The URL can be used to link to this page

Z - Signed Findings Item#1. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI DIAN:-, AND DECISION& ORDER p,. In the Matter of the Request for Annexation of 40.30-Acres of Land with R-40(13.04-Acres)and C- C (27.25-Acres)Zoning Districts for The 10 at Meridian,by J-U-B Engineers,Inc. Case No(s). H-2021-0025 For the City Council Hearing Dates of: June 22, and July 13,2021 (Findings on July 27,2021) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 13, 2021, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 13, 2021, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 13, 2021, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 13,2021, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title I I Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019, Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 13,2021, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR THE 10 AT MERIDIAN—AZ H-2021-0025 - I - Page 4 Item#1. reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for annexation and zoning is hereby approved with the requirement of a Development Agreement per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of July 13, 2021, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement.Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of July 13,2021 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR THE 10 AT MERIDIAN—AZ H-2021-0025 -2- Page 5 Item#1. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 27th day of July 2021. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison 7-27-2021 Attest: Chris Johnson 7.27.2021 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 7-27-2021 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR THE 10 AT MERIDIAN—AZ H-2021-0025 -3- Page 6 Item#1. EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY N -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT D A H O HEARING June 22,2021 Legend DATE: - Prajeci Lcou-Run 4 TO: Mayor&City Council = • FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner L 208-884-5533 - SUBJECT: H-2021-0025 " IM - The 10 at Meridian—AZ LOCATION: 75 S. Ten Mile Rd. at the southwest corner of W. Franklin Rd. and S. Ten Mile Rd.,in the NE 1/4 of Section 15, --_ Township 3N.,Range 1W. 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant requests annexation of 40.30 acres of land with R-40(13.04-acres)and C-C(27.25-acres) zoning districts. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 40.30-acres now Future Land Use Designation Mixed Use Commercial(22+/-acres);High Density Residential(11+/-acres);Mixed Use Residential(3+/-acres) Existing Land Use 1h& Undeveloped agricultural land Proposed Land Use Mixed use(residential/commercial) Current Zoning RUT in Ada County Proposed Zoning R-40(High-Density Residential)(13.04-acres)and C-C (Community Business)(27.25-acres) Neighborhood meeting date;#of 3/29/2021;no attendees other than property owner attendees: History(previous approvals) None Page 1 Page 7 Item#1. B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) No • Requires ACHD Commission No Action es/no Access(Arterial/Collectors/State Two(2)accesses are proposed via Franklin Rd.,two(2) Hwy/Local)(Existing and Proposed) accesses are proposed via Ten Mile Rd.,and one(1)access is proposed via Cobalt Dr. Fire Service No comments were submitted. Police Service See comments in Section IX.D. Wastewater Distance to Sewer Services Adjacent to parcel Sewer Shed South Black Cat trunkshed Estimated Project Sewer See application ' ERU's WRRF Declining Balance 14.14 Project Consistent with WW Yes Master Plan/Facility Plan Impacts/Concerns None Water Distance to Water Services Adjacent to parcel Pressure Zone 2 Estimated Project Water See application ERU's Water Quality None Project Consistent with Water Yes Master Plan Impacts/Concerns None Page 2 Page 8 Item#1. C. Project Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map (fLegend ■ (fLegend ■ Prajeci Lcca-iior I Project Laca�ion Aked-H Ig. s• Densrh k idMidi rr igh [ iid 4 4j c o "r MU-Res IMU Zoning Map Planned Development Map L-40�R'-•8 � Legend RUT Legend 10Pralec Lacairor R Pro"eat Laca=or ��kx c�--w crry umm -- -- RUT — Planned Para e a r RUT L R1 R= -N R-15 G- friff" pAR 4 :2RUT R-40 C-C H-E III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Wendy Shrief,J-U-B Engineers,Inc.—250 S. Beechwood Ave., Ste. 201,Boise,ID 83709 B. Owner: Erik Pilegaard,Elk Ventures,LLC—5137 Golden Foothills Parkway, Ste. 100, El Dorado, CA 95762 Page 3 Page 9 Item#1. C. Representative: Same as Applicant IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper notification published in newspaper 4/30/2021 6/4/2021 Radius notification mailed to property owners within 300 feet 4/27/2021 6/2/2021 Public hearing notice sign posted 5/7/2021 6/9/2021 on site Nextdoor posting 4/27/2021 6/2/2021 V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS LAND USE: The majority of this property is designated Mixed Use Commercial(MU-COM) (northeast 22+/- acres)and High Density Residential(HDR) (southwest 11+/-acres)on the Future Land Use Map(FLUM)in the Comprehensive Plan with a narrow sliver of Mixed Use Residential(MU-RES) (3+/-acres) along the southern boundary which will mostly be right-of-way for W. Cobalt Dr. This property is located within the area governed by the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (TMISAP). The purpose of the MU-COM designation is to encourage the development of a mixture of office,retail, recreational, employment,and other miscellaneious uses,with supporting multi-family or single-family attached residential uses(see pg. 3-9 in the TMISAP for more information). HDR designated areas are multiple-family housing areas where relatively larger and taller apartment buildings are the recommended building type. HDR areas should include a mix of housing types that achieve an overall average density target of at least 16-25 dwelling units per gross acre(see pg. 3-7 in the TMISAP for more information). The purpose of the MU-RES designation is to encourage a diversity of compatible land uses that may include a mixture of residential,office,retail,recreational, employment, and other miscellaneous uses(see pg. 3-8 in the TMISAP for more information). Mixed use designated areas in the TMISAP are recommended locations for development of activity centers that are specifically planned to include both residential and non-residential uses.Mixed use areas are anticipated to have 3 or more significant income producing uses(i.e. retail, office,residential and lodging facilities)with significant functional and physical integration in conformance with a coherent plan(pgs. 3-7 &3-8). The site is proposed to develop with a mix of uses(horizontal and vertical)as shown on the conceptual development plan in Section VIII.B. High-density 4-story multi-family residential apartments (380 1-and 2- bedroom units) are proposed in the HDR&MU-RES designated portions of the site with 3-story multi- family flats(137 1-and 2-bedroom units)and townhouse style(24 3-bedroom units)units with a clubhouse/recreation center [14,000 square feet(s.£)], 3-story vertically integrated mixed use [primarily retail uses on the 15t floor(20,025 s.£)with residential(42 1-and 2-bedroom units)on the 2"d and 3'floors] and single-story financial institution(5,000 s.f.),mixed use service retail buildings (52,775 s.£)and restaurants (9,250 s.£)with drive-throughs with 2-story office buildings (46,600 s.£)proposed in the MU- COM designated portion of the site adjacent to Franklin and Ten Mile Roads. A total of 559 residential units and 147,650 s.f. of commercial uses are proposed to develop in the overall site. Page 4 Page 10 Item#1. Staff finds the mix of income producing uses proposed as well as the vertical and horizontal integration of such uses and residential densities interconnected by pedestrian walkways and amenities is generally consistent with the goals of the TMISAP for this area. Transportation: Cobalt Drive is proposed to be extended as a collector street from S. Ten Mile Rd. at the southeast corner and along the southern boundary of the site consistent with the Master Street Map in the Comprehensive Plan and the Transportation System Map in the TMISAP. The proposed collector street network approved with the annexation of the Janicekproperty to the south (AZ-11-001, DA Inst. #112073616)depicts the extension of Cobalt as proposed with this application with the western segment lying off-site on the adjacent property to the south. Design: Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the multi-family residential structures and the associated clubhouse building. The design of the proposed multi-family structures appear to be of a high quality and are generally consistent in style,materials and colors. Elevations weren't submitted for the commercial portion of the development as tenants are unknown at this time. Final design of the site and all structures is required to comply with the design elements of the TMISAP per the Application of Design Elements matrix on pg.3-49 of the TMISAP and the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual. The commercial portion of the development should incorporate similar design elements,colors and materials as the residential portion of the development. Goals,Objectives, &Action Items: Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this application and apply to the proposed use of this property(staff analysis in italics): • "Encourage a variety of housing types that meet the needs, preferences, and financial capabilities of Meridian's present and future residents."(2.01.02D) A variety of multi family housing is proposed in this development consisting of flats, townhome and apartment style units, which will contribute to the variety of housing types in the City, specifically in the Ten Mile area as desired, that should cater to different financial capabilities. • "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and urban services at the time of final approval, and in accord with any adopted levels of service for public facilities and services."(3.03.03F) City water and sewer services are available and can be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. • "Locate higher density housing near corridors with existing or planned transit,Downtown, and in proximity to employment centers."(2.01.01H) The site is located at a major intersection along two major mobility arterials (Franklin and Ten Mile Roads) and in close proximity to employment centers. Transit services exist in the Ten Mile Crossing development to the east at the intersection of Vanguard/Wayfinder to serve this area—other transit stops may be added in the future. • "Encourage and support mixed-use areas that provide the benefits of being able to live, shop, dine, play, and work in close proximity,thereby reducing vehicle trips, and enhancing overall livability and sustainability."(3.06.02B) The proposed project with multi family residential and a grocery store with nearby employment (retail/office uses) and restaurant uses, should provide a good mix of uses that residents won't have to travel far for, thus reducing vehicle trips and enhancing overall livability and sustainability. • "Slow the outward progression of the City's limits by discouraging fringe area development;encourage development of vacant or underutilized parcels currently within City limits."(4.05.03B) Page 5 Page 11 Item#1. This property is an enclave surrounded by City annexed land. Annexation and development of this property will maximize public services. • "Annex lands into the corporate boundaries of the City only when the annexation proposal conforms to the City's vision and the necessary extension of public services and infrastructure is provided." (3.03.03) The proposed development plan is generally conisistent with the City's vision for this property through the Comprehensive Plan; the developer will extend public services and infrastructure as needed for the development. VI. STAFF ANALYSIS A. ANNEXATION&ZONING The Applicant proposes to annex 40.30 acres of land with R-40 (13.04-acres)and C-C (27.25-acres) zoning districts. A conceptual development plan was submitted as shown in Section VIII.B that proposes offices, a financial establishment,retail pads, a grocery store,vertically integrated residential and multi- family residential in accord with the associated MU-COM,HDR and MU-RES,FLUM designations for the property. A phasing plan was not submitted;however,the Applicant states the 3-story flats and townhome style multi-family residential and clubhouse would develop in the first phase along with the associated infrastructure;the 4-story high-density multi-family would follow with the commercial last as tenants commit. The proposed C-C zoning district is listed as a possible zoning choice in the MU-COM and MU-RES; and the R-40 zoning district is listed as the best choice in the HDR and possible choice in the MU-RES FLUM designation,per the Zoning District Compatability Matrix in the TMISAP(pgs. 2-4 &2-5). The Kennedy Lateral bisects this site and is proposed to be tiled in certain areas and left open in others as shown on the conceptual development plan. The UDC (11-3A-6B.3)required all laterals crossing or lying within the area being developed to be piped or otherwise covered unless left open and used as a water amenity or linear open space as defined in UDC 11-1A-1. The decision making body may waive the requirement for covering such lateral if it finds that the public purpose requiring such will not be served and public safety can be preserved. A waiver from Council is requested for portions of the lateral proposed to be left open; if not approved,the lateral is required to be piped. Access to the site is proposed as shown on the conceptual development plan in Section VIII.B.ACHD has reviewed the proposed accesses and supports the following: Access A full access;Access B— right-in/right-out only; Access C—right-out only;Access D—right-in/right-out only; and Cobalt—right- in/right-out/left-in only. Staff recommends access is restricted through the Development Agreement as supported by ACHD per the comments in Section IX.K. Page 6 Page 12 Item#1. 0 OUR Ro.3o 4b `- a r# F�_. ry ■ h F d b 7. lip AI r aRNE r w.r Off-street parking is depicted on the concept plan to serve the mixed use development. Based on(291) 1- bedroom units, (250)2-and 3-bedroom units and 42 vertically integrated residential units,a minimum of 979 spaces consisting of 541 covered spaces and 396 uncovered spaces are required per UDC Table 11- 3C-6; a total of 1,034 spaces are depicted. Based on 138,400 s.f. of non-residential uses, a minimum of 277 spaces are required per UDC 11-3C-6B.1 and based on 9,250 s.f. of restaurant uses,a minimum of 37 spaces are required per UDC 11-4-3-49A.1, for a total of 314 spaces; a total of 448 spaces are proposed in excess of the minimum standards. The proposed annexation area is contiguous to City annexed property and is within the Area of City Impact Boundary.A legal description and exhibit map for the annexation area is included in Section VIII.A. The City may require a development agreement(DA) in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. To ensure the site develops as proposed with this application, Staff recommends a DA is required as a provision of annexation (see provision in Section IX.A). VII. DECISION A. Staff- Staff recommends approval of the proposed Annexation&Zoning with the requirement of a Development Agreement per the provisions in Section IX in accord with the Findings in Section X. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard this item on May 20,2021.At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ request. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Wendy Shrief,JUB Engineers; Lane Borges;Hethe Clark b. In opposition:None c. Commenting. Cody Black(representing property owner directly to the south) d. Written testimony: Cody Black; Wendy Shrief,JUB Engineers testimony: Cody Black; Wendy JUB En i e. Staffpresentingapplication: Sonya Allen Allen f. Other Staff Staff commenting None 2. Keyissue(s��ublic testimony: Page 7 Page 13 Item#1. a. The property owner to the south requests the western portion of Cobalt Dr.be located on the subject property and not on their property. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. The location and alignment of Cobalt Dr. to the west. b. Opinion that too much residential may be proposed—that the northern"flats" should be converted to commercial. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. outstanding issues for City Council: a. The Applicant requests a waiver to UDC 11-3A-6B.3 for portions of the Kennedy Lateral,which bisects this site,to remain open and not be piped. C. The Meridian City Council heard this item on June 22 and July 13,2021. At the public hearing, the Council moved to approve the subject AZ request. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Wendy Shrief: Hethe Clark: Lane Borges: Eric Pilegaard b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: JoAnn Butler(representing property owner to the south): Denise LaFever d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen and Bill Parsons f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Nary 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Preference for the western portion of Cobalt Dr.to be located on the subject property or at least on the shared property: b. Various concerns noted by Ms. LaFever(see minutes). 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Concern there's too much residential proposed,desire for more commercial uses to be provided. b. Proposed accesses via Franklin&Ten Mile Roads: C. Would like to see a better integration of open space within the overall multi-family development(i.e. south side of the Kennedy Lateran d. Extension of Cobalt Dr. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation. a. Modification to condition#A.Id in Section IX to require the property to be subdivided prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the development. b. City Council approved a waiver to UDC 11-3A-6B.3a to allow certain sections of the Kennedy Lateral to remain open as proposed. C. Added a DA provision that prior to submission of the preliminary plat,the applicant shall provide a written agreement with the property owner of parcel#S 1215131400 on the extension of W. Cobalt Dr. Page 8 Page 14 Item#1. VIII. EXHIBITS A. Annexation&Zoning Legal Description and Exhibit Map EXHIBIT DESmrmm FoR THE 10 AT MERIDIAN CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNE?iATION The NF1M of the NE114 of Section 16, T_3N., R.iW., S.M., City of Meridian, Ada Count+, Idaho more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at NE corner of said Section 15 from which the NI14 corner of said Section 15 bears North 89°1523"West, 2640.72 feet. thence along the East boundary line of said Section 15 South 09°33'16"VOM, 1,329.09 feet to the N 111 a corner of said Section 15; thence along the South boundary line of the NE114 of the NIS114 of said Section 15 North W 15'02"West_ 1,321.1.8 feel lu Li it NE1110 oaf said Suutiuo 1 S. the,nc�:along the West boundary line of Nrz114 of the NEi14 of said Section 15 North OW35722' East, 1.328.96 feet to the E1116 comer of said Section 15-1 thence along the North boundary Ilne of said Section 15 South 8V1513"East, 1,320.37 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING, Containing 40.30 acres, more or less, 7729 DU moo' a 04� Page 9 Page 15 +m q. $s OF SEARM lO ill Ap± " 2mJ2 sis s�4 SRO 1/4 E1 S W. FRANKLIN RD. s15 i a ' Se9qƒF3' 1 G!y � � . ma § \ � s 9 175533 s£ ; z u 40-30 IE w \ S � � z , NE 1/16 N s'? -02 , 1,I N ] M4 SCALE , 0 7729 I 0 1�0 O boa Page 10 Pgea Item#1. EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION FOR THE 10 AT MERIDIAN CITY OF MERIDIAN ZONE (;re A portion of land located in the NE114 of the NE14 of Section 15, T.3N„ R,IW. B,M„ C Ity of Merldi an, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows, BEGINNING at NE comer of said Section 15 from which the N1/4 corrwof said section 15 bears North 88°152Y'West, 2W.72 feet, thence along the East boundary line of said gection 15 South 001STI6"West, 1.329.09 feet to the N 1116 corner of said Section 161 thence along the South boundary line of the NE114 of the NE114 of said Section 15 North 99"15'02" West, 20.27 feet; thence leaving said South boundary line North 57°g6'08"West, 149.94 feet: thence Worth 60"22'90"West, 293-40 feet; thence North 66"00'44"West, 371.54 feet; thence 131.19 feet along the arc of curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 500.00 feet, a central angle of 1b"02'00"and a Iong chord which bears North ,M'91'44"West, 130 81 fit: thence North 42"58'44"West, 723.60 feet to a point on the West boundary line- of NE114 of the NE1l4 of said Section 15: thence along said West boundary line Forth 04°35'2 "East, 310.05 feet to the E1116 corner of said Sedan 15,' thence along the Forth boundary line of said Section 15 South Sol'15'23" East. 1,320.37 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, Containing 27,25 acres, more or less. I77 wG,G Page 1 of 1 Page 11 Page 17 Item#1. BASIS OF BEARING S.1() 5.11 N8g'15'23'W 2640.72' .15 S,14 5,10 1 4 E1 16 W. FRANKLIN RD. SA 5 13 Q.35 S89'15'2.3'E 1320.37' I 1 I ZONE CC + ++ 1187150 s.f. I.`,, w cw I �I + + + + K3 WJ+ + + + + tN + t t # + VJ V7 i t + * + + I + + + + + + + * + ZONE R-40 + + H + + + + o+ N57'06'00"W + + + +# + ++ * SyE. k• 149.94' + + 13.04 o.c. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + 4- t + + + + t + + + IN60.22 50 W + + 20 + + # + 1 1 y + # 293.40' + + + NE 1 16 N891502 W 132}_18' N 1/16 L CURVE TABLE -� CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CH011D DIST. CHORD 9RG. DELTA 77,29 `" 17 -E I o Cl 500.00 1 131,19 130,91 550'29'4-41- 15'02'00" C, F r .c 1�CALE: 1'=300" 0 75 150 300 604 w.ih o..!qua`. ..ih,.i. M_SL •6.i Irlir Fwk 1 4 !'.A 1r lY � � EXHIBIT __ DRAWING FOR xs THE 10 AT MERIDIAN-' ' SURVEY nriwr4E 16ET y {1q nr.IxF.s-erm a�w RE—ZONE 1 ]RAJ U r. `y LgC- E7}IN TFE NE h OF lHE NE 1¢Of SE€nON 13, T-]H. 0A� R.1 i'., B.U., €IT'!OF NEBII)IAN, AEIA ❑WNTf, IDAHO ]f1�f]421 Page 12 Page 18 Item#1. EXHIBIT_ DESCRIPTION FOR THE 1DAT MERIDIAN GMY OF MERIDIAN ZONE R-40 A portion of land located in the NE114 of the N E 1 M of Section 1S. T.3N„ R,IW, 0,M., City of Meri4ian, Ada County. Idaho more particularly described as follows, Commencing at NE corner of said Section 15 from which the N114 corner of said Section 15 bears North BW15'23"West, 2640.72 feet; thence along the East boundary line of said Section 15 South 00°33'16'West, 1,329,09 feat to the N 1 116 corner of said Section 15; thence along the South boundary line of the NE114 cfthe N E 1 A of said Section 16 North 89`1902"West, 20-27 feet the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said South boundary line North 89'1602"West, 1,300,91 feet to the NE1116 of said Section 15; thence along the Nest boundary Ilne of NE114 of the NE114 of said Seetlon 15 North 00835' 2" East_ 1,018.91 feet; thence leaving said ~!Vest boundary line South 42'68744" East, 723.60 feet; thence 131.19 feet along the arc of curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 500.OD feet, a central angle of 15'02'W' and a long chord which bears South 50°2944"East, 130.81 feet: thence South 56°00'""East, 371.54 feet; thence South 60°22'W'East, 293.40 feet; thence South 57'0608"Fast, 149.94 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEG INNING. Containing 13_04 acres, more or less_ a_ 7729 ° 1111 OF 01 Page 1 of 1 Page 13 Page 19 Item#1. BASIS OF BEARING .10 s,i1 N9915'23"W 2W.72' $.15 5.14 SAO 1 4 Ei 16 W. FRANKUN RD. E.15 k3 D,3 ' S89 t5'23�E 732'a: 7' �7n ZONE CC �o 0 i I+ + ,1' Inc M+ + 1187150 s.f. I°v CD�+ t + � # r 27.25 -o.c. t + I-n1+ + + + r Z rl + + + + `r w + + t t + I. + + + + + {�} ii10�t + t t + +* ZONE R-40 + + + + + + p 457'05'98*W + + +568184 s.f_+ + +# + + + + + 13.04 ❑.c. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + * + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I + + + + + + + t t I + + + + + + + + + l�60'22'54"w + + + + 20'27' + + + + + + 293.40' + + + NE 1 16 — ! N89-15'o 'w 1321.18'� N 1 16 CUFP11€ TABLE � 7729 CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CHORD MST_ CHORD OK- DELTA � Cl 300.00 131.19 1-M81 S50'29'44"E 15'02'00" Y .C, 4 75 1 DO M 00 IDAHO EXHIBIT _ DRAWING FOR SURVEY p�/CJ THE 10 AT MERIDI�4N U R V C T Bow- ykHo 'm 9NEET M0 @716E IOAHa eiTa, RE—ZONE 1 GRGROUP,�1� 1 Icy {'. 12GEI 6�-951'S V r, LLC L�Cw7[h IN.HE 1f I IFIE MC 7i Cr WC{POH JZ. 7.— DWG. 6AlE RIX B.M., CM CF MEAJ6WN, AaX P74wTfi', ID►rla s17gI2021 Page 14 Page 20 Item#1. B. Conceptual Development Plan(dated: N4afeh 10 20" July 26.2021) Franklin Road -- - - I-------- i Project Summary Q—fIH�I lull) I IMl II IIILIII II I _�aays,-a saws II � Hu 11 I _..x31.r.,er_Eereulwm-wus �z4 oog ��QI ftldl T �1 '�11111f I� I �o:�oommereal u¢e isc.azss ..�`i 1JK" dF J I F- F�,NI�g ReWl,[d aaasPaoe¢ .1"�. - !—w'R •�` _.� ... �. I,p F�,Nlri PmNtli[I 595 Wacec ,_ � •� _� Ib Reeltlan tlal ti P hi� f eR E9aa anrsr:y xRo,-Roa ,m nnm: Y '9 _ ce Y R 9R Ts61 llnit, 559 unlla — y f «7. a,ulg Requl,ea 92a¢Face[ _ S�4 '. �� — w,ungP.alloeo �I I•R I . �IIIII Ilmll lllll� 1nll��Im IIH I Imllll .• - — 'ti,:: j - i i=nba4t Q-rives---..__-�—....;. I 10 Mile Road & Franklin Road Residential & Commercial Mixed Use Center ,- Page 15 Page 21 ■.I C. Conceptual Building Elevations Multi-Family(Flats): FRONT RIGHT Ilia - REAR LEFT FRONT RIGHT � 1�e� �� .-�._��Orll�ii�, ��I■�J�■�� 11 ��i■�■� �ell�i I 7" f �■ ■ REAR I -1 lhll0I ICI LEFT 11ri Page 16 � � 4 J •• \aR � � YFrafiEly+ FradF.le'� �:._ �gfl Elev $ Bldg Ej WE 3w Page 17 �a s 11 it 1 � �'� •.. !'�11� j1+��,I� ��I �I 1 0 fll ! sir � �l n� i?� i� 11L 11� — ■ -� - Irk ,��`' _ -1� __��.� ��► i T 1 Multi-Family(Townhome Style): FRONT it � IC RIGH + ; ■i REAR �1 } EA LEFF gn- -� �`i ii ■i � Ira■ r � ■ � li Lti_-14y. ca-- i �. t wry :"r it, f nr it I (High-Density . �ru ! � 1 �C I I IL'�G ! ! I ! ! J�j � �_■ FRONT'[ S RIGHT REAR PEP- LEFT Page 21 I � 1 � --- �� ! ! 1,_ 9 i❑III - � i ! ! 1 � I�P! � �f i � � .� �-_� � �i�� ,ice❑ � � � - i _ 11111111,`Yl l r 1 _t r ~ _ 7��1 I11111111i a.. 4� � I Ilf f 1 t - _ _ M •LEI ICI€- Page 23 Item#1. u IX. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. A Development Agreement(DA)is required as a provision of annexation of this property.Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance,a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s)at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum,incorporate the following provisions: a. The subject property shall develop in substantial compliance with the conceptual development plan and building elevations in Section VIII.B and the land use,transportation,and design elements of the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan(TMISAP). b. The project shall comply with the applicable design elements as noted in the Application of Design Elements matrix in the TMISAP(see pg. 3-49) and the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual. c. Access to the site via W. Franklin Rd., S. Ten Mile Rd. and W. Cobalt Dr. shall be restricted as recommended by ACHD in Section IX.K. d. The subject property shall be subdivided prior to any deve ,,pfflen*eeeuffing an the site issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the development. e. The Kennedy Lateral shall be piped in its entirety where it crosses the subject property as required by UDC 11-3A-6B.3 unless otherwise waived by City Council as set forth in UDC 1I- 3A-6B.3a. City Council approved a waiver to UDC 11-3A-6B.3 to allow certain sections of the Kennedy Lateral to remain open as proposed. f. Prior to submittal of a preliminary plat application,the applicant shall execute a mutual agreement with the property owner of parcel#1215131400 on the terminus of W. Cobalt Dr. in conformance with the approved concept plan. If a mutual agreement cannot be reached,the applicant shall design and construct the half section of W. Cobalt Dr., so that the center line for Page 24 Page 30 Item#1. the portion that abuts parcel#1215131400 is alone the shared property boundary.with the centerline of W. Cobalt Dr. eventually turning southwest(proceeding from east to west)to allow for a stub in a location to be approved by ACHD. PUBLIC WORKS 2. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 Any unused sanitary sewer and/or water services or mains must be abandoned. 1.2 Ensure no permanent structures(trees,bushes,carports,trash enclosures, etc.) are built within any utility easements. B. FIRE DEPARTMENT No comments were received. C. POLICE DEPARTMENT https:llweblink.meridiancily.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=227946&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCitX D. PARK'S DEPARTMENT No comments were received. E. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT(NMID) https:llweblink.meridiancily.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=228197&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianCitX F. ADA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES https:llweblink.meridianciU.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=227634&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianCitX G. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH https:llweblink.meridianciU.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=228247&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianCitX H. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO(COMPASS) https:llweblink.meridiancily.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=228703&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCitX I. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SCHOOL IMPACT TABLE https:llweblink.meridianciU.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=228965&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianCitX J. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https:llweblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=229278&dbid=0&repo=Meridian CitX K. WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT(WASD) https:llweblink.meridiancily.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=228985&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCitX Page 25 Page 31 Item#1. X. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the Applicant's proposal to annex the subject 40.30-acre property with R-40 and C-C zoning districts consistent with the MU-COM, HDR and MU-RES FL UM designations for this property. (See section V above for more information) 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the R-40 and C-C zoning districts and the purpose statements of the residential and commercial districts. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health,safety,and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare in this area. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The City Council finds the proposed map amendment will not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services. 5. The annexation (as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The City Council finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City. Page 26 Page 32