2021-05-26 Lori Smith
Chris Johnson
From:Lori Smith <swimmersmiths@gmail.com>
Sent:Thursday, May 27, 2021 7:29 AM
To:Chris Johnson
Subject:Re: Skybreak Subdivision City Council Mtg 5/25
External Sender - Please use caution with links or attachments.
Thank you!
Lori
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 7:18 AM Chris Johnson <cjohnson@meridiancity.org> wrote:
Lori,
Good morning. While I was listening, I wasn’t necessarily following. I am going to copy Alan Tiefenbach, Associate
Planner, so that he can answer. Alan works with the details (and understands them) while I am listening for
denial/approval/continuance. I will add your email to the record when I get in the office so that your comments are
there for Council to review. The next public hearing will be at 6:00pm on June 29. The public hearing is still open so you
will have the opportunity to provide feedback on any new information the applicant submits (or about any part of the
project). Safe travels!
Chris
On May 26, 2021, at 10:20 PM, Lori Smith <swimmersmiths@gmail.com> wrote:
External Sender - Please use caution with links or attachments.
Hi Chris,
Another long night for you all! We just signed off the Council meeting for tonight. We are currently out
of town listening in with youtube, so I wanted to verify our understanding of councilman Bernd’s
suggestion to Jim Conger, that he would extend the half acre lots along the south border of the
Skybreak Sub application to the Farr lateral to create a better transition? Given the
discussion/negotiation tonight, we would like it to be known that the application doesn’t reflect our
western property boundary correctly. This is why I would like to have confirmation of what was said
about the 1/2 acre lots extended clear to the Farr lateral.
Regards,
Lori Smith
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 9:18 PM Lori Smith <swimmersmiths@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Chris,
Hope all is well. It looks like the next step in the process for Skybreak Sub H-2020-0127, after being
denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission, is for the developer to go directly to the Council for
an appeal? This is currently scheduled for May 25, 2021. I thought I saw that the developer had to
appeal the P&Z decision, but I haven't found that appeal posted. Additionally, the developer
submitted a response to staff comments that supposedly address and offer suggestions to the Council
to adopt their recommendations. How does this work? Do we write comments to refute the
developer response to staff comments?
1
My question for you, is do we send comments directly to the Council related to this project in addition
to comments we have already submitted during the P&Z meeting process and directly respond to the
suggestions to the Council from the developer? When are the new comments due, if suggested?
Thanks again for your help,
Lori Smith
Homeowner, Vantage Pointe Subdivision
All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in regards to
both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law.
2