Loading...
1 - Union 93 CZC, Response Letter (2021-10-27) 1 October 27, 2021 Alan Tiefenbach Associate Planner, City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway, Suite 102 Meridian, ID 83642 RE: UNION 93 CZC RESPONSE #2 – EAST AND WEST BUILDINGS Alan, We thank you for your continued work on our CZC applications for the Union 93 project. This letter provides responses to the City’s CZC review comments from your e-mail dated 8-6-21. This letter provides responses to the comments or indicates where responses can be found. Ninety days have passed since the previous CZC submittal. This long timeframe between responses is because we have invested considerable time trying to incorporate changes based what we have heard from City review comments, and also based on the feedback we heard from a meeting with the MDC board on August 24th. Response to Comment #1 Per the recommendation in Comment #1, Galena met with the MDC board on August 24th. The conversation was productive and helped guide our work over follow weeks to create the current design, which takes into account several of the board’s principal concerns, including: • Better integrating the parking podium levels with the levels where units are located • Creating more visual interest with more variation of the roof plane • Muting the terracotta color previously proposed, and incorporating a brick more similar to others within the Old Town area Response to Comment #2 Elevations have been provided. 2 Response to Comment #3 Unit balconies • West Building – 56 balconies with an average square footage of 55 SF = 3,080 SF of private balcony space. These balconies are shown in blue by building under the “Amenity Analysis” section of the architectural response. • East Building – 42 balconies with an average square footage of 55 SF = 2,310 SF of private balcony space. These balconies are shown in blue by building under the “Amenity Analysis” section of the architectural response. Shared Residential Terraces • West Building – The west building provides an 11,059 SF shared residential terrace space. This space is connected directly to the lodge area, and provides different outdoor seating options, fire pits, barbecues, a game area, and a number of different plantings to create a natural feel. • East Building – The east building provides two shared terraces. The larger, north-facing terrace is 8,867 SF. It connects directly from the east building lodge and provides outdoor seating, fire pits, barbecues, and rich plantings. The smaller, east-facing terrace is 6,905 SF and will provide an area geared toward pets, as well as seating areas, fire pits, and a natural feel through significant landscaping. Interior Amenities • As summarized in the architectural response packet included with the submission, each building provides 15,000+ SF of interior residential amenities. • East Building amenities include: o A ~2,000 SF lodge on the third floor that opens onto the shared residential terrace. The lodge includes seating areas, a game area for billiards and the like, a kitchen for food preparation and serving. o The principal lobby where building leasing and management services will be found, which will serve both buildings. This area will also provide mail and package pickup areas for tenants of the east building. o A co-working area where residents can work on-site but away from their units o A 401 SF roof deck on the northwest corner of the top floor provides an indoor seating/kitchen area, with outdoor seating areas that will provide expansive views of the northern Treasure Valley • West Building interior amenities include: o A ~1,900 SF lodge on the third floor that opens onto the shared residential terrace. The lodge includes seating areas, a game area for billiards and the like, a kitchen for food preparation and serving. o A ~4,500 SF fitness area provides 20+ types of exercise equipment, a yoga/spinning studio, a large free weight area, and restrooms and lockers. This fitness area serves both buildings. 3 o A residential lobby connecting tenants to building management, as well as mailboxes and package pickup areas o A co-working area where residents can work on-site but outside of their units o Bike storage and tenant storage areas o A 476 SF roof deck on the northeast corner of the top floor provides an indoor seating/kitchen area, with outdoor seating areas that will provide expansive views of the northern Treasure Valley Specific Exterior Amenities As shown in the architectural response packet, outside of the public rights of way, there is over 62,000 SF of exterior space that can be enjoyed by residents and the public, composed of the plaza, the pathways and walkways between and around the buildings, and also the rails-to-trails connection on the south. Other specific exterior amenities to mention include: • Pet Area – A 1,392 SF pet area is provided on the south side of the west building, which will serve both buildings. • Play Area – A 2,584 SF playground area, geared toward children, will also be provided on the south side of the west building, and will serve residents of both buildings. Summary Access. Each building provides tenants with roof terraces, with two at the larger east building. Each building has a lobby with building services, access to a roof deck, a co-working area, tenant storage, bike parking and pet wash areas. Access to the management office (east building) and the fitness center (west building) were planned with access closer to the central common area, for quick access by tenants of either building. The pet and playground areas are located within a sort of alcove between the west building and the multi-use pathway. We feel that we have provided a similar experience in each building, with good access to amenities for all tenants. Benefits of Aggregation. An attempt could have been made to spread the common areas—specifically the exterior common areas—onto more floors or further throughout the project. But doing so would require each space to be smaller. With required areas for circulation and access, these separated spaces would have been less efficient and provided less net usable area for tenants. In addition, one of the purposes of these spaces is to provide a social environment for tenants. The larger aggregated spaces encourage larger groups that help tenants feel a part of a social environment. We feel that the larger spaces make more efficient areas, encourage socializing and congregating, and are located a short elevator ride from our tenants on the higher floors. Tenants on the higher floors have closest access to the roof decks in each building. And the project has been designed so that ground level exterior amenity areas surround the buildings, providing good access to all tenants. 4 Response to Comment #4 Included with this response (found in the architectural response packet) is the Request for Proposals planned to be sent to a group of artists who have worked on similar projects. This document was sent to MDC and the City for review on 10/22/21, and we plan to distribute it shortly. We would include a representative from MDC on the committee to select the successful applicant. We have budgeted $300,000 for two pieces which would bookend the plaza on the east and west sides, the most prominent of which we envision for the corner of 3rd and Broadway. Prior to seeing artist concepts, we are hesitant to provide too much in term of specifics, although we would envision a minimum height (especially of the piece at 3rd & Broadway) to be 12-15 feet high. The art pieces will need to incorporate elements that evoke part of the history of the community and the site, while incorporating a modern feel. The history of railways at the site will be a potential point of inspiration, as will the agricultural history of Meridian (with the grain silos across the street as strong reference points). The budget for the art pieces will assure the pieces will be significant and substantial. The participation of MDC will assure the themes and appropriate. Response to Comment #5 Updated coverage pages and development data tables are provided. There is one cover sheet for each of the west and the east buildings, since additional and more detailed parking information was provided. We have updated the verbiage to reflect “required” parking. Each building has appropriate parking for its use, so no building is relying on parking stalls of the other to meet code requirements. Parking By Building To summarize the parking by building, as shown on the cover sheets: • The west building provides 195 on-site parking stalls, with 180 required o This leaves 15 parking stalls above code in the west building • The east building provides 436 parking stalls, with 197 required o This leaves 239 parking stalls above code in the east building o Of the parking above code in the east building, 50 stalls are planned to be allocated to MDC for replacement of the COMPASS/VRT building parking lot. o Reducing the parking stalls above code in the east building by the 50 allocated for COMPASS/VRT leaves 189 stalls above code in the east building 5 Aggregate Project Parking We add below the following table to summarize, at an aggregate level, the parking at Union 93. To summarize the parking in aggregate: • Combined, both buildings provide 631 on-site parking stalls. o 377 are required by code, and 50 stalls are allocated for COMPASS/VRT o This leaves parking above code and above those for COMPASS/VRT at 204 stalls • Existing off-site parking stalls on Broadway (angled) and 3rd Street (parallel) are 53 stalls o Union 93’s development would provide 30 total stalls along Broadway & 3rd Street  This will result in an on-street reduction of 23 stalls  Union 93’s 204 “excess” parking stalls will help make up for this reduction in on- street parking AGGREGATE PARKING SUMMARY - ON SITE Union 93 Stalls Provided - West Building 195 Stalls Provided - East Building 436 Total Stalls (East and West Buildings)631 Code Required Stalls - West Building 180 Code Required Stalls - East Building 197 Total Stalls (East and West Buildings)377 Excess Parking Above Code (Both Buildings)254 Stalls Planned for COMPASS/VRT Use 50 Excess Parking Above Code After COMPASS/VRT 204 AGGREGATE PARKING SUMMARY - OFF SITE Union 93 Existing Street Parking (Angled Parking - Broadway)38 Existing Street Parking (Parallel Parking - 3rd Street)15 Total Existing Street Parking 53 Union 93 Street Parking - Broadway 20 Union 93 Street Parking - 3rd Street 10 Total Union 93 Street Parking 30 Net Decrease in Off-Site Parking 23 6 Response to Comment #6 Additional modulation at the base of the columns has been added. Details are provided in the architectural response included in our submission. Responses to Comments #7 through #10 Responses to these comments are included in the architectural response document included in our submission. Throughout this document, we show the new elevations and images from the 3D model alongside our previous submission, to clearly present the changes that have been made. The changes on the south elevation are particularly significant, and we feel will provide a much better visual entry into downtown from the south. Thank you for your work, and please reach out to me with any questions. Sincerely, Mike Chidester Galena Opportunity Fund 999 W. Main Street, Suite 1400 Boise, ID 83702 mike@galenafund.com