2022-07-21 Joe and Donna Hardman neighborhood letter
Charlene Way
From:joehfour@aol.com
Sent:Thursday, July 21, 2022 9:39 AM
To:City Clerk
Subject:Impressive East Ridge Modifications
Attachments:East Ridge Neighborhood Letter.pdf
External Sender - Please use caution with links or attachments.
City of Meridian Mayor and City Council:
Attached is a letter, in addition to our previously submitted letter, in support of our neighbors and neighborhood, in
respectfully requesting you deny the request to remove the single-level limitation on single-family homes within
Impressive East Ridge 2 and 3 Village.
Thank you for your time, and consideration of this issue.
Respectfully,
Joe and Donna Hardman
1
July 20, 2021
Joseph A and Donna L Hardman
6217 S Bosch Way
Meridian, ID 83642
City of Meridian
33 E. Broadway Ave.,
Suite 102
Meridian Id 83642
Dear Mayor & City Council
Re: Impressive East Ridge Development Agreement Modifications, H-2020-0037 East Ridge
Subdivision
We are adding our names to this letter, in addition to the one we previously submitted,to
join our neighbors in requesting the Meridian City Council deny the Development Agreement
Modification to remove single-level limitation on single family residences within Impressive
East Ridge Subdivision No. Z and No. 3 (Village Product Area) as submitted.
On October 19, 2017, four (4) citizens attended the Planning & Zoning Commission Public
Hearing and on November 28, 2017, thirty-eight (38) citizens attended the City Council Public
Hearing in opposition of the Annexation and Zoning (AZ) and Preliminary Plat (PP). Some of the
concerns raised by both public testimony and written testimony included:
• Additional Traffic
• Density of Overall Development
• Feasibility of Age-restricted Housing
• Transition from the Surrounding Neighborhoods and the Transition from the
Age-restricted Lots
• Concerns how the Blackrock Neighborhood were ignored by the Developer
Unfortunately, the Planning Commission and City Council voted to approve the 40.99-acre AR
and PP with R-4 and R-15 zoning districts without addressing the neighborhood concerns.
On June 5, 2018,the City of Meridian and DevCo, LLC entered into Development Agreement,
and on July 17, 2018, City Council approved the first Final Plat.The intent of the Agreement and
Final Plat is to set clear direction as to conditions, and expectations for what is to be built, along
with the confidence that what is proposed meets the intent of R-4 & R-15 zoning.
City of Meridian Med-High Density R-15 Design Considerations states the following:
"Residential developments should orient to surrounding uses, including residential and
non-residential areas, in a way that encourages compatible development patterns, character,
and appearances."
"Appropriately address the critical issues of site layout that influence a compatible and
integrated neighborhood character, including, but not limited to, vehicular access, pedestrian
connectivity, building orientations, and common spaces"
Development Agreement (H2O17-0129) states "The applicant shall provide a master grading
plan and drainage plan for the site with the first final plat application"
The first Final Plat Application did not include a Master Grading Plan. The applicant submitted
drainage calculations, Conceptual Engineering Plan, Landscape Plan and Final Plat. The
Conceptual Engineering Plan showed existing ground elevations, lot layouts and street
locations, but there was no vertical design component other than a hinge line. Without knowing
proposed lot elevations there is no way to understand the vertical transition between Village
Lots and Estate Lots. Vertical transition is a critical component when determining lot
orientation, landscaping, fencing, and building setbacks.
Today Village Lots are upwards to, and in some locations greater than 13 ft. vertically above the
Estate Lots. Village houses are constructed within 10 ft. of the rear property line, and existing
fencing between lots is a 4 ft. open vision fence. Open vision fencing is typically used when lots
are adjacent to public right-of-way, open space, and public parks. It is hard to believe, and hard
to accept that something this blatantly wrong can get to this point. I've attached a picture (see
attached) of my neighbors back yard. Would you consider this meeting the R-15 Design
Considerations of appropriately addressing the critical issues of site layout that influence a
compatible and integrated neighborhood character?
The application before you takes this already unbearable situation and makes it worse.This
application to remove single-level limitation on a single-family residence introduces changes to
roof lines, windows/lighting, and noise.
Because there is an average of a 13-foot vertical height difference from Estate Lots to Village
Lots and with a maximum roof height of 25 ft. creates a monotonous wall (38-foot) effect
concern.Today only one (1) house plan (Glendale) has a roof height of 25 ft. for the full width of
the house. This application proposes four (4) house plans (Glendale, Chandler, Pima and Tempe)
to have a 25 ft. roof height for nearly the full width of the house. If these houses were
constructed next to each other it would create an undesirable wall effect to Estate Lots Block 2,
Lots 3-16 & Block 3, Lots 19-21 (17 lots total).
The addition of Bonus Rooms/Bedrooms will have an increase in home occupants causing
increased noise from a small 10 ft. backyard. Because the existing condition between Village
Lots and Estates Lots is already intrusive, the addition of Bonus Rooms/Bedrooms will only
make it worse.
Bonus Rooms/Bedrooms with windows will also allow an additional location for neighbors to
look directly down into our yards and homes.
It is obvious that the existing situation between Village Lots and Estates Lots is not good and
does not align with the City of Meridian Med-High Density R-15 Design Considerations. I
believe the applicant's proposed changes will only make things worse. I believe that the
majority of the issues being raised today are similar to the Transition from the Age-restricted
Lots issues raised by Blackrock neighbors in 2017. I also believe it's not too late to make things
correct by including modifications as part of the proposed amendment to the Development
Agreement.
Between now and the time of the Public Hearing we ask you to truly think about these
concerning issues which come to you as part of this application.
Thank you for taking the time to read this letter and thank you for considering the information
before you.
Respectfully,
Josep A Hardman
Donna L Hardman
'�■�■r���■■#,!■�■�■ ���i�.... .�!l�1�!!l����'■� !!�!!!■ss�*�+swaiwr�w�rr►�ws�s!?!ari�elP.�l� '�! ���L/,
M73�.
h"r 4 -
p a-i
�t
.. ... _ :.,. ;... •� i ., ,.ram ... .