Loading...
2022-05-24 Work Session CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, May 24, 2022 at 4:30 PM Minutes ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Councilwoman Liz Strader Councilman Treg Bernt Councilwoman Jessica Perreault Councilman Luke Cavener Councilman Brad Hoaglun Mayor Robert E. Simison ABSENT Councilman Joe Borton ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] Approved Motion to approve the Consent Agenda (with the exception of item remove from Consent - previously Item 9) made by Councilman Hoaglun, Seconded by Councilman Bernt. Voting Yea: Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Bernt, Councilwoman Perreault, Councilman Cavener, Councilman Hoaglun 1. Approve Minutes of the May 10, 2022 City Council Work Session 2. Tetherow Crossing Water Main Easement 3. The Reserve Subdivision North Pedestrian Pathway Easement 4. The Reserve Subdivision South Pedestrian Pathway Easement 5. Tustin Subdivision North Pedestrian Pathway Easement 6. Tustin Subdivision South Pedestrian Pathway Easement 7. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Lavender Heights Development Agreement Modification (H-2022-0017) by Breckon Land Design, Located at 2160 E. Lake Hazel Rd., at the Northeast Corner of E. Lake Hazel Rd. and S. Bloomerang Ave. 8. Development Agreement (Vanguard Village H-2021-0081) Between the City of Meridian and Meridian 118, LLC for Property Generally Located 1/4 Mile South of W. Franklin Rd. and S. Ten Mile Rd. 10. Parks and Recreation Department: Agreement with Killer Whales Swim Team for Use of Meridian Community Swimming Pool Between the City of Meridian and the Meridian Killer Whales Swim Team, Inc. 11. Fiscal Year 2022 Net-Zero Budget Amendment in the Amount of $3000.00 to Accept Donated Revenue to offset Mayor's Walking Club Related Expenses 12. Resolution No. 22-2328: A Resolution of the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Meridian, Reappointing Tom LeClaire to Seat 8 and Ryan Lancaster to Seat 9 of the Meridian Transportation Commission; and Providing an Effective Date 13. City of Meridian Financial Report - April 2022 ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] 9. Intergovernmental Agreement with Ada County Highway District & Idaho Transportation Department for Linder Road Overpass and Widening Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Hoaglun, Seconded by Councilman Bernt. Voting Yea: Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Bernt, Councilwoman Perreault, Councilman Cavener, Councilman Hoaglun DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS \[Action Item\] 14. Ada County Assessor Annual Report 15. Valley Regional Transit: 30 Pine Route and Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Request 16. Public Works: Two Percent (2%) Water and Sewer Utility Rate Increase Discussion ADJOURNMENT 5:47 pm Item#3. Meridian City Council Work Session May 24, 2022. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 4:31 p.m., Tuesday, May 24, 2022, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Luke Cavener, Treg Bernt, Jessica Perreault, Brad Hoaglun and Liz Strader. Members Absent: Joe Borton. Also present: Chris Johnson, Bill Nary, Caleb Hood, Laurelei McVey, Kyle Radek, Scott Colaianni, Joe Bongiorno and Dean Willis. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE Liz Strader Joe Borton _X_ Brad Hoaglun _X_Treg Bernt X Jessica Perreault _X_ Luke Cavener _X Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Council, we will call the meeting to order. For the record it is Tuesday, May 24th at 4:31 p.m. We will begin this afternoon's work session with roll call attendance. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Simison: Next item is adoption of the agenda. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I move adoption of the agenda as published. Bernt: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as published. Is there any discussion? Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Hoaglun: Council Woman Perreault, I think your motion will be made after we adopt the agenda for -- on the next one. Is there any other discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the agenda is adopted. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Page 57 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page 2- — CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] 1. Approve Minutes of the May 10, 2022 City Council Work Session 2. Tetherow Crossing Water Main Easement 3. The Reserve Subdivision North Pedestrian Pathway Easement 4. The Reserve Subdivision South Pedestrian Pathway Easement 5. Tustin Subdivision North Pedestrian Pathway Easement 6. Tustin Subdivision South Pedestrian Pathway Easement 7. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Lavender Heights Development Agreement Modification (H-2022-0017) by Breckon Land Design, Located at 2160 E. Lake Hazel Rd., at the Northeast Corner of E. Lake Hazel Rd. and S. Bloomerang Ave. 8. Development Agreement (Vanguard Village H-2021-0081) Between the City of Meridian and Meridian 118, LLC for Property Generally Located 1/4 Mile South of W. Franklin Rd. and S. Ten Mile Rd. 10. Parks and Recreation Department: Agreement with Killer Whales Swim Team for Use of Meridian Community Swimming Pool Between the City of Meridian and the Meridian Killer Whales Swim Team, Inc. 11. Fiscal Year 2022 Net-Zero Budget Amendment in the Amount of $3000.00 to Accept Donated Revenue to offset Mayor's Walking Club Related Expenses 12. Resolution No. 22-2328: A Resolution of the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Meridian, Reappointing Tom LeClaire to Seat 8 and Ryan Lancaster to Seat 9 of the Meridian Transportation Commission; and Providing an Effective Date 13. City of Meridian Financial Report -April 2022 Simison: Next item up is the Consent Agenda. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Page 58 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page 3-— Perreault: Mr. Mayor, I would like to move Item No. 9, the Intergovernmental Agreement with the Ada County Highway District from the Consent Agenda to Item 17 for Council discussion. Simison: Move it to the Consent -- right after this. Yeah. Okay. Have a motion. Do I have a second? Cavener: Second. Strader: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to move Item 9 to items moved from the Consent Agenda. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the item is moved. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Simison: Do I have a motion to approve the Consent Agenda? Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I move approval of -- of the Consent Agenda as amended with the removal of Item No. 9 and for the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest. Bernt: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the Consent Agenda is approved, except for Item 9. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] 9. Intergovernmental Agreement with Ada County Highway District & Idaho Transportation Department for Linder Road Overpass and Widening Simison: Which we will now consider Item 9 under items moved from the Consent Agenda. Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: You want -- you would like me to start the discussion? Simison: Yes. Page 59 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page 4 of— Perreault: Okay. So, in regard to the intergovernmental agreement, I have not heard from my fellow Council Members their thoughts on the -- the contract, the scope of work, and we -- we do already have a commitment for that two and a half million in our budget, which was voted on, but I just thought it would be wise for us to potentially put on record verbal agreement for this, since it's such a significant decision. So, for myself I have had conversations with the Mayor about the funding of the other two transportation departments that will be involved in this process, ACHD and ITD, and I am really wanting to know the timing of -- the anticipated timing from ACHD on when they might be able to make the financial commitment to the project. So, that's the conversations that I have had with Mayor. I don't know if there is anything else that my fellow Council Members would like to ask or add in that regard. Just, basically, wanted to open it up if there was any conversation that needed to be had before we voted on it. Simison: Council, questions, comments? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. And maybe just a comment. You know, I was pretty encouraged that there is a willingness to move forward and that ACHD and ITD have come to, you know, an agreement themselves on how to sort of work together in terms of the design and and scope of that. I do think we are going to be stepping through this, so I -- I think it's to me it's not out of order that all of the funding pieces haven't been totally lined up at this point. I would look to the Mayor for more commentary on that, but I -- I -- at least I feel comfortable moving forward that, you know, this is kind of the step that we are going to take next and, then, they will be solidifying their funding and putting this into their kind of plans, especially as it relates to other funding sources that both of them have. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Yeah. We knew, you know, when this discussion that you initiated began that this -- this was a project that was needed, but it really wasn't on -- very high on their radar. Lots of -- lots of things out there and by bringing some money to the table we were able to elevate that and it -- it's -- it would be a great benefit to our community and the fact that we were able to use that funding to initiate design work, which is going to take 18 months, that does allow them time to -- to move things forward and get things lined up and, you know, you can never predict the future when it comes to other agencies and whatnot, but it does put it in a place that is -- is much better than it would be if we had not done anything. So, I think it was a good move by the Mayor and Council to -- to do that and -- and I think we will continue to see that move forward at a -- at a rate they are comfortable and -- and not -- not -- not be stalled out. So, I'm -- I'm comfortable with -- going with this -- this agreement at this time. Page 60 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page 5 of 26 Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Maybe one additional comment. I do think it's really to our benefit to have ITD and ACHD working together, especially because ACHD has new pedestrian design guidelines and they will be implementing those and I think that this is really good that they are working together and -- as opposed to us trying to work with each of them separately. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I don't have anything else to offer, just -- I thank Council Member Perreault for pulling this off Consent. It is a big dollar amount and I think that we all are in agreement, but continue to hear that vocal support from my other Council Members is reassuring and it reaffirms that we are going to have to continue to be the leader on this likely moving forward. So, thank you, Council Member, for asking this to be pulled off and I'm -- I agree with the other comments from the Council Members. Simison: And just to follow up on the funding, you are going to continue to hear me advocate for funding from all sources. I'm just going to leave it there for now, but all sources as it relates to advancing this project that's important and critical for our community, so -- Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Thank you. Yeah. I primarily just -- you know, we -- we have the -- the funds set aside in the budget, but this really gives permission to now actually start spending them, so I think that's primarily the reason I wanted to just hear from Fellow Council that that this is indeed -- everyone is ready to move forward and actually execute on it. So, thank you very much to everyone and I appreciate the -- the comments. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Thank you, Council Woman Perreault, and with that, then, I move that we adopt the intergovernmental agreement with Ada County Highway District and Idaho Transportation Department for the Linder Road overpass and widening. Bernt: Second the motion. Page 61 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page 6- — Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve the intergovernmental agreement. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the agreement is -- is agreed to. Thank you. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS [Action Item] 14. Ada County Assessor Annual Report Simison: So, next item up is Item 14, which is annual report from Ada County Assessor Robert McQuade. Always a favorite this time of year. So, Mr. McQuade, welcome. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: Mr. McQuade, we -- we only want good news. Only good news today. House -- house -- house -- you know, prices of homes are dropping. We have a ton of inventory. That type of information. That's what we are looking for. McQuade: That's also on page two and seven of -- I'm going to set my watch, because I just want to go ten minutes and not over that. There we go. This is probably my 26th visit here to Meridian to do an assessment briefing. You were one of the very first agencies that did that. So, as you look back over that 25 years, quarter of a century, Meridian has changed so much, it is just -- it's -- I'm just amazed and it is so neat what's going on over here. With that we are sending out our assessment notices. They are going out next week. Actually, this week. We will probably start getting calls -- I'm going to guess Tuesday and, then, Wednesday a lot of calls. Last year we had a 26 percent increase in assessed values. The highest we have ever had. But yet it was the fewest number of appeals that we had had in over two decades. Very small number of appeals. And we attribute that to probably the public, because of the -- the great job that local media has been doing that people really understood what was going on in the single family residential market. Couple of things I just want to point out. One of them just being what is it the assessor does. People always say are you the tax collector. No. That's the treasurer's job and she doesn't like it when people call me the -- the tax collector. But it's what the assessor does -- our job is we allocate the taxes. We -- here in Meridian, for example, we will -- based upon our valuation we will determine which -- each individual who owns property -- for each property what their portion of tax is going to be for the city of Meridian's budget based upon the valuation that we make. So, we take that role very seriously. We don't want to over assess someone. If we do they are paying more than their fair share. We don't want to under assess someone, because the rest of us will be picking that up. So, that's what the assessor does. We don't collect taxes. We allocate taxes. How close are values to actual property sales? As you can see here in -- in 2021 single family residential we were about 24 -- 94 percent of what we -- the expected sales price would have been and statistically that would have been 94 percent and commercial Page 62 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page , of 26 is 97 percent. As you can see it in 2020 we were right at 94 percent and 94 percent and those numbers are assessment level. We have to be at hundred percent, plus or minus ten percent. But it's really important -- we are going to come back to assessment level in just a moment here. So, getting into the values. The total market value that we have is a little bit less than -- than 29 billion dollars. That's not the taxable value. The potential taxable value we need to take out the homestead exemption, it's four billion. Other exemptions 48 million and those exemptions -- at the time we did this we hadn't received all the exemptions. The commissioners have until the 18th -- or the 15th of May to get all of the exemptions processed. So, that number now is probably closer to zero. Operating property 228 million. Operating property, that's the property that's owned by utilities. A real good example in Meridian would be the railroad tracks. That's operating property. The tax commission assesses those and they do a very different method. They call it the unitary value. They will value the entire Union Pacific Railroad and, then, they decide what portion of that belongs in Idaho and, then, based upon line miles of track they will allocate that to the different taxing authorities and we don't get those numbers from the Tax Commission until October -- or until August and they will actually be incorporated when the levees are being certified. So, you have potential -- potential taxable value of about 25 billion dollars. On the residential side 22 point -- about 23 billion dollars. That's up 40 percent compared to 2021 and what's -- what's driving this -- before I get into the market drivers, the trends. The assessed value here in Meridian of single family residential is 33 percent. It's a little bit higher than the county median value. The county median value is right at 30 -- 30 -- 30, 31 percent. So, Meridian is a little bit higher. But when you look at all of the -- the demand for single family residential property over here in Meridian, that really shouldn't be much of a surprise that there is a little bit higher median value. Market drivers in -- in migration. Land values. We can't even keep up with the land values. We do our best. I think we do a good job. But it's -- it's changing so fast, it's -- it's -- we are doing a good job I think on the assessments here. Commercial values. Real property is just a little bit less than six billion. That's up 30 percent from 29 percent. Business personal property. This is one of the few areas where the percent change is a positive number. Most of the other places is a negative number, albeit maybe one percent, one and a half percent, and that is that business personal property -- several years ago they had a hundred thousand dollar exemption -- the first one hundred thousand. That was changed to 250,000 dollars. So, more and more business personal property is coming off the rolls and that is not surprising. I know that there are certain interests that think business personal property should be completely taken off, because the -- the difficulties in assessing it. That -- that is a deterrent for businesses coming into the state. So, it wouldn't surprise me at some point in time, five, ten years, that business personal property will be a thing of the past. This -- the -- the number, by the way, that 250,000, is going to come off, the state is going to be reimbursing the taxing authorities of that, so it's not a loss, but that money will, then, be fixed in the future. So, total commercial property is six billion. That's up about 28 percent. New construction. That's an important number, because that's how much we -- the county and the cities and other taxing authorities -- we can increase our budget by three percent and, then, add the new construction value on that. That has been changed. You don't get the whole new construction, it's 90 percent of the new construction, but it's how that works if your budget will say at a million dollars and you took the new construction value times last year's levy Page 63 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page 8 of 26 and we will say that a hundred thousand dollars, you can now budget up to a -- up to a million one hundred thousand dollars, plus the three percent. There are some people that feel that's one of the real drivers for local government, being able for their -- their taxes going up and I really do think new construction -- I have seen a model where new construction really does pay for growth. So, residential construction is 941 million dollars. The total at the bottom -- you will see there at the bottom and the third column over. Residential is 503 million. It's a little bit off last year, 510 million. Commercial up five percent to 322 million. And, then, new subdivisions and change of status and -- and change of use of land, that's 99 million. This is the last year land use -- changes in land use will be considered part of new construction. From now on it's just going to be strictly the -- the improvements, the physical structures that were put on the land, that's where the value of new construction will come from, not for the change of use. An example of change of use would be if you had a farm at the beginning of the year and it had been subdivided at the end of the year, that would all be assessed as new construction -- the -- the value as -- as -- as developed land for -- but, again, that's not going to be the -- this the last year. You are not going to see that again in the future years. Urban renewal. You have the Union District at 5.3 million -- is five million percent increase. It's the largest increase. There was just I think an amendment there. That is what caused that to go up to 5.3 billion. Total increment value is high 127 million. That's about -- about 48 percent. Okay. We are just going to wrap up here with overall tax burden and this is where we get into two concepts I really want to discuss. It's really understood -- misunder -- very misunderstood I should say. Tax burden is who pays the taxes, residential or commercial, and you will see here for 2021 residential is --will be paid -- paid 73 percent of the property taxes. Commercial paid 27 percent. People think that that's shifting, because of the way we are assessing that. Our assessments on commercial property are not as accurate, that we are under assessing commercial property. As I -- as I showed you, we are at 97 percent. Year four it was at 94 percent. Some people contend that it's -- we are under assessing and I would just really -- really like to dispel that. But before I get into that you will notice that in 2020 commercial is paying 30 percent. Now that is 27. Residential 70, up to 73. The reason that that change is occurring -- it's just a couple of very good reasons. Number one -- the first reason I want to discuss is -- my ten minutes are up. I will quickly wrap this up. Here you have 47,000 residential parcels here in Meridian, 2,700 commercial parcels. In other words, you have 17 times the number of residential parcels as you do commercial parcels. So, just the sheer number of parcels says that residential is going to be paying more. Residential values is about 23 billion dollars. Commercial is about six billion. So, it's -- residential is four times the value of the commercial and also we are seeing residential increase so much faster. That, of course, is causing that number to get bigger. The increase in residential value this last year was six and a half billion dollars. Commercial 1.3 billion. So, residential increase at five times as the commercial. So, that's why the commercial property is paying a higher -- or is a lower percentage of property tax. Not because we are under assessing, but because we have a lot larger volume of residential properties and the dollar volume is so much higher. That said, some people feel that we are not assessing them -- them equally. That is a concept called level. So, we have burden, whose is paying, and, then, we have the level. I have no control over the burden at all. I am not going to decide who is going to -- you know, if something is going to be subdivided. Who is going to be buying houses. Page 64 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page 9 of— Commercial properties. I have no control over that at all. We just look at the market and interpret it. But what we do have control over that is the assessment level. How close are we to one hundred percent and you can see as we started out with saying residential is 94 percent, right for '21, commercial is 97 percent. So, I just really want to make that clear that -- that the assessor controls the level, but not the tax burden. And with that I'm going to draw this presentation to a close. It will be my last and final presentation. I have really enjoyed my visits out here and if you don't mind maybe for next year at this time if I'm feeling homesick maybe I can just stop by and sit and see what's going on. Mr. Mayor and Council Members, that concludes my presentation. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Mr. McQuade, I'm sorry I'm not here in the room personally to just thank you and commend you for your many years of service to the county. This information is important and I look forward to your report every year and I think it goes without saying you are always welcome in Council Chambers officially or unofficially. We would love to see you. Just one question about this last slide. Maybe it's a two-part question. From your perspective have we -- have you seen that divide in tax burden between residential and commercial over the past five years? Is this a trend that we are seeing a continuance on or is this an anomaly in your perspective? And, then, maybe part two of that is if you know is this similar across the -- the state or is this just -- are we seeing this happen only within Ada county? McQuade: Mr. Mayor and Councilman Cavener, this is something -- this is very similar across the state. The numbers here in Ada County, they -- they range quite a bit. Boise City is probably 65/35. You go over to Kuna and it's about 90 residential and ten. And so that -- that's -- the split is -- is -- that phenomenon is going on statewide. And, then, secondly, this trend has been continuing actually since we came out of the recession in I think about 2009. 2009 we saw -- because single family residential was just collapsing in value, residential and commercial would become very -- commercial was going considerably -- the burden was going up, residential was going down. But ever since we came out of the recession in 2009, 2010, that has been diverging, not to what we have seen this year. This is -- usually it will be a half a percent, one percent, but here where we -- where we are looking at, you know, two or three percent that -- that's a pretty big separation. Cavener: Thank you. McQuade: And thank you for the kind words. I -- it's not very often the assessor gets kind words. Thank you. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Page 65 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page 10 of 26 Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: Bob, thank you so much for being a dedicated public servant for all of these years. You are one of the best and we are certainly going to miss you. Quick question for you -- and I'm sure you have been asked this question multiple times and I'm -- you know and I'm sure that you guys in your office you do projections and what -- what values you know, residential values are going to look like one, two, three years. Do you see this continuing -- the trend continuing to go like it's been in the past? You -- are you seeing it plateau a little bit because of interest rates or whatever? Just wanted to get your perspective on that. McQuade: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Bernt, yes, it's -- first of all we are not very good at projecting. In my office three years ago, four years ago we took this -- all of the managers and the staff, we made projections of where we thought house -- housing prices were going to be. My guess was going to be 550,000 this year and that's where we are and people were just laughing at me, thought how could that possibly be so? We didn't do a very good job. But we do know that-- at least recent data suggests that it's slowing down, but it's still a very brisk pace. I believe it was March of '22 compared to '21 the percent of increase -- I believe it was about 20 percent. Last year at that same time it was about 30 or 35 percent. So, we are seeing -- and, of course, interest rates are going to -- to impact the -- it certainly will impact the -- the -- the growth rate of -- of prices for single family residential. But we are also getting pressure of people still moving here. They want to come here and so that's going to -- I think certainly be some kind of a counterweight to the increased interest rates. Simison: Council, any additional questions or comments? All right. Well, you are not done yet. Councilman Hoaglun, you want to join me at the podium. Bernt: You are not in trouble, Bob. You are okay. McQuade: I was ready to run, but I -- Bernt: I actually saw your face. I saw your face and you are like what is going on here right now. Simison: So, we don't offer much here at the City of Meridian when it comes to recognition, but we -- we do like to give recognition with words where we can of gratitude and, you know, it's not often that we are going to have a lot of public servants that serve for almost 30 years anymore. I don't think that's going to be the trend in public service. Could be wrong, but -- from that standpoint. So, we just have a proclamation that we would like to read in your honor today and, then, I will turn it over to Councilman Hoaglun if that's okay from that standpoint. So, whereas, Robert H. McQuade has provided 28 years of service to Meridian and Ada county, serving as the assessor and has been committed to excellence in public service and whereas Mr. McQuade will be retiring from his position where he has faithfully served the residents and always strived to improve the operations of the Ada County Assessor's Office and whereas Mr. McQuade led efforts Page 66 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page 11 of— to improve accuracy and timeliness of appraisal information, electronic conversion of paper files, and led efforts for the assessor's office to gain and maintain the IAAO Certificate of Excellence and Assessment Administration and whereas Mr. McQuade has been recognized for his contributions and was the recipient of the Mills Adler Award for the Idaho Association of Counties in 2009 and, whereas, the City of Meridian recognizes that through the years Mr. McQuade has served and guided the residents of Ada county with commitment and integrity. Therefore, I, Robert E. -- Robert Simison proclaim May 24th, 2022, to be Robert H. McQuade Day in Meridian and honor the hard work and selfless dedication that Robert H. McQuade has given to help the City of Meriden become a vibrant community and a premier city to live, work, and raise a family. Dated this 24th day of May 2022. So, just a little honor to say thank you for everything that you have done. McQuade: Mr. Mayor, thank you so much. I will take this to the office and show everyone and I will tell you I will always cherish this. I was not -- I was not expecting this and I will always cherish this and it's going to be displayed in a prominent place in my house. Thank you so much. Hoaglun: You still can't run off, Bob. Being elected officials we know what it's like to go to lots of meetings, do lots of presentations, and you are running here and there and so we thought, well, you know, he's going to retire, what's he going to do and we thought, you know, he needs to spend some time with his wife and so the Council and the Mayor we decided to get you -- we signed a card to you, but also a little gift certificate to take you out to dinner somewhere. So, not taxpayer dollars, it's all our money, personal money -- in Meridian, of course. So, we just wanted to give you a nice thank you card and a little gift certificate to express our appreciation for your 28 years of service, your good work for all the residents of this county and particularly in Meridian and we just appreciate what you have done. So, thank you. McQuade: Thank you. It's very humbling. 15. Valley Regional Transit: 30 Pine Route and Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Request Simison: All right. Next item up is Item 15, which is the Valley Regional Transit 30 Pine Route and fiscal year 2023 budget request. Caleb, Miranda, are you going to say anything or just turn this over to Stephen? Hood: Mr. Mayor, we are ready for Mr. Hunt, unless you have any remarks you want from staff first. Simison: No. Just thought I would check. Okay. Stephen. Hunt: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. Stephen Hunt, development director of Valley Regional Transit. Glad to be here today. I prepared a presentation for you about the FY 23 funding request from the City of Meridian. So, first of all, I just wanted Page 67 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page ——— to make sure you are all aware of the services that are provided by VRT within the City of Meridian and I will be speaking to the --the memo that was included in your packet. There are three fixed route services that would be identified serving Meridian for fiscal year 2023. Those include the inner county services of the Route 40, which connect Nampa to Boise. Route 42, which also connect Nampa -- Nampa and Boise through Meridian and, then, Route 30, which essentially covers the core Meridian from the east side to the west side, starting at Ten Mile crossing and going over to The Village. In addition to those fixed route services VRT works -- has been working with the City of Meridian on providing several specialized services. Those include support for Harvest Transit, the Meridian veterans shuttle, as well as the Rides2Wellness, which is a program that covers Ada county, including -- including the City of Meridian. So, between all those services we provide a -- a number of transportation options to the residents in Meridian and the FY- 23 request would be to continue support of those, in addition to any of the other planning support for -- for services, the customer service support, IT, all -- and of the associated programs. I wanted to also spend just a minute talking about what's going on with ridership over the last month. Sorry. Last few months. As you know, COVID has been a really big impact on transit ridership for the last two years, but in -- since -- since February of 2021 we have seen ridership bottom out and start to come back and so when we are comparing now first quarter of FY-22 and quarter two of FY-22 to FY-21 , we are seeing ridership growth system wide. That's up about 18 and a half percent. We are seeing some -- some really significant percent increases in the specialized transportation as well and that is a lot of -- of the -- due to the fact that during COVID we saw many of those programs closed down or -- or significantly reduce their levels of service and so we are seeing that come back, which is exciting. One more on that slide. We know that comparing it just to FY-21 is -- isn't the whole picture, so we wanted to look at the last several years. So, although ridership has -- we feel like hit the bottom and is starting to trend up, we are about 75 percent of where we were say in April of 2019, which was pre- COVID numbers. So, we are encouraged by the -- by the growth. We still have some ways to go. So, as it relates -- oh. Excuse me. One of the other things that I forgot to mention back here -- you know, we have been planning for the launch of the Route 30 for -- for a number of years. We have been working with staff the schedule of that launch date and we are proposing to launch that at the beginning of FY-23. So, we had delayed it initially because of COVID, then, delayed it one more time because of delta variant. We thought there might be an opportunity to start that in this fiscal year. We are seeing, both in terms of the amount of COVID that's being spread around, as well as just people coming back to work and those are all trending in the right direction, the ridership is trending in the right direction. We want to have services for when developments such as the apartments across the street here come online, we want to have service available for both residents and employers when -- when those open up. So we are targeting October of 2023 to be the start of the Route 30. So, speaking about the FY-23 -- the specific FY- 23 funding request, just wanted to reiterate we -- we apply a cost allocation model to our full budget. We begin by identifying all of the -- all of the expenses for the year, by identifying the non-local revenues and apply those revenues to the -- to the budget and, then, we categorize those costs into general assessment -- general assessments into capital and service assessments and any other specialized services, such as the Harvest Transit or -- or Rides2Wellness and we distribute the remaining local -- local cost among Page 68 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page 13 of 26 our funding partners and that's what this -- that's what this graph shows here is total budget, any non-local revenues, the remaining local contributions that will be distributed and, then, what Meridian's share of that remaining local contribution is. Last year when we came and we talked about our funding request, we --we tried to keep the City Council appraised of all of the different changes that happen as we move from this stage of our initial budget, roll out to the final completion and --and the cooperative agreement. Based on feedback we received last year we are starting with what is the -- the worst case scenario for the -- our request to the City of Meridian. We will continue to refine our budget over the next several months. Any changes to that would be documented in the cooperative agreement, but as a funding request our request to the City of Meridian would be the 884. A couple of things that we are still working on is we are still working on finalizing all the -- the -- applying all of the non-local revenues to the -- to the current year. We also at the end of this fiscal year would have potentially other revenues to -- from FY- 22 that we would apply and all of that gets captured in the cooperative agreement, which we would -- which we would execute at the beginning of FY-23. But to note there --when we compare FY-22 baseline -- again, this is--this was the baseline, not what the executed amount was, because we had originally intended to be running the Route 30 in FY-22, we pulled that off as our budget and -- and the planning continued in FY-22, but to compare as much as we could apples to apples, our FY-22 baseline request, which would be providing the same levels of service as we were talking about in FY-23, this is how those two break out. We are continuing to see some cost increases that are largely due to -- to increased labor, there is health insurance costs that continue to go up, as we convert to battery electric, the procurement of our -- our electric vehicles. We included a battery lease in there, which is new this year. So, we are starting to see some of those cost increases, the -- the cost benefits that we see with going to electric, such as lower preventative maintenance, those we will see in the future, but we don't see them in the moment. So, those are the cost drivers. We also included this year, which was not included last year, is a reserve assessment and, again, that's all outlined in the memo in front of you and I am just here to answer any questions you may have on the information presented. Simison: Thank you, Stephen. Council, questions? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Hi„ Stephen. Hunt: Hello. Strader: I apologize, I'm going to be asking detailed questions. Hunt: That is okay. Page 69 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page 14 of 26 Strader: If you could go back to the slide that has the different sort of special senior center Rides2Wellness, that list. I just wanted to understand the mechanism through which you guys kind of outsource those services. So, the senior center specifically, my understanding is that for every ride you guys provide the senior center with a payment and that payment is meant to reimburse them for gas, drivers, repairs of their vehicles, et cetera. I just wanted to just double check -- and if you want to just follow up via an e-mail or something that's fine, too, if you don't have it in front of you, but what those payments represent and, then, you know, I know they have capital needs. The vehicle they are using is not going to work going forward. It's like over 20 years old. It's been breaking down. Do you guys help provide the capital costs to a provider, like the senior center, when you're kind of outsourcing the provision of transportation services to them? So, just maybe some follow up on -- on those details and mechanics and -- and what they are meant to reimburse exactly. Hunt: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Strader, yeah, we can certainly follow up with more information about that, but it is my understanding that our -- our request for the senior center in particular is a budget that we, then, build to on -- on a per ride basis, which is different say than how we -- how we are talking about costs for -- for fixed route service. And, then, to your second question about capital needs, I think it depends a little bit on the -- on the relationship we have with the provider, but we -- we certainly help our partners with capital expenses. So, if there is a capital need we work with them to identify what that need is and put that into -- into our -- into our budget. Strader: Mr. Mayor. Thank you. That's really helpful. I think maybe the Director Crystal Campbell of our CDBG group will possibly reach out to you regarding some details there as well. I just want to make sure if -- if they have a capital need and you have an agreement that they are reaching out to you as well for help if their vehicle doesn't work anymore, so --just so we cover all of our bases. Hunt: Mr. Mayor, I have a clarifying question. Simison: Mr. Hunt. Hunt: So, Council Woman Strader, you are saying that you are getting request on your capital block group grant for funds to the senior -- Meridian Senior Center? Strader: Yes, that's correct. Badesheim: So, Mr. Mayor, Council Member, we actually have in our budget at least one and -- and possibly two vehicles for the -- for the Meridian Senior Center. I think what they are looking for is local match, because we have to have a 20 percent match for that vehicle. So, it may be -- and this is something we can follow up, but we do have that in our budget for -- I know at least one vehicle for them and I think they were also wanting to add another one maybe for next year. Page 70 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page —of 26 Strader: Thank you. I -- I didn't want to take us completely down a rabbit hole, which I am notorious for. We will definitely follow up with you to make sure we -- we are covering all the details. Thanks. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Stephen, it's a small amount, but I was just curious if you would explain the -- the reserve assessment that's being implemented. I mean it's only showing 8,900 dollars. What -- what's that going to be used for? You know, looking in the memo it talks about, hey, this was -- it was not introduced until this current cycle, but that was it and I'm assuming that reserve assessment will be a percentage and it's going to be equal for -- for all entities, so if you could explain that in a little bit further detail. Hunt: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Hoaglun, that's -- that's correct. So, we have been working with the VRT board to establish a policy that where -- where VRT could have a cash reserve to -- on hand such that if there are any incidents that--where we might need cash we have a place to go to that isn't -- wouldn't require us to come immediately to any of our funding partners and request that in a moment and so that's the general purpose of it and it is set -- there is a -- the board -- working through the board we have set what that total target is for our reserve amount and, then, using the cost allocation model we distributed those --that amount among all of our funding partners and I --and, then, what's presented here I believe is a ten year -- is a ten year time frame to get up to the reserve amount that we are looking for and we included that in our funding request of each of our funding partners. Clearly that's to start the discussion. But, yes, it is distributed according to the -- the cost allocation. Bernt: Mr. Mayor, follow up? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: Same -- same line of question. If--with this 8,900 dollars let's say during the next fiscal year those funds aren't used are they reallocated back to the cities or do you keep them? Hunt: That is a good question, Mr. Mayor, Councilman Bernt. The -- I believe they would remain with Valley Regional Transit in an unallocated fund. I don't know the exact terms of how those would be managed, but the intent would be that there would be a cash reserve that -- that would be on hand for the Valley Regional Transit to use in cases of emergency and with the intent of growing that amount over -- over the ten year period I have to assume that, yeah, those would remain with VRT. Badesheim: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Bernt, the -- the target is about 3.9 million for us to have and that was based on three months worth of -- I think it's three months worth of operating -- local revenue or for -- for operating. So, what we -- the board approved a Page 71 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page ——— policy that we would negotiate that with each jurisdiction with their cooperative agreements each year. So, this is the amount that would be allocated for this year. If we get to the end of 2022 and it looks like there was some savings, we would, then, credit that back. So, the cash reserve amount we might request the next year might be zero or it might be lower based on -- so, we have an annual target and as long as we are hitting that annual target then -- and, then, it--over that ten year period and it is to collect enough so that we have that reserve available. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I completely understand the intent of what you are trying to accomplish. I don't know if I'm a huge fan of, you know, of -- of -- of having, you know, taxpayer money in an account and knowing that it may or may not be used. I just think that that's -- sometimes that gets a little bit murky and it can be just a hair confusing. So, maybe something we can talk about in the future. Not sure I'm a huge fan of that. But another question that I had -- so, just to be clear -- and I have been asked this question a couple of times, so we originally came out with the budget for this new route in 2021 . Because of COVID it wasn't implemented. Again in 2022. Talk to me and provide some clarity with regard to what the difference is from the funds that have been paid to you that haven't been used because the route hasn't taken effect and won't take effect until October of this year versus how much you are asking for in this budget that will cover this route again. Hunt: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Councilman Bernt. We have been working with all of our jurisdiction partners, City of Meridian in particular, to identify the money -- the monies that we need to operate the services that are provided. In the case of the Route 30, we -- like as shown on here on this FY-22 baseline request, we had originally included that. By the time we made it to our cooperative agreement in September we knew that we would not be operating the -- the Route 30 for the full amount of time. We adjusted the amount that we were requesting and, in fact, as per the invoice we -- we have reduced that further, knowing that there could be an amount that we would come back and ask for should we start the Route 30 in FY-22. So, the short answer is we never -- we never invoiced the City of Meridian for any Route 30 service. Bernt: Okay. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: I think the best way just to add -- this is the clean dollar figure. There is not a credit that's over at VRT that's waiting or otherwise? I try to make sure we shored up -- what is the real cost without these last two years of back and forth. Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Thank you. So, similar, but unrelated question regarding Route 30 or any route, really, that VRT is running where, you know, you have the -- the ridership numbers. Page 72 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page 17—— Obviously readership wasn't there with COVID, but aside from COVID help me understand the decision to keep a route going or not going. Is it based on ridership? Is it based on funding? Is it -- can you help me understand -- you know, I do see these -- and if you want to go back to the slide with those numbers -- I do see those numbers, they -- they don't look like significant amount of ridership to me, but I don't know how that compares to other routes or what the expectation is from VRT for Route 30. Help -- help explain a little bit more why you are wanting to start it up now in -- in regard to the numbers that you have. Connect those dots for me if you would, please. Hunt: Yes. The -- we work with each jurisdiction partner to identify transportation needs and, then, work to secure funding to provide those -- provide those services. Whether or not that service continues is dependent on both -- essentially on the -- the funding partner's willingness to contribute -- or to continue that contribution given the -- the result that they are getting. So, we have these conversations each year with our funding partners. Is -- is the ridership that we are getting back for that investment worth it? Ultimately that comes down to a value judgment of each of our funding partners. But more to the point about when -- why are we thinking that the Route 30 might be good to launch now -- is we are looking -- when we are -- when we launch a new service we want it to be -- we want it to be successful. We want the environment to be ripe and with the development that's going on at the Ten Mile Crossing, which is -- when we originally developed the -- the Route 30 the idea was we were trying to connect the job centers of the Ten Mile Crossing, downtown Meridian and out of The Village. Those three entities have continued to grow and develop since we originally planned the route. We want it to be -- one of the triggers is the residential development that's coming. Actually, not just in downtown Meridian, but including downtown Meridian, but also along Pine. The -- the -- there is significant development off of State -- State there that's within walking distance of the new service. So, there are new -- new development that's coming online that we -- that we want to have the service in place as people are moving in establishing the transportation habits that they have that as an option. It also provides an opportunity for us to work with each of those developers to establish maybe past programs, which is something that we are -- are starting to do, so that that could be a benefit to the residents of those facilities and/or on the employer side -- employer pass programs, which is something we have done for many years to help encourage different types of travel behavior. So, that's kind of the --the meta environment we are talking about. Specifically, though, we are seeing people return to more regular activity, although it's still not the same as it was pre-COVID, but we also recognize that it -- it may not be exactly like it was in 2019 for many years. So, what we are looking at is are the -- are the specific impacts of COVID -- COVID's impact on people's travel behavior changing, enlightening, and we feel that that is the case and is the development in the -- in the corridor will continue to grow in a way that we want transit to be able to take advantage of that and so those are some of the factors that we are looking at specifically for Route 30. There were some ridership projections that were included in the memo and those are -- are there to give a sense of what we hope to see once it's implemented. All routes take a little bit of time to mature. People need to learn about it and adjust their schedules accordingly and the -- the target that at the end of that I think is at about eight or ten boardings per hour, Page 73 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page ——— which is roughly where our system wide average is and so we would look at that as -- as being successful. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. I mean I thought one of the comments you also made in your memo that at least I found compelling was that with inflation and particularly the cost of gas going up so much that is something else that might be a positive factor for ridership. So, I'm sort of hoping that that will outweigh the lingering effects of the pandemic. But thought the memo is great. Thank you. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Stephen, nice to see virtually. Sorry I'm not in the room. Thank you. Thank you, Kelli. Please pass on my appreciation to the VRT board for getting this conversation to us before we go into -- into budget hearings. I think this is good dialogue from amongst the Council and I appreciate your guys' proactive efforts to get this to us earlier rather than later. Maybe a comment first and, then, a question, because I think Council Member Bernt brought up a really good question, which is about the reserves and I think he shares the same concern that at least that I shared when I was on the VRT board about using taxpayer dollars to help build a reserve for another agency and I think just for the benefit of the Council, my level of comfort and supporting this is because it is a slow build up. I think it also has VRT being really thoughtful about how they are spending their dollars and trying to find some efficiencies to reserve extra revenue and at the end of the day if -- if something happens we still would need VRT to be able to operate in some capacity and making sure they have got that revenue to do that. To -- to me I'm -- I'm comfortable with the request for the reserve as is, recognizing that that's going to come back to us on an -- on an annual basis and future Councils will still be able to make that decision about if it makes sense for them or not. Stephen, my -- my question for you is just about when -- when Pine 30 was initially conceived there was a lot of excitement about, hey, we are going to get these new electric buses and the city participated in that and the infrastructure to charge them and you touched on earlier and it's in the memo about the batteries. So, my -- my question is we are finally getting close now to being able to launch Pine 30 and I know these buses are still relatively new, but we are now kind of inheriting a depreciated asset to some degree and so I'm curious about what's the thought from the VRT board or administration about when the cities will be asked to provide additional funding for replacement, repairs, and how that's all contemplated in the funding request. Hunt: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Cavener, that's a great question regarding capital and something that we are building into our -- our cost allocation model is sharing those costs among all of our funding partners. So, when the Route 30 was developed we worked with the City of Meridian to -- so, this is one area that we did invoice and we received the Page 74 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page ——— money and spend it on -- on those vehicles as -- as planned. If we are launching new service we -- we work with our funding partners to ensure that we have the sufficient rolling stock, the capital, and if it -- if it like puts us above where we were and we need a new service to do that service, we -- we work with the entities that are kind of pushing us in that direction. That's the way we have done it in the past to get that additional vehicle; right? We --we are relatively new at putting the capital cost into the cost allocation model. Being able to do that over -- with the -- a longer time frame will allow us to share those costs more equitably with our funding partners, but you will see capital costs come to our funding partners according to the cost allocation model based on where service is being provided and what that -- what the cost of that capital is. I hope that answered your question a little bit. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, maybe a follow-up. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Thanks. So, Stephen, I guess kind of to that point, City of Meridian purchased the buses, helped fund part of the charging infrastructure. That stock -- by the time Pine 30 begins that stock will have been on the road for a little over a year and so I guess, one, what's the lifespan on one of those and what is VRT's approach to making sure that what the City Council appropriated for we receive over the -- over the timeline of that capital being in use? Hunt: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Cavener, you are asking about the depreciated value of that particular asset and how do we make sure that the City of Meridian gets credit for for that. So -- and you asked a couple of questions in there. One is how long do the buses usually last and they are 12 to 15 years. Is the -- is the useful life benchmark of those vehicles. How long they actually last can depend a lot based on -- on how the -- the bus operates. But we don't currently have a mechanism kind of thought through in terms of capturing a depreciated amount. There is arguments I suppose on -- I guess we don't -- we don't have that. I could tell you more about how we have done capital in the past, but -- that's a good question, Council Member Cavener. Cavener: And Stephen -- Mr. Mayor. Sorry. If I may ask -- Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: And, Stephen, that's not necessarily something that I think that I need an answer on today, but I guess I think that is something that I would hope staff and the -- and the board is exploring and I would hope would likely be included as part of a future presentation to us. Hunt: Certainly. Cavener: Thank you. Page 75 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page 20 of 26 Simison: Maybe a follow up. Just -- has that bus been operating somewhere somehow during this time? It has not been operating is what we are -- I'm getting as a, no, it has not been operating. If that helps or doesn't help. I mean -- Badesheim: So, we purchased -- Mr. Mayor, we purchased -- we had a -- a contract for up to 12 vehicles and four of them we have taken delivery of and we are operating. The others partly because of the pandemic got delayed. So, some of those have just been arriving in the last six months or so. They are -- there is still some charging equipment that's being installed. So, a lot of this is still on guarantee and warranty and so the vehicles that we have in our possession have not all fully gone out to service yet, which is not unusual when you are starting a brand new technology and -- and bringing on that many vehicles. So, the -- the vehicles that we will -- and I believe will be using the 35 foot vehicles, which are the ones that we are taking delivery of and have been for the last few months, so as far as I know they -- the vehicles that will be operated in Meridian haven't actually officially put in service yet. Simison: Maybe that helps answer that immediately, but maybe long term there would still be additional Information Councilman Cavener may want to hear from, so -- Hunt: Yeah. Mr. Mayor, I would add that it's true we pool all those capital resources together, so it's not like there is a Meridian bus that is the only Meridian bus and when it's expired we are going to come back and ask for another, you know, whatever to replace that Meridian bus. It's -- it becomes a shared resource. So, there will be new vehicles out here. Simison: Council, any additional questions? Okay. Thank you for this information. This number is in your budget book that you will be receiving for your consideration through the budget process. Hunt: Thank you. 16. Public Works: Two Percent (2%) Water and Sewer Utility Rate Increase Discussion Simison: Thank you. Next item on the agenda is Item 16, Public Works two percent water and sewer utility rate increase discussion. Turn this over to Laurelei. McVey: Thank you. All right. Good afternoon, Mayor and Council. Today I'm coming before you to give you some details related to our need for an adjustment to our water and sewer utility rates. So, I think before we start the conversation it's really important to note that we have not increased water-sewer rates since 2014 and today I will cover the various reasons that have driven the need for that increase. Meridian is in a really unique and enviable position of having no debt. This is in part due to our careful long-term financial planning of mayors, departments, and councils of both past and present. We all subscribe to the save before you spend philosophy and as such our rates have to be sufficient to cover those ongoing expenses, as well as funding our large capital projects. Page 76 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page— —— So, we are proposing a two percent increase on the water and sewer base and usage rates. So, you will see there is other components of the utility bill that won't be impacted by this, but that two percent increase will result in about an estimated dollar 22 cent per month increase for our average customer in Meridian. So, a little bit of background on the city's Enterprise Fund. So, this is the fund that supports water and waste -- the water and wastewater utilities and has several revenue sources. So, the majority of the annual revenue comes from our water and sewer rates. You will see about a third of our revenue comes in the form of assessments. Those are also sometimes called hookup fees, which are paid when new development connects to the system and that's the buy in to their share of the systems capacity and replacement value. Expenses in the Enterprise Fund come in two primary forms. The first is funding our ongoing personnel, operating, and maintenance expenses and the second is funding our -- in the Enterprise Fund usually large one time capital projects that are needed to increase system capacity, improve customer service and/or meet state and federal regulation -- regulations and requirements. So, this is a -- our financial model of the Enterprise Fund. So, in order to maintain the stability of the Enterprise Fund and of utility rates we plan on a ten year horizon. So, we have a detailed financial model that looks at operating expenses, capital projects, and revenue based on projected growth rates and use rates to show us what we think our fund is anticipated to do over the ten year horizon. So, you will see our fund balance is dropping below the solvency point in or around 2028 and this is really due to a significant increase that we are seeing in the capital -- capital construction side. We have had to add close to 47 million dollars in additional expenses to our planned project portfolio. These costs are primarily for existing projects, not adding new projects. In the current market we are seeing bids come in between 20 and 50 percent higher than our engineer's estimates regularly. We are also seeing some increases on our operational side as related to chemical costs and electricity rates, just to name a few. However, they have a smaller impact on the fund balance than those large capital projects. So, a couple of things to note. As I already mentioned, we have not increased the water-sewer utility rates since 2014. In 2014 we implemented a ten year EPAfee to cover expensive capital cost based on new federal and state requirements that were put in place at our wastewater utility. That fee is set to sunset in 2024. That fee has been really successful in allowing us to collect the necessary revenue over the ten years to complete the required wastewater projects and remain debt free. You will also see the last time that we updated our assessment or hookup fees was in 2017. It should be noted that we are in the process of completing a cost of service study that will help us determine where those assessment fees should be set and we anticipate bringing back an increase in those fees later this summer. So, you will see this is our proposal that models increasing the rates by two percent and increasing the assessment fee by our estimates. So, it improves our solvency picture. You may wonder or want to know why our solve -- our picture still drops below in 2031 and why we are not asking for a larger increase today. We look at this financial model every year and it changes based on actual project costs, amount spent, revenues collected and so we -- this is the increase that we would propose this year, an update to the assessment fees, and, then, reevaluate again next year and -- and bring forward the picture again at next fiscal year. So, where we compare to others -- Meridian continues to have water and sewer rates that even with the two percent increase fall almost ten dollars per month below the valley wide average and over 25 dollars per month Page 77 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page 22—— less than some of our neighboring cities. However, I did want to take a minute to talk about some of the low income assistance programs that are available to our customers for their utility bills. One of those is the Meridian CARES program. This program is funded by the city and administered by El Ada and customers who meet financial eligibility requirements can receive up to one hundred dollars per year to help pay for their water, sewer, and trash bills. There are additional community sponsored programs that are not part of the city that are also available. The Boise School District puts out a really good resource guide that outlines how you can get assistance with utility bills, among other types of assistance resources. So, our schedule for moving forward. We are publishing a notice of this proposed increase in the next two utility bills. We are also publishing it in the newspaper and we plan to hold a public hearing at the June 14th 6:00 p.m. regular Council meeting. If all of that moves forward and Council approves the two percent rate increase -- increase, we would look to implement that increase on June 15th. And just a couple of notes. Public Works is really proud of providing the critical and highly regulated services that we do to the Meridian community. Our services are essential. We don't ask for this rate increase lightly. However, the rising cost of doing business and funding our critical projects have driven the need for the adjustment. We really strive to keep our rates stable and affordable, while still providing premier water and wastewater services to the City of Meridian community and with that I'm happy to answer any questions that you might have about the proposed increase. Simison: Thank you, Laurelei. Council, questions? Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: Not really a question, but more of a comment. You know, first off, I think that this is important. I -- I think that you are right that in the past it's -- you know, past council, past mayor, past directors and staff who have put Meridian in a -- in a position where we are -- you know, where we have what we have and without any debt. It's -- it's been the Meridian way for generations and, hopefully, we can keep it that way for as long as we can. So, I applaud you and those who came before you for a job --job well done. I think -- on top of that I think it's really important that we let our residents know and I'm sure the Mayor's office will reach out to the community and let them know that this is happening and so that if there are folks who are -- who have concerns or questions that they can frequent the -- the public meeting that we will have next month. So, thank you so much. Simison: And as was mentioned, this is going out in everyone's utility bills and will also be going out on NextDoor and social media. Bernt: Good. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Page 78 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page——— Strader: Thanks, Laurelei. Great presentation. You know, on the one hand I feel like eight years without an increase, that's fantastic execution of our fiscal philosophy. On the other hand, part of me thinks, wow, eight years without an increase, that kind of scares me, if I'm being honest. If we had more regular increases going forward over time what does that curve look like? McVey: Mayor, Council Woman Strader, so it -- it would bring that insolvency point up. However, we try really hard to balance the need of collecting what we actually need and we have projected projects for and not over collecting for unknowns. So, we have -- we have tried to balance that and just collect for what we have needed. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. Absolutely. That makes a lot of sense. I -- you know, the one thing that gives me pause a little bit is just the mix in terms of our reliance on assessments compared to having a base that's completely supported by the existing residents, because as we build out, right, like 20 years down the line, as the whole city is filled out, I think we just want to reach an end state where the base of residents supports the utility and not reliance on new construction. I mean that happens. I guess if you could comment on that. Is that off base or is that something we should be thinking about? McVey: Sure. Council Woman Strader, that's a great point. One of the things that will kind of offset, though, as assessments decrease our need to build additional infrastructure will also decrease and so you will see that kind of leveling where we will have less of the expensive capital projects and more just reliance on steady state operations if the city is not continuing to grow. Strader: Mr. Mayor, one more. Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: One thing I would love is as we do these projects that we are considering with ARPA funding, the things that, you know, save us on operating costs going forward, like, you know, using our bio gas to generate electricity, for example, things like that. It would be great if we could keep track of those, you know, money saving projects that we are doing. I just think it's really great to show, you know, the resourcefulness of your department in terms of digging deep to save on operating costs as much as possible, because I feel like that is a part of the story. Thank you. Simison: And if I could just add in here, you know, I -- I have shared -- expressed some of the same concerns from Council Woman Strader, that not taking an increase in eight years. I think when you are having a growing staff, growing issues, there probably should have been. I think that's what -- by doing the rate study is helping us chew up where we should be taking more ongoing costs compared to the practice that we have had where Page 79 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page 24 of 26 we have commingled the costs and this -- that will help us get to that point and we can continue to do that. But I do think the taking -- it's our hope that this -- where we are at is not -- the -- the increases that we are seeing this year compared to last year are not the future of increases moving forward. So, prudence and setting what we know we think we need, but being prepared for additional adjustments to what the market finally levels out at at that number, whatever that may be in the coming years. So, we understand this is step one of potential many, but what we think we truly need access to to move forward right now. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Yeah. I -- I -- I don't doubt the need to do this and so the if part is -- is an answer to me that, yes, we have to do it. It's -- it's -- it's necessary. We want to keep our -- our system operating and -- and being able to handle the growth, so if we increase assessments that helps on that end. The only -- the only question I keep mulling through and it would be interesting to get feedback from the public when you hold the public hearings is how we do that, because do we increase it two percent for 2023 in the coming fiscal year, but, then, in 2024 the EPA fee sunsets, which is a three -- three and a half, three and three quarter percent and all of a sudden our rates go down and, then, it's back to increasing again. So, do we hold off a year and, then, take that -- take that EPA fee, absorb that, because they are already paying it, continue that and -- and I want to make sure people understand that reason why and, then, implement a series of what changes need to be made moving forward. So, it's just a matter of how it's done is kind of -- I'm not settled in my mind yet, but your -- your comment on that I would -- I would certainly welcome. McVey: So -- Councilman Hoaglun, so we did run that analysis. So, the EPA fee is set to sunset in 2024 is $3.75. If we did nothing and waited until 2024 and replaced that EPA fee, it would be approximately a 6.6 percent rate increase at that time. Simison: Council, any additional questions at this time? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Thanks, Mr. Mayor. Laurelei, I appreciate the presentation. Appreciate your work and kind of sharing kind of where things are headed with the Council. Similar to Council Member Hoaglun's question, I guess maybe that may just be a suggestion, is I think it's important that we share what staff is recommending, but perhaps also provide the public for feedback on some of the other proposals. I know that you guys as -- as a department have contemplated. I -- I kind am somewhere where Council Member Hoaglun was is just letting the EPA sunset -- EPA sunset and have that replaced with -- with the -- with the increase. But, obviously, want to hear back from -- from the public Page 80 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page—of 26 sand, then, perhaps a suggestion. Laurelei, it sounds like that you and your team are reviewing rates and kind of where things need to be on an annual basis and I think you have heard good feedback from the Mayor and some of the Council Members about maybe eight years was too long and -- and I think having you come back to us on an annual basis, even if the recommendation is we don't anticipate needing to change the rates this year, I think that's beneficial for the Council for us to hear that on a -- on a -- on a -- I guess a reoccurring basis. Sometimes perhaps maybe before our budget hearing, so that we are all on the same page and we can contemplate that when we go into our budget hearings. And, then, just my -- my only question was about on Meridian CARES and I don't expect you to know this off the top of your head, but bonus points if you do. Do we know about on average how much we spend through that program for people who are in need? McVey: So, Councilman Cavener, I believe -- and this is a rough estimate, but I believe last year was about 13,000 -- in the ballpark 13,000 dollars. Simison: Great. Thank you, Laurelei. I appreciate that update. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: I just wanted to say that I appreciate Councilman Cavener's comments and I agree with him that a yearly review would be great, specifically because the estimated 46 million increase in costs are -- there is several of those projects that are three plus years long and so we don't know if we are going to -- it's going to be 55 million next year when -- you know, as all of this plays out and so at least specifically during this time when construction costs, chemical costs are so volatile, the annual review I think is really necessary, so -- Simison: And maybe just add to that, I think based on the -- the way we are approaching this an annual review will be necessary, you know, unless there is a dramatic change in -- in the industry you will need to come back every year. McVey: The other thing that can change our Enterprise Fund budget dramatically is changing regulations. So, that would be the other thing that could come in that we would have to, you know, do different projects or bring forward planned projects, which could change that picture as well. Simison: Thank you, Laurelei. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I move that we adjourn our work session. Page 81 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. May 24,2022 Page——— Bernt: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and we are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:47 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON Approved 6-7 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK Page 82 7/tem 77 E IDIAN'-'---- JAMu AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the May 10, 2022 City Council Work Session Page 3 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. May 10,2022 Page——— Idaho State Tax Commission as required by law; and providing for a summary of the ordinance; and providing for a waiver of the reading rules; and providing an effective date. Simison: Thank you. Council, you have heard this ordinance read by title. Is there anybody that would like it read in its entirety? Seeing none, Clerk will call the roll. I'm sorry. Is there a motion? Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: I move that we approve Ordinance No. 22-1978 with a suspension of rules. Strader: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 20, Ordinance No. 22-1978 under suspension of the rules. Is there any discussion? If not, Clerk will call the roll. Roll call: Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Bernt, yea; Perreault, yea; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I move we adjourn. Simison: Motion to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6.20 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON ATTEST: Approved 5-24-2022 CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK Page 39 Item#2. E IDIAN'-'---- JAMu AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Tetherow Crossing Water Main Easement LLI ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2022-050281 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 05/26/2022 09:46 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2022-0162 Tetherow Crossing Subdivision Water Main Easement No. 1 WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made this 24th day of May , 2022 between H H IF V LLC ("Grantor"), and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of- way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property: The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 public streek, then, to such exterrt, such right-of_way and easement hereby granted which lies within s ch bo ndary thereof or which is a part thereof shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be c mplctely r¢liny uished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Gnmtee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the a{rementioned and described tract of land, and Orat Grantor has a good and lawful right to c ey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever deII"end the title and quiet possession thereof agaivst the lawfitl claims of all persons whomsoav¢r_ THE COVENANTS OF GAAN'1'OR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal represenlativ¢s, purchasers, or transferees ofany k-ind- IIQ WITNESS WHEREOF, [he said parties of the first paz( Gave hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first hereinabove written_ G12ANTOR: HHIF V LLC STATE OF lDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged loefore me on �I L3 � (7� <date) by + _ (name of individual), Cc rnplete (he-following 1�Sn,Ytg i -Presentative capacity, or sirltre the j llowls,g if signtng in an tndtvidual c pacity] [behalf of (name of entity behalf of whom record oouted), the~{ollowing -epresenta[ive capacity: _-_ (type of aur-horny such as oftioer or tmstee) stamp .. � C .l �C.U'�1'��S _9��E�.N...-f.;'i��..f�'�-_ Notar atm `T 1 G"L. 5 S NOTARY � _ My Commissioin lE:xpires:�� ��PUBt-��,SS� �i �` 041�k Z��� �i��JJ� i. -'9?'E oe ��- Water Main Easement Versien O1/Ol/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 5-24-2022 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 5-24-2022 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 5-2 4-2 0 2 2 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 Page 43 Water Main Easement Version 01/01/202 EXHIBIT A Legal Description City of Meridian Water Easement Tetherow Crossing Subdivision An easement being located in the SW% of the SW'/4 of Section 36, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a Brass Cap monument marking the southwest corner of said Section 36, from which a Brass Cap monument marking the southeast corner of the SW%of said Section 36 bears S 88043'02" E a distance of 2662.34 feet; Thence along the southerly boundary of said SW Y4 S 88043'02" E a distance of 665.63 feet to a point; Thence leaving said southerly boundary N 0°17'23" E a distance of 159.52 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing N 0°17'23" E a distance of 25.00 feet to a point; Thence S 88°43'02" E a distance of 116.04 feet to a point on a curve; Thence a distance of 25.95 feet along the arc of a 70.00 foot radius non-tangent curve left, said curve having a central angle of 21014'24" and a long chord bearing S 49052'44" E a distance of 25.80 feet to a point; Thence S 29'12'28" W a distance of 9.98 feet to a point; Thence N 88043'02" W a distance of 131.03 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This easement contains 3,194 square feet (0.073 acres) more or less and is subject to any other easements existing or in use. Clinton W. Hansen, PLS Land Solutions, PC April 12, 2022 ONNL LA/VO 5� STF 0 ill18 Ox OF SOP Cb 'LT0 N W N P� City of Meridian Water Easement ��= Land Surveying and Consul[fng Tetherow Crossing Subdivision Job No.20-4 Page 44 E-1 EXHIBIT B CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER EASEMENT TETHEROW CROSSING SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 36, TAN., RAW., B.M. CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNY, IDAHO 1/4 U 356136 I i cn M � 3 ___S88'43_02_E116.04_ — co o r—N J194 SF/0.073 ACRES \�� �� W. SANTIAGO ST. T __�____.T_______r_____� N ICD POINT OF N88'43'02"W 131.03' .� LLJ BEGINNING 0 ZC4Ln PRpcRo SING Spgp. i ��ERpw o w r) N n W � Z Z Z 35 36 _ 665.63' 36 — 1996.71' 2 1 W. USTICK RD. S88'43'02"E 2662.34' 1/4 BASIS OF BEARING 1 C)Np.L LA/y0 S Aq 1ST0' 30' 60' 120' 0 111 8 o ON W NP CURVE TABLET11 Land "'z' I tA "! �' <. F CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA BEARING CHORD Land Surveying and Consulting C1 25.95' 70.00' 21*14'24" S49'52'44"E 25.80' M EERIDIA sr.8 6 A MAN,ID 83642 (208)288-2040 (208)288-2557 fax www.landsolutions.biz d0L n Page 45 Item#3. E IDIAN'-'---- JAMu AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: The Reserve Subdivision North Pedestrian Pathway Easement Page 46 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2022-049802 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 05/25/2022 08:06 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE S T®2 22-0176 The Reserve Subdivision North PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this 24th day of 20 2; between The eserve A hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", and the"City of Meridian,-an Idaho municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as"Grantee"; WITNESSET WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian desires to establish a public pathway; and WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to grant an easement to establish a public pathway and provide connectivity to present and future portions of the pathway;and WHEREAS, Grantor shall construct the pathway improvements upon the easement described herein-and NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: THE GRANTOR does hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following property, described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit " attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing a public pedestrian pathway easement for multiple-use non-motorized recreation, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD,'said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees that it will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto,that the Grantor shall repair and maintain the pathway improvements. THE GRANTOR`hereby covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should' any part of the easement hereby granted become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV 01/01/2020 Page t then, to such extent such easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that it will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hereinabove written. GRANTOR: The Reserve HOA '(tAOF IDAH ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 3 (date) by7acl�wl 4"a (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity) on behalf of W A mile �/g (name of entiLy on b half of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity 0i4 i re3 ( GT F (type of authority such as officer or trustee) ;•�41 Q y p� �ip• No y Sig `ure MY y CommissioCOMMISSION KxPIUs '0 • . n 1/28/Z027 %c � a •••.`SSION ND 20•i 6609 004899 Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 01/01/2020 Page 48 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 5-24-2022 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 5-24-2022 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 5-24-2022 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 01/01/2020 Page 49 DocuSign Envelope ID:AE114CB9-8A6E-4C46-8D1E-FC554E456F60 601 Sherman Ave,Suite 1 KELLER Coeur d'Alene,ID 83E74 A S S O C I A T E S ' (208)75e-8601 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION of SIDEWALK EASEMENT RESERVE OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC. TO CITY OF MERIDIAN That portion of Lot 2, Block 1 of The Reserve Subdivision,according to plat thereof, filed in Book 97 of Plats at pages 12153-12156, as Instrument No. 106197564, records of Ada County, Idaho being situated in the NE 1/4 of Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Idaho, described as follows: Commencing at the east 1/4 corner said Section 30, from which the northeast corner of said Section bears North 00°37'33"East,2,656.62 feet; thence along the east line of said Section North 00°37'33"East 1,328.23 feet; thence leaving said east line North 89°49'32" West, 35.00 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of said Lot 2, Block 1; thence continuing along the north line of said Lot 2, Block 1 to North 89°49'32"West, 5.00 feet, more or less to the west line of an existing 15 foot Ada County Highway District sidewalk easement, recorded September 21, 2006 as Instrument No. 106151260, records of Ada County, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING: thence continuing along the west line of said sidewalk easement, South 00°37'33"West, 108.55 feet; thence leaving said sidewalk easement 1.37 feet along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the left having a radius of 18.52 feet and a central angle of 04°13'41"; said curve having a long chord which bears North 07°04'57"West, a chord distance of 1.37 feet; thence North 09°50'53" West, 9.84 feet; thence 98.08 feet along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 262.00 feet and a central angle of 21°26'52"; said curve having a long chord which bears North 00052'33" East, a chord distance of 97.50 feet, more or less,to the north line of said Lot 2, Block 1; thence along said north line South 89°49'32"East, 1.55 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 480 square feet, more or less. L LA/VD 0STE,Q �L DocuSigned ,L 13257 x 1p, �o 1 J6f F1650 71.. 9T OF P E �� C--) Page 50 GROWING POSSIBILITI J:1214055-005 McNian Palnway5ZURVEY WORKINGWuIDCAMRE5ERVE OWNER 0020.Ewg 0£ 6Z \ ----------- OW ROW ----_ \ (7 C 0 co O x N m I I r i D O_ _O m I C11 c z m zz m I 0 ° J � K --i z m = f Z 00 v— a, cn N c —� CO C) Z m_ N °° DO i C7 G� D O N cn —I C z m I I m cn z n I 133 bl1 S � cn m A r- X °° Om m30NdINPVo3 wm N = a m 'rl z m Az D o o � D z D m C� O r T m2 ROW ROW O m O O N --- -- � o z z m o m > A ---- <� r cn O CD fJ 01 cl �• 1� I = z m m T x y y _ = m W N o O m W F D N A 0 o � m —� cn D G7 m m rn O O m " `' cn D I/ —I •• m C N � � m � � z rr _i cn F 1 CO rO N a m n m cn e D O v a% � � 0 � `' �m o m o oLi N O rO z ~ I W OPD vJ OO I N F w N Z ^ U) m „P _ r Fm n SZ, I co cr1 m u Z r it bD i o FROF� 0 7£114090 L'ON '1SN1 Ln i' 0 = m N3W3SV3)41VM3(1IS GHOV,SL cOD o m 111 n� W r 35.00' Ln m n O N Ni N 98 °49'32"W L1 q o 00 Ul �m 2 w `' 0 -0� 09y0 Onj C.O w w m z �jo co 6Z', 0£ cn D OZ 6L m Ii w 0 Page 51 7/tem 77 E IDIAN'-'---- JAMu AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: The Reserve Subdivision South Pedestrian Pathway Easement Page 52 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2022-049803 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 05/25/2022 08:06 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2022-0177 The Reserve Subdivision South PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this 24th day of May_ 20 22, between The Reserve HOA hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", and the City of Meridian, an Idaho municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"; WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of reap property on portions of which the City of Meridian desires to establish a public pathway; and WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to grant an easement to establish a public pathway and provide connectivity to present andfuture portions of the pathway; and WHEREAS, Grantor shall construct the pathway improvements upon the easement described herein; and NOW, THEREFORE,the parties agree as follows; THE GRANTOR does;hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following property, described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing a public pedestrian pathway easement for multiple-use non-motorized recreation, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees that it will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that the Grantor shall repair and maintain the pathway improvements. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the easement hereby granted become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, Ei Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 01/01/2020 then, to such extent such easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that it will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hereinabove written. GRANTOR: The Reserve HOA (JTE OF O ) ss County of Ada ) c 7 This record was acknowledged before me on 13 (date) by L�L64av' 411 (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative cap city, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of :;�& Zkr- f f D/I (name of entj'ty on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity:W ✓'ifSIdeiLZ- (type of authority such as officer or trustee) ;• A)EL � G _ _ MY ��,�; �Co issi xpires: �jM �COMM1ssION 0,; ' x Mry$ ;O o P ' • 9"R OF N L�i •� S%ZON 140 Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 0 1/0 1/2020 Page 54 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 5-24-2022 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 5-24-2022 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 5-24-2022 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature 3-28-2028 My Commission Expires: Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 01/01/2020 Page 55 DocuSion Envelope ID:AE114CB9-8A6E-4C46-8D1E-FC554E456F60 601 Sherman Ave,Suite 1 KELLER Coeur d'Alene,ID 83814 A S S O C I A T E S ' (208)758-8601 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION of SIDEWALK EASEMENT RESERVE OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC. TO CITY OF MERIDIAN That portion of Lot 2, Block 2 of The Reserve Subdivision, according to plat thereof, filed in Book 97 of Plats at pages 12153-12156, as Instrument No. 106197564, records of Ada County, Idaho being situated in the NE 1/4 of Section 30, Township 4 North,Range I East, Boise Meridian, Idaho, described as follows: Commencing at the east 1/4 corner said Section 30,from which the northeast corner of said Section bears North 00°37'33"East, 2,656.62 feet;thence along the east line of said Section North 00°37'33"East 996.25 feet;thence leaving said east line North 89°50'09"West, 35.00 feet, more or less, to the southeast corner of said Lot 2, Block 2;thence continuing along the south line of said Lot 2, Block 2 to North 89°50'09"West 5.00 feet, more or less to the west line of an existing 15 foot Ada County Highway District sidewalk easement,recorded September 21, 2006 as Instrument No. 106151260, records of Ada County, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING: thence continuing along the south line of said Lot 2,North 89°50'09"West, 7.78 feet; thence leaving said south line North 03018'48"East, 96.44 feet, more or less,to said existing Ada County Highway District sidewalk easement; thence along the west line of said sidewalk easement South 44022'23"East,4.60 feet; thence continuing along said sidewalk easement South 00037'33"West, 93.02 feet, more or less,to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 526 square feet, more or less. �\�Np,L lANpsG G\S TER �G Dned a 13257 ox 12 is�s� F�5 a73... N9 PZO TE OF \� �/CF co?? GROWING POSSIBILITIES ' v 4095.0 Meridi NGWWv ERVE 1 0 JI, G to 7 0£ m 6Z, A co 0 0 C7 m � � O 000 0 m 0 A o A O m _u � I m D 00 m 1p IV OD m z 35.00' 0 L2 m 00 Z m Z -1 -n N89°50'09"W i A c� co () n rn n � �Ob£4b0901 'ON ISNI o O Z r lN3W3SV3 NldM301S OHOV S6 R, c z_ m O Z A Z O ✓ IT W V7 o m D cn gun W A Zn Z 9Z O m D om /� D Z p $ � OD w � cri N A00m � � = o D m to 10 A --ir T n p Z z xx z --I i. z C � oy wnm -nX wl y ON a ti (� m = m y � y l C 0 N � 0 O � zunm _ m a i Z m N i y o DTz D mo n m O �O� o o R� --- cn Q m W ROW T F m Z o = --i Cl) v n 1 v W N r Z �m N N m m F-9 a O ff— A V Z r 0 e jo O Z PROF, o o 00 c cn— CD Liz A GZo 000 v_ m m m W cc'n r 1 33 H.L S J a 0 0 G3� 3I30Nb'WWOO N o o 0 O �4 w o O yyo m z �jO ROW ROW N n D OZ 6L m i n w 0 Page 57 Item#5. E IDIAN'-'---- JAMu AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Tustin Subdivision North Pedestrian Pathway Easement Page 58 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2022-049804 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 05/25/2022 08:07 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE E T-222-0173 Tustin Subdivision North EASEMENTPEDESTRIAN PATHWAY THIS AGREEMENT, made this 24th day of May , 202,35 between Tustin ers Association hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", and the City Of Meridian, an Idaho municipal corporation, hereinafter referred tows"Grantee"; ITESE WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian desires to establish a public pathway; and WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to grant an easement to establish a public pathway and provide connectivity to present and future portions of the pathway; and WHEREAS, Grantor shall construct the pathway improvements upon the easement described herein; and NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: THE GRANTOR does hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following property, described on Exhibit " " and depicted on Exhibit " " attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing a public pedestrian pathway easement for multiple-use non-motorized recreation, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees that it will not place or allow to be placed any penrianent structures, irees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by an d betweenthe parties hereto, that the Grantor shall repair and maintain the pathway improvements. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees with the Grantee at should any part of the easement hereby granted become part o , or lie within the boundaries of any public street, Page 59 Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV.01/01/2020 then, to such extent such easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that it will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hereinabove written. GRANTOR: -C' STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada > O`" S is( 4:a. This record was acknowledged before me on (date) by �� (name of individual), (complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following f signing in an indiiidual capacity] on behalf of 1 "%A-i(1 (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: _RW P(CbiGA .(type of authority such as officer or trustee) (stamp) Notary Signature [10)EINIS!rK CAVANAUGHCOMM N0.70156 My Commission Expires:NOTARY PUBLICSTATE OF IOAHOMMISSION EXPIRES:JUNE 16,2023 Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 0 1/0 1/2020 Page 60 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 5-24-2022 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 5-24-2022 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 5-24-2022 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 01/01/2020 Page 61 DocuSign Envelope ID:AE114CB9-8A6E-4C46-8D1 E-FC554E456F60 601 Sherman Ave,Suite 1 KELLER Coeur d'Alene,ID 83814 A S S O C I A T E S ' (208)758-8601 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION of SIDEWALK EASEMENT TUSTIN OWNER'S ASSOCIATION INC. TO CITY OF MERIDIAN That portion of Lot 2,Block 1 of Tustin Subdivision No. 1, according to plat thereof, filed in Book 97 of Plats at pages 12094-12097, as Instrument No. 106183889,records of Ada County, Idaho being situated in the SE 1/4 of Section 30, Township 4 North,Range 1 East,Boise Meridian, Idaho,described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Section 30,from which the East 1/4 corner of said Section bears North 00°25'19"East,2,652.29 feet;thence along the east line of said Section North 00°25'19"East 1785.13 feet; thence leaving said east line North 88°47'45"West,40.00 feet,more or less,to the northeast corner of said Lot 2, Block 1; said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING: thence along the east line of said Lot 2,Block 1 South 00°25'19"West, 366.28 feet; thence continuing along said east line 14.82 feet along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 20.00 feet and a central angle of 42°27'46"; said curve having a long chord which bears South 21°38'40"West, a chord distance of 14.49 feet,more or less,to the north line of an existing 6.5 foot Ada County Highway District sidewalk easement,recorded March 23,2006 as Instrument No. 106044340,records of Ada county; thence along said north line North 89°34'41"West, 5.33 feet; thence leaving said north line North 36°06'00"East, 9.48 feet; thence North 00°26'28"East, 372.15 feet,more or less,to the north line of said Lot 2, Block 1; thence along said north line South 88°47'45"East,4.92 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 1,893 square feet,more or less. L LA NpSG G\S TAR 'PL DocuSigned yfr [) 13257 o 7s��q�fi OF �oS R�cE COPQ�� p 0 JA214095-005 Meridian Pathways\SURVEY WORKINGWutoCAD\TUSTIN OWNER 30020.dwg n c (n ZE 4E Q 7 Z.I OE O 0 0 00 "19 ANS/WOO "3 m m m r D O O m ROW RO' p m z z m —L2 :7 � - z ^ n m 00 0 A) q rn n < co z m rn D m 0 °g C n r ^ n p z m Z l J rn C z cn °° U) z Z 1N3W3SV3)ilVM341S z m N = G� m A oD A IT :7 0 0 W O D z ay o C m 41 ( � > 06 0 K D m � D A IT!z N m c n 00 0 o 00 x. a D < O D C ,oE °' D � = o m co � - D X = m T z Z Z o ° 0om _ g l A p O h mn) `^ O P y m m K 2 mZ:t — W n 00 o = p z cn r m C 0 N N % ZD m C Dr Z a> O!y y o ! � DO N z � r W T My cn " mN W m 1 o /\ w o h a , m 0 - O cq � o � o D o o m "' Z z o o N m 7 kh � ill) V ` O --i I � I A W N Z 1N3W3SV3 N-WEIGIS m I F" r Zr Q -1 m 017Eb70901 'ON 1N3vyn,, Nl z D D n` 1N3W3SV3 NIVM341S CHOV.9'9 Cl) O W cza Z Z p W a00 p Z a, 0) m oo A m PI�OFF A o D 0 -ate ScSj m can C) can p 91 m m m z Y G� twit -z-I 0 n CNn m L 1 v -- ROWRI cn D A I j �10� 00 ii 3A /!10 SSnym.LS '3 if (4 T6ZOC Page 63 7/tem 77 E IDIAN'-'---- JAMu AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Tustin Subdivision South Pedestrian Pathway Easement Page 64 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2022-049805 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 05/25/2022 08:08 AM n, CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2022-0174 Tustin Subdivision South PATHWAYPEDESTRIAN EASEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, ade this 24th day of May 20 2Z- between Tustin Owners Association hereinafter referred to as "Grantor, and the City of Meridian, an Idaho municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as"Grantee"; ITSE : WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian desires to establish a public pathway;.and WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to grant an easement to establish a public pathway and provide connectivity to present and future portions of the pathway;and WHEREAS,Grantor shall construct the pathway improvements upon the easement described herein; and NOW,THEREFORE,the parties agree as follows: THE GRA does hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following property, described on Exhibit " " and;depicted on Exhibit" " attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing apblic pedestrianpathway easement for multiple-use non-motorized recreation, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. THE GRANTOR eby covenants and agrees that it will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that the Grantor shall repair and maintain the pathway improvements. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the easement hereby granted become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, Eil Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV: 1/01/2020 then, to such extent such easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said casement, and that it will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hereinabove written. GRANTOR: -2G -, a, STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on S 5 I I'-(date) by �-er (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of Fed Sii'A Ht-* (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: _1tTA Pf Q%U 4Aj-- (type of authority such as officer or trustee) (stamp) DENISE K CAVANAUGH Notary ure Si nat COMM NO.70156 g 1 1 11 ^ NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires: U 11 L-l' O- STATE OF IDAHO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:JUNE 19,2023 Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 01/01/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 5-24-2022 Attest by Chris Johnson,City Clerk 5-24-2022 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 5-24-2022 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature 3-28-2028 My Commission Expires: Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 41/01/2020 DocuSign Envelope ID:AE114CB9-8A6E-4C46-8D1 E-FC554E456F60 601 Sherman Ave,Suite 1 KELLER Coeur d'Alene,ID 83814 A S S O C I A T E S ' (208)758-8601 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION of SIDEWALK EASEMENT TUSTIN OWNER'S ASSOCIATION INC. TO CITY OF MERIDIAN That portion of Lot 2,Block 2 of Tustin Subdivision No. 1, according to plat thereof, filed in Book 97 of Plats at pages 12094-12097, as Instrument No. 106183889,records of Ada County, Idaho being situated in the SE 1/4 of Section 30, Township 4 North,Range 1 East,Boise Meridian, Idaho,described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Section 30,from which the East 1/4 corner of said Section bears North 00°25'19"East,2,652.29 feet;thence along the east line of said Section North 00°25'19"East 450.11 feet; thence leaving said east line North 88°00'37"West, 30.01 feet,more or less,to the southeast corner of said Lot 1, Block 2;thence continuing along the south line of said Lot 1,Block 2 to North 88°00'37"West 10.00 feet,more or less to the southeast corner of Lot 2,Block 2, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING: thence along the south line of said Lot 2,Block 2 North 88°00'37"West, 5.00 feet; thence leaving said south line North 00°25'19"East, 866.94 feet; thence North 33°07'12"West, 9.12 feet,more or less,to the south line of an existing 6.5 foot Ada County Highway District sidewalk easement,recorded March 23,2006 as Instrument No. 106044340,records of Ada County; thence along said south line South 89°34'41"East,4.79 feet,more or less,to the east line of said Lot 2,Block 2; thence along said east line 14.82 feet along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 20.00 feet and a central angle of 42°27'47"; said curve having a long chord which bears South 20°48'03"East, a chord distance of 14.49 feet; thence continuing along said east line South 00°25'19"West, 861.17 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 4,371 square feet,more or less. L LA/VD G\S T z 'QG DocuSigned b a- 13257 ;6 'f a�ff��44$$FF66 12 G16 OT" �9r�OF �QP�O� COPP�� GROWING POSSIBIL Page68 0 0 JA214095-005 Meridian Pathways\SURVEY WORKING\AutoCAD\TUSTIN OWNER 30210.dwg n c (n Z£ L£ Q O m 6Zj 0£ W �_ 00 0 W C) (DD O L1 () ------- m D 0 0 M r l r 0 (� N w l c7 C C) Z Z zI -J Z � m m o m 00 0 D Z m m - � D m n 06 z > z m D m0 � Oz N p pG7 0£ �1 oZm _ � C z of o O co zm .91 0 o n S17 ti m o m CD v m p m 1N31N3S`d3 NIVM301S o � I r � cn co O � D Z X z m N 0 n D m c D D m -17 y D m n p p CD<a AI D O * D � � m Z p m < = o D m A n -U Z X (� z I O cm z p p m — C Z m ? m o 0 r '� y o ON r �` ~ 01 U) m D G) m < _ °�° y O o z ^' O z m O W -4 N o y o Ap cn - 5 D 0 o Q m l CC/) 00 co D IT! r ^' N N I 00 °° m +) D a N � � y Q � � o � U) n N -1 ° m C N N ti m Z Ln A W Z N z 1 m � III O r 0b£bti0906 'ON v ? �" o o z r g 1N3Amj1SNI1N3A3SV3 � N o a z AWM301S OHOV S 9 op = m D Z Z Z Z W o , F w cw,.w a 0woo c000 co m PRO � 'W FFs A y o 0 o cmi s I 4 - O /� may G) � o � m z C� o N �' � �1 v T -I D Z n :c7 0£ c cn � o 210 z D D Om m 1N3A3SV3 NIVM301S rn > u rn om z o I o �L5 ---Row 6Z 0£ 133MI S ANS/WOO '3 Page 69 7/tem 77 E IDIAN'-'---- JAMu AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Lavender Heights Development Agreement Modification (H-2022-0017) by Breckon Land Design, Located at 2160 E. Lake Hazel Rd., at the Northeast Corner of E. Lake Hazel Rd. and S. Bloomerang Ave. Page 70 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EPI �N,, AND DECISION& ORDER In the Matter of the Request to modify the existing Development Agreement of the Lavender Heights Subdivision(Inst.#2020-106343) for the purpose of updating the concept plan and relevant provisions associated with the development of phase 4. Case No(s).H-2022-0017 For the City Council Hearing Date of: May 3,2022 (Findings on May 18, 2022) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 3,2022,incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 3, 2022, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 3,2022, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 3,2022,incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67, Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Lavender Heights MDA—FILE#H-2022-0017) - 1 - 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 3,2022, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Development Agreement Modification is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of May 3, 2022, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 11- 6B-7C). Notice of Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit,when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time,the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting,the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two(2)year period. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-5B-6.G.1,the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one (1)two(2)year period.Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Lavender Heights MDA—FILE#H-2022-0017) -2- determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11(UDC 11-513-617). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s)and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(d),if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(a), an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted, including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67, Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(1)(d) and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of May 3,2022. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Lavender Heights MDA—FILE#H-2022-0017) -3- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 24th day of May 2022. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER TREG BERNT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison 5-24-2022 Attest: Chris Johnson 5-24-2022 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 5-24-2022 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Lavender Heights MDA—FILE#H-2022-0017) -4- EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORTC� fE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I D A H O HEARING 5/3/2022 Legend DATE: Project Location R-4 u TO: Mayor&City Council R-2� FROM: Joseph Dodson,Associate Planner R-8 R-8 208-884-5533 ;111 milk III SUBJECT: H-2022-0017 Lavender Heights MDA C-C _ R- � 15 RUT LOCATION: Site is located at 2160 E. Lake Hazel Road, at the northeast corner of E. Lake u U RI 8 Hazel Road and S. Bloomerang Avenue, R-8 in the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section ®�� R-4 R-8 32,Township 3N,Range 1E. RUT R_g RUT I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Request to modify the existing Development Agreement of the Lavender Heights Subdivision(Inst. # 2020-106343) for the purpose of updating the concept plan and relevant provisions associated with the development of phase 4. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Mary Wall,Breckon Land Design—PO Box 44465,Boise, ID 83711 B. Owner: Taylor Merrill,LH Development, LLC—PO Box 344,Meridian,ID 83646 C. Representative: Same as Applicant III. NOTICING City Council Posting Date Legal notice published in newspaper 4/17/2022 Radius notice mailed to properties within 500 feet 4/18/2022 Page 1 Public hearing notice sign posted 4/13/2022 NextDoor Posting 4/18/2022 IV. STAFF ANALYSIS History In 2020,the property received annexation and subdivision approval to develop a mixed-use residential development in four(4)phases known as Lavender Heights(H-2020-0009). The first three phases of development depicted detached single family and the fourth phase depicted a basic concept for a multi-family project. The subject modification is specific to phase 4 and the multi-family portion of the development located along the E. Lake Hazel Road frontage. Since the approvals in 2020,the project has received final plat approval for the entire development but no conditional use permit has not been proposed for the approved multi-family lot. Development Agreement Modification The approved Development Agreement(DA) (Inst. #2020-106343) does not include a provision that ties the DA to the submitted multi-family concept plan but does include specific provisions for the subject property(Exhibit VI.A below). The existing multi-family concept plan depicts a drive aisle along the northern property boundary adjacent to the Farr Lateral with multiple apartment buildings along the southern boundary adjacent to Lake Hazel. The Applicant is proposing a new concept plan for the subject R-40 property that does not comport with the proposed multi-family use nor the minimum number of units outlined in the DA. The new concept plan(Exhibit VI.B below) depicts a townhome development and a private street/drive aisle instead of a traditional garden style apartment complex. Further,the submitted concept plan contemplates 30 residential units instead of the anticipated minimum of 36 units outlined in DA provision 5.1 e. For the overall Lavender Heights development, a loss of six(6)units does not affect its overall density in any measurable way but this area of the plat was intended to be the densest area of the development as it is along Lake Hazel and Staff anticipated higher density along this planned mobility corridor and because it is across from Discovery Park. According to the Applicant's narrative,the owner has not yet decided if the property will still be a multi-family project or be subdivided to allow the sale of each unit or groups of units. If the development is a multi-family or townhome project, a future conditional use permit(CUP) is required in the R-40 district. If the units are to be sold off individually or in groups, it also requires the applicant to further subdivide the property. In summary, Staff supports either option as they would contribute to the housing diversity offered within this development and the surrounding area. Based on the process outlined above, Staff will ensure the future multi-family or townhome development complies with the most current UDC standards in effect at the time of application submittal. V. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed MDA per the modified provisions in Section VI.C. B. The Meridian City Council heard these items on May 3,2022. At the public hearing,the Council moved to approve the subject Development Agreement Modification request. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Jon Breckon,Applicant Representative:Todd McDermott, future neighbor: Page 2 b. In opposition:None c. Commenting: Jon Breckon: Todd McDermott: d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Joseph Dodson,Associate Planner f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Support for the proposed change from multi-family to townhomes: 3. key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Confirmation of future applications required for development- b. Details surrounding future development in terms of circulation, open space,parking, etc. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation. a. None Page 3 Page 77 VI. EXHIBITS A. Existing Conceptual Development Plan(not specifically tied to the DA) �F ®dO I r?, 1 1 ri m IF; I l rs 1 t,: 1 / 1 , I 1 1 I C ";V :r yOJ. TAYLOR MERRILL "ss � o 01 LAVENDER HLIGHTS Z 9 �'P Ei! 7 Page 4 B. Proposed Conceptual Development Plan— - I�.._ i „x,N: s n ,a uRaw.on i PARK PLACE AT LAVENDER HEIGHTS n Page 5 Page 79 C. Proposed Revisions to the existing Development Agreement Provisions 1. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat, landscape plan,updated phase 4 concept plan, and conceptual building elevations for- he single family dwellings included in Section VII and the provisions contained herein. 2. The 10-foot multi-use pathway shall be constructed with Phase 1 of the development, except for that area located in the proposed future multi-family or Townhome development along the southern edge of the Farr Lateral, shown as Phase 4. 3. The required secondary access via extension of E. Brace Dr. shall be constructed with Phase 1 of the development. 4. Direct lot access to Lake Hazel Road shall be prohibited. 5. No more than 54 and no less than 3-6 30 units shall be allowed on the R-40 zoned property. Detailed Conditional Use Permit approval is required prior to any development on the R-40 zoned area if a multi-family project is proposed consistent with the approved phase 4 concept plan—if a townhome development is proposed in this area,plat approval is required prior to any development in the R-40 area. 6. With the sale of all future homes in the Lavender Heights Subdivision, all sales information shall have language regarding the future multi-family or Townhome project that will be a part of this development. 7. Per City Council waiver,the Farr Lateral waterway shall remain open in accord with the standards in UDC 11-3A-6. 8. The required street frontage improvements (sidewalk and landscaping) along E. Lake Hazel Road shall be constructed with Phase 1 of the development. Page 6 Page 80 7/tem 77 E IDIAN'-'---- JAMu AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Development Agreement (Vanguard Village H-2021-0081) Between the City of Meridian and Meridian 118, LLC for Property Generally Located 1/4 Mile South of W. Franklin Rd. and S. Ten Mile Rd. Page 81 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2022-049799 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=85 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 05/25/2022 08:05 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES: I City of Meridian 2. Meridian 118, LLC, Owner/Developer THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT(this Agreement),is made and entered into this 24th day of May , 2022 , by and between City of Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho,hereafter called CITY whose address is 33 E.Broadway Avenue,Meridian,Idaho 83642 and Meridian 118, LLC, whose address is 3005 W. Horizon Ridge Parkway, Suite 141, Henderson, Nevada, 89052, hereinafter called OWNER/DEVELOPER. 1. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, Owner is the sole owner, in law and/or equity, of certain land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, described in Exhibit"A", which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full,herein after referred to as the Property; and 1.2 WHEREAS, Idaho Code § 67-6511 A provides that cities may, by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of zoning that the Owner and/or Developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject Property; and 1.3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Section I 1-513-3 of the Unified Development Code("UDC"),which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re-zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS,Owner/Developer has submitted an application for a modification of an existing Development Agreement(Instrument#110115738) to replace it with a new agreement for the proposed development and a rezone on the property as shown in Exhibit"A"under the Unified Development Code,which generally describes how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.5 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer made representations at the public hearings before Planning and Zoning Commission and the Meridian City Council, as to how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.6 WHEREAS, the record of the proceedings for requested rezoning held before Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, includes responses of DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—VANGUARD VILLAGE SUBDIVISION(H-2021-008 1) PAGE I OF 9 E82 government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction, and includes further testimony and comment; and 1.7 WHEREAS, on the 3rd day of May,2022,the Meridian City Council approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order ("Findings"),which have been incorporated into this Agreement and attached as Exhibit`B"; and 1.8 WHEREAS, the Findings require the Owner/Developer to enter into a Development Agreement before the City Council takes final action on final plat; and 1.9 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer deem it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and request; and 1.10 WHEREAS,The Property contained in Exhibit"A"shall no longer be subject to the terms of the existing Development Agreement(Instrument#110115738) or any prior development agreement and shall be bound only by the terms contained in this Agreement. 1.11 WHEREAS, City requires the Owner/Developer to enter into a development agreement for the purpose of ensuring that the Property is developed and the subsequent use of the Property is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement,herein being established as a result of evidence received by the City in the proceedings for zoning designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure zoning designation are in accordance with the amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian on December 19,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179, and the UDC, Title 11. NOW,THEREFORE,in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement the following words,terms, and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for,unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 CITY: means and refers to the City of Meridian, a party to this Agreement, which is a municipal Corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-VANGUARD VILLAGE SUBDIVISION(H-2021-0081) PAGE 2 OF 9 3.2 OWNER/DEVELOPER: means and refers to Meridian 118, LLC, whose address is 3005 W. Horizon Ridge Parkway, Suite 141, Henderson, Nevada, 89052 hereinafter called OWNER/DEVELOPER, the party that owns and is developing said Property and shall include any subsequent owner(s)/developer(s) of the Property. 3.3 PROPERTY: means and refers to that certain parcel(s)of Property located in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as in Exhibit "A" describing a parcel to bound by this Development Agreement and attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall vest the right to develop the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed under the UDC. 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1. Owners/Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. Development of the subject property shall be generally consistent with the site plan, qualified open space exhibit, site amenity exhibit, pedestrian circulation plan, preliminary plat, phasing plan, landscape plan and conceptual building elevations submitted with the applications contained herein. b. All future development, site design and building design shall comply with the guidelines in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (TMISAP) and the standards in the Architectural Standards Manual (ASM), as applicable. The City Council approved alternatives to the design guidelines in the TMISAP consisting of lower roof pitches of 2:12 for the community clubhouse amenity buildings and 3:12 for the townhome garages to allow larger windows with lower sills at the second level; and front patios with railings that frame off the entrances that are covered by the above balconies instead of front stoops due to concerns pertaining to compliance with ADA requirements. c. An encroachment permit is required for any improvements proposed within the Williams pipeline easement.A copy of the executed encroachment agreement shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of any Certificate of Zoning Compliance for this site.Uses such as daycares, schools,hospitals, assisted living facilities,etc. where occupants are not able to leave the area quickly in case of an emergency, are DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-VANGUARD VILLAGE SUBDIVISION(H-2021-0081) PAGE 3 OF 9 discouraged in the vicinity of the pipeline. All development within the Williams pipeline easement shall comply with the Williams Developers' Handbook. d. The street sections for Sunset Point Way and Coral Reef Way shall be constructed in accord with Street Section D (residential collector street) in the TMISAP, which requires 11-foot travel lanes, 6-foot bike lanes, 8-foot parallel parking, 8-foot parkways and minimum 6-foot wide detached sidewalks (see pg. 3-21 and 3-23). e. The street sections for Vanguard Way and Umbria Hills shall be constructed in accord with Street Section C (major collector street) in the TMISAP with a modification that allows (3) 11-foot travel lanes, on-street parking between the Williams pipeline and the eastern boundary of the site, 8-foot parkways and detached 10-foot wide sidewalks/pathways in lieu of on-street bike lanes as required by ACHD. Streetlights are required at a pedestrian scale(see pg. 3-20, 3-22, 3-23). f. Sidewalks, walkways and pathways shall include dedicated crosswalks at the intersection with all streets within commercial activity centers with changes in color, markings,materials,texture and/or surface to distinguish them from the surrounding pavement as set forth in the TMISAP (see pg. 3-28, Crosswalks). g. Development in the R-15 district shall be consistent with the development guidelines contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan(TMISAP)for Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) designated areas. h. Development in the C-C district shall be consistent with the development guidelines contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan(TMISAP)for Mixed Use Commercial (MU-COM) designated areas. i. Development in the M-E district shall be consistent with the development guidelines contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (TMISAP) for Mixed Employment(ME) designated areas. j. Development in the H-E district shall be consistent with the development guidelines contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (TMISAP) for High- Density Employment(HDE) designated areas. k. Public art in a high quality of design shall be provided in shared spaces and incorporated into the design of streetscapes as set forth in the TMISAP (see pg. 3- 47). 1. Design elements shall be provided within the overall development as required in the Application of the Design Elements matrix on pg. 3-49 of the TMISAP. in. The subject property shall be subdivided prior to submittal of any Certificate of Zoning Compliance application(s) and/or building permit application(s). The Applicant may submit a design review application(s) to finalize building design DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-VANGUARD VILLAGE SUBDIVISION(H-2021-0081) PAGE 4 OF 9 prior to recordation of the final plat(s). n. The applicant shall submit a Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application to the Planning Division for approval of all future uses on the site to ensure compliance with the Unified Development Code, Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan, Comprehensive Plan, Architectural Standards Manual, and provisions of the development agreement contained herein, prior to issuance of building permits for any structure(s)within this site. 6. COMPLIANCE PERIOD This Agreement must be fully executed within six (6) months after the date of the Findings for the annexation and zoning or it is null and void. 7. DEFAULT/CONSENT TO DE-ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: 7.1 Acts of Default.In the event Owner/Developer,or Owner's/Developer's heirs,successors, assigns,or subsequent owners of the Property or any other person acquiring an interest in the Property,fail to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement in connection with the Property,this Agreement may be terminated by the City upon compliance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 7.2 Notice and Cure Period. In the event of Owner/Developer's default of this agreement, Owner/Developer shall have thirty(30)days from receipt of written notice from City to initiate commencement of action to correct the breach and cure the default, which action must be prosecuted with diligence and completed within one hundred eighty (180) days; provided, however, that in the case of any such default that cannot with diligence be cured within such one hundred eighty (180) day period, then the time allowed to cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. 7.3 Remedies. In the event of default by Owner/Developer that is not cured after notice from City as described in Section 7.2, City shall, upon satisfaction of the notice and hearing procedures set forth in Idaho Code section 67-6511A,have the right,but not a duty, to de-annex all or a portion of the Property, reverse the zoning designations described herein, and terminate City services to the de-annexed Property, including water service and/or sewer service.Further,City shall have the right to file an action at law or in equity to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. Because the covenants, agreements,conditions,and obligations contained herein are unique to the Property and integral to City's decision to annex and/or re-zone the Property, City and Owner/Developer stipulate that specific performance is an appropriate, but not exclusive, remedy in the event of default. Owner/Developer reserves all rights to contest whether a default has occurred. 7.4 Choice of Law and Venue.This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereto shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho,including all matters of construction,validity,performance,and enforcement.Any action brought DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—VANGUARD VILLAGE SUBDIVISION(H-2021-0081) PAGE 5 OF 9 Page 86 by any parry hereto shall be brought within Ada County, Idaho. 7.5 Delay. In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either Owner/Developer or City is delayed for causes that are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes, the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. 7.6 Waiver.A waiver by City of any default by Owner/Developer of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the default and defaults waived and shall neither bar any other rights or remedies of City nor apply to any subsequent default of any such or other covenants and conditions. 8. INSPECTION: Owner/Developer shall,immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the Property as required by this Agreement or by City ordinance or policy,notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other ordinances of the City that apply to said Property. 9. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: City shall record this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits,and submit proof of such recording to Owner/Developer,prior to the third reading of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the re-zoning of the Property by the City Council. If for any reason after such recordation, the City Council fails to adopt the ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property contemplated hereby,the City shall execute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement. 10. ZONING: City shall, following recordation of the duly approved Agreement, enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the Property as specified herein. 11. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The City may also require surety bonds,irrevocable letters of credit,cash deposits,certified check or negotiable bonds,as allowed under the UDC,to insure the installation of required improvements,which the Owner/Developer agree to provide,if required by the City. 12. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed,completed,and accepted by the City,or sufficient surety of performance is provided by Owner/Developer to the City in accordance with Paragraph 11 above. 13. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That Owners and/or Developer agree to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian unless otherwise provided by this Agreement. 14. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3)days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—VANGUARD VILLAGE SUBDIVISION(H-2021-0081) PAGE 6 OF 9 Page 87 CITY: with copy to: City Clerk City Attorney City of Meridian City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 OWNER/DEVELOPER: Meridian 118, LLC 3005 W. Horizon Ridge Parkway, Suite 141 Henderson,Nevada 89052 14.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 15. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement,the prevailing party shall be entitled,in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 16. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof,and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 17. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including City's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the Owner/Developer, each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed.City agrees,upon written request of Owner/Developer or any successor owner, to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination or partial termination of this Agreement if City, in its sole and reasonable discretion,had determined that Owner/Developer or the successor owner as to their property have fully performed their obligations,and there are no remaining continuing or on-going obligations that are the subject of the termination or partial termination under this Agreement.A partial successor owner may also request the City to modify the Agreement to separate the successor owner's property and applicable conditions and restrictions into a separate Development Agreement. 18. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—VANGUARD VILLAGE SUBDIVISION(H-2021-0081) PAGE 7 OF 10 Page 88 Item#8. 20. COOPERATION OF THE PARTIES: In the event of any legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third party(including a governmental entity or official)challenging the validity of any provision in this Agreement,the parties agree to cooperate in defending such action or proceeding. 21. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition and understandings between Owner/Developer and City relative to the subject matter hereof,and there are no promises,agreements,conditions or understanding,either oral or written, express or implied, between Owner/Developer and City, other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided,no subsequent alteration,amendment,change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns,and pursuant,with respect to City,to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. 21.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing re-zoning of the subject Property herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s)in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 22. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective on the date the Meridian City Council shall adopt the amendment to the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property and execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. [end of text; acknowledgements, signatures and Exhibits A and B] DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—VANGUARD VILLAGE SUBDIVISION(H-2021-0081) PAGE 8 OF 9 Page 89 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. OWNERS/DEVELOPER: Meridian 118, LLC By:Tan cs Z 4Al- CITY OF MERIDIAN ATTEST: By: Mayor Robert E. Simison 5-24-2022 Chris Johnson, City Clerk 5-24-2022 Nuada STATE OF-I-9AHE) ) GarK : ss: County of A4a- ) On this CO day of 202.2,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared A(IM ES Zf,Ik r known or identified to me to be the of Meridian 118, LLC and the person who signed above and acknowledged to me that he executed the same o ehalf of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. Wf PATRICIA PE:NA Notary Public for Notary Pubtic,State oada No. 21-4623- Residing at: q2 tp S oAo n NO 9gOl► ,. My Appt.Exp.June 1025 My Commission Expires: 0 I"1 2S STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) On this 24th day of May 2022 , before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson,known or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk,respectively,of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City,and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: Meridian, Idaho Commission expires: 3-28-2028 Item#8. Exhibit A TO ENGINEERS Project No: 190580 Date: May 16, 2022 Page 1 of 2 MERIDIAN 118 A parcel of land, situated in a portion of SE1/4 of the NW1/4, NE1/4 of the SW1/4 and the NW1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 15, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: A) COMMENCING at a brass cap monument marking the west one-quarter corner of said Section 15, thence along the south boundary of said NW1/4, B) S.89014'36"E. 1322.75 feet to the center-west one-sixteenth corner of said Section 15 and the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, along the west boundary of said SE1/4 of the NW1/4, 1) N.0003956"E. 1328.79 feet to the northwest one-sixteenth corner of said Section 15; thence, along the north boundary of said SE1/4 of the NW1/4, 2) S.89015'14"E. 1321.49 feet to the center-north one-sixteenth corner of said Section 15; thence, along the east boundary of said SE1/4 of the NW1/4, 3) S.00036'37"W. 1328.96 feet to the center one-quarter corner of said Section 15; thence, along the north boundary of said NW1/4 of the SE1/4, 4) S.89014'39"E. 1321.43 feet to the center-east one-sixteenth corner of said Section 15; thence, leaving along the east boundary of said NW1/4 of the SE1/4, 5) S.00033'00"W. 1299.29 feet to the north right-of-way line of Interstate 84; thence, along said right-of-way line the following seven courses: 6) S.88047'49"W. 312.10 feet; thence, 7) N.86048'58"W. 675.49 feet; thence, 8) N.84005'20"W. 546.27 feet; thence, 9) N.8402221"W. 139.20 feet; thence, 10) N.81025'39"W. 569.26 feet; thence, z 2471 S.Titanium Place Meridian.ID 83642 P: 208.323.2288 to•engineers.com Page 91 Item#8. T-0 ENGINEERS Project No: 190580 Date: May 16, 2022 Page 2 of 2 11) N.85010'48"W. 150.33 feet; thence, 12) N.81021'31"W. 266.05 feet to the west boundary of said NE114 of the SW114; thence along said boundary, 13) N.00039'32E. 1095.79 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 115.26 acres, more or less i� ► 3765 4pF OF it ov��� 2 2471 5.Titanium Place Meridian,ID 83642 P: 208.323.2288 to-engineers.com Page 92 [7 OC1 w o � Ino z r r cr y Qw0 W u _ LLI 2: 2 4 00 = � � n x LC) Na��� w � rLLoo ' y � Z 001zU o Z - Q W ¢Do W = Q N 'ir S� 0� Q L co ]J Z 2 C-)i w � N b ce) w v Z z w L] LLJC) 0 a W ~ wU d � 0U) o o 9s'sz M„t tS£.00s .6Z'66Z L M d££.00S r LU CD m W U U J g = 2 u7 �'�l z o N v I— Uj LL, Q to C14 w 0 K)f m a Q w I W ~ z 0 cep °Z a N r�S Z N5f M It le) Z Q pdp d f N �� J m U�7 2co Z 00 (7) Q) 00 CDP rW N I z N f+] d In w J J J J J MF a z ztCV N Z+ U U U O Q a zz � m �c O od ao � 2 C + n M or � � 3 z N rn �I CD z co to r a � w z ui20 m CSC �' [n "��0 � LO � LU � n 1 L N 20 °z _ _ - 0 -' AL'SZ£L 3a95.fi£.00N 6L'960 L 30£.6£.00N ui z tu uj F � U avow lv3 MOO 19 3: co � Page 93 EXHIBIT B Item#8. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW E IDIAN�' AND DECISION&ORDER q, In the Matter of the Request for Modification to the Existing Development Agreement(Inst. #110115738)to Replace it with a New Agreement for the Proposed Development; Rezone of 7.06- Acres from the C-C to the H-E Zoning District; 17.38-Acres from the C-C &H-E Zoning Districts to the M-E Zoning District; and 40.33-acres from the R-40,C-C and M-E Zoning Districts to the R- 15 Zoning District; and 1.10-Acres from the H-E to the C-C Zoning District; Preliminary Plat Consisting of Eight(8)Building Lots& Six(6)Common Lots on 115.26-Acres of Land in the R-15, C-C,H-E and M-E Zoning Districts for Vanguard Village Subdivision; and,Conditional Use Permit for a Multi-Family Development Consisting of 552 Dwelling Units on 40.33-Acres of Land in the R-15 Zoning District for Vanguard Crossing,by Insight Investment Partners. Case No(s). H-2021-0081 For the City Council Hearing Date of: April 19,2022 (Findings on May 3, 2022) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 19,2022, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 19,2022,incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 19,2022, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 19,2022,incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code,and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance,established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR VANGUARD VILLAGE—MDA,RZ,PP,CUP H-2021-0081 - I - Page 94 Item#8. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 19,2022, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for a modification to the existing Development Agreement,Rezone, Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit is hereby approved per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of April 19,2022,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years.Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 11- 613-7C). Notice of Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit,when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time,the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting,the final plat must be signed by the City FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR VANGUARD VILLAGE—MDA,RZ,PP,CUP H-2021-0081 -2- Page 95 Item#8. Engineer within this two(2)year period. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-5B-6.G.1,the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one(1)two(2)year period. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11(UDC 11-513-617). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement.Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(d), if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(a),an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted,including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67,Idaho Code.This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-652 1(1)(d)and 67-8003,an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of April 19, 2022 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR VANGUARD VILLAGE—MDA,RZ,PP,CUP H-2021-0081 -3- Page 96 Item#8. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 3rd day of May , 2022. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED AYE COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT JOE BORTON VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER TREG BERNT VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED AYE MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Si iso 5-3-2022 Attest: 3r. C Q (:iPol E IDIAN¢ Chris Johnso 5-3-2 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant,Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: -w Dated: 5-3-2022 City Clerk's Office rh FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR VANGUARD VILLAGE—MDA,RZ,PP,CUP H-2021-0081 -4- Page 97 Item#8. STAFF REPORTC�(fE IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ®A H O HEARING April 19, 2022 Legend DATE: f �ie'a'�Luca fiar TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: H-2021-0081 Vanguard Village—MDA, RZ, PP, _ CUP LOCATION: Generally located 1/4 mile south of W. - }� Yt. Franklin Rd. and S.Ten Mile Rd., in the middle of Section 15, T.3N. R.1 W. r i a 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant has submitted an application for the following: • Modification to the existing Development Agreement(Inst. #110115738) to replace it with a new agreement for the proposed development; • Rezone of 7.06-acres from the C-C to the H-E zoning district; 17.38-acres from the C-C &H- E zoning districts to the WE zoning district; and 40.33-acres from the R-40, C-C and WE zoning districts to the R-15 zoning district; and 1.10-acres from the H-E to the C-C zoning district; • Preliminary Plat consisting of 8 building lots& 6 common lots on 115.26-acres of land in the R-15, C-C, H-E and WE zoning districts for Vanguard Village subdivision; and, • Conditional Use Permit for a multi-family development consisting of 552 dwelling units on 40.33-acres of land in the R-15 zoning district for Vanguard Crossing. 11. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 115.21 acres overall Existing/Proposed Zoning R-40,M-E,C-C and H-E(existing)/H-E,M-E,C-C and R- 15(proposed) Future Land Use Designation Mixed Use—Commercial(MU-COM);Medium High- Density Residential(MHDR); Mixed Employment(ME); High Density Employment(HDE) Page 1 Page 98 Item#8. Description Details Page Existing Land Use(s) Vacant/agricultural land Proposed Land Use(s) Multi-family residential,vertically integrated residential, light industrial,commercial/retail,research and development and other uses. Lots(#and type;bldg./common) 8 buildable lots/6 common lots Phasing Plan(#of phases) 4 5 phases(plat);2 phases(multi-family development) Number of Residential Units(type 552 multi-family apartment units f of units) Physical Features(waterways, The Williams gas pipeline bisects this site hazards, flood plain,hillside) Neighborhood meeting date;#of 8/17/21 attendees: History(previous approvals) AZ-09-008 Meridian Crossing(Ord.#10-1467;DA Inst. #110115738);ROS#7623(Inst.#106170019 2006) B. Community Metrics Description Details Pg Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Yes • Requires ACHD No Commission Action A Traffic Impact Study(TIS)was submitted. (yes/no) Access (Arterial/Collectors/State Hwy/Local)(Existing and Proposed) Traffic Level of Service Stub Street/Interconnectivity/Cros s Access Existing Road Network Existing Arterial Sidewalks/ Buffers Proposed Road Improvements Fire Service • Distance to Fire 2 miles Station • Fire Response Time Falls within 5:00 minute response time area-nearest station is Fire Station#2—can meet response time goals 6. Resource Reliability 85%-does meet the target goal of 80%or greater • Risk Identification 4—current resources would not be adequate to supply service (risk factors include fire-fighting in multi-story buildings&a large gathering of people in a single location) * Accessibility Project meets all required access,road widths and turnaround. • Special/resource Project will require an aerial device; can meet this need in the needs required timeframe if a truck company is required. • Water Supply Varies as there are multiple size buildings in which some will require fire sprinkler systems. Page 2 Page 99 Item#8. Description Details P • Other Resources West Ada School District • Capacity of Schools Approved prelim Approved MF Projected plat parcels per units per Students from Enrollment Ca acit attendance area attendance area A REgyed Dev. • #of Students Enrolled Chaparral Elementary 552 700 730 1549 209 Meridian Middle School 1070 12SO 800 1798 136 Meridian High School 1759 207S 3343 2300 S27 School of Choice Options Chief Joseph Elementary-Arts 498 700 N/A N/A Barbara Morgan STEM Academy 414 Soo N/A N/A • Predicted#of students 83 generated from proposed development Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Services • Sewer Shed • Estimated Project Sewer ERU's • WRRF Declining Balance • Project Consistent with WW Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts/concerns • Flow is committed • See Public Works Site Specific Conditions in Section VII.B Water • Distance to Water Directly adjacent Services • Pressure Zone 2 • Estimated Project See application Water ERU's • Water Quality None Concerns • Project Consistent Yes with Water Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns • Complete plans for water must be reviewed by Engineering before final plat approval of any phase,the plans provided are not adequate for a full review. • See Public Works Site Specific Conditions in Section VII.B Page 3 Page 100 Item#8. C. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend h 00 Legend Pr?rect Locaior; - ns i ` F,c:e-- Loc€ Sor r �.......�...... M1 R side 1 fie! Ity_Resldenl - MU-Res T-- rty - tom. Medium ensity M Re�sidenti61 11 Zoning Map Planned Development Map R-8 LegendRulLegond r�Prcipect Luca k-filo r -y Plct Luca c ftm,� L C7 R, � C-N CriyLn9tER-15 RCS- r — F:anne j F ors e.s • +AAI Ml � R=1 5 C-C y R-4D RUT f/ `• -- RRi' f A. Applicant: Airalea Newman,Insight Investment Partners—3005 W. Horizon Ridge Parkway, Ste. 141, Henderson,NV 89052 B. Owners: James Zeiter, Meridian 118,LLC—3005 W. Horizon Ridge Parkway, Ste. 141, Henderson,NV 89052 Page 4 Page 101 Item#8. C. Representative: JoAnn Butler, Butler Spink, LLP—967 E. Parkcenter Blvd., Ste. 313, Boise, ID 83706 III. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Notification published in 2/1/2022 4/3/2022 newspaper Notification mailed to property owners within 300 feet 2/1/2022 4/4/2022 Applicant posted public hearing 2/5/2022 4/6/2022 notice on site Nextdoor posting 1/31/2022 4/5/2022 IV. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS (Comprehensive Plan and Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan) Land Use: The Future Land Use Map(FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan designates the northern 28.5+/-acres of this site as Medium-High Density Residential(MHDR); the northeast 21+/- acres as Mixed Use—Commercial(MU-COM); the southwest 20.5+/-acres as Mixed Employment (ME); and the southeast 45.5+/-acres as High-Density Employment(HDE). There is also a school site designated on the FLUM in this general area. This site is within the area governed by the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan TM( ISAP)• A school site is not included in the proposed development plan.The school district states they don't currently own a site in this area and don't have any prospects of land to purchase in this area at this time; if a developer desires to donate a site in this area,the school district would consider it. MHDR: MHDR designated areas should include a mix of relatively dense multi-family housing types such as row houses,townhouses,condominiums and apartment buildings and complexes with a density ranging from 8-15 units per acre with a target density of 12 units per acre. These areas should be located around or near more intensively developed areas such as Mixed Use—Commercial or Employment areas in order to provide convenient access to these activity and employment centers to the greatest number of residents. A mix of multi-family residential housing types consisting of townhomes, flats and garden style apartments is proposed to develop on the northern 40 acres of the development area which is designated as MHDR,ME,HDE and MU-COM on the FLUM. A gross density of 13.63 units/acre is proposed,which falls within the desired density range in the MHDR designated area.Because the existing ME, HDR and MU-COM designations abutting the MHDR designation on this site consist of less than 50%of the site,the Applicant proposes the MHDR designation apply to the entire 40-acre portion of the site as allowed in the Comprehensive Plan(see pg. 3-9). The proposed R-15 zoning encompasses approximately 12 more acres than is currently designated MHDR on the FLUM and 23+/-acres more than currently zoned R-40. See Pg. 3-6 in the TMISAP for more information on the MHDR designation. The proposed multi-family development is located in close proximity(directly to the north and west) to MU-COM, ME and HDE designated land which is proposed to and anticipated to develop with higher intensity commercial and employment uses. The proposed residential uses will provide housing options in close proximity to these uses with convenient pedestrian access between them, Page 5 Page 102 Item#8. which should reduce traffic in the area. This development will provide a transition between the higher intensity uses and existing single-family homes to the north in Baraya Subdivision. ME: The purpose of ME designated areas is to encourage a diversity of compatible land uses that may include a mixture of office, research and specialized employment areas, light industrial including manufacturing and assembly, and other miscellaneous uses. These areas generally do not include retail and consumer service uses serving the wider community. However, a small amount of retail and service establishments,primarily serving employees and users of the ME areas or nearby industrial areas, are allowed.ME areas should provide a variety of flexible sites for small,local or start-up businesses,as well as sites for large national or regional enterprises. ME areas should be designed to encourage multimodal travel and convenient circulation to supporting uses located within the area. It's anticipated that buildings will range in height from 1-4 stories,have total floor areas of 10,000- 1,000,000 square feet,and that FAR will exceed .75. The ME designated area is intended to develop with a mix of flex uses of approximately 410,000 s.£, which may include office, light industrial and other uses7*1entvA4+--&410,000 s rFeseaFeh and deele� �eenent such as distribution and light manufacturing. Building heights will range from 2 1 to 4 stories. This area is located at the southwest corner of the development and abuts Mixed Employment designated land to the west and I-84 to the south and will have access to a collector street as desired. Medium-high density residential uses are proposed to the north and high-density employment and commercial uses are proposed to the east with this application. The proposed M-E zoning encompasses approximately 8 more acres than is currently designated ME on the FLUM and 4 acres more than currently zoned M-E. See Pg. 3-11 in the TMISAP for more information on the ME designation. MU-COM: The purpose of MU-COM designated areas is to encourage the development of a mixture of office,retail,recreational, employment and other miscellaneous uses,with supporting multi-family or single-family attached residential uses. This designation requires developments to integrate the three major use categories—residential, commercial and employment. Traditional neighborhood design concepts with a strong pedestrian-oriented focus are essential. Development within these areas exhibit quality building and site design and an attractive pedestrian environment with a strong street character. The MU-COM designated area is proposed to develop with a mix of uses including a vertically integrated residential project and commercial/retail uses. The proposed C-C zoning is located along the northern portion of the east parcel abutting the Mixed Use—Commercial designated property to the north at the entry to the development with access to a non-residential collector street as desired. High-density employment uses are proposed to the south and mixed employment uses are proposed to the west with this application. The proposed C-C zoning is approximately 3 acres fewer than is currently designated MU-COM on the FLUM and is 30+/- acres less than currently zoned C-C. See Pg. 3-9 in the TMISAP for more information on the MU-COM designation. HDE: HDE designated areas are recommended as predominantly office, research and specialized employment areas and generally do not include retail and consumer service uses serving the wider community. Limited retail and service establishments primarily serving employees and users of the HDE areas are encouraged. HDE areas should provide a variety of flexible sites for small, local or startup businesses,as well as sites for large national or regional enterprises. They should be designed to encourage multimodal travel and convenient circulation to supporting services located within the area. Whenever possible, HDE areas should provide restaurants, lodging and other services in support of the employment uses. High Density Employment areas should be designed as compact urban centers rather than lower density suburban-style development. Buildings are anticipated to range in height from 1-6 stories,have total floor areas of 10,000-1,000,000 square feet with a FAR exceeding Page 6 Page 103 Item#8. 1.0. Designs that promote open space and parks are strongly encouraged. Structured parking is also allowed. This area is intended to develop with non-residential uses such as a corporate campus,business and professional office space,research and development,and limited retail and service uses (approximately 380,000 square feet). The proposed H-E zoning is approximately 20+/-acres fewer than is currently designated HE on the FLUM but is only 1.6+/-acres more than currently zoned H-E. See Pg. 3-11 in the TMISAP for more information on the HDE designation. Overall,the development area associated with the MHDR designation has increased 23+/-acres with R-15 zoning, the ME designated area has increased 4+/-acres with M-E zoning, the MU-C area is 3+/-acres less with C-C zoning, and the HDE area is 20+/- acres less with H-E zoning. Because the FLUM is a guide and not parcel-specific,adjacent abutting designations, when appropriate and approved as part of a public hearing with a land development application,may be used with some exceptions(see pg. 3-9 Comprehensive Plan for more information).All of the changes fall within the guidance provided; therefore, Staff is in general support of the proposed development and zoning. Transportation: The Transportation System Map in the TMISAP depicts collector streets through this site that connect to S. Black Cat Rd.,W. Franklin Rd. and S. Ten Mile Rd., adjacent arterial streets. The collector street network depicted on the proposed development plan is generally consistent with the Transportation System Map (see pg. 3-18 in the TMISAP). The Street Section Map depicts Street Section D (residential collector) as being appropriate to serve the local access needs of residential, live/work, and commercial activities within a residential neighborhood or mixed-use residential area. 4 A f ,r t; ra ne rave nc a Parking Lane �, lane Pukltg S t r e e t S e c t I o n D rur44a-drb Mtaeae The collector streets (i.e. Coral Reef Way& Sunset Point Way) in the multi-family portion of the development in the northern 40 acres of the development should be constructed in accord with this street section. Streetlights should be placed in the dry utilities corridor on either side of the street. The Street Section Map depicts Street Section C(major collector) as being appropriate to provide access from adjacent arterial streets(i.e. Black Cat, Franklin& Ten Mile Roads) into the employment area. Streetlights should be located in the tree lawn area and should be of a pedestrian scale. #A e ave ne e e I Uwe Lana [,I w 5lreet Section C 34 CurGro•cu6dlStance Page 7 Page 104 Item#8. The collector streets (i.e. Vanguard Way&Umbria Hills) in the commercial mixed-use area in the southern portion of the development should be constructed in accord with this street section with the following exceptions as required by ACHD: (3)travel lanes instead of(2); and 10-foot wide detached sidewalks/pathways instead of 6-foot wide detached sidewalks in lieu of on-street bike lanes. On- street parking is allowed aloniz Vanguard Way between the Williams viveline easement and the eastern boundary of the site as proposed. Design: The TMISAP emphasizes the quality of the built environment and includes recommendations on the location,scale, form,height and design quality of public and private buildings in the form of building placement,orientation,and massing; types and design treatments for building frontages; as well as recommendations for the incorporation of art in public and private projects. The design elements in the Plan are intended to serve as the basic framework on any given project within the Ten Mile Area. The primary components that the design elements address include: architecture and cultural heritage;building placement whereby build-to lines are identified; heights and step backs; the definition of a base, body and top; and frontage types. The proposed development should be designed in the accord with the TMISAP (see pgs. 3-31 thru 3-51).See the Application of the Design Elements table on pg. 3-49 to determine specific design element requirements according to the associated FLUM designation.Future development applications should include the applicable design elements. Comprehensive Plan Policies: The following Comprehensive Plan Policies are applicable to this development: • "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and urban services at the time of final approval, and in accord with any adopted levels of service for public facilities and services."(3.03.03F) City water and sewer service is available and can be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. • "Encourage diverse housing options suitable for various income levels, household sizes, and lifestyle preferences."(2.01.01) The proposed multi family development will include a mix of apartments,flats and townhome-style units with choices between 1-, 2-and 3-bedroom units.A variety of amenities are proposed for different preferences. • "With new subdivision plats,require the design and construction of pathways connections, easy pedestrian and bicycle access to parks, safe routes to schools, and the incorporation of usable open space with quality amenities." (2.02.01A) Several multi-use pathway segments are proposed within this development for interconnectivity between the residential and commercial and employment portions of the development and open space and site amenity areas. • "Encourage the development of high quality,dense residential and mixed use areas near in and around Downtown,near employment,large shopping centers,public open spaces and parks,and along major transportation corridors,as shown on the Future Land Use Map." (2.02.01 E) The proposed project provides high quality, dense residential units that complement and provide a transition between the commercial and employment areas to the south and the Page 8 Page 105 Item#8. single-family residential to the north and is located along I-84, a major transportation corridor. • "Encourage and support mixed-use areas that provide the benefits of being able to live, shop, dine,play,and work in close proximity, thereby reducing vehicle trips, and enhancing overall livability and sustainability."(3.06.02B) The proposed residential uses will provide housing options in close proximity to employment, shopping, dining and other commercial uses which should reduce vehicle trips and enhance livability and sustainability of the area. • "Encourage the development of supportive commercial near employment areas."(3.06.02C) The proposed commercial and retail uses should provide supportive uses for the proposed employment area. • "Require pedestrian circulation plans to ensure safety and convenient access across large commercial and mixed-use developments."(3.07.02A) A pedestrian circulation plan is included in Section VII.C.3 for the southern portion of the development and in Section VIII.Dfor the northern portion of the development which provides safe pedestrian connectivity throughout the development. • "Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development." (3.03.03A) The proposed development will connect to City water and sewer systems;services are required to be provided to and though this development in accord with current City plans. • "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and urban services at the time of final approval, and in accord with any adopted levels of service for public facilities and services."(3.03.03F) City water and sewer services are available to this site and can be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. The emergency response times for Police Dept. and Fire Dept. meets the established goals. • "Where feasible, encourage large transmission and pipeline utility corridors to function as transitional buffers,parkland,pathways,and gathering places within and adjacent to their right-of-way."(3.07.01 E) The Williams pipeline crosses this site; within the easement, a landscaped common area with a meandering multi-use pathway and seating areas are proposed. • "Require appropriate landscaping,buffers,and noise mitigation with new development along transportation corridors(setback, vegetation, low walls,berms, etc.)."(3.07.01 C) A 50-foot wide landscaped street buffer is required to be provided along the southern boundwy of the site adjacent to I-84;Staff recommends a berm is included in the buffer. • "Encourage the integration of public art as an integrated component with new development." (5.03.01 B) Public art is proposed along the multi-use pathway in the center of the project, which will take the form of sculptures that create points of interest along the pathways and speak to the nexus of the region's heritage and its future. Page 9 Page 106 Item#8. • "Require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks, water and sewer utilities."(3.03.03G) Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter and sidewalks are proposed as rewired with this development. In summary, Staff believes the proposed development plan is generally consistent with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan for this area per the analysis above. V. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ANALYSIS(UDC) A. Development Agreement Modification (MDA): The existing Development Agreement(DA)was approved with the annexation of the property in 2009(Meridian Crossing AZ-09-008; Inst. #110115738). the provisions of such and the approved conceptual development plan and sample building elevations are included below in Section VII.A. The Applicant proposes a modification to the DA to amend and restate the DA with a termination of the existing DA. All property governed by the original DA will be governed by the amended and restated DA. A new conceptual development plan is included in Section VII.A.3 for the proposed development and new recommended provisions for the agreement are included in Section VIII.A.I based on the analysis of the project below and applicable UDC and TMISAP provisions. Some of the existing DA provisions that are still applicable are also recommended to be included in the amended and restated DA. B. Rezone(RZ): A rezone is requested of 7.06-acres from the C-C to the H-E zoning district; 17.38-acres from the C-C&H-E zoning districts to the M-E zoning district;and 40.33-acres from the R-40, C-C and M-E zoning districts to the R-15 zoning district;and 1.10-acres from the H-E to the C-C zoning district as shown on the zoning map exhibit in Section VII.B. A conceptual development plan and elevations are included in Section VII.A.3 and A.4 that shows how the site is anticipated to develop. All of these zoning districts currently exist on the site except for the R-15 district which is proposed to replace the R-40 district. The rezone proposes to reconfigure the boundaries of these zoning districts into more developable areas consistent with the proposed road layout and concept plan. The existing zoning consists of 27 acres of H-E, 25 acres of M-E, 16.83 acres of R40 and 48 acres of C-C zoning. The rezone will result in 28.6 acres of H-E (an increase of 1.6 acres), 29.07 acres of M-E(an increase of 4.07 acres),40.33 acres of R-15 (an increase of 23.5 acres of residential)and 17.27 acres of C-C(a decrease of 30.73 acres)zoning overall. The proposed R-15 zoning is located on the northern 40 acres of the site,which abuts Baraya Subdivision and R-15 zoned single-family residential properties. Medium-high density residential uses are planned to the west and the property to the east is designated Mixed Use—Commercial. Mixed employment and commercial uses are proposed to the south with this application. A multi- family development containing 552 dwelling units at a gross density of 13.63 units/acre is proposed to develop in the R-15 zone. This development will provide a transition between mixed employment uses to the south and lower density single-family homes to the north. The residences proposed for this site will allow people to live and work in the nearby existing and planned commercial and employment areas in the vicinity, thus reducing traffic on area roads by allowing employees to walk or bike to work, shopping and services.Note: The existing R-40 and C-C Page 10 Page 107 Item#8. zoning districts allow a multi family development with a conditional use permit; however, Staff requested the Applicant rezone the overall area to a zone(i.e. R-15) that better represents the land use. The proposed C-C zoning is located along the northern portion of the east parcel abutting the Mixed Use—Commercial designated property to the north at the entry to the development with access to a non-residential collector street as desired. High-density employment uses are proposed to the south and mixed employment uses are proposed to the west with this application.Allowed uses in the C-C district should be larger scale and broader mix of retail, office, and service uses. This area is proposed to develop with a mix of uses including a vertically integrated residential project and commercial/retail uses. The proposed M-E zoning is located at the southwest corner of the development and abuts Mixed Employment designated land to the west and I-84 to the south and will have access to a collector street as desired. Medium-high density residential uses are proposed to the north and high-density employment and commercial uses are proposed to the east with this application. Allowed uses in the M-E district consist of offices, medical centers,research and development facilities, and light industrial uses with ancillary support services. This area is intended to develop with flex uses of approximately 410,000 s.£,which may include office, light industrial and other uses, long i k a 4W,9Wa€•reseal}-adevelepm fA-eempenent such as distribution and light manufacturing. The proposed H-E zoning is located along the southeast portion of the site adjacent to I-84, in close proximity to Ten Mile interchange, as desired. Mixed employment uses are proposed to the west and commercial uses to the north with this application; I-84 borders the site on the south. Allowed uses in the H-E district consist of corporate headquarters, office complexes,research and development facilities and complementary services such as conference centers and hospitality uses with limited retail. This area is intended for non-residential uses such as a corporate campus, business and professional office space,research and development,and limited retail and service uses(approximately 380,000 square feet). Proposed Use Analysis: A variety of uses are proposed including a multi-family development,a vertically integrated residential project,retail,office, flex space, light industrial,research and development, and other uses; see UDC Tables 11-2A-2 and 11-2B-2 for allowed uses in the applicable zoning districts. Compliance with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7 and 11-2B-3 is required,as applicable. The proposed zoning and uses are generally consistent with the associated FLUM designations as discussed above in Section IV. C. Preliminary Plat(PP): The proposed preliminary plat consists of 8 building lots &6 common lots on I I5.26-acres of land in the R-15, C-C, H-E and M-E zoning districts for Vanguard Village subdivision. The subdivision is proposed to develop in four(4 5) final plat phases as shown on the revised phasing plan in Section VI.0 1. The first phase of the multi-family development on the north end of the site zoned R-15 is proposed to develop first with the M-E second,the second phase of the multi-. family development third, the H-E thiM fourth and the C-C zoned area last. The Applicant requests they are allowed to apply for building permits in the multi-family portion of the development prior to recordation of the final plat. The following condition is proposed, "Prior to applying for building permits, the following minimum items shall be completed: street signs are to be in place,the installation of sanitary sewer and water systems(with the water system being fully activated), a compacted road base capable of Page 11 Page 108 Item#8. supporting an 80,000 lb.fire truck shall be approved by design engineer,with written confirmation of such approval submitted to the Meridian Building Department." Staff is not in favor of allowing a Certificate of Zoning Compliance&Design-Review applications to be submitted and building permits issued prior to recordation of the final plat as the necessary infrastructure for development, including roads,should be in place first and lots established for development. Therefore, Staff is not supportive of the request. The Applicant may submit a design review application(s)to finalize building design prior to recordation of the final plat. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There are no existing structures remaining on this site. Dimensional Standards: Development of the proposed lots is required to comply with the dimensional standards of the R- 15 zoning district in UDC Table 11-2A-7 and the C-C,M-E and H-E zoning districts in UDC Table 11-2B-3, as applicable. A minimum building setback of 10-feet is required in the multi- family portion of the development unless a greater setback is otherwise required,per UDC 1 1-4- 3-27B.1. Separation between buildings should comply with Building code. A reduced building setback from 20-to 14-feet is requested for the multi-family structures proposed along Sunset Point Way and Coral Reef. However, a recent code amendment(ZOA- 2021-0003)allows a reduction of the collector street setback to be granted for homes that front on a collector street when on-street and required off-street parking is provided(UDC Table 11-2A- 7); the required 20-foot landscape buffer easement is measured from back of curb and the dwelling setback shall not be less than 10-feet from the back of sidewalk along the collector street. Staff recommends the street sections for Sunset Point Way and Coral Reef are constructed consistent with Street Section D in the TMISAP(see pg.3-21),which requires 11-foot travel lanes, 6-foot bike lanes,8-foot parallel parking,8-foot parkways and 6-foot wide detached sidewalks.The 20-foot wide street buffer may be placed in an easement rather than a common lot in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.2a. The building setback must be at least 10-feet from the back of sidewalk,which achieves the ultimate setback desired. This accomplishes the street-oriented design desired in urban environments for a more walkable neighborhood and creates a more consistent edge to the public space in accord with the TMISAP. Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards (UDC 11. 6C-3): Development of the subdivision is required to comply with the subdivision design and improvement standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3. The proposed subdivision appears to comply with these standards. Access(UDC 11-3A-31 Access is proposed to be provided from the northern boundary of the site from W. Franklin Rd. via S. Sunset Point Way and S. Baraya Way and from the east from S. Ten Mile Rd. via the extension of Vanguard Way. Coral Reef Way, Sunset Point Way,Umbria Hills and Vanguard Way are all designed as collector streets in accord with the Master Street Map and the Transportation System Map in the TMISAP. Stub streets are proposed to adjacent properties for future extension. Streets: Sunset Point Way and Coral Reef Way should be constructed in accord with Street Section D (residential collector street) in the TMISAP,which requires (2) 11-foot travel lanes, 6- foot bike lanes, 8-foot parallel parking, 8-foot parkways and minimum 6-foot wide detached Page 12 Page 109 Item#8. sidewalks(see pg. 3-21 and 3-23). Streetlights should be placed in the dry utilities' corridor on either side of the street. The plat should be revised consistent with Street Section D. Vanguard Way and Umbria Hills should be constructed in accord with Street Section C(major collector street) in the TMISAP,which requires(2) 11-foot travel lanes, 6-foot bike lanes, 8-foot parkways with streetlights at a pedestrian scale and minimum 6-foot wide detached sidewalks (see pg. 3-20, 3-22, 3-23). The Applicant proposes a modification of the street section with(3) 11-foot travel lanes,on-street parking between the Williams pipeline and the eastern boundary of the site, 8-foot wide parkways and 10-foot wide detached sidewalks/pathways in lieu of bike lanes,which is required by ACHD. Staff is supportive of this change. All streets should be constructed as complete streets as defined in the TMISAP (see pg. 3-19 & 3- 20). Pathways(UDC 11-3A-8): Ten(10) foot wide multi-use pathways are proposed on the site in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. One segment follows the Williams pipeline easement diagonally across this site; another segment runs along the southern boundary within the street buffer along 1-84. The Park's Dept. has requested a pathway connection be provided between the Purdam Drain pathway and the pathway within the pipeline easement(see Section VIII.G). A 14-foot wide public use easement for all multi-use pathways shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to submittal for City Engineer signature on the final plat(s).If the pathway will be located entirely within the right-of-way, a public pedestrian easement is not needed. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3. A-1 7: The UDC requires minimum 5-foot wide sidewalks to be provided adjacent to all streets with detached sidewalks along collector streets and attached or detached sidewalks along local streets. However, the guidelines in the TMISAP for the collector street sections(i.e. C and D)depict 6-foot wide sidewalks,which should be provided within the development at a minimum. Sidewalks,walkways and pathways should include dedicated crosswalks at the intersection with all streets within commercial activity centers with changes in color, markings, materials,texture and/or surface to distinguish them from the surrounding pavement as set forth in the TMISAP(see pg.3-28, Crosswalks). Pedestrian Circulation: A pedestrian circulation plan is included in Section VII.C.3 that depicts all sidewalks and pedestrian pathways planned throughout the site in accord with the TMISAP for mixed use areas. Parkways(UDC 11-3A-1 7: Parkways are recommended along all streets within the development in accord with the TMISAP, planted with street trees and landscaping per the standards in UDC 11-3B-7C. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): Street buffers are required to be provided as set forth in UDC Table 11-2A-7. A minimum 10-foot wide street buffer is required along all local streets (i.e. Vantage Point Way, Vanguard Trail) in commercial districts. A 20-foot wide street buffer is required along all collector streets (i.e. Vanguard Way,Umbria Hills, Coral Reef Way and Sunset Point Way)—the buffer may be placed in an easement rather than a common lot in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.2a; the building setback must be at least 10-feet from the back of sidewalk in the R-15 district as set forth in UDC Table 11-2A-7. A minimum 50-foot wide street buffer is required along I-84, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C.3,which requires a variety of trees,shrubs,lawn or other vegetative groundcover(see updated code for specifics). A 20-foot wide street buffer, instead of a 10-foot wide buffer,is required along Umbria Hills, a collector street. One (1) Page 13 Page 110 Item#8. additional tree should be added within the street buffer along Umbria Hills (east) per the minimum standard. Landscaping is required within parkways per the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17 and 11-3B- 7C. Class II trees shall be provided in parkways in accord with UDC 11-3A-17E; Class III trees may be considered if the parkways are widened to 10 feet—revise the landscape plan accordingly. Landscaping is required along all pathways per the standards in UDC.II-3B-12C. A 5' wide landscape strip is required on both sides of the pathway planted with a mix of trees, shrubs, lawn and/or other vegetative ground cover. If trees are not allowed within the pipeline easement, an additional 5-feet should be added to the common area outside of the easement to allow for trees; or, alternative compliance may be requested to the planting requirement. Mitigation is required for all existing trees 4"caliper or greater that are removed from the site in accord with the standards in UDC 11-3B-1OC.5. Mitigation calculations are depicted on the landscape plan in accord with UDC standards(i.e. 185 trees at 2.5 caliper inches each for a total of 462.5 caliper inches). The location of mitigation trees shall be depicted on a revised landscape plan submitted with the final plat application. Storm Drainage: An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction is required to follow Best Management Practices as adopted by the City. The Applicant submitted a Geotechnical Evaluation for the subdivision. Pressure Irrigation (UDC 11-3A-15): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided for each and every lot in the subdivision as required in UDC 11-3A-15. Utilities(UDC 11-3A-21): Utilities are required to be provided to the subdivision as required in UDC 11-3A-21. Waterways(UDC I1-3A-m- The Marvin Lateral runs along the west boundary of the site and the Purdam Drain crosses near the northeast corner of the site. If an easement for either of these waterways lies on this site, the easement(s)shall be clearly depicted on the plat.All waterways on this site shall be piped as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6B unless otherwise waived by City Council. Williams Pipeline: The Williams pipeline crosses this site diagonally within a 75-foot wide easement(Inst.#390283,#8018289,#8103052,and#8048122). Development within the easement should comply with the Williams Developers' Handbook. Fencing(UDC I1-3A-6 and ll. 3A-7): All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. No fencing is proposed on the landscape plan. D. Conditional Use Permit(CUP): A Conditional Use Permit is proposed for a multi-family development(i.e. Vanguard Crossing) consisting of 552 dwelling units with a mix of 3-story apartments and 2-story flats and townhome-style buildings ranging from 758 to 1,693 square feet(s.f.) on 40.33-acres of land in the R-15 zoning district. A 9,368 square foot single-story clubhouse is proposed with amenities along with two(2)other amenity buildings. Page 14 Page 111 Item#8. Nine(9) garden-style apartment buildings containing a total of 216 units and 51 flats and townhome-style buildings are proposed containing a total of 336 units with a mix of 1-, 2-and 3- bedroom units. See site plan and associated exhibits in Section VILD. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3): The proposed use is subject to the following standards: (Staffs analysis/c:omments in italic text) 11-4-3-27: MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT: Site Design: 1. Buildings shall provide a minimum setback of ten feet(10')unless a greater setback is otherwise required by this title and/or title 10 of this Code.Building setbacks shall take into account windows,entrances,porches and patios,and how they impact adjacent properties.As noted above in Section V..C, if the required street buffers along the collector streets are placed in easements rather than common lots, setbacks can be reduced to 10-feet measured from back of sidewalk with streets constructed per Street Section D in the TMISAP. 2. All on-site service areas, outdoor storage areas, waste storage, disposal facilities, and transformer and utility vaults shall be located in an area not visible from a public street, or shall be fully screened from view from a public street. The plans submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application should demonstrate compliance with this standard. 3. A minimum of eighty(80)square feet of private,usable open space shall be provided for each unit.This requirement can be satisfied through porches,patios,decks,and/or enclosed yards. Landscaping,entryway and other access ways shall not count toward this requirement. In circumstances where strict adherence to such standard would create inconsistency with the purpose statements of this section, the Director may consider an alternative design proposal through the alternative compliance provisions as set forth in section 11-5B-5 of this title. The floor plans all depict at least 80 sf of private usable open space (i.e.patios or balconies)for each unit except for Buildings 3, 5 and 6— Unit C's—the Applicant states these units will all have 84 sf.patios on-grade. Floor plans for each unit should be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application that demonstrate compliance with this standard. 4. For the purposes of this section,vehicular circulation areas,parking areas,and private usable open space shall not be considered common open space. These areas were not included in the common open space calculations for the site (see common open space exhibit in Section VII.D.S). 5. No recreational vehicles,snowmobiles,boats or other personal recreation vehicles shall be stored on the site unless provided for in a separate, designated and screened area. The Applicant should comply with this requirement. 6. The parking shall meet the requirements set forth in chapter 3, "Regulations Applying to All Districts", of this title. The proposed parking meets and exceeds UDC standards (see parking analysis below). 7. Developments with twenty(20)units or more shall provide the following: a. A property management office. b. A maintenance storage area. Page 15 Page 112 Item#8. c. A central mailbox location, including provisions for parcel mail, that provide safe pedestrian and/or vehicular access. d. A directory and map of the development at an entrance or convenient location for those entering the development. (Ord. 18-1773,4-24-2018) A leasing office, storage area, and a mail&parcel center are depicted on the clubhouse floor plan. The location of the directory and map of the development shall be noted on the site plan submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. C. Common Open Space Design Requirements: 1. The total baseline land area of all qualified common open space shall equal or exceed ten (10)percent of the gross land area for multi-family developments of five (5) acres or more.Based 40.33 acres of land, a minimum of 4.03 acres of common open space should be provided. A total of 8.99 acres is proposed in accord with this standard. 2. All common open space shall meet the following standards: a. The development plan shall demonstrate that the open space has been integrated into the development as a priority and not for the use of land after all other elements of the development have been designed. Open space areas that has been given priority in the development design have: (1) Direct pedestrian access; (2) High visibility; (3) Comply with Crime Prevention through Environmental Design(CTED) standards; and (4) Support a range of leisure and play activities and uses. Irregular shaped, disconnected or isolated open spaces shall not meet this standard. Although there are some irregular shaped areas, they are all directly accessible by pedestrians with high visibility; the majority of the areas are in compliance with these standards and the overall common open space is twice that required. b. Open space shall be accessible and well connected throughout the development. This quality can be shown with open spaces that are centrally located within the development,accessible by pathway and visually accessible along collector streets or as a terminal view from a street.Proposed open space meets this standard. c. The open space promotes the health and well-being of its residents. Open space shall support active and passive uses for recreation,social gathering and relaxation to serve the development.Proposed open space meets this standard. 3. All multi-family projects over twenty(20)units shall provide at least one (1) common grassy area integrated into the site design allowing for general activities by all ages. This area may be included in the minimum required open space total. Projects that provide safe access to adjacent public parks or parks under a common HOA,without crossing an arterial roadway,are exempt from this standard. a. Minimum size of common grassy area shall be at least five thousand(5,000)square feet in area.This area shall increase proportionately as the number of units increase and shall be commensurate to the size of the multi-family development as determined by the decision-making body. Where this area cannot be increased due to site constraints, it may be included elsewhere in the development. Several common Page 16 Page 113 Item#8. grassy areas are proposed in accord with this standard, which Staff believes is proportionate for the proposed development. b. Alternative compliance is available for these standards, if a project has a unique targeted demographic; utilizes other place-making design elements in Old-Town or mixed-use future land use designations with collectively integrated and shared open space areas.Alternative compliance is not needed; the project meets the required standards. 4. In addition to the baseline open space requirement, a minimum area of outdoor common open space shall be provided as follows: a. One hundred fifty(150)square feet for each unit containing five hundred(500)or less square feet of living area.All units contain more than 500 square feet of living area. b. Two hundred fifty (250) square feet for each unit containing more than five hundred (500)square feet and up to one thousand two hundred(1,200) square feet of living area. 352 units contain between 500 and 1,200 square feet of living area. c. Three hundred fifty(350) square feet for each unit containing more than one thousand two hundred(1,200) square feet of living area. 104 units exceed 1,200 square feet of living area. A total of 151,000 sf. (or 3.47 acres) of outdoor common open space is required to be provided per this standard and a minimum of 4.03 acres is required to be provided per the standard listed above in 11-4-3-27C.]for a total of 7.5 acres overall. A total of 391,590 sf. (or 8.99 acres) is proposed in excess of the minimum requirement as shown on the exhibit in Section VII.D.5. 5. Common open space shall be not less than four hundred(400)square feet in area,and shall have a minimum length and width dimension of twenty(20)feet.All of the common open space areas depicted on the open space exhibit in Section VII.F meet this requirement. 6. In phased developments,common open space shall be provided in each phase of the development consistent with the requirements for the size and number of dwelling units. This project is proposed to develop in two phases; common open space is proposed in each phase in accord with UDC standards for the size and number of dwelling units. 7. Unless otherwise approved through the conditional use process,common open space areas shall not be adjacent to collector or arterial streets unless separated from the street by a berm or constructed barrier at least four(4) feet in height, with breaks in the berm or barrier to allow for pedestrian access. The common open space exhibit in Section VII.F includes common open space along collector streets; however, the minimum standards for open space are met internal to the development. A berm or a constructed barrier at least 4 feet in height with breaks in the berm:or barrier to allow for pedestrian access should be provided within the collector street buffer along Vanguard Way. D. Site Development Amenities: 1. All multi-family developments shall provide for quality of life,open space and recreation amenities to meet the particular needs of the residents as follows: a. Quality of life: (1) Clubhouse. Page 17 Page 114 Item#8. (2) Fitness facilities. (3) Enclosed bike storage. (4) Public art such as a statue. (5) Dog park with waste station. (6) Commercial outdoor kitchen. (7) Fitness course. (8) Enclosed storage. b. Open space: (1) Community garden. (2) Ponds or water features. (3) Plaza. (4) Picnic area including tables,benches, landscaping and a structure for shade. c. Recreation: (1) Pool. (2) Walking trails. (3) Children's play structures. (4) Sports courts. d. Multi-modal amenity standards. (1) Bicycle repair station. (2) Park and ride lot. (3) Sheltered transit stop. (4) Charging stations for electric vehicles. 2. The number of amenities shall depend on the size of multi-family development as follows: a. For multi-family developments with less than twenty(20)units,two(2)amenities shall be provided from two(2) separate categories. b. For multi-family development between twenty(20) and seventy-five(75)units,three (3)amenities shall be provided, with one from each category. c. For multi-family development with seventy-five(75)units or more, four(4) amenities shall be provided, with at least one from each category. d. For multi-family developments with more than one hundred(100)units,the decision- making body shall require additional amenities commensurate to the size of the proposed development. Based on 552-units, a minimum of 4 amenities are required. Amenities are proposed as follows: a clubhouse with a swimmingpool, hot tub and cabanas; an outdoor kitchen and dining area;fitness lounge, lawn games and firepit lounge;pickleball court; children's play area; dog parks; a smaller swimming pool,picnic shelter and fire pit lounge; art; pedestrian walkways; 10 foot wide sidewalks along the collector street(Vanguard); and Page 18 Page 115 Item#8. an amenity area with a BBQ lounge(see Exhibit 6 in Section VLD below). Amenities are provided from all of the required categories. 3. The decision-making body shall be authorized to consider other improvements in addition to those provided under this subsection D,provided that these improvements provide a similar level of amenity. (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) E. Landscaping Requirements: 1. Development shall meet the minimum landscaping requirements in accord with chapter 3, "Regulations Applying to All Districts", of this title. 2. All street facing elevations shall have landscaping along their foundation. The foundation landscaping shall meet the following minimum standards: a. The landscaped area shall be at least three feet(Y)wide. b. For every three(3) linear feet of foundation, an evergreen shrub having a minimum mature height of twenty-four inches (24") shall be planted. c. Ground cover plants shall be planted in the remainder of the landscaped area. The landscape plan submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application should depict landscaping on all street facing elevations in accord with these standards. F. Maintenance and Ownership Responsibilities: All multi-family developments shall record legally binding documents that state the maintenance and ownership responsibilities for the management of the development, including,but not limited to, structures,parking, common areas, and other development features. The Applicant shall comply with this requirement. Landscaping(UDC I1-3B): Street buffer landscaping is required to be provided with the subdivision improvements as noted above in Section V.B. Landscaping is required to be provided along all pathways per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C,which requires a minimum 5-foot wide landscape strip along each side of the pathway planted with a mix of trees, shrubs,lawn, and/or other vegetative ground cover; a minimum of one(1)tree per 100 linear feet of pathway is required. Parking lot landscaping is required to be provided per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B- 8C. Staff recommends a minimum of one(1)tree be provided for every 8,000 square feet of common open space. Parking: Off-street vehicle parking is required for the proposed multi-family dwellings as set forth in UDC Table 11-3C-6. Based on 222 1-bedroom units and 330 2- and 3-bedroom units, a minimum of 993 off-street spaces are required with 552 of those being in a covered carport or garage. Off-street parking is required for the clubhouse and amenity building as set forth in UDC 11-3C-6B.1 for non-residential uses; based on 9,368 s.f for the clubhouse and 1,800 s.f. for each of the amenity buildings, a minimum of 26 spaces are required. Between the residential units, clubhouse and two amenity buildings, a minimum of 1,019 off- street parking spaces are required with 552 of those being in a covered carport or garage. A total of 1,054 off-street parking spaces are proposed with 665 of those being covered spaces (470 garages/195 carports)in excess of UDC standards. Based on 1,054 parking spaces proposed, a minimum of 42 bicycle parking spaces are required to be provided; a total of 48 spaces are Page 19 Page 116 Item#8. proposed. Bicycle parking facilities should comply with the standards in UDC 11-3C-5C. Bike racks should be provided in central locations for each building and for the clubhouse. The Applicant's narrative states an additional 94 off-site on-street parking spaces will be provided for guests,which totals 129 additional spaced beyond those required. However,ACHD is requesting some turn lanes be provided which will reduce this number. Private Streets: The Fire Dept. has requested private streets are provided for addressing purposes of the multi-family units. All private streets should comply with the standards listed in UDC I I- 3F-4. The Applicant shall submit a private street application concurrent with the final plat application. Fencing: No fencing is depicted on the landscape plan for this development. All fencing should comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7 if proposed. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual(ASM) I TMISAP Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed apartment, flat and townhome- style multi-family and clubhouse buildings as shown in Section VII.D.7. Updated Rbuilding materials consist of vertical and horizontal hardie plank siding in 1jgLgray;and green and wood colors; stucco in dark gray and off-white colors; and vertical western red cedar siding with cedar posts and beams and asphalt shingles. Per the TMISAP for MHDR designated areas,the design of residential buildings should incorporate street-oriented and human-scale design and be located as close to the property line as possible to create a consistent edge to the public space and make streets more friendly and walkable.The closest the structures are allowed to be per UDC Table 11-2A-7 is 10-feet from the back of sidewalk as proposed in the cross-section below with the collector street buffer placed in an easement. e t TYPICAL CR055 SECTION r) Structures should incorporate traditional neighborhood design.Front porches with parking behind the buildings are desired. Streetscapes with landscaped parkways with trees between curbs and sidewalks, street furniture and view corridors are key.Primary facades should include an entry into the building; entries should be located so as to provide direct access from adjacent public spaces, streets and activity areas as proposed. Where primary facades face a designated public space and another faces a parking area designed to serve that structure such as proposed,both facades should be designed and detailed as primary facades and both should have prominent usable entries. The space between a building facade and the adjacent sidewalk should be landscaped with a combination of lawns,groundcover, shrubs and trees. Mostly attached low-rise buildings of 1- 3 stories are recommended as proposed. 4"dings skeoldf designed-Witk 4eafl!-delineated base6;-W4ies-and tees f see-pg-d 9). Page 20 Page 117 Item#8. lAwdseaped-buffers-Should y3lvWd• eeu the proposed-developme t andI#e-existing single-€muily-development to the-ner-tlr. Ground floor elevations should be 18 to 24 inches above sidewalk grade with individual units opening directly onto adjacent rights-of-way with stoop frontage. Pitched roofs should be symmetrical hips or gables with a pitch between 4:12 and 12:12 and have an overhang of at least 12 inches. Public art in a high quality of design should also be provided in shared spaces and incorporated into the design of streetscapes. The proposed conceptual elevations are not approved. Final design must comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual(ASM) and the design guidelines in the TMISAP for the MHDR designation (see the matrix for Application of the Design Elements on pg.3-49).A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted for approval of the site and building design prior to submittal of building permit applications.Note:Any variations from the design standards in the ASM should be requested through a design standard exception as detailed in the ASM with the Design Review application. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the requested DA modification,rezone,preliminary plat and conditional use permit per the provisions noted in Section VIII,per the Findings in Section IX. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on March 17, 2022. At the public hearing, the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subiect RZ, PP and CUP requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing: a. In favor:JoAnn Butler,Deb Nelson,Garret Scott,T.J. Winger b. In opposition: None C. Commenting: None d. Written testimony: JoAnn Butler, Applicant's Representative L. Staff presenting application: Sonva Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. The Applicant requests a couple of alternatives to the design guidelines in the TMISAP pertaining to roof pitches and front stoops in the multi-family portion of the development. The plan calls for roof pitches ranging from 4:12 to 12:12; the Applicant requests the allowance of a lower pitch for the community clubhouse amenity buildings of 2:12 and for the townhome garages of 3:12 to allow larger windows with lower sills at the second level. Front stoops are desired in the Plan for buildings that face public streets of 18"to 24"above grade; due to concerns pertaining to compliance with ADA requirements,the Applicant proposes patios instead with railings that frames off the entrances that are covered by the above balconies. b. In favor of the roof pitches and front porches proposed in lieu of stoops for sense of place within the community&opinion that they meet the intent of the guidelines.—TJ Winger(part of the architecture team for this proiect). 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. The Applicant's request for lower roof pitches for certain structures; and for front stoops to not be required per the design guidelines in the Plan; b. Preference for more commercial to develop first rather than residential to create more iobs 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: Page 21 Page 118 Item#8. a. The Commission was supportive of the Applicant's request for lower roof pitches in the multi-family portion of the development (i.e. 2:12 on amenity buildings and 3:12 on townhome garages)and for the design guideline pertaining to front stoops to not be required. 5. Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: a. If Council agrees with the Applicant's request for lower roof pitches for certain buildings and for covered front patios to be provided instead of stoops, it should be memorialized in the DA. C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on April 19,2022. At the public hearing,the Council moved to approve the subject MDA,RZ,PP and CUP requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: JoAnn Butler, Deb Nelson, Garret Scott, T.J. Winger b. In opposition: None C. Commenting:None d. Written testimony:None e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony, a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Desire for xeriscape landscaping to be provided around commercial buildings in areas where landscaping isn't required per UDC standards; b. The lower roof pitches and front patios instead of stoops reguested by the Applicant: 4. City Council change(s) to Commission recommendation; a. City Council approved the Applicant's request for lower roof pitches for certain buildings as specified and front patios instead of elevated stoops in the multi-family portion of the development. Page 22 Page 119 Item#8. VII. EXHIBITS A. Development Agreement(DA) Modification 1. Existing DA provisions(Planning Dept. only): 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1. Developer/Owner shall develop the Property in accordance with conditions identified in Exhibit B of the staff report for the hearing date of December 8, 2009,which Exhibit B of the staff report is a portion of Exhibit B attached to this Agreement. EXHIBIT B: AGENCY& DEPARTMENT COMMENTS On September 24, 2009, Planning Staff held an agency comments meeting. The agencies and departments present include: Meridian Fire Department,Meridian Public Works Department, Meridian Parks Department,and Sanitary Service Company. Staff has included all comments and recommended actions in the attached Exhibit B. 1. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1.1 The legal description and exhibit map for the area contained in the proposed annexation submitted with the application (stamped on August 26, 2009, by Michael Marks, PLS) shows the property within the existing corporate boundary of the City of Meridian (see Exhibit C). 1.2 A Development Agreement(DA)will be required as part of the annexation of this property. Prior to the annexation ordinance approval,a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. The Applicant shall contact the City Attorney's Office within one year of Council approval to initiate this process. Currently,a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the applicant to the City Attorney's office prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. An encroachment permit is required for any improvements proposed within the pipeline easement. A copy of the executed encroachment agreement shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of any Certificate of Zoning Compliance for this site. Uses such as daycares, schools, hospitals, assisted living facilities, etc. where occupants are not able to leave the area quickly in case of an emergency, are discouraged in the vicinity of the pipeline. b. Street buffer landscaping, internal parking lot landscaping, landscape buffers to adjoining residential uses, and mitigation for existing trees 4-inch caliper and larger that are removed from the site,will be required with development of this site and shall be installed in accordance with City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of development. c. Development of this site shall be consistent with the concept site plan shown in Exhibit A.2 and the concept pictures shown in Exhibit A.3. Further, future development shall be consistent with the vision of the Ten Mile Specific Area Plan, the Design Manual,and City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of development. Page 23 Page 120 Item#8. d. Development in the R-40 district shall be consistent with the overall density and development standards contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan for Medium High Density Residential(MHDR)designated areas. e. Development in the C-C district shall be consistent with the development standards contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan for Mixed Use Commercial (MUC)designated areas. Uses within the C-C district shall be comprised of a mix of uses(i.e. office,retail,recreational, employment, and other uses, including residential uses)as defined in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan. f. A 10-foot wide segment(s)of the City's multi-use regional pathway system shall be constructed on the site in accordance with the Master Pathways Plan in the general locations noted on the plan included in Exhibit A.4; exact location of the pathways shall be determined by the Planning Department and Parks Department at the time of development. Said pathway shall be primarily located within the pipeline easement and provide connectivity to the planned pathway in Baraya Subdivision at the northwest corner of the site. Pathway stubs shall be provided at the west boundary further to the south and to the east boundary on the north end of the site for connectivity with future segments of the pathway. g. The applicant shall submit a Certificate of Zoning Compliance application to the Planning Department for approval of all future uses on the site to ensure compliance with the Unified Development Code, Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan, Comprehensive Plan,Design Manual,and provisions of the development agreement contained herein,prior to issuance of building permits for any structure(s)within this site. Link to complete Development Agreement(Inst. #110115738): https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=76898&dbid=O&repo=Meridian City Page 24 Page 121 Item#8. 2. Existing Approved Conceptual Development Plan& Elevations: PARCEL R-1 _ PARCEL O-S _ PARCEL M-6 \ L-' -- _, _ ter•'-•'-c,_ w �= PARCEL M-1 _�.ia 0.1 PARCELM. '•e.— � �i.> Ica .PARCELO.2 _ T 3 PARCEL M-2&M _• :. � _ PARCEL O 3 •- — PARK RESTAURANTA PARCEL01 PARCEL M-i PARKRE&TAURANT5 PARCEL 0-5 _ PARK RESTAURANT °0'�"" �•� PARCEL M-S PARK RESTAURANT D PARCEL D•6 cstim� W L COUTIOUE RETAIL PARCtiC'0'7 3f 2 T , --- II ' - - Lam -w- 4 F•� 4Si5 a-„a AhO wA Page 25 Page 122 Item#8. 3. Proposed Conceptual Development Plan % It lb rM 41 *a �• IbI�i� •i , - 1-84 Page 26 Page 123 4. Proposed Conceptual Building Elevations/Design I i'Vi Examples of Mixed Use Cominercial./Retail in the C-C Zone MIL— �..• `.' Ike PRODUCT R D CONCEPT Examplesof Vertically Integrated Residential •g' 27 Item#8. l 4 Ilk a WE PRODUCT CONCEPT STUDY Examples of Mixed Employment Design IdL AL WE PRODUCT CONCEPT STUDY Examples of High Density Employment Design Page 28 Page 125 Item#8. B. Rezone—Legal Descriptions & Exhibit Maps ,005 � I � F6 � r ! e — — ® is 9 J m Z Z N ! zaarrG exrieir M 3 L3.U0 Page 29 Page 126 Item#8. EaT-O ENGINEERS Project No: 190580 Date:December 15,2021 Page IofI MERIDIAN 118 H-E ZONING A parcel of land located in portions of the NE1/4 of the SW1/4,and the NW1/4 of the 5E1/4,of Section 15,Township 3 North, Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Center East 1/16 Corner of said Section,from which the Center 1/4 Corner of said Section bears N.89°14'39"W., 1321.43 feet;thence along the east boundary of said NW1/4 of the SE1/4, A) S.00"33'33"W.,419.50 feet:thence, B) S.88020'35"W.,422.37 feet;thence, C) S.060-13'49"W.,104.18 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.thence continuing, 1) 5.06013'49"W.,46.04 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve;thence, 2) Southwesterly along said curve to the right,having a radius of 125.00 feet,an arc length of 96.48 feet,through a central angle of 44°13'28"and a long chord which bears S.28'20'33"W., 94.11 feet;thence tangent from said curve, 3) S.50°27'17"W.,698.92 feet;thence, 4) N.W032'45"W.,589.58 feet;thence, 5) N.66906'D5"E.,97.09 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve;thence, 6) Northeasterly along said curve to the right,having a radius of 1000.D0 feet,an arc length of 430.30 feet,through a central angle of 24139'16"and a long chord which bears N.78'25'43"E.,426.99 feet:thence tangent from said curve, 7) S.89014'39"E.,456.97 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING:7.06 acres,more or less. 'Bearings and distances are based on the record zoning descriptions included in the Development Agreement recorded as Instrument No. 110115738,Official Records of Ada County, Idaho. P� IL s 13765 a• I Ll c4IZ f o !rE 0 F 10' p 332 N.Broaamore Way N.irn[LL ID 83687 i P 208 442 6300 to engineers_com 0.M Page 30 Page 127 Item#8. ©2021 T-OENGINEER$.THIS INSTRUMENT ISTHCPROPERTYOFT-OENGINEERS.AWREPRODUCTION,REUSEORMODIFICAVOINOFTHISINSTRUMENTORITSCONTENTSWTHOUTSPECPICVIRITT-eNPERMISSIONOFT-0ENGINEERSISSTRICTLYPROHOTEI EXHIBIT SKETCH- H-E ZONING LOCATED IN PORTIONS OF THE NE14 OF THE SW114 AND THE NVV111 OF THE SE114 OF SECTION 15,TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH.RANGE 1 WEST BOISE MERIDIAN.CITY OF MERIDIAN.ADA COUNTY,IDAHO 2021 LINE TABLE CW1116— N89'14'51"W C114 —f N09"1BASI OF HEARINGS .�� N89'14'39"W 1321.43' CE1116 LINE BEARING DISTANCE 1322,76' --- 0 Ll SO6'13'49'W 104.18' a a L2 S06'13'49"W 46.04' 3 (C-C) L3 N66'06'05"E 97.09' I� IM 0 O LEGEND POINT OF 513_8'20'35"W 422.37' BEGINNING _ S89-14'39"E - -- New ZONE i90uw0ARY �, --"'° —- 456.97 - EXISTING ZONE BOUNDARY 3 --- SECTION LINE S1215427850 RECORD ANGLE POINT y♦ H-E (C-C) EXISITING ZONING �\ 7.06 AC. /9ti S1215427850 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL No. (H E) rss /1�y16 (N E) 5 NOTES 1. ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON RECORD ZONING DESCRIPTIONS INCLUDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT No.110115738, +VT11i57n71; - OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. g 2. THE PARCEL SHOWN WILL BE RE20NED FROM 0' ISO, 3001 600' C-C TO H-E. LA p _ SCALE:1"W 300' �S CURVE TABLE -� '0 m T-O ENGINEERS CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTALN78-2V4.3-E G CHORD 13765 s 1�t�rz� Cl 125.00' 96.48' 4413'23'W 94.11' l 332 N.BROADMORE WAY C2 1000.00' 430.30' 2a'39'1 426.99' P if OF � A NAMPA,IDAHO83687 HBO Mp>,L� PHONE:(2D8)442.6300 WWW.1U-ENGINEERS.COM E-FILE.1905%V-X3 20NIN0 H-E DATE 12IIP2021 JOB:1415DO Page 31 Page 128 Item#8. WWI T O ENGINEERS Project No: 190580 Date:December 15,2021 Page 1 of 2 MERIDIAN 118 M-E ZONING A parcel of land located in portions of the NE1/4 of the SW1/4 and the NW1/4 of the SE1/4,of Section 15,Township 3 North, Range 1 West.Boise Meridian.City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Center 1/4 Corner of said Section 15,from which the Center East 1/16 Corner of said Section bears S.89°14'39"E., a distance of 1321.43 feet;thence, along the north line of said NE1/4 of the SWl/4, A) N.89014'51"W.,291.63 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.;thence, 1) 5.39031'08"E.,747.95 feet to the beginning of non-tangent curve;thence, 2) Southwesterly along said curve to the left, having a radius of 1000.00 feet,an arc length of 185.66 feet,through a central angle of 10°39'16"and a long chord which bears S.71125'13"W., 185.4C feet;thence tangent from said curve, 3) S.66106'05"W.,231.67 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve;thence, 4) Southwesterly along said curve to the right,having a radius of 750.00 feet,an arc length of 322.73 feet, through a central angle of 24039'16"and a long chord which bears S.78025'43"W_, 320.24 feet;thence tangent from said curve, 5) N.89014'39"W., 51.86 feet;thence, 6) S_00°45'21"W.,393.83 feet to the north right-of-way of Interstate Highway 84;thence along said right-of-way, 7) N.81'24'57"W.,352.28 feet;thence, 8) N.85023'09"W.,21.65 feet;thence departing said north right-of-way, 9) N.09028'05"E.,86.37 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve,thence, 10)Northeasterly along said curve to the right, having a radius of 150.00 feet,an arc length of 107.30 feet, through a central angle of 40°59'02"and a long chord which bears N.29157'36"E., 105.02 feet;thence tangent from said curve, 1 332 N. Broadnore Way Nampa_ID 83687 P:208 442 6300 to rnginee s ram Page 32 Page 129 Item#8. T O ENGINEERS Project No: 190580 Date: December 15, 2021 Page 2 of 2 11)N.50027'07"E.. 357.09 feet;thence, 12)N,39°32'45"W., 918.69 feet to beginning of a tangent curve;thence, 13)Northwesterly a ong said curve to the right,having a radius of 150.00 feet,an arc length of 39.04 feet,through a central angle of 14°54'48"and a long chord which bears N.32°05'21°W., 38.93 feet to the north boundary of said NE1/4 of the SW1/4,from which point the Center West 1/16 Corner of said Section bears N.89014'51"W.,a distance of 115.16 feet;thence, 14)5.89014'51"E.,915.97 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING:17.38 acres, more or less. 'Bearings and distances are based on the record zoning descriptions included in the Development Agreement recorded as Instrument No. 110115738,Official Records of Ada County, Idaho. �►G 13765 OF 0'MA- 2 332 N-Broadmore Way ID 83687 R 208 4-42 6309 to eng x ers eom Page 33 Page 130 Item#8. ©2021 T•0 ENGINEERS.TH S I145TRILMENTIS THE PROPERTY OF T 0 ENGINEERS.ANY REPRODUCTION,REUSE OR MODIFICATION OF TNIS INSTRUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS 1MTH OUT SPEC FIC WRITTEN PERMISSION OF T•0 ENGINEERS IS STRICTLY PRONBITEI EXHIBIT SKETCH-M-E ZONING LOCATED IN PORTIONS OF THE NEIA OF THE SW114 AND THE NW 1/Z OF THE SEt/4 OF SECTION 15,TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,RANGE 1 WEST BOISE MERIDIAN,CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY,IDAHO 2021 CW1/16 LS S89'14'51"E 915.97' _ N89.14'51'W C114 BASIS OF BEARINGS A 589.14'39"E 13?1.43' _ CEtn6-- 291.63' --- -�---n POINT OF J BEGINNING s 2♦ \O's F 2\ \y D' 150, 300' 500, spy♦ S1 2 1 54278 50 ♦ems' �� (M E) per\ M-E ` SCALE.1'=3D0' s � 17.38 Ac. ♦ (C-C) LEGEND "N yg♦ ♦ k E /P� G� ---- NEW ZONE BOUNDARY EXISTING ZONE BOUNDARY 4 13765 \ A o��°= --''^ \' '-- SECTION LINE r7/����z(�o �h�• I o RECORD ANGLE POINT �JF OF `pr ��� i+1IN (M-E) EXISITING ZONING 00 9�B0 .MA`��l aiilo (NE) S1215427850 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL No. �l IN ---eD 352.28• NOTES L3 N81'2 µ`INTsTA I t__ E 84 1. ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON RECORD ZONING DESCRIPTIONS INCLUDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT LINE TABLE CURVE TABLE RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT No.1 1 011 57 38, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. LINE BEARING DISTANCE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA BEARING CHORD 2 THE PARCEL SHOWN WILL BE REZONED FROM L1 S66-06-05"W 231.67' C1 1000.00' 185.66' 10'38'16" S71'25'13"W 185.40' C-C AND H-E TO M-F. L2 N89-14.39"W 51.86' C2 750.00' 322.73' 24'39'16" S78'25'43"W 3,20.24' L3 N85-23.09"W 21.65' C3 150.00' 107.30' 40'S9'02" N2957'36"E 105.02' m 7-0 ENGINEERS L4 N09-28'05"E 86.37' C4 150.00' 1 39.04' 1 14-54'48" N32-05'21'W 38.93' 332 N.BROADMORE WAY NAMPA,IDAHO83687 L5 N8914'51"w 115.16' PHONE:(20B)442.6300 6V4VW.TO-ENGINEERS.COM E-FILE.19MVAB ZONING M•E DATE.1b1512021 N6:1905N Page 34 Page 131 Item#8. 7.0 ENGINEERS Project No: 190580 Date: December 15,2021 Page 1 of 1 MERIDIAN 118 R-15 ZONING A parcel of land being all of the SE1/4 of the NW1/4,of Section 15,Township 3 North,Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho,being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the Center 1/4 Corner of said Section 15,from which the Center East 1/16 corner of said Section bears S.89'14'39"E.,a distance of 1321.43 feet;thence along the south boundary of said SE1/4 of the NW1/4, 1) N.89"14'51"W. 1322.76 feet to the Center West 1/16 Corner of said Section;thence alone the west boundary of said SE1/4 of the NW1/4, 2) N.00°39'49"E. 1328.76 feet to Northwest 1/16 Corner of said Section,thence along the north boundary of said SE114 of the NW 1/4, 3) S.89015'14"E. 1321.52 feet to the Center North 1/16 Corner of said Section,thence along the east boundary of said SE1/4 of the NW1/4, 4) S.00°36'37"W. 1328.91 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING:40.33 acres,more or less. `Bearings and distances are based on the record zoning descriptions included in the Development Agreement recorded as Instrument No. 110115738,Official Records of Ada County, Idaho. a 765 fl aD OF I'D 9�B MAl1�-1 1 332 N Broanioow Way Nampa.ID B3687 P:208.442.630* o engirxerc,�om Page 35 Page 132 Item#8. Q N21 T-O EN31NEERS THIS INSTROVENT IS THE PROPERTY OF T-O ENGINEERS.ANY REPROOKII0N,REUSE OR MODFICATION OF TH131145TRUMEM OR TS CONTENTS WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION Of T•O ENGINEERS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITEI EXHIBIT SKETCH-R-15 ZONING ALL OF THE SE1/4 OF THE NW114 OF SECTION 15.TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,RANGE 1 WEST BOISE MERIDIAN,CITY OF MiRI01AN,ADA COUNTY,IDAHO 2021 NW1116 S89'15'14"E 1321.52' CNN16 LEGEND �__--'•-__-----__-----__� -- NEW ZONE BOUNDARY 1 1 EXISTING ZONE BOUNDARY SECTION LINE 1 1 o RECORD ANGLE POINT 1 1 (M-F) CALCULATED POINT III S1215244200 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL No. rol \11, S1215244200 N wl R-15 I NOTES �+ 40.33 Ac. 1 n 1. ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE of lto BASED ON RECORD ZONING DESCRIPTIONS =1 (M-E) 1$o INCLUDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 1 I En RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT No.1 1 011 5738, I I OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. 2. THE PARCEL SHOWN WILL BE REZONED FROM R-40, M-E, AND C-C TO R-15. f 1 - 1 CW1116 N89'14'51"W 1322.76' C14 S9G'14'39'E 1321.43' CEV16 At,%. AN 0' 150' 300' 600' 13765 p n T-O ENGINEERS N�(2 I�. 332 N.BROADMORE WAY SCALE:1"=3OC' OF � NAMPA,IDAHO 83687 � y PHONE:(208)442-6300 WWW.TO-ENGINEERS.COM .-FILE.1905WV-XB ZDNING R-a5 DATE 12/02021 JOB 19OW Page 36 Page 133 Item#8. T O ENGINEERS Project No: 190580 Date: December 16, 2021 Page 1 of 1 MERIDIAN 118 C-C ZONING A parcel of land located in a portion of the NW1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 15,Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho,being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at The Center East 1/16 Corner of said Section 15,from which the Center 1/4 Corner of said Section bears N.89°14'39"W., 1321.43 feet;thence,along the east boundary of said NW1/4 of the SE1/4, A) S.00�33'33"W,,419.50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;thence continuing along said east boundary, 1) S.W33'33"W., 121.49 feet;thence leaving said east boundary, 2) N49014'39"W.,432.35 feet;thence, 3) N.06013'49"E., 104.18 feet; thence, 4) N.88°20'35"E.,422.37 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING; 1.10 acres,more or less. 'Bearings and distances are based on the record zoning descriptions included in the Development Agreement recorded as Instrument No. 110115738,Official Records of Ada County, Idaho. � ENS a 13765 o N,,1Zl`Iz'o OF I'D 0'fA i ,132'4 Brnadmore Way Namlo.1D 63687 I''208_e-42.6300 to engineersxom Page 37 Page 134 Item#8. ©2021 TO ENGINEERS.THIS INSTRUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF T-0 ENGNEEFS,ANY REPROOUCT•ON,REUSE OR MODIRCAriON OF THIS iNSTRUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS WITHOUT SPECIFIC ViRITTEN PERMISSION OF TO ENGINEERS IS STRICTLI PROHI8-TEI EXHIBIT SKETCH-C-C ZONING LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE NW114 OF THE SEi14OF SECTION 15,TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,RANGE 1 WEST BOISE MERIDIAN,CITY OF MERIDIAN ADA COUNTY,IDAHO 2021 CW1116�gg14'51"W 1322.76' C1/4 BASIS OF BEARINGS __ ____ NS!'14'39"W 1321.43' -- -- CE1l15 0 N LINE TABL2t LINE BEARING CE �1 L7 S0033'33"W9' n L2 N0613'49'E8' 0' 150' M' wo' g POINT OF l SCALE.1"=300' BEGINNING l N88'20'35"£ 422.37' S121542TSS0 LEGEND 2 c-c (C-C) 1 10 Ac. --�--- NEW ZONE BOUNDARY + N89'14'39'W 432.35' EXISTING ZONE BOUNDARY f ---- SECTION LINE F' (H-E) I I a RECORD ANGLE POINT I (H-E) EXISTING ZONING S1 2 1 54 2 7850 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL No. I NOTES os EN 1. ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON RECORD ZONING DESCRIPTIONS o INCLUDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 13765 p m T-O ENGINEER S RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT No.110115738, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. 0/11Wzv' pt �o� 332 N.BROADMORE WAY 2. THE PARCEL SHOWN WILL BE REZONED FROM �� Of F� NAMPA.IDAHO B3687 H-E TO C-C, 60'Mp1.L PHONE;(208)442-6300 WWW.TD-ENGINEERS.COM E-FILE:19r90*0 ZONING CC DATE:12il&?Q2i J00.19MD Page 38 Page 135 Item#8. C. Preliminary Plat 1. Preliminary Plat&Phasing Plan_(REVISED)(date: 11/17/2021) LLI --- � _ 91EETvux --L ✓ i Af l9ef� SRE MTM ¢ e �- F-j _ 2 5M Yr as .aµFw-oo.-TT —yam co.o I II ,I II !i ® m II _ JL 3 Page 39 Page 136 Item#8. p A y.1 i z al 4-4 .tee. E I$ } p W C1,2 • --- - ruawwwnr _ •� l �gEpp --- x - -_. � I I I I I a�•, I €!I I I 'U J 161I ogN I L „ \ z J ® n h Q « „d -ems,.m -- Page 40 Page 137 Item#8. I fll — ——————— ————————— ag�8 E 0 6 z 7 O Z O a Q 0 C1.4 z O ,�.�..p. .,.,. :J,.✓ O Z CORnI REEFWA RKi wOi� K BBB f W 0 a `s > w 0 < as � � a t w z a uwse=r o�iRr wnvwnr J ®m-� C2.3 Page 41 Page 138 Item#8. vww.-mruvaov�.wixwgQ � f 9i C2.4 Updated: - a MR f o— Page 42 Page 139 Item#8. -d •.��._ GMVEf nIQ 20HE3 � + I M � g s � El a F R-15 t Y L } e {${ W A4E sly I O Q 3 _ L CIE �, !\ => p Page 43 Page 140 Item#8. 2. Landscape Plan (date: 2/13/2022) fl3 ���...,•�'. m VANGUARD WAV..w"•iai+++."` yo S _,.._,..._.mow I�� a��� 1� ❑ i� � 5 j _"•.,:::8._:.stW�`���••m,•W:,� ovExru oEVEwPM-_n__ __ � ,,. R ' o�-•M•'�+ ensue - - SHEET INNEX K F . f > �•� �W•��,��•,-_�� =61TIIKRENlER-OF ENTRI­3 AT MN6UKm WAY AMUMMIA HILLS �• m woauwecuaa.aiorm w�scrrE wcuunaes �� _��� . ; sta a_ ;. 5. : F _ O W _._ J W mal U 2 U L2.00 Page 44 Page 141 Item#8. ®n� GROUNi MATERIAL SCHEDULE 0 \' �r L6.13 L6.14 i it � SYMiiL SCHEDULE L6.11 L6.12 � + s .. �.«. a a ■ � y u f s _. F cb - 2' g L6.01 alu�N' ,iIH 0 p U 0_j � o - "_ OH'HN4 NII'i10- � III�Np�iiiNO `' w L6.03 ulu.l� bHo € w a (� w Q a a � z L6.07 aeww� u > C7 -C M �I n%,N4fi N wAN4� Z Lu Ci' ENO w a 04frripHNHrHp _`I a ®OV ERA�rLavnMc ww I L&O Link to complete plan set: https://weblink-.meridiancity.orzlWebLink/DocView.Rspx?id=252515&dbid=O&repo=Meridian City Page 45 Page 142 Item#8. 3. Circulation Plan-Revised SOMEONE f is ......... rr i 5S ¢ I YIIIInnlnl _ ®tl F7, `r I w a C7 g tea® f dog O NHI��Q1H NHN hllllllhfiy eJHHHukn�l'a Z LU .: ` onnno info � 7 u7 zi ENHNNNIHNHN w gG4y !Il�1AUTEWALS M�8RE G63G'.�_4':M FAIN 4 LB Page 46 Page 143 Item#8. D. Conditional Use Permit 1. Site Plan(dated: 10/6/21) _ -- 5°' Rill - W LI F 7 3 i y z yyyp`� Y `> �� ° aaaxno r'neraarnor rwrou.ao wnv W µ Lo Lu � a era�c•ue' Page 47 Page 144 Item#8. lati,n•,veer r-` LzaL ,.. � !'p?t -. '*'-- "�v-.�.$_� �1+"*'airTn'kr" `\ .i-,u_rrea�_riswca.^---=•-==:.�ecz•�a�u4.cwmo� r._._._._..� ,�• �� _• ••• � � rsym;uF,6Frem�m.cesu. r - / � m � seroiime.,.�M.�uaaessz:aw II 1 rl _ i� S�SltifJJIIIFFFLAit:ronwe w.wunb ( � i w �. � IRY.4'S llFnlim mlFC Il _ en[ nr lin vmc..0 e.r�rn .um om w.r.c r wec nw ian rreerr ¢.a n,v .um�v wumc r 9 421®LLtCIBIIFLLGG CUP FOR LDK PR*J=C7 VANGUARD A7 10 MILE MERIDIAN]WAH19 33642 VANGUAM 311!►FAN � ,sm[:b,%.+�'+w�travi�.cM�nm�ir m��a_,wIW¢w.,�s,a.�vwan,dymmm uautn lameuswyenn Page 48 Page 145 Item#8. 2. Phasing Plan-REVISED e ~ »ay'� ���'a••;T\ter Ph\SEE Ni 10nE5Qo id „i fsf a i r J 5 O a � a zaz _s z 14 -- -- ,M® Page 49 Page 146 Item#8. 3. Parking Calculations-Revised eii)[rxd Ir•n- Part,% m r, rota nan- b3a. rota,. Garage•xunt lbad ►.Aing izi Ak covered covered 2.5 bed 2/.nit covered coaeed d Bred Garden Style 24 1 12 IB 6 12 12 24 12 12 lY C 24 Guiding 3 6 8 2 3 1 2 4 a 4 4' 5 6 BuldirC 4 B a 4 6 2 4 4 a a 4 6 a Building 5 8 ¢ 2 3 1 2 6 12 6 6 7 a Buidinc 6 Q a 0 D 0 0 4 a 4 4 4 4 buldirkg 7 4 Q 2 3 1 2 2 3 2 2' 3 Q Pequired ►rrri•6d PrmMN N•vided "red Non- Required "red Provided no Prv�ed Provided Provided ►HASEi t3r�dinE type w.oFhldgs real uniic Covered Covered G° L ADAStalls like Pahirg ovaed artad.ed dctarAed wrpans envered AlArolk like Pa rW Ga =es garag•i f2r6'irw Garden 6 iJa me 144 e 3 11 66 55 66 88 Q 5 4• 31 a ,3 5 13 134 93 104 ,% 6 3 12 12 32 24 36G wi 10 f56 TOTAL►RASE f 2% 366 37 14 3S )63 474 14 d1 Required ►IOV\1Pd PnT'Idld NrN ded ►HASE3 etidin`[ype p•-oFNdu ra3al unit "red Nun Required GueA Aegl{red Required Provided no amta6ed de her RwMed Prarlded Provided S'Ne Covered Cle red Parki ADAS1a15 Like Par. —ad GarL�es earaelc brporY wed AlaAmlls Garden 3 72 34 72 e 3 7 42 35 42 Q 6 49 36 lie as 6 2 a a 8 7 Q 16 12 16 SE 136 20 39 TOTAL PHASE 3 91 114 151 9 1�5 i 4 Page 50 Page 147 Item#8. 4. Landscape Plan (dated: November 2021) SECTION 05 TREE SPECIES MIX I TREES TOTAL NUMBER OF 1ROROSED TREES 9T1 NUMBER OF STREET TREES-157 REO(157 PROPOSED) LINEAL FEEL OF SL,REET FRONTAGE=5,495 SF TREE MITIGATION ALL EXISTING TREES REMOVED TO BE MITIGATED AT 1:1 RATIO NO ERISMG TM$ON DIFE FOR REOUIRWG Ns1MGttI511 PROPOSED TREE SPECIES MIX .� CONIFER-94 Trees PINUS FLE%I11510e; R51�5%57 T KO1uem ANE sx AFAEL N[1�R FLOEA alnuuN ertluuta¢ys; CLASS II-162 Trees aETVLA NIORA—TAOE"69% ACER RU6RUM 10% - CLASS 111-157 Trees �_ DyMND�LAeus DrDI�A ED% 1, PROPOSED TREE KEY CONFER QASSII C1A55111 -. - O D®0• VANGUARD VILLAGE.I Merid'Mn,IDl Cnndkional Uae Permit lluly 2021 GGLO La SECTION OS I TREE SPECIES MIX B ADDITIONAL DETAILS CLASS I CLASS II CLASS 1I1 CONIFERS � 4 1 A mel.nchier%g,ancrdI*ra'Auku,,R, llursce' BRWIanigra Heritage Gymnocladus dioi Pinuafle%Ilk Set-Acvberry River Birch Kentucky Coifee TTee Limber pine Height:15.25, Neigh.:35.50' Neighs:50.60' Height:40-50` Spread:15-25' Spread:30-40' Spread:35-45' Spread:25.40' Water:Medium Water:Medium Water:Medium Water.Medium Mainlenan—Low Maintenance:Low Maintenance:Low Maintenance:Low Ace,rubrum Udodandron tulipgera Red Maple Tulip Tree Weight-35.45- Height:50-80' Speed:25.35' Spread:35.45' Wafer:Medium Water:Medium Maintenance:low Maintenance low ANGIAtl.DVIIIAGE.I Meri&an,ID I tolarimalUae PRRIR I fu1y 2021 GGLO Lr Page 51 Page 148 Item#8. SECTION 07 1 PLANTING ZONES nrslvtxllr•r Rr.5l vrNn AL FORESTED MOUNTAIN �- ■ ALKALINE SN RUELANDS �'�>�' ■ GRASSY UPLANDS FREASUREVALLEY _ - NOTE:Building elevations shown—those sect'ons are for referenceonlyarld arenoxi—ele.Please seearchltecture section Far pro,osed build ink flans,el—ti—and sections. SECTION% I I I GASEA EM �.t.I�try�aL GRnSSV UPtnxoS 7l• AL%AIINE SN RUeLANvi GRASSY UPLnNo ML � � ♦yip I I I I I I I I I I SECTIONx I I I I I GesEASEMEM I I I I I I lFaL�ITAi ALnALIRE sr:RuawHv=_ eONWkTkW k: I I I SECTION% GAS EASEMENL VANGUARD VILLAGE.I Meridian,ID Conditional Use Permit July 2021 GGLO L-IQ Page 52 Page 149 Item#8. 5. Qualified Open Space-Revised SECTIONO3 OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM _r _ RIF PHASE 1 .\ sr PHASE 3 1 g L�J I. 1 • I OUALIFIEDOPEN SPACE I I I i I R _ _ OUALIFIEDOPEN SPACE CALCULATION MIN.AREA=4005F.PAIN.R.MENSION=20FT.{PERUPCIT-4-3-27C3 IOIAISITEAREA=1,715,21111 II PHASE 1 UNITS OSTYlEEN 500 SF A 1200 SF. - \ 1 270u RES(A 250 SF REO.OPE N SPACE 1=E7.5005F 1 �. \ I U NITS GREATER 714AN 120D SF: 104 UNITS IR 7505E RE OPEN SPACE=3E.,Ea05F ' •' '� \`\ 4 IOIAL REG OPEN SPACE=IIIIJ 605F ' - fOTAI OPEN SPACE PNYI►ED=275.9795F J .�. IT PHASE 7 UNITS 0STWIEN S00 SF E 1200 SF: •- - 152UNITSIA2505FREO.OPEN SPACE)=3R,OaOSF UNITS GREATER THAN 1200 EF: 34 UN175)A 3SOSF RED,OPEN SPACE!=11,909SF - TOTAL AEG OPEN SPACE= 00 D,95F IOfALO►FY SPACE PMYI BED=1I5,712SF _______----_______ YAYEWIO - MAIE: R FNVXTE DFEN SPACE CAICWAPON SEE XRCN1 fFCTURAI PROJECT►XlX Addeo.I M..i&—IN I C-06—l Use P-6,111.11.2021 GGLO 1-3 Page 53 Page 150 Item#8. 6. Site Amenities SECTION 02 I ILLUSTRATIVE LANDSCAPE PLAN SITE AMENITIES 1,COMMON CENTRAL AMENITY AREA WITH NATIVE GRASSES, �. MULTIPURPOSE TRAILS,SOCIAL GATHERING NODES AND SEATING �i ('LOCATED ATOP GAS EASEMENT.NO TREES OR FOUNDATIONS PERMITTED) 2.CLUB HOUSE AMENITY.SWIMMING POOL,HOT TUB,CABANAS AND PRIVACY FENCES 3-OIfTDOOR R(TCHEN A 01NIN& A.FTTRIE55 LOUNGE 5.LAWS!GAMES&FIREP IT LOUN HE II 6.PICKSE BALL COURT T CHILDREN PLAY A I EA R.DOG'PARS 9.RE 5 IRE NTIAL AMENITY AREAS WITH SWIMMING POOL,PICNIC SHELTER FP. Q A ND FIRE PIT LOUNGE IG.AFT&STORMWATER EADUTIES I I.PUMP BUILDING 12.RE S UlEAT1AL AMENIT V AREA WITH PLAY AREA AND 990 LO DNGE 13,60'O'SETSACK IZS'Si RE ET SCAPE PLANTING 53 S'IRRIGATION L--- EASEMENT) IA.5'-0"MIN PARKING LOT PERIMETER LAN]SCAPE STRIP ._R 15.BUFFER YLAfiiING AT OI FS FRFNT LAND USES 16.COVERED PARKING IA.A[U PAN KING 10.7D'STA EET 611 FFEA {F� 19.5'KNDENTIAL MFFfe 20.TRASH LOCATIONS ITYP.SEE L-R A ARCHITECTURE SHEETS FOR TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAILS) VEP9 -�I 21.57E IRM041 (BP)BICYCLE PARKING(SEE PARKING CALCULATION ON CIVIL SHEETS) _ 'NOTE:THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO EXISTING BUILDINGS.STRUCTURES.PLANTING _. —AS,LIGHT POLES,POWER POLES,WALLS,FENCES,RERIIS,PARKING AND LOADING _ MEAS.VEHICULAR DRIVES,TRASII AREAS,SIDEWALKS,PATH WAYS,STORMWATER ODLTFNTION AREAS,SIGNS,STREET FURNITURE OR OTHE R MAN-MADE ELEMENTS ON VANGUARDVILLAGE.I MeridieD,ID I CendfeomlUsePemlit I Nw mber2021 GGLO L2 Page 54 Page 151 Item#8. 7. Building Elevations(dated:September-27y24U March 9,2022)REVISED(NOT APPROVED) Link to complete plan set, including floor plans: https://weblink.meridiancity.orjz/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=248842&dbid=0 &reyo=Meridia n 0ty MATERIAL LEGEND ■ m __ - - m :ill _ �.�� I ■o m m El FFj E' El m 71 .. SLHHEE'MA�IL-2,ARoDEN,BUILDING® MATERIAL LEGEND El 0 1 walzoNTAL MAROIE T GR4Y GREEN ­IERN REO CEDAR DARK DRAT Ilr=iM w. �u.v.�r ■ UCCO 'SMWGLES OFF WHITE aT GARDEN SMF I: y mp- nu TOWNHOUSE-BUILDING3 ELEV�.7I*NS � FOEta.oh ws.wwne..r..�.a:urw•n ni�Hur..no�rwa.www r.v s..E.ssw ras.Hu�Hw..,..ev.�. Page 55 Page 152 Item#8. MATERIAL LEGEND El 0 +rfs.EK..m A:P`x :�LciO rnllM+n nP y«irf L• ti�ulx x'TLLI I Z!'IiaeL+f4•m..lcw�w 3�311n `7 TOWN HOUSE-BUILDING 4 ELEVAIIOn$ MATERIAL LEGEND eNa1ZOxTnL «MDLE WfSTf RH RfO SNCCG tFLu WRK CRIY win -.ten oewr ASPHALT SIlICCO G«IrvGLES Dif WRITE AT GPRDEN STYLE MARTRBUTS I+a.+mr�R TOWN HOUSE-BUILDING 5 ELEV40M aL.�m� rarer r«��n..nRv*ur.wwRi avi.«iaw aow-r.�vnn.rrau w�,oma ae.ur:evei.�--.r>v�_-.r Page 56 Page 153 Item#8. MATERIAL LEGEND �`TTT'IJ ❑ ew.�zauTAL Tevn. GGmN WESIFNN RED STUCCo -- V4 a.0 D.- 0 71 ram• Q o SHINGLES oFF�Wo AT GPkoEry$Tw.E �'� .r.0.Tro3uT4 —_?.......... 2° TOWN HOUSE-BUILDING 6 ELEV�TIONS ei.ao� ula,a car�Q�•w�ai..w.wr.�^oNQselm Na il:..awv v.�aQ.r s.+.•.a bai cax ae,w•eXiA- MATERIAL LEGEND at.,0.H Rfo STUCCO CF�nR D.RK pUv 4� a��Q ❑ "� 4SP STUCCO SHINGLES OFF WNITf sT .Pp4xTlENSTnf S .1�sc[azvw I I weraw,l. .3�N¢ �' TOWN HOUSE-BUILDING 7 ELEvnn.rvs .�.f� >a.�,Ka.N��KN.�Nu,�a�,.���..,,�P.�.�,�,.,�P...mwM.��,M,..�P.....�D�,>�a>n•,.�,�.�.�a...�«n Page 57 Page 154 Item#8. �- CLUBHOUSE - ELEVATIONS. N• Q VERTICAL HARDIE PLANK SLING-W006 Q VERTICAL HARDIE PLANK 1 © SLING-BEIGE F� Q STONE VENEER BACK ELEVATION 0 PAINTED METAL TRIM © HORIZONTAL SLAT SHADE Q CEDAR POSTS&BEAMS 0 STANDING SEAM ROOFING SIDE ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION ve-=r.o. Ve•=r-o.. _ 1 p © O 0 © Q © 0 �7 �KlFrvtBEA zor AM CLUBHOUSE. FRONT ENTRY i io9 ZLDJ EM{P2.21 A802 Page 58 Page 155 1 - �• - ilr t 6 Item#8. VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS& CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. Development Agreement Modification: 1.1 The existing Development Agreement(DA) shall be terminated and a new amended and re- stated DA is required as a provision of the proposed modification which shall at a minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Development of the subject property shall be generally consistent with the site plan, qualified open space exhibit,site amenity exhibit,pedestrian circulation plan, preliminary plat,phasing plan, landscape plan and conceptual building elevations submitted with the applications contained herein. b. All future development, site design and building design shall comply with the guidelines in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan(TMISAP) and the standards in the Architectural Standards Manual(ASM), as applicable. The City Council approved alternatives to the design guidelines in the TMISAP consisting of lower roof pitches of 2:12 for the community clubhouse amenity buildings and 3:12 for the townhome garages to allow larger windows with lower sills at the second level: and front patios with railings that frame off the entrances that are covered by the above balconies instead of front stoops due to concerns pertaining to compliance with ADA requirements. c. An encroachment permit is required for any improvements proposed within the Williams pipeline easement. A copy of the executed encroachment agreement shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of any Certificate of Zoning Compliance for this site. Uses such as daycares, schools,hospitals,assisted living facilities,etc. where occupants are not able to leave the area quickly in case of an emergency, are discouraged in the vicinity of the pipeline. All development within the Williams pipeline easement shall comply with the Williams Developers' Handbook. d. The street sections for Sunset Point Way and Coral Reef Way shall be constructed in accord with Street Section D (residential collector street) in the TMISAP,which requires 11-foot travel lanes,6-foot bike lanes, 8-foot parallel parking, 8-foot parkways and minimum 6-foot wide detached sidewalks(see pg. 3-21 and 3-23). e. The street sections for Vanguard Way and Umbria Hills shall be constructed in accord with Street Section C(major collector street) in the TMISAP with a modification that allows(3) 11-foot travel lanes,on-street parking between the Williams pipeline and the eastern boundary of the site, 8-foot parkways and detached 10-foot wide sidewalks/pathways in lieu of on-street bike lanes as required by ACHD. Streetlights are required at a pedestrian scale(see pg. 3-20, 3-22, 3-23). f. Sidewalks,walkways and pathways shall include dedicated crosswalks at the intersection with all streets within commercial activity centers with changes in color,markings, materials,texture and/or surface to distinguish them from the surrounding pavement as set forth in the TMISAP (see pg. 3-28, Crosswalks). g. Development in the R-15 district shall be consistent with the development guidelines contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (TMISAP) for Medium High Density Residential(MHDR) designated areas. h. Development in the C-C district shall be consistent with the development guidelines contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan(TMISAP) for Mixed Use Commercial(MU-COM)designated areas. Page 60 Page 157 Item#8. i. Development in the M-E district shall be consistent with the development guidelines contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan(TMISAP) for Mixed Employment(ME)designated areas. j. Development in the H-E district shall be consistent with the development guidelines contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (TMISAP) for High-Density Employment(HDE)designated areas. k. Public art in a high quality of design shall be provided in shared spaces and incorporated into the design of streetscapes as set forth in the TMISAP (see pg. 3-47). 1. Design elements shall be provided within the overall development as required in the Application of the Design Elements matrix on pg. 3-49 of the TMISAP. in. The subject property shall be subdivided prior to submittal of any Certificate of Zoning Compliance application(s)and/or building permit applicationo. The Applicant may submit a design review application(s) to finalize building design prior to recordation of the final plat(s). n. The applicant shall submit a Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application to the Planning Division for approval of all future uses on the site to ensure compliance with the Unified Development Code,Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan, Comprehensive Plan, Architectural Standards Manual,and provisions of the development agreement contained herein,prior to issuance of building permits for any structure(s)within this site. 2. Preliminary Plat: 2.1 Future development of the proposed lots is required to comply with the dimensional standards of the R-15 zoning district in UDC Table 11-2A-7 and the C-C, M-E and H-E zoning districts in UDC Table 11-2B-3,as applicable. A minimum building setback of 10-feet is required in the multi-family portion of the development unless a greater setback is otherwise required, per UDC 11-4-3-27B.1. The 20-foot wide collector street buffer may be placed in an easement rather than a common lot in accord with UDC 11-3B7C.2a. Separation between buildings shall comply with Building code. 2.2 The final plat shall include the following revisions: a. Depict the easements for the Marvin Lateral and/or the Purdam Drain on the plat if they encroach on this site. b. Include a note prohibiting direct access via the collector streets other than the access points approved by the City and ACHD with this application. c. Depict street sections for Sunset Point Way and Coral Reef Way consistent with Street Section D in the TMISAP (see pg. 3-21). d. Depict street sections for Vanguard Way and Umbria Hills consistent with Street Section C in the TMISAP with a modification that allows(3) 11-foot travel lanes, on-street parking between the Williams pipeline and the eastern boundary of the site, 8-foot parkways and detached 10-foot wide sidewalks/pathways in lieu of on-street bike lanes as required by ACHD. Streetlights are required at a pedestrian scale(see pg. 3-20, 3-22, 3- 23). e. Depict required street landscape buffers in common lots or on permanent dedicated buffer easements,maintained by the property owner, homeowner's association or business owners' association,as applicable, as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.2.A reduction of the Page 61 Page 158 Item#8. collector street setback may be granted for homes that front on a collector street when certain conditions exist as noted in UDC Table 11-2A-7, note 91. 2.3 The landscape plan submitted with the final plat shall be revised as follows: a. Depict one(1)additional tree within the street buffer along Umbria Hills (east)per the minimum standard listed in UDC 11-3B-7C.3b. b. Widen the street buffer along Umbria Hills to 20-feet as required for a collector street in UDC Table 11-2B-3. c. Depict landscaping within required street buffers in accord with the recently amended standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. d. Landscaping is required within parkways per the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17 and 11-3B-7C.Class II trees shall be provided in parkways in accord with UDC 11-3A-17E; Class III trees may be considered if the parkways are widened to 10 feet. e. Sidewalks,walkways and pathways should include dedicated crosswalks at the intersection with all streets within commercial activity centers with changes in color, markings, materials,texture and/or surface to distinguish them from the surrounding pavement as set forth in the TMISAP (see pg. 3-28, Crosswalks). f. Depict minimum 6-foot wide detached sidewalks along all streets in accord with the street sections(i.e. C and D) in the TMISAP. g. Depict a berm in the street buffer along I-84 in accord with the TMISAP for street buffers along transportation corridors(3.07.01 Q. h. Mitigation trees shall be depicted on the plan(185 trees at 2.5 caliper inches each for a total of 462.5 caliper inches). i. If trees are not allowed within the pipeline easement, an additional 5-feet should be added to the common area outside of the easement to allow for trees; or, alternative compliance may be requested to the planting requirement for pathways and open space. 2.4 All streets shall be constructed as complete streets as defined in the TMISAP (see pg. 3-19 & 3-20). 2.5 All waterways on this site shall be piped as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6B unless otherwise waived by City Council. 2.6 A 14-foot wide public use easement for the multi-use pathways within this site shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to submittal for City Engineer signature on the final plat(s). 2.7 A private street application shall be submitted with the final plat application for the multi- family development as required by the Fire Dept. All private streets shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4. 3. Conditional Use Permit: 3.1 Comply with the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27 for multi-family developments, including but not limited to the following: (revise the site plan and/or landscape plan accordingly) a. All on-site service areas,outdoor storage areas,waste storage,disposal facilities,and transformer and utility vaults shall be located in an area not visible from a public street, Page 62 Page 159 Item#8. or shall be fully screened from view from a public street as set forth in UDC.11-4-3- 27B.2. b. A minimum of eighty(80) square feet of private,usable open space shall be provided for each unit as set forth in UDC 11-4-3-27B.3. This requirement can be satisfied through porches,patios,decks, and/or enclosed yards. Floor plans shall be submitted for all units that demonstrate compliance with this standard. c. Depict the location of the property management office,maintenance storage area, and central mailbox location(including provisions for parcel mail)on the site plan that provides safe pedestrian and/or vehicular access and the location of the directory& map of the development at an entrance or convenient location for those entering the development as set forth in UDC 11-4-3-27B.7. d. Depict a berm or a constructed barrier at least 4 feet in height with breaks in the berm or barrier to allow for pedestrian access within the street buffer along the north side of Vanguard Way in accord with UDC 11-4-3-27C. e. All street facing elevations shall have landscaping along their foundation that meets the minimum standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27E.2. f. All multi-family developments shall record legally binding documents that state the maintenance and ownership responsibilities for the management of the development, including,but not limited to,structures,parking, common areas,and other development features as set forth in UDC 11-4-3-27F. A recorded copy of said documents shall be submitted prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the development.\ 3.2 Include a detail for the bicycle parking facilities that complies with the standards in UDC 11- 3C-5C. Bicycle racks should be depicted in central locations for each building and for the clubhouse. 3.3 Depict landscaping along all pathways per the standards listed in UDC I1-3B-12C,which requires a minimum 5-foot wide landscape strip along each side of the pathway planted with a mix of trees, shrubs, lawn, and/or other vegetative ground cover; a minimum of one (1)tree per 100 linear feet of pathway is required. 3.4 Parking lot landscaping is required to be provided per the standards listed in UDC 11-313-8C. 3.5 A minimum of one(1)tree shall be provided for every 8,000 square feet of common open space. 3.6 The space between building facades and adjacent sidewalks should be landscaped with a combination of lawns,groundcover, shrubs and trees as set forth in the TMISAP. 3.7 " lands^.ped-bid€€ef s13ee1 1- - 11ff_-e_Yided74etwee*4he proposed ae.,elep efit ^ he existing si*gle-family development the-*er-t13 asset-€ei4h4fi-the-T-UISAAI' 3.8 Include a 10-foot wide pathway connection between the pathway along the Purdam Drain and the pathway within the pipeline easement. 3.9 If trees are not allowed within the pipeline easement, an additional 5-feet should be added to the common area outside of the easement to allow for trees; or, alternative compliance may be requested to the planting requirement for pathways and open space. 3.10 All structures shall comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual (ASM) and the design guidelines in the TMISAP for the MHDR designation with the deviations noted in the Development Agreement(see the matrix for Application of the Design Elements on pg. 3-49). Page 63 Page 160 Item#8. 3.11 A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted for approval of the site and building design prior to submittal of building permit applications. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 47-4--Meant-shall-fie-required te-re-reut-the-egg ter-as-sewer- ains4ntwthe-pfopesed readv�,ay-er�tetisiens-e€-E--9alEerest Br-ate-N )i-xie-Ave- 1.2. The geotechnical investigative report prepared by GeoTek, Inc indicates some very specific construction considerations. The applicant shall be responsible for the adherence of these recommendations. 1.3. All mains outside of right-of-way require a 20-foot-wide easement at minimum. For sewer mains of depths 15 feet—30 feet require a 30-foot-wide easement. 1.4. No permanent structures shall be within the footprint of a City utility easement including but not limited to buildings,carports, fences,infiltration trenches,trees,shrubs, light poles, etc. Based off the currently landscape plan, some trees will be in conflict with easements. 1.5. The angle of sewer main into and out of manholes must be a 90-degree minimum. Where the proposed sewer main connects to the existing 36-inch sewer main,this requirement is not met. 1.6. All water main north of Vanguard way should be 8-inch diameter. 1.7. A water main extension is required to the northwest corner of the development for future connection to the west. I.S. Water main in West Navigator should be 12-inch diameter from the east boundary to the west boundary. 1.9. A 12-inch diameter water main shall be extended to the west property boundary on the south side for future connection. 1.10. It is unclear by the provided plans how buildings will be served and how fire protection will be provided. An additional water loop around the buildings might be required to provide fire flow. A complete water plan will be required to be submitted and reviewed by Public Works Engineering before any final plat is approved. 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility,or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via Page 64 Page 161 Item#8. the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x I I"map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed,and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 9-1-28.C). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches,canals,laterals,or drains,exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42- 1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development, and if so, how they will continue to be used, or provide record of their abandonment. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place,sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities,etc., prior to signature on the final plat for the chase which is beini4 developed. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees,as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. Page 65 Page 162 Item#8. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.17 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.18 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.19 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.20 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity,.orzlpublic works.aspx?id=272. 2.21 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature on the phase which is being developed. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887- 2211. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancity.or,f_Y/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=252151&dbid=0&repo=Meridian C ity B. MERIDIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancity.or,Q/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=251147&dbid=0&repo=Meridian C ity - The Police Dept. requests further discussions with the Developer on plans for emergency police access into each building entry point using a multi-technology keypad. Page 66 Page 163 Item#8. C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) https://weblink.meridiancity.orQ/WebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=249959&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ity D. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT(NMID) https:Ilweblink.meridiancity.orQ/WebLink/Doc View.asyx?id=250049&dbid=0&repo=Meridian C ity E. WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT(WASD) https:Ilweblink.meridiancity.orQ/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=252295&dbid=0&repo=Meridian C ity https://weblink.meridiancity.orQ/WebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=252296&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ity F. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO(COMPASS) https:llweblink.meridiancity.orQ/WebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=252341&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ity G. PARK'S DEPARTMENT, REVISED https:Ilweblink.meridiancity.orzlWebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=256235&dbid=0&repo=Meridian C ity H. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https:Ilweblink.meridiancity.orQ/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=256216&dbid=0&repo=Meridian C ity I. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT—SCHOOL IMPACT TABLE htt,os:Ilweblink.meridiancity.orQ/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=258731&dbid=0&repo=Meridian C Iu IX. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-511-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment and subsequent development is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment will allow for the development of a mix of residential, commercial/retail, light industrial and employment uses which will provide for the retail and service needs of the community consistent with the purpose statement of the commercial districts in accord with the Comprehensive Plan. Page 67 Page 164 Item#8. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment will not result in an adverse impact on the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City. 5. The annexation(as applicable) is in the best interest of city. This finding is not applicable as the request is for a rezone, not annexation. B. Preliminary Plat Findings(11-6B-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat, the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; The City Council finds inds that the proposed plat is in substantial compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use and transportation. (Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies in, Section V of this report for more information) 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds that public services will be provided to the subject property with development. (See Exhibit B of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers.) 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the development at their own cost, the City Council finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development based upon comments from the public service providers (i.e., Police, Fire, ACHD, etc.). (See Section VIII for more information.) 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and, The City Council is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated with the platting of this property. ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The City Council is unaware of any significant natural,scenic or historic features that exist on this site that require preserving. Page 68 Page 165 Item#8. C. Conditional Use Permit Findings (UDC 11-513-6E) The Commission shall base its determination on the Conditional Use Permit requests upon the following: 1. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located. The City Council finds that the subject property is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and dimensional and development regulations of the R-15 district (see Analysis, Section V for more information). 2. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accord with the requirements of this Title. The City Council finds that the proposed use as a multi family development is generally consistent with the future land use map designations for this property and is allowed as a conditional use in UDC Table I1-2A-2 in the R-15 zoning district. 3. That the design, construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area. The City Council finds the proposed design of the development, construction, operation and maintenance should be compatible with the mix of other uses planned for this area and with the intended character of the area and that such uses will not adversely change the character of the area. 4. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed,will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. The City Council finds that if the applicant complies with the conditions outlined in this report, the proposed use will not adversely affect other property in the area. 5. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, schools, parks, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal,water,and sewer. The City Council finds that essential public services are available to this property and that the use will be adequately served by these facilities. Page 69 Page 166 7/tem 77 E IDIAN'-'---- JAMu AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Intergovernmental Agreement with Ada County Highway District & Idaho Transportation Department for Linder Road Overpass and Widening Page 167 Item#9. C� fIEN DL4,,A I H .. MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL From: Miranda Carson, Coordination Planner Date: May 12, 2022 Topic: Linder Road Overpass and Widening Design - Intergovernmental Agreement In April 2021, City Council approved a budget allocation of up to $2.5 million dedicated to building the Linder Road Overpass. Since then, City Staff has been coordinating with ACHD and to a lesser extent ITD Staff on this project. In October 2021,the design phase of the Linder Road Overpass and Widening project was initiated. Right-of-way acquisition and construction are not yet programmed. The RFQ for design was posted by ACHD earlier this year,and Keller and Associates was the selected consultant for design. The City and the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) were included in the scope of work review. Ada County Highway District (ACHD) is in process of finalizing negotiations for the scope of work and design estimate with Keller. Design is anticipated to take 18 months and the preliminary cost estimate is approximately $1.6M. The ACHD Commission review for the IGA and Scope of Work are anticipated for May 251h. The intent of this memo is to update Council on the project status overall and the terms of the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) for design of the project. ACHD and City staff have prepared the attached draft IGA in preparation for that agreement to be brought forward for Council consent May 241h. ITD is currently reviewing the final draft,but there are no changes from ITD are foreseen. The final scope with schedule and cost will be included in the May 241h agenda packet as Exhibit A of the IGA. Parties and Scope: The IGA between the City, ITD, and ACHD is limited to design of the project and does not include right-of-way acquisition or construction. Project Description: The project includes expanding Linder Road to 5 lanes between Overland Road and Franklin Road and incorporates a new 4 lane ITD Interstate-84 overpass. In addition to the roadway widening and overpass, the project will include: (2) two pedestrian hybrid beacons at the intersections of Linder Road and Kennedy Lateral, and Linder Road and Ten Mile Creek; and bicycle and pedestrian facilities including a raised concrete barrier on the bridge. ACHD's Responsibilities:ACHD will hire and manage the consultant to complete design in no more than 24 months. Notice to proceed will immediately follow the ACHD Commission approval of the design contract. ACHD will have the final authority to make all decisions regarding the design and coordinate with ITD on the formal bridge design process. City's Responsibilities: City will participate on the ACHD project team and maintain a reserve account of$2.5M from which to provide reimbursement to ACHD for design services. ITD's Responsibilities: ITD will coordinate with ACHD for the design of the new 4 lane ITD Interstate-84 overpass and participate on the ACHD project team. ITD will not seek any financial reimbursement from the City for any ITD expenses related to design. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding the IGA. Page 168 INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT FOR CITY OF MERIDIAN'S FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTION TO ACHD PROJECT, LINDER ROAD, OVERLAND TO FRANKLIN DESIGN PHASE This Agreement is entered into this _day of May, 2022, by and between the City of Meridian, hereinafter referred to as "City", the Ada County Highway District, hereinafter referred to as "ACHD", and the Idaho Transportation Department, hereinafter called "ITD" for the purpose of setting forth a general agreement as to cooperation between the parties for the mutual benefit of the parties to successfully finance the design phase of the Linder Road,Overland to Franklin road project in Ada County. WHEREAS, ACHD is a single county-wide highway district, a public entity, organized and existing pursuant to Title 40, Chapter 14, Idaho Code, as amended and supplemented,with the exclusive jurisdiction, and authority to maintain, improve, regulate, and operate public rights-of- way in Ada County;; WHEREAS, CITY is a public entity organized and operating pursuant to Idaho Code Title 50, as amended and supplemented. CITY is a municipal corporation with jurisdiction, authority and police power to regulate and control municipal activities within the City; WHEREAS, ITD, a public entity and executive department of the State of Idaho, duly organized and existing pursuant to title 40, Chapter 5, Idaho Code, as amended and supplemented, with the exclusive jurisdiction over the state highway system; WHEREAS, ACHD has programmed the design of a road project that expands Linder Road to 5 lanes between Overland Road and Franklin Road and incorporates a new 4 lane ITD Interstate-84 overpass ("ROAD PROJECT"); WHEREAS,in addition to the roadway widening and overpass,the ROAD PROJECT will include: (1) two pedestrian hybrid beacons at the intersections of Linder Road and Kennedy Lateral, and Linder Road and Ten Mile Creek; and (2) ACHD's Bicycle and Pedestrian Level of Stress which reflects users' relative comfort and safety on roads and intersections, also including a raised concrete barrier on the bridge; WHEREAS, the ROAD PROJECT will have significant benefits to the community, including adding a direct connection for fire and EMS services linking neighborhoods to the north with future planned development to the south; WHEREAS, CITY desires to accelerate the design and development of the ROAD PROJECT and is willing to assist ACHD financially to fulfill expedited design completion; WHEREAS, it would be to the mutual benefit of CITY, ACHD, and ITD to work together to accomplish the much-needed ROAD PROJECT; WHEREAS,nothing herein shall be interpreted to accelerate or advance the programming of the ROAD PROJECT. The completion of the ROAD PROJECT is dependent upon ACHD's project programming and ability to fund the ROAD PROJECT. WHEREAS,Idaho Code § 67-2332 provides that one or more public agencies may contract with any one or more other public agencies to perform any governmental service, activity, o Page 169 undertaking which each public agency entering into the contract is authorized by law to perform, provided that such contract is authorized by the governing body of each party and that such contract shall set forth fully the purposes, powers, rights, objectives and responsibilities of the contracting parties; and WHEREAS,ACHD, CITY and ITD,pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2332, have authority to enter into this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, the ACHD, CITY, and ITD do hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS As used in this Agreement,the following words when capitalized have the meaning herein stated: 1.1 ACHD shall mean the Ada County Highway District, a body politic and corporate of the State of Idaho, whose address is 3775 N Adams Street, Garden City, Idaho 83714-6499. 1.2 CITY shall mean the City of Meridian whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. 1.3 ITD shall mean the Idaho Department of Transportation whose address is 3311 West State Street, PO Box 7129 Boise, ID 83707. 1.4 CONSULTANT shall mean the firm selected by ACHD to design the ROAD PROJECT. 1.5 ROAD PROJECT shall mean ACHD's design of Linder Road from Overland Road to Franklin Road with a freeway overpass over Ineterstate-84 including necessary intersection improvements. ARTICLE 2. ACHD'S RESPONSIBILITIES ACHD AGREES TO: 2.1 Hire CONSULTANT to provide design and related professional services for the ROAD PROJECT consistent with the Scope of Work, Budget and Schedule attached hereto as EXHIBIT A. ACHD shall issue to CONSULTANT a Notice to Proceed to provide professional services for the ROAD PROJECT within seven (7) days from the date that this Interagency Agreement is fully executed. 2.2 Coordinate with ITD for the design of the new 4 lane ITD Interstate-84 overpass, following ITD's formal bridge design process. 2.3 Invite CITY to participate in the design process for all aspects of the ROAD PROJECT. Interagency Agreement ACHD/ITD/City of Meridian— Page 2 Page 170 2.4 Provide to CITY in a timely manner, appropriate documentation of CONSULTANT fees and costs related to the design of the ROAD PROJECT and seek reimbursement for the fees and costs charged by CONSULTANT related to the design of the ROAD PROJECT. 2.5 In no event will ACHD seek reimbursement from CITY in excess of the total fees and costs charged by CONSULTANT for the professional services related to the design of the ROAD PROJECT, or Two and a Half Million Dollars ($2,500,000.00) total, whichever is less. 2.6 In no event shall federal funds be used in funding the ROAD PROJECT. 2.7 The estimated fees and costs of CONSULTANT for the design of the ROAD PROJECT are set forth in the Scope of Work, Budget and Schedule attached hereto as EXHIBIT A. ACHD agrees that it will not seek reimbursement for any cost overruns of professional services over and above the maximum amount set forth in Section 2.5. 2.8 ACHD shall own all the rights to the design drawings and supporting documentation. 2.9 ACHD shall have the final authority to make all decisions regarding the design of the ROAD PROJECT. ARTICLE 3. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES CITY AGREES TO: 3.1 Participate on the ACHD project team related to the design of the ROAD PROJECT. 3.2 Timely review (no later than 21 days) and provide comment on all plans and documents associated with the design of the ROAD PROJECT as requested by ACHD. 3.3 Maintain a reserve account in the amounts identified in the Scope of Work, Budget and Schedule attached hereto as EXHIBIT A, and as further agreed to consistent with Section 2.5 from which to provide reimbursement to ACHD as provided in Section 2.4. 3.4 Within thirty(30) days after the end of each calendar month and based on receipt of the information described in Section 2.4 above,remit to ACHD the total amount paid during the applicable calendar month for the fees and costs incurred for the design of the ROAD PROJECT. 3.5 Reimburse ACHD for any additional fees and costs charged by CONSULTANT and agreed to as provided in section 2.5. ARTICLE 4.. ITD'S RESPONSIBILITIES ITD AGREES TO: Interagency Agreement ACHD/ITD/City of Meridian— Page 3 Page 171 4.1 Coordinate with ACHD for the design of the new 4 lane ITD Interstate-84 overpass design, following ITD's formal bridge design process. 4.2 Invite CITY to participate in the design process for the Interstate-84 overpass. 4.3 Participate on the ACHD project team related to the design of the ROAD PROJECT. 4.4 Timely review (no later than 21 days) and provide comment on all plans and documents associated with the design of the ROAD PROJECT as requested by ACHD. 4.5 ITD agrees to not seek any financial reimbursement from CITY or ACHD for any ITD expenses related to design of the ROAD PROJECT. ARTICLE 5.. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 5.1 Notice. Any and all notices required to be given by the parties hereto, shall be in writing, other than those instances in this Agreement wherein oral notice is specifically allowed, and will be deemed communicated when mailed, first class,postage prepaid in the United States mail addressed as follows: a) CITY: City Clerk City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642; b) IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 3311 W. State Street PO Box 7129 Boise, ID 83707-1129 c) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: Senior Project Manager, Capital Projects Ada County Highway District 3775 N. Adams Street Garden City, Idaho 83714 5.2 The effective date of this Agreement will be immediately after all Parties have approved this Agreement and official signatures have been affixed. 5.3 In the event of termination, any amounts due and owing to CONSULTANT for work performed shall remain the responsibility of CITY consistent with Articles 3 and 4. 5.4 No Party to this Agreement shall assign its interest in whole or in part in this Agreement without the written consent of the other Parties. Interagency Agreement ACHD/ITD/City of Meridian— Page 4 Page 172 5 . 5 This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Idaho . 5 . 6 This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by all Parties . The parties agree to cooperate in good faith in any future supplemental agreement or addendum. 53 Should any portion of this Agreement be found to be unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction such determination shall not void the entire Agreement, but will be limited only to those unenforceable provisions . 5 . 8 In the event any Party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend litigation with respect to the terms hereof, or the rights granted hereunder, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to all reasonable attorney' s fees and costs incurred in such litigation. 5 . 9 BindingEffect .ffect . This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties . 5 . 10 Counterparts . This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument; 5 . 11 Time of Essence . Time is of the essence . 5 . 12 Breach. In the event of a breach of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, a non-breaching party has the right to terminate the agreement after 30 days written notice to a breaching party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have hereunto caused this Agreement to be executed, on the day, month and year first above written. ATTEST : ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT By : By: Bruce Wong, Director Mary May, President, Board of Commissioners Qo�s�° AUG ATTE �T CVFI N By : Oly,utBC sJo s n i , o�No i son, Mayor dA SEAS TRANSPORTATIONIDAHO°�ylFRacine �ra DEPARTMENT T By : District Engineer 18148922 v2 Interagency Agreement ACHD/ITD/City of Meridian — Page 5 A KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES SCOPE OF WORK Linder Road, Overland Road to Franklin Road ACHD Project No. 522038 The Linder Road, Overland Road to Franklin Road project will expand Linder Road from two lanes to five lanes between Overland Rd and Franklin Rd and incorporate a new four-lane Interstate 84 overpass. The project will connect to both the existing intersections of Linder Rd and Overland Rd, and Linder Rd and Franklin Rd to accommodate the roadway expansion. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities will be in accordance with Livable Streets Performance Measures adopted by the ACHD Commission. Only the connect legs of intersections will be improved. The project includes Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons near Waltman Lane and at the Ten Mile Creek pathway. Alternate or additional enhanced crossing locations may be evaluated by the project team. The project will include continuous street lighting between Overland Road and Franklin Road. The project will include the replacement of ACHD bridges, #1200 over the Ten Mile Creek and#1537 over the Kennedy Lateral. Relocate irrigation facilities along the project. Two virtual public involvement meetings will be required. Keller Associates, herein called the Consultant, will design the project and supply documentation in accordance with this scope of work, the current version of the ISPWC specifications with the current ISPWC updates as amended by ACHD adopted supplements, including the ACHD Supplemental Traffic Provisions. Precision Engineering, LLC will provide traffic signal design for the intersection of Overland and Franklin, along with the design of the two PHBs, herein called Sub-consultant. Forsgren will provide the structural design of the overpass and coordinate with ITD bridge section, herein called Sub-consultant. Terracon will conduct geotechnical field investigations, testing, calculations, and reporting for the project, herein called Sub-consultant. Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 1 of 35 page 174 D KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE OF WORK 1 Definitions and Acronyms 4 Implied Terms 5 Coordination of Scope of Work 5 1 .0 GENERAL PROVISIONS 5 1.1 Progress Meetings & Meridian Task Force Meetings .................................................... 5 1.2 Project Administration.................................................................................................... 6 1.3 ACHD Standards ............................................................................................................ 6 2.0 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 7 2.1 Outreach(Not in Scope of Work)................................................................................... 7 2.2 Virtual Public Meetings.................................................................................................. 7 3.0 LOCATION SURVEYING AND MAPPING 8 3.1 Project Control................................................................................................................ 8 3.2 Boundary Survey and Monument Preservation.............................................................. 8 3.3 Topographic Survey and Base Map................................................................................ 9 4.0 30% DESIGN 10 4.1 Geotechnical Investigation............................................................................................ 10 4.2 Not Used....................................................................................................................... 14 4.3 I-84 Overpass Bridge Alternate Study.......................................................................... 14 4.4 Tenmile Creek and Kennedy Lateral Bridges............................................................... 17 4.5 Concept Roadway Design............................................................................................. 18 4.6 Traffic ........................................................................................................................... 18 4.7 Hydraulic/Stormwater Design ...................................................................................... 19 4.8 Irrigation Facilities........................................................................................................ 20 4.9 Environmental Evaluation ............................................................................................ 21 4.10 30% Design Submittal .................................................................................................. 23 4.11 30% Review Meeting.................................................................................................... 24 5.0 75% DESIGN 24 5.1 75% Traffic Signal Design............................................................................................ 25 5.2 Roadway Design........................................................................................................... 25 5.3 Hydraulic/Stormwater Design ...................................................................................... 25 5.4 Gravity Irrigation.......................................................................................................... 25 5.5 Signing, Pavement Marking, Illumination.................................................................... 25 5.6 Agency and Utility Coordination.................................................................................. 25 5.7 Utility Plans .................................................................................................................. 26 5.8 Temporary Traffic Control ........................................................................................... 26 5.9 Pedestrian Detour Plan.................................................................................................. 26 5.10 Quantities and Construction Estimate........................................................................... 27 5.11 75% Design Submittal .................................................................................................. 27 Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 2 of 35 page 175 D KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work 5.12 75% Review Meeting.................................................................................................... 28 6.0 95% DESIGN 29 6.1 Roadway Design........................................................................................................... 29 6.2 95% Design Submittal .................................................................................................. 29 6.3 95% Review Meeting.................................................................................................... 33 7.0 99% DESIGN SUBMITTAL 33 7.1 Finalize Plans for Right of Way Acquisition................................................................ 34 8.0 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING 35 Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 3 of 35 page 176 A KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES General Consistent with professional standard of care, Consultant shall provide management, coordination and direction to project team and sub-consultants to complete project deliverables on time and within budget. Definitions and Acronyms 404 Permit— Section 404 of the Clean Water Act which addresses permits for dredged or fill material in Waters of the US, administered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers AASHTO—American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ACHD—Ada County Highway District ADT—Average Daily Traffic count Agreement Administrator—The ACHD Project Manager is responsible for administering the contract and overseeing the design. CAC—Community Advisory Committee CAD—Computer Aided Design COMPASS—Community Planning Association of SW Idaho CPM—Critical Path Method CSS—Context Sensitive Solutions FA—Forsgren Associates (Sub-consultant to Keller Associates) FHWA—Federal Highway Administration EPA—Environmental Protection Agency GIS—Geographic Information System GSI—Green Stormwater Infrastructure Holidays—ACHD recognized holidays occur on: New Year's Day, Presidents' Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day,Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, Friday after Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve, and Christmas Day. ITD -Idaho Transportation Department Man-Hour—Hour(s) of time required for an individual to complete an itemized task designated by the project scope of work. Personnel functions shall be rounded up to the nearest Man-Hour. MOU—Memorandum of Understanding NEPA—National Environmental Policy Act PIM—Public Involvement Meeting PMG—Project Management Guide PSA—Professional Service Agreement, or Professional Agreement. This is a written agreement or contract between ACHD and the Prime Consultant Prime Consultant—The firm contracting with ACHD, for the performance of work prescribed in the contract. Project Manager—(Also abbreviated as "PM"). The ACHD point of contact for the project. ROW—Right of Way SHPO— State Historic Preservation Office Study Area—The expanded area of influence generated by the project area. Sub-Consultant—Who the prime Consultant sublets part(s) of the design contract. SOW— Scope of Work Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 4 of 35 Page 177 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES SWPPP— Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Implied Terms In order to avoid confusing repetition of expressions in this Scope of Work, it is provided that whenever anything is to be required, directed, specified, authorized, furnished, given, designated, permitted, reserved, approved, disapproved, accepted, or rejected, it shall be understood as if the expression were followed by the words "by the Project Manager" or"to the Project Manager" Whenever anything is to be performed, designed, computed, calculated, analyzed, determined, evaluated, surveyed, obtained, established, contacted, estimated, investigated, prepared, developed, delivered, collected, and/or recorded, it shall be understood as if the expression were followed by the words "by the Consultant(either prime or sub)" or"to the Consultant (either prime or sub)." Coordination of Scope of Work The Scope of Work and Professional Services Agreement are essential parts of the project, and a requirement occurring in one is as binding as though occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and to describe and provide for a complete package. Checkpoints or milestones have been established at various stages that require approval of specific project information. These checkpoints are: 30% Design Review Submitted on (10-27-2022) 75%Design Review Submitted on (03-23-2023) 95% Design Review Submitted on (07-20-2023) 99%Design(Right of Way Plans) Submitted on(10-26-2023) 1 .0 GENERAL PROVISIONS 1.1 Progress Meetings & Meridian Task Force Meetings Products and Deliverables • Kick-Off Meeting • Milestones Meetings and Agendas • Draft Meeting Minutes/Summary • Final Meeting Minutes/Summary ACHD Responsibilities • Schedule and provide facility for progress meetings • Review and approve summary and action items Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 5 of 35 Page�7s KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES Assumptions • The project is expected to be eighteen months in duration • Eighteen progress meetings are assumed and additional meetings must be approved by ACHD. Each meeting will last one hour with an additional hour budgeted for each meeting for Consultant PM to prepare agendas and meeting minutes. Consultant PM and two other Consultant staff will attend progress meetings. Precision, Forsgren, Terracon, and Bionomics will attend as invited for specific meeting discussions, estimate effort is in the labor estimate. • ACHD will review and approve summary within one week • Four City of Meridian Task Force meetings are assumed. Each meeting to last two hours with additional hour for each meeting to prepare. Consultant PM and one subconsultant will attend. • Action items will be completed by due date 1.2 Project Administration Products and Deliverables • Time-scaled logic diagram (Gantt Chart),updated monthly and submitted with monthly invoicing • Monthly Project Status Report (updated monthly and included with invoice) • Earned Value Report • Invoice (PDF emailed to invoicesgachdidaho.org) which includes a table on the first page dividing total invoice amount into project sub-numbers based on these percentages: ACHD Responsibilities • Review and approve Schedule, Invoice and Monthly Project Status Report 1.3 ACHD Standards All projects shall follow the ACHD Policy Manual. Refer to section 3004 ROADWAY DESIGN STANDARDS. Where both minimum and desirable values are provided, every reasonable effort shall be made to achieve the desirable standards. Any design exception must be approved by ACHD in writing. The roadway widths adopted by ACHD and identified on the Master Street Map shall serve as the basis for beginning evaluation. If the proposed width or other standard is less than ACHD standards, it must be documented,justified, and approved by ACHD. Additionally,the following standards shall be used: • ACHD Livable Street Design Guide • Ada County Master Streets Map • ACHD Complete Streets Policy • AASHTO Guide for Flexibility in Highway Design Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 6 of 35 page 179 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES • Roundabout Application Guidelines for Ada County • ACHD CAD Standards • Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) Guidance Manual • Stormwater Management Pond Revegetation Guidance Manual • The I-84 Overpass Bridge is required to meet ITD requirements and will utilize the ITD Standards listed below. If any of the following ITD Standards conflict with ACHD Standards then ITD standards will take precedent and be utilized on the I-84 Overpass Bridge design,plans, and specifications: o ITD LRFD Bridge Design Manual o AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 9th Edition. Unless a more current version is adopted by ITD at time of the Situation& Layout approval. o The current version of the ITD Standard Specifications in use by ITD at time of Situation& Layout approval will be utilized for bridge construction. o Bridge plans will be prepared in accordance with ITD ORD format in MicroStation. 2.0 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 2.1 Outreach (Not in Scope of Work) 2.2 Virtual Public Meetings Products and Deliverables • Preparation for meetings including pre-PIM • Meeting materials (agenda, display boards, etc.) o Any exhibits to be on project website must be ADA compliant for viewing online • Plan view display board converted to 11"x17" PDF(s) • Consultant will design public involvement notification mailers in Adobe InDesign or Illustrator and provide working files and links to ACHD once finalized. • Consultant will prepare a brief comment summary outlining themes from what was heard from the public as well as an executive summary in an infographic format. Assumptions • Two virtual public meetings will be held. PIM 1 will be at concept and PIM 2 will be during the design phase. • ACHD will review and approve all public involvement notification mailers; • ACHD will provide the following advertising materials: o Sandwich boards, newspaper ads, social media posts • ACHD will advertise meetings • Consultant will prepare two (2) Esri ArcGIS Online StoryMap (StoryMap) or equivalent, meetings (including an online comment form)to present information to the public and gather feedback/comments. Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 7 of 35 page 180 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES • Exhibits: o Visualization exhibits/renderings/sliders will be created for public meetings that extend beyond the typical roll plots over an aerial. o Printable versions of exhibits/engagement effort and survey will be provided to ACHD for those that request printed information be mailed to them. The printable format will mirror what is seen online and will be high quality. o All materials will be ADA compliant. • ACHD will be responsible for printing and postage of notification materials and follow- up letters 3.0 LOCATION SURVEYING AND MAPPING 3.1 Project Control • Coordinates for all survey data including topographic data, Right of Way data, monuments, control points set and found, benchmarks, and all mapping shall be provided to ACHD on the Ada County GIS Coordinate System which is a modified state plane projection unique from standard Idaho State Plane Coordinate system. • Calibration points shall be set outside of the construction limits to form a box around the length and width of the project. Four(4) calibration points shall be set for projects under 2,000 linear feet, two before the beginning of construction and two past the end of construction. On projects over 2,000 feet, an additional two monuments will be set near the middle of the project(outside the construction limits). Intersection projects will require placement of five (5) calibration points. One at the limits of each intersection leg and one near the center of the intersecting roadways. The calibration points shall be a minimum of a %2 inch rebar with control cap. The monuments must have Ada County GIS coordinates and the elevation shown for each monument. Elevation shall be based on the North American Vertical Datum(NAVD) 88. • Temporary Benchmarks (TBM's) shall be set at intervals of approximately 500 feet. The TBM's shall be established in locations which minimize disturbance during construction and must be easily accessible to the contractor and/or surveyor. Monuments within the roadway, i.e. centerline monuments, and intersection monuments as well as chiseled"X" in curbs which will be destroyed during construction shall not be used as TBM's. • Additional control will be set on the north and south sides of 1-84 at the location of the proposed bridge. 3.2 Boundary Survey and Monument Preservation • Right of Entry letters prepared and delivered to ACHD for review and approval. After ACHD approval, the letters shall be delivered to the property owners by the consultant at least 7 days before survey activities begin. • Request Title Reports for approximately 36 parcels; parcel numbers and name of owners will be included in request. Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 8 of 35 page 181 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES • Perform research of ROW plans, records of surveys, subdivision plats, corner perpetuation and filing forms (CP&Fs),National Geodetic Survey(NGS) data records for use in determining existing right-of-way and monument preservation per Idaho Code (IC) 55-1313. • Perform a boundary survey to determine existing rights-of-way and monuments of record and not of record to be used in right-of-way acquisition and monument preservation. • Prepare descriptions and exhibits for approximately 36 property acquisitions. • Monument property corners of property acquisitions and prepare and record, a record of survey per Idaho Code (IC) 55-19. Property corners will be monumented on acquired parcels. Permanent easements will be monumented at the discretion of the professional land surveyor. Record of Survey cannot be completed until ACHD provides copies of all the recorded documents. • Provide a monument preservation control sheet with required actions. • Prepare an existing Right of Way and property ownership base map including available easement data. • Right of way/appraisal staking—Staking includes existing right of way lines, proposed right of way acquisitions and all easements including temporary easements. Lines shall be staked according to ACHD survey standards: o Existing Right of Way—Red flagging or paint o Proposed Right of Way—Orange flagging or paint o Permanent Easement—Yellow flagging or paint Temporary Easement—Blue flagging or paint 3.3 Topographic Survey and Base Map • Request to ACHD and digline for utility locates. Hire private utility location company to mark existing underground utilities. • Base mapping for design and digital terrain model of existing ground and features will be developed using LiDAR data collected for this project along an approximate 300-foot- wide corridor for the length of the project. • Provide supplemental topographic surveying to include visible and marked utilities,two water crossings, minor canal cross sections, bridges, potholes, and items not able to be located with the UDAR data. Products and Deliverables • All Surveyors, Consultants and Contractor personnel working on or near school property must fill out the National Sex Offender Registry. ACHD Responsibilities • Review, approve, sign, and deliver the right of entry letter back to the consultant. • Supply Title Reports within 30 days of request, or as they are received, via ACHD's PWA site, notifying Consultant when uploaded. Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 9 of 35 Page�a2 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES • Provide utility facility maps to Consultants and transmit design review drawings to municipalities, utility companies, and irrigation districts. • Provide additional title reports upon request. • ACHD will provide consultant with all old right of way plans, if any. Assumptions • The roadway and Right of Way mapping limits consist of a corridor approximately 300- feet wide, centered on the section line. Additional survey width may be required to identify property features (i.e. fence lines) along project corridor. Features will be surveyed beyond the fence lines where feasible and relevant to the project and will be included in right of entry letters. Topographic survey for driveways will go back 100 feet or to the garage door,whichever occurs first. • All survey data including found and set monuments shall be converted to the Ada County GIS Coordinate System which is a modified state plane projection unique from standard Idaho State Plane Coordinates. All mapping provided to ACHD shall be on the Ada County GIS Coordinate System. A list of physical monuments with the corresponding Ada County GIS coordinates is available at https:Hadacouply.id.gov/Development- Services/Surveying-Division/GPS-Control. o The feature location surveys for determination of x,y,z coordinate values, shall comply with FGDC Geospatial Positioning Accuracy Standards, Part 4: Standards for Architecture, Engineering, Construction(A/E/C), and Facility Management. • This scope of work assumes 36 parcels may have Right of Way impacts and require legal descriptions and accompanying sketches, exhibits, and record-of-survey. • All original field notes and computer files shall become the property of ACHD. • No paper copies of the base map will be provided. • The First Order National Geodetic Survey(NGS) monument located within the project will not be relocated as part of this project. 4.0 30% DESIGN The minimum information required on 30% design review plans shall show existing facilities/features (including utilities) and location and general design features of planned facilities including existing and proposed right of way. This includes but is not limited to line and grade and other related items that will affect project design. These plans should be 30% complete at minimum. 4.1 Geotechnical Investigation Terracon will perform field explorations and laboratory analyses of existing soils and will prepare geotechnical engineering reports for the foundations of the proposed bridges, MSE walls, embankments, drainage improvements, and pavements. Field Exploration Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 10 of 35 page 183 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES Terracon's field exploration will include the following: • New Overpass - A total of three borings (one at each abutment and one at the center pier) will be drilled to depths no greater than about 100 feet to provide information for the new bridge foundations. • MSE Walls and Embankments - A maximum of eight borings will be drilled in areas of the proposed MSE walls at the approach embankments. These borings will be drilled at a horizontal spacing of approximately 200 feet to maximum depths of about 20 to 40 feet or to auger refusal, depending on the height of the wall at the boring location. • 10-Mile Creek Bridge -A total of two borings (one at each abutment)will be drilled to depths no greater than about 20 to 30 feet, or to auger refusal, to provide information for the new bridge foundations. • Pavement Improvements— Subsurface information from the borings drilled for the structures will also be used for design of the new pavements, as appropriate. In addition, four to five pavement borings will be drilled to a depth of about 5 feet to obtain samples of subgrade soils for pavement design. These borings will typically be spaced about 500 to 700 feet from other borings. • Stormwater Management Areas—No more than three borings will be drilled in proposed stormwater management areas to explore the subsurface soil conditions and to construct piezometers for future groundwater measurement. The piezometers will be constructed in each boring using two-inch I.D. PVC and will be protected with a flush-mount vault and locking cap. The piezometers will extend to a maximum depth of about 17'/2 feet or to auger refusal, whichever occurs first. No more than three infiltration tests will be performed. See below for a discussion regarding infiltration testing services. Terracon will use a subcontracted traffic control provider during our drilling operations. Terracon will submit permit applications to ACHD and ITD (including traffic control plans) for work to be performed in the right of way. The borings will be logged by a field engineer or geologist, and samples will be collected during drilling. The borings will be backfilled in accordance with IDWR requirements. Prior to drilling, Terracon will mark the proposed boring locations and contact Digline, the local "one-call"utility locate service, to coordinate the identification of buried utilities near the proposed boring locations. If there are existing on-site utility lines that will not be marked by this service, these utilities will need to be marked by the project or property owner prior to drilling activities. The services of a private utility locating subcontractor are not included in our services, and we cannot be responsible for utilities that are not marked. Groundwater Measurements In accordance with the ACHD Policy Manual, groundwater measurements will be taken twice monthly from approximately mid-April through the end of October 2022. Infiltration Testing Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 11 of 35 page 184 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES Details regarding the project's stormwater management facilities have not yet been developed. Once details of specific stormwater management facilities are determined, up to three infiltration tests will be performed at specifically selected stormwater management locations using a method described in Appendix B of Section 8200 of the ACHD Policy Manual. The specific test method(s)will be selected once the type(s), depth(s), and locations of the stormwater facilities are known and considering access and public safety at the selected locations. For budgeting purposes, we assume the infiltration tests will consist of in-situ small-scale pilot infiltration test performed in backhoe test pits. We assume these infiltration tests will be outside of roadway and shoulder areas and that traffic control will not be required to construct or perform the tests. Laboratory Testing Laboratory testing will be conducted on representative samples of soil obtained from the field exploration, and may include: moisture content, gradation, Atterberg limits,pH, minimum resistivity, consolidation, R-value, and moisture-density relationships. The actual tests performed will depend on the specific soil conditions encountered. At the end of our services, samples will either be disposed of or picked up by ACHD for storage. Geotechnical Engineering Analysis Geotechnical engineering analyses that will be performed for the three bridges, MSE Walls, new pavements, embankments, and stormwater management testing include: • Evaluate soil samples and laboratory data for variations in pavement subgrade support. • Reduce traffic data to evaluate design traffic loading for pavement reconstruction. • Develop a flexible pavement section design for the proposed roadway reconstruction using ACHD design procedures. • Evaluate driven pile foundation lateral and axial capacities for the overpass structure. A spread footing foundation type and a pile foundation type will both be evaluated for the pier. • Evaluate spread footing bearing capacities for the structures at the Kennedy Lateral and 10-Mile Creek. • Evaluate bearing capacity for contractor design of MSE Walls. • Evaluate settlement of spread footings, MSE walls, and embankments. • Evaluate lateral earth pressures. • Evaluate seismic site class based on the encountered soil conditions. Geotechnical Engineering Reports Terracon will prepare a total of two reports, as described below: • A report meeting the requirements in the ITD Materials Manual for a Geotechnical Engineering Report will be prepared for the proposed overpass and associated MSE retaining walls and approach embankments. • A report will be prepared that includes geotechnical engineering recommendations for the proposed structures at the Kennedy Lateral and Tenmile Creek, for the proposed new flexible pavements for Linder Road, and for the proposed stormwater improvements. Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 12 of 35 page 185 KELLER &--ara r. Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES This report will not meet the requirements for an ITD Geotechnical Engineering Report or Roadway Materials Report. A draft version of each report will be submitted for review by the design team and ACHD. Review comments will be addressed and incorporated, as appropriate, into a final version of the report. The scope and budget do not include additional revisions after submittal of the final report. Preparation of Geotechnical Related Special Provisions Terracon will develop geotechnical related special provisions, as needed for the project. Review of Geotechnical Aspects of Plans and Special Provisions Terracon will review the geotechnical aspects of the project plans and special provisions. Results of this review will be presented in a letter to Keller Associates, Inc. Products and Deliverables • Draft Geotechnical Engineering Report for the proposed overpass and associated MSE walls and approach embankments. (This report will meet the requirements in the ITD Materials Manual for a Geotechnical Engineering Report). • Draft geotechnical engineering report for the proposed Kennedy Lateral and Tenmile Creek structures, pavements, and stormwater management improvements. (This report will not meet the requirements in the ITD Materials Manual for a Geotechnical Engineering Report or Roadway Materials Report). • Final Geotechnical Engineering Report for the proposed overpass and associated MSE walls/embankments that incorporates ACHD and ITD review comments, as appropriate. • Final geotechnical engineering report for the proposed Kennedy Lateral and Tenmile Creek structures, pavements, and stormwater management improvements that incorporates ACHD review comments, as appropriate. • Groundwater measurements from the piezometers. Groundwater measurements taken after submittal of the final geotechnical engineering report will be reported via email. • Geotechnical related special provisions will be prepared by Terracon for inclusion in the design submittals. • Letter that includes Terracon's comments from review of the geotechnical aspects of the project plans and special provisions. ACHD Responsibilities • Obtain permission from owners for field exploration on private property, if applicable. • Waive fees associated with the ACHD Temporary Highway Use Permit for borings drilled in ACHD right of way. • Supply traffic volume information for pavement design. Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 13 of 35 page 186 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES Assumptions • The boring and piezometer locations will be accessible with a truck-mounted drill rig. • Drilling and other work within ACHD right of way will be performed during the daylight hours of 9:00 am to 4:00 pm. Fieldwork within ITD right-of-way will require nightwork between 10:00 pm and 5:00 am. We assume ITD will waive the permit fee for these services. • Private utility location services are not included in this scope. If private utilities not identified by DigLine are located near the exploration locations, these should be located by the property owner. If a private utility locating contractor is needed to identify utility locations on private property, a supplemental agreement will be needed. • MSE walls will be constructed at the overpass approaches on both sides of Linder Road. MSE walls will have lengths no greater than 500 feet. • No more than three infiltration test locations will be required. Small-scale pilot infiltration tests will be performed in private property. If infiltration tests will be located in existing right of way, falling head borehole test methods will be used. • After completion of drilling and infiltration testing, the boring and infiltration rate test locations will be surveyed by the project surveyor. • The intersections of Linder Road with Franklin Road and Overland Road will not be included in this project. • Rigid pavement section and pavement rehabilitation alternatives will not be provided, and a life cycle costs analysis will not be performed. • The overpass bridge may be supported on pile foundations, so it can be designed with integral abutments. The Kennedy Lateral and Tenmile Creek structures will be supported on shallow foundations. • ITD Materials Report formats will not be required for the Linder Road pavement improvements or the structures over the Kennedy Lateral and Tenmile Creek, and ITD will not review the report for these features. • Keller will prepare the Foundation Investigation Plats for the overpass structure and associated MSE walls for inclusion in the ITD Geotechnical Engineering Report. 4.2 Not Used 4.3 /-84 Overpass Bridge Alternate Study The Bridge Alternate Study for the I-84 Overpass will be completed as an ITD Type, Size & Location(TS&L) Report in accordance with applicable sections of ITD Bridge Design Manual. After approval of the TS&L Report, an ITD Situation& Layout (S&L)plan set will be prepared for approval by ITD. Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 14 of 35 page 187 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES Draft TS&L Report—A TS&L report shall be prepared that considers up to 4 prestressed concrete options. Steel plate girder options will not be considered given the higher cost per square foot listed in the published ITD bridge type costs. The anticipated options are: • Option 1 —2-span prestressed concrete girder bridge with cast-in-place deck and MSE wall abutments. This option has shorter length, thinner height girders than option 2. • Option 2—2-span prestressed concrete girder bridge with cast-in-place deck and 2:1 fill slope abutments. This option will have longer length, deeper girder height than option 1 but eliminate the need for MSE walls. • Option 3 —2-span prestressed concrete deck bulb tee girder bridge with MSE wall abutments. This option is similar in length and configuration to Option 1. The deck bulb tee girders will allow for faster construction and have shorter length, thinner height girders than option 4. • Option 4—2-span prestressed concrete deck bulb tee girder bridge and 2:1 fill slope abutments. This option is similar in length and configuration to Option 2. The deck bulb tee girders will allow for faster construction and have longer length, deeper height girders than option 3. As part of the TS&L Report, prepare conceptual sketches of the 4 bridge options. The conceptual sketches will be basic S&L sheets. The plan views are anticipated to be outlines of the deck and piers with minimal dimensioning and detail (essentially outlines with no fine detailing). The elevation view will be similar with basic outline of the superstructure and approach fills/MSE walls with no fine detailing. A typical section of the bridge will also be included. 1 sheet per option is anticipated(total of 4 sheets). The conceptual sheets will be incorporated as an appendix into the report. After internal QAQC, the Draft TS&L Report will be submitted to ITD and ACHD for review and comment. Final TS&L Report—A review meeting will be held to discuss comments by ACHD and ITD on the Draft TS&L Report. After this meeting, the comments from ITD and ACHD will be incorporated, and a stamped Final TS&L Report will be submitted to ITD and ACHD for approval. Draft S&L Plans — Situation&Layout(S&L)plans will be prepared for the selected bridge alternative from the TS&L Report. The Preliminary S&L will be submitted for ITD and ACHD to review and comment. The anticipated sheet list is per the following table: Anticipated Bridge Sheet List for S&L Submittal Sheet Description # of Shts Situation and Layout 1 Sheet Index, Quantities, &Vicinity Map 1 Design and General Notes 1 Foundation Investigation (by Terracon) 2A MSE Wall Layout (if needed) 1 Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 15 of 35 Page ass KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES Pier Plan & Elevation 1 Typical Section & Details 1 Total Sheets = 6' Final S&L Plans —A review meeting will be held to discuss comments by ACHD and ITD on the Draft S&L plan set. After this meeting, the comments from ITD and ACHD will be incorporated, and a Final S&L plan set will be submitted to ITD and ACHD for approval. Approval of the Final S&L Plan set will constitute approval to start 95% design for ACHD (Final Bridge Design for ITD's process). Products and Deliverables • Draft TS&L Report • Final TS&L Report • Draft S&L Plan Submittal • Final S&L Plan Submittal ACHD Responsibilities • Review and Comment Assumptions • Perform a QC (check) and QA(Sr. Independent Review) of the TS&L Report and S&L Plans per ITD Bridge requirements and internal QAQC policies. • Up to 4 bridge alternates will be evaluated. • As this is a new crossing, the bridge will be constructed with no construction traffic accommodation and no need for any type of phased construction. • The Roadway designers will provide appropriate end terminals that tie into the bridge railings at the end of the bridge. No modification to ITD bridge railing standards is anticipated. • Horizontal and vertical alignment modeling and roadway related quantities for the TS&L and S&L submittals will be provided to roadway design team. Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 16 of 35 page 189 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES • I-84 roadway typical section, clear width, and height under the bridge is anticipated to be very similar to the recently constructed Cloverdale Overpass. • MSE wall configuration, if used, is anticipated to be similar to the recently constructed Cloverdale Overpass. • Terracon will provide a geotechnical report that meets the requirements of ITD's Geotechnical Engineering Report. Keller will provide the Foundation Investigation bridge plan sheets in accordance with ITD CAD standards. 4.4 Tenmile Creek and Kennedy Lateral Bridges ACHD has determined both structures will be precast concrete structures. The Kennedy Lateral and Tenmile Creek will be replace with concrete box and concrete stiff-leg structures. A Situation& Layout(S&L)plan set will be prepared for approval by ACHD. Draft S&L Plans — Situation&Layout(S&L)plans will be prepared for the in-kind structure. The Preliminary S&L will be submitted to the Irrigation District and ACHD for review and comment. The anticipated sheet list is per the following table: Anticipated Sheet List for S&L Submittal Sheet Description # of Shts Situation and Layout (Each Crossing) 2 Design and General Notes 1 Foundation Investigation (by Terracon) Tenmile Only 1 A Total Sheets by = 4' Final S&L Plans —A review meeting will be held to discuss comments by the Irrigation District and ACHD on the Draft S&L plan set. After this meeting, the comments from the Irrigation District and ACHD will be incorporated and a Final S&L plan set will be submitted ACHD for approval. Approval of the Final S&L Plan set will constitute approval to start 75% design for ACHD . Products and Deliverables • Contact reports for meetings with Irrigation Districts • Draft S&L Plan Submittal • Final S&L Plan Submittal ACHD Responsibilities • Review and Comment Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 17 of 35 page 190 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES Assumptions • No bridge alternates will be evaluated, replace in-kind. 4.5 Concept Roadway Design Design conceptual roadway geometry for the proposed improvements. Consultant will prepare roll plot of the concept design based on the typical section showing lane widths for approval by ACHD. Consultant will prepare two (2) alternatives, one that is centered about the sections line and the other one with the centerline shifted west of section line. Roll plots will identify concept level right-of-way impacts, utility impacts, and other design constraints of each alternative. Attend review meeting with ACHD to discuss the alternatives. Products and Deliverables • Plan view roll plots of roadway alternatives ACHD Responsibilities • Transmitting plans sets to project team. • Provide internal review of deliverables Assumptions • Preparing additional alignment and typical section alternative beyond this scope of work will be completed as additional services. • No roadway lanes will be added at the existing intersections except for adding a lane for the south leg of the Linder/Franklin intersection. 4.6 Traffic Precision will identify signal pole locations and mast arm lengths at the intersections and ensure sufficient right-of-way is provided to meet ADA requirements. Keller will prepare a traffic operations report for the intersections of Linder Rd and Overland Rd, and Linder Rd and Franklin Rd. Use existing intersection counts and COMPASS travel demand model output to calculate opening-year and forecast-year turning movement projections by the Furness Method. Use Synchro to calculate delay, levels of service, and required turn bay lengths. Prepare the traffic report in technical memorandum format. Products and Deliverables • Draft Traffic Report • Final Traffic Report ACHD Responsibilities • Provide COMPASS travel demand model projections for calibration year and forecast year(model runs with Linder Road overpass included) • Provide existing traffic counts and acquire new counts as ACHD determines necessary. Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 18 of 35 page 191 KELLER ' Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES Assumptions • Neither signal warrant nor roundabout analyses will be needed since the traffic signal and PHB locations are already established. L2 will provide the existing AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement counts at each major intersection, 24-hour directional counts at each intersection leg and vehicle classifications where possible. 4.7 Hydraulic/Stormwater Design Project designs to comply with the Clean Water Act,NPDES requirements and the currently approved ACHD Section 8000 Stormwater policy and Section 8200 Stormwater Design Manual. All projects should use the GSI Guidance Manual to determine the feasibility of GSI for the project area. Consultant will depict the findings of the preliminary stormwater analysis on a roll plot as part of the 30% design review package. Storm sewer networks, surface collection and discharge facilities, inlets, and culverts will be depicted on the plans. Stormwater report to be included in Task 5.3. The plans will include: • Topographic map of existing contours • Existing surface water features • Existing stormwater and irrigation conveyance features within the project limits Tenmile Creek Hydrologic/Hydraulic Analysis Use existing FIRM map and study, obtain existing HEC-RAS model from the City and re-model with the proposed replacement structure. Prepare a no-rise certificate and floodplain development permit. Kennedy Lateral Hydraulic Analysis Nampa Meridian will provide the required flow. Use HY-8 to model the flows and size the structure. Products and Deliverables • Preliminary Stormwater layout ACHD Responsibilities • Review and Comment • Review and approve all contact with irrigation districts Assumptions • Detailed drawings will not be prepared • HEC-RAS electronic files will be provided by City of Meridian Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 19 of 35 page 192 KELLER &--ara r. Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES 4.8 Irrigation Facilities Gravity irrigation conveyance systems exist on both sides of Linder Road for much, if not all, of the portion north of Interstate 84 to Franklin Road. The existing systems are old and in various levels of disrepair but seemingly still functional. Irrigation water is supplied by one or more irrigation canals and may flow north or south depending on the location along Linder Road. There are large, inverted siphon pipes in areas that connect irrigation box to irrigation box. Developed subdivisions on the east side of Linder Road would likely have pump stations supplied by this irrigation network. Shallower distribution pipes and ditches provide service to individual parcels on the west side of Linder Road. Gravity irrigation coordination and design will require communication with the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District to fully understand the supply and distribution parameters of the existing systems. Coordination with individual property owners may be necessary for design of the new system. Preparation of separate gravity irrigation plan and profile sheets is not included in this scope.. Consultant shall complete an inventory of the existing irrigation facilities within the project limits and participate in a site visit with the appropriate irrigation district personnel. Consultant to identify drains and canals within project limits by onsite investigation and evaluation. Products and Deliverables • Irrigation District Site Visit Summary, PDF copy. • Inventory of existing irrigation systems included with the 75% design review package. ACHD Responsibilities • Conduct all contact with irrigation districts or approve Consultant to make contact. Assumptions • One (1) Consultant staff will attend site visit with irrigation district, assume two (2) hours for visit and travel. • Irrigation districts or owners will provide design flows and maximum flows for their facilities to be used in design. Will also provide dates the water should be out of the facilities to allow construction. • An irrigation report will not be required. • Irrigation facilities will be shown on plan and profile sheets. • The existing irrigation pump station east of Linder and at the north side of I-84 will not be relocated. Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 20 of 35 page 193 KELLER &__ara r. Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES 4.9 Environmental Evaluation Cultural Resources Conduct background research and cultural resources field survey; prepare an Archaeological and Historical Survey Report (AHSR)to assist compliance with Section 106. The Cultural Resources Survey will include background research, field survey and preparation of an archaeological and historic survey report. Sites Record Search and Literature Review will include request of a site record search from the Idaho State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) regarding the project Area of Potential Effect(APE). This is a records review for previously recorded historic and prehistoric sites identified by the SHPO within a half mile of the project corridor. Conduct research in city and county records for information pertaining to prehistoric and historic properties within the APE. Field Investigation and Intensive Survey Conduct a field investigation for prehistoric and historic archaeological resources over the project area to identify, record, and evaluate cultural resources in or abutting the project APE and to evaluate their eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The intensive-level survey will be conducted in accordance with the standards of the Idaho State Historic Sites Inventory Manual and the Idaho Historic Sites Inventory Automated Database: Manual of Instruction for Data Entry. Archaeological and Historic Survey Report (AHSR) Prepare an AHSR that includes a discussion of pre-field research, field methods, survey results, and cultural resource survey maps. The AHSR will identify prehistoric and historic cultural properties, recommend NHRP eligibility and assess the project's effect on each. A draft report will be submitted for review and comment and then a final report will be submitted to ACHD, who will coordinate with SHPO for concurrence. Deliverables AHSR report for submittal to ACHD with PDF of report, site forms, GIS shape files, raw digital photos and ISHI database. ACHD Responsibilities • Identify parcels which will be impacted by the installation of any storm water controls. Assumptions • This scope of work will meet the requirements of the EPA Appendix E-Historic Property Screening Process. • This scope of work will meet the requirements of Joint Application Submittal. • In an effort to save time and costs, the environmental evaluation for the roadway project will be combined in the same report as the intersection companion project's report. Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 21 of 35 page 194 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES • Historic sites documentation will include Tenmile and Kennedy Lateral and up to three historic architectural sites. Aquatic Resource Delineation All such waters and wetlands will be mapped and delineated according to the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Manual. A. Background Research. Conduct and compile background information on aquatic resources from existing data sources such as U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory maps, topographic maps, aerial photographs, soil surveys, and previous studies conducted. B. Aquatic Resource Survey and Delineation. Conduct formal wetland surveys and delineation of all wetlands within the project area. Include the data (wetland polygons, soil pits, streams/irrigation features, and bridge tie in locations) in a layer that can be utilized in the environmental GIS. C. Wetland Data Forms. As required for inclusion in the Aquatic Resource Delineation Report, wetland data forms will be completed for each wetland delineated in the field. Wetland information will be recorded on the appropriate regional supplement. D. Wetland Mapping/GIS. The Aquatic Resource Delineation Report will include vicinity map and aerial photographs of the project area with identified waters and wetlands clearly shown. Data collected in the field (including waters, wetlands, soil pits, and bridge structures over waters) will be provided to the client for incorporation into project files. E. Aquatic Resource Delineation Report. Prepare an Aquatic Resource Delineation Report describing the methods used, jurisdictional and non jurisdictional wetlands identified, and general characteristics of vegetation, soil, and hydrology in the vicinity. In addition, site photographs of each water and wetland identified will be included in a separate appendix. A Preliminary Aquatic Delineation Report will be prepared and submitted to ACHD for review. All issues and comments will be addressed and resubmitted. The Draft Aquatic Resource Delineation Report will then be forwarded by ACHD on to U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) for review and comment. After all comments have been addressed, a Final Aquatic Resource Delineation Report will be submitted to USACE for issuance of the Jurisdictional Determination. F. Technical Review QA/QC. Prior to submitting any aquatic resource delineation documents, internal QA/QC shall be completed by Bionomics staff. G. Comment Response. The draft report will be submitted to the client and ACHD will submit USACE for review. Comments will be addressed, and the revised report will be resubmitted for review and concurrence. Should either agency staff require report edits or revisions of the project area,the review cycle for each is renewed at the time of the submitted report changes. H. Coordination and Consultation. Personal and telephone meetings will be held and documented throughout the duration of the project. Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 22 of 35 page 195 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES Minimum Deliverables • Aquatic Resource Delineation Data • Draft Aquatic Resource Delineation Report • Final Aquatic Resource Delineation Report Assumptions • The Aquatic Resource Survey and Delineation will be completed during the growing season(approximately May— September) as required by the USACE. • This scope of work does not include potential mitigation. Joint Permit Application The consultant shall prepare the application for a joint permit including application, narrative, graphics with dimensions, quantities, ordinary high-water mark,plan and cross sections as needed per current guidelines. Pages shall be numbered and labeled with appropriate title blocks. Preparation of the application shall follow the current Joint Applications for Permits —Applicant Information Guide. Assumptions • This scope of work assumes a Nationwide Permit will be completed. If an individual permit is necessary, a new scope of work will be necessary to complete those services. • Plan and cross section layouts to support the application will be prepared by Keller. In addition, Keller will assist Bionomics in determining the quantity of impacts associated. Minimum Deliverables • Draft Joint Permit Application • Final Joint Permit Application 4.10 30% Design Submittal This task includes performing an internal review of all deliverables and preparing the submittal documents. The Consultant will deliver one paper and one PDF copy. Products and Deliverables • All deliverables will be uploaded to ACHD's PWA site o PWA File Folder: 13 30 Percent Design-CPD20/Design Submittal-CPD20.20 • Roll Plot style PDF with typical section o Including utilities in color(use ITD standards)—At Utility Coordinator's Direction • Request for design exceptions • Cultural/Historic/Threatened& Endangered Species Memo[ • 30% Cost Estimate on the ACHD Spreadsheet and uploaded into 132W per ACHD User Guide Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 23 of 35 page 196 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES • 30%ROW Required Square Footage (ROW, TE, PE) in Excel • PDFs of all deliverables (no hard copies of any deliverable required) • All native files including CAD files (insert and bind all x-refs into one CAD file) ACHD Responsibilities • Transmitting plan sets to project team • Perform internal review of all deliverables • Utilize BlueBeam for the review Assumptions • The engineer will adhere to the ISPWC item number process, as well as the Special Provisions (SP), and ACHD's Standard Special Provisions (SSP). 4.11 30% Review Meeting Products and Deliverables • Review Meeting Notes • Maintain Comment/Response Matrix ACHD Responsibilities • Schedule and Host Meeting • Provide Comments—One (1)week prior to the meeting Assumptions • ACHD will complete the review within two (2) weeks of receiving the 30%Design Submittal. 5.0 75% DESIGN The minimum information required on a 75% design review plans shall show existing facilities/features, locations, and general design features of planned facilities. This includes but is not limited to line and grade and other related items that will affect project design. These plans should be at 75% complete at minimum. Products and Deliverables • Utility conflict evaluation • Potholing. This scope of work assumes 24 potholes will be required. Additional potholing will be provided as a supplemental service. • Pothole location map—to be reviewed and approved by ACHD Utility Coordinator prior to potholing commencing. Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 24 of 35 page 197 KELLER &__ara r. Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES 5.1 75% Traffic Signal Design Precision will conduct traffic signal field inventories and design the initial layout of the traffic signals at the Linder Rd/Overland Rd and Linder Rd/Franklin Rd intersections. The design will also include two (2) PHB signals located on Linder Rd at the Tenmile Creek path crossing and the intersection of Waltman St. The plans will be drafted showing new signal poles, mast arms, and luminaires as necessary for the proposed improvements 5.2 Roadway Design The minimum information on the 75% design review plans to show existing facilities/features and location and general design feature of planned improvements. 5.3 Hydraulic/Stormwater Design Stormwater Calculations Consultant will use the preliminary information from Task 4.7 and advance calculations, including delineating existing, pre-development drainage basins, identifying post-development drainage basins, hydrologic values, inlet spread and capture for each inlet structure, seepage bed sizes and locations, and estimate pipe sizes and culvert sizes for minor crossings for the selected option. The drainage infrastructure will be designed in compliance with ACHD standards Stormwater Report Consultant will prepare the Draft Stormwater Report, including Design Life and Cost Analysis, for submittal to ACHD. After ACHD's review, Consultant will address all comments received and prepare the Final Stormwater Report. 5.4 Gravity Irrigation Show the existing and proposed irrigation facilities. 5.5 Signing, Pavement Marking, Illumination Consultant will develop signing and pavement marking plans in accordance with MUTCD and applicable state and local laws and ordinances. Consultant will develop illumination plans for the project, including continuous approach lighting on Linder Rd outside of the ITD bridge per ANSI/IES RP-8-14 and identifying a power source with Idaho Power. Consultant will design the interconnect improvements and coordinate with ACHD Congestion Management. ACHD Responsibilities • ACHD will coordinate and verify electrical service locations,beacons, and illumination with Idaho Power. 5.6 Agency and Utility Coordination Consultant will coordinate with affected utility companies and appropriate agencies. Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 25 of 35 page 198 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES Requirements for Agency Agreements Consultant will identify potentially needed cooperative agreements to address maintenance of landscaping,waterway crossings, design considerations, and other issues. Consultant will discuss tentative agreement with these agencies in cooperation with ACHD. Consultant will develop exhibits for interagency agreements. Products and Deliverables • Exhibits (2) for cooperative agreements, PDF copy ACHD Responsibilities • ACHD will set up and participate in meetings with all agencies regarding cooperative agreements. 5.7 Utility Plans Consultant shall include existing utility information on the plans. Consultant will also review horizontal field survey designating subsurface utilities to the extent known as well as utility location updates. Consultant will prepare final utility plans showing the locations of existing utilities and identifying conflicts. Design of relocated utilities will be provided by the utility owner if the utility is within the ROW. Separate final utility plans will be prepared in color. Letter(s) and final utility plans will be prepared and submitted to the utility companies for review approval. ACHD and ITD will be copied on all correspondence with the utility companies. Products and Deliverables • Utility locations in base mapping • Utility Plans, PDF copy Assumptions • Design of relocated utilities will be provided by utility owner if located within the ROW. • ACHD will prepare utility waivers and/or final utility agreements, if required. • Estimates of work will be provided by utility owner. 5.8 Temporary Traffic Control Consultant will develop temporary traffic control plans for both Linder Road and I-84. Scope based on keeping the same number of existing lanes open during construction. 5.9 Pedestrian Detour Plan Consultant will develop the temporary pedestrian detour plans. Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 26 of 35 page 199 KELLER &--ara r. Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES 5.10 Quantities and Construction Estimate Team will tabulate quantities and prepare 75% construction estimates for the project. 5.11 75% Design Submittal This task includes performing an internal review of all deliverables and preparing the submittal documents. Deliverable shall be in PDF format and set up a BlueBlue review session ACHD Responsibilities • Transmitting plan sets to irrigation districts, utility companies, and local agencies. • Perform internal review of all deliverables in BlueBeam. Products and Deliverables • All deliverables will be uploaded to ACHD's PWA site o PWA File Folder: 14 75 Percent Design-CPD90/Preliminary Design Submittal- CPD90.10 • Title Sheet • Typical Sections (4 sheets) • Roadway Plan and Profile Sheets—Including stormwater/irrigation profiles and pothole information(30 sheets) o Include measurement on roadway plans from structure to new ROW line if less than 20' • Total Ownership Map • Total Ownership Table • Signal Plan Sheets (6 sheets) o Consult with Utility Coordinator regarding power supply • Signal Interconnect&Lighting Plans—Including ITS (15 sheets) o Consult with Utility Coordinator regarding power supply • Signing and Pavement Marking Sheets (15 sheets) • General Construction Staging/Phasing Plans/Utility Phasing Plans, (8 sheets) • Advanced Construction Signing (2 sheets) • Temporary Pedestrian Plans (2 sheets) • I-84 Temporary Traffic Control Plans (25 sheets) • I-84 Typical Section(1 sheet) • I-84 Plans Sheets (2 sheets) • I-84 Barrier Details (1 sheet) • Concrete Joint Details (1 sheet) • MSE Wall (Roadway) (12 sheets) • Tenmile Structure (8 sheets) • Kennedy Lateral Structure (8 sheets) • 75%Utility Plans (use ITD standards) (15 sheets) Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 27 of 35 page 200 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES • 75% Cost Estimate on the ACHD Spreadsheet and uploaded into B2W per ACHD User Guide • Cultural/Historic/Threatened& Endangered Species Memo • 75%ROW Required Square Footage (ROW Fee, TE, PE)by Parcel (ROW Requirements Table)—on plans and Excel • PDF's of all deliverables—PDF plans need to be to scale at 11"x17" o No hard copies of any deliverable required • All native files including One CAD File (insert and bind all x-refs into One CAD File) Assumptions • The engineer will adhere to the ISPWC item number process, as well as the Special Provisions (SP), and ACHD's Standard Special Provisions (SSP) for roadway work and ITD item number process, as well as the Special Provisions (SP), and ITD's Standard Special Provisions (SSP) for overpass bridge and I-84 work. 5.12 75% Review Meeting ACHD will provide comments and the review plan sets to the Consultant prior to the meeting. The Consultant shall compile comments on the Comment/Response Matrix and send draft to Project Manager prior to the meeting. The Consultant will attend the 75%Design Review meeting to discuss review comments. ACHD will make final decisions for conflicting review comments. Consultant will complete the Comment/Response Matrix after the 75% Design Review and submit to ACHD. The Consultant will attend a plan-in-hand field review meeting and prepare notes summarizing field review comments and decisions made. Products and Deliverables • Review Meeting Minutes/Notes • Maintain Comment/Response Matrix • Plan-in-Hand Field Review Meeting Notes ACHD Responsibilities • Schedule and host Plan-in-Hand meeting • Schedule and host Meeting • Provide Comments—One (1)week prior to the meeting Assumptions • ACHD will complete the review within three (3)weeks of receiving the 75% Design Submittal Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 28 of 35 Page 201 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES 6.0 95% DESIGN 6.1 Roadway Design Team will make modifications based on the 75% design review comments and prepare the 95% design. Roadway cross sections at 50-foot interval will be shown and include elevation changes at each driveway. 6.2 95% Design Submittal This task includes performing an internal review of all deliverables and preparing the submittal documents. Deliverable shall be in PDF or electronic format. ACHD will be responsible for transmitting plan sets to irrigation districts,utility companies, and local agencies. Plans Number of Sheets Title Sheet 1 Total Ownership Map 2 Vicinity Map/Survey MaplSurvey Control 8 Roadway Plan 15 &Profile 15 30 Intersection Details 10 Roadway Details 10 Drainage Details 2 Pond Details 4 SWPP Plans 8 Signing&Pavement Marking Plans 15 Sign Details 2 Traffic Signal Material Quantities 2 Traffic Signal Plans 12 Illumination Material Quantities 2 Illumination Plans 15 Illumination Details 2 Construction Staging Plans 4 Tra is Control Plans Linder Rd 10 Traffic Control Plans I-84 25 I-84 Plan Sheets 2 Concrete Joint Details I I-84 Typical Section 1 I-84 Barrier Details I Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 29 of 35 Page 202 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES Utility Plans 30 MSE Plans 12 Kennedy Lateral Plans 8 Tenmile Creek Plans 8 Project Control W/Mon Perpetuation) 4 ROW Plans 17 Linder Overpass Bridge Plans shown below 33 Total Sheet Count 281 Products and Deliverables • All deliverables will be uploaded to ACHD's PWA site o PWA File Folder: 15 95 Percent Design-CPD50/Draft Final Design Submittal- CPD5 0.10 • Title Sheet • Typical Sections • Roadway Plan and Profile Sheets • Approach/Driveway Profile Sheets • Detail Sheets • Stormwater Plan and Profile Sheets o Including pond revegetation as outlined in the Stormwater Management Pond Revegetation Guidance Manual • Irrigation Profiles • Structure Plans (other than the I84 Overpass Bridge) o Initial Load Rating in accordance with ITD LRFD Design Manual Article 0.03. If the 2 canal crossings are precast structures, the load rating shall be done after shop drawings are approved. If the 2 canal crossings are cast-in-place structures, the initial load rating shall be done at the 95% design submittal. 0 • I84 Overpass Bridge Plans o Final Design Structure Plans and Calculations: Design calculations shall be prepared on 8%2"xI 1" sheets and shall be numbered and indexed. Plans shall be prepared in accordance with the guidelines of the ITD Bridge Design LRFD Manual. Forsgren will utilize a check print process to check design calcs and plan sheets as part of this task. Plans and Calculations shall be submitted to the ITD Bridge Section and ACHD for review. The following bridge sheets are anticipated: Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 30 of 35 Page 203 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES I-84 Overpass Bridge Sheet List Plan Sheet Type No. of Sheets Situation&Layout 1 Sheet Index, Quantities, &Vicinity Map 1 Design&General Notes 1 Foundation Investigation 2 Footing Layout&Pile Notes 1 Abutment Details 3 MSE Wall Details 2 Pier Details 5 Girder Framing Plan 1 Deck Typical Section&Details 2 Prestressed Girder Sheet 1 Prestressed Girder Details 1 Future Utility Details(power&communication) 1 Approach Slab Details 2 42" Single Slope Concrete Parapet 1 Concrete Parapet for Combination Railing 2 Protective Pedestrian Fence for Comb Rail 2 Combination Rail Light Pole Support 1 Bridge Name Signage 1 Date Panel 1 Metal Reinforcement 1 Total Bridge Plan Sheets 33 o Assumptions for I-84 Overpass Bridge Design: ■ Bridge will be a 2 span prestressed girder bridge with cast-in-place concrete deck. MSE walls will be utilized at the abutments and span lengths will be approximately 96 feet(similar to the recent Cloverdale Overpass). ■ Substructure foundations will consist of a single pier on spread footing and integral abutments with a single row of piles in CMPs through the MSE walls. ■ Bridge will have no skew,be on a horizontal tangent section, and have a constant width from one end to the other. ■ No phased construction needed ■ No raised sidewalk ■ Prestressed girder depth will be less than 66 inches and temporary diaphragms will not be required. ■ Permanent metal deck forms will not be utilized. Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 31 of 35 Page 204 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES ■ Grade or vertical curvature will be sufficient to keep drainage spread minimized to avoid the need for deck drainage system on the bridge. All drainage from deck will be captured by inlets located off the bridge. Drainage design across the bridge and for any storm drainage will be provided by others. ■ Conduits for future power and communication utilities will be provided via 4 inch conduits carried between girders on both sides of the bridge (likely located within the 1 st or 2nd interior girder bays). ■ No water, sewer, gas, or other large utilities are anticipated. ■ Seismic zone is anticipated to be zone 1, with no seismic analysis required. o Deliverables for I-84 Overpass Bridge Design ■ Final Structure Plans on I Ix17 (PDF) ■ Final Design Calculations (PDF) ■ Construction Time ■ Special Provisions ■ Quantities ■ Cost Estimate ■ Initial Load Rating in accordance with ITD LRFD Design Manual Article 0.03 for the 1-84 Bridge. • Signal Plans and Detail Sheets o Sub-consult with Utility Coordinator regarding power supply o Precision will prepare the use tax tables for the signal materials • Signal Interconnect and Lighting Plans o Consult with Utility Coordinator regarding power supply • Signing and Striping Sheets • Temporary Traffic Control Plan(including bicycle,pedestrian, and transit facilities) • Pedestrian Temporary Traffic Control • General Construction Staging/Phasing Plans/Utility Phasing Plans, if required • Advanced Construction Signing • SWPPP • 95%Utility Plans (use ITD standards) • Special Provisions • 95% Cost Estimate on the ACHD Spreadsheet and uploaded into 132W per ACHD User Guide • 95% Color ROW Plans o Include measurement from structure to new ROW line if less than 20' • 95% ROW Required Square Footage (ROW Fee, TE, PE)by Parcel (ROW Requirements Table)—on plans and Excel • List on the plans, in table form, all monuments found within the project limits, identifying Station and Offset from control line and monument type found(I.C. 55-1613). Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 32 of 35 Page 205 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES • List on the plans, in table form, all calibration points, including northing, easting, elevation and monument type. • Show on the plan sheets, the locations of TBM's and provide TBM information(Station, Offset,Northing, Easting, Elevation, and monument type). • 95% Stormwater Report (including calculations & Runoff Reduction Feasibility Analysis Documentation Form as required) • 75% design Plans and estimate with ACHD comments • 75% Comment/Response Matrix • PDFs of all deliverables in BlueBeam—PDF plans need to be to scale at 11"x17" o No hard copies of any deliverable required • All native files including One CAD File (insert and bind all x-refs into One CAD File) Assumptions The engineer will adhere to the ISPWC item number process, as well as the Special Provisions (SP), and ACHD's Standard Special Provisions (SSP) for the roadway work and ITD item number process, Special Provisions (SP), and Standard Special Provisions (SSP) for the bridge and I-84 work. 6.3 95% Review Meeting Products and Deliverables • Review Meeting Minutes/Notes • Maintain Comment/Response Matrix ACHD Responsibilities • Schedule and host Meeting • Provide Comments—One (1)week prior to the meeting in BlueBeam. Assumptions • ACHD will complete the review within two (2) weeks of receiving the 95%Design Submittal 7.0 99% DESIGN SUBMITTAL The Consultant will incorporate comments from the 95% Design review meeting into the 99% Design submittal documents and perform an internal review. The plans will be finalized for Right of Way acquisition and legal descriptions and accompanying sketches will be prepared. The Consultant will provide support during Right of Way acquisition and make changes to construction and right of way plans as requested by ACHD Project Manager. Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 33 of 35 Page 206 KELLER &--ara r. Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES 7.1 Finalize Plans for Right of Way Acquisition Products and Deliverables • All deliverables will be uploaded to ACHD's PWA site o PWA File Folder: 16 99 Percent Designl-CPD65 • -84 Overpass Bridge Plans package to meet ITD Bridge PS&E requirements will include the following: o I-84 Overpass Bridge plans (33 sheets) signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Idaho. o Final Structure Plans (33 sheets) on 11x17 (PDF) signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Idaho. o Final design Calculations (PDF) signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Idaho. o Construction Time o Special Provisions o Quantities o Cost Estimate o Load Rating based on the 99% (ITD PS&E)plans will be performed and submitted with the submittal in accordance with the ITD Bridge Design Manual Art. 0.03. • l l"x17" color Right of Way plans (17 sheets), signed and sealed by a Professional Land Surveyor registered in the State of Idaho; o Parcels which have acquisition(s), ROW plans shall show the station and offset of each angle point of the acquisition, including angle points along the existing ROW and at the intersections with property lines of the affected property. • 99%ROW Required Square Footage (ROW Fee, TE, PE)by Parcel (ROW Requirements Table)—on plans and Excel o Include column for subproject numbers in ROW table if applicable. • PDF of construction plans (281 sheets) signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Idaho—PDF plans need to be to scale at 11"x 17". • PDF of color Right of-Way plans (15 sheets), signed and sealed by a Professional Land Surveyor registered in the State of Idaho—PDF plans need to be to scale at 11"x17". • One PDF set of legal descriptions with exhibits for takes and permanent easements, signed and sealed by a Professional Land Surveyor registered in the State of Idaho. • ACHD ROW Checklist • One PDF set of cross sections to include elevation changes at each driveway. • PDF Special Provisions, signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Idaho • Completed"ACHD Supplied SWPPP Information" • List on the plans, in table form, all monuments found within the project limits, identifying Station and Offset from control line and monument type found (I.C. 55-1613). Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 34 of 35 Page 207 KELLER Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Scope of Work ASSOCIATES • List on the plans, in table form, all calibration points, including northing, easting, elevation and monument type. • Show on the plan sheets, the locations of TBM's and provide TBM information(Station, Offset,Northing, Easting, Elevation and monument type). • 99% Cost Estimate on the ACHD Spreadsheet and uploaded into B2W per ACHD User Guide • 95%Design plans and reports with ACHD comments • 95% Comment/Response Matrix • 95%Right of Way Plans with ACHD comments • All final permits • PDFs of all deliverables—no hard copies of any deliverable required • All native files including One CAD File (insert and bind all x-refs into One CAD File) • Contingency Item: Design support during ROW acquisition Assumptions The engineer will adhere to the ISPWC item number process, as well as the Special Provisions (SP), and ACHD's Standard Special Provisions (SSP)for the roadway work and ITD item number process, Special Provisions (SP), and Standard Special Provisions (SSP) for the overpass bridge and 1-84 work. 8.0 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING This task addresses engineering support during the construction phases of the project and the record of survey which occurs after construction is complete. This work is not included in this contract and will be included in a separate contract if required. Ada County Highway District Keller Associates Linder Road, Overland to Franklin May 11, 2022 ACHD Project No. 522038 ACHD GIS No. Page 35 of 35 Page 2os EE Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Keller Associates Labor Estimate QA/QC Project Project Designers Surveyor Survey Clerical Total %Total Work Tasks Manager Engineers PLS Tech Hours Hours 1.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS 1.1 Progress Meetings Progress Meetings 40 40 4 84 Meridian Task Force Meeting 12 2 14 1.2 Project Administration Monthly Invoicing 4 18 14 36 Monthly Progress Report and Schedule 4 9 13 Internal Coordination Meetings and Admin. 5 18 36 8 5 72 Coordination with Team-Every month 5 36 36 4 81 1.3 ACHD Standards 1 2 2 Sub-Total 18 133 114 8 9 0 20 302 3.19% 2.0 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 2.1 Outreach(Not in scope of work) 2.2 Virtual Public Meetings(30%&75%) Prepare Exhibits(ArcGIS Storymap) 3 24 28 32 4 91 Attend Meetings 6 6 12 Meeting Notes 2 12 4 18 Sub-Total 3 1 32 46 1 32 1 0 1 0 1 8 121 1 1.28% 3.0 LOCATION SURVEYING AND MAPPING 3.1 Project Control 4 12 40 40 1 97.0 3.2 Boundary Survey,Monument Preservation,Legal Descriptions 40 12 16 40 120 180 4 412.0 3.3 Topographic Survey &Base Map(Utilities,Irrigation,Drainage) 4 12 24 50 2 92.0 Sub-Total 40 20 40 40 184 270 7 601 6.35% 4.0 30%DESIGN FF 4.1 Geotechnical Investigation 4 8 16 28 4.2 Not Used 4.3 I-84 Overpass Bridge Alternative Study 16 16 12 44 4.4 Tenmile Creek and Kennedy Lateral Bridges 6 8 32 32 78 4.5 Concept Roadway Design Develop the Design for Two Alternatives 8 32 60 80 180 Roll Plots with Typical Sections 4 16 24 44 Cultural/Historic/Threatened&Endangered Species Memo 2 4 2 2 10 30%Cost Estimate 2 12 6 20 30%ROW Required Square Footage in Excel 2 4 12 18 4.6 Traffic 0 Traffic Operations Report Linder/Overland 4 70 12 86 Traffic Operations Report Linder/Franklin 4 70 12 86 4.7 Hydraulic/Stormwater Design 4 12 68 24 2 110 4.8 Irrigation Facilities 4 32 12 2 50 4.9 Environmental Evaluation 6 4 2 12 4.10 30%Design Submittal Internal Review and Prepare Submittal 32 8 16 8 2 66 4.11 30%Review Meeting 1 8 1 4 1 4 1 1 1 2 18 Sub-Total 66 114 410 232 4 12 12 850 8.98% 5.0 75%DESIGN 5.1 75%Traffic Signal Design 4 6 4 14 5.2 Roadway Design(113 sheets) Prepare Roadway Design 50 40 90 Title Sheet 3 3 Typical Section(4 sheets) 4 16 32 52 Roadway Plan and Profile Sheets—(30 sheets) 24 160 240 424 Total Ownership Map 6 12 18 Project Control(1 Sheet) 6 8 12 26 75%ROW Required Square Footage on Plans and Excel 4 4 14 22 Signal Plan Sheets(6 sheets) 1 4 5 1-84 Typical Section(1 sheet) 4 8 12 1-84 Plans(2 sheets) 1 8 16 25 1-84 Barrier Details(1 sheet) 4 8 12 Concrete Joint Details(1 sheet) 2 6 8 MSE Wall(Roadway Plans)(12 sheets) 4 48 56 108 Tenmile Creek Structure 2 32 20 54 Kennedy Lateral Structure 1 12 8 21 5.3 Hydraulic/Stormwater Design 12 60 32 104 Page 209 EE Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Keller Associates Labor Estimate ML QA/QC Project Project Designers Surveyor Survey Clerical Total %Total Work Tasks Manager Engineers PLS Tech Hours Hours 5.4 Gravity Irrigation 12 48 24 84 5.5 Signing,Pavement Marking,Illumination(15 Sheets) 4 32 48 84 5.6 Agency and Utility Coordination 12 28 1 41 5.7 Utility Plans(15 Sheets) 3 12 24 1 11 40 5.8 Temporary Traffic Control Linder Road(12 Sheets) 8 24 24 56 1-84(25 Sheets) 48 160 120 328 5.9 Pedestrian Detour Plan 1 8 8 17 5.10 Quantities and Construction Estimate 6 24 16 46 5.11 75%Design Submittal 0 Internal Review and Prepare Submittals 60 32 24 4 120 Plan-in-hand field review and meeting notes 8 4 4 2 18 5.12 75%Review Meeting 8 4 4 2 18 Sub-Total 60 195 770 756 21 38 10 1850 19.55% 6.0 95%DESIGN 6.1 Roadway Design Update Roadway Design 4 10 24 38 Title Sheet 2 2 Total Ownership Map(2 Sheets) 12 12 24 Vicinity Map/Survey Control(8 Sheets) 4 12 8 16 40 Roadway Plan(15 Sheets)&Profile(15 Sheets) 30 100 180 8 8 326 Intersection Details(10 sheets) 6 16 24 46 Roadway Details(10 Sheets) 12 24 48 84 Drainage Details(2 Sheets) 4 18 12 34 Pond Details(4 Sheets) 6 24 36 66 SWPP Plans(8 Sheets) 2 8 16 26 Signing&Pavement Marking Plans(15 Sheets) 6 16 32 54 Sign Details(2 Sheets) 4 14 18 Traffic Signal Material Quantities(2 Sheets) 1 1 Traffic Signal Plans(12 Sheets) 1 1 Illumination Material Quantities(2 Sheets) 4 12 16 Illumination Plans(15 Sheets) 12 28 40 Illumination Details(2 Sheets) 3 6 9 Construction Staging Plans(4 Sheets) 4 8 24 36 Traffic Control Plans(Linder Rd, 10 Sheets) 6 24 32 62 Traffic Control Plans(1-84,25 sheets) 24 68 96 188 1-84 Plan Sheets(2 Sheets) 1 8 16 25 Concrete Joint Details(1 Sheet) 1 2 3 1-84 Typical Section(1 Sheet) 1 2 3 1-84 Barrier Details(1 Sheet) 1 3 4 Utility Plans(30 Sheets) 4 12 16 32 MSE Wall(Roadway, 12 Sheets) 8 40 48 96 Tenmile Creek Plans 4 20 30 54 Kennedy Lateral Plans 1 6 10 17 Project Control W/Mon Perpetuation(4 Sheets) 8 16 16 40 ROW Plans(17 Sheets) 8 16 32 42 24 122 Linder Road Overpass Bridge 32 8 12 8 60 6.2 95%Design Submittal Internal Review and Prepare Submittal 40 16 24 8 16 16 120 6.3 95%Review Meeting and Notes Prepare for and Attend Meeting,Take Notes 6 8 14 Summarize Comments and Prepare Responses 4 4 2 10 Sub-Total 72 166 496 781 102 92 2 Jill 18.08% Page 210 EE Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Keller Associates Labor Estimate QA/QC Project Project Designers Surveyor Survey Clerical Total %Total Work Tasks I Manager Engineers) PLS Tech Hours Hours 7.0 99%DESIGN 7.1 Finalize Plans for Right-of-Way Acquisition 30 40 120 100 20 20 4 334 Sub-Total 30 40 120 100 20 20 4 334 3.53% 100%BID DOCUMENTS-To be included later if needed Sub-Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.0 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING-To be included later Sub-Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES AS NEEDED-To be included later if needed Sub-Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL 289 700 1996 1949 340 432 63 5769 60.96% 5.0% 12.1% 34.6% 33.8% 5.9% 7.5% 1.1% Terracon 439 4.64% Precision 582 6.15% Forsgren 2,386 25.21% Bionomics 288 3.04% Subconsultant Sub-Total Hours 3,695 39.04"/u Total Labor Hours 9,464 100.000/6 Page 211 Item#9. CONSULTANT NAME: Keller Associates, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Linder Road, Overland to Franklin A. SUMMARY ESTIMATED LABOR COSTS Raw Labor Man-Days Man-Hours Hrly Rate Cost Principal/QC 36.13 = 289.00 @ $63.97 = $ 18,487.33 Project Manager 87.50 = 700.00 @ $63.80 = $ 44,660.00 Project Engineers 249.50 = 1996.00 @ $46.66 = $ 93,133.36 Designers 243.63 = 1949.00 @ $48.90 = $ 95,306.10 Surveyor PLS 42.50 = 340.00 @ $49.10 = $ 16,694.00 Survey Technician 54.00 = 432.00 @ $39.75 = $ 17,172.00 Clerical 7.88 = 63.00 @ $23.17 = $ 1,459.71 TOTAL RAW LABOR COST = $286,912.50 B. PAYROLL, FRINGE BENEFIT COSTS &OVERHEAD Total Raw Labor Cost Approved Rate $286,912.50 X 171.26% = $ 491,366.35 C. NET FEE Total Raw Labor&Overhead NET FEE $778,278.85 X 12.5% = $ 97,284.86 SUB-TOTAL(A+B+C) = $ 875,563.70 D. OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSE SUMMARY Estimated Estimated Amount Unit Cost Expense 1 MILEAGE(miles) 1600 @ $ 0.585 = $ 936.00 2 AIR TRAVEL 0 @ $ 300.00 = $ - 3 LODGING(Days) 5 @ $ 147.00 = $ 735.00 4 MEALS(ME&I Days) 5 @ $ 74.00 = $ 370.00 5 CAR RENTAL 0 @ $ - = $ - 6 CAR RENTAL FUEL 0 @ $ = $ 7 EXTERNAL PRINTING 0 @ $ = $ 8 TITLE REPORTS 0 @ $ = $ 9 SURVEY TRAFFIC CONTOL 0 @ $ = $ 10 3D SCANNER FEE 0 @ $ = $ - TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENSE = $ 2,041.00 E. ESCALATION A+B Ratio(months) $778,278.85 X 11/18 X 7.0% $ 33,293.04 F. SUBCONSULTANTS 1 Terracon $ 123,706.50 = $ 123,706.50 2 Precision $79,050 = $ 79,050.00 3 Forsgren $420,496 = $ 420,496.10 4 Bionomics $39,459 = $ 39,459.10 5 Badger Daylighting Corp(Utility Potholing) $20,338 = $ 20,337.84 6 1-2-Traffic Counts $1,600 = $ 1,600.00 7 GeoTerra LiDAR $24,875 = $ 24,875.00 8 Gem Locating $2,400 = $ 2,400.00 Subconsultant Sub-Total $ 711,924.54 TOTAL = $1,622,822.28 Page 212 TERRACON GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES Item#9. Linder Rd,Overland Rd to Franklin Rd Meridian,Idaho LABOR HOUR ESTIMATE May 10,2022 Terracon Proposal No.P62215138 SR. GEOTECHN GEOTECH FIELD SR.ADMIN TASK# TASK DESCRIPTION TOTAL GINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER STAFF 4.1 Geotechnical Investigation Administration and Invoicing 18 6 12 Underground Utilities Digline and Permits 24 2 4 18 Soil Borings 121 1 4 12 105 Groundwater Measurements(14 visits) 27 6 21 Infiltration Testing 33 3 30 Laboratory Testing Soil Classification and Lab Assignment) 14 2 10 2 Engineering Analysis(1-84 Overpass,MSE Walls) 44 8 36 Engineering Analysis(Bridge at Ten Mile Creek,Pavements,Drainage) 20 4 16 Draft Geotechnical Engineering Report-ITD Format(1-84 Overpass,MSE Walls) 39 6 24 8 1 Final Geotechnical Engineering Report-ITD Format(1-84 Overpass,MSE Walls) 10 3 6 1 Draft Geotechnical Engineering Report(Bridge at Ten Mile Creek,Pavements,Drainage) 34 6 22 5 1 Final Geotechnical Engineering Report(Bridge at Ten Mile Creek,Pavements,Drainage) 9 2 6 1 Preparation of Geotechnical Special Provisions 10 2 8 Review of Plans and Special Provisions 12 4 8 Meetings 24 24 TOTAL LABOR HOURS 439 67 167 189 16 Page 213 5/10/2022 Item#9. TERRACON GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES Linder Rd,Overland Rd to Franklin Rd Meridian, Idaho COST ESTIMATE A. SUMMARY ESTIMATED LABOR DAY COSTS Labor Hours Hrly Rate Cost 1 Sr. Geotechnical Engineer(R.Olsen) 67 @ $57.69 = $3,865.23 2 Geotechnical Engineer(L. Marsh) 167 @ $42.31 = $7,065.77 3 Field Engineer(M.Amirmojahedi) 189 @ $32.36 = $6,116.04 4 Sr.Admin. Staff(J. Schmalhorst) 16 @ $28.00 = $448.00 SUBTOTAL RAW LABOR COST = $17,495.04 See Attached Labor Hour Estimate B. PAYROLL, FRINGE BENEFIT COSTS&OVERHEAD Total Raw Labor Cost Approved Overhead Rate $17,495.04 X 185.17% _ $32,395.57 C. FIXED FEE Total Raw Labor&Overhead Approved Fixed Fee Rate $49,890.61 X 12.0% _ $5,986.87 D. FCCM Total Raw Labor Cost Approved FCCM Rate $17,495.04 X 0.53% _ $92.72 E. ESCALATION Total Raw Labor&Overhead Esc. Ratio Annual Esc. $55,970.20 X 20% X 4.0% _ $447.76 F. OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSE SUMMARY Estimated Amount Unit Cost Expense ­ 1 Mileagex 624 @ $0.585 = $365.04 2 Printing, Maps, UPS, etc(estimate) 1 @ $100.00 = $100.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENSE = $465.04 G. SUBCONSULTANTS AND TERRACON LABORATORY TESTING Estimated Quantity Unit Cost Expense 1 Drilling Contractor(estimate) XX = $36,598.50 2 Coring Contractor(estimate) xx = $1,350.00 3 Excavation Contractor(estimate) XX = $8,525.00 4 Traffic Control Contractor(estimate) xx = $12,920.00 5 Terracon Laboratory Testing Moisture Content 45 @ $19.00 = $855.00 Atterberg Limits 18 @ $90.00 = $1,620.00 Sieve Analysis, SPT Samples 32 @ $70.00 = $2,240.00 Sieve Analysis, Bulk Samples 3 @ $95.00 = $285.00 pH 4 @ $20.00 = $80.00 Minimum Resistivity 4 @ $70.00 = $280.00 Proctor Tests 3 @ $180.00 = $540.00 R-value Tests 3 @ $510.00 = $1,530.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED SUB/LAB EXPENSE = $66,823.50 xAs per the"FEDERAL PER DIEM RATES FOR IDAHO" See Attached Subconsultant's Summary TOTAL = $123,706.50 Terracon Labor Hour and Cost Estimate_Linder Rd,Overland Rd to Franklin Rd_5-10-22.xls Page 214 5/1 Item#9. HAZ-TECH DRILLING, INC. 1798 E. PLAZA LOOP NAMPA, ID., 83687 PH: (208) 461-7277 OR (800) 359-1502 FAX: (208) 461-5211 PROPOSAL TO: TERRACON DATE 3/7/2022 ATTN: RYAN INVOICE # XX PROJECT: LINDER ROAD EXTENTION FROM FRANKLIN TO OVERLAND MERIDIAN, ID. MOB 1, REVISED TERMS : NET 30 DAYS UNITS UNIT AMOUNT DESCRIPTION EST PRICE EST MOB & DEMOB, PER DAY 2.00 $350.00 $700.00 AUGER DRILLING, PER FOOT 60.00 $25.00 $1,500.00 5' PAVEMENT BORINGS, EACH 6.00 $150.00 $900.00 MOVING /WATER HAUL / STANDBY, PER HOUR 3.00 $200.00 $600.00 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT, PER DAY 2.00 $150.00 $300.00 BENTONITE CHIPS, PER BAG 18.00 $8.00 $144.00 ASPHALT PATCH, PER BAG 6.00 $27.50 $165.00 MOB 1 OFF-SITE CUTTING DISPOSAL 1.00 $200.00 $200.00 TOTAL AMOUNT EST: $4,509.00 TEN MILE CREEK & PAVEMENT BORINGS ****************************************************** 2 AUGER BORINGS TO 30' 6 PAVEMENT BORINGS TO 5' SCOTT CORN Haztech Total Costs Mob 1 = $4,509.00 Mob 2 = $10,180.00 Mob 3 = $16,990.00 Mob 4 = $4,919.50 Total = $36,598.50 Page 215 Item#9. HAZ-TECH DRILLING, INC. 1798 E. PLAZA LOOP NAMPA, ID., 83687 PH: (208) 461-7277 OR (800) 359-1502 FAX: (208) 461-5211 PROPOSAL TO: TERRACON DATE 1/17/2022 ATTN: RYAN INVOICE # XX PROJECT: LINDER ROAD EXTENTION FROM FRANKLIN TO OVERLAND MERIDIAN, ID. MOB 2 TERMS : NET 30 DAYS UNITS UNIT AMOUNT DESCRIPTION EST PRICE EST MOB & DEMOB, PER DAY 3.00 $350.00 $1,050.00 AUGER DRILLING, PER FOOT 260.00 $25.00 $6,500.00 MOVING /WATER HAUL / STANDBY, PER HOUR 5.00 $200.00 $1,000.00 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT, PER DAY 3.00 $150.00 $450.00 BENTONITE CHIPS, PER BAG 60.00 $8.00 $480.00 ASPHALT PATCH, PER BAG 0.00 $27.50 $0.00 PLYWOOD TO PROTECT GRASSY AREAS 1.00 $400.00 $400.00 MOB 2 OFF-SITE CUTTING DISPOSAL 1.00 $300.00 $300.00 TOTAL AMOUNT EST: $10,180.00 RETAINING WALL BORINGS ************************************ 4 AUGER BORINGS TO 40' 2 AUGER BORINGS TO 30' 2 AUGER BORINGS TO 20' SCOTT CORN Haztech Total Costs Mob 1 = $4,509.00 Mob 2 = $10,180.00 Mob 3 = $16,990.00 Mob 4 = $4,919.50 Total = $36,598.50 Page 216 Item#9. HAZ-TECH DRILLING, INC. 1798 E. PLAZA LOOP NAMPA, ID., 83687 PH: (208) 461-7277 OR (800) 359-1502 FAX: (208) 461-5211 PROPOSAL TO: TERRACON DATE 3/7/2022 ATTN: RYAN INVOICE # XX PROJECT: LINDER ROAD EXTENTION FROM FRANKLIN TO OVERLAND MERIDIAN, ID. MOB 3, REVISED TERMS : NET 30 DAYS UNITS UNIT AMOUNT DESCRIPTION EST PRICE EST MOB & DEMOB & DRILLING, PER SHIFT 5.00 $2,800.00 $14,000.00 NIGHT WORK SURCHARGE, PER SHIFT 2.00 $200.00 $400.00 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT, PER DAY 5.00 $150.00 $750.00 BENTONITE CHIPS, PER BAG 30.00 $8.00 $240.00 BENTONITE POWDER, PER BAG 15.00 $15.00 $225.00 BARITE, PER BAG 15.00 $35.00 $525.00 RAPID-SET CONCRETE, PER BAG 9.00 $50.00 $450.00 MOB 3 OFF-SITE CUTTING DISPOSAL 1.00 $400.00 $400.00 ************** TOTAL AMOUNT EST: $16,990.00 OVERPASS BORINGS **************************** 2 AUGER BORINGS TO 100' DAYTIME WITH NO HOUR RESTRICTIONS 1 AUGER BORING TO 100' IN ITD ROW DURING NIGHT TIME HOURS 10PM TO 5AM TERRACON HIRES A-CORE FOR 16" DIAMETER CORES IN ANY CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS SCOTT CORN Haztech Total Costs Mob 1 = $4,509.00 Mob 2 = $10,180.00 Mob 3 = $16,990.00 Mob 4 = $4,919.50 Total = $36,598.50 Page 217 Item#9. HAZ-TECH DRILLING, INC. 1798 E. PLAZA LOOP NAM PA, ID., 83687 PH: (208) 461-7277 OR (800) 359-1502 FAX: (208) 461-5211 PROPOSAL TO: TERRACON DATE 1/17/2022 ATTN: RYAN INVOICE # XX PROJECT: LINDER ROAD EXTENTION FROM FRANKLIN TO OVERLAND MERIDIAN, ID. MOB 4 TERMS : NET 30 DAYS UNITS UNIT AMOUNT DESCRIPTION EST PRICE EST MOB & DEMOB, PER DAY 1.00 $350.00 $350.00 AUGER DRILLING, PER FOOT 52.50 $25.00 $1,312.50 2" PIEZO'S INSTALLED, EACH 3.00 $575.00 $1,725.00 MOVING /WATER HAUL / STANDBY, PER HOUR 1.50 $200.00 $300.00 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT, PER DAY 1.00 $150.00 $150.00 BENTONITE CHIPS, PER BAG 9.00 $8.00 $72.00 SAND, PER BAG 18.00 $20.00 $360.00 FLUSH MOUNT SURFACE COMPLETIONS, EACH 3.00 $150.00 $450.00 MOB 4 OFF-SITE CUTTING DISPOSAL 1.00 $200.00 $200.00 ************** TOTAL AMOUNT EST: $4,919.50 PIEZOMETERS ******************* 3 PIEZO'S TO 17.5' Haztech Total Costs Mob 1 = $4,509.00 Mob 2 = $10,180.00 Mob 3 = $16,990.00 Mob 4 = $4,919.50 Total = $36,598.50 SCOTT CORN Page 218 Item#9. January 13, 2022 Terracon Engineers SYMAN ATTN: Ryan Olsen 11849 West Executive Dr. Suite G Boise, Idaho 83713 Office (208) 387-2938 Fax(208) 323-9592 QUOTATION Syman Project Number: 220061 Estimator: Brad Simpson Estimator Phone: (208)401-5989 Estimator Email: b.simpson@symancompany.com Project Name: Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Test Pits Quote Date: 01/13/2022 Project Location: Ada County, ID ITEM QUANTITY UNITS DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL Backhoe 420 E 30 HR Rubber Tired 4x4 Backhoe $ 125.00 $ 3,750.00 W/Operator ESTIMATED EXCAVATION TOTAL $ 3,750.00 Water Truck 30 HR Water Truck with Driver $ 145.00 $ 4,350.00 ESTIMATED WATER TRUCK TOTAL $ 4,350.00 Mob Fee 1 EA Mob&Demob of equipment $ 425.00 $ 425.00 to Jobsite ESTIMATED MOB TOTAL $ 425.00 $ 8,525.00 *Quantities listed above are estimate only *It is assumed project will take up to four days to complete actual quantities may vary *Tax not included in price *Mob fee applied to water truck and equipment *It is assumed by Syman LLC that Terracon will *It is assumed excavation will occur on first day provide traffic control Labor rate is port to port per man Price good for 65 days from bid date *Charges associated with refilling water truck not included *Syman assumes Terracon will locate all utilities in quote *Water truck will be used to fill infiltration pits It is understood by Syman, LLC that we are to excavate three infiltration test pits on Linder Road between Overland and Franklin in Meridian. Once pit is excavated Syman will provide a water truck and water for Terracon to perform the infiltration test per ACHD methods. It is assumed 9 hours onsite for each test pit for both the backhoe and water truck to complete infiltration tests. Contractor Lic#RCE-22495 SYMAN LLC Cage#4W JN8 Public Works#17170C4 www.symancompany.com Duns#80-7 Page 219 Office(208)287-8421 2101 Delta Dr,Nampa,ID 83687 Fax(208)8 Item#s. r rr^ Quote: 06348 Avg Date: 24 Jan 2022 COSICE7 Expires: 23 Feb 2022 CONCRETE SPECIALISTS L I BOISE A-Core Concrete Specialists of Boise 16531 Business WayBoise ID 83716 Phone# (208) 384-0500 1 Fax# I License# Customer Contact Job Information Quoted By TERRACON INC. RYAN OLSEN 1-84 Jeff Stewart 3006 S. 96TH ST (208)387-2938 1-84&LINDER RD (208)573-6877 Lakewood, ID 98499 ryan.olsen@terracon.coIWIERIDIAN, ID 83642 jeff@a-core.com (253)573-9939 Qty Description Price Adj Total 1 Core Drill Quantity: 1 1,350.00 Each 1,350.00 Diameter: 16" CORE DRILL A 16" HOLES THROUGH 5.5" OF ASPHALT ON TOP OF 11" THICK CONCRETE SLAB. ALL WORK TO BE DONE AT NIGHT (CORE DRILLING AT NIGHT WILL BE AN HOURLY RATE OF $225.00 PER HOUR WITH A 6 HOUR MINIMUM CHARGE) Total 1,350.00 Page 220 Printed: 03/07/2022 02:24:33 PM Page 1 of 2 Item#9. TERRACON GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES Linder Rd,Overland Rd to Franklin Rd Meridian,Idaho Terracon Proposal No. P62215138 Traffic Control ITEM Quantity Unit Price Estimated Cost Traffic Control Flagging(4 flaggers x 9 hours/day x 4 days), per hour 144 $ 45.00 $ 6,480.00 Traffic Control Shoulder Closures, per day 4 $ 500.00 $ 2,000.00 Night Lane Closures on 1-84,per shift 2 $ 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00 Mobilization/Delivery(assumes 4 separate mobilizations),each 4 $ 360.00 $ 1,440.00 TOTALI $ 12,920.00 Based on traffic control unit rates provided by Specialty Construction Supply Page 221 Item#9. TERRACON GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES Linder Rd, Overland Rd to Franklin Rd Meridian, Idaho Terracon Proposal No. P62215138 MILEAGE ESTIMATE ROUNDTRIP TOTAL NO.TRIPS DESTINATION MILEAGE MILEAGE Project: Boring Layout, Utility Clearance, Drilling, 25 Excavation and Infiltration Testing 16 400 14 Project: Groundwater Measurements 16 224 ESTIMATED PROJECT TOTAL MILEAGE 624 Terracon Labor Hour and Cost Estimate—Linder Rd,Overland Rd to Franklin Rd_3-7-22.xlsx\ Page 222 3/ Item#9. MAN-HOUR ESTIMATE LINDER ROAD OVERLAND TO FRANKLIN-TRAFFIC SIGNALS i ACHD PROJECT NO. ACHDACHD GIS NO. May 9,2022 LABOR HOURS TOTAL Principal Eng(PE,PTOE) Project Eng(PE) TASK 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS-PROJECT MANAGEMENT 1.1 Progress Meetings Kick-off Meeting 4 2 2 Progress Meetings(Assume 4) 6 4 2 1.2 Project Administration(18 Month Design) General Project Management 50 40 10 Monthly Invoices 12 12 TASK 1 TOTAL 72 58 14 TASK 4 30%DESIGN 4.6 Concept Intersection and Roadway Design Traffic Signal Initial Layout 24 8 16 4.11 30%Review Meeting Prepare for and Attend Meeting,Summarize Comments and Prepare Responses 4 2 2 TASK 4 TOTAL 28 10 18 TASK 5 75%DESIGN 5.1 Traffic Signal Design Prepare Traffic Design Base Files 50 10 40 Traffic Signal at Linder and Franklin Road(3 sheets) 48 8 40 Traffic Signal at Linder and Overland Road(3 sheets) 48 8 40 PHB Signal at Linder and Tenmile Creek Path(2 sheets) 36 24 12 PHB Signal at Linder and Waltman St(2 sheets) 36 24 12 Quantities 6 2 4 5.10 75%Internal Design Review Submittal Internal Review and prepare Submittals 20 8 12 5.11 75%Review Meeting Prepare for and Attend Meeting,Prepare Signal Meeting Notes, Summarize Comments and Prepare Responses 6 2 4 Plan in Hand Field Review Meeting 2 2 TASK 5 TOTAL 252 88 164 TASK 6 95%DESIGN 6.5 Traffic Signal Design Revise Traffic Design Base Files 28 4 24 Traffic Signal at Linder and Franklin Road(6 sheets) 46 6 40 Traffic Signal at Linder and Overland Road(6 sheets) 46 6 40 PHB Signal at Linder and Tenmile Creek Path(3 sheets) 16 12 4 PHB Signal at Linder and Waltman St(3 sheets) 16 12 4 Quantities 6 2 4 Page 223 Linder Road,Overland to Franklin Ada County Highway District Page Item#9. _ MAN-HOUR ESTIMATE € LINDER ROAD OVERLAND TO FRANKLIN-TRAFFIC SIGNALS .401 ACHD PROJECT NO. ACHACHD GIS NO. If May 9,2022 LABOR HOURS TOTAL Principal Eng(PE,PTOE) Project Eng(PE) kkilh 6.12 Special Provisions Prepare Special Provisions and Use Tax 10 2 8 6.14 95%Internal Design Review Submittal Internal Review and prepare Submittals 18 8 10 6.15 95%Review Meeting Prepare for and Attend Meeting,Prepare Meeting Notes, Summarize Comments and Prepare Responses 4 2 2 TASK 6 TOTAL 190 54 136 TASK 7 99%DESIGN 7.1 Finalize Plans for Right-of-Way Acquisition 40 16 24 TASK 7 TOTAL 40 16 24 ZTASK8 :100%DESIGN-Additional Services TASK 8 TOTAL 0 0 0 TASK 9 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING -Additional Services TASK 9 TOTAL 0 0 0 TOTAL LABOR HOURS 582 226 356 BUDGET HOURLY TOTAL LABOR RATE COST Principal Engineer $145.00 $ 32,770.00 Project Engineer $130.00 $ 46,280.00 TOTAL LABOR $ 79,050.00 TOTAL BUDGET $ 79,050.00 Page 224 Linder Road, Overland to Franklin Ada County Highway District Page Item#s. Road, Overland to Franklin Fo SGREN 0 TOTAL 3 � TASK# TASK DESCRIPTION HOURS ta� d _ a� N fa m . R Q E d N fn W m L J 00 U 1.0 Project Management 278.00 188.00 9.00 1 18.00 18.00 9.00 36.00 0.00 1.1 Progress Meetings&Meridian Task Force Meetings Progress Meetings(includes travel to Meridian) 36.00 36.00 Meridian Task Force Meetings(includes travel) 8.00 8.00 1.2 Project Administration Monthly Invoice/Review Budget 63.00 36.00 27.00 Monthly Progress Report&Schedule Review 18.00 18.00 Internal Coordination Meetings&Misc.Admin. 117.00 54.00 9.00 18.00 18.00 9.00 9.00 Coordination with ITD Bridge 36.00 36.00 2.0 Public Involvement 32.00 16.00 0.00 8.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 2.1 Outreach Kickoff Field Meeting 4.00 4.00 2.2 Virtual Public Meetings Preparation for meeting(Pre-PIM) 10.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 Two Public Information Meetings(Virtual) 18.00 8.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 4.0 30%Design(ITD TS&LIS&L) 513.00 9.00 22.00 126.00 222.00 134.00 0.00 0.00 4.3.1 Praft TS&L Report Options 1 -2 span PS wICIP Deck with MSE Walls 57.00 1.00 2.00 16.00 24.00 14.00 Options 2-2 span PS wICIP Deck; No MSE walls 56.00 2.00 16.00 24.00 14.00 Options 3-2 span PS Deck BT&with MSE Walls 56.00 2.00 16.00 24.00 14.00 Options 4-2 span PS Deck BT; No MSE Walls 56.00 2.00 16.00 24.00 14.00 4.3.2 Final TS&L Report 18.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 6.00 8.00 4.3.3 Draft S&L Plans € #Shts Situation and Layout 1 31.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 8.00 16.00 Sheet Index,Quantities,&Vicinity Map 1 13.00 1.00 2.00 6.00 4.00 Design and General Notes 1 15.00 1.00 2.00 8.00 4.00 MSE Wall Layout 1 54.00 2.00 16.00 16.00 20.00 Pier Plan&Elevation 1 37.00 1.00 8.00 20.00 8.00 Typical Section&Details 1 19.00 1.00 2.00 8.00 8.00 Preliminary Girder Calculation 42.00 2.00 16.00 24.00 4.3.4 Final S&L Plans 35.00 1.00 2.00 8.00 16.00 8.00 4.10 30%Design Submittal 30%Estimate 11.00 1.00 2.00 8.00 Package&Upload files 5.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 4.11 30%Review Meeting 8.00 4.00 4.00 5.0 75%Design 9.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 5.12 75%Review Meeting 9.00 4.00 4.00 1.00 FA will resubmit S&L from 30%for reference by reviewers and attend review meeting. Linder Overpass Manhours 5.9.2022.xlsx Page 1 of 6 Page 225 Item#s. Road, Overland to Franklin Fo SGREN 0 TOTAL 3 � TASK# TASK DESCRIPTION HOURS t a� d _ a� i C C U N r m Cf a7 fa Q a1 d Q_ M C Y N N W m L J ca U 6.0 95%Design(ITD Final Design) 1454.00 29.00 74.00 271.00 568.00 1 512.00 0.00 1 0.00 6.2 95%Design Submittal Bridge Plans(Redlines,CAD,QAQC) € #Shts Situation&Layout 1 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 4.00 Sheet Index,Quantities,&Vicinity Map 1 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 4.00 Design&General Notes 1 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 4.00 Foundation Investigation(by Terracon) 2 9.00 1.00 1 1.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 Footing Layout&Pile Notes 1 47.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 8.00 32.00 Abutment Details 3 83.00 1.00 2.00 8.00 16.00 56.00 MSE Wall Details 2 43.00 1.00 2.00 8.00 16.00 16.00 Pier Details 5 129.00 1.00 8.00 16.00 24.00 80.00 Girder Framing Plan 1 46.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 8.00 32.00 Deck Typical Section&Details 2 38.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 8.00 24.00 Prestressed Girder Sheet 1 43.00 1.00 2.00 8.00 16.00 16.00 Prestressed Girder Details 1 43.00 1.00 2.00 8.00 16.00 16.00 Future Utility Details(power&communication) 1 15.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 8.00 Approach Slab Details 2 34.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 4.00 24.00 42"Single Slope Concrete Parapet 1 23.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 16.00 Concrete Parapet for Combination Railing 2 39.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 32.00 Protective Pedestrian Fence for Comb Rail 2 47.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 40.00 Combination Rail Light Pole Support 1 51.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 16.00 32.00 Bridge Name Signage 1 7.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Date Panel 1 7.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Metal Reinforcement 1 61.00 1.00 4.00 8.00 16.00 32.00 Bridge Design Calculations Light pole support design(on side of Comb.Rail) 49.00 1.00 16.00 32.00 Design of aesthetic metal Ped.Rail on Comb.Rail 17.00 1.00 8.00 8.00 Sizing of exp.Jt.In approach slab 7.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 Utility support design/spacings 7.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 Emp.deck design+Overhang design+Neg.over piers 44.00 4.00 16.00 24.00 Prestressed Girder Design 28.00 4.00 8.00 16.00 Design of SREP bearing pad at pier 21.00 1.00 4.00 16.00 Pier Design(traditional cast-in-place on spread footing) 100.00 4.00 32.00 64.00 Abutment/Pile Design 192.00 8.00 64.00 120.00 Rebar Dev./Laps/Lengths 37.00 1.00 4.00 16.00 16.00 Bridge Quantities 39.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 16.00 16.00 Bridge Cost Estimate 15.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 8.00 Bridge Construction Time Schedule 23.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 16.00 Bridge Special Provisions 35.00 1.00 2.00 8.00 24.00 Perform Load Rating based on design plans 33.00 1.00 4.00 12.00 16.00 6.3 95%Review Meeting 8.00 4.00 4.00 Linder Overpass Manhours 5.9.2022.xlsx Page 2 of 6 Page 226 Item#s. Road, Overland to Franklin Fo SGREN 0 TOTAL 3 � TASK# TASK DESCRIPTION HOURS t a� d _ a� i C C U N fC � m Cf a7 fa Q d a M CY N N W m LJ ca U 7.0 99%Design(ITD PS&E Initial Submittal) 100.00 7.00 1 8.00 17.00 33.00 1 35.00 0.00 1 0.00 7.1 Finalize Plans(update per 95%Review comments) update bridge plans 59.00 1.00 2.00 8.00 16.00 32.00 update bridge quantities 7.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 update bridge cost estimate 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 update construction time schedule 6.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 update bridge special provisions 8.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 Stamp/sign bridge plans 8.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 Stamp/sign final design calculations 7.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 8.0 100%Bid Documents(ITD PS&E Revisions) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Jot in this scope of work Summary of Hours Per Task 1.0 Project Management 278.00 188.00 9.00 18.00 18.00 9.00 36.00 0.00 2.0 Public Involvement 32.00 16.00 0.00 8.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 4.0 30%Design(ITD TS&LIS&L) 513.00 9.00 22.00 126.00 222.00 134.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 75%Design 9.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 6.0 95%Design(ITD Final Design) 1454.00 29.00 74.00 271.00 568.00 512.00 0.00 0.00 7.0 99%Design(ITD PS&E Initial Submittal) 100.00 7.00 8.00 17.00 33.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 8.0 100%Bid Documents(ITD PS&E Revisions) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL LABOR HOURS 2386.00 253.00 113.00 440.00 1 849.00 1 695.00 1 36.00 0.00 Linder Overpass Manhours 5.9.2022.xlsx Page 3 of 6 Page 227 item#s. der Road, Overland to Franklin FORSGPIN A. SUMMARY ESTIMATED MAN-DAY COSTS Raw Labor Man-Hours Hourly Rate Cost 1) Project Manager 253.00 @ $75.75 $19,164.75 2) QA Review(SIR) 113.00 @ $106.73 $12,060.49 3) Sr. Bridge Engineer 440.00 @ $62.89 $27,671.60 4) Bridge Engineer 849.00 @ $48.75 $41,388.75 5) Bridge CADD 695.00 @ $45.00 $31,275.00 6) Clerical 36.00 @ $23.00 $828.00 --- 0.00 @ $0.00 $0.00 --- 0.00 @ $0.00 $0.00 --- 0.00 @ $0.00 $0.00 --- 0.00 @ $0.00 $0.00 --- 0.00 @ $0.00 $0.00 --- 0.00 @ $0.00 $0.00 --- 0.00 @ $0.00 $0.00 --- 0.00 @ $0.00 $0.00 Total Man-Hours = 2386.00 Labor Cost= $132,388.59 B. PAYROLL, FRINGE BENEFIT COSTS & OVERHEAD Total Raw Labor Cost Approved Overhead Rate $132,388.59 X 169.88% _ $224,901.74 C. NET FEE Total Raw Labor& Overhead NET FEES $357,290.33 X 13.5% _ $48,234.19 D. FCCM Total Raw Labor Cost Approved FCCM Rate $132,388.59 X 0.48% $635.47 TOTAL LABOR $406,159.99 (This is not the final total, see next page) Linder Overpass Manhours 5.9.2022.xlsx Page 4 of 6 5/ Page 228 item#s. der Road, Overland to Franklin FORSGPIN E. OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSE SUMMARY Out-of-Pocket Expense Unit Estimated Unit Cost Estimated Expense Description Amount 1) Company Vehicle Mileage Miles 415 @ $ 0.585 = $ 242.78 2) Rental Car Days --- @ $ 120.00 = $ - 3) Fuel for Rental Cara Miles --- @ $ 0.300 = $ - 4) Per Diem2 Days --- @ $ 74.00 = $ - 5) Lodging2 Days --- @ $ 147.00 = $ - 6) Taxes on Lodging4 Days --- @ $ 19.11 = $ - 7) --- --- --- @ $ - _ $ - 8) --- --- --- @ $ - _ $ - 9) --- --- --- @ $ - _ $ - 10) --- --- --- @ $ - _ $ - 11) --- --- --- @ $ - _ $ - 12) --- --- --- @ $ - _ $ - TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENSE = $ 242.78 F. WAGE ESCALATION (See Note 5) A+B+D Ratio (Months) % Raise $357,925.80 X 9/16 X 7.00% = $ 14,093.33 G. SUBCONSULTANTS 1) --- = $ - 2) --- _ $ - 3) --- _ $ - TOTAL = $420,496.10 Footnotes 1) Negotiated % Fee 2) As per the "FY22 FEDERAL PER DIEM RATES FOR IDAHO" 3) Fuel for rental cars assumes $6.00/Gallon at 20 MPG = $0.300/Mile 4) Based on approximate lodging taxes of 13% x Lodging Rate. 5) Forsgren anticipates an annual raise in wages to tentatively go into effective on 1/26/2023. This is ratioed to account for estimated portion of time raises are in effect for this project. Net Fee is excluded from the wage escalation calculation. Linder Overpass Manhours 5.9.2022.xlsx Page 5 of 6 5/ Page 229 0 M N 0 0) d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CM7O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LO 69 eo) 61>eo) 61>eo) 61>eo) 61>eo) � lb�lb�lb�lb�lb�lb�lb�eoll ell O O r l O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O o 0 0 0 < o 0 0 0 0 o M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6F>V�31 U;�V�31 6F->V�31 tF3 6F3 tF3 6F3 tF3 6F3 6�6F3 tF3 6F>613 6F->613 6F;�rbe o co N U o co EO U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p O C C p Q o 0 0 0 0 o D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v � UQUQUV)UQU6U6U6U6UQUQU o o o a e0 m o co E O 0 0 0 0 0 LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c Q o 0 0 M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b leoa o W w a� o a co E m o U N ti (2) o 0 0 m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c � U o o 00 O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q o o N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w uaU=) ��es>���3cty�ses>�c�uaua rres���uac m ca N o co m o c0 E O co O O O O O O O I` O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M 0 0 O O O O O CO 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O ER cf3 e=l er>e=l ci3 e=l O— e=l EA e=l EA Loa cf3 Loa ua ua Ef3 f/- ci3 f/- Cea D C'') O > O of o 0 o co O � o U � o Lo CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD LO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O cu cu Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O c ~ LO E o o � O o cz o m o U rn LO X (V N O W W O O co O O O O ti m H U < F- rnoVVN< Q5 co O In N enc�renc�renc�ren 6r en enc» enc» enc» enc» en6» 6FD 6 . o d � � c � � O c W U) CO cf)N cn Q Q m d LU — M 0 E -0 t- = U) cU Q O W (n a�i (j ca W O c :5 Qit m W Z m cn Y p _j i i i i i i i i2 N J ) _ c e G ) d d3f § \ = a zaz = \ J\ - � A ± ) d _ af7 _ § � » _ \ § { a \ 2 ] } § { \ \ \ 2 ) U � EPEP \ \ � - - ! k § § • k E ) ) 11D BIONOMICS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Linder Road, Overland to Franklin A. SUMMARY ESTIMATED MAN-HOUR COSTS Man-Hours Hrly Rate Labor Cost 1 PRINCIPAL 22 @ $193.00 = $ 4,246.00 2 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM MANAGER 144 @ $135.00 = $ 19,440.00 3 SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST 12 @ $113.00 = $ 1,356.00 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST 0 @ $65.00 = $ - 5 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST 0 @ $105.00 = $ - 6 PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR 82 @ $135.00 = $ 11,070.00 7 SENIOR ARCHAEOLOGIST 20 @ $117.00 = $ 2,340.00 8 CULTURAL RESOURCE SPECIALIST 8 @ $84.00 = $ 672.00 10 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SPECIALIST 0 @ $84.00 = $ - TOTAL LABOR COST = $ 39,124.00 B. ESCALATION Anticipated Start Date: Project duration: 0 months Total Raw Labor&Overhead Esc Ratio Annual Esc Out Year 1 $39,124.00 X 0% X 4.0% _ $0.00 Out Year 2 $39,124.00 X 0% X 8.1% _ $0.00 C. OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSE SUMMARY Estimated Estimated Amount Unit Cost Expense 1 *MILEAGE (Miles) 60 @ $ 0.585 = $ 35.10 30 cultural 30 3 *LODGING (Nights) 0 @ $ 96.00 = $ - 4 *MEALS (Days) 0 @ $ 59.00 = $ - 5 CAR RENTAL (Days) 0 @ $ 100.00 = $ - 6 GAS (Gallons) @ $ 3.50 = $ - 2 AIR TRAVEL(Tickets) 0 @ $ - = $ - 6 AIRPORT PARKING @ $ - = $ - TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENSE = $ 35.10 D. SUBCONSULTANTS/OUTSIDE SERVICES 1 STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REQUEST ** $300.00 = $ 300.00 2 CONSULTANT 1 / IDAHO FISH AND WILDLIFE ** $0.00 = $ - TOTAL = $39,459.10 Pricing Updates: Pricing is updated at least annually,as appropriately determined by Bionomics Environmental, Inc. Services and supplies will be billed at current standard rates,which may be different than the unit prices listed. COVID-19 Update: To the best of our abilities, Bionomics Environmental, Inc.(Bionomics)will try to meet the requirements outlined in the project scope,schedule,and budget as delineated in the contract.As our response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Bionomics is committed to engaging in safety procedures in hopes to protect clients,staff,their families,and the public.Since by definition the COVID-19 impacts are beyond Bionomic's control and are considered a force majeure impact,we cannot be responsible for any delays in delivery or subsequent project delays which could result in related claims,costs,or damages.Should circumstances related to the COVID-19 issue impact our scope,schedule,or budget,we will notify you of the circumstances and mutually agree to an adjustment. * As per the"FEDERAL PER DIEM RATES FOR IDAHO" ** See attached Subconsultant's Summary Page 232 1 41) co § 2 a ) 3 d ] f ) \ = m ) � ) 2 & � » w ) ) ) � A, / ) ) 3 \ \ � > \ \ / \ . 7 2 t E � 2 ) Item#9. GE o' TERRA Date: 1/12/2022 Proposal for Aerial Mapping Services Job# 220019 Submitted to: Barry Whitson Keller Associates Franklin to Overland Corridor: 3153 McNeil Drive Planimetric feature mapping with DTM,contours, Idaho Falls,ID 83401 and new color orthophotography. Corridor will be flown with new aerial photography and lidar to support 1/2'contours. Project Name: Franklin to Overland Corridor Location: Meridian,Idaho Specifications 40-scale,1/2'ctrs JNotes Project Description Corridor Client provided route,1.1 miles Acres 100 Mapping AOI with 50'buffer Map Scale 1"=40' Horizontal Accuracy Standard Contour Interval 1/2' Vertical Accuracy Standard DTM Yes Mass points and Break Lines Vertical Accuracy,photography 0.15' RMSEv Accuracy Calss per ASPRS Map Accuracy Standards(2014) Feature Data Collection Full Full feature layers Image GSD/Photo Scale 4cm Ground Sample Distance(GSD)in cm's Estimated Flight Lines 1 60%forward lap Estimated Aerial Exposures 18 30%side lap Orthophoto Resolution 0.15' 0 to 3 pixel horizontal accuracy Orthophoto Delivery RGB 3-Band,8-bit/band RGB Ground Control Points H-V 8 Targeted or Photo ID-ground control is responsibility of client Ground Control Points V 6 Verical shots throughout corridor Airborne GPS/IMU yes Exposure Location/Orientation Primary Delivery via UPS Ground Delivery Secondary Delivery via FTP/Email Internet Download or Attachment Project Map Yes Attached Project Deliverables: * Features and Contours in AutoCAD format * DTM data in AutoCAD format * Terrain surface in Civil3D AutoCAD format * Lidar data in LAS format classified(ground/non-ground) * Flight Index in AutoCAD format * 3-band imagery to RGB Color Orthophoto Tiles in TIF/TFW Uncompressed Format * 3-band imagery to RGB Color Orthophoto Tiles&Mosaic in 20:1 SID/SDW Compressed Format * Project Metadata(technical details)in standard GeoTerra PDF Format Media Type: Standard Media(CD-ROM,DVD) Schedule: CAD Data will be delivered 5 to 6 weeks from receipt of imagery and ground control coordinates. Orthophoto data will follow within 1 week. * Recommend flying during leaf off conditions early spring 40-scale,1/2'ctrs PROJECT TOTAL Aerial Mapping Services $24,875 Submitted by: Scott Wilson,CP Approved by: GEO TERRA www.GeoTerra.us 208-336-2430 Amount Approved: Date Approved: Page 234 - - t •i -i�., r K� �-- fix. V"� � � � � } � 5�'• �~ �„� � 116 u r f• �1 v, F�7Y f � 1 •xs d'6 ,F maw .tw ti•' 1 � ' 'S. x .+ Item#9. DGEP DAYLIGHTINGTM Badger Hydrovac Service Proposal United States Prepared By: Zachary Funk Email: zfunk@badgerinc.com Date 2022/01/11 www.badaerinc.com Page 1 of Page 236 Item#g. ESTIMATE Badger Daylighting Corp DATE: 2022/01/11 15977 Gunfire Rd Caldwell,ID 83607 Reference#: QT-011122-83790 ID License#RCE-38047 and #020208 "An equal opportunity employer" I PREPARED BY:J Zachary Funk am&MMON Mom Company: KELLER ASSOCIATES INC Contact Name Eric Hulslander Contact Phone# (208)288-1992 E-mail: ehulslander@kellerassociates.com Billing Address: Title: Project Engineer Bill City/State Account#26198 Service Address Scope of Work Quote for Pothole budget planning on Linder overpass project.Numbers subject to change as new information is received. Pothole dimensions are calculated at 12"diameter X 6'deep.Any excessive digging or exploratory trenching outside of pothole dimensions will be billed at hourly rate. Badger Hydrovac With Operator $255.00 HR $0.00 Pothole-in dirt-Depth to 0-6 Ft $450.00 EA $0.00 Pothole-in pavement-Depth to 0-6 Ft $600.00 EA 24 $14,400.00 3rd Party Service(TRAFFIC $2,200.00 DAY 2 $4,400.00 CONTROL) 3rd Party Service(CONTRACTOR) Pavement Panel Replacement, $1,500.00 EA $0.00 if needed Fluctuating Fuel Recovery $1,537.84 Total: $20,337.84 This proposal contains the budgetary estimate to complete the work as described above under the heading"Scope of Work". If any part of the work varies from that described in Scope of Work,or if unexpected digging conditions are encountered(eg rocks, rubble, roots, etc...), then additional charges shall apply. All work will be done on a time and material basis. All work will be done in accordance with the terms and conditions contained in Badger Daylighting Corp.'s standard terms and conditions(USA)attached hereto. Company: PO#: Name (please print): Title: Signature: Date: I am authorized to bind the Company www.badaerinc.com Page 2 of page 237 Item#10. E IDIAN'-'---- JAMu AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Parks and Recreation Department: Agreement with Killer Whales Swim Team for Use of Meridian Community Swimming Pool Between the City of Meridian and the Meridian Killer Whales Swim Team, Inc. Page 238 AGREEMENT WITH KILLER WHALES SWIM TEAM FOR USE OF MERIDIAN COMMUNITY SWIMMING POOL This AGREEMENT WITH KILLER WHALES SWIM TEAM FOR USE OF MERIDIAN COMMUNITY SWIMMING POOL("Agreement") is made this I tj day of MA,A--, 2022 ("Effective Date"), by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("City") and the Meridian Killer Whales Swim Team, Inc., a non-profit corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("Team") (collectively, "Parties"). WHEREAS, City operates the Meridian Community Swimming Pool and related facilities, located at 213 E. Franklin Road ,in Meridian, Idaho (the"Pool"), for the benefit of its patrons and for the purpose of encouraging its patrons to learn to swim both recreationally and competitively; WHEREAS,Team offers and operates a swim team; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into an agreement whereby Team can use the Pool for its swim team's practice and to host swim meets; NOW,THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and agreements herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, including the above recitals, it is hereby agreed by and between the Parties as follows: I. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall be June 6, 2022 through July 16, 2022. II. RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITY.During the term of this Agreement, City shall have the following responsibilities and obligations. A. Use of Pool. City shall provide Team use of the Pool from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday through Friday, subject to City's right to staff the Pool office and conduct business, including business with the public other than use of the swimming pool (e.g., swimming lesson registrations). B. Lifeguards. City shall provide two (2) certified lifeguards for all Team swim practices and swim meets, at Team's sole expense, as set forth below. C. Operation of Pool. City shall be responsible for operation and maintenance of the Pool and its related systems. Team acknowledges that City's obligation to maintain the Pool may result in periods where Team's use of the Pool may be prohibited or restricted. D. Equipment storage. City shall provide an area for storage of Team's equipment. III.RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF TEAM. During the term of this Agreement, Team shall have the following responsibilities and obligations. A. Safety and regulations. All use of the Pool by Team shall comply in all respects with this Agreement, with City's rules and regulations for use of Pool, and with City's safety and operating procedures at the Pool. At all times,Team shall follow all directions of the AGREEMENT WITH KILLER WHALES FOR USE OF SWIMMING POOL PAGE 1 Pool Manager, pursuant to guidelines established by City. This provision shall apply to Team and each and all of Team's employees, volunteers, guests, invitees, and agents at all Team practices, meets, meetings, and social gatherings occurring at Pool. B. Swim practices. Team shall be entitled to the use of the Pool only for scheduled swim practices and swim meets, as scheduled with the Pool Manager, during the term of and subject to the provisions of this Agreement. Any other use of the Pool by Team shall require payment of City's standard rental fee for the use of the Pool. C. Documentation. Prior to allowing any swimmer to enter the water at the Pool, Team shall provide the following documents to City: 1. One liability release form, attached hereto as Exhibit A, signed by each prospective swimmer, including their parent or legal guardian if the swimmer is under the age of eighteen (18), and a liability release form for any Team member, coach, or other person who may or does enter the water during any Team swim practice session. 2. Proof of membership and certification of all of Team's coaches who are USA Swimming members, and have successfully completed the current year's Safety Training for Swim Coaches' training program, including Head-first Entries and Racing Start Safety. 3. A list of all swimmers who are certified to perform a shallow racing start in four feet "! (4') of water, pursuant to USA Swimming rules. If this list changes during the term of this Agreement, Team shall promptly provide City with an updated list. Team shall prohibit any swimmer from diving or making any racing start, whether from blocks or from the side of the pool, whether at practice or at a swim meet, in any area where the depth of the pool is four foot(4') less, unless such swimmer has current racing start certification under USA Swimming rules. Team shall ensure that all swimmers understand that starting or diving in the four-foot(4') section is only allowed at Pool at Team practice or swim meets. 4. Proof of insurance demonstrating coverage pursuant to the following provisions: a. Team shall purchase and maintain in force throughout the term of this Agreement a policy of general liability insurance covering the activities of Team pursuant or in the course of activities related to this Agreement, having a combined single limit of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per person and per occurrence and property damage liability insurance with a limit of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000)per accident or occurrence. b. Team shall purchase and maintain in force throughout the term of this Agreement workers' compensation insurance on any and all persons in Team's employ, in the minimum amount(s) as required by Idaho law. c. All policies of insurance provided for herein shall be issued by insurance companies rated A, Class VI, or better in Best's Key Rating Guide and qualified to do business in the State of Idaho. All insurance required to be furnished by Team name City as an additional insured. Team shall deliver proof of such AGREEMENT WITH KILLER WHALES FOR USE OF SWIMMING POOL PAGE 2 insurance within fourteen (14) days of execution of this Agreement. Failure of Team to renew or replace such insurance at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of any policy required by this Agreement shall constitute a material default under the terms of this Agreement. D. Compliance with policy terms. Team shall not do or permit to be done any act or thing at the Pool which would (a)jeopardize or be in conflict with insurance policies required by this Agreement; (b) increase the rate of any insurance applicable to the Pool to an amount higher than it otherwise would be for the typical use of the Pool; or (c) subject City to any liability or responsibility for injury to any person or persons or to property by reason of any activity undertaken during Team's use of the Pool. E. Coaches CPR-certified. All of Team's coaches shall be certified in cardiopulmonary resuscitation ("CPR"). Team shall allow absolutely no swimming in the Pool unless a CPR-certified swim coach, provided by Team, is present at all times. F. Payment for lifeguards. Within thirty(30) days of City's invoice, Team shall pay City for lifeguards in the amount of each lifeguard's fully loaded hourly rate, to include each lifeguard's hourly gross wages plus the cost of City payroll benefits and taxes. City shall provide Team with a list of the lifeguards' fully loaded hourly rates. G. Equipment storage. Team shall be responsible for providing, storing, securing, maintaining, and repairing Team's equipment. Team shall store equipment at the Pool only in the area designated for same by City, and only during the term of this Agreement, with the exception of the Team's lane line reel, which may be stored at Pool year-round, at the direction and election of City's Pool Manager. Team acknowledges that storing equipment at Pool carries risks, some of which may be unknown, and agrees to assume all known and unknown risks of such activity. H. No office use. Team shall ensure that no one, other than authorized employees of City, enters the Pool office unless expressly permitted by City's Pool Manager. I. Swim meets. Team may host up to three(3) swim meets at the Pool, on dates and at times as previously approved by City's pool manager. All swim meets shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. Team shall pay City a set fee of one thousand two hundred dollars ($1,200.00)per swim meet. Payments to City for Pool rental shall be made by Team within seven (7) days of scheduling the swim meet. 2. Team shall collect from all swim teams participating in any swim meet at the Pool proof of insurance in the amount set forth in section III.C.4, above, and shall provide such proof to the Pool Manager prior to the meet. Further, Team shall communicate to all teams participating in any swim meet at the Pool that any no swimmer may dive or making any racing start, whether from the starting blocks or from the side of the pool, in any area where the depth of the pool is four foot(4') or less, unless such swimmer has current racing start certification under USA Swimming rules. Team shall ensure that any individuals at swim meets, including, but not limited to, swim meet participants, spectators,judges, and coaches follow all safety and operating procedures at the Pool. AGREEMENT WITH KILLER WHALES FOR USE OF SWIMMING POOL PAGE 3 3. Only Pool staff, coaches, swimmers who are participating in the meet,judges, and timers shall be allowed on deck and/or in the locker rooms, from the beginning of the meet to the end of the meet. All spectators, including non-competing Team members, shall remain on the exterior of the fence throughout the meet. J. Indemnification. Team specifically indemnifies City and holds City harmless from any loss, liability, claim,judgment, or action for damages or injury to Team, to Team's personal property or equipment, and to Team's employees, volunteers, agents, guests, invitees, or members arising out of or resulting from the condition of the Pool or any lack of maintenance or repair thereon and not caused by or arising out of the tortious conduct of City or its employees. Team further agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any loss, liability, claim or action from damages or injuries to persons or property in any way arising out of or resulting from the use and occupancy of the Pool by Team or by Team's employees, volunteers, agents, guests, invitees, or members and not caused by or arising out of the tortious conduct of City or its employees. Team's indemnification of City as set forth in this provision shall specifically include all claims, actions,judgments for damages, injury to persons and/or property, damages, losses and expenses, including City's reasonable attorney fees arising out of, or as a result of, any swimmer's dive or racing start, regardless of the actions of City. If any claim, suit or action is filed against City for any loss or claim described in this paragraph, Team, at City's option, shall defend City and assume all costs, including attorney's fees, associated with the defense or resolution thereof, or indemnify City for all such costs and fees incurred by City in the defense or resolution thereof. K. Exterior displays. Team shall not install, display, or use permanent or temporary exterior lighting, amplifiers, speakers, signs, flags, or other devices or medium which may be heard or seen outside the Pool, unless first specifically approved, in writing, by the Pool Manager. Such approval shall include a time limit, and may be revoked at any time, at Pool Manager's sole election. IV.GENERAL TERMS. A. Default or breach; cure; termination. If Team is in breach or default of any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement and Team fails or refuses to cure such breach or default within ten (10) days of City's written notice thereof, this Agreement, and all rights of Team in and to Pool, at City's option, may be deemed terminated and forfeited without further notice or demand. In the event of any default or breach of this Agreement and Team's failure or refusal to cure, City may bar Team's access to the Pool, without prejudice to any and all other rights and remedies City may have. In the event of a termination by City, with or without cause, any fees due to City by Team under the terms of this Agreement through the time of termination shall remain payable by Team to City. The rights, privileges, elections and remedies of City set forth in this Agreement or Y g P g Y g allowed by law or equity are cumulative, and the enforcement by City of a specific remedy shall not constitute an election of remedies and/or a waiver of other available remedies. B. Force Majeure. In the event of damage to the Pool or unsafe conditions due to a Force Majeure, this Agreement shall be terminated upon mailing of notice by City. "Force Majeure" shall mean a cause or event that is not reasonably foreseeable or otherwise AGREEMENT WITH KILLER WHALES FOR USE OF SWIMMING POOL PAGE 4 I caused by or under the control of either Party, including acts of God, pandemic, fire, flood, vandalism, accident, governmental act, threat to human health or safety, or other like events that are beyond the reasonable anticipation or control of the Parties. C. Notices. Day-to-day, informal communication with the Pool Manager shall occur by email or phone. All other notices to be provided under this Agreement shall be in writing and addressed as follows: If to Team: If to City: Meridian Killer Whales Swim Team, Inc. City Clerk, City of Meridian Attn: Lynlee S. Richards 33 East Broadway Avenue 4025 N. Cecina Place Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian ID 83646 Notices shall be either personally delivered or sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid. Notice shall be deemed to have been given upon deposit in the U.S. mail, or upon personal delivery to the party above specified. D. No assignment. Team shall not, without first obtaining City's consent; (a) subcontract, sell, sublet, assign, mortgage, or transfer this Agreement or any interest herein; (b) allow the use or occupancy of the Pool by anyone other than Team. No assignment shall relieve Team of any liability under this Agreement, unless City consents in writing to accept such assignment as a whole or partial novation. E. Public venue. Team acknowledges that the Pool is a public place. To this end, all Team activities at Pool shall be appropriate for all ages, values, and sensibilities. Hosted activities, staff attire, decorations, signage, and entertainment shall not include language and/or behavior that is profane, obscene, violent, or discriminatory; shall not promote, foster, or perpetuate discrimination on the basis of race, creed, color, age, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or national origin; shall not include defamatory or personal attacks, threats to any person or organization, or content that promotes, fosters, perpetuates, or incites conduct in violation of any federal, state or local law; content that violates a known legal ownership interest, such as a copyright, of any party; or any content that contains or perpetuates a message that Landlord deems to be inappropriate or not in the best interest of the City of Meridian. F. Nondiscrimination. Both Parties warrant and agree that there shall be no discrimination against any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry, in the course of Team's use, occupancy, or enjoyment of the Pool G. Attorney fees. In the event of any litigation between the Parties concerning this Agreement, the unsuccessful party in such litigation shall fully reimburse the prevailing party for all reasonable costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred in such litigation. H. Applicable law; nonappropriation. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the statutes and constitution of the State of Idaho, including, without limitation, Article VIII, Section 3, of the Idaho Constitution.Team acknowledges that City is a governmental entity, and the validity of this agreement is based upon the availability of public funding under the authority of its statutory mandate. AGREEMENT WITH KILLER WHALES FOR USE OF SWIMMING POOL PAGE 5 Notwithstanding anything in this agreement to the contrary, City's obligations under this Agreement are subject to and dependent upon appropriations being made by Meridian City Council for such purpose. I. Compliance with laws. Throughout the course of this Agreement, Team and each and all of Team's employees, volunteers, guests, invitees, and agents shall comply with any and all applicable federal, state, and local laws. J. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected. K. Exhibits. All exhibits to this Agreement are incorporated by reference and made a part of hereof as if the exhibits were set forth in their entirety herein. L. Entire agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. No verbal or written inducements to execute this Agreement have been made to Team. In entering into this Agreement, Team relies upon no statement, fact, promise or representation, whether express or implied, written or oral, not specifically set forth herein in writing. This Agreement may not be amended, modified, altered, or changed in any respect whatsoever, except by further agreement in writing duly executed by the Parties. M. Warranty of authority. Each party to this Agreement represents and warrants that the execution, delivery, and performance of this Agreement has been duly authorized by all necessary action of such party and upon execution shall be a valid and binding obligation upon the Parties. N. City Council approval required. The validity of this Lease shall be expressly conditioned upon City Council action approving same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the Effective Date first above written. TEAM: Meridian Killer Whales Swim Team, Inc. A(Ain B Its CITY OF MERIDIAN: BY: Attest: Robert E. Simison, Mayor 5-24-2022 Chris Johnson, City Clerk 5-24-2022 I AGREEMENT WITH KILLER WHALES FOR USE OF SWIMMING POOL PAGE 6 i I i Item#10. EXHIBIT A LIABILITY RELEASE FORM AGREEMENT WITH KILLER WHALES FOR USE OF SWIMMING POOL PAGE Page 245 i i Item#10. E IDIAN: Meridian Parks and Recreation Department LIABILITY RELEASE FORM In consideration of my/my child's use of the Meridian Community Swimming Pool and related facilities,located at 213 E.Franklin Road, in Meridian,Idaho(the"Pool"),I acknowledge and understand that each and all of the following terms and conditions will apply to such use: My/my child's use of and participation in activities conducted at the Pool is conditioned at all times INITIAL upon my/my child following all applicable rules,regulations,laws,and City of Meridian policies. I acknowledge that my/my child's use of the Pool carries risks, some of which are unknown, and INITIAL with that knowledge do assume all known and unknown risks and hazards of such use. I acknowledge that the Pool is provided for this use on an as-is basis. Prior to participating in or INITIAL allowing my child to participate in any class,practice session, clinic, meet,competition, or any other activity at the Pool,I will inspect the Pool facilities and equipment, and if anything is deemed unsafe or beyond my/my child's capability,I/my child will not participate in such activities or otherwise use the Pool. I assume sole responsibility for any and all injuries or damage caused by, incurred by, or related to INITIAL my/my child's use of the Pool that is not attributable to the tortious conduct of the City of Meridian or its employees. I release from liability, and indemnify and hold harmless the City of Meridian and its employees, INITIAL agents, and officers,for any injury,death,property loss,theft, or property damage in connection with, at, or in any way arising out of,my/my child's use of the Pool that is not attributable to the tortious conduct of the City of Meridian or its employees. I acknowledge that activities undertaken at the Pool will include physical activity,contact with INITIAL others, slippery surfaces,diving in shallow water,noise,and other hazards, some of which are unknown, and that I bear sole responsibility for verifying that such activities are appropriate for my/my child's physical and mental condition. I understand that the City of Meridian provides and will provide no insurance or benefit coverage of INITIAL any kind for injury, death,property loss,theft,or property damage resulting from or related to my/my child's use of the Pool. I have had time to read and understand all of the above conditions and terms. My signature below INITIAL signifies that I consent to these terms on behalf of myself/my child and wish to use the Pool pursuant to these terms and conditions. I understand that by signing this agreement,I cannot later bring a claim against the City of Meridian or its employees. Signature: Print name: Date: Phone: E-mail: Check one: ❑Pool user is 18 or older ❑Pool user is under 18;parent/guardian is signing. Pool user name: Page 246 Item#11. E IDIAN,_1_-_1, JAMu AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Fiscal Year 2022 Net-Zero Budget Amendment in the Amount of$3000.00 to Accept Donated Revenue to offset Mayor's Walking Club Related Expenses Page 247 X N X N N O N N N n N NI ti `o N r C ,\ Q 0- 0 O O U z z N N N N ' m F7 A N \ N 1 M N N 4 00 N NI N 00 LL u ^ ^ oLOate+ g LO V c 0 aj a u 0 0 m Ln E (u O V i 1 C fo N 3 o a) a H E ^ ^ O °• m Q " a c w o Y Q 41. Q > v w f0 3 J O J ui ui LL `o C E E a o o 4J m L N° N z Z E z °4�5 lb LU m a O `o (U Q) LL o I Of LL _ _ E E 0O 41 4C w � a In n O O o = w o O _ 0 0 0 o u ° Eco r.i rri y W w � ° c o v v O C � OI S5 c C ° a v v v a Q U a s : a nn 3 E LL > Q a ~ o c a v QL 0° m Y - u U N C Q U U ~ N � O � 3 =3 O m v 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 6 N "' la N "' N ° v ° ° O ~ ~ ~ ° N O o LL a V ++ 7 6 _� G1 O O m N C y r o O cl l °; °; X a O g •� 7 U v v W = C w °" °" a m v G v v u o w w o 0 0 0 — `= a�i CL 0 O E m ` o c c a`r .� H Q) Q) H n m a n v v CL n n 'm c� w w O `u c> j a) - d Ll a) N O U a) T T UJ v a) a) H M U O v a v c c O O c�6 7 7 r YL Xt v v l7 cM > E U ° °- l7 E E C7 l7 c c d O O LL a w U U 2k 2k �k 2k O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 'p O O O O O O 0 O O L OL C O lD O C �--� N M m O O O O E O O ci O N N N N c-I c-I O O -O N N N M O O O O I� n CO 00 C C C C C V V V V (A Ln L!1 M M E (U � y m 3 4� W M M M M M M M M a) m m m m m m m m m m m m m I m m m m m m w m m m N U .m-i .m-i .m-i .m-i ti ti ti ti W N --� N N N N N N N --� N N --� �� ti ti ti ti ti ti 0 � - - - CA �+ L M bA co N 4''cq yX N N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 X N X N N O N N_ N NI `o N c O Q 4 7 U 3 V) C ti c ' G a7 1 oOn Y w u -c _ `ti NI Q a) } 7 4 N y O LL T C a t O ca " °' N a ai v a E m o a v ° u E OL oa G c 3 g L I ILO � m a E _ a c v Q O O C pp Y J iA •{��' 1 CLO ai E Q. m i. a o = j Q O aJ c 0 m R rr Z Lvl q o `t m �. j -O a) C T C w a) L u a' H c a ai .° E 0 w a LL Ea) cp¢a7 E oEE oN c 'v +-' �o WO 04— C ° v� u E Q H16 O E w -o v a) v v c E ` O o he °1 o .o O E a 4 3 Ta v =0 '06 'E O N i 0 c G w T 6 C ai _7 a N O G y) y � _ - Qj a` w U O a.c 7 o 06 -Cc Q15 t - -E •33 E ai a N N f6 Z N 3 G7 V/ o LL LL o .� u C co vNi u Cl Z Y 3 0 O G w ° A A A A A A f 6 E C7 y N a) N O .oG 3 rv. v c T �_ v o �n/� a aL..' Y O N i N M n a, o N a� N m o > bi v• (v E 3 > +° a °N Q vui N O u W Qu C N W y O N i Q N 30 U w Qj L) v v v of 0 a - N e O rv• �a a) L N Y L o LL v v a) > c E m u c 3 a Coi 0 > ar .� 2 v N H 'O o � a u v (D N o o_ N e o V cc O O aJ y w N 7 bloa) a) N E 1 O N N .O y -O C X it fN6 w — O O II O. •L W 4/} 4/} 4/} d O a 7 a) a a ry a) � g "C S fa L 7 yL, aN-' � O a) G a) fU W 3 a+ N a3 27 U T i c O O a) z C G 7 fa , c t U E G LO a) W a) O w y -O 3 O ry c0 L O G L ` /1 r N aJ -0 a ' +° E v c v ° a 0 3 N E i U O 0 — w rv• L ° 8 w a a) � > o B I - L ~ o a° c a ^ ° o m w o in in in a) L -O a) oa >' - c 00 > a E 5 V 'A c , O v F v on m -0 -0 E o a) w O rn `o } N aJ c L w 3 y Ol O 7 O N D T C OD Y aJ N a) _0 G E 6) " in v) v) oc° ncaE .+ c v c f0 a) U N 'G aE) o 3 LL C- -0 E 7 on `o c ° aa)) Y N w `o O O N u v7i L w C c O_ a) N c G ' p'ti t y v o o c �! fl > o o E u y, NLL i s 0 0 c c N a a > N `^ m c a - w a) o°1n o m N O � c c a) v a N c aO u v N' > a o Y L 7 a -Ea v s o > s c v 7 o ry 0 O- a e E fn s -o '� O 0) v u �n — N i W i/f t/f V? VT y Uc N 7 N N CI u aT+ _ C LO a.. N Uo on E v o -0 _°o o c 'E 7 cr v N o 41!" tip a+ c a) v o°1n v E c o ° v E v o°n E j L E E m7 a) 'O d > s _0 7 f6 0_ „ o E N -o c o N •p N c ^� W a+ 4 L Y p 4 Q a) O 7 G U U a) � G N 7 = fa N f6 aa)) fl- 7 U a) E c6 a) = a) Q W a L o E o- a) a) •Y c v v E c c L (U6 O E LL aL-+ a) aL•' c > !6 Q a) .� N O C �1 3 v 3 o LL o v �+ YL6f c a, a N �y Ol C N U vCmi T N (6 U to ut O V' a) m N._ W N NO 1; C — a) L L N N V ++ a1 T L-+ f .� m � !� , a1°-' — U a) ns O C N ++ o Q •Q o v 6 v o a A v vQ Q a O u H W a i rvi r v° v N 0 vi > oo Oi z J '� U Item#12. E IDIAN'-'---- JAMu AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution No. 22-2328: A Resolution of the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Meridian, Reappointing Tom LeClaire to Seat 8 and Ryan Lancaster to Seat 9 of the Meridian Transportation Commission; and Providing an Effective Date Page 250 CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 22-2328 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, HOAGLUN, PERREAULT, STRADER A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, REAPPOINTING TOM LECLAIRE TO SEAT 8 AND RYAN LANCASTER TO SEAT 9 OF THE MERIDIAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Meridian City Code 2-1-1 establishes the Meridian Transportation Commission, its members and terms of their appointments; WHEREAS, Tom LeClaire was appointed to Seat 8 on the Meridian Transportation Commission by Resolution No. 19-2155 on July 9, 2019; WHEREAS, Ryan Lancaster was appointed to Seat 9 of the Meridian Transportation Commission on June 28, 2016 by Resolution No. 16-1148 and reappointed by Resolution No. 19-2155 on July 9, 2019; and WHEREAS,the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian deems the reappointment of Tom LeClaire to Seat 8 and Ryan Lancaster to Seat 9 of the Meridian Transportation Commission to be in the best interest of the Meridian Transportation Commission and of the City of Meridian. NOW THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY,IDAHO: Section 1. That pursuant to Meridian City Code § 2-1-1, Tom LeClaire is hereby reappointed to Seat 8 and Ryan Lancaster is hereby reappointed to Seat 9 of the Meridian Transportation Commission, for terms to expire May 31, 2025. Section 2. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 24th day of May, 2022. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 24th day of May, 2022. APPROVED: ATTEST: By: Mayor Robert E. Simison Chris Johnson, City Clerk RESOLUTION FOR REAPPOINTMENT OF LECLAIR AND LANCASTER-MERIDIAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Item#13. E IDIAN'-'---- JAMu AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: City of Meridian Financial Report - April 2022 Page 252 Item#13. City of Meridian Monthly Financial Report FY2022 April 2022 Table of Contents Report Name Page Number Investment Graphs 2 Fund Balance 3 - c � — - :: :■ ion l■■ A 5 - irr ri j C>WEE D F:\Reporting\Monthly Reports\FY2022\FY22 -7 Apr Council Report Page 253 Item#13. Monthly Financial Report (L%WE IDIAN - FY2022 April 2022 I D A H O City of Meridian Investment Portfolio Yield by Investment Type IDAHO STATE POOL 00 0.23% IDAHO BOND 1.32% FUND CASH 0.00% FIB M 0,25% •FIB MoneyMarket$1,649,395 -Cash$11,992,755 MONEY MARKET •Idaho Bond Fund$71,931,057 •Idaho State Pool$138,927,365 City of Meridian Interest/Investment Income City of Meridian Cash/Investments Balance by Major Fund by Major Fund $900,000 — $800,000 $140,000,000 $700,000 — $120,000,000 $600,000 $100,000,000 $500,000 $400,000 $80,000,000 $300,000 $60,000,000 $200,000 $40,000,000 $100,000 $20,000,000 $0 General Enterprise $_ General Fund Enterprise Fund ■Total Budget ■Actual YTD ■FY22 ■FY21 Page 254 F:\Reporting\Monthly Reports\FY2022\FY22-7 Apr Council Report Item#13. Monthly Financial Report FY2022 CqJ1ERIDIAN*,--- April 2022 IDAHO GENERAL FUND BALANCE ALLOCATIONS $120,000,000 $100,000,000 $80,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 -Mrs $20,000,000 ........ 9/30/2015 9/30/2016 9/30/2017 9/30/2018 9/30/2019 9/30/2020 9/30/2021 ■Nonspendable ■Restricted ■Committed ■Assigned ■Assigned Reserves ■unassigned ENTERPRISE FUND BALANCE ALLOCATIONS $90,000,000 $80,000,000 $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 .. ..... _. $10,000,000 it JI-1 ._..... $ 9/30/2015 9/30/2016 9/30/2017 9/30/2018 9/30/2019 9/30/2020 9/30/2021 ■Assigned ■Unassigned ■Assinged Reserves Page 255 F:\Reporting\Monthly Reports\FY2022\FY22-7 Apr Council Report 14 C i E IDIAN;--- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ada County Assessor Annual Report YnP ` 4 i Ik " 1 _ 1� A c - d t r 11�1111I11ARMAAti, y 5 9 `f I � I `F' i • � r r, P -r- � :A �f q Tii FCAVENER i A� t3 a _ s k RR11 ,yy "a - �--•� \ \mot \.t , • III i /i .yl/<>iF"t•r�LS�T..r�K L-• s: _. ......_ / ii i.-. _ .` a'_ _ l c- lk r ' 10j�/� mim-I '-�IA�,..r^:�:.r'.�zrG�w��•!'� 1�>>`/ �?.i7 J / � .. � r its � y._ � \ -" -,S_-� �� / 06-404W-71,58;t, ff33 �•� �K s r.� a� y� 1 Wu AM t tp i y " I ROSERT S�tMISON 4 I�� 4W IA 1 _ i M I ..r F � ' FN F � 4 f l yy n {IcRiuwt �. E v �Pc __ >:� _ .. ,� , � i g` �. �� i J rr�..: I ���' i --, - � =—� —,�' .. � 1 � r_ l� �� � � �--� - ���� . ,�� .�� '� ,� _ �� � �� r - � t ra► �,. _ _ _ ,.� _ x..fNrt�[N�Qua.G D.ry � �-- - .. :. .� y � i� _ _ i�. .,j. r �'\�,�I r: 1` to�'���i s l ��+�✓ , i - r�oct 1'zTT ov t e Item#15. E IDIAN'-'---- JAMu AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Valley Regional Transit: 30 Pine Route and Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Request Page 256 Item#15. val leyreg i o n a ltransit Valley Regional Transit VRT Update and FY2023 Budget Request Background Since 2005 Meridian has supported intercounty services connecting Meridian to Nampa and Boise. These services are funded by Ada County, Caldwell, Canyon County, Nampa, Meridian and Boise. Also, because they operate out of the small urban area of Nampa and Caldwell their operations are also supported by federal funds. In 2017 VRT began partnering with Harvest Transit to provide specialized service within Meridian to seniors and persons with disability. Since then VRT and the City of Meridian have worked on expanding the specialized services to include service to veterans and transportation to medical appointments. In 2018 VRT began planning with the City of Meridian to bring public transportation to downtown Meridian and connect the employment centers at Ten Mile and the Village. This service will be more than a 150% increase in the amount of fixed route public transportation service provided in Meridian. In 2020 Meridian supported the necessary capital expansion to start this new service. COVID-19 has delayed its implementation until its planned start in FY2023. Fixed Route Services Figure 1 below shows the proposed routes and stops in Meridian for FY2023. Figure 1:Map of Proposed FY2023 Fixed Route Services in Meridian — 30-Pine — 40-Nampa/Meridian Express — 42-Happy Day to Towne Square Mall Cherry Z Meridian VJ F�anF1 A E'�zi�El�i.Rd SMi ti - Medical C-na JV"" nrn Vrrerrs Mmm�i-al liwv 5N'Ov,'n"d Rai c A2060ft Mupb,.r o­,s—,h-i— 1 Page 257 Item#15. val leyreg i o n a ltransit Currently, Meridian is served by two intercounty routes; • 40 Nampa/Meridian Express which runs Monday through Friday during the rush hour with stops in Meridian along Overland Road • 42 Happy Day to Towne Square Mall which makes eight trips throughout the day every Monday through Friday, connecting Caldwell, Nampa, Meridian and Boise. VRT recommends starting the 30 Pine service on October 3, 2022. The route launch was postponed in October 2022 due to effects of the pandemic. We believe the metrics in ridership, employees returning to offices, multifamily housing units and other development factors, and gas prices all lead to the recommendation to launch the service in the fall. This service will connect Ten Mile Crossing, Downtown Meridian, the Scentsy and Blue Cross of Idaho campuses and Kleiner Park. VRT is currently planning the roll-out and marketing of this new service and will coordinate with City of Meridian on opportunities to increase public awareness of this new service. These outreach efforts can include getting a bus in the Meridian Dairy Days parade, reaching out to residential and commercial developers at Ten Mile Crossing, Downtown Meridian, and Kleiner Park, Scentsy and Blue Cross of Idaho to promote the services and market it to their residents and employees. Specialized Services In addition to the fixed route services in Meridian, VRT provides support to three other specialized transportation options. Those services include: • Harvest Transit which provides free transportation for seniors, persons with disabilities and veterans from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. Monday through Saturday within a designated service area in Meridian. • Rides2Wellness which provides shared-ride transportation to participating medical appointments. Rides must be scheduled 2 days in advance. • Meridian Veterans Shuttle which provides transportation to Veterans in Meridian to the Veterans Hospital in downtown Boise. FY23 Preliminary Budget Summary Local contributions are pooled together with other local and federal funds to deliver all the services of Valley Regional Transit. The degree to which local contributions are leveraged depends on the type of expense (capital vs operating, specialized vs fixed route), and the availability of federal funds. For example, federal funds typically require at least 20% local match for capital expenses, while fixed route operations can be matched at 50%. 2 Page 258 Item#15. val leyreg i o n a ltransit Table 1 below illustrates how Meridian's contribution is one part of a proposed preliminary $33.7M budget for FY2023 and supported contributions from other jurisdictions, federal funds and directly generated and auxiliary funds. Table 1: FY2023 Proposed Budget Revenues and Expenses FY23 Proposed Budget Summary Expenses $ 33,747,053 Revenues Fares/Passes $ 815,340 Federal Relief $ 0 Federal Formula $ 14,997,120 Auxiliary Local $ 640,000 Sub Total Federal and Directly Generated Revenues $ 16,452,460 Local Contributions $ 17,294,592 Meridian Share (included in total local revenues) $ 884,918 Grand Total Revenues $ 33,747,053 City of Meridian Funding Requests Fiscal year 2021 and 2022 funding requests represent budgets and service levels built to maintain service levels and keep local funding requests stable through the pandemic. This was made possible by funding provided through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief & Economic Security Act (CARES), and American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). Table 2 reflects results of the cost allocation model without these additional funds applied. Table 3 provides historical contributions per signed cooperative agreements with the additional funds applied. Table 2: Baseline Requests for Comparison Cost Allocation Outputs FY22 Baseline Request FY23 Baseline Request General Assessment $ 67,526 $ 70,588 Service Assessment $ 507,040 $ 609,623 Capital Assessment $ 12,869 $ 25,804 Special Assessment $170,000 $ 170,000 Reserve Assessment $ 0 $ 8,903 Total Request $ 757,436 $ 884,917 3 Page 259 Item#15. val leyreg i o n a ltransit Table 2:Annual Funding Requests Approved Agreements FY20 FY21 FY22 General Assessment $ 49,324 $ 61,953 $ 67,526 Service Assessment $ 99,349 $ 206,351 $ 325,252 Capital Assessment $ 0 $ 0 $ 12,869 Special Assessment $ 169,184 $ 173,414 $ 170,000 Total Provided $ 317,857 $ 442,706* $ 575,647 *Later adjusted to $272,284 to reflect delayed start of new service. The FY2023 funding request is proposed not to exceed $884,917. This amount supports existing intercounty and specialized transit services, new local fixed route services, cash reserve contributions and matching funds for capital projects. Funding requests have grown due to several reasons. • New assessments were introduced into the cost allocation methodology as VRT moves to a more sustainable revenue profile, reflecting each jurisdiction's fair share of costs. Capital assessments were not introduced until the FY22 budget cycle, and reserve assessments were not introduced until the current FY23 budget cycle. Service Assessments represent the best indicator in changes to operating budgets and available revenue. • Requests to support 30 Pine route was introduced at a partial year rate in FY2021 and full year rate in FY2022. • Projected fare revenue remains conservative as ridership recovers from pandemic related lows. • FY2023 operating cost increases are due to labor, health insurance, battery leases, parts and fuel. 4 Page 260 Item#15. val leyreg i o n a ltransit Ridership Review Although COVID 19 continues to suppress ridership across VRT's services, we are starting to see ridership return. We have seen fixed route ridership grow systemwide for the last two quarters. Table 4 below shows the change in ridership over the first two quarters of FY2O22. We expect ridership will continue to grow slowly as we continue to recover from the impacts of COVID 19. Table 4: Quarterly Ridership Changes FY2021 FY2022 Q1 Q2 Q1 %A Q2 (prelim) %A Fixed Route Total System Total 228,385 214,333 242,012 6.0% 253,884 18.5% 40* 2,731 2,782 2,960 8.4% 3,257 17.1% 42* 5,200 4,743 5,352 2.9% 4,799 1.2% Specialized Harvest 1,950 2,242 3,339 71.2% 3,600 60.6% Rides 2 Wellness* 1,734 1,314 1,151 -33.6% 1,364 3.8% Meridian Senior Center 250 292 809 223.6% 678 132.2% Veterans Transportation - - 24 N/A 14 N/A *Routes 40, 42 and Rides 2 Wellness service all serve more than just Meridian. Meridian's estimated share of ridership on these services is 20%, 16%and 53% respectively. Ridership Projections Transit services typically take anywhere from 12 to 24 months to "mature." Travel behaviors can be slow to change and the maturation process allows time for the public to become aware of and begin to utilize the new service. This can be particularly true when introducing new service in areas that have never had service before. Using similar routes, VRT has prepared ridership projections for the new service but it is unclear how much COVID-19 will impact those estimates. Ridership projections for the new service was based on experience with similar routes but ridership projections can be unreliable in the best of times coming out of COVID Q1 FY 2022 Q4 2022 Q4 2023 Connected and mature Fixed Route 30 600 900 3,500 7,500 5 Page 261 Item#16. E IDIAN'-'---- JAMu AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Works: Two Percent (2%) Water and Sewer Utility Rate Increase Discussion Page 262 Item#16. C� fIENL ANHO MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Workshop Agenda From: Laurelei McVey, Public Works Meeting Date: May 24, 2022 Presenter: Laurelei McVey, Public Works Estimated Time: 10 minutes Topic: 2%Water and Sewer Utility Rate Increase Recommended Council Action: Approval to bring a resolution forward for a 2%water and sewer utility rate increase and hold a public hearing. Background: The City of Meridian has not increased its water or sewer utility rates since 2014. Our utility rates remain some of the lowest in the Treasure Valley due to our methodical and proactive planning and budgeting. The City's "save before you spend" philosophy has allowed the City to remain debt free while still funding significant projects that have enabled the City to maintain high levels of services while also meeting ever increasing state and federal regulations. Due to the continued increase in operational and capital costs, the Public Works Department is recommending a 2% increase to the water and sewer utility bill, effective June 15th, 2022. This represents an increase of approximately$1.22/month on the average customer's bill. A public hearing on the rate increase resolution will be scheduled on June 14th, 2022. Questions related to this proposal should be directed to Laurelei McVey, Public Works, lmcveyPmeridiancity.org, 208-985-1259. Page 263