Loading...
2020-09-08 Regular WE IDIAN City Council Regular Meeting City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, September 08, 2020 at 6:00 PM Minutes VIRTUAL MEETING INSTRUCTIONS Limited seating is available at City Hall. Consider joining the meeting virtually: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87648895760 To call in: 1-669-900-6833 Webinar ID: 876 4889 5760 ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Mayor Robert E. Simison Councilman Joe Borton Councilman Brad Hoaglun Councilman Treg Bernt Councilwoman Jessica Perreault (6:03pm) Councilman Luke Cavener Councilwoman Liz Strader PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE COMMUNITY INVOCATION ADOPTION OF AGENDA-Adopted Motion to adopt the agenda made by Councilman Bernt, Seconded by Councilman Hoaglun. Voting Yea: Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Bernt, Councilman Cavener, Councilwoman Strader CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] -Approved Motion to approve the consent agenda made by Councilman Bernt, Seconded by Councilman Hoaglun. Voting Yea: Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Bernt, Councilman Cavener, Councilwoman Strader 1. Approve Minutes of the August 25, 2020 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the August 25, 2020 City Council Regular Meeting 3. Bainbridge Subdivision No. 11 Pedestrian Pathway Easement 4. Baraya Subdivision No. 5 Pedestrian Pathway Easement 5. Edgehill Subdivision No. 2 Pedestrian Pathway Easement 6. Jump Creek Subdivision Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 7. Jump Creek Subdivision No. 4 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 8. Rackham Subdivision Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement 9. Shelburne East Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer Easement No. 1 10. Shelburne East Subdivision No. 1 Water Main Easement No. 3 11. Shelburne East Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 2 12. Final Plat for Victory Commons (H-2020-0086) by BVA Development, Located at 130 E.Victory Rd. 13. Final Order for Aegean Estates No. 2 (H-2020-0084) by Becky McKay, Engineering Solutions, LLP, Generally Located South of the Five Mile Creek, East of N. McDermott Rd. 14. Final Order for Brundage Estates (TECC-2020-0001) by LC Development, Generally Located East of S. Linder Rd. Between W. Victory Rd. and W.Amity Rd. 15. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Paramount Point (H-2020-0082) by Brighton Development, Inc., Located at 6357 N. Fox Run Way 16. Revised Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Brody Square (H-2020-0032) by Pinnacle Land Development, LLC, Located on the Northeast and Southeast Corners of N. Black Cat Rd. and W. Daphne St. 17. Revised Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Quartet Northeast (H-2020-0017) and Quartet Southeast (H-2020-0018) by Brighton Development, Located at 4020 & 2430 N. Black Cat Rd. 18. Development Agreement Between the City of Meridian and Compass Public Charter School (Owner) and Bouma USA Management, LLC (Developer) for COMPASS Charter School East Expansion (H-2020-0042) 19. Development Agreement between the City of Meridian and Gem Prep: Meridian North, LLC (Owners) and Bouma, USA (Developer) for Gem Innovation School (H- 2020-0043) 20. Fourth Addendum to Development Agreement Between the City of Meridian and Martin L. Hill &Hill Properties, L.P. (Owner/Developer) for Hill's Century Farm North (H-2020-0080) 21. License and Service Agreement for Budget Software to Questica, Ltd for the Not- To-Exceed amount of$271,112 22. Resolution No. 20-2227: A Resolution Adopting the Fiscal Year 2020 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection Services; Authorizing the Finance Department to Collect Such Fees; and Providing an Effective Date 23. Resolution No. 20-2228: A Resolution Authorizing The Sixth Continuance of a Local Disaster Emergency Declaration and its Terms for an Additional Thirty (30) Days; Authorizing the Continued Immediate Expenditure of Public Money to Safeguard Life, Health and Property; and Providing an Effective Date 24. AP Invoices for Payment- 09-09-20 - $386,460.25 ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] PUBLIC FORUM - Future Meeting Topics The public are invited to sign up prior to the start of the meeting to address their elected officials regarding matters of general interest or concern of public matters. This time is reserved for general topics and not specific to an active land use/development application. By law, no decisions can be made on topics presented under this public commentsection. However, the City Council may request that the topic be added to a future meeting agenda for a more detailed discussion or action. The Mayor may also direct staff to further assistyou in resolving the matter following the meeting. ACTION ITEMS Public Hearings related to land use applications follow this process:Once the hearing is opened, City Staff will present their analysis of the application. Following this, the applicant will be allowed up to 15 minutes to present their application. Following any questions that may be asked by Council, members of the public are allowed up to 3 minutes each to address Council regarding the application. If a person is representing a Homeowner's Association, indicated by a show of hands, they may be allowed up to 10 minutes, provided those they are representing are yielding their time. Following all public testimony, the applicant is allowed an additional 10 minutes to respond to comments. Council may ask additional questions, and then close the public hearing. Once the hearing is closed, not further testimony will be heard. City Council may move to continue the item to a future meeting or may vote to approve or deny the item with or without changes presented. The Mayor is not a member of the City Council and pursuant to Idaho Code does not vote on public hearing items, unless to break a tie-vote. 25. Public Hearing for 1625 E. Bentley Drive (H-2020-0078) by Clint Hansen of Land Solutions, Located at 1625 E. Bentley Dr. -Approved A. Request: Annexation of 1.03 acres of land with the C-C zoning district. Motion to approve made by Councilman Borton, Seconded by Councilman Hoaglun. Voting Yea: Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Bernt, Councilwoman Perreault, Councilman Cavener, Councilwoman Strader DEPARTMENT/COMMISSION REPORTS [Action Item] 26. Mayor's Office: Presentation and Discussion of City Survey Results ORDINANCES [Action Item] 27. Ordinance No. 20-1895: An Ordinance (H-2020-0042 - Compass Charter School East Expansion) for Annexation of a Parcel of Land Within the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, as Described in Attachment"A" and Annexing Certain Lands and Territory, Situated in Ada County, Idaho, and Adjacent and Contiguous to the Corporate Limits of the City of Meridian as Requested by the City of Meridian; Establishing and Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification of 10.501 Acres of Land From RUT to R-15 (Medium-High Density Residential) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code; Providing That Copies of This Ordinance Shall be Filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, And the Idaho State Tax Commission, as Required by Law; and Providing for a Summary of the Ordinance; and Providing for a Waiver of the Reading Rules; and Providing an Effective Date - Approved Motion to adopt made by Councilwoman Perreault, Seconded by Councilwoman Strader. Voting Yea: Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Bernt, Councilwoman Perreault, Councilman Cavener, Councilwoman Strader 28. Ordinance No. 20-1894: An Ordinance (H-2020-0043 - Gem Innovation School) for Annexation of a Parcel of Land Within The Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 28, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,Ada County, Idaho, as Described in Attachment"A" and Annexing Certain Lands and Territory, Situated in Ada County, Idaho, and Adjacent and Contiguous to the Corporate Limits of the City of Meridian as Requested by the City of Meridian; Establishing and Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification of 8.00 Acres of Land from RUT to R-15 (Medium-High Density Residential) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code; Providing That Copies of This Ordinance Shall be Filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as Required by Law; and Providing for a Summary of the Ordinance; and Providing for a Waiver of the Reading Rules; and Providing an Effective Date -Approved Motion to adopt made by Councilwoman Perreault, Seconded by Councilman Cavener. Voting Yea: Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Bernt, Councilwoman Perreault, Councilman Cavener, Councilwoman Strader FUTURE MEETING TOPICS EXECUTIVE SESSION 29. Per Idaho Code 74-206A(1)(a) To deliberate on a labor contract offer or to formulate a counteroffer; and (f) To communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending litigation, or controversies not yet being litigated but imminently likely to be litigated. Motion to enter Executive Session made by Councilman Bernt, Seconded by Councilman Hoaglun. Voting Yea: Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Bernt, Councilwoman Perreault, Councilman Cavener, Councilwoman Strader Entered Executive Session at 7:41 pm Exited Executive Session at 8:27pm ADJOURNMENT 8:27 pm Meridian City Council September 8, 2020. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:02 p.m., Tuesday, September 8, 2020, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Joe Borton, Luke Cavener, Treg Bernt, Jessica Perreault, Brad Hoaglun and Liz Strader. Also present: Chris Johnson, Bill Nary, Alan Tiefenbach, Jeff Brown, Joe Bongiorno and Dean Willis. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE: Liz Strader _X_ Joe Borton _X_ Brad Hoaglun _X_Treg Bernt X Jessica Perreault _X Luke Cavener _X_ Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Okay. Council, I will go ahead and call this meeting to order. For the record it is Tuesday, September 8th. It's 6:02 p.m. We will begin tonight's meeting with roll call attendance. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Simison: Next item on the agenda is the Pledge of Allegiance. If you will all rise and, please, join us in the Pledge. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) COMMUNITY INVOCATION Simison: I do not see anyone here for the community invocation at this point in time. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Simison: So, with that we will move on to the next item, which is adoption of the agenda. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I move that we adopt the agenda as published. Hoaglun: Second the motion. Page 4 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page 2- — Simison: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as published. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it and the agenda is adopted. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] 1. Approve Minutes of the August 25, 2020 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the August 25, 2020 City Council Regular Meeting 3. Bainbridge Subdivision No. 11 Pedestrian Pathway Easement 4. Baraya Subdivision No. 5 Pedestrian Pathway Easement 5. Edgehill Subdivision No. 2 Pedestrian Pathway Easement 6. Jump Creek Subdivision Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 7. Jump Creek Subdivision No. 4 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 8. Rackham Subdivision Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement 9. Shelburne East Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer Easement No. 1 10. Shelburne East Subdivision No. 1 Water Main Easement No. 3 11. Shelburne East Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 2 12. Final Plat for Victory Commons (H-2020-0086) by BVA Development, Located at 130 E. Victory Rd. 13. Final Order for Aegean Estates No. 2 (H-2020-0084) by Becky McKay, Engineering Solutions, LLP, Generally Located South of the Five Mile Creek, East of N. McDermott Rd. 14. Final Order for Brundage Estates (TECC-2020-0001) by LC Development, Generally Located East of S. Linder Rd. Between W. Victory Rd. and W. Amity Rd. 15. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Paramount Point (H-2020- 0082) by Brighton Development, Inc., Located at 6357 N. Fox Run Way Page 5 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page 3 of 36 16. Revised Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Brody Square (H- 2020-0032) by Pinnacle Land Development, LLC, Located on the Northeast and Southeast Corners of N. Black Cat Rd. and W. Daphne St. 17. Revised Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Quartet Northeast (H-2020-0017) and Quartet Southeast (H-2020-0018) by Brighton Development, Located at 4020 & 2430 N. Black Cat Rd. 18. Development Agreement Between the City of Meridian and Compass Public Charter School (Owner) and Bouma USA Management, LLC (Developer) for COMPASS Charter School East Expansion (H-2020- 0042) 19. Development Agreement between the City of Meridian and Gem Prep: Meridian North, LLC (Owners) and Bouma, USA (Developer) for Gem Innovation School (H-2020-0043) 20. Fourth Addendum to Development Agreement Between the City of Meridian and Martin L. Hill & Hill Properties, L.P. (Owner/Developer) for Hill's Century Farm North (H-2020-0080) 21. License and Service Agreement for Budget Software to Questica, Ltd for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $271,112 22. Resolution No. 20-2227: A Resolution Adopting the Fiscal Year 2020 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection Services; Authorizing the Finance Department to Collect Such Fees; and Providing an Effective Date 23. Resolution No. 20-2228: A Resolution Authorizing The Sixth Continuance of a Local Disaster Emergency Declaration and its Terms for an Additional Thirty (30) Days; Authorizing the Continued Immediate Expenditure of Public Money to Safeguard Life, Health and Property; and Providing an Effective Date 24. AP Invoices for Payment - 09-09-20 - $386,460.25 Johnson: Mr. Mayor, just wanted to let you know Council Woman Perreault has joined us. Simison: Okay. Thank you. For the record 6:03. Next item on the agenda is the Consent Agenda. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Page 6 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page 4- — Bernt: I move that we approve the Consent Agenda, for the Mayor to sign and for the Clerk to attest. Hoaglun: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it and the agenda is -- or the Consent Agenda item is approved. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] Simison: There were no items moved from the Consent Agenda. PUBLIC FORUM — Future Meeting Topics Simison: Mr. Clerk, did we have anyone signed up under public forum? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, we do have one sign up. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Bernt: Mr. Mayor, it sounds like -- sorry to interrupt, Mayor. You're going in and out. We can't hear you consistently. Simison: Okay. Johnson: Mr. Mayor, we had one sign up. Austin Walkins. Simison: Okay. Johnson: It looks like he may not be here, but the discussion topic says thank you for clean energy resolution and pursuing an electric fire truck. Simison: I can tell you Mr. Walkins is in the attendee room. Johnson: My apologies, Mr. Walkins. I will fix that right now. Mr. Walkins, if you can hear me, you are going to be able to unmute yourself in two or three seconds. Simison: And if you would state your name and address for the record and you will be recognized for 30 -- or three minutes. Walkins: Hi. My name is Austin Walkins. I -- can everyone hear me okay? Perfect. Thank you. Yeah. I don't want to take too much of your time. So, I'm here on behalf of my organization, the Idaho Conservation League and I really just wanted to thank you all Page 7 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page 5 of 36 for-- I watched the recording of last week's meeting where you talked about the resolution supporting Idaho Power's commitment to clean energy and, then, there was the discussion around the electric fire truck and this is all really exciting news. ICL, we have about 30,000 members. A lot of them live within the Treasure Valley, Boise, Meridian area and we are really excited to share the initiatives that all the cities are doing, but firstly exciting to share this with some of our Meridian folks and just wanted to thank you all for doing it and really appreciate it. Also just to introduce myself, put a face to the name. You know, if there is ever anything we can do to help out with some of the stuff you guys are working on, we are always more than happy to -- to help out and help push these initiatives. So, with that I'm happy to answer any questions if folks have them or I can let you get on to your business as well. But I really appreciate the time to talk today. Thank you. Simison: Thank you, Austin. This is not a time for Q&A, but we appreciate the conversation and the information provided. All right. If there is -- if that was our last item, Mr. Clerk. Johnson: Yes. That was the only sign in. ACTION ITEMS 25. Public Hearing for 1625 E. Bentley Drive (H-2020-0078) by Clint Hansen of Land Solutions, Located at 1625 E. Bentley Dr. A. Request: Annexation of 1.03 acres of land with the C-C zoning district. Simison: Okay. Then with that we will move on to the action part of our agenda. Item 25 is a public hearing for 1625 East Bentley Drive, H-2020-0078. I will open this public hearing with staff comment from Alan. Tiefenbach: Good evening, Council, Mr. Mayor. Alan Tiefenbach, associate planner with the City of Meridian. Good evening. This is a proposal for an annexation and a zoning to allow a 4,800 square foot office building and a commercial lot. Here are the zoning maps, the future land use map, and the aerial. The property is currently within the unincorporated Ada county, zoned RUT. You can see here on our future land use map that this property is recommended for commercial uses and this is an aerial map. As I talk I have put together this sitemap to sort of help describe this. So, again, the subject property is at the southeast quadrant of South Locust Grove and East Bentley Drive. It presently contains a 2,100 square foot house, which is what you see here. South Truss Place and East Bentley from South Locust is the only way in and out of this property. So, all of have these are kind of ending cul-de-sacs and dead ends. This is the only way in and out. There is an unused spur of East Bentley that runs along the north property line and terminates just before South Locust Grove. So, this here is kind of this unused spur. Immediately to the north, south and east of this property is low density residential, although over to the west on the other side of South Locust Grove is highly intensive Page 8 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page 6 of 36 nonresidential uses. This includes the Renaissance High School and the Idaho College of Osteopathic -- Osteopathic Medicine, which is across South Locust Grove. If you go to the south you have pretty intense commercial uses, such as a movie theater, some gas stations, your typical commercial and retail. As I mentioned, the Comprehensive Plan recommends the subject property for commercial uses and it recommends mixed use on -- to the east of this property. This is to sort of provide a transition for the residential areas to more of a nonresidential area and, then, to eventually the higher intensity commercial. Sidewalks already exist on this side of South Locust here, although the applicant will be required to install a 25 foot landscape buffer. I have provided some pictures to help describe this a little better. So, here is the site looking down South Locust Grove to the south and this is the subject property here. The adjacent property is over here. That's right across the street to the east of this and we are looking down Bentley right now and this right here is that stub street that I was talking about, sort of a no man's land and, again, this here is the subject property. So, the business proposed with this annexation is presently located at 213 East 5th Avenue in Meridian in a 3,800 square foot building. They share space with several other tenants. The existing business leases about 1 ,300 square foot of available space. The applicant stated the size and configuration of the present building does not lend itself to the existing operations and there is no use for -- or no room for expansion. The applicant intends to construct and own a larger building designed for these particular operations, which is an engineering and a survey firm. They -- again, they want to be able to have a larger building that's built for the particular operation. It would allow more flexibility and workspaces. As single family residential is not allowed in the C-C zone district, they would have to remove this existing house as part of a condition -- of the conditional use. In addition to the --this is the original building that they wanted to build and this is that 1 ,400 square feet. In addition to this building, there was some discussion from the applicant to eventually build a second commercial building to the north. We have worked with the applicant a bit to get a site plan that is the most efficient design for this, so the parking would be wrapped in the middle, buildings are pushed closer to South Locust Grove, so you are looking -- it's got more of a view of the buildings than of the parking. The applicant is also -- in addition to the site plan, the applicant has also provided elevations, which you see to the east. Now, these are only conceptual. Staff has already expressed -- we do have some concerns with the -- the types of materials that are being proposed with these. They are showing sort of -- more of a metal and metal can't be allowed as a primary material per our architectural standards manual, but this at least sort of describes what they are going to look like in general. I think it's important to mention that these buildings are shown as one story. If they develop this site they will have to -- part of the requirement will be a development agreement as part of the annexation and if you look at one of the conditions of approval it talks about that the site and the elevations will generally conform with what is being shown in the hearing. So, if they are showing a one story building they can't build a five story building or do something that's vastly different than what's being applied to here tonight for you. One of the concerns that staff had was this area. Eventually -- before they can build this building -- before they can develop the lot, as I said, they are going to have to remove this house here to the north. When they remove this house -- this house, staff had concerns with this sort of sitting empty and vacant and becoming overgrown and sort of a no man's land. So, one of our requirements is that the applicant will have to seed this -- this Page 9 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page , of 36 particular area and they will have to maintain this until such time as they build this second property. This applicant was heard at the August 8th, 2020, P&Z meeting. Nobody showed up to testify on this, but we have received several letters. We received -- we received the one before the Planning Commission hearing and we have received several more. Most of the concerns are related to traffic. That there -- there has been some opposition to the -- to the Comprehensive Plan recommendations for commercial in this area. There has been some concern about what the potential height of these buildings are and the potential use and -- and I think I did mention that the -- the use at hand right now -- the reason why the applicant is -- is in this process is that they want to move their -- their building, which right now is an engineering firm, so we are talking about -- I think they said 12 employees, your typical 8:00 to 5:00 type jobs. It's a -- it's a pretty low intensity commercial, professional type office. With that the Planning Commission recommended approval, as does staff recommends approval with the conditions as are listed in the staff report. Simison: Thank you, Alan. Council, any questions for staff at this point? Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I understand, Alan, that the applicant will be required to install a 25 foot landscape buffer along South Locust Grove. I was just curious some of the concerns expressed in the letter talked about having landscaping and access points, curb, gutter, sidewalk on Truss. Is that -- what's going to be required for Truss? Tiefenbach: Yes, sir. So, the applicant will be required -- so, the sidewalk and the curb and gutter already exist right now on South Locust Grove. They don't have the landscape, so they will have to apply a 25 foot landscape buffer and also along Truss -- and this is one of the requirements of ACHD, they are going to have to do a ten foot buffer, a curb and gutter and sidewalk along South Truss Place as well. They will also have to do a 25 foot wide buffer to the south directly adjacent to the residential. Hoaglun: Okay. Thank you, Alan. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Thank you,Alan. I guess the one thing I would like to understand -- I understand they are building one building right now and we are being asked to approve this annexation. What future approvals would happen before a second building is built? Would that just be an administrative matter? There is a lot of sensitivity about the future use given the neighbors' concern. Page 10 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page 8- — Tiefenbach: That -- that is correct. If this were approved now, then, the second building, as long as they stayed within what the -- the requirements of the UDC are in the zone district, it would be a certificate of zoning compliance, which is an administrative process. Again, they would have to generally follow the development agreement. So, they couldn't get a one story building approved and, then, build a five story building and their -- their site would have to generally conform with the site plan that you are looking at this evening as a Council person. The use -- I would have to turn that to the applicant. I'm not sure if they know at this point what use. My understanding when talking to them is they are looking at some kind of professional office type uses. Bongiorno: Mr. Mayor? Simison: One second, Deputy Chief. Council, any further questions for staff at this time? Deputy Chief. Bongiorno: Sorry, Mayor and City Council. Alan, just a quick comment. I have never seen the site plan before. It doesn't meet the fire code. So, we need to make sure that gets addressed before it gets approved. Tiefenbach: Of course. That would come to you, Mr. Bongiorno. It's-- it's very conceptual at this point. So, I wouldn't be surprised if it doesn't meet all the fire code. We would just make sure that generally the configuration and the orientation and the parking complied with this. Simison: Okay. Council, any questions for the Deputy Chief based on that comment? Okay. Then is the applicant here with us? If you would like to come forward and be recognized for 15 minutes. Just state your name and address. Are we doing it here, Chris, or in the room? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, we can do that at the podium, unless we run into trouble. Simison: Okay. All right. Hansen: My name is Clint Hansen. 231 East 5th Street in Meridian, Idaho. We are proposing this for a flex space office space for -- we do land surveying, which is hand in hand with civil engineering. So, we would need the garage spaces for field crews, survey trucks, and stuff and, then, the office space for our drafting and more technical things that we do. It's ideal for us to do this, because we have -- we have looked, you know, in the area. We would really like to stay in Meridian. We have looked in the area for a lot of flex space in the past and just haven't found much that's conducive to our type of business. So, we finally decided to try to purchase property and build something that would -- would be good for us and splitting the lot will allow us to recoup some of the cost of the purchase of the property. So, for the north lot we are not -- we are not sure what the use will be, but like Alan said, it would be conducive to the development agreement that we will have to agree upon business use and conducive to the C-C zoning that we are proposing. We do -- basically, yeah, just day-to-day, 8.00 to 5.00 or, you know, 6.00 to 3.00 type hours Page 11 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page 9 of 36 for our guys. We don't have guys coming and going on all day and night and weekends we are usually closed. So, that's pretty conducive to the neighborhood. When we had our neighborhood meeting they expressed a lot of concern, mainly just with the Comprehensive Plan that the city has, not necessarily towards our business. They weren't opposed to what we were doing. If we didn't have to go through the annexation process. They just don't want -- or don't like the annexation coming closer and closer to their area I think it was their concern. Do you have any questions for us regarding this? Like I said, it was -- or Alan said, it's really conceptual at this point, but we are -- this is what we have landed on for -- for now to -- what -- what the city would like to see with it closer to Locust Grove and the orientations and everything. But we will have to certainly review for the fire code if we have to do a turnaround or what we need to do --to do there, so -- that wasn't part of our process yet, so -- Simison: Council, any questions for the applicant? Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Hoaglun: Mr. Hansen, I have a quick question. This is a flex space. You do have trucks coming in and out. Approximately how many trucks and vehicles that people will commute in are going to be at this -- at this office? Hansen: We plan for -- for three field trucks and we have presently ten employees. So, there is usually three or four of us that are at the office all day and the rest of them are out in the field just -- you know, leave in the morning and come back in the afternoon and are done for the day. Hoaglun: Thank you. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Thank you, Clint, for your presentation. I wanted to just get clarity. Is the intention that each of these facilities or each of these businesses just be one individual single user? There is not an intention that it will be divided into multiple types of businesses? Hansen: Correct. For this -- the building that we are proposing on the south will just be our business and not any lease space or anything, just us occupying the whole thing. And, then, if we either sell the lot to the north or develop the lot to the north, we are not sure if it would be like a multi-use commercial or -- or what it would be at this point. We don't -- we don't have that nailed down yet. Page 12 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page ——— Simison: Any further questions for the applicant? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I guess a clarifying question. In your testimony, sir, you indicated, you know -- and I think you touched on this at Planning and Zoning about 8:00 to 6:00, 6:00 to 3:00, maybe, you know, ended the week early on Friday. Can you share for the Council kind of like what that use would be? My -- my assumption is that use is happening within the -- the four walls of your building. I am somewhat sensitive to working at 6:00 a.m. and creating a noise or disturbance for -- for your neighbors. So, if you could just kind of articulate what that use would be it be helpful for me as well. Hansen: Okay. Yeah. Typically for the normal day that -- you know, the ones that are arriving at 6:00 are just trying to get out and do the field work before it gets too hot. So, that would be summer hours and they just come and upload information into their survey equipment, the data collectors and stuff, and just load the trucks up and leave. So, we are not doing a lot of maintenance or any kind of noise type stuff, it would just be parking, going in the office, loading the stuff up and, then, driving away and same when they return, they just come and park and, then, download the stuff into the computers and, then, leave for the day as well. Simison: All right. Thank you very much. Hansen: Thank you. Simison: This is a public hearing. Mr. Clerk, do we have anyone that's signed up to testify on this item? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, we only had one online sign in and they didn't indicate wishing to testify, but they are in the meeting. So, I would say when you ask if there is anyone else they can choose. Simison: Yes. So, if -- if you would like to testify on this item you can, please, come forward and testify. If you are online and would like to provide testimony if you can just use the raise your hand function at the bottom of Zoom and we can bring you in to testify on this application. Seeing no one who would like to testify, I would ask the applicant if they would like to make any final remarks on this application? Okay. I'm seeing no requests. So, Council, I'm going to go ahead and throw it back over to any further conversation or actions on this item? And I guess the one question I would have for Alan is what is the long-term intention -- if you could go back a couple slides -- with the -- with the road -- kind of -- kind of -- that one is a great example. Is that road right now on the property intend to be vacated and that segment between there and the proposed roundabout to be developed or what is intended with that section of the property in this area? What's going to be done? Page 13 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page 11 —— Tiefenbach: Sir, are you talking about this area here? Simison: Yes. And north up to the roadway. Tiefenbach: So, what we do know is that ACHD is working on putting in a roundabout here. I do not believe that they are going to widen Bentley anymore than it already is. We have talked to the applicant about whether or not they wanted to vacate this portion. We talked to ACHD about that. ACHD did not really express any concerns whether or not it was vacated. My understanding is the applicant at this time doesn't want to vacate it. Certainly if somebody -- we actually even approached them about whether they wanted to annex the entire thing and just take the whole property, but they weren't interested and ACHD didn't express any concerns either. So, at this point we don't know what's going to happen with that northern road. All we know is that it won't be used for the access for this particular one. The access is going to come in off of Truss Place from the east -- or, sorry, from the east side of the property. Simison: I want to mention that, you know, not knowing where the Deputy Chief and the fire code issues go, but if you are going to put two buildings on this site with a drive through space, it would seem a lot more practical to orient the buildings to be parallel with Locust Grove in this location, rather than horizontal and go through that vacation for the other property. That's just my non-planner looking at what this is going to do and with that roundabout being proposed in that location I'm really -- I don't know or have any concept for what that's going to do to this property. I didn't realize there was a roundabout that was proposed here, but it makes it really weird thinking about where and how this eventually gets access under this proposal. Tiefenbach: I do know with some -- some discussion that occurred a little later this afternoon that there has never been any concern for any other road to be punched in directly to South Locust Grove. The access to this area is going to continue to occur from where it is now. They are not going to be providing another road into Locust Grove. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Borton: On that point is there cross-access required to the property to the north from this parcel? Tiefenbach: There will be. At this point we are just getting the annexation and the rezoning, but when the applicant comes in to do a CZC that will be one of the requirements, is that they will have to provide access to the northern property. Borton: Okay. And, Mr. Mayor, a follow up. Page 14 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page ——— Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: To the Mayor's point on the layout and design, I think just whatever might facilitate the only access, if anything goes on the north, will be through the cross-access on this parcel, so the parking and layout hopefully can facilitate that, because there is no other way to get to that parcel long term. It doesn't look like it at least. Tiefenbach: Two accesses on the east side, both coming off of South Truss Place. I do not believe that there is any proposal to do the access to the no man's land road. Borton: Right. But my point being that this would need to facilitate cross-access whether it's drive aisle or some mechanism to allow the northern parcel to be utilized. Tiefenbach: That is correct. When they came -- when they -- when they -- so right now the way that it works is there is one large lot and, then, there is a teeny tiny little -- I don't want to call it a spite strip, but there is a -- sort of a second little teeny piece. When they come in to do the boundary alignment adjustment, which would divide these into two pieces, part of that -- that's technically a plat process and part of that plat process would be requiring them to actually provide a cross-access easement. They would have to do that, so when they sell -- and when they sell off that lot in the future that both people will be able to have the same -- same access to either a lot. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Maybe a follow up for Alan. So, if we approve the annexation now, you know, would the development agreement give us any type of assurance that the second building would be a professional office or as to what types of use would --would be allowed there? I guess I'm just -- I'm concerned about the potential for a heavier use that might not be appropriate and we only have one bite at the apple with the annexation. Tiefenbach: Mr. Mayor, Council Person Strader, there is not right now a restriction on that being only professional office, but certainly that is within your purview to add that to the development agreement if that is your desire. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: I apologize, I had an interaction here at my home and I did have an additional question for the applicant and since we haven't closed the public hearing I wanted to request if I might be able to ask that question. Simison: Absolutely. If the applicant would like to come back forward. Page 15 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page ——— Perreault: Thank you very much. You had mentioned the public testimony that we received in writing. I have read through that as well and I was hoping that you could comment on some of the -- the concerns by the neighbors about pedestrian safety along Truss and there being a lot of people who walk and -- and children who bike on that street from the residents that are to the east. I thought maybe you could help give some reassurance about-- I know we talked about how many vehicles are entering and leaving, but, you know, I understand -- I understand the concern about that being a different capacity of vehicle coming and going than there would be a single residence there. I mean if you -- even if you have -- let's say 20 employees total, if you have two businesses there, just as an example, and still quite a bit more traffic than just a single home that's there. So, if you wouldn't mind sharing your thoughts on that. Hansen: Yes. Certainly. Truss Place currently just goes south to a dead end cul-de-sac, so there is not a -- I mean not a lot of traffic as far as pedestrian traffic that I could imagine, but ACHD is going to require us to put in sidewalk on the -- on our side and additional landscape buffer. So, they will have, you know, sidewalk there, so there they can walk on the sidewalk instead of in the road and, plus, we will have 25 feet from the current centerline to the -- to the right of way. So, we will be -- Truss will be a little bit wider and safer. The edge of pavement where it is currently we will be about the lip of the gutter for our new gutter line and, then, the sidewalk will be a five foot sidewalk behind that. So, it will be about seven additional feet of sidewalk and curb and gutter that they will have access for -- to be on that portion of the property to -- for pedestrian traffic. Does that answer your question? Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Mostly. I know -- I know you can't project exactly what that pedestrian traffic is going to look like, but just -- this is a unique -- this is a unique location and I know that the Comprehensive Plan shows this as C-C, but it is -- it's just a -- an interesting situation when you -- when you put this type of business and that large of a building into an entirely residential place and so, yeah, I -- I -- I don't have anymore questions. Trying to just gather my thoughts about it. Thank you. Simison: Okay. Thank you. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: While you are here I guess I will ask you to comment on -- Council Woman Strader made a reference to possibly limiting some of the uses for the property to the retail office uses only within a DA. Is that something that you have any comments on? Page 16 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page —of 36 Hansen: Well, for us personally we would like to keep, you know, that northern lot as open as we can for potential development and -- and purchase, because, ideally, we would like to -- to sell it if we can and that gives whoever would come in to develop that the option to -- to meet with the city and develop it, you know, and have a lot of different options than just strictly professional or-- I mean with the development agreement we are already limiting a lot of the potential for this property that I know the city has -- in talking with development services and the city -- the planners, they have a lot of -- I mean they really are excited about this property and becoming a really nice property for the surrounding area and development. So, I guess -- I mean we are trying to be as conducive as we can to the requests made already for the layout and everything. This is -- originally -- this is like the third layout we have come up with for -- for this after working with the planning. Originally we didn't have it laid out like this at all, but we are trying to do what we can to be conducive to what the city wants and that's what to do. Borton: So -- Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: Here is -- here is the rub on that. I don't disagree. I -- you know. And the challenge becomes with a --with this type of zoning, which could allow some more intense uses. The city could be in a situation where they maybe take pause and say for that type of commercial use I don't know if this annexation is appropriate. I don't think that's maybe the best transition, even though it -- it could be zoned for that. So, this is really the one and only time that the city has to -- if it's going to approve a zoning and bring this in that this is the only opportunity to constrict those uses within that C-G zone. I think that's why you are getting the question and perhaps some hesitancy if there is any scenario where the parcel to the north could be used for something much more intense in scale or more traffic, for example, then, we get -- we grow in our concern for the transition issues and compatibility with the neighborhood, so -- Hansen: Right. Borton: -- I think that's why the middle ground might be -- if this goes forward let's ensure that we have got some limitations on the scale of what might occur in use in intensity. Hansen: Uh-huh. Borton: So, is that-- in light of that explanation and concern does it still seem like --would you be able to agree to constrict those uses in the north or are you adamant that it needs to be potentially anything and everything to the north? Hansen: Well, I don't think it needs to be anything and everything. I think we are already constricted already with this layout. My understanding is it has to be pretty much conceptual with the layout that we have. So, I don't know what other uses would be a potential problem with the C-C zone with this type of layout. The building would have to certainly conform with this -- with this layout and other than professional use I don't know Page 17 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page ——— what else -- what use would be a concern that would fit this conceptual layout I guess. I mean to say only strictly professional, I would have to look and see what --what that really involves to be only strictly professional and that -- again, that's putting a huge limitation on the property for potential development that the C-C zone already has a lot of limitations already and so is this conceptual layout. So, I guess I would have to meet with the city and discuss that further I guess. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: Maybe for -- to clarify the example. And, Alan or Mr. Nary, you guys can -- can comment. If, for example, of a restaurant use wanted to go in there, which is a much different type of user. I don't know if there is a good example of the unanticipated scenario where an end user comes and offers an ungodly sum and you want to sell and they can use it now in a way that we didn't envision. Simison: Gyro Shack. Borton: Gyro Shack. Something like that; right? And it's not your fault, you're gone, but in the scenario that it's sold to somebody that we don't want to miss that opportunity. I think that's where the question came from. So, I don't know if there is an example of kind of a parade of horribles that could occur. Nary: Well, Mr. Mayor, Members of Council, Council Member Borton, I mean what's not uncommon of the use of flex space in Meridian at least has seen -- besides storage and some of the industrial places that we have like along Franklin -- is dance studios and gymnastics academies and those tend to have a lot more intensive use of traffic and it's fairly common. There is -- Danik Gym is right down the street. There is -- Meridian Gymnastics Academy is also down Locust Grove as well. So, I mean that's a -- that's not an uncommon use of that large of a flex space is that type of thing, so -- that would have -- probably have more of an impact on the neighborhood because of traffic. Hansen: Our building to the south is -- I mean going to be occupied just by our company. We -- I mean I will be there until I retire. I'm -- you know, for 20 years at least. So, as far as on the north, yeah, I guess that could be a potential problem if it was flex space and it's not desirable for -- is what the city would want in that use I guess. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: Is there a -- and maybe this is a question for Mr. Nary. Is there a way in which we can put assurances in the development agreement -- not necessarily limiting what goes in there, but moving what may or may not go in the future? Page 18 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page 16 of 36 Nary: Mr. Mayor, Members of Council, certainly as Council Member Borton stated -- I mean this is the opportunity to limit the types of uses on that property that you would require they had to come back for an amendment to the development agreement to put that in. So, whether you -- I don't know that you want to get too granular in that, but certainly limiting the type to whatever type of uses that you don't want, like restaurants or if you don't want gymnastic studios there, without at least another conversation with the Council in the future if that's -- again, it's kind of hard to envision all the potentials that could impact. I don't know with a roundabout there at some point in the future if that will also have an impact on the type of businesses that want to locate there as well, but -- but, yeah, this would be your opportunity now at the development agreement stage. Bernt: Well, I -- Mr. Mayor, follow up, please. Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I totally get that and I understand how important this could be, but my question to you is instead of laying out all of the things that we want or potentially want at this space, could we just say, you know, a future Council would have to approve -- or whoever buys that lot from this gentleman would have to come to Council to get -- you know, for our approval I guess is what I'm saying. Nary: Mr. Mayor, Members of Council, Council Member Bernt, yes, I mean certainly can limit the uses and exclude uses that are allowed in a C-C zone and, then, require a development agreement amendment to allow it in the future. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: I think that's kind of where the question started was if -- for the purpose of proceeding today it may be limited and a future user who comes in and wants to do something that's principally permitted in a C-C zone, but the Council wants to require that future user to come and ask to amend the DA to allow that use, because that would be the one time where -- and that future Council could take a look and say, oh, that makes sense or maybe it doesn't. That -- so, that might be the -- the way that allows you to proceed, but also gives that future user, you know, a chance to come to the -- to the electeds and make a request to expand that restriction. Hansen: Yeah. That certainly makes sense to me. Borton: Okay. Simison: Yes, Alan. Tiefenbach: Mr. Mayor, from what I'm hearing in general it sounds like what you are doing is suggesting that you would be allowing office uses by right, but anything else would be Page 19 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page ,, —— subject to a conditional use. The only drawback with that is that conditional uses go to the Planning Commission for approval, not the City Council. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: I think the idea might be that the DA would limit it and, then, it would be a DA modification back to Council to expand that use in order to do -- because you are exactly right, in order to allow this body to make that future review -- Tiefenbach: Correct. Borton: Correct? Okay. Tiefenbach: Correct. Yeah. It would either -- if -- if -- yeah. Correct. It would either be a conditional use permit or be a requirement of a DA where you would have to do a modification. If you did a modification of the DA, then, it would have to go to a neighborhood meeting as well. Borton: Okay. Thanks. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I also have a question for Deputy Chief Bongiorno and maybe the applicant can answer some of his questions. You mentioned earlier that it isn't -- this project doesn't meet code. Are there certain specifics that he could elaborate to help us understand what's missing or what needs to change? Bongiorno: Yeah. Mr. Mayor and Council Member Bernt, it's an easy fix. It just -- the driveway is too long. It just needs to turn around and so they can just make a circle drive out of it and it will be fine. Make a horseshoe out of it or something. Right now as it sits it's more than 150 feet deep. So, we would have to back all the way out of that and so they can just fix the parking lot layout. If the Mayor is looking at rearranging the building locations, then, that would -- that would fix it. It's a simple fix. Hansen: And we have more than adequate parking that we could eliminate some of those spaces to do a horseshoe as well. Simison: Council, any further questions or comments? Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Page 20 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page 18 of 36 Borton: Just a closing comment. I appreciate your concerns. I know we all -- we also appreciate your desire to stay in Meridian. For having your business here and there is a lot of hoops to jump through to try and make that happen. So, thank you for--for sticking with us and being patient through this process and I think it sounds like there is some common ground on a way -- that this project can go forward and be successful. One of the things that I think that makes it appealing is the type of use you are doing in the south portion of this is a lower intense, lower traffic -- it seems to fit here better as a type of transition and so the -- the desire to limit it via a condition to office on the north tries to capture that same good thing that you are doing with your--with your business relocation. So, much appreciated. Hansen: All right. Thank you. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: I don't know if this is a question for staff, I assume it would be, but let's say at some point in time they decided to sell their property and another user came in and wanted to divide that space, I just have a lot of concerns about, you know, the possibility of that almost 5,000 square foot building now becoming a space for multiple businesses. Is the DA limiting that to an individual user or what's -- is there anything we can do to make sure that that doesn't get converted into three different flex spaces and, then, now you have multiple businesses in here and it becomes sort of a small business park, instead of individual users? Tiefenbach: Council Person, at this point there is nothing in the DA that limits it to just one user for either one of the buildings. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Borton: Question for Alan for Land Solutions are buildings 4,835 square feet and the -- what is the required parking -- number of parking spaces for that? Tiefenbach: It's one per 500. So, one parking space for every 500 square feet. They are significantly over. I think -- I think we came up with it being ten parking spaces for each building and I think they have 17 for each building. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, a follow up. Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Just a comment on that. I think that might be the limiting factor is how much -- if there is a change in the future I would like to think Mr. Hansen will be there for a very Page 21 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page 19 of 36 long time and be very successful, but parking --you know, if someone wanted to construct a two story or three story building on the north side, for example, parking may limit that. So, we do -- we do have some built-in constraints there for any massive structure that -- that might be proposed down the road and -- and same for -- for the Land Solutions building, if that ever were to be sold, as long as it can be subdivided, but as long as there is enough parking for that, you know, you can have three offices, instead of one, but that's my thinking on that. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: To that end is there a possibility that that property to the north could be purchased and converted into parking? I don't know who -- I thought I had read that ACHD owned that piece, but -- Hansen: I can comment on the owner to the north. The owner to the north is Sydney Blackman. She is on the other side of that vacated right of way there and she's just held onto the piece and ACHD -- they kind of divided around her with the new orientation of Bentley and removed her house and so she had to move, but she's held onto the property for future potential, you know, sale for her. So, ACHD only -- still owns that 55 foot strip there is all. So, her access is off of Bentley. They have a curb cut coming off of Bentley for access for -- for her property there and we -- to comment on the vacation of Bentley, it just isn't conducive for us to try to vacate that where power lines and all the utilities that are in there -- it would just be encumbered by easements anyways if we tried to vacate it. So, that's why we chose not to include it in our application for the vacation, because it's just -- it would be encumbered by Idaho Power easement with the overhead power lines that are running through there right now. Simison: So, Council, I -- as we head into this next phase I think this is why it -- even simple in-fill projects create challenges with transition and everything else, so that's why in-fill is a little harder, but, you know, from my perspective I don't think anyone --you know, despite -- we did look at the changes to the comp plan. Having a residence next to this road does not make sense. Commercial does make more sense. Business. I am concerned long term about the impacts of the roundabout on these properties, access, those elements. I think that there is -- always trying to figure out where is the right place in the process to actually get something that, you know, everyone feels comfortable with in terms of layouts and other elements and, you know, from that perspective I wish I personally was more comfortable that we had the right layout with the right fire issues addressed by that will come. I get it. But when you are annexing in and you are, you know, putting this up next to other homes, while not in the city today, maybe someday will be, you want to get it right from that standpoint. So, I think at least for now it's as good as we maybe can hope for until it gets a little further along. But there is still a lot of questions in this area that transitions and develops. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Page 22 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page 20 of 36 Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: If there are no further questions for the applicant or staff, I will go ahead and move that we close the public hearing on H-2020-0078. Hoaglun: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Hansen: Thank you. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: I make a motion that we approve H-2020-0078 after considering all staff, applicant comment and the testimony we received in writing in preparation for today. It's -- your comments on in-fill are spot on, Mr. Mayor, that there are going to be some kinks and wrinkles when we try and do it, but I think this project does a great job and it's appropriate. Appreciate the staff doing the good work to facilitate what can be a good project transition here. I think the -- the DA that goes along with this should limit the use to office uses, understanding that a future -- current or future owner might come to the Council and request to modify that at some future point. But for the purposes now that limitation seems to be acceptable to the applicant and appropriate as part of the admission of this -- of this project. Hoaglun: Second the motion, Mr. Mayor. Simison: I have a motion and a second. Is there any discussion on the motion? Borton: It was kind of a motion blended with some discussions. Simison: Yeah. Yeah. It sounded like you were inserting the DA provision -- Borton: Yes. Simison: -- without officially saying it, but I think the second -- Hoaglun: That was my understanding, that the DA was inserted into that motion. Borton: Correct. Correct. With that limitation. Page 23 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page 21 of 36 Hoaglun: Yes. And Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, I appreciate Mr. Hansen working through the city with this process. It's true, being the first one is a little bit harder sometimes. There is lots of concerns by the neighborhood. They weren't overly happy about the changes that were made to begin with. But that's why we want to make sure we get it right the first time and -- and have a quality place that works well with the neighbors and the access and everything else that's there and, of course, hopefully, the neighborhood understands the roundabout and that is a future issue and that is an Ada County Highway District item that we don't have that control over, but that is certainly something that they need to be aware of and deal with if that comes about in the -- in the near future. Simison: Is there any further discussion on the motion? If not, Clerk will call the roll. Roll call: Bernt, yea; Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, yea; Perreault, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. Thank you very much for being here. Appreciate it very much and good luck. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. DEPARTMENT/COMMISSION REPORTS [Action Item] 26. Mayor's Office: Presentation and Discussion of City Survey Results Simison: Council, next item is Item 26 under Department/Commission Reports. It will be a presentation on the city survey results and I am going to turn this over to Mr. Miles. Miles: Good evening, Mayor and Council Members. Can you all hear me first of all? Good. So, we are good to go and, hopefully, you can see the screen. I will try and put it in the slideshow presentation and see what happens. Still visible? All right. Well, I have got the pleasure this evening of presenting the 2020 community survey results from our most recent survey, which, hopefully, we -- we shared this with you last week. You have had time to read through it. I think one of the things to take away from this is there is a ton of data inside of this, so feel free -- we will have a discussion, answer any of the questions that you might have, but sort of my motto in looking through this overall is that citizens are very pleased with the City of Meridian and what I like to say is -- and there is work to do. So, I think that's just common knowledge. So, we will run through the survey today that was administered by HEC, same company that's done it for the last two years. Their project manager wasn't available this week to present, so I will be doing that for you. We will go over the purpose and methodology quickly. Talk about the high level bottom line up front. Get into some major findings that we see. Sort of go through a summary and, then, have some discussion and questions that you all might have. So, Page 24 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page 22 of 36 our purpose is pretty straightforward. To assess the satisfaction of the citizens and help us look for priorities across the community. We also like to look at the previous surveys that we have done and look at the trends and how we compare to prior years, engage our performance nationally and regionally, and so, again, pretty straightforward. So, for some of you this may be a repeat and for some it may be new, but the methodology of the survey it is a statistically valid survey. It was allotted to be a seven page survey that the directors team and city team and leadership and you all had a chance to review it when it went out. Again, it's the third one we have conducted. It's a mail in survey that HEC -- that the consultant had sent out by mail and, then, once people engage in that mailing they had the option of doing it by mail or online. We got back over 700 surveys, which exceeded our goal of 500, and if you get into the statistical conversation of survey sizes per population base, the 700 responses is far and above what we were looking for as the City of Meridian size dictates at a 95 percent confidence interval in the survey, with a plus or minus 3.7 percent margin of error, which was very good overall. We were targeting a 95 percent confidence interval with a margin of error of five percent. So, it was within those thresholds as well. Location. For your purposes a quick map of the location of the survey respondents. It's really--this represents the --the survey respondents had a good representation across the city. There are certainly areas that maybe they didn't fill it out as many -- or as much as in some areas, but the map clearly shows good distribution across the city. So, I think that's a good representation. Demographics wise, if you had a chance to review pretty balanced across the range of demographics. So, gender was balanced. Age of respondents. We had five categories, ten year -- ten to 20 year demarcations, nearly 20 percent for everyone. So, very balanced for respondent age. Most -- which is not surprising I'm sure. Most live in a single family residence and most of those folks own a single family residence, just based on our demographics in Meridian that is not too surprising. What is surprising is the length of time that folks have lived in Meridian. I think as we start to see surveys continue, over half of the people that took the survey have been here for ten years or less in Meridian. I think that's something to maybe put in -- into your mind and think about as you think about actions and desires and expectations of people moving forward. And the income levels were pretty broad. Sixty- two percent were between 35,000 and 150,000 of annual income. Again, a pretty broad distribution in the demographics in that category. So, the bottom line up front. I think there is sort of two takeaways. One, residents -- very positive perception of the city overall. You can see there 91 percent rated Meridian as an excellent or good place to raise a family and to live. At the high level those are two good returns and metrics. Skipping one. Dissatisfaction so also much higher in Meridian than it is in other communities, whether regionally or nationally, and so those two things are very positive. The next two points, talking about the work to do. The opinion that the city is headed in the right direction. That was something that stood out to our office. There was a ten percent reduction. That's -- from people who said, yes, the city's headed in the right direction and I think you will see the priorities throughout the survey sort of drive that. But there was a ten percent reduction from the last time that we had the survey in 2017 and, again, the top priorities at the bottom of the slide here to work on over the next three years, nothing that I don't think you have all heard. Roads, transportation, education and schools, growth and development. And to some degree I believe that that -- those three things play directly into people's opinions whether or not the city's headed in the right Page 25 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page 23 of 36 direction. Now, as growth has been so fast, you have heard it, you hear it at Council discussions when it comes to planning applications, there is a definitely a nexus there. So, digging a little deeper into the first finding of that positive perception -- and, again, we won't touch on every single detail in the survey. Again, there is a lot of data. But if you have got questions feel free to ask and we will -- we can address those as well. But overall the perception and -- of the community in various factors, very positive ratings for, again, place to raise a family, place to live, ensuring public safety, communications -- the list goes down and we can compare ourselves if we want to drill down into the data nationally and regionally as well. I think it's just a good summary overall that the city is doing good work and is doing work that the community values. This is one that I always like to highlight, because it really touches on a key component of how we are able to provide that great service and it's really from the employees. You know, 85 percent satisfaction rating for greatly exceeds or exceeds expectations on the customer service from city employees speaks volumes to the quality and the care that the city employees provide to the customers. I think that's something to highlight every chance we get. And, again, additionally, overall quality of life rates very high. Overall quality of city services. These are all north of 80 percent and as an ideal place to live right at 80 percent. So, very good comparative for how Meridian does. This metric related to the tax dollars and how the city uses its tax dollars, right in line with the past two cycles of surveys. I think we have been plus or minus one percent of the rating, roughly 74 percent are in that category of ten to seven rating. So, again, a very good, very consistent acknowledgement that the city and the Council Members and the Mayor involved with the budget process using taxpayer dollars wisely. So, I think that's a good accreditation to you all and to the leadership team and to the staff who do the work day to day. Here is just some very specifics on overall ratings of city services. You can see fire rescue, city parks, police department rating right up there at the top, well over 80 percent, pushing 90 percent on some of those as well. Ninety-five percent in fire's case and, then, walking down the line, again, our core services are very well received and very well delivered I think and so that's all the good stuff here that -- just a distribution map that shows generally across the city everybody believes, of those who took it, that the quality of services are exceeding expectations. As a place to live, here is another pictorial map that sort of -- sort of shows the same thing. Excellent to good response as a place to live across the board in the City of Meridian. But sort of validation -- continued validation that things are well delivered in Meridian. Then we move into maybe some action items and major finding number two about the city headed in the right direction and I want to highlight these, because I think -- again, I touched on this, but I believe that many of these are related. So, what I did here was we captured with the red arrow those that are significant decreases since 2017 and you can see generally those are things that have fallen roughly in the ten percent drop range. The city headed in the right direction, a ten percent drop. City managing growth wisely, a 14 percent drop, and the three at the top, quality of housing, sense of community, and enhancing quality of life. Really looking through the data, looking through cross-tabulations, looking through information and responses, they seem all inter -- intertwined and they seem like the big standout category of things for the city to work on over the next few years. So, that's a key takeaway in my mind looking through this data and these responses. This is a little bit of a breakdown of those responses. I think you can see certainly there are some that have increased in rating significantly. Police, law Page 26 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page—of 36 enforcement services, sewer service, water services, code enforcement, communication and, then, you -- you see some significant decreases drilling down a little bit into building permits, services, planning and zoning, recycling services. I know -- and I think there is a lot of discussion to be had around these. We may have some of these questions come up. We will take a stab at the fact that the recycling alone, is there more that can be done? Likely. Have we done a lot in the last few years? Yes. Also the recycling markets overall have been in turmoil for the last three years and so that may just be some of that frustration about the -- the services that people really want versus what's currently available nationwide. Building and permit and planning and zoning services. Again, I think a good follow-up question to this might be of those who have used planning services and building services directly -- I think you might get a different reaction. Whereas some people might be keying on the fact that growth is a driver of their dissatisfaction or -- or decrease in action and they mayjust look at Planning and Zoning and by nexus say, yeah, I don't like that either. So, something to consider as we look at that a little more deeply. Additionally trends. You know, we have increased in over half of the 84 areas that we measure, which is a great -- great statistic. Stayed the same in about six of them and decrease in 31 of them, which we have touched on a handful of them briefly. So, you know, this is a summary of some of those notable areas. Enforcement in dilapidated housings. Cleanup of litter. Those things have all improved. Quality and number of pathways and -- for walking and biking. Although I think there is still work to be done, people see good increases across the board, across the city. Code enforcement, abandoned vehicles, all that is good stuff and as we mentioned that notable decreases and the notable -- noticeable satisfaction decreases, managing growth -- growth and development, sustainable conscious environment, enhancing the quality of life and housing, variety of options across the city. So, we have touched on all those. It's just a summary of that trend analysis and I'm sure you will have discussion on some of these as well. Maybe you are finding number three and I do -- I go through some of this quickly, because it is across the board with one comparing ourselves to other cities regionally and nationally Meridian consistently comes out well above others. So, here is a place to raise a family. We are at 91 percent compared to the mountain region and the U.S. We are significantly higher. Same with a place to live. Place to work is also higher significantly. And even as we talk about growth as a major area of decrease since 2017, we are still consistently higher than -- than regional areas and nationally. I think that's -- that's something to remember. Quality of life items that relate Meridian to regional and national standards. Again, customer service from city employees. That's a very drastic difference in our city employees in the customer service that they provide compared to the national and regional metrics, which is great. Speaks volumes to the work that they do. Overall quality in life is higher. Quality of city services. Again, significantly higher. And the value received for the taxes I think, again, testament to you all in the leadership putting together budgets and expanding them. Significantly higher than the national and regional trends. And, again, you know, we touched on the city moving in the right direction. Yes, we had a ten percent drop. But, again, we are still consistently above the national and regional averages for that. Again here is some core services. They are all consistently higher for the most part. Again, you can see recycling services at the bottom. Fairly close. So, you know, again, to me that sort of says recycling markets overall. Recycling practices overall. Probably some nexus and consistency in the challenges that the recycling markets have Page 27 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page——— been facing. But other areas -- traffic enforcement, code enforcement, communication, consistently higher. And the trash and garbage services as you dissect that from recycling services specifically. Ratings of Parks and Recreation services. Again, many are consistently higher as you go down through into insert through -- excuse me -- number of pathways and walking and biking. A little lower than the national and regional trends. I think we have got some work to do there. But I also think to some degree that sort of -- some of the challenges that the Meridian City and the geology just play into, that we have challenges to overcome in that regard. But, again, very good ratings compared to ourselves nationally and regionally. Public safety ratings consistently above the national and regional averages from EMS, fire response, police response times, overall feeling of safety, which is a very important metric for our community, 92 percent compared to the regional and national averages of roughly 65 to 70 percent and very -- very positive ratings. Visibility of neighbor -- police and neighborhoods as well is above the national average and in the regional averages. We get it a little further down into code enforcement satisfaction ratings. Again, specified abandoned junk and abandoned vehicle removal, cleanup of litter and debris, weed abatement, consistently higher than those averages. So, you can see these trends, again, with communications continue to show very positive ratings as we walk through these slides. And, then, we move on to the top community priorities, which I think sort of take into play the -- the action items of where we go over the next few years as a city as we head into the next cycle of survey respondents and no surprise, roads far outweigh the number one choice of anything else, but really roads, transportation, growth and development, and education and schools. Those three things far outweigh in people's mind the rest of the items that we asked about, starting with affordable housing and walking on down. So, I think that gives us pretty clear guiding light. Some of these things you all and the city staff are already engaging on. If we talk about education in schools, we will get into some summary slides talking about the efforts with the staff position that was recently hired in the Planning Department, conversations with the schools and the transportation agencies. Again, this is -- if we look at an important satisfaction rating, which the consultant did put together for us, sort of takes the importance rating and the satisfaction rating, runs them through a mathematical calculation to give us an important satisfaction ratio. Planning and Zoning zoning services clearly out-- out at number one. Again, I will say that, you know, I think a curious question would be of those who have used the Planning and Zoning services what's their satisfaction level and I bet we would see a different rating. So, something to keep in mind. But that was rated number one, an important satisfaction rating and something that we can certainly look at and I think we already -- this body is -- in 2020 has already taken action on and, then, some medium priorities which follow down much lower than the Planning and Zoning services that are cited up there, but you can see the remaining services, some in traffic enforcement, recycling services, department of law -- law enforcement department services. So, the list is there as well. So, the transportation improvements that we touched on is one of the top three. Clearly roadway widening is something that the community is looking for. It outweighs many other things. Intersection improvements is the next category at 52 percent. But clearly you can see roadway widening in people's minds is the number one thing that they want to see in the community for the next few years. Just diving down a little deeper, we asked about future roadway construction projects related to that last question and we offered up five categories or five Page 28 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page——— specific projects, whether it's widening Locust Grove from Fairview to Ustick, you can see there. Widening Linder Road. Widening Ustick Road. Constructing the overpass or widening Victory Road and, really, I think in my mind the first four are very close, I think within five percentage points of each other, 60 -- probably 69 percent to 74 percent for those in the high priority to next highest priority. Certainly you can dissect each of those four and what people are looking for. You know, if you look at Linder Road overpass -- well, that's the majority of people's high priority. But widening Locust Grove is the majority of the high priority to the next level. So, lots of room for discussion. I think any action taken on any four of those really drives -- and would show progress I think over the next two years. This was an interesting question I think for you all to consider. You know, we asked the question if a bond measure were placed on a ballot would there be support. Fifty percent of the people said yes. Twenty-one percent said no. But 29 percent said they don't know and in my mind is you have to work to provide them more facts on what that means and you will have some mix of that 29 percent going one way or the other. We didn't identify this as a Meridian ballot question. We identified it generally as a bond question. I think this is helpful information for our agency partners, as well as the highway district and the state as well. So, curious piece of information to share with you. And, then, some other findings in general. Communications wise, I think we -- we continue to look at communications as a component of getting information out to people, but also looking at the communication and the feedback we do receive as ways to help push new information and also as a way to help guide what sources work for us as a community. Where are people getting their information. You can see the majority of people are getting their information from social media and the website. Even e-mail. Those are up pretty significantly from past years. In fact, we look at e-mails from the city. That's a 25 percent increase from 2017 in where people are getting their information by e-mail. That's --that's a big jump. If you look at utility bill flyer information, overall since 2014 that's been a 15 percent decrease from 2014 with an eight percent decrease since 2017. So, we start to look at overall as a community how do we continue to provide information to those that get their information in the various ways, but also get the biggest bang for our buck. We have looked at cross-sectional data and there is not too much of a variance across the age demographic. There are some, but not a dramatic amount of who gets utility bill information compared to city website or e-mail data. The majority of the cross-tab, cross- section of the survey respondents, they drive -- they get their information -- information from websites, social media and e-mails and that's just the trend that we will notice and -- and look to take action to and recommendations on how we get information out there in the future. This is something that we have asked in the past three years. It's something that always comes up -- seems to come up at the legislature in conversations with the Association of Cities, so we figured that we would share this. Not much change from past years in terms of who we support and who would we -- in fact, it's essentially the same. In 2017 we had 42 percent, 37 percent and 21 percent. So, pretty close -- pretty -- pretty consistent. So, I think in summary, you know, again, you can see very positive perception of the city overall and the city services and the customer service that they are getting. But I think we have a good opportunity to make active work now and ensure that the city is heading in the right direction for the citizens and we have got work that we can show to bring those -- those numbers back up and increase them. Overall satisfaction ratings are slightly higher than 2017 as a generality and significantly higher-- and significantly higher Page 29 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page— —— than 2014, which is great. Again, I don't need to -- to drill into the fact that we are much higher than other communities regionally and nationally, but I think the top priority is probably the key takeaway there in terms of things to work on. Roads. Transportation. Growth. Development. Education and school. So, I think overall a few areas of action based on those. Maybe we look at areas of traffic enforcement and goals and action. There was some information in the survey that touched on a few of those. Jobs and economic development, communications evolution and, then, the response to growth and development. What are we going to do. I think you will see some nexus with our proposed strategic plan, which will be coming to you again in the next couple of weeks. We will be talking about the new strategic plan, as well as a follow up after that to wrap up the existing strategic plan as we close out the calendar year. But we are already making some efforts with the Planning Department and the Unified Development work groups -- Unified Development Code work groups that we are putting together through Planning and the open space discussion. Again, I mentioned the new transportation school board coordination position and Miranda already engaging on some of these and already engaging with transportation solutions and partnerships. You have a joint meeting coming up with the highway district very soon. So, that's another way to engage on that and opening up the dialogue on education and schools and I would be remiss if I didn't point out, again, the customer service in Meridian is one to be proud of. Again, 44 percent above the national average with our customer service that the employees deliver day to day, something to be very proud of I think. That's it. I will stop there and let you guys have questions, comments, dialog. Happy to address any questions that you do have. Simison: Thank you, Mr. Miles. Council, do you have any questions that we can attempt to answer without the assistance of our provider of the survey? Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Member Perreault. Perreault: Excuse me. Dave, I just was curious about the -- the population that was mailed the surveys or sent the surveys. Did -- did they look at or take into account the residence or type of property in which the resident lives? So, I notice that what I thought was a very high percentage of individuals that -- that owned homes in comparison to the actual demographic within the city. So, I don't know if it's just because those individuals were the ones that answered the surveys, but the surveys were really sent out to a greater variety, but I think it -- you know, I would like to have maybe seen a little bit more commentary from individuals who lived in maybe townhomes or apartments or -- and not that -- not that one is better than the other, it's just like I really would like to see a good sampling of the different types of property owners and renters, because so many of these questions are related to growth and that usually means housing and walkability, transportation, that kind of thing. And, then, my second question is when they are -- in the survey was there any kind of disclaimers made in the questions regarding transportation and schools to clarify with the participants that the city -- that, you know, ACHD and West Ada are -- are the primary entities? Was that clarified or was there a disclaimer made? We oftentimes receive public comment and e-mails and whatnot about Page 30 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page 28—— transportation and we generally, then, redirect those individuals to ACHD. So, I just was curious if we thought some of these answers were made with the -- maybe misunderstanding by the respondents that -- that we have more control over it than we do. Miles: Yeah. Very good questions. Thank you for -- for those, Mr. Mayor and Council Woman Perreault. I will take the second one first, clarifying which agencies operate or construct road projects, yes. For instance, in question ten where we asked folks to prioritize which project of the four or five that they would rather see. We asked: Meridian prioritizes roadway projects that the Ada County Highway District does not currently have. So, I don't think every single question we made a point of saying roads are controlled by ACHD or ITD. However, what's your opinion on -- we did have general questions that do talk about what's your satisfaction with our partners and their relationships in terms of offering the services that they offer. ACHD and roads. ITD and roads. So, overall as a survey body it was clarified, but we didn't ask on a specific question by question basis in all cases. To your first question on housing, we do ask the questions of the demographics across whether you rent or you own, whether you live in a single family home, a triplex, multi-family apartment, trailer home and just by nature I think that -- I could get some statistics for you from our Finance Department on the percentage of single family housing ownership and residency versus other types, but it is fairly consistent with prior years and fairly consistent with our demographics that generally we have more folks that live in and own single family residences. The survey instrument was mailed out over 3,500 copies and, then, the way -- my understanding of the way the consultant operates is that as they get people to respond that's how they start admitted steam -- do we have a complete survey, is it a valid survey, and, then, we start to take that count and they look at the demographics as they start receiving those surveys and, again, they try to get a broad scope, but if we have the majority of property owners -- or property -- or residents who take the survey are property owners or single family property owners, by nature there is going to be more of those. So, I hope that addresses your question, but happy for any clarification. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Yes, it does. I just -- so, what you are saying is that if -- if responses start to come in, if -- if we notice -- or if the -- the consultants notice that there was one demographic that was much -- much higher than the others then possibly they would have sent out more surveys and increase their overall population of surveys until -- until we felt like we got an appropriate sampling and at this point they felt like 94 -- was it 94 percent of the respondents living in and a majority owning a single family home was representative of our housing? Miles: That's correct. Perreault: Okay. Page 31 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page——— Simison: And if I could add -- I don't know that we have ever asked them specifically to hit -- it's been more about the geographic representation for percentage of where people live, not necessarily their housing type. That would probably have to be something else that we would ask them to specifically focus on in the future if that's what we wanted was something to that level. Perreault: Okay. Thank you. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. Thanks very much, Dave, for giving us an overview. It's a complicated survey, so I appreciate you going into the key conclusions. The recycling one kind of puzzled me, because we have expanded our services so much, but, then, I started looking at what I --what I'm wondering about, if we can do -- is when we get a theme in the survey, if we want to go back and kind of compare that to the perception heat map that we get from different parts of the city. Like I'm looking at -- at page 119. 1 guess I would be curious to follow up on recycling and services. It seems like from what I know of the area in Meridian that has a neutral perception, I think that area may contain a lot more rental apartments and I know that recycling services are not as widely available for multi-family units and so that makes me wonder is there some kind of specific follow up we can do sort of looking at the map and maybe talking with area residents or trying to drill down into what's changed or if certain areas have specific concern. So, that's just one example where I sort of thought it's interesting looking at the map, you know, there seems to be one area maybe where there -- maybe they don't have adequate recycling services. Miles: Mr. Mayor, Council Woman Strader, I think that's a great point. That's the benefit of these maps that are in the survey. It allows us to look at key topics or topics that we so choose to look at and find out is there any cross-tabular relation in -- in this case in a geographical location or other scenarios. So, that's a good observation and one that we can, you know, pass onto the subject matter experts and say here is an area to consider and look into this area. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Dave, thanks. I love this stuff. This has been a lot of fun for me to kind of dig into this and there were a couple of pieces I pulled away that I think are worth celebrating today. One is the ongoing tremendous work by our communication staff at all levels, seeing gains in that area. That was something to be really applauded. But the biggest takeaway for me was the increase of our public's view on law enforcement, especially taking into account when this survey was conducted in the midst of a lot of civil unrest. I expected to see those numbers fall and to see them actually gain a little bit to me speaks to what we have got going on in our community. I think that piece is -- is worth celebrating. Page 32 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page 30—— Dave, you kind of started talking a little bit about there was some work to be done and, clearly, I think in the -- the Building Services, Planning Department, we have got to figure out a piece that we can meet our citizens expectations there. Clearly I think our employees are doing a good job and -- and you touched on that. It would be interesting to know how those people are responding and I'm -- I'm curious if you and the -- the department heads kind of touched on -- there is work to be done and I'm curious if this is a piece that you guys have discussed and if there is any preview of things to come that you are looking to do to kind of approach this issue? Miles: Mr. Mayor and Councilman Cavener, great question. We have -- we have talked at the director level about the initial results, because, again, we just got them a week or so ago. So, I think there is follow-up discussion on what does it actually mean for the next steps. What types of improvements, what types of areas should each department look at and are there actions to come out of those. Are we at a high level discussion about the general results, again, being positive, but there are these areas to work at and so that's something that, you know, I look to the directors and to the Mayor and say, you know, okay, what's our next steps and what are our action items out of each. Simison: And, Councilman Cavener, if I could add in, I think Dave -- it's been a long day for him, because we actually just shared this with the directors this morning, where they -- where they got the -- at least a little -- the -- a brief conversation on this topic and kind of to your -- to the point, when I -- when I look at this, you know, and the history of the survey, they love our services that we are primarily responsible for. I do take -- I do cross out the key development one as not -- I think people just view that as growth. That -- that's not about their interactions with the department in my view, because we probably need to find a better way to really get into that information in future surveys to determine what their perception is of the work there. But the challenge I gave to the departments today is, you know, I don't know that we want to -- you know, can you keep going up in police and fire or do we need to be focused on roads and schools and growth and what can the departments do to help be part of that conversation moving forward. And so that's really what I challenged them with today is looking at these results and looking at the areas that are not our core responsibilities, but they are part of when this -- when the citizens ask the question are we heading in the right direction, I think that, you know, that's what they are looking at as much as anything else. That's not -- that's not based on -- to your point, our -- our Police Department, it's not based on the results of the Parks and it's not based on the results of our Fire, then, you know, those are three public facing ones. The results don't -- the results of the survey don't lead to that conclusion that that's where the focus and concerns are with the community. So, it was just the first conversation. We will have more. But I guess I would challenge all the Council, because it's not the first time you have heard it either. For three of us that were knocking doors this last -- I guess about a year ago, we have heard this. Roads. Schools. Growth. You have heard of roads, schools, growth. So, I'm going to challenge this Council, what are you going to do about roads, schools, and growth and I'm going to challenge myself, my staff, what are we going to do about roads, schools, and growth. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Page 33 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page 31 of 36 Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I appreciate that comment. What -- you know, one thing I -- I think I would be curious to see us all do some research on -- clearly there is a growth theme and the frustration in the community and I think I would appreciate just a comprehensive look at what other municipalities have done to -- that have dealt with large amounts of growth and if there was a way that they managed it differently and to sort of pull back like this is a macro level frustration. Are there things we need to take a look at? You know, I'm thinking there -- there are places like Boulder and other cities that have taken different approaches to managing their growth. It doesn't mean that's a good fit for us, but it would be good I think to make sure we are looking to set a really high level at all the possible tools. Simison: And the one thing I would point out just -- again, this is relative. You saw where this -- where nationwide. This is one area where we are in that nationwide and intermountain west is in growth in terms of people's viewpoint on it. It just happens to be so far out of whack of everything else in the survey, but it stands out. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. I mean I think that's important context; right? But at the same time I -- I -- I share your feedback that, you know, door knocking a year ago -- I heard a lot of frustration and I think a lot of the comments about maybe the Planning and Zoning function could just be, you know, kind of general frustration at things changing quickly. That's all. Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, I was just -- I was interested in seeing how -- how many people that filled out the survey that were here less than ten years -- ten years or less and that was -- that was surprising. For those of us that lived here a long time, you know, you can kind of sometimes talk to them and there is that nostalgia, I wish it was the way it used to be, and I used to travel from here to there in this amount of time and -- and -- but it's just interesting to see how many -- that that had to weigh into that, that they have been here less than ten years and they are expressing that. Now, I don't know -- I -- it's hard to read into that whether it's -- it is true, things like widening the roads, it lags behind the growth and the school infrastructure lags behind the growth, but also it could be a part of -- it's a phenomenon that happens anywhere -- is it's -- I'm aboard, pull up the gang plank mentality, too. Now that I'm here don't change anything. Just like some of us old timers. Why are you changing it, you know. So, it's -- it's an interesting -- interesting dichotomy that's out there. How do you -- how do you handle that and -- and -- because on the campaign trail, you know, people talked about some frustrations, but glad about certain things and glad this door opened up and glad that we have this now and we didn't used to have that. So, it's just kind of working through that and seeing what -- in a more tact Page 34 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page 32 of 36 -- at a tactical level what is it those things are and we really need to work on, because the frustration sometimes is expressed generally on some things and, then, we can focus more granularly on those real items that really need to be fixed. So, that's -- that's a little harder, because you can't get all -- to all of that in a survey like this. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: And to that end, in the questions that did talk about our prioritizations, the top one was transportation, essentially, that they thought was the highest need and so I think that is a good indication that --when people say they are unhappy with growth, that's, you know, those top -- that top item is really what it is that they are -- they are pointing at. mean I think statistically that shows us that, not just kind of a guess that that's -- that's what they mean when they say they are unhappy with the planning, which is why I was asking the specific questions of Dave -- Dave about how those were -- how the questions were phrased to the respondents. But what I would say is that, you know, there is -- there is -- there is two things. There is -- either a really legitimate need for widening and additional roads based on traffic counts, based on safety, and, then, there is just a convenience factor and truthfully, yeah, it is definitely -- I have lived in Meridian for 11 years. It is a lot less convenient to get from one place to another than it used to be, but it's also made me have to be more purposeful about when -- when I go places and where I go places and what time and to make -- it makes me have to be more efficient with, you know, I'm not going to drive down the road and go to the grocery store twice in one day, I'm going to do it once a week, you know, that kind of thing and I don't think that that's bad. I think that's actually a really good thing for people to get in the habit of having to plan better and think more -- you know, think farther in advance about how they move around our city. I think that is something that's good and it's -- I think there is some resistance to it, because people will be -- want to be able to drive where they want when they want and I do, too, but it's not a bad thing for people to have to kind of get into some different habits with that and so the question really is do we really have a problem with roads, do we really have a safety factor, do we really have, you know, issues that are legitimate things that cause us to invest in widening a road or is this more about, you know, convenience I guess, and I don't know how to answer that question. I'm just saying I think that's part of what we are seeing in the responses. Simison: Council, any further comments or questions at this time or, if not, we can take this and digest it and would love to have future conversations, either as we move into the strategic planning conversation or offline with Mr. Miles or myself at any point in time on what you may have seen or heard or think might be a good output. Okay. Perfect. Thank you, Mr. Miles. Miles: Thank you all. Appreciate it. ORDINANCES [Action Item] Page 35 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page 33 of 36 27. Ordinance No. 20-1895: An Ordinance (H-2020-0042 — Compass Charter School East Expansion) for Annexation of a Parcel of Land Within the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, as Described in Attachment "A" and Annexing Certain Lands and Territory, Situated in Ada County, Idaho, and Adjacent and Contiguous to the Corporate Limits of the City of Meridian as Requested by the City of Meridian; Establishing and Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification of 10.501 Acres of Land From RUT to R-15 (Medium- High Density Residential) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code; Providing That Copies of This Ordinance Shall be Filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, And the Idaho State Tax Commission, as Required by Law; and Providing for a Summary of the Ordinance; and Providing for a Waiver of the Reading Rules; and Providing an Effective Date Simison: Okay. Moving on to Ordinances, Item 27 -- Item 27, Ordinance No. 20-1895. Ask the Clerk to read this ordinance by title. Johnson: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. This is an ordinance related to H-2020-0042 Compass Charter School East Expansion for annexation of a parcel of land within the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise meridian, Ada county, Idaho, as described in Attachment "A" and annexing certain lands and territory, situated in Ada county, Idaho, and adjacent and contiguous to the corporate limits of the City of Meridian as requested by the City of Meridian; establishing and determining the land use zoning classification of 10.501 acres of land from RUT to R-15 (Medium-High Density Residential) zoning district in the Meridian City Code; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; and providing for a summary of the ordinance; and providing for a waiver of the reading rules; and providing an effective date. Simison: Thank you, Mr. Clerk. You have heard this ordinance read by title. Is there anybody who would like it read in its entirety? Seeing and hearing none, do I have a motion? Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: My apologies for the dog. I move that we approve Ordinance No. 20-1895 with the suspension of rules. Strader: Second. Page 36 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page"—— Simison: I have a motion and a second that's not the dog. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed no. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. 28. Ordinance No. 20-1894: An Ordinance (H-2020-0043 — Gem Innovation School) for Annexation of a Parcel of Land Within The Southwest '/4 of the Northwest '/4 of the Southwest '/4 of Section 28, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, as Described in Attachment "A" and Annexing Certain Lands and Territory, Situated in Ada County, Idaho, and Adjacent and Contiguous to the Corporate Limits of the City of Meridian as Requested by the City of Meridian; Establishing and Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification of 8.00 Acres of Land from RUT to R-15 (Medium-High Density Residential) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code; Providing That Copies of This Ordinance Shall be Filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as Required by Law; and Providing for a Summary of the Ordinance; and Providing for a Waiver of the Reading Rules; and Providing an Effective Date Simison: Item 28 is Ordinance No. 20-1894. Ask the clerk to read this title -- or read this ordinance by title only. Johnson: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. This is an ordinance related to H-2020-0043, Gem Innovation School for annexation of a parcel of land within the Southwest '/4 of the Northwest '/4 of the Southwest '/4 of Section 28, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise meridian, Ada county, Idaho, as described in Attachment "A" and annexing certain lands and territory, situated in Ada county, Idaho, and adjacent and contiguous to the corporate limits of the City of Meridian as requested by the City of Meridian; establishing and determining the land use zoning classification of 8.00 acres of land from RUT to R-15 (Medium-High Density Residential) zoning district in the Meridian City Code; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; and providing for a summary of the ordinance; and providing for a waiver of the reading rules; and providing an effective date. Simison: Thank you, Mr. Clerk. You have -- Council, you have heard this item read by title. Is there anybody that would like it read its entirety? See none, do I have a motion? Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: I move that we approve Ordinance No. 20-1894 with the suspension of rules. Page 37 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page 35—— Cavener: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve the ordinance under suspension of the rules. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Oppose no. The ayes have it. The ordinance is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. FUTURE MEETING TOPICS Simison: Do we have anything under future meeting topics? EXECUTIVE SESSION 29. Per Idaho Code 74-206A(1)(a) To deliberate on a labor contract offer or to formulate a counteroffer; and (f) To communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending litigation, or controversies not yet being litigated but imminently likely to be litigated. Simison: Okay. Do I have a motion? Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I move that we go into Executive Session per Idaho Code 74-206A(1)(a) and (f). Hoaglun: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second to enter into Executive Session. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, Clerk will call the roll. Roll call: Bernt, yea; Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, yea; Perreault, yea. Simison: All ayes. We adjourn into Executive Session. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (7:41 p.m. to 8:27 p.m.) Bernt: Move we come out of Executive Session. Hoaglun: Second the motion. Page 38 Meridian City Council Item#1. September 8,2020 Page——— Simison: All in favor? All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Bernt: Move we adjourn. Hoaglun: Second. Simison: All in favor. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:27 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 9 / 22 / 2020 MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK Page 39 C � WE N DIAN --- IDAHO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Item Title: Future Meeting Topics - Public Forum (Up to 30 Minutes Maximum) Signing up prior to the start of the meeting is required. This time is reserved for the public to address their elected officials regarding matters of general interest or concern of public matters and is not specific to an active land use/development application. By law, no decisions can be made on topics presented under this public comment section, other than the City Council may request that the topic be added to a future meeting agenda for a more detailed discussion or action. The Mayor may also direct staff to further assist you in resolving the matter following the meeting Meeting Notes: I CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC FORUM SIGN-IN SHEET 1 Date: September 8, 2020 I Prior to the commencement of the meeting a person wishing to address the Mayor and City Council MUST sign in and limit their comments to the matter described below. Complaints about individuals, city staff, business or private matters will not be allowed. Testimony or comment on an active application or proposal that is or will be pending before Planning and j Zoning or City Council is strictly prohibited by Idaho law. Each speaker will have up to three (3) minutes to address the Mayor and Council, but the chair may stop the speaker if the matter does appear to violate guidelines, varies from the topic identified on this sign in sheet or other provisions of law or policy, i Print Name Provide Description of Discussion Topic i 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the August 25, 2020 City Council Work Session Page 5 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 25,2020 Page 25 of 25 MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:44 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 9 / 8 / 2020 MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK Page 30 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the August 25, 2020 City Council Regular Meeting Page 31 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 25,2020 Page——— Bernt: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve Ordinance No. 20-1891 under suspension of the rules. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. The item is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. FUTURE MEETING TOPICS Simison: Anything under future meeting topics? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I would like to have a future discussion on whether we could find a way to allow for the Planning office to use their discretion to have a verbal summary of requests for extensions of final plat, instead of writing up these extensive memos. Simison: So long as legal is okay with it. I have no issue with it and do we need a discussion about it? But -- noted. Duly noted. Duly noted. Perfect. Anything else under this future meeting item? Or do I have a motion to adjourn? Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, I move we adjourn. Strader: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to adjourn. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7.52 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 9 / 8 / 2020 MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK Page 70 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Bainbridge Subdivision No. 11 Pedestrian Pathway Easement Page 71 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-117583 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=6 KRISTINA LOWRY 09/10/2020 10:13 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE Proiect Name(Subdivision): Bainbridge Subdivision#11 PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this 8th day ofSeptember2020, between Brighton Development Inc hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", and the City of Meridian, an Idaho municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as"Grantee"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian desires to establish a public pathway; and WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to grant an easement to establish a public pathway and provide connectivity to present and future portions of the pathway; and WHEREAS, Grantor shall construct the pathway improvements upon the easement described herein;and NOW,THEREFORE,the parties agree as follows: THE GRANTOR does hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following property, described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit `B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing a public pedestrian pathway easement for multiple-use non-motorized recreation, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees that it will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees,brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED,by and between the parties hereto,that the Grantor shall repair and maintain the pathway improvements. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the easement hereby granted become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV.01/01/2020 then, to such extent such easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that it will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hereinabove written. GRANTOR: Brighton Development Inc. Jonathan .Wardle, President STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 8Q (date) by Jonathan D.Wardle (name of individual), [complete the fallowing if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of Brighton Development Inc. (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: President (type of authority such as officer or trustee) (stamp) LIU4 L'Vt- Notary Signature SHARI VAUGHAN My Commission Expires: - _a Da Notary Public-State of Idaho Commission Number 20191002 My Commission Expires Jun 1, 2024 Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 01/01/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison,Mayor Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 9-8-2020 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk,respectively. Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2022 Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 01/01/2020 km 9233 WEST STATE STREET I BOISE,ID 83714 1 208,639.6939 1 FAX 208.639.6930 August 21, 2020 Bainbridge Subdivision No. 11 Project No. 19-136 Legal Description City of Meridian Pathway Easement Exhibit A A parcel of land for a City of Meridian Pathway Easement situated in the North 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 27, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, B.M., City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap marking the Northeast corner of said Section 27,which bears S89°17'35"E a distance of 2,647.29 feet from a found aluminum cap marking the North 1/4 corner of said Section 27, thence following the northerly line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 27, N89017'35"W a distance of 1,749.00 feet to a point; Thence leaving said northerly line, S00'42'25"W a distance of 70.00 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar on the southerly right-of-way line of West Chinden Boulevard (State Highway 20/26); Thence leaving said southerly right-of-way line, S00'42'25"W a distance of 16.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence S00'42'25"W a distance of 14.00 feet to a point; Thence N89'17'35"W a distance of 855.70 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar on the easterly right-of-way line of N. Tree Farm Way; Thence following said easterly right-of-way line, N45°33'59"E a distance of 19.75 feet to a point which bears S45033'59"W of a 5/8-inch rebar on said southerly right-of-way line; Thence leaving said easterly right-of-way line, S89°17'35"E a distance of 841.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said description contains a total of 11,882 square feet (0.273 acres), more or less, and is subject to any existing easements and/or rights-of-way of record or implied. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is hereby made a part hereof. a w12 59a OF $ . Z�•7,o7.0 ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS I PLANNERS iS\ABALLARD\KM ENGINEERING\KM GENERAL-REMOTE WORK\PROJECT\19-136\CAD\SURVEY\EXHIBITS\19-136 CITY OF MERIDIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT.DWG,AARON BALLARD,8/21/2020,KY� N, 'Tree Farm way itiJ N N -Vz-n ;0 �z w 1p r- ICD � C zzE;j p M Z C 14' CITY OF MERIDIAN I o m n PATHWAY EASEMENT I .J� C� 0o � —16' °z N s 70' M v Ln 1 C z IQ I � I� v� (J71 Iv I o� I� n �+ DO I LD Ln r� � o Ico � LA O CL I C rr I4 O Can [4�Ji °a r I N I p Ln P M O CC I O CL4 W N N 5U M N N to ( L» - I Y I QY M M :E CA O fD M v� I o I-� N NID I oo l p V LLn a a n Q 4 I m LA n n I Lin I z O� m m m�T Z a 1 C C) - z II z� � o o a p � 00 I z z Ci oKM 0 m I� z IV N •J�--I N_Ten Mile Rd. � o — N tQ Ol W WZ T ~ EXHIBIT B - City of Meridian Pathway Easement oaW M .. 3mmm- Bainbridge Subdivision No. 11 z O m D T ?o0n YJ o �oomrn a A Situated in a portion of the N 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of z W o Section 27, T4N., R1W., B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, ID c, � o 841.77 855.70 Title: City of Meridian Pathway Date:08-21-2020 Scale: 1 inch= 150 feet I File: Tract 1: 0.273 Acres: 11882 Sq Feet:Closure=n67.2712w 0.00 Feet: Precision>1/999999: Perimeter=1731 Feet 001=s00.4225w 14.00 003=n45.3359e 19.75 002=n89.1735w 855.70 004=s89.1735e 841.77 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Baraya Subdivision No. 5 Pedestrian Pathway Easement ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-117584 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 KRISTINA LOWRY 09/10/2020 10:13 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE Project Name(subdivision): Baraya Subdivision No. 5 PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this 8th day of September20 20, between Endurance Holdings LLC hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", and the City of Meridian, an Idaho municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as"Grantee"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian desires to establish a public pathway; and WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to grant an easement to establish a public pathway and provide connectivity to present and future portions of the pathway, and WHEREAS, Grantor shall construct the pathway improvements upon the easement described herein; and NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: THE GRANTOR does hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following property, described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing a public pedestrian pathway 4 easement for multiple-use non-motorized recreation, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees that it will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto,that the Grantor shall repair and maintain the pathway improvements. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the easement hereby granted become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 01/01/2020 then, to such extent such easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that it will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hereinabove written. GRANTOR: (=ndur ce Hol ings LLC Corey Barto an r STATE OF ID County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on ate) by Corey Barton (name of individual), [complete the following if si ning in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of Endurance Holdings LLC (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: Manager (type of authority such as officer or trustee) 0 ��f� r ° .. p Agl,••a `��- Notary Signature My Commission Expires: �Q �- My COMMISSION : S EXPIRES 6-5-2022 = ° OF Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 01/01/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 9-8-2020 (elate) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk,respectively. Notary Signature 3-28-2022 My Commission Expires: Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 01/01/2020 EXH1131T A DESCRIPTION FOR BARAYA SUBDIVISION NO. 5 MERIDIAN REGIONAL PATHWAY EASEMENT A portion of the NE 1/4 of the NW 114 and the NW 114 of the NE 114 of Section 15, T.3N., R.1 W., B.M., Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the N1i4 corner of said Section 15 from which the NW corner of said Section 15 bears North 89015'34" West, 2640.56 feet,- thence South 12038'17" West, 988,29 feet to the easterly most corner of Lot 2, Block 14, said point also being an angle point on the southeasterly boundary line of Lot 1, Block 14 of Baraya Subdivision No, 3 as filed in Book 116 of Plats at Pages 17630 through 17634, records of Ada County, Idaho and the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence along the southeasterly boundary line of said Lot 1 North 63°49'38" East, 25.03 feet; thence leaving said southeasterly boundary line South 29'02'07" East, 429.95 feet; thence North 8901616" West, 28.80 feet; thence North 29002'07" West, 416.89 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. ` 7729 (131za-0 ' OF NID Page 1 of 1 0 tv d • BASIS OF BEARING O 00 S S"1 _ _ N89`15'34"W_2640.56' 1/4 S.10 11 5.1.16 5.15 _ W. FRANKLIN ROAD • S.15 U C .J Q m Cnl cv;0 Q C � BARAYA SUBDIIVSION ti:J NO. 3 RPOB NS�O SG� SE CORNER d BLOCK 14 �% LOT 2, BLK 14 a- 7 2 9 �0 •' +*++�� N63'49'38"E 4 + � ++ G'L +'+`f\`� 10 BARAYA ` `.` o. Z + BLOCK 14 SUBDIVSION +' +$ * + - NO. 4 �O �p `+`++� Q � Q r +\ + + +\ o + + + i + + + + +\ 1 ++ +++*,� N89'15'16"W\ + + # 28.80' \ UNPL,ATTED ��AHO EXHIBIT DRAWING FOR JOB NO I '[]t,c�/ BARAYA SUBDIVISION NO. 5 2D-158 SURVEY R V L i 0013 . EMERALD 837 4 SHM NO. (20S)66,3570837pq MERIDIAN REGIONAL PATHWAY EASEMENT 1 fzoslsae-asra GROUP, L LC LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 AND 7HE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF DWa DATE SECTION 15, T.3N-, RAW,, ELM., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 8/13/2020 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Edgehill Subdivision No. 2 Pedestrian Pathway Easement Page 84 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-117717 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=7 KRISTINA LOWRY 09/10/2020 10:51 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE Project Name (Subdivision: Edgehill Subdivision No. 2 PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this 8th day of Sept., 20 20, between Challenger Development, In hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", and the City of Meridian, an Idaho municipal corporation, here- inafter referred to as "Grantee"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian desires to establish a public pathway; and WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to grant an easement to establish a public pathway and provide connectivity to present and future portions of the pathway; and WHEREAS, Grantor shall construct the pathway improvements upon the easement described herein; and NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree,as follows: THE GRANTOR does hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following property, described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit `B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing a public pedestrian pathway easement for multiple-use non-motorized recreation, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees that it will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that the Grantor shall repair and maintain the pathway improvements. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the easement hereby granted become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 01/01/2020 then, to such extent such easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that it will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hereinabove written. GRANTOR: Challenger Developme , In . Corey Barton/Manager STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on AA.10]vagdate) by C,- 7b (name of individual), [complete the following q signing in a representative c acid , or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of �v •� � (name of enpr'e on behalf of whom record was executed), in the fallowing representative capacity: si'l 't (type of authority such as officer or trustee) �``�Y,r��141 111111�1 aF •�"p�i'Y pwd-+. �� Notary Signature • = My Commission Expires: W COMMISSION EXPIRES 6-5-2022 �f�rlIllt�11 Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 01/01/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO, ) . ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 9-8-2020 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2022 Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 01/01/2020 l— (rJ-U•� J-U-B COMPAMES THE GATEWAY MAPPMc GRWP f INC. J•U•B ENGINEERS, INC. Exhibit "A" Edgehill Subdivision Pathway Easement Project No. 10-19-017 May 19, 2020 A tract of land situate in the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 25, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, lying in the City of Meridian, County of Ada, State of Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 25;thence South 00°37'16"West,coincident with the west line of said Section 25, a distance of 1,325.76 feet to a 2-inch aluminum cap stamped "PLS 17665" marking the north sixteenth corner common to said Section 25 and Section 26, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian; thence leaving said west line,coincident with the south line of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of said Section 25,the following two(2)consecutive courses and distances: l. South 89°23'22" East, a distance of 48.00 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar with a plastic cap stamped "PLS 17665"marking the most southerly southeast corner of the tract of land described in the warranty deed to Ada County Highway District recorded as Instrument No. 2020-014484, Official Records of Ada County, hereinafter referred to as the ACHD Tract, and 2. continuing South 89°23'22" East, a distance of 157.99 feet to the Point of Beginning of this description; thence from said Point of Beginning, leaving said south line,the following six(6)consecutive courses and distances: 1. North 56°31'51" West, a distance of 1.17 feet, 2. along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, concave southerly, having a radius of 31.00 feet, through a central angle of 31°54'39", an are length of 17.27 feet, and a chord bearing North 72°29'10" West, a distance of 17.04 feet, 3. North 88°26'30" West, a distance of 48.63 feet, 4. along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, concave northerly, having a radius of 73.00 feet, through a central angle of 33°07'48", an arc length of 42.21 feet, and a chord bearing North 71°52'35" West, a distance of41.63 feet, 5. along the are of a reverse curve to the left, concave southerly, having a radius of 67.00 feet, through a central angle of 34°0403", an arc length of 39.84 feet, and a chord bearing North 72°20'43" West, a distance of 39.25 feet, and 6. North 89°22'44" West, a distance of 14.85 feet to a point on the easterly line of said ACHD Tract; May 19,2020 10-19-017 Ped Path Esmt.docx Page 1 of 2 a 250 S.Beechwood Avenue,Suite 201,Boise, ID 83709-0944 p 208-376-7330 f 208-323-9336 w www.jub.com thence North 00°37'16" East, coincident with said easterly line, a distance of 14.00 feet; thence leaving said easterly line,the following six(6) consecutive courses and distances: 1. South 89°22'44" East, a distance of 14.85 feet, 2. along the are of a tangent curve to the right, concave southerly, having a radius of 81.00 feet, through a central angle of 34°04'03", an are length of 48.16 feet, and a chord bearing South 72°20'43" East, a distance of 47.46 feet, 3. along the arc of a reverse curve to the left, concave northerly, having a radius of 59.00 feet, through a central angle of 33°07'48", an are length of 34.12 feet, and a chord bearing South 71°52'35" East, a distance of 33.64 feet, 4. South 88°26'30"East, a distance of 48.63 feet, 5. along the are of a tangent curve to the right, concave southerly, having a radius of 45.00 feet, through a central angle of 31°54'39", an are length of 25.06 feet and a chord bearing South 72°29'10" East, a distance of 24.74 feet, and 6. South 56°31'51" East, a distance of 22.84 feet to a point on the south line of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of said Section 25; thence North 89°23'22" West, coincident with said south line, a distance of 25.80 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing an area of 2,503 square feet of land, more or less. The above-described tract of land is shown on Exhibit"B", attached hereto and made a part hereof. End of Description. J-U-B ENGINEERS,Inc. This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of Timothy Harrigan, PLS,all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. LAND Timothy Harrig , LS 17665 17665 k� 5 19 'Lo� � OF Date HARD\ May 19,2020 10-19-017 Ped Path Esmt.docx Page 2 of 2 www.jub.com J-U-B ENGINEERS,Inc. POC 23 24 W. VICTORY RD. 26 25 SEE SHEET 2 FOR LEGEND AND r LINE/CURVE TABLES a ( E � r,� I M NI 0 0 o r N Of Lo Q cr- i, r OI w r J I x wI 0 of I i I 0 40 0 SCALE IN FEET i I m a I rn m in I (�L6 o E Y,�jj C4 I J Z ' L4 CS L7 C6 L1 L3' • - - - - - - C S89°23'22"E 157.99' L2 L9 POB �I LAND ;GENSF�sG�F 17665 in Cf u �T u V H a i ` r } w _ ,tj' 19�2oZc� EXHIBIT "B" EDGEHILL SUBDIVISION NO. 2 (�}B� PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY SHEET z A PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 25,T3N, R1W, BM 1 OF 2 1-U-BENGINEERs,INC. CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO a END LfNE TABLE — THIS SHEET ONLY - - - - SECTION LINE NO. BEARING DIST. — — — — — - ADJOINER PROPERTY LINE L1 S89'23'22"E 48.00' PEDESTRIAN PATH EASEMENT 0 AREA: 2,503f SO. FEET OF LAND L2 N56'31'51"W 1.17' 6 - SECTION CORNER L3 N88'26'30"W 48.63' L E L4 N89'22'44"W 14.85' - QUARTER CORNER L5 N00'37'16"E 14.00' O - FOUND 5/8-INCH REBAR o L6 S89'22'44"E 14.85' 0 - DIMENSION POINT L7 S88'26'30"E 48.63' POC - POINT OF COMMENCEMENT Ls s56'31'51"E 22.84' POB - POINT OF BEGINNING L9 N89'23'22"W 25.80' T 6 3 t O a m t x is I A O CURVE TABLE NO. RADIUS DELTA LENGTH CH. BEARING CH. DIST. Cl 31.00' 31'54'39" 17.27' N72'29'10"W 17.04' 13 C2 73.00' 33'07'48" 42.21' N71'52'35"W 41.63' J d C3 67.00' 34'04'03" 39.84' N72.20'43"W 39.25' C4 81.00, 34'04'03" 48.16' S72.20'43"E 47.46' a N C5 59.00' 33'07'48" 34.12' S71'52'35"E 33.64' z° C6 45.00' 31-54'39" 25.06' S72'29'10"E 24.74' IF v a a w n 0 I rn O p� LAND a � 17665 in pTyOFCL C A� � � .o EXHIBIT "B" EDGEHILL SUBDIVISION NO. 2 ( B� PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY SHEET A PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 25, T3N, R1 W, BM 2 OF 2 '¢ 1-U-B ENGINEERS,INC. CITY OF MERIDIAN COUNTY OF ADA STATE OF IDAHO a 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: jump Creek Subdivision Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 Page 92 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-117721 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=6 KRISTINA LOWRY 09/10/2020 10:53 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE Project Name(Subdivision): JUMP CREEK SUBDIVISION NO 4 Sanitary Sewer&Water Nlain Easement Number: 1 Identify this Easement by sequential number if Project contains more than one easement of this type. (See Instructions for additional information). SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made thisgth day of September 20 20 between OPEN DOOR RENTRALS LLC ("Grantor") and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water maing and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right- of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no farther effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs,personal representatives,purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on AI.tT$1�� (date) by (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if'signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of '-�i A G+u_k.- Vh-'Ar (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: Pywsiil (type of authority s i as officer or trustee) \\\����\%I�i i� i 1111/0 PpNIR KqZ,, W IY my EXPIRES COMMISSION Notary Signature !56-5-2022 My Commission Expires: OF ID S�ONNUMBER,o§\ Sanitary Sewer and GVtutggmfjV1AVement REV.0 1/0 1/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor Attest by Chris Johnson,City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO, ) . ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 9-8-2020 (date) by Robert E. S i m i s o n and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk,respectively. Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2022 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION FOR CITY OF MERIDIAN SEWER AND WATER LINE EASEMENT JUMP CREEK SUBDIVISION A the NE 1/4 of the SE 114 of Section 28, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho being more particularly described as follows; Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 28 from which the East 114 corner of said Section 28 bears North 00°31'08" East, 2637.33 feet; thence along the East boundary line of said Section 28 North 00'31'08" East, 1,629.07 feet; thence leaving said East boundary line North 89028'52"West, 48.00 feet to a point on the West right-of-way line of N. Black Cat Road, said point also being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence along said West right-of-way line South 00"31'08"West, 19.27 feet; thence leaving said West right-of-way line North 89028'52"West, 125.00 feet; thence North 00031'08" East, 36.97 feet; thence South 89028'52" East, 125.00 feet to a point on the West right-of-way line of N. Black Cat Road; thence along said West right-of-way line South 00031'08" West, 17.70 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. r �dsG ENSFD a 7729 �II?oZo OF CRY G-CP EXHIBIT B 1/4 S28 S27 i !I NI 01 0 S89'28'552"E 1.25.00' f of ��/ / ! ;7! / RPOB i7 VACATED SO 31 08 W- M z i cD ' W. TWISTED C N89'28'S2"W -o oz Iwa jri 48.00' mZ "�SO 3108W co o Ln tq FA Q f N89'28'52"W 125.00' o w Q o o a f zD : v 1 �1 IV) U ! w a .J J I Q m I � Z Z I ' I I Jv S28 S27 i I S33 S32 JL r 30 90 77 2 9 {) J 5, 60 N�r}�11�Z4Lo`rO SCALE: 1" = 30' ��\��r f»e�L.t. 1 1N—f��\rl.n I:•Irk fie.. 1 Allr�•�sr s/1 0 9�D9�1P U� IDAHO EXHIBIT __ DRAWING FOR �B NO. 18-198 SURVEY BL55''0 EMERALD,T CITY OF MERIDIAN SEWER AND WATER LINE EASEMENT SHEET NO. BOI SE,IDAHC 83701 84o-857G JUMP CREEK SUBDIVISION 1 (?JBJ GROUP, L LC LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 28, T.4N., RAW., DWG. DATE BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 4/1/2020 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: jump Creek Subdivision No. 4 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-117723 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 KRISTINA LOWRY 09/10/2020 10:54 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE Project Name(Subdivision): VACATION TWISTED CREEK STRff Sanitary Sewer&water Nlain Emement Number: 1 Identify this Fasemcnt by sequential number if Project contains more than one easement of this type. (Sec histructions for additional information). SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASENIf,NT THIS Easement Agreement, made this 8th day of September 20 20 between Jump Creek Subdivision HOA Inc ("Grantor") and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constnrcted by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV,01/01/2020 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right- of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs,personal representatives,purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: STATE OF IDAHO } s County of Ada } This record was acknowledged before me on .)S (date) by ,0"c4 etw► (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of L 4- (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: Men^be/ (type of authority such as officer or trustee) �� � etreee 6� fad MY COMMISSION Notary Signature EXPIRES 6-5-2022 My Commission Expires: �— e OF Sanitary Sewer ailf �lit REV.01/01/2020 �/111111111\\\ GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison,Mayor Attest by Chris Johnson,City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO, ) : SS. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 9-8-2020 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk,respectively. Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2022 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION FOR .LUMP CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 4 CITY OF MERIDIAN SEWER AND WATER LINE EASEMENT A portion the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 and the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 28, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the E1/4 corner of said Section 28 from which the NE corner of said Section 28 bears North 00°29'04" East, 2636.68 feet; thence along the East boundary line of said Section 28 North 00°29'04" East, 95.12 feet; thence leaving said East boundary line North 89021'48"West, 48.00 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 89°21'48"West, 42.44 feet; thence South 00038'12" West, 47.00 feet; thence North 89°21'48"West, 6.50 feet; thence North 00'38'12" East, 27.00 feet; thence North 89021'48"West, 151.16 feet; thence South 00"38'12"West, 27.00 feet; thence North 89021'48"West, 21.48 feet; thence North 00°38'12" East, 27.00 feet; thence North 89'21'48" West, 91.22 feet; thence South 50032'00"West, 32.50 feet; thence 46.64 feet along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the left, said curare having a radius of 125.00 feet, a central angle of 21°22'38" and a long chord which bears North 40°56'54" West, 46.37 feet; thence North 50032'00" East, 34.72 feet; thence South 39°28'00" East, 18.34 feet; thence North 73°02'00" East, 29.19 feet; thence North 00°38'12" East, 26.09 feet; Page 1 of 2 Item#7. thence South 89°21'48" East, 11.48 feet; thence South 00'38'12"West, 27.00 feet; thence South 89021'48" East, 161.18'feet; thence North 00038'12" East, 89.14 feet; thence North 89021'48"West, 29.25 feet; thence North 00038'12" East, 10.00 feet; thence South 89021'48" East, 84.00 feet; thence South 0003812" West, 10.00 feet; thence North 89021'48"West, 44.75 feet; thence South 00*38'12"West, 89.14 feet; thence South 89021'48" East, 119.55 feet; thence South 00°29'04"West, 10.00 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING, D� NSCL Q .pG ` 7729 �0 J'�3151zoto O OF 0A�� "vRY G.CP Page 2 of 2 CURVE TABLE W. CHINDEN BLVD. 21 22 CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CHORD DIST. CHORD BRG. DELTA - - - • Cl 125.00 46.64 46.37 N40'56'54"W 21'22'38" 28 27 S89'21'48"E I 84.00' I NO'38'12"E-� f—SO'38'1 lo 'co 00 Q N50'32'00"E N89'21'48"W �I `N89'21'48"W I NI N W 34,72' 29,25' �; �; 44.75' Ill I o S39'28'00"E co: 00Li 3 I i a 18.34' S89'21 48 E _ �, I D f 11.48' Q P SO'38'12"W ; I�n SO'29'04"W I z 27.00' of lb* 0 10.00' z (AI - _ S89'21'48"E 161.18' I SB9'21'48"E 119.55' �N89'21'48"W - l RPOB 91.22' I I N89'21'48"W 151.16 Q N O'38'12"E rJI 42.44' N I U �i 27.00' S0'38'12"W E__jl i SO'38'12"W �� V S50'32'00"W 27.00 27.00'� 47,00' rn Q 32.50' N89'21'48'W N89'21'48"W m 21.48' 6.50' c_ I 1/4 28 27 W. MALTA DR. Jv A& (� ;6'Noap�L a s LINE TABLE _ v 729 LINE LENGTH BEARING N� 3 y� OQ, L1 48.00 N89'21'48"W �F F of � c�Y G.CPS L2 29,19 N73'02'00"E L3 26.09 NO'38'12"E 10 60 180 0 30 120 SCALE: 1" = 60' ro,bu. ..n<10-•Tl\.. ,- ho. t ulr;l : n4. A 0'A 1.• A N/." EXHIBIT _ DRAWING FOR JDB NO. DAHO — ,s-22D 9955 W.EMERALD ST. JUMP CREEK SUB 4 SHEET NO. SURVEY ID0.1ros97o4(20M CITY OF MERIDIAN SEWER & WATERLINE EASEMENT 1 (20A1 BA8�0570 GROUP, LLC LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 AND THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION DWG. DATE 28. T.4N., RAW., BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 3/ 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Rackham Subdivision Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-117724 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=9 KRISTINA LOWRY 09/10/2020 10:54 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE Project Name(Subdivision): Rackham Subdivision Sanitary Sewer&Water Main Easement Number: Identify this Easement by sequential number if Praject contains more than one easement ofthis type. (See Instructions for additional information). SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made thisgth day Of September 20 20 between BVABC Eagle View,LLC ("Grantor") and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an casement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right- of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives,purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: BVABC Eagle View,LLC By: BV Management S es,.Inc.,the Executive Manager By: Co'rrrey,kiddiard,President STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Bonneville) This record was acknowledged before me on -•7- 0 (date) by Cortney Liddiard (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of BVABC Eagle View,LLC (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: President of the Executive Manager (type of authority such as officer or trustee) (stamp) 4 BRANDI LOVE Notary Signature COMMISSION NO. 37925 NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires: _ (a-aODA STATE OF IDAHO [MY COMMISSION EXPIRES O4412126 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 9-8-2020 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2022 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 2775 W.Navagator Drive,Suite 210 Meridian Idaho Office Meridian,Idaho 83642 TeL 208.463.4197 www,horrocks.corn HORROCKS Fax; 208,463,7561 11111 E N G I N E E R S A L Date. July 20, 2020 Project: ID-1336-1808 960 Page: 1 of 5 .ro ?p E"IBIT A DOMESTIC WA TER-SANA TAR Y SEWER EASEMENT RACKHAMSUBDIVISION This easement is situated in a portion of the N.E. % of the S.W. % and the N.W. 1/ of the S.W. 1/ of Section 16, Township 3 North,Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian, City of Meridian,Ada County Idaho,more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southeast corner of said N.W. '/ of the S.W. '/a; thence along the south boundary of said N.W. '/ of the S.W. %, 1) N.89°14°57"W., 17.12 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing, 2) N.89014'57"W., 20.00 feet;thence leaving said south boundary, 3) N.00007115"W., 25.42 feet;thence, 4) N.23000'25"W., 14.86 feet;thence, 5) S.19°04'47"W.,41.10 feet to a point on the south boundary of said N.E. '/ of the S.W. '/ ;thence along said south boundary, 6) N.89014'57"W., 21.17 feet;thence leaving said south boundary, 7) N.19°47'33"E., 31.51 feet; thence, 8) S.87°34'14"W., 315.89 feet; thence, 9) S.88°34154"W., 324.04 feet; thence, 10)N.89°14'57"W., 150.10 feet; thence, 11)N.47°43138"W., 64.14 feet; thence, 12)N,42°08'32"E.,20.00 feet; thence, HAD-1336-1808/Project Data/Survey/4.12 DescriptionsBxhibit A Sewer-Water Easement 072020 Date: July 20, 2020 Project: ID-13 36-180 8 Page: 2 of 5 13)S.47"43'38"E., 64.39 feet; thence, 14)N.88°34'54"E., 330.71 feet; thence, 15)N.00°37'01"E., 192.13 feet;thence, 16)N.89°06'48"W., 17.87 feet; thence, 17)N.00-22'14"W., 2 0.01 feet; thence, O ,c 18)5,89006'48"E., 18.21 feet; thence, j. 19)N.00°37'01"E., 29.33 feet; thence, ?r OF � 20)S.89°4713"E., 20.00 feet; thence, 21)5.00037 01"W., 240.89 feet; thence, 22)N.88°34'54"E., 109.17 feet; thence, 23)N.87°34'14"E., 320.85 feet; thence, 24)N.00°45'03"E., 153.99 feet; thence, 25)N.89°18'43"W., 22.41 feet; thence, 26)N.00°45'03"E., 20.00 feet; thence, 27)S.89118'43T.,22.41 feet; thence, 28)N.00°45'03"E., 9690 feet; thence, 29)N.89°14'57"W., 22.40 feet; thence, 30)N.00°45'03 T., 20.00 feet; thence, 31)S.89°14'57"E., 22.40 feet; thence, 32)N.00°45'03"E., 77.53 feet; thence, 33)N.89°14'57"W.,22,40 feet; thence, FrAD-1336-1808/Project Data/Survey/4.12 Descriptions/Exhibit A Sewer-Water Easement 072020 Date: July 20, 2020 Project: ID-1336-1808 Page: 3 of 5 34)N.00045'03"E.,20.00 feet; thence, am.► 35)S.89°14'57"E., 22.26 feet; thence, 6 'O 36)N,00°55'36"E., 329.95 feet; thence,BRCM 37)N.88°20'45"W., 25.90 feet;thence, 38)N.01°39'15"E., 20.00 feet; thence, 39)S.88°20'45"E., 37.77 feet; thence, 40)N.01°36'29"E., 87.45 feet; thence, 41)N.88°21'38"W., 39.97 feet; thence, 42)N.01038'22"E.,20.00 feet; thence, 43)S.88°21'38"E., 39.96 feet; thence, 44)N.0 1-3 6'29"E., 79.51 feet to a point on the southerly right-of-way of Interstate 84; thence along said right-of-way, 45)N.82°19'49"E., 20,27 feet; thence leaving said right-of-way, 46)S.01°36'29"W., 210.25 feet; thence, 47)N.88°20'45"W., 11.89 feet; thence, 48)S.00°55'36"W.,263.28 feet; thence, 49)S.89-14'57"E., 27.78 feet; thence, 50)S.00°45'03"W., 11.90 feet; thence, 51)S.89"08'48"E., 257.55 feet; thence, 52)N.00°45'03"E., 12.36 feet; thence, 53)S.89°14'57"E., 17.35 feet;thence, HAD-1336-1808/Project Data/Survey/4.12 Descriptions/Exhibit A Sewer-Water Easement 072020 Date: July 20, 2020 Project: ID-1336-1808 Page: 4 of 5 54)N.00°48'41"E., 11.18 feet; thence, 55)S.89009'02"E., 20.00 feet; thence, 56)S.00°48'41"W., 11.15 feet; thence, 57)S.89°14'57"E., 272.36 feet; thence, 58)N.00°02'39"W., 11.38 feet; thence, 59)N.14°42'29"W., 444.28 feet; thence, 60)N.06°50'42"W., 100.83 feet to a point on said right-of-way; thence along said right-of- way, 61)N.82"19149"E., 20.00 feet; thence leaving said right-of-way, 62)S.06.5 0'41 T., 102.29 feet; thence, 63)N.75°17'31"E., 12.18 feet; thence, 64)S.14°42'29"E., 20.00 feet; thence, 65)S.75.17'31"W., 11.83 feet; thence, 66)S.14°4229"E., 422.95 feet;thence, tom" 6 67)S.00°02'39"E., 25.33 feet; thence, Z� 68)S.89 08 48 E., 7.97 feet; thence, ' )r OF DRO 69)S.00"02'39"E., 21.85 feet; thence, 70)N.89°08'48"W.,611.54 feet; thence, 71)S.00°45'03"W., 13.77 feet; thence, 72)S.89-32110"E., 10.00 feet;thence, 73)5.00°45'03"W., 20.00 feet; thence, 74)N.89°32'10"W., 10.00 feet; thence, HAD-1336-1808/Noject Data/Survey/4.12 Descriptions/Exhibit A Sewer-Water Easement 072020 Date: July 20, 2020 Project: ID-1336-1808 Page: 5 of 5 75)S.00°45'03"W., 93.25 feet;thence, 76)S.89"16'25"E., 24.65 feet; thence, 77)5.00°45'03"W., 20.00 feet; thence, 78)N.89"16'25"W., 24.65 feet;thence, 79)S.00°45'03"W., 97.79 feet; thence, o�AL LAAfo 80)S.89°23'13"E., 26.66 feet; thence, 8 1)SA 8960O°45'03"W., 20.D0 feet;thence, a' � 82)N.89-23'14"W., 17.16 feet; thence, 1tFOF 83)S.00°45'03"W., 6.52 feet; thence, 84)N.89°14'57"W.,9.50 feet;thence, 85)S.00°45'03'W., 140.72 feet; thence, 86)S.23°00'25"E., 11.30 feet; thence, 87)S.89°16'32"E., 1277.72 feet; thence, 88)S.00°42'44"W.,20.00 feet; thence, 89)N.89°16'32"W., 1268.57 feet; thence, 90)S.00°0715"E., 30.61 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. H-AD-1336-1808/Project Data/Survey/4,12 Descriptions/Exhibit A Sewer-Water Easement 072020 _ o z a Z r vi, y OR a$ U N }tl] LY Z J H us 6 q4q z Q" C7 cL Py, Q) ui gi N G: mU0 �L, W W LL � � z �z ? � o a 3a c�z to d� o u. >LJ a.a. to a ui f I Lo_ � Ul 4 o a o I p P VVWI a ?� cm "s �my� T� w H, zN nI m A <i z 0 co z � m� m $2� w z lz e' 9 ! Z a0 p g W o m $ L'ur m 14_9�4_a.ss. os C —Z- m a Cl) m = Z 2 a 6 {u Z X z Minier Z 2N o I V z mR I I W Lo C I � O �w z CU Z z 0 ku UQ z g N m z en .�2 s N � Lu; V � [V V 7yp 'fit V y ry 0 Vj �Cl x �a 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Shelburne East Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer Easement No. 1 Page 115 Project Name(Subdivision): ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-117729 SHELBURNE EAST SUBDIVISION NO 1 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 09/10/2020 10:55 AM Sanitary Sewer Easement Number: ONE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE Identify this Easement by sequential number if Project contains more than one sanitary sewer easement. (See Instructions for additional information). SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made this 8th day of e tp ember, 2020 between Penp,-L�c/LC ("Grantor"), and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. Sanitary Sewer Easement REV. 01/01/2020 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right- of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: STATE OF IDAHO } ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 4c 1 "Q1d (date) by A S S cle,Ilyo (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity:_ 02c7tA g r.r _(type of authority such as officer or trustee) saw WN COMMISSION#32341 !VOTARY PUBLIC NotarySignature STATE OF IDAHO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES a7/2&2023 My Commission Expires: c QZ Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/0 1/2020 Item#9. GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison,Mayor Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO, ) . ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 9-8-2020 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature 3-28-2022 My Commission Expires: Sanitary Sewer Easement REV. 01/01/2020 Legal Description Ci1y of Meridian Sanitary Sewer Easement Shelburne East Subdivision No. I An easement located in the NW % of the SE % of Section 28, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a 1 inch diameter iron pin monument marking the northeast corner of the SE % (Center % corner) of said Section 28, from which an Aluminum cap monument marking the northeast corner of said SE % bears S 89023'16" E a distance of 2656.47 feet; Thence S 0°29'30" W along the westerly boundary of said SE % a distance of 442.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence leaving said boundary S 89021'05" E a distance of 139.89 feet to a point on a curve; Thence a distance of 33.99 feet along the arc of a 55.00 foot radius non-tangent curve left, said curve having a central angle of 35°24'37" and a long chord bearing S 52d38'06" E a distance of 33.45 feet to a point; Thence N 890 21 05„ W a distance of 166.65 feet to a point on the wester) boundary of said SE p Y rY Thence along said boundary N 0029'30" E a distance of 20.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 3,007 square feet (0.069 acres) more or less and is subject to any other easements existing or in use. Vincent Blommer, PLS Land Solutions, PC August 28, 2020 ����N�L. FOSG w , a 13 5 0 ZD. O G �ZC�4 0P� rFOF1Q FM' BL� City of Meridian Sewer Easement l.an, b1LAjons (,� .and Surveying and Consulting Shelburne East Subdivision No. 1 Job No.18-84 Page 1 of 1 uTY OF MERIDIAN SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT SHELBURNE EAST SUBDIVISION NO. 1 LOCATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 28, T.3N., R.1E., B.M. MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO BASIS OF BEARING CEN 1/4 _N89'23'16_W 2656.47' _ 28 27 E 1/4 co y�0 L LA NO i N \ 0 O C i c. 1 2 6 CD tiCTF OF oon �T 5 V' POINT OF BEGINNING I 3,007 SF ��—S89'21'05"E 139.89' w- N89'21I05"W SS 0 166.65' ERNE EP in;`', p�SEp SN pN N4 N C1 CE BOTT LN. I! i I a � to w J o 0 0' 90' 180' 360' W. AMITY ROADMIIIIIIIIIIIII 28 27 33 34 CURVE TABLE Lan �lutions CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA BEARING CHORD Lind Surveying and Consulting C1 33.99' 55.00' 35.24'37" S52'38'06"E 33.45' 231 E.5TH ST.,STE.A MERIDIAN,ID 83642 (208)288-2040 (208)288-2557 fax www.landsolutions.biz JOB NO.18-84 Item#10. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Shelburne East Subdivision No. 1 Water Main Easement No. 3 Proiect Name(Subdivision): Shelburne East Subdivion no 1 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-117730 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 09/10/2020 10:55 AM Water Main Easement Number: 3 CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE Identify this Easement by sequential number if Project contains more than one Water Main easement. (See Instructions for additional information). WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made this 8th day of September 20 20 between ("Grantor"), and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the water main is to, be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any Ver ion 01/01/20� Water Mom Easement s public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: STATE OF IDAHO } ss County of AdaAZO ) This record was acknowledged before me on 4 , (date) by In (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of �A 'ec,d"-zaG (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: (type of authority such as officer or trustee) (stamp) KENT BROWN COMMISSION#32341 Notary Signature NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires:Jw./y,,73, 2032:5 STATE OF IDAHO [KIyOOMMISSION EXPIRES 07/23/2=2 Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison,Mayor Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 9-8-2020 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature 3-28-2022 My Commission Expires: Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 Legal Description City of Meridian Water Easement Shelburne East Subdivision No. 1 An easement located in the NW %4 of the SE % of Section 28, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a 1 inch diameter iron pin monument marking the northeast corner of the SE (Center % corner) of said Section 28, from which an Aluminum cap monument marking the northeast corner of said SE % bears S 89023'16" E a distance of 2656.47 feet; Thence S 89d23'16" E along the northerly boundary of said SE Y4 a distance of 433.18 feet to a point; Thence leaving said boundary S 16027'23" E a distance of 400.27 feet to a point; Thence S 48041'23" E a distance of 255.58 feet to a point; Thence S 10°21'31 n E a distance of 274.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing S 10021'31" E a distance of 20.05 feet to a point; Thence S 75026'03" W a distance of 125.50 feet to a point on a curve; Thence a distance of 21.47 feet along the arc of a 123.50 foot radius non-tangent curve left, said curve having a central angle of 9057'45" and a long chord bearing N 35d43'54" W a distance of 21.45 feet to a point; Thence N 75d26'03" E a distance of 134.72 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 2,596 square feet (0.060 acres) more or less and is subject to any other easements existing or in use. Vincent Blommer, PLS NpL L N Land Solutions, PC �O O August 28, 2020 o a 6 0 ID OF I0'0� BLdl3� City of Meridian Water Easement ding Shelburne East Subdivision No. 1 �—Land Surveying and Consulting Job No.18-84 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER EASEMENT SHELBURNE EAST SUBDIVISION NO. 1 LOCATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 28, T.3N., R.1E., B.M. MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO BASIS OF BEARING 28 27 CEN 1/4 S89'23'16"E 433.18' _N89'23'16"W 2656.47' E 1/4 `ONpt.LA lyps i , £RFG�L I 4 O 1 w= a 12 6 � OF \ 1 �BURNE S C4 PRpppSUgD�S N Np 1 CV S � I` o o to _ SN Lnn W BOTT LN. 1 POINT OF BEGINNING I 2,596 SF S10'21'31"E 20.05' 1 a S�526,p3 W FA IW LLI O -D U n 0' 90' 180' 360' 28 27 W. AMITY ROAD 33 34 CURVE TABLE CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA BEARING CHORD ELan4?lUtions veying and Consulting C1 21.47' 123.50' 957'45" N35'43'54"W 21.45' 231 E. IA ,ID 8364STE.A MERIDIAN,ID 83642 (208)288-2040 (208)288-2557 fax www.landsolutions.biz JOB NO.16-8a E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Shelburne East Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 2 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-117731 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 09/10/2020 10:55 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE Project Name(Subdivision): SHELLBURNE EAST SUBDIVISION NO 1 Sanitary Sewer&Water Main Easement Number: 2 Identify this Easement by sequential number if Project contains more than one easement of this type. (See Instructions for additional information). SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made this 8thday ofSeptember 2020 between SHELLBURNE PROPERTIES LLC("Grantor") and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: 2A C::�� — 61241 STATE OF IDAHO } ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on/i<:; 7A7,,ZO(date) by&j4(5 C410N0 (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: /7;r.,,���cl- (type of authority such as officer or trustee) (stamp) Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3 Sanitary Sewer Easement REV. 01/01/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 9-8-2020 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature My Commission Expires- Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 Legal Description City of Meridian Sanitary Sewer & Water Easement Shelburne East Subdivision No. 1 An easement located in the NW % of the SE % of Section 28, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a 1 inch diameter iron pin monument marking the northeast corner of the SE %4 (Center % corner) of said Section 28, from which an Aluminum cap monument marking the northeast corner of said SE % bears S 89023'16" E a distance of 2656.47 feet; Thence S 0029'30" W along the westerly boundary of said SE % a distance of 662.47 feet to a point; Thence S 1014'19" E a distance of 127.81 feet to a point; Thence S 0°33'18" W a distance of 176.80 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence S 89021'05" E a distance of 147.59 feet to a point; Thence S 0038'55" W a distance of 40.00 feet to a point; Thence N 89021'05" W a distance of 147.52 feet to a point; Thence N 0033'18" E a distance of 40.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Said easement contains 5,902 square feet (0.135 acres) more or less and is subject to any other easements existing or in use. Vincent Blommer, PLS Land Solutions, PC August 28, 2020 O ¢ 6 O a � Z� zv CA4 OF%DP�� BLd� City of Meridian Sewer&Water Easement Land Surveying and Consulting Shelburne East Subdivision No. 1 Job No. 18-84 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN SANITARY SEWER & WATER EASEMENT SHELBURNE EAST SUBDIVISION NO. 1 LOCATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 28, T.3N., R.1E., B.M. MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO BASIS OF BEARING—CEN 1/4 _N89'23'16"W 2656.47' 28 27 E 1/4 PL LA Nps ( �y5 1 S RF G,p o 1 256 0 CN OF b \0 O C \ 10 (/) \ ico 8 RNE EPS� \ LO 1 IN EL PROPOS�B�pS\ON NO' 1 3 0 CE BOTT N. S1'14'19"E -- I 127.81 ( IPOINT OF BEGINNING 0 � �, i 5 902 IF v 147.59' Z � S89'21'05"E ` W N89'21 05 W SO'38 55 W 00 0 147.52' 40.00' o Z` 1 � \ W. AMITY ROAD 2s 27 0' 90' 180' 360' 33 34 LLa:n ?1utionsLandveying and Consulting 231 E.5TH ST.,STE.A MERIDIAN,ID 83642 (208)288-2040 (208)288-2557 fax www.landsolutions.biz d08 NO.18-84 Page 132 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Plat for Victory Commons (H-2020-0086) by BVA Development, Located at 130 E.Victory Rd. STAFF REPORT C� W IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING 9/8/2020 Legend + l DATE: f IPA Lflcaior TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Alan Tiefenbach,Associate Planner 208-489-0573 Bruce Freckleton,Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2020-0086 - r Victory Commons Final Plat Es LOCATION: The site is located at 130 E. Victory Rd. - and 3030 S. Meridian Rd.,in the ' southwest'/4 of Section 19,T.3N. R.IE. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final Plat consisting of 4 commercial lots on 16.74 acres in the C-G zoning district. This is the first of two phases,with a total of 12 lots. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Owner Kuna Victory,LLC—901 Pier View Dr., Suite#210,Idaho Falls, ID 83402 B. Representative: BVA Development,2775 W.Navigator Dr., Suite#220,Meridian ID 83642 III. STAFF ANALYSIS The preliminary plat for this development was approved by City Council on June 9,2020. The preliminary plat consisted of 12 commercial lots on 16.74 acres, several of which already include buildings presently under construction including an urgent care, flex building and a paint store. This first phase consists of four lots on 5.81 acres. Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat in accord with the requirements listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. All development shall comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the C-G zoning district as well as Development Agreement#2019-119405. Pagel Because the size and configuration of the first four lots is consistent with the approved preliminary plat, staff finds the proposed final plat is in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. However,there are still several outstanding issues. A condition of approval of the preliminary plat was that prior to signature on the final plat for this phase,the applicant shall grant cross access to parcels#R5915720030,R5915720042 and R6242270030(parcels to the south and east of the property)but staff has yet to see proof of this access. Also,a 25' wide buffer is required to be installed along E. Victory Rd prior to occupancy of the first structure per the development agreement. It does not appear this buffer has been completed. Finally,there is also a 35' landscape buffer required along S. Meridian Rd,an entryway corridor. This buffer is to be measured from the ultimate right-of-way as anticipated by the transportation agencies in accord with UDC 11-3B-7CI.c. Plat Note No. 13 states this results in a 16.5' wide landscape buffer which was established by measuring 35' from existing back of curb (meaning much of the landscaping is within ITD right-of- way). The applicant shall be required to obtain a ROW license agreement from ITD to install and maintain this buffer prior to signature on the final plat. IV. DECISION Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat within the conditions noted in Section VI of this report. Page 2 Item#12. V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(date: 11/20/19) F G r u 6 I 3 ` ■OC/f f@fXOF Nii4Mii �I Wllil9i ran � il� v I + I I I 'r� @ rl •4 1k � _ � I llIRI !JO 74 k~`y � Q I J// roim mw�waonwral F �_ —\\\ rAF- � / I .li„ m O m I I r :�' o I r i �! IYV a r F I '!! so9-422xw 27.a' I r Ile reiM4234s' ,a.v+' _ f b Page 3 B. Final Plat(date: 6/23/2020) ud Y.1JVGLYIILNI0.IL:Y In hG WT � e.,• a..e LwmumMraa$,nSl-Dye rTUA EC? Of A PORPOr': OF GOVERNMENT LOr 4r TOWS ° RANGE EAST OF THE SURE hd 9 e3''ki —2020- 13 {3O.5+T LOT 3 r 2 I ' (r?. C. {Fdi� �{ RA.& H�9'4w4#•Ewl�bT' Pl&60' � iesveuwwrNT �y _ ��{ �i dp i� 2 4 hl 1-22 AC * ' LA �} w ' ! O k # F # LL 5..lt aLKEMLOruarzRu Ives Na.s a®I it x h N _ u Mir pTp2pkWhrr Fi i�t,oaeosz s...rr„ 1.01 AC_ 3 morw*LKLAmwwr I lime 4 x �q 2.42 . � • f� � r�aisawz�z��, r�keba r{ 'rayMEW 7r i r ac. GCVT.CT 4 1 $ [iir.Fii[a+vs rac-u,alEiii�.�i . . � It' °+EACH OWI LfJT4 E.Y](:7n)HY ROAD PI.Lkm ! Page 4 C. Final Plat Easement Exhibit Showing Landscaping/Sidewalk Easements(date: 6/23/2020) w aN a,e SUUA TED fN A ROR77ON OF 5E wLio2lrnuwnurorPwlro OOVERNUENT LOT 4, TOWS`IF MWMWrcAM,PL5LLWWE RANGE P EAST OF THE ROf.SE MER. CAhF,191dtlF �LdERYD�AN, ADA COUNTY, ! .� .tAcncs PLAG£S�J6�PlJSAOif BOOK TdF,PAGES TI 7M-0-,= — 0 0— GZ VT LOT 3 EL[rN 2 I+ 339'AI44'h �e Q AIL'A'Oh ThBMVET �9'ili'4f44 a• 471' a,F NBP41V4E 1 _ _ 5,1$ - - -C� 76.OR k — ti FF IyP f M13'1A'37W �} - N Il {' i5se r r'�~Yx E.19' I S:Al.e y7v,W41'W elf'. l 1 I �% I iLDs w� � �, R I I LOT sEs'sa'3215' — I BLOCK lea' Nss2v93'E r 83T5H7 - ,� eo9 °F� I / N5E•®91E 3,W I ' 111.117 I 3: w I ! LOT2 I i BLOCK 1 I � I I I Curve Table C.WM4 Lines Flu vcm Cho,tl 6rECUX = . I / OS 19.5E' 93.6Q 11•5 Nfi'25'0ti5' - CS 59ID' 11MEr 2924"& 5E922'24'W - I I I +J� 07 32f0' S7.91 32 '42'12 S�'1 677ti5' q i PLOT C33 E1A3' 57.91 6P4l'33' N5E'W3rW k I I BLOC !.} C73 21b2 11RW 11.2E15' N30'34'331Y - � I I CID 14.0E' U 9,4595' N14'11'13'W 1 70-ce Gil 9.9V SEEM' 0,47Ur rarlu1C•W I —— NBW21. 2i —— 8BB'31'23'E — C12 21.71' 1M Nr 11'4719• 521.15'9rE 2 1 12.21' C13 19.ET 991II 11.29S�r S20'34'02E 1 ` P.QC.--\ PARCEL 6 PER RELLGR6 C14 933E' L798' ST22W S7E'04TrE 7 3 t 0F5&W EYXT^y30F GPFF.P2W1)M"E2 &#+ 5•�9 Cis E2.9T 12911' 27^J936' N68109fi7rE E Q S-2}� GPdF.711 424 YJ �772f iT90.{i9 � C16 231W MOT 13E3W NE'3T14-W 2 PJ1959P SE.CMGu iL; g I E.VWCTORY ROAD P..,B,eEW rage j D. Final Plat Landscape Plan North(date: 7/28/2020) TPEE MMGAMGN NOTES PLANT SCHEDULE ��• .. � '' �'•a '�' 1'.s�. u ixc s -nNl nwaR[rrcm�,�u w.+xx cW y 4:'..\. r::.• 11E cvm����m r�uor�. lAG i4£ w.i gesn,.i..'caxekeee' -`?l✓, ':.:`v`.� -[i'SY^ft. [aa-xa+mavnx um�,i��;rt wp. �y �':•.�,, .' .• .•E.: f{{ cx E�[Mnrmat urc mwm¢�r ��+.,.. w��. _+..." -nS•'rx trmwncx"'�"-mcc.,'w�*,w�. , r�1 cK .w i x il. .- •. -f61 a-u�i w"�ic[c5u..t`Jiw.wl-no wrcwnox xa.Enm] t ' ab.,rmk -Itl e-GL FW IN.2WGJ]YNc-a NmYTCN fEL.YE]] -•.l; -1,1 x•e•L[airoxncc°fie:-xc rnv�attr n¢aiNy; b Hn w..^�0+ ..Y ' ��..� � u•r +Y of nw i amiu 17 wulm,v.LP1 x eoivxx I axrcn k..[ - o au a cxc m ex np ry w h n.W rR Mm trEa c e'er w r GENEB WIGATIGNH 5-AGENL SUBMRAL m,e a�wcc� r�n. .Xe � • v� i.: .�•.�,:.. ,. En n �ax. 6 r.�.,. m MM .,ewe aL ' x E =1nx IXI ,ate q �dnr, t � •.r. - f.9u [ae �'h•.,e 1 E � 'i�.�` � ...�a,~�.�E.T �,xE�n�xEk�,a ;. ---- - I s`.� �- - `�.•'�\ EE=VEIOPEEt LnHoscnaE nRcirEEcr lt fi \\ 41L BPtrPE GL41EA G114 TABLE vnvmp LF.FFCfAf8 BEA^F3iWU" wmq7 BAG, FECUPWAINM _ , ,' •t ... —�], \ I `-`\ >AEx MG SR m, 2' µ w trees.ale iorn k 9s W c encNo¢ 1. �.•: [ReN,mtld I-Lit rorMLF.., a E" 1 � � �'• ��\ '/ � �'-;�,.:.,-. \ � .,ems,. -.".�••,..� r.:EE—E1"gym: ,;ac�ro. I—I. vixi acE�ff6. , P.ENm r � _ l6i��E LANDSCAPE PLAN-AREAONE e WdE r.aew� Page 6 D. Final Plat Landscape Plan South(date: 7/28/2020) - •.l: � I . - .,: �Ill•;,�I''' '"'�� I cg � .... ..._. 11r; � 1 I ,. � ��� ..y f � III• {II f r 5� N��P�WP�11e1m67 �� � 1 .— � � aoranwrrrwwannr�cr � I I N6tAMRG�7lRFFAWr l I I f I igFAANFaF11�Hg6C1 - /'/-.' �"�� •I �- .. - - .,' .. •m,� �- M1TAlIM74`R4i fi0.l.'-CT TG rl C'' G u �• i r i� �. 4� 4� f 4 !�,...........r..... ..�.�. i E NCr9Rr RLl Page 7 VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division 1. All development shall comply with the terms of the approved preliminary plat(H-2019- 0150),Development Agreement(Inst. 2019-119405) and any future amendments to that agreement as applicable. 2. Direct lot access is prohibited to S. Meridian Road and E.Victory Road. 3. Prior to signature on the plat,the applicant shall provide a recorded cross agreement or add a plat note that grants cross access to parcels#R5915720030,R5915720042 and R6242270030 in accord with the amended development agreement. 4. A 25-foot wide landscape buffer along E. Victory Road shall be constructed prior to occupancy of the first structure in accord with the amended development agreement. The landscape buffer shall be installed in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C. 5. The landscape plan prepared by Baer Design Group, dated 7/28/2020, is approved as submitted. 6. The final plat prepared by Fritz Brownell,Horrocks Engineers, dated 6/23/20 is approved with the following comments: a. On the face of the plat insert the recorded water and pedestrian easement numbers. b.Note#11, 12 and 15—insert instrument numbers. 7. The required landscape buffers along Meridian and Victory Roads shall be measured from the ultimate right-of-way as anticipated by the transportation agency in accord with UDC 11-3B- 7Cl.c. The applicant shall be required to obtain a ROW license agreement from ITD to install and maintain the buffer along S. Meridian Road prior to signature on the final plat. 8. If the City Engineer's signature has not been obtained on the final plat within two(2)years of the City Council's approval of the subject preliminary plat(June 23,2022),the preliminary plat shall become null and void unless a time extension is obtained as set forth in UDC 11- 613-7. 9. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 10. All future structures constructed within the development shall to comply with the elevations in the amended development agreement,the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and those in the Architectural Standards Manual. 11. Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Administrative Design Review applications are required to be submitted to the Planning Division for approval of all future buildings on the site prior to applying for a building permit. Page 8 B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions: 1. This phase of the development will result in a long deadend water main which may result in poor water quality. Looping the water system back to Victory Rd as shown in the Preliminary Plat will eliminate this issue. 2. Public Works Department suggests the elimination of the proposed parallel water main off of Meridian Rd by utilizing the existing water main in the driveway entrance.The proposed water meter and hydrant could be connected off of the existing water main. 3. Is the new proposed hydrant near Meridian Rd needed?There is an existing hydrant just south of the driveway entrance. General Conditions: 4. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department,and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 5. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 6. All improvements related to public life,safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 7. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff,the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 8. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 9. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 10. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City.The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. Page 9 Page 142 Item#12. 11. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life,non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 12. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 13. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 14. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 15. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 16. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 17. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 18. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 19. The applicant's design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 20. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 21. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 22. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2" x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. Page 10 Page 143 Item#12. 23. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 24. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non- domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 25. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 26. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 9-1-28.C.1).The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available,a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 27. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Page 11 Page 144 Item#13. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Order for Aegean Estates No. 2 (H-2020-0084) by Becky McKay, Engineering Solutions, LLP, Generally Located South of the Five Mile Creek, East of N. McDermott Rd. Page 145 Item#13. BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: AUGUST 25, 2020 ORDER APPROVAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT ) CONSISTING OF 24 BUILDING ) CASE NO. H-2020-0084 LOTS AND 6 COMMON LOTS ON ) 8.33 ACRES OF LAND IN THE R-4 ) ORDER OF CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT FOR AEGEAN ) APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT ESTATES SUBDIVISION NO. 2 ) BY: SHARI STILES, ) ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS,LLP ) APPLICANT ) This matter coming before the City Council on August 25, 2020 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of"PLAT SHOWING AEGEAN ESTATES SUBDIVISION NO. 2, LOCATED IN THE S. 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 4N., RANGE 1 W., B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2020, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 6/11/20,by CLINTON W. HANSEN, PLS, SHEET 1 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR AEGEAN ESTATES SUBDIVISION NO. 2—FP H-2020-0084 Page 1 of 3 OF 3," is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated August 25, 2020, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked "Exhibit A" and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Shari Stiles, Engineering Solutions, LLP, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked "Exhibit B" and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR AEGEAN ESTATES SUBDIVISION NO. 2—FP H-2020-0084 Page 2 of 3 Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian,pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight(28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 8th day of September , 2020. By: Robert E. Simison Mayor, City of Meridian Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon the Applicant,Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 9-8-2020 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR AEGEAN ESTATES SUBDIVISION NO. 2—FP H-2020-0084 Page 3 of 3 Item#13. EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 8/25/2020 Legend 74 DATE: Project Lcou-Run -15 TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: H-2020-0084 Aegean Estates No. 2 RU T LOCATION: East side of N. McDermott Rd., 1/4 mile south of W. McMillan Rd. (south of the Five Mile Creek), in the NW 1/4 of RUT Section 33,Township 4N.,Range 1 W. TT- 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat consisting of 24 buildable lots and 6 common lots on 8.33 acres of land in the R-4 zoning district. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Shari Stiles, Engineering Solutions,LLP— 1029 N. Rosario St., Ste. 100,Meridian, ID 83642 B. Owner: Endurance Holdings,LLC— 1977 E. Overland Rd.,Meridian, ID 83642 C. Representative: Same as Applicant III. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat(H-2017-0114)in accord with the requirements listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. In order for the proposed final plat to be deemed in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-3C.2,the number of buildable lots cannot increase and the amount of common area cannot decrease. Staff has reviewed the proposed plat and the number of buildable lots has decreased by one (1)and the common open space has increased with the addition of a common lot between Lots 21 and 23, Block 1 for subsurface storm water drainage. Therefore, Pagel Staff deems the proposed final plat to be in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. IV. DECISION Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions noted in Section VI of this report. V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(dated: 7/31/2017) ATE -_� r, 'al ___ -r ��t- -'vim__• ' jl�..?i it i + '-hti'�ti!'--��_ j+ 1 'i h» ypu.Nrins n4�%�.�F..`4 i�a.. . v _ -- -- - ----- ' ---- L�7 , .sEs sir z of rca Id—.vo d F '� ^i smEEr sEmxrr=. e F,l zz77 �. ♦ 3 r— -__------------_ _ _._ _-_ _.—YET•--. .• icri�Nr•t�dbi6_ �•L==.Y•i� mfrtm F v.Inh+� i i RUT i i P;:z m..W PRE-1 B. Final Plat(dated: 6/11/20) PLAT SH91ANr, k3g_ PAGE S } OF 7HE kW Ifi OF SECTION 33, TAN., R.1V1, 9 V, m=R07AN, AAA COUNTT, IDAHO _ a a_Ir w h1.G 2929 —SIR•■[ n —G6hL tiwa LK Four a `'. hit � i wr,Y Yrw.a.IL I,Ilr.r,nti Fc�r .a -__ �-�k.� I., wx[P w mum wmL w 7 y LVLr44Er+PT aY YR h■.rrr. BOX TIL.KOF, ■ Hm �r Id { � i --- i■r PF+I r~h rt,-•iMNn l7WM1 tiL` I!"'� T']f•� _■- aurr �� .. 1, �+t .' ir,•rW°no.•:"`nwr:yc .l s�7F7 + �;�„ :L` Ylo-&4i� .042Mom' q , .! *} ` 'y4tiy k ' -■ �M' n � �wrn..w��vs aayu�.� ILIA OrAYy'2m in• t,cr i..++aa r •++ A T� '.a - �# '1' v xr:ws OfLt J/'Nfi-- �•`} Pf _ 6 x F! ��i}• ilmadt�x 'i r•r."4"w••L .VZ +�k Iw-4 r{,..,, I .y�y ■F W � 4! rfrl4'WY IL# ���.ry�a„�`i F a4 I�TiI ` .,,i � '_i' • R -#�'!�71C ��F. ,:i;r.:ydr,V.p k A qw7a, 'n,¢ iR 1w° w=uwrtu'1i`yu�id 9NuTI@ . v+ . aa.+w.xu.ra 111m r.r.e..allRxw . oI terror R Via+ m rr1.�l* rY• IRL 7u•IC UAL T#1[ 4 IPC L 4►�Llr I■L'llfx 74�/l4�'-Tx ,�■¢TrOy hT rW n M y1•[�l•Iih h�!Lx:�■Lrlr■i1 I. nr L5 UM 1,r5e f+141 ', .`o"j" '-r.'4=i:1' `w'�r.*:.0 F■1M L nna■ L.Ikf■LCW Ix�iWi �L CGMd J16�` a�,Ei L4sAl1 Aatl-L IQSa RLfF�. :Nr. -hF l,L-WI..[7!1[■,I lyi+W*=•Sl .-rL un +`■ fs •mr' Ji.'l!' Y.,Ir■ i.0 .4 or s+o- -�! FY .r ri.rL ia• .vr a ••+'>'tl..rt.Io.XY••L+�r+wl tat-a.a ltls .I VF �� arcaT ��••.. w .. ++Irfrl■41...•� 4[t'•4 RVu•L. F�11r�L-' - W ••4l LM „2 r+r oti 'YIF T.P Ir+dF TYW -W.I. L • � L sas`. i4 MM 1iAF .Y'!'wT IF1r,ArF ILA P mi, rw+ i► w Ml.+f'+ 1[Nr[1YFM O,.I-rlxl rl[�i�If. K,v W W .aY6, .JrJS ww w IMIM4lt; rlL9r• N m. a, 11+ ♦+af+ w. nM rra aq L- ]Yr Vrt+FT'• 1e XI '/}Wie-• ,a,r.r as• w{r ..I-c�a +•{.r JY .+malti U1 .v•.ati •v '-P� vwlr Kiw.a! Iy.r 4•M' tAfSF .-I.-W. „ o. �•„nr. Lr rrati ,,,r' r,V- _wr-L ...r w SFr- ,mow r...r v` "'�� ra ,no7 •.Y .Ir.YaY a 11r nr _.y Ex41xIaXS oroQn-urp wwatc was-„ate R1.av x-.r ate yq��eTA a+,S+nTL�t+ 1aY a4f W.Fir .IM.rfa Y4+r p auk: .r5 1� s�x.���.e�Frr�� +air . - T 4f 3 Page 3 C. Landscape Plan(dated: 06/30/2020) PUNS I { `i� _ J ►.sips _ JA f - - 114 ED rp .IJ + f I I �~l`-k�•rf� - �.-__ J • I;: �a F:if1.. a:.A Li r ti •. .�� 1ILI: -fir al rCP AT I a L. �ar�re VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the approved annexation(Development Agreement-Inst. #2017-116562) and preliminary plat(H-2017-0114)applications approved for this site. 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the subject final plat within two years of the City Engineer's signature on the previous phase final plat; or apply for a time extension,in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by Engineering Solutions,LLP, stamped by Clinton W.Hansen, dated: 6/11/2020,included in Section V.B shall be revised as follows: a. Include the recorded instrument number of the existing ACHD permanent easement in the Legend. b. Note#11: Include Lot and Block numbers that are servient to and contain the ACHD storm water drainage system. c. Note#12: Include the recorded instrument number of the ACHD License Agreement. A copy of the revised plat shall be submitted for City Engineer signature. 5. The landscape plan prepared by Jensen Belts Assoc., dated 06/30/2020, included in Section V.C, is approved as submitted. 6. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer,the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster, Sue Prescott, at 887-1620 for more information. 7. All fencing shall comply with the standards of UDC 11-3A-7C. 8. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions: 1. The street light plan submitted with the construction plans appear to meet city requirements based on a preliminary review. The type 1 streetlights on McDermott need to be placed over McDermott Road, and not the entry road. 2. A Floodplain Development Permit is required. A hydraulic study was completed for The Oaks Subdivision.Phase#1 of this development has no buildings in the floodplain.The permit is needed for site work. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay the Oaks Lift Station and Pressure Sewer Reimbursement Fees in the amount of$265.25 per building lot. The aggregate amount of the reimbursement fees for the entire preliminary plat area must be paid prior to city signatures on the first final plat. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay required to pay the Oaks Lift Station Pump Upgrades Reimbursement fees in the amount of$185.43 per building lot. The aggregate amount of the Page 5 reimbursement fees for the entire preliminary plat area must be paid prior to city signatures on the first final plat. General Conditions: 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer,an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements,prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy,a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans.This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility,or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2"x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed,and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at(208)888- 5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. Page 7 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 9-1-28.C.1).The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. EXHIBIT B From: Shari Stiles To: Sonya Allen Cc: Becky McKay Subject: RE:Aegean Estates No.2-FP H-2020-0084 Staff Report for Aug. 25th Date: Tuesday,August 18,2020 12:59:06 PM Attachments: irnaae006.png External Sender - Please use caution with links or attachments. Sonya: We have reviewed the conditions of approval and are in agreement. Thank you! From: Sonya Allen <sallen@meridiancity.org> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 3:52 PM To:Adrienne Weatherly<aeatherly@meridiancity.org>; Charlene Way<cway@meridiancity.org>; Chris Johnson <cjohnson@meridiancity.org> Cc: Shari Stiles<Sharis@engsol.org>; Becky McKay<Beckym@engsol.org>; Bill Parsons <bparsons@meridiancity.org> Subject:Aegean Estates No. 2 - FP H-2020-0084 Staff Report for Aug. 25th Attached is the staff report for the proposed final plat for Aegean Estates#2.This item is scheduled to be on the City Council consent agenda on August 25th. The meeting will be held at City Hall, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, beginning at 6:00 pm. Please call or e-mail with any questions. Shari/Becky— If you are not in agreement with the provisions in the staff report, submit a written response to the staff report to the City Clerk's office (cityclerk(@meridiancity.org) and me by 5:00 pm the Tuesday prior to the meeting and the item will be placed on the regular agenda. If received after that time,the application will be placed on the regular agenda on the next available Council meeting. Thanks, Sonya Allen I Associate Planner City of Meridian I Community Development Dept. 33 E. Broadway Ave., Ste. 102, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-884-5533 1 Fax: 208-489-0578 C4fE I 11_1 Built for Business, Designed for Living 0®©0 0 All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in regards to both release and retention,and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law. 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Order for Brundage Estates (TECC-2020-0001) by LC Development, Generally Located East of S. Linder Rd. Between W.Victory Rd. and W.Amity Rd. Page 158 Item#14. BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: AUGUST 25, 2020 ORDER APPROVAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) REQUEST FOR A TWO (2)YEAR ) TIME EXTENSION ON THE ) CASE NO. TECC-2020-0001 PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ) BRUNDAGE ESTATES ) ORDER OF CONDITIONAL SUBDIVISION IN ORDER TO ) APPROVAL OF TIME EXTENSION OBTAIN THE CITY ENGINEER'S ) SIGNATURE ON A FINAL PLAT, ) LOCATED IN SECTION 25, T.3N., ) R.1W, MERIDIAN,IDAHO ) BY: CODY STOEGER,L2 ) CONSTRUCTION, INC. ) APPLICANT This matter coming on regularly before the City Council on August 25, 2020,upon the Applicant's submittal of a preliminary plat time extension application for a two (2) year extension within which to obtain the City Engineer's signature on a final plat for Brundage Estates Subdivision, which preliminary plat was originally approved on July 26, 2016, as provided in Unified Development Code § 11-6B-7C, and good cause shown. An administrative time extension(A-2018-0231) for two (2) years was previously approved for this subdivision by the Planning Director on July 16, 2018 and would have otherwise expired on July 26, 2018. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The above named Applicant is granted an additional two (2) year extended period of ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF TIME EXTENSION FOR BRUNDAGE ESTATES SUBDIVISION(TECC-2020-0001) Page 1 of 2 time, until July 26, 2022, within which to obtain the City Engineer's signature on a final plat, subject to the Staff Report for the hearing date of August 25, 2020 incorporated by reference as Exhibit A. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of August 25, 2020 By the action of the City Council at its regular meeting on the 8th day of September 2020. DATED this 8th day of September , 2020 Mayor ROBERT E. SIMISON Attest: Chris Johnson, City Clerk Copy served upon the Applicant,Planning Division,Public Works Department,and City Attorney. BY: Dated: 9-8-2020 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF TIME EXTENSION FOR BRUNDAGE ESTATES SUBDIVISION(TECC-2020-0001) Page 2 of 2 Page 160 Item#14. EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT �� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT H HEARING 8/25/2020 Legend DATE: (�- j � TO: Mayor&City Council Ilf..+1 Project Uacflian FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner R RUTR- 208-884-5533 R'8 R T� SUBJECT: TECC-2020-0001 .g, Brundage Estates R-40 LOCATION: East of S. Linder Rd. between W. 71-8 R-1 S Victory Rd. &W. Amity Rd., in the west RUT '/z of Section 25,T.3N.,R.1W. R1 RUT R- L I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Request for a 2-year time extension on the preliminary plat in order to obtain the City Engineer's signature on a final plat. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 136.63 Existing/Proposed Zoning R-4 Future Land Use Designation Low Density Residential(LDR)64+/-acres&Medium Density Residential(MDR)73+/-acres Existing Land Use(s) Rural residential/agricultural Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family residential Lots(#and type;bldg./common) 366 buildable lots,20 common lots and 1 other lot Phasing Plan(#of phases) 11 Number of Residential Units(type 366 single-family detached of units) Density(gross&net) 2.68 units/acre(gross)/3.5 units/acre(net) Open Space(acres,total 20.48 acres(or 14.99%)consisting of an 8.24 acre City [%]/buffer/qualified) neighborhood park,2 pocket parks,a linear open space area where the William's Pipeline is located, 'h the street buffer along Linder Rd.,street buffers along collector streets and parkways along internal streets. Page 1 Page 161 Item#14. Description Details I Page Amenities Tot lot with children's play structure and a park bench,a multi-use pathway within the William's pipeline easement and along the Calkins Lateral,micro-paths and a gazebo. Physical Features(waterways, The Williams Northwest Gas Pipeline crosses this site& hazards,flood plain,hillside) lies within a 75'wide easement;the Calkins Lateral runs along the southwest corner of the site&the Sundall Lateral runs along the northeast corner of the site;another small irrigation ditch also crosses the site. Neighborhood meeting date;#of July 16,2020(Zoom)—No one RSVP'd for the Zoom attendees: meeting but the Applicant did speak via phone to 4 people. History(previous approvals) AZ-13-014(Ord. 14-1594)Victory South; H-2016- 0001 (PP); A-2018-0231 (TED)A Development Agreement is required to be executed prior to submittal of the first final plat application; the specific provisions of the DA are included in the Findings for the preliminary plat. B. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend a Legend PP6jec#LccaTiar identi l �#Laoa£ors J I Residential . 1eawm Density Resid tial ti mu III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Cody Stoeger,L2 Construction,Inc.—PO Box 1669,Meridian,ID 83680 B. Owner: Centers Farm,LLC PO Box 518, Meridian,ID 83680 Page 2 Page 162 Item#14. C. Representative: Same as Applicant IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Notification published in newspaper 8/7/2020 Notification mailed to property owners within 300 feet 8/4/2020 Applicant posted public hearing notice on site 8/13/2020 Nextdoor posting 8/4/2020 V. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ANALYSIS UD Per UDC 11-613-7C, "Upon written request and filing by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with subsections A and B of this section, the director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two (2)years. Additional time extensions up to two (2)years as determined and approved by the city council may be granted. With all extensions, the director or city council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of this title." The preliminary plat for this project was approved by City Council on July 26, 2016 and was valid for 2 years.Prior to the expiration date, an administrative time extension(A-2018-0231)was requested and approved by the Director on July 16,2018,which granted an additional 2 year period of time until July 26, 2020 in order to obtain the City Engineer's signature on a final plat. The reason for the previous time extension was due to incomplete sewer and water line extensions as well as upcoming improvements to Harris Street.No new conditions were placed on the application with the time extension. Prior to expiration of the previous time extension,the Applicant submitted a request for a subsequent time extension. The reason for the request per the Applicant's narrative, is that the Developer has been focusing on development of the adjacent Biltmore Estates(Oakwood) and Graycliff Estates. Since the preliminary plat and previous time extension were approved,there have not been any code changes that would necessitate new conditions being placed on the subject time extension. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the Applicant's request without any new conditions; the Applicant is still required to comply with all previous conditions of approval for this project. Approval of the subject time extension will allow the Applicant to obtain the City Engineer's signature on a final plat and proceed with development of the property. If City Council does not approve the requested time extension,the preliminary plat will expire and a new preliminary plat application will be required. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed time extension for a time period of 2 years as requested to expire on July 26, 2022. Page 3 Page 163 Item#14. B. The Meridian City Council heard these items on August 55.2020. At the public hearing.the Council moved to approve the subject TECC request, 1, Summary of the City Council public hearing a. In favor: Cody Stoe er,L2 Development b. In opposition:None c. Commenting:None d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Council inquired if water&sewer lines have been extended to the site and if improvements have been made to Harris St. (the reasons for the 1st extension)—the answer is yes 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. None VII. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(date: 1/6/2016) _ _ir �-:�� y k..f.• F i I fir' 4�k 1IL =* r � 'F.. .r.} :• 9 fix.;�, � " _-�- '4 _•_--i-----------------L�--- -- ---*-- '�-------i - . .._ li LPRl Page 4 Page 164 Item#14. �` - -- --��----------------# 41 Page 5 Page 165 Item#15. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Paramount Point (H-2020-0082) by Brighton Development, Inc., Located at 6357 N. Fox Run Way Page 166 Item#15. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI DIAN^' AND DECISION&ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Paramount Point Short Plat,by Brighton Development. Case No(s).H-2020-0082 For the City Council Hearing Date of. August 25,2020 (Findings on September 8,2020) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 25,2020,incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 25, 2020, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 25, 2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 25, 2020, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law I. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title I I Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § I I-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 25,2020, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Paramount Point Short Plat—H-2020-0082) - I - Page 167 Item#15. reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Short Plat is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of August 25,2020, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I- 6B-7C). Notice of Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit,when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time,the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting,the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two(2)year period. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-5B-6.G.1,the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one(1)two (2)year period. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title I I(UDC 11-513-6F). FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Paramount Point Short Plat—H-2020-0082) -2- Page 168 Item#15. Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521,any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52,Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of August 25,2020 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Paramount Point Short Plat—H-2020-0082) -3- Page 169 Item#15. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 8th day of September 2020. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED YEA COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED YEA COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED ------ COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED YEA COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED YEA YEA COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 9-8-2022 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Paramount Point Short Plat—H-2020-0082) -4- Page 170 Item#15. Exhibit A STAFF REPORT C: E IDIAN -•- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 08/25/2020 Legend DATE: 0 I�l U Project Location TO: Mayor&City Council IC-3 FROM: Joseph Dodson,Associate Planner C_G C C Q C-,C� 15 CI-G 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: H-2020-0082 R=4 ®® Paramount Point Short Plat m L-O RUT LOCATION: 6357 N. Fox Run Way, in the NW 1/4 of the NE /4 of Section 25,Township 4N., RUT —— Range 1 W. I� R-4 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Request to short plat 4 commercial building lots and 2 common lots on 3.88 acres of land in the C-C zoning district,by Brighton Development. IL APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Kody Daffer, Brighton Development—2929 W.Navigator Drive,Meridian,ID 83642 B. Owner: DWT Investments,LLC—2929 W.Navigator Drive,Meridian,ID 83642 C. Representative: Same as Applicant III. NOTICING City Council Posting Date Legal notice published in newspaper 8/7/2020 Radius notice mailed to property owners within 300 feet 8/4/2020 Pagel Page 171 Item#15. Exhibit A Posted to Next Door 8/4/2020 IV. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed short plat will create four(4) separate building lots and two(2)common lots for ownership purposes. The northern common lot is being created along Chinden Boulevard for the purpose of dedicating additional right-of-way to Idaho Transportation Department(ITD); the other is a common lot being used as a buffer lot to the existing residential properties abutting the subject site to the south. In addition,there are existing sidewalks and landscaping along both Chinden and N. Fox Run Way adjacent to the subject site. The subject site obtained CZC and DES approval for an urgent care facility in 2019 and that building is proposed in the northwest corner of the site(A-2019-0365), on proposed Lot 2,Block 1. In addition, an additional CZC and DES were approved in 2020 for a new bank building located in the northeast corner of the site(A-2020-0078). The bank property is no longer a part of this property because a Property Boundary Adjustment(PBA)was completed to move existing property lines and place the bank on its own property. That PBA was approved in 2019 under A-2019-0364 in conjunction with the urgent care facility application and was recently filed with the county assessor. Compliance with the design standards,parking and landscaping were reviewed and approved with those applications. Future commercial building sites will be reviewed through the CZC and DES application process for code compliance and this includes cross-access for those proposed parcels that do not have street frontage. The short plat does depict future easements for this and said instrument numbers should be on the plat prior to obtaining City Engineer signature. Submitted plans show that access to this site is proposed via driveway connections (see Exhibit VII.A); one connection is proposed to N. Fox Run Way to the east and the other driveway connection is shown near the south end of the site and connects to W. Plaza Shops Drive, a future east-west road that bisects this property as part of the Linder Village project from the west. This future road is already approved and the right-of-way is in the process of being dedicated outside of this process in conjunction with the Linder Village project approvals—the road dedications are currently in escrow according to the Applicant. Staff is recommending a condition of approval to ensure the road dedication is executed prior to receiving signature on this plat. ACHD has approved of the proposed driveway locations and the road dedication currently in process. The submitted landscape plans show adequate parking lot landscaping in compliance with UDC requirements. However,the landscape plans do not depict the landscape buffers to Chinden,Fox Run Way, or the future Plaza Shops Drive. This should be corrected prior to receiving City Engineer signature. Staff has reviewed the proposed short plat for substantial compliance with the criteria set forth in UDC 11-613-5A.2 and deems the short plat to be in substantial compliance with said requirements. V. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed short plat with the conditions noted in Section VII of this report and in accord with the findings in Section VIII. B. The Meridian City Council heard these items on August 25,2020. At the public hearing.the Council moved to approve the subject Short Plat request. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Jon Wardle,Brighton Development b. In opposition:None Page 2 Page 172 Item#15. Exhibit A C. Commenting: Jon Wardle d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Joseph Dodson f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Existing and proposed landscaping in relation to new east-west street that will bisect sub'eci t site. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation. a. None VIA EXHIBITS A. Short Plat(date: January 2020) (w I OF "PARAMOUNT POINT CHI u 1 cr H CHINLLEN NISS pI145"1rv^lG) E. r t p SUBDIVISION P S e. _____ _____ A PORTION OF THE N.W.1/4 OF THE N.E.1l4,SECTION 25, LOT 1-a 22 ti RES TOIWSHIP 4 NORTH,RANGE 1 WEST,B.M.,CITY OF LTarmm: MERIDIAN,ADA COLNTY,IDAHO • 1465A' � F SECTIONAL CORNER 2020 r____ -______ I •_ _ ea9arrnF3r� rmn 1145ECTIONAL CORNER - T - ---------� m SET ZIB"RE3AR&PLASHC CRP PL55�W •� REaaRPL67eeo 1 lYl EOUND I2 RERAR P.L.E.190 UNLESS DTHERWISE NDTED \„ _ B OCK 1 POUND F.RER CAP LOT EI 6ET 112'FE 9A WITH ft WITH PLASTIC GAP MARKED 9B6 H 0.54 ACRES ESMTPLS0 G FOUND M'REBRR WITH ILLEGIBLE GAPFUR /JV� ■ FOUND 51d"REBAR WITH ILLEGIBLE CAP I �'o / I • PO.C. PC CEM INTCFCCMMENENT 4 P} ` `}7I NOT PART I P.u.I.D- Puauc uTlurr.IreRlcanaNwv❑DRwNnt;E EASEMENT I I 29.50' 29.56' UTIONLrvE NOUNENIENIFDARY LINE LET LINE ETT UNE 4 I: ADJACENT PARCEL LINE Ill �0 �N I I C.P.BF CORNER PERPETUAIION AND FILING INSTRUMENT NUMBER (3) ADJACENTLOTNUMHER LIr„ Iv I J MONUMENTHASNOCAPAND IS0.23 SOUTH OF RECORD POSITION MONUMENT HAS NOm AND ISO n'SOUTH OF RECORD POSITION e l d�xl fix Q a� �J ANTI CIPATELI FUTURE RIGHT OF— �' SEW ER MAIN EASEMENT PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT No.xrrrrnsz BLOCKI ICI t = _''J"L_'- —852°a I o Al (o�e _ --- - __ WATER MHIN EASEMENT PUR3UANT TO IN3TRUMENT Ne,xv.Wv.'u LOTS VB_er51 T ,�— � I I PUPLICUTILITY AND DRAINAGE PUREUANTTOINRTRUMENT N.rsxxrrxrx 0.71 ACRES -I �- _I_ sm __ -t�m - � I ��, I I "OO_fl_ � IDRHD POWER PERMANENT EASEMENT INSTRUMEMNo.cavcgpt L.c. NGNESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT IN5MUMEM Na.xxx.. I I' I I �ryna I 31 I I II I urre TZEYa D°e rame 129,50' 29.50' glm _ LiNau Len,»n o.recaon ones Leaeu DilM.rien 111 L2 10M NW 26'RRW L2f 34.W N89°27 IIW LOT LB 15.W NW 31'WE L22 15�(I' fi00'32'25'W 0.83 ACRES I� - 1 19 10 Ld NEB'SS 66•W L23 34W 35•E 4` 1 ICI I^w tii ` Leo ug2• Naa•n•3sw L24 1236• sag°32'Z>'•W e � I �I I _ r 111 10.ST 39532'25W 126 1B.91' S9.ri DO 00'E FRITZ RRONMELL � P.LS.>N96B jLOT 1G,W 9ao°92•asw Lz6 za sz Nss•oo'arw 0.36 ACRES '�I I P4� e6vM� 11s en• 5."M'11'E L27 MIT MQ'M14W 4='ram I y ��� Lea 1rs�• sa°n'�'E Lzs u.aa• Nag°oa ca•E I�s. g-f2� 1. -� �rA� Lis 3445 N�`D'33W L1B aunr G00"32'13"W o• iT LiT 3A63' 139"1'35"E L31 2T.9T' S1E 0230'E L16 12.gP NW 2]'3SW L32 GZI' N50'23'01"E 0.700ACRES \ L1s 15W 6BB•3z'SR* az ` I ___ ' eLOcicz � Leo 1zm se9°n'39'E Les 2sae' W2'1a3o^E y�� 3+Oy'e'e srz"----- F. ICCMMON) F FEET R CFI �] 21A W.Nevigatrir Or. LTO7"�71OCVG� Surayed by D-MCGeMyIn _ � 5ui1a 210 11 1\i\L� 1�11F7 eLCA'� ', 05— _ _ (206)895I25M64 —In— Jenuery CflDM� alAG 31 D e 6 m--- 1 E N G I N E E R S —P jZulD-zlsTzgol Page 3 Page 173 Item#15. Exhibit A B. Site Plan(approved with Paramount Urgent Care application) — — I a I� I I I• ^b. - - l i I I o '��i t I ➢� �k - I I y�� QF f � AI - I� J a -A I I � I � i i ���' _✓� �€ �n MERIDIAN,IDAHOI� CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS a (R PARAMOUNT URGENT CARE O � r Page 4 Page 174 Item#15. Exhibit A C. Landscape Plan d V Z ::u BAERI PLANT SCHEDULE Rom. — .gym Aro 15 ,I�,-E Rr ~ CL A � ui I corrcn w.c p LI/OSCME AUTE%�LS pEYE1OPER WDSCI{E IRCNIiECT CL '93i �Q IX•vi,., �e�"w°ii.,¢°f-Irw� uu�et m.eu u,�°h z C •� � L �LI- rgw rxcxE n �e,—pox xe-iaN,sa� f0 rFE �L'µi., �oEf � LRRCiSCIPE LEREIi] cc� C � 7 a •'-�d.�.—� L.lJLBCAfE RE0UR9B11B � t $HpR7 PLA7 LANDSCAPE PLAN °o ed.r-saa L1.0 Page 5 Page 175 AM • .. AOO IBM OR . . ,� Own or Mouwmm Hm dr 1Flo �:. II = . , - Item#15. Exhibit A VII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development(AZ-13-005; PP-13-008; Development Agreement Inst. #103137116 113083665,2016-005060,2017-003462 and H-2017-066043). 2. Prior to the receiving City Engineer's signature on this short plat,the Applicant shall obtain a Development Agreement Modification approval in order to be in compliance with the previous development agreements and subsequent modifications on this site. 3. Prior to the receiving City Engineer's signature on this short plat,the Applicant shall provide proof to the Planning Department that the right-of-way for W. Plaza Shops Drive has been dedicated to ACHD. 4. If the City Engineer's signature has not been obtained within two(2)years of the City Council's approval of the short plat,the short plat shall become null and void unless a time extension is obtained,per UDC 11-6B-7. 5. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature, obtain the signatures of the Ada County Highway District and the Central District Health Department. 6. The short plat prepared by Horrocks Engineers prepared on January 2020 by Fritz Brownell, included in Section VII.A shall be revised as follows: a. Include recorded sewer instrument number. b. Include recorded water main instrument number. c. Include recorded public utility and drainage instrument number. d. Include recorded Idaho Power instrument number. e. Include recorded ingress and egress instrument number. f. Include recorded ACHD instrument number for W. Plaza Shops Drive. 7. The landscape plan prepared by Baer Design Group, dated May 19, 2020, included in Section VII.0 shall be revised prior to receiving City Engineer signature on the plat as follows: a. Depict the required landscape buffers along Chinden Boulevard(SH 20/26), N. Fox Run Way(a collector street),and future W. Plaza Shops Dr. b. Show the existing landscaping within the street buffers to Chinden Boulevard and N. Fox Run Way. c. Show the required landscaping along future W. Plaza Shops Drive within the required landscape buffer on Lots 4 and 5,Block 1, and on Lot 1, Block 2 in accord with UDC 11- 3B-7C. d. Depict the location of the required 10-foot multi-use pathway along Chinden(SH 20/26). 8. Prior to submittal for City Engineer signature,the applicant shall submit a public access easement for the multi-use pathway along Chinden Boulevard(SH 20/26). Submit easements to the Planning Division for Council approval and subsequent recordation. The easements shall be a minimum of 14' wide(10' pathway+2' shoulder each side).Use standard City template for public access easement. Easement checklist must accompany all easement submittals. Coordinate with Kim Warren from the City of Meridian Parks Department. Page 7 Page 177 Item#15. Exhibit A 9. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the previous approvals noted above does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions: 1. The width of sanitary sewer and water mainline easements shall be provided consistent with those detailed in General Condition#20 below without overlapping. General Conditions: 2. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision;applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department,and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 3. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 4. All improvements related to public life,safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 5. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff,the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-313-14A. 6. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City.The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 9. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life,non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 10. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction Page 8 Page 178 Item#15. Exhibit A inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 12. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 13. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 14. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-14B. 15. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 16. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 17. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 18. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 19. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 20. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2" x I I" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 21. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 22. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non- Page 9 Page 179 Item#15. Exhibit A domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 23. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 24. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 9-1-28.C.1).The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available,a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 25. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. VIII. REQUIRED FINDINGS FROM THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE In consideration of a short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: A. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the Unified Development Code; The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use of this property as Mixed Use Community and the current zoning district of the site is C-C. Council finds the proposed short plat complies with the Comprehensive Plan and is being developed in accord with UDC standards for the existing zoning district. B. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; Council finds that public services will be provided to this property and are adequate to serve the future commercial building sites. C. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvements program; Council finds that the development will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. All required utilities were provided with the development of the property at the developer's expense. D. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; Council finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing supporting services as services are already being provided to the immediate area. E. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and Council finds the proposed short plat to create new commercial building lots will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. F. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. Council is not aware of any significant natural,scenic or historic features associated with short platting this site. Page 10 - Page 180 Item#16. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Revised Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Brody Square (H-2020- 0032) by Pinnacle Land Development, LLC, Located on the Northeast and Southeast Corners of N. Black Cat Rd. and W. Daphne St. Page 181 Item#16. CITY OF MERIDIAN REVISED FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI DIAN AND DECISION& ORDER A In the Matter of the Request for Annexation and Zoning of 15 Acres of Land with a R-8 zoning District,and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 64 Building Lots, and Vacation of Daphne Right of Way by Pinnacle Land Development,LLC. Case No(s). H-2020-0032 For the City Council Hearing Date of: July 21,2020 (Findings on August 4,2020) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 21,2020, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 21,2020, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 21, 2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 21,2020, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67, Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(BRODY SQUARE—FILE H-2020-0032) - I - Page 182 Item#16. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 21,2020, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for annexation,zoning,preliminary plat and vacation of Daphne Street is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of July 21, 2020,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I- 6B-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-651 IA. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(BRODY SQUARE—FILE H-2020-0032) -2- Page 183 Item#16. agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28)days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52,Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of July 21,2020 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(BRODY SQUARE—FILE H-2020-0032) -3- Page 184 Item#16. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 8th day of September 2020. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTEDYEA COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED YEA COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED ----- COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED YEA COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED YEA COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED YEA MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED ------ (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 9-8-2020 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(BRODY SQUARE—FILE H-2020-0032) -4- E X H I BIT A STAFF REPORT E IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING 7/21/2020 ' Legend DATE: TO: Mayor&City Council f PFnjeat Lorcator b FROM: Alan Tiefenbach,Associate Planner 208-489-0573 Bruce Freckleton,Development ----- Services Manager -' 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2020-0032 Brody Square i LOCATION: The site is located within the northeast quadrant of N. Black Cat Road and W. _ McMillan Road., in the SW 1/4 of Section 27,Township 4 N.,Range 1 W. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Annexation&zoning of 15 acres of land(3 different properties)with an R-8 zoning district, and preliminary plat consisting of 65 building lots and 7 common lots,by Pinnacle Land Development, LLC. This request also includes vacating approximately 275 feet of Daphine Street. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 15.00 Future Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential Existing Land Use(s) Single Family/Rural Proposed Land Use(s) Single Family,65 Lots Lots(#and type;bldg./common) 65 Single Family,7 Common Lots Phasing Plan(#of phases) 1 phase Number of Residential Units(type 65 Single Family of units) Density 4.33 du/acre Open Space(acres,total 2.67 acres, 16.5%total open space, 11.5%qualified open [%]/buffer/qualified) space Amenities <20 acres, one required. Physical Features(waterways, Beach Lateral parallels N.Black Cat Road. hazards,flood plain,hillside) Neighborhood meeting date;#of January 23,2020—7 attendees signed in. attendees: Page 1 Page 186 Item#16. Description Details Page History(previous approvals) Black Cat Estates No. I &2,unincorporated Ada County B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Yes • Requires ACHD Commission Action(yes/no) Yes—Vacation of Daphne St must be approved by ACHD. Access(Arterial/Collectors/State Four accesses are proposed.The Hwy/Local)(Existing and Proposed) western access is to N.Black Cat Road(Minor Arterial)from Daphine Street(local road)and the eastern access is to McMillan Road(Minor Arterial)via Daphine Street and N.Joy Street (local roads).There are two stub streets shown. Traffic Level of Service Per the ACHD staff report: McMillan Rd.—Better than"E" (acceptable level of service) Black Cate Rd.—Better than"E" (acceptable level of service) Stub Street/Interconnectivity/Cross Access The applicant is proposing two stub streets—one to the east and one to the south. Existing Road Network Minor Arterials and Local Streets Existing Arterial Sidewalks/Buffers Buffer and sidewalk exists on west side of N.Black Cat Road (part of the Jump Creek Subdivision.)Buffer and sidewalk on east side of N.Black Cat Road proposed with this subdivision. Proposed Road Improvements Local streets are being constructed to serve this development.All streets will be constructed to ACHD standards. Distance to nearest City Park(+size) Approx. 1.5 miles to Keith Bird Legacy Park and Heroes Park Distance to other key services Approx. 1.5 miles to Hunter Elementary School,2 miles to Rocky Mountain High School. Fire Service • Distance to Fire Station Fire Station No.2,2.6 miles • Fire Response Time Less than 5 minutes • Resource Reliability 76%-does meet the targeted goal of 80%or greater • Risk Identification Risk Factor 2. Current resources would not be adequate to supply serve to project. • Accessibility Project meets all required access, road widths and turnaround. Page 2 Page 187 Item#16. Description Details Page • Special/resource needs Project will not require an aerial device;cannot meet this need in the required timeframe if a truck company is required. Closest truck company is 13 minutes travel time. • Water Supply Requires 1,000 gallons per minute for one hour,may be less if buildings are fully s rinklered. Police Service No comments submitted. West Ada School District No comments submitted. Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Services Directly adjacent in N.Black Cat Road • Sewer Shed North Black Cat Trunkshed • Estimated Project Sewer ERU's See application • WRRF Declining Balance 13.91 • Project Consistent with WW Master Yes Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts/Concerns •No sewer mains in common driveways. •No manholes in common driveways or sidewalks. •Provide"to and through" sewer connection to the property to the south. Water • Distance to Water Services Located in N.Black Cat Road • Pressure Zone 1 • Estimated Project Water ERU's See application • Water Quality No concerns • Project Consistent with Water Master Plan Yes • Impacts/Concerns Modeling analysis will need to be completed at Final Plat to verify minimum fire flow pressure is met at each phase. Page 3 Page 188 1 1 1 ���?illnlll�:. 111�::- ;1 _•_ �,... `, 1----'� ' '� �. �9P9Y�r �uu IIIII IIIH�'inl a t I-.� 5 -iral 1 I■11■11 IN1N1 INII �_- _11s.■+'.r � '1 IL INII IIN1111. ■ 1N1NNa1N - a`• 513L••2 roramm join ON ILIILI-�1 1N1N1HN INII71- . .4-__-___■ a u l' l■1 in mill I ■1 in 71N 1 ' iiiii - 1 11 1w 11 ■u111 w 1Lti, 1 1 N No- -T.,. ..,1 Cra. 111111Y1u IIINIIIpl�1 IIIIN 111N� - - Irl -- F.1 L•F+1 ILL#N 1 INII!! IIIINII II uu � - 171N11 I111� III I• f.. . - � I _ •'� �. 1 IIJ11 1 _�1111111111 NIIY - .. - LIL l'11H - 17 - 1 MINI' — z= o i 1■ milli in -_?NUNu1mm• 1 I�::- 1 _-=?Nunw_:• 1 11�in I - 1 1 -- _ME �uu IIIII uRN--inl 1 IIIII IIIII III" inl I■11■11 11111 1N11 I■11■11 IN1N1 mill I IIN1111- ■ 1N1NNa1N INIINI- ■ 1N1NNa1m = Z 111111-�1 1N1N1HN Z 111111-�1 mill1HN N1■r rlll ■N1N 1N1 - YIY• rlll mill III u IN MEN 1 11L mill .-1--�•- 1■1-:= a 111 1 1+1.1 i Iglu INN -- iiiii - 1 11 1N IIIIi1N -- iiiii --.(, 11 11 1N1■m .IIIII 111 IH 1 NMmiN - 1 N lIHI■cull ■NIIII ■1N N IIIINII 111 =-11 IIIIYII ■NIIII ,111111111 1111111 ■ ■1N N _ �- mtiiwnuu 11 1 1q1 N11111N11 - I���IxI� III IIIII- � y 111 11 � � z- u�- IIIII -- 1 11 111�I 1 111111N1 ' ' iii 1�� 11�11 11111111 IIIIIIIII f � PH - -� ' -IIIII NIIII 1111111111 11111.i. � 11111111- - -� ' -11111 ' -111 1 II IIII 1 IIIIIII II i■IIIII • HE Hill llll I llnlllll IIIII;=1=IIINIIIGl�• IIIIN 112N� IIIII;=1=IIINIIIGl�• IIIIN 112N� —1III111 �i^ti iflllw 1 INII! IIIINII II u11 1 INII! IIIINII II u11 Illlluu 1 71N 11 1111� III I• 1 71H 11 1111� III I• �IIINIIR : 1 1 _�1111111111 NIIY : 1 IIJ111 _�1111111111 NIIY 111111 111 111 l'11H _�IINIIINI Illlli RET"m 117111 1 1 111 =m L7■ u...—- H+ 1s1- L7+ L7■1 . 11111� IIIIIIIII =11111��1 1��111 1 1 , ■ , Item#16. 4924 &5120 N. Black Cat Rd, 4644 W. Daphine Street,Meridian, ID 83646 C. Representative: Keith Nichter,Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc, 950 W. Bannock St,Boise,ID 83702 IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper Notification 5/29/2020 6/19/2020 Radius notification mailed to properties within 300 feet 5/29/2020 7/16/2020 Public hearing notice sign posted 7/10/2020 on site Nextdoor posting 5/27/2020 7/16/2020 V. STAFF ANALYSIS A. Annexation: The proposed annexation area is contiguous to City annexed property and is within the Area of City Impact Boundary. To ensure the site develops as proposed by the applicant, staff is recommending a development agreement as part of the annexation approval. B. Future Land Use Map Designation(https://www.meridiancity.or /�compplan) This property is designated Medium Density Residential on the City's Future Land Use Map (FLUM) contained in the Comprehensive Plan. This designation allows for dwelling units at gross densities of three to eight dwelling units per acre. Density bonuses may be considered with the provision of additional public amenities such as a park, school, or land dedicated for public services. The annexation area is near existing public services and not on the periphery of corporate city limits; existing City of Meridian zoning and development is directly adjacent to the west, north and nearby to the east. The proposed land use of single family residential is consistent with the recommended uses in the FL UM designation. The proposed project has a gross density of 4.3 du/ac, meeting the required density range listed above. Therefore, Staff finds the proposed preliminary plat and requested R-8 zoning district to be generally consistent with the Future Land Use Map designation of Medium Density Residential. The City may require a development agreement (DA) in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. In order to ensure the site develops as proposed with this application, staff recommends a DA as a provision of annexation with the provisions included in Section IX.A. The DA is required to be signed by the property owner(s)/developer and returned to the City within 6 months of the Council granting the annexation for approval by City Council and subsequent recordation. Comprehensive Plan Policies (https:llwww.meridiancitE.or /�pplan): Page 5 Page 190 Item#16. The following Comprehensive Plan Policies are applicable to this development: • "Encourage a variety of housing types that meet the needs,preferences, and financial capabilities of Meridian's present and future residents." (2.01.02D) The proposed medium density single-family detached homes will contribute to the variety of residential categories in the City; however, there is no variety in housing types proposed within the development. The FL UM recommends densities of between 3 and 8 dwelling units per acre. Given this density recommendation, likely any resulting housing would be of the single-family detached type. • "With new subdivision plats, require the design and construction of pathway connections, easy pedestrian and bicycle access to parks, safe routes to schools, and the incorporation of usable open space with quality amenities." (2.02.01A) The proposed plat depicts S'sidewalks on both sides of all local roads, a S'detached sidewalk along Black Cat Rd, and 6'wide pathways within the central common open space. This will result in multi-modal routes both to the development and within the development. The central park amenity shown in Lot 9 consists of a small pond, a gazebo and several pathways. At present, the pond cuts off walkway access in the middle of Block 3. It is staff's opinion that connecting the two pathways along the pond would result in more useable space. Staff has added this as a recommended condition of approval. • "Require pedestrian access in all new development to link subdivisions together and promote neighborhood connectivity." (2.02.01D) Attached sidewalks are proposed on both side of all streets. Sidewalks will be completed to the terminus of stub streets at the east and south which would connect to any future development. A S'detached sidewalk is proposed along the length of the development paralleling Black Cat Road. • "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and urban services at the time of final approval, and in accord with any adopted levels of service for public facilities and services." (3.03.03F) City water and sewer service is available along Black Cat Road and can be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. • Ensure that new development within existing residential neighborhoods is cohesive and complementary in design and construction. (2.02.02F) To the west of the subject property is the Jump Creek Subdivision, zoned R-8 (same as this proposal) with lot sizes of approximately 6,000 square feet (similar sizes as what is proposed with this plat). North of the property is single family residential zoned R- 4. South of the property is vacant land, and east of the property is rural residential zoned RUT in Ada County. The areas that have developed in the vicinity of the subject property thus far have been comparable in zoning and lot sizes. Page 6 Page 191 Item#16. This development proposes architecture consisting of one and two story homes with pitched roofs, stone bases and/or lap siding very similar to what has been constructed in the Jump Creek Subdivision. The landscape buffer and S'detached pathway shown on the landscape plan is comparable to the improved stretch of Black Cat Road along the Jump Street Subdivision. The proposed single-family residential development and site design should be compatible with existing residential uses. In order to ensure compatibility and quality of design, staff recommends a condition that the rear and/or sides of 2-story structures on Lots 11-21, Block I and Lots 2-6, Block 2 that face N. Black Cat Road shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation (e.g.projections, recesses, step-backs, pop-outs), bays, banding,porches, balconies, material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines. Single- story structures are exempt from this requirement. Planning approval will be required at time of building permit. C. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: The subject property consists of three lots. There is an existing single-family residence on each lot. These will be removed. D. Proposed Use Analysis: Single-family detached dwellings are listed as a principal permitted use in the R-8 zoning districts in UDC Table 11-2A-2. E. Dimensional Standards(UDC 11-2): All proposed lots and public streets appear to meet UDC dimensional standards per the submitted preliminary plat. This includes property sizes, required street frontages, and road widths. Development of the subdivision is required to comply with the subdivision design and improvement standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3, including but not limited to streets, common driveways and block face. In addition, all subdivision developments are also required to comply with Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards (UDC I I- 6C-3)regarding common driveways. There are two (2) common driveways proposed; such driveways should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. An exhibit should be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks,fencing, building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via the common driveway. If a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street, the driveway should be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway. A perpetual ingress/egress easement shall be filed with the Ada County Recorder, which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. Page 7 Page 192 Item#16. Address signage should be provided at the public street for homes accessed via the common driveways. F. Access(11-3A-3): Four accesses are proposed. The western access is to N. Black Cat Road (Minor Arterial) from Daphine Street(local road) and the eastern access is to McMillan Road(Minor Arterial)via Daphine Street and N. Joy Street(local roads). There are two stub streets shown. ACHD reviewed this proposal and in a staff report dated May 1, 2020 stated the project is anticipated to generate approximately 613 additional trips per day, with 65 additional trips during the PM peak hour. Black Cat Road, a minor arterial, is presently improved with two travel lanes. ACHD intends to expand it to three lanes between 2026 and 2030. There is no curb, gutter or sidewalk on the east side along the subject property although it is improved with detached sidewalk on the west. Existing right-of-way is approximately 29 feet from centerline to the subject property. The applicant proposes to dedicate 19 additional feet of right-of-way to centerline and construct a 5'detached sidewalk in this area. Daphne Street is presently built to 26 feet wide in a 50'right-of-way without curb, gutter or sidewalk. The applicant proposes to vacate approximately 275 feet of Daphne at the center of the proposed development to locate an approximately 1.6 acre park and pond in this area. At the east and west of this park, Daphne will be built to 33 feet in width with rolled curb, gutter and 5 foot attached sidewalk. ACHD has not expressed concerns regarding the proposed vacation. City Council is a recommending body on the vacation request. Two stub streets are proposed. Avilla Drive will stub to the east, and Eynsford Ave will stub to the south. All roads within this proposed development will be local roads built to the same standards as Daphne Street. During the November 7, 2019 Pre-Application Meeting, staff recommended that a stub street should be provided to the north from Avilla Drive through Block 1. This is to allow future access from the property at 5230 N. Black Cat Rd if it were to redevelop in the future. This access is not provided. Staff is recommending this as a condition of approval. W. McMillan Road, a minor arterial, is intended to be widened from two to three lanes by 2035. A roundabout is planned for the McMillan/Black Cat intersection. W. McMillan Road is not part of this development. Meridian Fire has stated the project meets all required access, road widths and turnarounds. ACHD has stated they support the road network and improvements as proposed. G. Parking(UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family detached dwellings based on the number of bedrooms Page 8 Page 193 Item#16. per unit. Future development should comply with these standards. No parking plan was submitted with the application. H. Pathways (UDC 11-3A-8): Several pathways are proposed with this development. At the center of the development is a common lot containing a park and a pond(Lot 9 Block 3). There is an approximately 295'long pathway north of the pond in this common lot. There is an east/west pathway south of the pond. Sidewalks are proposed on both sides of all roads within the development. The applicant is requesting an open water pond be credited toward their qualifying open space (as is discussed below). For full credit, staff recommends the northern and southern pathways connect along the pond to produce a more inviting and useable area. The applicant has submitted conceptual exhibits to demonstrate the alignment and distances. All pathways will be required to meet the requirements of section 11-3A-8 of the UDC. I. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-17): Attached sidewalks are proposed along internal streets in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. J. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-1 No parkways are proposed with this plat. K. Landscaping(UDC I1-3B): The development proposes approximately 108,000 sf of open space, which is 16.5%of the total area. This includes a 25'wide buffer along Black Cat Road as required for arterial streets, 20'wide landscape strips on either side of Daphne Street, and a central open space and park with a water feature shown as Lot 9. With a length of 988 feet, 28 trees would be required within the Black Cat Road Buffer. The landscape plan proposes 34 trees. The buffer appears to comply with UDC 11-2A-6. L. Qualified Open Space (UDC 11-3G): The applicant proposes 11.5%of qualified open space. This includes a central park within Lot 9, Block 3 (including a .42-acre pond) and the.54-acre arterial landscape buffer which is being given % credit per the UDC. The pond is 24%of the total qualified open space, which meets the 25%maximum of UDC 11-3G-3D. As is required to count the pond as qualified open space, it is proposed to be developed with an amenity consisting of a shade structure and several benches. The landscaping as proposed meets the minimum requirements of 11-3B. As mentioned in the "Pathways"Section above, staff recommends the northern and southern pathways connect along the pond to produce a more inviting and useable area. M. Qualified Site Amenities (UDC 11-3G): Based on the area of the proposed plat(15.4 acres), a minimum of one (1) qualified site amenity is required to be provided per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3C. Page 9 Page 194 Item#16. The applicant has proposed one (1) qualified amenity, a pond and shade structure with a seat wall and several benches. There are pathways that intersect in this area. The amenity meets the minimum requirements of UDC 11-3G. N. Tree preservation(11-3B-10) The applicant proposes to remove 93 trees (1,367 cal. inches) that will require mitigation. The applicant has committed to working with the City Arborist prior to removal. Staff is recommending a condition that the applicant submit a tree mitigation plan at time of final plat. This mitigation plan shall indicate the total number and caliper inches of trees proposed for removal and the total number of replacement trees proposed. O. Waterways(UDC 11-3A-6): The existing Beach Lateral parallels the western property line along Black Cat Road. This ditch is required to be piped as indicated by UDC 11-3A-6. P. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6C and 11-3A- 7. Fencing is shown on the landscape plan and consists of 6' high solid vinyl fencing around the entire perimeter of the development (including along Black Cat Road, and 5' open style lattice top fencing along the common areas. There are several areas within Lot 9 (the common area) where closed style fencing is shown. UDC 11-3A-7 requires any fencing abutting pathways and open space to be open style. Q. Utilities (UDC 11-3A-21): Public services are available to accommodate the proposed development. All lots within the subdivision will be provided domestic water and sanitary sewer service by the City via extensions available along N. Black Cat Road. Irrigation will be provided by Settlers Irrigation District via the Beach Lateral. The Beach Lateral is not a constant delivery system so a pump and pond will be constructed for water storage. The pond is being developed as a landscape feature. R. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): The Applicant has submitted sample elevations of the single-family homes for this project(see Section VIII). The single-family homes are depicted as two-story structures with two-car garages, and a variety of finish materials with stone and lap-siding combinations. The submitted sample elevations appear to meet design requirements for single-family homes and use consistent architecture as the homes across N. Black Cat Road in the Jump Creek Subdivision. As mentioned in the Comprehensive Plan section above, a condition of approval is being recommended in regard to planning review of homes visible from N. Black Cat Road. S. Right-of-Way Vacation The applicant is proposing to vacate approximately 275 feet of Daphne Street to configure the central park and open space in the center of the development. Proposed internal roads will route traffic around the park. This section of Daphne Street is not Page 10 Page 195 Item#16. needed for access. Therefore, staff is supportive of vacating the ROW. However,per City Code, the City Council is only a recommending body on the vacation request; final approval is subject to ACHD approval. ACHD has noted a separate application will be required and the vacation should be completed prior to final plat approval. If the vacation is ultimately not approved, the plat as currently presented must be revised. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation and zoning with the requirement of a Development Agreement and approval of the requested preliminary plat with the conditions noted in Section IX. per the Findings in Section X. B. The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on June 18, 2020. At the public hearing, the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject Annexation and Preliminary Plat request. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_: a. In favor: Deborah Nelson with Givens Pursley, Randy Clarno with Pinnacle Land Development and Brandon McDougald with Kimley Horn (Applicant's Representatives), Paul Poorman, neighbor at 5230 N. Black Cat Road. b. In opposition: None c. Commenting: Deborah Nelson with Givens Pursley, Randy Clarno with Pinnacle Land Development and Brandon McDougald with Kimley Horn (Applicant's Representatives) d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Alan Tiefenbach f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons 2. Ke. ids) of public testimony a. Paul Poorman, adjacent neighbor to the north at 5230 N. Black Cat Road, said the applicant had been very good with working with him, and he supported the development but had privacy concerns. He said the applicant had assured him he would get a privacy fence to the south and any houses adjacent to his would be kept one story so they would not look down into his house. 3. Key issues(s) of discussion by Commission a. The Commissioners discussed whether the northern stub street was necessary. Page 11 Page 196 Item#16. b. The Commissioners had questions regarding_ future expansions of N. Black Cat Road and whether the round-about was still being constructed at N. Black Cat Road and W. McMillian Road. c. The Commissioners discussed whether the pond should be considered an amenity, and whether it could be reconfigured to connect the north and south pathways as staff had recommended. d. The Commissioners discussed Paul Poorman's request for a fence, and his desire for adjacent homes to be kept to one story. 4. Commission change(s) to Staff recommendation: a. Remove staff condition for a stub street to be provided to the north from Avilla Drive through Block 1. b. Remove Lot 61 to reconfigure the pond into this area to provide a better open space and allow the connection of the pathways as recommended by staff. c. Add a restriction that homes on Lots 42-44 be limited to one-story. d. Add a condition for a concrete wall and berm to be constructed along the property line adjacent to 5230 N. Black Cat Road. 5. Outstanding issues(s) for City Council: a. The lot numbering on the plat versus the landscape plan is not consistent. The plat has the correct numbering. The Planning Commission recommendation for homes on Lots 42-44 to be limited to one-story should be changed to Lots 8-10, Block 1. C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on July 21, 2020. At the public hearing, the Council moved to approve the subject preliminary plat request. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing_ a. In favor: Deborah Nelson (Givens Pursley) b. In opposition: None c. Commenting: Deborah Nelson(Givens Pursley), Rand. Clarno developer, and Tim Nicholson(Kimley—Horn) d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Alan Tiefenbach f. Other Staff commenting on application: None Page 12 Page 197 Item#16. 2. Key issue(s) of public testimony a. None 3. Ke, ids) of discussion by City Council: a. None 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. None Page 13 Page 198 Item#16. VII. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(date: 7/1/2020) FQFB x.ux C IT IIT 13.�SF T xo17 L7r #P-0C�o,hx r• 13 47Y r iT Mr �rwYaiY IV M rT I al y,1 IAI rl 4Y .I =1 LY 1 61 1 11 -1 10'-I 11' 6�� ads 1i>�F {WSJ W�pM IF �� 1�d77F F �TF P ?f� 12 3M sr aui r iii' 93+' I M P i in I 1 iC �r 17 �• .F I J 1 11 — it I-W -- 10 IIr*SF I �I lit' Y I IS a I 1* e $ Io-cv[i y41 s � � a.m seoo g 14, Wa r +7 17 I I 7 nC' xI* rs�r ' I star g I4 ,a I I Y#071F I a,meg � Y I� dae W Arf! -- �I 141 I + "� — —i t „a GLOM 6 AMMININ a,w aF I h i,o' I ym r Y� iib Y I ,sm a �I� •I s 1 �I 14 q moo g I 111 q� I 6i,7 Y No OF ii �i +� an�o �M if �-- I I Iff W7 7F IIuu �- 7. riy yr I R Mac sF � t1 I �i nve -- irm "10 J-� Ny —� sire r 51 L-blJb' NF- — tx " _ I w, s ' ,moo 114 F s Y en•v �I -1R fT nC i I .r Ib 10 lµ 11 I 13 ib is IS . I SSW W � tf+ I b!n if I�rrss W I-€_ffi F L Firm r a- I � 1 05 I irm r AFN. sw -- T — 1 __ llfdl - -am �- r— 1 9 I Mv I 77 r IIIF� 2 F g I , I rl VI bl _ i I I I �I c - 7 � 71 I J! * 'II 10 �II 11 � ix -1 ib 7�9G A ' • SF+I #F7b 76,1>f ,.5,-L MR F F!� m w 11 f19}*F nu sr AIFy Tb?Z a3oAd P Y A6CW- I �o.Yvxxllfoa i rax3� n,O®7" I sr G,w.6A rF M Orr TWL xIY. e Page 199 B. Landscape Plan(date: 7/|/2020) L-LI 30 LOCK I 20 52 API 12 23 IQ 22 21 Item#16. C. Amenities Commun V Shad-e Stru cturelPic plc Area ti- Ramard3: ■ Manufacturer_ Classic Retiree Jon S y stem s b Model: Charleston f Size: 21Y x 2T b Mau--Hal: Sieel • Cdk�r 'Cool Jade Greeh" (roof) and 'Jet Black' {frame) Comniu n Pored (Exam pie 3tucco Seat Wal I t Example Page 16 Page 201 D. Elevations Page 17 5 _ 1 -�� ,• ---'--Try -.�•-1.. Z.__-=� - -'� - _ + - _ •,� ,.r ..�:: .I�� Tom` � J�� . i Item#16. E. Legal Description Descaption for Brody SquaroSubdivision-Anneia#ion A parcA51 of land sduated within the Southwest 114 of the Southwest 114 of Section 27, Township 4 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more partictilady deeGribed as follows- Commencing at the Section corner common to Sections 27. 26. 33, and 34, T 4N. R.IW. S.M. from which the 114 comer corn mon to said Sections 27 8nd 20 bears North 00`31'09"East, 2637.37 feet; thence cn the West boundary line of said Section 27. North 00°31'09" East. 329.49 feet to the REAL POINT OF f3E INNING; thence continuing on said West boundary line, North 00'3V09" East. 989.15 feet to the South 1116 corner cornrnm to said Section 27 and 2B-. thence on the North boundary line of the Southowehst I of the Southwest 114 of said Section 27. South 89°1T41" East, 66-0.80 feet to the Northwest canner of Lot 2, Block 2, Black Cat Estates No. 2, as filed in Book 32 of Plats at Pages 1945 and 1946. records of Arta County, Idaho; thence South 00'31'08" West, 989.12 feet to the SOLtheast corner of said Lot 1 Black Cat Eslates No. ?, as filed in Book 29 of Plats at Pages 1798 and 1799, records of Ada Cnuaty, Idaho thence North 89`17'52"West 660.80 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. Guntaining 15 00 acres. more of less. End of Descnption. is CC I 1177 Page 1 of 1 Page 203 Item#16. 1/4 Jv t.5 10C *p4 B z7 0 no zoo r SCALE; 1" _ 200' 1 16 T UJVPL117F TED � 589'r 7'47"E 664.90' 221 r27 I , I I UNPLA TIED I r I 1III I i aEOCX 2 z "� E3 I DLAck c4r E t} 1 ESTATES NO- 2 SUDDrvislox 00 V �' rn O rn 4 ly�I f15M kCRES W. DAPHNE ST. I I 1 I 0 I I I REAL, PDIIJT CF 9LCrCK DECINNrNG afaCx CAT aNMI7'52"'k 964.8Q - 93FATFS WO. f SUBDIVISION LA U1TPL TT�'D ' ' v 1 77 sa- s 7 W. MCMILLRN R0- F ' 33 J IDAHO EXHIBIT DRAWING FOR h MSs UR11E w 'L� BRODY SQUARE UBDI► 151ON—ANNEXATION WM6l]'}i VU GROUP. LLC iGCJJEC IN IML'$w!{i 9F THE SM ip ff SECTION Y7, Page 19 Page 204 Item#16. i i Goa 1 3 13r:�0:0 5caio: i inch= 111 feet File-Broday Square Annexation Dese.nd TW 1'ISM%+crm Ck"m E 41.1541x 4.01 fl.CIA995 41}.P43nmomr-,..?44 71. 41 nmL3w i 2n.19 02 sf9.1741 M.1 03 sm.%Iw M.lz i 1tfln1752W6648 Page 20 Page 205 Item#16. Description for West Daphne Street Vacation March 6, 2020 A portion of 11Wa8t Daphne Street right of way as shown on Black Cat Estates No_ 2, as tiled in Book 32 of Plats at Pages 1945 and 1946, records of Ada County, Idaho, situated within the Southwest 114 of the Southwest 114 of Section 27, Township 4 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, Ala County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows, Commencing at the Section corner common to Sections 27r 28, 33, and 34, T.4N. R.1VV. B.M. from which the 1/4 corner cornmon to said Sections 27 and 28 bears North 00031'09" East, 263T37 feet, thence on the 1+Vest boundary line of said Section 7, North 00°S1'09" East, 634.40 feet; thence on the Westerly extension of and the South right-of-war Eire of West Daphne Street, South 89'1658" EaStr 230,00 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING: thence leaving said South right-cf-way line, North 00°31'09" East, 50.00 feet to the North right-of-war line of West Daphne Street; thence on said North right-of-wayline, South 89°16'58" East, 73.80 feet; thence leaving said forth right-of-way line, South 00°31'09" West, 50.00 feet to said South right-of-war line; thence on said South right-of-way line, North 8901658" �I1est, 273.80 feet to tale REAL POINT OF BEGINNING, Containing 13,690 square feet or 0.31 acres, more or less_ End of Description. Page 21 Page 206 Item#16. 4f4IV W 40 160 2a 27 0 24 80 I r I SCALE; 1* = 80' I I � BLOCK 2 AACY CAP ESTATES r NO. z s€BD vfsf0N I 0 5$6't6 WE 27�3,90' C53MNlei _ $Wf6'58"E 2X.00' --.- -- - titerr , W j7,3 m REAL }01NT OF BEWNINC r , i r OLOCK I 4 BLACK CAT ESTATE'S - { SUED!Vf,Sl4r tp - I I p , - r , LAN0 — 3T, 1�1CL �79 L .4 I�' IAH E}LROT DRY IMNG FOR afire k+ . PIMP a� pa�o.r f4IVfl l 77 1r V �Ll7 1R rpcc.Q— . . #t �� WEST DNPHNE STREET 1 GROUP, L L f'�V MUM M IM W /4 OF TW ie i e4 a WqnRl 27, M VATE Page 22 Page 207 Item#16. VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. A Development Agreement(DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance,a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. The Development Agreement shall require the rear and/or sides of 2-story structures on Lots 11-21,Block 1 and Lots 2-6,Block 2 that face N. Black Cat Road to incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g. projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. Planning approval will be required at time of building permit. b. The Development Agreement shall have a restriction that homes on Lots 8-10, Block 1 should be limited to one-story. c. The Development Agreement shall add a condition for a concrete wall and berm to be constructed along the property line adjacent to 5230 N. Black Cat Road. d. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat, landscape plan and conceptual building elevations for the single-family dwellings included in Section VIII and the provisions contained herein. 2. This approval is based upon ACHD vacating the requested section of Daphne St. 3. The plat included in Section VII, dated 7/1/2020, shall be revised as follows prior to submittal of the final plat application: i. A stub street shall be provided to the nei4h ffem Avilla Dr-ive dffettgh Bleek 1. This is the 4. The landscape plan included in Section VII.C,dated 2�'%0 7/1/2020, shall be revised as follows prior to submittal of the final plat application: a. The nei4hefa and sewhem pathways shall eameet at the pond to r-esult in a eantintious pathway aleng the pend-. b. SiAing and passive r-eer-eation areas shall be depieted an the landseape plan-. c. The fencing shown in Block 3 shall be revised to be open style as required per UDC 11- 3A-7. 5. The applicant will submit a tree mitigation plan at time of final plat. This mitigation plan shall indicate the total number and caliper inches of trees proposed for removal and the total number of replacement trees proposed. Page 23 Page 208 Item#16. 6. Future development shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 for all buildable lots. 7. The applicant shall comply with all provisions of 11-3A-3 with regard to access to streets. 8. The development shall comply with standards and installation for landscaping as set forth in UDC 11-3B-5 and maintenance thereof as set forth in UDC 11-3B-13. 9. The plat shall comply with the provisions for irrigation ditches,laterals, canals and/or drainage courses, as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6. 10. Pathway and adjoining fencings and landscaping shall be constructed consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7A7, 11-3A-8 and 11-3B-12C. 11. The development shall comply with all subdivision design and improvement standards as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3, including but not limited to cul-de-sacs, alleys, driveways, common driveways, easements,blocks, street buffers, and mailbox placement. 12. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family detached dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 13. An exhibit shall be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks, fencing, building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via the common driveway; if a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street,the driveway shall be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway as set forth in UDC 11- 6C-3D. 14. For the common driveway that serves a dual purpose(i.e. driveway/emergency access), signage shall be provided to notify residents that the common driveway is a no parking zone. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 No sanitary sewer mainlines are allowed in the common driveways. 1.2 No sanitary sewer manholes are allowed in common driveways or sidewalks. 1.3 No dead-end water mainlines are allowed in common driveways. 1.3 Provide a"to and through" sanitary sewer mainline connection to the property to the south. 1.4 Modeling analysis must be completed at Final Plat to verify minimum fire flow pressure is met at each phase. 1.5 The geotechnical investigative report prepared by AllWest indicates some very specific construction considerations. The applicant shall be responsible for the adherence of these recommendations to help ensure that groundwater does not become a problem within crawlspaces of homes. 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three Page 24 Page 209 Item#16. feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x 11"map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year- round source of water(MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available,a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals,or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B.Whitney at(208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing,landscaping, amenities, etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. Page 25 Page 210 Item#16. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least I-foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for Page 26 Page 211 Item#16. surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. ACHD https://weblink.meridianciV.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=186071&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ky D. MERIDIAN FIRE DEPARTMENT(MFD) https://weblink.meridianciV.oLvlWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=186071&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Lty E. COMPASS https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=188452&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ky F. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY https://weblink.meridiancioy.org/WebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=186718&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC iv IX. FINDINGS A.Annexation and/or Rezone,and Vacation of ROW(UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the Council shall make a full investigation and shall at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Commission finds annexation of the subject site with an R-8 zoning designation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan MDR FL UM designation for this property if the Applicant complies with the provisions in Section VIII. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Commission finds the lot sizes proposed combined with the housing types proposed will be consistent with the purpose statement of the residential districts in that a range of housing opportunities will be provided consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The Commission finds that the proposed zoning map amendment and vacation of Daphne St. should not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. The Commission recommends the Council consider any oral or written testimony that may be provided when determining this finding. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and Page 27 Page 212 Item#16. The Commission finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not result in any adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of City: The Commission finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City if the property is developed in accord with the provisions in Section VIII. B.Preliminary Plat(UDC 11-613-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision making body shall make the following findings: (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15- 2005) 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; (Ord. 08-1372, 7-8-2008, eff. 7-8-2008) The Commission finds the proposed plat is generally in conformance with the UDC if the Applicant complies with the conditions of approval in Section IX. 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Commission finds public services can be made available to the subject property and will be adequate to accommodate the proposed development. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; The Commission finds the proposed plat is in substantial conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's CIP. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Commission finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The Commission finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. (Ord. 05-1170, 8- 30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) The Commission is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that need to be preserved with this development. Page 28 Page 213 Item#17. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Revised Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Quartet Northeast (H- 2020-0017) and Quartet Southeast (H-2020-0018) by Brighton Development, Located at 4020 & 2430 N. Black Cat Rd. Page 214 Item#17. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ... AND DECISION& ORDER , In the Matter of the Request for Annexation of a Total of 68.73 acres of Land with R-8 (48.42 acres) and C-G(20.31 acres) Zoning Districts, and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 137 Buildable Lots (136 Residential and 1 Commercial), 19 Common Lots, and 2 Other Lots on 66.52 acres of Land in the R-8 and C-G Zoning Districts for Quartet Northeast; and Annexation of a Total of 22.26 Acres of Land with an R-8 Zoning District and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 50 Buildable Lots and 10 Common Lots on 19.92 Acres of Land in the R-8 Zoning District for Quartet Southeast by Brighton Development,Inc. Case No(s). H-2020-0017& H-2020-0018 For the City Council Hearing Date of: July 28,2020 (Findings on August 11,2020)—Revised Findings on September 8, 2020 A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019, Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR QUARTET NORTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0017&QUARTET SOUTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0018 - 1 Page 215 Item#17. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's requests for annexation&zoning and preliminary plat for Quartet Northeast and Quartet Southeast is hereby approved with the requirement of a Development Agreement per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years.Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again (UDC 11- 6B-7C). FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR QUARTET NORTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0017&QUARTET SOUTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0018 -2- Page 216 Item#17. Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28)days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR QUARTET NORTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0017&QUARTET SOUTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0018 -3 Page 217 Item#17. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 8th day of September 2020. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED YEA COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED YEA COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED YEA COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED YEA MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 9-8-2020 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR QUARTET NORTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0017&QUARTET SOUTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0018 -4- Page 218 Item#17. EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT � 1 ��, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 7/28/2020 legend DATE: f ILIProject La -o-Ron TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner i 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: H-2020-0017 Quartet Northeast H-2020-0018 Quartet Southeast LOCATION: 4020&4340 N. Black Cat Rd. [Parcels: #S0434233652; SO434244210; 50434233920; S0434325860 (partial), in the west '/4 of Section 34,TAN.,R.1W.] 1 ' I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Quartet Northeast(NE): Annexation of a total of 68.73 acres of land with R-8 (48.42 acres) and C-G(20.31 acres)zoning districts; and Preliminary Plat consisting of 137 buildable lots(136 residential and 1 commercial), 19 common lots, and 2 other lots on 66.52 acres of land in the R-8 and C-G zoning districts. Quartet Southeast(SE): Annexation of a total of 22.26 acres of land with an R-8 zoning district; and Preliminary plat consisting of 50 buildable lots and 10 common lots on 19.92 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district.Note:A property boundary adjustment application is currently in process with Ada County that will reconfigure the boundary of this property consistent with the Record of Survey(ROS)shown in Section VIII.A; the Applicant anticipates this application will be approved and the ROS recordedprior to the City Council hearing. Therefore, the annexation andplat boundaries are based on the boundary shown on the ROS and not the current parcel configuration shown on the maps included in this report. Because NMID owns the land where the Five Mile Creek is located which lies between the two properties proposed for development and does not wish for their land to be included in the subdivision, two (2)separate preliminary plat applications are required. Because the site is being developed as one overall property, one staff report has been prepared for both projects which includes analysis for each individual plat as well as for the overall development. The overall annexation area includes the Five Mile Creek as zoning goes to the centerline of waterways. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 66.52(NE)+ 19.92(SE)=86.44 acres(overall) Existing/Proposed Zoning RUT in Ada County(existing);R-8 and C-G(proposed) Pagel Page 219 Item#17. Description Details I Page Future Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential(MDR)(3-8 units/acre)(50+/-acres)&Mixed Use—Non-Residential(MU-NR)(41+/-acres) Existing Land Use(s) Rural residential/agricultural Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family residential(SFR),commercial Lots(#and type;bldg./common) 186 residential buildable lots; 1 commercial buildable lot;29 common lots; and 2 other lots for shared driveways Phasing Plan(#of phases) 3 phases(overall between both subdivision) Number of Residential Units(type 186 detached SFR homes of units) Density(gross&net) NE:2.93 units/acre(gross);4.73 units/acre(net) SE:2.51 units/acre(gross);4.86 units/acre(net) NE&SE(overall):2.8 units/acre(gross);4.76 units/acre(net) Open Space(acres,total NE: 7.6 acres [%]/buffer/qualified) SE: 3.4 acres NE&SE(overall): 11 acres(or 13%) Amenities Swimming pool,multi-use pathways,an additional 2.36+acres qualified open space beyond the minimum required and a tot lot with children's play equipment. Physical Features(waterways, Land containing the Five Mile Creek bisects the two(2)preliminary plats;a hazards,flood plain,hillside) portion of the site is within the floodplain in an approximate(A)zone. The Creason Lateral runs along the eastern portion of the north boundary of Quartet Northeast subdivision. Neighborhood meeting date;#of 1/21/20;9 attendees attendees: History(previous approvals) None B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Yes • Requires ACHD No Commission Action (yes/no) Traffic Impact Study(yes/no) Yes Access Two(2)accesses(Bell Tower Dr.,a local street&San Remo St.,a collector street) (Arterial/Collectors/State are proposed via N.Black Cat Rd.,an arterial street. Hwy/Local)(Existing and Black Cat Rd.is currently improved with 2-travel lanes and no curb,gutter or Proposed) sidewalk abutting the site.There is 50-70'of ROW for Black Cat Rd. (17-20' from centerline). Traffic Level of Service Better than"D"(Acceptable level of service is"E") Stub (1)collector and(1)local stub street is proposed to the north and(1)local stub Street/Interconnectivity/Cross street is proposed to the south to adjacent properties for future extension as Access depicted on the plat. Existing Road Network There are no existing streets within the site and no stub streets to the site;N.Black Cat Rd. exists along the west boundary of the site Existing Arterial Sidewalks/ There is no existing sidewalk or buffer along N.Black Cat Rd. ' Buffers Page 2 Page 220 Item#17. Description Details Page Proposed Road Capital ImprGvmne,Ybt PlAn�CIPV hA&gndad Five Ydar Work PI an ffYWP}: Improvements + �M=k Cat Road it Limbed M(ha CIP to ba wiftmd to&Ears irtrm McMIllars Road to Ustick Road between 2021 and 2025 • The intaraectipn of McJulUan Rued and E3iack Cat Rand is listed in the CIP to he eecactS"Cted as a mulll•tane mundaboul wdh 4-lanes on the rronh leg.4-lanes an the south,2•Ianes oast, and 24anes on the west Eeg,anil nxoorrstruclad between 202B end 2030. The mnE&sacbm of UsLm%Road and Black Cat Road Is Fasted In the C IP to be reconstructed as a dual4ane roundabout with 44anes an the rwrih leg,daanas an the south,44anes east, and 44anes an the west log.sno teoonslrudad betwftn 2021 ana 2025. A dedicated northbound right-turn lane&dedicated southbound left-turn lane is required to be constructed on Black Cat Rd.at Bell Tower Dr. &San Remo St. as recommended in the TIS. Fire Service • Distance to Fire Station 2 miles • Fire Response Time Falls within 5 minute response time goal - • Resource Reliability 76%-target goal is 80%or greater—does not meet the targeted goal • Risk Identification 2—current resources would not be adequate to supply service to this project • Accessibility Project meets all required access,road widths and turnarounds. • Special/resource needs Project will require an aerial device;response time is 12 minutes travel time- can't meet this need in the required timeframe if a truck company is required. • Water Supply Requires 1,000 gallons per minute for one hour,may be less if buildings are fully sprinklered. • Other Resources Police Service • Distance to Police 6.5 miles Station • Police Response Time Just under 5 minutes from Police Dept.;response time goal for emergencies is 3-5 minutes. • Calls for Service 283 (within a mile of site between 3/l/2019-2/29/2020) • Accessibility No concerns • Specialty/resource needs No additional resources are required at this time. • Crimes 28(within a mile of site between 3/l/2019-2/29/2020) • Crashes 19(within a mile of site between 3/l/2019-2/29/2020) • Other The MPD can provide service if this development is approved as they already serve this area. West Ada School District �nrollrnent capml • Distance(elem,ms, UM la NZDU hs) Messent 41ew Elementary Y a 675 9 kbpW • Capacity of Schools Slav Middle Sehool 542 loan 63 • #of Students Meridian Nigh School a961 7404 4.0 Enrolled Que to the abundant arnoLmt of growth In the area.West Ada Is aetlyely hulldeng new school$,and boundaries an always rha+ ft.These hiture studtmu5 could potentially 8.tler4 Owyhee 141�h School, • Estimated#of 110 (NE)+40(SE)= 150 students from this development Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Directly adjacent Services • Sewer Shed North Black Cat Trunk Shed • Estimated Project Sewer See application ERU's Page 3 Page 221 Item#17. • WRRF Declining 13.92 Balance • Project Consistent with Yes WW Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts/Concerns Applicant to ensure that the depths of the sanitary sewer allows for service of the property to the SE of Quartet Northeast per the Meridian Wastewater Master Plan. Water • Distance to Water Directly adjacent Services • Pressure Zone 1 • Estimated Project Water See application ERU's • Water Quality None • Project Consistent with Yes Water Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns The water main in N.Joy Way(furthest east road)should be a 12-inch.In addition,the water main in N.Joy Way will need to continue south through Quartet Southeast to provide a second connection out to Black Cat Rd.with the second hase of the development. C. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend 0 Legend 0 ��Project Lflcfliior �Wojec#LflcgioPs ii I�e R ria • Page 4 Page 222 Item#17. Zoning Map Planned Development Map Legend C-00 -Legend -- 0 0 ff ff Proyect Lacainon IetProject Lccasor R- i Ci9y LlrniEs R-1 _ +- I — Planned Parcels R- R-N R- RU T' - R- C: L - R x---- RU R- R9 R'' III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Brighton Development, Inc.—2929 W.Navigator#400,Meridian, ID 83642 B. Owner: Quenzer Farms, LLLP—3680 N. Black Cat Rd.,Meridian, ID 83646 C. Representative: Michael D. Wardle,Brighton Corporation—2929 W.Navigator#400,Meridian,ID 83642 IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Notification published in 5/29/2020 7/10/2020 newspaper Notification mailed to property owners within 300 feet 5/26/2020 7/8/2020 Applicant posted public hearing 4/22/2020 7/15/2020 notice on site Nextdoor posting 5/27/2020 7/8/2020 V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS(Comprehensive Plan) Land Use: The Future Land Use Map(FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan designates the western 50+/-acres of the property as Medium Density Residential(MDR)and the eastern 41+/-acres as Mixed Use— Non-Residential(MU-NR). A City Park is also conceptually designated on the FLUM in this general area. Page 5 Page 223 Item#17. The MDR designation allows for dwelling units at gross densities of 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The purpose of the MU-NR designation is to designate areas where new residential dwellings will not be permitted, as residential uses are not compatible with the planned and/or existing uses in these areas. For example, MU-NR areas are used near the City's Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility and where there are heavy industrial or other hazardous operations that need to be buffered from residential. Developments are encouraged to be designed similar to the conceptual MU-NR plan depicted in Figure 3E in the Comprehensive Plan(see page 3-18). Transportation: The Master Street Map(MSM) depicts a collector street from W. McMillan Rd. to the project's north boundary near the northeast corner of the site and a multi-lane roundabout at the mid-mile on Black Cat Rd. The Map depicts a future east/west collector street near the half mile on the west side of Black Cat. A collector street(San Remo St./N. Joy Way) is proposed from N. Black Cat Rd. to the north boundary in accord with the MSM. ACHD is not requiring a roundabout be constructed at this time as they feel it's not warranted based on the Traffic Impact Study(TIS) although additional right-of-way(ROW) is required to be dedicated to accommodate the future construction of the multi-lane roundabout. Proposed Development: The Applicant proposes to develop 66.35 acres of the subject overall property with 186 single-family detached dwelling units at an overall gross density of 2.8 units per acre; and 20.09 acres with non-residential/commercial uses to be determined in the future consistent with the FLUM. The eastern 18 acre residential portion of Quartet Northeast is located within the MU-NR designated area,which is a non-residential designated area that provides approximately a'/4 mile separation and buffer to the City's wastewater facility.Because the FLUM is not parcel specific,the Applicant requests the MDR designation on the western portion of the property is extended to the collector street(N.Joy Way), which bisects the eastern portion of the property.The portion of the property east of the collector street is proposed to be zoned C-G and developed with non-residential/commercial uses. Because the collector street will provide a"break"to future non-residential/commercial uses similar to that shown on the concept diagram for MU-NR designated areas included in the Comprehensive Plan (see Figure 3E on pg.3-18), Staff is amenable to this proposal if deemed appropriate by City Council. Staff does have concerns with residential uses in such close proximity to the Wastewater facility as foul odors are a concern in this area,thus the reason for the"non-residential"designation.For this reason, residential may not be a compatible use in this area.City Council should make this determination.Note: The Public Work's Dept. anticipates doing a noise%dor study later this year to determine the current impacts of the facility on adjacent properties, which may change the boundary of the MU-NR designated area. The Park's Dept. is not pursuing a City park in this location at this time; however,the non- residential/commercial lot(Lot 1,Block 14) on the east side of the collector street adjacent to the wastewater facility may be considered for a potential park site with a future development application on that property. Prior to any development occurring on this lot,the Applicant should coordinate with the Park's Department to determine if a City park is needed in this area. The following Comprehensive Plan Policies are applicable to this development: • "Encourage a variety of housing types that meet the needs, preferences, and financial capabilities of Meridian's present and future residents."(2.01.02D) Only one housing type is proposed in this development (i.e. single-family detached). The residential developments in this vicinity also contain standard single-family detached homes. Because this site is in close proximity to the City's Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility, Staff does not recommend a mix of housing types is provided as it would likely increase the density in this area, which is not desired. Page 6 Page 224 Item#17. • "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and urban services at the time of final approval,and in accord with any adopted levels of service for public facilities and services."(3.03.03F) City water and sewer service is available and can be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. • "Avoid the concentration of any one housing type or lot size in any geographical area;provide for diverse housing types throughout the City."(2.01.01 G) Only one housing type is proposed in this development(i.e. single-family detached); the minimum lot size proposed is 6,866 with an average lot size of 9,145 square feet, which will accommodate a variety of housing styles consisting of I-and 2-story units. • "Encourage compatible uses and site design to minimize conflicts and maximize use of land." (3.07.00) The proposed single-family residential development is compatible with other residential and agricultural uses in the area; the future non-residential/commercial development should be compatible with the existing Wastewater facility to the southeast. The proposed residential uses in the MU-NR designated area may not be compatible with the Wastewater facility. The Public Work's Dept. anticipates doing a noise%dor study later this year to determine the current impacts of the facility on adjacent properties, which may change the boundary of the MU-NR designated area. • "With new subdivision plats,require the design and construction of pathway connections, easy pedestrian and bicycle access to parks, safe routes to schools,and the incorporation of usable open space with quality amenities." (2.02.01A) Segments of the City's multi-use pathway system are proposed off-site along the north boundary of the Five Mile Creek and along the east side of the proposed collector street in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. Detached sidewalks are proposed along the arterial and collector streets for safe pedestrian access. Usable open space and quality amenities are proposed(see detailed analysis below in Section VI.B). • "Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development."(3.03.03A) The proposed development will connect to City water and sewer systems;services are proposed to be provided to and though this development in accord with current City plans. • "Discourage residential land uses in close proximity to the Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility, the Intermountain Gas Facility on Can-Ada Road, and other incompatible land uses." (3.06.02E) The eastern 18 acre portion of the site in Quartet Northeast is within the MU-NR designated area on the FL UM, which is in close proximity to the wastewater facility. The expansion of residential uses in this area may not be compatible with the wastewater facility due to odors associated with the facility. • "Maximize public services by prioritizing infill development of vacant and underdeveloped parcels within the City over parcels on the fringe."(2.02.02) The proposed project is located in part of a larger "enclave"around the City's wastewater facility; development of this property will assist in maximizing public services. • "Require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks,water and sewer utilities."(3.03.03G) Page 7 Page 225 Item#17. Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter and sidewalks is required to be provided with development as proposed. • "Annex lands into the corporate boundaries of the City only when the annexation proposal conforms to the City's vision and the necessary extension of public services and infrastructure is provided." (3.03.03) The proposed development plan is generally consistent with the City's vision in terms that medium density residential and non-residential uses are proposed;public services can be provided and infrastructure will be extended with development. • "Require collectors consistent with the ACHD Master Street Map(MSM), generally at/near the mid- mile location within the Area of City Impact."(6.01.03B) A collector street(San Remo St./N.Joy Way) is proposed from N. Black Cat Rd. that stubs to the north for future extension to McMillan Rd in accord with the MSM, which depicts a collector street from McMillan Rd. to the northeast corner of the proposed residential development. • "Plan for and allow land uses surrounding the Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility that reduce human exposure to odors."(4.10.01A) The residential uses proposed on 18 acres in Quartet Northeast in the MU-NR designated area may expose humans to odors associated with the wastewater facility. • "Coordinate with developers, irrigation districts,and drainage entities to implement the proposed pathway network along canals, ditches, creeks,laterals and sloughs."(3.08.02B) A 10 foot wide multi-use pathway is proposed along the north side of the Five Mile Creek adjacent to the south boundary of the Quartet Northeast preliminary plat on NMID's property. • "Slow the outward progression of the City's limits by discouraging fringe area development; encourage development of vacant or underutilized parcels currently within City limits."(4.05.03B) The proposed project is in a larger enclave area around the City's wastewater facility and is not on the fringe. Staff believes the proposed development plan is generally consistent with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density and transportation if City Council determines an extension of the MDR designation on the abutting 18 acres of land to the east is appropriate for the area currently designated MU- NR. VI. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ANALYSIS UD A. Annexation&Zoning: The Applicant proposes to annex a total of 90.99 acres of land between the two subdivisions with R-8 (70.68 acres)and C-G(20.31 acres) zoning consistent with the associated MDR and MU-NR FLUM designations in the Comprehensive Plan as discussed above in Section V. At the request of the City,the Applicant included the 0.97 acre out-parcel at the southwest corner of the Quartet Northeast subdivision where a sewer lift station is located in the annexation boundary. The single-family residential and future non-residential/commercial uses planned to develop on this site are consistent with uses desired in this area as discussed above in Section V. A conceptual development plan was not submitted for the non-residential/commercial lot proposed to be zoned C-G;the Applicant states this lot will be the subject of future discussion with the City regarding a potential park site as depicted on the FLUM or consideration of other potential buffer uses determined by the results of the Public Work's noise/odor study. Page 8 Page 226 Item#17. The annexation area is within the Area of City Impact Boundary(AOCI). Legal descriptions for the annexation area are included in Section VIII.B; separate descriptions were submitted for each of the preliminary plat applications. The City may require a development agreement(DA)in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. In order to ensure the site develops as proposed with this application,staff recommends a DA as a provision of annexation with the provisions included in Section IX.The DA is required to be signed by the property owner(s)/developer and returned to the City within 6 months of the Council granting the annexation for approval by City Council and subsequent recordation. The Record of Survey depicted in Section VIII.A should be approved by Ada County and recorded prior to approval of the annexation ordinance and the Development Agreement for this project. Additionally,as a provision of the Development Agreement,Staff recommends the Applicant is required to coordinate with the Park's Dept.prior to development of the C-G zoned portion of the site on the east side of the collector street to determine if a City park is needed in that area. B. Preliminary Plat: Two separate preliminary plats, Quartet Northeast and Quartet Southeast, are proposed due to land owned by NMID containing the Five Mile Creek bisecting the two properties. Because both plats are proposed to develop and be marketed as one overall project, Staffs analysis is based on the overall project. Quartet Northeast consists of 137 buildable lots(136 residential and 1 commercial), 19 common lots,and 2 other lots on 66.52 acres of land in the R-8 and C-G zoning districts; and Quartet Southeast consists of 50 buildable lots and 10 common lots on 19.92 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district. Overall, a total of 186 residential buildable lots, 1 commercial buildable lot, 29 common lots and 2 other lots are proposed between the two subdivisions. The minimum lot size proposed overall is 6,866 square feet(s.f.)with an average lot size of 9,145 s.£.;the gross density overall is 2.8 units/acre with a net density of 4.76 units/acre. The subdivision is proposed to develop in three(3)phases as depicted on the plat(see Section VIII.C). The first two phases are located along N. Black Cat Rd.with the third and final phase on the eastern portion of the site. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There is one existing home and accessory structures within the boundary of each preliminary plat that are proposed to remain on Lot 11,Block 7, Quartet Southeast and Lot 2,Block 1, Quartet Northeast subdivision. All existing accessory structures that don't comply with the setback standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 should be removed prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat on the phase in which they're located. The existing homes are required to disconnect from private service and hook up to City water and sewer service within 60 days of such services becoming available as set forth in MCC 9-1-4 and 9-4-8 respectively.Existing wells may be used for irrigation purposes only. The addresses of these homes will also be subject to change with subdivision of the property. Proposed Use Analysis: Single-family detached dwellings are listed as a principal permitted use in the R-8 zoning district per UDC Table 11-2A-2.Allowed uses in the C-G district are listed in UDC Table 11-2B-2. Although some residential uses are allowed in the C-G zoning district per UDC Table 11-2B-2, Staff recommends as a provision of the DA that no residential uses be developed on the non- residential/commercial C-G zoned lot on the east side of the collector street,including but not limited to, a multi-family development, a vertically integrated residential project, and/or a nursing/residential care facility unless a subsequent Noise and Odor Study conducted by the City determines residential uses are appropriate in that area. Page 9 Page 227 Item#17. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): Development of the subject property is required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district and 11-2B-3 for the C-G district. Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards (UDC 11-6C-3) Development of the subdivision is required to comply with the subdivision design and improvement standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3, including but not limited to streets, common driveways and easements. There are two(2)common driveways proposed on common lots(i.e. Lots 10 and 16,Block 1); such driveways should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. A perpetual ingress/egress easement is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. An exhibit should be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks,fencing, building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via the common driveway; if a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street,the driveway should be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway.Address signage should be provided at the public street for homes accessed via common driveways for emergency wayfinding purposes. Access(UDC 11-3A-3) One(1)collector street(San Remo St./N.Joy Way)access is proposed in Quartet Southeast and one(1) local street access is proposed in Quartet Northeast via N. Black Cat Rd. The collector street is proposed to stub to the north at the northeast corner of the site for future extension to W. McMillan Rd. Local stub streets are proposed to the north and south to adjacent properties for future extension as depicted on the preliminary plats in Section VIII.C. Direct lot access via the arterial(Black Cat Rd.) and collector(San Remo St/N. Joy Way) streets is prohibited;the existing access via Black Cat Rd. for the home proposed to remain on Lot 2,Block 1 Quartet Northeast subdivision shall be removed and access taken from Belltower Dr. The bridge across the Five Mile Creek and the gravel fire access road from Black Cat Rd.in the location where the collector street is proposed is required to be constructed for emergency access for any development over 30 homes/lots as approved by the Fire Department. Because N.Joy Way is proposed to stub at the north boundary and is longer than 150' without a Fire Department approved turn around,the Fire Dept. requests a Type III barricade is placed at the intersection of N.Joy Way and Grand Rapids Dr.to prevent access until the street is extended in the future.The construction drawings should be revised to include this change.As an alternative to a barricade, a Fire Dept. approved turnaround could be provided at the end of the collector street. Parking(UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family detached dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. Future development should comply with these standards. Parking for non-residential uses is required per the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-6B.1. Pathways(UDC 11-3A-8): The Pathways Master Plan depicts a segment of the City's multi-use pathway system along the north side of the Five Mile Creek; and along the north and a short portion of the east side of the Quartet Northeast property. The Applicant proposes to construct an off-site 10-foot wide multi-use pathway along the north side of the Five Mile Creek and a detached 10-foot wide sidewalk/multi-use pathway along the east side of the collector street(N. Joy Way),north of the creek,to the north boundary of Quartet Northeast per discussions with the Park's Department. Legal descriptions for the pathway alignments (14-feet wide) Page 10 Page 228 Item#17. should be submitted to the City in order for the pathways to be added to the City's Master Pathways Agreement. The pathway proposed on NMID's property will require a license agreement with NMID for the pathway and associated landscaping required by UDC 11-311-12C. The UDC (11-3B-12C) requires a 5-foot wide landscape strip to be provided along each side of the pathway,landscaped with a mix of trees,shrubs,lawn, and/or other vegetative groundcover.A minimum of one trees is required per 100 linear feet of pathway; the calculations table included on the landscape plan does not include the linear feet of pathways or trees proposed to demonstrate compliance with this requirement—the revised plan submitted with the final plat application should include this information. If NMID does not approve the pathway and associated landscaping to be located on their property, the pathway should be provided in a minimum 20-foot wide common lot within Quartet Northeast subdivision within a 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement. Staff recommends pedestrian pathways are provided from the internal sidewalks along Miramente Ct. and Miramente Dr.through adjacent common areas to the multi-use pathway along the Five Mile Creek; and micro-pathways are provided through Lot 10,Block 4 and Lot 7,Block 3 for pedestrian interconnectivity within the subdivision. All pathways shall be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8 and the Pathways Master Plan. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-1 The UDC(11-3A-17)requires, at a minimum, detached sidewalks to be provided along arterial and collector streets and attached sidewalk to be provided along local streets. Detached sidewalks are proposed along all internal streets,except around the cul-de-sacs, and within the street buffer adjacent to N. Black Cat Rd. and San Remo St./N. Joy Way in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-1 Eight-foot wide parkways are proposed adjacent to all streets where detached sidewalk are proposed; all parkways are required to be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): A 25-foot wide street buffer is required adjacent to N.Black Cat Rd., an arterial street; and a 20-foot wide street buffer is required adjacent to San Remo St./N. Joy Way, a collector street, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C, as proposed. Parkways are required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17 and 11-3B- 7C. Landscaping is proposed in accord with UDC standards. Landscaping is required along all pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C as discussed above. Common open space is required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3E. Landscaping is depicted in common areas in excess of UDC standards. There are existing trees on the site around the existing homes that are proposed to be retained that may require mitigation if removed. The Applicant should coordinate with Matt Perkins,the City Arborist,to determine mitigation requirements per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-10C.5 if existing trees are not proposed to be retained on the site.Any mitigation information shall be included in the calculations table on the landscape plan. Page 11 Page 229 Item#17. If the unimproved right-of-way is 10 feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line,the Developer is required to maintain a 10 foot compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of ACHD and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.5.A license agreement for improvements within the right-of-way is required between the property owner and ACHD. Qualified Open Space(UDC 11-3 : A minimum of 10%qualified open space meeting the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B is required to be provided with development. Based on the area of the Quartet Northeast plat(66.52 acres),a minimum of 6.65 acres of qualified open space should be provided.A total of 7.6 acres(or 11.5%)is proposed in excess of UDC standards consisting of half the street buffer along the arterial street(N. Black Cat Rd.), all of the street buffer along the collector street(N. Joy Way), internal linear open space and common areas exceeding 50' x 100' in area. Based on the area of the Quartet Southeast plat(19.92 acres),a minimum of 1.99 acres of qualified open space should be provided. A total of 3.4 acres(or 17%) is proposed in excess of UDC standards consisting of half the street buffer along the arterial street(N. Black Cat Rd.), all of the street buffer along the collector street(San Remo St./N. Joy Way), and internal linear open space. Qualified Site Amenities (UDC 11-3 A minimum of one(1) qualified site amenity is required for each 20 acres of land to be developed as set forth in UDC 11-3G-3. Based on the area of the Quartet Northeast plat(66.52 acres),a minimum of three(3) qualified site amenities are required to be provided. A community swimming pool, a tot lot containing children's play equipment, one acre of extra qualified open space beyond the minimum standards and segments of the City's multi-use pathway system are proposed in excess of UDC standards. Based on the area of the Quartet Southeast plat(19.92 acres),a minimum of one(1) qualified site amenity is required to be provided. An additional 1.41 acres of qualified open space beyond the minimum standards is proposed as a site amenity in accord with UDC standards. Because Quartet Northeast and Southeast subdivisions will develop as one and be under the same Homeowner's Association, and common open space and site amenities will be shared, Staff believes the proposed open space and site amenities are adequate for the development with the inclusion of the micropath connections as recommended above. Waterways(UDC 11-3A-'U"I: The Creason Lateral runs across the eastern portion of the north boundary of Quartet Northeast subdivision in Lot 34,Block 4 within a 40-foot wide easement and is proposed to be left open. Because this area is included in the qualified open space calculations for the site,it should be landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3E—no landscaping is depicted on the landscape plan for that area. The Five Mile Creek is contained within land owned by NMID that lies between the two proposed preliminary plats. The creek should be protected during construction. A portion of the site is within the Five Mile Creek floodplain in an approximate(A)zone which will require a floodplain permit application,including hydraulic and hydrologic analysis to define base flood elevations and a floodway prior to any development occurring in the overlay district—contact Jason Korn,Public Work's,with any questions. Fencing(UDC 11-3A- : All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6C and 11-3A-7. Fencing is proposed as shown on the landscape plan. Page 12 Page 230 Item#17. Six-foot tall solid wood fencing is proposed along the perimeter boundary of the site and along side yards adjacent to the street; and 5-foot tall clear vision fence is proposed adjacent to most internal common open space areas. To provide more visibility of the common area on Lot 34,Block 4 where the Creason Lateral is located, Staff recommends fencing adjacent to the common lot complies with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7A.7. The Creason Lateral is required to be fenced with an open vision fence at least 6' in height and having an 11-gauge,2"mesh or other construction,equivalent in ability to deter access to the waterway.If the Applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director that the waterway serves as or will be improved as a part of the development to be a water amenity as defined in UDC 11-1A-1,it is not required to be fenced per UDC 11-3A-6C.If it's improved as a water amenity, construction drawings and relevant calculations prepared by a qualified licensed professional registered in the State of Idaho shall be submitted to both the Director and the authorized representative of the water facility for approval. Staff recommends a break in the fence is provided on the south side of Lot 8,Block 6 adjacent to the Five Mile Creek for pedestrian access to the multi-use pathway. Storm Drainage: An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction is required to follow Best Management Practice as adopted by the City. Irrigation: Underground,pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided for each and every lot within the development in accord with MCC 9-1,Water Use and Service. Irrigation water will be provided from the Nampa&Meridian Irrigation District. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): The Applicant submitted several conceptual building elevations for the proposed single-family detached homes planned to be constructed in this development which are included in Section VIII.F. Homes depicted are a mix of 1-and 2-story units with building materials consisting of a variety of siding styles with stone/brick veneer accents.No elevations were submitted for the non-residential/commercial portion of the development as no development is proposed at this time. Because 2-story home elevations that face arterial and collector streets are highly visible, Staff recommends as a provision of the DA that the rear and/or side of structures on lots that face N. Black Cat Rd.,an arterial street, and San Remo St./N.Joy Way,a collector street,incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies, material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted and approved prior to submittal of any building permit applications for the swimming pool facility and the non- residential/commercial portion of the development. Design of these structures is required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual.Design review is not required for single- family detached homes. VII. DECISION A. Staff: If the City Council determines extending the MDR FLUM designation further to the east as proposed is appropriate, Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation and zoning with the requirement of a Page 13 Page 231 Item#17. Development Agreement and approval of the requested preliminary plats with the conditions noted in Section IX.A per the Findings in Section X. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on June 18,2020. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing a. In favor: Mike Wardle,Brighton Corp. (Applicant's Representative),Jon Wardle, Brighton Corp_ b. In opposition: None c. Commenting:None d. Written testimony: Carrie Hovey e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s) public testimony a. Concern pertaining to traffic &safety of existing 2-lane roadways and the amount of development occurring in this area which is worsening the situation and impact of more development on area schools—would like these applications to be rejected or at least postponed until road infrastructure and schools can be prepared to handle the additional impacts. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. Concerns pertaining to growth and traffic and the adequacy of existing infrastructure to handle more development until improvements are made in this area; IL. The option of requiring the noise/odor study to be complete prior to development of Phase 3 to determine if residential uses are appropriate in the area current MU-NR designated area. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Modification to condition#B 1.2 to require the water main in N.Joy Way to continue south through Quartet SE to provide a 2nd connection out to Black Cat Rd.with the 2nd phase of development, instead of the 1 st phase, as recommended b, Staff. 5. Outstanding issue(s)for City Council: a. None C. The Meridian Citv Council heard these items on July 28,2020.At the public hearing,the Council moved to approve the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Mike Wardle and Jon Wardle,Brighton Corn. b. In opposition: None C. Commenting: Denise LaFever d. Written testimony: Mike Wardle,Brighton Corp. (in agreement with the Commission's recommendation) e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen £ Other Staff commenting on application: Dale Bolthouse, Clint Dolsbv_ 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Opinion that it's not appropriate to approve C-G zoning without a development plan. b. Testimony from Dale Bolthouse that only 4 complaints have been received in the last 5 ears from downwind residents pertaining to an offensive odor generated from the wastewater treatment facility. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Council requested more information from Public Works in regard to the upcoming odor stud Page 14 Page 232 Item#17. b. Concern pertaining to approval of residential uses in the MU-NR designated portion of Phase 3 prior to obtaining results from an updated odor study to determine if residential uses are appropriate in that area: c. Possible condition on Phase 3 and the commercial portion of the development to ensure City has the ability to restrict residential uses and possibly other uses in the MU-NR designated area if the odor study reflects a significant impact on this area: d. Concern of allowing C-G zoning without a conceptual development plan showinghow the lot is to be developed. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. An odor study is required to be conducted by the City prior to development of Phase 3 to determine if residential uses are appropriate in the MU-NR designated area: if determined to not be appropriate,a modification to the DA shall be required to amend the development plan for that area(see new DA provision A.lil: a. Modify DA provision#A.1 f to require the DA to be modified to include a conceptual development plan for the C-G zoned area/lot prior to development. Page 15 Page 233 Item#17. VIII. EXHIBITS A. Record of Survey for Property Boundary Adjustment in Ada County(Not-Approved/Recorded) Mr kAl J + Bill Y Ij I l9 5 Fr 3 I z IE t M I Ay I F� water S t I I F I I I I ' Q q i . I I I ki �A ----•. .------ - ---- Page 16 Page 234 Item#17. B. Annexation Legal Description & Exhibit Map Quartet Northeast: lum 9233 WEST STATE STREET I SOISE,ID 83714 1 209.639.6939 1 FAX 208.639.6930 Aprll 10,2020 Project No.19-010 Exhibit A legal Dewription for Annexation Quartet Northeast A parcel of land situated in a portion of the South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 34,Township 4 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as Follows: Commencing at a brass cap marking the Northwest corner of said Section 34,which bears N00'2724"L a distance of 2,631.60 feet from an aluminum cap marking the West 1/4 corner of said Section 34,thence fallowing the westerly line of said Northwest 1/4,SCV27'24"W a distance of 1,315.80 feet to the North 1/16 corner of said Section 34 and Section 33 and being the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence leaving said westerly line and following the northerly line of said South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4,589'26'06"E a distance of 2,647.62 feet to an aluminum cap marking the Northeast corner of said South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4(C-N 1/16 corner); Thence leaving said northerly line and following the easterly line of Said South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4, SOC'43'47"W a distance of 1,323.39 feet to a 518-inch rebar marking the center of said Section 34; Thence leaving said easterly line and following the southerly line of said Northwest 1/4,N89'16'14"W a distance of 1,129.66 feet to the centerline of Five Mile Drain; Thence leaving said southerly line and following said centerline the fallowing eight (9)courses: 1. N38'17'55"W a distance of 133.84 feet; 2. N46'51'55"W a distance of 134.69 feet; 3. N73'28'41"W a distance of 107.91 feet; 4. N79'57'01"W a distance of 202.45 feet; 5. N77'05'23"W a distance of 11210 feet; 5. N79'05'40'W a distance of 325.25 feet; 7 N78'22'23"W a distance of 307.52 feet; 8, N78'15'35"W a distance of 100.49 feet; Thence leaving said centerline,N00°27'24"E a distance of 236.72 feet, Thence N89'32'3VW a distance of 195.Od feet to the westerly line of said Northwest 1/4; Thence following said westerly line,N00'27'24"E a distance of 654.43 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 69,735 acres,more or less. 1 Attached hereto is Exhibit B and bVthis reference is hereby made a part of. *v` a N 12459 a ' 0F % dq ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS I PIANNFRS Page 17 Page 235 Item#17. 0 0 w r- cn N WLL Kt NN6 m 'pal "�!I!WaW 'N1 0 �o oHn� o U N�. Q) 6p }t L LO 43 2 W 44 V O 0e y Q .Z9'Lti9L 3.5d,9L.685 .5: Ln C n m 41 x 2 alp m m O F U pt L oC 4 to r! M t+ N Z d to W W C Q Z w m M Y.. a U ai z N Z te N U Q rv- CC Q f17 a., Q P Qs N z ,�./ C3 b�+V7 4 N, y7 vy . N '�' d! W Lti Ir] C VS tiJ V7 �N 2�r �Yo ON4 O sm� ¢ xn g n �N mr �m fl en b Ln N y 1.4 I(p c N L tr,,� N Z IA ��[y ❑M Z � tlf �off �^+�r3u LU Ln "x r���U�3 z r J I CSUUi m �O iC 7 ar 2 p 8 O 3Uw 0 4i LL. ti N �lq Page 18 Page 236 Item#17. km 9233 VEST STATE STREET I 6015E,10 83714 I 208-539.6`339 I FAX 208.639,6930 April 10.2020 Project No.19-010 Exh€bit A t_egal Description for Rezone to R-8 Quartet Northeast A parcel of land situated in a portlon of the South 1/2 of the Northwest 114 of Section 34,Township 4 North, Range I West,Boise Mar ban,Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as follows. Camrnendng at a brans tap marking the Northwest corner of said Section 34,which bears 1300'27'24"E a distance of 2,631_&D feet from an aluminum cap marking the West 1/4 corner of said Section 3+4,thence following the westerly line of said Nort.hwest 1/4,500'27'24"W a distance of 1,315,80 feet to the North 1116 corner of said Section 34 and 5ertion 33 and tieing the POINT Of BEGINNING Thence leaving said westerly fine and following the northerly line of said South 112 of the Northwest 1/4,589'26'06"t a distance of 2.300.06 feet; Thence leavingsaW northerly line,S00a=3'WW a distance of 136.30feet, Thence 5 57.75 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right, Said Cure heaving a radius 4f 681.50 feat,a delta angle of W53'29", a-chord bearing of 524'=38"W and a chard distance of 542.51 feet; Thence S47'27'23'W a distance of 695_2B feat; Thence 33.19 feet along the arc of a circular curare to the right,said curve having a radius of 531.50 feet, a delta angle of 03'34'42",a chard bed rng of 549'1,V44"W and a Chord distance of 33.19 feet; Thence S51'02'05"Nr a distance of 148_04 feet to the centerline of We Mile Drain, Thence following said centerline the following eight(8)courses; 1, N38'17'55"W a distance of 11.8C1 feet; 2. N46'51'5 5"W a distance of 134159 feet, 3. N 7 3'2a'4 1'W a distance of 1t}7.81 ff�et 4. N 79'S7'01"W a distance of 202-45 feet; 5. R77'05'23"W a distance of 112.20 feet; 6. N79'05'4TW a distance of 326-25 feet, 7. N7 B'2 2o2 3'W a distance of 3D7.52 feet; S. N7 8'151 5"W a distance of 10OA9 feet; Thence leaving said centerline, N0Q'Z7'WE a distance of 23 6.7 2 feet;; Thence N89'32'36"W a distance cf 195.30 feet to the westerly Ilene of said Northwest 1{4; Thence following said westerly lute, NOE"27 24"E a distance of 664,43 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contairt5 a total of 48.42 acres,more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit R a nd by this reference is hereby made a part of. 014 w 12459 c ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS I PLANNERS Page 19 Page 237 Item#17. g c7 � a �C}� ran ,� P��eil!W�W I4M1 � � � ��, � � •i 4R ���� IN 93 EN t T s -A I. I W g1 ry en ?L 1�-}J luptog pasodDJd - r m ina'8Lnu*zlumaD r I LL, o n r' eY06 {u4Raod)0Z4jKZnpog I-pop)aZZi*a�a�tra6 ur fri Ivi � I lfll w n — — _ _ _ L s R } l0'CiECL AttL,aL, l i�,94�69N r� 31 Ql —'I-W Yi Il1S•XIMNI N4YX/Xh-a AYeh lrnn•r�unR•�tian•nvanw �n�,rn,�n,v mu s.�...a...������.. Page 20 Page 238 Item#17. hm 9233 WEST STATE STREET I BOISE,IEt 83714 1 208-639.6939 1 FAX 2C)8.639.6930 April 10,202.0 Project No.1"10 Exhibit A Leo Description for Rezone to C-G Quartet N rthcast A parcel of land situated in a portion of the South 1/2 bf the Northwest V4 of Sec tiort34,Township 4 North, Range 1 West,Boise Merldian,Ada Countyr Idaho and being mare particularly described as follows; Commencing at a brass cap marking the Northwest corner of said Section 34,which beam NQD°27'24"E a distance of 2,63L&O feet from an aluminum cap marking the West 114 corner of Bald Section S4,thence following the westerly line of said Northwest 114,S00'27'24"W a distance of 1,315.8C feet to the north 1/16 corner 4f said Sett Ion 34 8nd-Section 33; Thence leaving said westerly lute and Folowing the northerly lime of said South 112 of the Northwest 1/4,589"26'f56E a distance of 2,3p0-06 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING♦ Thence fal[owl ng said northerly liner S85*2VO6"E a distance of 347-56 feet to an aluminum rap marking the Northeast corder of said South 112 cf the Northwest 1/4(C-N 1f 15 corner)-, Thence leaving said northerly line a nd fc flowing the easterly line of said South 1/2 of the Northwest 114, 500'43'47"W a distance of 1,323.39 feel to a 5/8-inch rebar marking the center of sail 5Rction 34, Thence ieaving said easterly line anti toIlowing the w-utherly line of said Northwest 1J4, N89`16'34"W a distance of 1,a29,66 Fee#to the centerlineof Five Mile Drain; Thence leaving said southerly line and Following said centerlirrer N38417'55"W a distance of 122,04 feet; 7bence leavInG said centertiner N51*02"05"E a distance of 148-04 feet; Thence 33.19 feet along the aec of a circular curve to the left,said curve hawing a radius of531.50 feet,a delta angle of 03'34'42",a chord bearing of N4T14rWE and a chord distance of 33,19 fee#; Thence N47°27'23kE a distance of 695.2E feet; Thence 5S7.75 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 681.50 feet, a delta angle of 46,53'29",a chord bearing of N24°04'38"E and a chord distance of 542.31 feet; Thence N00°33'54"E adistance oF136-30 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. said parcel contains a total of 2031 acres,moreof less. Attached fie rato is Exhibit B and by this reference is hereby made a part of_ }.� 1 459 ./[).zwzo ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS I PLANNERS Page 21 Page 239 +m qz _ \ o m _ PHW5m 2 m m jr. , § :3 En�) \� 2 / e . § . \ a cz. \ 13 + ) o 2 § \ D $ ) .d 7§ \ /§ 13 IJ , r 2 § � j �/ o _¥ � 2 4-a «/ � }� § I ƒ ] E ) $ ¥ �- �k 2§ / q n 7 \ 7 1 � / ! 1 k 2 § \ O k 2 £ m)f / £ 2§ § & ■ !■ — — _ AT, &w»k § n AM } � cp I K; is } � ;gl| 5 �q� � Page 22 �7mo Item#17. Quartet Southeast: Ion 9233 WEST STATE STREET I SOISE,0 83714 1 208-639.6939 1 PAX 2t18.639.6930 April 10,2020 Project No.19-010 Exhibit A Legal Description for Annexation and Rezone to R-8 Quartet Southeast A parcel of land situated in a portion of the North 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 and a portion of the South 1/2 of the!Northwest 1/4 all in Section 34,Township 4 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an aluminum cap marking the West 1/4 corner of said Section 34,which bears 500°27'24"W a distance of 2,631.60 feet from a brass rap marking the Northwest corner of said Section 34,thence following the westerly line of said Northwest 1/4,N00°27'24"E a distance of 450,24 feet to the centerline of Five M ile ❑rain; Thence leaving said westerly line and following said centerline the following nine(9)courses: 1. S83°53'03"E a distance of 33.19 feet; 2. 578°15'35"E a distance of 265.65 feet; 3. S78°22'23"E a distance of 307.52 feet; 4. 579°05'40"E a distance of 326.25 feet; 5. S77°05'23"E a distance of 112.20 feet; 6. 579°57'01"E a distance of 202.45 feet; 7. 573'28'41"E a distance of 107.81 feet; 3. 546°51'55"E a distance of 134.69 feet; 9. 538'17'55"E a distance of 133.84 feet to the southerly line of said Northwest 1/4; Thence leaving said centerline and following said southerly line,N89"16'14"W a distance of 191-01 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Northeast corner of said West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4(C-W 1/16 corner}; Thence leaving said southerly line and`ollowing the easterly line of said West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4, $00°35'24"W a distance of 25.93 feet; Thence leaving said easterly line,60.97 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 517.00 feet,a delta angle of 06°45'23",a chord bearing of 547'09'17"W and a chord distance of 60.93 feet; Thence S43'46'36"W a distance of 306.45 feet Thence 423,64 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 520.00 feet,a delta angle of 46"40'43",a chord bearing of 567"06'57"W and a chord distance of 412-02 feet; Thence N89°32'41"W a distance of 589.03 feet; Thence 545°27'19"W a distance of 29A9 feet; Thence 500°27'12"W a distance of 79.36 feet; Thence N89"32'48"W a distance of 78.00 feet to the westerly line of said Southwest 1/4; Thence following said westerly line,N00'27'12"E a distance of 560.22 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 22.26 acres,more or less. PA Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is hereby made a part of. R' o 12459 o If OF L. a ENGINEERS 4 SURVEYORS I PLANNERS /0'?-02-0 Page 23 Page 241 Item#17. 28 2-j W. McMillan Rd. 33 34 FOUND BRASS CAP NORTHWEST CORNER SEC-11ON 34 0 125 250 500 N Scale: 1"=25Q' Unplatted SE053'03"E " 33.19' — S78'15'35"E 265.65' 578'22'23"E 307.52' S7705'40"E w � ! � 32$.25' S77'05'23"E x fi 11 112.20 S79'57'01'E q Mil ntFlIf1E Dr 202.45' z a117 S73328'41'E M 107.81` S46.51'55"E SE-43423392 U \134.69' POINT OF BEGINNING 53517'55'E FOUND ALUMINUM CAP 133.84' 33 wEST ir4 CORNER SECTION 34 SOO'35'24"W 34 — 25.93' — Annexation Area. 22.26±AC. ca N89'18'14 W Current Zoning: RUT 191,01' Proposed Zoning: R-8 ,yam` c--w 1/16 SO434325860(Portion'I &SO434234020{portion] SECTON 34 ry m"U f `1 S4527'19W p"I m 29.19' IUnplatted G r+l ab N89'32'41"W 589.03' z 500'27'12"W 79.36' 7500' 48 Unplatted FOUND ALUMINUM CAP SW CORNER SECTION 34 33 34 T.4N., R.1W.W. McMillan Rd. T.3N., RAW. — — �pl. LANq LEGEND '�� is FOUND BRASS CAP ; FOUND ALUMINUM CAP 12459 '0 kim �} 5/8—INCH REBAR rnj �O A CALCULATED POINT ¢,� �T£ 4I l4� 4a ANNEXATION & REZONE 6OUNDARY 'P4q► B N\- ENGFNEERS.SURVEYORS.PLANNERS ' -SECTION LINE • h, 7,0 9233 W EST STATF STREET NOISE.IDARO83714 YFFF]!LE(209)639 E939 FAX Ims)639-6936 Exhibit B Annexation and Rezone FATE' ApriF 202G PROJECT- 19-01G SHEET: Quartet Southeast Subdivision 1 OF 1 N112 W1/2 SW1/4 &51/2 NW1/4 Sec. 34, T4N, R1W, B.M., Ada County, ID Page 24 Page 242 Item#17. City Lift Station Lot: lam 9233 WEST STATE STREET I BOISE,ID 83714 1 208.639,6939 I FAX 20U39.6930 April 20,2020 Project No.19-010 Exhibit A Legal Description for Annexation and Rezone to R-8 City of Meridian Parcel A parcel of land situated in a portion of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 all in Section 34, Township 4 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a brass cap marking the northwest corner of said Section 34,which bears N0a°27'24"E a distance of 2,631.60 feet from an aluminum cap marking the west 1/4 of said Section 34,thence following the westerly line of said Northwest 1/4,S00°27'24"W a distance of 1,990.23 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence leaving said westerly line,S89'32'36"E a distance of 195.00 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence 500'27'24"W a distance of 236.72 feet to centerline of Five mile Drain; Thence following said centerline, N78'15'35"W a distance of 165.16 feet; Thence following said centerline, N83°53'03"W a distance of 33.19 feet to the westerly line of said Northwest 1/4; Thence leaving said centerline and following said westerly line, N00°27'24"E a distance of201.13feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 0.974 acres,more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is hereby made a part of. T 12459 Q a Ar L, BALti'� ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS I PLANNERS Page 25 Page 243 Item#17. 28 27 W. McMillan Rd. 33 34 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT N FOUND BRASS CAP NW CORNER SECT]ICN 34 I� M 0 ro I 0 56 100 200 I� N N Scale: 1"=10D' b 0 w POINT OF BEGINNING S89'32'36"E 195.Ofl' Z LEGEND FOUND BRASS CAP m N a � x FOUND ALUMINUM CAP o `' ��gi• S/B-INCH REBAR t+�x3 4�3p 3'�b`PgC A CALCULATED POINT m � $ �Qp��ien d °r$• $ o BOUNNDG4ATR E=IYN & REZON ��oPas� � +v��T,�as-µ, N83'53'a3"W 765 TB' 33.19' Fj � Mile Drain Uf U N y,4 Gl Lq ft� x � o 12459 33 34 19tg4 WEST FOUNO1/�lUCORNER SECTION 34 �MINUM CAP ����U�(�4-�"�Q` ENGINEERS.SUAVEVORS.PU4NNER5 �"� .�� 9233 5NE5T STATE 5TREET BORE,1DAHO83714 PHONE 12a6)639-693R FAX(206)639-69-M Exhibit B Annexation and Rezone to R-S DATE: April2000 PROJECT: 1B-Ot9 SHEET: City of Meridian Parcel -4130 N. Black Cat Rd. 1 OF 1 5W 1/4 NW 1/4 Sec. 34, T4N„ R1W., B.M.,Ada County, Idaho Page 26 Page 244 Item#17. C. Preliminary Plat(date: 1/31/2020) & Phasing Plan Quartet Northeast: QUARTET HORTHEMTSU&91Va94H PRE UMIrmuPLAT 1 h I1+dA{14411h4151RLL7F0IL THk SSHICY lfl 44 CHI wQrl7rrM'jT 111[II:IlCN loihwHrl l wffrK m*r.1 lw[Lr im Dr L■■OAN.JLh mu".CKYO e rh�u M Y 4 • ■ ■ .. FF V ■ 1{ R A P s n x 'r YWE M Yr V41 vIF — ' S o_w[[rr w.IrtYwn x.e=nlr'it .. EM -M Page 27 Page 245 A JL -I A. A 4L A nir IL 2;7—= I A sl- A L a AL A S& 9L I A t WA A 77 k T of A ff. dp op A auh-iFl mLWKLW sum,-WA�m Page 28 Item#17. 7-i 1 i - � r f t Al f# f, r r m i •f aD �' awam r+9mFru+sF.crxgr. Quartet Southeast: QUARTf7$0�]T Wr 5LJ HINVISION PR9�1MiNARY PLAT x{wCer ht�.WGYNMFra Ix.A poML16rr of nk Yxnn Lj2Or NElrnkhmIsfift k • 4k6a PMTIEN OF THE WEST W Ex THE 93UNWESl 1A OF UCrK43t 1U5N45NIF1 II OWN.IVIR I MTSF,On O F 6ILRI UM,ADA WIJNIV.VANa U UTF T 97PLl A6=51.FO.AP I Paz. Page 29 Page 247 Item#17. 1 rSii I gr�anis<zmruTsu�un�w — MS dr im � --r " Y burner iOu�nEul wern+Ho� Page 30 Page 248 Phasing Plan: L T$ a . t 2. 41 M7 -T7 �[ IL t- � . } I, AN- JL gL S JL .,.A IL T-- \ \ - � \ � �� , ����/� �22 �` Z � \ /\ . Ak. mj� f JL jt IL IL ] .� \ � �. - L 7 Page 31 Item#17. D. Landscape Plan(date: 1/30/2020) Quartet Northeast: .S MPG � I .� �11#9RIILLLL 6111 i I 4 m 41 ,m-- MIA .. _ elm :- dRRRfS�F R Ll Page 32 Page 250 Item#17. 1 1 1 1 � O -_. r•-. � f IJ O 1 _ I ' i m:' L y. 1 .... ...... 1 _ ]u WR 1 NGF nimi k.81.M KA LhhG5G5fi E!- — Quartet Southeast: IIIIL *3" � — � I Bkl(;HTON Page 33 Page 251 Item#17. --..... '�' F� n�[• r.�a a�aR'y� f f - - e•_�.srr��.--- _.. �'�.ruariera.acx•: 'T�3�'���.''"�'�-� ixhd nP sff ,W i' ae mod'= •+� ^• • RUu7F?SJLRUEffT�rOLI 0 �•• 4 aaLtia � Lr :... r...:. ...... -7:71..� - = -- - - i .tea aurcntriouTKU&wvwlon IAlI�BC/if=Lail ��...,��11177i" Page 34 Page 252 Item#17. E. Qualified Open Space Exhibit(dated: 6/11/2020) Quartet Northeast: ` a11AiaTfT NORTkEAS7 SU9011+i51Ge ov€n SPACE EXMIW VA OLVAM _ . tea.. .. _.a__ _. _.. •_n 1417 Quartet Southeast: "RTETSO MEAST SUODI1RS10r1 OPEN SPACE MOM AU 1- uwrn x+�xa z Page 35 Page 253 Qt� rF.'��u���vl�loar w N* MEN + r FVMdDN �r _ rmF.arrr.maps AL . . B I ifTUN �' - ti`_ 13 K IGC'TO-N iu.tiarErsueatvrstoM -. T T' TT7ICAL2LSVA77CM-;i � —RAIMOV- 1 nib f RICiHTON B1 1GHTON Item#17. IX. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. A Development Agreement(DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s)at the time of annexation ordinance adoption,and the developer. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The Record of Survey depicted in Section A1111.A shall be ftpffoved by Ada County and meor-ded pr4or to City Couneil appFoval of the Annexation Or-dinanee and Development Agreement for- The DA shall,at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat, phasing plan, landscape plan, qualified open space exhibit and conceptual building elevations included in Section VIII and the provisions contained herein. b. The existing homes that are to be retained on lots in the proposed subdivision are required to disconnect from private systems and hook up to City water and sewer service within 60 days of such services becoming available as set forth in MCC 9-1-4 and 9-4-8 respectively. Existing wells may be used for irrigation purposes only. c. The existing homes to be retained on lots in the proposed subdivision will be assigned new addresses with subdivision of the property. d. The Five Mile Creek shall be protected during construction. e. No residential uses shall be developed on the non-residential/commercial C-G zoned lot on the east side of the collector street(depicted as Lot 1,Block 14 on the preliminary lat ,including but not limited to, a multi-family development, a vertically integrated residential project, and/or a nursing/residential care facility unless a subsequent Noise and Odor Study conducted by the City determines residential uses are appropriate in that area. f. The Developer shall coordinate with the City Park's Department prior to development of the non-residential/commercial lot(depicted as Lot 1,Block 14 on the preliminary platl on the east side of the collector street(N.Joy Way) to determine if a City Park is needed in this area as designated on the Comprehensive Plan. The Development Agreement shall be amended to include a conceptual development plan for that area prior to any development occurring on that lot. g. The rear and/or side of structures on lots that face N. Black Cat Rd., an arterial street, and San Remo St./N.Joy Way, a collector street, shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays, banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. h. Quartet Northeast and Southeast subdivisions shall develop and be phased as one project and shall be included in the same Homeowner's Association; all common open space and site amenities between the two subdivisions shall be shared. i. An odor study shall be conducted by the City prior to development of Phase 3 to determine if residential uses are appropriate in the MU-NR designated area: if determined to not be appropriate. Page 37 Page 255 Item#17. a modification to the Development Agreement shall be required to amend the development plan for that area. 2. The final plat(s) submitted for this development shall incorporate the following: a. Include a note stating direct lot access via N. Black Cat Rd. and San Remo St./N. Joy Way is prohibited. 3. The landscape plan submitted with the final plat application shall be revised as follows: a. Add pedestrian pathways from the internal sidewalks along Miramente Ct. and Miramente Dr. through adjacent common areas to the multi-use pathway along the Five Mile Creek;provide breaks in the fence where necessary to provide a connection. Also provide micro-path connections through Lot 10,Block 4 and Lot 7,Block 3 for pedestrian interconnectivity within the subdivision. b. Landscaping shall be depicted on either side of all pathways as set forth in UDC 11-3B-12C. Calculations shall be included for the linear feet of pathway and the required vs.provided number of trees in the Calculations table. c. If any existing trees are proposed to be removed from the site,the Applicant shall schedule an inspection with the City Arborist,Matt Perkins,prior to removal of any such trees to determine mitigation requirements in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-1OC.5. Mitigation information shall be included in the calculations table on the plan if applicable. d. If the unimproved right-of-way is 10 feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line,the Developer is required to maintain a 10 foot compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of ACHD and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.5. A license agreement for improvements within the right-of-way is required between the property owner and ACHD. e. Depict fencing adjacent to the Creason Lateral as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6C.3 in order to preserve public safety unless the waterway is proposed to be improved as part of the development to be a water amenity. In such case, documentation shall be submitted as set forth in UDC 11-1A-1 and 11-3A-6C.2 for approval by the Director. £ The location of site amenities shall be depicted on the plan; a detail shall be submitted for the children's play equipment. g. Depict landscaping in Lot 34,Block 4 in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3E. h. Depict fencing on Lot 34,Block 4 where the Creason Lateral is located per the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7A.7 to provide more visibility of the common area. i. Depict a 6-foot tall open vision fence having an 11-gauge, 2 inch mesh or other construction equivalent in ability to deter access to the Creason Lateral on Lot 34,Block 4 in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6C.3 unless the waterway is proposed to be improved as part of the development to be a water amenity. In such case,construction drawings and relevant calculations prepared by a qualified licensed professional registered in the State of Idaho shall be submitted to both the Director and the authorized representative of the water facility for approval. 4. Future development shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-6 and 11-2B-3 for the R-8 and C-G zoning districts respectively. 5. The bridge across the Five Mile Creek and the gravel fire access road from Black Cat Rd. in the location where the collector street is proposed shall be constructed for emergency access for any development over 30 homes/lots as approved by the Fire Department. 6. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 Page 38 Page 256 Item#17. based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 7. An exhibit shall be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks, fencing,building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via common driveways; if a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street,the driveway shall be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D. 8. Address signage shall be provided at the public street for homes accessed via common driveways for emergency wayfinding purposes. 9. A perpetual ingress/egress easement shall be filed with the Ada County Recorder for the common driveways,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D.8. A copy of said easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division with the final plat for City Engineer signature; or,this information may be included on the face of the plat. 10. A Type III barricade shall be placed at the intersection of N. Joy Way and Grand Rapids Dr. to prevent access until the street is extended in the future;the construction drawings shall be revised to include this change. As an alternative to a barricade, a Fire Dept. approved turnaround could be provided at the end of the collector street instead. 11. All existing structures that don't comply with the setback standards listed in UDC 11-2A-6 shall be removed from the site prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer for the phase in which they are located. 12. A 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division for the 10-foot wide multi-use pathways proposed within the site that are not located within right-of-way,prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 13. The existing access via Black Cat Rd. for the home proposed to remain on Lot 2,Block 1, Quartet Northeast subdivision shall be removed. 14. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted and approved prior to submittal of any building permit applications for the swimming pool facility in the residential portion of the development; and for all non-residential/commercial uses. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 Applicant to ensure that the depths of the sanitary sewer allows for service of the property to the SE of Quartet Northeast per the Meridian Wastewater Master Plan. 1.2 The water main in N Joy Way(furthest east road) should be a 12-inch. Also,the water main in N Joy Way will need to continue south through Quartet Southeast to provide a second connection out to Black Cat Road with the fit second phase of the development. 1.3 Consider eliminating the short dead-end water main in the cul-de-sac off of Exeter Avenue and Capriana Drive, instead install three services to the three cul-de-sac homes off the mainline in Capriana Drive. 1.4 From the preliminary investigation of groundwater elevation provided in the application,it appears that shallow groundwater may be a factor with the development of this subdivision. Additional monitoring and analysis shall be required to ensure that homes constructed within this development do not encounter groundwater within their crawl spaces. Updated data and recommendations from a geotechnical professional shall be required with the submittal of construction design drawings. Page 39 Page 257 Item#17. 1.5 A portion of this project lies within the Meridian Floodplain Overlay District. Prior to any development occurring in the Overlay District,a floodplain permit application,including hydraulic and hydrologic analysis is required to be completed and submitted to the City and approved by the Floodplain Administrator per MCC 10-6. 2. General Conditions of Approval—Quartet Northeast& Quartet Southeast 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet,if cover from top of pipe to sub- grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x 11"map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B)for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals,or drains, exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)898- 5500 for inspections of disconnection of services.Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at(208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. Page 40 Page 258 Item#17. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C- 3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting.A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public works.aspx?id=272. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must Page 41 Page 259 Item#17. file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT Northeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=187210&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity Southeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.or lWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=187211&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCioy Phasing: https:llweblink.meridianciU.oLglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=187133&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiU D. POLICE DEPARTMENT https:llweblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=187674&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity E. PARK'S DEPARTMENT Northeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.or lWebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=190216&dbid=0&repo=Meridian City Southeast: No comments were submitted F. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO(COMPASS) Northeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=188456&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity Southeast: https:llweblink.meridianciN.orgj ebLink/DocView.aspx?id=188457&dbid=0&repo=MeridianQU G. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.asp x?id=1891 73&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity H. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT(NMID) Northeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=188676&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit y Southeast: https:llweblink.meridianciU.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=188675&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCioX I. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT Northeast: https:llweblink.meridianciU.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=187426&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCioy Southeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.oLvlWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=187427&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity J. IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT(ITD) Northeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.org WWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=189529&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity Southeast: Page 42 Page 260 Item#17. https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=189614&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity K. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) Northeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.org/WebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=187575&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiu Southeast: https:llweblink.meridianciU.oLvlWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=187574&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiu X. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-513-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment to R-8& C-G and proposed development is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is appropriate with an extension of the MDR FL UM land use designation to the collector street as proposed if the Applicant complies with the provisions in Section IX. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the proposed single-family detached homes will contribute to the range of housing opportunities in the City. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment will not result in an adverse impact on the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The City Council finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City if the property is developed in accord with the provisions in Section IX. B. Preliminary Plat Findings: In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; The City Councilfinds that theproposedplat, with the Commission's recommendations, is in substantial compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density, transportation, and pedestrian connectivity. (Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies in, Section V of this report for more information) Page 43 Page 261 Item#17. 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds that public services will be provided to the subject property with development. (See Exhibit B of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers) 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the development at their own cost, the City Council finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development based upon comments from the public service providers (i.e., Police, Fire, ACHD, etc). (See Section Mfor more information) 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health,safety or general welfare; and, The City Council is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated with the platting of this property. ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The City Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that exist on this site that require preserving. Page 44 Page 262 Item#18. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Development Agreement Between the City of Meridian and Compass Public Charter School (Owner) and Bouma USA Management, LLC (Developer) for COMPASS Charter School East Expansion (H-2020-0042) Page 263 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-117678 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=31 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 09/10/2020 10:44 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES: 1. City of Meridian 2, Bouma USA Management, LLC, Developer 3. Compass Public Charter School, Owner THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT(this Agreement), is made and entered into this -%,d` day of d S"f' 2020, by and between City of Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State o'Idaho, hereafter called CITY whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642 and Compass Public Charter School, whose address is 4540 E. Franklin Road, ID 83642, hereinafter called OWNERS and Bouma USA Management, LLC, whose address is 3033 Orchard Vista Dr., Suite 309, Grand Rapids, Michigan 48546 hereinafter called DEVELOPER. 1. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, Owners are the sole owner, in law and/or equity,of certain tract of land in the County of Ada,State of Idaho,described in Exhibit"A",which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, herein after referred to as the Property; and 1.2 WHEREAS, Idaho Code§67-6511 A provides that cities may,by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of zoning that the Owners and/or Developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject Property; and 1.3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Section 11-513-3 of the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re-zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS,Owners and/or Developer have submitted an application for the annexation and zoning of 5.15 acres of land, from the RUT to the R-15 (Medium Density Residential) zoning district and for modification to an existing Development Agreement (#2018-079763) to incorporate the land described in the attached Exhibit"A" into one Agreement, under the Unified Development Code, which generally describes how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.5 WHEREAS, Owners and/or Developer made representations at the public hearings both before the Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission and before DLVELOPMEN-I'AG12EE\,IEN'r -COMPASS C;I IARTER SCHOOL EAST EXPANSION(H-2020-0042) PAGE I OF 9 Page 264 Item#18. the Meridian City Council,as to haw the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.6 WHEREAS,the record of the proceedings for the requested annexation and zoning of the Property held before the Planning&Zoning Commission; and subsequently before the City Council, includes responses of government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning Jurisdiction, and includes further testimony and comment; and 1.7 WHEREAS,on the 7"'day of July,2020,the Meridian City Council approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order ("Findings"),which have been incorporated into this Agreement and attached as Exhibit"B'; and 1.8 WHEREAS,the Findings require the Owners and/or Developer to enter into a Development Agreement before the City Council takes final action on final plat; and 1.9 WHEREAS,Owners and/or Developer deems it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and request; and 1.10 WHEREAS, City requires the Owner and/or Developer to enter into a development agreement for the purpose of ensuring that the Property is developed and the subsequent use of the Property is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement,herein being established as a result of evidence received by the City in the proceedings for zoning designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure zoning designation are in accordance with the amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian on October 11, 2016, Resolution No. 16-1173, and the UDC, Title 11. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in fiill. 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement the following words,terms,and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for,unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 CITY: means and refers to the City of Meridian,a party to this Agreement, which is a municipal Corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. DEver.or M r.r AGREEMENT—COMPASS CHARTER SCHOOL Ens'r E.xpiv sroN(11-2020-0042) PAGE-2 of 9 Page 265 Item#18. 3.2 OWNERS: means and refers to Compass Public Charter School whose address is 4667 W. Aviator Street, Meridian, ID 83642, the patties that own said Property and shall include any subsequent owner(s) of the Property. 3.3 DEVELOPER: means and refers to Bouma USA Management, LLC, whose address is 3033 Orchard Vista Dr., Suite 309,Grand Rapids,Michigan 48546, the party that is developing said Property and shall include any subsequent developer(s) of the Property. 3.4 PROPERTY: means and refers to that certain parcel(s)of Property located in the County of Ada,City of Meridian as described in Exhibit"A"describing the parcel to be bound by this Development Agreement and attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall vest the right to develop the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed under the UDC. 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1. Owners and/or Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. Development of this site shall substantially comply with the design standards listed in UDC 1 I-3A-19;the guidelines contained in the Architectural Standards Manual,the site plan and building elevations in Exhibit A of the Staff Report attached to Exhibit "B", T--- Findings of Fact Conclusions of Law. b. All future development of the subject property shall comply with City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of development. c. Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Administrative Design Review applications are required to be submitted to the Planning Division for approval of all future buildings/uses on the site, prior to applying for a building permit. d. The applicant shall comply with the Education Institution standards set forth in UDC 11- AIAVIV4I 4-3-14. e. All development within the 75-foot wide Williams pipeline easement shall adhere to the most current standards contained in the Williams Gas Pipeline Developers' Handbook. f. Access to the future collector roadway shall be approved as shown on the concept plan in Exhibit AA of the Staff Report attached to Exhibit`B",Findings of Fact Conclusions of Law. All future access point to the collector roadway shall be governed by UDC I I-3A-3. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—COMPASS CHARTER SCIiOOL EAST EXPANSION(H-2020-0042) PAGE 3 OF 9 Page 266 Item#18. g. The applicant shall generally comply with the submitted concept plan and landscape plan attached as Exhibit VII. C and D of the Staff Report attached to Exhibit"B",Findings of Fact Conclusions of Law. Any future development on the southern portion of this property shall require an amendment to this DA and be subdivided in accord with UDC 11-613. h. If the southern parcel is developed, cross-access agreements will be required to the adjacent parcels to the east and west in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A (parcel numbers S 1210336377 & S 1210336450). i. Upon Council approval,the landscape buffer along the eastern property boundary abutting the proposed parking lot shall have a width of no less than 15-feet from the property line and be landscaped in accordance with UDC 11-313-9. 6. COMPLIANCE PERIOD This Agreement must be fully executed within six (6) months after the date of the Findings for the annexation and zoning or it is null and void, 7. DEFAULT/CONSENT TO DE-ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: 7.1 Acts of Default. Either party's failure to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement shall constitute default under this Agreement. 7.2 Notice and Cure Period. In the event of Owners and/or Developer's default of this Agreement,Owners and/or Developer shall have thirty(30)days from receipt of written notice from City to initiate commencement of action to correct the breach and cure the default,which action must be prosecuted with diligence and completed within one hundred eighty, (180) days; provided, however, that in the case of any such default that cannot with diligence be cured within such one hundred eighty(ISO)day period,then the time allowed to Cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. T3 Remedies. In the event of default by Owners and/or Developer that is not cured after notice as described in Section 7.2,Owners and/or Developer shall be deemed to have consented to modification of this Agreement and de- annexation and reversal of the zoning designations described herein, solely against the offending portion of Property and upon City's compliance with all applicable laws,ordinances and rules, including any applicable provisions of Idaho Code §§ 67-6509 and 67-65I 1. Owners and/or Developer reserve all rights to contest whether a default has occurred. This Agreement shall be enforceable in the Fourth Judicial District Court in Ada County by either City or Owners and/or Developer, or by any successor or successors in title or by the assigns of the parties hereto. Enforcement may be sought by an appropriate action at law or in equity to secure the specific performance of the covenants, agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—COMPASS CHARTER SCHOOL EAST E\PANSION(H-2020-0042) PAGE 4 OF 9 Page 267 Item#18. 7.4 Delay. in the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either Owners and/or Developer or City is delayed for causes that are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience,strikes or similar causes,the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. 7.5 Waiver. A waiver by City of any default by Owners and/or Developer of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the default and defaults waived and shall neither bar any other rights or remedies of City nor apply to any subsequent default of any such or other covenants and conditions. 8. INSPECTION: Owners and/or Developer shall, immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the Property as required by this Agreement or by City ordinance or policy, notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other ordinances of the City that apply to said Property. 9. REQUIRENIENT FOR RECORDATION: City shall record this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits,and submit proof of such recording to Owners and/or Developer,prior to the third reading of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the re-zoning of the Property by the City Council. If for any reason after such recordation, the City Council fails to adopt the ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property contemplated hereby,the City shall execute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement. 10. ZONING: City shall,following recordation of the duly approved Agreement,enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the Property as specified herein. 11, SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The City may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit,cash deposits,certified check or negotiable bonds,as allowed under the UDC,to insure the installation of required improvements,which the Owners and/or Developer agree to provide, if required by the City. 12, CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed,completed,and accepted by the City, or sufficient surety of performance is provided by Owners and/or Developer to the City in accordance with Paragraph 1 I above. 13. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That Owners and/or Developer agree to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian unless otherwise provided by this Agreement. 14, NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—COMPASS CHARTER SCHOOL EAST EXPANSION(H-2020-0042) PAGE 5 OF 9 Page 268 Item#18. CITY: with copy to: City Clerk City Attorney City of Meridian City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 OWNERS: Compass Public Charter School 4667 W. Aviator Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 DEVELOPER: Bouma USA Management, LLC 3033 Orchard Vista.Dr., Suite 309 Grand Rapids, Michigan 48546 14.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 15. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the panties hereto concerning this Agreement,the prevailing party shall be entitled,in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default,termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 16. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term,condition and provision hereof,and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 17. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including City's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the Owners and/or Developer,each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property,or portions thereof,except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. City agrees,upon written request of Owners and/or Developer,to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if City,in its sole and reasonable discretion,had deterimined that Owners and/or Developer have fully performed their obligations under this Agreement. I8. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. DEVEI..OPM}.iN,r AGREE-MENT—COMPASS CHARTER SCHOOL EAST EXPANSION(H-2020-0042) PAGE 6 OF 9 Page 269 Item#18. 19. DUTY TO ACT REASONABLY: Unless otherwise expressly provided,each party shall act reasonably in giving any consent,approval,or taking any other action under this Agreement. 20. COOPERATION OF THE PARTIES: In the event of any legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third party (including a governmental entity or official) challenging the validity of any provision in this Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate in defending such action or proceeding. 21. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements,condition and understandings between Owners and/or Developer and City relative to the subject matter hereof,and there are no promises,agreements,conditions or understanding,either oral or\written, express or implied, between Owners and/or Developer and City, other-than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns,and pursuant,with respect to City,to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. 21.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing re-zoning of the subject Property herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 22. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT:This Agreement shall be effective oil the date the Meridian City Council shall adopt the amendment to the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property and execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. [end of text; signatures, acknowledgennents, and Exhibits A and B follow] DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—COMPASS CHARTER SCHOOL EAST L"XPANSION(H-2020-0042) PAGE 7 OF 9 Page 270 Item#18. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. OWNERS: Compass Public Charter School By: J- / crwYtn�i ti Its: yt DEVELOPER: Bouma USA Management, LLC By: Its: 6pgr ,?:, 0 '2ir.oi' CITY OF MERIDIAN ATTEST: By: Mayor Robert E. Simison Chris Johnson, City Clerk DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—COMPASS CHARTER SCHOOL EAST EXPANSION(H-2020-0042) PAGIi 8 OF 9 Page 2 Item#18. STATE-OF PA 1 ) ss: County of Vcr-i ) On this 2i�, day of 2020,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared +J0 kno%�ii or identified to me to be the (,pp of Bot>ma USA Alanagement,LLC and the person��ho signed above and acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL) ATTI LYNN `BOUMA Notary Public for ��t�\�_ a iyT NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF MICHIGAN Residing at: COUNTY OF KENT My Commission Expires: t 12-co I ZZ My Commission Expires Jan.26,2022 Acting in the County of b r-,r-- -- STATE OF IDAI IO ) ss: County of Ada i On this iii day of i\ 2020, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared U-- ,, d' .known or identified to me to be the J6,ca,-A C.4� �,✓ of Compass Charter School and acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of said school. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above wt•itten. itlf ii8$gg� •. �g49 dip � (SEAL) ���`°„ Cll�d© 6'P�Or � �Qt�'r'� 0 00ci���� Notary Public for Id ho / Residing at: 114,11, f c',17g a $ 0 x My Commission Expires: t I,Z c zy ® � 0 + 0 10 00 10 STATE OF IDAI IO rr�S'e�eceit♦°�t County of Ada j On this 8th day of September 2020. before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Robert E.Simison and Chris Johnson,known or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk,respectively,of the City of N-lei•idian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notar•,Public for Id ho Residing at: Meridian, Idaho Commission expires: 3-28-2022 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—COMPASS CHARTER SCI IOOI,FAST EXPANSION(1-I-2020-0042) PAGE 9 OF 9 Item#18. FOX JHMH LAND SURVEYS engineenng REVISED EXHIBIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A parcel of land within the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows, COMMENCING at the Corner of Sections 9, 10, 15 & 16 at the intersection of W. Franklin Road and N. Black Cat Road, monumented by a found Aluminum Cap as described in Corner Record Instrument No. 2018-016068, from which the Quarter Corner to Sections 10 and 15 bears South 89°15'37" East, 2640.62 feet, monumented by a found Aluminum Cap as described in Corner Record Instrument No. 2018-016067, thence along the Section line, South 89°15'37" East, 908.47 feet; thence North 00°35'11" East, 35.88 feet to the Northerly Right-of-Way for West Franklin Road, monumented by a found 5/8- inch rebar with cap stamped "PLS 7612" and the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing North 00°35'11" East, 1051.99 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar with cap stamped "FLS 7612"; Thence North 89°15'44" West, 205.90 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar with cap stamped "PLS 12464"; Thence South 00°36'41" West, 55.00 feet to the Southerly Right-of-Way for West Aviator Street monumented by a found 5/8-inch rebar with cap stamped "PLS 12464"; Then continuing along said Right-of-Way the following three (3) courses and distances: Thence North 89°15'44" West, 451.45 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar with cap stamped "PLS 12464"; Thence South 85°01'37" West, 50.25 feet to a found Copper Cap stamped "PLS 7612"; Thence North 89°15'44" West, 139.50 feet to the Easterly Right-of-Way for North Black Cat Road, monumented by a found 5/8-inch rebar with cap stamped "PLS 12464"; Thence along said Right-of-Way, South 34°58'48" West, 22.08 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar with cap stamped "PLS 12464"; Thence continuing along said Right-of-Way, South 00°38'57" West, 35.60 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar with cap stamped "PLS 12464"; 680 S. Progress Ave., Suite #213 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 • Tel: 208-342-7957 • Web: hmh-Ilc.com page 273 Equal Opportunity Employer Item#18. Thence South 89°15'44" East, 151.87 feet to a found 1/2-inch rebar with no cap; Thence South 00°38'26" West, 116.50 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar with cap stamped "PLS 12464"; Thence South 89'15'44" East, 90.18 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar with cap stamped "PLS 12464"; Thence South 00°34'50" West, 810.74 feet to the Northerly Right-of-Way for West Franklin Road, monumented by to a found 5/8-inch rebar with cap stamped "PLS 12464"; Thence along said Right-of-Way, South 89°15'37" East, 94.13 feet to a found Copper Cap stamped "PLS 7612"; Thence continuing along said Right-of-Way, South 82°16'35" East, 8.17 feet to a found Aluminum Cap stamped "PLS 117778"; Thence North 00°36'41" East, 411.41 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar with cap stamped "PLS 12464"; Thence South 89°09'23" East, 102.95 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar with cap stamped "PLS 12464"; Thence North 00°36'41" East, 155.88 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar with cap stamped "PLS 12464"; Thence South 89°15'44" East, 204.84 feet to a 1-foot Witness Corner monumented by a found 5/8-inch rebar with cap stamped "PLS 12464"; Thence continuing South 89°15'44" East, 1.00 feet; Thence South 00°36'41" West, 576.98 feet to the North Right-of-Way for West Franklin Road monumented by a found 5/8-inch rebar with cap stamped "PLS 12464"; Thence along said Right-of-Way, South 89°15'37" East, 206.36 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 11.189 acres, more or less. END OF DESCRIPTION Prepared by: Ronald M. Hodge, PLS Survey Department Mang er G\ rER G 0. 85 5 �, o a •oz•Zv� 0 f RMHJR development agreement legal description revised Pag Page 274 Item#18. REVISED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 77 EXHIBIT o 100 Zoo SCALE: 1"=200' R/W R/W O O Of I � I O I � O O IU I� U a Flt� /k zOf � I , I 9 10 O O O O F — — — — — — — — — 10 16 15 W. FRANKLIN ROAD Basis of Bearings 15 R/W R/W — N LEGEND �, \S BOUNDARY o — — — SECTION a 857 0 — — — RECORD BOUNDARY o R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY ba•p2'2 0 ® o N O SURVEY MONUMENTS �0 9TF OF FOX LAND SURV S20009-04 Sketch.dwg (208) 342-7957 Page 275 EXHIBIT B Item#18. CITY OF MERIDIAN T T FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�((IEN �IAl V�• AND DECISION&ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Annexation and Zoning,by Bouma USA. Case No(s).H-2020-0042 For the City Council Hearing Date of: June 16, 2020 (Findings on July 7, 2020) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 16, 2020, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 16, 2020,incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 16,2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 16,2020,incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title I I Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § I I-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 16,2020, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(COMPASS Charter School East Expansion—FILE#H-2020-0042) - I - Page 276 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 324 of 814 Item#18. reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Annexation and Zoning is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of June 16,2020, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC I I- 6B-7C). Notice of Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit,when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time,the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting,the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two(2)year period. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-513-6.G.1,the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one(1)two (2)year period. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11(UDC 11-513-6F). FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(COMPASS Charter School East Expansion—FILE#H-2020-0042) -2- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 325 of 814 Item#18. Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28)days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of June 16,2020 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(COMPASS Charter School East Expansion—FILE#H-2020-0042) -3- Page 278 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 326 of 814 Item#18. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 7th day of July 2020. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED YEA COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED YEA COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED ----- COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED YEA COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED YEA COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED YEA MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 7-7-2020 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(COMPASS Charter School East Expansion—FILE#H-2020-0042) -4- Page 279 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 327 of 814 Item#18. Exhibit A STAFF REPORT C> E IDIAN - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A H O HEARING 6/16/2020 Legend DATE: - Project Location TO: Mayor&City Council 01FROM: Joseph Dodson,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 ----`- °' -' - - , 4 Bruce Freckleton,Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2020-0042 COMPASS Charter School East Expansion LOCATION: 4540 W. Franklin Rd., in the SW '/4 of the SW '/4 of Section 10,Township 3N., ------ -- Range 1 W. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION • Annexation of 5.15 acres of land from RUT in Ada County to the R-15 zoning district to develop the property with additional parking and recreational fields for an existing Education Institution. • Modification to the existing Development Agreement(Inst. #2018-079763)to incorporate the subject property and revise the concept plan based on the proposed expansion of the Education Institution. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 5.15 acres Future Land Use Designation Medium-High Density Residential Existing Land Use Rural residential/agricultural(one single-family home) Proposed Land Use(s) Expansion of existing Education Institution Current Zoning RUT in Ada County Proposed Zoning R-15 Lots(#and type;bldg/common) 1 lot Amenities N/A Physical Features(waterways, None known hazards,flood plain,hillside) Neighborhood meeting date;#of February 10,2020; 9 attendees. attendees: Page 1 — Page 280 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 328 of 814 Item#18. B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) No • Requires ACHD No Commission Action (yes/no) Access(Arterial/Collectors/State Existing access to Franklin Rd.will be closed;Access to Hwy/Local)(Existing and Proposed) proposed parking area will be off of collector street extension, W.Aviator St. Stub Street/Interconnectivity/Cross There will pedestrian connection between the proposed Access parking area and the school directly to the west;no vehicular connection beyond access to W.Aviator St. See staff analysis below for further information. Existing Road Network W.Franklin Road is built to its ultimate configuration. 5- travel lanes,bike lanes,curb,gutter and detached sidewalk. Existing Arterial Sidewalks/ There is existing detached sidewalk but no landscape buffer Buffers from the existing residence to Franklin Rd.A landscape buffer is required and shown on the landscape plans. C. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Lz:Jm��� � �� Legend jIff 0 Legend i Project Location D2r1__-_, Project Location i � sdential MUTC. - Med`High Density Gene ral Residential - A- i Industrial, Mixed High Density � ._. Employmenf Residential i MU-Res .. Low Density-Employment MU-Corn , Zoning Map Planned Development Map �- Page 2 — Page 281 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 329 of 814 Item#18. Legend � � (� Legend - 0 Project Location \ Project Location R-1-1 L J City LimitsEH Rl Planned Parcels ----------- M-E C-G ----- R�1 ; Ml Ml R1� r LC2 L-77RUT Ml R-8 R-8 R-40' C-C , WE TN-C C-C _ III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Representative: Paul Bierlein,Bouma USA—445 Pettis, Suite 201,Ada, MI 49301 B. Owner/Developer: Stephen Janoushek—4540 W. Franklin Road,Meridian,ID 83642 C. Contact: Bouma USA—445 Pettis, Suite 201, Ada, MI 49301 IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper notification published 5/l/2020 5/29/2020 Radius notification mailed to properties within 300 feet 4/28/2020 5/26/2020 Public hearing notice sign posted 5/6/2020 6/4/2020 Nextdoor posting 4/28/2020 5/27/2020 V. STAFF ANALYSIS The land proposed to be annexed is designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (FLUM) as Medium High Density Residential(MHDR). This designation allows for a mix of dwelling types including townhouses, condominiums, and apartments. Residential gross densities should range from eight to twelve dwelling units per acre. These areas are relatively compact within the context of larger neighborhoods and are typically located around or near mixed use commercial or employment areas to provide convenient access to services and jobs for residents. Developments need to incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful Page 3 Page 282 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 330 of 814 Item#18. site design to ensure quality of place and should also incorporate connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways, attractive landscaping and a project identity. The Applicant is requesting annexation with a zoning designation of R-15,which is an allowed zoning district under the MHDR future land use designation. This development is not proposed as a residential project but instead an extension of the COMPASS Charter School, defined as an Education Institution in our Unified Development Code(UDC). An Education Institution is a principally permitted use in the R-15 zoning district. There are no buildings proposed with this annexation and zoning, only a proposed parking lot for additional parking and a sports field for the students. The parking lot and additional 88 spaces is a requirement for the recently approved classroom expansion at the existing school site directly to the west of the subject site. A condition of approval in the approved CZC and Design Review for that building expansion was related to this annexation and the proposed parking lot(A-2020-0008). A legal description for the annexation area is included in Section VILA of this staff report. Currently,the existing development agreement(DA)on site shows additional parking and a conceptual sports field on the parcel directly to the north of this site and across W.Aviator St. Since the original annexation and development of the COMPASS Charter School,the Applicant's desired location for the additional parking and sports field has changed. Citing potential safety issues of children and staff crossing W. Aviator and the costs of installing a signal from that northern parcel to the main school site,the Applicant has decided to move these development items to this subject site. Because this concept plan is not in line with the approved plan within the existing DA, a modification to that DA is required and any additional DA provisions are in Section VIII.A1 of this staff report. Staff believes that this new concept plan will offer better integration of the sports field into the existing school site and help eliminate the need of children to cross a street from the parking area to get to school. The proposed use of Education Institution requires a 25-foot land use buffer to residential uses, landscaped per the standards in UDC 11-313-9. The submitted landscape plan shows compliance with this requirement along its eastern boundary except for the area directly abutting the proposed parking lot. In order to fit the required number of spaces in this area,the dimensions of the parking area push into the 25-foot buffer. Because of this,the Applicant is requesting a modification to the buffer size by City Council, only for this area abutting the parking lot. Staff supports this request as the submitted landscape plan shows a landscape buffer of at least 15 feet with landscaping. If this were to be labeled as only a parking lot instead of an Education Institution,UDC standards would only require a 5-foot landscape buffer. The Applicant's landscape plan shows extensive landscaping and a 6-foot vinyl privacy fence along the entire eastern boundary of the site, including that area along the parking lot. Staff finds the proposed landscaping to be greater than or equal to the required 25-foot buffer. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the Applicant's request for annexation&zoning and a modification to their existing Development Agreement with the conditions of approval in Section VIII per the Findings in Section IX of this staff report. B. The Meridian Planning&Zonina Commission heard these items on May 21, 2020. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject Annexation and Zoning requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Paul Bierlein,Bouma USA—Applicant representative Page 4 Page 283 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 331 of 814 Item#18. b. In opposition:None c. Commenting: Paul Bierlein, Bouma USA d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Joseph Dodson f Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons;Andrea Pogue 2. Key issue(s) testimony a. None 3. Key issues)of discussion by Commission: a. Applicant's request to modify condition within the staff report regarding future access to Franklin Road if subject parcel were to ever be subdivided. b. Applicability of condition of approval to construct the full street section for the extension of W. Aviator St. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Revise condition of approval VIII.A.4 to reflect relaxed language regarding access to Franklin Road. 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. None C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on June 16,2020.At the public hearing.the Council moved to approve the subiect Annexation and Zoning request. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Bill Hadlock,Paradigm Design _project engineer;Norm Varin,COMPASS Board Chair b. In opposition: None c. Commenting: Bill Hadlock;Norm Varin. d. Written testimony:None e. Staff presenting application: Joseph Dodson f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Clarify plans for future development of the subject site. 4. City, Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. Strike out provision from existing DA.provision"e."regarding lot consolidation as it has been satisfied with previous applications. Page 5 Page 284 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 332 of 814 Item#18. VII. EXHIBITS A. Annexation&Zoning Legal Description and Exhibit FOX HMH LAND SURVEYS engineering EXHIBIT"A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION ANNEXATION PARCEL A parcel of land within the Southwest quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 10,Township 3 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,being all that property granted under PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES CORRECTION DEED Instrument No.108011815 together with existing Ada County Highway District Right-of-Way more particularly described as follows. COMMENCING at the Corner of Sections 9,10,15&16 the intersection of W.Franklin Road and N.Black Cat Road,from which the Quarter Corner to Sections 10 and 15 South 89°1s'37"East,2640.52 feet; Thence along said line Section line common to Sections 10 and 15,South 89'15'37"East,908.47 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence leaving said Section line,North 00'35'11"East,1087.87 feet to a found 1J2"Iron Pin with no cap,set plastic cap marked"FLSI PL57612"; Thence North 89'15'44"West,205.90 feet to a found 5/8"Iron Pin with plastic cap marked"FLSI PL512646"; Thence South 00'36'41"West,1087.85 feet to the Section line common to said Sections 10 and 15; Thence along said Section line,South 89°15'37"East,206.37 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 224,249 square feet or 5.148 acres,more or less. Refer to the accompanying"Exhibit B Annexation Sketch". Any modification of this description shall render it void. This description represents a surveyed boundary of the land described above by Fox Land Surveys,Inc.A Record of Survey will be recorded with Ada County upon completion_ END OF DESCRIPTION Prepared by: TimothyS.Fox,PLS Senior Project Manager R,.VROSECTS12020)S20009 PARADIGM\S20009-04 COMPASS CIrTR EASTIIMII DOCSMESCRIPTIONSLS20009-04 ANNE ng 680 5.Progress Ave.,Suite#213• Meridian,Idaho 83842•Tel:208-342-7957•Web:hmh-llc.com Equal Opportunity Employer — Page 6 Page 285 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 333 of 814 Item#18. EXHIBIT B ANNEXATION SKETCH 77 a 1 OR zoo SCALE: 1"=200' RM R N89'15'44"W — 205.90' 3 II Q � 00 o c I r o LLI U io in rn t o I � F Fc:) z 1 I + I I I I 1 I I I I I Point of Beginning 908.47' _ _ _ O — F 10 16-15 S89°15'37"E 2640.62' — W. FI2ATgT<_L TN ROAD Rvv Basis of Bearings_ 15 S89°15'37"E 206,37' LAty� LEGEND c3��N BOUNDARY jS7ER p G — — — SECTION o RECORD BOUNDARY a R= RIGHT-OF-WAY TI EIDETAIL y''Z 0 O N O SURVEY MONUMENTS ffF of A CALCULATION POINT ArNY F FOX LAND SURVEYS SK009-N Sketch.dwg (208)342-7957 Page 7 Page 286 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 334 of 814 Item#18. B. Existing Development Agreement Provisions 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1. Owners and/or Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. Development of this site shall substantially comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19,the guidelines contained in the Architectural Standards Manual,the site plan and building elevations in Exhibit A of the Staff Report attached to Exhibit"B", Findings of Fact Conclusions of Law. b. All future development of the subject property shall comply with City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of development. c. Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Administrative Design Review applications are required to be submitted to the Planning;Division for approval of all future buildings/uses on the site, prior to applying for a building permit. d. The applicant steal l comply with the Education Institution standards set forth in UDC 11- 3A-14. e. Prior to submitting an application for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance,the applicant shall finalize a property boundary adjustment in order to consolidate the parcels into one parcel. f. All development within the 75-foot wide Williams pipeline easement shall adhere to the most current standards contained in the Williams Gas Pipeline Developers' Handbook. g. Access to the future collector roadway shall be approved as shown on the concept plan in Exhibit A.4. All future access point to the collector roadway shall be governed by UDC 11-3A-3. — Page 8 — Page 287 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 335 of 814 Item#18. C. Concept Plan to replace existing(Development Agreement Modification) II IS b I A aA =� alll A io s m nF r , I I _ J 10 i --- _ j t -I rF �M t a E� o a 15 �f COry rRu [14CO MPASS EASTPARCEL Bou� EP,o 0 m USA Page 9 — Page 288 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 336 of 814 Item#18. D. Landscape Plans zo a 5 N ' a IF- 2E cn me aa� IIIILIf. � m Q 9 2 m N ,............ R' ..... F i - I :............................. i r�u u,uoscn.nuunnnnaemRaiaenrsms unwRran = g_ F a_mV -OFFS�P[IIt�FO� FRnnnIMPtKo —_ K n� z c a a� x vm AO oA lsu on mp n,n„ 3G) M 1 - 1 £ m m Page 10 Page 289 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 337 of 814 Item#18. E. Applicant Narrative Compass Charter School East Parcel-Project Narrative Compass Public Charter School is an established K-12 charter school in the City of Meridian. Compass began operating within the City of Meridian in 2005. Compass's initial facility, which currently houses their elementary students, is located on Cherry Lane between Ten Mile and Lander. In August of 2019, Compass moved the secondary(6-12)students to the current school building on the Black Cat Campus. The ownership contact for the property is: Compass Public Charter School Inc. 4667 W.Aviator Street Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: (208)888-5847 Contact: Melly Trudeau Compass Charter Schools is seeking annexation of property located near the intersection of North Black Cat Road and Aviation Street in the City of Meridian with a proposed zoning of R-15. The property consists of a single parcel which is located within the ADA County jurisdictional boundary and is contiguous to the City limits. This property will have an 8-inch water line within Aviator Street which will be extended across this parcel's northern frontage. An existing 12-inch water main and a 36-inch sewer line are in Franklin Road along the property frontage. In March 2020, Compass Public Charter School began constructing their next phase to house their elementary school and combine their campuses.The proposed expansion will build out the overall school site,as originally planned.At the time the original 68,134 sf building was approved, 167 parking spaces were provided, 30 more than what was required by the ordinance in place at the time (1 space per 500 square feet of gross floor area).With the elementary school addition, the square footage of the building will total 101,377 sf,requiring 253 parking spaces(1 space per 400 square feet of gross floor area),which would require the addition of 86 spaces to the campus. The construction of the parking on this project will replace the Alternative of Compliance requirements granted as part of the Compass Expansion project(A-2020-0008). The original master plan which was included in the Development Agreement intended to provide additional parking on the property the school owns on the north side of Aviator Street.There were concerns with pedestrians crossing a public street (Aviator) to access the school site. This concern grows as development continues in the area and as Aviator gets extended to the east. Summary of Applications/Rectuests The Compass Charter School East Parcel site plan design will provide 88 parking spaces and future play fields on 5.148 acres.The applicant is requesting the following approvals- • Annexation/Zoning • Development Agreement Modification to reflect relocating the additional parking from the north parcel to this east parcel. • Request for a Council waiver to reduce the landscape buffer along east property line A pre-application meeting was held with the City of Meridian Planning and Development staff on February 6, 2020. A neighborhood meeting was held on March 10, 2020 at Compass Public Page 11 Page 290 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 338 of 814 Item#18. Charter School,4667 VV.Aviator Street, Meridian, ID 83642. There was no opposition from the neighbors who attended. Annexation Compass Charter School is requesting the following parcel identified below be annexed into the City of Meridian. PROPERTY FOR ANNEXATION APPLICATION Parcel Address Current Zone Proposed Zone S1210336403 4540 W. Franklin Road RUT R-15 Ada County Assessor .� Legend - nsnnca,..ic ae,d.tamaa-earo I _ arks 'I are u '� ❑ 1 MUM. l `g ❑ sow. 4 0.14 Mlles Yap Scale: 7,7MAO ]1Ptlk029 Development Agreement Modification As there has been a change in the Master Concept Plan to relocate the parking, it is necessary to revise the Development Agreement approved at City Council on August 16,2018,recorded at the Ada County Recorder's office on August 22, 2018 as Instrument No. 2018-079763. By developing this site immediately adjacentto their existing school,they can create a more cohesive campus-Accompanying this submittal is a revised Concept Plan that includes the existing school and proposed improvements. Page 12 Page 291 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 339 of 814 Item#18. Request for a Council waiver The City of Meridian requires a 25-foot landscape buffer adjacent to residential uses according to their Unified Development Code. Given the narrowness of the parcel, the proposed parking lot geometry overlaps this landscape buffer.Compass Charter Schools is proposing to provide a 6- foot tall solid fence and landscaping along the east property which is an equal to or better than option. The ability to utilize a fencing selection rather than vegetation has been discussed with the property owner and they support this requested waiver. We are requesting a City Council waiver for a reduction landscape buffer along the proposed parking lot limits. Summary Wth continued growth of our campus,we look forward to working with the City of Meridian on this next step. We are respectfully asking for approval of this application for Annexation, and Development Agreement Modification and Council Waiver for Landscape Buffer Requirements. Page 13 Page 292 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 340 of 814 Item#18. VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. Within six(6)months of Council's approval of the Annexation Findings and prior to submittal of a certificate of zoning compliance(CZC),the owner shall sign and obtain Council approval of the amended development agreement that includes an updated development plan as shown in Section VII.0 and includes the following additional provisions: a. The applicant shall generally comply with the submitted concept plan and landscape plan attached as Exhibit VII. C and D. Any future development on the southern portion of this property shall require an amendment to this DA and be subdivided in accord with UDC 11-6B. b. If the southern parcel is developed, cross-access agreements will be required to the adjacent parcels to the east and west in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A(parcel numbers S1210336377 & S1210336450). c. Upon Council approval,the landscape buffer along the eastern property boundary abutting the proposed parking lot shall have a width of no less than 15-feet from the property line and be landscaped in accordance with UDC 11-313-9. d. This provision is being added to this addendum from DA Inst.#2018-079763 in order to be stricken as Mproved by City Council -Frio.to submitting an plieation f v ,.dust,, e t; order-t eenselidate too 2. The Applicant shall extend W.Aviator St. to the eastern boundary of the subject site as a complete 36-foot street section with vertical curb, gutter, and-75-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk on both sides of the roadway. 3. The Applicant shall construct the required offset temporary turnaround at the terminus of W. Aviator St. with a minimum turning radius of 45-feet. 4. The Applicant shall close the existing driveway connections to W.Franklin Rd. with landscaping as depicted on the concept plan with the expansion of the parking lot and play fields as depieted on the oa , ept plan; a;-eet lot, o s t W F-a*k is Rea ; and that future access from Franklin Road will be reviewed and approved with any future subdivision in accordance with UDC 11-3A-3. B. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) 04y a 19refiniinway,staff report has been subniioed to staff at this finie. https:llweblink.meridianciV.orglWebLink/DocView.aspx?id=188561&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC fty C. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH(CDH) https://weblink.meridianciU.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=18742 1&dbid=0&repo=Meridian C Ly D. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) https:llweblink.meridiancio!.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=187163&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianC iu Page 14 — Page 293 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 341 of 814 Item#18. E. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT(NMID) https:Ilweblink.meridianciU.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=187151&dbid=O&repo=Meridian C Lty IX. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; Council finds annexation of the subject site with an R-15 zoning designation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan MHDR FL UM designation for this property(see Section V for more information). 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; Council finds that a map amendment to the R-15 zoning district is consistent with the purpose statement for the residential districts in UDC 11-2A-1 and the proposed use of Public Education Institution will contribute to an array of uses in a growing area of the City, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; Council finds that the proposed zoning map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. Staff recommends the Commission and Council consider any oral or written testimony that may be provided when determining this finding. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and Council finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not result in any adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. Council finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City. Page 15 — Page 294 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 342 of 814 Item#19. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Development Agreement between the City of Meridian and Gem Prep: Meridian North, LLC (Owners) and Bouma, USA (Developer) for Gem Innovation School (H- 2020-0043) Page 295 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-117719 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=35 KRISTINA LOWRY 09/10/2020 10:52 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES: 1. City of Meridian 2. Bouma, USA, Developer 3. Gem Innovation School, Owner THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this Agreement), is made and entered into this-04. day of �"� , 2020, by and between City of Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, hereafter called CITY whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642 and Gem Prep: Meridian North, LLC whose address is PO Box 86, Deary, ID 83823, hereinafter called OWNERS and Bouma, USA whose address is 3033 Orchard Vista Dr. Suite 309 Grand Rapids MI 48546 hereinafter called DEVELOPER. 1. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, Owner is the sole owner,in law and/or equity,of certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, described in Exhibit"A",which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, herein after referred to as the Property; and 1.2 WHEREAS,Idaho Code § 67-6511 A provides that cities may,by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of zoning that the Owners and/or Developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject Property; and 1.3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Section 11-513-3 of the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re-zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS,Owners and/or Developer have submitted an application for the annexation and zoning of 8 acres of land,from the RUT to the R-15 (Medium Density Residential) zoning district for the property listed in the attached Exhibit"A", under the Unified Development Code,which generally describes how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made;and 1.5 WHEREAS, Owners and/or Developer made representations at the public hearings both before the Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission and before the Meridian City Council,as to how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—GEM INNOVATION SCHOOLS(H-2020-0043) PAGE I OF 9 Item#19. 1.6 WHEREAS, the record of the proceedings for the requested annexation and zoning of the Property held before the Planning & Zoning Commission, and subsequently before the City Council, includes responses of government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction, and includes further testimony and comment; and 1.7 WHEREAS, on the 21"' day of July, 2020, the Meridian City Council approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order ("Findings"), which have been incorporated into this Agreement and attached as Exhibit "B"; and 1.8 WHEREAS,the Findings require the Owners and/or Developer to enter into a Development Agreement before the City Council takes final action on final plat; and 1.9 WHEREAS,Owners and/or Developer deems it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and request; and 1.10 WHEREAS, City requires the Owner and/or Developer to enter into a development agreement for the purpose of ensuring that the Property is developed and the subsequent use of the Property is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement,herein being established as a result of evidence received by the City in the proceedings for zoning designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure zoning designation are in accordance with the amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian on October 11, 2016, Resolution No. 16-1173, and the UDC, Title 11. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth - herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement the following words,terms, and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for,unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 CITY: means and refers to the City of Meridian, a party to this Agreement, which is a municipal Corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. 3.2 OWNERS: means and refers to Gem Prep: Meridian North,LLC whose address is PO Box 86,Deary,Idaho 83823,the parties that own said Property and shall include any subsequent owner(s) of the Property. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—GEM INNOVATION SCHOOLS(H-2020-0043) PAGE 2 OF 9 Page 297 Item#19. 3.3 DEVELOPER: means and refers to Bouma, USA, whose address is 3033 Orchard Vista Dr. Suite 309 Grand Rapids, MI 48546, the party that is developing said Property and shall include any subsequent developer(s)of the Property. 3.4 PROPERTY: means and refers to that certain parcel(s) of Property located in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as described in Exhibit"A"describing the parcel to be bound by this Development Agreement and attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall vest the right to develop the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed under the UDC. 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1. Owners and/or Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the conceptual site plan, conceptual building elevations, conceptual landscape plan and the provisions contained in the Staff Report attached to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law attached hereto as Exhibit "B:. b. All structures shall comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural - Standards Manual and the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19. An application for Design Review shall be submitted concurrently with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application and approved prior to submittal of building permit applications. c. Applicant shall construct a segment of the City's 10-foot multi-use pathway along N. McDermott Road and the south boundary in accord with UDC 11-3A-8 and 1I- 3B-12. Prior to occupancy of any building, the applicant shall obtain City Council's approval of a public pedestrian easement and record said document. d. Applicant shall comply with any ACHD conditions of approval. e. The applicant shall comply with the ordinances in effect at the time of application submittal. f. The only use allowed to develop on the property is an education institution. Said use shall comply with the specific use standards in UDC 11-4-3-14. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—GEM INNOVATION SCHOOLS(H-2020-0043) PAGE 3 OF 9 Page 298 Item#19. g. The applicant shall work with Staff and the City Arborist to provide tree mitigation plan at time of CZC. h. The applicant shall construct a 10-foot wide landscape buffer on the north boundary of Gem Street in accord with UDC 11-313-7C. 6. COMPLIANCE PERIOD This Agreement must be fully executed within six (6) months after the date of the Findings for the annexation and zoning or it is null and void. 7. DEFAULT/CONSENT TO DE-ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: 7.1 Acts of Default. Either party's failure to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement shall constitute default under this Agreement. 7.2 Notice and Cure Period. In the event of Owners and/or Developer's default of this Agreement,Owners and/or Developer shall have thirty(30)days from receipt of written notice from City to initiate commencement of action to correct the breach and cure the default,which action must be prosecuted with diligence and completed within one hundred eighty (180) days; provided, however, that in the case of any such default that cannot with diligence be cured within such one hundred eighty(180)day period,then the time allowed to cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. 7.3 Remedies. In the event of default by Owners and/or Developer that is not cured after notice as described in Section 7.2, Owners and/or Developer shall be deemed to have consented to modification of this Agreement and de- annexation and reversal of the zoning designations described herein, solely against the offending portion of Property and upon City's compliance with all applicable laws,ordinances and rules, including any applicable provisions of Idaho Code §§ 67-6509 and 67-6511. Owners and/or Developer reserve all rights to contest whether a default has occurred. This Agreement shall be enforceable in the Fourth Judicial District Court in Ada County by either City or Owners and/or Developer, or by any successor or successors in title or by the assigns of the parties hereto. Enforcement may be sought by an appropriate action at law or in equity to secure the specific performance of the covenants, agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein. 7.4 Delay. In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either Owners and/or Developer or City is delayed for causes that are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes,the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—GEM INNOVATION SCHOOLS(H-2020-0043) PAGE 4 OF 9 Page 299 Item#19. 7.5 Waiver. A waiver by City of any default by Owners and/or Developer of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the default and defaults waived and shall neither bar any other rights or remedies of City nor apply to any subsequent default of any such or other covenants and conditions. 8. INSPECTION: Owners and/or Developer shall, immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the Property as required by this Agreement or by City ordinance or policy, notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other ordinances of the City that apply to said Property. 9. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: City shall record this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits,and submit proof of such recording to Owners and/or Developer,prior to the third reading of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the re-zoning of the Property by the City Council. If for any reason after such recordation, the City Council fails to adopt the ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property contemplated hereby, the City shall execute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement. 10. ZONING: City shall,following recordation of the duly approved Agreement,enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the Property as specified herein. 11. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The City may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, cash deposits, certified check or negotiable bonds, as allowed under the UDC,to insure the installation of required improvements,which the Owners and/or Developer agree to provide, if required by the City. 12. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed,completed,and accepted by the City, or sufficient surety of performance is provided by Owners and/or Developer to the City in accordance with Paragraph 11 above. 13. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That Owners and/or Developer agree to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian unless otherwise provided by this Agreement. 14. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY: with copy to: City Clerk City Attorney City of Meridian City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 OWNERS: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—GEM INNOVATION SCHOOLS(H-2020-0043) PAGE 5 OF 9 Page 300 Item#19. Gem Prep: Meridian North, LLC PO Box 86 Deary, ID 83823 DEVELOPER: Bouma, USA 3033 Orchard Vista Dr. Suite 309 Grand Rapids, MI 48546 14.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 15. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted,to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 16. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term,condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 17. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including City's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the Owners and/or Developer,each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. City agrees,upon written request of Owners and/or Developer,to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if City, in its sole and reasonable discretion, had determined that Owners and/or Developer have fully performed their obligations under this Agreement. 18. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 19. DUTY TO ACT REASONABLY: Unless otherwise expressly provided,each party shall act reasonably in giving any consent,approval,or taking any other action under this Agreement. 20. COOPERATION OF THE PARTIES: In the event of any legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third party (including a governmental entity or official) challenging the validity of any provision in this Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate in defending such action or proceeding. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—GEM INNOVATION SCHOOLS(H-2020-0043) PAGE 6 OF 9 Page 301 Item#19. 21. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition and understandings between Owners and/or Developer and City relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises,agreements,conditions or understanding,either oral or written, express or implied, between Owners and/or Developer and City, other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns,and pursuant,with respect to City,to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. 21.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing re-zoning of the subject Property herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 22. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective on the date the Meridian City Council shall adopt the amendment to the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property and execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. [end of text; signatures, acknowledgements, and Exhibits A and B follow] DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—GEM INNOVATION SCHOOLS(H-2020-0043) PAGE 7 OF 9 Page 302 Item#19. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. OWNERS: Gem Prep: Meridian North, LLC By: Its r 11 ' '� � G MA Agin N DEVELOPER: Bouma,USA By: rr Its: ►e�` Q5Vr4Pn4O r"C@r CITY OF MERIDIAN ATTEST: By: Mayor Robert E. Simison Chris Johnson, City Clerk DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—GEM INNOVATION SCHOOLS(H-2020-0043) PAOr 8 OF 9 Item#19. STATE OF rr-i C,, ss: County of On this Z-9 day of 2020, before►ne,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared known or identified to me to be the of Bourn a,USA,and the person who signed above and acknowledged to the that he executed the same on behalf of said entity. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL) 7ACUngin BQU�IIhil1 C•STATE OF MICHIGAN Notary Public for NTY OF KENT Residing a#: n Expires Jan.26.2022 My Commission Expires: U 2 2 unty of t� STATE OF IDAHO ) 2)--~utk : ss: County of#da ) On this_9ft day of 2020, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared l-en.,,I ( Tu, cr known or identified to me to be the hvr"-d CLe';{rw0-n of Gem Prep:Meridian North LLC and acknowledged tome that he executed the same on behalf of said school. ITj+W'Trt 44S WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this ccrti Fic� aia�a�hKten. �•� Notary Public for Idaho ' PUBLIC : Residing at: ,,.�[ Coca+ 61 �� &�rCw No %O•,.` My Commission Expires; G-a r a t bfpel STATE OF IDXIO ) ss County of Ada ) On this 8th day of September 2020, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Robert E.Simison and Chris Johnson,known or identified tome to be the Mayor and Clerk,respectively,of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: Meridian, Idaho Commission expires: 3-28-2022 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—GEM INNOVATION SCHOOLS(H-2020-0043) PAGE 9 OF 9 Page 304 Item#19. EXHIBIT A [`�AMH >~�. , FOX LAND SURVEYS engineering EXHIBIT ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION GEM PREP MERIDIAN NORTH TAX PARCEL NO.5042832566 A parcel of land within the Southwest 114 of the Northwest 114 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 28,Township 4 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,and more particularly described as follows. COMMENCING at the Southwest Corner of Section 28 monumented by a found brass cap as described in CP&F Instrument No.2019-017185 at the intersection of N.McDermott Road and W.McMillan Road,thence along the section line, North 01'00'44"East,1315.33 feet to the S 1f 16 Corner to Sections 28&29,the southwes`,comer of the Gem Prep Meridian North parcel and the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing North 01'00'44°East,774.50 feet to the northwest corner of the Gem Prep Meridian North parcel and the existing limits of Meridian City; Thence along the existing limits of Meridian Cityand The Oaks North preliminary plat boundary,South 89'21'13" East,450.06 feet to the northeast corner of the Gem Prep Meridian North parcel; Thence continuing along toe existing limits of Meridian City and The Oaks North preliminary plat boundary, South 01°00'44"West,774.77 feet to the southeast corner of the Gem Prep Meridian North parcel; Thence along the existing limits of Meridian City and the Oakwind preliminary plat boundary,North 89'19'10" West,450.06 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 8.00 acres more or less. Referto the attached EXHIBIT Survey Map_ END OF DESCRIPTION Prepared by: Ronald M.Hodge,PI-S 03-43-2020 L Ef gh�ti0�G15 T F,p�Q.3G�� p 8575 9 {f of ra*�oU4. 680 S.Progress Ave.,Suite#2B• Meridian,Idaho 83642 •Tel:208-342-7957• Web:hmh-Ilc.com Equal Opportunity Employer Gem Innovation School H-2020-0043 Page 305 Item#19. EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT SURVEY MAPS r S$9° 21' 13"E 450.06' EXISTING CITY LIMITS 77 o ea iuo SCALE: 1 100' T w GEM PREP P �� MER01AN FORTH �w TAX PARCEL Na. vtG A o SO42837566 0 d z o rA 71 it g fi 857 Q 5 x N,a3•o3-7c 1116 Comer EXISTING CITY WITS FS -ir ' Point of Beginning N89° 19' 10"VV 450.06' 940 o rn — u, in- � p � pR�Ul1�t�A m m N LEGEND 29 28 ANNEXATION BOUNDARY — — — SECTION RM PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY 32 33 SURVEY MONUMENTS McMillan Road FOX LAND SURVEYS 20009-01 Legal Sketch.dwg (208)342-7957 Gem Innovation School H-2020-0043 Page 306 Item#19. EXHIBIT B CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EN AND DECISION&ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Annexation and Zoning of 8 acres of land with the R-15 zoning district to develop a 42,408 SF 1-story college preparatory school by Gem Innovation School. Case No(s). H-2020-0043 For the City Council Hearing Date of. July 7, 2020 (Findings on July 21, 2020) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 7, 2020,incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 7, 2020, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 7, 2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 7, 2020, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law l. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17, 2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 7, 2020, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR GEM INNOVATION SCHOOL AZ H-2020-0043 - I - Page 307 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 321 of 590 Item#19. reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code§ 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Annexation and Zoning is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of July 7, 2020, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6) month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28)days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521,any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52,Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of July 7, 2020 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR GEM INNOVATION SCHOOL AZ H-2020-0043 -2- Page 308 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 322 of 590 Item#19. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 21st day of July 2020. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED YEA COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED YEA COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED YEA COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED YEA COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED YEA MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By. Charlene Way Dated: 7-21-2020 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR GEM INNOVATION SCHOOL AZ H-2020-0043 -4- Page 309 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 324 of 590 ,rem#19. EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY N --- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 7/7/2020 r� ---- ---- Le gend DATE: _F- I'rc:ev- TO: Mayor&City Council r FROM: Alan Tiefenbach, Associate Planner ---- 208-489-0573 ------- Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2020-0043 r Gem Innovation School LOCATION: The site is located at 5390 N. McDermott Rd, approximately'/4 mile north of the W. McMillan Rd/N. McDermott Rd n4 intersection, in the SW 1/4 of Section 28, Township 4N., Range 1 W. 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Annexation &zoning of 8 acres of land with the R-15 zoning district to develop a 42,408 SF I-story college preparatory school for grades K-12. Enrollment estimate is approximately 600 children. The applicant is Gem Innovation Schools. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 8 acres Future Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential Existing Land Use(s) SFR/Rural Proposed Land Use(s) Educational Facility Current Zoning RUT in Ada County Proposed Zoning R-15 Neighborhood meeting date;#of March 3,2020—6 attendees. attendees: Page ] Page 310 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 325 of 590 Item#19. b. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Yes • Requires ACHD Commission No Action es/no Access(Arterial/Collectors/State Three accesses are proposed. There are two accesses Hwy/Local)(Existing and Proposed) proposed from N.McDermott Rd to the west,a collector, and there is a third northern access planned to connect Gem Street to a proposed stub street in the Oaks North Subdivision. Stub Street/Interconnectivity/Cross The property is proposed to connect to a stub street in the Access Oaks North Subdivision to the north.The eastern stub street is not being extended into the site however,the applicant is proposing a pedestrian connection to the residential development.This connectivity has been coordinated with ACHD, Toll Brothers and the applicant. Existing Road Network No existing streets within the site,property will connect to a stub street at the north,N. McDermott Road exists to the west. Existing Arterial Sidewalks/ There are no existing buffers or sidewalk along N. Buffers McDermott Rd at the west boundary of the site. Proposed Road Improvements ACHD is requiring applicant to construct McDermott Road as'/2 of a 36 foot with curb,gutter and detached sidewalk. There will also be a new internal road(Gem Way) connecting to the Oaks North. Distance to nearest City Park(+ 2.3 miles to Keith Bird Legacy Park size) Fire Service The building will provide fire sprinklers. There is a future fire station planned within the 5-minute response time. • Distance to Police Station 8.5 miles • Police Response Time There is no available data,but the expected response time to this area in an emergency is about 3-5 minutes.The average response time in the City of Meridian is just under 4 minutes. • Calls for Service 56 within 1-mile radius. • Accessibility No issues with the proposed access • Specialty/resource needs None • Crashes Between 3/l/2019-2/29/2020,the Meridian Police Department responded to 4 crashes within a mile of the proposed development. See attached documents for details. Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Services Approximately 360-feet to the east in The Oaks North Subdivision. • Sewer Shed North McDermott Trunkshed • Estimated Project Sewer See Application ERU's • WRRF Declining Balance 13.92 • Project Consistent with WW Yes Master Plan/Facility Plan Page 2 Page 311 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 326 of 590 Item#19. Description Details Page Water • Distance to Water Services Applicant must connect water to the north in Gem Way to Oaks North Subdivision. Also, stub a water main and hydrant to the west at McDermott Rd. • Pressure Zone I • Estimated Project Water See Applicant ERU's • Water Quality No concerns • Project Consistent with Water Yes Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns None Page 3 Page 312 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 327 of 590 Item#19. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend Legend I EllP�v"e•�- Lx -'ter � P ec' Lx❑ on e Law Den ity Medium Density — Re idential Residential —� • Y;V- IL AAmed-High I city s� Residential �• l�AU-�hl _ Zoning Map Planned Development Map Legend Legend �. Prrs}ent Locafian. l Pr j t Lana ian a City Lind# RUT — Pllo"r ad Par is in n R-4 I 0 leR-15 R-1 S r - RUT r . g R-8 R_4 .- }} RUT j III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Paul Bierlein, Bouma USA. —445 Pettis, Suite 201.,Ada, MI 49301 B. Owner: Gem Innovation Schools—2750 E. Gala Street.,Meridian, ID 83642 C. Representative: Paul Bierlein, Bouma USA. —445 Pettis, Suite 201.,Ada, MI 49301 — Page 4 Page 313 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 328 of 590 Item#19. IV. NOTICING Planning & Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper Notification 5/13/2020 6/19/2020 Radius notification mailed to properties within 300 feet 5/12/2020 6/16/2020 Site Posting Date 5/14/2020 6/22/2020 Nextdoor posting 5/12/2020 6/16/2020 V. STAFF ANALYSIS a. Annexation: The proposed annexation area is contiguous to City annexed property and is within the Area of City Impact Boundary. A legal description and exhibit map for the annexation area is included in Section VII.A. b. Future Land Use Map Designation(https:llwww.meridiancity.or /g compplan) Medium Density Residential—This designation allows for dwelling units at gross densities of three to eight dwelling units per acre. Density bonuses may be considered with the provision of additional public amenities such as a park, school, or land dedicated for public services. The applicant is requesting the R-15 zoning district because schools are a permitted use in this zoning district and would result in a more expeditious review. A subsequent development agreement will limit the allowed uses to an educational facility in perpetuity. A DA is recommended as a condition of the annexation with the provisions included in Section VIII.A1. The DA is required to be signed by the property owner(s)/developer and returned to the City within 6 months of the Council granting the annexation for approval by City Council and subsequent recordation. The MDR designation of the FL UM emphasizes the importance of adequate access to schools. Providing adequate schools is supported in the Comprehensive Plan as discussed below. Staff finds the proposed annexation and zoning to R-15 with a development agreement that restricts uses only to an educational facility to be generally consistent with the Future Land Use Map designation of Medium Density Residential. c. Comprehensive Plan Policies (hgps:11www.meridiancity.org/compplan): Goals, Objectives, & Action Items: Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this application and apply to the proposed use of this property (staff analysis in italics): Page 5 Page 314 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 329 of 590 Item#19. 2.03.01 —"Jointly plan and site schools and subdivisions to ensure mutual benefits, neighborhood identity, and community health." Several large subdivisions have been approved recently in the vicinity. This includes the Oaks North and South which comprise approximately 1,000 lots total. Many of the lots in the Oaks South are presently building out. The proposed school and adjacent neighborhoods are generally developing along similar timelines, and the school is proposed to be integrated into these surrounding neighborhoods via an internal road at the north and two pedestrian pathways. The first pathway is a 14' wide pathway at the south perimeter of the property which will begin at N. McDermott Road and run along the Creason Lateral at the south perimeter of the property. The second pathway is a pedestrian connection into the eastern portion of the North Oaks neighborhood at Double Rock Road. The capacity of educational facilities has been a concern often raised in recent public meetings. The Gem Innovation School will be a charter school, open to the public, which is planned to serve approximately 600 children and is proposed to be developed along a similar timeline as the Oaks North and South neighborhoods. Facilities within an easy walk to the adjacent neighborhood is a mutual benefit to the school and the adjacent community. Also, local educationalfacilities are often associated with a neighborhood's identity and serve as community meeting places. 2.03.011)Ensure the location and design of schools are compatible with existing and planned neighborhoods and land uses. In general, a school is a community use that can be very compatible with a residential neighborhood. The more the school is integrated into the neighborhood, the more of a benefit to the community and the safer for the students. That said, compatibility with the neighborhood can also be a function of design. This proposal includes landscape buffers of a minimum width of 10'along the perimeter of the property as well as a 40' landscape buffer along N. McDermott Road. Building heights have been kept below 30',primary access is being directed to McDermott Road, and there are requirements of the UDC regarding lighting being downcast and shielded. In addition, the building design will be subject to the City's design review standards in the UDC and the Architectural Design Manual. 2.03.01E Work with West Ada School District to locate and connect schools to safe and accessible walking,bicycle, transit, and automobile routes. As mentioned, there are two non-motorized connections being provided into the adjacent neighborhood via a pathway along the Creason Lateral and from the eastern side of the school to Double Rock Road. There is an internal vehicular access to the local neighborhood at the north, and primary access occurs from N. McDermott Road, a Principal Arterial. There is also a 10'wide proposed pathway planned along the length of the property fronting N. McDermott Road. Page 6 Page 315 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 330 of 590 Item#19. d. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: An existing residence, constructed in 1940, exists on the property. This residence is proposed for removal. All structures should be removed from the property with development of the school site. e. Proposed Use Analysis: This proposal includes an approximately 42,500 square foot charter school providing education from kindergarten to 12th grade, including college preparation. This is considered an educational use and is allowed by right in the R-15 zone district, subject to the specific use standards below. f Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3-14): UDC 11-4-3-14. (Education Institutions) requires elementary schools to be located within the center of neighborhoods with access encouraged from local streets. Middle and high schools may take access off a designated arterial or collector street. Elementary school locations adjacent to public parks or open space are encouraged. At least thirty percent (30%)of the perimeter of an elementary school site should be open to streets or open space areas. Gem Innovation School is intended to serve Kindergarten to Grade 12. The school is located adjacent to the developing Oaks North and South Subdivisions, and will be connected to the neighborhood via Gem Way (local street) at the north. There are also two proposed access from N. McDermott Rd, a collector street. A significant percentage of the site is open to streets and open space; a 10'wide multiuse pathway is proposed along the entire western perimeter of the site (adjacent to N. McDermott Road) and a 10' multiuse pathway is proposed along the southern periphery. In addition, 440'of the 775' eastern perimeter remains open by locating playfields in this area. g. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The zoning is proposed to be R-15. This requires a street setback of 25' (for garages), rear setback of 12' and interior side setbacks of 3' Landscape buffers of 25' are required along arterial streets. Building height is limited to 40'. The building maintains a street setback from N. McDermott Road and a rear setback from the property line of at least 170'. There is more than a 200'setbackfrom the north property line and 75'from the eastern side property line. There is a 40'landscape buffer proposed along N. McDermott Road which is comprised of Kentucky Bluegrass, a 10' wide pathway and a landscaped berm of undulating height east of the pathway. The height of the building is proposed at 30; 10'less than the allowed maximum. As will be discussed in the landscaping section, landscape buffers are proposed along all four perimeters of the property as well. Page 7 Page 316 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 331 of 590 Item#19. h. Access/Traffic(UDC 11-3A-3): As mentioned above, three accesses are proposed. There are two accesses proposed from N. McDermott Rd to the west, a collector, and there is a third northern access planned to connect Gem Street to a proposed stub street in the Oaks North Subdivision. Three pedestrian pathways are proposed to connect the site. The first is a 10'pathway the applicant will construct that runs along the property paralleling N. McDermott Road. The second will be a 10'multiuse pathway along the southern periphery adjacent to the Creason Lateral. The third is a pedestrian connection into the eastern portion of the North Oaks neighborhood at Double Rock Road. ACHD did not express any additional issues regarding access and supported the road extension and McDermott Road access. Further, ACHD communicated to staff that the stub street on the east boundary did not need to extend into the site. Pedestrian connection would suffice. This was discussed with ACHD, and both affected land owners. However, Staff has not received a staff report from ACHD to verify the connectivity is acceptable by the transportation authority. i. Parking (UDC 11-3C): Parking requirements for Educational Institutions per section 11-4-3-14 of the UDC requires one parking space for every four hundred(400) square feet of gross floor area. Based on a proposed size of 42,398 square feet this amounts to 106 spaces. The concept plan shows I10 parking spaces of a minimum size of 9'x 19'as required by 11-3C-5 of the UDC. The conceptual site plan, circulation plan and landscape plan reflect multiple drive aisles and a design which shows separate drop off and pick up areas. Staff understands the incentive to ensure safety and satisfactory circulation but believes a significant amount of asphalt is being employed. If there were a more efficient design, less paving would be required. This would reduce heat island effects, reduce the amount of necessary drainage improvements and decrease impairment to water quality. Staff will discuss these issues with the Applicant at length during the subsequent Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC). j. Pathways (UDC 11-3A-8): There is proposed 10 foot multi-use pathway proposed along N. McDermott Road and another 10 foot multi-use pathway proposed along the southern perimeter,paralleling Creason Lateral. This pathway is an extension from a future phase of the Oaks North development. Per UDC I1-3B-12C, the applicant shall provide 5-feet of landscaping along both sides of the pathway. Prior to occupancy of the structure, the applicant should submit and obtain approval of a pedestrian pathway easement from City Council. Further, the applicant should coordinate with the applicable irrigation district and conform to any requirements of the district. Page 8 Page 317 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 332 of 590 Item#19. k. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): No sidewalks presently exist along N. McDermott Road. The Applicant proposes to install a 10'detached walkway along the length of the property in this area. 6'wide sidewalks are proposed on both sides of Gem Street which connects the site to the neighborhood at the north. 1. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-17): No parkways are proposed with this application. in. Waterways (UDC 11-3A-6): The Creason Lateral runs along the south boundary. This proposal includes a paved walkway paralleling this area. The Applicant intends to culvert this ditch. Any improvements that occur within the easement area will require coordination with the irrigation district. n. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): The landscape plan indicates 6'high vinyl coated chain linkfence along the eastern portion of the site. The applicant will be required to comply with the fence standards in the UDC 11-3A-7. o. Utilities (UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is proposed in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. The property will have an 8-inch water and sewer lines which will connect to Doublerock Drive. Street lighting is required to be installed in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. See Section VIII.B below for Public Works comments/conditions. p. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): A landscape buffer of at least 35' is required along N. McDermott Road, an entryway corridor. A minimum density of one tree per thirty-five (35) linear feet is required in this buffer. A five-foot (5) wide minimum landscape buffer is required adjacent to parking, loading, or other paved vehicular use areas, including driveways. Interior parking lot landscaping shall be required on any parking lot with more than twelve (12) spaces. No linear grouping of parking spaces shall exceed twelve (12) in a row,without an internal planter island. The conceptual site plan shows a landscape buffer of 40'wide along N. McDermott Road. This includes grass directly adjacent to the road, a 10'wide paved pathway, and additional landscaped area of widths varying between 20'and 25'east of the pathway, terminating in undulating berms. Based on a frontage length of approximately 776 feet, 22 trees are required within the buffer. It appears at least 28 trees are in this area. The final landscape plan will be reviewed at the time of the CZC. Page 9 Page 318 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 333 of 590 Item#19. q. Tree Preservation(UDC 11-3B-10): The UDC requires mitigation for all existing trees four inch(4") caliper or greater that are removed from the site. This mitigation includes equal replacement of the total calipers lost on site up to an amount of one hundred percent(100%)replacement. The Applicant has requested a "council waiver"of the required tree mitigation. According to their narrative, 37 trees must be removed, which amounts to a total caliper of 508 inches. The Applicant's calculations deduce this to be 254 additional trees of 2" caliper whereas they are proposing replacing the 37 trees being removed with 167 new trees. The Applicant states it is important to provide sufficient open space including sports courts and playfields and requiring additional trees would prove difficult. The City Arborist considered the Applicant's request and noted there are several trees which are probably in such a condition as to not require mitigation and is amenable to deeming them inappropriate for mitigation. However, staff is not convinced there are no other options for either retention of existing trees or replacement with new trees. Also, there is a significant amount of paving proposed for the parking area as well as the paved playfields at the eastern perimeter of the site. Staff believes there are additional opportunities to buffer the site and reduce heat island effects. Staff will work with the Applicant on the required trees and tree preservation during the subsequent Certificate of Zoning Compliance. A Council Waiver is not the appropriate mechanism; any deviations would occur through the Alternative Compliance process as indicated in Section 11-5B-5 of the UDC. r. Building Elevations (UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): The Applicant has submitted colored elevations that proposes a flat-roofed design with muted earth tone colors and building materials including lap siding, hardie board, and metal panels. The proposed architecture will be reviewed in detail during the Certificate of Zoning Compliance and must meet the requirements of the City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual and the site and structure design standards in UDC I I- 3A-19. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Annexation with the requirement of a Development Agreement per the provisions and comments included in Section VII in accord with the Findings in Section VIII. B. The Meridian Planning &Zoning Commission heard this item on May 28, 2020. At the public hearing, the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ request. Page 10 Page 319 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 334 of 590 Item#19. 1. Summary of Commission public heariM a. In favor: Dan Henrickson and Bill Hadlock, Paradigm Design(Applicant's Representative) b. In opposition: None c. Commenting: Dan Henrickson and Bill Hadlock, Paradigm Design(Applicant's Representative) d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Alan Tiefenbach f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons 2. Key issue(s) of public testimony a. None 3. Key issue(s) of discussion by Commission: a. Commission discussed whether Meridian Fire was supporting the proposed turn-around at the northeast portion of the site. Applicant responded that they did support it as proposed. b. Commission discussed staff s recommended condition to pipe the Creason Lateral. The applicant stated this had already been done. C. Commission discussed the applicant's request to change the condition of approval that the required the applicant to comply with tree preservation mitigation standards to "the applicant and staff will work with the City arborist to provide a tree mitigation plan." The Commission was agreeable to this request. d. Commission discussed staffs recommendation for a 10' buffer along;the north side of Gem Way. The applicant was initially opposed to this because they believed the adjacent property owner had already designed a buffer tract into their development. As it ended up, they had not. Since this time, the applicant is agreeable to this condition and has revised the site plan and landscape plan accordingly. 4. Commission change(s) to Staff recommendation: a. Remove Condition a.viii that requires tiling of the Creason Lateral. b. Change the language of Condition a. v.iii that requires the applicant to comply with all tree mitigation requirements to "the applicant will work with the CitX Arborist to provide a tree mitigation plan at time of CZC." 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. Add the following Public Works conditions of approval: Page 11 Page 320 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 335 of 590 Item#19. 1. The applicant shall be required to pay the Oaks Lift Station and Pressure Sewer Reimbursement Fees in the amount of$265.25 per equivalent residential unit (ERU). The reimbursement fees for this application shall be paid with the first building permit. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay the Oaks Lift Station Pump Upgrades Reimbursement Fees in the amount of$185.43 per equivalent residential unit (ERU). The reimbursement fees for this application Shall be paid with the first building permit. C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on July 7, 2020. At the public hearing, the Council moved to approve the subject Annexation and Zoning request. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing_ a. In favor: Paul Bierlein from Bouma USA. b. In opposition: None c. Commenting: Paul Bierlein from Bouma USA.. d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Alan Tiefenbach f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s) of public testimony a. None 3. Key issue(s) of discussion by City Council: a. None. 4. City Council change(s) to Commission recommendation: a. Add the following Public Works conditions of approval: 1. The applicant shall be required to pay the Oaks Lift Station and Pressure Sewer Reimbursement Fees in the amount of$265.25 per equivalent residential unit (ERU). The reimbursement fees for this application shall be paid with the first building permit. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay the Oaks Lift Station Pump Upgrades Reimbursement Fees in the amount of$185.43 per equivalent residential unit (ERU). The reimbursement fees for this application Shall be paid with the first building permit. Page 12 Page 321 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 336 of 590 Item#19. VII. EXHIBITS A. Annexation Legal Description and Exhibit Map *FOX' HMH 16 LAND SURVEYS engineering EXHIBIT ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION GEM PREP MERIDIAN NORTH TAX PARCEL NO,SO42832566 A parcel of land within the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 28,Township 4 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,and more particularly described asfollows. COMMENCING at the Southwest Corner of Section 28 monumented by a Found brass cap as described in CP&F Instrument No.2019-017185 at the intersection of N.McDermott Road and W.McMillan Road,thence along the section line,North 01'00'44"East,1315.33 Feet to the S 1f 16 Comer cc Sections 28&29,the southwest comer of the Gem Prep Meridian North parcel and the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing North 01'00'44"East,77430 feet to the northwest corner of the Gem Prep Meridian North parcel and the existing limits of Meridian City; Thence along the existing limits of Meridian Cityand The Oaks North preliminary plat boundary,South 89°21'13" East,450.06 feet to the northeast corner of the Gem Prep Meridian North parcel; Thence continuing along the existing limits of Meridian City and The Oaks North preliminary plat boundary, South 01'00'44"West,774.77 feet to the southeast corner of the Gem Prep Meridian North parcel; Thence along the existing limits of Meridian Cityand the Oakwind preliminary plat boundary,North 89'19'10" West,450.06 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 8.00 acres more or less. Refer to the attached EXHIBIT Survey Map. END OF DESCRIPTION Prepared by: Ronald M.Hodge,PLS 03-43-2020 fI� f �� LAkIJ 680 S.Progress Ave.,Suite#213• Meridian,Idaho 83642 *Tel:208-342-7957• Web:hmh-Ilc.com Equal Opportunity Employer Page 322 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 337 of 590 Item#19. EXHIBIT SURVEY MAP S890 21' 13"E 45U6' _l exIsxINU ciT,•umrrs 77 G 59 10D 5 SCALE. 1"=100' 0 LU GEM PREP �4 MERIDIAN NORTH ;a � TAX PARCEL No �r W a S042837666 o Q z r� �a 857 S1116 Comer Nr° v3 �x15�INGCITYufw11T5 ` 'F Point of 0 e % a� Beginning N890 19' 10"VV 450.06' �D � " on p '51-1viNA LEGEND Z9 28 ANNEXATION BOUNDARY — — SECTION R,w PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY 32 33 SURVE`!MONUMENTS McMillan Road FOX LAND SURVEYS 20009-01 Legal Sketch.dwg (208) 342-7957 Page 14 Page 323 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 338 of 590 Item#19. B. Revised Conceptual Site Plan(date: 6/22/2020) 1�j g� nµtlYll�Lia�.au�.zrrx'Jt�R ------------ �� 9C R4" �ra�•�cvma�aia �- �I I•� I ' I I � tL• .� ��'~ II y I I i '- E i I Ir �.M1 E �a 7I Ie EB �� a I E I� it� f ,�. i .,1 I 1 ' IE E i I I • r I � �� � E" �w � F�•Fl�a i k• +� .. �: I •` 1 '2S Page 15 Page 324 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 339 of 590 +r- 4 � �F �.�.ra.�7r•it ,.lR '�, $ 9 *: Ar EMEsm am tD r y 16 Ll �ryjj is E i Item#19. D. Conceptual Circulation Plan �gII -.-- ----_--------- j --GEM WAY j I j I j I I � I � j I j I I I I I j I I jS o, I j I u-I I zl I of I j I gl j I I j I 1 I i D-WBLE rikk RD j I _ j I j i .. I I j I i I � j I -,snas=r-ig=.ii=r.rcte .—.—.—. .---.—.—.—.—.—.— ..---�._ Q I� ��:��fie Wk€IMB p p O G E M Bouma U A +� A � ��`�= � Page 326 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 341 of 590 Item#19. E. Conceptual Building Elevations (date: 3/27/2020) EXTERIOR FINISHES E F-1 A N❑ Omni Ini E E ..... cc 0 --- ------ ------------ ----- T cor11fl------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- ------- ----------- ------------ ------ ---------------•-- ---—-- ------ --- --- - ])gST ELEVATION -—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-— 7 51 711 F _71 571 71 T-6- F1 FE 161 E L, E E] \�z 1E O ILI L, --1T] 111 LLJ SgYTH ELEVATION 1 17 Z1 4112 11 Ll I E 11 IT 4 11 E FE I ZIE LL] LJ EAST ELEVATION �l 7V ■ ---------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- Lj NORTH ELEVATION A200 Page 18 Page 327 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 342 of 590 Item#19. VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION a. A Development Agreement (DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6) months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: i. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the conceptual site plan, conceptual building elevations, conceptual landscape plan and the provisions contained herein. ii. All structures shall comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual and the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19. An application for Design Review shall be submitted concurrently with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application and approved prior to submittal of building permit applications. iii. Applicant shall construct a segment of the City's 10-foot multi-use pathway along N. McDermott Road and the south boundary in accord with UDC I I-3A-8 and 11-313-12. Prior to occupancy of any building, the applicant shall obtain City Council's approval of a public pedestrian easement and record said document. iv. Applicant shall comply with any ACHD conditions of approval. V. The applicant shall comply with the ordinances in effect at the time of application submittal. vi. The only use allowed to develop on the property is an education institution. Said use shall comply with the specific use standards in UDC 11-4-3-14. vii. standards pef UDC 113B 1-0. The applicant shall work with Staff and the City Arborist to provide tree mitigation plan at time of CZC. viii. The applieapA shall be r-e"ied to tile the Gr-easen Later-a! in aeeer-danee wit the Nampa and Meridian 1frigation Distr-iet. Page 19 Page 328 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 343 of 590 Item#19. ix. The applicant shall construct a 10-foot wide landscape buffer on the north boundary of Gem Street in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C. X. The applicant shall be required to pay the Oaks Lift Station and Pressure Sewer Reimbursement Fees in the amount of$265.25 per equivalent residential unit (ERU). The reimbursement fees for this application shall be paid with the first building permit. xi. The applicant shall be required to pay the Oaks Lift Station Pump Upgrades Reimbursement Fees in the amount of$185.43 per equivalent residential unit (ERU). The reimbursement fees for this application Shall be paid with the first building permit. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Applicant will be responsible for the off-site extension of new sanitary sewer and water mainlines to the east to connect with the mainlines in The Oaks North Subdivision. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for the water mainline extension in Gem Way, from the north boundary to N. McDermott Road. A stub and hydrant will also be required west to McDermott Rd. C. ACHD https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=190639&dbid=0&repo=Meridi anCi D. CITY ARBORIST https://weblink.meridianciU.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=188578&dbid=0&repo=Meridi anCi E. POLICE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridianci02.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=188194&dbid=0&r0o=Meridi anCi F. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT (ACHD) https://weblink.meridianciU.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=188577&dbid=0&repo=Meridi anCi G. NMID Page 20 Page 329 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 344 of 590 Item#19. https:llweblink.meridiancit .org/WebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=187578&dbid=0&repo=Meridi anCi IX. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone (UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission, the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone, the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Council finds annexation of the subject site with an R-15 zoning designation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan MDR FLUM designation for this property use will be limited to educational facility by a subsequent development restriction (see Section V for more information). 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Council finds that a map amendment to the R-15 zoning district is consistent with Comprehensive Plan as the Plan puts high priority on the provision of adequate educational facilities. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The Council finds that the proposed zoning map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. Staff recommends the Commission and Council consider any oral or written testimony that may be provided when determining this finding. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including, but not limited to, school districts; and The Council finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not result in any adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site. 5. The annexation(as applicable) is in the best interest of city As the need for adequate educational facilities is supported by Comprehensive Plan, the Council finds that the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City. Page 21 Page 330 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 345 of 590 Item#20. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Fourth Addendum to Development Agreement Between the City of Meridian and Martin L. Hill &Hill Properties, L.P. (Owner/Developer) for Hill's Century Farm North (H-2020-0080) Page 331 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-117720 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=11 KRISTINA LOWRY 09/10/2020 10:53 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE FOURTH ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES: 1. City of Meridian 2. Martin L.Hill,Hill&Hill Properties,L.P.,Owner/Developer THIS F O U R T H ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is dated this 8thday of September , 2020, ("FOURTH ADDENDUM"), by and between City of Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho ("CITY"), whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642 and Martin L.Hill,Hill&Hill Properties,L.P.,whose address is 3625 E. Amity Road, Meridian, Idaho 83642, hereinafter called OWNER/DEVELOPER. RECITALS A. City and OWNER/DEVELOPER entered into that certain Development Agreement that was recorded on July 9, 2015 in the real property records of Ada County as Instrument No. 2015-061375 ("DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT)and Addendum to Development Agreement that was recorded on December 8, 2016 in the real property records of Ada County as Instrument No. 2016-119080 ("ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT"); a Second Addendum to Development Agreement that was recorded on April 24, 2019 in the real property records of Ada County as Instrument No. 2019-033207 ("SECOND ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT") and the Third Addendum to Development Agreement that was recorded on May 20,2020 in the real property records of Ada County as Instrument No.2020-059662 ("THIRD ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT")and a B. City and OWNER/DEVELOPER now desire to amend the Development Agreement (Instrument no. 2015-063175), the Addendum to Development Agreement(Instrument no. 2016-119080) and the Second Addendum to Development Agreement (Instrument no. 2019- 033207)and the Third Addendum to Development Agreement that was recorded on May 20,2020 in the real property records of Ada County as Instrument No.2020-059662 with this Fourth Addendum to Development Agreement which terms have been approved by the Meridian City Council in accordance with Idaho Code §67-6511 on August 11, 2020. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein,the parties agree as follows: 1. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall be bound by the terms of the original Development Agreement and all subsequent Addendums, except as follows: 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: Hill's Century Farm North—H-2020-0080 Page I Page 332 Item#20. 5.1. Owner/Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. Business hours of operation in the C-N district shall be limited from 6:00 am to 10:00 pm as set forth in UDC 11-2B-3A.4, except for the YMCA which is allowed to operate from 5:00 am to 10:00 pm.The residential care facility use does not violate the limitation on the hours of operation. b. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the amended concept plans dated October 30, 2019, included in the Staff Report attached to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law from the modification to development agreement(H-2019- 0134), attached hereto as Exhibit"A". c. Future development of this site should include a pedestrian pathway network that links the mixed use area with the residential and the elementary school/YMCA site as well as adjacent off-site properties. Vehicular connections should also be provided for interconnectivity within the site. d. The existing home in the R-8 zoning district that is proposed to remain at the south boundary of the annexation area midway between S. Eagle Road and S.Hillsdale Avenue shall be required to hook up to City water and sewer service within 60 days of the final platting of the estate lots, per MCC 9-14A; the existing home that fronts on E. Amity Road that is proposed to be removed with redevelopment of the site and the existing home that fronts on S. Hillsdale Avenue that is proposed to remain in the C-N district as long as the Hill's reside there are not required to hook up to City services. e. The rear or sides of homes on lots that face S. Eagle Road shall incorporate articulation through changes in materials, color, modulation, and architectural elements (horizontal and vertical)to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines. f. To ensure future development is consistent with the objectives and vision of the MU-N designation the following items will be considered in reviewing development applications: i. Community serving facilities (i.e. a school, park, YMCA, library, hospitals, churches,daycares,civic buildings,or public safety facilities)should be provided; ii. Street sections consistent with the Ada County Highway District Master Street Map are required; iii. Neighborhood serving uses and dwellings should be integrated; iv. Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 40%of the development area with net densities ranging from 4 to 8 units per acre with supporting non-residential services. Non-residential uses should be smaller scale and provide a good or service that people typically don't travel more than a mile for and need regularly; V. Non-residential buildings should be proportional to and blend in with residential buildings consistent with the design guidelines and conceptual elevations presented by the Owner/Developer and approved by City Council included in Exhibit J of the Staff Report attached to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law attached hereto as Exhibit"A"; vi. Employment opportunities for those living in the neighborhood are encouraged; Hill's Century Farm North—H-2020-0080 Page 2 Page 333 Item#20. vii. The mixed use project should be directly accessible to neighborhoods within the section by both vehicles and pedestrians; viii. Planning of the C-N property north of the park and YMCA shall consider appropriate visibility, parking and emergency access to the future neighborhood park. ix. Sample uses appropriate in the MU-N area would include: townhouses, multi- family developments, neighborhood grocer, drug stores, coffee/sandwich/ice- cream shops, vertically integrated buildings, live-work spaces, dry cleaner/laundromat, salons/spas, daycares, neighborhood-scale professional offices, medical/dental clinics, gift shops, schools, parks, churches, clubhouses, public uses,and other appropriate neighborhood uses. g. The R-8 and R-15 zoned residential portions of the annexation area shall be subdivided prior to issuance of any building permits beyond those required for the community center complex on Lot 101 as shown on the revised conceptual development plan dated October 30, 2019; building permit(s) for the community center complex may be issued prior to subdivision of the property. Subdivision of the C-N and C-C zoned commercial portions of the annexation area is not required prior to issuance of building permits. h. The buildings in the retail/professional office area shown on the conceptual development plan shall be arranged to create some form of common, usable area, such as a plaza or green space as desired in Mixed Use designated areas as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. i. Building sizes in the commercial retail/office portion of the development shall be limited to a 20,000 square foot building footprint as desired in MU-N designated areas in accord with the Comprehensive Plan (see page 25). If a structure contains a mix of both residential and office, or residential and commercial land uses, the maximum building size may exceed 20,000 square feet. j. A through driveway shall be provided on the Hill Property (Lot 150, Block 1) from E. Hill Park Lane to W. Rockhampton Ct. for emergency access purposes. 2. OWNER/DEVELOPER agrees to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian that are consistent with the terms of the Development Agreement and the Project Site shall be subject to de-annexation if the DEVELOPER, or their assigns, heirs, or successors shall not meet the conditions of this Addendum as herein provided, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian that are consistent with the terms of the Development Agreement and all Addendums 3. If any provision of this F o u r t h Addendum is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Fourth Addendum and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 4. This Fourth Addendum sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition, and understandings between OWNER/DEVELOPER and City relative to the subject matter herein,and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or under-standing, either oral or written, express or implied, between OWNER/DEVELOPER and City, other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Fourth Hill's Century Farm North—H-2020-0080 Page 3 Page 334 Item#20. Addendum shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced in writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with the respect to City, to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. 5. Except as herein provided, no condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing development of the subject Project Site herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 6. This Fourth Addendum shall be effective as of the date herein above written. 7. Except as amended by this Fourth Addendum, all terms of the Development Agreement, Addendum to Development Agreement, Second Addendum to Development Agreement and Third Addendum to Development Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. OWNER/DEVELOPER: Martin L. Hill CITY OF MERIDIAN ATTEST: By: Mayor Robert E. Simison Chris Johnson,City Clerk Hill's Century Farm North—H-2020-0080 Page 4 Page 335 Item#20. STATE OF IDAHO, ) ss County of Ada ) On thiday of , 2020, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personal l appeared Martin L. Hill, . .mho signed above and acknowledged to me that he executed the same of behalf of said partnership. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above ritten. SEAL �L""— Notary o Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: aA �T o r7 SHARI VAUGHAN My Commission xpires: (7- Notary Public-State of Idaho Commission Number 20181002 My Commission Expires Jun 1, 2024 STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) On this 8th day of September 2020, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson, known or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: Meridian, Idaho Commission expires: 3-28-2022 Hill"s Century Farm North—H-2020-0080 Page 5 Page 336 Item#20. CITY OF MERIDIAN 14 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW .. AND DECISION& ORDER + In the Matter of the Request for Modification to the Existing Development Agreement(Inst. #2020-059662—provision #5.1g) to Allow Building Permits for the Commercial Portion of the Development to be Issued prior to Subdivision of the Property,by Brighton Development. Case No(s).H-2020-0080 For the City Council Hearing Date of: July 28,2020 (Findings on August 11,2020) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH—MDA H-2020-0080 - I - Page 337 Item#20. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for a modification to the existing Development Agreement(Inst.No. 2020-059662) is hereby approved per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH—MDA H-2020-0080 -2- Page 338 Item#20. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 11th day of August 2020. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 8-11-2020 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH—MDA H-2020-0080 -3- Page 339 Item#20. EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORTC�WEN � � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 7/28/2020 DATE: Legend ILIN�t ct L-cofl-R3n TO: Mayor&City Council Lj FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 r % SUBJECT: H-2020-0080 x i Hill's Century Farm North-MDA LOCATION: South of E. Amity Rd. & east of S. Eagle Rd., in the NW 1/4 of Section 33, Township 3N.,Range IE. -- BEAR a I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Modification to the existing Development Agreement(Inst.#2020-059662—provision#5.1 g)to allow building permits for the commercial portion of the development to be issued prior to subdivision of the property. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Applicant: Kody Daffer, Brighton Development—2929 W. Navigator Rd., ID 83642 B. Owner: Martin L. Hill—3675 E. Amity Rd.,Meridian, ID 83642 C. Representative: Kody Daffer, Brighton Development—2929 W.Navigator Rd.,ID 83642 III. STAFF ANALYSIS The Applicant proposes to amend provision#5.1g in the existing Development Agreement(DA)(Inst. #2020-059662),to allow for building permits to be issued in the commercial portion of the development prior to subdivision of the property as currently required. The existing provision reads,"The annexation area shall be subdivided prior to issuance of any building permits beyond those required for the development of the school, YMCA and park site, a wireless communication facility, the assisted living facility, medical clinic, and the Hill's Century Farm North community center complex on common lot 101 as shown on the revised conceptual development plan dated October 30,2019." Page 1 Page 340 Item#20. EXHIBIT A The Applicant proposes the following change: "The residential portions of the annexation area shall be subdivided prior to issuance of any building permits beyond those required for the development of commercial uses, including but not limited to then )"M ^ and park site, a wireless communication facility, the assisted living facility, meal-ewe;and the Hill's Century Farm North self-service storage facility and the community center complex on common lot 101 as shown on the revised conceptual development plan dated October 30, 2019." Because commercial property is not typically required to be subdivided prior to issuance of building permits, Staff recommends the existing provision is stricken and alternate language is provided instead that would simplify the requirements for subdivision of the property,which Staff believes meets the Applicant's intended purpose, as follows: "The R-8 and R-15 zoned residential portions of the annexation area shall be subdivided prior to issuance of any building permits beyond those required for the community center complex on Lot 101 as shown on the revised conceptual development plan dated October 30,2019;building permit(s)for the community center complex may be issued prior to subdivision of the property. Subdivision of the C-N and C-C zoned commercial portions of the annexation area is not required prior to issuance of building permits." IV. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of a modification to the DA as recommended by Staff in Section V. B. The Meridian City Council heard these items on July 28, 2020. At the public hearing,the Council moved to approve the subject MDA request. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Mike Wardle, Brighton Corporation b. In opposition: None c. Commenting: James Phillips d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Request for mixed use development to occur on this site consistent with the MU-N FLUM designation to provided needed services in this area. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. None 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation. a. None V. EXHIBITS A. Development Agreement Provision#5.1 g: Existing: "The annexation area shall be subdivided prior to issuance of any building permits beyond those required for the development of the school,YMCA and park site, a wireless communication facility,the assisted living facility,medical clinic,and the Hill's Century Farm North community center complex on common lot 101 as shown on the revised conceptual development plan dated October 30, 2019." Page 2 Page 341 Item#20. EXHIBIT A Applicant's Proposed Change: "The residential portions of the annexation area shall be subdivided prior to issuance of any building permits beyond those required for the development of commercial uses, including but not limited to the school,vrar n , ,a park site, a wireless communication facility,the assisted living facility,media^' ^'mien and the Hill's Century Farm North self-service storage facili , and the community center complex on common lot 101 as shown on the revised conceptual development plan dated October 30, 2019." Staffs Recommended Change: "The aane*atien area shall be subdivided pr-iar-to issuanee of any building pefmits beyend thes-e fe"ifed fef the development of the seheel,YMCA and pafk site, a wireless e0M+nttf1i6atiE)ff facility,the assisted living f4eility,medieal elinic, and the Hill's Genwfy Farm Nofth eonununity Oeteber-30 2019." "The R-8 and R-15 zoned residential portions of the annexation area shall be subdivided prior to issuance of any building permits beyond those required for the community center complex on Lot 101 as shown on the revised conceptual development plan dated October 30,2019;building permit(s)for the community center complex may be issued prior to subdivision of the property. Subdivision of the C-N and C-C zoned commercial portions of the annexation area is not required prior to issuance of building permits." Page 3 Page 342 Item#21. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: License and Service Agreement for Budget Software to Questica, Ltd for the Not-To-Exceed amount of$271,112 Page 343 Item#21. C� fIEN , IN4, IDAHG-. MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL From: Finance Meeting Date: September 8, 2020 Presenter: Consent Estimated Time: 0 Topic: License and Service Agreement for Budget Software to Questica, Ltd for the Not-To- Exceed amount of$271,112 Recommended Council Action: Approval of License and Service Agreement for Budget Software to Questica, Ltd for the Not-To- Exceed amount of$271,112 Background: Procurement of Budget Software &installation services. This purchase is being made off the State of Idaho Contract. This Agreement is the result of months of research, and negotiation in conjunction with City Finance, Procurement and IT. Page 344 �I■ 4s%e ues ca QUESTICA LICENSE AND SERVICE AGREEMENT This SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT(the"Agreement") is made this September 15, 2020 (the"Effective Date") by and between QUESTICA LTD., a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware ("Questica") and City of Meridian, Idaho, including,without limitation,all its subdivisions,departments,and constituent entities within its legal scope and jurisdiction (collectively, the"City"). BACKGROUND A. Questica has made a substantial investment in the development of the QUESTICA BUDGET computer software products identified in the attached Quotation(the"Software"),and in the development of documentation related thereto (the"Documentation"and together with the Software, the"Work"). B. Questica has the right to license the Work to third parties. C. The City wishes to use the Work,and Questica has agreed to license such use, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration (the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged), Questica and City(collectively, the"Parties"and individually, a"Party")agree as follows: 1. PERMITTED USE. Subject to the terms of this Agreement,Questica hereby grants to City a perpetual, personal, revocable, non-transferable and non-exclusive license to use the Software, solely in executable code format, and the Documentation provided therewith,solely for City's own internal business purposes exclusively within the facilities and sites within the jurisdiction of the City. If City wishes to use the Software at or from an additional site or sites outside of its jurisdiction, City agrees to obtain a separate license for such site(s). City's right to use the Software and the Documentation is limited to those rights expressly set out herein. City shall not use the Software, in whole or in part, on behalf of or for the benefit of any other Person, including an affiliate of the City, except as expressly provided herein. 1.1 PERSONNEL WORK-AT-HOME RIGHTS. City's personnel (its employees and contractors) may use the Software from their homes as an extension of the license granted to the City, for business related purposes. City personnel may not use the Software at home for personal purposes. For greater clarity, City shall be responsible for the use of the Work by any contractors, including any actions of omissions of such contractors, as though they were employees of City. City shall promptly deny access to the Software to (a)any employee or contractor who is no longer employed by License; or(b) any staff member would not normally require the use of the Software in the at-work environment. 1.2 PERMITTED CUSTOMIZATIONS. Questica also grants the City a non-sublicensable, non-exclusive,non-transferable right to create,or to have created on its behalf,"Permitted Customizations"to the executable code components of the Software solely for internal use and only for use as part of and in conjunction with the related Software. "Permitted Customizations" is custom software or reports which are developed that access or interact with the Software or its associated database(s). The City may only create Permitted Customizations that do not require the source code of the Software to create the Permitted Customizations. Permitted Customizations Do Not Inhibit Questica's Right to Innovate. Independently, Questica is continually innovating and improving the Software to meet the needs of its customers. The City acknowledges that,while it has the ability to create its own Permitted Customizations, Questica must not be prevented from continuing to develop and enhance its software in any respect, even if such modifications may be similar to the Permitted Customizations in functionality, appearance or otherwise. Questica retains the right to (i)develop any modifications which may be similar to the Permitted Customizations; and (ii) integrate any or all of such modifications into its core product. 1.3 RESTRICTIONS ON USE. Except as set forth herein, City shall (a) not copy the Software except to copy it onto the site computers being used by City and to make copies of the Software solely for backup, training, disaster recovery or testing purposes; (b) not copy any of the Documentation for any use outside the site; (c) not assign this Agreement or transfer, lease, export or grant a sub-City of the Work or the license contained herein to any Person or organization except as and when authorized to do so by Questica in writing; (d) not reverse engineer, decompile or disassemble the Software; (e) not use the Questica License and Service Agreement Page 1 of 29 Work except as authorized herein; (f) take such precautions with respect to the Software, as it would take to protect its own proprietary software or hardware or information. For the purposes of this Agreement,"Person"includes an individual,corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, unincorporated organization, the Crown or any agency or instrumentality thereof or any other judicial entity recognized by law. 2. OWNERSHIP AND COPYRIGHT. Questica is the owner of all intellectual property rights in the Work, related written materials, logos, names and other support materials provided pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. No title to the intellectual property in the Work or in any magnetic media or other physical media provided therewith is transferred to the City by this Agreement. Questica shall defend City against any claim that the Work infringes a registered Canadian or United States'patent,copyright or trade-mark of any third party and Questica will pay resulting cost, damages and reasonable legal fees finally awarded, provided that i) City promptly notifies Questica in writing of the claim; and ii) Questica has sole control of the defense and all related settlement negotiations. If such claim has occurred or in Questica's opinion is likely to occur, City agrees to permit Questica at its option and expense, either to procure for City the right to continue using the Work or to replace or modify the same so that it becomes non-infringing without loss of functionality. Questica shall have no obligation to defend City or to pay costs, damages or legal fees for any claim based upon use of other than a current unaltered release of the Work, if such infringement would have been avoided by the use of a current unaltered release thereof. The foregoing states the entire obligations of Questica with respect to infringement or proprietary or intellectual rights of third parties. 3. LIMITED WARRANTY. Questica warrants that so long as Product Maintenance and Support services are provided by Questica that the Software,when properly installed,will perform substantially in accordance with the Documentation provided in connection therewith. If the Software does not so perform during such period, Questica will correct, at no cost to City, programming errors in the Software to make the Software so perform provided that i)the Software has been properly used by the City in accordance with Documentation provided in connection therewith; ii)City notifies Questica of the programming errors and describes the nature of the suspected errors and of the circumstances in which they occur; iii)Questica, using reasonable efforts, is able to confirm the existence of the programming errors; and iv) City or any third party has not changed or modified the Software. City agrees that Questica shall not be liable to the City or any other person, regardless of the cause, for the effectiveness or accuracy of the Software, the Documentation or any other related materials, or for any other special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising from or occasioned by the use of the Software, the Documentation or the related materials, or the failure or omission on the part of Questica to comply with its obligations under this Agreement. The City hereby agrees that Questica's maximum liability for any claim arising in connection with the Work or otherwise under this Agreement(whether in contract,tort, including negligence, product liability or otherwise)shall not exceed the total Fees paid by the City. THE ABOVE EXPRESS WARRANTY IS IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES AND CONDITIONS (EXPRESS AND IMPLIED)AND THOSE ARISING BY STATUTE OR OTHERWISE IN LAW OR FROM A COURSE OF DEALING OR USAGE OF TRADE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF MERCHANTABLE QUALITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. NO OTHER WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS EXPRESS OR IMPLIED ARE GIVEN. 4. LIMITATIONS OF REMEDIES AND DAMAGES. Subject to Section 16 hereof, Questica's entire liability and the City's exclusive remedy under this Agreement shall be i)if Questica is in breach of the Limited Warranty,to require Questica to replace any defective media or to correct any defects and make any modifications which are necessary to cause the Software to confirm in all material respects to the Documentation; or ii)the termination of this Agreement. In the event of any such termination, Questica shall not be liable in the aggregate for any damages which exceed the amount paid hereunder by the City to Questica as Software License Fees. In no event shall Questica be liable for indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages, even if advised of the possibility of such damages. 5. DISPUTE RESOLUTION/ARBITRATION. In the event of any dispute arising out of or relating to and/or in connection with this Agreement, the parties' project managers shall use every reasonable effort to resolve such dispute in good faith within ten (10) Business Days. If the project managers have failed to resolve the dispute within such time frame, then the dispute shall be escalated to the next escalation level.At each escalation level,the designated executives shall negotiate in good faith in an effort to resolve the dispute. For the purposes of this Agreement, a"Business Day"shall mean a day other than a Saturday, Sunday, or statutory holiday in Ontario. Questica License and Service Agreement Page 2 of 29 Escalation Level Questica Management City Management Level Period of Level Resolution Efforts First Level Project Manager Project Manager 10 Business Days Second Level Director- Finance Department Manager 10 Business Days Customer Success Third Level Vice President- Director of Finance or Treasurer 10 Business Days Professional Services If the above escalation periods have elapsed and there continues to be a dispute as to any matter herein, the matter in dispute may be referred to arbitration by a single arbitrator if mutually agreed by the parties in writing. In the event that the parties do not agree on arbitration or other form of dispute resolution, either party may pursue litigation in a court of appropriate jurisdiction in the State of Idaho (a) Except as provided above, or any other circumstance in which a party seeks an injunction or other equitable relief from the courts,Any dispute,claim or controversy arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach,termination, enforcement, interpretation or validity thereof, including the determination of the scope or applicability of this agreement to arbitrate, shall be determined by arbitration in Idaho before one arbitrator, including lawyers with 10 years of active practice in relevant information technology or intellectual property matters. The arbitration shall be administered by (i) JAMS pursuant to JAMS' Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures if City is U.S. based or if City is from outside the United States, in accordance with the JAMS International Arbitration Rules. Judgment on the Award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. This clause shall not preclude parties from seeking provisional remedies in aid of arbitration from a court of appropriate jurisdiction. The arbitrator shall not award punitive or exemplary damages, except where permitted by statute, and the parties waive any right to recover any such damages. The parties shall maintain the confidential nature of the arbitration proceeding and any award, except as may be necessary to prepare for or conduct the arbitration hearing on the merits, or except as may be necessary in connection with a court application for a preliminary remedy,a judicial challenge to an award or its enforcement,or unless otherwise required by law orjudicial decision. The parties acknowledge that this Agreement evidences a transaction involving interstate commerce. (b) Notwithstanding the provision in Section 5(a) with respect to applicable substantive law, any arbitration conducted pursuant to the terms of this Agreement shall be governed by the Federal Arbitration Act(9 U.S.C., Secs. 1-16). (c) In the event of any action or proceeding (including arbitration)brought in connection with this Agreement,the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and reasonable legal fees arising from such action or proceeding. 6. IRREPARABLE HARM. City acknowledges and agrees with Questica that the breach by it of any of the provisions of Sections 1-4, 9 or 10 of this Agreement would cause serious harm to Questica which could not adequately be compensated for in damages and in the event of a breach by City of any of such provisions, City understands that an injunction may be issued against it restraining it from any further breach of such provisions,but such actions shall not be construed so as to be in derogation of any other remedy which Questica may have in the event of such breach. 7. TERMS OF SERVICE. Terms, provisions, or conditions on any purchase order, acknowledgement, or other business form or writing that Customer may use in connection with the provision of Services (or software) by Questica will have no effect on the rights,duties,or obligations of the parties hereunder, regardless of any failure of Questica to object to such terms,provisions, or conditions. 8. FEES AND PAYMENTS FOR SERVICES 8.1 Payment. Payment is required in the currency quoted.Terms are Net-30 days from the date of receipt of invoice, and acceptance of the applicable milestone, as defined in the Project Payment Schedule. Only activities approved in a Scope of Work shall be invoiced. A mutually determined change control mechanism will be used to accommodate modifications to the Scope of Work. The City Project Manager will compare the invoice against the Project Payment Schedule in the Agreement for compliance. Upon approval that the work has been done and is in compliance with the Agreement, not to be unreasonably withheld,the City Project Manager will approve the pay request for processing. No compensation will be paid over the Not-to-Exceed amount without prior written approval by the City in the form of a Change Order. 8.2 Invoicing. City will provide Questica with a valid purchase order or alternative document reasonably acceptable to Questica.Questica will invoice City in accordance with the relevant Payment Schedule.. City is responsible for providing complete and accurate billing and contact information to Questica and notifying Questica of any changes to such information. 8.3 Suspension of Service and Acceleration. If any amount owing by City under this or any other agreement for Questica services is 30 or more days overdue, Questcia may, without limiting Questica's other rights and remedies, accelerate City unpaid fee obligations under such agreements so that all such obligations become immediately due and payable, Questica License and Service Agreement Page 3 of 29 and suspend Questica services to the City until such amounts are paid in full. Questica will give City at least 7 days prior notice that the City's account is overdue, in accordance with Section 11.1 (Manner of Giving Notice), before suspending services to the City. 8.4 Payments and Disputes.Questica shall not exercise rights under 8.3(Suspension of Service and Acceleration)if City are disputing the applicable charges reasonably and in good faith and are cooperating diligently to resolve the dispute. 9. PRODUCT MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT. For the first year of this Agreement, upon paying the City Fee and for each year thereafter, provided that City continues to pay the Product Maintenance and Support Fees in accordance with the fees set out in Appendix A, Questica shall provide the Maintenance and Technical Support Services(the"Services")for the software as outlined in Appendix B, if the City is not otherwise in breach of the provisions of this Agreement. If payment of the annual fee is not received by Questica before the first business day of the next additional year, Questica's obligation to provide the Services shall be terminated. Starting in year 4 and each year thereafter, an inflationary increase of 3%or CPI would apply,whichever is less. Questica may elect not to increase these fees in any year, however no such waiver shall preclude Questica from applying the escalation to any subsequent year or part of a year, and from making the subsequent application as if all subsequent escalation had been duly made over the period since the last increase. 10. IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES. Questica shall provide the professional service as defined in the Scope of Work("SOW"), Appendix C, in a professional manner, consistent with industry standards. Unless otherwise agreed upon by both parties, or as the result of a delay on the part of Questica,the obligation to provide professional services to the City expires the earlier of: 1)completion of the services described in the SOW 2) 12 months from the effective date of this Agreement. 11. ACCEPTANCE OF CUSTOM WORK. Within thirty(30) business days from the delivery of each individual Custom Work, the Customer/City shall, in its sole discretion, review the Product Customization and notify Questica whether it finds the Customizations satisfactory or unsatisfactory. If its determined that the Customizations are unsatisfactory, then it shall state in writing the reasons for its determination, including identifying any nonconformance with the City's specifications or expectations. Questica will promptly correct the deficiencies and reinstall the Customizations, and the approval procedure shall be reapplied until City finally declares the Customizations satisfactory. In the absence of a written response within 30 Business Days after the delivery of the Customizations or once the City has declared the Customizations satisfactory, the Customizations shall be considered `Accepted'. 12. RESERVED. 13. TRAVEL COSTS. Unless noted otherwise,this quotation does not include any travel, lodging,or on-site expenses. If such travel is required and subsequently authorized, City of Meridian's standard travel and per diem rates shall apply. Air Travel, Rental Car(with associated fuel and parking costs), and Lodging costs shall reimbursed at cost. Questica is not responsible for unpredictable(including Commercial Airline Travel)delays which may increase travel cost. 14. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. Each of the Parties shall use reasonable efforts (and, in any event, efforts that are no less than those used to protect its own confidential information)to protect from disclosure the confidential information only to its employees or agents who require access to it for the purpose of this Agreement or as otherwise provided in this Agreement. For the purposes of this Section, "confidential information" means all data information which when it is disclosed by a Party is designated as confidential and shall include the Work and any other proprietary and trade secrets of Questica to which access is obtained or granted hereunder to City; provided, however that confidential information shall not include any data or information which (a) is or becomes publicly available through no fault of the other Party, (b) is already in the possession of the Party prior to its receipt from the other Party, (c) is independently developed by the other Party, (d)is rightfully obtained by the other Party from a third party, (e)is disclosed with the written consent of the Party whose information it is,or(f)is disclosed pursuant to court order, or other legal compulsion. 15. NONDISCLOSURE OF AGREEMENT. Neither Party shall disclose the terms of this Agreement except as required by law or governmental regulation,without the other party's prior written consent, except that either Party may disclose the terms of this Agreement on a confidential basis to accountants, legal counsel, and financial advisors and lenders. 16. TERMINATION. This Agreement is effective as of the Effective Date and shall continue unless and until this Agreement is terminated as described herein. City may terminate this Agreement if Questica is declared insolvent, has assigned this Agreement in violation of the terms and conditions herein, or has made an assignment for the benefit of creditors. After a one-year period from the Effective Date,the City may terminate this Agreement at any time for any reason, or no reason, providing their financial obligations to Questica as detailed in Appendix A have been satisfied and paid in full. If the Agreement is terminated in this manner, no refund will be provided for any maintenance or support services paid in advance. In the event that City shall be in breach of any provisions of the Dispute Resolution/Arbitration Section outlined in this Agreement, Questica may provide notice of such breach to City,who shall have thirty(30)days from the date of such notice to cure or rectify the said breach. Should City fail to cure or rectify the said breach in the said thirty (30) days, Questica may terminate this Questica License and Service Agreement Page 4 of 29 Agreement. Such termination by Questica shall be in addition to and without prejudice to such rights and remedies as may be available to Questica including injunction and other equitable remedies. The provisions of Sections 1-3, 5, 14-18, 23, 24 and 26 herein shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 17. TRANSITION ASSISTANCE. In the event that City has entered into or enters into agreements with other contractors or government institutions for additional work related to the capital or operating Budgeting process, Questica agrees to reasonably cooperate with such other parties. Questica shall not commit any act which will unnecessarily interfere with the work performed by any such third parties. In the event of termination of this Agreement,Questica agrees that it shall provide reasonable assistance to,and shall not hinder a complete transition of the software functionality being terminated from Questica and its subcontractors to the City, or to any replacement provider designated by the City, without any material interruption of or material adverse impact on the services provided hereunder or any other services provided by third parties. Any additional services requested by City during the transition assistance period shall be provided by Questica at Questica's then-standard rates. 18. NOTICE. Any notice or other communication required or permitted to be given hereunder or for the purposes hereof to any party shall be in writing and shall be sufficiently given if delivered personally to such party, or if sent by prepaid registered mail or at such other address as the Party to whom such notice is to be given shall have last notified (in the manner provided herein) the Party giving such notice. Any notice delivered to the Party to whom it is addressed as provided herein shall be deemed to have been given and received on the day it is delivered at such address, provided that if such day is not a Business Day, then the notice shall be deemed to have been given and received on the Business Day next following such day. Any notice mailed to a Party shall be deemed to have been given and received on the fifth Business Day next following the date of its mailing provided that no postal strike or other postal service disruption is then in effect or comes into effect within four(4)Business Days after such mailing. 19. FORCE MAJEURE. Except as expressly provided otherwise in this agreement, dates and times by which any Party is required to render performance under this agreement or any schedule hereto shall be postponed automatically to the extent and for the period that such Party is prevented from meeting them by reason of any cause beyond its reasonable control (other than lack of funds), provided that the Party prevented from rendering performance notifies the other Party immediately and in detail of the commencement and nature of such cause and the probable consequences thereof, and provided further that such Party uses its reasonable efforts to render performance in a timely manner utilizing to such end all resources reasonably required in the circumstances, including obtaining supplies or services from other sources if same are reasonably available. 20. MEDIA RELEASES. Neither party shall use the name,trademark or logo of the other party without the prior written consent of the other party. Notwithstanding the foregoing,Questica may use the City's name and identify the City as a Questica client in advertising, marketing materials, press releases and similar materials. 21. USE OF SUBCONTRACTORS. All persons assigned by Questica to perform obligations under this Agreement shall be employees or authorized subcontractors of Questica and shall be fully qualified to work under this Agreement. Questica shall use commercially reasonable efforts to make available an adequate number of appropriately qualified personnel are employed and available to satisfy its obligations as outlined in this Agreement. 22. EXPORT CONTROL. The Software is intended for distribution only in the United States and Canada. City agrees that it will not directly or indirectly, export or re-export the Software (or portions thereof)to any country, person, entity or end user subject to U.S. or Canadian export restrictions. 23. GOVERNING LAW AND JURISDICTION. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Idaho and the federal laws of the United States of America without regard to the conflict of law provisions thereof. The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods will not apply to this Agreement. Subject to Section 5 above, the parties attorn to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of Idaho in respect this Agreement. 24. MISCELLANEOUS. This Agreement,including all Schedules and Exhibits attached hereto,is the entire agreement between City and Questica pertaining to City's right to use the Work and supersedes all prior or collateral oral or written representations or agreement related thereto. Except as otherwise provided herein, no term or provisions hereof shall be deemed waived and no breach excused unless such waiver or consent shall be in writing and signed by the Party to, or waiver of, a breach by the other, whether expressed or implied, shall not constitute a consent to,waiver of, or excuse for any other different or subsequent breach. 25. COOPERATIVE STATEMENT. Other government organizations and educational or health care institutions may elect to participate in this Agreement(piggyback)at their discretion, provided Questica also agrees to do so. 26. AUTHORIZED RESELLER STATUS; OPTION TO PURCHASE AFFILIATE PRODUCTS. Questica is a subsidiary of GTY Technology Holdings Inc. ("GTY") and an authorized reseller of products and services produced and provided by other subsidiaries of GTY (such subsidiaries, "Questica Affiliates"). These products and services include software-as-a-service technology for the procurement and vendor supplier sourcing industry, digital services and payment technology through a Questica License and Service Agreement Pag� Page 349 software-as-a-service platform, software solutions for grants management and indirect cost reimbursement and related implementation and consulting services,software tools to streamline permitting and licensing services,and additional web-based budgeting preparation, performance, management and data visualization solutions ("Affiliate Products"). Questica Affiliates include Bonfire Interactive Ltd., Bonfire Interactive US Ltd.,eCivis Inc.,CityBase, Inc., Open Counter Enterprise Inc.and Sherpa Government Solutions LLC. In addition to the products and services that are the subject of this Agreement, City has the option to purchase from either Questica, as an authorized reseller, or Questica Affiliates, Affiliate Products on terms and conditions, including pricing,to be agreed upon in writing by City and Questica or City and the applicable Questica Affiliate. 27. HEADINGS; SEVERABILITY. The headings and other captions in this Agreement are for convenience and reference only and are not to be construed in any way as additions or limitations of the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement. In the event that any provision hereof is found invalid or enforceable pursuant to judicial decree or decision, any such provision shall be deemed to apply only to the maximum extent permitted by law, and the remainder of this Agreement shall remain valid and enforceable according to its terms. Questica License and Service Agreement Page 6 of 29 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement. CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO(CITY) Per Robert E. Simison, Mayor Date 9-8-2020 1 have authority to bind the organization QUESTICA LTD. Per Name, Title Date I have authority to bind the organization Questica License and Service Agreement Page 7 of 29 APPENDIX A—Order Form Description Qty 1 Questica Budget Framework Includes 1 Seat(Operating, Salaries, & Capital) Additional Operating License Seats 54 Additional Salaries License Seats 9 Additional Capital License Seats 54 Unlimited Read-Only Licenses Included Allocations Included Statistical Ledger Included Performance Included Read only applies to Operating, Salaries, and Capital modules only Total Software(One-Time Cost): $112,892 Total Annual Maintenance and Support(Due Annually): $28,223 Professional Services(Per Statement of Work) Design,Analysis&Configuration Included Project Management Included Training Included Integrations Included Customizations Included Custom Reports Included IT Services Included Total Professional Services (One-Time Cost): $160,200 Travel expenses, if applicable Not Included Total Travel Expenses: $ - Discount, including year 1 maintenance - 50,803 Grand Total Year 1 $250,512 Questica License and Service Agreement Page 8 of 29 F.H. Black/CaseWare Order Form Description User Count Standard Operating Budget Book 1 Includes: Questica Budget Book remote implementation • 32 hours of initial Train-the-trainer training (CaseWare Champion)in FHB (F. H. Black&Company Incorporated)standard online training sessions. • Implementation and configuration of CaseWare's standard Budget Book library: o Review Questica setup, account groups&cost centers and configuration of CaseWare to support these structures. o Configure standard content and identify requested modifications to: ■ Fonts, indents&margins ■ Ordering of documents o Initial configuration of standard content with client standards o Configuration &testing of Questica Integration o Guidance to client on their tasks (inserting schedules, pictures, embedded PDFs etc.) 0 30 hours of Aftercare annually. Typically, clients use Aftercare to work with FHB consultants to install updated versions of software,tweak the style sheets to change the presentation of their data, re-configure existing content, group new G/L accounts, modify groupings, address reorganizations, and other common tasks.Aftercare does not cover customization of existing content or development of new custom content that the Client may wish to add. As part of this engagement,the Client will: • Provide on-going guidance to the FHB team respecting presentation and disclosure requirements, general ledger structure, year-end processes, etc., as necessary. • Develop and submit to the FHB team Questica Ad-Hoc Reports that contain all automated values and narrative to be included in the standard budget book content. • Should Questica Budget groupings be insufficient for Budget Book requirements, group all accounts by Object and by Function as recommended/advised by FHB within a CaseWare Working Papers file. • Reconcile the financial data within the Working Papers file as necessary to agree with previously published reports. This process may also require posting adjusting journal entries within CaseWare. If this is necessary,the client will be responsible for this work. • Provide a mapping/group legend for each value in the statements, schedules and notes. • Complete miscellaneous tasks as may be assigned during the implementation including the configuration of any work papers deemed necessary to automate complex values. • Review, test and sign-off on all FHB work within five(5)business days of receipt of FHB's work. • Attend CaseWare Working Papers and Financials Template courses as deemed necessary by FHB. The cost of this training is included in the annual fee for a single user(Champion)only. Annual Cost $15,250 CIP Add-On $5,350 Annual Cost Standard Operating and CIP Budget Book $20,600 Questica License and Service Agreement Page 9 of 29 Recommended contingency for customization While the CaseWare solution is highly configurable,there may be some items, such as a list of transfer payment recipients that may require customization,which cannot be accurately estimated without a discussion with F.H. Black consultants. F.H. Black would recommend a contingency of$1,500 for the first such schedule with an incremental charge for each similar instance, dependent on the availability and standardization of the required information by department. Pricing Notes • All pricing in US dollars • Applicable Taxes Extra • Terms of Payment: o Initial Software Installation: ■ Payment due as per Milestone 4 and 4.1 in the following Project Payment Schedule o Annual Maintenance&Support: • Questica Budget Maintenance($28,223)due 365 days from Contract Effective Date and annually thereafter ■ CaseWare annual subscription ($20,600)due 365 days from Contract Effective Date and annually thereafter o Professional Services: ■ Payment due as per the following Project Payment Schedule Milestone# Deliverable Description Acceptance Criteria Amount Project managers for both the City and Completion of kick- Questica will conduct a off meeting project kick-off with all between Questica MS1 Project Kickoff vested City employees and City staff $13,770.00 Compile configuration requirements for City Project Configuration Requirements Questica Budget Manager signed-off MS2 Documentation (CRD) Software CRD $13,770.00 Completion and acceptance of City and Questica will implementation establish an plan by all involved MS3 Implementation Plan implementation plan Project Managers $13,770.00 Questica to install Completion and budget software on City acceptance of MS4 Software Installation network software install $90,312.00 Questica to install Completion and Software Installation- Budget CaseWare Software on acceptance of MS4.1 Book City network software install $20,600.00 Questica will establish proper mapping/migration/ City Project integration of City data Manager signed-off Data with Questica Budget of data migration/ MS5 mapping/Migration/Integration Software integration $34,425.00 Questica License and Service Agreement Page 10 of 29 City Project Manager signed-off Historical budget and of historical budget MS6 Historical Data Validation actual data validation and actual data $20,655.00 Formal acceptance that all agreed upon training that has been provided Questica to provide all by Questica to the agreed upon training to identified City MS7 Training identified City staff employees $20,655.00 The availability of Questica Budget Software for live launch meeting all Questica Budget requirements Software available for identified in the MS8 Launch/Go-Live launch SOW $13,770.00 Retainage for total contract price to be Completion of all released upon final previous acceptance of Questica Milestones per MS9 Retainage Budget Software Payment Schedule $6,885.00 Development of custom City Project reports as defined by Manager signed-off MS10* Custom Reports the City on custom reports $22,500.00 TOTAL $271,112.00 • Above Professional Services subject to the corresponding Scope of Work. • MS10 to be invoiced on a Time and Materials basis. • Additional Professional Services to be provided at a rate of$225/Hour. Questica License and Service Agreement Page 11 of 29 Item#21. APPENDIX B—Maintenance and Technical Support Services (A) Product Maintenance. On an as-available basis, Questica will provide enhancements, modifications or upgrades to the Software as Questica may from time to time make available to its Citys generally ("Updates") but excluding any New Product (a "New Product" being a solution which, in Questica's determination and subject to general industry standards, does not replace the Software licensed hereunder.) Updates do not include: I. Platform extensions including product extensions to (i) different hardware platforms; (ii) different windowing system platforms; (iii)different operating system platforms II. New applications III. Services associated with the application or installation of Updates Installation of Updates is the responsibility of the City. If requested, Questica will provide assistance in the installation of Updates at its then current rates, including the testing of any site-specific customizations. Questica will provide a quote for any required rework associated with customizations resulting from the upgrade. (B) Technical Support Services. Questica will provide phone and e-mail based technical support of a reasonable nature as described herein. A technical support incident or problem is a single user defined problem seeking resolution. It must be related to the original intent and design of the software. Technical Support Services include the support of Questica supplied integrations that have not been modified by the City. Each Technical Support Service incident is deemed closed when a remedy, workaround, or recommendation for the installation of a current maintenance release has been offered, and a commercially reasonable effort has been made to restore operation to the original intent and design of the Software. Technical Support Service does not include: I. Custom programming services; II. On-site support; III. Software installation or re-installation; IV. Update Installation, or data and report updates required to support Updates; V. City developed interfaces,API interactions, or customizations; VI. City developed reports; VII. End-User training or re-training; VIII.City hardware issues; IX. Correction of data issues derived from user error or Software misuse; X. Changes to Questica developed custom reports or Permitted Customizations (including Questica supplied custom business rules or customized user screens)that are outside the scope of the accepted specification, scope of work, or authorized change requests; XI. Corrections to Questica developed custom reports or Permitted Customizations beyond six (6) months from the date of delivery(the upgrade protection period); and XII. Changes to integration functionality made necessary due to City server modifications/replacement,or changes by upgrades or changes to the integrated financial system software or hardware. Questica may at its sole discretion, periodically make reasonable modifications or changes to the Technical Support Services and/or Product Maintenance Services provided. City is responsible for all hardware, operating systems, network setup, network maintenance and setup, SSRS maintenance, SQL-Server database maintenance, IIS maintenance and setup, backup strategy, disaster recovery strategy and the use of any file access control systems required in the support of the Software. City may be required to grant Questica certain limited access rights to City's computer systems in order to render Technical Support Services. City is responsible for ensuring that its personnel have sufficient training to attain and maintain competence in the operation of the Software. Technical Support Service is available at no cost through Questica's normal business hours, Monday through Friday, 8:OOam through 8:OOpm, Eastern Standard Time on Business Days. Extended coverage is available for an additional fee. Questica License and Service Agreement Page 12 of 29 Item#21. APPENDIX C—Scope of Work(SOW) Scope of Work Questica Budget Implementation for City of Meridian 1. Revision History Date Authors Notes/Changes 1 2. Scope of Work In the Scope of Work tables, entries in the column headed "Scope of Work" are defined as follows: In scope The task or function is within the scope of work to be undertaken by Questica professional services. Customer The task or function is not within the scope of work to be undertaken by Questica task professional services, but will be undertaken by The Customer, with such help from Questica as is detailed in the item description. Not in The task or function is not within the scope of work to be undertaken by Questica scope professional services, nor will it be undertaken by The Customer. Questica and The Customer agree that the implementation of Questica Budget is a shared responsibility and that neither party is in total command of all the resources necessary to achieve objectives within mutually agreed timeframes. However, both Questica and The Customer agree that they will employ their best efforts to complete their agreed tasks on a timely basis. Neither Questica nor The Customer is expected to have resources available to mitigate timeframe slippage caused by the other party, and neither shall have an obligation to do so. The fixed price cost includes overhead of project management and analysis by Questica until the implementation services are delivered or 36 weeks contiguous from project kick-off, whichever occurs first. Where delays are not on the part of Questica, additional project management and consulting beyond this 36 week limit may be billable at Questica's standard services rate. Should the customer put the project on hold or cause work to be repeated or the project to be restarted, then a project change order will be required to cover restart, rework, rescheduling and retraining. Initial Data Load "Data import", "import workbooks", "import configuration", and "initial data load" are synonymous terms referring to the initial migration of data from The Customer's existing systems into Questica. Where this initial data load is to be performed by Questica, the data shall be returned to Questica in Excel workbooks. Questica's Project Manager will provide blank workbooks as an output of the initial discovery meetings. They will be adapted from standard templates to use The Customer's terminology and to incorporate all elements of The Customer's chart of accounts, other data entities, and columns within those data entities. The Questica Budget system is a relational database built on a standard data model. Using the system's user interface, this data model may be enhanced to mirror The Customer's data structures, notably the chart of accounts that is unique to The Customer's institution. While all of the standard tables ('entities') must be retained, the following points are held to be true: Questica License and Service Agreement Page Page 357 Item#21. •Any of the standard entities may be renamed to match The Customer's terminology; • Out-of-the-box entities may be ignored, or in some cases filled with place-holder data, if not useful; • There is a defined, immutable, relationship between certain entities-for example Costing Centers (Operating)and Projects (Capital) roll up to a single Department, each in turn rolling up to a single Division; • The GL Account/Account Category, Division/Department, Fund Category/Fund, and Asset Category/Asset Type structures must be consistent across all years and across the modules (Operating, Salaries, Capital and Performance); • GL Account Categories must be categorized as containing either a revenue or expenditure accounts (accommodation is made for other account types in the Financial Statements module); • Questica Budget enacts data integrity through the use of relational data structures. Data structures which do not follow accepted data principles (for example, re-using GL Accounts/Object Codes to mean different things to different Departments)can typically be accommodated but is not guaranteed and such accommodation can extend the import timeframe; •A list of the standard entities and their relationship is available upon request. The Customer will resolve any inconsistencies in the structures prior to providing them to Questica for import to Questica Budget. Where import data meets these requirements, Questica will populate the Questica Budget database within 10 business days of receiving the import workbooks. Data returned to Questica which violates Questica Budget's data integrity rules will extend this timeframe. Integrations "Integration" as used in this Scope of Work refers to the copying of data to and from systems external to Questica Budget. Questica shall be responsible for providing the software interface into Questica Budget (including data transformations as described by The Customer) and the operational infrastructure required to manage the integration. The customer agrees to provide Questica with assistance in understanding the nature and location of the data to be integrated and, where required, create or cause to be created all necessary sources of data including database queries, delimited files, and/or web services. Data elements being copied into Questica will be imported provided that the element can be unambiguously matched to a pre-existing record (for example costing center, fund and GL account). An exception report is provided for data elements which cannot be thus matched. Integrations will not create accounts, or segments of the account, where no such account exists in Questica. While it is likely that Questica can accommodate additional chart of account segments ("chart fields"), and will try to do so, the general ledger integrations are designed to be at the division, department, cost center/project, fund and GL object level. Unless explicitly stated in this Scope of Work, Questica is not obligated to support the integration of additional chart of account segments. Questica shall accommodate reasonable requests for mapping chart fields, to accommodate situations such as legacy account structures, however such mappings are not guaranteed, and complex and arbitrary mappings are not in-scope. Unless specifically listed as a customization, Questica integrations do not include the synchronization of chart of account strings, segments, or combinations; which is to say that the list of funds, GL accounts, costing centers, and projects, etc. is not automatically updated from the general ledger or other external system. Customizations Customizations include custom business rules, modifiers, user interface (grids, forms, etc.), non- standard integrations, hand-crafted reports, and ad hoc entities. They are all detailed in section "2.9. Customizations" of this Scope of Work document. Sections prior to"2.9. Customizations" detail the delivery of standard product functionality and services. Questica License and Service Agreement Page Page 358 Item#21. 2.1. Questica Budget Configuration & Shared Components Functional Area Description . . . Work Implementation Questica will configure production and test versions of In scope Hosting Questica Budget during the implementation period. Production Hosting The Customer will provide a server operating environment as Customer follows: task • Microsoft®Windows Server®: supported versions -2012R2, 2016 (Standard or Enterprise editions, 32 &64 bit); • Microsoft Internet Information Server(IIS): component of installed Windows server; • Microsoft SQL Server®and SSRS (SQL Server Reporting Services): supported versions -2014, 2016, or 2017 (Standard or Enterprise); • Microsoft .NET Runtime 4.6 installed; • Microsoft ASP.NET server extensions installed. To ensure the best experience of Questica Budget, the hosting web server must be permitted to issue outgoing HTTPS requests (port 443)to xxx.questica.com. This will allow for updated seat licenses and recommended application improvements covering functionality, performance, and security. The Customer will provide user workstation environments as follows: •A web browser: supported browsers - Internet Explorer 11 or newer, Microsoft Edge, Firefox latest release, Chrome latest release; • Microsoft .NET Runtime 4.6 installed; • Microsoft Excel®2007 or newer(if spreadsheet export/import feature is required, and/or saving reports as Excel is required); • Microsoft Word®2007 or newer(if scheduled reporting and/or saving reports as Word is required); •A ClickOnce browser extension (if self-serve report authoring is required from browsers other than Internet Explorer or Edge), or Microsoft's freely available desktop version of Report Builder installed. Questica implementation &technical staff will be granted remote access and permissions to the production system's server(s)for the purpose of system installation and implementation. Additionally, The Customer will provide a technical contact with the authority and proficiency to assist Questica in the configuration of Questica Budget While Questica imposes no limit to the number of instances of Questica Budget installed, Questica's professional services team will install, or assist with the installation of, no more than 2 instances of the system on The Customer's servers. Project Questica will assign (upon City approval, not to be In scope Management unreasonably withheld) a Project Manager/Analyst ("PM")to lead this implementation on Questica's behalf. The role and responsibility of the PM is to ensure that the product is implemented according to this Scope of Work and to carry out the tasks detailed in sub-section "2.10.1. Questica Project Management Responsibilities" of this Scope of Work. Questica License and Service Agreement Page Page 359 Item#21. The PM will hold no more than 1 standing weekly status meeting, but is available via email and telephone for ad-hoc contact as needed. On-Site PM Visits All work with the Questica project lead(s)will be carried out Not in off-site and contact will be via normal telecommunication scope channels. Application Level Determine how and when to use the various security levels Customer Security available within Questica Budget, enter users and assign them task to groups and roles. Questica will assist with this task until such time as administrators have received training in the security component of Questica Budget. Single Sign-On Configure Questica Budget to use The Customer's existing In scope SAML (Azure AD)Authentication for user Iogon. Import Configuration ... Import Master Configuration and data import of the following Questica In scope Configuration Data standard data structures, using data supplied by The Customer in Excel®workbooks provided by Questica: • Division/Department hierarchy; • Fund Categories and Funds; •Account Categories and Expense and Revenue GL Accounts • Statistical Account Categories and Statistical Accounts • Performance Measure Units Analytics ... Standard Reports Provision of Questica Budget's standard reports. These In scope reports are provided as-is and may not fully address The Customer's specific reporting requirements. Administrator Questica's reporting infrastructure allows users to create ad In scope Authored hoc views which can be used as datasets when using Report Reporting Builder 3.0 for administrator authored reporting ; as the data source for dashboard widgets; and as part of the ad-hoc analytics interface. Each ad hoc view requires a base "entity" (database table), which can be one of Questica's native data entities; a user configured entity; or a custom built"report entity"which consolidates the data from multiple entities and presents it to the ad hoc view as a single entity ready to report on. Questica will be provisioned with a set of useful report entities and sample ad hoc views. Questica License and Service Agreement Page Page 360 Item#21. 2.2. Operating Module The Questica Budget Operating module is included in this installation. Functional • •n Scope of Work Optional Features The following optional add-ins offer functionality necessary for very specific ... budgeting activities, as described. An additional license cost is associated with each add-in. Staff Planning The Staff Planning add-in is supplementary to the Salaries Not in Add-in module. It is used to build budget based on shift plans for full scope shift coverage, for example staffing a hospital ward, rather than by head-count/FTEs. This add-in accounts for non- productive time and auto-allocates additional and partial Positions to ensure full shift coverage within costing Centers. Configuration ... Import Costing Configuration and data import of standard Questica Operating In scope Centers data structures, using data supplied by The Customer in Excel®workbooks provided by Questica. At a minimum, the files will contain the data necessary to:- Create Costing Centers (for each historical and current/future budget year to be loaded);-Add Costing Centers to Departments consistent with, and shared by, the Capital budget module;-Associate Costing Centers with Funds;- Define Budget Promotion Stages. Initial Data Load Import Initial Import the current/future budget, with 1 years of future In scope Budget forecast data from data import workbooks: • Create dollar budget line items with GL Accounts ... at the Costing Center level. Questica will carry out a second import of the current/future budget if required. This accommodates an initial data load at the start of the implementation and a refresh prior to going live. Import Historic Import 2 prior years' Operating budgets from data import In scope Budgets workbooks. All prior years must have a chart of account structure that is the same, or a subset of, the initial budget. Only the amended OR the approved budget will be imported in each of these prior years, but not both. Import Actuals Import Operating actuals transactions from data import Customer Transactions workbooks. If not in scope then The Customer can add their task historical data manually, or using Questica Budget's spreadsheet import feature, or use the automated integration once that has been configured. Import Initial Import the current/future Operating statistical budget from data Customer Statistical Budget import workbooks: task • Create statistical budget lines items with Statistical Accounts ... at the Costing Center level. If not in scope then The Questica License and Service Agreement Page Page 361 Item#21. Customer will add their budget data manually or using Questica Budget's spreadsheet import feature. Import Historic Import prior years' Operating statistical budgets from data Customer Statistical Budgets import workbooks. If not in scope then The Customer can add task their historical data manually or using Questica Budget's spreadsheet import feature. Import Statistical Import Operating statistical actuals transactions from data Customer Actuals import workbooks. If not in scope then The Customer can add task Transactions their historical data manually, or using Questica Budget's spreadsheet import feature. Integration ... Budget Export Automated facility to transfer the Operating module budget In scope data from Questica Budget to The Customer's general ledger at the approved budget object/costing center level on an annual or other basis when invoked by a user.Note that this scope item is in addition to the built-in budget export, which will create a CSV file using the configured account structure suitable for import into most general ledger systems.ln addition to the limitations noted in the general Integrations section of this Scope of Work; and notwithstanding items expressly referenced in the "Customizations" section of this Scope of Work; and/or other communications between Questica and The Customer to the contrary, standard limitations of this integration include, but are not limited to, the following points:- Questica will create no more than 1 custom export configuration of the approved budget;- No custom user interface will be created for the selective export of sections of the budget;- Exports the entire budget (does not support the export of changes since the last export, such as amendments, which is a separate integration, see "Amended Budget Export" below). Amended Budget Automated facility to transfer individual approved amendments In scope Export to the Operating module budget data, from Questica Budget to The Customer's general ledger, or the other direction as required. This interface is required only in the case where The Customer requires the amended budget to be synchronized between the two systems and where the general ledger cannot be updated by re-running the full export provided in the item in the"Budget Export" item above. Notwithstanding items expressly referenced in the "Customizations"section of this Scope of Work; and/or other communications between Questica and The Customer to the contrary, standard limitations of this integration include, but are not limited to, the following points: • Questica will create no more than 1 custom export configuration of the budget amendments; • No custom user interface will be created for the selective export amendments; •Will be written to export either individual amendments as created or all amendments since the last export, as determined to be the best use-case, but not both options. Questica License and Service Agreement Page Page 362 Item#21. Actuals Import Automated facility to transfer actual data from The Customer's In scope Other general ledger to the Questica Budget Operating module at a transaction level on a daily basis when automatically scheduled; and/or on demand. Note that this scope item is in addition to the built-in actuals import which is able to read a CSV file, provided it conforms to some simple formatting requirements and the configured account structure. Notwithstanding items expressly referenced in the "Customizations"section of this Scope of Work; and/or other communications between Questica and The Customer to the contrary, standard limitations of this integration include, but are not limited to, the following points: • Questica will create no more than 1 import configuration of the actual costs transactions; •A user interface will be created for the selective import of sections of the budget within two date ranges, no other criteria will be available; • Imports only actuals transactions, which is to say that it cannot be used to amend the budget. 2.3. Salaries Module The Questica Budget Salaries module is included in this installation. Functional • •n Scope of Work Initial Data Load Configuration and data import of standard Questica Salaries data structures, ... using data supplied by The Customer in Excel®workbooks provided by Questica. At a minimum, the files will contain the data necessary to: • Create positions; • Create salary grades; • Create salary grade steps; • Create modifiers (benefits); • Create employees; •Allocate employees to positions; •Allocate positions to costing centers. For the purpose of the above, the definitions of positions, Salary grades, Salary grade steps, employees and modifiers shall be those found in the Questica Budget Salaries manual. The relationships between them shall be those currently supported by Questica Budget and described in the Questica Budget Operating Manual. Questica will carry out a second import of the Salaries module data if required. This accommodates an initial data load at the start of the implementation and a refresh prior to going live with the Salaries module. Import Positions & Import from data import workbooks. In scope Employees Import Grades & Import from data import workbooks. In scope Scales Questica License and Service Agreement Page Page 363 Item#21. Create Benefits Create "modifiers"to generate supplementary personnel costs Customer (Modifiers) such as benefits, allowances, and insurance. If not in scope task then The Customer can enter modifiers manually. Note that modifiers are not simple 2 dimensional data that can be represented in a spreadsheet. It is not possible to load modifiers in bulk from Excel®workbooks. Import Import from data import workbooks. In scope Position/Costing Center Allocations Integration ... Payroll Actuals Automated facility to transfer actual payroll transactions at the Not in Import employee/position detail level from The Customer's payroll scope system to the Questica Budget Operating module; automatically scheduled, and/or on demand. HR Data Sync. Automated facility to synchronize Salaries data between In scope Questica Budget and The Customer's Sage HRMS HR system. Questica shall be responsible for providing the software interface into Questica Budget and the operational infrastructure required to manage the integration. The Customer shall be responsible for making available the data to be exported from the Sage HRMS system, either in CSV formatted files or by ensuring that the standard Sage HRMS to Questica Budget integration component is available for extracting data from and updating data within that system. This will be through the export and import of structured files or by providing database interfaces (stored procedures and queries). This integration synchronizes:- New, deleted and updated employees;- New, deleted and updated positions;- Changes in employee-position relationships;- Changes in position-costing center relationships. The integration of profiles (bargaining units), grades, steps, pay scales and benefits shall not be included unless expressly referred to in the "Customizations" section of this Scope of Work. Notwithstanding responses to Requests for Proposals or other communications between Questica and The Customer, the integration of custom chart field items is not included unless expressly set out in the "Customizations"section of this Scope of Work. 2.4. Capital Module The Questica Budget Capital module is included in this installation. Functional • •n Scope of Work Configuration ... Import Projects Configuration and data import of standard Questica Capital In scope data structures, using data supplied by The Customer in Excel®workbooks provided by Questica. At a minimum, the files will contain the data necessary to: • Create Projects (including closed projects where historical Questica License and Service Agreement Page Page 364 Item#21. budget is to be loaded); •Add Projects to Departments consistent with, and shared by, the Operating budget module; • Define Project Promotion Stages. The configuration data may optionally contain data necessary to: • Define Asset Categories &Asset Types; • Define Project Regions; • Define a Single Set of Project Ranking Metrics. Initial Data Load Import Initial Import the current/future Capital budget, with 5 years of future In scope Budget forecast data from data import workbooks:- Create dollar budget line items with GL Accounts and Funds... at the Project Ievel.Questica will carry out a second import of the current/future budget if required. This accommodates an initial data load at the start of the implementation and a refresh prior to going live. Import Historic Import 5 prior years' Capital budgets from data import In scope Budgets workbooks. All prior years must have a chart of account structure that is the same, or a subset of, the initial budget. Only the amended OR the approved budget will be imported in each of these prior years, but not both. Import Actuals Import Capital actuals transactions from data import Customer Transactions workbooks. If not in scope then The Customer can add their task historical data manually, or using Questica Budget's spreadsheet import feature, or use the automated integration once that has been configured. Import Initial Import the current/future Capital statistical budget from data Customer Statistical Budget import workbooks: task • Create statistical budget lines items with Statistical Accounts ... at the Costing visualization level. If not in scope then The Customer will add their budget data manually or using Questica Budget's spreadsheet import feature. Import Historic Import prior years' Capital statistical budgets from data import Customer Statistical Budgets workbooks. If not in scope then The Customer can add their task historical data manually or using Questica Budget's spreadsheet import feature. Import Statistical Import Capital statistical actuals transactions from data import Customer Actuals workbooks. If not in scope then The Customer can add their task Transactions historical data manually, or using Questica Budget's spreadsheet import feature. Integration ... Budget Export Automated facility to transfer the Capital module budget data In scope from Questica Budget to The Customer's general ledger or project ledger the approved budget object/costing Summarized level on an annual or other basis when invoked by a user.Note that this scope item is in addition to the built-in budget export, which will create a CSV file using the configured account structure suitable for import into most general ledger s stems.ln addition to the limitations noted in Questica License and Service Agreement Page Page 365 Item#21. the general Integrations section of this Scope of Work; and notwithstanding items expressly referenced in the "Customizations"section of this Scope of Work; and/or other communications between Questica and The Customer to the contrary, standard limitations of this integration include, but are not limited to, the following points:• Questica will create no more than 1 custom export configuration of the approved budget;• No custom user interface will be created for the selective export of sections of the budget;• Exports the entire budget (does not support the export of changes since the last export, such as amendments, which is a separate integration, see "Amended Budget Export" below). Amended Budget Automated facility to transfer individual approved amendments In scope Export to the Capital module budget data, from Questica Budget to The Customer's general ledger(or project ledger), or the other direction as required. This interface is required only in the case where The Customer requires the amended budget to be synchronized between the two systems and where the target system cannot be updated by re-running the full export provided in the item in the "Budget Export" item above. Notwithstanding items expressly referenced in the "Customizations"section of this Scope of Work; and/or other communications between Questica and The Customer to the contrary, standard limitations of this integration include, but are not limited to, the following points: • Questica will create no more than 1 custom export configuration of the budget amendments; • No custom user interface will be created for the selective export amendments; •Will be written to export either individual amendments as created or all amendments since the last export, as determined to be the best use-case, but not both options. Actuals Import Automated facility to transfer actual data from The Customer's In scope general ledger or project ledger to the Questica Budget Capital module at a transaction level on a daily basis when automatically scheduled; and/or on demand. Note that this scope item is in addition to the built-in actuals import which is able to read a CSV file, provided it conforms to some simple formatting requirements and the configured account structure. Notwithstanding items expressly referenced in the "Customizations" section of this Scope of Work; and/or other communications between Questica and The Customer to the contrary, standard limitations of this integration include, but are not limited to, the following points: • Questica will create no more than 1 import configuration of the actual costs transactions; •A user interface will be created for the selective import of sections of the budget within two date ranges, no other criteria will be available; • Imports only actuals transactions, which is to say that it cannot be used to amend the budget. Statistical Budget Automated facility to transfer the Capital statistical budget data Not in Export from Questica Budget to a single target system at the scope Questica License and Service Agreement Page Page 366 Item#21. approved budget object/costing Visualization level on an annual or other basis when invoked by a user. Amended Automated facility to transfer individual approved amendments Not in Statistical Budget to the Capital statistical budget data, from Questica Budget to scope Export a single target system, or the other direction as required. This interface is required only in the case where The Customer requires the amended statistical budget to be Summarize between the two systems and where the target system cannot be updated by re-running the full export provided in the item in item above. Statistical Actuals Automated facility to transfer actual data into Questica Budget Not in Import Capital statistical module at a transaction level on a daily basis scope when automatically scheduled; and/or on demand. 2.5. Financial Statements The Questica Budget Financial Statements optional feature is not included in this implementation. 2.6. Performance Measures The Questica Budget Performance Measures module is included in this installation. Note that read-only licences are not available for Questica's Performance Measures module, as such the purchase of an 'Unlimited Read Only' licence does not grant read-only users access to this module. ScopeFunctional Area Description . Work Configuration ... Measure Configuration of Performance Measures Categories and Units, Customer Categories and establishing those lookup values within the system. If not in task Units scope then The Customer will leverage Questica provided training to determine how to configure these. Import Data ... Initial Performance Measures imported into Questica Budget from Excel® files ("workbooks') Measures If not in scope then The Customer will leverage Questica Customer provided training to determine how to enter Performance task Measures into the system. Note that Measures are not simple 2 dimensional data that can be represented in a spreadsheet. It is not possible to create Measures in bulk from Excel®workbooks." Scorecards If not in scope then The Customer will leverage Questica Customer provided training to determine how to configure Performance task Measure Scorecards within the system. Integration ... If automated import of Measure Actuals is required then a custom interface can be specified in the "Customizations"section of this Scope of Work. Questica License and Service Agreement Page Page 367 Item#21. 2.7. OpenBook Questica's "OpenBook" cloud service for data transparency is not included in this implementation. 2.8. Training ScopeFunctional Area Description . Work Questica maintains a substantial set of training courseware online in the Questica Academy. All relevant material on the Academy is available to all users during and after the implementation. Questica's standard training model is to train the trainers and/or advanced users within the Customer's organization in all aspects of the application related to the system delivered. Training is a blend of online courseware and "live"training, either in a classroom or via a web conference. In the case of video training the project manager will field any outstanding questions. Where a specialist trainer is "In Scope"below this might be as a follow-up to a video or presentation of the entire course. Questica's project manager will help determine at which point in the implementation the delivery of training is most appropriate. The Customer may prefer to receive some or all of their training in the early stages of the implementation, in the knowledge that such training will need to be carried out using a generic training database. Alternatively the Customer may choose to wait until the implementation is substantially complete in order to be trained on their own instance of Questica. Having received train-the-trainer training, the Customer is responsible for training the "end users'; except where explicitly included in scope (below). Note that Questica offers, as a service, the creation of online courseware for end users that is tailored to the Customer's system and processes. The following sections detail the proposed training. The project manager and the Customer will determine the final training plan and topics may be swapped to receive more of one and less of another, provided that the total amount of training does not exceed the proposed plan. Training: Training in Questica Budget administration is delivered via a In scope Administration series of training courseware, such as pre-recorded videos. This will be delivered in one training session. Training: Training in the use of ad hoc views and dashboards is In scope Administrator delivered via pre-recorded training videos. Questica also Authored provides instructional videos on the use of the Report Builder Reporting 3.0 report authoring tool but recommend that users make use of the many online resources to gain expertise in this tool. This will be delivered in one training session. Train-the-Trainer: "Train the trainer"training in the use of Questica Budget's In scope Operating Operating module. Up to 2 training sessions will be held on this topic. Train-the-User: "Train the user"training in the use of Questica Budget's Customer Operating Operating module. task Train-the-Trainer: "Train the trainer"training in the use of Questica Budget's Staff Not in Staff Planning Planning feature. scope Questica License and Service Agreement Page Page 368 Item#21. Train-the-User: "Train the user"training in the use of Questica Budget's Staff Not in Staff Planning Planning feature. scope Train-the-Trainer: "Train the trainer"training in the use of Questica Budget's In scope Salaries Salaries module. This will be delivered in one training session. Train-the-User: "Train the user"training in the use of Questica Budget's Customer Salaries Salaries module. task Train-the-Trainer: "Train the trainer"training in the use of Questica Budget's In scope Capital Capital module. Up to 2 training sessions will be held on this topic. Train-the-User: "Train the user"training in the use of Questica Budget's Customer Capital Capital module. task Train-the-Trainer: "Train the trainer"training in the use of Questica Budget's In scope Performance Performance module is via pre-recorded training video. In Measures addition, one training session. will be held on this topic. Train-the-User: "Train the user"training in the use of Questica Budget's Customer Performance Performance module. task Measures Custom Custom Instructional on-boarding videos and el-earning Not in Instructional courseware for end-users, demonstrating general system scope Videos/eLearning usage and how to enter and query budgets according to the Courseware customer's process. On Site ... On-Site Training Not in Visits scope 2.9. Customizations 2.9.1. Custom Business Rules (CBRs), Modifiers, User Interface The following customizations are included within this Scope of Work: • Police Step Plan • Fire Union Compensation Schedule Customizations not listed here can be accommodated upon receipt and acceptance of a change order, which will include a specification and may include an estimate for the work to be charged on a time & materials basis at the applicable rate. 2.9.2. Custom Reports, Custom Ad Hoc Entities and Custom Dashboards Questica License and Service Agreement Page Page 369 Item#21. This project includes 100 hours identified exclusively for the development of the following reports and/or ad hoc entities. Work on these shall not exceed 100 hours except on receipt and acceptance of a change order, which may require additional funding: • Report: Placeholder for Custom Reporting *** Notes: Placeholder for Custom Reporting Custom reporting and dashboard requirements not listed here can be accommodated upon receipt and acceptance of a change order,which will include a specification and may include an estimate for the work to be charged on a time & materials basis at the applicable rate. 2.9.3. Specifications Before Questica undertakes any customizations described herein, as well as integrations with other systems, and data imports, The Customer and Questica shall prepare and sign-off on the detailed specifications ("Specifications")for the work to be performed. 2.9.4. Change Orders Any changes to the agreed specifications, including changes requested by The Customer within the warranty period, shall be the subject of a new change order and the work to be carried out thereunder shall be separately quoted, agreed, and billed and shall not be included as part of this Scope of Work. 2.9.5. Warranty Once completed the custom work shall be warranted by Questica in accordance with the "Technical Support Services"section of the Questica Software License Agreement. 2.10. Project Management 2.10.1. Questica Project Management Responsibilities 1. Coordinating the development of the project plan in consultation with The Customer project manager and team members. 2. The timely delivery of items identified as "In scope"within this SoW. 3. Ensuring that members of The Customer staff are sufficiently educated in the Questica Budget application to understand the implications of initial design decisions. 4. Providing The Customer with timely and detailed descriptions of the items identified as "Customer task"within this SoW. 5. Advising The Customer of expected completion dates for items identified as"Customer task"within this SoW. 6. Advising The Customer of the impact on the expected delivery dates of"Customer task" items when prerequisite customer tasks, such as the completion of data import templates or approval of report specifications, are advanced or delayed. 7. Monitoring the progress of the project and advising The Customer of risks to its on-time completion. 8. Coordinating the completion and approval of change orders. 2.10.2. The Customer Project Management Responsibilities Questica License and Service Agreement Page Page 370 Item#21. 1. The timely delivery of items identified as "Customer task"within this SoW. 2. Advising The Customer of expected delivery dates for items identified as "Customer task" within this SoW. 3. Ensuring that change orders contain a full specification of the changes required. 4. Ensuring that customizations are fully specified and documented. 5. Ensuring that all Customer team members have a clear understanding of their responsibilities to the project. 2.10.3. Project Planning 1. The project plan will be prepared by the Questica project manager in consultation with The Customer's project manager and team members. 2. The project planning phase will determine whether Questica Budget modules are to be implemented serially or in parallel and, if serially, the order of module implementation. 3. The implementation of each Questica Budget module will involve the following stages: a. An overview of, and training in, the module and the ways in which the module can be extended by configuration and customizations. b. A determination of how best to configure and, if necessary, customize the module to meet the objectives of The Customer. C. An overview of the advantages and, if present, disadvantages of the proposed configuration and customizations. d. Documentation of the agreed configuration and customizations. e. The preparation of data import templates consistent with the agreed configuration and customizations. f. The completion by The Customer of the data import templates. g. The import by Questica of the data import templates. h. Customer approval of the imported Questica Budget structures and data. i. The creation of custom report entities to support The Customer's reporting, where such reporting is not readily available within Questica Budget's "natural" data model. j. Training in the creation of(ad hoc)views, and ad hoc print reports using Microsoft Report Builder 3.0. k. Determination of custom reporting requirements that cannot be met by the standard reports and the use of the out-of-the-box ad hoc reporting features. I. The preparation of change orders and specification for any custom reports not detailed in this Scope of Work. M. The development by Questica of any required custom reports, whether detailed in this Scope of Work or added to the scope through a change order. n. The testing and acceptance of custom reports and report views. o. The deployment of custom reports and report views. Questica License and Service Agreement Page Page 371 Item#21. P. The development of an integration strategy for updating the Questica Budget database with actual result data from the financial system and the passing of budget data into the financial system. q. The development by The Customer of the integration components (queries, intermediate tables, file output/input etc.)which are required to access actual data from the financial system/HR System and update the financial system with budget data. r. The development by Questica of: i. integration components which transform budget data prior to updating the financial system; ii. integration components which transform actual result data prior to updating the Questica Budget database; iii. integration components required to initiate the execution of integrations. S. The deployment of all integration components. t. The testing and acceptance by The Customer of the integration components. 2.11. Customer Resources 1. The requirement for Customer resources is variable with: a. The duration of the project. b. The degree of internal Customer consultation. C. The level of internal Customer agreement. d. The number of customizations. e. The familiarity of Customer staff with the SQL Server environment. Questica License and Service Agreement Page Page 372 Item#21. APPENDIX D—Contract Exceptions This Appendix D is reserved for agreed upon changes or exceptions to the License and Service Agreement. Changes in this Appendix D supersede and replace the identified language or section from the License and Service Agreement. END OF LICENSE AND SERVICE AGREEMENT DOCUMENT Questica License and Service Agreement Page Page 373 CONTRACT CHECKLIST I. PROJECT INFORMATION Date: 8/27/2020 REQUESTING DEPARTMENT FINANCE Project Name: Budget Software Project Manager: Jenny Fields Contract Amount: $271,112 Contractor/Consultant/Design Engineer: Contractor- Black Eagle Construction Is this a change order? Yes ❑ No ❑� Change Order No. N/A II. BUDGET INFORMATION (Project Manager to Complete) III. Contract Type Fund: 01 Budget Available(Purchasing attach report): Department 1500 Yes 0 No ❑ Construction ❑ GL Account 94310/53360 FY Budget: 2020 Task Order ❑ Project Number: 10657 Enhancement: Yes ❑ No 0 Professional Service 0 Equipment ❑ Will the project cross fiscal years? Yes❑ No ❑� Grant ❑ IV. GRANT INFORMATION-to be completed only on Grant funded projects Grant#: Wage Determination Received Wage Verification 10 Days prior to bid due date Debarment Status(Federal Funded) N/A N/A N/A N/A Print and Attach the determination Print,attach and amend bid by addendum(if changed) www.sam.gov Print and attach V. BASIS OF AWARD BID RFP/RFQ TASK ORDER Award based on Low Bid Highest Ranked Vendor Selected Master Agreement Category (Bid Results Attached) Yes ❑ No ❑ (Ratings Attached) Yes ❑No U Date MSA Roster Approved: Typical Award Yes Q No ❑ If no please state circumstances and conclusion: This purchase is made from an Idaho State Contract Date Award Posted: 7 day protest period ends: VI. CONTRACTOR/CONSULTANT REQUIRED INFORMATION PW License N/A Expiration Date: N/A Corporation Status Insurance Certificates Received(Date): N/A Expiration Date: N/A Rating: N/A Payment and Performance Bonds Received(Date): N/A Rating: N/A Builders Risk Ins.Req'd: Yes ❑ No ❑ If yes,has policy been purchased? N/A (Only applicabale for projects above$1,000,000) VII. TASK ORDER SELECTION (Project Manager to Complete) Reason Consultant Selected ❑ 1 Performance on past projects Check all that apply ❑ Quality of work ❑ On Budget ❑On Time ❑ Accuracy of Construction Est ❑ 2 Qualified Personnel ❑ 3 Availability of personnel ❑4 Local of personnel Description of negotiation process and fee evaluation: Enter Supervisor Name Date Approved Vill. AWARD INFORMATION Date Submitted to Clerk for Agenda: August 27,2020 Approval Date 9-8-2022 By: Council Purchase Order No.: Date Issued: WH5 submitted N/A (Only for PW Construction Projects) NTP Date: Contract Request Checklist.5.242016.Final Item#22. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution No. 20-2227: A Resolution Adopting the Fiscal Year 2020 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection Services; Authorizing the Finance Department to Collect Such Fees; and Providing an Effective Date Page 375 CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 20-2227 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, HOAGLUN, PERREAULT, STRADER A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2020 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES; AUTHORIZING FINANCE DEPARTMENT TO COLLECT SUCH FEES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 21 of the City's solid waste franchise agreement with Republic Services, Inc.,providing for annual review of rates and charges for services provided, Republic identified necessary updates to the solid waste collection fee schedule and presented proposed changes to the Solid Waste Advisory Commission at its meeting on July 22nd, 2020 and August 5th, 2020 and to the Meridian City Council at its meeting on August 25th, 2020; and WHEREAS,the Solid Waste Advisory Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the FY21 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection Services, as set forth in Exhibit A hereto; and WHEREAS,pursuant to Idaho Code section 63-1311A, following publication of notice on August 14, 2020 and August 21, 2020, and public hearing on August 25, 2020, the City Council of Meridian did, by formal motion, approve the FY21 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection Services, as set forth in Exhibit A hereto; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section 1. That the FY21 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection Services, as set forth in Exhibit A, is hereby adopted. Section 2. That, as of its effective date, the FY21 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection Services, as set forth in Exhibit A, will supersede all previous solid waste collection fees and fee schedules previously adopted. Section 3. That the Finance Department of the City of Meridian is hereby authorized to implement and carry out the collection of fees as set forth in Exhibit A. Section 4. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect on October 1, 2020. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 25th day of August, 2020. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 25th day of August, 2020. APPROVED: ATTEST: Robert E. Simison, Mayor Chris Johnson, City Clerk ADOPTION OF FY21 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES PAGE 1 EXHIBITA FY21 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES RESIDENTIAL TRASH & RECYCLING FEE DESCRIPTION FY21 FEE Residential 95 gallon service (includes 1 recycling cart) $20.87 Residential 65 gallon service (includes 1 recycling cart) $18.63 Residential 35 gallon service (includes 1 recycling cart) $16.41 Residential Extra Carts (per cart per month) $2.49 Residential Cart Pickup/Upsize Exchange fee (per event) $14.80 Residential Cart Delivery(free) $0.00 Residential Carry Out Service $34.86 COMMERCIAL PERMANENT TRASH FEE DESCRIPTION FY21 FEE Commercial Carts Delivery Charge $11.12 Commercial Carts 1, 95 gallon cart (1 x per week) $32.17 Commercial Carts 1, 95 gallon cart (2 x per week) $60.82 Commercial Carts 1, 95 gallon cart(3 x per week) $89.45 Commercial Carts 2, 95 gallon cart (1 x per week) $64.35 Commercial Carts 2, 95 gallon cart (2 x per week) $121.65 Commercial Carts 2, 95 gallon cart(3 x per week) $178.88 Commercial Carts 3, 95 gallon cart (1 x per week) $96.53 Commercial Carts 3, 95 gallon cart(2 x per week) $182.47 Commercial Carts 3, 95 gallon cart (3 x per week) $268.32 Commercial Container Container Delivery Svc (2,3,6,8 yd options) $25.36 Commercial Container Lid Lock Installation(2,3,6,8 yd options) $47.76 Commercial Container Monthly Lock Service (2,3,6,8 yd options) $13.77 Commercial Container 2 yd(Extra Dump) $26.14 Commercial Container 3 yd(Extra Dump) $35.59 Commercial Container 6 yd(Extra Dump) $51.75 Commercial Container 8 yd(Extra Dump) $66.58 Commercial Containers 2 yd(Ix per week) $106.78 Commercial Containers 2 yd(2x per week) $152.57 Commercial Containers 2 yd(3x per week) $197.57 Commercial Containers 2 yd(4x per week) $265.04 Commercial Containers 2 yd(5 x per week) $332.37 Commercial Containers 2 yd(6 x per week) $399.70 Commercial Containers 3 yd(1 x per week) $111.17 Commercial Containers 3 yd(2 x per week) $180.04 Commercial Containers 3 yd(3 x per week) $249.03 Commercial Containers 3 yd(4 x per week) $328.11 Commercial Containers 3 yd(5 x per week) $431.35 Commercial Containers 3 yd(6 x per week) $522.54 Commercial Containers 6 yd(1 x per week) $173.42 ADOPTION OF FY21 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES PAGE 2 Commercial Containers 6 yd(2 x per week) $280.10 Commercial Containers 6 yd(3 x per week) $386.67 Commercial Containers 6 yd(4 x per week) $515.58 Commercial Containers 6 yd(5 x per week) $644.56 Commercial Containers 6 yd(6 x per week) $773.46 Commercial Containers 8 yd(1 x per week) $205.86 Commercial Containers 8 yd(2 x per week) $320.18 Commercial Containers 8 yd(3 x per week) $433.25 Commercial Containers 8 yd(4 x per week) $560.63 Commercial Containers 8 yd(5 x per week) $696.21 Commercial Containers 8 yd(6 x per week) $825.84 Commercial Containers 8 yd(7 x per week) $1,259.28 Commercial Compactors 2 yd(base price per pickup per week) $63.27 Commercial Compactors 3 yd(base price per pickup per week) $87.59 Commercial Compactors 4 yd(base price per pickup per week) $112.36 Commercial Compactors 5 yd(base price per pickup per week) $137.16 Commercial Compactors 6 yd(base price per pickup per week) $161.31 Commercial Compactors 8 yd(base price per pickup per week) $216.59 COMMERCIAL TEMPORARY TRASH FEE DESCRIPTION FY21 FEE Commercial Temporary Service 3 yd Haul Svc (Municipal Solid Waste) $44.60 Commercial Temporary Service 3 yd Haul Svc (Construction and Demolition) $119.45 Commercial Temporary Service 3 yd(Monthly Rent) $26.67 Commercial Temporary Service 3 yd(Daily Rent) $0.88 COMMERCIAL PERMANENT RECYCLING FEE DESCRIPTION FY21 FEE Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection Container Delivery Charge (3,5,6,8 yd options) $25.36 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 3 yd(Extra Dump) $18.28 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 3 yd(Every Other Week) $53.62 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 3 yd(1 x week) $67.10 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 3 yd(2 x week) $118.40 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 3 yd(3 x week) $169.73 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 3 yd(4 x week) $221.04 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 3 yd(5 x week) $272.33 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 5 yd(Extra Dump) $24.88 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 5 yd(Every Other Week) $73.74 ADOPTION OF FY21 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES PAGE 3 Item#22. Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 5 yd(1 x week) $102.27 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 5 yd(2 x week) $171.81 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 5 yd(3 x week) $240.87 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 5 yd(4 x week) $310.16 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 5 yd(5 x week) $379.44 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 6 yd(Extra Dump) $30.24 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 6 yd(Every Other Week) $87.43 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 6 yd(1 x week) $108.63 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 6 yd(2 x week) $194.17 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 6 yd(3 x week) $279.68 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 6 yd(4 x week) $365.22 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 6 yd(5 x week) $450.76 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 8 yd(Extra Dump) $41.31 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 8 yd(Every Other Week) $103.76 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 8 yd(1 x week) $129.84 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 8 yd(2 x week) $236.25 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 8 yd(3 x week) $342.66 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 8 yd(4 x week) $449.11 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 8 yd(5 x week) $557.45 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 95 gallon carts (1 cart/week) $14.05 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 95 gallon carts (2 cart/week) $22.29 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 95 gallon carts (3 cart/week) $30.54 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 95 gallon carts (4 cart/week) $38.80 Commercial Commingled Recyclable Collection 95 gallon carts (5 cart/week) $47.03 INDUSTRIAL TRASH ADOPTION OF FY21 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES PAGE 4 Item#22. FEE DESCRIPTION FY21 FEE Industrial Trash Container Delivery Svc 6 - 10 yd $25.63 Industrial Trash 6 - 10 yd containers (Haul Svc) $112.42 Industrial Trash 6 yd Disposal Fee (Municipal Solid Waste) $30.74 Industrial Trash 6 yd Disposal Fee (C&D/Compacted) $30.74 Industrial Trash 6 yd(Monthly Rent) $56.66 Industrial Trash 6 yd(Daily Rent) $1.87 Industrial Trash 8 yd Disposal Fee (Municipal Solid Waste) $30.74 Industrial Trash 8 yd Disposal Fee (C&D/Com acted) $30.74 Industrial Trash 8 yd(Monthly Rent) $73.44 Industrial Trash 8 yd(Daily Rent) $2.42 Industrial Trash 10 yd Disposal Fee (Municipal Solid Waste) $30.74 Industrial Trash 10 yd Disposal Fee (C&D/Compacted) $30.74 Industrial Trash 10 yd(Monthly Rent) $81.84 Industrial Trash 10 yd(Daily Rent) $2.70 Industrial Trash Container Delivery Svc 20 -40 yd $25.63 Industrial Trash/Diversion/Recycling 20 - 40 yd screen lid $41.20 Industrial Trash 20 - 40 yd containers (Haul Svc) $369.50 20 - 40 yd containers (Haul Svc for Asbestos -Ada Industrial Trash County) $320.43 20 - 40 yd containers (Certification fee Asbestos - Ada Industrial Trash County) $23.32 20 - 40 yd containers (Haul Svc for Asbestos - Idaho Industrial Trash Waste Systems) $320.43 Industrial Trash 20 yd Disposal Fee (Municipal Solid Waste) $30.74 Industrial Trash 20 yd Disposal Fee (C&D/Compacted) $30.74 Industrial Trash 20 yd Disposal Fee (Asbestos -Ada County Landfill) $30.74 Industrial Trash 20 yd Disposal Fee (Asbestos - Idaho Waste Systems) $800.00 Industrial Trash 20 yd(Monthly Rent) $94.10 Industrial Trash 20yd(Daily Rent) $3.11 Industrial Trash 30 yd Disposal Fee (Municipal Solid Waste) $30.74 Industrial Trash 30 yd Disposal Fee (C&D/Compacted) $30.74 Industrial Trash 30 yd Disposal Fee (Asbestos -Ada County Landfill) $30.74 Industrial Trash 30 yd Disposal Fee (Asbestos - Idaho Waste Systems) $1,200.00 Industrial Trash 30 yd(Monthly Rent) $115.01 Industrial Trash 30 yd(Daily Rent) $3.77 Industrial Trash 40 yd Disposal Fee (Municipal Solid Waste) $30.74 Industrial Trash 40 yd Disposal Fee (C&D/Compacted) $30.74 Industrial Trash 40 yd Disposal Fee (Asbestos -Ada County Landfill) $30.74 Industrial Trash 40 yd disposal Fee (Asbestos - Idaho Waste Systems) $1,600.00 Industrial Trash 40 yd(Monthly Rent) $131.43 Industrial Trash 40 yd(Daily Rent) $4.31 Industrial Trash 20yd compactor Disposal Fee $30.74 Industrial Trash 25yd compactor Disposal Fee $30.74 ADOPTION OF FY21 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES PAGE 5 Item#22. Industrial Trash 30yd compactor Disposal Fee $30.74 Industrial Trash 40yd compactor Disposal Fee $30.74 Industrial Trash Container Delivery Svc 6-10 yd $25.63 Industrial Trash 6-10 yd containers (Haul Svc) $112.42 Industrial Trash 6 yd Disposal Fee (Municipal Solid Waste) $30.74 Industrial Trash 6 yd Disposal Fee (C&D/Compacted) $30.74 Industrial Trash 6 yd(Monthly Rent) $56.66 Industrial Trash 6 yd(Daily Rent) $1.87 Industrial Trash 8 yd Disposal Fee (Municipal Solid Waste) $30.74 Industrial Trash 8 yd Disposal Fee (C&D/Compacted) $30.74 Industrial Trash 8 yd(Monthly Rent) $73.44 Industrial Trash 8 yd(Daily Rent) $2.42 Industrial Trash 10 yd Disposal Fee (Municipal Solid Waste) $30.74 Industrial Trash 10 yd Disposal Fee (C&D/Compacted) $30.74 Industrial Trash 10 yd(Monthly Rent) $81.84 Industrial Trash 10 yd(Daily Rent) $2.70 Industrial Trash Container Delivery Svc 20 -40 yd $25.63 Industrial Trash/Diversion/Recycling 20 - 40 yd screen lid $41.20 Industrial Trash 20 - 40 yd containers (Haul Svc) $369.50 20 - 40 yd containers (Haul Svc for Asbestos -Ada Industrial Trash County) $320.43 20 - 40 yd containers (Certification fee Asbestos - Ada Industrial Trash County) $23.32 20 - 40 yd containers (Haul Svc for Asbestos - Idaho Industrial Trash Waste Systems) $320.43 Industrial Trash 20 yd Disposal Fee (Municipal Solid Waste) $30.74 INDUSTRIAL DIVERSION Industrial Diversion Container Delivery Svc 6 - 10 yd $25.63 Industrial Diversion 6 - 8 yd containers (Haul Svc) $63.35 Industrial Diversion 6 yd Disposal Fee (Wood) $30.74 Industrial Diversion 6 yd Disposal Fee (Sheetrock) $30.74 Industrial Diversion 6 yd Disposal Fee (Clean Rock, Gravel, etc.) $30.74 Industrial Diversion 8 yd Disposal Fee (Wood) $30.74 Industrial Diversion 8 yd Disposal Fee (Sheetrock) $30.74 Industrial Diversion 8 yd Disposal Fee (Clean Rock, Gravel, etc.) $30.74 Industrial Diversion 10 yd Disposal Fee (Wood) $30.74 Industrial Diversion 10 yd Disposal Fee (Sheetrock) $30.74 Industrial Diversion 10 yd Disposal Fee (Clean Rock, Gravel, etc.) $30.74 Industrial Diversion Container Delivery Svc 20 -40 yd $25.63 Industrial Diversion 20 - 40 yd Wood, Sheetrock, Clean Rock $141.39 Industrial Diversion 20 yd Disposal Fee (Wood) $30.74 Industrial Diversion 20 yd Disposal Fee (Sheetrock) $30.74 Industrial Diversion 20 yd Disposal Fee (Clean Rock, Gravel, etc.) $30.74 Industrial Diversion 30 yd Disposal Fee (Wood) $30.74 ADOPTION OF FY21 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES PAGE 6 Page 381 Item#22. Industrial Diversion 30 yd Disposal Fee (Sheetrock) $30.74 Industrial Diversion 30 yd Disposal Fee (Clean Rock, Gravel, etc.) $30.74 Industrial Diversion 40 yd Disposal Fee (Wood) $30.74 Industrial Diversion 40 yd Disposal Fee (Sheetrock) $30.74 INDUSTRIAL RECYCLING FEE DESCRIPTION FY21 FEE Industrial Recycling Processing per loose yard (as applicable) $1.08 Industrial Recycling Processing per compact yard(as applicable) $2.16 Industrial Recycling Container Deliver Svc 6 - 10 yd $25.63 Industrial Recycling 6 - 10 yd containers (Haul Svc) $63.35 Industrial Recycling 6 yd(Monthly Rent) $56.66 Industrial Recycling 6 yd(Daily Rent) $1.87 Industrial Recycling 8 yd(Monthly Rent) $73.44 Industrial Recycling 8yd (Daily Rent) $2.42 Industrial Recycling 10 yd(Monthly Rent) $81.84 Industrial Recycling 10 yd(Daily Rent) $2.70 Industrial Recycling Contain Deliver Svc 20 -40 yd $25.63 Industrial Recycling 20-40 yd containers (Haul Svc) $141.39 Industrial Recycling 20 yd(Monthly Rent) $94.10 Industrial Recycling 20 yd(Daily Rent) $3.11 Industrial Recycling 30 yd(Monthly Rent $115.01 Industrial Recycling 30 yd(Daily Rent) $3.77 Industrial Recycling 40 yd(Monthly Rent) $131.43 Industrial Recycling 40 yd(Daily Rent) $4.31 Industrial Recycling 15 - 40 yd Compactors (Haul Svc) $141.39 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES FEE DESCRIPTION FY21 FEE Miscellaneous Collection Tires 9 (ea.)up to 16 inch $6.17 Miscellaneous Collection Freon-containing units/appliances $58.76 Miscellaneous Collection Non-Freon units/appliances $16.66 Miscellaneous Collection Special Collection(for each increment of 10 minutes) $23.55 Miscellaneous Collection Bulky Item Pickup (per item) $16.66 Miscellaneous Collection Extra Pickup/Go Back(per occurrence) $11.88 Miscellaneous Collection Relocation(all sizes) - Commercial/Industrial $25.63 Industrial Services Turnaround compactor fee -Commercial/Industrial $17.98 Miscellaneous Collection Weekend Charge - Industrial $72.77 Miscellaneous Collection Pressure Wash- Industrial $214.54 Industrial Services Dry Run- Large industrial containers and compactors $109.22 Industrial Services Dry Run(6 - 10 d) $63.35 Miscellaneous Collection Commercial Combo Lock Replacement $30.57 Commercial Container Extra Yard (Overload Each yd) $16.29 ADOPTION OF FY21 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES PAGE 7 Item#23. (:> E IDIAN*-----, AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution No. 20-2228: A Resolution Authorizing The Sixth Continuance of a Local Disaster Emergency Declaration and its Terms for an Additional Thirty (30) Days; Authorizing the Continued Immediate Expenditure of Public Money to Safeguard Life, Health and Property; and Providing an Effective Date ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-117728 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=3 KRISTINA LOWRY 09/10/2020 10:55 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE RESOLUTION 20-2228 BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, BY THE COUNCIL: HOAGLUN, PERREAULT, STRADER A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SIXTH CONTINUANCE OF A LOCAL DISASTER EMERGENCY DECLARATION AND ITS TERMS FOR AN ADDITIONAL THIRTY (30) DAYS; AUTHORIZING THE CONTINUED IMMEDIATE EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC MONEY TO SAFEGUARD LIFE, HEALTH AND PROPERTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19)pandemic continues to represent an imminent threat to the life, health, and property of the City of Meridian and its citizens; and WHEREAS, a local disaster emergency, as defined in Section 46-1002, Idaho Code, continues to be in existence in the City of Meridian due to the imminent threat to life and property; and WHEREAS,pursuant to the authority granted in Section 46-1011, Idaho Code, the Mayor of the City of Meridian, on March 16, 2020, declared a local disaster emergency; and WHEREAS, on March 17, 2020 the City Council of the City of Meridian passed Resolution 20-2195 ratifying the Mayor's Declaration and authorizing the continuance of the local disaster emergency declaration for a period of thirty(30) days; and WHEREAS, on April 14, 2020 the City Council of the City of Meridian passed Resolution 20- 2203 authorizing the continuance of the local disaster emergency declaration for an additional thirty (30) days; and WHEREAS, on May 12th, 2020 the City Council of the City of Meridian passed Resolution 20-2210 authorizing the continuance of the local disaster emergency declaration for an additional thirty(30) days; and WHEREAS, on June 9th, 2020 the City Council of the City of Meridian passed Resolution 20- 2214 authorizing the continuance of the local disaster emergency declaration for an additional thirty (30) days; and WHEREAS, on July 14th 2020, the City Council of the City of Meridian passed Resolution 20-2216 authorizing the continuance of the local disaster emergency declaration for an additional thirty(30) days; and WHEREAS, on August 1 ph, 2020, the City Council of the City of Meridian passed Resolution 20-2222 authorizing the continuance of the local disaster emergency declaration for an additional thirty(30) days; and WHEREAS, it is deemed necessary by the Council of the City of Meridian to extend such local disaster emergency declaration for an additional thirty(30) days to provide for the ongoing response to the COVID-19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, Section 67-2808, Idaho Code, authorizes the Council of the City of Meridian to declare an emergency authorizing the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health or property; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Meridian deems it necessary for the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Meridian to continue the authorization for the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health and property; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That the Declarations of Local Disaster Emergency pursuant to Resolutions 20- 2195, 20-2203, 20-2210, 20-2214, 20-2216, and 20-2222 shall remain in effect for an additional period of thirty(30) days from the effective date of this Resolution unless terminated, modified or unless extended for thirty(30) day increments. Section 2. That the continued immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard the life, health and property of the City of Meridian is hereby authorized for an additional thirty(30) day increment. Section 3. That this Resolution shall be effective on September 13, 2020, and shall establish an uninterrupted period of Emergency Declaration from March 17, 2020 through midnight on October 12, 2020. Section 4. That this resolution shall supersede and void all other resolutions, orders, or parts thereof that may conflict herewith. Section 5. That a copy of this resolution shall be promptly filed with the Ada County Recorder. ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 8th day of September 2020. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, this 81h day of September 2020. Robert E. Simison Mayor ATTEST: Chris Johnson City Clerk RESOLUTION REAUTHORIZING DECLARATION OF LOCAL DISASTER EMERGENCY Page 2 STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) On this 8th day of September 2020,before me,a Notary Public,personally appeared Robert E.Simison and Chris Johnson,known or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk,respectively,of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City,and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public_fpr Id )io Residing at: Perlclan, Idaho Commission expires: 3-28-2022 RESOLUTION REAUTHORIZING DECLARATION OF LOCAL DISASTER EMERGENCY Page 3 Page 386 Item#24. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: AP Invoices for Payment- 09-09-20 - $386,460.25 Page 387 Item#24. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund A-1 STAMP&MABEL'S LABELS 2x12 Radiant Gold/Black Name Plate for Administrative 10.00 Assist 01 General Fund ADA COUNTY PARAMEDICS 220/ACLS online skills lab,C. Butterfield 132.00 01 General Fund ADVANCE AUTO PARTS air filter for fleet truck 29-qty 1 20.99 01 General Fund ADVANCE AUTO PARTS air filters for Fuller Park mules-qty 2 20.01 01 General Fund ADVANCE AUTO PARTS battery for fleet truck 29-qty 1 174.99 01 General Fund ADVANCE AUTO PARTS belts for Ventrac tough cut-qty 3 30.66 01 General Fund ADVANCE AUTO PARTS oil filter&oil for Gravely UTV at Discovery Park-qty 5 39.90 01 General Fund ADVANCE AUTO PARTS sand paper for Parks Shop-qty 2 7.32 01 General Fund ADVANCE AUTO PARTS wiper blades for fleet truck 34-qty 2 18.74 01 General Fund AIR FILTER SUPERSTORE WHOLESALE air filters for Settlers Park-qty 20 112.60 LLC 01 General Fund AMAZING ATHLETES instructor fee-Amazing Athletes 7/15-8/12/20-qty 12 614.40 01 General Fund AMERICAN POLYGRAPH ASSOCIATION American Polygraph Association Member Fee for 3. 75.00 Northway 01 General Fund ASAY DIRT WORKS,LLC DR20-9689 weed abatement blackcat&Pine SE Corner 812.50 8/7&8/13 01 General Fund AT&T MOBILITY LLC ATT First Net invoice 07/21-8/20/20 791.56 01 General Fund BME UPFITTING. LLC 2.0 Unit 143 repair radio antenna signal 205.80 01 General Fund BME UPFITTING. LLC 2.0 Unit 153 switched radio antenna cables 45.00 01 General Fund BME UPFITTING. LLC 2.0 Unit#6 under cover lights&MDT mount for property 3,267.00 crime div 01 General Fund BOE-Boise Office Equipment CN29065-01 220/ Maint. Fee Charged per copy 151.85 7/25-8/24/20 01 General Fund BOE-Boise Office Equipment Copier usage 7/22-8/21/2020 Xerox 81\1298 95.14 01 General Fund BRADY INDUSTRIES, LLC. 220/Janitorial and Shop Supplies Sta. 6 168.49 01 General Fund BRADY INDUSTRIES, LLC. 220/Janitorial Sta. 6 36.90 01 General Fund BUILDING BLOCKS IDAHO instructor fee-Minecraft Animation 8/10-8/14/20-qty 1,278.40 19 01 General Fund CAMPBELL TRACTOR INC. 2020 John Deere Gator TS-qty 1 7,500.00 01 General Fund CENTURYLINK CENTREX phone lines, Homecourt, FS#1 08/17- 737.08 09/16/20 01 General Fund CHAD SOMBKE, PH.D, P.C. Pre-employment eval: Seth Frauenpreis 400.00 01 General Fund CHAD SOMBKE, PH.D, P.C. Pre-employment evaluation: Alex Story 400.00 01 General Fund CLIMA-TECH CORPORATION for Evidence reinstall freezer alarm on new freezer 890.00 01 General Fund COLIN YATES TECC Refresher Training for SRO's 100.00 01 General Fund COMMERCIAL TIRE 220/MF037 Flat repair 46.00 01 General Fund COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 20-0253 ITD-Costco-Fiber Install Svc to 7/9/2020 40,752.00 01 General Fund D&B SUPPLY dog waste scoopers-qty 4 119.96 01 General Fund DENNIS DILLON POWER SPORTS Unit#523 48k mil maint.8/12/20 2,190.30 Date:9/1/20 01:11:20 PM Page:1 Page 388 Item#24. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund DYNA SYSTEMS shrink tube&screws for Lanark Parks Shop-qty 245 475.48 01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO outlets&wire for park picnic shelters-qty 103 80.82 01 General Fund EMERGENCY RESPONDERS HEALTH 2O-0028 220/Prev Health exams,qty 6 5,040.00 CENTER 01 General Fund FASTENAL COMPANY bolts for Lanark Parks Shop-qty 125 12.84 01 General Fund GIESLER'S AUTO REPAIR fleet truck 8 repair-license C18529 1,638.10 01 General Fund GRAINGER 220/batteries for equipment,ST. 2 53.24 01 General Fund GRANITE REAL ESTATE LLC REFUND CTI2020-0078 PERMIT plan modification 3,249.16 01 General Fund GREAT FLOORS 20-0143 220/flooring replacement ST. 3 1,493.30 01 General Fund GREAT FLOORS 20-0143, 220/floor replacement St. 1 24,633.90 01 General Fund GREAT FLOORS 20-0143,220/flooring replacement,St. 2 1,483.80 01 General Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY irrigation parts for Settlers Park-qty 20 4.80 01 General Fund HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS hand cart for Bear Creek Park-qty 1 59.99 01 General Fund HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS Phillips screwdrivers-qty 7 12.53 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 220/Faucet,Sta. 4 149.68 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 220/Maitenance hardward for water heater-Chain& 17.46 Lever#5 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 220/Staples for gun,Shop Supplies,Sta. 2 10.97 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES GFCI Recptacle Outlet Tester 9.97 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES miscellaneous tools for fleet truck 13-qty 8 75.58 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES screws-qty 2 9.54 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES screws for Lanark Parks Shop-qty 2 18.08 01 General Fund IDAHO ASSOC OF BUILDING OFFICIALS IDABO Member Dues 2020 Cox&Caulder 80.00 01 General Fund IDAHO CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES Business Cards A McNutt,Tiefenbach 46.25 01 General Fund IDAHO CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES Business cards M Carson 46.25 01 General Fund IDAHO HUMANE SOCIETY 20-0057 ID Humane Society animal control svc 43,378.00 Sept202O 01 General Fund IDAHO POWER Fire Department Power- August 2020 3,825.04 01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE legal notice Ordiance 20-1889- Meridian City Code 17.58 01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Pubilc Hearing Notice 9/17/20 Compass Point 106.99 Planning/Zoning 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE POLICE PD Background checks balance on acct 339.00 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE POLICE PD IDAPP0553748 C.B.Blackburn Bkgrnd Chk for MSU 166.25 Permit 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE POLICE PD IDAPP0553865 A.Anzalone Bkgrnd Chk for MSU Permit 33.25 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE POLICE PD IDFBI Background checks x1 33.25 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE POLICE PD IDFBII background check 11/21/19 x1 33.25 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE POLICE PD IDFBII background checks#109717&113363 7/22 66.50 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE POLICE PD IDFBIN background check#38225&#47279 66.50 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE POLICE PD IDFBIN background check x1 33.25 Date:9/1/20 01:11:20 PM Page:2 Page 389 Item#24. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE POLICE PD IDFBIN background checks#50813&54613 12/17/19 66.50 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE POLICE PD IDFBIN background checks 7/22 x18 598.50 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE POLICE PD NTNWDI background check x1 33.25 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE POLICE PD NTNWDI background checks#58214&58215 12/9/19 66.50 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE POLICE PD NTNWDI background checks 6/25&7/8 x6 199.50 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE POLICE PD NTNWDI background checks x2 10/2/2019 66.50 01 General Fund IDAHO STATESMAN HR job posting 6/21 crime data specialist 183.00 01 General Fund IDAHO STATESMAN HR job posting 7/12 records retentional analyst 167.00 01 General Fund IDAHO STATESMAN HR job posting 7/14 Building Inspector I 167.00 01 General Fund IDAHO STATESMAN HR job posting 8/2 Civil Engineer Plans Examiner 173.50 01 General Fund IDAHO STATESMAN HR job posting Admin Assistant I 7/5 203.25 01 General Fund IDAHO STATESMAN ID Statesman overpayment (946.80) 01 General Fund INTERMOUNTAIN DESIGN, INC 48 in top cap platinum metalic 38.50 01 General Fund INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL Code Book/Study Guide Plan Review 54.50 01 General Fund INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL ICC Code Change study material inspector bay 188.95 01 General Fund INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL ICC Code change study material Plan Review 138.00 01 General Fund JENSEN BELTS ASSOC 19-0303 pay#3 FMC Trailhub design at Ten Mile thru 1,699.00 8/17/20 01 General Fund JENSEN BELTS ASSOC 20-0154 pay#5 Heroes Park parking lot thru 8/17/20 4,236.20 01 General Fund JENSEN BELTS ASSOC 20-0286 pay#4 S Slough Pathway design thru 8/17/20 4,799.00 01 General Fund KATHY DRURY-BOGLE, PHR 20-0085 EDP 2020_June and July Development 4,000.00 01 General Fund L.N.CURTIS AND SONS 220/Boots-Johnston 115.00 01 General Fund LAWN CO MAINTENANCE miscellaneous sprinkler repairs @ contracted sites July 887.07 2020 01 General Fund LAWN EQUIPMENT COMPANY belt for Fuller Park mower-city 1 72.76 01 General Fund LAWN EQUIPMENT COMPANY credit on Fuller Park Hustler mower belt-city 1 (18.12) 01 General Fund LAWN EQUIPMENT COMPANY PTO belts for Walker H38i mower at Fuller Park-city 1 149.63 01 General Fund LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC. Level 3 Communications Telephone, 7/17-8/16/20 1,004.69 268238 01 General Fund LOWE'S credit-pushbrooms for Kleiner restrooms-city 5 (80.46) 01 General Fund LOWE'S pushbrooms for Kleiner Park restrooms-city 5 75.90 01 General Fund LOWE'S pushbrooms for Kleiner restrooms-city 5 80.46 01 General Fund M2M WIRELESS Parks Modem Service 7/17-8/16/20 Qty 31 197.66 01 General Fund MERCER HEALTH&BENEFITS 20-0333 Health&Benefits Consulting Services August 5,000.00 2020 01 General Fund MERIDIAN CHIROPRACTIC REFUND due to Covid Special Event Registration- 250.00 Vendor Fees 01 General Fund MERIDIAN VETERINARY HOSPITAL HEARTGARD MEDICATION X6 K9 WYATT 63.53 01 General Fund MOTIONS DANCE STUDIO instructor 9,399.20 fee-Tumble/Twist,Cheer,Ballet,Lyrical,Medley; 220 Date:9/1/20 01:11:20 PM Page:3 Page 390 Item#24. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund MOUNTAIN VIEW EQUIPMENT striper kit for Discovery Park-qty 1 125.00 01 General Fund NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS,INC. Snapshot pre-emergent-qty 1000 Ibs 1,790.00 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. 220/Copy Paper 41.19 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. 220/Label Maker 57.89 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Copy paper,Sharpies, plates for Mayors office 45.52 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Drawer organizer for 3. Iverson 7.04 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. erasable calendars&hanging file folders-qty 4 102.93 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Index Cards K Pitt 1.97 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. interoffice envelopes x100 20.66 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. laminating pouches-qty 2 pkgs 39.38 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. paper-qty 1 pk 11.82 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. red, black,&blue ink for stamps-qty 3 16.57 01 General Fund OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY Overhead door maintenance at Homecourt 380.00 01 General Fund OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY Overhead Door Maintenance at Parks Maintenance 285.00 01 General Fund OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY Overhead Door Maintenance at Parks Maintenance Bays 190.00 01 General Fund OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY Overhead Door Maintenance at Police Admin 135.00 01 General Fund OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY Overhead Door Maintenance at PSTC 95.00 01 General Fund OXARC,INC. 220/Medical Oxygen(2) 18.52 01 General Fund RED WING SHOES Safety boots for Daniel Cox 200.00 01 General Fund RODDA PAINT COMPANY picnic table paint-qty 5 gallons 261.35 01 General Fund SAM BROWN SHIELDS INC 220/Shields,traditional w/passport(10) 509.50 01 General Fund SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP Inspection of the 3 CH elevators following power outage 973.00 01 General Fund SIGNS, ETC 4 Signicade 24x36 A-Frame with 2 blank faces 500.00 01 General Fund SIGNS, ETC Kleiner Park outdoor gym bronze plaque-qty 1 622.00 01 General Fund SIGNS, ETC signs&sandwich boards for various sites-qty 16 706.00 01 General Fund SIGNS, ETC vehicle lettering for fleet truck 30-qty 1 85.00 01 General Fund SILVER CREEK SUPPLY sprinklers for various parks-qty 240 653.90 01 General Fund SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE 20-0366 Netmotion Wireless NM Mobility Premium 17,130.41 Maintenance 01 General Fund SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY Caution Tape, 16 24 in candle w/stripes, 16 rubber 476.00 bases 01 General Fund SPECIALTY MINING&INFIELD infield mix-qty 54 yards 4,330.00 SUPPLIES 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE 20-120 220/MF008 Brake/tail light lenses are melted 146.35 DIVISION 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE 20-120 220/MFO14 Preventive Maint. LOF 1,108.35 DIVISION 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE 20-120 220/MFO14 Water level lights,throttle toggle 686.36 DIVISION Date:9/1/20 01:11:20 PM Page:4 Page 391 Item#24. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE 20-120 220/MFO18 Ck Engine and Stop Engine 119.31 DIVISION Warnings on 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE 20-120 220/MF021-Lights out,check engine on 1,762.78 DIVISION 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE 20-120 220/MF021 Blown turbo 11,523.49 DIVISION 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE 20-120 220/MF021 Failed Starter 980.22 DIVISION 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE 20-120 220/MF021 Preventative Maint LOF 880.06 DIVISION 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE 20-120 220/MF023 Intallation of hands free system 1,041.44 DIVISION 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE 20-120 220/MF027 MDT not charging 127.50 DIVISION 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE 20-120 220/MF037 Preventive Maintenance LOF 1,171.61 DIVISION 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE 20-120 220/MF037 Tank fill valve leaking 414.38 DIVISION 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE 20-120 220/MF040 Fill tower screen,foam gauge off, 1,144.72 DIVISION dipstic 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE 20-120 220/MF040 Preventive Maintenance LOF 1,088.15 DIVISION 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE 20-120 220/MF045 Regen issues 425.00 DIVISION 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE 20-120 220/MF046 Check trans warning illuminated 175.00 DIVISION 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE 220/Coolant, 12gallons 209.16 DIVISION 01 General Fund T-ZERS SHIRT SHOP,INC 220/Embroidery, 1/4 zip(1) 32.25 01 General Fund T-ZERS SHIRT SHOP,INC uniform shirts,jackets,&hats for full-time staff-city 29 426.30 01 General Fund Tami 3 Leach instructor fee-Pickleball 7/23-8/13/20-city 6 288.00 01 General Fund THE ACTIVITY GROUP, INC Trauma Kit Supplies(academy) 421.90 01 General Fund THE CAR PARK Courthouse Parking for 3uly 2020 48.00 01 General Fund THE CAR PARK February 2020 Courthouse Parking Credit due to dbl (334.00) pymt 01 General Fund THE CAR PARK June 2020 Ada County Garage Validations 6.00 01 General Fund THE CAR PARK March 2020 Courthouse Parking 53.00 01 General Fund THE CAR PARK rec'd refund for credit on account 227.00 01 General Fund THE UPS STORE#2586 220/Shipping for repair of Sigtronic Head Set 145.25 01 General Fund THE UPS STORE#2586 Mail Evidence for Testing 68.15 Date:9/1/20 01:11:20 PM Page:5 Page 392 Item#24. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund TOMMY SIATHONE REFUND T. Siathone for 2020 Coed Flag Football Org 535.00 Pmt CR20- 01 General Fund TREASURE VALLEY TENNIS instructor fee-Tennis 8/4-8/13/20-city 121 3,097.60 ASSOCIATION 01 General Fund TRI-TECH FORENSICS,INC NIK Drug Testing Kits 610.70 01 General Fund UNIFORMS 2 GEAR Innovation Committee-test 511 brand clothing 24.45 01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. 965467287-00001 Data Plan#1 07/21 -08/20/20 2,784.29 BELLEVUE 01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. 965467287-00002 Cellphones-7/21 -8/20/20 8,607.65 BELLEVUE 01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. 965467287-00003 Data Plan#2 07/21 -08/20/20 1,208.76 BELLEVUE 01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. 965467287-00005 Data Plan #3 08/20-08/20/20 41.30 BELLEVUE 01 General Fund WEIDNER&ASSOCIATES 20-0210 220/6 fire helmets, PPE,Turnouts 2,601.90 01 General Fund WEIDNER&ASSOCIATES 220/12 of 50'yellow, 5 50'red,5 50'blue, Fire hose 3,536.00 01 General Fund WEIDNER&ASSOCIATES 220/White Hose&couplings,city 6 4,866.00 Total 01 General Fund 263,484.39 07 Impact Fund CSHQA 20-0163 Engineering service for scenario village 14,945.00 July202O Total 07 Impact Fund 14,945.00 20 Grant Fund IDAHO STATESMAN CDBG notice of hearing 6/19 FY20 action plan 80.04 governmental Total 20 Grant Fund 80.04 governmental 60 Enterprise A OMAR MENDOZA NAPOLES REFUND WT/S/T: 5404 N Landon Creek Overpayment 23.78 Fund by Previous R 60 Enterprise AATRONICS Labor to repair&reprogram Crestron processor for AV 1,474.00 Fund System 60 Enterprise ADA COUNTY WEED&PEST CONTROL Nixious weed spraying at WRRF 213.29 Fund 60 Enterprise ADA COUNTY WEED&PEST CONTROL Noxious weed spraying along N. Black Cat I.s. pressure 283.31 Fund lines 60 Enterprise AMERICAN TRAILER SALES CO. Rough Cut Wood, Linseed Oil, Labor for Flatbed Trailer 2,223.70 Fund Date:9/1/20 01:11:20 PM Page:6 Page 393 Item#24. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise ARNOLD MACHINERY CO Labor to troubleshoot squealing noise on froklift 242.00 Fund 60 Enterprise AT&T MOBILITY LLC ATT First Net invoice 07/21 -8/20/20 65.36 Fund 60 Enterprise BACKFLOW SUPPLY Watts Backflow Assembly,Qty 2 602.76 Fund 60 Enterprise BENJAMIN L SMITH REFUND WT/S/T: 4884 N Elena Meria PI Title Company 84.72 Fund Overpaid 60 Enterprise BOE-Boise Office Equipment 2TX070119 b/w(312 qty)&color(745 qty)images 43.35 Fund 60 Enterprise BOE-Boise Office Equipment 8TB614975 Copier Usage 7/10-8/9/20 42.65 Fund 60 Enterprise CAROL RITTER REFUND WT/S/T: 2688 E Bernice Dr Title Company 52.55 Fund Overpaid 60 Enterprise CENTURYLINK CENTREX phone lines, Homecourt, FS#1 08/17- 628.10 Fund 09/16/20 60 Enterprise CODY&KELLI WALKER REFUND WT/S/T: 2101 E Adelaid St Customer Paid 58.61 Fund After Closing 60 Enterprise COLUMBIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY Electrical Breaker,Qty 1,WO#GP21280 525.30 Fund 60 Enterprise COLUMBIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY Part to install heat trace on sampling pitcher pump(1 392.42 Fund qty) 60 Enterprise COLUMBIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY Parts to install pressure transducers(14 qty) 752.15 Fund 60 Enterprise COLUMBIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY Parts to install pressure transducers(2 qty) 364.50 Fund 60 Enterprise COLUMBIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY Parts to install pressure transducers(2,002 qty) 518.00 Fund 60 Enterprise COMMERCIAL TIRE 4 New Tires, Balance&Alignment, 626.08 Fund C18634,WO#307445 60 Enterprise CORE&MAIN LP Brass Bushing Hex Reducer,Qty 4 54.16 Fund 60 Enterprise CORE&MAIN LP Seat Ring Upper/Lower Valve Plate Assembly,Qty 1 379.95 Fund 60 Enterprise CUE'S INC Cable adapter tool for CCTV camera(1 qty) 264.38 Fund 60 Enterprise CUE'S INC Cable assy 379.64 Fund 60 Enterprise CUE'S INC Hands on training for CCTV Cues equipment for 1,040.00 Fund Collections Date:9/1/20 01:11:20 PM Page:7 Page 394 Item#24. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise CUE'S INC Returned y-eliminator(1 qty) (252.62) Fund 60 Enterprise CUE'S INC Shipping for loaner transporter 19.50 Fund 60 Enterprise D&B SUPPLY Pre-Mix Concrete, Fire Line Valve Repair for Selway 24.95 Fund Apts 60 Enterprise DARREL A BLOCK REFUND WT/S/T: 2278 E Bowman St Customer Paid 73.46 Fund After Closing 60 Enterprise DENISE MCGILL&RICK WILLSIE REFUND WT/S/T: 2948 N Timberfalls PI Title Company 67.43 Fund Overpaid 60 Enterprise DISASTER KLEENUP Roof Coverup for Well 22 Fire,WO#308167 398.78 Fund 60 Enterprise DUBOIS CHEMICALS INC 20-0002 Ferric Chloride(45,960 Ibs) 7,859.16 Fund 60 Enterprise DUBOIS CHEMICALS INC 20-0009 Defoamer tote(2,200 Ibs) 2,640.00 Fund 60 Enterprise EDGE ANALYTICAL,INC. IPDES testing(1 test) 97.00 Fund 60 Enterprise EDGE ANALYTICAL,INC. IPDES testing(3 tests) 740.00 Fund 60 Enterprise ENERGY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION Labor&parts for explosion proof motor rebuild 5,512.73 Fund 60 Enterprise EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL LLC PO#20-0019,OCCT Pilot Study @ Well 19 280.00 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. Fittings to intsall Y strainer on grit snail 1 &2(6 qty) 31.94 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. Meter Ring,Meter Lid w/Uni Hole,Qty 5 326.01 Fund 60 Enterprise GEOTECH ENVIRONMENTAL ORP Conductivitity, DO Solutions,Qty 6 383.58 Fund EQUIPMENT INC 60 Enterprise GRAINGER Brass Pressure Gauge 0-15 PSI,Qty 6 406.68 Fund 60 Enterprise GRAINGER Pressure gauge&pressure washer telescoping wand 278.18 Fund (2 qty) 60 Enterprise GRAINGER Y strainer to install TU5300 turbidimeter on influent 76.31 Fund analyz 60 Enterprise H.D. FOWLER COMPANY Brass Grip Joint Coupling No-Lead,Qty 12 257.76 Fund 60 Enterprise HACH COMPANY Chlorine Free CL17 Reagant Set,Qty 12 682.32 Fund Date:9/1/20 01:11:20 PM Page:8 Page 395 Item#24. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise HACH COMPANY Maintenance kit for turbidimeters(1 city) 1,242.24 Fund 60 Enterprise HACH COMPANY Silica High Range Rgnt Set, Dslvd Iron Chemkey,Cell 225.75 Fund Ong Kit 60 Enterprise HAZEL ASPHALT, LLC Asphalt Patching @ 324 W Winnipeg,WO#303262 750.00 Fund 60 Enterprise HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Pre-mix fuel for lawnmower/weed eater(12 city) 63.60 Fund 60 Enterprise HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Rain Gutter Sealant for Water Admin Bldg,Qty 3 17.22 Fund 60 Enterprise HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Tee, bushing,coupling,&nipple(18 city) 24.53 Fund 60 Enterprise IDAHO COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC REFUND warranty surety-2018-0064 ID College of 3,955.24 Fund MEDICINE Osteopathic M 60 Enterprise IDAHO CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES Business Cards A McNutt,Tiefenbach 45.50 Fund 60 Enterprise IDAHO CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES Business Cards, D. Dyer,Qty 1 46.25 Fund 60 Enterprise IDAHO POWER 2205167097 WWTP Power-Liftstations-August 2020 4,196.45 Fund 60 Enterprise JARED&NANCY JOHNSON REFUND WT/S/T: 390 W Heston Ct ACH Processed 140.33 Fund after closing 60 Enterprise KELLER ASSOCIATES,INC. 20-0053 Well 18 Water Trmt Svcs to 7/31/20 4,608.75 Fund 60 Enterprise LARRY&VICKI FLESHMAN REFUND WT/S/T: 1401 E Blue Tick St Customer Paid 40.10 Fund After Closi 60 Enterprise LAYNE of IDAHO,INC. Pull 50hp Pump&Motor,Replace Check Vlv Well 16B 3,769.00 Fund 60 Enterprise LORI M LEBLANC TRUST REFUND WT/S/T: 4468 W HIGHLAND FALL DR 40.14 Fund CUSTOMER PAID AFTER C 60 Enterprise LOWE'S Filter for Fridge in Water Breakroom,Qty 1 47.50 Fund 60 Enterprise M3 ID EGGERS TREEFARM LLC. REFUND Warranty Surety#2018-0081 Tree Farm 23,185.06 Fund Subd. No. 2 60 Enterprise MARION JW THOMPSON REFUND WT/S/T: 5323 N Chopin PI Customer Paid 41.07 Fund After Closing 60 Enterprise METROQUIP,INC. Direct Connection Lead,Qty 1 85.00 Fund 60 Enterprise MICHAEL&LAURIE HOLMES REFUND WT/S/T: 3050 N Glennfield Way Title 68.46 Fund Company Overpaid Date:9/1/20 01:11:20 PM Page:9 Page 396 Item#24. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise MOTION &FLOW CONTROL PRODUCTS Camlock fitings for struvite chemical tank(5 city) 245.92 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. 8mm 9 1/2 inches long nitrile gloves(10 boxs) 269.10 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Cart for lift station to help remove pumps(1 city) 296.51 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Couplings for mount for transducer at effluent parshal 310.14 Fund flume 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Garden hose adapter fitting (4 city) 14.64 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Hydraulic MPG oil filter(1 city) 29.56 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. No smoking/flame sings for new chem feed bldg(4 city) 82.28 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Oil service/repair kit(1 city) 124.67 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Paint for modified A/B valves(12 city) 79.44 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Paper towels for Pretreatment group(1 cs) 37.88 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Replacement valve for boiler#4 to repair leaking (1 128.29 Fund city) 60 Enterprise MURRAYSMITH INC 19-0389 task 10620.a FINAL water main Hickory to 622.50 Fund Fairview 60 Enterprise MURRAYSMITH INC Flow meter installation/maintenance data analysis(28 5,096.00 Fund hrs) 60 Enterprise NICHOLAS&JOHN PATTON-MOFFETT REFUND WT/S/T: 485 E Radiant Ridge St Title 100.00 Fund Company Overpaid 60 Enterprise OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY Fire drop door test in Lab bldg 110.00 Fund 60 Enterprise OXARC,INC. Citric acid granules(3 bgs) 218.26 Fund 60 Enterprise OXARC,INC. PO#20-0342,Sodium Hypochlorite,Well 3,239.10 Fund 19,20,16,22,Qty 1890gl 60 Enterprise OXARC,INC. PO#20-0342,Sodium Hypochlorite,Well 6,551.50 Fund 27,19,20,11,28,22,21 60 Enterprise PACIFIC BACKFLOW LLC PO#20-0008,Test City Property Backflows,Qty 34 782.00 Fund 60 Enterprise PACIFIC STEEL&RECYCLING Aluminum angle for operators sludge judge(2 city) 42.08 Fund Date:9/1/20 01:11:20 PM Page:10 Page 397 Item#24. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise PACIFIC STEEL&RECYCLING Aluminum materials to build mound for VFD/electrical 980.84 Fund (1 qty) 60 Enterprise PACIFIC STEEL&RECYCLING Credit for receiving wrong items(3 qty) (566.54) Fund 60 Enterprise PACIFIC STEEL&RECYCLING Flat Plate Steel, Rectangle,Square Tube Steel,Qty 3 161.29 Fund 60 Enterprise PACIFIC STEEL&RECYCLING Pipe to repair UV bulb wash tank(2 qty) 186.55 Fund 60 Enterprise ROBERT&RACHEL YOUNG REFUND WT/S/T: 5986 N Vicenza Ave Title Co. Over 7.73 Fund paid 60 Enterprise SAWTOOTH LAW OFFICES NO PO Water Main Repl. N. Hickory Legal Svc to 500.00 Fund 7/24/20 60 Enterprise SHANE&AMY GEHRING REFUND WT/S/T: 2566 W Tentuta Ct Title Company 93.63 Fund Overpaid 60 Enterprise SILVER CREEK SUPPLY Adapter&nozzle(6 qty) 94.54 Fund 60 Enterprise SPECIALTY PLASTICS&FAB,INC 1 inch ball valve&PVC elbow(8 qty) 176.92 Fund 60 Enterprise SPECIALTY PLASTICS&FAB,INC Pressure Reducing Valve, Ball Valve,Qty 12 2,317.40 Fund 60 Enterprise SPECIALTY PLASTICS&FAB,INC PVC 80 TUBV/SOC-THD Well 19,Qty 6 238.02 Fund 60 Enterprise STEVEN PEOPLES REFUND WT/S/T: 182 W Wausau St Customer Paid 50.11 Fund After Closing 60 Enterprise SUSAN PERRY REFUND WT/S/T: 915 E Antilles Ct Title Company 73.11 Fund Overpaid 60 Enterprise THERESA SGRIGNOLI REFUND WT/S/T: 6034 N Demille Ave Title Compnay 112.88 Fund Overpaid 60 Enterprise TIMOTHY&MARIANNE FROST REFUND WT/S/T: 945 E Palermo Ct credit on account 328.89 Fund 60 Enterprise ULINE,INC. Steel Dolly,Strap, Metal Platform,Qty 19 1,513.51 Fund 60 Enterprise UNITED SITE SERVICES INC NO PO WRRF Capacity Exp. Porta Potty Svc to 8/16/20 156.25 Fund 60 Enterprise USA BLUEBOOK 3'x 4 inch long rule(1 qty) 17.25 Fund 60 Enterprise USA BLUEBOOK Hydrant Diffuser,Qty 4 512.48 Fund 60 Enterprise USA BLUEBOOK Red Marking Paint,Qty 6 40.47 Fund Date:9/1/20 01:11:20 PM Page:11 Page 398 Item#24. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. 965467287-00001 Data Plan#1 07/21 -08/20/20 3,653.93 Fund BELLEVUE 60 Enterprise VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. 965467287-00002 Cellphones-7/21 -8/20/20 3,084.55 Fund BELLEVUE 60 Enterprise VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. 965467287-00003 Data Plan#2 07/21 -08/20/20 334.00 Fund BELLEVUE 60 Enterprise VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. 965467287-00005 Data Plan #3 08/20-08/20/20 1,073.88 Fund BELLEVUE 60 Enterprise WALTER POLY REFUND WT/S/T: 2244 E LATTICE DR TITLE 35.67 Fund COMPANY OVERPAID 60 Enterprise WESTERN EXTERMINATOR COMPANY Pest service for wasp infestation wher exhaust is in Lab 225.00 Fund bid 60 Enterprise WILLIAM F ANDERSON REFUND WT/S/T: 2632 W Carlton St Owner Overpaid 195.61 Fund on Accnt 60 Enterprise ZHANG YAN &JIAGAO LI REFUND WT/S/T: 3637 N Justin Ave Title Company 142.86 Fund Overpaid Total 60 Enterprise 107,950.82 Fund Report Total 386,460.25 Date:9/1/20 01:11:20 PM Page:12 Page 399 C � WE N DIAN --- IDAHO Planning and Zoning Presentation and Outline h2 City Council MeetingSeptember 8, 2020 Slide 1 h2 Agenda Item Numbers/Order: hoodc, 12/19/2006 Zoning MapAerial MapFuture Land Use Map Site viewed from S. Locust toward E. Locust Grove Site and “stub street” looking west down E. BentleyAdjacent property (east) looking east Grove looking South •portion of the land until developed. with site plan and requirement to seed and maintain vacant Conditions include development that is generally consistent •conditions. Staff and Planning Commission both recommend approval with •to commercial recommendations of FLUM. area. Issues include traffic, lighting, compatibility and opposition Several letters have been received from concerned citizens in the •and architectureDiscussion item included types of businesses, hours of operation •Heard this proposal on August 6, 2020 Item 25A: 1625 E. Bentley Drive (H-2020-0078) Application(s):  Annexation & zoning Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 1.55 acres of land, presently within unincorporated Ada County, located at southeast quadrant of S. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Bentley Dr. Adjacent Land Use & Zoning: North, south, east – Ada County R-1, West – R-2 and C-G Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Commercial Summary of Request: This is an annexation and zoning to allow a 4,800 sf office building and a future commercial lot (2 lots total). The subject property is at the SE quadrant of S. Locust Grove and E. Bentley Dr and presently contains a 2,100 sf house. S. Truss Pl to E. Bentley from S. Locust Grove Dr is the only way in and out of this property. Presently there is an unused “spur” of E. Bentley that runs along the north property line and terminates just before S. Locust Grove. Immediately to the north, south and east of this property is low density residential, although to the west and further to the south is highly intensive non-residential uses. This includes the Renaissance High School and the Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine across S. Locust Grove to the west, and commercial uses such as drive through restaurants and movie theaters to the south (south of I-84). The Comp Plan recommends the subject property (the directly adjacent) for commercial uses, and it recommends mixed use neighborhood for all the properties to the east. Sidewalks already exist on this side of S. Locust although the applicant will be required to install a 25’ landscape buffer. The business proposed with this annexation is presently located at 213 E. 5th Ave. in Meridian in a shared 3,800 square foot building. The existing business leases approximately 1,300 square feet of available space. The applicant has stated the size and configuration of the present building does not lend itself to the existing operations and there is no room for expansion. The applicant intends to construct and own a larger building designed for the operations which would also allow more flexibility in workspaces. As single family residential is not allowed in the C-G Zone District, as a condition of approval staff is recommending removal of the house prior to CO for any new commercial building. The applicant’s intent is to construct a new 4,800 square foot building on the southern portion of the property. However, the applicant has indicated a second commercial building may be built to the north. The property consists of a 1 acre parcel and a small .2 acre ‘strip of land” so it is technically two properties and it is possible the applicant could do a boundary line adjustment to create an additional buildable lot. At staff’s request, the applicant has provided the conceptual layout for both buildings. The site plan provided reflects commercial buildings at the north and south perimeters of the property, with parking central to the development. Staff believes the layout as proposed is an efficient design for the property. As the applicant intends this project to build out in two phases, staff has concerns that the undeveloped half of the property will remain a “no-man’s land” while the other half builds out. Staff recommends that the undeveloped portion of the property be seeded with native seed and maintained free of weeds until such a time as future development occurs. This proposal was heard at the August 8, 2020 PC meeting. Although no one showed up to testify in person, staff has received several letters in opposition from neighboring homeowners. Concerns include increased traffic, compatibility with adjacent residences, and opposition to the City’s FLUM commercial recommendations for the area. After a brief discussion regarding hours of operation, type of business and height of building, the Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval to the City Council. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL of the annexation and zoning to C-C with conditions. Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number 2020-0078, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of September 8, 2020, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to recommend denial of File Number 2020-0078, as presented during the hearing on September 8, 2020, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number 2020-0078 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance) Item#25. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for 1625 E. Bentley Drive (H-2020-0078) by Clint Hansen of Land Solutions, Located at 1625 E. Bentley Dr. A. Request: Annexation of 1.03 acres of land with the C-C zoning district. Page 400 PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: September 8, 2020 ITEM # ON AGENDA: 25 PROJECT NAME: 1625 E. BENTLEY DR. (H-2020-0078) PRINTED FULL NAME For Against Neutral Want to Testify YES OR NO 1 i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Item#25. E IDIAN IDAHO C� PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION Staff Contact:Alan Tiefenbach Meeting Date: September 8, 2020 Topic: public Hearing for 1625 E. Bentley Drive (H-2020-0078) by Clint Hansen of Land Solutions, Located at 1625 E. Bentley Dr. A. Request: Annexation of 1.03 acres of land with the C-C zoning district. Information Resources: Click Here for Application Materials Click Here to Sign Up to Testify at the City Council Hearing Page 401 Item#25. STAFF REPORT C� W IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING 9/8/2020 Legend DATE: I ®❑ 0 l�Praject Lorca=or ' : i ❑ . TO: Mayor&City Council XT- - ---, FROM: Alan Tiefenbach,Associate Planner 208-489-0573 SUBJECT: H-2020-0078 1625 E. Bentley Drive p -- LOCATION: The site is located within the southeast --- quadrant of S. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Bentley Dr. (north of I-84)., in the SW 1/4 of Section 17,Township 3 N.,Range 1W. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Annexation&zoning of 1.55 acres of land with Community Business District(C-C)zoning district to allow a 4,800 sf+/-office flex building,by Clint Hansen of Land Solutions. The applicant may eventually build a second commercial building. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 1.55 Future Land Use Designation Commercial Existing Land Use(s) Single Family/Rural Proposed Land Use(s) Commercial Office Flex Space Lots(#and type;bldg./common) 2 parcels Number of Residential Units(type None(existing house to be removed) of units) Physical Features(waterways, No significant physical features. hazards,flood plain,hillside) Neighborhood meeting date;#of May 26,2020— 14 attendees signed in. attendees: B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) No Page 1 Page 402 Item#25. Description Details Page • Requires ACHD Commission No Action(yes/no) Access(Arterial/Collectors/State There is only one point of through access Hwy/Local)(Existing and Proposed) to this property—From S. Locust Grove Rd.to S.Truss PI/E.Bentley Dr. There is presently no eastern through access due to cut-de-sacs and dead end streets. Stub Street/Interconnectivity/Cross Access There is an unnamed stub(ROW in front of the property)that dead-ends just east (but does not connect)to S.Locust Grove Rd.Westbound E.Bentley Dr. connects to S.Locust Grover Rd. Existing Road Network Arterial and Local Streets Existing Arterial Sidewalks/Buffers The applicant will be responsible for a 25'wide landscape buffer along S. Locust Grove Rd(sidewalks already exist in this area), 10'buffer and curb,gutter and sidewalk along S.Truss Pl.,and a 25' residential buffer along the south property line. Proposed Road Improvements S.Locust Grove Rd.has recently been widened and there is a roundabout planned for the S.Locust Grove Rd./E. Bentley Dr. intersection. Fire Service—No comments submitted Police Service—No comments submitted Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Services 0 • Sewer Shed dM Five Mile Trunkshed • Estimated Project Sewer ERU's See Application • WRRF Declining Balance 13.97 • Project Consistent with WW Yes Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts/Concerns • Flow is committed • No proposed changes to Public Sewer Infrastructure has been shown within record.Any changes or modifications to the public sewer infrastructure shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. Water • Distance to Water Services 0 • Pressure Zone 3 • Estimated Project Water ERU's See application • Water Quality No concerns • Project Consistent with Water N/A Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns No changes to public water infrastructure proposed. Page 2 Page 403 1 1 1 I IUIIP,�... ■.■.■ .■.■4uIIINI� ._.. FN +�t TY� �� �5 :■11■ � - 84 WNW ERIL- ■■ i■u NINE CAI MENEM �lI.I 111 n..■ 41111111.111mon _.ti-L.r_.=. Si L■ iG.:aKill��f:l$ iuuul—III■I■1 1•� .:.12-2 JI_! ■•�'� MEN Li�4t ■ ■ 84III I 16 �,,■■ ■ 1 .. i 1oon .. .. i..■.■■. loom 1 1 , ■ , Item#25. IV. NOTICING Planning&Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper Notification 7/7/2020 8/21/2020 Radius notification mailed to properties within 300 feet 7/14/2020 8/18/2020 Public hearing notice sign posted 7/24/2020 8/27/2020 on site Nextdoor posting 7/14/2020 8/18/2020 V. STAFF ANALYSIS A. Annexation: The proposed annexation area is contiguous to City annexed property and is within the Area of City Impact Boundary. To ensure the site develops as proposed by the applicant, staff is recommending a development agreement as part of the annexation approval. B. Future Land Use Map Designation(https://www.meridiancity.or /g compplan) This property is designated as Commercial on the City's Future Land Use Map (FL UM) contained in the Comprehensive Plan. This designation is to provide a full range of commercial uses to serve area residents and visitors. Desired uses may include retail, restaurants,personal and professional services, and office uses, as well as appropriate public and quasi public uses. The annexation area is near existing public services and is adjacent to the city limits.Although the majority of the properties in this area east of S. Locust Grove Road and north of I-84 are rural residential, the land directly surrounding the subject property is recommended for commercial uses.Also, approximately 350 feet to the east of the property, the FL UM recommends mixed use neighborhood. Most of the land on the west side of S. Locust Grove Rd. and south of I- 84 is zoned commercial; directly across S. Locust Grove Rd. there are several large non- residential developments such as the Renaissance High School and the Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine. The professional office flex space (for professional services)proposed under this annexation complies with the recommendations of the FLUM and would provide an appropriate transition in intensity from a commercial corridor to the existing residential at the north and east. The City may require a development agreement(DA) in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. In order to ensure the site develops as proposed with this application, staff recommends a DA as a provision of annexation with the provisions included in Section HIL.A. The DA is required to be signed by the property owner(s)/developer and returned to the City within 6 months of the Council granting the annexation for approval by City Council and subsequent recordation. Comprehensive Plan Policies (https:llwww.meridiancitE.or /g compplan): The following Comprehensive Plan Policies are applicable to this development: • Focus on developing industries that tend to exceed the living wage, such as technology, healthcare and other similar industries. (2.06.01E) Page 4 Page 405 Item#25. This annexation proposes a 4,300 square foot building for a land surveying company. This is considered a professional service, which may be a primary employer with higher wages. • Work with existing industrial businesses to expand or relocate operations to appropriate areas. (2.08.03C) The business proposed with this annexation is presently located at 213 E. 5`h Ave. in Meridian in a shared 3,800 square foot building. The existing business leases approximately 1,300 square feet of available space. The applicant has stated the size and configuration of the present building does not lend itself to the existing operations and there is no room for expansion. The applicant intends to construct and own a larger building designed for the operations which would also allow more flexibility in workspaces. According to the conceptual site plan submitted by the Applicant, the new office building would be constructed on the southern half of the property, to allow the possibility to eventually construct a second commercial building on the northern portion. The Comprehensive Plan supports this type of business in the proposed location. • Encourage infill development. (3.03.01E) The Comprehensive Plan defines infill as "development on vacant parcels, or redevelopment of existing parcels to a higher and better use that is surrounded by developed property within the City of Meridian." The subject property is surrounded by existing development on all sides, is directly adjacent to a commercial corridor, contains a vacant single family residence and is already connected to city water and sewer. • Focus development and redevelopment intensity on key transportation corridors. (3.07.02C) The proposed office flex building is proposed adjacent to S. Locust Grove Rd., a key transportation corridor. • Encourage compatible uses and site design to minimize conflicts and maximize use of land. (3.07.00) The surrounding neighborhood consists of primarily low density single family residential. The FL UM recommends the subject property and to the south for commercial uses, medium density residential to the north and mixed use neighborhood to the east. To the west of the property(across S. Locust Grove Rd.) are higher intensity non-residential uses such as the Renaissance High School and the Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine. South of the property(south ofI--84) are intensive commercial uses such as drive through restaurants and movie theaters. The proposed office flex building in this location will provide an appropriate transition from the residential and mixed use residential uses to the east to the commercial uses to the west and south. • "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and urban services at the time of final approval, and in accord with any adopted levels of service for public facilities and services."(3.03.03F) City water and sewer service is available along S. Locust Grove Rd. and can be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC I1-3A-21. Page 5 Page 406 Item#25. C. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There is an existing 2,123 single family residence on the property, constructed in 1972. As the property is proposed to be zoned to C-C, which does not allow single family residential, the existing house should be required to be removed as part of the annexation agreement. Proposed Use Analysis: Office buildings are listed as a principal permitted use (professional services) in the C-C zoning districts in UDC Table 11-2B-1. The applicant's intent is to construct a new 4,800 square foot building on the southern portion of the property. However, the applicant has indicated a second commercial building may be built to the north. The property consists of a I acre parcel and a small.2 acre `strip of land"so it is possible the applicant could do a boundary line adjustment to create an additional buildable lot. At staffs request, the applicant has provided the conceptual layout for both buildings. The site plan provided reflects commercial buildings at the north and south perimeters of the property, with parking central to the development. Staff believes the layout as proposed is an efficient design for the property. As the applicant intends this project to build out in two phases, staff has concerns that the undeveloped half of the property will remain a "no-man's land"while the other half builds out. Staff recommends that the undeveloped portion of the property be seeded with native seed and maintained free of weeds until such a time as future development occurs. D. Dimensional Standards(UDC 11-2): The zoning is proposed to be C-C. This requires no street setback but does require a 25' landscape buffer along arterial roads (S. Locust Grove Road) and 10'buffer along S. Truss Pl.A 25'residential landscape buffer is also required at the south of the property, adjacent to the neighboring existing single family residence. Building height is limited to 50'. E. Specific Use Standards(UDC 11-4-3): There are specific requirements regarding flex space. This includes roll-up doors not being visible from a public street and loading docks being prohibited. The conceptual elevations show the roll up doors on the north side of the building(away from S. Locust Grove Road),parking oriented toward the center of the buildings, and no loading docks. If a second building is constructed as proposed, this will also help minimize the view of the garage doors from public street view. F. Access(11-3A-3): Access to this property will occur from two points off of S. Truss Pl. S. Truss Pl. connects to E. Bentley Dr. and out to S. Locust Grove Rd(an arterial). The applicant has stated ACHD will require them to add curb,gutter and sidewalk along S. Truss Pl. to the south extent of their property. There is an existing stub off E. Bentley Dr. north of the subject property, which terminates in a dead end east of S. Locust Grove Rd. The applicant does not propose access from this street and ACHD is not requiring improvements to this road. G. Parking(UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for commercial districts based on one space per 500 feet of gross floor area. With a Page 6 Page 407 Item#25. proposed building size of 4,835 square feet, 10 parking spaces would be required. The conceptual site plan indicates 17 parking spaces for the first building, and the same amount of parking spaces for a conceptual second building. The parking requirements are satisfied, but staff notes the final number will probably be less because UDC 11-3B-8 requires an internal planter island of at least 50 square feet for every row of more than 12 parking spaces. H. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-17): Sidewalks already exist along S. Locust Grove Rd. The Applicant is required to add curb, gutter and sidewalk along S. Truss Pl. to the south extent of their property line. I. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-17): No parkways are proposed with this development. J. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): The applicant will be required to install a 25'wide buffer along S. Locust Grove RD. as is required for arterial streets, a 10'landscape buffer along S. Truss Pl. and E. Bentley Dr. as is required for local streets, and a 25'wide landscape at the south of the property as is required for any parcel sharing a contiguous lot line with a residential land use per UDC 11-2B. Parking lot landscaping, including 5'buffers adjacent to parking, loading and other vehicular use areas, including the possibility of planter islands, will also be required per UDC 11-3B. As mentioned, the applicant's plans reflect the desire to construct the first commercial building as phase one, and eventually construct a second building on the other half of the property. As mentioned above, staff is recommending the undeveloped portion of the property be seeded with native seed and maintained free of weeds until such a time as future development occurs. K. Tree preservation(11-3B-10) There are several existing trees on site.At time of CZC submittal, the applicant will be required to work with the City Arborist if removal is proposed.A mitigation plan may be required which would be required to indicate the total number and caliper inches of trees proposed for removal and the total number of replacement trees proposed. L. Waterways(UDC 11-3A-6): There are no significant waterways on the property. M. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): The concept plans do not indicate any fencing. All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6C and 11-3A-7. N. Utilities (UDC 11-3A-21): Public services are available to accommodate the proposed development. The subject property is already connected to City water and sewer which was installed with recent expansions to S. Locust Grove Road. O. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): The Applicant has submitted sample elevations of the proposed office flex building for this project (see Section VII). Page 7 Page 408 Item#25. The conceptual elevations show a one-story office building comprised of metal and fiber cement siding, with a sloping roof.As is required by UDC 11-4-3-18 for flex space, the roll-up doors are faced to the north, away from public streets. At time of CZC and DES submittal, complete architectural elevations with materials called out will be required and the architecture will be reviewed against the Architectural Standards Manual(ASM). It does appear that the conceptual elevations might not meet the standards of the ASM in regard to buildings with rooflines 50 feet in length incorporating roofline and parapet variations. Also, the Applicant should be aware that untextured concrete panels and prefabricated steel panels are prohibited as field materials for building fagades, except when used with a minimum of two other qualifying field materials and meeting all other standard fenestration and material requirements. The applicant site and building design is required to comply with the design standards in the UDC and the ASM. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation and zoning with the requirement of a Development Agreement with the conditions noted in Section VIII per the Findings in Section IX. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard this item on August 6,2020.At the public hearing,the Commission voted to recommend approval of the subject annexation request. 1. Summary of Commission Public Hearing a. In favor: Clint Hansen,Land Solutions b. In opposition: None c. Commenting: Clint Hansen,Land Solutions d. Written testimony: Robert and Lindeen Neufeld and Jeannette Tanner e. Staff presenting application: Alan Tiefenbach f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission a. Commissioners discussed an earlier site plan in the case file versus the newer one included in the staff report. Staff responded that the previous site plan did not show a second building. As staff was writing the staff report,the applicant had mentioned they intended to reconfigure a second lot and construct a second commercial building. Staff and the applicant worked together to arrive at a revised site plan that demonstrated this. b. The Commission asked whether the elevations submitted with the staff report would also change. The applicant responded that they probably would. Staff added the elevations submitted probably would not meet the requirements of the Architectural Standards Manual (ASM)but staff would work with the applicant on this during the Certificate of Zoning Compliance(CZC). c. Commission discussed hours of operation and whether there would be exterior lighting that would impact the adjacent residences. Applicant responded the hours would be normal Page 8 Page 409 Item#25. office hours between 8AM and 5PM, and any exterior lighting would be downcast and shielded as required by the regulations. 4. Outstandingissue(s)sus)for Council. a. None Page 9 Page 410 Item#25. VII.EXHIBITS A. Annexation Legal Description and Exhibit Map(date 6/26/2020) Legal Description 1625 E. Bentley Dr. — Annexation and Rezone A parcel located in the SW 1%o of Section 17, Township 3 North, Flange 1 East, Boise MV rid ian, Ada County, Idaho. and more particularly described as follows_ Commencing at a Brass Cap monument marling the northwest corner-of said Sly'., from which a Brass Cap monument marking the southwest corner of said SW Yd bears 8 0930'33" W a distance of 2659.46 feet; Thence S 0'30'33T VV along the westerly boundary of said SW'l, a distance of 627.57 feel to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence leaving said westerly boundary S 89457'27" B a distance of 289.31 feet to a paint; I hence N 43'3b'.4b" E a aistance of 34.W feet a point on the centerline of E. Bentley Drive; Thence along Said centerline a distance of 29.5.4 feet along the arc of a 100.00 foot radius non- tangent curve left, said curve having a central angle of 16°55'40' and a long chord bearing 54°51'05' E a distance of 29,41 feet to a 518 inch rebar marking the intersection~ of E. Bentley Drive and S. Truss Place; Thence along the centerline of said S. Truss Place the following described courses: Thence a distance of 56.07 feet along the arc of a 125.95 foot radius non-tangent curve left, said curve having a central angle of 25°42'3T and a long Chord bearing S 13°4945' VV a distance of 55.60 feet to a point; Thence 3 0'58'27"VV a distance of 197.08 feet W a point; Thence leaving said centerline N 69'57'26"W a distance of 272.73 feet to a point on the westerly boundary of said SW Y4: Thence along said westerly boundary N 0'30'33" E a distance of 242.95 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This par l Contains 67,291 square feet (1.55 acres) and is subjeetto any easernents existing or in use. Cliiiton VV, Hansen, PLS Ln,Nos Land Solutions, PC ti s T e ,tune 25, 2020 0 fL OVw Page 10 Page 411 Item#25. 1625 E. BENTLEY DR. - ANNEXATION AND REZONE ONE EHIE3IT 1/4 7d 17 -_ _f« BE117LEY GR.��1 nsx3�a�E .3ftw i k i R1 PARCEL 511173Z5447 ' UWLAITEM POINT DF r BEGINNING—E.OTLEr OR.(ABehOo#D) NQ'M Stl3—'27'E 239.31' f ' erJ 1n,1 — CUM IABLE 1 R LMTH R*14S DELTA BEARING CHORD 19 � TDTAL AREA . 87,291 5F 2%5f l(Aw 16'9 it S'}+' WE am' I (1,55 ACRES) II C2 X07' l2kW 25-W3V S134V4 W 5Ud 1 ¢' P RCa 9111732M79 Sd YPo9" ,ddw' 335112B' ?Iff2315T 512N u # C; 4d,7G 10d0Y MG30-V I S76'3WII$ 1 4&M& a<E � SS 1g5.[r' 1Gd{p' 6110899' N545Yd5`Y 101.SF' I N69'57'26'w 27273' — I I �hFLk11lI] I I I PJF9fF1 51E173S" _ r 1 1F F- OMMM M ❑1 eQ L LA S T 4f" 4 Ldind�iolutions r 4 Land Su ing and Consullin F. za1 t yrreBT.STE b W, yr' MERDAN.ID=42 i206}299-2W CM2M-l!57 W w+rr ceded AA-*44 ' Page 11 Page 412 Gm pa B. Proposed Concept Site Plan(ae730/20 q - � �& ' P9NT OF BEGINNING 22E S895377'E y C54' _ / :4z RNSz9E AREA 9.0\` y�� ] mwm2 ylLEsaYor \ w -« 6 � « • « � G b+ BamNG LOT Cf)N(, \ &2\ : s , . @ m3 , paLGw = aVgy / \ , w waE ; � \ 7 A BLS[K ] T d S aC w¥G = 22.967 2 � «4% \ \ , 7 VJ ° ® \\ y\ ^%�5 SF \ ° . LAND SOLUTIONS y \ y X [Ej' m y . \[ ' r « � � « \ « aoaG+ E ] N 7. � | - �' ' V , 3/ ] _ u R»ITE:D Page !2 �7«a Item#25. C. Proposed Elevations (date: 6/26/2020) 901fIH 9.EVA1lON ion RRq F-kFLM 3OY 1 ..EAST ELEVATION 235 ELEVATION TOP 3O Yew 2 NDfFIFi ELEVATION VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION I. A Development Agreement(DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance,a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the conceptual site plan and conceptual building elevations included in Section VII and the provisions contained herein. b. The existing house shall be removed prior to certificate of occupancy. c. The undeveloped portion of the property shall be seeded with native seed and maintained free of weeds until such a time as future development occurs on that portion. d. The applicant will submit a tree mitigation plan at time of Certificate of Zoning Compliance(CZC). This mitigation plan shall indicate the total number and caliper inches of trees proposed for removal and the total number of replacement trees proposed. e. There shall not be direct access to N. Locust Grove Rd. Page 13 Page 414 Item#25. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. No proposed changes to public sewer infrastructure has been shown within record.Any changes or modifications to the public sewer infrastructure shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. 2. There are two existing water stubs at the northern boundary that either need to be used or abandoned per Meridian Public Works Standards. C. ACHD https://weblink.meridianciV.org/WebLink/DocView.gyp x?id=192567&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Lty D. ADA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES https://weblink.meridianci , .org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=192349&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCi iy IX. FINDINGS A.Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; Commission finds annexation of the subject site with a C-C zoning designation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Commercial FL UM designation for this property. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; Commission finds the proposed office flex building will be consistent with the purpose statement of the commercial districts in that it will support the purpose ofproviding for the service needs of the community, in accordance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; Commission finds that the proposed annexation and zoning should not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. Commission recommends the Council consider any oral or written testimony that may be provided when determining this finding. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and Commission finds that the proposed annexation and zoning will not result in any adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city Commission finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City. Page 14 Page 415 Item#26. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Mayor's Office: Presentation and Discussion of City Survey Results Page 427 Li of Meridian Citeizen u rve • • Survey Report ...helping organizations make better decisions since 1982 2020 11 w Submitted to the City of Meridian, . _ ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier Lane, Olathe, Kansas 66061 August 2020 Page 428 N S T I T l Item#26. Contents Executive Summary....................................................................... i Section 1: Charts and Graphs ...................................................... 1 Section 2: Importance-Satisfaction Analysis ............................. 61 Section 3: Benchmarking Data .................................................. 67 Section 4: GIS Maps................................................................... 78 Section 5: Tabular Data ........................................................... 218 Section 6: Survey Instrument .................................................. 275 Page 429 Item#26. 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Executive Summary Purpose and Methodology ETC Institute administered a survey to residents of the City of Meridian during the summer of 2020. The purpose of the survey was to help the City of Meridian focus planning and budget decisions pertaining to the delivery and quality of services provided.The findings of this survey will help the City better understand citizen use of an satisfaction with City services, programs, and citizen impressions about the performance of the City as a whole. The seven-page survey, cover letter and postage paid return envelope were mailed to a random sample of households in the City of Meridian.The cover letter explained the purpose of the survey and encouraged residents to either return their survey by mail or complete the survey online. At the end of the online survey, residents were asked to enter their home address, this was done to ensure that only responses from residents who were part of the random sample were included in the final survey database. Ten days after the surveys were mailed, ETC Institute sent emails to the households that received the survey to encourage participation. The emails contained a link to the on-line version of the survey to make it easy for residents to complete the survey. To prevent people who were not residents of Meridian from participating,everyone who completed the survey on-line was required to enter their home address prior to submitting the survey. ETC Institute then matched the addresses that were entered on-line with the addresses that were originally selected for the random sample. If the address from a survey completed on-line did not match one of the addresses selected for the sample, the on-line survey was not counted. The goal was to obtain completed surveys from at least 500 residents. The goal was far exceeded, with a total of 704 residents completing the survey. The overall results for the sample of 704 households have a precision of at least +/-3.7% at the 95% level of confidence. This report contains: • An executive summary of the methodology for administering the survey and major findings, • charts showing the overall results for most questions on the survey and trend data from the 2014 and 2017 citizen surveys, • Importance-Satisfaction analysis; this analysis was done to determine priority actions for the City to address based upon the survey results, • benchmarking data that shows how the results for Meridian compare to other communities, • tables that show the results of the random sample for each question on the survey, • a copy of the survey instrument. Page 430 The percentage of"don't know" responses has been excluded from many of the graphs shown in this report to facilitate valid comparisons of the results from Meridian with the results from other communities in ETC Institute's DirectionFinder° database. Since the number of "don't know" responses often reflects the utilization and awareness of city services, the percentage of "don't know" responses has been provided in the tabular data section of this report. When the "don't know" responses have been excluded,the text of this report will indicate that the responses have been excluded with the phrase "who had an opinion." Overall Perceptions of the City Respondents from the City of Meridian were asked to rate items that may influence perceptions of the City. They were asked to use a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor". Ninety-one percent (91%) of the residents surveyed, who had an opinion, indicated the City as a place to raise a family is "excellent" or "good" (rating of 7 to 10 on an 11-point scale). Ninety-one percent (91%) of those surveyed, who had an opinion, indicated that the City as a place to live is "excellent" or"good" (rating of 7 to 10 on an 11-point scale). Residents were least satisfied with the City's ability to provide mobility options other than driving, with 23%giving a rating of"excellent" or "good" (rating of 7 to 10 on an 11-point scale). Overall Quality of Life in the City Overall,86%of the residents surveyed, who had an opinion, indicated that customer service from City employees is exceeding their expectations(rating of 7 to 10 on an 11-point scale). Eighty-five percent(85%)of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, indicated that the overall quality of life in the City exceeds their expectations (rating of 7 to 10 on an 11-point scale. Value Received for City Tax Dollars and Fees Overall, 74% of the residents surveyed, who had an opinion, feel they are getting their money's worth for the value they receive from City tax dollars and fees (rating of 7 to 10 on an 11-point scale). This is a 2% increase from 2017 and a 1% increase from 2014. Page 431 Item#26. Q4. Ratings of the Value Received for City Tax Dollars and Fees - 2014, 2017 & 2020 by percentage of respondents who rated the item a$a 7 to 10 on an 11-point scale,where a rating of 10 meant residents felt they were"definitely getting their money's worth"and a rating of 0 meant residents felt they were"definitely not getting their money's worth"(excluding"don't know") 2014 73% 2017 72% 2020 74%_ 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% t11111lGetting Their Money's Worth(7.10) Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020-Meridian,ID) 0 Overall Quality of Services Provided by the City The major categories of City services that had the highest levels of satisfaction, based upon the combined percentage of 7 to 10 ratings on an 11-point scale among residents who had an opinion, were: fire and rescue services (95%), City parks (92%), police department and law enforcement (89%), and sewer services(88%). For 16 of the 17 major categories of City services that were rated, 50% or more of residents who had an opinion were "very satisfied" or "satisfied." Based on the sum of respondent's top three choices, the City services that residents feel should receive the most emphasis from City leaders over the next two years are: 1) planning and zoning services, 2) police department and law enforcement, and 3) City parks. i Page 432 a � Item#26. Q5. Overall Ratings of City Services - 2014, 2017 & 2020 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10,9,8 or 7 on an 11-point scale(excluding don't knows) F irC/rCy(UC SMYKCS 1 City parks Police department/Law enforcement Sewer services 89% Garbage/trash pick-up services Water services /bQ �Noeaskrd in rota 85% Fire prevention&public education Recreation programs Programs for youth 14 _ 7m Communications Us is Passport Acceptance Agey Not nc asked In 2014 Code enforcement 73% Traffic enforcement 4,7�)1% Recycling services 7JZ& % Budding permit services 57%� % Planning&toning services 1�1& 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% -2014 2017 M 2010 g Source. ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020-Meridian,10) Parks and Recreation Services Ninety-three percent (93%) of respondents, who had an opinion, rated the overall quality, appearance, and maintenance of City parks as either "excellent" or "good" (7 to 10 ratings on an 11-point scale). Other parks and recreation services that residents rated as "excellent" or "good" include: the quality of athletic fields (92%), the number of City parks (89%), and the quality of youth sports programs(77%).The availability of community center and gym facilities was the only item that a majority of respondents did not rate as"excellent" or"good" (7 to 10 ratings on an 11- point scale). Ratings of Public Safety Services Ninety-seven percent (97%) of residents surveyed who had an opinion, rated the quality of Emergency Medical Services as either"excellent"or"good" (rating of 7 to 10 on an 11-point scale). Other public safety services that residents rated as "excellent" or "good" include: fire response time to emergencies (97%), overall quality of local fire protection (96%), police response time to emergencies (94%), and overall feeling of safety in the City (92%). Residents are generally more satisfied with public safety services than they were in 2017. i Page 433 Item#26. Q15. Ratings of Public Safety Services - 2014, 2017 & 2020 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10.9,8 or 7 on an 11-point stale(excluding don't knows) Emergency Medical Services(EMS) 21% F ire response time to emergencies Overall quality of local fire protection 1% Police response time to emergencies gq Overall feeling of safety in City 9� Professionalism of emergency responders % Quality of local police protection 88a6 9 % Location of fire stations st.x,. Safety in City parks Fire safety education programs 7 85% of asked in 201 Fire department public outreach Police safety education programs 72% 7448% Visibility of police in ne ghborhoods 6 7% 0% 20% 4M 60% 80% 200% M 2014 02017 02020 Souse: ETC Institute DllrectionFinder(2020•Meridian,10) e Codes and Ordinances Eighty-eight percent (88%) of respondents, who had an opinion, rated the removal of graffiti as either"excellent"or"good" (7 to 10 ratings on an 11-point scale).Other code enforcement services that residents rated as"excellent"or"good" include: abandoned/junk automobile removal (74%) and illegal dumping(71%). Residents are more satisfied with all aspects of code enforcement than they were in 2017. City Communication Services Eighty-one percent (81%) of respondents, who had an opinion, rated the usefulness of online services on the City website as either"excellent" or "good" (7 to 10 ratings on an 11-point scale). Other city communication services that residents rated as "excellent" or "good" include: the quality of www.meridiancity.org(74%),and effectiveness of communications with the public(73%). More than half (54%) of residents indicated they currently get information about Meridian's services and programs from the City website. Other frequent sources of information include: social media (52%), emails from the City (46%), and flyers in utility bills (41%). Page 434 Item#26. ON Additional Findings ➢ Agreement with Various Statements About the City of Meridian.Eighty-one percent(81%) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, indicated they either "strongly agree" or "agree" that quality shopping and entertainment are accessible in the City of Meridian (rating of 7 to 10 on an 11-point scale). Other statements about the City with the same level of agreement include: quality of housing and a variety of options exist (65%), and Meridian has a sense of community(63%).The lowest level of agreement among residents surveyed, who had an opinion, concerns how wisely the City is managing growth (41%). ➢ Ratings of Services Provided by Other Agency Partners. Eighty-five percent (85%) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, rated the library services provided by the Meridian Library District as either "excellent" or "good" (rating of 7 to 10 on an 11-point scale). Other services provided that residents rated as "excellent" or "good" include: cemetery services offered by Meridian Cemetery Maintenance (82%), elections by the Ada County clerk (76%), and swimming pool by Western Ada Recreation District (71%). ➢ Ratings of Road-Related Projects. Eighty-eight percent (88%) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, rated roadway widening as a "high priority" (rating of 7 to 10 on an 11- point scale). Other road-related projects that residents rated as a "high priority" include: intersection improvements(79%)and pathway/sidewalk connections on local streets(75%). Based on the sum of their top three choices, the transportation improvements that residents feel should receive the most emphasis from City leaders over the next two years are: 1)roadway widening, 2)intersection improvements,and 3)shared bike and pedestrian facilities. ➢ Support of Bond Measure to Fund Road Improvements. Half (50%) of the residents surveyed indicated they would generally support a bond to pay for various roadway and intersection projects in Meridian. Twenty-one percent (21%) would not support a bond, and 29% did not have an opinion. ➢ Importance of Community Issues. Ninety-five percent (95%) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, rated roads,traffic and transportation as a "high priority" (rating of 7 to 10 on an 11-point scale). Other community issues that residents rated as a "high priority" include: education and schools (90%), growth and development (86%), and jobs and economic development (79%). Based on the sum of respondent's top three choices,the community issues that residents indicated should receive the most emphasis from City leaders overthe next three years are: 1) roads, traffic, and transportation, 2) growth and development, and 3) education and schools. Page 435 Item#26. Yr 2- How important are the following community issues? by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-paintscale,wherea ratingof 1Dmeant "high priority'and a rating of 0 meant"nQ priority"�exctuding"don't know') RoadslTraffiOransportatlafl 19% f. Educationl5chods 17% 7% Gr~h{Deweiopment 18% 9% ,• Jobs/Economic Qevelopment 32% 17 4 Pathwaglsidpwalk connectibn% 33% 24% 7% City Tax burden 34% 251/. 8f. ielecornfflunications(cell phon2{intvnO serviceF 31% 24 10% Affordable Housing 29% 21 14% Access to Mental Health Services 28% 23 14% Public Transpartat ion 79% 25% 14Vb Hornele5sness/54xislService5 35 27% 14% 0OWTItOwrt rkeveloPMIMt 32% 30% 16% 0% 20% 40% bo 80% 100:4 W(High Rriority)10-9 M8.7 6-4 m 3.D(No Priority) 5atrrce: i TC�nsxitr�te i7irertiorrfirider� -i4}eridi�n,JJ v Page 436 Item#26. How the City of Meridian Compares to Other Communities Nationally Satisfaction ratings for The City of Meridian rated the same as or above the U.S.average in 42 of the 45 areas that were assessed. The City of Meridian rated significantly higher than the U.S. average (difference of 5% or more) in 39 of these areas. Listed below are the comparisons between the City of Meridian and the U.S. average: Service I Meridian U.S. Difference Category ( .tt Mler:.'•;,ce from City emp:cy.-� 86% 47+; 44+: Quality of Life Swimming pool by Western Ada Recreation D str<• 71% 33% 38% Services Provided by Other Agency Partners Overall value recen•ed for City Laces/fees 74% 37% 37N Quality of Life Overall quality of City services provided 81% 0% 33% Quality of Life Public involvement m local decision making 64% 31% 33% Communication Police response time to emergencies 94% 62% 32% Public Safety Informal-On about City programs&serv<es 71% 42% 29% Communication Quality of athletic fi" 92% 64% 28% Parb and Recreation Sertflon _ Corcmuncat.on: 74% 46% M Overall City Services _ Overall feeling of safetylnW_ 92% 66% 1b', Public Safety Abandoned/lunk automobile removal 74% 49% Code Enforcement Quality of kraal police protection 91% 68% 23+ Public Safety Quality,appearance&maintenanteof City parks 93% 70% 23% Parks and RecreationServkes Fire safetyetltacation programs as —� 62% 23% Public Safety Useful nessofoNi wevicesonCi websae 81% 59% 2_2% Communication Sewer services 88%% —� —66% 1 22% Overall City Services Pol.<e safety education program 74% 52% 22% Public Safety 1 mber of City parks 89% 67% _ 71+; Parks and Recreation Services A•,a due to r.rse a fa • 91% 70% 21% Perceptions Water services 8S% �61%�— 2196 overall City Services Lakeview Golf Course 66% 46% 20% Services Provided by Other Agency Partners Code enforcement 73% S3911, 20% Overall city Services As a place to live 91% 71% 20% Perceptions Clean-up of 62% 42% 20% Code Enforcement Garbage/trash pick-upserrKK 88% 68% 20% OverallOtySemces Weed abatement SS% 36% 19% Code Enforcement Fire response time toemer enKIK 97% 79% 18% Public Safety As a place to work 70% r 54% 26% Perceptions Emergency Medical Services EMS 97% 81% 16% Public Safety Overall quality of local fire protection 96% 81% IS>. Public Safety Quality of youth sports programs 77% 62% 15% Parks and Recreation Servkeis Overall"Ility of kfe in City 0% 72% 13% Quality of Life ws.b.lity of police in ni ighbortwods_ 67% 56% 11% Public Safety The City is moving In the right dreetlon --59% 48% 11% Quality of Life Library services by Meridian Library District 95% i 75% 10% Services Provided by other Agency Partners Animal control 61% S3% 8% Services Provided by Other Agency Partners Quality of pathways for walking&ticking 66% SS% 8% Parks and Recreation Sem<es Traffic enforcement 71% 65% 6% Overall City Services Planning for future growth&devetopmen; SO% 4S% 5% Perceptions Quality of adult sports programs&sporting events S7% SS% 2% Parks and Reaarrtlorl Senfns Recycling services 71% 69% 2% Overall City Services K•12 education by West Ada School District 56% S6% 0% Services Provided by Other Agency Partner All City roads operated by Ada County Highway 46% 48% -2% Services Provided by Other Agency!!Rnees Number of pathways for walking&dicing S396 E 63% •10% Parks and Recreation Services Public transportation services 22% 42% •20% Services Provided by Other Agency PartnNs vi Page 437 Item#26. How the City of Meridian Compares to Other Communities Regionally Satisfaction ratings for The City of Meridian rated the same or above the average for the Mountain Region in 42 of the 45 areas that were assessed. The City of Meridian rated significantly higher than this average (difference of 5% or more) in 39 of these areas. Listed below are the comparisons between The City of Meridian and the average for the Mountain Region of the United States. Differencesefvke Meridian Mountain Region Sv,n,n,.nit pool by Western Ada Recreation District 71% 31% 40% Services Provided�y 00-Apricy Partner Overall value received for City taxes/(ea 74% 40111 34% Quality of life Customer Service from City employees 96% 52% 34% Quality of life Police response time to emergencies 94% 61% 33% Public Safety Quality.appearance R maintenance 0.City parks 93% 61% 1;' Parks and Recreation Services Quality of athletic fields �— 92% 61% y_ 31% Parks and Recreation Services As a place to live 91% 61% 30_% Perceptions l/sefulnessol online servkeson City websrte I 81% 52% 29% Communication Information about City programs&services 71% 43% 28% Communication Clean rid deerlsoa rlvxerxopMy 1 % I- 3�% j 28% CodeEnforcemutt Overall Quality of City sereces provided __81% 54% 27% Quality of life As a place to raise a family, 1 911, 27% Perceptions Police safety cducat,on programs 74% 48% 261 Pubic Safety 6%Lakeview Golf Course —I— 6 41-A _ 25% Servloa Provided by Other Agency Partners Number of City parks 89% 64% 25% Parks and Recreation Services Coft/nlaceno 73% i Oft 1 24% OverandtySemces fire safety educationpro�rams as% 62% _ 23% Public Safety Overall feeling of safety InCky 92% �69% j 23% Public Safety As a place to Mork 70% 47% 23% Perceptions Communications 74% S1% 23% Overall City Services Abandoned/junk automob,'e removal 74% 51% _ 23% Code Enforcement Public involvernent in local decision-making 6% 1 43% _ 21% Communication QWlity of youths oQ fIS programs 77% 57% _ 20% Parks and Recreation Services Quality of lout pol oprotaetim 91% 72% 19%_ Public Safety Weed abatemMt 55% 37% _ JS% Code Enforcement Garbage/trash pick-Wseryka 8111% 7036 18% Overall City Services Library semces by Meridian library District 95% _ 69% _ 16% Services Provided by Other Agency Partners Visibility of pohmin n04060rhoods ISM S2% 15% Pubk . Wilily - Over all Quality of local fire protection 96% 82% _ 14% Public Safety Sewer services 88% I 74% 14% Overall City Services Water services 95% 71% _ 14% Overall City Semces Fire response tlrnatooWANrwoft 9796 I- M 14% Public Safety Emergency Medical Services(EMS) 97% 85% :: Public Safety Overall Qual,ty of lik In Cky >i9% T 10% Quality of life Quality o1 adult sports programs&sporting events 57% 49% 8% Parks and Recreation Services Traffic erdorppEMtt 71% 1 63% 1 8% Overall City Servxes Recycling services 71% 63% 8% Overall City Services Quality of pattwvsytfawlking&bldn 66% 59% 8% Parks and Recreation Services Animal control 61% 55% 6% Services Provided by Other Agency Partner The City is moving in the right direction j 59% 54% 4% Quality of life T Planning for future growth&de-.elopment , 50% 46% 4% Perceptions All City roads operated by Ada Cowtty MWmq lllfyER l 46% 45% 1% Services Provided by Odw A�NEc�AfbMes Number of pathways for waiki &biki 53% 55% -2% Parks and Recreation Services K•12 education by West Ada liChool 04aiet 56% 61% •5% Services Provided by Other Agency Partners Public transportation services 22% 49% -27% Services Provided by Other Agency Partners i Page 438 Item#26. Investment Priorities Recommended Priorities for the Next Two Years. In order to help the City identify investment priorities for the next two years, ETC Institute conducted an Importance-Satisfaction (I-S)analysis. This analysis examined the importance residents placed on each City service and the level of satisfaction with each service. By identifying services of high importance and low satisfaction,the analysis identified which services will have the most impact on overall satisfaction with City services over the next two years. If the City wants to improve its overall satisfaction rating,the City should prioritize investments in services with the highest Importance Satisfaction (I-S) ratings. Details regarding the methodology for the analysis are provided in the Section 2 of this report. Overall Priorities for the City by Major Category. This analysis reviewed the importance of and satisfaction with major categories of City services. This analysis was conducted to help set the overall priorities for the City. Based on the results of this analysis, the major service that is recommended as the top priority for investment over the next two years in order to raise the City's overall satisfaction rating is listed below: o Planning and zoning services (IS Rating = 0.2806) The table below shows the importance-satisfaction rating for all 17 major categories of City services that were rated. ---------------------------------------- 1 1 Importance-Satisfaction Ratin• City of • . Major - • • of Most Importance- Most Important Sati•lactiort Satisfaction Satisfaction I-S Rating categoiry of serAce knporum% Rank % Rank Rating Rank Ven High Priority(IS>.201 Planning&zon,ng services 55% 1 49% 17 0.2906 1 Medium Priority(IS<.101 Traffic enforcement 24% 4 71% 14 0.0689 2 Recycling services 20% 6 71% 15 0.0587 3 Poke departmentlaw enforcement 49% 2 89% 3 0.0567 4 Budding permit services 10% 10 57% 16 0.0445 5 Programs for youth 18% 7 78% 10 0.0396 6 Code enforcement 11% 9 73% 13 0.0287 7 Recreation programs 12% 8 80% 9 0.0230 8 City parks 25% 3 921/6 2 0.0196 9 Communications 7% 12 74% 11 0.0183 10 Fire prevention and public education 7% 11 83% 8 0.0125 11 Fife/Rescue Services 21% 5 95% 1 0.0116 12 Water services 6% 13 85% 6 0.0098 13 Garbapertrash prck•up services 4% 14 88% 5 0.0051 14 tl0ity b&V ser aces 3% 15 83% 7 0.0045 15 Passport Acceptance Agency 1% 17 73% 12 0.0032 16 Sewer seroces 2% 16 88% 4 0.0027 17 Page 439 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Section 1 Charts and Graphs Page 440 ETC Institute (2020) Page City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. . Ratings of Items that Influence Perceptions of Meridian as a Community by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant "excellent" and a rating of 0 meant "poor" (excluding "don't know") As a place to raise a family 435% 7% z As a place to live 49% 42% 8% How well City is ensuring public safety • ' , 39% 1 17% 5% Communication with the community 37% 22% 8% As a place to start/do business ' . 37% 25% 5% As a place to work ' . 35% 25% 6% Building a strong sense of community • ' . 40% 25% 6% Developing a strong local economy : ' . 41% 25% 6% Efforts to maintain quality neighborhoods ' . 39% 22% 12% Efforts to protect the quality of air/water : ' . 37% 24% 11% Developing a strong local workforce 0' . 369/. 35% 10% Developing sustainable/conscious environment 33% I 31% 16% Planning for future growth & development 28% 29% 21% Providing mobility options other than drivingjqor 33% IftP44% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M(Excellent) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Poor) Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 441 ETC Institute (2020) Page City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. . Ratings of Items that Influence Perceptions of Meridian as a Community - 2014, 2017 & 2020 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10, 9, 8 or 7 on an 11-point scale (excluding don't knows) As a place to raise a family 9gg ° 91/ 0 As a place to live + 9 o0 0 How well City is ensuring public safety 7 I30 Communication with the community 58% 0771% 1 As a place to start/do business 67 0 ,, As a place to work 66% 74,o 70% Building a strong sense of community 68/c / 69 O Developing a strong local economy 66%022% 69/o 0 Efforts to maintain quality neighborhoods 66�0% � 7% Efforts to protect the quality of air/water 665 o Developing a strong local workforce 54%4% 1% Developing sustainable/conscious environment 5.5 M.53� 6 Planning for future growth & development 50/ 62%6% o Providing mobility options other than driving 2A 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100 2014 2017 M 2020 Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Trendc Page 442 ETC Institute (2020) Page City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q2. How Well the City and Its Partners are Meeting the Expectations of Residents Related to Quality of life in Meridian by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant "greatly exceeds expectations" and a rating of 0 meant "does not meet my expectations at all" (excluding "don't know") Customer service from City employees . ' . 39% 10% 4% Overall quality of life in City • ' . 46% 13% 3% Overall quality of City services provided ' . 48% 16% 3% Your view of an ideal place to live • ' . 40% 17% 5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M(Greatly Exceeds Expectations) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Does Not Meet Expectations at All) Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 443 ETC Institute (2020) Page City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q2. How Well the City and Its Partners are Meeting the Expectations of Residents Related to Quality of life in Meridian 2014, 2017 & 2020 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10, 9, 8 or 7 on an 11-point scale (excluding don't knows) 78% Customer service from City employees 80% 86% 83% Overall quality of life in City 85% 85% 7�% Overall quality of City services provided 79% 81% 79% Your view of an ideal place to live 82% 79% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2014 2017 M 2020 Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Trendc OF-0-im 444 ETC Institute (2020) Page City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q3. Agreement with Various Statements about the City of Meridian by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant "strongly agree" and a rating of 0 meant "strongly disagree" (excluding "don't know") Quality shopping/entertainment are accessible ' , 36% 15% 4% Quality housing & a variety of options exist 38% 25% 9% Meridian has a sense of community ' . 36% 29% 9% Development in Meridian enhances quality of life . ' . 36% 24% 14% The City continuously improves services ' . 40% 32% 7% The City uses your tax dollars wisely " , 41% 30% 10% The City is headed in right direction ' . 35% 29% 13% Variety of employment opportunities exist ' , 37% 33% 13% The City is managing growth wisely ' . 30% 27% 32% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M(Strongly Agree) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Strongly Disagree) Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 445 ETC Institute (2020) Page City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q3. Agreement with Various Statements about the City of Meridian - 2014, 2017 & 2020 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10, 9, 8 or 7 on an 11-point scale (excluding don't knows) 81 % Quality shopping/entertainment are accessible 85% 81% 83% Quality housing & a variety of options exist 74% 65% 67% Ali= Meridian has a sense of community a 71% 63% 1 74% Development in Meridian enhances quality of life 73% 62% 65% The City continuously improves services 66% 61% 55% The City uses your tax dollars wisely 60% 60% 68% The City is headed in right direction 69% 59% 46 0 Variety of employment opportunities exist 55% 54% 5Q% The City is managing growth wisely 55% 41% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2014 2017 M 2020 Tr C Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 446 ETC Institute (2020) Page City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q4. Ratings of the Value Received for City Tax Dollars and Fees by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant residents felt they were "definitely getting their money's worth" and a rating of 0 meant residents felt they were "definitely not getting their money's worth" (excluding "don't know") 20% 0 10-9 \\8-7 6-4 M 3-2 M 1-0 Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) ETC Institute (2020) Page City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q4. Ratings of the Value Received for City Tax Dollars and Fees - 2014, 2017 & 2020 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 7 to 10 on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant residents felt they were "definitely getting their money's worth" and a rating of 0 meant residents felt they were "definitely not getting their money's worth" (excluding "don't know") 2014 73% 2017 72% 2020 74% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% MGetting Their Money's Worth (7-10) Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 448 ETC Institute (2020) Page City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q5. Overall Ratings of City Services by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant "excellent" and a rating of 0 meant "poor" (excluding "don't know") Fire/Rescue Services ' . 24% 5% City parks ' . 28% 6% z% Police department/law enforcement 26% 8% 4% Sewer services ' . 36% 10% 1° Garbage/trash pick-up services • ' . 32°% 10°% 3% Water services ' . 33% 12% 3% Utility billing services ' . 36% 14% 3% Fire prevention and public education • ' . 34% 14% 30/ Recreation programs ' . 36% 15% 5% Programs for youth 37% 17% 6% Communications . ' , 21% 5% Passport Acceptance Agency ' . 16% 11% Code enforcement : ' . 35% 20% 8% Traffic enforcement PW 36% 20% 9% Recycling services • ' . 33% 19% 10% Building permit services : ' , 29% 23% 20% Planning & zoning services • • , 30% 27% 25% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M(Excellent) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Poor) Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 449 ETC Institute (2020) Page 1 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q5. Overall Ratings of City Services - 2014, 2017 & 2020 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10, 9, 8 or 7 on an 11-point scale (excluding don't knows) �4 Fire/rescue services 91 9501 0 ° City parks �42% Police department/law enforcement � o 9 Sewer services 88% ° Garbage/trash pick-up services � o 7 ° ° Water services 85% i i Fire prevention & public education Not asked in 2014 M10 Recreation rams ro 7q/�n�° programs `8"Os/ ° Programs for youth 74�7��/ Communications 63/Not asked in 2014 %74o � Passport Acceptance Agency 7 4V Code enforcement 64° ° 73 0I Traffic enforcement 7 c1�/ 7 80% Recycling services 71/76% ° Building permit services 57/6 ° Planning & zoning services 49/ /0 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2014 2017 M 2020 Tr C Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) end.. Page 450 ETC Institute (2020) Page 1 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 66. City Services that Residents Felt Should Receive the Most Emphasis from City Leaders Over the Next Two Years by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top THREE choices Planning & zoning services 55% Police department/law enforcement A 49% City parks 25% Traffic enforcement 24/o Fire/Rescue Services 21% Recycling services 20% Programs for youth 18% Recreation programs 12% Code enforcement 11% Building permit services 10% Fire prevention and public education 7% Communications 7% Water services 6% Garbage/trash pick-up services 4% Utility billing services 3% Sewer services 2% Passport Acceptance Agency 1% 0% 20% 40% 60% M 1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 451 ETC Institute (2020) Page 1 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q7. Ratings of Services Provided by Other Agency Partners by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant "excellent" and a rating of 0 meant "poor" (excluding "don't know") Library services by Meridian Library District ' . 33% 12% 3% Cemetery services by Meridian Cemetery Maintenance ' . 34% 13% - Elections by Ada County clerk • ' . 37% 19% 5% Swimming pool by Western Ada Recreation District 22% 7% Cell/mobile/data service by provider in Meridian 38% 19% 11% Programs for seniors at Meridian Senior Center ' . 2% 23% 8% Lakeview Golf Course • ' , 8% 26% 8% Animal control ' . 34% 26% 13% Internet service by telecommunications provider ' . 33% 23% 16% K-12 education by West Ada School District 1 ' . 28% 16% State highways operated by I.T.D. o 33% 20% All roads operated by Ada County Highway District ' . 33% 34% 20% Public transportation services . ' , 16% 36% 42% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M(Excellent) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Poor) Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 452 ETC Institute (2020) Page 1 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q7. Ratings of Services Provided by Other Agency Partners - 2014, 2017 & 2020 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10, 9, 8 or 7 on an 11-point scale (excluding don't knows) Library services by Meridian Library District 43 ON Cemetery services by Meridian Cemetery Maintenance Not asked in 2014 Elections by Ada County clerk Not asked in 2014 7y&% Swimming pool by Western Ada Recreation District Not asked in 2014 27 � 0 Cell/mobile/data service by provider in Meridian Not asked in 2014 65% ° Programs for seniors at Meridian Senior Ctr 69 74r� Lakeview Golf Course o 66% Animal control 56% kfo Internet service by telecommunications provider Not asked in 2014 %o/ K-12 education by Joint School District No. 2 S2 562% Not asked in 2 14 I . State highways operated by I.T.D. % All roads operated by Ada County Highway District =asked2614 Public transportation services 21%22 / % 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100 2014 2017 M 2020 Tr C Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 453 ETC Institute (2020) Page 1 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. . Ratings of the Priority of Various Road-Related Projects Residents Would like to See in Meridian by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant "high priority" and a rating of 0 meant "no priority" (excluding "don't know") Roadway widening ' , 25% 9% 3% Intersection improvements • ' . 30°% 18% 4% Pathways/sidewalk connections on local streets 31% 20% 5% Shared bike & pedestrian facilities • ' . 26% 16% 10% Sidewalks on arterial 31/0 roadways o 23/0 0 0 � 7/o Street lights ' . 37% 22% 8% Beautification/landscaping 32% 28% 12% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% IIIIIIIIIIIII(High Priority) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (No Priority) Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 454 ETC Institute (2020) Page 1 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. . Ratings of the Priority of Various Road-Related Projects Residents Would like to See in Meridian 2014, 2017 & 2020 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10, 9, 8 or 7 on an 11-point scale (excluding don't knows) it 67% Roadway widening 870o "OF= 88% 5 % 7 Intersection improvements 81% MAE 179% 5 Pathways/sidewalk connections on local streets 74Vo 7� 48 Shared bike & pedestrian facilities 70% I 75 50% Sidewalks on arterial roadways 70% 70% i % Street lights 64% mm 69% 3f Beautification/landscaping 551% 60% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2014 2017 M 2020 Trend Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page55 4 ETC Institute (2020) Page 1 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. . Transportation Improvements that Residents Felt Should Receive the Most Emphasis from City leaders Over the Next Two Years by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top THREE choices Roadway widening 80% Intersection improvements 52% Shared bike & pedestrian facilities 45% Pathways/sidewalk connections on local streets 139% i Sidewalks on arterial roadways 25% i Street lights 22% I I Beautification/landscaping 17% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M 1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 456 ETC Institute (2020) Page 1 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q10. Priorities for Future Roadway Construction Projects by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant "high priority" and a rating of 0 meant "no priority" (excluding "don't know") Widen Locust Grove Rd. from Fairview to Ustick Rd. 1 ' , 33% 19% 8% Widen Linder Rd. from Cherry Ln. to Ustick Rd. ' , 28% 20% 10% Widen Ustick Rd. from Ten Mile Rd. to Linder Rd. 29% 20% 10% Construct Linder Rd. overpass over 1-84 25% 18% 14% Widen Victory Rd. from Locust Grove to Eagle Rd. 30% 31% 15% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M(High Priority) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (No Priority) Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 457 ETC Institute (2020) Page 1 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 11. If a bond measure were placed on the ballot requesting funding for road improvement needs, in general would you support a bond to pay for the identified roadway and intersection projects? by percentage of respondents 21% 29% MYes No Don't know Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 458 ETC Institute (2020) Page 1 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q12. Ratings of Parks and Recreation Services by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant "excellent" and a rating of 0 meant "poor" (excluding "don't know") Quality, appearance & maintenance of City parks • ' . 30% 6% - Quality of athletic fields ' . 37% 7%,' Number of City parks A36° 10% z° Quality of youth sports programs • ' . 3 18% �6% Availability of youth sports programs • ' . 36% 19% 7% Quality & variety of special events & festivals 36% 26% 7% Quality of pathways for walking & biking • ' . 40% 24% 10% Number of special events & festivals • ' . 36% 25% 9% Quality & variety of recreation programs & classes 35% 29% 11% Availability of info about recreation programs 32% ' 29% 12% Quality of adult sports programs & sporting events 33% 28% 15% Number of recreation programs & classes 33% 30% 14% Number of adult sports programs & sporting events 32% 28% 16% Number of pathways for walking & biking 36% 31% 16% Availability of community center & gym facilities : ' , 30% 34% 19% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M(Excellent) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Poor) Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 459 ETC Institute (2020) Page 2 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q12. Ratings of Parks and Recreation Services 2014, 2017 & 2020 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10, 9, 8 or 7 on an 11-point scale (excluding don't knows) Quality, appearance & maintenance of City parks 90. ° Quality of athletic fields s %2% Number of City parks /$9% Quality of youth sports programs a A900 Availability of youth sports programs ° Quality/variety of special events & festivals 60% 9A. Quality of pathways for walking & biking �L 66% Number of special events & festivals 61 6 % ° Quality & variety of recreation programs & classes 55 °9R Not asked in 20 4 Availability of info about recreation programs 59�/% Quality of adult sports programs/events �8 Number of recreation programs & classes 53 ° 8 Number of adult sports programs/events �Number of pathways for walking & biking 41% °°53% Availability of community center/gyms 39% 48%52% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2014 2017 M 2020 Tr C Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 460 ETC Institute (2020) Page 2 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 13. In the past 12 months, have you or anyone in your household visited a City of Meridian park? by percentage of respondents a MYes, I have personally visited a City park \\Yes, a household member has visited a City park M No Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 461 ETC Institute (2020) Page 2 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q13. In the past 12 months, have you or anyone in your household visited a City of Meridian park? 2014, 2017 & 2020 by percentage of respondents who answered "yes" (excluding "not provided") 2014 85% 2017 90% 2020 93% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M Yes Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Tre n&Z Page 462 ETC Institute (2020) Page 2 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 14. Ratings of the Sense of Community in Neighborhoods Throughout Meridian by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant "very strong sense of community" and a rating of 0 meant "no sense of community at all" (excluding "don't know") 6% 8% 27% 01 M 10-9 (very strong sense of community) 8-7 6-4 M 3-2 F 1-0 (no sense of community at all) Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 463 ETC Institute (2020) Page 2 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q14. Ratings of the Sense of Community in Neighborhoods Throughout Meridian - 2014, 2017 & 2020 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 7 to 10 on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant residents felt a "very strong sense of community" and a rating of 0 meant residents felt "no sense of community at all" (excluding "don't know") 2014 59% 2017 54% 2020 159% 0% 20% 40% 60% MStrong Sense of Community (7-10) Tre.n dc Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 464 ETC Institute (2020) Page 2 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q15. Ratings of Public Safety Services by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant "excellent" and a rating of 0 meant "poor" (excluding "don't know") Quality of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) • ' 18 jo 2° How quickly fire department responds to 911 emerge 16% ° Overall quality of the fire department : ' 18% 13% How quickly police respond to 911 emergencies 1 ' . 24% 3%4' Overall feeling of safety in the City ' 35% 6% 2% Professionalism of employees responding to emergen 25% 5%4% Quality of local police protection . 28% 5% - Current location of fire stations . 1 ' . 31% 8% 1° Safety in city parks ' 32% 9% 2. Fire safety education programs ' 33% 11% 4% Fire department public outreach 31% 15% 7% Police safety education programs 18100 34% 17% 9% The visibility of police in neighborhoods 34% 22% 11% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M(Excellent) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Poor) Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 465 ETC Institute (2020) Page 2 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final E #26. 15. Ratings of Public Safety Services - 2014, 2017 & 2020 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10, 9, 8 or 7 on an 11-point scale (excluding don't knows) 91% Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 49 0 90% Fire response time to emergencies 9 49° / 0 91% Overall quality of local fire protection 949° 0 86% Police response time to emergencies % 94511 Overall feeling of safety in City 91% 92% 87% Professionalism of emergency responders 9% 92% 88% Quality of local police protection 899% 86% Location of fire stations 90% 91% Safety in City parks 84 88% 89% Fire safety education programs 77%81% 85% Not asked in 2014 Fire department public outreach 78% 79% Police safety education programs 72/ 78% 74% 0 61/ Visibility of police in neighborhoods 62% 67% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2014 2017 M 2020 Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Trendc Page 466 ETC Institute (2020) Page 2 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q16. Ratings of the Enforcement of City Codes and Ordinances by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant "excellent" and a rating of 0 meant "poor" (excluding "don't know") Removal of graffiti ' . 36% 9% 3° Abandoned/junk automobile removal • ' . 35% 17% 10% Illegal dumping 30% 21% 9% Dilapidated houses or buildings 38% 26% 10% Clean-up of litter and debris on private property 34% 24% 15% 0 0 0 Weed abatement 1 35/0 27/0 18/0 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M(Excellent) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Poor) Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 467 ETC Institute (2020) Page 2 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q16. Ratings of the Enforcement of City Codes and Ordinances - 2014, 2017 & 2020 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10, 9, 8 or 7 on an 11-point scale (excluding don't knows) 79% Removal of graffiti 81% 88% 67% Abandoned/junk automobile removal 65% 74% 64% Illegal dumping 66% 71% 54% Dilapidated houses or buildings 530� 65% 55�/o Clean-up of litter/debris on private property 52% 62% 510/ Weed abatement 539/ 5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2014 2017 M 2020 Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) ME Page 468 ETC Institute (2020) Page 2 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q17. Do you have a working smoke detector in your home? by percentage of respondents 2% MYes No Don't know Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 469 ETC Institute (2020) Page 3 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q17. Do you have a working smoke detector in your home? 2014, 2017 & 2020 by percentage of respondents who answered "yes" 2014 8% 2017 9 2020 9 % 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% MYes Tre n dc Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 470 ETC Institute (2020) P773 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q18. Ratings of the City's Communication Services by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant "excellent" and a rating of 0 meant "poor" (excluding "don't know") Usefulness of online services on City website 37% 15% 4% Quality of www.meridiancity.org ' , 40% 20% 6% Effectiveness of City communications with 38/0 22/0 5/0, o 0 0 the public Quality of information about City programs & 38% 22% 7% services Opportunities for public involvement in local 37% 24% 12% decision making 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M(Excellent) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Poor) Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 471 ETC Institute (2020) Page 3 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q18. Ratings of the City's Communication Services 2014, 2017 & 2020 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10, 9, 8 or 7 on an 11-point scale (excluding don't knows) 66% Usefulness of online services on City website 80% 81% MEML; 746/o Quality of www.meridiancity.org 74°l0 I& 52% Effectiveness of communications w/ public 70% 73%o 59% Information about City programs & services 72% 71% 52% Public involvement in local decision-making 60% 64% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2014 2017 M 2020 Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) ME Page 472 ETC Institute (2020) Page 3 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q19. Where do you currently get information about Meridian 's services and programs? by percentage of respondents (multiple choices could be made) City website 54% Social media 52% Emails from City 46% Flyers in utility bills 41% Television/news 31% Newspaper 15%d I Information booklets/City publications 11% Radio 11% Events such as Coffee with Mayor, Town Halls 4% Other 2% 0% 20% 40% 60% Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 473 ETC Institute (2020) Page 3 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q19. Where do you currently get information about Meridian 's services and programs? - 2014, 2017 & 2020 by percentage of respondents (multiple choices could be made) 42% City website 48% 54% Not asked in 2014 Social media 47% 52% 1 Emails from City 21% 46% 56° Flyers in utility bills =4194o49% OMRO 50% Television/news 31 47% % 42% Newspaper 15 27% °/d I 19% Information booklets/City publications 17% 11% II I 17% Radio 20% If 3% Events such as Coffee with Mayor, Town Halls 6, 4% 0% 20% 40% 60 2014 12017 M 2020 Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Trendc Page 474 ETC Institute (2020) Page 3 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 0. Did you visit downtown Meridian at least once during the past year for a purpose other than work? by percentage of respondents 2% 13% MYes No Don't remember Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 475 ETC Institute (2020) Page 3 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item 410. Did you visit downtown Meridian at least once during the past year for a purpose other than work? 2014, 2017 & 2020 by percentage of respondents who answered "yes" 2014 85 2017 88% 2020 85 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100 MYes Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Tre n d-c Page 476 ETC Institute (2020) Page 3 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 20a . When you think about Downtown, why didn't you visit in the last year? by percentage of respondents who did not visit Downtown during the past year 2% 27% 35% 12% 22% Lack of parking Lack of open space Not enough variety of shopping Not enough variety of restaurants Lack of walkability Not provided Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 477 ETC Institute (2020) Page 3 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 21. In general, would you favor or oppose allowing residents of a city the ability to vote on a temporary sales tax (local option tax) increase to provide funding for identified infrastructure improvements in the community? by percentage of respondents 23% 35% M Favor Oppose Not sure Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 478 ETC Institute (2020) Page 3 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 22. How important are the following community issues? by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant "high priority" and a rating of 0 meant "no priority" (excluding "don't know") Roads/Traffic/Transportation . ' 19% 3%2% Education/Schools ' , 17% 7% 3% Growth/Development 18°% 9% 5% Jobs/Economic Development 32% 17% 40X Pathway/sidewalk connections . ' 33% 24% 7% City Tax burden ' , 25% 8% Telecommunications (cell phone/internet service) 24% 10% Affordable Housing ' , 2W 21% 14% Access to Mental Health Services ' , 28% 23% 14% Public Transportation 29% 25% 14% Homelessness/Social Services 35% 27% 14% Downtown redevelopment 329/0 30% 16% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M(High Priority) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (No Priority) Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 479 ETC Institute (2020) Page 4 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q22. How important are the following community issues? 2017 vs. 2020 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10, 9, 8 or 7 on an 11-point scale (excluding don't knows) Roads/Traffic/Transportation 9 % 9 Education/Schools 90% 90% Growth/Development 82�° 86% Jobs/Economic Development o 5% MM 79% Pathway/sidewalk connections 69 0° 69 City Tax burden 61% o 67% Telecommunications (cell phone/internet service) 64% 66% Affordable Housing 54% o 66% Access to Mental Health Services 63% 64% Public Transportation 65% 61/o Homelessness/Social Services 56% 59% Downtown redevelopment 54%o 64% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2017 M 2020 Tr C Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 480 ETC Institute (2020) Page 4 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q23. Which three priorities should receive the most emphasis from City leaders over the next three years? by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top THREE choices Roads/traffic/transportation 70% Growth/development 56% Education/schools 549� Affordable housing 40" �7% Jobs/economic development 17% Pathway/sidewalk connections 15%o Public transportation 139/1 City tax burden 10% Access to mental health services 10% Telecommunications (cell phone/internet service) 9% Downtown redevelopment 8% Homelessness/social services 6% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% M 1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 481 ETC Institute (2020) Page 4 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q24. In the last six months, have you sought City services that required you to conduct business with the City online or remote? by percentage of respondents (excluding "not provided") 84 MYes No Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 482 ETC Institute (2020) Page 4 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q24a . Ratings of Quality of Various Services Received by percentage of respondents who conducted business with the City online/remotely in the last 6 months and rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant "excellent" and a rating of 0 meant "poor" (excluding "don't know") Online License Renewal Services (Alcohol, 30% 13% 8% Dog Licenses, Passports) Building Permit Plan Review Services 1 ' . 36% 12% 12% Development Application Submittal Services 1 ' . 25°% 19% 6% City Council Public Hearing & Testimony Services ' . 13% 16% 10% Building Inspection Services 15% 15% 19% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% IIIIIIIIIIIII(Excellent) 10-9 18-7 6-4 3-0 (Poor) Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 483 ETC Institute (2020) Page 4 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 5. How important are the following housing affordability issues? by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant "high priority" and a rating of 0 meant "no priority" (excluding "don't know") Participate in State discussions on property tax 29% 18% 5% legislation Develop design standards for affordable housing 28% 21% 14% elements Require certain quantity of units in development 22% 23% 26% projects to have affordable housing elements Increase development densities via duplexes, apartments, townhomes, and other multi-family 17% 20% 49% designs Provide reduced development standards for 15% 26% 47% projects containing affordable housing elements 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M(High Priority) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (No Priority) Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 484 ETC Institute (2020) Page 4 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q26. Ratings of level of Effort in Enforcement of the Following Public Safety and Traffic Areas by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant "excellent" and a rating of 0 meant "poor" (excluding "don't know") Handheld use of cell phones/texting while driving ' . 26% 17% 23% O o 0 Speeding on arterial roads 29/ 27/0 23/ Red light violations ' . 26% 25% 27% o 0 0 Speeding in neighborhoods 1 27/0 26/ 27/0 Tailgating ' . 23% 31% 32% 3 0 0 0 Excessive motor vehicle sound 18/0 31/0 34/ 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M(Excellent) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Poor) Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 485 ETC Institute (2020) Page 4 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q27. Do you feel the level of police presence in your neighborhood is sufficient, ensuring that Meridian communities remain a safe place for citizens? by percentage of respondents 15% 22% MYes No Not sure Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 486 ETC Institute (2020) Page 4 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q29. Gender of Respondents by percentage of respondents �o 50% M Male Female Not provided Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 487 ETC Institute (2020) Page 4 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q30. Age of Respondents by percentage of respondents 20% 21% 20% 21� M 18-34 35-44 45-54 M 55-64 65+ Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 488 ETC Institute (2020) Page 4 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q31. Which of the following best describes the home in which you live? by percentage of respondents 4% 1° MA detached single-family house An apartment or condominium Townhouse or duplex Not provided Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 489 ETC Institute (2020) Page 5 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q32. Do you own or rent your home? by percentage of respondents 13% M Own Rent Don't know Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 490 ETC Institute (2020) Page 5 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q33. How many years and months have you lived in Meridian ? by percentage of respondents Years Months 1pppppp 11% / 12% 14 12% 11% ������. 19% 11% 15% M5 or less 6 to 10 11 to 15 M0 1 2 M3 M4 %/5 M 16 to 20 21 to 30 M 31+ %/i 6 M 7 8 i/9 10+ Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 491 ETC Institute (2020) Page 5 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q34. Ages of Household Occupants by percentage of respondents 5% 10� 10% /Under age 5 Ages 5-9 Ages 10-14 MAges 15-17 MAges 18+ Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 492 ETC Institute (2020) Page 5 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q35. Does your household have a dog? by percentage of respondents 50% Q35a. How many dogs do you have in your household? Yes No FPPPPPW- 66% 29% MOne Two Three Four or more Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 493 ETC Institute (2020) Page 5 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q35. Does your household have a dog? by percentage of respondents 50% Q35b. Do you know that Meridian requires dogs to be licensed annually? Yes No 26% MYes No Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 494 ETC Institute (2020) Page 5 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q36. Which of the following best describes your current employment status? by percentage of respondents Employed full time 52.3% Retired 25.4% Self-employed 8.1% Employed part time 5.8% Not employed outside home, a homemaker 5.6% Not employed, but seeking work 1.2% Not employed due to a disability 0.4% A student working part time 0.4% Not employed, but not seeking work 0.4% Other 0.4% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 495 ETC Institute (2020) Page 5 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 37. What is the approximate total annual family income of all members of your household ? by percentage of respondents 16% 18% 7% 5% 12% 10% Less than $20K $20K-$34,999 $35K-$49,999 $50K-$74,999 M$75K-$99,999 $100K-$149,999 $150K-$199,999 M$200K+ Not sure Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 496 ETC Institute (2020) Page 5 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q38. How do you make and receive phone calls? by percentage of respondents 0 16% A04J X, Landline MCell phone Both Not provided Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 497 ETC Institute (2020) Page 5 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q38a . Do you primarily use your cell phone, landline or both to make and receive calls? by percentage of respondents who use both a landline and cell phone to make and receive phone calls 16% 44% MCell phone Landline Both Not provided Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 498 ETC Institute (2020) Page 5 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q38b. Who is your cell phone service provider? by percentage of respondents who use a cell phone to make and receive phone calls 13% 5% 14% 20 8% 001p"r MVerizon AT&T T-Mobile Sprint Other Not provided Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder(2020 - Meridian, ID) Page 499 ETC Institute (2020) Page 6 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Section 2 Importance-Satisfaction Analysis Page 500 ETC Institute (2020) Page 6 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Importance-Satisfaction Analysis City of Meridian, Idaho Overview Today, City officials have limited resources which need to be targeted to activities that are of the most benefit to their citizens. Two of the most important criteria for decision making are (1) to target resources toward services of the highest importance to citizens; and (2) to target resources toward those services where citizens are the least satisfied. The Importance-Satisfaction (IS) rating is a unique tool that allows public officials to better understand both of these highly important decision making criteria for each of the services they are providing. The Importance-Satisfaction rating is based on the concept that public agencies will maximize overall customer satisfaction by emphasizing improvements in those areas where the level of satisfaction is relatively low and the perceived importance of the service is relatively high. Overview The rating is calculated by summing the percentage of responses for items selected as the first, second, and third most important services for the City to provide. The sum is then multiplied by 1 minus the percentage of respondents who indicated they were positively satisfied with the City's performance in the related area (the sum of the ratings of 4 and 5 on a 5-point scale excluding "Don't Know" responses). "Don't Know" responses are excluded from the calculation to ensure the satisfaction ratings among service categories are comparable. [IS=Importance x(1-Satisfaction)]. Example of the Calculation: Respondents were asked to identify the major categories of city services they thought should receive the most emphasis over the next two years. Fifty-five percent (54.7%) of respondents selected planning & zoning services as one of the most important services for the City to provide. With regard to satisfaction, 48.7% of respondents surveyed rated the City's overall performance in planning & zoning services as a 7 to 10 on an 11-point scale (where "10" means "Excellent") excluding "Don't Know" responses. The I-S rating was calculated by multiplying the sum of the most important percentages by 1 minus the sum of the satisfaction percentages. In this example 54.7%was multiplied by 51.3% (1-0.487). This calculation yielded an I-S rating of 0.2806, which ranked first out of 17 major service categories. The maximum rating is 1.00 and would be achieved when 100% of the respondents select an item as one of their top three choices to emphasize over the next two years and 0% indicate they are positively satisfied with the delivery of the service. The lowest rating is 0.00 and could be achieved under either of the following two situations: Page 501 ETC Institute (2020) Page 6 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. • If 100%of the respondents were positively satisfied with the delivery of the service • If none (0%) of the respondents selected the service as one for the three most important areas for the City to emphasize over the next two years. Interpreting the Ratings Ratings that are greater than or equal to 0.20 identify areas that should receive significantly more emphasis over the next two years. Ratings from 0.10 to 0.20 identify service areas that should receive increased emphasis. Ratings less than 0.10 should continue to receive the current level of emphasis. • Definitely Increase Emphasis (IS>=0.20) • Increase Current Emphasis (0.10<=IS<0.20) • Maintain Current Emphasis (IS<0.10) The results for the City of Meridian are provided on the following page. Page 502 ETC Institute (2020) Page 6 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 2020 Importance-Satisfaction • City of Meridian Mawor Categoriesof Citv Services Most Importance- Most Important Satisfaction Satisfaction Category of Service Important% Rank Satisfaction% Rank Rating I-S Rating Rank Very High Priority(IS>.20) Planning&zoning services 55% 1 49% 17 0.2806 1 Medium Priority(IS<.10) Traffic enforcement 24% 4 71% 14 0.0689 2 Recycling services 20% 6 71% 15 0.0587 3 Police department/law enforcement 49% 2 89% 3 0.0567 4 Building permit services 10% 10 57% 16 0.0445 5 Programs for youth 18% 7 78% 10 0.0396 6 Code enforcement 11% 9 73% 13 0.0287 7 Recreation programs 12% 8 80% 9 0.0230 8 City parks 25% 3 92% 2 0.0196 9 Communications 7% 12 74% 11 0.0183 10 Fire prevention and public education 7% 11 83% 8 0.0125 11 Fire/Rescue Services 21% 5 95% 1 0.0116 12 Water services 6% 13 85% 6 0.0098 13 Garbage/trash pick-up services 4% 14 88% 5 0.0051 14 Utility billing services 3% 15 83% 7 0.0045 15 Passport Acceptance Agency 1% 17 73% 12 0.0032 16 Sewer services 2% 16 88% 4 0.0027 17 Note: The I-S Rating is calculated by multiplying the"Most Important"%by(1-'Satisfaction'%) Most Important%: The"Most Important"percentage represents the sum of the first,second,and third most important responses for each item. Respondents were asked to identify the items they thought should be the City's top priorities. Satisfaction%: The"Satisfaction"percentage represents the sum of the ratings 10,9,8,and 7 excluding don't knows.' Respondents ranked their level of satisfaction with each of the items on a scale of 10 to 0,with 10 being"Excellent"and 0 being"Poor." ©2020 DirectionFinder by ETC Institute Page 503 ETC Institute (2020) Page 6 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Importance-Satisfaction Matrix Analysis • The Importance-Satisfaction rating is based on the concept that public agencies will maximize overall customer satisfaction by emphasizing improvements in those areas where the level of satisfaction is relatively low and the perceived importance of the service is relatively high. ETC Institute developed an Importance-Satisfaction Matrix to display the percei importance of major services that were assessed on the survey against the perceived quality of service delivery. The two axes on the matrix represent Satisfaction (vertical) and relative Importance (horizontal). The I-S (Importance-Satisfaction) matrix should be interpreted as follows. • Continued Emphasis (above average importance and above average satisfaction). This area shows where the City is meeting customer expectations. Items in this area have a significant impact on the customer's overall level of satisfaction. The City should maintain (or slightly increase) emphasis on items in this area. • Exceeding Expectations (below average importance and above average satisfaction). This area shows where the City is performing significantly better than customers expect the City to perform. Items in this area do not significantly affect the overall level of satisfaction that residents have with City services. The City should maintain (or slightly decrease) emphasis on items in this area. • Opportunities for Improvement (above average importance and below average satisfaction). This area shows where the City is not performing as well as residents expect the City to perform. This area has a significant impact on customer satisfaction, and the City should DEFINITELY increase emphasis on items in this area. • Less Important (below average importance and below average satisfaction). This area shows where the City is not performing well relative to the City's performance in other areas; however, this area is generally considered to be less important to residents. This area does not significantly affect overall satisfaction with City services because the items are less important to residents. The agency should maintain current levels of emphasis on items in this area. A matrix showing the results for the City of Meridian is provided on the following page. Page 504 ETC Institute (2020) Page 6 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Importance-Satisfaction Assessment Matrix -City Services- (points on the graph show deviations from the mean importance and satisfaction ratings given by respondents to the survey) mean importance Exceeded Expectations Continued Emphasis lower importance/higher satisfaction higher importance/higher satisfaction Recreation programs •Fire/rescue services Garbage/trash pick-up services •City parks Sewer services 1 Police department/Law enforcement* a Water services• CC Utility billing services4,1 • r O O Fire prevention& public educationtj O a V Communicati 4Q •Programs for youth H pns a Passport Acceptance Agency• t *Traffic enforcement •� Code enforcement / Q Re cling services Building permit services* Planning&zoning services. Less Important Opportunities for Improvement lower importance/lower satisfaction higher importance/lower satisfaction RNMO ' ' W Importance Rating mn�' ' Source: ETC Institute (2020) Page 505 ETC Institute (2020) Page 6 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Section 3 Benchmarking Data Page 506 ETC Institute (2020) Page 6 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Benchmarking Summary Report City of Meridian, Idaho ETC Institute's DirectionFinder program was originally developed in 1999 to help community leaders across the United States use statistically valid community survey data as a tool for making better decisions. Since November of 1999, the survey has been administered in more than 230 cities in 43 states. Most participating cities conduct the survey on an annual or biennial basis. This report contains benchmarking data from two sources: (1) a national survey that was administered by ETC Institute during the summer of 2019 to a random sample of more than 4,000 residents across the United States and (2) a regional survey administered to 376 residents living in the Mountain Region of the United States during the summer of 2019. The Mountain Region includes residents living in Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Colorado, and Idaho. The charts on the following pages show how the overall results for Meridian compare to the United States national and regional averages based on the results of the 2019 survey that was administered by ETC institute to a random sample of over 4,000 residents across the United States, and the regional survey administered to 376 residents living in the Mountain Region of the United States. Meridian's results are shown in blue, the Mountain Region averages are shown in red, and the National averages are shown in yellow. Page 507 ETC Institute (2020) Page 6 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Nat 'ional Note: The benchmarking data contained in this report is protected intellectual property. Any reproduction of the benchmarking information in this report by persons or organizations not directly affiliated with the City of Meridian is not authorized without written consent from ETC Institute. Page 508 ETC Institute (2020) Page 6 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Ratings of Items that Influence Perceptions of the City Meridian vs. Mountain Region vs. the U.S. by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don't knows) 91% As a place to raise a family 6 4% 70% 191% As a place to live 61% 71% 70% As a place to work jjjjjjj�47 ��� % 54% 50% Planning for future growth & development 46% 45% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M Meridian M Mountain Region U.S. Source: 2020 ETC Institute Page 509 ETC Institute (2020) Page 7 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Ratings of Items Related to Quality of Life Meridian vs. Mountain Region vs. the U.S. by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don't knows) 86% Customer service from City employees 52% 42% 85% Overall quality of life in City JW705%o 72% 81% Overall quality of City services provided 54% 48 74�o Overall value received for City taxes/fees 40% 37% 159% The City is moving in the right direction 54% 48% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% MMeridian Mountain Region U.S. Source: 2020 ETC Institute Page 510 ETC Institute (2020) Page 7 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Overall Ratings of City Services Meridian vs. Mountain Region vs. the U.S. by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don't knows) 88% Sewer services 74% 66% 88 Garbage/trash pick-up services 70% 68% 85% Water services 71% 64% 74% Communications 51% 46% 73% Code enforcement 49% 53% 71% Traffic enforcement �63 65% 71% Recycling services 63% 69% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M Meridian M Mountain Region U.S. Source: 2020 ETC Institute Page 511 ETC Institute (2020) Page 7 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. stings of Services Provided by Other Governmental Entities, Agencies and Groups Meridian vs. Mountain Region vs. the U.S. by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don't knows) 85% Library services by Meridian Library District i 69% 75I% 71% Swimming pool by Western Ada Recreation District 31% 330� 66% Lakeview Golf Course 41% 46% 61% Animal control 55% 53% 56% K-12 education by West Ada School District qmilm61% 56% 46% All City roads operated by Ada County Highway Dist 45% 48% 22% Public transportation services 49% 42% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% MMeridian Mountain Region U.S. Source: 2020 ETC Institute Page 512 ETC Institute (2020) Page 7 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Ratings of Parks and Recreation Services Meridian vs. Mountain Region vs. the U.S. by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don't knows) 93° Quality, appearance & maintenance of City parks 61% 70% 92° Quality of athletic fields 61% 64% 89% Number of City parks 64% 67% Quality of youth sports programs 57% 7I7 62% 66% Quality of pathways for walking & biking 8% 8% �7% Quality of adult sports programs & sporting events 49% 55% 53% Number of pathways for walking & biking 55b/ 63% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% MMeridian Mountain Region U.S. Source: 2020 ETC Institute Page 513 ETC Institute (2020) Page 7 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Ratings of Public Safety Services Meridian vs. Mountain Region vs. the U .S. by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don't knows) 9 Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 85% 81% 9 Fire response time to emergencies 83% 79% 9 Overall quality of local fire protection 82% 81% 94° Police response time to emergencies 61% 62% 92% Overall feeling of safety in City 69% 66% 91% Quality of local police protection 72% 68% 85% Fire safety education programs 62% 62% 745� Police safety education programs 48% 52% Visibility of police in neighborhoods 52% 67% 5 % 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% MMeridian Mountain Region U.S. Source: 2020 ETC Institute Page 514 ETC Institute (2020) Page 7 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Ratings of the Enforcement of Codes and Ordinances Meridian vs. Mountain Region vs. the U .S. by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don't knows) 70✓o Abandoned/junk automobile removal 51% 48% I 62% Clean-up of litter/debris on private property 34 o 42% I 5� Weed abatement 37, 36% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M Meridian Mountain Region U.S. Source: 2020 ETC Institute Page 515 ETC Institute (2020) Page 7 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Ratings of Communication Services Meridian vs. Mountain Region vs. the U .S. by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don't knows) 81% Usefulness of online services on City website 52% 59% 71%I Information about City programs & services 43% 42% 64% Public involvement in local decision-making 43% 31% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% MMeridian Mountain Region U.S. Source: 2020 ETC Institute Page 516 ETC Institute (2020) Page 7 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Section 4 GIS Maps Page 517 ETC Institute (2020) Page 7 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Location of Survey Respondents 74. lk .+ � fir• ,� i,. w 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Page 518 ETC Institute (2020) Page 7 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q1.1 Rating Meridian: As a place to live Cr { Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale - 0 - 2 Poor 0-.1 0 F2 -4 Below Average F4 - 6 Neutral I _j ❑ 6 - 8 Good 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE x .. "- 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 519 ETC Institute (2020) Page 8 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q1.2 Rating Meridian: As a place to work Ld rp o . , i d ICU Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor O F2 -4 Below Average Ilia F 4 - 6 Neutral I J a 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 520 ETC Institute (2020) Page 8 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q1.3 Rating Meridian: As a place to raise a family HE _• r'N' 4 - �_� 1 ! + = nil do n � J R I' 1 Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale 0 - 2 Poor E2 -4 Below Average 4 - 6 Neutral � C a 6 - 8 Good - 8 - 10 Excellent 64`' No Response ETC INSTITUTE �. .. 4 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 521 ETC Institute (2020) Page 8 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q1.4 Rating Meridian: As a place to start/do business +- - _ i --PO pal- I43. CL o I Perception _ Mean rating on an 11-point scale 0 - 2 Poor Y Vt 13 F2 -4 Below Average F 4 - 6 Neutral ❑ 6 - 8 Good �� Eb - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE , .. 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 522 ETC Institute (2020) Page 8 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q1.5 Rating Meridian: As a city that is building a strong sense of community Lij rp- o . Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale — �' ' c - 0 - 2 Poor O F2 -4 Below Average F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 523 ETC Institute (2020) Page 8 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q1.6 Rating Meridian: As a city that is developing a strop local economy . o . 6�b d b w. '= Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale - 0 - 2 Poor F2 -4 Below Average F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 524 ETC Institute (2020) Page 8 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final 1.7 Rating Meridian: As a city that is developing a strong local workforce that can compete in today's economic climate o . db ir b 9 L--- Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale — �' ' c - 0 - 2 Poor T M � �d F 2 -4 Below Average ,; F 4 - 6 Neutral I J ❑ 6 - 8 Good 8 - 10 Excellent _ No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 525 ETC Institute (2020) Page 8 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q1.8 Rating Meridian: As a city that is planning for future growth and development F � - - r' - . P_ o . �b b 9 Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale c - 0 - 2 Poor + F2 -4 Below Average Pb F4 - 6 Neutral I J r3 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 526 ETC Institute (2020) Page 8 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q1.9 Rating Meridian: As a city that is developing a sustainable and conscious environment LLI o _ db t Perception - Mean rating on an 11-point scale — '' - 0 - 2 Poor "IN Op F2 -4 Below Average F L? u 4 - 6 Neutral � r3 6 - 8 Good - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 527 ETC Institute (2020) Page 8 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final ite,r,#26. Ratin Meridian: How well the it is Q1.10 g City protecting the quality of the air and water o . db ",_j qw. _ -;, . b 9 Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor i F2 -4 Below Average F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 528 ETC Institute (2020) Page 8 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. i Q1.11 Rating Meridian: How well the City s maintaining high quality neighborhoods Ld P_ o . ;�&d b V . I., Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — c - 0 - 2 Poor i F2 -4 Below Average F 4 - 6 Neutral I J ❑ 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 529 ETC Institute (2020) Page 9 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. i Q1.12 Rating Meridian: How well the City s providing options for mobility other than driving rp- o . db Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale c - 0 - 2 Poor + O F2 -4 Below Average F 4 - 6 Neutral I J ❑ d 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ ¢� No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 530 ETC Institute (2020) Page 9 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final ,E#26. .13 Rating Meridian: How well the City is ensuring public safety o . db Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor + d F2 -4 Below Average F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 531 ETC Institute (2020) Page 9 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q1.14 Rating Meridian: How well the City is communicating with the community - - - `; rp- o . db 4 Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — �' ' c - 0 - 2 Poor i F2 -4 Below Average F 4 - 6 Neutral I J ❑ 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 532 ETC Institute (2020) Page 9 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q2.1 Expectation of: Overall quality of life in the City J9 g o i Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale 0 - 2 Doesn't Meet Expectations at All E2 -4 Doesn't Exceed Expectations ! _j C� 4 - 6 Neutral a f C� 6 - 8 Exceeds Expectations �<� - _ 8 - 10 Greatly Exceeds Expectations No Response ETC INSTITUTE N 1 i 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 533 ETC Institute (2020) Page 9 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q2.2 Expectation of: Overall quality of city services provided rp- Ld ly!�. � 9 Perception L Mean rating on an 11-point scale i . 0 - 2 Doesn't Meet Expectations at All E2 -4 Doesn't Exceed Expectations J C� 4 - 6 Neutral �' _ C� 6 - 8 Exceeds Expectations _ 8 - 10 Greatly Exceeds Expectations No Response ETC INSTITUTE N r i 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 534 ETC Institute (2020) Page 9 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q2.3 Expectation of: Overall quality of customer service you receive from city employees- -rp- b �Ro r AM. -i Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale ; �= 1 0 - 2 Doesn't Meet Expectations at All E2 -4 Doesn't Exceed Expectations ! _j C� 4 - 6 Neutral C� 6 - 8 Exceeds Expectations _ 8 - 10 Greatly Exceeds Expectations No Response ETC INSTITUTE N 1 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 535 ETC Institute (2020) Page 9 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q2.4 Expectation of: Your view of an ideal place to live rp- Perception L Mean rating on an 11-point scale 0 - 2 Doesn't Meet Expectations at All 2 -4 Doesn't Exceed Expectations J C� 4 - 6 Neutral r3 C� 6 - 8 Exceeds Expectations _ 8 - 10 Greatly Exceeds Expectations No Response ETC INSTITUTE N 1 i 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 536 ETC Institute (2020) Page 9 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q3.1 Agreement with: Quality housing and a variety of options- exist in Meridian P_ o . db El I ICU g Agreement Mean rating on an 11-point scale L ' c - 0 - 2 Strongly Disagree E J 2 -4 Disagree F1 4 - 6 Neutral ❑ - 6 - 8 Agree r -- - 8 - 10 Strongly Agree _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 537 ETC Institute (2020) Page 9 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q3.2 Agreement with: Development in the City enhances the ualit of life o . db J g 4 FO Agreement Mean rating on an 11-point scale �' ' c - 0 - 2 Strongly Disagree E J 2 -4 Disagree T F1 4 - 6 Neutral ❑ 6 - 8 Agree r -- - - 8 - 10 Strongly Agree _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 538 ETC Institute (2020) Page 9 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q3.3 Agreement with: There are a variety of employment opportunities in Meridian o . db ir g i Agreement Mean rating on an 11-point scale c - 0 - 2 Strongly Disagree ` + E J 2 -4 Disagree F1 4 - 6 Neutral ❑ 6 - 8 Agree r - - 8 - 10 Strongly Agree _ �" No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 539 ETC Institute (2020) Page 10 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q3.4 Agreement with: Access to quality shopping and entertainment exist in Meridian o + db Agreement Mean rating on an 11-point scale L ' c - 0 - 2 Strongly Disagree E J 2 -4 Disagree T k IF P 40 F1 4 - 6 Neutral ❑ 17 6 - 8 Agree r -- - - 8 - 10 Strongly Agree _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 540 ETC Institute (2020) Page 10 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q3.5 Agreement with: The City is managing growth wisely r - rp- . � Y Agreement Mean rating on an 11-point scale �' ' c - 0 - 2 Strongly Disagree E J 2 -4 Disagree F1 4 - 6 Neutral 6 - 8 Agree - - 8 - 10 Strongly Agree _ 69 9 Y 9 w, � ��.. No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 541 ETC Institute (2020) Page 10 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q3.6 Agreement with: Meridian has a sense of community o . db . b 9 i Agreement Mean rating on an 11-point scale U L ' c - 0 - 2 Strongly Disagree h i T E J 2 -4 Disagree i 4 - 6 Neutral I �� ❑ 6 - 8 Agree r -' - 8 - 10 Strongly Agree _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 542 ETC Institute (2020) Page 10 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q3.7 Agreement with: The City continuously improves services o . db . b 9 i ❑ - -i Agreement Mean rating on an 11-point scale L ' c - 0 - 2 Strongly Disagree E J 2 -4 Disagree T k 40 F1 4 - 6 Neutral ❑ 6 - 8 Agree r -- - - 8 - 10 Strongly Agree No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 543 ETC Institute (2020) Page 10 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q3.8 Agreement with: The City uses your tax dollars wisely o . db b 9 i �. Agreement Mean rating on an 11-point scale c - 0 - 2 Strongly Disagree ! ` + E J 2 -4 Disagree F1 4 - 6 Neutral ❑ 6 - 8 Agree - 8 - 10 Strongly Agree No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 544 ETC Institute (2020) Page 10 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q3.9 Agreement with: The City is headed in the right direction rp- o . d ir FO Agreement ALO Mean rating on an 11-point scale U Q - 0 - 2 Strongly Disagree ! EJ 2 -4 Disagree T h ,; F1 4 - 6 Neutral 6 - 8 Agree - - 8 - 10 Strongly Agree _ 6'9 Y 9 w, � ��.. No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 545 ETC Institute (2020) Page 10 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q4.1 Perceptions: Value received for city tax dollars and fees 7 JAR Ld db b Perception L Mean rating on an 11-point scale = 0-2 Definitely Not Getting Money's Worth 2-4 Not Getting Money's Worth J 4- 6 Neutral C� 6-8 Getting Money's Worth 69 .. — 8- 10 Definitely Getting Money's Worth � No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 546 ETC Institute (2020) Page 10 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q5.1 Rating of: Fire/Rescue Services T Its 'mrp VC -r P c = : '. ' [b ¢.�.. :° -= Perception S5 Mean rating on an 11-point scale ;, + 1 0 - 2 Poor =x,� �- „. • �J' r 2 -4 Below Average 4 - 6 Neutral I _j 4 6 - 8 Good � - - 8 - 10 Excellent -4 No Response CO ETC A6 1 1 1 UTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 547 ETC Institute (2020) Page 10 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q5.2 Rating of: Fire prevention and public education Lid .47 Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale - 0 - 2 Poore F2 -4 Below Average F4 - 6 Neutral I _j ❑ 6 - 8 Good - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE �. .. "- 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 548 ETC Institute (2020) Page 10 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q5.3 Rating of: Police department/law enforcement e _ -r p [ - Igo F�II Perception S5 Mean rating on an 11-point scale ;, + 1 0 - 2 Poor =x,� �- „. • �J' r 2 -4 Below Average 5 4 - 6 Neutral I _j 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent ., No Response ETC A6 1 1 1 UTE 4' _4 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 549 ETC Institute (2020) Page 11 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q5.4 Rating of: Code enforcement A 1 rp- o . db J4 FO Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor i F2 -4 Below Average F 4 - 6 Neutral I J ❑ 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 550 ETC Institute (2020) Page 11 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q5.5 Rating of: Traffic enforcement Ld o . db b g Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor i F2 -4 Below Average 40 F 4 - 6 Neutral I J ❑ 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 551 ETC Institute (2020) Page 11 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q5.6 Rating of: Planning & zoning services LLI Irps 0 d t� Perception ss Mean rating on an 11-point scale — — 0 - 2 Poor -- . F2 -4 Below Average F u 4 - 6 Neutral r� 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE x, .. 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 552 ETC Institute (2020) Page 11 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q5.7 Rating of: Building permit services rp- 0 b q Perception A Mean rating on an 11-point scale L ' - 0 - 2 Poor F2 4 Below Average F 4 - 6 Neutral ❑ d 6 - 8 Good � �' - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 553 ETC Institute (2020) Page 11 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q5.8 Rating of: Utility billing services , LA o db . � 9 i Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' - 0 - 2 Poor T F2 -4 Below Average ,; 4 - 6 Neutral _j ❑ 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ #' No Response ETC INSTITUTE x, .. 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 554 ETC Institute (2020) Page 11 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q5.9 Rating of: Sewer services A. 'M43 t _ 1 el e [ 5 Q .11Ji' FLO a Perception x� S5 Mean rating on an 11-point scale c 1 ly 0 - 2 Poor 2 -4 Below Average L4 - 6 Neutral I J - d='�_•- _ 6 8 Good - 8 - 10 Excellent ., _ "f' No Response CO ETC A6 1 1 1 UTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 555 ETC Institute (2020) Page 11 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q5.10 Rating of: Water services { S Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' - 0 - 2 Poor M I 1 13 ` F2 -4 Below Average ;� �'_ � ► ,� F4 - 6 Neutral I _j ❑ 6 - 8 Good - 8 - 10 Excellent � .. No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 556 ETC Institute (2020) Page 11 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q5.11 Rating of: Garbage/trash pick-up services rp- ��i11r;�a• t r+3 s � r_ p ca- f MEOW Perception s Mean ratingon an 11--point scale P � n�. -* - 2 -4 Below Average 4 - 6 Neutral I _j F 6 - 8 Good - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC N5 I I I UTE .. 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 557 ETC Institute (2020) Page 11 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q5.12 Rating of: Recycling services Lij A. ;�'d b 0 Perception Ad Mean rating on an 11-point scale - O 0 - 2 Poor � Op 2 -4 Below Average F 4 - 6 Neutral _j ❑ 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 558 ETC Institute (2020) Page 11 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q5.13 Rating of: City parks e -r P c = : '. ' [b EV U. AIF. -i Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale ILI - IN, E _ 1 0 - 2 Poor 2 -4 Below Average 4 - 6 Neutral I _j 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC i W6 I I I UTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 559 ETC Institute (2020) Page 12 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q5.14 Rating of: Recreation programs ■4� r�: Op t �'45 � f Y}� { © A fflo 17 [OIL Perception -- � - Mean rating on an 11-point scale U - 0 - 2 Poor = x„ a 2 -4 Below Average F 4 - 6 Neutral _j ❑ 6 - 8 Good - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 560 ETC Institute (2020) Page 12 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q5.15 Rating of: Programs for youth 0 db 9 Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale - 0 - 2 Poor Op F2 -4 Below Average F4 - 6 Neutral _j - ' ❑ s CS 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE x, .. 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 561 ETC Institute (2020) Page 12 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q5.16 Rating of: Communications o . db b Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor i O F2 -4 Below Average F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 562 ETC Institute (2020) Page 12 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q5.17 Rating of: Passport Acceptance Agency - 4V& . .r_. e w f 0 db CU w Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale } ' y x ' 0 - 2 Poor � 13 F2 -4 Below Average , •., F 4 - 6 Neutral 6 - 8 Good - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 563 ETC Institute (2020) Page 12 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q7.1 Rating of: Public transportation services contracted with Valley Regional Transit r - 1p- d q ��--- a Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor �` 0 T 2 -4 Below Average F 4 - 6 Neutral I J ❑ 6 - 8 Good 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE x, .. 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 564 ETC Institute (2020) Page 12 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. .2 Rating of: Animal control contracted with Idaho Human Society rp o . IN d � 9 g Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — _ L ' - 0 - 2 Poor F2 -4 Below Average F4 - 6 Neutral J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ #' No Response ETC INSTITUTE x .. "- 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 565 ETC Institute (2020) Page 12 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. .3 Rating of: Programs for seniors at the Meridian Senior Center o . IN db Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor F2 -4 Below Average 30 F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 566 ETC Institute (2020) Page 12 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q7.4 Rating of: K-12 education by West Ada School District Ld o . db q Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor O F2 -4 Below Average qa L; F 4 - 6 Neutral I J ❑ d 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ ¢9 No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 567 ETC Institute (2020) Page 12 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q7.5 Rating of: Lakeview Golf Course S' 0 d * E. J JV F.. Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale ' q , - 0 - 2 Poor �' q + F2 4 Below Average F 4 - 6 Neutral ❑ 6 - 8 Good 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 568 ETC Institute (2020) Page 12 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 7.6 Rating of: Library services by the Meridian Library District IV r +{ .1J K Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale L ' 0 - 2 Poore 2 -4 Below Average L 4 - 6 Neutral - ❑ Ell ; 6 - 8 Good - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC N5 I I I UTE .. 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 569 ETC Institute (2020) Page 13 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. .7 Rating of: Swimming Pool by Western Ada Recreation District Z, S' 0 dAL * E. al Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale ' - 0 - 2 Poor + M 13 F2 4 Below Average a F 4 - 6 Neutral _j 17 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 570 ETC Institute (2020) Page 13 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q7.8 Rating of: State Highways operated by Idaho Transportation Department o + db g ` i Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor + F2 -4 Below Average F 4 - 6 Neutral I J C6 r3 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 571 ETC Institute (2020) Page 13 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q7.9 Rating of: All city roads operated by Ada County Highway District 1. rp- f o . Ob -i Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale c - 0 - 2 Poor + F2 -4 Below Average b L; F 4 - 6 Neutral I J ❑ d 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ ¢� No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 572 ETC Institute (2020) Page 13 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q7.10 Rating of: Elections by Ada County Clerk o . db i . b r r i � E Jo 11TT TTT�3�ST Perception - Mean rating on an 11-point scale L ' 0 - 2 Poore F2 -4 Below Average i �� �Ilia F4 - 6 Neutral J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ #' No Response ETC INSTITUTE x .. "- 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 573 ETC Institute (2020) Page 13 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q7.11 Rating of: Cemetery services by Meridian Cemetery Maintenance District 2)v d + E. r i ❑ AL Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale F S. 0 - 2 Poor 13 F2 -4 Below Average Y F 4 - 6 Neutral _j ❑ 6 - 8 Good - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response I ; ETC INSTITUTE x .. "- 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 574 ETC Institute (2020) Page 13 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q7.12 Rating of: Cell/mobile/data service by provider in Meridian area lep o + ;�'d b L-- Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor i 13 F2 -4 Below Average 4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 575 ETC Institute (2020) Page 13 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q7.13 Rating of: Internet service by telecommunications provider in Meridian o . db g ICU Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor O F2 -4 Below Average Ilia L; F 4 - 6 Neutral I J a 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 576 ETC Institute (2020) Page 13 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q8.1 Priority of: Roadway widening w HIM .L ir ' - �'���� Priority Level x . S5 Mean rating on an 11-point scale ILI 0 - 2 Very Low Priority 2 -4 Low Priority 5 4 - 6 Neutral I _j F 6 - 8 High Priority - 8 - 10 Very High Priority r No Response ZO ETC W6 I I I UTE x - 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 577 ETC Institute (2020) Page 13 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q8.2 Priority of: Intersection improvements Ld Priority Level Mean rating on an 11-point scale ' ' 0 -2 Very Low Priority F ] M 2 -4 Low Priority F1 4 - 6 Neutral - ❑ 6 - 8 High Priority - 8 - 10 Very High Priority No Response ETC INSTITUTE 4- I " Page 578 ETC Institute (2020) Page 13 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 8.3 Priority of: Pathways/sidewalk connections on local streets LA o . d . � 9 s Priority Level Mean rating on an 11-point scale L ' c 0 - 2 Very Low Priority + E ] 2 -4 Low Priority 4 - 6 Neutral I� _j ❑ 6 - 8 High Priority _ - 8 - 10 Very High Priority No Response 171 I ETC INSTITUTE , .. i 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 579 ETC Institute (2020) Page 14 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q8.4 Priority of: Sidewalks on arterial roadways rp- o . d . � 9 Priority Level Mean rating on an 11-point scale �' ' c 0 - 2 Very Low Priority O ti E ] 2 -4 Low Priority ,; 4 - 6 Neutral I _j 6 - 8 High Priority _ - 8 - 10 Very High Priority MENo Response 171 I ETC INSTITUTE , .. i 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 580 ETC Institute (2020) Page 14 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q8.5 Priority of: Street lights o . db --t CU Priority Level Mean rating on an 11-point scale L ' c 0 - 2 Very Low Priority i E ] 2 -4 Low Priority ,; 4 - 6 Neutral I� _j � 6 - 8 High Priority _ - 8 - 10 Very High Priority MENo Response 171 I ETC INSTITUTE , .. i 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 581 ETC Institute (2020) Page 14 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q8.6 Priority of: Shared bike and pedestrian facilities detached from roadway + . Op ■4� r�: t u S7'45 r f i ar OL Priority Level D!. '= Mean rating on an 11-point scale � c 0 -2 Very Low Priority h T e 2 -4 Low Priority 4 - 6 Neutral - a 6 - 8 High Priority - 8 - 10 Very High Priority No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 582 ETC Institute (2020) Page 14 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q8.7 Priority of: Beautification/landscaping LIJ o . db . b 9 --- Priority Level Mean rating on an 11-point scale L ' c 0 - 2 Very Low Priority E ] 2 -4 Low Priority 4 - 6 Neutral I� _j ❑ r3 6 - 8 High Priority _ - 8 - 10 Very High Priority MENo Response 171 I ETC INSTITUTE , .. i 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 583 ETC Institute (2020) Page 14 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 10.1 Priority of: Constructing Linder Road overpass over I-84 LA rp o . db S o Priority Level Mean rating on an 11-point scale c 0 -2 Very Low Priority a 2 -4 Low Priority F1 4 - 6 Neutral a 6 - 8 High Priority f - 8 - 10 Very High Priority _ #' No Response ETC INSTITUTE x, .. L 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 584 ETC Institute (2020) Page 14 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q10.2 Priority of: Widening Locust Grove Rd. from Fairview to Ustick Rd. a It I o a - Priority Level Mean rating on an 11-point scale U 0 -2 Very Low Priority 0 M F ] 2 -4 Low Priority T _ _ F 1 l 4 - 6 Neutral �-� ❑ 6 - 8 High Priority - 8 - 10 Very High Priority No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 585 ETC Institute (2020) Page 14 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 10.3 Priority of: Widening Victory Rd. from Locust Grove Rd. to Eagle Rd. Ld o . dP- b Priority Level Mean rating on an 11-point scale L ' 0 - 2 Very Low Priority = * E 2 -4 Low Priority 4 - 6 Neutral _j 6 - 8 High Priority _ - 8 - 10 Very High Priority MENo Response 171 I ETC INSTITUTE , .. i 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 586 ETC Institute (2020) Page 14 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q10.4 Priority of: Widening Ustick Rd. from Ten Mile Rd. to Linder Rd. 4 r- - -- ■4� r�: t { • I) � q i Ck Priority Level J Mean rating on an 11-point scale L ' c 0 -2 Very Low Priority O T 2 -4 Low Priority P 4 - 6 Neutral �� ❑ 6 - 8 High Priority - - 8 - 10 Very High Priority _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 587 ETC Institute (2020) Page 14 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q10.5 Priority of: Widening Linder Rd. from Cherry Ln. to Ustick Rd. -A. ■4� r�: Op t � S7'45 f. { S Priority Level Mean rating on an 11-point scale � c 0 -2 Very Low Priority T ■ 2 -4 Low Priority F1 4 - 6 Neutral ❑ a 6 - 8 High Priority f - 8 - 10 Very High Priority _ 69 No Response ETC INSTITUTE x, .. 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 588 ETC Institute (2020) Page 14 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q12.1 Rating of: Number of city parks Ld .��■ PCs ;2. AL ■a �:'� ++ r - .li.. 4 Perception -J Mean rating on an 11-point scale 0 - 2 Poor F2 -4 Below Average i -' �Ili� F 4 - 6 Neutral _j ❑ 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 589 ETC Institute (2020) Page 15 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item i 26. 2.2 Rating of: Quality, appearance and maintenance of city parks w - lll■� �t�'1 Fes:{ [ 1, -F P { .;�� -i �w Perception s Mean rating on an 11-point scale 0 - 2 Poor ' 2 -4 Below Average 4 - 6 Neutral I _j 6 - 8 Good _ - - 8 - 10 Excellent r No Response ZO ETC i W6 I I I UTE x 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 590 ETC Institute (2020) Page 15 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q12.3 Rating of: Quality of athletic fields Lid 7 77. - � Perception 55 � S5 Mean rating on an 11-point scale c - 0 - 2 Poor} M _ F2 -4 Below Average 5 �- F7. 4 - 6 Neutral I C J �-��• p �u=4-� 6 - 8 Good - 8 - 10 Excellent _ = No Response � x ETC INSTITUTE �. .. ` 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 591 ETC Institute (2020) Page 15 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q12.4 Rating of: Number of special events and festivals LA 721 o . db . � 9 Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor F2 -4 Below Average ,; F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 592 ETC Institute (2020) Page 15 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final �V,2.5 Rating of: Quality and variety of special events and festivals Ld o . d . b 9 Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor + d F2 -4 Below Average ,; F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 593 ETC Institute (2020) Page 15 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q12.6 Rating of: Number of pathways for walking and biking . _ . Ld o . db Perception _ ' Mean rating on an 11-point scale U L ' i c - 0 - 2 Poor ` 13 F2 -4 Below Average F 4 - 6 Neutral I J ❑ 6 - 8 Good - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE x, .. 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 594 ETC Institute (2020) Page 15 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q12.7 Rating of: Quality of pathways for walking and biking JL o . db . b 9 Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor i F2 -4 Below Average F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 595 ETC Institute (2020) Page 15 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26.It . .8 Rating of: Availability of information about recreation programs and classes through social media, Activity Guides, email updates, website, etc. . . _ - =- . Ld IL rp- o . db Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' Q c - 0 - 2 Poor r 0 F2 -4 Below Average F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 596 ETC Institute (2020) Page 15 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q12.9 Rating of: Availability of communication center and gym facilities a s s. 0 6�b d b "�i b 9 Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale - 0 - 2 Poor 1' q a M � F2 -4 Below Average T ,, F4 - 6 Neutral _j r3 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 597 ETC Institute (2020) Page 15 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q12.10 Rating of: Number of recreation programs and classes Ld rp- o . db . � 9 w Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor + F2 -4 Below Average F4 - 6 Neutral I J r� 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 598 ETC Institute (2020) Page 15 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q12.11 Rating of: Quality and variety of recreation programs and classes o . V, iPb d b ��--- Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor i F2 -4 Below Average P F 4 - 6 Neutral I J ❑ 6 - 8 Good - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 599 ETC Institute (2020) Page 16 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final ite,r,#26. Ratin of: Number of adults orts Q12.12 g p programs and sporting events Ld 91!�.TM rp- o . IN db � 9 i w. Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor T Md F2 -4 Below Average ,; F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 600 ETC Institute (2020) Page 16 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final ite,r,#26. Q12.13 Rating of: Quality of the adultsports programs and sporting events Ld S' 0 d Y * E. ir Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale ' q , - Op 0 - 2 Poor 1' F2 4 Below Average F 4 - 6 Neutral _ ❑ 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 601 ETC Institute (2020) Page 16 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q12.14 Rating of: Availability of youth sports programs through partners S' 0 d YAL * E. IF Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale ' q , - 0 - 2 Poor I' + 2 4 Below Average 4 - 6 Neutral _j ❑ 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 602 ETC Institute (2020) Page 16 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. .15 Rating of: Quality of youth sports programs through partners S' 0 d * E. R J b Perception ALO Mean rating on an 11-point scale ' - 0 - 2 Poor I' + F2 4 Below Average F 4 - 6 Neutral _j ❑ 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 69 No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 603 ETC Institute (2020) Page 16 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 14.1 Rating of: The "sense of community" in your neighborhood o db Sense of Community Q L Mean rating on an 11 point scale 13 _ 0-2 No Sense of Community at All 2-4 No Sense of Community _j 4-6 Neutral _ 6-8 Strong Sense of Community _ 8- 10 Very Strong Sense of Community No Response _ M M1 ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 604 ETC Institute (2020) Page 16 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q15.1 Rating of: Overall feeling of safety in the City lll■� �1• 4 r�•`,� W I b - - FPA maw .¢.,.. Perception S5 Mean rating on an 11--point scale P is 2 -4 Below Average -A � 4 - 6 Neutral I _j F 6 - 8 Good - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC i W6 I I I UTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 605 ETC Institute (2020) Page 16 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q15.2 Rating of: Quality of local police protection ■11■ �� � � -r P [ EV U. A. Is iE'OL Perception s Mean rating on an 11-point scale 1 0 - 2 Poor 2 -4 Below Average 4 - 6 Neutral I _j 6 - 8 Good � - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC A6 1 1 1 UTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 606 ETC Institute (2020) Page 16 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 15.3 Rating of: How quickly police respond to 911 emergencies FT -r P [ ; : �NOI Perception a S5 Mean rating on an 11-point scale „ c 2 -4 Below Average 5 4 - 6 Neutral I _j 6 - 8 Good � - - 8 - 10 Excellent ., No Response ETC i W6 I I I UTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 607 ETC Institute (2020) Page 16 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q15.4 Rating of: The visibility of police in neighborhoods rp- o . ;�&d b _V . b 9 Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor i F2 -4 Below Average 40 F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 608 ETC Institute (2020) Page 16 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q15.5 Rating of: Safety in city parks T Its OL Perception s Mean rating on an 11--point scale P 2 -4 Below Average 4 - 6 Neutral I _j 6 - 8 Good � - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response CO ETC A6 I I I UTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 609 ETC Institute (2020) Page 17 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q15.6 Rating of: Police safety education programs S' 0 dAL * E. Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale ' - 0 - 2 Poor = • Op F2 -4 Below Average _ F 4 - 6 Neutral _j ❑ 6 - 8 Good 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 610 ETC Institute (2020) Page 17 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q15.7 Rating of: Professionalism of employees responding to emergencies Y _ ilk � S -� P [b r �f �r 1 q + �.�.. s v�. Perception x� S5 Mean rating on an 11-point scale ILI 1 .Aj 0 - 2 Poor 2 -4 Below Average 4 - 6 Neutral I _j 6 - 8 Good _ - - 8 - 10 Excellent r No Response ETC i W6 I I I UTE x 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 611 ETC Institute (2020) Page 17 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q15.8 Rating of: Overall quality of the fire department e -r P c = : '. ' [b q ` '[OIL =. Perception Mean rating on an 11--point scale P 1 0 - 2 Poor 2 -4 Below Average 5 4 - 6 Neutral I _j 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC N5 I I I UTE x, .. 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 612 ETC Institute (2020) Page 17 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q15.9 Rating of: How quickly fire department responds to 911 emergencies i~L �4Y� * } '�y ,-• - -F ,. �R q ._ . ,��i I jj'QL _�. Perception s Mean rating on an 11-point scale ILI „ :_ �y r c 0 - 2 Poor �. 2 -4 Below Average 4 - 6 Neutral I J - d='�_•- 6 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent ., _ "f' No Response ZO ETC A6 1 1 1 UTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 613 ETC Institute (2020) Page 17 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 15.10 Rating of: Quality of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) A w J� Fdj V��]� �, VFW�L ��4Y'�* } '�y ,-• - � , -r ,. Ir �� Perception S5 Mean rating on an 11-point scale Cl 4y E. inj� c 0 - 2 Poor 2 -4 Below Average 4 - 6 Neutral I J - d='�_•- 6 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent ., _ "f' No Response ETC ,W6 I I I UTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 614 ETC Institute (2020) Page 17 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q15.11 Rating of: Fire safety education programs ■;1■ ��ii`;�:• Ea S M f5 f Ah AI Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale . 0111 Q , 0 - 2Poor p, 2 -4 Below Average 4 - 6 Neutral J � '`� • F 6 - 8 Good - 8 - 10 Excellent -, ° ' No Response ETC N5 I I I UTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 615 ETC Institute (2020) Page 17 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q15.12 Rating of: Current location of fire stations ter.. ;�14�4s �,Ti ti ri , r Perception 55 Mean rating on an 11-point scaleLl - 0 - 2 Poor} M _ F2 -4 Below Average -A 5 u 4 - 6 Neutral I J - p �=4 6 - 8 Good - 8 - 10 Excellent _ = No Response � x ETC INSTITUTE �. .. ` 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 616 ETC Institute (2020) Page 17 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q15.13 Rating of: Fire department public outreach 0 _ d Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale 0 - 2 Poor � p F2 -4 Below Average i F + u 4 - 6 Neutral a 6 - 8 Good I - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE x, .. 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 617 ETC Institute (2020) Page 17 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q16.1 Rating of: Weed abatement Ld o . db ICU g ` i Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale c - 0 - 2 Poor + O F2 -4 Below Average ,; F 4 - 6 Neutral I J ❑ d 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ ¢� No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 618 ETC Institute (2020) Page 17 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q16.2 Rating of: Removal of graffiti �k��*� �� �.. ._...F •... .lam � y � .11i �Ir � E4 2.1 * �. r _ r c b _ X - = FPA -16 Perception s Mean rating on an 11-point scale „ 1 0 - 2 Poor 2 -4 Below Average 4 - 6 Neutral I _j F 6 - 8 Good - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC N5 I I I UTE .. 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 619 ETC Institute (2020) Page 18 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q16.3 Rating of: Abandoned/junk automobile removal rp- o . db b 9 Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale U L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor i F2 -4 Below Average ,; F4 - 6 Neutral I _J ❑ 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6" No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 620 ETC Institute (2020) Page 18 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 16.4 Rating of: Clean-up of litter and debris on private property Ld rp- o . ;�&d b "V b 9 Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — �' ' c - 0 - 2 Poor i F2 -4 Below Average F 4 - 6 Neutral I J ❑ 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 621 ETC Institute (2020) Page 18 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q16.5 Rating of: Dilapidated houses or buildings rp- o . db . b 9 Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor i F2 -4 Below Average F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 622 ETC Institute (2020) Page 18 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q16.6 Rating of: Illegal dumping rp- o . dbir i b 4 F+ Ell OLM. '= Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale - 0 - 2 Poor F2 -4 Below Average ,; F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 623 ETC Institute (2020) Page 18 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#2".1 Rating of: Effectiveness of city communications with the public JL o . d . b 9 Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale ILI L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor F2 -4 Below Average F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 624 ETC Institute (2020) Page 18 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q18.2 Rating of: Opportunities for public involvement in local decision-making db bfil- A Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale — Q ' ' - 0 - 2 Poor F2 -4 Below Average F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 625 ETC Institute (2020) Page 18 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q18.3 Rating of: Quality of www.meridiancity.org . . lih _ . rp- o . d Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor i 0 F2 -4 Below Average ,; F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 626 ETC Institute (2020) Page 18 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q18.4 Rating of: The usefulness of the online services available on the City of Meridian's website _ A •i1J!1 * d r q Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — i c - 0 - 2 Poor F2 -4 Below Average F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 627 ETC Institute (2020) Page 18 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q18.5 Rating of: Quality of information about city programs and services rp- o . d� Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — �' ' c - 0 - 2 Poor O F2 -4 Below Average F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 628 ETC Institute (2020) Page 18 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q22.1 Priority of: Roads/Traffic/Transportation I Oki P { _ r {y Priority Level . S5 Mean rating on an 11-point scale Very Low Priorityi 2 -4 Low Priority 'A Q 4 - 6 Neutral I _j 6 - 8 High Priority - A� - - 8 - 10 Very High Priority r No Response ETC i W6 I I I UTE x 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 629 ETC Institute (2020) Page 19 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q22.2 Priority of: Growth/Development e f r . Priority Level ` S5 Mean rating on an 11-point scale . ' # 0 - 2 Very Low Priority _ 2 -4 Low Priority t r 4 - 6 Neutral I _j 6 - 8 High Priority � - - 8 - 10 Very High Priority No Response ETC i W6 I I I UTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 630 ETC Institute (2020) Page 19 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q22.3 Priority of: Education/Schools lll■� �1• t r fw -P, ^`rp - ; - ■. Ito 4 FOO U. ¢. L .. Priority Level S5 Mean ratingon an 11--point scale P � n�. ' # 0 - 2 Very Low Priority 2 -4 Low Priority -A 5 4 - 6 Neutral I _j 6 - 8 High Priority - ., - � 8 - 10 Very High Priority � No Response CO ETC A6 1 1 1 UTE W*.. 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 631 ETC Institute (2020) Page 19 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q22.4 Priority of: Homelessness/Social Services Ld o . db ICU Cal Priority Level Mean rating on an 11-point scale L ' c M 0 - 2 Very Low Priority 13 r E ] 2 -4 Low Priority �% - ,; 4 - 6 Neutral I _ ❑ 6 - 8 High Priority _ `f - 8 - 10 Very High Priority No Response I ETC INSTITUTE , .. M 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 632 ETC Institute (2020) Page 19 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q22.5 Priority of: Affordable Housing LA rp o . d . b log --- 4- Priority Level Mean rating on an 11-point scale �' ' c 0 - 2 Very Low Priority E ] 2 -4 Low Priority P 4 - 6 Neutral I� _j 6 - 8 High Priority _ - 8 - 10 Very High Priority MENo Response 171 I ETC INSTITUTE , .. i 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 633 ETC Institute (2020) Page 19 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q22.6 Priority of: Jobs/Economic Development Ld hr 7,21 , FF tea' d M 9 S Priority Level Mean rating on an 11-point scale Ir L ' c M 0 -2 Very Low Priority 2 -4 Low Priority F1 4 - 6 Neutral a 6 - 8 High Priority - 8 - 10 Very High Priority _ #' No Response ETC INSTITUTE x, .. L 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 634 ETC Institute (2020) Page 19 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q22.7 Priority of: Public Transportation Ld rp o . db . b 9 Priority Level Mean rating on an 11-point scale c 0 - 2 Very Low Priority + E ] 2 -4 Low Priority I've 4 - 6 Neutral I _j ❑ 6 - 8 High Priority _ `f - 8 - 10 Very High Priority No Response I ETC INSTITUTE , .. M 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 635 ETC Institute (2020) Page 19 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q22.8 Priority of: Downtown redevelopment rp o . db . � 9 Priority Level Mean rating on an 11-point scale c 0 - 2 Very Low Priority + E ] 2 -4 Low Priority PTO L; 4 - 6 Neutral I _j ❑ 6 - 8 High Priority _ `f - 8 - 10 Very High Priority No Response I ETC INSTITUTE , .. M 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 636 ETC Institute (2020) Page 19 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q22.9 Priority of: Pathway/sidewalk connections LA o . db . 9 Priority Level J Mean rating on an 11-point scale o_ _ L ' 0 -2 Very Low Priority N O ti 2 -4 Low Priority 3 f 4 - 6 Neutral F1 x, ❑ 6 - 8 High Priority - - 8 - 10 Very High Priority _ #' No Response ETC INSTITUTE x .. "- 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 637 ETC Institute (2020) Page 19 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q22.10 Priority of: City Tax burden Ld o . db ir FO Priority Level AL Mean rating on an 11-point scale Q L ' 0 - 2 Very Low Priority O E ] 2 -4 Low Priority ,; 4 - 6 Neutral I _j 6 - 8 High Priority - 8 - 10 Very High Priority _ No Response I ETC INSTITUTE , .. i 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 638 ETC Institute (2020) Page 19 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 12.11 Priority of: Telecommunications (cell phone/internet service) o . d . Jgo --- Priority Level Mean rating on an 11-point scale L ' c 0 - 2 Very Low Priority + d E ] 2 -4 Low Priority ,; 4 - 6 Neutral I� _j � r3 6 - 8 High Priority _ - 8 - 10 Very High Priority No Response I ETC INSTITUTE , .. i 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 639 ETC Institute (2020) Page 20 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q22.12 Priority of: Access to Mental Health Services o d Priority Level Mean rating on an 11-point scale L ' c 0 - 2 Very Low Priority O ti E ] 2 -4 Low Priority 4 - 6 Neutral I� _j � 6 - 8 High Priority _ - 8 - 10 Very High Priority MENo Response 171 I ETC INSTITUTE , .. i 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 640 ETC Institute (2020) Page 20 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q24a.1 Rating of: Building Inspection Services �ky5 s �r - 4= A Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale 0 - 2 Poor � T 13 F2 -4 Below Average = _s �q1 - ,; F4 - 6 Neutral J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 641 ETC Institute (2020) Page 20 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q24a.2 Rating of: Building Permit Plan Review Services R. �rt Y. Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale c - 0 - 2 Poor T R 2 -4 Below Average F4 - 6 Neutral J P;, I a 6 - 8 Good I - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 642 ETC Institute (2020) Page 20 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q24a.3 Rating of: Development Application Submittal Services Ld + / f1 d t Ia rr Fil Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale — c - 0 - 2 Poor T 2 -4 Below Average F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 643 ETC Institute (2020) Page 20 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q24a.4 Rating of: City Council Public Hearing & Testimony Services rp- o .vim i - -�j�G•a �i •�rr.F s Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale - 0 - 2 Poor T ' �2 -4 Below Average �a F 4 - 6 Neutral I J ❑ a IM 6 - 8 Good - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE x, .. I 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 644 ETC Institute (2020) Page 20 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q24a.5 Rating of: Online License Renewal Services Ld .% r •rr Fil q --- g o Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale c - 0 - 2 Poor T R � F 2 -4 Below Average 3 ,; F4 - 6 Neutral J a 6 - 8 Good I - 8 - 10 Excellent _ G" No Response ETC INSTITUTE x .. "- 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 645 ETC Institute (2020) Page 20 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q25.1 Priority of: Developing design standards for affordable housing elements o . db Priority Level Mean rating on an 11-point scale L ' c 0 - 2 Very Low Priority i E ] 2 -4 Low Priority ,; 4 - 6 Neutral I� _j ❑ r3 6 - 8 High Priority _ - 8 - 10 Very High Priority MENo Response 171 I ETC INSTITUTE , .. i 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 646 ETC Institute (2020) Page 20 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. .2 priority of: Requiring certain quantity of units in development E� pro'ects to have affordable housing elements Ld o . db rl . � 9 i g Priority Level Mean rating on an 11-point scale c 0 - 2 Very Low Priority + E ] 2 -4 Low Priority 4 - 6 Neutral I _j ❑ 6 - 8 High Priority _ `f - 8 - 10 Very High Priority No Response I ETC INSTITUTE , .. M 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 647 ETC Institute (2020) Page 20 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final ite,r,#26. 25.3 Priority of: Providing reduced development standards for pro'ects containing affordable housing elements Ld o . drl ❑ '= Priority Level Mean rating on an 11-point scale L ' c M 0 - 2 Very Low Priority O ti E ] 2 -4 Low Priority %` ,; 4 - 6 Neutral I� _j ❑ 17 6 - 8 High Priority _ - - 8 - 10 Very High Priority No Response ETC INSTITUTE , .. I 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 648 ETC Institute (2020) Page 20 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 5.4 Priority of: Participating in State discussions on property tax legislation 1 .era Priority Level = Mean rating on an 11-point scale ' ;= AIL 0 -2 Very Low Priority F ] 2 -4 Low Priority _ ,; F1 4 - 6 Neutral - ❑ 6 - 8 High Priority - 8 - 10 Very High Priority No Response ETC INSTITUTE x .. "- 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 649 ETC Institute (2020) Page 21 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. 25.5 Priority of: Increasing development densities via duplexes, apartments, townhomes, and other multi-famil designs r - o . d11 rl a i Priority Level Mean rating on an 11-point scale L ' c 0 - 2 Very Low Priority O ti E ] 2 -4 Low Priority ' ,; 4 - 6 Neutral I ❑ 17 6 - 8 High Priority _ - - 8 - 10 Very High Priority No Response ETC INSTITUTE , .. I 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 650 ETC Institute (2020) Page 21 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q26.1 Rating of: Enforcement of handheld use of cell phones & texting while driving . rp- o . d i M. '= Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale - 0 - 2 Poor F2 -4 Below Average ,; F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 651 ETC Institute (2020) Page 21 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q26.2 Rating of: Enforcement of speeding in neighborhoods Irp o . IN db b Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale c - 0 - 2 Poor + F2 -4 Below Average ,; F 4 - 6 Neutral I J ❑ d 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ ¢� No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 652 ETC Institute (2020) Page 21 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q26.3 Rating of: Enforcement of red light violations o . db . � 9 Perception J Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor F2 -4 Below Average Ilia F 4 - 6 Neutral I J a 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent _ 6' No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 653 ETC Institute (2020) Page 21 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q26.4 Rating of: Enforcement of tailgating Ld r - o b r V A Perception _ ' Mean rating on an 11-point scale L ' i c - 0 - 2 Poor ` 13 F2 -4 Below Average F 4 - 6 Neutral I J ❑ 6 - 8 Good - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE x, .. 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 654 ETC Institute (2020) Page 21 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q26.5 Rating of: Enforcement of speeding on arterial roads Irp o . IN db b 9 Perception Mean rating on an 11-point scale — L ' c - 0 - 2 Poor i F2 -4 Below Average F4 - 6 Neutral I J 6 - 8 Good - - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 655 ETC Institute (2020) Page 21 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q26.6 Rating of: Enforcement of excessive motor vehicle sound Ld d� b Fd Perception _ ' Mean rating on an 11-point scale L ' i c - 0 - 2 Poor ` 0 F2 -4 Below Average 9 "` L; F 4 - 6 Neutral I J ❑ 6 - 8 Good - 8 - 10 Excellent No Response ETC INSTITUTE x, .. 2020 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Shading reflects the mean rating for all respondents by CBG(merged as needed) Page 656 ETC Institute (2020) Page 21 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Section 5 Tabular Data Page 657 ETC Institute (2020) Page 21 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q1. The vision for Meridian is: "By 2035, Meridian will be the West's premier community in which to live, work and raise a family." Several items that may influence your perception of Meridian as a community are listed below. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the City of Meridian in the following areas. (N=704) Excell- Don't ent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor know Q1-1.As a place to live 29.0% 19.6% 28.0% 13.1% 4.0% 3.0% 1.1% 0.4% 0.6% 0.0% 0.3% 1.0% Q1-2.As a place to work 14.1% 11.6% 15.2% 11.1% 7.4% 8.1% 2.8% 1.6% 1.1% 0.1% 1.3% 25.6% Q1-3.As a place to raise a family 31.1% 21.6% 22.6% 9.7% 3.6% 2.7% 0.6% 0.3% 0.7% 0.0% 0.4% 6.8% Q1-4.As a place to start/do business 11.4% 9.8% 11.2% 11.8% 6.4% 7.1% 2.1% 0.4% 1.1% 0.1% 1.4% 37.1% Q1-5.As a City that is building a strong sense of community 15.5% 12.2% 18.9% 20.2% 10.9% 10.2% 3.0% 1.7% 1.6% 1.0% 1.7% 3.1% Q1-6.As a City that is developing a strong local economy 12.8% 12.8% 21.4% 15.5% 12.2% 8.1% 2.6% 2.3% 1.1% 0.9% 1.4% 8.9% Q1-7.As a City that is developing a strong local workforce that can compete in today's economic climate 7.7% 8.8% 15.1% 14.5% 12.9% 11.6% 4.3% 2.7% 2.0% 1.6% 2.1% 16.8% Q1-8.As a City that is planning for future growth & development 11.5% 10.2% 13.9% 12.5% 12.4% 9.9% 5.8% 4.8% 5.0% 2.6% 7.2% 4.1% Q1-9.As a City that is developing a sustainable& conscious environment 10.1% 7.8% 15.2% 13.4% 12.6% 10.4% 4.1% 4.7% 3.7% 1.8% 3.8% 12.4% Q1-10. How well City is protecting the quality of air& water 10.4% 12.4% 16.5% 13.9% 8.8% 8.0% 2.7% 3.3% 2.1% 1.0% 2.7% 18.3% Q1-11. How well City is maintaining high quality neighborhoods 13.5% 12.9% 22.6% 15.1% 9.8% 7.4% 4.3% 4.1% 1.7% 1.7% 4.0% 3.0% Q1-12. How well City is providing options for mobility other than driving 3.1% 2.7% 6.4% 8.5% 9.5% 11.5% 8.8% 11.4% 9.4% 7.1% 11.4% 10.2% Q1-13. How well City is ensuring public safety 16.2% 20.5% 21.4% 15.6% 6.1% 7.0% 2.7% 1.7% 1.6% 0.4% 1.1% 5.7% Page 658 ETC Institute (2020) Page 21 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q1. The vision for Meridian is: "By 2035, Meridian will be the West's premier community in which to live, work and raise a family." Several items that may influence your perception of Meridian as a community are listed below. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the City of Meridian in the following areas. Excell- Don't ent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor know Q1-14. How well City is communicating with the community 15.8% 16.6% 19.3% 16.9% 8.7% 9.8% 2.8% 2.4% 1.3% 1.6% 2.1% 2.7% Page 659 ETC Institute (2020) Page 22 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q1. The vision for Meridian is: "By 2035, Meridian will be the West's premier community in which to live, work and raise a family." Several items that may influence your perception of Meridian as a community are listed below. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the City of Meridian in the following areas. (without "don't know") (N=704) Excelle- nt 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor Q1-1.As a place to live 29.3% 19.8% 28.3% 13.2% 4.0% 3.0% 1.1% 0.4% 0.6% 0.0% 0.3% Q1-2.As a place to work 18.9% 15.6% 20.4% 14.9% 9.9% 10.9% 3.8% 2.1% 1.5% 0.2% 1.7% Q1-3.As a place to raise a family 33.4% 23.2% 24.2% 10.4% 3.8% 2.9% 0.6% 0.3% 0.8% 0.0% 0.5% Q1-4.As a place to start/do business 18.1% 15.6% 17.8% 18.7% 10.2% 11.3% 3.4% 0.7% 1.8% 0.2% 2.3% Q1-5.As a City that is building a strong sense of community 16.0% 12.6% 19.5% 20.8% 11.3% 10.6% 3.1% 1.8% 1.6% 1.0% 1.8% Q1-6.As a City that is developing a strong local economy 14.0% 14.0% 23.6% 17.0% 13.4% 8.9% 2.8% 2.5% 1.2% 0.9% 1.6% Q1-7.As a City that is developing a strong local workforce that can compete in today's economic climate 9.2% 10.6% 18.1% 17.4% 15.5% 14.0% 5.1% 3.2% 2.4% 1.9% 2.6% Q1-8.As a City that is planning for future growth & development 12.0% 10.7% 14.5% 13.0% 12.9% 10.4% 6.1% 5.0% 5.2% 2.7% 7.6% Q1-9.As a City that is developing a sustainable& conscious environment 11.5% 8.9% 17.3% 15.2% 14.4% 11.8% 4.7% 5.3% 4.2% 2.1% 4.4% Q1-10. How well City is protecting the quality of air& water 12.7% 15.1% 20.2% 17.0% 10.8% 9.7% 3.3% 4.0% 2.6% 1.2% 3.3% Q1-11. How well City is maintaining high quality neighborhoods 13.9% 13.3% 23.3% 15.5% 10.1% 7.6% 4.4% 4.2% 1.8% 1.8% 4.1% Q1-12. How well City is providing options for mobility other than driving 3.5% 3.0% 7.1% 9.5% 10.6% 12.8% 9.8% 12.7% 10.4% 7.9% 12.7% Page 660 ETC Institute (2020) Page 22 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q1. The vision for Meridian is: "By 2035, Meridian will be the West's premier community in which to live, work and raise a family." Several items that may influence your perception of Meridian as a community are listed below. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the City of Meridian in the following areas. (without "don't know") Excelle- nt 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor Q1-13. How well City is ensuring public safety 17.2% 21.7% 22.7% 16.6% 6.5% 7.4% 2.9% 1.8% 1.7% 0.5% 1.2% Q1-14. How well City is communicating with the community 16.2% 17.1% 19.9% 17.4% 8.9% 10.1% 2.9% 2.5% 1.3% 1.6% 2.2% Page 661 ETC Institute (2020) Page 22 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q2. While the City is not the sole contributor to your quality of life, it is important to understand the perceptions residents have of the quality of life in Meridian. Using a scale of 0 to 10,where 10 means "Greatly Exceeds My Expectations" and 0 means "Does Not Meet My Expectations at All," please rate the City and its partners in the following areas. (N=704) Greatly Does exceeds not my meet expecta- my Don't tions 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 expect... know Q2-1. Overall quality of life in City 16.3% 22.0% 26.8% 18.2% 7.4% 4.3% 1.1% 0.9% 0.6% 0.1% 0.9% 1.4% Q2-2.Overall quality of City services provided 12.4% 20.5% 26.7% 19.7% 7.7% 4.8% 2.6% 1.0% 1.0% 0.4% 0.7% 2.6% Q2-3.Overall quality of customer service you receive from City employees 17.9% 18.5% 20.0% 10.8% 3.3% 3.4% 1.3% 1.4% 0.4% 0.3% 1.3% 21.4% Q2-4.Your view of an ideal place to live 16.8% 21.4% 23.6% 15.8% 8.9% 5.7% 2.0% 1.6% 0.9% 0.7% 1.6% 1.1% Page 662 ETC Institute (2020) Page 22 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q2. While the City is not the sole contributor to your quality of life, it is important to understand the perceptions residents have of the quality of life in Meridian. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Greatly Exceeds My Expectations" and 0 means "Does Not Meet My Expectations at All," please rate the City and its partners in the following areas. (without "don't know") (N=704) Grea- Doe- tly s not exce- meet eds my my... 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 exp... Q2-1. Overall quality of life in City 16.6% 22.3% 27.2% 18.4% 7.5% 4.3% 1.2% 0.9% 0.6% 0.1% 0.9% Q2-2. Overall quality of City services provided 12.7% 21.0% 27.4% 20.3% 7.9% 5.0% 2.6% 1.0% 1.0% 0.4% 0.7% Q2-3. Overall quality of customer service you receive from City employees 22.8% 23.5% 25.5% 13.7% 4.2% 4.3% 1.6% 1.8% 0.5% 0.4% 1.6% Q2-4.Your view of an ideal place to live 17.0% 21.7% 23.9% 15.9% 9.1% 5.7% 2.0% 1.6% 0.9% 0.7% 1.6% Page 663 ETC Institute (2020) Page 22 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q3. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Strongly Agree" and 0 means "Strongly Disagree," please rate your level of agreement with the following. (N=704) Strong- Strong- ly ly disagr- Don't agree 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ee know Q3-1. Quality housing&a variety of options exist in Meridian 14.2% 12.2% 19.6% 17.6% 10.9% 9.1% 4.5% 2.7% 2.4% 1.7% 2.3% 2.7% Q3-2. Development in City enhances the quality of life 11.5% 13.6% 17.6% 17.6% 9.9% 8.8% 4.3% 4.3% 3.4% 2.1% 4.0% 2.8% Q3-3.There are a variety of employment opportunities in Meridian 5.1% 8.1% 13.6% 15.3% 10.8% 10.2% 4.4% 3.8% 2.6% 1.4% 2.3% 22.3% Q3-4.Access to quality shopping&entertainment exist in Meridian 20.9% 23.3% 20.6% 14.9% 6.0% 5.8% 3.0% 2.3% 1.0% 0.6% 0.3% 1.4% Q3-5.City is managing growth wisely 4.8% 6.0% 13.5% 14.9% 11.1% 9.4% 5.4% 8.4% 5.5% 4.1% 11.9% 5.0% Q3-6. Meridian has a sense of community 12.4% 13.8% 18.8% 16.2% 11.2% 10.8% 6.3% 2.6% 2.0% 1.4% 2.4% 2.3% Q3-7.City continuously improves services 7.8% 10.1% 17.3% 16.8% 12.4% 10.7% 4.1% 1.8% 1.7% 1.1% 1.6% 14.6% Q3-8.City uses your tax dollars wisely 5.8% 10.1% 16.6% 16.5% 10.2% 11.2% 2.7% 3.3% 1.1% 1.6% 2.6% 18.3% Q3-9.City is headed in the right direction 10.2% 11.5% 16.1% 17.2% 10.5% 11.2% 5.4% 2.4% 2.4% 1.8% 5.3% 6.0% Page 664 ETC Institute (2020) Page 22 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q3. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Strongly Agree" and 0 means "Strongly Disagree," please rate your level of agreement with the following. (without "don't know") (N=704) Strong- Strong- ly Iy agree 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 disagree Q3-1. Quality housing&a variety of options exist in Meridian 14.6% 12.6% 20.1% 18.1% 11.2% 9.3% 4.7% 2.8% 2.5% 1.8% 2.3% Q3-2. Development in City enhances the quality of life 11.8% 14.0% 18.1% 18.1% 10.2% 9.1% 4.4% 4.4% 3.5% 2.2% 4.1% Q3-3.There are a variety of employment opportunities in Meridian 6.6% 10.4% 17.6% 19.7% 13.9% 13.2% 5.7% 4.9% 3.3% 1.8% 2.9% Q3-4.Access to quality shopping&entertainment exist in Meridian 21.2% 23.6% 20.9% 15.1% 6.1% 5.9% 3.0% 2.3% 1.0% 0.6% 0.3% Q3-5.City is managing growth wisely 5.1% 6.3% 14.2% 15.7% 11.7% 9.9% 5.7% 8.8% 5.8% 4.3% 12.6% Q3-6. Meridian has a sense of community 12.6% 14.1% 19.2% 16.6% 11.5% 11.0% 6.4% 2.6% 2.0% 1.5% 2.5% Q3-7. City continuously improves services 9.2% 11.8% 20.3% 19.6% 14.5% 12.5% 4.8% 2.2% 2.0% 1.3% 1.8% Q3-8. City uses your tax dollars wisely 7.1% 12.3% 20.3% 20.2% 12.5% 13.7% 3.3% 4.0% 1.4% 1.9% 3.1% Q3-9. City is headed in the right direction 10.9% 12.2% 17.1% 18.3% 11.2% 11.9% 5.7% 2.6% 2.6% 2.0% 5.6% Page 665 ETC Institute (2020) Page 22 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q4. If you own a home in Meridian, approximately 29% of your total property tax bill goes to the City of Meridian to fund the City's operating budget for services such as police, fire and parks services. Relating to services and facilities in the City of Meridian, using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Definitely Getting My Money's Worth" and 0 means "Definitely Not Getting My Money's Worth," please rate the value you feel you are getting for City tax dollars and fees. (N=704) Def- Def- inite- inite- Don- ly ly 1t gett- not kn- ing... 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 get... ow Q4-1.Value received for City tax&fees 11.4% 16.8% 19.3% 19.3% 8.2% 6.7% 3.0% 2.1% 0.9% 0.9% 1.7% 9.8% • � • • Q4. If you own a home in Meridian, approximately 29% of your total property tax bill goes to the City of Meridian to fund the City's operating budget for services such as police, fire and parks services. Relating to services and facilities in the City of Meridian, using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Definitely Getting My Money's Worth" and 0 means "Definitely Not Getting My Money's Worth," please rate the value you feel you are getting for City tax dollars and fees. (without "don't know") (N=704) Defi- Defi- nite-- nitel- y y gett- not ing... 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 sett... Q4-1.Value received for City tax&fees 12.6% 18.6% 21.4% 21.4% 9.1% 7.4% 3.3% 2.4% 0.9% 0.9% 1.9% Page 666 ETC Institute (2020) Page 22 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q5. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the quality of the following services provided by the City of Meridian. (N=704) Excell- Don't ent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor know Q5-1. Fire/rescue services 35.8% 21.3% 13.6% 5.8% 1.7% 1.8% 0.6% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 19.0% Q5-2. Fire prevention &public education 19.6% 17.0% 13.4% 11.9% 4.5% 3.8% 2.0% 1.1% 0.6% 0.3% 0.4% 25.3% Q5-3. Police department/law enforcement 33.7% 22.2% 15.8% 7.7% 4.0% 2.3% 0.9% 1.0% 0.6% 0.4% 1.3% 10.4% Q54.Code enforcement 13.2% 13.2% 13.4% 10.9% 5.8% 5.3% 2.4% 1.6% 1.1% 0.4% 2.1% 30.5% Q5-5.Traffic enforcement 15.2% 15.6% 19.3% 11.4% 7.2% 7.1% 3.3% 1.3% 2.6% 0.4% 3.0% 13.6% Q5-6. Planning&zoning services 7.5% 6.8% 10.4% 11.9% 8.0% 7.7% 4.5% 4.5% 3.6% 3.6% 6.8% 24.7% Q5-7. Building permit services 6.8% 5.5% 8.0% 5.1% 4.7% 4.0% 1.7% 2.0% 2.1% 1.4% 3.1% 55.5% Q5-8. Utility billing services 23.6% 20.9% 21.7% 12.5% 6.1% 5.1% 1.7% 1.3% 0.7% 0.4% 0.6% 5.4% Q5-9.Sewer services 24.9% 22.2% 20.7% 11.6% 4.5% 3.7% 1.1% 0.3% 0.6% 0.0% 0.4% 9.9% Q5-10.Water services 23.3% 24.1% 19.9% 10.7% 5.5% 4.1% 1.6% 0.6% 0.9% 0.6% 1.0% 7.8% Q5-11.Garbage/trash pick-up services 28.6% 26.1% 19.9% 11.6% 4.5% 3.3% 1.8% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.6% 1.4% Q5-12. Recycling services 19.2% 17.8% 17.6% 13.8% 7.5% 7.2% 3.6% 2.3% 2.7% 1.8% 2.6% 4.0% Q5-13.City parks 36.6% 25.9% 18.8% 8.0% 2.3% 2.7% 0.7% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.6% 3.4% Q5-14. Recreation programs 15.9% 15.8% 15.3% 10.2% 5.0% 4.4% 1.1% 1.3% 0.3% 0.6% 1.6% 28.6% Q5-15. Programs for youth 12.8% 12.9% 13.6% 9.7% 4.4% 4.7% 1.6% 1.0% 0.9% 0.3% 1.4% 36.8% Q5-16.Communications 13.4% 16.9% 17.5% 14.9% 7.1% 7.7% 2.8% 1.6% 1.1% 0.6% 1.3% 15.2% Q5-17. Passport Acceptance Agency 7.0% 4.5% 4.5% 3.7% 1.8% 1.7% 0.9% 0.6% 0.4% 0.4% 1.4% 73.0% Page 667 ETC Institute (2020) Page 22 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q5. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the quality of the following services provided by the City of Meridian. (without "don't know") (N=704) Excelle- nt 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor Q5-1. Fire/rescue services 44.2% 26.3% 16.8% 7.2% 2.1% 2.3% 0.7% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Q5-2. Fire prevention & public education 26.2% 22.8% 17.9% 16.0% 6.1% 5.1% 2.7% 1.5% 0.8% 0.4% 0.6% Q5-3. Police department/law enforcement 37.6% 24.7% 17.6% 8.6% 4.4% 2.5% 1.0% 1.1% 0.6% 0.5% 1.4% Q5-4.Code enforcement 19.0% 19.0% 19.2% 15.7% 8.4% 7.6% 3.5% 2.2% 1.6% 0.6% 3.1% Q5-5.Traffic enforcement 17.6% 18.1% 22.4% 13.2% 8.4% 8.2% 3.8% 1.5% 3.0% 0.5% 3.5% Q5-6. Planning&zoning services 10.0% 9.1% 13.8% 15.8% 10.6% 10.2% 6.0% 6.0% 4.7% 4.7% 9.1% Q5-7. Building permit services 15.3% 12.5% 17.9% 11.5% 10.5% 8.9% 3.8% 4.5% 4.8% 3.2% 7.0% Q5-8. Utility billing services 24.9% 22.1% 23.0% 13.2% 6.5% 5.4% 1.8% 1.4% 0.8% 0.5% 0.6% Q5-9.Sewer services 27.6% 24.6% 23.0% 12.9% 5.0% 4.1% 1.3% 0.3% 0.6% 0.0% 0.5% Q5-10.Water services 25.3% 26.2% 21.6% 11.6% 6.0% 4.5% 1.7% 0.6% 0.9% 0.6% 1.1% Q5-11.Garbage/trash pick-up services 29.0% 26.5% 20.2% 11.8% 4.6% 3.3% 1.9% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.6% Q5-12. Recycling services 20.0% 18.5% 18.3% 14.3% 7.8% 7.5% 3.7% 2.4% 2.8% 1.9% 2.7% Q5-13.City parks 37.9% 26.8% 19.4% 8.2% 2.4% 2.8% 0.7% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.6% Q5-14. Recreation programs 22.3% 22.1% 21.5% 14.3% 7.0% 6.2% 1.6% 1.8% 0.4% 0.8% 2.2% Q5-15. Programs for youth 20.2% 20.4% 21.6% 15.3% 7.0% 7.4% 2.5% 1.6% 1.3% 0.4% 2.2% Q5-16.Communications 15.7% 19.9% 20.6% 17.6% 8.4% 9.0% 3.4% 1.8% 1.3% 0.7% 1.5% Q5-17. Passport Acceptance Agency 25.8% 16.8% 16.8% 13.7% 6.8% 6.3% 3.2% 2.1% 1.6% 1.6% 5.3% Page 668 ETC Institute (2020) Page 22 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q6. Which THREE of the City Services listed in Question 5 do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders over the next TWO years? Q6.Top choice Number Percent Fire/rescue services 37 5.3% Fire prevention &public education 13 1.8% Police department/law enforcement 1S8 22.4% Code enforcement 10 1.4% Traffic enforcement 52 7.4% Planning&zoning services 223 31.7% Building permit services 11 1.6% Utility billing services 3 0.4% Sewer services 2 0.3% Water services 19 2.7% Garbage/trash pick-up services 8 1.1% Recycling services 49 7.0% City parks 40 5.7% Recreation programs 14 2.0% Programs for youth 23 3.3% Communications 4 0.6% Passport acceptance agency 1 0.1% None chosen 37 5.3% Total 704 100.0% Q6. Which THREE of the City Services listed in Question 5 do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders over the next TWO years? Q6. 2nd choice Number Percent Fire/rescue services 66 9.4% Fire prevention &public education 17 2.4% Police department/law enforcement 111 15.8% Code enforcement 31 4.4% Traffic enforcement 69 9.8% Planning&zoning services 107 15.2% Building permit services 36 5.1% Utility billing services 5 0.7% Sewer services 7 1.0% Water services 12 1.7% Garbage/trash pick-up services 5 0.7% Recycling services 44 6.3% City parks 62 8.8% Recreation programs 32 4.5% Programs for youth 36 5.1% Communications 11 1.6% Passport acceptance agency 3 0.4% None chosen 50 7.1% Total 704 100.0% Page 669 ETC Institute (2020) Page 23 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q6. Which THREE of the City Services listed in Question 5 do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders over the next TWO years? Q6. 3rd choice Number Percent Fire/rescue services 44 6.3% Fire prevention &public education 22 3.1% Police department/law enforcement 78 11.1% Code enforcement 34 4.8% Traffic enforcement 48 6.8% Planning&zoning services 55 7.8% Building permit services 26 3.7% Utility billing services 11 1.6% Sewer services 7 1.0% Water services 14 2.0% Garbage/trash pick-up services 16 2.3% Recycling services 49 7.0% City parks 77 10.9% Recreation programs 36 5.1% Programs for youth 65 9.2% Communications 34 4.8% Passport acceptance agency 5 0.7% None chosen 83 11.8% Total 704 100.0% Q6. Which THREE of the City Services listed in Question 5 do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders over the next TWO years? (top 3) Q6.Sum of top 3 choices Number Percent Fire/rescue services 147 20.9% Fire prevention &public education 52 7.4% Police department/law enforcement 347 49.3% Code enforcement 75 10.7% Traffic enforcement 169 24.0% Planning&zoning services 385 54.7% Building permit services 73 10.4% Utility billing services 19 2.7% Sewer services 16 2.3% Water services 45 6.4% Garbage/trash pick-up services 29 4.1% Recycling services 142 20.2% City parks 179 25.4% Recreation programs 82 11.6% Programs for youth 124 17.6% Communications 49 7.0% Passport acceptance agency 9 1.3% None chosen 37 5.3% Total 1979 Page 670 ETC Institute (2020) Page 23 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q7. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following services provided by other agency partners. (N=704) Excell- Don't ent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor know Q7-1. Public transportation services contracted with Valley Regional Transit 1.4% 1.4% 3.1% 4.3% 5.0% 6.1% 5.4% 3.8% 4.0% 4.0% 7.2% 54.3% Q7-2.Animal control contracted with Idaho Humane Society 7.8% 7.2% 10.2% 8.9% 5.4% 6.5% 2.6% 2.0% 1.7% 0.7% 3.0% 43.9% Q7-3. Programs for seniors at Meridian Senior Center 5.0% 3.3% 7.2% 5.7% 2.3% 3.8% 0.9% 0.4% 0.9% 0.6% 0.7% 69.3% Q7-4. K-12 education by West Ada School District 7.2% 8.0% 14.1% 14.8% 8.9% 8.2% 4.5% 4.8% 2.8% 1.8% 2.7% 22.0% Q7-5. Lakeview Golf Course 4.4% 4.7% 7.7% 4.4% 3.0% 4.7% 0.7% 1.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.9% 68.0% Q7-6. Library services by Meridian Library District 23.6% 18.6% 15.3% 11.2% 5.0% 4.1% 0.9% 0.3% 0.6% 0.1% 1.0% 19.3% Q7-7.Swimming pool by Western Ada Recreation District 8.0% 6.0% 11.2% 6.5% 3.4% 4.3% 1.8% 0.7% 0.6% 0.3% 1.6% 55.7% Q7-8.State highways operated by Idaho Transportation Department (Eagle Road, Meridian Road,& Chinden Boulevard) 7.5% 6.5% 13.4% 17.6% 13.1% 11.2% 7.4% 5.5% 4.0% 2.8% 7.0% 4.0% Q7-9.All City roads operated by Ada County Highway District 6.0% 7.1% 15.3% 16.1% 14.8% 10.8% 7.1% 7.4% 3.1% 3.3% 5.0% 4.1% Q7-10. Elections by Ada County clerk 16.2% 15.2% 18.9% 10.7% 6.1% 7.7% 1.6% 0.9% 1.4% 0.3% 1.7% 19.5% Q7-11. Cemetery services by Meridian Cemetery Maintenance District 6.5% 5.8% 5.4% 3.6% 1.0% 1.8% 0.6% 0.3% 0.4% 0.1% 0.6% 73.9% Q7-12. Cell/mobile/data service by provider in Meridian area 16.1% 13.8% 18.9% 17.2% 8.7% 6.1% 2.8% 3.1% 3.3% 1.6% 2.7% 5.8% Q7-13. Internet service by telecommunications provider in Meridian 12.2% 13.2% 16.6% 14.5% 10.9% 7.4% 3.6% 4.3% 4.5% 2.1% 4.4% 6.3% Page 671 ETC Institute (2020) Page 23 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q7. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following services provided by other agency partners. (without "don't know") (N=704) Excelle- nt 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor Q7-1. Public transportation services contracted with Valley Regional Transit 3.1% 3.1% 6.8% 9.3% 10.9% 13.4% 11.8% 8.4% 8.7% 8.7% 15.8% Q7-2.Animal control contracted with Idaho Humane Society 13.9% 12.9% 18.2% 15.9% 9.6% 11.6% 4.6% 3.5% 3.0% 1.3% 5.3% Q7-3. Programs for seniors at Meridian Senior Center 16.2% 10.6% 23.6% 18.5% 7.4% 12.5% 2.8% 1.4% 2.8% 1.9% 2.3% Q7-4. K-12 education by West Ada School District 9.3% 10.2% 18.0% 18.9% 11.5% 10.6% 5.8% 6.2% 3.6% 2.4% 3.5% Q7-5. Lakeview Golf Course 13.8% 14.7% 24.0% 13.8% 9.3% 14.7% 2.2% 3.1% 1.8% 0.0% 2.7% Q7-6. Library services by Meridian Library District 29.2% 23.1% 19.0% 13.9% 6.2% 5.1% 1.1% 0.4% 0.7% 0.2% 1.2% Q7-7.Swimming pool by Western Ada Recreation District 17.9% 13.5% 25.3% 14.7% 7.7% 9.6% 4.2% 1.6% 1.3% 0.6% 3.5% Q7-8.State highways operated by Idaho Transportation Department (Eagle Road, Meridian Road,& Chinden Boulevard) 7.8% 6.8% 13.9% 18.3% 13.6% 11.7% 7.7% 5.8% 4.1% 3.0% 7.2% Q7-9.All City roads operated by Ada County Highway District 6.2% 7.4% 16.0% 16.7% 15.4% 11.3% 7.4% 7.7% 3.3% 3.4% 5.2% Q7-10. Elections by Ada County clerk 20.1% 18.9% 23.5% 13.2% 7.6% 9.5% 1.9% 1.1% 1.8% 0.4% 2.1% Q7-11.Cemetery services by Meridian Cemetery Maintenance District 25.0% 22.3% 20.7% 13.6% 3.8% 7.1% 2.2% 1.1% 1.6% 0.5% 2.2% Q7-12.Cell/mobile/data service by provider in Meridian area 17.0% 14.6% 20.1% 18.3% 9.2% 6.5% 3.0% 3.3% 3.5% 1.7% 2.9% Q7-13. Internet service by telecommunications provider in Meridian 13.0% 14.1% 17.7% 15.5% 11.7% 7.9% 3.8% 4.5% 4.8% 2.3% 4.7% Page 672 ETC Institute (2020) Page 23 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q8. There are a variety of transportation infrastructure improvements needed along roads in Meridian. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "High Priority" and 0 means "No Priority," please rate the following road-related aspects of our community you would like to see. (N=704) High No Don't priority 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 priority know Q8-1. Roadway widening (from single to multiple lanes) 48.4% 13.6% 15.2% 8.7% 4.1% 3.6% 0.9% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 0.9% 2.3% Q8-2. Intersection improvements 32.0% 15.2% 17.2% 12.1% 8.4% 6.5% 2.1% 1.1% 0.6% 0.7% 1.0% 3.1% Q8-3. Pathways/sidewalk connections on local streets 27.8% 14.2% 18.2% 12.2% 10.5% 7.0% 2.1% 2.0% 0.9% 0.6% 1.3% 3.3% Q8-4.Sidewalks on arterial (major) roadways 23.6% 14.6% 18.0% 11.6% 8.9% 9.9% 3.0% 2.3% 1.0% 1.8% 1.6% 3.6% Q8-5.Street lights 18.2% 13.4% 18.9% 16.3% 8.0% 9.1% 4.3% 3.8% 1.0% 0.9% 2.4% 3.8% Q8-6.Shared bike&pedestrian facilities(similar to Boise Greenbelt)detached from roadway 34.4% 13.2% 13.9% 10.8% 5.7% 7.1% 2.3% 2.1% 2.4% 1.7% 3.3% 3.1% Q8-7. Beautification/ landscaping 14.9% 12.4% 16.6% 14.3% 11.1% 11.4% 5.1% 3.6% 2.0% 3.0% 3.3% 2.4% Page 673 ETC Institute (2020) Page 23 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q8. There are a variety of transportation infrastructure improvements needed along roads in Meridian. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "High Priority" and 0 means "No Priority," please rate the following road-related aspects of our community you would like to see. (without "don't know") (N=704) High No priority 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 priority Q8-1. Roadway widening (from single to multiple lanes) 49.6% 14.0% 15.6% 8.9% 4.2% 3.6% 0.9% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 0.9% Q8-2. Intersection improvements 33.0% 15.7% 17.7% 12.5% 8.7% 6.7% 2.2% 1.2% 0.6% 0.7% 1.0% Q8-3. Pathways/sidewalk connections on local streets 28.8% 14.7% 18.8% 12.6% 10.9% 7.2% 2.2% 2.1% 0.9% 0.6% 1.3% Q8-4.Sidewalks on arterial (major) roadways 24.4% 15.2% 18.7% 12.1% 9.3% 10.3% 3.1% 2.4% 1.0% 1.9% 1.6% Q8-5.Street lights 18.9% 13.9% 19.6% 17.0% 8.3% 9.5% 4.4% 4.0% 1.0% 0.9% 2.5% Q8-6.Shared bike& pedestrian facilities(similar to Boise Greenbelt)detached from roadway 35.5% 13.6% 14.4% 11.1% 5.9% 7.3% 2.3% 2.2% 2.5% 1.8% 3.4% Q8-7. Beautification/ landscaping 15.3% 12.7% 17.0% 14.7% 11.4% 11.6% 5.2% 3.6% 2.0% 3.1% 3.3% Page 674 ETC Institute (2020) Page 23 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q9. Which THREE of the transportation improvements listed in Question 8 do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders in working with partner agencies over the next THREE years? Q9.Top choice Number Percent Roadway widening(from single to multiple lanes) 430 61.1% Intersection improvements 48 6.8% Pathways/sidewalk connections on local streets 39 5.5% Sidewalks on arterial (major) roadways 23 3.3% Street lights 22 3.1% Shared bike&pedestrian facilities(similar to Boise Greenbelt) detached from roadway 92 13.1% Beautification/landscaping 15 2.1% None chosen 35 5.0% Total 704 100.0% Q9. Which THREE of the transportation improvements listed in Question 8 do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders in working with partner agencies over the next THREE years? Q9. 2nd choice Number Percent Roadway widening(from single to multiple lanes) 73 10.4% Intersection improvements 237 33.7% Pathways/sidewalk connections on local streets 94 13.4% Sidewalks on arterial (major) roadways 64 9.1% Street lights 45 6.4% Shared bike&pedestrian facilities(similar to Boise Greenbelt) detached from roadway 114 16.2% Beautification/landscaping 30 4.3% None chosen 47 6.7% Total 704 100.0% Page 675 ETC Institute (2020) Page 23 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q9. Which THREE of the transportation improvements listed in Question 8 do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders in working with partner agencies over the next THREE years? Q9. 3rd choice Number Percent Roadway widening(from single to multiple lanes) 59 8.4% Intersection improvements 79 11.2% Pathways/sidewalk connections on local streets 139 19.7% Sidewalks on arterial (major) roadways 86 12.2% Street lights 85 12.1% Shared bike&pedestrian facilities(similar to Boise Greenbelt) detached from roadway 113 16.1% Beautification/landscaping 75 10.7% None chosen 68 9.7% Total 704 100.0% Q9. Which THREE of the transportation improvements listed in Question 8 do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders in working with partner agencies over the next THREE years? (top 3) Q9.Sum of top 3 choices Number Percent Roadway widening(from single to multiple lanes) 562 79.8% Intersection improvements 364 51.7% Pathways/sidewalk connections on local streets 272 38.6% Sidewalks on arterial (major) roadways 173 24.6% Street lights 152 21.6% Shared bike&pedestrian facilities(similar to Boise Greenbelt) detached from roadway 319 45.3% Beautification/landscaping 120 17.0% None chosen 35 5.0% Total 1997 Page 676 ETC Institute (2020) Page 23 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q10. Meridian prioritizes roadway and intersection projects that the Ada County Highway District does not currently have in their budget. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "High Priority" and 0 means "No Priority," please rate your priority of the following future roadway construction projects in our community. (N=704) High No Don't priority 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 priority know Q10-1.Construct Linder Road overpass over 1-84 30.0% 10.9% 11.4% 11.4% 5.7% 8.9% 1.7% 2.3% 2.0% 2.3% 6.3% 7.2% Q10-2.Widen Locust Grove Road from Fairview to Ustick Road 25.3% 12.1% 18.6% 12.6% 6.8% 8.5% 2.6% 2.3% 1.4% 1.3% 2.7% 5.8% Q10-3.Widen Victory Road from Locust Grove Road to Eagle Road 13.2% 8.2% 12.2% 13.8% 8.8% 13.5% 4.3% 4.1% 2.7% 1.8% 4.5% 12.8% Q10-4.Widen Ustick Road from Ten Mile Road to Linder Road 25.7% 12.2% 13.6% 13.8% 8.0% 8.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.0% 1.6% 3.1% 6.8% Q10-5.Widen Linder Road from Cherry Lane to Ustick Road 26.3% 12.9% 13.2% 13.1% 8.0% 7.8% 2.8% 2.0% 1.7% 1.4% 4.1% 6.7% Page 677 ETC Institute (2020) Page 23 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q10. Meridian prioritizes roadway and intersection projects that the Ada County Highway District does not currently have in their budget. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "High Priority" and 0 means "No Priority," please rate your priority of the following future roadway construction projects in our community. (without "don't know") (N=704) High No priority 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 priority Q10-1.Construct Linder Road overpass over 1-84 32.3% 11.8% 12.3% 12.3% 6.1% 9.6% 1.8% 2.5% 2.1% 2.5% 6.7% Q10-2.Widen Locust Grove Road from Fairview to Ustick Road 26.8% 12.8% 19.8% 13.4% 7.2% 9.0% 2.7% 2.4% 1.5% 1.4% 2.9% Q10-3.Widen Victory Road from Locust Grove Road to Eagle Road 15.1% 9.4% 14.0% 15.8% 10.1% 15.5% 4.9% 4.7% 3.1% 2.1% 5.2% Q10-4.Widen Ustick Road from Ten Mile Road to Linder Road 27.6% 13.1% 14.6% 14.8% 8.5% 9.0% 2.6% 2.6% 2.1% 1.7% 3.4% Q10-5.Widen Linder Road from Cherry Lane to Ustick Road 28.2% 13.9% 14.2% 14.0% 8.5% 8.4% 3.0% 2.1% 1.8% 1.5% 4.4% Page 678 ETC Institute (2020) Page 23 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q11. If a bond measure were placed on the ballot requesting funding for road improvement needs, in general would you support a bond to pay for the identified roadway and intersection projects above in Question 10? Q11.Would you support a bond to pay for the identified roadway&intersection projects Number Percent Yes 351 49.9% No 147 20.9% Don't know 206 29.3% Total 704 100.0% Q11. If a bond measure were placed on the ballot requesting funding for road improvement needs, in general would you support a bond to pay for the identified roadway and intersection projects above in Question 10? (without "don't know") Q11.Would you support a bond to pay for the identified roadway&intersection projects Number Percent Yes 351 70.5% No 147 29.5% Total 498 100.0% Page 679 ETC Institute (2020) Page 24 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q12. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following parks and recreation services. (N=704) Excell- Don't ent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor know Q12-1. Number of City parks 32.1% 17.6% 19.5% 14.8% 3.8% 3.1% 2.0% 0.7% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4% 5.7% Q12-2.Quality,appearance& maintenance of City parks 36.4% 23.7% 21.7% 7.2% 2.6% 3.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 4.4% Q12-3. Quality of athletic fields 24.0% 16.1% 18.8% 8.2% 3.1% 1.3% 0.6% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.4% 27.3% Q12-4. Number of special events&festivals 13.4% 9.9% 15.5% 13.5% 8.4% 8.0% 4.4% 3.3% 2.4% 0.6% 1.1% 19.6% Q12-5.Quality&variety of special events&festivals 12.8% 10.1% 15.2% 13.5% 9.1% 7.4% 3.4% 3.1% 2.3% 0.9% 1.0% 21.3% Q12-6. Number of pathways for walking&biking 7.7% 8.0% 14.9% 17.0% 11.6% 11.4% 5.3% 5.5% 3.0% 2.1% 3.6% 9.9% Q12-7.Quality of pathways for walking&biking 11.5% 11.1% 18.2% 17.2% 8.1% 9.7% 3.7% 4.8% 1.3% 0.7% 2.1% 11.6% Q12-8.Availability of information about recreation programs&classes through social media,activity guides, email updates,website,etc. 10.8% 11.6% 15.3% 10.7% 8.5% 10.4% 5.0% 3.7% 2.8% 1.1% 2.6% 17.5% Q12-9.Availability of community center&gym facilities 7.1% 4.8% 10.8% 9.2% 8.4% 9.7% 4.7% 3.7% 3.4% 2.4% 3.0% 32.8% Q12-10. Number of recreation programs&classes 7.7% 6.8% 11.8% 9.4% 8.0% 8.2% 2.7% 4.5% 1.7% 1.4% 1.1% 36.6% Q12-11.Quality&variety of recreation programs&classes 8.1% 6.3% 10.2% 10.2% 6.0% 7.7% 3.0% 2.8% 1.4% 1.0% 1.3% 42.0% Q12-12. Number of adult sports programs&sporting events 6.0% 5.4% 8.4% 7.1% 4.5% 6.5% 2.3% 4.0% 1.3% 0.9% 1.7% 52.0% Q12-13. Quality of adult sports programs&sporting events 5.5% 4.7% 7.1% 6.5% 3.6% 5.8% 2.1% 2.4% 1.3% 1.0% 1.6% 58.4% Page 680 ETC Institute (2020) Page 24 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q12. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following parks and recreation services. Excell- Don't ent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor know Q12-14.Availability of youth sports programs through partners,such as Police Activities League(PAL), Meridian Youth Baseball (MYB), &others 11.1% 10.9% 12.5% 7.7% 4.3% 4.5% 2.1% 0.9% 0.7% 1.1% 1.0% 43.2% Q12-15. Quality of youth sports programs through partners,such as Police Activities League(PAL), Meridian Youth Baseball (MYB),others 10.7% 10.5% 12.4% 7.7% 4.4% 3.3% 1.7% 0.6% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 46.3% Page 681 ETC Institute (2020) Page 24 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q12. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following parks and recreation services. (without "don't know") (N=704) Excelle- nt 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor Q12-1. Number of City parks 34.0% 18.7% 20.6% 15.7% 4.1% 3.3% 2.1% 0.8% 0.2% 0.2% 0.5% Q12-2.Quality, appearance& maintenance of City parks 38.0% 24.8% 22.7% 7.6% 2.7% 3.1% 0.0% 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% Q12-3.Quality of athletic fields 33.0% 22.1% 25.8% 11.3% 4.3% 1.8% 0.8% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.6% Q12-4. Number of special events&festivals 16.6% 12.4% 19.3% 16.8% 10.4% 9.9% 5.5% 4.1% 3.0% 0.7% 1.4% Q12-5.Quality&variety of special events&festivals 16.2% 12.8% 19.3% 17.1% 11.6% 9.4% 4.3% 4.0% 2.9% 1.1% 1.3% Q12-6. Number of pathways for walking&biking 8.5% 8.8% 16.6% 18.9% 12.9% 12.6% 5.8% 6.2% 3.3% 2.4% 3.9% Q12-7. Quality of pathways for walking&biking 13.0% 12.5% 20.6% 19.5% 9.2% 10.9% 4.2% 5.5% 1.4% 0.8% 2.4% Q12-8.Availability of information about recreation programs&classes through social media,activity guides, email updates,website,etc. 13.1% 14.1% 18.6% 12.9% 10.3% 12.6% 6.0% 4.5% 3.4% 1.4% 3.1% Q12-9.Availability of community center&gym facilities 10.6% 7.2% 16.1% 13.7% 12.5% 14.4% 7.0% 5.5% 5.1% 3.6% 4.4% Q12-10. Number of recreation programs&classes 12.1% 10.8% 18.6% 14.8% 12.6% 13.0% 4.3% 7.2% 2.7% 2.2% 1.8% Q12-11.Quality&variety of recreation programs&classes 14.0% 10.8% 17.6% 17.6% 10.3% 13.2% 5.1% 4.9% 2.5% 1.7% 2.2% Q12-12. Number of adult sports programs&sporting events 12.4% 11.2% 17.5% 14.8% 9.5% 13.6% 4.7% 8.3% 2.7% 1.8% 3.6% Q12-13.Quality of adult sports programs&sporting events 13.3% 11.3% 17.1% 15.7% 8.5% 14.0% 5.1% 5.8% 3.1% 2.4% 3.8% Page 682 ETC Institute (2020) Page 24 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q12. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following parks and recreation services. (without "don't know") Excelle- nt 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor Q12-14.Availability of youth sports programs through partners,such as Police Activities League(PAL), Meridian Youth Baseball (MYB), &others 19.5% 19.3% 22.0% 13.5% 7.5% 8.0% 3.8% 1.5% 1.3% 2.0% 1.8% Q12-15.Quality of youth sports programs through partners,such as Police Activities League(PAL), Meridian Youth Baseball (MYB), others 19.8% 19.6% 23.0% 14.3% 8.2% 6.1% 3.2% 1.1% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% Page 683 ETC Institute (2020) Page 24 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q13. In the past 12 months, have you or anyone in your household visited a City of Meridian park? Q13. Have you visited a City park in past 12 months Number Percent Yes, I have personally visited a City park in last year 622 88.4% Yes, a household member has visited a City park in last year 20 2.8% No 50 7.1% Not provided 12 1.7% Total 704 100.0% Q13. In the past 12 months, have you or anyone in your household visited a City of Meridian park? (without "not provided") Q13. Have you visited a City park in past 12 months Number Percent Yes, I have personally visited a City park in last year 622 89.9% Yes, a household member has visited a City park in last year 20 2.9% No 50 7.2% Total 692 100.0% Page 684 ETC Institute (2020) Page 24 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q14. Some neighborhoods have a great "sense of community." People know their neighbors from Neighborhood Watch Programs or have block parties and truly think of the others in the same area as "neighbors." Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means a "Very Strong Sense of Community" and 0 means "No Sense of Community at All," please rate the sense of community in your neighborhood. (N=704) Very strong No sense of sense of commun- commun- Don't ity 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ity at all know Q14-1. Rating of "sense of community" in your neighborho- od 12.2% 11.1% 17.8% 16.8% 11.9% 8.8% 5.8% 3.3% 4.0% 1.8% 4.0% 2.6% • � • • Q14. Some neighborhoods have a great "sense of community." People know their neighbors from Neighborhood Watch Programs or have block parties and truly think of the others in the same area as "neighbors." Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means a "Very Strong Sense of Community" and 0 means "No Sense of Community at All," please rate the sense of community in your neighborhood. (without "don't know" (N=704) Very strong No sense of sense of commun- commun- ity 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ity at all Q14-1. Rating of "sense of community" in your neighborhood 12.5% 11.4% 18.2% 17.2% 12.2% 9.0% 6.0% 3.4% 4.1% 1.9% 4.1% Page 685 ETC Institute (2020) Page 24 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q15. Public safety has prioritized public outreach using social media, public presentations, citizen academies, and volunteer opportunities like citizen park patrols. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following public safety services. (N=704) Excell- Don't ent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor know Q15-1.Overall feeling of safety in City 27.8% 28.6% 24.0% 10.1% 3.1% 1.7% 1.4% 0.6% 0.1% 0.3% 0.6% 1.7% Q15-2. Quality of local police protection 34.5% 24.9% 19.6% 6.0% 2.4% 2.0% 0.6% 0.7% 0.3% 0.4% 1.7% 7.0% Q15-3. How quickly police respond to 911 emergencies 20.3% 14.1% 9.2% 2.6% 0.6% 0.4% 0.4% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 1.1% 50.7% Q15-4.Visibility of police in neighborhoods 17.0% 14.5% 18.0% 13.9% 8.8% 9.2% 3.0% 3.8% 1.8% 1.6% 3.1% 5.1% Q15-5.Safety in City parks 25.6% 25.3% 18.2% 9.9% 3.1% 4.0% 0.7% 0.7% 0.1% 0.0% 1.0% 11.4% Q15-6. Police safety education programs 10.7% 6.8% 8.5% 6.1% 2.1% 3.8% 1.6% 1.3% 0.7% 0.3% 1.4% 56.7% Q15-7. Professionalism of employees responding to emergencies 25.3% 16.1% 11.2% 3.8% 1.1% 0.9% 0.7% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 1.0% 38.6% Q15-8.Overall quality of fire department 34.1% 23.0% 10.4% 3.1% 1.4% 0.9% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 26.7% Q15-9. How quickly fire department responds to 911 emergencies 26.1% 17.6% 6.4% 2.1% 0.7% 0.6% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 46.0% Q15-10.Quality of Emergency Medical Services(EMS) 28.7% 16.9% 7.1% 3.1% 0.1% 1.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 42.3% Q15-11. Fire safety education programs 13.8% 9.5% 8.0% 6.8% 1.4% 2.4% 0.9% 0.4% 0.3% 0.1% 1.1% 55.3% Q15-12.Current location of fire stations 29.7% 22.7% 18.9% 8.0% 3.7% 3.0% 0.1% 0.4% 0.1% 0.3% 0.3% 12.8% Q15-13. Fire department public outreach 13.9% 10.8% 10.7% 5.7% 3.7% 3.3% 0.9% 0.7% 1.3% 0.4% 1.0% 47.7% Page 686 ETC Institute (2020) Page 24 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q15. Public safety has prioritized public outreach using social media, public presentations, citizen academies, and volunteer opportunities like citizen park patrols. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following public safety services. (without "don't know") (N=704) Excelle- nt 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor Q15-1.Overall feeling of safety in City 28.3% 29.0% 24.4% 10.3% 3.2% 1.7% 1.4% 0.6% 0.1% 0.3% 0.6% Q15-2.Quality of local police protection 37.1% 26.7% 21.1% 6.4% 2.6% 2.1% 0.6% 0.8% 0.3% 0.5% 1.8% Q15-3. How quickly police respond to 911 emergencies 41.2% 28.5% 18.7% 5.2% 1.2% 0.9% 0.9% 0.3% 0.6% 0.3% 2.3% Q15-4.Visibility of police in neighborhoods 18.0% 15.3% 19.0% 14.7% 9.3% 9.7% 3.1% 4.0% 1.9% 1.6% 3.3% Q15-5.Safety in City parks 28.8% 28.5% 20.5% 11.2% 3.5% 4.5% 0.8% 0.8% 0.2% 0.0% 1.1% Q15-6. Police safety education programs 24.6% 15.7% 19.7% 14.1% 4.9% 8.9% 3.6% 3.0% 1.6% 0.7% 3.3% Q15-7. Professionalism of employees responding to emergencies 41.2% 26.2% 18.3% 6.3% 1.9% 1.4% 1.2% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 1.6% Q15-8.Overall quality of fire department 46.5% 31.4% 14.1% 4.3% 1.9% 1.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% Q15-9. How quickly fire department responds to 911 emergencies 48.4% 32.6% 11.8% 3.9% 1.3% 1.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% Q15-10.Quality of Emergency Medical Services(EMS) 49.8% 29.3% 12.3% 5.4% 0.2% 1.7% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% Q15-11. Fire safety education programs 30.8% 21.3% 17.8% 15.2% 3.2% 5.4% 1.9% 1.0% 0.6% 0.3% 2.5% Q15-12. Current location of fire stations 34.0% 26.1% 21.7% 9.1% 4.2% 3.4% 0.2% 0.5% 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% Q15-13. Fire department public outreach 26.6% 20.7% 20.4% 10.9% 7.1% 6.3% 1.6% 1.4% 2.4% 0.8% 1.9% Page 687 ETC Institute (2020) Page 24 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q16. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the City's efforts in the enforcement of the following codes and ordinances. (N=704) Excell- Don't ent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor know Q16-1.Weed abatement 6.5% 7.5% 13.5% 11.2% 8.7% 6.0% 4.4% 4.8% 2.3% 1.6% 3.8% 29.7% Q16-2. Removal of graffiti 18.5% 15.2% 14.6% 8.8% 3.1% 2.1% 0.9% 0.7% 0.1% 0.4% 0.9% 34.7% Q16-3.Abandoned/junk automobile removal 13.2% 11.9% 13.4% 9.1% 5.0% 4.3% 1.6% 1.4% 0.9% 1.6% 2.4% 35.4% Q16-4. Clean-up of litter& debris on private property 9.2% 8.0% 12.2% 9.1% 6.1% 5.7% 3.1% 2.4% 1.6% 1.8% 3.3% 37.5% Q16-5. Dilapidated houses or buildings 7.7% 9.1% 13.9% 10.4% 6.3% 5.8% 4.3% 1.7% 0.4% 1.4% 2.6% 36.5% Q16-6. Illegal dumping 10.1% 9.8% 8.9% 5.7% 4.3% 4.0% 1.8% 1.7% 0.4% 0.6% 1.7% 51.0% Q16. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the City's efforts in the enforcement of the following codes and ordinances. (without "don't know") (N=704) Excelle- nt 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor Q16-1.Weed abatement 9.3% 10.7% 19.2% 16.0% 12.3% 8.5% 6.3% 6.9% 3.2% 2.2% 5.5% Q16-2. Removal of graffiti 28.3% 23.3% 22.4% 13.5% 4.8% 3.3% 1.3% 1.1% 0.2% 0.7% 1.3% Q16-3.Abandoned/junk automobile removal 20.4% 18.5% 20.7% 14.1% 7.7% 6.6% 2.4% 2.2% 1.3% 2.4% 3.7% Q16-4.Clean-up of litter& debris on private property 14.8% 12.7% 19.5% 14.5% 9.8% 9.1% 5.0% 3.9% 2.5% 3.0% 5.2% Q16-5. Dilapidated houses or buildings 12.1% 14.3% 21.9% 16.3% 9.8% 9.2% 6.7% 2.7% 0.7% 2.2% 4.0% Q16-6. Illegal dumping 20.6% 20.0% 18.3% 11.6% 8.7% 8.1% 3.8% 3.5% 0.9% 1.2% 3.5% Page 688 ETC Institute (2020) Page 24 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q17. Do you have a working smoke detector in your home? Q17. Do you have a working smoke detector in your home Number Percent Yes 682 96.9% No 5 0.7% Don't know 17 2.4% Total 704 100.0% Q17. Do you have a working smoke detector in your home? (without "don't know") Q17. Do you have a working smoke detector in your home Number Percent Yes 682 99.3% No 5 0.7% Total 687 100.0% Page 689 ETC Institute (2020) Page 25 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q18.The City uses a variety of methods to communicate with the public, including its website, social media such as Nextdoor, Facebook and Twitter, traditional media such as newspapers, radio, and television, and a bi-weekly newsletter. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following communication services. (N=704) Excell- Don't ent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor know Q18-1. Effectiveness of City communications with the public 16.5% 14.3% 20.3% 14.2% 8.4% 8.4% 3.1% 2.3% 0.9% 0.0% 1.7% 9.9% Q18-2. Opportunities for public involvement in local decision-making 12.1% 9.7% 16.6% 13.6% 9.1% 7.1% 3.7% 3.4% 2.6% 0.7% 2.7% 18.8% Q18-3. Quality of www. meridiancity.org 12.1% 16.2% 20.2% 12.9% 8.0% 5.8% 3.0% 2.7% 0.4% 0.6% 1.0% 17.2% Q18-4. Usefulness of online services available on City of Meridian's website(bill pay/ class registration) 17.0% 17.9% 16.9% 12.4% 6.1% 3.7% 1.8% 1.0% 0.9% 0.4% 0.9% 21.0% Q18-5.Quality of information about City programs&services 12.6% 13.9% 17.6% 12.5% 7.7% 7.7% 2.3% 2.3% 0.9% 0.6% 1.4% 20.6% Page 690 ETC Institute (2020) Page 25 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q18.The City uses a variety of methods to communicate with the public, including its website, social media such as Nextdoor, Facebook and Twitter, traditional media such as newspapers, radio, and television, and a bi-weekly newsletter. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following communication services. (without "don't know") (N=704) Excelle- nt 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor Q18-1. Effectiveness of City communications with the public 18.3% 15.9% 22.6% 15.8% 9.3% 9.3% 3.5% 2.5% 0.9% 0.0% 1.9% Q18-2.Opportunities for public involvement in local decision-making 14.9% 11.9% 20.5% 16.8% 11.2% 8.7% 4.5% 4.2% 3.1% 0.9% 3.3% Q18-3.Quality of www. meridiancity.org 14.6% 19.6% 24.4% 15.6% 9.6% 7.0% 3.6% 3.3% 0.5% 0.7% 1.2% Q18-4. Usefulness of online services available on City of Meridian's website(bill pay/ class registration) 21.6% 22.7% 21.4% 15.6% 7.7% 4.7% 2.3% 1.3% 1.1% 0.5% 1.1% Q18-5.Quality of information about City programs&services 15.9% 17.5% 22.2% 15.7% 9 7% 9 7% 2 9% 2.9% 1.1% 0.7% 1.8% Page 691 ETC Institute (2020) Page 25 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q19. Where do you currently get information about Meridian's services and programs? Q19.Where do you currently get information about Meridian's services&programs Number Percent City website 380 54.0% Social media (Nextdoor, Facebook,Twitter, Instagram) 369 52.4% Television/news 221 31.4% Flyers in utility bills 287 40.8% Information booklets/City publications 80 11.4% Newspaper 107 15.2% Radio 76 10.8% Emails from City 322 45.7% Events such as Coffee with the Mayor,Town Halls 25 3.6% Other source 12 1.7% Total 1879 Q19-10. Other source: Q19-10.Other Number Percent HOA AND NEXTDOOR APP 1 8.3% I HAVE NOT SOUGHT INFO 1 8.3% MAIL 3 25.0% NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTION EMAILS 1 8.3% Newsletter received 1 8.3% Nextdoor app 1 8.3% Search online 1 8.3% Tully Park 1 8.3% WORD OF MOUTH 2 16.7% Total 12 100.0% Page 692 ETC Institute (2020) Page 25 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q20. Did you visit downtown Meridian at least once during the past year for a purpose other than work? Q20. Did you visit Downtown Meridian at least once during past year for a purpose other than work Number Percent Yes 597 84.8% No 91 12.9% Not provided 16 2.3% Total 704 100.0% • • ' • 3 Q20. Did you visit downtown Meridian at least once during the past year for a purpose other than work? (without "not provided") Q20. Did you visit Downtown Meridian at least once during past year for a purpose other than work Number Percent Yes 597 86.8% No 91 13.2% Total 688 100.0% Q20a. When you think about Downtown,why didn't you visit in the last year? Q20a.Why didn't you visit Downtown Meridian in last year Number Percent Lack of parking 32 35.2% Lack of open space 2 2.2% Not enough variety of shopping 25 27.5% Not enough variety of restaurants 11 12.1% Lack of walkability 1 1.1% Not provided 20 22.0% Total 91 100.0% Q20a. When you think about Downtown,why didn't you visit in the last year? (without "not provided") Q20a.Why didn't you visit Downtown Meridian in last year Number Percent Lack of parking 32 45.1% Lack of open space 2 2.8% Not enough variety of shopping 25 35.2% Not enough variety of restaurants 11 15.5% Lack of walkability 1 1.4% Total 71 100.0% Page 693 ETC Institute (2020) Page 25 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q21. In general, would you favor or oppose allowing residents of a City the ability to vote on a temporary sales tax (local option tax) increase to provide funding for identified infrastructure improvements in the community? Q21.Would you favor or oppose allowing City residents the ability to vote on a temporary sales tax increase Number Percent Favor 292 41.5% Oppose 247 35.1% Not sure 165 23.4% Total 704 100.0% Page 694 ETC Institute (2020) Page 25 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q22. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "High Priority" and 0 means "No Priority," please rate the importance of the following community issues. (N=704) High No Don't priority 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 priority know Q22-1. Roads/traffic/ transportation 58.5% 16.5% 12.5% 6.3% 1.4% 1.0% 0.6% 0.6% 0.4% 0.3% 0.4% 1.6% Q22-2. Growth/development 49.4% 17.2% 12.2% 5.4% 4.0% 3.6% 1.3% 1.6% 0.7% 1.1% 1.4% 2.1% Q22-3. Education/schools 53.3% 16.9% 11.9% 4.1% 3.7% 2.4% 0.7% 0.4% 1.0% 0.4% 0.7% 4.4% Q22-4. Homelessness/social services 12.4% 9.8% 15.2% 16.2% 8.8% 11.5% 4.1% 3.7% 3.6% 2.4% 3.6% 8.8% Q22-5.Affordable housing 22.3% 12.2% 15.6% 11.5% 6.5% 9.4% 3.4% 3.0% 3.6% 2.3% 4.4% 5.8% Q22-6.Jobs/economic development 24.0% 20.0% 19.6% 10.2% 7.2% 6.8% 1.7% 1.0% 0.6% 0.9% 1.3% 6.7% Q22-7. Public transportation 18.9% 11.5% 13.4% 14.3% 9.2% 10.9% 3.7% 3.8% 2.3% 3.4% 3.7% 4.8% Q22-8. Downtown redevelopment 10.8% 10.2% 15.2% 14.9% 10.8% 13.9% 4.3% 5.0% 2.7% 3.6% 4.3% 4.4% Q22-9. Pathway/sidewalk connections 19.0% 14.9% 17.5% 14.3% 9.9% 9.8% 3.3% 2.0% 1.6% 1.7% 1.8% 4.1% Q22-10.City tax burden 17.9% 9.8% 15.3% 13.2% 9.9% 9.1% 2.1% 2.7% 1.0% 1.1% 2.0% 15.8% Q22-11.Telecommunications (cell phone/internet service) 19.3% 13.1% 15.1% 14.2% 10.7% 8.1% 3.4% 3.4% 1.7% 1.4% 3.3% 6.4% Q22-12.Access to mental health services 17.0% 13.9% 12.9% 11.9% 7.0% 10.4% 2.6% 3.3% 3.1% 2.3% 3.3% 12.4% Page 695 ETC Institute (2020) Page 25 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q22. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "High Priority" and 0 means "No Priority," please rate the importance of the following community issues. (without "don't know") (N=704) High No priority 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 priority Q22-1. Roads/traffic/ transportation 59.5% 16.7% 12.7% 6.3% 1.4% 1.0% 0.6% 0.6% 0.4% 0.3% 0.4% Q22-2.Growth/development 50.5% 17.6% 12.5% 5.5% 4.1% 3.6% 1.3% 1.6% 0.7% 1.2% 1.5% Q22-3. Education/schools 55.7% 17.7% 12.5% 4.3% 3.9% 2.5% 0.7% 0.4% 1.0% 0.4% 0.7% Q22-4. Homelessness/social services 13.6% 10.7% 16.7% 17.8% 9.7% 12.6% 4.5% 4.0% 3.9% 2.6% 3.9% Q22-5.Affordable housing 23.7% 13.0% 16.6% 12.2% 6.9% 10.0% 3.6% 3.2% 3.8% 2.4% 4.7% Q22-6.Jobs/economic development 25.7% 21.5% 21.0% 11.0% 7.8% 7.3% 1.8% 1.1% 0.6% 0.9% 1.4% Q22-7. Public transportation 19.9% 12.1% 14.0% 15.1% 9.7% 11.5% 3.9% 4.0% 2.4% 3.6% 3.9% Q22-8. Downtown redevelopment 11.3% 10.7% 15.9% 15.6% 11.3% 14.6% 4.5% 5.2% 2.8% 3.7% 4.5% Q22-9. Pathway/sidewalk connections 19.9% 15.6% 18.2% 15.0% 10.4% 10.2% 3.4% 2.1% 1.6% 1.8% 1.9% Q22-10.City tax burden 21.2% 11.6% 18.2% 15.7% 11.8% 10.8% 2.5% 3.2% 1.2% 1.3% 2.4% Q22-11.Telecommunications (cell phone/internet service) 20.6% 14.0% 16.1% 15.2% 11.4% 8.6% 3.6% 3.6% 1.8% 1.5% 3.5% Q22-12.Access to mental health services 19.4% 15.9% 14.7% 13.6% 7.9% 11.8% 2.9% 3.7% 3.6% 2.6% 3.7% Page 696 ETC Institute (2020) Page 25 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q23. Which THREE of the priorities listed in Question 22 do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders over the next THREE years? Q23.Top choice Number Percent Roads/traffic/transportation 262 37.2% Growth/development 134 19.0% Education/schools 142 20.2% Homelessness/social services 6 0.9% Affordable housing 36 5.1% Jobs/economic development 13 1.8% Public transportation 15 2.1% Downtown redevelopment 7 1.0% Pathway/sidewalk connections 20 2.8% City tax burden 18 2.6% Telecommunications(cell phone/internet service) 13 1.8% Access to mental health services 14 2.0% None chosen 24 3.4% Total 704 100.0% Q23. Which THREE of the priorities listed in Question 22 do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders over the next THREE years? Q23.2nd choice Number Percent Roads/traffic/transportation 149 21.2% Growth/development 183 26.0% Education/schools 113 16.1% Homelessness/social services 16 2.3% Affordable housing 40 5.7% Jobs/economic development 31 4.4% Public transportation 27 3.8% Downtown redevelopment 18 2.6% Pathway/sidewalk connections 36 5.1% City tax burden 21 3.0% Telecommunications(cell phone/internet service) 19 2.7% Access to mental health services 16 2.3% None chosen 35 5.0% Total 704 100.0% Page 697 ETC Institute (2020) Page 25 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q23. Which THREE of the priorities listed in Question 22 do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders over the next THREE years? Q23.3rd choice Number Percent Roads/traffic/transportation 83 11.8% Growth/development 76 10.8% Education/schools 122 17.3% Homelessness/social services 16 2.3% Affordable housing 46 6.5% Jobs/economic development 73 10.4% Public transportation 52 7.4% Downtown redevelopment 34 4.8% Pathway/sidewalk connections 48 6.8% City tax burden 34 4.8% Telecommunications(cell phone/internet service) 31 4.4% Access to mental health services 38 5.4% None chosen 51 7.2% Total 704 100.0% M71rerArIT-MR.Tem Q23. Which THREE of the priorities listed in Question 22 do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders over the next THREE years? (top 3) Q23.Sum of top 3 choices Number Percent Roads/traffic/transportation 494 70.2% Growth/development 393 55.8% Education/schools 377 53.6% Homelessness/social services 38 5.4% Affordable housing 122 17.3% Jobs/economic development 117 16.6% Public transportation 94 13.4% Downtown redevelopment 59 8.4% Pathway/sidewalk connections 104 14.8% City tax burden 73 10.4% Telecommunications(cell phone/internet service) 63 8.9% Access to mental health services 68 9.7% None chosen 24 3.4% Total 2026 Page 698 ETC Institute (2020) Page 25 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q24.The City of Meridian rapidly moved to remote and online offering of services during the COVID-19 Stay-at-Home orders issued by the State. In the last six months, have you sought City services that required you to conduct business with the City online or remote? Q24. Have you sought City services that required you to conduct business with City online or remote in last six months Number Percent Yes 115 16.3% No 586 83.2% Not provided 3 0.4% Total 704 100.0% • • ' • 3 Q24.The City of Meridian rapidly moved to remote and online offering of services during the COVID-19 Stay-at-Home orders issued by the State. In the last six months, have you sought City services that required you to conduct business with the City online or remote? (without "not provided") Q24. Have you sought City services that required you to conduct business with City online or remote in last six months Number Percent Yes 115 16.4% No 586 83.6% Total 701 100.0% Page 699 ETC Institute (2020) Page 26 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q24a. Please rate the quality of service you received for the following services. (N=115) Excell- Don't ent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor know Q24a-1. Building Inspection Services 8.7% 3.5% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 2.6% 76.5% Q24a-2. Building Permit Plan Review Services 6.1% 2.6% 4.3% 3.5% 1.7% 0.0% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.9% 78.3% Q24a-3. Development Application Submittal Services 3.5% 3.5% 2.6% 0.9% 1.7% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 86.1% Q24a-4.City Council Public Hearing&Testimony Services 7.8% 8.7% 0.0% 3.5% 2.6% 1.7% 0.0% 1.7% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 73.0% Q24a-5.Online License Renewal Services(alcohol, dog licenses, passports) 19.1% 3.5% 9.6% 4.3% 3.5% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 2.6% 53.9% WITHOUTD• KNOW" Q24a. Please rate the quality of service you received for the following services. (without "don't know") (N=115) Excelle- nt 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor Q24a-1. Building Inspection Services 37.0% 14.8% 7.4% 7.4% 7.4% 7.4% 0.0% 3.7% 0.0% 3.7% 11.1% Q24a-2. Building Permit Plan Review Services 28.0% 12.0% 20.0% 16.0% 8.0% 0.0% 4.0% 4.0% 0.0% 4.0% 4.0% Q24a-3. Development Application Submittal Services 25.0% 25.0% 18.8% 6.3% 12.5% 0.0% 6.3% 0.0% 6.3% 0.0% 0.0% Q24a-4.City Council Public Hearing&Testimony Services 29.0% 32.3% 0.0% 12.9% 9.7% 6.5% 0.0% 6.5% 3.2% 0.0% 0.0% Q24a-5.Online License Renewal Services(alcohol, dog licenses, passports) 41.5% 7.5% 20.8% 9.4% 7.5% 5.7% 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% 0.0% 5.7% Page 700 ETC Institute (2020) Page 26 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q25. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "High Priority" and 0 means "No Priority," please rate the importance of the City Council addressing the following housing affordability issues. (N=704) High No Don't priority 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 priority know Q25-1. Develop design standards for affordable housing elements 18.6% 13.9% 14.3% 10.2% 8.0% 8.1% 2.0% 2.7% 1.6% 2.6% 5.7% 12.4% Q25-2 Require certain quantity of units in development projects to have affordable housing elements 14.8% 10.7% 10.4% 8.8% 7.2% 8.9% 4.0% 4.0% 3.1% 6.1% 9.5% 12.5% Q25-3. Provide reduced development standards for projects containing affordable housing elements 4.8% 6.0% 6.1% 6.1% 7.0% 9.7% 4.7% 6.0% 5.8% 10.5% 16.5% 16.9% Q25-4. Participate in State discussions on property tax legislation 26.1% 15.5% 14.9% 9.4% 6.3% 6.8% 1.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.4% 2.4% 14.6% Q25-5. Increase development densities via duplexes, apartments,townhomes,& other multi-family designs 7.8% 5.3% 6.4% 8.5% 6.0% 9.4% 2.8% 7.4% 5.1% 12.8% 18.9°% 9 7°% Page 701 ETC Institute (2020) Page 26 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. WITHOUT D• KNOW" Q25. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "High Priority" and 0 means "No Priority," please rate the importance of the City Council addressing the following housing affordability issues. (without "don't know") (N=704) High No priority 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 priority Q25-1. Develop design standards for affordable housing elements 21.2% 15.9% 16.4% 11.7% 9.1% 9.2% 2.3% 3.1% 1.8% 2.9% 6.5% Q25-2 Require certain quantity of units in development projects to have affordable housing elements 16.9% 12.2% 11.9% 10.1% 8.3% 10.2% 4.5% 4.5% 3.6% 7.0% 10.9% Q25-3. Provide reduced development standards for projects containing affordable housing elements 5.8% 7.2% 7.4% 7.4% 8.4% 11.6% 5.6% 7.2% 7.0% 12.6% 19.8% Q25-4. Participate in State discussions on property tax legislation 30.6% 18.1% 17.5% 11.0% 7.3% 8.0% 2.2% 1.0% 1.0% 0.5% 2.8% Q25-5. Increase development densities via duplexes, apartments,townhomes,& other multi-family designs 8.6% 5.8% 7.1% 9.4% 6.6% 10.4% 3.1% 8.2% 5.7% 14.2% 20.9% Page 702 ETC Institute (2020) Page 26 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q26. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the City's level of effort in the enforcement of the following public safety and traffic areas. (N=704) Excell- Don't ent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor know Q26-1. Handheld use of cell phones&texting while driving 18.5% 8.1% 12.6% 7.4% 5.0% 5.7% 2.7% 2.7% 4.3% 1.8% 9.5% 21.7% Q26-2.Speeding in neighborhoods 10.8% 6.4% 13.5% 9.4% 7.0% 8.9% 6.4% 5.3% 4.3% 3.0% 10.4% 14.8% Q26-3. Red light violations 9.7% 6.5% 12.1% 7.1% 5.3% 9.2% 4.4% 3.8% 4.0% 3.1% 9.2% 25.6% Q26-4.Tailgating 6.4% 4.0% 8.0% 8.2% 6.7% 10.8% 4.4% 4.7% 4.0% 4.4% 9.2% 29.3% Q26-5.Speeding on arterial roads 9.7% 6.8% 12.9% 9.4% 6.0% 10.4% 5.0% 3.8% 3.3% 3.0% 8.2% 21.6% Q26-6. Excessive motor vehicle sound 6.7% 4.7% 6.5% 5.7% 6.4% 9.2% 5.4% 3.8% 3.6% 5.0% 10.5% 32.5% WITHOUTD• KNOW" Q26. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the City's level of effort in the enforcement of the following public safety and traffic areas. (without "don't know") (N=704) Excelle- nt 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor Q26-1. Handheld use of cell phones&texting while driving 23.6% 10.3% 16.2% 9.4% 6.4% 7.3% 3.4% 3.4% 5.4% 2.4% 12.2% Q26-2.Speeding in neighborhoods 12.7% 7.5% 15.8% 11.0% 8.2% 10.5% 7.5% 6.2% 5.0% 3.5% 12.2% Q26-3. Red light violations 13.0% 8.8% 16.2% 9.5% 7.1% 12.4% 5.9% 5.2% 5.3% 4.2% 12.4% Q26-4.Tailgating 9.0% 5.6% 11.2% 11.6% 9.4% 15.3% 6.2% 6.6% 5.6% 6.2% 13.1% Q26-5.Speeding on arterial roads 12.3% 8.7% 16.5% 12.0% 7.6% 13.2% 6.3% 4.9% 4.2% 3.8% 10.5% Q26-6. Excessive motor vehicle sound 9.9% 6.9% 9.7% 8.4% 9.5% 13.7% 8.0% 5.7% 5.3% 7.4% 15.6% Page 703 ETC Institute (2020) Page 26 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q27. Do you feel the level of police presence in your neighborhood is sufficient, ensuring that Meridian communities remain a safe place for citizens? Q27. Is the level of police presence in your neighborhood sufficient, ensuring that Meridian communities remain a safe place for citizens Number Percent Yes 441 62.6% No 156 22.2% Not sure 107 15.2% Total 704 100.0% Q29. Your gender? Q29.Your gender Number Percent Male 346 49.1% Female 349 49.6% Not provided 9 1.3% Total 704 100.0% Q29. Your gender? (without "not provided") Q29.Your gender Number Percent Male 346 49.8% Female 349 50.2% Total 695 100.0% Q30. What is your age? Q30.Your age Number Percent 18 to 34 138 19.6% 35 to 44 137 19.5% 45 to 54 139 19.7% 55 to 64 144 20.5% 65+ 146 20.7% Total 704 100.0% Page 704 ETC Institute (2020) Page 26 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q31. Which of the following best describes the home in which you live? Q31.Which following best describes the home in which you live Number Percent A manufactured trailer or mobile home 2 0.3% An apartment 5 0.7% A condominium 1 0.1% Townhouse or duplex 27 3.8% A detached single-family house 661 93.9% Not provided 8 1.1% Total 704 100.0% Q31. Which of the following best describes the home in which you live? (without "not provided") Q31.Which following best describes the home in which you live Number Percent A manufactured trailer or mobile home 2 0.3% An apartment 5 0.7% A condominium 1 0.1% Townhouse or duplex 27 3.9% A detached single-family house 661 95.0% Total 696 100.0% Q32. Do you own or rent your home? Q32. Do you own or rent your home Number Percent Own 604 85.8% Rent 95 13.5% Other 1 0.1% Don't know 4 0.6% Total 704 100.0% Q32. Do you own or rent your home? (without "don't know") Q32. Do you own or rent your home Number Percent Own 604 86.3% Rent 95 13.6% Other 1 0.1% Total 700 100.0% Q32-3. Other Q32-3.Other Number Percent Renting while home is being built 1 100.0% Total 1 100.0% Page 705 ETC Institute (2020) Page 26 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q33. How many years have you lived in Meridian? Q33. How many years have you lived in Meridian Number Percent 0-5 251 35.7% 6-10 129 18.3% 11-15 106 15.1% 16-20 77 10.9% 21-30 87 12.4% 31+ 45 6.4% Not provided 9 1.3% Total 704 100.0% Q33. How many years have you lived in Meridian? (without "not provided") Q33. How many years have you lived in Meridian Number Percent 0-5 251 36.1% 6-10 129 18.6% 11-15 106 15.3% 16-20 77 11.1% 21-30 87 12.5% 31+ 45 6.5% Total 695 100.0% Page 706 ETC Institute (2020) Page 26 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q33. How many months have you lived in Meridian? Q33. How many months have you lived in Meridian Number Percent 0 42 6.0% 1 46 6.5% 2 52 7.4% 3 48 6.8% 4 38 5.4% 5 22 3.1% 6 49 7.0% 7 30 4.3% 8 15 2.1% 9 35 5.0% 10+ 60 8.5% Not provided 267 37.9% Total 704 100.0% Q33. How many months have you lived in Meridian? (without "not provided") Q33. How many months have you lived in Meridian Number Percent 0 42 9.6% 1 46 10.5% 2 52 11.9% 3 48 11.0% 4 38 8.7% 5 22 5.0% 6 49 11.2% 7 30 6.9% 8 15 3.4% 9 35 8.0% 10+ 60 13.7% Total 437 100.0% Q34. Including yourself, how many people in your household are... Mean Sum number 2.91 1955 Under age 5 0.23 153 Ages 5-9 0.29 198 Ages 10-14 0.30 202 Ages 15-17 0.16 106 Ages 18+ 1.93 1296 Page 707 ETC Institute (2020) Page 26 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q35. Does your household have a dog? Q35. Does your household have a dog Number Percent Yes 336 47.7% No 337 47.9% Not provided 31 4.4% Total 704 100.0% Q35. Does your household have a dog? (without "not provided") Q35. Does your household have a dog Number Percent Yes 336 49.9% No 337 50.1% Total 673 100.0% Q35a. How many dogs do you have in your household? Q35a. How many dogs do you have in your household Number Percent One 217 64.6% Two 94 28.0% Three 15 4.5% Four or more 2 0.6% Not provided 8 2.4% Total 336 100.0% Q35a. How many dogs do you have in your household? (without "not provided") Q35a. How many dogs do you have in your household Number Percent One 217 66.2% Two 94 28.7% Three 15 4.6% Four or more 2 0.6% Total 328 100.0% Page 708 ETC Institute (2020) Page 26 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q35b. Do you know that Meridian requires dogs to be licensed annually? Q35b. Do you know that Meridian requires dogs to be licensed annually Number Percent Yes 241 71.7% No 86 25.6% Not provided 9 2.7% Total 336 100.0% • • ' • 3 Q35b. Do you know that Meridian requires dogs to be licensed annually? (without "not provided") Q35b. Do you know that Meridian requires dogs to be licensed annually Number Percent Yes 241 73.7% No 86 26.3% Total 327 100.0% Page 709 ETC Institute (2020) Page 27 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q36. Which ONE of the following best describes your current employment status? Q36.What best describes your current employment status Number Percent Employed full time 363 51.6% Employed part time 40 5.7% Self-employed 56 8.0% Not employed outside home,a homemaker 39 5.5% Retired 176 25.0% A student working part time 3 0.4% Not employed due to a disability 3 0.4% Not employed, but seeking work 8 1.1% Not employed, but not seeking work 3 0.4% Other 3 0.4% Not provided 10 1.4% Total 704 100.0% Q36. Which ONE of the following best describes your current employment status? (without "not provided") Q36.What best describes your current employment status Number Percent Employed full time 363 52.3% Employed part time 40 5.8% Self-employed 56 8.1% Not employed outside home,a homemaker 39 5.6% Retired 176 25.4% A student working part time 3 0.4% Not employed due to a disability 3 0.4% Not employed, but seeking work 8 1.2% Not employed, but not seeking work 3 0.4% Other 3 0.4% Total 694 100.0% Q36-12. Other Q36-12.Other Number Percent Disability 1 33.3% Disabled veteran 1 33.3% Unpaid intern 1 33.3% Total 3 100.0% Page 710 ETC Institute (2020) Page 27 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q37. What is the approximate total annual family income of all members of your household? Q37.What is approximate total annual family income Number Percent Less than$20K 32 4.5% $20K-$34,999 51 7.2% $35K-$49,999 115 16.3% $50K-$74,999 127 18.0% $75K-$99,999 98 13.9% $100K-$149,999 96 13.6% $150K-$199,999 73 10.4% $200K+ 29 4.1% Not sure 83 11.8% Total 704 100.0% Q37. What is the approximate total annual family income of all members of your household? (without "not sure" Q37.What is approximate total annual family income Number Percent Less than$20K 32 5.2% $20K-$34,999 51 8.2% $35K-$49,999 115 18.5% $50K-$74,999 127 20.5% $75K-$99,999 98 15.8% $100K-$149,999 96 15.5% $150K-$199,999 73 11.8% $200K+ 29 4.7% Total 621 100.0% Q38. How do you make and receive phones calls? Q38. How do you make& receive phones calls Number Percent Landline 12 1.7% Cell phone 571 81.1% Both 113 16.1% Not provided 8 1.1% Total 704 100.0% Q38. How do you make and receive phones calls? (without "not provided") Q38. How do you make&receive phones calls Number Percent Landline 12 1.7% Cell phone 571 82.0% Both 113 16.2% Total 696 100.0% Page 711 ETC Institute (2020) Page 27 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q38a. Do you primarily use your cell phone, landline or both to make and receive calls? Q38a. Do you primarily use your cell phone, landline or both to make&receive calls Number Percent Primarily use cell phone 42 37.2% Primarily use landline 18 15.9% Both 50 44.2% Not provided 3 2.7% Total 113 100.0% Q38a. Do you primarily use your cell phone, landline or both to make and receive calls? (without "not provided") Q38a. Do you primarily use your cell phone, landline or both to make&receive calls Number Percent Primarily use cell phone 42 38.2% Primarily use landline 18 16.4% Both 50 45.5% Total 110 100.0% Q38b. Who is your cell phone service provider? Q38b.Who is your cell phone service provider Number Percent Verizon 333 58.3% AT&T 73 12.8% Sprint 31 5.4% T-Mobile 78 13.7% Other 46 8.1% Not provided 10 1.8% Total 571 100.0% Q38b. Who is your cell phone service provider? (without "not provided") Q38b.Who is your cell phone service provider Number Percent Verizon 333 59.4% AT&T 73 13.0% Sprint 31 5.5% T-Mobile 78 13.9% Other 46 8.2% Total 561 100.0% Page 712 ETC Institute (2020) Page 27 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Q38b-5. Other Q38b-5. Other Number Percent Boost 1 2.3% Consumer Cellular 5 11.6% Cricket 8 18.6% Family Mobile 1 2.3% Google 2 4.7% Google Fi 4 9.3% Inland Cellular 1 2.3% Metro PCS 2 4.7% Mint Mobile 1 2.3% Project Fi 1 2.3% Republic Wireless 2 4.7% Straight Talk 7 16.3% Tracfone 3 7.0% US Cellular 1 2.3% Visible Wireless 3 7.0% Walmart Family Mobile 1 2.3% Total 43 100.0% Page 713 ETC Institute (2020) Page 27 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Section 6 Survey Instrument Page 714 ETC Institute (2020) Page 27 City of Meridian 2020 Citizen Survey Findings Report: Final Item#26. Mayor Robert E. Simison City Council Members: IDIAN- Treg Bernt Brad Hoaglun Joe Borton Jessica Perreault Luke Cavener Liz Strader June 2020 Dear Meridian Resident, What do you think? Meridian is issuing this 2020 Citizen Survey to understand the community's perspective on services offered in Meridian. The survey questions focus on the quality of services that are provided both by Meridian directly, and by our service partners. Whether considering public safety needs, our parks and pathways, an emerging downtown, or road and transportation needs, our goal is to understand how you view the quality of these services. As part of this process, you have been randomly selected to participate in this year's survey. We ask that you take the time to help us understand your customer satisfaction with your community so we can improve the quality of services offered in Meridian. The survey is being conducted by ETC Institute, a national market research firm that specializes in conducting surveys for local governments. The survey is entirely voluntary and should take only 10 to 15 minutes of your time. We ask that you complete it as soon as possible. You can either complete the written survey and return it in the mail using the postage paid envelope, or complete the survey online at www.meridian202Osurvey.org. Please know that regardless of how you complete the survey, your responses will be completely confidential and combined with the responses of other Meridian residents. Thank you in advance for your participation and feedback. The information we obtain from this survey is critical to understanding the needs of Meridian residents. If you have questions about the survey, please contact the City of Meridian Mayor's Office at 208- 489-0529. Otherwise, you can look for the survey results to be posted on the City of Meridian's website (www.meridiancity.org) by early fall. Sincerely, Robe 6E. orisonMayo Page 715 ETC Institute (202ayor's Office . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642 Page 27 Prone 208-489-0529 . Fax 208-884-8119 . www.meridiancity.org Item#26. Clt�(,Qf er ll ll O IVIenaian izen z5urvey al Please take a few;minnutes to complete this survey. Your input is an EIDIAh� =-- important part of the City's on-going effort to improve the quality of services provided in the City. You may also complete this survey on-line by going to www.meridiancitysurvey.orq. If you have questions, please call the Mayor's Office at (208) 489-0529. Thank you! 1. The vision for Meridian is: "By 2035, Meridian will be the West's premier community in which to live, work and raise a family." Several items that may influence your perception of Meridian as a community are listed below. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the City of Meridian in the following areas. Excellent Poor D. • 01. Asa place to live 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 02. Asa place to work 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 03. Asa place to raise a family 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 04. Asa place to start/do business 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 05. As a city that is building a strong sense of community 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 06. As a city that is developing a strong local economy 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 07 As a city that is developing a strong local workforce that can 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 compete in toda 's economic climate 08. As a city that is planning for future growth and development 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 09. As a city that is developing a sustainable and conscious environment 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 10. How well the City is protecting the quality of the air and water 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 11. How well the City is maintaining high quality neighborhoods 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 12. How well the City is providing options for mobility other than driving 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 13. How well the City is ensuring public safety 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 14. How well the City is communicating with the community 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 2. While the City is not the sole contributor to your quality of life, it is important to understand the perceptions residents have of the quality of life in Meridian. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Greatly Exceeds My Expectations" and 0 means "Does Not Meet My Expectations at All," please rate the City and its partners in the following areas. Greatly Exceeds Does Not �. My • • • • • 1. Overall quality of life in the City 10 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 2. Overall quality of city services provided 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 3. Overall quality of customer service you receive from city employees 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 4. Your view of an ideal place to live 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 3. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Strongly Agree" and 0 means "Strongly Disagree," please rate your level of agreement with the following. Strongly StronglyDon't Agree Disagree • 1. Quality housing and a variety of options exist in Meridian 10 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 2. Development in the City enhances the quality of life 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 3. There are a variety of employment opportunities in Meridian 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 4. Access to quality shopping and entertainment exist in Meridian 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 5. The City is managing growth wisely 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 6. Meridian has a sense of community 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 7. The City continuously improves services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 8. The City uses your tax dollars wisely 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 9. The City is headed in the right direction 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 Page 716 ETC Institute (2020) Page 27 you own a home in Meridian, appro ima�e�y z��o2o you�r��fo a pro�eriny�a sbIfigoe'sFioathe City L'�I-elating Meridian to fund the City's operating budget for services such as police,fire and parks services. to services and facilities in the City of Meridian, using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Definitely Getting My Money's Worth" and 0 means "Definitely Not Getting My Money's Worth," please rate the value you feel you are getting for City tax dollars and fees. Definitely Getting My Definitely Not • Don't Money's . •ney's Worth Know 1. Value received for city tax dollars and fees 1 10 1 9 1 8 1 7 1 6 1 5 1 4 1 3 2 1 1 0 99 5. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the quality of the following services provided by the City of Meridian. Don'tExcellent Poor Know 01. Fire/Rescue Services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 02. Fire prevention and public education 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 03. Police department/law enforcement 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 04. Code enforcement 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 05. Traffic enforcement 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 06. Planning &zoning services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 07. Building permit services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 08. Utility billing services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 09. Sewer services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 10. Water services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 11. Garbage/trashpick-up services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 12. Recycling services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 13. City arks 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 14. Recreation programs 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 15. Programs for youth 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 16. Communications 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 17. Passport Acceptance Agency 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 6. Which THREE of the City Services listed above do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from city leaders over the next TWO years? [Write in your answers below using the list from Question 5.] 1 st: 2nd: 3rd: 7. Using a scale of 0 to 10,where 10 means "Excellent"and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following services provided by other agency partners. Don'tExcellent Poor • 01. Public transportation services contracted with Valley Regional Transit 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 02. Animal control contracted with Idaho Humane Society 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 03. Programs for seniors at the Meridian Senior Center 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 04. K-12 education by West Ada School District 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 05. Lakeview Golf Course 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 06. Library services by the Meridian Library District 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 07. Swimming Pool by Western Ada Recreation District 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 08 State Highways operated by Idaho Transportation Department(Eagle 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 Road, Meridian Road, and Chinden Boulevard 09. All city roads operated by Ada County Highway District 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 10. Elections by Ada County Clerk 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 11. Cemetery services by Meridian Cemetery Maintenance District 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 12. Cell/mobile/data service by provider in Meridian area 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 13. Internet service by telecommunications provider in Meridian 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 Page 717 ETC Institute (2020) Page 27 here are a variety of transportationin raastruciure improvements neeYdela a1In�sg Rai s'insMeridian. irem#2s. sing a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "High Priority" and 0 means "No Priority," please rate the following road-related aspects of our community you would like to see. High Priority 0 Know No Priority 1. Roadway widening (from single to multiple lanes) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 2. Intersection improvements 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 3. Pathways/sidewalk connections on local streets 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 4. Sidewalks on arterial (major) roadways 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 5. Street lights 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 6 Shared bike and pedestrian facilities (similar to Boise 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 Greenbelt) detached from roadway 7. Beautification/landscaping Beautification/landscaping 10 9 8 7 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 9. Which THREE of the transportation improvements listed above do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from city leaders in working with partner agencies over the next THREE years? [Write in your answers below using the list from Question 8.] 1 st: 2nd: 3rd: 10. Meridian prioritizes roadway and intersection projects that the Ada County Highway District does not currently have in their budget. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "High Priority" and 0 means "No Priority," please rate your priority of the following future roadway construction projects in our community. High Priority No Priority D. Know 1. Construct Linder Road overpass over 1-84 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 2. Widen Locust Grove Rd.from Fairview to Ustick Rd. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 3. Widen Victor Rd. from Locust Grove Rd.to Eagle Rd. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 4. Widen Ustick Rd.from Ten Mile Rd.to Linder Rd. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 5. Widen Linder Rd.from CherryLn. to Ustick Rd. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 11. If a bond measure were placed on the ballot requesting funding for road improvement needs, in general would you support a bond to pay for the identified roadway and intersection projects above in Question 10? (1)Yes (2) No (9) Don't Know 12. Using a scale of 0 to 10,where 10 means"Excellent"and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following parks and recreation services. Excellent Poor D. Know 01. Number of city arks 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 02. Quality, appearance and maintenance of city arks 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 03. Quality of athletic fields 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 04. Number of special events and festivals 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 05. Quality and variety of special events and festivals 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 06. Number of pathways for walking and biking 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 07. Quality of pathways for walking and biking 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 08 Availability of information about recreation programs and classes through 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 social media,Activity Guides, email updates, website, etc. 09. Availability of community center and gym facilities 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 10. Number of recreation programs and classes 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 11. Quality and variety of recreation programs and classes 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 12. Number of adultsports programs and sporting events 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 13. Quality of the adult sports programs and sporting events 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 14. Availability of youth sports programs through partners, such as the Police 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 Activities League (PAL), Meridian Youth Baseball MYB , and others 15. Quality of youth sports programs through partners, such as the Police 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Activities League (PAL), Meridian Youth Baseball (MYB), and others Page 718 ETC Institute (2020) Page 27 n the past 12 months, have you or an�io°ne iinryour nouseko�c�visitvec�ai edjy bsf vr°° 'any park? Item#26. (1)Yes, I have personally visited a city park in the last year (2)Yes, a household member has visited a city park in the last year (3) No 14. Some neighborhoods have a great "sense of community." People know their neighbors from Neighborhood Watch Programs or have block parties and truly think of the others in the same area as "neighbors." Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means a "Very Strong Sense of Community" and 0 means "No Sense of Community at All," please rate the sense of community in your neighborhood. StrongVery Sense No Sense of D. of Community CommunityAtAll Know 1.1 Rating of the"sense of community" in your neighborhood 1 10 M 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 99 15. Public safety has prioritized public outreach using social media, public presentations, citizen academies, and volunteer opportunities like citizen park patrols. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following public safety services. Excellent Poor D. Know 01. Overall feeling of safety in the City 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 02. Quality of local police protection 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 03. How quickly police respond to 911 emergencies 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 04. The visibility of police in neighborhoods 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 05. Safety in city arks 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 06. Police safety education programs 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 07. Professionalism of employees responding to emergencies 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 08. Overall quality of the fire department 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 09. How quickly fire department responds to 911 emergencies 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 10. Quality of Emergency Medical Services EMS 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 11. Fire safety education programs 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 12. Current location of fire stations 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 13. Fire department public outreach 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 16. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the City's efforts in the enforcement of the following codes and ordinances. Excellent Poor D. Know 1. Weed abatement 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 2. Removal of graffiti 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 3. Abandoned/junk automobile removal 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 4. Clean-up of litter and debris on private property 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 5. Dilapidated houses or buildings 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 6. Illegal dumping 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 17. Do you have a working smoke detector in your home? (1)Yes (2) No (9) Don't Know Page 719 ETC Institute (2020) Page 28 he City uses a variety of methods 0 c°ommeuinicateOwIhC�tt a pu��c,�Inc�udi gR s�A si�el, social Item#26. edia such as Nextdoor, Facebook and Twitter, traditional media such as newspapers, radio, and elevision, and a bi-weekly newsletter. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following communication services. Excellent Poor Do Know 1. Effectiveness of city communications with the public 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 2. 0 portunities for public involvement in local decision-making 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 3. Quality of www.meridiancity.org 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 4 The usefulness of the online services available on the City of 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 Meridian's website bill pay/class registration) 5. Quality of information about city programs and services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 19. Where do you currently get information about Meridian's services and programs? [Check all that apply.] (01) City website (07) Radio (02) Social Media(Nextdoor, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram) (08) Emails from the City (03) Television/news (09) Events such as Coffee with the Mayor, (04) Flyers in utility bills Town Halls (05) Information booklets/city publications (10) Other Source: (06) Newspaper 20. Did you visit downtown Meridian at least once during the past year for a purpose other than work? (1)Yes(Skip to Q21.1 (2) No(Answer Q20a.] (3) Don't remember 20a. When you think about downtown, why didn't you visit in the last year? (1) Lack of parking (3) Not enough variety of shopping (5) Lack of walkability (2) Lack of open space (4) Not enough variety of restaurants 21. In general, would you favor or oppose allowing residents of a city the ability to vote on a temporary sales tax (local option tax) increase to provide funding for identified infrastructure improvements in the community? (1) Favor (2) Oppose (3) Not sure 22. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "High Priority" and 0 means "No Priority," please rate the importance of the following community issues. High Priority No Priority Don't Know 01. Roads/Traffic/Trans portation 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 02. Growth/Development 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 03. Education/Schools 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 04. Homelessness/Social Services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 05. Affordable Housing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 06. Jobs/Economic Development 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 07. Public Transportation 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 08. Downtown redevelopment 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 09. Pathway/sidewalk connections 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 10. City Tax burden 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 11. Telecommunications cell hone/internet service 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 12. Access to Mental Health Services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 23. Which THREE of the priorities listed above do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from city leaders over the next THREE years? [Write in your answers below using the list from Question 22.] 1 st: 2nd: 3rd: Page 720 ETC Institute (2020) Page 28 he City of Meridian rapidly moved-1'� emo a a�n�on�ine�to�ffering of services R(Or°ing t ie cOVID- item#2s. 9 Stay-at-Home orders issued by the State. In the last six months, have you sought City services that required you to conduct business with the City online or remote? (1)Yes[Answer Q24a.] (2) No[Skip to Q25.] 24a. Please rate the quality of service you received for the following services. 9 1. BuildingInspection Services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 9 2. Building Permit Plan Review Services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 3. Development Application Submittal Services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 4. City Council Public Hearing&Testimony Services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 5. Online License Renewal Services (Alcohol, Dog Licenses, Passports) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 25. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "High Priority" and 0 means "No Priority," please rate the importance of the City Council addressing the following housing affordability issues. High No Priori D. Priority 1. Develop design standards for affordable housing elements 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 2 Require certain quantity of units in development projects to have 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 affordable housing elements 3 Provide reduced development standards for projects containing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 affordable housing elements 4. Participate in State discussions on property tax legislation 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 5 Increase development densities via duplexes, apartments, 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 townhomes, and other multi-family designs 26. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the City's level of effort in the enforcement of the following public safety and traffic areas. Excellent Poor 1 D. Know 1. Handheld use of cell phones&texting while driving 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 2. Speeding in neighborhoods 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 3. Red light violations 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 4. Tailgating 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 5. Speeding on arterial roads 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 6. Excessive motor vehicle sound 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 27. Do you feel the level of police presence in your neighborhood is sufficient, ensuring that Meridian communities remain a safe place for citizens? (1)Yes (2) No (3) Not sure 28. Use the space below to address any additional comments you wish to share with the City of Meridian. DEMOGRAPHICS 29. Your gender? (1) Male (2) Female 30. What is your age? (1) 18 to 24 (3) 35 to 44 (5) 55 to 64 (2) 25 to 34 (4)45 to 54 (6) 65 or older Page 721 ETC Institute (2020) Page 28 hich of the following best describCesyt f Mri eian 2 20ICiyouliveryey Findings Report: Final Item#26. (1)A manufactured trailer or mobile home (4)Townhouse or duplex (2)An apartment (5)A detached single-family house (3)A condominium (6)Other: 32. Do you own or rent your home? (1) Own (2) Rent (3) Other: (9) Don't know 33. How many years and months have you lived in Meridian? years months 34. Including yourself, how many people in your household are... Under Age 5: Ages 5-9: Ages 10-14: Ages 15-17: Ages 18 and over: 35. Does your household have a dog? (1)Yes[Answer Q35a-b.] (2) No[Skip to Q36.] 35a. How many dogs do you have in your household? (1)One (2)Two (3)Three (4) Four or more 35b. Do you know that Meridian requires dogs to be licensed annually? (1)Yes (2) No 36. Which ONE of the following best describes your current employment status? (01) Employed full time (07)A student working full time (02) Employed part time (08)A student working part time (03)Self-employed (09) Not employed due to a disability (04) Not employed outside the home; a homemaker (10) Not employed, but seeking work (05) Retired (11) Not employed, but NOT seeking work (06)A full-time student, not working (12) Other: 37. What is the approximate total annual family income of all members of your household? (01) Less than$20,000 (04)$50,000-$74,999 (07) 150,000-$199,999 (02) $20,000-$34,999 (05)$75,000-$99,999 (08)$200,000 or more (03) $35,000-$49,999 (06)$100,000-$149,999 (09) Not sure 38. How do you make and receive phones calls? (1) Landline (2) Cell phone[Answer Q38b.] (3) Both[Answer Q38a-b.] 38a. Do you primarily use your cell phone, landline or both to make and receive calls? (1) Primarily use cell phone (2) Primarily use landline (3) Both 38b. Who is your cell phone service provider? (1)Verizon (2)AT&T (3) Sprint (4)T-Mobile (5) Other: This concludes the survey. Thank you for your time! Please return your completed survey in the enclosed postage paid envelope addressed to: ETC Institute, 725 W. Frontier Circle, Olathe, KS 66061 Your responses will remain completely confidential. The information printed to the right will ONLY be used to help identify which areas of the City are having problems with city services. If your address is not correct, please provide the correct information.Thank you. Page 722 ETC Institute (2020) Page 28 Item#27. (:> E IDIAN*-----, AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ordinance No. 20-1895: An Ordinance (H-2020-0042 - Compass Charter School East Expansion) for Annexation of a Parcel of Land Within the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,Ada County, Idaho, as Described in Attachment"A" and Annexing Certain Lands and Territory, Situated in Ada County, Idaho, and Adjacent and Contiguous to the Corporate Limits of the City of Meridian as Requested by the City of Meridian; Establishing and Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification of 10.501 Acres of Land From RUT to R-15 (Medium-High Density Residential) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code; Providing That Copies of This Ordinance Shall be Filed with the Ada County Assessor,the Ada County Recorder,And the Idaho State Tax Commission, as Required by Law; and Providing for a Summary of the Ordinance; and Providing for a Waiver of the Reading Rules; and Providing an Effective Date Page 723 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-117722 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 09/10/2020 10:54 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 20-1895 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, HOAGLUN, PERREAULT, STRADER AN ORDINANCE (H-2020-0042 — COMPASS CHARTER SCHOOL EAST EXPANSION) FOR ANNEXATION OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AS DESCRIBED IN ATTACHMENT "A" AND ANNEXING CERTAIN LANDS AND TERRITORY, SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; ESTABLISHING AND DETERMINING THE LAND USE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 10.501 ACRES OF LAND FROM RUT TO R-15 (MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT IN THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. That the following described land as evidenced by attached Legal Description herein incorporated by reference as Exhibit "A" are within the corporate limits of the City of Meridian,Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for annexation and re-zoning by the owner of said property, to-wit: Compass Charter School. SECTION 2. That the above-described real property is hereby annexed and re-zoned from RUT to R-15 (Medium High Density Residential) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code. SECTION 3. That the City has authority pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and zone said property. SECTION 4. That the City has complied with all the noticing requirements pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and re-zone said property. SECTION 5. That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps, and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 6. All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed,rescinded and annulled. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. SECTION 8. The Clerk of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a map prepared in a draftsman manner, including the lands herein rezoned, with the following officials of the County of Ada, State of Idaho, to-wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho. SECTION 9. That pursuant to the affirmative vote of one-half(1/2) plus one (1) of the Members of the full Council,the rule requiring two(2)separate readings by title and one(1)reading in full be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval and publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 8th day of September , 2020. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO,this 8th day of September , 2020. MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON, CITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO, ) County of Ada ) ss: On this 8th day of September 2020,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared ROBERT E.SIMISON and CHRIS JOHNSON known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk,respectively,of the City of Meridian,Idaho,and who executed the within instrument,and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO RESIDING AT: Meridian, Idaho MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:3-28-2020 Item#27. EXHIBIT A *wj FOX 1W LAND SURVEYS engineering EXHIBIT"A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION ANNEXATION PARCEL A parcel of land within the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 10,Township 3 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,being all that property granted under PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES CORRECTION DEED Instrument No.108011815 together with existing Ada County Highway District Right-of-Way more particularly described as follows. COMMENCING at the Corner of Sections 9,10,15&16 the intersection of W.Franklin Road and N.Black Cat Road,from which the Quarter Corner to Sections 10 and 15 South 89°15'37"East,2640.62 feet; Thence along said line Section line common to Sections 10 and 15,South 89'15'37"East,908.47 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence leaving said Section line,North 00'35'11"East,1087.87 feet to a found 1/2"iron Pin with no cap,set plastic cap marked"FLSI PLS7612"; Thence North 89'15'44"West,205.90 feet to a found 5/8"Iron Pin with plastic cap marked"FLS]PLS12646"; Thence South 00'36'41"West,1087.86 feet to the Section line common to said Sections 10 and 15; Thence along said Section line,South 89°15'37"East,206.37 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 224,249 square feet or 5.148 acres,more or less. Refer to the accompanying"Exhibit B Annexation Sketch". Any modification of this description shall render it void. This description represents a surveyed boundary of the land described above by Fox Land Surveys,Inc.A Record of Survey will be recorded with Ada County upon completion_ END OF DESCRIPTION Prepared by: Timothy I.Fox,PLS Senior Project Manager R�IPROTCCTM20201S20D09 PARADIGNItS20009-0R COMPASS CITIR EAS711I,01I DOCSIDDSCRIPTIO�IS1S2D009-04 ANNE 3-75-7-P 68C S.Progress Ave.,Suite#2I3• Meridian,Idaho 83642•Tel:208-342-7957•Web:hrnh-Ilc.com Equal OppWunity Employer Compass Charter School East Expansion H-2020-0042 Page 727 Item#27. EXHIBIT B ANNEXATION SKETCH 77 a goo zoo SCALE: 1"=200' 1 �RM R N89°15'44"W — 205.90' I� I I 0 LLI � m !� U o �e M n a � o 1 � z z� I I I Point of Beginning 908.47' _ _ — R 10 —S89°15'37"E 2640 62'— — W_FRANKL,IN RQAD B asis of Bearings 15 wW RIW- S89°15'37"E 206,37' t'wD LEGEND ���pta �s r�R G BOUNDARY SECTION RECORD BOUNDARY a 7 RM RIGHT-OF-WAY 70 TIEIDETAIL O N[O] SURVEY MONUMENTS ® CALCULATION POINT Tf�arHy 10 FOX LAND SURVEYS S20009-D4 Sketch.dwg (208)342-7957 Compass Charter School East Expansion H-2020-0042 Page 728 CERTIFICATION OF SUMMARY : William L.M . Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that the summary below is true and complete and upon its publication will provide adequate notice to the public . A I j/7 . J4 William L. M . Nary, City Attorney SUMMARY OF CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO . 204895 An ordinance (H-2020-0042 Compass Charter School East Expansion) for annexation of a parcel of land within the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 10 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho as defined in the map published herewith; establishing and determining the land use zoning classification from RUT to R- 15 (Medium-High Density Residential) zoning district; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; and providing an effective date . A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho . This ordinance shall be effective as of the date of publication of this summary. [Publication to include map as set forth in Exhibit B .] ANNEXATION ORDINANCE — Compass Charter School East Expansion (H 2O20 - 0042) Page 3 of 3 Item#28. (:> E IDIAN*-----, AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ordinance No. 20-1894: An Ordinance (H-2020-0043 - Gem Innovation School) for Annexation of a Parcel of Land Within The Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 28, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,Ada County, Idaho, as Described in Attachment"A" and Annexing Certain Lands and Territory, Situated in Ada County, Idaho, and Adjacent and Contiguous to the Corporate Limits of the City of Meridian as Requested by the City of Meridian; Establishing and Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification of 8.00 Acres of Land from RUT to R-15 (Medium-High Density Residential) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code; Providing That Copies of This Ordinance Shall be Filed with the Ada County Assessor,the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as Required by Law; and Providing for a Summary of the Ordinance; and Providing for a Waiver of the Reading Rules; and Providing an Effective Date Page 729 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-117718 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 KRISTINA LOWRY 09/10/2020 10:51 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 20-1894 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, HOAGLUN, PERREAULT, STRADER AN ORDINANCE (H-2020-0043 — GEM INNOVATION SCHOOL) FOR ANNEXATION OF A PARCEL LAND WITHIN THE SOUTH WEST '/4 OF THE NORTHWEST '/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST '/4 OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE I WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AS DESCRIBED IN ATTACHMENT "A" AND ANNEXING CERTAIN LANDS AND TERRITORY, SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; ESTABLISHING AND DETERMINING THE LAND USE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 8.00 ACRES OF LAND FROM RUT TO R-15 (MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT IN THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR,THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER,AND THE IDAHO STATE TAN COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW;AND PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR ANDTHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OFIDAHO: SECTION 1. That the following described land as evidenced by attached Legal Description herein incorporated by reference as Exhibit "A"are within the corporate limits ofthe City of Meridian, Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request foannexation and re-zoning by the owner of said property, to-wit: Gem Innovation School. SECTION 2. That the above-described real property is hereby annexed and re-zoned from RUT to R-15 (Medium High Density Residential) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code. SECTION 3. That the City has authority pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and zone said property. SECTION 4. That the City has complied with all the noticing requirements pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and re-zone said property. SECTION 5. That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps, and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 6. All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. SECTION 8. The Clerk of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a map prepared in a draftsman manner, including the lands herein rezoned, with the following officials of the County of Ada, State of Idaho, to-wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho. SECTION 9. That pursuant to the affirmative vote of one-half(1/2) plus one (1) of the Members of the full Council,the rule requiring two(2)separate readings by title and one(1)reading in full be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval and publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 8TH day of September , 2020. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO,this 8th day of September 2020. MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON, CITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) ss: County of Ada ) On this 8th day of September 2020,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared ROBERT E.SIMISON and CHRIS JOHNSON known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk,respectively,of the City of Meridian,Idaho,and who executed the within instrument,and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affi)cd my official seal the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO RESIDING AT: Meridian, Idaho MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 3-28-2022 Item#28. EXHIBIT A FOX LAND SURVEYS engineering EXHIBIT ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION GEM PREP MERIDIAN NORTH TAX PARCEL NO.S042832566 A parcel of land within the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 28,Township 4 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,and more particularly described asfollows. COMMENCING at the Southwest Corner of Section 28 monumented by a Found brass cap as described in CP&F Instrument No.2019-017185 at the intersection of N.McDermott Road and W.McMillan Road,thence along the section line, North 01'00'44"East,1315.33 Feet to the 5 1f 16 Corner to Sections 28&29,the southwest comer of the Gem Prep Meridian North parcel and the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing North 01'00'44"East,774.50 feet to the northwest corner of the Gem Prep Meridian North parcel and the existing limits of Meridian City; Thence along the existing limits of Meridian City and The Oaks North preliminary plat boundary,South 89°21'13" East,450.06 feet to the northeast comer of the Gem Prep Meridian North parcel; Thence continuing along the existing limits of Meridian City and The Oaks North preliminary plat boundary, South 01'00'44"West,774.77 feet to the southeast corner of the Gem Prep Meridian North parcel; Thence along the existing limits of Meridian City and the Oakwind prelimi-lary plat boundary,North 89"19'10" West,450.06 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 8.00 acres more or less. Refer to the attached EXHIBIT Survey Map. END OF DESCRIPTION Prepared by: Ronald M.Hodge,PLS 03-43-2020 LAN,0 ;5 r Fpcc s G 0. + �+ A 680 S.Progress Ave.,Suite#2B• Meridian,Idaho 83642 *Tel:208-342-7957• Web:hmh-Ilc.com Eguai Oppartunity Employer Gem Innovation School H-2020-0043 Page 733 Item#28. EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT SURVEY MAP ` r S89° 21' 1 YE 450,06' EXISTING CITY LIMITS 77 P 59 10P } SCALE: 1"=100' a GEM PREP'�7 MERIDIAN NORTH ���N TAX PARCEL Na p S042837566 o cC' S_}j z� C1 LO el' r' a 857 S1116 Comer x N,v3 v3•� J:?[lSTING CITY 11M1T5 Point of Beginning N890 19' 10"VV 450.06' �4 M a 5 pA P(A .� a c�i .� � o � pB�L�MiN�' m � N LEGEND 29 2$ ANNEXATION BOUNDARY — — — SECTION ww PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY 32 33 19 SURVEY MONUMENTS McMillan Road FOX LAND SURVEYS 20009-01 Legal Sketch.do (208) 342-7957 Gem Innovation School H-2020-0043 Page 734 CERTIFICATION OF SUMMARY : William L.M . Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that the summary below is true and complete and upon its publication will provide adequate notice to the public . I& • ,J 777 William L. M. Nary, City Attorney SUMMARY OF CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO . 204894 An ordinance (H-2020-0043 Gem Innovation School) for annexation of a parcel of land within the Southwest '/a of the Northwest %4 of the Southwest V4 of Section 28 , Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho as defined in the map published herewith; establishing and determining the land use zoning classification from RUT to R45 (Medium-High Density Residential) zoning district; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by laws and providing an effective date . A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho . This ordinance shall be effective as of the date of publication of this summary. [Publication to include map as set forth in Exhibit B .] I ANNEXATION ORDINANCE — Gem Innovation School (H 2O20 - 0043) Page 3 of 3 Executive Session 29. Per Idaho Code 74-206A(1)(a) To Deliberate on a labor contract offer or to formulate a counteroffer; and (f) To communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending litigation or controversies not yet being litigated but imminently likely to be litigated.