Loading...
Applicaton Hearing Date: January 7, 2021 Planner: Alan Tiefenbach File No.: H-2020-0112 Project Name: Tetherow Crossing Subdivision Request:  Annexation & zoning of 7.58 acres of land from RUT in Ada County to the R-8 zoning district; AND  Preliminary plat consisting of 46 building lots and 8 common lots on 13.99 acres of land in the proposed R-8 zoning district, by Hayden Homes Idaho, LLC. Location: The site is located northeast of N. Linder Rd and W. Ustick Rd. in the SW ¼ of the SW ¼ of Section 36, Township 4N., Range 1W. Charlene Way From:clerk@meridiancity.org Sent:Monday, November 30, 2020 8:05 AM To:Charlene Way Subject:Development Application Transmittals - Tetherow Crossing Sub. AZ, PP H-2020-0112 To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Development Application Transmittal Link to Project Application: Tetherow Crossing Subdivision AZ, PP H-2020-0112 Hearing Date: January 7th, 2021 Assigned Planner: Alan To view the City of Meridian Public Records Repository, Click Here The above “Link to Project Application” will provide you with any further information on the project. The City of Meridian is requesting comments and recommendations on the application referenced above. To review the application and project information please click on the application link above. The City of Meridian values transparency and makes a variety of information available to the public online through our public records repository. We request that you submit your comments or recommendations prior to the hearing date specified above. When responding, please reference the file number of the project. If responding by email, please send comments to cityclerk@meridiancity.org. For additional information associated with this application please contact the City of Meridian Planner identified above at 208-884-5533. Thank you, 1 Planning Division EI DIA �1T------,l HEARING APPLICATION i A kO Type of Review Requested Hearing File number: H-2020-0112 Assigned Planner: Alan Tiefenbach Related Files: Applicant Information Applicantname: HAYDEN HOMES IDAHO, LLC Phone: 208-501-8099 Applicant address: 1406 N. MAIN STREET, STE. 114, MERIDIAN, ID 83642 Email: mgregory@hayden-homes.com Ownername: DENNIS CREEK Phone: Fax: 770 E. CLEAR CREEK DR., MERIDIAN, ID tmokwa@hayden-homes.com Owner address: 83646 Email: Agent name(e.g.architect,engineer,developer,representative): ROSS ERICKSON Firmname: ERICKSON CIVIL INC Phone: 2088673954 Fax: Address: 6213 N CLOVERDALE ROAD SUITE 125 Email: ross@ericksoncivil.com Contactname: HAYDEN HOMES IDAHO, LLC Phone: 208-501-8099 Fax: Contact address: 1406 N. MAIN STREET, STE. 114 Email: mgregory@hayden-homes.com Subject Property Information Location/street address: Assessor's parcel number(s): SO436336156 Township,range,section: 4N 1 W36 Project Description Project/ApplicationName: Tetherow Crossing Subdivision -AZ, PP Description of Work: See Attached Project Narrative. 33 E Broadway Avenue,Suite 102 • Meridian,Idaho 83642 Phone:(208)884-5533 • Facsimile:(208)888-6854 • Website:www.meridaincity.org 1 Application Information APPLICATION TYPES Annexation and Zoning-AZ: CHECKED AZ-Staff Prepared Consensual: No Preliminary Plat-PP: CHECKED ADDRESS VERIFICATION Address Verification Permit Number: LDAV-2020-0676 TYPE OF USE PROPOSED Residential: CHECKED Single-Family Detached: CHECKED PROPERTY INFORMATION General Location: Linder& UStick Current Land Use: RUT Total Acreage: 7.58 Traffic Study Required per ACHD: No ZONING DISTRICT(S) R-8: CHECKED FLUM DESIGNATION(S) Medium Density Residential: CHECKED Acreage-Medium Density Res: 7.58 PROJECT INFORMATION Elevations Date(MM/DD/YYYY): N/A Percentage of Site Devoted to Building: N/A Percentage of Site Devoted to Landscaping: N/A Percentage of Site Devoted to Paving: N/A Who will own and Maintain the Pressurized Irrigation System in this Development: HOA Irrigation District: NMI D Primary Irrigation Source: SURFACE WATER Secondary Irrigation Source: WELL Square Footage of Landscaped Areas to be Irrigated by City Water Connection: 0 Minimum Square Footage of Ground Floor Area for Multi-Story Units: N/A Proposed Building Height: R-8 Existing Floor Area(If Applicable): N/A Gross Floor Area Proposed: N/A Hours of Operation(Days and Hours): N/A Number of Standard Parking Spaces Provided: N/A Number of Compact Parking Spaces Provided: N/A Number of Residential Units: 46 Minimum Square Footage of Living Area(Excluding Garage): N/A 33 E Broadway Avenue,Suite 102 • Meridian,Idaho 83642 Phone:(208)884-5533 • Facsimile:(208)888-6854 • Website:www.meridaincity.org 3 Gross Density: 6.07 Net Density: 10.28 What was the date of your pre-application meeting?: 10/06/2020 What was the date of your neighborhood meeting?: 10/15/2020 In Reclaimed Water Buffer: No PROPERTY POSTING I agree to comply with the Commitment of Property Posting regulations per UDC 11- CHECKED 5A-6D: AZ/RZ ONLY R-8: CHECKED Acreage-R-8: 7.58 PLATS ONLY Number of Building Lots: 46 Number of Common Lots: 8 Total Number of Lots: 54 Minimum Lot Size: 4000 Average Lot Size: 4236 Area of Plat: 7.58 Plat Date(MM/DD/YYYY): 10/16/2020 QUALIFYING OPEN SPACE Open Grassy Area(min.50'x 100'): CHECKED Other Qualified Open Space: Tot Lot, Benches/Sitting Area, Pet Station Acres of Qualified Open Space: 44428 Percentage of Qualified Open Space: 13.46 QUALIFYING SITE AMENITIES Other Qualified Site Amenities: Tot Lot, Benches/Sitting Area, Pet Station TIME EXTENSION INFORMATION Number of months extension: 24 APPLICATION DISCLAIMER I have read and accept the above terms: CHECKED Your signature: Ross Erickson MISC Is new record: No 33 E Broadway Avenue,Suite 102 • Meridian,Idaho 83642 Phone:(208)884-5533 • Facsimile:(208)888-6854 • Website:www.meridaincity.org 5 Planning Division EI DIA �1T------,l HEARING APPLICATION i A kO Type of Review Requested Hearing File number: H-2020-0112 Assigned Planner: Related Files: Applicant Information Applicantname: HAYDEN HOMES IDAHO, LLC Phone: 208-501-8099 Applicant address: 1406 N. MAIN STREET, STE. 114, MERIDIAN, ID 83642 Email: mgregory@hayden-homes.com Ownername: DENNIS CREEK Phone: Fax: 770 E. CLEAR CREEK DR., MERIDIAN, ID tmokwa@hayden-homes.com Owner address: 83646 Email: Agent name(e.g.architect,engineer,developer,representative): ROSS ERICKSON Firmname: ERICKSON CIVIL INC Phone: 2088673954 Fax: Address: 6213 N CLOVERDALE ROAD SUITE 125 Email: ross@ericksoncivil.com Contactname: HAYDEN HOMES IDAHO, LLC Phone: 208-501-8099 Fax: Contact address: 1406 N. MAIN STREET, STE. 114 Email: mgregory@hayden-homes.com Subject Property Information Location/street address: Assessor's parcel number(s): SO436336156 Township,range,section: 4N 1 W36 Project Description Project/ApplicationName: Tetherow Crossing Subdivision -AZ, PP Description of Work: See Attached Project Narrative. 33 E Broadway Avenue,Suite 102 • Meridian,Idaho 83642 Phone:(208)884-5533 • Facsimile:(208)888-6854 • Website:www.meridaincity.org 1 Application Information APPLICATION TYPES Annexation and Zoning-AZ: CHECKED AZ-Staff Prepared Consensual: No Preliminary Plat-PP: CHECKED ADDRESS VERIFICATION Address Verification Permit Number: LDAV-2020-0676 TYPE OF USE PROPOSED Residential: CHECKED Single-Family Detached: CHECKED PROPERTY INFORMATION General Location: Linder& UStick Current Land Use: RUT Total Acreage: 7.58 Traffic Study Required per ACHD: No ZONING DISTRICT(S) R-8: CHECKED FLUM DESIGNATION(S) Medium Density Residential: CHECKED Acreage-Medium Density Res: 7.58 PROJECT INFORMATION Elevations Date(MM/DD/YYYY): N/A Percentage of Site Devoted to Building: N/A Percentage of Site Devoted to Landscaping: N/A Percentage of Site Devoted to Paving: N/A Who will own and Maintain the Pressurized Irrigation System in this Development: HOA Irrigation District: NMI D Primary Irrigation Source: SURFACE WATER Secondary Irrigation Source: WELL Square Footage of Landscaped Areas to be Irrigated by City Water Connection: 0 Minimum Square Footage of Ground Floor Area for Multi-Story Units: N/A Proposed Building Height: R-8 Existing Floor Area(If Applicable): N/A Gross Floor Area Proposed: N/A Hours of Operation(Days and Hours): N/A Number of Standard Parking Spaces Provided: N/A Number of Compact Parking Spaces Provided: N/A Number of Residential Units: 46 Minimum Square Footage of Living Area(Excluding Garage): N/A 33 E Broadway Avenue,Suite 102 • Meridian,Idaho 83642 Phone:(208)884-5533 • Facsimile:(208)888-6854 • Website:www.meridaincity.org 3 Gross Density: 6.07 Net Density: 10.28 What was the date of your pre-application meeting?: 10/06/2020 What was the date of your neighborhood meeting?: 10/15/2020 In Reclaimed Water Buffer: No PROPERTY POSTING I agree to comply with the Commitment of Property Posting regulations per UDC 11- CHECKED 5A-6D: AZ/RZ ONLY R-8: CHECKED Acreage-R-8: 7.58 PLATS ONLY Number of Building Lots: 46 Number of Common Lots: 8 Total Number of Lots: 54 Minimum Lot Size: 4000 Average Lot Size: 4236 Area of Plat: 7.58 Plat Date(MM/DD/YYYY): 10/16/2020 QUALIFYING OPEN SPACE Open Grassy Area(min.50'x 100'): CHECKED Other Qualified Open Space: Tot Lot, Benches/Sitting Area, Pet Station Acres of Qualified Open Space: 44428 Percentage of Qualified Open Space: 13.46 QUALIFYING SITE AMENITIES Other Qualified Site Amenities: Tot Lot, Benches/Sitting Area, Pet Station TIME EXTENSION INFORMATION Number of months extension: 24 APPLICATION DISCLAIMER I have read and accept the above terms: CHECKED Your signature: Ross Erickson MISC Is new record: No 33 E Broadway Avenue,Suite 102 • Meridian,Idaho 83642 Phone:(208)884-5533 • Facsimile:(208)888-6854 • Website:www.meridaincity.org 5 a November 91h, 2020 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Tetherow Crossing Subdivision—Preliminary Plat& Re-Zone Applications Dear Mayor and Council, As representative for Hayden Homes Idaho, LLC, we respectfully request that the City accepts the attached Preliminary Plat application for the Tetherow Crossing Subdivision. The application includes a Preliminary Plat and Re-Zone for an existing 7.58 acre parcel located along W. Ustick Rd.,just east of N. Linder Rd., in Meridian, Idaho. The property is currently located in Ada County with a rural transition (RUT) zoning designation and is proposed to be re-zoned to R-8. The project is an infill development and includes a proposal for approval of 46 single-family, detached, building lots and 8 common lots with a project gross density of 6.07 units per acre. The enclosed application has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Meridian City Code (M.C.C.). Rezone The property is requested to be zoned R-8 with a gross density of 6.07 units/acre, which is consistent with the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation of medium density residential that allows for 3-8 units/acre. The property is bordered to the west by the Edington Commons residential subdivision (R-15). and an undeveloped mixed-use parcel zoned C-C located at the hard corner of N. Linder Rd. and W. Ustick Rd. The property is bordered to the east by the Woodburn West Subdivision (R-8), and an undeveloped parcel zoned R-8. The property is bordered to the north by an undeveloped medium density residential parcel, and to the south by W. Ustick Rd. The proposed R-8 zoning designation is an appropriate land use for this parcel and will be a harmonious addition to the adjacent land uses and surrounding area. Preliminary Plat Building Lots and Density The project includes 46 single family detached homes and 8 common lots with a gross density of 6.07 units per acre. The proposed building lots range in size from 4,000 sq. ft.to 5,823 sq. ft., with an average size of 4,236 sq.ft. The development will include public streets, public utility infrastructure, a pressure irrigation system, qualified open space, and site amenities. Building setbacks will be as per the M.C.C. for an R-8 zoning designation. 6213 N.Cloverdale Road,Suite 125 Boise,Idaho 83713 T.208.846.8955, F.208.846.8956 Roadways and Access All streets will be public and will be constructed to Ada County Highway District (ACHD) standards. Access will be taken from two existing street stubs (W. Woodpine St.) located at the west and east ends of the project. A new access with be constructed to W. Ustick Rd. that will align with NW 121n Dr. across W. Ustick Rd. New stub streets will be constructed to the undeveloped parcels to the north and to the east. We've reviewed the specifics of the proposed development access arrangement, and the internal street design, with ACHD without objection to our proposal. The project internal street design includes a 33-foot street section (parking on both sides)with 5- foot wide attached sidewalks. Concrete pedestrian micro-pathways are provided within the large central common area, and within a pedestrian connection to the mixed-use residential property to the southwest of the site. Open Space, Common Areas& Landscaping The Meridian City Code requires that the proposed development provides 10%qualified open space and (1) amenity. The project proposal exceeds the minimum requirements and provides 13.46% qualified open space and through: 1. A 0.77 acre centrally located common area that is greater than 50' x 100' (Lot 1, Block 6) that will include an open grass play area, micro pathways, a children's play structure, a trash can and sitting benches. This feature serves as a central common area within the development that can be utilized by residents and their children to gather and recreate. 2. A sitting area located on Lot 1 of Block 3 that includes a bench, trash can and a pet station. The lot will be landscaped with grass and can be utilized for open play. 3. A micro-path pedestrian connection from the development to the future mixed-use residential parcel to the west. All landscaping and amenities located within common lots and will be owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association that will be established for the subdivision. Shared Driveways The subdivision includes shared driveways for Lots 15, 16 & 17 of Block 3. Shared driveway requirements, including easements, and landscaping and a concrete pad for trash cans will be provided in accordance with the M.C.C. Stormwater Drainage Project storm water from the ACHD right-of-way will be detained on site within subsurface drainage facilities located within common lots across the site. Lawn will be planted over the stormwater drainage facilities with the common lots and will not impede the ability to utilize the common lots as qualified open space. Drainage facilities will be designed in accordance with the ACHD requirements. Water&Sewer The subdivision will be served by the City of Meridian municipal water and sewer system. A connection to the City's potable water system is available at each end of W. Woodpine St. Water will be stubbed to the vacant mixed-use residential parcel located to the southwest of the site in accordance with the City of Meridian Public Works Dept. request. City sanitary sewer will be 6213 N.Cloverdale Road,Suite 125 Boise,Idaho 83713 T.208.846.8955, F.208.846.8956 extended from the existing sewer stub located within the W. Woodpine St., and from an existing gravity sewer located in W. Ustick Rd. Pressure Irrigation The project will include a pressure irrigation system to serve all lots. The system will be owned and operated by the homeowner's association. Surface water is delivered to the site at the southeast corner of the parcel along W. Ustick Rd. Back-up pressure irrigation will be provided from a metered, backflow protected, connection to the City's potable water system. The Tetherow Crossing Subdivision will be a quality and compatible addition to the immediate area and the City of Meridian. The project will benefit the public interest by providing desirable, diverse housing needs to this area of the City, while allowing for the continued improvement and expansion of public services. We look forward to working with you and your staff and request approval of this project. Please feel free to contact me at (208) 867-3954 with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Erickson-Evil, Inc. Ros E E. Project Manager 6213 N.Cloverdale Road,Suite 125 Boise,Idaho 83713 T.208.846.8955, F.208.846.8956 CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXATION TETHEROW CROSSING SUBDIVISION 1/4 LOCATED IN THE SW 114 OF THE SW 114 OF SECTION 36, TAN., R.1 W., B.M. 356136 CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNY, IDAH❑ o I p m z I N89.51'54"E 274.59' W OpINE 5�. I � �n �I w 125.4s se?01'42»E zl ----------- tV _ N I CO PROPOSED ANNEXATION w 8.12 ACRES AL LAIvo Iz - 574 co c� D ' 11118 n Nn MOO.�. `j 9rF 0 F SOP 5� NP a TON W•oC� POINT OF o BEGINNING 0 35 3fi 665.63' 1�4 36 172.23' 1331.09' 2 1 W. USTICK RD. N88.43'02"w 493.39' - w ... ............................... S88'43'02"E 2662,34' BASES 4 BEARING... ..... 0' 75' 150' 300' Lan futiol-As Land Surveying and Consulting 231 E.STH ST.,STE A MERIDIAN,ID 83642 (208)288-2040 (208)288-2557 tax www.landsoiulions.6ix '.0 r•il- i Legal Description Proposed Annexation Tetherow Crossing Subdivision A parcel being located in the SW %4 of the SW'/4 of Section 36, Township 4 North, Range 1 West. Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a Brass Cap monument marking the southwest corner of said Section 36, from which a Brass Cap monument marking the southeast corner of the SW'/4 of said Section 36 bears S 88043'02' E a distance of 2662.34 feet; Thence along the southerly boundary of said SW '/ S 88°43'02" E a distance of 665.63 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence leaving said southerly boundary N 0­17'23" E a distance of 46.00 feet to a point on the northerly right-of-way of W. Ustick Road. Thence continuing N 0017'23" E a distance of 787.24 feet to a point. Thence N 89051754" E a distance of 274.59 feet to a point on the westerly boundary of Woodburn West Subdivision No. 2 as shown in Book 111 of Plats on Pages 16040 through 16044: records of Ada County, Idaho; Thence along said westerly boundary of Woodburn Vilest Subdivision No. 2 the following described courses, Thence S 14045'42" E a distance of 356.68 feet to a point; Thence S 81001'42' E a distance of 125.46 feet to a point; Thence leaving said westerly boundary S 0°02'28" W a distance of 434.45 feet to a point on said northerly right-of-way of W. Ustick Road; Thence continuing S 0°02'28" W a distance of 48.00 feet to a point on the southerly boundary of the SW 1/4 of the SW '/4 of said Section 36; Thence along said southerly boundary N 88°43'02" W a distance of 493.39 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 8.12 acres and is subject to any easements Gy�N�� LA Np existing or in use. - S ER pZ_ Clinton W. Hansen, PLS g Land Solutions; PC �1 0 �go f zo t� � October 6. 2020 �� �r� o F \o� �/ �TDN W NPR Lai 5olu-Boris Dennis Creels Subdivision Sarno surveying and consue+ny Annexation Desciption job No.20-43 WARRAN`I`Y DEM) 704 725 f-or Value Rcccivrd 1'(J1dEL1. UT'l!; DEilil`:' .,n:] [•F:;l?'1 t'IG`aYLl;li: Ut;tl:tl, husband and wife, the grantor s,do hereby grant,bargain,yell and convey uttin DENNIS C_ CREEK, an unmarried person, the grantee whose ctirienl addrev%k 774 Clear Creek Drive, Meridian, Idaho, 83642, the following described inernrses,in Acla ('+aunty td.the,,1 -wit: All o[ that certain roal Property more particularly described on Exhibit nC" attached hereto and made a part hereof. I Ii i TO EAVI` AND !O HOLD thr ,,ml pTcsnl',CS. w1111 iheir .1111)trlellartce. tint, the ..nd l;r.uttte E his 110ITS and a"igll� lurctrr. And the %.ml t;rarilrat s do hurl,%_' :ovcn.ini to and wdh 111c said grantee , Olaf tlicy areu,vncr5 ut lcc'crteplr ral .aial pi-ciiitati. that Hwy sit twv' I from all iacunihrinccs except the aforementioned taxes and assessments and a Certain Deed of Trust of October 1, 1971, executed by grantors to James E_ 5chille4 as Trustee for flome Federal Savings & Loan Association of N mpa s Seneff ciar , recorded October 1, 1971, as instrument No. 784758 Tecords of Ada County, Idaho; and that tlity will wartanl and d0Cnd 111c ,anu'liom all I:nr lul tlaml,whalvit,wr 1?ated: June >> "-1 1978 C� I Lowell Otis Denny � Mary Criar ine Uenny — STATE OF IDAHO.COUNTY OF ADA SrATF tip IDAHO. COUNTY OF On the Z)'•' day of , ]:a 78, ( h.rvhy t-i-tiry that Ihi; enst,vne•nf uas fi)—i fr,r iPrnrd at I1 6e4aae inn,:a nniary pubic m and for 4 tai+-.errs„nail} i}n rrquPct ,( I S apprarrd LOWELL OTIS DENNY and -�rtttl;J llf� i 1 Ifii?.t`ZS:,CHARLINE DENNY, r 3�j ,+,ut i }+ast jv'L rr n•rk�, �z m.. htasban and wife, thr4 j� day r 1:, y ( .sn pi;•nSTie,.and duly rerwile,r!m tla„k kmiaa•nru.m-ii br the:pxrZon S S t subsrr:bia'[ u�n ru ,) hL kia fisirnrnt.and a l.•da;rkn..a. nd t.• `�t �4 'fk'•1,' r:rruerd tt„- .a,,,, 1�fz-CtSTiria, ltccnrs;e,r ✓xvrnry rnhnr Kcsu!inF xt R{JiSC •Idahu pr•,s j. f lj�' G n�put}- e Conioa. Expires Y -3 p Mail tom: 704 72(; EXHIBIT "C" That portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 36, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the section corner common to Sections 35 and 36, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, and to Sec- tions 1 and 2, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian; thence South 88057150" East along the section line 665.56 feet to the real point of beginning; thence South 88157'50" East along said section line 493.44 feet to a point; thence North 0012120" West 30.01 feet to an existing steel pin; thence North 0°12120" West 452.44 feet to an existing steel pin in the center line of a certain drain canal; thence North 81°16'30" west along said center line 125.46 feet to an existing steel pin; thence North 15°00130" West along the center line 356.84 feet to a point; thence North 89056'50" West 250.00 feet, more or less, to a point; thence South 0103'10" West 835.12 feet to the real point of beginning; _ Together with all and singular the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining; Subject to all easements and rights-of- way of record or appearing on the land; Subject, -so, to taxes and assessments levied and assessed for the year 1978 which are now liens but not yet due nor payable. s4 EXHIBIT "C" L; �� —, AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST STATE OF IDAHO ) COUNTY OF ADA ) I, Dennis Creek 770 E. Clear Creek Dr. (name) (address) Meridian Idaho 83646 (city) (state) being first duly sworn upon, oath,depose and say: 1. That I am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and 1 grant my permission to: Hayden Homes Idaho LLC Tim Mokwa 1406 N. Main St, Suite 109, Meridian, ID 83642 (name) (address) to submit the accompanying application(s)pertaining to that property. 2. I agree to indemnify, defend and hold the City of Meridian and its employees harmless from any claim or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements contained herein or as to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application. 3. I hereby grant penmission to City of Meridian staff to enter the subject property for the purpose of site inspections related to processing said application(s). Dated this 7day ofal 8 , 20 Z-,=) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written. KIAHNI FREEMAN (Notary Public for Idaho) COMMISSION#20201674 NOTARY PUBLIC Q� 06LI' STATE OF IDAHO Residing at:._&� e 1 U My Commission Expires: (Rev 05129 20) m o Anton 0r � � N y n z V m m „ Z z t, Q n m W Ashto t Blake St Sawtooth Middle School �D` n > W Ashto,Ur a � uiet Peak St Z E7 z W Ashby Dr � m a z W Apple P/fie z ti g m a p t Z f 7 y n w a W Woodpine S1 a Q - ry J e � Z Wrgd b�h� z Chevron 0 D Z w ustick Rd U W.USTICK RD. 19 w ustick Rd 4 w u t Z r- Premier Kids CL Preschool&Childcare tone St k. :0c a n W Park stone Sr sin NORTH p _ PROJECT SITE N Vicinity Map Ross Erickson From: Mindy Wallace <Mwallace@achdidaho.org> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 9:14 AM To: Ross Erickson Subject: RE: Tetherow Sub. - TIS Requirement Hi Ross, A traffic impact study is not required for this application. Mindy Mindy Wallace,AICP Planning Review Supervisor Ada County Highway District 208-387-6178 ACHD Development Services is open for business at our new location at 1301 N. Orchard Street, Suite 200 in the CSC building. Parking and building entrance are located on west side of building. From: Ross Erickson <ross@ericksoncivil.com> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2020 9:49 AM To: Mindy Wallace <Mwallace@achdidaho.org> Subject:Tetherow Sub. -TIS Requirement [THIS EMAIL ORIGINATED EXTERNALLY. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN OPENING ATTACHMENTS OR LINKS INSIDE THIS EMAIL.] CAUTION:This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Mindy—Could you please forward me an email confirming that a TIS will not be required for the Tetherow Subdivision (46 Building Lots). Thanks, RE Ro ss Eric kso n,PE Erickson C -i7i1,fic. 6213N.Cbvexdab Rd.Su$e 125 Bow,Ylaho 83713 C 208.867.3954 T208.846.8955 F208.846.8956 ms:@ eZcksonciTlcom www zii--ksonci7iLcom 1 Ross Erickson From: noreply@meridiancity.org Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 9:29 AM To: tmokwa@hayden-homes.com; Ross Erickson;tricks@meridiancity.org; rbeecroft@meridiancity.org Subject: Address Verification Complete Address verification is complete for record LDAV-2020-0676 Project:Tetherow Crossing Sub. Parcel(s): SO436336156 Lot: null Block: null Subdivision: 4N 1W 36 Comments: Parcel verification City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-888-4433 www.meridiancity.org All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in regards to both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law. i CITY OF MERIDIAN PRE-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES ProjectlSubdivision Name: Tetherow Crossing Subdivision (Formerly Dennis Creek) Date: 10/6/2020 Staff: Joe Dodson,Tom Walsh, Bill Parsons,Amanda McNutt, Joe Bongiorno. Applicant(s)/Contact(s): Tim Mokwa—Hayden Homes; Ross Erickson—Erickson Civil; Location: Parcel#SO436336156: Near NEC of Ustick and Linder, north side of Ustick Size of Property: 7.6 ac. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Medium Density Residential (3-8 du/ac) Existing Use: VacanVAg Existing Zoning: RUT Proposed Use: Residential(46 lots as one phase) Proposed Zoning: R-15 Surrounding Uses: Residential to the west, north, east and south;Vacant lot abuts the property in the SW corner(zoned C-C). Street Buffer(s)and/or Land Use Buffer(s): 25-foot landscape buffer to Ustick Road. Open Space/Amenities/Pathways: Minimum 10% open space and one (1)site amenity per the standards in UDC 11-3G-3.Applicant is proposing micro-paths to the vacant lot abutting the SWC and additional pathway along a user's ditch (shown as Lemp Canal on GIS) that connects to attached sidewalks on proposed local streets. Access/Stub Streets: Proposed access is via public local street extension of W.Woodpine St. in NEC of site,from existing Woodburn West Subdivision and to Ustick Rd. in line with NW 12th Dr. on the south side of Ustick.Applicant is proposing to continue this street through site to the west to meet with future stub from Edington Commons (H-2019-0109). Public street stub to existing residence directly to the north is shown as well as a stub to the east property zoned R-4 but not redeveloped. Waterways/Flood plain/Topography/Hazards: None on site but there is a User's Facility abutting the site along the northeast boundary. User's ditch is not regulated by any irrigation district.Work with HOA of Woodburn West Sub. on tiling the ditch to make area more usable. History: AZ/PP-06-030—Application was denied by City Council in 2006. Additional Meeting Notes: Staff recommends reviewing location/design of open space. Code dictates that whenever feasible, open space is to be centrally located within developments (UDC 11-3G-3). Open space as proposed is not necessarily wrong but if there is a way to consolidate more of the open space into the larger central area, Staff supports this and likely so would Commission/Council. Staff recommends submitting parking plan with application materials to show any available quest parking beyond required minimums. Staff recommends submitting a conceptual plan for how the properties to the north could develop off of the proposed stub street to the north. No more than 30 homes will be allowed occupancy until such time that two accesses are built. PUBLIC WORKS—Continue working with Tyson Glock on any sewer issues;sewer serving common drives must be private or individual service lines if common drive is serving more than 3 homes. Contact AI Christy for Street light requirements along W. Ustick Road; internal streets will require street lights per City Standards. If layout changes significantly, please schedule a new pre-application meeting.Any layout changes should be sent to Planning prior to application submittal. Note:A Traffic Impact Study(TIS)will be required by ACHD for large commercial projects and any residential development with over 100 units. To avoid unnecessary delays&expedite the hearing process,applicants are encouraged to submit the TIS to ACHD prior to submitting their application to the City.Not having ACHD comments and/or conditions on large projects may delay hearing(s)at the City.Please contact Mindy Wallace at 387-6178 or Christy Little at 387-6144 at ACHD for information in regard to a TIS,conditions,impact fees and process. Other Agencies/Departments to Contact: ❑ Ada County Highway Dist. (ACHD) ❑ Nampa Meridian Irrigation Dist.(NMID) ❑ Public Works Department ❑ Idaho Transportation Dept.(ITD) ❑ Settler's Irrigation District ❑ Building Department ❑ Republic Services ❑ Police Department ❑ Parks Department,Kim Warren ❑ Central District Health Department ❑ Fire Department ❑ Other: Application(s)Required: ❑ Administrative Design Review ❑ Conditional Use Permit Modification/Transfer ❑ Rezone ❑ Alternative Compliance ❑ Development Agreement Modification ❑ Short Plat ® Annexation ❑ Final Plat ❑ Time Extension—Council ❑ City Council Review ❑ Final Plat Modification ❑ UDC Text Amendment ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment—Map ❑ Planned Unit Development ❑ Vacation ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment—Text ® Preliminary Plat ❑ Variance ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Private Street ❑ Other Notes: 1)Applicants are required to hold a neighborhood meeting in accord with UDC 11-5A-5C prior to submittal of an application requiring a public hearing(except for a vacation or short plat);and 2)All applicants for permits requiring a public hearing shall post the site with a public hearing notice in accord with UDC 11-5A-5D.3(except for UDC text amendments, Comp Plan text amendments, and vacations). The information provided during this meeting is based on current UDC requirements and the Comprehensive Plan.Any subsequent changes to the UDC and/or Comp Plan may affect your submittal and/or application. This pre-application meeting shall be valid for four(4)months. Tetherow Crossing Subdivision Neighborhood Meeting Sign-in LOCATION: ONSITE 6:30 PM, MST Thursday October 15'h, 2020 Name Tel. Email Address 1 Ross Erickson 208,867.3954 ross@ericksoncivil.com 6123 N. Cloverdale Rd.#125 Boise, ID 83712 2 Tim Mokwa 208.869.9785 tmokwa@Hayden- Homes.com 3a�`e I�� A - ZO a 3 � 273 t-C 7_3 ,-' cz, l.CO 4 sly, �s S Z�ads 5 l- 04L 1 C L�'- ZC� �1Z P�� tcS cz 'v'�' �Nt-� 11J1 7t'.Zi� 4 �� 6 3-1 1 3.7 k) P�la�t' Ate_ ��4 , Z- P> G 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Ross Erickson From: Sub Name Mail <subnamemail@adacounty.id.gov> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 10:03 AM To: Ross Erickson Cc: 'Clint Hansen' Subject: RE: Tetherow Crossing Subdivision Name Reservation September 8, 2020 Clint Hansen, Land Solutions Ross Erickson, Erickson Civil RE: Subdivision Name Reservation: TETHEROW CROSSING SUBDIVISION At your request, I will reserve the name Tetherow Crossing Subdivision for your project. I can honor this reservation only as long as your project is in the approval process. Final approval can only take place when the final plat is recorded. This reservation is available for the project as long as it is in the approval process unless the project is terminated by the client, the jurisdiction or the conditions of approval have not been met, in which case the name can be re-used by someone else. Sincerely, Glen Smallwood Surveying Technician i Ada County Development Services 200 W. Front St., Boise, ID 83702 (208)287-7926 office (208)287-7909 fax From: Ross Erickson <ross@ericksoncivil.com> Sent:Thursday, September 3, 2020 3:35 PM To: Sub Name Mail <subnamemail@adacounty.id.gov> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Tetherow Crossing Subdivision - Name Reservation CAUTION:This email originated from outside Ada County email servers. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.Verify the sender by mouse-hovering over their display name in order to see the sender's full email address and confirm it is not suspicious. If you are unsure an email is safe, please report the email by using the Thish Alert' button in Outlook. Good Afternoon - I would like to reserve the subdivision name "Tetherow Crossing Subdivision"for a new subdivision in Meridian, ID, 4N, 1W, SEC 36. The parcel number is SO436336156. The developer is Hayden Homes Idaho, LLC. Surveyor is Clint Hansen with Land Solutions, 208.288.2040. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information to complete our request. i Thanks, RE Ro ss Eric kso n,PE Erickson C i7j1, Tnc. 6213 N.0 bvexda-b Rd.Su$e 125 Bow,Haho 83713 C 208.867.3954 T208.846.8955 F208.846.8956 mss@ eijz!ksonca7:lcom www eij--ksonci7lLcom feij--ksonca7dcom 1 2 ntonOr Preliminary Platlor the Tetherow Crossing Subdivision T o N \ 35' W.C. SWA F THE SW4 OF Section 36, TAN, RAW z � � a m PLS 10561 z W Ashtop Blakest 10 Sawtooth Middle School00 F °' ILLEGIBLE / 10'PUID EASE. 47.00'ROW 10.00'PUID R a wAshtoOpr 33.00'TRC TO TRC EASE. a o a Diet Peak St Z \ 5.00' 16.50' 16.50' 5.00' z w Asher or = 3 CL m \ 2.00' 2.00' ° z \ \\\ 1.5% 2% 2% 1.5% z a W Apple Pipe St RU o _ E � 7 CONCRETE SIDEWWALK PER vACONCRETE SIDEWWALK PER n w a wwoodpine5l c \\ ACHD STD.DWG.SD-709 3"ROLLED CURB PER 3"ROLLED CURB PER ACHD STD.DWG.SD 709 a \\ \ 21 ACHD STD DWG.SD-702 ACHD STD DWG.SD-702 z CP&F NO. I w `"aD`�nsr Z 2019-092670 \ N > n Z \ g Chevron S ,/,6� I z M m o N 33/47 Standard Local Street 1 WUStiOkRd f Z z -n rn o �, UW.USTICK RD. W Ustick Rd Q W U m m PP.1 r r Premier Kids C Preschool&Childcare one St Ste. a W Parkstone`: s UNRECOR ED ACCESS EASEMEN Legend �3P Oa NORTH LEGAL DE CRIPTION P BY � n � PRP CT SITE NORTHERL TY OWNER. , as as EXISTING SEWER AND PIPE SIZE I I I I ASEMENT OCUMENT ATTACHED, \ an opc RUT I OLELY A L GAL DESCRIPTION, aw aw EXISTING WATER AND PIPE SIZE RED B TEALEY, 06/04/12. Vicinity Map MAINTENANCE WITHIN THE TREE I U KN AS TO WHETHER AN \ , CABLE EXISTING CABLE i PRESERVATION EASEMENT SHALL � I \E 1 A ACTUALLY 1 BE PERFORMED BY LLOYD AS PER THE II IW �aR TE D DED. - - EXISTING CENTERLINE , MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT TO BE INCLUDED 2571 I �/ I IN THE TETHEROW CROSSING CC&R'S \\ _ _ro` _-'° _ EXISTING DITCH 5.0' �F5r0"- 40.05.0' 25. ' 32.8 NO CA' \ I 4PI EO EG EXISTING EDGE OF GRAVEL CONTACT DIGLINE 3 � 25j4x EP EP EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT \I X EXISTING FENCE 48-HOURS 1-STORY- li 1-STORY 1-STORY M 1-STORY - \ �0 �M 1 I ° PROJECT DETAILS I o � n2 2 ^ 1 2 , - 1 \ �/1� W WO ����'� EXISTING ZONING RUT BEFORE DIGGING ,,� F o EXISTING FIBER OPTICS ZONING: R-8 1-$00-342-1585 r 5-2 4-2 " 3-2 0 4G7o sF t o3s s / /9 1 5823 SF o 4771 SF o 4139 SF / \ I 11 n GAS-GAS- EXISTING GAS RN WEST IRR EXISTING GRAVITY IRRIGATION TOTAL ACREAGE: 7.58 AC = 330,089 SF ____ 2574 TOTAL NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDING LOTS= 46 LOTS L___ ___ ___ _ I - �T �T EXISTING JOINT TRENCH z a� �s \ TOTAL NUMBER OF COMMON LOTS = 8 LOTS U O ss.r 2ss aw j o I OHP EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER J GROSS LOT DENSITY = 6.07 LOTS AC J - o W. �`ND INE ST. �'�o -as I P 1 1 EXISTING PRESSURE IRRIGATION RESIDENTIAL LOT NET DENSITY = 10.28 LOTS/AC - 0 N N 81.8' o- aSR=300.00 FOB i v i 1 1 c.C) \ O m M o4° I� 1 \ EXISTING STORM ROW AREA = 25.85% 85,320 SF = 0 N 77.r Q� I M \ COMMON LOT AREA = 15.12% 49,894 SF •1 Fi + -- h �� u : I w1 2-6 -�- 11 r EXISTING TELEPHONE _ 4664 SF BUILDING LOT AREA = 59.04% 194,876 SF _O ° s ^ EXISTING PATHWAY Z Z ----1-3--- SEATING& 3r6 1 2571 T�Fo EXISTING TELEPHONE&FIBER Q C14a n 3867 SF - N 436� SF .1 111 ---- m PET STATION % � 0 4-6 0 � 1iIII � lo. TOE EXISTING TOE OF SLOPE MIN. LOT SIZE _ - 4 000 SF � CO - 1 / AVERAGE LOT SIZE - 4 236 SF O 420o SF U n\ 100.0• I I ; I O LLJ E 1 i 11 \ rob EXISTING TOP OF BANK 2 0 I I 1 ZPt CONNECTION TO EXISTING PATHWAY I 2-3 r a 4000 SF j N r nz°; y N: EXISTING UNDERGROUND POWER W O 1 33.00' 420, 1 r jy r,, N PROPOSED SEWER&PIPE SIZE COMMON LOTS& BUFFERS LU 1 47.00' �11 QUALIFIED QUALIFIED Q J = L-� � ul ew ew PROPOSED WATER&PIPE SIZE ~ � 1 3-3 0 INGR !; i_ 5'MICRO PATH\ - _ LAJa a 1 4000 SF N 0„- ; ACTUAL OPEN OPEN = w 1-6 12so 12so PROPOSED STORM DRAIN&PIPE SIZE w 1 841072 1 i s3as7 sF ��� sPl sPl PROPOSED PRESSURE IRRIGATION AREA SPACE SPACE 0 z o I 1 100.0' 1 1 1 USER'S DRAIN DITCH (SF) CREDIT AREA (SF) o 0- 2 CR 1 ° � o _ 1 4-3 1 0 ° ia1� -t---- -- m 12GI 12GI PROPOSED GRAVITY IRRIGATION HALF OF 25-FOOT W. USTICK RD. BUFFER (11-3G-3.B.4) 5,134 100% 5,134 a 1 4000 SF CONNECTION TO EXISTING PATHWAY � � o 1 \ 1 5'MICRO PATH ill nl PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT PLAYGROUND & OPEN SPACE LOT 1-6 (50 X 100 MIN.) (11-3G-3.B.1.A) 33,457 100/ 33,457 \ANAL E 100.0' N 1 1 \ 1 I j1 1 PRESSURE IRRIGATION o �SS NG/ OPEN SPACE BENCHES TRASH PET STATION - LOT 1-3 3,867 100/ 3,867 \STE ifi PUMP STATION EG EO PROPOSED EDGE OF GRAVEL � 5-s MICRO-PATHWAYS LOT 13-3 1,970 100% 1,970 a 5-3 1 1 - -�� ----------------- PROPOSED SAWCUT OPEN SPACE - OTHER NON QUALIFIED 3,057 0% - 3 1 a 4000 SF o III II I o 4200 SF o 4200 SF-o �� 1 PLAYGROUND& 1 25�2, 256-7 2572 ' w 100.0' SEATING AREA 1 125.51 \ PROPOSED DITCH CENTERLINE SHARED DRIVEWAYS 2,409 0% N I 1 1 �I \_- -=- 2567 �'T 10-16-20 �O 6-3 i o ',, - °I -- __ TOE PROPOSED TOP OF BANK p 9TF OF r rg 4000 SF g 257�= _ _ �� 'W C�. TOTAL OPEN SPACE 49,894 SF 44,428 SF 2.0' 40.5' G1 a S 5292 TOE PROPOSED TOE OF SLOPE /( ER\C 7 100.0' -� aw ,00.o' W 1 -S9�6336 0, a 5 N I ----------- PUID EASEMENT 1 ® 1 , o M"tip _ ti 1 QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: 44,428 S 1 a W. WIND DRIFT Cl)'�r zso 7- f`o 7-3 6 �3 i I ROv N 43s4�F 1 ----------------- PROPOSED GRADE BREAK 13.46% • . . • N • N �a y 400o SF 76 6 1 I 76.5' / \ e°��Op \\ y /' 1 -- -- PROPERTY LINE .2 co� ,• '• ' I 100.0' `1 , \ / 103.1' --- y' --------� I - --- 1 �• .. .• 1 L \� I I TOTAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: 49,894 S • I ° doo SF Al' 1 M A 1 -5 `� I 8-6 1� EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT o • • • • • ,1 15.12/0 8-3 -oo' o , ? 4148 SF I� I �j�� 4021 SF I� o �t f 4000 SF 1 a i I I I - 1 n o ,) - --_i -/s.o' 1 - 1 PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT 1 100.0' I sa.a' / f too.o' 1\\ I I o f / 1 1 o 2-5 �1 A I // 9-5 i � o I 9-6 i o � PROPOSED WATER VALVE • q d 9-3 o a I 4003 SF i!/ 1 o- l 4008 SF 1 o a 4000 SF a \ �Q00 SF 1 I I a 33.00' I 1 1 1 47.00' 1 O PROPOSED WATER METER 1� � I ss.o' NO CAP!, 160.0, I 47.00' 1 sa.s' 1 100.0' O 33.00' 1 1 1 1 1 / _ I i � L-257 o B PROPOSED BLOWOFF w 10\3-2572-\ 1 o a /'40105F i � 16 �_ 2 8-5 in 6 10-6 o F xz 6 a 4008 SF -a 4000 SF Q �4 4000 SF EMERGENCY VEHICLE TURN MOVEMENT Notes � 11' 100.0' \ I � 99.1' i , - 1 99.0' 1 1 �� I , m 100.0' a I 1 Y 20'WIDE,28'INSIDE RAD.,48'OUTSIDE RAID. o 1 M 1 1 = 0 1 17 1 Ali 7-5 10 = N o 1 11_g o 1. CURRENT ZONING: RUT' PROPOSED ZONING: R-8. o, \ 11-3 00' 4017 SF I 1 a 1 4008 SF 6 a 4000 SF 4000 SF I oil II a N e 00 1 1I 1 1 1 2. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED BY EXTENSION OF CITY OF MERIDIAN s 1 00 100.0' 1 99.3' 11 9s.o' 100.0' SEWER SYSTEM. zm 1 1 N i 11 o 1 Contacts 1 os1 0 1 1 N N 1 N R-H 3. DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE TO BE EXTENDED FROM CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SYSTEM. �� / 0 1 12-3 4 645E i 11 n I 41611 5F J 12-6 1 �� o f 4041 SF I 4620 sF I a= HAYDEN HOMES IDAHO, LLC 4. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROJECT SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE _ ---------J- I i ♦ o 5'MICRO PATH ,o4.a' ° \ o I i I -----J - \----------- N TIM MOKWA Sg ti a, CITY OF MERIDIAN ZONING AND BUILDING ORDINANCES. wZ a1.9' OWNER 1406 N. MAIN ST. STE 109 z N 13-3 % 769 83.4 5. THIS PARCEL IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN A FEMA MAPPED FLOODPLAIN. O , 1970 SF sTRASH CAN PAD aw I aw aw aw aw aw " MERIDIAN, ID 83642 C-C / 1ts.o' tss.s' o o N 6. PUBLIC UTILITY IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: w o ° ° tza35_o_o a CELL: 208.869.9785 wz 14-3 IW P(J ST 3194 SF ROW Cl) ;�, 6.1. ALL COMMON LOTS, INCLUDING SHARED DRIVEWAY COMMON LOTS, ARE HEREBY o BUILDING 47.0' 42.0'' 42.0' 3.z' 41.0' 41. ' 41.0' 34.0' 85319 SF Ni U SETBACKS + 1 3s.s' 470 ERICKSON CIVIL, INC. DESIGNATED AS HAVING A BLANKET EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES, IRRIGATION -- -� -- - �319, �6 ROSS ERICKSON P.E. AND DRAINAGE. �w -� ti J_ `o r- ENGINEER 6213 N. CLOVERDALE RD. STE 125 6.2. ALL BUILDING LOT FRONTAGES TO PUBLIC STREETS HAVE A 10-FOOT PERMANENT �N fl 1 BOISE, ID 83705 EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES, IRRIGATION, AND DRAINAGE, MEASURED FROM zW 47.00' 1 / 15-3 1 I 1 1 1 _ o a /o 'o I 16-3 '0 17-3 18_3 I T 33.00' 1 ,' OFF: 208.846.8955 THE PROPERTY LINE. z= 4r7\23 SF o 4201 SF o 42ot sF o a2z9 sF o 19-3 6 2673I o 21-3 22-3 M 1 " , �w � � ate, sF o _ o 2-4 3-4 6.3. ALL BUILDING LOT FRONTAGES TO SHARED DRIVEWAYS HAVE A 10-FOOT x� / \ ` -4.121 SFI o 14121 SF o 4829 SF I^ m 6 / 6 g 5- ----o, 4725 SF o LAND SOLUTIONS 3 \ I \ PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES, IRRIGATION, AND DRAINAGE, w �' I I I 1 --2573- --\/- CLINT HANSEN, P.L.S. MEASURED FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. l 1 1 1 PROFESSIONAL 3 PU9 T F 1 251 E. 5TH ST. STE A - - J J l _ - MERIDIAN, 8364 6.4. ALL INTERIOR SIDE LOT LINES HAVE A 5-FOOT PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC // 4PI API 4P 4P --- -pP r 1-- 4PI__ __ �� m v6 o N��---- - LAND SURVEYOR 4PI L PE 4PI 4PI OFF: 208.288.2040 � 2 47.4'- -42.0'- -42.0'-2 41.0'- 41.0•- F- �' fsUTILITIES, r AND - / --- -- -- - ------ - - 6.5. ALL REAR LOT LINES HAVE A 110-OOT PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES, f t i 41:0" -- z o a ILL 23-.7 a � _ � IRRIGATION, AND DRAINAGE. 22.5 23.5• 23 a:5` -t,9 -SY.5 -- - - _ ---- 6.6. A 10-FOOT PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES, IRRIGATION, AND Q 35 36 ,�-25,5 - o ¢ w- 1 SLL-T• NO._�Ok5=-OS1465- DRAINAGE, IS DESIGNATED ADJACENT TO THE SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY. - L6 U) - - _ Parcels Included 7. IRRIGATION WATER WILL BE PROVIDED TO EACH LOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH IDAHO CODE Z -fin n u ---------------p--`V Q m -----=---_-______ -- 2515_ _ 36 31-3805 (1)(B). THIS SUBDIVISION IS LOCATED WITHIN THE NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION 0 > 00 op w CP&F N0. ss BASIS OF BEARING J ss --- --- �_-_ 1331.09' 1/4 PARCEL # 1 SO436336156 -7.58 ACRES DISTRICT, ALL LOTS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE ASSESSMENTS OF SAID DISTRICT. z m z CO of 109109699 u - - W 1 16 TAN, R3.E. SEC. 36 2i o CO } 1035.23' / 1 8. BUILDING SETBACKS AND DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL BE - w a N N m - - - - - - -------------------------- CP&F N0. CP&F NO. IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE ZONING REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN. Q W Q v � 0 2017-120067 2017-120066 Z ° w w w w 9 9. LOTS (L-B) 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 13-3, 14-3, 23-3, 1-4 & 1-6 ARE COMMON LOTS TO BE OWNED AND a_ 0- o CREASON CREEK = MAINTAINED BY THE SUBDIVISION HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION, OR ITS ASSIGNS. N Parking Summary � JOB NUMBER: R-8 10. LOTS (L-B) LOT 14-3 IS A SHARED DRIVEWAY/COMMON LOT FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE Z GARAGE PARKING (2 PER LOT) 92 STALLS ADJOINING LOTS 15-3, 16-3 AND 17-3. MAINTENANCE OF THE SHARED DRIVEWAYS SHALL W IDB2096 N BE AS SET FORTH IN THE CC&R S PROVIDED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. LU DATE: 11-9-20 PRELIMINARY PLAT (R-8) DRIVEWAY PARKING (2 PER LOT) 92 STALLS 11. PARKING SHALL BE RESTRICTED AND NO PARKING SIGNAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED THE SHEET NUMBER: SHARED DRIVEWAY LOCATED ON COMMON LOT 14-3. ON STREET PARKING 30 STALLS w 0 60 120 12. DIRECT BUILDING LOT ACCESS TO W. USTICK RD. IS PROHIBITED. F PPOI Feet w w x I , o - - -C :;�4P q 4 LAN�5�AF CALCJLA71 CN5 � BETA I 4 PROTECT , •1 �i. EXISTING VE6ETATION & T I �\`I . LOGATI ON BUFFER WIDTH LENGTH REQUIRED PROP I DED I 2-2 . ALL LANDSCAPE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN AGGORDANGE WITH THE G I TY OF MERIDIAN ORD I NANGE REOU I REMENTS. � 5-2 I 4-2 I 11'P 2 - > ,, W wppQP\NE S�' W. USTIGK RD. 11.5' 446' / 35' = 13 TREES 20 TREES 2. ALL PLANTING AREAS TO BE WATERED WITH AN AUTOMATIC, UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. c o, COMMON AREA 41,560 / 8,000 = 6 TREES 25 TREES 3. TREES SHALL NOT BE PLANTED WITHIN THE 10-FOOT CLEAR ZONE OF ALL STORM DRAIN PIPE, STRUGTURE5, OR FAGILITIE5. IT I as SEEPAGE BEDS MUST BE PROTEGTED FROM ANY AND ALL CONTAMINATION DURING THE GONSTRUGTION AND INSTALLATION OF TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES: IC, TREES 45 TREES THE LANDSGAPE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. ALL SHRUBS PLANTED OVER OR ADJAGENT TO SEEPAGE BEDS TO HAVE A ROOT BALL THAT DOES NOT EXGEED 18" IN DIAMETER. NO LAWN SOD TO BE PLACED OVER DRAINAGE SHALE SAND WINDOWS. • GLASS I TREES PROVIDED ADJAGENT TO W. USTIGK ROAD DUE TO OVERHEAD POWER LINES. ---_--_ -_--_-_-_- >- • 4. NO TREES SHALL IMPEDE THE 40' VISION TR I ANGLES AT ALL I NTERSEGTI ON5. NO CONIFEROUS TREES OR SHRUBS OVER 3' PET S aw —awL WOOD ENE S% H16H AT MATURITY WILL BE LOGATED WITHIN VISION TRIANGLE OR ROW. AS TREES MATURE, THE OWNER SHALL BE W• a5 \ / ' RESPONSIBLE FOR PRUNING TREE GANOPIE5 TO MEET REQUIREMENTS FOR MAINTAINING CLEAR VISIBILITY WITHIN 40' STREET — T — �Y I I •.,• ATI N6 A as • - r;�EVEL.Cf=�oTNT AND DEPARTURE VISION TRIANGLE. TREES SHALL BE PLANTED NO CLOSER THAN 50' FROM INTERSEGTIONSTOP SIGNS. ATA 2-6 EXISTING TREES TO 5. GLASS II TREES AND LANDSGAPE IN FRONT OF BUILDING LOTS ON INTERIOR STREETS TO BE COMPLETED DURING TOTAL AREA 7.58 ACRES GONSTRUGTION ON THESE LOTS. TREE LOGATIONS MAY BE ALTERED TO AGGOMMODATE DRIVEWAYS AND UTILITIES. TREES SOD - REMAIN AS POSSIBLE ®t 3-6 ADJAGENT TO D I TGH RESIDENTIAL LOTS 46 MUST BE GLASS I AND SHALL NOT BE PLANTED WITHIN 5' OF WATER METERS OR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES. ...................................................................... 4-6 •- x TILE. AREA TO BE COMMON LOTS 8 UNDER-SEEDED W/ 6. PLANT LIST IS REPRESENTATIVE AND SUBJECT TO ADDITIONS AND/OR SUBSTITUTIONS OF SIMILAR SPECIES THAT ARE ---- I 6 VINYL LATTICE TO ` • ;, FENGE ADJA ENT TO ,- GRASS FOR MINIMAL TOTAL LOTS ...................................................................................... 54 SUBJECT TO CITY FORESTER'S PRE-APPROVAL. PLANTING BED DESIGN AND G2UANTITIE5 MAY BE ALTERED DURING FINAL GOMMN A S ( (P� DISTURBANCE (TYP) PLAT LANDSGAPE PLAN DESIGN. BURLAP AND WIRE BASKETS TO BE REMOVED FROM ROOT BALL AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, AT 2-3 I / LEAST HALFWAY DOWN THE BALL OF THE TREE. ALL NYLON ROPES TO BE COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM TREES. G2UAL I F I ED OPEN SPACE 44,428 SF (I 3.4(9%) . �• ALL EXISTING TREES ON SITE TO BE RETAINED AND PROTECT WHERE POSSIBLE. VERIFY ALL MITIGATION REQUIREMENT5 FOR ii CONNECTION EXISTING ZONING ........................................................................... RUT N I i� .` TREES TO BE REMOVED WITH MERIDIAN GITY FORESTER PRIOR TO REMOVAL. • PATHWAY TO PROPOSED ZONING R-8....................................................................... 3-3 I I AWN NEIGHBORING (Typ) PATHWAY SYSTEM PLAYGROUND 4 3- (TYF) — z SEATING AREA - + ® I I -r \• I i 4-3 DEGIDU U •�•`• - - - - - + i i � SHAD E TI ' (TYP) I ` • 15-6 I 5-3 I `� � I I' i u ORNAMENTAL TREE (T T P) PLANT PALETTE I — — i of on 6-3 I \CLUSTER — _ Wi �_ j •!W '. SYM COMMON NAME BOTANIGAL NAME SIZE SYM DESCRIPTION I I� _ _ `•r zu�- _ MAILBOX_ PAS ®® awe 8w EVERGREEN TREES WIND IFT St. ���v� AUSTRIAN PINE PINUS NI&RA 6-8' HT BBB 7-3 I I ' I zo V 7-6 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE PIGEA 6LAUGA 'DENSATA' 6-8' HT BBB SOD FAT ALBERT BLUE SPRUCE PIGEA PUN&EN5 'FAT ALBERT' 6-8' HT BBB LAWN MOON&LOW JUNIPER JUNIPERUS SGOPLULORUM 'MOO&LOH' 6-8' HT BBB NORWAY SPRUCE PIGEA ABIES 6-8' HT B�B - I Wil _5 \ 8_6 VANDERWOLFS PINE PINUS FLEXILIS VANDERWOLFS' 6-8' HT BBB 6 SOLID VINYL FENGE 8-3 I I ALONG PERIMETER - SHADE TREES (GLASS III) PROPERTY LINES (TYP). BLOOD600D LONDON PLANETREE PLATANUS x AGERIFOLIA 'BLOOD600D' 2" GAL Bi B 2-5 II 9-5 I 9-6 NORTHERN RED OAK G2UERGU5 RUBRA 2" GAL Bi B 9-3 I I ! 11 I �' 6 VINYL LATTICE TOP I I I I wl X FENGE ADJAGENT TO SOLID VINYL SHADE/STREET TREES (GLASS II) COMMON AREAS (TYP). co PERIMETER I SKYLINE HONEYLOGUST 6LEDITSIA TRIAGANTHOS INERMIS SKYGOLE' 2" GAL BBB3-5 NI 10-6 FENCE (TYP)- LITTLELEAF LINDEN TILIA GORDATA 2" GAL B$B z I z I PAG I F I G SUNSET MAPLE AGER TRUNGATUM x A. PLATANO I DES 'HARRENRED' 2" GAL B$B EXISTING FENG I N6 � - - I - TULIP TREE LIRODENDRON TULIPIFERA 2" GAL BBB (T11rP) I wl I I ;I � I 1 1-3 4-5 I I I I C I 7-5 I 1 1-6 ORNAMENTAL TREES (GLASS U I I II — wi I GHANTIGLEER PEAR PRRUS GALLERYANA 'GLEN'S FORM' 2" GAL BBB J I I _ _ _ _ GANADA RED GHOKEGHERRY PRUNUS V I R61 N I ANA 'GANADA RED' 6-8' HT. MULTI-STEM - - - - T - - - - VISION TRIANGLE GRUZAN GRUSADER HAWTHORN GRATAE6US GRU5-6ALL1 'GRUZAM' 2" GAL B�B I , 01 CONNECTION o o w (TYP) NOTHINGS MAPLE AGER TATARIGUM '6ARANN' 6-8' HT. MULTI-STEM PATHWAY 12-3 5-5 II 6-5 12-6 - ROYAL RAINDROPS CRABAPPLE MALUS x 'JFS-KH5' 2" GAL BBB (TYP) II SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE MALUS 'SPRIN65NOW' 2" GAL BBB / X * \ � - - - - I" - - - - SHRUBS/ORNAMENTAL 6RA55ES/PERENNIALS Ai 8w gw + 8W x \ i i -8W8W- ��� I aw �w ARIZONA SUN 6AILLARDIA 6AILLARDIA x 'ARIZONA SUN' I GAL - W. PUDU �T. BLACK EYED SUSAN RUDBEGKIA FULGIDA 'GOLDSTRUM' I GAL OWNER / �� 8w aw- i�_ j/ BLUE 6RAMMA GRASS BOUTELOUA 6RAGILIS 'BLONDE AMBITION' 16AL III /// BLUE MIST SPIREA GARYOPTERIS x GLANDONENSIS 'BLUE MIST' 2 GAL HAYDEN HOMES IDAHO, LLC _ r _ / BLUE OAT GRASS HELIGTOTRIGHON SEMPERVIRENS I GAL TIM \ / / M A BLUE RUG JUNIPER JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS 'HILTONI' 3 6AL 1406 N MAINSKWSTE 109 II \ PURPLE GONEFLOWER EGHINAGEA PURPUREA I GAL III I I I I I I / RED FLOWER GARPET ROSE ROSA 'FLOWER CARPET- NOARE' 2 GAL MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 DARTS GOLD N I NEBARK PHYSOGARPUS OPUL I FOL I US 'DART'S GOLD' S GAL 15-3 I 16-3 17-3 18-3 19-3 12 21-3 22-3 I STELLA DE ORO DAYLILLY HEMEROGALLIS 'STELLA D'ORO' 16AL 2-4 3-4 % FINE LINE BUCKTHORN RHAMNUS FRA6ULA 'RON WILLIAM5' 5 GAL L I� GRO-LOW 5UMAG RHU5 AROMATIGA '6RO-LOW' 5 GAL ENGINEER III I I I III EVERGREEN I SHRUB I BED . I IA 'SG,4PE i MONUMENTi / HUSKER RED PENSTEMON PENSTEMON DIGITALIS 'HUSKER RED' I GAL ERICKSON CIVIL, INC. _ - TREE (TYP) (TYP) I OR (TYP) SIGN 0 IVORY HALO DOGWOOD GORNUS ALBA 'BAILHALO' 5 GAL ROSS ERICKSON, P.E. - / KARL FORESTER REED 6RA55 GALAMA6RO5T15 ARUNDINAGEA K.F. I GAL 4P1 — 4P' 4PI— —4PI —4PI- 4PI 4PI 4PI `" j/ MAIDEN 6RA55 MISGANTHU5 5INEN515 '6RAGILLIMU5' I GAL 6213 N CLOVERDALE RD, STE 125 BRAKELIGHTS RED YUGGA HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA 'PERPA' 16AL BOISE, IDAHO 83705 4PI 4PI / - - - -` - SUMMERW I NE N I NEBARK PHYSOGARPUS OPUL I FOL I A SEWARD 5 OAL o- o -- - W. USTICK RD. -, 0 -------------- ----- ------------------- - ---- ------ BASIS OF BEARING ------------------------------------------------------------- -------- / N L-IL OF MENU �cr C• f ■■■■■i do ■■■■■�_ JEN1SEN'BELTS NOVEMBER 9, 2020 j� ASSOCIATES s]'5 0' 50' 100' 150' Site Planning/Landscape Architecture MERIDIAN I DAHO PRELI M I NARY PLAT LANDSCAPE PLAN '� r�►11111�1���''''� Dscr 15M Tyrol Lane,Ste 180 Boise,0 88700 Ph 120e1 343-7176 www.jensenbeRscom NORTH SCALE I" = 50' Issue Description Date ISSUE 11-q-20 FLAN7 FALE77E OF (REFERENGE SHT L3) �� � C. MATCHLINE L2 srM COMMON NAME EVER6REEN TREES r AUSTRIAN PINE � � �z / 1 -5 MATCH LINE L1 10-5 BLAGK HILLS SPRUCE . 6535 8-3 I o I 8—6 FAT ALBERT BLUE SPRUCE o 1 MOONSLOW JUNIPER NORWAY SPRUCE tLL VANDERWOLFS PINE — — — —"I SHADE TREES (GLASS III) ; o I ; I CD 9-3 I I 2—5 I 9-5 I 9-6 NORTHERN RED OAK 6000 N PLANETREE U) M — — N SHADE/STREET TREES (GLASS II) o = — SKYLINE HONEYLOGUST N = LITTLELEAF LINDEN 00 I — N 0 PACIFIC SUNSET MAPLE JENSENBELTS 10- I I 3 5 �I II 8-5 I I 10-6 TULIP TREE ASSOCIATES z I I 6' SOLID VINYL z PERIMETER Lc� ORNAMENTAL TREES (GLASS 1) Site Planning x — — — — � FENCE (TYP) GHANTIGLEER PEAR — — — — � — — — — � Landscape Architecture C ANADA RED GHOKEGHERR i' U� GRUZAN GRUSADER HAWTHORN 1509 Tyrell Lane, Ste 130 N HOTNIN65 MAPLE Boise, Idaho 83706 4-5 II 7-5 I 1 1 -6 ROYAL RAINDROPS CRABAPPLE Ph. (208) 343-7175 x 1 1 -3 I I I I SPRI N6 SNOW GRABAPPLE ! I www.jensenbelts.com w SHRUBS/ORNAMENTAL 6RA55E5/PERENNIAL5 M00 M — — ARIZONA SUN 6AILLARDIA CD VISION 00 BLACK EYED SUSAN 00 / BLUE 6RAMMA GRASS o — o �! w1 TRIANGLE N BLUE MIST SPIREA 12-3 5 5 I 6-5 (TYP) 12-6 CD /i/ BBLUE LUE OAT 6R JUNPER X CONNECTION I / \ O / PURPLE GONEFLOWER PATHWAY (TYP) o / � U-) RED FLOWER CARPET ROSE M - - o l DARTS GOLD NINEBARK B + w / FINE L LINE DEBUCKTHORN ORO DAYL I LLY WE� k =+ TRA5H CA 8 W 18 W 8 W 8 W_ 8 6RO-LOW SUMAC, I W 8W 8W / HUSKER RED PENSTEMON z IVORY HALO DOGWOOD / KARL FOERSTER REED SRASS Z _ 6'�NYL LATTIGE�TOP FEN ° W W. P U�U �T. S � 8 / 8W A'D-.AGENT",TC�- /j MAIDEN GRASS Q A AS (TYP) BRAKELISHT5 RED YUGGA z J - - - I SUMMERWINE NINEBARK a + W -TOP -- -- \ 0 / SOD Q - / LAWN O 0 Cn I I I I I I I O /401 6 SOLID VINYL FENGE Q 15 3 1 6 3 17-3 18-3 ALONG PERIMETER 19-3 ;2 1 21 -3 2 2-3 I PROPERTY LINES (TYP). Q V - 2-4 3-4 SEE DTL 4, SHT L3. .. J IN I > Z I I - SHRUB BED I I I 6' SOLID VINYII'' I 6' VINYL LATTICE TOP FENGE 3: Q Q (NP) PERIMETER T I LANDSC,�APE z X— �< ADJACENT TO COMMON AREAS. FENGE (TYP) BUFFER (TYP) I ORNAMENT J (TYP). SEE DTL 5, SHT L3. O a I I I TREE (TYP c� 4P1 o W 4P1 PI aF;- - 4 4P1 4P1 4 DApI 4P1 I - 4P1 EXISTINS FENCING - - - _ - - - - ( ) / � �/ 18 I TYP SOD LAWN (TYP) O o - ° o� - ---------------------- cc CD W _ _ _ _ _ _ _ W. U S TI C K R D. MONUMENT NOTE5 W SIGN W W W W W W W I. REFER TO SHEET L3 FOR PLANT PALETTE, _ W W DEVELOPMENT DATA, LANDSGAPE GALGULATIONS, W w " LANDSCAPE DETAILS, AND FENGINS DETAILS. Job Number 2077 KEY MAP Drawn Checked --------------- -------------_ KCS K C S Scale AS SHOWN Sheet Title o LANDSCAPE NORTH ------I ---------- ----- 0' 30' 60' 90' PLAN SCALE 1 = 30 OWNER ENGINEER - I'� ! Sheet Number HAYDEN HOMES IDAHO, LLC ERICKSON CIVIL, INC. T T TIM MAKWA ROSS ERICKSON, P.E. 1406 N MAIN ST., STE 109 6213 N CLOVERDALE RD, STE 125 1__ 1 Ll MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 BOISE, IDAHO 83705 2 of 4 Sheets Issue Description Date ISSUE 11-q-20 I I I I I / I I I I o I TOE TOE TOE F.C. PLANT PALETTE 0 F °P �! (REFERENGE SHT 1-3) C. - - 77 4 W SYM COMMON NAME 4P1 4P1 W RETAIN PROTECT o \ W W W i EVERGREEN TREES EXISTING GETATION \ W1 z W AUSTRIAN PINE — — — I (NP) \ W W W W / BLAGK HILLS SPRUCE 6535 FAT ALBERT BLUE SPRUCE f�i� �ti MOON6LOW JUNIPER � C. NORWAY SPRUCE 2-2 �, � QQDp\NE VANDERWOLFS PINE 5—2 4-2 3 2 — \ 7� SHADE TREES (CLASS 1 11) • / I \ / js 55 \ a 55 BLOOD6000 LONDON PLANETREE � I • NORTHERN RED OAK U SHADE/STREET TREES (GLASS II) I o SKYLINE HONEYLOGUST M SN 8 LITTLELEAF LINDEN PAGIFIG SUNSET MAPLE JENSENBELTS M Y TULIP TREE ASSOCIATES W � I — — — — — — — — 8W 8W p INE SS w ORNAMENTAL TREES (GLASS 1) �f QQ Site Planning W PET ASTE � _ w ' BS W \W GHANTIGLEER PEAR Landscape Architecture STATION, SEE GANADA RED GHOKEGHERRI' o 8S DTL 6, SHT L3 � I I I W GRUZAN CRUSADER HAWTHORN 1509 Tyrell Lane, Ste 130 W HOTWIN65 MAPLE Boise, Idaho 83706 EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN ROYAL RAINDROPS GRABAPPLE Ph. 208 343-7175 — — — — — o I "" AS POSSIBLE ADJACENT TO W W DITCH TILE. AREA TO BE SPRING SNOW GRABAPPLE 4P1 _ / VISION wl 2-6 UNDER-SEEDED W/ GRASS www.jensenbelts.com o TRIANG CG LE W o FOR MINIMAL DISTURBANCE SHRUBS/ORNAMENTAL RASSES/PERENN I ALS SOD W ARIZONA SUN 6AILLARDIA BLACK EYED SUSAN (TYP) / 1 / BLUE 6RAMMA GRASS 4-6 \ y BLUE MIST SPIREA o BLUE OAT GRASS BLUE RUG JUNIPER • 6' VINYL ATT16E TO FENCE W W y PURPLE GONEFLOWER RED FLOWER GARPET ROSE SHRUB BED AD AGE T PTOOMM N DARTS GOLD NINEBARK (TYP) 2—3 I co ARE S ( ) wl ZP y/ W / yy// W y STELLA DE ORO DAYLILLY a_ 2p� / W x / FINE LINE BUCKTHORN W 6RO-LOW SUMAC, oo HUSKER RED PENSTEMON w IVORY HALO DOGWOOD KARL FOERSTER REED GRASS 0 Z • o W // MAIDEN GRASS Q 3-3 I SOD W CONNECTION / BRAKEL I6HT5 RED YUGGA z J � LAWN W W o x PATHWAYS TO SUMMERWINE NINEBARK /� a. {J (TYP) NEIGHBORING W ' wl • W PATHWAY SYSTEM (1)(TYP) a PLAYGROUND 4 D SOD Z Q SEATING AREA + ° I I - P W W LAWN 0 0 cf) 4-3 I o I I / W �'�'W W ORNAMENTAL i EVERGREE W W W 6' SOLID VINYL FENCE Q Z I Z TREE (TYP) � I ( ) / ALONG PERIMETER � Q M + i i w TREE TYP I W W W W PROPERTY LINES (TYP). V — Q SEE DTL 4, SHT L3.CD 14 Z J ° • I � � `j' 6 W W W � H 5 I I + I y 6 /W W 6 VINYL LATTICE TOP FENCE —3 Q Q X X X X ADJACENT TO COMMON AREAS. Q Q J -4- I I DEGIDUOU y W X (TYP). SEE DTL 5, SHT L3. — a SOD I I SHADE TFJEE - LAWN I (I I P) I W W N CLUSTER (TYP) I I I W W W W EXISTING FENCING D I \ \ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W (T/P)MAILBOX PAD (D 6-3 I W W W W X W W W W W W W W W W o o W W I � J M 8W 8W NOTE51L_I_ 1— — — — — WIND 8 w W J — P cc co ° ID 2 2 S D 7-6 1. REFER TO SHEET L3 FOR PLANT PALETTE, 7_3 I o � DEVELOPMENT DATA, LANDSCAPE GALGULATIONS, LANDSCAPE DETAILS, AND FENGIN6 DETAILS. MATCHLINE L2 MATCHLINE L1 Job Number 2077 KEY MAP Drawn Checked --------------- ------------ KCS K C S Scale AS SHOWN - j Sheet Title o NORTH LANDSCAPE -----� ---------- ----- 0' 30' 60' 90' - ___ ==_ _=_ - PLAN SCALE 1" = 30' I OWNER ENGINEER I'� ! Sheet Number HAYDEN HOMES IDAHO, LLC ERICKSON CIVIL, INC. T T TIM MAKWA ROSS ERICKSON, P.E. °a ° y v _ 1406 N MAIN ST., STE 109 6213 N CLOVERDALE RD, STE 125 1__ 1 L 2 -- MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 BOISE, IDAHO 83705 3 of 4 Sheets Issue Description Date ISSUE 11-q-20 POST GAP FI.ANT PAL TT6' O.G. Iy2" x s Y2° RAIL '/8" x 6" VINYL SYM COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE PICKET PANELS EVERGREEN TREES AUSTRIAN PINE PINUS NISRA 6-5' HT B4B BLAGK HILLS SPRUGE PIGEA SLAUGA 'DENSATA' 6-5' HT BaB FAT ALBERT BLUE SPRUGE PIGEA PUNSENS 'FAT ALBERT' 6-8' HT B�B ,rrr � �F j �fjr 8' x 2" x 2" CEDAR STAKE, 2 PER TREE. MOONGLOH JUNIPER I PER JUNIPERUS SGOPLULORUM 'M006LOH' 6-8' HT B�B � � C. E SET STAKES PARALLEL TO PREVAILING NORWAY SPRUGE PIGEA ABIES 6-8' HT BaB WIND. 5EGURE WITH RUBBER GINGH TIE5. VANDERHOLFS PINE PINUS FLEXIL15 'VANDERHOLFS' 6-8' HT BaB S DO NOT PENETRATE ROOTBALL. SEE NOTE 3. `9 SHADE TREES (GLASS I11) ftb X 5" x 5" SQ POST i� 635 �ti ROOT GROWN TO BE I-2 � BLOODSOOD LONDON PLANETREE PLATANUS x AGERIFOLIA BLOODSOOD 2 GAL BBB �� � 4" OK FLARE MUST TRUNK BE VISIBLE NORTHERN RED OAK QUERGUS RUBRA 2" GAL BaB ��#1 �11 �rtiti� IN PLANTING BEDS: SHADE/STREET TREES (GLASS II) 5-0" MIN MULCH AS SPECIFIED. SKYLINE HONEYLOGUST GLED I TS 1 A TRI AGANTHOS I NERM I S 'SKYGOLE' 2" GAL B4B BRUSH AWAY FROM TRUNK. LITTLELEAF LINDEN TILIA GORDATA 2" GAL B4B FERTILIZER TABS AS SPECIFIED FOOTING PER MF6 0 PAGIFIG SUNSET MAPLE AGER TRUNGATUM x A. PLATANOIDES 'HARRENRED' 2" GAL B4B RECOMMENDATIONS TULIP TREE L I RODENDRON TUL I P I FERA 2" GAL B4B SNIP BASKET ff 2'-0" MttW _ TURN BACK BURLAP 1/3. NOTES: ORNAMENTAL TREES (GLASS 1) BAGKFILL W/ TOPSOIL MIX I. FENCE TO STEP DOWN TO 3' HEIGHT 20' FROM ROW. GHANTIGLEER PEAR PYRUS GALLERYANA 'GLEN'S FORM' 2" GAL B$B -III-III-III-III AS SPEC D � TAMP LOOSELY ,III- 2. VINYL FENGE STYLE MAY VARY SLIGHTLY. GANADA RED GHOKEGHERRY PRUNUS V I R61 N I ANA 'GANADA RED' 6-8' HT. MULTI-STEM ,III-III=� IN 4"-6" LIFTS 3. SAND GOLOR GRUZAN GRUSADER HAWTHORN GRATAE6U5 GRU5-6ALL1 'GRUZAM' 2" GAL B$B JENSENBELTS 2 x BALL DIA. HOTHINSS MAPLE AGER TATARIGUM '6ARANN' 6-8' HT. MULTI-STEM ROYAL RAINDROPS GRABAPPLE MALUS x 'JFS-KH5' 2" GAL B$B ASSOCIATES NOTES: �' VINYL PRI VAG'T' FENGE SPRING SNOW GRABAPPLE MALUS 'SPRIN65NOH' 2" GAL B$B I. REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE, OR BINDINGS FROM ALL TRUNKS. NOT TO 50ALE SHRUBS/ORNAMENTAL 6RASSES/PERENNIALS Site Planning 2. REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE BASKETS FROM THE TOP 1/5 OF ALL ROOT BALLS AFTER Landscape Architecture PLANTI N6. IF SYNTHETIC WRAP/BURLAP IS USED, IT MUST BE COMPLETELY REMOVED. ARI ZONA SUN GA I LLARD I A 6A I LLARD I A x 'ARI ZONA SUN' I GAL POST BLAGK EYED SUSAN RUDBEGKIA FULSIDA 'SOLDSTRUM' I GAL Ste 130 3. STAKING OF TREES TO BE THE GONTRAGTOR'S OPTION; HOWEVER THE CONTRACTOR IS 1509 Tyrell Lane, W/ GAP 71 Y2" O.G. / BLUE GRAMMA GRASS BOUTELOUA 6RAGILIS 'BLONDE AMBITION' I GAL Idaho 83706 RESPONSIBLE TO INSURE THAT ALL TREES ARE PLANTED STRAIGHT AND REMAIN TOP RAIL // BLUE MIST SPIREA GARYOPTERIS x GLANDONENSIS 'BLUE MIST' 2 GAL Boise, STRAIGHT FOR A MIN OF I YEAR. ALL STAKING SHALL BE REMOVED AT THE END OF THE I YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD. BLUE OAT GRASS HELIGTOTRIGHON SEMPERVIRENS I GAL Ph. (208) 343-7175 / BLUE RUG JUNIPER JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS 'WILTONI' 3 GAL www.jensenbelts.com 4. TREES PLANTED IN TURF AREAS: REMOVE TURF 3' DIA. FROM TREE TRUNK. OPEN LATTICE TOP PURPLE CONEFL R JUNIPEEGHIN US PURPUREA I GAL cV PERM OPEN VISION) / RED FLOWER CARPET ROSE ROSA 'FLOWER CARPET- NOARE' 2 GAL PER MERIDIAN CITY RED UDC, I I-3A-7A. DARTS GOLD NINEBARK PHYSOGARPUS OPULIFOLIUS VART'S GOLD' 5 GAL TREE i�LANTI NCB/STAK I NCB / STELLA DE ORO DAYLILLY HEMEROGALLIS STELLA D ORO I GAL / FINE LINE BUCKTHORN RHAMNUS FRASULA 'RON H I LL I AMS' 5 6AL NOT TO 5GALE BOTTOM 4 6RO-LOW SUMAC, RHUS AROMATIGA '6RO-LOW' 5 6AL CENTER RAIL / HUSKER RED PENSTEMON PENSTEMON D 161 TAL 1 S 'HUSKER RED' I GAL IVORY HALO DOGWOOD GORNUS ALBA 'BAILHALO' 5 GAL / KARL FOER5TER REED GRASS GALAMAGROSTIS ARUNDINAGEA 'K.F.' I GAL PANELS j j MAIDEN GRASS M 1 SGANTHUS S I NEN51 S 'DRAG I LL I MUS' I GAL BRAKEL I6HTS RED YUGGA HESPERALOE PARV I FLORA 'PERPA' I GAL SUMMERW I NE NINEBARK PHYSOGARPUS OPUL I FOL I A 'SEHARD' 5 GAL X SOD 6 VINYL LATTICE TOP FENGE Z IN PLANTING BEDS: Lp`HN X X _x (T1'P)ADJGEN SEETD� SOTHIo SHTREAS. Q MULCH AS SPECIFIED. FOOTI N6 PER MF6 z J BRUSH AWAY FROM STEM. RECOMMENDATIONS a NOTES: 6 SOLID VINYL FENGE I. FENGE TO STEP DOWN TO 3' HEIGHT 20' FROM ROW. ALONG PERIMETER EXISTING FENGIN6 W 2. VINYL LATTICE FENGE STYLE MAY VARY SLIGHTLY. PROPERTY LINES (TYP). (TYP) Q_ TURN BACK BURLAP, TOP 1/3 OF BALL. 3. SAND GOLOR. SEE DTL 4, THIS SHT. =III KEEP GROUND LINE SAME AS NURSERY. (� =III O 0 O co VINYL LATTIGE TOP FENGE - _ FERTILIZER TABS AS SPECIFIED � '� a Q I V� PLANTI N6 SOIL AS PER SPEGS. NOT TO SCALE _ _ I• ALL LANDSGAPE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN AGGORDANGE WITH THE G I TY OF MERIDIAN ORD I NANGE REQUIREMENTS. J 2. ALL PLANTING AREAS TO BE WATERED WITH AN AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. Z NOTE: DIG HOLE TW I GE THE SIZE OF ROOTBALL. � PET WASTE STATION TO BE DOSIPOT 0-800-364-7681) 3. TREES SHALL NOT BE PLANTED WITHIN THE 10-FOOT GLEAR ZONE OF ALL STORM DRAIN PIPE, STRUCTURES, OR FACILITIES. Q l ALUMINUM DOSIPOT PET STATION MODEL #1003-L OR SEEPAGE BEDS MUST BE PROTEGTED FROM ANY AND ALL CONTAMINATION DURING THE GONSTRUGTION AND INSTALLATION OF J APPROVED EQUAL. THE LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. ALL SHRUBS PLANTED OVER OR ADJAGENT TO SEEPAGE BEDS TO HAVE A ROOT BALL O a 2 SNRUE3 PLANTIN6 FINISH ON TRASH RECEPTACLE TO BE BLAGK THAT DOES NOT EXGEED 15" IN DIAMETER. NO LAWN SOD TO BE PLACED OVER DRAINAGE SHALE SAND WINDOWS. Uj NOT TO 5GALE (#12O&BLK-L) 4. NO TREES SHALL IMPEDE THE 40' VISION TRIANGLES AT ALL INTERSECTIONS. NO CONIFEROUS TREES OR SHRUBS OVER 3' QUANTITY: ONE (1) HIGH AT MATURITY WILL BE LOCATED WITHIN VISION TRIANGLE OR ROW. AS TREES MATURE, THE OWNER SHALL BE W Q RESPONSIBLE FOR PRUNING TREE GANOPIES TO MEET REQUIREMENTS FOR MAINTAINING GLEAR VISIBILITY WITHIN 40' STREET Z LOCATIONS: IN DOG PARK AREA - AS SHOWN ON PLAN AND DEPARTURE VISION TRIANGLE. TREES SHALL BE PLANTED NO GL05ER THAN 50' FROM INTERSECTION STOP SIGNS. 5. GLASS 11 TREES AND LANDSCAPE IN FRONT OF BUILDING LOTS ON INTERIOR STREETS TO BE GOMPLETED DURING J GONSTRUGTION ON THESE LOTS. TREE LOCATIONS MAY BE ALTERED TO AGGOMMODATE DRIVEWAYS AND UTILITIES. TREES MUST BE GLASS 11 AND SHALL NOT BE PLANTED WITHIN 5 OF WATER METERS OR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES. w W w COLOR NOT REPRESENTATIVE 6. PLANT LIST 15 REPRESENTATIVE AND SUBJEGT TO ADDITIONS AND/OR SUBSTITUTIONS OF SIMILAR SPEGIES THAT ARE a SUBJEGT TO GITY FORESTER'S PRE-APPROVAL. PLANTING BED DESIGN AND QUANTITIES MAY BE ALTERED DURING FINAL FINISH TO BE PLAT LANDSGAPE PLAN DESIGN. BURLAP AND WIRE BASKETS TO BE REMOVED FROM ROOT BALL AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, AT TURF all POWDERGOATED LEAST HALFWAY DOWN THE BALL OF THE TREE. ALL NYLON ROPES TO BE GOMPLETELY REMOVED FROM TREES. MULCH BLAGK PER SPEC 7. ALL EXISTING TREES ON SITE TO BE RETAINED AND PROTEGT WHERE POSSIBLE. VERIFY ALL MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS FOR n Vl n TREES TO BE REMOVED WITH MERIDIAN CITY FORESTER PRIOR TO REMOVAL. 4 1=, 1111 III-I 1170 I III-^ _ - � -____ - _ _ - o1=III=III III-ICI-III III III ICI- PET FI ST STATION LANr;�5CAFE Job Number 2077 1—III-III-III III-III-III=1 III- CoALCJLAT10N5 11 1 I 1 Ell Ell NOT TO 56ALE III-III-FINISH GUT EDGE TOP SOIL LOCATION BUFFER WIDTH LENGTH REQUIRED PROVIDED Drawn Checked GRADE KCS KCS r��EVELCFI"`vIENT �ATA H. USTIGK RD. 11.5' 446 / 35' = 13 TREES 20 TREES Scale AS SHOWN Sheet Title TOTAL AREA ................................................................................... 7.5E ACRES PLANTER GUT BED ED6 COMMON AREA 41,560 / 8,000 = 6 TREES 23 TREES RESIDENTIAL LOTS ...................................................................... 46 LANDSCAPE NOT TO SCALE GOMMON LOTS 8 TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES: Ici TREES 43 TREES TOTAL LOTS ...................................................................................... 54 GLASS I TREES PROVIDED ADJAGENT TO H. USTIGK ROAD DUE TO OVERHEAD POWER LINES. PLAN QUALIFIED OPEN SPAGE .............................................................. 44,42E SF (13.46%) EXISTING ZONING ........................................................................... RUT OWNER ENGINEER Sheet Number PROPOSEDZONING ....................................................................... R-8 HAYDEN HOMES IDAHO, LLC ERICKSON CIVIL, INC. TIM MAKWA ROSS ERICKSON, P.E. 1406 N MAIN ST., STE 109 6213 N CLOVERDALE RD, STE 125 L3 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 BOISE, IDAHO 83705 4 of 4 Sheets RETAI a PRO GT �r '1•'a, IJ-1 ,ILN— ALCN C 7E a EXISTI NCB VEGETATION LOCATION BUFFER V4 DTH LENGTH REQU I RED PROVIDED ALL LANDSCAPE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN AGGORDANGE WITH THE GI TY OF MERIDIAN ORD I NANGE REQUIREMENTS. 5-2 4-2 3-2 2-2 p WQQ4P1N� S� W. USTIGK RD. 11.5' 446' 1 55' = 15 TREES 20 TREES 2• ALL PLANTING AREAS TO BE WATERED WITH AN AUTOMATIG UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 1 t 1 COMMON AREA 41,560 1 8,000 = 6 TREES 25 TREES 3. TREES SHALL NOT BE PLANTED WITHIN THE 10-FOOT CLEAR ZONE OF ALL STORM DRAIN PIPE, 5TRU6TURE5, OR FAG I L I TI ES. SEEPAGE BEDS MUST BE PROTEGTED FROM ANY AND ALL GONTAMINATION DURING THE GONSTRUGTION AND INSTALLATION OF TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES: Iq TREES 43 TREES THE LANDSGAPE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. ALL SHRUBS PLANTED OVER OR ADJACENT TO SEEPAGE BEDS TO HAVE A ROOT BALL - - THAT DOES NOT EXGEED 18" IN DIAMETER. NO LAWN SOD TO BE PLAGED OVER DRAINAGE SCALE SAND WINDOWS. GLASS I TREES PROVIDED ADJACENT TO W. USTi GK ROAD DUE TO OVERHEAD POWER LINES. --_----_------- ` 4. NO TREES SHALL IMPEDE THE 40' VISION TRIANGLES AT ALL INTERSEGTIONS. NO CONIFEROUS TREES OR SHRUBS OVER 3' ----- - pET WA5TE W W���P�t�� S� J H 16H AT MATURITY WILL BE LOGATED WITHIN VISION TRIANGLE OR ROW. AS TREES MATURE, THE OWNER SHALL BE Tom- -- - _ RESPONSIBLE FOR PRUNING TREE CANOPIES TO MEET REQUIREMENT5 FOR MAINTAINING CLEAR VISIBILITY WITHIN 40' STREET TINE AREA -.' :;l:VEL0F��EN7 AND DEPARTURE VISION TRIANGLE. TREES SHALL BE PLANTED NO GLO5ER THAN 50' FROM INTERSEGTION STOPSlGNS. 7A 2-5 5 ., . ,. ...-:•.• .,. .• EXISTING TREES Tp TOTAL AREA ............................................ 7.58 ACRES REMAIN AS P0551BLE GONSTRUGT ON ON THESE LOTS. TREE LOCATIONS MAY BE ALTERED TO AGGOMMODATE DRIVEWAYS AND UTILITIES. TREES i i ts: 3-s ADJACENT TO DITCH RESIDENTIAL LOTS 46 MUST BE GLASS !I AND SHALL NOT BE PLANTED 1^4lTH1N 5' pF W�4TER METERS OR VNDERC�ROUND UTILITY LINES. 1 i TILE. AREA TO BE COMMON LOTS ................................................................. 8 6. PLANT LIST IS REPRE5ENTATIVE AND 5UBJEGT TO ADDITIONS ANDIOR SUBSTITUTIONS OF 51MILAR 5PEGIE5 THAT ARE - 6' VINYL LATiT1GE TO I -d. UNDER-SEEDED WI TOTAL LOTS ............................................................... 54 SUBJEGT TO GITY FORESTERS PRE-APPROVAL. PLANTING BED DESIGN AND [QUANTITIES MAY BE ALTERED DURING FINAL FENCE ADJA ENT TO GRA55 FOR MINIMAL Gp'MMON A 5 (TYP) DISTURBANCE (TYP) PLAT LANDSGAPE PLAN DESIGN. BURLAP AND WIRE BASKETS TO BE REMOVED FROM ROOT BALL AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, AT 2-3 1 r LEAST HALFWAY DOWN THE BALL OF THE TREE. ALL NYLON ROPES TO BE GOMPLETELY REMOVED FROM TREES. 1 1 DUAL I F IED OPEN SPAGE ..........-- 44,428 5F (15.4696) ALL EXISTING TREES ON 51TE TO BE RETAINED AND PROTEGT WHERE POSSIBLE. VERIFY ALL MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CONNECTION EXISTING ZONING ........................................................................... RUT N I,. PATHWAY TO R_8 TREES TO BE REMOVED WITH MERIDIAN GIN FORESTER PRIOR Tp REMOVAL, 1 . PROPOSED ZONING 3-3 1 �� - N . NEIGHBORING ( i'P) PATHWAY SYSTEM PLAYGROUND 8 (TYP) SEATING AREA - z 4-3 1 I i DEGIDU U SHADE I ..•. J ORNAMENTAL 1 - FLAN7 FAL�E77n TREE (TYP) 6-3 1 •! • ` . . SYM GOMMON NAME BOTANIGAL NAME SIZE SYM DESGRIPTION GLUSTER MAILBOX PAD W. WIND DRIFT ST. EVERGREEN TREES AUSTRIAN PINE PINU5 NIGRA 6-8' HT BaB 7-3 1 7-6 BLACK HILLS SPRUGE PIGEA GLAUGA `DEN5ATA' 6-8' HT B$B 50D 1 1 - T - - - - _ ■rq FAT ALBERT BLUE SPRUGE PIGEA PUNGENS 'FAT ALBERT' 6-8' HT B$B LAWN T MOONGLOW JUNIPER JUNIPERU5 SGOPLULORUM 'MOOGLOW' 6-8' HT B$B NORWAY SPRUGE Pi GEA AB IE5 6-8' HT B$B 1---5 1 10-5 8-6 VANDERWOLFS PINE PINUS FLEXILIS 'VANDERWOLFS' 6-8' HT BtB 6 SOLID VINYL FENGE 8-3 1 1 SHADE TREES (GLASS III) ALONG PERIMETER PROPERTY LINES (TYP). BLOODGOOD LONDON PLANETREE PLATANUS x AGERI FOL 1A 'BLOODGOOD' 2" GAL B$B { 2-5 1 9-5 1 1 9_6 NORTHERN RED OAK OUERGUS RUBRA 2" GAL B1B 9-3 1 1 1 1 I N I - Y 1 FENGE ADJAG NE P TO 6 5OLID VINYL SHADEISTREET TREES (GLASS 11) GOMMON AREAS (TYP). i - F 1 PERIMETER 5<YL i NE HONEYLOCU5T &LED I TSI A TRIAGANTHOS 1 NERMI5 'SiCYGOLE' 2" GAL P 4 B I� 10-3 3-5 1 8-5 1 � 1 10-6 FENCE (TYP) B LITTLELEAF LINDEN TILIA GORDATA 2" GAL $B 1 z 1 1 1 1z 1 PAGIFIG SUNSET MAPLE AGER TRUNGATUM x A. PLATANOIDE5 'WARRENRED' 2" GAL B&B EXISTING FENGING TULIP TREE LIRODENDRON TULIPIFERA 2" GAL BM B {�'P} 1 1-3 1 1 4-5 1 7-5 1 1 ± 11-6 ORNAMENTAL FREES (GLASS 1) 1 GHANTIGLEER PEAR PYRUS GALLERYANA 'GLEN'S FORM' 2" GAL B$B GANADA RED GHOKEGHERRY PRUNU5 V IRG I N I ANA 'C ANADA RED' 6-8' HT- MULTI-STEM _ - - - VISION TRIANGLE GRUZAN GRUSADER HAWTHORN GRATAEGUS GRUS-GALLI 'GRUZAM' 2" GAL B$B GONNEGTION 1 (TYP) HOTWING5 MAPLE AGER TATARIGUM 'GARANN' 6-8' HT. MULTI-STEM PATHWAY 12-3 5-5 1 6-5 12-6 ROYAL RAINDROPS GRABAPPLE MALUS x 'JFS-KW5' 2" GAL B$B (TYP) — �. SPRING 5NOW GRABAPPLE MALUS '5PRINC75NOW' 2" GAL BBB 5HRUB510RNAMENTAL 6RA55E5IPERENNIAL5 _ ARIZONA SUN GAILLARI- GAILLARDIA x 'ARIZONA SUN' I GAL 0 o T W. pUDD 5-F, - - - _ BLACK EYED SUSAN RUDBEGKIA FULGIDA 'COLOSTRUM' I GAL OWNER 14-3 ii BLUE GRAMMA GRASS BOUTELOUA GRAGILIS 'BLONDE AMBITION' I GAL BLUE M15T SPIREA GARYOPTER15 x GLANDONENSIS 'BLUE MIST' 2 GAL HAYDEN HOMES IDAHO, LLC BLUE OAT GRASS HEL IGTOTRI GHON SEMPERV I RENS I GAL Tl M MAK WA / •• BLUE RUG JUNIPER JUNIFERUS HORIZONTALIS 'WILTONI' 3 GAL 1406 N MAIN ST., STE 109 PURPLE GONEFLOWER EGHINAGEA PURPUREA I GAL 1 I I 1 1 1 1 RED FLOWER CARPET ROSE ROSA FLOWER CARPET- NOARE 2 GAL MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 1 1 a 1 DARTS GOLD NINEBARK PHYSOGARPUS OPULIFOLIUS 'DART'S GOLD' 5 GAL 15-3 16-3 17-3 18-3 19-3 20-3 21-3{ 22-3 1 STELLA DE ORO DAYLILLY HEMEROGALLIS 'STELLA D'ORO' I GAL 1 r 1 2-4 3-4 FINE LINE BUCKTHORN RHAMNU5 FRAGULA 'RON WILLIAMS' 5 GAL 1 1 1 1 r 1 I GRO-LOW SUMAC RHUS AROMATIGA 'GRO-LOW' 5 GAL ENGINEER 1 _ EVERGREEN 1 SHRUBi BED 1 LANDSGAPE 3- MONUMENT' HUSKER RED PENSTEMON PENSTEMDN DIGITAL 15 'HUSKER RED' I GAL .-- -- i ERICKSON CIVIL INC. r' TREE (TYP) (TYP) BU ER (TYP) SIGN I IVORY HALO DOGWOOD GORNU5 ALBA 'BAILHALO' 5 GAL ROSS ERICKSON�, H.E. % KARL FORRSTER REED GRASS GALAMA61R05T15 ARUNDINAGEA 'K,F.' 1 GAL MAIDEN GRASS MI5GANTHUS 5INENSI5 '6RAGILLIMU5' I COAL 6213 N CLOVERDALE RD, STE 125 BRAKELIGHTS RED YUGGA HE5PERALOE PARVIFLORA 'PERPA' I C7AL BOISE, IDAHO 83705 IF SUMMERW I NE N I NEBARK PHY50GARPU5 OPUL I FOLI A '5EWAR7' 5 GAL W. USTICK RD, -----_------------------------------- - ----- - -- --- _--_--_- -��\, �r���--- __- - 1 f IV '►11111111�1j��. � r JENSENBELTS NOVEMBER 9, 2020 5 = ASSOCIATES 65 cz 0' 50' 100, 150' ' St■PWninq I Landac"AroMectr■ ; T w�p°9'�MERIDIANi IDAHO PRELIMINARY PLAT LANDSCAPE PLAN ;D , �txa vv_rffg wwwJww■brlcom NORTH SCALE I" = 50' TETHEROW CROSSING SUBDIVISION QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE (11-3G-3.B.4) F-1 QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE (11-3G-3.B.1.A' (50'X100'AND PLAYGROUND AMENITY) F-1 QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE MICRO-PATHWAY (11-3G-3.1) QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE SEATING, PET STATION AMENITY (11-3G NON-QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE F—I COMMON - SHARED DRIVEWAY F1BUILDING LOT --------------- F-1 RIGHT OF WAY COMMON LOTS&BUFFERS QUALIFIED C,'L,ALIFIED ACTUAL OPEN OPEN AREA SPACE SPACE ;SF) CREDIT AREA(SF) HA_F OF 25-FOOT W. USTICK RD.BUFE Ell;11-3C-3.BAJ 5,134 100% 5,134 P-AYGROUND&O?EN SPACE LOT 1-6[50'X 100'MIN.] 11-3G-3-B.L.A) 33,457 100% 33,e�-57 OPEN SPACE BENC-i=S,TRASH, PET STATION-_OT 1-3 3,567 109% 3,867 M_CRO-PnTHWAYS LOT 13-3 1,970 209% 2,970 OPEN SPACE-OTHE3 NON QUAUF ED 3.057 4fb SHARED DRIVEWAYS 2,409 oc-b TOTAL OPEN SPACE =9,594 5F a ,=28 SF QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: 44,429 S 13.46% TOTAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: 49,994 S 15,12% N Open Space & Site Coverage 0 160 320 Feet i / 1 o4.s' B � f 8W 81 1970 S 8W W 8W 8W CONCRETE TRASH PAD s 11 s.o' �o co d ° e ° O Lv e 14-3 ° 3194 SF °d ° d 00 °CONCRETE SHARED DRIVEWAY N d 47.0" ° 4 0' ° e 41 ° ° 42.0' Z ----- —To-- — -- —————— —O�- 7— r N ° • ° a N . FRONT f FRONT FRONT - I BUILDING SETBACKS L—BUILDING SETBACKS L—BUILDING SETBACKS I 15-3 a I 4723 SF _ I I o I 4201 S o 3F I I I o 17 I 4zo1 SF I I I 10.00' 5.00' 1 1 5.00' 5.00' 5.00' 5.00' I I I FENCE(TYP.) CD 4PI C2 4PI 4PI 4PI nj O 4PI 4PI 4PIh04 4PI 4PI— 18GI 47.418GI 8GI 18GI 42.08GI in 18GI 18GI 42.o'18GI 1 SGI 23-3 3942 SF- ---- N Shared Driveway Exhibit 0 20 40 ) I Feet � I \ 35' W.C. \ PLS 11511 \ I � \ I ILLEGIBLE I I I I I I I I I I I w I j� Kj I I Z r� N EXISTING HOME $ I W Ns I I ; I 5.0' 3B-_0"— • 40.0' 50�' .0, 1125. 32.8 4P / 4PI 4PI N --- -------- v '� 331„ 1234 S�\ d III I 1-STORY 1-STORY 1-STORY 1-STORY I ----- I ' ° I 5-2 4-2 3-2 g 2-2 1-2 /-s 1 5823 SF o 4771 SF o 4139 SF 11,870 SF 1039 S L M4 30��p 2 I 8 L--- — 55.1' 26.6' aW si. ri 8W SW 81.8' N Concept Development Plan Adjacent Property to North 0 60 120 Feet TOE TOE I \ T P TO 4PI 4PI o N:718484.1876 N - - --- ---- ----- o� I o E:2450283.1522 8"IE:2566.38 � / V ____ _ \ \tea'- I STA:2+02.87,0.00 � 0 0 N I� I I 1 \Voff E � --_� 00 1 \ \ `AI wpppP\ ,�5/ SSMH#13 STA: 1+07.80 OFF:0.00 N: 718476.1098 \ / RIM:2570.80 I '� t o o f �+00 N 29 E:245L 8"IE IN:2566.68(W) 1 o f J,SSMH#1� / 4"I 8"IE OUT:2566.58(E) I STA:7+70.38 OFF: -587.86E RIM:2574.18 - ✓8"IE IN:2565.71 (W) � 01 0 45.12'OF 8"SDR 35 PVC @ 0.446% 8W awSDIP- 41 06$ 0 i 0 i I SSMH#12 /I I- u_ - - 13 ' i i STA: 7+24.74 OFF:-569.70L 4+27 4+00 RIM:2572.84 SSMH#14 y 8"IE IN:2566.01 (W) STA: 1+07.85 OFF: 70.54R- + I o \ w1 8"IE IN:2566.01 N n� RIM:2570.71, o 66.55'OF 8"SDR 35 PVC @ 0.700% \ I 8"IE OUT:2565.91 (E) ru 8"IE OUT:2567.15(E)_� Y 4"IE IN:2567.48(NW)`F ° - N: 718355.6812 E:2450150.3056 I 4"IE:2565.49 4071 1 \ \ i I� FG:2571.49 CONTACT DICILINE N SSMH#10 / 48-HOURS - - - - 46.00'OF 8"SDR 35 PVC @ 0.730% STA:2+00.87 OFF:0.00 RIM:2571.50 T I , - 1-800-342-1585 I SSMH#9 8"IE OUT:2564.34 S "'r� STA: 2+50.87 OFF: 0.00 O I / 4"IE IN:2564.68(NW) I / I RIM:2571.72 I 1 8"IE IN: 2564.00(N) I ' Z 1 8" IE OUT: 2563.90(S) �I o (� O 4PI 4PI \ / J cn 00 I 1 - ------ --- J > o o e x 0 m 1 Q cA p zz I W + i i I LLI Q U I I I I � O O N:718205.2828 I I 301 do-L 2 U w 35.86'OF 8"SDR 35 PVC @ 0.778% 301 Z � E:2450326'8075 I aamn l4 N � ° 4"IE:2565.70 � STA: 5+64.63 OFF: 0.00 LLI O -w1 p _ _ RIM:2571.47 w I I QI 571 1 �8"IE OUT:2564.' SE _ ~ w 8W 8W 8W 61.05'OF 8"SDR 35 C @ 0.437% � 0 10 1 7t64 7+00 ° 6+00 D A I co ROAD-3 x S�ONAL EN I I o o - - ' I \ �_ �G\ST I I a + I - - - - - - ------ SSMH#5- __---- SSMH#3 1 0813 a STA:6+04.48 OFF:0.00 0 �- STA:4+92.59 OFF: 0.00 N uu I I M RIM:2571.63 1 '�' RIM:2571.78 �,� p I N 8"IE OUT:2564.53(E) 8"IE IN:2563.88(NW) 9TF CF �pP� I - - 4"IE IN:2564.86(NW)- 8"IE OUT:2563.78(S) �sS K ER\��So - - - - o I c i 1 i I ao I I I I v i 1 i I I I • • M I I I I I 1 . . . • ,� m1 .. .. .. - - • . . . I I I I I M o I I I I I Lo I D o ao I 1 .� o 1 i I co I I I I co O I 1 w 2 z l i II I co o SSMH#8 1 o I i1 �I I oa STA: 5+99.94 OFF: 3.65R RIM:2572.07 g )I -SSMH#2 `" 8"IE IN:2562.47 N ( ) I I l i 1 1 1 STA:2+83.54 OFF: 0.00 1 8"IE OUT:2562.37(SE) 1 34.06'OF 8"SDR 35 PVC @ 0.434%I RIM:2572.70 �N 8" IE IN:2561.21 (N) 00 zz PZ I o -------- - ----- 8"IE IN:2561.21 (W) 8"IE IN: 2561.21 (E) oz B 8"IE OUT:2561.11 (S) o 8W I o 8 8W W ��_ _ 7+00 i I i I 8+00 119.53'OF 8"SDR 35 PVC @ 0.420% .79i +78 ° 215.11'OF 8"SDR 35 PVC @ 0.424% KU ROAD-2 1 ROAD-2 �o _ <4 _ _SSMH#7 ' ' - �TOP STA:6+36.06 OFF:3.83R-;- '- ----- - - N N �a I °' 1 �- 1 1 RIM:2571.88 /�- - SSMH - CONCEPT ENGINEERING PLANS 3 8 IE IN:2562.22(NW) I I 1 1 STA:9+77.70 OFF:0.00 1 I 1 8 IE OUT:2562.12(E) 1 I I o 1 RIM:2573.28 0 40 80 1 8"IE OUT:2561.71 (W) Feet �x I I o 1 U) z 03 1 cco 1 1 Z Q I 1 �°p 1 1 J L An I I I 1 I ICI M I � Z ----- - 4Pi 4P1 4 1 PI I o I t----------� � \�---- � � 26 Lu 0 4PI i i 4PI 4PI O 4 I 4PI 4PI LLI z r 3 $ co 77-7 0 00 181.E 0 - ? TOE 7� w O 0 N m -CKS A - 18 Pv ' �t8 Pvc Z d � 2Q 8 PVC EL=2574.53 „ OF LLI 0 W LLI d LL Q a � ° HP 0- 0- 0 Li 00 SSMH#1 EX. w° p � JOB NUMBER: Lu STA:0+91.47 OFF: -17.19E 1 U 00 I D B2096 W W RIM:2574.66- Z - - 8"IE IN:2559.81 (N) DATE: 9-19-20 -ss ss ss ss ss ss ��"•� ^^"r - - - - - G W W W U SHEET NUMBER: ss ss QO Lt1L� . ., + - - - - LVUL.JF w ss--- -t1TtC�C _ - - - -- RA�IS OF RFARIKI(` - SS SS Ss ss « w CEml w w 0+80 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 4+40 0+80 1+00 2+00 2+40 Lo 2580 2580 2580 2580 p W L ti Li Z p ti W 0 O LL.t In _ r u- LL r u- Z 4L t '� N ~ O co N LL co 0 co LL C ►n x N ? Ncm ti N H p 0 Co co N � � COo `n 2576 �' — _ " N _ _ *� 2576 2576In q + ti .CD 2576 � z x z N W x N W — w W r ti Nyd' co � � — Nc~A oo NH � - f) EE co - co) co cc co co FINISHED GRADE @PIPE CIL APPROXIMATE EXISTING GRADE @PIPE CIL 2572 2572 2572 2572 r7 APPROXIMATE EXISTING FINISHED GRADE @ PIPE CIL GRADE @ PIPE CIL 2568 2568 2568 2568 130.68' F 8"SDR 5 PVC @ 0. 33% 91.76' F 8"SDR 3 PVC @ 0.4 0% 1 1+ 9 , 8"I :2566.50 2564 66.55'OF 8"SDR 5 PVC @ 0. 00% 2564 2564 "- ' 2564 ' VERT.SCALE:.1"=3' VERT.SCALE:1"=3' CONTACT DIGLINE 48-HOURS 2562 i 12562 2562 2562 BEFORE DIGGING 0+80 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 4+40 0+80 1+00 2+00 2+40 1-800-342-IM 1+80 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 2580 2580 z O U O O 3 —j U) M _ O .� W W __ LL ^ J N M CDu- Q O Z 1` LLLL r LL `••'" zo O m O NGo O N ~'it N cc :0 CN w0 N co 0 N N N ti N N Q CR co M LL a! ticoo N N O co co W co t W) 0 ��1 c LL M O O I-- M N H M N N N = O) N O — (D -. 2576 N O N to `N N ~ _ + — N N — — W 2576 U) z Q c � = Nw W � Q w w � a wLuw NNd' oo W co 0_ x N 0 N N 0 co) y -- 00 N co 5o N N Co 0o CD O 0' III x O Lu Go z APPROXIMATE EXISTING W O GRADE @ PIPE CIL p Lu -i = 2572 2572 Q _ Lu w w ~ z O a FINISHED GRADE @ PIPE CIL ASS\ONAL FNG� ST ERA /jiF 2568 2568 a� 10813 -9 9TF OFLOU 34. 6' 3F 8"SDR 35 PVC @ 0. 34% `S K PE 2564 • 5 . . . •346 00'OF 8"SDR 35 PVC 0.412% .. .. 0 •• . .. 00c. 6.00'OF 8"SDR 35 PVC @ 0.730% VERT.SCALE: „ AU ° ' 119.53' F 8"SDR ° ' co m 2560 2560 • 1+80 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 0+70 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 6+40 2580 2580 Qo � o= U O as O rZ O om ^ v r O � U O O o 0 N N r O N O W go Lq Ln ti Y07 LOC) N LL Z LL LL w ll Ln 0 N N � COD 0 N Cp 409 o z 2576 FINISHED GRADE @ PIPE CIL `" N W W 0 m Inco N -e ;o cro 2576 Q rL _ — LLJ N rN H rN In+ 03 V) cococo2 N Z 0 j N Z O N W a z � � Q � w o �^ APPROXIMATE EXISTING N > ~ — ' N oo D GRADE @PIPE CIL I J _JJ ¢U I Z N O <w LL 2572 257210 Li 0 W z� \ �a J Ow Y W ¢3 U) o H 2568 Z ssM o#1 Ex. 2568 Z �Y � g3 STA:0+91.47 OFF:-17.19L Q RIM:2574.66 a 8"IE IN:2559.81 ( ) Z WW z } 5 ,610 W Jcoco � 2564 2564 Z_ a m z (� W O N N m �'SDR 35 PV @ 1.253% v 2 5.07'OF8 Z ui 0 w LU--u Z W o w w � � Of a o H 61.0 'OF 8"SD 35 PVC .437% 0.688% @ W 1 8.84=F ' DR 35 PVC@ JOB NUMBER: v IDB2096 2560 L J UAKW V RT.SCALE:'1'=3' ' 5.86'OF 8"SDR 35 PV @ 0.778% 2560 O DATE: 9-19-20 SHEET NUMBER: Li 2558 2558CEm2 0+70 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 6+40 W W f• J' 0000 —— — .Wow- -AWE � I � BOOM •r � � ram. �1 - - - � - - _ � � �- � ' 1p fit`• +y�L r� r� - _ if de 3 f J 1 y r -- `�.j�� ,Fib a f ti ; .r- k '•] 'x��� � - f fl -�M� — � �-M� � .+�� I_I - MCI i_•. _ � IL f e ID low a4k ¢ ] '.. r rY tFa Zdw Ji yrr L -- r�#� 'y'i!'f I - r �. '�I..x� �*+ � .• �i .. ti 't _ _ •4 ��� - ��� * ;j �a� I 1J` { .k ' }_ f' �hr• L 4 J 'a: } I r a }i'� _ } � _ � •�} � � J ti I r MI r Y �Ir•• J y '� z r y e• {�_id{. . ti % �lk rr• R 11 R ti ".f 5 + r 'r - �� r ti _ L + _ w # •'err t•-•�•S �•f -J•� - :+ �T + {' y y fir, y 4 a - "� l • • +'}' IV ~ J - �+ a n nii _�a++kkee'' �4 J .L — k l•; �.. - { ��•y }� F � M eu 3 16, ' + �•,.n •� L .. Jyy' `fir' ��`4 -- �'- -- - 1 1' • J� l •J k - F- 1, k } k l k 7 ___ r t t# i3` , 1 .4 e c ��+" i��' E�� � � - ;�:If• J r P. ti r �� -J S '• rt.�� r y M1 � V• + 1 { + 7 IF lb i f• k r ask tT k ■ }. * v * h+ '''i �ti +� 1,. , kAmw yef� 1 _ * ! •5. ti rr 1 # F �\ a jL ti :e y t �L t A t - •` - r' �` yl+ I -7• L h •r f I. ■ yp �r+ { 1 } •y k. '•Iy .k irti ti[ 1 *' i y,� n r c �� - �' �' �( 2•'•• J ' L �I•� y r'■ ' '� y r i �' e '' 1L t L: •1 +•1 "{'.�,iI J -° - J S it 66 * I�l.r•M •� `� t:�I T ■ *' ¢ , k�•• -L �i #L r• r.• y -ti` k •'� , X _y ti - �rt� +k ` � �.• _, J t•' +•r� * _, .� a h1,y ,F k, ii - r - 1e ti .`• I+a '•r L ;�Jyr •_ - - ti• 5-a r -y. -* i iti�i`*t't y r y{}F e T' � 1 +3 •f I -tY i1 L� • •'•• }e• L iw 4',� . I. �Y}7� { L e r J 'f• }e+ y+ �} T +} L F L .4, 7r}�t '- �vl .`• 'i � - p y •k�- ��++ k +5 '•,+* 1 .r { .li _ L 4 S OJT .� �. 6 �4 rk �L% ` ti t %IM1 + -- Tr- —_ - h� L '! 1' '• + ya F k k- '*Y 1+ µ k L 5� ,* ry r { + T % F I I s - wIr I _ R akWF + _ dF tip• ` • a � .• • � L J a r f ti + V• # #� IV J• f #PEIa +�"!� �J jri � �r F — } rdoipp- 6 � JEW 'Amif 1 J r 1 - f s I EL ad I Al _ Ml _ -PI . _— v do f _ 4 = F X- �. r � y 9ir i rs Y MI -PE— OPM _ OF y■r171 k � T) dv — r Y c kpI a i _ r Nm iff .40 696 IN TTW Ip will Em rip AW i �e ti 1 PO4L ' ` + ! y■ 4 9.7 - f �.� L j • ' - --'--' - i�4 r i,.� iM -- - - - "' it `�+ ir ..� �� ti * ■ - _ - • - �+G r+ } 5f .may S• ' `' f r } { Y Ir. i 4 Kl f r 1,13 `� � 1. F ; t• ..ri�•,''1'''+� { `�•� z �� - r � , r R } 1 a _ _ _ •I _ r _ :r Jl i` ` �• ■- € y - - L.�:. f - - ' {{ 1 y� 4 L, 1: ' 1?f ' ■ ry `4 ■ IF f �++.h r`J + r '� �ti +_ } � r r �'r•ti� r [ *_ .w ■ } ; } L r yr ; F_ IF + ' - - XZZ r _ ,j. z' yr� a _ .r iF 3 iR _ {L ` r " - yr ''�. ;s '*. � •{' - •ice r - T.� — - �} - -+' '; ,��t -r '� - F r� r�� L7 �' } r � f �' ,• } -r' _ ; J ■ ' �jF _ / 'tip ' +� •�+ �* or }+� r + o #� r -. Tyr 5 f �' J 1� • {�'+ . L r �. f - ti +�+,rT ',p.P 'mil r �! r -ram - r , f - I r r {t ' F � i r �r } r -� rti� r �l } � !- :..ti r f- ti _ r ' 60 tip'. ( J }� _ - . 7 5 �+�• - - r !. r 4' �1 tea• t r' 7 rY jr+l } ■ _ _ f •��� ��� k . . y#��� ,..� ��,h• t R_ �■rl, � ■ _ VMW fi �' L + F. L 1 1 'fir '. r +� ' r • r 5 ,+ PPrt I r + f r L # f• Iy ar f' r f i _ � � ' ■ � -� �� L jl + x *} � + �}• 1 ��' ■ — y. Or T .1 -,+ .r.f■r - ``f �r i"'•' �,F f +1 ��'r + +pia * ��� 1 I + � r i ` + 1 }, R r ■. 7 } 1 r+` r 5 F s F` 4F ti } r'f + r `f. '� .N I f - yl T L f F - - �po • - - f r�• f+rt' *. 4 , rr # . r� t J r ' f 1 F * ■ y 7� _ h'. a € 1 F'+ r =vp + - rJ�'i r.,�r_I •� #' : M� .1 1 y. T x_ f f r �_ L� 1 r � 4f IV r * J t +1 ! 1 r iJr J �•L� ra - +1'�r l.",# } r�+ fi 1 1 ■ • r Y :r� - F r y - r. 5 - ,�, r i 4 ,N.''■: Ja sL_ A�'Ti=r } }# '�� J �y. ~,'_, •� r• . •• i 4 F t� r` •r !r '� } f I' ■ kr r' F r { ■ 1 f 1d ■ �i' { - • r { 7 1 ~ .. r— %; r '; + a f r +#, r 111 F +r �� + ' I��s ~ I F + { { 1 f # Yryr �. r . �{' ' . r��. �' .. ■ � _ •.T1 F •��1 �JI� � Iar• - � � `�F• T . �Fi � — � 1 � 1 IL _ - -jF , . #101 � f IL ■ � � �* �, _ •_ _ �Tyr� - _ k �. _ _ � - '' �` - - F - - -- - t � *� •+ � � Ad fop r• L Y f + E0 ID �' N - - 7668 � " 7 _ - 6 - ' • # - I ' lw T OF mop- jL +'t M t Y�• ' ' lam. ' Y ' L halt # '� } > ti ti ' �•�# •: \ 7 _ — ,� T 1 '- ' L. T�, . r � � PRIVATE V� + ei +' - 4• ti,t't ' , P. ry ry •=' r 1 tiA e' �r 1 N '�'. stir- �T •# M� Tra T t y YLIP -�, Y= t - - t - . . � � „ ti_. . RESIDENT Vim, fff }. T; t r * � � �•�4` _�rs -* � _ ��.. � A � � i . :I '� f. _` 1Y'F+'4�''�*Y�J���r}, w iy �� ■ + �~ r � - `�4 f_f �i�i _;YT} � .- _ � � -_ .__ �i-fir ir L .'T'"� at• i* .�j �..'�,• ' , k �': '�5 - 4 ■ ! # ■ t �t y ., '; •_ _ t+ - — --__ - ,fl * ti;f i � if �r� `�tl ' ;' Y '- - 46 _ -y r �ti jL { e f4Y� ,. F �' *' t ti �•.. _ #I'h k •5 w' ti Fy r. ~ l r' �+ Ill { . * � � � t � h F r. ity�~ ' +:4 � •'¢ 1 ��y � Tr .., ti �k� 1 �4 �• i�� '' . JI M1 •.� 4' ' i s q '• ■ r { ~ "+ ; ' ' ''� a - % ti �ti to#� ■ �', Y Y�' t 1 's r y - w' . a j r ' M1' �a � J ' E' y• � t a + } T �.; 'tr l . + r1 + r f' 5 �i. �i } * •� _ t �• a4 t4 + �•'* r }�+ yam +T * ti - f ~ •` . * } l 1_y,.. •+ ,t x t �' ' '+ ~ i kti _ - •��'t�.L 'ti- F911 ., ,+ _ y`';,}✓r r. F + _ ' - - s - -- ram,' s . . x ='� }•' 'r y �y} 'F 1_��■ v T + .F � s ■ ti ' ' +� }' x { Tr '4.� ' a ��L 4 - A ++�.r x. + { '� R� - � Pr ~Y r � T �� s t .+`. t ��* r. y i, t R Err �• r Jr3� 1r .i. i 7 y r+� Y� # �r �tr �,{, ._ r �_� '; #,i iT +� r. '� OL F' INS is ``f � * � t � �M �r�•�■.+ t _ .t, ._ / + - 'F + - - ,y�.�Ip � ` • ; a ,t %ems M. * . , • T r ' L 1 # y J 17 firs f~� �r tr+ "'�i } �d +f ■ 1'}�`#r a-'i _ r� % I v t- ,rr A i i - r i r rr AL _ L a y — — bpm r � ` `—�r� — — — r� Jb IL 90 or JJ _ � ��f�•r lr � + }' # d' # 441 + F ` 1 - � Qom ' ` IF f �1■ i is ' + F lw IP - 10 or 4A ql 16 qd ti r r krkr TLL. T 41r ' + r *• L ti *•L 16 arm 4F 1 �• �� 11 � I � �� :}# Y I��l y .-ate r F' �� Rp fi•.[ :.No PRIVATE I M� F dL IL 06 y�� I ,,,;,fir' I.i - - S+ r{h - •''rY. r _ 'r '•y� =r - �� '+'- *hN" # �! JA 5 �_� �•T �' ' • 4e J. ti y� W ; k-� e .; +�*•yam..__ l 4 � Y . � �- FA irp #,r� - r. �r�.IFr' `r -ram• +.:t+F f�at` +� ��f + r - +�• r =�-t-. �r f '•�' — _ - Am. Iota— --Mmpcw- 4 + s �y _ • .. r •' � X t i r l 10 F r { 4 r L ff. i- — y 1 i ry _ v 1 a 4 � S 4 • - 1 # � ■ — inmmL— �, .. pop F i { Ilk - -- Ag 7. s • �. + ti F I I " Ap Jyf ,tis •-ors p ivit4CE t NMI � � � •�� � •�'4- - ' '{'-' _ti •Ll.`p� �*.k� r;�`�� `� 4 �`�i,� r., - Ij' . +.4 ' •IL 0 dip- IL �S •o ti •¢ '�5 � a — _ — PPI- - Or- MEN- Ir -INN - _ — — Inq WO 'pop r , _ r� � ._ � '� � i' �� ',,ti_ '�•�—� �—_�� _ - { %p_ IP 106 AMMI ' r Ave,Norm: 0 -. !t r s � i � 1 t t ■ - r Ir f - ` _ ei 1 � t i r i -I 7 *' 4 71 MeGUARD e(;U • M1 k i-l-AYDEN M E s ItAYD -D H 0 -R �� � �en-hornes.com M s yf 11 a y d-e n h c rn C:io rn HOM Ellaydon-hoM.O. H 0 M E S �� Fz 91 ARD t _ horneGUARD horneGUARD y � hornyo � � off[op.rin# r y �y■�� �� r ;� - �_ _ - �. 114A E { _ ,i A r 0 F M , Y * !l h c) 0.0 rill omes TL r eGu JD S , PA db low NSTRUCTIO14 4 Ir 4f co i k _ CLEAN � � � .� � � •� � 0 7hank 8 ir OA4 ES _ + py JL _ .rj Yam' IL —MI r -Af� ' WI �+ l f GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION FOR "DENNIS CREEK SUBDIVISION" — A 7.5+ ACRE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED NORTH OF WEST USTICK ROAD AND EAST OF NORTH LINDER ROAD, MERIDIAN, IDAHO August 26, 2020 GTI-Project No. 2149-ID Prepared For: HAYDEN HOMES 2464 SW Glacier Place, Suite 110 Redmond, OR 97756 GeoTek, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPEOF SERVICES .......................................................................................................................................... SITEDESCRIPTION.............................................................................................................................................2 PROPOSEDDEVELOPMENT............................................................................................................................2 FIELDSTUDIES......................................................................................................................................................2 REGIONALGEOLOGY......................................................................................................................................2 SITESOILS..............................................................................................................................................................3 ArtificialFill ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 NativeAlluvial Soils........................................................................................................................................ 3 SURFACE & GROUND WATER......................................................................................................................4 TECTONIC FAULTING AND REGIONAL SEISMICITY............................................................................4 Secondary Seismic Constraints....................................................................................................................4 Summary:..........................................................................................................................................................4 RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTING.........................................................................................................5 CONCLUSIONS...................................................................................................................................................5 RECOMMENDATIONS - EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION.................................................................5 General .............................................................................................................................................................5 Demolition.......................................................................................................................................................5 Removals/Processing - General...................................................................................................................6 TransitionalPads.............................................................................................................................................7 ExcavationDifficulty.......................................................................................................................................7 FillPlacement...................................................................................................................................................7 ImportMaterial...............................................................................................................................................7 Observationand Testing...............................................................................................................................8 GroundWater................................................................................................................................................8 EarthworkSettlements..................................................................................................................................8 RECOMMENDATIONS — FOUNDATIONS.................................................................................................8 General .............................................................................................................................................................8 Conventional Foundation Recommendations..........................................................................................9 FoundationSettlement..................................................................................................................................9 PAVEMENT SECTIONS .................................................................................................................................... 10 Pavement Construction and Maintenance.............................................................................................. 10 OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................................................... SiteImprovements........................................................................................................................................ Landscape Maintenance and Planting........................................................................................................ GeoTek, Inc. SoilCorrosion............................................................................................................................................... TrenchExcavation........................................................................................................................................ 12 OnsiteUtility Trench Backfill..................................................................................................................... 12 Drainage.......................................................................................................................................................... 12 PLANREVIEW..................................................................................................................................................... 13 LIMITATIONS...................................................................................................................................................... 13 Enclosures: Figure #1 , Site Vicinity Map Figure #2, Site Exploration Plan Appendix A, References Appendix B, Test Pit Logs Appendix C, Field Test Results Appendix D, Laboratory Test Results GeoTek, Inc. GeoTek,Inc. 320 East Corporate Drive Suite 300 Meridian,I❑ 83642-35 1 1 (208)888-7010 (208)888-7924 www.geotekusa.com August 26, 2020 Project No. 2149-ID HAYDEN HOMES 2464 SW Glacier Place, Suite 110 Redmond, OR 97756 Attention: Mr. Tim Mokwa Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation for"Dennis Creek Subdivision"—a 7.5±Acre Residential Development— Located North of West Ustick Road and East of North Linder Road, Meridian, Idaho Dear Mr. Mokwa, In accordance with your request, GeoTek, Inc. (GTI) has completed a geotechnical evaluation of the subject property for the construction of a single-family residential development with associated improvements. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the soils underlying the site and to provide recommendations for project design and construction based on our findings. This report outlines the geologic and geotechnical conditions of the site based on current data and provides earthwork and construction recommendations with respect to those conditions. SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of our services has included the following: I. Review of soils and geologic reports and maps for the site (Appendix A) 2. Site reconnaissance 3. Review of aerial photographs 4. Excavating and logging of five (5) exploratory test pits (Appendix B) 5. Obtaining samples of representative soils, as the exploratory test pits were advanced 6. Performing laboratory testing on representative soil samples (Appendix D) 7. Assessment of potential geologic constraints 8. Engineering analysis regarding foundation design/construction,foundation settlement,and site preparation 9. Preparation of this report GEOTECHNICAL I ENVIRONMENTAL I MATERIALS DENNIS CREEK SUBDIVISION AUGUST 26, 2020 HAYDEN HOMES PAGE 2 PROJECT NO. 2149-ID SITE DESCRIPTION The project site consists of an irregularly shaped parcel totaling approximately 7.5± acres that is generally bound by a single-family home and Sawtooth Middle School to the north, a single-family home and residential subdivision with associated improvements to the east,West Ustick Road to the south, and vacant agricultural land to the west (Figures I and 2). Currently, the property consists of farmland that has been corrugated/irrigated and cultivated for crop farming purposes over many years. The site is bisected by a gravel road (North Llama Lane)that serves as a driveway for the single-family residence to the north of site. Access to the site is currently possible from North Llama Lane. From topographic maps, the site's elevation is approximately 2,568± feet to 2,577± feet above mean sea level. Historically, topography generally directs surface water to the northwest. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT It is our understanding that site development would consist of performing typical cut and fill earthwork to attain the desired graded configuration(s) for the construction of a residential subdivision of one- to two-story detached single-family residential structures with associated improvements. It is further assumed that final site grade will be within 5 feet of existing site grade. FIELD STUDIES Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by using a rubber-tired backhoe. Five (5) test pits were advanced onsite.A log of each exploration is included within this report in Appendix B. Four(4) percolation tests were performed on the subject site as well as four (4) initial ground water measurements (Appendix C). Field studies were completed during July of 2020 by field personnel who conducted field excavation location mapping, logged the excavations, and obtained samples of representative soils for laboratory testing.The approximate locations of the explorations are indicated on the enclosed Site Exploration Plan (Figure 2). The Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) was used to visually classify the subgrade soils during the field exploration. REGIONAL GEOLOGY The subject site is situated within the Boise River Valley, which comprises the northwestern portion of the Snake River Plain physiographic province. The western portion of the Snake River Plain is aligned in a northwest-southeast direction and generally divides the Owyhee mountains to the south from the Central Idaho mountains toward the north (Wood and Clemens, 2004). The headwaters of the Boise River are located in the Central Idaho mountains east of Boise, Idaho. The river leaves the central mountains and enters the Snake River Plain near Barber and drains toward the west into the Snake River near Parma. The Owyhee mountains and the Central Idaho Mountains are composed predominantly of volcanic and igneous rocks. The western portion of the Snake River Plain is a northwest trending complex graben formed by extension and regional uplift along the northern boundary of the basin and range province (Wood and Clemens, 2004). The graben generally forms a basin which has been partially filled with younger sedimentary and volcanic rocks (Malde, 1991). GeoTek, Inc. DENNIS CREEK SUBDIVISION AUGUST 26, 2020 HAYDEN HOMES PAGE 3 PROJECT NO. 2149-ID The Boise River Valley is bounded on the northeast by the Boise Front,which is a northwest trending topographic high extending generally from Boise to Emmett, Idaho. The Boise Front consists of Cretaceous aged granitic and metamorphic rocks cut by Tertiary aged rhyolite and overlain with Miocene aged lake sediments (Wood and Clemens, 2004). These units have been cut by northwest trending faults which down drop these units toward the southwest. The faults also provide conduits for Quaternary aged basalt intrusions and flows (Malde, 1991). The depositional environment for the valley floor is dominantly lake laid deposits of sand, silt and clay. These materials were deposited during two periods of lake activity, one during the Miocene and the other during the Pleistocene. This valley infilling process has been subsequently truncated by down faulting within the valley ranging in height from a few feet to over 50 feet.Younger alluvium has been, and continues to be,transported dominantly by water and deposited on the basins gently sloping valley floor and within low-level flood plains. Portions of the alluvial deposits are being down cut by intermittent streams to the flood plain, and as a result stream terraces are being formed. SITE SOILS Artificial Fill Based on our field studies, some spread fills were observed along the perimeter of the site and on the interior maintenance roadways. This fill is generally associated with the construction of the roadways and irrigation laterals.This spread fill shall be considered artificial fill.The majority of the property has been cultivated for agricultural use,the upper 12 inches of material has been disturbed and consists of sandy silt,with a moderate amount of organics and roots.This shall be considered artificial fill. Deeper fills may be encountered onsite. The "Artificial Fills" are soft and contain organics/roots and are not considered suitable for support of foundations. All artificial fill material should be removed as described in the "Removals" section of this report. Native Alluvial Soils Alluvial soils encountered generally consist of surficial layers of sandy silts, underlain by silty sands and poorly graded gravels with sand and cobbles. The moisture content within the alluvial materials was generally slightly moist to saturated at depth. The consistency of these soils ranged from soft to firm near surface and medium dense to very dense at depth. Weakly cemented layers of soils were encountered in the majority of our excavations, however, we anticipate that the onsite soils can be excavated with conventional earthwork equipment equivalent to CAT D9R dozers and CAT 235 excavators. Although not anticipated, special excavation equipment and techniques may be necessary dependent upon if harder materials are encountered during construction. Much of the property has been cultivated for agricultural use. The upper 12 inches of soil has been disturbed and consists of a brown to dark brown sandy silt containing a moderate amount of organics and roots. Deeper fills may be encountered onsite. The upper 12 inches of soil across the site is loose/soft, contains organics/roots and is not considered suitable for support of foundations. All of these upper soils should be removed as described in the "Removals" section of this report. After the upper 12 inches of soil is removed, the underlying 12 inches of the native alluvium soil will require, at a minimum, some removal and/or processing efforts to be considered suitable for the support of the proposed site improvements. Locally deeper processing/removals may be necessary. GeoTek, Inc. DENNIS CREEK SUBDIVISION AUGUST 26, 2020 HAYDEN HOMES PAGE 4 PROJECT NO. 2149-ID Refer to the "Recommendations Earthwork Construction" section of this report for specific site preparation recommendations. SURFACE & GROUND WATER Ground water was encountered in all of our excavations, ranging from a depth of 4.8 to 5.6 feet below approximate existing grade in TP-4 and TP-I, respectively. Irrigation ditches exist adjacent to the site and they transmit water on a periodic basis. Generally, irrigation ditches and canals will locally influence ground water during the irrigation season (i.e., May through October). If encountered, wet materials should be spread out and air-dried or mixed with drier soils to reduce their moisture content as appropriate for fill placement. Ground water is not anticipated to adversely affect planned development, provided that earthwork construction methods comply with recommendations contained in this report or those made subsequent to review of the improvement plan(s). GTI assumes that the design civil engineer of record will evaluate the site for potential flooding and set grades such that the improvements are adequately protected.These observations reflect conditions at the time of this investigation and do not preclude changes in local ground water conditions in the future from natural causes, damaged structures (lines, pipes etc.), or heavy irrigation. TECTONIC FAULTING AND REGIONAL SEISMICITY The site is situated in an area of active as well as potentially active tectonic faults, however no faults were observed during our field evaluation.There are a number of faults in the regional area,which are considered active and would have an affect on the site in the form of ground shaking, should they be the source of an earthquake. It is reasonable to assume that structures built in this area will be subject to at least one seismic event during their life, therefore, it is recommended that all structures be designed and constructed in accordance with the International Building Code (IBC). Based on our experience in the general vicinity, references in our library, field evaluation of the site, a Seismic Design Site Class Designation of`D' may be used for seismic design. Secondary Seismic Constraints The following list includes other potential seismic related hazards that have been evaluated with respect to the site, but in our opinion, the potential for these seismically related constraints to affect the site is considered negligible. * Liquefaction * Dynamic Settlements * Surface Fault Rupture * Ground Lurching or Shallow Ground Rupture Summary It is important to keep in perspective that if a seismic event were to occur on any major fault, intense ground shaking could be induced to this general area. Potential damage to any settlement sensitive structures would likely be greatest from the vibrations and impelling force caused by the inertia of the structures mass than that created from secondary seismic constraints. Considering the subsurface soil GeoTelc, Inc. DENNIS CREEK SUBDIVISION AUGUST 26, 2020 HAYDEN HOMES PAGE 5 PROJECT NO. 2149-ID conditions and local seismicity, it is estimated that the site has a low risk associated with the potential for these phenomena to occur and adversely affect surface improvements.These potential risks are no greater at this site than they are for other structures and improvements developed on the alluvial materials in this vicinity. RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed on representative samples of the onsite earth materials in order to evaluate their physical and chemical characteristics.The tests performed, and the results obtained are presented in Appendix D. CONCLUSIONS Based on our field exploration, laboratory testing and engineering analyses, it is our opinion that the subject site is suited for development from a geotechnical engineering viewpoint. The recommendations presented herein should be incorporated into the final design, grading, and construction phases of development.The engineering analyses performed concerning site preparation and the recommendations presented below have been completed using the information provided to us regarding site development. In the event that the information concerning proposed development is not correct, the conclusion and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed, and conclusions of this report are modified or approved in writing by this office. RECOMMENDATIONS - EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION General All grading should conform to the International Building Code (IBC) and the requirements of the City of Meridian, except where specifically superseded in the text of this report. During earthwork construction all removals, drain systems, slopes, and the general grading procedures of the contractor should be observed and the fill selectively tested. If unusual or unexpected conditions are exposed in the field, they should be reviewed by this office and, if warranted, modified and/or additional recommendations will be offered. It is recommended that the earthwork contractor(s) perform their own independent reconnaissance of the site to observe field conditions firsthand. If the contractor(s) should have any questions regarding site conditions,site preparation, or the remedial recommendations provided,they should contact an engineer at GeoTek for any necessary clarifications prior to submitting earthwork bids.All applicable requirements of local and national construction and general industry safety orders,the Occupational Safety and Health Act, and the Construction Safety Act should be met. Demolition The following recommendations are provided as guidelines in the event that structures are encountered that are not intended to remain. GeoTek, Inc. DENNIS CREEK SUBDIVISION AUGUST 26, 2020 HAYDEN HOMES PAGE 6 PROJECT NO. 2149-ID 1. All existing surface or subsurface structures (not intended to remain), within the area to be developed, should be razed and moved off site. 2. If a septic tank (to be abandoned or below a proposed improvement) is located within the project site, it is recommended that it be pumped out and, with few exceptions, likely removed. Any leach lines, seepage pits, or other pipes associated with this structure should also be removed or properly abandoned. 3. If any wells are encountered,an attempt should be made to identify the owner and purpose of the well. Well abandonment should adhere to the recommendations provided by the Idaho Department of Water Resources, the Public Health Department, or any other government agencies. If the well is located in the area of a proposed structure, these recommendations should be reviewed by GTI and, if warranted, additional geotechnical recommendations will be offered. Removals/Processing - General Presented below are removal/processing recommendations for the various soils encountered on the project. Debris, vegetation, and other deleterious material should be stripped/removed from areas proposed for structural improvements. Based on a review of the exploratory logs and our site reconnaissance, after the artificial fill and deleterious material are removed (up to 12 inches where observed), a minimum removal/processing depth of 12 inches into alluvial materials should be accomplished across the site. If the left in place soils can be scarified to encounter a competent layer below; they may be processed in place; otherwise, they should be removed to competent material. Locally deeper removals/processing may be necessary based on the field conditions exposed. Since much of has been disturbed, it should be anticipated that deeper fills may be encountered onsite. Beneath the foundations, a minimum of 12 inches of compacted structural fill, meeting the requirements of the Structural Fill and Import Soils section of this report, should be moisture conditioned and compacted to provide a more uniform foundation support. Structural fill should extend a minimum of 12 inches horizontally, from the edge of the footings, for each 12 inches of thickness placed below the footings. A minimum relative compaction of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum modified density (ASTM D 1557) at moisture content of optimum or above is necessary to generate any near surface settlements. Locally deeper removals/processing may be necessary based on the conditions exposed. Removal bottoms should be checked by a representative of GeoTek, Inc. to see if deeper removals are necessary. If very hard cemented materials are encountered during over-excavation, excavation may potentially be terminated, but this will need to be determined on a case by case basis by a representative of GTI. Foundations for the proposed structures may be founded on cemented material; however, in order to avoid the potential for differential settlement, the entire foundation would need to be supported entirely on the cemented material. If this is not possible, cemented materials should be removed to a minimum depth of 12 inches below the bottom of the footing and replaced with compacted structural fill. This can best be determined in the field based upon the conditions exposed. Termination of any GeoTek, Inc. DENNIS CREEK SUBDIVISION AUGUST 26, 2020 HAYDEN HOMES PAGE 7 PROJECT NO. 2149-ID excavation on cemented soils will need to be reviewed by GTI and the owner. If existing improvements or property line restrictions limit removals, condition specific recommendations would be provided on a case-by-case basis. During earthwork construction, care should be taken by the contractor so that adverse ground movements or settlements are not generated affecting existing improvements. Transitional Pads Transitional pads are defined in this report as pads which are partially cut and partially fill.To mitigate some of the differential settlement which will occur on transitional pads,the cut side should be over- excavated/processed to a minimum depth equal to 2 feet below the bottom of the footings or to the depth of the fill,whichever is less. On transitional pads with more than 7.5 feet of fill, plans need to be reviewed by GTI and site-specific recommendations will be provided. Excavation Difficulty We anticipate that the onsite soils can be excavated with conventional earthwork. Seasonal conditions could cause wet soil conditions to occur onsite. Depending on the depth of cuts, it should be expected that special excavation and fill placement measures may be necessary.Wet materials should be spread out and air-dried or mixed with drier soils to reduce their moisture content to the appropriate level for fill placement. Frozen soils, if encountered, should be removed and allowed to thaw prior to any fill placement or construction. Removal bottoms should be checked by a representative of GTI to see if deeper removals are necessary. Fill Placement Subsequent to completing removals/processing and ground preparation, the excavated onsite and/or imported soils may be placed in relatively thin lifts (less than 8 inches thick),cleaned of vegetation and debris, brought to at least optimum moisture content, and compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent of the laboratory standard (ASTM D 1557). Import Material Potentially, soils will be imported to the site for earthwork construction purposes. A sample of any intended import material should first be submitted to GTI so that, if necessary, additional laboratory or chemical testing can be performed to verify that the intended import material is compatible with onsite soils. In general, import material should be within the following minimum guidelines: * Free of organic matter and debris * Maintain less than 0.2 percent sulfate content * Maintain less than 3.0 percent soluble material * Maintain less than 0.02 percent soluble chlorides * Maintain less than 0.2 percent sodium sulfate content * Maintain a Plasticity Index less than 12 (i.e., low expansive) * One hundred percent passing the six-inch screen * At least seventy-five percent passing a three-inch screen * Maintain at least 20 percent on No. 4 screen * Maintain between 5 and 30 percent passing the No. 200 screen GeoTelc, Inc. DENNIS CREEK SUBDIVISION AUGUST 26, 2020 HAYDEN HOMES PAGE 8 PROJECT NO. 2149-ID Observation and Testing During earthwork construction all removal/processing and the general grading procedures should be observed, and the fill selectively tested by a representative(s) of GTI. If unusual or unexpected conditions are exposed in the field,they should be reviewed by GTI and if warranted, modified and/or additional recommendations will be offered. Ground Water Ground water was encountered in all of our excavations, ranging from a depth of 4.8 to 5.6 feet below approximate existing grade in TP-4 and TP-I, respectively. Based on site conditions in the future, a transient high ground water condition could develop over a clay or less permeable layer and this condition could generate down gradient seepage. The possible effect these layers could have on this and adjacent sites should be considered and can best be evaluated in the field during grading. If warranted by exposed field conditions, it may be recommended that a drainage system be established to collect and convey any subsurface water to an appropriate location for drainage.Typically, potential areas of seepage are difficult to identify prior to their occurrence;therefore, it is often best to adopt a "wait and see" approach to determine if any seepage conditions do develop, at which time specific recommendation to mitigate an identified condition can be provided. Earthwork Settlements Ground settlement should be anticipated due to primary consolidation and secondary compression. The total amount of settlement and time over which it occurs is dependent upon various factors, including material type, depth of fill, depth of removals, initial and final moisture content, and in-place density of subsurface materials. Compacted fills,to the heights anticipated,are not generally prone to excessive settlement. However, some settlement of the left-in-place alluvium is expected, and the majority of this settlement is anticipated to occur during grading. RECOMMENDATIONS — FOUNDATIONS General Foundation design and construction recommendations are based on preliminary laboratory testing and engineering analysis performed on near surface soils. The proposed foundation systems should be designed and constructed in accordance with the guidelines contained herein and in the International Building Code. Based on our experience in the area, the soils onsite should have a negligible corrosive potential to concrete and metal, materials selected for construction purposes should be resistant to corrosion. Where permitted by building code, PVC pipe should be utilized. All concrete should be designed, mixed, placed, finished, and cured in accordance with the guidelines presented by the Portland Cement Association (PCA) and the American Concrete Institute (ACI). Based on our grading recommendations,the soils beneath the foundations are anticipated to have low expansion potential. Therefore, foundation recommendations for low expansive soil conditions are provided below. If more expansive soils are encountered, the pad(s) will either need to be regraded and the more expansive soils removed by the contractor—or increased foundation recommendations will need to be provided. GeoTek, Inc. DENNIS CREEK SUBDIVISION AUGUST 26, 2020 HAYDEN HOMES PAGE 9 PROJECT NO. 2149-ID Conventional Foundation Recommendations Column loads are anticipated to be 50 kips or less while wall loads are expected to be 3 kips per linear foot or less.The conventional recommendations provided are from a geotechnical engineering perspective (i.e.,for expansive conditions) and are not meant to supersede the design by the project's structural engineer. Preliminary recommendations for foundation design and construction are presented below. The specific criteria to be used should be verified on evaluation of the proposed buildings,structural loads, and expansion and chemical testing performed after grading is complete. The bearing values indicated are for the total dead, plus frequently applied, live loads and may be increased by one third for short duration loading which includes the effects of wind or seismic forces. When combining passive pressure and friction for lateral resistance,the passive component should be reduced by one-third. A grade beam, reinforced as below and at least 12 inches wide, should be utilized across all large entrances. The base of the grade beam should be at the same elevation as the bottom of the adjacent footings. Footings should be founded at a minimum depth of 24 inches below lowest adjacent ground surface as required by local codes to extend below the frost line. Reinforcement for spread footings should be designed by the project's structural engineer. For foundations systems including a crawl space, it is recommended that it be designed so that water is not allowed to penetrate the crawl space. Proper grading and backfill for the foundations are critical and should adhere to the"fill placement"and "drainage"recommendations of this evaluation as well as local building codes. Soil Minimum Allowable Passive Maximum Footing Expansion Footing Bearing Coefficient Earth Earth Type Depth Pressure of Friction Pressure Pressure Classification (inches) s sf/ft s �i ) LP � LP ) LP f) Strip/Spread Low 24 2,000 0.35 250 3,000 The coefficient of friction and passive earth pressure values recommended are working values. Strip footings should have a minimum width of one foot and spread footings should have a minimum soil to concrete area of four-square feet. Increases are allowed for the bearing capacity of the footings at a rate of 250 pounds per square foot for each additional foot of width and 250 pounds per square foot for each additional foot of depth into the recommended bearing material, up to a maximum outlined. If the bearing value exceeds 3,000 psf, an additional review by GTI is recommended. As mentioned earlier,the exposed ground surface should be moisture conditioned and compacted a minimum depth of 12 inches below bottom of footings. Foundation Settlement Provided that the recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into final design and construction phase of development, total settlement is estimated to be less than one inch and differential settlement is estimated to be less than 0.75 inches for a 25-foot span. Two-way angular GeoTelc, Inc. DENNIS CREEK SUBDIVISION AUGUST 26, 2020 HAYDEN HOMES PAGE 10 PROJECT NO. 2149-ID distortions due to settlements are not estimated to exceed 1/400. The structures should be loaded uniformly so as to avoid any localized settlements. PAVEMENT SECTIONS Pavement sections presented in the following table are based on an R-value result of 38, Ada County Highway District Development(ACHD) pre-assigned traffic index(s)for residential construction and estimated traffic index(s) for commercial construction, and the guidelines presented in the latest edition of the ACHD Development Policy Manual. These pavement sections are presented for planning purposes only and should be verified based on specific laboratory testing performed subsequent to rough grading of the site. Pavement Construction and Maintenance All section changes should be properly transitioned. If adverse conditions are encountered during the preparation of subgrade materials, special construction methods may need to be employed. All subgrade materials should be processed to a minimum depth of 12 inches and compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent near optimum moisture content. All aggregate base should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent at optimum moisture content. The recommended pavement sections provided are meant as minimums. If thinner or highly variable pavement sections are constructed, increased maintenance and repair should be expected. If the ADT (average daily traffic) or ADTT (average daily truck traffic) increases beyond that intended,as reflected by the traffic index(s) used for design, increased maintenance and repair could be required for the pavement section. Positive site drainage should be maintained at all times.Water should not be allowed to pond or seep into the ground. If planters or landscaping are adjacent to paved areas, measures should be taken to minimize the potential for water to enter the pavement section. MINIMUM MINIMUM AGGREGATE ASSUMED TRAFFIC SUBGRADE ASPHALT THICKNESS (in.) CONCRETE Aggregate RIGHT-OF-AWAY R-VALUE A re ate Subbase THICKNESS Base (3/4" (Uncrushed (in.) minus)* Aggregate)* Residential Normal Traffic 38 2.5 4.0 5.0 TI = 6.0 Collector Normal Traffic 38 3.0 6.0 7.0 TI = 8.0 *Aggregate Base and Subbase gradation specification requirement per the current edition of the Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC) Manual.Asphalt mix design shall meet the requirements of ISPWC, Section 810 Class III Plant mix. Materials shall be placed in accordance with ISPWC Standard Specifications for Highway Construction. GeoTek, Inc. DENNIS CREEK SUBDIVISION AUGUST 26, 2020 HAYDEN HOMES PAGE I I PROJECT NO. 2149-ID OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS Site Improvements As is commonly known, expansive soils are problematic with respect to the design, construction and long-term performance of concrete flatwork. Due to the nature of concrete flatwork, it is essentially impossible to totally mitigate the effects of soil expansion.Typical measures to control soil expansion for structures include; low expansive soil caps, deepened foundation system, increased structural design,and soil presaturation.As they are generally not cost effective,these measures are very seldom utilized for flatwork because it's less costly to simply replace any damaged or distressed sections than to "structurally" design them. Even if "structural" design parameters are applied to flatwork construction,there would still be relative movements between adjoining types of structures and other improvements (e.g., curb and sidewalk). This is particularly true as the level of care during construction of flatwork is often not as meticulous as that for structures. Unfortunately, it is fairly common practice for flatwork to be poured on subgrade soils, which have been allowed to dry out since site grading. Generally, after flatwork construction is completed, landscape irrigation begins, utility lines are pressurized, and drainage systems are utilized; presenting the potential for water to enter the dry subgrade soils, causing the soil to expand. Recommendations for exterior concrete flatwork design and construction can be provided upon request. If, in the future, any additional improvements are planned for the site, recommendations concerning the geological or geotechnical aspects of design and construction of said improvements could be provided upon request.This office should be notified in advance of any fill placement,grading, or trench backfilling after rough grading has been completed. This includes any grading, utility trench and retaining wall backfills. Landscape Maintenance and Planting Water has been shown to weaken the inherent strength of all earth materials. Slope stability is significantly reduced by overly wet conditions. Graded slopes constructed within and utilizing onsite materials would be erosive. Eroded debris may be minimized, and surficial slope stability enhanced by establishing and maintaining a suitable vegetation cover as soon as possible after construction. Compaction to the face of fill slopes would tend to minimize short-term erosion until vegetation is established. Plants selected for landscaping should be lightweight, deep-rooted types, which require little water and are capable of surviving the prevailing climate. From a geotechnical standpoint leaching is not recommended for establishing landscaping. If the surface soils are processed for the purpose of adding amendments, they should be recompacted to 90 percent compaction. Only the amount of irrigation necessary to sustain plant life should be provided. Over watering the landscape areas could adversely affect proposed site improvements. We recommend that any proposed open bottom planter areas adjacent to proposed structures, be eliminated for a minimum distance of 5 feet and desert landscape using xeriscape technology be used outside of this buffer zone. As an alternative, closed bottom type planter could be utilized. An outlet, placed in the bottom of the planter, could be installed to direct drainage away from structures or any exterior concrete flatwork. Irrigation timers should be adjusted on a monthly basis. Soil Corrosion Based on our experience in the area, the soils onsite should have a negligible corrosive potential to concrete and metal, materials selected for construction purposes should be resistant to corrosion. GeoTek, Inc. DENNIS CREEK SUBDIVISION AUGUST 26, 2020 HAYDEN HOMES PAGE 12 PROJECT NO. 2149-ID Where permitted by building code, PVC pipe should be utilized. All concrete should be designed, mixed, placed, finished, and cured in accordance with the guidelines presented by the Portland Cement Association (PCA) and the American Concrete Institute (ACI). Trench Excavation All footing trench excavations should be observed by a representative of this office prior to placing reinforcement. Footing trench spoil and any excess soils generated from utility trench excavations should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent if not removed from the site. Considering the nature of the onsite soils, it should be anticipated that caving or sloughing could be a factor in excavations. Shoring or excavating the trench walls and slopes to the angle of repose (typically 25 to 45 degrees) may be necessary and should be anticipated in non-cemented soils. All excavations should be observed by one of our representatives and conform to national and local safety codes. Onsite Utility Trench Backfill Considering the overall nature of the soil encountered onsite, it should be anticipated that materials will need to be imported to the site for use as pipe bedding and pipe zone material. All utility trench backfill should be brought to near optimum moisture content and then compacted to obtain a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent of the laboratory standard. Compaction testing and observation, along with probing should be performed to verify the desired results.Sand backfill, unless excavated from the trench, should not be used adjacent to perimeter footings or in trenches on slopes. Compaction testing and observation, along with probing should be performed to verify the desired results. Sand backfill, unless excavated from the trench, should not be used adjacent to perimeter footings or in trenches on slopes. Compaction testing and observation, along with probing should be performed to verify the desired results. Offsite utility trenches should be compacted to a minimum of 90 relative compaction. Compaction testing and observation, along with probing should be performed to verify the desired results. Drainage Positive site drainage should be maintained at all times in accordance with the IBC. Drainage should not flow uncontrolled down any descending slope.Water should be directed away from foundations and not allowed to pond and/or seep into the ground. Pad drainage should be directed toward the street or other approved area. The ground immediately adjacent to the foundation shall be sloped away from the building at a minimum of 5-percent for a minimum distance of 10 feet measured perpendicularly to the face of the wall. If physical obstructions prohibit 10 feet of horizontal distance,a 5-percent slope shall be provided to an approved alternate method of diverting water away from the foundation. Swales used for this purpose shall be sloped a minimum of 2-percent where located within 10 feet of the building foundation. Impervious surfaces within 10 feet of the building foundation shall be sloped a minimum of 2-percent away from the building. Roof gutters and down spouts should be utilized to control roof drainage. Down spouts should outlet onto paved areas or a minimum of five feet from proposed structures or into a subsurface drainage system. Areas of seepage may develop due to irrigation or heavy rainfall. Minimizing irrigation will lessen this potential. If areas of seepage develop, recommendations for minimizing this effect could be provided upon request. GeoTek, Inc. DENNIS CREEK SUBDIVISION AUGUST 26, 2020 HAYDEN HOMES PAGE 13 PROJECT NO. 2149-ID PLAN REVIEW Final grading, foundation, and improvement plans should be submitted to this office for review and comment as they become available, to minimize any misunderstandings between the plans and recommendations presented herein. In addition,foundation excavations and earthwork construction performed on the site should be observed and tested by this office. If conditions are found to differ substantially from those stated, appropriate recommendations would be offered at that time. LIMITATIONS The materials encountered on the project site and utilized in our laboratory study are believed representative of the area; however, soil materials vary in character between excavations and conditions exposed during mass grading. Site conditions may vary due to seasonal changes or other factors. GeoTek, Inc. assumes no responsibility or liability for work, testing, or recommendations performed or provided by others.Since our study is based upon the site materials observed,selective laboratory testing and engineering analysis, the conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions.These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice and no warranty is expressed or implied. Standards of practice are subject to change with time. The opportunity to be of service is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this report or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, GeoTek, Inc. �SS\ONAI FNG EN SF� �7i� lGkTF O F �J. WO Steven J. Huber, El Luke J. Landriani, PE Staff Professional Senior Engineer GeoTek, Inc. rr Msvninan reo t r rani uon ma C F s — c+. - M CL Sel I1 ers mark H E I W*sift*Rd E Usgrk Rd � a z u a :0 PU a MJeri d l a p Middle School-' C Fairviffi+AV-0 T APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION JIV Source:Google Maps, 2020. GeoTek Field Observations, 2020. Not to Scale FIGURE I SITEVICINITY MAP Dennis Creek Subdivision NE of W Ustick Rd & N Linder Road G E O T E K Meridian, Idaho GEOTECHNICAL I ENVIRONMENTAL I MATERIALS Prepared for: Hayden Homes Project No.: Report Date: Drawn By: 320 E.Corporate Dr,Suite 300, Meridian,ID 83642 2149-ID July 2020 SJH (208)888-7010 (phone)/(208)888-7924(FAX) 7 e� A I f _ K I V' •1 :_ - J ;F121 ZII 11111, . i ' 'I I�- Iy ■ �•.'l i 1• kvl� 7. 1fi I' IfTT1 % . W Ustick Rd APPROXIMATETEST PIT LOCATIONS Source:Google Earth 2018, GeoTek Field Observations, 2020. Not to Scale FIGURE 2 SITE EXPLORATION PLAN Dennis Creek Subdivision NE of W Ustick Rd & N Linder Rd G E O T E K Meridian, Idaho GEOTECHNICAL I ENVIRONMENTAL I MATERIALS Prepared for: Hayden Homes Project No.: Report Date: Drawn By: 320 E.Corporate Dr,Suite 300, Meridian,ID 83642 2149-ID July 2020 Si (208)888-7010 (phone)/(208)888-7924(FAX) APPENDIX A GeoTek, Inc. REFERENCES Ada County Highway District Development Policy Manual, Revised by Resolution No. 690, October 2003 ASTM, 200, "Soil and Rock: American Society for Testing and Materials," vol. 4.08 for ASTM test methods D-420 to D-4914, 153 standards, 1,026 pages; and vol. 4.09 for ASTM test method D- 4943 to highest number. Breckinridge, R.M., Lewis, R.S.,Adema, G.W.,Weisz, D.W., 2003, Map of Miocene and Younger Faults in Idaho, Idaho Geological Survey, University of Idaho Collett, Russell A., 1980, Soil Survey of Ada County, Eastern Part, United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conversation Service, United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, Idaho Soil Conservation Commission, University of Idaho College of Agriculture. Day, Robert W., 1999, Geotechnical and Foundation Engineering— Design and Construction Day, Robert W., 2002, Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering Handbook GeoTek, Inc., In-house proprietary information. Idaho Department of Water Resources, Treasure Valley Hydrology— Geology,January 2003 Idaho Department of Water Resources, Well Information, Well Driller Reports, 2002 Idaho Transportation Department CD-ROM Publications, September 2003 Johnson, Bruce R. and Raines, Gary L., 1995, Digital representation of the Idaho state geologic map: a contribution to the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project. USGS Open-File Report 95-690 Malde, H.E., 1991. Quaternary geology and structural history of the Snake River Plain, Idaho and Oregon. In: The Geology of North America, Quaternary Nonglacial Geology: Conterminous U.S., Vol. K-2, 252-281 pp. Othberg, K.L., 1994. Geology and geomorphology of the Boise Valley and adjoining areas, western Snake River Plain, Idaho. Idaho Geological Survey Bulletin 29: 54 pp. USGS, Cloverdale Quadrangle, 7.5-Minute Series Topographic Map, 1979. USGS, 2003, Seismic Hazard Map of Idaho, Peak Acceleration (%g)with 2% Probability of Exceedance in 50 years. GeoTek, Inc. APPENDIX 6 GeoTek, Inc. LOG GENERAL NOTES CONSISTENCY OF FINE-GRAINED SOILS RELATIVE DENSITY OF COARSE-GRAINED SOILS Unconfined Standard Standard Penetration(SPT)or N. Compressive Penetration or N- Consistency Relative Density Strength,Qu,psf Value(SS)Blows/Ft Value(SS)Blows/Ft <500 <2 Very Soft 0-3 Very Loose Soo- 1,000 2-3 Soft 4-9 Loose 1,001 -2,000 4-7 Firm 10-29 Medium Dense 2,001 -4,000 8- 16 Stiff 30-49 Dense 4,001 -8,000 17-32 Very Stiff 50+ Very Dense >8,001 32+ Hard SPT penetration test using 140 pound hammer,with 30 inch free fall on 2 inch outside diameter(I-3/8 ID)sampler For ring sampler using 140 lb hammer,with a 30 inch free fall on 3 inch outside diameter(2-1/2 ID)sample, use N-value x 0.7 to get Standard N-value For fine grained soil consistency,thumb penetration used per ASTM D-2488 RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF SAND&GRAVEL GRAIN SIZE TERMINOLOGY Descriptive Term of other constituents Percent of Dry Major Component Particle Size Weight of Sample Trace < 15 Boulders Over 12 inches With 15-29 Cobbles 3 inches to 12 inches Modifier >30 Gravel #4 Sieve to 3 inches Sand #200 Sieve to#4 Sieve Silt or Clay Passing#200 Sieve RELATIVE HARDNESS OF CEMENTED SOILS(CALICHE) Description General Characteristics Very Dense to Moderately Hard Partially Cemented Granular Soil-Can be carved with a knife and broken with force by hand. Very Stiff to Moderately Hard Partially Cemented Fine-Grained Soil-Can be carved with a knife and broken with force by hand. Moderately Hard Moderate hammer blow required to break a sample Hard Heavy hammer blow required to break a sample Very Hard Repeated heavy hammer blow required to break a sample LOG LEGEND MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Soil Pattern USCS Symbol USCS Classification FILL Artificial Fill GP or GW Poorly/Well graded GRAVEL GM Silty GRAVEL GC Clayey GRAVEL GP-GM or GW-GM Poorly/Well graded GRAVEL with Silt GP-GC or GW-GC Poorly/Well graded GRAVEL with Clay SP or SW Poorly/Well graded SAND SM Silty SAND SC Clayey SAND SP-SM or SW-SM Poorly/Well graded SAND with Silt SP-SC or SW-SC Poorly/Well graded SAND with Clay SC-SM Silty Clayey SAND IIII! !I ! ! !!I ML SILT MH Elastic SILT CL-ML Silty CLAY CL Lean CLAY CH Fat CLAY PCEM PARTIALLY CEMENTED CEM CEMENTED BDR BEDROCK SAMPLING SPT Ring Sample NR No Recovery Bulk Sample Water Table CONSISTENCY Cohesionless Soils Cohesive Soils Cementation VL Very Loose So Soft MH Moderately Hard L Loose F Firm H Hard MD Medium Dense S Stiff VH Very Hard D Dense VS Very Stiff VD Very Dense TEST PIT LOG LOGGED BY: SJH PROJECT#: 2149-ID METHOD: Backhoe "0.00GI144-1 PROJECT: Dennis Creek Subdivision EXCAVATOR: Just Dig It CLIENT: Hayden Homes DATE: 7/2/20 GE O T E K LOCATION: NE of N Linder Rd&W Ustick Rd Intersection ELEVATION: SAMPLES O .. c L E u s TEST PIT NUMBER: TP-I 4 REMARKS o to o in m MATERIAL DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS ML Brown to Dk.Brown,Sandy SILT,Moist So Organics1roots upper 1.0 I F 2 SM Tan to Lt.Brown,Silty SAND,Slightly Moist to Moist MD Weak cementation throughout 3 mx 4 GP Tan to Lt.Brown,Poorly graded GRAVEL w/Sand&Cobbles,Moist to Saturated D Percolation testing conducted @ 4.0'on 7-7-20 5 Ground water measured @ 5.6'on 7-7-20 6 7 8 Piezometer installed @ 8.0' END OF TEST PIT @ 8.0- 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TEST PIT LOG LOGGED BY: SJH PROJECT#: 2149-ID METHOD: Backhoe PROJECT: Dennis Creek Subdivision EXCAVATOR: Just Dig It CLIENT: Hayden Homes DATE: 7/2/20 GE 0 T E K LOCATION: NE of N Linder Rd&W Ustick Rd Intersection ELEVATION: SAMPLES 0E c TEST PIT NUMBER: TP-2 0 REMARKS a a H CL v� U1 C E o uVi rn ca H O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS V ML grown,Sandy SILT,Moist So rganics roots upper 1.0. I SM Lt.Brown to Brown,Silty SAND,Slightly Moist to Moist MD Weak cementation throughout 2 Percolation testing conducted @ 2.0'on 7-7-20 —x 3 GP Tan to Lt Brown,Poorly graded GRAVEL w/Sand&Cobbles,Moist to Saturated D 4 5 Ground water measured @ 5.4'on 7-7-20 6 7 8 Piezometer installed @ 8.0' END OF TEST PIT @ 8.0' 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TEST PIT LOG LOGGED BY: S,H PROJECT#: 2149-ID METHOD: Backhoe PROJECT: Dennis Creek Subdivision EXCAVATOR: Just Dig It CLIENT: Hayden Homes DATE: 7/2/20 GE 0 T E K LOCATION: NE of N Linder Rd&W Ustick Rd Intersection ELEVATION: SAMPLES E L. .0 C TEST PIT NUMBER: TP-3 N N d FA U REMARKS C b o � (A V H ao 7 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS ML Brown,Sandy SILT,Moist So _rganic�,roots upper l!. I F 2 SM Lt.Brown to Brown,Silty SAND,Slightly Moist to Moist MD 3 4 DOOM GP Brown to Reddish Brown,Poorly graded GRAVEL w/Sand&Cobbles,Moist to Saturated D 5 Ground water seepage noted @ 5.5' 6 7 8 END OF TEST PIT @ 8.0' 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TEST PIT LOG LOGGED BY: SJH PROJECT M 2149-ID METHOD: Backhoe PROJECT: Dennis Creek Subdivision EXCAVATOR: Just Dig It CLIENT: Hayden Homes DATE: 7/2/20 GE D T E K LOCATION: NE of N Linder Rd&W Ustick Rd Intersection ELEVATION: SAMPLES _ O v C y s N TEST PIT NUMBER: TP-4 REMARKS G (d o (o VV) j inm MATERIAL DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS ML Brown,Sandy SILT,Moist So Organics/roots upper i. 1 SM Tan to Lt.Brown,Silty SAND w/Gravel,Slightly Moist to Moist MD Weak cementation throughout 2 Percolation testing conducted @ 2.5'on 7-7-20 3 4 GP Brown to Reddish Brown,Poorly graded GRAVEL w/Sand&Cobbles,Moist to Saturated D 5 Ground water measured @ 4.8'on 7-7-20 6 7 Piezometer installed @ 7.0' END OF TEST PIT @ 7.0' 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 —Q 201 TEST PIT LOG LOGGED BY: SJH AS:Co"., PROJECT#: 2149-ID METHOD: Backhoe PROJECT: Dennis Creek Subdivision EXCAVATOR: Just Dig It CLIENT: Hayden Homes DATE: 7/2120 GE Q T E K LOCATION: NE of N Linder Rd&W Ustick Rd Intersection ELEVATION: SAMPLES E u TEST PIT NUMBER: TP-5 N a °' H d v► REMARKS G kv o US W)i U W m MATERIAL DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS ML �Brown to Dk.Brown,Sandy SILT,Moist So rganics+roots upper n' I F 2 SM Lt.Brown to Brown,Silty SAND,Slightly Moist to Moist MD 3 Percolation testing conducted @ 3.0'on 7-7-20 4 GP Brown to Reddish Brown,Poorly graded GRAVEL w/Sand&Cobbles,Moist to Saturated D 5 Ground water measured @ 4.9'on 7-7-20 6 7 8 9 VD 9 Piezometer installed @ 10.0' 10— END OF TEST PIT @ 10.0- II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 APPENDIX C GeoTek, Inc. FIELD TESTS AND OBSERVATIONS (2149-ID) PERCOLATION TESTS The infiltration rate was determined by conducting percolation tests for onsite earth materials.The infiltration rate was determined in inches per hour in general accordance with the City of Meridian requirements. Infiltration rate results are presented below.The infiltration rates provided below should be used for design and not exceeded. USCS Soil INFILTRATION RATE LOCATION Classification (Inches/Hour) Symbol TP-I @4.0' GP 12.5 TP-2 @ 2.0' SM 5.8 TP-4 @ 2.5' SM 6.5 TP-5 @ 3.0' SM 5.5 GROUND WATER MONITORING RESULTS Ground water monitoring results are presented below. Ground water elevation results are recorded in feet below existing grade. STAND-PIPE TP-I TP-2 TP-4 TP-5 PIEZOMETER # 7-7-20 5.6 5.4 4.8 4.9 Indicates a dry reading at the bottom of the piezometer "n/a" Indicates that the piezometer was damaged/missing in the field and no measurements were obtained. GeoTek, Inc. APPENDIX D GeoTek, Inc. LABORATORY TESTS RESULTS (2149-ID) ATTERBERG LIMITS Atterberg limits were performed on representative samples in general accordance with ASTM D 4318. The results are shown in the following plates. PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS Sieve analyses were performed in general accordance with ASTM test method C 136 and ASTM C 117. Test results are presented in the following plates. RESISTANCE R-VALUE AND EXPANSION PRESSURE OF COMPACTED SOILS Tests were conducted on representative soil samples, in general accordance with Idaho test method T-8 and AASHTO T-190, to determine the soil's performance when placed in the base, subbase, or subgrade of a road subjected to traffic. LOCATION R-VALUE @ 200 psi TP-I @ 2.0'-3.0' 38 GeoTek, Inc. GeoTek-Idaho 320 Corporate Drive,Ste#300 7950 Meadowlark Way, Ste E Meridian, ID 83642 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83815 Phone: (208)888-7010 (208)888-7924 Fax: (208)904-2980 (208)904-2981 Report No: MAT:20-02845-S02 Material Test Report Client: Hayden Homes CC: 2464 SW Glacier Place Redmond OR 97756 Project: 2149-ID Dennis Creek Subdivision THIS DOCUMENT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL Sample Details Sample Description: ' Sample ID 20-02845-S02 SM, Silty SAND w/Gravel Date Sampled 7/2/2020 Specification General Sieve Set Sampled By Steven Huber Location TP-4, 1.0'-2.0' Atterberg Liquid Limit: N/A Plastic Limit: NP Plasticity Index: NP Particle Size Distribution Grading: ASTM C 136,ASTM C 117MM Date Tested: Tested By: %classing Sieve Size % Passing Limits so ..--..--.... ............ 2in 100 13/4in 100 av -- --- - tin 100 3/in 100 70 ...................................... ..................... '/2in 93 3/8in 89 60 ............................................ No.4 82 so N o.8 76 No.16 69 40 .-....-.. No.30 59 N o.50 48 .......... .... ..... No.100 38 No.200 27 ............... .......... �o ............. ............................................... 0 m � d i i v o a z x � Z 2 Sieve COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES(26.8%) D85: 6.3930 D60: 0.6420 D50: 0.3403 Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt ClayD30: 0.0906 D15: N/A D10: N/A (0.0%) (0.0%) (17.5%) (8.5%) (20.3%) (26.9%) Form No:18909,Report No:MAT:20-02845-S02 ©2000-2020 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com Page 1 of 2 GeoTek-Idaho 320 Corporate Drive,Ste#300 7950 Meadowlark Way, Ste E Meridian, ID 83642 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83815 Phone: (208)888-7010 (208)888-7924 Fax: (208)904-2980 (208)904-2981 Report No: MAT:20-02845-S03 Material Test Report Client: Hayden Homes CC: 2464 SW Glacier Place Redmond OR 97756 Project: 2149-ID Dennis Creek Subdivision THIS DOCUMENT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL Sample Details Sample Description: ' Sample ID 20-02845-S03 ML, Sandy SILT Date Sampled 7/2/2020 Specification General Sieve Set Sampled By Steven Huber Location TP-5, 0.0'-1.0' Atterberg - Liquid Limit: 34 Plastic Limit: 25 Plasticity Index: 9 Particle Size Distribution Grading: ASTM C 136,ASTM C 117MM Date Tested: Tested By: messing Sieve Size % Passing Limits go .............................. ........................ 2in 100 13/4in 100 80 ........................................ ......... 1in 100 3/in 100 70 .............................................................. '/zin 100 60,......................................................—........... .... 3/8in 100 N o.4 100 50 N o.8 99 No.16 94 a0 ......... ........................................ No.30 87 N o.50 79 N o.100 71 No.200 58 20 .............---.................... .......... 10 ......................... ..................,,.......... 0 _ a c r i Z v d a z x � z i Sieve COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES(57.9%) D85: 0.5045 D60: 0.0834 D50: N/A Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt ClayD30: N/A D15: N/A D10: N/A (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.3%) (2.1%) (14.7%) (25.0%) Form No:18909,Report No:MAT:20-02845-S03 ©2000-2020 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com Page 1 of 2 { T" •55-N it I } C �Iy t L I � J J Z I W stick Rd APPROXIMATE TEST PIT LOCATIONS Source:Google Earth 2018, GeoTek Field Observations, 2020. Not to Scale FIGURE 2 SITE EXPLORATION PLAN Dennis Creek Subdivision NE of W Ustick Rd & N Linder Rd G G 0 T E K Meridian, Idaho GEOTECHNICAL j ENVIRONMENTAL j MATERIALS Prepared for: Ha den Homes Project No.: Report Date: Drawn By: 320 E.Corporate Dr,Suite 300, Meridian,ID 83642 2149-ID September 2020 SJH (208)888-7010(phone)/(208)888-7924(FAX) 11 2149-ID Dennis Creek Subdivision Date TP-I TP-2 TP-4 TP-5 Notes KEY 7/7/2020 5.6' 5A 4.8' 4.9' "+" Indicates dry reading at bottom of 7/24/2020 6.0' 5.8' 5A 6.0' piezometer 8/7/2020 6.5' 6.3' 5.1' 6.0' 8/2 I/2020 6.8' 6.4' 5.3' 6.2' "N/A" Indicates that piezometer is damaged or missing-therefore no data was 9/4/2020 6.9' 6.4' S.5' 6.6' obtained 9/28/2020 6.0' 5.9' 5.0' 5.9' Note: Groundwater elevation results are recorded in feet below approximate existing grade. Generally, irrigation ditches and canals will locally influence ground water during the irrigation season. Planning Division E IDIANI-----.*' HEARING APPLICATION C�wl I- D A R L H 0 1 Type of Review Requested Hearing Filenumber: H-2020-0112 Assigned Planner: Related Files: Applicant Information Applicantname: HAYDEN HOMES IDAHO, LLC Phone: 208-501-8099 Applicant address: 1406 N. MAIN STREET, STE. 114, MERIDIAN, ID83642 Email: mgregory@hayden-homes.com Ownername: DENNIS CREEK Phone: Fax: 770 E. CLEAR CREEK DR., MERIDIAN, ID tmokwa@hayden-homes.com Owner address: 83646 Email: Agent name(e.g.architect,engineer,developer,representative): ROSS ERICKSON Firmname- ERICKSON CIVIL INC Phone: 2088673954 Fax: Address: 6213 N CLOVERDALE ROAD SUITE 125 Email: rOss@ericksoncivil.com Contactname: HAYDEN HOMES IDAHO, LLC Phone: 208-501-8099 Fa,: Contact address: 1406 N. MAIN STREET, STE. 114 Email: mgregory@hayden-homes.com Subject Property Information Location/street address: Assessor's parcel number(s): S0436336156 Township,range,section: 4N1W36 Project Description Project/Application Name: Tetherow Crossing Subdivision -AZ, PP Description of Work: See Attached Project Narrative. 33 E Broadway Avenue,Suite 102 Meridian,Idaho 83642 Phone:(208)884-5533 e Facsimile:(208)888-6854 e Website:www.meridaincity.org I Application Information APPLICATION TYPES Annexation and Zoning-AZ: CHECKED AZ-Staff Prepared Consensual: No Preliminary Plat-PP: CHECKED ADDRESS VERIFICATION Address Verification Permit Number: LDAV-2020-0676 TYPE OF USE PROPOSED Residential: CHECKED Single-Family Detached: CHECKED PROPERTY INFORMATION General Location: Linder& Ustick Current Land Use: RUT Total Acreage: 7.58 Traffic Study Required per ACHD: No ZONING DISTRICT(S) R-8: CHECKED FLUM DESIGNATION(S) Medium Density Residential: CHECKED Acreage-Medium Density Res: 7.58 PROJECT INFORMATION Elevations Date(MM/DD/YYYY): N/A Percentage of Site Devoted to Building: N/A Percentage of Site Devoted to Landscaping: N/A Percentage of Site Devoted to Paving: N/A Who will own and Maintain the Pressurized Irrigation System in this Development: HOA Irrigation District: NMID Primary Irrigation Source: SURFACE WATER Secondary Irrigation Source: WELL Square Footage of Landscaped Areas to be Irrigated by City Water Connection: 0 Minimum Square Footage of Ground Floor Area for Multi-Story Units: N/A Proposed Building Height: R-8 Existing Floor Area(If Applicable): N/A Gross Floor Area Proposed: N/A Hours of Operation(Days and Hours): N/A Number of Standard Parking Spaces Provided: N/A Number of Compact Parking Spaces Provided: N/A Number of Residential Units: 46 Minimum Square Footage of Living Area(Excluding Garage): N/A 33 E Broadway Avenue,Suite 102 * Meridian,Idaho 83642 Phone:(208)884-5533 e Facsimile:(208)888-6854 e Website:www.meridaincity.org 3 Gross Density: 6.07 Net Density: 10.28 What was the date of your pre-application meeting?: 10/06/2020 What was the date of your neighborhood meeting?: 10/15/2020 In Reclaimed Water Buffer: No PROPERTY POSTING I agree to comply with the Commitment of Property Posting regulations per UDC 11- CHECKED 5A-6D: AZ/RZ ONLY R-8: CHECKED Acreage-R-8: 7.58 PLATS ONLY Number of Building Lots: 46 Number of Common Lots: 8 Total Number of Lots: 54 Minimum Lot Size: 4000 �AAverage Lot Size: 4236 v rea of Plat: 7.58 Plat Date(MM/DD/YYYY): 10/16/2020 QUALIFYING OPEN SPACE Open Grassy Area(min.50'x 100'): CHECKED Other Qualified Open Space: Tot Lot, Benches/Sitting Area, Pet Station Acres of Qualified Open Space: 44428 Percentage of Qualified Open Space: 13.46 QUALIFYING SITE AMENITIES Other Qualified Site Amenities: Tot Lot, Benches/Sitting Area, Pet Station TIME EXTENSION INFORMATION Number of months extension: 24 APPLICATION DISCLAIMER I have read and accept the above terms: CHECKED Your signature: Ross Erickson MISC Is new record: No 33 E Broadway Avenue,Suite 102 Meridian,Idaho 83642 Phone:(208)884-5533 e Facsimile:(208)888-6854 e Website:www.meridaincity.org 5