2021-01-04
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING
City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho
Monday, January 04, 2021 at 3:30 PM
All materials presented at public meetings become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation
for disabilities should contact the City Clerk's Office at 208-888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
Agenda
VIRTUAL MEETING INSTRUCTIONS
Limited seating is available at City Hall Consider joining the meeting
virtually: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81903327249
To call in: 1-669-900-6833
Webinar ID: 819 0332 7249
ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE
_____ David Ballard _____ Luke Cavener, Ex-Officio
_____ Tom LeClaire _____ Shawn Martin, Ex-Officio
_____ Ryan Lancaster _____ Toni Tisdale, Ex-Officio
_____ Walter Steed _____ Ian Updike, Ex-Officio
_____ Tracy Hopkins _____ Alissa Tayson, Ex-Officio
_____ Stephen Lewis _____ Justin Price, Ex-Officio
_____ Jared Smith
_____ Joseph Leckie
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
COMMISSION ELECTIONS [ACTION ITEMS]
1. Election of Chair
2. Election of Vice Chair
APPROVAL OF MINUTES [ACTION ITEM]
3. December 7, 2020
OLD BUSINESS [ACTION ITEMS]
4. Transportation Projects Update
1
NEW BUSINESS [ACTION ITEMS]
5. Meridian Police Department Update
6. ACHD Integrated Five-Year Work Plan Priorities
7. Project Review Subcommittee Update
8. Eagle Road, Lake Hazel to Amity Scope of Work Discussion
9. Ordinance and Development Subcommittee Update
10. ATV/UTV Ordinance Draft 1st Reading
11. Staff Communications
FUTURE MEETING TOPICS
12. COMPASS High-Capacity Survey (February)
13. ACHD South Meridian Neighborhood Bike and Pedestrian Plan (February)
14. End of Year City Council Report (February)
15. 2nd Street Vision
16. Downtown Alleyways (March)
17. Comprehensive Plan and Master Mobility Map
18. Harvest Service Update
19. Main/King Crosswalk
20. US 20/26 @ Black Cat ITD Requirements
NEXT MEETING - February 1st, 2021
ADJOURNMENT
2
Meeting Minutes
Meridian Transportation Commission
December 7, 2020
Virtual Meeting Information
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82728806452
Or join by phone: Dial 253-215-8782 and enter Webinar ID: 827 2880 6452
Roll Call
(Meeting called to order at 3:35 p.m.; Zoom Meeting started and roll taken)
x David Ballard x Stephen Lewis x Shawn Martin (ex-officio via
Zoom late 3:43pm)
x David McKinney
(via-zoom)
x Jared Smith (via-zoom) x Toni Tisdale (ex-officio-via
Zoom)
x Ryan Lancaster x Tom LeClaire (via-zoom) x Ian Updike (ex-officio)
x Walter Steed
(via-zoom)
x Joseph Leckie (via-zoom) x Alissa Taysom (ex-officio via
Zoom)
x Tracy Hopkins
(Chambers & via
zoom)
x Luke Cavener (ex-officio) (via
zoom - late) o Justin Price (ex-officio via
zoom)
Others Present: Kristy Inselman, B. Frasier (via zoom),T. Baird (via zoom), C. Hood (via zoom),
and M. Carson, Stephen Hunt
Adoption of the Agenda
Chairman Ballard called for a motion to adopt the agenda. Commissioner Lewis motioned to
adopt as written; second by Commissioner Hopkins - all-ayes – motion carried.
Approval of Minutes
1. November 2nd, 2020
A motion by Commissioner Lewis was made to approve the November 2, 2020 minutes with
the noted time correction; second by Commissioner Lancaster - all ayes - motion carried.
Old Business Items
2. Transportation Projects Update (Miranda Carson)
Ms. Carson addressed the Commission and noted that she will not read the memo in its
entirety, but will highlight a few of the notable items, which the memo contained. Ms. Carson is
happy to answer any questions or review any items not specifically discussed at the end of her
review.
3
Item 3.
Ms. Carson noted that a joint letter from City Council and ACHD Commission will be sent to
ITD to request that the Linder, Overland to Franklin Rd project be added to the STIP.
Additional details of this can be found in the Staff Communications section of the packet on
page 29.
Ms. Carson also noted the Eagle Road, Amity to Victory project and the concerns highlighted
by City Council to ACHD, which led the ACHD team to explore additional options for
improved safety of the multiuse crossings at local cross-streets including Rome Drive. The two
preferred options proposed were Sharks Teeth and modifying landscaping to increase visibility.
Ms. Carson noted that the Eagle Road, Lake Hazel to Amity project draft scope of work is in
the staff communications and will be discussed in more detail later in the meeting.
Ms. Carson moved onto the Fairview, Locust Grove to Eagle & Locust Grove Signal and
highlighted the bike lane buffer being considered, including materials and pattern of the bike
lane coloring. VRT also, requested consideration of a future bus stop location on the far side of
Hickory Way and a planned open house is slotted for March 2021 prior to 95% design
completion. ACHD believes construction could be delayed until 2024.
Ms. Carson moved onto highlight the ITD projects and noted that the ID 16 to Linder widening
is complete. Construction is underway for both the Locust Grove Road to Eagle Road and the
Linder Road to Locust Grove Road projects.
Ms. Carson concluded her update with MDC/Other Projects and noted that Mr. Hunt would
expand more on the Harvest Lifestyle Service during his presentation, but staff is currently
reviewing and option to add service from Meridian to the Veteran’s Administration in Boise.
Ms. Carson concluded her review by noting that Ada County is kicking off the Ada County
Transportation Action Plan and working with Kittelson & Associates consulting to identify a
broad set of transportation policies, goals and strategies for unincorporated parts of Ada
County. The City has been invited to participate in the process.
Ms. Carson stood for questions, none took place.
New Business Items
3. Meridian Police Department Update (Sgt. Brandon Frasier)
Sgt. Frasier provided a brief update on the OHS grant money to address highway safety issues
in FY21. MPD is in the final stages of the discussions and being able to utilize funds.
Sgt. Frasier noted that the opening of Costco and the road improvements on Black Cat, Ustick,
Ten Mile and 20/26 are very helpful to PD and MFD.
Sgt. Frasier concluded his update by encouraging everyone to drive sober and safely as the
holiday season is upon us, and stood for questions, none took place.
4
Item 3.
4. Valley Regional Transit Update (Stephen Hunt)
Mr. Hunt Valley Regional Transit director presented and update to the Commission. He
covered 3 main topics:
Cooperative Agreement update
Harvest Transit and potential enhancements
Fixed route service expansion
Each year VRT engages with its partners and enter into an agreement to fund the services
provided. For the last 2 years VRT has been using a cost allocation methodology. VRT is
simplifying the agreement to leverage the resources they receive.
Mr. Hunt continued by providing a high-level review, of the PDF handout that was sent to the
Commission just prior to the meeting and is attached. This report contains more detail on the
current Cooperative Agreement and recommended changes. Mr. Hunt opened the floor for
questions on the Cooperative Agreement topic, none took place at that time.
Mr. Hunt, moved on the VRT Update and provided a brief overview and the gap in service
between Meridian and the Boise Veteran’s Affairs Medical Center (BVAMC). Due to the
impacts of COVID-19, and the reduction in service usage, VRT is looking at potential solutions
at low or no-cost to provide connections services to the BVAMC. Mr. Hunt stood for
questions on this portion of the presentation, which took place.
Mr. Hunt moved onto his last update regarding the Fixed Route Expansion that would connect
Ten-Mile crossing to Kleiner park and servicing downtown. Public feedback emphasized the
importance of regional connections both to Boise and Nampa. Discussions have been taking
place over the last year, but solutions and expansion have been delayed largely due to the
COVID impact. VRT is making a recommendation to the City to delay expansion until FY 2022
to allow ridership to normalize, smooth out ridership forecasts and allow additional time for
better coordination between the cities and route assessment. Mr. Hunt stood for questions, on
this topic or any other VTR items, none took place.
Chairman Ballard thanked Mr. Hunt and invited him back for future updates to the
Commission.
5. ACHD Integrated Five-year work Plan Priorities (IFYWP) (All)
Chairman Ballard opened this topic and noted that a project overview will occur before
discussion. Ms. Carson noted that Ms. Inselman should be joining and could provide additional
context once online, but at this time Ms. Carson would provide a brief overview.
Each year ACHD request prioritization of projects by municipality. Those that have been on
the Commission for sometime are familiar with the process. ACHD sent a letter in November,
to the City, requesting feedback to ACHD by February 24, 2021. The Commission reviews the
current priority listing and provides a recommendation to City Council and City Council
5
Item 3.
provides a response back to ACHD. It is crucial for the Commission to provide a final
recommendation to City Council in January, so Council can respond by February 24th to
ACHD.
The goal for today’s meeting is to review the Roadways and Intersection projects portion of
the priorities. In January the objective will be to review and finalize the recommendation
inclusive of the Community Projects to provide a recommendation to City Council. Ms. Carson
stood for questions on the process prior to review of the projects, none took place.
Ms. Carson shared the priority listing and the Commission began their review and provided
comments on the reprioritization of projects.
Chairman Ballard opened the floor for discussion. Commissioner Hopkins gave feedback on
dropping 2020 Priority item #5 and #26 down because they are currently underway.
Commissioner Hopkins felt that the Transportation Commission over the last couple years has
done a thorough review and thus the prioritizations remained accurate.
Chairman Ballard inquired to Ms. Carson on the priorities of the transportation work group
the Mayor’s office hosts. Ms. Carson, inquired Dave Miles on feedback from the transportation
work group and their priorities and its impact on the ACHD Prioritization list. Chief of Staff,
Dave Miles, noted the distinction between the Transportation Commission’s objectives and the
work group’s objectives and thus had no input edits for the ACHD IFYWP. Ms. Carson also
noted that she will have feedback from the Park’s & Rec department for the January meeting
and has a scheduled meeting with the West Ada School district on their recommendation and
which she will share in January. Discussion with the Commission continued.
Commissioner Lewis requested additional information (Peak hour level of service map-to
reference for evaluation of Intersection and Roadways, and the North Meridian and Downtown
Neighborhood plans-as reference for Community Projects) in order to aid in his evaluation and
recommendation of any edits to the priority list.
Ms. Inselman, from ACHD, joined the meeting and reviewed the IFYWP PowerPoint
presentation. Ms. Inselman provided a brief introduction and quick overview of the ACHD
IFYWP and its purpose. Last year the City of Meridian submitted 69 Roadway and Intersection
requests and 43 Community Program request to ACHD. All projects receive prioritization
points, but ranking does impact weight of those projects, for example the top 10-15 are
weighted higher than the bottom 20 items on the list.
Ms. Inselman then provided a high-level review of the interactive ACHD Prioritization Tool and
its content for Fiscal Years 2021-2025 for all of its partner cities/agencies. Ms. Inselman
reviewed the Prioritization Criteria, including ranked project evaluation (from each
partner/agency), project scoping (including cost estimates). This information is used to develop
the initial draft prioritization listing which is then shared with the partner agencies, typically
mid-July at the second ACHD open house. ACHD will hold its first open house in February.
Each year the IFYWP is reviewed/edited. Ms. Inselman shared the IFYWP update process
timeline which is directly tied to ACHD’s budget year along with upcoming key dates.
6
Item 3.
Ms. Inselman stood for questions, which took place.
Chairman Ballard thanked Ms. Inselman and invited her back for any future updates.
Chairman Ballard did a time check and continued the meeting to finalize discussion on the
IFYWP priorities. A brief high-level review of the Community Projects list took place and
request from Commissioner Lancaster for staff to bring forth any new projects that they may
be aware of that need prioritization to be added to the list.
Ms. Carson will add new potential project information and any comments received from the
Commissioners to the list for January’s meeting.
6. Staff Communications (M. Carson)
Ms. Carson noted that the Staff Communications section contained several updates and that
she would highlight a few but not all items. Ms. Carson is happy to review any items not
explicitly discussed and answer questions at the end of her review.
Ms. Carson directed the Commission to her first update on page 28 of the packet. ACHD is
creating a South Meridian Neighborhood Plan, similar to the Downtown and North Meridian
Neighborhood plan. The next item is the Linder Road overpass joint support letter, which is
included in the packet.
On page 31, there is a correspondence from Mr. Hood to Jayme Coonce regarding a concern
about a no deceleration lane on Westbound 20/26 at Black Cat. This is currently being handled
at a staff level but no solution is currently proposed. Mr. Hood spoke to this item and
answered questions from the Commission.
Ms. Carson concluded the Staff Communications update with the Looking Glass Academy 2-day
Walking Audit Report and memo that begin on page 99.
Ms. Carson stood for questions, which took place, and Chairman Ballard closed the item.
7. Ordinance and Development Subcommittee Update (T. LeClaire)
Commissioner LeClaire gave a brief update on the subcommittee’s progress. As noted in the
response from ACHD, on page 26, and Ms. Kane’s follow up with ACHD, “controlled access
highways” encompass Arterials or Collectors, which ban UTV/ATV by state statute.
Commissioner LeClaire stated that with this information the subcommittee has enough
information for the City Attorney’s office to draft an ordinance consistent with State Statute,
for local streets, to present to the Commission at the January 4th meeting and ultimately make a
recommendation to City Council.
7
Item 3.
Commissioner LeClaire stood for questions, which took place.
8. Roundabouts and Alternative Intersections (Ryan Lancaster)
Commissioner Lancaster gave a brief presentation that included information on Alternative
Intersections and specifically Roundabouts. Commissioner Lancaster shared some Intersection
Safety Facts from the Federal Highway Administration and four alternative intersection types
and shared some contextual comments.
Roundabouts - will be discussed more in depth later in the presentation
Restricted-Crossing U-Turn (RCUT)
Median U-Turns
Displace Left-Turn (DLT)
One reason an alternative intersection is used is to mitigate left turn safety concerns as they
represent the largest portion of severe crashes. Another reason is to limit the size of an
intersection, bigger doesn’t necessarily mean better throughput.
Roundabouts can be used in multiple scenarios, urban/rural, low/high speed situations. Modern
designs are safer and more efficient and reduce severe crashes. Commissioner Lancaster briefly
reviewed the U-Turn Intersections slide and their purpose.
During the topic Commissioner Lewis motioned to extend the meeting to 5:40; second by
Commissioner Hopkins – all Ayes – motion passed and Commissioner Lancaster continued his
presentation.
Commissioner Lancaster shared information on Modern Roundabouts in more depth along
with safety results compared to traditional signaled intersections. Commissioner Lancaster did
a high-level review on the following items as it relates to Roundabouts and provided context on
the significance of each:
Design (entrance/exit points)
Signage
A map of Roundabouts in Meridian
Before and after survey data on the perception of roundabouts, in general. Data shows
that there are a lot fewer crashes with Roundabouts compared to traditional signaled
intersections (see slide).
Pedestrians, schools, and improved safety (crossing two one-way streets at lower
speeds)
Bicyclists (two options)
Trucks/Large Vehicles
Commissioner Lancaster concluded and stood for questions, which took place.
Chairman Ballard opened the floor for any other topics for discussion and reviewed the Future
Meeting Topics.
8
Item 3.
Commissioner Lancaster noted that per Ordinance the Commission needs to do its elections in
January, and Ms. Carson noted the open position that was posted in the Meridian Press.
Vice-Chairman McKinney noted that this will be his last meeting with the Meridian
Transportation Commission, as he is newly elected to the ACHD Commission and thanked the
Commissioners for their friendship and comradery.
Future Meeting Topics
9. Project Review Subcommittee Update (January)
10. COMPASS High-Capacity Survey (February)
11. Eagle, Lake Hazel to Amity (February)
12. Downtown Alleyways (March)
13. US 20/26 @ Black Cat ITD Requirements
14. Comprehensive Plan and Master Mobility Map
15. Valley Regional Transit Update: Fixed and Harvest
16. Main/King Crosswalk
Next Meeting Date: January 4, 2021
Adjourn
Chairman Ballard thanked Commissioner McKinney for his service and asked for a motion to
adjourn, which was made by Commissioner Hopkins. Meeting adjourned at 5:40.
(AUDIO RECORDING AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST)
APPROVED:
_______________________ _______________
DAVID BALLARD, CHAIR DATE
ATTEST:
________________________ _______________
CHRIS JOHNSON (City Clerk) DATE
9
Item 3.
700 NE 2ND STREET, SUITE 100 | MERIDIAN, ID 83642 | P / 208.846.8547 F / 208.846.8564 1.855.345.7433
TOPIC Meridian Transportation Commission Meeting Update
DATE 12/07/2020
STAFF MEMEBER Stephen Hunt
Summary
City of Meridian staff asked VRT to prepare a presentation to the Meridian Transportation
Commission to provide an update and entertain a discussion about the following three
topics:
1. VRT’s Cooperative Agreement with the City of Meridian
2. Potential enhancements to the Harvest Transit services
3. Planned fixed route service expansion
VRT Cooperative Agreement with the City of Meridian
Each year VRT and the City of Meridian enter into a cooperative agreement for the funding of
public transportation services benefiting the City of Meridian. For roughly the past two years,
VRT has been updating the methodology used to determine each jurisdiction’s funding
contribution. This process is called the local cost allocation methodology.
The local cost allocation methodology provides an objective and transparent method for
determining each jurisdiction’s share of regional and local services. In the past service and
cost details were included directly into the cooperative agreement. With th e new
methodology VRT is recommending removing the cost details from the cooperative
agreement (see attachment A). This will provide the necessary transparency to the public
and City of Meridian while ensuring VRT has the flexibility to leverage all funds received to
the greatest extent possible.
Currently, the contributions the City of Meridian makes to VRT through the cooperative
agreement support Harvest Transit, Meridian Senior Center transportation expenses, current
and planned fixed route service, customers service support and other regional activities.
Potential Enhancements to Harvest Transit Services
City of Meridian staff has requested that VRT to build on the success of Harvest Transit and
explore opportunities to provide a connection to the Boise Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
VRT staff has begun looking at different alternatives and given the cost savings from last
year due to the reduced demand on Harvest Transit, these solutions will be no/low cost
options. VRT staff will continue to develop concepts through the month of December. These
options will consider implementation dates as early as early 2021.
Fixed Route Service Expansion Update
VRT has been working with the City of Meridian for the last 18 months on implementing new
fixed route service connecting downtown Meridian to Ten Mile Crossing and Kleiner Park.
Working with the Meridian Development Corporation and other stakeholders we have built
bus stop pads with room for transit shelters at Ten Mile Crossing, downtown Meridian and at
Kleiner Park. We are also preparing to take delivery early next year of the first round of
electric buses, which will allow us to expand our peak hour serv ices. This service is a critical
connection for downtown Meridian and helps build a regional transit corridor on Fairview.
10
Item 3.
However, because of the reduced demand for transit services during COVID-19 and the
opportunity to align the roll-out of this Meridian connection with a regional connection to
Boise, VRT staff is recommending delaying the start of the planned Meridian service
expansion until FY2022.
Delaying the start of service would also smooth out the local allocation requests between
2021 and 2023 (see table 1 below). This would hedge against any longer term impacts of
COVID-19, or the money saved by deferring the start date could be used to make additional
capital improvements on this or other transit services.
Table 1
More Information
Attachments: Excerpts from Past and Proposed VRT Cooperative Agreements with the City of
Meridian
For detailed information contact: Stephen Hunt, Development Director, 208-258-2701,
email: shunt@valleyregionaltransit.org.
11
Item 3.
Attachment A: Excerpts from Past and Proposed VRT Cooperative Agreements with the City of Meridian
2020 Excerpt from Recitals and Agreement Purpose
2020 Recitals
f. VRT has budgeted $736,857 for Member to contribute for its Annual VRT Assessment,
Transportation Services, and Capital Contribution and Enhanced Service; Member has
budgeted the same amount for its Annual VRT Assessment, Transportation Services, a nd
Capital Contribution and Enhanced Service.
Annual VRT Assessment $49,324
Transportation Services
Intercounty Service Contribution $99,349
Ridesharing Services
Harvest Transit $129,184
Rides 2 Wellness $40,000
Ridesharing Services Sub Total $169,184
Annual VRT Assessment and Transportation Services Sub Total $317,857
Capital Contribution and Enhanced Service $419,000
Grand Total $736,857
g. Transportation Services support the following modes:
1) Intercounty Services
Nampa Express Service (Route 40): Operates between Nampa and Boise making
a limited number of designated stops in Nampa, Meridian, and Boise. The service
operates Monday through Friday from 5:30 A.M. to 7:02 P.M. The service
generally utilizes 32 passenger, 2 wheelchair capacity buses each equipped with a
bicycle rack.
Nampa Limited Stop Service (Route 42): Operates between Nampa and Boise
making several designated stops in Nampa, Meridian, and Boise. The service
operates Monday through Friday from 6:20 A.M. to 8:05 P.M. The service
generally utilizes 38 passenger, 2 wheelchair capacity buses each equipped with a
bicycle rack.
2) Ridesharing Services support additional lifestyle and supportive transportation to
Meridian seniors and persons with disabilities. In Meridian these services include
Harvest Transit operates within the city limits of Meridian and is free to qualified
passengers. This curb-to-curb service operates utilizing three accessible
wheelchair-lift vans Monday through Saturday 9:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M., with
occasional special trips and outings for qualified Meridian residents on
weeknights and Sundays.
12
Item 3.
Attachment A: Excerpts from Past and Proposed VRT Cooperative Agreements with the City of Meridian
Rides 2 Wellness provides qualified patients of St. Luke's or St. Alphonsus
transportation to appointments at approved clinics. The service operates by
reservation between 7:30 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. weekdays.
h. Capital Contribution and Enhanced Service supports the following;
1) Pro curement of two battery electric vehicles.
2) Construction of necessary transit stops and facilities for additional fixed route service in
Meridian.
3) Funding for additional transportation services in Meridian.
2020 Agreement
Section 2. Purpose
The purpose of this Agreement is:
(a) For Member to pay Annual VRT Assessment and Transportation Services contributions
to VRT for Fiscal Year 2020 in the amount of $317,857.
(b) For VRT to use said Annual VRT Assessment for costs budgeted under its regional
planning and program administration, and to use said Transportation Services contributions for
costs budgeted under its regional operating plan.
(c) For Member to pay Capital Contribution and Enhanced Service in Fiscal Year 2020. The
costs of these additional services are estimated at $419,000.
(d) For VRT to use said Capital Contribution and Enhanced Service for costs budgeted to
bring additional transportation services to Meridian.
13
Item 3.
Attachment A: Excerpts from Past and Proposed VRT Cooperative Agreements with the City of Meridian
Excerpt from Proposed Recitals and Agreement Purpose
2021 Proposed Recitals Excerpt
f. Authority has budgeted $442,706 for City to contribute to support services, capital and
regional overhead expenses. City has budgeted the same amount representing the City’s fair
share of support for services, capital, and regional overhead.
g. Authority generally follows the allocation methodology to designate how City
contributions are used. However, Authority may leverage City contributions as local match to
optimize utilization of both local and federal sources of funding to ensure the most effective
use of all revenue sources.
2021 Proposed Agreement Excerpt
Section 3. Purpose
The purpose of this Agreement is:
(a) For City to pay $442,706 to Authority for Fiscal Year 2021 expenses pertaining to
services, capital, and regional overhead required to support the regional transportation
services within the City’s jurisdiction.
(b) For Authority to use City’s contribution for service, capital, and regional overhead expenses
included in the annual FY2021 budget to support services within City’s jurisdiction.
(c) For Authority to leverage City’s contribution with matching federal funding to optimize all revenue
sources available for operations, capital, and regional overhead.
14
Item 3.
MEMO TO TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Agenda Topic on the Transportation Commission Agenda
From: Miranda Carson, Coordination Planner Meeting Date: January 4, 2021
Presenter: Miranda Carson Estimated Time: 10 minutes
Topic: Transportation Projects Update
Below is a summary/update on some of the transportation and roadway projects City Staff has
been involved with recently. This is not an exhaustive list, but rather highlights some of the more
important activities that have recently transpired (or are about to occur) in the transportation
realm. Staff will be at the meeting to discuss some of these topics in more detail. Please feel
free to contact staff should you have any comments, concerns, or questions on any of these
projects. New information is in bold.
KEY ACHD PROJECTS:
ACHD Integrated Five-Year Work Program: The 2021-20245 IFYWP was adopted by the ACHD
commission on September 23rd, 2020 and can be found here:
https://www.achdidaho.org/Departments/PlansProjects/IFYWP.aspx
Cherry Lane and Meridian Library Pedestrian Crossing: Substantial completion December
2020. $214,000 cost. Installation of a pedestrian hybrid beacon crossing (PHB) with Z-crossing
on Cherry Lane between the existing signalized intersections at West 8th and Linder Road. This
work also includes new sidewalks and crosswalks. Here is a link to the project website:
http://achdidaho.org/Projects/proj_road_cherry-lane-meridian-library-ped-crossing.aspx
Linder, Overland to Franklin: Widen Linder Rd to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk and a Level
3 bike facility from Overland Rd to Franklin Rd as per the 2020 CIP and the Bike Master Plan.
Project includes a new 4-lane I-84 overpass. Joint project between ACHD and ITD. This project
is listed as future in the adopted IFYWP. After a joint ACHD Commission and City Council
meeting on October 22nd, a joint letter of support will be sent to the Idaho Transportation Board
requesting this project be added to the STIP. This project was also recently submitted to
COMPASS for the FY21-15 Project Development Grant for $25,000.
Eagle Road, Amity to Victory and roundabout at Amity: Seepage bed installation, irrigation
and stormwater pipes, and utility work are ongoing. A temporary pedestrian crossing and
pedestrian crossing at Ten-mile Road are ongoing. Due to concerns by City Council, the
15
Item 4.
ACHD team met to explore options for improving safety of the multiuse crossings at local cross -
streets. The two preferred strategies from the project team included: striping yield lines (also
known as Sharks Teeth) at local streets and at Rome Drive, to explore modifying the existing
landscaping to increase visibility. Widen Eagle to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk and bike
lanes. Includes a 2 lane roundabout with a slip lane at the northwest corner at Amity for
southbound traffic turning west. Also includes enhanced crossings at the pedestrian pathway
near the Ten Mile Feeder Canal, a pedestrian crossing at Rome Dr, and a roundabout at Zaldia
Ln. Design will be done with in-house, ACHD resources. Construction is planned for 2021 in the
IFYWP. NOTE: There is insufficient right-of-way on Amity west of Eagle to allow the striping of
the bike lane on the north side of the road, so it will only be the two travel lanes westbound, the
center turn lane, and one eastbound travel lane until ACHD can program a project there in the
future and widen to the south. The west side of Eagle Road will be fully improved including a
multi-use path. Here is the project website: http://achdidaho.org/Projects/proj_road_eagle-road-
amity-road-to-victory-road.aspx
Ten Mile/Amity Intersection: This project was on the December 90 day bid list with Notice to
Proceed in February 2021. This project is shown for construction in 2021 in the adopted IFYWP.
Construct a multi-lane roundabout at Ten Mile Rd and Amity Rd as per the 2020 CIP. Project
includes Ten Mile Bridge #1182. Here is the project website:
http://achdidaho.org/Projects/proj_intersection_ten-mile-road-and-amity-road-roundabout.aspx
8th St at Meridian Middle: Install enhanced pedestrian crossings at NW 8th St and Meridian
Middle School. This project was on the December 90 day bid list with Notice to Proceed in June
2021.
Lake Hazel and Eagle Signal: Widen and signalize intersection to 4/5 lanes on Eagle and 3/4
lanes on Lake Hazel. Design is happening this calendar year, right -of-way in 2021-2022, and
construction in 2022 in the IFYWP. Design details are on the project webpage. Here is a link to
the project website:
http://achdidaho.org/Projects/proj_intersection_lake-hazel-and-eagle.aspx
Locust Grove Road, Victory to Overland: Notice to proceed has been issued for December
2021. Widen Locust Grove to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk and Level 2 bike facility. Design
is planned for 2019, right-of-way in 2020-2021 and construction in 2022 in the IFYWP with a
cost of $4.07M. PIM held 9/10/2019. The 50% plans shared with Council o n October 8th. There
is some concern about the cross-section and impacts to neighborhoods. Council discussed this
project during a work session on February 25th. A letter was sent to ACHD regarding the design
of the bicycle and pedestrian facilities the week of February 24th. Here is the project website:
http://achdidaho.org/Projects/proj_road_locust-grove-victory-to-overland.aspx
Victory/Locust Grove Roundabout: Notice to proceed has been issued for December 2021.
Construct a multi-lane roundabout. Design is in 2019, right-of-way acquisition in 2020-2021, and
construction is planned for 2022-2023 in the adopted IFYWP with a cost of $4.1M. Projects
includes replacement/widening of bridge #2116 over the Tenmile Creek on Victory Rd. This
project will be done with in-house design.
16
Item 4.
Ten Mile Road, Victory to Overland: Notice to proceed has been issued for November 2021.
Widen Ten Mile to 5-lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk and a Level 3 bike facility. In the IFYWP,
this project was designed in 2019, right -of-way in 2020-2021, and construction in 2022-2023 at
a cost of $3.9M. Here is the project website:
http://achdidaho.org/Projects/proj_road_ten-mile-victory-to-overland.aspx
Eagle Road, Lake Hazel to Amity: Design has begun with a scope of work. Widen Eagle to 5
lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk and Level 3 bike facility. Includes a roundabout at Eagle Rd
and Taconic Dr. Construction is planned for 2023 in the adopted IFYWP with a cost of $3.4M.
Fairview, Locust Grove to Eagle & Locust Grove Signal: Design work is ongoing. Design team
is exploring permeable asphalt options for the bike lane. The design and materials of the
sidewalk to bike lane buffer is also being considered carefully as is the material and pattern of
the bike lane’s green coloring in conflict areas. The Hickory Way island may be removed to have
an additional lane out to Fairview, and VRT has requested consideration of a future bus stop on
Fairview on the far side of Hickory Way. There will likely be an open house around March 2021
before 95% design is complete, and construction may be delayed to 2024 . Widen intersection
to 9 lanes on Fairview and 7 lanes on Locust Grove. Widen Fairview to 7 lanes with curb, gutter,
sidewalk and Level 3 bike facility. Design in 2020-2021, right-of-way acquisition in 2021-22, and
construction in 2023 in adopted IFYWP with a cost of $4.26M. Here is a link to the project
website:
https://www.achdidaho.org/Projects/proj_road_fairview-avenue-locust-grove-road-to-eagle-
road.aspx
Lake Hazel Road, Eagle to Cloverdale: Widen Lake Hazel to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, and Level
3 bike facility. Design will be done in 2022. Construction is planned for 2024 in the adopted
IFYWP with a total cost of $2.3M.
Overland/Eagle Signal: Widen intersection to 7 lanes on Eagle and 9 on Overland. Project to be
done in coordination with ITD. Design is indicated for 2025 in the IFYWP. All phases shown as
Unfunded in the IFYWP at a cost of $8.16M.
FY20 Capital Maintenance, Phase 1: Locust Grove, Ustick to McMillan pipe and roadway work
will be done in Spring 2021.
ITD PROJECTS
ChindenWest Corridor: This project will result in 4 travel lanes (two in each direction). Widening
will take place to the south of the existing alignment and be constructed to accommodate future
widening to 6 travel lanes (three in each direction) with high capacity intersections at roads with
river crossings. Project website:
www.ITDprojects.org/ChindenWest
17
Item 4.
ID-16 to Linder: The widening of this section of Chinden Boulevard is complete. The new
roadway includes four 12-foot travel lanes, two in each direction, and a detached 10-foot
pathway to the south for bicyclists and pedestrians.
Locust Grove Road to Eagle Road: Four lanes open December 2020. These changes come
with new turning movements out of the Banbury and Bristol Heights neighborhoods.
Linder Road to Locust Grove Road: Utility and earth work is underway on the south side of
Chinden, between Fox Run Way and Meridian Road. Pedestrians will be detoured to the road
shoulder, separated from traffic by a concrete barrier. Fox Run Way, south of Chinden, is
closed through November, from Chinden to Boulder Bar Lane, as crews remove the overhead
structure, widen the roadway and connect the road with the Linder Village development.
Additionally, the sidewalk on the west side of Fox Run is closed. The east side sidewalk is
open for pedestrian use.
Star Road to ID-16: Construction is planned for 2024.
Idaho Highway 16 extension, U.S. 20/26 to I -84: ITD has completed the re-evaluation of the
2011 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS ) and preliminary design of Idaho 16. ITD is in the
process of acquiring property now and anticipates this will continue through 2021. ITD is
investigating funding sources and options. The Idaho Transportation Board has allocated
nearly $90 million to acquire right-of-way for the future highway. The remaining cost to design
and construct the corridor is estimated to be $350 million (in 2019 dollars). Project website:
www.ITDprojects.org/Idaho16
SH-69, Kuna to Meridian Traffic Study: ITD has completed enough technical evaluation to now
present a proposal to the public. ITD hosted an online public engagement from June 29 – July
20 to solicit feedback on the work to date. ITD will consider the feedback and make appropriate
updates to the plan before presenting the plan for concurrence to the Cities of Meridian and
Kuna and ACHD. Here is a link to the project website:
https://itdprojects.org/projects/id69corridor/
PATHWAYS
Rail with Trail: In the fall of 2012, the City applied for an $85,000 grant to study the Rail with Trail
(RWT) pathway crossing of streets (7 crossings; Black Cat to Locust Grove). Currently, there
are funds for pathway construction in the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) in
2022.
Nine Mile Creek, Linder to Meridian: The path is proposed to run from Linder to Meridian along
the Nine Mile Creek drain just north of the railroad; this is COMPASS project # KN 13918.
Federal funding close to $400k has been allocated, but no federal funds have been used yet as
the scope is not fully defined. City Parks Department is currently working with a consultant to
negotiate easements for four (4) parcels from Linder to 8 th St. The City currently has obtained
all but one required easement from 8th to 3rd. We are currently pursuing acquisition of
easements from 8th Street west to Linder, and from 3rd Street to Meridian Road as a future
phase of this project.
18
Item 4.
Five Mile Creek Pathway: The City applied for a COMPASS grant to design and construct a
portion of the Five Mile Creek pathway near the Wastewater Resource Recovery Center
(WWRRC). The City informed COMPASS that we will pursue completion of this project with local
funds instead of Federal. There has been purchase and development action on the properties
north of Five Mile Creek, west of the WWRRC. Additionally, ACHD has purchased a parcel to
the south of the WWRRC. It appears that the bulk of this pathway will be constructed by these
new owners as a condition of development. The City plans to invest in pedestrian crossings of
the Nine Mile and Five Mile Drains to skirt the WWRRC and achieve continuity with existing
McNelis Pathway along the Five Mile Drain.
North Meridian Neighborhood Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan: ACHD and several partners including
the City have been working on developing a plan to help improve walking and bicycling routes
in North Meridian neighborhoods. This plan is complementary to the City’s Pathways Plan with
more of an emphasis on on-street bike facilities. The North Meridian Neighborhood Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan was adopted by the ACHD Commission on September 23rd. Here is a link to the
project site:
https://www.achdidaho.org/Projects/proj_program_north-meridian-neighborhood-bicycle-and-
pedestrian-plan.aspx
MDC / OTHER PROJECTS
2nd Street, Idaho to Broadway: Discussions are beginning on how to make 2nd Street in
Downtown Meridian a community place. More information will be coming in future
meetings.
Harvest Lifestyle Service: Staff is reviewing an option to ad service from Meridian to the
Veteran’s Administration in Boise. A public transit service focusing on seniors and persons with
disabilities has been operating since December 2016. This Lifestyle Service concept, which
includes two service zones, was presented to the Council in July of 2016. The service is operated
by Harvest Church. An enhancement to the City Budget for FY2019 was approved by the Council
for a third Harvest van. The third van is operational.
Transit: VRT has won a grant for electric buses. Staff from the City and VRT are coordinating
infrastructure, capital and service needs for a route from the Ten Mile Interchange area through
downtown to The Village. The launch will likely be delayed closer to October 2021. The TC will
be actively involved in developing outreach plan, stops/alignment, and other service
considerations (i.e. – time of day operation, amenities/shelters, etc.) (This route is part of the
ValleyConnect 2.0 plan.)
Ada County Transportation Action Plan: Ada County, working with consultant Kittelson &
Associates, is kicking off the development of the Ada County Transportation Action Plan (TAP).
The purpose of the TAP is for Ada County to identify a broad set of transportation policies, goals,
and strategies for the unincorporated parts of Ada County. This project is in the earliest stage ,
and the City has been invited to participate in the process.
19
Item 4.
Eagle Road Bike/Ped Project Development: COMPASS has contracted with Keller Associates
to further develop a bicycle and pedestrian plan for the corridor. The boundaries of the project
are Overland and Chinden.
Shared Vehicles: On Friday, December 13th a Request for Proposals (RFP) was issued for
shared vehicle (e-scooters) services for 2020. The RFP was sent to six known, potential
vendors/contractors. A pre-proposal conference was held on Friday, December 27th; no one
attended in person. Proposals are due prior to 4:00 pm on Friday, January 10, 2020. One
response was received, from Slidr LLC. On January 23 rd a 7-member scoring team met to
discuss the proposal. The scoring team recommended that City Council not enter into a contract
with any vendor at this time due to all of the construction and lack of destinations currently. The
scoring team further recommended that the MDBA continue to monitor the climate and
recommend back to the City when they believe another RFP should be issued. On January 28 th,
these recommendations were presented to the Mayor and City Council. The Council largely
concurred with the scoring team’s recommendation and further recommended that Staff be part
of discussions around a regional management model for micro mobility.
20
Item 4.
MEMO TO TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Agenda Topic on the Transportation Commission Agenda
From: Miranda Carson, Coordination Planner Meeting Date: January 4, 2021
Presenter: Miranda Carson Estimated Time: Discussion: 45 minutes
Topic: ACHD Integrated Five-Year Work Plan Priorities
On November 4th, the City received a letter from ACHD notifying us that work was starting on the
FY2021-2025 Integrated Five-Year Work Plan (IFYWP). Annually, the City prepares transportation
priority lists for the transportation agencies to consider in their programming and budget
processes. The Meridian Transportation Commission (TC) is tasked with making recommendations
to the City Council on priority transportation projects. ACHD is requesting all project requests be
submitted no later than February 24th, 2021.
In December the Transportation Commission began the prioritization of roadway and intersection
projects. The goal of this meeting is to finalize the two prioritization lists: roadway and intersection
projects and Community Programs (CP) projects (e.g. – sidewalks). These lists will then be shared
and endorsed by the Mayor and City Council and sent to ACHD before the February 24th deadline.
ACHD has also updated an online interactive prioritization tool for use when preparing request
lists. This includes the adopted 21-25 IFYWP map.
https://achd.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=727c6dccbbcf492abcadb1f1f8
2e36af
As requested at the December 7th meeting, the ACHD North Meridian Neighborhood Bicycle &
Pedestrian Plan can be found on the ACHD website here:
https://www.achdidaho.org/Projects/proj_program_north-meridian-neighborhood-bicycle-and-
pedestrian-
plan.aspx#:~:text=General%20Description%3A,projects%20and%2057%20bicycle%20projects.
&text=Learn%20about%20sidewalk%20and%20bike%20projects%20proposed%20for%20Nort
h%20Meridian!
Attachments:
ACHD Prioritization Request Form
Level of Service Map
Roadways and Intersections Projects Map
Community Programs Projects Map
21
Item 6.
Design YR ROW YR
Construction
YR
1
Locust Grove Rd, Victory Rd / Overland
Rd
Widen Locust Grove Rd to 5 lanes with
curb,gutter,sidewalk and bike lanes in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.2019 2020-2021 2022 Project to be built in 2022.Locust Grove Rd, Victory Rd / Overland Rd Discovery Park
2 Linder Rd, Overland Rd / Franklin Rd
Widen Linder Rd to 5 lanes and construct a
new 4-lane 1-84 overpass,including curb,
gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.Project
would be a joint project between ACHD
and ITD Future Future Future
Project added to IFYWP for discussion
purposes.ACHD to coordinate with ITD on
request.Project to move forward when
funding partnership is possible.Linder Rd, Overland Rd / Franklin Rd
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High B26 / S6
Install Level 3 bike facilities
from I-84 to Franklin and
connect sidewalk gaps on
west side from I-84 to
Franklin
3
Locust Grove Rd, Fairview Ave / Ustick
Rd
Widen Locust Grove Rd to 5 lanes with
curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Per City request,ACHD to coordinate with
Meridian to discuss scope.Locust Grove Rd, Fairview Ave / Ustick Rd
4 Fairview Ave and Locust Grove Rd
Widen intersection to 9 lanes on Fairview
Ave and 7 lanes on Locust Grove Rd,
including curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike
lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP.2020-2021 2021-2022 2023 Project to be built in 2023.Fairview Ave and Locust Grove Rd
6 Ten Mile Rd, Victory Rd / Overland Rd
Widen Ten Mile Rd to 5 lanes with curb,
gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.2019 2020-2021 2022-2023 Project to be built in 2022-2023.Ten Mile Rd, Victory Rd / Overland Rd
7 Victory Rd, Locust Grove Rd / Eagle Rd
Widen Victory Rd to 3 lanes with curb,
gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.2023 2024 Future Project to begin design in 2023.Victory Rd, Locust Grove Rd / Eagle Rd Discovery Park
8 Ustick Rd, Ten Mile Rd / Linder Rd
Widen Ustick Rd to 5 lanes with curb,
gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.2022 2023 2025 Project to be built in 2025.Ustick Rd, Ten Mile Rd / Linder Rd
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High B57 Install Level 3 bike facilities
9 Linder Rd, Cherry Ln / Ustick Rd
Widen Linder Rd to 3 lanes with curb,
gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in
accordance with 2016 CIP.2025 Future Future Project to begin design in 2025.Linder Rd, Cherry Ln / Ustick Rd
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High S7
Connect gaps from existing
sidewalk on both sides
10 Locust Grove Rd, Amity Rd / Victory Rd
Widen Locust Grove Rd to 3 lanes with
curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.Locust Grove Rd, Amity Rd / Victory Rd
11
Victory Rd, Meridian Rd / Locust Grove
Rd
Widen Victory Rd to 3 lanes with curb,
gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.2023 2024 2025 Project to be built in 2025.
Victory Rd, SH 69 (Meridian Rd) / Locust Grove
Rd Parks/Schools
12 Ten Mile Rd / Cherry Ln
Intersection improvements to include dual
left turn lanes.2025 Future Future Project to begin design in 2025.Ten Mile Rd and Cherry Ln
13 Eagle Rd / Overland Rd
Intersection improvements to include dual
left turn lanes.2025 Future Future Project to begin design in 2025.Overland Rd and Eagle Rd
14
McMillan Rd, Meridian Rd / Locust
Grove Rd
Widen McMillan Rd to 3 lanes with curb,
gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.
McMillan Rd, SH 69 (Meridian Rd) / Locust Grove
Rd
15 McMillan Rd, Linder Rd / Meridian Rd
Widen McMillan Rd to 3 lanes with curb,
gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.McMillan Rd, Linder Rd / SH 69 (Meridian Rd)
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High
B40 /
S15 / C6
Install Level 3 bike facilities;
Connect gaps from existing
sidewalk on the south side;
Install an enhanced crossing
(pedestrian hybrid beacon)
and widened shoulders on
McMillan Road at the Summit
Way intersection in order for
pedestrians/bicyclists
traveling along local roads to
access Settlers Park.
16
Victory Rd and Locust Grove Rd
Roundabout
Construct a multi-lane roundabout with 2
lanes on Locust Grove legs and 1 lane on
Victory legs in accordance with the 2016
CIP.2019 2020-2021 2022-2023 Project to be built in 2022-2023.Victory Rd and Locust Grove Rd Roundabout Discovery Park
2. Utilize the first column to reevaluate your prioritization ranking. Adjust as needed.
Notes
3. Blank lines are provided at the end of each category to add additional projects. Provide a clear description of the project request.
4. Remember to identify projects for removal.
2021
Priority
Ranking
2020
Priority
Ranking Agency Project Name Agency Project Description
Current IFYWP Programming Status
ACHD Response ACHD Implementation Project Name
Roads & Intersections
City of Meridian 2021 Prioritization Request Form
Updates include draft FY2021-2025 IFYWP. Programming status is subject to change.
Ranking Instructions:
1. Rank your project request using only one number per project (Please avoid using 2a, 2b, 2c, etc.).
22
Item 6.
17 Ten Mile Rd and Victory Rd
Widen intersection or add roundabout in
accordance with the Master Street Map.
Traffic analysis should determine the
ultimate lane configuration based on
above projects in the area.2019-2020 2020-2021 2022-2023 Project to be built in 2022-2023.Ten Mile Rd and Victory Rd
18
Meridian Rd, McMillan Rd / Chinden
Blvd
Widen Meridian Rd to 3 lanes with curb,
gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.2023 2024 Future Project to begin design in 2023.
Meridian Rd, McMillan Rd / US 20/26 (Chinden
Blvd)
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High B44 Install Level 3 bike facilities
19
Locust Grove Rd, Ustick Rd / McMillan
Rd
Widen Locust Grove Rd to 3 lanes with
curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.Locust Grove Rd, Ustick Rd / McMillan Rd
20 Meridian Rd, Ustick Rd / McMillan Rd
Widen Meridian Rd to 3 lanes with curb,
gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.2023 2024 Future Project to begin design in 2023.Meridian Rd, Ustick Rd / McMillan Rd
21 Lake Hazel Rd and Eagle Rd
Widen and signalize intersection to 4/5
lanes on Eagle and 315 lanes on Lake in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.2020 2021-2022 2022 Project to be built in 2022.Lake Hazel Rd and Eagle Rd Discovery Park
22 Overland Rd and Linder Rd
Widen and signalize intersection to 5 lanes
on Linder Rd and 6 lanes on Overland Rd
in accordance with the 2016 CIP .
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Defer.Operating at a LOS D or better.
Reevaluate as conditions change.Overland Rd and Linder Rd
23 Ustick Rd and Black Cat Rd
Construct a dual lane roundabout in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed 2021 Interim Signal to be constructed in 2021.Ustick Rd and Black Cat Rd
24 Ustick, Black Cat to Ten Mile
Widen to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,
sidewalk, and bike lanes.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Defer.Operating at a LOS D or better.
Reevaluate as conditions change.Ustick Rd, Black Cat Rd / Ten Mile Rd
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High B56 Install Level 3 bike facilities
25 Victory, Linder to Meridian
Widen to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,
sidewalk, and bike lanes.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Defer.Operating at a LOS D or better.
Reevaluate as conditions change.Victory Rd, Linder Rd / SH 69 (Meridian Rd)
27
Franklin Rd, McDermott Rd / Black Cat
Rd
Widen Franklin Rd to 5 lanes with curb,
gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.Franklin Rd, McDermott Rd / Black Cat Rd
28 Eagle Rd / Franklin Rd Not provided
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.Eagle Rd and Franklin Rd
29 Ten Mile Rd and Amity Rd
Construct a roundabout.Project includes
bridge #205AX.2018 2019-2020 2021 Project to be built in 2021.Ten Mile Rd and Amity Rd
30 Cherry Ln and Linder Rd
Widen intersection to 4 lanes Linder Rd
and 5/6 lanes on Cherry Ln in accordance
with the 2016 CIP.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.Cherry Ln and Linder Rd
31 Cherry Ln and Black Cat Rd
Widen intersection to 5/6 lanes on Black
Cat Rd and 5 lanes on Cherry Ln in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Defer.Operating at a LOS D or better.
Reevaluate as conditions change.Cherry Ln and Black Cat Rd
32
Fairview Ave, SH 55 (Eagle Rd) /
Cloverdale Rd
Widen Fairview Ave to 7 lanes with curb,
gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Defer.Operating at a LOS D or better.
Reevaluate as conditions change.Fairview Ave, SH 55 (Eagle Rd) / Cloverdale Rd
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High B18
33
Linder Rd, Chinden Blvd (US 20/26) /
SH 44 (State St)
Widen Linder Rd in accordance with the
2016 CIP.Cross section to be determined
through concept design.Project includes
bridges #1078,#2033,#2034,#2035,and
#2036.2024-2025 Future Future Project to begin design in 2024-2025.
Linder Rd, Chinden Blvd (US 20/26) / SH 44
(State St)
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High B26
Install Level 3 Bike Facilities
on Linder Road from Chinden
Boulevard to Duck Alley Road.
This project is part of the
greater "Linder Road Bikeway
(Phase 1)" Project
34
Fairview Ave, Locust Grove Rd / SH 55
(Eagle Rd)
Widen Fairview Ave to 7 lanes with curb,
gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.2020-2021 2021-2022 2023 Project to be built in 2023.Fairview Ave, Locust Grove Rd / SH 55 (Eagle Rd)
35
Fairview Ave, Meridian Rd / Locust
Grove Rd
Widen Fairview Ave to 7 lanes with curb,
gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Defer.Operating at a LOS D or better.
Reevaluate as conditions change.Fairview Ave, Meridian Rd / Locust Grove Rd
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High B16
36 Cherry Ln, Linder Rd / Meridian Rd
Widen Cherry Ln to 5 lanes with curb,
gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Defer.Operating at a LOS D or better.
Reevaluate as conditions change.Cherry Ln, Linder Rd / Meridian Rd
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High B13
37
Fairview Ave Corridor Management,
Linder
Rd / Orchard St
Improve safety and traffic operations
along Fairview Ave in accordance with the
Fairview Avenue Corridor Management
Strategy.Project may include bicycle and
pedestrian facilities and other access
management treatments.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Project to be implemented through
development.ACHD and Meridian to coordinate
implementation as development applications are
processed.
Fairview Ave Corridor Management, Linder Rd /
Orchard St
38 Ten Mile Rd, Amity Rd / Victory Rd
Widen Ten Mile Rd to 5 lanes with curb,
gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Defer.Operating at a LOS D or better.
Reevaluate as conditions change.Ten Mile Rd, Amity Rd / Victory Rd
Idaho 69 Public
Comment
39
East 03rd St Extension, Carlton St /
Fairview Ave (Phase 2)
Extend roadway and construct streetscape
improvements,including curb,gutter,
sidewalk,and improved UPRR crossing,
from Carlton Ave to Fairview Ave in
accordance with the Downtown Meridian
Neighborhood Plan.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Defer until completion of Phase 1 (Franklin to
Carlton).East 03rd St, Carlton St / Fairview Ave (Phase 2)
40
Broadway Ave / Idaho Ave Extension,
East
06th St / Locust Grove Rd Not provided
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Defer.To be considered as properties
redevelopment.
Broadway Ave / Idaho Ave Extension, 06th St /
Locust Grove Rd
23
Item 6.
41 McMillan Rd and Black Cat Rd
Construct a multi-lane roundabout in
accordance with the 2016 CIP .
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed 2021 Interim Signal to be constructed in 2022.McMillan Rd and Black Cat Rd
42 Amity Rd and Black Cat Rd
Widen intersection to 3/4 lanes on Amity
and 314 lanes on Black Cat in accordance
with the 2016 CIP.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Defer.Operating at a LOS D or better.
Reevaluate as conditions change.Amity Rd and Black Cat Rd
43 McMillan Rd and Star Rd
Construct a multi-lane roundabout in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Defer.Operating at a LOS D or better.
Reevaluate as conditions change.McMillan Rd and Star Rd
44 Amity Rd and Linder Rd
Construct a single-lane roundabout in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Defer.Operating at a LOS D or better.
Reevaluate as conditions change.Amity Rd and Linder Rd
45 Cherry Ln and McDermott Rd
Widen intersection to 3 lanes on
McDermott and 5 lanes on Cherry.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Defer.Operating at a LOS D or better.
Reevaluate as conditions change.Cherry Ln and McDermott Rd
46 Franklin Rd and McDermott Rd
Construct a single-lane roundabout in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.2024 2025 Future Project to begin design in 2024.Franklin Rd and McDermott Rd
47 Ustick Rd and McDermott Rd
Widen intersection to 3 lanes on
McDermott and 4 lanes on Ustick in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Defer.Operating at a LOS D or better.
Reevaluate as conditions change.Ustick Rd and McDermott Rd
48 McMillan Rd and McDermott Rd
Widen and signalize intersection to 3/4
lanes on McDermott and 3 lanes on in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Defer.Operating at a LOS D or better.
Reevaluate as conditions change.McMillan Rd and McDermott Rd
49 Ustick Rd and Star Rd
Construct a single-lane roundabout in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Defer.Operating at a LOS D or better.
Reevaluate as conditions change.Ustick Rd and Star Rd
50 Ten Mile Rd and Chateau Dr Signalize intersection.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Does not currently meet warrants.ACHD to
reevaluate as development occurs in the area.Ten Mile Rd and Chateau Dr
51 Lake Hazel Rd and Locust Grove Rd
Construct a single-lane roundabout in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Defer.Operating at a LOS D or better.
Reevaluate as conditions change.Lake Hazel Rd and Locust Grove Rd Discovery Park
52 Amity Rd and Locust Grove Rd
Widen and signalize intersection to 3/4
lanes on Locust Grove and 5/6 lanes on
Amity in accordance with the 2016 CIP .
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed 2023 Interim signal to be constructed in 2023.Amity Rd and Locust Grove Rd Discovery Park
53 Victory Rd and Linder Rd
Construct a single-lane roundabout in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Defer.Operating at a LOS D or better.
Reevaluate as conditions change.Victory Rd and Linder Rd
54
Locust Grove Rd, McMillan Rd /
Chinden
Blvd (US 20/26)
Widen Locust Grove Rd to 3 lanes with
curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Defer.Operating at a LOS D or better.
Reevaluate as conditions change.
Locust Grove Rd, McMillan Rd / US 20/26
(Chinden Blvd)
55
Ustick Rd, McDermott Rd / Black Cat
Rd
Widen Ustick Rd to 5 lanes with curb,
gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Defer.Operating at a LOS D or better.
Reevaluate as conditions change.Ustick Rd, McDermott Rd / Black Cat Rd
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High
B55 /
S18
Install Level 3 bike facilities
and Connect gaps from
existing sidewalk on both
sides of Ustick
56 Pine, Linder to Meridian
Widen to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,
sidewalks and/or multi-use or mixed-use
bikeway.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.Pine Ave, Linder Rd / Meridian Rd
57 Eagle Rd / Fairview Ave Not provided
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.Eagle Rd and Fairview Ave
58 Lake Hazel / Discovery Park
Intersection improvements requested at
entrance to Discovery Park.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.Lake Hazel Rd and Discovery Park Discovery Park
59 Amity, Eagle to Cloverdale
Widen to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,
sidewalk, and bike lanes. TBD
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.Amity Rd, Eagle Rd / Cloverdale Rd.
60 Amity, Locust Grove to Eagle TBD
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.Amity Rd, Locust Grove Rd / Eagle Rd
61 Victory, Ten Mile to Linder TBD
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.Victory Rd, Ten Mile Rd / Linder Rd
62 Black Cat, Cherry to Ustick TBD
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.Blact Cat Rd, Cherry Ln / Ustick Rd
63 Black Cat, Franklin to Cherry TBD
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.Blact Cat Rd, Franklin Rd / Cherry Ln
64 Black Cat, Ustick to McMillan TBD
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.Black Cat Rd, Ustick Rd / McMillan Rd
65 Black Cat, McMillan to Chinden TBD
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.
Black Cat Rd, McMillan Rd / US 20/26 (Chinden
Blvd)
66 McMillan, Black Cat to Ten Mile TBD
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.McMillan Rd, Black Cat Rd / Ten Mile Rd
67 McMillan, Ten Mile to Linder TBD
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.McMillan Rd, Ten Mile Rd / Linder Rd
68 Eagle, Lake Hazel to Amity TBD 2021 2022 2023 Project to be built in 2023.Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
69 Locust Grove, Lake Hazel to Amity TBD. 3-lane?
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.Locust Grove Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd Parks/Schools
68 26
Eagle Rd and Amity Rd Roundabout
(Dual Lane)
Widen roundabout to a dual lane
roundabout,with curb,gutter,sidewalk,
and bike lanes.Project to be constructed
concurrently with Eagle Rd,Amity Rd /
Victory Rd.2020 2020 2021-2022 Project to be built in 2021-2022.Eagle Rd and Amity Rd Roundabout (Dual Lane)Discovery Park
69 5 Eagle Rd, Amity Rd / Victory Rd
Widen Eagle Rd to 5 lanes with curb,
gutter,sidewalk and bike lanes in
accordance with the 2016 CIP.2018 2019-2020 2021-2022 Project to be built in 2021-2022.Eagle Rd, Amity Rd / Victory Rd Discovery Park
24
Item 6.
1
Locust Grove Rd, Overland Rd / Puffin
St
Construct a detached asphalt or concrete
pathway on east side of Locust Grove
between Puffin Stand Overland Rd.2019 2020-2021 2022 Project to be built in 2022.Locust Grove Rd, Victory Rd / Overland Rd
2
Stoddard Rd, Victory Rd / Overland Rd
(Stoddard Rd, Victory Rd / Kodiak Dr)
Reconstruct Stoddard Rd,between Victory
Rd and Overland Rd to 3-lanes,7'attached
sidewalks and bike lanes.Project includes
bridge #2085 and an enhanced pedestrian
crossing (pedestrian hybrid beacon)at
Victory and Stoddard (CM214-27).Bike
lanes may be replaced by a pathway per
the Bike Master Plan Update.2022 2023 2024 Project to be built in 2024.Stoddard Rd, Victory Rd / Overland Rd
3
East 03rd St, Franklin Rd / Carlton Ave
(Phase 1)
Construct streetscape improvements,
including curb,gutter,sidewalk,and
improved UPRR crossing,from Franklin Rd
to Carlton Ave in accordance with the
Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Plan.2022 2023 2025 Projects to be built in 2025.East 03rd St, Franklin Rd / Carlton St
4
Broadway Ave, West 07th St / West
04th St
Complete sidewalks on the south side of
Broadway Ave,between West 07th St and
West 04th St.2024 2025 Future Project to begin design in 2024.Broadway Ave, West 08th St / West 04th St
5 McMillan Rd, Ten Mile Rd / Linder Rd
Install extruded curb pathway on north
side of McMillan Rd between Cortona Way
and Goddard Creek Way and detached
concrete sidewalk with curbing between
Goddard Creek Way and Wild Goose Way.2024 2025 Future Project to begin design in 2024.McMillan Rd, Ten Mile Rd / Linder Rd
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High S14
Connect gaps from existing
sidewalk on the north and
south sides
6 Stockenham Enhanced Cross-walks
Remove mid-block cross-walk by Hillsdale
and add enhanced cross-walks at Lachlan
and near Rockhampton/Hill Park St.
Update school zone signs and flashers.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.
Hillsdale Elementary Pedestrian Crossings and
School Zone
7
East 2 1/2 St, Carlton Ave / Fairview
Ave
Install sidewalk on the west and/or east
side.2024 2025 Future Project to begin design in 2024.02nd 1/2 St, Carlton Ave / Fairview Ave
8 Capulet Way at Siena Elementary
Install crosswalk of Capulet Way on the
west side of Siena Elementary school
micro path.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.
Capulet Way Pedestrian Crossing (S/O Falcon
Dr)
9
Main St and King Street Pedestrian
Crossing
Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing of
Main St at King Street.2024 2024 2025 Project to be built in 2025.Main St and Williams St Pedestrian Crossing
10
McMillan Rd and Palantine Way
Pedestrian Crossing
Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing
and curb ramps on McMillan Rd at
Palantine Way.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.
McMillan Rd and Palantine Way Pedestrian
Crossing
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High C3
11 Meridian Rail-with-Trail Multi-use pathway along rail road tracks.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
ACHD to prioritize and scope arterial crossings
when City moves pathway project forward.Meridian Rail-with-Trail Parks
12
Locust Grove Rd and Woodbridge Dr
Pedestrian Crossing
Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing of
Locust Grove Rd at Woodbridge Dr or
Watertower St.2023 2023 2024 Project to be built in 2024.
Locust Grove Rd and Woodbridge Dr Pedestrian
Crossing C9
13 Eagle Rd, River Valley St / Ustick Rd
Complete sidewalks on Eagle Rd,between
River Valley Stand Ustick Rd.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed ITD facility. ACHD to share request with ITD.Eagle Rd, River Valley St / Ustick Rd
14 E. 3rd Carlton to Fairview
Extend roadway and construct streetscape
improvements,including curb,gutter,
sidewalk,and improved UPRR crossing,
from Carlton Ave to Fairview Ave in
accordance with the Downtown Meridian
Neighborhood Plan.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.East 03rd St, Carlton St / Fairview Ave (Phase 2)
15 Washington St, W. 07th St / Main St
Complete sidewalk on Washington St,
between W. 07th Stand Main St.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.Washington St, 07th St / Main St
16 Taconic Dr / Pioneer
Install crosswalk at intersection of Taconic
and Pioneer (Hillsdale Subdivision).
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.
Taconic Dr and Pioneer Trail Ave Pedestrian
Crossing
17
Amity and Mary McPherson
Elementary School Pedestrian Signal Signalized pedestrian crossing.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Scoped "Go -Defer"in 2017 due to low
pedestrian volumes.ACHD to reevaluate as
conditions change in the area.
Amity Rd and Mary McPherson Elementary
School Pedestrian Crossing Schools
18
Pine Ave and W. 1st St Pedestrian
Crossing
Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing
(rectangular rapid flashing beacon)on
Pine Ave at W 01st St to improve access to
Meridian Elementary School.2025 2025 Future Project to begin design in 2025.Pine Ave and 01st St Pedestrian Crossing
19
Washington Stand W 1st St Pedestrian
Crossing
Pedestrian crossing near Meridian
Elementary School.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Evaluation completed fall 2016 shows existing
crossing meet needs of current users.ACHD to
reevaluate as conditions change.Washington St and 01st St Pedestrian Crossing
Community Programs
25
Item 6.
20 Bower St, Meridian Rd / E. 03rd St
Complete sidewalks and add wayfinding
signage on Bower St,between Meridian
Rd and E. 03rd St.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.Bower St, Meridian Rd / 03rd St
21
McMillan Rd, Locust Grove Rd / Red
Horse Way
Complete sidewalk on the north side of
McMillan Rd,between Locust Grove Rd
and Red Horse Way.2024 2025 Future Project to begin design in 2024.McMillan Rd, Red Horse Way / Locust Grove Rd
22 Linder Rd, 1-84 / Franklin Rd
Complete sidewalks the west side on
Linder Rd, between 1-84 and Franklin Rd.Future Future Future
Project added to IFYWP for discussion
purposes.ACHD to coordinate with ITD on
request.Project to move forward when
funding partnership is possible.Linder Rd, Overland Rd / Franklin Rd
23 Linder Rd, Washington St / Maple St
Complete sidewalk on the west side of
Linder Rd,between Washington St and
Maple St.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Complete pedestrian facilities existing in this
section.Linder Rd, Washington St / Maple St
24
Victory Rd, Glacier Bay Way / Mesa
Way
Complete sidewalk on the south side
adjacent to county parcel.2023 2024 2025 Project to be built in 2025.
Victory Rd, SH 69 (Meridian Rd) / Locust Grove
Rd
25
Locust Grove Rd and Palermo Dr
Pedestrian Signal
Install an enhanced pedestrian signal and
lighting on the north side of Palermo at
Locust Grove.2022 2022 2023 Project to be built in 2023.
Locust Grove Rd and Palermo Dr Pedestrian
Crossing Discovery Park
26
W 08th St and Meridian Middle School
Pedestrian Crossing
Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing on
8th St at Meridian Middle School.2020 2020 2021 Project to be built in 2021.
Enhanced School Crossings - Meridian Middle
School and Capital High School
27 Meridian, north of Ustick
Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing of
Meridian Rd at/near Settlers Park
entrance and Sundance Subdivision
micropath.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.
Meridian Rd Pedestrian Crossings (Settlers Park
Entrance / Sundance Sub Micropath)
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High C7
Install an enhanced
pedestrian crossing of
Meridian Road near Settlers
Park entrance and Sundance
Subdivision micropath
28 Chinden Blvd, east of Ten Mile Rd
Complete sidewalks on Chinden Blvd,east
of Ten Mile Rd.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed ITD facility. ACHD to share request with ITD.Chinden Blvd, E/O Ten Mile Rd
29
Locust Grove Rd and Time Zone Dr
Pedestrian Crossing
Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing of
Locust Grove Rd at Time Zone Dr.2019 2020-2021 2022 Project to be built in 2022.Locust Grove Rd, Victory Rd / Overland Rd
30 Taormina Drive at Maesaia Way
Install sidewalk on south side of Taormina
Drive near Maesaia Way.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.Taormina Dr at Maesaia Way
31 Woodbridge Neighborhood Bike Study
Study the connectivity and bikeability of
the Woodbridge neighborhood.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
ACHD to evaluate as part of future budgeting
efforts.Woodbridge Neighborhood Bike Study
32 Watertower St at Rebound School
Install a painted crosswalk on Watertower
St at Rebound School.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
ACHD Traffic Engineering does not recommend
installation.Crossing activity is caused by parent
drop off.
Watertower St and Rebound School Pedestrian
Crossing School
33
Linder Rd, Chateau Dr / Barbara
Morgan STEM Way finding signage on Linder.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
ACHD Traffic believes current signage is
adequate. No additional signage recommended.Linder Rd, Chateau Dr / Barber Morgan STEM
34 St. Ignatius School Pedestrian Signal
Pedestrian signal on Meridian Road at
Producer.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.
Meridian Rd and Producer Dr Pedestrian
Crossing
35 Bridgetower Pedestrian Signal
Pedestrian signal on Ustick Road at
Bridgetower (Towerbridge?) Drive.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.
Ustick Rd and Towerbridge Way Pedestrian
Crossing
36 Fairview Terrace to Chief Joseph
Pedestrian connection (sidewalk)between
Barbara Drive in Fairview Terrace Park to
E.Willowbrook Drive and Chief Joseph
Elementary on Chateau Drive.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
ACHD to support City led effort.Coonection
would be located on private property.Barbara Dr Pedestrian Connection
37 Amity, Eagle to Hillsdale
Pedestrian improvements on Amity to the
YMCA and City Park.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
To be evaluated and prioritized for possible
inclusion into future IFYWP updates.Amity Rd, Eagle Rd / Cloverdale Rd.
38 West 02nd St, UPRR / Broadway Ave
Complete sidewalk on both sides of West
02nd,between the Union Pacific Railroad
and Broadway Ave to address parking
concerns in this area.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Sidewalk scoped "No Go"in 2015.Agencies to
coordinate if other solutions identified.West 02nd, UPRR / Broadway Ave
40
Kentucky Ridge Way, Riodosa Dr /
Victory Rd
Sidewalk on the west side of Kentucky
Ridge Way, between Victory and Riodosa.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Scoped "Go -Defer"in 2015.Sidewalk exists on
the east side.ACHD to reevaluate if existing
sidewalk does not meet needs in area.Kentucky Way, Riodosa Dr / Victory Rd
41 State Ave, East 2nd St / Cathy Ln
Sidewalk repair.Requested by land owner
in this area.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Scoped "No Go"in 2015.This section has
connectivity already on the south side and the
original requestor no longer owns the property.State Ave, 2nd St / Cathy Ln
42
Nola Rd and Crossroads Middle School
Pedestrian Crossing
Install a painted crosswalk on Nola Rd at
Crossroads Middle School.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Scoped "No Go"in 2018 as issues are caused by
drop-off activities.Encourage school to work
with parents.
Nola Rd and Crossroads Middle School
Pedestrian Crossing
43
Nola Rd, south of Pine Ave Middle
School
Construct sidewalk on the east side of
Nola Rd from Pine Ave to Crossroads.
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Not
Programmed
Scoped "No Go"in 2018.Sidewalk on east side to
be built through development. Nola Rd, Pine Ave / Crossroads Middle School
NEW Amity, Meridian to Locust Grove pedestrian improvements Parks/Schools
NEW
Black Cat-Ten Mile Bikeway, Cherry
Lane / Ustick Road
Install Level 1 bike facilities along the Black
Cat-Ten Mike Bikeway
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High B7
NEW
Central Meridian Bikeway, Blue Heron
Street / Chinden Boulevard
Install Level 1 bike facilities along the
Central Meridian Bikeway from Blue
Heron Street to Chinden Boulevard
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High B10
26
Item 6.
NEW
Chinden-McMillan Bikeway, Ten Mile
Road / Sedona Drive
Install Level 1 and Level 3 bike facilities
along the Chinden-McMillan Bikeway from
Ten Mile Road to Sedona Drive
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High B14
NEW
Gondola-Malta Bikeway, Black Cat
Road / Goddard Creek Way Install Level 1 and Level 3 bike facilities
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High B21
NEW
Granger Avenue Bikeway, Records
Avenue / Cloverdale Road Install Level 1 bike facilities
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High B20
NEW Lake Hazel Rd, Locust Grove to Eagle pedestrian improvements Parks/Schools
NEW
Linder Road, Maple Avenue / Cherry
Lane Install Level 3 bike facilities
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High B24
NEW
Linder-Meridian Bikeway, Cherry Lane
/ Chinden Boulevard Install Level 1 and Level 3 bike facilities
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High B22
NEW
Locust Grove Road and Heritage Park
Street
Install an enhanced crossing (pedestrian
hybrid beacon)on Locust Grove Road at
Heritage Park Street,access for Meridian
Technical Charter High School
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High C10
NEW
Locust Grove Road, Leighfield Drive to
Star Lane
Connect gap from existing sidewalk on
west side of Locust Grove Road, along with
improving narrow sidewalk on east side of
roadway
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High S8
NEW
Locust Grove-Eagle Bikeway, Pine
Avenue / McMillan Road Install Level 1 and Level 3 bike facilities
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High B27
NEW
McDermott Road, Ustick Road to
McMillan Road
Install sidewalk on the west side of
McDermott Road connecting to sidewalk
on Ustick Road and McMillan Road for
connectivity to Owyhee High School
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High S10
NEW
McMillan-Ustick Bikeway, Cool River
Avenue / Eagle Road Install Level 1 bike facilities
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High B42
NEW
Records Avenue, Florence Drive /
Fairview Avenue
Install Level 2 bike facilities with
construction ot improved roadway
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High B46
NEW
Records Way Bikeway, Pine Avenue /
Fernside Drive
Install Level 1 bike facilities along the
Records Way Bikeway from Pine Avenue
to Florence Drive,Level 2 bike facilities
from to Ustick Road to Baldcypress Street,
and Level 1 bike facilities from Baldcypress
Street to Wainwright Drive
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High B47
NEW
Ten Mile-Linder Bikeway, Linder Road
/ Chinden Boulevard
Install signing and pavement marking to
existing Level 1 and Level 3 bike facilities
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High B50
NEW Ustick Road and Venable Lane
Install an enhanced crossing (pedestrian
hybrid beacon)
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High C5
NEW
Ustick-Cherry Bikeway, Black Cat Road
/ Chateau Drive Install Level 1 bike facilities
North Meridian
Bike/Ped High B52
REMOVE 39
Locust Grove Rd, Paradise Ln / Grand
Canyon Dr
Asphalt path on the east side of Locust
Grove Rd to connect with an existing path
to the school.Completed Completed Completed
Asphalt pathway with extruded curb exists on
the east side of Locust Grove Rd.Project
completed in 2010.Locust Grove Rd, Paradise Ln / Grand Canyon Dr
27
Item 6.
TEN MILE RDFRANKLIN RD
AMITY RD
KUNA MORA RDBLACK CAT RDSTATE ST
LINDER RDHILL RD
MERIDIAN RDFAIRVIEW AVE
COLUMBIA RD
KING RD
PINE AVE
FEDERAL WAY
GOWEN RD
USTICK RD
PLEASANT VALLEY RDBOISE AVE
MAPLE GROVE RDBEACON LIGHT RD
LAKE HAZEL RD BOGUS BASIN RDDEER FLAT RD
CHERRY LN
EAGLE RDSWAN FALLS RDCHINDEN BLVD
CURTIS RDTENMILE CREEK RD
FLOATING FEATHER RD
VISTA AVEEMERALD STCAN ADA RDMITCHELL STWARM SPRI
NGS AVEMILWAUKEE STE
I
S
E
N
MA
N
R
DCOLLISTER DRSEAMAN GULCH RDDRY CREE K R D
GARY LNWI
LLOW CREEK RDLOCUST GROVE RDGREENHURST RDNEW HOPE RD
STAR RDPIERCE PARK LNOVERLAND RD
ORCHARD STMCMILLAN RD
KUNA RD
WARM SPRINGS AVE
HUBBARD RD EAGLE RDCHINDEN BLVD
MCDERMOTT RDFIVE MILE RDSTATE ST
LINDER RDCOLE RDLINDER RD15TH ST9TH STFORT ST
IDAHO ST
MYRTLE ST
FRONT ST 6TH ST5TH ST16TH STJEFFERSON ST
CAPITOL BLVDAMERICANA BLVDFRONT ST
PARK BLVD
R E S E R V E S T
1ST STWALNUT STAVENUE BMAIN ST
WARM SPRINGS AVE
D r a f t E x i s t i n g P M P e a k H o u r L O S M a pDraft E x i s t i n g P M P e a k H o u r L O S M a p
B o i s e D o w n t o w nBoise D o w n t o w n
Legend
Level of Service - Intersection C or Better D E FLevel of Service - RoadwayD or betterEF
D e c e m b e r 2 0 2 0December 2 0 2 0
28
Item 6.
;;
;;
;
;
;
;
;
;;
;
;
;
;;
;
;;;;
;
;
;
;
;;;
;;;
;;
;;
;;
;
;
;
;
;;
;;
;
;
;
;
;
;;
;
;
;
;;
;
;;;;
;
;
;
;
;;;
;;;
;;
;;
;;
;
;
;
;
MCMILLAN
MERIDIANLOCUST GROVEPINE
VICTORY
HUBBARD
OVERLAND
FRANKLINLINDER MAINCOLUMBIA
AMITYHWY 16EAGLELAKE HAZEL CLOVERDALEUSTICK
BLACK CATMCDERMOTTTEN MILECHINDEN
CAN ADASTARHWY 55§¨¦84
£¤16
£¤26
¬«69
¬«55
¬«44
§¨¦84 §¨¦84
4
16
22
23
29 26
3031
17
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
2151
52
53
12
13
28
57
58
1
15
5
6
14
7
3
19
10
9
2
8
20
18
27
32
33
343536 37
38
39
40
54
55
11
56
24
25
60
69
59
61
62
63
64
65
66 67
68
2020 Roadway & Intersection Priorities [
Print Date: 12/29/2020
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3Miles
The information shown on this map is compiled from various sources
and is subject to constant revision. The City of Meridian makes no
warranty or guarantee as to the content, accuracy, timeliness, or
completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal
responsibility for the information contained on this map.
Legend
Future Roads
Area of Impact
Roadway Priorities;
Intersection Priorities
29
Item 6.
MCMILLAN
CHERRY
MERIDIANLOCUST GROVEPINE
OVERLAND
FRANKLINLINDER
LAKE HAZELMAINFAIRVIEW
AMITY CLOVERDALEEAGLEUSTICK
TEN MILEMCDERMOTTBLACK CATVICTORY
CHINDEN
§¨¦84
£¤16
£¤26
¬«69
¬«55
¬«55 §¨¦84§¨¦84
21
1
2
34
5
11
7
38
8
10
12
13
40
16
17
18
19
20
22
41
23
24
15
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
4243
32
33
34
35
36
6
9
14
37
21
1
2
34
5
11
7
38
8
10
12
13
40
16
17
18
19
20
22
41
23
24
15
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
4243
32
33
34
35
36
6
9
14
37
21
1
2
34
5
11
7
38
8
10
12
13
40
16
17
18
19
20
22
41
23
24
15
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
4243
32
33
34
35
36
6
9
14
37
Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS,
USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community
2020 Community Program Priorities [Legend
Area of Impact
Future Roads
Community Programs
Print Date: 12/30/2020
The information shown on this map is compiled from various sources
and is subject to constant revision. The City of Meridian makes no
warranty or guarantee as to the content, accuracy, timeliness, or
completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal
responsibility for the information contained on this map.
0 0.5 1 1.5 2Miles
30
Item 6.
MEMO TO TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Agenda Topic on the Transportation Commission Agenda
From: Miranda Carson, Coordination Planner Meeting Date: January 4, 2021
Presenter: David Ballard Estimated Time: 10 minutes
Topic: Project Review Subcommittee Update
David Ballard will be giving a brief overview of the items discussed at the most recent Project
Review Subcommittee meeting. The meeting, scheduled for January 4th, 2:15pm, followed the
agenda below.
Agenda:
I. Roll:
_ David Ballard
_ Tracy Hopkins
_ Toni Tisdale
_ Shawn Martin
II. Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel to Amity
III. Future Topics
IV. Next Meeting
31
Item 7.
MEMO TO TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Agenda Topic on the Transportation Commission Agenda
From: Miranda Carson, Coordination Planner Meeting Date: January 4, 2021
Presenter: Miranda Carson Estimated Time: 15 minutes
Topic: Eagle Road, Lake Hazel to Amity Scope of Work Discussion
Eagle Road, Lake Hazel to Amity is a new project programmed for design to occur in FY21. Project
consists of widening Eagle Rd from Lake Hazel to Amity with improvements at the intersection of
Taconic and Eagle. Project scope statement initially has a multi roundabout assumed at this
intersection. You will notice the scope has traffic analysis at this intersection to look at
roundabout/signal.
Please review and provide any feedback or recommendations that should be shared with ACHD.
Recommendations or approval of the project will be shared with Council who will communicate
those to ACHD.
Attached is the draft scope of work and project initiation form.
32
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 1 of 26
SCOPE OF WORK
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
ACHD Project No. 521043
ACHD GIS No. RD216-04
November 19, 2020
Project Description
This project is currently programmed for right-of-way in FY 2022 and construction in FY 2023.
The proposed project improvements consist of reconstruction of Eagle Road from Lake Hazel
Road to Amity Road (approximately 4500 ft in length). The anticipated improvements will
consist of the following:
• The project will widen Eagle Road from two/three lanes to five lanes with curb and gutter
and multi-use pathway and / or elevated bikeway, (Level 3 bike facilities to be
determined as the design progresses). The existing pedestrian hybrid beacon at Eagle and
Taconic Dr will be removed and enhanced pedestrian crossings will be incorporated into
the intersection design (roundabout or signalized).
• Installation of a multilane roundabout at the intersection of Eagle Road and Taconic
Drive
• Install intersection lighting for the full extents of the project limits, continuous light will
not be required.
• Install fiber optic interconnect for the full extents of the project limits
• Infiltration and/or retention/detention facilities are anticipated to be designed to treat and
dispose of storm flows generated by the project improvements.
• Existing irrigation will be perpetuated with pipe crossings replaced to meet current
standards.
• Relocate existing school zone flashers at Eagle Rd and Taconic Dr as needed to
accommodate the widening of Eagle Road.
• It is assumed there are not mid-block pedestrian crossings to be installed within the
project limits and would be completed as a supplemental to this scope of work.
• A pavement life-cycle cost analysis will not be conducted. It is assumed the geotechnical
field work will consist of one to three borings in the existing roadway (depending on the
geotechnical data available from previous ACHD projects), two perc test and the
installation of two piezometers. It is assumed this project will also utilize the existing
geotechnical/materials reports completed for the adjoining design projects to the north
and south on Eagle Road. Reports to be provided by ACHD.
• An intersection traffic analysis will be completed as part of 30% design for the
intersection of Eagle Road and Taconic Dr (roundabout or signalized); but prior to
developing the 30% roadway and intersection design and displays, to ensure the 30%
design represents the approved intersection control. This scope of work assumed a
multilane roundabout will be designed if a traffic signal is selected as the performed
alternative it will be completed as a supplemental to this scope of work.
33
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 2 of 26
• A storm water alternative analysis will be prepared as part of 30% design but prior to
developing the 30% roadway and intersection design and displays, to ensure the 30%
design represents the project team approved storm water alternative.
• The 30% design will confirm the currently constructed structure for Ten Mile Creek has
adequate width to construct the proposed roadway section. If it is determined the
structure will need to be modified, that task will be completed as a supplemental to this
scope of work by a Structural Engineer Subconsultant.
• ADA facilities will remain open during construction. Both traffic and pedestrian phasing
plans will be required in the plan set.
• The current posted speed limit on Eagle Road is 45 mph the proposed corridor speed
limit will be lowered to 40 MPH with the construction of this project.
• Scope of Work includes 20 utility potholes.
• It is assumed a 404 permit will be required for this project. This scope of work assumes a
total of two (2) ACHD reviews and revisions, additional review submittals and revisions
will be completed as a supplemental to this scope of work and will prepared in
conjunction with the intersection project 404 permitting.
• Public involvement will consist of 2 PIM's; after 30% and after 75%.
• Consultant will create crash history displays and compile comments into a matrix from
the PIM. The Consultant to include in the Scope of Work one-on-one meetings with
individual property owners. The Consultant will also create displays with aerials showing
the proposed improvements.
• In the interest of time, the 30% design submittal will be based on ACHD provided aerials
and GIS linework. The outcome of the meeting will be to ensure the direction of the
design meets the proposed purpose and need of the project before proceeding to 75%
design submittal.
• It is understood by all parties that if winter weather (snow) delays the field work required
to complete the topographic survey, the 99% design submittal date may need to be
extended and will be determined at a future date based on the extent of delay.
• This project will coordinate with the current Eagle Rd and Lake Hazel intersection in
house design project (319050).
• This project will also connect to the Eagle Rd and Amity Rd Roundabout expansion
project awarded to Central Paving Company (320036); and is slated to begin construction
November 2020. It is anticipated that additional topo and minor modification maybe
necessary to adjust the design to match the as constructed roadway horizontal and vertical
elements once the roundabout is constructed. The level of effort is unknow at this time
and will be determined as the construction progresses. Additional work to modify the
Eagle Road design due to as constructed will be completed as a supplemental to this
scope of work based on the degree of changes.
• It is assumed ACHD will make available all design files associated with projects 319050
and 320036 to Precision for use in matching the north and south project limits.
• This scope of work assumes the central island landscape and pressure irrigation design
will be completed by others (City of Meridian, Neighborhood Association, etc).
34
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 3 of 26
Precision Engineering, LLC, herein called the Consultant, will design the project and supply
documentation in accordance with this scope of work, the current version of the ISPWC
specifications with the current ISPWC updates as amended by ACHD adopted supplements,
including the ACHD Supplemental Traffic Provisions.
Precision will be responsible for Project Management, roadway and intersection design,
preparation of plans, specifications, and estimate for traffic signal design including ITS
components, intersection lighting, intersection traffic analysis and geometrics, all project signing
and striping, advanced traffic control and traffic control phasing plans.
Civil Survey Consultants, Inc (CSC), herein called the Subconsultant, will be responsible for
completing the Survey tasks under Section 3.0, hydraulic analysis, preparing the SWPPP, 404
Permitting and all storm drain and gravity irrigation components of the project.
Terracon herein called the Subconsultant, will lead all geotechnical components of the project as
outlined under Section 4.2.
TAG Historic Research herein called the Subconsultant, will lead all cultural research
components of the project as outlined under Section 4.5.
L2 Data Collections herein called the Subconsultant, will lead the intersection traffic counts
(two-day 24 hour and AM / PM peak hour counts) as outlined under Section 4.4.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SCOPE OF WORK ....................................................................... 1
Definitions and Acronyms .......................................................... 4
Implied Terms .............................................................................. 5
Coordination of Scope of Work ................................................. 5
1.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS ..................................................... 6
1.1 Progress Meetings ........................................................................................................... 6
1.2 Project Administration .................................................................................................... 6
1.3 ACHD Standards ............................................................................................................ 7
2.0 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ...................................................... 7
2.1 Outreach .......................................................................................................................... 7
2.2 Public Meetings .............................................................................................................. 8
3.0 LOCATION SURVEYING AND MAPPING ........................... 9
3.1 Existing Surface DTM .................................................................................................. 10
4.0 30% DESIGN ...................................................................... 11
4.1 Concept Intersection and Roadway Design .................................................................. 11
4.2 Geotechnical Investigation ............................................................................................ 11
4.3 Hydraulic/Stormwater Design ...................................................................................... 14
4.4 Traffic (Intersection of Eagle Rd and Taconic Dr) ....................................................... 15
35
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 4 of 26
4.5 Environmental Evaluation ............................................................................................ 16
4.6 30% Design Submittal .................................................................................................. 17
4.7 30% Review Meeting (Working Meeting) ................................................................... 18
5.0 75% DESIGN ...................................................................... 18
5.1 75% Intersection and Roadway Design ........................................................................ 18
5.2 75% Hydraulic / Stormwater Design ............................................................................ 19
5.3 75% Gravity Irrigation .................................................................................................. 19
5.4 75% Traffic Signal Design (RRFBs at Roundabout) .................................................... 19
5.5 75% Intersection Lighting and Interconnect Design .................................................... 19
5.6 75% Signing and Pavement Markings .......................................................................... 19
5.7 75% Temporary Traffic Control ................................................................................... 19
5.8 75% Pedestrian Detour Plan ......................................................................................... 19
5.9 75% Right-of-Way ........................................................................................................ 19
5.10 75% Utility Coordination .............................................................................................. 19
5.11 Utility Potholing............................................................................................................ 20
5.12 75% Quantities and Construction Cost Estimate .......................................................... 20
5.13 75% Design Submittal .................................................................................................. 20
5.14 75% Review Meeting .................................................................................................... 21
6.0 95% DESIGN ...................................................................... 22
6.1 Intersection and Roadway Design ................................................................................ 22
6.2 95% Design Submittal .................................................................................................. 22
6.3 95% Review Meeting .................................................................................................... 24
7.0 99% DESIGN ...................................................................... 24
7.1 Finalize Plans for Right of Way Acquisition ................................................................ 24
8.0 100% BID DOCUMENTS .................................................... 25
9.0 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING ..................................... 26
General
Consistent with professional standard of care, Consultant shall provide management,
coordination and direction to project team and sub-consultants to complete project deliverables
on time and within budget.
Definitions and Acronyms
404 Permit – Section 404 of the Clean Water Act which addresses permits for dredged or fill
material in Waters of the US, administered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
AASHTO – American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
ACHD – Ada County Highway District
ADT – Average Daily Traffic count
Agreement Administrator – The ACHD Project manager is responsible for administering the
contract and overseeing the design.
CAC – Community Advisory Committee
CAD – Computer Aided Design
COMPASS – Community Planning Association of SW Idaho
36
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 5 of 26
CPM – Critical Path Method
CSS – Context Sensitive Solutions
FHWA – Federal Highway Administration
EPA – Environmental Protection Agency
GIS – Geographic Information System
GSI – Green Stormwater Infrastructure
Holidays – ACHD recognized holidays occur on: New Year’s Day, Presidents’ Day, Memorial
Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, Friday after
Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve, and Christmas Day.
ITD - Idaho Transportation Department
Man-Hour – Hour(s) of time required for an individual to complete an itemized task designated
by the project scope of work. Personnel functions shall be rounded up to the nearest Man-Hour.
MOU – Memorandum of Understanding
NEPA – National Environmental Policy Act
PIM – Public Involvement Meeting
PMG – Project Management Guide
PSA – Professional Service Agreement, or Professional Agreement. This is a written agreement
or contract between ACHD and the Prime Consultant
Prime Consultant – The firm contracting with ACHD, for the performance of work prescribed
in the contract.
Project Manager – (Also abbreviated as “PM”). The ACHD point of contact for the project.
ROW – Right of Way
SHPO – State Historic Preservation Office
Study Area – The expanded area of influence generated by the project area.
Sub-Consultant – Who the prime Consultant sublets part(s) of the design contract.
SOW – Scope of Work
SWPPP – Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
Implied Terms
In order to avoid confusing repetition of expressions in this Scope of Work, it is provided that
whenever anything is to be required, directed, specified, authorized, furnished, given, designated,
permitted, reserved, approved, disapproved, accepted, or rejected, it shall be understood as if the
expression were followed by the words “by the Project Manager” or ”to the Project Manager”
Whenever anything is to be performed, designed, computed, calculated, analyzed, determined,
evaluated, surveyed, obtained, established, contacted, estimated, investigated, prepared,
developed, delivered, collected, and/or recorded, it shall be understood as if the expression were
followed by the words “by the Consultant (either prime or sub)” or ”to the Consultant (either
prime or sub).”
Coordination of Scope of Work
The Scope of Work and Professional Services Agreement are essential parts of the project, and a
requirement occurring in one is as binding as though occurring in all. They are intended to be
complementary and to describe and provide for a complete package.
37
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 6 of 26
Checkpoints or milestones have been established at various stages that require approval of
specific project information. These checkpoints are:
Assuming an NTP of December 10, 2020 for the following submittal dates:
30% Design Review Submitted on March 5, 2021
50% Design Review Not Required
75% Design Review Submitted on June 11, 2021
95% Design Review Submitted on August 20, 2021
99% Design (Right of Way Plans) Submitted on September 30, 2021
100% Bid Documents
1.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS
1.1 Progress Meetings
Products and Deliverables
• Kick-Off Meeting
• Milestones Meetings and Agendas
• Draft Meeting Minutes/Summary
• Final Meeting Minutes/Summary
ACHD Responsibilities
• Schedule and provide facility for progress meetings
• Review and approve summary and action items
Assumptions
• The project is expected to be (10) months in duration
• Four (4) meetings are assumed and additional meetings must be approved by ACHD
• ACHD will review and approve summary within one week
• Action items will be completed by due date
1.2 Project Administration
Products and Deliverables
• Time-scaled logic diagram (Gantt Chart), updated monthly and submitted with monthly
invoicing
• Monthly Project Status Report (updated monthly and included with invoice)
• Earned Value Report
• Invoice (PDF emailed to invoices@achdidaho.org) which includes a table on the first
page dividing total invoice amount into project sub-numbers based on these percentages:
o 521043.001 – Roadway – 70%
o 521043.002 – Intersection – 30%
38
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 7 of 26
ACHD Responsibilities
• Review and approve Schedule, Invoice and Monthly Project Status Report
1.3 ACHD Standards
All projects shall follow the ACHD Policy Manual. Refer to section 3004 ROADWAY
DESIGN STANDARDS. Where both minimum and desirable values are provided, every
reasonable effort shall be made to achieve the desirable standards. Any design exception must be
approved by ACHD in writing. The roadway widths adopted by ACHD and identified on the
Master Street Map shall serve as the basis for beginning evaluation. If the proposed width or
other standard is less than ACHD standards, it must be documented, justified, and approved by
ACHD.
Additionally, the following standards shall be used:
• ACHD Livable Street Design Guide
• Ada County Master Streets Map
• ACHD Complete Streets Policy
• AASHTO Guide for Flexibility in Highway Design
• Roundabout Application Guidelines for Ada County
• ACHD CAD Standards
• Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) Guidance Manual
• Stormwater Management Pond Revegetation Guidance Manual
2.0 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
2.1 Outreach
Products and Deliverables
• Design-Owner contact meetings and notes
• Identify community groups and key stakeholders
• Define Community Advisory Committee role and responsibilities
• Technical or special topic meetings
• Exhibits for webpage, newsletters, and post cards
o Webpage exhibits must be ADA compliant for viewing online
• Meeting materials, presentation, handouts, boards, and other meeting materials as needed
• Agendas for all meetings
• Draft meeting minutes/summary from all meetings
• Final meeting minutes/summary from all meetings
ACHD Responsibilities
• Zero (0) CAC meetings are assumed for costing purposes.
• ACHD will be responsible for costs associated with the rental of meeting rooms, tables,
chairs, and any refreshments.
39
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 8 of 26
• ACHD will be responsible for printing and postage of notification materials and follow-
up letters.
Assumptions
• Two (2) contact meetings are assumed and may include multiple stakeholders
2.2 Public Meetings
Products and Deliverables
• Information as requested for Project Information Sheet
• Information as requested for Project “Commonly Asked Questions and Answers” for
Public Involvement Meetings (PIM)
• Preparation for meetings including pre-PIM
• Meeting materials (agenda, display boards, etc.)
o Any exhibits to be on project website must be ADA compliant for viewing online
• Plan view display board converted to 11”x17” PDF(s)
• Project presentation (Flash/Power Point)
• Set up and take down for meetings
• Meeting Summary including a summary of comments received/submitted
Assumptions
• Two (2) public meetings will be held. One meeting will be held at the 30% design level
and the second meeting will be held at the 75% design level
• ACHD project manager will attend public meetings
• ACHD will review and approve all meeting notification materials
• ACHD will provide the following meeting materials: Written boards, sign in sheets and
handouts
• ACHD will provide sandwich boards
• ACHD will recruit staff from ACHD to support public meetings
• ACHD will advertise meetings
• Two (2) Consultant representatives will attend the public meetings
• The public meetings are assumed to be three (3) hours long
• Two (2) consultant provided display boards and color roll plots of the project for the first
meeting at 30% completion. Two (2) consultant provided display boards and color roll
plots will be provided for the second meeting at 75% completion.
• ACHD will be responsible for securing the meeting facilities
• ACHD will be responsible for costs associated with the rental of meeting rooms, tables,
chairs, and any refreshments
• ACHD will be responsible for printing and postage of notification materials and follow-
up letters
40
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 9 of 26
3.0 LOCATION SURVEYING AND MAPPING
Products and Deliverables
• Right of Entry letters prepared and delivered to ACHD for review and approval. After
ACHD approval, the letters shall be delivered to the property owners by the consultant at
least 5 days before survey activities begin.
• Request for Title Reports (include parcel number and name of owner)
• Existing right-of-way and property ownership base map (including all private and utility
easements)
• Topography map and survey data for the project
• Coordinates for all survey data including topographic data, right-of-way data,
monuments, control points set and found, benchmarks, and all mapping shall be provided
to ACHD on the Ada County GIS Coordinate System which is a modified state plane
projection unique from standard Idaho State Plane Coordinate.
• Calibration points shall be set outside of the construction limits to form a box around the
length and width of the project. Four (4) calibration points shall be set for projects under
2,000 linear feet, two before the beginning of construction and two past the end of
construction. On projects over 2,000 feet, an additional two monuments will be set near
the middle of the project (outside the construction limits). Intersection projects will
require placement of five (5) calibration points. One at the limits of each intersection leg
and one near the center of the intersecting roadways. The calibration points shall be a
minimum of a ½ inch rebar with control cap. The monuments must have Ada County GIS
coordinates and the elevation shown for each monument. Elevation shall be based on the
North American Vertical Datum (NAVD) 88.
• Temporary Benchmarks (TBM’s) shall be set at intervals of approximately 500 feet. The
TBM’s shall be established in locations which minimize disturbance during construction
and must be easily accessible to the contractor and/or surveyor. Monuments within the
roadway, i.e. Centerline monuments, and intersection monuments as well as chiseled “X”
in curbs which will be destroyed during construction shall not be used as TBM’s.
• Aerial Mapping and Photography will be provided by ACHD
• Digital terrain model of existing ground (by Precision based off CSC topo)
• Request to ACHD for utility locates
• Topographic mapping and contour base map sufficient for the design of roadway
improvements
• Base Map of Existing Utilities (created from maps provided by utility companies and
Digline information)
• Survey 20 pothole locations
• Right of way/appraisal staking – to include staking of existing right of way lines,
proposed right of way acquisitions and all easements including temporary easements.
Lines shall be staked according to ACHD survey standards:
o Existing Right of Way – Red flagging or paint
o Proposed Right of Way – Orange flagging or paint
o Permanent Easement – Yellow flagging or paint
41
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 10 of 26
o Temporary Easement – Blue flagging or paint
ACHD Responsibilities
• Review, approve, sign, and deliver the right of entry letter back to the consultant.
• Supply Title Reports within 60 days of request via ACHD’s PWA site
• Provide utility facility maps to Consultants and transmit design review drawings to
municipalities, utility companies, and irrigation districts
• Provide title reports upon request
Assumptions
• The roadway and right-of-way mapping limits consist of a corridor approximately 110-
feet wide, centered on the section line from end point of the splitter island of roundabout
at Amity Rd to approximately 600-ft north of Lake Hazel Road (approximately 4,500-ft).
Additional survey width may be required to identify property features (i.e. fence lines)
along project corridor. Features will be surveyed beyond the fence lines where feasible
and relevant to the project and will be included in right of entry letters. Topographic
survey for driveways will go back 100 feet or to the garage door, whichever occurs first.
• East and west on Taconic Dr approximate 500-ft in both directions beyond the existing
curb returns. Survey limits in this area will consist of a corridor approximately 100-feet
wide, centered on the roadway centerline.
• All survey data including found and set monuments shall be converted to the Ada County
GIS Coordinate System which is a modified state plane projection unique from standard
Idaho State Plane Coordinate. All mapping provided to ACHD shall be on the Ada
County GIS Coordinate System. A list of physical monuments with the corresponding
Ada County GIS coordinates is available at https://adacounty.id.gov/Development-
Services/Surveying-Division/GPS-Control.
o The feature location surveys for determination of x,y,z coordinate values, shall
comply with FGDC Geospatial Positioning Accuracy Standards, Part 4: Standards
for Architecture, Engineering, Construction (A/E/C), and Facility Management.
• This scope of work assumes 21 parcels may have right-of-way impacts and require legal
descriptions.
• All original field notes and computer files shall become the property of ACHD
• This scope of work does not include setting property pins or monuments.
• No paper copies of the base map will be provided.
3.1 Existing Surface DTM
Consultant will develop the existing surface 3D model. The surface will be developed utilizing
the survey points and break lines provided by survey Subconsultant.
Products and Deliverables
• Develop the existing 3D surface model
42
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 11 of 26
4.0 30% DESIGN
The minimum information required on a 30% design review plans shall show existing
facilities/features (including utilities) and location and general design features of planned
facilities including existing and proposed right of way. This includes but is not limited to line
and grade and other related items that will affect project design. These plans should be 30%
complete at minimum.
4.1 Concept Intersection and Roadway Design
Design conceptual roadway geometry for the proposed improvements. Consultant will prepare
roll plots of the concept design with typical sections showing lane widths for approval by
ACHD. Consultant will prepare one (1) alternative for Eagle Rd center about the section line and
the preferred intersection alternative for Eagle Rd and Taconic D. Roll plots will identify concept
level right-of-way impacts, utility impacts, and other design constraints associated with each
alternative. Consultant will attend a review meeting with ACHD to discuss the alignment
alternatives and make minor modifications to incorporate review comments.
Products and Deliverables
• Plan view exhibits of Conceptual Intersection and Roadway Alternative
ACHD Responsibilities
• Transmitting plan sets to project team.
• Perform internal review of all deliverables
Assumptions
• Preparing additional alignment and typical section alternatives beyond this scope of work
will be completed as additional services or under a supplemental agreement.
4.2 Geotechnical Investigation
The geotechnical engineering services for this project will be performed by Terracon
(Subconsultant) and will include explorations for the proposed roadway and stormwater
management improvements.
We understand the project proposes to widen Eagle Road from 2 lanes to 5 lanes. We
understand that the flexible pavement section will be developed for this project.
Field Exploration
In general, the field exploration will consist of soil borings for pavement design, piezometer
installation and infiltration rate tests. The subsurface exploration will consist of the following
items:
• Two boring will be drilled to a depth of approximately 17½ feet below the existing
ground surface for installation of piezometers to allow for measurement of groundwater
43
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 12 of 26
levels. The piezometers will be protected with a locking cap and a flush-mounted cover.
For this project, groundwater measurements from the piezometers will occur twice
monthly during the irrigation season, from about mid-April until the end of June 2021.
We assume CSC staff will obtain these groundwater measurements and provide the
results to the project team.
• Due to existing improvements along Eagle Road and the presence of utilities, we assume
space for infiltration testing within ACHD right of way and out of traffic lanes will be
limited. As a result, we propose to perform falling head infiltration rate tests in soil
borings. The project team will assist in determining the preliminary locations and the
depths of the percolation tests. Once possible locations of stormwater management
facilities have been identified, two borings will be drilled to a maximum depth of about
10 feet below the existing ground surface for these infiltration rate tests. These tests will
be performed within a 5-inch diameter solid pipe placed in each borehole. A bentonite
seal will be placed within the annular space around the outside of each pipe. This
borehole infiltration test method is not included among the approved methods listed in
Appendix B of Section 8200 of the ACHD Policy Manual. However, this test method
does allow the test to be performed within a limited space and with less ground
disturbance. After conceptual development of the stormwater management improvements
is complete and the actual facility types, locations, and depths are known, if a test method
described in Appendix B of Section 8200 of the ACHD Policy Manual is required, the
Subconsultant will prepare a supplemental scope of work and cost estimate for
performing those tests.
• As part of a previous ACHD projects, borings within Eagle Road have been completed.
Data from these previous borings will be used for development of the pavement sections
for the current project. A total of 1 to 3 borings will be drilled to provide additional
subsurface information for pavement design for the project. The actual number of borings
will depend on the existing geotechnical data provided by ACHD. The boring(s) will be
drilled to a depth of about 5 feet below the existing ground surface.
A ‘no-fee’ permit will be obtained from ACHD prior to working in the right-of-way. A traffic
control subcontractor will provide traffic control during drilling, piezometer installation, and
infiltration rate testing, as necessary. All borings will be backfilled in accordance with Idaho
Department of Water Resources requirements.
Appropriate utility clearance will be requested from DigLine prior to the exploration. Our
services do not include determining the locations of underground utilities beyond contacting the
“one-call” locate service, DigLine. If there are other utilities not located by DigLine, a utility
locate specialty contractor will need to be obtained to locate these utilities. A supplemental scope
of work and cost estimate will be prepared for this service. We are not responsible for damage to
unmarked utilities. It is assumed irrigation and stormwater pipes and structures will not be marked
by DigLine locators. We understand ACHD has GIS information regarding the approximate
locations of these features. We request ACHD provide that information to the project team prior to
drilling.
44
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 13 of 26
Borings will be logged by a field engineer/geologist and samples will be obtained as the drilling
progresses. Preliminary boring locations will be recorded using a recreational grade handheld
GPS. We will also mark the boring locations so that the project surveyor can record the
locations and elevations of the borings after drilling. We assume the field services described
above will be completed during two mobilizations, with the infiltration test borings being drilled
sometime after completion of the piezometers.
Accessing the boring locations outside the existing paved area will cause rutting and other
disturbance to the existing ground surface and vegetation, particularly borings within existing
landscaped areas. Restoration of this disturbance, beyond backfilling the bore holes, is not
included in our scope of services. If private landscaped sod or sprinklers are damaged during
drilling the damaged items will be repaired.
Laboratory Testing
Laboratory testing will be conducted on representative soil samples obtained from the field
exploration, and may include: moisture content, gradation, Atterberg limits, R-value, and
moisture density relationship. The actual tests performed will depend on the soil conditions
encountered.
Geotechnical Engineering Analysis and Report
Field and lab data from the field explorations will be reduced and analyzed for reporting
purposes. Terracon will design a flexible pavement section using ACHD design procedures for
the proposed reconstruction and the roundabout at Taconic Drive. A flexible pavement section
alternative that includes geogrid will also be prepared. The boring logs, laboratory test results,
infiltration test results, and recommended pavement sections will be included in the geotechnical
engineering report.
A draft report will be submitted by Terracon for review by Precision Engineering and ACHD.
After all reviews of the draft document are complete, we will discuss comments generated from
the reviews with the project team. We will incorporate these comments, as appropriate, and
submit a final version of the report. We will prepare a comment response sheet to document
actions taken on comments received. This scope of work does not include additional revisions to
the report or review iterations.
Design Review
Subconsultant will review the portions of the 75% Design Submittal that relate to the performed
geotechnical services for the Eagle Road widening. Comments of this review will be presented
in a letter.
Meetings
Our budget does not include attending project meetings.
45
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 14 of 26
Products and Deliverables
• Draft and final Geotechnical Engineering Reports including boring logs, a boring location
plan, results of laboratory tests, recommendations for flexible pavement materials and
thicknesses using ACHD design procedures and ISPWC specifications.
• If an infiltration test method listed in Appendix B of Section 8200 of the ACHD Policy
Manual is required, a supplemental scope of work and cost estimate will be prepared after
the actual facility types, locations, and depths are known.
• Letter with comments from Subconsultant’s review of the 75% Design Submittal.
ACHD Responsibilities
• Supply flexible ESALs or sufficient traffic information for Subconsultant to estimate
ESALs for design of the project pavements.
• Waive fee for the Temporary Highway Use Permit.
• Obtain property access permission from landowners, if required.
• Provide available GIS information regarding the location of stormwater pipes and
irrigation features in ACHD right-of-way within the project area.
Assumptions
• The proposed field explorations include a total of 1 to 3 roadway soil borings (depending
on the existing geotechnical data to be provided by ACHD), 2 piezometer borings, and 2
infiltration rate test borings.
• Boring locations will be accessible with a truck-mounted drill rig.
• Property access permission, if required, will be obtained by ACHD.
• Drilling will be performed during the daylight hours of 9:00 am to 4:00 pm.
• After completion of drilling, the boring locations will be surveyed by others on the
project team.
• ITD Materials Report formats are not required for this project.
• Signal pole mast-arm lengths will not exceed the those listed on ACHD’s Standard Signal
and CCTV Pole Foundation Detail, and geotechnical exploration and recommendations
will not be required for signal poles.
• A supplemental scope and cost estimate may be required for design level stormwater
management improvements.
• The scope of services does not include the abandonment of the piezometers.
• Existing pavements will be reconstructed. Rehabilitation of existing pavements is not
being considered for this project.
• Life-cycle cost analyses will not be performed for this project.
4.3 Hydraulic/Stormwater Design
All project designs must comply with the Clean Water Act, NPDES requirements and the
currently approved ACHD Section 8000 Stormwater policy and Section 8200 Stormwater
46
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 15 of 26
Design Manual. All projects should use the GSI Guidance Manual to determine the feasibility of
GSI for the project area.
In an effort to determine the suitable stormwater treatment facility an alternative analysis will be
prepared of the possible stormwater treatment solutions. The approval solution will be selected
before beginning the 75% design.
Products and Deliverables
• Draft Stormwater Report (including Design Life, Cost Analysis)
• Final Stormwater Report
• Prepare stormwater alternative analysis memo
• Site visit with irrigation districts
ACHD Responsibilities
• Review and Comment
• Review and approve all contact with irrigation districts
Assumptions
• Detailed drawings will not be prepared
4.4 Traffic (Intersection of Eagle Rd and Taconic Dr)
This task consists of the traffic analysis to determine the intersection type and lane configuration.
Once ACHD determines the intersection improvements for the intersection of Eagle Road and
Taconic Drive.
A multi-lane roundabout is currently planned for this intersection. This traffic analysis will
analyze a roundabout and a conventional signalized intersection. The lane configuration of the
signalized intersection must be approved by ACHD before the final evaluation is done for the
draft Traffic Report.
Both the roundabout and conventional signalized intersection will be analyzed using forecasted
2043 design year traffic volumes using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Methodology. If
a multi-lane or dual-lane roundabout is unable to accommodate the 20-year forecasted traffic
volumes using the HCM Methodology, an evaluation will be done using Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Roundabout Criteria. Consultant will analyze
intersection configurations for the design year of 2043. This analysis to be based on forecasts
from COMPASS’s official travel demand model, CIM 2.0, and the ACHD Master Street Map.
Peak hour turning movements will be developed using COMPASS AM and PM peak hour
forecasts, existing traffic counts, and expected future projected traffic numbers. Because the
morning and evening commute are highly directional in many areas in Ada County, an
evaluation of both AM and PM peak hours is recommended for a thorough analysis.
47
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 16 of 26
L2 Data Collections will conduct two (2) day intersection counts, including 24-hour and am and
pm peak-hour turning movement counts at the intersection.
Forecasted traffic volumes, adjustments made by the screen line process and the growth rate to
be utilized shall be approved by ACHD management before traffic analysis evaluations are to
begin.
The Draft and Final Traffic Report will include the preferred lane configuration of the
roundabout if the roundabout is feasible. Results of another roundabout with a different lane
configuration may be included for comparison.
ACHD Responsibilities
• Review and approve forecasted traffic volumes and conventional signalized intersection
lane configuration
• Review Traffic Report
• Select intersection type and final lane configuration
Assumptions
• Roundabout capacity analysis will be conducted using the HCM Methodology, and
possibly WSDOT Roundabout Criteria.
• If WSDOT Roundabout Criteria is the approved alternative ACHD will approve a design
exception to be included in the traffic analysis report.
• COMPASS will provide 2040 daily and peak hour travel demand model forecasts
• Concept-level design of the intersection types and lane configurations is assumed to be
either a roundabout or conventional signalized intersection.
Deliverables
• Draft and Final Traffic Report
• Conceptual Level Intersection Display of the Preferred Alternative, including the
supporting documents (fastest path and truck turn displays and fastest path calculations)
• Conceptual Level Cost Estimate of the Preferred Alternative
4.5 Environmental Evaluation
Cultural Resources:
The cultural resources documentation to support the Construction General Permit (CGP) for this
project will be performed by TAG Historical Research & Consulting. (Subconsultant).
Step 1 – Determine if there will be ground-disturbance. The screening process is initiated if
ground-disturbance will occur with the project. If ground disturbance occurs, TAG Historical
Research and Consulting (TAG) will undertake Steps 2 and 3 as outlined in the EPA in
Appendix E –Historic Property Screen Process from the CGP.
48
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 17 of 26
Step 2 – Identify prior surveys or evaluations conducted on the site.
This step consists of a literature review at Idaho State Historic Preservation (SHPO) offices to
identify previous investigations in the project area and, if needed, additional research in the
records of the Ada County Assessor records to determine construction dates for properties in the
project area. If properties over 50 years of age are identified during the county records search, a
reconnaissance-level survey will be undertaken to identify potentially eligible NRHP properties.
Evaluation of properties will also take into account the existing irrigation ditches including Ten
Mile Creek which is eligible to the NRHP.
Step 3 – Since a known NRHP eligible resources is located within the project area TAG will
prepare an Archaeological and Historic Resources Survey Report (AHSR) according to the
standards of the Idaho SHPO as revised December 2015. The AHSR identifies field methods
survey results and provides recommendations of project effects.
Products and Deliverables
• AHSR documenting findings (TAG)
ACHD Responsibilities
• Identify parcels which will be impacted by the installation of any storm water controls.
Assumptions
• An intensive level survey will be conducted to determine project effects to the NRHP
eligible Ten Mile Creek and other historic resources identified in the project area.
4.6 30% Design Submittal
This task includes performing an internal review of all deliverables and preparing the submittal
documents. The Consultant will deliver one paper and one PDF copy.
Products and Deliverables
• All deliverables will be uploaded to ACHD’s PWA site
o PWA File Folder: 13 30 Percent Design-CPD20/Design Submittal-CPD20.20
• Roll Plot of roadway and intersection design with typical section
• Preliminary Pavement Sections
• Request for design exceptions
• Hydraulic / Stormwater Report and Alternative Analysis
• Intersection Traffic Analysis Report
• Cultural/Historic AHSR
• 30% Cost Estimate
• 30% ROW Required Square Footage (ROW, TE, PE) in Excel
• PDFs of all deliverables
• All native files including CAD files (insert and bind all x-refs into one CAD file)
49
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 18 of 26
ACHD Responsibilities
• Transmitting plan sets to project team.
• Perform internal review of all deliverables
Assumptions
• The engineer will adhere to the ISPWC item number process, as well as the Special
Provisions (SP), and ACHD’s Standard Special Provisions (SSP)
• Do not anticipate a need for design exceptions
• ITD color utility plans not required
• A formal Concept Design Report is not included in this Scope of Work
4.7 30% Review Meeting (Working Meeting)
The 30% Design Review Meeting will be a working meeting with the intent of having the project
team review and collaborate at the time of the meeting. The outcome of the meeting will be to
ensure the direction of the design meets the proposed purpose and need of the project before
proceeding to 75% design submittal.
Products and Deliverables
• Review Meeting Notes
ACHD Responsibilities
• Schedule and Host Meeting
Assumptions
• ACHD will complete the review within one (1) week of receiving the 30% Design
Submittal
• A plan in hand meeting is not required for this submittal
5.0 75% DESIGN
The minimum information required on a 75% design review plans shall show existing
facilities/features and location and general design features of planned facilities. This includes
but is not limited to line and grade and other related items that will affect project design. These
plans should be at 75% complete at minimum.
5.1 75% Intersection and Roadway Design
The minimum information required on 75% design review plans shall show existing facilities /
features and location and general design features of planned improvements.
50
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 19 of 26
5.2 75% Hydraulic / Stormwater Design
The Subconsultant will determine preliminary sizes and show and label locations for all drainage
facilities (pipes, culverts, inlets, manholes, and water quality treatment and disposal facilities) on
plan and profile sheets.
5.3 75% Gravity Irrigation
The Subconsultant will layout and verify the size of the irrigation structures. The minimum
information required on the preliminary design review plans shall be complete enough to show
location and general design features of all existing and proposed irrigation facilities.
5.4 75% Traffic Signal Design (RRFBs at Roundabout)
The Consultant will design the initial layout of the traffic signals at the Eagle Road and Taconic
Drive intersection, plans will be drafted showing new signal poles, mast arms, and luminaires as
necessary for the proposed improvements.
5.5 75% Intersection Lighting and Interconnect Design
The Consultant will design the intersection street lighting within the project limits. Consultant
will design the interconnect improvements to perpetuate the existing system and coordinate with
ACHD Congestion Management on cable sizes for possible upgrades.
5.6 75% Signing and Pavement Markings
The Consultant will develop signing and pavement markings in accordance with MUTCD,
current ACHD standards and applicable state and local laws and ordinances.
5.7 75% Temporary Traffic Control
The Consultant will develop the advanced temporary traffic control plan. It is anticipated Eagle
Road will remain open during construction and a detour plan will not be developed in the scope
of work. Temporary Phasing plans will be prepared with 95%.
5.8 75% Pedestrian Detour Plan
The Consultant will develop the temporary pedestrian detour plan to address pedestrian routing
during construction.
5.9 75% Right-of-Way
The Consultant will develop right-of-way requirements using alignment geometry developed for
75% design that defines the limits of additional right-of-way requirements. Permanent and
temporary easements will be identified, when possible. Proposed ROW and easements will be
shown on plan and profile sheets, Separate ROW plans will not be prepared for the 75% design.
5.10 75% Utility Coordination
The Consultant shall include the existing facilities on the plans
51
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 20 of 26
5.11 Utility Potholing
Subconsultant (Badger) will pothole throughout the corridor to identify the presence of
subsurface utilities at specific locations. The intent of this task is not to identify all utility
locations, the Contractor will still be responsible for locating all utilities during construction.
Potholing will be accomplished with a vacuum truck to minimize field impacts. This scope
includes up to 20 potholes. Utility locations will be marked in the field by Digline and pothole
locations will be based on the Digline locates. Consultant will coordinate pothole requirements
and locations with ACHD. Consultant will be available to provide additional potholing as
Additional Services.
Products and Deliverables
• Utility conflict evaluation
• Potholing. This scope of work assumes 20 potholes will be required. Additional
potholing will be provided as a supplemental service.
• Pothole location map – to be reviewed and approved by ACHD Utility Coordinator prior
to potholing commencing.
5.12 75% Quantities and Construction Cost Estimate
The Consultant will tabulate quantities and prepare the 75% construction cost estimate for the
project entered into B2W per ACHD User Guide. The ISPWC bid item description and number
format and ACHD’s Standard Special Provisions (SSPs) and Special Provisions (SPs) item
description and number format will be followed. If a viable item number/description cannot be
found, the Consultant will prepare a Special Provision Request or Modification Form and submit
to the ACHD Project Manager for approval. The cost estimates will be based on a combination
of the most current bid averages report available on ACHD’s website and engineering judgment.
5.13 75% Design Submittal
This task includes performing an internal review of all deliverables and preparing the submittal
documents. Deliverable shall be in PDF format.
ACHD Responsibilities
• Transmitting plan sets to irrigation districts, utility companies, and local agencies.
• Perform internal review of all deliverables
Products and Deliverables
• All deliverables will be uploaded to ACHD’s PWA site
o PWA File Folder: 14 75 Percent Design-CPD90/Preliminary Design Submittal-
CPD90.10
• Title Sheet
• Typical Sections (2 sheets)
• Removal and Utility Plans (6 sheets)
52
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 21 of 26
• Roadway Plan and Profile Sheets – Including stormwater/irrigation profiles and pothole
information (12 sheets)
o Include measurement on roadway plans from structure to new ROW line if less
than 20’
• Eagle and Taconic Roundabout and Splitter Island Curve Plans (2 sheets)
• Eagle and Taconic Roundabout and Splitter Island Curb Table (1 sheet)
• Eagle and Taconic Roundabout Grading Plan (2 sheets)
• Eagle and Taconic Roundabout Central Island Curb Profile (1 sheet)
• Stormwater and Irrigation Pipe Profile Sheets (4 sheets) – by CSC
o Including pond revegetation as outlined in the Stormwater Management Pond
Revegetation Guidance Manual
• Drainage and Irrigation Detail Sheets (2 sheets) – by CSC
• Signal Plans RRFBs at Roundabout( 2 sheets)
o Consult with Utility Coordinator regarding power supply
• Signal Interconnect Conduit & Intersection Lighting Plans (4 sheets)
o Consult with Utility Coordinator regarding power supply
• Signing and Striping Sheets (4 sheets)
• Advanced Construction Signing (1 sheet)
• Temporary Pedestrian Routing Plan (2 Sheets)
• 75% Cost Estimate on the ACHD Spreadsheet and uploaded into B2W per ACHD User
Guide
• 75% ROW Required Square Footage (ROW Fee, TE, PE) by Parcel (ROW Requirements
Table) – on plans and Excel
• PDF’s of all deliverables – PDF plans need to be to scale at 11”x17” (46 Sheets)
o No hard copies of any deliverable required
• All native files including One CAD File (insert and bind all x-refs into One CAD File)
Assumptions
• The engineer will adhere to the ISPWC item number process, as well as the Special
Provisions (SP), and ACHD’s Standard Special Provisions (SSP)
5.14 75% Review Meeting
ACHD will provide comments and the review plan sets to the Consultant prior to the meeting.
The Consultant shall compile comments on the Comment/Response Matrix and send draft to
Project Manager prior to the meeting. The Consultant will attend the 75% Design Review
meeting to discuss review comments. ACHD will make final decisions for conflicting review
comments. Consultant will complete the Comment/Response Matrix after the 75% Design
Review and submit to ACHD.
The Consultant will attend a plan-in-hand field review meeting and prepare notes summarizing
field review comments and decisions made.
53
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 22 of 26
Products and Deliverables
• Review Meeting Minutes/Notes
• Maintain Comment/Response Matrix
• Plan-in-Hand Field Review Meeting Notes
ACHD Responsibilities
• Schedule and host Plan-in-Hand meeting
• Schedule and host Meeting
• Provide Comments – One (1) week prior to the meeting
Assumptions
• ACHD will complete the review within two (2) weeks of receiving the 75% Design
Submittal
• Assumed ITD Standard Utility Plans not required
6.0 95% DESIGN
6.1 Intersection and Roadway Design
The Consultant and Subconsultants will make modifications based on the 75% design review
comments and prepare the 95% design and miscellaneous details. To include: intersection and
roadway grading and details, stormwater and irrigation design and details, traffic signal,
illumination and ITS design and details, signing and striping, traffic control and construction
phasing details, SWPPP, special provision preparation, construction cost estimating and right-of-
way plans. Roadway cross sections at 50-ft intervals will be drafted and will include elevation
changes at each driveway.
6.2 95% Design Submittal
This task includes performing an internal review of all deliverables and preparing the submittal
documents. Deliverable shall be in PDF or electronic format. ACHD will be responsible for
transmitting plan sets to irrigation districts, utility companies, and local agencies.
Products and Deliverables
• All deliverables will be uploaded to ACHD’s PWA site
o PWA File Folder: 15 95 Percent Design-CPD50/Draft Final Design Submittal-
CPD50.10
• Title Sheet
• Typical Sections (2 sheets)
• Removal and Utility Plans (6 sheets)
• Roadway Plan and Profile Sheets – Including stormwater/irrigation profiles and pothole
information (12 sheets)
o Include measurement on roadway plans from structure to new ROW line if less
than 20’
54
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 23 of 26
• Roadway Detail Sheets (2 Sheets)
• Eagle and Taconic Roundabout and Splitter Island Curve Plans (2 sheets)
• Eagle and Taconic Roundabout and Splitter Island Curb Table (1 sheet)
• Eagle and Taconic Roundabout Grading Plan (2 sheets)
• Eagle and Taconic Roundabout Central Island Curb Profile (1 sheet)
• Stormwater and Irrigation Pipe Profile Sheets (4 sheets) – by CSC
o Including pond revegetation as outlined in the Stormwater Management Pond
Revegetation Guidance Manual
• Drainage and Irrigation Detail Sheets (2 sheets) – by CSC
• Signal Plans RRFBs at Roundabout (2 sheets)
o Consult with Utility Coordinator regarding power supply
• Signal Interconnect Conduit & Intersection Lighting Plans (4 sheets)
o Consult with Utility Coordinator regarding power supply
• Signing and Striping Sheets (4 sheets)
• Advanced Construction Signing (1 sheets)
• Temporary Traffic Control and Construction Phasing Plan (including bicycle and
pedestrian facilities) – (5 sheets)
• SWPPP (2 sheets) – by CSC
• Special Provisions
• 95% Cost Estimate entered into B2W per ACHD User Guide
• 95% Color ROW Plans (14 Sheets)
o Include measurement from structure to new ROW line if less than 20’
• 95% ROW Required Square Footage (ROW, TE, PE) by Parcel (ROW Requirements
Table) – on plans and Excel
• List on the plans, in table form, all monuments found within the project limits,
identifying Station and Offset from control line and monument type found (I.C. 55-1613).
– by CSC
• List on the plans, in table form, all calibration points, including northing, easting,
elevation and monument type.
• Show on the plan sheets, the locations of TBM’s and provide TBM information (Station,
Offset, Northing, Easting, Elevation and monument type).
• 95% Stormwater Report (including calculations & Runoff Reduction Feasibility Analysis
Documentation From as required) – by CSC
• 404 Joint Application for Permit – by CSC
• 75% design Plans and estimate with ACHD comments
• 75% Comment/Response Matrix
• PDFs of all deliverables – PDF plans need to be to scale at 11”x17” (53 Sheets)
o No hard copies of any deliverable required
• All native files including One CAD File (insert and bind all x-refs into One CAD File)
Assumptions
The engineer will adhere to the ISPWC item number process, as well as the Special Provisions
(SP), and ACHD’s Standard Special Provisions (SSP)
55
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 24 of 26
6.3 95% Review Meeting
Products and Deliverables
• Review Meeting Minutes/Notes
• Maintain Comment/Response Matrix
ACHD Responsibilities
• Schedule and host Meeting
• Provide Comments – One (1) week prior to the meeting
Assumptions
• ACHD will complete the review within two (2) weeks of receiving the 95% Design
Submittal
7.0 99% DESIGN
The Consultant will incorporate comments from the 95% Design review meeting into the 99%
Design submittal documents and perform an internal review. The plans will be finalized for
Right ofWay acquisition and legal descriptions and accompanying sketches will be prepared.
The Consultant will provide support during Right of Way acquisition and make changes to
construction and right of way plans as requested by ACHD Project Manager.
7.1 Finalize Plans for Right of Way Acquisition
Products and Deliverables
• All deliverables will be uploaded to ACHD’s PWA site
o PWA File Folder: 16 99 Percent Designl-CPD65
• 11”x17” construction plans (53 sheets) signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer
registered in the State of Idaho
• 11”x17” color Right of Way plans (14 sheets), signed and sealed by a Professional Land
Surveyor registered in the State of Idaho;
o Parcels which have acquisition(s), ROW plans shall show the station and offset of
each angle point of the acquisition, including angle points along the existing
ROW and at the intersections with property lines of the affected property.
• 99% ROW Required Square Footage (ROW Fee, TE, PE) by Parcel (ROW Requirements
Table) – on plans and Excel
o Include column for subproject numbers in ROW table if applicable.
• PDF of construction plans (53 sheets) signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer
registered in the State of Idaho – PDF plans need to be to scale at 11”x17”.
• PDF of color Right of- Way plans (14 sheets), signed and sealed by a Professional Land
Surveyor registered in the State of Idaho – PDF plans need to be to scale at 11”x17”.
• One PDF set of legal descriptions with exhibits for takes and permanent easements,
signed and sealed by a Professional Land Surveyor registered in the State of Idaho.
56
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 25 of 26
• ACHD ROW Checklist
• One PDF set of cross sections to include elevation changes at each driveway.
• PDF Special Provisions, signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer registered in the
State of Idaho
• Completed “ACHD Supplied SWPPP Information”
• List on the plans, in table form, all monuments found within the project limits,
identifying Station and Offset from control line and monument type found (I.C. 55-1613).
• List on the plans, in table form, all calibration points, including northing, easting,
elevation and monument type.
• Show on the plan sheets, the locations of TBM’s and provide TBM information (Station,
Offset, Northing, Easting, Elevation and monument type).
• 99% Cost Estimate on the ACHD Spreadsheet and uploaded into B2W per ACHD User
Guide
• 95% Design plans and reports with ACHD comments
• 95% Comment/Response Matrix
• 95% Right of Way Plans with ACHD comments
• All final permits
• PDFs of all deliverables – no hard copies of any deliverable required
• All native files including One CAD File (insert and bind all x-refs into One CAD File)
• Contingency Item: Design support during ROW acquisition.
ACHD Responsibilities
Assumptions
• The engineer will adhere to the ISPWC item number process, as well as the
Special Provisions (SP), and ACHD’s Standard Special Provisions (SSP)
8.0 100% BID DOCUMENTS
The Consultant will incorporate changes made during Right of Way negotiations into the plans.
Contract end date needs to be after bid opening. This work is not included in this contract and
will be included in a separate contract.
Products and Deliverables
• All deliverables will be uploaded to ACHD’s PWA site
o PWA File Folder: 17 100 Percent Design-CPD55/100 Percent Plans-CPD55.10
• 100% Plans (22”x34”) – PDF, signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer registered in
the State of Idaho
• 100% Plans (11”x17”) – PDF, signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer registered in
the State of Idaho
• 100% Specifications – PDF, signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer registered in
the State of Idaho
57
Item 8.
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd
Scope of Work | Schedule | Budget
Ada County Highway District Precision Engineering, LLC
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd / Amity Rd November 19, 2020
ACHD Project No. 521043 | GIS No. RD216-04 Page 26 of 26
o Review utility contact information and durations with Utility Coordinator prior to
submittal
o Include a description of work to be completed by the utility company under
contact information
• 100% Cost Estimate on ACHD provided spreadsheet
• 100% Cost Estimate on the ACHD Spreadsheet and uploaded into B2W per ACHD User
Guide
• Completed “ACHD Supplied SWPPP Information”
• Cross Sections – PDF
• Shallow Injection Well Inventory Forms (for any subsurface drainage feature)
• Vectorized PDF of 100% Plans – PDF plans need to be to scale at 11”x17”
o Layer control required
▪ Include layer for all removals (to view as if Removal Sheets)
• CAD files per instructions on ACHD Website.
ACHD Responsibilities
• Supply consultant with Compensation Summaries and any other pertinent documentation
of design changes ACHD agreed to as part of right-of-way negotiations
Assumptions
• The engineer will adhere to the ISPWC item number process, as well as the Special
Provisions (SP), and ACHD’s Standard Special Provisions (SSP)
• This work is not included in this contract and will be included in a separate contract.
9.0 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING
This task addresses engineering support during the construction phases of the project and the
record of survey which occurs after construction is complete. This work is not included in this
contract and will be included in a separate contract if required.
58
Item 8.
LABOR HOURS TOTAL Principal Eng (PE, PTOE) Project Eng (PE) Staff Eng (EIT)
TASK 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS - PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1.1 Progress Meetings
Kick-off Meeting 4 2 2
Progress Meetings 20 12 8
1.2 Project Administration (13 Month Design)
General Project Management 108 88 20
Milestone Schedule 8 8
Monthly Invoices & 0771 Form 18 18
Cash Flow Spread Sheet 8 8
TASK 1 TOTAL 166 136 30 0
TASK 2 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
2.1 Outreach (2 Contact Meetings) 20 16 4
2.2 Public Meetings (2 Meeting 30% & 75%)
Prepare Exhibits 42 2 8 32
Attend Meetings 12 6 6
Meeting Notes 22 2 4 16
TASK 2 TOTAL 96 26 18 52
TASK 3 LOCATION SURVEYING AND MAPPING (CSC)
Field Survey Task Coordination 0
Develop existing ground 3D DTM Surface (Precision) 52 12 40
TASK 3 TOTAL 52 12 40 0
TASK 4 30% DESIGN
4.1 4.1 Concept Roadway Design
Develop the Design for One Alternative 96 24 32 40
Develop Roll plot with typical section 26 2 8 16
Develop Cost Estimate 34 2 8 24
Determine 30% ROW Area and Prepare Excel Table 22 2 12 8
4.2 Geotechnical Investigation (Terracon)
Geotechnical Coordination 4 4
4.3 Hydraulic/Stormwater Design
Hydraulic Coordination 8 8
4.4 Traffic (Eagle Rd and Taconic Dr Intersection)
Complete Analysis 136 40 80 16
Prepare Draft Traffic Report 70 20 40 10
Revise and Prepare Final Traffic Report 26 2 24
Design 30% Intersection of Perferred Alternative (Assumed
Roundabout) 120 40 60 20
Roll plot of the Preferred Alternative & Support Displays:
Fastest Path, Truck Turns, Lighting Contours 66 6 36 24
Develop Cost Estimate of Preferred Alternative 24 8 16
4.5 Environmental Evaluation (TAG)
Cultural Resources Coordination 2 2
4.6 30% Design Submittal
Internal Review and prepare Submittals 18 2 4 12
4.7 30% Review Meeting
Prepare for and Attend Meeting, Prepare Meeting Notes,
Summarize Comments and Prepare Responses 6 2 4
TASK 4 TOTAL 658 156 316 186
TASK 5 75% DESIGN
5.1 Roadway Design
Prepare Roadway Design 72 32 40
Title Sheet 2 2
Typical Section Sheet (2 Sheets) 34 8 26
Removal and Utility Plans (6 Sheets) 70 2 48 20
Plan and Profile Sheets (12 Sheets) 300 20 200 80
Roundabout and Splitter Island Curve Plans (2 sheets) 36 4 32
Roundabout and Splitter Island Curb Table (1 sheet) 32 8 24
Roundabout Grading Plan (2 sheets) 52 12 40
Roundabout Central Island Curb Profile (1 sheet) 14 2 12
Quantities 20 4 16
5.2 Hydraulic / Stormwater Design (CSC)
Horizontal Storm Drain on Roadway Plan & Profile Sheets 8 8
MAN-HOUR ESTIMATE
EAGLE RD, LAKE HAZEL RD TO AMITY RD
ACHD PROJECT NO. 521043
November 19, 2020
ACHD GIS NO. RD216-04
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd to Amity Rd Ada County Highway District Page 1 of 3
59
Item 8.
LABOR HOURS TOTAL Principal Eng (PE, PTOE) Project Eng (PE) Staff Eng (EIT)
MAN-HOUR ESTIMATE
EAGLE RD, LAKE HAZEL RD TO AMITY RD
ACHD PROJECT NO. 521043
November 19, 2020
ACHD GIS NO. RD216-04
5.3 Gravity Irrigation (CSC)
Horizontal GI on Roadway Plan & Profile Sheets 8 8
5.4 Traffic Signal Design (RRFBs)
Traffic Signal Plan Sheet (2 Sheets) 44 8 36
Quantities 2 2
5.5 Intersection Lighting and Interconnect Design
Interconnect and Illumination Plan Sheets (4 Sheets) 68 16 40 12
Quantities 10 4 6
5.6 Signing And Striping Design
Signing and Pavement Marking Sheets (4 Sheets) 82 2 24 56
Quantities 8 2 6
5..7 Temporary Traffic Control
Advanced Construction Signing (1 Sheet) 28 12 16
Quantities 4 2 2
5..8 Pedestrian Detour Routing Plan
Temporary Pedestrian Routing Plan (2 Sheets) 64 16 32 16
Quantities 4 4
5.90 Right of Way
Develop ROW Table 4 4
5.10 Utility Coordination
Utility Coordination and Utility Base Map Development 34 2 8 24
Pothole location map 12 4 8
5.11 Utility Potholing
Pothole Coordination 6 6
5.12 Quantities And Construction Cost Estimate
Construction Cost Estimate in B2W 12 2 10
5.13 75% Internal Design Review Submittal
Internal Review and prepare Submittals 32 16 14 2
5.14 75% Review Meeting
Prepare for and Attend Meeting, Prepare Meeting Notes,
Summarize Comments and Prepare Responses 10 2 2 6
Plan in Hand Field Review Meeting: prepare Meeting Notes,
Summarize Comments and Prepare Responses 4 2 2
TASK 5 TOTAL 1076 104 568 404
TASK 6 95% DESIGN
6.1 Roadway Design
Prepare Roadway Design 24 20 4
Title Sheet 0 0
Typical Section Sheet (2 Sheets) 10 2 8
Removal and Utility Plans (6 Sheets) 24 16 8
Plan and Profile Sheets (12 Sheets) 96 6 60 30
Roadway Details Sheets (2 Sheets) 18 2 16
Roundabout and Splitter Island Curve Plans (2 sheets) 10 2 8
Roundabout and Splitter Island Curb Table (1 sheet) 6 2 4
Roundabout Grading Plan (2 sheets) 12 2 10
Roundabout Central Island Curb Profile (1 sheet) 10 6 4
Quantities 18 6 12
6.2 Hydraulic / Stormwater Design (CSC)
Horizontal Storm Drain on Roadway Plan & Profile Sheets 2 2
6.3 Gravity Irrigation (CSC)
Horizontal GI on Roadway Plan & Profile Sheets 2 2
6.4 SWPPP (CSC)
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd to Amity Rd Ada County Highway District Page 2 of 3
60
Item 8.
LABOR HOURS TOTAL Principal Eng (PE, PTOE) Project Eng (PE) Staff Eng (EIT)
MAN-HOUR ESTIMATE
EAGLE RD, LAKE HAZEL RD TO AMITY RD
ACHD PROJECT NO. 521043
November 19, 2020
ACHD GIS NO. RD216-04
6.5 Traffic Signal Design (RRFBs)
Traffic Signal Plan Sheet (2 Sheets) 12 4 8
Quantities 1 1
6.6 Lighting and Interconnect Design
Interconnect and Illumination Plan Sheets (4 Sheets) 10 2 8
Quantities 2 2
6.7 Signing And Striping Design
Signing and Pavement Marking Sheets (4 Sheets) 22 2 8 12
Quantities 4 2 2
6.8 Temporary Traffic Control
Advanced Construction Signing (1 Sheet) 12 4 8
Temp Traffic Control & Construction Phasing (3 Sheets) 44 4 24 16
Quantities 6 2 4
6.9 Pedestrian Detour Routing Plan
Temporary Pedestrian Routing Plan (2 sheet) 26 2 8 16
Quantities 6 2 4
6.10 Right of Way
Develop ROW Plans (14 Sheets) 88 8 20 60
6.11 Utility Coordination
Utility Coordination 2 2
6.12 Special Provisions
Prepare Special Provisions 28 4 24
6.13 Quantities And Construction Cost Estimate
Construction Cost Estimate in B2W 6 2 4
6.14 95% Internal Design Review Submittal
Internal Review and prepare Submittals 24 8 16
6.15 95% Review Meeting
Prepare for and Attend Meeting, Prepare Meeting Notes,
Summarize Comments and Prepare Responses 12 2 2 8
TASK 6 TOTAL 537 46 260 231
TASK 7 99% DESIGN
7.1 Finalize Plans for Right-of-Way Acquisition 280 40 140 100
TASK 7 TOTAL 280 40 140 100
TASK 8 100% DESIGN - NOT REQUIRED
TASK 8 TOTAL 0 0 0 0
TASK 9 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING - NOT REQUIRED
TASK 9 TOTAL 0 0 0 0
TOTAL LABOR HOURS 2865 520 1372 973
BUDGET
HOURLY TOTAL
LABOR RATE COST
Principal Engineer $140.00 72,800.00$
Project Engineer $125.00 171,500.00$
Staff Engineer $90.00 87,570.00$
TOTAL LABOR 331,870.00$
DIRECT EXPENSES
Assume PIM Boards will be online only -$
TOTAL DIRECT EXPENSES -$
SUBCONSULTANTS
Civil Survey Consultants (Survey, SD,GI, 404) 154,542.00$
Terracon (Geotechnical Investigation) 25,231.01$
TAG Historical Research and Consulting (Cultural) 2,228.46$
L2 Data Collection (Intersection Counts) 2,600.00$
Badger 20 Utility Potholes, Estimated $500/Each 10,000.00$
TOTAL SUBCONSULTANT EXPENSES 194,601.47$
TOTAL BUDGET 526,471.47$
Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd to Amity Rd Ada County Highway District Page 3 of 3
61
Item 8.
Civil Survey Consultants
Design Services Man-Hour and Fee Estimate - Draft #1 - November 16, 2020
Survey, Storm Drain, & Irrigation Design
Task Description Project Chief Of Project Project Design/ Survey Total
Manager Surveys Engineer Surveyor Survey Crew Man-Hours
Technician I
1.0
1.1 Kickoff Meeting 2 2
Progress Meetings (4 Meetings, as needed)8 8
1.2 Project Administration (10 Months)10 10
Project Coordination 20 20
Monthly Project Status Reports 55
Earned Value Reports 55
Invoices 10 10
2.0
N/A 0
3.0
Right of Entry Letter 145
Request Title Reports 22
Existing right-of-way and property ownership 60 60
Topography map and survey data (4,500 feet on Eagle + 1,000 feet on Taconic)8 160 168
Aerial Mapping and Photography (Not Required - Provided by ACHD)0
Digital terrain model of existing ground (Will not be provided)0
Request to ACHD for utility locates 11
Draft Utilities based on mapping/Record Digline markings 14813
Topographic mapping/drafting 8 100 108
Set centerline control and bench marks 12 12
Set project calibration points 88
Cross Sections (2 intersections, 12 driveways)2 7 16 25
Property Corner Search & Tie 83240
Survey Pot Hole Locations/Draft in Profile (20 Potholes)8816
Right-of-Way / appraisal staking 83240
4.0
4.2 Geotechnical Investigation -Groundwater monitoring (10 months)42024
4.3 Hydraulic/Stormwater Design 12 20 32
4.3.1 - Draft Stormwater Report 18 9
4.3.2 - Final Stormwater Report 14 5
4.3.3 - Site visits w/ Irrigation Districts 44
4.6 30% Design Submittal 0
4.6.1 - Request for design exceptions (SD/Irr)11
4.6.2 - Cost estimate (SD/Irr)268
4.6.3 - ROW Requirement Square Footage (By Precision)0
4.7 Review Meeting 0
4.7.1 - Prepare Review Comment matrix/Respond to SD/Irr comments 44
4.7.2 - Attend Meeting 22
6.0
6.0 75% Design Submittal
6.2.1- Hydraulic/Stormdrain Design 2 203254
6.2.2 - 75% Storm Drain Report 216 18
6.3 - Irrigation Facility Design 2 203254
6.4 - SWPPP 21618
6.13 - Estimate 21214
6.14 - 75% Submittal 48 12
6.15.1 - Prepare Review Comment Matrix 18 9
6.15.2 - Attend Review Meeting/Prepare Meeting Minutes 44
6.15.3 - Attend Plan-In-Hand Meeting/Prepare Meeting Minutes 88
7.0
7.2 95% Design Submittal 0
7.2.1 - Hydraulic/Storm Drainage Design 1 6 12 19
7.2.2 - 95% Storm Drain Report 18 9
7.2.3 - Irrigation Facility Design 1 6 12 19
7.2.4 - Storm Drain & Irrigation Detail Sheets 2 162442
7.2.5 - SWPPP 145
7.2.6 - 404 Permit 16 32 48
7.2.7 - Monument Table 28 10
7.2.8 - Calibration Point Table 24 6
7.2.9 - Estimate (SD & Irr)2810
7.2.10 - Special Provisions (SD & Irr)18817
7.2.11 - 95% Submittal Documents & file management 18817
7.3 95% Review Meeting 0
7.3.1 - Prepare Review Comment Matrix 88
7.3.2 - Attend Meeting/Prepare Meeting Minutes 44
8.0
8.1 Finalize Plans for Right-of-Way Acquisition
8.1.1 -Plans 4 8 20 32
8.1.2 -Review ROW plans & Create Legal Descriptions and Sketches for Takes & PE on 21 parcels, and ROW checklist 2 63 65
8.1.3 - Special Provisions 44
8.1.4 - Cost Estimate 2810
8.1.5 - ACHD supplied SWPPP information 145
8.1.6 - Permits (404 Joint App Permit)41620
8.1.6 - Submittal documents and file management 4 8 16 28
9.0
N/A 0
Total Man-Hours 70 0 266 167 437 276 1216
Classification Hours Rate Total
Project Manager 70 145.00$ 10,150.00$
Chief Of Surveys 0 145.00$ -$
Project Engineer 266 132.00$ 35,112.00$
Project Surveyor 167 120.00$ 20,040.00$
Design/Survey Technician I 437 100.00$ 43,700.00$
Survey Crew 276 165.00$ 45,540.00$
Total 1,216 154,542.00$
Ada County Highway District
Eagle Road, Lake Hazel to Amity
ACHD Project No. 521043; GIS No. RD216-04
General
Public Involvement - Not Required
Location Surveying and Mapping
30% Design
75% Design
95% Design
99% Design
100% Bid Documents - Not Included
Design Services
11/17/2020
62
Item 8.
A. SUMMARY ESTIMATED LABOR DAY COSTS
Labor Hours Hrly Rate
Cost
1 QC Review Engineer (R. Olsen) 14 @ $53.37 = $747.18
2 Geotechnical Engineer (K. Hoagland) 50 @ $47.00 = $2,350.00
3 Sr. Staff Engineer (L. Marsh) 17 @ $32.69 = $555.73
4 Field Engineer (A. Silverthorne) 30 @ $25.12 = $753.60
5 Sr. Admin. Staff (J. Schmalhorst) 8 @ $26.00 = $208.00
SUBTOTAL RAW LABOR COST = $4,614.51
* See Attached Labor Hour Estimate
B. PAYROLL, FRINGE BENEFIT COSTS & OVERHEAD
Total Raw Labor Cost
$4,614.51 X =$8,534.54
C. FIXED FEE
Total Raw Labor & Overhead
$13,149.05 X =$1,577.89
D. FCCM
Total Raw Labor Cost
$4,614.51 X =$49.38
E. OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSE SUMMARY
Unit Cost Expense
1 Mileagex @ $0.575 = $55.20
2 Printing, Maps, UPS, etc (estimate) @ $100.00 = $100.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENSE = $155.20
F. SUBCONSULTANTS AND TERRACON LABORATORY TESTING
Unit Cost Expense
1 Drilling Contractor (estimate)= $5,746.00
2 Traffic Control Contractor (estimate) = $1,828.50
3 Terracon Laboratory Testing
Moisture Content @ $19.00 = $190.00
Atterberg Limits @ $90.00 = $270.00
Sieve Analysis, SPT Samples @ $70.00 = $420.00
Sieve Analysis, Bulk Samples @ $95.00 = $285.00
pH @ $20.00 = $40.00
Minimum Resistivity @ $70.00 = $140.00
Proctor Tests @ $180.00 = $360.00
R-value Tests @ $510.00 = $1,020.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED SUB/LAB EXPENSE = $10,299.50
X As per the "FEDERAL PER DIEM RATES FOR IDAHO"
XX See Attached Subconsultant's Summary
TOTAL =
Estimated Quantity
1.07%
Approved FCCM Rate
Approved Fixed Fee Rate
96
12.0%
1
Estimated Amount
3
$25,231.01
3
XX
10
6
XX
2
2
2
2
TERRACON
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
EAGLE RD, LAKE HAZEL RD TO AMITY RD
COST ESTIMATE
184.95%
ADA COUNTY, IDAHO
Approved Overhead Rate
Terracon_Eagle Rd-Lake Hazel to Amity_Hour and Cost Estimate_.xlsx\Cost
11/18/2020
63
Item 8.
TASK # TASK DESCRIPTION TOTAL
QC REVIEW
ENGINEER
GEOTECH
ENGINEER
SR. STAFF
ENGINEER
FIELD
ENGINEER CLERICAL
1.2 Administration and Invoicing 1013006
Administration and Invoicing 10 1 3 6
4.2 Geotechnical / Pavement Report 109 13 47 17 30 2
Underground Utilities and Temporary Use Permit 11 1 2 8
Soil Borings (3 Pavement Borings, 2 Piezometers) 16 2 14
Initial Feasibility Infiltration Tests 15 1 14
Laboratory Evaluations 4 2 2
Engineering Analysis 24 4 16 4
Draft Report 26 4 16 5 1
Final Report 9 2 6 1
Consultations and Meetings 4 2 2
119 14 50 17 30 8
November 18, 2020
Terracon Proposal No. P62205086
TERRACON
TOTAL LABOR HOURS
TERRACON
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
EAGLE RD, LAKE HAZEL RD TO AMITY RD
ADA COUNTY, IDAHO
LABOR HOUR ESTIMATE
11/18/2020
64
Item 8.
ITEM
Estimated
Quantity Unit Price Estimated Cost
Mob-demob/Drilling/Support Equipment, per day 3 300.00$ 900.00$
Drilling, per foot 35 20.00$ 700.00$
5' Pavement borings, Each 3 150.00$ 450.00$
2" Piezos Installed, Each 2 575.00$ 1,150.00$
Perc Borings with 12" Auger, Each 2 350.00$ 700.00$
Moving / Standby 3 175.00$ 525.00$
Support Truck, day 3 150.00$ 450.00$
Flush Mount Surface Completions, Each 2 150.00$ 300.00$
Bentonite, Per Bag 10 8.00$ 80.00$
Sand, Per Bag 12 18.00$ 216.00$
Asphalt Patch, Per Bag 3 25.00$ 75.00$
Off-Site Cutting Disposal 1 200.00$ 200.00$
TOTAL 5,746.00$
* Based on Unit Prices provided by Haz Tech Drilling.
Terracon Proposal No. P62205086
TERRACON
ADA COUNTY, IDAHO
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
EAGLE RD, LAKE HAZEL RD TO AMITY RD
65
Item 8.
ITEM Quantity Unit Price Estimated Cost
Mobilization 2 200.00$ 400.00$
TC Flaggers (4 flaggers for 7 hours)28 26.00$ 728.00$
TC Maintenance 18 28.00$ 504.00$
Delineation (20 cones for 3 days)60 2.00$ 120.00$
Signs for Flagging (12 signs for 1 day)12 2.55$ 30.60$
Signs for Shoulder Closures (6 signs for 3 days)18 2.55$ 45.90$
TOTAL 1,828.50$
Based on a unit rates provided by Idaho Traffic Control on 11/16/2020
Traffic Control
Terracon Proposal No. P62205086
TERRACON
ADA COUNTY, IDAHO
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
EAGLE RD, LAKE HAZEL RD TO AMITY RD
66
Item 8.
MILEAGE ESTIMATE
ROUNDTRIP TOTAL
NO. TRIPS DESTINATION MILEAGE MILEAGE
81296
96ESTIMATED PROJECT TOTAL MILEAGE
Project Site: Boring Layout, Utility Clearance,
Drilling, Initial Percolation Testing, etc.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
EAGLE RD, LAKE HAZEL RD TO AMITY RD
TERRACON
ADA COUNTY, IDAHO
Terracon Proposal No. P62205086
Terracon_Eagle Rd-Lake Hazel to Amity_Hour and Cost Estimate_.xlsx\Travel
11/18/2020
67
Item 8.
November 17, 2020
TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION SERVICES FOR
Precision Engineering
Scope of Services and Cost Proposal
L2 Data Collection (L2DC) is pleased to submit this proposal to provide traffic data collection services in Ada County,
ID.
1. Data Collection: Intersection Turning Movement
Type: Vehicle Volume & Direction
Time: 7-9AM and 4-6PM – 2 days
Classification: No
Day: Weekday (non-holiday)
Locations:
Eagle Road and Taconic Drive
2. Data Collection: Machine Tube Count
Type: Vehicle Volume & Direction
Duration: 48-hours
Classification: No
Day: Weekday (non-holiday)
Locations:
Eagle Road north of Taconic Drive
Eagle Road south of Taconic Drive
Taconic Drive west of Eagle Road
Taconic Drive east of Eagle Road (this leg may need to be counted via the intersection video)
3. Deliverables
The Traffic Data Report will be delivered no later than 5 days after the on-site data collection is completed.
4. Contract and Payment Terms
Payment terms for the services listed above are net 60 days. Client will notify L2DC, prior to authorizing work, if
terms are pay-when-paid.
5. Cost Proposal
The total lump-sum cost for the services listed above is $2,600.00, including travel time, mileage, data collection
and data processing.
68
Item 8.
TAG Budget Estimate
Lake Hazel and Maple Grove
November 16, 2020
Man Hours
Personnel Man hours Hourly Rage Cost
Principal
Investigator/Historian
20 $83.93 $1,678.60
Project
Administration
2 $83.93 $167.86
Clerical 4 $33.00 $132.00
Total 26 $1,978.46
Outside Services Service
Charge
SHPO records
request
$250.00 $250.00
Total $2,228.46
*Hourly rate is a loaded rate and includes overhead.
69
Item 8.
70
Item 8.
71
Item 8.
72
Item 8.
73
Item 8.
MEMO TO TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Agenda Topic on the Transportation Commission Agenda
From: Miranda Carson, Coordination Planner Meeting Date: January 4, 2021
Presenter: Tom LeClaire Estimated Time: 10 minutes
Topic: Ordinance and Development Subcommittee Update
Tom LeClaire will be giving a brief overview of the items discussed at the most recent Ordinance
and Development Subcommittee meeting. The meeting, scheduled for January 4th, 2:15pm, followed
the agenda below.
Agenda:
I. Roll:
_ Tom LeClaire
_ Jared Smith
_ Walter Steed
_ Emily Kane
_ Brandon Frasier
_ David Claiborne
II. All Terrain and Utility Terrain Vehicles (ATV/UTV)
III. Future Topics
IV. Next Meeting
A subcommittee member will also be doing a first reading of the proposed new ATV/UTV
Ordinance for discussion and action by the Transportation Commission.
74
Item 9.
DRAFT – 12/14/2020
ATV, UTV, AND GOLF CART ORDINANCE PAGE 1
TITLE 7
MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC
CHAPTER 5
GOLF CARTS, ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES, AND UTILITY-TYPE VEHICLES
7-5-1: DEFINITIONS:
For the purposes of this chapter, these terms shall be defined as follows:
A. ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE: See definition of ATV in Idaho Code (section 67-7101(1) or
like provision subsequently enacted).
B. GOLF CART: Every self-propelled vehicle upon three (3) or more wheels, in, upon or by
which, any person or property, particularly golf clubs or golf equipment, may be carried or
transported.
C. UTILITY-TYPE VEHICLE (“UTV”): See definition of UTV in Idaho Code (section 67-
7101(17) or like provision subsequently enacted).
7-5-2: OPERATION OF ATVs, UTVs, AND GOLF CARTS ON PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-
WAY:
No person shall operate an ATV, UTV, or golf cart on any public street, sidewalk, pathway, or
alley within the City of Meridian. The following exceptions shall apply:
A. Persons may operate golf carts on streets within the following described approximate square
mile, in which the Lakeview golf course is located: North of the north street right of way line
of Cherry Lane; east of the east street right of way line of Black Cat Road; south of the south
street right of way line of Ustick Road; and west of the west street right of way line of Ten
Mile Road. No person shall operate a golf cart on, or in, the right of way of Cherry Lane,
Black Cat Road, Ustick Road, or Ten Mile Road.
B. The operator of Lakeview golf course and its employees may operate its equipment on
streets, sidewalks, or pathways, while in transit from the storage equipment area to
the golf course.
C. The residents within Meadow Lake Village subdivision shall be allowed to operate golf carts
to travel within the subdivision, which is located south of Franklin Road, east of Eagle Road,
and north of the I-84.
D. Persons may operate golf carts on privately owned land or premises, and on golf courses, as
allowed by the owner or operator thereof.
E. Persons may operate ATVs and UTVs on privately owned land or premises.
75
Item 10.
DRAFT – 12/14/2020
ATV, UTV, AND GOLF CART ORDINANCE PAGE 2
F. Persons may operate ATVs and UTVs, for the limited purpose of loading, unloading, and
testing recent repairs or maintenance, on local streets immediately adjacent to the location at
which the ATV or UTV is loaded, unloaded, repaired, or maintained. No person shall
operate an ATV or UTV on an arterial or collector.
7-5-3: ATV, UTV, AND GOLF CART OPERATION REGULATIONS:
The following regulations shall apply to the operation of an ATV, UTV, or golf cart on a public
street, sidewalk, pathway, or alley:
A. It shall be unlawful for any person who is not a duly licensed motor vehicle driver to drive or
operate an ATV, UTV, or golf cart on a public street, sidewalk, pathway, or alley.
B. It shall be unlawful to operate a golf cart at a speed in excess of fifteen (15) miles per hour.
C. It shall be unlawful to drive or operate an ATV, UTV, or golf cart on a public street,
sidewalk, pathway, or alley while under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
D. It shall be unlawful to operate a ATV, UTV, or golf cart on a public street in a careless or
heedless manner, or without due caution and circumspection or at a speed or in a manner as
to endanger or be likely to endanger any person or property.
E. Persons operating an ATV, UTV, or golf cart shall conform to all vehicular traffic controls
and shall abide by all traffic laws, rules and regulations, including the liability insurance
requirements as set forth in Idaho Code for motor vehicles.
F. It shall be unlawful to operate an ATV, UTV, or golf cart shall be operated on public or
private property unless it is equipped with the following:
1. Brake: At least one brake which may be operated by hand or foot and at least one parking
brake. Such brakes may be controlled by one mechanism but if in one mechanism, the
brake must be capable of being locked on for parking purposes.
2. Muffler: If the golf cart is propelled by an internal combustion engine, it must have a
muffler in good working order and in constant operation to prevent excessive or unusual
noise and annoying smoke. No person shall use a muffler cutout, bypass or similar
device.
7-5-4: PENALTY:
Any person convicted of a violation of this chapter shall be guilty of an infraction, punishable by
a fine of twenty five dollars ($25.00), exclusive of court costs. Drivers operating an ATV, UTV,
or golf cart on public roadways shall be subject to all state and local traffic laws, rules, and
regulations applicable to motor vehicles, and shall be subject to all penalties related to a violation
thereof.
76
Item 10.
MEMO TO TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
From: Miranda Carson, Coordination Planner Meeting Date: January 4, 2021
Presenter: Miranda Carson Estimated Time: 10 minutes
Topic: Staff Communications
Below are relevant correspondences received by City Staff since the December TC meeting.
2nd Street, Broadway to Idaho Vision
From: Caleb Hood
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 10:55 AM
To: Kristy Inselman <Kinselman@achdidaho.org>
Cc: Justin Lucas (Jlucas@achdidaho.org) <Jlucas@achdidaho.org>; Miranda Carson
<mcarson@meridiancity.org>; Cameron Arial <carial@meridiancity.org>
Subject: ACHD Commission Workshop Agenda Request
Kristy,
The City, MDC, the Civic Block developer (Galena) as well as other stakeholders in downtown have been
talking about changing the cross-section of E. 2nd Street, between Broadway and Idaho. We’d like to
present a high-level concept and get initial feedback from the ACHD Commission on this vision; January
20th works best for us. We are not proposing to vacate the right-of-way, but we do envision a one-way,
curbless block and want to make sure the Commission does not see any fatal flaws with this design and
some of the operational changes we envision (we’d like to close the street to motor vehicles from time-to-
time) before we do broader public outreach. GGLO is currently working on exhibits for the meeting, so I
don’t have anything to share at this point, but will send to you once we do get something “solid” to
review.
I’m copying Justin as he has been part of a couple of past meetings on this topic and recommended we
approach the Commission once we have a proposal. (Ross Oyen has also been a part, but I’m not copying
him on this email.) Please let me know if we can address the Commission during a pre-Commission
workshop or similar on January 20th or if you have any questions or concerns with this request or our
approach.
Thank you!
Caleb
Concern about Road Striping at Chinden and Black Cat
77
Item 11.
Hi Renee,
We heard back from Jayme Coonce, Engineering Manager from ITD. Over the week of Dec. 9-16 ITD hired
a contractor to obliterate/remove the old pavement markings from the pavement that were no longer
necessary and were reflecting (especially at night) through the asphalt covering that had been applied
during construction. Ms. Coonce drove the site this morning and observed that the work is complete.
There are no longer any conflicting pavement markings reflecting through however the removal process
has left some shadowing where the old pavement markings were. Ms. Coonce responded that there is
very little that can be done about that right now, and the shadows will fade over time. Her judgment is
that the pavement markings are valid are clearly visible, adequately reflect in headlights, and following
these markings should not cause conflict.
Thanks again for bringing this concern to our attention.
Miranda Carson | Comprehensive Associate Coordination Planner
City of Meridian | Community Development
From: David Miles
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 8:01 AM
To: npierce21@frontier.com; Robert Simison <rsimison@meridiancity.org>
Cc: Josha Iverson <jiverson@meridiancity.org>; Miranda Carson <mcarson@meridiancity.org>; Caleb
Hood <chood@meridiancity.org>
Subject: RE: New submission from Contact the Mayor's Office
Hi Renee,
Thank you for reaching out and sharing your concern about the road striping along Chinden. I know with
new construction being actively worked on that sometimes, the patterns can be a new change and a
surprise to drivers. The City does not have a roads department, rather the roads are managed between
Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) and Ada County Highway District (ACHD). ITD operates the
state highways (like Chinden), while ACHD operates and maintains the local roads. I have copied
Miranda Carson, the City Transportation Planning Coordinator, and ask that she reach out to ITD to
discuss this issue. Miranda can update you on the traffic striping and timelines for the markings to be
fully complete.
Sincerely,
Dave Miles | Chief of Staff
City of Meridian | Mayor’s Office
From: Formspree <noreply@formspree.io>
Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2020 8:55 AM
To: Robert Simison <rsimison@meridiancity.org>
78
Item 11.
Cc: David Miles <dmiles@meridiancity.org>; Josha Iverson <jiverson@meridiancity.org>
Subject: New submission from Contact the Mayor's Office
External Sender - Please use caution with links or attachments.
Hey there,
Someone just submitted your form on meridiancity.org/. Here's what they had to
say:
Ask Mayor Simison:
_replyto:
npierce21@frontier.com
Question or Comment:
The streets along the front of the Fred Meyer shopping center up to Black Cat Road have been
resurfaced, & the lines are very difficult to follow. I almost got into an accident yesterday
because it can be difficult to define the lanes, & I've seen other people having that problem
too. There are the new lines, but all the old lines are still visible & it causes many problems. If
you could black out the old lines somehow, it was help. Would you please talk to the roads
dept about this. Thank you.
name:
Renee Pierce
Phone number:
19512054718
Submitted 03:54 PM - 20 December 2020. Mark as spam
You are receiving this because you confirmed this email address on Formspree. If you don't remember doing
that, or no longer wish to receive these emails, please remove the form on meridiancity.org/ or click here to
unsubscribe from this endpoint.
79
Item 11.
Now open! Comment on a Regional Transportation Project
Now open!
Comment on a proposed transportation study now
Public comment period:
December 28, 2020 - January 11, 2021
Comments are being accepted on a proposed amendment to Communities in
Motion 2040 2.0 (CIM 2040 2.0), the region’s long-range transportation plan,
and the FY2021-2027 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
The amendments to CIM 2040 2.0 and the FY2021-2027 TIP would add an Ada
County Highway District (ACHD) and Idaho Transportation Department (ITD)
joint project to begin preliminary design and an environmental study to replace
the Five Mile Road overpass over Interstate 84 and widen Five Mile Road
between Smoke Ranch Drive and the south side of
the Franklin Road intersection.
Comments must be submitted in writing (via email or letter) and received no
later than Monday, January 11, 2021 at 11:59 pm.
80
Item 11.
How do I submit my comments?
Please direct comments or questions to Toni Tisdale, Principal Planner:
• Email: ttisdale@compassidaho.org
• Mail: COMPASS, 700 NE 2nd Street, Suite 200, Meridian, ID 83642
• Fax: 208/855-2559
Comments due by 11:59pm, Monday, January 11, 2021.
Those needing assistance, including assistance in submitting written comments,
may call 208/855-2558 with 48 hours advance notice.
Personas que necesitan asistencia especial, favor de llamar al número
208/855-2558 con 48 horas de anticipación.
Visit our website
81
Item 11.
Construction Update - New turning movements between Locust Grove and Eagle Road
Chinden West 20/26 Corridor Project Update
ChindenWest - US 20/26 Construction Updates
REMINDER:
New turning movements between Locust Grove and Eagle Road
Locust Grove to Eagle Road:
The Idaho Transportation Department will open four lanes of Chinden Boulevard from Locust Grove to
Eagle Road to traffic by the end of this week, marking a major milestone in the ChindenWest Corridor
project.
As this one-mile section opens to four lane this week, ITD would like to remind motorists and area
residents of the changes now in place at the access points between Locust Grove Road and Eagle
Road:
• Whitepost Way: Right in, Right out
• Bennington Way: Right in, Right out
• Royal Park Ave: Left or Right in, Right out
• Stafford Drive: Left or Right in, Right out
• Shandee Drive: Right in, Right out
These changes will help traffic move through the corridor and provide for safe turning movement to and
from the Banbury and Bristol Heights neighborhoods.
Linder to Locust Grove:
Utility and earth work is underway on the south side of Chinden, between Fox Run Way and Meridian
Road. Pedestrians in this area are detoured to the road shoulder, separated from traffic by a concrete
barrier.
82
Item 11.
Fox Run Way, south of Chinden, is closed through November, from Chinden to Boulder Bar Lane, as
crews remove the overhead structure, widen the roadway and connect the road with the Linder Village
development.
Additionally, the sidewalk on the west side of Fox Run is closed. The east side sidewalk is open for
pedestrian use.
Please travel safely through construction zones!
Click HERE to watch the ChindenWest Corridor overview video!
83
Item 11.
www.ITDProjects.org/ChindenWest
We Want to Hear from You!
Visit www.itdprojects.org/chindenwest to provide comment, ask questions and sign up
for updates.
Stay Informed
For information about the adjacent Ada County Highway District projects on Ten Mile Road,
visit http://www.achdidaho.org/Projects/proj_road_ten-mile-road-mcmillan-road-to-chinden-
boulevard.aspx
84
Item 11.
Please visit www.ITDProjects.org/ChindenWest for up-to-date information and
opportunities to participate. Contact the project team at ChindenWest@itd.idaho.gov
or 208-334-8007.
Chinden West | Idaho Transportation Department | 208-334-8007 | ChindenWest@itd.idaho.gov
Meridian Transportation Commission - Item for February 1st
Hi Caleb:
COMPASS requests time on the February 1st agenda for Meridian Transportation Commission to
provide a presentation on the high-capacity survey. Either Rachel Haukkala or Liisa Itkonen will
present; and we expect the presentation to take 10-15 minutes.
Please let me know if this is possible. ☺
Toni Tisdale | Principal Planner
Resource Development Team Lead
Community Planning Association (COMPASS)
700 NE 2nd Street, Suite 200
Meridian, ID 83642
Direct: 208-475-2238 | Main: 208-855-2558
Cell: 208-440-1109
http://www.compassidaho.org
85
Item 11.
Traffic Safety Concern at Chinden and Black Cat
I spoke with Mr. Ghiorso today and updated him on ITD’s perspective. While there is no defined solution
or commitment at this point, the ITD is working to put together an estimate of what the minimum costs
might be to develop a fix.
We will continue to work the issue through Caleb and Miranda, and will keep Mr. Ghiorso updated.
Dave Miles | Chief of Staff
City of Meridian | Mayor’s Office
From: mark ghiorso <markgo@cableone.net>
Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 6:40 PM
To: Robert Simison <rsimison@meridiancity.org>
Cc: Caleb Hood <chood@meridiancity.org>; David Miles <dmiles@meridiancity.org>
Subject: Re: Traffic Safety Issue at Chinden and Blackcat
External Sender - Please use caution with links or attachments.
Great to hear Robert. Thanks for the timely response.
Look forward to hearing from Caleb and Dave soon.
Mark
From: "rsimison" <rsimison@meridiancity.org>
To: "Mark Ghiorso" <markgo@cableone.net>
Cc: "Caleb Hood" <chood@meridiancity.org>, "David Miles" <dmiles@meridiancity.org>
Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 4:10:03 PM
Subject: RE: Traffic Safety Issue at Chinden and Blackcat
Mr. Ghiorso,
Thank you for your email regarding this situation along Chinden. I was able to speak with Caleb Hood
(who I know you have reached out to) this afternoon to learn more about the situation. Caleb and Dave
Miles from my office will be reaching out to ACHD and ITD to have a conversation about the intersection
to explore options. One of them will follow-up with you to keep you updated once we learn more.
While it is not uncommon for there to be no deacceleration lanes on ITD roadways, there can be a larger
shoulder or intersection footprint that acts as a de-facto lane. Unfortunately this area lacks both items at
86
Item 11.
this time. As this intersection is planned for future improvement with development, I expect trying to find
a way to bridge the area to that eventual project will be the goal in our conversations with both entities.
Have a great evening.
Respectfully,
Mayor Robert Simison
City of Meridian
From: mark ghiorso <markgo@cableone.net>
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2020 7:20 PM
To: Robert Simison <rsimison@meridiancity.org>
Subject: Traffic Safety Issue at Chinden and Blackcat
External Sender - Please use caution with links or attachments.
Robert,
As you know this is a new intersection that's been expanded on Chinden to two West bound and two
East bound lanes. The traffic heading west (from Costco) and taking a right turn (north) onto Blackcat
is in extreme jeopardy due to the fact that there's no right turn lane for safe egress. I along with
several other folks I know have already had close calls and it's inevitable a rear end accident will
happen in the future! Traffic is moving at 60 mph (speed limit is 55) and one has to slow to about 5
mph to make the sharp right hand turn. In the meantime traffic behind you is slamming on the brakes
or swerving into the left lane to miss you. The west bound traffic urgently needs a separate right turn
lane here.
I've spoke to ITD, ACHD and several staff folks working for the City of Meridian. There's been some
finger pointing as to who's responsible for correcting this oversight. At the end of the day it's all
about nobody wants to invest money that's not been allocated to this project. All 3 parties have
claimed they don't have funds available to fix this poorly planned intersection. It will require moving
the 2 small pedestrian posts and the large lighting arterial and paving the edge of the
road. Interestingly, after I brought this issue to everyone's attention somebody went back and
removed a large stretch of new pavement that would have been the right turn lane we're
discussing???
I believe funding ultimately will come from one of the developers building new homes in the area
whether it's CBH or the developer of the new homes on the N/W corner of Blackcat and Chinden, or
the new developer trying to get his multi-use project on the old Jaker's property (N/E corner of
Blackcat and Chinden). While you're all deciding on who will fund this correction we could have an
accident tomorrow. How much $ do we place on a human life?
87
Item 11.
At the end of the day the safety engineer(s) that signed off on this project and the traffic engineer
himself totally missed this poor design. If it had been done correctly from the beginning cost wouldn't
be a factor at all but now it will cost to correct these mistakes. I would advise going up 10 Mile and
taking a left (west) on Chinden and then the first light you come to is Tree Farm. Look at this
correctly designed intersection and note the difference. It, in fact, has a separate right turn lane that
was only installed about 6 months ago, Hmmm?
I'm a 16 year resident of this North Meridian and Eagle area and though I have mixed feelings about
all the growth the overall plan seems to be a sound one. Due to the extreme urgency of this issue,
can you or one of the City Council Members reach out to me and let me know how quickly a remedy
can be provided?
Much Thanks,
Mark Ghiorso
4544 West Sugar Tree Dr.
Meridian, Idaho 83646
m 949-636-3062
SH-69 Traffic Study Public Involvement Complete
The Idaho 69 public involvement summary for the June 29 through July 20, 2020, Virtual Open House has
been completed and is on the project website.
Here is the direct link to the summary. The summary portion is only 5-1/4 pages long and I encourage
your review of it.
The next step of the project will be to contact the City of Kuna and the City of Meridian to discuss land use
implications of design options.
Hoping your holidays meet and exceed expectations,
Mark Wasdahl
Senior Planner
Idaho Transportation Department - District 3
Office: (208) 334-8344 Fax: (208) 334-8917
Email: mark.wasdahl@itd.idaho.gov
UTV Ordinance Public Comment
Hi, Dusty. I have forwarded your message to the City Clerk for response to the portion of your message
requesting dispatch records. The Clerk will forward your message to the Meridian Police Department
records division for processing. It is likely that they will ultimately refer you to Ada County for those
records since dispatch is run by the Sheriff’s Office. Either way you should receive a formal response in
the next week.
88
Item 11.
I made some errors regarding the dates of the Committee’s meetings in my previous message – the
Ordinance Committee met on October 12, November 9, and December 7.
As we have all now learned, the statutes regarding ATVs and UTVs, specifically the provisions regarding
the appropriate scope of municipal regulation are complicated and subject to a number of reasonable
interpretations on initial read. The way that our officers may have understood the code in the past is not
particularly relevant to the current discussion. At this point, I have thoroughly researched the code,
communicated with the transportation authority (ACHD), and provided the committee with legal advice
regarding the correct interpretation of the relevant Idaho Code provisions regarding ATVs and UTVs. In
sum, this is what the state code says:
UTVs are allowed:
• On streets in Meridian that are not controlled access highways, unless they are prohibited by city
ordinance (Idaho Code § 49-426(3));
• On state highways in Meridian with less than 45 mph speed limit, unless prohibited by city ordinance or by
ITD (Idaho Code § 49-426(4)); and
• To cross any state highway in Meridian, regardless of speed limit (Idaho Code § 49-426(4)).
UTVs are prohibited:
• On streets in Meridian that are controlled access highways, regardless of city ordinance (Idaho Code §
49-426(3)); and
• On state highways in Meridian with more than 45 mph speed limit, unless specifically allowed by ITD
(Idaho Code § 49-426(4)).
ACHD is the roadway authority, and they designate which roads are “controlled access highways” (Idaho
Code § 49-109(4)(b)). ACHD has designated arterials and collectors as controlled access highways. This
means that UTVs/ATVs are prohibited on arterials and collectors, and the City is authorized by state code
to regulate/prohibit the use of ATVs and UTVs on local streets.
At their December meeting, the Committee directed me to prepare an ordinance to that effect. They also
requested that I integrate the proposed ATV/UTV regulations with the existing Meridian Code provisions
regarding golf carts (Title 7, Chapter 5). The golf cart ordinance has been in place since 1994, and in its
current iteration since 2004. This draft update to that code, incorporating the requested ATV/UTV
provisions will be considered at the Committee’s next meeting.
This has all happened in noticed meetings, open to the public in person or online. As with all of these
meetings, you are also welcome to attend the January 4 Committee meeting and/or Transportation
Commission meeting. You can access the Commission’s January 4 agenda HERE – it will be posted today
or tomorrow. As previously discussed, you can also subscribe to receive meeting notices via email by
going to the City’s e-mail subscription page, and subscribing to “Agendas and Minutes.” I will forward the
Zoom link and Committee agenda for their January 4 meeting in a separate message. It is in the form of
an Outlook appointment, so please let me know if it doesn’t all come through and I will send it another
way.
89
Item 11.
Mr. Claiborne has attended most of the Committee meetings and provided input as a representative of the
UTV/ATV users’ group. That said, any and all members of your group and/or any member of the public
are also welcome to attend, either in person (City Hall has limited capacity to support physical
distancing), or online via Zoom (links are at the top of the agendas). Written/email comments can also be
sent to Miranda Carson, who provides staff support for the Transportation Commission, at
mcarson@meridiancity.org. She will forward that to the Commissioners for their consideration.
I hope this is helpful. Thank you and please contact me if I may be of further assistance.
Emily
Emily Kane| Deputy City Attorney
City of Meridian | City Attorney’s Office
From: firetech88@q.com <firetech88@q.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 7:51 PM
To: Emily Kane <ekane@meridiancity.org>
Subject: RE: UTV ordinance
Emily,
I have messaged David and he is out of town. I feel that our UTV group has had little to no input into this
matter and Officer Stoys misinterpretation of the Idaho State Code, will lack the input from the user
group. Please help me understand the proposed ordinance that would allow golf carts, which are not even
defined in Idaho Code, will be allowed to drive on certain streets and right of ways, when an ATV/UTV,
which is defined as an actual vehicle (and allowed by State code) to not be allowed within the city limits
other than loading/unloading?? Meridian will be (I will confirm) the only city in ADA or any that I know
of in the state of Idaho that is trying to enact this ordinance. I would also like to obtain the call report
from the Ada County dispatch for the city of Meridian, as to the actual complaints of actual State Code
violations. As per our first discussion involving Officer Stoy, he made several traffic stops and quoted
Meridian City Code violations (which were never in place) and wrote warnings under Idaho Code. I will
get these operators and their warnings if I can locate everyone. I don't disagree that, if someone is
operating in an unsafe manner or not incompliance with Idaho Code, there should be action taken. I will
forward all information to my colleges and hope to have a voice when it comes time for public comment. I
am not sure how this will take place with Covid rules during your meetings, but would like to make sure
that we have people present.
Thank you for your time,
Dusty
-----Original Message-----
From: Emily Kane <ekane@meridiancity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 2:49 PM
To: D. Ballantyne <firetech88@q.com>
Subject: RE: UTV ordinance
Hi, Dusty. The Ordinance Committee of the Transportation Commission met on November 2 and
December 7. At those meetings, they discussed the scope of the City's ability to regulate UTV/ATVs (with
input from me), and also took input from Meridian Police Department and David Claiborne on behalf of
the UTV group regarding whether and how to regulate. At their December meeting, the committee asked
90
Item 11.
me to prepare a draft ordinance incorporating certain provisions regarding ATVs/UTVs into the existing
Meridian golf cart code, and the result was the attached draft. This has been forwarded to the committee
members, and they are going to discuss this draft at their next committee meeting, which will be on
January 4, at 2:15pm. I believe the Transportation Commission may discuss the draft at their meeting
later that same day, but I haven't seen their agenda so you would want to confirm that when the agenda
is noticed, which should happen by December 31. I hope this is helpful and that you are enjoying the
holiday season.
Thanks for your message.
Emily
Emily Kane| Deputy City Attorney
City of Meridian | City Attorney's Office
-----Original Message-----
From: D. Ballantyne <firetech88@q.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2020 9:30 AM
To: Emily Kane <ekane@meridiancity.org>
Subject: UTV ordinance
Happy Holidays Emily!
Could you brief me on the current position of the proposed UTV/Golf cart proposal? I have not heard
anything and wound like to stay informed.
Best regards,
Dusty.
91
Item 11.