Loading...
2022-12-13 Work session CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 4:30 PM Minutes ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Councilwoman Liz Strader Councilman Treg Bernt Councilwoman Jessica Perreault Councilman Luke Cavener Councilman Joe Borton Councilman Brad Hoaglun Mayor Robert E. Simison CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Hoaglun, Seconded by Councilman Borton. Voting Yea: Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Bernt, Councilwoman Perreault, Councilman Cavener, Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun 1. C-Shell Starbucks 2022-0026 Water Main Easement 2. TM Crossing Subdivision No. 4 Water Main Easement No. 1 3. Final Plat for Gander Creek South No. 3 (FP-2022-0026) by Kent Brown Planning Services, generally located south of W. McMillan Rd. on the south side of the Five Mile Creek, west of N. McDermott Rd. 4. Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law for Alden Ridge Subdivision (H-2022-0059) by Dave Yorgason, Tall Timber Consulting, located at 6870 N. Pollard Ln., and (3) parcels to the north and east, directly east of State Highway 16 and south of the Phyllis Canal at the northern edge of the Meridian City Impact 5. Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law for Hadler Neighborhood (H-2022-0064) by Laren Bailey, Conger Group, located at 7200 S. Locust Grove Rd., approximately 1/2 mile south of the Locust Grove and Lake Hazel intersection on the east side of Locust Grove Rd. 6. Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law for Ledges Business Center (SHP-2022- 0015) by Kent Brown Planning, located at 4120 N. Linder Rd. 7. Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law for Lost Rapids West (SHP-2022-0014) by KM Engineering, generally located on the south side of W. Chinden Blvd., 1/4 mile west of N. Ten Mile Rd. 8. Resolution 22-2361: A Resolution Vacating the remainder of S. Black Marlin Ln., located within lots 10-18, Block 1 of Interstate Center Subdivision 9. Resolution 22-2360: A Resolution Approving Adoption of an Amendment to the Citizen Participation Plan for the Community Development Block Grant; Authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to Execute and Attest the Same on Behalf of the City of Meridian; and Providing an Effective Date ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS \[Action Item\] 10. Community Development Block Grant Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report 11. Parks and Recreation Department: Lakeview Golf Course Operations, Capital Projects, and Fee Adjustment Discussion 12. Parks and Recreation Department: Master Plan Update ADJOURNMENT 5:31 PM Meridian City Council Work Session December 13, 2022. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 4:37 p.m., Tuesday, December 13, 2022, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Joe Borton, Luke Cavener, Treg Bernt, Jessica Perreault, Brad Hoaglun and Liz Strader. Also present: Chris Johnson, Bill Nary, Joy Hall, Crystal Campbell, Steve Siddoway, Mike Barton, Jamie Leslie, Joe Bongiorno and Dean Willis. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE Liz Strader _X_ Joe Borton _X_ Brad Hoaglun _X_Treg Bernt X Jessica Perreault _X_ Luke Cavener X_ Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Council, we will go ahead and call this meeting to order. For the record it is December 13th, 2022, at 4:37 p.m. We will begin this afternoon's work session with roll call attendance. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Simison: Next item up is adoption of the agenda. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I move that we adopt the agenda as published. Borton: Second. Simison: Motion and second to adopt the agenda as published. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the agenda is adopted. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item 1. C-Shell Starbucks 2022-0026 Water Main Easement 2. TM Crossing Subdivision No. 4 Water Main Easement No. 1 Meridian City Council Work Session December 13,2022 Page 2 of 17 3. Final Plat for Gander Creek South No. 3 (FP-2022-0026) by Kent Brown Planning Services, generally located south of W. McMillan Rd. on the south side of the Five Mile Creek, west of N. McDermott Rd. 4. Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law forAlden Ridge Subdivision (H- 2022-0059) by Dave Yorgason, Tall Timber Consulting, located at 6870 N. Pollard Ln., and (3) parcels to the north and east, directly east of State Highway 16 and south of the Phyllis Canal at the northern edge of the Meridian City Impact 5. Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law for Hadler Neighborhood (H- 2022-0064) by Laren Bailey, Conger Group, located at 7200 S. Locust Grove Rd., approximately 1/2 mile south of the Locust Grove and Lake Hazel intersection on the east side of Locust Grove Rd. 6. Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law for Ledges Business Center (SHP-2022-0015) by Kent Brown Planning, located at 4120 N. Linder Rd. 7. Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law for Lost Rapids West (SHP- 2022-0014) by KM Engineering, generally located on the south side of W. Chinden Blvd., 1/4 mile west of N. Ten Mile Rd. 8. Resolution 22-2361: A Resolution Vacating the remainder of S. Black Marlin Ln., located within lots 10-18, Block 1 of Interstate Center Subdivision 9. Resolution 22-2360: A Resolution Approving Adoption of an Amendment to the Citizen Participation Plan for the Community Development Block Grant; Authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to Execute and Attest the Same on Behalf of the City of Meridian; and Providing an Effective Date Simison: Next up is the Consent Agenda. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I move approval of the Consent Agenda and for the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest. Borton: Second. Meridian City Council Work Session December 13,2022 Page 3 of 17 Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Those opposed nay? The ayes have it and the Consent Agenda is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] Simison: There were no items moved from the Consent Agenda. DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS [Action Item] 10. Community Development Block Grant Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report Simison: So, we will move on to Department/Commission Reports. Item 10 is the Community Development Block Grant Consolidation Annual Performance Evaluation Report from Crystal Campbell. Campbell: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. So, this is for our most recently completed program year '21, which ended -- it started October '21 -- '21 and ended September. So, our end of year report is called our CAPER, the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report, and the purpose of this presentation is to give you guys an overview of our annual accomplishments, our evaluation of our progress towards our five year goals, and also to open the public comment period. The goals that were identified in this con plan were to improve accessibility, enhance homeownership opportunities, provide social services, stabilize the rental gap and provide admin and fair housing activities. This was the final year of our con plan. So, all of the five year goals that was the final that we did on those. So, our first goal of improving accessibility -- at the beginning of the con plan we have to project how many we will serve throughout the five years. So, when they did this con plan they anticipated serving 220 individuals under this goal and we ended up serving more -- closer to 75,000 and this is benefits that were related mainly to public facilities and infrastructure improvements. This year we worked with Public Works to install or modernize 25 streetlights on walking routes to Meridian schools. We also worked with Parks and Rec on two different activities, one was the Chateau Park playground where they installed an all abilities playground. There is going to be some additional features in PY-22 and also the walking path for the northwest area to provide better access to that LMI area will be completed during PY-22. We also completed Fairview Avenue connection, which was the multi-use path that had an accessible ramp and handrail. Under enhancing home ownership opportunities we ended up at 118 percent of this goal. During PY-21 we were able to work with Neighborworks Boise and they provided emergency accessibility and weatherization repairs to seven households. We also identified social services and we ended up at 206 percent of our five year plan on that one. The Boys and Girls Club provided extended care scholarships to 39 youth and Jesse Tree was able to provide rental assistance to 28 individuals. We also provided social services with our CARES Act funds and under this one the Boys and Meridian City Council Work Session December 13,2022 Page 4 of 17 Girls Club they started a counseling program for youth, but they had a hard time identifying eligible participants and so they ended up only serving three and, then, returning the funds to us, so that we could better utilize those funds. We did provide funding for ID AEYC for child care scholarships and that does not expire until May and so far they have been able to provide 37 children with scholarships for childcare. We also have worked with Neighborworks Boise on mortgage assistance and the -- they start taking applications in September and so they will have a few more payments to close out those applications, but they were able to serve 66 people. For our goal of stabilizing the rental gap, that is actually being reported under public services, so we don't have any accomplishments to report on under this one. For admin and fair housing we provided subrecipient management. We administered the additional CARES Act funding. We ensure deadlines are met for timeliness reporting and applications. We receive and provide ongoing training. We look for process improvements and we also coordinate with other local entitlement communities and we facility -- we helped to facilitate the Idaho Fair Housing Forum. Our total resources during this year was 1.3 million. Of this 37 percent was our PY-21 funds. We also had about 30 percent of the CARES Act funds. Then we had a little bit of the 2019 funding left over and we also had about 30 percent of that was the PY-20 funding. Our total expenditures this year was 753,000 dollars and this is a breakdown of the different goals and how it was spent. So, as you can see the majority of our funding goes towards public facility and infrastructure improvements. So, of our remaining resources about 250,000 of those are our regular CDBG funds. We completed these six projects, the Fairview Avenue sidewalk connection, Chief Joseph streetlights, admin fair housing, Boys and Girls Club scholarships and emergency rental assistance. Some of those remaining resources will go towards our continuing projects and all three of these are expected to close fairly early in this new program year, but those are the homeowner repair program, Chateau -- Chateau park playground and Locust Grove and Pine streetlights and, then, the remaining amount will be reallocated to the two projects that were identified as alternate projects in our PY-21 action plan, which was the east MHS MMS streetlights and home buyer assistance. For our remaining CARES Act funds we completed our admin and youth counseling programs and we are continuing with the childcare scholarships, the Children's Museum and, then, we are finishing up the payments for the mortgage assistance and the remaining amounts will be reallocated toward the Woodrose Apartments acquisition. Also in our CAPER they asked us to report on our ongoing efforts. So, for housing affordability we spoke to the programs that we use to purchase housing or remaining housing that is affordable. We also talk a little bit about we provide services to offset the basic living expenses for public housing. We discussed our efforts to coordinate with the Ada County Housing Authority for homelessness and other special needs. We collaborate with the agencies who specialize in those areas and other actions that we have taken deal with the Can-Ada Collaborative Fair Housing and just how we addressed that. So, our timeline for this tonight is our presentation and, then, I will ask you guys to open the public comment period, which will go until December 29th and, then, I will take all of the comments and accept them all and respond to any and to submit the -- the CAPER to HUD on December 30th. This is my information to -- if anybody has any comments, then, they can call me or e-mail me or I'm here in City Hall, anybody can come talk to me at anytime, and starting tomorrow a draft of the CAPER will be available on our website and with that I will stand for questions. Meridian City Council Work Session December 13,2022 Page 5 of 17 Simison: Thank you, Crystal. Council, any questions or comments for Crystal? Thank you very much. Appreciate it. 11. Parks and Recreation Department: Lakeview Golf Course Operations, Capital Projects, and Fee Adjustment Discussion Simison: Okay. Next item up is Item 11, which is Parks and Recreation Department Lakeview Golf Course operations capital projects and fee adjustment discussion. Mr. Barton. Barton: Good afternoon, Mayor and Council. Happy to be here. So, it's been a while since we talked to you about the operations over at Lakeview Golf Course and haven't talked to you in awhile about the capital improvement project that we started early -- late spring, early summer. So, we are here to do that. We are also here to talk about an adjustment to several of the fees. So, first off operations. Just the highlights. On August 1 st the city entered into an agreement with Roosters Catering and Eatery to operate the food and beverage component of the golf course. That was the outcome of an RFP that was advertised. From what I have heard Roosters is doing a phenomenal job. The hours are up. The -- you know, the food's been good and we -- we have kept periodic check- ins and so from that standpoint, hearing nothing but positives from -- from that. Probably the big one is on October 1 st the city took over full operations of the golf course and that includes we, you know, took -- took in -- took -- assimilated all the employees. So, the HR component. We are doing the IT. We are doing the financial reporting. So, the whole thing is under the city's guidance, leadership. Kemper Sports kind of stayed on for a short period of time to ease the transition, so we could -- you know, some of the financial stuff had to be merged together and some of the HR stuff. But Kemper Sports is -- we are -- we are no longer needing their services, so it's a hundred percent being run by the city. Part of that, Kemper Sports has maintained both a personnel account and an operating account that the city funded. That initial startup was a hundred thousand dollars into each one and we have kind of kept that -- they have kept that -- those accounts open and as of now the -- the year end or the cash balance in the combination of both those accounts, inclusive of that initial funding, is 570,000. So, over the course of two years we have made 370,000, which, you know, in light of everything that's gone on, construction wise and we have had a little bit of weather here and there, I think that's all good news and very positive on the operations. As far as the capital improvement project goes, the big one is the irrigation system. We have installed -- the heads and the piping are complete. The -- we are doing concrete cart paths. Tees and greens. The cart paths are prepped. The concrete is 50 percent complete right now. It's going a little bit slow in the winter. They are still out there pouring, although later this week may change things. We have been in the upper 30s and it's pretty good with ground heaters and blankets and they can keep working, but slow, but still progressing very well. The -- the quality is excellent. We did some ground repair where the irrigation system has never covered the dirt, it was just -- it was just bare ground. So, we went in and hydro seeded all that. So, in the springtime when the weather warms up that -- that seed is just kind of laying there dormant. When the weather warmed up it will -- it will pop up and we have irrigation water, so it will be corner to corner green. And, then, the well -- just a couple of -- the well is going to be Meridian City Council Work Session December 13,2022 Page 6 of 17 installed here this winter. A couple of fun facts that the irrigation system is controlled by the two wires in a jacketed control wire. We put in 21 miles of wire. It's -- a wire has to go to each individual head and there is about 1 ,900 heads. So, we have got 21 miles of that. We went under the road ten different times. Some of the piping under the road is as big as 12 inches, so we bored that. Didn't hit anything. That was awesome. So, the project is -- where it stands now it's on time. They have until May 1 st to complete it. We are on time and we are on budget. So, all -- all positive good news there. So, as we have lived with this and we take feedback from the public and, you know, we periodically check, we have benchmarked what we are doing against other courses and it's come to our attention that it's time to adjust a couple of fees. So, the first one that we would like to adjust and -- and just -- you know, process wise what we want to do is kind of get a nod of heads and -- before we notice these fees and, then, bring them back for a public hearing and, then, a resolution to adopt them. So, just a nod of heads to see if we are in the right -- kind of headed in the right direction. If there is something that you think we should do differently let us know now. We didn't want to surprise you at a -- at a public hearing. So, we are looking for feedback. The first one is the trail fee and that's the fee that we charge if you have your own cart and you bring that to the course -- right now it's 580 dollars. Our proposal is to reduce that by 50 percent down to 290 dollars. If you buy an annual pass and you use the course's carts, we are proposing to leave that unchanged, because there is quite a bit of wear and tear on the course's carts that we have to maintain. So, there is -- there is cost there. Annual passes. We would like to institute a resident, nonresident fee, so that -- we are not proposing a reduction in the resident fee, but we are proposing that we charge nonresidents and added ten percent to each annual pass and that would be across all pass offerings. So, not just like an unlimited -- family unlimited, there is about eight to ten different offerings. We are proposing a ten percent increase if you are a nonresident. Also came to our attention that the winter rate -- we have always had winter rates and they have been reduced, but it wasn't reduced across all categories. Just for example the winter rate was 29 dollars and the senior rate was 28 dollars. So, the seniors weren't getting the discount to play in the winter. So, our proposal is to reduce rates four dollars for 18 holes across all offerings and reduce those fees two dollars for nine holes across all offerings. So, if you are a senior, you play in the winter, where it's 28 dollars during -- during the year, you can now get four dollars off of that. So, it just makes more sense. The other -- the other proposal is a four percent price increase to green fees. We did a six percent increase last year. Our costs are going up higher than it was -- the six percent was lost probably almost immediately. So, we are proposing another four percent. In addition to that, where there is a little bit of foregone revenue in the -- in the cart, the trail fees that we would like to recapture with that four percent. And, then, cart fees cost to maintain the carts, obviously, were going up. Our proposal is to increase the cart fee dollars for 18 holes and a dollar for nine and, then, a ten percent increase on range fees. So, with that I'm happy to answer any questions you have and take feedback. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council, questions, comments? Mr. Borton. Not Barton. Meridian City Council Work Session December 13,2022 Page 7 of 17 Borton: Certainly. Thanks, Mike. I kind of want to dovetail on your comments. I have been talking pretty closely with the golf course community and -- and pretty well embedded with -- with this particular issue. So, there is a couple of-- two things are true. One is there is not -- there is more than one way to skin the cat on rates and what you do with each of these. There is not a single path that you necessarily have to go forward. But the --the policy consideration that I think-- I'm supportive of what you have presented, Mike. I think the golf course community would be supportive of this. I think it captures two things that we can do now. We talked a lot about trying to provide a -- a tier somehow where our residents, who have through our savings, funded a lot of these improvements, can receive either some benefit. In this case their -- their pass rates aren't going up. There is some process reasons why you can't create tiers in the daily rates in the same way as you can for passes. So, this is a -- this is a feasible first step to use the annual pass, resident, nonresident that it rewards our resident taxpayers somewhat and the other part is the annual pass for -- or the trail fee for the annual pass and -- and there is maybe a hundred of those -- a hundred or so of those. These are folks that buy the pass to use their own cart all year and the vast majority of them are the seniors who live on or around the course. They just -- probably 95 percent of them really. And these are the folks that, one, have been -- the vast majority have been living there for a long time. They, through the prior ownership, were the ones that were out donating twenty dollars to buy bricks to get the patio bricks done and, then, they are donating sand and trying to help plant trees and they kind of did some sweat equity to keep the course going through difficult times and -- and those folks usually buy an annual pass and a trail fee. So, to them it's kind of a combined expenditure. It's a relatively minor impact on the bottom line for the -- for the city, but it does account for kind of our long standing residents who have been on and around the course loyal through this process. So, you have been in communication with them a lot, so that's some of the -- the policy reasons behind this. Again there is not one way to do it, but I thought this one, with your work and what your team had done, made great sense and addressed those community concerns. So, thanks for letting me add a little context to how we got here. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Well, I'm really happy to hear that the irrigation project is on budget and on time. The many conversations we have had it's been my biggest concern for our course and just really really great news. Just two questions regarding the fees. To Councilman Borton's point -- and I appreciate him giving context. I just wanted to understand if the reduction in trail fees is because of concerns or comments that the residents have made or if it is for the benefit of those that have made those contributions -- or just kind of help me understand how that originated. And, then, the second question I have is are -- are these all cumulatively being done with a particular financial goal in mind or are these recommendations made by GreenPlay just to keep up with the amount of use we have had or kind of help me understand -- this is -- is this intended to help fund our capital projects in the past or in the future or is this about what it's costing us to run the course on a daily basis or both? Meridian City Council Work Session December 13,2022 Page 8 of 17 Barton: Yeah. Great questions. Thank you. Simison: Want to answer? Barton: So, the -- Simison: I want Joe Borton to answer the first part, because he unmuted. Borton: The -- I can. Certainly. Simison: I would like him on the trail head -- trail one and, then, you can take the second one to start off with. Barton: Sure. Either way. Simison: Just the -- the historical context on the trail fee is some of the -- the disconnect in years prior -- this is, you know, maybe more than five years ago was, you know, the trail fee was established, but it wasn't, you know, established as a means of, then, segregating those funds and, then, applying those funds, so that the golf cart -- or the -- the paths which were garbage and so over the years and years and years and years and years you had the folks paying the fees and their carts would just get beat to hell and the money would just go in the owner's pocket or go to something totally disconnected. So, there was just no correlation to -- and that frustration grew overtime and so there has been annual pressure to try and remedy, for lack of a better term, the trail fees being artificially high for no purpose other than you have got a captive senior community that you probably could charge a thousand dollars and it's not right, but you could. So, I think this is trying to remedy that historical equity. Barton: Council Woman Perreault and Councilman Borton, those -- our trail fees are currently on the high side comparatively, so -- and -- and it was exactly that, that, you know, it was a -- a way to -- it was -- it was a way to get some revenue and then -- and, theoretically, it was, yeah, if you pay a little bit more we will -- we will fix up the cart paths and I don't think that ever happened in any way. So, now is the time to reduce that fee. But the four percent increase -- so, there was -- there was a total of 83 trail passes sold last year for -- the revenue was 58,000 dollars. So, the -- if we cut that in half, the four percent increase on the greens fees makes up for that lost revenue, so -- and we feel that, you know, just in -- the market will support that, especially with -- you know, the construction project is going to wind down. The --the course is going to look phenomenal. It's going to play good. You are going to have nice cart paths and so with the -- with the goal of, you know, that tier five kind of break even, make a little bit of money thought, that's -- that -- that's -- at least our thinking is that if we are going to -- if we are going to not bring something in that we will try to make it up somewhere else and -- and this is a good one, because it really didn't make a lot of sense. It was artificially high. Simison: And -- and if I could add to that a little bit. And we still have more that we are doing out there. We haven't -- we got to do the employee wage evaluation, which could Meridian City Council Work Session December 13,2022 Page 9 of 17 have a cost to the operations and we have some -- are we also talking about any of the construction projects that we hope to do in the next few months here in this presentation? Barton: Not -- not -- not at this time, but there are -- we are -- there are a couple others, like the clubhouse, some -- some renovation, remodeling in the clubhouse, because it hasn't been touched for -- for years. It -- it's due, so -- and that will be a future conversation. We hope to come back sometime in January. Because we are -- we -- we have the -- what it could look like, but we don't have a breakdown of the cost. So, once we get that we will come back and have a conversation. Simison: Okay. So, at least from --there is still more work to do, but part of my philosophy with working with the Parks Department is I'm -- and I'm supportive of these changes -- with just trying not to change our revenue projections that we are currently into until we -- we still have a little bit more evolution out there at the course to figure things out, to kind of get that long-term plan and, obviously, with the decisions last week on -- was it last week? The weeks are kind of getting -- two weeks ago on the -- the fee recovery model. So, trying to adjust that -- I mean maybe we have more people that now buy a trail pass at a lower rate. You know, we -- we don't know. But it could -- it could happen. I mean I -- I do the math, 300 bucks, go out and buy a used cart. That money change, if you play enough golf you may now consider that. So, could even be a revenue generator. Barton: And you know it's not going to get destroyed with a bunch of potholes. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: The only thing that I would say is don't make the buckets of balls too expensive. That's all I'm saying. You go to some -- and I'm being serious. So, you go -- you go to some of the -- the golf courses around town and it's -- it costs 30 bucks to go hit a large bucket of balls and it's just -- it's -- it's getting -- that defeats the purpose of the bucket of balls. You want people to learn how to play golf. That's how people learn how to play golf. That's how sometimes people are introduced to play golf. So, the only thing on here -- I just wouldn't get greedy on the bucket of balls. It's important that people know and have a desire to come down and practice and play. Barton: Thanks, Councilman Bernt. I -- so, the ten percent is -- a small bucket is six dollars -- would go to 6.50. A large bucket is 12, it will go to 13. So, I -- I think we are -- we are -- we are a long way away from 30 bucks for a large bucket. Simison: Council Woman Perreault, I know you also -- Perreault: Mr. Mayor, thank you. Just one more follow-up question. I -- I think I'm -- what I'm hearing about the -- the overall changes is that it's meeting two goals, which is to fund some of the capital projects, but also some increases in some, you know, seasonal costs. Is it common for golf courses to change pricing in this many categories every year? We Meridian City Council Work Session December 13,2022 Page 10 of 17 have done this for the second year in a row. Is there -- is there anticipation that we will keep making these adjustments for the next few years as we get through and get this all up to where we want it to be or is it normal for courses to change their pricing every year in this many categories? Barton: I would say that -- well, the -- the -- the fees are not covering capital projects, They are covering the operational needs of the course, and in this environment that we are in where prices are -- costs are rapidly changing and wages are inflating, I would say that it's more -- more common or -- or even unusual. I -- I don't think -- I haven't been doing -- doing golf that long, so I was hoping Ryan could be here. He is -- he knows more about the intricacies of the business than I do, but I would say that when costs stabilize we can stabilize any kind of price increases. I mean that -- that would be our goal is to just get it set, let it ride. If -- if there is an adjustment to something up or down, if we are doing it wrong, I mean we are -- we are fine tuning the business. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Oh. Council Woman Strader. Strader: Thanks, Mike. Great job executing on the capital improvement projects. That's awesome. This all makes sense to me. Don't have any issues with any of the changes. Sort of an aside, though, Todd in the Finance Department had sent us an e-mail that they are not going to be sending a monthly reporting of the financial results for the golf course. I don't think we need those monthly anymore. I think what we need, though, is I still would like to see at least a semi-annual, if not a quarterly, sort of like a management discussion and analysis that combines -- here are the operating results of the golf course. Here are -- you know, here is how the business is doing and, then, you know,just some discussion. It's not enough to get it -- so, if you could just convey to Todd or I will send him an e-mail as well, but it's just not enough for me personally to just get it on the dashboard. I like to have the, you know, sort of MD&A background on that. Yeah. To understand how the operations are going, if there are problems. So, I mean at least twice a year if that's okay. Simison: I think we can get -- you know, we will continue to come back probably at least twice the year until we get this dialed in. I think once we are all dialed in and feel good about it, then, it is part of the yearly adjustments on -- or if we ever see a concern. But once we feel comfortable then I think we back up -- but, yeah, we will be back at least once every six months at a minimum. Barton: We are happy to come as often or as little as you want. Just let us know. Thank you. 12. Parks and Recreation Department: Master Plan Update Simison: Thanks, Mike. Okay. So, next item on the agenda, Item 12, Parks and Recreation Department Master Plan update. Mr. Siddoway. Meridian City Council Work Session December 13,2022 Page 11 of 17 Siddoway: Thank you, Mr. Mayor and Members of the Council. I'm going to introduce Art Thatcher, who I think you guys have met enough times to know. His last couple of presentations have been remote through Zoom, but we have him in person tonight. He is also here tonight with James Nichols. Did I get your last name right, James? All right. Also from BerryDunn, formerly with -- known as GreenPlay. But we have been working with them as a company over the past year, as you know, on this master plan update and we are quickly nearing the completion of this plan. We have worked on some extensive public involvement processes, interviews, focus groups, stakeholder meetings. We did the statistically valid public opinion survey. We did an inventory and analysis of conditions on all parks and facilities throughout the system and more recently we have been focused on the cost recovery piece, which was kind of a -- a separate kind of addendum. So, that's been the more recent focus and we presented that to you a couple of weeks ago. The goals and objectives for the plan have been recently updated and we are presenting the draft plan overall to the Parks and Rec Commission tomorrow night, but with Art in town we wanted to take advantage of the opportunity to get in front of you, give you kind of a high level highlights version of that -- the -- the final plan, including some of the updated goals and objectives. We will be taking that, like I said, to the commission tomorrow night, anticipating a -- a formal recommendation to Council following that and us coming back probably in January to seek your approval of the plan. But we wanted to give you the chance to -- to see it while it's in kind of a final draft stage and with that I'm going to turn the time over to Art Thatcher. Thatcher: Thank you, Steve. Mayor, Members of Council. Very nice to see you again. And as Steve said, I'm here to kind of give you an update of how we got here and, then, what the goals and objectives are for -- for the plan. I will run through a lot of these, because Steve kind of hit on the highlights of -- of what we have talked about. So, we are kind of here in this bottom -- we are in the draft final presentation stage. These are all the kind of stages we have -- we have gone through. As Steve mentioned, our kickoff, the survey, our public engagement, the inventory and, then, our organizational assessment through the process and so it's been a little over--over a year kind of working through this process. As Steve said, we were here in November and did public engagement. We had six focus groups with 39 participants. We did interviews with the elected officials and stakeholders. We did a staff SWOT analysis and workshop with them. Did a briefing and got feedback from the Parks and Rec Commission. Did tours of the parks and facilities and, then, held an open forum that was both in person and virtual and we had 18 people attend that and so one of the things that we -- we asked about strengths, weaknesses, new -- new facilities, new -- new amenities and so, then, we --we kind of wrapped that up with top priorities and you can see from the focus groups and the stakeholder meetings that connectivity, a new indoor facility, and rectangle fields to -- to support the needs and, then, land acquisition and -- sorry. And managing growth were kind of those top five priorities that came out of the -- out of the focus groups. We used the information from the focus groups to develop the -- the survey. We did a statistically valid mailed needs assessment survey and -- and, then, once we started receiving responses back from the survey we did an open link survey, so anybody could take the survey and so we had 690 total surveys completed, 312 from the invitation sample and another 378 from the -- from the open link and as we looked at that one of Meridian City Council Work Session December 13,2022 Page 12 of 17 the -- one of the things -- we were here in 2015 and did the master plan in 2015. So, not only were we able to look at the results of this survey, but we were also able to kind of compare those to the 2015 survey and get kind of the -- you know, how the community had changed a little bit. So, one of the questions we asked about were future needs for indoor facilities and you can see that --that community center--the community recreation center in 2015 was the -- the number two top facility and in 2021 moved to the top facility and, then, it took the place of an indoor aquatic facility, which -- this survey came out prior to you all taking over the -- the -- the aquatic facility here in town and, then, followed by that field house and indoor gymnasium space, as well as a performing arts center and an ice rink as kind of those top five. So, we also asked about future needs for outdoor facilities and, again, you can see the -- the comparison to -- to 2015 and parks and -- parks and trails being the number one, both in 2021 and in 2015, and, then, improvements to -- to your park amenities being that -- that number two and, then, shade structures and parks. In 2015 shade structures were -- were really number two. However, over -- over the period you have added shade structures within many of your parks and so it's still a priority, but kind of dropped down to that number three, followed by playgrounds and, then, lights to your outdoor athletic facilities and rounding out that top five. So, one of the things that we ask is, you know, given a hundred and in five dollar increments how would you spend that hundred dollars. You can see that compared '21 to 2015, that additional pathways was number one in -- in -- in this survey, but in the 2015 expanding your aquatics indoor and outdoor was number one. Again, I think that reduction stems from you -- you acquiring the -- the outdoor swimming pool. That number two in both was making improvements to existing and renovating your existing facilities and -- and parks. So, as -- as Steve mentioned, we also did your inventory and level of service analysis. So, from 2015 to today we --we updated your-- your inventory, looked at all of your parks and looked -- and looked at all the components within those parks and did an inventory of those. We also looked at other service providers and, then, we also looked at the inventory and schools. So, really getting a -- a really great picture of all of those -- those recreation amenities that are available to the community. We also looked at HOA and private facilities within the system -- within the city. So, again, as we -- we were able to look at 2015, so your population grew from 94,000 to 124,000. Your -- the -- the city limits, you know, grew from 18,000 acres to 23,000 acres and your number of parks went from 21 to 25 over that period. So, we do an atlas. So, we provide GIS of your parks and, then, we look at all the amenities in there and we do a quantitative analysis of -- and a qualitative analysis of those and provide that in a booklet to the department and electronically, so that they can keep up with the -- with the inventory. Some of the kind of -- some of the things that came out of our inventory site visits were your parks are very consistent across the board. They are very well maintained to a very high standard. Restrooms are -- in our opinion some of the cleanest that we have seen in a system around the country. We have noted that most of your parks have public art and, then, that you have -- you have added additional bike repair stations to many of your parks. Your turf is in really good condition and that there seemed to be a very high priority to -- to planting trees in many of your parks. So, your urban forestry is a -- is a high priority, which was one of the things that came out of the 2015 master plan. So, this is just a -- we GIS all of your parks and all of the amenities within that. We also added in the schools and the -- and the HOA parks within the system. We -- one of the things that we look at Meridian City Council Work Session December 13,2022 Page 13 of 17 is walkability. So, that ten minute walk to -- to a recreation facility. The -- the -- the yellow is -- is -- meets a five component park and, then, the yellow is that it's still -- you still have walkable access, but it's below that five components within the park. So, the -- the great thing and -- and what should be really celebrated is that really a hundred percent of your community has walkable access to some recreation component from their homes. So, we -- we, again, kind of look at that neighborhood access and begin to kind of look at the Meridian parks alone and, then, adding in the schools and the HOAs and, again, you kind of see that -- still that hundred percent, but, really, 91 percent are within a -- that ten minute walk to an outdoor recreation component within their -- within their neighborhood. So, we take all the data and -- and everything that we have collected and we develop recurring themes and so those recurring themes are continuing to create a connected community through your pathways development, maintaining the quality of maintenance level, level of service and funding for your parks and facilities, finding future locations for parks to stay ahead of your future development, which you are doing through your-- your -- work with your developers. Keeping up with future changing demographics, as they -- as growth occurs. Looking at a -- a new community center, recreation center within the community. That was one of the greatest needs identified for an -- for an indoor facility. And, then, your pathways and trails was identified as the -- the greatest need and desire for outdoor facilities. Again, shade structures and communication were the top two areas that if addressed would increase participation in parks. Communication piece being knowing where the parks are and knowing what -- what activities and facilities are going on there. And, then, we asked about how people would like to receive their information on parks and programs and services and e-mail and social media were those two top two. So, kind of looking at that -- that communication piece. So, we take those and we begin to -- working with staff develop goals and objectives and so we have four goals, like we did in 2015, and so continuing to improve your organizational efficiency is the first goal and we have six objectives and, then, there are a number of actions steps that fall under each one of these objectives that you will see when you get the draft of the master plan. So, maintaining your existing level of service goal of four acres per -- per thousand residents. Enhancing and improving internal and external communication. Maintaining existing quality standards for your facilities and amenities. Utilizing technology to improve customer service and efficiencies. Increasing potential partnerships to -- within the community. And, then, staffing appropriately to meet demand and maintain existing quality of service, both on the recreation side, as well as on the park side. So, the second goal was maintaining and improving your facilities and amenities and we have -- like with 13 objectives within this one and it's -- it's really kind of the -- it is the largest of all of those. So, maintaining and improving your existing facilities, expanding your pathways and your connectivity, adding indoor recreation space, developing new amenities -- that new and existing parks. Acquiring new land for -- for parks. And, then, evaluating your parking at parks events and scheduled activities. So, the -- the second half, continuing to monitor your-- your ADA needs within the community. Since the last plan you developed an ADA transition plan and, really, you have taken care of all of those -- those issues in that transition. So, now it's just monitoring, keeping up with that. Upgrading your comfort convenience and customer service amenities. Shade would fall under -- under this objective. The number nine, kind of creating park identities in your existing and new parks. So, continuing to kind of look at, you know, how you are -- you are -- you are Meridian City Council Work Session December 13,2022 Page 14 of 17 infusing unique components within your parks to create identities. Addressing current and future needs for athletic fields. Consider programming needs when adding new components to existing parks and -- and developing new parks. Maintaining component --the component based inventory and level of service analysis. That's the --the inventory that I showed you earlier and, then, you continue to -- to maintain your life cycle replacement plan. So, make -- make sure you are continuing to -- to keep that up. And, then, the --the third goal is really -- is around continuing to improve programs and service delivery and that's really to continue to address recreation programming, activity needs in the community. The department does a really good job of reaching out to the community, getting satisfaction surveys back and -- and working on those. So, there are several actions that are underneath that. And the final is the -- to help increase your -- your financial opportunities. And so looking at those opportunities to increase your special events and activity sponsorships, evaluating your impact fee ordinance, pursuing grants and philanthropic opportunities and, then, implementing the cost recovery and pricing policy that -- that we did for you as part of this. And so those are the -- the goals and objectives and kind of how we got there and I'm happy to answer any questions that you might have. Simison: Thank you, Art. Council, questions? Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Art, thank you very much for the update and hope you are enjoying our wonderful weather. Thatcher: Absolutely. Perreault: Yeah. So, what are -- are there any specific updates -- let me rephrase that. Are there any specific goals and objectives and/or action tasks that are new to the plan that didn't exist before or any -- any that significantly changed? Thatcher: No. I think the -- you are -- the -- the first plan was -- was pretty broad. I think there are some actions that are -- that have changed some or maybe new actions, but the goals and objectives are -- are pretty common and -- and pretty -- broad enough that they encompass a lot of those actions. Some have taken greater priority, like maintaining what you currently have, because your system has grown. So, making sure that you are continuing to maintain those have taken a greater priority than -- than they did at first. When we were here in 2015 a lot of the system was new and so, you know, there -- there wasn't a lot of need to -- to kind of upgrade those facilities. So, now making sure you are keeping up with -- with new trends, adding new components to parks and those things to keep them interesting and -- and attracting users. Perreault: Mr. Mayor, one more question. Meridian City Council Work Session December 13,2022 Page 15 of 17 Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: What are the top two or three things that you think we should take from this update and do differently or implement sooner or that we should shift our priorities on from the original plan? Thatcher: Well, the -- the number one is maintaining what you currently have, because you do have --your--your system is now starting to kind of get in that--that aging process and so make sure that we are -- you are keeping things current, keeping them well maintained. That's what keeps people going. That's what also continues to attract new residents into the community is those new parks. Continuing to increase your-- your park acreage and your--and -- and your amenities within those parks as the community grows. It doesn't necessarily mean that you need to -- you need to buy new land, but as you work with your developers having them, you know, provide recreation components within their HOAs, within their developments, so that -- so those residents are -- are getting that same use. I think those are kind of two of the top. And, then, continuing to -- to connect the community through -- through your pathways. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Art, it's great having you in person. Appreciate you being here. Thatcher: Thank you. Cavener: I love your guys' surveys, because they are statistically valid and it gives me real confidence about where we should be allocating our resources and so this -- this question is not a -- an arrow at the data, because I -- I really validate it and I appreciate it. But as a Council Member the things that are listed as priorities are not things that I hear from our citizens that they need or want. The things that I'm hearing about is farmland preservation, nature preservation and so help me understand -- do you -- do you see similar trends in other parts of the country where maybe it's a -- it's a vocal minority that want this thing, but it never bubbles up on a survey. Is that something that your -- how does your survey kind of contemplate those unique things that maybe a city hasn't offerred, that citizens haven't thought about. Are those questions included in -- in your survey and -- and what I'm trying to do is to parse what I hear, you know, versus what we see in the survey and I will give you a great example. When I very first got elected I met a guy in a park who wanted to talk to me about this weird sport coming out called pickleball. Right? And so -- that was 12 years ago. And now -- and now we have got -- we are -- we are investing in pickleball all over the place. He -- he was on the cutting edge of what he felt that our community needed and I don't -- I don't want to discount where these citizens are coming from, but it also -- those types of things don't necessarily show up on a survey until people are maybe frustrated that it doesn't exist. Meridian City Council Work Session December 13,2022 Page 16 of 17 Thatcher: And -- and I think we do infuse into the survey some national trends that see -- we see around the country. You know, I mean disk golf courses are, you know, being constructed, you know, all over the country. It's one of the top things that communities are investing in, as well as pickleball courts and some of those things. So, we do infuse some of that into -- into the surveys. Also we don't just use the -- the survey responses when we start making our recommendations. We look at national trends. We --you know, we consider what we heard from the --from the focus groups. What the focus group does is in -- in a lot of cases we will have very enthusiastic users that will show up, you know, to -- to focus groups to -- to give their opinion and so, you know, we get a lot of, you know, skate park users that come to the focus groups. Pickle ballers that come to the focus groups. The first project I did in Wake Forest, North Carolina, the first focus group I did there were 50 people and sitting in the -- in the front rows and they all had on lime green Wake Forest pickleball T-shirts and so, you know, they were -- you know. And that was, you know, ten years ago and -- and so, as you say, they were kind of on the cutting edge, but they became proponents to the whole master plan and I think we see that here as well, is that, you know, we -- we hear those enthusiastic citizens that -- that want things and so we did hear preserving open space as one of those priorities. We did not ask specifically about agricultural land. In like the -- the state of Maryland they -- as part of their master plans for state funding they -- they require an ag section within their land preservation plans, their parks and recreation land preservation plans and so, you know, that's one of the states that we work in that we do -- specifically do ask about ag land. Cavener: Thank you. Thatcher: You are welcome. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Thanks, Art. I appreciate it. I -- I do think if -- if the final plan or the final report could have kind of an overview of emerging trends I think that would be really helpful. I -- I agree with Councilman Cavener, I think it's good for us to also have a view kind of leading into the future of what's emerging. Like I hear a lot about parents and even insurance companies wanting to see kids have riskier playgrounds. That's something going on in Europe that I have heard about. Not dangerous playgrounds, but playgrounds were kids can kind of learn what their limits are and -- and developmentally it's important for them. Just things like that. If -- if there are new trends that we should be aware of would like to hear about those. Thatcher: And -- and so as you read through the -- the final plan you will see that as we -- as we do recommendations there is also a plan and there is also parts in there about emerging trends within the industry. That -- that's a part of that. So, you will see those throughout. Meridian City Council Work Session December 13,2022 Page 17 of 17 Simison: Council, additional questions or comments at this time? All right. Well, thank you very much, Art. Thatcher: Thank you all very much. It's good to see you again. Siddoway: I will just wrap it up by saying we appreciate the feedback tonight very much. We will go to the -- the commission and hope to be back before you next month to conclude this process and request your adoption of the final plan. So, thank you very much. Simison: Thank you, Steve. Council, we have reached the end of our agenda. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I move we adjourn our work session. Simison: Have a motion to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:31 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 1-3-2023 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 1-3-2023 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: C-Shell Starbucks 2022-0026 Water Main Easement ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2022-098682 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=6 VICTORIA BAILEY 12/14/2022 09:47 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2022-0066 C-Shell Starbucks 2022-0026 WATER MAIN EASEMENT h THIS Easement Agreement, made this 13t day of December, 20 22 between t r l G ("Grantor"),,and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); ' WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a'water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor,and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS'A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS 'EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures,trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: STATE OF IDAHO ) Next Page ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on (date) by (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: (type of authority such as officer or trustee) (stamp) Notary Signature My Commission Expires: Water Main Easement Version 0 1/0 1/2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of YOLO y On 01 DECEMBER 2022 before me, VICKIE S. REYES, NOTARY PUBLIC, (insert name and title of the officer) personally appeared MARK L ENGSTROM who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. VICKIE SI RREYES WITNESS my hand and official seat. w COMM. #2423030 z ZNotary Public•California o YOIo County Carom.a i Oct 23.2G2b Signature (Seal) WATER EASEMENT CITY OF MERIDIAN/IDAHO MUN CORP. GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 12-13-2022 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 12-13-2022 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 12-13-2022 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature 3-28-2028 My Commission Expires: Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 UT ® THE ® GATEWAY (` LANGDON MAPPING GROUP INC. J•U-8 ENGINEERS,INC. J-U-8 FAMILY OF COMPANIES EXHIBIT"A" ENGSTROM PROPERTIES CITY OF MERIDIAN 10-FOOT-WIDE WATER MAIN EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A water main easement located in a portion of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a Brass cap marking the northeast corner of said Section 15,from which a Brass cap marking the north quarter corner of said Section 15 bears South 89°15'23" East, 2,640.72 feet; Thence S09°03'32"W, 386.23 feet on a random line to the west right-of-way line of South Ten Mile Road; Thence S00°11'38"E, 81.11 feet on along the west right-of-way line of said South Ten Mile Road;Thence S89°58'25"W, 181.83 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the easement to be described; Thence continuing South 89°58'25" West, 10.0 feet; Thence South 00°35'24" West, 10.0 feet; Thence North 89°58'25" East, 10.0 feet; Thence North 00°35'24" East, 10.0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 100.0 square feet, more or less. This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. OAP` LAND Jo J. e , PLS 15528 4? "G1STJ `SG� 11-50-Zoz.Z Date CV/0 9Tf �P P ,y j tl_30'7-OZ2-, Page 1 of 1 2760 West Excursion Lane, Suite 400,Meridian, 1D 83642-5313 www.*ub.com 208.376.7330 EXHIBIT "B" W. Franklin Rd. Basis of Bearings S.10 1/4 S89'15'23"E 2640.72' S.10 S.11 S.15 7 S.15 S.14 I � a� I � I � r r 0 10 SCALE IN FEET CV J POINT OF BEGINNING — — ----- — — — L4 L3 IJ JI L6 LINE TABLE Al— —� NO. BEARING DIST. L1 S9°03'52"W 386.23' L2 SO°11'38"E 81.11' LAND L3 S89°58'25"W 181.83' COD `�� ° G L4 S89°58'25"W 10.00' � o L5 SO'35'24"W 10.00' �O9TF OF \�P�P L6 N89°58'25"E 10.00' j • S L7 NO°35'24"E 10.00' Il_ 30_ �p2?i CITY OF MERIDIAN ,B WATER MAIN EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHEET SITUATE IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 15, T3N, R1 W, 1 OF 1 b 1•U-B ENGINEERS,INC. BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: TM Crossing Subdivision No. 4 Water Main Easement No. 1 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2022-098683 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 VICTORIA BAILEY 12/14/2022 09:47 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2022-0265 TM Crossing Subdivision No 4 Water Main Easement No. 1 WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made this 13th day of December 20 22 between BVASB Tea Mile office Buiid;ng No s ILLc ("Grantor"), and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures,trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: BVASB TEN MILE OFFICE BUILDING NO.6,LLC,BY ITS OPERATIONS MANAGER, BVA DEVELOPMENT,LLC J.Thomas Ahiquist STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on ! ( 2. (date) by _J•Thomas Ahlquist (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of BVASB Ten Mile Office Building No.6,LLC (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: Operations Manager (type of authority such as officer or trustee) (stamp���u+r.,���` ••••••q��� 4D�,,,��i,� N tary Signature 4F. Rp � .�� My Commission Expires:_ Z� • �OTAR y �saw • w Z PUBLIC 14 '•.,,�fUF��4•� Water Main Easement Version 01/0I/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison,Mayor 12-13-2022 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 12-13-2022 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 12-13-2022 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 2775 W.Navigator Drive,Suite 210 Meridian,Idaho Office Meridian,Idaho 83642 H O RRO C K S Tel: 208.895.2502 www.horrocks.com Fax: 208.463.7463.756161 11-11 E N G I N E E R S ANAL EifSF Date: November 8, 2022 1 Project: ID-2240-2002 11-08-22 Page: 1 of 1 OF EXHIBIT AoN WRtG TM CROSSING SUBDI VISION NO.4 WA TER SER VICE EASEMENT This easement is situated in a portion of Lot 15, Block 2 of TM Crossing Subdivision No. 4, located in a portion of the E. '/2 of the S.W. '/4 of Section 14, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the southeast corner of Lot 15, BIock 2 of said TM Crossing Subdivision No. 4; thence along the south boundary of said Lot 15, 1) N.89°1 1'04"W., 25.47 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, thence continuing along said south boundary 2) N.89°11'04"W., 20.00 feet, thence leaving said south boundary; 3) N.00°48'27"E., 55.09 feet, thence; 4) N.89°11'04"W., 3.09 feet, thence; 5) N.00048'27"E., 20.00 feet,thence; 6) S.89°11'04"E., 23.09 feet, thence; 7) S.00°48'27"W., 75.09 feet to the south boundary of said Lot 15 and the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXHIBIT "B" LEGEND: t - J 0 CALCULATED POINT LOT LINE N ,' EASEMENT BOUNDARY LINE N.T.S. P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT ffs L L.AIy a N O s_ 11-08-22 �qrF of � tK, az w'��Gr °�� J m f S89'11'04"E N 23.09' wa � I NO°48`27"E 20.00' LOT 16 LOT 15 w o o N89°11'04"W W Ln 3.09' I cv o V 0 v 0000 9 O to �{ ,a, cc z N z CO 3 00I - O 0 m CD P.O.C. 132.78' 20.00' 25,47' E N89'11'04"W 178.2 0 P.O.B. W. NAVIGATOR DR. R=962.50' D=90029'20" C D=230.79' d CB=N45° 33'49"E 2 DRAWING INFO EXHIBIT "B" WATER SERVICE _ATE 111 '22 r' SCALE NITS 75 21 EASEMENT B 2775 West Navigator Dr.,SUlla 210 TREv x OATE Meridian,ID 83642 Y TM CROSSING SUBDIVISION N0.4 SEE1dSHEETFORUSTINGa m I KIN pHFROJ.No: ID-2240-2002 F ¢ lff ?31Qrtt... _ iris . E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Plat for Gander Creek South No. 3 (FP-2022-0026) by Kent Brown Planning Services, generally located south of W. McMillan Rd. on the south side of the Five Mile Creek, west of N. McDermott Rd. STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY N -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING 12/13/2022 DATE: MI `11A Y'AJ T12w TO: Mayor&City Council t� FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner � � 21SE29 ro 208-884-5533 .Fivemile'Cm``ek'-Q1�:' SUBJECT: FP-2022-0026 Gander Creek South Subdivision No. 3 W LOCATION: Generally located south of W. McMillan _----- Rd. on the south side of the Five Mile =- -- Creek,west of N. McDermott Rd.,in the NE 1/4 of Section 32,TAN., R.1W. 7: U'h'1'HEE HIUH I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat consisting of 75 single family residential building lots and 10 common lots on 13.77 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district for Gander Creek South No. 3. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Kent Brown,Kent Brown Planning Services—3161 E. Springwood Dr.,Meridian,ID 83642 B. Owner: Open Door Rentals, LLC— 1977 E. Overland Rd.,Meridian,ID 83642 C. Representative: Same as Applicant III. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat(H-2019-0013—Gander Creek South Subdivision)in accord with the requirements listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. Because the number of buildable lots is one(1)fewer and the common area is greater than shown on the approved preliminary plat, staff deems the final plat in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. IV. DECISION Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat within the conditions noted in Section VI of this report. Page 1 V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(dated: 5/13/2019) VVELUUML'Y PLAT 8.1; - - - -- - -' - - - - I,,i�r�a 1•l,rex���ssc�um�icu Tt - H � '..4 � .lam y,L�--�1• 7.�� ___,_ -__ ___ _ i — mn� ,��• is 4, .+,r' �_ -f1 _._ _c_�_._` __ y� I!I � l I w.�•+L + � sa�.� N% r7� r1 �-� ;r�ln�r r -r_.�S - i �i�-.v -..xrzrnsa a+riff,ixc r•I.a a wrr�rafter,r.�� � ws tiw ,'.+. - - ni�Al'dY 5-Rife-.*F •.• - - .ruL..ire r-u.n.ieLrrc-�ry rc-.R�r a �� cCLl in 1' cLszT Page 2 B. Final Plat(not dated) PLAT SHOWING G ATER CREEK SOUTH SUBDIVISION NO. 3 LoeATED IN me Ne(/a OF SECTION 32,T.4N., R.1W.,BOISE MERIDIAN.CITY OF MERIDIAN,ACA COUNTY.ICAHO MCMlunlq Rp_- $ e 2022 32 33 NOTES: 1, A ten(16)foot wltle Pressure Irrigotlon Eoaanent In fowr of the Gander Creek FiyE 4!r Homeowners Associollon and a Permanent Public Utllllles ontl Property 01.r-ge Easement la M1ereby deaignatetl along o11 lot lines comet n to a Pabllc RipM1l-of-Way ol1 rear of Imes A lire(5)loot wide Pudlle C{illtiea and Property N13'07.44-E 134.93'� 52'18-p�8 Cralnege Easement le M1ereby dealgnated slang each aMe of In terror let Ilnea unleaa atherviae shown. r 10 11 12 9 -� 2. Pardon.of Lots 10.11.15.17 8:I8,Block 11.Lot 11,BIOW 12 and all of Lot 12. 13 ilocN 12 ore servient to and contain the RCHD Storm Water Urelnage Syate'n.These 14 15 -i ale ore encumbered h,ihot certain Fimt amended Noster Perpetual Storm Wotar Cralnoge Easement recorded an November 1G,2015,as Inalrument N.. 147552,Ww 35,7a' �- 17 2015-tU3258,Uffaial Rb-ds of Ada County,and incwporvted herein by this GANDER CREEK SOUTH -� ,P O 19 M7B84'18'ly'�_ terence oa it set rorth in NII(the"Minter Easement)The Master Ea seen ant and 9J RUI VI5101J NO.2 19]�qu C8 I 34z.]2'`�-„ Lhe storm Wotw D,,I,,ge Syltem ore dedfwted to AOHO p.-M to sectroo BOOK- PACE f Ea Go 40-- SEX N13'07'05'E 157M �'� 20 -23U2 mnbC.-me Master sement Is for:ne Cpemtlon antl Molnfen.n«o ma sm.n water Drainage system. O 23 22 21 21 I 3. Any Re-Subdr,lslon of thla Plat h,II be In-plm-with the most recently 20 h apR-d 5,bd1rf.1cn StandaNs of the City of M.ridian- N]6'SY55"W 52U5' 71 19 1B q 22 I Y i 4, ihla devdopment recognizes Idaho Code Section 22-4503,right to form act.or Q ' atot,,:'No agria Iturd operation,agrimi l f,011ty pr eCDpnalm thereof shall be come a be a npieanc p,W. r ppblic,by any changed ondi Tiona in or bl,ao the r ding nano till obU lles oH.'it hoe bean operation for mare than I ID 11 1$ 13 O 24 I a UNPLATIEO ens{1)year,xhe the np.,b,n,facility er eapenalen w a net a nulan"ce nt the +Y lime It it began er vas c°nstructed.The prevlslms of this sectlpn shell net apply o i 15 19 17 Q 25 O�i N wnen a nuiaenre reeulta Imm kha improper or negligenk opem[ion o£en ogricuNural opxo[1.n,agrirul[urol 1.cility or ewp.neion theeol" - gint enanm of my r D Irrigatign erainage pipe r Ditch c sing I,t is the a S]59759 E 1U].70' �1 �" $(��-��Y( � �n�a 5 M reaponaihility ch-Fc lot owner unless aucM1 reap nsibillLy ie assumed by cn N14'S2'C2"E 47.00' L1 1 �'� I�z 27 I no Irrigotim/Droinogc Cistrict. 5]SU7'S6"E aS.03' - 0 ® ;¢ 8- Irrigation wotm tes been providetl by Nampa&M ridian Irr[potion DiatRct in S89'26'14'E �2 -� q�m compliance xit n doFo Cme Section 31-3R05(1)(h)_Lois w in[ne subai.si n xiI 38,1 - �1 EET 3 O ' Na659'19'W 19773' be entitled to hrligotion Wotx Rights,and will be Obligoted�for AsaeaEmenta from _ Nampa k Meritllan IrrlgeCon Cislrict. N00'33'46'E - APpAN O I O1'00'47"E 2499' i� g 7. Lots 9 k 22.Black 2.L Block ot 13.Block 7,Lot 14. a.Lot 14.Black 9,L.I.10 k 1 U5 w 3 4 D --� �m 17.Block 11.Loh Block 12&12.Bl 12 and Lot 1.Ulmk 13 are common lot which NBa'5913'W O 104.a4' shall be Iwnetl and malntpinetl by the Gander Greek Hanepxner' ssec s Rietlm,All NO3'21'48'W O 10 Q 0 JI� amnion ale arc eubpck!o o blanket public sillily easement cnd irrigation wirwi 2D.05' z Q' easement 9 O 11 12 13 w �56 ntV3'33'a6'E � O m I' e. AC Permpnenl[asement-See Incl.Na CHD om 107.09'�0S O O O O O O 4 ti O I o UNPL-D 111 City efLl g Merltllon Water k Se rre Ea cement See Inet N.. Die L 9,Block 2 con oin a Nem a W Meridian Imigwl on krick E"se o! menk 1"r 14moi,%na of thek 9.MIIe CC ek as shown. N01'12'39'E N:REO j 3 12- vbc01.n 0esisting Ingress/.press egsement-See Inst,Na-_--_-_ 47IX1' 0D , 531'32'00'E 17.93 13. The bollam elewtlon i°II structur°I fa°tinga at,, be sal a minimum of 12-lochs �1 O k DR 75'OT58'E 2.14' above the highest established normal grosnd water eiewtian- N0T129.08 O O O ] --_ 14. Portlens of the sl,bdIVlI.n are Iocaled wlthln the TEMA determined special Flood Hazard Zone-A'and Zone"„"per Flnn Panel Ni 16001C0140J.effective dote �- _- 70 O O ID G19"52'C2"W 97.U0' G nd.11 land fl S/1'/ 2 e pp-oa.oda wn o hereon.Flood Zones are.e bred to change by ploi.ie requlo[ed by the tlty o1 Meridian N75bT,�w�- 1 _ 12 r� 75n759'w 29.Og' 32 33 . Be73_.4 _ mr.nx - t45Y02'ri 132.0 ggealsE u�, �µPL tee, i .�mrr�r ceN L RCHUKAR RIC LEGEND CE NOTE: St1B0IM9aN No,f ------- ngsnr SEE SHEET 4 OF a 11779 a soedvsax eau w ° BOON 122 PAGE 19397 skenpq LNI: wr uwc FOR LINE 8 CURVE Di'Fa r [ur.w Tn Hw TABLES 3yN f aye _.._.._.._..._.._ nvA rinm Nwao NCGP uev(sFF ugra.•1 SHEET 1 OF 6 dN• unqu edcra sea•nq oat° 6 �ulm J235g' 9g,41' •pu' S673,'IJYd t11va1' Table 100 0 50 100 200 9 Mw Ixuu uw tsss'zs'Nr nw `ee f '° SCALE IN FEET ubusnc crP lsinnN �Xiley Engineering,Inc. aw.P s,�pp^ 1"=100' O ens°�'a/eari" o,n"r�e".sr�"n.,fn CR'ILENOINEERINGIPL4NNINGICADU t aeo' M.rEs.o Tfi�_aem wx..w+a1n�.�nm13n Page 3 GANDER CREEK SOUTH SUBDIVISION NO- 3 L P^ I - % ' sou LEGEND �'E"agov - xE.l W.x ___-__ I.s„orem jl �_ ® she�® �.•` d �� r � ,,,, '--.� r_ � p ,�,:�aa� HIM M P IS ®,o.oa—�4 �i ® '`O£:®$8g®.god ! __ `66 F�¢I-B_®•_-_ig Id (—_� YL ®rt „IDS I SCALE IN FEET + s"® `fIls I 11779 xooas uwTw FNRCT 5 R'�__ o r_�_ uATa 9RaTe�to_J���"p xeess to w,aT.n O sae SHEEP P OF 6 �ailey Engineering,Inc. NOTE: CrvIL EXOINEER IX6nPL5HXIXGI CFUD SEE SX EFT 1 OF S FOR NOTES.SEE SHEET , OF 6 FOR LINE TE CURVE TABLES GANDER CREEK SOUTH SUBDIVISION NO- 3 ,a — xiauorE w.ao'�a>sn� ERrz •"s Ilk �'... X"A. ON t•, umz �I iT Xx o sxp ��._. IIILo ___ _ N 0�09 89 l.` iNi uaA AarO N. LEGEND nT'x�'ae• ------------- si T's g^o keyy tt„ a T—^o'd$p HIM ______ aw/n OO f ce,, �J cif y� g o d 8 g 1 • c o,�,,.rz E, ru 11 uxssa,xmwsexohn nanzas•e az.00• __ _� �~ � ��;s - 5`Po'/ ®ffi ®� __-___ea.°"_oo__ g�� �/- - so o zs so mo SCALE IN FEET .` g,y O Nr 4gy0j r---- r s tf ns= CHUKAR RIDGE SHEEr a OF a SUBDIVISION NO. 1 alley Engneering,Inc. NOTE: CIVIL EXCINEE0.1NGnPL1XNING�CARD SEE SHEET 1 OF S FOR NOTES.SEE SHEET , Page 4 GANDER CREEK SOUTH SUBDIVISION NO. 3 C.—7.N. L bII Ll —IN F� —1 lllwwl SHEET 4 OF 6 alley Engineering,Inc. NOT SEE SHEET 1 BE 6 FOR NOTES.SEE SHEET ��IILLN!1141ERING'PLANNING'M OF 6 FOR LINE&CURVE TABLES Page 5 C. Landscape Plan(dated: 07/19/2021) gg'd — 3Ri GANDER CREEK NORTH aPl � a FrvE Mrtg cPr�x ✓ �`E J i!- EXISTING GANDER .I EXISTING GANDER - - - w GREEK SOUTH - `I CREEK. SOUTH L 1 =17 c PHASE 1 I PHASE 2 I� oj,. __[[ 'JJJ GANDER N�•' CREEK I &, SOUTH I per, k =j,' - - - --- - --------- - PHASE 3 3 O�' q � a Fz- z IJ EXISTING GANDER L 2 0 w c CREEK SOUTH W Y x LT-�- — PHASE 2 j w a I J H LLD u MCFADO�N DRAIN LL � O J � J w NOTES S a d [p °` ? r Page 6 Ib F1 ar z z IA Lj 4 m > C) vv CNEMEM11 MATC[AJME LI MATCHLM LI wryr "-JJLW777�7, 717 Rr NOMS �` „ ., Q W In w > KCrMM ZL L 1 -Ij Z< F MLTS F. Page 7 PLANT SCHC—C%)Lr= W—N M. 111 VINYL PRIVAGY FENCE Al IAIIII 1 TREE PLARTIHG/5TAKINe Al LIJ z O SHRUB PLANTING W z GONGRETF NOI5F ABATEMENT WALL U 0 m Ld C) D q Ld 1—�1� T� --IILI—11 11-1 Il- V) I—T -I-Tpoll. LANDSCAPE OALCLJLA71ON5 a. _j rl- 0 u < z H,PERMOT-r RO(HAM1(,)LANDSCAPE BUFFER < WROUGHT IRON FENGE JENEENBELTS Page 8 VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development (H-2019-0013; DA Instrument Number#2019-060657). 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the subject final plat within two years of the City Engineer's signature on the previous phase final plat,or apply for a time extension,in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. Gander Creek-North and Gander Creek South preliminary plats are allowed to develop as one project in accord with the phasing plan for the overall development, per the DA. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by Bailey Engineering,Inc. by Cody McCammon, included in Section V.B shall be revised as follows: a. Note#8: Include the recorded Instrument Number for the ACHD Permanent Easement. b. Note#9: Include the recorded Instrument Number for the ACHD License Agreement. c. Note#10: Include the recorded Instrument Number for the City of Meridian Water& Sewer Easement. d. Note#12: Include the recorded Instrument Number for the vacation of the existing ingress/egress easement. e. Revise Lot 12,Block 11 to comply with the minimum 30-foot wide street frontage requirement in UDC 11-2A-3B.1,measured as a chord measurement. £ All buildable lots shall have a minimum 40-foot wide street frontage, except for properties with street frontage on cul-de-sacs or at approximately a 90-degree angle,which shall be a minimum of 30 feet,measured as a chord measurement; correct all lots that don't conform. 5. The landscape plan prepared by Jensen Belts Associates, dated 05/27/2022,included in Section V.C, shall be revised as follows: a. In the Landscape Calculations table, include the required vs.provided number of trees along pathways that demonstrate compliance with UDC 11-3B-12C.2. b. Depict a 6-foot tall berm with a 6-foot tall wall on top of the berm as noise abatement along the east boundary of the site adjacent to future SH-16 as required by City Council at the hearing on May 28,2019 in accord with set forth in UDC 11-31-1-41)for residential uses adjoining state highways; also modify the detail for the berm. The plan currently depicts a 4- foot tall berm with a 6-foot tall concrete wall. c. A detail shall be included that depicts the centerline(or estimated centerline)of the future SH-16 in relation to the top of the berm/wall verifying it's a minimum of 12-feet higher than the elevation at the centerline of the state highway as required by UDC 11-3H-4D.2. The Director may approve alternative compliance as set forth in UDC 11-5B-5 where the Applicant has a substitute noise abatement proposal in accord with ITD standards and prepared by a qualified sound engineer as set forth in UDC 11-3H-4D.4. d. The 6-foot tall closed vision fence along the east boundary of the subdivision adjacent to N. McDermott Rd./future SH-16 shall be removed and either a use easement recorded across the Page 9 back side of the berm along McDermott/SH-16 benefitting adjacent building lots with allowance for side yard fences to be constructed to the wall on top of the berm; or, an open vision,4-foot tall closed vision, or 4-foot tall closed vision with 2 foot open vision fencing on top could be constructed for visibility of the common area between the fence and wall on top of the berm. 6. The existing ingress/egress easement(Inst. #98106235) for W. Lazy Diamond C Lane and an Idaho Power easement(Inst. #8958920) and any other easements that are no longer needed shall be relinquished and/or vacated, as applicable,prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer on the phase in which they are located. The Applicant shall submit copies of the easement relinquishment(s)and/or proof of vacation of the easement(s)with the final plat application as applicable. 7. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer,the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster, Sue Prescott, at 887-1620 for more information. 8. The rear and/or sides of structures that face future SH-16 (i.e. Lots 20-21 and Lots 23-28,Block 2) shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation (e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. 9. Install signage at each end of the alleys for addressing purposes for lots that front on mews. 10. All existing structures are required to be removed prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat for the phase of development in which they are located. 11. All stormwater detention facilities counted toward qualified open space are required to be designed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-11 C. 12. All fencing shall comply with the standards of UDC 11-3A-7C. 13. A floodplain development permit is required to be obtained from the Public Work's Department prior to any and all development within the floodplain. 14. The Five Mile creek,which lies on land owned by Nampa&Meridian Irrigation District along the northern portion of this development, shall be protected during construction. 15. All homes constructed shall be generally consistent with the conceptual elevations included with the development agreement(Inst. #2019-060657). 16. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions: 1. The geotechnical investigative report prepared by SITE Consulting, LLC indicates some very specific construction considerations. The applicant shall be responsible for the adherence of these recommendations to help ensure that groundwater does not become a problem within crawlspaces of homes. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay the Oaks Lift Station and Pressure Sewer Reimbursement Fees in the amount of$265.25 per building lot. The aggregate amount of the reimbursement fees for the entire preliminary plat area must be paid prior to city signatures on the first final plat. Page 10 3. The applicant shall be required to pay required to pay the Oaks Lift Station Pump Upgrades Reimbursement fees in the amount of $185.43 per building lot. The aggregate amount of the reimbursement fees for the entire preliminary plat area must be paid prior to city signatures on the first final plat. 4. Ensure no sewer services pass through infiltration trenches. 5. Ensure no permanent structures (trees, bushes, buildings, carports, trash receptacle walls, fences, infiltration trenches, light poles,etc)are built within the public water/sewer easement. 6. Ensure there is proper 25 feet horizontal separation between retention pond and water main. 7. A water main connection must be made to the existing 12' water main south of the McFadden Drain. 8. Property removed from SFHA through LOMA 21-10-1997A. General Conditions: 9. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 10. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 11. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer,an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 12. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 13. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 14. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 15. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for Page 11 more information at 887-2211. 16. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements,prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy,a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 17. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 18. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 19. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 20. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 21. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 22. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 23. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 24. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans.This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 25. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 26. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 27. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility,or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x I I" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed,and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. Page 12 28. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 29. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development, and if so, how they will continue to be used, or provide record of their abandonment. 30. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 31. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (UDC 11-313-6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 32. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Page 13 W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law for Alden Ridge Subdivision (H-2022- 0059) by Dave Yorgason, Tall Timber Consulting, located at 6870 N. Pollard Ln., and (3) parcels to the north and east, directly east of State Highway 16 and south of the Phyllis Canal at the northern edge of the Meridian City Impact CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI N:- , AND DECISION&ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Annexation of 24.8-Acres of Land with the R-4(20.35 Acres) and R-8(4.45 Acres)Zoning Districts; and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 65 Building Lots and Ten(10) Common Lots on 21.7-Acres of Land for the Alden Ridge Subdivision,by Tall Timber Consulting. Case No(s).H-2022-0059 For the City Council Hearing Date of: December 6,2022 (Findings on December 13,2022) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6,2022, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6,2022, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6, 2022, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6, 2022, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019, Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR ALDEN RIDGE H-2022-0059 - 1 - 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6,2022,incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for annexation and zoning and preliminary plat is hereby approved with the requirement of a development agreement per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6, 2022, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I- 6B-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s)and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR ALDEN RIDGE H-2022-0059 -2- A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(d), if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(a), an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted, including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67, Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(l)(d) and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6,2022 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR ALDEN RIDGE H-2022-0059 -3- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 13th day of December 2022. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER TREG BERNT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E.Simison 12-13-2022 Attest: Chris Johnson 12-13-2022 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 12-13-2022 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR ALDEN RIDGE H-2022-0059 -4- EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT C: E IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 12/6/2022 Legend DATE: Project Location TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Joe Dodson,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: H-2022-0059 Alden Ridge Subdivision ------ LOCATION: 6870 N. Pollard Lane and the three(3) parcels to the north and east,directly east of SH 16 and directly south of the Phyllis Canal at the northern edge of the Meridian area of City impact,in the NE _ 53 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 21, Township 4N, Range 1 W. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Request for Annexation and Zoning of approximately 24.8 acres of land with a request for the R-4 (20.35 acres)and R-8 (4.45 acres)zoning districts and a Preliminary Plat consisting of 65 building lots and 10 common lots on approximately 21.7 acres of land in the requested zoning districts,by Dave Yorgason, Tall Timber Consulting. NOTE: The Applicant has also requested Alternative Compliance to the required landscape buffer requirements adjacent to State Highway 16; the Director has approved this request per the analysis in Section V and the findings in Section IX below. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage AZ—24.8 acres; PP—21.7 acres Future Land Use Designation Low Density Residential(LDR,up to 3 du/ac Existing Land Uses County residential Proposed Land Uses Detached Single-family Residential Lots(#and type; 75 total lots—65 residential building lots and 10 bldg./common)) common lots Phasing Plan #ofphases) 2 phases Number of Residential Units 65 single-family units Density Gross—2.97 du/ac. Pagel Description Details Page Open Space (acres,total Approximately 3.18 acres of open space proposed [%]/buffer/ ualified) (approximately 14.4% Amenities Four(4) amenities are proposed—swimming pool, picnic area,pathway network, and dog waste stations. Neighborhood meeting date May 26,2022 History(previous approvals) No application history with the City B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Yes • Requires ACHD No Commission Action es/no Access Access is proposed via new local street connections to Pollard Lane,an (Arterial/Collectors/State existing street(partially private and public)at the southwest corner of the Hwy/Local)(Existing and property. Pollard Lane accesses SH 20/26 through a future public road access Proposed) southeast of the site(N. Rustic Oak Way). Access to all proposed homes is shown from new internal local streets. Stub No existing stub streets.Applicant is proposing two stub streets with this Street/Interconnectivity/Cross project; one to the east boundary and one to the southern boundary. Access Existing Road Network No, except Pollard Lane and Old School Lane,private streets. Capital Improvements Meridian North:Bikeway Signage/Community Improvement project is scheduled in the IFYWP Plan/Integrated Five Year to include establishing new bikeway corridors with wayfinding/bikeway signage,from N.Black Cat Road, crossing State Highway 20/26/Chinden Boulevard to N. Long Lake Way Work Plan construction in 2026. Black Cat Road is listed in the CIP to be widened to 5-lanes from McMillan Road to Chinden Boulevard between 2036 and 2040. The intersection of Black Cat Road and Chinden Boulevard/US 20126 is listed in the CIP to be widened to 5-lanes on the north leg,5-lanes on the south,7-lanes east,and 7-lanes on the west leg,and signalized between 2026 and 2030. The intersection of Star Road and Chinden BoulevardIUS 20I26 is listed in the CIP to be widened to 5-lanes on the north leg, 5-lanes on the south, 7-lanes east, and 5-lanes on the west leg,and signalized between 2031 and 2035. Fire Service • Distance to Fire 3.3 miles from Fire Station#5. Station • Fire Response Time The project currently lies outside of the Meridian Fire response time goal of 5 minutes. Future development of public roads may assist in reducing response times in this area. • Resource Reliability Fire Station#5 reliability is 85%(above the goal of 80%) • Accessibility Proposed project meets all required road widths and turnaround dimensions but requires a secondary emergency access to construct more than 30 homes. Water&Wastewater Page 2 1 1 1 - • - • .. � ' Celle la Irve J ��, - - _ -= ■�_- all 1.1 . o - 1 W � - • r - j nnum �11111\lII llllll 111• I�- Irri,: _a nnmml J liti 3, • n 11 6� 11 3 �� '-_ o ljlw �I :mnun•�iit mw mnumnn�__�-e e- '� �1,� llllll llllll � -111111 llllll��• -` - 11.111111� -■ . III.111111 �� • � � 11.11114 -_ �� •�.�.�� I11.111111� I ' II111111111 I • � /////( 111111111111111111 CHINDEN 111111111111111111 ��i■ �~ IIIIIIIIIIIIIII llllll .......� 11111 IiaaGi. 11111 nn_e,Inllln 2` � f, �f ��Ul:>Ir1__,nuun IIr -Ili 1117 n iii mrr 1:tl qlq ,p' 'hnry/ =.IGiGIN .m 1j- U J:re_=nu= U1•:11:, �unno all.- �.�,�- Ia -_-nu �� =�•• 1 m�.��Ii11111Y� i� _11111■iiiii-`'�mm����-�Illjn�„ =�I111111Y� y I � 11 y I nm n111111111111 IIu1111�-_.� {��_ n Irr� _ 1: . . IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIr�llrrnrrr■ - = W ..... 1 1 , • , 11 B. Property Owner: Kyle Enzler,Ryenn Holdings,LLC—2610 E. Jasmine Lane,Meridian,ID 83646 C. Representative: Same as Applicant IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper Notification 10/19/2022 11/20/2022 Radius notification mailed to properties within 500 feet 10/13/2022 11/17/2022 Site Posting 10/23/2022 11/28/2022 Nextdoor posting 10/13/2022 11/18/2022 V. STAFF ANALYSIS A. Future Land Use Map Designation(https://www.meridiancity.org/compplan) Low Density Residential(LDR)—This designation allows for the development of single-family homes on large and estate lots at gross densities of three dwelling units or less per acre. These areas often transition between existing rural residential and urban properties. Developments need to respect agricultural heritage and resources,recognize view sheds and open spaces, and maintain or improve the overall atmosphere of the area. The use of open spaces,parks,trails,and other appropriate means should enhance the character of the area. Density bonuses may be considered with the provision of additional public amenities such as a park, school, or land dedicated for public services. The subject 22 acres is located at the northern edge of the Meridian area of city impact(AOCI) and includes four(4) county parcels containing three(3)rural county homes. The largest home located at the northeast corner of the project is proposed to remain while the other two homes are shown to be removed upon development of the site. The subject site abuts SH 16 on its west boundary and the Phyllis Canal along the entire north boundary which limits any connectivity to the north or west. To the east, two county residential parcels exist and will remain with their new access being to the south through an approved development(Pollard Subdivision). South of the subject development is the aforementioned Pollard Subdivision that is zoned R-8 directly abutting the site and C-G south of that; this development was approved as a mixed-use development consisting of residential and flex space/commercial uses. The subject property is designated as Low Density Residential on the future land use map consistent with surrounding large lot development to the north and east and is a transition from the mixed-use designations along Chinden/SH2O126 to the south. The Applicant is proposing 65 building lots on approximately 21.7 acres of land which constitutes a gross density of 2.97 units per acre, near the maximum density allowed within the LDR designation. The Applicant is proposing two zoning districts within the development to better transition from the R-8 zoning to the south R-8 zoning is proposed along only the building lots abutting the south boundary with the remaining area proposed with the R-4 zoning district. The minimum building lot size proposed is approximately 5,500 square feet which exceeds the 4,000 square foot minimum lot size for the R-8 zoning district along the south Page 4 boundary. Within the R-4 area, the minimum building lot size is approximately 8,000 square feet, at the minimum lot size for the zoning district(there are a number of lots along the perimeter of the project that exceed the minimum lot size requirement). To further help transition from the development to the south, the Applicant is proposing a 30 foot wide buffer with a walkingpath along the entire south boundary; Stafffinds this buffer and the proposed zoning designations to be an adequate transition from south to north. The adjacent county parcel to the east is approximately 4.6 acres in size with the home located on the east third of the property, approximately 230 feet from the east property line of this project. In addition, the submitted plat depicts a total offour(4) building lots and a stub street along the east boundary. One of these lots is a large estate lot while the other three comply with the minimum lot sizes of the requested zones. Because of the proposed design and the location of the existing county home, stafffinds the proposed site design offers adequate transition to the east. The Phyllis Canal and SH 16 are located wholly outside of the subject project boundary so no direct transition is required as these features are delineations themselves. However, due to the anticipated noise from SH 16, some form of transition and/or buffering should occur along the west boundary.According to the submitted plans, 6 building lots are proposed adjacent to the shared west property boundary with the one remaining home located at the very northeast corner of the site. Code requires a minimum 35'landscape buffer from this project to SH 16 which is shown on the submitted plans. Therefore, the rear lot lines of the proposed homes are no closer than 130 feet to the edge of the pavement for SH 16 and future homes should be even further from the highway after setbacks and building placement are included. Stafffinds proposing less lots along this boundary should minimize the number of homes most affected by any noxious effects from the highway. The proposed development is located at the north edge of the City's AOCI with an approved but undeveloped project to its south as its path to annexation and public street access.Access to the site is a main point of discussion and analysis with this project and timing of development is integral to its success because there are currently no public streets constructed to the subject development from existing public roads. There is existing right-of-way(ROW)from the subject -- - tl .v : �_ �• ,F,. - .. :LA Q0.,OBIIVISIOH ® � YEJHIBIT - - ------ - ----- ------------- - - - 11 Page 5 site to Chinden but no physical road within the ROW. This will persist until Brighton constructs Waverton east-west through their site and connects to Pollard Lane at the west boundary.According to the Applicant,Alden Ridge will connect to Pollard Lane with Brighton's first phase of development for its required public street access but full construction (curb,gutter, and sidewalk) of the Brighton owned segment of Pollard will not occur until phase 2;phase 1 of Pollard Subdivision has received final plat approval and does not include the noted segment of Pollard Lane(see blue box below): The roads outlined in black in the exhibit above are part of Pollard phase I and have received final plat approval whereas the roads outlined in red would be part of phase 2 and have not received final plat approval.ACHD has stated within their report that they will not approve any final plat for Alden Ridge until a public road(Waverton Drive) is constructed to the project for access(see Exhibit VIII.H). Therefore, this development is contingent upon the construction of the adjacent project to the south. Commission and Council should determine if development of this project constitutes orderly growth and satisfies the Comprehensive Plan and City code despite being contingent upon another development for access and sewer infrastructure. Staff recommends a DA provision around the timing of development consistent with ACHD and UDC 11-3A-3 for access to the project. Further analysis is below in subsequent sections. The City may require a development agreement(DA) in conjunction with an annexation and rezone pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A.In order to ensure the site develops as proposed with this application, Staff recommends a DA that encompasses the land proposed to be annexed and zoned with the provisions included in Section VIII.A1. The DA is required to be signed by the property owner(s)/developer and returned to the City within 6 months of the Council granting the rezone and annexation approval.A final plat will not be accepted until the DA is executed and the AZ ordinance is approved by City Council. B. Comprehensive Plan Policies(https:11www.meridiancity.o- Icompplan): The applicable Comprehensive Plan policies are cited below with Staff analysis in italics. "Encourage a variety of housing types that meet the needs,preferences, and financial capabilities of Meridian's present and future residents."(2.01.02D). Staff finds the proposed design to develop this site with two large estate lots, a majority R-4 development, and a transitional row of R-8 lots promotes a diverse set of housing options that should meet the needs,preferences and financial capabilities of future residents. "Establish and maintain levels of service for public facilities and services,including water, sewer, police,transportation, schools, fire, and parks" (3.02.01G).All public utilities are not currently available for the project site due to its location being at the north rim of the City's AOCT Specifically,Alden Ridge is dependent upon Pollard Subdivision to the south for sewer and public road access. There are anticipated and approved improvements in this area that will provide City sewer to the property with Brighton constructing a lift station with phase I of Pollard Subdivision; water will be provided to the project from Veolia (Suez) Water and not the City of Meridian. In conjunction with the timing of utility development,ACED has noted they will not approve a final plat for this project without a public road being constructed to the subject site. This future connection should occur with phase I of the Pollard Subdivision to the south where an existing segment of Pollard Lane resides within public ROW and will connect to the new east- west road, W. Waverton Drive. Staff has concerns regarding the construction timeline for the required public road access to Alden Ridge. Staff finds the existing development does not provide for appropriate levels of service for this project but the planned development of the immediate area should create appropriate conditions Page 6 for levels of service to and for this proposed project. Staff has included provisions regarding the timing of this development with the noted and anticipated hurdles. "With new subdivision plats,require the design and construction of pathways connections, easy pedestrian and bicycle access to parks, safe routes to schools, and the incorporation of usable open space with quality amenities."(2.02.01A). The proposed project will construct sidewalks within the entire development and extend public roads to adjacent underdeveloped county parcels for future connectivity. There are no nearby schools but the submitted plans show adequate pedestrian access to the proposed open space and amenities within Alden Ridge. Future public road connectivity will also allow for easy and safe pedestrian and vehicular access to commercial development planned along Chinden Boulevard, SH 20126 to the south. Staff anticipates both customer and employment opportunities to be nearby the subject development. "Require new development to establish street connections to existing local roads and collectors as well as to underdeveloped adjacent properties."(6.01.02C). The Applicant is proposing to construct new local streets within this development that stub to underdeveloped properties to the east and provide connectivity through the mixed-use project to the south, Pollard Subdivision. However, as discussed, the timing to establish these street connections is not entirely clear due to the project to the south not currently being complete and no existing public road connection to Chinden exists. The Applicant is coordinating with the adjacent developer to the south but the fact remains Alden Ridge development is directly tied to the development of Pollard Subdivision to the south for public road access. For this reason, Staff supports the internal circulation and the proposed stub street locations but has concerns regarding the overall connectivity to nearby roadways and their timing of construction. Staff finds this development to be generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan but notes the important access deficiencies that exist at this time. C. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: According to GIS imagery,there are three(3) existing homes and several outbuildings within the project boundary. Staff understands the home located in the northwest corner of the site, located on the proposed Lot 13,Block 1, is to remain while the other two homes and outbuildings will be removed. In addition,there is a private street(W. Old School Lane)that exists along the entire southern boundary and provides access to the two county parcels to the east, 6854 and 5500 W. Old School Lane. According to City GIS imagery, it does not appear that this private lane is within the subject project boundary but has confirmed with the Applicant that it is in fact within the property lines. Further analysis on this is below in the Access section. Located at the southwest corner of the property,there is currently a cul-de-sac for Pollard Lane that was utilized when it was a private street;this cul-de-sac now has public right-of-way over it as it is intended to provide public street access to this development. However,the cul-de-sac and a large area of the existing right-of-way is not needed anymore as the design of this project has shifted to the east to accommodate a future Veolia(Suez)Water well site(Lot 5,Block 1)where the cul-de-sac is currently located. The remaining area of the right-of-way that is no longer needed will be vacated at a later date with ACHD; the Applicant should provide the City proof that the right-of-way has been vacated with the submittal of the first final plat application. D. Proposed Use Analysis: The proposed use is detached single-family residential with a minimum lot size of approximately 5,500 square feet and an average lot size of approximately 6,000 square feet,based on the submitted plat(Exhibit VII.B). This use is a permitted use in the requested R-4 and R-8 zoning Page 7 districts per UDC Table 11-2A-2. The Applicant has noted the development is expected to develop in two phases with a majority of the development occurring within phase 1 (48 lots in phase 1 and 17 in phase 2). Staff supports the proposed phasing plan because it includes a majority of the open space,pedestrian and vehicular connectivity, and both zoning designations. No common driveways or alleys are proposed within this development. E. Dimensional Standards(UDC 11-2): The residential lots are shown to meet all UDC dimensional standards per the submitted plat.All lots are shown to meet the minimum lot size and minimum street frontage requirements for each zone. In fact,nearly all of the lots within the subdivision are proposed to be larger than the minimum lot size and with at least 10 more feet of frontage than code requires for each zone. For example,the R-8 lots are shown with at least 50 feet of frontage (40 feet is required)and the R-4 lots are shown with at least 70 feet of frontage, except one lot that is proposed with 65 feet of frontage (60 feet is required). In addition,the subject development appears to comply with all Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards outlined in UDC 11-6C-3. F. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): The Applicant submitted conceptual building elevations for the proposed detached single-family homes.Note that detached single-family homes do not require Design Review approval,therefore Staff does not review these for compliance with any architectural standards. The submitted elevations depict a number of different architectural design variations of both farmhouse and modern style homes. The homes are depicted with varying roofprofiles, building materials, and window designs.All of the images depict some form of side-loaded garages which allows the streetscape to include more building fagade instead of being garage dominated. Overall, Stafffinds the submitted elevations to show high quality and attractive detached single- family homes. However, there is concern the submitted conceptual elevations depict homes that will not fit on the R-8 lots so Staff is requesting additional elevations that are confirmed to fit on the proposed R-8 lots. Page 8 G. Access(UDC 11-3A-3, 11-3H-4): As discussed within the Comprehensive Plan section above, access to the subject site is concern of Staff due to the required timing component and the fact the subject development is wholly dependent upon development of Pollard Subdivision to the south. Existing ROW exists from Chinden to the southwest corner of Alden Ridge via a small segment of Pollard Lane(a previous private lane)but most of this ROW does not include any road at this time. Pollard Subdivision No. I is approved and will include the extension of W. Waverton Drive from the east within Fairbourne Subdivision. The below image depicts the ROW(shown in pink)versus the actual location of the existing roadways(gray asphalt)with the overlay of the planned improvements (burgundy lines): � unKCPo Ci:. - I W HIHLrNI FAL\[1R 3 3. — r 9 _ W rgrvnsmR� — �I W WAVERTOH❑R � z 3 w3 Once Waverton is constructed with Pollard Subdivision No. 1,ACHD will approve the phase 1 final plat for this development, according to their staff report. Beyond the noted access from off-site,access for the development is proposed via a new local street(shown as W. Scoria Court) connection to Pollard Lane at the southwest corner of the property.All building lot access is proposed to internal local streets shown as 33 feet wide within 47 feet of ROW,consistent with ACHD standards. Further,two stub streets are proposed; one to the east property line and one to the south property line. The stub street along the south property line is planned to be extended by Pollard No. 2 in the future but will be constructed as a temporary secondary emergency access from Waverton to the new local street with phase I of the subject development. This secondary access is required by the Meridian Fire Department in order to construct more than 30 homes. The stub street to the east property line will be extended in the future should the adjacent underdeveloped county parcels ever redevelop. In addition to access for the properties within the subject application,W. Old School Lane is also the access to the two county properties east of the subject site. The Applicant has shown an alternative access for these properties by maintaining a portion of Old School Lane along the Page 9 south boundary that connects to the proposed stub street to the south boundary;this access is proposed to remain until such time that phase 2 of Pollard Subdivision develops to the south and constructs a public road to the east terminus of Old School Lane as their permanent access, as approved with the Pollard Lane Subdivision preliminary plat. All of these improvements are noted within the access exhibit in Exhibit VILD below. H. Parking(UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table II- 3C-6 for single-family dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. Staff will confirm compliance with these standards at the time of building permit submittal for each residence.Note that there is opportunity for on-street parking where there are no driveways because the internal streets are proposed as a 33-foot wide street sections. Further, due to the relatively low density and wide building lots,there should not be number of driveways placed close together that limit on-street parking typically seen within higher density developments. I. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-17): A combination of 5-foot wide attached and detached sidewalks are proposed along the internal local streets consistent with UDC and ACHD requirements.No multi-use regional pathways are required or proposed within the development as the Phyllis canal along the north property line is not located within the project boundary. The Applicant is also proposing micro-paths throughout the site for access to the proposed open spaces and Staff specifically notes their inclusion within linear open space along the south boundary as well as within between the row of homes in Block 2 that runs north-south and adds a pedestrian loop between two local streets. The proposed sidewalks and micro-paths comply with UDC standards;therefore, Staff is supportive of the proposed pedestrian network of Alden Ridge Subdivision. J. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): There are no collector or arterial streets adjacent to the subject development so no street buffers are required that are typical in most subdivisions. However, a portion of the west project boundary abuts ITD right-of-way for SH 16 and requires a 35-foot landscape buffer per UDC 1I- 2A-5 for the R-4 zoning district as it is depicted as an entryway corridor(no portion of the R-8 lots abut this right-of-way). The required buffer should be landscaped per the standards in UDC Table 11-3B-7C and UDC 11-3H-4 because it is adjacent to a state highway. In addition, all landscape areas should be landscaped per UDC 11-3B-5,the general landscaping standards. Lastly, according to the submitted plans,the Applicant is proposing micro-paths which should be landscaped in accord with UDC 11-313-12 standards. The Applicant is showing a common lot along the west boundary that is 20 feet in width and does not comply with the required width of 35 feet. Due to the existing location of the home and mature trees, a required easement by the water company along the rear of the building lots, and the relative limited number of homes along the highway(6 building lots), the Applicant has requested Alternative Compliance (ALT) to the location of the buffer and its required width on the subject property—the Applicant is not requesting to reduce the actual buffer width but to shift it over the west property line so that 20 feet is on the subject property and 20 feet is within the ITD right-of-way.According to the submitted narrative, the Applicant states that ITD has approved the inclusion of landscaping within their ROW as they have excess area that will not be used for future road widening. In addition, ITD has included additional requirements surrounding the approval of the proposed buffer location;for example, the requirement for ITD to be able to access any SH 16 landscape areas from within the subdivision and not along the highway for safer access. Staff is supportive of this request because the actual buffer width Page 10 proposed is S feet larger than the minimum requirement, it will allow for existing mature vegetation to remain, and allow for a wider berm and more dense landscaping to be placed along this frontage offering more noise and fume mitigation than if the buffer was solely on the subject property. Specific ALT findings can be found in the findings section of this staff report, see Section LY As discussed above, the required 35 foot landscape buffer is due to the SH 16 frontage being an entryway corridor. Per UDC 11-3B-7C.3, entry way corridors require additional landscape design than typical landscaping. For example, additional vegetative ground cover beyond that of grasses and additional landscape features are required to meet UDC standards. Landscape features may include berms at a three-foot minimum height, decorative landscape walls, decorative open vision fencing, or a dry creek design with river rock, boulders, etc. are acceptable to meet this standard. The Applicant is proposing trees in excess of code with the combination of a berm and wall but there is no exhibit depicting the style of the wall and no other elevated landscape features are proposed. In order to comply with the entryway corridor standards, the Applicant should add additional features as outlined above; Staff has included a condition of approval to comply with this standard. As discussed, the Applicant has proposed linear open space and micro paths around and through the development. These areas should be landscaped in accord with UDC 11-3B-12 with trees at least every 100 linear feet and include other vegetative ground cover. According to the submitted landscape plans, the Applicant is proposing trees in excess of code requirements with sod throughout; additional vegetative ground cover is required in accord with UDC 11-3B-12. The Applicant should revise the landscape plans to depict the required revisions with the relevant final plat applications. The Applicant is also proposing a relatively short segment ofparkways near the north end of the site in front of Lots 14-22,Block 1.According to the submitted landscape plans, the proposed parkway includes one tree per lot and is 8 feet wide, consistent with UDC requirements. K. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. According to the submitted landscape plans, the Applicant is proposing two types of fencing throughout the site, vinyl privacy fencing and vinyl semi privacy fencing, in addition to proposing a masonry wall at the top of the berm along the west boundary adjacent to SH 16. Staff finds the locations of all of the proposed fencing to comply with UDC requirements. However, the type of semi private vinyl fencing shown within the submitted landscape plans do not comply with the exhibits depicted with the UDC that requires the solid portion to be no more than 4 feet in height and the top 2 feet must be at least 80%open-vision. The Applicant is required to revise this type of fencing shown on the submitted plans with future final plat applications. In addition, the Applicant is proposing a berm/wall combination along the SH 16 frontage at the northwest property boundary and notes the wall to be approximately 4 feet in height with a 4-foot to 5-foot tall berm; therefore, the combined height of the berm/wall is approximately 8-9 feet in height. UDC 11-3H-4, development along state highways, is applicable in this area of the project because of the frontage with SH 16. Code requires the berm/wall combination to be a minimum of 10 feet above the centerline of the highway. Therefore, the applicant should revise the height of the proposed berm and wall to comply with the UDC. Page 11 L. Open Space and Amenities(UDC 11-3G): The proposed project is approximately 21.7 acres in size requiring a minimum amount of open space based on the requested zoning. Per UDC Table 11-3G-3,the R-4 area requires a minimum of 12%qualified open space and the R-8 are requires a minimum of 15%open space. Because both zones are located within the same project,it is anticipated all of the open space is to be shared and the total open space required is based on the calculations of combining the minimum required. Per the calculations,the minimum amount of qualified open space required is 2.77 acres,approximately 120,661 square feet. According to the submitted plans,the Applicant is proposing 4.1 acres of common open space with 3.18 acres of this area as qualified open space, exceeding the minimum amount required. The proposed 3.18 acres equates to approximately 14.4%qualified open space for the overall project. There are three main open space areas proposed within Alden Ridge, the centralized common open space area, the linear open space along the southern boundary, and the linear open space in the west half of the site with Block 2. The large central open space area is approximately 52,000 square feet in size and is the largest common area within the project. The Applicant has proposed multiple micro paths throughout this open space for easy pedestrian access. The linear open space along the southern boundary is approximately 30 feet in width and over 1,000 feet in length. This linear open space is shown with trees and a micro path for an added pedestrian element and will also act as a buffer between this project and the project to the south, Pollard Subdivision, that is approved with higher density housing than what is being requested with Alden Ridge. The other areas noted as qualified open space include half of the buffer area to SH 16 and a portion of the future well site lot at the southwest corner of the project that is at least 5,000 square feet in size. Both of these areas are allowed to count towards the qualified open space per the UDC. Because of the pedestrian connectivity and the general locations and uses of the open space, staff supports the proposed qualified open space. UDC 11-3G-4 dictates the minimum amenity points required for projects over 5 acres in size. The project size of 21.7 acres requires a minimum of four(4)amenity points(1 point for every 5 acres). According to the submitted plans and narrative,the Applicant is proposing the following amenities worth 9 amenity points: a picnic area(2),pathways(2),two dog waste stations (1), and a swimming pool(4). According to UDC Table 11-3G-4,the proposed amenities and their point value is correct and exceed UDC requirements for a project of this size. Consistent with the overall design of the open space, the Applicant has proposed to place the swimming pool with changing facilities and a picnic area near each other and within the large centralized open space lot, Lot 13, Block 3. The two dog waste stations are located in separate areas of the site for ease of access to both the east and west half of the project. Lastly, the proposed micro paths are located throughout the development and add multiple pedestrian connections through the project that are not located adjacent to the street. Based on the proposed site design and zoning, Staff supports the proposed amenities. A Utilities (UDC 11-3A-21): The Applicant is proposing and is required to extend sanitary sewer services to adjacent parcels to the east for future connectivity.No other connectivity options are available due to the Phyllis Canal located along the entire north property line and a segment of SH 16 along a portion of the west boundary.Water service for this project will be provided by Veolia(Suez)Water and not the City of Meridian. Public Works has reviewed the subject plans for compliance with their standards and finds them to be in general compliance except for specific conditions outlined in Section VIII.B of this report. Page 12 As discussed throughout this report, sewer service for this development is not yet available and must be provided to this site via construction of the adjacent development to the south, Pollard Subdivision. Further, a lift station is also required to service this area for both Pollard Subdivision and this subject development,Alden Ridge. In short, the subject development is wholly contingent upon the construction and completion of the adjacent project to the south. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation and preliminary plat applications with the requirement of a Development Agreement per the conditions of approval in Section VIII of this report per the Findings in Section IX of this staff report. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on November 3,2022.At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject Annexation and Zoning and Preliminary Plat requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Dave Yorgason,Applicant Representative; John Peterson,neighbor, b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Dave Yorgason; John Peterson; d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Joseph Dodson,Associate Planner f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons,Planning Supervisor. 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. Support for project due to proposed density and general lot sizes; 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: A-. Fencing questions re ag rding lots surroundingopen space areas; b. Commission supported the proposed density and lot sizes because they saw the proposed project to provide adequate transition and would blend in well with the existing character of the neighborhood. 4. Commission change, (s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstandin issue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. None C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on 12/06/2022.At the public hearing,,the Council voted to approve the subject AZ and PP request. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Dave Yorgason and John Peterson b. In opposition:None c. Commenting: Noted above d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Bill Parsons f. Other Staff commenting on application: Joe Bongiorno 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Fire response times. b. Timing for the construction of the infrastructure(well lot, sewer lift station, and public street extension)to serve the proposed development. Page 13 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. None Page 14 VII. EXHIBITS A. Annexation and Zoning Legal Descriptions and Exhibit Maps: ACCURATE SURVEYING SURVEYING & MAPPING s£q P 0 Job No.22-197 Annexation Description A parcel of land lying in the Southwest Quarter of Section 21,Township 4 North,Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the found 2 inch aluminum cap monument in asphalt at quarter corner common to Sections 21 and 28,T 4 N,R 1 W from which the found 2 inch aluminum cap monument in asphalt at the corner common to Sections 20,21,28 and 29,T 4 N,R 1 W,bears N 89'27' 17"W a distance of 2609.48 feet;thence N 89'27' 17"W along the section line for a distance of 1304.74 feet to the west sixteenth corner common to Sections 21 and 28;thence N 00'34'56"E along the sixteenth line for a distance of 1317.29 feet to a found 5/8 b inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463 at the southwest sixteenth corner of Section 21 and the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence N 89'27' 18"W for a distance of 25.00 feet to the centerline of N.Pollard Lane; Thence N 00'29' 13"E along said centerline for a distance of 365.15 feet; Thence N 89°30'47"W along said centerline for a distance of 33.33 feet; Thence S 83'33'30"W along said centerline for a distance of 55.00 feet; Thence S 85'48'43"W along said centerline for a distance of 36.25 feet to a found aluminum cap monument on the southeasterly right-of-way of State Highway 16; Thence N 68'56'21"W for a distance of 155.65 feet to the centerline of State Highway 16; Thence along said centerline 770.84 feet along a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 10,000.00 feet,a central angle of 4°25'00"and a long chord bearing N 28'30'55"E a distance of 770.65 feet; Thence S 60'34'55"E for a distance of 159.30 feet to a found 4 inch brass cap monument on the southwesterly line of the Phyllis Canal; Thence along said line the following 8 courses and distances: 1.) along a curve to the right 60.81 feet,said curve having a radius of 340.00 feet,a central angle of 10°14'52"and a long chord bearing S 74'09'59"E a distance of 60.73 feet to a found 5/8u'inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; 2.) S 670 00'00"E for a distance of 244.90 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; t 1520 W.Washington St.,Boise,ID 83702 Phone:208-488-4227 www.accu ratesurveyors.corn Page 15 ACCURATE SURVEYING $ MAPPING t S£q u t t' Job Ito.22-197 3.) S 67°00'46"E for a distance of 47.31 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; 4.) S 61°59' 06"E for a distance of 202.70 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a plastic cap labeled PLS 5710; 5.) S 53°06'27"E for a distance of 109.48 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a plastic cap labeled PLS 5710; 6.) S 520 52'46"E for a distance of 107.17 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a plastic cap labeled PLS 5710; 7.) S 66°52'05"E for a distance of 184.95 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a plastic cap labeled PLS 5710; 8.) S 700 40'30"E for a distance of 112.43 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a plastic cap labeled PLS 5710; Thence S 00'31' 50"W for a distance of 557.08 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a plastic cap labeled PLS 5710; Thence N 89'27' 18"W along the sixteenth line for a distance of 1164.95 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 24.802 acres,more or less. 11463 ; OF N J.QE`� 2 1520 W.Washington St., Boise,ID 83702.Phone:208-488-4227 www.accuratesurveyors.com Page 16 EXHIBIT MAP ANNEXA TION �s 2P�5 t k63 LYING WITHIN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 21, T.4N., R.1W., B.M. COUNTY OF ADA STATE OFIDAHO rO Ayy< �h S6717D'00'E s 44 /244.90 P�5 tiP�'53t11463 C��< LEGEND S6159'06 E S 66 52'05" E ANNEX BOUNDARY SCALE: 1"=300' �P 202.70' 184.95' —— SECTION LINE _ PARCEL LINE R/w R/w— RIGHT—OF--WAY 109.48' ` — CENTERLINE x 5525246 E FOUND 4" BRASS CAP '107.17 1 11D R/W MONUMENT 57040'30 E FOUND 2" ALUM, CAP MONUMENT, L 112.43 STAMPED PLS 8961 s N0365�15 E • FOUND 5/8"IRON PIN, 3 LABELED PLS 5710, / 24.820± AC. OR AS NOTED N 8927'18" W CALCULATED POINT / 25.00, I o P.0.6, POINT OF BEGINNING R.o.e.—J N 8977'It; W 1154.95' AND dSW 1116 CORNER PLS 7146J oRNER N 00 34'56"E 1317.29' 20 21 1304.74' 8- 1304_2674'�_ 21 � 114 6 3 29 28 w 1116 —— N 89 27'17 W 09.48' LINE TABLE CORNER BASIS OF BEARING 114 CORNER 9 LINE BEARING DISTANCE STATE HWY 20/26 N9�/AN J.DPaG L1 N 89'30'47" W 33.33' L2 S 83'33'30" W 36.25' Y r f 9lb 0 ACCURATE S 85'48'43" W 36.25' Z � C L4 N 68'56'21" W 155.65' L5 S 60'34'55' E 158.30' '� j SURVEYING & MAPPING L6 S 67'00'46' E 47.31' s �` r.. 1520 W.Washington Si. CURVE TABLE t Boise,Idaho 83702 (208)488-4227 CURVE I ARC LENGTH RADIUS DELTA ANGLE CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH www.accuratesurveyors.com C1 1 770.84' 1 10000.00' 4'25'00" N 28'30'55" E 770.65' fR V 1 CE C2 1 60.81' 340.00' 1 10'14'52" S 74-09'59" E 60.73' DATE:JUNE,2022 JOB 22-197 mmmi Page 17 ACCURATE � '�► �. SURVEYING & MAPPING 'It R V I t'' Job No.22-197 Zoning R4 Description A parcel of land lying in the Southwest Quarter of Section 21,Township 4 North,Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the found 2 inch aluminum cap monument in asphalt at quarter corner common to Sections 21 and 28,T 4 N,R 1 W from which the found 2 inch aluminum cap monument in asphalt at the corner common to Sections 20,21,28 and 29,T 4 N,R 1 W,bears N 89'27' 17"W a distance of 2609.48 feet;thence N 89'27' 17"W along the section line for a distance of 1304.74 feet to the west sixteenth corner common to Sections 21 and 28;thence N 00'34' 56"E along the sixteenth line for a distance of 1317.29 feet to a found 5/8'inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463 at the southwest sixteenth corner of Section 21;thence N 890 27' 18"W for a distance of 25.00 feet to the centerline of N.Pollard Lane;thence N 00'29' 13"E along said centerline for a distance of 163.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence N 00'29' 13"E along said centerline for a distance of 202.15 feet; Thence N 89'30'47"W along said centerline for a distance of 33.33 feet; Thence S 830 33'30"W along said centerline for a distance of 55.00 feet; Thence S 85'48'43"W along said centerline for a distance of 36.25 feet to a found aluminum cap monument on the southeasterly right-of-way of State Highway 16; Thence N 68'56'21"W for a distance of 155.65 feet to the centerline of State Highway 16; Thence along said centerline 770.84 feet along a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 10,000.00 feet,a central angle of 4°25'00"and a long chord bearing N 28'30' 55"E a distance of 770.65 feet; Thence S 60'34'55"E for a distance of 158.30 feet to a found 4 inch brass cap monument on the southwesterly line of the Phyllis Canal; Thence along said line the following 8 courses and distances: 1.) along a curve to the right 60.81 feet,said curve having a radius of 340.00 feet,a central angle of 10' 14' 52"and a long chord bearing S 74'09' 59"E a distance of 60.73 feet to a found 5/8'inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; 2.) S 67°00'00"E for a distance of 244.90 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; 1 1520 W.Washington St., Boise, ID 83702®Phone:208-4884227 R www.accuratesurveyors.com Page 18 Qt� i rfC ACCURATE z y � v Z - SURVEYING & MAPPING �PA< 'rFR v 10 Job No.22-197 3.) S 67°00'46"E for a distance of 47.31 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; 4.) S 61°59'06"E for a distance of 202.70 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a plastic cap labeled PLS 5710; 5.) S 53°06'27"E for a distance of 109.48 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a plastic cap labeled PLS 5710; 6.) S 520 52'46"E for a distance of 107.17 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a plastic cap labeled PLS 5710; 7.) S 66°52' 05"E for a distance of 184.95 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a plastic cap labeled PLS 5710; 8.) S 70°40'30"E for a distance of 112.43 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a plastic cap labeled PLS 5710; Thence S 00'31' 50"W for a distance of 394.08 feet; Thence N 89'27' 18"W for a distance of 1190.07 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 20.349 acres,more or less. 11463 w �r it•2R-2Zp �L qrF OF AN d.OPT 2 1520 W.Washington St., Boise,ID 83702•Phone:208-488-4227 www.accuratesurveyors.com Page 19 EXHIBIT MAP REZONE - R4 <s �ta63 LYING WITHIN THE SW 114 OF SECTION 21, T.41V., R.1W., B.M. COUNTY OF ADA STATE OF IDAHO 10 tir s s\ � ss7roo'oa E /244,90' Pty 0A651g63 cy��C LEGEND V �w 56159'06 E �S 66 52'05" E REZONE BOUNDARY SCALE: ti 1"=300' 202.70' 784.95' —— SECTION LINE P i — PARCEL LINE 553 O627 E —R/w—RIW— RIGHT—OF—WAY 109.48 ` — — CENTERLINE L2 55252146 E FOUND 4' BRASS CAP / I I 107.17' I 3 1 TD R/W MONUMENT s!/ S70140'30 E o ® FOUND 2" ALUM, CAP MONUMENT, N0029'13"E 20.3491 AC E 112.43' W)202.15 o STAMPED PLS 8961 ' E tl 0 FOUND 5/8" IRON PIN, N. 1POLLARD LN, LABELED PLS 5710, OR S 892 � CALCULATED POINT P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING N 00'29'13" E N 89'227'18' W i ! 163.00' SW 7/16 CORNER T W OLD SCHOOL LN. PLS 71463 \ G` CORNER N 003456"E 1317.29' 0 L 20 21 1304.74' __ 2, 1304.74' a- 1146 3 29 28 — W 1/1s ————N 89'2T 17 W 260-8 — 28 CORNER BASIS Of BEARING 1/4 CORNERS Q� LINE TABLE STATE HWY 20126 LINE BEARING DISTANCE M J.lb ILI N 89'30'47" W 33.33' L2 S 83133'30" w 55.00' L3 S 8548'43" W 36.25 ��t� T Epp ���AT� L4 N 68'56'21" W 155.65' A�r.r ■VT■ L5 S 60'34'55" E 158.30' 'w 4 r SURVEYING & DAPPING L6 S 67'00'46" E 47.31' ""' s >< �'-� 1520 W.Washington St, CURVE TABLE Boise,8)488-4227Z CURVE ARC LENGTH RADIUS DELTA ANGLE CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH S www.accuratesurveyors.com C1 I 770.B4' 10000.00' 4'25'00" N 28'30'55" E 770.55' ER v G C2 60.81 340.00' 1 10.14'52" S 74'09.59" E 60.73' DATE:JUNE,2022 JOB 22-197 Page 20 .1111111ACCURATE 3PRYET DI.0 & yAPPIN6 I%Z `�F t p y 0 Job Na. 22-187 Zoning R8 Description A parcel of land lyiFkg in the Southwest Quarter of Sectirm 21,Tovunsship 4 North,Range 1 West of the Boisc Meridian and being morn partiaulady*5cribcd as U lows_ Commencing at the found 2 inch alumiatun cap monument in asphalt at qua=corner wnunon to Scr.tiuns 21 and 29,T 4 N,R 1 W from which the found 2 inch alurninlnt cap monument in asphalt at the corner common to Sections 20,21,28 and 29,T 4 N,R 1 W,bears N 84"27' 17"W a distance of 2609.48 feet;thence N 99'27' 17"W along the section line for a distance of 1304.74 fact to the west sixteorlth corner onin on to Sections 21 and 28;thence N 00'34'56"E along the sixteenth line for a distance of 1317,29 fact to a found 5M'inch iron pin with a 2 irKh Wuminwn cap stamped PLS 11463 at the southwest sixteenth corner of Section 21 and the POINT OF BECEVP+T1NG-, Thence N 89127' 19'W for a distance of 25.00 feet to the centerline of N. Pollard Lanc: Thence N 00'29' 13'E along said centerliae for a distance of 163.00 foet; Thence S 89'27' 1 S"E for a distance of 1190,07 Cent; Thence S 00'3P 50"W for a distance of 163.00 feet to a found 5J8"'inch iron pin wish a cap labeled PLS 5710; Thence N 89'27' 1 r W along the sixteenth line for a distance of 1164.95 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 4A53 acres,more or 1css. 11463 1 1520 W.Washington St.,Boise, 10 83702•Phone:208-489-4227- www.a W u Mtesu RWPDM.Co M Page 21 / EXHIBIT MAP REZONE - R8 LYING WI THIN THE SW 114 OF SEC770M 21, T.4N., R.1 W., B.M. A COUNTY OF ADA STATE OF IDAHO 'z LEGEND REZONE BOUNDARY SCALE: 1'=300' 4e \�\ -- SEC170N LINE PARCEL LINE —R/w—R/W— RIGHT-OF-WAY �- CENTERLINE � Q FOUND 4" BRASS CAP I TD R/W MONUMENT i FOUND " AP MONUMENT STAMPED PLS 8961 • FOUND LABELED P8 I LS5710,RON , OR AS NOTED S 8921118" E 1190.07 A CALCULATED POINT w L 1� 4.453E AC. P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING� � P.o.B.� N 8927'18" W 1754.95' N. POLLARD LN. sw 1/16 coRNERW. OLD SCHOOL Ov. — NU PLS 11463 \ CORNER N 00'34 56"E 1317.29' o 4 20 21 13D4.74 _ 21 11 46 3 1 D4.74' 29 28 w 1116 `— N 89'27'17 W 2609.48' _ 28 'L CORNER BASIS OF BEARING 1/4 CORNER STATE HWY 20126 iyOF N J.DP�G LINE TABLE ACCURATE LINE BEARING DISTANCE. r SURVEYING & MAPPING L1 N 89'27'18" W 25.00' 1520 W.Washington St. t Boise,Idaho 83702 L2 N 00'29'13" E 163.00' (208)488-4227 L3 S 00'31'50" W 163.00' ff r7 Y`gE www.accuratesurveyors.com DATE:JUNE,2022 JOB 22-197 Page 22 B. Preliminary Plat(dated: 7/18/2022) 9� q a I so eo � i (HOTA AOLLAR -T)TA810N ' PART) - m I o. H. q:xv6='" z gx6 T #qg-ao�s�4g �a=�`e < O p 00xn �p. �a m€'2�-0�. •£„fr"o'a$ 4ac Nmg'- ` _ > z '�`_x 9 Z ;mgN m Magma , Y =Z _ � A O m � 1 1 A£ Z Z € o'5'9a Z --I(Cn D �� �m,�o v ��$ Zm HIAA - �• D = mz g zA=$" g s o jAgz 4 yRA o 2 0 sN.r m r1 I I i pup A--r � � qa ALDEN RIDGE Kimle Y*Horn ' 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT k MERIDIAN, IDAHG re.,nano Page 23 r h zrsJ l f fJS ..? 1! 14 � .ff 4• r p n ff -� f Y '�• I� � Fmk � __ x yb � y }� �� 1 �{{f :i1. f z 'F': } �••f }� fff lllt' liq' �• n — � yp • _*_ C F T_ _— i h_ v 114' 1'R 11G' I I� 284' ra' Iq' e—an'�• / rt/� x • 'JC ap' !p' b(I� o-d ',Irf 30' S6' SOS �¢I '�P' �' 7.' 7q' G0� 57 5N +y Is+" IRr. lu I I�' I�' IR' I$� IRS Imo=?IQI "I I 'la 21 4R kl' q ! s $ n ' J� w� voeLaRea sueeuwsray �� y Y a fMOTA FAPU ei Page 24 C. Landscape Plans(date: 7/18/2022) A 6 G C E F G H J K _ FGR HEFT L1 .1 SHEET L1 .2 1 co 3 1 � , I 5 v / H Ci 1 I b I I- I A I I 1 :LM /I - —W OUL LN; 1 Z g 0 I I I I I I I I T II I I I I I I I I I 1 I. Q 1 10; z SHEET L1 .3 1 SHEET L1 .4 L......................������������������������������ OVERALL LANDSCAPE & OPEN SPACE PLAN LANDSCAPE SET SHEET INDEX DISCLAIMER: OPEN SPACE LEGEND SEE SHEETS 11.1-11.4 FOR DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLANS, -x1oAAFEA �A,�y o �MMON SEE SHEET L2.0 FOR LANDSCAPE DETAILS. _ 12 SEE SHEET L2.1 FOR NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS. �"E°L-SOLTHeE"""°� SEE SHEET L3-0 FOR TREE MITIGATION PLAN Page 25 D. Alden Ridge Access Exhibit: AL rTr-�T - ALDEN RIDGE SUBDIVISION W.WATERTON DRIVE f Z r Q _ 3 w O WU POLLARD SUBDIVISION � a _ � ., -I POLLARD SUBDIVISION I Po«Moseo hso. � �� . .. .. �_ CHINDEN BOULEVARD -� Kimley»)Horn ALDEN RIDGE SUBDIVISION Page 26 BuildingE. Conceptual 41 Page 27 tr• ` r - - T +- ■ �I arm i k • i L ' r ,� � r ate. + iF i a Y - 7 - z + 416 ra i -T t�.a - - •,-q�K '+SM ..AFT fie. 1"� - -r �'✓,' 1 Page 30 VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. A Development Agreement(DA)is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian and the property owner(s)/developer at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer.A final plat will not be accepted until the DA is executed and the Annexation and Zoning ordinance is approved by City Council. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be substantially consistent with the approved plat, landscape plan,phasing plan, access exhibit, and conceptual building elevations included in Section VII and the provisions contained herein. b. Any existing structures shall be removed upon project development, except for those specifically noted within the preliminary plat to remain. c. The existing home shown to remain on Lot 13,Block 1 shall connect to City sewer services with the first phase of development. d. Due to access and sewer availability,phase 1 development shall not commence until a public road access is available to the site and the required sanitary sewer lift station is constructed by the adjacent development to the south(Pollard Subdivision). e. The Applicant shall relinquish their rights to access W. Old School Lane and provide the Planning Division with written proof of this relinquishment with phase 1 development and maintain access for 6854 N. Pollard Lane&5500 N. Pollard Lane as depicted on the access exhibit(Exhibit VII.E)until such time their permanent access through Pollard Subdivision is constructed. f. The rear and/or sides of homes visible from SH 16 (Lots 8-12,Block 1) shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g. projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. Preliminary Plat Conditions: 2. The preliminary plat included in Section VII.B, dated July 18,2022, shall be revised as follows prior to submitting for Final Plat approval: a. With the first final plat submittal,provide the City written proof that the right-of-way for Pollard Lane has been vacated with ACHD (Lots 5 &6,Block 1). b. Existing home will get a new address upon development of the first phase of this project consistent with the development of the new local street access. Page 31 3. The landscape plan included in Section VII.C,dated July 18,2022, shall be revised as follows prior to submitting for Final Plat approval: a. Depict additional vegetative ground cover in all linear open space consistent with UDC 11-3B-12. b. Revise the design of the semi-private open vision fencing proposed to be consistent with Figure 1 in UDC 11-3A-7. c. Per UDC 11-3H-4,revise the height of the berm/wall combination to be at least 10 feet above the centerline of SH 16 and depict this height within the exhibit on the Landscape Plans. 4. Prior to the Commission hearing,the Applicant shall verify the location of the irrigation ditch along the south boundary to determine if it is on the subject property; if said ditch is proven to be on the subject property,the Applicant should revise any relevant plans to depict this ditch as being piped prior to the City Council hearing in accord with UDC 11-3A-6B. 5. Future development shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district. 6. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 7. The Applicant shall comply with all ACHD conditions of approval. 8. Provide a pressurized irrigation system consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11- 3A-15,UDC 11-3B-6 and MCC 9-1-28. 9. The Director has approved the Alternative Compliance Request to the landscape street buffer requirements(UDC 11-3B-7). 10. Applicant shall obtain Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Administrative Design Review for the pool changing facilities located on Lot 13,Block 3 prior to building permit submittal for this facility. 11. Upon completion of the landscape installation, a written Certificate of Completion shall be submitted to the Planning Division verifying all landscape improvements are in substantial compliance with the approved landscape plan as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14. 12. The preliminary plat approval shall become null and void if the applicant fails to either: 1) obtain the City Engineer signature on a final plat within two years of the date of the approved findings; or 2)obtain approval of a time extension as set forth in UDC 11-6B-7. 13. Prior to the City Council hearing, submit conceptual building elevations for the R-8 building lots. 14. The submitted R-4 &R-8 zoning legal descriptions and exhibit maps are mislabeled as Rezone exhibits;prior to the City Council hearing,the applicant shall provide revised legal descriptions and exhibit maps noting these to be"Zoning"instead of"Rezone." B. PUBLIC WORKS SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: 1. Subject to the Oaks Lift Station and Pressure Sewer reimbursement agreement. 2. Area requires Pollard Lift Station and force main before area can be serviced. Page 32 3. Ensure no permanent structures(trees,bushes,buildings,carports,trash receptacle walls, fences,infiltration trenches,light poles, etc.)are built within the utility easement. 4. Ensure no sewer services pass through infiltration trenches. 5. Water serviced by Suez and not the City. 6. As noted in the Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by Atlas Materials Testing& Inspection. Particular attention needs to be focused on ensuring that all residences constructed with crawl spaces should be designed in a manner that will inhibit water in crawl spaces. This includes,the installation of rain gutters and roof drains that will carry storm water at least 10-feet away from all residences. In addition,rain gutters should be placed around all sides of residences, and backfill around stem walls, should be placed and compacted in a controlled manner. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff,the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can Page 33 be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life,non-safety and non- health improvements,prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-413. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting(http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval,which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x 11"map with bearings and distances Page 34 (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development, and if so,how they will continue to be used,or provide record of their abandonment. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC I 1-313-6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single- point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC I I-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42- 1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT https:llweblink.meridianciU.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=273989&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianC ity D. ADA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES https:llweblink.meridianciU.orglWebLink/DocView.aspx?id=274704&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianC fty E. MERIDIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT(MPD) https:llweblink.meridiancily.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=274066&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC fty F. SETTLER'S IRRIGATION DISTRICT https:llweblink.meridiancily.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=274280&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianC ity G. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SCHOOL IMPACT TABLE https:llweblink.meridiancily.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=275949&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC fty Page 35 H. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https:llweblink.meridianciU.oL-glWebLink/DocView.aspx?id=278247&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ity I. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO(COMPASS) https:llweblink.meridiancily.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=277898&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianC ity IX. FINDINGS A. Annexation and Zoning(UDC 11-511-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment to annex the property into the City of Meridian with the R-4&R-8 zoning districts with the proposed preliminary plat and site design is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, if all conditions of approval are met. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed districts, specifically the purpose statement; The Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment and the request for the development complies with the regulations outlined in the requested R-4&R-8 zoning districts and is consistent with the purpose statement of the requested zone. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health,safety, and welfare; The Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to,school districts; and The Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment will not result in an adverse impact on the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The Council finds the annexation is in the best interest of the City, if all conditions of approval are met. B. Preliminary Plat Findings: In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; The Council finds that the proposed plat is in substantial compliance with the adopted Page 36 Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density, transportation, and pedestrian connectivity. (Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies in, Section V of this report for more information) 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Council finds that public services will be provided to the subject property with development. (See Section VIII of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers) 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvement program; Because City sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the development at their own cost, the Council finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development based upon comments from the public service providers(i.e.,Police,Fire,ACHD, etc). (See Section VIII for more information.) 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and, The Council is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated with the platting of this property. 6. The development preserves significant natural,scenic or historic features. The Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that exist on this site that require preserving. C. Alternative Compliance findings(Landscape buffers along streets UDC 11-313-7): The Director has approved your request for alternative compliance to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-3B-7 for the subject property,based on the required Findings listed in UDC 11-5B-5E, as follows: 1. Strict adherence or application of the requirements are not feasible; or The Director finds it is feasible to meet the UDC requirement for the location of the required street buffer but Staff finds it may not be the ideal location when all parameters are considered (location of the existing home and mature trees that are to remain, a required easement by the water company along the rear of the building lots, and the relative limited number of homes along the highway, 6 building lots). 2. The alternative compliance provides an equal or superior means for meeting the requirements; and Per the analysis above in section V, the Director finds the proposed alternative will be equal or superior to the code requirement because the actual buffer width proposed is 5 feet larger than the minimum requirement, it will allow for existing mature vegetation to remain, and the proposed buffer location allows for a wider berm and more dense landscaping to be placed along this frontage offering more noise and fume mitigation than if the buffer was solely on the subject property. Page 37 3. The alternative means will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or impair the intended uses and character of surrounding properties. The Director finds that the alternative means will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or impair the intended use and/or character of surrounding residential properties if the proposed conditions of approval are maintained. Page 38 W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law for Hadler Neighborhood (H-2022- 0064) by Laren Bailey, Conger Group, located at 7200 S. Locust Grove Rd., approximately 1/2 mile south of the Locust Grove and Lake Hazel intersection on the east side of Locust Grove Rd. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI N:- , AND DECISION&ORDER , In the Matter of the Request for Annexation of 20.5-Acres of Land with a R-15 Zoning District; and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 144 Building Lots and Eleven(11) Common Lots on 20-Acres of Land for the Hadler Subdivision,by Conger Group. Case No(s).H-2022-0064 For the City Council Hearing Date of: December 6,2022 (Findings on December 13,2022) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6,2022, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6,2022, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6, 2022, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6, 2022, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR HADLER SUBDIVISION H-2022-0064 - 1 - 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6,2022,incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for annexation and zoning and preliminary plat is hereby approved with the requirement of a development agreement per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6, 2022, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I- 6B-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s)and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR HADLER SUBDIVISION H-2022-0064 -2- A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(d), if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(a), an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted, including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67, Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(l)(d) and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6, 2022 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR HADLER SUBDIVISION H-2022-0064 -3- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 13th day of December 2022. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER TREG BERNT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison 12-13-2022 Attest: Chris Johnson 12-13-2022 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 12-13-2022 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR HADLER SUBDIVISION H-2022-0064 -4- EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT C: E IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 12/6/2022 Legend DATE: 0 Project Location TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Joe Dodson,Associate Planner --- 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: H-2022-0064 - Hadler Neighborhood r LOCATION: Located at 7200 S. Locust Grove Road, approximately 1/2 mile south of the Locust Grove and Lake Hazel intersection on the east side of Locust ' Grove, in the N 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of -- -- e Section 5,Township 2N,Range lE. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Request for Annexation and Zoning of approximately 20.5 acres of land from RUT to the R-15 zoning district and a Preliminary Plat consisting of 445 144 building lots (52 single-family attached lots &92-3 detached single-family lots)and 11 common lots on approximately 20 acres of land in the requested R-15 zoning district,by Laren Bailey, Conger Group. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage AZ—20.5 acres; PP—20 acres Future Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential MDR,up to 3-8 du/ac Existing Land Uses County residential Proposed Land Use(s) Detached Single-family Residential and Attached Single-family Residential Lots(#and type; 156 total lots—445- 144 residential building lots and bldg./common)) 11 common lots Phasing Plan #ofphases) Proposed as two 2phases Number of Residential Units 445 144 single-family units(52 attached, 92-3 detached Density Gross—7.25 du/ac. Open Space (acres,total Approximately 3.5 acres of open space proposed [%]/buffer/qualified) (approximately 17.5%) Pagel Description Details Page Amenities Four(4) qualifying amenities are proposed worth 11 amenity points—picnic area,playground, a water feature (fountain), and multi-use pathway segments. Neighborhood meetingdate I July 21, 2022 History(previous approvals) No application history with the City B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District l • Staff report(yes/no) Yes • Requires ACHD No Commission Action es/no) Access Access is proposed via new local street connections to E.Via Roberto Lane, a (Arterial/Collectors/State new collector street along the entire north boundary.Via Roberto connects to S. Hwy/Local)(Existing and Locust Grove (arterial street) at the northwest corner of the property. This Proposed) collector street is not yet constructed;the adjacent developer(Brighton) is approved to construct this collector with their project(Apex Southeast)to the north of the subject site. Stub No existing stub streets.Applicant is proposing two stub streets with this Street/Interconnectivity/Cross project; one to the northeast corner and one to the southern boundary. Access Existing Road Network No Capital Improvements Lake Hazel Road is scheduled in the IFYWP to be widened to 5-lanes from Locust Grove Plan/Integrated Five Year Road to Eagle Road in 2022. Work Plan Eagle Road is scheduled in the IFYWP to be widened to 5-lanes from Lake Hazel Road to Amity Road and includes a roundabout at the Eagle Road and Taconic Drive intersection in 2024. The intersection of Lake Hazel Road and Eagle Road is scheduled in the IFYWP to be widened to 5-lanes on the north leg,4-lanes on the south leg,3-lanes on the west leg and 4- lanes on the east leg and signalized in 2023. Lake Hazel Road is listed in the CIP to be widened to 5-lanes from SH-69 to Locust Grove Road between 2036 and 2040. Fire Service • Distance to Fire 4.1 miles from Fire Station#4—within 1 mile of Fire Station#7, currently Station under construction. • Fire Response Time The project currently lies outside of the Meridian Fire response time goal of 5 minutes. It will be within the response time goal once Station#7 is constructed in summer of 2023. • Accessibility Proposed project meets all required road widths and turnaround dimensions including a secondary emergency access to construct more than 30 homes. ■ Water&Wastewater • Impacts/Concerns See Public Works Site Specific Conditions in Section VIII. NOTE: Water and Sewer are currently not available and must be provided to project by adjacent development to the north,Apex Southeast,but the third and final phase of Apex Southeast is approved. Page 2 C. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend Project Location Pill oFscoueer Med-High Diensi $ Residential ®® Ciuic m Density esidential Low Density Residential e 4101 Zoning Map JPlanned Development Map Legend R-4 Legend ' �� R-40 El Project Location R- 0 Project Location R_ �. R=15 City Limits 4 RUT C-C R-8 RUT Planned Parcels o ® � R-4 R-8 ` ------ R=8�® R--21 ®® RUT ' R-4 RUT f UT L RR—Rl RR RUT '------- ------ III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Laren Bailey, Conger Group—4824 W. Fairview Avenue,Boise,ID 83706 B. Property Owner: Blackcatl LLC— 1979 N. Locust Grove,Meridian,ID 83646 Page 3 C. Representative: Same as Applicant IV. NOTICING Planning&Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper Notification 10/19/2022 11/20/2022 Radius notification mailed to properties within 500 feet 10/13/2022 11/17/2022 Site Posting 10/21/2022 11/18/2022 Nextdoor posting 10/13/2022 11/18/2022 V. STAFF ANALYSIS A. Future Land Use Map Designation(hgps://www.meridianciu.or /�compplan) Medium Density Residential(MDR)—This designation allows for dwelling units at gross densities of three to eight dwelling units per acre. Density bonuses may be considered with the provision of additional public amenities such as a park, school, or land dedicated for public services. The subject 20 acres currently contains a large home and other outbuildings with access being from a private driveway to Locust Grove in the location of the future Via Roberto Lane. The subject site is abutted by an arterial street to the west, S. Locust Grove, and a future collector street along the north, E. Via Roberto Lane.Access to the site is proposed via a new local street access to Via Roberto in alignment with an approved access on the north side of the street within Apex Southeast Subdivision. Abutting the property to the east and south are large county parcels that share the same future land use designation of MDR. The City s newest park, Discovery Park, abuts the property at the northeast corner of the site offering close proximity to one of the largest parks in Meridian. The Applicant is proposing 145 building lots on 20 acres of land within the R-15 zoning district which constitutes a gross density of 7.25 units per acre, near the maximum density allowed within the MDR designation. For comparison, the adjacent project to the north, Apex Southeast(H- 2020-0057), was approved with approximately 3.7 du/ac and an average lot size of approximately 7,000 square feet, compared to 3,600 square foot average lot size within this development. Staff notes these development facts of the adjacent project because it shares the same future land use designation of MDR but also includes an area of mixed-use designation while proposing a less dense project. It should be noted that the Applicant is proposing new housing types for this area of this City and is proposing a higher open space percentage for the project than what was proposed with Apex Southeast. The adjacent county parcels to the south and east do not contain a residence and instead are used as pasture for rescued horses. Because of this,Staff does not find it necessary for this Applicant to transition the housing density adjacent to these properties.However,Staff does have concerns with the proposed street layout in regards to the stub street locations. The Applicant is proposing a stub street near the north east corner of the property which is a logical and needed location. The Applicant is also proposing a stub street to the south boundary for future connectivity that Staff does not have concern with. Staff is concerned with the existing property layout of the adjacent county parcels in relation to the proposed stub streets. Specifically,Staff believes an additional stub street should be added along the southeast Page 4 boundary in place of Lots 28& 29,Block 2.Adding this stub street will provide for two stub streets to properties currently owned by the same entity and will not force future road development to avoid such a long stretch ofproperty line without an intersecting street. In addition to vehicular connectivity, the Comprehensive Plan desires safe and adequate pedestrian connectivity through and between developments and to-and-from public spaces, like Discovery Park to the northeast. The proposal to include a micro path from an internal local street to Via Roberto, the collector street along the north boundary, is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.In alignment with this, the noted revision to add a stub street in this location would also allow for better pedestrian connectivity in this area of the site from the southeast through this development and up to Discovery Parr Furthermore, it allows for the noted open space lot(Lot 30,Block 2) to be fronted by two public streets to increase its visibility and remove the additional concern of this area being a remnant area tucked away in a corner behind building lots. The Comprehensive Plan has specific policies related to these types of design elements (see 4.11.03) that support Staffs position. This revision would add both a vehicular and a pedestrian connection between future subdivisions when the properties to the east and south redevelop—Staff has met with the owner of the property to the southeast and they have a desire to include connectivity and open space adjacent to the noted open space of this subject project so Staff finds it even more prudent to include this stub street in this area. It is also important to note the Applicant is proposing two housing types within the Hadler Neighborhood project,single-family detached and single-family attached(two units attached but on separate building lots). The addition of different lot sizes and housing types is a plus for this project and this general area as it introduces a different housing type in this area of the City.However,Staff has some concerns with parking because of the combination of the proposed density, that most of the proposed building lot frontages are relatively small(32-38 feet wide) when a 20 foot wide driveway is presumed for each lot, and because the Applicant is proposing a 27 foot wide section that allows parking on only one side of the street and not both. The Commission or Council should determine if a solution is needed and if so, one option that could help is to require a wider minimum lot frontage than what is currently being proposed.At a minimum, the Applicant should provide a parking exhibit showing where guest parking could occur for this development and quell any concerns of a street section allowing on-street parking on one side versus both sides. With Staffs recommended revisions,Staff finds the proposed project to be generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, as discussed above. Specific Comprehensive Plan policies are discussed and analyzed below. The City may require a development agreement(DA) in conjunction with an annexation and rezone pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A.In order to ensure the site develops as proposed with this application, Staff recommends a DA that encompasses the land proposed to be annexed and zoned with the provisions included in Section VIII.A1. The DA is required to be signed by the property owner(s)/developer and returned to the City within 6 months of the Council granting the rezone and annexation approval.A final plat will not be accepted until the DA is executed and the AZ ordinance is approved by City Council. B. Comprehensive Plan Policies(https://www.meridiancia.or /�compplan): hi alignment with the discussion above, Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies applicable to this project; additional staff analysis to the specific policy maybe warranted and is in italics: Page 5 • "Establish and maintain levels of service for public facilities and services,including water, sewer,police,transportation, schools, fire, and parks"(3.02.01 G). City water& sewer are not currently available to the site;both sewer and water must be made available to this site by the developer of Apex Southeast to the north.Public works has discussed the requirements and outlined the path to receiving services in the Public Works specific conditions in Section VIII.B. Fire Station #7 will be within %mile of the project and the project will be located wholly within the response time goal of the City—Station #7 is slated to be completed in later Summer 2023. The subject site lays within the Kuna School District and not the West Ada School District. City Staff reached out to the Kuna School District for the purpose of obtaining a response to this project as they have not opted into our automatic transmittals. According to this interaction between Staff, all of their schools are over capacity and they have stated they cannot accommodate additional school-aged children.However, Kuna School District Staff have not submitted any formal comments and Staff is not aware of development slowing in Kuna due to these school capacity issues. The subject site is within walking distance of Discovery Park to the northeast which provides for a multitude of recreation opportunities. Staff finds that the existing and planned development of the immediate area create appropriate conditions for levels of service to and for this proposed project. • "Encourage a variety of housing types that meet the needs,preferences, and financial capabilities of Meridian's present and future residents."(2.01.02D). • "With new subdivision plats,require the design and construction of pathways connections,easy pedestrian and bicycle access to parks, safe routes to schools, and the incorporation of usable open space with quality amenities."(2.02.01A). • "Ensure that new development within existing residential neighborhoods is cohesive and complementary in design and construction."(2.02.02F). • "Avoid the concentration of any one housing type or lot size in any geographical area; provide for diverse housing types throughout the City. (2.01.01 G). • "Elevate and enhance the quality and connectivity of residential site and subdivision planning."(2.02.01). • "Support construction of multi-use facilities that can be used by both schools and the community."(2.03.01B). • "Require all new development to create a site design compatible with surrounding uses through buffering, screening,transitional densities,and other best site design practices." (3.07.01A). • "Ensure that new development and subdivisions connect to the pathway system." (4.04.01A). The Applicant is proposing regional pathways along its west and north boundaries to total approximately 2,212 linear feet ofpathway(nearly half a mile). • "Provide options for passive recreational opportunities not typically supplied by parks and facilities such as jogging,walking, and bicycling." (4.04.01B).Applicant is proposing micro paths within the large central open space that have efficient access to the proposed regional pathway network around the perimeter of the project creating ample opportunity for these passive recreational elements. Page 6 • "Work with public and private development and management groups to promote and implement Crime Prevention through Environmental Design(CPTED) strategies." (4.11.03).For the most part, Staff finds the project complies with this policy. The exception is the noted area along the southeast boundary(Lot 30, Block 2) that Staff is recommending be opened up more and be fronted by two public streets by adding an additional stub street to the southeast boundary. Currently, this area is largely tucked behind buildable lots which decreases its visibility from the public street, an integral point CPTED strategies aim to alleviate. If the Applicant replaces Lots 28&29 with a stub street and slightly increases the green space, this issue is resolved. • "Require new development to establish street connections to existing local roads and collectors as well as to underdeveloped adjacent properties." (6.01.02C). Staff finds the aforementioned analysis and policies in general makes the project consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. C. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: According to GIS imagery,there is an existing large home and other outbuildings that will be removed upon development of Hadler Neighborhood.No other site improvements are known. D. Proposed Use Analysis: The proposed use is detached single-family and attached single-family residential with a minimum lot size of approximately 3,000 square feet and an average lot size of approximately 3,600 square feet,based on the submitted plat(Exhibit VII.B). These residential uses are permitted uses in the requested R-15 zoning district per UDC Table 11-2A-2. The Applicant has noted the development is expected to develop in two phases with the number of lots in each phase appearing to be similar(Applicant has not provided the actual lot numbers within each phase but the exhibit appears to show slightly more lots in phase 1 than in phase 2). Because the only public road access allowed for this development is from Via Roberto,no more than 30 homes can be constructed. Therefore,the Applicant has proposed a temporary emergency access within phase 1 located on a future building lot,Lot 23,Block 1, along the west boundary. Meridian Fire has approved this temporary emergency access to allow more than 30 homes to be constructed off of one access. E. Dimensional Standards(UDC 11-2): The residential lots are shown to meet all UDC dimensional standards per the submitted plat. In addition,all subdivision developments are also required to comply with Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards(UDC 11-6C-3). All lots are shown to meet the minimum lot size requirement of 2,000 square feet. There is no minimum street frontage requirement for the R-15 zoning district so, as discussed above,the Applicant is proposing lots with either 32 feet or 38 feet of frontage with a few lots having slightly more frontage. The Applicant is also proposing three (3)common drives within the development;two along the west boundary and one at the southeast corner of the project. The three (3)proposed common drives depict 3 lots taking access from each of them and include at least 5 feet of landscaping adjacent to the abutting lot not taking access from the common drive. The proposed common drive design complies with UDC 11-6C-3D requirements. The Applicant is proposing the north east-west local street(shown as W. Vantage Pointe Drive) within the project to be a long, relatively straight roadway. This street is shown with two intersecting streets on it which allows it to comply with UDC 11-6C-3 requirements for block length measurement. However, the overall roadway is still long and straight. For this reason, Page 7 ACHD is requiring traffic calming along this street with future final plat submittals. Staff agrees with this and is recommending a condition of approval consistent with the ACHD condition. F. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): The Applicant submitted conceptual building elevations for the proposed homes.Note that detached single-family homes do not require Design Review approval but the single-family attached single-family homes do require administrative design review approval prior to building permit submittal. The Applicant is required to submit this Design Review and obtain Planning approval before building permit submittal. The submitted elevations depict varying roof profiles and colors with the same or similar field materials of lap siding and stone accents for the detached homes. All of the attached single-family elevations depict single-story homes with lap siding and stone accents. Overall, Stafffinds the submitted elevations to comply with the minimum standards but hopes future elevations depict more variation in finish materials to help delineate the building facades along public streets. G. Access(UDC 11-3A-3): Access is proposed via a new local street(shown as S. Peak Avenue) connection to E. Via Roberto on the south side of this roadway in alignment with the approved collector street access to the Apex Southeast Subdivision on the north side of Via Roberto.Via Roberto is approved to be constructed with the Apex Southeast development except for the required detached sidewalk on the Hadler side of the street. ACHD has approved the Applicant's proposal to complete Via Roberto with 8-foot parkway and detached 10-foot pathway its south side but notes if Brighton does not complete Via Roberto consistent with their approvals,Hadler is required to construct Via Roberto as half of a 36-foot wide collector street plus an additional 12 feet of pavement. There are no existing stub streets adjacent to the site as Via Roberto is not yet constructed. The Applicant is proposing two stub streets according to the submitted plat; one near the north east corner of the property and one to the south boundary near the southwest area of the project. Staff has no concern with the two proposed stub streets or their locations. However, as noted within the Comprehensive Plan section above, Staff is recommending an additional stub street be added in place of Lots 28&29, Block 2.Adding this stub street will provide for two stub streets to properties currently owned by the same entity to the east and will not force future road development to avoid such a long stretch ofproperty line without an intersecting street(the south/southeast boundary of this project). This revision would likely result in the loss of one building lot and remove one common drive from the project, two points that Staff finds are positive consequences of improving future road connectivity in this area. The Applicant is proposing two different street sections within this development, a 27-foot and a 33-foot street section;both have been approved by ACHD as both are considered standard street sections. The 33-foot street section is proposed for the segment of E.Vantage Point Drive east of the access to Via Roberto along the north half of the site and for the stub street to the south boundary. All other streets are proposed with the 27-foot street section that allows parking on only one side of the street where no driveways exist. Staff notes the Applicant is also proposing a permanent cul-de-sac at the terminus of Vantage Pointe Drive at the northeast boundary because this segment of this street segment is greater than 150 feet in length.Staff has requested a parking exhibit due to concerns with the proposed 27 foot street section in conjunction with the proposed lot widths, as discussed within the Comprehensive Plan section above. Staff anticipates the parking exhibit to show adequate parking for the development above the minimum requirements outlined in code. Page 8 H. Parking(UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11- 3C-6 for single-family dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. Staff will confirm compliance with these standards at the time of building permit submittal for each residence. According to the submitted elevations, each home is proposed with a two-car garage which presumes a 3 or 4-bedroom home and would require a minimum 20 foot wide driveway for each building lot. In addition, as discussed above, some of the streets within this development are proposed as 27 foot wide street sections which only allows parking on one side of the street instead of both sides as allowed on the standard 33 foot section. I. Sidewalks&Pathways (UDC 11-3A-17&UDC 11-3A-8): 5-foot wide attached sidewalks are proposed along the internal local streets consistent with UDC requirements. The Applicant is proposing a 10-foot wide detached multi-use pathway along E. Via Roberto and an attached 10-foot wide sidewalk/pathway along S. Locust Grove;the pathway widths are consistent with the UDC,the Meridian Master Pathways Plan, and exceeds ACHD requirements but the location of the sidewalk along Locust Grove does not comply with Master Pathways plan as there is a desire to detach these sidewalks/pathways along arterial streets to improve pedestrian safety. The Applicant is required to place the multi-use pathways within public access easements adjacent to the public streets unless they are within ACHD right-of-way. The pathway along Locust Grove appears to be attached to Locust Grove which does not comply with the UDC or Master Pathways Plan. So, the Applicant should revise the plat and landscape plan to depict this 10 foot pathway to be located within the required 25 foot buffer to Locust Grove and at least four(4)feet outside of the ultimate ROW to ensure the pathway remains detached. J. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): A 25-foot wide street buffer along S. Locust Grove, an arterial street, and a 20-foot wide street buffer along E.Via Roberto, a collector street, are required and should be landscaped per the standards in UDC Table 11-3B-7C. All landscape areas should be landscaped per UDC 11-3B-5, general landscaping standards. Lastly, according to the submitted plans,the Applicant is proposing micro-paths which should be landscaped in accord with UDC 11-3B-12 standards. The Applicant is showing a 25 foot wide common lot along Locust Grove that is a 22.S foot wide common lot along Via Roberto consistent with code requirements. The landscape buffers are depicted with trees in excess of code and include landscape beds with shrubs and other vegetative ground cover, consistent with UDC 11-3B-7. Therefore, Stafffinds the proposed street buffers comply with all UDC requirements. In addition, all open space areas are shown with trees, sod, and other landscaping in excess of minimum code requirements. K. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-7): All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. According to the submitted landscape plans, the Applicant is proposing 6-foot vinyl privacy fencing along the perimeter of the property and the rear lot lines and 5-foot tall wrought iron open vision fencing adjacent to any common open space areas. Both fencing types and their proposed locations comply with UDC standards. L. Open Space and Amenities(UDC 11-3G): The proposed project is approximately 20 acres in size requiring a minimum amount of open space based on the requested zoning. Per UDC Table 11-3G-3,the R-15 area requires a minimum Page 9 of 15%qualified open space. Per the calculations,the minimum amount of qualified open space required is 3 acres. According to the submitted plans,the Applicant is proposing 3.49 acres of qualified open space, exceeding the minimum amount required. The proposed 3.49 acres equates to approximately 17.45%qualified open space. The qualified open space proposed a. Enhanced landscaping as set forth in Article 11-313,Landscaping Requirements; consists of%2 of the arterial street h. Multi-use pathways; buffer to Locust Grove, the full c. Enhanced amenities with social interaction characteristics; collector street buffer to Via Roberto, d. Enhanced context with the surroundings. the large central open space area, and the smaller common open space area along the southeast boundary. However, Staff is not sure if the landscape buffers to the adjacent public streets meet the enhanced buffer requirements outlined in UDC 11-3G-3B.3 to count towards the open space. Previously, these areas automatically qualified towards the minimum open space but this is no longer the case with the latest open space code updates that desires for more than the minimum to be included within the required buffers in order to count towards the overall qualified open space for a project. The Applicant appears to comply with the first two points outlined in code but may not comply with the last two points: enhanced amenities with social interaction characteristics; and, enhanced context with the surroundings. Staff recommends the Applicant provide evidence these buffers are enhanced beyond the pathway, trees, and grasses. For example, boulders, additional vegetation, decorative elements, decorative fence/walls, additional micro pathways, etc. The burden ofprooffor the proposed common open space to qualify falls on the Applicant and not on Staff. If these buffers do not count towards the minimum qualified open space, approximately I acre of land must be removed from the calculation leaving approximately 2.5 acres of qualified open space which does not comply with the minimum qualified open space requirement. Therefore, the Applicant should provide evidence that the proposed street buffers are qualified open space prior to the Commission hearing OR apply for Alternative Compliance to reduce the amount of qualified open space required due to the project's proximity to Discovery Park to the northeast. The centralized open space area is depicted with playground equipment, a gazebo with picnic benches, and multiple seating areas all connected to the surrounding local streets via 5-foot wide micro pathways. Staff supports the design of the central open space area. As discussed within the Comprehensive Plan section above, the other common open space area (Lot 30, Block 2) is approximately 9,300 square feet in size and is tucked behind multiple building lots. Staff does not have concern with the size of this open space lot but is concerned with its location being a remnant piece and tucked away. Because of these concerns, Staff recommends the adjacent Lot 29, Block 2 be removed and added to the open space lot to increase the visibility of this open space area and include an additional micro path connection to the southeast boundary. UDC 11-3G-4 dictates the minimum amenity points required for projects over 5 acres in size. The project size of 20 acres requires a minimum of four(4) amenity points(1 point for every 5 acres). According to the submitted plans and narrative,the Applicant is proposing the following qualifying amenities: picnic area,playground, a water feature(fountain), and two segments of multi-use pathway equaling approximately'/z mile in length. According to UDC Table 11-3G-4, the proposed amenities amount to eleven(11)amenity points and exceed the minimum amenity point requirements for a project of this size. Staff finds the proposed amenities within this development are sufficient due to the size of the property,their proposed locations within the development,the pedestrian connectivity within the project and to and from the nearby regional park, and because of the general proximity to Discovery Park to the northeast that offers Page 10 additional recreational opportunities for fixture residents of this project and in this general area of the City. M. Waterways(UDC 11-3A-6): According to GIS imagery,there is an open irrigation ditch that runs along the shared north boundary of this site and the Apex Southeast Subdivision to the north. It is not a labeled ditch on the City's GIS and it can be presumed it is being tiled and relocated as part of the construction of Via Roberto Lane by the adjacent developer,Brighton. This Applicant is also required to comply with UDC 11-3A-6 and ensure this irrigation facility along the north boundary is tiled or relocated. N. Utilities (UDC 11-3A-21): The Applicant is proposing and is required to extend necessary public utilities for the proposed project. Public Works has reviewed the subject applications for compliance with their standards and finds them to be in general compliance except for specific conditions outlined in Section VIII.B of this report. However, it should be noted that both water and sewer services must be provided to this development through the adjacent development to the north(Apex Southeast) and are currently not available. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation and preliminary plat applications with the requirement of a Development Agreement per the conditions of approval in Section VIII of this report per the Findings in Section IX of this staff report. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on November 3,2022.At the public hearing,the Commission voted to recommend denial of the subject Annexation and Zoning and Preliminary Plat requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing: a. In favor: Laren Bailey,Applicant, Hethe Clark,Applicant Representative b. In opposition:None c. Commenting: Hethe Clark;Ronnie Reno,Kuna School District. d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Joseph Dodson,Associate Planner f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s) public testimony a. Ronnie Reno from Kuna School District(KSD), as a representative of the school board, testified that KSD cannot accommodate the Hadler Neighborhood development due to school capacity issues. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. School district capacity and a lack of ability to accommodate Hadler Neighborhood; b. Concern with available parking with the combination of the 27-foot wide street section and common drives; C. Concern with proposed density and housing types with no nearby urban services (grocery, gas stations,medical, office, etc.); d. Concern that project is proposed with as many lots as possible within project area without a true identity; 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Commission recommended denial to the City Council due to school capacity issues and a lack of urban services nearby the density proposed within this development. Page 11 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. None C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on 12/06/2022.At the public hearing,the Council voted to approve the subject AZ and PP request. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Laren Bailey and Hethe Clark b. In opposition:None c. Commenting: Ronnie Reno,Dave Yorgason, and Julie Edwards d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Bill Parsons f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Nary 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Kuna School District school capacity and their methodology for mitigating impacts from the increased growth. b. More density and less open space since the project is adjacent to a regional park. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. On street parking within the proposed development. b. Removing the tot lot because of the development's proximity to a regionalpark, C. Impacts this development would have on the Kuna School District and if the adopted methodology for mitigating the impact complied with state law. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. Council voted to approve the annexation and preliminary plat request which reinstated the previous conditions of approval in Section VIII.AND condition of approval 2.a was modified to reflect the changes to the plat as recommended b. Sy taff. Page 12 VII. EXHIBITS A. Annexation and Zoning Legal Descriptions and Exhibit Maps i5G IDAHO 9955 W Emerald St SURVEY Boise,ID 83704 GROUP Phone: (208)846-8570 Fax: (208)884-5399 Hadler Subdivision Annexation Description Project Number 21-360 July 13,2022 Lot 1,Block 1 of Rescue Ranch Subdivision(Book 106 of Plats at Pages 14734 through 14736, records of Ada County,Idaho),and a portion of the adjacent public right-of-way of S.Locust Grove Road,situated in the north half of the southwest quarter of Section 5,Township 2 North, Range 1 East,Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at southwest corner of Section 5,Township 2 North,Range 1 East,Boise Meridian; Thence NOD"04'42"W,2655.92 feet to the west quarter-section corner of Section 5,the POINT OF BEGINNING: Thence$89"52'50"E,37,00 feet along the east-west centerline of Section 5 to the east line of S.Locust Grove Road and the northwest corner of Lot 1; Thence continuing S89°52'50"E,1618.16 feet along the boundary of Lot 1; Thence S00°04'42"E,335.88 feet along the boundary of Lot 1; Thence 12.01 feet on a non-tangent curve to the left having a radius of 225.00 feet,a central angle of 03"03'27",a chord bearing of N88"20'52"W,and a chord length of 12.01 feet along the boundary of Lot 1; Thence N89°52'36"W,313.32 feet along the boundary of Lot 1; Thence 143.71 feet on a curve to the left having a radius of 125.00 feet,a central angle of 65"52'19",a chord bearing of S57°11'14"W,and a chord length of 135.93 feet along the boundary of Lot 1; Thence S24°15'05"W,307.54 feet along the boundary of Lot 1; Thence 75.80 feet on a curve to the right having a radius of 50.00 feet,a central angle of 86"51'39",a chord bearing of S67"40'54"W,and a chord length of 68.75 feet along the boundary of Lot 1; Thence N68°53116"w,342.09 feet along the boundary of Lot 1, Thence N89°52'36"W,669,21 feet along the boundary of Lot 1 to the east right-of-way line of S.Locust Grove Road; Thence S89°55'18"W,37.00 feet to the west line of Section 5; Thence N00°04'42"W,593,86 feet along the west line of Section 5 to the POINT OF BEGINNING. ��15 The above-described parcel contains 20.51 acres,more or less. � p 0 13 4 �� re 0 ygft S `3� Page 13 3.6-�>aoos e ) y » 0 c ( 0 \ » ® k r j ® - \ - } § &- G ` ® z ® _ [ ! / / < ! / \ K § ( a a ' ! / 2 � � j $ /s�2 j k iE ! .sZ j § } CD 0 - % { I ! - s § ± 00. \ � \@ a / % % \ 2 ° : \}\ (A ! CD 3 r< n j 2 o ` * « o ) L \ O $ Z) \ � � \ U o ! ❑ m O / 2 \ � - / z k w / 0 � � 5 / gtn ƒ \ ( e = 3 cn - in --- '9 9® (.� m ° 2 - �w $� eeaRmga . _ » ~� / ® ® _ ® vi ^ zegQgz ¥3#*ao y ^ b SbUIJDGq Q msoe \ Page 14 B. Preliminary Plat(dated: 10/18/2022) ��• � � r` IY � iv i� p' i� ,fl�' III� �' e�. s_�,_ � sv :v =v � _, v� __ �� _� _S _i ..i ..i _' `ems i vZ. X. Sal ` �= iv I— i i—i—i i i— — — -- - ---•-- •---- Page 16 C. Landscape Plans(date: 74� 11/2/2022) s ; .m - r - c7` �e HAD LER SUBDIVISION r ONOVEMBER 2,2022 fEN$ENBELTS MERIDIAN, ID PRELIMINARY PLAT LANDSCAPE PLAN Page 17 -_ _ _ - - } Fl -- i- �M o m m p �S. w„ y 4' i � d ME HAD LER SUBDIVISION NOVEM6ER 7.2027 JENSENBlLTS Assoc qh.5 MERIDIAN, ID PRELIMINARY PLAT LANDSCAPE PLAN ,� ,,,, ® ELY -®.•.,.^_=..._ Page 18 , 1 r R rEM�ios v r� � r I � W I d L z > Zx ! a az >a K'. " W a LLJ / J � = a NOT=S / : r�� xl SV� KEY MAP Ll SA UT I 1 _� rE1Q��MLIf x � rn ewe Fp ?/ L o aO PLANT PALETTE In _ 13 LLJ Noyes ®' —. KEY MAP L2 Page 19 D. Open Space Exhibit: I j ��•�u .. ... .. ... .E.H6 iH r „ - - ------ - - - ---------- - - 1:: :r - -- --- -- - jil 1 - L JR, �. �X r i i i Page 20 E. Phasing Plan: I I etaac�a-o w. !I q� ._,.: :-sn.-,IDS• ,i I -g r.ylllMF�GfiF q._ _—_ _ _— _— h'Ua:_r I I- d:��-nr�.w•u-�n�,n.v»�s.wsgywi�^�-rw•..s.rn..iw..iwv_ .�e�-.�-.y_,1��srrw,�.w.a«r_.� ,-ti-..._•,--...-�rw...-+ce+�ra+.s . I LLLLL Hil ~�r PHASE 1 PHASE 2 -,z Z it I; � ���..ea, ,'�:,�.•����„_�.�. p�,�,� .:�,-' . � �1,,;::, I: E 1 Page 21 F. Common Drive Exhibits: I FUTURE E.VIA ROBERTO I.N. a l: ZERO SETBACK LOT LINE SETBACK LINE LOT LINE (TYPICAL) (TYPICAL) (TYPICAL) - S -- -- — -----, ---- — I° ,t 3.00, 3.00' 3.00, Psl O 3.00' 3,00' BLOCK 1 15 14 13 12 11 10 BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING •,•1. ORIENTATION ORIENTA71ON ORIENTATION l .Ia DRIVEWAY [TYPICAL) ---- e0 Lcc BLOCK 1 0 o r• _ _ VJ w C] IL 01 16 DRIVEWAY / W.VANTAGE POINTE DR. 1z.00'll 0 17 -. azo.00 / BUILDING E ORIENTATION 20.00 , BLOCK 4 BLOCK 1 I I E 18 14 1 2 3 c 0 0 s M , I , I� _1 NONTH 40 20 0 40 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET PROJECT NO 21-0701-HADL D N DRIVEWAY DES ES IGNED By Br HADLER SUBDIVISION CIVIL INNOVATIONS,PLLC E DRAWN By BT MERIDIAN,IDAHO 1043 E.PARK BLw STE 100 CHECKED BY BT BOISE,ID B3712 ISSUE DATE 07/21/2022 PHONE.(208)864-8181 SCALE ASSHOWN SHARED DRIVEWAY EXHIBIT SHEET 1 OF Page 22 ` 22 I I I I I I I I I I I I I �� --r -------- ------- I BLOCK 4 I I I 1 a 14 I 53 I I 52 I I 51 r 12.00'I E26 23BUILDING0 s - _ ORIENTATION 0 L__ - ------------ -- ----------- (TYPICAL) I \\ awe 1200'li \ s 24 o I I 2 0.00's 00 I BLOCK 1 I: 1 BUILDING \, W.ORION GREENS DR. .�' ORIENTATION \ - - ea \ 200 \ y I' 12.00'I _ 25 �e,f. o 0 0 SETBACK LINE---. - - ---- ----- --- N - (TYPICAL) - 'n' DRIVEWAY 12.00'li 26 (TYPICAL) r a I ZERO SE(BACK 5 EEEw z li BUILDING o °'o °'o AA F LOT LINE ORIENTATION (TYPICAL) 29 30 31 32 .IT 12.00'I BLOCK a' `I F2.� ' 28 3' 3' L 27 3' 3' - °3'-- —°3-- --°' --- °3— °3 °3 °3— E.CABALLI LN. E1 NORTH 40 20 0 40 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET PROJECT NO, 21-0701-HADL DW°FILE DRIVEWAY DES IGNEDev Br HADLER SUBDIVISION CIVIL INNOVATIONS,PLLC DRAWN BY BT MERIDIAN,IDAHO 1043 E.PARK BLVD STE 100 CHECKED BY BT BOISE.I°B3712 ISSUE DATE 07/21/2022 PHONE.(208)W-6161 SCALE ASSHOWN SHARED DRIVEWAY EXHIBIT www.°�"I---ti°°s.°°m SHEET 1 OF1 Page 23 BLOCK 4 i 200 33 32 s/ 31 30 o� q� ✓r /� 23 �7 / i oQ/ oR�F�1D�ryG 22 —7 � \RIpN � CgEf \SOR oA�FN4'110 �✓ / • ��T/oN 21 i l o i 20 po 2 g oq/� ���/aV 20 mQ� 13 7 i / 5�¢� 14 i 15 / �� DRIVEWAY / 16 / o O (TYPICAL) / m� / / o g, / BLOCK 2 17 S ETBAL LINE o , 18 � (TYPICAL LINE � �^{ � � � LOT LINE \�e (TYPICAL) w CAYQCCI(� i E® NORTH 40 20 0 40 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET PROJECT NO, 21-0701-HADL DW°FILE DRIVEWAY DES IGNEoev Br HADLER SUBDIVISION CIVIL INNOVATIONS,PLLC DRAWN BY BT MERIDIAN,IDAHO 1043 E.PARK BLVD STE 100 CHECKED BY BT BOISE.I°B3712 ISSUE DATE 07/21/2022 PHONE.(208)W-6161 SCALE AS SHOWN SHARED DRIVEWAY EXHIBIT SHEET 1 OF1 Page 24 BuildingG. Conceptual •.La I�,��. ga aka i.i� III�■. H 111 11'111 i 11+III;is �„ I�{ ■ '®a i�Y�. i�l ICI I I �! ! � ii�i�!>�'i�r'! i�li•II•I�I�! spa i� �i �w ��i'rr V■el ■11 �:.■ref'.I fil r ; itw� iFri;racy 7 C t sue■ � =_ ._... I-i;is>t. ....Ise �3r� +�il�l ;��'�r _ IL i Page 25 JF"6- 1� VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. A Development Agreement(DA)is required as a Provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance. a DA shall be entered into between the Citv of Meridian and the property owner(s)/developer at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer.A final plat will not be accented until the DA is executed and the Annexation and Zoning ordinance is approved by City Council. Currently; a fee of$303.00 shall be paid b, the he Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions. a. Future development of this site shall be substantially consistent with the approved plat, landscape plan, phasing plan, common drive exhibits and conceptual building elevations included in Section VII and the provisions contained herein. b. The existing home and outbuildings shall be removed upon phase 1 development as proposed. c. The rear and/or sides of homes visible from S. Locust Grove and E.Via Roberto Lane (Lots 2-27.Block 1 &Lots 2-24,Block 3) shall incorporate articulation through chance in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop- outs),bays,banding,norches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. Preliminary Plat Conditions: 2. The preliminary plat included in Section VII.B. dated October 18,2022, shall be revised as follows prior to submitting for Final Plat approval: a. Replace Lots &-29.Block 2 with an additional st open space and a micro-path leading to the southeast property boundary for future pedestrian connectivity and to enhance the currently proposed open space on Lot 30,Block 2. b. Direct lot access to S. Locust Grove and E.Via Roberto Lane is prohibited except for the emergency access to Locust Grove and the approved access to Via Roberto,in accord with UDC 11-3A-3. c. Add a plat note stating that Lot 23,Block 1 is a non-buildable lot until such time that an additional Fire approved public street connection is provided. d. Consistent with ACHD conditions of approval.Provide traffic calming measures along W.Vantage Point Drive to help mitigate its long and straight design. e. Depict the 10-foot pathway along S. Locust Grove to be located within the required 25- foot street buffer and located at least four(4) feet outside of the ultimate ROW to ensure the pathway remains detached, consistent with UDC 11-3B-7C.Ia. 3. The landscape plan included in Section VII.C.dated July 29 November 2,2022. shall be revised as follows prior to submitting for Final Plat approval: Page 26 a. Revise the landscape plan to match the revisions made to the street section of Vantage Pointe Drive on the latest preliminary plat. b. Make the necessary revisions to the landscape Plans to match the plat revisions noted above in VIII.A2. c. Depict the 10-foot pathway along S. Locust Grove to be located within the required 25- foot street buffer and located at least four(4) feet outside of the ultimate ROW to ensure the pathway remains detached, consistent with UDC 11-3B-7C.1a. 4. Prior to the Commission hearing.the Applicant shall provide evidence that the proposed street buffers are qualified open space OR apply for Alternative Compliance prior to the City Council hearingto o request a reduction to the amount of qualified open space required. 5. Prior to the Commission hearing.the Applicant shall provide a parking exhibit showing available parking within the subject development. 6. Future development shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7 for the R-15 zoning district. 7. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 8. The Applicant shall comply with all ACHD conditions of approval. 9. The Applicant shall ensure the irrigation ditch along the north boundary is tiled and/or relocated consistent with UDC 11-3A-6 standards. 10. Provide a pressurized irrigation system consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11- 3A-15,UDC 11-3B-6 and MCC 9-1-28. 11. Prior to the City Engineer's signature on each final plat.a 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division and recorded for the multi-use pathways along S. Locust Grove and E.Via Roberto as required by the Park's Department,unless ACHD requires an easement within their right-of-way. 12. Prior to applying for building permits.Administrative Design Review is required to be submitted and approved by the Planning Division for the proposed single-family attached units. 13. Upon completion of the landscape installation,a written Certificate of Completion shall be submitted to the Planning Division verifying all landscape improvements are in substantial compliance with the approved landscape plan as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14. 14. The preliminary plat approval shall become null and void if the applicant fails to either: 11 obtain the City Engineer signature on a final plat within two years of the date of the approved findings: or 21 obtain approval of a time extension as set forth in UDC 11-6B-7. B. PUiBmc WORKS SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: 1. Must provide sewer to and through to parcel R7406180010. 2. Ensure no sewer services pass through infiltration trenches. 3. There currently are no water mains to the site.Water will be coming from the Apex Southeast Development. Page 27 4. Water and sewer in parallel require a minimum 30'easement. Easement width may be greater depending on sewer depth. 5. Where water ties into existing line in E.Via Roberto Ln two vales are required. 6. As part of Apex Southeast.a 12" water main will be brought to the corner of Locust Grove and Via Roberto Ln. Extend 12"water main down Locust Grove to southern property boundary. 7. A second connection to the 12" water main in Locust Grove is required. The City would prefer this connection be made in E. Cavalli Ln with an easement. 8. Must install water blow-off per SD W 13 at eastern boundary along Vantage Pointe Dr. and at the southern boundary at Steeple Ave. See changemarks on sheet PE.200 for additional details. 9. At,the corner of Cadence Ave and Orion Greens Drive,the water mains have multiple odd bends:remove unnecessary bends in said water main. 10. Water and sewer at the corner of Zenith Ave and Vantage Pointe needs to be laid out differently. The current configuration adds an extra sewer manhole that isn't needed.multiple water fittings that are not needed,and a sewer service in a common lot when the house access is not from the common lot. See the uploaded"Water and Sewer Comments"pdf for suggestions of a better configuration. 11. Near the common driveway at the southeast corner of the site there is a water service running across a private property that is not being serviced by the meter. The meter should be located in the landscaping area of the common driveway. See changemarks on sheet PE.200. 12. As noted in the Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by Atlas Materials Testing& Inspection,there are shallow cemented soils across the site. Particular attention needs to be focused on ensuring that all residences constructed with crawl spaces should be designed in a manner that will inhibit water in crawl spaces. Applicant should adhere to recommendations including the installation of foundation drains,and the installation of rain gutters and roof drains that will carry storm water at least 10-feet away from all residences. Foundation drains are not allowed to drain into the sanitary sewer system.nor the trench backfill for the sewer and/or water service lines. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department,and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet,if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures.Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. Page 28 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all incomplete fencing,,landscaping,amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety;which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life,non-safety and non- health improvements,prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety greement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review,and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corns of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-14B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and Page 29 approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the r�olect• 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting(htW://www.meridiancity.orgipublic works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval,which must include the location of any existin s lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the Citv of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility; or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2"x 11"map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer, 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection A eg ncv 21. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development, and if so,how they will continue to be used or provide record of their abandonment. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a,year-round source of water(UDC 11-3B-6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single- point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches,canals,laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways.intersecting crossing or lag adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42- 1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT https:llweblink.meridianciU.orglWebLinkIDocView.aWx?id=275369&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ky Page 30 D. ADA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES https:llweblink.meridianciU.oL-glWebLink/DocView.aspx?id=276691&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC i &cr=1 E. MERIDIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT(MPD) https:llweblink.meridiancily.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=275370&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC i &cr=1 F. BOISE PROJECT BOARD OF CONTROL(BPBC) https:llweblink.meridiancily.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=276388&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC G. MERIDIAN PATHWAYS—CONDITIONS https:llweblink.meridiancily.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=275182&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianC H. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https:llweblink.meridiancily.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=278590&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianC iv IX. FINDINGS A. Annexation and Zoning(UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment to annex the property into the City of Meridian with the R-15 zoning district with the proposed preliminary plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed districts, specifically the purpose statement; The Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment and the request for the development complies with the regulations outlined in the requested R-15 zoning district and is consistent with the purpose statement of the requested zone. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health,safety, and welfare; The Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to,school districts; and The Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment would not result in an adverse impact on the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City. Page 31 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The Council finds the annexation is in the best interest of the City. B. Preliminary Plat Findings: In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat, the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; The Council finds that the proposed plat is in general compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density, transportation, and pedestrian connectivity. (Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies in, Section V of this report for more information) 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Council finds that public services will be provided to the subject property with development. (See Section VIII of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers) 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the development at their own cost, the Council finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development based upon comments from the public service providers (i.e., Police, Fire, ACHD, etc). (See Section VIII for more information). 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and, The Council is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated with the platting of this property. 6. The development preserves significant natural,scenic or historic features. The Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that exist on this site that require preserving. Page 32 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law for Ledges Business Center (SHP-2022- 0015) by Kent Brown Planning, located at 4120 N. Linder Rd. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI ' N:- , AND DECISION&ORDER In the Matter of the Request to Short Plat One(1)Existing Office Parcel into Two(2)Building Lots on 2.28 Acres of Land in the L-O Zoning District for Ledges Business Center Subdivision,by Kent Brown Planning. Case No(s). SHP-2022-0015 For the City Council Hearing Date of. December 6,2022 (Findings on December 13,2022) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6,2022, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6,2022, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6, 2022, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6, 2022, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR LEDGES BUSINESS CENTER-SHP-2022-0015 - 1 - 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6,2022,incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for short plat is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6, 2022,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Short Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I- 6B-7C). E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(d), if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(a), an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted, including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67, Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(1)(d) and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR LEDGES BUSINESS CENTER-SHP-2022-0015 -2- G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6,2022 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 13th day of December 2022. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER TREG BERNT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison 12-13-2022 Attest: Chris Johnson 12-13-2022 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 12-13-2022 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR LEDGES BUSINESS CENTER-SHP-2022-0015 -3- EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY N --- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 12/6/2022 Legend G C-N 0 DATE: R 15 El Project Location pt R 15 y� -�RQ�pt G� L-O TO: Mayor&City Council mil FROM: Joseph Dodson,Associate Planner R-4q�'```�` _ - 208-884-5533 R=$ SUBJECT: SHP-2022-0015 Ledges Business Center Short Plat R-4 R-$ LOCATION: Located at 4120 N. Linder Road, in the North 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 rt RUT R-15 of Section 36,Township 4N,Range 1W. _ R-40 L - acm-T�- I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Short Plat request to subdivide an existing office lot into two (2)building lots on approximately 2.28 acres of land in the L-O zoning district,by Kent Brown Planning. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Kent Brown,Kent Brown Planning—3161 E. Springwood Drive, Meridian, ID 83642 B. Owner: Kevin Amar,Biltmore Co.—1580 W. Cayuse Creek Drive,Meridian,ID 83646 C. Representative: Same as Applicant III. NOTICING City Council Posting Date Legal notice published in 11/20/2022 newspaper Radius notice mailed to property owners within 500 feet 11/17/2022 Posted to Next Door 11/18/2022 Page 1 IV. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed short plat will subdivide the existing office lot into two(2)building lots for future ownership purposes. In 2006,the existing parcel received annexation and preliminary plat approval [Whitewater Subdivision(also known as Redfish)] but the property was never final platted. The pre- plat has since expired. The subject property is located directly north of Sawtooth Middle School and takes access from N. Linder Road. Each lot shares a single access with the other one(northern access)being for emergency access only in accord with UDC 11-3A-3. Lot 1,Block 1 is developed with a new 20,000 square foot, two-story office building(A-2020-0203) and an existing accessory storage building will remain on Lot 2,Block 1 and will be utilized by the office user on the northern lot until such time as the building is converted to an office use or removed when a new office building with a future certificate of zoning compliance and administrative design review application. In addition,the plat depicts the entire parking area to have a blanket cross-access easement as requested by Staff. However,the specific plat note also notes a utility easement; any utility easement should be separated out from the cross-access easement and placed in its own depiction and plat note to ensure the actual dimensions of the utility easement are depicted on the plat. Further, Staff wants to ensure the cross-access easement also includes a cross-parking component for the shared parking. Staff has reviewed the proposed short plat for substantial compliance with the criteria set forth in UDC 11-6B-5A.2 and the required zoning regulations of the L-O zoning district and deems the short plat to be in substantial compliance with said requirements. V. DECISION A. Staff Staff recommends approval of the proposed short plat with the conditions noted in Section V11 of this report and in accord with the findings in Section V111. C. The Meridian City Council heard this item on 12/06/2022.At the public hearing,,the Council moved to approve the subject SHP request. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Kent Brown b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: None d. Written testimony: Kent Brown e. Staff presenting application: Bill Parsons f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. None 4. City Council change(s)to Staff's recommendation: a. None Page 2 VI. EXHIBITS A. Short Plat(dated: 9/26/2022) �� s.a�e Yki�el,un Ad Plot Showing Ledges Business Center-Su6di vision 51tuoted in the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/+ of Sectian 36, S-ly -,nk I Townshlp i North, Range 1 West, Bolse Meridian, �!--.�_,��_—•- -_-`---- -----1^-y^�� —__L__— Clty of Meridian Ado CaYnty, Idaho. 2822 N o �r j — — scds I'.3w a F `ow Xw+MMk,w.,,..�L w�•wgwH HMenl M dF.ew�wr O r..a aK Yw�w x.r �ia,� � S MYw+nlw t M i..rrrY h M+++V►ham+y,r.,.Y^Mw • �'rl�i�,�� �T }rw Y M wort n1 T•wMM Yr rM eY.IPe�r 4rYMW.r ti� Q `y .4yr�..,.�,a r 5prr ow rraa M»'MIA�14rW r Ui x�r h�uinMYwr e.w, IbMrf•Md rl,. e•el 1 �t !ll.�w,mear'a FF.rY+,r is�..�rwwi.v�hr]T�i.Yr�� u tl. rrir- �I i r•P �kL7ti F awe f Beef Peg. IOANa �w�oR SU Y nwo dmr 196 �4� �zx z�r �w ue aaxa RVEY uo.e•aen '°1° ,_,�,e0 �r�•i , GROU P.LLC wow mwcxrur ca, Page 3 'IIiFM � raj �I 13 '10. poll pq ' •, ' , �l11. �. in,311 �kv ,�� KV I � �` -+4ly +: VII. City/Agency Comments& Conditions A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development: AZ-05-021 (Whitewater Subdivision,f.k.a. Redfish Subdivision; DA Inst. # 106165912);A-2020-0203 (MBG Office Building CZC&DES). 2. If the City Engineer's signature has not been obtained within two(2)years of the City Council's approval of the short plat,the short plat shall become null and void unless a time extension is obtained,per UDC 11-6B-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized and obtain signatures from the Ada County Highway District and Central District Health Department. 4. The short plat prepared by Idaho Survey Group on September 26, 2022 by Cody M. McCammon, included in Section VI.A, shall be revised as follows: a. Add a plat note stating the subdivision is subject to the existing Development Agreement and include the DA instrument number(DA Inst. #106165912). b. Add a separate plat note for any utility easement(s) and include the recorded instrument number(s). c. Plat note#7—Include the recorded instrument number for the cross-access/cross-parking easement; ensure depicted cross-access easement on the plat includes cross-parking 5. Prior to building permit submittal for any new commercial building, Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review approval shall be obtained. 6. Lot 2,Block I is a non-buildable lot until such time as the existing storage building is removed, converted to an office use, OR remains as an accessory storage building to the new office building on said lot with a future CZC and DES application. 7. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the previous approvals noted above does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works General Conditions: 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development.The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department,and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life,safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance Page 5 surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff,the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life,non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-14B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings Page 6 per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2" x I I" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development, and if so,how they will continue to be used, or provide record of their abandonment. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 9-1-28.C.1).The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available,a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Page 7 VIII. REQUIRED FINDINGS FROM THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE In consideration of a short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: A. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the Unified Development Code; The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use of this property as Medium Density Residential and the current zoning district of the site is L-O. The Council finds the proposed short plat complies with the Comprehensive Plan and is being developed in accord with UDC standards for the existing zoning district and previous approvals. B. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Council finds that public services will be provided to this property and are adequate to serve the future commercial office building sites. C. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvements program; The Council finds that the development will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. All required utilities were provided with the development of the property at the developer's expense. D. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Council finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing supporting services as services are already being provided to the immediate area. E. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The Council finds the proposed short plat to create a new office building lot will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. F. The development preserves significant natural,scenic or historic features. The Council is not aware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features associated with short platting this site. Page 8 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law for Lost Rapids West (SHP-2022-0014) by KM Engineering, generally located on the south side of W. Chinden Blvd., 1/4 mile west of N. Ten Mile Rd. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI �N,­ AND DECISION&ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Short Plat to Re-Subdivide One (1)Building Lot(Lot 4 and a portion of Lot 5,Block 1,Lost Rapids Subdivision)into Two(2)Building Lots on 1.628 Acres of Land in the C-G Zoning District for Lost Rapids West Subdivision,by KM Engineering,LLP. Case No(s). SHP-2022-0014 For the City Council Hearing Date of: December 6,2022 (Findings on December 13,2022) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6,2022, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6,2022, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6, 2022, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6, 2022, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR LOST RAPIDS WEST SHP-2022-0014 - I - 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6,2022,incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for short plat is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6, 2022,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Short Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I- 6B-7C). E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(d), if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(a), an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted, including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67, Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(1)(d) and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR LOST RAPIDS WEST SBP-2022-0014 -2- G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of December 6,2022 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 13th day of December 2022. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER TREG BERNT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison 12-13-2022 Attest: Chris Johnson 12-13-2022 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 12-13-2022 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR LOST RAPIDS WEST SBP-2022-0014 -3- EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY N --- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 12/6/2022 _ DATE: It TO: Mayor&City Council -£a- �'1 5 x E� 4 ksa `¢ R 8 =�atioi � FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 1 r .YEfr.FS' C 208-884-5533 w'CHINDEN'SLOD s u ti W5I WFA RN Eft LH F .� }ws�_YEA� SUBJECT: SHP-2022-0014 w ' w W EW Lost Rapids West 1 J ti W 3LLI{N {� W Suzy{Y C4Y1 LN LOCATION: Generally located on the south side of W...R-s F' Chinden Blvd. 1/4 mile west of N. Ten q x- ° w 3*"`'° � � * w CREEtsT Mile Rd.,in the NE 1/4 of Section 27, } 2 F4 °{F ' TAN.,R.1W. z Ki Z = b ., I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Short plat to re-subdivide one (1)building lot(Lot 4 and a portion of Lot 5,Block 1, Lost Rapids Subdivision)into two(2)building lots on 1.628 acres of land in the C-G zoning district. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Cameron Scott,KM Engineering,LLP—5725 N. Discovery Way,Boise,ID 83713 B. Owner: GFI—Meridian Investments II,LLC—74 E. 500 S., Ste. 200,Bountiful,UT C. Representative: Same as Applicant III. NOTICING City Council Posting Date Legal notice published in 10/23/2022 newspaper Radius notice mailed to property owners within 500 feet 10/20/2022 Posted to Next Door 10/18/2022 Page 1 IV. STAFF ANALYSIS The short plat proposes to re-subdivide Lot 4 and a portion of Lot 5,Block 1,Lost Rapids Subdivision into two(2)buildable lots. The property consists of 1.628 acres of land in the C-G zoning district. Staff has reviewed the proposed short plat for compliance with the criteria set forth in UDC 11-6B-5 and deems the short plat to be in compliance with said requirements. The street buffer along W. Chinden Blvd.was constructed and landscaping with the previous subdivision improvements. Future development of the proposed lots should comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the C-G zoning district. Access to this property should be provided via the existing driveway along the southern boundary of the site; direct lot access via W. Chinden Blvd. is prohibited. V. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed short plat with the conditions noted in Section VII of this report and in accord with the findings in Section VIII. B. The Meridian City Council heard this item on 12/06/2022. At the public hearing.the Council moved to approve the subject SHP request. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Stephanie Hopkins b. In opposition:None c. Commenting None d. Written testimony: Stephanie Hopkins e. Staff presenting-application: Bill Parsons f Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. None 4. City Council change(s)to Staff s recommendation: a. None Page 2 VI. EXHIBITS A. Short Plat(date: 8/25/22) PLlE OF WEST LOST RAPIDS WEST SUBDIVISION APES ONGION OF ALL OF LOTAANDAPORTIONOF LOT 5,BLOCK I OF LOSTRAPIDSSIBCFN91M, STRAATED IN A FOROON OF THE NOHHFAST V4 OF SECTION 27,WMIRIP 4 NORFH,RAIK,E i WEST,ROSE FAMMM,CRY OF MMIMAK ADA=RM,I W O 2022 W.Chir k 58oukvrd 12EIJ26] �IFl Clef IxET�IMt]MA-t6AdA —- - �r,N Earl:Jft x A � E] !i n sr•Tx>= 1�5n�__ ___— _ _ Is w__— __—_- ter,_ - xo V � Ala I� I I' I� RECFwXn lnwAJ,� r Yl9:]35 E mm I - HIM INEEK I sxEEr t-ruT ua.E.R�,1].z fur xo1Es rT`__ ter___ ___L__ __ iXEQ 2-(F1rRRr/•IE OF OMYQS I � n R,", � SNEEI 1-IIi11RG1Ei AxP 1PR"1TWL4 I I ss § Y I I � LEGEND y I Fyurap ruweiu n*,.S Xm6D ! Pn SL ® N. R61 LN155 OTN EFl,—E 1,]TE1 I I � F-0IMV 1!S•FFEAi 1NiH fLL`lIC GP MYd® ■ •xSN Ie6oY.xE�IKF]YxM ye'eE,Yx xe .� I � Miuu"IIC tM uYdx:b 1�5k 1616Y } I • >t1 In'N—NM I•WTIE[w•Yw XE3 I ] � 5 6 IISN 166RY } A I e &M,1 Ha C.1Plsh]]-hl Srvo ..—10 CR 31) g �� IeelRgldf5�11�Vlui V ILT hw�A 1uxRER II x[YNLEYi IAT ruxeEl I I ,4nd owswt A®0.ti1Twr, IXJJko.x I11E a �} 1'���]SO xFld,lal ar-ufei IGT IInE I I I I SFL'n6e u1e n M xLwLEYT EWrGM'U.E I I � II II W _ —_ Er.EElvrr IrvE + L'M SGs'C 9JlIDe GYMC`If(�xQiC 0] L--- W9'1]'1E'x R3Y,25' -—-- - RHHH7106 Ie�M10V1 RI IIw a slab m[llf m Ruvs,n>�leYaFlmUl, y1y�� Kx'cnz cF nln 6]En1Y,GWA. � R] mxe]s snEst xn eiStf6 a.n1[erT•,Iwc. SLI TWEY NARMTFWE 11E IIISa:r.E:F 1XR sSmEx R ro aESIla1—111E IAA W" xFFPFn:FussxH xlu ed'l. -N x FELL ausl£•A- 5 x)t,L1E].1 YCM..ErI'a RECYW-E FN.xC R h +°usTic Yc sxx�'=iiYT[s°�xo el*sre:Tic larc ccx NOFES ,. 11xs sueuxeAu Is v,alECT TA KYSTRLCIY-w.XwEA.Tnr.u.r-r_uc wl.m.wcE.as RE[r=mo�L rnaes ac[c=s Eas.o-rt ]. ,13 SHT,1n NFaL81 18 JM tr,YI9ek 1 ME suME.Yi TO n xOZTx sISu.N rotlEz[sFA4 r^3CYRICl,G•ECrT ffz IxsT. r,[I Iyp x es snrin nowv,wrs la r+4 lT,IWCX 1 Mc eulunr m e slr•or Ywllxv Irlrlxo'e•9lort�leis.rb. so-1 wRo. fif62 es xHe1r•XER<ly,IPIS la xp Ir,ILVGI 1 iulE>:IIrt Q.T m.4f'nF IE9rH1 sE1W Mn xtiQ QafIIPR Fpe F T.vc f N C I N E E R�N G * zul r-nxmTa � a.. 16 sXTAM 111-4..Lris 11 O1T IM 9� Q a , 8S 8 A0M `LG1]. 1p 1- O a I-A17 E1Q AT ME 1. I'NEea91[P,. PT :f PT 4 11 £ 1 M. R— Po —2 ] Irrr�E.w p.xwn u exIG4 ORENnY_E CIxErFC rl1 L6T V6 CCwY.x P]PE01:Po5R`RI-rn+v LhRxk a fAOU fLOT YCE 6W�E]�T FCR =u311C ulII1RF$�Tr Cf IEAtllxl STx FEI IllV13.PIr FP'6[69r:gll.^.x=sE55ERRE]IYd.",PIFI,M I6i REVaV£ Page 3 B. Existing Approved Landscape Plan(dated: 4/22/19) i I i � III j � l o II a a_ I I I I I f L --_-'- 0 f I a� I I W O � I{I �~••� AiR4R0YR� -- — --------------®----------------- — r r —= — -------°------ -- R.v`recnew� nwttxun¢�s�al¢r u:o �m N ^ vve wca Q11 nmrmc vu iwrz max^x`a" mn a..�m«s�wu uuw mcrs xn m 1xu® e 2 Page 4 VII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS&CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development: H-2018-0004 (AZ, PP,VAR; DA Inst. #2018-079970)and H-2019-0056 (FP). 2. If the City Engineer's signature has not been obtained within two(2)years of the City Council's approval of the short plat,the short plat shall become null and void unless a time extension is obtained,per UDC 11-613-7. 3. The short plat prepared by KM Engineering on 8/25/2022 by Kelly Kehrer, included in Section VI.A shall be revised as follows: a. Reference R.2—Include the recorded instrument number of the Record of Survey prior to recordation of the plat. b. Include a new note: "Minimum building setback lines shall conform to the applicable zoning regulations of the City of Meridian at the time of issuance of a building permit." c. Include a new note: "Any re-subdivision of this plat shall comply with the applicable zoning regulations of the City of Meridian in effect at the time of re-subdivision." d. Include a new note: "Lots shall not be reduced in size without prior approval from the health authority and the City of Meridian." e. Include a new note: "The bottom of structural footings shall be set a minimum of 12- inches above the highest established normal ground water elevation." f. Include a new note: "Direct lot access via W. Chinden Blvd. is prohibited." 4. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the previous approvals noted above does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. Commercial lots require 6-inch sewer service line 2. Ensure no sewer services pass through infiltration trenches 3. Construction plans show new sewer service to Lot 2, but not a water service. Water services cannot cross lot lines, if new water service is required, easement over that water service including the meter must be shown and obtained. General Conditions: 1. Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. Page 5 3. All improvements related to public life,safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff,the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City.The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life,non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. It. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a Page 6 certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2" x I I" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development, and if so,how they will continue to be used, or provide record of their abandonment. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC 11-313-6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available,a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC I I-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. VIII. REQUIRED FINDINGS FROM THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE In consideration of a short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: Page 7 A. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the Unified Development Code; The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use of this property as Commercial and the current zoning district of the site is C-G. The Council finds the proposed short plat complies with the short plat standards listed in UDC 11-6B-5. Future development should comply with the dimensional standards for the C-G district listed in UDC Table 11-213-3. B. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Council finds that public services will be provided and are adequate to serve the proposed lots. C. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvements program; The Council finds all required utilities will be provided with lot development at the developer's expense. D. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Council finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing supporting services as services are already being provided in this area. E. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The Council finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. F. The development preserves significant natural,scenic or historic features. The Council is not aware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features associated with short platting the structure on this site. Page 8 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution 22-2361: A Resolution Vacating the remainder of S. Black Marlin Ln., located within lots 10-18, Block 1 of Interstate Center Subdivision ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2022-098678 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=3 VICTORIA BAILEY 12/14/2022 09:43 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE RESOLUTION NO. 22-2361 CITY OF MERIDIAN BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, BY THE CITY COUNCIL: HOAGLUN, PERREAULT, STRADER A RESOLUTION VACATING THE REMAINDER OF THE PRIVATE ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS PLATTED AT LOTS 10-18,BLOCK 1 OF INTERSTATE CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO AND AS SHOWN ON ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A"; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on December 6, 2022 the City Council of the City of Meridian held a hearing on the vacation of the remainder of the private road and public utility easements platted at Lots 10- 18, Block 1 of Interstate Center Subdivision, located in the Southeast One Quarter of Section 13, Township 3 North, Range 1 West,Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and as shown on attached Exhibit"A' and WHEREAS, after such hearing, the City Council, by formal motion, did approve said described vacation;and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section 1. That the remainder of the private road and public utility easements platted at Lots 10-18, Block 1 of Interstate Center Subdivision, located in the Southeast One Quarter of Section 13,Township 3 North,Range l West,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and as shown on attached Exhibit"A", is hereby vacated. Section 2. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. Passed by the City Council of the City of Meridian,Idaho,this 131h day of December, 2022. Approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 131h day of December, 2022. Attest: Mayor Robe E. S mison Chr Johns"I '`'ty Clerk S.Black Marlin Lane Easement Vacation—H-2022-0078 STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss: County of Ada ) On this 13th day of December,2022,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ROBERT E.SIMISON and CHRIS JOHNSON,known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively,of the City of Meridian,Idaho,and who executed the within instrument,and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 3-28-2028 S.Black Marlin Lane Easement Vacation—H-2022-0078 � y rn � rn >v �' Ry UN?LA TIED w p-YSe• hll' I I I /•� p• a m mil,e•E CD l l w 01W 11'E 31a15' M ain J•]Y• 7M-37 m 8P.1gr E CRY OfW31'11-E A7 L loan Leif Mae' Lair aE.Y�_ iU-w 71 H a1810 I I i II ' I I Q� V1 n FF++ "..Yizigae ,;g{Rutl G u 13 s CD �a4eEi�M41i"vgRi!Eq' CDCD r� u$gx:sxa9S$$B��aEE "98898888Haee88!: I �- I: nem' wo/R E t 1 w T 'MW 1 I � � cn CD 2.0,w 9LLIE q X asasr '- + �-'• V1 I"i I ----- go I �Ja w+aQ18E �. � 3 A� n a`-FiM40 'i9 94 tC4 +. • 8 I S I ;E �1 O pj ta:etvgts;54ii waQ*Rz$g a .. I I , Sy 3�$.� '� C7 � �Ia•�•Ei. MW 00, 5 R I�� A � R{ �g i a_rar. as ea' m ti 1`E g arvvr• r+r ffI '� ream momrar/ haosarE I sas ! i-_° E I :I 0��" CD s ¢ 1. "fit$' liv s �$1 : x g plE$$1ea r r CD CD w It aeeao ��e T I �er.ar lr ; uD� M OmY�Y[ N 00.)Sr E S 55r1' rr 1 y s I--' Ct�.D y.I r-� 1 IS � 5 r I I ✓I � 6� r`i � �..I aa•_or s/af R .�� '$ � s'"D� �-'. ttS' l ' ' IRSO LA l d P •YTSJT E w a01 rJr CD IrD �! 0 m �Ly M C/G. CD Par IN �� �~ f� a B.BLACK'MARLIN LANE_�' J',r fp yS1�f '�'/ b6 a a. R �� � f D .60a' m.Of C+•� � R i fj a CD CD p S lig v r 11 �eJf1 s1eet Rt 3�� 5nlly;£a e,tA [ • asT� N cn s ;• ;gE �_ s� �p=rrgs��a�l�=::s=1.�=�;g���''[� g�xxa� � � C MRS. M'Fsy �s. Vi 501137,I1,wIsla N' 19'? 'gig �xs.gE•N $ �-¢ mr• s 8�I � � m� -y���g".iao $�°,�sllz3�ag4_S_f.3,rys_ � �s°g� � �•'• �8 • I Y gZ 5Z B :i{59 r•F�• { i/ 9 a ei E, _ 1,. ly ooz zZ q, 32 § �6$ �F g gigs Se ,T q9E Shad 95: 18 it• a { CD3�c�>i 3 s t � n"x si — — DiCD ', a1wEEp sou7e4 MEwIdAN EiUAU { a`�.! E/ ,ay3Eg e T { gv.,, r � •NIOK WAY NO. dD) M Y 11 ! 11 i 43N i i 9�.i 1.+. 'g w s —ul.a1E.eai e.V�r rrar� s y s 1.x o R ="' • eta�woman o wrrJaDnf D E ` t S g.e E j r i { 4 g ;g O O J b p CD W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution 22-2360: A Resolution Approving Adoption of an Amendment to the Citizen Participation Plan for the Community Development Block Grant; Authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to Execute and Attest the Same on Behalf of the City of Meridian; and Providing an Effective Date CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 22-2360 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, HOAGLUN, PERREAULT,AND STRADER A RESOLUTION APPROVING ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AND ATTEST THE SAME ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to the regulations of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD"), it is necessary to adopt a Citizen Participation Plan that sets forth the jurisdiction's policies and procedures for citizen participation; and WHEREAS, the previously adopted Citizen Participation Plan has been updated to streamline HUD requirements; WHEREAS, the City held a public hearing on the attached Citizen Participation Plan on July 26, 2022, and held a public comment period on the draft application materials from June 24, 2022 to August 15, 2022; NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO: Section 1. That the amended Citizen Participation Plan, as attached hereto, be, and the same hereby is, adopted as to both form and content. Section 2.That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of City of Meridian, Idaho this 13th day of December, 2022. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian,Idaho, this 13th day of December, 2022. APPROVED: ATTEST: By: Mayor Robert E. Simison Chris Johnson, City Clerk RESOLUTION ADOPTING CDBG DOCUMENTS—Page 1 OF 1 City of Meridian Citizen Participation Plan The City of Meridian is an entitlement community for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD). As a recipient of these funds, the City is required to have a strategy for citizen participation. This document outlines the City's process and plans for soliciting and receiving citizen input during the lifecycle of Meridian's CDBG Program. Included in this is the Consolidated Plan (Con Plan), Action Plan,Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report(CAPER), Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI), or amendments to any of these documents. This plan will be effective upon approval. The City of Meridian recognizes the importance of public participation in understanding current housing and community development needs and barriers and prioritizing resources to address those needs.The Citizen Participation Plan is intended to encourage citizens of all ages,genders, economic levels, races, ethnicities, cultures, and special needs equal access to become involved in the CDBG planning process each year.This Citizen Participation Plan was written per Sections 91.100 and 91.105 of HUD's Consolidated Plan regulations. Any complaints related to the Con Plan,Action Plan, CAPER,Al, amendments, or the CDBG program, in general, should be directed to Meridian's CDBG Program Administrator. Staff will respond within five (5) business days. Translations and Reasonable Accommodations The Citizen Participation Plan,Con Plan,Action Plan,and Al will be made available in formats accessible to persons with disabilities and in languages other than English upon request. All materials, announcements, and notices of the hearing will include information about how persons with disabilities and non-English speaking persons may request accommodations to review the proposed plan and provide written or oral comments. Upon request, or in the case of public hearings where a significant number of non-English speaking residents can reasonably be expected to participate, the City will provide both written interpretation(s) of the proposed consolidated or action plan one (1) week before the public hearing or within 48 hours of a request; and/or oral interpretation atthe public hearing. CDBG Citizen Participation Consultation with Organizations and City Agencies When preparing the Con Plan,Action Plans, and the Al,the City will actively consult with public and private agencies that provide housing,health,and social services to ensure that the interests and needs of all groups are being adequately identified.These may include the regional Continuum of Care, private businesses/employers, residential developers, nonprofit organizations, philanthropic organizations, and community-based and faith-based organizations, including those that provide services to special needs populations. This consultation will occur through interviews conducted with such organizations, stakeholder meetings, and incorporation of data and reports produced by such organizations into the Con Plan,Action Plans,and Al,where applicable. Glossary of Relevant Terms Action Plan.The yearly portion of the Consolidated Plan identifies the specific activities and projects to be undertaken by the City with CDBG funds during that program year. Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice(AI).This document reviews housing challenges and fair housing issues in the City and broader region. It results in goals and action steps to address and mitigate barriers. Community Development Block Grant(CDBG). Established under Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 as amended, Public Law 93-383,and the funding received under such programs, assists communities in addressing housing and community development needs, primarily for low-and moderate-income residents. Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report(CAPER).The CAPER reports the City's completion of projects and activities as outlined within the Action and Consolidated Plans and the expenditure of CDBG and related block grant funds,as received by the City. Consolidated Plan.A five-year plan of a City's housing and community development needs, resources, priorities, and proposed activities to be undertaken for the CDBG programs. Relevant Areas and Programs.The City of Meridian's 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan covers the geographic area within the city limits of Meridian. CDBG funds must benefit low-and moderate- income residents and/or neighborhoods within Meridian. CDBG Citizen Participation Public Participation and Comment Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans The City will conduct at least two public hearings at different stages of the annual planning process to obtain citizens'views on housing and community development needs, program performance, funding priorities, and to respond to questions. At least one of these hearings will be held before the proposed plan is published for comment. The City may elect to collect citizen input through alternative public involvement techniques (e.g.focus groups,surveys, and social media)with the intent of developing a shared vision for investment in communities and neighborhoods. Upon request,the City will offer technical assistance to groups that represent low-and moderate-income persons, in developing funding proposals under any of the goals covered by the Consolidated Plan.The level and type of assistance will be determined annually by the City depending on need,as evidenced in past applications and expressed by residents,stakeholders,and past grantees.The assistance need not include the provision of funds to the groups receiving technical assistance. The citizen input techniques will be designed to encourage participation by low-and moderate- income residents, residents living in neighborhoods with revitalization needs, residents benefitting from public housing assistance, and residents with special needs.The Ada County Housing Authority (ACHA)will be notified about Consolidated Plan activities related to developments and resident communities to allow this information to be available at public hearings required for its plan. Before the adoption of the Con Plan and Action Plans, the City will make available to interested parties the draft Plan for a comment period of no less than 30 days and will conduct a public hearing during or at the end of the 30-day comment period. The 30-day comment period and the public hearing for the Consolidated Plan and Action Plans will be noticed in the City of Meridian's newspaper of record and by posting the notice on the City's website and social media sites.The public notice shall be published at least two weeks in advance of the public hearing and shall include information regarding the subject of the hearing, the date,time, and location of the public hearing, and a notice of opportunity to provide written or oral comment. Public hearings will follow the format set forth by the City for regular Council meetings and may include alternative formats such as a virtual platform. CDBG Citizen Participation In the event of an emergency, HUD may grant a waiver to the number of days required for a public comment period to ensure funding can get into the community as quickly as possible. Under these circumstances, Action Plans, substantial amendments, and the Citizen Participation Plan will only require a five (5) day public comment period. The legal notice for at least one local newspaper will be published no less than five (5) days before the end of the public comment period. The draft Con Plan will contain the amount of assistance the City expects to receive through the HUD CDBG grants and the strategic goals that will guide funding over the five planning periods.The Action Plans will detail the projects to which the City may allocate funds for that particular program year. Electronic copies of the draft plans will be available on the City's website and circulated to residents and stakeholders who have expressed interest in receiving the document via email. Hardcopies will be available at City offices upon request. The Council will consider any comments or views of individuals or groups received in writing or orally during the Plan process and at the public hearing to be held during,or immediately following,the 30-day public comment period.The Council shall, at a regular or special public meeting, review the proposed Plan and the summaries regarding the incorporation of citizen comments or views provided,and vote on a resolution to adopt the final Consolidated Plan or Action Plan. Comments received on the draft plans will be summarized in the final plan submitted to HUD.Copies of letters and emails received may be appended to the plans if requested and permitted by commenters. All comments received during the planning process and public comment period will be accepted and a summary attached to each plan. Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice The citizen participation process for the Al will include alternative public involvement techniques (e.g. focus groups,surveys, and social media)with a focus on reaching residents who are most vulnerable to fair housing challenges and are historically underrepresented in community engagement processes.The Al will be available for public review during a 30-day comment period. Electronic copies of the draft Al will be available on the City's website and circulated to residents and stakeholders who have expressed interest in receiving the document. Hard copies will be available for review at City offices upon request. CDBG Citizen Participation CAPER A public notice of the CAPER availability with the date, time, and process for public comment will be published in the City of Meridian's newspaper of record at least 15 days in advance of the end of the public comment period. The City will accept all comments received during the public comment period and provide a summary of these comments with the CAPER. Substantial Amendments Public comments or a change in circumstances may warrant an amendment to the Con Plan and/or Action Plan. Minor changes require notice to HUD while major changes require a substantial amendment. The following criteria define adjustments that require a substantial amendment: • A change in the expected federal allocation of the block grant of 20 percent or more. • A change in the City's allocation plan that would redirect more than 20 percent of annual funding to a different project goal. • Carrying out a project using CDBG funds or program income not previously described in the Con Plan or Action Plan. In the event of a substantial amendment, the City will publish a notice of the recommended changes and the date,time, and location of the public hearing in the City of Meridian's newspaper of record at least two weeks in advance of the public hearing.The City will provide a 30-day public comment period with a public hearing during or at the end of the 30-day comment period. The Council shall, at a regular or special public meeting, review the proposed substantial amendment and the summaries regarding the incorporation of citizen comments or views provided, and vote on a resolution to adopt the substantial amendment. Following the Council's passage of the resolution adopting the substantial amendment,the City will notify HUD of the amendment and submit a copy of each substantial amendment to HUD as it occurs. City Council will consider any comments on the substantially amended Plan from individuals or groups. Comments must be received in writing or orally at public hearings. Virtual meetings and oral comments from the public are allowable if the City chooses to utilize this platform. A summary of the written and public hearing comments on the substantial amendments will be included in the final Plan. CDBG Citizen Participation Public access to records The City will provide all interested parties with access to information and records related to the City's Con Plan,Action Plans,CAPER, and the City's use of funds under all programs covered by the Con Plan during the preceding five years. Use of available waivers from HUD The City of Meridian,when provided the authority from the Housing and Urban Development Department, may utilize any flexibilities or statutory waivers provided by HUD as they relate to the Community Development Block Grant Program. Waivers are typically provided in the event of a disaster and/or emergency declaration,though waivers may be available at other HUD-specified times. A declared disaster or emergency may include, but is not limited to the following: 1) Man-Made Disasters 2) Natural Disasters 3) Terrorism 4) Infectious Disease or Pandemic S) National Emergency If waivers or other authorities are available from HUD to assist in expediting available additional resources and/or any plan modifications, the City may take full advantage of offered exceptions to standard Citizen Participation requirements outlined in other sections of this plan. Reasonable notice and opportunity for public response or comment will be considered as the minimum outlined in any provided waivers. CDBG Citizen Participation • Resolution Will be added when complete. CDBG Citizen Participation E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Community Development Block Grant Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report .;wlLy-, .� i.�d - y: �•4 � ��-�.----��-. �� - - -•� __� - �.� � '�s ':�v i _ ti -..o- - ti. � - `` z � - ��M1 it � f - 'ti � _' rr7-.` r— - 1.�+'�� — • v� -. _ r'�* � �- _•� -''� t�'� -� 4.1K� - s � � - � _ �� Ak I DIAN IDAHO Year Program OctoberI • I What is a CAPER ? Consolidated Annual Performence and Evaluation Report (CAPER ) • Annual Accomplishments • Evaluation of progress toward Consolidated Plan goals • Transparency to the public Program Identifying Goals • Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Goals • Housing Market Analysis • Community Engagement Goals for 20117- 20211 Consolidated Plan • Improve Accessibility • Enhance Homeownership Opportunities • Provide Social Services • Stabilize the Rental Gap • Admin and Fair Housing i Streetlights i F Public Works installed/modernized 25 streetlights on Improv e walking routes to Meridian schools. Access 'lb 'lllty • � ���y� Chateau Park Playground Installed an all-abilities playground, additional features and walking path will be completed in PY22. Fairview Avenue Connection Completed the installation of a multi-use path with an accessible ramp and handrail. I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Homeowner Repair Goal: 15 Households • Provided emergency, accessibility, and weatherization repairs to 7 households. Am Am • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Ah Boys and Girls Club Scholarships Goal: 50 Youth Access to extended care programs for 39 youth. • • • • • • • • • • Jesse Tree Emergency Rental Assistance " ' ' ' ' Goal: 35 Individuals In � Provided rental assistance to 28 individuals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provide Social Boys and Girls Club Counseling Goal: 100 YouServ 'ices , cont . Provided counseling to 3 youth . Project is closed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARES Act Fund IDAEYC Childcare Scholarships Goal: 64 Children Provided scholarships for 37 children to receive childcare. Expires May 2023. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NeighborWorks Boise Mortgage Assistance Goal: 76 Individuals Provided mortgage assistance to 66 people. Project is closed. NOW Owl Stabilize the Rental Gap The intent was to provide homelessness prevention/emergency rental assistance , which falls under public services . These outcomes are being reported under the goal of Providing Social Services . Admin and Fair Housing • Subrecipient Management (e .g . monitoring , technical assistance, oversight of construction projects to ensure compliance with Federal regulations such as Davis Bacon ) • Administer additional COVID- 1 9 funding • Ensure deadlines are met for timeliness, reporting , and applications J • Ongoing training � • Process improvements • Coordination with local entitlement communities • Idaho Fair Housing Forum � Ava *llable TOTAL RESOURCES : $ 1 , 322 , 808 Fund *ing pyl 9 Program Year 2021 CV Available funding includes resources from previous years that were unspent as well as the current allocation . PY21 Expenditures TOTAL SPENT : $ 761 , 209 Administrative Costs Admin $58,673 Rental Assistance Public Services Scholarships $39, 128 Homeowner Repair Fairview Ave. Sidewalk Housing Chateau Playground $ 1337875 Locust Grove/Pine Lights Public Facility/ W Chief Joseph Lights Infrastructure CV Admin $4547329 Counseling 6 CARES Act Childcare Scholarships $757203 Mortgage Assistance 0 507000 1007000 1507000 2007000 2507000 Un pent Fun s COMPLETECONTINUINGEma kk • PY19 Fairview Ave. Sidewalk Connection Childcare0 CV • PY20 Locust Grove and Pine Streetlights Roughly $173K to be � � . � _ reallocated to PY21 • PY20 W. Chief Joseph Streetlights PHomeowner Repair* • PY21 Admin alternate projects: PY21 Chateau Park Playground • PY21 Fair Housing E. MHS/MMS Streetlights • PY21 Boys and Girls Club Scholarships Homebuyer Assistance • PY21 Emergency Rental Assistance • CV Admin 11pr • CV Youth Counseling On going Efforts Housing Affordability Homelessness and Other • Programs to purchase housing or remain Special Needs in housing that is affordable Collaboration with agencies specializing in • Services to offset basic living expenses those areas (e.g. Our Path Home, Behavioral Health Board, Neighbors United, etc.) Public Housing Other Actions Coordinate efforts with the Ada County • Can/Ada Collaborative Housing Authority • Fair Housing 9 Lead-Based Paint Presentation Public Comment Period Submit to HUD December 13, 2022 December 13-29, 2022 December 30, 2022 Phone Number (208) 489-0575 cont ct U Email Address Reach out to Crystal Campbell for inquiries o comments . ccampbell@meridiancity. org Website https:// meridiancity. org/cdbg/ E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Parks and Recreation Department: Lakeview Golf Course Operations, Capital Projects, and Fee Adjustment Discussion Mayor Robert E. Simison City Council Members: I D IAN X%011 Treg Bernt Brad Hoaglun Joe Borton Jessica D A H a Luke Perreault Cavener Liz Strader ------------------------------------- MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Simison and City Council FROM: Mike Barton,Parks Superintendent DATE: November 27,2022 RE: Lakeview Golf Course Operations/Capital Projects Update and Fee Adjustment Discussion Purpose: It's been several months since we've given the Council an update on the operations and capital projects at Lakeview Golf Course. Additionally, we would like to discuss several changes to the fees we currently charge for trail fees,passes,winter rates, green fees, cart rentals and our range fees. Operations: • On 8-1-22 the City entered into an agreement with Roosters Catering and Eatery to operate the food and beverage section of the business. This agreement was the outcome of an RFP that was advertised. • On 10-1-22 the City took over full management including financial reporting, HR and IT. • Inclusive of initial City funding of the golf course operating account($200k), the fiscal year ending cash balance was $521,123, representing positive cash flow of$321,123 for the two years of operation. Capital Projects: • Irrigation o The irrigation system piping and heads are complete. The pump intake has been installed and the new pump is shipping 12-6. • Cart Paths o The concrete cart paths have been dug out and the base is prepped. Concrete placement is 50% complete. • Irrigation well o The new well is scheduled to be installed this winter Fees: • Trail Fees—This is the fee charged for using your own art or using the course carts an unlimited number of times. o Proposal—Reduce the"use your own cart"trail fee by 50%from 580.000 to 290.000. Using the courses carts would remain unchanged. • Annual Passes o Proposal-Institute anew"non-resident"fee of 10%added to all pass categories. • Winter Rates—The current price reduction for winter play does not discount all groups. o Proposal—Reduce rates 4.00 per 18 hole and 2.00 per 9 holes from 11-15 to 2-28 across all offerings • Greens Fees o Proposal-Increase all greens fees(except passes)by 4% • Cart Fees o Proposal-Increase cart fees by 2.00 per 18 holes and 1.00 per 9 holes per player • Range fees o Proposal-Increase fees for large and small buckets of balls by 10% Lakeview Golf Course Mike Barton, MPR Parks Superintendent DiscussionOperations/Capital Projects Update and Fee Adjustment Operations:operation.for the two years of 9) -(adjusted 12of $370,788 balance was $570,788, representing positive cash flow operating account ($200k), the fiscal year ending cash Inclusive of initial City funding of the golf course including financial reporting, HR, and IT.22, the City took over full management, -1-On 10the outcome of an RFP that was advertised. beverage section of the business. This agreement was Roosters Catering and Eatery to operate the food and 22, the City entered into an agreement with -1-On 8 Capital Projects:Under the local roads 10 timesOver 18 miles of 2” pipe1895 Sprinkler headsOver 21 miles of control wire–Fun Facts On Budget”–“On Time installed this winter.The new well is scheduled to be -Irrigation Well50% complete.out, and the base is prepped. Concrete placement is The concrete cart paths have been dug -Cart Paths6. Ground repair is complete.-new pump is shipping 12complete. The pump intake has been installed, and the The irrigation system piping and heads are -Irrigation Fee Adjustment Discussion:by 10%.Increase fees for large and small buckets of balls -ProposalRange Feesholes per player.Increase cart fees by $2 per 18 holes and $1 per 9 -ProposalCart FeesIncrease all greens fees (except passes) by 4%.-Proposal Greens Fees23 across all offerings.-28-22 to 2-15-from 11Reduce rates $4 per 18 hole and $2 per 9 holes –Proposalnot discount all groups.The current price reduction for winter play does –Winter Rates all pass categories.-Institute a new “non-ProposalAnnual Passes unchanged.from $580 to $290. Using the course’s carts would remain Reduce the “use your own cart” trail fee by 50% –Proposalusing the course carts for an unlimited number of times.This is the fee charged for using your own cart or –Trail Fees Thank you! E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Parks and Recreation Department: Master Plan Update Mayor Robert E. Simison EI'IDLIANI.,*-� City Council Members: Treg Bernt Brad Hoaglun Joe Borton Jessica Perreault H 0 Luke Cavener Liz Strader December 6, 2022 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Robert Simison & Councilmembers FROM: Steve Siddoway, Parks & Recreation Director RE: Parks & Recreation Master Plan Findings Summary and Update Background Art Thatcher with BerryDunn(formerly Green Play)has presented multiple times overthe past year regarding progress on the Parks&Recreation Master Plan process. GreenPlay/Berry Dunn has conducted an extensive public involvement process including interviews,focus groups,and stakeholder meetings. We have also completed the public opinion survey and the facilities inventory and analysis. We have recently been focusing on cost recovery and presented that portion to Council last month. Goals and objectives for the plan have been recently updated using the feedback from the public input. Operations and maintenance have also been recently reviewed as part of the plan. Proposal We will present a final update to Council on the master plan process and seek any feedback. The Parks & Recreation Commission will be reviewing and making a formal recommendation to Council this month. No formal action is needed by Council at this time, but we would like your feedback on the direction as we prepare to bring the plan to Council in January action. Art Thatcher will be in town and will make this presentation in person. - • �E IDf� OF F �J WE ARE WE��.. _ PARKS AND 1 y RECREATION AA Parks and Recreation Master Plan City Council Presentation Z -� b ' BerrylDunn 0 � A5�r�. Tuesday I December 13, 2022 m landdesign. . . . .. . Master Plan Process Strategic Kick-off: - October 10, 2021 Leadership Interviews — October 13-15, 2021 .. . { f. Survey — October 2021 — January 2022 Community Engagement — November 2021 Focus Groups — November 16-18, 2021 Public Presentation — November 18, 2021 1 Inventory — November 2021 Level of Service Analysis — December 2021 r - Findings Presentation — February 23-24, 2022 Organizational Assessment — May — October 2022 Draft Recommendations Presentation — May 2022 PAMS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN Draft & Final Plan Presentation — December 2022 Public Engagement Public Engagement included: • On site November 16-18, 2021 • 6 focus groups consisting of 39 participants • Interviews with ten elected officials and stakeholders • Staff interviews and SWOT Workshop • Parks & Recreation Commission Briefing • Tours of parks and facilities • Open public forum in person and virtually with 18 people in attendance Focus Group Priorities Priorities Connectivity Indoor facility Rectangular fields to support demand Land acquisition Manage growth Create a multi-sport complex (synthetic fields) Upgrade all parks to offer more amenities Useable community center Inclusiveness Providing ample space and accessibility for our growing community Adventure type amenities (Zipline, bowl) SurveyMethodology 3,500 Surveys Mailed (3,444 delivered) Primary methods : 1 = Statistically Valid (Invitation Survey) Mailed survey with an option to complete online through password protected website. 690 Invitation Online and Paper 312 - surveys completed +/- 5.5% Margin of Error L Total 2 = Open Link Survey Surveys Online survey available to all residents of the City of Meridian. 378 - Open Link Surveys Completed Future Needs - Indoor Facilities Future needs for indoor and outdoor facilities are similar across survey years. Q 13: What are the the greatest needs for indoor and outdoor facilities to be added, expanded, or improved in Meridian over the next 5 or 10 years? Indoor Facilities: Rating Category 2021 Survey 2015 Survey Community/recreation center -iM- 6a1 3.9IIZIINK_ 3.7 Indoor aquatics facility AN 3.8 3.8 Field house/gymnasium space 3.6 3.2 Performing arts center 3.3 3.2 Ice rink 3.0 3.0 Future Needs- Outdoor Facilities Q 13: What are the the greatest needs for indoor and outdoor facilities to be added, expanded, or improved in Meridian over the next 5 or 10 years? Outdoor Facilities: Rating Category 2021 Survey 2015 Survey Pathways&trails AIIIIIIIIIIIII 4.3 4.1 Improved park amenities(drinking fountains, 4.1 3.8 restrooms, benches,etc.) Ad Shade structures in parks E 4.0 4.0 Playgrounds 1 3.8 3.7 Lights for outdoor athletic facilities 3.6 3.4 New parks 3.5 3.2 Parking at recreational facilities 3.4 3.1 Splash pads 3.4 3.1 Outdoor athletic fields/courts 3.3 3.1 Dog parks 3.3 3.0 Fishing ponds 3.2 3.1 Pickleball courts 3.0 2.3 Disc golf 129 2.6 Public art in the parks .9 3.1 Exercise stations along trails in parks 2.9 •• 3.2 Rodeo/equestrian facility 2.2 2.2 Allocation of Funding Adding more pathways is still a top priority. However, respondents allocated a greater amount to expanding aquatics and expanding programs and services in 2015. Q 19: With $5 increments being the smallest amount you might use, if you had $100 to spend on parks and recreation facilities, services and/or programs, how would you allocate that $100 across the following categories? Rating Category 2021 Survey 2015 Survey Add more pathways MWI $19.54 $17.69 Make improvements and/or renovate and maintain existing park facilities $14.13 $12.62 Expand aquatics (indoor or outdoor pool, splash $13.91 $19.44 pads, etc) Add new parks $9.46 $8.63 Recreation center, including gym space and related activities $8.43 $8.75 New or expanded Community Center(community class/meeting rooms, activity spaces, etc) $8.23 $6.16 Expand programs and activities (more teen programs, senior programs, etc) $7.58 $11.29 Add outdoor athletic fields and courts $7.27 $7.14 Other enhancements (please specify below) $6.16 $3.27 Provide more City-wide special events $5.30 $5.02 . . ±� di NAT- A Ir 14 ' . t" h ir I- nvento evel Service A f, - k 16 � - � -:�Ff }, `. � _ - I �'• y - .i�'�+ {. ti_.' .��� i � � ' L Rom. - - � ' �I'�• � J ���. {- +F ' � ' + ir 16 {_ r .i+ r�'�fY•� i/ f #. R � i + � � J•. -� .r �7' 1��_ ' _. Y _ _ ti ' ' _ f.. r �, ..} t �� • �� -� � �� s — "�: r �- *� _ � ��/ a � �+'''f .. '• +. j� "� ��,} Y , - � ' y '.•_ } .ice } ; * , ' r� _. f -.�- �y ,���, ';� _ � ��' ( .' ., yam. - �- � -�F a► -ti, i'� ',����- � � r - *�--y ' �. w. .'tir e. •!''. .r IC 61., Park or Facility Acres Ownersh' Classification a °' d m m ° o` G U _ J ii U. i� 0 9y c J U. vl ° O U. OM OCI Z R A A W O aA .O V OC`Settlers Park O- al oil, Discovery Park Julius M.Kleiner Park m - ■■oo■■■■■■■■■■■■■©oo■■■■■©o©oo©■■■■©©■■■■■o©■■■ Bear Creek Park Heroes Park Storey Park 8th Street Park Centennial Park Champion Park Chateau Park m - ■■o■■■©o■■o■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■©o■■■o■©©■■o■■■■■■■ m ■■■■©■o©■■o■■■■■■■■■■■■■■oo■■■o■■■000■■■o■■■■■■ m ■■■o©■o■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■o■o■■o■■o■oo■■■o■■■■■■ m ■■■■■■■©■■■o■■■■■■■■■■■■©■oo■■o■■■■oo■■■■■■■■■■ m� ■■■o■■■©■■■■■■■o■■■■■■■■■o■■■■■■■■■000■■o■■■■■■ © ... ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■o■■■■■■■■o■■■■oo■■■■■ ■ ... ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■o■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ... ■■■■©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■oo■■■oo■■■o■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ . .. ... ■■■■©■■■■o■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■oo■■■o■■■■■o■■■■■■■■■■ Gordonm . .. ... ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■oo■■■o■o■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Keith Bird Legacy Park ■City of Meridian Neighborhood ■■■■o■■■■■■■■■■o■■■■■■■■■oo■■■o■■■■o■■■■■■■■■■■ Renaissance Park ■City of Meridian Neighborhood ■■■■©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■oo■■■o■■■■o■■■■o■■■■■■ ■City of Meridian Neighborhood ■■■■o■■■■■■■■■■o■■■■■■■■■oo■©■o■■■■■o■■■■■■■■■■ Seasons Park ■City of Meridian NeighborhoodSettlers Village Park =�� Neighborhood City of Meridian ■■■■©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■o■■■■■■■■■o■■■■■■■■■■■ Fire Station No.4 Park ■City of Meridian ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■o■■■■■■ Generations Plaza ■City of Meridian ■■o■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■o■■■■■■ Meridian Swimming Pool ■City of MeridianTen Mile Trailhead City of Meridian oo■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Lakeview Golf Course City of Meridian ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■o■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ West Meridian Regional Park Property m ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Meridian Subtotal 'I 1 1 I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��2 15 16 8 110000■■0 11 .■■■■■■■■` 10 Inventory Summary (Other Providers) r Heritage Middle School Ball Fields 6 West Ada School D Sports Parks 4 1 Jabil Fields 8 West Ada School D Sports Parks 2 USBR Undeveloped 31 Bureau of Reclarnal Undeveloped C.F.McDevitt Park 39 Boise Neighborhood Park 1 7 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Cameron Park 1 Boise Neighborhood Park 1 1 Cottonwood Park 8 Boise Neighborhood Park 2 1 1 1 Peppermint Park 7 Boise Neighborhood Park 1 1 1 1 1 1 Sycamore Park 7 Boise Neighborhood Park 1 1 1 is Inventory Summary (Schools) F1W Barbara Morgan Stem Academy 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Central Academy 1 Chaparral Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 1 Chief Joseph Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 Compass Public Charter School Crossroads Middle School 1 1 1 Discovery Elementary School 1 1 1 1 Heritage Middle School 1 1 1 1 1 Hillsdale Elementary School 1 1 1 Hunter Elementary School 1 1 1 1 Lewis&Clark Middle School 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lowell Scott Middle School 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mary McPherson Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 1 Meridian Academy 1 1 Meridian Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 Meridian High School 3 3 6 1 Meridian Middle School 1 1 1 1 1 Mountain View High School 3 4 2 6 1 Paramount Elementary School 1 1 1 1 Pathways Middle School 1 1 1 Pepper Ridge Elementary School 1 1 1 1 Peregrine Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 Pioneer School of the Arts 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ponderosa Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Prospect Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 Renaissance High School River Valley Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rocky Mountain High School 3 4 6 1 Sawtooth Middle School 1 1 1 1 1 1 Siena Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 1 Spalding STEM Academy 1 1 1 1 1 Ustick Elementary School 1 1 1 1 1 Victory Middle School 2 2 2 6 1 Willow Creek Elementary 1 1 1 1 1 1 Future School A Future School B Future School C Future School D Future School E Future School F Future School G Future School H Inventory Summary WHOA and Private Facilities) . • . . 6 30 1 9 • 15 1 • 1 1 • • • 5 • • 109 • • : 6 4 • 89 • 2 49 • 5 Volleyball Co�M.� 4 1 • • 4 Year Population � : • City Limit (Acres) • # of Sites (Parks, Facilties, etc.) Total # of Components Total GRASP® Value (Entire System) • • GRASP® Inde Ave. Score per Site • % of Total Area w/LOS >0 ' . • : ' , Average LOS per Acres Serve • • Components Per Capita Average LOS/Population Density Population Density,(per acre) % of Population with Walkable Target Access • : ' . � ' . People per Park • • • Park per 1 k People Mapping Location and Quality of Components KI•Ilii Bard I IIH14. N 0 Y..*r 0 10 Nrgri Rom. AM W LMx4owof, P40*GNOMNFk: ffRs aR6 IIeF* �•Firr�wiV +-rl++Y rY+ Y��i 11r " lire w u.�Y4 Ni4 .�wr.Yr.e.Y R TYiRprCYryFyyW v—W�r+l/=++IsrrY 7-wqIFTRwe4Lnl� .ir..F FDLuly& Orr of Wmr-c-1R ' In YRn!SIrT�}l Cf u�xt�� fR- }Fr I -WSW- 8ior1F37+'t aqd£aeRewlSfwdr Seo+rs: ,,ff[[�� w 4 1 i 4iBh5F. - t ti t„ice 3 -TrmICaltiwctlRM # M4* 1 arrM+nrn 3 -i—m 4 -7etlanrr # Miff • .hlr.ft t 0er.CT40n r 7f.rltr # r to,Mew,E me ro k e C% 4qr'n r+�rrye'oIV Uc Jo I#aw YIAW= M Cw 2 l I Harp sawl fl FWM4 Ards CI* ] 3 i IAeF 11fi Cw a 3 l gr:rRr�fy-f CL7! t � 3 NOV FARM 1ils a a 1 lUWNN{L"M Oft 1 r 1 Pbokar ass 2 1 1 klr=vo k-?td PIfr FMft LIW CVQ # a 4 IbA tr Ifs. Ci1L ! 2 1 �Flrr.Mf�W�r'�iuRr!{iow.Wrl�Mrfrfr/QIl.�K • Parks are very consistent across the board. • Parks are very well-maintained with high standards • Restrooms are probably the cleanest of any system I have been to Al • Noted: most of the parks have public art - This was a recommendation from the last plan to try and create identity for each individual park nve nto ry Many of the parks can benefit aesthetically from increased use of berms and - landforms Site visits Noted: addition of bike repair stations in many parks - • Turf conditions are excellent • There seems to be a high priority to plant trees in many of the parks ; , The Meridian System M.Yow Creak ''dS Fiamcrl:ery I �t�r� Lapacy"nr7- FAlymplrne - .,_, 4 ra• Fkmrn�arY •+ ,� - �� I Bulchn C .'MeOw�l I �yhgq[ II f'I#I4s ' W i1u r , � Cott dorw d a - PrY • Cameron -- leae FI.Iske,r drk _ Park �� _ I�-- � r � la•�S �[ ; hemp n-'-+= - . .I v I Yen r1Jt j,.ree - Pork II ly'Park.�. I 1 rblus PA. nor f I,ateav a sa��e - - rk _r W),Oan Nllepe Park I�irl w Irferkilen U4,a,y iMlrUi RegloridlPark' - -- M41d1' e� v SOrGOrCdflMf Properly b VaPfex CirMn SchoaP ' Legend Ire[ 8"A&Gyre Cu r.., ffE��GY6PIF WkIrY C#P11N! �? rndoor FaNity ark tm o plea L C#I'IN rk Lkih[InpM449,114ahwav - CltpHe Proposed i =-'liarrFroaarr CharnBu of A!c rld - �' Academy �reewayl trr{ersrel■ �wlmmleq}o1o1 ey Nrk Sycamorr —Alg hwvy j . ^`' I Perk —1IeJorStreeir Raed 1f - - G[ABFSIf6Y1i Laka.'River r Mroern i +CAY oT Mrrldnn - UA0 +.a,pdodHerrla Pep eimlrit W*okrn Ado rtecrrN r�lm Ilia Park N "r" ark 4 - —. ''hr04WA Add�Cndde WGjary _. rk � Flee 4on mtrkrt NWM stbow NoA Pe rk @L"lu err RFdrmilim .ac hoar 1 bloltiorkz - _ 11� irSeH48r5re WErldlen Lily Uffift ark MCA 53 1 2 fib*# ' I r. _ kl.pF4oasedFoCryoIMw3d o-ElrtheOMAPE-imm �' —� - The Nadi l•mnbd FcF Flnnrp891ewu PwPosaGary. - 'I —ry ="w RAW ToThD PrON O[wrmml Fa krep f'UML I.4e.leed Elmo"E1PY Wry 8W.1y In SM r.Wf dT+araMr�er�crFwmThoeo�5++,.+.OeNyp I M ham ®9wr rlr+IndWe WvalUwden,E&Ia,CRmPE rare-dow"M72 � i'�Lii[ r Nld 1?w7MWlgtrrl _____-.-_ _ _ GRASP® Walkable Access LrozRd �aae"o.r+nr,w L�r.9.A k.h,rx r,t_• __wIII I r—dr Tvpt �.F r 1m Aoc.a.,NYln 10 E.wb� _ II f I P*h loth-"�' ,Hatl % of Population with Walkable Access to nr� FYIxr M...{rlla.d Outdoor Recreation F n+M1"r�r �IAno aa�tl xdod} Worm Id. �Ytiyy�{bpmpn 9FloW h' Pr4.YI�Ll11'41 w+n r4 Fltnrtih o�.n Cass WOYm Ad.Sclwo- rir�Fe IIwrr .'•' ++''� L... - wudd OIr 1Yl -'•- C•�llh+i F'f F'• BIYNYJ V AWWOa Percent Total Area =0 -SPutr.na.nrk}41nh Percent Total Area >0 AND - -- •—"---�`••-�-�-- -'� , _ - _T= •C— oa I C <TargetScore 68 Percent Total Area >=Tar et 32016 Pk,k Score r w-.� F - r 9 H 1 3 I ry n'�odhc[4'Vlwrr ti=xvt5eF4+.n I•_ ly.Y,pYWfy6}FO Fr..y r4,.,+.r pr[•xe..yh —� I FY�.4rh2Y rqd Omer Fa�G✓rY «a sr•.r r�..r>rl+rnao.a�. 7n+OIDUOYF.y.�o-yJlowCRtir UF4/. fJVLM 9+.a o �FYY iGP�O rru. i.w•a�F]W! T =m-. GRASP® Neighborhood Access w.,Ma Mlandll{F 5rr4hc• I wt47Y'o O.F WkIM HOA Pork% � } t- L *P. 3 'UNe ArOMi•nh111 i{IC FALNIIIE I! MR 411110 Ilk hi -114.1il1—� hl,. �s' P , '� r p� +"'" " ; r ,� % of Population with IdI.rI.+Ylr ,1Y = Fps � h""r I`. Neighborhood Access hn ` 1 - - kl. _� ' '' -� "° " to Outdoor Recreation 'F • ~ry 111 ..� - —YtiW iv+XrRartl Ij Talkwla y 7M hlkS -. 6nw.7r,+ae:Rdrd IP- 1(I'rri Uhl�Rkw1.11iirh �.. r� an Nl�lrlr �Y I tdy.I r..Idlin LgwlkF ' ' 1411n1S" LIII.Y+If1r -r oµR4lCi Ird�lYr1I r4�rI "lich -�lw. m p 41ri1 PiM 1rl�u 4.tirl� rN+Iwx..�1 IWI�rr'0k4 Mi 1 �. �• 9% FI�SMr II.. 4 /-4u w+a'r f.n.-I.r,.Sr Nip: �RAP-~Qklri.k 40 i4ra..WHMPI I r+ jIYI IN naiAh I:..n�m.n•7 i�.nr.r �ylliWr11r1 li Ywp r I •nlwl Tall ' A kn1Yf `•rJ- Y I+41111� 1 �rr{Iy�Y Jr} yrup� CRI�r 4N7-hln— :=.Mrl MD. Rrm n lY.m Ih 1rk Pi�Y ! k fYYY IZArk.r!ti I' - ' '•'h r +� Wnalr ftn L 11 4`' � I MlrirllArF 6rY44.• �— r lip rRI11r1rviM1•'r4- M rrf FIFtKl` Percent Total Area =0 lrvr. . ' , �� Percent Total Area >0 AND <Target Score t, t ���,► •I Percent Total Area >=Target Score W € � I tart.. I!�lr�d InaM MiP 'P.P. R,11rli flf Mt I .�i11r1 1I[��1'�y Ji t r A%Irk.IIIIAYY i �.rwlk-i 4'r.s...nlVo-w+.1^+r .tixrlrw 1111...,..rl:wka.rrlr4Yl,s�.Yr dill, Ilk{IariWk�r.Yk�lywu gun y. �. dlwMr is�+b L i�I.rrl.r+l,tiln„+6w l4.y r,1Nn �� I - �vAtlYrs71n71! FYIY+.1%hrY.M arxr.r..FAR J_'2uia ti 1.� Recurring Themes • Continue to create a connected community through pathway development • Maintain quality of maintenance level of service and funding • Find future locations for parks to stay ahead of future development and in underserved areas of the community • Keep up with future changing demographics that comes with growth • Community center/recreation center are the community's greatest need for indoor facilities • Pathways and trails are the community's greatest need for outdoor facilities • Shade and communication are the top 2 areas to address to increase participation • Email and social media are top 2 best ways to communicate about programs band services Goals a • Objectives Goal 1: Continue to Improve Organizational Efficiencies Objective 1.1: Maintain existing level of service goal Objective 1.2: Enhance and improve internal and external communication regarding department activities and services Objective 1.3: Maintain existing quality standards for facilities and amenities Objective 1A Utilize technology to improve customer service and efficiencies Objective 1.5: Increase potential partnerships within the community Objective 1.6: Staff appropriately to meet demand and maintain established quality of service Goals and Objectives Goal 2: Maintain and Improve Facilities and Amenities Objective 2.1 Maintain and improve existing facilities Objective 2.2: Expand pathways and connectivity Objective 2.3: Add indoor recreation space Objective 2.4: Develop new amenities at new and existing parks based on level of service analysis Objective 2.5: Acquire new land for parks Objective 2.6: Evaluate parking at parks, events, and scheduled activities Goals and Objectives Goal 2: Maintain and Improve Facilities and Amenities continued Objective 2.7: Continue to monitor ADA needs of the community Objective 2.8: Upgrade comfort, convenience, and customer service amenities to existing facilities Objective 2.9: Create park identity in existing and new parks Objective 2.10: Address current and future needs for athletic fields Objective 2.11: Consider programming needs when adding new components to existing parks or when developing new parks Objective 2.12: Maintain component-based inventory and level of service standards Objective 2.13: Continue to maintain life cycle replacement plan Goals and Objectives Goal 3: Continue to Improve Programs and Service Delivery Objective 3.1: Continue to address recreational programming and activity needs of the community Goal 4: Increase Financial Opportunities Objective 4.1 Increase special event and activities sponsorships Objective 4.2: Evaluate Impact Fee Ordinance Objective 4.3: Pursue grant and philanthropic opportunities Objective 4A Implement a cost recovery and pricing policy Thank You For Your Time • Consideration I, Art Thatcher, M PA, CPRP �- - Direct (mobile): 757-592-3103 .* F Art.thatcher@berrydunn.com WE ARE Manager PARKS AND 'r rRECREATION Tom Diehl CPRP Direct (mobile): 804-833-6994 Tom.diehlC@berryuunn.com Project Manager/Consultant GreenPlay is now BerryDunn RRC r:r b a J W A0IATE .S... m ISMIde5ign AAA