Loading...
PZ - Staff Report 11-19 STAFF REPORT C� w COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING November 19,2020 Legend DATE: ' ��Project Lacfl�ian TO: Planning&Zoning Commission 1�T� FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 L SUBJECT: H-2020-0097 2810 E. Franklin Rd.—AZ ` LOCATION: 2810 E. Franklin Rd., in the SE 1/4 of CPO Section 8,Township 3N.,Range 1E. (Parcel#S 1108449000) -- ---- � r I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant requests annexation of 1.01 acres of land with a C-G zoning district. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 0.92 of an acre(1.01 including adjacent right-of-way to the centerline of E.Franklin Rd.) Future Land Use Designation Commercial Existing Land Use Single-family residential Proposed Land Use(s) Flex space Current Zoning RUT in Ada County Proposed Zoning Commercial(General Retail and Service Commercial) Waterways The Snider Lateral crosses the northern portion of this site. Neighborhood meeting date;#of September 2,2020;3 attendees attendees: History(previous approvals) None Pagel B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Yes • Requires ACHD Commission No Action(yes/no) Access(Arterial/Collectors/State One(1)existing access via E.Franklin Rd.,an arterial street Hwy/Local)(Existing and Proposed) and entryway corridor,proposed to remain Fire Service No comments were submitted. Police Service No comments were submitted. Wastewater Distance to Sewer Services Directly adjacent in Franklin Rd. Sewer Shed Five Mile Trunk Estimated Project Sewer ERU's See application WRRF Declining Balance 13.98 Project Consistent with WW Yes Master Plan/Facility Plan Impacts/Concerns No comment Water Distance to Water Services Directly adjacent in Franklin Rd. Pressure Zone 3 Estimated Project Water ERU's See application Water Quality None Project Consistent with Water Yes Master Plan Impacts/Concerns No comment C. Project Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map let legend Project Lcou-non ProjEct Limbs s i■ rs j IU :. j- aim 0M I a Pagc 2 Zoning Map Planned Development Map (fLegend 0 (fLegend Project Lflcaiion I Project Lacafian »r� +City Linyk — Planned Parcels I I { I I I I 1 III______IILJJJ I I I I I 1 I 1 1 L- -- ---- R.-4 RU r PC V - ----- III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Stephanie Leonard,KM Engineering—9233 W. State St., Boise,ID 83714 B. Owner: Daniel Eisenring— 194 W. Broderick Dr.,Meridian, ID 83646 C. Representative: Same as Applicant IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper notification published in newspaper 10/30/2020 Radius notification mailed to property owners within 300 feet 10/30/2020 Public hearing notice sign posted 11/5/2020 on site Nextdoor posting 10/30/2020 V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS LAND USE: This property is designated as Commercial on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM)in the Comprehensive Plan. The Commercial designation provides for a full range of commercial uses to serve area residents and visitors. Desired uses may include retail,restaurants,personal and professional services,and office uses, as well as appropriate public and quasi-public uses. Multi-family residential may be allowed in Page 3 some cases but should be careful to promote a high quality of life through thoughtful site design, connectivity and amenities. The Applicant proposes to redevelop this site for a flex space use that will consist of office and warehouse space for an automotive tool and equipment supplier. Goals,Objectives, &Action Items: Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this application and apply to the proposed use of this property(staff analysis in italics): • "Encourage infill development."(3.03.01E) The Comprehensive Plan defines infill as "development on vacant parcels, or redevelopment of existing parcels to a higher and better use that is surrounded by developed property within the City of Meridian."The subject property abuts City annexed land to the north, east and south and is proposed to redevelop with a commercial use. • "Focus development and redevelopment intensity on key transportation corridors." (3.07.02C) The subject property and proposed flex space use is located adjacent to E. Franklin Rd., a key transportation corridor and entryway corridor into the City. Redevelopment of this property to a commercial use is an appropriate intensity in this location along a major transportation corridor. • "Encourage compatible uses and site design to minimize conflicts and maximize use of land." (3.07.00) The property to the north is zoned industrial(I-L); the property to the northwest is developed with a landscape supply business and the property directly to the north is undeveloped. The property to the east is vacant/undeveloped land zoned C-G. The office proposed in the existing building adjacent to Franklin Rd. and the warehouse proposed in the rear building facing industrial zoned land should be compatible with existing and future abutting industrial and commercial uses. • "Require appropriate landscaping,buffers, and noise mitigation with new development along transportation corridors(setback,vegetation, low walls,berms, etc.)."(3.07.01 C) A 35 foot wide landscaped street buffer will be required with development along E. Franklin Rd., an arterial street and entryway corridor, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. • "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and urban services at the time of final approval, and in accord with any adopted levels of service for public facilities and services."(3.03.03F) City water and sewer service is available in E. Franklin Rd. and can be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. • "Require appropriate building design, and landscaping elements to buffer, screen,beautify, and integrate commercial,multifamily, and parking lots into existing neighborhoods."(5.01.02D) Street buffer and parking lot landscaping will be required with development in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C and 11-3B-8C, respectively. The design of the new structure is required to be consistent with the standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. • "Reduce the number of existing access points onto arterial streets by using methods such as cross- access agreements, access management, and frontage/backage roads, and promoting local and collector street connectivity."(6.01.02B) The Applicant will be required to grant cross-access easements to adjacent properties to the east and west with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A.2, unless otherwise waived by Council. The Applicant is requesting a waiver from City Council to not provide cross-access easements to Page 4 adjacent properties due to the topography of the site combined with the space available for development with retention of the existing structure. • "Annex lands into the corporate boundaries of the City only when the annexation proposal conforms to the City's vision and the necessary extension of public services and infrastructure is provided." (3.03.03) The proposed annexation and flex space use of the property conforms to the City's vision and City water and sewer services are available to be extended to the property. Fire and police service are already provided in this area. VI. STAFF ANALYSIS A. ANNEXATION&ZONING The area proposed to be annexed consists of 1.01 acres of land and includes land to the section line of E. Franklin Rd. The property is currently zoned RUT and located in Ada County. The Applicant proposes to annex the property into the City with a C-G zoning district consistent with the associated FLUM designation of Commercial. A conceptual development plan is proposed as shown in Section VIII.B. The proposed annexation area is contiguous to City annexed property and is within the Area of City Impact Boundary.A legal description and exhibit map for the annexation area is included in Section VIII.A. The topography of this site slopes down significantly from Franklin Rd. to the north property boundary and has approximately a 20 foot grade difference as shown on the grading plan in Section VIII.B. A retaining wall is depicted on the concept plan at the north and west boundaries of the area proposed to be improved with this project. There is an existing residential home on the property that the Applicant proposes to remodel and expand for a flex space use. The concept plan depicts 2,239 square feet(s.f.) of office on the first floor and 1,550 s.f. of office and support uses in the basement of the existing structure, and a new 2,600 s.f. structure for a warehouse.The new structure is proposed to the north behind the existing structure and will include a daylight basement. The user will be an automotive tool and equipment supplier, classified as a flex space use. The business proposes to sell products online to automotive businesses and at-home mechanics and will not conduct any retail sales on the site. Flex space is listed in UDC Table 11-213-2 as a principal permitted use in the C-G zoning district subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-18: Flex Space,as follows: A. Office and/or retail showroom areas shall comprise a minimum of thirty percent(30%) of the structure and/or tenant space. The proposed office/support use comprises approximately 60%of the structure in accord with this standard; retail sale of products to the public is not proposed. B. Light industry and warehousing shall not comprise more than seventy percent(70%)of the tenant space.At approximately 4001o, the proposed warehouse area complies with this standard. C. In the C-C, C-G and M-E Districts,roll-up doors shall not be visible from a public street. One roll-up door is proposed at the rear of the structure, which isn't visible from E. Franklin Rd. D. Except in the I-L and I-H Districts,loading docks are prohibited.No loading docks are proposed; because this property is proposed to be zoned C-G, loading docks are prohibited. E. Retail use shall not exceed twenty five percent(25%)of leasable area in any tenant space. No retail sales are proposed. The proposed use and site design complies with the above listed standards. Compliance with the dimensional standards for the C-G zoning district listed in UDC Table 11-213-3 is also required. The existing and proposed structures comply with the minimum setback requirements of the district. A 35' Page 5 wide street buffer is required with development along Franklin Rd., an entryway corridor, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-313-7C. The existing driveway access via Franklin Rd. is proposed to remain for access to the site and has been approved by ACHD. Because it closely aligns with a driveway on the south side of Franklin Rd., relocation of the driveway is not recommended. The UDC (11-3A-3A.2)requires cross-access/ingress- egress easements to be granted to adjoining properties where access to a local street is not available, unless otherwise waived by City Council. In accord with this standard,because access isn't available via a local street, Staff recommends cross-access easements are provided and driveways constructed to the properties to the east and west. A 20-foot wide cross-access easement is depicted on the concept plan to the east and west but the Applicant requests Council approval of a waiver to this requirement to not provide cross-access easements due to the topography of the site and site constraints related to the space available for development.At a minimum, Staff recommends Council require cross- access to the west.Note: Staff contacted Ada County to see if a cross-access easement was provided to the subject property with re-development of the adjacent property to the west but has yet to receive an answer. A minimum of one(1) off-street vehicle parking space is required to be provided for every 500 square feet of gross floor area; and one(1)bicycle parking space is required for every 25 proposed vehicle spaces or portion thereof. Based on 6,389 square feet, a minimum of 12 vehicle spaces and one(1) bicycle space is required. A total of 13 spaces are depicted on the conceptual site plan,including an ADA space,which is one more than required. However,if cross-access driveways are provided to adjacent properties as required by the UDC, it will reduce the parking by up to(3)spaces,which will result in parking below the required minimum standard. If a waiver is not approved by Council to the requirement for cross-access to be provided to adjacent properties to the east and west,the Applicant may apply for alternative compliance to UDC 11-3C-6B.1; or,construct a smaller addition to reduce the parking requirement. Parking lot landscaping is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11- 3B-8C,which requires a minimum 5-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer adjacent to parking, loading or other paved vehicular use areas,landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B- 8C.1b.A retaining wall and fence is proposed along the west boundary adjacent to the parallel parking spaces where the buffer is required,which doesn't leave adequare area for landscaping.If the site cannot be reconfigured to comply with this standard, alternative compliance may be requested with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. The Snyder Lateral exists in a 40-foot wide easement on the northern portion of the property that is not proposed to be improved. All irrigation laterals are required to be piped unless improved as a water amenity or linear open space as defined in UDC 11-1A-1 as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6B. The City Council may waive this requirement if it finds the public purpose requiring such will not be served and public safety can be preserved per UDC 11-3A-6B.3a. The Applicant proposes to fence off the area where the lateral is located to preserve public safety and requests a Council waiver to this requirement. Because a large portion of this site on the north end is not proposed to be improved, Staff recommends weeds are regularly maintained in this area so as not to create a nuisance and in a manner that prevents wildfire in accord with MCC 4-2. Conceptual building elevations with materials were submitted as shown in Section VIII.0 of the remodel of the existing structure and proposed addition. The materials for the front fagade and sides of the existing building consist of stucco with pre-finished metal siding and stone veneer accents; the materials for the proposed warehouse addition consist of a mix of horizontal and vertical metal siding. All improvements to the existing structure and new construction are required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. A Certificate of Zoning Page 6 Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted to the Planning Division and approved prior to submittal of a building permit application. The City may require a development agreement(DA)in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. To ensure the site develops as proposed with this application and as recommended by Staff in accord with UDC standards,Staff recommends a DA is required as a provision of annexation(see provision in Section IX.A). VII. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Annexation&Zoning with the requirement of a Development Agreement per the provisions in Section IX in accord with the Findings in Section X. Page 7 VIII. EXHIBITS A. Annexation&Zoning Legal Description and Exhibit Map 9233 WESTSTA_E STREET I BOISE,ID 93714 1 208.639.6939 I FAX 208.639,6930 septer'nt 22,2Q20 Project No.20-113 Exhi bit A Legal Description far Annexatlon and Rezone to C-G A parcel of land situated in a portion of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 8,Township 3 North,Range 1 East, B_M.,Ada County, Idaho and being mare particularly described as follows_ Commencing at a found brass cap marking the Southeast turner of saki Section 8,which bears h189'54'35"W a distance of 2,571.03 fiat from a found brass cap marking cite South.1/4 corner of said section 8, Thence following the southerly I l ne of said Southeast 1/4,bl89'54'35"W a disuncE of 1,171.79 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNINGS Th ence following Slid southerly Ii ne;,N89'54'35"W a distance of 152.04 feet; Thence leaving said southerly line,ND7°1.2'WE a distance of 290,38 feet to a found 0-inch rebafon the boundary I I ne of Olson a ntt Bush Subdivision No-3(Book 107,Pages 14,905—14,997 of Plats); Thence fol lowing said subdivision boundary line the following two�2)courses- 1. 589'58'15"E a distance of 149.84 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar, 2, 500'13'25"E a distance of 290.54 feet to the PMNT OF BEGINNING. Sold parcel contains 1.OD6 a ores,more or less,a nd is subject to all exlsti ng easome nts a nd/ar rights-of- way of rewrd or implied. All subdivisions,deeds,records of wrvew,and other instruments of record referenced herein are recorded domments of the could in which these described lands are slUmtad In, Attached hereto is Exh2it B and by this reference is hereby made a part of. AIL LAND 0 6B cry, �a bF #BSc ENGINEERS SURVEYORS I PLANNERS Page 8 Olson and Guth Sul division MD-3 Lot 8 Lot 3 isr t f) 0 c%1 HOMM ArEa: 1,095w AC ` iJnQlatited A AM`u37A644SO d C� LCrt 11 51106M1385A5 co Cukr�nLZoning=RUT ° Propa9e6 Zoning:{-iv cy N jar} O � O � � Uti 0 v $ P(MNT OF BEG�ININ6 7y71.t4' 8 9 _ 1�47-�D� N89'54'3 rt2, 4" — 17# 16 -------�— N69'54'35'W 2573.os'--- �._--------� ' S 1/4 CORNER SMTIOM a EIASM OF 0EAMND POINT OF COMMERCEMENT FOLdNf} RPAGS CAP E. Franklin Rd, SE CORNER SE)nON a PER CP&.F INST. Nu. iO41$7@B4 LEGEND MIMID BRASS C.4P "IRS 5291 12-04* 0 50 100 i5p FOUND BRASS CAF 5/9YaNCH REMR Phan 5c3fe:1"w 50' a 1 2-INiGH REBID CALCULATED POINT &amREZONE f30UmDARy —"*STING RfGHT-OF-WAY i ` — — —SEQTK4N LJNE E NV I M E E R I W G 9213 WEST STATEWMFr ` AIWCE T BOUNDARY LINE SORE,IMW BR14. P"5 1210 63-40!9 EXHIBIT B w �dlP.ram CAM alfano ANNEXATION AN 1) REZONE TO C'C PAWECn 7C :13 SHED A PORTION OF THE 5 V2 OF THE SE 114 OF 1 OF 1 SECTION 8, T314, RIE, ADA COUNTY, IDAH0 Page 9 B. Conceptual Development Plan&Grading Exhibit(dated: November 5,2020) k I f I I L--' I __--L FlFtlllllJN RO . p "!li km i6FL Page 10 w� Am E FHA.Yi4JH-no i' — — km id)Fi Page 11 C. Conceptual Building Elevations(dated: September 10, 2020) y Or"L YEhidlaM _tii l�I.E�ILIe�enx+.W nFa&P&LE +.i 1 WLG�IG MMEH r r h�� A3.Y1 CrFCE�� _C71 r"wa v i RIM } ..� Page 12 IX. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. A Development Agreement(DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s)at the time of annexation ordinance adoption,and the developer. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the conceptual development plan included in Section VIII.B, applicable standards in the Unified Development Code, and the provisions contained herein. b. Cross-access/ingress-egress easements shall be granted to adjoining properties to the east and west with development as set forth in UDC 11-3A-3A.2,unless otherwise waived by City Council. Driveways shall be constructed within the easements to the property boundary to facilitate future cross-access between properties. Recorded copies of the easements shall be submitted to the Planning Division with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. c. The Snyder Lateral,lying on the northern portion of the subject property, shall be piped or otherwise covered with development as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6B,unless otherwise waived by City Council. d. The unimproved portion of the site shall be regularly maintained in a manner that prevents weeds from being a nuisance and prevents wildfire in accord with MCC 4-2. e. All development shall comply with the structure and site design standards listed in UDC 11-3A- 19 and the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 Sanitary sewer and water service lines currently exist to this address. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT No comments were received. D. POLICE DEPARTMENT No comments were received. E. PARK'S DEPARTMENT No comments were received. F. ADA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT https://weblink.m eridia n c i ty.ory/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=214 62 8&db id=0&repo=Meridian City G. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https://weblink.meridiancioy.ory/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=21641 S&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiU Page 13 X. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-513-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; Staff finds the Applicant's proposal to annex the subject 1.01 acre property with a C-G zoning district for the development of a flex space use is consistent with the associated Commercial FLUM designation for this property. (See Section V above for more information) 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; Staff finds the proposed map amendment and subsequent development will comply with the regulations of the C-G zoning district and will provide for the service needs of the community in accord with the purpose statement of the Commercial districts. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; Staff finds the proposed map amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and Stafffinds the proposed map amendment will not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City, including the school district. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. Staff finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City. Page 14