The URL can be used to link to this page

Z - Signed Findings Item 2. F36 CITY OF MERIDIAN E IDIAN .,.. FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW �` AND IDAHO DECISION& ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Conditional Use Permit for a drive-through establishment within 300-feet of an existing drive-through on 1.0 acres of land in the C-G zoning district for Popeyes Drive-Through,Located at 6343 N.Linder Road,by JRW Construction,LLC. Case No(s).H-2021-0030 For the Planning& Zoning Commission Hearing Date of: June 17,2021 (Findings on July 1,2021) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 17, 2021, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 17,2021, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 17,2021, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 17,2021,incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code,and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian,which was adopted April 19,2011,Resolution No. 11-7 84 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this decision,which shall be signed by the Chairman of the Commission and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Planning Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER CASE NO(S). H-2021-0030—Popeyes Drive-Through CUP Page 1 Item 2. F 7 7. That this approval is subject to the conditions of approval in the attached staff report for the hearing date of June 17, 2021,incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the Planning & Zoning Commission's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § I I- 5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Conditional Use Permit is hereby approved in accord with the conditions of approval in the staff report for the hearing date of June 17,2021,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Two(2)Year Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit,when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City in accord with UDC 11-513-6F.1. During this time,the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting,the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two(2)year period in accord with UDC 11-513-617.2. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-513-6.F.1,the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one(1)two (2)year period. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the Commission may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or Commission may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521,any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff report for the hearing date of June 17,2021 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER CASE NO(S). H-2021-0030—Popeyes Drive-Through CUP Page 2 Item 2. 38 By a�tif of the Planning&Zoning Commission at its regular meeting held on the 1 St day of u Y 92021. COMMISSIONER RHONDA MCCARVEL, CHAIRMAN VOTED COMMISSIONER ANDREW SEAL,VICE CHAIRMAN VOTED COMMISSIONER NATE WHEELER VOTED COMMISSIONER STEVEN YEARSLEY VOTED COMMISSIONER WILLIAM CASSINELLI VOTED COMMISSIONER NICK GROVE VOTED COMMISSIONER MARIA LORCHER VOTED Rhonda McCarvel, Chairman 7-1-2021 Attest: Chris Johnson,City Clerk Copy served upon the Applicant,the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and the City Attorney. By: Dated: 7-1-2021 City Clerk's Office CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER CASE NO(S). H-2021-0030—Popeyes Drive-Through CUP Page 3 Item 2. EXHIBIT A ■ E STAFF N -- STAFF REPORT a H o COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 6/3/-2021 6/17/2021 Legend DATE: Project Location TO: Planning&Zoning Commission ', ------ FROM: Joseph Dodson,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 a SUBJECT: H-2021-0030 Popeye's Drive-Through—CUP FEE FFE LOCATION: The site is located at 6343 N. Linder � ff Road,the southwest corner of W. Chinden Boulevard/Hwy. 20/26 and N. Linder Road,in the NE '/4 of the NE '/4 of Section 26,Township 4N.,Range 1W. � I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Conditional Use Permit for a drive-through establishment within 300-feet of an existing drive-through on 1.0 acres of land in the C-G zoning district with concurrent Administrative Design Review for the proposed building elevations. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 1.0-acre Future Land Use Designation Mixed-Use Community Existing Land Use Vacant/undeveloped Proposed Land Use(s) Restaurant with a dual drive-through Current Zoning General Retail and Service Commercial District(C-G) Physical Features (waterways, None hazards, flood plain,hillside) Neighborhood meeting date; # April 5,2021;no attendees(One phone call after of attendees: meeting, see application materials online) History(previous approvals) AZ-06-006;PP-13-031;FP-14-020; MDA-13-019 (DA Inst. #114014784). Page 1 ® � m 1 1 1 CHIN 1i� CH3ND.FN�-- NIIIIINN11111I 11111 � ��.� .-� 11111111■■Illlllr Z '� Z man soon ■Iw111 1I111111■■r!■ ��.. ■111III■■ �I _ . 111111 _� ►�� :� _ ■■■ ■■ �■ .■IIIIIII '� ��t"""- .',Y, ■■■ ■■■■ , 11111 ■■1111■■■ M■■M IIIIIII ■111111111 s .�-� ,.r ■■■ ��•r _=IIIIIMI f bl �11111111■. • � � ■ �� ,• - � 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _ CHINDFN L AL. CMINDFN _ r p1■_�;■�■■�■II►Q�■■■■■I ■IIrIINN11111I 11111 ■IIIIINN11111I mill " 11111111■■Illlllr Z I1111111■■Ill.lr Z 1111111I ■11111 1 LJ III oil ■IIIII 1 LJ 1I111111 ■■ M 1I111111 ■■ M �I on son ■ I111III■■ �" 1111111r 1111111 ■■■ ■■■ •son ME moil �■ — monsoon ■■■■■■■ MI IIII M1 ■ ■IIII■ ■ MMMMMM■ I■�11111 11 ■ ■■■ ■■ ■■■ 1■11 II11111111 :IIII ■■■ ■■■■ MI11111111 . ■1111 MIN ■■■■■■ M Noll in _ . MMM MMM �� I111111 ■I11111 11� — III II �N111111■IIIMt J 11111111 IN &@ — 11111I MINI/ � 1111111111� � � 41111111111� li� � • Item 2. EXHIBIT A F41 C. Representative: Same as Owner IV. NOTICING Planning&Zoning Posting Date Newspaper Notification 5/14/2021 Radius notification mailed to 5/11/2021 properties within 500 feet Site Posting Date 5/21/2021 Next Door posting 5/12/2021 V. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed drive-through is for a 2,325 square foot Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen restaurant that is within 300-feet of a separate drive-through to the south,which requires Conditional Use Permit approval(CUP)per UDC Table 11-213-2 and the specific use standards,UDC 11-4-3-11. The submitted site plan shows a rectangular building situated relatively centered on the site with angled parking along the east and north boundaries. The site plan shows one-way drive aisles around the building that connects to a two-way drive aisle in the northwest corner of the site;this two-way drive aisle is off-site but the adjacent property shares the same ownership. The Applicant anticipates the north drive aisle to be the main point of access to the drive-through. The subject site is located within the Mixed-use Community(MU-C) future land use which contemplates a multitude of uses,residential, commercial, and otherwise. Due to the size of the site, this singular site cannot be expected to contain three distinct uses as discussed within the mixed-use sections of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Instead,those uses within the nearby radius should also be contemplated for compliance with this future land use. Staff finds the proposed use and the surrounding uses,both existing and planned,comply with the MU-C fixture land use designation. Specific Use Standards: The proposed drive-through establishment is subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-11,Drive-Through Establishment. A site plan is required to be submitted that demonstrates safe pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation on the site and between adjacent properties.At a minimum,the plan is required to demonstrate compliance with the following standards: In general,Staff does not support the proposed site design and is recommending revisions for the Commission to consider;Staffs analysis of the specific use standards and any recommendations are in italics. 1) Stacking lanes have sufficient capacity to prevent obstruction of driveways,drive aisles and the public right-of-way by patrons; The proposed site layout places a dual ordering drive-through along the south of the site and the pick-up window on the east side of the building. With this site design the proposed drive-through has a minimal stacking lane due to the overall site and building being relatively small. Furthermore, the site design is made for traffic to flow in a circular pattern around the building utilizing a portion of the drive aisle adjacent to the west side of the building as the stacking lane. Furthermore, the proposed site design with the anticipation of the extended north drive aisle as Page 3 Item 2. EXHIBIT A 42 the main entry point requires patrons who intend to park and utilize the dining room to go through the site along the west boundary, use the shared drive aisle along the south boundary to head east, and finally enter the site again to use the parking spaces. As proposed by the Applicant, Staff can envision patrons double stacking to order faster and block the one-way drive along the west boundary and effectively restricting patrons from using the parking spaces along the east boundary. Staff also envisions patrons blocking and/or utilizing the north drive aisle and obstructing both this anticipated exit and entry for the site with as few as seven (7) cars stacked along the west of the building(approximately 140'from the ordering window to the north drive aisle). Therefore,Staff recommends multiple changes to the site design:1) one drive-through instead of two should be utilized;2) the ordering and pick-up areas be flipped on the site to have the pick-up window on the west side of the building and the menu boards located near the northeast side of the site;and 3)flip the parking from the east side of the site to the west side of the site. These changes will allow for adequate stacking with less potential of obstructing the existing drive aisle along the south boundary of the site and allow customers who want to utilize the dining room better access to parking which would be on the west side of the building instead of the east. Further analysis is below in the Access and Parking sections of this report. In addition,Staff does not agree with the Applicant that the northern drive aisle would be utilized as the main access point to the site and instead Staff believes the existing drive aisle along the south of the site will be utilized more for the drive-through component of the business.Because the site is designed to function as a one-way loop, the Applicant should provide more than adequate signage to ensure patrons utilize the traffic flow correctly. 2)The stacking lane shall be a separate lane from the circulation lanes needed for access and parking, except stacking lanes may provide access to designed employee parking. Per the submitted site plan, the stacking lane(s)are along the west side of the site and are separated from the west drive aisle by striping despite having two drive-through menu boards/speakers. With two proposed drive-through speakers, Staff does not find the proposed separation to be sufficient. In fact, and as noted above, Staff believes patrons would utilize the drive west drive aisle as the second stacking lane and completely obstructing this drive aisle and site exit. Staffs recommended changes above would help alleviate this issue by removing the dual drive-through speaker and placing the singular one along the north/east side of the site adjacent to the one-way drive aisle that is eight feet wider than the west drive aisle. Further analysis is below in the Access section of this report. 3)The stacking lane shall not be located within ten(10) feet of any residential district or existing residence; The stacking lane is not located within 10'of any residential district or residence. 4)Any stacking lane greater than one hundred(100) feet in length shall provide for an escape lane; and The stacking lane exceeds 100'in length but utilizes some of the one-way drive aisle as the stacking area so it is difficult to discern where the stacking lane starts. However, there is also no need for a designated escape lane because the site design does not close off the menu board and patrons can exit the drive-through by utilizing the drive aisle. The adjacent drive aisle is wide enough to function as the escape lane so Staff has no concern with the Applicant complying with this standard with the recommended changes noted above that allow for patrons to exit directly west through the new drive aisle along the north boundary or to the south adjacent to the pick-up window on the west side of the site should they decide they no longer wish to order. Page 4 Item 2. EXHIBIT A 43 5)The site should be designed so that the drive-through is visible from a public street for surveillance purposes. The proposed drive-through is located along the south and east side of the site and is visible from Linder Road. With Staffs recommended changes, the menu boards would be located along the north side of the property with the pick-up window on the west side of the building and less visible than currently proposed. After discussions with Meridian Police, they are more concerned with the site circulation than they are regarding the pick-up window being less visible on the west side of the building. Locating the pick-up window on the west side of the building still allows it to be visible from Chinden Boulevard and from within the commercial subdivision. Staffs specific recommendations can be found in Section VIII.A2 &A3. The proposed use of a Restaurant is subject to an additional specific use standard listed in UDC 11-4- 3-49 and notes that the minimum amount of parking shall be one (1) space for every 250 square feet of gross floor area.Based on the proposed building size of 2,325 square feet noted on the submitted site plan, a minimum of nine (9)parking spaces are required. The proposed site plan shows 19 parking spaces, exceeding UDC minimums.At the time of the future Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) application, the data table on the site plan should be corrected to reflect the correct minimum standards of a restaurant use instead of the general commercial ratio. Access: Access to the site is shown via two drive aisles: one along the south boundary which is currently existing, and; one abutting the site in the northwest corner that is proposed to be constructed with this project. The new proposed drive aisle would traverse an undeveloped lot and connect to a drive aisle that serves existing commercial buildings along Chinden(including an additional drive- through). This drive aisle is the proposed main entry point to the site, according to the Applicant. The south drive aisle is existing and traverses through the entire commercial subdivision with an access to a private drive aisle intended to be an auxiliary ingress/egress point for the properties in this area. Because the south drive aisle does not have any parking that directly accesses this drive aisle and has access to an auxiliary ingress/egress point, Staff believes this drive aisle will be far more utilized than the new north drive aisle that starts much closer to the Chinden ingress/egress and is essentially a parking lot instead of a drive aisle. Therefore,with the potential access points and the concerns introduced above, Staff has recommended revisions to the site plan to help mitigate the concerns and increase the efficiency and safety of the site design. First,Staff recommends the drive-through contain only one(1) ordering speaker to help mitigate double stacking issues. Secondly,Staff recommends mirroring the site to have the menu board on either the east or north sides of the site therefore moving the pick-up window to the west side of the building. Staff does not know if the entire site needs to be flipped placing the main entrance facing south;this would not be preferred as the more architectural elevations would be facing internal rather than towards the adjacent busy roads.However,Staff assumes the internal portions of the building can be flipped to move the pick-up window to the west side of the building and maintain the patio space and building entry facing north along the entrwyway corridor. With these changes, the entire building can be shifted south and remove the need for any vehicle use area along the south side of the building.Additional landscaping or other features could be utilized in this area. Furthermore, the building shift to the south allows for the menu board to be placed near the north side or northeast corner of the building further away from the patio area Staff envisions there would be adequate room along the north of the building site to include additional landscaping to screen and mitigate the additional noise generated by vehicles ordering while patrons utilize the patio space. In short, shifting the site south and flipping the location of the ordering and pick-up windows — Page 5 Item 2. EXHIBIT A 44 opens up the site and allows for easier and more logical ingress and egress to the drive-through by allowing vehicles to enter the site in the southeast corner,stack along the east and northeast sides of the building,pick-up their order along the west side of the building, and then immediately exit via the southbound one-way drive aisle to the shared drive aisle along the south boundary. Staffs recommended site design is based on the assumption that more traffic will utilize the drive aisle along the south boundary than the proposed drive aisle in the northwest corner. Parking: A minimum of one (1)parking space is required to be provided for every 250 square feet of gross floor area for the proposed restaurant use. The proposed building is shown as 2,325 square feet requiring a minimum of 9(rounded down from 9.3)parking spaces; the submitted site plan shows 19 proposed parking spaces exceeding UDC minimums. Consistent with Staff recommendations above, Staff recommends flipping the parking from the east side of the site to the west side of the site and face them south to further mitigate conflicts of stacking and parking. By placing the angled parking on the west side and facing them south instead of north, combined with Staff's previous recommendations offlipping the order and pick-up areas, the building can be shifted east by approximately the width of the proposed 20'drive aisle and the angled parking stalls. Therefore, the east drive aisle and south entrance could be used solely for ordering and stacking at the new location of the menu boards along the north end of the site. With the angled parking along the west side of the building, the one-way drive aisle must be at least 13 feet wide per UDC 11-3C-4 but Staff feels it should largely mirror what is currently proposed on the east side (approximately 20 feet wide) to allow for the drive aisle to function as the escape plan as discussed above. Furthermore, the flip of the site allows the escape lane and the drive-thru exit to pick-up their order and immediately exit to the south without impeding as many parking spaces. The Applicant could then designate the parking along the north drive aisle as employee parking to meet the drive- through establishment specific use standard that states employee parking may be impeded by stacking lanes (the new order and stacking location along the east and north sides of the building could impede the parking along the north boundary). As noted, to make all of this work all of Staff's recommendations should be utilized including the requirement of clear and visible signage noting the required traffic flow for the site. The existing Development Agreement requires cross-access through all of the commercial parcels within the Knighthill Center Subdivision. Staff does not have a copy of said cross-access agreement but with other applications,the Applicant has shown compliance with this requirement. Staff does not have concerns with the Applicant complying with the existing requirement. A minimum one(1)bicycle parking space is required to be provided for every 25 vehicle spaces or portion thereof per UDC 11-3C-6G;bicycle parking facilities are required to comply with the location and design standards listed in UDC 11-3C-5C.Bicycle parking is shown on the submitted plans in compliance with code. Pedestrian Walkways: A striped pedestrian walkway is depicted on the site plan from the proposed building to the multi-use pathway along W. Chinden Blvd. as required by UDC 11-3A-19B.4a. It also appears there is a sidewalk proposed near the south boundary of the site as a connection to the sidewalk along Linder Rd.However, it is not clear by the submitted plans where the sidewalk is and appears to run into the proposed trash enclosure location. Staffs recommended changes would allow the trash enclosure to be pushed further north enough to allow for an unobstructed sidewalk along the south boundary of the site. Because it is unclear if the Applicant is proposing a sidewalk along the south boundary, Staff recommends the Applicant make it clearly visible where the pedestrian facilities are when revising the site plan; this allows the Applicant to match what is existing along the south side of the drive aisle along the south boundary of the site.In addition, this pedestrian walkway to Linder has to traverse a drive aisle and should be distinguished from the driving surface. The Applicant should also make it clear where a pedestrian connection to the Linder sidewalk is Page 6 Item 2. EXHIBIT A ■ proposed. Furthermore, subsection B of this code section requires that the pedestrian walkway be distinguished from the driving surface by being constructed with pavers, brick, or scored/colored concrete. The proposed site plan appears to only show striping which does not comply with this code section. The Applicant should show compliance with this code section with a future CZC submittal. Landscaping: Parking lot landscaping is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C. Landscaping is depicted on the landscape plan in Section VII.B. A minimum 5-foot wide landscape buffer is required to be provided along the perimeter of the parking or other vehicular use areas as set forth in UDC 11-313-8C.1. The proposed parking spaces align the perimeter of the site which allows the Applicant to utilize the existing street buffer landscaping as the required landscaping. Staff agrees with this design to maximize the site design. This code requirement is also applicable along the west boundary of the site where a 12 foot wide one-way drive is proposed heading south. The submitted plans do not show any perimeter landscaping along this boundary. Because the adjacent property is owned by the same property owner and the western drive aisle is intended to always function as a one-way drive aisle, Staff is amenable to placing the required 5-feet of landscaping on that property instead. With the CZC submittal, the landscape plan should be revised to show the required 5-foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to the drive west drive aisle. Street buffer landscaping, including sidewalks/multi-use pathway, along N. Linder Rd. and W. Chinden Blvd.were installed with development of the overall subdivision. The submitted landscape plans show the buffers remaining as it currently exists except for the new pedestrian connection to the multi-use pathway along Chinden.Proposed buffer landscaping complies with UDC requirements. Mechanical Equipment: All mechanical equipment adjacent to the building and outdoor service and equipment should be incorporated into the overall design of buildings and landscaping so that the visual and acoustic impacts of these functions are fully contained and out of view from adjacent properties and public streets as set forth in UDC 11-3A-12. If mechanical equipment is proposed to be roof-mount, all equipment should be screened and out of view as noted above. Building Elevations: The Applicant applied for Design Review concurrently with this CUP application and therefore provided building elevations to be reviewed. The building elevations were submitted as shown in Section VII.0 and incorporate two main field materials,fiber cement siding and stone. The siding and stone are two contrasting colors(coal-like color and white,respectively) which adds to the overall modern design of the building. On the east and west elevations,the number of proposed windows can act as either an accent material or a third field material. The lack of modulation along the north and south elevations are of concern to Staff. hi order to meet the modulation requirements for these two facades,a column of stone at least 6 inches in depth should be added to each facade,matching the overall aesthetic by placing them as evenly as possible on each facade. The detached drive-through canopy is shown with the same two field materials(fiber cement siding and stone)as the main building and meets all of the applicable design standards outlined in the Architectural Standards Manual. No elevations were submitted that show the proposed trash enclosure; this should be corrected with the future CZC submittal and should match the style of the proposed building. The submitted landscape plans do show adequate screening of the trash enclosure. Certificate of Zoning Compliance: A Certificate of Zoning Compliance application is required to be submitted for the proposed use prior to submittal of a building permit application to ensure consistency with the conditions in Section VIII and UDC standards. Page 7 Item 2. EXHIBIT A ■ VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed conditional use permit with the conditions included in Section VIII per the Findings in Section IX. The Director has approved the administrative design review request with conditions. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard this item on June 17,2021.At the public hearing.the Commission moved to approve the subject Conditional Use Permit request. 1. Summary of the Commission public hearing a. In favor: Erik Wylie.Applicant b. In opposition:None c. Commenting: Erik Wylie. d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Joseph Dodson,Associate Planner. f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission. a. None 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Agreement with Staff s memorandum and recommended changes based on revised site plan(see revised conditions in Section VIII belowl. Page 8 Item 2. EXHIBIT A ■ VII. EXHIBITS A. Pr-opo d Revised Site Plan(dated: 4,115/20216/07/2021)NOT APPR NIE—P T 1 T L: FERE55L)WED IRRIGATION I LINE PYLON SIGN -T----r---7-7 V MENU MIi ORDER CANO IT -LAND5CAFE I 4y ONE VVA'I-- DO NOT F I'M Fj 5 G ............... CLEARANCE DAR ................ TO BUILT IN CONJUNCTION - PRIMARY ACCESS AISLE 13F 13 1 WITH I SITE LJNDEFGpNN SO.DRAIN ALL WATER, f A N111 114 SITE FAT111 BIKE PARKING R LOADING EXISTING BUILDING d I_- ...I'- �i I- -LANDSCAPE I VACANT LOT 4 4'LANDSCAPE BUFFER LANDSCAPE PLANTER- XX DRIVE-THPUIENTER SIGN EXISTING DRIVE WATER MAIN T7 r�:Z,:DT�7 ��jC�2;12 THANK YOU/1)C,NOT ENTER SIGN-----__ ONE WAY SIGN DL)MF5TEK ENCLOSURE 5EWI-K MAIN PARKING CALCULATIONS: REQUIRED: I FEK 50051'GROSS SPACES PROPOSED SITE PLAN FZOVI�,Ci 5011 325=4.G5(5 SPACES RfQU[i 16 2 PACES 0.79ACRE HANDICAP - 6 PARKING SPACES 25 41 5FACff5 I I 5FACff LIC SPACE 1 10 CAR STACKING IJfCYGLff CALCULATIONS: 8U�FED- I PI2R 21 PURPOSED VEHICLE SPACES SCALE:1"=20'-0" V 31714 5TAC 5 Page 9 Item 2. EXHIBIT A 48 B. Proposed Landscape Plan(dated: 4/15/2021)NOT APPROVED V Y�•�J W4•.f.,ek.y-r,ec.io 4e xv arm. M"SISN I if I New PIa+s w � • ,Ism s� � ■r.�,aa fi�tee.sr4 • } it I * t�rti# gyyy li.,�r f '• I 4&a n w•p.Fad„:�ucl 6�.1�.r7e„/erver 3RW C.,�d'.nr CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN POPE-YES Page 10 Item 2. EXHIBIT A 49 C. Proposed Building Elevations and Color Rendering �.y I:L �.as.. y. q arc8rfecfs ,,.•POPEYES EIEI HIS SPECIFICATIONS:q- TURFRs nwo —tJ v s �ti �FG G H2OnnAS� NS-2 FOR SHUiiER M/WUFAGTUERS ULL .r__R.2 _maw -_.u� r �. _ — sn._i REFER T9 h1A5TERFNGHSGHEGUrE URFNEHES ..„M µ - _ F REFER TU MiuTERLGHTF—IE mwr ,, 1. �•- GHT .a s nRFeFF F�,oNR �eee�ey, Parker .. __ _ ....... ._.,._ POPEYES Page 11 T4;; dgs _ Item 2. EXHIBIT A 51 VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING 1. Future development of this site shall comply with the existing Development Agreement(DA Inst. #114014784), and associated conditions of approval(AZ-06-006; PP-13-031;FP-14-020; MDA-13-019). 2. The Conditional Use Permit for the proposed Drive-Through Establishment is hereby approved with the following conditions of approval: b. The site shall be redesigned per the specific revisions noted below in VIII.A3 and A4 below. c. The west drive-aisle shall be no less than 20 15 feet in width(not including the drive- through lane)and the east drive aisle shall be no less than 12 feet in width. d. The parking spaces along the north boundary shall be row shown as employee parking only on the revised site plan. e. Additional signage is required throughout the site to efficiently and adequately direct patrons to the menu boards and throughout the site with minimal conflict. f. The proposed off-site east-west drive aisle along Chinden Blvd. shown on the adjacent property(Parcel#R4995350100) shall be constructed prior to receiving Certificate of Occupancy, as proposed; g. Prior to receiving Certificate of Occupancy on the proposed building, a Property Boundary Adjustment shall be obtained by the Applicant to reflect the new location of the west property line,as shown on the submitted plans. 3. The site plan submitted with the future Certificate of Zoning Compliance application shall be revised as follows: a. Depiet the piek up wifidew on the west side of the building a-ad the mefm bear-d/ofdef oaken-a fg the r,,,thLnet4heast side of the .,,4da n ; b. Depiet the nefth f4eing angled pafkiag te be en the west side of the site instead of the side of the site a-ad angle them setAMetmd; the site along the nefth drive aisle with the eptien to ineefpefate mer-e landseaping fe d. Designate the pafkifig aleng the fiefth betmdai=y ef the site as employee efily par-king a* setAh side ef this shafed drive aisle; depiet these pedestfian walkways a-ad thei ewmeetions,.1eaf y revisedon �site p s. f. Per UDC 11-3A-19B.4b, depict pedestrian walkways across driving surfaces to be constructed with bricks,pavers,and/or colored or scored concrete to clearly delineate the driving surface from the pedestrian walkway. Page 13 Item 2. EXHIBIT A 52 4. The landscape plan submitted with the future Certificate of Zoning Compliance application shall be revised as follows: a. Show compliance with UDC 11-3B-8C by constructing the required 5 feet of perimeter landscaping along the west boundary adjacent to the revised angled parking location; this shall be constructed with this application regardless of the property line location because there is common ownership between the two properties. 5. The elevations submitted with the Administrative Design Review(DES)application are approved with the following revisions: a. Ensure the east and west elevations have qualifying modulation per standard 3.1A& 3.1B in the Architectural Standards Manual.It is unclear based on the site plan whether the portions of the wall with the brick fagade have the qualifying modulation. Any revisions to the elevations are required with the submittal of the certificate of zoning compliance application. 6. Submit elevations of the trash enclosure that generally matches the proposed building design. 7. Comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-11 —Drive-Through Establishment is required. 8. Comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-49—Restaurant. 9. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance application shall be submitted and approved for the proposed use prior to submittal of a building permit application. 10. The conditional use permit is valid for a maximum period of two (2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time,the Applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground as set forth in UDC 11-5B-6. A time extension may be requested as set forth in UDC 11-5B-6F. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. There are no utilities shown with the plans submitted.Any changes to public water or sewer infrastructure must be reviewed by Public Works prior to approval. C. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT(NMID) https:llweblink.meridiancily.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=229161&dbid=0&roo=MeridianC hty D. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH(CDH) https:llweblink.meridiancily.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=228244&dbid=0&roo=MeridianC iv IX. FINDINGS Conditional Use(UDC 11-5B-6) Findings: The commission shall base its determination on the conditional use permit request upon the following: 1. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located. Page 14 Item 2. EXHIBIT A 53 Commission finds the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed development and meet all dimensional and development regulations of the C-G zoning district if Staffs recommendations of approval are met. 2. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian comprehensive plan and in accord with the requirements of this title. Commission finds the proposed restaurant and drive-through will be harmonious with the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with applicable UDC standards with the conditions noted in Section VIII of this report. 3. That the design, construction,operation and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area. With the conditions of approval in Section VIII, Commission finds the design, construction, operation and maintenance of the proposed use will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood, with the existing and intended character of the vicinity and will not adversely change the essential character of the area. 4. That the proposed use,if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed,will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. Commission finds the proposed use will not adversely affect other properties in the vicinity if it complies with the conditions in Section VIII of this report. 5. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets,schools,parks,police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal,water, and sewer. Commission finds the proposed use will be served by essential public facilities and services as required. 6. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Commission finds the proposed use will not create additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. 7. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes,materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons,property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic,noise,smoke,fumes,glare or odors. Commission finds the proposed use will not be detrimental to any persons,property or the general welfare by the reasons noted above. 8. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction,loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005,eff. 9- 15-2005) Commission finds the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of any such features. Page 15