Z - Signed Findings Item#3.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EN
DIAN:
AND DECISION& ORDER
In the Matter of the Request for Annexation and Zoning,by Clint Hansen,Land Solutions.
Case No(s). 2020-0078
For the City Council Hearing Date of: September 8,2020(Findings on September 22,2020)
A. Findings of Fact
I. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 8,2020, incorporated
by reference)
2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 8, 2020, incorporated
by reference)
3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 8,
2020, incorporated by reference)
4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing
date of September 8,2020, incorporated by reference)
B. Conclusions of Law
I. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use
Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503).
2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as
Title I I Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by
ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian,
which was adopted December 17,2019, Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps.
3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § I I-5A.
4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental
subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction.
5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose
expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed.
6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be
signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the
Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party
requesting notice.
7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the
hearing date of September8,2020,incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be
FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER
FOR(1625 E.BENTLEY DRIVE—FILE#2020-0078.) - I - Page 83
Item#3.
reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the
application.
C. Decision and Order
Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon
the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that:
1. The applicant's request for annexation and zoning is hereby approved per the conditions of
approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of September 8,2020, attached as Exhibit A.
D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits
Notice of Development Agreement Duration
The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a
development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development
agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or
rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request.
A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development
agreement.Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in
accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the
property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the
modification.
A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the
agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement
to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval
period.
E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis
1. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian.
When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person
who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the
governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order
seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,Idaho Code.
F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of September 8,2020.
FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER
FOR(1625 E.BENTLEY DRIVE—FILE#2020-0078.) -2- Page 84
Item#3.
22nd September
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the day of ,
2020.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED AYE
COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED AYE
COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED AYE
COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED AYE
COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED AYE
COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED AYE
MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED
(TIE BREAKER)
Mayor Robert E. Simison
Attest:
Chris Johnson
City Clerk
Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City
Attorney.
By: Dated: 9-22-2020
City Clerk's Office
FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER
FOR(1625 E.BENTLEY DRIVE—FILE#2020-0078.) -3 - Page 85
Item#3.
EXH I BIT A
STAFF REPORT E IDIANn-=-
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A H O
HEARING 9/8/2020 Legend
DATE: ff � ® 0
❑
TO: Mayor&City Council
FROM: Alan Tiefenbach,Associate Planner
208-489-0573 ------ -�
SUBJECT: H-2020-0078 -
1625 E. Bentley Drive O --
LOCATION: The site is located within the southeast ---
quadrant of S. Locust Grove Rd. and E.
Bentley Dr. (north of I-84)., in the SW 1/4
of Section 17,Township 3 N.,Range
1W. m1919
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Annexation&zoning of 1.55 acres of land with Community Business District(C-C)zoning district to
allow a 4,800 sf+/-office flex building,by Clint Hansen of Land Solutions. The applicant may
eventually build a second commercial building.
II. SUMMARY OF REPORT
A. Project Summary
Description Details Page
Acreage 1.55
Future Land Use Designation Commercial
Existing Land Use(s) Single Family/Rural
Proposed Land Use(s) Commercial Office Flex Space
Lots(#and type;bldg./common) 2 parcels
Number of Residential Units(type None(existing house to be removed)
of units)
Physical Features(waterways, No significant physical features.
hazards,flood plain,hillside)
Neighborhood meeting date;#of May 26,2020—14 attendees signed in.
attendees:
B. Community Metrics
Description Details Page
Ada County Highway District
• Staff report(yes/no) No
Pagel
Page 86
Item#3.
Description Details Page
• Requires ACHD Commission No
Action(yes/no)
Access(Arterial/Collectors/State There is only one point of through access
Hwy/Local)(Existing and Proposed) to this property—From S.Locust Grove
Rd.to S.Truss PI/E.Bentley Dr. There
is presently no eastern through access due
to cul-de-sacs and dead end streets.
Stub Street/Interconnectivity/Cross Access There is an unnamed stub(ROW in front
of the property)that dead-ends just east
(but does not connect)to S.Locust Grove
Rd.Westbound E.Bentley Dr.connects
to S.Locust Grover Rd.
Existing Road Network Arterial and Local Streets
Existing Arterial Sidewalks/Buffers The applicant will be responsible for a
25'wide landscape buffer along S.
Locust Grove Rd(sidewalks already exist
in this area), 10'buffer and curb,gutter
and sidewalk along S.Truss Pl.,and a 25'
residential buffer along the south property
line.
Proposed Road Improvements S.Locust Grove Rd.has recently been
widened and there is a roundabout
planned for the S.Locust Grove Rd./E.
Bentley Dr.intersection.
Fire Service—No comments submitted
Police Service—No comments submitted
Wastewater
• Distance to Sewer Services 0
• Sewer Shed Five Mile Trunkshed
• Estimated Project Sewer ERU's See Application
• WRRF Declining Balance 13.97
• Project Consistent with WW Yes
Master Plan/Facility Plan
• Impacts/Concerns • Flow is committed
• No proposed changes to Public Sewer
Infrastructure has been shown within
record.Any changes or modifications
to the public sewer infrastructure shall
be reviewed and approved by Public
Works.
Water
• Distance to Water Services 0
• Pressure Zone 3
• Estimated Project Water ERU's See application
• Water Quality No concerns
• Project Consistent with Water N/A
Master Plan
• Impacts/Concerns No changes to public water infrastructure proposed.
Page 2
Page 87
1 1 1
oil son
1111 .rIN
son, IS
LrLI
tT
ICI C;.M1 �•F y71 4 5 - -� }
g are rr
�L�:I
I?
— , 1'r
_■■ i luau ,44 yi
Elm IN
1.0
p1�N•:MIN Aw
III
1■ S■11■
i _ MEN- son I ■WWI
�lI.II III ry... •...■ ...■ . G'F.:. Gi on iG.G�ill
- _ . .. .
mom°:
5• ■ S•
111 A -2 111 A _ xl
1 _ 1II
.II�11111 ■■_■■q :.::�11111 ■■_■■q I
a —�
&1 MF 84
x�u■ ■uw i ! �aa.. .op i=
u i 1 u uii..nu.. .... �■ ■
em u■ ■■ IN au■ ■u J ■■■ .
pl�a�■�� uu pr.+o■�� uu r..
Item#3.
IV. NOTICING
Planning&Zoning City Council
Posting Date Posting Date
Newspaper Notification 7/7/2020 8/21/2020
Radius notification mailed to
properties within 300 feet 7/14/2020 8/18/2020
Public hearing notice sign posted
7/24/2020 8/27/2020
on site
Nextdoor posting 7/14/2020 8/18/2020
V. STAFF ANALYSIS
A. Annexation:
The proposed annexation area is contiguous to City annexed property and is within the Area of
City Impact Boundary. To ensure the site develops as proposed by the applicant, staff is
recommending a development agreement as part of the annexation approval.
B. Future Land Use Map Designation(https://www.meridianciu.orglcompplan)
This property is designated as Commercial on the City's Future Land Use Map (FL UM)
contained in the Comprehensive Plan.
This designation is to provide a full range of commercial uses to serve area residents and
visitors. Desired uses may include retail, restaurants,personal and professional services, and
office uses, as well as appropriate public and quasi public uses.
The annexation area is near existing public services and is adjacent to the city limits.Although
the majority of the properties in this area east of S. Locust Grove Road and north of I-84 are
rural residential, the land directly surrounding the subject property is recommended for
commercial uses. Also, approximately 350 feet to the east of the property, the FLUM recommends
mixed use neighborhood.Most of the land on the west side of S. Locust Grove Rd. and south of I-
84 is zoned commercial; directly across S. Locust Grove Rd. there are several large non-
residential developments such as the Renaissance High School and the Idaho College of
Osteopathic Medicine. The professional office flex space (for professional services)proposed
under this annexation complies with the recommendations of the FL UM and would provide an
appropriate transition in intensity from a commercial corridor to the existing residential at the
north and east.
The City may require a development agreement(DA) in conjunction with an annexation pursuant
to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. In order to ensure the site develops as proposed with this
application, staff recommends a DA as a provision of annexation with the provisions included in
Section VIIL.A. The DA is required to be signed by the property owner(s)/developer and returned
to the City within 6 months of the Council granting the annexation for approval by City Council
and subsequent recordation.
Comprehensive Plan Policies (https://www.meridiancity.or /g compplan):
The following Comprehensive Plan Policies are applicable to this development:
• Focus on developing industries that tend to exceed the living wage, such as technology,
healthcare and other similar industries. (2.06.01E)
Page 4
Page 89
Item#3.
This annexation proposes a 4,300 square foot building for a land surveying company. This is
considered a professional service, which may be a primary employer with higher wages.
• Work with existing industrial businesses to expand or relocate operations to appropriate
areas. (2.08.03C)
The business proposed with this annexation is presently located at 213 E. Sth Ave. in Meridian
in a shared 3,800 square foot building. The existing business leases approximately 1,300
square feet of available space. The applicant has stated the size and configuration of the
present building does not lend itself to the existing operations and there is no room for
expansion. The applicant intends to construct and own a larger building designed for the
operations which would also allow more flexibility in workspaces.
According to the conceptual site plan submitted by the Applicant, the new office building
would be constructed on the southern half of the property, to allow the possibility to
eventually construct a second commercial building on the northern portion. The
Comprehensive Plan supports this type of business in the proposed location.
• Encourage infill development. (3.03.01E)
The Comprehensive Plan defines infill as "development on vacant parcels, or redevelopment
of existing parcels to a higher and better use that is surrounded by developed property within
the City of Meridian." The subject property is surrounded by existing development on all
sides, is directly adjacent to a commercial corridor, contains a vacant single family residence
and is already connected to city water and sewer.
• Focus development and redevelopment intensity on key transportation corridors. (3.07.02C)
The proposed office flex building is proposed adjacent to S. Locust Grove Rd., a key
transportation corridor.
• Encourage compatible uses and site design to minimize conflicts and maximize use of land.
(3.07.00)
The surrounding neighborhood consists of primarily low density single family residential.
The FL UM recommends the subject property and to the south for commercial uses, medium
density residential to the north and mixed use neighborhood to the east. To the west of the
property(across S. Locust Grove Rd.) are higher intensity non-residential uses such as the
Renaissance High School and the Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine. South of the
property(south ofI--84) are intensive commercial uses such as drive through restaurants and
movie theaters. The proposed office flex building in this location will provide an appropriate
transition from the residential and mixed use residential uses to the east to the commercial
uses to the west and south.
• "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities
and urban services at the time of final approval, and in accord with any adopted levels of
service for public facilities and services."(3.03.03F)
City water and sewer service is available along S. Locust Grove Rd. and can be extended by
the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21.
Page 5
Page 90
Item#3.
C. Existing Structures/Site Improvements:
There is an existing 2,123 single family residence on the property, constructed in 1972.As the
property is proposed to be zoned to C-C, which does not allow single family residential, the
existing house should be required to be removed as part of the annexation agreement.
Proposed Use Analysis:
Office buildings are listed as a principal permitted use (professional services) in the C-C zoning
districts in UDC Table I1-2B-1.
The applicant's intent is to construct a new 4,800 square foot building on the southern portion of
the property. However, the applicant has indicated a second commercial building may be built to
the north. The property consists of a I acre parcel and a small.2 acre `strip of land"so it is
possible the applicant could do a boundary line adjustment to create an additional buildable lot.
At staffs request, the applicant has provided the conceptual layout for both buildings. The site
plan provided reflects commercial buildings at the north and south perimeters of the property,
with parking central to the development. Staff believes the layout as proposed is an efficient
design for the property.
As the applicant intends this project to build out in two phases, staff has concerns that the
undeveloped half of the property will remain a "no-man's land"while the other ha f builds out.
Staff recommends that the undeveloped portion of the property be seeded with native seed and
maintained free of weeds until such a time as future development occurs.
D. Dimensional Standards(UDC 11-2):
The zoning is proposed to be C-C. This requires no street setback but does require a 25'
landscape buffer along arterial roads (S. Locust Grove Road) and 10'buffer along S. Truss Pl.A
25'residential landscape buffer is also required at the south of the property, adjacent to the
neighboring existing single family residence. Building height is limited to 50'.
E. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3):
There are specific requirements regarding flex space. This includes roll-up doors not being
visible from a public street and loading docks being prohibited. The conceptual elevations show
the roll up doors on the north side of the building(away from S. Locust Grove Road),parking
oriented toward the center of the buildings, and no loading docks. If a second building is
constructed as proposed, this will also help minimize the view of the garage doors from public
street view.
F. Access(11-3A-3):
Access to this property will occur from two points off of S. Truss Pl. S. Truss Pl. connects to E.
Bentley Dr. and out to S. Locust Grove Rd(an arterial). The applicant has stated ACHD will
require them to add curb, gutter and sidewalk along S. Truss Pl. to the south extent of their
property. There is an existing stub off E. Bentley Dr. north of the subject property, which
terminates in a dead end east of S. Locust Grove Rd. The applicant does not propose access from
this street and ACHD is not requiring improvements to this road.
G. Parking(UDC 11-3C):
Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table
11-3C-6 for commercial districts based on one space per 500 feet of gross floor area. With a
Page 6
Page 91
Item#3.
proposed building size of 4,835 square feet, 10 parking spaces would be required. The
conceptual site plan indicates 17 parking spaces for the first building, and the same amount of
parking spaces for a conceptual second building. The parking requirements are satisfied, but staff
notes the final number will probably be less because UDC 11-3B-8 requires an internal planter
island of at least 50 square feet for every row of more than 12 parking spaces.
H. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-17):
Sidewalks already exist along S. Locust Grove Rd. The Applicant is required to add curb, gutter
and sidewalk along S. Truss Pl. to the south extent of their property line.
I. Parkways(UDC 11-3A-17):
No parkways are proposed with this development.
J. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B):
The applicant will be required to install a 25'wide buffer along S. Locust Grove RD. as is
required for arterial streets, a 10'landscape buffer along S. Truss Pl. and E. Bentley Dr. as is
required for local streets, and a 25'wide landscape at the south of the property as is required for
any parcel sharing a contiguous lot line with a residential land use per UDC 11-2B. Parking lot
landscaping, including 5'buffers adjacent to parking, loading and other vehicular use areas,
including the possibility ofplanter islands, will also be required per UDC 11-3B.
As mentioned, the applicant's plans reflect the desire to construct the first commercial building
as phase one, and eventually construct a second building on the other half of the property.As
mentioned above, staff is recommending the undeveloped portion of the property be seeded with
native seed and maintained free of weeds until such a time as future development occurs.
K. Tree preservation(11-3B-10)
There are several existing trees on site.At time of CZC submittal, the applicant will be required
to work with the City Arborist if removal is proposed.A mitigation plan may be required which
would be required to indicate the total number and caliper inches of trees proposed for removal
and the total number of replacement trees proposed.
L. Waterways (UDC 11-3A-6):
There are no significant waterways on the property.
M. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, I1-3A-7):
The concept plans do not indicate any fencing.All fencing is required to comply with the
standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6C and 11-3A-7.
N. Utilities(UDC 11-3A-21):
Public services are available to accommodate the proposed development. The subject property is
already connected to City water and sewer which was installed with recent expansions to S.
Locust Grove Road.
O. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual):
The Applicant has submitted sample elevations of the proposed office flex building for this project
(see Section VII).
Page 7
Page 92
Item#3.
The conceptual elevations show a one-story office building comprised of metal and fiber cement
siding, with a sloping roof.As is required by UDC 11-4-3-18 for flex space, the roll-up doors are
faced to the north, away from public streets.At time of CZC and DES submittal, complete
architectural elevations with materials called out will be required and the architecture will be
reviewed against the Architectural Standards Manual(ASM). It does appear that the conceptual
elevations might not meet the standards of the ASM in regard to buildings with rooflines SO feet
in length incorporating roofline and parapet variations.Also, the Applicant should be aware that
untextured concrete panels and prefabricated steel panels are prohibited as field materials for
building fa(!ades, except when used with a minimum of two other qualifying field materials and
meeting all other standard fenestration and material requirements. The applicant site and
building design is required to comply with the design standards in the UDC and the ASM.
VI. DECISION
A. Staff:
Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation and zoning with the requirement of a
Development Agreement with the conditions noted in Section VIII per the Findings in Section
IX.
B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard this item on August 6,2020. At the public
hearing,the Commission voted to recommend approval of the subject annexation request.
1. Summary of Commission Public Hearing
a. In favor: Clint Hansen,Land Solutions
b. In opposition:None
c. Commenting: Clint Hansen,Land Solutions
d. Written testimony: Robert and Lindeen Neufeld and Jeannette Tanner
e. Staff presenting application: Alan Tiefenbach
f. Other Staff commenting on application:None
2. Key issue(s) testimon.
a. None
3. Ke, ids)of discussion by Commission
a. Commissioners discussed an earlier site plan in the case file versus the newer one
included in the staff report. Staff responded that the previous site plan did not show a second
building. As staff was writing the staff report,the applicant had mentioned they intended to
reconfigure a second lot and construct a second commercial building. Staff and the applicant
worked together to arrive at a revised site plan that demonstrated this.
b. The Commission asked whether the elevations submitted with the staff report would also
change. The applicant responded that they probably would. Staff added the elevations
submitted probably would not meet the requirements of the Architectural Standards Manual
(ASM)but staff would work with the applicant on this during the Certificate of Zoning
Compliance(CZC).
c. Commission discussed hours of operation and whether there would be exterior lighting
that would impact the adjacent residences.Applicant responded the hours would be normal
Page 8
Page 93
Item#3.
office hours between 8AM and 5PM, and any exterior lighting would be downcast and
shielded as required b, t�gulations.
4. Outstanding issue(s) for Council.
a. None
C. The Meridian City Council heard this item on September 8,2020.At the public hearing the
Council moved to approve the subject annexation and zoning.
1. Summary of the City Council public hearing
a. In favor: Clint Hansen, Land Solutions
b. In opposition: None
C. Commenting
d. Written testimony: Robert and Lindeen Neufeld, Jeannette Tanner, Glenna Newby,
Barbara Valdez,Ja, m�go, Glenna Newby
e. Staff presenting application: Alan Tiefenbach
f. Other Staff commenting on application:None
2. Key issue(s) testimony:
a. None
3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council:
a. Whether or not the E. Bentley"stub street"should be vacated.
b. Height of buildings
c. Traffic
d. Limiting uses to office only
4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation:
a. Add restriction to the development agreement that allows only office uses for both
buildings.
Page 9
Page 94
Item#3.
VII. EXHIBITS
A. Annexation Legal Description and Exhibit Map(date 6/26/2020)
Legal Description
1625 E. BendeX Dr. — Annexation and Rezone
A Paree4 tacatao in the S of Section 17. Townzhip 3 North, Range I East, Borse Meridian.
Ada f soursty, Idaitt, and mars particularly descrr-bed as follows-.
Gommancing at a Sraae Cap monument marking the northwest comer rki said SW 1/. ffom Which
Bross Cap monument marking the southwest corner or sgid SW 'A tears 3 D°30'33' VV a
distance of 265S.46 feet:
Thence 5 0"W33" VV along We westerly bou-ndary 9 said SW 1/.a distance of 627.57 feet to the
PGINT OF BEGINNING;
ThfRnQe leaving said wesierly 15o rpd-�ry $ 89"57'27" I= a distance cf 239.31 fbet to a peirvt,
I hence fv 4a'3b'46' E a bMstance&;s4.-�6 feet le a paint on the centerline of E Bemlay Dnya;
Thenc* along said centerline a distance of 29.54 feet along the are of a 100.00 foot radius non-
targeni curve Jett, sail# curve havrng a central -angle of W55 40' and v long chord t)eafing �
54'51'05- E a distance of 29.44 feet to a 518 inch cebar marking the Intersection of E. Bentley
Ocive an#S. Truss
77ienae along tie aenteriine of Sato S Truss Place the f0cwing de5rrized cocirses.
Theme e distance of 56.07 feet along the arc of a 125 P5 foot radius non-tangent curve
lie t.said curve having a central angle of 25`42'39r anal a lwn4 chord bearing S 13`49'46'
W a drstanoe of 55 30 feet tff�g paint;
Thence S 0'58'27"W a distance of 197.08 fret to a poi nt-
Then re jeaving slid oenterline N B9'57'26"VV a drstance of 272.73 feat to a pelnt on the westerly
bouhdkiry of said SW Y41
Tience along said wesredy hQuridary N 4'30'33" E m dislartce of 24-2 95 feet to ttie POINT OF
BEGINNING.
This pafQal c-untoini 67,291 square feet (1.55 acres)and Is subject to arty easements existing or
in use
Clinton VV. Ranieri. PL;S ` .A���
Land Solutions. Pam ` ti S 7 J'
4%jne 26. 2020 q- .
0
C
Page 10
Page 95
Item#3.
1625 E. BEI TLEY DR. - ANNEXATION AND REZONE
EXHIBIT
1 f4
,R 17
5
S:
ri4
E BEI11k�E'f GR a
r = �
1 fAllLfl s11i73254#7 c�
UkPLAITM
POINT OF
13EGINMRJG—
:LWTWV�As5ifD23�ma 59 r.
II "EEL SIIJM2i477 — —
zl r —
{7JRY1 T0.9Lf
I CURSE f LENGTH RiW)S DELTA REARING CHORD
� i 1DTAL AREA . 87,29h SF I CI Ss 1G W 16wmr $71 ,an 2"4, f
(1,55 ACRES) ti� C2 559T 12&W �y<3f S1S'�4'96"� 55dd '
1 P.+AL73 giiF7S]5474 4J 7eF.4s' IWX 3 151'Ir MOUIST 593.1'
#MCA
' C5 1W-W 18aOt1' SI1CU'19` H94'S7e5'k id'I, '
TsT
H69�7'26"N 27273' � —
I 1
I
I PlRCF.i 3:"7SE574]
I I
14
I
1 7 E OYSL NI} FM.
r4
LLApjD
S T
q
ar---i
j 0 F r i nd Surveying and Consulting
G 40 80 1 EO'
W. MOAN.ID U147
12m 299,200
WMw tliM1tlw714/r+1i 4C l' 7" '
Page 11
Page 96
»m�
B. Proposed Concept Site Plan(&z 7/30/70 q
I '- -
7 :
In
POINT OF
Ln
BE%&NG
3/E � ` 589I7'7/E y Cam'
/3
L.;NDSCAPE AREA 9.0 ~�
154 a
� ummGLAYOUT � qb;
\ ` \\ \ r E G Q RE DING /T WN QE ARC \
§ . ƒ T I ae TOTAL A w = 9je»y
5 ' � °E
\ '
ƒ
!(� . CL.
\\ A'%3E 2 17.0, ^ 2 q
y , M
3
BLOCK ] /
StC AKA = 2,967 J ^ \`
§ 98)
. \ _
_ �j �) / 3 �
z \\y %U SSR
LAND SOLUTIONS
�e �
� q �Z 2 /
! � �
Q m:G+ aREi
N %/28) : 204.59,
. �K*r a
] ^ ^ *9325700 `N
Page !2
Pge9
Item#3.
C. Proposed Elevations(date: 6/26/2020)
r�lfl
RR o
LJLJ
S011Efl HEVATFON
� —I s� .J,.rt,�r,r;.°r:•�.ice'"
- ®� -
3O Vwr 1 �EASi ELEVA?ION ..WH.T ELEVATION
Z ��B
7- 7-- j
3O Yew 2
oarrti,ELEvanoN
VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS
A. PLANNING DIVISION
1. A Development Agreement(DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property.
Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of
Meridian,the property owner(s)at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the
developer.
Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to
commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the
Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA
shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions:
a. Uses on the nroneM shall be limited to office uses only.
b. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the
conceptual site plan and conceptual building elevations included in Section VII
and the provisions contained herein.
c. The existing house shall be removed prior to certificate of occupancy.
d. The undeveloped portion of the property shall be seeded with native seed and
maintained free of weeds until such a time as future development occurs on
that portion.
e. The applicant will submit a tree mitigation plan at time of Certificate of Zoning
Compliance(CZC). This mitigation plan shall indicate the total number and
caliper inches of trees proposed for removal and the total number of
replacement trees proposed.
Page 13
Page 98
Item#3.
f. There shall not be direct access to N. Locust Grove Rd.
B. PUBLIC WORKS
1. No proposed changes to public sewer infrastructure has been shown within record. Any
changes or modifications to the public sewer infrastructure shall be reviewed and approved
by Public Works.
2. There are two existing water stubs at the northern boundary that either need to be used or
abandoned per Meridian Public Works Standards.
C. ACHD
hyps://weblink.meridianciU.org_/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=192567&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC
Lty
D. ADA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=l 92349&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCi
iy
IX. FINDINGS
A.Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-511-3E)
Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full
investigation and shall at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation
and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings:
1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan;
Council finds annexation of the subject site with a C-C zoning designation is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan Commercial FL UM designation for this property.
2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically
the purpose statement;
Council finds the proposed office flex building will be consistent with the purpose statement of the
commercial districts in that it will support the purpose of providing for the service needs of the
community, in accordance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan
3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare;
Council finds that the proposed annexation and zoning should not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare. Commission recommends the Council consider any oral or written
testimony that may be provided when determining this finding.
4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any
political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school
districts; and
Council finds that the proposed annexation and zoning will not result in any adverse impact upon
the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site.
5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city
Council finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City.
Page 14
Page 99