CZC, DES Comment Response Log
REVIEW COMMENT AND RESPONSE LOG
Date:
October 14, 2020
Project Manager:
Stephanie Leonard
Client/Owner:
GFI Meridian Investments II, LLC.
Project Title and Location:
Lost Rapids Apartments and Townhomes
Type of Review:
No. Section/
Item
Review Comment KM Engineering Response
Review comments from: City of Meridian Planning Department dated 9.25.2020
1
Elevation for trash enclosures depicting building
materials/colors
Detail is enclosed. Material is tan CMU.
2 Revise the site/landscape plan as follows (per the
CUP conditions):
a
Depict a tree and planter area at the west end of
the row of parking on the southeast side of the
clubhouse.
Planter and tree have been added.
b Provide additional bicycle racks between Buildings
C & D and D & E and for Building I. Bike racks were added. See key note #3.
c
Depict location of dog waste & washing stations –
is the area going to be fenced? If so, depict fenced
area that is 5,000 s.f. in area.
Location depicted on L1.0. No Fencing. See open space
exhibit for SF.
d
Depict details for site amenities (i.e. a plaza with
outdoor seating, BBQ and tables & a neighborhood
business center in clubhouse that complies with
the standards below – as proposed at the hearing).
(Key Notes #4 & #5 state, “final design to be
established prior to final permit submittal” –
details need to be submitted now and notes need
to be revised).
Details have been added. See L5.0.
e
Relocate the fence along the east boundary of the
site a minimum of 5 feet from the back side of the
sidewalk (i.e. south of the east/west driveway
between Buildings H & I).
Revised.
f
Include detailed parking calculations that
demonstrate compliance with the standards in
UDC Table 11-3C-6
Detailed calculations were added to L1.0.
g
A 10’ wide minimum building setback is required
from the property line per UDC 11-4-3-27B.1 – the
NWC of Building F doesn’t meet the minimum
setback
Revised.
h Depict location of bus stop per VRT’s email VRT stop add east of entrance to site. See L1.0.
i A minimum of 80 s.f. of private usable open space
is required for each unit per UDC 11-4-3-27B.3 –
See included floor plans showing SF for private open
space.
PAGE | 2
The 3 internal units on Building Type 3 don’t
appear to comply
j Depict location of mailboxes Depicted. See L5.0.
3
This property isn’t eligible for building permits until
the plat records (or a PBA is approved and a ROS
recorded for the current configuration of the
property). Is the property boundary shown on the
site plan & landscape plan exactly the same as that
on the final plat? If not, include any revisions in
revised plans.
Understood; yes the boundary is the same as that
depicted on the final plat.
4 Warranty deed in GFI’s name instead of Costco’s
(submit when you get it once the FP records) Understood.
5
Please ensure future structures along Lost Rapids
Dr. comply with this standard (the renderings
appear to, just want to make sure)
Elevations complying with this standard are included
herein. We propose to include three different color
schemes on the townhomes. In addition, the following
changes have been made:
Scheme 2 - gable has been modified from stucco to
board and batten.
Scheme 3 - leaving the gable stucco, but changing the
reveal pattern and then adding board and batten below
the gable.
Scheme 4 - adding shake siding in the gable, and
keeping the stucco below.