PZ - Neighborhood Mtg BALL
VENTURES
AH LQUIST
February 22, 2021
Dear Neighbor:
We are in the process of submitting an application to the City of Meridian for
Annexation, Rezone, a Conditional Use Permit, Preliminary Plat and Modification to a
Development Agreement with respect to a 25.9 acre project located at S. Rolling Hill Dr.,
Meridian, ID, 83642. In compliance with Meridian City Code 11-5A-6, we have scheduled
a "Neighborhood Meeting." The Neighborhood meeting is for informational purposes only.
During the meeting we will describe the proposed project and answer any questions you
may have. The meeting is not a public hearing before a governing body of the City.
Instead, the meeting is a pre-application requirement, and the City does not have the
formal application yet. Once our application has been submitted and processed, the City
will schedule a public hearing, and you will receive notice of the public hearing date via
postal mail, newspaper publication, and/or public hearing signage on the project site.
In light of the Covid-19 pandemic and the need for social distancing, the City of Meridian
has approved the timing of this permitting this Neighborhood Meeting and its remote occurrence.
Below is information regarding the date and time for the Zoom Meeting:
Date: Wednesday, March 3, 2021
Time: 6 pm — 7 pm
How to Join the Zoom Meeting:
1. Enter the following URL in your web browser:
https://bvadev.zoom.us/j/96654028620?pwd=Z3IOdWQwVVppdnZSaUITZjBuNW
FrQT09
2. Click the button to hear audio through your computer or via your cell phone.
3. If you wish to listen through your telephone:
a. Call: +1 253 215 8782
b. Enter Meeting ID: 966 5402 8620
c. Enter Password: 820422
2775 W. Navigator Dr., Suite 220, Meridian, ID 83642 1 208.616.1050 1 www.bvadev.com
Project Description: The property owner intends to make the following
applications to the City of Meridian related to certain real property located adjacent
to the northern terminus of Rolling Hills Drive, south of Interstate 84, all presently
located in unincorporated Ada County: (a) the annexation of 25.9 acres (the
"Property") presently located adjacent to the boundary of the City of Meridian,
designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map as Mixed Use
Regional; (b) the zoning of the Property as General Retail & Service Commercial
(C-G); (c) an amendment to the existing DA H-2019-0005 recorded as Instrument
No. 2019-037825, to revise the Conceptual Development Plan and Phasing Plan
to reflect the incorporation of the Property into the larger project; (d) a conditional
use permit application associated with the development of 396 unit apartment
community on a portion of the Property; (e) a preliminary plat application platting
the Property and replating a portion of the existing Rackham Subdivision; and (f)
a potential application to the Ada County Highway District to vacate that portion of
Rolling Hills Drive within the Property.
If you have any comments or questions prior to the meeting, or would like the Zoom
meeting URL emailed to you, please contact me at (208) 616-1050 or
jackson(a�bvadev.com. You may also send correspondence to the address shown below.
Sincerely,
JA.Ckvn UaVerte�
2
Page 1 of 1
Neighborhood Meeting Sign-in Sheet
Rackham Subdivision No. 2/Eagle View Apartments
March 3, 2021 6:00 to 7:00 PM
Zoom Neighborhood Meeting
Name (printed) Address Telephone Email
Jackson Cleverly 2775 W. Navigator#220 jackson@bvadev.com
Meridian, ID 83642
John Gabrielsen 2929 W. Navigator#400 john@brightoncorp.com
Meridian, ID 83642
Amy Wattles 1360 S. Rolling Hill
Drive Meridian, ID
83642
Joan Johnston 12638 W. Castlewood
Drive Boise, ID 83709
Pam Haynes 1235 S. Rolling Hill
Drive Meridian, ID
83642
Jeremy Tucker 1021 S. Winthrop Way 208-573-8713
Boise, ID 83709
BRIGHTON
NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
Eagle View Landing
SUMMARY
Prior to submitting applications to the City of Meridian and Ada County Highway District for Eagle View
Landing, a Neighborhood Meeting will be held to present the project and site plan located on S. Rolling
Hill Drive, Meridian, ID 83642
MEETING DATE,TIME& LOCATION
The Neighborhood Meeting will be held VIRTUALLY on Wednesday, September 1st at 6 pm.
You are invited to participate online via Zoom or by telephone by using the following meeting
credentials:
ZOOM TELEPHONE
https://zoom.us/join (346) 248-7799 or(669) 900-6833
Meeting ID: 867 6165 1112 Meeting ID: 867 6165 1112
Passcode: 83713 Passcode: 83713
If you are unable to VIRTUALLY attend, for more information please contact:
Josh Beach
Brighton Development, Inc. ` ~�
2929 W. Navigator Dr., Ste.400
i - t
Meridian, ID 83642 - -- — —
(208) 8713812
jbeach@brightoncorp.com '
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Comp Plan: Mixed-Use Regional
Current Zoning: C-G (Meridian); �►
R1 (Ada County);
RUT(Ada County) ,.�. _ •�, ,'" ���
APPLICATIONS: Annexation �"' �' + ,•�������
Preliminary Plat +
Conditional Use Permit I�•+ ' I
Right-of-Way Vacation , Ii. tti '�
Total Land: 29.70 acres �'�` ' �•-' F''�:'NMR
Present Use: Vacant
PROPOSAL/ DESCRIPTION
Applications for Eagle View Landing—a 29.70 acre mixed-use development near the intersection of
Eagle and Overland Roads (as depicted above)will soon be submitted to the City of Meridian.The
request includes Annexation of 25.76 acres, a Preliminary Plat consisting of 8 lots on 29.70 acres, and a
Conditional Use Permit for a 396-unit multi-family development on 15.94 acres. Included in this
neighborhood meeting, but with separate public hearings and approval processes is a request to the Ada
County Highway District to vacate approximately 1,089 feet of Rolling Hill Drive.The Vacation request is
only for the portion of Rolling Hill Drive that abuts the property as shown in the above graphic; more
specifically,the portion north of 1235 Rolling Hill Drive.
BRIGHTON—Creating GREAT Places—2929 W. Navigator Drive,Ste.400, Meridian, ID 83642
www.brightoncorp.com 208-378-4000
September 1, 2021
Page 2
Eagle View Landing Conceptual Site Plan
•m :.
118114X3 31JS
1
c'JNI� SIIIH ONIIION-EJNIdNVI MMA MOV3 a ; q
1 nr;rr r I>
4}I
' 1
- � I
I
ITMTnTTlTnTrN
16
j in
1------------------ --/ — ,_ _ ,• Y
I I
IFIR
i
t I t t I ,
1I I I I I I I I I I I u 111 jil I I I I I I u I I I I I I I I I I I I uIII
� I
I 1 O I
I , ,
I
} I
�i T iii tt it r I
--- _
Page 1 of 1
Neighborhood Meeting Sign-in Sheet
Rackham Subdivision No. 2/Eagle View Apartments
September 1, 2021 6:00 to 7:00 PM
Zoom Neighborhood Meeting
Name (printed) Address Telephone Email
Eric Cedergren 1260 S. Rolling Hills
Drive Meridian, ID 83642
Larene Berthelson 4220 E. View Circle
Meridian ID 83642
Amy Wattles 1360 S. Rolling Hill
Drive Meridian, ID
83642
Mike Blowers 1325 S. Rolling Hills Dr.
Meridian, ID 83642
Josh Beach 2929 W. Navigator Dr.
#400 Meridian, ID 83642
Jon Wardle 2929 W. Navigator Dr.
#400 Meridian, ID 83642
John Gabrielsen 2929 W.Navigator Dr.#400
Meridian ID 83642
Jeremy Tucker 1021 S.Winthrop Way Boise,ID 83709
Lynne Tucker 1021 S.Winthrop Way Boise,ID 83709
Jim Laursen 3775 E.Onyx Street Meridian,ID 83646
Eagle View Landing Neighborhood Meeting
Date: 21.09.01
Time: 6pm MT
Location: Zoom (recorded)
Attendees
• Jon Wardle
• Josh Beach
• John Gabrielsen
• Jeremy Tucker
• Lynne Tucker
• Amy Wattles
• Eric Cedergren
• Jim Laursen
• 208.888.7204
• Pixel
Presentation
• Jon Wardle (attached)
Q&A
• Amy Wattles
• Q: Rolling Hills will continue to be an exit point for the apartments, correct?
o A: Correct, rolling hills is a public road and we continue to access that
• Q: So part of the proposal will be to extend the road into neighboring properties?
o A:The hope is that we can do these improvements within the existing right of way 50'
and 25-30' of existing asphalt.
• Q: So the roadway improvements are required for the project?
o A: It would enhance the ability to make the roadway pedestrian safe
• Q: So there would be sidewalks put in for the new residents
o A:Yes—it would be a long-term enhancement with existing and future residents
• Q: Have you submitted a traffic study to ACHD?
o A:Yes—but the final study will be released to the public once approved
• Q: Can you share contact at ACHD so the neighbors can follow up with the reviewer?
o Yes—Mindy Wallace
• Eric Cedergren
• Q: How do you see perceive this project as an enhancement or a negative to neighboring
residential properties
o A: It will be an enhancement of the overall area. Will it be a big change? For sure, in
terms of property values. When changes like this occur to higher density, your property
would be valued similar to those if another developer wanted to do similar
• Q: What if the other properties decided to do something detrimental to your property?
o A: Clearly there are a variety of uses that could occur but they would go through the
same process that we are currently going through
• Amy Wattles
• Q:The possibility of future developments of Brighton?
o A: Is Brighton planning to do future developments to the south?We aren't but what I
was saying is there is potential for redevelopment to occur should the neighbors decide
to go through the public hearing process as we are trying to do?
• Q: So no BVA?Other Developers?
o A: Now Amy, BVA may have had those conversations. I don't know of any additional
conversations. We aren't proposing anything south but we don't know what
conversations any of you have had with BVA.
• Q: Are you planning to do anything on view circle?
o A: It's a cul-de-sac so we don't have anything planned but where it connects with the
road might be the extent of our improvements
• Mike Blowers
• Q: What if any was the findings regarding our street pertaining the traffic study?
o A: We have submitted a traffic study to the highway district regarding the overall. It
appears that the needed improvements would be some additional asphalt and
curbs/sidewalks, and gutters along rolling hills. Current asphalt is 25-30' and needs to be
widened to 50' in the existing right of way. We would need to coordinate with each one
of you on access points to make sure it's maintained and improved?
• Q: Was there a decision that those improvements need to be made?
o A:The highway district will make conditions of approval and it is our assumption that
they'll require sidewalks to Overland Road
• Q: Will there be a signal
o A: If they do put another signal in it will be accessed further east, not rolling hills
• Q: As someone who has lived here for a decade. I'm curious how a traffic light wouldn't be part
of this development?
o A: Rolling Hills will have access to the stoplight off Silverstone. We understand your
concern and ACHD is reviewing these items before we submit our application.An ACHD
representative will be present for the public hearing
• Q: No one wants to address our question of whether or not the traffic light will be installed at
rolling halls
• Amy Walttles
• Q: It was my prior understanding that Rolling Hills was not required for emergency access.
o A: We are planning to make a connection to Rolling Hills and creating a couple of access
points in and out. It is a requirement to have dual access for the overall development.
There was an original condition for rolling hills access
• Q: So how many points of Access do you have here
o A: Rackham, Silverstone, and Rolling Hills
• Q: Why are you guys adding sidewalks because the neighbors aren't happy about it. We want to
direct traffic the other way.
o A: Bottom line, even if it was the original project, rolling hills would connect through
• Mike Blowers
• Q: So a dead end it can't be a fire ballasted road?
o A: No, it would be required to have full access
• Q: BVA's owner said we hope we never have to use rolling hills for full access. What made this
change
o A: with the addition of the property that's being added, another point of unrestricted
access is required.
• Q: What is the defining attribute that's requiring the extra access?
o A: I think it's total distance from Overland Road. I know how everyone feels about
• Q:That's putting it extremely likely;This is an effective change in lifestyle
o A: I hear you.
• Q: Is there any middle ground?
o A: No,the intent is to access rolling hills. I don't believe we'll land on something else
from ACHD. I don't want to be dishonest with you but I don't believe that will be the
case.
• Q: As neighbors, this project is going ahead regardless and it's frustrating.The city has been very
clear that these homes would not be annexed.
o A: I know you're frustrated, and we appreciate the candor. We have these meetings and
public hearings, so I encourage you to come to the public hearing and voice your
concerns.
• Q: I knew these were the type of answers we'd get. I thought it was going to be assisting us
through the construction phase of the project. I know what I'm going to do to make sure to
increase my family's safety to reduce traffic.
o A: I do think that improvements of the roadway from Silverstone over be the designated
haul route from the boundary into the site.
Conclusion
• Jon Wardle: We plan to submit a formal application to the city in the next 60 days.