The URL can be used to link to this page

2021-09-28 Work Session CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION \[AMENDED\] City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, September 28, 2021 at 4:30 PM Minutes ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Councilwoman Liz Strader Councilman Joe Borton Councilman Brad Hoaglun Councilman Treg Bernt Councilwoman Jessica Perreault Councilman Luke Cavener Mayor Robert E. Simison ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] Approved (except Item 12) Motion to approve items 1 - 11 and 13 - 17 made by Councilman Bernt, Seconded by Councilman Hoaglun. Voting Yea: Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Bernt, Councilwoman Perreault, Councilman Cavener 1. Approve Minutes of the September 14, 2021 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the September 14, 2021 City Council Regular Meeting 3. Approve Minutes of the September 21, 2021 City Council Work Session 4. Approve Minutes of the September 21, 2021 City Council Regular Meeting 5. Final Plat for Artemisia Subdivision (FP-2021-0046) by Engineering Solutions, Located at the Northwest Corner of W. Overland Rd. and S. Linder Rd. 6. Final Plat for TM Frontline (FP-2021-0047) by Brighton Development, Inc., Generally Located on the South Side of W. Franklin Rd., Approximately ¼ Mile West of S. Linder Rd. 7. Final Order for Chewie Subdivision (FP-2021-0036) by Kent Brown Planning, Located on the North Side of W. Franklin Rd., Midway Between N. Ten Mile Rd. and N. Linder Rd. 8. Final Order for Prevail Subdivision No. 3 (FP-2021-0044) by Schultz Development, Located Approximately ¼ Mile South of E. Amity Rd., East of S. Meridian Rd. 9. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Briar Ridge Subdivision (H-2021-0036) by Gem State Planning, Located on the West Side of Meridian Rd. Between W. Lake Hazel Rd. and W. Amity Rd., Directly South of the Mid-Mile Point 10. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Bright Star Care Meridian (H-2021-0052) by Hatch Design Architecture, Located at 3336 and 3340 N. Meridian Rd. 11. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decision and Order for Request for City Council Review of the Planning Director’s Determination that a Reduced 5-Foot Interior Setback Specified in UDC Table 11-2B-3 Did Not Apply to a New Structure Proposed for Construction on the Property Located at 2560 S. Meridian Road, by Clark Wardle (CR-2021-0003) 12. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Wells Street Assisted Living/Andorra Subdivision (H-2021-0024) by Jamie Koenig of Babcock Design, Located at 675, 715 and 955 S. Wells St. Vacated 13. Approval of Fiscal Year 2022 Purchase Order to Ferguson Enterprises for Water Meters and Related Equipment for the Not-to-Exceed Amount of $1,373,458.00 14. Cooperative Agreement Between the City of Meridian and Valley Regional Transit for Fiscal Year 2022 Public Transportation Financial Contribution 15. Market Labor Fee Contract Amendment for Fiscal Year 2022 Between City of Meridian and Republic Services of Idaho for Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services 16. Recycling Processing Fee Contract Amendment Fiscal Year 2022 Between City of Meridian and Republic Services of Idaho for Solid Waste Collection Services 17. Resolution No. 21-2286: A Resolution Adopting the Fiscal Year 2022 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection Services; Authorizing Finance Department to Collect Such Fees; and Providing an Effective Date ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS \[Action Item\] 18. Public Works Department: 2021 Environmental Excellence Awards 19. Parks and Recreation Department: Teen Activities Night Pilot Program Recap 20. Parks and Recreation Department: Draft Urban Forestry Management Plan Presentation and Discussion ADJOURNMENT 5:36 pm Item#1. Meridian City Council Work Session September 28, 2021. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 4:30 p.m., Tuesday, September 28, 2021, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Joe Borton, Luke Cavener, Treg Bernt, Jessica Perreault, Brad Hoaglun and Liz Strader. Also present: Chris Johnson, Bill Nary, Steve Siddoway, Mike Barton, Matt Perkins, Shawn Harper, Joe Bongiorno and Dean Willis. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE Liz Strader _X_ Joe Borton _X_ Brad Hoaglun _X_Treg Bernt X Jessica Perreault _X Luke Cavener _X_ Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Council, call the meeting to order. For the record it is Tuesday, September 28th, at 4:30 p.m. We will begin this afternoon's City Council Work Session with roll call attendance. Johnson: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Councilman Borton. We can see you, but not hear you here. Councilman Borton. He is frozen. He is here. Councilman Cavener? Cavener: Here. Johnson: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Here. Johnson: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Here. Johnson: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: Here. Johnson: Mayor Simison. Simison: Here. Next item is adoption of the agenda. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Page 4 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. September 28,2021 Page 2 of 19 Bernt: I move that we adopt the agenda as published. Hoaglun: Second the motion. Simison: Joe, we can hear you and -- Borton: I cannot. Simison: You cannot hear us? Borton: I hear like every third word. Hoaglun: Let me count. One, three, five, seven -- Borton: I hear laughter. No, it's gone. Schultz: This is Sarah Schultz. I hear the same thing. It's on and off. Simison: Can we reboot real quick? (Brief pause. Technical difficulties) Simison: Why don't we go ahead and reset if that works. We don't have to recall to order, but we will resume the meeting with a new roll call attendance. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Simison: Next time is adoption of the agenda. Bernt: Mr. -- Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: Grateful for the opportunity this fine afternoon to make a motion to adopt the agenda as published. Hoaglun: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as published. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it and the agenda is adopted. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] Page 5 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. September 28,2021 Page 3 of 19 1. Approve Minutes of the September 14, 2021 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the September 14, 2021 City Council Regular Meeting 3. Approve Minutes of the September 21, 2021 City Council Work Session 4. Approve Minutes of the September 21, 2021 City Council Regular Meeting 5. Final Plat for Artemisia Subdivision (FP-2021-0046) by Engineering Solutions, Located at the Northwest Corner of W. Overland Rd. and S. Linder Rd. 6. Final Plat for TM Frontline (FP-2021-0047) by Brighton Development, Inc., Generally Located on the South Side of W. Franklin Rd., Approximately '/4 Mile West of S. Linder Rd. 7. Final Order for Chewie Subdivision (FP-2021-0036) by Kent Brown Planning, Located on the North Side of W. Franklin Rd., Midway Between N. Ten Mile Rd. and N. Linder Rd. 8. Final Order for Prevail Subdivision No. 3 (FP-2021-0044) by Schultz Development, Located Approximately '/4 Mile South of E. Amity Rd., East of S. Meridian Rd. 9. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Briar Ridge Subdivision (H- 2021-0036) by Gem State Planning, Located on the West Side of Meridian Rd. Between W. Lake Hazel Rd. and W. Amity Rd., Directly South of the Mid-Mile Point 10. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Bright Star Care Meridian (H- 2021-0052) by Hatch Design Architecture, Located at 3336 and 3340 N. Meridian Rd. 11. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decision and Order for Request for City Council Review of the Planning Director's Determination that a Reduced 5-Foot Interior Setback Specified in UDC Table 11-213-3 Did Not Apply to a New Structure Proposed for Construction on the Property Located at 2560 S. Meridian Road, by Clark Wardle (CR-2021-0003) 13. Approval of Fiscal Year 2022 Purchase Order to Ferguson Enterprises for Water Meters and Related Equipment for the Not-to-Exceed Page 6 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. September 28,2021 Page 4 of 19 Amount of$1,373,458.00 14. Cooperative Agreement Between the City of Meridian and Valley Regional Transit for Fiscal Year 2022 Public Transportation Financial Contribution 15. Market Labor Fee Contract Amendment for Fiscal Year 2022 Between City of Meridian and Republic Services of Idaho for Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services 16. Recycling Processing Fee Contract Amendment Fiscal Year 2022 Between City of Meridian and Republic Services of Idaho for Solid Waste Collection Services 17. Resolution No. 21-2286: A Resolution Adopting the Fiscal Year 2022 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection Services; Authorizing Finance Department to Collect Such Fees; and Providing an Effective Date Simison: Next item is the Consent Agenda. Bernt: Like the adoption of the agenda, I equally am grateful for the opportunity to make a motion to approve the Consent Agenda, with one item being taken off, No. 12. Item 12 being stricken from the agenda. For the Mayor to sign and for the Clerk to attest. Hoaglun: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda by removing Item 12. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Nays? The ayes have it and the Consent Agenda is approved. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] Simison: So, we did move Item 12 off the Consent Agenda. So, do we need to take action to dispose of it further and remove it altogether at this point in time? Nary: Mr. Mayor, we will bring it back at a future date. So, we don't need to do anything other than that. Simison: So, I don't need to -- since it wasn't moved off the Consent Agenda. We deleted it. There is a difference. Nary: Yeah. We didn't move it off to talk about it. We deleted it, so -- because we will bring it back at a later date. Page 7 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. September 28,2021 Page 5 of — DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS [Action Item] 18. Public Works Department: 2021 Environmental Excellence Awards Simison: All right. Perfect. Then we will move on to Item 18, which is for the Public Works Department, 2021 Environmental Excellence Awards, and I will turn this over to Jason. Korn: Again, thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. So, this is my fourth year being involved with Environmental Excellence Awards and every year I'm excited and impressed when reviewing the nominations put in from the community with our awards committee and this year was no different. The awards give the city the opportunity to recognize and promote innovation and hard work for our community members and environmental protection and, hopefully, inspire others to get involved in efforts of pollution prevention, resource conservation and a path towards greater sustainability. One of the innovations from last year's awards that came from our challenges with in- person meetings was developing videos where you can actually see our awardees in action and with that we will play our first video for our first awardee, which will be Micro 100 Tool and, hopefully, that video will start. Yeah. Johnson: J.R., did you click the share sound with video? You might have to restart. J.R., this is Chris. If you can hear me when you press share before you pick the thing at the very bottom there is a share sound button below the screen share. Choose that and, then, try again. J.R.: I have share screen. Share sound is on the video or on the -- Johnson: It's on the same -- once you hit share screen it shows all your options and it's at the very bottom of that. There is a little checkbox for share sound. J.R.: Okay. Let me -- let me redo it and see. Sorry about that. (Video played.) Korn: Thanks for bearing -- bearing with us through the technical difficulties. Dugan, can we have you come up. So, we are presenting the 2021 Environmental Excellence Award to Micro 100 Tool for efforts in hazardous waste reduction and pollution prevention. Henderson: Well, thank you. Appreciate this. This is -- this goes to the team of Micro 100. You know, they really worked towards defining a process that is acceptable to the -- to the local community. So, a lot of work goes into doing this and we just appreciate this, being recognized for the time that we have spent doing this and we will continue doing more. Thank you. Korn: All right. Hopefully it goes a little smoother playing the next video for our next awardee, which is Republic Services, and if we could get that cued up and shared. Page 8 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. September 28,2021 Page 6 1 - (Video played.) Korn: All right. Thanks. And not to be repetitive, but I would like to present the 2021 Environmental Excellence Award to Republic Services for commitment to responsible resource use and reducing emissions, utilizing reuse water, and providing opportunities for waste diversion. So, Republic Services is a great community partner, really defied us to try and put them in a category for this award. So, we have several categories that we could have nominated them for. So, congratulations. Klein: I guess I will leave this on. I just want to say thank you to Jason and the entire team up here, Mayor and Council and Solid Waste Advisory Commission, because we have the good fortune of sitting on that committee and really hearing feedback from the community on what we can do to better serve everyone and so the purple pipe is the latest advancement, I guess, that we have been able to -- to really tap into and we are just grateful that we are able to help the city move in the direction of the residents and the leadership. So, thank you. Korn: All right. And we will be accepting nominations for the 2022 environmental excellence awards. So, if there are any good ideas out there, anyone in the public or in the audience today, please, go to our website meridiancity.org and look for Environmental Excellence Awards. Thank you. Simison: Thank you, Jason, and the team and, Council Woman Strader, anything you would like to add as a -- I'm sure there would be. Strader: Thank you. I just wanted to say how proud we are to have these companies in our community working with us and moving us forward on these environmental initiatives and I think it says a lot about the values that we hold as a community when we see that reflected back and just want to express my appreciation for Micro 100, Republic, and the SWAC and Jason and everybody. Thanks. 19. Parks and Recreation Department: Teen Activities Night Pilot Program Recap Simison: Ditto. Thank you very much. Next item on the agenda was number 19, our Parks and Recreation Department Teen Activities Night pilot program recap. We will hear from Renee. White: Hello. How are you all? Hey -- I -- good. Good. I am back to talk about Teen Night. I was asked to give a bit of a recap to everybody. I came in April and suggested we added some activities for teens to help maybe draw away from the teens that were overwhelming Movie Night. Took some feedback from all of you. Made some revisions to the event. So, we were able to produce, with your support, three different nights. So, we were three consecutive Fridays in August. We had -- this is not moving. We were able to have cornhole, pickleball, ladder ball. We had a company who come and brought virtual reality games and, then, volleyball and basketball. And, of course, we had free Page 9 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. September 28,2021 Page , of ,9 pizza. So, we were graciously donated the pizza by Idaho Pizza Company, which was a significant savings to our overall budget. It was awesome. I agree. One of the highlights was the very first night we had some of our members of our fire department come and interact with the kids. They played some pickleball, some basketball, and just had a good time. They actually taught me pickleball, which I might have to do some more of. It was a lot of fun. One of the other highlights was watching the kids interact themselves. We had quite a few that would encourage the rest of them to come and get volleyball games going, because, of course, you had to have more kids for that. So, I got to see a lot of kids who maybe normally wouldn't be hanging out together hanging out together and having a really good time. The virtual reality was a hit. It -- I would say it also ended up bringing some of -- some kids that maybe wouldn't have come to do some of the other activities. So, you can see them there eating pizza. You originally approved a budget of 4,280 dollars. We did hire security to come, although they ended up being really not necessary. Myself, I was there and, then, we had two staff members from HomeCourt. So, there was virtually no problems. Virtually sounds like there was a problem. There were absolutely no problems. So, we had a great time. So, we did have a savings of a couple thousand dollars. The one thing that we didn't achieve I would say is drawing youth away from Movie Night at all. I think the -- the youth that we served were a completely different clientele that maybe wouldn't have gone to Movie Night or, you know, were looking for something more constructive to do or -- we had quite a few kids come out that were a little shyer, that needed an activity to be --to be brought out or their parents just wouldn't have let them just roam the park with Movie Night. So, I would say we didn't quite achieve our objectives. We had probably 30 to 40 kids at each of the -- of the nights. The ones that came had a great time. It just did not achieve the objectives of drawing them away and, you know, I'm sure we could talk about a lot of different reasons why that's the case, but -- what kind of questions do you all have? Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: Thank you for your presentation. We spoke at the parks tour and I asked you to come and give this update. So, I appreciate you doing it. My question is, you know, maybe we didn't, you know, fulfill the original goal of taking kiddos -- or drawing kiddos away from Movie Night, but maybe we found another opportunity for, you know, other kiddos to be able to come and enjoy the community in a way that they never would before. So, in that regard do you feel like if we were to do this in the future do you feel like it could grow and do you think it would be worth the time? White: I absolutely think it could grow. I -- you know, I think in looking at our overall activities that we offer for teens, we have identified that as a gap. I don't know that I would suggest a Friday night, because I know that we displaced more people than we brought into the facility and so I would really lean on, you know, the facility managers there, Jake and the others, to, you know, pick a night that made sense for what was already taking place in the facility. But, yeah, it was a -- it was a good event. Page 10 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. September 28,2021 Page 8 1 - Bernt: Mr. Mayor, follow up. Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I think that that would -- that would be wise to look at it a little bit deeper. I think that anytime that you can get kiddos engaged in the community, recreating, getting out of their homes and their bedrooms and off their phones and doing productive things, I think is always a huge benefit and there is something to be said about momentum as well, you know. I think 30 or 40 kids year one, given what we spent, is a huge win. What -- you know, who knows what will happen next year when, you know, there is -- maybe we have more time to advertise it and get the word out and really sort of look at the nuts and bolts and maybe what we did right and what we did wrong and make it even better, so -- I'm actually -- I'm not disappointed, I'm actually quite excited about what this may look like in the future. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Sorry, my mic wasn't on. Thank you, Renee, for sharing this with us. Also at the parks tour Renee had mentioned, I believe, about how kind of staffing would work or we had some conversations about how that would work, adding this additional activity. Can you share that with us? Are you comfortable with sharing that about how staff could cover more than one event at a time and if there would be a need for additional, you know, staff that are involved in the process. Not new staff, but -- but existing staff that would need to be at these events that aren't currently. White: Sure. I can't speak to what additional staff or what else would be desired. I can say that I can't be in two places at one time to host -- to host two different events. We were able to do it this time. I trained our volunteer coordinator to run Teen Night, although, you know, when I was done with my event I did go over and make sure that she was okay and helped close. But the -- you know, whether or not the bandwidth exists for other people to take it on, I can't speak to that. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Thanks, Mr. Mayor. I think when we first brought this I was concerned about this as being trying to -- to pull people away from Movie Night. I was -- I didn't think that was going to be able to happen. There is -- to your point there is a whole lot of attractive nuisances that happened at Movie Night and even free pizza can't necessarily pull teenagers away. For Council's benefit, my oldest and a couple of his friends went to it at one night. They really enjoyed themselves. They had a great time. And so I think it Page 11 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. September 28,2021 Page 9 of 19 touches on a point that -- that you kind of touched on, but I didn't want to let pass, which is we need to find more activities for teenagers in our community and so while I agree with you, I don't think that this necessarily checked the box in terms of creating a, you know, deviation from Movie Night, I'm certainly supportive, if you and the department think that flushing this out and maybe kind of looking at it as another activity for teenagers in Meridian, I'm certainly supportive. I also want to be aware -- I think we should all be aware of program creep and there is only one Renee and I'm thinking, okay, if we are not going to do it on Friday nights, what are we going to do on Saturday nights, and I start to have my head shake a little bit. I don't want Renee to give up her Fridays and Saturday nights just to take care of events for our community. So, I think at least for me the door is open to hear kind of what you guys are proposing, whether that's a shift of this or an evolution of this, I think there is a good opportunity to start creating more programming for that 12 to 17 range that we just don't have enough activities for in Meridian. White: Thank you. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Thanks, Renee. Where does that leave us with Movie Night, though? Do you feel like that went okay with the teenagers that were there? Do you want to come back and talk about things to help with that situation later on? It sounds like there is still kind of a need there. White: Yeah. It leaves the problem with the teens really unsolved at Movie Night and I don't currently have any suggestions. I have kind of gone through the gamut. So, yes, it's still an issue. I'm sorry. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, Renee, just thoughts, you know, because I think it was a good approach and a good idea to try. One of the things I thought of that I would like to get your thoughts on is what if you still do it on a Friday night, but have it at a closer location and -- it would cost more money, but like at a Sawtooth Middle School, leasing that gym out. It's closer to that -- to the park, so it might draw -- instead of being clear across town, it frees up HomeCourt for the regular use of activities. I don't know. Your thoughts on something like that. White: I think those things are worth a try. I think the attraction for the teens to come to the park, it's an established meeting place, it's dark, they get the ability to be there with their friends after hours, which isn't something they normally get to do and although we do ask them to sit down and be quiet there, you know, I mean it's -- we have created a wonderful event. It just happens to, you know, bring kids who don't want to watch the Page 12 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. September 28,2021 Page 10 of — movie, they want to hang out. So, I'm really at a loss for how else to change it. Simison: Create a secret movie night someplace else for all the families and adults to go to. White: I love that. How big is your backyard? Simison: Almost big enough. White: Okay. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Follow-up, Renee. Based on -- from the parks tour what we saw, you know, we have official meeting minutes here that -- that everything goes on the record. Do you want to be known as Renee, The Rapper, White on this record or would you like just White? Bernt: Absolutely. White: It was Nae Nae, so -- my rapper name. And no. Thank you. Simison: Council, any additional questions on this item? You know, I think there is still -- this has been going on for as long as I have been with the city and everyone else in terms of the challenges. You know, we went with the Movie Night and could almost not hear the movie because of the teens and -- but to everyone's point, you know, unless we want to be checking IDs and wrist banding and kicking people out and removing them and hire the staff to do it -- you know. But we are -- I think everyone's open for ideas to try to make it so that the movie can be more enjoyed by people there. So, I think -- I think you have an openness to Council for -- if it's resource allocation. Otherwise, what would that feel and look like, so we have that conversation, so -- Harper: Mayor, if I could add a couple of comments. To support Renee, but also I think bring to light some of the safety challenges we have with -- with the Teen Night being on the same night as Movie Night, it really makes it difficult for us to provide the staffing that we would like to have at these events. It just spreads us too thin having them on simultaneously as Movie Night. I think the conversation about Movie Night is a much more lengthy conversation. We have tried lots of things and we still end up having the same -- same challenges. I do think for Movie Night it's -- it's an important event. We are -- we are very supportive of the event. We support Renee and Parks and Rec in that event to the best of our ability, but the fact that it's so porous it makes it very challenging for us to kind of contain the event. We have talked about putting it in one of the ballparks, so that we actually have proper fencing and we have talked about moving it to Discovery Park, but we don't think that that would benefit the youth, because Settlers Park is such Page 13 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. September 28,2021 Page 11 of — a central location in our community. But Movie Night is very challenging. It's -- we -- we have had to remove lots of kids from Movie Night, but, unfortunately, it just pushes them to some of our local businesses, like Jackson's or further into the park where it's darker and it's creating additional issues. Most of them are juvenile-related issues, but still they are issues that we need to deal with, because it's involving illegal activity. So, we are always open to -- to have further discussions. I know Renee and I probably need to get together soon and discuss next -- next season, but, hopefully, we can come back to you guys with some better plans for next year. Simison: All right. With that, thank you very much, Renee. Appreciate it. White: All right. Thank you all. 20. Parks and Recreation Department: Draft Urban Forestry Management Plan Presentation and Discussion Simison: Next item up is Item 20, which is also our Parks and Recs Department. It will be our draft Urban Forest Management Plan presentation and discussion. Mr. Perkins. Perkins: Mr. Mayor and Council Members, thank you for giving me this time to bring you up to date on what we have been working on in the Meridian City Urban Forestry Program. Happy to be here. So, one of the first things that I was given upon taking this job was the assignment to come up with a plan for managing our urban forest in Meridian and this is what I have come up with. First of all, in order to come up with a plan to manage our forest I had to sit down and consider what is an urban forest management plan. What does it do? What do we want it to do? So, I relied on the age old questions of who, what, why, when, where and how and answered each of those. The who I think is obvious at this point. Meridian City Parks and Recreation Department, with myself as the urban forester. And the what would consist of introducing concept and a need for a plan. Then we define specialized terms that were used throughout that plan. And we briefly describe the history and the population and the trends that -- in order to paint a picture of what the city needs and we identified a mission statement and defined objectives of the plan and in the plan we discussed the process that was used to create it. Why do we need an Urban Forest Management Plan? Well, in the plan, we discuss why trees are needed and why they are an important part of -- of the city. We identify the values that are provided by the urban forest and we come up with the reasons why a plan is needed and we address those. The when is yet to be determined. Left that kind of open for zero to ten years. Is this meant to be a ten year management plan? Five years? That's still open to discussion. Where -- the where is -- is pretty obvious. It consists of Meridian parks and city owned properties. All of the trees that are within these areas. The how. How are we going to carry out this urban forest management plan we are doing. So, in the plan I describe the current policies and I describe the current status of the urban forest and identify other stakeholders and partners who are going to be there to help and encourage and participate in some of these ideas that are put forth and evaluate those findings and, then, establish goals and layout strategies to help accomplish those goals. So, the first thing we had to kind of look at was where we are at now. Meridian forestry Page 14 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. September 28,2021 Page 12 of — now consists of one dedicated full-time employee, myself, as the Meridian City arborist. So, a vast majority of our tree work associated with the city managed trees is performed by contractors under my supervision and that includes tree pruning, removal, stump removal and the planting. The city arborist also works with the Planning Department on tree mitigation, code enforcement for nuisance tree issues, responding to public inquiries, coordinating Arbor Day and Christmas tree projects and addressing IPM concerns as well as making Meridian -- making sure that Meridian continues to qualify as a Tree City USA. So, throughout my investigations and coming up with the data to -- to help support this plan, I used our software program called Tree Plotter and in the program one of the cool tools in the program is the ecosystem benefits calculator and it's base -- so the ecosystem benefits of our urban forest are based on and determined by the species, the DBH, and the type of land use. Throughout the inventory for every tree we have on inventory these benefits are calculated and you can see here on your screen that the value that Meridian's urban forest brings to the community is great and far exceeds probably what is most commonly just thought of as the shade that -- and the aesthetic values of trees. Something I would like to point out actually are the stormwater monetary benefits and the -- and the runoff prevention. That's water that does not end up going to our Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility. So, what that ends up being, you know, money saved. Another thing I would like to point out is that we are able to determine, obviously, what our canopy consists of as far as genus and species. Currently our most common trees by genus are our Acer, which are the maples, and Pinus, which actually that just recently got bumped up, since adding the golf course. The golf course actually really bumped up our Pinus numbers and Gledicia, which are Honey Locust and Fraxinus are the top four species and Fraxinus is a little bit alarming for me,just because we do have the impending threat of the Emerald Ash Borer that will eventually show up here, so-- moving right along. While I was developing this plan and coming up with it, I kept returning to like five common themes, areas that kept kind of popping up and everything kind of fit into these categories. So, we decided to pull these aside and call them our guiding principles. So, these guiding principles help us come up with -- with our goals and how we are to manage our urban trees and these are the guiding principles that we came up with to protect. I won't go into this entirely, because I will be happy to provide you all with a copy of the Urban Forest Management Plan, so that you can go through it, but in -- as for time sake I'm just going to itemize them here for you. To expand, to manage, inform and partner. Those were the five main categories that kept coming up. So, you will see I was able to actually coordinate each of the goals that I came up with and fit them into one of these categories. Speaking of the goals and objectives, we laid out the -- the -- the goals and objectives in a format that was consistent with the Meridian Parks Master Plan where we identified actions and looked at how the -- the capital cost estimate was going to be affected and the operational budget impact it was going to have and, then, came up with a time frame to complete those goals. I'm happy to say that the Meridian Urban Forest Management Plan identifies many areas of opportunity where we can continue to grow the forestry program in positive ways without having a substantial impact on the current budget. Under protect, which was to protect and preserve the existing canopy in Meridian, I would like to develop a more robust and diverse system for mitigation of tree canopy loss during development, because those mature trees that -- that make up the city canopy at large are important to managing other aspects, such as the ambient heat island effect and Page 15 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. September 28,2021 Page 13 of — whatnot, so -- so, I would like to do that by encouraging and incentivizing the retention, protection and incorporation of existing mature canopies into the development among the Meridian urban forest and I would like to explore, develop alternative options for tree mitigation where retention is not feasible. In expand, we would like to continue to create appropriate spaces for trees to grow and increase the canopy in Meridian's urban forest. We will do this by building new parks for one. We have Discovery Park phase two coming right up around the -- around the corner and on down the road we have West Meridian Regional Park is in the plans and Margaret Aldape Park and, then, I would also like to continue to work with planners and select tree species that are well suited for their location and work with designers to incorporate more tree friendly spaces and work with contractors to ensure that planting is done correctly, so that the trees can reach their full potential. In expand, we would like to continue to create appropriate spaces for trees to grow and increase the canopy of Meridian's urban forest. One of our ways to do that is working with the Arboretum where I would like to continue to make improvements to the Kleiner Arboretum by -- an example of that would be modifying some of the irrigation to address the specific watering needs of the trees. I would like to -- which would include, you know, potentially eliminating some of the turf areas within the Arboretum and expanding the bed space to accommodate the tree needs and -- and come up with some companion planting opportunities. And add --add additional features, such as naturalized shrub and perennial beds and large rocks and/or boulders. Another area where we can expand is through the Lakeview Golf Course, which we just recently took over and that would consist of conducting an inventory of all the trees on the golf course property and, then, building a management maintenance plan to address the plant healthcare concerns there and work with the golf course personnel to help guide them in the proper care for all the trees on the grounds. I'm happy to say that this goal has actually already been completed for the most part. To continue to create appropriate spaces for trees to grow and increase the canopy, we would also like to explore a system where existing trees in our parks can be potentially adopted and/or new trees can be accepted and planted as a memorial by members of public and I would like to create a mapping system for that. Now, I realize that some care would have to be taken in that process to make sure that -- that our parks don't end up looking like graveyards with tombstones and I already have some really great ideas on how to do that and it would end up being more of an educational aspect for the community at large, instead of -- for instance, the idea that's been bouncing around in my head is -- you are familiar with the signs on the trees in the Arboretum. Something akin to that, only it would be an educational blurb about the tree that they are looking at and, then, there could be a little note saying that this -- this sign was funded by -- you know, in memory of such and such person. Okay? And, then, limiting the amount of those that we would actually put in the park, so that we don't end up having a sign on every tree in the park. It would be limited to the -- you know, the singular species that might be in the park. So, just an idea. I think this is worth kind of kicking around some more. I think there is something good there that -- that we can come up with. And so in -- under managing, like to continue to find innovative and efficient ways to manage what we already have existing in our urban forest. The inventory software is one of the items that came up. We currently are using a version that is -- that we are allowed to use through the Idaho Department of Lands. It's very limited in what kind of powers I have, so -- as far as getting it to -- to do things for me that help me manage our Page 16 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. September 28,2021 Page 14 of — forest. It's -- it's good informationally, but it's not extremely useful for me. So, in order for -- for it to be as -- as good of a tool to us as -- as I would like it to be, we need to procure our own license for that. So, we would also manage the tree planting, develop an organized systematic plan for continued planting of trees throughout all our properties. We would review and revise the verbiage within the city ordinance text as necessary to create consistency and come up with a pruning cycle, which is -- which would be an annual process whereby all the city managed trees are pruned on a regular schedule, prioritizing trees that need the most immediate care, and, then, of course, we would support Public Works tree waste recycling program and I'm happy to say -- to report to you, actually, that the first item, the inventory software, has already been approved for the fiscal year'22 budget. So, we got a head start there, too. Thank you for that. We continue to find innovative and efficient ways to manage the existing urban forest by looking at the downtown trees. We would explore potentially taking on the maintenance of the street trees on both sides of Main Street from Franklin to Fairview Avenue. I feel like those trees are a big -- are like the face of downtown Meridian and anybody who is visiting the city or passing through drives by those trees and if anything were to happen to them I feel like it would be a smudge mark on the face of Meridian and I would really like to prevent anything like that from happening. So, I would like to also create more tree friendly growing spaces to accommodate the need for lasting mature canopy in downtown Meridian. And, lastly, I -- actually, not lastly -- under informed -- Simison: On that item, are those on private property or public property, the ones you are referring to in that corridor? Perkins: Those are on right of way property, not -- not -- not private property. Not private property trees. They are public right of way property trees. Simison: Okay. Thank you. Perkins: Those are the only ones that I'm concerned with. I do not have any -- any wish to -- to meddle with private property trees. Simison: Okay. Thank you. Perkins: To inform we would work to promote and foster community development by providing education opportunities to the public and our employees through the Arboretum and through community education classes, brochures and downloads, workshops, volunteer programs and enhancing our website. And, lastly, but not least, we -- I couldn't do all of the stuff that we have been talking about without partners and so I would like to continue to build and foster those healthy partnerships with ACHD, Idaho Power, Treasure Valley Canopy Network, other cities, downtown development, the United States Department of Agriculture and the Idaho State Department of Agriculture and Arbor Day Foundation and nonprofit organizations, such as CWI, Idaho Botanical Gardens, Idaho Fish and Game, et cetera. And can't forget about the local contractors and all the other local businesses. So, as the City of Meridian continues to grow and becomes the premier place to live, work and raise a family, the Meridian Urban Forest Management Plan will Page 17 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. September 28,2021 Page 15 of — help guide the city arborist to build a robust forestry program that suits the needs of our community. With that I will stand for question. Thank you. Simison: Thank you, Matthew. I'm going to turn this over Councilman Bernt to take this call. Bernt: Sure. Matthew, thanks -- thank you for your presentation this evening. Questions from Council? Perreault: Council President? Bernt: Ms. Perreault. Perreault: Thank you very much. This is fantastic information. Just a couple questions. When you mentioned the -- the software and all the things you would like to do to manage the inventory of trees, what do we currently do for pruning cycles? Is it just handled by the individual parks directors to prune their locations on their own or is there a pruning cycle that already exists and you are just wanting to automate it through a software system? Perkins: Yes. Perreault: Okay. Perkins: Yes. We actually already have a pruning cycle developed and it's continually morphing and evolving with all of the new sites and stuff that we have been taking on. So, having that inventory program will be extremely beneficial in managing all of those trees. Perreault: Is the hope, then, to get it -- to get the information organized enough and systemized enough to then, add, like tree planting and improvements to the CFP in a -- you know, on five year or ten year. You had -- you had mentioned kind of how long do we want this management plan to last and so is that -- is that a goal is to actually have -- to have a plan set up such that it would be, then, added to -- an expected amount added to the budget every year? Are we -- are we kind of getting that far? Perkins: We are -- yeah. We are getting -- we are getting a little -- little far. Perreault: Okay. The director just came over, so maybe he wants to -- Siddoway: Maybe I can help with that answer. It wouldn't be the intent to put it in the CFP, because it's not capital projects. They are ongoing maintenance and operations projects and we handle them as detailed fixed costs. So, the idea would be to just -- if you just substitute the CFP part of that question to having -- having a plan lined out for multiple years that would become our detail in the detailed cost portion of the budget, that would be the intent. Page 18 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. September 28,2021 Page 16 of 19 Strader: Council President Bernt? Bernt: Ms. Strader. Strader: I have a couple of things. But, first of all, the report was excellent and I'm just blown away. You're a one man band. What you are accomplishing it's incredible. Perkins: Thank you. Strader: We have seven percent canopy cover based on the report. I guess my first question is how are we doing? How is that? You know, is there a benchmark? What's our, you know, guiding -- because I read the goals and the goals are great there. There are a lot of goals -- and I'm rambling a little bit, but it was a lot about having a great program that can be maintained going forward, but what I didn't see is I didn't see like an ambitious goal, like, you know, we want to map the city to find all the heat islands where there are no trees and we want to increase the canopy by X amount in those areas or we think that we should be achieving a ten percent canopy cover in the next decade and do you need like some consulting resources to drive goals like that? Do you need to hear from Council if we are interested in goals like that? I just was surprised I didn't see anything like that. Perkins: All of the above and that's -- yeah, that's still kind of in the exploratory phases here of flushing this out and figuring out exactly what we -- what we want those goals to be for sure. Ideally, yes, I would love to be able to come up with a plan like that where we are shooting for an -- an ambitious goal like ten percent canopy cover. Cavener: Council President Bernt? Bernt: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Matthew? Matt? What do you prefer? Perkins: Either or. Go with Matt. Cavener: I'm Lucas when my mom gets mad at me and Luke when -- so, we will stay informal. One, Matt, I enjoyed getting to meet you on the parks tour and your enthusiasm for your trade I mean just comes across when you are presenting yourself and -- and like my colleagues, I really -- I did not think on paper I would enjoy like a tree plan when you look at that and it was really insightful when you look at where we are headed as a city and, initially, I had some questions -- kind of to Council Member Perreault's comments about the pruning cycle, because I just naively thought that somebody else was handling that. But that's something you are kind of handling and so as I go through this plan it's -- it's a lot and when we have people who are amazing and care about our city and are really great at what they do, I actually worry are we over -- are we self imposing ourselves to be overwhelmed at a later point in time and so I'm hoping that you could maybe talk a little bit about achieving this plan with you as kind of the lead for that and being the kind Page 19 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. September 28,2021 Page 11 of 19 of the sole staff resource and how achievable is it given your time and the premium that your job commands? Perkins: Yes, I do feel like it would be achievable. I will definitely need to come up with some creative ways to do that. I think in the -- in the plan one of the things I mentioned was coming up with a -- a volunteer program aimed to like the tree stewards, that would be a great, great program for me to start up. Kind of one of the first things that I wanted to jump on, because that would be a tremendous help. Most of the trees within our parks are fairly-- are on the younger side and that is the most important time to get the structural pruning done that would -- that would actually have the most longevity as far as making our canopy last for a long time and be healthy and -- and not have the problems that a neglected canopy would have. So, I think I'm going to have to end up relying on some -- some volunteers and additional other parks personnel coming -- stepping in and helping me when I -- when I come up with projects like that, so -- but I do -- I do feel like it is achievable, yes. Siddoway: Mr. President? Councilman Cavener, I appreciate the sensitivity to the overworked issue. It's very real in our department. We are a lot of one person bands, Renee earlier tonight. Matt. Great example. One of the--one of the-- I came up because one of the pieces I'm probably better suited to speak to is we do have a forestry assistant in the CFP coming up in FY-23, so I wanted to make you aware of that. It's been in there already for three or four years and we had it planned as the --for our future as Discovery Park came on, more trees, more -- multiple sites. The tree canopies -- or the tree -- the urban forest is getting older and as it ages and gets bigger the pruning needs increase. The management demands increase overall. So, we do have a need for an additional staff and I appreciate the opportunity for me to just, you know, bring that up. But we do have it planned for. We have had it planned for a number of years. It's not coming up this year, but it will come up next year. Cavener: Great. Perkins: Thank you, Steve. I wasn't sure if I could speak to that or not. Appreciate it. Strader: Council President Bernt? Bernt: Ms. Strader. Strader: Yeah. You know, one thing, too, I think to think about and -- and maybe it's just to hear from Council if this is a priority for them as well, but I would love for you to try to identify -- maybe come back with a -- kind of a goal on of where we want to go in terms of increasing our tree canopy and especially finding the areas of the city where there is a high need. That urban heat island effect is a serious issue for people in the summer and I think it's something that we should focus on and I love the focus on the outreach and education, because I don'tjust view it that, you know, our only goal is trees on city property period. I personally view it that your department could have a real community impact and could partner with HOAs, especially in underserved areas, or other organizations to try to Page 20 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. September 28,2021 Page 18 of — increase the tree canopy and so, you know, I think it's really important and I appreciate the plan so far. I -- I just would challenge you guys a little bit and just to give some support, I strongly support putting some more resources into this, you know, within reason if it helps us develop some ambitious goals that kind of take us into the future in the next several decades. Perkins: Excellent. I'm happy to hear that. Thank you. Hoaglun: Mr. President? Bernt: Mr. Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Question, Matthew. On -- on your Urban Forest Management Plan draft on page 41 there was the current Meridian pruning cycle and it gives the years and locations, but I'm assuming those are all the locations eventually, 20 through, you know, in future sites, that you are responsible for that, those are city properties -- right of way properties that we have to maintain. Perkins: Yes. Hoaglun: Okay. So, those are the areas that -- you know, to Council Woman -- Council Woman Strader's point, that, you know, where we can increase canopy and additional trees and look at heat islands and, definitely, you know, if we get Discovery Park, you know, phase two, there is going to be a lot of trees out there. So, you know, if you are going to meet -- oh, there you go, you have met ten percent in the one year, so -- but mean those -- those are good comments to -- to see where are those areas that we can improve or there is older trees, because some of our downtown parks are -- are older and some of the trees aren't in great shape, just because of insects and other things, disease, so -- Perkins: Just the growing space, you know, the downtown core itself would -- would benefit greatly from making some amendments to some of it. Hoaglun: Exactly. So, yeah, you do have your work cut out for you and I appreciate Steve talking about the budget and additional help and need to see what we -- we need to do in that area in the future. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Thank you. I wholeheartedly agree with Council Woman Strader. I am excited about this and I love the idea that we will not only have a management plan, but also hope that we do have a vision for it and look forward to what you bring back to us on that. There is a little saying in my industry that says you can't manage what you don't measure. So, I believe that the inventory piece of this, the software piece of it is really critical and I'm Page 21 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. September 28,2021 Page 19 of — looking forward to seeing how we can improve the efficiency, how we can manage better financially when we have all of the information in place that allows us to make those decisions. So, thank you for all your hard work on this. I'm really excited about it and we -- we have had the public come before us a time or two since I have been here and -- and have said things like, you know, we don't want to have huge parking lots, we don't want to have asphalt, we don't want to have a cement city and I think that these are the kinds of things that help us -- I don't want to say combat, but help us kind of manage not having that feel in our city -- is to continue to have, you know, beautification and landscaping in the areas that we can. So, thank you very much. Perkins: Thank you very much. Very happy to hear that I have so much support out there. Simison: Council, any additional questions or comments or follow up? Appreciate it, Matthew. Perkins: Thank you, sir. Thank you. Simison: Council, we have reached the end of our agenda. Do I have a motion? Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I move that we adjourn the meeting. Simison: I have a motion to adjourn the meeting. All those in favor -- Hoaglun: Second. Oh, that's right. Never mind. Simison: Yes. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5.36 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 10 / 12 / 2021 MAYOR ROBERT E SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK Page 22 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the September 14, 2021 City Council Work Session Page 3 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. September 14,2021 Page 24—24 Simison: Council, do I have a motion? Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I move that we come out of Executive Session. Cavener: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to come out of Executive Session. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it and we are out of Executive Session. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Simison: Do I have a motion to adjourn? Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I move that we adjourn the meeting. Cavener: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to adjourn the meeting. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6.04 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 9 / 28 / 2021 MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK Page 27 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the September 14, 2021 City Council Regular Meeting Page 28 Meridian City Council Item#2. September 14,2021 Page——59 Bernt: I move that we adjourn the meeting. Strader: Second. Perreault: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to adjourn the meeting. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:30 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) g / 28 2021 MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK Page 87 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the September 21, 2021 City Council Work Session Meridian City Council Work Session Item#3. September 21,2021 Page " of " Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I move that we adjourn the meeting. Hoaglun: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second -- I have a motion to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:47 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK Page 105 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the September 21, 2021 City Council Regular Meeting Page 106 Meridian City Council Item#4. September 21,2021 Page 7 of, Bernt: I move that we adjourn the meeting. Hoaglun: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion to adjourn. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it and we are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:12 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) g / 28 / 2021 MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK Page 113 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Plat for Artemisia Subdivision (FP-2021-0046) by Engineering Solutions, Located at the Northwest Corner of W. Overland Rd. and S. Linder Rd. E IDIAN:--- IDAHO C� MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Staff Contact:Sonya Allen Meeting Date: September 28, 2021 Topic: Final Plat for Artemisia Subdivision (FP-2021-0046) by Engineering Solutions, Located at the Northwest Corner of W. Overland Rd. and S. Linder Rd. Request: Final plat consisting of seven (7) buildable lots on 19.26 acres of land in the C-G zoning district. Information Resources: Click Here for Application Materials STAFF REPORT C� W IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A H O DATE: 9/28/2021 Legend N-R R1 TO: City Council iLccfl-fio" -RT=: L p- FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner - - R- RU T=R-8 RUfi 208-884-5533 R-R RUT SUBJECT: FP-2021-0046 Artemisia Subdivision Iyl-, RUT I-L 20 PROPERTY LOCATION: Northwest corner of W. Overland Rd. & R-8. _ U - S. Linder Rd. in the SE 1/4 of Section 14, C,C T.3N.,R.1W. -- ,R- R-8 R- R- R- ___ _R- __R, RUT Rl RU I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Request for final plat consisting of seven(7)building lots on 19.26 acres of land in the C-G zoning district for Artemisia Subdivision. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant Engineering Solutions— 1029 N. Rosario St., Ste. 100,Meridian,ID 83642 B. Owner: Idaho Auto Mall,LLC—8854 W. Emerald St., Boise,ID 83704-4830 C. Representative: Becky McKay,Engineering Solutions— 1029 N. Rosario St., Ste. 100,Meridian,ID 83642 III. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the preliminary plat(H- 2021-0014) as required by UDC 11-6B-3C.2. The proposed final plat depicts two(2)fewer building lots than shown on the approved preliminary plat. Therefore, Staff finds the proposed final plat is in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary as required. Page 1 IV. DECISION A. Staff- Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section VII of this report. V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat (dated: 1/27/2021) PRELIMINARY PLAY e� ARTEMISIA SUBDIVISION nw wuxrr,IOAxo 2027o PROJECT S__ITE�� c €ie -------------------------------------------------------------------------` � a - - -,- E ------------ Z. HE - w .—. -- - 51 o-� � •9 � any- go-.-„�.�'� �� I /— �: Page 2 B. Final Plat(dated: 8/4/21) AR I!ll: /1113ItA SUBDIVISION BOCK_,PAGE A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE SE 'k OF THE SE 'A OF SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO _ 2021 _ scx[Fa_xm xxxxB.axx.xx„rrAUC ,R-L- RREOJw ME Rw,rxs,�n",Iw mrs�rxxw,s„ Ir1If16T v f N TEmI,N a[I 4Y+CpT ro sxY xLxnC sm[FT-lNR FwSEIVn SH4L xw w[0.L0[ME FwrsmnCPw Cf IV40-91RdK5➢0xIKx'xY5 s Irsm.la ii no�xarW`7.:+?s��mg ux`arsvw _p x„c Klsl�i¢xi":vemrxrmurr`I'..mr��[u1G ui�nnm�re"�m�lixin�w�nr �59996I"E 4Fv]IY- no xn nBaSiS,lr Nx-xY ,•� 1 - aic,e�[-.R x[munors ix -Im[,xw n m[xml®nmm. - -f-- I~�I I i MMIx 1H[9BdM5Mx.I1 A[EnnllID rO NAIGIIOx Iw.rtA di5�x10 wLL AEatt11GIE0�MAwt£59�[iur5 FMv 11E xxPn.x[Ndyix lGtfM dS@ICr� 11 xxssusxr,x¢xoa,s I rrerrxs xro xxr uswarx Tl tie [isANrr xNa xa 1 g I a¶xs R-E OR mx rcE NT ro U I Dorn c wr Is,HE AEsvmselurc rc n w axrm I[ss s,w RE—UT,Is asv Ee A I�Lx. I� Ir xNPlwrim I Film azsxna lsxnrc.w x x. w u r �III wsww,.s�xmc lr Y Y MA Cl HI[HWAY CISIAICT I,I I .wo,uxmmm xB1e Wrcwnww111., .m 11 wATxx n"w�.ew m[Bw alo nxw xwlalrv+.�w.cmm w[Ii�rEAnxww lx[x vxiwn ixRrsinsrttn�"R[xArs fmx Tn[ixv m.1[`w`Htix��I I.—[s 11111 I 1 I � rc»wxw i We.Ecr ra w[1[exs a.rcrc[axExr uR[n I I �aK, I En wm�cm a xExlolex x[c[rmm as Iwlwxwr xo.AmI-Imxn.xEmxm m .sa,o.d sru•E I G.°A00 Aswcl Pww.Wr ME AEA xmuroxmcn`�rs xx wuTMxcrNsµn�rzrmis�Lmrsn I.E.ev,RuI Rasr aruuu uurw area-nIu 1. xnw ox"xuz sx,xn m,sM11 I daloma.[Ixcwosorw.ceum,"uo nmRsw.TmHns[wxlxs RtHn[ luux alxio-E [nswwlm 11 I H 1 f la saw wl[R[nuxa�srn[x+aE omuno m m[ nAxwr's Fw 1HE OPwsICx IB x—TTO[[F O ME H Slab IS OF I Q1[Rdxrf£6,31[U—T um.'eE xmNlpl 1—w INMIExT W ffCl�s or 1_ Ic rxxxrc.alx.,lw ExNxwl �, I o'u�y xssmlrnws rxw xx,sxmx sv®Irew roxw�Isx wo xenrwww a 31 i i x,xNn"'�wx a v i "•I "r 1111 mEs.Iex mws _.ex,oll:u s,mNsw. 1 U-Na -ar wIAl. Jil 1 E al w.n,.Ila Lp , _�I •TME wlwax —� S. ssaxsxw aT cwExs esma"nw. Ncer x as wNEn m r uwu.a eumx usalEn u NIwN x r"wx oF.xu m eE xNxTum III Nc xnnrryl 'I I _ V �Wg ThRq ST. W I s - nq`- I RI I �•1$ gg CURVE TABLE Iq __ y �+ gll I W z ELRVE 8 [EHGN RAI)i 5 DELTA III:AkbG CHORD st xxx I s�i g� so.arc a I I III 92 on ss:a3s' s, 3s-w swa nwxsw aua.w,' xmdr�j I xS lWwnwEx � gl� [ �nTElt - k�I � A 11y�� aarp s�G s' x'n,'a't xim• w w wT C o v--- Blu _____ 'J 1 aaar ax',a nxw z, msxsxr x[Awn uIa 3 2 nl AaoN r1ZCSx' s .se"w an.m' Blru[fETY' s I.- I!I a a eg ,xn a ,ry NI Saar s�cae• x 7x'ae•c , --._.._.._.._.._ g[Iwrrsxare Tma- fl " ` I` _-----_-_N MN7 xlWwxYBNWIGr[w£ T sx „I _______ aEA.Rxon RbE ws RnTm xol �'BmEwmd nw $$Be a A ® ar eR'wNANVR./ILItxC w LINE TAME LINEx [wcTn olREcnav o LN xu.NEx�w.e,s nl,e mxs xorto xo'N794_ N94'194151 el]L BEGINNINGS R—I„ o'xtb =—_� �•N az95�x mw _ BI LYs�i m - W.tlhRWO R0. �T+� xlmNmR LIi 9i„ e"A 6l9' SN 941E µ rA aun xrcwu2 _ L7 .W 11—'E w ��/ _ ''�n�a xsnsuurs i NrGff W.NTA a a � Lta lair sxrto'Bxw SURVEY N/ldtATIVE -'->,--�•$s IRE ACCEelm Ta ESTABusH THE BwxxRR.FOR THE—MNIIw s'Hawr+HESEox. s=K 1 EAS0.[. DETAIL A AD ft 10 n SOMONSN, ;r,^��.^�_on°a^^•nmx SHEET 1 OF 5 Page 3 C. Landscape Plan(dated: 3/2/21) LANDSCAPE NOTES. , GENERAL NOTES: z E yy r 7 E S RE ON-E ARE R E LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS A,�o = 1 � y5qq L E�3 r c b —----—--—--—- A TWO i ARE 6R m m - �/-10VER4LL LANDSCAPE PLAN Page 4 PLANT SCHEDULE Tyr---'r•e- -- — - ............ m� v� aa0' I all ce IF BUILDING BUILDING p b I q ea 1 0:.: NATGHLINE-SEf SHEEP L110 f\l� I XF�L1 10 PLANTSCHEDULE � MATCHLINE SEEHEETL110 — gill I - —_— -W.TASASTREET— j via I 0 Lr r .. r I 1 :�: q m w I m h° a s --------------- W ovEReao——— ——— Page 5 PLAWSCHEDULE Q RUT U H ll Ad il 7,T-7 =-L ------------ A M 0 d g 'T S .ITA PLANTSCHEDULE TEN T E H I EZ.Lj 10 TEN ....... ....... —H S EE SHEET ITI T 10 TEN # LEmj�F, LLE ----------------------------- E�Lr�\/ATICII PLAN VIEN V M co (—)LANDSCAPE PLAN:AREA FOUR Page 6 VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development(H-2021-0014,Development Agreement Inst. #2021-1094171. 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the subject final plat within two years of the City Council's approval of the preliminary plat(by June 15,2023),or apply for a time extension, in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by Land Solutions, stamped on 8/4/21 by Clinton W. Hansen, included in Exhibit B shall be revised as follows: a. Note#12: Include the recorded instrument number of the ACHD License Agreement. b. Include a note granting cross-access/ingress-egress easements between all lots in the subdivision in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A.2. c. Graphically depict a minimum 25-foot wide permanent dedicated buffer along S. Linder Rd. and a minimum 10-foot wide buffer along S. Spanish Sun Way and W. Tasa St. for landscaping as set forth in UDC 11-313-7C.2b. This easement is described in Note#17 but doesn't appear to be graphically depicted. d. Include the recorded instrument number of the existing pedestrian pathway easement graphically depicted on the plat. e. Include the recorded instrument number of the existing City of Meridian sanitary sewer and water easement graphically depicted on the plat. 5. The landscape plan prepared by South Beck and Baird, dated 3/2/21 included in Exhibit C, shall be revised as follows: a. Depict minimum 6-foot wide parkways/planting strips and detached minimum 5-foot wide sidewalks along all streets within the development per the Development Agreement. The minimum width of parkways planted with Class II trees is 8-feet; the minimum with ofparkway planters for Class I and III trees is 10 feet. Planter widths for Class II trees may be reduced to 6-feet if root barriers are installed per the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17E. b. Sidewalks/pathways shall include dedicated crosswalks at the intersection with all streets within commercial activity centers and shall be distinguished from surrounding paving per the Development Agreement. c. Change the fencing material around the Kendall Ford site to a higher quality than chain- link(i.e. wrought iron),per the Development Agreement. d. Include one(1) additional tree in the southern perimeter street buffer along W. Overland Rd. to comply with UDC 11-313-7C.3b. e. In the Landscape Calculations table, include calculations that demonstrate compliance with the standards for pathway(11-3B-12C)and parkway(11-3B-7C)landscaping; include required vs. provided number of trees. Page 7 An electronic copy of a revised landscape plan shall be submitted with the final plat application for City Engineer signature. 6. The final plat shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits for any structures beyond those on the Kendall Ford site(i.e.Lot 1,Block 1). The Kendall Ford site is allowed to develop and obtain buildingpermits prior to recordation of the plat,subject to approval by the Building Department. 7. A 14-foot wide public use easement for the multi-use pathway along S. Linder Rd. shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to submittal for City Engineer signature on the final plat(s). If the pathway will be located entirely within the right-of-way, a public pedestrian easement is not needed. 8. All waterways on this site shall be piped as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6B unless otherwise waived by City Council. 9. Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions 1. A deposit must be provided for an 8" sewer main extension along the north part of the property to be constructed at a later date. Applicant will be required to pay 125% of the bid amount to complete this work prior to the final plat being signed. 2. Applicant must provide a 20-foot-wide utility easement free of encroachments (including but not limited to trees,shrubs,fences,buildings,and infiltration trenches)that will cover the future extension of an 8" sewer main along the north part of the property, including a point of access for future maintenance. Easement to be dedicated prior to construction plans being approved. 3. Ensure no sewer services pass through future infiltration trench locations. General Conditions: 4. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department,and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 5. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 6. All improvements related to public life,safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 7. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff,the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 8. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete Page 8 fencing, landscaping, amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 9. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 10. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City.The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 11. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life,non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 12. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 13. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 14. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 15. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 16. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 17. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 18. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 19. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 20. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 21. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be Page 9 installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 22. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2" x I I" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 23. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 24. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development, and if so, how they will continue to be used, or provide record of their abandonment. 25. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 26. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 9-1-28.C.1).The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available,a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 27. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Page 10 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Plat for TM Frontline (FP-2021-0047) by Brighton Development, Inc., Generally Located on the South Side of W. Franklin Rd., Approximately% Mile West of S. Linder Rd. E IDIAN:--- IDAHO C� MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Staff Contact:Sonya Allen Meeting Date: September 28, 2021 Topic: Final Plat for TM Frontline (FP-2021-0047) by Brighton Development, Inc., Generally Located on the South Side of W. Franklin Rd.,Approximately 1/4 Mile West of S. Linder Rd. Request: Final plat consisting of six (6) buildable lots on 1S.99 acres of land in the C-G zoning district. Information Resources: Click Here for Application Materials STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY N -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING 9/28/2021 legend � � m DATE: ' Project Lc=fki -r TO: Mayor&City Council �. FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner R1 208-884-5533 r �- R SUBJECT: FP-2021-0047 `H TM Frontline -•R R- R LOCATION: South side of W. Franklin Rd., R1 _ approximately 1/4 mile west of S. Linder R�8 R- Rd., in the NE 1/4 of Section 14,T.3N., RU R-,S R.1W. (Parcel#S1214121134) 1 { I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat consisting of six(6)buildable lots on 15.99 acres of land in the C-G zoning district for TM Frontline Subdivision. This is the third phase of development of TM Center Subdivision(H-2020-0074). TM Creek No. 5 (1" phase FP-2021-0027); TM Crossing No. 5 (2"d phase FP-2021-0045). II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Representative: Brighton Development,Inc.—2929 W.Navigator Dr., Ste. 400, Meridian,ID 83642 B. Owner: DWT Investments,LLC—2929 W.Navigator Dr., Ste. 400,Meridian,ID 83642 C. Contact/Representative: Josh Beach,Brighton Development,Inc.—2929 W. Navigator Dr., Ste. 400, Meridian,ID 83642 III. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat for TM Center Subdivision and associated conditions of approval as required by UDC 11-6B- 3C.2. There are seven(7)fewer buildable lots than shown on the approved preliminary plat. Therefore, Staff finds the proposed final plat is in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. Page 1 Item#6. IV. DECISION A. Staff- Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section VI of this report. V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(dated: May 1,2020) TM CENTER SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT A PARCL_DI LAND REI NG A POR I ON D I I HE HORS h wE5 r 1!4 AN U A PORTION OF THE W'=S-1/2 OF-HE NORTHEAST V4 OF SECTION 14,TOW\SHIP 3 NUR-H,RANGE I WEST, - L E LI ISL MERIDIAN,CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADA CD UN r Y,I DAHO,2020 1 I m o m v c a o a QP m j 0 O O 0' RRFII�RY RAi 0.4TA lE9EIG i D ® L W — s FUMB ID 0 0 *'iYTr TMCFh TFR5URDIl""Il eav�N� 8 MERIDIAN,IOAh PPS.D Page 2 Page 129 Item#6. B. Final Plat(date: 8/23/2021) PLAT OF TM Frontline Subdivision A VORTIDN OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF THE NORTHEAST lid OF SECTION 14, TO W HEMP 9 R—,RANEE 1 WEST,NOISE MERIDIAN, N OIFY OF MERIDIAN,ADA ODUNTv,IDAHO- 2ml ran cr Iarl�Pvr EO�xlte II.Y�9ECMx u FlanxlYl Rd. Pe¢-��i.otw.c R. Iur tee' tueExrasr xLwpn •, oe eENeHGB 0 a0 80 180 lad ...__ ___�� _• HBgr�'i21Y sd6].19'........................ ......... -- . 14 14 -- ga x Unplrthd SRR'1 S't 7"E pF].Dz' Iingat@d gYI - ___A cl _______ map•___________ ____________yte�ar.�--________ � L rpxr cr azareuc I ��ypix>• I � SNEET INDIX E � I I F g I SNER t -Pu'IYP An0 LEOEIL � (D� I SMELT Z -M�5 V—tY s¢RmE e R __ SNER S -CfleerGrE CE MwER'S '$ 1 SHELF 4 -OFARFlG,TES AND APPR.�f.LS Sw1S•UT ]]SSS' F LEGEND S �� I � JLUMfIux HP,!B HdaE➢ I Y I Io ve•—F IAwem pu 1NEB'IINIESS NOR➢DIEERAISE �p • 9��So'�Eew W�IfX PL SIIC GP pp 9 m Twelv6die OaEe SET REp'+ PIASTIc twa - b pEp y,l Villa 5� vison wMtED ED'Nsrt Id $� �2'� eDBefvi3E71 IIWNIYRf uEe zozaz• zEvae• i k mF�� seR•t51 YE yesbr' I `^ ____— =ION ONE NOCAB'AiE —--— Aavca•n lM LINE 3!-'A' 119e'r.1'I2Y Sp]55' io'YEI�e� �� FiE4MENC IWE B ••••••••• SrIRN.Y iIE UK 6 REFERENCES I µt1. eoN9oIE ewK toe I RI. M. �,�coNNrc I¢wn PAAES ter'!9-tw61. i I f Ri. 0.vE W!(E NLU 91BONEOk BOOK 1tp,R]�ES tµtt-t Mta. J P[[UPf6,Lf Yx COUNFx,ELxt0. ___-_-__ _ -- Y^` ` RE. ---st--se]q R[conos of Ara wExrx,Iovn RE91Bp'781T]]s.b'_ _ __-_ S�•y4'w ltW w, REWRp CF SBRT'Ik.9Eae RFFORCB 0T Ap1 CWRv,IOuq. -C�r�rs1Y 0 mum IMw xa med-tear F:,P[tdme yr Mn Ten Mlle flrAin ZG^FAbp J wavETNARRAnvE �? j0� r I NoRr�.Asr�,a wR.Lx, "'Z EL�`P �v.rvETAeu rrt��E ag r�rrxpa9�m4�m STMEF.ID�mE.cyxp�gi� E N GAR E E P r N G n tvsaac sea 'a.w .ear Rtats muss—D IN rNc mn Axv A nm rjj'23 �Im.� p I6I.•.wt searF re K�I°�'NA.se*unww: +�uc.PuuIbc.�� nRN +aT.t eaeveR' Nts.r.rt t R[vuno xeff Nm muxo r[�s�As 9IIOIm IEraai Page 3 Page 130 Item#6. PLAT OF TM Frontline Subdivision NCTE6 1, !lFIRr.4 EKDNG MT9+GK 111E5 SHALL CgNFORW M THE APPUCAELE 2DHhC REWLATKAS OF THE CITY OF MEIRIOLAW AI THE T.WE OF ISSUANCE OF A 8IJLOIIQ PEfWT. 2 AK-+AEA6-WSION OF THIS PLAT SWILL COMPLY 1WTH THE APP FABLE ZONNC.RERUTI"8F IIE GTT m vChKim W EFFECT AT THE 7MME dF TIC#*k1Mw C*L * TIE BQITOW OF STRUCTURAL FOOTNOS SHALL BE SET A Wtlr Ld Of i2-rb2mES AWY[ TK RIpHEISI T,$IABUSHEO MMFIAL ORXND TIwtm bZwk7ION 4. MS ftiNW.tDON IS SuLdtl 10 A E1fVCM9F91 HT A9%EHENT,RDg099E0 AS IMSTKNEIIT Na -_ CF AOA OWNW 1 $ Ih%k3A714N b.'IION 31-�B05 f11 d. OGTRCf W CDWPLIANC£WITH WHO Cri DEN.1 41 T 11M. .WWAWOEW TO ffl%LTIOH"Ttlt PoCHf4 AmD EM„4 M OELiCATED FOR uEmt r*W IMT ft-WRNr+ M&AM4 D*IRX67. IL THE Oa OPWNT RECCCNX&SE%M a-4SW OF " pmg WN, nrNT Tg FARM A,GT, IIIHiC4 STATES: 'MAT A (CULTURAL WERATIP4. AGRICULTURAL FACILITY OR M-ANSICIL THEREOF EH4.LL BE OR EEWNE A FAI PFGvATE OM PUBLIC ETY ANY CH WOM aM[HTM011S IN OR ARGUT THE RuRRGJROHRC RauORIpILTu4AL ACTIVI AR IT WAS I�.M r1{H1 DtATIOW NR 4M 1FV44 PIE 1 YEN[ *4EN TIE OPEIR+TT F'MrY OR E%PINEIOH NAS NOT A IILISA" AT THE TIME IT BEAN OR YIDS DI:'IED_THIS PRffN910.19 4F THIS 9ECTr7H SHALL NOT APPLY wHEW A NLISALItE Rf SOLT3 fRdl M w.10 1 OR PI"KREIrT gPIP#LTION IDr AMF A.GMCULTURJL QP4 TKK AGPMOJLTUR,ML FOULITY OR ETPA4STPI THEREOF'. 7, # S � YRCT 1 H T16 THATCOnAN THIS OERAMM OF O WENANTS,COMINTIOKS, AESTRiCTVWS AWpEA9ADTST N FM RCCIM AS NUYMM? m- OF AO&C004TY RECDRM+110 MAY 9E kwia b rpm TINE TO T E. R UMLESS SHO" OTHUMPE.ALL LOT LINES CTGLWM TO THE PUE JC RCHTS-01` MW.Y CDNTAN A 10.00 Ffff off E2oiNEW FUT PuBAC LRILTTES, CITY OF WEIbDLUL STREET LIGxTS, P"ATI NhE ATmpN ANp PPi4PEI r DRA WA. SHD "Oft m IRRIGATIOK MD PIMT)Om DIIAINWE EAEEMEIIIS ARE RESBNED N FWLR O THE OFEWIR, OR ASSDC� 4. uILESS OTM£NubE pm[m$iW , AIL L9T LINES GULMON" THE SUBOMSKN BMhEARY CONTAIN A 4D.D11 FOOT MADE EJSEWENT FOR PL13X UTLITIES.F7aDPfRTY IRRIGATION ANO PROPERTv ORINAGE.Sy0 P4DPERTY IRMAT10k Ax6 PFSPORTY DRmOjX EASELEWTS ARE RtSM4D N rAwW gr TWE gP9woR.gR ASWH5 10L LOTS SHAM 410T BE REDUCED W 92E WMCI.IT PAM APPROVAL FFOM THE HF&TH AUTHKAITv AND M prf M w1hom 11. HG AUIDH OVAL Oft&tTIt 71AEV SLPM $.SHALL K IWALLED BEYMD THE WATER SYSTT]! AFRTMW?MED IN SANITARY F43FMCTKN RELEASE 12. W/IW IENAHrE 9f ANY rnrATKM AMMO DRAINAGE F'FES OC DITCHES Qlbm U A tm 15 THE RE-- Y 9BLTIY 9F THE LCT OYRER UMMS 9ACH RE3FGISELLITV 5 A99UWED BY AN MQATH7MfMAftW Efi4TITv. U ESfPT AT APPFIVM ACCESS PDl4TLSk 01RECT TAT CN PARCEL ACCESS TO YL FRAN4LN ROAD 6 PROHIBITED. 14, IMF ALL LOTS 9-10*IMT MTHE WASOW TE SHALL M OE C#�F WhUbCAL JH CpiY 11 FIE9TWTIDH5 AW rAEENEHT3 LSE NOTE AuD 159MSS V AM"ON WE PUBLIC RIGHT-Cf-WYS ARO T4 TIE UTILITY E�EHTTE AAIt S pDIELIKATZ OR NO Ei D 4R THE FLIT. 15, THS VJ30;79ON IS SUE EYr TO A LIm4E AUIREIENENT W74 RAWPA R LEAIWH IRRIGATION DISTRICT PER IYSTRALENT NIX L LA ft ## yT,ER4 4 662 K = 2LM F N G I N IF R i N G 5-}%wITW DB]g4�L71L'AY mm GJ Dwm b.«rpmn II,Y HIP 2?]11 WIEET 2#+ Page 4 Page 131 Item#6. C. Landscape Plan(date: 8/23/2021) ... o t tl LANDSCAPF PLAN Zrt- STREET TREE CALCULATIONS(TTREE/35 LF)x m —r TOTALSTREETTREES MITIGATION REQU I REMENTS O = TOTAL TREES RMUIREDIPREMDEO ELI � N Ion LT.G Page 5 Page 132 Item#6. VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development(TM Center aka Ten Mile Crossing H-2020-0074,Development Agreement Inst.#2021-089157). 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the City Engineer's signature on the previous phase final plat(i.e. TM Crossing No. 5 FP- 2021-0027)in accord with UDC 11-613-7 in order for the preliminary plat to remain valid; or, a time extension may be requested. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat shown in Section V.B prepared by KM Engineering, stamped on 8/23/2021 by Kelly Kehrer, shall be revised as follows: a. Note#4: Include the recorded Development Agreement number(i.e. #2021-089157). b. Note#7: Include the recorded instrument number of the CC&R's. c. Modify Note#13 as follows: "Except at approved access point(s),direct lot or parcel access to W. Franklin Rd. and S. Benchmark Ave. is prohibited." d. Note#15: Include the recorded instrument number of the NMID license agreement. e. Graphically depict a permanent dedicated buffer or common lot for the street buffers along W. Franklin Rd. & S. New Market Ave./Benchmark(25' and 20' respectively, measured from back of curb) and include a note that they will be maintained by the property owner or business owners' association(as applicable). f. Include the recorded instrument number of the aluminum cap per CP&F graphically depicted on the face of the plat on Sheet 1. g. Include the right-of-way for S. Benchmark Ave. in the boundary of this phase. An electronic copy of the revised plat shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 5. The landscape plan shown in Section V.C,prepared by KM Engineering, dated 8/23/21, shall be revised as follows: a. Depict the street buffer along W. Franklin Rd. with landscaping in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-7C. b. Include shrubs within the street buffers along S. Benchmark Ave. and W. Franklin Rd. along with the trees and vegetative groundcover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.3a. An electronic copy of the revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 6. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer,the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster, Sue Prescott, at 887-1620 for more information. Page 6 Page 133 Item#6. 7. All future development shall comply with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the C-G zoning district and UDC 11-4-3-27B.1. 8. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions: 1. Sewer main in South Benchmark Ave from Franklin Rd needs to be increased to 12" diameter. 2. All manholes must be accessible 3. Manholes 18 feet or deeper require a 60-inch diameter manhole. 4. Ensure no sewer services pass through future infiltration trench locations. 5. Water main in South Benchmark Ave from Franklin Rd needs to be increased to 12" diameter. General Conditions: 6. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development.The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department,and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 7. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 8. All improvements related to public life,safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 9. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 10. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 11. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 12. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter Page 7 Page 134 Item#6. of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 13. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life,non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 14. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 15. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 16. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 17. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 18. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 19. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 20. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 21. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 22. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 23. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 24. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2" x I I" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO Page 8 Page 135 Item#6. NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 25. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 26. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development, and if so, how they will continue to be used, or provide record of their abandonment. 27. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 28. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 9-1-28.C.1).The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available,a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 29. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Page 9 Page 136 77 C� E IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Order for Chewie Subdivision (FP-2021-0036) by Kent Brown Planning, Located on the North Side of W. Franklin Rd., Midway Between N. Ten Mile Rd. and N. Linder Rd. BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 14, 2021 ORDER APPROVAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 28, 2021 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT ) CONSISTING OF 6 BUILDING ) CASE NO. FP-2021-0036 LOTS ON 43.87 ACRES OF LAND ) IN THE I-L ZONING DISTRICT ) ORDER OF CONDITIONAL FOR CHEWIE SUBDIVISION. ) APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT BY: Adler AB Owner XI, LLC ) APPLICANT ) This matter coming before the City Council on September 14, 2021 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-613-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat,the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of"PLAT SHOWING CHEWIE SUBDIVISION, LOCATED IN THE S %2 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 3N, RANGE I W, BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2021, HANDWRITTEN DATE: March 29, 2021,by Steven C. Wellington, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 5," is conditionally ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(CHEWIE SUBDIVISION—FILE#FP-2021-0036) Page 1 of 3 approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated September 14, 2021, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked"Exhibit A" and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Kent Brown, Applicant Representative, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked"Exhibit B" and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(CHEWIE SUBDIVISION—FILE#FP-2021-0036) Page 2 of 3 Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight(28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 28th day of September 2021. By: Robert E. Simison Mayor, 9-28-2021 City of Meridian Attest: Chris Johnson 9-28-2021 City Clerk Copy served upon the Applicant,Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 9-28-2021 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(CHEWIE SUBDIVISION—FILE#FP-2021-0036) Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT C: E IDIAN --- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 9/14/2021 Legend mf® 9 R' 4 DATE' Project Location RUT TO: Mayor&City Council L-O R=40 L R-BRUT C=C R- R-8 C-N R 15 FROM: Joseph Dodson,Associate Planner C-G 208-884-5533 R1 L_0 C-N RUT � L R1 I=L SUBJECT: FP-2021-0036 R-40 RUT TN=C C-G TN'R C-N � R-15 Chewie Subdivision ITN'R LOCATION: The site is located on the north side of W. TNC �R1 RA R Franklin Road; midway between N. Ten T C t RUT Rig R 4 € Mile Road and N. Linder Road,in the S 9d '/z of Section 11,Township 3N.,Range H-E RI E 1 W �Rtl)!UT M-E RUT - I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat consisting of six(6) industrial lots on 43.87 acres of land in the I-L zoning district. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Owner: Adler AB Owner XI,LLC—865 W. Emerald, Suite 200,Boise,ID 83704 B. Representative: Kent Brown,Kent Brown Planning—3161 Springwood Drive,Boise,ID 83712 III. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the preliminary plat as required by UDC 11-6B-3C.2. The submitted plat includes the same number of buildable lots as approved with the preliminary plat. Staff finds the proposed final plat is in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. IV. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section VI of this report. Pagel V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(date: 11/13/2020) 3 gFI---- -— ap Iq. S O'35'23`W 3)6.29' I I mil I N O'3239'f 35e 1 '� I YID I IM (mA cz 0322t w n5,]I' C cn O Z �288 - £a �� 3 � A � N£ film �L z f`1i a 8=i Y Page 2 B. Final Plat(date: 3/29/2021) Q �, N.ffN XLE ROAO uN a9arreo O �§ Y�$sy,. ___35dV T pp 5s ________N O'00'20'E 1498.29' 109]86� Irlil —__—__ _____________ ________—_ i i�lfl O !I f I _---------� t 599e99 w 3,9� I � i 939 r�l m l s a�c•ar w 3 �S — F � 141Ty i 1=q0 i z 1------ -- ---J A o3V'23'W s7&29' I i o' m Z A fn _ Z I moo L0251 U H O'SY39'E I! I ' O y Z 1 i 1 O N O I N 932'38'E 356.14' _ 5 032'3Y W 7s7.82' A J j I N HA p^9 z E s asz'2 w 175.71' unPLarrEo w n+ w.L85S'h"R ROAD S C = o Iom � D —s • • ooB G � 4 ° , z g �asc)vz Page 3 N 0'32'38"t 356A `1 N YiT]9'E - N BEN"ANK AYFAflA t— i�ze az' I m JJ_ b 4N p'IT'$20 `g., Y, znoN `� > 00 ots i= �� an a im p. I W. "•m �� me E F,2 1 g QAm g A��q2� RX � I``>Io - I y� ma�� I I I I _ � p�a mg m goys>s 5 $em I a� A I I �m 3 Ada S D32.21-W 7-M71' I I I I II I � ` L------------------ m Ln �Ic C o_ 5 O z ,— ---------------------------- I I MUM c 1■ I � H� g S "spa �275331 I 'sE us: N4 I I - N m - z C) p��zzo c>oz Page 4 m � , - �e i--_---------- ais-a--------------- 71, �e on r ov I . l . I I II °> m1 ode off$ cc � s � m m � II 6s• II I I II � II � IIN �� I III s � s II i >� •" � Ili I III ® 000 i �I� I III � � • � � Ii,9. it l �I A s I � II I 496G• v I I II II I � s on6.3�•W 6�6� � I I� I I I I I I I I I —li li Nycj 9t�y � < it G.-I r � I S 0352r W 376.29' II 1 `--__ __ ______________ __ ____.__________.................. lid y o m-oA m �. r� -labuz Page 5 C. Landscape Plans(date: 12/2/2020) g s z 9R 40�Mloop � D aLC � zp a I , HOMES i Rxxa �� ?�w�^ Mks �s :fige� �a, #a ��?� � } 1,9r€s eti�ti� T gw g�F d^I m n a OWN ng R?i r ew fi c �e'Not .o t at &a lei will vkQ�5 ss l s °a �94 p e r78 � 5€ AME m Z ."I o cc WE R �� 9sum a �kT �s s qb?,o O m 1 g c?q �'#i a I z 1 �Z4��%F 90 'u4�bf MAY §d{O n I , I 1 is I g CHEWIE SUBDIVISION r FRANKLIN ROAD . �• ` i MERIDIAN, IDAHO OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAT UBMITTAL ....... ...... �..,...,.,. ...,.. ..,,.., Page 6 Item#7. n _,® L� WEST FXED 9MITi STREET -- - -- — No KEY MAP i PLANT SCHEDULE Lf •w w Jo z e O 7 w opoQ x - p Q mzzQ U W Z�W LL = U LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE LEGEND U O REQUIREMENTS i Z a a � a _ FI FI IJN ROAD _. - /)LANDSCAPE PLAN-AREA QNE e WEST TEil SMITH STR- LAUD VIL I — L C iA KEY MAP PLANT SCHEDULE ,.. 0z o o¢oz o mzz< O W Z p w LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE LEGEND U ° - REQUIREMENTS ! 33p r eu any CALLOU7 LEGEND FRMIKLIN ROAD - /TILANDSCAPE PLAN-AREA TWO L1.2 e Page 7 Page 147 WEST FRED SMITH STREET LANT SCHEDULE Al T�y 0 o >0< z _U,Ew L) MDSCAPE I ANDSCAPE LEGENID .1 REQUIREMENT$ z id T�U:I CALLOU7 LFG7ND 4�D &�="At, 0 HPIANKLIN MAP LIS WEST FRED aMrrH STREET N: KEY MAP PLANT SCHEDULE �p 0 ............. 0, �o < 4i) LjZQ, L) LA106I LANDSCAPE LEGEN11 z REQUIREMENTS FI—KILIN WITER —RIAL ! 0 i CALLOUT LEGEND X �OAPL PLAN�1,11LA IOUR _1.4 Page 8 Item#7. VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development: H-2020-0120 (PP);A-2020-0194 (CZC/DES);A-2020-0188 (PBA). 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat by March 23, 2023, within two(2)years of the date of approval of the preliminary plat(March 23,2021), in accord with UDC 11-6B-7, in order for the preliminary plat to remain valid or a time extension may be requested. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat shown in Section V.B,prepared by Land Solutions, stamped on 03/29/21 by Steven C. Wellington, is approved with the following conditions: a. Note#7: Revise to state the landscape easement is required on both the north and the south side of W. Fred Smith Street, and depict said easement on the plat; b. Add the instrument numbers for easement notes 8-10,as shown on Sheet 3 of 5. c. Note#6: Revise to say West Franklin Road instead of East Franklin Road; also include the City of Meridian. d. Revise Note#10 to note a cross-access easement and maintenance agreement since no private street has been applied for OR apply for Private Street approval prior to final plat signature. 5. Prior to City Engineer signature on this final plat,revise the landscape plans shown in Section V.C,prepared by Breckon Land Design, dated 12/02/21, as follows: a. Show the required 20-foot landscape buffer along the north side of the extended collector street(W. Fred Smith Street). b. Show the existing access points from Lots 3 &4,Block 1 to Franklin Road to be closed as required with the preliminary plat. c. Remove the landscaping shown adjacent to the Morrow property along W. Fred Smith Street as it is not part of the plat and will not be installed. 6. Prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat,the applicant shall provide the recorded cross-access and maintenance agreement with West Ada School District(WASD) and Republic Services to allow these agencies to utilize the private driveway across Lot 2,Block 1 to access W. Fred Smith Street. 7. Prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat,provide planning staff with proof of a cross- access easement between Lot 4, Block 1 and the Morrow property and show/note said easement on the plat. 8. The Applicant shall obtain Administrative Design Review and Certificate of Zoning Compliance approval for all future structures within the subdivision,where applicable,prior to applying for building permits on each site. 9. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. Page 9 Page 149 Item#7. A. PUBLIC WORKS SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: 1. No permanent structures including but not limited to trees,bushes, fences, buildings, etc. shall be allowed in any City utility easement. It appears there are multiple spots where trees and shrubs are in conflict with the utility easements,these must be removed. 2. The applicant shall provide geotechnical or soils information to be reviewed prior to signature of the final plat. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer,an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-313-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements,prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy,a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. Page 10 Page 150 Item#7. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans.This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility,or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed,and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in Page 11 Page 151 Item#7. the development, and if so, how they will continue to be used, or provide record of their abandonment. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Page 12 Page 152 Item#7. Joseph Dodson From: kent brown <kentlkb@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 3:43 PM To: Joseph Dodson Cc: Brad Miller; Adrienne Weatherly; Bill Nary; Charlene Way; Chris Johnson; Kurt Starman; Ted Baird; Bill Parsons Subject: Re: Revised Final Plat External Sender-Please use caution with links or attachments. The Developer has reviewed the conditions of approval and are in agreement and will can comply Kent Brown On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 10:37 AM Joseph Dodson <idodson@meridiancity.org>wrote: Hello, Attached is a REVISED staff report for the final plat for Chewie Subdivision. This item is scheduled to be on the consent agenda at the City Council work session on September 14, 2021. The meeting will be held at City Hall, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, beginning at 4:30 pm. Please call or e-mail with any questions. Please submit a written response to the staff report to the City Clerk's office (cityclerk@meridiancitV.org) and me as soon as possible. IF you are not in agreement with the staff report, the item will be placed on the regular meeting agenda at a subsequent meeting for discussion. Thank you, Joseph Dodson I Current Associate Planner City of Meridian I Community Development 33 E. Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208.884.5533 � E Built for Business, Designed for Living All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, 1 Page 153 77 C� E IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Order for Prevail Subdivision No. 3 (FP-2021-0044) by Schultz Development, Located Approximately% Mile South of E. Amity Rd., East of S. Meridian Rd. BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 14, 2021 ORDER APPROVAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 28, 2021 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT ) CONSISTING OF 18 BUILDING ) CASE NO. FP-2021-0044 LOTS AND 2 COMMON LOTS ON ) 5.25 ACRES OF LAND IN THE R-8 ) ORDER OF CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT FOR PREVAIL ) APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION NO. 3. ) BY: Triple D Development, Inc. ) APPLICANT ) This matter coming before the City Council on September 14, 2021 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-613-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat,the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of"PLAT SHOWING PREVAIL SUBDIVISION NO. 3, LOCATED IN THE PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 3N, RANGE, IE, BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2021, HANDWRITTEN DATE: AUGUST 4, 2021, by ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(Prevail Subdivision No. 3 (Prevail North—FILE#FP-2021-0044) Page 1 of 3 Gregory G. Carter, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 3," is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated September 14, 2021, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked"Exhibit A" and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Matt Schultz, Applicant Representative, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked "Exhibit B" and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(Prevail Subdivision No. 3 (Prevail North—FILE#FP-2021-0044) Page 2 of 3 issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight(28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 28th day of September , 2021. By: Robert E. Simison 9-28-2021 Mayor, City of Meridian Attest: Chris Johnson 9-28-2021 City Clerk Copy served upon the Applicant,Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 9-28-2021 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(Prevail Subdivision No. 3 (Prevail North—FILE#FP-2021-0044) Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY N -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT !A H O DATE: 9/14/2021 y Legend TO: City Council ElProject Location FROM: Joseph Dodson,Associate Planner -------- 208-884-5533 T� SUBJECT: FP-2021-0044 Prevail No. 3 Subdivision Final Plat i PROPERTY LOCATION: The site is located approximately '/4 mile south of E. Amity Road, East of S. -----, Meridian Road, in the NW '/4 of the NW ' '/4 of Section 31, Township 3N.,Range 1 E. 1 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A final plat consisting of 18 single family residential lots and 2 common lots on 5.25 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district,by Schultz Development. This is the final plat for the Prevail North preliminary plat(H-2021-0021);Ada County is requiring it be final platted as the third phase of the Prevail Subdivision ft.a. Percy Subdivision). II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Schultz Development LLC B. Owner: Triple D Development, Inc. —PO Box 2670, Eagle, ID 83616 C. Representative: Matt Schultz, Schultz Development LLC—PO Box 1115, Meridian, ID 83680 III. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed final plat consists of 18 building lots and 2 common lots in the R-8 zoning district. The submitted final plat matches the preliminary plat approved by City Council in lot number, lot size, and open space. The Applicant has also received Alternative Compliance approval (A-2021-0174) to reduce the required landscape buffer common lot along Meridian Road/SH 69, per the preliminary Page 1 Item#8. plat conditions; the overall landscape buffer is at least 50' wide exceeding UDC requirements. Because the number of building lots and the amount of common open space is the same as in the approved preliminary plat, staff finds the proposed final plat to be in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required by UDC 11-6B-3 C.2. IV. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section VI of this report. Page 2 Page 159 V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(dated: May 7, 202 1) 1 7 Os p 4 42, @ ----------------- --�gg� ------------- E-4 < Y ---------- t Page 3 Item#8. B. Final Plat(dated: August 4, 2021) €= o x c$ gEv £ w�w's x°ea3,w h�g ag - o> ��a A r � �� —x°'z°'m•w � I I � ��' � �� $pp�€z� \\ 1 fm .55i CYL� ® $i O • � O O d O I � w � I m----N°'2a31•w-- i - �-,o Q O so i sso �ink I I � 6 O �$l�� W w W 'r W a ; W '•' W . _ I W r ____xo•x°•a,w._._ � R R f 3 r � _$ $ _�' _ fl e d ;� Y liZ I I� � Q I$I O r � 'x "- ,� � 's � � � „ 's ^ � § •g �• w h � g —o xow9,w °18888� O I • • � �F a� g 8 8 889n8 F 9 7 sx¢YpORTAVE S �q z�N a. m'##� 3 Y ti O� -xo7a3rw---, I g o o o 3� asUF z I a gsc� z i o W L�9 n°za3,w �Ia� e - � oe Wa<eLL �o� � o s o =„ was'"'§ IL n m� �o's� LL�P, Ica _ 5 <��€ € ;. eaQ€ a N¢a � �-a�, �. g k g' - 18 2 m� �a a= _. -4LI; 5 �s f �, ��< ��< <o z 'spa s • �. g§� �x ,0010E 3.951i.°M _ 1 'UM tiUIS'IAIQ&fl S' 'm r ��,00'LOL 3,95.LLANO _ - � 7IYl3Hd $ EYOT m $y qR H� II as WOO"'s o a _ A ,is Irsa M 9s isve y axlav3e so 55re Page 4 Page 161 Eil C. Landscape Plan(dated: August 9, 2021 n00C] NougngsNoo N -1d �JdVOSCJNV� V S9 0HV41 NVICIIH�]Vl - will OU WOWN S 04 S 'ON NOISIAicions -11VA3Ud 16 A A U LLJ cc I h N' CZ g� 11% PHI" 52 Bpi INS 1 EW it INP to W 1 11 CHO-1, too MR Nit 10111 51,11!hODHI pill; am" '" Hug 4 qjy�w- v�Ig IR ;gig go 1 001 imp W go 1 1 1 MR No R ❑ Not 10 1 VON 1 MMN is IN Ap IN Nil 0§01 �MIN E) MINH 11 Qvillm, H-15 51HIRPIMIg Q ........... HE - Rog ty- IBM Page 5 S1Nawnooa Nouondl-N SWAG NVOSONIS V ....... ZKS9 0WOMMORLIV, i 12-71M. ', a --it GV0d NVIGIU3N S 0S E ON NOBNOWS -TVAL m-1 Nil d 4 11 1 14111, 4 Nq I SOR i 10 ;11 1 pill! 1 AT 11 aRR 1 H "N to Ohl 1 1 1gi a pd,"1 1, ISO I a MR I I gj 1 a - I a M01 I HAM I w 01h 1 His, 110101 Oil 10 III= z M 1 d d t'l j Hill 01110 too cps ly 1 I z will Lu 4 IL -Ul tl w_q pstzi�i gs g gig MTN 111 d L v �r 7 m w `� � �, J ��y�U -J��/��J LU Atwo lot Page 6 Item#8. VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division 1. The applicant shall comply with all applicable conditions of approval associated with this site: H- 2021-0021 (Prevail North Subdivision); and DA Inst. #2021-126848. 2. The applicant has until two years following City Council approval of the preliminary plat(July 6, 2021)to obtain City Engineer signature on this final plat, or apply for a time extension in accord with UDC 11-613-7. 3. The final plat prepared by Idaho Survey Group,LLC, dated 8/04/2021, shall be revised as follows: • Add a plat note stating: "Subdivision is subject to a City of Meridian Development Agreement recorded as Instrument No. 2021-126848." • Label the irrigation district easement for the rerouted lateral along the north property boundary. 4. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer,the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster, at(208) 887-1620 for more information. 5. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat does not relieve the applicant of responsibility for compliance. 6. The applicant shall construct single family detached dwellings in accord with the recorded development agreement. 7. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy on any building,the applicant shall submit a public access easement for the multi-use pathway segment along Meridian Road to the Planning Division for approval by City Council and subsequent recordation. The easement shall be a minimum of 14' in width(10' pathway and 2' shoulder on each side). 8. Upon completion of the landscape installation, a written Certificate of Completion shall be submitted to the Planning Division verifying all landscape improvements are in substantial compliance with the approved landscape plan as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14. B. Public Works Division SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: 1. Sewer services must tie into the sewer main at 90 degrees, or come out of a manhole. The sewer service for Lot 33,Block 1 currently does not meet this requirement. 2. No permanent structure including but not limited to trees,bushes,fences,streetlights,and buildings shall be allowed in a City utility easement. Currently there are trees and shrubs shown within the water easement area. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. Page 7 Page 164 Item#8. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements,prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy,a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-413. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage Page 8 Page 165 Item#8. facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans.This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility,or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development, and if so, how they will continue to be used, or provide record of their abandonment. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Page 9 Page 166 Item#8. Joseph Dodson From: Matt Schultz <schultzdevelopment@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, September 2, 2021 7:49 PM To: Adrienne Weatherly; Bill Nary; Charlene Way; Chris Johnson; Kurt Starman; Ted Baird;Joseph Dodson Cc: Bill Parsons Subject: Re: Prevail No. 3 Final Plat External Sender-Please use caution with links or attachments. thank you Joseph...looks good Matt Schultz Schultz Development LLC (208) 880-1695 On Thursday, September 2, 2021, 04:58:08 PM MDT, Joseph Dodson <jdodson@meridiancity.org>wrote: Hello, Attached is the staff report for the final plat for Prevail No 3. (Prevail North). This item is scheduled to be on the consent agenda at the City Council work session on September 14, 2021. The meeting will be held at City Hall, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, beginning at 4:30 pm. Please call or e-mail with any questions. Matt, please submit a written response to the staff report to the City Clerk's office (cityclerk(d)-me rid iancity.org) and me as soon as possible. IF you are not in agreement with the staff report, the item will be placed on the regular meeting agenda at a subsequent meeting for discussion. Thank you, Joseph Dodson I Current Associate Planner City of Meridian I Community Development 33 E. Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208.884.5533 1 1 Page 167 Lz:J#8EN�!n— Built for Business, Designed for Living All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in regards to both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law. z Page 168 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Briar Ridge Subdivision (H-2021- 0036) by Gem State Planning, Located on the West Side of Meridian Rd. Between W. Lake Hazel Rd. and W. Amity Rd., Directly South of the Mid-Mile Point CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW E IDIAN�' AND DECISION& ORDER A In the Matter of the Request to Rezone a total of 40.99 acres of land from the R-4 zoning district to the TN-R zoning district(Traditional Neighborhood Residential); a Preliminary Plat consisting of 227 single-family residential building lots and 47 common lots on 38.86 acres of land; and a Modification to the existing development agreement(Inst.#2016-007070),as required by the existing development agreement provisions,for the purpose of updating the development plan to redevelop the subject property consistent with the proposed preliminary plat,by Jane Suggs,Gem State Planning. Case No(s). H-2021-0036 For the City Council Hearing Date of: September 14, 2021 (Findings on September 28,2021) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 14,2021, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 14, 2021, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 14, 2021,incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 14,2021, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65, Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17, 2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Briar Ridge Subdivision RZ,MDA,PP—FILE#H-2021-0036) - 1 - Item#9. Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 14,2021,incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's requests for Rezone,Development Agreement Modification, and Preliminary Plat are hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of September 14,2021, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two (2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with I I-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two (2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I- 6B-7C). Notice of Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit,when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time,the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting,the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two(2)year period. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Briar Ridge Subdivision RZ,MDA,PP—FILE#H-2021-0036) -2- Page 171 Item#9. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-5B-6.G.1,the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one(1)two (2)year period.Additional time extensions up to two (2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11(UDC 11-5B-6F). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter.When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of September 14, 2021 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Briar Ridge Subdivision RZ,MDA,PP—FILE#H-2021-0036) -3- Page 172 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 28th day of September 2021. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison 9-28-2021 Attest: Chris Johnson 9-28-2021 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 9-28-2021 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Briar Ridge Subdivision RZ,MDA,PP—FILE#H-2021-0036) EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY N -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 9/14/2021 Legend DATE: Project Location TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Joe Dodson,Associate Planner i----- 1 - ----- ---- 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: H-2021-0036 - Briar Ridge Subdivision ' LOCATION: The site is located on the west side of Meridian Road between W. Lake Hazel Road and W. Amity Road,directly south of the mid-mile point, in the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 36,Township 3N., - ----T Range 1W. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION • Rezone a total of 40.99 acres of land from the R-4 zoning district to the TN-R zoning district (Traditional Neighborhood Residential); • Preliminary Plat consisting of 227 single-family residential building lots and 47 common lots on 38.86 acres of land; and • Modification to the existing development agreement(Inst. #2016-007070), as required by the existing development agreement provisions, for the purpose of updating the development plan to redevelop the subject property consistent with the proposed preliminary plat. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage RZ—40.99;Plat—38.86 acres Future Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential(3-8 du/ac)and Medium-High Density Residential 8-12 du/ac Existing Land Uses Vacant land Proposed Land Uses Detached and Attached Single-family Residential Lots #and e;bldg./common) 227 single-family residential building lots;47 common lots Phasing Plan #ofphases) Proposed as three 3phases Number of Residential Units 227 single-family units(123 detached; 104 attached townhomes Density Gross—5.84 du/ac over entire project area. Open Space(acres,total 7.7 acres total;4.52 acres of qualified open space Pagel Item#9. Description Details Page /buffer/ ualified (approximately 11.8% per submitted open s ace exhibit. Amenity At least four(4)qualifying site amenities—Children's play structure,picnic shelters throughout,multi-use pathway along Meridian Road(SH 69),and open space in excess of code requirements(large central pocket park). Physical Features(waterways, Mcbirney Lateral crosses the north half of the property. hazards,flood plain,hillside) Applicant is proposing to pipe and reroute this lateral to be included in open space and incorporate a connection to the multi-use pathway along SH 69. Neighborhood meeting date;#of December 8,2020—One(1)attendee;April 21,2021 —No attendees: attendees History(previous approvals) H-2015-0019 South Meridian Annexation B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Not a4 this time Yes • Requires ACHD No Commission Action es/no • Traffic Impact Study Yes—Both ITD and ACHD have reviewed the TIS. es/no Access Main access to the development is proposed via a new collector street at the (Arterial/Collectors/State mid-mile mark along the north property boundary,per the Master Street Hwy/Local)(Existing and Map.Direct access to lots is via new local streets prosed within the site. Proposed) Stub Applicant is proposing two stub streets to the west and a relatively large Street/Interconnectivity/Cross segment of local street along the south boundary.Adjacent sites are not yet Access developed so future development would connect to these stub streets. Existing Road Network= No Existing Arterial Sidewalks/ No—Meridian Road/SH 69 frontage is not yet improved.Applicant is Buffers required to construct and vegetate the required buffer and include a detached, 10-foot wide multi-use pathway along the entire frontage;the Applicant has proposed compliance with these items in their development. Future Road Improvements • Amity Road is scheduled in the CIP to be widened to 5-lanes from Meridian Road(SH-69)to (CIP/IFYWP) Locust Grove Road between 2036 and 2040. • Lake Hazel Road is listed in the CIP to 5-lanes from Meridian Road(SH-69)to Locust Grove Road between 2036 and 2040. • The intersection of Amity Road and Meridian Road(SH-69)is listed in the CIP to be widened to 6-lanes on the north leg,6-lanes on the south,7-lanes east,and 7-lanes on the west leg, and signalized between 2031 and 2035. • The intersection of Lake Hazel Road and Meridian Road (SH-69)is listed in the CIP to be widened to 6-lanes on the north leg,6-lanes on the south,7-lanes on the east,and 7-lanes on the west leg and signalized between 2036 and 2040. Fire Service • Distance to Fire 3.6 miles from Fire Station#6(Approximately 2 miles from proposed fire Station station#7 on Lake Hazel;response time would then fall within the 5- minute response time area. • Fire Response Time Project currently does not reside within the Meridian Fire 5-minute response time goal area. • Resource Reliability Fire Station#6 reliability is 87%(above the goal of 80%) • Risk Identification Risk Factor 1—Residential • Accessibility • Proposed project meets all required road widths,and turnaround Page 2 Page 175 Item#9. Description Details Page dimensions. • Submitted phasing plan shall be strictly adhered to with regards to the timing of the secondary access to Meridian Road. Police Service • Distance to Station Approximately 4.5 miles from Meridian Police Department • Response Time Approximately 3.5-minute response time to an emergency(Priority 3 call) • Call Data Between 6/1/2019-5/31/2021,the Meridian Police Department responded to 188 calls for service within a mile of the proposed development.The crime count on the calls for service was 4. See attached documents for details. Between 6/1/2019-5/31/2021,the Meridian Police Department responded to 7 crashes within a mile of the proposed development. See attached documents for details. West Ada School District Estimated Additional School 159 estimated children at full build out(.7 per SF dwelling, .1 per MF Aged Children dwelling) • Distance(elem,ms,hs) 1.6 miles to Mary McPherson Elementary 3.8 miles to Victory Middle School 7.2 miles to Meridian View High School • Capacity of Schools Mary McPherson Elementary—675 students Victory Middle School— 1,000 students Meridian High School—2,075 students • #of Students Enrolled Mary McPherson Elementary—461 students Victory Middle School—976 students Meridian High School— 1,865 students School of Choice Options Christine Donnell Elementary(Arts)—6.8 miles away(505 enrolled w/capacity of 500) Spalding Elementary(STEM)—8.9 miles away(677 enrolled w/capacity of 750) Wastewater • Distance to Sewer N/A Services • Sewer Shed South Black Cat Trunkshed • Estimated Project See application Sewer ERU's • WRRF Declining 14.16 Balance • Project Consistent Yes with WW Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts/Concerns • Flow is committed • In greenfield projects sewer services should not pass through infiltration trenches,as currently designed there are multiple areas where this occurs. • Current plans show 8" sewer line going to-and-through to the west parcel.If to-and-through is desired,then line must be upsized to match Master Plan as this would be the main line feeding the surrounding sewer shed.If sewer does not go to-and-through,then an 8"line is acceptable. Water • Distance to Services 900' Page 3 Page 176 Item#9. Description Details Page • Pressure Zone 5 • Estimated Project See application Water ERU's • Water Quality None Concerns • Project Consistent Yes with Water Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns • Do not install water line down Meridian Rd. from Amity Rd.Instead extend 12"line along E.Quartz Rd from the Prevail Subdivision. • Applicant to donate well lot • A 12"main is required in W Quartz Creek St down to the subdivisions southeast corner;this will require upsizing several sections of main through the subdivision. COMPASS—Communities in Motion 2040 2.0 Review Housing w/in 1 mile 230 Jobs w/in 1 mile 120 • Ratio 0.5—Indicates an employment need(ratio between 1-1.5 is considered a healthy job/housing ratio) Farmland Consumed? Yes(936 acres of farmland w/in 1 mile of project) Nearest Bus Stop 3.3 miles Nearest Public School 1.2 miles Nearest Public Park 1.7 miles Nearest Grocery Store 3.7 miles(an Albertson's grocery store is under construction within 3 miles) Recommendations See agency comment section for link to full document. Distance to nearest City Park 1.7 miles to Discovery Park(76.88 acres in size but only phase 1 is (+size) constructed)to the southeast of the project. Page 4 Page 177 Item#9. C. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map 1 Legend Legend MU-C � Project Location aProject Location Medium Density - Residential - Med- Iv Den Low ensity Resid Residential 4 MU RG Zoning Map Planned Development Map Legend RUT i-L 0 Legend Project Location RUT Project Location t� ' L ' CQ y! City Limits Planned Parcels R-8� R-8 R-4 RUT R-2 RUT RUT R-4 R-8 R-15 C-G RUT R=15 ' R=G '- R-4 ' RUT ' RR iR14- 111. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Jane Suggs, Gem State Planning—9840 W. Overland Road, Suite 120,Boise,ID 83709 B. Owner: Endurance Holdings,LLC— 1977 E. Overland Road,Meridian,ID 83642 C. Representative: Same as Applicant Page 5 Page 178 Item#9. IV. NOTICING Planning&Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper Notification 7/23/2021 8/27/2021 Radius notification mailed to properties within 500 feet 7/20/2021 8/25/2021 Site Posting 7/30/2021 8/31/2021 Nextdoor posting 7/20/2021 8/26/2021 V. STAFF ANALYSIS A. Future Land Use Map Designation(https:llwww.meridianciu.or /e compplan) Medium Density Residential(MDR)—This designation allows for dwelling units at gross densities of three to eight dwelling units per acre. Density bonuses may be considered with the provision of additional public amenities such as a park, school, or land dedicated for public services. Medium-High Density Residential(MHDR)—This designation allows for a mix of dwelling types including townhouses, condominiums, and apartments. Residential gross densities should range from eight to twelve dwelling units per acre. These areas are relatively compact within the context of larger neighborhoods and are typically located around or near mixed use commercial or employment areas to provide convenient access to services and jobs for residents. Developments need to incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place and should also incorporate connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways, attractive landscaping and a project identity. The subject site is approximately 40 acres and was annexed into the City in 2015 with many other parcels in this area of the City under the "South Meridian Annexation."It is located on the south side of the mid-mile mark on the west side of Meridian Road between Lake Hazel and Amity Roads; it is directly west of Shafer View Drive and the recently approved Shafer View Terrace annexation and preliminary plat(H-2020-0117) located on the east side of Meridian Road. With two future land use designations bisecting the subject site, the Applicant may choose to use one or both designations. How each designation is utilized is largely up to the Applicant when more than one exists within a project site; this includes the proposed project density. Briar Ridge is proposed with 227 building lots on 38.86 acres at a gross density of 5.84 du/acre which falls in the middle of the allowable density in the MDR designation on the property. However, the requested TN-R zoning district requires a minimum net density of 6 du/acre. Staff has more analysis and recommendations below on this subject. The proposed development meets the required density allowed on the property for the more restrictive designation which shows Staff that the Applicant is not merely trying to develop the highest number of units possible. Theoretically, the Applicant could have proposed a project with twice the density and still been compliant with the allowable density due to the inclusion of the MHDR designation on the site. Despite proposing a project density consistent with MDR, the Applicant is aware of the existing commercial zoning to the south (also part of the South Meridian Annexation) and its future land use designation of Mixed-Use Regional which would likely incorporate higher intensity development, both commercial and residential. Thus, the Applicant proposed its higher density product in the southeast quadrant of the site by placing the alley-loaded townhoues in this area. In addition, to further assist with the future transition to the south and along Meridian Road, the Applicant is proposing a local street directly on the shared Page 6 Page 179 Item#9. property boundary between the alley loaded homes and the existing C-G property—Staff believes this site design offers flexibility and buffering from the proposed residential and future development to the south while transitioning to more traditional detached single-family as the project moves north. Rezone: When the subject property was annexed into the City of Meridian in 2015 it was zoned R-4 to help delineate that this property would be developed as residential. The Development Agreement that was created as part of this original annexation dictated that the City would have services available as soon as possible and the first Rezone application would be free of charge. This stipulation regarding a Rezone application was made because the annexation was City initiated and the property had no concept plan or specific development planned at the time of annexation; the City understood future development may not match the existing zoning and gave future applicants the opportunity to propose a different zoning with a new development plan. The Applicant's request to rezone to the Traditional Neighborhood Residential(TN--R)zoning district is, in itself, consistent with the future land use designations because it is a residential district. More importantly, the overall site design proposed by the Applicant is consistent with the comprehensive plan and the future land use designations because of the transitional density proposed, the multiple housing types proposed, the inclusion of parkways throughout the entire development, and the extension of a collector street along the north boundary for future connectivity. Staff believes the request for a traditional neighborhood zoning district in this area of the City may lay the groundwork for future development to its south to also include traditional neighborhood design and make future developments more pedestrian focused and walkable. Development Agreement Modification: The same stipulation regarding the Rezone application applies to the first Development Agreement Modification (MDA)for this property. In fact, the existing DA requires that with any future redevelopment an MDA is required to be submitted. Therefore, the Applicant has submitted an MDA to satisfy this requirement and update the development plan, in order to develop the proposed subdivision. The DA will be tied to the submitted preliminary plat and be required to develop the property per the submitted plans and proposed housing types. Staff finds the proposed project and the requested applications to be generally consistent with the future land use designations within this project site. Specific Comprehensive Plan policies are discussed and analyzed in the next section. Page 7 Page 180 Item#9. B. Comprehensive Plan Policies (https://www.meridiancity.or /g compplan): The applicable Comprehensive Plan policies are cited below with Staff analysis in italics. "Avoid the concentration of any one housing type or lot size in any geographical area; provide for diverse housing types throughout the City" (2.01.01G). The subject project is proposed with a site design that closely resembles traditional neighborhood design with short block lengths, street trees,pedestrian facilities throughout, and three housing types within this one project. Thus, the Applicant is requesting a rezone from the R-4 district to the TN-R zoning district to have zoning that fits the proposed housing types of detached single-family, alley loaded single-family, and attached single-family townhomes with parkways throughout the project. In addition, the proposed housing types will vary greatly from the Shafer View Estates'larger lots to the east and thus offering more housing diversity in this area of the city. "Preserve,protect, and provide open space for recreation, conservation, and aesthetics" (4.05.01F). The Applicant is proposing open space in excess of code requirements with a large open space lot in the north half of the site and two relatively smaller linear open space areas in the south half of the project. In addition, the project is proposed with parkways and street trees throughout the entire site offering more open space that would be used for recreation and aesthetics. Further analysis on the proposed open space is below in Section V.L. "Promote area beautification and community identity through context sensitive building and site design principles, appropriate signage, and attractive landscaping."(5.01.02C). The requested TN-R zoning district requires more than one housing type and streets that include parkways and street trees. With parkways, sidewalks are further removed from the public street making for safer pedestrian facilities and encouraging more pedestrian activity. Because of the desired project aesthetic by the Applicant and the requirements of the traditional neighborhood zoning district the proposed project is creating its own identity through site design and thoughtful landscaping and pedestrian elements. "Require pedestrian access in all new development to link subdivisions together and promote neighborhood connectivity."(2.02.01D).Proposed project is not directly adjacent to any other development at this time. However, the Applicant is proposing parkways with detached sidewalks throughout the entire site and constructing a multi-use pathway segment along the entire Meridian Road frontage; both of these design elements would offer ample pedestrian connectivity within the site and to future development, specifically to the adjacent property to the south that is designated as Mixed-Use Regional on the future land use map. "Require proposed development within areas further away from urban services,existing utilities or requiring significant City utility upgrades,to demonstrate fiscal benefits, strategic fit with the Comprehensive Plan, contiguity with existing development,and appropriate mitigation for any impacts to existing City service users." (3.03.02F).Because the extension of utility services will be fully financed by the Applicant, the specific concern of the City expending funds for utilities is minimal. However, there is evidence that developing this parcel does not constitute orderly development because of the longer extension of services needed to serve the project. Beyond utilities, urban services also include adjacent transportation facilities, employment opportunities, and commercial services like grocery stores, gas stations, and even general retail, office, and restaurant uses. Staff does not find that the Applicant has fully demonstrated this project has a strategic fit with the Comprehensive Plan. "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and urban services at the time of final approval, and in accord with any adopted levels of service for public facilities and services." (3.03.03F).All of the essential urban services are relatively far removed from the project site despite other residential development being approved Page 8 Page 181 Item#9. across Meridian Road to the east. For example, the closest gas station is more than 1.5 miles to the north with the next closest being nearly 3 miles away; the closest grocery store is almost 4 miles away. There is no existing commercial within 1.5 miles of this development which automatically requires that future residents would have to utilize their car to get to essential services.Approximately one mile to the east, at the intersection of Lake Hazel and Locust Grove, commercial zoning is approved but any actual construction timeline is unknown as this area has only been platted and no administrative applications have been submitted. In addition, C-G zoning is existing directly to the south of this project site which does allow for future commercial to nearby these proposed residences. Despite this development meeting a majority of the comprehensive plan policies and being proposed with an insightful and carefully considered site design,Staff does have concern on the timing of development for this project only in relation to nearby property development;as discussed above, the City has made commitments to servicing and developing this site through the original annexation in 2015 so Staff does not find any of these concerns to warrant a recommendation of denial. Staff finds this development to be generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, as discussed throughout the above sections and comprehensive plan policies. C. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There are no existing structures on site beyond the existing Mcbirney Lateral that traverses the north third of the site. The historical use for the subject site is agricultural in nature. D. Proposed Use Analysis: The proposed uses within this project are all residential—detached single-family residential, alley-loaded detached single-family, and alley-loaded townhomes.All residential uses proposed are permitted uses within the requested TN-R zoning district per UDC Table 11-2D-2. The TN-R zoning district requires a minimum of two (2)housing types—the proposed housing types offer three(3) distinct housing types and complies with this zoning requirement. The project is proposed to be constructed in three(3)phases according to the submitted phasing plan(Section VILE). Phase 1 is shown to include the new collector street along the north boundary that connects to Meridian Road and is the main access to the development;two local streets are proposed from this new collector street into the site. Phase 1 therefore includes development along the north boundary and also along the east boundary adjacent to Meridian Road; it also includes a number of all three proposed residential housing types but only 30 total homes can be constructed prior to a secondary access being constructed. Per the phasing plan reviewed by Meridian Fire,phase 1 also includes a temporary secondary access to Meridian Road that runs along the east boundary and will eventually be a new local street for phase 2 development, the southeast quadrant of the site. Phase 2 shows almost all of the remaining townhomes and the new local street along the south boundary that would act as a buffer to the south property. Phase 3 is shown with the remaining homes(a majority being detached single- family)and the large open space lot in the north half of the site. Staff supports the proposed phasing plan except for the proposal of the large open space lot being constructed with phase 3. Because the property is relatively removed from other development and open space, Staff finds this large open space lot(Lot 1, Block 3 on the submitted plat)should be part ofphase I development when the first 70 homes are proposed to be constructed. E. Dimensional Standards(UDC 11-2): The requested zoning district of TN-R does not have a minimum lot size requirement but does require a minimum net density of six(6)du/acre. The submitted preliminary plat shows a Page 9 Page 182 Item#9. minimum lot size proposed of 2,082 square feet and an overall average lot size of 3,834 square feet. Because home placement on the building lot is not yet known at the time of preliminary plat submittal, setbacks cannot generally be reviewed at this time. However,per the submitted plat, the residential lots appear to meet all UDC dimensional standards for the TN-R zoning district; this includes compliance with the net density requirement. The Applicant did not provide a net density on the submitted plat but Staff can deduce that the net density is above 6 du/acre because the gross density is so close to that number. Once open space and right-of-way are removed,the net density will easily exceed the minimum requirement of the TN-R zoning district. The Applicant should include the net density calculation on the plat prior to the City Council meeting to show compliance. In addition,all subdivision developments are also required to comply with Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards(UDC 11-6C-3). The proposed preliminary plat and submitted plans appear to meet all UDC requirements. Note: The alleys shown on the plat for the attached units in the southeast quadrant of the project do not meet ACHD policies for an alley because the units front on green space instead of a public road. Therefore, this alley must instead be constructed as a "minor urban local street"which is a minimum of 24 feet wide with curb and gutter and no parking is allowed on either side. Staff is recommending a condition of approval in line with ACHD's condition to ensure this street segment is revised and has coordinated with ACHD to not require sidewalks on these internal "alleys"because the project is proposed with detached sidewalk and parkways throughout the entire development. The Applicant should revise the width of these roads to meet ACHD policy— this may lead to a reduction in green space between these units. F. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): The Applicant submitted conceptual building elevations for the proposed residential dwellings. Note that detached single-family homes do not require Design Review approval therefore Staff does not review these for compliance with any standards. However,townhomes(an attached housing product)do require administrative design review(DES)approval prior to building permit submittal. With that future application submittal Staff will analyze the elevations for the attached townhomes against the Architectural Standards Manual;the DES application should be submitted with the first final plat application. The submitted elevations depict single and two-story homes with two-car garages and varying home styles. The elevations depict differing field materials and designs utilizing lap siding with stone accents and varying roof profiles offering an overall array of potential homes. G. Access(UDC 11-3A-3, 11-3H-4): Access to Briar Ridge is proposed via construction of a new collector street(W. Quartz Creek Street)along the entire north property boundary that connects from the west boundary of the site to Meridian Road/SH 69 at the mid-mile point consistent with the construction of E. Quartz Creek Street on the east side of Meridian Road. The submitted preliminary plat shows W. Quartz Creek to be constructed with 30 feet of pavement within 55 feet of right-of-way and with 5-foot detached sidewalk along the southern edge for the length of this street segment. The remaining roads proposed within this development are local streets that are at least 33 feet wide with 5-foot detached sidewalk and 8-foot parkways creating a beautiful streetscape and identity for the entire project. The exception to this is S. Celestine Avenue in the southeast quadrant of the site that parallels Meridian Road and is proposed as a 28-foot wide street section because no homes take direct access to it and there are no building lots on its east side at all. Page 10 Page 183 Item#9. The Applicant is proposing to construct a secondary access to Meridian Road at the very southeast corner of the site as an emergency access for the Fire Department and potential future connectivity to Meridian Road should ITD determine that future development will allow a restricted access at this location. This access is part of a proposed local street that runs along approximately 2/3 of the southern boundary to act as both a buffer to future development to the south and a stub street to the southern property. In addition to the stub street along the south boundary,the submitted preliminary plat also shows two stubs to the western boundary for future connectivity. ACHD has approved the proposed stub street locations and road network except for the proposed alleys between the townhome units that run north-south (facing east-west). Because these units front on green space instead of a public street,ACHD policy requires these alleys to be constructed as a"minor urban local street"which is a minimum of 24 feet wide with curb A and gutter and no parking is allowed on either side, as noted above in Section V.G. NOTE: Meridian Road/SH 69 is currently being studied Q by the Idaho Transportation Department(ITD) for corridor improvements from Overland Road south to Orchard Avenue in Kuna under the Idaho 69 Corridor (Story Map—Idaho Highway 69 Corridor Plan). The mid-mile intersection at the northeast corner of the subject project is part of this study and is proposed to be designed with a reduced conflict U-turn (RCUT)intersection that eliminates left turns and thru-traffic from lower-volume roads. See exhibit to the right for an example of what the Quartz LOCAL NUM Creek/SH 69 intersection could look like. Proposed Briar Despite proposing to construct a collector street that Ridge connects to SH 69,ITD does not find this as direct Subdivisio access because no buildable lot is proposed with direct n—40 acre lot access to the state highway. This, coupled with this parcel corridor being part of a future project,requires the Applicant to enter into a cost share agreement for the road and intersection improvements in lieu of C c constructing any road improvements with this , development at this time,per the ITD conditions report # ; and their technical report(Section VIII.K). The subject project is proposed with over 100 units so a Traffic Impact Study(TIS)was required. Due to the ' property requiring access to Meridian Road/SH 69,the ; Applicant was required to submit the TIS to both ACHD and ITD. Staff s summary of this report and analysis is below. Traffic Impact Study Analysis: Reduced Conflict -Turn Crfm.s ng The Applicant's traffic impact study has been analyzed by ACHD and ITD and specific conditions of approval are outlined in their staff reports(see exhibits in Section VIII). Despite Page 11 Page 184 Item#9. ACHD analyzing and discussing the TIS in their own report, Staff finds it necessary to highlight the main points of discussion and road improvement requirements, specifically those related to the main access points for the project. Staff has not weeived theA CMD staff re analjw&into this mpom. Staff is not eoneernedwith the om&sion of this informadon beeaHse According to the submitted TIS, this development is estimated to generate 1,994 vehicle trips per day; 184 trips per hour in the PM peak hour. The TIS analyzed the access point to the development via the new collector street as well as the two closest arterial intersections on Meridian Road,Amity&Meridian Road and Lake Hazel&Meridian Road intersections. The TIS found that each roadway segment in the study meets acceptable levels ofservice during peak hour traffic but notes the Amity&Meridian Road intersection does not.ACHD is not requiring any miti atgione or this project because this intersection is under the jurisdiction ofITD, it is scheduled to be widened between 2031 &2035, and the proposed site taff c would constitute less than 10%of the total traffic(3.8%) at the Amity&Meridian Road intersection. As discussed above,ACHD has minimal iurisdiction on the off-site intersections and the proposed connection point to Meridian Road/SH 69.ACHD notes the Applicant is being recommended to participate in a proportional cost-share agreement for future highway road improvements.ACHD approves of all other accesses and the overall road layout of the development with noted conditions to meet road width policies, none of which chanze the project in any noticeable means. H. Parking(UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table H- 3C-6 for single-family dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. Staff will confirm compliance with these standards at the time of building permit submittal for each residence. However, all of the local streets are proposed as at least 33-foot wide street sections which accommodates on-street parking where no driveways exist. Furthermore,because of the proposed alley-loaded homes and inclusion of parkways,the entire length of streets adjacent to the alley- loaded products can be utilized for on-street parking. The proposed site design within the traditional neighborhood districts allows for on-street parking in numbers not generally seen in common single-family developments. Staff appreciates this design for the area of the site that has the most density. The townhomes in this project are proposed with two car garages and include the required parking pad. To further help with parking concerns common to single-family development the Applicant has proposed four(4) small parking lots in the center of the townhome products to offer additional off-street parking. However, because of the possibility of ample on-street parking in addition to the required off- street parking, the Applicant is not required to provide these other off-street parking areas. Each parking area is at least 5,100 square feet which could provide for more usable open space and inclusion of an additional child focused amenity in this area of the site. Removing these parking areas would have no effect on the number of required off-street parking spaces which must be constructed on each building lot to satisfy code. I. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-17)&Pathways (UDC 11-3A-8): 5-foot wide detached sidewalks and 8-foot parkway are proposed along all internal streets consistent with the requirements for the requested TN-R zoning district. The Applicant is also proposing detached sidewalk on the south side of the new collector street along the north Page 12 Page 185 Item#9. boundary as required by code for sidewalks adjacent to collector streets. The proposed sidewalks and parkways meet UDC 11-3A-17 standards and ACHD standards. In addition to the internal sidewalks,the Applicant is required to construct a segment of 10-foot wide multi-use pathway along the Meridian Road frontage,per the Master Pathways Plan. The Applicant is showing this required pathway segment within a landscaped common lot,per code requirements. The Applicant is also proposing to continue the multi-use pathway into the site over top of the Mcbirney Lateral being piped and rerouted with this development. This extension of the multi-use pathway splits a group of alley-loaded detached homes, crosses two streets, and connects to the large open space lot in the center of the north half of the project. To help with pedestrian safety,the Applicant should provide striping or other traffic calming(i.e. bulb-outs)at the crossing points of this pathway. J. Development Along State Highways(UDC 11-3H): The full east boundary of the proposed project has frontage along Meridian Road/SH 69 which requires noise abatement per UDC 11-3H-4. The Applicant is proposing to construct a 4-foot berm with a 6-foot Rhino Rock wall on top of it to total at least 10 feet above SH 69 centerline height, as required by code. This wall,berm, landscaping, and required multi-use pathway is located within the required 35-foot wide common lot along the entire frontage and outside of the ITD right-of-way. The required wall should modulate along the highway frontage;the submitted landscape plans show compliance with this requirement. UDC 11-3H-4B.3 also requires construction of a"street, generally paralleling the state highway, to provide future connectivity and access to all properties fronting the state highway..."The Applicant has shown compliance with this requirement by proposing to construct a portion of the mid-mile collector along the north boundary, a series of local streets connecting north-south through the site, and proposing to construct a portion of a local street along the southern boundary that acts as future access and a buffer between this project and future development to the south. Other analysis regarding other access standards of this code section are analyzed above in Section F. K. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): The required landscaping regulated by code within the proposed development are the following areas: that area within the proposed parkways(UDC 11-3A-17 and UDC 11-313); the common open space lots, and;the required landscape buffer to Meridian Road. The submitted landscape plans show landscaping in these areas as proposed. 8-foot wide parkways are proposed throughout the site to comply with the zoning requirements of the TN-R zoning district. Parkways are required to be vegetated with an average of 1 tree per every 35 linear feet to be compliant. The submitted landscape plan appears to show compliance with this requirement but the calculations table does not note the linear feet of parkway and the required number of trees; the Applicant should correct this with the Final Plat submittals to ensure compliance with this requirement. In addition, common open space is required to be landscaped with one(1) tree for every 8,000 square feet of open space. The submitted landscape plans show trees and vegetation that vastly exceeds the minimum UDC requirements for these areas. The landscape buffer along Meridian Road is required to be 35'wide and contain the required multi-use pathway within it. The submitted landscape plans show compliance with these UDC requirements for the buffer width, number of trees, tree spacing/grouping, and additional vegetative ground cover; the submitted plat is consistent with the landscape plan and also shows at least a 35 foot wide common lot along Meridian Road. Page 13 Page 186 Item#9. The Applicant is also proposing a number of micro pathways within common area with a majority of them proposed between groups of the attached townhome product in the southeast quadrant of the site. UDC 11-3B-12 requires that trees be placed on both sides of these pathways and the submitted landscape plan shows compliance. L. Qualified Open Space and Amenities (UDC 11-3G): Briar Ridge is proposed with a preliminary plat area of 38.86 acres requiring at least two(2) amenities and a minimum of 10%qualified open space(or 3.89 acres),per UDC 11-3G-3. The Applicant is continuing a segment of multi-use pathway along the Meridian Road frontage which qualifies as a required amenity. In addition to the pathway,the Applicant is proposing multiple shade structures and a playground in the development, exceeding the minimum number of amenities required. With Staff s recommended changes to the parking areas between the townhome units, an additional child focused amenity should be added to one of those areas to create closer access for any children in this part of the development. Staff does not recommend using a playground but instead utilize a different type of child amenity to offer an additional option for the entire development(i.e. climbing boulders or other playground climbing structures). The Applicant's open space exhibit(Section VII.D) shows 7.7 acres of open space with 4.52 acres of qualified open space, exceeding the minimum required amount of 3.89 acres. However, the Applicant's qualified open space calculation does not include any of the parkways within the development which is qualifying open space. The Applicant does not need to use this area as qualified open space to meet the minimum 10%amount and parkways are required as part of the site design for the requested TN-R zoning district. So, Staff is not concerned the open space exhibit does not show this area. Therefore,the actual proposed qualified open space vastly exceeds the minimum amount required by code. Overall, Staff supports the proposed open space but does have recommended revisions for the large open space lot(Lot 1, Block 3) in the north half of the development to make it more open and eliminate potential crime issues. First,Staff recommends shifting the block of homes on the south end of this open space lot(Lots 18-25,Block 3)to the east to have more room on the west end of this block. Secondly,Staff recommends moving at least two lots from the west boundary of this open space lot(Lots 13-17,Block 3)to the south boundary to front on W.Aventurine St. and match the home placement on the north side of this open space lot. This appears to require a loss of three (3) lots based on dimensions but the Applicant may be able to recover the lost lots by incorporating additional townhome units as previously discussed. If the Applicant can make these revisions without losing 3 lots, Staff would also support that as the Applicant is well within the allowable density for this site. This change to the home layout around this open space lot creates a large and linear open space from east to west and more directly connects one of the stub streets on the west boundary to this open space. Which, in turn, has the added benefit of not having future headlights shining directly into the front of homes as would be the case with the current configuration. A Fencing(UDC 11-3A-69 I1-3A-7): All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. Fencing is proposed as shown on the landscape plan and appears to meet UDC standards as proposed except for the 6- foot closed vision fencing proposed adjacent to the large open space lot(Lot 1,Block 3)in the north half of the site and shown on the rear lot line of the homes surrounding this open space lot. Per UDC 11-3A-7A.7b, when an open space lot is greater than 250 feet in length, an open vision or semiprivate fence shall be used. The closed vision fencing shown on the landscape plans does Page 14 Page 187 Item#9. not comply with this code section. The Applicant should revise the landscape plan at the time of the applicable final plat application. Staffs recommendation to make this open space lot more linear in nature does not remove the need for this fencing revision because the lot is deeper than 250 feet. N. Waterways(UDC 11-3A-6): The subject site contains a large section of the Mcbirney Lateral, an irrigation lateral maintained by Boise Project Board of Control(BPBC). The Applicant is proposing to both reroute and pipe this lateral to change the location of its easement and the subsequent encumbrances of said easement. The Applicant has worked with BPBC over the previous 2 years to perform necessary processes prior to submitting to the City of Meridian. Piping this lateral will allow for more consistent and buildable area of the subject site, include additional linear open space for the development, and allow for easier maintenance by BPBC. Staff supports the piping of this irrigation lateral and the proposed plan complies with UDC 11-3A-6. O. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-15): The Applicant is required to provide a pressurized irrigation system for the development in accord with 11-3A-15. Land Development will review pressurized irrigation plans in more detail when specific plans are submitted with future Final Plat applications. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the requested Rezone,Development Agreement Modification,and approval of the requested Preliminary Plat application per the Findings in Section IX of this staff report. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on August 12,2021. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject Rezone, Preliminary Plat, and Development Agreement Modification requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Jane Suggs,Applicant Representative. b. In opposition: None C. Commenting: Jane Suggs d. Written testimony: 3 pieces of testimony—discussing concerns with water usage and increase of traffic when compared to estate lots to the east. e. Staff presenting application: Joseph Dodson,Associate Planner f Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. Layout of the road along the southern boundary and its intent to be fully constructed or only partially—Applicant responded and stated it will offer future connectivity to the commercial zoned property to the south and is proposed as a half-plus-twelve width. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. Is McBirney lateral being piped in its entirety on the property b. What could be anticipated to be constructed around proposed development, in terms of both residential and commercial; c. Is any portion of the project a for rent product; d. School boundary for the high school being Meridian High instead of Mountain View— high likelihood boundary will change again by the time these homes were to be Page 15 Page 188 Item#9. occupied. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstandin issue(s)for City Council: a. None C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on September 14,2021.At the public hearing.the Council moved to approve the subject Rezone.Development Agreement Modification.and Preliminary Plat requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Jane Suggs,Applicant:James Percy,neighbor: b. In opposition:None c. Commenting: Jane Suggs:James Percy: d. Written testimony:None since Commission hearing. e. Staff presenting application: Joseph Dodson,Associate Planner £ Other Staff commenting on application: Pam Orr.Meridian Fire Department:Bill Nar_v City Attorney 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Mr. Percy owns property directly to the north and supports proposed development and development in this area—he understands the traffic concerns and intends to continue working with Briar Ridge and ITD to help with this future issue. 3. Key issue(s) of discussion by City Council: a. Timing of adjacent road improvements to Meridian Road/SH 69, specifically the notable intersection of SH 69 and future W. Quartz Creek Street,the new collector street along the project north boundary: b. Clarification on any Staff concerns on timing of development and the noted commitments made by property being previously annexed: C. Are water and sewer readily available for the development• d. Design of open space and whether there was any consideration of dispersing the area more throughout the site: e. Overall traffic concerns of proposed development, specifically future residents crossing SH 69 to head north from Quartz Creek St. f. Timing of development jn correlation to development of Fire Station#7 to the southeast. per comment report from Deputy Fire Marshall Bongiorno—number of homes constructed should be limited until Station#7 is complete and operational: Ramifications of limiting number of Certificates of Occupancy versus number of building permits per construction timeline of Station#7 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. Add a DA Provision to limit the number of building permits to Phase 1,per the phasing plan,until Fire Station#7 is complete and operational. Page 16 Page 189 Item#9. VII. EXHIBITS A. Rezone Legal Descriptions and Exhibit Map DESCRIPTION FOR TN-R ZONE BRIAR RIDGE SUBDIVISION A parcel of land located in the Southeast 114 of the Northeast 1/4 and the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 36,T.31N., RAW., B.M.,City of Meridian, Ada County,Idaho being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Section 36 from which the East 1/4 corner of said Section 36 bears North 00°05'08"West,2669.88 feet;thence North 00°05'08"West, 1334.94 feet to the South 1/16 corner of said Section 36 and the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 89112'25"West, 1,322.74 feet to the Southeast 1/16 corner of said Section 36; thence North 00°10'51" East, 1,331.37 feet to the Center-East 1/16 corner of Section 36; thence on the West boundary line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 36, North 00134'27" East,20.00 feet; thence on a line parallel with and 20.00 feet North from the South boundary line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 36,South 89°21'32"East, 1,317.53 feet to the centerline of State Highway No.69,as shown on the right-of-way plans for Federal Aid Project No.STP-3782(101)on file in the office of the Idaho Transportation Department; thence on said centerline the following two(2)courses and distances: 378.93 feet along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 57,295.78 feet,a central angle of 00°22'44"and a long chord which bears South 00'06'14"West,378.93 feet; South 00°05'08" East,976.00 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 40.992 acres,more or less. End of Description. a Page 17 Page 190 Item#9. N SCALE: 1-=300' C 75 150 3CC 600 { I + N O'34'27"E --20.00' _ 589'21'32"E 1317_53=_ _ 1/4 C-E1/16 - �_- -- ---- ----� S.36 S.31 I I LN 6 I po Lo I I I I r`I m MI O M rl z1 oW Wi TN—R ZONE v Io N nl t40.992 ACRES to o U1 0 o CO O zl I Z Im NCO olco �m rn 0 o1 o o I I - I REAL POINT I I OF BEGINNIN1-�:' S1/16 SE1/16 N 89*12'25"W 1322.74' 1334.94' T.3N31 T.2N6 oNPL LAND 5��\CENS 11779 CURVE TABLE N�`7 ,,�//�zl�O CURVE LENGTH RADIUS I DELTA I CHORD BRG. CHORD DIST. C'p09TF OF \OPO� Cl 1 378.93 57295.78 O'22'44" SO'06'14"W 1 378.93 yM, MAccPN`� o DAHO' e Ci—R Rr�nn Canc nv L/;;-?l 1 I EXHIBIT DRAWING FOR JOB NO, 17-345 SUITE.WATERTOWER ST. TN—R ZONE SURVEY MERIDIAN ICY Il L SHEET NO. MERIDIAN,I0.4H083342 1208J 89G6570 BRIAR RIDGE SUBDIVISION 1 GROUP, LLC LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 AND THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 DWO,DATE OF SECTION 36,T.3N.,RAW.,B.M.,CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY,IDAHO 2/14/2021 Page 18 Page 191 Item#9. sE2l'32"e 13 7.53 N N �O II II m r o_ o m o� c 0 0 �o 0 w m 1322.74 n89°12 5"w 779 � ieI/Z.zt�. mv 2/14/2021 Scale: 1 inch=200 feet File: TN-R Zone.ndp Tract 1:40.9917 Acres,Closure:s09.3235w 0.04 ft.(11126409),Perimeter=5347 ft. 01 e128.13 n522.92 07 00.0508e 976 02 n89.1225w 1322.74 03 n00.105le 1331.37 04 n00.3427e 20 05 s89.2132e 1317.53 06 Lt r-57295.78 delta=000.2244 chord=s00.0614w 378.89 Page 19 Page 192 B. Preliminary Plat(dated: 4/7/20219/3/202 1) PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR BRIAR RIDGE SUBDIVISION Ik ----------------- I& o 91 0 0 IN -X ------- ------------- L 4 0 Z -j W z (L U) 0............ 4 W Page 20 Item#9. i v. s s„ n ' - Q i , i _ q c © js Page 21 Page 194 A - 4 ill EI gill� a. oil @i► �Il�<<g �e�fl�► �+i�■� ,^��„ , ' � ^_. I��, f ill■^ = `flu 1"li ; ' ill+,®�� ■I �: 111�� 1 I� ■ _aw Illto lum— _. ., �. �i@i� �r .rl� ,. �i:. �■�+� Ii�� iG :,ice.+a+ �� N3 gg "K Lu oft 7, ta LLL UL UL r2 OL (D ..... .... .... CL 71" CL uj Ila, 0 L d" cc. LU Page 23 Item#9. _.I „• _ � -r�- ,.,/' +N- r,. I•,'f-K, � III M .. .... i � C o y Td C; ` 1 MATCHLINE L2 w KEY MAP �x wrnn arm er. PLANT PALETTE El A ._HE. 41 JENSEI.'YaT& c�e a icnoo P-L. —11....E N LIN Page 24 Page 197 Item#9. T r MATCH.NE L�.�,�,,.--� '"`� 1TI 1 tI ��tta £r1�LL L I k 77- j Ili � a3 _ k ,� II 1 I I I I s KEY MAP PLANT Ftl-M-TTE NOTES € 0 r, — J rQ JE-90 To riU F_. µ�..z. -.. !,.0 ce ng,Inc. _ y � pu�Fne�n Pwn CAW Page 25 Page 198 Item#9. D. Open Space Exhibit(dated: 4/7/2021) 8. ---- --- ---- -- L° 2 0 0 I 1� --- -_ LOC BLOCK 3 ! ! 1t m m --_ ® LOCK 3 O ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® O Y O ._.._..____ � � i ® O i I - C 26 O eL c s I 00 40 I©O g O f O„ 00®®0(D OHO -- -' - - O O OBL OO OO ® 5 © 00911 " ��i�aOO®Gd� IOOsOOO 345L6) OD O ® O © O ® aLC X , i r ® TEL Iu �- _ - - '. - -- 0 � © ® sI ® 101 9 1 U47-1 i Page 26 Page 199 Item#9. E. Revised Phasing Plan - ------------ ----------------- ---- —__—W-UARTZ CREEK ST. 1 2 aaN L 9LCI 7 W -Il W JARVIS ST. =� W JARVIS ST. Q BLOCK 3 a 'HASE U 4 m W W HE ST. / ' l A S E 2 LOCX 3 k U O m m v W AVENTURINE ST. o W AVENTURINE ST, all ALLEY LEV A 1 <I }r I - II< W ROCK CRYSTAL 4 -ST, - W m � a W ROCK CRYSTAL ST. > � d - - _ IW 8L 8 _ IF�HIA E A _ 6 Q d W CHRYSOCOLLA ST. T ryZ_ CJ F N 8 CK 5 W.HOWLITE ST` - Page 27 Page 200 Item#9. F. Conceptual Building Elevations L mill OEM MEN MWIM , Page 28 Page 201 3 i r x Page V 3 �k., - �a a OL ILI r � �: Item#9. - l- r , - 1 I I` 4 jGt f Ip i t Page 32 Page 205 Item#9. G. Water Markup—Public Works Pmide MAMHt1NE SEE LOWER LER- WEEi PP-4 �� - water stubs o the—th I,.'PmPa� This east to estwater g I 'I t Y� line needs , obe 12" ae } '� 'r � Water w come down a a © O�' °i, ahonrsoo rmm O O ` J f PrevaJ 5u6dvision ,�--© Q3 Q 12 a w terllne slang _ he eastern _ Q ® 1 6cu tl down to southeast comer of ( N o----------- I © O O Oe s OOD ® 01 Q2 3 (IIC 4O� 9 11 ® \ O --- i 1 2 3� A 5 B -- o f.._x / - o Ili 0 g to yyy — Med oaun O z P 3ilk , w,_Noaus - r 12"Water - - - ,Linebthe -- 12'Water -:'south - tl Page 33 Page 206 Item#9. VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. Within six(6)months of the City Council granting the subject modification,the owner shall sign and obtain Council approval of the amended development agreement that includes an updated development plan per the submitted preliminary plat,as shown in Section VII.B;the amended DA shall include the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be substantially consistent with the approved plat, landscape plan, open space exhibit, and conceptual building elevations included in Section VII and the provisions contained herein. b. The submitted phasing plan shall be strictly adhered to and include a secondary access to Meridian Road/SH 69 with the first phase of development_aaa shall be revise,a as follows: the lafge open spaee lot(Lot 1,Bloek 3) shall be eenstmeted with phase 1 development. c. The Applicant shall extend the water main from E. Quartz Creek Street on the east side of Meridian Road/SH 69 and not extend water down SH 69 from E.Amity Road. d. W. Quartz Creek Street(the new collector street along the north boundary),the required multi-use pathway, and the required collector and arterial landscape buffers adjacent to W. Quartz Creek and S. Meridian Road/SH 69 shall be constructed and vegetated with the first phase of development, in accord with the revised phasing plan. e. The elevations/facades of 2-story structures that face S. Meridian Road, an entryway corridor, and W. Quartz Creek Street, a collector street, shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. f. Building permits shall only be submitted for Phase 1,per the revised phasing elan in Exhibit VILE:building permits for subsequent phases shall not be submitted until Meridian Fire Station No. 7 is complete and operational. 2. The preliminary plat included in Section VII.B, dated April 7,2021 September 3, 2021,shall be r-eN4sed as follows prior-to the City Gotmeil heafinw. is approved as submitted. a. Devise the plat to reorient abuilding lots(Lets 13 1^71 6 & 171 ^7 Week 3 .,,,,.1 0 Lots 18 25 12leek 3) the west.,n south side of the large o lot T et 1 � t o eo / , Bloek 3)to open"this eentfal open spage lot for-yisibility and ageess miffer-the !a-yottt on the nefth side of this lot to only have lots on t—h-pe.souldh sidde of the open spaee lot fieffting on W. Aventur-ifie Street,per-the analysis in Seetion V.L. b. Revise the proposed alleys between the townheme lots in Bleek 17 &Bleek 19 t minor-tir-ban leeal streets eenstrdeted a4 a miniffmm of 24 feet wide with etir-b and gutter-,no sidewalks, and Irking on either side,per AAC1 D Tequir-emefftts.. e. Add stfipiag or-other-tfaffie ealming measur-es (i.e. bulb outs)whefe the propose multi tise pathway er-esses leeal streets within the d&velopment; e0or-diflate wi Page 34 Page 207 Item#9. 3. The landscape plan included in Section VII.C, dated March 10,2021, shall be revised as follows prior to the City Getineil heafing_Einal Plat submittal: a. Revise the landscape plan to match the revised plat revisions noted in VIII n 2 above. b. Show striping or other traffic calming measures(i.e.bulb-outs)where the proposed multi-use pathway crosses local streets within the development; coordinate with Meridian Fire and ACHD as necessary. c. Prior to Final Plat submittal, add two(2)new lines of calculations in the landscape calculations table to show the linear feet of parkways and linear feet of pathways and include the required number of trees and proposed number of trees in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C. d. Any landscaping within the ITD right-of-way shall be landscaped in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.5. 4. With the Final Plat submittal submit a revised open space exhibit showing the changes to the preliminaa plat layout and change in open space area. 5. Future development shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC 11-2D-3 and UDC 11-2D-6 for the TN-R zoning district. 6. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 7. The Applicant shall comply with all ACHD conditions of approval. 8. Provide a pressurized irrigation system consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 1I- 3A-15,UDC 11-3B-6 and MCC 9-1-28. 9. Prior to the first Final Plat submittal,the Applicant shall obtain Administrative Design Review(DES) approval for the townhomes in this development. 10. Prior to signature on a final plat,the applicant shall submit a public access easement for the multi-use pathway segment along Meridian Road to the Planning Division for approval by City Council and subsequent recordation. The easement shall be a minimum of 14' in width (10' pathway and 2' shoulder on each side). 11. Upon completion of the landscape installation, a written Certificate of Completion shall be submitted to the Planning Division verifying all landscape improvements are in substantial compliance with the approved landscape plan as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14. 12. The preliminary plat approval shall become null and void if the applicant fails to either: 1) obtain the City Engineer signature on a final plat within two years of the date of the approved findings; or 2)obtain approval of a time extension as set forth in UDC 11-6B-7. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 A 12" water main is required to be extended from the Northwest corner of the subdivision to the Southeast corner. To do so,the water main in W Quartz Creek,part of S Jasper Ave,part of W Jarvis St, S Blue Quartz Ave, S Celestine Ave, and W Howlite St will need to be increased to 12" pipe. Page 35 Page 208 Item#9. 1.2 A 12" water main extension to the South property line is required near the corner of S Ametrine Way and W Holite St. 1.3 Two water main extensions to the North property line are required,one near the corner of W Quartz Creek St and S Carnelian Way and the other near the corner of S Jasper Ave and W Quartz Creek St. 1.4 A 12" water main extension to Meridian Rd is required near the corner of S Celestine Ave and W Howlite St. 1.5 A well lot is to be donated to the City from this development. 1.6 Do not install sewer services through infiltration trenches. 1.7 The geotechnical investigative report prepared by SITE Consulting LLC indicates some very specific construction considerations. The applicant shall be responsible for the adherence of these recommendations. Due to the existence of bedrock in the area,the project engineer shall show the bedrock depth and location on all applicable profile views. 1.8 A streetlight plan is required to be submitted with the Final Plat application. 1.9 A fixture streetlight installation agreement is required for a total of five Type 1 streetlights on Meridian Road. 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility,or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2"x 11"map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for Page 36 Page 209 Item#9. the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42- 1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development, and if so,how they will continue to be used, or provide record of their abandonment. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be Page 37 Page 210 Item#9. required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.oMIgublic_works.aspx?id=272. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridianci(y.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=234733&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Lty- D. SCHOOL IMPACT TABLE https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=234 722&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianC Lty- E. BOISE PROJECT BOARD OF CONTROL(BPBC) https://weblink.meridianciby.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=234547&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianC Lty- F. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO(COMPASS) https://weblink.meridianciU.org_/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=232901&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Lty- G. MERIDIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT(MPD) https://weblink.meridianciU.org_/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=231945&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ky H. PARKS DEPARTMENT-PATHWAYS https://weblink.meridianciU.org_/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=234524&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Page 38 Page 211 Item#9. Lty I. WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT(WASD) https:llweblink.meridiancity.or lWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=234296&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Lty J. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) https:llweblink.meridianciU.oLvlWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=231836&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Lty K. IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT(ITD) Technical Report- https:llweblink.meridiancity.or lWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=233231&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Lty Conditions Report- https:llweblink.meridiancity.or lWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=233230&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC hty L. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https:llweblink.meridianciU.oLvlWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=235554&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Lty IX. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing, review the application.In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment to Rezone the property from the R-4 zoning district to the TN-R zoning district with the proposed preliminary plat and site design is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, if all conditions of approval are met. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed districts, specifically the purpose statement; City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment and the request for the development complies with the regulations outlined in the requested TN-R zoning district and is consistent with the purpose statement of the requested zone and traditional neighborhood zoning districts in general. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not Page 39 Page 212 Item#9. limited to,school districts; and City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment will not result in an adverse impact on the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. Subject site is already annexed so City Council finds this finding nonapplicable. B. Preliminary Plat Findings: In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat, the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; City Council finds that the proposed plat is in substantial compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density, transportation, and pedestrian connectivity. (Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies in, Section V of this report for more information) 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; City Council finds that public services will be provided to the subject property with development. (See Section VIII of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers.) 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the development at their own cost, City Council finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; City Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development based upon comments from the public service providers(i.e.,Police,Fire,ACHD, etc). (See Section VII for more information) 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health,safety or general welfare; and, City Council is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated with the platting of this property. ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis and has offered their support of the proposed development with the proposed road layout in mind. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. City Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that exist on this site that require preserving. Page 40 Page 213 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Bright Star Care Meridian (H-2021- 0052) by Hatch Design Architecture, Located at 3336 and 3340 N. Meridian Rd. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI DIAN:-~-' AND DECISION&ORDER q In the Matter of the Request for Modification to the existing Sundance Subdivision Development Agreement and Addendum(Instrument Ws 102056126 and 106133465)to remove the subject property(Parcel A& B,ROS 8756 which is a portion of Lot 46& all of Lot 47 of Block 7, Sundance Subdivision No.5)for the purpose of entering a new agreement to allow a reduction to the existing 20-foot residential landscape buffer to construct 5,800 sq.ft. nursing and residential care facility consistent with the approved conditional use permit(H-2021-0040),by Hatch Design Architecture. Case No(s). MDA H-2021-0052 For the City Council Hearing Date of. September 14,2021 (Findings on October 5,2021) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 14, 2021, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 14,2021, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 14, 2021, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 14,2021, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR BRIGHT STAR CARE MERIDIAN-MDA H-2021-0052 - 1 - Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 14,2021,incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Development Agreement Modification is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of September 14,2021, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521,any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52,Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of September 14,2021 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR BRIGHT STAR CARE MERIDIAN-MDA H-2021-0052 -2- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 28th day of September 2021. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E.Simison 9-28-2022 Attest: Chris Johnson 9-28-2022 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 9-28-2022 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR BRIGHT STAR CARE MERIDIAN-MDA H-2021-0052 -3- EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT E IDIANn-=- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A H O HEARING 09/14/2021 Legend DATE: Proms- _zm_ - cm TO: Mayor&City Council a it FROM: Alan Tiefenbach,Associate Planner ,. ku �- 208-489-0573 f SUBJECT: H-2021-0052 Bright Star Care Meridian MDA —W-llST1 RQ E_LJSTI�{'R LOCATION: The site is located at 3336&3340 N. - Meridian Rd,in the SW '/a of Section 31, Township 4N,Range IE. . PTT I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Modification to the existing Sundance Subdivision Development Agreement and Addendum (Instrument Ws 102056126 and 106133465)to remove the subject property for the purpose of entering into a new agreement to allow a reduction to the required 20-foot residential landscape buffer to construct a 5,800 sq. ft. nursing and residential care facility consistent with approved conditional use permit(H-2021-0040),by Hatch Design Architecture. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Applicant/Representative: Jeff Hatch,Hatch Design Architecture-200 W. 36th St.,Boise, ID, 83714 B. Owner: Settler's Crossing LOC—7761 W. Riverside Dr, Ste 100,Boise, ID, 83714 III. STAFF ANALYSIS The subject property is presently two vacant lots comprising 0.43 acres and is within the Settlers Business Park(Sundance Subdivision No. 5). The subject property is within the Sundance Subdivision Development Agreement, originally recorded in 2002 and modified in 2006. On July 15, 2021,the Planning Commission approved a conditional use on the subject property to allow a 5,800 sq. ft.nursing and residential care facility. The landscape plan of this facility reflected a 10' wide buffer adjacent to the residential properties to the north. However, a requirement of the Sundance Subdivision Development Agreement is that due to the single family uses abutting the boundary of the subject property, a minimum 20-foot planting strip is required along the northern property line. Because this is a requirement of the DA, it can only be reduced through action of the Council. Consequently,the Planning Commission approved the conditional use with the condition Page 1 item#,o. EX H I BIT A that the applicant either meet the 20' residential landscape buffer requirement, or request a development agreement modification through the City Council prior to submitting a certificate of zoning compliance application. As the Sundance Subdivision Development Agreement contains several hundred residential properties as well as all the commercial properties within the Settler's Business Park, staff recommended the applicant remove the subject properties from the existing development agreement and enter into a new development specifically for the subject property. The applicant states that per the Settlers Business Park Property Owners Association,the original intent of this buffer requirement was to mitigate the impact of commercial properties on the adjacent residential.According to the applicant,this development is a residential type use,so the requirement was not meant to apply in this situation. The applicant added that fencing is provided between the subject property and the properties to the north,and trees are provided in the proposed buffer at approximately 12.5' spacing,which is almost three times the density required by 11-313-9 (requiring 35' spacing). The applicant submitted a letter of no objection from the Settlers Business Park Property Owners Association and held a neighborhood meeting on August 17,2021 of which there were no comments. Because there are no objections,the applicant is providing fencing and nearly three times as much density in the landscaping, and because of the low impacts to adjacent residential associated with a nursing and residential care facility, staff does not object to the reduction in the buffer width. Staff has reviewed the requirements of the original DA and the DA addendum. As the subject property is located internally within the Settler's Business Park and all parking,infrastructure and public improvements for the Sundance Subdivision and Settles' Business Park have already been constructed,the only pertinent requirements of the existing DA are regarding the allowed uses and the landscape buffer. IV. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends the City Council approve removing the subject property from the Sundance Subdivision Agreement and Addendum(Instrument Ws 102056126 and 106133465) and establishing a new development agreement.: 1. The property is approved to develop with a nursing and residential care facility). The applicant shall substantially comply with the site plan,landscape plan and building elevations approved with conditional use permit(H-2021-0040). 2. The applicant shall be allowed to construct a 10-foot wide landscape buffer along the northern boundary of the site as shown in Exhibit B. B. The Meridian City Council heard these items on September 14,2021. At the public hearing the Council moved to approve the subject development agreement modification request. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Jeff Hatch,Hatch Design Architecture b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: None d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Alan Tiefenbach f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None Page 2 Page 219 item#,o. EXHIBIT A 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. None Page 3 Page 220 item#,o. EXHIBIT A V. EXHIBITS A. Legal Description EXHIBIT"A" Parcel A—Description A parcel of land being a portion of Lot 47,Block 7 ofSUNDANCE SUB DIVISTON No. 5, filed in Book 98 of Plats at Pages 12523-12526,in the Office of the Ada County Recorder, located in the SW `la of Section 31,Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian,City of Mcridian,Ada County,Idaho, and as shown on Record of Survey No. 8756,filed as Instru nent Igo_110034523, heing more particularly described as follows- BEGINNING NING at the northwesterly corner of I.ot 47, Block 7 of said subdivision; thence, along the northerly line of said Lot 47, 1. S.89"0913"E., 101.48 feet; thence,leaving said northerly line, 2. 5.00°51'50"W., 88.09 feet to the southerly line of said 1.ot 47;thence,along said southerly line, 3. M89°08'10"W., 101.48 feet to the southwesterly corner of said Lot 47;thence,along the westerly line of said Lot 47, 4. N.00P51'5D"E.,88.08 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNfNG. CONTAINING: 0.205 Acres,more or less. SUBJECT TO. All Covenants,Rights, Rights-of Way and Easements of Record. rA%STT 31 Page 4 Page 221 item#,o. EX H I BIT A EXHIBIT"A" Parcel B—Description A parcel of land being a portion of Trots 46 and 47,Block 7 of SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION No. 5, filed in Book 98 of Plats at Pages 12523-12526, in the Office of the Ada County Recorder,located in the SW '/4 of Section 31,Township 4 North, Range 1 East,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho, and as shown on Record of Survey No. 8756,filed as Instrument No.110034523,being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the northwesterly corner of Lot 47,Block 7 of said subdivision;thence,along the northerly line of said Lot 47, A) S.89008'33"E., 101.48 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;thence,continuing along said northerly line, 1. S.89°08'33"E.,60.00 feet;thence, leaving said northerly line, 2. S.00051'50"W., 177.90 feet to the southerly line of said Lot 46;thence,along said southerly line, 3. N.90"00'00"W.,49.44 feet to the southwesterly corner of said Lot 46;thence,along the westerly line of said Lot 46, 4. N.00051'50"E.,90.55 feet to the southeasterly corner of said Lot 47;thence,along the southerly line of said Lot 47, 5. N.89008'10"W., 10.56 feet;thence,the southerly line of said Lot 47, 6. N.00051'50"E.,88.09 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING:0.224 Acres,more or less. SUBJECT TO. All Covenants,Rights,Rights-of Way and Easements of Record. T 7316 H:W5141%WPfiks\SURVEYIPBA PARCEL DESCRIPTIONSTARCEL B.doc �/ 4 IsIto � f OF Page 5 Page 222 item#,o. EX H I BIT A B. Site Plan(approved by Planning Commission on July 15,2021) i GENERAL NOTES SITE RECAP N ti:..exrr I i '`wo��xx■ir1e51`a'.•'n�'��.m■ e,roairt=rscr:.uexuo4 n m+s+vsrsl a ol�e; S.■ t. ��-_�,— - � '�-.f_. �—_ I. � — ■ wnm.un srera na,�ssr..:�um tt pp 5' + 74Ar p o■ur .__._ —___ mrnnwo nxnoaa� x'1196T ! _��-' �Y'-Y � �b�� L CPwMfi li.�'8l■i lrGrril _ APPLICANT INFO_ - • I �wTa r�uo-mv.r¢ icenr��nix+ia�"' .�c ecrsca� I srvns - - GWLeR rAk Li■Y[xi "; I r_5�74 I I rx� n�T3AG34 1�i; ::d�il�i - PRflP4g1} !-01°1°:w nao,oc l-0 •�i I1E51LfIQTfAL '7l :i�±qv F°•_ CeRE fACL1TY � �' u�� ]I'i,r: `•,,,,,7,7�i°'� Ay S.R"?SFFRE } an I•�I.• t� rk xw-• EKESMW i = ,�;�i• KEYNdTESny-u ewLo�ac E1d$T]NG as:.vxrs rhn�ws Arc.•..00■r`ou` T APAIW-LOT— 5 - T raw c n..�wrcoan uu� I_ Yi' err 3r.....ra rwrcarnw; I I .xw•ae�..,x,.s W— -+-'�`, h i wxasm.xmua:+:u " g� 1'yl 7 L4 fEwsnF,r, pl �r I ExISTING EXISTING �I ! ?ARKIM.`.,LOI j E e/yar�P,"ING LOT I - Li m LLLf � I I ' ;,;•;•;,; 4 APPROVAL STAMP L_T _ —_ _— —_ _— __ _—_ I wrar ro•w pow_�_— • �• —__ — ;,-,T; _ I � '�.•.'�1�'11'.1,'•.�-{dam �� ,,--r-r� r-rT� PARR7lJG LOT L �-�• +� �,,. N SITE P W 4 SITE REFERENCE PLAN ! Page 6 Page 223 ►rem#,o. EX H I BIT A C. Landscape Plan of approved Brightstar Meridian Conditional Use 3. ALL TREES THAT ARE OAMOJCfD.DE.SfROY THE MITIGATION STANDARDS PER THE CIT 4. SEE TREE MITIG4TlON NOTES FOR ADD[ff Adjacent Single Family BEGIN 6 4)END CB 1 .iR. C6 xowew�-R-e - A Area of buffer reduction L _[DENDLLJ5 I JH 777 - 7 CA 4 : - • mv.«..,, " BT EXISTING rJ ., .��."'•` ogtn'�.nFm B BUILDING •.'. ... a �. ^.` SJ EXISTING •'y:� .iM e - _ PARKING LOT �'�:!,. - 4 CA 5 6 BEGIN vM CA Py "°9"0g'�0'Y+�«•�^ _ 4 BEGIN LS SJ CA 6 END END £AF� 6 BEIG]N IT simmswti�o.s i-�1 � EXCITING I o I I BUILDING ;! EXFSTING 8 EDfI57ING PARKING LOT PARKING LOT l— , ' � I I EXISTING R 1 Page 7 — Page 224 ►rem#,o. EX H I BIT A D. Approved Elevations of Brightstar Meridian Facility HATCH DE5ioN ARCHITECTURE 1 Front (west) elevation - - 11 - rt it oo � 'fi.+-Via.:,': �•.t•�t::.. a•• s NORTH ELEVATION Rear (north) elevation facing residential (fence and landscaping will be in front of this elevation. Page 8 Page 225 item#,o. EXHIBIT A E. Existing DA language permitted. S. Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accozdar.ce -Witia City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.1 , '9. All construction ,skull conform to &Le rrquicenxent-5 of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 10, M--- dian City Ozdina,nce 1 -6 sets forth the requirentenu for Planned Developments. My conditions attached to a Final Development Plan for Played Develapmcnt projects run with the]arid and shall not lapse or be waived as the result of any subsequent change in tenancy or ownership. 11, That any proposed uses other than an office use on Lots 45, 47. 49 and 50, Block 7 shall require a CUP. The office uses are allovied under the Planned Development process and would not require a CUP if constructed in accordance with an approved CUP site plan and Plat. 12. Due to the single-family uses abutting the boundaries of Lots 45. 47 and 49, Block 7 (proposed as future office use), a mznimum 20-foot planting strip, in accozdarice with City Ordinary 12-4- i-A., is required along the property lines of these three lots. 13_ Dedicate 48-Fcct of right-of-way frorrl the c.eflterline of Ustick Road abuttirLg the parcel by means of record-ation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warrarlty d d prior to issuance of a building permit (or other regt:lred permits),whichever occurs first. Dedicate 48-feet of right-of-way From the ce-m-e lirie of Meridian Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a waz:anty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits),whichever occurs Firs-[. 15, Construct the main entrance off Ustick Road, located approximately 900-feet east of the west property lime, as propose,d. Construct the main entrance with one inbound DFVELC)PMENT AGENT(AZyO1-412) - 6 rage Y Page 226 77 C� E IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decision and Order for Request for City Council Review of the Planning Director's Determination that a Reduced 5-Foot Interior Setback Specified in UDC Table 11-213-3 Did Not Apply to a New Structure Proposed for Construction on the Property Located at 2560 S. Meridian Road, by Clark Wardle (CR-2021-0003) C� fIEN .D L4,, MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Bill Nary, City Attorney Meeting Date: September 28, 2021 Presenter: Bill Nary, City Attorney Estimated Time: .1 minutes Topic: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decision and Order for Request for City Council Review of the Planning Director's determination that a Reduced 5- foot Interior Setback Specified in UDC Table 11-213-3 did not apply to a new Structure Proposed for Construction on the Property Located at 2560 S. Meridian Road, by Clark Wardle (CR-2021- 0003) Recommended Council Action: Approve the proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decision and Order. Background: On September 21, 2021, City Council granted reconsideration for the sole purpose of adopting new Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decision and Order, to replace previous findings adopted on August 17, 2021. Page 228 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW E AND DECISION DECISION & ORDER I D A H O Date of Order: September 28, 2021 Case No.: CR-2021-0003 Applicant: Blood, LLC (Speedy Quick) In the Matter of. Request for City Council review of Director's Determination concerning the application of Table 11-2B-3 of the Unified Development Code of the City of Meridian to a storage building to be constructed at 2560 S. Meridian Road. Pursuant to testimony and evidence received regarding this matter at the public hearing before the Meridian City Council on July 6, 2021, as to this matter, the City Council enters the following findings of fact, conclusions of law, final decision, and order. A. Findings of Fact. City Council finds that: 1. City of Meridian("City") issued to Applicant a certificate of zoning compliance ("CZC") on or about May 5, 2021, to allow for the construction of a 2,500 square foot storage building ("Storage Building"), the renovation and reuse of an existing 1,700 square foot residential structure, and the construction of related improvements at 2560 S. Meridian Road, which is located in the limited office ("L-O") zoning district. 2. Table 11-2B-3 of the Unified Development Code of the City of Meridian("UDC") specifies that the interior side setback for development in the L-O zoning district shall be "1015" feet, with a footnote that states, "Minimum setback only allowed with reuse of existing residential structure." 3. Applicant interpreted this provision of UDC Table 11-2B-3 to allow the Storage Building to be constructed with a five-foot interior side setback because, in addition to constructing the Storage Building, the Applicant is reusing an existing residential structure elsewhere on the property. 4. Planning staff disagreed with Applicant's interpretation and determined that the Storage Building is subject to a ten-foot interior side setback under UDC Table 11-2B-3. Therefore, the CZC includes a condition of approval reading, "The site plan and landscape plan shall be revised to reflect the proposed storage building at the southeast portion of the property meeting the 10' side setback." 5. Applicant requested a Director's Determination regarding the interpretation of UDC Table 11-2B-3. The Director's Determination,which is incorporated herein by reference, concluded that Planning staff had correctly interpreted the interior side setback requirement: As staff mentioned in their February 25, 2021 email, the 5' setback allowance in UDC 11-2B-3 is to address the existing homes along arterials that may convert to office uses. As an example, to FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER Blood,LLC(Speedy Quick)—Case No.CR-2021-0003 Page 1 explain the intent, staff noted most of the residential structures in this area were constructed with a 5-foot setback, and if rezoned from residential to office, requiring a 10' setback would create a non- conforming structure if this exception in the UDC did not exist. This setback reduction has been interpreted correctly and does not extend to all new structures that are proposed for construction on the same property. 6. Applicant requested City Council review of the Director's Determination under UDC section 11-5A-7(A). A de novo public hearing was scheduled for this purpose on June 22, 2021, and subsequently continued to July 6, 2021. 7. City Council received testimony from Applicant, Planning staff, and the public at the public hearing on July 6, 2021. Applicant also submitted a written document to City Council explaining the basis for Applicant's interpretation of UDC Table 11-2B-3. 8. The intent of the relevant provision of UDC Table 11-2B-3 is that only existing residential structures reused for other purposes may have a five-foot interior side setback. New buildings in the L-O zoning district must have a ten-foot interior side setback. 9. City Council finds that the Storage Building, a new building in the L-O zoning district, is appropriately subject to a ten-foot interior side setback. B. Conclusions of law. City Council concludes that: 1. City Council takes judicial notice of the UDC, codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, all current zoning maps, and the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 2. The relevant criteria and standards for City Council review of the Director's Determination, as set forth in UDC section 11-5A-7, have been satisfied. 3. "There is a strong presumption favoring the validity of a governing board's zoning decisions, including its application and interpretation of its own zoning ordinance.Marcia T. Turner, L.L.C. v. City of Twin Falls, 144 Idaho 203, 208-09, 159 P.3d 840, 845-46 (2007). 4. Under UDC section 11-1-5(D)(2), "[i]f conflicts occur between different regulations of this title, or between this title and other regulations of this Code, the most restrictive regulation shall apply." 5. Given the facts set forth above, the Director's Determination properly interpreted and applied the provisions of UDC Table 11-213-3. 6. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6503, the City has acted in accordance with all applicable provisions of the Local Land Use Planning Act ("LLUPA"), codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code, in this matter. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER Blood,LLC(Speedy Quick)—Case No.CR-2021-0003 Pag_ C. Order. Pursuant to the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, City Council hereby upholds the Director's Determination.and orders that, pursuant to UDC Table 11-2B-3, new structures in the L-O zoning district shall be subject to a ten-foot interior side setback. D. Final decision. Upon approval by majority vote of the City Council, this is a final decision of the governing body of the City of Meridian. E. Judicial review. Pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-652 1(1)(d), if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code section 67-652 1(1)(a), an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may, within twenty-eight (28) days after all remedies have been exhausted, including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code section 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of right to regulatory takings analysis. Pursuant to Idaho Code sections 67-652 1(1)(d) and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. IT IS SO ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, on this 28th day of September, 2021. Robert E. Simison 9-28-2021 Mayor Attest: Chris Johnson 9-28-2021 City Clerk FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER Blood,LLC(Speedy Quick)—Case No.CR-2021-0003 Page 3 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Wells Street Assisted Living/Andorra Subdivision (H-2021-0024) by Jamie Koenig of Babcock Design, Located at 675, 715 and 955 S. Wells St. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI DIA AND DECISION&ORDER �N,-- In the Matter of the Request for Annexation of 17.5 acres of land with a TN-R zoning district, Preliminary Plat consisting of 61 building lots,and 8 common lots,and Conditional Use Permit to allow Assisted Living and Memory Care Facility; by Jamie Koenig,Babcock Design. Case No(s).H-2021-0024 For the City Council Hearing Date of: September 14,2021 (Findings on October 5, 2021) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 14, 2021, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 14,2021, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 14, 2021, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 14,2021, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(WELLS ASSISTED LIVING AND ANDORRA SUBDIVISION-FILE#H-2021-0024) - 1 - 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 14,2021,incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for annexation,zoning to TN-R,preliminary plat and conditional use is hereby DENIED per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of September 14,2021, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I- 6B-7C). Notice of Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit,when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time,the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting,the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two(2)year period. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-5B-6.G.1,the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one(1)two (2)year period. Additional time extensions up to two (2)years as FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(WELLS ASSISTED LIVING AND ANDORRA SUBDIVISION-FILE#H-2021-0024) -2- Item#12. determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11(UDC 11-513-617). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521,any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52,Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of September 14,2021, FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(WELLS ASSISTED LIVING AND ANDORRA SUBDIVISION—FILE#H-2021-0024) -3 Page 235 Item#12. EXHIBIT A September 7, 2021 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Alan Tiefenbach, Associate City Planner RE: Wells St Assisted Living AZ, PPH-2021-0024 At the August 17, 2021 City Council Meeting, the Council continued this case to September 14, 2021 for the applicant to consider feedback from the Council as follows: 1. Committing to a 55+ age-restricted community by reducing the footprint of the homes, deed restricting the homes, and/or limiting the houses to one story. 2. Providing larger rear setbacks to the existing properties in the Snorting Bull Subdivision(Woodbridge) to the west. 3. Removing the access from E. Magic View Dr. by providing another access to S. Wells St. 4. Moving the pool to a location further away from the homes. The applicant has provided revised plans. The plans increase the setbacks of all homes along the west property line to a minimum setback of 17'. The access to E. Magic View Dr. has been removed and retained for pedestrian and emergency access only and another access has been provided to S. Wells St. Lots have been extended in length so that all properties have 2 car garages and 2 car driveways. There are 21 additional guest parking spaces and 9 parking spaces have been provided for the clubhouse. This has resulted in a reduction in qualified open space from 21.5%to 20.6%. ATTACHMENTS Updated Concept Plan https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=236752&dbid=0&repo=Me ridianCity Updated Open Space Plan hgps://weblink.meridianciiy.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=236808&dbid=0&repo=Me ridianCity Page 237 Community Development Department . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102, Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-884-5533 . Fax 208-888-6854 . www.meridiancity.org item#12. Page 2 Updated Plat hgps://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=237194&dbid=0&repo=Me ridianCity Page 238 EXH I BIT A STAFF REPORT E IDIANn-=- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A H O HEARING August 17,2021 Legends DATE: ff I0Projec3 Lacafian TO: Mayor&City Council -- ------ ' i FROM: Alan Tiefenbach,Associate Planner .� 208-884-5533 - ---- SUBJECT: H-2021-0024 Wells Assisted Living and Andorra Subdivision LOCATION: Southwest corner of E. Magic View Dr. and S. Wells St. at 675, 715 & and 955 a S. Wells St. in the SE 1/4 of Section 17, Township 3N., Range 1 E. i 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant has submitted the following applications: • Annexation and zoning of 17.50 acres of land with the TN-R zoning district; • Preliminary plat for 61 building lots and 8 common lots(northern half)on 11.79 acres; • Conditional use to allow a 91-unit,three story nursing and residential care building with a footprint of 30,000 sq. ft and an 8,960 sq. foot commercial building with use to be determined at a later date(southern half); • Private streets in the gated portion of the development serving 61 residential units with two(2) gates; • Alternative Compliance to UDC 11-3F-4-4B which limits a gated development to no more than fifty(50)dwelling units,to allow 61 dwelling units. • Alternative Compliance to UDC 11-3C-4A,which requires parking spaces for all single-family detached dwellings to be located on the same lot as the use that they are intended to serve,to allow 32 of the required parking spaces to be accommodated within on-street bulb-outs. The Planning Director approves alternative compliance requests. A similar proposal was approved for the subject properties in April of 2020(Andorra Senior Living H-2019-0127). This proposal included 76 single family residences and a 3-story apartment building with 88 dwelling units.Following the Council meeting,the property owners of the parcel to the west(972 E.Wells Cir) decided they were not interested in selling the property to the applicant and the annexation and development agreement was never completed. The present development was redesigned and no longer contains the additional parcel. Page 1 Page 239 Item#12. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 17.50 Future Land Use Desi nation(s) MDR(north)and MU-N(south) Existing Land Use Single-family residential/vacant land Proposed Land Use(s) Assisted living/memory care,office and single family residential Current Zoning RUT and RI in Ada County Proposed Zoning TN-R Phasing plan(#of phases) 2 phases. 61 units of residential and nursing and residential care facility will be constructed as two separate projects at the same time,office would be built at a later phase. Number of Residential Units(type 61 single family units and 91 units in 3-story building of units) Density Gross density is 8.7 dwelling units to the acre Open Space(acres,total [%]/ Open space is required for the single-family development per buffer/qualified) the standards in UDC 11-3G.Based on an area of 11.79 acres, 1.2 acres of qualified open space(10%)is required,whereas 2.38 acres(21.5%)is proposed,double the UDC requirements. Amenities Central pathway along Five Mile Creek,green space corridor north-south through the residential development,clubhouse with fitness center and pool,outdoor open spaces with water features,pickle ball,horseshoe pits gazebos and dog park. Physical Features(waterways, Five Mile Creek bisects the property and is contained within a hazards,flood plain,hillside) 100-foot easement Neighborhood meeting date;#of Two neighborhood meetings were held in February and attendees: March of 2021 —(Approximately 45 attendees among the two meetings) History(previous approvals) AZ,PP H-2019-0127(Approved but never completed) Public Testimony As of June 30,2021,two letters have been received. One letter was received from the Woodbridge HOA President (Snorting Bull Subdivision)and Bette Monteith.Issues expressed include,traffic,density,height of houses,and the distance of the proposed homes from the existing homes. Page 2 Page 240 Item#12. B. Community Metrics Description Details Page ACHD • Staff report An updated staff report was completed with this proposal. (yes/no) • Requires ACHD No Commission Action(yes/no) • Improvements Applicant will be required to improve Magic View Drive and Wells St as 36' wide local commercial street.Wells circle is required to be constructed as a 33-foot-wide local street.Applicant will be required to construct Gentry Circle as a 33-foot street section,including cul-de-sac. Fire Service • Distance to Fire This fire station is approximately 1.9 miles from the project.If approved, Station the Fire Department can meet the response time goals. • Fire Response This development falls within the 5-minute response time(under ideal Time conditions) from the nearest fire station—Fire Station 1 and Fire Station 5. • Resource This development is closest to Fire Station#1. Current reliability is 70% Reliability from this station and does not meet the targeted goal of 80%or greater. • Risk This proposed commercial development has a risk factor of 2,in which Identification current resources would be adequate to supply service to this proposed project.Risk factors include firefighting in multi-story buildings and a large gathering of people in a single location. This entails a greater risk for the occupants as well as first responders. • Accessibility The project meets all required access,road widths and turnarounds.All private roadways and the ends of the roadways shall be signed"No parking fire lane." • Special/resource This proposed project will not require an aerial device. The closest truck needs company is 5 minutes travel time(under ideal conditions)to the proposed development,and therefore the Fire Department can meet this need in the required timeframe if a truck company is required.This fire station is approximately 1.7 miles from the project. In the event of a hazmat event,there will need to be mutual aid required for the development. In the event of a structure fire an additional truck company will be required.This will require additional time delays as a second truck company is not available in the city. _ • Water Supply Water supply for this proposed development requires 1,000 gallons per minute for one hour. The commercial area(the office building and the assisted living/memory care)will require 1,500 gallons a minute for 2 hours. (Approximate—see appendix B of the 2015 International Fire Code)The fire flow requirements may be less if the buildings are fully sprinklered. Page 3 Page 241 Item#12. Police Service • No comments Wastewater • Distance to Sewer N/A Services • Sewer Shed Five Mile Trunkshed • Estimated Project See application Sewer ERU's • WRRF Declining 14.11 Balance • Project Consistent Yes with W W Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts/Concerns • Pipe going into/out of manhole must have a min angle of 90 degrees. • Ensure that infiltration trenches are located so that sewer services do no pass through them. • Ensure that no permanent structures(trees,bushes,buildings,carports,trash receptacle walls,fences,infiltration trenches,light poles,etc.)are built within the utility easement. • Flow is committed Water • Distance to Water 0 feet Services • Pressure Zone 4 - • Estimated Project See application Water ERU's • Water Quality None Concerns • Project Consistent Yes with Water Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns The applicant will be required to connect the northwest water main to the existing water stub off of E Magic View Dr Page 4 Page 242 Item#12. C. Project Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend sift' Legend Pf�c*ct Lflcafiar 1t141 ��P�jec}Lacaion } ws'�, IU EB Sid dial CO i 1 _ Industrialmu-RG _ iLr is � ___.._ 'F' •R ' Zoning Map Planned Development Map Legend L� Legend ® ---,k -- -- F(3-F:ajeot Lc+cairr}n I JI IF cj.,Loam., - — Pafined Pares I Rc -+r -- �IJ7Y � tla R - - V2 C-G Rl I� C-C. L-O � -R-9 R-4 C Page 5 Page 243 Item#12. III.APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Representative: Jamie Koenig,Babcock Design—800 W. Main St,Boise,ID, 83702 B. Owner(s): Iterra Homes,LLC—316 E. 1400 St, St. George,UT, 84790 Bambara Opportunity Development—520 E. Taberncle St, St. George,UT, 84770 IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper Notification 6/25/2021 Radius notification mailed to properties 6/22/2021 within 300 feet Public hearing notice sign posted on site 6/29/2021 Nextdoor posting 6/22/2020 V. STAFF ANALYSIS A. Annexation&Zoning The Applicant requests annexation and zoning of 17.5 acres of land with TN-R zoning district consistent with the MU-N(Mixed Use—Neighborhood)and MDR(Medium-density Residential) Future Land Use Map(FLUM) designations in the Comprehensive Plan. A conceptual site plan and building elevations were submitted for the development showing how the property is planned to develop, included in Section V. The Applicant proposes to develop the site with 61 single family building lots, a 91-unit,three story assisted living/memory care building with a footprint of 30,000 sq. ft. and possibly a 9,000 sq. ft. office building. Within the nursing and residential care(assisted living/memory care) facility the applicant proposes a restaurant, spa, salon,multipurpose/movie theater, lounge, library, crafts, and other spaces to serve the residences of the facility. There will be studio, one and two- bedroom units. The Allowed Uses table in UDC Table 11-2D-2 for the TN-R zoning district lists single family detached as a principally permitted use,and professional services(office) and a nursing or residential care facility by conditional use, subject to specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3. Compliance with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2D-6 for the TN-R district is required, including but not limited to the maximum building height of 40 feet. The proposed annexation area is contiguous to City annexed property and is within the Area of City Impact Boundary. To ensure the site develops as proposed by the applicant, staff is recommending a development agreement as part of the annexation approval. Page 6 Page 244 Item#12. B. Future Land Use Map Designation The Future Land Use Map designates 13 acres of this property to the north as MDR, and approximately 4.5 acres of this property at the south is designated as MU-N(Mixed Use— Neighborhood). The MDR designation allows for a mix of dwelling types including single family residential, townhouses, condominiums, and apartments. Residential gross densities should range from three to eight dwelling units per acre. With the area proposed for single-family residential area to the north being approximately 13 acres in size, 61 dwelling units amounts to 4.7 du/acre. The portion of the property proposed for detached single family residences is directly adjacent to the established Snorting Bull Subdivision(also called Woodbridge)to the west. This adjacent subdivision is comprised of lots of approximately 5,500—6,500 sq. ft. in area. There are 16 existing houses along the adjacent boundary line of this subdivision and the houses are approximately 42' to 45' in width. The applicant proposes 21 houses of approximately 32' in width and lot sizes of 4,000 sq. ft. along the same abutting property line. At staff s recommendation,the applicant is "staggering"the rear setbacks of these houses from 12' to 27' to reduce a"wall effect"on the adjacent subdivision. The applicant also proposes to vary the height of the larger houses by keeping the western half of the houses adjacent to the existing residences to one story. Although the proposed lot sizes are smaller than what are in the adjacent subdivision and the houses narrower,the density as proposed is on the lower end of what could be allowed by the FLUM and impacts of height have been reduced. As the rows of houses at the east and west perimeters of this development have shallower side setbacks,this has allowed an increase of quality useable open space oriented at the center to 21.3%,whereas 10%is required. Because the portion of the property to the south is designated for MU-N, and there is existing office and commercial properties south of that and adjacent to I-84, a slightly higher transition in density from the neighboring properties is appropriate. The purpose of the MU-N designation is to assign areas where neighborhood-serving uses and dwellings are seamlessly integrated into the urban fabric. The intent is to avoid predominantly single-use developments by incorporating a variety of uses. Land uses in these areas should be primarily residential with supporting non-residential services.Non-residential uses in these areas tend to be smaller scale and provide goods or services that people typically do not travel far for (approximately one mile)and need regularly. Employment opportunities for those living in the neighborhood are encouraged. The proposal in this area includes 91 assisted and memory care units with supporting retail,restaurant and entertainment uses in an 30,000 sq. ft. footprint along with a 9,000 sq. ft. office building. The proposed development meets many of the goals of Mixed-use Neighborhood designation. The proposed 9,000 sq. ft. office building located toward the eastern-middle portion of the site (north of Five-Mile Creek)is within an area recommended for MDR,not MU-N. However,the Comprehensive Plan notes that future land use designations are not parcel specific.An adjacent abutting designation,when appropriate and approved as part of a public hearing with a land development application,may be used. It is staffs opinion that this is appropriate as the office development is part of a larger development and is suitably integrated. C. Comprehensive Plan(https:llwww.meridiancity.or /elan): Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this application and apply to the proposed use of this property(staff analysis in italics): Page 7 Page 245 Item#12. 2.01.01M-"Support active-adult or independent senior living development." The proposed development will provide housing options for seniors in close proximity to office, medical and commercial uses developed in the area. 3.02.00—"Maintain, improve, and expand the City's infrastructure to meet existing and growing demands in a timely, orderly, and logical manner." The proposed development is contiguous to the City and urban services can be provided to this development. The applicant will be responsible for the extension of the services to serve the proposed development. 6.01.01H-"Require pedestrian access connectors in all new development to link subdivisions together to promote neighborhood connectivity as part of a community pathway system." Pedestrian internal walkways are proposed throughout the development.A segment of the City's multi-use pathway is also proposed to be extended with the development. 4.05.02C—"Encourage the incorporation of creek corridors as amenities in development design." The submitted concept plan incorporates the Five Mile Creek corridor into the design of the project. 2.02.01 —"Plan for safe,attractive and well-maintained neighborhoods that have ample open space and generous amenities that provide varied lifestyle choices." The concept plan and open space exhibit as designed depicts 21.5%common open space. Open space is linked throughout the development with inter-connected walking paths for residents of the community to enjoy. 3.02.01G—"Establish and maintain levels of service for public facilities and services,including water, sewer,police,transportation, schools, fire and parks." The applicant is proposing to develop the site with single family detached, assisted living and memory care and an office building. Public Works has allocated resources to serve the development. Both Police and Fire have not expressed concerns with the proposed development. With the development of the site, a pathway segment will be extended to enhance the City pathway. Staff finds that the proposed development should have a minimal impact on the current LOS for public facilities. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in MU-N areas,per the Comprehensive Plan: ➢ "All developments should have a mix land uses." The proposed development contains a mix of uses as required(i.e. assisted living and memory care, single family residential and office). ➢ "Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 40%of the development area at densities ranging from 6 to 12 units/acre." This development proposes 91 assisted living and memory care residential units in a three story 30,000 sf ft footprint, 61 single family units, and a 9,000 sq.ft. office building. This is more than 40%of the development being residential, with a gross density of approximately 8.7 du/acre. ➢ "Non-residential buildings should be proportional to and blend in with adjacent residential buildings." The applicant has submitted conceptual elevations of all buildings. The single-family residences on the northern portion of the site are bungalow and craftsman style homes with pitched roofs, dormers, lap siding and rock to tie into the existing residential to the west. The assisted living and memory care and office building are at the southern portion of the site and will likely be developed as a separate project under a different owner. The architecture Page 8 Page 246 Item#12. proposed for these buildings is much more contemporary—flat-roofed buildings with a combination of panel, stucco, metal, exposed timber frame and overhanging balconies. This is a style that is not characteristic of the residential uses to the north. However, this is a separate project, is separated from the residential component by 5-mile creek, and there is variety of commercial architecture in and around the general vicinity. The architecture of the two proposed commercial buildings is mostly consistent with each other. Although the elevations of the assisted living and memory care building contains numerous architectural features, modulation and variation infield materials and accents, the elevation provided for the office building is simpler and might not comply with the standards of the Architectural Standards Manual(ASM). Final design will be determined at the time of CZC and design review. "Unless a structure contains a mix of both residential and office,or residential and commercial land uses, a maximum building size should be limited to a 20,000 square-foot building footprint." The largest building proposed on the site is the 3-story assisted living/memory care building which has a building footprint of 30,000 square feet. In addition to 91 residential units, the building is indicated to contain a restaurant, spa, salon, movie theater and lounge, which meets the above recommendation for a mix of uses to allow larger footprints. ➢ "Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks,plazas, outdoor gathering areas, open space, libraries, and schools that comprise a minimum of 10%of the development area are required. Outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count towards this requirement." The proposed development has multiple gathering spaces that comply with this requirement. ➢ Where the development proposes public and quasi-public uses to support the development above the minimum 5%,the developer may be eligible for additional residential densities and/or an increase to the maximum building footprint." The applicant is extending a portion of the pathway through the development for public benefit and providing open space in excess of UDC standards. Therefore, staff supports the increase in the building footprint as proposed by the applicant. D. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There are several existing structures on this site that are required to be removed prior to development of each subsequent phase. E. Proposed Use Analysis: The applicant proposes to rezone to Traditional Neighborhood Residential District(TN-R)to allow single family detached, office and nursing or residential care facility. Single family detached is a principally permitted uses;the office and nursing or residential care requires a conditional use permit,which is discussed below. The end-user of the office building is unknown at this time and will be evaluated when an end-user is identified. Allowed uses are those identified in UDC Table 11-2D-2. Since the initial submittal of the formal application,the applicant has later mentioned they were considering the possibility of multifamily rather than the assisted living/memory care facility. Staff mentioned this was a different use,would require a new application,new public noticing and would likely result in a delayed hearing date. Staff also had concerns with potential traffic impacts, Page 9 Page 247 Item#12. especially for cars that would use E. Magic View Dr as a"cut through"street to the west. The applicant subsequently expressed their desire to retain the present hearing date and to move forward with the application as was initially submitted. It is important to note the traditional neighborhood districts are the only zone districts in which multifamily is allowed by-right without a conditional use permit. Staff recommends a restriction that limits the three-story building at the south to nursing and residential care. E. Specific Use Standards UDC 11-4-3-29 lists the specific use standards for nursing or residential care facilities. Standards include requirements for occupancy, and requirements for fencing of outdoor areas accessible to patients who are memory-compromised. The concept site plan does reflect several outdoor areas associated with the nursing or residential care facility,but no specificity regarding which areas will be accessible for memory care patients. The outdoor areas should be identified and contain proper fencing at time of CZC submittal. F. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The proposed plat and subsequent development are required to comply with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2D-6 for the TN-R district. This includes setbacks continent upon whether the property is street accessed or alley accessed, a maximum building height of 40' (30' to eaves providing roof access), and landscape buffers of 5' along alleys and 8' along local streets. Street layout is primarily to be based on a grid,with block faces limited to no longer than 500' without intersecting street or alley. At least two different housing types are required, such as single-family dwellings with attached garages and alley-loaded single-family dwellings. It is anticipated that c street only access properties at the perimeter of a TN-R development. All dwelling units are required to have a minimum of 2 lights at the front of the unit. It does appear the concept plan as submitted meets most TN-R requirements, including street accessed along the perimeter. Two housing types of street accessed and alley-loaded homes are proposed, as well as assisted living and memory care. The 3-story nursing or residential care facility appears to be within the 40' height limit, although the height is not dimensioned on the conceptual elevations. A lighting plan will be required at time of CZC and design review. The block lengths along S. Shadowbrook Ln(west) and S. Andorra Ln(east)exceed 500'. Staff understands that without a complete redesign it is not feasible to meet the block length requirements at the west due to the existing residences, and putting a mid-block park in this area would probably not be well-received by the neighbors. Staff and the applicant have discussed the block length along S. Andorra Ln(east)and the applicant has agreed to provide a mid-block park and pathway connection from S. Andorra Ln to the S. Wells St pathway. Staff recommends the Council approve a waiver from 11-2D-3-A-C-1 to allow the block length as proposed at the western property boundary(S. Shadowbrook Ln). G. Access(UDC 11-3A-3): Access to this development is proposed from the adjacent local streets(E. Magic View Dr, S.Wells St. and E. Wells Circle)in accord with UDC 11-3A-3. For internal connectivity,the applicant is proposing gated private streets,alleys and drive aisles at the portion of the property desired for single family residential. UDC 11-3F-1 allows the Director to approve private streets when certain findings are satisfied. These are discussed in Section VII. ACHD responded in a staff report dated June 29,2021 that the applicant will be required to improve Magic View Dr and S. Wells St. as 36' wide local commercial streets. There is a bridge Page 10 Page 248 Item#12. scheduled to be constructed across Five Mile Creek in a future integrated five-year work plan project;the applicant will not be required to improve S. Wells St. along this section. There is existing un-named ACHD right-of-way(ROW)created with Instrument#812200 shown as E. Gentry Circle toward the middle of the property, in the location of the office building.ACHD is requiring the applicant to construct this road as well as the cul-de-sac turnaround with a minimum 50-foot radius to include curb,gutter and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk. At present,the concept plan only shows this road being constructed to a western stub at the property line. ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE UDC I1-3F-4 (Private Street Requirements) states a gated development shall have no more than 50 dwelling units. 11-3C-4 (Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements)requires parking spaces for all single-family detached,townhouse, secondary,and duplex dwellings to be located on the same lot as the use that they are intended to serve. The single family detached portion of this development proposes 61 gated lots served by private streets and alleys. The 61 units are required to provide 244 parking spaces(4 per unit,at least 2 in an enclosed garage for homes with greater than 3 bedrooms). The applicant proposes 32 of these parking spaces to be in"bulb-outs"in 6 locations along the private streets. This is because some of the houses are either lacking in size of garages or the size of driveways,which results in not all homes providing four parking spaces, although all homes provide at least two. I 1-317-4 allows the Director to approve, or recommend approval of alternative design or construction standards when the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed overall design meets or exceeds the intent of the required standards of this article and shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. Requests for alternative compliance are allowed only when one(1)or more of the following conditions exist: a. Topography, soil,vegetation, or other site conditions are such that full compliance is impossible or impractical; b. The site involves space limitations or an unusually shaped lot; c. Safety considerations make alternative compliance desirable; d. Other regulatory agencies or departments having jurisdiction are requiring design standards that conflict with the requirements of this article; e. The proposed design includes innovative design features based on"new urbanism", "neotraditional design",or other architectural and/or site designs that promote walkable and mixed-use neighborhoods; f. Additional environmental quality improvements would result from the alternative compliance. In order to grant approval for an alternative compliance application,the Director shall make three findings. These are discussed in Section IX below. G. Parking(UDC 11-3Q: As mentioned in the alternative compliance section above, the single-family residential portion of this development proposes 61 houses with 3 or more bedrooms, requiring at least 244 parking Page 11 Page 249 Item#12. spaces.All of these parking spaces are provided,although 32 of them would be provided in"bulb- outs"along the private streets(as mentioned in the Alternative Compliance section above). The 244 parking spaces do not account for the 4,320 sq. ft. clubhouse. Parking for residential clubhouses is calculated based on nonresidential standards,which is one space for every five hundred square feet of gross floor area. Based on this ratio, 9 additional parking spaces are required,whereas they have not been provided. It does appear there is additional area in and around the bulb-outs near the clubhouse to provide these spaces. Staff is recommending 9 additional spaces as a condition of approval. For a nursing and residential care facility,the parking requirement is 0.5 parking space per bed. The concept site plan indicates 102 beds,which requires 51 parking spaces. 101 parking spaces have been provided. Staff believes there would be some number of staff and an office,which has been unaccounted for. Based on a requirement for office uses(commercial) of 1 parking space per 500 sq. ft.,the additional 51 parking spaces would accommodate 25,500 sq. ft. of office space,nearly an entire floor of the 3-story building. Staff believes adequate parking has been provided for this building,but at the time of certificate of zoning compliance will request an accounting of the number of beds, as well as the square footage of the staff office. The site plan reflects an 8,960 sq. ft.,two story office building. 18 parking spaces would be required and 40 spaces are shown on the conceptual plan. H. Pathways(UDC 11-3A-8): There is an informal 10-foot wide pathway stubbed at the west boundary of the adjacent Snorting Bull Subdivision. The Meridian Pathways Plan shows a future multi-use pathway connecting to this stub. The concept plan as submitted does include a connection to this stub via a direct east—west connection from the existing western pathway stub to the detached sidewalk along S. Wells St. However,there are portions of this pathway shown to narrow to 5' in width. To be consistent with the Pathways Plan, staff recommends the entire length of pathway from the existing western stub at the adjacent subdivision to S. Wells Street be built to a finished template at 10' in width'. With the final plat submittal,the applicant should submit and obtain approval of a pedestrian pathway easement from City Council. Further,the applicant should coordinate with the applicable irrigation district and conform to any requirements of the district. The Meridian Pathways Plan shows the preferred future alignment for the multi-use pathway is along Five-Mile Creek whereas the applicant is providing the connection approximately 200 feet to the north. This is because Five-Mile Creek bisects a property to the west that is neither part of Snorting Bull Subdivision nor the subject property.As the present applicant cannot control if and when this western property develops,the connection 200 feet to the north is the alternate alignment. The applicant is also providing a second pathway connection along Five-Mile Creek(south perimeter of the office parking lot). This connection should be developed to a 10' template to the western property line to facilitate completion of the preferred creekway alignment if the western property annexes and develops. The conceptual development plan shows detached sidewalks and pathways providing designated pedestrian access between all single-family residences,the central amenity,the office building and the assisted living/memory care facility. I. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-1 7): The applicant is providing 5' detached sidewalks along all the local roads which border this property(E. Magic View Dr., S. Wells St. and E.Wells Cir) although the TN-R dimensional Page 12 Page 250 Item#12. standards only require 5' wide detached sidewalks along collector roads. 4' wide detached sidewalks are provided along all the internal private roads. J. Parkways(UDC 11-2 11-3A-17): UDC 11-2D-6 requires parkways of a minimum width of 8' and landscaped with Class II trees along all local streets. The conceptual landscape plan does indicate at least 8' of landscaping adjacent to most of the detached sidewalks running along E. Magic View Dr. S.Wells St. and Wells Cir. in most areas.At the time of final plat the landscape plan should indicate all requirements of UDC 11-2D-6 and 11-3A-17 are satisfied. L. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B and UDC 11-2D-6): Because the site is more than 5 acres in size,the applicant is subject to the landscape requirements. This includes landscape strips and parkways along all local streets(in the TN-R zone district), a minimum of 10%qualified open space and minimum landscape requirements for all common open spaces and pathways. For commercial uses(including the assisted living and memory care),there are requirements for perimeter and internal landscaping within commercial parking lots,parking islands at intervals of no less than 12 parking space intervals, and tree mitigation requirements for qualifying trees. The conceptual landscape plan does indicate landscape requirements are met, although there are a few locations where it appears the minimum 8' wide parkway strip is not met along the local streets.At the time of final plat,the applicant will need to submit a landscape plan with landscape type and quantity indicated that meets the requirements of UDC 11-2D-6 and UDC 11-3B. M. Qualified Open Space (UDC 11-3G) All residential developments over 5 acres in area are required to provide at least 10%of qualified open space. The applicant has submitted an open space exhibit. Based on an acreage of 11.79 acres, 1.18 acres of open space is required,whereas 21.5%is provided. All qualified open space meets the minimum dimensional requirements and appears to be landscaped as required per UDC 11-3G-3-E. N. Qualified Site Amenities(UDC 11-3G-3-C) One amenity is required with this development. The applicant proposes a central open space which includes a 4,320 sq. ft. clubhouse, swimming pool,hot tub,pickleball court,horseshoe pit and dog park. In several other areas of the residential development,there are large open spaces which contain picnic gazebos and an open space corridor with internal pathways running the length of the residential area north to south. Although not required,the nursing/residential care facility includes sizeable open space, an internal courtyard,bocce ball court,picnic gazebo, and community garden. The Five-Mile Creek is being preserved within a 100' wide easement. The development as proposed greatly exceeds the minimum requirements. O. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing constructed on the site is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7 and the specific use standards for nursing and residential care per 11-4-3-29. With submittal of the final plat landscape plan and the CZCs for the commercial portions,the applicant should provide details of the fencing proposed for the development to ensure it complies with UDC standards. P. Existing Easements: There are existing 10-foot wide public,utility, drainage and irrigation easements that run along the interior and exterior boundary of the three platted lots created with the Magic View Amended Plat. Prior to the final plat or the issuance of a CZC application,the applicant will be required to vacate the 10-foot wide easements along internal lines and rededicate if necessary. Page 13 Page 251 Item#12. Q. Waterways (UDC 11-3A-6): The Five Mile Creek crosses the southwest corner of this site and is proposed to remain open as an amenity for the development in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6. R. Utilities(UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is proposed in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. Street lighting is required to be installed in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. See Section VI below for Public Works comments/conditions. S. Pressurized Irrigation System(UDC 11-3A-I5): An underground pressurized irrigation(PI) system is required to be provided for each lot within the development as set forth as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. T. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC I I-3A-18. U. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): As mentioned in the Comprehensive Plan Section, conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed structures on the site as shown in Section V. Single family residents incorporate residential characteristics consistent with the adjacent residences,and the commercial building have a more contemporary appearance.All structures are required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. Submittal and approval of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review applications are required prior to submittal of building permit application(s). In order to be respectful to the existing residences and because of the visibility of the project,as a condition of approval staff is recommending the rear or side of structures facing the existing residences at Snorting Bull Subdivision or facing E. Magic View Dr. or S. Wells St shall incorporate articulation through changes in materials,color,modulation, and architectural elements (horizontal and vertical)to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines in accord with UDC 11- 3A-19 and the Meridian Design Manual. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Annexation, Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit with the requirement of a Development Agreement per the provisions and comments included in Section VIII in accord with the Findings in Section IX. The Planning Director has approved alternative compliance in accord with UDC 11-5B-5 to allow 61 gated lots, 32 of the required residential parking spaces to be provided in bulb-outs,and private streets per UDC 11-3F-5. Page 14 Page 252 Item#12. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard this item on July 15,2021. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to approve the subject conditional use,annexation,rezoning and preliminary plat request. 1. Summary of the Commission public hearing: a. In favor: Jamie Koenig,Brent Thompson b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Jamie Koenig,Brent Thompson d. Written testimony: Staff has received two letters of testimony from neighbors. e. Staff presenting application: Alan Tiefenbach f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. John Overton representing the Woodbridge HOA,expressed concerns regarding rding cut- through traffic into the Woodbridge Subdivision,why an updated traffic study was not completed,whether the single-family residences would be age-restricted,parking issues along E. Magic View Dr,height of houses, and clarification on the number of parking spaces in the development.He also discussed how the project had evolved,that it had been difficult keeping up with changing plans, and their disappointment that the previous development never got completed given the community was in favor of it. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission. a. Commission discussed phasingoproject,whether the single-family residences would become a rental product concerns about the nursing and residential care facility becoming multifamily, clarification on the number of parking spaces,whether traffic calming could be considered along E. Magic View and the applicant reaching out to the Woodbridge community prior to the Council meeting. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Commission added a requirement to the development agreement that all the properties along the western perimeter, directly adjacent to the Snorting Bull Subdivision (Woodbridge)maintain side setbacks of at least 5' (minimum 10' spacing between buildings . b. Commission added a note to the development agreement that the amenities shown on the concept plan shall be required with this development including a central open space with at least a 4,320 sq. ft. clubhouse, swimming pool,hot tub,pickleball court. horseshoe pit, dog park,and an open space corridor with internal pathways running the length of the residential area north to south. The nursing/residential care facility will include the open space as shown,an internal courtyard.bocce ball court,picnic gazebo. and community garden. b. Commission clarified that the concept plan they were approving was the one dated Julv 13,2021 presented to them at the hearing. c. Commission directed the applicant to reach out to the Snorting Bull Subdivision prior to the Council hearing. C. The Meridian Citv Council heard these items on August 17,2021 and September 14, 2021. At the public hearing,,the Council moved to DENY the subject annexation, zoning to TN-R. preliminary plat and conditional use requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing_ a. In favor: Jamie Koenig, TJ Winger,Brent Thompson b. In opposition: John Overton,Woodbridge HOA President c. Commenting: Jamie Koenig,,TJ Winger,Brent Thompson d. Written testimony: 24 letters in opposition have been received. e. Staff presenting application: Alan Tiefenbach Page 15 Page 253 Item#12. f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Traffic,parking, skepticism that it would be an age-restricted community, t of houses, ambiguity regarding the commercial building, distrust of developer and difficulty keeping up with the number of revisions proposed. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Traffic,parking,height of houses,compatibility with neighborhood how the north and south portions of the development interface,that it seemed the housing was designed as an"afterthought",how to enforce age restriction through means as one-story limitation, limiting square footages of houses, or deed restricting,whether the Woodbridge H�OA would be more supportive of a completely commercial development,and whether annexing this property is in the best interest of the City. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. None Page 16 Page 254 Item#12. VII. EXHIBITS A. Annexation Legal Description and Exhibit Map(date: 4/21/2021) WELLS STREET PROPERTY CITY OF MERUNAN ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCR I PT10N Lots 7,21,22 and a portion of Lot 6 of Amended Magic View Subdivision filed in Gaol€52 of Plats at Pages 4445 through 44-46,Ada County Records and tfiat portion of the I ands of Ada County Highway District as described in that Warranty Deed recorded under Instrument No.8235392,Aida County Records,Ior:ated in the East Half of Section 17,Township 3 North,Range 1 East,Base Meridian,CO of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho,described asfollows: i3fGINNING at the center-quarter Earner of Section 17,Township 3 North,Range 1 East,Boise Meridian, from which the north-qu arter corner of said Section 17 bears North 00°23'48" East,2,657.09 feet;Thence North 0D°23'48"East,926.76 feet along the wesi lire of the East Half of said Section 17, Thence S 80°09'03"E,413.1b feet to the most northerly angle paint in the north line of said Lot 7; Thence along the northerly line of said Lot 7,S 80°09'03"E, 312.15 feet to the northeast corner thereof; Thence 31C°49'09"W,802.30 feet along the easterly lines of said Lots 7 and 22, Then ce309°36'26" E, 35.49 feet aiong the easterly line of said Lot 22 to the nortbeast corner-of said Lot 21; Then ce309°36'26" E, 789.42 feet along the east line of said Lot 21 to thesouth east corner thereof; Thence N 89°15'33"W,373.45 feet along the south lute of said Lct 21 to the southwest corner thereof; Thence N 00°01'21"W,723.67 feet along the west line of said Lot 21 to the southerly line of said lands of Ada County Highway District; Thence N 00°01'21"W,50.00 f eet to th e north line of said lands of Ada County Highway district; Thence(N 89°57'50"W,252.88 feet along said narth line and the south iifle of said Lot 22 tathe POINT OF BEGI PIN ING,contaittirg 17.50 acres,more or less_ END DESCRIPTION J-U-13 ENGINEERS,Inc. This description was prepared by m e or under my supervision_ If any , portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of Robert L Kazarinoff,PLS,ali professional liability associated with this domment is hereby declared null and void_ 4 OF p ` Robert L.Kaaarinoff,PLS 16CA2 z' KA%6 Date 21 ARR 2021 Page 17 Page 255 Gm qz 47 •bo . J OF J, �s � l � \ §� § ¥ � , , _ 102 1f202] Page !a �7ae Item#12. B. Conceptual Site Plan(date: nti"vv/26,12021 July 13,2021) r� ' .sir F FL iG�H�� " •+� � as�sm Page 19 Page 257 Item#12. C. Preliminary Plat(date: 10/21/2021) � rI*oeae nncaTrd, � t' Lcrr lz .� �� _ JAB �+ i.�r'�• N —_ �_ '}�� _. • 'r i• n i rl c �,4I {yam f'T't a +5F s,r47 *J 'mu sr sr 8 -7 �dlrf -RC _ 4 FF .F �,M s 50 _ r F~ lysr ' f F 22 Iln.r T ■ 47M �_� _ F I q o l i4 1 d .gyp SFy �~ '�IGh' .� 1 1 F Tk F BI 1 yII. A'131 r 311 �F +e41I JFjz 7.11 3 r ,. I 'rf 4 YE ems +.ems I'J L ally{�' i11� .Y ' -in•J.Vf• 'SF 63 rt {as Ij.►r u .t�'�'_-- 'uo-+a FLOW u� R*If, q Y - �F ' �fi4rt Y r'I' , 19 � irra �r J#+I• � rhf � F i I !94 E F faun '. *f ++• ad82 aa�l 1' 1 FL r uhE fyRJ `ILLY �44+- Ab 7G' ' M.{ ). { ' T g f "��• y .t _ kdl! Inn!F WI IF - UT I 1 .agrnYy �;. L Tom) 1 ' 9Fi;4 T GOR 99 f --�-- --- --h57'�-'X" r* {5�E&'�----y- � *-I�� I . ��tE Fret 1'd I Page 20 Page 258 Item#12. D. Proposed Landscape Plan(date: 10/21/2021) SITE AMENITIES 1 CENTRALMEADOW - ---- _ - 2 PRIVACY FENCES 7 WALKING TRAIL PICNIC GAZEBO 5 5 LAWN AREA cFrvrL��+ - 1 I • - 1 I + 5 4 +: �I ALLEYA PLAN ENLARGEMENT oo O Ejr T". _ L_j T SITE AME NIT IES 1 CENTRAL MEADOW . • ALLyA - I 1�. 2 PRIVACY FENCES -- ` ] WALKING TRAIL r1_ • a PICNIC GAZEBO 5 OFF-LEASH DOG RUN er/ ! 5 PICKLE BALL COURT 2 'Jl IJI,'r 7 LAWN GAMES • CLUBHOUSE, SWIMMING POOL AND �I�ALOUT �4F.. HOTTER r - LANE(PRNA E} UPLAND STEPPE +1,.' _- f __ • I • PLANTING � f Y •• 0 - i 4 q �•_ E POOLS IDE LANE(PRIVATE) �? ®- m Page 21 Page 259 Item#12. ,� ,. _: '}' Ir. _ y T•� � ,: �� ('� �• • EPOOL5IDE LANE(VRIVATE� SITEAMENITIES 1 CENTRAL MEADOW ` 2 PRIVACY FENCES 3 WALKING TRAIL 4 PICNIC GAZEBO AND LAWN AREA 5 VEHICULAR GATE �I E 100 YEAR 2 , ! FLOO©PLAIN AND - - --_ ADDITIONAL 10'WIDE • -ALL€Y B- - ---• � BUFFER I �' rf E.GENTRY CIRCLE IjT PLAN ENLARGEMENT o, 25 so' O 1 - w � i'• � 5 - J r. ,. 4. I f- PLAN ENLARGEMENT Page 22 Page 260 Item#12. D. Open Space Exhibit(date:3,17A2021 July 13,2021) _ — -777 QM ' �J f 4 SPACE r sa i atr rwr++�ac�r C�{ Page 23 Page 261 Item#12. E. Bulb Out Exhibit(date: 5/7/2021 3 LWdM 4FMAPQUTPmI3h¢ dp LCChlI#8 OF LHIf14 CEFLU94-f Ii PAH Ii FJQ # # i f � f ra Lryi�h'A►yffF a` i I F I% { I Page 24 Page 262 F. Conceptual Elevations d, 5/7/2021 'T. �11 .r..e...� IF WELLS SMEET WELLS SMELT COTrAGES ELEVATION 01 WELLS STREET COTrAGES ELEVATION 02 ------------ LAW Page 25 Item#12. riA CONCEPT OFFICE WEST r1r.l. CONCEPT OFFICE SW TK ELEVATION CONCEF'F OFFICE EAST ELtVATION CON CEF OFFICENORIH ELEVATION Page 26 Page 264 Item#12. VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. A Development Agreement(DA)is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s)at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat, landscape plan, conceptual site plan, and conceptual building elevations in Section VII and the provisions contained herein. b. The three-story building shown at the south portion of the site may only be used for nursing and residential care. c. Any office building may only operate with the uses as specified in Table 11-2D-2. d. Applicant shall construct a segment of the City's 10-foot multi-use pathway through the development as proposed. Prior to signature on a final plat,the applicant shall obtain City Council's approval of a public pedestrian easement and record said document. e. The rear or side of structures facing the existing residences at Snorting Bull Subdivision or facing E. Magic View Dr. or S. Wells St shall incorporate articulation through changes in materials, color,modulation, and architectural elements (horizontal and vertical)to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines in accord with UDC 11-3A-19 and the Meridian Design Manual. L All residences along the western perimeter of the development, adiacent to the existing homes in Snorting Bull Subdivision(Woodbridge) shall maintain minimum side setbacks of at least 5' (a minimum spacing of 10' between buildings). g. The amenities shown on the concept plan shall be required with this development including a central open space with at least a 4,300 sq.ft. clubhouse,swimming pool, hot tub,pickleball court,horseshoe pit,dog park,and an open space corridor with internal pathways running the length of the residential area north to south.The nursing/residential care facility will include the open space as shown, an internal courtyard,bocce ball court,picnic gazebo, and community garden. 2. Prior to the City Council meeting,the applicant shall reach out to the Snorting Bull Subdivision(Woodbridge). 3. The applicant shall provide a mid-block pathway connection from S.Andorra Ln to the S. Wells St pathway which complies with the minimum requirements of UDC 11-3A-8 and 11- 3B-12. 4. Parking for the clubhouse will be provided at one(1) space for every five hundred(500) square feet of gross floor area in accord with 11-3C-6-B. 4. All structures shall comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual and the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19. An application for Design Review Page 27 Page 265 Item#12. shall be submitted concurrently with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application and approved prior to submittal of building permit applications for nursing and residential care facility or the office building. 5. Applicant shall comply with the TN-R dimensional standards set forth in UDC Table 11-2D- 6. 6. Applicant shall comply with all ACHD conditions of approval. 7. Applicant shall comply with all specific use standards for a nursing and residential care facility in accord with 11-4-3-29. 8. Comply with all bulk,use, and development standards of the applicable district listed in UDC Chapter 2 District regulations. 9. The applicant shall design and construct the multi-use pathways consistent with the location and specifications set forth in Chapter 3 of the Meridian Pathways Master Plan unless otherwise approved by the Parks Department. 10. Construct all off-street parking areas consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B- 5I, 11-313-8C, and Chapter 3 Article C. 11 Preserve any existing trees on the subject property that are four-inch caliper or greater; or mitigate for the loss of such trees as set forth in UDC 11-3B-IOC. 12. Private streets shall be designed and constructed in accord with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3F-4. With the submittal of a final plat application,the applicant or owner shall provide documentation of a binding contract that establishes the party or parties responsible for the repair and maintenance of the private street, including regulations for the funding thereof. 11-3F-3. 13. All common open space and site amenities shall be maintained by an owner's association as set forth in UDC 11-3G-3F1. 14. The Director(at the applicant's request) approved alternative compliance in accord with UDC 11-5B-5 to allow the following: a. 61 gated lots whereas UDC 11-3F-4 limits developments to 50 lots; b. Allow 32 required parking spaces to be provided in bulb-outs whereas UDC 11-3C-4 requires parking spaces for all single-family detached dwellings to be located on the same lot as the use that they are intended to serve. Additional parking is required for the clubhouse. 15. The Applicant shall have a maximum of two(2)years to commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval listed above. If the use has not begun within two(2) years of approval, a new conditional use permit must be obtained prior to operation or a time extension must be requested in accord with UDC 11-5B-6F. 16. The(preliminary plat approval shall become null and void if the applicant fails to either 1) obtain the City Engineer signature on a final plat within two years [add date]; or 2) obtain approval of a time extension as set forth in UDC 11-613-7. Page 28 Page 266 Item#12. B. PUBLIC WORKS A. SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: 1. A streetlight plan must be included with the final plat application and/or building permit application and must comply with section 6 of the City's Design Standard. 2. A portion of this project lies within the Meridian Floodplain and Floodway Overlay District. Prior to any development occurring in the Overlay District a floodplain permit application, including hydraulic and hydrologic analysis is required to be completed and submitted to the City and approved by the Floodplain Administrator per MCC 10-6. Development in the floodway must meet either no-rise conditions or go through the CLOMR/LOMR process with FEMA to modify the maps. 3. Sewer mains through a manhole must have a minimum angle of 90 degrees. 5. Sewer service lines should not be located through infiltration trenches. 6. All water and sewer mains,water meters,and fire lines to the jurisdictional valve must be placed within public right of way or a City utility easement of 20 foot wide per utility and be free from all encroachments including but not limited to buildings, carports, streetlights, infiltration trenches,trees, fences, etc. 7. The water main in the northwest portion of the development must be connected to the existing water stub off E Magic View Dr. 8. A geotechnical must be included with the final plat application and/or building permit application. B. General Conditions of Approval 1. Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 3. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x 11"map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this Page 29 Page 267 Item#12. document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 4. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 9-1-28.C). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 5. All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 6. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42- 1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 7. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development, and if so,how they will continue to be used, or provide record of their abandonment. 8. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 9. Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits. 10. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. 11. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 12. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 13. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 14. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 15. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 16. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. Page 30 Page 268 Item#12. 17. The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 18. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 19. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 20. A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. 21. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 22. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond.Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=229654&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianCity D. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https://weblink.meridianciU.oL-glWebLink/DocView.aspx?id=229625&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianCiV E. BOISE PROJECT BOARD OF CONTROL https://weblink.meridiancily.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=229849&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCi4y F. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY https://weblink.meridiancily.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=230177&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianCityy G. NMID https://weblink.meridianciU.oL-glWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=230614&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiV Page 31 Page 269 Item#12. H. COMPASS https://weblink meridiancioy.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=230801&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCioX I. WEST ADA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT https://weblink.meridianciU.oL-glWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=232144&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiV IX. FINDINGS I. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-511-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; Council finds that the Applicant's request to annex and develop the subject 17.5-acre property with TN-R zoning is not consistent with the associated MU-N and MDR FL UM designations for this property as the Council believed the project did not interface well with surrounding properties, seemed disconnected and was not the highest and best use of the property. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; Council did not find the proposed map amendment and development complies with the purpose statements of the traditional neighborhood districts in that it was unclear whether age-restriction could be enforced and would not provide for a range of housing needs for the community consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; Council finds the proposed map amendment would be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare of the adjacent community as the council was not confident this project would be available only to those over 55 years old, and the traffic, height of houses and lack of interface would not be compatible with adjacent existing and future residential and commercial uses in the area. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and Council finds City services are available to be provided to this development. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. Due to impacts related to traffic and parking, height of housing, whether the single family residential as proposed is the best use in this area, and lack of interface with the adjacent community as well as the different portions of the property, Council finds the proposed annexation is not in the best interest of the City. Page 32 Page 270 Item#12. B. Preliminary Plat(UDC 11-613-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision- making body shall make the following findings: (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005,eff. 9-15-2005) 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; (Ord. 08-1372, 7-8-2008, eff. 7-8-2008) Council finds the proposed plat is not generally in conformance with the UDC due to land use, density, and transportation. 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; Council finds public services can be made available to the subject property and will be adequate to accommodate the proposed development. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; Council finds the proposed plat is in substantial conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's CIP. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and As mentioned above, due to impacts related to traffic and parking, height of housing, whether the single family residential as proposed is the best use in this area, lack of integration with the surrounding neighborhood, lack of confidence that the development would be predominantly occupied by those 55 years of age and over, and lack of interface with the adjacent community as well as the different portions of the property, Council finds the proposed development would be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30- 2005, eff. 9-15-2005) Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that need to be preserved with this development. C. Conditional Use Permit(Nursing and Residential Care Facility) The Council shall base its determination on the conditional use permit request upon the following: 1. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located. Council finds the site is large enough to accommodate the nursing and residential care use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations of the TN-R district. The concept plan and landscape plan show all parking, setback, and landscaping requirements are met, and additional useable open space and amenities are provided whereas they are not required. Page 33 Page 271 Item#12. 2. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accord with the requirements of this title. Council finds the proposed nursing and residential care facility and potentially the commercial building will be harmonious with the Comprehensive Plan in that it would have provided alternative housing options that are close to existing commercial and retail services for older residents and needed commercial uses in a mixed-use area. 3. That the design, construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area. Council finds the design, construction, and operation of the nursing and residential care facility should be compatible with the adjacent and future commercial uses and the future commercial uses nearby and would not adversely change the essential character of the same area. 4. That the proposed use,if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed,will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. Council finds the proposed nursing and residential care facility and the potential commercial building should not adversely affect other properties in the vicinity although concerns with height were expressed. 5. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, schools,parks,police and fire protection, drainage structures,refuse disposal, water, and sewer. Police and Fire have responded they can serve the facility and did not express concerns. Public Works has not expressed concerns other than the conditions of approval listed in Section VIII above. The nursing and residential care facility is not intended to generate any demand for school services. The commercial building will be reviewed when an end user is identified. The applicant will be required to comply with all ACHD conditions of approval. 6. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Council finds the proposed use should not create any additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. 7. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes,materials,equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons,property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic,noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. Although traffic may increase very slightly in this area due to the proposed use, Council finds the proposed nursing and residential care should not be detrimental to the general welfare. 8. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) Five-Mile Creek, north of the facility, is intended to be preserved as a natural amenity. Council is unaware of any other natural, scenic or historic features in this area. Page 34 Page 272 Item#12. D. Private Streets(UDC 11-3F-5): In order to approve the application,the Director shall find the following: A. The design of the private street meets the requirements of this article; The private streets meet the design requirements of not connecting to an arterial street, allowing sufficient maneuvering for emergency vehicles, and meeting the minimum width of 27 feet. In addition, the design does incorporate central houses oriented on a common mew through the site design as listed in the intent of this section. The proposal exceeds the limitation of no more than 50 units being served by a gated development. The Director has approved Alternative Compliance to allow 61 lots. B. Granting approval of the private street would not cause damage, hazard, or nuisance, or other detriment to persons,property, or uses in the vicinity. The fire district and police have not expressed concerns in regard to the private streets and gated lots. The Director has determined granting approval of the private streets would not cause damage, hazard, or nuisance, or other detriment to persons,property, or uses in the vicinity. C. The use and location of the private street shall not conflict with the comprehensive plan and/or the regional transportation plan. Proposing private streets with an integrated pathway system, clustering of houses around common mews, and a central greenspace corridor complies with Comprehensive Plan policies such as requiring new residential neighborhoods to provide complete streets, developing a connected, comfortable, and comprehensive network of multi purpose pathways, ensuring safe routes and access, encouraging safe,physical activity for pedestrians and bicyclists, and fostering a walkable and bikeable community and providing necessary infrastructure. D. The proposed residential development(if applicable)is a mew or gated development. The proposed development is a gated development that is centered around common mews. It exceeds the provisions of UDC 11-3F-4.b which limits gated developments to no more than 50 dwelling units, but the Director has approved Alternative Compliance to allow 61 lots due to its clustering, significant open space and amenities, and integrated pathway system. E. ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE As required by UDC 11-3F-4,the Planning Director has granted alternative compliance from the private street requirements of UDC 11-3F-4 and parking requirements of 11-3C-4 with the following findings: 1. Strict adherence or application of the requirements are not feasible; or Although it is feasible to restrict the number ofgated lots to 50 and provide all required parking for each single-family residence on site, the development is intended to be a walkable neighborhood with homes clustered around an abundance of central open space and amenities. Because the houses are clustered around greenspace and pathway connections (making the project more walkable), staff is supportive of the additional 11 gated lots. Staff also supports the "bulb-out"parking alternative, as requiring longer driveways (or garages) would result in loss of at least some of the central open space or amenities (or a complete re-design). 2. The alternative compliance provides an equal or superior means for meeting the requirements; and Page 35 Page 273 Item#12. In addition to the main central amenity (the clubhouse), the homes in this development are oriented around an approximately 75' wide green space corridor that bisects the property north-south, and a 6'pathway providing pedestrian access from E. Magic View Dr. to the 5 Mile Creekpathway to the south as well as multiple connections to S. Wells St at the east. Per the common open space and site amenity requirements of UDC 11-3G, at 11.79 acres, this development is only required to provide I amenity and 1.18 acres of qualified open space. The open space exhibit provided reflects 21.5% qualified open space (2.4 acres), with amenities including a central open space with a clubhouse, pool,fitness center, pickleball court and picnic structure, and dog park. There are also numerous pathways throughout the development, and at least 3 other 50'x 100'grassy areas (with gazebos). 3. The alternative means will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or impair the intended uses and character of surrounding properties. As the fire department and police department have not expressed issues with the number of gated lots, and the required number ofparking is provided near the single-family residences in bulb-outs along the private roads, the Director finds this alternative compliance provides an equal or superior means for meeting the requirements and will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or impair the intended uses and character of surrounding properties. Page 36 Page 274 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approval of Fiscal Year 2022 Purchase Order to Ferguson Enterprises for Water Meters and Related Equipment for the Not-to-Exceed Amount of$1,373,458.00 C� fIEN .D L4,, MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Sandra Ramirez, Buyer Procurement Div. Meeting Date: September 28, 2021 Presenter: N/A Estimated Time: 0.00 Topic: Approval of FY22 Purchase Order Recommended Council Action: Approval of Purchase Order to Ferguson Enterprises for FY22 Water Meters and Related Equipment for the Not-to-Exceed amount of$1,373,458.00. Background: This purchase is in conjunction with the current Sole Source with Ferguson Enterprises. Page 276 77 C� E IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Cooperative Agreement Between the City of Meridian and Valley Regional Transit for Fiscal Year 2022 Public Transportation Financial Contribution C� fIEN .D L4,, MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Consent Agenda Item on the City Council Agenda From: Miranda Carson, Coordination Planner Meeting Date: September 28, 2021 Topic: Valley Regional Transit FY22 Cooperative Agreement Attached is the FY 2022 Cooperative Agreement between Valley Regional Transit(VRT) and the City of Meridian. Due to the delay in the Route 30 and the unknown date for the implementation of that route, some slight changes have been made from the FY 2021 agreement. • A "Do Not Exceed" amount was set at $575,647. This is based on the City Council approved budget and estimated cost of VRT FY22 services including 9 months of service on Route 30. • The payment schedule was changed from annually to quarterly to account for the prorated service costs of Route 30 once it begins. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTION THIS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into this 1st day of October 2021 by and between VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT, a regional public transportation authority authorized under Chapter 21, Title 40, Idaho Code ("Authority"), and the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized, existing and authorized under Chapter 1, Title 50, Idaho Code ("City") RECITALS a. Authority is the regional public transportation authority created to serve Ada and Canyon Counties, pursuant to Chapter 21, Title 40, Idaho Code, and as a result of November 3, 1998 public referendum. Authority provides publicly funded or publicly subsidized transportation services and programs in Ada and Canyon counties. b. City is a municipal corporation authorized under Chapter 1, Title 50, Idaho Code. C. Idaho Code § 40-2109(7) provides that Authority may enter into cooperative agreements with the state, other authorities, counties, cities and highway districts under the provisions of Idaho Code § 67-2328, which expressly authorizes public agencies to enter into agreements with one another for cooperative action for purposes within the power, privilege, or authority of said agencies. d. Idaho Code § 40-2110 provides that counties, cities, highway districts and other governmental entities in the region may enter into cooperative agreements with the regional public transportation authority in order to contribute funds from any source in recognition of costs of the authority. e. Authority develops funding requeststhrough an approved cost allocation methodology. There are four categories involved in generating the initial funding request: general assessments, service and capital contributions, and special assessments. f. Authority has budgeted the not to exceed amount of $575,647 for City to contribute to support services, capital and regional overhead expenses. City has budgeted the same not to exceed amount representing the City's fair share of support for services, capital, and regional overhead, as set forth in Exhibit 1. g. Authority generally follows the allocation methodology to designate how City contributions are used. However, Authority may leverage City contributions as local match to optimize utilization of both local and federal sources of funding to ensure the most effective use of all revenue sources. Page 1 of 6 AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of foregoing recitals, which are made a part of this Agreement and not mere recitals, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, it is mutually agreed as follows: Section 1. Term This Agreement shall be in effect from the 1st day of October 2021, and will terminate on the 30th day of September 2022, unless earlier terminated pursuant the mutual written agreement of the parties hereto. Section 2. Purpose The purpose of this Agreement is: (a) For City to pay the not to exceed amount of $575,647 to Authority for Fiscal Year 2022 expenses pertaining to services, capital, and regional overhead required to support the regional transportation services within the City's jurisdiction, as set forth in Exhibit 1. (b) For Authority to use City's contribution for service, capital, and regional overhead expenses included in the annual FY2022 budget to support services within City's jurisdiction. (c) For Authority to leverage City's contribution with matching federal funding to optimize all revenue sources available for operations, capital, and regional overhead. Section 3. Compliance Authority, in using said City's contribution shall comply with all conditions required by applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, and shall maintain, in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices and principles, records and books of account regarding said assessments and operating costs. Section 4. Payment (a) City shall pay its general assessment, special assessment and capital assessment of $250,395 within 30 days of invoice; service assessment of $174,959 in four quarterly payments and pro rata service of $150,293 in quarterly pro-rated payments once service starts as shown in the payment schedule in Exhibit 1. (b) Authority shall provide City a quarterly status report on capital or other special projects. (c) Payment shall be made directly to Authority at the following address, unless City is notified in writing by Authority of a new address: Valley Regional Transit 700 NE 2nd St Suite 100 Meridian, Idaho 83642 (d) City's address, for the purpose of invoice, notice or correspondence, unless Authority is notified in writing by City of a new address, is as follows: City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Meridian, Idaho 83642 Page 2 of 6 Section 5. Contact Information (a) Authority point of contact for this agreement is: Jason Jedry, Controller, Jedry@valleyregionaltransit.org, 208.258.2709 (b) City point of contact for this agreement is: Miranda Carson, Comprehensive Associate Coordination Planner, mcarson@meridiancity.org Section 6. Miscellaneous (a) Each party hereto represents and warrants that each person executing this Agreement on behalf of such party is, at the time of such execution, duly authorized to do so by such party's governing body, and is fully vested with the authority to bind such party in all respects. (b) If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the remainder shall be construed to conform to the intent of the parties, and shall survive the severed provisions. (c) Except as provided otherwise herein, this Agreement and any attachments hereto constitute the entire Agreement between Authority and City concerning the subject matter hereof. The provisions of this Agreement shall be construed as a whole and not strictly for or against any party. (d) The captions and headings in this Agreement are for reference only and shall not be deemed to define or limit the scope or intent of any of the terms, covenants, conditions or agreements contained herein. (e) This Agreement is not intended to create, nor shall it in any way be interpreted or construed to create, any third party beneficiary rights in any person not a party hereto. (f) This Agreement shall be binding on the parties hereto, and their successors and assigns. Section 7. Indemnification To the extent permissible by law,Authority shall indemnify, defend, protect and hold harmless City, and it's officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, suits, claims, judgments, fines or demands arising by reason of injury or death of any person or damage to any property, including all reasonable costs for investigation and defense thereof(including but not limited to attorney fees, court costs, and expert fees), of any nature whatsoever (collectively, "Claims") arising out of or incident to this Agreement, and any renewal or extension thereof, and arising out of or caused by the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of Authority, it's officers, agents and employees, regardless of where the injury, death, or damage may occur, except to the extent any such Claims arise out of or are caused by the negligent or intentional act or omission of City or its officers, agents and employees. City shall give to Authority reasonable notice of any such Claims. Authority shall notify City of the counsel to be used in carrying out its obligations hereunder. City must state any reasonable objection that it may have regarding the use of said counsel. The provisions of this section shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive the expiration or any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement, and any renewal or extension thereof. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the foregoing, City's right to indemnification pursuant to the foregoing shall be limited to indemnification for such Page 3 of 6 Claims for which City incurs actual liability or expense. The foregoing indemnification includes, without limitation, any Claim arising out of or caused by the noncompliance of any services, programs, or activities provided by Authority under this Agreement with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes, regulations, and requirements, including, but not limited to, the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the foregoing, (i) no employee or officer of Authority shall be personally liable to City under this Agreement, (ii) with respect to third party Claims, both Authority and City expressly reserve any and all of the privileges and immunities available to them, if any, under Idaho law, and (iii) the agreement of Authority to hold harmless or indemnify City shall be limited to, and be payable only from, Authority's available insurance or self-insurance coverage for liability assumed by contract available as a part of its general liability insurance program." EXECUTED and effective as of the date first above written. Valley Regional Transit: City of Meridian: C , 6ej, 1 Kelli Badesheim Robert E. Simison 9-28-2022 Executive Director Mayor Page 4 of 6 EXHIBIT 1 FY 2022 CITY OF MERIDIAN SERVICE AND CONTRIBUTION DESCRIPTION Pursuant to the FY 2022 Cooperative Agreement between Valley Regional Transit (VRT) and the City of Meridian for Public Transportation Financial Contribution, this exhibit outlines the public transportation activities in the four categories used to generate the contribution request. General Assessment: Supports regional planning efforts such as service expansion or revisions to improve transit connections and regional operations such as the regional customer service call center and regional transit Information Technology. In accordance with VRT's local cost allocation methodology, these costs are divided by each jurisdictions share of the regional population. Service Assessment: Meridian is served by routes 40 and 42 which run Monday - Friday and connect Meridian to both Boise and Nampa/Caldwell. VRT also plans to implement route 30 Pine which would operate entirely within Meridian and connect Ten Mile Crossing to downtown Meridian and Kleiner Park. Service will run Monday - Friday during the commute period. VRT's cost allocation methodology distributes the costs of service proportionately to the miles travelled in each jurisdiction served. Approximately 21% of routes 40 and 42 operate within the City of Meridian. Meridian's service contribution for routes 40 and 42 was based on 20.56% of the combined intercountry miles serving Meridian. Due to the Delta COVID variant and the resurgence of cases, VRT has delayed the start of the 30 Pine until ridership recovers. To account for this VRT removed all variable costs related the 30 Pine from the service contribution. Once a date certain is set for the service to start, a prorated portion of the variable costs will be added to the service request. Capital Assessment: Supports the maintenance or purchase of physical infrastructure or assets. The cost allocation model distributes general capital costs by where the service is provided. Meridian's capital contribution request for FY2022 is based on Meridian's share of the transit service provided. Special Assessment: Supports specific activities, projects or programs requested by the City of Meridian. In FY2022 the City of Meridian special assessments go to support the operations of Harvest Transit, Rides2Wellness and to continue the Meridian Veteran's Shuttle service. Harvest Transit provides free transportation for seniors, persons with disabilities, and veterans from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. Monday through Saturday within a designated service area in Meridian. The budgeted annual hours of service for Harvest Transit are 6,088. Rides2Wellness provides free transportation to eligible riders to medical appointments at participating clinics. Costs for this program are assessed on a per ride basis. The budgeted annual rides for Rides2Wellness is 13,297. The Federal Transit Administration provides a 50% match for local contributions to this program. Local contributions to this program come from St. Luke's, St. Alphonsus and the City of Meridian. Page 5 of 6 Meridian Veterans Shuttle provides free transportation for Meridian veterans Monday Friday from 7:00am to 5:30pm between Meridian and the Boise Veterans Administration Medical Center. Payment Schedule General Special Capital Known Pro Rata Assessment Assessment Assessment Service Service Assessment-, lnvestment2 Qtr. 1 $67,526 $170,000 $12,869 $43,739.75 TBD Qtr. 2 $43,739.75 TBD Qtr. 3 $43,739.75 TBD Qtr. 4 $43,739.75 TBD Total $67,526 $170,000 $12,869 $174,959 Up to $150,293 1 All fixed costs for planned services on the 40, 42 and 30. All variable costs for the 40 and 42. Excludes all variable costs for the 30 Pine. 2Variable costs for the 30 Pine will be invoiced on a pro rats basis calculated by the total annual variable costs multiplied by% of the annual service provided, invoiced quarterly beginning as soon as the service start date is fixed. Page 6 of 6 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Market Labor Fee Contract Amendment for Fiscal Year 2022 Between City of Meridian and Republic Services of Idaho for Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services MARKET LABOR FEE CONTRACT AMENDMENT FY22 AMENDED THIS Amendment to Paragraph 21 of the Franchise Agreement to Perform Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services ("AMENDMENT"), is made and entered into this 28th day of September 2021, by and between CITY OF MERIDIAN, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, hereafter called "CITY", and Allied Waste Services of North America, LLC,DBA REPUBLIC SERVICES of Idaho,hereinafter called"REPUBLIC SERVICES",whose current address is: 11101 W. Executive Dr. Boise, ID 83713. 1. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, REPUBLIC SERVICES performs all services pertaining to solid waste collection and disposal of the CITY'S solid waste pursuant to the Franchise Agreement; and 1.2 WHEREAS, due to the global pandemic in 2020 and continuing into 2021 the labor market has been compromised for regular full-time employees; and 1.3 WHEREAS,REPUBLIC SERVICES has an on-going need to provide services to the CITY to fulfill its obligations under the Franchise Agreement; and 1.4 WHEREAS,a one time need for wage adjustment is necessary to attract and retain workers for REPUBLIC SERVICES; and 1.5 WHEREAS,the CITY will accept this one-time labor adjustment to be incorporated into the rates charged for FY22 only, in addition to the annual CPI adjustment as agreed to in the Franchise Agreement; and 1.6 WHEREAS,the CITY further agrees that this rate, with this additional one-time labor adjustment shall be the rate for FY22, but shall not be added to FY23 base rate until reviewed in 2022 by the City to determine if this cost is to be absorbed into the base rate of services and subject to the annual CPI Adjustment; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 3. DEFINITIONS: a. Fiscal Year("FY")—This term is defined for purposes of this AMENDMENT as the period beginning October 1, 2021 and ending September 30,2022. 4. AMENDMENT to PARAGRAPH 21 of the FRANCHISE AGREEMENT: the rate for FY22 shall be the base rate as contemplated in Paragraph 21.1 One-time Labor Adjust Cost Contract Amendment - 2021 1 5. PUBLIC NOTICE AND HEARING PROVISIONS: The parties agree that the rates for FY22, which is the subject of this AMENDMENT, is subject to compliance with the notice and hearing provisions of Idaho Code 63-131IA. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date for the Market Labor Fee is predicated upon Council's approval of the fee following public hearing and execution by the parties of this AMENDMENT with the effective date established by Council to begin October 1, 2021 or as soon thereafter as practicable. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as herein above provided. Dated this 28th day of September 2021 Mayor Robert E. Simison 9-28-2021 ATTEST: Chris Johnson, City Clerk 9-28-2021 Dated this Z-v day off2� -�—Y _ 52021. Ryan Lawler Northwest Area Nesident, Republic Services One-time Labor Adjust Cost Contract Amendment- 2021 2 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Recycling Processing Fee Contract Amendment Fiscal Year 2022 Between City of Meridian and Republic Services of Idaho for Solid Waste Collection Services RECYCLING PROCESSING FEE CONTRACT AMENDMENT FY22 THIS Amendment to Paragraph 21 of the Franchise Agreement to Perform Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services ("AMENDMENT"), is made and entered into this 7`h day of September 2021,by and between CITY OF MERIDIAN, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho,hereafter called "CITY", and Allied Waste Services of North America, LLC, DBA Republic Services of Idaho, hereinafter called "REPUBLIC SERVICES",whose current address is: 11101 W. Executive Dr. Boise, ID 83713. 1. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, REPUBLIC SERVICES performs all services pertaining to solid waste collection and disposal of the CITY'S solid waste pursuant to the Franchise Agreement; and 1.2 WHEREAS,REPUBLIC SERVICES is separately contracted to deliver the CITY's collected curbside recyclables to a third-party vendor, Western Recycling; and 1.3 WHEREAS, REPUBLIC SERVICES has heretofore paid for the monthly net cost of recycling processing charges related to Meridian's recycling program pursuant to contractual agreement with both the CITY and with Western Recycling; and 1.4 WHEREAS, the CITY has been advised that as of July 281h 2021, REPUBLIC SERVICES has sustained the net recycling processing cost of-$315,404.70 for the period of July 2020 through June 2021 for Meridian's recycling program; and 1.5 WHEREAS, the parties agree that due to sustained depressed market conditions resulting from China's severe contamination restrictions on recyclables and banned recyclable materials, commodity prices are not predicted to offset rising recycling processing costs for the foreseeable future; and 1.6 WHEREAS, REPUBLIC SERVICES has advised the CITY that effective September 30, 2019 and on-going since that date, it will no longer be economically viable to deliver the City's recyclable materials to the third-party processor, Western Recycling, for purposes of recycling due to the increased monthly net cost of recycling processing charges, which result in a net loss to REPUBLIC SERVICES; and 1.7 WHEREAS,the CITY desires to continue the Meridian Recycling Program because of its beneficial diversion of materials from the landfill; and 1.8 WHEREAS,the CITY does not believe the cost of recycling has reached a prohibitive level where the costs outweigh the benefits, but that it is cognizant that may not always be the case. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: Recycling Processing Fee Contract Amendment-2021 1 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 3. DEFINITIONS: a. Fiscal Year("FY")—This term is defined for purposes of this AMENDMENT as the period beginning October 1, 2021 and ending September 30, 2022. b. Commingled Recyclable Material--This term is defined for purposes of this AMENDMENT to include: tin, aluminum,plastics#1 and#2, newspaper, cardboard, mixed paper, and Hefty Energy Bags recoverable materials. c.Net Cost of Recycling Processing Charges- This term is defined for purposes of this AMENDMENT as the third-party vendor charge to process(sort, bale, and ship, sell at market) Meridian's commingled recyclables minus the rebate provided by Western Recycling from its materials commodity sales. 4. AMENDMENT to PARAGRAPH 21 of the FRANCHISE AGREEMENT: 21.5 RECYCLING PROCESSING FEE: Subject to the provisions set forth in Paragraph 6 of this AMENDMENT, for the period beginning October 1, 2021and ending September 30, 2022 ("FY22"): 21.5.1 REPUBLIC SERVICES will receive the following: o Residential Accounts: $1.03 per residential household per month o Commercial Accounts: $1.09 per yard 21.5.2 CPI-INDEX - The recycling processing fee is not subject to the annual CPI rate calculation. 21.5.3 FRANCHISE FEE- The City will receive the 6%franchise fee on all commercial and residential rate components, including the recycling processing fee as reflected in Republic Services' 2021- 2022 rate model request. 21.5.4 REPUBLIC SERVICES agrees to pay for the effective period of this AMENDMENT the net cost of recycling processing charges in excess of the amount received as set forth in 21.5.1 above. 21.5.5 REPUBLIC SERVICES agrees to provide the CITY a year end reconciliation report of its third-party vendor recycling processing charges, including an audit of the estimated increase for the period October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022. This reconciliation shall be provided to City Council within 120 days of September 30, 2022. Recycling Processing Fee Contract Amendment- 2021 2 2I.5.6 REPUBLIC SERVICES will reimburse the CITY of any over charge by Western Recycling for the effective period of this AMENDMENT within 120 days of September 30, 2022. 21.5.7 REPUBLIC SERVICES commits to deliver Meridian's residential and commercial recycling materials to Western Recycling. 21.5.8 REPUBLIC SERVICES shall immediately notify City Council to seek direction if REPUBLIC SERVICES becomes aware that the third-party vendor is not processing (sorting, baling, shipping, selling at market) all of the individual materials which comprise Meridian's commingled recyclable material. 5. Nothing contained in this AMENDMENT shall change the agreement between the parties that when there exists recycling net profit that it be split 80/20 with 80%returned to the CITY by REPUBLIC SERVICES for the benefit of the Meridian Community Recycling Fund. 6. PUBLIC NOTICE AND HEARING PROVISIONS: The parties agree that the recycling processing fee which is the subject of this AMENDMENT is subject to compliance with the notice and hearing provisions of Idaho Code 63-1311A. 7. EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date for the recycling processing fee is predicated upon Council's approval of the fee following public hearing and execution by the parties of this AMENDMENT with the effective date established by Council to begin October 1, 2021 or as soon thereafter as practicable. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as herein above provided. Dated this 28th day of September , 202I Mayor Robert E. Simison 9-28-2022 Recycling Processing Fee Contract Amendment-2021 3 ATTEST , Chris Johnson, City Clerk Dated this ZD day of � ,� ;-�, ^ ,.�(� , 20219 Ryan Lawler Northwest Area President, Republic Services Recycling Processing Fee Contract Amendment - 2021 4 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution No. 21-2286: A Resolution Adopting the Fiscal Year 2022 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection Services; Authorizing Finance Department to Collect Such Fees; and Providing an Effective Date CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 21- 2286 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT,BORTON, CAVENER, HOAGLUN, PERREAULT, STRADER A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2022 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES; AUTHORIZING FINANCE DEPARTMENT TO COLLECT SUCH FEES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 21 of the City's solid waste franchise agreement with Republic Services, Inc., providing for annual review of rates and charges for services provided, Republic identified necessary updates to the solid waste collection fee schedule and presented proposed changes to the Solid Waste Advisory Commission and to the Meridian City Council; and WHEREAS,the Solid Waste Advisory Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the FY22 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection Services, as set forth in Exhibit A hereto; and WHEREAS,pursuant to Idaho Code section 63-1311A, following publication of notice and public hearing, the City Council of Meridian did, by formal motion, approve the FY22 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection Services, as set forth in Exhibit hereto; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY,IDAHO: Section 1. That the FY22 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection Services, as set forth in Exhibit A, is hereby adopted. Section 2. That, as of its effective date, the FY22 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection Services, as set forth in Exhibit A, will supersede all previous solid waste collection fees and fee schedules previously adopted. Section 3. That the Finance Department of the City of Meridian is hereby authorized to implement and carry out the collection of fees as set forth in Exhibit A. Section 4. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect on October 1, 2021. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 2&hday of September, 2021. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this Z&h day of September, 2021. APPROVED: ATTEST: Robert E. Simison, Mayor Chris Johnson, City Clerk ADOPTION OF FY21 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES PAGE 1 EXHIBIT A FY22 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES RESIDENTIAL TRASH & RECYCLING FEE DESCRIPTION FY21 FEE FY22 FEE Residential 95 gallon service (includes 1 recycling cart) $20.87 $21.66 Residential 65 gallon service (includes 1 recycling cart) $18.63 $19.34 Residential 35 gallon service (includes 1 recycling cart) $16.41 $17.03 Residential Extra Carts (per cart per month) $2.49 $2.58 Residential Cart Pickup/Upsize Exchange fee (per event) $14.80 $15.38 Residential Cart Delivery(free) $0.00 $0.00 Residential Carry Out Service $34.86 $36.22 COMMERCIAL PERMANENT TRASH FEE DESCRIPTION FY21 FEE FY22 FEE Fc-ommercial Carts Delivery Charge $11.12 $11.55 Commercial Carts 1, 95 gallon cart(1 x per week) $32.17 $33.39 Commercial Carts 1, 95 gallon cart(2 x per week) $60.82 $63.12 Commercial Carts 1, 95 gallon cart(3 x per week) $89.45 $92.84 Commercial Carts 2, 95 gallon cart(1 x per week) $64.35 $66.80 Commercial Carts 2, 95 gallon cart(2 x per week) $121.65 $126.27 Commercial Carts 2, 95 gallon cart(3 x per week) $178.88 $185.67 Commercial Carts 3, 95 gallon cart(1 x per week) $96.53 $100.20 Commercial Carts 3, 95 gallon cart(2 x per week) $182.47 $189.39 Commercial Carts 3, 95 gallon cart(3 x per week) $268.32 $278.49 Commercial Container Container Delivery Svc(2,3,6,8 yd options) $25.36 $26.35 Commercial Container Lid Lock Installation (2,3,6,8 yd options) $47.76 $49.63 Commercial Container Monthly Lock Service (2,3,6,8 yd options) $13.77 $14.31 Commercial Container 2 yd (Extra Dump) $26.14 $27.13 Commercial Container 3 yd (Extra Dump) $35.59 $36.93 Commercial Container 6 yd (Extra Dump) $51.75 $53.68 Commercial Container 8 yd (Extra Dump) $66.58 $69.06 Commercial Containers 2 yd (1x per week) $106.78 $110.80 Commercial Containers 2 yd (2x per week) $152.57 $158.23 Commercial Containers 2 yd (3x per week) $197.57 $204.84 Commercial Containers 2 yd (4x per week) $265.04 $274.79 Commercial Containers 2 yd (5 x per week) $332.37 $344.60 Commercial Containers 2 yd (6 x per week) $399.70 $414.46 9/2/2021 page 1 of 6 Commercial Containers 3 yd (1x per week) $111.17 $115.29 Commercial Containers 3 yd (2 x per week) $180.04 $186.64 Commercial Containers 3 yd (3 x per week) $249.03 $258.10 Commercial Containers 3 yd (4 x per week) $328.11 $340.05 Commercial Containers 3 yd (5 x per week) $431.35 $447.11 Commercial Containers 3 yd (6 x per week) $522.54 $541.64 Commercial Containers 6 yd (1 x per week) $173.42 $179.75 Commercial Containers 6 yd (2 x per week) $280.10 $290.16 Commercial Containers 6 yd (3 x per week) $386.67 $400.45 Commercial Containers 6 yd (4 x per week) $515.58 $533.96 Commercial Containers 6 yd (5 x per week) $644.56 $667.54 Commercial Containers 6 yd (6 x per week) $773.46 $801.04 Commercial Containers 8 yd (1 x per week) $205.86 $213.32 Commercial Containers 8 yd (2 x per week) $320.18 $331.53 Commercial Containers 8 yd (3 x per week) $433.25 $448.43 Commercial Containers 8 yd (4 x per week) $560.63 $580.21 Commercial Containers 8 yd (5 x per week) $696.21 $720.50 Commercial Containers 8 yd (6 x per week) $825.84 $854.62 Commercial Containers 8 yd (7 x per week) $1,259.28 $1,304.42 Commercial Compactors 2 yd (base price per pickup per week) $63.27 $65.74 Commercial Compactors 3 yd (base price per pickup per week) $87.59 $91.01 Commercial Compactors 4 yd (base price per pickup per week) $112.36 $116.75 Commercial Compactors 5 yd (base price per pickup per week) $137.16 $142.52 Commercial Compactors 6 yd (base price per pickup per week) $161.31 $167.62 Commercial Compactors 8 yd (base price per pickup per week) $216.59 $225.04 COMMERCIAL TEMPORARY TRASH FEE DESCRIPTION FY21 FEE FY22 FEE Commercial Temporary Service 3 yd Haul Svc(Municipal Solid Waste) $44.60 $46.12 Commercial Temporary Service 3 yd Haul Svc(Construction and Demolition) $119.45 $123.90 Commercial Temporary Service 3 yd (Monthly Rent) $26.67 $27.71 Commercial Temporary Service 3 yd (Daily Rent) $0.88 $0.91 9/2/2021 page 2 of 6 COMMERCIAL PERMANENT RECYCLING FEE DESCRIPTION FY21 FEE FY22 FEE Commercial Commingled Recycle Container Delivery Charge (3,5,6,8 yd options) $25.36 $26.35 Commercial Commingled Recycle 3 yd (Extra Dump) $18.28 $18.94 Commercial Commingled Recycl,3 yd (Every Other Week) $53.62 $55.59 Commercial Commingled Recych 3 yd (1 x week) $67.10 $69.48 Commercial Commingled Recycl,3 yd (2 x week) $118.40 $122.54 Commercial Commingled Recych 3 yd (3 x week) $169.73 $175.63 Commercial Commingled Recycle 3 yd (4 x week) $221.04 $228.70 Commercial Commingled Recycle 3 yd (5 x week) $272.33 $281.76 Commercial Commingled Recycle 5 yd (Extra Dump) $24.88 $25.76 Commercial Commingled Recycl,5 yd (Every Other Week) $73.74 $76.40 Commercial Commingled Recych 5 yd (1 x week) $102.27 $105.83 Commercial Commingled Recycl,5 yd (2 x week) $171.81 $177.65 Commercial Commingled Recych 5 yd (3 x week) $240.87 $248.96 Commercial Commingled Recycle 5 yd (4 x week) $310.16 $320.51 Commercial Commingled Recycle 5 yd (5 x week) $379.44 $392.07 Commercial Commingled Recycle 6 yd (Extra Dump) $30.24 $31.31 Commercial Commingled Recycl,6 yd (Every Other Week) $87.43 $90.59 Commercial Commingled Recych 6 yd (1 x week) $108.63 $112.38 Commercial Commingled Recycl,6 yd (2 x week) $194.17 $200.78 Commercial Commingled Recych 6 yd (3 x week) $279.68 $289.15 Commercial Commingled Recycle 6 yd (4 x week) $365.22 $377.54 Commercial Commingled Recycle 6 yd (5 x week) $450.76 $465.94 Commercial Commingled Recycle 8 yd (Extra Dump) $41.31 $42.79 Commercial Commingled Recycl.8 yd (Every Other Week) $103.76 $107.50 Commercial Commingled Recych 8 yd (1 x week) $129.84 $134.27 Commercial Commingled Recycl,8 yd (2 x week) $236.25 $244.19 Commercial Commingled Recych 8 yd (3 x week) $342.66 $354.11 Commercial Commingled Recycl,8 yd (4 x week) $449.11 $464.08 Commercial Commingled Recycle 8 yd (5 x week) $557.45 $576.01 Commercial Commingled Recycle 95 gallon carts (1 cart/week) $14.05 $14.56 Commercial Commingled Recycl.95 gallon carts (2 cart/week) $22.29 $23.08 Commercial Commingled Recycle 95 gallon carts (3 cart/week) $30.54 $31.61 Commercial Commingled Recycl,95 gallon carts (4 cart/week) $38.80 $40.15 Commercial Commingled Recycl;95 gallon carts (5 cart/week) $47.03 $48.65 9/2/2021 page 3 of 6 INDUSTRIAL TRASH FEE DESCRIPTION FY21 FEE FY22 FEE Industrial Trash Container Delivery Svc 6- 10 yd $25.63 $26.63 Industrial Trash 6- 10 yd containers (Haul Svc) $112.42 $118.87 Industrial Trash 6 yd Disposal Fee (Municipal Solid Waste) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Trash 6 yd Disposal Fee (C&D/Compacted) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Trash 6 yd (Monthly Rent) $56.66 $58.87 Industrial Trash 6 yd (Daily Rent) $1.87 $1.94 Industrial Trash 8 yd Disposal Fee (Municipal Solid Waste) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Trash 8 yd Disposal Fee (C&D/Compacted) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Trash 8 yd (Monthly Rent) $73.44 $76.31 Industrial Trash 8 yd (Daily Rent) $2.42 $2.51 Industrial Trash 10 yd Disposal Fee (Municipal Solid Waste) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Trash 10 yd Disposal Fee (C&D/Compacted) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Trash 10 yd (Monthly Rent) $81.84 $85.04 Industrial Trash 10 yd (Daily Rent) $2.70 $2.80 Industrial Trash Container Delivery Svc 20-40 yd $25.63 $26.63 Industrial Trash/Diversion/Recycling 20-40 yd screen lid $41.20 $42.81 Industrial Trash 20-40 yd containers (Haul Svc) $369.50 $386.00 Industrial Trash 20-40 yd containers (Haul Svc for Asbestos-Ada $320.43 $335.01 Industrial Trash 20-40 yd containers (Certification fee Asbestos-j $23.32 $23.32 Industrial Trash 20-40 yd containers (Haul Svc for Asbestos- Ida[ $320.43 $335.01 Industrial Trash 20 yd Disposal Fee (Municipal Solid Waste) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Trash 20 yd Disposal Fee (C&D/Compacted) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Trash 20 yd Disposal Fee (Asbestos-Ada County Landfi $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Trash 20 yd Disposal Fee (Asbestos- Idaho Waste Syste $800.00 $800.00 Industrial Trash 20 yd (Monthly Rent) $94.10 $97.77 Industrial Trash 20yd (Daily Rent) $3.11 $3.22 Industrial Trash 30 yd Disposal Fee (Municipal Solid Waste) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Trash 30 yd Disposal Fee (C&D/Compacted) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Trash 30 yd Disposal Fee (Asbestos-Ada County Landfi $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Trash 30 yd Disposal Fee (Asbestos- Idaho Waste Syste $1,200.00 $1,200.00 Industrial Trash 30 yd (Monthly Rent) $115.01 $119.50 Industrial Trash 30 yd (Daily Rent) $3.77 $3.92 Industrial Trash 40 yd Disposal Fee (Municipal Solid Waste) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Trash 40 yd Disposal Fee (C&D/Compacted) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Trash 40 yd Disposal Fee (Asbestos-Ada County Landfi $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Trash 40 yd disposal Fee (Asbestos- Idaho Waste Syste $1,600.00 $1,600.00 9/2/2021 page 4 of 6 Industrial Trash 40 yd (Monthly Rent) $131.43 $136.57 Industrial Trash 40 yd (Daily Rent) $4.31 $4.48 Industrial Trash 20yd compactor Disposal Fee $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Trash 25yd compactor Disposal Fee $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Trash 30yd compactor Disposal Fee $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Trash 40yd compactor Disposal Fee $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Diversion FEE DESCRIPTION FY21 FEE FY22 FEE Industrial Diversion Container Delivery Svc 6- 10 yd $25.63 $26.63 Industrial Diversion 6-8 yd containers (Haul Svc) $63.35 $65.83 Industrial Diversion 6 yd Disposal Fee (Wood) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Diversion 6 yd Disposal Fee (Sheetrock) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Diversion 6 yd Disposal Fee (Clean Rock, Gravel, etc.) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Diversion 8 yd Disposal Fee (Wood) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Diversion 8 yd Disposal Fee (Sheetrock) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Diversion 8 yd Disposal Fee (Clean Rock, Gravel, etc.) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Diversion 10 yd Disposal Fee (Wood) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Diversion 10 yd Disposal Fee (Sheetrock) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Diversion 10 yd Disposal Fee (Clean Rock, Gravel, etc.) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Diversion Container Delivery Svc 20-40 yd $25.63 $26.63 Industrial Diversion 20-40 yd Wood, Sheetrock, Clean Rock $141.39 $148.97 Industrial Diversion 20 yd Disposal Fee (Wood) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Diversion 20 yd Disposal Fee (Sheetrock) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Diversion 20 yd Disposal Fee (Clean Rock, Gravel, etc.) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Diversion 30 yd Disposal Fee (Wood) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Diversion 30 yd Disposal Fee (Sheetrock) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Diversion 30 yd Disposal Fee (Clean Rock, Gravel, etc.) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Diversion 40 yd Disposal Fee (Wood) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Diversion 40 yd Disposal Fee (Sheetrock) $30.74 $30.74 Industrial Diversion 40 yd Disposal Fee (Clean Rock, Gravel, etc.) $30.74 $30.74 INDUSTRIAL RECYCLING FEE DESCRIPTION FY21 FEE FY22 FEE Industrial Recycling Processing per loose yard (as applicable) $1.08 $1.08 Industrial Recycling Processing per compact yard (as applicable) $2.16 $2.16 Industrial Recycling Container Delivery Svc 6- 10 yd $25.63 $26.63 Industrial Recycling 6- 10 yd containers (Haul Svc) $63.35 $65.82 9/2/2021 page 5 of 6 Industrial Recycling 6 yd (Monthly Rent) $56.66 $58.87 Industrial Recycling 6 yd (Daily Rent) $1.87 $1.94 Industrial Recycling 8 yd (Monthly Rent) $73.44 $76.31 Industrial Recycling 8yd (Daily Rent) $2.42 $2.51 Industrial Recycling 10 yd (Monthly Rent) $81.84 $85.04 Industrial Recycling 10 yd (Daily Rent) $2.70 $2.81 Industrial Recycling Contain Deliver Svc 20-40 yd $25.63 $26.63 Industrial Recycling 20-40 yd containers (Haul Svc) $141.39 $148.97 Industrial Recycling 20 yd (Monthly Rent) $94.10 $97.77 Industrial Recycling 20 yd (Daily Rent) $3.11 $3.22 Industrial Recycling 30 yd (Monthly Rent) $115.01 $119.50 Industrial Recycling 30 yd (Daily Rent) $3.77 $3.92 Industrial Recycling 40 yd (Monthly Rent) $131.43 $136.57 Industrial Recycling 40 yd (Daily Rent) $4.31 $4.48 Industrial Recycling 15-40 yd Compactors (Haul Svc) $141.39 $148.97 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES FEE DESCRIPTION FY21 FEE FY22 FEE Miscellaneous Collection Tires 9 (ea.) up to 16 inch $6.17 $6.41 Miscellaneous Collection Freon-containing units/appliances $58.76 $61.06 Miscellaneous Collection Non-Freon units/appliances $16.66 $17.31 Miscellaneous Collection Special Collection (for each increment of 10 minut( $23.55 $24.47 Miscellaneous Collection Bulky Item Pickup (per item) $16.66 $17.31 Miscellaneous Collection Extra Pickup/Go Back(per occurrence) $11.88 $12.35 Miscellaneous Collection Relocation (all sizes)- Commercial/Industrial $25.63 $26.63 Industrial Services Turnaround compactor fee-Commercial/Industrial $17.98 $18.68 Miscellaneous Collection Weekend Charge- Industrial $72.77 $75.62 Miscellaneous Collection Pressure Wash- Industrial $214.54 $222.93 Industrial Services Dry Run - Large industrial containers and compact, $109.22 $113.49 Industrial Services Dry Run (6- 10 yd) $63.35 $65.83 Miscellaneous Collection Commercial Combo Lock Replacement $30.57 $31.77 Commercial Container Extra Yard (Overload Each yd) $16.29 $16.93 9/2/2021 page 6 of 6 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Parks and Recreation Department: Teen Activities Night Pilot Program Recap Page 301 E IDIAN IDAHO To: Mayor Robert Simison and Meridian City Council From: Renee White, Recreation Coordinator, Special Events MP&R Date: April 27, 2021 Subject: Teen Activities Night Pilot Program Background: In 2018 the Meridian Parks and Recreation Coordinators conducted a GAP analysis of our current programs. It became abundantly clear that teens and pre-teens were underserved. They have few places to hang out in our community. Observations at events such as Sparklight Movie Night support those claims. Teen attendance at movie night has continued to grow and is estimated at 250 plus on a typical Friday evening. The youth use the event as an opportunity to socialize. They hang out in groups, spend a lot of time in line at the concession stand, are often loud and disruptive to the families who are focused on the movie. Proposal: The parks staff would like to test a pilot program to address the need for youth to have somewhere to 'hang out' that is safe, offers engaging activities and positive interactions while also trying to deter attendance at movie night. We propose creating /a Teen Activities Night. Ilk �f 4 - �c S _ _ Location: Meridian Homecourt Dates: Friday,Aug. 6, 13 & 20 (These are for 2021 only. Future dates would run throughout summer once the threat of Covid being transmitted indoors has receded.) Times: 7—10 pm Admission fee: Free to youth Activities/Expenses : Free in the Homecourt • Volleyball • Pickleball • Basketball • Spikeball • Cornhole • Virtual Reality Video Games $500 (nightly includes equipment&staff) • Games/Equipment $300 (one-time purchase of board games, balls, etc) The Meridian Parks& Recreation were presented with the proposal in the March Commission meeting. They supported the pilot program and suggested that food and game prizes be included to attract youth to the new event. Food: $480 (pizza nightly) Prizes: $180(nightly prizes for games) Other Expenses: Security: $300 (nightly if Meridian Police (JET)team is not available) Marketing: $200 (one-time cost to promote event) Staffing: Use existing staff including recreation coordinator,volunteer coordinator, site supervisor, and homecourt staff. 2021 Teen Activities Night Budget Request$4,280 Ik mo _ yr - r}r Item#19. y CfAV I. August 6,13 9 20 7:00 10 `00 HIIMECOURT 936 Taylor Ave. Meridian (off Franklin Blvd) Page 304 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Parks and Recreation Department: Draft Urban Forestry Management Plan Presentation and Discussion Mayor Robert E. Simison City Council Members: E IDIAN Treg Bernt Brad Hoaglun Joe Borton Jessica Perreault D A H O Luke Cavener Liz Strader MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Simison and City Council FROM: Mike Barton,Parks Superintendent DATE: September 21,2021 RE: Urban Forestry Management Plan Our City Arborist Matt Perkins has written an Urban Forestry Management Plan that will be used as a guiding document for our department and the City. This plan organizes and defines what is currently being done and what our department's goals are for Meridian's urban forest. Matt Perkins would like to share the plan with Council and answer any questions you have regarding our urban forest. We are not seeking adoption of the plan but welcome any feedback that we can incorporate into the plan. E IDIAN*-- IDAHO URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN •E I }ayS5 Prepared by: Mayor: Robert E. Simison Matthew Perkins City Arborist Meridian Parks and Recreation Department Meridian City Council: 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 206 eg Bernt Joe Borton Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: 208-888-3579 1 Mobile: 208-371-1755 Luke Havener Brad Hoaglun Jessica Perreault Liz Strader E OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Definitions 3 History 4 Meridian Population 5 Why Urban Trees Are Important 5 Mission Statement 6 Process and Plan Development 7 Urban Forest Management Plan & Guiding Principles 8 Value of the Urban Forest 9-10 Current State of Meridian Urban Forest Tree Infrastructure 11-12 Tree Infrastructure Recommendations 13 Current Management of Meridian Urban Forest 14-17 Meridian's Urban Forest 18-19 Meridian's Relationship with the Urban Forest — Public and Private 20 Community Engagement Partners — Urban Forest Stakeholders 21-22 Management of the Forest Recommendations / Department Goals 23 Meridian Urban Forestry Goals & Strategies 24-34 Conclusion 35 Appendices 36-51 Y tE! 4 s `v> Page 308 2 Llte,#20. DuCTIOA' The Urban Forest is an essential component of any municipal infrastructure, and is the only community infrastructure that increases in value over time. The trees that make up the Urban Forest should be thought of, and managed as city assets, that have a real and recognizable value. That value can only truly be capitalized on by implementing a sound management plan. Meridian's Urban Forest produces a multitude of benefits for the community and is well worth continued investment. Definitions: Urban Forest-Tree dominated vegetation, or collected masses of trees and other shrubs etc. found within a given urban area including parks, street trees, gardens, landscapes, along pathways, river corridors etc. For the purposes of this plan, the term "Urban Forest" refers specifically to"City Managed Trees" Tree-Any woody plant which is ten feet(10') or more in height at maturity, with single or multiple trunks, often unbranched for several feet above ground and having a definite crown. Public Tree-Any tree (inclusive of roots within critical root zone)whose trunk is located partly or in whole, on Public Property. City Managed Tree-These are the trees within the Urban Forest that the City assumes responsibility for. Critical Root Zone-The area under a tree extending from the base of the tree in all directions to an imaginary line equal to the drip line, defined by industry standards as 1'(foot) radius from base of tree's trunk for every 1" (inch) DBH, or as determined at a preliminary site inspection by the City Arborist. Public Property-Any property owned by, dedicated to, or deeded to the public or for the publics use. City parks, public Right of Way and other publicly owned, controlled, leased, or managed properties are included in this definition. Right of Way-The land which is commonly associated with public easements granted to Ada County Highway District (ACHD) accepted on behalf of the public by deed of purchase originally intended for development of highway, or for utilities, drainage, access and other purposes. City Arborist-A professional in the practice of Arboriculture, who is the official designated by the Director of the Meridian City Parks and Recreation Department. Certified Arborist-A tree Industry Professional who has demonstrated their technical knowledge in the field of Arboriculture by passing an exam administered by the International Society of Arboriculture and signing a code of ethics. 5 � J 11 old r l J Y Page 309 3 Item#20. R S i� h• ../ice' + HISTORY The original Meridian town site was filed in 1893 on homestead grant land belonging to Eliza Ann Zenger. Her husband, Christian, filed the plat with county officials and called it Meridian. While the Zengers moved from Utah, many other early settlers left their homes in Missouri to come west. They either traveled by wagon or immigrant railroad car, bringing their lodge and church preferences with them. They established local institutions soon after arriving and filed for homestead lands. In other words, they brought their community with them. Meridian was incorporated as a village in 1903 with a population of approximately 200 and a bustling business center. A creamery was built in 1897, and other dairy-related businesses followed, as Meridian established itself as a dairy center for the state. This part of the community's history is still celebrated annually during Meridian Dairy Days in June. Dairy Days has been observed in one form or another since 1929. Around the turn of the century, settlers established fruit orchards and built fruit packing businesses and prune dryers along the railroad tracks. Local orchards produced many varieties of apples and Italian prunes. Production continued through the mid-1940s, when it was no longer profitable and the businesses closed. In 1941, Meridians status changed from a village to a city. The Meridian City Parks and Recreation Department was created in 1998. At the time, the parks system consisted of only two (2) parks. Since then Meridian's parks system has expanded to include eighteen (18) regional, community and neighborhood parks, with plans on the horizon for more parks to come. There are also now several other city owned and managed properties, such as the Meridian City Police Department, six (6)fire stations, a Waste Water Resource Recovery Facility (WWRRF), multiple other pump stations, and as of 2020, the Lakeview Golf Course. Page 310 4 MERIDIAN POPULATION The City of Meridian is said to have the If fastest growing population in the state of l/ Idaho and to be one of the fastest growing cities in the nation. According to the Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho (COMPASS), Meridian's estimated population as of 2020 was 119,350 and it is expected to continue growing. With this growth comes ; *:a development, and as a city grows the _ importance of open green space for the people who live in the community becomes increasingly necessary so they may have the space to connect with nature andLgt recreate safely in healthy environments. WHY URBAN TREES? Trees are dynamic, living and growing organisms that are constantly changing, and because they are often added to plans as an "afterthought", they don't always fit into the spaces that are designated for them to grow in. Incorporating space for trees to grow in urban environments can be tricky and can raise the expenses of new development and building projects quickly. As a result trees, are often eliminated from plans entirely. Meridian needs an Urban Forest Management Program to help our citizens, business owners, and our employees understand the importance of trees and the need for proper care of our urban forest. The benefits provided by a properly managed and maintained urban forest are detailed further in the "Value of the Urban Forest"section of this plan. The City of Meridian recognizes and understands these values and TNT benefits, and strives to incorporate .tea fir.. these considerations in all ' development plans in a responsible and reasonable manner that makes sense for the area. It considers how these goals can be attained while incorporating the best interest of all ` L f s parties involved. Part of Meridian's plan is to provide spaces where trees can grow, thrive and realize their full �__ �` potential, as well as provide places � where people can enjoy the benefits these spaces provide. This is why Meridian invests heavily in a system of r tir ' public parks where all of these ' elements can come to fruition. Page 311 5 •L._ •1 1 IPA. 1.11 1.•.J. r _ 1 �1 •r•-ti - •� �1 7 •�, 1 1 7� 1 r •1 r1 �iL• ' X . .• . . 1 1 �. 1, ,� •- • , - ' ,�•-•1.1 ti ■ L 1 .1 1 •f��• 1 Ir '•1.� r 1■ tit• y` f1 1 1� r.••••_ ir .1• •�1 f 1 1■ 1■ r' 1 } r f f. 111'ItbCESS AND PLAN DEVELOPMENT Throughout 2015, the Meridian Parks and Recreation staff worked to develop and refine a Parks and Recreation Master Plan which will help guide the direction, growth and delivery of its services over the next ten years. The plan was accomplished using feedback from Meridian City Council, the Meridian Parks and Recreation Commission, a citizen task force and community stakeholders, the results from a survey of Meridian residents, and guidance from professional parks and recreation consultants firm named GreenPlay LLC. The Master Plan identified 8 STRATEGIC GOALS for the Forestry Department to work towards: 1. Establish a Vision for Meridian Urban Forestry Urban Forestry shall continue to provide a high level of service to the community by responding to tree related calls from the public and retain its current operating model of caring for all park trees; providing review and comment on development applications as they relate to mitigation, plantings on City owned property and in the downtown core area; and maintaining the current tree inventory. 2. Strengthen Approach to Management of the Urban Forest Staff will complete the ongoing GIS inventory and formalize as a comprehensive data set for use as a management tool. Additional staff training will be required with implementation to maximize efficiency. GIS software updates and yearly technical support is ongoing to provide what is needed to manage urban forestry. 3. Evaluate Impacts of the Projected Park System Expansion on Urban Forestry An understanding of the impacts of growth to maintenance of the urban forest will allow the City to maintain its current high level of service. It is recommended that annual assessments be conducted during the budget development process to determine needs for additional staff and equipment so as to achieve alignment with the overall master plan. 4. Guarantee the Present and Future Health of the Urban Forest The City Arborist will work to further the health and longevity of the urban forest through diversification of tree species and age, anticipation of pests and other potential threats, and implementation of standards for planting and tree selection. Staff shall also seek continuing education on urban forestry trends, including the effects of climate change as related to forest health. 5. Maintain and Promote the Kleiner Arboretum as a Community Asset Develop a strategic management plan to guide future expansion, ensure adequate maintenance resources, and create greater awareness of the arboretum within the local and regional communities. 6. Preserve Strong Relationship with the Community/Seek Additional Opportunities for Education and Outreach Continue to work with the community in support of tree-related issues, while seeking additional opportunities to partner with other agencies, educate community members on the urban forest, and increase awareness of its value to our community. 7. Revise City Policy as Necessary to Strengthen Urban Forestry Periodically review and update the City ordinance to reflect changes in the field of Urban Forestry or updates resulting from changes in the law. Updates may address changes to terms, definitions, best practices, or other considerations, as required to stay current with the industry. 8. Continue to Offer and Develop Special Programs Related to Community Forestry Continue to offer and develop new programs that benefit the community and increase awareness of Urban Forestry. As programs are initiated, seek community participation first and then employ the City budgeting process to determine staffing and funding implications. Periodically review and update the City ordinance to reflect changes in the field of Urban Forestry or updates resulting from legal action in America. Updates may address changes to terms, definitions, best practices, or other considerations, as required to stay current with the industry. Page 313 7 ' bAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN Routine inspection and maintenance of public trees under an official Urban Forest Management Plan will reduce risk to the City and the public presented by falling branches and trees. A clear and sustained effort to properly maintain our Urban Forest will provide a safer environment for the community. Following this Urban Forest Management Plan will ensure the proper continued care and growth of our city canopy through effective policies and long-term maintenance. This plan will serve as a tool for the planning and management of existing trees, and for developing future canopy which will result in a well-maintained, and healthy Urban Forest. With this plan in place, and the successful implementation thereof, the City of Meridian will benefit greatly, and the citizens will enjoy these benefits for generations to come. The Forestry Program has identified five guiding principles to help direct the management of the Urban Forest in Meridian, these guiding principles are outlined here, and are tied directly into the "Goals & Strategies" section of this plan These agreements are intended to be carried out with the cooperation of community residents, and program stakeholders: IP fir? 'fir � �� •• • • • - • r -ter \V 4 d MCA �� v�l��,r �" ,, N •. • x Page 314 8 ate"'#2o. E OF THE URBAN FOREST There are many ways in which urban trees increase human quality of life. When '< planned for appropriately and planted correctly, trees in the urban landscape y� provide many economic benefits including but not limited to; increased property w values, reduced demand on sewer systems through reduced storm water runoff and erosion, reduced wear on city streets, enhanced air quality, carbon sequestration, energy conservation through shade and wind protection, and noise abatement. There are also many various public health benefits associated with urban trees, and investing in the community forest benefits everyone, not just the privileged, therefore adding an element of social justice. Another non-monetary yet important benefit of urban trees is the creation of wildlife habitat for animals, especially birds, as well as other beneficial insects and pollinators. Public Health Communities that have a healthy Urban Forest will have a healthier population. People who live around trees are three times more likely to be physically active and 40% less likely to be overweight(Donovan, G.H et. al.). Healthy trees also provide important air purification benefits. In a study conducted by the U.S. Forest Service, it was found that communities that have lost massive numbers of trees were linked to higher death rates. Urban trees also lower stress levels and even improve recovery time for patients when given a view of trees. Social Benefits Urban trees contribute to important social and community dynamics. Trees provide an opportunity for citizens to engage in an issue that benefits not only themselves, but their neighbors, and the entire community. Urban trees also promote sustainable transportation in many ways, by slowing down vehicle traffic and helping to guide motorists, making them physically safer by providing a barrier, and thus creating a naturally convenient design in transportation (Tarran, 2009). Urban trees have also been shown to aid in reducing crime rates. Areas with high numbers of healthy trees can reduce crime rates as much as 50% compared to areas with low levels of vegetation (Kuo and Sullivan, 2001). A 10% increase in canopy cover can result in a 12% reduction in crime levels (Troy, Grove and O'Niel-Dunne, 2012). These trees also lower the fear of crime, thus lowering stress levels (Donovan and Prestemon, 2013). Storm Water Management Urban trees, when planned for and planted properly work symbiotically with other parts of the city infrastructure. Urban trees can reduce the demand on sewer systems during periods of storm water runoff. Tree canopies absorb rainwater, lessening the amount of water entering the sewer system. Much of the water that runs down the trunk of a tree is taken up by the roots. As much as 80% of rainfall in the summer months can be absorbed by trees on impervious surfaces with tree pits (Stringer and Ennos, 2013). When a raindrop is intercepted by a tree's canopy, it does not impact the soil, thus limiting erosion. These valuable soils are retained, and the sewer system does not have to process the particulate matter. An average mature Ash tree will intercept 1,209 gallons of water every year with an implied value of$13 per year per tree (McPherson et.al, 2003). Trees also increase the soil's capacity to store rainfall through transpiration, and they increase soil organic matter. Energy Savings Trees can also provide important energy conservation services in an urban environment by shading buildings from the summer's sun and insulating them from the winter wind. Deciduous trees are able to absorb radiant energy from the sun in the summer, yet in the winter they allow it through their leafless branches. Because we value the sun's radiant energy in the winter, we should be sure to plant trees strategically around our homes and buildings so that we may realize the best energy savings (ISA website and Matheny and Clark, 2008).Trees that are planted on the west and north sides of buildings can help to dissipate winter winds coming from those directions. Air mass in a buildings with poor insulation can change two to three times each hour, and even in well-sealed homes,the air mass can change once every two to three hours. Trees that deflect winter wind can reduce air infiltration by up to 50%, resulting in a heating savings of 10 to 12% (Heister, 1986). Page 315 9 Item#20. ty y absorbing gaseous pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and smog; trees help to improve air quality. Airborne contaminates such as particulates in the air associated with soil tillage, construction, and erosion that are associated with asthma, heart and lung disease, and cancer are intercepted by trees. During the process of photosynthesis, trees help to lower air temperatures with the shade they produce by releasing oxygen and transpiring water into the air. Trees are also able to sequester carbon in the atmosphere by converting it into sugars, which in time are turned into woody materials that become part of the tree structure. These trees can also reduce noise from vehicles and construction, and even block undesirable views. Economic Value Well-maintained urban forests create value. A survey by Arbor National Mortgage, Inc., found that a building lot with trees would "be as much as 20% more saleable than a house on a lot without trees." Investments in trees pay off with these perceived values and in tax revenue generated from increased lot values. Mature trees also reduce the temperatures of the streets below and, in turn, decrease the need for street maintenance from every seven to 10 years to every 20 to 25 years (Matheny and Clark, 2008). Studies have also shown that consumers in shopping districts that are shaded by urban trees tend to linger and shop longer (Matheny and Clark, 2008). These consumers are also willing to pay higher prices and tend to have greater patronage for goods and services in these districts. Landscaping with plants and trees positively influences businesses by: Increasing workplace productivity and morale Helping to recruit new employees Attracting new customers or new business tenants Being viewed as an employee benefit Playing a role in creating a corporate image Playing a role as a marketing tool (Reif, 1996) C .V -fie t, rf� 111� Page 316 10 L/te,#20. ENT STATE OF MERIDIAN'S URBAN FOREST TREEINFRASTRUCTURE Treasure Valley Canopy Assessment In 2013, with funding provided by the USDA Forest Service and the State & Private Forestry (S&PF)Western Competitive Resource Allocation Program, the Idaho Department of Lands in conjunction with Ada County Highway District, Boise State University, Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho (COMPASS), Idaho Power, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, the Southwest Idaho Resource Conservation and Development Council conducted a survey/inventory of the canopy cover throughout the entire Treasure Valley. The data was collected using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) combined with field-based measurements. This assessment identified not only the current urban forest canopy of the Treasure Valley, and the types of land cover to establish a benchmark, but they were also able to identify where the most ideal, practical, and cost-efficient locations and/or opportunities to expand the urban forest canopy existed. r Based on the Treasure Valley Urban Tree Canopy (UTC)Assessment(full report can be found at: http://www.tvcanopy.net/resources/)completed in 2013, the City of Meridian has a seven percent urban tree canopy. Condition The condition of Meridian's Urban Forest varies, and consists of a mix of mostly healthy newer/younger trees while having some older and mature trees interspersed in different pockets throughout the city parks and the Downtown Core. Species Diversity Generally, the Internationally accepted recommendation for tree diversity in Urban Forests is to have no more than 30% of any Family, 20% of any Genus, and 10% of any Species represent the total tree population*. This may not be fully achievable in Meridian due to the existing tree population prior to developing this plan, however the concept should be employed and every effort should be made to incorporate this theory into future planning. Species diversity is important to any plant population for the ecology to thrive. Monocultures harm the greater environment by inviting disease and depleting soil resources and diversification of symbiotic animal life. The same principles hold true when looking at the population of trees in an urban forest. When there is low species diversity present, the tree population is especially vulnerable to insects and disease. If an insect or disease were to be introduced to an area it could devastate the tree population. Currently, as can be seen in the chart labeled as "Figure 1" on page 12, which is based on the inventory that has been collected to date, the Meridian Urban Forest Canopy consists of over 15% Fraxinus (Ash)trees. This number does not include Ash trees that are located on private property or other R.O.W. that is not accounted for in the public tree inventory. Therefore, the percentage of the canopy that is made up by Fraxinus is most likely much higher than 15%. * Some professional recommendations go even further, suggesting that Genus diversity is what matters most and that no single Genus should account for more than 5% of total canopy. Page 317 11 Item#20. Meridian Public Canopy by Genus 5.20%_ 4.70% 5.20% 5.20% 10.90% ■ Gleditsia (Honeylocust) ■ Acer(Maple) ■ Fraxinus (Ash) Pinus(Pine) ■ Pyrus(Pear) ■ Picea (Spruce) ■Tilia (Linden) ■ Platanus (Sycamore) ■ Quercus ■ Malus (Apple) ■ Liriodendron (Tulip) Figure 1: Tree Diversity by Genus Age Diversity Age diversity is another indicator of Urban Forest health and uses similar-sized trees of a particular species for comparison against the total tree population. With principles similar to species diversity, an Urban Forest should be comprised of no more than 33% of one age class (young, medium, or old). This rule provides a basic resource structure so a younger age class is always ready to replace the older age classes. 3-6in 45.2% 6.12in 26.9% 0-3in 18.7% 12.18in 5.1% 18.24in 1.9% Not Specified 0.8% 24.30in 0.7% >30in 0 6% Figure 2:Tree Diversity by Age/Size Page 318 12 Item#20. TREE INFRASTRUCTURE RECOMMENDATIONS Greater Diversity of Species—Building greater diversity into the Urban Forest is feasible, but it will take some time. The Meridian Urban Forest is currently dominated by 3 Genus that together comprise nearly 50% of the total canopy, this is not congruent with International Recommendations and could result in the problems associated with monocultures mentioned previously. The Meridian City Arborist will take this information into consideration when planning future planting sites and will try to increase diversity. this can also be accomplished through working with planners and developers to start incorporating a greater variety of tree species and sizes into their landscape plans, and through working with local nurseries to promote the availability of a greater variety of species among their stock and supplies. Greater Diversity of Age—Meridian is still a "new" city so there is not much that can be done about creating a wider range of mature trees throughout the city; growing trees takes time. The best thing we can do is work to maintain and protect our existing trees in a healthy condition and try to preserve and protect older trees during development. Plan Review—One component in the successful management of the urban forest is the review of development plans. The City Arborist shall take an active role in reviewing any and all landscape plans associated with ongoing development projects throughout the city. • Plant Palettes should be reviewed to ensure that appropriate species are being called for in all landscape designs. • Effort should be made to preserve and protect existing mature trees whenever possible • When preserving existing trees is not possible, it is important to require mitigation to help offset the loss of canopy and to help absorb the cost associated with creating new canopy. Tree Mitigation—A very necessary component in the successful management of the urban forest is the retention and protection of existing mature tree canopy wherever feasible in all development projects. As the city grows and new development occurs, existing mature tree canopy can be lost very quickly, these losses can add up fast and result in drastic increases in the Urban Heat Index. These areas where canopy is lost and new hard surfaces, infrastructure, and paved areas are constructed are commonly referred to as "Urban Heat Islands". An Urban Heat Island is defined as a metropolitan area that is hotter than the surrounding rural area. When cumulative hard surface area starts to add up it can lead to environmental conditions that are unpleasant for ongoing daily life such as Increased air temperatures caused by refracted light and heat from hard surfaces, and a lack of shade etc. Studies show that ambient air temperatures among these Urban Heat Islands can be 1°-7° higher during the daytime and 2°-5° higher during the night. These increased temperatures naturally can lead to higher energy costs associated with air conditioning, and can also lead to an excessive water use from an increase in irrigation demands, not to mention a higher level of airborne pollutants such as fine particulate matter and volatile organic compounds (VOC's). Planning for the space that is needed for growing trees in the urban environment is a smart way to offset these problems associated with the Urban Heat Island effect. The upfront cost is usually higher for these types of installations, and these higher costs usually result in the elimination of these smart spaces from construction plans, but in the long game, smart space design pays off with high dividends that easily offset the initial higher costs.. Page 319 13 'rem#2o. ENT MANAGEMENT OF THE MERIDIAN URBAN FOREST The Meridian Urban Forestry Division currently consists of one full time employee identified as the Meridian City Arborist. As the city continues to expand and the Parks system and Urban Canopy evolves there could be a need for additional full-time staff. Safety Safety of the public, and city employees, is of paramount importance at ALL times during any and all Forestry or Parks and Recreation related operations. Appropriate PPE (Personal Protection Equipment)for the task at hand is required at all times. When performing Forestry work it is common to be using Chainsaws, Wood Chipper/Shredders, Stump Grinders, Back Hoes, Skid Steers, Loaders, Cranes, Bucket lifts etc. as well as non-powered tools such as Hand Saws, Pole Saws, Loppers and Hand Pruners. When operating any of the tools associated with Forestry work it is REQUIRED that staff be properly trained in the use of the equipment necessary to get the job done. The following is a list of Tools/Equipment associated with Forestry work and the required PPE for each item: Chainsaw— Hard Hat(with side protection), Safety Glasses (with wrap around protection or additional face shield), Leather Gloves, Hearing Protection (Earplugs and/or Ear Muffs), Chainsaw Protective Chaps, and Closed Toe Shoes. Wood Chipper/Shredder—Same as Chainsaw, plus no loose clothing or"cuffed"gloves that can get caught on branches being pulled into chipper. Stump Grinder—Same as above Hand Tools (Hand Saws, Loppers, Pruners etc.)—Leather Gloves, Safety Glasses, Close Toed Shoes, and when performing over head work a Hard Hat (preferably with side protection) Bucket Lift— Fall Protection Safety Lanyard & Hard Hat(with side protection) Meridian City Forestry does not currently own a wood chipper/shredder, bucket lift, or stump grinder. Currently, the City rents this equipment from vendors when needed. Acquiring a chipper/shredder would greatly benefit the Forestry unit and increase efficiency when performing work with in-house staff. Emergency Response Occasionally, most commonly associated with a storm event, one (or some)of the trees in Meridian Parks will experience a partial or complete failure. When this happens, it is usually the Parks Employee who is on call for that time period who hears about it first. The objective in this case is to make sure the scene is safe, and that there is no further risk associated with the incident. Sometimes it is necessary to clean up the debris at the time of the event. Contracted Tree Work Meridian City administers maintenance contracts for downtown street trees and selected trees on park properties. Outside vendors must be Certified Arborists with the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA). Only Certified Arborists may perform work. Contractors must follow ANSI standards and use best management practices and meet other requirement established by the City for outside vendors. Outside vendors must be Certified Arborists with the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA). Only Certified Arborists may perform work. Contractors must follow ANSI standards and use best management practices and meet other requirements established by the City for outside vendors. Annual contracted amounts vary, depending on which park or area is being pruned or added to the budget for the coming year. Large trees requiring specialized equipment are pruned on a five-year cycle by contract. Smaller trees are pruned by forestry staff when time allows, on an as-needed yearly or bi-yearly basis, or five-year cycle. Forestry staff will raise all tree limbs for clearance over sidewalks, pathways, and all other park areas each year as needed, and as time allows. The level of maintenance required by the Kleiner Park Arboretum is higher and more specialized than standard tree maintenance levels within the parks system at large. Page 320 14 Item#20. ns Regular routine inspections of the trees contained on the properties owned and maintained by the City of Meridian are conducted on an annual basis at the same time the annual pruning cycle inspections are performed. Inspections are also generated on a per incident basis such as after a storm event or accident or at the time an "in house request" is generated. Tree Inventory The current inventory of Meridian's City managed properties consists of over 6,000 trees. Keeping track of maintenance performed on these trees is not only important for managing tree resources, but also for liability reasons. Knowing the locations of all the trees, especially the Ash trees, is important for planning for EAB (Emerald Ash Borer)and implementing an EAB Course of Action Plan (see the management recommendations section). It is also important to know the locations of identified available planting spaces for augmenting the strategic planting of new trees. The inventory will help preserve our mature tree population and save the city thousands of dollars in management costs. The importance of maintain the Inventory regularly can be demonstrated easily by updating the DBH of trees in a given area and comparing the benefits analysis. The ecosystem benefits of the urban forest are measured by collecting species, DBH, and the type of land use where the trees are growing. The data is based off of calculations that were designed by i-Tree Research which is capable of determining total Monetary, Stormwater Monetary, Runoff Prevention, Property Value, Energy Savings, Air Quality, Pollutant and Carbon Sequestration. The figure below is an example taken Total Tree Value and Savings Total Monetary Benefit:$290,648 Benefits are only calculated for trees with defined species,DBH,and land use based on i-Tree research.Totals are annual amounts. 1 1 a Stormwater Monetary Property Value Total Energy Savings Air Quality Monetary Benefit Carbon Monetary Benefit Benefit $186,652© $18,733© $5,012© $6,668 $46,181 © Energy Saved(kWh) Pollutants removed(lb) Carbon Stored(lb) Runoff Prevention(Gallons) 288,5230 2,7310 952,5960 4,492,6200 Natural Gas Savings Carbon Sequestered(lb) $27,404© 506,9780 Heat Prevention(Therms) Carbon Avoided(lb) 28,4480 506,4990 Figure 3:Ecosystem Benefits from Meridian City Urban Canopy Tree Planting Trees in the city of Meridian shall be planted for function and performance. A large tree with a broad-leaved canopy offers more benefits overtime. These trees can reach heights of 60 feet or more and have life spans up to 100 years. Planting should be encouraged where root and canopy space is adequate. Small ornamental trees that require less growing space are a wise choice where root development or overhead constraints exist. New tree plantings occur regularly throughout the parks system as spaces are identified. When trees are removed they are generally replanted as soon as possible and careful attention is given to selection at the time of planting to avoid planting species that are susceptible to disease organisms or adverse growing conditions that may present in the area. The City of Meridian has adopted the Tree Planting Specifications that have been established by the International Society of Arboriculture and accepted throughout the green industry as accepted best Management Practice. (See Appendices for Tree Planting Specifications Diagrams) Page 321 15 ttem#20. nd Disease Management --IPM Annual pro-active preventative plant health care measures are applied to trees throughout City properties to help ensure that trees cared for by the City have the opportunity to grow and thrive and reach their maximum potential. Plant Health Care consists of treating trees systemically with pesticides to prevent damage caused by insect pests that feed on either the foliage or woody tissues of the plant. One example of this is how Ash trees throughout the parks system are sprayed annually to prevent new infestations of Lilac Ash Borers and to help mitigate current active populations that are capable of interior structural damage that can cause parts of affected trees, or entire trees, to die or fail. Using the TreePlotter Inventory the city has built, maps of the locations of trees that require treatment can be created and printed out to be used while in the field. This helps streamline the process and cuts down on the time and costs associated with this task. Tree Pruning Maintenance Setting trees up on a five-to seven (5-7)year pruning rotation will increase the benefits produced from the Urban Forest and reflect positively on the city. Maintaining trees early on when they are juvenile and training them to have good branch structure and spacing will reduce the workload of maintenance calls and decrease the amount of storm damage that occurs. Proactively maintaining the community forest in this way is one of the most essential elements of this plan, and by implementing this system, Meridian will be enacting a cost-effective measure that maximizes the benefits and minimizes the risks in the Urban Forest. Hazardous Tree Removal Periodically, usually as the result of a storm or other such weather-related event, a portion of or an entire tree will become a hazard to the public. This can include a large diameter branch that is broken and hung up in the tree, or an unstable root plate due to shallow or saturated soil conditions, or even a cavity of decay that was present in the tree but was largely undetectable due to a lack of signs or symptoms. At any time that such a tree is found and determined to be hazardous, the city will move to either mitigate the hazard by eliminating the portion of the tree that poses risk or by removing the tree entirely. . i IN f, ., - a ) ,will _.. - :•k Page 322 16 ttem#20. Pathways and Forestry Meridian Parks and Recreation team maintains approximately 16 miles of pathways throughout the city. Not all of the pathways have trees lining them, and in most cases, the trees adjacent to our pathways are on private property. There are occasions when a tree may fall over onto a pathway as the result of storm damage, or when a private property tree has low hanging branches that are impeding pedestrian traffic along the pathway. In such cases Meridian Forestry will respond and clean up fallen trees, or contact the adjacent property owner to require them to have the work done or get permission to do the work ourselves. Public Tree Inspections At times, the Arborist will receive calls from the public seeking information or advice about trees on or near their own properties. These are opportunities for the Arborist to help educate and inform the public on Best Management Practices and making the right decisions when it comes to caring for and planning for trees. Occasionally, especially in the case when a tree that is on ROW property is concerned, the Arborist will even visit the site to help guide the property owner in making the right decision. Nuisance Trees &Code Enforcement Conflicts about trees on private and adjacent properties arise on occasion and Code Enforcement Officers do not have the technical knowledge necessary for making decisions about tree care. The City Arborist acts as a technical advisor or consultant in these cases, and can visit a site to perform and inspection to determine if a tree is actually creating a hazardous condition and needs to be removed or if a problem can be solved through other proper tree care measures. Meridian City Code section 4-2-1 (in addition to 13-2-11) NUISANCE TREE: Any tree or part thereof which, by reason of location or condition: constitutes a hazard to public safety; obstructs the free passage of pedestrian or vehicular traffic; fails to provide a vertical clearance of eight feet (8') over a sidewalk or fourteen feet(14') over a street; obstructs public street lighting; harbors pests or disease. PUBLIC TREE: Any tree, including roots within the critical root zone, whose trunk is located, partly or in whole, on public property. C. Private property owners shall be responsible for maintaining any and all public trees upon public rights of way adjacent to such private property. Where a public tree is a nuisance tree, the owner of record of the adjacent private property, as reflected on the most recent assessment roll, shall be presumed to be responsible for creating, causing, committing, maintaining, and/or allowing such nuisance. It shall be unlawful for any person to damage, mutilate or destroy any public tree; attach any device or structure to a public tree; or store, spill or dump substances, whether liquid or solid, which may be harmful to any part of a public tree. Tree Mitigation Currently, the City Arborist reviews development plans to make sure that plant palettes are consistent with the growing conditions of the area and are not specifying monocultures or plantings that will result in high cost maintenance or high risk IPM practices. Plans are also reviewed to ensure that efforts are being made by developers to try and retain existing mature canopy, incorporate it into their plans, and protect those trees which have been identified for retention during the process of development. The City Arborist reviews plans to check for these specifications and to make recommendations if needed. When existing trees are called out in plans to be retained and protected during the development process, there are industry standards in the Unified Development Code to which a link is included as a part of the appendices of this plan and/or can be found at: https://library.municode.com/id/meridian/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeld=TlTl1UNDECO_CH3REAPALDI_ARTBLARE Page 323 17 Item#20. IAN'S URBAN FOREST At the time this Urban Forest Management Plan was being drafted, Meridian had been identified as one of the fastest growing cities in the U.S. The City of Meridian recognizes the benefits that trees provide for the people who live, work, and recreate within the community. The urban forest canopy in Meridian at large consists of trees on public and right of way properties, as well as City parks, commercial and private properties. However, the Meridian City Ordinance identifies the trees that are contained within the City Parks and the Main Downtown Core, as well as city owned/operated facilities and buildings, as the trees that it will be responsible for. Current care of trees within public rights-of-way involves cooperation between ACHD, the City of Meridian, and the Meridian Development Corporation. Meridian Parks and Recreation bears ultimate responsibility for management of urban street trees in the downtown core area. It is imperative that: • All agencies and organizations with jurisdiction hold to the same standards for tree planting, care, and maintenance. • All agencies work together to set priorities for how to achieve and maintain these standards. The trees in these defined spaces will from hereon be referred to as the trees that are considered Meridian Urban Forest also referred to a City Management Trees. Meridian Downtown Core Trees Growing in planter boxes within the R.O.W. in . Meridian's Downtown Core, which is identified as: r Ada St North to Carlton Ave. • N Meridian Rd East to N East 3rd St. A section referred to as the"Split Corridor"that consists of the trees along Main St. starting at E .: ..., ' Central Dr. South to E Franklin Rd mostly on the East side. • "Split Corridor Phase 2" is a quadrant at Meridian Rd/ Main St. and E Ada St. - = The"North Curve" is a small quadrant where Main St. intersects with Fairview Ave. Park Trees Trees that are planted and growing in the parks throughout the city. These open green spaces are important to communities and a necessary component P of the general health of the public. Providing spaces for the public to recreate in and connect with nature to relieve daily stress and decompress. Parks would not be t the same without trees to provide shade and respite from the urban city environment. MEMO MOMS NUNN r G' w Other City Facilities, Lakeview Golf Club, ROW Managed by agreement, Pine Ave east of Meridian Rd. Page 324 18 item#20. king trees, although part of the Urban Canopy at large, for the purposes of this plan, herein are not considered as "Meridian Urban Forest." Right of Way (R.O.W.) The easement between Meridian streets to the inside-most edge of sidewalks or pedestrian walking paths that is owned by Ada County Highway District. Care for the #` r trees growing in these spaces is defined by City Ordinance as the responsibility of = the adjacent property owner.; 17E Subdivisions & HOA's Planned Communities that sometimes contain R.O.W. trees growing within the R.O.W. and/or common area spaces of these communities are the responsibility of the residents who live therein and/or adjacent to them. The Meridian City Unified Development Code requires trees to be planted as buffering within these spaces to extend the recognized benefits of trees to the citizens who live within these communities and to add much-desired aesthetic values to the neighborhoods. These trees also contribute on a large scale to a positive impact on the Urban Heat Stress Index. y %.f 14 r r W Page 325 19 DIAN'S RELATIONSHIP WITH THE URBAN FOREST- PUBLIC AND PRIVATE The City of Meridian Forestry Ordinance establishes laws for the care of trees that are growing on City and public properties which are to be administered/governed by the City Arborist as set forth by the ordinance as follows: (See Appendices;Appendix A for complete ordinance) 13-2-11: ESTABLISHMENT AND DUTIES OF THE CITY ARBORIST: A. Designation. The Director of the Parks and Recreation Department shall designate a staff member as the City Arborist, and shall authorize such person to perform the duties imposed by and exercise the powers granted by this section. B. Duties. The City Arborist, subject and in addition to the provisions of this chapter and available resources, is hereby authorized to carry out the following duties: 1. Develop, administer and maintain a community forestry management plan and budget. 2. Establish and maintain an inventory of public trees. 3. Establish policies to carry out the provisions of this chapter. 4. Establish and maintain specifications for tree planting on public property. 5. Provide information and advice to citizens and City employees, including Code Enforcement Officers, regarding the health and condition of trees and maintenance necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare. 6. Manage and regulate the planting, maintenance, protection, removal, and replacement of all public trees within city limits The Meridian City Unified Development Code (See Appendices;Appendix B) calls out the terms for new development across the city, as part of these terms there are minimum requirements for vegetative cover and landscape buffers. The responsibilities for the maintenance of the plant materials, including the trees, are stated as such: 11-3B-13: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE: A. Purpose: The regulations of this section are intended to ensure that all required landscaping is maintained in a healthy, growing condition at all times. B. Applicability: The requirement for landscape maintenance applies in all districts where landscaping has been required. C. Standards: 1. Responsibility: The property owner is responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping and screening devices required by this article. 2. Topping Prohibited: Topping any street tree required by this article is prohibited. 3. Tree Grates: Tree grates shall be widened to accommodate the growing tree trunk and prevent girdling of any trees planted in tree wells within sidewalks or other public right of way. 4. Dead and Diseased Plant Materials: Plant materials that exhibit evidence of insect pests, disease, and/or damage shall be appropriately treated to correct the problem. Dead plant materials shall be replaced. 5. Inspections: All landscaping required by this subsection may be subject to periodic inspections by city officials to determine compliance or to investigate. 6. Pruning: The lower branches of trees shall be pruned and maintained at a minimum height of six feet(6') above the ground or walkway surface to afford greater visibility of the area, except as otherwise required herein. (Ord. 12-1514, 5-16-2012, eff. 5-21-2012) (See Appendices for a link to the complete Article of UDC) - Page 326 20 Lem#20. UNITY ENGAGEMENT PARTNERS - URBAN FOREST STAKEHOLDERS Meridian Development Corporation—The City partners with MDC on construction of the Downtown tree planter boxes and their replacement, as well as sharing costs for the construction of new boxes driven by development. City of Meridian Community Development: Community Education/Outreach Volunteer Work Force Programs—with proper education, training, and supervision volunteers are a valuable asset to the City of Meridian. The more a citizen is involved in their community the more sense of ownership and pride they will feel in their town, helping not only to beautify our community, but bring a positive energy to our town through our citizens. Ada County Highway District—The city has a memorandum of understanding with ACHD wherein the city maintains the tree boxes and the trees, mitigates for sidewalk trip hazards and shares the cost with ACHD on some sidewalk and curb repairs that are related to trees in public rights-of-way in the Downtown core geographic area identified in this plan. USDA/ISDA—Meridian Parks and Recreation works closely with the Idaho State Department of Agriculture to comply with Federal standards for the application of Pesticides and develop plans for response and management of Invasive Pests and Plants. Idaho Power—The city partners with Idaho Power Company to host the annual tree distribution events for the Treasure Valley Shade Tree Project, which is a program where Idaho Power purchases small trees and makes them available, free to homeowners to plant on their private properties as long as they promise to plant them in pre-determined locations with the goal of helping to reduce the future energy costs by providing shade for homes and buildings. Idaho Power provides access to a software program that allows homeowners to virtually move a tree around on their property until they find the spot that provides the maximum reduction in energy costs. Meridian participates by hosting the Shade Tree Giveaway events in one of their parks, and the city Arborist helps tree recipients learn and understand how to properly plant and care for the trees to ensure the best"Survival rate" of the trees that are given away. West Ada School District—School properties are diverse landscapes with canopies that contribute to the makeup of the Urban Forest as well. The public schools in Meridian have their own jurisdiction as to tree care, and the city is not responsible for the planting or maintenance of trees on school property. The city regularly works with the school district to celebrate Arbor Day and involve students in those events as a way to provide education and awareness about trees and their benefits. There is an opportunity for the City to work more closely with West Ada School District. Idaho Department of Lands—The Idaho Department of Lands partners with the city to host an annual Arbor Day celebration and provide grants to help cover the cost of the celebrations. Idaho Department of Lands shares their license for the use of Tree Plotter Inventory Software with Meridian which serves to help quantify the benefits directly associated with the trees the city maintains. They also provide a Community Forestry Assistant who offers educational outreach, independent reports on tree valuation, hazard risk assessment, ordinance revision, inventory assistance, and consultation. The Community Forestry Assistant contributed their knowledge, and experience and helped to edit and review this plan. Idaho Nursery and Landscape Association— Meridian maintains status as a member of the Idaho Nursery and Landscape Association, which provides a number of great opportunities for continuing education for all park staff. Local Nurseries—Meridian relies on local nurseries to provide quality planting stock for all of the city park planting projects. The city strives to do business with as many local nurseries as it can without favoring one particular nursery over the other. Business is awarded mainly on an availability factor. Local Landscape Contractors—Meridian Relies upon local Tree and Landscape services to perform all of the work that cannot be performed in house. The city strives to do business with contractors who go above and beyond the duties of professionalism by demonstrating their commitment to, and conforming to Industry Standards that are set by International and National organizations such as the International Society of Arboriculture, Tree Care Industry Association, Idaho Nursery& Landscape Association, P.L.A.N.E.T. etc. The local tree services and landscape companies who obtain and maintain credentials and become certified b Page 327 21 ttem#20. fit Organizations Idaho Botanical Gardens &The Idaho Master Naturalists—The Idaho Botanical Gardens and The Idaho Master Naturalists annually host a series of classes that reach a section of the public that may not ordinarily be targeted or reached by Meridian City efforts. The City Arborist regularly participates in these programs by presenting on requested topics. These classes also serve as a recruiting tool for possible future volunteer projects in Meridian City Parks etc. Treasure Valley Canopy Network—Works with the city to seek potential opportunities for carbon offset credits, and to find options for the repurposing of wood that is generated by tree care. The TVCN also organizes quarterly meetings that bring all surrounding City Foresters together to discuss the matters that are being focused on in their communities. These meetings have proven to be valuable to the city Arborist as the Community Forestry Program continues to evolve. Arbor Day Foundation Tree City USA—the City of Meridian has qualified as a Tree City USA for 18 years. Tree City USA communities benefit both from achieving the necessary requirements to become a Tree City USA, which requires a certain level of commitment and organization on the part of the City and involves community education, and from the status itself. Once designated as a Tree City USA, a community can benefit from increased community pride and stewardship and improved public image. In addition, this designation can be helpful in obtaining grant funding for community forestry projects. The Arbor Day Foundation awards this certification to cities which meet four core standards: • A Tree Board or Department (Some cities use the Parks Department) • A Tree Care Ordinance • A Community Forestry Program With an Annual Budget of at Least$2 Per Capita • An Arbor Day Observance and Proclamation Tree City USA Growth Award—Each year cities can apply for an additional "Growth Award". This program creates an opportunity for participating municipalities to demonstrate their commitment to building and maintaining a robust Urban Forestry Program. This goal is met by accomplishing a variety of different goals that are identified by the Arbor Day Foundation as areas of growth. There are 5 categories, each with a number of different qualifying activities. Communities that achieve these goals are recognized each year by the foundation with an additional Growth Award that can be displayed/shared with the public to foster pride in the city Forestry Program. e w Award Groth TREE CITY USA An Arbor Day Foundoilon Program � Page 328 22 L/te,#20. GEMENT OF THE FOREST RECOMMENDATIONS — GOALS FOR THE DEPARTMENT .tz x aa3 x M-r fv.. car rd.'. ♦ a� "�.. f�+-r�.,. a �.. . i.4 a f a a r The Meridian City Arborist needs to work with ISDA and other adjacent city Community Foresters to develop and adopt an Invasive Pest Management Plan that addresses the impending threat of the Emerald Ash Borer. Having a detailed and comprehensive EAB action plan that is consistent with other surrounding cities and that embraces Plant Health Care and IPM practices will help Meridian proactively manage Ash trees in a systematic manner. Knowing the locations of these trees, which ones have been treated, and which trees need treatment or are considered the highest risk, will be of the utmost importance. Having a completed inventory prior to the arrival of EAB is essential. It is only a matter of time before the Emerald Ash Borer shows up in the Treasure Valley and Meridian. Budget/Funding— In accordance with the criteria for maintaining status as an Arbor Day Foundation recognized Tree City USALMeridian currently has a budget of a minimum of$2/per capita. As the city population continues to expand and the age and condition of the trees within the Urban Forest continue to grow the annual budget will also need to increase to meet and accommodate these changes. As of December 2020, according to the Tree City USA Application Data, the City of Meridian had a total Forestry Budget of$256,024.65. With an estimated population of 106,804 that puts the Meridian Forestry Budget just over the $2 per capita threshold for the Tree City USA requirements. Forestry Staff—The Meridian Urban Forestry Division currently consists of one full time employee identified as the Meridian City Arborist. As the city continues to expand and the Parks system and Urban Canopy evolves and grows, the work load associated with managing this asset will also increase which in turn could also call for a need of additional full- time staff. Additional equipment will also become necessary and would contribute to greater efficiency for in-house staff. Continued Education and Training—Continue to provide and promote opportunities to expand and build on the skill set and knowledge of Forestry staff by sending employees to workshops and educational seminars, and encouraging and enabling staff to pursue professional industry-recognized certifications. Risk Management—Trees in the Meridian City Urban Forest which are identified as a "Risk"through routine or specially requested inspections will be documented, and evaluated using the most current Tree Risk Assessment specifications and standards set forth by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA). Appropriate management actions will be taken in accordance with the resulting recommendations. As part of the goals portion of this plan, Meridian Forestry should develop a more complete "Storm Response Plan"with clear responsibilities defined to encourage cooperation across all city departments in communication, transportation clearance, and utility issues. Page 329 23 Item#20. 4n 4 y MERIDIAN URBAN FORESTRY GOALS AND STRATEGIES The implementation of an effective plan will help in preventing and addressing any challenges brought on by storms, invasive pests, or disease. By following the City's Plan, our trees will be properly selected for the area and maintained properly, resulting in less damage from pests, disease, and broken limbs/downed trees due to severe weather. The Meridian City Arborist will work to accomplish this by developing and following a specific set of guidelines for nursery quality when planting young trees, having the pruning of our urban forest conducted by Certified Arborists, and using best management practices (BMP's)for watering and maintenance techniques for the existing urban forest and its future additions. The following is an itemized list of Objectives and Strategies for the Meridian Forestry Program to work towards achieving. These objectives are tied directly to the Tenets listed earlier on page 8 of this management plan. Each goal listed here has a brief description of the actions that can be taken or strategies that can be implemented in order to accomplish the task successfully. Timeframe to complete is designated as: Short-term (up to 3 years) Mid-term (4-6 years) Long-term (7-10 years) Page 330 24 Item#20. jective 1: Protect— Preserve the existing tree canopy in Meridian Cti • • • . - • fime rame to Cost Budget Impact complete TINJIFEstimate 1.a Tree Mitigation- TBD Staff time Long-term Develop a more robust and diverse system for mitigation of Tree/Canopy loss during develop- ment. Encourage/Incentivize the retention protection and incorporation of mature existing canopy in development among the Meridian Urban Forest. Explore/Develop alternative options for Tree Mitigation where retention is not feasible. Page 331 25 Item#20. jective 2: Expand- Continue to create appropriate spaces for trees to grow to their full potential, and to expand/increase the canopy cover of Meridian's Urban Forest. • Capital Operational to F_ Cost Budget Impact complete Estimate 2.a Build new parks-- The city of Meridian has plans for building addi- tional parks including: 1. Discovery Park Phase 2 TBD N/A Short-term 2. West Meridian Regional Park (Borup) TBD N/A Mid-term 3. Margaret Aldape Park (on the Boise River) TBD N/A Long-term Select tree species that are well suited for the location, work with designers to incorporate more tree-friendly spaces, and work with con- tractors to ensure the planting is done correctly so trees can reach their full potential. Page 332 26 Item#20. UDjective 2: (continued) Expand! Continue to create appropriate spaces for trees to grow to their full potential, and to expand/increase the canopy cover of Meridian's Urban Forest. ActionsCapital Operational Time frame to complete-190 Cost Budget Impact Estimate 2.b Arboretum- Continue to make improvements to the Kleiner TBD Staff time Ongoing Arboretum. TBD Modify irrigation to address the specific watering needs of the trees. Eliminate turf areas and expand bed space to ac- commodate tree needs and companion planting opportunities. Add additional features such as naturalized shrub/perennial beds and large rocks/boulders. 2.c Lakeview Golf Course- $0 Staff time Short-term Conduct inventory of all trees on golf course property. Build a management/ maintenance plan that ad- dresses the plant health care concerns exclusive to the property. Work with golf course personnel to help guide them in the proper care for all trees on the grounds. Page 333 27 Item#20. jective 2: (continued) Expand- Continue to create appropriate spaces for trees to grow to their full potential, and to expand/increase the canopy cover of Meridian's Urban Forest. • ns • . - frameto Cost Budget Impact P Estimate complete 2.d Memorial Tree Planting- Explore a system whereas existing trees in our $p Staff time Short-term parks can be "adopted" and/or new trees can be accepted and planted as a memorial by members of the public. This system has potential for gener- ating additional income for the city that can be used to alleviate expenses associated with the continued costs of maintaining the trees in the program. Care would need to be taken to ensure that this program is executed in a manner that does not result in giving our parks the aesthetic appearance of a "cemetery". Create a numbered mapping system so that any/ all trees in the program can be quickly and effi- ciently identified and located. Page 334 28 Item#20. jective 3: Manage- Continue to find innovative and efficient ways to manage the ex- isting and ever increasing Urban Forest canopy. • -'roperational Time frame to Cost Budget Impact complete Estimate 3.a Inventory Software- Meridian is currently using a "Shared License" $3,000 per yr Short-term for the program it uses for tree inventory. This version has limited tools that are available for the city's use. Meridian should procure their own license for the use of this software, which would open up fea- tures that are currently unavailable. 3.b Tree Planting- Develop an organized, systematic plan for the $0 Staff time Short-term continued planting of trees throughout all parks and properties, including the Arboretum. Page 335 29 Item#20. jective 3: (continued) Manage- Continue to find innovative and efficient ways to manage the ex isting and ever increasing Urban Forest canopy. Actions 0 i rm • • • • . 3.c City Ordinance Update- Review and revise verbiage as necessary within $0 Staff time Short-term the city ordinance text to create consistency and clearly define responsibilities for tree care in vari- ous areas of the city to ensure that tree asset val- ues are protected and can increase whenever possible. 3.d Pruning Cycle- Create an annual process whereby all City Man- $0 Staff time Short-term aged Trees are pruned on a regular schedule, pri- oritizing trees that need the most immediate care. Develop a map of areas to be addressed during each pruning cycle. Page 336 30 Item#20. jective 3: (continued) Manage- Continue to find innovative and efficient ways to manage the ex isting and ever increasing Urban Forest canopy. 3.e Support Public Works'Tree Waste Recycling Pro- gram- $0 Staff time Short-term Provide tree service companies who perform work on City Managed Trees opportunities to de- posit the chips that are generated from their work into a centrally-located collection area where they can later be accessed for use in City parks. Work with local wood workers to see that wood from larger trees removed from our parks and properties can be re-purposed into lumber to be used in special projects. Page 337 31 Item#20. jective 3: (continued) Manage- Continue to find innovative and efficient ways to manage the ex isting and ever increasing Urban Forest canopy. V Downtown Trees $0 Staff time Short-term Explore the maintenance of all street trees on both sides of Main street from Franklin Road to E Fairview Ave. in order to preserve the health, val- ue, benefits, aesthetic quality, and longevity of the mature canopy of Downtown Meridian and to manage hazards to the public that may occur as a result of trees that are not otherwise cared for properly. Create more tree friendly growing spaces to ac- commodate the need for lasting, mature canopy $0 NA Ongoing in Downtown Meridian. Create more diversity in the Downtown tree can- opy by selecting a greater variety of appropriate $0 NA Ongoing species in Downtown plantings. Page 338 32 Item#20. jective 4: Inform- Promote and foster community development by providing education opportunities to the public and employees. • Capital Operational Timeframeto Cost Budget Impact complete Estimate 4.a Arboretum- Continue to build and improve the Self-Guided $0 Staff time Ongoing Tree Walk Tour in the J.M. Kleiner Memorial Park Arboretum. This is a valuable resource for the public, as it helps to inform them of which trees will work well n their own landscapes. Organize guided Interpretive Tree Walks in City Parks and the Arboretum. 4.b Community Education Classes- $0 Staff time Ongoing Establish and maintain a seasonal schedule of classes aimed at helping to educate the public about current and appropriate tree care practic- es. 4.c Brochures/Downloads- $0 Staff time Ongoing Design handouts and articles on tree care for the public. These can be handed out at events and Incidental made available for download from the city web- Printing Costs site. Page 339 33 Item#20. jective 4: (continued) Inform- Promote and foster community development by providing education opportunities to the public and employees. ns Actio rur Capital Operational Time frameto -low Cost Budget Impact complete Estimate 4.d Workshops- Provide opportunities for employees and local $0 Staff time Ongoing tree service workers to build on their professional skills and knowledge. 4.e Volunteer Programs- The current age diversity of trees in the meridian $0 Staff time Ongoing Urban Forest is perfect for working with volun- teers from the public to teach them valuable Tools for skills in tree maintenance. Building/starting a "Tree Steward" Volunteer program would benefit volunteers the community immensely. (Cost TBD) 4.f Enhance Website- $0 Staff time Ongoing Build a better web page for Meridian Forestry. This is a resource that has not yet been devel- oped to the full potential. Page 340 34 Item#20. jective 5: Partnershi s— Continue o build and foster healthy partnerships Actions Operational N&L__ Aid Estimate Budget Impact complete Idaho Power—Continue to work with IP to host $0 Staff time Ongoing and staff the Shade Tree Giveaway Program. ACHD—Work with ACHD to plan for more spaces $0 Staff time Ongoing that are appropriately designed for trees along street buffers. Aim for Quality over Quantity. Treasure Valley Canopy Network& Other Cities— Maintain annual membership to the TVCN and $500 Staff time Ongoing continue to meet with Foresters from other adja- cent cities to exchange ideas and information. Downtown Development—Work with DDC to $0 Staff time Ongoing plan for more appropriate quality spaces for trees in downtown development. USDA/ISDA—Work with the Dept. of Ag to devel- $0 Staff time Ongoing op an action plan for managing and responding to invasive pests like the Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) Arbor Day Foundation—Continue to qualify as a $0 Staff time Ongoing Tree City USA and earn Growth Awards each year. There are many opportunities to continue growing the Meridian Urban Forestry Program in ways that don't cost the city a lot of money, but these activities typically require a fair amount of time invested in accomplishing recognition. CWI/IBG/IDFG/Other Non-Profits—Continue to $0 Staff time Ongoing work with these partners to offer educational op- portunities to students, members of the non- profit clubs, and the public. Local Contractors—Work with local contractors to $0 Staff time Ongoing continue to set a high standard for tree care. Local Business--Partner with local business' i.e. Rocky Mountain Vermeer to organize opportuni- ties for employees & local tree service profes- sionals to build on skills and knowledge. Page 341 35 Item#20. L U S I O N Given the cost of the ongoing maintenance, removal, and replacement of trees, we have created this management program to help protect the investment in our existing urban forest, and to constantly work to expand with healthy additions, in smart ways that make sense for Meridian. With an appropriate maintenance plan for existing and newly planted trees that consists of a plan for proper pruning, watering, replacement choices, and maintenance techniques, the goal is to keep our trees healthy and thriving in a cost-effective manner. There are many areas in which Meridian can grow its Urban Forestry Program without increasing costs. • Continue to build on the current inventory system and use it to a greater extent to manage the workload, contract and in-house. • Build a stronger Tree Mitigation Plan for development that includes a "Tree Mitigation Fund" account. This system could actually generate revenue so the City can then use these funds to help cover the costs of future tree planting and/or help design more tree-friendly spaces in downtown development. • Eastablish a Tree Stewards Volunteer Program to help with the maintenance of juvenile trees throughout the parks system. • Create a wood waste recycling program that encourages the repurposing of wood from trees that are removed from the Urban Forest, which could also provide products that could be used in Meridian city parks. • Build a more robust Urban Forestry website as a resource for the community where they can find information about tree care and how the City of Meridian manages its trees. • Carbon Credits can be a potential source of revenue that has potential to help the City with the ongoing costs of tree maintenance. The City of Meridian is currently exploring these options but has not yet determined if it is a solution it wishes to pursue. • Creating a Memorial/Tree Adoption or"Heritage Tree" Program can also be a way to generate revenue and help manage the costs associated with maintaining trees in the park system. Explore options that would not adversely alter the appearance of our parks. • There is opportunity for working more closely with West Ada School District to expand the Meridian Urban Forest on school properties. • Continue to develop the Arboretum at Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park as an educational resource for the public • Design the spaces for trees in parks and Meridian's Downtown Core in a more efficient manner to allow these valuable resources to reach their full potential. • The City of Meridian needs to work closely with the ISDA in creating an action plan for management of the Emerald Ash Borer. Meridian's City Arborist will continue to explore these options, use the goals defined within this plan, and find new ways to continue to build on the current Urban Forestry Program to make it a stronger, better, and a more valuable resource for the community. Appendices A.) Meridian City Tree Ordinance B.) Meridian City Unified Development Code Article B Landscaping Requirements C.) Meridian City Urban Forest Pruning Maintenance Cycle D.)Tree Planting Specifications E.) Meridian Supplemental List to the Treasure Valley Tree Selection Guide F.)Tree Work Specifications Page 342 36 Item#20. ndix A.) Meridian Forestry Ordinance Meridian City Code section 13-2-11 http://sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/index.php?book_id=306&chapter_id=6523#s5 l 53 6 http://sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/index.php?book_id=306&chapter_id=6523#s5 l 53 8 http://sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/index.php?book_id=306&chapter_id=6523#s5153 9 H 13-2-11: ESTABLISHMENT AND DUTIES OF TE CITY ARBORIST: A. Designation. The Director of the Parks and Recreation Department shall designate a staff member as the City Arborist, and shall authorize such person to perform the duties imposed by and exercise the powers granted by this section. B. Duties. The City Arborist, subject and in addition to the provisions of this chapter and available resources, is hereby authorized to carry out the following duties:http://sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/index.php? book id=306&chapter_id=6523#s51540 Develop, administer and maintain a community forestry management plan and budget. Establish and maintain an inventory of public trees. Establish policies to carry out the provisions of this chapter. Establish and maintain specifications for tree planting on public property. http://sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/index.php?book_id=306&chapter_id=6523#s51542 Provide information and advice to citizens and City employees, including Code Enforcement Officers, regarding the health and condition of trees and maintenance necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare.http://sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/index.php? book id=306&chapter_id=6523#s51543 Manage and regulate the planting, maintenance,protection,removal, and replacement of all public trees within city limits.http://sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/index.php? book id=306&chapter_id=6523#s51544 Meridian City Code section 4-2-1 4-2-1: DEFINITIONS: GRAFFITI: Any inscription, work, figure, symbol, drawing, mark, or design that is marked, etched, scratched, drawn, or painted on any real or personal property or improvement, including,but not limited to, walls, fences, gates,pavement, buildings, rocks, trees, bridges, streets, sidewalks, and/or signs, whether such property is public,private, temporary, or permanent, without the consent of the owner of such property or the owner's authorized agent, and which inscription, work, figure, symbol, drawing, mark, or design is visible from any publicly accessible location. JUNK VEHICLE: Any vehicle, or parts thereof,which: A. Cannot be safely operated under its own power; B. Is missing any one of the following: foot brakes, hand brakes, headlights, taillights, horn, muffler, rearview mirrors, windshield wipers, or adequate fenders; C. Has been declared salvage, or has been physically damaged to the extent that the cost of parts and labor minus the salvage value would make it uneconomical to repair or rebuild such vehicle; or D. Is otherwise in a wrecked,partially dismantled, inoperative, or dilapidated condition. This definition shall not include junk vehicles lawfully stored or parked pursuant to the operation of a lawfully conducted business, industry or commercial enterprise. Page 343 37 NUISANCE: Anything which unreasonably injures or offends the health or senses; obstructs the free passage, comfortable enjoyment, or customary use of public or private property; or creates an actual or potential safety, health, or fire hazard. Nuisances shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following conditions designated as abatable nuisances and as general nuisances: Abatable Nuisance: Nuisance conditions that may be abated by the City in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, specifically including, without limitation, the following nuisance conditions: A. Nuisance weeds. B. Graffiti, on any surface. C. Snow or ice on any public sidewalk abutting or adjoining any privately-owned premises. D. Vegetation, other than trees, that impedes or obstructs a public sidewalk or roadway. E. Nuisance trees General Nuisance: Nuisance conditions that may lead to criminal charges without any prior attempt by the City to obtain abatement thereof, specifically including, without limitation, the following nuisance conditions: A. Nuisance materials on the ground, except that this definition shall not include the incidental leakage of nuisance materials from registered vehicles lawfully moving or parked upon a public right-of-way; the lawful application of pesticides or herbicides for purposes of controlling pests or weeds; or activity otherwise specifically allowed by law or by written permit issued by the City or other governing authority. B. Personal property on any portion of a public sidewalk, except as specifically allowed by law or by written permit issued by the City or other governing authority. C. One or more junk vehicle(s), where such junk vehicle is not enclosed in any structure or otherwise concealed from public view pursuant to title 11 of this Code. D. Stagnant or impure water which causes or creates an offensive, unhealthy, or unsanitary condition. E. Refuse, vegetative decay or any decaying substance, garbage or filth of any kind which is exposed to the elements and which causes or creates an offensive,unhealthy, or unsanitary condition. F. Discarded matter which has no substantial market value, is exposed to the elements, and is not enclosed in any structure or otherwise concealed from public view, including, but not limited to: rubble, litter, asphalt, concrete,plaster, tile, cardboard, paper, scrap wood, scrap metal, tires, broken glass, and/or other dilapidated or deteriorating personal property. G. The accumulation of and/or failure to lawfully dispose of solid waste on any commercial or residential premises. H. Any building or structure that is so dilapidated or is in such condition as to menace the public health or the safety of persons or property due to increased fire hazard or other hazard. I. Any nuisance condition not otherwise enumerated in this chapter. NUISANCE MATERIALS: Hazardous,noxious, dangerous, or offensive materials, including, but not limited to, oil, gasoline, fuel, antifreeze, paint, pesticides, or herbicides. NUISANCE TREE: Any tree or part thereof which, by reason of location or condition: constitutes a hazard to public safety; obstructs the free passage of pedestrian or vehicular traffic; fails to provide a vertical clearance of eight feet (8') over a sidewalk or fourteen feet(14') over a street; obstructs public street lighting; harbors pests or disease. NUISANCE WEEDS: Undesirable plant growth, whether living or dead, which: A. Is over eight inches (8") in height; B. By reason of size, manner of growth, location, or dryness, constitutes a safety, health, or fire hazard to any person,building, improvement, crop, or other real or personal property; C. By reason of size, manner of growth, or location, impedes or obstructs a sidewalk or roadway or any portion thereof, or D. Is designated as a noxious weed by the State of Idaho. This definition shall not include cultivated grasses and pastures, though such vegetation may be declared a nuisance where otherwise appropriate. PUBLIC TREE: Any tree, including roots within the critical root zone, whose trunk is located,partly or in whole, on public property. TREE: Any woody plant. Page saa4 38 Item#20. 2. C. Private property owners shall be responsible for maintaining any and all public trees upon public rights of way adjacent to such private property. Where a public tree is a nuisance tree, the owner of record of the adjacent private property, as reflected on the most recent assessment roll, shall be presumed to be responsible for creating, causing, committing, maintaining, and/or allowing such nuisance. It shall be unlawful for any person to damage, mutilate or destroy any public tree; attach any device or structure to a public tree; or store, spill or dump substances, whether liquid or solid, which may be harmful to any part of a public tree. Section 3. D. Time Period For Abatement: It shall be the duty of the owner, occupier, or person in charge or control of any property where any abatable nuisance exists, to abate such nuisance within five (5) calendar days from the date of personal service, mailing, or publication, except that the Code Enforcement Officer may require summary abatement of an abatable nuisance where such condition presents an imminent or ongoing threat to or impairment of human health or safety. 1. Abatement of graffiti shall meet the following standards: A. The removal of such graffiti shall not follow the pattern of the graffiti such that the inscription,work, figure, symbol, drawing, mark, or design of such graffiti remains apparent. B. The removal of such graffiti by painting over it shall be reasonably similar or identical to the original color of the surface upon which such graffiti was applied. C. If the surface is heavily covered with graffiti, the entire surface shall be repainted. 2. Abatement of a nuisance tree shall include tree removal,pruning, and/or removal of branches, debris, roots, stump, and/or soil, at the direction of the Code Enforcement Officer. Page 345 39 Item#20. dix B. Meridian Unified Development Code Article B Landscaping Requirements https://library.municode.com/id/meridian/codes/code_of ordinances? node Id=TITI1UNDECO CH3REAPALDI ARTBLARE Page 346 40 ndix C.) Current Meridian Pruning Cycle 2020 2023 City Hall West Parking Bear Creek Part Wet House 015 Fire Station 01 Wei House$16 Fire Station 82 Wad Houso#28 Hillsdale Park Downtown Trees(Gen Plaza,City Hall,Parkingl Piny Street Right Of Way Trek Fother ill Palh*ay Seasons Park Fuller Park 1/2(Past 1 of 211 Settlers Park 1/2 12 of 2) Heritage Softba0 F 1ds Kleiner V3 JPart 1 of 3) 2024 Kleiner Arboretum 8Ih St Park Lanark Shop Gordon Harris Park Pier St School Jabal Fields _ South Locust Water Tank Kleiner Park 1/3(Part 3 of 31 Storey Bark Park RenaissarKe Park Waste Water Treatment Plain St Park Witty Dept 2021 ACHO Oram Al ACHD Dram R3 ACHO Dram 44 ACHO Dram RS CentennW Park City Well House 106 Dnscow"Park Fire Safe Houx Fuller Park 1/2 Part 2 of 20 Gem Pia" Htr"s Paris Kleiner Park 1/3(Part 2 of 3) Meridian intercha Split Corridor North Curve Overiend Pumplhouw Tully Park Police& Trainaril Center 2022 Future Srtes Champion Park Aldapt part Chateau Part West Meridian Reg►orwl Flodeo Part Fire SUtilons s3 sa 05 Fire Station 86 Home Court Keith Bird Legacy Rota Humkvy Park Settlers 1/1 (1 of 2) Page 347 41 ndix D.) Tree Planting Specifications Mayor Robert E. fE IDIAN - Simison Treg Bernt Brad Hoaglun Joe Borton Jessica Perrault Luke Cavener Liz Strader MEMORANDUM Tree Planting Specifications Trees are defined in the Treasure Valley Tree Selection Guide by the following groups: Class 1 Trees: Small trees which do not generally reach over 25-30' in height and width. Spacing, 20-30' between trees. Appropriate for under Power Lines or smaller planting areas. Class 2 Trees: Usually considered medium sized trees mostly planted for their shade and excellent use in the landscape and parkway plantings. Reaching 30-40+' height and width. Spacing 30-40' between trees. Class 3. Trees: Many are long lived and attain large height and trunk diameter. Make sure there is ample room to accommodate at maturity. May reach up to 70' + in height and width. Spacing 40-60' between trees. Conifers: Provide year-round greenery, screening and serve as excellent wildlife shelters. Generally, they should not be pruned and will need large growing areas away from buildings, sidewalks, and driveways. Spaces vary with species. Planting stock shall conform to acceptable Tree Stock Standards "Crown Observations" Top of Tree Root Flare shall be exposed & Planted Minimum of 2" above Soil surface All of or as much as possible Burlap and ALL Twine Shall be removed from tree root ball at time of Planting Wire Basket-Top 1/3 of Wire Basket at minimum Shall be removed at time of planting. Tree Shall be Oriented as close to original as possible with paint mark on trunk (if Present) facing North Tree Shall be Planted straight in hole Tree shall not be handled or rocked back and forth by the trunk during planting handling shall be by the root ball as much as possible. A "Watering Berm" shall be formed with the existing soil at Finished Planting created just outside of the original root ball. Should tree require staking, this shall be done in accordance with tree staking specs. Page 348 42 ndix D.2.) Tree Planting Specifications Diagram Notes: Central leader.(See crown 1-Trees shall be of duaGry observations detii)_ prescribed in crown observations and root t observations details and specifications I 2-See specifications for — Root ball surface shall be Whet requirements related to positioned to be this detail one-quarter above finished y grade + -- Prior to mulching,lightly tamp ,}I ,, soil around the root gall in 6" lifts to brace tree Do not over Trunk caliper shall '` 1 J?J/`! compact When the planting meet ANSI Z60 current J`i hole has been badcNled,pour edition for root ball size. t`�G; water around the root ball to settle the sot Root ball modified as _ required Existing sire sod added to create a smooth transition Round-topped from the top of the raised root sod berm 4"high x 8"wide above root bell surface shall ball to the sloshed grade at a be constructed around the 1596 max.slope. rod ball Bean shall begin 4"layer of mulch at root bar periphery. No more than t"of mulch on top of root ball (See specibcahons for mulch) Original grade Finished grade Lr..��r ��i �i 'r' _ti.r.I��- tr�l,C-�� 'r '� :�ri•J,r:�r�,�. +Tr t��fil - �. Bottom of root beg, Oil existing or recompacted soil. Loosened sod and t the 3x widest dimension of root ball I soil to reduce compaction t t o the r SECTION VIEW Existing and depth shown Existing soil- TREE IN POORLY DRAINED SOIL UIFUM TREE FOUNDATION 0=4 P_v OPEN SOURCE MEE TO UK Page 349 43 ndix E.) Meridian Supplemental List to Treasure Valley Tree Selection Guide Recommended Trees for the Meridian Urban Forest Environment The following list includes species that will perform well in the Meridian and greater Boise Bench area where soil conditions have presented challenges for growing trees due to structure and density characteristics, and pH levels. Always be sure to have a Soil Analysis done for the space where you plan to have trees planted on your property. Soil tests are affordable and convenient and will prevent a lot of future problems that can prove to be costly in the long term. There are two main labs in the area that offer affordable tests with results and recommendations that are easy to interpret. Western Labs-211 W Highway 95, Parma, Idaho 83660 208-649-4360 https://westernlaboratories.com/home Stukenholtz Labs-2924 Addison Ave East Twin Falls ID 83301 208-734-305 https://stukenholtz.com/ Recommended for use in ROW (Right of way) Street Buffers Acer-Maples campestre-Hedge Maple ginnala-Amur Maple glabrum- Rocky Mountain Maple (hard to find) grandidentatum-Bigtooth Maple-Highland Park, Mesa Glow, Rocky Mountain Glow griseum-Paperbark Maple miyabei- Miyabei Maple Rugged Ridge Maple,State Street Maple negundo- Boxelder'Sensation' platanoides- Norway Maple(use with caution,sensitive to hot dry conditions highly susceptible to Verticillium Wilt) pseudoplatanus-Sycamore Maple rubrum-Red Maple NOT RECOMMENDED intolerant of Alkaline/high pH soils saccharinum-Silver Maple NOT RECOMMENDED subject to decay and branch failures saccharum-Sugar Maple(can also be sensitive to High pH Alkaline soils) truncatum-Shantung Maple truncatum x platanoides(hybrids)Crimson Sunset, Pacific Sunset, Urban Sunset Aesculus-Buckeye/Horsechestnut(often bearing large fruit, although not typically that messy) glabra-Ohio Buckeye flava-Yellow Buckeye hippocastanum-Horsechestnut Alnus-Alders glutinosa-Common Alder cordata-Italian Alder spaethii-Spaeth's Alder Amelanchier-Serviceberry arborea- Downy Serviceberry alnifolia-Saskatoon Serviceberry X grandiflora-Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry Page 350 44 Betula-Birch nigra-River Birch (can be sensitive to Alkaline/High pH conditions) Carpinus-Hornbeam betulus-European Hornbeam caroliniana-American Hornbeam Catalpa-Northern Catalpa speciosa-Northern Catalpa Celtis-Hackberry occidentalis-Common Hackberry reticulata-Netleaf Hackberry Cercidiphyllum-Katsura (sensitive to hot dry conditions,susceptible to sunscald) japonicum- Cercis-Redbud canadensis- Eastern Redbud occidentalis-Western redbud Chionanthus-Fringe Tree retusus-Chinese Fringe Tree virgincus-White Fringe Tree Cladrastis-Yellowwood (can be sensitive to transplant and sunscald) kentuckea-American Yellowwood lutea-(now synonymous with kentuckea) Cornus-Dogwood florida- Flowering Dogwood kousa- Kousa Dogwood mas-Corneliancherry-'Saffron Sentinel', 'Golden Glory'An excellent and under-appreciated, under-used tree highly recommended Corylus-Filbert americana-American Filbert avellana-European Filbert colurna-Turkish Filbert(can sometimes bear large heavy fruit,though not typically messy) Cotinus-Smoke Tree coggygria-Common Smoketree obovatus-American Smoketree Crataegus-Hawthorn crusgalli-Cockspur Hawthorn douglasii-Douglas Hawthorn laevigata- English Hawthorn X lavallei-Lavalle Hawthorn phaenopyrum-Washington Hawthorn viridis-Green Hawthorn 'Winter King' Diospyros-Persimmon virginiana-Common Persimmon Page 351 45 LftL-_#20. _Beech grandifolia-American Beech (NOT RECOMMENDED) sylvatica-European/Common Beech Fraxinus-Ash NOT RECOMMENDED due to high density,Emerald Ash Borer,Aphids&Lilac Ash Borer americana-White Ash angustifolia-Narrowleaf Ash (Especially prone to Lilac Ash Borer) excelsior-European Ash pennsylvanica-Green Ash Ginkgo(be sure to choose a fruitless male cultivar)Slow growing,generally more expensive at nurseries due to the slow production and lack of availability Biloba (Magyar,Autumn Gold, Princeton Sentry) Gleditsia-Honeylocust(beware of varieties that produce seeds)Now OVERUSED in the area triacanthos var. inermis-Thornless Common Honeylocust 'Suncole'-Sunburst Honeylocust NOT RECOMMENDED Prohibited in R.O.W.Street tree planting Gymnocladus-Kentucky Coffee Tree dioicus-('Espresso' is a seedless variety) Juglans-Walnut nigra-Black Walnut(CAUTION) Not permitted for ROW Street Tree planting regia-Common English Walnut(CAUTION) Not permitted for ROW Street Tree planting Koelreuteria-Goldenraintree paniculata-Goldenraintree Liquidambar-Sweetgum(can be sensitive to Alkaline/High pH Soils) styraciflua-American Sweetgum (produce a seed that is commonly thought of as undesirable,and can cause branch failures during heavy set years) Liriodendron tulipifera-Tulip Tree/Yellow Poplar Maackia amurensis-Amur Maackia Maclura pomifera-Osage Orange Magnolia- acuminate-Cucumber Magnolia grandifolia-Evergreen Magnolia (CAUTION) X soulangiana-Saucer Magnolia stellata-Star Magnolia Malus spp. Flowering Crabapple(many varieties produce messy fruit, and have low branching) Metasequoia glyptostroboides-Dawn Redwood (Can be sensitive to Alkaline/High pH Soils) Morus alba-White/Common Mulberry(fruit can be messy) Page 352 46 Item#20. a sylvatica-Black Tupelo* (shows promise but can be sensitive to Alkaline/High pH Soils) Ostrya virginiana-American Hophornbeam/Ironwood Parrotia persica-Persian Parrotia Phellodendron amurense-Amur Corktree Platanus-Sycamore/Planetree x acerifolia- London Planetree occidentalis-American Planetree/Sycamore Populus-Cottonwood/Poplar JCAUTION highly aggressive surface roots can render a landscape space unusable,and soft wood is subject to decay) Prohibited in Public ROW alba-White/Silver-leaved Poplar angustifolia balsamifera-Balsam Poplar deltoides-Eastern Cottonwood nigra 'italica'-Lombardy Poplar tremuloides-Quaking Aspen (NOT RECOMMENDED) trichocarpa-(this is the species that is Native to the Boise River Basin) x canadensis-Carolina Poplar Prunus-Plum,Cherry,Chokecherry,Peaches,Almonds,Apricots cerasifera-Cherry Plum (recommended variety=Krauter Vesuvius) padus-Common Birdcherry serotina-Black Cherry serrulata-Flowering Cherry virginiana-Chokecherry(Canada Red,Schubert)often produces suckers from graft.Sucker Punch° is a listed as a "Sucker Free"variety. Pyrus-Flowering Pear(acute branch attachments can lead to poor structure subject to failures) Calleryana (Caution* many cultivars available ranging in habit from upright to pyramidal or rounded. Known to have poor branch structure prone to failure. Many varieties produce messy fruit. Highly susceptible to Fire Blight) Quercus-Oak acutissima-Sawtooth Oak pH sensitive alba-White Oak pH sensitive bicolor-Swamp White Oak imbricaria-Shingle Oak macrocarpa-Bur Oak muehlenbergii-Chinkapin Oak nutallii- Nuttall Oak(greater variety of pH) palustris-Pin Oak(NOT RECOMMENDED highly sensitive to Alkaline/High pH Soils) prinus-Chestnut Oak robur- English Oak rubra- Northern Red Oak shumardii-Shumard Oak(greater variety of pH) Page 353 47 Rhus typhina-Staghorn Sumac(Will grow in neglected areas) (Plant this species with caution,these trees can/will colonize and take over a garden space) Robinia pseudoacacia-Black Locust (Not recommended for home landscape, prohibited for R.O.W. use) These trees will grow in the toughest,and most neglected site conditions.Can form thickets of sucker growth and become invasive.These trees are highly susceptible to Black Locust Borer which can lead to dieback and extensive structural damage. Salix-Willow(Not recommended for home landscape prohibited for R.O.W. use) Although this tree can be popular for the Picturesque and nostalgic imagery it brings to mind,this tree is notoriously messy constantly dropping branches,aphid and cottony scale issues and poor branch structure that often leads to failures. Sophora japonica-Pagodatree(styphnolobium japonicum)Summer flowers, messy fruit Synonymous with Styphnolobium japonicum Syringa reticulata-Japanese Tree Lilac'Ivory Silk' Tilia-Linden americana-American Linden/Basswood cordata-Littleleaf Linden tomentosa-Silver Linden Ulmus-Elm (some varieties can have a lot of disease/insect issues, use hybrids with resistance) americana-American Elm japonica x wilsoniana 'Morton'AccoladeTm Elm japonica x pumila—'New Horizon' Elm 'Morton Glossy'—Triumph T"" Elm parvifolia-Allee°&Chinese Elm Bosque'" Lacebark Elm Zone 6, may not be hardy in severe winter procera-English Elm propinqua- Emerald Sunshine° Elm pumila-Siberian Elm (this tree is a weed,do not allow it to develop on your property) wilsoniana—'Prospector' Prospector Elm Zelkova serrata-Zelkova (Village Green,Green Vase,Wireless) The following species should be considered as WEEDS and not permitted to grow or develop on your property: Eleagnus angustifolia- Russian Olive Ailanthus altissima-Tree of Heaven Ulmus pumila-Siberian Elm Page 354 48 Item#20. Conifers Abies-Fir Concolor White/Concolor Fir Calocedrus decurrens California Incense Cedar Cedrus True Cedar atlantica deodara Chamaecyparis lawsoniana Lawson's Cypress Cupressus nootkatensis-Alaskan Cedar Juniperus-Juniper Communis-Common Juniper Occidentalis-Western Juniper Osteosperma-Utah Juniper Scopulorum- Rocky Mountain Juniper Picea-Spruce abies-Norway Spruce glauca-White Spruce var densata Black Hills Spruce pungens Colorado Spruce glauca Colorado Blue Spruce Pinus-Pine Aristata Bristlecone Pine Contorta/latifolia-Lodgepole Pine Densiflora umbraculifera Tanyosho Pine Flexilis Limber Pine'Vanderwolf's Pyramid' Held rechii/leucodermis Bosnian Pine Mugo(standard) Nigra Austrian Pine(much over-used,try something different) Ponderosa- Ponderosa Pine Strobiformis Strobus Sylvestris-Scotch Pine Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir Sequoiadendron giganteum Giant Sequoia Taxodium distichum Bald Cypress Thuia plicata Western Red Cedar,occidentalis Arborvitae/White Cedar List Prepared by: Matthew Perkins I City Arborist City of Meridian I Parks and Recreation 33 E. Broadway Ave., Suite 206, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208.888.3579 1 Mobile: 208.371.1755 1 Fax: 208.898.5501 Page 355 49 ndix F.1 .) Tree Work Specifications Mayor Robert E. Simison E I D IAN� Joe Berntorlon Brad erne un Joe Borton Jessica Perreault D A H O Luke Cavener Liz Strader Pruning Specifications Contracted Tree Services shall be responsible for pedestrian and vehicular safety and control within and about the work site, and obtain all permits and bonds required by such regulating agencies, and shall provide all necessary warning devices, barricades, signage, and ground personnel needed to give safety, protection, and warning to persons and vehicular traffic within the area in accordance with the Manual on Federal Uniform Traffic Control Device Standards (M.U.T.C.D.) and as approved by Ada County Highway District, and Idaho Dept. of Transportation. All ANSI Z133 Safety standards shall be adhered to. All equipment to be used and work to be performed must be in full compliance with all standards set forth by O.S.H.A., A.N.S.I., and N.I.O.S.H. Hazardous Material Spills-The permitted Tree Service shall be responsible for appropriate and immediate response to Hazardous Material Spills, including containment, cleanup, and notifying all appropriate agencies. All equipment, tools, wood, trimmings, brush, wood chips or any other form of debris shall be removed by the tree service as well as having the area swept clean of all materials related to the work operation at the end of each working day, unless otherwise specified by work order. Climbing spurs shall not be used unless tree is being removed. The Contractor (Staff) is expected to consistently display a thorough knowledge of strong and weak branching structure, as well as the proper pruning techniques that are used in order to improve branching structure. The extent of pruning will vary depending on species, and the current size and age of the tree. No more than 25% of live healthy canopy should be removed at one time. Pruning shall consist of Crown Cleaning, Crown Raising, and Crown Restoration. All pruning shall be performed in accordance with the latest edition of American National Standards Institute (ANSI) A300 Standard Practices. Juvenile Tree Pruning- The primary objective of Juvenile Tree Pruning is to develop a strong branching structure throughout the canopy that is appropriate for the Urban Environment and to improve the potential for good tree health. Pruning specifications are the same as Crown Cleaning and Crown Raising described herein. Often branch structure is of particular importance with this size tree. (1 of 3 Pages) Page 356 50 ndix F.1 .) Tree Work Specifications Structural Pruning- Shall consist of removing or reducing branches to develop a strong branching structure throughout the canopy for the long term. Targeting of branches for removal or reduction that will include "Co-Dominant Leaders", Branches with "Included Bark", Crossing and Rubbing Branches, and upright branches that have the potential to compromise tree structure or health (see ANSI A300 4.22, Interfering branches). Low branches that are considered "Temporary Branches" shall be pruned off to the extent that allows for a Desired Permanent Branching structure to be established at a point that is appropriate for the site the tree is growing in. It is recognized that some trees will not yet have reached a size that allows for the removal of all temporary branches. Crown Cleaning (ANSI A300 5.6.1)-Shall consist of the selective removal of branches one inch and larger at the point of attachment which are dead, dying, damaged, decayed, diseased, weak, crossing, poorly structured, interfering with structures and/or street lights, stubbed, or otherwise considered hazardous or undesirable for the tree. No "Lions Tailing" (ANSI A300 4.27 and 5.5.7) or unnecessary thinning shall be done. "Thinning" (ANSI A3005.6.2) is necessary only for structural or tree health considerations. Known areas of excessive decay or poor structure that have a high risk of failure shall be pruned out or reduced back to appropriate living tissue consistent with ANSI Standards. Incomplete Crown Cleaning, i.e.; Not Pruning out previously described branches, will be considered incorrect pruning and not in accordance with these specifications. Crown Raising (ANSI A300 5.6.3) - Shall consist of the removal of lower branches of a tree over the street and sidewalk (including in parking lots) in order to provide clearance for vehicular or pedestrian traffic. Generally, clearance for larger trees will be 14 feet or more over the street and 8 feet over sidewalks while also providing an acceptable visual balance of the entire lower canopy. Trees in Parks, will require clearance for Lawnmowers and other equipment up to 8 feet. Smaller trees which cannot be pruned up to 14 feet over the street are to be pruned to establish as much clearance as possible while maintaining the natural character, structure and visual balance of the canopy. Crown Restoration- in the event that a tree has been previously topped, headed or otherwise damaged Crown Restoration may be necessary. Restoration pruning shall establish, and /or retain as much as possible, the natural, strong structure of the tree. NO TOPPING- or similar cutting shall be done at any time. No Heading cuts shall be made, no exceptions. Instead, Reduction cuts should be used to reduce the weight of heavy or weak branches. Other types of pruning- shall be done in accordance with ANSI A300 Standards including "Crown Reduction" (ANSI A300 5.6.4) and "Specialty Pruning" (ANSI A300 5.7) and at the sole discretion of the Meridian City Arborist. (2 0 Page 357 51 ndix F.1 .) Tree Work Specifications Tree Stump Removal Specifications Tree stumps are to be ground out completely with appropriate equipment, to a minimum depth of Twenty Five (25) Inches below grade (unless otherwise specified or agreed upon in writing) to sufficiently accommodate the planting of a large "Balled and Burlapped" (B&B) tree in the same location as the tree stump. Roots must be completely separated from the stump and adjacent roots to a size of no more than 3 inches in diameter. All surface roots greater than 2 inches in diameter must be removed. The hole resulting from the stump removal shall be backfilled with the grinding material or soil to a level of two (2) to three (3) inches above the grade to allow for settling. All excess material must be removed from the site and the entire area should be completely cleaned of debris and dirt. Any damage caused by stump removal operations must be repaired by the contractor at contractor's expense and to the satisfaction of the governing authority (i.e. Meridian Parks and Rec) as soon as possible. In the event that damage is not found until a later date, the contractor may still be held liable for repairs. The contractor will be required to return to the site to correct any conditions that do not meet the above specifications. The Contractor is responsible for all necessary permits, DigLines, (Utility Locates) and traffic control at contractor's expense unless otherwise noted on work order. The Contractor is responsible for all necessary safeguards to protect people and property from damage. Entry into Park Properties must be scheduled with Parks Dept. personnel as indicated on Stump Removal Work Order. The contracted Tree Service agrees that all work shall be performed by, or under the direct supervision of skilled and qualified ISA Certified Arborists who are familiar with these specifications, and it shall be the sole responsibility of the tree service to see that these specifications are adhered to. (3 0 Page 358 52 OW -�-- E IDIAN*-- IDAHO A Publication of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 206 Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: 208-888-3579 recreation@meridiancity.org www.meridiancity.org/parks