Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Prescott Ridge H-2020-0047 Findings
Item#7. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI N, AND DECISION& ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Annexation and Zoning of 128.21 Acres of Land with R-8(99.53 Acres),R-15(8.82 Acres) and C-G(19.85 Acres)Zoning; and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 371 Buildable Lots [102 Single-Family Attached,215 Single-Family Detached,38 Townhome, 14 Multi- Family,One(1) Commercial and One(1) School],42 Common Lots and Six(6) Other(Shared Driveway)Lots on 124.81 Acres of Land in the R-8,R-15 and C-G Zoning Districts for Prescott Ridge Subdivision,by Providence Properties,LLC. Case No(s).H-2020-0047 For the City Council Hearing Dates of. February 23,April 13, and May 18,2021 (Findings on June 1,2021) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 18,2021, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 18, 2021, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 18,2021, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 18,2021,incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67, Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § I I-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR PRESCOTT RIDGE—AZ,PP,PS H-2020-0047 - I - Page 139 Item#7. Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 18, 2021, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Annexation&Zoning and Preliminary Plat is hereby approved with the requirement of a Development Agreement per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of May 18,2021, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC I 1-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with I I-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I- 6B-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-651 IA. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR PRESCOTT RIDGE—AZ,PP,PS H-2020-0047 -2- Page 140 Item#7. property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52,Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of May 18,2021 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR PRESCOTT RIDGE—AZ,PP,PS H-2020-0047 -3- Page 141 Item#7. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 1st day of June 2021. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison 6-1-2021 Attest: Chris Johnson 6-1-2021 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 6-1-2021 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR PRESCOTT RIDGE—AZ,PP,PS H-2020-0047 -4- Page 142 Item#7. EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY N --- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I D A H O HEARING May 18,2021 Legend DATE: (Continued from:February 23 and Prot Lcofl-non Y April 13, 2021) -- - ----- TO: Mayor&City Council - FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: H-2020-0047 ' Prescott Ridge—AZ,PP,PST - LOCATION: South of W. Chinden Blvd. and east of N. ® _ McDermott Rd., in the North %2 of Section 28,Township 4N.,Range 1 W. - (Parcels: SO428233640, R6991222210, - f SO428120950, SO428131315, 4 SO428131200, SO428211102) NOTE: At the December I"hearing, the Council moved to remand the project back to the Commission for the out parcel at the northeast corner of the site adjacent to the commercial development to be included in the annexation area and development plan for the site. Since that time, the Applicant has acquired the out parcel and submitted updated plans that include the parcel in the development area. The staff report has been updated accordingly. The Commission heard this project on January 21s`and recommended approval of the updated plans and annexation boundary. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Annexation of a total of 426.53 128.21 acres of land with R-8 (99.53 acres),R-15 (8.82 acres)and C-G (48.47 19.85 acres)zoning districts; and, Preliminary Plat consisting of 395 377 371 buildable lots [346 32-3 single-family residential(94 102 attached-&-222 215/detached),63 38 townhome, 14 multi-family residential, 1 commercial and 1 school],22-39 42 common lots and 6 other(shared driveway) lots on 423.26 42345-3 124.81acres of land in the proposed R-8,R-15 and C-G zoning districts. Private streets are proposed within the townhome portion of the development for internal access and circulation. Altemative Gemplianee to UDG 11 3 F 4 A.4, when*,,...nh,mes are pFepesed, is also requested.Alternative Compliance is no longer required based on the revised plan which includes a mew. Page 1 Page 143 Item#7. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 122.8 124.07 Existing/Proposed Zoning Rural Urban Transition(RUT)in Ada County(existing)/R-8,R-15 and C-G(proposed) Future Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential(MDR)(3-8 units/acre)(113.5+/-acres) with Mixed Use—Regional(MU-R)(-9 10.27+/-acres)along W. Chinden Blvd. Existing Land Use(s) Rural residential/agricultural with 1 existing single-family home Proposed Land Use(s) Residential(single-family attached/detached,townhomes&multi- family)&commercial(medical campus with a hospital and medical offices and retail/restaurant uses) _ Lots(#and type;bldg./common) 395 377 371 buildable lots(316 323 317single-family residential,63 38 townhome, 14 multi-family, 1 commercial and 1 school)/32 39 42common lots/6 other(common driveway)lots Phasing Plan(#of phases) 9 phases wF Number of Residential Units(type 316 323 317 single-family(94 102 attached/ 215 detached),(63 38) of units) townhome and(56)multi-family units Density(gross&net) Overall-3-63 2.96 units/acre(gross);7.M 7.68 units/acre(net) R-8 area:4-87-3.07 units/acre(gross);749 7.07 units/acre(net) R-15 area: 12.97 7.57 units/acre(gross);21.39 13.8 units/acre(net) Open Space(acres,total 44.566 4r 12.43 acres(or 44.,8 15.41%) [%]/buffer/qualified) (49-54 8.04 acres required based on 105.08 80.42 acres of residential area) Amenities Swimming pool,clubhouse,large and small children's play structures, a dog park,multi-use pathways and additional qualified open space beyond the minimum standards Physical Features(waterways, Two(2)segments of the West Tap Sublateral cross this site hazards,flood plain,hillside) Neighborhood meeting date;#of 12/18/19- 11 attendees;and 4/l/20- 13 attendees; 12/16/20 7 attendees: attendees History(previous approvals) A portion of the site is Lot 18,Block 1,Peregrine Heights Subdivision (formerly deed restricted agricultural lot for open space—non-farm that has since expired). B. Community Metrics Description Details Pag e Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) N �Yes • Requires ACHD No Commission Action es/no Access A collector street access(W.Rustic Oak Way)is proposed via W. Chinden (Arterial/Collectors/State Blvd./SH 2O-26 at the half mile which runs through the site and connects to Hwy/Local)(Existing and a future collector street(N.Rustic Way)in the Oaks North development Proposed) from McMillan Rd.An access is proposed via N.McDermott Rd.,a collector street. Traffic Level of Service McDermott Rd.—Better than"D"(acceptable level of service) W.Rustic Oak Way/Levi Ln.—Better than"D"(acceptable level of service) Page 2 Page 144 Item#7. Description Details Pag e Stub Two local stub streets are planned to be constructed with the Oaks North Street/Interconnectivity/Gros development at the southern boundary of the site and extended with this s Access development. Two stub streets(N. Serenity Ave.&W.Fireline Ct.)are proposed to the north for future extension. A cross-access easement is required to be provided to the MU-R designated property to the west. Existing Road Network No public streets exist within the site;N. Levi Ln.,a private lane,exists on the northern portion of the site via W.Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26. Existing Arterial Sidewalks/ There are no existing buffers or sidewalks along N.McDermott Rd. or W. Buffers Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 Proposed Road Improvements Capital Improvements Plan(CIP)I Integrated Five Year Work Plan(IFYWP): • Black Cat Road is listed in the CIP to be widened to 3-lanes from Chinden Boulevard to McMillan Road between 2026 and 2030. • The intersection of Black Cat Road and Chinden Boulevard is listed in the CIP to be widened to 5-lanes on the north leg,5-lanes on the south leg,6-lanes on the east leg and 6-lanes on the south leg between 2026 and 2030. • The intersection of McMillan Road and Black Cat Road is listed in the CIP to reconstructed as a multi-lane roundabout with 2 lanes on the northbound and souhbound legs and 1 lane on the westbound and eastbound legs. • The intersection of McMillan Road and McDermott Road is listed in the CIP to be widened to 3-lanes on the north leg,4-laes on the south leg,3-lanes on the east leg and 3-lanes on the west leg between 2031 and 2035. Fire Service • Distance to Fire Station 3 miles from Station#5 to Serenity Ln.on Chinden&4.4 miles to the McDermott side of the project(Station#7 once constructed,will serve this development) • Fire Response Time Some of this development falls within the 5 minute response time area as shown on the priority growth map;the McDermott side is 8 minutes away and does not meet response time goals • Resource Reliability 80%from Station#5—meets response time goal • Risk Identification 2—current resources would not be adequate to supply service(open waterway) • Accessibility Project meets all required access,road widths and turnarounds as long as phasing plan is followed. • Special/resource needs Project will require an aerial device for the multi-family development— cannot meet this need in the required timeframe.Eagle Station#1 is the closest truck company at approximately 8.4 miles away. • Water Supply Requires 1,000 gallons per minute for one hour for the single-family homes; the multi-family areas will require additional water(may be less if buildings are fully sprinklered) • Other Resources NA Police Service No comments submitted • Distance to Police 9 miles Station • Police Response Time No emergency response data can be provided because this development is near the edge of City limits • Calls for Service 156(within a mile of site between 4/l/19-3/31/20) • Accessibility I No concerns • Specialty/resource needs I None • Crimes 5 (within a mile of site between 4/l/19-3/31/20) • Crashes 4(within a mile of site between 4/l/19-3/31/20) • Other Although located near the edge of City limits,service can be provided if this development is approved. Page 3 Page 145 Item#7. West Ada School District Enrollment Capacity Miles • Distance(elem, 0ev.wschool mS hS) Pleasant View Elementary Opening 20121 650 2.4 f School Y ear Star Middle School 704 1000 6.9 Meridian High School 1965 2400 6.1 Due to the abundant amount of growth in the area,West Ada is actively building new schools,and boundaries are always changing,These future students could potentially attend Owyhee High School. • Capacity of Schools • #of Students Enrolled Wastewater • Distance to Sewer This proposed development is not currently serviceable by Meridian Services Sanitary Sewer service. The sewer trunk line designed to service this development is within The Oaks North Subdivision to the south. • Sewer Shed North McDermott Trunk Shed • Estimated Project Sewer See application ERU's • WRRF Declining 13.92 Balance • Project Consistent with Yes WW Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts/Concerns •Additional 4,662 gpd has been committed •Sewer mains are not allowed in common driveways.Please remove. •The planned sewer trunk line will enter this property at N. Rustic Oak Way •Sewer line in N.Rustic Oak Way shall be 10-inch all the way to Chinden Blvd •This development is subject to paying sanitary sewer reimbursement fees (see Public Works Site Specific Conditions of Approval for detail). Reimbursement fees for the entire subdivision shall be paid prior to city signatures on the first final plat. Water • Distance to Water This proposed development is not currently serviceable by the Meridian Services City water system. Water mainlines designed to service this development are within The Oaks North Subdivision to the south. • Pressure Zone 1 • Estimated Project Water See application ERU's • Water Quality None • Project Consistent with Yes Water Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns None Page 4 Page 146 Item#7. C. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend tsi8enfial Legend f 0 Project Laca-fion I ProjEOf Lacaion t MU- ® Y a 4 3i k MU-R7 JEW � •., f. ,Y )en s fird Ai- EEE� . Zoning Map Planned Development Map f (Legend 0 (fLegend 01 Pra}ect Laca-fion 1 I Protect Lacation _-- t City Limit I I I I � f - + ® — Planned F o v__ r RUT r � S � R-8 T III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Providence Properties,LLC—701 South Allen Street, Ste. 104,Meridian, ID 83642 B. Owners: Joseph Hon— 16790 Rose Park Dr.,Nampa, ID 83687 Raymond Roark—5952 N. Serenity Ln.,Meridian,ID 83646 Page 5 Page 147 Item#7. Lonnie Kuenzli—6210 N. Levi Ln.,Meridian,ID 83646 West Ada School District— 1303 E. Central Dr.,Meridian, ID 83642 C. Representative: Stephanie Leonard,KM Engineering—9233 W. State St.,Boise, ID 83714 IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Notification published in 6/26/2020, 8/28/2020, 11/13/2020,2/5/2021 newspaper l/l/21 Notification mailed to property 6/23/2020, 8/26/2020, owners within 300 feet 12/29/20 11/10/2020,2/2/2021 Applicant posted public hearing notice on site 7/2/2020, 8/27/2020, 1/5/21 11/10/2020,2/4/2021 Nextdoor posting 6/23/2020, 8/27/2020, 11/10/2020,2/2/2021 12/29/20 V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS(Comprehensive Plan) The Future Land Use Map(FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan designates 9 10.27+/-acres along W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 as Mixed Use—Regional(MU-R); and the 113.5+/-acres to the south as Medium Density Residential(MDR). The purpose of the MU-R designation is to provide a mix of employment,retail,and residential dwellings and public uses near major arterial intersections. The intent is to integrate a variety of uses together,including residential, and to avoid predominantly single use developments such as a regional retail center with only restaurants and other commercial uses. Developments should be anchored by uses that have a regional draw with the appropriate supporting uses. The developments are encouraged to be designed consistent with the conceptual MU-R plan depicted in Figure 3D(pg. 3-17). The purpose of the MDR designation is to allow small lots for residential purposes within City limits. Uses may include single-family homes at gross densities of 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The MU-R designated area is located adjacent to a major intersection,W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 and N. McDermott Rd. (future SH-16). The MU-R area is proposed to develop with a medical campus, including a regional hospital, and multi-family apartments.A larger MU-R area than currently designated on the FLUM is proposed which incorporates an additional 9.5+/- acres to the south and east of the current designated area.Because FLUM designations are not parcel specific and the proposed development provides needed services,employment opportunities and housing consistent with that desired in MU-R designated areas, Staff is supportive of the expanded MU-R area provided that a retail component is also included and integrated as part of the development. The MDR designated area is proposed to develop with a mix of single-family attached, detached and townhome units at a gross density of 3-46 2.96 units/acre,which although at the low end of the desired density range, is consistent with that of the MDR designation. Page 6 Page 148 Item#7. The following Comprehensive Plan Policies are applicable to this development: • "Encourage a variety of housing types that meet the needs,preferences,and financial capabilities of Meridian's present and future residents."(2.01.02D) The proposed single-family attached, detached, townhomes and multi family apartments will provide a variety of housing types for future residents in the northwest portion of the City in close proximity to the proposed employment uses on this site and across Chinden Blvd to the north. • "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and urban services at the time of final approval,and in accord with any adopted levels of service for public facilities and services."(3.03.03F) City water and sewer services are not currently available to the subject development, however the main/trunk lines intended to provide service are currently being developed in The Oaks North Subdivision to the south. This development is dependent on the development timing of the phase(s) within The Oaks North for services to be readily available for extension. This developer is attempting to work with The Oaks developer to hasten the timing of utility expansion. • "Avoid the concentration of any one housing type or lot size in any geographical area;provide for diverse housing types throughout the City."(2.01.01 G) Four(4)different housing types are proposed in this development(i.e. single-family attached/detached, townhomes and multi family apartments) along with a wide range of lot sizes for diversity in housing types in this area. • "Encourage compatible uses and site design to minimize conflicts and maximize use of land." (3.07.00) The proposed single-family residential development should be compatible with existing single- family homes to the west in Peregrine Heights and in the development process to the south in The Oaks North and the future school to the east. Larger lot sizes are proposed as a transition to the I-acre lots in Peregrine Heights. Higher density residential uses are planned adjacent to the proposed medical campus at the north boundary and the future school site at the east boundary.A 30 foot wide landscaped buffer with a pedestrian pathway and 8'tall CMU wall is also proposed adjacent to residential uses along the southern and western boundaries of the proposed medical campus to reduce conflicts. • "With new subdivision plats,require the design and construction of pathway connections,easy pedestrian and bicycle access to parks, safe routes to schools,and the incorporation of usable open space with quality amenities."(2.02.01A) A 10'wide multi-use pathway is required within the street buffers along W. Chinden Blvd./SH 20-26 and the north/south collector street(Levi Ln./Rustic Oak), and to the east to the future school site for safe pedestrian access to the school. A large central common area is proposed along the collector street with quality amenities. • "Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Page 7 Page 149 Item#7. Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development." (3.03.03A) The proposed development will connect to City water and sewer systems when available; services are proposed to be provided to and though this development in accord with current City plans. • "Locate higher density housing near corridors with existing or planned transit,Downtown, and in proximity to employment centers."(2.01.01H) The proposed townhomes and multi family apartments in close proximity to the regional hospital and medical campus will provide higher density housing options in close proximity to the employment center and major transportation corridor(i.e. Chinden Blvd/SH2O-26&future SH 16). • "Encourage the development of high quality, dense residential and mixed use areas near in and around Downtown,near employment, large shopping centers,public open spaces and parks, and along major transportation corridors, as shown on the Future Land Use Map."(2.02.01E) Townhomes and a multi family development are proposed in close proximity to the mixed use area along Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26, a major transportation corridor, where employment uses are proposed. • "Maximize public services by prioritizing infill development of vacant and underdeveloped parcels within the City over parcels on the fringe."(2.02.02) The proposed project is located on the fringe of the northwest corner of the City. However, because the land to the north and south has been annexed into the City as well as land located a half mile to the east, services will be extended in this area. Therefore,public services will be maximized by the development of this property. • "Require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks,water and sewer utilities."(3.03.03G) Urban sewer and water infrastructure, when available, and curb, gutter and sidewalks is proposed to be provided as required. • "Annex lands into the corporate boundaries of the City only when the annexation proposal conforms to the City's vision and the necessary extension of public services and infrastructure is provided." (3.03.03) The proposed development plan is consistent with the City's vision in that a mix of uses are proposed including a regional hospital and medical offices in the MU-R designated area adjacent to a major transportation corridor. Residential uses are proposed at densities consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for this area. Public services can be provided and public infrastructure will be extended when available to this site. • "Require collectors consistent with the ACHD Master Street Map(MSM), generally at/near the mid-mile location within the Area of City Impact."(6.01.0313) The MSM depicts a collector street at the half mile between Black Cat and McDermott Roads in the current location of N. Levi Ln. at the northeast corner of the site from W. Chinden Blvd./SH 20-26 to the south to McMillan Rd. A collector street is proposed in accord with the MSM which will connect to N. Rustic Oak Way to the south in The Oaks North subdivision. Page 8 Page 150 Item#7. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in all Mixed Use areas,per the Comprehensive Plan(pg.3-13): (Staffs analysis in italics) • "A mixed-use project should include at least three types of land uses. Exceptions may be granted for smaller sites on a case-by-case basis. This land use is not intended for high density residential development alone." The proposed development includes#mat least three (JJ different land use types—residential off d,office and commercial(retail/restaurant) uses. , to serve the employment area and nearby residents.A public school(i.e. civic use) is planned on the eastern portion of the annexation area; however, it's outside the mixed use designated area and not a part of the proposed development. • "Where appropriate,higher density and/or multi-family residential development is encouraged for projects with the potential to serve as employment destination centers and when the project is adjacent to US 20/26, SH-55, SH-16 or SH-69." Multi family apartments and townhomes are proposed adjacent to the Mixed Use designated area to provide a higher density in close proximity to the employment center located adjacent to W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26. • "Mixed Use areas are typically developed under a master or conceptual plan; during an annexation or rezone request, a development agreement will typically be required for developments with a Mixed Use designation." A Master Plan is proposed with the annexation request which will be incorporated into a Development Agreement to ensure future development is consistent with the Mixed Use designation. • "In developments where multiple commercial and/or office buildings are proposed,the buildings should be arranged to create some form of common,usable area, such as a plaza or green space." The Master Plan depicts shaded itt . area three(3) outdoor courtyard areas ;. Q around the medical office building a large outdoor plaza/ rg een space area in front of the hospital with a shaded seatingarea,rea, and a pedestrian pathway within a 30'wide landscaped common area along the southern and western boundaries of the commercial portion of the development abutting residential uses with two (2) shaded areas of respite. hearing to rej7eet e9mmon usable area smeh as a plaza or green spaee more eentm!to the development with bugd&p anwnged oround the eommon area in aeeord with this prov&ion. • "The site plan should depict a transitional use and/or landscaped buffering between commercial and existing low-or medium-density residential development." There are existing low density homes on 1-acre lots along the west boundary of this site in Peregrine Heights Subdivision adjacent to the area proposed to be zoned C-G and developed with a medical campus.A 30'wide densely landscaped buffer is proposed along the west and south boundaries of the C-G zoned property adjacent to existing and proposed abutting residential uses along with an 8'tall CMU wall as a buffer to future commercial uses. Parking is proposed along these boundaries norM tofiwnf on the main en"drive aisle 6ff W. Rustie Oak "as a better tmnsXon to th residenees to Me south • "Community-serving facilities such as hospitals,clinics, churches, schools,parks, daycares,civic buildings, or public safety facilities are expected in larger mixed-use developments." Page 9 Page 151 Item#7. A future school site is planned on the eastern portion of the annexation area but it is outside the Mixed Use designated area and not a part of this development.A hospital is proposed in the medical campus on the northern portion of the site adjacent to W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 which will provide much needed services in the northern portion of the City. • "Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks,plazas, outdoor gathering areas, open space, libraries,and schools are expected; outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count." A school is planned to develop on the eastern portion of the annexation area but is outside the Mixed-Use designated area and not being developed with this project. Te ..n ui-.sueh spaees- andplaees ���a a Three (3) outdoor courtyard areas are is-proposed jt6±rtt around the medical office building and a large outdoor plaza/green space area with a shaded seating area is proposed in front of the hospital. Two shaded outdoor areas of respite are also proposed within the buffer along the southern boundary of the commercial portion of the development. • "Mixed use areas should be centered around spaces that are well-designed public and quasi- public centers of activity. Spaces should be activated and incorporate permanent design elements and amenities that foster a wide variety of interests ranging from leisure to play. These areas should be thoughtfully integrated into the development and further placemaking opportunities considered." Xe sueh&paees or design elenten"menities are proposed, To ensureAtuie development in the MUR designated area is eonsiqten t with this guid-eline, Staff reeoniniends the eoneept plan " shaded ** - Three (3) outdoor courtyards are proposed ' around the medical office building and a large outdoor plaza/green space area with a shaded seating area is proposed in front of the hospital. Two shaded outdoor areas of respite are also proposed within the buffer along the southern boundary of the commercial portion of the development. • "All mixed-use projects should be directly accessible to neighborhoods within the section by both vehicles and pedestrians." The proposed mixed use development is directly accessible to neighborhoods within the section by a collector street(W. Rustic Oak Way) that runs along the project's east boundary at the half mile between McDermott and Black Cat Roads; a multi-use pathway is planned along the collector street for pedestrian connectivity in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. • "Alleys and roadways should be used to transition from dissimilar land uses, and between residential densities and housing types." There are no roadways separating the commercial/mixed use area from the single-family detached homes and townhomes proposed at the south boundary of the area proposed to be zoned C-G. However, there is a 30-foot wide densely landscaped buffer proposed between the commercial and residential uses. Staff reeemmends as a provision of Me A! that a stmet is • "Because of the parcel configuration within Old Town,development is not subject to the Mixed Use standards listed herein." The subject property is not located in Old Town, therefore, this item is not applicable. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in MU-R areas, per the Comprehensive Plan(pgs.3-16 thru 3-17): Page 10 Page 152 Item#7. • Development should generally comply with the general guidelines for development in all Mixed Use areas. Staffs analysis on the proposed project's compliance with these guidelines is included above. these guideU*es-. • Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 10%of the development area at gross densities ranging from 6 to 40 units/acre. There is neither a minimum nor maximum imposed on non- retail commercial uses such as office, clean industry, or entertainment uses. Multi family uses are proposed at a density of 16.6 units/acre for approximately 27%of the mixed use development area. Non-retail medical office/hospital uses are proposed on the remainder of the mixed use development. • Retail commercial uses should comprise a maximum of 50%of the development area. #e�Retail/restaurant commercial uses (10,000+/-square feet) are proposed on the entire first floor of the medical office building. Because this site is proposed to develop with a medical campus including a regional hospital, retail uses will be minimal but should be provided as a third land use type as desired in mixed use designated areas as discussed above to serve patrons and residents. Where the development proposes public and quasi-public uses to support the development,the developer may be eligible for additional area for retail development(beyond the allowed 50%), based on the ratios below: • For land that is designated for a public use, such as a library or school,the developer is eligible for a 2:1 bonus. That is to say,if there is a one-acre library site planned and dedicated,the project would be eligible for two additional acres of retail development. • For active open space or passive recreation areas, such as a park,tot-lot, or playfield,the developer is eligible for a 2:1 bonus. That is to say, if the park is 10 acres in area,the site would be eligible for 20 additional acres of retail development. • For plazas that are integrated into a retail project,the developer would be eligible for a 6:1 bonus. Such plazas should provide a focal point(such as a fountain, statue, and water feature), seating areas, and some weather protection. That would mean that by providing a half-acre plaza,the developer would be eligible for three additional acres of retail development. This guideline is not applicable as no public/quasi-public uses are proposed in the MU-R designated area. Staff believes the proposed development plan is generally consistent with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan if a commercial(i.e. retail, restaurant, etc.) component is included in the mixed use designated portion of the development as discussed above. VI. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ANALYSIS(UDC) A. Annexation & Zoning: The proposed annexation area consists of si-x-ten(6 10)parcels of land totaling 122.8 128.21 acres designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map(FLUM)as Medium Density Residential(MDR) and Mixed Use—Regional(MU-R). Per the proposed conceptual Master Plans included in Section VIII.A, single-family residential attached and detached homes,townhomes, multi-family apartments and a medical campus featuring a regional hospital and medical office Page 11 Page 153 Item#7. building with retail and restaurant uses is proposed to develop on this site. As dise ss a .,L.oy Staff recommends commereial •Fetail, restaurant, ete.) uses are also provided as p in the C G zoned area as desired in Alixed Use and speeifleally MU R designated areas to serve the employment area and adjaeent neighbffhOod. The medical campus is proposed to include"boutique"medical services geared toward women's health and pediatrics. Two buildings are proposed—a 4 3-story 220,000 181,000+/-square foot (s.f.)hospital with approximately 90 60 in-patient beds and a 44 4-story 90,000 80,000+/- s.f. medical office building which is proposed to include 10,000+/-square feet of retail uses and 10,000+/- square feet of restaurant uses on the entire first floor. Most services anticipated to be performed in the hospital will be out-patient procedures. Areas not used for inpatient beds will be used for surgery,radiology, an emergency department, labor rooms,physical plant and a cafeteria. The hospital is proposed to be similar in scope and size to the St. Luke's and St. Al's campuses in Nampa. West Ada School District plans to develop a public school on the eastern portion of the annexation area separate from this development. The parcel was included in the subject AZ and PP applications because it was created outside of the process required by Ada County to create a buildable parcel. Including it in the proposed plat will allow building permits to be obtained for future development. The single-family attached/detached portion of the development is proposed to be annexed with R-8 zoning(99.53 acres),the townhome and multi-family portions are proposed to be zoned R-15 (8.82 acres)and the medical campus is proposed to be zoned C-G(18.1:7 19.85 acres, including adjacent right-of-way to the section line of W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26),which is generally consistent with the associated MDR and MU-R FLUM designations for the site as discussed above in Section V (see zoning exhibit in Section VIII.B). Proposed Use Analysis: Single-family attached and detached homes and townhouse dwellings are listed as a principal permitted use in the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts;multi-family developments are listed as a conditional use in the R-15 zoning district, subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27; and public education institutions are listed as a conditional use in the R-8 zoning district per the Allowed Uses in the Residential Districts table in UDC Table 11-2A-2, subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-14. A hospital is listed as a conditional use in the C-G district, subject to the specific use standards in UDC 11-4-3-22;and healthcare and social services is listed as a principal permitted use in the C-G district;retail uses are listed as a principal permitted use in the C-G district; and restaurant uses are listed as a principal permitted use in the C-G district, subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-49 per the Allowed Uses in the Commercial Districts table in UDC 11-2B-2. Evaluation of the multi-family development for consistency with the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27 and the hospital's consistency with the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3- 22 will occur with the conditional use permit applications for such uses. One of the standards for hospitals that provide emergency care requires that the location shall have direct access on an arterial street; the proposed hospital is planned to provide emergency care.Because UDC 11- 3H-4B.2 prohibits new approaches directly accessing a State Highway,access is proposed via N.Rustic Oak Way, a collector street,at the project's east boundary located at the half mile mark between section line roads. The City Council should determine if this meets the intent of the requirement,if so, it should be memorialized in the Development Agreement. If not, Alternatively, Council may deny the emergency care component of the hospital use. Note:ITD denied the Applicant's request for access via SH 2O-26/Chinden Blvd. for the medical campus. Page 12 Page 154 Item#7. The property is within the Area of City Impact Boundary(AOCI). A legal description for the annexation area is included in Section VIII.B. The City may require a development agreement(DA) in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. In order to ensure the site develops as proposed with this application and future development meets the Mixed Use and specifically the MU-R guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan, Staff recommends a DA as a requirement of annexation with the provisions included in Section VIII.A. The DA is required to be signed by the property owner(s)/developer and returned to the City within 6 months of the Council granting the annexation for approval by City Council and subsequent recordation. The Applicant requests three(3)separate DA's are required—one for the R-8 and R-15 residential portions of the development, one for the medical campus and another for the school district's parcel. Staff is amenable to this request as there are three(3)distinct components of the project. B. Preliminary Plat: The proposed preliminary plat consists of 433 422 lots—3953777 371 buildable lots [316 single-family residential(94-102 attached 215/detached),6-3,38 townhome, 14 multi-family residential, 1 commercial and 1 school],3-2 39 42 common lots and 6 other(shared driveway)lots on "�423-54 124.81 acres of land in the proposed R-8,R-15 and C-G zoning districts. A portion of the proposed plat is a re-subdivision of Lot 18,Block 1,Peregrine Heights Subdivision, a formerly deed restricted agricultural lot that was only to be used for open space(i.e. non-farm)— this restriction has since expired. The minimum lot size proposed in the single-family residential portion of the development is 4,000 square feet(s.f.)with an average lot size of 6-,060 5,982 s.£; the average townhome lot size is 2-,037 2,302 s.f. The overall gross density is 3-6-3 2.97 units/acre with a net density of 7.M 7.68 units/acre. The gross density of the R-8 zoned portion is 4.P 3.07 units/acre with a net density of 7417.07 units/acre and the gross density of the R-15 zoned portion is 12.97 7.57 units/acre with a net density of 21.33 13.8 units/acre consistent with the density desired in the associated MDR&MU-R FLUM designations in the Comprehensive Plan for this site. Phasing: The residential portion of the subdivision is proposed to develop in nine(9)phases as depicted on the phasing exhibit in Section VIII.0 over a time period of 4 to 5 years. The north/south collector street will be constructed from W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 in alignment with Pollard Ln. across Chinden Blvd. to the north and extend to the southern boundary with the first phase of development. The single family portion of the site will develop first,followed by the townhomes and then the multi-family apartments. The school property(Lot 84, Block 12)are is not included in the phasing plan as they are it is under separate ownership and will develop separately from the residential and commercial portions of the development. The Applicant estimates development of the hospital and medical campus will commence in 2021 at the earliest; and the school in 2023 at the earliest, assuming services are available. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There is an existing home on the Kuenzli property and some old accessory structures on the Roark property that are proposed to be removed with development. All existing structures should be removed prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer for the phase in which they are located. Page 13 Page 155 Item#7. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): Development of the subject property is required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-6 for the R-8 district, 11-2A-7 for the R-15 district and 11-2B-3 for the C-G district as applicable. Lot Layout: The lot layout/development plan for the townhome portion of the development on Lots 16-7-9-, common driveway may only serve a maximum of(6) dwelling units peir UD 6-C units are proposed off each . Private streets are not intended for townhome developments other than those than create a common mew through the site design or that propose a limited gated development-neither a mews nor is proposed but no gates are proposed(alter-native compliance i thiss standard see analysis below in Section 3*71•r hearing.AlteFnaflve Complianee may be requested to these standaFds and apffOved upon recommendation of the City Engineer-,Fire Marshal and the Director when the Applicant can demonstrate than the proposed over-ail design meets or exceeds the intent of the required standards and shall not be detrimental to the publie health, safety and welf-AFe and where private streets are determined to enhance the safety of the development by establishing a clear emergency vehiele travel lane. However,the Fire Dept. and Staff would not be in suppo sueh a request as Staff is of the opinioll M. - . - Meh at the number- of units and density PFOPosed would result in a neighbor-hood that is seveFely undeF par-lied,whieh eould be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare if emerge ' ver-e not able aeeess homes within the development due to parking issues on the private street. Staff Feeommends this POFOOH of the development is Fedesigned with publie stFeets (alleys and/or common driveways may be incorporated), or if private streets are proposed, eaeh unit should&ont on and be aeeessed via the private street(s) and the design should inelude a mew or-gated entr-y in aeeoM with UDC 11 3F I however-,publie streets are preferred. Alter-natively, a multi family development(i.e. one structure on one property with 3 or more dwelling units)with townhome style units might be a development option for-this area.A Y-evised par-king plan should be submitted for-this area as well that pr-ovides for adequate guest par-king above the minimum UDC standards (Table 11 3C- 6)to serwe this portion of the development.A revised eoneept plan and par-king plan should be submitted prior-to or-a Commission hearing for-review and a revised plat should be submitted at least 10 days p to the City Couneil hearing that r-efleets this modifleation. The lot layout/development plan for-the multi family development on Lots 70 83,Bloek 12 depiets parking and aeeess dr-iveways on buildable iots the number of par! with eaeh lot and are not eommensur-ate with the par-king required foff-e-aeh hffl--�- with an ingress egress/par-king easement for-eaeh buildable lot.A Fevised plat should be submitted at least 10 days prior-to the City Coune&1 A revised plat was submitted that depicts the private street in the townhome portion of the development within a common lot as requested, see Section VIIL C. Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards (UDC 11-6C-3) Development of the subdivision is required to comply with the subdivision design and improvement standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3, including but not limited to streets, common driveways and block face. Page 14 Page 156 Item#7. Block length is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3F. Block faces should not exceed 750' in length without an intersecting street or alley unless a pedestrian connection is provided,then the block face may be extended up to 1,000' in length. The face of Block 7 on the south side of W. Smokejumper St. exceeds 750' at approximately 900'+/-;because the preliminary plat for the abutting property to the south did not include a pathway to this site in this location, Staff does not recommend a pathway is required for connectivity as it would dead-end at the subdivision boundary. Other block faces comply with the standard. Common driveways are required to be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11- 6C-3D.A perpetual ingress/egress easement shall be filed with the Ada County Recorder, which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. An exhibit should be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks,fencing,building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via the common driveway; if a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street,the driveway should be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway.Address signage should be provided at the public street for homes accessed via common driveways for emergency wayfinding purposes. Access(UDC 11-3A-3) Access is proposed via one(1) collector street(N. Rustic Oak Way)from W. Chinden Blvd./SH 20- 26,which extends through the site to the south boundary and will eventually extend to McMillan Rd.with development of The Oaks North subdivision to the south.A local street access (W. Sturgill Peak St.)is proposed via N.McDermott Rd., a collector street, at the project's west boundary. A stub street(N. Jumpspot Ave.) is proposed to the out-parcel at the southwest corner of the site— Staff recommends W. Smokejumber St. is also stubbed to this property from the east;two (2) stub streets(N. Trident Ave. and N. Rustic Oak Way) are proposed to the south for future extension with The Oaks North subdivision; and two(2) stub streets(N. Serenity Ave. &W. Fireline Ct.) are proposed to the north for future extension—the stub street to Serenity Ln.will serve as an emergency access only to Peregrine Heights Subdivision and will have bollards preventing public access.A collector street(W. Ramblin St.)is proposed for access to the school site. A stub street (Sunfield Way)was approved with The Oaks North preliminary plat to Lot 37,Block 12,proposed as a common lot;this street is not proposed to be extended. The ACHD report states Sunfield Way cannot be extended into the site at this time as the stub street is aligned with the parcel line between this site and the school parcel.ACHD has required a permanent right-of-way easement to be provided and a road trust for the future extension of Sunfield Way with development of the school parcel. Cross-access/ingress-egress easements should be provided to adjacent MU-R designated properties to the west(Parcels#R6991221700&R6991221600) and east(Parcel# R6991222101)in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A.2. As discussed above,a private street loop(N.Highfire Loop)is proposed for access to the townhome portion of the development in Block 8 adjacent to the southern boundary of the commercial development(see analysis below under Private Streets). Staff is not supportive of the proposed revised design and r-eeommends revisions to the plan as stated above and in 8 e re t-*aq INI EX.A. The Applicant's proposal to curve McDermott Rd. north of Sturgill Peak St.to the east at the project's west boundary does not meet ACHD policy and is not approved; the ACHD report states construction of this portion of McDermott will be completed in conjunction with ITD's SH-16 extension. Page 15 Page 157 Item#7. Developments along SH 2O-26 are required to construct a street generally paralleling the state highway that is no closer than 660 linear feet(measured from centerline to centerline)from the intersection(i.e.Rustic Oak)with the state highway.The purpose of which is to provide future connectivity and access to all properties fronting the state highway that lie between the subject property and the nearest section line road and/or half mile collector road.The street shall be designed in accord with the standards set forth in UDC 11-3H-4B.3 and shall collect and distribute traffic.Frontage streets or private streets may be considered by the council at the time of property annexation or through the conditional use process.Frontage streets and private streets shall be limited to areas where there is sufficient access to surrounding properties and a public street is not desirable in that location. A frontage road is proposed along the northern boundary of the site adjacent to Chinden Blvd. with an access on Rustic Oak approximately 660' south of Chinden as depicted on the conceptual development plan in Section VIII.A.Because residential homes exist to the west that are not likely to redevelop in the near future,a future interchange for SH-16 is planned east of the McDermott/Chinden intersection, and a north/south collector street(Rustic Oak) exists along the east boundary of this site, Staff believes there is sufficient access to surrounding properties as proposed without the provision of a public street. Emergency access:In response to the Fire Department's estimated response time to the development, which are below the target goal on the McDermott side of the subdivision, the Applicant plans to include an AED(Automated External Defibrillator)device in the clubhouse and provide education related to the use of the device to ensure residents are aware of the benefits and function if the device is needed. Additionally, a connection is proposed from Chinden through the project to the southern boundary of the subdivision with the first phase of development to aid in emergency response times to the site; this should also benefit response times to The Oaks North to the south. Parking(UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided for residential uses in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6; and for non-residential uses in accord with the standards listed in 11-3C- 6B.1. Future development should comply with these standards. A parking exhibit(and details in the narrative)was submitted with this application, included in Section VIILF that depicts 46 15 extra off-street parking spaces in the townhome portion of the development and a total of 505 497 on- street parking spaces available for guest parking. A total of 16 off-street parking spaces are proposed for the 3,750+/-square foot clubhouse and swimming pool facility. Staff is of the opinion the proposed parking in the single-family and townhomes portions of the development should meet the parking needs. Off-street parking in the multi-family portion of the development will be evaluated with the conditional use permit application. Off-street parkin is s required to be provided for the commercial portion of the development in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-6B for commercial uses with the exception of restaurant uses; off-street parking for restaurant uses is required per the standards listed in UDC II- 4-3-49. Off-street parkin is s depicted on the conceptual Master Plan in accord with these standards and will reviewed again with the final design of the site to ensure consistency with these standards. Pathways(UDC 11-3A-8): The Pathways Master Plan depicts segments of the City's multi-use pathway system across this site. In accord with the Plan,the Park's Dept. recommends detached 10' wide multi-use pathways are provided within the street buffers in the following locations: along N. McDermott Rd.,W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26,the east side of N. Rustic Oak Way from Chinden to the southern boundary of the site, and along W. Ramblin St. from Rustic Oak to the school site. These pathways are required to be placed in a 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement. Page 16 Page 158 Item#7. Other pathways and micro-paths through common areas are also proposed for pedestrian interconnectivity and access within the development. Two(2)micro-path connections to the school site are proposed in addition to the multi-use pathway connection from Rustic Oak that extends along the northern boundary of the multi-family development. All pathways shall be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8 and landscaping shall be provided on either side of the pathways as set forth in UDC 11-3B-12C. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-1 : Detached sidewalks are required to be provided along all arterial and collector streets; attached(or detached) sidewalks may be provided along internal local streets. Sidewalks are proposed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17, ept f r along the east side of Rustie Oak north o W. Lost Rapids St.,where an attaehed 7' wide sidewalk is proposed. This sidewalk should be detac-hCd from the in aeeor-i-"with iTcir v C 11 3A rr. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-1 : Eight-foot wide parkways are proposed adjacent to the north/south collector street(N. Rustic Oak Way) and are required to be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17 and landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C.AWe. The MN.. eo- Plat ine!Hded Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): Street buffers are required to be provided within the development as follows: a 35-foot wide street buffer is required along W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 and N. McDermott Rd., an entryway corridor; and a 20' wide buffer is required along N. Rustic Oak Way,'`T N 4ef ffm t D a. and W. Ramblin St., collector streets, landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. A 25' wide buffer is required on the C-G zoned property to residential uses as set forth in UDC Table 11-2B-3, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-9C. The buffer area should be comprised of a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs, lawn or other vegetative groundcover that results in a barrier that allowed trees to touch at the time of maturity. A 30-foot wide buffer is proposed with dense landscaping along the western and southern boundaries of the site adjacent to residential uses as required. Parkways where provided are required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. The total linear feet of parkways with the required and proposed number of trees should be included in the Landscape Calculations table on the final plat landscape plan to demonstrate compliance with the required standards. Landscaping is required along all pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C. The total lineal feet of pathways with the required and proposed number of trees should be included in the Landscape Calculations table on the final plat landscape plan to demonstrate compliance with UDC standards. Common open space is required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G- 3E. The total square footage of common open space with the required and proposed number of trees should be included in the Landscape Calculations table on the final plat landscape plan to demonstrate compliance with the UDC standards. Parking lot landscaping is required to be provided in the commercial portion of the development in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-8C. If any existing trees on the site are proposed to be removed,mitigation may be required per the standards listed in UDC 11-313-1OC.5. The Applicant should coordinate with Matt Perkins, Page 17 Page 159 Item#7. the City Arborist,to determine mitigation requirements if any existing trees are not proposed to be retained on site. Noise abatement is required to be provided in the form of a berm or a berm and wall combination parallel to W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3H-4D. A detail/cross-section of the proposed noise abatement should be submitted with the final plat application for the commercial portion of the development that demonstrates compliance with the required standards. Qualified Open Space(UDC 11-3G1: A minimum of 10%qualified open space meeting the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B is required for the residential portion of the development. Based on 105.08 80.42 acres (excluding the 28-acre school parcel), a minimum of 40.5f 8.04 acres of qualified open space should be provided. A qualified open space exhibit was submitted, included in Section VIII.E,that depicts 11.56 12.4 acres(or 44-.9 15.41%, excluding the 28-acre school parcel) of open space consisting of the entire buffer along collector streets(McDermott&Rustic Oak), open space areas of at least 50' x 100' in area and linear open space in accord with UDC standards. Note:Although a couple of the lots (i.e. Lot 30, Block 1 and Lot 29, Block 9) counted toward qualified open space don't meet the minimum dimensional standards of 50'x 100', the rest of the area does qualify which still exceeds the minimum standards. Because the multi-family portion of the development is proposed to be subdivided with each 4- plex on its own individual lot for the option of separate ownership of the 4-plex buildings, Staff recommends a provision is included in the DA that requires one management company handle the leasing and maintenance of the entire project to ensure better overall consistent management of the development. Qualified Site Amenities(UDC 11-3G1 A minimum of(1)site amenity is required for every 20 acres of development area. Based on the residential area of the proposed plat(105.09 80.42 acres), a minimum of€rve four(5 4)qualified site amenities are required to be provided per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3C. A site amenity exhibit and renderings are included in Section VIII.E. A 3,750+/- square foot clubhouse with restrooms, an exercise area, office and meeting room with an outdoor patio and a 54' x 30'+/-swimming pool, one large tot lot on Lot 1,Block 9 and(2) smaller tot lots on Lot 1,Block 13 and Lot 12,Block 6 with children's play equipment, an enclosed 5,500+/- s.f. dog park(although this area may be just a pocket park with no dog facilities depending on what is desired by future residents), segments of the City's multi-use regional pathway system, and additional qualified open space exceeding 20,000 square feet are proposed as amenities in excess of UDC standards.Amenities are proposed from the following categories listed in UDC 1I- 3G-3C: quality of life,recreation and pedestrian or bicycle circulation system, in accord with UDC standards. Details of these amenities should be submitted with the final plat applications for the phases in which they are located. Storm Drainage(UDC 11-3A-IS): An adequate storm drainage system is required in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. Design and construction shall follow Best Management Practice as adopted by the City. Sub-surface drainage is proposed but swales could be incorporated if needed. Page 18 Page 160 Item#7. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-15): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided in each development as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. This property is within the Settler's Irrigation District and the Nampa& Meridian Irrigation District's boundaries. Waterways(UDC 11-3A- : The West Tap Sublateral runs east/west across the southern portion of this site within a 20' wide drainage district easement;and a 15' wide irrigation easement runs east/west across the northern portion of the site as depicted on the Peregrine Heights subdivision plat. This waterway is planned to be relocated and piped. If the easement(s)for the waterway is greater than 10' in width,it should be placed in a common lot that is a minimum of 20' in width and outside of a fenced area,unless modified by City Council in accord with UDC 11-3A-6E. All waterways are required to be piped unless used as a water amenity of linear open space as defined in UDC 11-1A-1 in accord with UDC 11-3A-6B. Fencing(UDC 11-3A- : All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6C and 11-3A-7. Fencing is depicted on the landscape plan. Fences abutting pathways and common open space lots not entirely visible from a public street is required to be an open vision or semi-private fence up to 6' in height as it provides visibility from adjacent homes or buildings per UDC 11-3A-7A.7. Staff is concerned there is not enough visibility from the street of the common area on Lot 1,Block 2 located behind building lots and around Lot 37,Block 12 and recommends the fencing type is revised on the perimeter of these lots to comply with this standard. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): The Applicant submitted sample photo elevations and renderings of the different home types planned to be constructed in this development which are included in Section VIII.G.Homes depicted are a mix of I-and 2-story units of varying sizes for the variety of lot sizes proposed. Building materials consist of a mix of finish materials with stoneibrick veneer accents. Because the side and/or rear of 2-story homes that face collector streets(i.e.N.McDermott Rd.,N.Rustic Oak Way and W.Ramblin St.)will be highly visible,these elevations,should incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g. projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street.Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. Conceptual renderings of the hospital and medical office buildings were submitted as shown in Section VIII.G. The hospital is proposed to be a 3-story building and the medical office building a 4-story building. The elevations for the medical office building incorrectly depict a 3-story building; these elevations should be revised prior to the City Council hearing to reflect the correct number of stories. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted and approved prior to submittal of any building permit applications for the medical office building, hospital,clubhouse, swimming pool facility, single-family attached,townhome and multi-family structures. The design of such is required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual.Design review is not required for single-family detached homes. Page 19 Page 161 Item#7. C. Private Streets (UDC H- A private street loop(N. Highfire Loop)is proposed for access within the portion of the development where townhomes are proposed on Lots 17 78 17-44 and 54-67,Block 8 adjacent to the southern boundary of the commercial development. The Applicant believes a private street in this area will enhance safety and vehicular circulation by creating a clear path of travel for emergency vehicles and residential traffic. Mews nor^ gated developme t A mew is proposed but no gates are proposed as the Applicant believes a gate would detract from site circulation and would physically and figuratively disjoint the townhomes from the rest of the community. Private streets are not intended for townhome developments other than those that create a common mew through the site design or that propose a limited gated residential development per UDC 1I- 3F-1. The applicability may be extended where the Director or Fire Marshall determines that private streets will enhance the safety of the development. The Applicant t requests alternative^ rrianee to UPC 11 3F I to " t development as Ion e , thout (s) or agated �Alternative -�a�=o��v- �cc�=���r��c� � Compliance is no longer necessary as a mew is proposed on the revised plan. As noted above in Seetion AILB,Lot Layout, Staff r-eeommends ehanges to the layout of the portion of the plat where the private street is proposed. Staff and the Fire Dept. does n believe safety is enhaneed by the provision of a private street in this area with the density and likelihood of vehieles parking iH fiFe lanes due to inadequaey of par-ling for guests and overflow par-ling. TheFefffe, Staff does no!reeommend approval of the private street as redesign. D. AlteMative Complianee (UDC- 11 B-�} belief that the townhome poftion eft the--,�-P-,Velepment will better-in4egr-ate with the rest of the Pr-esee#Ridge eomffmnity and will be easily aeoessible and usable without a gated eatFy a-Rd will pr-evide a safer-path of travel for-emer-geney vehieles, Reeause Staff is not supportive of the proposed design of the townhome portion of the development with the private street, Staff is in turn not suppor-five of the request for- alter-native eomplianee.As noted abolve in Seetion ALLB,Lot Layout, Staff Feeommends ehanges to the layout of this portion of the plat.A subsequent request may be eonsider-ed if warranted by the .Because a mew is now proposed on the revised plans, alternative compliance is no longer necessary. VII. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation and zoning with the requirement of a Development Agreement and approval of the requested preliminary plat with the conditions noted in Section IX.A and denial of the request for a private street and alternative compliance per the Findings in Section X. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on(continued from July 16t'and August 20t1i September 17,2020.At the public hearing,the Commission moved to continue the subject AZ and PP requests to a subsequent Commission hearing in order for the Applicant to revise the concept plan for the commercial/medical campus and plat for the townhome portion of the development. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ Page 20 Page 162 Item#7. a. In favor: Stephanie Leonard,KM Engineering&Patrick Connor(Applicant's Representative); Betsy Huntsin e�presenting the proposed hospital, Randall Peterman(adjacent property owner),Mitch Armuth,Providence Properties b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Val Stack and Paul Hoyer; Sue Ropski; Cory Coltrin; Randall Peterman d. Written testimony: Josh Femreite, Chief of New Schools for Gem Innovation Schools e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: Joe Bon ig orno 2. Key issue(s) testimony a. Gem Innovation School is in strong support of the project as their future campus lies aqpproximately 300 yards to the south and will be able to provide K-12 public education options for future residents; b. Would like 30' buffer extended along entire east and south boundaries of Pere rg ine Heights Subdivision for a buffer to higher density residential uses; would like more of a transition to the lots at the southeast corner of Peregrine Heights Subdivision either with larger lots or common area instead of 5 building lots; not in favor of proposed access via Serenity Ln.; concern pertaining to future access for Serenity Ln.residents via Chinden; concern pertaining to obstruction of view sheds with proposed 4-story structures on commercial portion of development. C. Ms. Ropski's concern with location of trash dumpsters and parking ad to their ro e d. Preference for the hospital to be located closer to the Chinden/Rustic Oak intersection away from low density residential lots at west boundary e. Mr. Peterman is in favor of the proposed development as it will bring services to his property for development. 3. Ke, ids)of discussion by Commission: a. Preference for owner-occupied townhomes rather than rental or more multi-family in the portion currently proposed for townhomes; b. Preference for the Applicant to obtain the out-parcel at northeast corner of site in order to develop commercial(retail,restaurant, etc.)uses on the site, C. In favor of the variety in housing types and lot sizes proposed; d. Not in favor of the proposed design of the townhome portion of the development and the private streets—needs to be redesigned; e. The Fire Dept.'s preference for a direct unhindered access to the site via Serenity (i.e.not obstructed byagate,bollards or a chain) pposed to right-in/right-out at Serenity Ln./Chinden Blvd. as a fire engine will not be able to access the site from the east via Chinden. f. Conceptual development plan for the commercial/medical campus portion of the site needs to be revised as discussed. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. None C. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items again on October 22'. At the public hearing on October 22',the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_: a. In favor: Patrick Connor,Providence Properties (Applicant's Representative);Betsy Huntsin eg r,representing the proposed hospital b. In opposition: None Page 21 Page 163 Item#7. C. Commenting: Cary Pitman; Sue Ropski;Val Stack; Doug Haneborg; Heidi Wilson; Charles Hay; Bonnie Layton,WH Pacific(representing property owner to the west of Pere rgrine Hei hts d. Written testimony:None e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. Preference for the parking on the east side of the 3-story medical office buildingto o be relocated to the west side of the building and the building shifted further to the east so that the building is further away from adjacent residential properties; b. Concern pertaining to traffic on Serenity Ln. if it were to be open to the south and the safety of children as there are no sidewalks along the private street; C. Concern pertaining to future restriction of right-in/right-out access to Serenity Ln. from Chinden Blvd. and resulting delays for emergency services to Peregrine Heights; C. Request for provision of a fence or a gate at the south end of the Serenity Ln. cul-de-sac to keep it private-, d. Request for the larger estate lots that abut the south end of Peregrine Heights to be carried over to the south side of W. Tanker Dr.; e. Property owner to the west of Peregrine Heights is in favor of the proposed frontage road along Chinden Blvd. for access to the collector street. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. The provision of an electronic gate at the south end of Serenity Ln. for emergency access to Peregrine Heights and to keep the lane private; b. Impacts to the design of the site if the outparcel at the northeast corner of the site isn't purchased by the Developer and developed as part of this site; C. Trash enclosures should be located away from adjacent residential properties; d. In support of the reduction in height from 4-to 3-stories for the hospital and medical office building; e. Preference for the medical office building to be shifted further to the east and/or rotated; f. The provision of only one(1)mew in the townhome portion of the development. f. In general support of the revisions made to the concept plan for the commercial portion of the development. h. Would like the Applicant to work with ITD on noise abatement along the west boundary adjacent to SH-16; i. In favor of the walkability of the development and especially the medical campus; hi support of the changes to the townhome portion of the development and the additional open space; k. Would like the Applicant to work with Staff to reduce the number of lots along the southern boundary of the subdivision to provide a better transition to planned R-4 zoned lots in The Oaks subdivision. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Requirement for noise abatement to be provided along the project's west boundary along N. McDermott Rd. adjacent to the future extension of SH-16 (see Section IX.A.la.7 and A.3a); b. Relocate the parking on the east side of the medical office building to the west side of the building and shift the building further to the east away from the adjacent residential properties(see revised concept plans in Section VIII.A); C. The Applicant shall work with Staff to provide an electronic,gate that is approved by the Fire Dept. for access to Serenity Ln. from the south(see DA provision#A.la.6 in Section IX); and, Page 22 Page 164 Item#7. d. Reduce the number of lots along the southern boundary to provide better transition to the R- 4 properties planned to the south in The Oaks subdivision(lots were reduced by 5 along the south and southeast boundaries, see revised plat in Section VIII.C). 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. Council should determine if the proposed access to the hospital via N. Rustic Oak Way, a collector street, meets the intent of the UDC(11-4-3-22),which requires hospitals that provide emergency care to have direct access on an arterial street.ITD denied a request for direct access via Chinden Blvd. for the emergency care component of the hospital per the letter to the Applicant dated May 5. 2020 included in the public record. Alternatively, Council may deny the emergency care component of the hospital use. D. The Meridian City Council heard these items on December 1,2020.At the public hearing the Council moved to remand the project back to the Commission in order for the out-parcel at the northeast corner of the site to be included in the annexation area and development plan for the site. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Patrick Connor,Providence Properties and Stephanie Leonard,KM Engineering(Applicant's Representatives) b. In opposition.None c. Commenting: Cary Pitman;Doug Haneborg; Cory Coltrin d. Written testimony: Randall Peterman(in favor) e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: Clint Dolsbv, Joe Bongiorno, Steve Sjddoway 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Concern pertaining to the width of the frontage road and access to site from Serenity b. Preference for the hospital to be shifted as far east as possible away from adjacent residents—concern that the 3-story building will overlook the rear yard of adjacent residential properties; c. Desire for a gated entrance to the medical campus portion of the site from Serenity Ln. to prohibit public access/traffic on Serenity Ln.; d. Concerns pertaining to light trespass on adjacent residential properties from the medical campus;noise; odors;need for more of a transition in lot sizes to lot at the southeast corner of Peregrine Heights where there are 4:1 lots proposed; concern pertaining to Fire Dept.response time; location of water& sewer stubs to Peregrine Heights; location of fire hydrants in relation to Peregrine Heights. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Fire response time to the site: b. Subdivision of the multi-family portion of the site allowingfor or separate ownership of individual apartment structures and concern pertaining to consistent exterior maintenance—should maintenance be governed by the HOA instead of a property management company to ensure consistent and timely pkeep of the development? C. Preference for the out-parcel at the northeast corner of the site to be included in the annexation area and development plan for the site. Council is not in favor of annexing the medical campus portion of the site without the out-parcel;remand back to the Commission for inclusion of the out-parcel in the annexation application. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. None Page 23 Page 165 Item#7. E. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on January 21,2021. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Patrick Connor,Providence Properties; Stephanie Hopkins,KM Engineering (Applicant's Representative) b. In opposition: Cory Coltrin c. Commenting: James Jacobson,Attornerepresentin_ Peregrine Heights Homeowner's Association, Sue Ropski; Cary Pitman; Doug Haneborg d. Written testimony: Stephanie Hopkins,Applicant's Representative(response to the staff re ort e. Staff presenting gpplication: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. Opposed to development of a medical campus directly ad to Peregrine Heights residential subdivision and request for C-G zoning to be denied; b. Concerns pertaining to where medical waste containers will be located, location of loading docks next to residential,opposed to 4-story medical office building structure which will obstruct views,location of frontage road/emergency access along north boundary of Peregrine Heights Subdivision from Chinden Blvd.; c. Not enough buffer between existing residential properties and proposed commercial development; d. Objections to a frontage road/emergency access driveway at the north end of Pere rg ire Heights subdivision along Chinden Blvd.; e. Concern pertaining to lightpass from the commercial site on the adjacent residential properties; e. Clarification from the Applicant that this is not a trauma center—most business will be related to women's health procedures and not emergency services. 3. Ke. ids)of discussion by Commission. a. Supportive of the continued changes that have made to the development plan by the Developer at the request of Staff and the neighbors; b. In favor of the proposed medical campus in this location of the City and belief it's an appropriate use for the MU-R desi Hated property, c. Empathy for the impacts to the residential property owners adjacent to MU-R designated property and proposed commercial development; 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Add requirement for the buffer along the west boundary of the site to incorporate a 2- foot tall berm with an 8-foot tall wall on top of the berm to assist in blocking the noise from the commercial development. This requirement is contingent upon approval from the Peregrine Heights HOA; otherwise,if not approved by the HOA, landscaping and the wall shall be installed as proposed on the concept plan(see DA provision#A.lb.9 in Section IX). 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. Council should determine if the proposed access to the hospital via N. Rustic Oak Way, a collector street,meets the intent of the UDC(11-4-3-22),which requires hospitals that provide emergency care to have direct access on an arterial street.ITD denied a request for direct access via Chinden Blvd. for the emergency care component of the hospital per the letter to the Applicant dated May S, 2020 included in the public record. Alternatively, Council may deny the emergency care component of the hospital use. Page 24 Page 166 Item#7. C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on February 23,April 13.and May 18,2021. At the public hearing on May 18',the Council moved to approve the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing a. In favor: Patrick Connor,Providence Properties; Stephanie Hopkins,KM Engineering b. In opposition:None c. Commenting: Sue Ropski:Kristy Inselman,ACHD: Val Stack d. Written testimony:None e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Concern pertaining to the frontage road and height of the proposed structures: b. Clarification on the number of rental properties allowed within the development(up to 20%)through the CC&R's: C. Concern pertaining to safety and access to the commercial portion of the site. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Concern pertaining to direction of potential legislation in regard to property taxes and hesitancy to move forward with this application until more information is known. Council moved to continue this application to April 13';public testimony will be limited to new information only- b. Differing opinions pertaining to whether or not the hospital should serve as a trauma center(with associated uses)with an emergency room—some reasons against were because access isn't available from an arterial street and because of impacts to residential neighbors(i.e.helicopters); 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. Council deemed access for the emergency room via Rustic Oak, a collector street,meets the intent of the requirement in UDC 11-4-3-22A for direct access to be provided on an arterial street; also,that the hospital would not pursue being designated as a trauma center. Page 25 Page 167 Item#7. VIII. EXHIBITS A. Master Plan Conceptual Rendering&Medical Campus Conceptual Development Plan-REVISED US-HIGHWAY 251CHINOEN BLVD a171 � -- PROPOSED , PRE SCOTT __ MEDICAL CAMPUS RIDGE MERIDIAN,IDAHn CONCEPRfA4 suaie.�rrocrrArv�e �.._ .,I�--- r --- - ILITURE i - SCHOOL SITE I o - HYTURE OAK5 NORTR SUBOIV1530N reposed Page 26 Page 168 Item#7. Concept Plan (dated: 1/19/211: SITE INFORMATION W.CIIINOEN�Cyp, SIiE utEA: 19.3+vAES Cn U.34a SF) wRRE.rr zaxlxa RUT PRCPOSEO MNING. C-G CVI�Gk�Nlyym PLWGEM 20NN6'. IaR(FAST.NEST,53x1H}/Nz R L-6(TpRIH) SF x x.nWxGs Noa fa sroxrl 2 Ill. V JIII RSTNE- •G,coo � 6�ESTwruur-'m°o�oo sF rns.ttEss { nx wuxnum Hosvxu C.erns) Euor.�•[Fn ice[ '•e_ �••. ,,,_� F'= L� f— = Q nn MM REWPM: WIOIHG --261.0 5F 1 - I:` •E — - = sEiNacNs R[n c� 2 m SPI.eeS �� X_ 'I f Vg REquREN ~� W READ 0 REauREG O W Itif�lll lII1Lnl r RIIIIII1Ilf11Illlllllll. sMrtE (auEceoRy 2.NaEourtID 9m ST4Esi IEMR2 LORR) ,15'REONRER _ Y xf In/wcln urt TO NESI�ENINL 25 xEOUNEe a a WNG HEICM: ss 2 ^v + rxs v $E3 GI HEIGHT: 53 — — uTNooR eu2A� Nrnlic zc� _ — - xOSRiAs Mrx SGIIxG NVArtu _ J Y arm 36 rya e� Ns�rA a HnWT cW WAIL � xs _ ut2m+�co••Ernox vo LL1l�J R I�1- ll111I E N G I N E E ES'�_N G km awrc via 8'HfRHT py NeIL -- P�'� b� �W / s� w 7 150300 450 Pi.. stale=1"=3.50' ��fAY mrar+66 Page 27 Page 169 Item#7. B. Annexation&Zoning Legal Descriptions and Exhibit Maps C-G HONING LEGEND ` — — —— — n Er —k-15 I I RUT o r °ma m R-1� o� I I RUT I �• lam ' R— ry G ry E E A I N G s _ 1 OF 1d r® J R-4 ��II RUT Lf— .. - LA=L _ _ `L7 6 300 607 R-8 R--A plan scale::"=7nr Page 28 Page 170 Item#7. km E H G r N E E R I N G December 17,2020 ProjKl:No.18.140 Exhibit A Legal Description for Annexation Rresratt Ridge Subdiv Mon A perreI of land situated I n a portion of the West 112 of the Northeast 1/4-0nd a pgil lark of the West 1/2 of Section 29,Township 4 North,Range 1 West, Doise Merldlan,Ada County,ldaha and heing mare particularly described as follows: Con rnerticing at an aluminum cap marking the Northwest tourer said Section 28, which bears N89'27'17"W a distance of 2,609.40 feet from irrl alurnlrtum cap marking the North 1/4 cornerof said Section 28, thence following the northerly line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 28, S89'27 L7"E A distance of 1,484.69 feet to tha POINT OF BEGINNING, Thence following said northerly liner 589'27'17"E a distance of 1,124.74 feet to said aluminurn Cap marking the North 1/4 corner; Thence leaving Said northerly line of said Northwest 114 and fellowirr�the northerly Ilne of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 213,5&9'25'25"E a distance of 60.00 feet to a paint; Thence leaving said northerly Ilne•SO0"43'55"W a distarkre of 558.89 feet to a point; 7herlce S89`24'23"E a distance of 1,24E.58 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar on the easterly We of the West 112 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 28; Thence fol lowirr$said easterly liner SW 6'13'W a distance of 1,615.76 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence Ieaving said easterly line, N77-58'17"W a distance of 1,33E-Z� feet to a 518•inch rebaran the easterPy line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 28; Thence following said easterly 114% S0O"43'55'W a distance of 625.95 feet to 2-inch plpe marking the Center 1/4 of said$et#ion 28; Thence la2vinLg said easterly line,S00'43'5:V W a distance of 24.35 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence S53'05'530W a distance of 16.53 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar, Thence N78'07'38"U4r a distance of 19.68 feet to a 5/9.inch rebar; 7hence 589%8'46"W a distance of45.49 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Than N$6°14'49"Ord a distance of 63.62 feet to a 5/Sinch rebar; 7hencia N88'50'0eW a distance of 85.57 feet to a 5/34rich rehsr; Thence N80'59'54'VV a distance of 36.99 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence N70`27'41"VV a distance of 25.64 feet to a 5J8-inch rebar; Thence S89'15'0O"W a distance of 20,04 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence N86'53'33"W a distance of 189,53 feet to a 5/8-Inch rebar; Thence 564-04'03"W a distance of 27.64 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence N89` A'25 UV a distance of 784.53 feet to a paint; -thence M0X5Z'21"E a distance of 16.96 feet to a point being the Center West 1/16 corner of said Section 2$; Thence fallowingfallowingwing the southerly IIne of:he Northwest 1/4 of said Section 28, N89°27'12"W a dk5oxe 0{ 686,O3 feet to a paint; Thence leaving said southerly line,N01'OD'37"E a distance of 400.00 feet to a paint; 9233 West Sta#s Stroet & Boise,PdO110 83714 * 208.538,5939 + kmvngllp.wrn Page 29 Page 171 Item#7. Thence N89'21'12"W a dl5tance of 625_-00 feet to a paint on the westerly line of the Northwest 1{4 of sold Section 28; Thence following said westerly line,I~01°00'37"E a d lstaoce of 690,74 feet t0 9 paint; Thence leaving said westerly line,S73'33'16"E a dlstance of 483.50 feet to a paint; Thence 578'W16"E a distance of WE feet to a point; Thence S46'W01"E a distance of 299,29 feet to a point;; Thence N75'51'12"E a distance of 48.11 Feet to a point; Thence N00'52'17"E a distance of 21S-98feet to a 1/2--inch rebar, Thence N7S'32'13'E a dis[we of 272.40 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; Thence 30-50 feet along the arc of a Jrcular curve to the left,said Curve having a radius of 45.00 feet,a delta angle of 38'56'33",a chard bea-iri8 of N75'n'S3"E and a Chord dEsta of 3Q_00 fleet to a 1/2-inch rebar; Thence N7532'13'E d distame of 219.13 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; Thence NOX32'13"E a distance of 1,497,29 feet to a V2-inch rebar, Thence 569'19'13"W a distance a#270.56 feet to a 1/2-Inch rebar; Thence N3VW35"W d distance of 8'-73 feet to a point; TherWe 53-14 feet along the arc of a[ircular curve to the right,said curve having d radius of 115.00 feet, 2 delta angle of 26'2WW,a chard bearing of K18'41'13"W and a chord distance of 52_67 feet to a 5/8- inch rebar; Thence N00'32'43'E a distance of 125.29 feet to the POINT 4F UEGINNING- Said parcel contains a total of 128.207 acres,more or less_ Attached hereto Is Exhibit B and by this reference is hereby n1 ade a part of. ST 12459 b ' OF % L SOX, Cilem Project Name PAGE i 2 Page 30 Page 172 Item#7. FWLAINUiA CFP p o POINT OF REGINNING N 1/4 CORNER t- BASIS 6F 8€ARING SECTION 28 ❑ C 20 21 W.Chinden BW{Hwy 20/26i CL ❑ _ _S89'27'17"E 2609,48' L7 ❑ 29 28 ia64.66' — — 1124.74' — — - _ _ '� u c m POINT OF COMMENCEMENT = ALUMINUMWW CORNER P L1B Mt9 tSST29�V23"E Q -1 SECTION 28 fl N rl P N (] � o � m r` 1248,58' C U) 2 Z W < Q} s H " tm + Cc ❑ C1` fV C 4 J O M� fl 250 500 1004 a w LLxJ a J O SCALE: 1"=540' Annexation Area 198.207±AC, 8 50428233640,R5991222210,S0428120950, ° ! S>v'33'}e SO428131315,SO428131200,R6991222101&S0428211102 o 4a Current Zoning:RUT d a '�0' S78•QS•Ts E tti� � a « v �8,77• 1.Sfi C} � Q 6 M1 548.68•U}"E J DATE: DEEEPABERPWQ PROJECT: U-IQ N89'21'12"W M7Tsa'T7 SHEET: 825.OQ' W 1 OF 2 o M1 b 40 _ O � 0 o CENTE(t-WESr }/16 DDRNER a OF SECTION 28 2 PIPE E CENTER OF S£C710N 28 z N8ff 2l'l2"W 68&03' f y y BRAS_ CAP LI N89'}4'25"W 789.53' �, — — W 1/4 CORNER km SECTION 28 r LID L9 ~ J' ENGro1EEAS-SURYEYOAS.AVNNERS 5233 VK5T STRTESTAEET L}1 L2 EIOISEr 1D M083714 �L12 L7 Lfi PNQN(I2osl(J9 5935 L6_— —1-4 L3 FAN WGI 6394910 Page 31 Page 173 Item#7. a � ,r a, `a e LINE TABLE LINE TABLE ° � zo LINE I BEARING I DISTANCE LINE BEARING DISTANCE ov Ll SOF25'25"E 60.00 L15 W52'17"E 215.98 t} Q L2 S743'51"W 24.35 L16 N75'32'131 272.40 i.3 553'05'5314 16.53 L17 147532'13"E 219-13 m L4 N75'07'381Y 18.t38 L18 S6Wl8'13'W 270.56 N „0 115 S8918'461W 45.49 L19 N31'55'3516 91.73 V) 2 z L6 N96'14'49"W 63-0 L20 1d0'32'43"E 125.29 Ku s L7 NBS'50'0419 85.57 I "6cc O La N60'59'54"W 36.69 t p ri a7 1-9 N70'27'4114 25.64 �1 C] N v L10 589'15'00'14 20.04 W 4 L1 1 N9B'S3'39"1V 1 89.53 >_ f L12 554"o4'o39A' 27-94 ~ L13 W52'21"E 16.96 C L14 N75'S1'12"E 48.41 i y O !Z +r � O CURVE TABLE DATE- DECEMBER 2020 CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA CNDRD BRG CHORD alaaEcr, M.14 01 45.00' 30.59' 38'56'33- N7932'13'E 30.00' SHEET: C2 115.U0' 53.14' 2E26'39- Nl8'4l'l3"W 52.67' 2 OF 2 !on ENGINEERS.SURYE1'W"NRERS 9233 WEST STATE STREET 09I541DAM 83714 PHONE12061639-CIM FA%I2m1 fiasco Page 32 Page 174 Item#7. km E N G I N E E R I N G December 17,2020 Project N.D.18-140 Exhibit A Legal Description for Rezurm t!]C-G Prescott Ridge Subdivision A parcel of land situated in a portion of Northwest 1/4 and a portion of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 7$,Tow nshlp 4 North, Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an aluminum Cap marking the Northwest corner said Section 28, which bears N89'27'17"W a distance of 2,609.40;eet frorrh an aluminum cap marking the North 1/4 cormrof said Sertlon 2$, thence following the northerly [ine of the Northwest 1{4 of said Section 28, M'22'17"E a distance of 1,484.66 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence following Bald northerly line,5S9'27'17"E a distance of 1.124.74 Feet to said aluminum Cap making the North 1/4 earner; Thence leaving said northerly line and following the easterly line of said Northwest 1/4,S00'43'55"W a distance of 586.55 feet to a 1/2-Inch rebar, Thence leaving said easterly line,5S9'?5'31"E a distance of 17.44 feet to a point; Thence SOT34'294W a distance-oF397,44 Feet to a point; Thence N89`25'31"W a dicta nce of 826_54 feet to a po int; Thence Np0°32'13"E a distance of 837.62 feet to a 112-inch reWr, Thence 569'18'13"W a distance Of 270-56 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; Thence N31`55'3YW a distance of 81.73 feet to a pains;; Thence53-14 feet along the arc of a cirrular curve tDthe right,said Curve havl rig a radlusof 115.DO feed, a delta angle of 26'28'39",a chord bearing of N18'41'13"W and a chord dlstanee of 52.67 feet to a 5/9- inch rebar; Thence N00'3243"E a distance of 125.29 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. So Id parce l contains a tota l of 19.952 acres,more or less- Attached hereto is Exhibit Band by this reference is hereby made a part of. Cxk a' 1 46 s3 92"Vftpt5tote5k W r Balse,Idaha M1714 . 208.ON9.6939 * kmcnellp-cam Page 33 Page 175 Item#7. D d EV t � 3 ❑ POINT OF BD'IHHING W.Chin hd den B (Hwy 20126) ALUMINUM CAP WN 1/4 CORNER BASIS OF BEARING �S1;CT10N 28 20 21 _ _ S99'27'17"E 20o9.4o' Q 29 28 48@"27'WE 1464.66' 3424.74' � G4 NOG 32'43 LA"f 0 7 ❑ 125.2E1' a,, v N31'55'351V Q 06 01.73' u°Vi Z3 4 CC a Rezone Area: 19.$5±AC. -I-, n, 50428211202,R6991222101,R6991222210(Portron), 0 ,n 50428220950{Pdrtiany,S0428120640{portion} o a IT— &5042813120a(Porti x L z � Current Zoning:RUT W v N Proposed Zoning:C•G 4 d � o � a M S8725'31'E 41 17.44' I DATE: DECE>a(�ER T010 Z f+ CURVE TABLE PNOIFCT; 18300 CURVE 1 RAIDIUS LENGTH DELTA CH RID RRG CHORE) SHEET: 1 OF 1 Cl 115.00' 53A4' 21m-39- NIB-41.13-W 52.87' 'v i � H89'25'31"1V 828.54' F�yy EEYY y� ENfiBYEEA3.SIlINEY0R5.PGNINEAS 0 100 200 4Q0 1 9233WE5T5TATE5T0EET 0mc OAH0 83714 PHONE 1M)E396939 SCALE: 1'=200° FAX W81B39593Q Page 34 Page 176 Item#7. km E N G I N E E R I N G April 7,2020 Project No.18-140 Exhibit A Legal Description for Rezone to R-8 Prescott Ridge Subdivision A parcel of land situated in a portion of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 and a portion of the West 1/2 of Section 28,Township 4 North, Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows. Commencing at an aluminum cap narking the Northwest corner said Section 28, which (sears N89'27'17"W a distance of 2,609.40 feet from an aluminum cap marking the North 1/4 corner of said Section 28, thence following the northerly line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 28, S89'27'17"E a distance of 2,609.40 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence following the northerly line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 28,S89°2525"E a distance of 60.00 feet to a point; Thence leaving said northerly line,S00'43'55"W a distance of 658.89 feet to a point; Thence S89'24'23"E a distance of 1,248.58 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar on the easterly line of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 29; Thence fallowing said easterly line,S00'36'13"W a distance of 1,615.76 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence leaving said easterly line, N77`58'17"W a distance of 1,338.12 feet to a 5/8-inch rehar an the easterly line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 28; Thence following said easterly line, SO743'55"W a distance of 625.95 feet to 2-inch pipe marking the Center 1/4 of said Section 28; Thence leaving said easterly line,S00'43'51"W a distance of 24.35 feet to a 5/8-inch rehar; Thence S53"05'53"W a distance of 16.53 feet to a 5/8-inch rehar; Thence N78"07'38"W a distance of 19.68 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence S89"18'46"W a distance of 45.49 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence N86'14'49"W a distance of 63.62 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence N88'50'04"W a distance of 85.57 feet to a 5/8-inch rehar; Thence N80'59'54"W a distance of 36.69 feet to a 5/8-inch rehar; Thence N70'27'41"W a distance of 25.64 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence S89'15'00"W a distance of 20.04 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence N86'53'39"W a distance of 189.53 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence S64'04'03"W a distance of 27.64 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar; Thence N89'14'25"W a distance of 799.53 feet to a point; Thence N00°52'21"E a distance of 16.96 feet to a point being the Center West 1/16 corner of said Section 28; Thence following the southerly line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 28, N89'21'12"W a distance of 686.03 feet to a point; Thence leaving said southerly line,ND1'00'37"E a distance of 400.00 feet to a point; Thence N89'21'12"W a distance of 625.00 feet to a point on the westerly line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 28; Thence following said westerly line,ND1"00'37"E a distance of 690.74 feet to a point; 9233 West State Street • Boise,Idaho 83714 • 20-8.639,6939 • kmenglip.com Page 35 Page 177 Item#7. Thence leaving said westerly line,S71"33'16"E a distance of 483.50 feet to a point; Thence S78'08'16"E a distance of 589.77 feet to a point; Thence 545"56'01"E a distance of 299.29 feet to a point; Thence N75'51'12"E a distance of 48.41 feet to a paint; Thence NOO°52'17"E a distance of 21598 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; Thence N75°32'13"E a distance of 272AO feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; Thence 30.59 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 45.00 feet, a delta angle of 38"56'33",a chord bearing of N75'32'13"E and a chord distance of 30.00 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; Thence N75'32'13"E a distance of 219.13 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar.- Thence NOO'32'13"E a distance of 659.67 feet to a point; Thence 589`25'31"E a distance of 279.95 feet to a point; Thence SOW34'29"W a distance of 420.05 feet to a point; Thence 589'25'31"E a distance of 27160 feet to a point; Thence.82.73 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 150.00 feet, a delta angle of 31°3b'09",a chord bearing of S73"37'27"E and a chard distance of 81.69 feet to a point; Thence S57'49'22"E a distance of 138.82 feet to a point; Thence 275.78 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 500.00 feet, a delta angle of 31`36'09",a chord bearing of N16'22'33"E and a chord distance of 272.30 feet to a point; Thence NOD"34'29"E a distance of 233.13 feet to a point; Thence 589'25*31"E a distance of496.43 feet to a point; Thence ND4°36'19"E a distance of 294.85 feet to a point; Thence 1\189°24'23"W a distance of 496.59 feet to a point; Thence NOO°34'29"E a distance of 122.33 feet to a point; Thence N89°25'31"W a distance of 17.44 feet to a point on the easterly Me of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 28; Thence following said easterly line, NOO'43'55"E a distance of 586.55 Beet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 99.532 acres, more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is hereby made a part of. - 1 ` I S T �- m 124 C OF % B Ilk Client Project Name PAGE 2 Page 36 Page 178 Item#7. POINT OF BEGINNING O ALUMINUM CAP 0 — N i/4 CORNER i SECTION 28 20 21 8A515 OF BEARING W,Chinden Blvd{Hwy 20/26) CL — —SB9'27'17"E 2609.40' L1 m p POINT OF COMMENCEMENT — — C' m Q ALUMINUM CAP 00 Q S00'43'55"W 1 SE14W CORNER 658.89' V1 N SECTION 28 u� ED �O °�' s L24 S89'24'23"E 124B.58' N V O Ln z z 1 L23 L22 S89'25'31"E ,h ro4 279.95' I 1 � p C S89'25'31"E a — .� 496.43' *—' a-' u 0 250 500 1000 0; m 2 -x VI O el w O m 61 N M SCALE: 1"=500' �, $ LIB w a O N 7y O N Z S77.33 B" Z C2 o a} 4a ' e Rezone Area:99.53±AC. "' t v so s7608'1s 01 50428233640,R6991222210(Portion),50428120950(Portion), Enc° V 589.77' Ctrs C1 SO428131315&SO428131200(Portion) a o A �2 Current Zoning:RUT `O S4611,56'01"E Proposed Zoning:R-8 DATE: APRIL 2020 299.29' �}k PROJECT. 18-140 N89'21'12"W N77-5817.W 133 SHEET: 625.00' w In tn 8.12' 1 OF Z b M O In In N a o p CENTER-WEST 1/16 CORNER o o OF SECTION 28 2" PIPE o g — CENTER OF SECTION 28 ` z N89'21'12"W 686.03' BRASS CAP L13 N89'14'25"W 789.53' _ — Ion W 1/4 CORNER ' SECTION 2S Jf�Tr L10 �q LS ENGINEERS.SURVEYORS.PLANNERS 9233 WEST STATE STREET 8015E,IDANC 83714 \_L12L71 L7 Lfi 1-2 PHCNE(209)639-6939 L3 FAx{206)639-6930 Page 37 Page 179 Item#7. o CL LINE TABLE LINE TABLE 0 f0 u LINE BEARING DISTANCE UNE BEARING DISTANCE C o L1 589'25'25"E 60.00 L15 NO'52'17"E 215.98 CO Q� � L2 S0'43'51"W 24.35 Lib N7532'13'E 272.40 m L3 S53'05'53W 16.53 L17 N75'32'13% 219.13 �0 f0 r L4 N7B'07'38"W 19.68 LIB 589'25'31"E 275.80 iz -Q cr L5 S89'18'4B W 45.49 L19 S57'49'22'E 138.82 O L/1 Z Z L6 N86'14'49"W 83.62 L20 NO'34'29"E 233.13 0J (D N UD o0 L7 NBW50'04'W 55.57 L21 NO'35'19'E 294.95 o ry LB N80'S9'54"W 38.69 L22 NB9'24'23'W 496.59 m O } +� u L9 N70'27'41"W 25.64 L23 NO'34'29'E 122.33 0 N L10 S89.15'00'W 20.04 L24 N59'25'31'W 17.44 L Ln o X L11 N86'53'39'W 189.53 L25 NO'43'55"E 556.55 LLI a N L Y \ L12 56404'03"W 27.64 � N C L13 140'S2'21"E 16.96 O L14 NIU51-12-E 48.41 r m O C a + Q o CURVE TABLE DA1E: APRIL2M CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA CHORDBRG CHORD ➢ROIECIC: �euD Cl 45.00' 30.59' 3856'33' N75'3243'E 30.00 SHEET: C2 150.00' 62.73' 31'36'09' S73'3727'E 81.59 Z OF 2 C3 500.00' 275.78' 31'36'09" Ni6'22'33'E 272.30' I= ENGINEERS.SURVEVORS.PIANNM 9233 WESTSTATESTREET MISE,IDAH083114 FAX(2DR rv2WN 6 9 P I 39-69309 Page 38 Page 180 Item#7. km E N G I N E E R I N G April 7,2020 Project No.18-140 Exhibit A Legal Description for Rezone to R-15 Prescott Ridge Subdivision A parcel of land situated in a portion cf Northwest 1/4 and a portion of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 28,Township 4 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an aluminum cap marking the Northwest corner said Section 28, which bears N89"27'17"W a distance of 2,609.40 feet from an aluminum cap marking the North 114 corner of said Section 28, thence following the northerly line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 28, S89°27'17"E a distance of 2,078.14 feet to a point; Thence leaving said northerly line,500°43'55"W a distance of 983.71 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence S89"25'31"E a distance of 546.59 feet to a point; Thence N00'34'29"E a distance of 275.11 feet to a point; Thence S89'24'23"E a distance of 496.59 feet to a point; Thence 500436'19"W a distance of 294.85 feet to a point; Thence N89°25'31"W a distance of 496.43 feet to a point; Thence 500`34'29"W a distance of 233.13 feet to a point; Thence.275.78 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 500.00 feet, a delta angle of 31'36'09",a chord bearing of 516°22'33"W and a chord distance of 272.30 feet to a point; Thence N57°49'22"W a distance of 138.82 feet to a point; Thence 82.73 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 150_OD feet,a delta angle of 319V)9",a chord bearing of N73°37'27"W and a chord distance of 81.69 feet to a point; Thence N89'25'31"W a distance of 275.60 feet to a point; Thence N00'34'29"E a distance of 420.05 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, Said parcel contains a total of 8.822 acres,more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit 3 and by this reference is hereby made a part of. 4 � 12459 g OF Z. 9233 West State street Boise,Idaho 83714 * 208.639.6939 kmengllp.com Page 39 Page 181 Item#7. m a ALUMINUM CAP T r N 1/4 CORNER m + BASIS OF BEARING W.Chinden Blvd(Hwy 20/26) 1 SECTION 25 =3 20 21 _ S69-27'17"E 2609.40' / O 0 29 26 2078.14' — — — — — C a -a ,j _d o ¢ � a � POINT OF COMMENCEMENT ALUMINUM CAP �O : c NW CORNER I — — SECTION 2B w 0) O m i S89'24'23'E 496.59' — — — r4 '^ d GC `pcc O M e rn m y Z V 4� o Ln n I M > o I,//r POINT OF BEGINNING N r' � z X N S89'25'31"E 546.59' v Y L Rezone Area: 8.82±AC. i N89'25'31 W 496.43' p O c Z o R6991222210(Portion)& �, M Y o 0 50428120950(Portion) M Current Zoning:RUT a ¢ w Proposed Zoning:R-15 � I I DATE: APRIL 2020 N PROJECTS 18-140 M d I SHEET: Z I 1OF1 U N69'25'31'1N 275.60' C2 CURVETABLF N57'49'22"W 0 100 200 400 lam CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA CHORD BRG CHORD 138'82 C1 5ao.00' 275.78' 31'36'09" S1622'33W 272,30' I SCALE: 1"=200' ENGINEERS.SURVEYORS.PLANNERS sTATr STREET C2 150.00' 82.73' 31'36'09' N7337'27W 81.69' 9z33wes'DAHO83714 BOiSE,IOAH083714 PHONE(208)53M939 FAX(203)53M930 Page 40 Page 182 Item#7. C. Preliminary Plat(date: 912812020 10,121 20 i i 20,/ 12/22/20),Phasing Plan u.Lot r .,, ou4 Exhibit- REVISED _ Y1GRm FNP:iLL PRESCOTT PRELIMINARY PLAT SHOWING Z — —~—� I w.allorN o<va A PARCEL OF LAND 5I7UA7EP INAPpRT19N OF THE NpRTHEAST 114 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 O F S ECTI O N 28,TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 WESi,MSL MLRI DIAN,ADA COUNTY.IDAHO f 1 K """•„' � 'ram ._�__ I OPEN SPATE LOTAREM ttnr am T".w :aCi 63 wh 08 _ _- i:':g:a.. -....,...... a .❑ tie: m a�� � �..�- .. ,. ,.m.,��, ;5;;®® B a 1 m @ m�o ® } ® ai ® 3I::EI3!r;,�;E:F?' m � B v B a `` ...�� � •., ::"AI 7.N SPA:: 6 2:: _"6:� 1L ® @ ® •• I PRESCCFTE RIOGESUBDIVIMON MERIDIAN,IDARO all @ 9 $F7 9 ®S;•.. a B E:1 0 i ® @ @ ®@ O C7 Oi Tj '`S ,km _r�in.r�zw,n �• PPLO LL Page 41 Page 183 Item#7. r .r4 o. (r �J•irY�,y .'& ^O O� sly b �': ® � �'�� f �� � � ..,© .r 1 �2 LAVdUT PLAN l', .:.�L I�a' •���n .4--I.'�� AHE5CUUMDUE 5U9oN15 IbAHD I ` 1 bt•TMfuN MATCH LINE 2.1 SHEET PP2.2 ® 1 \ - Ymil.-:�. V yII k T 1 ® ® BESCD7 FIDGE SUBDIV151py p A ® d ® _ O ➢ Q E7 a O �' m _ D MERIDIAN,ICAHO LAYOUT PLAN r --1 ...PP2.3 .. Page 42 Page 184 Item#7. _---.... — 0 . . •, ,, ., p , . ... 5-�--MATC�LfN��S�E3NEET PP2.3. ® .. 1 .� ` ��� �� -•. r S® ------------------ ® k, . . :•: : '� o e n.•.••.• MATCH LINE•SEE SHEETPP2.1— �,:��;�;;;_;;;�;_;_; , � �.+ T LAY�VT PLRN rti.•.•..-..-. � ' - - - - 1 APcH ♦ n -q ... m FF'PiiF�''�'`� e`�`s•.f}�$ �^-x« -✓� p .■I �4 � o - d;'v4'G". AA2~�.. N�9.i//L. ��le- A"'•�'�°i�..�.ti/ �r arm w.'r" '•� BESWT F RIDGE SIIDDIVISI^ �rnnu . ='I_ w PP2.2-^ 1 1 ml f� zl 1 x al f� �1 It �1 Ig NI IN L44 � i RI -------------- MATCH LINE-SEE SHEET PP2.4 _ ---, — ----1 RESCOTT MIDGE SUBDIVISION� f MEND IMI,ID4HO f ® jp ' 5 m - E. i t ii MATCH LINE•SEE SHEET PPL2 4c PP3.3 g Page 43 Page 185 Item#7. -----f--.--------.-f��- 1 , Ir r r r r i ' I ' I a' F ' I I ' I r � r ' I [t 1 i - Page 44 Page 186 PHASE BUILDABLE E, LC TS 77-f 65 T2 44 3 41 4 43 z 5 41 Q 6 1 37 2:2 PHASE 1 7 39 a 46 z 9 14 f z :E TOTAL UUILL)AULE 370 x LOTS 'PHA. E. PHASE......... u i pIASF LLJ7 km IN 0 1 N I I I I G EL ITIASE 3 �77771777114LLLLQ� Plan Scale-1' 300' Page 45 Item#7. D. Landscape Plan(date: 4�7tivrrvrwzv i 0/9/2 20 11 n n/2n 12/22/20)—REVISED 1• C � unm •.w 1 N •w' �iT�'' � - . w M•yA I� u - •*P: —n •_�L { MGA •r 'W'OIL I PEN 5Pp{C i EES —J R$Md � h � ,. ISY�E7, t11E[[wILUL4fi[xi5 f1TREV311f�• `x � '� xa, • :� �� tt1i AL SIRE FT TR[FS 1 ....�5 � .i -il,Y"y�'A�^� I "1r� - �• '�' � iL �•u rpm w JCO -- 1 • .':I s f ImrrrATIPN KAYIILEMWTS " To � mrumnne pvneo � L Ih+A MSAIOMN,IDAHO I . - r u�owlnccna lie+ s -- I i� .,- mrr•cR�xro�uio• awl• Wp•e+li WlX•IYn_ - LANdS[APE SITE PLAN —�� vvL1A Page 46 Page 188 Item#7. twl'+ri -- - ---•�.... i � �ii17Yriz4rs • i ' I �■ I 1 1 { I 7 � Ir L � • � 'Fr w,�-e � � ._=pia=_____ !-• I �. ��aRR-T� � TF•IwE ! i �—� { +_�~ •� f� -�Sti ` � - a ��a• sat •rf le � 1'*14MI4-* IIFS 1 Ak T • • F��Y wllt■ e•{l ti1Y1lia ��' �•• ", —_ Cl m � i y 1+ li' i • I; ,1 t 4_ i -- ■ I+ulr Page 47 Page 189 Item#7. _ n+ -----_-+. --- ------------------ _ ' i Ir �� ia4� 1 � • ��1 ,,r :I : i sa� 1 ylh � • 4J F` * it • `�} f + I � ` + �1 'ram �. + � • - - --• - I i ti�ti r� rr • • f --_.aui-i i-.Fa �• ' r' ' a 1 �' • .-a—a a�a-ai�-o • ` F + r � as a •1r��.. u: • terra arr�--_ I 1 LR�tiW L---------- -------------------------- J. �a 1 � 1' a� Page 48 Page 190 Item#7. Ftl...tl 1 W.sarr• ----��__ f — _ 1 1 1 • � 9 Page 49 Page 191 Item#7. E. Qualified Open Space Exhibit& Site Amenities(dated: °"6"^ '0/9/2#"' 12/22/20)—REVISED PRESCOTT RIDGE SUBDIVISION F E MNANYP TOPENSPACEOATA °�"�'�`°" OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT a a a J • "°" a R ®B • Ilr o a a B i ® aBB® !� ®1 • B TO MA ENWACE ® uva� •• B®� � ® • • � •B® 4 ®® � i_fro-�..-wu w+�m vu awx a Ba®® ••a e n a Y I.�. ® a• ® e a s B e I a e I ® ®m m a � ®w••®e•w a n w B e B® ® mp a� a -- _ i —I I—��`� i B ® °®oar "a ®uaw w ® e ® e• a ® B • RESCOTT RIDGE SUBDIVISION • •••B B •••B a ® ® m A'®®�d • MERIDIAN,IDAHD ut OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT Page 50 Page 192 Item#7. AMEWHES v � ' A-POOL ANO CLU HOUSE TI- Yll=*+rU 136USf BU I LOING ..----- - ,� 54'83LPPOOL _ 17 PARKING SPACES r Ll B-L-ARGETOT lOT 4 - C-SMALL'TOT LOT D DOGPARYJPOCKET PART( PRESCOT'I- E-OPEN SPACE F•MEW RIDGE G-PROPERTY MANAGEMENT MERIDIAN,IDAHO -. E OFFICE.ENCLOSED BIKE STORAGE,CENTRAL ,�Iy F MAI=X CW5TER,AND „ti B I �I� -- ILL DIRECTORY MAP .....//1 A SCHEMATIC CLUBHOUSE — -j I' g LARGETOTLOT t T' SMALL TOT LOT pOG PARKIPOCKET PARK Page 51 Page 193 Item#7. F. Parking Plan(dated:4/8/20 10/21/2020)—REVISED -- • ��. _ a� ----��- litilli I S 1 I P4XIWG IN FROM}W I IVHL.:IS I I �- a 6 4 g� 4 �., L 111 •.•.•.•.•.:•:.... _ W J �- 7 1ttt 3 8 RR- 7 - -- ny I a OM HOMES PAFmING I ¢ 9 ,3 9 - � 3 � ��•�� lti�� - _ 6 E 5 km 3 5 6 5 3 3 3 e a -— F M13ut�tElN 3 16 I 10 � e PARKING t MIT szacieoFunvuWnc Page 52 Page 194 Item#7. G. Conceptual Building Elevations/Perspectives-REVISED SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ` I RIDGE MEY CIA•NRHU { TOWNHOMES FOUR-PLEX FLATS Nor- jp Film AWO i S Page 53 Page 195 Item#7. 1 + Three-story Hospital Watercolor Rendering _ Mimi MERIDIAN HOSPITAL TEST FIT H ;•� MERIDIAH,IDAHO W.M2' Healthcare" Page 54 Page 196 Item#7. H. Parcel Status Exhibit 10*1 IandproDATA Parcel Status Exhibit R6991222101 -Wheaton Legal parcel as a platted lot SO428211102- Roark within Peregrine Heights Legal parcel per e-mail Subdivision and e-mail from from Brent Danielson Brent Danielson dated e dated 8.26.19. 8.26.19• wy 20 W Chinden Blvd r SO428120640- Providence Illegal parcel,but will become ACHD z right-of-way per Christy Little e-mail dated 11.6.19. R6991222210- Roark Legal parcel as a platted SO428131200-School lot within Peregrine Illegal parcel,but included Heights Subdivision. with this application to S0428233640- Hon rectify illegal status. Legal parcel per e-mail from Brent Danielson dated 9.5.19. ❑ 0 SO428120950&SO428131315- Kuenzli House parcel is legal. �i Remainder is illegal,but will be rectified SO428233620-Thomson qh by this application. Legal parcel per e-mail from Brent Danielson q3°39'13.74"dated 9.5.19. N 115°27'15.48"W — Map cats 02019 Aug 25,2019-IandproDATA.com The materials available at this website are for informational Scale:1 inch approx 600 feet purposes only and do not constitute a legal document. Page 55 Page 197 Item#7. IX. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION commercial,The conceptual development plan for the C G zoned portion of the site, shall be- Fevised and submitted to the City Cler-k at least 4 0 days p4or to the City Couneil hearing FeReet eonfor-manee with the following guidelines in the COMPFehensive Plan for-Mixed Use • The buildings in the commercial C G zoned portion of the deVelopment shall be arran ed to er-eate some form of >usable RFea, parks,the mixed use guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan (pg.3 43)-. not limited to plazas, outdoof gathering areas, open space, > site; —and—seho-olls shall be provided in the Mixed Use designated portion of the outdoor seating areas-at annex-ation area does not satisfy this mquiventent as it is notpar4 of the AKmed U-se designate • Development of the Mixed Use designated area shall be eentered around spaees that are well designed publie and quasi pubfie eenteFs of aetivity. Spaees should be netivated and ineor-porate permanent design elements and amenities that fosteF a wide variety o interests ranging&om leisure to play. These areas should be thoughtfully integrated in • The 4 story medieal office building proposed at the southeast eorner of the eommere development shall be shifted to the HOFth tO fFont on the main entry dFive aisle off N. Rustie Oak Way as a be�fte-r t-f-a-u-sition to the residenees to the south. • A eofflMeFeial land use type shall be ineluded on the plan in the MU R designated a retail, restaurants, 1. A Development Agreement(DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. At the Applicant's request,three(3) separate DA's shall be required for each component of the project—one for the R-8 and R-15 zoned residential portions of the development, one for the medical campus and another for the school district's parcel. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, Development Agreements shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s)at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer(s). Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicants to the Planning Division for each DA prior to commencement of the DA's. The DA's shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA's shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. R-8 and R-15 zoned portions of the development: 1. Future development of the R-8 and R-15 zoned portions of the site shall be generally consistent with the master plan,preliminary plat,phasing plan, landscape plan, qualified open space & site amenity exhibit, and conceptual building elevations included in Section VI11 and the provisions contained herein. Page 56 Page 198 Item#7. 2. Administrative design review shall be required for all single-family attached, townhome and multi-family structures. Compliance with the design standards for such listed in the Architectural Standards Manual is required. 3. The rear and/or side of structures on Lots 2-6,Block 4; Lots 2-7,Block 1; Lots 8 and 9- 15,Block 9; Lot 16,Block 7; Lot 2,Block 12; Lots 2-14,Block 10;Lots 2-16 and 29, Block 14; Lot 68, 70, 81-83, and 77-78,Block 12; and Lots 43 4 4, 75 42,45 and-79 67, Block 8 that face collector streets(i.e.N.McDermott Rd.,N. Rustic Oak Way and W. Ramblin St.), shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding, porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. 4. A conditional use permit shall be obtained for a multi-family development in the R-15 zoning district as set forth in UDC Table 11-2A-2. The use is subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27: Multi-Family Development. 5. One management company shall handle the leasing and maintenance of the entire multi- family development to ensure better overall consistent management of the development. 6. An electronic gate that is approved by the Fire Department shall be provided for access to Serenity Ln. from the south. 7. Noise abatement for the future SH-16 extension shall be provided in the form of a berm or a berm and wall combination parallel to N. McDermott Rd. constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3H-4D. b. Medical campus/hospital: 1. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the master plan,preliminary plat,phasing plan, landscape plan and conceptual building elevation included in Section VIII and the provisions contained herein. 2. Future development shall comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and in the Architectural Standards Manual. 3. Noise abatement shall be provided in the form of a berm or a berm and wall combination parallel to W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3H-413. 4. A minimum 30-foot wide buffer with an 8-foot tall CMU wall shall be provided along the western and southern boundaries of the site adjacent to residential uses as proposed on the landscape plan in Section VIII.D. Dense landscaping consisting of a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs, lawn or other vegetative ground cover that results in a barrier that allows trees to touch at maturity is required per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-9C. The block wall shall be decorative and have texture and a color complimentary to adjacent residential structures—plain CMU block is not allowed. 5. A frontage road parallel to W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 shall be constructed as depicted on the conceptual development plan in Section VIII.A in accord with UDC 11-3H- 4B.3e. 6. The hospital building shall be restricted to 3-stories in height as proposed. Page 57 Page 199 Item#7. 7. The entire first floor of the medical office building shall consist of retail and restaurant uses as proposed to provide a mix of uses as desired in the Mixed-Use designated area in accord with the Comprehensive Plan. 8. The final design of the site shall be consistent with the general Mixed Use and Mixed Use—Regional guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan(see pgs. 3-13 thru 3-15 and 3-18 thru 3-19). 9. The buffer along the west boundary of the site shall incorporate a 2-foot tall berm with an 8-foot tall wall on top of the berm to assist in blocking the noise from the commercial development if approved by the Peregrine Heights Homeowner's Association(HOA). If not approved by the HOA,the landscaping and wall shall be installed as depicted on the conceptual development plan. 10. City Council deemed access for the emergency room via Rustic Oak,a collector street. meets the intent of the requirement in UDC 11-4-3-22A for Hospitals providing emergency care to have direct access on an arterial street. 11. The hospital shall not pursue beingdesignated as a trauma center per direction of City Council. c. School Site: 1. The subject property shall develop with an education institution; any other uses shall require modification of this agreement. 2. A conditional use permit shall be obtained for an education institution in the R-8 zoning district as set forth in UDC Table 11-2A-2. The use is subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-14: Education Institution. 3. Future development shall comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and in the Architectural Standards Manual is required. 2. The final plat(s) submitted for this development shall incorporate the following changes: a. Include a note that prohibits direct lot access via W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 unless otherwise approved by the City and the Idaho Transportation Department. . c. Depict cross-access/ingress-egress easements to adjacent MU-R designated properties to the west(Parcels#R6991221700 &R6991221600)and east(Parcel#R6991222101)in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A.2. Page 58 Page 200 Item#7. e. Depict the easement(s)for the West Tap sub-lateral; if the easement(s)is greater than 10- feet in width, it should be placed in a common lot that is a minimum of 20-feet in width and outside of a fenced area,unless modified by City Council as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6E. fl. Re design the townhaffie pei4ien of the development(i.e. Lots 16 79, Bleek 8)with P41 multi family dei,elopment(i.e. one stmetufe on one pr-epet4y with 3 of:more dwellifig tiflits) with townheme style tmits might be a development option for-this afea. A Fevised eoneept plan shall be presented P40F tO or-at the Commission hearing for review and a revised plat refleeting this ehange shall be submitted at least 10 days prior to the City Cou hearing.if private stFeets are PFOPosed with a townhome development, a mew or-g ffiVate StFeets should beffevided in aeeord with UDC 1= 3F 1.Also,provide updated density ealeuladoftsv g. Lots 70-83,Block 12 in the multi-family portion of the development shall be revised to depict parking and access driveways on a common lot with an ingress-egress/parking easement for each buildable lot. A Fe-Ased plat shall be submitted at least 10 days p .Done h. Extend W. Smokejumper St. as a stub street to the out-parcel(Parcel#S0428233620) at the southwest corner of the site. 3. The landscape plan submitted with the final plat application shall be revised as follows: a. Depict a detail/cross-section of the berm or berm and wall combination required as noise abatement within the street buffer along W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 and N. McDermott Rd.; also address how the wall will be constructed to avoid a monotonous wall,that demonstrates compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3H-4D. b. Remove Lot 1,Bleek 15 as it's AC14D right of way and eaflaot be platted as a e0faffien . c. Depict a detached sidewalk/pathway(as applicable) along all collector streets(i.e.N. McDermott Rd.,N. Rustic Oak Way and W. Ramblin St.) and W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 in accord with UDC 11-3A-17.A detached 10 foot wide multi-use pathway is required within the street buffers along N. McDermott Rd., W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26, the east side off. Rustic Oak Way and W. Ramblin St. d. Landscaping shall be depicted on either side of all pathways as set forth in UDC 11-3B- 12C. e. If existing trees are proposed to be removed from the site,the Applicant shall coordinate with Matt Perkins,the City Arborist,to determine mitigation requirements per the standards listed in UDC 11-313-1OC.5. Mitigation information shall be included on the plan. If existing trees are proposed to be retained on site,they shall be depicted on the plan. f. A calculations table shall be included on the plan that demonstrates compliance with the landscape standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3E(common open space), 11-313-12C (pathways), 11-3A-17(parkways) and 11-3B-7C(street buffers); calculations should include the linear feet of pathways,parkways and street buffers and square footage of common open space as applicable, along with the required vs.provided number of trees. g. Revise the fencing type around the perimeter of Lot 1,Block 2 and Lot 37,Block 12 to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7A.7 to provide more visibility of the common areas in accord with CPTED design strategies. h. Include a detail of the amenities proposed with each phase of development. Page 59 Page 201 Item#7. i. The CMU wall proposed along the south and west boundaries of the commercial portion of the development shall have texture and a color complimentary to adjacent residential structures—plain CMU block is not allowed; revise the detail(i.e.reference photo) accordingly. development in Bleek 9 in aeeer-d with the st�a�-Fds listed i UDG 11 30 3E. k. If a dog park is proposed on Lot 1, Block 2, demonstrate compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3C.Ih. 1. Depict a small tot lot on Lot 12,Block 6 rather than a large tot lot, consistent with that shown on the site amenities plan. m. Modify the landscape plan consistent with changes required to the plat above under condition IX.A.2 above. 4. Future development shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-6, 11-2A-7 and 11-213-3 for the R-8,R-15 and C-G zoning districts respectively. 5. Off-street parking is required to be provided for residential uses in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 and for commercial uses in accord with the standards listed in 1I- 3C-6B;bicycle parking is required in commercial districts as set forth in UDC 11-3C-6G per the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-5C. ehanges noted above in eondition#A.2f and that ffovides fOF adequate guest parking serve this POF00H of the developmen-G. 6. An exhibit shall be submitted with the final plat application(s)that depicts the setbacks,fencing, building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via common driveways; if a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street,the driveway shall be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D. 7. Address signage shall be provided at the public street for homes accessed via common driveways for emergency wayfinding purposes. 8. Common driveways shall be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. A perpetual ingress/egress easement shall be filed with the Ada County Recorder for the common driveways,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. This information may be included in a note on the face of the plat rather than in a separate easement. plat in the townheme pei4ien of the developmefft in Bleek 8 are not approved. , 10. All existing structures shall be removed from the site prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer for the phase in which they are located. 11. Pathways shall be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8. 12. A 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division for the 10-foot wide multi-use pathways proposed within the site as required by the Park's Department, prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer for the phase in which they are located. Page 60 Page 202 Item#7. 13. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted and approved prior to submittal of any building permit applications for the clubhouse and swimming pool facility, single-family attached,townhome, multi-family and commercial structures.All structures except for single-family detached structures are required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1.1 This proposed development is not currently serviceable by the Meridian City water and sanitary sewer systems. Mainlines designed to service this development are within The Oaks North Subdivision to the south.Until utilities are available to the south boundary of the proposed development,the City of Meridian will not accept an application for final plat. 1.1.2 Sewer mainline/manholes are not allowed in common driveways or under sidewalks. Run service lines down common drive but make sure required separation can be met. 1.1.3 The planned sewer trunk line will enter this property at N. Rustic Oak Way. 1.1.4 The sewer line in N. Rustic Oak Way shall be 10-inch all the way to Chinden Blvd. 1.1.5 The applicant shall be required to pay the Oaks Lift Station and Pressure Sewer Reimbursement Fees in the amount of$265.25 per equivalent residential unit(ERU). The reimbursement fees for the entire residential portion of this subdivision shall be paid prior to city signatures on the first final plat. 1.1.6 The applicant shall be required to pay the Oaks Lift Station Pump Upgrades Reimbursement Fees in the amount of$185.43 per equivalent residential unit(ERU). The reimbursement fees for the entire residential portion of this subdivision shall be paid prior to city signatures on the first final plat. 1.1.7 As noted in the Geotechnical Evaluation Report prepared by GeoTek Inc., all artificial fill materials on site must be removed. 1.1.8 New 12-inch water main will need to be installed in parts of W Sturgill Peak St,N Jumpspot Ave,W Parachute Dr,N Streamer Way,W Smokejumper St and N Rustic Oak Way. 1.1.9 Construct water main in N Streamer Way between W.Parachute Drive and W. Fireline Drive. 1.1.10 Water connections to the north need to be facilitated either by extension of a mainline or and easement in common area Lot 19,Block 1, or off the end of the cul-de-sac to the property line. This is dependent on how road connections to the north are designed and developed in the future. 1.1.11 Remove the water main proposed in N Serenity Avenue. At the intersection of N Serenity Ave and W Tanker Dr,Install a tee at the branch off point with an isolation valve directly attached to it and then cap off the outlet side of the valve. This allows the tap to be installed and pressure tested so if the existing County Subdivision wants to connect in the future they can easily do so. 1.1.12 Water& sewer need to flip locations in N Backfire Way. Currently these lines are not in the proper corridor. Water should be located on the east side of the road&sewer on the west. Page 61 Page 203 Item#7. 1.1.13 Eliminate stub/dead-end water main at each corner of the townhome section off of W Wildfire Dr of the development. Services are only allowed in these areas just like common drives. 1.1.14 A water connection to the east(near N Static Line Ave and/or townhome section off of N Rustic Oak Way)needs to be enabled by either an extension of water mains to the property line or an easement. This is dependent on road connections to the east. 1.1.15 Water modeling was completed both as an entire development and at each phase per the phasing plan included in this record. This development was modeled with the 12"mains through the subdivision as required above, and the rest of the mains were modeled as 8". Per this plan there are no pressure issues,but each phase will need to be modeled at Final Plat to verify there aren't any pressure issues. 1.1.16 The geotechnical investigative report prepared by SITE Consulting,LLC indicates some very specific construction considerations. The applicant shall be responsible for the strict adherence of these recommendations to help ensure that groundwater does not become a problem within crawlspaces of homes. 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2"x I I"map with bearings and distances(marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year- round source of water(MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. Page 62 Page 204 Item#7. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals,or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B.Whitney at(208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer,an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. Page 63 Page 205 Item#7. 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridianciN.orgz WebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=188367&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiU D. POLICE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=188188&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianCity E. PARK'S DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridianciLy.org/WebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=191860&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity F. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO(COMPASS) https://weblink.meridiancioy.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=189738&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCioX G. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.asp x?id=192646&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity H. SETTLER'S IRRIGATION DISTRICT(SID) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.asp x?id=188429&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity I. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridianciV.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=188183&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiy J. WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT(WASD) Page 64 Page 206 Item#7. https://weblink.meridianciV.oEgj ebLink/DocView.aspx?id=188717&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiV K. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) https://weblink.meridiancity.ory/WebLink/DocView.asp x?id=188 71 7&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity Page 65 Page 207 Item#7. X. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-513-3E): Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment to R-8, R-15 and C-G zoning districts and proposed development is generally consistent with the MDR and MU-R FL UM designations in the Comprehensive Plan for this property if the Applicant complies with the provisions in Section IX. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the mix of lot sizes and housing types proposed in the residential portion of the development will provide for a range of housing opportunities consistent with the purpose statement of the residential districts and with the Comprehensive Plan. The City Council finds the proposed medical offices and hospital along with recommended retail/restaurant uses will provide much needed services in the northern portion of the City in accord with the purpose statement of the commercial districts and with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The Commission finds the proposed zoning map amendment will not result in an adverse impact on the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City. Comments submitted by WASD indicate that existing enrollment numbers are below capacity in area schools that will serve this development. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The City Council finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City if the property is developed in accord with the provisions in Section IX. B. Preliminary Plat Findings(UDC 11-613-6): In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; The City Council finds that the proposed plat, with recommendations, is in substantial compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density, transportation, and pedestrian connectivity. (Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies in, Section V of this report for more information) Page 66 Page 208 Item#7. 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds that public services will be provided to the subject property with development. (See Exhibit B of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers) 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the development at their own cost, the City Council finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development based upon comments from the public service providers (i.e., Police, Fire, ACHD, etc). (See Section Mfor more information) 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and, The City Council is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated with the platting of this property. ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The City Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that exist on this site that require preserving. C. Private Street Findings(UDC 11-3F-5): In order to approve the application,the director shall find the following: 1. The design of the private street meets the requirements of this article; The Director finds that the proposed design of the private street deer met meets the requirements in UDC 11-3F-4A.6 as whieh are prehibite as. ether than these that er-e a common mew is proposed through the site design er . a limited gated-residential development-, of whieh neither are 19ropes 2. Granting approval of the private street would not cause damage,hazard, or nuisance, or other detriment to persons,property, or uses in the vicinity; and The Director finds granting approval of the private street pang�Ls proposed fire lanes are bleeked due to paF*4ffg in unautherized areas should not cause damage, hazard, or nuisance, or other detriment to persons,property or uses in the vicinity. 3. The use and location of the private street shall not conflict with the comprehensive plan and/or the regional transportation plan. (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) The Director finds the use and location of the private street meets does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan or the regional transportation plan. Page 67 Page 209 Item#7. 4. The proposed residential development(if applicable) is a mew or gated development. (Ord. 10- 1463, 11-3-2010, eff. 11-8-2010) The Director finds the proposed residential development deer no incorporates_a mew or gate developme in the design. in ofder-to grant approval for-an altemative compliance applieation, the Director-shall deter-mine the following! z. StfiEt adherence aF applioation-of ther-e"ir-ements are Diet feasible; OF ; and 3. The altemative means will fiet be materially detFimeatal to the ptiblie welfare aF impair- the intended uses and ehar-actef of suffounding pfopet4ies, Page 68 Page 210 Item#7. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI N, AND DECISION& ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Annexation and Zoning of 128.21 Acres of Land with R-8(99.53 Acres),R-15(8.82 Acres) and C-G(19.85 Acres)Zoning; and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 371 Buildable Lots [102 Single-Family Attached,215 Single-Family Detached,38 Townhome, 14 Multi- Family,One(1) Commercial and One(1) School],42 Common Lots and Six(6) Other(Shared Driveway)Lots on 124.81 Acres of Land in the R-8,R-15 and C-G Zoning Districts for Prescott Ridge Subdivision,by Providence Properties,LLC. Case No(s).H-2020-0047 For the City Council Hearing Dates of. February 23,April 13, and May 18,2021 (Findings on June 1,2021) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 18,2021, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 18, 2021, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 18,2021, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 18,2021,incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67, Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § I I-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR PRESCOTT RIDGE—AZ,PP,PS H-2020-0047 - I - Page 139 Item#7. Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 18, 2021, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Annexation&Zoning and Preliminary Plat is hereby approved with the requirement of a Development Agreement per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of May 18,2021, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC I 1-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with I I-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I- 6B-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-651 IA. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR PRESCOTT RIDGE—AZ,PP,PS H-2020-0047 -2- Page 140 Item#7. property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52,Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of May 18,2021 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR PRESCOTT RIDGE—AZ,PP,PS H-2020-0047 -3- Page 141 Item#7. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 1st day of June 2021. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison 6-1-2021 Attest: Chris Johnson 6-1-2021 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 6-1-2021 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR PRESCOTT RIDGE—AZ,PP,PS H-2020-0047 -4- Page 142 Item#7. EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY N --- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I D A H O HEARING May 18,2021 Legend DATE: (Continued from:February 23 and Prot Lcofl-non Y April 13, 2021) -- - ----- TO: Mayor&City Council - FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: H-2020-0047 ' Prescott Ridge—AZ,PP,PST - LOCATION: South of W. Chinden Blvd. and east of N. ® _ McDermott Rd., in the North %2 of Section 28,Township 4N.,Range 1 W. - (Parcels: SO428233640, R6991222210, - f SO428120950, SO428131315, 4 SO428131200, SO428211102) NOTE: At the December I"hearing, the Council moved to remand the project back to the Commission for the out parcel at the northeast corner of the site adjacent to the commercial development to be included in the annexation area and development plan for the site. Since that time, the Applicant has acquired the out parcel and submitted updated plans that include the parcel in the development area. The staff report has been updated accordingly. The Commission heard this project on January 21s`and recommended approval of the updated plans and annexation boundary. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Annexation of a total of 426.53 128.21 acres of land with R-8 (99.53 acres),R-15 (8.82 acres)and C-G (48.47 19.85 acres)zoning districts; and, Preliminary Plat consisting of 395 377 371 buildable lots [346 32-3 single-family residential(94 102 attached-&-222 215/detached),63 38 townhome, 14 multi-family residential, 1 commercial and 1 school],22-39 42 common lots and 6 other(shared driveway) lots on 423.26 42345-3 124.81acres of land in the proposed R-8,R-15 and C-G zoning districts. Private streets are proposed within the townhome portion of the development for internal access and circulation. Altemative Gemplianee to UDG 11 3 F 4 A.4, when*,,...nh,mes are pFepesed, is also requested.Alternative Compliance is no longer required based on the revised plan which includes a mew. Page 1 Page 143 Item#7. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 122.8 124.07 Existing/Proposed Zoning Rural Urban Transition(RUT)in Ada County(existing)/R-8,R-15 and C-G(proposed) Future Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential(MDR)(3-8 units/acre)(113.5+/-acres) with Mixed Use—Regional(MU-R)(-9 10.27+/-acres)along W. Chinden Blvd. Existing Land Use(s) Rural residential/agricultural with 1 existing single-family home Proposed Land Use(s) Residential(single-family attached/detached,townhomes&multi- family)&commercial(medical campus with a hospital and medical offices and retail/restaurant uses) _ Lots(#and type;bldg./common) 395 377 371 buildable lots(316 323 317single-family residential,63 38 townhome, 14 multi-family, 1 commercial and 1 school)/32 39 42common lots/6 other(common driveway)lots Phasing Plan(#of phases) 9 phases wF Number of Residential Units(type 316 323 317 single-family(94 102 attached/ 215 detached),(63 38) of units) townhome and(56)multi-family units Density(gross&net) Overall-3-63 2.96 units/acre(gross);7.M 7.68 units/acre(net) R-8 area:4-87-3.07 units/acre(gross);749 7.07 units/acre(net) R-15 area: 12.97 7.57 units/acre(gross);21.39 13.8 units/acre(net) Open Space(acres,total 44.566 4r 12.43 acres(or 44.,8 15.41%) [%]/buffer/qualified) (49-54 8.04 acres required based on 105.08 80.42 acres of residential area) Amenities Swimming pool,clubhouse,large and small children's play structures, a dog park,multi-use pathways and additional qualified open space beyond the minimum standards Physical Features(waterways, Two(2)segments of the West Tap Sublateral cross this site hazards,flood plain,hillside) Neighborhood meeting date;#of 12/18/19- 11 attendees;and 4/l/20- 13 attendees; 12/16/20 7 attendees: attendees History(previous approvals) A portion of the site is Lot 18,Block 1,Peregrine Heights Subdivision (formerly deed restricted agricultural lot for open space—non-farm that has since expired). B. Community Metrics Description Details Pag e Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) N �Yes • Requires ACHD No Commission Action es/no Access A collector street access(W.Rustic Oak Way)is proposed via W. Chinden (Arterial/Collectors/State Blvd./SH 2O-26 at the half mile which runs through the site and connects to Hwy/Local)(Existing and a future collector street(N.Rustic Way)in the Oaks North development Proposed) from McMillan Rd.An access is proposed via N.McDermott Rd.,a collector street. Traffic Level of Service McDermott Rd.—Better than"D"(acceptable level of service) W.Rustic Oak Way/Levi Ln.—Better than"D"(acceptable level of service) Page 2 Page 144 Item#7. Description Details Pag e Stub Two local stub streets are planned to be constructed with the Oaks North Street/Interconnectivity/Gros development at the southern boundary of the site and extended with this s Access development. Two stub streets(N. Serenity Ave.&W.Fireline Ct.)are proposed to the north for future extension. A cross-access easement is required to be provided to the MU-R designated property to the west. Existing Road Network No public streets exist within the site;N. Levi Ln.,a private lane,exists on the northern portion of the site via W.Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26. Existing Arterial Sidewalks/ There are no existing buffers or sidewalks along N.McDermott Rd. or W. Buffers Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 Proposed Road Improvements Capital Improvements Plan(CIP)I Integrated Five Year Work Plan(IFYWP): • Black Cat Road is listed in the CIP to be widened to 3-lanes from Chinden Boulevard to McMillan Road between 2026 and 2030. • The intersection of Black Cat Road and Chinden Boulevard is listed in the CIP to be widened to 5-lanes on the north leg,5-lanes on the south leg,6-lanes on the east leg and 6-lanes on the south leg between 2026 and 2030. • The intersection of McMillan Road and Black Cat Road is listed in the CIP to reconstructed as a multi-lane roundabout with 2 lanes on the northbound and souhbound legs and 1 lane on the westbound and eastbound legs. • The intersection of McMillan Road and McDermott Road is listed in the CIP to be widened to 3-lanes on the north leg,4-laes on the south leg,3-lanes on the east leg and 3-lanes on the west leg between 2031 and 2035. Fire Service • Distance to Fire Station 3 miles from Station#5 to Serenity Ln.on Chinden&4.4 miles to the McDermott side of the project(Station#7 once constructed,will serve this development) • Fire Response Time Some of this development falls within the 5 minute response time area as shown on the priority growth map;the McDermott side is 8 minutes away and does not meet response time goals • Resource Reliability 80%from Station#5—meets response time goal • Risk Identification 2—current resources would not be adequate to supply service(open waterway) • Accessibility Project meets all required access,road widths and turnarounds as long as phasing plan is followed. • Special/resource needs Project will require an aerial device for the multi-family development— cannot meet this need in the required timeframe.Eagle Station#1 is the closest truck company at approximately 8.4 miles away. • Water Supply Requires 1,000 gallons per minute for one hour for the single-family homes; the multi-family areas will require additional water(may be less if buildings are fully sprinklered) • Other Resources NA Police Service No comments submitted • Distance to Police 9 miles Station • Police Response Time No emergency response data can be provided because this development is near the edge of City limits • Calls for Service 156(within a mile of site between 4/l/19-3/31/20) • Accessibility I No concerns • Specialty/resource needs I None • Crimes 5 (within a mile of site between 4/l/19-3/31/20) • Crashes 4(within a mile of site between 4/l/19-3/31/20) • Other Although located near the edge of City limits,service can be provided if this development is approved. Page 3 Page 145 Item#7. West Ada School District Enrollment Capacity Miles • Distance(elem, 0ev.wschool mS hS) Pleasant View Elementary Opening 20121 650 2.4 f School Y ear Star Middle School 704 1000 6.9 Meridian High School 1965 2400 6.1 Due to the abundant amount of growth in the area,West Ada is actively building new schools,and boundaries are always changing,These future students could potentially attend Owyhee High School. • Capacity of Schools • #of Students Enrolled Wastewater • Distance to Sewer This proposed development is not currently serviceable by Meridian Services Sanitary Sewer service. The sewer trunk line designed to service this development is within The Oaks North Subdivision to the south. • Sewer Shed North McDermott Trunk Shed • Estimated Project Sewer See application ERU's • WRRF Declining 13.92 Balance • Project Consistent with Yes WW Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts/Concerns •Additional 4,662 gpd has been committed •Sewer mains are not allowed in common driveways.Please remove. •The planned sewer trunk line will enter this property at N. Rustic Oak Way •Sewer line in N.Rustic Oak Way shall be 10-inch all the way to Chinden Blvd •This development is subject to paying sanitary sewer reimbursement fees (see Public Works Site Specific Conditions of Approval for detail). Reimbursement fees for the entire subdivision shall be paid prior to city signatures on the first final plat. Water • Distance to Water This proposed development is not currently serviceable by the Meridian Services City water system. Water mainlines designed to service this development are within The Oaks North Subdivision to the south. • Pressure Zone 1 • Estimated Project Water See application ERU's • Water Quality None • Project Consistent with Yes Water Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns None Page 4 Page 146 Item#7. C. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend tsi8enfial Legend f 0 Project Laca-fion I ProjEOf Lacaion t MU- ® Y a 4 3i k MU-R7 JEW � •., f. ,Y )en s fird Ai- EEE� . Zoning Map Planned Development Map f (Legend 0 (fLegend 01 Pra}ect Laca-fion 1 I Protect Lacation _-- t City Limit I I I I � f - + ® — Planned F o v__ r RUT r � S � R-8 T III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Providence Properties,LLC—701 South Allen Street, Ste. 104,Meridian, ID 83642 B. Owners: Joseph Hon— 16790 Rose Park Dr.,Nampa, ID 83687 Raymond Roark—5952 N. Serenity Ln.,Meridian,ID 83646 Page 5 Page 147 Item#7. Lonnie Kuenzli—6210 N. Levi Ln.,Meridian,ID 83646 West Ada School District— 1303 E. Central Dr.,Meridian, ID 83642 C. Representative: Stephanie Leonard,KM Engineering—9233 W. State St.,Boise, ID 83714 IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Notification published in 6/26/2020, 8/28/2020, 11/13/2020,2/5/2021 newspaper l/l/21 Notification mailed to property 6/23/2020, 8/26/2020, owners within 300 feet 12/29/20 11/10/2020,2/2/2021 Applicant posted public hearing notice on site 7/2/2020, 8/27/2020, 1/5/21 11/10/2020,2/4/2021 Nextdoor posting 6/23/2020, 8/27/2020, 11/10/2020,2/2/2021 12/29/20 V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS(Comprehensive Plan) The Future Land Use Map(FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan designates 9 10.27+/-acres along W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 as Mixed Use—Regional(MU-R); and the 113.5+/-acres to the south as Medium Density Residential(MDR). The purpose of the MU-R designation is to provide a mix of employment,retail,and residential dwellings and public uses near major arterial intersections. The intent is to integrate a variety of uses together,including residential, and to avoid predominantly single use developments such as a regional retail center with only restaurants and other commercial uses. Developments should be anchored by uses that have a regional draw with the appropriate supporting uses. The developments are encouraged to be designed consistent with the conceptual MU-R plan depicted in Figure 3D(pg. 3-17). The purpose of the MDR designation is to allow small lots for residential purposes within City limits. Uses may include single-family homes at gross densities of 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The MU-R designated area is located adjacent to a major intersection,W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 and N. McDermott Rd. (future SH-16). The MU-R area is proposed to develop with a medical campus, including a regional hospital, and multi-family apartments.A larger MU-R area than currently designated on the FLUM is proposed which incorporates an additional 9.5+/- acres to the south and east of the current designated area.Because FLUM designations are not parcel specific and the proposed development provides needed services,employment opportunities and housing consistent with that desired in MU-R designated areas, Staff is supportive of the expanded MU-R area provided that a retail component is also included and integrated as part of the development. The MDR designated area is proposed to develop with a mix of single-family attached, detached and townhome units at a gross density of 3-46 2.96 units/acre,which although at the low end of the desired density range, is consistent with that of the MDR designation. Page 6 Page 148 Item#7. The following Comprehensive Plan Policies are applicable to this development: • "Encourage a variety of housing types that meet the needs,preferences,and financial capabilities of Meridian's present and future residents."(2.01.02D) The proposed single-family attached, detached, townhomes and multi family apartments will provide a variety of housing types for future residents in the northwest portion of the City in close proximity to the proposed employment uses on this site and across Chinden Blvd to the north. • "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and urban services at the time of final approval,and in accord with any adopted levels of service for public facilities and services."(3.03.03F) City water and sewer services are not currently available to the subject development, however the main/trunk lines intended to provide service are currently being developed in The Oaks North Subdivision to the south. This development is dependent on the development timing of the phase(s) within The Oaks North for services to be readily available for extension. This developer is attempting to work with The Oaks developer to hasten the timing of utility expansion. • "Avoid the concentration of any one housing type or lot size in any geographical area;provide for diverse housing types throughout the City."(2.01.01 G) Four(4)different housing types are proposed in this development(i.e. single-family attached/detached, townhomes and multi family apartments) along with a wide range of lot sizes for diversity in housing types in this area. • "Encourage compatible uses and site design to minimize conflicts and maximize use of land." (3.07.00) The proposed single-family residential development should be compatible with existing single- family homes to the west in Peregrine Heights and in the development process to the south in The Oaks North and the future school to the east. Larger lot sizes are proposed as a transition to the I-acre lots in Peregrine Heights. Higher density residential uses are planned adjacent to the proposed medical campus at the north boundary and the future school site at the east boundary.A 30 foot wide landscaped buffer with a pedestrian pathway and 8'tall CMU wall is also proposed adjacent to residential uses along the southern and western boundaries of the proposed medical campus to reduce conflicts. • "With new subdivision plats,require the design and construction of pathway connections,easy pedestrian and bicycle access to parks, safe routes to schools,and the incorporation of usable open space with quality amenities."(2.02.01A) A 10'wide multi-use pathway is required within the street buffers along W. Chinden Blvd./SH 20-26 and the north/south collector street(Levi Ln./Rustic Oak), and to the east to the future school site for safe pedestrian access to the school. A large central common area is proposed along the collector street with quality amenities. • "Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Page 7 Page 149 Item#7. Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development." (3.03.03A) The proposed development will connect to City water and sewer systems when available; services are proposed to be provided to and though this development in accord with current City plans. • "Locate higher density housing near corridors with existing or planned transit,Downtown, and in proximity to employment centers."(2.01.01H) The proposed townhomes and multi family apartments in close proximity to the regional hospital and medical campus will provide higher density housing options in close proximity to the employment center and major transportation corridor(i.e. Chinden Blvd/SH2O-26&future SH 16). • "Encourage the development of high quality, dense residential and mixed use areas near in and around Downtown,near employment, large shopping centers,public open spaces and parks, and along major transportation corridors, as shown on the Future Land Use Map."(2.02.01E) Townhomes and a multi family development are proposed in close proximity to the mixed use area along Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26, a major transportation corridor, where employment uses are proposed. • "Maximize public services by prioritizing infill development of vacant and underdeveloped parcels within the City over parcels on the fringe."(2.02.02) The proposed project is located on the fringe of the northwest corner of the City. However, because the land to the north and south has been annexed into the City as well as land located a half mile to the east, services will be extended in this area. Therefore,public services will be maximized by the development of this property. • "Require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks,water and sewer utilities."(3.03.03G) Urban sewer and water infrastructure, when available, and curb, gutter and sidewalks is proposed to be provided as required. • "Annex lands into the corporate boundaries of the City only when the annexation proposal conforms to the City's vision and the necessary extension of public services and infrastructure is provided." (3.03.03) The proposed development plan is consistent with the City's vision in that a mix of uses are proposed including a regional hospital and medical offices in the MU-R designated area adjacent to a major transportation corridor. Residential uses are proposed at densities consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for this area. Public services can be provided and public infrastructure will be extended when available to this site. • "Require collectors consistent with the ACHD Master Street Map(MSM), generally at/near the mid-mile location within the Area of City Impact."(6.01.0313) The MSM depicts a collector street at the half mile between Black Cat and McDermott Roads in the current location of N. Levi Ln. at the northeast corner of the site from W. Chinden Blvd./SH 20-26 to the south to McMillan Rd. A collector street is proposed in accord with the MSM which will connect to N. Rustic Oak Way to the south in The Oaks North subdivision. Page 8 Page 150 Item#7. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in all Mixed Use areas,per the Comprehensive Plan(pg.3-13): (Staffs analysis in italics) • "A mixed-use project should include at least three types of land uses. Exceptions may be granted for smaller sites on a case-by-case basis. This land use is not intended for high density residential development alone." The proposed development includes#mat least three (JJ different land use types—residential off d,office and commercial(retail/restaurant) uses. , to serve the employment area and nearby residents.A public school(i.e. civic use) is planned on the eastern portion of the annexation area; however, it's outside the mixed use designated area and not a part of the proposed development. • "Where appropriate,higher density and/or multi-family residential development is encouraged for projects with the potential to serve as employment destination centers and when the project is adjacent to US 20/26, SH-55, SH-16 or SH-69." Multi family apartments and townhomes are proposed adjacent to the Mixed Use designated area to provide a higher density in close proximity to the employment center located adjacent to W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26. • "Mixed Use areas are typically developed under a master or conceptual plan; during an annexation or rezone request, a development agreement will typically be required for developments with a Mixed Use designation." A Master Plan is proposed with the annexation request which will be incorporated into a Development Agreement to ensure future development is consistent with the Mixed Use designation. • "In developments where multiple commercial and/or office buildings are proposed,the buildings should be arranged to create some form of common,usable area, such as a plaza or green space." The Master Plan depicts shaded itt . area three(3) outdoor courtyard areas ;. Q around the medical office building a large outdoor plaza/ rg een space area in front of the hospital with a shaded seatingarea,rea, and a pedestrian pathway within a 30'wide landscaped common area along the southern and western boundaries of the commercial portion of the development abutting residential uses with two (2) shaded areas of respite. hearing to rej7eet e9mmon usable area smeh as a plaza or green spaee more eentm!to the development with bugd&p anwnged oround the eommon area in aeeord with this prov&ion. • "The site plan should depict a transitional use and/or landscaped buffering between commercial and existing low-or medium-density residential development." There are existing low density homes on 1-acre lots along the west boundary of this site in Peregrine Heights Subdivision adjacent to the area proposed to be zoned C-G and developed with a medical campus.A 30'wide densely landscaped buffer is proposed along the west and south boundaries of the C-G zoned property adjacent to existing and proposed abutting residential uses along with an 8'tall CMU wall as a buffer to future commercial uses. Parking is proposed along these boundaries norM tofiwnf on the main en"drive aisle 6ff W. Rustie Oak "as a better tmnsXon to th residenees to Me south • "Community-serving facilities such as hospitals,clinics, churches, schools,parks, daycares,civic buildings, or public safety facilities are expected in larger mixed-use developments." Page 9 Page 151 Item#7. A future school site is planned on the eastern portion of the annexation area but it is outside the Mixed Use designated area and not a part of this development.A hospital is proposed in the medical campus on the northern portion of the site adjacent to W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 which will provide much needed services in the northern portion of the City. • "Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks,plazas, outdoor gathering areas, open space, libraries,and schools are expected; outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count." A school is planned to develop on the eastern portion of the annexation area but is outside the Mixed-Use designated area and not being developed with this project. Te ..n ui-.sueh spaees- andplaees ���a a Three (3) outdoor courtyard areas are is-proposed jt6±rtt around the medical office building and a large outdoor plaza/green space area with a shaded seating area is proposed in front of the hospital. Two shaded outdoor areas of respite are also proposed within the buffer along the southern boundary of the commercial portion of the development. • "Mixed use areas should be centered around spaces that are well-designed public and quasi- public centers of activity. Spaces should be activated and incorporate permanent design elements and amenities that foster a wide variety of interests ranging from leisure to play. These areas should be thoughtfully integrated into the development and further placemaking opportunities considered." Xe sueh&paees or design elenten"menities are proposed, To ensureAtuie development in the MUR designated area is eonsiqten t with this guid-eline, Staff reeoniniends the eoneept plan " shaded ** - Three (3) outdoor courtyards are proposed ' around the medical office building and a large outdoor plaza/green space area with a shaded seating area is proposed in front of the hospital. Two shaded outdoor areas of respite are also proposed within the buffer along the southern boundary of the commercial portion of the development. • "All mixed-use projects should be directly accessible to neighborhoods within the section by both vehicles and pedestrians." The proposed mixed use development is directly accessible to neighborhoods within the section by a collector street(W. Rustic Oak Way) that runs along the project's east boundary at the half mile between McDermott and Black Cat Roads; a multi-use pathway is planned along the collector street for pedestrian connectivity in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. • "Alleys and roadways should be used to transition from dissimilar land uses, and between residential densities and housing types." There are no roadways separating the commercial/mixed use area from the single-family detached homes and townhomes proposed at the south boundary of the area proposed to be zoned C-G. However, there is a 30-foot wide densely landscaped buffer proposed between the commercial and residential uses. Staff reeemmends as a provision of Me A! that a stmet is • "Because of the parcel configuration within Old Town,development is not subject to the Mixed Use standards listed herein." The subject property is not located in Old Town, therefore, this item is not applicable. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in MU-R areas, per the Comprehensive Plan(pgs.3-16 thru 3-17): Page 10 Page 152 Item#7. • Development should generally comply with the general guidelines for development in all Mixed Use areas. Staffs analysis on the proposed project's compliance with these guidelines is included above. these guideU*es-. • Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 10%of the development area at gross densities ranging from 6 to 40 units/acre. There is neither a minimum nor maximum imposed on non- retail commercial uses such as office, clean industry, or entertainment uses. Multi family uses are proposed at a density of 16.6 units/acre for approximately 27%of the mixed use development area. Non-retail medical office/hospital uses are proposed on the remainder of the mixed use development. • Retail commercial uses should comprise a maximum of 50%of the development area. #e�Retail/restaurant commercial uses (10,000+/-square feet) are proposed on the entire first floor of the medical office building. Because this site is proposed to develop with a medical campus including a regional hospital, retail uses will be minimal but should be provided as a third land use type as desired in mixed use designated areas as discussed above to serve patrons and residents. Where the development proposes public and quasi-public uses to support the development,the developer may be eligible for additional area for retail development(beyond the allowed 50%), based on the ratios below: • For land that is designated for a public use, such as a library or school,the developer is eligible for a 2:1 bonus. That is to say,if there is a one-acre library site planned and dedicated,the project would be eligible for two additional acres of retail development. • For active open space or passive recreation areas, such as a park,tot-lot, or playfield,the developer is eligible for a 2:1 bonus. That is to say, if the park is 10 acres in area,the site would be eligible for 20 additional acres of retail development. • For plazas that are integrated into a retail project,the developer would be eligible for a 6:1 bonus. Such plazas should provide a focal point(such as a fountain, statue, and water feature), seating areas, and some weather protection. That would mean that by providing a half-acre plaza,the developer would be eligible for three additional acres of retail development. This guideline is not applicable as no public/quasi-public uses are proposed in the MU-R designated area. Staff believes the proposed development plan is generally consistent with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan if a commercial(i.e. retail, restaurant, etc.) component is included in the mixed use designated portion of the development as discussed above. VI. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ANALYSIS(UDC) A. Annexation & Zoning: The proposed annexation area consists of si-x-ten(6 10)parcels of land totaling 122.8 128.21 acres designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map(FLUM)as Medium Density Residential(MDR) and Mixed Use—Regional(MU-R). Per the proposed conceptual Master Plans included in Section VIII.A, single-family residential attached and detached homes,townhomes, multi-family apartments and a medical campus featuring a regional hospital and medical office Page 11 Page 153 Item#7. building with retail and restaurant uses is proposed to develop on this site. As dise ss a .,L.oy Staff recommends commereial •Fetail, restaurant, ete.) uses are also provided as p in the C G zoned area as desired in Alixed Use and speeifleally MU R designated areas to serve the employment area and adjaeent neighbffhOod. The medical campus is proposed to include"boutique"medical services geared toward women's health and pediatrics. Two buildings are proposed—a 4 3-story 220,000 181,000+/-square foot (s.f.)hospital with approximately 90 60 in-patient beds and a 44 4-story 90,000 80,000+/- s.f. medical office building which is proposed to include 10,000+/-square feet of retail uses and 10,000+/- square feet of restaurant uses on the entire first floor. Most services anticipated to be performed in the hospital will be out-patient procedures. Areas not used for inpatient beds will be used for surgery,radiology, an emergency department, labor rooms,physical plant and a cafeteria. The hospital is proposed to be similar in scope and size to the St. Luke's and St. Al's campuses in Nampa. West Ada School District plans to develop a public school on the eastern portion of the annexation area separate from this development. The parcel was included in the subject AZ and PP applications because it was created outside of the process required by Ada County to create a buildable parcel. Including it in the proposed plat will allow building permits to be obtained for future development. The single-family attached/detached portion of the development is proposed to be annexed with R-8 zoning(99.53 acres),the townhome and multi-family portions are proposed to be zoned R-15 (8.82 acres)and the medical campus is proposed to be zoned C-G(18.1:7 19.85 acres, including adjacent right-of-way to the section line of W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26),which is generally consistent with the associated MDR and MU-R FLUM designations for the site as discussed above in Section V (see zoning exhibit in Section VIII.B). Proposed Use Analysis: Single-family attached and detached homes and townhouse dwellings are listed as a principal permitted use in the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts;multi-family developments are listed as a conditional use in the R-15 zoning district, subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27; and public education institutions are listed as a conditional use in the R-8 zoning district per the Allowed Uses in the Residential Districts table in UDC Table 11-2A-2, subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-14. A hospital is listed as a conditional use in the C-G district, subject to the specific use standards in UDC 11-4-3-22;and healthcare and social services is listed as a principal permitted use in the C-G district;retail uses are listed as a principal permitted use in the C-G district; and restaurant uses are listed as a principal permitted use in the C-G district, subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-49 per the Allowed Uses in the Commercial Districts table in UDC 11-2B-2. Evaluation of the multi-family development for consistency with the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27 and the hospital's consistency with the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3- 22 will occur with the conditional use permit applications for such uses. One of the standards for hospitals that provide emergency care requires that the location shall have direct access on an arterial street; the proposed hospital is planned to provide emergency care.Because UDC 11- 3H-4B.2 prohibits new approaches directly accessing a State Highway,access is proposed via N.Rustic Oak Way, a collector street,at the project's east boundary located at the half mile mark between section line roads. The City Council should determine if this meets the intent of the requirement,if so, it should be memorialized in the Development Agreement. If not, Alternatively, Council may deny the emergency care component of the hospital use. Note:ITD denied the Applicant's request for access via SH 2O-26/Chinden Blvd. for the medical campus. Page 12 Page 154 Item#7. The property is within the Area of City Impact Boundary(AOCI). A legal description for the annexation area is included in Section VIII.B. The City may require a development agreement(DA) in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. In order to ensure the site develops as proposed with this application and future development meets the Mixed Use and specifically the MU-R guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan, Staff recommends a DA as a requirement of annexation with the provisions included in Section VIII.A. The DA is required to be signed by the property owner(s)/developer and returned to the City within 6 months of the Council granting the annexation for approval by City Council and subsequent recordation. The Applicant requests three(3)separate DA's are required—one for the R-8 and R-15 residential portions of the development, one for the medical campus and another for the school district's parcel. Staff is amenable to this request as there are three(3)distinct components of the project. B. Preliminary Plat: The proposed preliminary plat consists of 433 422 lots—3953777 371 buildable lots [316 single-family residential(94-102 attached 215/detached),6-3,38 townhome, 14 multi-family residential, 1 commercial and 1 school],3-2 39 42 common lots and 6 other(shared driveway)lots on "�423-54 124.81 acres of land in the proposed R-8,R-15 and C-G zoning districts. A portion of the proposed plat is a re-subdivision of Lot 18,Block 1,Peregrine Heights Subdivision, a formerly deed restricted agricultural lot that was only to be used for open space(i.e. non-farm)— this restriction has since expired. The minimum lot size proposed in the single-family residential portion of the development is 4,000 square feet(s.f.)with an average lot size of 6-,060 5,982 s.£; the average townhome lot size is 2-,037 2,302 s.f. The overall gross density is 3-6-3 2.97 units/acre with a net density of 7.M 7.68 units/acre. The gross density of the R-8 zoned portion is 4.P 3.07 units/acre with a net density of 7417.07 units/acre and the gross density of the R-15 zoned portion is 12.97 7.57 units/acre with a net density of 21.33 13.8 units/acre consistent with the density desired in the associated MDR&MU-R FLUM designations in the Comprehensive Plan for this site. Phasing: The residential portion of the subdivision is proposed to develop in nine(9)phases as depicted on the phasing exhibit in Section VIII.0 over a time period of 4 to 5 years. The north/south collector street will be constructed from W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 in alignment with Pollard Ln. across Chinden Blvd. to the north and extend to the southern boundary with the first phase of development. The single family portion of the site will develop first,followed by the townhomes and then the multi-family apartments. The school property(Lot 84, Block 12)are is not included in the phasing plan as they are it is under separate ownership and will develop separately from the residential and commercial portions of the development. The Applicant estimates development of the hospital and medical campus will commence in 2021 at the earliest; and the school in 2023 at the earliest, assuming services are available. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There is an existing home on the Kuenzli property and some old accessory structures on the Roark property that are proposed to be removed with development. All existing structures should be removed prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer for the phase in which they are located. Page 13 Page 155 Item#7. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): Development of the subject property is required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-6 for the R-8 district, 11-2A-7 for the R-15 district and 11-2B-3 for the C-G district as applicable. Lot Layout: The lot layout/development plan for the townhome portion of the development on Lots 16-7-9-, common driveway may only serve a maximum of(6) dwelling units peir UD 6-C units are proposed off each . Private streets are not intended for townhome developments other than those than create a common mew through the site design or that propose a limited gated development-neither a mews nor is proposed but no gates are proposed(alter-native compliance i thiss standard see analysis below in Section 3*71•r hearing.AlteFnaflve Complianee may be requested to these standaFds and apffOved upon recommendation of the City Engineer-,Fire Marshal and the Director when the Applicant can demonstrate than the proposed over-ail design meets or exceeds the intent of the required standards and shall not be detrimental to the publie health, safety and welf-AFe and where private streets are determined to enhance the safety of the development by establishing a clear emergency vehiele travel lane. However,the Fire Dept. and Staff would not be in suppo sueh a request as Staff is of the opinioll M. - . - Meh at the number- of units and density PFOPosed would result in a neighbor-hood that is seveFely undeF par-lied,whieh eould be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare if emerge ' ver-e not able aeeess homes within the development due to parking issues on the private street. Staff Feeommends this POFOOH of the development is Fedesigned with publie stFeets (alleys and/or common driveways may be incorporated), or if private streets are proposed, eaeh unit should&ont on and be aeeessed via the private street(s) and the design should inelude a mew or-gated entr-y in aeeoM with UDC 11 3F I however-,publie streets are preferred. Alter-natively, a multi family development(i.e. one structure on one property with 3 or more dwelling units)with townhome style units might be a development option for-this area.A Y-evised par-king plan should be submitted for-this area as well that pr-ovides for adequate guest par-king above the minimum UDC standards (Table 11 3C- 6)to serwe this portion of the development.A revised eoneept plan and par-king plan should be submitted prior-to or-a Commission hearing for-review and a revised plat should be submitted at least 10 days p to the City Couneil hearing that r-efleets this modifleation. The lot layout/development plan for-the multi family development on Lots 70 83,Bloek 12 depiets parking and aeeess dr-iveways on buildable iots the number of par! with eaeh lot and are not eommensur-ate with the par-king required foff-e-aeh hffl--�- with an ingress egress/par-king easement for-eaeh buildable lot.A Fevised plat should be submitted at least 10 days prior-to the City Coune&1 A revised plat was submitted that depicts the private street in the townhome portion of the development within a common lot as requested, see Section VIIL C. Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards (UDC 11-6C-3) Development of the subdivision is required to comply with the subdivision design and improvement standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3, including but not limited to streets, common driveways and block face. Page 14 Page 156 Item#7. Block length is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3F. Block faces should not exceed 750' in length without an intersecting street or alley unless a pedestrian connection is provided,then the block face may be extended up to 1,000' in length. The face of Block 7 on the south side of W. Smokejumper St. exceeds 750' at approximately 900'+/-;because the preliminary plat for the abutting property to the south did not include a pathway to this site in this location, Staff does not recommend a pathway is required for connectivity as it would dead-end at the subdivision boundary. Other block faces comply with the standard. Common driveways are required to be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11- 6C-3D.A perpetual ingress/egress easement shall be filed with the Ada County Recorder, which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. An exhibit should be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks,fencing,building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via the common driveway; if a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street,the driveway should be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway.Address signage should be provided at the public street for homes accessed via common driveways for emergency wayfinding purposes. Access(UDC 11-3A-3) Access is proposed via one(1) collector street(N. Rustic Oak Way)from W. Chinden Blvd./SH 20- 26,which extends through the site to the south boundary and will eventually extend to McMillan Rd.with development of The Oaks North subdivision to the south.A local street access (W. Sturgill Peak St.)is proposed via N.McDermott Rd., a collector street, at the project's west boundary. A stub street(N. Jumpspot Ave.) is proposed to the out-parcel at the southwest corner of the site— Staff recommends W. Smokejumber St. is also stubbed to this property from the east;two (2) stub streets(N. Trident Ave. and N. Rustic Oak Way) are proposed to the south for future extension with The Oaks North subdivision; and two(2) stub streets(N. Serenity Ave. &W. Fireline Ct.) are proposed to the north for future extension—the stub street to Serenity Ln.will serve as an emergency access only to Peregrine Heights Subdivision and will have bollards preventing public access.A collector street(W. Ramblin St.)is proposed for access to the school site. A stub street (Sunfield Way)was approved with The Oaks North preliminary plat to Lot 37,Block 12,proposed as a common lot;this street is not proposed to be extended. The ACHD report states Sunfield Way cannot be extended into the site at this time as the stub street is aligned with the parcel line between this site and the school parcel.ACHD has required a permanent right-of-way easement to be provided and a road trust for the future extension of Sunfield Way with development of the school parcel. Cross-access/ingress-egress easements should be provided to adjacent MU-R designated properties to the west(Parcels#R6991221700&R6991221600) and east(Parcel# R6991222101)in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A.2. As discussed above,a private street loop(N.Highfire Loop)is proposed for access to the townhome portion of the development in Block 8 adjacent to the southern boundary of the commercial development(see analysis below under Private Streets). Staff is not supportive of the proposed revised design and r-eeommends revisions to the plan as stated above and in 8 e re t-*aq INI EX.A. The Applicant's proposal to curve McDermott Rd. north of Sturgill Peak St.to the east at the project's west boundary does not meet ACHD policy and is not approved; the ACHD report states construction of this portion of McDermott will be completed in conjunction with ITD's SH-16 extension. Page 15 Page 157 Item#7. Developments along SH 2O-26 are required to construct a street generally paralleling the state highway that is no closer than 660 linear feet(measured from centerline to centerline)from the intersection(i.e.Rustic Oak)with the state highway.The purpose of which is to provide future connectivity and access to all properties fronting the state highway that lie between the subject property and the nearest section line road and/or half mile collector road.The street shall be designed in accord with the standards set forth in UDC 11-3H-4B.3 and shall collect and distribute traffic.Frontage streets or private streets may be considered by the council at the time of property annexation or through the conditional use process.Frontage streets and private streets shall be limited to areas where there is sufficient access to surrounding properties and a public street is not desirable in that location. A frontage road is proposed along the northern boundary of the site adjacent to Chinden Blvd. with an access on Rustic Oak approximately 660' south of Chinden as depicted on the conceptual development plan in Section VIII.A.Because residential homes exist to the west that are not likely to redevelop in the near future,a future interchange for SH-16 is planned east of the McDermott/Chinden intersection, and a north/south collector street(Rustic Oak) exists along the east boundary of this site, Staff believes there is sufficient access to surrounding properties as proposed without the provision of a public street. Emergency access:In response to the Fire Department's estimated response time to the development, which are below the target goal on the McDermott side of the subdivision, the Applicant plans to include an AED(Automated External Defibrillator)device in the clubhouse and provide education related to the use of the device to ensure residents are aware of the benefits and function if the device is needed. Additionally, a connection is proposed from Chinden through the project to the southern boundary of the subdivision with the first phase of development to aid in emergency response times to the site; this should also benefit response times to The Oaks North to the south. Parking(UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided for residential uses in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6; and for non-residential uses in accord with the standards listed in 11-3C- 6B.1. Future development should comply with these standards. A parking exhibit(and details in the narrative)was submitted with this application, included in Section VIILF that depicts 46 15 extra off-street parking spaces in the townhome portion of the development and a total of 505 497 on- street parking spaces available for guest parking. A total of 16 off-street parking spaces are proposed for the 3,750+/-square foot clubhouse and swimming pool facility. Staff is of the opinion the proposed parking in the single-family and townhomes portions of the development should meet the parking needs. Off-street parking in the multi-family portion of the development will be evaluated with the conditional use permit application. Off-street parkin is s required to be provided for the commercial portion of the development in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-6B for commercial uses with the exception of restaurant uses; off-street parking for restaurant uses is required per the standards listed in UDC II- 4-3-49. Off-street parkin is s depicted on the conceptual Master Plan in accord with these standards and will reviewed again with the final design of the site to ensure consistency with these standards. Pathways(UDC 11-3A-8): The Pathways Master Plan depicts segments of the City's multi-use pathway system across this site. In accord with the Plan,the Park's Dept. recommends detached 10' wide multi-use pathways are provided within the street buffers in the following locations: along N. McDermott Rd.,W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26,the east side of N. Rustic Oak Way from Chinden to the southern boundary of the site, and along W. Ramblin St. from Rustic Oak to the school site. These pathways are required to be placed in a 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement. Page 16 Page 158 Item#7. Other pathways and micro-paths through common areas are also proposed for pedestrian interconnectivity and access within the development. Two(2)micro-path connections to the school site are proposed in addition to the multi-use pathway connection from Rustic Oak that extends along the northern boundary of the multi-family development. All pathways shall be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8 and landscaping shall be provided on either side of the pathways as set forth in UDC 11-3B-12C. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-1 : Detached sidewalks are required to be provided along all arterial and collector streets; attached(or detached) sidewalks may be provided along internal local streets. Sidewalks are proposed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17, ept f r along the east side of Rustie Oak north o W. Lost Rapids St.,where an attaehed 7' wide sidewalk is proposed. This sidewalk should be detac-hCd from the in aeeor-i-"with iTcir v C 11 3A rr. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-1 : Eight-foot wide parkways are proposed adjacent to the north/south collector street(N. Rustic Oak Way) and are required to be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17 and landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C.AWe. The MN.. eo- Plat ine!Hded Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): Street buffers are required to be provided within the development as follows: a 35-foot wide street buffer is required along W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 and N. McDermott Rd., an entryway corridor; and a 20' wide buffer is required along N. Rustic Oak Way,'`T N 4ef ffm t D a. and W. Ramblin St., collector streets, landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. A 25' wide buffer is required on the C-G zoned property to residential uses as set forth in UDC Table 11-2B-3, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-9C. The buffer area should be comprised of a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs, lawn or other vegetative groundcover that results in a barrier that allowed trees to touch at the time of maturity. A 30-foot wide buffer is proposed with dense landscaping along the western and southern boundaries of the site adjacent to residential uses as required. Parkways where provided are required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. The total linear feet of parkways with the required and proposed number of trees should be included in the Landscape Calculations table on the final plat landscape plan to demonstrate compliance with the required standards. Landscaping is required along all pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C. The total lineal feet of pathways with the required and proposed number of trees should be included in the Landscape Calculations table on the final plat landscape plan to demonstrate compliance with UDC standards. Common open space is required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G- 3E. The total square footage of common open space with the required and proposed number of trees should be included in the Landscape Calculations table on the final plat landscape plan to demonstrate compliance with the UDC standards. Parking lot landscaping is required to be provided in the commercial portion of the development in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-8C. If any existing trees on the site are proposed to be removed,mitigation may be required per the standards listed in UDC 11-313-1OC.5. The Applicant should coordinate with Matt Perkins, Page 17 Page 159 Item#7. the City Arborist,to determine mitigation requirements if any existing trees are not proposed to be retained on site. Noise abatement is required to be provided in the form of a berm or a berm and wall combination parallel to W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3H-4D. A detail/cross-section of the proposed noise abatement should be submitted with the final plat application for the commercial portion of the development that demonstrates compliance with the required standards. Qualified Open Space(UDC 11-3G1: A minimum of 10%qualified open space meeting the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B is required for the residential portion of the development. Based on 105.08 80.42 acres (excluding the 28-acre school parcel), a minimum of 40.5f 8.04 acres of qualified open space should be provided. A qualified open space exhibit was submitted, included in Section VIII.E,that depicts 11.56 12.4 acres(or 44-.9 15.41%, excluding the 28-acre school parcel) of open space consisting of the entire buffer along collector streets(McDermott&Rustic Oak), open space areas of at least 50' x 100' in area and linear open space in accord with UDC standards. Note:Although a couple of the lots (i.e. Lot 30, Block 1 and Lot 29, Block 9) counted toward qualified open space don't meet the minimum dimensional standards of 50'x 100', the rest of the area does qualify which still exceeds the minimum standards. Because the multi-family portion of the development is proposed to be subdivided with each 4- plex on its own individual lot for the option of separate ownership of the 4-plex buildings, Staff recommends a provision is included in the DA that requires one management company handle the leasing and maintenance of the entire project to ensure better overall consistent management of the development. Qualified Site Amenities(UDC 11-3G1 A minimum of(1)site amenity is required for every 20 acres of development area. Based on the residential area of the proposed plat(105.09 80.42 acres), a minimum of€rve four(5 4)qualified site amenities are required to be provided per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3C. A site amenity exhibit and renderings are included in Section VIII.E. A 3,750+/- square foot clubhouse with restrooms, an exercise area, office and meeting room with an outdoor patio and a 54' x 30'+/-swimming pool, one large tot lot on Lot 1,Block 9 and(2) smaller tot lots on Lot 1,Block 13 and Lot 12,Block 6 with children's play equipment, an enclosed 5,500+/- s.f. dog park(although this area may be just a pocket park with no dog facilities depending on what is desired by future residents), segments of the City's multi-use regional pathway system, and additional qualified open space exceeding 20,000 square feet are proposed as amenities in excess of UDC standards.Amenities are proposed from the following categories listed in UDC 1I- 3G-3C: quality of life,recreation and pedestrian or bicycle circulation system, in accord with UDC standards. Details of these amenities should be submitted with the final plat applications for the phases in which they are located. Storm Drainage(UDC 11-3A-IS): An adequate storm drainage system is required in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. Design and construction shall follow Best Management Practice as adopted by the City. Sub-surface drainage is proposed but swales could be incorporated if needed. Page 18 Page 160 Item#7. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-15): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided in each development as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. This property is within the Settler's Irrigation District and the Nampa& Meridian Irrigation District's boundaries. Waterways(UDC 11-3A- : The West Tap Sublateral runs east/west across the southern portion of this site within a 20' wide drainage district easement;and a 15' wide irrigation easement runs east/west across the northern portion of the site as depicted on the Peregrine Heights subdivision plat. This waterway is planned to be relocated and piped. If the easement(s)for the waterway is greater than 10' in width,it should be placed in a common lot that is a minimum of 20' in width and outside of a fenced area,unless modified by City Council in accord with UDC 11-3A-6E. All waterways are required to be piped unless used as a water amenity of linear open space as defined in UDC 11-1A-1 in accord with UDC 11-3A-6B. Fencing(UDC 11-3A- : All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6C and 11-3A-7. Fencing is depicted on the landscape plan. Fences abutting pathways and common open space lots not entirely visible from a public street is required to be an open vision or semi-private fence up to 6' in height as it provides visibility from adjacent homes or buildings per UDC 11-3A-7A.7. Staff is concerned there is not enough visibility from the street of the common area on Lot 1,Block 2 located behind building lots and around Lot 37,Block 12 and recommends the fencing type is revised on the perimeter of these lots to comply with this standard. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): The Applicant submitted sample photo elevations and renderings of the different home types planned to be constructed in this development which are included in Section VIII.G.Homes depicted are a mix of I-and 2-story units of varying sizes for the variety of lot sizes proposed. Building materials consist of a mix of finish materials with stoneibrick veneer accents. Because the side and/or rear of 2-story homes that face collector streets(i.e.N.McDermott Rd.,N.Rustic Oak Way and W.Ramblin St.)will be highly visible,these elevations,should incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g. projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street.Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. Conceptual renderings of the hospital and medical office buildings were submitted as shown in Section VIII.G. The hospital is proposed to be a 3-story building and the medical office building a 4-story building. The elevations for the medical office building incorrectly depict a 3-story building; these elevations should be revised prior to the City Council hearing to reflect the correct number of stories. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted and approved prior to submittal of any building permit applications for the medical office building, hospital,clubhouse, swimming pool facility, single-family attached,townhome and multi-family structures. The design of such is required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual.Design review is not required for single-family detached homes. Page 19 Page 161 Item#7. C. Private Streets (UDC H- A private street loop(N. Highfire Loop)is proposed for access within the portion of the development where townhomes are proposed on Lots 17 78 17-44 and 54-67,Block 8 adjacent to the southern boundary of the commercial development. The Applicant believes a private street in this area will enhance safety and vehicular circulation by creating a clear path of travel for emergency vehicles and residential traffic. Mews nor^ gated developme t A mew is proposed but no gates are proposed as the Applicant believes a gate would detract from site circulation and would physically and figuratively disjoint the townhomes from the rest of the community. Private streets are not intended for townhome developments other than those that create a common mew through the site design or that propose a limited gated residential development per UDC 1I- 3F-1. The applicability may be extended where the Director or Fire Marshall determines that private streets will enhance the safety of the development. The Applicant t requests alternative^ rrianee to UPC 11 3F I to " t development as Ion e , thout (s) or agated �Alternative -�a�=o��v- �cc�=���r��c� � Compliance is no longer necessary as a mew is proposed on the revised plan. As noted above in Seetion AILB,Lot Layout, Staff r-eeommends ehanges to the layout of the portion of the plat where the private street is proposed. Staff and the Fire Dept. does n believe safety is enhaneed by the provision of a private street in this area with the density and likelihood of vehieles parking iH fiFe lanes due to inadequaey of par-ling for guests and overflow par-ling. TheFefffe, Staff does no!reeommend approval of the private street as redesign. D. AlteMative Complianee (UDC- 11 B-�} belief that the townhome poftion eft the--,�-P-,Velepment will better-in4egr-ate with the rest of the Pr-esee#Ridge eomffmnity and will be easily aeoessible and usable without a gated eatFy a-Rd will pr-evide a safer-path of travel for-emer-geney vehieles, Reeause Staff is not supportive of the proposed design of the townhome portion of the development with the private street, Staff is in turn not suppor-five of the request for- alter-native eomplianee.As noted abolve in Seetion ALLB,Lot Layout, Staff Feeommends ehanges to the layout of this portion of the plat.A subsequent request may be eonsider-ed if warranted by the .Because a mew is now proposed on the revised plans, alternative compliance is no longer necessary. VII. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation and zoning with the requirement of a Development Agreement and approval of the requested preliminary plat with the conditions noted in Section IX.A and denial of the request for a private street and alternative compliance per the Findings in Section X. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on(continued from July 16t'and August 20t1i September 17,2020.At the public hearing,the Commission moved to continue the subject AZ and PP requests to a subsequent Commission hearing in order for the Applicant to revise the concept plan for the commercial/medical campus and plat for the townhome portion of the development. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ Page 20 Page 162 Item#7. a. In favor: Stephanie Leonard,KM Engineering&Patrick Connor(Applicant's Representative); Betsy Huntsin e�presenting the proposed hospital, Randall Peterman(adjacent property owner),Mitch Armuth,Providence Properties b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Val Stack and Paul Hoyer; Sue Ropski; Cory Coltrin; Randall Peterman d. Written testimony: Josh Femreite, Chief of New Schools for Gem Innovation Schools e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: Joe Bon ig orno 2. Key issue(s) testimony a. Gem Innovation School is in strong support of the project as their future campus lies aqpproximately 300 yards to the south and will be able to provide K-12 public education options for future residents; b. Would like 30' buffer extended along entire east and south boundaries of Pere rg ine Heights Subdivision for a buffer to higher density residential uses; would like more of a transition to the lots at the southeast corner of Peregrine Heights Subdivision either with larger lots or common area instead of 5 building lots; not in favor of proposed access via Serenity Ln.; concern pertaining to future access for Serenity Ln.residents via Chinden; concern pertaining to obstruction of view sheds with proposed 4-story structures on commercial portion of development. C. Ms. Ropski's concern with location of trash dumpsters and parking ad to their ro e d. Preference for the hospital to be located closer to the Chinden/Rustic Oak intersection away from low density residential lots at west boundary e. Mr. Peterman is in favor of the proposed development as it will bring services to his property for development. 3. Ke, ids)of discussion by Commission: a. Preference for owner-occupied townhomes rather than rental or more multi-family in the portion currently proposed for townhomes; b. Preference for the Applicant to obtain the out-parcel at northeast corner of site in order to develop commercial(retail,restaurant, etc.)uses on the site, C. In favor of the variety in housing types and lot sizes proposed; d. Not in favor of the proposed design of the townhome portion of the development and the private streets—needs to be redesigned; e. The Fire Dept.'s preference for a direct unhindered access to the site via Serenity (i.e.not obstructed byagate,bollards or a chain) pposed to right-in/right-out at Serenity Ln./Chinden Blvd. as a fire engine will not be able to access the site from the east via Chinden. f. Conceptual development plan for the commercial/medical campus portion of the site needs to be revised as discussed. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. None C. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items again on October 22'. At the public hearing on October 22',the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_: a. In favor: Patrick Connor,Providence Properties (Applicant's Representative);Betsy Huntsin eg r,representing the proposed hospital b. In opposition: None Page 21 Page 163 Item#7. C. Commenting: Cary Pitman; Sue Ropski;Val Stack; Doug Haneborg; Heidi Wilson; Charles Hay; Bonnie Layton,WH Pacific(representing property owner to the west of Pere rgrine Hei hts d. Written testimony:None e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. Preference for the parking on the east side of the 3-story medical office buildingto o be relocated to the west side of the building and the building shifted further to the east so that the building is further away from adjacent residential properties; b. Concern pertaining to traffic on Serenity Ln. if it were to be open to the south and the safety of children as there are no sidewalks along the private street; C. Concern pertaining to future restriction of right-in/right-out access to Serenity Ln. from Chinden Blvd. and resulting delays for emergency services to Peregrine Heights; C. Request for provision of a fence or a gate at the south end of the Serenity Ln. cul-de-sac to keep it private-, d. Request for the larger estate lots that abut the south end of Peregrine Heights to be carried over to the south side of W. Tanker Dr.; e. Property owner to the west of Peregrine Heights is in favor of the proposed frontage road along Chinden Blvd. for access to the collector street. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. The provision of an electronic gate at the south end of Serenity Ln. for emergency access to Peregrine Heights and to keep the lane private; b. Impacts to the design of the site if the outparcel at the northeast corner of the site isn't purchased by the Developer and developed as part of this site; C. Trash enclosures should be located away from adjacent residential properties; d. In support of the reduction in height from 4-to 3-stories for the hospital and medical office building; e. Preference for the medical office building to be shifted further to the east and/or rotated; f. The provision of only one(1)mew in the townhome portion of the development. f. In general support of the revisions made to the concept plan for the commercial portion of the development. h. Would like the Applicant to work with ITD on noise abatement along the west boundary adjacent to SH-16; i. In favor of the walkability of the development and especially the medical campus; hi support of the changes to the townhome portion of the development and the additional open space; k. Would like the Applicant to work with Staff to reduce the number of lots along the southern boundary of the subdivision to provide a better transition to planned R-4 zoned lots in The Oaks subdivision. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Requirement for noise abatement to be provided along the project's west boundary along N. McDermott Rd. adjacent to the future extension of SH-16 (see Section IX.A.la.7 and A.3a); b. Relocate the parking on the east side of the medical office building to the west side of the building and shift the building further to the east away from the adjacent residential properties(see revised concept plans in Section VIII.A); C. The Applicant shall work with Staff to provide an electronic,gate that is approved by the Fire Dept. for access to Serenity Ln. from the south(see DA provision#A.la.6 in Section IX); and, Page 22 Page 164 Item#7. d. Reduce the number of lots along the southern boundary to provide better transition to the R- 4 properties planned to the south in The Oaks subdivision(lots were reduced by 5 along the south and southeast boundaries, see revised plat in Section VIII.C). 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. Council should determine if the proposed access to the hospital via N. Rustic Oak Way, a collector street, meets the intent of the UDC(11-4-3-22),which requires hospitals that provide emergency care to have direct access on an arterial street.ITD denied a request for direct access via Chinden Blvd. for the emergency care component of the hospital per the letter to the Applicant dated May 5. 2020 included in the public record. Alternatively, Council may deny the emergency care component of the hospital use. D. The Meridian City Council heard these items on December 1,2020.At the public hearing the Council moved to remand the project back to the Commission in order for the out-parcel at the northeast corner of the site to be included in the annexation area and development plan for the site. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Patrick Connor,Providence Properties and Stephanie Leonard,KM Engineering(Applicant's Representatives) b. In opposition.None c. Commenting: Cary Pitman;Doug Haneborg; Cory Coltrin d. Written testimony: Randall Peterman(in favor) e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: Clint Dolsbv, Joe Bongiorno, Steve Sjddoway 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Concern pertaining to the width of the frontage road and access to site from Serenity b. Preference for the hospital to be shifted as far east as possible away from adjacent residents—concern that the 3-story building will overlook the rear yard of adjacent residential properties; c. Desire for a gated entrance to the medical campus portion of the site from Serenity Ln. to prohibit public access/traffic on Serenity Ln.; d. Concerns pertaining to light trespass on adjacent residential properties from the medical campus;noise; odors;need for more of a transition in lot sizes to lot at the southeast corner of Peregrine Heights where there are 4:1 lots proposed; concern pertaining to Fire Dept.response time; location of water& sewer stubs to Peregrine Heights; location of fire hydrants in relation to Peregrine Heights. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Fire response time to the site: b. Subdivision of the multi-family portion of the site allowingfor or separate ownership of individual apartment structures and concern pertaining to consistent exterior maintenance—should maintenance be governed by the HOA instead of a property management company to ensure consistent and timely pkeep of the development? C. Preference for the out-parcel at the northeast corner of the site to be included in the annexation area and development plan for the site. Council is not in favor of annexing the medical campus portion of the site without the out-parcel;remand back to the Commission for inclusion of the out-parcel in the annexation application. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. None Page 23 Page 165 Item#7. E. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on January 21,2021. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Patrick Connor,Providence Properties; Stephanie Hopkins,KM Engineering (Applicant's Representative) b. In opposition: Cory Coltrin c. Commenting: James Jacobson,Attornerepresentin_ Peregrine Heights Homeowner's Association, Sue Ropski; Cary Pitman; Doug Haneborg d. Written testimony: Stephanie Hopkins,Applicant's Representative(response to the staff re ort e. Staff presenting gpplication: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. Opposed to development of a medical campus directly ad to Peregrine Heights residential subdivision and request for C-G zoning to be denied; b. Concerns pertaining to where medical waste containers will be located, location of loading docks next to residential,opposed to 4-story medical office building structure which will obstruct views,location of frontage road/emergency access along north boundary of Peregrine Heights Subdivision from Chinden Blvd.; c. Not enough buffer between existing residential properties and proposed commercial development; d. Objections to a frontage road/emergency access driveway at the north end of Pere rg ire Heights subdivision along Chinden Blvd.; e. Concern pertaining to lightpass from the commercial site on the adjacent residential properties; e. Clarification from the Applicant that this is not a trauma center—most business will be related to women's health procedures and not emergency services. 3. Ke. ids)of discussion by Commission. a. Supportive of the continued changes that have made to the development plan by the Developer at the request of Staff and the neighbors; b. In favor of the proposed medical campus in this location of the City and belief it's an appropriate use for the MU-R desi Hated property, c. Empathy for the impacts to the residential property owners adjacent to MU-R designated property and proposed commercial development; 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Add requirement for the buffer along the west boundary of the site to incorporate a 2- foot tall berm with an 8-foot tall wall on top of the berm to assist in blocking the noise from the commercial development. This requirement is contingent upon approval from the Peregrine Heights HOA; otherwise,if not approved by the HOA, landscaping and the wall shall be installed as proposed on the concept plan(see DA provision#A.lb.9 in Section IX). 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. Council should determine if the proposed access to the hospital via N. Rustic Oak Way, a collector street,meets the intent of the UDC(11-4-3-22),which requires hospitals that provide emergency care to have direct access on an arterial street.ITD denied a request for direct access via Chinden Blvd. for the emergency care component of the hospital per the letter to the Applicant dated May S, 2020 included in the public record. Alternatively, Council may deny the emergency care component of the hospital use. Page 24 Page 166 Item#7. C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on February 23,April 13.and May 18,2021. At the public hearing on May 18',the Council moved to approve the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing a. In favor: Patrick Connor,Providence Properties; Stephanie Hopkins,KM Engineering b. In opposition:None c. Commenting: Sue Ropski:Kristy Inselman,ACHD: Val Stack d. Written testimony:None e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Concern pertaining to the frontage road and height of the proposed structures: b. Clarification on the number of rental properties allowed within the development(up to 20%)through the CC&R's: C. Concern pertaining to safety and access to the commercial portion of the site. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Concern pertaining to direction of potential legislation in regard to property taxes and hesitancy to move forward with this application until more information is known. Council moved to continue this application to April 13';public testimony will be limited to new information only- b. Differing opinions pertaining to whether or not the hospital should serve as a trauma center(with associated uses)with an emergency room—some reasons against were because access isn't available from an arterial street and because of impacts to residential neighbors(i.e.helicopters); 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. Council deemed access for the emergency room via Rustic Oak, a collector street,meets the intent of the requirement in UDC 11-4-3-22A for direct access to be provided on an arterial street; also,that the hospital would not pursue being designated as a trauma center. Page 25 Page 167 Item#7. VIII. EXHIBITS A. Master Plan Conceptual Rendering&Medical Campus Conceptual Development Plan-REVISED US-HIGHWAY 251CHINOEN BLVD a171 � -- PROPOSED , PRE SCOTT __ MEDICAL CAMPUS RIDGE MERIDIAN,IDAHn CONCEPRfA4 suaie.�rrocrrArv�e �.._ .,I�--- r --- - ILITURE i - SCHOOL SITE I o - HYTURE OAK5 NORTR SUBOIV1530N reposed Page 26 Page 168 Item#7. Concept Plan (dated: 1/19/211: SITE INFORMATION W.CIIINOEN�Cyp, SIiE utEA: 19.3+vAES Cn U.34a SF) wRRE.rr zaxlxa RUT PRCPOSEO MNING. C-G CVI�Gk�Nlyym PLWGEM 20NN6'. IaR(FAST.NEST,53x1H}/Nz R L-6(TpRIH) SF x x.nWxGs Noa fa sroxrl 2 Ill. V JIII RSTNE- •G,coo � 6�ESTwruur-'m°o�oo sF rns.ttEss { nx wuxnum Hosvxu C.erns) Euor.�•[Fn ice[ '•e_ �••. ,,,_� F'= L� f— = Q nn MM REWPM: WIOIHG --261.0 5F 1 - I:` •E — - = sEiNacNs R[n c� 2 m SPI.eeS �� X_ 'I f Vg REquREN ~� W READ 0 REauREG O W Itif�lll lII1Lnl r RIIIIII1Ilf11Illlllllll. sMrtE (auEceoRy 2.NaEourtID 9m ST4Esi IEMR2 LORR) ,15'REONRER _ Y xf In/wcln urt TO NESI�ENINL 25 xEOUNEe a a WNG HEICM: ss 2 ^v + rxs v $E3 GI HEIGHT: 53 — — uTNooR eu2A� Nrnlic zc� _ — - xOSRiAs Mrx SGIIxG NVArtu _ J Y arm 36 rya e� Ns�rA a HnWT cW WAIL � xs _ ut2m+�co••Ernox vo LL1l�J R I�1- ll111I E N G I N E E ES'�_N G km awrc via 8'HfRHT py NeIL -- P�'� b� �W / s� w 7 150300 450 Pi.. stale=1"=3.50' ��fAY mrar+66 Page 27 Page 169 Item#7. B. Annexation&Zoning Legal Descriptions and Exhibit Maps C-G HONING LEGEND ` — — —— — n Er —k-15 I I RUT o r °ma m R-1� o� I I RUT I �• lam ' R— ry G ry E E A I N G s _ 1 OF 1d r® J R-4 ��II RUT Lf— .. - LA=L _ _ `L7 6 300 607 R-8 R--A plan scale::"=7nr Page 28 Page 170 Item#7. km E H G r N E E R I N G December 17,2020 ProjKl:No.18.140 Exhibit A Legal Description for Annexation Rresratt Ridge Subdiv Mon A perreI of land situated I n a portion of the West 112 of the Northeast 1/4-0nd a pgil lark of the West 1/2 of Section 29,Township 4 North,Range 1 West, Doise Merldlan,Ada County,ldaha and heing mare particularly described as follows: Con rnerticing at an aluminum cap marking the Northwest tourer said Section 28, which bears N89'27'17"W a distance of 2,609.40 feet from irrl alurnlrtum cap marking the North 1/4 cornerof said Section 28, thence following the northerly line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 28, S89'27 L7"E A distance of 1,484.69 feet to tha POINT OF BEGINNING, Thence following said northerly liner 589'27'17"E a distance of 1,124.74 feet to said aluminurn Cap marking the North 1/4 corner; Thence leaving Said northerly line of said Northwest 114 and fellowirr�the northerly Ilne of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 213,5&9'25'25"E a distance of 60.00 feet to a paint; Thence leaving said northerly Ilne•SO0"43'55"W a distarkre of 558.89 feet to a point; 7herlce S89`24'23"E a distance of 1,24E.58 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar on the easterly We of the West 112 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 28; Thence fol lowirr$said easterly liner SW 6'13'W a distance of 1,615.76 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence Ieaving said easterly line, N77-58'17"W a distance of 1,33E-Z� feet to a 518•inch rebaran the easterPy line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 28; Thence following said easterly 114% S0O"43'55'W a distance of 625.95 feet to 2-inch plpe marking the Center 1/4 of said$et#ion 28; Thence la2vinLg said easterly line,S00'43'5:V W a distance of 24.35 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence S53'05'530W a distance of 16.53 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar, Thence N78'07'38"U4r a distance of 19.68 feet to a 5/9.inch rebar; 7hence 589%8'46"W a distance of45.49 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Than N$6°14'49"Ord a distance of 63.62 feet to a 5/Sinch rebar; 7hencia N88'50'0eW a distance of 85.57 feet to a 5/34rich rehsr; Thence N80'59'54'VV a distance of 36.99 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence N70`27'41"VV a distance of 25.64 feet to a 5J8-inch rebar; Thence S89'15'0O"W a distance of 20,04 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence N86'53'33"W a distance of 189,53 feet to a 5/8-Inch rebar; Thence 564-04'03"W a distance of 27.64 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence N89` A'25 UV a distance of 784.53 feet to a paint; -thence M0X5Z'21"E a distance of 16.96 feet to a point being the Center West 1/16 corner of said Section 2$; Thence fallowingfallowingwing the southerly IIne of:he Northwest 1/4 of said Section 28, N89°27'12"W a dk5oxe 0{ 686,O3 feet to a paint; Thence leaving said southerly line,N01'OD'37"E a distance of 400.00 feet to a paint; 9233 West Sta#s Stroet & Boise,PdO110 83714 * 208.538,5939 + kmvngllp.wrn Page 29 Page 171 Item#7. Thence N89'21'12"W a dl5tance of 625_-00 feet to a paint on the westerly line of the Northwest 1{4 of sold Section 28; Thence following said westerly line,I~01°00'37"E a d lstaoce of 690,74 feet t0 9 paint; Thence leaving said westerly line,S73'33'16"E a dlstance of 483.50 feet to a paint; Thence 578'W16"E a distance of WE feet to a point; Thence S46'W01"E a distance of 299,29 feet to a point;; Thence N75'51'12"E a distance of 48.11 Feet to a point; Thence N00'52'17"E a distance of 21S-98feet to a 1/2--inch rebar, Thence N7S'32'13'E a dis[we of 272.40 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; Thence 30-50 feet along the arc of a Jrcular curve to the left,said Curve having a radius of 45.00 feet,a delta angle of 38'56'33",a chard bea-iri8 of N75'n'S3"E and a Chord dEsta of 3Q_00 fleet to a 1/2-inch rebar; Thence N7532'13'E d distame of 219.13 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; Thence NOX32'13"E a distance of 1,497,29 feet to a V2-inch rebar, Thence 569'19'13"W a distance a#270.56 feet to a 1/2-Inch rebar; Thence N3VW35"W d distance of 8'-73 feet to a point; TherWe 53-14 feet along the arc of a[ircular curve to the right,said curve having d radius of 115.00 feet, 2 delta angle of 26'2WW,a chard bearing of K18'41'13"W and a chord distance of 52_67 feet to a 5/8- inch rebar; Thence N00'32'43'E a distance of 125.29 feet to the POINT 4F UEGINNING- Said parcel contains a total of 128.207 acres,more or less_ Attached hereto Is Exhibit B and by this reference is hereby n1 ade a part of. ST 12459 b ' OF % L SOX, Cilem Project Name PAGE i 2 Page 30 Page 172 Item#7. FWLAINUiA CFP p o POINT OF REGINNING N 1/4 CORNER t- BASIS 6F 8€ARING SECTION 28 ❑ C 20 21 W.Chinden BW{Hwy 20/26i CL ❑ _ _S89'27'17"E 2609,48' L7 ❑ 29 28 ia64.66' — — 1124.74' — — - _ _ '� u c m POINT OF COMMENCEMENT = ALUMINUMWW CORNER P L1B Mt9 tSST29�V23"E Q -1 SECTION 28 fl N rl P N (] � o � m r` 1248,58' C U) 2 Z W < Q} s H " tm + Cc ❑ C1` fV C 4 J O M� fl 250 500 1004 a w LLxJ a J O SCALE: 1"=540' Annexation Area 198.207±AC, 8 50428233640,R5991222210,S0428120950, ° ! S>v'33'}e SO428131315,SO428131200,R6991222101&S0428211102 o 4a Current Zoning:RUT d a '�0' S78•QS•Ts E tti� � a « v �8,77• 1.Sfi C} � Q 6 M1 548.68•U}"E J DATE: DEEEPABERPWQ PROJECT: U-IQ N89'21'12"W M7Tsa'T7 SHEET: 825.OQ' W 1 OF 2 o M1 b 40 _ O � 0 o CENTE(t-WESr }/16 DDRNER a OF SECTION 28 2 PIPE E CENTER OF S£C710N 28 z N8ff 2l'l2"W 68&03' f y y BRAS_ CAP LI N89'}4'25"W 789.53' �, — — W 1/4 CORNER km SECTION 28 r LID L9 ~ J' ENGro1EEAS-SURYEYOAS.AVNNERS 5233 VK5T STRTESTAEET L}1 L2 EIOISEr 1D M083714 �L12 L7 Lfi PNQN(I2osl(J9 5935 L6_— —1-4 L3 FAN WGI 6394910 Page 31 Page 173 Item#7. a � ,r a, `a e LINE TABLE LINE TABLE ° � zo LINE I BEARING I DISTANCE LINE BEARING DISTANCE ov Ll SOF25'25"E 60.00 L15 W52'17"E 215.98 t} Q L2 S743'51"W 24.35 L16 N75'32'131 272.40 i.3 553'05'5314 16.53 L17 147532'13"E 219-13 m L4 N75'07'381Y 18.t38 L18 S6Wl8'13'W 270.56 N „0 115 S8918'461W 45.49 L19 N31'55'3516 91.73 V) 2 z L6 N96'14'49"W 63-0 L20 1d0'32'43"E 125.29 Ku s L7 NBS'50'0419 85.57 I "6cc O La N60'59'54"W 36.69 t p ri a7 1-9 N70'27'4114 25.64 �1 C] N v L10 589'15'00'14 20.04 W 4 L1 1 N9B'S3'39"1V 1 89.53 >_ f L12 554"o4'o39A' 27-94 ~ L13 W52'21"E 16.96 C L14 N75'S1'12"E 48.41 i y O !Z +r � O CURVE TABLE DATE- DECEMBER 2020 CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA CNDRD BRG CHORD alaaEcr, M.14 01 45.00' 30.59' 38'56'33- N7932'13'E 30.00' SHEET: C2 115.U0' 53.14' 2E26'39- Nl8'4l'l3"W 52.67' 2 OF 2 !on ENGINEERS.SURYE1'W"NRERS 9233 WEST STATE STREET 09I541DAM 83714 PHONE12061639-CIM FA%I2m1 fiasco Page 32 Page 174 Item#7. km E N G I N E E R I N G December 17,2020 Project N.D.18-140 Exhibit A Legal Description for Rezurm t!]C-G Prescott Ridge Subdivision A parcel of land situated in a portion of Northwest 1/4 and a portion of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 7$,Tow nshlp 4 North, Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an aluminum Cap marking the Northwest corner said Section 28, which bears N89'27'17"W a distance of 2,609.40;eet frorrh an aluminum cap marking the North 1/4 cormrof said Sertlon 2$, thence following the northerly [ine of the Northwest 1{4 of said Section 28, M'22'17"E a distance of 1,484.66 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence following Bald northerly line,5S9'27'17"E a distance of 1.124.74 Feet to said aluminum Cap making the North 1/4 earner; Thence leaving said northerly line and following the easterly line of said Northwest 1/4,S00'43'55"W a distance of 586.55 feet to a 1/2-Inch rebar, Thence leaving said easterly line,5S9'?5'31"E a distance of 17.44 feet to a point; Thence SOT34'294W a distance-oF397,44 Feet to a point; Thence N89`25'31"W a dicta nce of 826_54 feet to a po int; Thence Np0°32'13"E a distance of 837.62 feet to a 112-inch reWr, Thence 569'18'13"W a distance Of 270-56 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; Thence N31`55'3YW a distance of 81.73 feet to a pains;; Thence53-14 feet along the arc of a cirrular curve tDthe right,said Curve havl rig a radlusof 115.DO feed, a delta angle of 26'28'39",a chord bearing of N18'41'13"W and a chord dlstanee of 52.67 feet to a 5/9- inch rebar; Thence N00'3243"E a distance of 125.29 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. So Id parce l contains a tota l of 19.952 acres,more or less- Attached hereto is Exhibit Band by this reference is hereby made a part of. Cxk a' 1 46 s3 92"Vftpt5tote5k W r Balse,Idaha M1714 . 208.ON9.6939 * kmcnellp-cam Page 33 Page 175 Item#7. D d EV t � 3 ❑ POINT OF BD'IHHING W.Chin hd den B (Hwy 20126) ALUMINUM CAP WN 1/4 CORNER BASIS OF BEARING �S1;CT10N 28 20 21 _ _ S99'27'17"E 20o9.4o' Q 29 28 48@"27'WE 1464.66' 3424.74' � G4 NOG 32'43 LA"f 0 7 ❑ 125.2E1' a,, v N31'55'351V Q 06 01.73' u°Vi Z3 4 CC a Rezone Area: 19.$5±AC. -I-, n, 50428211202,R6991222101,R6991222210(Portron), 0 ,n 50428220950{Pdrtiany,S0428120640{portion} o a IT— &5042813120a(Porti x L z � Current Zoning:RUT W v N Proposed Zoning:C•G 4 d � o � a M S8725'31'E 41 17.44' I DATE: DECE>a(�ER T010 Z f+ CURVE TABLE PNOIFCT; 18300 CURVE 1 RAIDIUS LENGTH DELTA CH RID RRG CHORE) SHEET: 1 OF 1 Cl 115.00' 53A4' 21m-39- NIB-41.13-W 52.87' 'v i � H89'25'31"1V 828.54' F�yy EEYY y� ENfiBYEEA3.SIlINEY0R5.PGNINEAS 0 100 200 4Q0 1 9233WE5T5TATE5T0EET 0mc OAH0 83714 PHONE 1M)E396939 SCALE: 1'=200° FAX W81B39593Q Page 34 Page 176 Item#7. km E N G I N E E R I N G April 7,2020 Project No.18-140 Exhibit A Legal Description for Rezone to R-8 Prescott Ridge Subdivision A parcel of land situated in a portion of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 and a portion of the West 1/2 of Section 28,Township 4 North, Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows. Commencing at an aluminum cap narking the Northwest corner said Section 28, which (sears N89'27'17"W a distance of 2,609.40 feet from an aluminum cap marking the North 1/4 corner of said Section 28, thence following the northerly line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 28, S89'27'17"E a distance of 2,609.40 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence following the northerly line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 28,S89°2525"E a distance of 60.00 feet to a point; Thence leaving said northerly line,S00'43'55"W a distance of 658.89 feet to a point; Thence S89'24'23"E a distance of 1,248.58 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar on the easterly line of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 29; Thence fallowing said easterly line,S00'36'13"W a distance of 1,615.76 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence leaving said easterly line, N77`58'17"W a distance of 1,338.12 feet to a 5/8-inch rehar an the easterly line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 28; Thence following said easterly line, SO743'55"W a distance of 625.95 feet to 2-inch pipe marking the Center 1/4 of said Section 28; Thence leaving said easterly line,S00'43'51"W a distance of 24.35 feet to a 5/8-inch rehar; Thence S53"05'53"W a distance of 16.53 feet to a 5/8-inch rehar; Thence N78"07'38"W a distance of 19.68 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence S89"18'46"W a distance of 45.49 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence N86'14'49"W a distance of 63.62 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence N88'50'04"W a distance of 85.57 feet to a 5/8-inch rehar; Thence N80'59'54"W a distance of 36.69 feet to a 5/8-inch rehar; Thence N70'27'41"W a distance of 25.64 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence S89'15'00"W a distance of 20.04 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence N86'53'39"W a distance of 189.53 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence S64'04'03"W a distance of 27.64 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar; Thence N89'14'25"W a distance of 799.53 feet to a point; Thence N00°52'21"E a distance of 16.96 feet to a point being the Center West 1/16 corner of said Section 28; Thence following the southerly line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 28, N89'21'12"W a distance of 686.03 feet to a point; Thence leaving said southerly line,ND1'00'37"E a distance of 400.00 feet to a point; Thence N89'21'12"W a distance of 625.00 feet to a point on the westerly line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 28; Thence following said westerly line,ND1"00'37"E a distance of 690.74 feet to a point; 9233 West State Street • Boise,Idaho 83714 • 20-8.639,6939 • kmenglip.com Page 35 Page 177 Item#7. Thence leaving said westerly line,S71"33'16"E a distance of 483.50 feet to a point; Thence S78'08'16"E a distance of 589.77 feet to a point; Thence 545"56'01"E a distance of 299.29 feet to a point; Thence N75'51'12"E a distance of 48.41 feet to a paint; Thence NOO°52'17"E a distance of 21598 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; Thence N75°32'13"E a distance of 272AO feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; Thence 30.59 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 45.00 feet, a delta angle of 38"56'33",a chord bearing of N75'32'13"E and a chord distance of 30.00 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; Thence N75'32'13"E a distance of 219.13 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar.- Thence NOO'32'13"E a distance of 659.67 feet to a point; Thence 589`25'31"E a distance of 279.95 feet to a point; Thence SOW34'29"W a distance of 420.05 feet to a point; Thence 589'25'31"E a distance of 27160 feet to a point; Thence.82.73 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 150.00 feet, a delta angle of 31°3b'09",a chord bearing of S73"37'27"E and a chard distance of 81.69 feet to a point; Thence S57'49'22"E a distance of 138.82 feet to a point; Thence 275.78 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 500.00 feet, a delta angle of 31`36'09",a chord bearing of N16'22'33"E and a chord distance of 272.30 feet to a point; Thence NOD"34'29"E a distance of 233.13 feet to a point; Thence 589'25*31"E a distance of496.43 feet to a point; Thence ND4°36'19"E a distance of 294.85 feet to a point; Thence 1\189°24'23"W a distance of 496.59 feet to a point; Thence NOO°34'29"E a distance of 122.33 feet to a point; Thence N89°25'31"W a distance of 17.44 feet to a point on the easterly Me of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 28; Thence following said easterly line, NOO'43'55"E a distance of 586.55 Beet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 99.532 acres, more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is hereby made a part of. - 1 ` I S T �- m 124 C OF % B Ilk Client Project Name PAGE 2 Page 36 Page 178 Item#7. POINT OF BEGINNING O ALUMINUM CAP 0 — N i/4 CORNER i SECTION 28 20 21 8A515 OF BEARING W,Chinden Blvd{Hwy 20/26) CL — —SB9'27'17"E 2609.40' L1 m p POINT OF COMMENCEMENT — — C' m Q ALUMINUM CAP 00 Q S00'43'55"W 1 SE14W CORNER 658.89' V1 N SECTION 28 u� ED �O °�' s L24 S89'24'23"E 124B.58' N V O Ln z z 1 L23 L22 S89'25'31"E ,h ro4 279.95' I 1 � p C S89'25'31"E a — .� 496.43' *—' a-' u 0 250 500 1000 0; m 2 -x VI O el w O m 61 N M SCALE: 1"=500' �, $ LIB w a O N 7y O N Z S77.33 B" Z C2 o a} 4a ' e Rezone Area:99.53±AC. "' t v so s7608'1s 01 50428233640,R6991222210(Portion),50428120950(Portion), Enc° V 589.77' Ctrs C1 SO428131315&SO428131200(Portion) a o A �2 Current Zoning:RUT `O S4611,56'01"E Proposed Zoning:R-8 DATE: APRIL 2020 299.29' �}k PROJECT. 18-140 N89'21'12"W N77-5817.W 133 SHEET: 625.00' w In tn 8.12' 1 OF Z b M O In In N a o p CENTER-WEST 1/16 CORNER o o OF SECTION 28 2" PIPE o g — CENTER OF SECTION 28 ` z N89'21'12"W 686.03' BRASS CAP L13 N89'14'25"W 789.53' _ — Ion W 1/4 CORNER ' SECTION 2S Jf�Tr L10 �q LS ENGINEERS.SURVEYORS.PLANNERS 9233 WEST STATE STREET 8015E,IDANC 83714 \_L12L71 L7 Lfi 1-2 PHCNE(209)639-6939 L3 FAx{206)639-6930 Page 37 Page 179 Item#7. o CL LINE TABLE LINE TABLE 0 f0 u LINE BEARING DISTANCE UNE BEARING DISTANCE C o L1 589'25'25"E 60.00 L15 NO'52'17"E 215.98 CO Q� � L2 S0'43'51"W 24.35 Lib N7532'13'E 272.40 m L3 S53'05'53W 16.53 L17 N75'32'13% 219.13 �0 f0 r L4 N7B'07'38"W 19.68 LIB 589'25'31"E 275.80 iz -Q cr L5 S89'18'4B W 45.49 L19 S57'49'22'E 138.82 O L/1 Z Z L6 N86'14'49"W 83.62 L20 NO'34'29"E 233.13 0J (D N UD o0 L7 NBW50'04'W 55.57 L21 NO'35'19'E 294.95 o ry LB N80'S9'54"W 38.69 L22 NB9'24'23'W 496.59 m O } +� u L9 N70'27'41"W 25.64 L23 NO'34'29'E 122.33 0 N L10 S89.15'00'W 20.04 L24 N59'25'31'W 17.44 L Ln o X L11 N86'53'39'W 189.53 L25 NO'43'55"E 556.55 LLI a N L Y \ L12 56404'03"W 27.64 � N C L13 140'S2'21"E 16.96 O L14 NIU51-12-E 48.41 r m O C a + Q o CURVE TABLE DA1E: APRIL2M CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA CHORDBRG CHORD ➢ROIECIC: �euD Cl 45.00' 30.59' 3856'33' N75'3243'E 30.00 SHEET: C2 150.00' 62.73' 31'36'09' S73'3727'E 81.59 Z OF 2 C3 500.00' 275.78' 31'36'09" Ni6'22'33'E 272.30' I= ENGINEERS.SURVEVORS.PIANNM 9233 WESTSTATESTREET MISE,IDAH083114 FAX(2DR rv2WN 6 9 P I 39-69309 Page 38 Page 180 Item#7. km E N G I N E E R I N G April 7,2020 Project No.18-140 Exhibit A Legal Description for Rezone to R-15 Prescott Ridge Subdivision A parcel of land situated in a portion cf Northwest 1/4 and a portion of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 28,Township 4 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an aluminum cap marking the Northwest corner said Section 28, which bears N89"27'17"W a distance of 2,609.40 feet from an aluminum cap marking the North 114 corner of said Section 28, thence following the northerly line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 28, S89°27'17"E a distance of 2,078.14 feet to a point; Thence leaving said northerly line,500°43'55"W a distance of 983.71 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence S89"25'31"E a distance of 546.59 feet to a point; Thence N00'34'29"E a distance of 275.11 feet to a point; Thence S89'24'23"E a distance of 496.59 feet to a point; Thence 500436'19"W a distance of 294.85 feet to a point; Thence N89°25'31"W a distance of 496.43 feet to a point; Thence 500`34'29"W a distance of 233.13 feet to a point; Thence.275.78 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 500.00 feet, a delta angle of 31'36'09",a chord bearing of 516°22'33"W and a chord distance of 272.30 feet to a point; Thence N57°49'22"W a distance of 138.82 feet to a point; Thence 82.73 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 150_OD feet,a delta angle of 319V)9",a chord bearing of N73°37'27"W and a chord distance of 81.69 feet to a point; Thence N89'25'31"W a distance of 275.60 feet to a point; Thence N00'34'29"E a distance of 420.05 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, Said parcel contains a total of 8.822 acres,more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit 3 and by this reference is hereby made a part of. 4 � 12459 g OF Z. 9233 West State street Boise,Idaho 83714 * 208.639.6939 kmengllp.com Page 39 Page 181 Item#7. m a ALUMINUM CAP T r N 1/4 CORNER m + BASIS OF BEARING W.Chinden Blvd(Hwy 20/26) 1 SECTION 25 =3 20 21 _ S69-27'17"E 2609.40' / O 0 29 26 2078.14' — — — — — C a -a ,j _d o ¢ � a � POINT OF COMMENCEMENT ALUMINUM CAP �O : c NW CORNER I — — SECTION 2B w 0) O m i S89'24'23'E 496.59' — — — r4 '^ d GC `pcc O M e rn m y Z V 4� o Ln n I M > o I,//r POINT OF BEGINNING N r' � z X N S89'25'31"E 546.59' v Y L Rezone Area: 8.82±AC. i N89'25'31 W 496.43' p O c Z o R6991222210(Portion)& �, M Y o 0 50428120950(Portion) M Current Zoning:RUT a ¢ w Proposed Zoning:R-15 � I I DATE: APRIL 2020 N PROJECTS 18-140 M d I SHEET: Z I 1OF1 U N69'25'31'1N 275.60' C2 CURVETABLF N57'49'22"W 0 100 200 400 lam CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA CHORD BRG CHORD 138'82 C1 5ao.00' 275.78' 31'36'09" S1622'33W 272,30' I SCALE: 1"=200' ENGINEERS.SURVEYORS.PLANNERS sTATr STREET C2 150.00' 82.73' 31'36'09' N7337'27W 81.69' 9z33wes'DAHO83714 BOiSE,IOAH083714 PHONE(208)53M939 FAX(203)53M930 Page 40 Page 182 Item#7. C. Preliminary Plat(date: 912812020 10,121 20 i i 20,/ 12/22/20),Phasing Plan u.Lot r .,, ou4 Exhibit- REVISED _ Y1GRm FNP:iLL PRESCOTT PRELIMINARY PLAT SHOWING Z — —~—� I w.allorN o<va A PARCEL OF LAND 5I7UA7EP INAPpRT19N OF THE NpRTHEAST 114 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 O F S ECTI O N 28,TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 WESi,MSL MLRI DIAN,ADA COUNTY.IDAHO f 1 K """•„' � 'ram ._�__ I OPEN SPATE LOTAREM ttnr am T".w :aCi 63 wh 08 _ _- i:':g:a.. -....,...... a .❑ tie: m a�� � �..�- .. ,. ,.m.,��, ;5;;®® B a 1 m @ m�o ® } ® ai ® 3I::EI3!r;,�;E:F?' m � B v B a `` ...�� � •., ::"AI 7.N SPA:: 6 2:: _"6:� 1L ® @ ® •• I PRESCCFTE RIOGESUBDIVIMON MERIDIAN,IDARO all @ 9 $F7 9 ®S;•.. a B E:1 0 i ® @ @ ®@ O C7 Oi Tj '`S ,km _r�in.r�zw,n �• PPLO LL Page 41 Page 183 Item#7. r .r4 o. (r �J•irY�,y .'& ^O O� sly b �': ® � �'�� f �� � � ..,© .r 1 �2 LAVdUT PLAN l', .:.�L I�a' •���n .4--I.'�� AHE5CUUMDUE 5U9oN15 IbAHD I ` 1 bt•TMfuN MATCH LINE 2.1 SHEET PP2.2 ® 1 \ - Ymil.-:�. V yII k T 1 ® ® BESCD7 FIDGE SUBDIV151py p A ® d ® _ O ➢ Q E7 a O �' m _ D MERIDIAN,ICAHO LAYOUT PLAN r --1 ...PP2.3 .. Page 42 Page 184 Item#7. _---.... — 0 . . •, ,, ., p , . ... 5-�--MATC�LfN��S�E3NEET PP2.3. ® .. 1 .� ` ��� �� -•. r S® ------------------ ® k, . . :•: : '� o e n.•.••.• MATCH LINE•SEE SHEETPP2.1— �,:��;�;;;_;;;�;_;_; , � �.+ T LAY�VT PLRN rti.•.•..-..-. � ' - - - - 1 APcH ♦ n -q ... m FF'PiiF�''�'`� e`�`s•.f}�$ �^-x« -✓� p .■I �4 � o - d;'v4'G". AA2~�.. N�9.i//L. ��le- A"'•�'�°i�..�.ti/ �r arm w.'r" '•� BESWT F RIDGE SIIDDIVISI^ �rnnu . ='I_ w PP2.2-^ 1 1 ml f� zl 1 x al f� �1 It �1 Ig NI IN L44 � i RI -------------- MATCH LINE-SEE SHEET PP2.4 _ ---, — ----1 RESCOTT MIDGE SUBDIVISION� f MEND IMI,ID4HO f ® jp ' 5 m - E. i t ii MATCH LINE•SEE SHEET PPL2 4c PP3.3 g Page 43 Page 185 Item#7. -----f--.--------.-f��- 1 , Ir r r r r i ' I ' I a' F ' I I ' I r � r ' I [t 1 i - Page 44 Page 186 PHASE BUILDABLE E, LC TS 77-f 65 T2 44 3 41 4 43 z 5 41 Q 6 1 37 2:2 PHASE 1 7 39 a 46 z 9 14 f z :E TOTAL UUILL)AULE 370 x LOTS 'PHA. E. PHASE......... u i pIASF LLJ7 km IN 0 1 N I I I I G EL ITIASE 3 �77771777114LLLLQ� Plan Scale-1' 300' Page 45 Item#7. D. Landscape Plan(date: 4�7tivrrvrwzv i 0/9/2 20 11 n n/2n 12/22/20)—REVISED 1• C � unm •.w 1 N •w' �iT�'' � - . w M•yA I� u - •*P: —n •_�L { MGA •r 'W'OIL I PEN 5Pp{C i EES —J R$Md � h � ,. ISY�E7, t11E[[wILUL4fi[xi5 f1TREV311f�• `x � '� xa, • :� �� tt1i AL SIRE FT TR[FS 1 ....�5 � .i -il,Y"y�'A�^� I "1r� - �• '�' � iL �•u rpm w JCO -- 1 • .':I s f ImrrrATIPN KAYIILEMWTS " To � mrumnne pvneo � L Ih+A MSAIOMN,IDAHO I . - r u�owlnccna lie+ s -- I i� .,- mrr•cR�xro�uio• awl• Wp•e+li WlX•IYn_ - LANdS[APE SITE PLAN —�� vvL1A Page 46 Page 188 Item#7. twl'+ri -- - ---•�.... i � �ii17Yriz4rs • i ' I �■ I 1 1 { I 7 � Ir L � • � 'Fr w,�-e � � ._=pia=_____ !-• I �. ��aRR-T� � TF•IwE ! i �—� { +_�~ •� f� -�Sti ` � - a ��a• sat •rf le � 1'*14MI4-* IIFS 1 Ak T • • F��Y wllt■ e•{l ti1Y1lia ��' �•• ", —_ Cl m � i y 1+ li' i • I; ,1 t 4_ i -- ■ I+ulr Page 47 Page 189 Item#7. _ n+ -----_-+. --- ------------------ _ ' i Ir �� ia4� 1 � • ��1 ,,r :I : i sa� 1 ylh � • 4J F` * it • `�} f + I � ` + �1 'ram �. + � • - - --• - I i ti�ti r� rr • • f --_.aui-i i-.Fa �• ' r' ' a 1 �' • .-a—a a�a-ai�-o • ` F + r � as a •1r��.. u: • terra arr�--_ I 1 LR�tiW L---------- -------------------------- J. �a 1 � 1' a� Page 48 Page 190 Item#7. Ftl...tl 1 W.sarr• ----��__ f — _ 1 1 1 • � 9 Page 49 Page 191 Item#7. E. Qualified Open Space Exhibit& Site Amenities(dated: °"6"^ '0/9/2#"' 12/22/20)—REVISED PRESCOTT RIDGE SUBDIVISION F E MNANYP TOPENSPACEOATA °�"�'�`°" OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT a a a J • "°" a R ®B • Ilr o a a B i ® aBB® !� ®1 • B TO MA ENWACE ® uva� •• B®� � ® • • � •B® 4 ®® � i_fro-�..-wu w+�m vu awx a Ba®® ••a e n a Y I.�. ® a• ® e a s B e I a e I ® ®m m a � ®w••®e•w a n w B e B® ® mp a� a -- _ i —I I—��`� i B ® °®oar "a ®uaw w ® e ® e• a ® B • RESCOTT RIDGE SUBDIVISION • •••B B •••B a ® ® m A'®®�d • MERIDIAN,IDAHD ut OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT Page 50 Page 192 Item#7. AMEWHES v � ' A-POOL ANO CLU HOUSE TI- Yll=*+rU 136USf BU I LOING ..----- - ,� 54'83LPPOOL _ 17 PARKING SPACES r Ll B-L-ARGETOT lOT 4 - C-SMALL'TOT LOT D DOGPARYJPOCKET PART( PRESCOT'I- E-OPEN SPACE F•MEW RIDGE G-PROPERTY MANAGEMENT MERIDIAN,IDAHO -. E OFFICE.ENCLOSED BIKE STORAGE,CENTRAL ,�Iy F MAI=X CW5TER,AND „ti B I �I� -- ILL DIRECTORY MAP .....//1 A SCHEMATIC CLUBHOUSE — -j I' g LARGETOTLOT t T' SMALL TOT LOT pOG PARKIPOCKET PARK Page 51 Page 193 Item#7. F. Parking Plan(dated:4/8/20 10/21/2020)—REVISED -- • ��. _ a� ----��- litilli I S 1 I P4XIWG IN FROM}W I IVHL.:IS I I �- a 6 4 g� 4 �., L 111 •.•.•.•.•.:•:.... _ W J �- 7 1ttt 3 8 RR- 7 - -- ny I a OM HOMES PAFmING I ¢ 9 ,3 9 - � 3 � ��•�� lti�� - _ 6 E 5 km 3 5 6 5 3 3 3 e a -— F M13ut�tElN 3 16 I 10 � e PARKING t MIT szacieoFunvuWnc Page 52 Page 194 Item#7. G. Conceptual Building Elevations/Perspectives-REVISED SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ` I RIDGE MEY CIA•NRHU { TOWNHOMES FOUR-PLEX FLATS Nor- jp Film AWO i S Page 53 Page 195 Item#7. 1 + Three-story Hospital Watercolor Rendering _ Mimi MERIDIAN HOSPITAL TEST FIT H ;•� MERIDIAH,IDAHO W.M2' Healthcare" Page 54 Page 196 Item#7. H. Parcel Status Exhibit 10*1 IandproDATA Parcel Status Exhibit R6991222101 -Wheaton Legal parcel as a platted lot SO428211102- Roark within Peregrine Heights Legal parcel per e-mail Subdivision and e-mail from from Brent Danielson Brent Danielson dated e dated 8.26.19. 8.26.19• wy 20 W Chinden Blvd r SO428120640- Providence Illegal parcel,but will become ACHD z right-of-way per Christy Little e-mail dated 11.6.19. R6991222210- Roark Legal parcel as a platted SO428131200-School lot within Peregrine Illegal parcel,but included Heights Subdivision. with this application to S0428233640- Hon rectify illegal status. Legal parcel per e-mail from Brent Danielson dated 9.5.19. ❑ 0 SO428120950&SO428131315- Kuenzli House parcel is legal. �i Remainder is illegal,but will be rectified SO428233620-Thomson qh by this application. Legal parcel per e-mail from Brent Danielson q3°39'13.74"dated 9.5.19. N 115°27'15.48"W — Map cats 02019 Aug 25,2019-IandproDATA.com The materials available at this website are for informational Scale:1 inch approx 600 feet purposes only and do not constitute a legal document. Page 55 Page 197 Item#7. IX. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION commercial,The conceptual development plan for the C G zoned portion of the site, shall be- Fevised and submitted to the City Cler-k at least 4 0 days p4or to the City Couneil hearing FeReet eonfor-manee with the following guidelines in the COMPFehensive Plan for-Mixed Use • The buildings in the commercial C G zoned portion of the deVelopment shall be arran ed to er-eate some form of >usable RFea, parks,the mixed use guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan (pg.3 43)-. not limited to plazas, outdoof gathering areas, open space, > site; —and—seho-olls shall be provided in the Mixed Use designated portion of the outdoor seating areas-at annex-ation area does not satisfy this mquiventent as it is notpar4 of the AKmed U-se designate • Development of the Mixed Use designated area shall be eentered around spaees that are well designed publie and quasi pubfie eenteFs of aetivity. Spaees should be netivated and ineor-porate permanent design elements and amenities that fosteF a wide variety o interests ranging&om leisure to play. These areas should be thoughtfully integrated in • The 4 story medieal office building proposed at the southeast eorner of the eommere development shall be shifted to the HOFth tO fFont on the main entry dFive aisle off N. Rustie Oak Way as a be�fte-r t-f-a-u-sition to the residenees to the south. • A eofflMeFeial land use type shall be ineluded on the plan in the MU R designated a retail, restaurants, 1. A Development Agreement(DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. At the Applicant's request,three(3) separate DA's shall be required for each component of the project—one for the R-8 and R-15 zoned residential portions of the development, one for the medical campus and another for the school district's parcel. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, Development Agreements shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s)at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer(s). Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicants to the Planning Division for each DA prior to commencement of the DA's. The DA's shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA's shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. R-8 and R-15 zoned portions of the development: 1. Future development of the R-8 and R-15 zoned portions of the site shall be generally consistent with the master plan,preliminary plat,phasing plan, landscape plan, qualified open space & site amenity exhibit, and conceptual building elevations included in Section VI11 and the provisions contained herein. Page 56 Page 198 Item#7. 2. Administrative design review shall be required for all single-family attached, townhome and multi-family structures. Compliance with the design standards for such listed in the Architectural Standards Manual is required. 3. The rear and/or side of structures on Lots 2-6,Block 4; Lots 2-7,Block 1; Lots 8 and 9- 15,Block 9; Lot 16,Block 7; Lot 2,Block 12; Lots 2-14,Block 10;Lots 2-16 and 29, Block 14; Lot 68, 70, 81-83, and 77-78,Block 12; and Lots 43 4 4, 75 42,45 and-79 67, Block 8 that face collector streets(i.e.N.McDermott Rd.,N. Rustic Oak Way and W. Ramblin St.), shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding, porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. 4. A conditional use permit shall be obtained for a multi-family development in the R-15 zoning district as set forth in UDC Table 11-2A-2. The use is subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27: Multi-Family Development. 5. One management company shall handle the leasing and maintenance of the entire multi- family development to ensure better overall consistent management of the development. 6. An electronic gate that is approved by the Fire Department shall be provided for access to Serenity Ln. from the south. 7. Noise abatement for the future SH-16 extension shall be provided in the form of a berm or a berm and wall combination parallel to N. McDermott Rd. constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3H-4D. b. Medical campus/hospital: 1. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the master plan,preliminary plat,phasing plan, landscape plan and conceptual building elevation included in Section VIII and the provisions contained herein. 2. Future development shall comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and in the Architectural Standards Manual. 3. Noise abatement shall be provided in the form of a berm or a berm and wall combination parallel to W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3H-413. 4. A minimum 30-foot wide buffer with an 8-foot tall CMU wall shall be provided along the western and southern boundaries of the site adjacent to residential uses as proposed on the landscape plan in Section VIII.D. Dense landscaping consisting of a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs, lawn or other vegetative ground cover that results in a barrier that allows trees to touch at maturity is required per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-9C. The block wall shall be decorative and have texture and a color complimentary to adjacent residential structures—plain CMU block is not allowed. 5. A frontage road parallel to W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 shall be constructed as depicted on the conceptual development plan in Section VIII.A in accord with UDC 11-3H- 4B.3e. 6. The hospital building shall be restricted to 3-stories in height as proposed. Page 57 Page 199 Item#7. 7. The entire first floor of the medical office building shall consist of retail and restaurant uses as proposed to provide a mix of uses as desired in the Mixed-Use designated area in accord with the Comprehensive Plan. 8. The final design of the site shall be consistent with the general Mixed Use and Mixed Use—Regional guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan(see pgs. 3-13 thru 3-15 and 3-18 thru 3-19). 9. The buffer along the west boundary of the site shall incorporate a 2-foot tall berm with an 8-foot tall wall on top of the berm to assist in blocking the noise from the commercial development if approved by the Peregrine Heights Homeowner's Association(HOA). If not approved by the HOA,the landscaping and wall shall be installed as depicted on the conceptual development plan. 10. City Council deemed access for the emergency room via Rustic Oak,a collector street. meets the intent of the requirement in UDC 11-4-3-22A for Hospitals providing emergency care to have direct access on an arterial street. 11. The hospital shall not pursue beingdesignated as a trauma center per direction of City Council. c. School Site: 1. The subject property shall develop with an education institution; any other uses shall require modification of this agreement. 2. A conditional use permit shall be obtained for an education institution in the R-8 zoning district as set forth in UDC Table 11-2A-2. The use is subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-14: Education Institution. 3. Future development shall comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and in the Architectural Standards Manual is required. 2. The final plat(s) submitted for this development shall incorporate the following changes: a. Include a note that prohibits direct lot access via W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 unless otherwise approved by the City and the Idaho Transportation Department. . c. Depict cross-access/ingress-egress easements to adjacent MU-R designated properties to the west(Parcels#R6991221700 &R6991221600)and east(Parcel#R6991222101)in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A.2. Page 58 Page 200 Item#7. e. Depict the easement(s)for the West Tap sub-lateral; if the easement(s)is greater than 10- feet in width, it should be placed in a common lot that is a minimum of 20-feet in width and outside of a fenced area,unless modified by City Council as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6E. fl. Re design the townhaffie pei4ien of the development(i.e. Lots 16 79, Bleek 8)with P41 multi family dei,elopment(i.e. one stmetufe on one pr-epet4y with 3 of:more dwellifig tiflits) with townheme style tmits might be a development option for-this afea. A Fevised eoneept plan shall be presented P40F tO or-at the Commission hearing for review and a revised plat refleeting this ehange shall be submitted at least 10 days prior to the City Cou hearing.if private stFeets are PFOPosed with a townhome development, a mew or-g ffiVate StFeets should beffevided in aeeord with UDC 1= 3F 1.Also,provide updated density ealeuladoftsv g. Lots 70-83,Block 12 in the multi-family portion of the development shall be revised to depict parking and access driveways on a common lot with an ingress-egress/parking easement for each buildable lot. A Fe-Ased plat shall be submitted at least 10 days p .Done h. Extend W. Smokejumper St. as a stub street to the out-parcel(Parcel#S0428233620) at the southwest corner of the site. 3. The landscape plan submitted with the final plat application shall be revised as follows: a. Depict a detail/cross-section of the berm or berm and wall combination required as noise abatement within the street buffer along W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 and N. McDermott Rd.; also address how the wall will be constructed to avoid a monotonous wall,that demonstrates compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3H-4D. b. Remove Lot 1,Bleek 15 as it's AC14D right of way and eaflaot be platted as a e0faffien . c. Depict a detached sidewalk/pathway(as applicable) along all collector streets(i.e.N. McDermott Rd.,N. Rustic Oak Way and W. Ramblin St.) and W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 in accord with UDC 11-3A-17.A detached 10 foot wide multi-use pathway is required within the street buffers along N. McDermott Rd., W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26, the east side off. Rustic Oak Way and W. Ramblin St. d. Landscaping shall be depicted on either side of all pathways as set forth in UDC 11-3B- 12C. e. If existing trees are proposed to be removed from the site,the Applicant shall coordinate with Matt Perkins,the City Arborist,to determine mitigation requirements per the standards listed in UDC 11-313-1OC.5. Mitigation information shall be included on the plan. If existing trees are proposed to be retained on site,they shall be depicted on the plan. f. A calculations table shall be included on the plan that demonstrates compliance with the landscape standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3E(common open space), 11-313-12C (pathways), 11-3A-17(parkways) and 11-3B-7C(street buffers); calculations should include the linear feet of pathways,parkways and street buffers and square footage of common open space as applicable, along with the required vs.provided number of trees. g. Revise the fencing type around the perimeter of Lot 1,Block 2 and Lot 37,Block 12 to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7A.7 to provide more visibility of the common areas in accord with CPTED design strategies. h. Include a detail of the amenities proposed with each phase of development. Page 59 Page 201 Item#7. i. The CMU wall proposed along the south and west boundaries of the commercial portion of the development shall have texture and a color complimentary to adjacent residential structures—plain CMU block is not allowed; revise the detail(i.e.reference photo) accordingly. development in Bleek 9 in aeeer-d with the st�a�-Fds listed i UDG 11 30 3E. k. If a dog park is proposed on Lot 1, Block 2, demonstrate compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3C.Ih. 1. Depict a small tot lot on Lot 12,Block 6 rather than a large tot lot, consistent with that shown on the site amenities plan. m. Modify the landscape plan consistent with changes required to the plat above under condition IX.A.2 above. 4. Future development shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-6, 11-2A-7 and 11-213-3 for the R-8,R-15 and C-G zoning districts respectively. 5. Off-street parking is required to be provided for residential uses in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 and for commercial uses in accord with the standards listed in 1I- 3C-6B;bicycle parking is required in commercial districts as set forth in UDC 11-3C-6G per the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-5C. ehanges noted above in eondition#A.2f and that ffovides fOF adequate guest parking serve this POF00H of the developmen-G. 6. An exhibit shall be submitted with the final plat application(s)that depicts the setbacks,fencing, building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via common driveways; if a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street,the driveway shall be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D. 7. Address signage shall be provided at the public street for homes accessed via common driveways for emergency wayfinding purposes. 8. Common driveways shall be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. A perpetual ingress/egress easement shall be filed with the Ada County Recorder for the common driveways,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. This information may be included in a note on the face of the plat rather than in a separate easement. plat in the townheme pei4ien of the developmefft in Bleek 8 are not approved. , 10. All existing structures shall be removed from the site prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer for the phase in which they are located. 11. Pathways shall be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8. 12. A 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division for the 10-foot wide multi-use pathways proposed within the site as required by the Park's Department, prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer for the phase in which they are located. Page 60 Page 202 Item#7. 13. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted and approved prior to submittal of any building permit applications for the clubhouse and swimming pool facility, single-family attached,townhome, multi-family and commercial structures.All structures except for single-family detached structures are required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1.1 This proposed development is not currently serviceable by the Meridian City water and sanitary sewer systems. Mainlines designed to service this development are within The Oaks North Subdivision to the south.Until utilities are available to the south boundary of the proposed development,the City of Meridian will not accept an application for final plat. 1.1.2 Sewer mainline/manholes are not allowed in common driveways or under sidewalks. Run service lines down common drive but make sure required separation can be met. 1.1.3 The planned sewer trunk line will enter this property at N. Rustic Oak Way. 1.1.4 The sewer line in N. Rustic Oak Way shall be 10-inch all the way to Chinden Blvd. 1.1.5 The applicant shall be required to pay the Oaks Lift Station and Pressure Sewer Reimbursement Fees in the amount of$265.25 per equivalent residential unit(ERU). The reimbursement fees for the entire residential portion of this subdivision shall be paid prior to city signatures on the first final plat. 1.1.6 The applicant shall be required to pay the Oaks Lift Station Pump Upgrades Reimbursement Fees in the amount of$185.43 per equivalent residential unit(ERU). The reimbursement fees for the entire residential portion of this subdivision shall be paid prior to city signatures on the first final plat. 1.1.7 As noted in the Geotechnical Evaluation Report prepared by GeoTek Inc., all artificial fill materials on site must be removed. 1.1.8 New 12-inch water main will need to be installed in parts of W Sturgill Peak St,N Jumpspot Ave,W Parachute Dr,N Streamer Way,W Smokejumper St and N Rustic Oak Way. 1.1.9 Construct water main in N Streamer Way between W.Parachute Drive and W. Fireline Drive. 1.1.10 Water connections to the north need to be facilitated either by extension of a mainline or and easement in common area Lot 19,Block 1, or off the end of the cul-de-sac to the property line. This is dependent on how road connections to the north are designed and developed in the future. 1.1.11 Remove the water main proposed in N Serenity Avenue. At the intersection of N Serenity Ave and W Tanker Dr,Install a tee at the branch off point with an isolation valve directly attached to it and then cap off the outlet side of the valve. This allows the tap to be installed and pressure tested so if the existing County Subdivision wants to connect in the future they can easily do so. 1.1.12 Water& sewer need to flip locations in N Backfire Way. Currently these lines are not in the proper corridor. Water should be located on the east side of the road&sewer on the west. Page 61 Page 203 Item#7. 1.1.13 Eliminate stub/dead-end water main at each corner of the townhome section off of W Wildfire Dr of the development. Services are only allowed in these areas just like common drives. 1.1.14 A water connection to the east(near N Static Line Ave and/or townhome section off of N Rustic Oak Way)needs to be enabled by either an extension of water mains to the property line or an easement. This is dependent on road connections to the east. 1.1.15 Water modeling was completed both as an entire development and at each phase per the phasing plan included in this record. This development was modeled with the 12"mains through the subdivision as required above, and the rest of the mains were modeled as 8". Per this plan there are no pressure issues,but each phase will need to be modeled at Final Plat to verify there aren't any pressure issues. 1.1.16 The geotechnical investigative report prepared by SITE Consulting,LLC indicates some very specific construction considerations. The applicant shall be responsible for the strict adherence of these recommendations to help ensure that groundwater does not become a problem within crawlspaces of homes. 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2"x I I"map with bearings and distances(marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year- round source of water(MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. Page 62 Page 204 Item#7. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals,or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B.Whitney at(208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer,an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. Page 63 Page 205 Item#7. 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridianciN.orgz WebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=188367&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiU D. POLICE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=188188&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianCity E. PARK'S DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridianciLy.org/WebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=191860&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity F. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO(COMPASS) https://weblink.meridiancioy.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=189738&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCioX G. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.asp x?id=192646&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity H. SETTLER'S IRRIGATION DISTRICT(SID) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.asp x?id=188429&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity I. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridianciV.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=188183&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiy J. WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT(WASD) Page 64 Page 206 Item#7. https://weblink.meridianciV.oEgj ebLink/DocView.aspx?id=188717&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiV K. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) https://weblink.meridiancity.ory/WebLink/DocView.asp x?id=188 71 7&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity Page 65 Page 207 Item#7. X. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-513-3E): Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment to R-8, R-15 and C-G zoning districts and proposed development is generally consistent with the MDR and MU-R FL UM designations in the Comprehensive Plan for this property if the Applicant complies with the provisions in Section IX. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the mix of lot sizes and housing types proposed in the residential portion of the development will provide for a range of housing opportunities consistent with the purpose statement of the residential districts and with the Comprehensive Plan. The City Council finds the proposed medical offices and hospital along with recommended retail/restaurant uses will provide much needed services in the northern portion of the City in accord with the purpose statement of the commercial districts and with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The Commission finds the proposed zoning map amendment will not result in an adverse impact on the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City. Comments submitted by WASD indicate that existing enrollment numbers are below capacity in area schools that will serve this development. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The City Council finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City if the property is developed in accord with the provisions in Section IX. B. Preliminary Plat Findings(UDC 11-613-6): In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; The City Council finds that the proposed plat, with recommendations, is in substantial compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density, transportation, and pedestrian connectivity. (Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies in, Section V of this report for more information) Page 66 Page 208 Item#7. 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds that public services will be provided to the subject property with development. (See Exhibit B of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers) 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the development at their own cost, the City Council finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development based upon comments from the public service providers (i.e., Police, Fire, ACHD, etc). (See Section Mfor more information) 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and, The City Council is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated with the platting of this property. ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The City Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that exist on this site that require preserving. C. Private Street Findings(UDC 11-3F-5): In order to approve the application,the director shall find the following: 1. The design of the private street meets the requirements of this article; The Director finds that the proposed design of the private street deer met meets the requirements in UDC 11-3F-4A.6 as whieh are prehibite as. ether than these that er-e a common mew is proposed through the site design er . a limited gated-residential development-, of whieh neither are 19ropes 2. Granting approval of the private street would not cause damage,hazard, or nuisance, or other detriment to persons,property, or uses in the vicinity; and The Director finds granting approval of the private street pang�Ls proposed fire lanes are bleeked due to paF*4ffg in unautherized areas should not cause damage, hazard, or nuisance, or other detriment to persons,property or uses in the vicinity. 3. The use and location of the private street shall not conflict with the comprehensive plan and/or the regional transportation plan. (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) The Director finds the use and location of the private street meets does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan or the regional transportation plan. Page 67 Page 209 Item#7. 4. The proposed residential development(if applicable) is a mew or gated development. (Ord. 10- 1463, 11-3-2010, eff. 11-8-2010) The Director finds the proposed residential development deer no incorporates_a mew or gate developme in the design. in ofder-to grant approval for-an altemative compliance applieation, the Director-shall deter-mine the following! z. StfiEt adherence aF applioation-of ther-e"ir-ements are Diet feasible; OF ; and 3. The altemative means will fiet be materially detFimeatal to the ptiblie welfare aF impair- the intended uses and ehar-actef of suffounding pfopet4ies, Page 68 Page 210