK I W ��� 10' 12' 12' GOLDSTRUM BLACK-EYED SUSAN o 5. MAINTAIN WATERING WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE. APPLY A MIN. 1.5" OF WATER w I W Cb Q, OVER THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE PER WEEK. THIS IS A MIN. RECOMMENDATION. SALVIA NEMOROSA'MAY NIGHT' 1 GAL. 2'X2' 26 > ° 34' ° CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO DETERMINE IF MORE WATER IS NECESSARY DURING S • O MAY NIGHT SAGE 1 � CONSTRUCTION. w ° Io 6. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING TREES DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE THE I Q ° OTHER BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME CONT J I > I o CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM REMEDIAL WORK TO cc 1 ° S �9 Ile DAMAGED TREES AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. I l a J w EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN NONE 6,245 SF ED o ° I ° ° ° ° w PRESERVE AND PROTECT > > I I W I ° LO KEY NOTES (TYPICAL) ® SEE KEY NOTE 5 0 W� I I 1 ° ° -d ° ° 1 M 0 0 m UJI w I I ° o ° ° w 0 1. INSTALL 3' DIAMETER SHOVEL CUT TREE RING, WITH BARE EARTH SURFACE AT ALL C° D N N � ' ° ° w > > TREES WITHIN TURF AREAS. ® SEASONAL ANNUALS FLAT 86 CY w w I v ° ° • o w0 Of SEE KEY NOTES f °"° iv ( w 2. CLEAR VISION TRIANGLE. NO TREES SHALL BE PLANTED WITHIN A CLEAR VISION w ° ° �5 N D w w TRIANGLE. THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF ANY VEGETATIVE GROUND COVER AT MATURITY L 0w w WITHIN THE CLEAR VISION TRIANGLE SHALL BE 3' FROM THE ADJACENT STREET GRADE. ° + E) ° ° � � SOD/SEED BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME CONT ° I o 0 0 °o °4 1 ° w^^ 3. ALL PLANTED BEDS TO RECEIVE A MIN. 3" DEPTH ORGANIC PERMABARK (ROCK) MULCH ° H. ° WITH PERMEABLE FABRIC WEED BARRIER. SUBMIT SAMPLE TO OWNER FOR APPROVAL TURF SOD RHIZOMATOUS SOD 4,023 SF ° PRIOR TO ORDERING AND INSTALLING. THE USE OF MULCH OR ROCK AS THE ONLY 1 ° GROUND COVER IN REQUIRED PLANTING ARES IS PROHIBITED. IMPERMEABLE PLASTIC RHIZOMATOUS TALL FESCUE ° WEED BARRIERS ARE PROHIBITED. ° ° W 4. INSTALL FLAT-BLADE SHOVEL EDGING AT INTERFACE OF SOD AND PLANTER BED. SEE 10 0 L1.0-1. O Z W f Q 0 18 5. EXISTING LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION TO REMAIN. RETAIN, PROTECT, AND OR TREE SPECIES MIX Q ADJUST AS SHOWN. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE AND REQUIRED PROVIDED I PATCH BACK ALONG PHASE BOUNDARY AS NECESSARY. TRANSITION BETWEEN NEW Q g AND EXISTING LANDSCAPE SHALL BE NON RECOGNIZABLE AND COHESIVE WHEN 19 REQUIRED TREES 3 3 Z � W FINISHED. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO REPAIR ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPE I W Ln CONSTRUCTION.QP1 PLANTING STHED IRRIGATION COMPONENTS CONTRACTOR SLLENSURETHAT DAMAGED AS A RESULT THE EXISTING IRRIGATION TREE MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS Q Z ° W I N SYSTEM REMAINS OPERABLE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND THAT FOLLOWING CIDQ 1 w 3 9 CONSTRUCTION, THE EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM OPERATES AS GOOD, OR BETTER THERE ARE NO HEALTHY TREES > 4" CAL. PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL Q U Ic THAN EXISTED PRIOR TO THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE, AT NO PARKING CALCULATIONS '�' o v) ° i ° _ ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, PLANT MATERIALS DAMAGED DURING EXECUTION OF _ Q I • ° Q G THIS PROJECT OR DAMAGED DUE TO THE CONTRACTORS FAILURE TO MAINTAIN PARKING CALCULATIONS REQUIRED PROVIDED OPERATION OF THE EXISTING SYSTEM DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. z ° W IC �j . ° ° ° ° O (NP•) °' � ° O ° 6. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. PRESERVE AND PROTECT. SEE TREE PROTECTION NOTES. PARKING STALLS 7 16 � ' w5 Q ° 24 0 7. PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. LANDSCAPING - 1660 SF LANDSCAPE/3580 SF OF PARKING NA 46% J I W I s ° 0 ° I R W °° ° ° ° ° 8. TRASH ENCLOSURE. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS o 3 O O O O O Q Q 0 w 9. BIKE RACK. SEE BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS AND L1.0-3. (1) BICYCLE PARKING SPOT PER (25) VEHICLE PARKING REQUIRED PROVIDED 0 C)w c� (17) VEHICLE PARKING / 25 1 2 ;n N z J 10. SEASONAL ANNUALS. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ANNUALS AS SHOWN AS A PART OF / Q •Y Y W W •Y •Y Y W W W W .� .� .� N 0 _ w o Q THIS PROJECT. SUBMIT ANNUAL SELECTION TO OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE .v-I�, ,� ,� °, °, 0 z m u- NOTE: (1) BICYCLE RACK = (2) PARKING SPOTS / w w FOR APPROVAL. ANNUALS SHALL BE ON A DEDICATED SPRAY ZONE. / z(N I •Y Y W W •Y •Y •Y •Y I W I •Y Y W ° z z Q / I w w w w w w w w w Ld / / I W 2 cwn REMOVE DEAD DAMAGED / c c Vic- - c c- - c c c- poLd BRANCHES AND PRUNE TO / / I r -3- - ---- - ©--s s s s s s INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF a J ARBORICULTURE STANDARDS; PRIVATE DRIVE IMPROPERLY PRUNED TREES o -------- p (AS DETERMINED BY THE o � I / Q / I I � - ------ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) SHALL BE REMOVED AND 58' (2)-BVC WOOD TREE o o0 o O REPLACE. -' (1) TREE REQUIRED PER 35 LF STAKES(MIN. 6' HT) o 0 TRUNK FLARE. LOCATE PRIOR o (2) TREES REQUIRED CHAINLOCK �0 C O TO PLANTING. FLARE SHALL ;° a (2) TREES PROVIDED TREE TIES O O BE VISIBLE AFTER PLANTING. 2" SCH. 40 4 "O LANDSCAPE PLAN STL PIPE CIRCLE 6" MULCH PER PLAN KEEP N MIN 1"-2" AWAY FROM TRUNK (2 O.D.) 0 20 40 60 3 FLARE " THICK FINISH GRADE STL ANCHOR PLATE Plan/Profile Scale: 1" = 20' MULCH AT �- / (3)-9/160 HOLES 0 3' 24" 4 4��0 W PLANTER ROOT- I= 3" HT. WATERING BASING TURF 8" BEDS BALL =II = BERM BIKE RACK N �S MOUNT CONTACT INFORMATION DEPTH - - FERTILIZER TABLETS - y FOLD BACK BURLAP FROM !'" �✓ _ �,. DIA.OWNER LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT ' - �I II I II II I II I I I III TOP OF ROOTBALL. HOLES FOR GFI - MERIDIAN INVESTMENTS KM ENGINEERING, LLP II II I II III I II�I. II I I= ^`'�-I _ _ NOTE: REMOVE TREATED ROOT- BACKREMOFILLVE WSOILIRE EM XK GENTLY BY INSTALLERR -- = E N2G NORTH DE coVRRYwaYG a 74 E. 500 S., SUITE 200 5725 NORTH DISCOVERY WAY I I III-III- -' _ - BALL ( ) w OR SYNTHETIC BURLAP PACK BACKFILL USING WATER - BOISE,IDAHO 83713 Z BOUNTIFUL, UTAH 84010 BOISE, IDAHO 83713 11- - _ = o, =III III- COMPLETELY. REMOVE WIDTH TO SETTLE SOIL AROUND 12" DIA ` 6 4 DIA PHONE(208)639 6939 III-III I I I I III -I I I- - -III-.I I ANCHOR kmengllp.com PHONE: (208) 639-6939 FINISH I -I I li IIII-III-III=� I III I=I ANY SOIL AND/OR ROOTBALL oS-1 EMBEDMENT CIRCLE FAX: (208) 639-6930 GRADE I-I I I-III= - I I= =I' TOPSOIL MREE CROWN AFTER ULCH AWAY FROM 8 MIN PLANTING PIT 8" MIN ROOTBALL ON UNDISTURBED ❑S-4 SUB FLOOR DESIGN BY: 1CH N CONTACT: ALYSSA YENSEN, PLA ' ' I i 1-1 I 1=1III PIT SHALL BE A MIN. 2 TIMES WIDER SOIL z EMAIL: oyensen®kmengllp.com INSTALLATION. THAN ROOTBALL AT BASE AND A NOTES: DRAWN BY: JCH CUT EDGE MIN. 3 TIMES WIDER THAN ROOTBALL 1. 290 SERIES BIKE RACK BY DuMor F OR APPROVED EQUAL. CHECKED BY: AY AT FINISH GRADE. DEPTH SHALL BE 2. ALL STL. MEMBERS COATED W/ZINC E SAME AS THE ROOTBALL. " NOTES: DATE: 9/20/2022 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO INSURE THAT ALL TREES ARE PLANTED THEN FINISHED W/POLYESTER POWDER COATING. 3. J"X3 J" EXPANSION ANCHOR BOLTS PROVIDED PROJECT: 22-091 STRAIGHT AND THAT THEY REMAIN STRAIGHT FOR A MINIMUM OF 1 YEAR. ALL FOR OPTIONS S-2 & S-4. 3 STAKING SHALL BE REMOVED AT THE END OF THE ONE YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD. SHEET NO. SHOVEL CUT EDGE 2 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING AND STAKING DETAIL BIKE RACK DETAIL NTS NTS NTS L 1.0 N N a 80'-10" 14'-8" 51'-6" 14'-8" 14'-8" 4'-3" 5'-2" 3'-8" 5'-2" 4'-5" 10'-4" 3'-8" 10'-4" 4'-6" 2'-1" 10'-6" 2'-1" • 0 ARCH I T E C T S OFFICE + E N G I N E E R S ETO 112 1250 OLD RIVER ROAD, SUITE #201 N 110 ONFERENC CLEVELAND, OH 44113 111 son W W W H S B A R C H C 0 M C14 ® oo❑ D o o Vestibule - �' son `0 9'-6" aC3 A. o sonow o �Onn •rr0 o son N � C4 `I/ O, s M F � Lobby OP 9 102 BO BREAK 106 _ - DATE ISSUE 12/8/22 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS r-1 OP o � � 0 N WOMEN'S I I I I I I I I r OO UCS PRNT � L ° o 0 it-oil M I I I pp L_ UCS -6" l_61' I I 0 0 _ Office Z Office ECR Teller Work DRAWN BY: MRW/BG a M 105 0 104 Ucs 103 JOB. NO: 22114 ❑b� r, ❑b0 0 0 I I ❑ MEN'S UCS o MFP 108 2 M DOJ AN z I= o I 107 iv o L I \ i:N o 7'-7" 9'-2" 5'-2" 5'-2" 5'-2" 3'-4" 10'-4" 3'-4" 10'-4" V 1'-0" 21'-3" O 60'-7" 81'-10" N N O r-I z 0 a CS J CD Z Lu w oz < LLI = U G✓ w 1 GROUND FLOOR PLAN�-2 1/4 — 1 -0 North PRELIMINARY FLOOR s PLAN TOWER PARAPET EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND C2 ARCH I T E C T S 22 -5 TAG DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION Note C-1 AW-1 ALUMINUM MAPES PRE-ENGINERED ALUMINUM SEE SPEC MANUAL FOR DETAILS. SEE + E N G I N E E R S TOP OF UPPER PARAPET SUNSHADE SUNSHADE WITH CANTELEAVER WALL WALL SECTION FOR THROUGH-BOLT C-1 m 19'-10" MOUNTING. SUNSHADE TO RECEIVE MOUNTING 1250 OLD RIVER ROAD, SUITE #201 — LOUVERS AND 8" SMOOTH FASCIA PER SPEC CLEVELAND, OH 44113 TOP OF PARAPET W W W H S B A R C H C O M EF-1 EF-1 18'-611 MANUAL. PROVIDE CUSTOM KYNAR "RED" TO MATCH KEYBANK PROVIDED SAMPLE. C-1 COPING PREFINISHED ALUM. COPING IN CLEAR C-1 ANOD. FINISH — — — — — — — — — — — — — T_0.CANOPY PARAPET 13'-6" C-2 COPING PREFINISHED ALUM. COPING MATCHING '00� WP-1 FINISH. EF-1 WD 1 wP-1 EF-1 EIFS DRYVIT OUTSULATION MD SYSTEM WITH ro, Aw-1 Aw-1 #481ST CLAY COLOR IN SAND PEBBLE FINE WINDOW/CANOPY HEADER gL FINISH. 9'-0" SF-1 STOREFRONT KAWNEER TRIFAB 451 STOREFRONT SYSTEM MAX 0.40 U VALUE /0 WITH 1" CLEAR INSULATED GLAZING AND 1" 1p SPANDREL PANELS WHERE SHOWN. REFER TO WINDOW LEGEND ON A4.0 FOR DETAILS. EF-1 S—F-1-1 FSF-1 STOREFRONT FINISH TO BE CLEAR SF-1 ANODIZED ALUMINUM. ST-1 STONE DRYVIT OUTSULATION MD SYSTEM WITH DATE ISSUE ST-1 ST-1 ST-1 TERRANEO FINISH. COLOR #209 EVEREST. 12/8/22 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS — — GROUND FLOOR WD-1 WOOD PANEL DRYVIT OUTSULATION MD SYSTEM WITH 0'-0" WOODGRAIN FINISH. COLOR TBD. WP-1 RED PANEL DRYVIT OUTSULATION MD SYSTEM WITH REFLECTIT ACRYLIC FINISH IN CUSTOM RED COLOR TO MATCH KEYBANK SAMPLE. 2 SOUTH ELEVATION - SD SD-3 1/411 = 1'-011 DRAWN BY: MRW/BG JOB. NO: 22114 z O C-2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — TOWER PARAPET 22'-5" c-1 V V TOP OF UPPER PARAPET O C-1 — — — — — — — — — — — 19'-10" �\ _ TOP OF PARAPET OgL _ 18'-6" WP-1I FEF-1 WD-1 ' Z AW-1 AW AW-1 AW-1 1 O WINDOW/CANOPY HEADER — 9'-0" Z Z SF-1 SF-1 FsF-1 SF-1 SF-1 I FsF-1 SF-1 SF-1 ST-1 Z GROUND FLOOR OgL 0'-0" J CD Z W >m w oz W z ¢ 1 w EAST ELEVATION - SD SD-3 1/411 = 11-011 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS C-2 EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND TOWER PARAPET 22'-5" TAG DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION Note A R C H I T E C T S c_1 C-1 AW-1 ALUMINUM MAPES PRE-ENGINERED ALUMINUM SEE SPEC MANUAL FOR DETAILS. SEE + E N G I N E E R S TOP OF UPPER_PARAPET SUNSHADE SUNSHADE WITH CANTELEAVER WALL WALL SECTION FOR THROUGH-BOLT 19'-10" 1250 OLD RIVER ROAD, SUITE #201 TOP OF PARAPET _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ � � MOUNTING. SUNSHADE TO RECEIVE MOUNTING OH 18'-6" LOUVERS AND 8" SMOOTH FASCIA PER SPEC 44113 MANUAL. PROVIDE CUSTOM KYNAR "RED" W W W . H S B A R C H C 0 M W_D-11 TO MATCH KEYBANK PROVIDED SAMPLE. - - C-1 COPING PREFINISHED ALUM. COPING IN CLEAR TO.CANOPY PARAPET C-1 ANOD. FINISH /L 13'-6" - - - - - - - - C-2 COPING PREFINISHED ALUM. COPING MATCHING O�" WP-1 FINISH. WP_1 EF-1 EF-1 EIFS DRYVIT OUTSULATION MD SYSTEM WITH ro, AW-1 AW-1 #481ST CLAY COLOR IN SAND PEBBLE FINE tSJ. WINDOW/CANOPY HEADER FINISH. 9' 011 SF-1 STOREFRONT KAWNEER TRIFAB 451 STOREFRONT SYSTEM MAX 0.40 U VALUE WITH 1" CLEAR INSULATED GLAZING AND 1" �wD-1 SPANDREL PANELS WHERE SHOWN. REFER EF-1 TO WINDOW LEGEND ON A4.0 FOR DETAILS. SF-1 I STOREFRONT FINISH TO BE CLEAR - - ANODIZED ALUMINUM. ST-1 STONE DRYVIT OUTSULATION MD SYSTEM WITH DATE ISSUE - - -- - - - ST-1 TERRANEO FINISH. COLOR #209 EVEREST. 12/8/22 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS GROUND FLOOR WD-1 WOOD PANEL DRYVIT OUTSULATION MD SYSTEM WITH WOODGRAIN FINISH. COLOR TBD. 16'-6" 8' 2" 3'-101/2" 11'-2" 2'-0" SPANDREL GLASS FALSE WP-1 RED PANEL DRYVIT OUTSULATION MD SYSTEM WITH WINDOW,THIS LOCATION ONLY. REFLECTIT ACRYLIC FINISH IN CUSTOM RED TOTAL LINEAR FRONTAGE: 42'6„ COLOR TO MATCH KEYBANK SAMPLE. GLAZING LINEAR FRONTAGE: 19 4 NORTH ELEVATION SD PERCENT GLAZING BY FRONTAGE: 45% 1 SD-4 1/411 - 11-091 DRAWN BY: MRW/BG JOB. NO: 22114 z O c-2 TOWER PARAPET OILV 22'-5" C-1 O TOP OF UPPER PARAPET — — — — — — — — — — — C-1 19'-10" TOP OF PARAPET WP-1 18'-6" Q FIEF-1 I pr I _ WD-1 C-1 QT0.CANOPY PARAPET OIL O 13'-6" Q EF-1 AW-1 AW-1 AW-1 AW_1 AW-1 WINDOW/CANOPY HEADER OIL 91-011 EF-1 SF-1 SF 4-1 SF-1 EF-1 SF-1 SF-1 SF-1 ST-1 ST-1 - 0 cs ST-1 ST-1 J GROUND FLOOR m 0'-0" z o WLu oz z Q 2 WEST ELEVATION - SD W = o U uj SD-4 1/4n = 1'-011 �e 3i � EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ARCH I T E C T S + E N G I N E E R S 1250 OLD RIVER ROAD, SUITE #201 CLEVELAND, OH 44113 o ® W W W H S B A R C H C 0 M ----------------- ------- '0 ` 0 I ro, G� �001 DATE ISSUE 12/8/22 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 10 SOUTHWEST VIEW 9 SOUTH-EAST VIEW SD-5 DRAWN BY: Author JOB. NO: 22114 z O _ _ • � Z . , N N _ a - oc m a 0 z z 0 z a � oo m 11 cs NORTH-WEST VIEW 12 NORTHEAST VIEW z o SD-5 SD-5 w ui p Z W z ¢ U LU w 3D VIEWS