The URL can be used to link to this page

2020-08-25 Work Session #)49 #/5.#), 7/2+ 3%SSION #¨³¸ #®´¢¨« #§ ¬¡¤±²Ǿ ΒΒ % ²³ "±® £¶ ¸ !µ¤´¤ -¤±¨£¨ Ǿ )£ §® 4´¤²£ ¸Ǿ !´¦´²³ ΑΔǾ ΑΏΑΏ ³ ΓȀΒΏ 0- Minutes 6)245!, -%%4).' ).3425#4)/.3 ,¨¬¨³¤£ ²¤ ³¨¦ ¨² µ ¨« ¡«¤ ³ #¨³¸ ( ««ȁ #®²¨£¤± ©®¨¨¦ ³§¤ ¬¤¤³¨¦ µ¨±³´ ««¸Ȁ https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84770330500 4® ¢ «« ¨Ȁ ΐ-669-900-6833 7¤¡¨ ± )$Ȁ ΗΓΖ ΖΏΒΒ ΏΔΏΏ 2/,, #!,, !44%.$!.#% PRESENT #®´¢¨«¶®¬ *¤²²¨¢ 0¤±±¤ ´«³ #®´¢¨«¬ *®¤ "®±³® #®´¢¨«¬ "± £ (® ¦«´ #®´¢¨«¬ 4±¤¦ "¤±³ #®´¢¨«¶®¬ ,¨¹ 3³± £¤± #®´¢¨«¬ ,´ª¤ # µ¤¤± - ¸®± 2®¡¤±³ %ȁ 3¨¬¨²® !$/04)/. /& !'%.$! - Adopted #/.3%.4 !'%.$! Ȭ!¢³¨® )³¤¬ȭ -®³¨® ³® ¯¯±®µ¤ ¬ £¤ ¡¸ #®´¢¨«¬ "¤±³Ǿ 3¤¢®£¤£ ¡¸ #®´¢¨«¬ (® ¦«´ȁ 6®³¨¦ 9¤ Ȁ #®´¢¨«¶®¬ 0¤±±¤ ´«³Ǿ #®´¢¨«¬ "®±³®Ǿ #®´¢¨«¶®¬ 3³± £¤±Ǿ Council¬ # µ¤¤± 1. !¯¯±®µ¤ -¨´³¤² ®¥ ³§¤ !´¦´²³ ΐΐǾ ΑΏΑΏ #¨³¸ #®´¢¨« 7®±ª 3¤²²¨® 2. !¯¯±®µ¤ -¨´³¤² ®¥ ³§¤ !´¦´²³ ΐΐǾ ΑΏΑΏ #¨³¸ #®´¢¨« 2¤¦´« ± -¤¤³¨¦ 3. &¨ « 0« ³ ¥®± !¤¦¤ %²³ ³¤² .®ȁ Α Ȩ(-2020-ΏΏΗΓȩ ¡¸ "¤¢ª¸ -¢+ ¸Ǿ %¦¨¤¤±¨¦ 3®«´³¨®²Ǿ ,,0Ǿ '¤¤± ««¸ ,®¢ ³¤£ 3®´³§ ®¥ ³§¤ &¨µ¤ -¨«¤ #±¤¤ªǾ % ²³ ®¥ .ȁ -¢$¤±¬®³³ 2£ȁ 4. &¨£¨¦² ®¥ & ¢³Ǿ #®¢«´²¨®² ®¥ , ¶ ¥®± !¯¤· Ȩ(-2020-ΏΏΕΕȩ ¡¸ "±¨¦§³®Ǿ -´±¦®¨³¨®Ǿ ¤³ «ȁǾ '¤¤± ««¸ ,®¢ ³¤£ % ²³ ®¥ 3ȁ -¤±¨£¨ 2£ȁ £ .®±³§ ®¥ %ȁ #®«´¬¡¨ Rd. 5. &¨£¨¦² ®¥ & ¢³Ǿ #®¢«´²¨®² ®¥ , ¶ ¥®± !¯¤· .®±³§¶¤²³ Ȩ(-2020-ΏΏΔΕȩ ¡¸ "±¨¦§³®Ǿ -´±¦®¨³¨®Ǿ ¤³ «ȁǾ ,®¢ ³¤£ ³ ³§¤ .®±³§¶¤²³ #®±¤± ®¥ 3ȁ ,®¢´²³ '±®µ¤ 2£ȁ £ %ȁ , ª¤ ( ¹¤« 2£ȁ 6. &¨£¨¦² ®¥ & ¢³Ǿ #®¢«´²¨®² ®¥ , ¶ ¥®± !¯¤· 3®´³§¤ ²³ Ȩ(-2020-ΏΏΔΖȩ ¡¸ "±¨¦§³®Ǿ -´±¦®¨³¨®Ǿ ¤³ «ȁǾ ,®¢ ³¤£ ³ ³§¤ 3®´³§¤ ²³ #®±¤± ®¥ 3ȁ ,®¢´²³ '±®µ¤ 2£ȁ £ %ȁ , ª¤ ( ¹¤« 2£ȁ 7. &¨£¨¦² ®¥ & ¢³Ǿ #®¢«´²¨®² ®¥ , ¶ ¥®± %¯¨¢ 3³®± ¦¤ & ¢¨«¨³¸ Ȩ(-2020-ΏΏΔΗȩ ¡¸ * ±±® , ¦²³®Ǿ ,®¢ ³¤£ ³ ΐΒΓΔ 7ȁ /µ¤±« £ 2£ȁ 8. &¨£¨¦² ®¥ & ¢³Ǿ #®¢«´²¨®² ®¥ , ¶ ¥®± 0®¨¤¬ 3´¡£¨µ¨²¨® Ȩ(-2020-ΏΏΒΔȩ ¡¸ $ µ¤ %µ ² #®²³±´¢³¨®Ǿ ,®¢ ³¤£ ³ ΒΖΑΖ %ȁ , ª¤ ( ¹¤« 2£ȁ 9. $¤µ¤«®¯¬¤³ !¦±¤¤¬¤³ "¤³¶¤¤ ³§¤ #¨³¸ ®¥ -¤±¨£¨ £ 4ǉ- (®«£¨¦²Ǿ ,,# Ȩ/¶¤±ȝ$¤µ¤«®¯¤±ȩ ¥®± !²¢¤³ 4®¶§®¬¤² 10. $¤µ¤«®¯¬¤³ !¦±¤¤¬¤³ "¤³¶¤¤ ³§¤ #¨³¸ ®¥ -¤±¨£¨ £ *´²³¨ &¨²§¡´± Ȩ/¶¤±ȝ$¤µ¤«®¯¤±ȩ ¥®± ,´¯¨¤ #®µ¤ 11. 0 ±ª² £ 2¤¢±¤ ³¨® $¤¯ ±³¬¤³Ȁ 0¤£¤²³±¨ "±¨£¦¤ #®²³±´¢³¨® !¦±¤¤¬¤³ "¤³¶¤¤ /¯¤ $®®± 2¤³ «² £ ³§¤ #¨³¸ ®¥ -¤±¨£¨ ³® #®¤¢³ 0 ³§¶ ¸ 3¤¦¬¤³² £ 4± µ¤±²¤ 4¤ -¨«¤ #±eek 12. &¨ ¢¤ $¤¯ ±³¬¤³Ȁ !´ « #¨³¸¶¨£¤ &¤¤ 5¯£ ³¤² 13. #¨³¸ ®¥ -¤±¨£¨ &¨ ¢¨ « 2¤¯®±³ - *´«¸ ΑΏΑΏ 14. !0 )µ®¨¢¤² ¥®± 0 ¸¬¤³ - 08-26-ΑΏ - $1,403,173.98 )4%-3 -/6%$ &2/- 4(% #/.3%.4 !'%.$! Ȭ!¢³¨® )³¤¬ȭ $%0!24-%.4 ȝ #/--)33)/. 2%0/243 Ȭ!¢³¨® )³¤¬ȭ 15. - ¸®±͒² /¥¥¨¢¤Ȁ #!2%3 !¢³ -´¨¢¨¯ « 3¬ «« "´²¨¤²² '± ³ 0±®¦± ¬ 16. #®¬¬´¨³¸ $¤µ¤«®¯¬¤³Ȁ 5¯£ ³¤ ® !£ #®´³¸ (¨¦§¶ ¸ $¨²³±¨¢³͒² .®±³§ -¤±¨£¨ "¨¢¸¢«¤ £ 0¤£¤²³±¨ 0« 17. #®¬¬´¨³¸ $¤µ¤«®¯¬¤³Ȁ % ¦«¤ 2® £Ǿ !¬¨³¸ ³® 6¨¢³®±¸ $¤²¨¦ 5¯£ ³¤ 18. Co¬¬´¨³¸ $¤µ¤«®¯¬¤³Ȁ $¨²¢´²²¨® 2¤¦ ±£¨¦ 3¢§®®« $¨²³±¨¢³ $ ³ ¥®± 3³ ¥¥ Reports 6 ¢ ³¤£ ¥±®¬ ³§¤ !¦¤£ ADJOURNMENT ΔȀΓΓ ¯ȁ¬ȁ Jufn!$2/ Page 6 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 2of 25 Page 7 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 3of 25 Page 8 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 4of 25 Page 9 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 5of 25 Page 10 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 6of 25 Page 11 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 7of 25 Page 12 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 8of 25 Page 13 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 9of 25 Page 14 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 10of 25 Page 15 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 11of 25 Page 16 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 12of 25 Page 17 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 13of 25 Page 18 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 14of 25 Page 19 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 15of 25 Page 20 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 16 of 25 Page 21 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 17of 25 Page 22 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 18 of 25 Page 23 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 19 of 25 Page 24 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 20 of 25 Page 25 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 21 of 25 Page 26 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 22 of 25 Page 27 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 23 of 25 Page 28 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 24 of 25 Page 29 Meridian City Council Work Session Jufn!$2/ August 25, 2020 Page 25of 25 E. Page 30 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the August 11, 2020 City Council Work Session Page 3 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page——— Simison: Mr. Nary, are we going to go into Item 20 at this point in time? Nary: Mr. Mayor, it's not necessary this week. We could skip the Executive Session. The short time frame and the longer regular meeting, I think we are good for a week and we will reschedule for next week. Simison: Okay. Then, Council, do I have a motion to adjourn? Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Member Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I move that we adjourn our work session. Perreault: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to adjourn the work session. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Those opposed nay. The ayes have it and we are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:45 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 8 / 25 / 2020 MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK Page 27 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the August 11, 2020 City Council Regular Meeting Page 28 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 11,2020 Page 60 of— (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 8 / 25 / 2020 _ MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK Page 88 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Plat for Aegean Estates No. 2 (H-2020-0084) by Becky McKay, Engineering Solutions, LLP, Generally Located South of the Five Mile Creek, East of N. McDermott Rd. Page 89 Item#3. E IDIAN:--- IDAHO C� PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION Staff Contact:Sonya Allen Meeting Date: August 25, 2020 Topic: Final Plat for Aegean Estates No. 2 (H-2020-0084) by Becky McKay, Engineering Solutions, LLP, Generally Located South of the Five Mile Creek, East of N. McDermott Rd. Information Resources: Click Here for Application Materials Page 90 Item#3. STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 8/25/2020 legend - DATE: Iff Prc jE-1 Lc=fK:ar C-15 TO: Mayor&City Council yyy FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner +2 208-884-5533 � SUBJECT: H-2020-0084 Aegean Estates No. 2 RU T LOCATION: East side of N. McDermott Rd., 1/4 mile south of W. McMillan Rd. (south of the Five Mile Creek),in the NW 1/4 of RUT Section 33,Township 4N.,Range 1 W. —M I I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat consisting of 24 buildable lots and 6 common lots on 8.33 acres of land in the R-4 zoning district. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Shari Stiles, Engineering Solutions,LLP— 1029 N. Rosario St., Ste. 100,Meridian, ID 83642 B. Owner: Endurance Holdings,LLC— 1977 E. Overland Rd.,Meridian, ID 83642 C. Representative: Same as Applicant III. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat(H-2017-0114)in accord with the requirements listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. In order for the proposed final plat to be deemed in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-3C.2,the number of buildable lots cannot increase and the amount of common area cannot decrease. Staff has reviewed the proposed plat and the number of buildable lots has decreased by one(1)and the common open space has increased with the addition of a common lot between Lots 21 and 23,Block 1 for subsurface storm water drainage. Therefore, Pagel Page 91 Item#3. Staff deems the proposed final plat to be in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. IV. DECISION Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions noted in Section VI of this report. V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(dated: 7/31/2017) ' 71 1 I �i� r{•{�^I,�� gi i I�, ,t - ``E P 9 °3 -4 i — .I. 'C I:,�' •• �'' - _ - 'PROP06 ICA—. - F '� ^i sneer scmx.,s •E'��,1 9,1 Nt, r— l ---__------ -----_ _ _._ _.- _ — " icri,Nr•1�d6+6 �•L_=Y�_. aka i'Roe�e�w.,`�mfam F v.Inlr� I RUT I I R;:T Page 92 Item#3. B. Final Plat(dated: 6/11/20) PLAT SH41ANr, k3g_ PAGE S } OF 7HE kW Ifi OF SECTION 33, TAN., R.1V1, 9 V, m=R07AN, AAA COUNTT, IDAHO _ a a_Ir w h1.G 2929 —SIR•■[ n —G6hL tiwa LK ArW swa w Four or hit � i wr,Y Yrw.a.IL I,Ilr.r,nti�5• Fc�r .a -__ �-�k.� I., wx[P w mum wmL w 7 y LVLr44Er+PT aY YR h■.rrr. BOX TIL.KOF, ■ Hm r Id { � i --- i■r PF+I r'.h rt,-•iMNn:.l7WM1 tiL` I!"'� Tyr:•.' _■- aurr �� .. 1, �+t .' ir,•rW°no.•:"`nwr:yc .l .042 q , .! *} ` 'y4tiy k ' -■ �M' n � �wrn..w��vs aayu�.� ILIA OrAws 2m in• t,cr i++aa r •++ A T� ' a - Lf 1' v xr:ws OfLt J/'Nfi—— �•`} Pf _ 6 x F! ��i}• ilmadt�x 'i r•r."4"w••L .VZ +�k Iw-4 r{,..,, I .y�y ■F W � 4! rfrl4'WY IL# ��.ry�a„�`i F a4 I�TiI ` .,,i � '_i' • R -iStiVm'!�71C �+F. ,:iv.:ydr,V.p k A qw7a, 'n,¢ art 1w° w=uwrtu'1i`yu�id 9NuTw . v+ . aa.+w.xu.ra 111m r.r.e..allRxw . oI terror R Via+ m rr1.�l* rY• IRL 7u•IC UAL T#1[ 4 IPC L 4►�Llr I■L'llfx 74�/l4�'-Tx ,�■¢TrOy hT rW n M y1•[�l•Iih h�!Lx:�■Lrlr■i1 I. nr L5 UM 1,r5e f+141 ', .`o"j" '-r.'4=i:1' `w'�r.*:.0 F■1M L nna■ L.Ikf■LCW Ix�iWi �L CGMd J16�` a�,Ei L4sAl1 Aatl-L IQSa RLfF�. :Nr. -hF l,L-WI..[7!1[■,I lyi+W*=•Sl .-rL un +`■ fs •mr' Ji.'l!' Y.,Ir■ i.0 .4 or s+o- -�! FY .r ri.rL ia• .vr a ••+'>'tl..rt.Io.XY••L+�r+wl tat-a.a ltls .I VF �� arcaT ��••.. w .. ++Irfrl■41...•� 4[t'•4 RVu•L• F�11r�L-' - W ••4l LM „2 r+r oti 'YIF T.P Ir+dF TYW —W.I. L • � L sas`. i4 MM 1iAF .Y'!'wT IF1r,ArF ILA P mi, rw+ i► w Ml.+f'+ 1[Nr[1YFM O,•I-rlxl rl[�i�If. K,v W W .aY6, •JrJS ww w IMIM4lt; rlL9r• N m. a, 11+ ♦+af+ w. nM rra aq L- ]Yr Vrt+FT'• 1e XI '/}Wie-• ,.,r•r as• w{r ..I-c�a +•{.r JY .+malti U1 .v•.ati •v --P v vwlr Kiw.�! 15.r y.M' tAfSF .-I.-W. " o. �•„nr. Lr rrati ,,,r' r,V- _wr-L ...r w SFr- ,mow r...r v` "'�� ra ,no7 •.Y .Ir.YaY a 11r nr _.y Ex41xIaXS oroQn-urp wwatc was-„ate R1.av x-.r at yq�avTa..`r,S,nTL�t+utri 1aY a4f W.Fir .IM.rfa Y4+r p auk ' . ',��, r..��.e�Frr �Fa+atr . - T•4f 3 Page 3 Page 93 Item#3. C. Landscape Plan(dated: 06/30/2020) IF PUNS I Iq JA .soc�.ti1'^ f - - r Q :s-rirm J 1 I I �~l`-k�•rf� _� �."__ J ' I;: �a F:if1.. ��a:.,5 i .�. rp .14 LI •. .�� ,�: -fir L ... l4 '• y iI rF!k I a L. rs•rr Page 94 Item#3. VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the approved annexation(Development Agreement-Inst. #2017-116562) and preliminary plat(H-2017-0114)applications approved for this site. 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the subject final plat within two years of the City Engineer's signature on the previous phase final plat; or apply for a time extension,in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by Engineering Solutions,LLP, stamped by Clinton W.Hansen, dated: 6/11/2020,included in Section V.B shall be revised as follows: a. Include the recorded instrument number of the existing ACHD permanent easement in the Legend. b. Note#11: Include Lot and Block numbers that are servient to and contain the ACHD storm water drainage system. c. Note#12: Include the recorded instrument number of the ACHD License Agreement. A copy of the revised plat shall be submitted for City Engineer signature. 5. The landscape plan prepared by Jensen Belts Assoc., dated 06/30/2020, included in Section V.C, is approved as submitted. 6. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer,the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster, Sue Prescott, at 887-1620 for more information. 7. All fencing shall comply with the standards of UDC 11-3A-7C. 8. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions: 1. The street light plan submitted with the construction plans appear to meet city requirements based on a preliminary review. The type 1 streetlights on McDermott need to be placed over McDermott Road, and not the entry road. 2. A Floodplain Development Permit is required. A hydraulic study was completed for The Oaks Subdivision.Phase#1 of this development has no buildings in the floodplain.The permit is needed for site work. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay the Oaks Lift Station and Pressure Sewer Reimbursement Fees in the amount of$265.25 per building lot. The aggregate amount of the reimbursement fees for the entire preliminary plat area must be paid prior to city signatures on the first final plat. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay required to pay the Oaks Lift Station Pump Upgrades Reimbursement fees in the amount of$185.43 per building lot. The aggregate amount of the Page 5 Page 95 Item#3. reimbursement fees for the entire preliminary plat area must be paid prior to city signatures on the first final plat. General Conditions: 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer,an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements,prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy,a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. Page 96 Item#3. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans.This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility,or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed,and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at(208)888- 5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. Page 7 Page 97 Item#3. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 9-1-28.C.1).The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Page 98 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Apex (H-2020-0066) by Brighton, Murgoitio, et al., Generally Located East of S. Meridian Rd. and North of E. Columbia Rd. Page 99 Item#4. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW #... AND DECISION& ORDER , In the Matter of the Request for a Modification to the Existing Development Agreements(H-2015- 0019: Brighton Investments,LLC—Inst.#2016-007072; SCS Brighton,LLC—Inst.#2016-007073; Murgoitio Limited Partnership—Inst.#2016-007074)to Replace the Agreements with One New Agreement Based on the Proposed Development Plan; Rezone of 384.97 acres of Land from the R-4 to the R-8(144.78+ 119.28=264.06 acres),R-15(76.93 acres) and C-C (43.28 acres)Zoning Districts; Preliminary Plat Consisting of 120 Residential Buildable Lots, 11 Commercial Buildable Lots and 14 Common Lots on 41.75 Acres of Land in the C-C and R-15 Zoning Districts; and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 237 Residential Buildable Lots,2 Commercial Buildable Lots,30 Common Lots and 10 Other(Shared Driveway)Lots on 81.63 Acres of Land in the C-C and R-8 Zoning Districts,by Brighton,Murgoitio, et al. Case No(s).H-2020-0066;H-2020-0056; H-2020-0057 For the City Council Hearing Date of: August 11,2020 (Findings on August 25,2020) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11, 2020, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11,2020, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11, 2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11, 2020, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § l l-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR APEX—MDA,RZ H-2020-0066;NORTHWEST—PP H-2020-0056;SOUTHEAST—PP H-2020-0057 - I Page 100 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11,2020, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § I I-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for a modification to the existing Development Agreements,Rezone and Preliminary Plats is hereby approved per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11,2020, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years.Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 11- 6B-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-651 IA. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR APEX-MDA,RZ H-2020-0066;NORTHWEST-PP H-2020-0056;SOUTHEAST-PP H-2020-0057 -2- A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28)days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11,2020 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR APEX-MDA,RZ H-2020-0066;NORTHWEST-PP H-2020-0056;SOUTHEAST-PP H-2020-0057 Item#4. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 25th day of August 2020. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 8-25-2020 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR APEX—MDA,RZ H-2020-0066;NORTHWEST—PP H-2020-0056;SOUTHEAST—PP H-2020-0057 -4 Page 103 EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORTC�WE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 8/11/2020 legend 0 Project Lacfl�ian � TO: Mayor&City Council I f -- .i FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner f 208-884-5533 - -- -- Y - F SUBJECT: H-2020-0066 Apex—MDA,A?RZ ; H-2020-0056 Apex Northwest—PP - - H-2020-0057 Apex Southeast—PP IF - _ 5 (to be marketed as "Pinnacle') - C LOCATION: MDA,A7,,RZ: generally located east of N_a S. Meridian Rd. and north of E. k Columbia Rd., in Sections 31 (S. '/2 and --- , NW '/4) and 32 (SW'/4),Township 3N., _ Range LE; and Sections 5 (NW %4) and 6 (NE '/4), T.2N.,R.1 E. PP(NW):NWC of S. Locust Grove Rd. &E. Lake Hazel Rd., in the SE '/4 of Section 31,T.3N., R.IE PP(SE): SEC of S. Locust Grove Rd. & E. Lake Hazel Rd., in the NW '/4 of Section 5,T.2N.,R.1E. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Modification to existing Development Agreements(H-2015-0019: Brighton Investments, LLC—Inst. #2016- 007072; SCS Brighton,LLC—Inst. #2016-007073; Murgoitio Limited Partnership—Inst. #2016-007074)to replace the agreements with one new agreement based on the proposed development plan; ^rrexatio of nn nn and,Rezone of 384.97 acres of land from the R-4 to the R 2 (0.79 aefe}R-8 (144.78+ 119.28=264.06 acres),R-15 (76.93 acres) and C-C(43.28 acres)zoning districts. Apex Northwest(NW): Preliminary Plat consisting of 120 residential buildable lots, 11 commercial buildable lots and 14 common lots on 41.75 acres of land in the C-C and R-15 zoning districts. Apex Southeast(SE): Preliminary Plat consisting of 237 residential buildable lots,2 commercial buildable lots, 30 common lots and 10 other(shared driveway)lots on 81.63 acres of land in the C-C and R-8 zoning districts. Because right-of-way for E. Lake Hazel Rd. and S. Locust Grove Rd. separates the land proposed to be platted, two separate preliminary plat applications are required to subdivide the property. Page 1 ER II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage ^�."�r384.97(RZ);41.75 (PP-Northwest); 81.63 (PP-Southeast) Existing/Proposed Zoning RUT in Ada County(existing);R-4(Medium Low-Density Residential) Future Land Use Designation Low ensity Residen4ial[LDR(3 or- s/aere) 3944 aeresT Medium Density Residential(MDR—3 to 8 units/acre)(206/-acres); Medium High-Density Residential(21+/-acres); &Mixed Use— Community(MU-C)(120+/-acres) Existing Land Use(s) Agricultural Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family residential(SFR)attached/detached,commercial,office,2 schools(elementary&charter) Lots(#and type;bldg./common) NW: 120 residential buildable/II commercial buildable/14 common SE:237 residential buildable/2 commercial buildable/30 common/10 other NW&SE Combined: 357 SFR residential buildable; 13 commercial buildable;44 common lots;and 10 other lots for shared driveways Phasing Plan(#of phases) 3 (NW); 5 (SE) Number of Residential Units(type NW: 120 units(88 detached/32 attached) of units) SE:237 units(detached) NW&SE Combined: 325 detached&88 attached Density(gross&net) NW: 5.62 units/acre(gross); 11.21 units/acre(net) SE: 3.75 units/acre(gross);6.17 units/acre(net) NW&SE(overall):4.22 units/acre(gross);7.27 units/acre(net) Open Space(acres,total NW: 6.33 acres(15.17%) [%]/buffer/qualified) SE: 10.79 acres(13.22%) NW&SE Combined: 17.12 acres(or 13.88%) Amenities NW: Community center with a clubhouse,community post office,cafe, library/business center;community amphitheater;additional common open space above the minimum required. SE: Community swimming pool,tot lot with play equipment,pathway access to the City's Discovery Park,additional common open space above the minimum required. Physical Features(waterways, The Farr Lateral runs along the north and east boundaries of this site;the hazards,flood plain,hillside) McBirney Lateral crosses the site east/west;and another waterway runs north/south through the site. Neighborhood meeting date;#of 2/5/20;29 attendees W attendees: History(previous approvals) ROS#7394;ROS#7783;H-2015-0019—South Meridian AZ(DA's: Brighton Investments,LLC—Inst.#2016-007072; SCS Brighton,LLC— Inst.#2016-007073;and Murgoitio Limited Partnership—Inst.#2016- 007074) B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Yes(PP,draft);Yes(AZ,RZ) • Requires ACHD Yes(TBD) Commission Action (yes/no) Traffic Impact Study(yes/no) Yes Page 2 Description Details I Page Access NW:2 accesses via S.Locust Grove Rd. &2 accesses via E. Lake Hazel Rd.,both (Arterial/Collectors/State existing arterial streets;and 2 collector streets are proposed Hwy/Local)(Existing and SE: 2 accesses via E.Lake Hazel Rd. &3 accesses via S.Locust Grove Rd.,both Proposed) existing arterial streets; and 3 collector streets are proposed Traffic Level of Service Better than"D"(Acceptable level of service is"E")—Lake Hazel,Locust Grove &Amity Roads Stub Two stub streets are proposed to this site from Prevail Subdivision near the Street/Interconnectivity/Cross northwest corner of the rezone area;no other stub streets exist to this site. Access Stub streets are proposed to adjacent properties for interconnectivity as shown on the preliminary plats. Existing Road Network There are no existing streets within the site,only S.Meridian Rd./SH-69,E.Lake Hazel Rd.and S.Locust Grove Rd.adjacent to the site Existing Arterial Sidewalks/ There are no existing sidewalks or buffers along Meridian Rd./SH-69,Lake Hazel, Buffers or Locust Grove Roads. Proposed Road Capital Improvements Plan{CIP}t Irriegrated Five Year Wark Plan JIFYWP): Improvements ■ Vd9lb RUA 15�rNALlgd Ift the IFYINP io be Wid�M 4 la 5-hWos fllotn Lake Ha,!Et RoAd td A nn ty Road to 2023 * Eagle Road G sanamw 1n i ne IFYWP m be wp]9nw to 5-Panes tram Amp Roadl to vwioiy Road In 2021 + Laka Haza tined is sl fi dulod Hi Ina[l'NOF 10 bo WMenad kb 5-1ames fmrli 1=iJgla Road to Ckwerdele Road iR 2024 + Lake Naze;Road is schad+dl9d in me iFYWP to be wvdemed to 5-mws from Cloveadsle Road to Five btde Road + Tw inlnr5eu mn or Lake Ha291 Rood and Pa* RW rs sclwdulad e1 th9 IF'(WPv to M widened 1a 5-lipnes Qn the north fig,a-Ames on ffu�soot++ae9,3-lone5 on the+Mast leg end 3- lano�s on the east leg and signohzed in 2023 + Thy inkwEK�0 lovusi Grrnye Rpad end 1 KImy Road is whedul in the 1FYVJP to be� constructed as a muiilane rounmbw voth 4-lanes on me narth arnd south legs and 24anes on the east and west kegs in 207 1 * Labe Plarzel Road qs bstud 1n me CPR to be w w1oned to 3-1:anes ham Locust Grove Road to Eagle Road berween 2026 and.Z630 Lake Hzxzel Road Is fisted w the C IP io be widened to 3-;anes from hl ndlan Road ISH-W to Locusl Grave Road balwemn 2026 arrel 2030. A fnity Road is Wed in the CIP to tre widened to 5-vnes tram Locus)Grove#toad to Eagle Reed berween nNi ghd 233t} The Intwsec6on of Lake Hazel Road and Lxmt Orove Rood n listed to the CIP to Ge r-sconstiluctad as a single larto roundaboul widened to 34arres on toe MOP]leg,2•Pi9 05 cin the south,2-lams ees[,and 3-ianas on the wart lQg w1117 a msiwi-md bypass tight turn bypass lane between 20W and 2Q311 + The inimeoiw of Lake Hazel Raerd and SHE is listed en the CIP to be widened 9a 7aenes on the north,saulh,west and ems)legs erid signalized between ME and 20313 • The iiwar5ecfion of Locust GFaya F60dd end Amgyr Rued i5 I15ted iR the CIR to wiAeRetf to 4- hanes an 1ha north leg,�-tines on the south lag,5�Ianos on the west leg:and 9-4ares on the east leg and signalized between 2GX and HMO Additional right-of-way is required to be dedicated for the future expansion of Lake Hazel&Locust Grove Roads with pavement widened to 17' from centerline Fire Service • Distance to Fire Station NW—3.3 miles to Fire Station 94 SE—3.1 miles to Fire Station#4 • Fire Response Time NW&SE-only a small portion falls within 5 minute response time goal • Resource Reliability NW&SE-78%-does not meet target goal of 80%or greater • Risk Identification NW&SE— 1 and 4,current resources would not be adequate to supply service to this project • Accessibility NW&SE-Project meets all required access,road widths and turnarounds if phasing plan is followed Page 3 Item#4. Description Details Page • Special/resource needs NW&SE-Project will require an aerial device;response time is 9 minutes travel time(under ideal conditions)—can meet this need in the required timeframe if needed • Water Supply NW&SE-Requires 1,500 gallons per minute for 2 hours,may be less if buildings are fully sprinklered • Other Resources Police Service • Distance to Police 4.5 miles Station • Police Response Time Average response time in the City is just under 4 minutes—there isn't enough public initiated call data to determine an average response time for this area(goal is 3-5 minutes) • Calls for Service 71 (within a mile of site between 3/15/2019-3/14/2020) • Accessibility No concerns • Specialty/resource needs No additional resources are required at this time. • Crimes 10(within a mile of site between 3/15/2019-3/14/2020) • Crashes 38(within a mile of site between 3/15/2019-3/14/2020) • Other The MPD can provide service if this development is approved as they already serve this area. West Ada School District • Distance(elem,ms,hs) • Capacity of Schools Enr611m nt dr Miles &b v+awu • #of Students Enrolled Marys'MCPherioA Elememvy.. s5s 550 2.0 SlemElemeMary" 677 301) 3.1 vlewrw mWdle school 959 ]QW 4.2 mwntain vkwMilh khmi U19 zM9 34 —thdrin2 the IN21 PChgvl ye4ar Mpry McPhergon's Student uPidtq will mcrcw%6 675r due 16 9hr mn cmi 0255r4"M expansion underway.** —Enrollrmnt at HrFIsddk E'emnentary h c-armiry upped.I;Ments In this dere{aprnent thal are In the HIWAam Mwldefy will he wrtanding Siena Fhtment■r}'una1 eieArstI166i Is h„1h t8 eiimineteauertrawE:ng all.HIWAaJe.*`* • #of Students Anticipated 286 from this Development Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Directly adjacent Services • Sewer Shed South Black Cat Trunk Shed • Estimated Project Sewer See application ERU's • WRRF Declining 13.95 Balance • Project Consistent with Yes WW Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts/Concerns Flow has been committed Water • Distance to Water Directly adjacent Services • Pressure Zone 5 • Estimated Project Water See application ERU's Page 4 Page 107 Item#4. • Water Quality None • Project Consistent with Yes ■ Water Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns Public Worles preference is to see all water utilities in the public right-of-way (ROW),where they can easily be operated and maintained.If the utilities truly cannot be installed in the public right-of-way,then our preference would be for utilities to be located in a dedicated and improved alley. If that cannot be accomplished,the applicant should work with Public Works for further solutions C. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend iul 0 Legend Pra t Laoulkm i fibI ProjEHat LmafiDn y mu-C "AU`R J �hed-I ig vnr' _ Resid nfial Zoning Map Planned Development Map Legend R T 10 Legend 0 Prajent Luc n=an Prcject Lnca5an Ku r R R- , city Llmik I-L Rl RUJT — Planned Flumes RU R-8 UT -R- R- U. -- RUT R-8- 14T R4 _ R R-2 - _ t TA— RUT RUT RUT C� --- Page 5 Page 108 Item#4. III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Brighton,Murgoitio,et al—2929 W.Navigator#400,Meridian,ID 83642 B. Owner: Same as Applicant C. Representative: Michael D. Wardle,Brighton Corporation—2929 W.Navigator#400,Meridian,ID 83642 IV. NOTICING Planning&Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Notification published in 6/19/2020 7/24/2020 newspaper Notification mailed to property owners within 300 feet 6/16/2020 7/21/2020 Applicant posted public hearing notice on site 6/26/2020 7/29/2020 Nextdoor posting 6/16/2020 7/21/2020 V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS(Comprehensive Plan) Land Use: The Future Land Use Map(FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan designates approximately 39 aer-es of the site as I e w Density Residential it DRR ,206+/-acres as Medium Density Residential(MDR); 21+/-acres as Medium High-Density Residential(MHDR); and 120+/-acres as Mixed Use—Community(MU-C). A future school site and City Park is designated in the general area northwest of the Locust Grove/Lake Hazel intersection,north of the MU-C designated area. Another school site is designated on the east side of N. Locust Grove Rd.,north of Lake Hazel Rd.,just north of the subject rezone area. The LPR designa4ion allows feF the development of single family homes oft large a-ad estate lots at gross densities of 3 dwelling units or-less per-aer-e. These areas eften transition between existing rufal r-esidefi4ial and urban properties. Developments need to r-espeet agr-ieultufal heritage and r-eseufees,r-eeegaize view sheds and open spaees, a-ad maintain or-improve the over-all atmosphere of the area. The use of open > , and other-. iate means shetil d o„h.nee the,.,.,,.actor of the area. The MDR designation allows for dwelling units at gross densities of 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The MHDR designation allows for a mix of dwelling types including townhouses,condominiums, and apartments. Residential gross densities should range from 8 to 12 dwelling units per acre. These areas are relatively compact within the context of larger neighborhoods and are typically located around or near mixed use commercial or employment areas to provide convenient access to services and jobs for residents. Developments need to incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place and should also incorporate connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways, attractive landscaping and a project identity. The purpose of the MU-C designation is to allocate areas where community-serving uses and dwellings are seamlessly integrated into the urban fabric. The intent is to integrate a variety of uses, including residential, and to avoid mainly single-use and strip commercial type buildings.Non-residential buildings in these areas Page 6 Page 109 Item#4. have a tendency to be larger than in Mixed Use—Neighborhood(MU-N) areas,but not as large as in Mixed Use—Regional(MU-R) areas. Goods and services in these areas tend to be of the variety that people will mainly travel by car to,but also walk or bike to(up to 3 or 4 miles). Employment opportunities for those living in and around the neighborhood are encouraged. Developments are encouraged to be designed according to the conceptual MU-C plan depicted in Figure 3C in the Comprehensive Plan(see pg. 3-16). In reviewing development applications,the items noted on Pgs. 3-13, 3-15 and 3-16 will be considered(see analysis below). Transportation: ACHD's Master Street Map (MSM)depicts an east/west residential collector street at the half mile between Amity and Lake Hazel Roads; a north/south industrial collector at the half mile between Meridian and Locust Grove Roads north of the half mile between Amity and Lake Hazel Roads,which transitions to a residential collector to the south to Lake Hazel Rd.; a commercial collector around the MU-C designated area at the Locust Grove/Lake Hazel intersection(see dashed lines on map below), and a residential collector along the southern boundary of Apex Southeast.A dual lane roundabout is planned at the Locust Grove/Lake Hazel Rd. intersection.Note:Because a residential collector seems to be more appropriate than an industrial collector street designation in this area,ACHD has included a change to the street classification in the MSM update currently in process. The proposed preliminary plats depict collector streets consistent with the MSM(i.e. E. Crescendo St. & S. Apex Ave. in Apex Northwest; and E. Tower St., S.Vertex Way and E.Via Roberto St. in Apex Southeast). The proposed Master Plan included in Section VIII.A, depicts conceptual street locations in the annexation/rezone area; future preliminary plats should provide collector streets in accord with the MSM as required by ACHD. ti �- r IF 41 -P W-11' J Proposed Development: The Applicant proposes to develop the 41.75 acre property at the northwest corner of Locust Grove and Lake Hazel Roads in the MDR&MU-C designated areas with 120 single-family residential units consisting of 32 attached units and 88 detached units, a future public elementary school, and neighborhood-scale commercial uses as allowed in the C-C zoning district. The 81.63 acre property located at the southeast corner of Locust Grove and Lake Hazel Roads in the MDR and MU-C designated areas is Page 7 Page 110 Item#4. proposed to develop with 237 single-family residential detached units,a charter school, and commercial uses as allowed in the C-C zoning district. A City Park is not required to be provided with this development due to the proximity of Discovery Park at the project's southeast boundary; however,the Park's Dept.would be willing to discuss the potential for a partnership if desired by the Applicant. The following Comprehensive Plan Policies are applicable to this development: • "Encourage a variety of housing types that meet the needs, preferences, and financial capabilities of Meridian's present and future residents."(2.01.02D) A mix of single family attached and detached units(alley-loaded)are proposed in Apex Northwest; only single-family detached units (front and alley-loaded) are proposed in Apex Southeast. • "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and urban services at the time of final approval,and in accord with any adopted levels of service for public facilities and services."(3.03.03F) City water and sewer service is available and can be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. • "Avoid the concentration of any one housing type or lot size in any geographical area;provide for diverse housing types throughout the City."(2.01.01 G) A mix of single family attached and detached units (alley-loaded) are proposed in Apex Northwest; only single-family detached units (front-and alley-loaded) are proposed in Apex Southeast. • "Encourage compatible uses and site design to minimize conflicts and maximize use of land." (3.07.00) The proposed residential uses should be compatible with existing rural residential/agricultural uses in the area. The proposed design of the commercial and residential areas with streets separating the uses should minimize conflicts. • "With new subdivision plats,require the design and construction of pathway connections, easy pedestrian and bicycle access to parks, safe routes to schools,and the incorporation of usable open space with quality amenities." (2.02.01A) Internal pedestrian pathways are proposed through common areas for interconnectivity as well as to the City Park on the east side of Apex Southeast and to perimeter sidewalks. Segments of the City's multi-use pathway system are required in accord with the Pathways Master Plan (see Park's Dept. comments in Section IX.E).Detached sidewalks are proposed along the arterial and collector streets for safe pedestrian access. Usable open space and quality amenities are proposed(see detailed analysis below in Section VIB). • "Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development."(3.03.03A) The proposed development will connect to City water and sewer systems;services are required to be provided to and though this development in accord with current City plans. • "Require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks,water and sewer utilities."(3.03.03G) Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter and sidewalks is required to be provided with development as proposed with the preliminary plats. Page 8 Item#4. • "Encourage the development of high quality, dense residential and mixed use areas near in and around Downtown,near employment, large shopping centers,public open spaces and parks, and along major transportation corridors, as shown on the Future Land Use Map."(2.02.01E) Lake Hazel Rd. lies between the proposed preliminary plats and is classified as a residential mobility arterial that is planned to be a major transportation corridor. A City Park(Discovery Park)abuts the east side of the proposed Apex Southeast subdivision.All four corners of the Lake Hazel/Locust Grove intersection are designated for mixed use (MU-C)development. Development in this area should be high quality and more densely populated at a minimum of 6 units/acre in the MU-C designated area. The gross density of Apex Southeast is only 3.75 units per acre while the density of Apex Northwest is 5.62 units per acre.Staff encourages a higher density due to the location of this site adjacent to a major transportation corridor and City Parr This could be attained through the inclusion of more dense housing types such as more single-family attached units, townhome units and/or multi family apartments. • "Ensure development provides safe routes and access to schools,parks, and other community gathering places."(2.02.01G) Detached sidewalks and pathways are proposed throughout the proposed subdivisions for safe pedestrian access to the future school sites, the City Park and neighborhood commercial/office uses. • "Where feasible, encourage large transmission and pipeline utility corridors to function as transitional buffers,parkland,pathways,and gathering spaces within and adjacent to their right of way."(3.07.01E) A 75 foot wide easement for the Williams Northwest Gas Pipeline crosses this site and is depicted on the Master Plan and preliminary plats as grassy open space area containing a multi-use pathway. No structures are allowed within this easement. • "Require collectors consistent with the ACHD Master Street Map(MSM), generally at/near the mid- mile location within the Area of City Impact."(6.01.03B) Collector streets are proposed on the preliminary plats in accord with the MSM; collector streets will be required to be provided with future preliminary plats in accord with the MSM as required by ACHD. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in all Mixed Use areas, per the Comprehensive Plan(pg.3-13): (Staffs analysis in italics) • "A mixed-use project should include at least three types of land uses. Exceptions may be granted for smaller sites on a case-by-case basis. This land use is not intended for high density residential development alone." The proposed development includes four(4) different land use types—residential(single-family), civic (i.e. amphitheater and community center), commercial and office. • "Where appropriate,higher density and/or multi-family residential development is encouraged for projects with the potential to serve as employment destination centers and when the project is adjacent to US 20/26, SH-55, SH-16 or SH-69." Although a small portion of land proposed to be annexed with this application fronts on SH-69/S. Meridian Rd., it is not proposed to redevelop with this application and is designated for LDR uses. • "Mixed Use areas are typically developed under a master or conceptual plan; during an annexation or rezone request,a development agreement will typically be required for developments with a Mixed Use designation." A Master Plan is proposed with the rezone request for the portion of the property surrounding the Lake Hazel/Locust Grove intersection designated as MU-C(see Section VIII.A).A Development Agreement Page 9 Page 112 Item#4. is required as a provision of the rezone to ensure future development is consistent with the MU-C FL UM designation. • "In developments where multiple commercial and/or office buildings are proposed,the buildings should be arranged to create some form of common,usable area, such as a plaza or green space." The Master Plan for Apex Northwest depicts a community center with a plaza and amphitheater in the commercial portion of the development. The Master Plan for the commercial portion of Apex Southeast nearest the intersection doesn't include a development plan—the future plan should include some form of common, usable area such as a plaza or green space as desired as should other future commercial/office areas in MU-C designated areas where future development is unknown at this time. • "The site plan should depict a transitional use and/or landscaped buffering between commercial and existing low-or medium-density residential development." There are no existing residential uses adjacent to proposed commercial development; therefore, transitional uses and buffering aren't applicable. • "Community-serving facilities such as hospitals,clinics, churches, schools,parks, daycares,civic buildings, or public safety facilities are expected in larger mixed-use developments." A public school is planned in Apex Northwest and a charter school is planned in Apex Southeast per the Master Plan in accord with the FL UM which depicts two school sites in this general area.A community center and amphitheater is proposed in the commercial portion of Apex Northwest. A 27-acre City Park (Discovery Park) abuts the east side of Apex Southeast.A linear open space is planned where the Williams Northwest Gas Pipeline easement is located. • "Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks,plazas,outdoor gathering areas, open space,libraries, and schools are expected; outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count." An outdoor amphitheater, community center with a plaza and charter school is proposed in this development in the MU-C designated area. Discovery Park, a 27-acre regional City park, exists to the east of Apex Southeast and includes picnic shelters,pathways, open play areas,play structures, a splash pad, an off-leash dog park and ballfields. • "Mixed use areas should be centered around spaces that are well-designed public and quasi-public centers of activity. Spaces should be activated and incorporate permanent design elements and amenities that foster a wide variety of interests ranging from leisure to play. These areas should be thoughtfully integrated into the development and further placemaking opportunities considered." The public/quasi-public areas (i.e. community center and amphitheater)proposed in this development are centrally located within the mixed use designated area in Apex Northwest. Discovery Park abuts Apex Southeast and offers a wide variety of activities for area residents. • "All mixed-use projects should be directly accessible to neighborhoods within the section by both vehicles and pedestrians." The proposed mixed use developments will be directly accessible to adjacent neighborhoods within the section through extension of streets and internal pedestrian pathways. • "Alleys and roadways should be used to transition from dissimilar land uses, and between residential densities and housing types." Roadways are proposed as a transition between residential and commercial land uses in both of the proposed subdivisions; and alleys, roadways and common areas are proposed between residential housing types and densities as desired. Page 10 Page 113 Item#4. • "Because of the parcel configuration within Old Town,development is not subject to the Mixed Use standards listed herein." The subject property is not located in Old Town, therefore, this item is not applicable. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in MU-C areas, per the Comprehensive Plan (pgs.3-15 thru 3-16): • "Developments should comply with the general guidelines for development in all Mixed Use areas." See analysis above. • "All developments should have a mix of at least three land use types." The proposed development has a mix of residential, commercial, office and civic uses as desired. • "Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 20%of the development area at gross densities ranging from 6 to 15 units/acre." Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 20%of the overall MU-C designated area at a minimum density of 6 units/acre. Prior to development of the `future development"areas on the Master Plan, a conceptual development plan should be submitted to ensure compliance. • "Non-residential buildings should be proportional to and blend in with adjacent residential buildings." The design, color, construction materials and height of non-residential buildings should be proportional to and blend with adjacent residential buildings as desired. • "Vertically integrated structures are encouraged." No vertically integrated structures are proposed at this time but are encouraged to be included. • "Unless a structure contains a mix of both residential and office, or residential and commercial land uses, a maximum building size should be limited to a 30,000 square-foot building footprint. For community grocery stores,the maximum building size should be limited to a 30,000 square-foot building footprint. For community grocery stores,the maximum building size should be limited to a 60,000 square-foot building footprint. For the development of public school sites,the maximum building size does not apply." The building footprints shown on the Master Plan do not exceed 30,000 square feet;future development should be consistent with this guideline. • "Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks,plazas, outdoor gathering areas, open space,libraries,and schools that comprise a minimum of 5%of the development area are required. Outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count towards this requirement." A community center with a plaza area and amphitheater are proposed in Apex Northwest adjacent to service commercial and office uses; a charter school is proposed in Apex Southeast. These types of spaces and places and uses should be provided in all of the MU-C designated areas in accord with this guideline. Linear open space containing a multi-use pathway is proposed where the Williams Northwest Gas Pipeline easement is located. • Where the development proposes public and quasi-public uses to support the development above the minimum 5%,the developer may be eligible for additional residential densities and/or an increase to the maximum building footprint." Although this is an option, the developer is not requesting an increase in density or in the maximum building footprint allowed. Staff believes the proposed development plan is generally consistent with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density and transportation. Page 11 Page 114 Item#4. VI. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ANALYSIS(UDC A. Development Agreement Modification (MDA): The Applicant proposes to modify the existing Development Agreements(H-2015-0019: Brighton Investments, LLC—Inst. #2016-007072; SCS Brighton, LLC—Inst. #2016-007073; Murgoitio Limited Partnership—Inst. #2016-007074)for this property in order to replace the agreements with one new agreement based on the proposed Master Plan(see Section VIII.A). The existing Development Agreements (DA's)were required with the South Meridian Annexation application in 2015. Because that application was initiated by the City,no development was proposed at that time. A"placeholder"zoning of R-4 was assigned to all of the properties with the requirement that any future development would require an amendment to the DA's to approve any proposed development plan. Existing allowed uses in the County pertaining to the raising or maintaining of livestock and agricultural operations; an exemption to MCC 6-3-10,Firearms,Dischargeable Instruments; and existing agreements for the collection of solid waste were allowed to remain and continue until such time as the properties redeveloped in the future. With the proposed development,these uses are required to cease. The existing DA's require any property or easements needed by the City to provide any sewer or water infrastructure needed in furtherance of the agreement to be provided by the Owner at no cost to the City for the intent of providing for the advancement of sewer and water infrastructure for the benefit of the property,the City and adjacent properties for water mains, sewer mains and trunk lines. Because all of the water and sewer infrastructure commitments have been met and have been constructed,these provisions do not need to be carried over to the new DA. Staff recommends the proposed Master Plan is included in the new DA along with the provisions for future development listed in Section IX.A.1 to ensure compliance with the MU-C FLUM designation. expired.B. Annexation & Zoning(A.Z)a Anne*a4ion of Lot 4, Bleek 1 of Shafer-View Estates Subdivision eensisting of 40.09 aer-es of!and is proposed with an R 2 zoning distr-iet eensistent with the asseeiated FLUM desigaa�ien of LDR. This le be used as open spaee for-a period of not less than 15 years from the r-eeer-ding da4e of the plat;beeause the dwellings,No develepmefi4 is proposed at this time.Annexation is Fequested beea-use the easterly 10 aer-es of the lot is needed for-sewer-and aeeess to the proposed develapmen4; the remainder-of the pr-opefty is not proposed develop as paft of this pr-ejeet. Futtwe develepraea4 is required to eemply with the dimensional sta-adafds of the R 2 zoning distfiet. The Developer-plans to develop the property between the eolleetef stfeet and the adjoining ShafeF View Subdivision with 1 aer-e lots as a tFansition and buffer-to the existing neighbor-heed. Prior-to annexation of the property, a lot division should be approved by Ada County in order-for- the Applieant to only develop the eastern portion of the pr-opeFt-y.- The annexation area is within the Area of City impaet Betmdar-y(AQQ).A legal deser-iption for-the annexation area is ineluded in Seetion VIII.B. The City may r-equir-e a development agreement(DA) in eet��etien with an annexation ptwsttant to 1da Code seetion 67 651!A. Beeause the R 2 distr-iet only allows single family residential detaehed par-ks> nd > Staff does not feel it's neeessafy to r-estfiet development of the pr-epei4y dffettgh a DA Fef Page 12 Page 115 Item#4. C. Rezone(RZ): A rezone of 384.97 acres of land from the R-4 to the ,R-8 (144.78+ 119.28=264.06 acres),R-15 (76.93 acres)and C-C(43.28 acres)zoning districts is proposed. afea on the west side of the f4ffe eelleeter-stfeet depieted on t4e Master-Plan. Beeause this pr-epeAy is designated N4DR on the FLUM,the R 4 or R 8 zoning distriets would t�Tieally be the best zoning choices. annexed with R 2 zoning, Stag r-eeewumeads the adjaeent LDR design4ion is used for-the area proposed be rezoned as allowed in the Comprehensive Plan when deemed appropriate and approved as paft of-a publie hearing with a land development application(see pg. 3 9).No development is proposed at this time. Ftitefe development is FeEleir-ed to eempiywith the dimensional standards of the R 2 zoning distfiet liste in T T�nble112A 4 and-the allowed uses piste''�Table 11 2A 2. The areas proposed to be rezoned to R-8 consisting of a total of 264.06 acres are primarily designated on the FLUM as MDR but some of the area is within the MU-C designated area. The Master Plan does not depict a conceptual development plan for much of the R-8 zoned area except for that to the south of the C- C zoned area in Apex Southeast where single-family detached homes are proposed at a gross density of 3.75 units/acre. Because this area is in close proximity to a major transportation/mobility corridor (E.Lake Hazel Rd.) and a City Park, a higher density in this area is encouraged. The 76.93 acre areas proposed to be rezoned to R-15 lie within areas designated as MDR,MHDR and MU-C on the FLUM. The Master Plan does not include a conceptual development plan for the portion in the MHDR designated area. To ensure future development occurs consistent with the guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan for MHDR designated areas, Staff recommends a DA provision requiring future development to incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place; an alternative housing type such as townhomes and/or multi- family is recommended.Connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways, attractive landscaping and project identity should also be provided.The majority of the remainder of the R-15 area is designated MU-C with a small portion designated MDR.Alley-loaded single-family attached and detached homes are depicted on the Master Plan in the MDR and MU-C designated areas included in the Apex Northwest plat at the northwest corner of Locust Grove/Lake Hazel Roads in accord with the Comprehensive Plan. A concept development plan is not proposed for the remainder of the area proposed to be zoned R-15 north of the commercial area in Apex Northwest, on the south side of Lake Hazel and on the east side of Locust Grove in the MU-C designated area. To ensure these areas develop consistent with the general Mixed Use and MU-C guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan, Staff recommends the DA is amended prior to development of these areas to include a conceptual development plan. Future development should comply with the dimensional standards of the R-15 district listed in UDC Table 11- 2A-7,the allowed uses for the R-15 district listed in UDC Table 11-2A-2, and the general guidelines for Mixed Use developments and specifically MU-C designated areas in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed rezone of 43.28 acres of land to the C-C zoning district is consistent with the associated FLUM designation of MU-C. The area at the northwest corner of Locust Grove and Lake Hazel Roads is proposed to develop with a mix of neighborhood-serving commercial and office uses including a community center and amphitheater; and the area on the south side of Lake Hazel,east of the Locust Grove/Lake Hazel intersection is proposed to develop with a charter school as depicted on the Master Plan. A conceptual development plan is not proposed for the MU-C designated areas at the southwest, southeast and northeast corners of the intersection. To ensure these areas develop consistent with the general Mixed Use and MU-C guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan, Staff recommends the DA is amended prior to development of these areas to include a conceptual development plan consistent with these guidelines. Page 13 Page 116 Item#4. The Murgoitio property(Parcel#S1406110110)located southwest of the E.Lake Hazel/S.Locust Grove Rd.intersection shown as an"NAP"should be included in a future subdivision of the surrounding property(Parcel#S1406110350 or#S1406110015)in order to establish a legal division of land. Or,if a parcel division was approved by Ada County for the current configuration of the property,proof of such should be submitted to the Planning Division with a future subdivision application for the surrounding property. Legal deser-iptionswith asseeiated e*hibit maps of the areas proposed to be rezoned are ifieluded in land thftt is PfiFt Of the annexation request, Staff has requested the Applicant revise the dese4ption to exelude that area; a revised legal description and exhibit map should be submitted pr-i-OF tO the City Couneil hearing. The City may require a development agreement(DA)in conjunction with a rezone pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. Because a new DA is proposed to replace the existing DA's Staff recommends the above recommended DA provisions are included in that agreement. D. Preliminary Plats: Two separate preliminary plats,Apex Northwest and Apex Southeast,are proposed due to ACHD right-of- way(ROW) for Lake Hazel and Locust Grove Roads separating the properties. Because this overall project will be developed as a single integrated project and marketed as such, analysis of both projects is included in this report. Apex Northwest consists of 120 single-family residential buildable lots for the development of 88 detached and 32 attached dwelling units, 11 commercial buildable lots and 14 common lots on 41.75 acres of land in the C-C and R-15 zoning districts. The minimum lot size proposed is 2,863 square feet(s.£)with an average lot size of 3,885 s.f. The gross density proposed is 5.62 units/acre with a net density of 11.21 units/acre. The subdivision is proposed to develop in 3 phases as shown on the Phasing Plan in Section VIII.D. Apex Southeast consists of 237 single-family residential buildable lots,2 commercial buildable lots, 30 common lots and 10 other(shared driveway) lots on 81.63 acres of land in the C-C and R-8 zoning districts. The minimum lot size proposed is 4,840 square feet(s.f.)with an average lot size of 7,058 s.f. The gross density proposed is 3.75 units/acre with a net density of 6.17 units/acre. The subdivision is proposed to develop in three(5)phases as shown on the phasing plan in Section VIII.D. Overall,a total of 357 single-family residential buildable lots, 13 commercial buildable lots,44 common lots and 10 other lots are proposed between the two subdivisions at a gross overall density of 4.22 units/acre and a net overall density of 7.27 units/acre. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There are no existing structures within the boundaries of the proposed plats. The Northwest Williams Gas Pipeline crosses the northeast corners of Apex Northwest(Lot 2,Block 6) and Southeast(Lot 1,Block 9 and Lot 1,Block 14)subdivisions as depicted on the preliminary plats. Development within this area should comply with the Williams Developers' Handbook.No structures should be located within the easement. Proposed Use Analysis: The proposed single-family detached and attached dwellings are listed as a principal permitted use in the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts; and an education institution is listed as a conditional use in the R-8 zoning district per UDC Table 11-2A-2, subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-14. An education institution and professional service(i.e. office) is listed as a principal permitted use in the C-C Page 14 Page117 Item#4. district, subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-14; other allowed uses in the C-C district are listed in UDC Table 11-213-2. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): Development of the subject property is required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district, 11-2A-7 for the R-15 district and 11-213-3 for the C-C district. Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards(UDC 11-6C-3) Development of the subdivision is required to comply with the subdivision design and improvement standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3, including but not limited to streets, alleys, common driveways, easements and block face. The proposed lots in Apex Northwest are consistent with the dimensional standards of the R-15 and C-C zoning districts. However,one of the alleys is not designed so that the entire length is visible from a public street as required by UDC 11-6C-3B.5e;the plat should be revised to comply.Common driveways that comply with the standards in UDC 11-6C-3D may be considered as an alternative. The proposed lots in Apex Southeast are consistent with the dimensional standards of the C-C and R-8 zoning districts. Two(2) alleys and 10 common driveways are proposed in the residential portion of the development that are consistent with the standards in UDC 11-6C-3. Such alleys and common driveways should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-313.5 and 11-6C-3D. A perpetual ingress/egress easement is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder for the common driveways,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. An exhibit should be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks,fencing,building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via the common driveway; if a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street,the driveway should be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway. Address signage should be provided at the public street for homes accessed via common driveways for emergency wayfinding purposes. Access(UDC 11-3A-3) Access is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-3. Apex Northwest: Two(2)public street accesses are proposed via E. Lake Hazel Rd., an arterial street, and two (2)public street accesses are proposed via S. Locust Grove Rd., an arterial street. Collector streets(E. Crescendo St. and S.Apex Ave.)are proposed in accord with the MSM. Apex Southeast: Three(3)public street accesses are proposed via S. Locust Grove Rd., an arterial street, and two(2)public street accesses are proposed via E.Lake Hazel Rd., an arterial street. Collector streets (E. Tower St., S.Vertex Way and E. Via Roberto St.)are proposed in accord with the MSM. Alleys are proposed for access to alley-loaded homes in Apex Northwest and Apex Southeast. Common driveways are proposed for access to certain homes in Apex Southeast. Cross-access easements should be provided between all commercial lots in the subdivisions as set forth in UDC 11-3A-3A.2. Road Improvements: The Applicant has proposed to enter into a Cooperative Development Agreement (CDA)with ACHD to improve Lake Hazel Road abutting the site with(4) 11.5' wide travel lanes, a 19' wide center landscape median,vertical curb, gutter, 8' wide planter strips and 10' wide detached concrete sidewalks within 109' to 120. 5' of right-of-way(ROW)with the first phase of development. The Applicant has proposed to construct dedicated right-turn lanes on Lake Hazel Rd. at Aspiration Ave.,Apex Ave.,Peak Ave. and Vertex Way. Locust Grove Rd. abutting the site is proposed to be improved with(3) 12' wide travel lanes with 6.5' wide bike lanes,vertical curb, gutter, 8' wide planter strips and 5' wide Page 15 Page 118 Item#4. detached concrete sidewalks within 77' of ROW. The specific conditions of approval pertaining to the CDA are included in the ACHD report in Section IX.H. Parking(UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family detached dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. Future development should comply with these standards. Parking for non-residential uses is required per the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-6B.1. Pathways(UDC 11-3A-8): The Pathways Master Plan(PMP)depicts segments of the City's multi-use pathway system in the linear area where the Williams gas pipeline is located and along the east boundary of the rezone area. Pathways should be provided with development in accord with the PMP per the conditions from the Park's Dept. in Section IX.E. All pathways shall be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8 and the Pathways Master Plan.Landscaping shall be provided along either side of the pathway in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-12C.Public pedestrian easements(14-feet wide) should be provided prior to signature by the City Engineer on final plat phases in which pathways are located. Staff recommends two(2) additional micro-path connections are provided in Apex Southeast at the east boundary to Discovery Park. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-1 : The UDC(11-3A-17)requires, at a minimum, detached sidewalks to be provided along arterial and collector streets and attached sidewalk to be provided along local streets. Detached sidewalks are proposed along all internal local and collector streets and along the arterial streets in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-17): Eight-foot wide parkways are proposed adjacent to all streets with detached sidewalks; all parkways are required to be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): A 25-foot wide street buffer is required adjacent to S. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Lake Hazel Rd.,both arterial streets; and a 20-foot wide street buffer is required adjacent to E. Crescendo St., S. Apex Ave., E. Tower St., S.Vertex Way and E. Via Roberto St., all collector streets,landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-313-7C.Alternative Compliance may be requested to UDC 11-3B-7C.2a for street buffers along collector streets to be located in a dedicated buffer rather than in a common lot. Parkways are required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17 and 11-3B- 7C. Landscaping is required along all pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C as discussed above. Common open space is required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3E. Mitigation is required for any existing trees proposed to be removed from the site as set forth in UDC I I- 3B-10.C.5. If the unimproved right-of-way is 10 feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line,the Developer is required to maintain a 10 foot compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of ACHD and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.5.A license agreement for improvements within the right-of-way is required between the property owner and ACHD. Page 16 Page 119 Item#4. Qualified Open Space(UDC 11-3 : A minimum of 10%qualified open space meeting the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B is required to be provided with development of land in residential districts. Based on the residential portion of the Apex Northwest plat(31.52 acres) zoned R-15, a minimum of 3.15 acres of qualified open space is required to be provided. Qualified open space consists of all of the street buffers along collector streets,half of the street buffers along arterial streets,the 8-foot wide parkways between the curb and detached sidewalk, linear open space at least 20' wide and up to 50' wide that has an access at each end, and open grassy areas of at least 50' x 100' in area. Although an open space exhibit was submitted that appears to meet the minimum standards,it includes areas in the C-C zoning district that do not qualify toward the minimum requirements for the subdivision. Staff recommends the exhibit is revised prior to the Council hearing to only depict areas that qualify per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B in order to ensure consistency with this standard.If additional qualified open space is needed,the plat should be revised to comply. Based on the residential area of the Apex Southeast plat(63.18 acres)zoned R-8, a minimum of 6.32 acres of qualified open space is required to be provided. Qualified open space consists of all of the street buffers along collector streets,half of the street buffers along arterial streets,the 8-foot wide parkways between the curb and detached sidewalk, linear open space at least 20' wide and up to 50' wide that has an access at each end, and open grassy areas of at least 50' x 100' in area. Although an open space exhibit was submitted that appears to comply with the minimum standards,it includes areas in the C-C zoning district that do not qualify toward the minimum requirements for the subdivision. Staff recommends the exhibit is revised prior to the Council hearing to only depict areas that qualify per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B to ensure consistency with this standard. If additional qualified open space is needed,the plat should be revised to comply. Qualified Site Amenities(UDC 11-3 . A minimum of one(1) qualified site amenity is required for each 20 acres of land to be developed in residential districts as set forth in UDC 11-3G-3. Based on the area of the residential portion of Apex Northwest(31.52 acres), a minimum of one (1) qualified site amenity is required to be provided. A gazebo is proposed as an amenity in Lot 32,Block 5 as an amenity; Staff recommends tables and benches are also provided as required for a"picnic area" amenity.A community center and amphitheater are also proposed as public amenities in the adjacent commercial portion of the development and a swimming pool is depicted on the Master Plan off-site on the adjacent property to the north; however, these do not qualify as amenities for the residential portion of the development proposed to be platted with this application. Based on the residential area of the Apex Southeast plat(63.18 acres)zoned R-8, a minimum of three(3) qualified site amenities are required to be provided. A swimming pool and children's play equipment are proposed in a central common area and pedestrian pathways(multi-use pathway along E.Lake Hazel Rd. and internal pathways)are proposed as amenities in this development in accord with UDC standards.A detail of the children's play equipment should be submitted with the final plat application. Waterways(UDC 11-3A-dy"j: There are no waterways within the boundary of the preliminary plats. The Farr Lateral runs along the north and east boundaries;the McBirney Lateral crosses the site east/west; and another waterway runs north/south through the annexation and/or rezone areas. Fencing(UDC 11-3A- : All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6C and 11-3A-7. Fencing is proposed as shown on the landscape plan. Page 17 Page 120 Item#4. Six-foot tall wood picket fencing is proposed along end caps at the ends of residential lots adjacent to common areas; and 5-foot tall clear vision metal fencing is proposed adjacent to internal common areas. Storm Drainage: An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction is required to follow Best Management Practice as adopted by the City. Irrigation: Underground,pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided for each and every lot within the development in accord with MCC 9-1,Water Use and Service. Irrigation water will be provided from Boise Project Board of Control. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): The Applicant submitted several perspective building elevations for the proposed single-family homes and for the commercial structures planned to be constructed in this development which are included in Section VIII.G. Homes depicted are a mix of 1-and 2-story units, attached and detached,with building materials consisting of a variety of siding styles and stucco with stone/brick veneer accents.Final design is required to comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual, single-family detached dwellings are exempt from design review standards. Because 2-story home elevations that face arterial and collector streets are highly visible, Staff recommends as a provision of the DA that the rear and/or side of structures on lots that face E.Lake Hazel Rd. and S.Locust Grove Road,arterial streets, and S.Vertex Way,E. Tower St.,E. Crescendo St., S.Apex Ave. and E.Via Roberto St.,collector streets,shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation (e.g.projections,recesses,step-backs, pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street.Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted and approved prior to submittal of any building permit applications for the swimming pool facility and non- residential/commercial structures. A Design Review application is required to be submitted for single- family attached units; one application can be submitted for the overall development if desired. Design review is not required for single-family detached homes. VII. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed MDA,AZ,RZ and PP applications with the requirement of a new Development Agreement with the provisions noted in Section IX.A per the Findings in Section X. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on July 9, 2020. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject MDA, RZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Jon Wardle b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Stacia Morgan; Annette Alonzo representing the Southern Rim Coalition d. Written testimony: Julie Edwards e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s) testimony a. Opposed to the proposed rezone from R-4 to R-15 for the land along Lake Hazel Rd. between Meridian Rd. &Locust Grove Rd. (not against ,gher density around Page 18 Page 121 Item#4. commercial areas);would like to see the zoning of the"future development"areas remain R-4 rather than be rezoned to R-8;belief that farm land and open space should be preserved as much as possible; concern that current school system does not have the capacity to accommodate all of the students from this development;would like a moratorium placed on development that has not already been approved to allow time for the school district and roads to catch up and to have time to re-evaluate how we want to use our dwindling remaining open spaces&farmland. b. Concern pertainingto o capacity of area schools and ability to accommodate more students from this development; c. Would like pathway provided to Black Rock Subdivision for connectivity. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. Concern pertainingto o capacity of area schools and impact of the proposed development on such, b. Supportive of proposed development, community amenities and associated improvements to Locust Grove and Lake Hazel Roads; 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. If revised qualified open space exhibit depicts qualified area less than 10%that the amphitheater in the commercial area be allowed to count toward the requirement through an alternative compliance request to UDC 11-3A-3. 5. Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: a. None Note: The annexation request was pulled from the Commission agenda at the request of the property owner so that it could be re-noticed with a change in zoning from R-2 to R-4. Therefore, it is not moving forward to Council with the MDA, RZ&PP applications. C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on August 11.2020. At the public hearing.the Council moved to approve the subject MDA, RZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Jon Wardle and David Turnbull,Brighton Corporation b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Chris Loveland,Marcella White,Julie Edwards d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: Joe Bon ig orno 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Not in favor of the proposed rezone from the R-4 district and density and lot sizes of the proposed development—preference for larger estate lots(1+acre)and open space. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Phasing of the preliminary plats; b. The uniqueness of the development with community amenities- C. Development is proactive in addressing traffic/infrastructure concerns up front; and, d. Concern about education issue and overcrowding of area schools. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation. a. None Page 19 Page 122 Item#4. VIII. EXHIBITS A. Master Plan (Revised) t 1 a Y 2 iIIAIFE •� LFYRLOP1Bd i_ r. t c AREA EXCLUDED BY tit AUGUST 11,2020 CITY COUNCILAPPROVAL; r SUBIECTT❑FUTURE APPLCATEONS. ti oCKiP+IEM I EI(h/F I NICFiOCr- j -4 II k lulus I z 1� 1 ti ELMEHJ2F.W. _-_--IBM 1 _ 1 N •I 1 1 ! k s 4 _I— V 1 I _ - 1 - I i }I � 1 FJTI 1 / M•T1.tPlr:ri1 X i 1 I C c CONCEFTURL.WEVECTT9 CHANGE _ AUGUST 18,2U20 r Page 20 Page 123 Item#4. B. Annexation Legal Deser-iption & Exhibit MV Page 21 Page 124 Item#4. C. Rezone Legal Description & Exhibit Map r I E_AMITY RD_ � - - + 1 NAP Lu .• R-8 RA - - - :7zzzm- APEX NORTHWEST SUBDIVISION PRE-PLAT IIpuu R-15 IrTm — C-C E.LAKE HAZEL Rt)_ III NAP w J 3 = APEX SOUTHEAST SUBDIVISION PRE-PLAT 0 1000 2000 3000 km Plan Scale:1'=1000' E N G I N E E R I M G 9M NEST snare STRM eas[inAH0Ea7Ls PHONE 321WI E39E939 APE(SU B DI VISI O N k njilp— MERIDIAN,IDAHO DATE: AUGUSTZMD PRUI ECT: 21HX7 SHEET_ OVERALL PROJECT VICINITY MAP 1 OF 1 Page 22 Page 125 Item#4. km 9233 WEST STATE STREET I BOISE,ID 837'14 1 208.639,6939 1 FAX 208.639.5930 April 2,2020 Project No.2M17 Exhibit A Legal Description for Rezone to R-8-North Apex Subdivision A portion of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4,a portion of the Southeast 1/4 and a portion of the Northeast 114 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 31,Township 3 North, Range 1 East, B.M., City of Merldian,Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Center of said Section 31,thence following the northerly line of said Southeast 1/4 of Section 31, N89"57'56"E a distance of 2,601-37 feet to a brass cap marking the East 114 corner of said Section 31; Thence leaving said northerly line and following the easterly line of said Southeast 1/4,500"32'22NE a distance of 1,419.94 feet; Thence leaving said easterly Iiae,N89°42'21"W a distance of 1,423.17 feet; Thence 500°16'52"W a distance of SMOG feet; Thence NS9°42'2VW a distance of 1,1.98-50 feet to the westerly line of said Southeast 1/4; Thence following said westerly line, N00°16'52"E a distance of 682.44 feet to the Center-South 1f 15 corner of said Section 31; Thence leaving said westerly line,SS9-52'0S"E a distance of 62.50 feet; Thence NOW 16'52"E a distance of 895.00 feet; Thence 199.42 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 280M feet, a delta angle of 40"48'25",a chord bearing of N20°07`2O"W and a chord distance of 195.23 feet; Thence N40"31'33"W a distance of 241-33 feet; Thence 198.79 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 230.00 feet, a delta angle of 49'31'13", a chord bearing of N65"17'09"W and a chord distance of 192.66 feet to the southerly tine of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 31; Thence fallowing said southerly line,S89'57'15"W a distance of 980.26 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Center-West 1/16 corner of saGd Section 31; Thence Leaving said southerly line a nd fo Vow!ng the westerly line of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4, NOO"25'36"E a distance of 1,558.66 feet; Thence leaving said westerly line, N81°55'55"E a distance of 518.76 feet; Thence 56.28 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 58.00 feet,a delta angle of 55"35'50",a chord bearing of 520°49'52"E and a chord distance of 54.10 fleet; Thence 546°52M"E a distance of 45.40 feet; Thence 554'18'10"E a distance of 180.18 feet; Thence 16 1.54 feet along the arc of a circular cu rve to the left,said curve having a radius of 588.00 feet, a delta angle of 15"44'26",a chord bearing of 562°10'23"E and a chord distance of 161.03 feet; Thence S70°02036"E a distance of 107-80feet; Thence S19'57'24"W a distance of 12.00 feet; Thence 570°02'36"E a distance of 14.45 feet; Thence SEW58'05"l;a distance of 207.13 feet; Thence S65a32'50"E a distance of 188.57 feet to the easterly line of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4; Page 23 Page 126 Item#4. Thence following said easterly fine,50O°3a'17"W a distance of 1,140.13 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 144.79 acres, more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit 9 and by this reference is hereby made a part of, NIL Is 12459 4,17 L. BN rr. � SSr�"C�'�* HUM I/4 MWER s� N% 31�xR6G38'17� � vV ZCa 9RhBS UP ru c °S Y Er3T 1!1 'O0"40 Ey # SECTION 31 w FQNT OF BEG!hNNG § p :3 6/6+INCH RM4R Ili W 3/'� CEP cc E:ERTpt OF SEC170W 31 9►SI or 9EJYi21kv Qu y{ QN.29' NW57'5Er 2ICL 601.37 ST75r FAO#o2 31 m Q r �ALWIFUM CAP +� *UT 1/d CNNE C 5whok 11 N4jr31'53-w 'G 20.33' Rezone Area: 144-78t AC- All pF 5113124�454a&punbn of R7&Z422CWJ r W S113143720DS1181438400 SL511314172SI � �s4 Current Zoniri -RUT&R'4 # . I PropoSLd Zoning:R-8 g h.1`e. wkex� #R116.'1 COST - — — — — — — F — — — — — — — — SHEET: 6�9-NCH i R 1 +✓8��231'4 1#g3 t7' l F C-s 1/10 CORNER f Z n iy OF 9ECRIN 31 e g m I r�EP+Y�1`rr 101.156' ` I /y ��/��yy,��II n�ya�yy V 3013 6011 I V G`4FGYfGM` 7UhT i 'i.�tik.i> 4197 YR}I 71011 lr+Lk I SCALE- I'�hEQQ' '11 m!1 16, Page 24 Page 127 Item#4. kin 9233 WEST STATE STREET I BOISE,ID 83714 I 208,639,b934 I PAX 208-M-6930 APr[I Z,2020 Project No-2"17 UhlbitA Legal 17esoription fur Rezone to R$-South ApexSubdlwi$1an A parcel of land situated in a portion of the West 1f 2 of the Fforthwe5t 1/4 of Section 5 and a portiori of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 5,Township 2 North, Range 1 East 0.M-,City Qf Meridian, Ada County,Idaho and heing more particularly described as foilows: Commen Ceing at a brass cap rnaricl ng the co rner cam more to Sections 5 anti 6,Township 2 No rth,Ra nge 1 East and Sectons 31 artd 32,Townsh ip 3 North, Range 1 Ea st which bears S89"42'2I'E a dicta nce of 2,640.00 feet from a 5f8-Inch rebar marking the#forth 1f4 corner of said Section 6,thence following the easterly line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Se€tian 6,S00$04'351E a distance 4661-39 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence teaving said easterly lin€,N89°53`42"€a diSta nCe of 966.03 Feet; Thence W1'51'13"E a distance of 547-17 feet W the easterly Ilne of said West 1{2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5; Thence following said easterly line.SO4'01'43°E a distanceof,1,423.96feel to the Center-Wiest 1/16 earner of said Section 5, Thence leaving said easterly line and followng the southerly line of Bald Vilest 1f 2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5,N89°52'3$"W a KWtOACe Of 1r329.65 fee tto a bras tap marking the West 1}4€ornerof said Section 5(East 1/4 corner of saF1 Section 6); Thence laavlrog said southerly line of the West 1 f2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5 a rid fallowing the southerly line of said East 112 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 6,N89°22'50"W a distance of 1304-25 feet; Thence leaving said southerly Liner N00`43'55`W a distance Of 111-26 feet; The nre N00°2.t}'23`W a distance of5 9.25 feet; Thence N97134'26"tin+a distance of 1149 feet to the westerly line of said East 1{3 of the Northeast T 4 of Section 6; The nee following said westerly Ene,Pt00'02'46"W a distance of 66,73 feet to the westerly rfgltt-cf-way line of the Rawson Cana]; Thence leaving said westerly lm-a and followl rig said westerly right-of-way Iine the followingcourses: 1, N78"25'55"E a distance of 161.21 Feet; 2, N54'55'2WE a distance of 74,17 feet; 3. N31°51'12"E a distance of 92.01 feet 4, N10'2S'1D"Ea distance of381,33feeti 5- N05°26'52oW a distance of 105,26 feet; 6- N18'56'2W)JV a distance of 287.65 feet; 7. N32'CG'38"W a distance of 91.83 feet; B. N61432'57"W a distance of 104.61 feet; 9- N74'59'05"Yy a dlstanoe of 44M feet,- Thence Leaving said westerly right-of-way line, NOO°02'06"1N a distance of 396.78 feet; ENGiNEEl{S I SURVEYORS PLANNERS Page 25 Page 128 Item#4. Thence SB9°42'20"E a distance ckf 796.96 feet; Thence 504*&4'35"r a dlstarice of 252-00feet; Thence 589'42'20"E a distance DI`473.4i7 feet to the easterly line of said East V2 of the Northeast V4 of Section 45{westerly I ine of said WoGt 1/2 of the Northwest 1{4 of 5ectia n 5}; Thence following sold easterly nine(and said westerly line), N0G'44'35'W a dlstanceof$4.63 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Sald parcel contains a total of 119.28 acres,more pr less. Attached hereto is Exhlblt 6 and by this refereow is hereby made a part of. 12459 •2,0 3,0 PAGE 2 Page 26 Page 129 Item#4. BASIS OF BEARING ri 2 31 9'42'21"E 2640.00' E 1AKE HAZEL RD 31 32 T.3N.. RA E. n 6 5 T.ZN., R.1 E. 5 8-INCH REBAR POINT OF COMMENCEMENT I s/e-INCH REUAR BRASS CAP WEST 1/16 CORNER T -c -0 -c NORTH 1/4 CORNER NW CORNER SECTION 5 -2 SECTION 5 AND stCncN 6 NE CORNER SECTION 6 �' SECTION 32 a x� O iv t�7 a m c � `n I POINT OF S89'42'20"E 796.96' a 6EGINNING O , N89'53'42"E 965.03' 4- V) o 589'42'20"E L11 L9 473.40' LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE QXj 3 (8 CL 1= a Rezone Area: 119.28t AC. Ll N8734'26"W 13.49 m < z u N15'56'20"W Portion of 51406110015, 2B7.65' L2 NO'02'08"W 66.73 ± c All of 51406110350 and m o a Portion of S1405212410 L3 N78'25'55"E 161.21 0 s � � Current Zoning:R-4 L4 N54TM'20"E 74.17 N LU Proposed Zoning:R-8 c _ L5 N31'51'12"E 92.01 LU iO ^ Iti L6 0'28'52V 106.26 Z N o5v M L7 N32'08'38'W 91.a3 W� L8 N61'32'57"W 104.61 �' MpRCH39I9 L4 h N T�I r PaaEt7. 20-D17 Ln 1�' o Ln L9 N74'59'05"W 44.02 SHEEP Ll o 0 LIG SO'04'35"E 252.00 1 OF 1 u' L1 i N704'35"W 84.63 NOO'20'23-W 549.25' L12 N59'22'50"W 17.75 I D 20❑ 4�❑ Boo BRASS CAP i W 1/4 CORNER SECTION 5 1/2-INCH REBAR SCALE: 1"= 00' E 1/4 CORNER SECTION 6 EEMMEIon C-E 1/16 CORNER N0O'43'55"W C-W 1/16 CORNER ENGWEEkS.SukVEYORS_PIANNERS SECTION 6 111.26' SECION 9F33 WE5TSTATESrREEf N89'22'50"14 1304,25' 6 5 N89'52'38"W 1329.65' 9043E IQ4HO B3714 L12 RnxH Im91$c�9 63�039 Page 27 Page 130 Item#4. km 9233 WEST STATE STREET I BDISE,ID 83714 1 208.639.6939 l FAX 20&639.6930 April 29,2020 Project No,20-017 Exhibit A Legal Description for Rezone to R-15 Apex 5ubdivi5ion A parcel of land situated in a portion of the South 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 31 and a portion of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32,Township 3 North,Range 1 East,B.M.,and a portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 6,Township 2 North, Range 1 East B.M.,al I situated in the City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho anti heing more particularly described as follows- BEGINNING at a 5/8-Inch rebar marking the corner common to Section 31,Township 3 North,Range 1 East,and Section 6,Township 2 North,Range 1 East,which bears N89°42'21"E a distance of 2,640.00 feet from a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Southeast 1/4 corner of said Section 31; Thence following the westerly line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 31,N00°16'52"E a distance of 660.00 feet; Thence leaving said westerly line,589°42'21"E a distance of 1,198.50 fleet; Thence N40"15'52"E a distance of G20.00 feet; Thence 589°42'21"E a distance of 1,971.82 feet to the easterly boundary of the Farr Lateral; Thence following said easterly boundary the following courses: 1. 64.48 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve hawing a radius of 110.00 feet,a delta angle of 33°35'03",a chard hearing of 505°50'15"W and a chord distance of 63.55 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 2. 51ti`57'45"E a distance of 410.17 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 3. 114.95 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 140.00 feet, a delta angie of 47"02'41",a chord bearing of S34*29'08"E and a chord distance of 111.75 feet to a 1/7-inch rebar, 4. S58'00'31"E a distance of 219.85 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 5. S69`55'45"E a distance of 503.32 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar on the easterly line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32; Thence following said easterly line,S00'10'02"E a distance of 430.90 feet to the southerly line of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32; Thence following said southerly line,N89'57'46"W a distance of 641.22 feet; Thence N00°06'18"W a distance of 124.99 feet; Thence N47°51'44"W a distance of 797.36 feet; Thence N89°42'21"W a distance of 775.42 feet; Thence 500°16'52"W a distance of 1,154.01 feet; Thence N89°42'2WW a distance of 587.77 feet; Thence N00°02'06"W a distance of 494.01 feet to the southerly line of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 31; Thence following said southerly line,NS9°42'2VW a distance of 10370,00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Page 28 Page 131 Item#4. Said parcel contains a total of 76.93 acres, more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is hereby Trade a part of. OF L >13 .7-41.so LEGEND FOUND BRASS CAP � � o/6-wcri Ri±o,uh A CALLI RJtrEIs FGW Ln y, REZONE EGLWAff . JL 2 0 500 1000 1500 '� a E7t1S11NG R%RC 1 Lw1E cc -- — =SECTION LINE Plan Seale.1"+500' 91 '' o CURVE TALE NAY€ RADLG LEWNWM DELI Ct+E}pDBAG tE cTsa Cu 3 C2 14¢_Ot}r 11493' �7'�2'A1` 3�F`2 'G9"E 111-3 ' m C $W42'21'E 197TM X I 13 3 i1 a z Reams Area_M.921 Ar. * z parkloe$7,131�36�00,51733i#7 C O 511.3141775 L.51 133335EM.A SI&MIM15 CL✓rtnk 29f'"q'le-1 .ten Lr O $ fapoudZonir IF15 ;n SALTi2'31� i 5{I' 5SOd 3l'E 775.42' 219 85' NW-42'211R SS rw.t7tk Cr +rwmy�oc_ La I. } 2:r�o�o�ol}'se�r ONSIS OF BEARING z b N99'42'21'W 13711AM' ,ram+ T.7N.. R.IE. 5 .5. A-W E4I. €LAKE HAZEL All POR11 OF L3EGBINING 3 80SS 1y1P km $E ccgm] 5/9-INCH RtSAR S RICH I R o a SECTION 31 -WEST 1/15 CORNER SOUTH 1/4 CUfi?IER SECTION 3' v SECTUH 5 AND 32 ik9&EEar SuMYDAi t%�4R• 59�,�' YtlYfeit i iAe Siaa:r I� ��nwrG8575� tAr E'+W alhava? Page 29 Page 132 Item#4. km 9233 WEST 5TA7E STREET I 8015E,Ip 83714 1 208,639.6939 1 FAX 208.639.6930 April 29,2020 Project No,20-017 Exhibit A Legal Description for Rezone to C-C Apex Subdivision A parcel of land situated in a portion of the southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 31,a portion of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32,Township 3 North, Range 1 East,13-K,and a portion of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5,and a portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 6, Township 2 North,Range 2 East S.M.,all situated in the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a brass cap marking the Northwest corner of Section 5, Township 2 North,Range 1 East, which hears N89'57'04"W a distance of 1,331.87 feet from a found 5/8-inch rebar marking the West 1/16 corner of said Sections 5 and 32; Thence following the northerly line of said Northwest 1/4,S89°57'04"E a distance of 690,66 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing along said northerly line,S89"57'04"E a distance of 541,21 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar marking the west 1116 corner of said Sections 5 and 32; Thence leaving said northerly line and following the easterly line of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 5,S00°01'43"E a distance of 250.92 feet to a point; Thence leaving said easterly line,S41"51'13"W a distance of 547,17 feet to a point; Thence S89°53'42"W a distance of 966.03 feet to a point on the westerly line of said Northwest 1/4; Thence following said westerly line,N00*04'35"W a distance of 167.37 feet to a point; Thence leaving said westerly line,N89°42'20"W a distance of 682.5E feet to a{point; Thence N00"16'52"E a distance of 1,154.01 feet to a point; Thence S89"42'21"E a distance of 775.42 feet to a paint; Thence S47*51'44"E a distance of 797.36 feet to a point; Thence S00°06'18"E a distance of 125.13 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 43.28 acres,more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is hereby made a part of. 12 597-0 Page 30 Page 133 Item#4. BRASS CAP 43 EA!r t/4 CGRNER ode =W.CTION 31 3� 31 � - e� � S&W4f21-E 775-4 d � q 0 3U 6o4 goo U � o c 'r+"}. Plan$Celle;1"=36 O C g ' 4 �a POINT OF COMMENCEMENT $ SJ$ REBAR � X m W f411ND BRASS CAP i �pQpp'i� YYVf 1/14 CORNER ui m T FE' CORNER 59C110QN 31 12S,1S' SECTIONS S & 32 Q 31 — $69'42'21�E 31 3 T-RLLf g. 647 -6Q' _ SB9'57'44'E 841.21` wI 6 m 254C1.D ' T,2N„ RJE 1331,87 L u E LA4E HAZEL RO $ PONT 15F peal»mmO 0AS15 OF BEARING *6 Z 258.92' w Rezoe Area:43.28±AC rn� Ponian o1 Sii]i41725f.StL3232SOM. Si4OS223MOD&SiaOfii�Wi ,� 4 [uncut AnhM:k4 I Q Peobc"i�!Milt.L-L nary h'�i�'i26 Ne4 'x014 92.58' NOi!0�'3s YI k SHEET: �xn* 157,37' 59B'6S'42� 06�.0.3' � LCCE 'b I FOUND URASS CAP ID B/B-LNCH RE&W I 1 A WCIJ ATO PQINT RE.ZONE BOJACARY #YGwttfS.irbeHpo. iMwu!r ff Q EV571NC PAICEL LINE M'mq"um — — — —SE1;MN LIN>: iMaf Page 31 Page 134 .wY �I 3i �-r - Item#4. Northwest: APEX NORTHWEST SUBDIVOON PRELIMINARY PLAT A PORT1011QF 7HESDJFH IP43F THESIDUTHEAST V4AN0 HORTFffAT L14 OF THE !Oufi4CFSt 1f14F x0xm]LT rM!,M 3N0PTPL PIF+GC 1 r,*'?. {I7Y4F IAERIDPIL 19A COUNTY,IOMIO I KZL— F- wwa+w� Gi_ r - A �1 =1; Litz. I 3si X= ib 941 �:�- Fm_ ,, -11 Page 33 Page 136 Item#4. . k 3 y }{i ---- {•i 1�.�..� .-�� 1+ �' s � Imo_ — r y � ? PEW Y Y-y- k r �JG i �!-1 8 1 � _ Y A J L t T Q a • � � �E :�� I ' i �i�� ft�YY�Y4� f +�q L � y Page 34 Page 137 Item#4. Phasing Plan: APEX Northwest Phasing ConceprWf/Subject to Chan • 1 ID- - � 1 - ..,.+.+ ....�. : 1 —— F b I� l Southeast: APEX 5OLItHEA#t9UBMI51QH PRELIMINARY PLA7 — x�ro�u.exo srruxrte ix ire ncsr ir:a ixr.rwusrxo i va o gr•usrt s. v ra�r�+gku;�rr��s!ar.cvw saxau{xue miixir,i¢srn �S' _iL •K E k . .it —Sri- �• —. _ _ Page 35 Page 138 Eil �j I f *'Ol i h I I I � I � i .•�r I 4.r f A7. r�l! s it A t a 4 r�r � $ � •czTwaareJ-vr�=�� I i t g i �5 Y� I � •1lJJ.::J •rJ 8 Page 36 Page 139 Item#4. AE ��. •--� � � .rug �� i _ _A i 2 1 a 4 4,i 2.lT so 2.12. � ��oaea9m�nc�waG. IWL .. I I I � � '•� - �. � � ,F2 i Page 37 Page 140 Item#4. Phasing Plan: APEX Southeast Phasing E.LARL I IAZL_RD. muMCkCMLIC{I COMMMaAL*C} D f AYFq TY �4 L Q 1 / � o ='- —1— —►� �' (-3) ID J Q d 4 a w — p ao E ;:� !5?+R:ST. � RESI�F7JilAL iR9il Gy E.STAGE Si. C, r3 ® ® f➢ Q1 ® ® ® Ci F3 E SPIRE ST: o 0 o s r t E 1NM.ErMMI fIUN'� l7 49 E.AMaJTION ST. 0 o � F.AMM..ST.. t-� E APWCE ST. p 9 — � fiS hl I 0 C7 � r � g ® O 0 g E b] 9 � E.AbVENTURf ST. e v Page 38 Page 141 Item#4. E. Landscape Plan(date: 4/30/2020) Northwest: yj .C ` E�nera9tRimame— --— — - _ � "leer •r.�s�yea"�sris� �� s - tt3arars a -xs. 0 PPF2,4 PPC 3,4 dy -nW 29 flu I aeoy,wa�n�m+a wo n.Axo rc-.a �. _ I Q14}7kL1 f4L'tl h�I.� 41IY.kT171CQ11 dCYi7 InwL7EeafESITEw.a�l ,o,w';�� a;� • I a:r •• •I IL�" 4E�.4]If+MRYT�AdMYU.I — HE�L.I.a ISW.4 k 7ie� 41 Page 39 Page 142 Item#4. ----- ---- — ------------ ------ IMIIMAP VlAh �E_ hNFCH LI7J! S:"u;k�w"l.? _ WITCH UIE-SEE 5NkE7 ak3,P ............... .................. ......ii...... ................. . .- r• 7tl ifs is i ''LF-13i-'� 't M1y F, . A0-. Page 40 Page 143 Item#4. Southeast: n�Ea�clu.nlunocp�� it � � �� -�'�� _� �---—�— -• - - - , �` r IL Qf�1�ALE711l6 P u!L + a: i PPL3.D PPL4.0 PP14.4 k� _T _y.�'- } ! � � ��_ �•�+Eov en l yam. S Y � o I r t}t - - rullr LY.. -.'!—.� ;ice _ •- -t S.,_'. __' mEa7.maeQEcxs nr. +� I I iE¢�YEIQEIIQ LJWCIiLAPCSffCRAN Ran EP 3QV fr^ iEL�.i__ r3_ Wes. '� - =mkt �-•�� — i#LS�Gl00YFR3 Page 41 Page 144 Item#4. � u i �.r I '�I I {ti°04f:3:##{io�i:ic{{off ---------YY'I I1},hSC/lf-0LadF IAAT4iM SAF SHEUE730 �/l� lrlr:+6'1 91WRW1 YapMIFEdir wwww wv..ilk.w_ro -, MAI I'll I IEJ-'IIE itIM t 92A ----- ____.___I: - ----- i ----- ___ ..�.. ��....� ...� �_ C§ W-.A- R�l- � .��.... Y .�.... • l�hI HCJIPk PLhN =��1�-�E3FEEfP119A ' x57d Page 42 Page 145 WAR H LGWI-SEE�Hlrr PP3.0 P!, F, j -7Y X- R- ...... . ....... . 3 1 .... ... LMVDSCMEPLAN Page 43 F. Qualified Open Space Exhibit(dated: Alareh May 2020) - REVISED Northwest: APEX NORTHWEST SUBDIVISION OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT U ... . .......- r---------------- - T AM hURTHWM 5UBWRDN Karm", krm I OF I Page 44 Item#4. Southeast: J + r x• - I� p �i 4 g �; - n'� - is •rr :erl ^ - tT _ _ I rm I d +� rm Ln rl y Re a x• y I c •- � � 1!s y: � IL V t 1 9 F z 5' m � m _ x - r - E Page 45 Page 148 G. Conceptual Building Elevations/Renderings YA Meh 445'Arr7e.�ic� .7iia'y 0 1 rim, Apex NW Aesl�enrJ� Alley iL )41 +. Apell�J W Rafl$M�4-Aaw AIYlK Apell SF'A esAdevlhaJ rartvrnhdnal ,r A4�e3f��S1dGI1tIP1-�ORlY�210YIP1 T 1',�{F Y � � Page • . 46 aFe�FFBrildenuol rar'enrianad leve,rSfHrefdentleJ-Cvmeziticrmt - ,-.r":�''•-: �.--i : SOMME IIIlku Ilk ,q�Nw commeic+d r�crx hf W ComrnerrJv� r. fix NW rammaxial .. Page 47 J 31'. • '$.y4' Y �� fr� � � �� yti ' ■��y� �'. 7 t�+� ti Page , i- 48 Item#4. H. Legal Description&Exhibit Map of Property Subject to New Development Agreement &am 9233 WEST 5fATE STREET I BOISE,ID 83714 1 208.639.6939 J FAk 208,639,6930 August 18,2020 Apex Subdivision Project No.2"17 Legal Description Exhibit A Legal Description for Apex subdivision A parcel of land situated in a portion of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4,all of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 31 and a portion of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32,Township 3 North,Range 1 East, B.M.,all of West 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 Section 5 and a portion of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 6,Township 2 North, Range 1 East 8-M.,all situated in the City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8-inch rebar markingthe Center 1/4 Section 31,Township 3 North,Range 1 East, B.M.,thence following the southerly line o€the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 31, S89°57'15"W a distance of 1,318.94 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Center-West 1/16 corner of said Section 31; Thence leaving said southerly line and following the westerly line of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4, N00"25'36"E a distance of 1,558.65 feet to a point; Thence leaving said westerly line,N81"55'55"E a distance of 518.76 feet to a point; Thence 56.28 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 58,00 feet,a delta angle of 55°35'50",a chord bearing of S20'49'52"E and a chord distance of 54.10 feet to a point; Thence 546°52'43"E a distance of 45.40 feet to a point; Thence 554°18'10"E a distance of 180.18 feet to a point; Thence 161.54 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 558,00 feet, a delta angle of 15'44'26",a chord bearing of$62°10'23"E and a chord distance of 161.03 feet to a point; Thence 570°02'36"E a distance of 107.90 feet to a point; Thence 519"57'24"W a distance of 12.00 feet to a point; Thence S70"02'36"E a distance of 14.45 feet to a point; Thence 551'58'05"E a distance of 207.13 feet to a point; Thence 555'32'50"E a distance of 188.57 feet to a point on the easterly line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 said Section 31; Thence following said easterly line,500"38'17"W a distance of 1,14D.13 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of43.744 acres,more or less. TOGETHER WITH: BEGINNING at 5/8-inch rebar marking the Center 1/4 Section 31,Township 3 North,Range 1 East,B.M., thence following the northerly line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 31, N89'57'56"E a distance of 2,601.37 feet to a brass cap marking the East 1/4 corner of said Section 31; Thence leaving said northerly line and Following easterly line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 31, 500"32'22"E a distance of 226.25 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar on the centerline of Farr Lateral; ENGINECRS I SURVEYORS I PLANNERS Page 49 Page 152 Item#4. Thence leaving said easterly line and following the centerline of said Farr Lateral the fallowing seven (7) courses: 1. S38"43'32"E a distance of 61.71 feet to a point; 2 S51"12'32"E a distance of 444.04 feet to a point; 3. SW36'10"E a distance of 272.66 feet to a point; 4. S86'04'31"E a distance of 206.22 feet to a point; 5. 573°45'13"E a distance of 301.51 feet to a point; S. 543'15'53"E a distance of 313.14 feet to a point; 7 S29°01'13"E a distance of 37.13 feet to a point on the easterly line of the West 112 of the Southwest 1/4 said Section 32; Thence leaving said centerline and following the easterly tine of the West 1/Z of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 32,500°08'25"E a distance of 206.12 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar on the easterly boundary of said Farr Lateral; Thence leaving said easterly lire and following the easterly boundary of said Farr Lateral the fallowing twelve(12)courses: 1. 22.57 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 144.57 feet,a delta angle of 08"56'24 ,a chord bearing of S56°50'40"W and a chord distance of 22.55 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 2. S5YM54"W a distance of 91.61 feat to a 1/2-inch rebar; 3. 122.47 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 220.00 feet, a delta angle of 31'5339",a chord bearing of 577'15'42"W and a chord distance of 120.89 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 4 N86°47'31"W a distance of 362.95 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 5. 583�47'06"W a distance of 26.72 feet to a 1/2-Inch rebar; fi 569"57'44"W a distance of 12&97 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 7. 90.59 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 110.00 feet,a delta angle of 47°20'30",a chord bearing of 546'18'02"W and a chord distance of 88.33 Beet to a point; S. 64.48 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 110.00 feet,a delta angle of 33935'03", a chord bearing of S05°50'15"W and chord distance of 63.56 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 9. S10°5745"E a distance of 410.17 feet to a V2-inch rebar; 10. 114,95 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 140.00 feel;,a delta angle of 4702'41", a chard bearing of 534°29'08"E and a chord distance of 111.75 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 11. S58"00'31"E a distance of 219.85 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 12. 569°55'45"E a distance of 503.32 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar on the easterly line of the West 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 of said Section 32; Thence leaving said easterly boundary and fallowing easterly line of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 2/4 of said Section 32,SWIM"E a distance of 431.17 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar common to Section 5,Township 2 North Range 1 East, B.M.,and Section 32,Township 3 North Range 1 East, B.M.; Thence leaving said easterly line and following the easterly line of the West 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 5,500°01'43"E a distance of 2,672.88 feet to the Center-West 1/16 corner of said Section 5; PAGE 12 Page 50 Page 153 Item#4. Thence leaving said easterly line and following the southerly line of the West 112 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 5,N89*W'38"1+V a distance of 1,329.65 feet to a brass cap common to Sections 5 and 6; Thence leaving said southerly line and following the southerly line of the East 112 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 6,N89"22'5WW a distance of 1,304.25 feet to a point; Thence leaving said southerly line,NOOa43'55"W a distance of 111.26 feet to a point; Thence lNDT20'23"W a distance of 549.25 feet to a point; Thence N87p3426"W a distance of 13.49 feet to the westerly line of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 6; Thence following the westerly line of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 6, N00°02'06"W a distance of 66.73 feet to a point on the westerly right-of-way line of the Rawson Canal; Thence leaving said westerly line and following the westerly right-of-way line of said Rawson Canal the following nine(9)courses: 1. N78`25'55"E a distance of 161.21 feet to a point; 2. N54°55'20"E a distance of 74.17 feet to a point; 3. N31"51'12"E a distance of 92.01 feet to a point; 4. 1\110"25'10"E a distance of 331.33 feet to a point; S. N05"26'52"W a distance of 105.26 feet to a point; 6. N18"56'20"W a distance of 287.65 feet to a paint; 7_ N32°08'38"W a distance of 91.83 feet to a point; 8. N61a32'57"W a distance of 104.61 feet to a point; 9. N7454'05"W a distance of 44.02 feet to a point; Thence leaving said westerly right-of--way line, N00'02'0Es'W a distance of 890.79 feet to a point on the northerly line of the}Northeast 1/4 of said Section 6; Thence following said northerly line,N8942'21"w a distance of 1,370,O0 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar common to Section 6,Township 2 North lunge I East,R-M., and Section 31,Township 3 North Range 1 East,B.M.; Thence leaving said northerly line and following the westerly line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 31, N00°16'52"E a distance of 1,342.44 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Center-South 1/16 cornerof said Section 31; Thence N00"16'52"E a distance of 1,342.44 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, Said parcel contains a total of 366.194 acres,more or less. Said description contains a total of 409.938 acres,more or less. 12 459 4 OF % PAGE 13 Page 51 Page 154 Item#4. 518.7� nSl°55'SS"� - r 'tT•wf�t8 rA• f 8 �s e W. x�f w rn w 3 � m sS9°57'15'w 1318.94 Title: Apex Subdivision Date: 08-17-2020 Scale: 1 inch=300 feet File: 200817 Apex Subdivision Legal 20-017 Tract 1: 43.744 Acres: 1905504 Sq Feet:Closure=s57.2522w 0.01 Feet Precision=1/627918: Perimeter 5510 Feel 001=s89.5715w 1318.94 006=s54.1810e 180.18 01 1—s61.5805e 207.13 002-n00.2534e 1558.66 a s��1 iei 03 0 1 2=s65.3250e 19337 003=01.5555e 518.76 008�S70A236e 107.80 013=00.3817w 1140.13 u61; R=5B160,n1!IVII3550 009=s 19.5724w 12.00 & 6_-0432�Chd�Sd.lD 005=A6.5243e 45A0 010==-7fl,0236e 14A5 Page 52 Page 155 Item#4. 1 2601.37 09°57'56"e f � v ni +e r O C � v a N ry _� � jJ SP3� n89°42'2I"w 137000 z3 �O 0 S.J log S f e.5 m v cv ri 4o r o N O 1 � n89°z2'S4'w a$4°52'3$"w 1304.25 1324.65 Tittle: Apex Subdivision Date. 08-18-2020 Scale; 1 inch= 1000 feet File:200817 Apex Subdivision Legal 20-017 Tract 1: 366.194 Acres: 15951396 5q Few:Clvsurt�s50.3758e 0.02 Feet Precis'tan>11999999: Perimettr= 19597 Fcet 001=n89.5756e 2601.37 016=s69.5744w 128.97 031=08.2555e 16L21 1)17:L.L R=I M19,0 odla 47 pw002= 00.3222e 226.26 tea ;a 032=n4.5S20e 74.17 nRN2wa n s5o003= 38,4332e 61.71 �d-63.56 033=01.5112e 92.01 004=s5I A 232e 444.04 019=sI0.5745e 410.17 034�n10.2510e 381.33 005=s60.3614e 272.66 I.aS oza;rile=lao.na o�: �.�a1 035= 05.2652w 106,26 e,Is�a.24osa c1a=l I 006-s86.043Ia 206.22 021=s58,003 le 219.85 036�nI8.5620w 287.65 007=s73,4513e 301.51 022-s69.5545e 503.32 037--T132.0838w 91.93 008=s43.1553e 313.74 023=500.1002e 431.17 038�n61.3257w 104.61 009,s29.0113e 37A3 024=sU0.0143e 2672.88 039=n74.5905w 44.02 010=s00.0825e 206-12 025�n89.5238w 1329.65 040-00,0206w$90.79 011:Rt R-144.67 UGI[Ia, 1a.56=4 026-n89.225Qw 1304.25 041=n89.42.21w 1370.00 Hog�56.5a40xr,4'1d°23.53 012=s61.1854w 91.61 027=n00-4355w 111.26 042=00.1652e [342.44 013:1;c R-224. Del[.-31.5339 028mn40.2023w 549.25 043�00.1652e 1342.44 014=n86.4731w 362.95 029--n87.3426w 13.49 015-s83.4746w 26.72 030� 00.020bw 66.73 Page 53 Page 156 Item#4. IX. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. The subject property shall no longer be subject to the terms of the existing Development Agreements (H-2015-0019: Brighton Investments,LLC—Inst. #2016-007072; SCS Brighton,LLC—Inst. #2016- 007073; Murgoitio Limited Partnership—Inst. #2016-007074)upon the property owner(s) entering into a new agreement. The new DA shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the City within six(6)months of City Council granting the subject modification. The new DA shall include the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the conceptual master plan, conceptual building elevations,preliminary plat,phasing plan,landscape plan, and qualified open space exhibits included in Section VIII and the provisions contained herein. b. Future preliminary plats shall include collector streets consistent with those shown on the Master Street Map, as required by Ada County Highway District. c. The land designated as Medium High-Density Residential(MHDR) on the Future Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan zoned R-15 shall develop with a variety of residential dwellings (i.e. single-family detached/attached,townhouses,condominiums,and/or apartments)at a gross density ranging from eight(8)to twelve(12)dwelling units per acre. Development shall incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place and shall incorporate connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways, attractive landscaping and a project identity consistent with the Comprehensive Plan(see pg. 3-10). d. Prior to development of the Mixed Use—Community(MU-C) designated areas shown on the Master Plan as"future development,"the Development Agreement shall be amended to include a conceptual development plan that demonstrates consistency with the general guidelines for Mixed Use developments and specifically the MU-C designation(see pgs. 3-13 and 3-15 thru 3-16). e. The rear and/or side of structures on lots that face E. Lake Hazel Rd. and S. Locust Grove Road, arterial streets, and S. Vertex Way,E. Tower St.,E. Crescendo St., S.Apex Ave. and E. Via Roberto St.,collector streets, shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches, balconies,material types,or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. f. Development within the Williams Pipeline easement shall comply with the Williams Developers' Handbook. g. All future development, except for single-family detached dwellings, is required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. h. The Murgoitio property(Parcel#S 1406110110)located southwest of the E. Lake Hazel/S. Locust Grove Road intersection shall be included in a future subdivision of the surrounding property (Parcel#S1406110350 or#S1406110015)in order to establish a legal division of land. Or,if a parcel division was approved by Ada County for the current configuration of the property,proof of such shall be submitted to the Planning Division with a future subdivision application for the surrounding property. i. The lot pfoposed to be afmexed(i.e. Lot > Bleek 1, fi*tufe de.'elopment; or-,the entire lot shall be ineitided in a f6ttffe subdivision. if a pr-epef�y Page 54 Page 157 Item#4. division is appr-eved by Ada Gou*ty,pf:eef of sueh shall be submitted to the Plamiting Division j. Multi-use pathways shall be provided with development as required by the Park's Department in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. k. The commercial(C-C zoned)portions of this development are allowed to obtain building permits prior to subdivision of the property. 2. The final plat submitted for Apex Northwest shall incorporate the following: a. Include a note stating direct lot access via E. Lake Hazel Rd., S. Locust Grove Rd., E. Crescendo St. and S. Apex Ave. is prohibited, except for those accesses approved by City of Meridian and Ada County Highway District. b. The north/south alley in Block 5 does not comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3B.5 as the entire length of the alley is not visible from a public street as required; common driveways may be considered as an alternative to the alley provided they meet the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D, subject to alternative compliance approval. c. Depict minimum 20-foot wide street buffers along E. Crescendo St. and S. Apex Ave., collector streets, in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.2. d. Cross-access easements shall be depicted between all commercial lots in the subdivisions in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A.2. 3. The final plat submitted for Apex Southeast shall incorporate the following revisions: a. Include a note stating direct lot access via E. Lake Hazel Rd., S. Locust Grove Rd., E. Tower St. S. Vertex Way and E.Via Roberto St. is prohibited, except for those accesses approved by City of Meridian and Ada County Highway District. b. Depict minimum 20-foot wide street buffers along E. Tower St., S.Vertex Way and E.Via Roberto St., collector streets, in accord with UDC 11-313-7C.2. c. Depict two(2)additional minimum 15-foot wide common lots for micro-path connections to Discovery Park at the east boundary in Block 14. d. Cross-access easements shall be depicted between all commercial lots in the subdivisions in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A.2. 4. The landscape plan submitted with the final plat application for Apex Northwest shall be revised as follows: a. Depict multi-use pathways in accord with the Pathways Master Plan as required by the Park's Dept. in Section IX.E. Landscaping shall be depicted along either side of the pathways as set forth in UDC 11-313-12C. b. Depict landscaping within all required street buffers along arterial and collector streets in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-7C. c. Include a calculations table listing the number of trees required vs. those proposed in common open space areas, street buffers,parkways, and along pathways that demonstrate compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3, 11-313-7C.3, 11-313-12C respectively. d. Include mitigation information for any existing trees proposed to be removed from the site in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-1OC.5. e. If the unimproved right-of-way is 10 feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line,the Developer is required to maintain a 10 foot compacted shoulder meeting the Page 55 Page 158 Item#4. construction standards of ACHD and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.5. A license agreement for improvements within the right-of-way is required between the property owner and ACHD. f. Depict a gazebo with tables and benches as an amenity in Lot 32,Block 5; include a detail of the gazebo. 5. The landscape plan submitted with the final plat application for Apex Southeast shall be revised as follows: a. Depict multi-use pathways in accord with the Pathways Master Plan as required by the Park's Dept. in Section IX.E. Landscaping shall be depicted along either side of the pathways as set forth in UDC 11-313-12C. b. Depict landscaping within all required street buffers along arterial and collector streets in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. c. Include a calculations table listing the number of trees required vs. those proposed in common open space areas, street buffers,parkways, and along pathways that demonstrate compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3, 11-313-7C.3, 11-313-12C respectively. d. Include mitigation information for any existing trees proposed to be removed from the site in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-1OC.5. e. If the unimproved right-of-way is 10 feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line,the Developer is required to maintain a 10 foot compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of ACHD and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.5. A license agreement for improvements within the right-of-way is required between the property owner and ACHD. f. Depict two(2)additional minimum 15-foot wide common lots with 5-foot wide micro-paths in Block 14 at the east boundary; depict landscaping on either side of the pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-12C. g. Depict the children's play equipment proposed in the central common area; include a detail of the play equipment. 6. Future development shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-6, 11-2A-7 and 11-2B-3 for the R-8,R-15 and C-C zoning districts respectively. 7. Off-street parking is required to be provided for residential uses in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 based on the number of bedrooms per unit; and for non-residential uses in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-613.1. 8. An exhibit shall be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks, fencing,building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via common driveways; if a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street,the driveway shall be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D. 9. Address signage shall be provided at the public street for homes accessed via common driveways for emergency wayfinding purposes. 10. A perpetual ingress/egress easement shall be filed with the Ada County Recorder for the common driveways,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D.8. A copy of said easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division with the final plat for City Engineer signature; or,this information may be included in a note on the face of the plat. Page 56 Page 159 Item#4. 11. A 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division for the 10-foot wide multi-use pathways proposed within the site that are not located within right-of-way,prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer for the phase in which they are located. 12. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted and approved prior to submittal of any building permit applications for the swimming pool facility in the residential portion of the development; and for all non-residential/commercial uses and structures.A Design Review application is required to be submitted for single-family attached units; one application can be submitted for the overall development if desired. 13. The qualified open spaee exhibits fOF the residentially zoned portions of Apex Northwest and Apex Southeast shall be revised prior to the Council hearing to only depiet areas that qualify PeF the standaFds listed in UDC 11 3G 3B.if additional qualified needed,the plat should be revised to eompl�- B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 The north-south sewer line in the landscaped area of Block 5 (Apex NW)needs to be moved east to the paved access road. 1.2 No sewer or water lines have been shown to the lots in Block 7 (Apex NW). Each lot will need to have services provided. 1.3 Public Work's preference is to see all water utilities in the public right-of-way(R-O-W),where they can easily be operated and maintained. If the utilities truly cannot be installed in the public right-of- way,then our preference would be for utilities to be located in a dedicated and improved alley. If that cannot be accomplished,the applicant should work with Public Works for further solutions that meet both the developer's design constraints and Public Works'maintenance needs. 1.4 This development will need to be modeled at final plat to verify each phase meets minimum fire flow pressures 1.5 From the preliminary geotechnical investigation of groundwater elevation provided in the application, it appears that groundwater may not be a factor with the development of this subdivision. The initial investigative report is dated April 8,2018, and additional data collection is recommended to confirm actual groundwater levels. Updated data and recommendations from a geotechnical professional shall be required with the submittal of construction design drawings. 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub- grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility,or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Page 57 Page 160 Item#4. Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x 11"map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B)for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals,or drains, exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)898- 5500 for inspections of disconnection of services.Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at(208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits for the residential portions of the development. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C- 3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. Page 58 Page 161 Item#4. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public works.aspx?id=272. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT Northwest: https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WeUink/Doc View.asp x?id=189722&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiiy&cr=1 Southeast: https://weblink.meridiancity.org WWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=189784&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCio! D. POLICE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancioy.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=190778&dbid=0&repo=Meridian CibX E. PARK's DEPARTMENT Northeast: https://weblink.meridianciU.or lWebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=191486&dbid=0&repo=MeridianQU Southeast: https://weblink.meridiancit .00rg/WeUink/Doc View.aspx?id=1914 8 7&db id=0&rep o=Meridia n City Page 59 Page 162 Item#4. F. WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT(WASD) https://weblink.meridianciN.ofg WWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=190290&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiU G. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO(COMPASS) Northwest: https://weblink.meridianciU.ofglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=190975&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiu Southeast: https://weblink.m eridia n c i ty.ory/WeUink/Doc View.aspx?id=19 09 7 7&db id=0&repo=Meridian City H. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) AZ/RZ: https://weblink.meridiancity.orQ/WebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=191226&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCioy Northwest: https://weblink.meridianciU.orglWebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=192784&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiU Southeast: https://weblink.meridianciU.orkIWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=192785&dbid=0&repo=Meridiancity I. BOISE PROJECT BOARD OF CONTROL(BPBC) https://weblink.meridianciU.org/WeUink/DocView.aspx?id=189951&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCitX J. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT(NMID) Northwest: https://weblink.meridianciU.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=190512&dbid=0&repo=Meridian CitX Southeast: https://weblink.meridiancitE.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=190510&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity K. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT Northwest: https://weblink.meridiancitE.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=190604&dbid=0&repo=Meridian CitX Southeast: https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.asp x?id=190605&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity L. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) https://weblink.meridiancioy.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=190598&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiU X. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. hi order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: Page 60 Page 163 Item#4. 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment to RL-2-,-R-8, R-15& C-C and proposed development is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan if the Applicant complies with the provisions in Section IX. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the proposed single-family attached and detached homes with front-loaded and alley-loaded options will contribute to the range of housing opportunities in the City; other residential types may be provided with future phases of development. The City Council finds the commercial portion of the property will provide for the retail and service needs of the community in accord with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment will not result in an adverse impact on the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. designatien in Me Gempi-ehensive Plan and thHs is. in the best intepest of the City.-Not applicable B. Preliminary Plat Findings: In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; The City Council finds that the proposed preliminary plats, with recommended conditions, are in substantial compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density, transportation, and pedestrian connectivity. (Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies in, Section V of this report for more information) 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds that public services will be provided to the subject properties proposed to be subdivided with development. (See Section IX of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers) 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the development at their own cost, the City Council finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. Page 61 Page 164 Item#4. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development based upon comments from the public service providers (i.e., Police, Fire, ACHD, etc). (See Section IXfor more information) 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health,safety or general welfare; and, The City Council is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated with the platting of this property. ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The City Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that exist on this site that require preserving. Page 62 Page 165 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Apex Northwest (H-2020-OOS6) by Brighton, Murgoitio, et al., Located at the Northwest Corner of S. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Lake Hazel Rd. Page 166 Item#5. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW #... AND DECISION& ORDER , In the Matter of the Request for a Modification to the Existing Development Agreements(H-2015- 0019: Brighton Investments,LLC—Inst.#2016-007072; SCS Brighton,LLC—Inst.#2016-007073; Murgoitio Limited Partnership—Inst.#2016-007074)to Replace the Agreements with One New Agreement Based on the Proposed Development Plan; Rezone of 384.97 acres of Land from the R-4 to the R-8(144.78+ 119.28=264.06 acres),R-15(76.93 acres) and C-C (43.28 acres)Zoning Districts; Preliminary Plat Consisting of 120 Residential Buildable Lots, 11 Commercial Buildable Lots and 14 Common Lots on 41.75 Acres of Land in the C-C and R-15 Zoning Districts; and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 237 Residential Buildable Lots,2 Commercial Buildable Lots,30 Common Lots and 10 Other(Shared Driveway)Lots on 81.63 Acres of Land in the C-C and R-8 Zoning Districts,by Brighton,Murgoitio, et al. Case No(s).H-2020-0066;H-2020-0056; H-2020-0057 For the City Council Hearing Date of: August 11,2020 (Findings on August 25,2020) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11, 2020, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11,2020, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11, 2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11, 2020, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § l l-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR APEX—MDA,RZ H-2020-0066;NORTHWEST—PP H-2020-0056;SOUTHEAST—PP H-2020-0057 - I Page 167 Item#5. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11,2020, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § I I-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for a modification to the existing Development Agreements,Rezone and Preliminary Plats is hereby approved per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11,2020, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years.Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 11- 6B-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-651 IA. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR APEX—MDA,RZ H-2020-0066;NORTHWEST—PP H-2020-0056;SOUTHEAST—PP H-2020-0057 -2- Page 168 Item#5. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28)days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11,2020 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR APEX—MDA,RZ H-2020-0066;NORTHWEST—PP H-2020-0056;SOUTHEAST—PP H-2020-0057 -3 Page 169 Item#5. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 25th day of August 2020. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 8-25-2020 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR APEX—MDA,RZ H-2020-0066;NORTHWEST—PP H-2020-0056;SOUTHEAST—PP H-2020-0057 -4 Page 170 Item#5. EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORTC�WE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 8/11/2020 legend 0 Project Lacfl�ian � TO: Mayor&City Council I f -- .i FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner f 208-884-5533 - -- -- Y - F SUBJECT: H-2020-0066 Apex—MDA,A?RZ ; H-2020-0056 Apex Northwest—PP - - H-2020-0057 Apex Southeast—PP IF - _ 5 (to be marketed as "Pinnacle') - C LOCATION: MDA,A7,,RZ: generally located east of N_a S. Meridian Rd. and north of E. k Columbia Rd., in Sections 31 (S. '/2 and --- , NW '/4) and 32 (SW'/4),Township 3N., _ Range LE; and Sections 5 (NW %4) and 6 (NE '/4), T.2N.,R.1 E. PP(NW):NWC of S. Locust Grove Rd. &E. Lake Hazel Rd., in the SE '/4 of Section 31,T.3N., R.IE PP(SE): SEC of S. Locust Grove Rd. & E. Lake Hazel Rd., in the NW '/4 of Section 5,T.2N.,R.1E. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Modification to existing Development Agreements(H-2015-0019: Brighton Investments, LLC—Inst. #2016- 007072; SCS Brighton,LLC—Inst. #2016-007073; Murgoitio Limited Partnership—Inst. #2016-007074)to replace the agreements with one new agreement based on the proposed development plan; ^rrexatio of nn nn and,Rezone of 384.97 acres of land from the R-4 to the R 2 (0.79 aefe}R-8 (144.78+ 119.28=264.06 acres),R-15 (76.93 acres) and C-C(43.28 acres)zoning districts. Apex Northwest(NW): Preliminary Plat consisting of 120 residential buildable lots, 11 commercial buildable lots and 14 common lots on 41.75 acres of land in the C-C and R-15 zoning districts. Apex Southeast(SE): Preliminary Plat consisting of 237 residential buildable lots,2 commercial buildable lots, 30 common lots and 10 other(shared driveway)lots on 81.63 acres of land in the C-C and R-8 zoning districts. Because right-of-way for E. Lake Hazel Rd. and S. Locust Grove Rd. separates the land proposed to be platted, two separate preliminary plat applications are required to subdivide the property. Page 1 — Page 171 Item#5. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage ^�."�r384.97(RZ);41.75 (PP-Northwest); 81.63 (PP-Southeast) Existing/Proposed Zoning RUT in Ada County(existing);R-4(Medium Low-Density Residential) Future Land Use Designation Low ensity Residential[LDR(3-or-fewer units/aere) 34aeres); Medium Density Residential(MDR—3 to 8 units/acre)(206/-acres); Medium High-Density Residential(21+/-acres); &Mixed Use— Community(MU-C)(120+/-acres) Existing Land Use(s) Agricultural Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family residential(SFR)attached/detached,commercial,office,2 schools(elementary&charter) Lots(#and type;bldg./common) NW: 120 residential buildable/II commercial buildable/14 common SE:237 residential buildable/2 commercial buildable/30 common/10 other NW&SE Combined: 357 SFR residential buildable; 13 commercial buildable;44 common lots;and 10 other lots for shared driveways Phasing Plan(#of phases) 3 (NW); 5 (SE) Number of Residential Units(type NW: 120 units(88 detached/32 attached) of units) SE:237 units(detached) NW&SE Combined: 325 detached&88 attached Density(gross&net) NW: 5.62 units/acre(gross); 11.21 units/acre(net) SE: 3.75 units/acre(gross);6.17 units/acre(net) NW&SE(overall):4.22 units/acre(gross);7.27 units/acre(net) Open Space(acres,total NW: 6.33 acres(15.17%) [%]/buffer/qualified) SE: 10.79 acres(13.22%) NW&SE Combined: 17.12 acres(or 13.88%) Amenities NW: Community center with a clubhouse,community post office,cafe, library/business center;community amphitheater;additional common open space above the minimum required. SE: Community swimming pool,tot lot with play equipment,pathway access to the City's Discovery Park,additional common open space above the minimum required. Physical Features(waterways, The Farr Lateral runs along the north and east boundaries of this site;the hazards,flood plain,hillside) McBirney Lateral crosses the site east/west;and another waterway runs north/south through the site. Neighborhood meeting date;#of 2/5/20;29 attendees W attendees: History(previous approvals) ROS#7394;ROS#7783;H-2015-0019—South Meridian AZ(DA's: Brighton Investments,LLC—Inst.#2016-007072; SCS Brighton,LLC— Inst.#2016-007073;and Murgoitio Limited Partnership—Inst.#2016- 007074) B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Yes(PP,draft);Yes(AZ,RZ) • Requires ACHD Yes(TBD) Commission Action (yes/no) Traffic Impact Study(yes/no) Yes Page 2 Page 172 Item#5. Description Details I Page Access NW:2 accesses via S.Locust Grove Rd. &2 accesses via E. Lake Hazel Rd.,both (Arterial/Collectors/State existing arterial streets;and 2 collector streets are proposed Hwy/Local)(Existing and SE: 2 accesses via E.Lake Hazel Rd. &3 accesses via S.Locust Grove Rd.,both Proposed) existing arterial streets; and 3 collector streets are proposed Traffic Level of Service Better than"D"(Acceptable level of service is"E")—Lake Hazel,Locust Grove &Amity Roads Stub Two stub streets are proposed to this site from Prevail Subdivision near the Street/Interconnectivity/Cross northwest corner of the rezone area;no other stub streets exist to this site. Access Stub streets are proposed to adjacent properties for interconnectivity as shown on the preliminary plats. Existing Road Network There are no existing streets within the site,only S.Meridian Rd./SH-69,E.Lake Hazel Rd.and S.Locust Grove Rd.adjacent to the site Existing Arterial Sidewalks/ There are no existing sidewalks or buffers along Meridian Rd./SH-69,Lake Hazel, Buffers or Locust Grove Roads. Proposed Road Capital Improvements Plan{CIP}t Irriegrated Five Year Wark Plan JIFYWP): Improvements ■ Vd9lb RUA 15�rNALlgd Ift the IFYINP io be Wid�M 4 la 5-hWos fllotn Lake Ha,!Et RoAd td A nn ty Road to 2023 * Eagle Road G sanamw 1n me IFYWP m be wp]9nw to 5-Panes tram Amp Roeu to vwioiry Road In 2021 + Laka Haza tined is sl fi dulod Hi Ina[l'NOF 10 bo WMenad kb 5-1arres fmrli 1=iJgla Road to Ckwerdelle Road iR 2024 + Leka Naze;Road is schad+dl9d in me iFYWP to be wrdemed to 5-mws from Cloveadsle Road to Five btde Road + Tw inlnrseu mn or Lake Ha291 Rood and Pa* RW rs sclwdulad e1 th9 IF'(WPv to M widened 1a 5-lipnes Qn the ngr4h lag,4aenes on ffu�sand+aeg,3-lone5 on the+Mast leg end 3- lano�s on the east leg and signohzed in 2023 + T>v inkwEK tivn 0 lovusi Grrnye Rid end 1 KImy Road is wchedul in the 1FYVJP to be� constructed as a muiilane touinmb uR voth 4-lanes on me narth ornd south legs and 24anes on the east and west kegs in 201 1 * Labe Plarzel Road qs bstud 1n me CPR to be w w1oned to 3-1:anes ham Locust Grove Road to Eagle Road berween 2026 and.Z63t1 Lake Hzxzel Road Is listed lit the C IP io be widened to 3-;anes from hl ndlan Road ISH-W to L4cusl Grave Road balwemn 2026 arrel 2030. A fnity Road is Wed in the CIP to tre widened to 5-vnes tram Locus)Grove#toed to Eagle Reed berween nNi ghd 233t} The Intwsec6on of Lake Hazel Road and Lxmt Orove Rood n listed to the CIP to Ge r-sconstiluctad as a single larte roundaboul widened to 34arres on toe MOP]leg,2•Pi9 05 Lin the south,2-Torres ees[,and 3-ianes on the wart lQg w1117 a msiwi-md bypass tight turn bypass lane between 20W and 2Q311 + The inimeoiw of Lake Hazel Raerd and SHE is listed en the CIP to be widened 90 7aenes on the north,saulh,west and ems)legs end signaized between ME and 20313 • The utt9r5ecfi4n of List GFaya F60ed end Amgyr Rued is I15ted ir}the CIR to wiAeRetf to 4- hanes an 1ha north leg,3-tines on the south lag,5�Ianos on the west leg and 9-4anss on the east leg and signalized between 2GX and HMO Additional right-of-way is required to be dedicated for the future expansion of Lake Hazel&Locust Grove Roads with pavement widened to 17' from centerline Fire Service • Distance to Fire Station NW—3.3 miles to Fire Station 94 SE—3.1 miles to Fire Station#4 • Fire Response Time NW&SE-only a small portion falls within 5 minute response time goal • Resource Reliability NW&SE-78%-does not meet target goal of 80%or greater • Risk Identification NW&SE— 1 and 4,current resources would not be adequate to supply service to this project • Accessibility NW&SE-Project meets all required access,road widths and turnarounds if phasing plan is followed Page 3 Page 173 Item#5. Description Details Page • Special/resource needs NW&SE-Project will require an aerial device;response time is 9 minutes travel time(under ideal conditions)—can meet this need in the required timeframe if needed • Water Supply NW&SE-Requires 1,500 gallons per minute for 2 hours,may be less if buildings are fully sprinklered • Other Resources Police Service • Distance to Police 4.5 miles Station • Police Response Time Average response time in the City is just under 4 minutes—there isn't enough public initiated call data to determine an average response time for this area(goal is 3-5 minutes) • Calls for Service 71 (within a mile of site between 3/15/2019-3/14/2020) • Accessibility No concerns • Specialty/resource needs No additional resources are required at this time. • Crimes 10(within a mile of site between 3/15/2019-3/14/2020) • Crashes 38(within a mile of site between 3/15/2019-3/14/2020) • Other The MPD can provide service if this development is approved as they already serve this area. West Ada School District • Distance(elem,ms,hs) • Capacity of Schools Enr611m nt dr Miles &b v+awu • #of Students Enrolled Marys'MCPherioA Elememvy.. s5s 550 2h SlemElemeMary" 677 301) 3.1 vlewrw mWdle school 959 ]QW 4.2 mwntain vkwMilh khmi U19 zM9 34 —thdrin2 the 2N21 PChgvl ye4ar Mpry McPhergon's Student uPidtq will mcrcw%6 675r due 16 9hr mn cmi 0255r4"M expansion underway.** —Enrollrmnt at HrFIsddk E'emnentary h c-armiry upped.I;Ments In this dere{aprnent thal are In the HIWAam Mwldefy will he wrtanding Siena Fhtment■r}'una1 eieArstI166i Is h„1h t8 eiimineteauertrawE:ng all.HIWAaJe.*`* • #of Students Anticipated 286 from this Development Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Directly adjacent Services • Sewer Shed South Black Cat Trunk Shed • Estimated Project Sewer See application ERU's • WRRF Declining 13.95 Balance • Project Consistent with Yes WW Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts/Concerns Flow has been committed Water • Distance to Water Directly adjacent Services • Pressure Zone 5 • Estimated Project Water See application ERU's Page 4 Page 174 Item#5. • Water Quality None • Project Consistent with Yes ■ Water Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns Public Worles preference is to see all water utilities in the public right-of-way (ROW),where they can easily be operated and maintained.If the utilities truly cannot be installed in the public right-of-way,then our preference would be for utilities to be located in a dedicated and improved alley. If that cannot be accomplished,the applicant should work with Public Works for further solutions C. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend iul 0 Legend Pra t Laoulkm i fibI ProjEHat LmafiDn y mu-C "AU`R J �hed-I ig vnr' _ Resid nfial Zoning Map Planned Development Map Legend R T 10 Legend 0 Prajent Luc n=an Prcject Lnca5an Ku r R R- , city Llmik I-L Rl RUJT — Planned Flumes RU R-8 UT -R- R- U. -- RUT R-8- 14T R4 _ R R-2 - _ t TA— RUT RUT RUT C� --- Page 5 Page 175 Item#5. III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Brighton,Murgoitio,et al—2929 W.Navigator#400,Meridian,ID 83642 B. Owner: Same as Applicant C. Representative: Michael D. Wardle,Brighton Corporation—2929 W.Navigator#400,Meridian,ID 83642 IV. NOTICING Planning&Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Notification published in 6/19/2020 7/24/2020 newspaper Notification mailed to property owners within 300 feet 6/16/2020 7/21/2020 Applicant posted public hearing notice on site 6/26/2020 7/29/2020 Nextdoor posting 6/16/2020 7/21/2020 V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS(Comprehensive Plan) Land Use: The Future Land Use Map(FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan designates approximately 39 aer-es of the site as I e w Density Residential it DRR ,206+/-acres as Medium Density Residential(MDR); 21+/-acres as Medium High-Density Residential(MHDR); and 120+/-acres as Mixed Use—Community(MU-C). A future school site and City Park is designated in the general area northwest of the Locust Grove/Lake Hazel intersection,north of the MU-C designated area. Another school site is designated on the east side of N. Locust Grove Rd.,north of Lake Hazel Rd.,just north of the subject rezone area. The LPR designa4ion allows feF the development of single family homes oft large a-ad estate lots at gross densities of 3 dwelling units or-less per-aer-e. These areas eften transition between existing rufal r-esidefi4ial and urban properties. Developments need to r-espeet agr-ieultufal heritage and r-eseufees,r-eeegaize view sheds and open spaees, a-ad maintain or-improve the over-all atmosphere of the area. The use of open > , and other-. iate means shetil d o„h.nee the,.,.,,.actor of the area. The MDR designation allows for dwelling units at gross densities of 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The MHDR designation allows for a mix of dwelling types including townhouses,condominiums, and apartments. Residential gross densities should range from 8 to 12 dwelling units per acre. These areas are relatively compact within the context of larger neighborhoods and are typically located around or near mixed use commercial or employment areas to provide convenient access to services and jobs for residents. Developments need to incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place and should also incorporate connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways, attractive landscaping and a project identity. The purpose of the MU-C designation is to allocate areas where community-serving uses and dwellings are seamlessly integrated into the urban fabric. The intent is to integrate a variety of uses, including residential, and to avoid mainly single-use and strip commercial type buildings.Non-residential buildings in these areas Page 6 Page 176 Item#5. have a tendency to be larger than in Mixed Use—Neighborhood(MU-N) areas,but not as large as in Mixed Use—Regional(MU-R) areas. Goods and services in these areas tend to be of the variety that people will mainly travel by car to,but also walk or bike to(up to 3 or 4 miles). Employment opportunities for those living in and around the neighborhood are encouraged. Developments are encouraged to be designed according to the conceptual MU-C plan depicted in Figure 3C in the Comprehensive Plan(see pg. 3-16). In reviewing development applications,the items noted on Pgs. 3-13, 3-15 and 3-16 will be considered(see analysis below). Transportation: ACHD's Master Street Map (MSM)depicts an east/west residential collector street at the half mile between Amity and Lake Hazel Roads; a north/south industrial collector at the half mile between Meridian and Locust Grove Roads north of the half mile between Amity and Lake Hazel Roads,which transitions to a residential collector to the south to Lake Hazel Rd.; a commercial collector around the MU-C designated area at the Locust Grove/Lake Hazel intersection(see dashed lines on map below), and a residential collector along the southern boundary of Apex Southeast.A dual lane roundabout is planned at the Locust Grove/Lake Hazel Rd. intersection.Note:Because a residential collector seems to be more appropriate than an industrial collector street designation in this area,ACHD has included a change to the street classification in the MSM update currently in process. The proposed preliminary plats depict collector streets consistent with the MSM(i.e. E. Crescendo St. & S. Apex Ave. in Apex Northwest; and E. Tower St., S.Vertex Way and E.Via Roberto St. in Apex Southeast). The proposed Master Plan included in Section VIII.A, depicts conceptual street locations in the annexation/rezone area; future preliminary plats should provide collector streets in accord with the MSM as required by ACHD. ti �- r IF 41 -P W-11' J Proposed Development: The Applicant proposes to develop the 41.75 acre property at the northwest corner of Locust Grove and Lake Hazel Roads in the MDR&MU-C designated areas with 120 single-family residential units consisting of 32 attached units and 88 detached units, a future public elementary school, and neighborhood-scale commercial uses as allowed in the C-C zoning district. The 81.63 acre property located at the southeast corner of Locust Grove and Lake Hazel Roads in the MDR and MU-C designated areas is Page 7 Page 177 Item#5. proposed to develop with 237 single-family residential detached units,a charter school, and commercial uses as allowed in the C-C zoning district. A City Park is not required to be provided with this development due to the proximity of Discovery Park at the project's southeast boundary; however,the Park's Dept.would be willing to discuss the potential for a partnership if desired by the Applicant. The following Comprehensive Plan Policies are applicable to this development: • "Encourage a variety of housing types that meet the needs, preferences, and financial capabilities of Meridian's present and future residents."(2.01.02D) A mix of single family attached and detached units(alley-loaded)are proposed in Apex Northwest; only single-family detached units (front and alley-loaded) are proposed in Apex Southeast. • "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and urban services at the time of final approval,and in accord with any adopted levels of service for public facilities and services."(3.03.03F) City water and sewer service is available and can be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. • "Avoid the concentration of any one housing type or lot size in any geographical area;provide for diverse housing types throughout the City."(2.01.01 G) A mix of single family attached and detached units (alley-loaded) are proposed in Apex Northwest; only single-family detached units (front-and alley-loaded) are proposed in Apex Southeast. • "Encourage compatible uses and site design to minimize conflicts and maximize use of land." (3.07.00) The proposed residential uses should be compatible with existing rural residential/agricultural uses in the area. The proposed design of the commercial and residential areas with streets separating the uses should minimize conflicts. • "With new subdivision plats,require the design and construction of pathway connections, easy pedestrian and bicycle access to parks, safe routes to schools,and the incorporation of usable open space with quality amenities." (2.02.01A) Internal pedestrian pathways are proposed through common areas for interconnectivity as well as to the City Park on the east side of Apex Southeast and to perimeter sidewalks. Segments of the City's multi-use pathway system are required in accord with the Pathways Master Plan (see Park's Dept. comments in Section IX.E).Detached sidewalks are proposed along the arterial and collector streets for safe pedestrian access. Usable open space and quality amenities are proposed(see detailed analysis below in Section VIB). • "Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development."(3.03.03A) The proposed development will connect to City water and sewer systems;services are required to be provided to and though this development in accord with current City plans. • "Require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks,water and sewer utilities."(3.03.03G) Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter and sidewalks is required to be provided with development as proposed with the preliminary plats. Page 8 Page 178 Item#5. • "Encourage the development of high quality, dense residential and mixed use areas near in and around Downtown,near employment, large shopping centers,public open spaces and parks, and along major transportation corridors, as shown on the Future Land Use Map."(2.02.01E) Lake Hazel Rd. lies between the proposed preliminary plats and is classified as a residential mobility arterial that is planned to be a major transportation corridor. A City Park(Discovery Park)abuts the east side of the proposed Apex Southeast subdivision.All four corners of the Lake Hazel/Locust Grove intersection are designated for mixed use (MU-C)development. Development in this area should be high quality and more densely populated at a minimum of 6 units/acre in the MU-C designated area. The gross density of Apex Southeast is only 3.75 units per acre while the density of Apex Northwest is 5.62 units per acre.Staff encourages a higher density due to the location of this site adjacent to a major transportation corridor and City Parr This could be attained through the inclusion of more dense housing types such as more single-family attached units, townhome units and/or multi family apartments. • "Ensure development provides safe routes and access to schools,parks, and other community gathering places."(2.02.01G) Detached sidewalks and pathways are proposed throughout the proposed subdivisions for safe pedestrian access to the future school sites, the City Park and neighborhood commercial/office uses. • "Where feasible, encourage large transmission and pipeline utility corridors to function as transitional buffers,parkland,pathways,and gathering spaces within and adjacent to their right of way."(3.07.01E) A 75 foot wide easement for the Williams Northwest Gas Pipeline crosses this site and is depicted on the Master Plan and preliminary plats as grassy open space area containing a multi-use pathway. No structures are allowed within this easement. • "Require collectors consistent with the ACHD Master Street Map(MSM), generally at/near the mid- mile location within the Area of City Impact."(6.01.03B) Collector streets are proposed on the preliminary plats in accord with the MSM; collector streets will be required to be provided with future preliminary plats in accord with the MSM as required by ACHD. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in all Mixed Use areas, per the Comprehensive Plan(pg.3-13): (Staffs analysis in italics) • "A mixed-use project should include at least three types of land uses. Exceptions may be granted for smaller sites on a case-by-case basis. This land use is not intended for high density residential development alone." The proposed development includes four(4) different land use types—residential(single-family), civic (i.e. amphitheater and community center), commercial and office. • "Where appropriate,higher density and/or multi-family residential development is encouraged for projects with the potential to serve as employment destination centers and when the project is adjacent to US 20/26, SH-55, SH-16 or SH-69." Although a small portion of land proposed to be annexed with this application fronts on SH-69/S. Meridian Rd., it is not proposed to redevelop with this application and is designated for LDR uses. • "Mixed Use areas are typically developed under a master or conceptual plan; during an annexation or rezone request,a development agreement will typically be required for developments with a Mixed Use designation." A Master Plan is proposed with the rezone request for the portion of the property surrounding the Lake Hazel/Locust Grove intersection designated as MU-C(see Section VIII.A).A Development Agreement Page 9 Page 179 Item#5. is required as a provision of the rezone to ensure future development is consistent with the MU-C FL UM designation. • "In developments where multiple commercial and/or office buildings are proposed,the buildings should be arranged to create some form of common,usable area, such as a plaza or green space." The Master Plan for Apex Northwest depicts a community center with a plaza and amphitheater in the commercial portion of the development. The Master Plan for the commercial portion of Apex Southeast nearest the intersection doesn't include a development plan—the future plan should include some form of common, usable area such as a plaza or green space as desired as should other future commercial/office areas in MU-C designated areas where future development is unknown at this time. • "The site plan should depict a transitional use and/or landscaped buffering between commercial and existing low-or medium-density residential development." There are no existing residential uses adjacent to proposed commercial development; therefore, transitional uses and buffering aren't applicable. • "Community-serving facilities such as hospitals,clinics, churches, schools,parks, daycares,civic buildings, or public safety facilities are expected in larger mixed-use developments." A public school is planned in Apex Northwest and a charter school is planned in Apex Southeast per the Master Plan in accord with the FL UM which depicts two school sites in this general area.A community center and amphitheater is proposed in the commercial portion of Apex Northwest. A 27-acre City Park (Discovery Park) abuts the east side of Apex Southeast.A linear open space is planned where the Williams Northwest Gas Pipeline easement is located. • "Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks,plazas,outdoor gathering areas, open space,libraries, and schools are expected; outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count." An outdoor amphitheater, community center with a plaza and charter school is proposed in this development in the MU-C designated area. Discovery Park, a 27-acre regional City park, exists to the east of Apex Southeast and includes picnic shelters,pathways, open play areas,play structures, a splash pad, an off-leash dog park and ballfields. • "Mixed use areas should be centered around spaces that are well-designed public and quasi-public centers of activity. Spaces should be activated and incorporate permanent design elements and amenities that foster a wide variety of interests ranging from leisure to play. These areas should be thoughtfully integrated into the development and further placemaking opportunities considered." The public/quasi-public areas (i.e. community center and amphitheater)proposed in this development are centrally located within the mixed use designated area in Apex Northwest. Discovery Park abuts Apex Southeast and offers a wide variety of activities for area residents. • "All mixed-use projects should be directly accessible to neighborhoods within the section by both vehicles and pedestrians." The proposed mixed use developments will be directly accessible to adjacent neighborhoods within the section through extension of streets and internal pedestrian pathways. • "Alleys and roadways should be used to transition from dissimilar land uses, and between residential densities and housing types." Roadways are proposed as a transition between residential and commercial land uses in both of the proposed subdivisions; and alleys, roadways and common areas are proposed between residential housing types and densities as desired. Page 10 Page 180 Item#5. • "Because of the parcel configuration within Old Town,development is not subject to the Mixed Use standards listed herein." The subject property is not located in Old Town, therefore, this item is not applicable. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in MU-C areas, per the Comprehensive Plan (pgs.3-15 thru 3-16): • "Developments should comply with the general guidelines for development in all Mixed Use areas." See analysis above. • "All developments should have a mix of at least three land use types." The proposed development has a mix of residential, commercial, office and civic uses as desired. • "Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 20%of the development area at gross densities ranging from 6 to 15 units/acre." Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 20%of the overall MU-C designated area at a minimum density of 6 units/acre. Prior to development of the `future development"areas on the Master Plan, a conceptual development plan should be submitted to ensure compliance. • "Non-residential buildings should be proportional to and blend in with adjacent residential buildings." The design, color, construction materials and height of non-residential buildings should be proportional to and blend with adjacent residential buildings as desired. • "Vertically integrated structures are encouraged." No vertically integrated structures are proposed at this time but are encouraged to be included. • "Unless a structure contains a mix of both residential and office, or residential and commercial land uses, a maximum building size should be limited to a 30,000 square-foot building footprint. For community grocery stores,the maximum building size should be limited to a 30,000 square-foot building footprint. For community grocery stores,the maximum building size should be limited to a 60,000 square-foot building footprint. For the development of public school sites,the maximum building size does not apply." The building footprints shown on the Master Plan do not exceed 30,000 square feet;future development should be consistent with this guideline. • "Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks,plazas, outdoor gathering areas, open space,libraries,and schools that comprise a minimum of 5%of the development area are required. Outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count towards this requirement." A community center with a plaza area and amphitheater are proposed in Apex Northwest adjacent to service commercial and office uses; a charter school is proposed in Apex Southeast. These types of spaces and places and uses should be provided in all of the MU-C designated areas in accord with this guideline. Linear open space containing a multi-use pathway is proposed where the Williams Northwest Gas Pipeline easement is located. • Where the development proposes public and quasi-public uses to support the development above the minimum 5%,the developer may be eligible for additional residential densities and/or an increase to the maximum building footprint." Although this is an option, the developer is not requesting an increase in density or in the maximum building footprint allowed. Staff believes the proposed development plan is generally consistent with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density and transportation. Page 11 Page 181 Item#5. VI. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ANALYSIS(UDC A. Development Agreement Modification (MDA): The Applicant proposes to modify the existing Development Agreements(H-2015-0019: Brighton Investments, LLC—Inst. #2016-007072; SCS Brighton, LLC—Inst. #2016-007073; Murgoitio Limited Partnership—Inst. #2016-007074)for this property in order to replace the agreements with one new agreement based on the proposed Master Plan(see Section VIII.A). The existing Development Agreements (DA's)were required with the South Meridian Annexation application in 2015. Because that application was initiated by the City,no development was proposed at that time. A"placeholder"zoning of R-4 was assigned to all of the properties with the requirement that any future development would require an amendment to the DA's to approve any proposed development plan. Existing allowed uses in the County pertaining to the raising or maintaining of livestock and agricultural operations; an exemption to MCC 6-3-10,Firearms,Dischargeable Instruments; and existing agreements for the collection of solid waste were allowed to remain and continue until such time as the properties redeveloped in the future. With the proposed development,these uses are required to cease. The existing DA's require any property or easements needed by the City to provide any sewer or water infrastructure needed in furtherance of the agreement to be provided by the Owner at no cost to the City for the intent of providing for the advancement of sewer and water infrastructure for the benefit of the property,the City and adjacent properties for water mains, sewer mains and trunk lines. Because all of the water and sewer infrastructure commitments have been met and have been constructed,these provisions do not need to be carried over to the new DA. Staff recommends the proposed Master Plan is included in the new DA along with the provisions for future development listed in Section IX.A.1 to ensure compliance with the MU-C FLUM designation. expired.B. Annexation & Zoning(A.Z)a Anne*a4ion of Lot 4, Bleek 1 of Shafer-View Estates Subdivision eensisting of 40.09 aer-es of!and is proposed with an R 2 zoning distr-iet eensistent with the asseeiated FLUM desigaa�ien of LDR. This le be used as open spaee for-a period of not less than 15 years from the r-eeer-ding da4e of the plat;beeause the dwellings,No develepmefi4 is proposed at this time.Annexation is Fequested beea-use the easterly 10 aer-es of the lot is needed for-sewer-and aeeess to the proposed develapmen4; the remainder-of the pr-opefty is not proposed develop as paft of this pr-ejeet. Futtwe develepraea4 is required to eemply with the dimensional sta-adafds of the R 2 zoning distfiet. The Developer-plans to develop the property between the eolleetef stfeet and the adjoining ShafeF View Subdivision with 1 aer-e lots as a tFansition and buffer-to the existing neighbor-heed. Prior-to annexation of the property, a lot division should be approved by Ada County in order-for- the Applieant to only develop the eastern portion of the pr-opeFt-y.- The annexation area is within the Area of City impaet Betmdar-y(AQQ).A legal deser-iption for-the annexation area is ineluded in Seetion VIII.B. The City may r-equir-e a development agreement(DA) in eet��etien with an annexation ptwsttant to 1da Code seetion 67 651!A. Beeause the R 2 distr-iet only allows single family residential detaehed par-ks> nd > Staff does not feel it's neeessafy to r-estfiet development of the pr-epei4y dffettgh a DA Fef Page 12 Page 182 Item#5. C. Rezone(RZ): A rezone of 384.97 acres of land from the R-4 to the ,R-8 (144.78+ 119.28=264.06 acres),R-15 (76.93 acres)and C-C(43.28 acres)zoning districts is proposed. afea on the west side of the f4ffe eelleeter-stfeet depieted on t4e Master-Plan. Beeause this pr-epeAy is designated N4DR on the FLUM,the R 4 or R 8 zoning distriets would t�Tieally be the best zoning choices. annexed with R 2 zoning, Stag r-eeewumeads the adjaeent LDR design4ion is used for-the area proposed be rezoned as allowed in the Comprehensive Plan when deemed appropriate and approved as paft of-a publie hearing with a land development application(see pg. 3 9).No development is proposed at this time. Ftitefe development is FeEleir-ed to eempiywith the dimensional standards of the R 2 zoning distfiet liste in T T�nble112A 4 and-the allowed uses piste''�Table 11 2A 2. The areas proposed to be rezoned to R-8 consisting of a total of 264.06 acres are primarily designated on the FLUM as MDR but some of the area is within the MU-C designated area. The Master Plan does not depict a conceptual development plan for much of the R-8 zoned area except for that to the south of the C- C zoned area in Apex Southeast where single-family detached homes are proposed at a gross density of 3.75 units/acre. Because this area is in close proximity to a major transportation/mobility corridor (E.Lake Hazel Rd.) and a City Park, a higher density in this area is encouraged. The 76.93 acre areas proposed to be rezoned to R-15 lie within areas designated as MDR,MHDR and MU-C on the FLUM. The Master Plan does not include a conceptual development plan for the portion in the MHDR designated area. To ensure future development occurs consistent with the guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan for MHDR designated areas, Staff recommends a DA provision requiring future development to incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place; an alternative housing type such as townhomes and/or multi- family is recommended.Connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways, attractive landscaping and project identity should also be provided.The majority of the remainder of the R-15 area is designated MU-C with a small portion designated MDR.Alley-loaded single-family attached and detached homes are depicted on the Master Plan in the MDR and MU-C designated areas included in the Apex Northwest plat at the northwest corner of Locust Grove/Lake Hazel Roads in accord with the Comprehensive Plan. A concept development plan is not proposed for the remainder of the area proposed to be zoned R-15 north of the commercial area in Apex Northwest, on the south side of Lake Hazel and on the east side of Locust Grove in the MU-C designated area. To ensure these areas develop consistent with the general Mixed Use and MU-C guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan, Staff recommends the DA is amended prior to development of these areas to include a conceptual development plan. Future development should comply with the dimensional standards of the R-15 district listed in UDC Table 11- 2A-7,the allowed uses for the R-15 district listed in UDC Table 11-2A-2, and the general guidelines for Mixed Use developments and specifically MU-C designated areas in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed rezone of 43.28 acres of land to the C-C zoning district is consistent with the associated FLUM designation of MU-C. The area at the northwest corner of Locust Grove and Lake Hazel Roads is proposed to develop with a mix of neighborhood-serving commercial and office uses including a community center and amphitheater; and the area on the south side of Lake Hazel,east of the Locust Grove/Lake Hazel intersection is proposed to develop with a charter school as depicted on the Master Plan. A conceptual development plan is not proposed for the MU-C designated areas at the southwest, southeast and northeast corners of the intersection. To ensure these areas develop consistent with the general Mixed Use and MU-C guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan, Staff recommends the DA is amended prior to development of these areas to include a conceptual development plan consistent with these guidelines. Page 13 Page 183 Item#5. The Murgoitio property(Parcel#S1406110110)located southwest of the E.Lake Hazel/S.Locust Grove Rd.intersection shown as an"NAP"should be included in a future subdivision of the surrounding property(Parcel#S1406110350 or#S1406110015)in order to establish a legal division of land. Or,if a parcel division was approved by Ada County for the current configuration of the property,proof of such should be submitted to the Planning Division with a future subdivision application for the surrounding property. Legal deser-iptionswith asseeiated e*hibit maps of the areas proposed to be rezoned are ineluded in land thftt is PfiFt Of the annexation request, Staff has requested the Applicant revise the deseFip&H to exelude that area; a revised legal description and exhibit map should be submitted pr-i-OF tO the City Couneil hearing. The City may require a development agreement(DA)in conjunction with a rezone pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. Because a new DA is proposed to replace the existing DA's Staff recommends the above recommended DA provisions are included in that agreement. D. Preliminary Plats: Two separate preliminary plats,Apex Northwest and Apex Southeast,are proposed due to ACHD right-of- way(ROW) for Lake Hazel and Locust Grove Roads separating the properties. Because this overall project will be developed as a single integrated project and marketed as such, analysis of both projects is included in this report. Apex Northwest consists of 120 single-family residential buildable lots for the development of 88 detached and 32 attached dwelling units, 11 commercial buildable lots and 14 common lots on 41.75 acres of land in the C-C and R-15 zoning districts. The minimum lot size proposed is 2,863 square feet(s.£)with an average lot size of 3,885 s.f. The gross density proposed is 5.62 units/acre with a net density of 11.21 units/acre. The subdivision is proposed to develop in 3 phases as shown on the Phasing Plan in Section VIII.D. Apex Southeast consists of 237 single-family residential buildable lots,2 commercial buildable lots, 30 common lots and 10 other(shared driveway) lots on 81.63 acres of land in the C-C and R-8 zoning districts. The minimum lot size proposed is 4,840 square feet(s.f.)with an average lot size of 7,058 s.f. The gross density proposed is 3.75 units/acre with a net density of 6.17 units/acre. The subdivision is proposed to develop in three(5)phases as shown on the phasing plan in Section VIII.D. Overall,a total of 357 single-family residential buildable lots, 13 commercial buildable lots,44 common lots and 10 other lots are proposed between the two subdivisions at a gross overall density of 4.22 units/acre and a net overall density of 7.27 units/acre. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There are no existing structures within the boundaries of the proposed plats. The Northwest Williams Gas Pipeline crosses the northeast corners of Apex Northwest(Lot 2,Block 6) and Southeast(Lot 1,Block 9 and Lot 1,Block 14)subdivisions as depicted on the preliminary plats. Development within this area should comply with the Williams Developers' Handbook.No structures should be located within the easement. Proposed Use Analysis: The proposed single-family detached and attached dwellings are listed as a principal permitted use in the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts; and an education institution is listed as a conditional use in the R-8 zoning district per UDC Table 11-2A-2, subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-14. An education institution and professional service(i.e. office) is listed as a principal permitted use in the C-C Page 14 Page 184 Item#5. district, subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-14; other allowed uses in the C-C district are listed in UDC Table 11-213-2. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): Development of the subject property is required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district, 11-2A-7 for the R-15 district and 11-213-3 for the C-C district. Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards(UDC 11-6C-3) Development of the subdivision is required to comply with the subdivision design and improvement standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3, including but not limited to streets, alleys, common driveways, easements and block face. The proposed lots in Apex Northwest are consistent with the dimensional standards of the R-15 and C-C zoning districts. However,one of the alleys is not designed so that the entire length is visible from a public street as required by UDC 11-6C-3B.5e;the plat should be revised to comply.Common driveways that comply with the standards in UDC 11-6C-3D may be considered as an alternative. The proposed lots in Apex Southeast are consistent with the dimensional standards of the C-C and R-8 zoning districts. Two(2) alleys and 10 common driveways are proposed in the residential portion of the development that are consistent with the standards in UDC 11-6C-3. Such alleys and common driveways should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-313.5 and 11-6C-3D. A perpetual ingress/egress easement is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder for the common driveways,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. An exhibit should be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks,fencing,building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via the common driveway; if a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street,the driveway should be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway. Address signage should be provided at the public street for homes accessed via common driveways for emergency wayfinding purposes. Access(UDC 11-3A-3) Access is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-3. Apex Northwest: Two(2)public street accesses are proposed via E. Lake Hazel Rd., an arterial street, and two (2)public street accesses are proposed via S. Locust Grove Rd., an arterial street. Collector streets(E. Crescendo St. and S.Apex Ave.)are proposed in accord with the MSM. Apex Southeast: Three(3)public street accesses are proposed via S. Locust Grove Rd., an arterial street, and two(2)public street accesses are proposed via E.Lake Hazel Rd., an arterial street. Collector streets (E. Tower St., S.Vertex Way and E. Via Roberto St.)are proposed in accord with the MSM. Alleys are proposed for access to alley-loaded homes in Apex Northwest and Apex Southeast. Common driveways are proposed for access to certain homes in Apex Southeast. Cross-access easements should be provided between all commercial lots in the subdivisions as set forth in UDC 11-3A-3A.2. Road Improvements: The Applicant has proposed to enter into a Cooperative Development Agreement (CDA)with ACHD to improve Lake Hazel Road abutting the site with(4) 11.5' wide travel lanes, a 19' wide center landscape median,vertical curb, gutter, 8' wide planter strips and 10' wide detached concrete sidewalks within 109' to 120. 5' of right-of-way(ROW)with the first phase of development. The Applicant has proposed to construct dedicated right-turn lanes on Lake Hazel Rd. at Aspiration Ave.,Apex Ave.,Peak Ave. and Vertex Way. Locust Grove Rd. abutting the site is proposed to be improved with(3) 12' wide travel lanes with 6.5' wide bike lanes,vertical curb, gutter, 8' wide planter strips and 5' wide Page 15 Page 185 Item#5. detached concrete sidewalks within 77' of ROW. The specific conditions of approval pertaining to the CDA are included in the ACHD report in Section IX.H. Parking(UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family detached dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. Future development should comply with these standards. Parking for non-residential uses is required per the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-6B.1. Pathways(UDC 11-3A-8): The Pathways Master Plan(PMP)depicts segments of the City's multi-use pathway system in the linear area where the Williams gas pipeline is located and along the east boundary of the rezone area. Pathways should be provided with development in accord with the PMP per the conditions from the Park's Dept. in Section IX.E. All pathways shall be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8 and the Pathways Master Plan.Landscaping shall be provided along either side of the pathway in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-12C.Public pedestrian easements(14-feet wide) should be provided prior to signature by the City Engineer on final plat phases in which pathways are located. Staff recommends two(2) additional micro-path connections are provided in Apex Southeast at the east boundary to Discovery Park. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-1 : The UDC(11-3A-17)requires, at a minimum, detached sidewalks to be provided along arterial and collector streets and attached sidewalk to be provided along local streets. Detached sidewalks are proposed along all internal local and collector streets and along the arterial streets in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-17): Eight-foot wide parkways are proposed adjacent to all streets with detached sidewalks; all parkways are required to be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): A 25-foot wide street buffer is required adjacent to S. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Lake Hazel Rd.,both arterial streets; and a 20-foot wide street buffer is required adjacent to E. Crescendo St., S. Apex Ave., E. Tower St., S.Vertex Way and E. Via Roberto St., all collector streets,landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-313-7C.Alternative Compliance may be requested to UDC 11-3B-7C.2a for street buffers along collector streets to be located in a dedicated buffer rather than in a common lot. Parkways are required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17 and 11-3B- 7C. Landscaping is required along all pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C as discussed above. Common open space is required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3E. Mitigation is required for any existing trees proposed to be removed from the site as set forth in UDC I I- 3B-10.C.5. If the unimproved right-of-way is 10 feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line,the Developer is required to maintain a 10 foot compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of ACHD and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.5.A license agreement for improvements within the right-of-way is required between the property owner and ACHD. Page 16 Page 186 Item#5. Qualified Open Space(UDC 11-3 : A minimum of 10%qualified open space meeting the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B is required to be provided with development of land in residential districts. Based on the residential portion of the Apex Northwest plat(31.52 acres) zoned R-15, a minimum of 3.15 acres of qualified open space is required to be provided. Qualified open space consists of all of the street buffers along collector streets,half of the street buffers along arterial streets,the 8-foot wide parkways between the curb and detached sidewalk, linear open space at least 20' wide and up to 50' wide that has an access at each end, and open grassy areas of at least 50' x 100' in area. Although an open space exhibit was submitted that appears to meet the minimum standards,it includes areas in the C-C zoning district that do not qualify toward the minimum requirements for the subdivision. Staff recommends the exhibit is revised prior to the Council hearing to only depict areas that qualify per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B in order to ensure consistency with this standard.If additional qualified open space is needed,the plat should be revised to comply. Based on the residential area of the Apex Southeast plat(63.18 acres)zoned R-8, a minimum of 6.32 acres of qualified open space is required to be provided. Qualified open space consists of all of the street buffers along collector streets,half of the street buffers along arterial streets,the 8-foot wide parkways between the curb and detached sidewalk, linear open space at least 20' wide and up to 50' wide that has an access at each end, and open grassy areas of at least 50' x 100' in area. Although an open space exhibit was submitted that appears to comply with the minimum standards,it includes areas in the C-C zoning district that do not qualify toward the minimum requirements for the subdivision. Staff recommends the exhibit is revised prior to the Council hearing to only depict areas that qualify per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B to ensure consistency with this standard. If additional qualified open space is needed,the plat should be revised to comply. Qualified Site Amenities(UDC 11-3 . A minimum of one(1) qualified site amenity is required for each 20 acres of land to be developed in residential districts as set forth in UDC 11-3G-3. Based on the area of the residential portion of Apex Northwest(31.52 acres), a minimum of one (1) qualified site amenity is required to be provided. A gazebo is proposed as an amenity in Lot 32,Block 5 as an amenity; Staff recommends tables and benches are also provided as required for a"picnic area" amenity.A community center and amphitheater are also proposed as public amenities in the adjacent commercial portion of the development and a swimming pool is depicted on the Master Plan off-site on the adjacent property to the north; however, these do not qualify as amenities for the residential portion of the development proposed to be platted with this application. Based on the residential area of the Apex Southeast plat(63.18 acres)zoned R-8, a minimum of three(3) qualified site amenities are required to be provided. A swimming pool and children's play equipment are proposed in a central common area and pedestrian pathways(multi-use pathway along E.Lake Hazel Rd. and internal pathways)are proposed as amenities in this development in accord with UDC standards.A detail of the children's play equipment should be submitted with the final plat application. Waterways(UDC 11-3A-dy"j: There are no waterways within the boundary of the preliminary plats. The Farr Lateral runs along the north and east boundaries;the McBirney Lateral crosses the site east/west; and another waterway runs north/south through the annexation and/or rezone areas. Fencing(UDC 11-3A- : All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6C and 11-3A-7. Fencing is proposed as shown on the landscape plan. Page 17 Page 187 Item#5. Six-foot tall wood picket fencing is proposed along end caps at the ends of residential lots adjacent to common areas; and 5-foot tall clear vision metal fencing is proposed adjacent to internal common areas. Storm Drainage: An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction is required to follow Best Management Practice as adopted by the City. Irrigation: Underground,pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided for each and every lot within the development in accord with MCC 9-1,Water Use and Service. Irrigation water will be provided from Boise Project Board of Control. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): The Applicant submitted several perspective building elevations for the proposed single-family homes and for the commercial structures planned to be constructed in this development which are included in Section VIII.G. Homes depicted are a mix of 1-and 2-story units, attached and detached,with building materials consisting of a variety of siding styles and stucco with stone/brick veneer accents.Final design is required to comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual, single-family detached dwellings are exempt from design review standards. Because 2-story home elevations that face arterial and collector streets are highly visible, Staff recommends as a provision of the DA that the rear and/or side of structures on lots that face E.Lake Hazel Rd. and S.Locust Grove Road,arterial streets, and S.Vertex Way,E. Tower St.,E. Crescendo St., S.Apex Ave. and E.Via Roberto St.,collector streets,shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation (e.g.projections,recesses,step-backs, pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street.Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted and approved prior to submittal of any building permit applications for the swimming pool facility and non- residential/commercial structures. A Design Review application is required to be submitted for single- family attached units; one application can be submitted for the overall development if desired. Design review is not required for single-family detached homes. VII. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed MDA,AZ,RZ and PP applications with the requirement of a new Development Agreement with the provisions noted in Section IX.A per the Findings in Section X. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on July 9, 2020. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject MDA, RZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Jon Wardle b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Stacia Morgan; Annette Alonzo representing the Southern Rim Coalition d. Written testimony: Julie Edwards e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s) testimony a. Opposed to the proposed rezone from R-4 to R-15 for the land along Lake Hazel Rd. between Meridian Rd. &Locust Grove Rd. (not against ,gher density around Page 18 Page 188 Item#5. commercial areas);would like to see the zoning of the"future development"areas remain R-4 rather than be rezoned to R-8;belief that farm land and open space should be preserved as much as possible; concern that current school system does not have the capacity to accommodate all of the students from this development;would like a moratorium placed on development that has not already been approved to allow time for the school district and roads to catch up and to have time to re-evaluate how we want to use our dwindling remaining open spaces&farmland. b. Concern pertainingto o capacity of area schools and ability to accommodate more students from this development; c. Would like pathway provided to Black Rock Subdivision for connectivity. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. Concern pertainingto o capacity of area schools and impact of the proposed development on such, b. Supportive of proposed development, community amenities and associated improvements to Locust Grove and Lake Hazel Roads; 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. If revised qualified open space exhibit depicts qualified area less than 10%that the amphitheater in the commercial area be allowed to count toward the requirement through an alternative compliance request to UDC 11-3A-3. 5. Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: a. None Note: The annexation request was pulled from the Commission agenda at the request of the property owner so that it could be re-noticed with a change in zoning from R-2 to R-4. Therefore, it is not moving forward to Council with the MDA, RZ&PP applications. C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on August 11.2020. At the public hearing.the Council moved to approve the subject MDA, RZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Jon Wardle and David Turnbull,Brighton Corporation b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Chris Loveland,Marcella White,Julie Edwards d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: Joe Bon ig orno 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Not in favor of the proposed rezone from the R-4 district and density and lot sizes of the proposed development—preference for larger estate lots(1+acre)and open space. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Phasing of the preliminary plats; b. The uniqueness of the development with community amenities- C. Development is proactive in addressing traffic/infrastructure concerns up front; and, d. Concern about education issue and overcrowding of area schools. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation. a. None Page 19 Page 189 Item#5. VIII. EXHIBITS A. Master Plan (Revised) t 1 a Y 2 iIIAIFE •� LFYRLOP1Bd i_ r. t c AREA EXCLUDED BY tit AUGUST 11,2020 CITY COUNCILAPPROVAL; r SUBIECTT❑FUTURE APPLCATEONS. ti oCKiP+IEM I EI(h/F I NICFiOCr- j -4 II k lulus I z 1� 1 ti ELMEHJ2F.W. _-_--IBM 1 _ 1 N •I 1 1 ! k s 4 _I— V 1 I _ - 1 - I i }I � 1 FJTI 1 / M•T1.tPlr:ri1 X i 1 I C c CONCEFTURL.WEVECTT9 CHANGE _ AUGUST 18,2U20 r Page 20 Page 190 Item#5. B. Annexation Legal Deser-iption & Exhibit MV Page 21 Page 191 Item#5. C. Rezone Legal Description & Exhibit Map r I E_AMITY RD_ � - - + 1 NAP Lu .• R-8 RA - - - :7zzzm- APEX NORTHWEST SUBDIVISION PRE-PLAT IIpuu R-15 IrTm — C-C E.LAKE HAZEL Rt)_ III NAP w J 3 = APEX SOUTHEAST SUBDIVISION PRE-PLAT 0 1000 2000 3000 km Plan Scale:1'=1000' E N G I N E E R I M G 9M NEST snare STRM eas[inAH0Ea7Ls PHONE 321WI E39E939 APE(SU B DI VISI O N k njilp— MERIDIAN,IDAHO DATE: AUGUSTZMD PRUI ECT: 21HX7 SHEET_ OVERALL PROJECT VICINITY MAP 1 OF 1 Page 22 Page 192 Item#5. km 9233 WEST STATE STREET I BOISE,ID 837'14 1 208.639,6939 1 FAX 208.639.5930 April 2,2020 Project No.2M17 Exhibit A Legal Description for Rezone to R-8-North Apex Subdivision A portion of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4,a portion of the Southeast 1/4 and a portion of the Northeast 114 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 31,Township 3 North, Range 1 East, B.M., City of Merldian,Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Center of said Section 31,thence following the northerly line of said Southeast 1/4 of Section 31, N89"57'56"E a distance of 2,601-37 feet to a brass cap marking the East 114 corner of said Section 31; Thence leaving said northerly line and following the easterly line of said Southeast 1/4,500"32'22NE a distance of 1,419.94 feet; Thence leaving said easterly Iiae,N89°42'21"W a distance of 1,423.17 feet; Thence 500°16'52"W a distance of SMOG feet; Thence NS9°42'2VW a distance of 1,1.98-50 feet to the westerly line of said Southeast 1/4; Thence following said westerly line, N00°16'52"E a distance of 682.44 feet to the Center-South 1f 15 corner of said Section 31; Thence leaving said westerly line,SS9-52'0S"E a distance of 62.50 feet; Thence NOW 16'52"E a distance of 895.00 feet; Thence 199.42 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 280M feet, a delta angle of 40"48'25",a chord bearing of N20°07`2O"W and a chord distance of 195.23 feet; Thence N40"31'33"W a distance of 241-33 feet; Thence 198.79 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 230.00 feet, a delta angle of 49'31'13", a chord bearing of N65"17'09"W and a chord distance of 192.66 feet to the southerly tine of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 31; Thence fallowing said southerly line,S89'57'15"W a distance of 980.26 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Center-West 1/16 corner of saGd Section 31; Thence Leaving said southerly line a nd fo Vow!ng the westerly line of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4, NOO"25'36"E a distance of 1,558.66 feet; Thence leaving said westerly line, N81°55'55"E a distance of 518.76 feet; Thence 56.28 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 58.00 feet,a delta angle of 55"35'50",a chord bearing of 520°49'52"E and a chord distance of 54.10 fleet; Thence 546°52M"E a distance of 45.40 feet; Thence 554'18'10"E a distance of 180.18 feet; Thence 16 1.54 feet along the arc of a circular cu rve to the left,said curve having a radius of 588.00 feet, a delta angle of 15"44'26",a chord bearing of 562°10'23"E and a chord distance of 161.03 feet; Thence S70°02036"E a distance of 107-80feet; Thence S19'57'24"W a distance of 12.00 feet; Thence 570°02'36"E a distance of 14.45 feet; Thence SEW58'05"l;a distance of 207.13 feet; Thence S65a32'50"E a distance of 188.57 feet to the easterly line of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4; Page 23 Page 193 Item#5. Thence following said easterly fine,50O°39'17"W a distance of 1,140.13 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 144.79 acres, more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit 9 and by this reference is hereby made a part of, NIL Is 12459 4,17 L. BN rr. � SSr�"C�'�* HUM I/4 MWER s� N% 31�xR6G38'17� � vV ZCa 9RhBS UP ru c °S Y Er3T 1!1 'O0"40 Ey # SECTION 31 w FQNT OF BEG!hNNG § p :3 6/6+INCH RM4R Ili W 3/'� CEP cc E:ERTpt OF SEC170W 31 9►SI or 9EJYi21kv Qu y{ QN.29' NW57'5Er 2ICL 601.37 ST75r FAO#o2 31 m Q r �ALWIFUM CAP +� *UT 1/d CNNE C 5whok 11 N4jr31'53-w 'G 20.33' Rezone Area: 144-78t AC- All pF 5113124�454a&punbn of R7&Z422CWJ r W S113143720DS1181438400 SL511314172SI � �s4 Current Zoniri -RUT&R'4 # . I PropoSLd Zoning:R-8 g h.1`e. wkex� #R116.'1 COST - — — — — — — F — — — — — — — — SHEET: 6�9-NCH i R 1 +✓8��231'4 1#g3 t7' l F C-s 1/10 CORNER f Z n iy OF 9ECRIN 31 e g m I r�EP+Y�1`rr 101.156' ` I /y ��/��yy,��II n�ya�yy V 3013 6011 I V G`4FGYfGM` 7UhT i 'i.�tik.i> 4197 YR}I 71011 lr+Lk I SCALE- I'�hEQQ' '11 m!1 16, Page 24 Page 194 Item#5. kin 9233 WEST STATE STREET I BOISE,ID 83714 I 208,639,b934 I PAX 208-M-6930 APr[I Z,2020 Project No-2"17 UhlbitA Legal 17esoription fur Rezone to R$-South ApexSubdlwi$1an A parcel of land situated in a portion of the West 1f 2 of the Fforthwe5t 1/4 of Section 5 and a portiori of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 5,Township 2 North, Range 1 East 0.M-,City Qf Meridian, Ada County,Idaho and heing more particularly described as foilows: Commen Ceing at a brass cap rnaricl ng the co rner cam more to Sections 5 anti 6,Township 2 No rth,Ra nge 1 East and Sectons 31 artd 32,Townsh ip 3 North, Range 1 Ea st which bears S89"42'2I'E a dicta nce of 2,640.00 feet from a 5f8-Inch rebar marking the#forth 1f4 corner of said Section 6,thence following the easterly line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Se€tian 6,S00$04'351E a distance 4661-39 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence teaving said easterly lin€,N89°53`42"€a diSta nCe of 966.03 Feet; Thence W1'51'13"E a distance of 547-17 feet W the easterly Ilne of said West 1{2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5; Thence following said easterly line.SO4'01'43°E a distanceof,1,423.96feel to the Center-Wiest 1/16 earner of said Section 5, Thence leaving said easterly line and followng the southerly line of Bald Vilest 1f 2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5,N89°52'3$"W a KWtOACe Of 1r329.65 fee tto a bras tap marking the West 1}4€ornerof said Section 5(East 1/4 corner of saF1 Section 6); Thence laavlrog said southerly line of the West 1 f2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5 a rid fallowing the southerly line of said East 112 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 6,N89°22'50"W a distance of 1304-25 feet; Thence leaving said southerly Liner N00`43'55`W a distance Of 111-26 feet; The nre N00°2.t}'23`W a distance of5 9.25 feet; Thence N97134'26"tin+a distance of 1149 feet to the westerly line of said East 1{3 of the Northeast T 4 of Section 6; The nee following said westerly Ene,Pt00'02'46"W a distance of 66,73 feet to the westerly rfgltt-cf-way line of the Rawson Cana]; Thence leaving said westerly lm-a and followl rig said westerly right-of-way Iine the followingcourses: 1, N78"25'55"E a distance of 161.21 Feet; 2, N54'55'20"E a distance of 74,17 feet; 3. N31°51'12"E a distance of 92.01 feet 4, N10'2S'1D"Ea distance of381,33feeti 5- N05°26'52oW a distance of 105,26 feet; 6- N18'56'2W)JV a distance of 287.65 feet; 7. N32'CG'38"W a distance of 91.83 feet; B. N61432'57"W a distance of 104.61 feet; 9- N74'59'05"Yy a dlstanoe of 44M feet,- Thence Leaving said westerly right-of-way line, NOO°02'06"1N a distance of 396.78 feet; ENGiNEEl{S I SURVEYORS PLANNERS Page 25 Page 195 Item#5. Thence SB9°42'20"E a distance ckf 796.96 feet; Thence 504*&4'35"r a dlstarice of 252.00feet; Thence 589'42'20"E a distance DI`473.4i7 feet to the easterly line of said East V2 of the Northeast V4 of Section 45{westerly I ine of said WoGt 1/2 of the Northwest 1{4 of 5ectia n 5}; Thence following sold easterly nine(and said westerly line), N0G'44'35'W a dlstanceof$4.63 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Sald parcel contains a total of 119.28 acres,more pr less. Attached hereto is Exhlblt 6 and by this refereow is hereby made a part of. 12459 •2,0 3,0 PAGE 2 Page 26 Page 196 Item#5. BASIS OF BEARING ri o 31 9'42'21"E 2640.00' E 1AKE HAZEL RD 31 32 T.3N.. RA E. n 6 5 T.ZN., R.1 E. 5 8-INCH REBAR POINT OF COMMENCEMENT I s/e-INCH REeAR BRASS CAP WEST 1/16 CORNER T -c -0 -c NORTH 1/4 CORNER NW CORNER SECTION 5 -2 SECTION 5 AND stCncN 6 NE CORNER SECTION 6 �' SECTION 32 a x� O iv t�7 a m c � `n I POINT OF S89'42'20"E 796.96' a 6EGINNING O , N89'53'42"E 965.03' 4- V) o 589'42'20"E L11 L9 473.40' LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE QXj 3 (8 CL 1= a Rezone Area: 119.28t AC. Ll N8734'26"W 13.49 m < z u N15'56'20"W Portion of 51406110015, 2B7.65' L2 NO'02'08"W 66.73 ± c All of 51406110350 and m o a Portion of S1445212410 L3 N78'25'55"E 161.21 0 s � � Current Zoning:R-4 L4 N54TM'20"E 74.17 N LU Proposed Zoning:R-8 c _ L5 N31'51'12"E 92.61 LU iO ^ Iti L6 0'28'52V 106.26 Z N o5v M L7 N32'08'38'W 91.83 W� L8 N61'32'57"W 104.61 �' MpRCH39I9 L4 h N T�I r PaaEt7. 20-D17 Ln 1�' o Ln L9 N74'59'05"W 44.02 SHEEP Ll o 0 LIG SO'04'35"E 252.00 1 OF 1 u' L1 i N704'35"W 84.63 NOO'20'23-W 549.25' L12 N59'22'50"W 17.75 I D 20❑ 4�❑ Boo BRASS CAP i W 1/4 CORNER SECTION 5 1/2-INCH REBAR SCALE: 1"-4d0' E 1/4 CORNER SECTION 6 EEMMEIon C-E 1/16 CORNER N0O'43'55"W C-W 1/16 CORNER ENGWEEkS.SukVEYORS_PIANNERS SECTION 6 111.26' SECION 9F33 WE5TSTATESrREEf N89'22'50"14 1304,25' 6 5 N89'52'38"W 1329.65' 9043E IQ4HO B3714 L12 RnxH Im91$c�9 63�039 Page 27 Page 197 Item#5. km 9233 WEST STATE STREET I BDISE,ID 83714 1 208.639.6939 l FAX 20&639.6930 April 29,2020 Project No,20-017 Exhibit A Legal Description for Rezone to R-15 Apex 5ubdivi5ion A parcel of land situated in a portion of the South 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 31 and a portion of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32,Township 3 North,Range 1 East,B.M.,and a portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 6,Township 2 North, Range 1 East B.M.,al I situated in the City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho anti heing more particularly described as follows- BEGINNING at a 5/8-Inch rebar marking the corner common to Section 31,Township 3 North,Range 1 East,and Section 6,Township 2 North,Range 1 East,which bears N89°42'21"E a distance of 2,640.00 feet from a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Southeast 1/4 corner of said Section 31; Thence following the westerly line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 31,N00°16'52"E a distance of 660.00 feet; Thence leaving said westerly line,589°42'21"E a distance of 1,198.50 fleet; Thence N40"15'52"E a distance of G20.00 feet; Thence 589°42'21"E a distance of 1,971.82 feet to the easterly boundary of the Farr Lateral; Thence following said easterly boundary the following courses: 1. 64.48 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve hawing a radius of 110.00 feet,a delta angle of 33°35'03",a chard hearing of 505°50'15"W and a chord distance of 63.55 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 2. 51ti`57'45"E a distance of 410.17 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 3. 114.95 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 140.00 feet, a delta angie of 47"02'41",a chord bearing of S34*29'08"E and a chord distance of 111.75 feet to a 1/7-inch rebar, 4. S58'00'31"E a distance of 219.85 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 5. S69`55'45"E a distance of 503.32 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar on the easterly line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32; Thence following said easterly line,S00'10'02"E a distance of 430.90 feet to the southerly line of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32; Thence following said southerly line,N89'57'46"W a distance of 641.22 feet; Thence N00°06'18"W a distance of 124.99 feet; Thence N47°51'44"W a distance of 797.36 feet; Thence N89°42'21"W a distance of 775.42 feet; Thence 500°16'52"W a distance of 1,154.01 feet; Thence N89°42'2WW a distance of 587.77 feet; Thence N00°02'06"W a distance of 494.01 feet to the southerly line of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 31; Thence following said southerly line,NS9°42'2VW a distance of 10370,00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Page 28 Page 198 Item#5. Said parcel contains a total of 76.93 acres, more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is hereby Trade a part of. OF L >13 .7-41.so LEGEND FOUND BRASS CAP � � o/6-wcri Ri±o,uh A CALLI RJtrEIs FGW Ln y, REZONE B LWAff JL m 0 500 1000 1500 .a E7t1S11NG R%RC 1 Lw1E cc -- — =SECTION LINE Plan Seale.1"+500' 91 '' o CURVE TALE NAY€ PANA E.06WM OILTA I CHOBDBAG IW.-AD Cu 3 Ci 110.4D' 84,4v 33'35-G'v SS`S4'i5.w 63,5d' 14 C2 14f}_Ot}' 11493' 47-02'41` W2T05%' 11135- m C $M 42'21'E 197 t.62 LJJ s 3 i1 a z Reams Area_M.921 Ar. * z parkloe$7,131�36400,51733i#7 C O 5I1.3141775L,51133335E+90.A31+9fit3Ga15 CL✓rtnk 29f'"q'le-1 .ten Lr O $ fapoudZonir IF15 ;n SeLr32 s s i 5{I' 5SOd 3l'E 219 85' 775.42' NW-42'211R We +� Ss rtk Cr +rwmy�oc_ La } 2:r'lo�o'oI}'se�r MUS of BEARING s.ea' nf 3L 294L}_U6' T.W. R.1 E. 5 N99'#2'2114 137U_UD` ,ram+ T.7N., 12,7f. � 5 'S�'357'1 6+1. €LADE HAZEL Rd _ a FtMt OF EEMNING 3 89k%5 CAR km$E ccpm 5f8-INCF! RE9M 5 RICH OaM o a SECTION 31 71ESf 1 15 0 rFi SOUTH 1/4 CUfi?IER SECTION 3' v SE Ct�OH 5 AND 32 rkyidLEEar SuMYDAi t%�4R• 507.77' 1 &w tiiAe Mmr I� ��nwrG8575� NHBr#2'2{1'/l I nEdu tAr E'+bu W a7h aSaloava? Page 29 Page 199 Item#5. km 9233 WEST 5TA7E STREET I 8015E,Ip 83714 1 208,639.6939 1 FAX 208.639.6930 April 29,2020 Project No,20-017 Exhibit A Legal Description for Rezone to C-C Apex Subdivision A parcel of land situated in a portion of the southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 31,a portion of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32,Township 3 North, Range 1 East,13-K,and a portion of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5,and a portion of the Northeast 1/4❑f the Northeast 1/4 of Section 6, Township 2 North,Range 2 East S.M.,all situated in the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a brass cap marking the Northwest corner of Section 5, Township 2 North,Range 1 East, which hears N89'57'04"W a distance of 1,331.87 feet from a found 5/8-inch rebar marking the West 1/16 corner of said Sections 5 and 32; Thence following the northerly line of said Northwest 1/4,S89°57'04"E a distance of 690,66 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing along said northerly line,S89"57'04"E a distance of 541,21 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar marking the west 1116 corner of said Sections 5 and 32; Thence leaving said northerly line and following the easterly line of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 5,S00°01'43"E a distance of 250.92 feet to a point; Thence leaving said easterly line,S41"51'13"W a distance of 547,17 feet to a point; Thence S89°53'42"W a distance of 966.03 feet to a point on the westerly line of said Northwest 1/4; Thence following said westerly line,N00*04'35"W a distance of 167.37 feet to a point; Thence leaving said westerly line,N89°42'20"W a distance of 682.5E feet to a{point; Thence N00"16'52"E a distance of 1,154.01 feet to a point; Thence S89"42'21"E a distance of 775.42 feet to a paint; Thence S47*51'44"E a distance of 797.36 feet to a point; Thence S00°06'18"E a distance of 125.13 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 43.28 acres,more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is hereby made a part of. 12 597-0 Page 30 Page 200 Item#5. BRASS CAP 43 EA!r t/4 CGRNER ode =W.CTION 31 3� 31 � - e� � S&W4f21-E 775-4 d � q 0 3OU Goo goo U � o c 'r+"}. Plan$Celle;1"=36 O C g ' 4 �a POINT OF COMMENCEMENT $ SJ$ REBAR � X m W f411ND BRASS CAP i �pQpp'i� YYVf 1/14 CORNER ui m T FE' CORNER 59C110QN 31 12S,1S' SECTIONS S & 32 Q 31 — $69'42'21�E 31 3 T-RLLf g. 647 -6Q' _ SB9'57'G4'E 841.21` wI 6 m 254C1.D ' T,2N„ RJE 1331,87 L u E LA4E HAZEL RO $ PONT 15F peal»mmO 0AS15 OF BEARING *6 Z 258.92' w Rezoe Area:43.28±AC rn� Ponian o1 Sii]i41725f.StL3232SOM. Si4OS223MOD&SiaOfii�Wi ,� 4 [uncut AnhM:kh I Q Peobc"i�!Milt.L-L nary h'�i�'i26 Ne4 'x014 92.58' NOi!0�'3s YI k SHEET: �xn* 157,37' 59B'6S'42� 06�.0.3' � LCCE 'b I FOUND URASS CAP ID B/B-LNCH RE&W I 1 A WCIJ ATO PQINT RE.ZONE BOJACARY #YGwttfS.irbeHpo. iMwu!r ff Q EV571NC PAICEL LINE M'mq"um — — — —SE1;MN LIN>: iMaf Page 31 Page 201 .wY �I 3i �-r - Item#5. Northwest: APEX NORTHWEST SUBDIVOON PRELIMINARY PLAT A PORT1011QF 7HESDJFH IP43F THESIDUTHEAST V4AN0 HORTFffAT L14 OF THE !Oufi4CFSt 1f14F x0xm]LT rM!,M 3N0PTPL PIF+GC 1 r,*'?. {I7Y4F IAERIDPIL 19A COUNTY,IOMIO I KZL— F- wwa+w� Gi_ r - A �1 =1; Litz. I 3si X= ib 941 �:�- Fm_ ,, -11 Page 33 Page 203 Gm#3 ---- - -�--------—��-\ � �� - -- --�----------------�------- - - . . ... | - . — � - � ^� ( � 2 y I ■ • m . � .a PEW, ; I , . _ z2 � Y- , ! _ . | � 1f '_ ■ 7 � � 31E ' Imo ■ � � _. 9- _ . -1� r � . ) " y � ■ � } . T[\� lz� _ a, AL � . :�.�2._2 2_�..-- , M . - � = I I Page 34 �7m4 Item#5. Phasing Plan: APEX Northwest Phasing ConceprWf/Subject to Chan • 1 ID- - � 1 - ..,.+.+ ....�. : 1 —— F b I� l Southeast: APEX 5OLItHEA#t9UBMI51QH PRELIMINARY PLA7 — x�ro�u.exo srruxrte ix ire ncsr ir:a ixr.rwusrxo i va o gr•usrt s. v ra�r�+gku;�rr��s!ar.cvw saxau{xue miixir,i¢srn �S' _iL •K E k . .it —Sri- �• —. _ _ Page 35 Page 205 Eil �j I f *'Ol i h I I I � I � i .•�r I 4.r f A7. r�l! s it A t a 4 r�r � $ � •czTwaareJ-vr�=�� I i t g i �5 Y� I � •1lJ1::J •rJ 8 Page 36 Page 206 Item#5. AE ��. •--� � � .rug �� i _ _A i 2 1 a 4 4,i 2.lT so 2.12. � ��oaea9m�nc�waG. IWL .. I I I � � '•� - �. � � ,F2 i Page 37 Page 207 Item#5. Phasing Plan: APEX Southeast Phasing E.LARL I IAZL_RD. muMCkCMLIC{I COMMMaAL*C} D f AYFq TY �4 L Q 1 / � o ='- —1— —►� �' (-3) ID J Q d 4 a w — p ao E ;:� !5?+R:ST. � RESI�F7JilAL iR9il Gy E.STAGE Si. C, r3 ® ® f➢ Q1 ® ® ® Ci F3 E SPIRE ST: 0 0 0 s r t E 1NM.ErMMI fIUN'� l7 49 E.AMaJTION ST. 0 o e F.AMM..ST.. t-� E APWCE ST. p 9 — � fiS hl I 0 C7 � r � g ® 0 0 g E b] 9 � E.AbVENTURf ST. e v Page 38 Page 208 Item#5. E. Landscape Plan(date: 4/30/2020) Northwest: yj .C ` E�nera9tRimame— --— — - _ � "leer •r.�s�yea"�sris� �� s - tt3arars a -xs. 0 PPC 3,4 dy -nW 29 flu I aeoy,wa�n�m+a wo n.Axo rc-.a �. _ I Q14}7kL1 f4L'tl h�I.� 41IY.kT171CQ11 dCYi7 InwL7EeafESITEw.a�l ,o,w';�� a;� • I a:r •• •I IL�" 4E�.4]If+MRYT�AdMYU.I — HE�L.I.a ISW.4 k 7ie� 41 Page 39 Page 209 Item#5. ----- ---- — ------------ ------ IMIIMAP VlAh �E_ hNFCH LI7J! S:"u;k�w"l.? _ WITCH UIE-SEE 5NkE7 ak3,P ............... .................. ......ii...... ................. . .- r• 7tl ifs is i ''LF-13i-'� 't M1y F, . A0-. Page 40 Page 210 Item#5. Southeast: n�Ea�clu.nlunocp�� it � � �� -�'�� _� �---—�— -• - - - , �` r IL Qf�1�ALE711l6 P u!L + a: i PPL3.D PPL4.0 PP14.4 k� _T _y.�'- } ! � � ��_ �•�+Eov en l yam. S Y � o I r t}t - - rullr LY.. -.'!—.� ;ice _ •- -t S.,_'. __' mEa7.maeQEcxs nr. +� I I iE¢�YEIQEIIQ LJWCIiLAPCSffCRAN Ran EP 3QV fr^ iEL�.i__ r3_ Wes. '� - =mkt �-•�� — i#LS�Gl00YFR3 Page 41 Page 211 Item#5. � u i �.r I '�I I {ti°04f:3:##{io�i:ic{{off ---------YY'I I1},hSC/lf-0LadF IAAT4iM SAF SHEUE730 �/l� lrlr:+6'1 91WRW1 YapMIFEdir wwww wv..ilk.w_ro -, MAI I'll I IEJ-'IIE itIM t 92A ----- ____.___I: - ----- i ----- ___ ..�.. ��....� ...� �_ C§ W-.A- R�l- � .��.... Y .�.... • l�hI HCJIPk PLhN =��1�-�E3FEEfP119A ' x57d Page 42 Page 212 WAR H LGWI-SEE SHlrr PP3.0 P!, F, C•i -7Y X- R- ...... . ....... . 3 1 .... ... LMVDSCME PLAN Page 43 F. Qualified Open Space Exhibit(dated: Alareh May 2020) - REVISED Northwest: APEX NORTHWEST SUBDIVISION OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT U ... . .......- r---------------- - T AM hURTHWM 5UBWRDN Karm", krm I OF I Page 44 Item#5. Southeast: J + r x• - I� p �i 4 g �; - n'� - is •rr :erl ^ - tT _ _ I rm I d +� rm Ln rl y Re a x• y I c •- � � 1!s y: � IL V t 1 9 F z 5' m � m _ x - r - E Page 45 Page 215 G. Conceptual Building Elevations/Renderings YA Meh 445'Arr7e.�ic� .7iia'y 0 1 rim, Apex NW Aesl�enrJ� Alley TA MI ? _ - Apell�J W Rafl$M�4-Aaw AIYlK Apell SF'A esAdevlhaJ rartvrnhdnal r '. ,r A4�e3f��S1dGI1tIP1-�ORlY�210YIP1 T 1',�{F Y � � Page • •. 46 aFe�FFBrildenuol rar'enrianad leve,rSfHrefdentleJ-Cvmeziticrmt - ,-.r":�''•-: �.--i : SOMME IIIlku Ilk ,q�Nw commeic+d r�crx hf W ComrnerrJv� r. fix NW rammaxial .. Page 47 P' 7 t+� ti Page , i- 48 Item#5. H. Legal Description&Exhibit Map of Property Subject to New Development Agreement &am 9233 WEST 5fATE STREET I BOISE,ID 83714 1 208.639.6939 J FAk 208,639,6930 August 18,2020 Apex Subdivision Project No.2"17 Legal Description Exhibit A Legal Description for Apex subdivision A parcel of land situated in a portion of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4,all of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 31 and a portion of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32,Township 3 North,Range 1 East, B.M.,all of West 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 Section 5 and a portion of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 6,Township 2 North, Range 1 East 8-M.,all situated in the City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8-inch rebar markingthe Center 1/4 Section 31,Township 3 North,Range 1 East, B.M.,thence following the southerly line o€the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 31, S89°57'15"W a distance of 1,318.94 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Center-West 1/16 corner of said Section 31; Thence leaving said southerly line and following the westerly line of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4, N00"25'36"E a distance of 1,558.65 feet to a point; Thence leaving said westerly line,N81"55'55"E a distance of 518.76 feet to a point; Thence 56.28 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 58,00 feet,a delta angle of 55°35'50",a chord bearing of S20'49'52"E and a chord distance of 54.10 feet to a point; Thence 546°52'43"E a distance of 45.40 feet to a point; Thence 554°18'10"E a distance of 180.18 feet to a point; Thence 161.54 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 558,00 feet, a delta angle of 15'44'26",a chord bearing of$62°10'23"E and a chord distance of 161.03 feet to a point; Thence 570°02'36"E a distance of 107.90 feet to a point; Thence 519"57'24"W a distance of 12.00 feet to a point; Thence S70"02'36"E a distance of 14.45 feet to a point; Thence 551'58'05"E a distance of 207.13 feet to a point; Thence 555'32'50"E a distance of 188.57 feet to a point on the easterly line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 said Section 31; Thence following said easterly line,500"38'17"W a distance of 1,14D.13 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of43.744 acres,more or less. TOGETHER WITH: BEGINNING at 5/8-inch rebar marking the Center 1/4 Section 31,Township 3 North,Range 1 East,B.M., thence following the northerly line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 31, N89'57'56"E a distance of 2,601.37 feet to a brass cap marking the East 1/4 corner of said Section 31; Thence leaving said northerly line and Following easterly line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 31, 500"32'22"E a distance of 226.25 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar on the centerline of Farr Lateral; ENGINECRS I SURVEYORS I PLANNERS Page 49 Page 219 Item#5. Thence leaving said easterly line and following the centerline of said Farr Lateral the fallowing seven (7) courses: 1. S38"43'32"E a distance of 61.71 feet to a point; 2 S51"12'32"E a distance of 444.04 feet to a point; 3. SW36'10"E a distance of 272.66 feet to a point; 4. S86'04'31"E a distance of 206.22 feet to a point; 5. 573°45'13"E a distance of 301.51 feet to a point; S. 543'15'53"E a distance of 313.14 feet to a point; 7 S29°01'13"E a distance of 37.13 feet to a point on the easterly line of the West 112 of the Southwest 1/4 said Section 32; Thence leaving said centerline and following the easterly tine of the West 1/Z of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 32,500°08'25"E a distance of 206.12 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar on the easterly boundary of said Farr Lateral; Thence leaving said easterly lire and following the easterly boundary of said Farr Lateral the fallowing twelve(12)courses: 1. 22.57 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 144.57 feet,a delta angle of 08"56'24 ,a chord bearing of S56°50'40"W and a chord distance of 22.55 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 2. S5YM54"W a distance of 91.61 feat to a 1/2-inch rebar; 3. 122.47 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 220.00 feet, a delta angle of 31'5339",a chord bearing of 577'15'42"W and a chord distance of 120.89 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 4 N86°47'31"W a distance of 362.95 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 5. 583�47'06"W a distance of 26.72 feet to a 1/2-Inch rebar; fi 569"57'44"W a distance of 12&97 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 7. 90.59 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 110.00 feet,a delta angle of 47°20'30",a chord bearing of 546'18'02"W and a chord distance of 88.33 Beet to a point; S. 64.48 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 110.00 feet,a delta angle of 33935'03", a chord bearing of S05°50'15"W and chord distance of 63.56 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 9. S10°5745"E a distance of 410.17 feet to a V2-inch rebar; 10. 114,95 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 140.00 feel;,a delta angle of 4702'41", a chord bearing of 534°29'08"E and a chord distance of 111.75 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 11. S58"00'31"E a distance of 219.85 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 12. 569°55'45"E a distance of 503.32 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar on the easterly line of the West 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 of said Section 32; Thence leaving said easterly boundary and fallowing easterly line of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 2/4 of said Section 32,SWIM"E a distance of 431.17 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar common to Section 5,Township 2 North Range 1 East, B.M.,and Section 32,Township 3 North Range 1 East, B.M.; Thence leaving said easterly line and following the easterly line of the West 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 5,500°01'43"E a distance of 2,672.88 feet to the Center-West 1/16 corner of said Section 5; PAGE 12 Page 50 Page 220 Item#5. Thence leaving said easterly line and following the southerly line of the West 112 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 5,N89*W'38"1+V a distance of 1,329.65 feet to a brass cap common to Sections 5 and 6; Thence leaving said southerly line and following the southerly line of the East 112 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 6,N89"22'5WW a distance of 1,304.25 feet to a point; Thence leaving said southerly line,NOOa43'55"W a distance of 111.26 feet to a point; Thence lNDT20'23"W a distance of 549.25 feet to a point; Thence N87p3426"W a distance of 13.49 feet to the westerly line of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 6; Thence following the westerly line of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 6, N00°02'06"W a distance of 66.73 feet to a point on the westerly right-of-way line of the Rawson Canal; Thence leaving said westerly line and following the westerly right-of-way line of said Rawson Canal the following nine(9)courses: 1. N78`25'55"E a distance of 161.21 feet to a point; 2. N54°55'20"E a distance of 74.17 feet to a point; 3. N31"51'12"E a distance of 92.01 feet to a point; 4. 1\110"25'10"E a distance of 331.33 feet to a point; S. N05"26'52"W a distance of 105.26 feet to a point; 6. N18"56'20"W a distance of 287.65 feet to a paint; 7_ N32°08'38"W a distance of 91.83 feet to a point; 8. N61a32'57"W a distance of 104.61 feet to a point; 9. N7454'05"W a distance of 44.02 feet to a point; Thence leaving said westerly right-of--way line, N00'02'0Es'W a distance of 890.79 feet to a point on the northerly line of the}Northeast 1/4 of said Section 6; Thence following said northerly line,N8942'21"w a distance of 1,370,O0 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar common to Section 6,Township 2 North lunge I East,R-M., and Section 31,Township 3 North Range 1 East,B.M.; Thence leaving said northerly line and following the westerly line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 31, N00°16'52"E a distance of 1,342.44 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Center-South 1/16 cornerof said Section 31; Thence N00"16'52"E a distance of 1,342.44 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, Said parcel contains a total of 366.194 acres,more or less. Said description contains a total of 409.938 acres,more or less. 12 459 4 OF % PAGE 13 Page 51 Page 221 Item#5. S18.76 nSl°55'SS"� - r 'tT•wf�t8 rA• f 8 �s e W. x�f w rn w 3 � m sS9°57'15'w 1318.94 Title: Apex Subdivision Date: 08-17-2020 Scale: 1 inch=300 feet File: 200817 Apex Subdivision Legal 20-017 Tract 1: 43.744 Acres: 1905504 Sq Feet:Closure=s57.2522w 0.01 Feet Precision=1/627918: Perimeter 5510 Feel 001=s89.5715w 1318.94 006=s54.1810e 180.18 01 1—s61.5805e 207.13 002-n00.2534e 1558.66 a s��1 iei 03 0 1 2=s65.3250e 19337 003=01.5555e 518.76 008�S70A236e 107.80 013=00.3817w 1140.13 u61; R=5B160,n1!IVII3550 009=s 19.5724w 12.00 & 6_-0432�Chd�Sd.lD 005=A6.5243e 45A0 010==-7fl,0236e 14A5 Page 52 Page 222 Item#5. 1 2601.37 09°57'56"e f � v ni +e r O C � v a N ry _� � jJ SP3� n89°42'2I"w 137000 z3 �O 0 S.J log S f e.5 m v cv ri 4o r o N O 1 � n89°z2'S4'w a$4°52'3$"w 1304.25 1324.65 Tittle: Apex Subdivision Date. 08-18-2020 Scale; 1 inch= 1000 feet File:200817 Apex Subdivision Legal 20-017 Tract 1: 366.194 Acres: 15951396 5q Few:Clvsurt�s50.3758e 0.02 Feet Precis'tan>11999999: Perimettr= 19597 Fcet 001=n89.5756e 2601.37 016=s69.5744w 128.97 031=08.2555e 16L21 1)17:L.L R=I M19,0 odla 47 pw002= 00.3222e 226.26 tea ;a 032=n4.5S20e 74.17 nRN2wa n s5o003= 38,4332e 61.71 �d-63.56 033=01.5112e 92.01 004=s5I A 232e 444.04 019=sI0.5745e 410.17 034�n10.2510e 381.33 005=s60.3614e 272.66 I.aS oza;rile=lao.na o�: �.�a1 035= 05.2652w 106,26 e,Is�a.24osa c1a=l I 006-s86.043Ia 206.22 021=s58,003 le 219.85 036�nI8.5620w 287.65 007=s73,4513e 301.51 022-s69.5545e 503.32 037--T132.0838w 91.93 008=s43.1553e 313.74 023=500.1002e 431.17 038�n61.3257w 104.61 009,s29.0113e 37A3 024=sU0.0143e 2672.88 039=n74.5905w 44.02 010=s00.0825e 206-12 025�n89.5238w 1329.65 040-00,0206w$90.79 011:Rt R-144.67 UGI[Ia, 1a.56=4 026-n89.225Qw 1304.25 041=n89.42.21w 1370.00 Hog�56.5a40xr,4'1d°23.53 012=s61.1854w 91.61 027=n00-4355w 111.26 042=00.1652e [342.44 013:1;c R-224. Del[.-31.5339 028mn40.2023w 549.25 043�00.1652e 1342.44 014=n86.4731w 362.95 029--n87.3426w 13.49 015-s83.4746w 26.72 030� 00.020bw 66.73 Page 53 Page 223 Item#5. IX. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. The subject property shall no longer be subject to the terms of the existing Development Agreements (H-2015-0019: Brighton Investments,LLC—Inst. #2016-007072; SCS Brighton,LLC—Inst. #2016- 007073; Murgoitio Limited Partnership—Inst. #2016-007074)upon the property owner(s) entering into a new agreement. The new DA shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the City within six(6)months of City Council granting the subject modification. The new DA shall include the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the conceptual master plan, conceptual building elevations,preliminary plat,phasing plan,landscape plan, and qualified open space exhibits included in Section VIII and the provisions contained herein. b. Future preliminary plats shall include collector streets consistent with those shown on the Master Street Map, as required by Ada County Highway District. c. The land designated as Medium High-Density Residential(MHDR) on the Future Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan zoned R-15 shall develop with a variety of residential dwellings (i.e. single-family detached/attached,townhouses,condominiums,and/or apartments)at a gross density ranging from eight(8)to twelve(12)dwelling units per acre. Development shall incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place and shall incorporate connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways, attractive landscaping and a project identity consistent with the Comprehensive Plan(see pg. 3-10). d. Prior to development of the Mixed Use—Community(MU-C) designated areas shown on the Master Plan as"future development,"the Development Agreement shall be amended to include a conceptual development plan that demonstrates consistency with the general guidelines for Mixed Use developments and specifically the MU-C designation(see pgs. 3-13 and 3-15 thru 3-16). e. The rear and/or side of structures on lots that face E. Lake Hazel Rd. and S. Locust Grove Road, arterial streets, and S. Vertex Way,E. Tower St.,E. Crescendo St., S.Apex Ave. and E. Via Roberto St.,collector streets, shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches, balconies,material types,or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. f. Development within the Williams Pipeline easement shall comply with the Williams Developers' Handbook. g. All future development, except for single-family detached dwellings, is required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. h. The Murgoitio property(Parcel#S 1406110110)located southwest of the E. Lake Hazel/S. Locust Grove Road intersection shall be included in a future subdivision of the surrounding property (Parcel#S1406110350 or#S1406110015)in order to establish a legal division of land. Or,if a parcel division was approved by Ada County for the current configuration of the property,proof of such shall be submitted to the Planning Division with a future subdivision application for the surrounding property. i. The lot pfoposed to be afmexed(i.e. Lot > Bleek 1, fi*tufe de.'elopment; or-,the entire lot shall be ineitided in a f6ttffe subdivision. if a pr-epef�y Page 54 Page 224 Item#5. division is appr-eved by Ada Gou*ty,pf:eef of sueh shall be submiAed to the Plaffi"ing Division j. Multi-use pathways shall be provided with development as required by the Park's Department in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. k. The commercial(C-C zoned)portions of this development are allowed to obtain building permits prior to subdivision of the property. 2. The final plat submitted for Apex Northwest shall incorporate the following: a. Include a note stating direct lot access via E. Lake Hazel Rd., S. Locust Grove Rd., E. Crescendo St. and S. Apex Ave. is prohibited, except for those accesses approved by City of Meridian and Ada County Highway District. b. The north/south alley in Block 5 does not comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3B.5 as the entire length of the alley is not visible from a public street as required; common driveways may be considered as an alternative to the alley provided they meet the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D, subject to alternative compliance approval. c. Depict minimum 20-foot wide street buffers along E. Crescendo St. and S. Apex Ave., collector streets, in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.2. d. Cross-access easements shall be depicted between all commercial lots in the subdivisions in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A.2. 3. The final plat submitted for Apex Southeast shall incorporate the following revisions: a. Include a note stating direct lot access via E. Lake Hazel Rd., S. Locust Grove Rd., E. Tower St. S. Vertex Way and E.Via Roberto St. is prohibited, except for those accesses approved by City of Meridian and Ada County Highway District. b. Depict minimum 20-foot wide street buffers along E. Tower St., S.Vertex Way and E.Via Roberto St., collector streets, in accord with UDC 11-313-7C.2. c. Depict two(2)additional minimum 15-foot wide common lots for micro-path connections to Discovery Park at the east boundary in Block 14. d. Cross-access easements shall be depicted between all commercial lots in the subdivisions in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A.2. 4. The landscape plan submitted with the final plat application for Apex Northwest shall be revised as follows: a. Depict multi-use pathways in accord with the Pathways Master Plan as required by the Park's Dept. in Section IX.E. Landscaping shall be depicted along either side of the pathways as set forth in UDC 11-313-12C. b. Depict landscaping within all required street buffers along arterial and collector streets in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-7C. c. Include a calculations table listing the number of trees required vs. those proposed in common open space areas, street buffers,parkways, and along pathways that demonstrate compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3, 11-313-7C.3, 11-313-12C respectively. d. Include mitigation information for any existing trees proposed to be removed from the site in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-1OC.5. e. If the unimproved right-of-way is 10 feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line,the Developer is required to maintain a 10 foot compacted shoulder meeting the Page 55 Page 225 Item#5. construction standards of ACHD and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.5. A license agreement for improvements within the right-of-way is required between the property owner and ACHD. f. Depict a gazebo with tables and benches as an amenity in Lot 32,Block 5; include a detail of the gazebo. 5. The landscape plan submitted with the final plat application for Apex Southeast shall be revised as follows: a. Depict multi-use pathways in accord with the Pathways Master Plan as required by the Park's Dept. in Section IX.E. Landscaping shall be depicted along either side of the pathways as set forth in UDC 11-313-12C. b. Depict landscaping within all required street buffers along arterial and collector streets in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. c. Include a calculations table listing the number of trees required vs. those proposed in common open space areas, street buffers,parkways, and along pathways that demonstrate compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3, 11-313-7C.3, 11-313-12C respectively. d. Include mitigation information for any existing trees proposed to be removed from the site in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-1OC.5. e. If the unimproved right-of-way is 10 feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line,the Developer is required to maintain a 10 foot compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of ACHD and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.5. A license agreement for improvements within the right-of-way is required between the property owner and ACHD. f. Depict two(2)additional minimum 15-foot wide common lots with 5-foot wide micro-paths in Block 14 at the east boundary; depict landscaping on either side of the pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-12C. g. Depict the children's play equipment proposed in the central common area; include a detail of the play equipment. 6. Future development shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-6, 11-2A-7 and 11-2B-3 for the R-8,R-15 and C-C zoning districts respectively. 7. Off-street parking is required to be provided for residential uses in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 based on the number of bedrooms per unit; and for non-residential uses in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-613.1. 8. An exhibit shall be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks, fencing,building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via common driveways; if a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street,the driveway shall be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D. 9. Address signage shall be provided at the public street for homes accessed via common driveways for emergency wayfinding purposes. 10. A perpetual ingress/egress easement shall be filed with the Ada County Recorder for the common driveways,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D.8. A copy of said easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division with the final plat for City Engineer signature; or,this information may be included in a note on the face of the plat. Page 56 Page 226 Item#5. 11. A 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division for the 10-foot wide multi-use pathways proposed within the site that are not located within right-of-way,prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer for the phase in which they are located. 12. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted and approved prior to submittal of any building permit applications for the swimming pool facility in the residential portion of the development; and for all non-residential/commercial uses and structures.A Design Review application is required to be submitted for single-family attached units; one application can be submitted for the overall development if desired. 13. The qualified open spaee exhibits fOF the residentially zoned portions of Apex Northwest and Apex Southeast shall be revised prior to the Council hearing to only depiet areas that qualify PeF the standaFds listed in UDC 11 3G 3B.if additional qualified needed,the plat should be revised to eompl�- B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 The north-south sewer line in the landscaped area of Block 5 (Apex NW)needs to be moved east to the paved access road. 1.2 No sewer or water lines have been shown to the lots in Block 7 (Apex NW). Each lot will need to have services provided. 1.3 Public Work's preference is to see all water utilities in the public right-of-way(R-O-W),where they can easily be operated and maintained. If the utilities truly cannot be installed in the public right-of- way,then our preference would be for utilities to be located in a dedicated and improved alley. If that cannot be accomplished,the applicant should work with Public Works for further solutions that meet both the developer's design constraints and Public Works'maintenance needs. 1.4 This development will need to be modeled at final plat to verify each phase meets minimum fire flow pressures 1.5 From the preliminary geotechnical investigation of groundwater elevation provided in the application, it appears that groundwater may not be a factor with the development of this subdivision. The initial investigative report is dated April 8,2018, and additional data collection is recommended to confirm actual groundwater levels. Updated data and recommendations from a geotechnical professional shall be required with the submittal of construction design drawings. 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub- grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility,or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Page 57 Page 227 Item#5. Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x 11"map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B)for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals,or drains, exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)898- 5500 for inspections of disconnection of services.Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at(208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits for the residential portions of the development. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C- 3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. Page 58 Page 228 Item#5. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public works.aspx?id=272. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT Northwest: https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WeUink/Doc View.asp x?id=189722&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiiy&cr=1 Southeast: https://weblink.meridiancity.org WWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=189784&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCio! D. POLICE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancioy.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=190778&dbid=0&repo=Meridian CibX E. PARK's DEPARTMENT Northeast: https://weblink.meridianciU.or lWebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=191486&dbid=0&repo=MeridianQU Southeast: https://weblink.meridiancit .00rg/WeUink/Doc View.aspx?id=1914 8 7&db id=0&rep o=Meridia n City Page 59 Page 229 Item#5. F. WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT(WASD) https://weblink.meridianciN.ofg WWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=190290&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiU G. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO(COMPASS) Northwest: https://weblink.meridianciU.ofglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=190975&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiu Southeast: https://weblink.m eridia n c i ty.ory/WeUink/Doc View.aspx?id=19 09 7 7&db id=0&repo=Meridian City H. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) AZ/RZ: https://weblink.meridiancity.orQ/WebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=191226&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCioy Northwest: https://weblink.meridianciU.orglWebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=192784&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiU Southeast: https://weblink.meridianciU.orkIWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=192785&dbid=0&repo=Meridiancity I. BOISE PROJECT BOARD OF CONTROL(BPBC) https://weblink.meridianciU.org/WeUink/DocView.aspx?id=189951&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCitX J. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT(NMID) Northwest: https://weblink.meridianciU.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=190512&dbid=0&repo=Meridian CitX Southeast: https://weblink.meridiancitE.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=190510&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity K. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT Northwest: https://weblink.meridiancitE.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=190604&dbid=0&repo=Meridian CitX Southeast: https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.asp x?id=190605&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity L. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) https://weblink.meridiancioy.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=190598&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiU X. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. hi order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: Page 60 Page 230 Item#5. 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment to RL-2-,-R-8, R-15& C-C and proposed development is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan if the Applicant complies with the provisions in Section IX. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the proposed single-family attached and detached homes with front-loaded and alley-loaded options will contribute to the range of housing opportunities in the City; other residential types may be provided with future phases of development. The City Council finds the commercial portion of the property will provide for the retail and service needs of the community in accord with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment will not result in an adverse impact on the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. designatien in Me Gempi-ehensive Plan and thHs is. in the best intepest of the City.-Not applicable B. Preliminary Plat Findings: In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; The City Council finds that the proposed preliminary plats, with recommended conditions, are in substantial compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density, transportation, and pedestrian connectivity. (Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies in, Section V of this report for more information) 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds that public services will be provided to the subject properties proposed to be subdivided with development. (See Section IX of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers) 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the development at their own cost, the City Council finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. Page 61 Page 231 Item#5. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development based upon comments from the public service providers (i.e., Police, Fire, ACHD, etc). (See Section IXfor more information) 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health,safety or general welfare; and, The City Council is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated with the platting of this property. ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The City Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that exist on this site that require preserving. Page 62 Page 232 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Apex Southeast (H-2020-0057) by Brighton, Murgoitio, et al., Located at the Southeast Corner of S. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Lake Hazel Rd. Page 233 Item#6. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW #... AND DECISION& ORDER , In the Matter of the Request for a Modification to the Existing Development Agreements(H-2015- 0019: Brighton Investments,LLC—Inst.#2016-007072; SCS Brighton,LLC—Inst.#2016-007073; Murgoitio Limited Partnership—Inst.#2016-007074)to Replace the Agreements with One New Agreement Based on the Proposed Development Plan; Rezone of 384.97 acres of Land from the R-4 to the R-8(144.78+ 119.28=264.06 acres),R-15(76.93 acres) and C-C (43.28 acres)Zoning Districts; Preliminary Plat Consisting of 120 Residential Buildable Lots, 11 Commercial Buildable Lots and 14 Common Lots on 41.75 Acres of Land in the C-C and R-15 Zoning Districts; and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 237 Residential Buildable Lots,2 Commercial Buildable Lots,30 Common Lots and 10 Other(Shared Driveway)Lots on 81.63 Acres of Land in the C-C and R-8 Zoning Districts,by Brighton,Murgoitio, et al. Case No(s).H-2020-0066;H-2020-0056; H-2020-0057 For the City Council Hearing Date of: August 11,2020 (Findings on August 25,2020) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11, 2020, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11,2020, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11, 2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11, 2020, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § l l-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR APEX—MDA,RZ H-2020-0066;NORTHWEST—PP H-2020-0056;SOUTHEAST—PP H-2020-0057 - I Page 234 Item#6. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11,2020, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § I I-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for a modification to the existing Development Agreements,Rezone and Preliminary Plats is hereby approved per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11,2020, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years.Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 11- 6B-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR APEX—MDA,RZ H-2020-0066;NORTHWEST—PP H-2020-0056;SOUTHEAST—PP H-2020-0057 -2- Page 235 Item#6. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28)days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11,2020 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR APEX—MDA,RZ H-2020-0066;NORTHWEST—PP H-2020-0056;SOUTHEAST—PP H-2020-0057 -3 Page 236 Item#6. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 25th day of August 2020. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E.Simison Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 8-25-2020 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR APEX—MDA,RZ H-2020-0066;NORTHWEST—PP H-2020-0056;SOUTHEAST—PP H-2020-0057 -4 Page 237 Item#6. EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORTC�WE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 8/11/2020 legend 0 Project Lacfl�ian � TO: Mayor&City Council I f -- .i FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner f 208-884-5533 - -- -- Y - F SUBJECT: H-2020-0066 Apex—MDA,A?RZ ; H-2020-0056 Apex Northwest—PP - - H-2020-0057 Apex Southeast—PP IF - _ 5 (to be marketed as "Pinnacle') - C LOCATION: MDA,A7,,RZ: generally located east of N_a S. Meridian Rd. and north of E. k Columbia Rd., in Sections 31 (S. '/2 and --- , NW '/4) and 32 (SW'/4),Township 3N., _ Range LE; and Sections 5 (NW %4) and 6 (NE '/4), T.2N.,R.1 E. PP(NW):NWC of S. Locust Grove Rd. &E. Lake Hazel Rd., in the SE '/4 of Section 31,T.3N., R.IE PP(SE): SEC of S. Locust Grove Rd. & E. Lake Hazel Rd., in the NW '/4 of Section 5,T.2N.,R.1E. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Modification to existing Development Agreements(H-2015-0019: Brighton Investments, LLC—Inst. #2016- 007072; SCS Brighton,LLC—Inst. #2016-007073; Murgoitio Limited Partnership—Inst. #2016-007074)to replace the agreements with one new agreement based on the proposed development plan; ^rrexatio of nn nn and,Rezone of 384.97 acres of land from the R-4 to the R 2 (0.79 aefe}R-8 (144.78+ 119.28=264.06 acres),R-15 (76.93 acres) and C-C(43.28 acres)zoning districts. Apex Northwest(NW): Preliminary Plat consisting of 120 residential buildable lots, 11 commercial buildable lots and 14 common lots on 41.75 acres of land in the C-C and R-15 zoning districts. Apex Southeast(SE): Preliminary Plat consisting of 237 residential buildable lots,2 commercial buildable lots, 30 common lots and 10 other(shared driveway)lots on 81.63 acres of land in the C-C and R-8 zoning districts. Because right-of-way for E. Lake Hazel Rd. and S. Locust Grove Rd. separates the land proposed to be platted, two separate preliminary plat applications are required to subdivide the property. Page 1 Page 238 Item#6. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage ^�."�r384.97(RZ);41.75 (PP-Northwest); 81.63 (PP-Southeast) Existing/Proposed Zoning RUT in Ada County(existing);R-4(Medium Low-Density Residential) Future Land Use Designation Low ensity Residential[LDR(3-or-fewer units/aere) 34aeres); Medium Density Residential(MDR—3 to 8 units/acre)(206/-acres); Medium High-Density Residential(21+/-acres); &Mixed Use— Community(MU-C)(120+/-acres) Existing Land Use(s) Agricultural Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family residential(SFR)attached/detached,commercial,office,2 schools(elementary&charter) Lots(#and type;bldg./common) NW: 120 residential buildable/II commercial buildable/14 common SE:237 residential buildable/2 commercial buildable/30 common/10 other NW&SE Combined: 357 SFR residential buildable; 13 commercial buildable;44 common lots;and 10 other lots for shared driveways Phasing Plan(#of phases) 3 (NW); 5 (SE) Number of Residential Units(type NW: 120 units(88 detached/32 attached) of units) SE:237 units(detached) NW&SE Combined: 325 detached&88 attached Density(gross&net) NW: 5.62 units/acre(gross); 11.21 units/acre(net) SE: 3.75 units/acre(gross);6.17 units/acre(net) NW&SE(overall):4.22 units/acre(gross);7.27 units/acre(net) Open Space(acres,total NW: 6.33 acres(15.17%) [%]/buffer/qualified) SE: 10.79 acres(13.22%) NW&SE Combined: 17.12 acres(or 13.88%) Amenities NW: Community center with a clubhouse,community post office,cafe, library/business center;community amphitheater;additional common open space above the minimum required. SE: Community swimming pool,tot lot with play equipment,pathway access to the City's Discovery Park,additional common open space above the minimum required. Physical Features(waterways, The Farr Lateral runs along the north and east boundaries of this site;the hazards,flood plain,hillside) McBirney Lateral crosses the site east/west;and another waterway runs north/south through the site. Neighborhood meeting date;#of 2/5/20;29 attendees W attendees: History(previous approvals) ROS#7394;ROS#7783;H-2015-0019—South Meridian AZ(DA's: Brighton Investments,LLC—Inst.#2016-007072; SCS Brighton,LLC— Inst.#2016-007073;and Murgoitio Limited Partnership—Inst.#2016- 007074) B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Yes(PP,draft);Yes(AZ,RZ) • Requires ACHD Yes(TBD) Commission Action (yes/no) Traffic Impact Study(yes/no) Yes Page 2 Page 239 Item#6. Description Details I Page Access NW:2 accesses via S.Locust Grove Rd. &2 accesses via E. Lake Hazel Rd.,both (Arterial/Collectors/State existing arterial streets;and 2 collector streets are proposed Hwy/Local)(Existing and SE: 2 accesses via E.Lake Hazel Rd. &3 accesses via S.Locust Grove Rd.,both Proposed) existing arterial streets; and 3 collector streets are proposed Traffic Level of Service Better than"D"(Acceptable level of service is"E")—Lake Hazel,Locust Grove &Amity Roads Stub Two stub streets are proposed to this site from Prevail Subdivision near the Street/Interconnectivity/Cross northwest corner of the rezone area;no other stub streets exist to this site. Access Stub streets are proposed to adjacent properties for interconnectivity as shown on the preliminary plats. Existing Road Network There are no existing streets within the site,only S.Meridian Rd./SH-69,E.Lake Hazel Rd.and S.Locust Grove Rd.adjacent to the site Existing Arterial Sidewalks/ There are no existing sidewalks or buffers along Meridian Rd./SH-69,Lake Hazel, Buffers or Locust Grove Roads. Proposed Road Capital Improvements Plan{CIP}t Irriegrated Five Year Wark Plan JIFYWP): Improvements ■ Vd9lb RUA 15�rNALlgd Ift the IFYINP io be Wid�M 4 la 5-hWos fllotn Lake Ha,!Et RoAd td A nn ty Road to 2023 * Eagle Road G sanamw 1n me IFYWP m be wp]9nw to 5-Panes tram Amp Roeu to vwioiry Road In 2021 + Laka Hazel tined is sl fi dulod Hi Ina[l'NOF 10 bo WMenad kb 5-1arres fmrli 1=iJgla Road to Ckwerdelle Road iR 2024 + Leka Naze;Road is schad+dl9d in me iFYWP to be wvdemed to 5-mws from Cloveadsle Road to Five btde Road + Tw inlnrseu mn or Lake Ha291 Rood and Pa* RW rs sclwdulad e1 th9 IF'(WPv to M widened 1a 5-lipnes Qn the ngr4h lag,aaenes on ffu�sand+aeg,3-lone5 on the+Mast leg end 3- lano�s on the east leg and signohzed in 2023 + Thy inkwEK tivn 0 lovusi Grrnye Rid end 1 KImy Road is wchedul in the 1FYVJP to be� constructed as a muiilane tounmbw voth 4-lanes on me narth ornd south legs and 24anes on the east and west kegs in 207 1 * Labe Plarzel Road qs bstud 1n me CPR to be w w1oned l0 3-1:anes ham Locust Grove Road 10 Eagle Road berween 2026 and.Z630 Lake Hzxzel Road Is listed lit the C IP io be widened to 3-;anes from hl ndlan Road ISH-W to Locusl Grave Road balwemn 2026 arrel 2030. A fnity Road is Wed in the CIP to tre widened to 5-vnes tram Locus)Grove#toed to Eagle Reed berween nNi ghd 233t} The Intwsec6on of Lake Hazel Road and Lxmt Orove Rood n listed to the CIP to Ge r-sconstiluctad as a single larte roundaboul widened l0 34arres on toe MOP]leg,2•Pi9 05 Lin the south,2-Torres ees[,and 3-ianes on the wart lQg w1117 a msiwi-md bypass tight turn bypass lane between 20W and 2Q311 + The inimeoiw of Lake Hazel Raerd and SHE is listed en the CIP to be widened 90 7aenes on the north,saulh,west and ems)legs end signaized between ME and 20313 • The iiwar5ecfion of Locust Gr0ue F60dd end Amgyr Rued i5 I15ted iR the CIR to wiAeRetf to 4- hanes an 1ha norm leg,�-tines on the south lag,5�Ianos on the west leg and 9-4anss on the east leg and signalized between 2GX and 2MO Additional right-of-way is required to be dedicated for the future expansion of Lake Hazel&Locust Grove Roads with pavement widened to 17' from centerline Fire Service • Distance to Fire Station NW—3.3 miles to Fire Station 94 SE—3.1 miles to Fire Station#4 • Fire Response Time NW&SE-only a small portion falls within 5 minute response time goal • Resource Reliability NW&SE-78%-does not meet target goal of 80%or greater • Risk Identification NW&SE— 1 and 4,current resources would not be adequate to supply service to this project • Accessibility NW&SE-Project meets all required access,road widths and turnarounds if phasing plan is followed Page 3 Page 240 Item#6. Description Details Page • Special/resource needs NW&SE-Project will require an aerial device;response time is 9 minutes travel time(under ideal conditions)—can meet this need in the required timeframe if needed • Water Supply NW&SE-Requires 1,500 gallons per minute for 2 hours,may be less if buildings are fully sprinklered • Other Resources Police Service • Distance to Police 4.5 miles Station • Police Response Time Average response time in the City is just under 4 minutes—there isn't enough public initiated call data to determine an average response time for this area(goal is 3-5 minutes) • Calls for Service 71 (within a mile of site between 3/15/2019-3/14/2020) • Accessibility No concerns • Specialty/resource needs No additional resources are required at this time. • Crimes 10(within a mile of site between 3/15/2019-3/14/2020) • Crashes 38(within a mile of site between 3/15/2019-3/14/2020) • Other The MPD can provide service if this development is approved as they already serve this area. West Ada School District • Distance(elem,ms,hs) • Capacity of Schools Enr611m nt dr Miles &b v+awu • #of Students Enrolled Marys'MCPherioA Elememvy.. s5s 550 2h SlemElemeMary" 677 301) 3.1 vlewrw mWdle school 959 ]QW 4.2 mwntain vkwMilh khmi U19 zM9 34 —thdrin2 the 2N21 PChgvl ye4ar Mpry McPhergon's Student uPidtq will mcrcw%6 675r due 16 9hr mn cmi 0255r4"M expansion underway.** —Enrollrmnt at HrFIsddk E'emnentary h c-armiry upped.I;Ments In this dere{aprnent thal are In the HIWAam Mwldefy will he wrtanding Siena Fhtment■r}'una1 eieArstI166i Is h„1h t8 eiimineteauertrawE:ng all.HIWAaJe.*`* • #of Students Anticipated 286 from this Development Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Directly adjacent Services • Sewer Shed South Black Cat Trunk Shed • Estimated Project Sewer See application ERU's • WRRF Declining 13.95 Balance • Project Consistent with Yes WW Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts/Concerns Flow has been committed Water • Distance to Water Directly adjacent Services • Pressure Zone 5 • Estimated Project Water See application ERU's Page 4 Page 241 Item#6. • Water Quality None • Project Consistent with Yes ■ Water Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns Public Worles preference is to see all water utilities in the public right-of-way (ROW),where they can easily be operated and maintained.If the utilities truly cannot be installed in the public right-of-way,then our preference would be for utilities to be located in a dedicated and improved alley. If that cannot be accomplished,the applicant should work with Public Works for further solutions C. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend iul 0 Legend Pra t Laoulkm i fibI ProjEHat LmafiDn y mu-C "AU`R J �hed-I ig vnr' _ Resid nfial Zoning Map Planned Development Map Legend R T 10 Legend 0 Prajent Luc n=an Prcject Lnca5an Ku r R R- , city Llmik I-L Rl RUJT — Planned Flumes RU R-8 UT -R- R- U. -- RUT R-8- 14T R4 _ R R-2 - _ t TA— RUT RUT RUT C� --- Page 5 Page 242 Item#6. III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Brighton,Murgoitio,et al—2929 W.Navigator#400,Meridian,ID 83642 B. Owner: Same as Applicant C. Representative: Michael D. Wardle,Brighton Corporation—2929 W.Navigator#400,Meridian,ID 83642 IV. NOTICING Planning&Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Notification published in 6/19/2020 7/24/2020 newspaper Notification mailed to property owners within 300 feet 6/16/2020 7/21/2020 Applicant posted public hearing notice on site 6/26/2020 7/29/2020 Nextdoor posting 6/16/2020 7/21/2020 V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS(Comprehensive Plan) Land Use: The Future Land Use Map(FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan designates approximately 39 aer-es of the site as I e w Density Residential it DRR ,206+/-acres as Medium Density Residential(MDR); 21+/-acres as Medium High-Density Residential(MHDR); and 120+/-acres as Mixed Use—Community(MU-C). A future school site and City Park is designated in the general area northwest of the Locust Grove/Lake Hazel intersection,north of the MU-C designated area. Another school site is designated on the east side of N. Locust Grove Rd.,north of Lake Hazel Rd.,just north of the subject rezone area. The LPR designa4ion allows feF the development of single family homes oft large a-ad estate lots at gross densities of 3 dwelling units or-less per-aer-e. These areas eften transition between existing rufal r-esidefi4ial and urban properties. Developments need to r-espeet agr-ieultufal heritage and r-eseufees,r-eeegaize view sheds and open spaees, a-ad maintain or-improve the over-all atmosphere of the area. The use of open > , and other-. iate means shetil d o„h.nee the,.,.,,.actor of the area. The MDR designation allows for dwelling units at gross densities of 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The MHDR designation allows for a mix of dwelling types including townhouses,condominiums, and apartments. Residential gross densities should range from 8 to 12 dwelling units per acre. These areas are relatively compact within the context of larger neighborhoods and are typically located around or near mixed use commercial or employment areas to provide convenient access to services and jobs for residents. Developments need to incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place and should also incorporate connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways, attractive landscaping and a project identity. The purpose of the MU-C designation is to allocate areas where community-serving uses and dwellings are seamlessly integrated into the urban fabric. The intent is to integrate a variety of uses, including residential, and to avoid mainly single-use and strip commercial type buildings.Non-residential buildings in these areas Page 6 Page 243 Item#6. have a tendency to be larger than in Mixed Use—Neighborhood(MU-N) areas,but not as large as in Mixed Use—Regional(MU-R) areas. Goods and services in these areas tend to be of the variety that people will mainly travel by car to,but also walk or bike to(up to 3 or 4 miles). Employment opportunities for those living in and around the neighborhood are encouraged. Developments are encouraged to be designed according to the conceptual MU-C plan depicted in Figure 3C in the Comprehensive Plan(see pg. 3-16). In reviewing development applications,the items noted on Pgs. 3-13, 3-15 and 3-16 will be considered(see analysis below). Transportation: ACHD's Master Street Map (MSM)depicts an east/west residential collector street at the half mile between Amity and Lake Hazel Roads; a north/south industrial collector at the half mile between Meridian and Locust Grove Roads north of the half mile between Amity and Lake Hazel Roads,which transitions to a residential collector to the south to Lake Hazel Rd.; a commercial collector around the MU-C designated area at the Locust Grove/Lake Hazel intersection(see dashed lines on map below), and a residential collector along the southern boundary of Apex Southeast.A dual lane roundabout is planned at the Locust Grove/Lake Hazel Rd. intersection.Note:Because a residential collector seems to be more appropriate than an industrial collector street designation in this area,ACHD has included a change to the street classification in the MSM update currently in process. The proposed preliminary plats depict collector streets consistent with the MSM(i.e. E. Crescendo St. & S. Apex Ave. in Apex Northwest; and E. Tower St., S.Vertex Way and E.Via Roberto St. in Apex Southeast). The proposed Master Plan included in Section VIII.A, depicts conceptual street locations in the annexation/rezone area; future preliminary plats should provide collector streets in accord with the MSM as required by ACHD. ti �- r IF 41 -P W-11' J Proposed Development: The Applicant proposes to develop the 41.75 acre property at the northwest corner of Locust Grove and Lake Hazel Roads in the MDR&MU-C designated areas with 120 single-family residential units consisting of 32 attached units and 88 detached units, a future public elementary school, and neighborhood-scale commercial uses as allowed in the C-C zoning district. The 81.63 acre property located at the southeast corner of Locust Grove and Lake Hazel Roads in the MDR and MU-C designated areas is Page 7 Page 244 Item#6. proposed to develop with 237 single-family residential detached units,a charter school, and commercial uses as allowed in the C-C zoning district. A City Park is not required to be provided with this development due to the proximity of Discovery Park at the project's southeast boundary; however,the Park's Dept.would be willing to discuss the potential for a partnership if desired by the Applicant. The following Comprehensive Plan Policies are applicable to this development: • "Encourage a variety of housing types that meet the needs, preferences, and financial capabilities of Meridian's present and future residents."(2.01.02D) A mix of single family attached and detached units(alley-loaded)are proposed in Apex Northwest; only single-family detached units (front and alley-loaded) are proposed in Apex Southeast. • "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and urban services at the time of final approval,and in accord with any adopted levels of service for public facilities and services."(3.03.03F) City water and sewer service is available and can be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. • "Avoid the concentration of any one housing type or lot size in any geographical area;provide for diverse housing types throughout the City."(2.01.01 G) A mix of single family attached and detached units (alley-loaded) are proposed in Apex Northwest; only single-family detached units (front-and alley-loaded) are proposed in Apex Southeast. • "Encourage compatible uses and site design to minimize conflicts and maximize use of land." (3.07.00) The proposed residential uses should be compatible with existing rural residential/agricultural uses in the area. The proposed design of the commercial and residential areas with streets separating the uses should minimize conflicts. • "With new subdivision plats,require the design and construction of pathway connections, easy pedestrian and bicycle access to parks, safe routes to schools,and the incorporation of usable open space with quality amenities." (2.02.01A) Internal pedestrian pathways are proposed through common areas for interconnectivity as well as to the City Park on the east side of Apex Southeast and to perimeter sidewalks. Segments of the City's multi-use pathway system are required in accord with the Pathways Master Plan (see Park's Dept. comments in Section IX.E).Detached sidewalks are proposed along the arterial and collector streets for safe pedestrian access. Usable open space and quality amenities are proposed(see detailed analysis below in Section VIB). • "Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development."(3.03.03A) The proposed development will connect to City water and sewer systems;services are required to be provided to and though this development in accord with current City plans. • "Require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks,water and sewer utilities."(3.03.03G) Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter and sidewalks is required to be provided with development as proposed with the preliminary plats. Page 8 Page 245 Item#6. • "Encourage the development of high quality, dense residential and mixed use areas near in and around Downtown,near employment, large shopping centers,public open spaces and parks, and along major transportation corridors, as shown on the Future Land Use Map."(2.02.01E) Lake Hazel Rd. lies between the proposed preliminary plats and is classified as a residential mobility arterial that is planned to be a major transportation corridor. A City Park(Discovery Park)abuts the east side of the proposed Apex Southeast subdivision.All four corners of the Lake Hazel/Locust Grove intersection are designated for mixed use (MU-C)development. Development in this area should be high quality and more densely populated at a minimum of 6 units/acre in the MU-C designated area. The gross density of Apex Southeast is only 3.75 units per acre while the density of Apex Northwest is 5.62 units per acre.Staff encourages a higher density due to the location of this site adjacent to a major transportation corridor and City Parr This could be attained through the inclusion of more dense housing types such as more single-family attached units, townhome units and/or multi family apartments. • "Ensure development provides safe routes and access to schools,parks, and other community gathering places."(2.02.01G) Detached sidewalks and pathways are proposed throughout the proposed subdivisions for safe pedestrian access to the future school sites, the City Park and neighborhood commercial/office uses. • "Where feasible, encourage large transmission and pipeline utility corridors to function as transitional buffers,parkland,pathways,and gathering spaces within and adjacent to their right of way."(3.07.01E) A 75 foot wide easement for the Williams Northwest Gas Pipeline crosses this site and is depicted on the Master Plan and preliminary plats as grassy open space area containing a multi-use pathway. No structures are allowed within this easement. • "Require collectors consistent with the ACHD Master Street Map(MSM), generally at/near the mid- mile location within the Area of City Impact."(6.01.03B) Collector streets are proposed on the preliminary plats in accord with the MSM; collector streets will be required to be provided with future preliminary plats in accord with the MSM as required by ACHD. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in all Mixed Use areas, per the Comprehensive Plan(pg.3-13): (Staffs analysis in italics) • "A mixed-use project should include at least three types of land uses. Exceptions may be granted for smaller sites on a case-by-case basis. This land use is not intended for high density residential development alone." The proposed development includes four(4) different land use types—residential(single-family), civic (i.e. amphitheater and community center), commercial and office. • "Where appropriate,higher density and/or multi-family residential development is encouraged for projects with the potential to serve as employment destination centers and when the project is adjacent to US 20/26, SH-55, SH-16 or SH-69." Although a small portion of land proposed to be annexed with this application fronts on SH-69/S. Meridian Rd., it is not proposed to redevelop with this application and is designated for LDR uses. • "Mixed Use areas are typically developed under a master or conceptual plan; during an annexation or rezone request,a development agreement will typically be required for developments with a Mixed Use designation." A Master Plan is proposed with the rezone request for the portion of the property surrounding the Lake Hazel/Locust Grove intersection designated as MU-C(see Section VIII.A).A Development Agreement Page 9 Page 246 Item#6. is required as a provision of the rezone to ensure future development is consistent with the MU-C FL UM designation. • "In developments where multiple commercial and/or office buildings are proposed,the buildings should be arranged to create some form of common,usable area, such as a plaza or green space." The Master Plan for Apex Northwest depicts a community center with a plaza and amphitheater in the commercial portion of the development. The Master Plan for the commercial portion of Apex Southeast nearest the intersection doesn't include a development plan—the future plan should include some form of common, usable area such as a plaza or green space as desired as should other future commercial/office areas in MU-C designated areas where future development is unknown at this time. • "The site plan should depict a transitional use and/or landscaped buffering between commercial and existing low-or medium-density residential development." There are no existing residential uses adjacent to proposed commercial development; therefore, transitional uses and buffering aren't applicable. • "Community-serving facilities such as hospitals,clinics, churches, schools,parks, daycares,civic buildings, or public safety facilities are expected in larger mixed-use developments." A public school is planned in Apex Northwest and a charter school is planned in Apex Southeast per the Master Plan in accord with the FL UM which depicts two school sites in this general area.A community center and amphitheater is proposed in the commercial portion of Apex Northwest. A 27-acre City Park (Discovery Park) abuts the east side of Apex Southeast.A linear open space is planned where the Williams Northwest Gas Pipeline easement is located. • "Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks,plazas,outdoor gathering areas, open space,libraries, and schools are expected; outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count." An outdoor amphitheater, community center with a plaza and charter school is proposed in this development in the MU-C designated area. Discovery Park, a 27-acre regional City park, exists to the east of Apex Southeast and includes picnic shelters,pathways, open play areas,play structures, a splash pad, an off-leash dog park and ballfields. • "Mixed use areas should be centered around spaces that are well-designed public and quasi-public centers of activity. Spaces should be activated and incorporate permanent design elements and amenities that foster a wide variety of interests ranging from leisure to play. These areas should be thoughtfully integrated into the development and further placemaking opportunities considered." The public/quasi-public areas (i.e. community center and amphitheater)proposed in this development are centrally located within the mixed use designated area in Apex Northwest. Discovery Park abuts Apex Southeast and offers a wide variety of activities for area residents. • "All mixed-use projects should be directly accessible to neighborhoods within the section by both vehicles and pedestrians." The proposed mixed use developments will be directly accessible to adjacent neighborhoods within the section through extension of streets and internal pedestrian pathways. • "Alleys and roadways should be used to transition from dissimilar land uses, and between residential densities and housing types." Roadways are proposed as a transition between residential and commercial land uses in both of the proposed subdivisions; and alleys, roadways and common areas are proposed between residential housing types and densities as desired. Page 10 Page 247 Item#6. • "Because of the parcel configuration within Old Town,development is not subject to the Mixed Use standards listed herein." The subject property is not located in Old Town, therefore, this item is not applicable. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in MU-C areas, per the Comprehensive Plan (pgs.3-15 thru 3-16): • "Developments should comply with the general guidelines for development in all Mixed Use areas." See analysis above. • "All developments should have a mix of at least three land use types." The proposed development has a mix of residential, commercial, office and civic uses as desired. • "Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 20%of the development area at gross densities ranging from 6 to 15 units/acre." Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 20%of the overall MU-C designated area at a minimum density of 6 units/acre. Prior to development of the `future development"areas on the Master Plan, a conceptual development plan should be submitted to ensure compliance. • "Non-residential buildings should be proportional to and blend in with adjacent residential buildings." The design, color, construction materials and height of non-residential buildings should be proportional to and blend with adjacent residential buildings as desired. • "Vertically integrated structures are encouraged." No vertically integrated structures are proposed at this time but are encouraged to be included. • "Unless a structure contains a mix of both residential and office, or residential and commercial land uses, a maximum building size should be limited to a 30,000 square-foot building footprint. For community grocery stores,the maximum building size should be limited to a 30,000 square-foot building footprint. For community grocery stores,the maximum building size should be limited to a 60,000 square-foot building footprint. For the development of public school sites,the maximum building size does not apply." The building footprints shown on the Master Plan do not exceed 30,000 square feet;future development should be consistent with this guideline. • "Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks,plazas, outdoor gathering areas, open space,libraries,and schools that comprise a minimum of 5%of the development area are required. Outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count towards this requirement." A community center with a plaza area and amphitheater are proposed in Apex Northwest adjacent to service commercial and office uses; a charter school is proposed in Apex Southeast. These types of spaces and places and uses should be provided in all of the MU-C designated areas in accord with this guideline. Linear open space containing a multi-use pathway is proposed where the Williams Northwest Gas Pipeline easement is located. • Where the development proposes public and quasi-public uses to support the development above the minimum 5%,the developer may be eligible for additional residential densities and/or an increase to the maximum building footprint." Although this is an option, the developer is not requesting an increase in density or in the maximum building footprint allowed. Staff believes the proposed development plan is generally consistent with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density and transportation. Page 11 Page 248 Item#6. VI. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ANALYSIS(UDC A. Development Agreement Modification (MDA): The Applicant proposes to modify the existing Development Agreements(H-2015-0019: Brighton Investments, LLC—Inst. #2016-007072; SCS Brighton, LLC—Inst. #2016-007073; Murgoitio Limited Partnership—Inst. #2016-007074)for this property in order to replace the agreements with one new agreement based on the proposed Master Plan(see Section VIII.A). The existing Development Agreements (DA's)were required with the South Meridian Annexation application in 2015. Because that application was initiated by the City,no development was proposed at that time. A"placeholder"zoning of R-4 was assigned to all of the properties with the requirement that any future development would require an amendment to the DA's to approve any proposed development plan. Existing allowed uses in the County pertaining to the raising or maintaining of livestock and agricultural operations; an exemption to MCC 6-3-10,Firearms,Dischargeable Instruments; and existing agreements for the collection of solid waste were allowed to remain and continue until such time as the properties redeveloped in the future. With the proposed development,these uses are required to cease. The existing DA's require any property or easements needed by the City to provide any sewer or water infrastructure needed in furtherance of the agreement to be provided by the Owner at no cost to the City for the intent of providing for the advancement of sewer and water infrastructure for the benefit of the property,the City and adjacent properties for water mains, sewer mains and trunk lines. Because all of the water and sewer infrastructure commitments have been met and have been constructed,these provisions do not need to be carried over to the new DA. Staff recommends the proposed Master Plan is included in the new DA along with the provisions for future development listed in Section IX.A.1 to ensure compliance with the MU-C FLUM designation. expired.B. Annexation & Zoning(A.Z)a Anne*a4ion of Lot 4, Bleek 1 of Shafer-View Estates Subdivision eensisting of 40.09 aer-es of!and is proposed with an R 2 zoning distr-iet eensistent with the asseeiated FLUM desigaa�ien of LDR. This le be used as open spaee for-a period of not less than 15 years from the r-eeer-ding da4e of the plat;beeause the dwellings,No develepmefi4 is proposed at this time.Annexation is Fequested beea-use the easterly 10 aer-es of the lot is needed for-sewer-and aeeess to the proposed develapmen4; the remainder-of the pr-opefty is not proposed develop as paft of this pr-ejeet. Futtwe develepraea4 is required to eemply with the dimensional sta-adafds of the R 2 zoning distfiet. The Developer-plans to develop the property between the eolleetef stfeet and the adjoining ShafeF View Subdivision with 1 aer-e lots as a tFansition and buffer-to the existing neighbor-heed. Prior-to annexation of the property, a lot division should be approved by Ada County in order-for- the Applieant to only develop the eastern portion of the pr-opeFt-y.- The annexation area is within the Area of City impaet Betmdar-y(AQQ).A legal deser-iption for-the annexation area is ineluded in Seetion VIII.B. The City may r-equir-e a development agreement(DA) in eet��etien with an annexation ptwsttant to 1da Code seetion 67 651!A. Beeause the R 2 distr-iet only allows single family residential detaehed par-ks> nd > Staff does not feel it's neeessafy to r-estfiet development of the pr-epei4y dffettgh a DA Fef Page 12 Page 249 Item#6. C. Rezone(RZ): A rezone of 384.97 acres of land from the R-4 to the ,R-8 (144.78+ 119.28=264.06 acres),R-15 (76.93 acres)and C-C(43.28 acres)zoning districts is proposed. afea on the west side of the f4ffe eelleeter-stfeet depieted on the Master-Plan. Beeause this pr-epeAy is designated N4DR on the FLUM,the R 4 or R 8 zoning distriets would t�Tieally be the best zoning choices. annexed with R 2 zoning, Stag r-eeewumeads the adjaeent LDR design4ion is used for-the area proposed be rezoned as allowed in the Comprehensive Plan when deemed appropriate and approved as paft of-a publie hearing with a land development application(see pg. 3 9).No development is proposed at this time. Ftitefe development is r-e"ir-ed to eemplywith the dimensional standards of the R 2 zoning distfiet listed inUT'�1e112A 4 and the allowed uses liste''�Table 11 2A 2. The areas proposed to be rezoned to R-8 consisting of a total of 264.06 acres are primarily designated on the FLUM as MDR but some of the area is within the MU-C designated area. The Master Plan does not depict a conceptual development plan for much of the R-8 zoned area except for that to the south of the C- C zoned area in Apex Southeast where single-family detached homes are proposed at a gross density of 3.75 units/acre. Because this area is in close proximity to a major transportation/mobility corridor (E.Lake Hazel Rd.) and a City Park, a higher density in this area is encouraged. The 76.93 acre areas proposed to be rezoned to R-15 lie within areas designated as MDR,MHDR and MU-C on the FLUM. The Master Plan does not include a conceptual development plan for the portion in the MHDR designated area. To ensure future development occurs consistent with the guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan for MHDR designated areas, Staff recommends a DA provision requiring future development to incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place; an alternative housing type such as townhomes and/or multi- family is recommended.Connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways, attractive landscaping and project identity should also be provided.The majority of the remainder of the R-15 area is designated MU-C with a small portion designated MDR.Alley-loaded single-family attached and detached homes are depicted on the Master Plan in the MDR and MU-C designated areas included in the Apex Northwest plat at the northwest corner of Locust Grove/Lake Hazel Roads in accord with the Comprehensive Plan. A concept development plan is not proposed for the remainder of the area proposed to be zoned R-15 north of the commercial area in Apex Northwest, on the south side of Lake Hazel and on the east side of Locust Grove in the MU-C designated area. To ensure these areas develop consistent with the general Mixed Use and MU-C guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan, Staff recommends the DA is amended prior to development of these areas to include a conceptual development plan. Future development should comply with the dimensional standards of the R-15 district listed in UDC Table 11- 2A-7,the allowed uses for the R-15 district listed in UDC Table 11-2A-2, and the general guidelines for Mixed Use developments and specifically MU-C designated areas in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed rezone of 43.28 acres of land to the C-C zoning district is consistent with the associated FLUM designation of MU-C. The area at the northwest corner of Locust Grove and Lake Hazel Roads is proposed to develop with a mix of neighborhood-serving commercial and office uses including a community center and amphitheater; and the area on the south side of Lake Hazel,east of the Locust Grove/Lake Hazel intersection is proposed to develop with a charter school as depicted on the Master Plan. A conceptual development plan is not proposed for the MU-C designated areas at the southwest, southeast and northeast corners of the intersection. To ensure these areas develop consistent with the general Mixed Use and MU-C guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan, Staff recommends the DA is amended prior to development of these areas to include a conceptual development plan consistent with these guidelines. Page 13 Page 250 Item#6. The Murgoitio property(Parcel#S1406110110)located southwest of the E.Lake Hazel/S.Locust Grove Rd.intersection shown as an"NAP"should be included in a future subdivision of the surrounding property(Parcel#S1406110350 or#S1406110015)in order to establish a legal division of land. Or,if a parcel division was approved by Ada County for the current configuration of the property,proof of such should be submitted to the Planning Division with a future subdivision application for the surrounding property. Legal deser-iptionswith asseeiated e*hibit maps of the areas proposed to be rezoned are ifieluded in land thftt is PfiFt Of the annexation request, Staff has requested the Applicant revise the dese4ption to exelude that area; a revised legal description and exhibit map should be submitted pr-i-OF tO the City Couneil hearing. The City may require a development agreement(DA)in conjunction with a rezone pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. Because a new DA is proposed to replace the existing DA's Staff recommends the above recommended DA provisions are included in that agreement. D. Preliminary Plats: Two separate preliminary plats,Apex Northwest and Apex Southeast,are proposed due to ACHD right-of- way(ROW) for Lake Hazel and Locust Grove Roads separating the properties. Because this overall project will be developed as a single integrated project and marketed as such, analysis of both projects is included in this report. Apex Northwest consists of 120 single-family residential buildable lots for the development of 88 detached and 32 attached dwelling units, 11 commercial buildable lots and 14 common lots on 41.75 acres of land in the C-C and R-15 zoning districts. The minimum lot size proposed is 2,863 square feet(s.£)with an average lot size of 3,885 s.f. The gross density proposed is 5.62 units/acre with a net density of 11.21 units/acre. The subdivision is proposed to develop in 3 phases as shown on the Phasing Plan in Section VIII.D. Apex Southeast consists of 237 single-family residential buildable lots,2 commercial buildable lots, 30 common lots and 10 other(shared driveway) lots on 81.63 acres of land in the C-C and R-8 zoning districts. The minimum lot size proposed is 4,840 square feet(s.f.)with an average lot size of 7,058 s.f. The gross density proposed is 3.75 units/acre with a net density of 6.17 units/acre. The subdivision is proposed to develop in three(5)phases as shown on the phasing plan in Section VIII.D. Overall,a total of 357 single-family residential buildable lots, 13 commercial buildable lots,44 common lots and 10 other lots are proposed between the two subdivisions at a gross overall density of 4.22 units/acre and a net overall density of 7.27 units/acre. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There are no existing structures within the boundaries of the proposed plats. The Northwest Williams Gas Pipeline crosses the northeast corners of Apex Northwest(Lot 2,Block 6) and Southeast(Lot 1,Block 9 and Lot 1,Block 14)subdivisions as depicted on the preliminary plats. Development within this area should comply with the Williams Developers' Handbook.No structures should be located within the easement. Proposed Use Analysis: The proposed single-family detached and attached dwellings are listed as a principal permitted use in the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts; and an education institution is listed as a conditional use in the R-8 zoning district per UDC Table 11-2A-2, subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-14. An education institution and professional service(i.e. office) is listed as a principal permitted use in the C-C Page 14 Page 251 Item#6. district, subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-14; other allowed uses in the C-C district are listed in UDC Table 11-213-2. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): Development of the subject property is required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district, 11-2A-7 for the R-15 district and 11-213-3 for the C-C district. Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards(UDC 11-6C-3) Development of the subdivision is required to comply with the subdivision design and improvement standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3, including but not limited to streets, alleys, common driveways, easements and block face. The proposed lots in Apex Northwest are consistent with the dimensional standards of the R-15 and C-C zoning districts. However,one of the alleys is not designed so that the entire length is visible from a public street as required by UDC 11-6C-3B.5e;the plat should be revised to comply.Common driveways that comply with the standards in UDC 11-6C-3D may be considered as an alternative. The proposed lots in Apex Southeast are consistent with the dimensional standards of the C-C and R-8 zoning districts. Two(2) alleys and 10 common driveways are proposed in the residential portion of the development that are consistent with the standards in UDC 11-6C-3. Such alleys and common driveways should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-313.5 and 11-6C-3D. A perpetual ingress/egress easement is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder for the common driveways,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. An exhibit should be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks,fencing,building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via the common driveway; if a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street,the driveway should be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway. Address signage should be provided at the public street for homes accessed via common driveways for emergency wayfinding purposes. Access(UDC 11-3A-3) Access is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-3. Apex Northwest: Two(2)public street accesses are proposed via E. Lake Hazel Rd., an arterial street, and two (2)public street accesses are proposed via S. Locust Grove Rd., an arterial street. Collector streets(E. Crescendo St. and S.Apex Ave.)are proposed in accord with the MSM. Apex Southeast: Three(3)public street accesses are proposed via S. Locust Grove Rd., an arterial street, and two(2)public street accesses are proposed via E.Lake Hazel Rd., an arterial street. Collector streets (E. Tower St., S.Vertex Way and E. Via Roberto St.)are proposed in accord with the MSM. Alleys are proposed for access to alley-loaded homes in Apex Northwest and Apex Southeast. Common driveways are proposed for access to certain homes in Apex Southeast. Cross-access easements should be provided between all commercial lots in the subdivisions as set forth in UDC 11-3A-3A.2. Road Improvements: The Applicant has proposed to enter into a Cooperative Development Agreement (CDA)with ACHD to improve Lake Hazel Road abutting the site with(4) 11.5' wide travel lanes, a 19' wide center landscape median,vertical curb, gutter, 8' wide planter strips and 10' wide detached concrete sidewalks within 109' to 120. 5' of right-of-way(ROW)with the first phase of development. The Applicant has proposed to construct dedicated right-turn lanes on Lake Hazel Rd. at Aspiration Ave.,Apex Ave.,Peak Ave. and Vertex Way. Locust Grove Rd. abutting the site is proposed to be improved with(3) 12' wide travel lanes with 6.5' wide bike lanes,vertical curb, gutter, 8' wide planter strips and 5' wide Page 15 Page 252 Item#6. detached concrete sidewalks within 77' of ROW. The specific conditions of approval pertaining to the CDA are included in the ACHD report in Section IX.H. Parking(UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family detached dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. Future development should comply with these standards. Parking for non-residential uses is required per the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-6B.1. Pathways(UDC 11-3A-8): The Pathways Master Plan(PMP)depicts segments of the City's multi-use pathway system in the linear area where the Williams gas pipeline is located and along the east boundary of the rezone area. Pathways should be provided with development in accord with the PMP per the conditions from the Park's Dept. in Section IX.E. All pathways shall be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8 and the Pathways Master Plan.Landscaping shall be provided along either side of the pathway in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-12C.Public pedestrian easements(14-feet wide) should be provided prior to signature by the City Engineer on final plat phases in which pathways are located. Staff recommends two(2) additional micro-path connections are provided in Apex Southeast at the east boundary to Discovery Park. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-1 : The UDC(11-3A-17)requires, at a minimum, detached sidewalks to be provided along arterial and collector streets and attached sidewalk to be provided along local streets. Detached sidewalks are proposed along all internal local and collector streets and along the arterial streets in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-17): Eight-foot wide parkways are proposed adjacent to all streets with detached sidewalks; all parkways are required to be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): A 25-foot wide street buffer is required adjacent to S. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Lake Hazel Rd.,both arterial streets; and a 20-foot wide street buffer is required adjacent to E. Crescendo St., S. Apex Ave., E. Tower St., S.Vertex Way and E. Via Roberto St., all collector streets,landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-313-7C.Alternative Compliance may be requested to UDC 11-3B-7C.2a for street buffers along collector streets to be located in a dedicated buffer rather than in a common lot. Parkways are required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17 and 11-3B- 7C. Landscaping is required along all pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C as discussed above. Common open space is required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3E. Mitigation is required for any existing trees proposed to be removed from the site as set forth in UDC I I- 3B-10.C.5. If the unimproved right-of-way is 10 feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line,the Developer is required to maintain a 10 foot compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of ACHD and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.5.A license agreement for improvements within the right-of-way is required between the property owner and ACHD. Page 16 Page 253 Item#6. Qualified Open Space(UDC 11-3 : A minimum of 10%qualified open space meeting the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B is required to be provided with development of land in residential districts. Based on the residential portion of the Apex Northwest plat(31.52 acres) zoned R-15, a minimum of 3.15 acres of qualified open space is required to be provided. Qualified open space consists of all of the street buffers along collector streets,half of the street buffers along arterial streets,the 8-foot wide parkways between the curb and detached sidewalk, linear open space at least 20' wide and up to 50' wide that has an access at each end, and open grassy areas of at least 50' x 100' in area. Although an open space exhibit was submitted that appears to meet the minimum standards,it includes areas in the C-C zoning district that do not qualify toward the minimum requirements for the subdivision. Staff recommends the exhibit is revised prior to the Council hearing to only depict areas that qualify per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B in order to ensure consistency with this standard.If additional qualified open space is needed,the plat should be revised to comply. Based on the residential area of the Apex Southeast plat(63.18 acres)zoned R-8, a minimum of 6.32 acres of qualified open space is required to be provided. Qualified open space consists of all of the street buffers along collector streets,half of the street buffers along arterial streets,the 8-foot wide parkways between the curb and detached sidewalk, linear open space at least 20' wide and up to 50' wide that has an access at each end, and open grassy areas of at least 50' x 100' in area. Although an open space exhibit was submitted that appears to comply with the minimum standards,it includes areas in the C-C zoning district that do not qualify toward the minimum requirements for the subdivision. Staff recommends the exhibit is revised prior to the Council hearing to only depict areas that qualify per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B to ensure consistency with this standard. If additional qualified open space is needed,the plat should be revised to comply. Qualified Site Amenities(UDC 11-3 . A minimum of one(1) qualified site amenity is required for each 20 acres of land to be developed in residential districts as set forth in UDC 11-3G-3. Based on the area of the residential portion of Apex Northwest(31.52 acres), a minimum of one (1) qualified site amenity is required to be provided. A gazebo is proposed as an amenity in Lot 32,Block 5 as an amenity; Staff recommends tables and benches are also provided as required for a"picnic area" amenity.A community center and amphitheater are also proposed as public amenities in the adjacent commercial portion of the development and a swimming pool is depicted on the Master Plan off-site on the adjacent property to the north; however, these do not qualify as amenities for the residential portion of the development proposed to be platted with this application. Based on the residential area of the Apex Southeast plat(63.18 acres)zoned R-8, a minimum of three(3) qualified site amenities are required to be provided. A swimming pool and children's play equipment are proposed in a central common area and pedestrian pathways(multi-use pathway along E.Lake Hazel Rd. and internal pathways)are proposed as amenities in this development in accord with UDC standards.A detail of the children's play equipment should be submitted with the final plat application. Waterways(UDC 11-3A-dy"j: There are no waterways within the boundary of the preliminary plats. The Farr Lateral runs along the north and east boundaries;the McBirney Lateral crosses the site east/west; and another waterway runs north/south through the annexation and/or rezone areas. Fencing(UDC 11-3A- : All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6C and 11-3A-7. Fencing is proposed as shown on the landscape plan. Page 17 Page 254 Item#6. Six-foot tall wood picket fencing is proposed along end caps at the ends of residential lots adjacent to common areas; and 5-foot tall clear vision metal fencing is proposed adjacent to internal common areas. Storm Drainage: An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction is required to follow Best Management Practice as adopted by the City. Irrigation: Underground,pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided for each and every lot within the development in accord with MCC 9-1,Water Use and Service. Irrigation water will be provided from Boise Project Board of Control. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): The Applicant submitted several perspective building elevations for the proposed single-family homes and for the commercial structures planned to be constructed in this development which are included in Section VIII.G. Homes depicted are a mix of 1-and 2-story units, attached and detached,with building materials consisting of a variety of siding styles and stucco with stone/brick veneer accents.Final design is required to comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual, single-family detached dwellings are exempt from design review standards. Because 2-story home elevations that face arterial and collector streets are highly visible, Staff recommends as a provision of the DA that the rear and/or side of structures on lots that face E.Lake Hazel Rd. and S.Locust Grove Road,arterial streets, and S.Vertex Way,E. Tower St.,E. Crescendo St., S.Apex Ave. and E.Via Roberto St.,collector streets,shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation (e.g.projections,recesses,step-backs, pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street.Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted and approved prior to submittal of any building permit applications for the swimming pool facility and non- residential/commercial structures. A Design Review application is required to be submitted for single- family attached units; one application can be submitted for the overall development if desired. Design review is not required for single-family detached homes. VII. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed MDA,AZ,RZ and PP applications with the requirement of a new Development Agreement with the provisions noted in Section IX.A per the Findings in Section X. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on July 9, 2020. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject MDA, RZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Jon Wardle b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Stacia Morgan; Annette Alonzo representing the Southern Rim Coalition d. Written testimony: Julie Edwards e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s) testimony a. Opposed to the proposed rezone from R-4 to R-15 for the land along Lake Hazel Rd. between Meridian Rd. &Locust Grove Rd. (not against ,gher density around Page 18 Page 255 Item#6. commercial areas);would like to see the zoning of the"future development"areas remain R-4 rather than be rezoned to R-8;belief that farm land and open space should be preserved as much as possible; concern that current school system does not have the capacity to accommodate all of the students from this development;would like a moratorium placed on development that has not already been approved to allow time for the school district and roads to catch up and to have time to re-evaluate how we want to use our dwindling remaining open spaces&farmland. b. Concern pertainingto o capacity of area schools and ability to accommodate more students from this development; c. Would like pathway provided to Black Rock Subdivision for connectivity. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. Concern pertainingto o capacity of area schools and impact of the proposed development on such, b. Supportive of proposed development, community amenities and associated improvements to Locust Grove and Lake Hazel Roads; 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. If revised qualified open space exhibit depicts qualified area less than 10%that the amphitheater in the commercial area be allowed to count toward the requirement through an alternative compliance request to UDC 11-3A-3. 5. Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: a. None Note: The annexation request was pulled from the Commission agenda at the request of the property owner so that it could be re-noticed with a change in zoning from R-2 to R-4. Therefore, it is not moving forward to Council with the MDA, RZ&PP applications. C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on August 11.2020. At the public hearing.the Council moved to approve the subject MDA, RZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Jon Wardle and David Turnbull,Brighton Corporation b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Chris Loveland,Marcella White,Julie Edwards d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: Joe Bon ig orno 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Not in favor of the proposed rezone from the R-4 district and density and lot sizes of the proposed development—preference for larger estate lots(1+acre)and open space. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Phasing of the preliminary plats; b. The uniqueness of the development with community amenities- C. Development is proactive in addressing traffic/infrastructure concerns up front; and, d. Concern about education issue and overcrowding of area schools. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation. a. None Page 19 Page 256 Item#6. VIII. EXHIBITS A. Master Plan (Revised) t 1 a Y 2 iIIAIFE •� LFYRLOP1Bd i_ r. t c AREA EXCLUDED BY tit AUGUST 11,2020 CITY COUNCILAPPROVAL; r SUBIECTT❑FUTURE APPLCATEONS. ti oCKiP+IEM I EI(h/F I NICFiOCr- j -4 II k lulus I z 1� 1 ti ELMEHJ2F.W. _-_--IBM 1 _ 1 N •I 1 1 ! k s 4 _I— V 1 I _ - 1 - I i }I � 1 FJTI 1 / M•T1.tPlr:ri1 X i 1 I C c CONCEFTURL.WEVECTT9 CHANGE _ AUGUST 18,2U20 r Page 20 Page 257 Item#6. B. Annexation Legal Deser-iption & Exhibit MV Page 21 Page 258 Item#6. C. Rezone Legal Description & Exhibit Map r I E_AMITY RD_ � - - + 1 NAP Lu .• R-8 RA - - - :7zzzm- APEX NORTHWEST SUBDIVISION PRE-PLAT IIpuu R-15 IrTm — C-C E.LAKE HAZEL Rt)_ III NAP w J 3 = APEX SOUTHEAST SUBDIVISION PRE-PLAT 0 1000 2000 3000 km Plan Scale:1'=1000' E N G I N E E R I M G 9M NEST snare STRM eas[inAH0Ea7Ls PHONE 321WI E39E939 APE(SU B DI VISI O N k njilp— MERIDIAN,IDAHO DATE: AUGUSTZMD PRUI ECT: 21HX7 SHEET_ OVERALL PROJECT VICINITY MAP 1 OF 1 Page 22 Page 259 Item#6. km 9233 WEST STATE STREET I BOISE,ID 837'14 1 208.639,6939 1 FAX 208.639.5930 April 2,2020 Project No.2M17 Exhibit A Legal Description for Rezone to R-8-North Apex Subdivision A portion of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4,a portion of the Southeast 1/4 and a portion of the Northeast 114 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 31,Township 3 North, Range 1 East, B.M., City of Merldian,Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Center of said Section 31,thence following the northerly line of said Southeast 1/4 of Section 31, N89"57'56"E a distance of 2,601-37 feet to a brass cap marking the East 114 corner of said Section 31; Thence leaving said northerly line and following the easterly line of said Southeast 1/4,500"32'22NE a distance of 1,419.94 feet; Thence leaving said easterly Iiae,N89°42'21"W a distance of 1,423.17 feet; Thence 500°16'52"W a distance of SMOG feet; Thence NS9°42'2VW a distance of 1,1.98-50 feet to the westerly line of said Southeast 1/4; Thence following said westerly line, N00°16'52"E a distance of 682.44 feet to the Center-South 1f 15 corner of said Section 31; Thence leaving said westerly line,SS9-52'0S"E a distance of 62.50 feet; Thence NOW 16'52"E a distance of 895.00 feet; Thence 199.42 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 280M feet, a delta angle of 40"48'25",a chord bearing of N20°07'20"W and a chord distance of 195.23 feet; Thence N40"31'33"W a distance of 241-33 feet; Thence 198.79 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 230.00 feet, a delta angle of 49'31'13", a chord bearing of N65"17'09"W and a chord distance of 192.66 feet to the southerly tine of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 31; Thence fallowing said southerly line,S89'57'15"W a distance of 980.26 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Center-West 1/16 corner of saGd Section 31; Thence Leaving said southerly line a nd fo Vow!ng the westerly line of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4, NOO"25'36"E a distance of 1,558.66 feet; Thence leaving said westerly line, N81°55'55"E a distance of 518.76 feet; Thence 56.28 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 58.GO feet,a delta angle of 55"35'50",a chord bearing of 520°49'52"E and a chord distance of 54.10 fleet; Thence 546°52M"E a distance of 45.40 feet; Thence 554'18'10"E a distance of 180.18 feet; Thence 16 1.54 feet along the arc of a circular cu rve to the left,said curve having a radius of 588.00 feet, a delta angle of 15"44'26",a chord bearing of 562°10'23"E and a chord distance of 161.03 feet; Thence S70°02036"E a distance of 107-80feet; Thence S19'57'24"W a distance of 12.00 feet; Thence 570°02'36"E a distance of 14.45 feet; Thence SEW58'05"l;a distance of 207.13 feet; Thence S65a32'50"E a distance of 188.57 feet to the easterly line of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4; Page 23 Page 260 Item#6. Thence following said easterly fine,50O°39'17"W a distance of 1,140.13 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 144.79 acres, more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit 9 and by this reference is hereby made a part of, NIL Is 12459 4,17 L. BN rr. � SSr�"C�'�* HUM I/4 MWER s� N% 31�xR6G38'17� � vV ZCa 9RhBS UP ru c °S Y Er3T 1!1 'O0"40 Ey # SECTION 31 w FQNT OF BEG!hNNG § p :3 6/6+INCH RM4R Ili W 3/'� CEP cc E:ERTpt OF SEC170W 31 9►SI or 9EJYi21kv Qu y{ QN.29' NW57'5Er 2ICL 601.37 ST75r FAO#o2 31 m Q r �ALWIFUM CAP +� *UT 1/d CNNE C 5whok 11 N4jr31'53-w 'G 20.33' Rezone Area: 144-78t AC- All pF 5113124�454a&punbn of R7&Z422CWJ r W S113143720DS1181438400 SL511314172SI � �s4 Current Zoniri -RUT&R'4 # . I PropoSLd Zoning:R-8 g h.1`e. wkex� #R116.'1 COST - — — — — — — F — — — — — — — — SHEET: 6�9-NCH i R 1 +✓8��231'4 1#g3 t7' l F C-s 1/10 CORNER f Z n iy OF 9ECRIN 31 e g m I r�EP+Y�1`rr 101.156' ` I /y ��/��yy,��II n�ya�yy V 3013 6011 I V G`4FGYfGM` 7UhT i 'i.�tik.i> 4197 YR}I 71011 lr+Lk I SCALE- I'�hEQQ' '11 m!1 16, Page 24 Page 261 Item#6. kin 9233 WEST STATE STREET I BOISE,ID 83714 I 208,639,b934 I PAX 208-M-6930 APr[I Z,2020 Project No-2"17 UhlbitA Legal 17esoription fur Rezone to R$-South ApexSubdlwi$1an A parcel of land situated in a portion of the West 1f 2 of the Fforthwe5t 1/4 of Section 5 and a portiori of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 5,Township 2 North, Range 1 East 0.M-,City Qf Meridian, Ada County,Idaho and heing more particularly described as foilows: Commen Ceing at a brass cap rnaricl ng the co rner cam more to Sections 5 anti 6,Township 2 No rth,Ra nge 1 East and Sectons 31 artd 32,Townsh ip 3 North, Range 1 Ea st which bears S89"42'2I'E a dicta nce of 2,640.00 feet from a 5f8-Inch rebar marking the#forth 1f4 corner of said Section 6,thence following the easterly line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Se€tian 6,S00$04'351E a distance 4661-39 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence teaving said easterly lin€,N89°53`42"€a diSta nCe of 966.03 Feet; Thence W1'51'13"E a distance of 547-17 feet W the easterly Ilne of said West 1{2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5; Thence following said easterly line.SO4'01'43°E a distanceof,1,423.96feel to the Center-Wiest 1/16 earner of said Section 5, Thence leaving said easterly line and followng the southerly line of Bald Vilest 1f 2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5,N89°52'3$"W a KWtOACe Of 1r329.65 fee tto a bras tap marking the West 1}4€ornerof said Section 5(East 1/4 corner of saF1 Section 6); Thence laavlrog said southerly line of the West 1 f2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5 a rid fallowing the southerly line of said East 112 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 6,N89°22'50"W a distance of 1304-25 feet; Thence leaving said southerly Liner N00`43'55`W a distance Of 111-26 feet; The nre N00°M23`W a distance of5 9.25 feet; Thence N97134'26"tin+a distance of 1149 feet to the westerly line of said East 1{3 of the Northeast T 4 of Section 6; The nee following said westerly Ene,Pt00'02'46"W a distance of 66,73 feet to the westerly rfgltt-cf-way line of the Rawson Cana]; Thence leaving said westerly lm-a and followl rig said westerly right-of-way Iine the followingcourses: 1, N78"25'55"E a distance of 161.21 Feet; 2, N54'55'2WE a distance of 74,17 feet; 3. N31°51'12"E a distance of 92.01 feet 4, N10'2S'1D"Ea distance of381,33feeti 5- N05°26'52oW a distance of 105,26 feet; 6- N18'56'2W)JV a distance of 287.65 feet; 7. N32'CG'38"W a distance of 91.83 feet; B. N61432'57"W a distance of 104.61 feet; 9- N74'59'05"Yy a dlstanoe of 44M feet,- Thence Leaving said westerly right-of-way line, NOO°02'06"1N a distance of 396.78 feet; ENGiNEEl{S I SURVEYORS PLANNERS Page 25 Page 262 Item#6. Thence SB9°42'20"E a distance ckf 796.96 feet; Thence 504*&4'35"r a dlstarice of 252.00feet; Thence 589'42'20"E a distance DI`473.4i7 feet to the easterly line of said East V2 of the Northeast V4 of Section 45{westerly I ine of said WoGt 1/2 of the Northwest 1{4 of 5ectia n 5}; Thence following sold easterly nine(and said westerly line), N0G'44'35'W a dlstanceof$4.63 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Sald parcel contains a total of 119.28 acres,more pr less. Attached hereto is Exhlblt 6 and by this refereow is hereby made a part of. 12459 •2,0 3,0 PAGE 2 Page 26 Page 263 Item#6. BASIS OF BEARING ri o 31 9'42'21"E 2640.00' E 1AKE HAZEL RD 31 32 T.3N.. RA E. n 6 5 T.ZN., R.1 E. 5 8-INCH REBAR POINT OF COMMENCEMENT I s/e—INCH REeAR BRASS CAP WEST 1/16 CORNER T -c -0 -c NORTH 1/4 CORNER NW CORNER SECTION 5 -2 SECTION 5 AND stCncN 6 NE CORNER SECTION 6 �' SECTION 32 a x� O iv t�7 a m c � `n I POINT OF S89'42'20"E 796.96' a 6EGINNING O , N89'53'42"E 965.03' 4- V) o 589'42'20"E L11 L9 473.40' LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE QXj 3 (8 CL 1= a Rezone Area: 119.28t AC. Ll N8734'26"W 13.49 m < z u N15'56'20"W Portion of 51406110015, 2B7.65' L2 NO'02'08"W 66.73 ± c All of 51406110350 and m o a Portion of S1445212410 L3 N78'25'55"E 161.21 0 s � � Current Zoning:R-4 L4 N54TM'20"E 74.17 N LU Proposed Zoning:R-8 c _ L5 N31'51'12"E 92.61 LU iO ^ Iti L6 0'28'52V 106.26 Z N o5v M L7 N32'08'38'W 91.83 W� L8 N61'32'57"W 104.61 �' MpRCH39I9 L4 h N T�I r PaaEt7. 20-D17 Ln 1�' o Ln L9 N74'59'05"W 44.02 SHEEP Ll o 0 LIG SO'04'35"E 252.00 1 OF 1 u' L1 i N704'35"W 84.63 NOO'20'23-W 549.25' L12 N59'22'50"W 17.75 I D 20❑ 4�❑ Boo BRASS CAP i W 1/4 CORNER SECTION 5 1/2-INCH REBAR SCALE: 1"- 00' E 1/4 CORNER SECTION 6 EEMMEIon C-E 1/16 CORNER N0O'43'55"W C—W 1/16 CORNER ENGWEEkS.SukVEYORS_PIANNERS SECTION 6 111.26' SECION 9F33 WE5TSTATESrREEf N89'22'50"14 1304,25' 6 5 N89'52'38"W 1329.65' 9043E IQ4HO B3714 L12 RnxH Im91$c�9 63�039 Page 27 Page 264 Item#6. km 9233 WEST STATE STREET I BDISE,ID 83714 1 208.639.6939 l FAX 20&639.6930 April 29,2020 Project No,20-017 Exhibit A Legal Description for Rezone to R-15 Apex 5ubdivi5ion A parcel of land situated in a portion of the South 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 31 and a portion of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32,Township 3 North,Range 1 East,B.M.,and a portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 6,Township 2 North, Range 1 East B.M.,al I situated in the City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho anti heing more particularly described as follows- BEGINNING at a 5/8-Inch rebar marking the corner common to Section 31,Township 3 North,Range 1 East,and Section 6,Township 2 North,Range 1 East,which bears N89°42'21"E a distance of 2,640.00 feet from a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Southeast 1/4 corner of said Section 31; Thence following the westerly line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 31,N00°16'52"E a distance of 660.00 feet; Thence leaving said westerly line,589°42'21"E a distance of 1,198.50 fleet; Thence N40"15'52"E a distance of G20.00 feet; Thence 589°42'21"E a distance of 1,971.82 feet to the easterly boundary of the Farr Lateral; Thence following said easterly boundary the following courses: 1. 64.48 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve hawing a radius of 110.00 feet,a delta angle of 33°35'03",a chard hearing of 505°50'15"W and a chord distance of 63.55 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 2. 51ti`57'45"E a distance of 410.17 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 3. 114.95 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 140.00 feet, a delta angie of 47"02'41",a chord bearing of S34*29'08"E and a chord distance of 111.75 feet to a 1/7-inch rebar, 4. S58'00'31"E a distance of 219.85 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 5. S69`55'45"E a distance of 503.32 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar on the easterly line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32; Thence following said easterly line,S00'10'02"E a distance of 430.90 feet to the southerly line of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32; Thence following said southerly line,N89'57'46"W a distance of 641.22 feet; Thence N00°06'18"W a distance of 124.99 feet; Thence N47°51'44"W a distance of 797.36 feet; Thence N89°42'21"W a distance of 775.42 feet; Thence 500°16'52"W a distance of 1,154.01 feet; Thence N89°42'2WW a distance of 587.77 feet; Thence N00°02'06"W a distance of 494.01 feet to the southerly line of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 31; Thence following said southerly line,NS9°42'2VW a distance of 10370,00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Page 28 Page 265 Item#6. Said parcel contains a total of 76.93 acres, more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is hereby Trade a part of. OF L >13 .7-41.so LEGEND FOUND BRASS CAP � � o/6-wcri Ri±o,uh A CALLI RJtrEIs FGW Ln y, REZONE EGLWAff . JL 2 0 500 1000 1500 '� a E7t1S11NG R%RC 1 Lw1E cc -- — =SECTION LINE Plan Seale.1"+500' 91 '' o CURVE TALE NAY€ RADLG LEWNWM DELI Ct+E}pDBAG tE cTsa Cu 3 C2 14¢_Ot}r 11493' �7'�2'A1` 34`2 'G9"E 111-3 ' m C $W42'21'E 197TM X I 13 3 i1 a z Reams Area_M.921 Ar. * z parkloe$7,131�36�00,51733i#7 C O 511.3141775 L.51 133335EM.A SI&MIM15 CL✓rtnk 29f'"q'le-1 .ten Lr O $ fapoudZonir IF15 ;n SALTi2'31� i 5{I' 5SOd 3l'E 775.42' 219 85' NW-42'211R SS rw.t7tk Cr +rwmy�oc_ La I. } 2:r�o�o�ol}'se�r ONSIS OF BEARING z b N99'42'21'W 13711AM' ,ram+ T.7N.. R.IE. 5 .5. A-W E4I. €LAKE HAZEL All POR11 OF L3EGBINING 3 80SS 1y1P km $E ccgm] 5/9-INCH RtSAR S RICH I R o a SECTION 31 -WEST 1/15 CORNER SOUTH 1/4 CUfi?IER SECTION 3' v SECTUH 5 AND 32 ik9&EEar SuMYDAi t%�4R• 59�,�' YtlYfeit i iAe Siaa:r I� ��nwrG8575� tAr E'+W alhava? Page 29 Page 266 Item#6. km 9233 WEST 5TA7E STREET I 8015E,Ip 83714 1 208,639.6939 1 FAX 208.639.6930 April 29,2020 Project No,20-017 Exhibit A Legal Description for Rezone to C-C Apex Subdivision A parcel of land situated in a portion of the southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 31,a portion of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32,Township 3 North, Range 1 East,13-K,and a portion of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5,and a portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 6, Township 2 North,Range 2 East S.M.,all situated in the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a brass cap marking the Northwest corner of Section 5, Township 2 North,Range 1 East, which hears N89'57'04"W a distance of 1,331.87 feet from a found 5/8-inch rebar marking the West 1/16 corner of said Sections 5 and 32; Thence following the northerly line of said Northwest 1/4,S89°57'04"E a distance of 690,66 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing along said northerly line,S89"57'04"E a distance of 541,21 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar marking the west 1116 corner of said Sections 5 and 32; Thence leaving said northerly line and following the easterly line of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 5,S00°01'43"E a distance of 250.92 feet to a point; Thence leaving said easterly line,S41"51'13"W a distance of 547,17 feet to a point; Thence S89°53'42"W a distance of 966.03 feet to a point on the westerly line of said Northwest 1/4; Thence following said westerly line,N00*04'35"W a distance of 167.37 feet to a point; Thence leaving said westerly line,N89°42'20"W a distance of 682.5E feet to a{point; Thence N00"16'52"E a distance of 1,154.01 feet to a point; Thence S89"42'21"E a distance of 775.42 feet to a paint; Thence S47*51'44"E a distance of 797.36 feet to a point; Thence S00°06'18"E a distance of 125.13 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 43.28 acres,more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is hereby made a part of. 12 597-0 Page 30 Page 267 Item#6. BRASS CAP 43 EA!r t/4 CGRNER ode =W.CTION 31 3� 31 � - e� � S&W4f21-E 775-4 d � q 0 3U Goo goo U � o c 'r+"}. Plan$Celle;1"=36 O C g ' 4 �a POINT OF COMMENCEMENT $ SJ$ REBAR � X m W f411ND BRASS CAP i �pQpp'i� YYVf 1/14 CORNER ui m T FE' CORNER 59C110QN 31 12S,1S' SECTIONS S & 32 Q 31 — $69'42'21�E 31 3 T-RLLf g. 647 -6Q' _ SB9'57'G4'E 841.21` wI 6 m 254C1.D ' T,2N„ RJE 1331,87 L u E LA4E HAZEL RO $ PONT 15F peal»mmO 0AS15 OF BEARING *6 Z 258.92' w Rezoe Area:43.28±AC rn� Ponian o1 Sii]i41725f.StL3232SOM. Si4OS223MOD&SiaOfii�Wi ,� 4 [uncut AnhM:kh I Q Peobc"i�!Milt.L-L nary h'�i�'i26 Ne4 'x014 92.58' NOi!0�'3s YI k SHEET: �xn* 157,37' 59B'6S'42� 06�.0.3' � LCCE 'b I FOUND URASS CAP ID B/B-LNCH RE&W I 1 A WCIJ ATO PQINT RE.ZONE BOJACARY #YGwttfS.irbeHpo. iMwu!r ff Q EV571NC PAICEL LINE M'mq"um — — — —SE1;MN LIN>: iMaf Page 31 Page 268 DEMELOPMEW .wY MIN DeAwmm FUME In SJEMEE �-r - Item#6. Northwest: APEX NORTHWEST SUBDIVOON PRELIMINARY PLAT A PORT1011QF 7HESDJFH IP43F THESIDUTHEAST V4AN0 HORTFffAT L14 OF THE !Oufi4CFSt 1f14F x0xm]LT rM!,M 3N0PTPL PIF+GC 1 r,*'?. {I7Y4F IAERIDPIL 19A COUNTY,IOMIO I KZL— F- wwa+w� Gi_ r - A �1 =1; Litz. I 3si X= ib 941 �:�- Fm_ ,, -11 Page 33 Page 270 Item#6. . k 3 y }{i ---- {•i 1�.�..� .-�� 1+ �' s � Imo_ — r y � ? PEW Y Y-y- k r �JG i �!-1 8 1 � _ Y A J L t T Q a • � � �E :�� I ' i �i�� ft�YY�Y4� f +�q L � y Page 34 Page 271 Item#6. Phasing Plan: APEX Northwest Phasing ConceprWf/Subject to Chan • 1 ID- - � 1 - ..,.+.+ ....�. : 1 —— F b I� l Southeast: APEX 5OLItHEA#t9UBMI51QH PRELIMINARY PLA7 — x�ro�u.exo srruxrte ix ire ncsr ir:a ixr.rwusrxo i va o gr•usrt s. v ra�r�+gku;�rr��s!ar.cvw saxau{xue miixir,i¢srn �S' _iL •K E k . .it —Sri- �• —. _ _ Page 35 Page 272 Eil �j I f *'Ol i h I I I � I � i .•�r I 4.r f A7. r�l! s it A t a 4 r�r � $ � •czTwaareJ-vr�=�� I i t g i �5 Y� I � •1lJ1::J •rJ 8 Page 36 EE Item#6. AE ��. •--� � � .rug �� i _ _A i 2 1 a 4 4,i 2.lT so 2.12. � ��oaea9m�nc�waG. IWL .. I I I � � '•� - �. � � ,F2 i Page 37 Page 274 Item#6. Phasing Plan: APEX Southeast Phasing E.LARL I IAZL_RD. muMCkCMLIC{I COMMMaAL*C} D f AYFq TY �4 L Q 1 / � o ='- —1— —►� �' (-3) ID J Q d 4 a w — p ao E ;:� !5?+R:ST. � RESI�F7JilAL iR9il Gy E.STAGE Si. C, r3 ® ® f➢ Q1 ® ® ® Ci F3 E SPIRE ST: o 0 o s r t E 1NM.ErMMI fIUN'� l7 49 E.AMaJTION ST. 0 o e F.AMM..ST.. t-� E APWCE ST. p 9 — � fiS hl I 0 C7 � r � g ® O 0 g E b] 9 � E.AbVENTURf ST. e v Page 38 Page 275 Item#6. E. Landscape Plan(date: 4/30/2020) Northwest: yj .C ` E�nera9tRimame— --— — - _ � "leer •r.�s�yea"�sris� �� s - tt3arars a -xs. 0 PPF2,4 PPC 3,4 dy -nW 29 flu I aeoy,wa�n�m+a wo n.Axo rc-.a �. _ I Q14}7kL1 f4L'tl h�I.� 41IY.kT171CQ11 dCYi7 InwL7EeafESITEw.a�l ,o,w';�� a;� • I a:r •• •I IL�" 4E�.4]If+MRYT�AdMYU.I — HE�L.I.a ISW.4 k 7ie� 41 Page 39 Page 276 Item#6. ----- ---- — ------------ ------ IMIIMAP VlAh �E_ hNFCH LI7J! S:"u;k�w"l.? _ WITCH UIE-SEE 5NkE7 ak3,P ............... .................. ......ii...... ................. . .- r• 7tl ifs is i ''LF-13i-'� 't M1y F, . A0-. Page 40 Page 277 Item#6. Southeast: n�Ea�clu.nlunocp�� it � � �� -�'�� _� �---—�— -• - - - , �` r IL Qf�1�ALE711l6 P u!L + a: i PPL3.D PPL4.0 PP14.4 k� _T _y.�'- } ! � � ��_ �•�+Eov en l yam. S Y � o I r t}t - - rullr LY.. -.'!—.� ;ice _ •- -t S.,_'. __' mEa7.maeQEcxs nr. +� I I iE¢�YEIQEIIQ LJWCIiLAPCSffCRAN Ran EP 3QV fr^ iEL�.i__ r3_ Wes. '� - =mkt �-•�� — i#LS�Gl00YFR3 Page 41 Page 278 Item#6. � u i �.r I '�I I {ti°04f:3:##{io�i:ic{{off ---------YY'I I1},hSC/lf-0LadF IAAT4iM SAF SHEUE730 �/l� lrlr:+6'1 91WRW1 YapMIFEdir wwww wv..ilk.w_ro -, MAI I'll I IEJ-'IIE itIM t 92A ----- ____.___I: - ----- i ----- ___ ..�.. ��....� ...� �_ C§ W-.A- R�l- � .��.... Y .�.... • l�hI HCJIPk PLhN =��1�-�E3FEEfP119A ' x57d Page 42 Page 279 WAR H LGWI-SEE SHlrr PP3.0 P!, F, C•i -7Y X- R- ...... . ....... . 3 1 .... ... LMVDSCME PLAN Page 43 F. Qualified Open Space Exhibit(dated: Alareh May 2020) - REVISED Northwest: APEX NORTHWEST SUBDIVISION OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT U ... . .......- r---------------- - T AM hURTHWM 5UBWRDN Karm", krm I OF I Page 44 Item#6. Southeast: J + r x• - I� p �i 4 g �; - n'� - is •rr :erl ^ - tT _ _ I rm I d +� rm Ln rl y Re a x• y I c •- � � 1!s y: � IL V t 1 9 F z 5' m � m _ x - r - E Page 45 Page 282 G. Conceptual Building Elevations/Renderings YA Meh 445'Arr7e.�ic� .7iiay _ _r IL Apex NW Aesl�enrJ� Alley Apell�JW Rafl$M�4-A>sw AIYlK Apell SF'AesAdevlBJa wpm.". ,r AprxSE i0eS1dGI1tIP1-�ORlYn210Y1P1 �� .*tlCASf Rlrildlr+Gui-Llx�yr'�r,rx+� .'•�[F Y � � �. Page • . 46 aFe�FFBrildenuol rar'enrianad leve,rSfHrefdentleJ-Cvmeziticrmt - ,-.r":�''•-: �.--i : SOMME IIIlku Ilk ,q�Nw commeic+d r�crx hf W ComrnerrJv� r. fix NW rammaxial .. Page 47 P' 7 t+� ti Page 48 Item#6. H. Legal Description&Exhibit Map of Property Subject to New Development Agreement &am 9233 WEST 5fATE STREET I BOISE,ID 83714 1 208.639.6939 J FAk 208,639,6930 August 18,2020 Apex Subdivision Project No.2"17 Legal Description Exhibit A Legal Description for Apex subdivision A parcel of land situated in a portion of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4,all of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 31 and a portion of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32,Township 3 North,Range 1 East, B.M.,all of West 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 Section 5 and a portion of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 6,Township 2 North, Range 1 East 8-M.,all situated in the City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8-inch rebar markingthe Center 1/4 Section 31,Township 3 North,Range 1 East, B.M.,thence following the southerly line o€the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 31, S89°57'15"W a distance of 1,318.94 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Center-West 1/16 corner of said Section 31; Thence leaving said southerly line and following the westerly line of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4, N00"25'36"E a distance of 1,558.65 feet to a point; Thence leaving said westerly line,N81"55'55"E a distance of 518.76 feet to a point; Thence 56.28 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 58,00 feet,a delta angle of 55°35'50",a chord bearing of S20'49'52"E and a chord distance of 54.10 feet to a point; Thence 546°52'43"E a distance of 45.40 feet to a point; Thence 554°18'10"E a distance of 180.18 feet to a point; Thence 161.54 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 558,00 feet, a delta angle of 15'44'26",a chord bearing of$62°10'23"E and a chord distance of 161.03 feet to a point; Thence 570°02'36"E a distance of 107.90 feet to a point; Thence 519"57'24"W a distance of 12.00 feet to a point; Thence S70"02'36"E a distance of 14.45 feet to a point; Thence 551'58'05"E a distance of 207.13 feet to a point; Thence 555'32'50"E a distance of 188.57 feet to a point on the easterly line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 said Section 31; Thence following said easterly line,500"38'17"W a distance of 1,14D.13 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of43.744 acres,more or less. TOGETHER WITH: BEGINNING at 5/8-inch rebar marking the Center 1/4 Section 31,Township 3 North,Range 1 East,B.M., thence following the northerly line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 31, N89'57'56"E a distance of 2,601.37 feet to a brass cap marking the East 1/4 corner of said Section 31; Thence leaving said northerly line and Following easterly line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 31, 500"32'22"E a distance of 226.25 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar on the centerline of Farr Lateral; ENGINECRS I SURVEYORS I PLANNERS Page 49 Page 286 Item#6. Thence leaving said easterly line and following the centerline of said Farr Lateral the fallowing seven (7) courses: 1. S38"43'32"E a distance of 61.71 feet to a point; 2 S51"12'32"E a distance of 444.04 feet to a point; 3. SW36'10"E a distance of 272.66 feet to a point; 4. S86'04'31"E a distance of 206.22 feet to a point; 5. 573°45'13"E a distance of 301.51 feet to a point; S. 543'15'53"E a distance of 313.14 feet to a point; 7 S29°01'13"E a distance of 37.13 feet to a point on the easterly line of the West 112 of the Southwest 1/4 said Section 32; Thence leaving said centerline and following the easterly tine of the West 1/Z of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 32,500°08'25"E a distance of 206.12 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar on the easterly boundary of said Farr Lateral; Thence leaving said easterly lire and following the easterly boundary of said Farr Lateral the fallowing twelve(12)courses: 1. 22.57 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 144.57 feet,a delta angle of 08"56'24 ,a chord bearing of S55°50'40"W and a chord distance of 22.55 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 2. S5YM54"W a distance of 91.61 feat to a 1/2-inch rebar; 3. 122.47 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 220.00 feet, a delta angle of 31'5339",a chord bearing of 577'15'42"W and a chord distance of 120.89 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 4 N86°47'31"W a distance of 362.95 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 5. 583�47'06"W a distance of 26.72 feet to a 1/2-Inch rebar; fi 569"57'44"W a distance of 12&97 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 7. 90.59 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 110.00 feet,a delta angle of 47°20'30",a chord bearing of 546'18'02"W and a chord distance of 88.33 Beet to a point; S. 64.48 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 110.00 feet,a delta angle of 33935'03", a chord bearing of S05°50'15"W and chord distance of 63.56 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 9. S10°5745"E a distance of 410.17 feet to a V2-inch rebar; 10. 114,95 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 140.00 feel;,a delta angle of 4702'41", a chard bearing of 534°29'08"E and a chord distance of 111.75 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 11. S58"00'31"E a distance of 219.85 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 12. 569°55'45"E a distance of 503.32 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar on the easterly line of the West 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 of said Section 32; Thence leaving said easterly boundary and fallowing easterly line of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 2/4 of said Section 32,SWIM"E a distance of 431.17 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar common to Section 5,Township 2 North Range 1 East, B.M.,and Section 32,Township 3 North Range 1 East, B.M.; Thence leaving said easterly line and following the easterly line of the West 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 5,500°01'43"E a distance of 2,672.88 feet to the Center-West 1/16 corner of said Section 5; PAGE 12 Page 50 Page 287 Item#6. Thence leaving said easterly line and following the southerly line of the West 112 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 5,N89*W'38"1+V a distance of 1,329.65 feet to a brass cap common to Sections 5 and 6; Thence leaving said southerly line and following the southerly line of the East 112 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 6,N89"22'5WW a distance of 1,304.25 feet to a point; Thence leaving said southerly line,NOOa43'55"W a distance of 111.26 feet to a point; Thence lNDT20'23"W a distance of 549.25 feet to a point; Thence N87p3426"W a distance of 13.49 feet to the westerly line of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 6; Thence following the westerly line of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 6, N00°02'06"W a distance of 66.73 feet to a point on the westerly right-of-way line of the Rawson Canal; Thence leaving said westerly line and following the westerly right-of-way line of said Rawson Canal the following nine(9)courses: 1. N78`25'55"E a distance of 161.21 feet to a point; 2. N54°55'20"E a distance of 74.17 feet to a point; 3. N31"51'12"E a distance of 92.01 feet to a point; 4. 1\110"25'10"E a distance of 331.33 feet to a point; S. N05"26'52"W a distance of 105.26 feet to a point; 6. N18"56'20"W a distance of 287.65 feet to a paint; 7_ N32°08'38"W a distance of 91.83 feet to a point; 8. N61a32'57"W a distance of 104.61 feet to a point; 9. N7454'05"W a distance of 44.02 feet to a point; Thence leaving said westerly right-of--way line, N00'02'0Es'W a distance of 890.79 feet to a point on the northerly line of the}Northeast 1/4 of said Section 6; Thence following said northerly line,N8942'21"w a distance of 1,370,O0 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar common to Section 6,Township 2 North lunge I East,R-M., and Section 31,Township 3 North Range 1 East,B.M.; Thence leaving said northerly line and following the westerly line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 31, N00°16'52"E a distance of 1,342.44 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Center-South 1/16 cornerof said Section 31; Thence N00"16'52"E a distance of 1,342.44 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, Said parcel contains a total of 366.194 acres,more or less. Said description contains a total of 409.938 acres,more or less. 12 459 4 OF % PAGE 13 Page 51 Page 288 Item#6. S18.76 nSl°55'SS"� - r 'tT•wf�t8 rA• f 8 �s e W. x�f w rn w 3 � m sS9°57'15'w 1318.94 Title: Apex Subdivision Date: 08-17-2020 Scale: 1 inch=300 feet File: 200817 Apex Subdivision Legal 20-017 Tract 1: 43.744 Acres: 1905504 Sq Feet:Closure=s57.2522w 0.01 Feet Precision=1/627918: Perimeter 5510 Feel 001=s89.5715w 1318.94 006=s54.1810e 180.18 01 1—s61.5805e 207.13 002-n00.2534e 1558.66 a s��1 iei 03 0 1 2=s65.3250e 19337 003=01.5555e 518.76 008�S70A236e 107.80 013=00.3817w 1140.13 u61; R=5B160,n1!IVII3550 009=s 19.5724w 12.00 & 6_-0432�Chd�Sd.lD 005=A6.5243e 45A0 010==-7fl,0236e 14A5 Page 52 Page 289 Item#6. 1 2601.37 09°57'56"e f � v ni +e r O C � v a N ry _� � jJ SP3� n89°42'2I"w 137000 z3 �O 0 S.J log S f e.5 m v cv ri 4o r o N O 1 � n89°z2'S4'w a$4°52'3$"w 1304.25 1324.65 Tittle: Apex Subdivision Date. 08-18-2020 Scale; 1 inch= 1000 feet File:200817 Apex Subdivision Legal 20-017 Tract 1: 366.194 Acres: 15951396 5q Few:Clvsurt�s50.3758e 0.02 Feet Precis'tan>11999999: Perimettr= 19597 Fcet 001=n89.5756e 2601.37 016=s69.5744w 128.97 031=08.2555e 16L21 1)17:L.L R=I M19,0 odla 47 pw002= 00.3222e 226.26 tea ;a 032=n4.5S20e 74.17 nRN2wa n s5o003= 38,4332e 61.71 �d-63.56 033=01.5112e 92.01 004=s5I A 232e 444.04 019=sI0.5745e 410.17 034�n10.2510e 381.33 005=s60.3614e 272.66 I.aS oza;rile=lao.na o�: �.�a1 035= 05.2652w 106,26 e,Is�a.24osa c1a=l I 006-s86.043Ia 206.22 021=s58,003 le 219.85 036�nI8.5620w 287.65 007=s73,4513e 301.51 022-s69.5545e 503.32 037--T132.0838w 91.93 008=s43.1553e 313.74 023=500.1002e 431.17 038�n61.3257w 104.61 009,s29.0113e 37A3 024=s00.0143e 2672.88 039=n74.5905w 44.02 010=s00.0825e 206-12 025�n89.5238w 1329.65 040-00,0206w$90.79 011:Rt R-144.67 UGI[Ia, 1a.56=4 026-n89.225Qw 1304.25 041=n89.42.21w 1370.00 Hog�56.5a40xr,4'1d°23.53 012=s61.1854w 91.61 027=n00-4355w 111.26 042=00.1652e [342.44 013:1;c R-224. Del[.-31.5339 028mn40.2023w 549.25 043�00.1652e 1342.44 014=n86.4731w 362.95 029--n87.3426w 13.49 015-s83.4746w 26.72 030� 00.020bw 66.73 Page 53 Page 290 Item#6. IX. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. The subject property shall no longer be subject to the terms of the existing Development Agreements (H-2015-0019: Brighton Investments,LLC—Inst. #2016-007072; SCS Brighton,LLC—Inst. #2016- 007073; Murgoitio Limited Partnership—Inst. #2016-007074)upon the property owner(s) entering into a new agreement. The new DA shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the City within six(6)months of City Council granting the subject modification. The new DA shall include the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the conceptual master plan, conceptual building elevations,preliminary plat,phasing plan,landscape plan, and qualified open space exhibits included in Section VIII and the provisions contained herein. b. Future preliminary plats shall include collector streets consistent with those shown on the Master Street Map, as required by Ada County Highway District. c. The land designated as Medium High-Density Residential(MHDR) on the Future Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan zoned R-15 shall develop with a variety of residential dwellings (i.e. single-family detached/attached,townhouses,condominiums,and/or apartments)at a gross density ranging from eight(8)to twelve(12)dwelling units per acre. Development shall incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place and shall incorporate connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways, attractive landscaping and a project identity consistent with the Comprehensive Plan(see pg. 3-10). d. Prior to development of the Mixed Use—Community(MU-C) designated areas shown on the Master Plan as"future development,"the Development Agreement shall be amended to include a conceptual development plan that demonstrates consistency with the general guidelines for Mixed Use developments and specifically the MU-C designation(see pgs. 3-13 and 3-15 thru 3-16). e. The rear and/or side of structures on lots that face E. Lake Hazel Rd. and S. Locust Grove Road, arterial streets, and S. Vertex Way,E. Tower St.,E. Crescendo St., S.Apex Ave. and E. Via Roberto St.,collector streets, shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches, balconies,material types,or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. f. Development within the Williams Pipeline easement shall comply with the Williams Developers' Handbook. g. All future development, except for single-family detached dwellings, is required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. h. The Murgoitio property(Parcel#S 1406110110)located southwest of the E. Lake Hazel/S. Locust Grove Road intersection shall be included in a future subdivision of the surrounding property (Parcel#S1406110350 or#S1406110015)in order to establish a legal division of land. Or,if a parcel division was approved by Ada County for the current configuration of the property,proof of such shall be submitted to the Planning Division with a future subdivision application for the surrounding property. i. The lot pfoposed to be afmexed(i.e. Lot > Bleek 1, fi*tufe de.'elopment; or-,the entire lot shall be ineitided in a f6ttffe subdivision. if a pr-epef�y Page 54 Page 291 Item#6. division is appr-eved by Ada Gou*ty,pf:eef of sueh shall be submiAed to the Plaffi"ing Division j. Multi-use pathways shall be provided with development as required by the Park's Department in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. k. The commercial(C-C zoned)portions of this development are allowed to obtain building permits prior to subdivision of the property. 2. The final plat submitted for Apex Northwest shall incorporate the following: a. Include a note stating direct lot access via E. Lake Hazel Rd., S. Locust Grove Rd., E. Crescendo St. and S. Apex Ave. is prohibited, except for those accesses approved by City of Meridian and Ada County Highway District. b. The north/south alley in Block 5 does not comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3B.5 as the entire length of the alley is not visible from a public street as required; common driveways may be considered as an alternative to the alley provided they meet the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D, subject to alternative compliance approval. c. Depict minimum 20-foot wide street buffers along E. Crescendo St. and S. Apex Ave., collector streets, in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.2. d. Cross-access easements shall be depicted between all commercial lots in the subdivisions in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A.2. 3. The final plat submitted for Apex Southeast shall incorporate the following revisions: a. Include a note stating direct lot access via E. Lake Hazel Rd., S. Locust Grove Rd., E. Tower St. S. Vertex Way and E.Via Roberto St. is prohibited, except for those accesses approved by City of Meridian and Ada County Highway District. b. Depict minimum 20-foot wide street buffers along E. Tower St., S.Vertex Way and E.Via Roberto St., collector streets, in accord with UDC 11-313-7C.2. c. Depict two(2)additional minimum 15-foot wide common lots for micro-path connections to Discovery Park at the east boundary in Block 14. d. Cross-access easements shall be depicted between all commercial lots in the subdivisions in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A.2. 4. The landscape plan submitted with the final plat application for Apex Northwest shall be revised as follows: a. Depict multi-use pathways in accord with the Pathways Master Plan as required by the Park's Dept. in Section IX.E. Landscaping shall be depicted along either side of the pathways as set forth in UDC 11-313-12C. b. Depict landscaping within all required street buffers along arterial and collector streets in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-7C. c. Include a calculations table listing the number of trees required vs. those proposed in common open space areas, street buffers,parkways, and along pathways that demonstrate compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3, 11-313-7C.3, 11-313-12C respectively. d. Include mitigation information for any existing trees proposed to be removed from the site in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-1OC.5. e. If the unimproved right-of-way is 10 feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line,the Developer is required to maintain a 10 foot compacted shoulder meeting the Page 55 Page 292 Item#6. construction standards of ACHD and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.5. A license agreement for improvements within the right-of-way is required between the property owner and ACHD. f. Depict a gazebo with tables and benches as an amenity in Lot 32,Block 5; include a detail of the gazebo. 5. The landscape plan submitted with the final plat application for Apex Southeast shall be revised as follows: a. Depict multi-use pathways in accord with the Pathways Master Plan as required by the Park's Dept. in Section IX.E. Landscaping shall be depicted along either side of the pathways as set forth in UDC 11-313-12C. b. Depict landscaping within all required street buffers along arterial and collector streets in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. c. Include a calculations table listing the number of trees required vs. those proposed in common open space areas, street buffers,parkways, and along pathways that demonstrate compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3, 11-313-7C.3, 11-313-12C respectively. d. Include mitigation information for any existing trees proposed to be removed from the site in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-1OC.5. e. If the unimproved right-of-way is 10 feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line,the Developer is required to maintain a 10 foot compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of ACHD and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.5. A license agreement for improvements within the right-of-way is required between the property owner and ACHD. f. Depict two(2)additional minimum 15-foot wide common lots with 5-foot wide micro-paths in Block 14 at the east boundary; depict landscaping on either side of the pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-12C. g. Depict the children's play equipment proposed in the central common area; include a detail of the play equipment. 6. Future development shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-6, 11-2A-7 and 11-2B-3 for the R-8,R-15 and C-C zoning districts respectively. 7. Off-street parking is required to be provided for residential uses in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 based on the number of bedrooms per unit; and for non-residential uses in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-613.1. 8. An exhibit shall be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks, fencing,building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via common driveways; if a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street,the driveway shall be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D. 9. Address signage shall be provided at the public street for homes accessed via common driveways for emergency wayfinding purposes. 10. A perpetual ingress/egress easement shall be filed with the Ada County Recorder for the common driveways,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D.8. A copy of said easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division with the final plat for City Engineer signature; or,this information may be included in a note on the face of the plat. Page 56 Page 293 Item#6. 11. A 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division for the 10-foot wide multi-use pathways proposed within the site that are not located within right-of-way,prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer for the phase in which they are located. 12. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted and approved prior to submittal of any building permit applications for the swimming pool facility in the residential portion of the development; and for all non-residential/commercial uses and structures.A Design Review application is required to be submitted for single-family attached units; one application can be submitted for the overall development if desired. 13. The qualified open spaee exhibits fOF the residentially zoned portions of Apex Northwest and Apex Southeast shall be revised prior to the Council hearing to only depiet areas that qualify PeF the standaFds listed in UDC 11 3G 3B.if additional qualified needed,the plat should be revised to eompl�- B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 The north-south sewer line in the landscaped area of Block 5 (Apex NW)needs to be moved east to the paved access road. 1.2 No sewer or water lines have been shown to the lots in Block 7 (Apex NW). Each lot will need to have services provided. 1.3 Public Work's preference is to see all water utilities in the public right-of-way(R-O-W),where they can easily be operated and maintained. If the utilities truly cannot be installed in the public right-of- way,then our preference would be for utilities to be located in a dedicated and improved alley. If that cannot be accomplished,the applicant should work with Public Works for further solutions that meet both the developer's design constraints and Public Works'maintenance needs. 1.4 This development will need to be modeled at final plat to verify each phase meets minimum fire flow pressures 1.5 From the preliminary geotechnical investigation of groundwater elevation provided in the application, it appears that groundwater may not be a factor with the development of this subdivision. The initial investigative report is dated April 8,2018, and additional data collection is recommended to confirm actual groundwater levels. Updated data and recommendations from a geotechnical professional shall be required with the submittal of construction design drawings. 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub- grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility,or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Page 57 Page 294 Item#6. Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x 11"map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B)for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals,or drains, exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)898- 5500 for inspections of disconnection of services.Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at(208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits for the residential portions of the development. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C- 3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. Page 58 Page 295 Item#6. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public works.aspx?id=272. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT Northwest: https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WeUink/Doc View.asp x?id=189722&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiiy&cr=1 Southeast: https://weblink.meridiancity.org WWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=189784&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCio! D. POLICE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancioy.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=190778&dbid=0&repo=Meridian CibX E. PARK's DEPARTMENT Northeast: https://weblink.meridianciU.or lWebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=191486&dbid=0&repo=MeridianQU Southeast: https://weblink.meridiancit .00rg/WeUink/Doc View.aspx?id=1914 8 7&db id=0&rep o=Meridia n City Page 59 Page 296 Item#6. F. WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT(WASD) https://weblink.meridianciN.ofg WWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=190290&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiU G. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO(COMPASS) Northwest: https://weblink.meridianciU.ofglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=190975&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiu Southeast: https://weblink.m eridia n c i ty.ory/WeUink/Doc View.aspx?id=19 09 7 7&db id=0&repo=Meridian City H. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) AZ/RZ: https://weblink.meridiancity.orQ/WebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=191226&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCioy Northwest: https://weblink.meridianciU.orglWebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=192784&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiU Southeast: https://weblink.meridianciU.orkIWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=192785&dbid=0&repo=Meridiancity I. BOISE PROJECT BOARD OF CONTROL(BPBC) https://weblink.meridianciU.org/WeUink/DocView.aspx?id=189951&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCitX J. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT(NMID) Northwest: https://weblink.meridianciU.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=190512&dbid=0&repo=Meridian CitX Southeast: https://weblink.meridiancitE.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=190510&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity K. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT Northwest: https://weblink.meridiancitE.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=190604&dbid=0&repo=Meridian CitX Southeast: https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.asp x?id=190605&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity L. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) https://weblink.meridiancioy.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=190598&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiU X. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. hi order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: Page 60 Page 297 Item#6. 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment to RL-2-,-R-8, R-15& C-C and proposed development is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan if the Applicant complies with the provisions in Section IX. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the proposed single-family attached and detached homes with front-loaded and alley-loaded options will contribute to the range of housing opportunities in the City; other residential types may be provided with future phases of development. The City Council finds the commercial portion of the property will provide for the retail and service needs of the community in accord with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment will not result in an adverse impact on the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. designatien in Me Gempi-ehensive Plan and thHs is. in the best intepest of the City.-Not applicable B. Preliminary Plat Findings: In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; The City Council finds that the proposed preliminary plats, with recommended conditions, are in substantial compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density, transportation, and pedestrian connectivity. (Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies in, Section V of this report for more information) 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds that public services will be provided to the subject properties proposed to be subdivided with development. (See Section IX of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers) 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the development at their own cost, the City Council finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. Page 61 Page 298 Item#6. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development based upon comments from the public service providers (i.e., Police, Fire, ACHD, etc). (See Section IXfor more information) 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health,safety or general welfare; and, The City Council is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated with the platting of this property. ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The City Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that exist on this site that require preserving. Page 62 Page 299 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Epic Storage Facility (H-2020- 0058) by Jarron Langston, Located at 1345 W. Overland Rd. Page 300 Item#7. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI DIAN^' AND DECISION&ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Rezone and Conditional Use Permit,by Jarron Langston, Epic Development. Case No(s). H-2020-0058 For the City Council Hearing Date of: August 11,2020 (Findings on August 25, 2020) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11,2020, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11, 2020,incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11, 2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11, 2020, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11,2020, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Epic Storage Facility—FILE#H-2020-0058) - I - Page 301 Item#7. reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Rezone and Conditional Use Permit is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11,2020, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I- 6B-7C). Notice of Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit,when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time,the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting,the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two(2)year period. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-513-6.G.1,the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one(1)two (2)year period. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Epic Storage Facility—FILE#H-2020-0058) -2- Page 302 Item#7. City Code Title 11(UDC 11-513-617). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28)days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521,any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52,Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11,2020 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Epic Storage Facility—FILE#H-2020-0058) -3- Page 303 Item#7. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 25th day of August 2020. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 8-25-2020 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Epic Storage Facility—FILE#H-2020-0058) -4- Page 304 Item#7. Exhibit A STAFF REPORT C: E IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 8/11/2020 LegendM�A DATE: ��Project Location ® � TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Joe Dodson,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 ' SUBJECT: H-2020-0058 e Epic Storage Facility LOCATION: The site is located at 1345 W. Overland Road, in the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of ® v Section 24,Township 3N.,Range 1 W. L PROJECT DESCRIPTION • (RZ) -Rezone of 4.43 acres of land from R-8 zone (Medium-density Residential)to C-G zone (General Retail and Service Commercial)for the purpose of developing commercial storage on the site; • (CUP) -Conditional Use Permit for a 29,400 square foot storage facility and associated outdoor storage on 4.43 acres in the C-G zoning district,by Jarron Langston. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 4.43 acres Future Land Use Designation Commercial and Medium Density Residential Existing Land Use(s) Commercial—County approved Church/Event center Proposed Land Use(s) Commercial Storage Facility Lots(#and type;bldg./common) 2 lots—Commercial building lot Phasing Plan(#of phases) Proposed as one phase Neighborhood meeting date;#of April 21,2020, 1 attendee.Meeting was held via Zoom attendees: due to Covid-19 stay at home orders. History(previous approvals) AZ-04-027;County approved CUP for a Church/Event Center(date unknown). Page 1 Page 305 Item#7. Exhibit A B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) No comments have been received at this time. • Requires ACHD Commission No Action(yes/no) Access(Arterial/Collectors/State Access is proposed via an existing driveway from W. Hwy/Local)(Existing and Proposed) Overland Road,an arterial street. Only a secondary access is proposed(as required by Unified Development Code). Stub Street/Interconnectivity/Cross Secondary access is proposed to the property to the east Access (Sagewood West)via a common drive that will serve as this project's emergency access. Existing Road Network No road network is proposed;drive aisle to existing structures is existing. Existing Arterial Sidewalks/ Yes;Overland Road has existing curb,gutter,and sidewalk Buffers abutting the site. Proposed Road Improvements N/A Distance to nearest City Park(+ Approximately 1 mile to Bear Creek Park(18 acres in size) size) Fire Service • Distance to Fire Station 250 feet from Fire Station#6(the sites abut each other) • Fire Response Time This project lies within the Meridian Fire response time goal of 5 minutes. • Resource Reliability Fire Station#6 reliability is currently unknown due to this station being so new. • Risk Identification Risk Factor 4—commercial with hazards(firefighting in a large commercial building with highly flammable campers, motorhomes,and trailers;this includes oils,fuels,and propane as additional fuel sources) • Accessibility Proposed project meets all required access,road widths, and turnarounds. Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Services Directly adjacent • Sewer Shed South Black Cat Trunkshed • Estimated Project Sewer See application ERU's • WRRF Declining Balance 13.96 • Project Consistent with WW YES Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts/Concerns No proposed changes to Public Sewer Infrastructure have been proposed within this record.Any changes or modifications,to the Public Sewer Infrastructure,shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. Water • Distance to Water Services Directly adjacent • Pressure Zone 3 • Estimated Project Water See application ERU's • Water Quality Concerns This development ends in a long deadend water main which may result in poor water quality.A future Page 2 Page 306 1 1 1 .�=■Illlllr��■ � � no I:non u■-: 84 °1I-I?imm�nmr _ 84' --0V .mm OVERLAND a -AND ' • e - �� /1 - �� pnn � ..r� W I l i LU IFNI Viille:ll mn ern lil 1111111'Q � • i= �u � ..O,A1 Epp ;: •-nn■pZq +• . rN , _ �_ c Np �111 nnl��► in A• i „� - .::prawn . --- ..�pnnnlq■u -p� ■ mq � m:ram � ' 84 °1'-rinmm�nn 84 nu lifinmmmn 1�moon OVER�L-AND � Fes• � OV� r �� go e ran •• `_; e ran '`\ nnemd .nln _n, � � 'ti!Il�unum� w1111Ie'rl ■ ■ran � � � -■ran uuirLU� Nlq� .�u ♦. c lii nuilirW 1 rl -:1� ��w ::nm`Z� :yN �i`� ..•lw mn Z. :yN �.�111111fy mql�=�1111I1i:a ..Ill _ �1lllll�,ii. n NII 111 lll..�,i,► rlr • of Item#7. Exhibit A B. Owner: Same as Applicant C. Representative: Glenn Walker(Architect)— 1891 N. Wildwood Street,Boise, ID 83713 IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper Notification 6/19/2020 7/24/2020 Radius notification mailed to properties within 300 feet 6/16/2020 7/21/2020 Site Posting 6/29/2020 7/27/2020 Nextdoor posting 6/16/2020 7/21/2020 V. STAFF ANALYSIS A. Future Land Use Map Designation(https://www.meridiancity.org/compplan) Commercial—This designation will provide a full range of commercial uses to serve area residents and visitors. Desired uses may include retail,restaurants,personal and professional services, and office uses, as well as appropriate public and quasi-public uses. Multi-family residential may be allowed in some cases,but should be careful to promote a high quality of life through thoughtful site design, connectivity, and amenities. Sample zoning include: C-N, C-C, and C-G. Medium Density Residential—This designation allows for dwelling units at gross densities of three to eight dwelling units per acre. Density bonuses may be considered with the provision of additional public amenities such as a park, school,or land dedicated for public services. When the new comprehensive plan was ratified, the subject property was given two future land use designations due to its location on a major arterial street and despite it already being zoned residential(R-8 zoning district). This parcel has both the Commercial and Medium Density Residential future land use designations. The subject site is surrounded by existing City of Meridian zoning and development to its north, west, and south. Directly to the east the City is processing a new residential subdivision. Directly across W. Overland Road(an arterial street) there is I-L zoning with two RV uses currently existing—Bish's RV and Camping World of Meridian. Directly to the west(along the northern half of the site) is the new Meridian fire station, and abutting the site on the southern half of the west boundary is a multi family residential development. Because of the addition of the Commercial future land use designation, the Applicant is proposing to rezone this property from its existing R-8 zoning to C-G,per the application. The Applicant believes utilizing this property, located on a major arterial street,for a commercial business rather than another residential subdivision. The proposed new land use is a form of RV storage and is a conditional use in the proposed C-G commercial zoning district. However, the proposed use is not a traditional RV self-storage as our code depicts;Staff must assess proposed uses with those listed in the UDC use tables for each zone. Bpke Precision Storage (the actual business name) is a more encompassing commercial business than traditional self-storage by providing a valet, "drop and go,"system that requires customers to only drop off their trailers and RVs; they will not park them nor store them themselves. Bpk Precision Storage is intended to Page 4 Page 308 Item#7. Exhibit A be a full service RV and trailer business that includes a wash before each use, supply stocking of the vehicle, and maintenance checks on standard items such as batteries, water, refrigerator, and tire pressure. In addition, a majority of the storage and business will occur within a large, single- story building. There will also be ancillary outdoor storage and vehicles and trailers will be stored on the asphalt area between the office in the back of the parcel and the main building along Overland Road, as seen on the site plan. Because this property is already zoned residential and the development to the south/southwest and to the east is residential, Staff has concerns with the request for C-G zoning. This concern lies with the potential for a higher intensity of commercial use next to said residential if this property is rezoned to C-G but never develops as proposed. Staff would prefer to see lower intensity zoning on this property that is still commercial but will help Staff ensure a more disruptive use is not principally permitted and so easily attainable if this project is not completed fully. Therefore, Staff is recommending changing the requested rezone of C-G to be C-C instead. Self-service storage(the use Staff has to place the proposed use into) is still a conditional use in the C-C zone and will not affect the future operation of this use. If the Applicant adheres to the specific use standards and any additional conditions, the proposed project should meet the Future Land Use Map (FLUM)designation definitions and preferred uses for Commercial. Below are specific comprehensive plan policies that discuss the proposed use in relation to the comp plan more thoroughly. In addition, see section V.D for further analysis on the proposed use. B. Comprehensive Plan Policies(https:llwww.meridiancitE.or /g comQplan): The applicable Comprehensive Plan policies are cited below with Staff analysis in italics. "Ensure that adequate water supply and pressure are available for fire protection in areas suitable for industrial and commercial uses."(3.03.01D). The proposed use requires additional water supply when compared to residential development due to the existence of highly flammable vehicles and additional fuel sources like that of propane and gasoline. The proposed commercial building will be sprinklered to help ensure fire safety; the appropriate water supply for this use is readily available with existing services. "Establish and maintain levels of service for public facilities and services,including water, sewer, police,transportation, schools,fire, and parks" (3.02.01 G).All public utilities are available for this project site as there is currently an existing structure on site that is being serviced by the City. This project not only lies within the Fire Department response time goal, it shared a property line with afire station. In addition, the large building should be sprinklered which adds additional safety measures in case of afire. The site currently has an existing curb cut onto W. Overland Road and Staff and ACHD have discussed this in relation to minimizing cuts onto an arterial street. Because the proposed use is commercial, it has been determined that the use and the adjacent subdivisions are better served if this site maintains its access to Overland rather than take access through a residential subdivision.If this application is not approved and the existing R-8 zoning district remains, the in process Sagewood West subdivision directly to the east is required to provide a full stub street to this property for future interconnectivity. West Ada School District and Parks did not offer comments on this application because of the proposed use. Being a commercial project, there will not be any additional children added to the schools and there will be minimal impact on existing City services. This project should, however, add to the employment base of the City. "Encourage the development of supportive commercial near employment areas."(3.06.02C).As stated above, directly to the north and across Overland Road are two RV service/sales uses. When it comes to the future location of an additional RV use that then maintains those RVs for customers, being directly across the street is readily accessible. BpiE Precision Storage is Page 5 Page 309 Item#7. Exhibit A intended to employ approximately 10 people outside of ownership and pay them more than minimum wage. This business is not an employment center itself but is minimally a supportive commercial use to those larger employers across the street because it adds an additional service for customers to partake in. "Minimize noise, lighting,and odor disturbances from commercial developments to residential dwellings by enforcing city code."(5.01.01F). City ordinances will be adhered to ensure disturbances are minimal to surrounding residential development. The Applicant is also proposing landscaping that will largely help with any potential noise and odor disturbances. In addition, a change to C-C zoning instead of the requested C-G zoning could offer an additional avenue for minimizing potential issues as less intense uses are principally permitted in the C-C zoning district when compared to C-G. "Require appropriate building design, and landscaping elements to buffer, screen,beautify, and integrate commercial,multifamily, and parking lots into existing neighborhoods."(5.01.02D). The make-up of the nearby area has been detailed above and the existence of so much residential makes integration of this use difficult.In addition, there are no existing stub streets to this parcel from adjacent subdivisions. In order to help mitigate any potential noise, light, or odor trespasses, the Applicant has proposed this use to almost wholly occur within a 29,400 square foot commercial building. The Applicant is also proposing trees and a vinyl privacy fence along the entire property boundary of the site to help with screening and to add a buffer to any adjacent use—this landscaping should also add to the beautification of the site as well. The abovementioned building does not fully comply with the architectural requirements for commercial buildings. The Applicant will be required to add additional roof variation along the northern and southern roof lines as required by the City's Architectural Standards Manual. In addition, it must be stressed that placing aprefabricated type of metal building next to residential and next to a nicely designed fire station will not be supported. Therefore, Staff is recommending additional conditions of approval that require better architecture for the proposed building to help it match and integrate with existing and proposed development. Staff finds this development to be generally consistent and in alignment with the Comprehensive Plan, if the Commission and Council support the applicant's request to rezone the property entirely commercial without a residential component as envisioned by the Comprehensive Plan. C. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There is an existing home and accessory building that currently exist on site. It is the understanding of Staff that the existing home will be removed upon development but the additional warehouse structure in the rear of the property will remain. This small warehouse will become the required office for the proposed storage use. There is also an existing access from W. Overland Road that is improved with asphalt and is to remain for the future project. D. Proposed Use Analysis: The proposed use falls under Self-Service Storage in the Unified Development Code (UDC)and is a conditional use in the proposed and recommended C-G and C-C zoning district per UDC Table 11-2B-2. Storage facilities are also governed by specific use standards as noted in UDC 1I- 4-3-34 for self-service storage facility. There is also ancillary outdoor storage proposed that is also governed by specific use standards,UDC 11-4-3-33. Commercial buildings require Certificate of Zoning Compliance(CZC)and Design Review and Staff will use these additional applications as a chance to ensure the site develops according to the conditions of approval in this staff report. Page 6 Page 310 Item#7. Exhibit A Epie Precision Storage is not a traditional RV storage facility with acres of asphalt and metal buildings that jut out of the landscape and require a security gate for customers to access the facility. By simply driving through neighborhoods one can see that the Treasure Valley is home to a large number of RVs and motorhomes and the proposed use hopes to help manage this by providing premium services for them. Epie.Precision Storage is a full service RV and trailer business that includes a wash before each use and maintenance checks on standard items such as batteries, water, refrigerator, and tire pressure. In addition,propane tanks will be filled and the vehicles will be stocked with supplies and food so that the customers only have to arrive and pick their vehicle up for a time of fun. Staff finds that the location is ideal for the proposed use due to its proximity to Bish's RV and Camping World where recreational vehicles and trailers are serviced and sold. It is well known that additional self-service storage facilities are not largely desired in the City of Meridian. Because of the details outlined above, Staff believes that the proposed use is more premier than a traditional storage facility and would in fact add a new business to the City and Valley. E. Specific Use Standards(UDC 11-4-3): The proposed self-service storage and outdoor storage uses are subject to conditional use permit approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission and subject to specific use standards outlined in UDC 11-4-3-34 and 11-4-3-33 and below,respectively: 11-4-3-34—Self-Service Storage Facility: A. Storage units and/or areas shall not be used as dwellings or as a commercial or industrial place of business. The manufacture or sale of any item by a tenant from or at a self- service storage facility is specifically prohibited.As noted, the proposed use does not fully fit within uses listed in the UDC use table. Self-service storage is the closest use to the proposed use but does not fit with this requirement as the use is a commercial use where the main building will be used to both store and maintain customer's RVs and trailers. No items will be manufactured on the subject site or within any proposed buildings. B. On site auctions of unclaimed items by the storage facility owners shall be allowed as a temporary use in accord with chapter 3, article E, "Temporary Use Requirements",of this title. C. The distance between structures shall be a minimum of twenty five feet(25'). The proposed site plan shows compliance with this standard. D. The storage facility shall be completely fenced,walled, or enclosed and screened from public view. Where abutting a residential district or public road, chain-link shall not be allowed as fencing material.A majority of the storage and use is proposed to occur within the large commercial building.Ancillary outdoor storage is likely to occur and the Applicant is proposing to screen this with a privacy vinyl fence and a 25 foot wide landscape buffer abutting the residential uses. E. If abutting a residential district,the facility hours of public operation shall be limited to six o'clock(6:00)A.M. to eleven o'clock(11:00)P.M.According to the application, the Applicant's proposed hours of business are 7:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. and are therefore within the allowable range of business operation hours. F. A minimum twenty five foot(25')wide landscape buffer shall be provided where the facility abuts a residential use,unless a greater buffer width is otherwise required by this title. Landscaping shall be provided as set forth in subsection 11-3B-9C of this title. The submitted landscape plans show a 25 foot buffer but it does appear to meet UDC 11-3B- Page 7 Page 311 Item#7. Exhibit A 5N requirements that any type of buffer be at least 70%covered with vegetation at maturity. Staff is recommending a condition of approval to correct this. G. If the use is unattended,the standards in accord with section 11-3A-16, "Self-Service Uses",of this title shall also apply.Not applicable; use is attended. H. The facility shall have a second means of access for emergency purposes. The submitted plans show a secondary access in the northeast corner of the site in line with a requirement of the Sagewood West subdivision to the east currently in process with the City. This access satisfies this standard. I. All outdoor storage of material shall be maintained in an orderly manner so as not to create a public nuisance.Materials shall not be stored within the required yards. Stored items shall not block sidewalks or parking areas and may not impede vehicular or pedestrian traffic. Submitted plans show compliance with this standard. J. The site shall not be used as a'vehicle wrecking or junk yard" as herein defined. The Applicant shall comply with this standard. K. For any use requiring the storage of fuel or hazardous material,the use shall be located a minimum of one thousand feet(1,000)from a hospital. (Ord. 13-1555, 5-14-2013) Liquid propane may be stored on site for use in filling propane tanks in customer vehicles. There is no hospital within 1,000 feet of the subject site; therefore, this standard shall be satisfied. 11-4-3-33—Outdoor Storage Facility: A. All outdoor storage of material shall be maintained in an orderly manner so as not to create a public nuisance. The Applicant shall comply with this standard. B. Stored items shall not block sidewalks or parking areas and may not impede vehicular or pedestrian traffic. The Applicant shall comply with this standard. C. The site shall not be used as a"vehicle wrecking or junk yard" as herein defined. The Applicant shall comply with this standard. D. For any use requiring the storage of fuel or hazardous material,the use shall be located a minimum of one thousand feet(1,000) from a hospital.See comment on same standard above. E. For properties in industrial districts,the following standards shall apply: (The subject site is not proposed with an industrial district and therefore this standard does not apply) a. For properties that are adjacent to nonindustrial properties and/or public streets, outdoor storage of materials, equipment, inventory, and/or supplies shall be incorporated into the overall design of buildings and site landscaping so that the visual impacts of these functions are fully contained and screened from view of adjacent nonindustrial properties and/or public streets by a solid fence and/or wall with a minimum height of six feet(6). Such fence and/or wall shall be constructed of complementary or of similar design and materials of the primary structure. b. For properties that adjoin the railway corridor, in addition to the standards of subsection E1 of this section, outdoor storage of materials, equipment, inventory, and/or supplies shall be screened from the edge of the required street buffer a Page 8 Page 312 Item#7. Exhibit A distance of one hundred feet(100) from the edge of right of way parallel to the railway corridor. c. For properties where subsections E1 and/or E2 of this section do not apply, outdoor storage areas do not need to be screened. (Ord. 09-1420, 6-23-2009, eff. 6-23-2009) F. Dimensional Standards(UDC 11-2): The proposed commercial building appears to meet all UDC dimensional standards including required landscape buffers,building setbacks, drive aisle widths, and building height. G. Access(UDC 11-3A-3, 11-3H-4): Access is proposed via the existing curb cut from W. Overland Road, an arterial street. ACHD approves of this access point as the proposed use is a commercial use and vehicle trips to the location is presumed to be minimal when compared to a residential development. The specific use standards require a secondary access for storage facilities and the Applicant is proposing one at the eastern boundary that lines up with a proposed common driveway in the adjacent Sagewood West development currently being processed. This Applicant and the Applicant for Sagewood West have worked together to align this emergency only access. Typically, an emergency access must meet a separation requirement from the main access in order to count as a secondary access for Meridian Fire. However, the requirement of this secondary access is not a Fire requirement but a Planning one and therefore the normally required separation between the two access points is not applicable. H. Parking(UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided at one space per 500 square feet in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-6B for commercial zoning districts. Specifically for self-service storage facilities,this requirement is only applicable based on the gross floor area of the office space.According to the submitted site plan, the existing warehouse building on site is 3,185 square feet, requiring a minimum of seven (7)parking spaces. The Applicant has proposed seven (7)parking spaces, of which two (2)are ADA accessible. Because the proposed use uses a valet system, Staff finds the proposed parking to be sufficient. Between the office and the main building, the Applicant is proposing to install asphalt paving for the majority of that area. This area is intended for outdoor storage and staging of RVs and trailers but will not be for public parking. This area will likely not be striped as the position and size of items parked in this area will vary throughout business operation. The outdoor storage specific use standards shall be adhered to because of this proposed ancillary use. L Pathways (UDC 11-3A-8): No pathways are proposed or required due to frontage along W. Overland Road being fully improved with curb, gutter,and sidewalk. J. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-17): The subject site has its only street frontage on W. Overland Road and this section of Overland has been fully improved with 5 lanes and curb,gutter, and attached sidewalk. The Applicant is proposing a short extension of the sidewalk to go into the site. This extension turns into a pedestrian crosswalk that leads to the front door of the main storage building. UDC 11-3A-19, "Site Design Standards,"also dictates that sidewalks be provided from the public street to the office for a delineated path for pedestrians. No submitted plans show this Page 9 Page 313 Item#7. Exhibit A sidewalk connection to the office in the back of the site where parking is proposed. In order to satisfy this requirement this additional sidewalk should be delineated through the parking lot in some way. For example, stamped concrete, brick, or similar. Staff is recommending a condition of approval to correct this. K. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): A 25-foot wide street buffer is required adjacent to W. Overland Road, an arterial street, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. A 25-foot wide buffer is shown on the submitted site plan and landscape plan. In addition,a 25-foot buffer is required between the proposed commercial use and any residential uses,landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-9.A 25-foot landscape buffer is depicted on the submitted landscape plans along the property boundary that abuts all residential uses, existing and proposed. When a landscape buffer between uses is required, the requirement is meant to ensure adequate screening between dissimilar uses. The code requires that this buffer include trees that have canopies that touch at maturity. The Applicant is proposing to use a large number existing trees for this buffer that are not on this property but are near the property line and on the adjacent property to the east. Therefore, the Applicant shall be required to revise the submitted landscape plans and show adequate landscape material within the required buffer per UDC 11-3B-9 standards. With the combination of a privacy fence and dense landscaping, Stafffinds the proposed landscape buffers as sufficient to meet this code requirement. The City Arborist has made Staff aware of a potential issue with the Fraxinus `Ash"tree species. This type of tree species attract a specific and invasive pest and it is the request of the City Arborist that projects start trying to replace these types of trees with other tree species. Therefore, Staff is recommending a condition of approval that the Applicant work with the City Arborist on an appropriate alternative to their proposed "Ash"tree selection. L. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. Fencing is proposed as shown on the landscape plan along the entire property boundary and meets UDC standards as proposed. M. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): The Applicant submitted conceptual renderings and conceptual elevations of the new proposed storage/commercial building(see Section VII.E). The submitted plans do not meet all of the standards as required for commercial development in the Architectural Standards Manual(ASM). This application does not include Design Review but staff is recommending certain conditions to ensure any future commercial building on this site is built to a premier standard as intended by the ASM. Specifically,prefabricated metal siding is prohibited as afield material unless uses with a minimum of two other qualifying field materials and meets all other standard fenestration and material requirements (ASM, Commercial District Goal 5.20). The submitted elevations show this type of metal as afield material along the top of the entire building. The only other field material proposed appears to be stucco;all other materials are used as accents. Staff understands that the proposed building is a large metal building but that does not mean that an industrial type building can be dropped on a lot within a commercial district. IF the metal look is desired, it should be of high quality like that of"high grade fiber panels,"for example. In addition, Staff recommends replacing some of the metal shown on the plans with windows to create a more interesting fagade across the different building elevations.Adding overhangs or architectural Page 10 Page 314 Item#7. Exhibit A trellis along the building(especially on the north fagade that faces the public street) would also add interest and qualifying fenestration to the building. The submitted plans also do not show where mechanical equipment will be placed. The proposed building will be climate controlled so the required HVAC system will not be small. Where will this be located? The plans do not show any parapet on the building and any roof mounted mechanical equipment must be fully screened from public view. To help fix this and add the required roofline variation, Staff recommends adding an architectural parapet around the building that helps anchor the top of the structure architecturally and provide screening opportunities for future mechanical equipment. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the requested rezone and conditional use permit per the Findings in Section IX of this staff report and if the Commission and Council deem the site more appropriate to develop entirely with a commercial use as proposed B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on July 9,2020.At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject Conditional Use Permit and Rezone requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Glenn Walker,project architect b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Glenn Walker,Architect d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Joseph Dodson f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission. a. Height offence adjacent to residential uses; b. Use of existingfy in rear of property that is to remain; c. How proposed use actually functions on-site with intended"valet"service model. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Add condition/DA provision that an 8-foot tall fence be constructed along the property lines that abut a residential use. 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. Applicant has not addressed conditions 1.1 and 1.2. Staff recommends that Council modify these conditions to include a rewording that requires the Applicant to supply these revised documents to PlanningStaff to any Rezone ordinance approval. C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on August 11,2020. At the public hearing the Council moved to approve the subject Rezone and Conditional Use Permit requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearine: a. In favor: Glenn Walker,ADP Architects(Applicant Rep.) b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Glenn Walker d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Joseph Dodson,Current Associate Planner f Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: Page 11 Page 315 Item#7. Exhibit A a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Architectural design of the Proposed building and location of outdoor storage. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. Modify conditions 1.1 and 1.2 to include language that they are completed prior to the Rezone ordinance being approved by City Council. Page 12 Page 316 Item#7. Exhibit A VII. EXHIBITS A. Rezone Legal Description and Exhibit Map N May 13,2020 Rezoning to Zone CG Legal Description BASIS OF BEARING for this description is S89"33'34"E between a found 1/2"Iran Pin at the West 1/16°i Corner and the Northwest corner of Section 24,Township 3 North,Range 1 West,B.M.,Ada County, Idaho. THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24,TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,RANGE 1 WEST, B-M.,ADA COUNTY,IDAHO AS DESCRIBED- BEGINNING AT POINT IN THE NO RTHW EST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24,SAID POINT BEING 589°33'34"E 545.35 FEET ALONGTHE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER AND SOO°15'00"W 51.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWESTQUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 24,TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,RANGE 1 WEST,B.M. AND RUNNING S89°33'34"E 255.06 FEET;THENCE S00°34'17"E 167.30 FEET;THENCE 501°48'54"E 147.24 FEET;THENCE 501°58'59"E 178.09 FEET;THENCE 502°25'10"E 396.57 FEET;THENCE N66"01'50"W 134.39 FEET;THENCE N65°22'50"W 88.17 FEET;THENCE N00°00'00E 454.47 FEET; THENCE N90°00'00"W 82.84 FEET;THENCE N00-15'00"E 344.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 4.23 ACRES IN AREA www.edmpartners.corn • 2815 East 330D South,Salt Lake City,UT 84109 • 801-305-4670 Page 13 Page 317 Item#7. Exhibit A NORTHWEST QUARTER CORNER SECTION 24,TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST,B.M. 1/16TH CORNER (BASIS OF BEARING) (CENTERLINE OVERLAND ROAD) CPELF NO. 9016820 _ _ 589'33'34"E 1327.74' _ 545.35' 255.06' 589°33'34"E 50 15'00'W so-15'00"W 51.00' 51.00' 255.06' P.O.B. w O M � � M O W 8 W In O ^� Z j a � V p� N Vi A � rtl N N90'00'00' 82.84' o cn u u A w 8 Q v v o c z Ay OG N ttdd W e V O_ C O fn N % H65 Z�5o 88 Y p lr N66 w �3 00,w ?39' A W h aPrecision Storage g � e '' Legal Description � SCALE:1"=150' m DATE: FIGURE: " 0 75 150 300 May 15,2020 2 Page 14 Page 318 Item#7. Exhibit A B. Site Plan(dated: June 2020) r z ---- -- — -- ---�-- �;ii IF P K C 5 � k y STORAGE PACILCPY FOR: ADP ARCHITECTS s D 4 ELIC DEVELOPMENT ] 45 W.OVLIZLAND RD. y p MRRIDIAN,I DAI 1033642 NL W S1TL PLAN Page 15 Page 319 Item#7. Exhibit A C. Landscape Rendering(date: June 2020) LIJ r F Z I �oa❑r�v�a�noM � — z a W 1 j j it•. I j f Is I ow �o a O I r �h I s Page 16 Page 320 Exhibit A D. Landscape Plans(date: June 2020) 0 A E ;F 1V I- ia F 5 C) coo Z C) G o o 0 0 0 V C, 0 0 C, z 000 , KD Aj 5z61:1� OVERLANDSTORAGE 0 Page 17 Item#7. Exhibit A exu-lecwi,Tllotl oallwasorxPLK LJ TtrP44w PNI al ors a'�ILYdI1C/6 Y46Y:b/0,111C11� QI } I f{' TPa1 TL war,r ritiWOTIYOAiOW1r �� "SO• n lRmn-lr�tiew I wrs+u. w - MPLAOI NoACIPd1lLP ep 10PlPopphNm w TBTOIL-Hu4MTlhTr � T81O,1t AT _.I w.Tlwrtr rsc� PD10 re.ra anyl.a PMiAi wrar ir,wa� I O1� I ala 'I Mui asI�GWIfu duals - SIZP[\rTiRM--Ala11 v.1jo .Y _ 3' 11Qi��1� T{}TQL illTOTOuC a"twOiKf J4 IInT mATIhTr fD 7 Y! Y011lh rile l'�'D Page 18 Page 322 ® Exhibit . BuildingE. Conceptual ONE _ a Y Page. •- Item#7. Exhibit A OF 41 t Page 20 Page 324 Item#7. Exhibit A � x err Page 21 Page 325 Item#7. Exhibit A 4 y4 � i A H f [17 < Ix � T 1�"a: - 11 iyr a-•:r,' — VU i ? YI 4�'lft F NEW STORAGE FAMI3Y FOR: ADP ARCHITECTS s EPIC DEVELOPMENT AAC'NIT VRE 4 RRAL as TA rS PLANNING nS 1345 W.OVERLAND RD. c sx pAP.Ics�a, AIA y 1591 X YILl H04➢9T, WPRS.M!-d18-0191 MERIDIAN,IDAfiO 83642 B➢1SS.I➢AXO B9f13 9sutia.�rtpww.ovm � I ELEVATIONS Page 22 Page 326 Item#7. Exhibit A VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. As allowed by Idaho State Law with Annexation and Rezone applications,a Development Agreement(DA)is required as a provision of rezoning this property. Prior to approval of the rezone ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s)at the time of rezone ordinance adoption,and the developer. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the rezone. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: At least for ( 0) days prior-to the City C,.,,neil�,o.,,;,,,.prior to the Rezone Ordinance approval by City Council,the Applicant shall submit: 1. Revised legal descriptions for the requested rezone to reflect the C-C zoning district instead of the C-G zoning district AND 2. Revised legal description for the rezone boundary to reflect the conveyance of the sliver of land from the proposed Sagewood West application,Lot 27,Block 1 of their proposed plat. a. Future development shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the C-C zoning district and those listed in the specific use standards for self-service storage facilities and ancillary outdoor storage,UDC 11-4-3-34 and UDC 11-4-3-33,respectively. b. The only approved direct lot access to W. Overland Road is that existing access in the northeast corner of the subject site. c. The Applicant shall maintain an emergency only access to the east via the proposed common drive in the adjacent subdivision to the east, Sagewood West. d. The Applicant shall comply with the ordinances in effect at the time of application submittal. e. Prior to CZC and DES submittal,the Applicant shall obtain approval of a Property Boundary Adjustment to consolidate all existing lots(S1224223270 & S1224223300) into one and include the sliver of land conveyed from the property owner to the east, shown as Lot 27,Block 1 in the Sagewood West preliminary plat. £ All fencing adjacent to abutting residential uses shall be privacy fencingand nd eight(8)feet in height meeting UDC 11-3A-7 standards. Page 23 Page 327 Item#7. Exhibit A 2. The Applicant shall obtain Certificate of Zoning Compliance(CZC)and Administrative Design Review(DES) approval prior to submitting for building permits. 3. The submitted site plan, dated June 2020 and as seen in Exhibit VII.B, shall be revised to show the required sidewalk from W. Overland Road to the office in the rear of the subject site. The sidewalk shall be delineated by being constructed of a different material than the asphalt parking lot(i.e. stamped concrete,brick, or similar). 4. The submitted landscape plan, dated June 2020 and as seen in Exhibit VII.D, shall be revised as follows: a. Show the required landscape buffer to all residential land uses as at least 70%covered by vegetation at maturity, as set forth in UDC 11-3B-5N. b. Add the required additional sidewalk from W. Overland to the office in the rear of the subject site. The sidewalk shall be delineated by being constructed of a different material than the asphalt parking lot(i.e. stamped concrete,brick, or similar). windows,5. Prior-to the Planning a-ad Zoning Commission hea ing on ittly 9, 2020,the eleveAieas an elevation r-endei4ngs, da4ed 2,L25/2020 a-ad seen in E)4iibit VILE, shall be revised prior-to GZG and DES submittal as follows: a. Add an additional field material that is p:2t pr-e fabr-ieated metal siding along all biAding b. Add , e. Add ^,-ehito^,,wa tr-ells oft the nei4h, east, Ra west building f eades; ; e. Gofftifme the stone 3veneer-effte the proposed-pop outs and M a higher-heigh4 ffam th-e fl. Add a parapet along the r-eefliae with the required medtilatien that will also eever-an Page 24 Page 328 Item#7. Exhibit A 6. All future lighting on the subject site shall be compatible to abutting residential uses and adhere to the standards outlined in UDC 11-3A-11C,these standards are to be met regardless of the lumen output. 7. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for commercial developments based on the gross floor area of the self-service storage office. 8. The Applicant shall work with the City Arborist on an appropriate alternative to their proposed"Ash"tree selection and obtain approval from the City Arborist prior to building permit approval. 9. The conditional use approval shall become null and void unless otherwise approved by the City if the applicant fails to: 1)commence the use, satisfy the requirements, acquire building permits and commence construction within two years as set forth in UDC 11-513-6F1; or 2) obtain approval of a time extension as set forth in UDC 11-5B-6F4. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 A street light plan will need to be included in the final plat and or building permit application. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the City's Design Standards. Contact the Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator for additional information. 1.2 The existing water main stub into the property is a 10",not a 6" as shown on the plan 1.3 Retain and protect the existing fire hydrant at the end of the 10" main 1.4 Provide a utility easement from the end of the existing 10" line to the west property line matching up with the existing utility easement in Linder Road Apartments 1.5 The water service and fire line should connect to the existing 10" line,not the existing 12" line in Overland Rd as currently shown 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall be dedicated via using the City of Meridian's standard forms. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2"x 11"map with bearings and distances(marked EXHIBIT B)for review. Both exhibits must Page 25 Page 329 Item#7. Exhibit A be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year- round source of water(MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B.Whitney at(208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 2.9 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.10 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.11 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.12 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.13 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.14 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.15 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.16 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.17 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting.A Page 26 Page 330 Item#7. Exhibit A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. 2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond.Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT https:llweblink.meridiancily.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=184359&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianC iv D. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) https:llweblink.meridiancily.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=190570&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianC E. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT https:llweblink.meridiancily.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=184914&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianC hty F. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https:llweblink.meridiancily.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=191804&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianC iv IX. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application.In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment to C-C zoning district and not the requested C-G zoning district is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, if all provisions of the Development Agreement and conditions of approval are complied with. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment and request for Recreational Vehicle storage to be generally consistent with the purpose statement of the commercial district and future land use designation of Commercial. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; Page 27 Page 331 Item#7. Exhibit A Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare if all provisions of the Development Agreement and conditions of approval are complied with. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment will not result in an adverse impact on the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The subject property is already annexed; therefore Staff finds that this finding is not applicable. However, Council finds that the requested rezone and addition of a commercial use is in the best interest of the city. B. Conditional Use Permit The Commission shall base its determination on the conditional use permit request upon the following: 1. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located. The site and proposed building meets all the dimensional and development regulations in the commercial zoning districts for the proposed use. Therefore, Council finds the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use. 2. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian comprehensive plan and in accord with the requirements of this title. Council finds the proposed self-service storage facility will be harmonious with the Comprehensive Plan in that it is a conditional use in the C-C and C-G zoning districts which are allowable zones in the Commercial future land use designation as noted in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 3. That the design, construction,operation and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area. Council finds the operation of the proposed self-service storage facility should be compatible with the other uses in the area and will not adversely change the essential character of this area if all conditions of approval and DA provisions are met. 4. That the proposed use,if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed,will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. If the proposed facility complies with the conditions of approval in Section VIII as required, Council finds the proposed use should not adversely affect other properties in the vicinity. 5. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets,schools,parks,police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal,water,and sewer. The subject site is already annexed into the City and these services are already being provided to the existing buildings on site. Therefore, Council finds the proposed use will be served adequately by all public facilities and services. Page 28 Page 332 Item#7. Exhibit A 6. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Council finds the proposed use should not create any additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. 7. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes,materials,equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons,property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic,noise,smoke,fumes,glare or odors. With adequate screening and adherence to applicable zoning and building code requirements, Council finds the proposed use should not be detrimental to any persons,property, or the general welfare. 8. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction,loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance.(Ord. 05-1170,8-30- 2005,eff.9-15-2005) Council is not aware of any such features; the proposed use should not result in damage of any such features. Page 29 Page 333 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Poiema Subdivision (H-2020- 0035) by Dave Evans Construction, Located at 3727 E. Lake Hazel Rd. Page 334 Item#8. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI N:- , AND DECISION&ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Annexation and Preliminary Plat for Poiema Subdivision,by Dave Evans Construction. Case No(s). H-2020-0035 For the City Council Hearing Date of: August 11,2020 (Findings on August 25, 2020) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11,2020, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11, 2020, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11, 2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11, 2020, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11,2020,incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Poiema Subdivision—FILE#H-2020-0035) - I - Page 335 Item#8. reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Annexation and Preliminary Plat is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11,2020,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I- 6B-7C). Notice of Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit,when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time,the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting,the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two(2)year period. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-513-6.G.1,the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one(1)two (2)year period.Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Poiema Subdivision—FILE#H-2020-0035) -2- Page 336 Item#8. City Code Title I I(UDC 11-513-617). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28)days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521,any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52,Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of August 11,2020 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Poiema Subdivision—FILE#H-2020-0035) -3- Page 337 Item#8. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 25th day of August 2020. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E.Simison Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 8-25-2020 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Poiema Subdivision—FILE#H-2020-0035) -4- Page 338 Item#8. Exhibit A STAFF REPORT C: E IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 8/11/2020 Legend DATE: Project Location TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Joe Dodson,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: H-2020-0035 Poiema Subdivision ' LOCATION: The site is located at 3727 E. Lake Hazel ` Road, in the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of e Section 4,Township 2N.,Range 1E. ------- 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Annexation&zoning of 14.87 acres of land with an R-15 zoning district and preliminary plat consisting of 48 building lots and 6 common lots,by Dave Evans Construction. Note:Staff received updated plans late into the review process. These plans have been analyzed to the best of Staffs ability given the timeline but finds them to be in better compliance than those originally submitted Much of the analysis within this report is based on the new plans and the exhibits within this staff report have been updated to reflect this. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 14.87 acres Future Land Use Designation Medium-High Density Residential Existing Land Use(s) Vacant Proposed Land Use(s) Residential and future Religious Institution(Church) Lots(#and type;bldg./common) 48 total lots—43 single-family residential; 1 lot for future Church building site;and 4 common lots. Phasing Plan(#of phases) Proposed as one(1)phase. Number of Residential Units(type 48 total units-33 single-family attached units;and 15 of units) single-family townhome units. Density(gross&net) Gross— 7.5 du/ac.;Net— 10.75 du/ac. Open Space(acres,total 1.08 acres total,0.75 qualifying open space(or approx.. [%]/buffer/qualified) 11.7%qualified) Amenities 1 amenity—Water feature with seating Page 1 Page 339 Item#8. Exhibit A Description Details Page Physical Features(waterways, Ten Mile Creek runs along the western boundary but is not hazards,flood plain,hillside) on the subject site.Part of the site resides within the 100- year floodplain zone. Neighborhood meeting date;#of December 16,2019—3 attendees attendees: History(previous approvals) N/A B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Draft Report Section VIII.H • Requires ACHD Commission No Action(yes/no) Access(Arterial/Collectors/State Proposed access is off of E.Lake Hazel Road,an arterial. Hwy/Local)(Existing and Proposed) The proposed access is via a new public local street. ACHD is allowing a modification to their district policies to allow this access as there is no other lesser classified street available. Stub Street/Interconnectivity/Cross A new stub street is proposed to the adjacent property to Access the west from the proposed local street noted above. This access is approved by ACHD as noted in their staff report. Existing Road Network E.Lake Hazel,an arterial,is existing with 2 travel lanes. Existing Arterial Sidewalks/ No Buffers Proposed Road Improvements Applicant is not proposing to improve E.Lake Hazel as it is scheduled to be widened to 5 travel lanes by ACHD in 2024. Fire Servic • Distance to Fire Station 3 miles from Fire Station#4 • Fire Response Time Part of the proposed development falls within the 5 minute response time goal. • Resource Reliability 78%(below the target rating of 80%) • Risk Identification Risk Factor 2—Residential with hazards;current resources would not be adequate to supply service to this project due to nearby waterway if an emergency were to occur. • Accessibility Proposed project meets all required access,road widths, and turnarounds. The project will be limited to 30 homes until the entire emergency access along the western boundary is constructed. Police Service • Distance to Police Station 5.5 miles • Response Time Goal of 3-5 minutes • Accessibility MPD has no concerns with access into this development; the MPD can service this development if approved. • Additional Comments There is no call data in this area because the proposed development is at the edge of City Limits. Between March 2019 and March 2020,MPD responded to 7 calls for service within one mile of this proposed development. The crime count on those calls was one(1). Page 2 Page 340 Item#8. Exhibit A Description Details Page Between March 2019 and March 2020,MPD responded to 9 crashes within 1 miles of this proposed development. West Ada School District • Distance(elem,ms,hs) No comments submitted at this time. • Capacity of Schools • #of Students Enrolled Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Services N/A • Sewer Shed South Black Cat Trunk Shed • Estimated Project Sewer See application ERU's • WRRF Declining Balance 13.92 • Project Consistent with WW YES Master Plan/Facility Plan • Additional Comments Flows have been committed No sewer mains in common driveways Applicant to provide"to and through"to property to the west. Water • Distance to Water Services 710 feet • Pressure Zone 5 • Estimated Project Water See application ERU's • Water Quality Concerns None • Project Consistent with Water YES Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns The water main extension in Lake Hazel is currently shown in the wrong corridor,the water main should remain north of center line instead of being moved south of center line.Also,the water main in Lake Hazel needs to be a 12", not an 8"as currently shown.We prefer to have a main stub or service line(whichever is needed)to the future church lot to eliminate cutting the new road in the future. Page 3 Page 341 1 1 1 x .. ■a \-='=-III N at��C'vmu► �U x ''••: nnndlla _ r n1 1 — ...,Ilii � nn - -, - a • - r alal - nnmr � �nnm•� Donn - e - o __ . ��\�\�/IIR\► mnn�-nnnm Ilnnun\►nnG _ i ,1 �1111� W;.I nu nunnn I •��_��_�� W 1 m -noon Illl'11 111�� Ji=---- Innn FlI11�@llil��,yu J i � �n71 un nn � C7�nnnllln �nnuw_ t7 ., ��:=� Q 1,1 1111111111? � �- u 1 • � 1r4 � .` ■LAKE-HAZEL Wl �� °-j ;LUX =HAZEL- -7 . I I a L~_ I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 lin►�mnnnn� - • - • _mnnnl a nun f - • - • Jon_uln ■ _ �1111 NI� __ � 1111 NIA --:: \-5:-- II7 • -:1 -��-- III on x xl Ire=1:.. unll �Il x 11:-_a_unn 1 nm -_J nnndP m�T II•- �I -,,1 Ilillll I 1 � ' -�: - • -• '• �:-1� -III >• 111 -��= - �� 1111111 7 L 11111 9-rlrrllla rIr11171: -- p e 7 11111 9-rlrrllla rIr11171: -- mnun: _anon a:'loom ninTil- - - R�r ��i =mom a:'loom ninTil- -.� �11111= _Illllllr r11111111/11111111=�=�_' •-�• 11111111�:Irrlllaa a11111111- ... - Irllrll glllll -11111111 rrr11111 111111111- \�\ Ial��■L m nu--nmm�l nnmw\Gml C' d�71\� 1�i�1 umNow 'fam mr F nnnm nnnun►�lt�1a.^:' 1■�111111 W.m nll nuumn I :aaaaall�,1�' �111111 : nul IIIIIIITW;m all numm mnllnl.l i m -noon --_ m -noon uuluu will • �� y�Illlnlll �Imlllll_ ii -IM lI ey �r...-..-.._.._,r-.:_-•-r= �,/ 111111111 IIIIIINI;� � �� . � 1,•' 1111111111� � a 1+Fr in��r��ir1� f f :W_�i�� ',�4y 1111111111.� � nllllllllll a '• L - ,r- -a ;I..n..l mll1711 1l11 11 jllllllllll LAKE�HAZEL l rIOIIIIIId= "`'u�rLAKE=HAZEL-' IN Y NINE I _1111 III 1111111 SIr - � �IIIIIIn S J c I 111111111111� . ��r11Y�1111�LIIIIIa1a1:r� i Item#s. Exhibit A IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper Notification 5/29/2020 7/24/2020 Radius notification mailed to properties within 300 feet 5/26/2020 7/21/2020 Site Posting 6/8/2020 7/31/2020 Nextdoor posting 5/27/2020 7/21/2020 V. STAFF ANALYSIS A. Future Land Use Map Designation(https:llwww.meridiancitE.or /g compplan) Medium-High Density Residential—This designation allows for a mix of dwelling types including townhouses, condominiums, and apartments. Residential gross densities should range from eight to twelve dwelling units per acre. These areas are relatively compact within the context of larger neighborhoods and are typically located around or near mixed use commercial or employment areas to provide convenient access to services and jobs for residents. Developments need to incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place and should also incorporate connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways, attractive landscaping and a project identity. The proposed annexation area lies at the edge of the City's area of impact on the south side of E. Lake Hazel road, approximately % mile east of Eagle Road. There is existing City of Meridian zoning directly across Lake Hazel to the north but no other existing Meridian zoning is adjacent to the subject site. There is a golf course directly to the east of this property, within the City of Boise. Despite minimal existing zoning directly to the west and southwest of this site, the City is currently processing multiple projects in this area, as seen in the Planned Development Map above. This project, if approved, should blend in well with these adjacent developments. The proposed land use of attached single-family residential and townhome units (per the revised site plan) is consistent with the Future Land Use Map (FL UM)designation definitions for Medium High Density Residential(MHDR). MHDR requires a density of 8-12 units per acre. The Applicant has proposed a project with 7.5 du/ac with their updated plat and the comprehensive plan allows for rounding of density. Because of the proposed product type and the difficult shape of the property to begin with, Staff supports rounding the proposed density of 7.5 du/ac to the required 8 du/ac per the provisions in the comprehensive plan. In addition to the proposed residential use on this site, the Applicant is reserving a building lot for a future church site; a church is a conditional use within the proposed R-I S zoning district. The residential portion of the site consists of approximately 7.5 acres (including the right of way) and the future church lot is approximately 7 acres. This application does not include the conditional use permit application for the church lot; that use will be analyzed with the future conditional use permit submittal. The City may require a development agreement(DA) in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A.In order to ensure the site develops as proposed with this application, Staff recommends a DA as a provision of annexation with the provisions included in Section HII.A1. The DA is required to be signed by the property owners)/developer and returned to the City within 6 months of the Council granting the annexation for approval by City Council and subsequent recordation. Page 5 Page 343 Item#8. Exhibit A B. Comprehensive Plan Policies(https://www.meridianciL.orglcompplan): The applicable Comprehensive Plan policies are cited below with Staff analysis in italics. "Avoid the concentration of any one housing type or lot size in any geographical area;provide for diverse housing types throughout the City"(2.01.01 G). The proposed R-1 S zoning and proposed land use of single family attached and townhome residential is an extension of some of the housing products recently approved nearby and some of the housing proposed on the adjacent site to the west. R-1 S zoning and attached single-family homes are not abundant in the immediate area at this time but if this project and the adjacent project to the west are approved, this type of housing would make up a fair portion of the housing options in this Y2 mile area.A vast majority of the housing within a mile of this site is detached single-family residential. So, adding 48 units of a different product type to the area helps meet this comprehensive plan policy. "With new subdivision plats,require the design and construction of pathways connections, easy pedestrian and bicycle access to parks, safe routes to schools, and the incorporation of usable open space with quality amenities"(2.02.01A). The Ten Mile Creek runs adjacent to this property on its western boundary but is not on the subject site. Because of this, there is no multi-use pathway proposed on this property. However, the project that Staff is also processing for the adjacent property to the west is constructing that multi-use pathway. Because of the proposed internal stub street with attached sidewalks with this development, there should be adequate pedestrian connection to the multi-use pathway on the adjacent parcel. With a connection to the pathway, residents within this development will have greater pedestrian and bicyclist connection to the north to Hillsdale Park and the Hillsdale YMCA. The largest area of open space proposed with this development is expected to be shared between the residences and the future church site. That common open space lot is proposed to be approximately 15,000 square feet in size and offer a relatively large open area for residents and churchgoers to use. Because the lot is relatively large and open, it is more usable than open space that may be qualifying but is usually dispersed throughout the development. Staff supports open space that is in this more usable format. The other open space in this development abuts the Ten Mile Creek and the proposed townhomes; this area should offer additional visual amenity to the development and those townhomes specifically. In addition, this open space area near the creek and the cul-de-sac will contain a water feature and seating area for the residents. Again, offering usable open space and an amenity for the proposed community. For the size of this site, Staff ,finds the proposed open space is adequate in size. "Reduce the number of existing access points onto arterial streets by using methods such as cross- access agreements,access management, and frontage/backage roads, and promoting local and collector street connectivity"(6.01.02B).Due to the odd shape of this parcel, strict adherence to ACHD and City policies regarding access points to arterial streets was not feasible. The Applicant has proposed the main access into this development as far east on their parcel as possible. Because of this,ACHD has agreed to modify their policy to allow for this additional access onto E. Lake Hazel. This Applicant is also proposing a stub street to the west for future local street connectivity which sets up future development to the west and south to minimize their potential accesses onto arterial in the area. "Annex lands into the corporate boundaries of the City only when the annexation proposal conforms to the City's vision and the necessary extension of public services and infrastructure is provided." (3.03.03). The proposed development and uses adhere to the vision established by the underlying future land use designation.Attached single-family and townhomes are permitted uses and a Church is a conditional use in the R-1 S zoning district. In addition, all infrastructure extensions will be paid for by the Applicant and not the taxpayers. Page 6 Page 344 Item#8. Exhibit A "Encourage compatible uses and site design to minimize conflicts and maximize use of land." (3.07.00). The proposed single-family residential development is compatible with other residential and agricultural uses in the area; the future Church development should be compatible with nearby uses as well. In addition, additional residential units built at this density should be compatible with the existing golf course use on the parcel directly to the east. Staff finds this development to be generally consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies and objectives. C. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There are no existing structures on the subject site and no site improvements are known at this time. D. Proposed Use Analysis: The proposed use is attached single-family residential and townhome single-family residential; both types of residential dwellings are listed as principally permitted uses in the R-15 zoning district per UDC Table 11-2A-2. Part of the property(along the western boundary)lies within the 100-year floodplain boundary. The Applicant is currently awaiting the results of a floodplain study to determine the types of constraints and/or possibilities of reducing this boundary area. See Public Works comments for further requirements of the site. E. Dimensional Standards(UDC 11-2): The proposed lots along the eastern boundary and the public streets appear to meet all UDC dimensional standards per the submitted preliminary plat. This includes property sizes,required street frontages, and road widths. The revised preliminary plat submitted by the Applicant shows townhomes off of a private alley. It is the understanding of Staff that ACHD has not yet given comments on the precise location of this alley but are generally supportive of it. Per the revised plat, all lots appear to meet UDC dimensional standards for the R-15 zoning district and attached single-family unit type. hi addition,all subdivision developments are also required to comply with Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards (UDC 11-6C-3). There is one(1) common driveway proposed and such driveways should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. If any common drives are proposed,an exhibit should be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks,fencing,building envelope,and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via the common driveway; if a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street,the driveway should be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway. F. Access(UDC 11-3A-3): Access is proposed via a new local street into this development from E. Lake Hazel Road. The Applicant is also proposing a stub street to the west for future local street connectivity.For these areas, all dimensional standards appear to meet UDC requirements. Because the stub street to the west will likely lead to nowhere at the time of this development, the Applicant will have to provide an emergency only access. The Applicant is showing on their master plan (as shown in Exhibit VII.B) a 20 foot wide emergency only access from the stub street that runs along the western property boundary and connects to E. Lake Hazel.ACHD and Meridian Fire Department have granted their approval of this emergency access. Without this Page 7 Page 345 Item#8. Exhibit A access, this property will be limited to no more than 30 homes until such time that the emergency access is constructed. To remediate this, Staff is recommending the emergency access is built prior to the Applicant receiving any building permit approval. Staff is supportive of this emergency access but does have concerns on what its future use will be once the stub street to the west connects with the adjacent subdivision and offers the required secondary access. The Applicant has not discussed the future plans for this access with Staff but the submitted master plan depicts the church site using this emergency only access as a way to drive from one side of the church to the other for ease of access and emergency response. So long as this road is not used for parking while this road is meant for emergency access, Staff finds no concerns with this. Once the emergency access is not needed, however, Staff recommends the Applicant work with ACHD to keep the road for the church site to gain an additional access point, albeit limited. The revised preliminary plat shows a private alley that connects to the future western stub street and the proposed cul-de-sac.As stated above, Staff is unaware ofACHD's formal approval of this location but has also not been given notice of its denial. The Applicant should continue working with ACHD to ensure the location of the alley meets all ACHD requirements. The proposed alleyway is shown as 20 feet wide which meets UDC and Fire requirements; the alleyway will be deemed as a no parking zone for its entirety. Staff supports this alleyway and the alley loaded type of home for this development. G. Parking(UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table II- 3C-6 for single-family detached and attached dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit.Future development should comply with these standards.No parking plan was submitted with the application. The proposed street sections(33 feet wide) of the local streets within the development, shown on the submitted plat, accommodate parking on both sides of the street where no driveways exist. The alleyway for the alley-loaded homes will be required to be labeled as `No Parking." Each townhome will be required to meet the off-street parking standards and Staff encourages the developer of this site to include provisions within their HOA bylaws that prohibit garages being used as storage. This would help alleviate some of the parking issues seen throughout the City. Parking requirements for the future church site will be reviewed with the future conditional use permit application. H. Pathways (UDC 11-3A-8): No multi-use pathways are proposed or required with this development because the master pathways plan shows a multi-use pathway along the opposite side of the Ten Mile Creek on an adjacent parcel. This Applicant is proposing attached sidewalks along all local streets that will connect to this future multi-use pathway as the property to the west develops and the proposed stub street is extended westward. These sidewalks should help improve pedestrian and cyclist connectivity from this development to other services within a mile. I. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-17): Five-foot attached sidewalks are proposed along all internal local streets. There is no existing sidewalk along E. Lake Hazel Road and Lake Hazel is expected to be widened in 2024 according to ACHD, as stated above.Detached sidewalks are required along arterial roadways per UDC 11-3A-17. The Applicant has already agreed to dedicate additional right of way to ACHD for the future widening of Lake Hazel. Therefore, Staff is recommending that the Applicant construct at Page 8 Page 346 Item#8. Exhibit A least a 5-foot detached sidewalk within the required landscape buffer along Lake Hazel, outside of the ultimate ACHD right of way. J. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): A 35-foot wide street buffer is required adjacent to E.Lake Hazel Road because it is both an arterial roadway and noted as an entryway corridor. This buffer should be landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C and placed into a common lot that is at least 35-feet wide; this common lot should also contain the detached sidewalk required along all arterial roadways. The submitted landscape plan depicts a 25 foot wide landscape buffer; the correct number of trees appear to be shown on the submitted landscape plans (see Section VII.D). The Applicant shall be required to submit revised plans depicting the correct size landscape buffer along E. Lake Hazel. In addition, the improvements required outside of the ultimate ROW should be constructed prior to receiving building permit approvals. The submitted open space exhibit does not count this buffer area as qualified open space for the residential development because only a small portion of this buffer abuts the future residences. Normally, half of this area would count towards qualified open space. Staff believes the required landscape buffer and detached sidewalk should be constructed with the residential development and not the church site. Therefore, Staff is recommending a condition of approval to complete the frontage improvements prior to receiving building permit approval and revise the open space exhibit to show this area on the open space exhibit to give a more complete open space calculation. Common open space is required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11- 3G-3E. The total square footage of common open space are included in the Landscape Calculations/Requirements table along with the required number of trees to demonstrate compliance with UDC standards but has not been updated to depict the new layout. Staff recommends the Applicant submit a revised landscape plan at least ten (10)days prior to the City Council hearing to show the new layout and match the other revised plans. Also shown on the landscape plan is an area directly to the west of Lot 34, Block 1 that is within the Ten Mile Creek easement. This area of the development is not open on both ends and does not offer easy visibility. Staff is concerned with potential safety and crime issues in this small area. UDC 11-3G-3D.3 states that "common open space shall be located in areas of high visibility to avoid hidden areas and corners..." This area is not qualifying open space because it is not open on both ends but it is still common open space and must adhere to these standards. Therefore, Staff is recommending a condition of approval that this area be part of Lot 34, Block 1 to alleviate this potential safety issue. In addition, the Applicant is proposing an additional 8 trees in order to mitigate trees that are being lost with the development of this site. This note is stated on the submitted landscape plan. K. Qualified Open Space (UDC 11-3G): A minimum of 10%qualified open space meeting the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B is required. The proposed future Church site is not required to meet open space standards. Therefore,the required qualified open space for this development shall be based upon only the portion of the property where the residential use is proposed. According to the Applicant,the residential area is approximately 6.05 acres. Based on this size,the Applicant should supply at least 0.6 acres of qualified open space,or approximately 26,000 square feet. The applicant is proposing 1.08 acres of open space,of which 0.75 acres is proposed as qualifying open space. Staff has concerns with one area of this open space and its eligibility to qualify. The largest common open space lot is approximately 15,000 square feet and sits between the proposed residences and the future church site. It is the intention of the Applicant that this open space lot would serve as open space for both the residential part of this development and for the Page 9 Page 347 Item#8. Exhibit A children attending the future church site.Again, the church site is not required to have open space but Staff understands the desire to share this space in the future. To ensure this open space lot stays with the residential development and is used by the residences, it should be made clear that the future homeowners association is to own and maintain this lot, and not the church owner. In addition to this common open space lot, the Applicant is proposing open space around the cul- de-sac that terminates at the southern end of the development. This area is proposed to contain a water feature and seating area for residents to enjoy. Part of this open space also runs within the Ten Mile Creek Easement and creates a small "green-way"from the western stub street and back into this water feature area; this proposed area is qualifying. The Ten Mile Creek and this "green-way"can be utilized for both open space and offer a great green space for the proposed townhomes to front on. Staff is concerned the proposed townhomes from off of the alley and the Applicant is missing an opportunity to give those future homeowners along the creek an additional green space area. Because of this, Staff is recommending a condition of approval that the townhomes front towards the green space and not on the alley. On the revised open space exhibit(Section VILE) there is an area less than 5,000 square feet located between the alley and the local street. UDC requirements state that in order for this area to be qualifying it must be at least 50'by 100'in dimension. Staff uses their discretion when the open space area can meet the 5,000 square foot area requirement but may not meet the precise dimensions above. In this case, this area meets neither of these benchmarks and Staff believes it is not qualifying open space. With this area removed from the open space calculations, Staff has calculated that the qualified open space for the site is approximately 0.64 acres, or approximately 10.57%. The proposed open space still meets UDC minimum requirements and Stafffinds that the open space with the water feature and the large open space lot in the center of the development are sufficient for the number of homes proposed in this development. The required landscape buffer along E. Lake Hazel should be shown on the open space exhibit even though it is not qualifying open space.As stated above, Staff recommends these improvements be completed with development of the residential portion of the site. The open space exhibit should be revised to show this area to give a more complete picture of all open space on the site in accordance with UDC 11-3G-3. L. Qualified Site Amenities (UDC 11-3G): Based on the area of the proposed plat(approximately 6 acres for the residential component),a minimum of one(1)qualified site amenity is required to be provided per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3C. Even if the amenities were based on the entire 14 acre parcel, one(1)qualified site amenity would still be required. The applicant has proposed one (1)qualified amenity: a seating area with a water feature located at the end of the new local street. This water feature shows a small fountain and boulders that also flows into a small stream channel. The proposed amenity meets the minimum UDC requirements and Staff finds it to be a nice amenity for the community. M. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-61 11-3A-7): All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. Fencing is shown on the landscape plan but is not made clear as to what type of fencing it is. Fencing shown next to any open space shall be open-vision or semi-private fencing per UDC requirements. This fencing requirement applies to the area of the property that abuts the Ten Mile Creek. The Ten Mile Creek itself is not located on this site but its easement does. Ten Mile Creek is to remain Page 10 Page 348 Item#8. Exhibit A open as this Applicant does not have rights to it. The creek should be protected during development on this site. N. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): The Applicant has submitted sample elevations of the attached single-family homes for this project(see Section VII.G). The submitted elevations show all single-story attached structures with two-car garages and similar finishing materials of stucco, masonry, and wood. In addition, the elevations show both shed roof and traditional pitched roof designs. The Applicant has not stated there will only be single-story attached structures. Staff has also not received updated elevations for the townhome style product. The submitted sample elevations appear to meet design requirements for single- family homes. Because the proposed local street running north-south is straight and relatively long, Staff is recommending that future homes are built across varying setbacks to provide variation along the street and help ensure there is not a monotonous wall plane of homes along this street. Attached and townhome single-family residential require design review approval prior to building permit submittal. This requirement gives staff the opportunity to review the site plan and ensure compliance with the above noted recommendation. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation and zoning with the requirement of a Development Agreement and approval of the requested preliminary plat with the conditions noted in Section VIII.A per the findings in Section IX of this staff report. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on June 18,2020. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject Annexation and Preliminary Plat requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing: a. In favor: Tamara Thompson,Applicant Representative; Daryl Zachman,Pastor of church to be developed in the future. b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Tamara Thompson; Daryl Zachman d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presentinggpplication: Joseph Dodson f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. No issues—Daryl Zachman commented on location of shared open space and the temporary emergency-only access along the west boundar. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission. a. Removal or modification of Staff condition 3.B and the feasibility of either outcome; b. Location and size of the large common open space lot shared between the future Church site and this preliminary_plat; and issue of who will own and maintain this shared open space lot; c. Whether this plat should be combined with the future conditional use permit required for the Church site and how the two projects will function together-, d. Wants Applicant to look at some sort of netting to prevent broken windows from the ad jacent golf course. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: Page 11 Page 349 Item#8. Exhibit A a. Modify condition LF to include language that requires the future HOA and the Church enter into a use agreement to ensure perpetual maintenance of the common open space located on Lot 2,Block 2; b. Remove condition 3.B from the staff report. 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. Applicant has not submitted any information on the netting that Commission wanted them to discuss internally; Council should discuss whether they want to condition netting along the eastern boundary or not. C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on August 11,2020. At the public hearing the Council moved to approve the subject Annexation and Preliminary Plat requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing a. In favor: Tamara Thompson,The Land Group(Applicant Rep.):Kit Fitzgerald. b. In opposition: Annette Alonso. Southern Rim Coalition C. Commenting: Tamara Thompson,Annette Alonso. and Kit Fitzgerald d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Joseph Dodson,Current Associate Planner f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Open space location: b. Density concerns for this area of the City: C. Road connectivity to future projects to the west; d. School enrollment and capacity. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Guest parking and where that could occur onsite, specifically for the townhome units: b. Expected demographic of homebuyers in this neighborhood related to how it might affect nearby school enrollment that is already an issue- C. Whether there is a need to add a condition for netting along homes abutting the golf course to the east as requested by the Commission or if it should be left to individual homeowners on how they would like to mitigate any future issues, 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation. a. None Page 12 Page 350 Item#8. Exhibit A VII. EXHIBITS A. Annexation Legal Description and Exhibit Map ANNEXATION Cs '' ". Page 10F 1 LAND 6RR0UP February 19,2020 Project No.:119022 ANNEXATION CALVARY CHAPEL TREASURE VALLEY INC. A parcel of land as shown on Record of Survey Number 2880,recorded as Instrument Number 94050954,records of Ada County,situate in a portion of Government Lot 3,Section 4, Township 2 North, Range 1 East,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the North Quarter Corner of said Section 4(from which the Northwest Corner of said Section 4 bears South 89'56'28"West,2651.66 feet distant); Thence on the north/south midsection line of said Section 4,South 00'37'05"West, 1356.13 feet; Thence leaving said north/south midsection line and on the southerly and westerly boundary of said parcel shown on Record of Survey Number 2880,South 89'59'56"West,21.00 feet; Thence North 28'52'16"West,82.77 feet; Thence North 34'04'12"West,1548.37 feet to a point on the north section line of said Section 4; Thence on said north Section line North 89'56'28"East,943.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING The above described parcel contains 14.87 acres,more or less. PREPARED BY: The Land Group,Inc. �jU LA o 0 a 13` geOF0 e ` A4s. C�?/19/2U2b 4('L'7.r-a,i;"8 ors 'D?tie.:3u€ta 1,10_Eag1c,Aaf)o 83S.8 209 g ,4041 the, andyroupi;lc,com Page 13 Page 351 Item#8. Exhibit A W EAST LAKE HAZEL ROAD N1/4 CORNER fr SECTION 4 T.2N.,R.1 E.,B.M. DO ——— (BAST$DF BEAR1ff — — ]. POB RM1 \• R/W NB9°56'28"E 943.00'R/W • R/W NW CORNER j 8q$566 8 W CALVARY CHAPEL TREASURE VALLEY INC. SECTION 4 \ 3727 E.LAKE HAZEL RD. T.2N.,RA E.,B.M. \ APN:S1404212435 m M \ ANNEXATION AREA + — \ AREA:±14.87 Acres. N (o 0 lJ,�\ ENS a 13 \ \ OF\GP 0V19/nn N28°52'16"W 82.7T ! N89°59'56"E 21.00' Exhibit " 0 250' 500, i3'" I� Horizontal Scale:l"=250' Pmject No:119022 Date of Issuance:February 19,2020 n == ==THE Calvary Chapel Treasure Valley Inc. rye$ LAND Annexation o m GROUP r woo EE Page 14 Page 352 Item#8. Exhibit A B. Master Development Concept Plan �- - - - - - LLI \ JJJ 111111 t �• I I }\ a I mn mo7� \ � G \ \ � I I Y e \ s Page 15 Page 353 Item#8. Exhibit A C. Original Preliminary Plat(date: 4/15/2020) tee., \ -- s. \\ \ n of \ \ 9 µ �a;oy g ♦\ yov^ SI l \ 9w \ ♦ \'e�mm u a \w s W ♦ I \\mw \I �� RI N \ r i m POIEMA SUBDIVISION ? 9 ° woEreKs 3727 E.LAKE HAZEL ROAD,MERIDIAN,ID - LOT DIMENSIONS t Page 16 Page 354 Exhibit A D. REVISED Plat(dated: 06/15,12020 7/30/2020) wore —T---------------------- ------------ -------------- - --------------------------- ----------\---------------------- --------- 49 69 Ar w, x N \\ YI \,Rv POIFIVA SUBDIVISION ow RON 3727 E.LAKE HAZEL ROAD,MERIDIAN,ID LOT DIMENSIONS 4 0 Page 17 Exhibit A RS 2� 11 El --------- - - h ---- - --- -------------'� -- -- -- ��\\�f�. \� \�� \\\\,��/ � � i� � � � � Ili 7,1 ANl k\ Ee& ' N OIEMA SUBDIVISION WORKS rIj 3727 E LAKE HAZEL ROAD,MERIDIAN,ID P CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING LAN Page 18 Item#8. Exhibit A E. Open Space Exhibit(dated: 06,115,12020 August, 2020) L E� 4 I 1 � I r r D -< 7 z Z rm ■ a 0 Q N JI a -M O ■ z Z m n [n r➢ n O Y cn z m n n C ■ v II m W ti II x n a " C I++ q W_ LF1 ■, Nn n Z m N ■ m $ y1 C Z 7 C � N Vy q� P � mm N Page 19 Page 357 Exhibit A F. Landscape Plan(date: 4/3,QO20 8/03/2020) ---------- -------- --- ------- m mmm 40� -------------------- 71 V,z N fa — Oct L4�11 D R M yaE A SUBDIVISION 6- Dave Evans Construction CD KH E�KE H�L ROAD ftnd-Id,h,MN2 PO"m Page 20 Item#8. Exhibit A rrl cl Cal it nMRTHE ,,.. - �LAHO GROUP El M y co u CL �� j"� ae�mtr ro�mai. Water Feature Bode Enlargement L Preliminary Plat-Landscape-Area B =_ �•,.e p L1.02 PFIMTE OM PLMMMM - �OOABfl119AllYY- 32 MAIL VL,s 3 iPtII POBLVY# bom COmL[ MEN CLM a�P}5,4G n 6 N2a "Ia01/1tlUAa1�0' }raAfr63�C F,.AMfQi� fi CWFL'r[PACH } Water Feature Node Enlargement Page 21 Page 359 t. vA w:Fe.< i I� i 11 ,, l� J' ,.rows;� I■ I w I Item#s. Exhibit A LU Zach Evans Construction Page 23 Page 361 Item#8. Exhibit A VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. A Development Agreement(DA)is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption,and the developer. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the submitted and revised plans and conceptual building elevations for the attached single- family and townhome dwellings included in Section VII and the provisions contained herein. b. The Applicant shall comply with the ordinances in effect at the time of application submittal. c. Direct lot access to E. Lake Hazel Road shall be prohibited. d. The entire frontage improvements along E. Lake Hazel Road shall be completed with the first phase of development. e. The proposed townhome units shall front on open space and not on the alleyway, especially those units facing the Ten Mile Creek. £ Lot 2,Block 2 shall be a non-buildable lot in perpetuity eik%ed and m.,inta noa and the Church and future homeowner's association shall enter into a use agreement to ensure continued maintenance of this lot. 2. At least(10) days prior-to the City Geeneil hearing,the Appheant shall siibmit eeneeptual building elevations of the proposed townheme units. 3 Ten( 0) daysprior-to the City r,,unei he -i fig,the The revised preliminary plat included in Section VII.ED, dated n^"�20 July 30,2020, "l"'ll be— sea as f llewF is approved as submitted. a. Ada-a fiete prohibiting-dir-eet lot aeeess via E. Lake Hazel R^vb. Show Lot 34, Bleek 1,to ineltide that eemmen open spaee area et4side of its c^c� , adding it to this lot and removing it from any eommen lot to eliminate a petential safety e. Geer-dinate with the AC14D and Staff en the final position ef the proposed alle��Vay fe the tevffiheme tmits that meets all required City a-ad AC14D standards. This eenditie shall be satisfied at least ten(10) days prior-to the City Couneil heafing or-the pr-oj eet wi14 Page 24 Page 362 Item#8. Exhibit A �x� t ,itt, n Guru a t �9�6$e�t�ee�-A"�r�vrr'r�vr te�eusur�ca �re�em��cri safety at this inter-seetion-. 4 Ten(l n` days prior-to the City r,,unei i ear-i fig,the The revised landscape plan included in Section VILF, dated 05,104,L2020 August 3.2020. shall be revised follows is aooroved. a. ; all feflein shall eemply with thestandaMs listed in UDG 11 3A-7. b. ; !a-adseape ealeiil4ions shall also be r-efleeted in the ea4eiila4iens table. c. Geffeet the!a-ndseape btiffer-along E. Lake Hazel te show the r-eqttir-ed 35 feet buff-e width in aeeer-da-aee with the dimensional standar-ds for-R 15 zoning distr-iet,UPC 11 2A 7. 5. , VILE shall be fvvised!a show the r-e"ir-ed 35 feet!afldseape buffer-along E. THA-71-4- show this area in the ealeuWiens table. 6. Future development shall be consistent with the R-15 dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7 for all buildable lots. 7. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 8. Staff recommends the Applicant work with ACHD on allowing the emergency only access as an additional access for the church site after the parcel to the west develops and provides a secondary access into the development. 9. An exhibit shall be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks, fencing, building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via the common driveway; if a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street,the driveway shall be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway as set forth in UDC 1I- 6C-3D. 10. The Applicant shall obtain Conditional Use Permit approval prior to development of the future church site,per UDC Table 11-2A-2. 11. Administrative Design Review application is required to be submitted and approved prior to submittal of any building permit applications for single-family attached dwellings and townhomes, as applicable. 12. Future homes along the proposed"Street A" shall provide variation in building setbacks to provide for an attractive streetscape. A master plan depicting varying building setbacks shall be submitted with the required design review applications. 13. The Ten Mile Creek that abuts the subject site along its western boundary shall be protected during construction. 14. The Applicant shall construct a temporary turnaround with a minimum turning radius of 45 feet at the end of the proposed western stub street in alignment with ACHD policies. The turnaround is required until such time that the stub street connects to future streets in the development to the west. Page 25 Page 363 Item#8. Exhibit A B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 A street light plan will need to be included in the final plat application. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the City's Design Standards. 1.2 An FLDP(Flood Plain Development Permit)is required. Currently the property is within an "A Zone". Study submitted requires culvert on Lake Hazel to be replaced and LOMR completed to change maps. 1.3 Sanitary sewer mains are not allowed in common driveways. 1.4 Applicant to provide"to and through" sanitary sewer mainline connection to the property to the west. 1.5 The water main extension in E. Lake Hazel Road is shown in the wrong utility corridor, as depicted on the conceptual engineering submitted with the application. The water main should remain north of center-line instead of being moved south of center-line. hi addition, the water main in E. Lake Hazel Road needs to be a 12-inch diameter,not an 8-inch diameter as shown.We prefer to have a mainline stub or service line (whichever is needed)to the future church lot to eliminate cutting the new road in the future. 1.6 The geotechnical investigative report prepared by MTI(Materials Testing&Inspection) dated March 7,2003,and updated July 24,2020,indicates some very significant groundwater and soils concerns,and specific construction considerations and recommendations. The applicant shall be responsible for the strict adherence of these considerations and recommendations to help ensure that homes are constructed upon suitable bearing soils, and that shallow groundwater does not become a problem with home construction.pia required to submit up to date ground water-monitoring data based upon eur-r-ent adopted building eodes,as well as any other-updated geoteehnien!information or- 1.7 Due to the very significant groundwater and soils concerns on site, structures are to be founded on conventional reinforced spread footings and walls, and slab-on-grade foundations. 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit Page 26 Page 364 Item#8. Exhibit A an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2"x I I"map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year- round source of water(MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B.Whitney at(208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. Page 27 Page 365 Item#8. Exhibit A 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT(MFD) https:llweblink.meridiancity.or lWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=186859&dbid=0&redo=MeridianC i &cr--1 D. POLICE DEPARTMENT(MPD) https:llweblink.meridiancity.org/WebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=186743&dbid=0&redo=MeridianC iv E. BOISE PROJECT BOARD OF CONTROL(BPBC) https:llweblink.meridiancity.or lWebLinkIDocView.aVx?id=188199&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ity Page 28 Page 366 Item#8. Exhibit A F. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) https:llweblink.meridianciV.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=188719&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ky G. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT(CDH) https:llweblink.meridianciU.orglWebLink/DocView.aspx?id=188182&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ky H. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https:llweblink.meridiancily.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=190509&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC iv IX. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment to R-I5 and proposed uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, if all provisions of the Development Agreement and conditions of approval are complied with. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed districts, specifically the purpose statement; Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment will allow for the development of single- family detached homes which will contribute to the range of housing opportunities available within the City, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and the purpose statement of the residential districts. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health,safety, and welfare; Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to,school districts; and Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment will not result in an adverse impact on the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. Council finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City per the Analysis in Section V. B. Preliminary Plat Findings: In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat, the decision-making body shall make the following findings: Page 29 Page 367 Item#8. Exhibit A 1. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; Council finds that the proposed plat, with Staffs recommendations, is in substantial compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density, transportation, and pedestrian connectivity. (Please see Comprehensive Plan analysis and other analysis in Section V of this report for more information) 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; Council finds that public services will be provided to the subject property with development. (See Section VIII of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers) 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the development at their own cost, Council finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development based upon comments from the public service providers(i.e.,Police,Fire,ACHD, etc). (See Section VII for more information) 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and, Council is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated with the platting of this property.ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis and approves of the project. 6. The development preserves significant natural,scenic or historic features. Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that exist on this site that require preserving. The Ten Mile Creek does not reside on this property but its easement will be respected. Page 30 Page 368 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Development Agreement Between the City of Meridian and T&M Holdings, LLC (Owner/Developer) for Ascent Townhomes Page 369 Item#9. ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-110269 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=52 HEATHER LUTHER 08/26/2020 02:46 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES: 1. City of Meridian 2. T&M Holdings LLC, Owner/Developer THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this Agreement), is made and entered into this day of 2020, by and between City of Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State o daho,hereafter called CITY whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian,Idaho 83642 and T&M Holdings LLC,whose address is PO Box 2640,Eagle,ID 83616, hereinafter called O"ER/DEVELOPER. 1. CITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer is the sole owner, in law and/or equity, of certain tract of land in the County of Ada,State of Idaho,described in Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, herein after referred to as the Property; and 1.2 WHEREAS,Idaho Code§ 67-651 lA provides that cities may,by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of zoning that the Owners and/or Developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject Property; and 1.3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Section 11-513-3 of the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re-zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS,Owner/Developer have submitted an application for annexation and zoning of 5.25 acres of land with an R-15 (medium-high density residential) zoning district on the property listed in Exhibit "A" (attached), under the Unified Development Code, which generally describes how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.5 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer made representations at the public hearing before the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission and the Meridian City Council, as to how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.6 WHEREAS, the record of the proceedings for requested annexation and zoning before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, includes responses of government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction, and includes further testimony and comment; and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—ASCENT TOWNHOMES(H-2019-0122) PAGE 1 OF 8 Page�70 1.7 WHEREAS,on the 7th day of July,2020,the Meridian City Council approved certain Findings.of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order = ("Findings"),which have been incorporated into this Agreement and attached as Exhibit`B"; and 1.8 WHEREAS, the Findings require the Owner/Developer to enter into a Development Agreement before the City Council takes final action on final plat; and 1.9 WHEREAS,Owner/Developer deem it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and request; and 1.10 WHEREAS,City requires the Owner/Developer to enter into a development agreement for the purpose of ensuring that the Property is developed and the subsequent use of the Property is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement,herein being established as a result of evidence received by the City in the proceedings for zoning designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property-owners and`to-ensure zoning designation are in accordance with the amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian on October 11, 2016, Resolution No. 16-1173, and the UDC, Title 11. NOW, THEREFORE., in consideration of the covenants and-conditions set forth herein,the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth-in full. 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement the following words,terms,and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for,unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 CITY: means and refers to the City of Meridian,a party to this Agreement, which is a municipal Corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Broadway Avenue,Meridian, Idaho 83642. 3.2 OWNER/DEVELOPER: means and refers to T&M Holdings LLC,whose address is PO Box 2640, Eagle, ID 83616, the party that owns and is developing said Property and shall include any subsequent owners(s) or developer(s) of the Property. 3.4 PROPERTY: means and refers to that certain parcel(s)of Property located in the County of Ada,City of Meridian as described in Exhibit"A"describing DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—ASCENT TowNHOMES(H-2019-0122)-:- PAGE 2 OF 8 Page 371 Item#9. the parcel to be bound by this Development Agreement and attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall vest the right to develop the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed under the UDC. 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1. Owner/Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat, landscape plan, qualified open space exhibit and conceptual building-elevations included in Section VII of the Staff Report that attached to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law attached as Exhibit`B" and the provisions contained therein. b. Future development shall comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual and the design guidelines contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan(TMISAP).An application for Design Review shall be submitted and approved for the single-family attached and townhome structures prior to submittal of building permit applications. c. The front yard of each individual lot shall be landscaped with a combination of lawn, groundcover, shrubs and trees as set forth in the TMISAP (see 3-37). d. The Homeowner's Association shall be responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping within the development including that on individual homeowner lots as proposed by the Applicant. e. All structures in this development shall have pitched roofs with symmetrical hips or gables, with a pitch between 4:12 and 12:12 and have an overhang of at least 12 inches up to a maximum of 2.5 feet beyond the fagade of the building. Roof brackets and rafter tails are encouraged as set forth in the TMISAP(see 3-41). f. Garages shall be designed with two (2) separate garage doors as set forth in the TMISAP (see 3-33). g. Public art with a high quality of design shall be incorporated into the design of streetscape along W. Franklin Rd.as set forth in the TMISAP (see 3-47). h. The temporary right-of-way easement via W.Franklin Rd. over the common lot(Lot 9,Block 6) shall be released when a local street connection is constructed to this site from a neighboring development;-at such time, the easement shall be released and access will be restricted to emergency and pedestrian access only. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—ASCENT TOWNHOMES(H-20 19-0122) PAGE 3 OF 8 Page 372 Item#9. 6. COMPLIANCE PERIOD This Agreement must be fully executed within six (6) months after the date of the Findings for the annexation and zoning or it is null and void. 7. DEFAULT/CONSENT TO DE-ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: 7.1 Acts of Default. Either party's failure to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement shall constitute default under this Agreement. 7.2 Notice and Cure Period. In the event of Owner/Developer's default of this Agreement, Owner/Developer shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of written notice from City to initiate commencement of action to correct the breach and cure the default, which action must be prosecuted with diligence and completed within one hundred-eighty(180)days;provided,however,that in the case of any such default that cannot with diligence be cured within such one hundred eighty (180) day period, then the time allowed to cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. 7.3 Remedies. In the event of default by Owner/Developer that is not cured after notice as described in Section 7.2,Owners/Developer shall be deemed to have consented to modification of this Agreement and de-annexation and reversal of the zoning designations described herein, solely against the offending portion of Property and upon City's compliance with all applicable laws, ordinances and rules, including any applicable provisions of Idaho Code §§ 67-6509 and 67-6511. Owners/Developer reserve all rights to contest whether a default has occurred. This Agreement shall.be enforceable in the Fourth Judicial District Court in Ada County by either City or Owner/Developer, or by any successor or successors in title or by the assigns of the parties hereto. Enforcement may be sought by an appropriate action at law or in equity to secure the specific performance of the covenants,agreements,conditions,and obligations contained herein. . 7.4 Delay. In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either Owner/Developer or City is delayed for causes that are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes,the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. 7.5 Waiver. A waiver by City of any default by Owner/Developer of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the default and defaults waived and shall neither bar any other rights or remedies of City nor apply to any subsequent default of any such or other covenants and conditions. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—ASCENT TOWNHOMES(H-2019-0122) PAGE 4 OF 8 Page 373 Item#9. 8. INSPECTION: Owner/Developer shall, immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the Property as required by this Agreement or by City ordinance or policy,notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other ordinances of the City that apply to said Property. 9. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: City shall record this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, and submit proof of such recording to Owner/Developer,prior to the third reading of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the re-zoning of the Property by the City Council. If for any reason after such recordation, the City Council fails to adopt the ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property contemplated hereby,the City shall execute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement. 10. ZONING: City shall,following recordation of the duly approved Agreement,enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the Property as specified herein. 11. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The City may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit,cash deposits,certified check or negotiable bonds,as allowed under the UDC, to insure the installation of required improvements, which the Owner/Developer agree to provide, if required by the City. 12. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed,completed,and accepted by the City, or sufficient surety of performance is provided by.Owner/Developer to the City in accordance with Paragraph 11 above. 13. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That Owner/Developer agree to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian unless otherwise provided by this Agreement. 14. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY: with copy to: City Clerk City Attorney City of Meridian City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 OWNER/DEVELOPER: T&M Holdings LLC PO Box 2640 Eagle, ID 83616 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—ASCENT TOWNHOMES(H-2019-0122) PAGE 5 OF 8 Page 374 Item#9. 14.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other parry a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 15. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement,the prevailing parry shall be entitled,in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default,termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 16. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term,condition and provision hereof,and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 17. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including City's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the Owner and/or Developer,each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property,or portions thereof,except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. City agrees,upon written request of Owner and/or Developer,to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if City,in its sole and reasonable discretion,had determined that Owner and/or Developer have fully performed their obligations under this Agreement. 18. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 19. DUTY TO ACT REASONABLY: Unless otherwise expressly provided,each party shall act reasonably in giving any consent,approval,or taking any other action under this Agreement. 20. COOPERATION OF THE PARTIES: In the event of any legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third party (including a governmental entity or official) challenging the validity of any provision in this Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate in defending such action or proceeding. 21. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements,condition and understandings between Owner/Developer and City relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or understanding, either oral or written, express or implied, between Owner/Developer and City, other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided,no subsequent alteration,amendment,change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to City, to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—ASCENT TOWNHOMES(H-2019-0122) PAGE 6 OF 8 Page 375 Item#9. 21.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing re-zoning of the subject Property herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 22. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective on the date the Meridian City Council shall adopt the amendment to the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property and execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. [end of text; signatures, acknowledgements, and Exhibits A and B follow] ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. OWNE EVELOPER: T&M of i LLC 7 - By: Its: Y4AVP;C1 NJ Me IM CITY OF MERIDIAN ATTEST: By: Mayor Robert E. Simison Chris Johnson, City Clerk DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—ASCENT TOWNHOMES(H-2019-0122) PAGE 7 OF 8 Page 376 Item#9. STATE OF IDAHO } ss: County of Ada ) On this 6p, day of !� 2020,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared Douglas R Me Waster,known or identified to me to be the Manager of TM Holdings LLC and the person who signed above and acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of said Corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. CASEY GEPFORD Notary Public-State of Idaho SEAL a. ( ) Commission Number 20 02399 My Commission CASEY GEPFORD Residing at: i(*I Ut�r 2,ele, �.# '4 -�-� Comm ssion Notary iNumber 202ic-State Of 02399g My Commission Expires:f d l My Commission Expires Jun 29, 2026 STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada On this 25th day of August 2020, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Robert E.Simison and Chris Johnson,known or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk,respectively,of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public f r Ido Residing at. Ivieridian,Idaho Commission expires: 3-28-2022 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—ASCENT TOWNHOMES(H-201 g-0122) PAGE 8 OF 8 Page 377 Item#9. EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT_ Description For R415 ZONE AND ANNEXATION ASCENT SUBDIVISION A portion of the Southeast 114 of the Southwest 114 of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Aria County, Idaho being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the S114 corner of said Section 10 from which the SW comer of said Section 10 bears North 89015'34"West, 2640.54 feet: thence along the South boundary line of said Section 10 North 89915'34" West, 376.47 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said South boundary line Forth 89'15'34" West, 365.65 feet; thence leaving said South boundary line North 00034'26" East, 843.25 feet to a point on the approximate centerline of Purdarn Stub Drain; thence along said centerline South 39'15'34" East, 572.39 feet; thence leaving said centerline South 00'34'26"West, 404.77 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING_ Containing 5.25 acres. more or less. f 7729 3f71lut CF0 G. Ascent Townhomes—H-2020-0039 Page 378 Item#9. EXHIBIT A I � f � I � A �1 [i O I R J L M Q NI C) ¢I zi � � f 5,25 ACRES I I vNC, 8�A 7 729 ton 3 1 0 ° �g4Y G.G, I I I � I I i I 5.9 5.10 7897.a�' 1/4 S.10 376.47_[\ 5.16 15 ——— —l N89'15'34"W 386.65' M FRANKLIN ROAD (PUBLIC) N89'15'34"W 264q.54' RPDB—/ 5.15 BASIS OF BEARING 1QAFiO a EXHIBIT — DRAWING FOR imrol 9-251 SURVEY M5NEMEPA-DST. R-15 ZONE AND ANNEXATION SHEET No. 206B015 �OkHo83T:w1 ASCENT SUBDIVISION 1 GROUP, //��i I'7 I I ,znara4s7n GROUP, LLC LOCATED IN THE SE./4 6F ThP Sw 1/4 V SEGTWN to T.an.. O4fG.GATE RAW., 9.M.,AOA COUNTY,IDAQ 3/24M20 Ascent Townhomes—H-2020-0039 Page 379 ►tem#s. EXHIBIT B CITY OF MERIDIAN " FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW . AND DECISION& ORDER + In the Matter of the Request for Annexation of 5.25 Acres of Land with an R-15 Zoning District; and Preliminary Plat Consisting of Forty-Three(43)Buildable Lots,Eleven (11) Common Lots and One(1)Other Lot on 4.97 Acres of Land in an R-15 Zoning District for Ascent Townhomes,by Matt Schultz, Schultz Development. Case No(s).H-2020-0039 For the City Council Hearing Date of: June 23,2020 (Findings on July 7,2020) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 23,2020, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 23, 2020,incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 23, 2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 23, 2020, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR ASCENT TOWNHOMES—AZ,PP H-2020-0039 - I - Page 380 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 281 of 814 Item#9. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 23, 2020, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Annexation is hereby approved with the requirement of a Development Agreement; and Preliminary Plat is hereby approved per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of June 23,2020,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 11- 6B-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR ASCENT TOWNHOMES—AZ,PP H-2020-0039 -2- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 282 of 814 Item#9. agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of June 23,2020 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR ASCENT TOWNHOMES—AZ,PP H-2020-0039 -3 - Page 382 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 283 of 814 Item#9. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 7th day of July 2020. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED YEA COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED YEA COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED YEA COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED YEA COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED YEA MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 7-7-2020 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR ASCENT TOWNHOMES—AZ,PP H-2020-0039 -4- Page 383 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 284 of 814 Item#9. EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORTC�WEN � � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING June 23,2020 Legend DATE: ff NP e v Lcc a`err -TO: Mayor&City Council _ FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: H-2019-0122 Ascent Subdivision , LOCATION: North side of W. Franklin Rd., east of N. Black Cat Rd. in the SW 1/4 of Section 10, Township 3N.,Range 1 W. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Annexation of 5.25 acres of land with an R-15 zoning district; and,Preliminary Plat consisting of 43 buildable lots, 11 common lots and 1 other lot on 4.97 acres of land in the R-15 zoning district. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 4.97 (the configuration of the parcel has been verified to be an original parcel of record in accord with UDC 11-IA-1) Future Land Use Designation MHDR(8-12 units/acre)in the TMISAP Existing Land Use Agricultural Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family attached and townhome dwellings Current Zoning RUT in Ada County Proposed Zoning R-15 Lots(#and type;bldg/common) 43 building/11 common/1 other Phasing plan(#of phases) 1 Number of Residential Units(type 43 units(4 attached units&39 townhome units) of units) Density(gross&net) 8.65 gross/16.93 net Open Space(acres,total[%]/ 0.55 of an acre(11.5%) buffer/qualified) Amenities Tot lot with a children's play structure Physical Features(waterways, The Purdam Stub Drain crosses the northeast boundary of this hazards,flood plain,hillside) site Page l Page 384 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 285 of 814 Item#9. Neighborhood meeting date;#of March 24,2019;4 attendees attendees: History(previous approvals) H-2019-0122 Ascent Subdivision(withdrawn) B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report Yes(draft) (yes/no) • Requires ACHD No Commission Action(yes/no) • Existing Franklin Rd.was widened to 5-lanes in 2017 and fully improved with curb, Conditions gutter and sidewalk abutting the site;no ROW is required to be dedicated and no frontage improvements are required. • CIP/IFYWP Caput Ynprnremerrts Plan JGPp I k0grated Five Year Wwk Plan OFTWP). + Blata Gas dived is L-s6ed in the GIP to be widened na 5-lair"from Cherry lane to FranKlin Road tiol- Sun 20,71 and 2025. Black Cal Road is liMed in the GIP to be widened to 3-Isnesfrom Overiend Raad in Franklin Road between 2026 and 200. Access(Arterial/Collectors/State One temporary(1)access proposed via W.Franklin Rd.,an Hwy/Local)(Existin and Proposed) arterial street Traffic Level of Service Acceptable(Better than"E")—Franklin&Ten Mile Roads Stub Street/Interconnectivity/Cross 2 stub streets are proposed to the west and 2 stub streets are Access proposed to the east for future extension;no stub streets exist to this site Existing Road Network None Existing Arterial Sidewalks/ Existing sidewalk on Franklin;no buffer Buffers Proposed Road Improvements None Fire Service • Distance to Fire Station 3.4 miles—split between Fire Stations#1 and#6 • Fire Response Time Falls within 5 minute response time • Resource Reliability 63%for Fire Station#1;unknown for Station#6—does not meet the target goal of 80%or greater • Risk Identification Risk factor of 2—current resources would not be adequate to supply service to this project(see comments in Section VIII.C) • Accessibility Project meets all required access,road widths and turnarounds • Special/resource needs An aerial device is not required;the closest truck company is 6 minutes travel time(under ideal conditions)—Fire Dept. can meet this need in the required timeframe. • Water Supply Requires 1,500 gallons per minute for 2 hours;may be less if building is fully sprinklered,which all are proposed to be • Other Resources NA — Page 2 — Page 385 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 286 of 814 Item#9. Police Service • Distance to Police 3.5 miles Station • Police Response 3:5 minutes Time • Calls for Service 1,372 within a mile of site(2/1/2019—1/31/2020) • Accessibility No issues with the proposed access • Specialty/resource No additional resources are required at this time;the PD already services the needs area • Crimes 141 within a mile of site(2/1/2020—1/31/2020) • Crashes 44 within a mile of site(2/l/2020—1/31/2020) West Ada School District 1.Distance kgrollmsQlaft Win Off.W (elem,ms, PcregrincElan.entary 992 issa 2.3 hs) RA rid ian MtddW School 1i92 USO 3.2 2.Capacity of Schools Merkldon IHigly Sdtool 1565 24Qi7 1.4 3.#of Students Enrolled Due to the abunda ns smau+4l tof growl.h in the area,West Ada is artlwelY buildlnig new schools,and boundaties are always Om I .These futore students could potentially attend Pkasant w&w Flememtwv,and Owyhee High School, 4.#of students 34 predicted for this development Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Directly adjacent Services • Sewer Shed South Black Cat Trunkshed • Estimated Project See application Sewer ERU's • WRRF Declining 13.92 Balance • Project Consistent Yes with WW Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts/Concerns None Water • Distance to Water Directly adjacent Services • Pressure Zone 2 • Estimated Project See application Water ERU's • Water Quality None Concerns • Project Consistent Yes with Water Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns None — Page 3 — Page 386 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 287 of 814 Item#9. C. Project Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map (fLegend Legend PP6- i Laca ixin -- - iU Pru e; Lcc ci I Iti�r�tial • M1 _ } - I Density Mi"xed Erroloyrnebt Lw D e f s ity H i MD a sty Emplaymi*lit Residen i€" ICU-Re s k Zoning Map Planned Development Map Legend i R: y u ffLegen-d 1 0Pr, 'ec Loca=or IetProjecf LacafiGn ---' -= R- R-15 ;_ CityLirnit4 '. RUT — Planrned Parcels R1 R RU , hA1 R',11 : _ N11 R- RUT R - - Ic III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Matt Schultz, Schultz Development—PO Box 1115,Meridian, ID 83680 B. Owner: Christiansen Family Limited Partnership—576 E.Vivid Sky Dr.,Meridian,ID 83642 — Page 4 — Page 387 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 288 of 814 Item#9. C. Representative: Same as Applicant IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper notification published in newspaper 5/13/2020 6/5/2020 Radius notification mailed to property owners within 300 feet 5/12/2020 6/2/2020 Public hearing notice sign posted 5/12/2020 6/10/2020 on site Nextdoor posting 5/12/2020 6/2/2020 V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS Staffs analysis on the project's consistency with the guidelines in the TMISAP applicable to this development are in italics. LAND USE: This property is designated MHDR(Medium High Density Residential) on the Future Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan and is within the area governed by the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (TMISAP). The MHDR designation allows for a mix of dwelling types including townhouses,condominiums, and apartments. Residential gross densities should range from 8 to 12 dwelling units per acre. These areas are relatively compact within the context of larger neighborhoods and are typically located around or near mixed use commercial or employment areas to provide convenient access to services and jobs for residents. Developments need to incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place and should also incorporate connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways, attractive landscaping and a project identity. Per the TMISAP,MHDR designated areas should include a mix of housing types such as row houses, townhouses,condominiums and apartments with higher densities near MU-C and Employment designated areas transitioning to smaller-scale and lower density buildings as the distance increases from higher intensity uses. The proposed development includes a mix of single family attached dwellings and townhome units at a gross density of 8.65 units per acre is consistent with the mix of uses and density desired in MHDR designated areas. Part of the larger MHDR (&HDR) designated area to the east closer to MU-C designated land has already developed with apartments at a higher density as desired; the remainder of the MHDR designated area surrounding this site has not yet developed. TRANSPORTATION: The ACHD Capital Improvements Plan(CIP)/Integrated Five Year Work Plan(IFYWP) lists Black Cat Rd. to be widened to 5 lanes from Cherry Ln. to Franklin Rd.between 2021 and 2025; and Black Cat Rd. to be widened to 3 lanes from Overland Rd.to Franklin Rd.between 2026 and 2030. Franklin Rd. was widened to 5 lanes in 2017 and fully improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk abutting the site. Street Network(3-17): The Transportation System Map included in the TMISAP does not depict any streets planned through this site. — Page 5 Page 388 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 289 of 814 Item#9. Connectivity(3-17): Connectivity to adjacent parcels is proposed with two (2)stub streets to the west and two (2)stub streets to the east which will result in connected neighborhoods and better access for emergency personnel in accord with the Plan. Perugia St., a local street to the east should connect to the northern east/west street(W. Tomahawk St.) in this development when the property to the east redevelops, which will provide a connection to Franklin Rd. via Umbria Hills Ave. Access Control(3-17): In order to move traffic efficiently through the Ten Mile area, direct access via arterial streets is prohibited except for collector street connections. Until the property to the north redevelops and a street network is established in this area, this site has no other access than W. Franklin Rd., an arterial street. A temporary access via Franklin is proposed until such time as access is available from the adjacent property then the access will be closed except for emergency and pedestrian access, in accord with the Plan. Complete Streets (3-19): The TMISAP incorporates the concept of"complete streets,"meaning all streets should be designed to serve all users, including bicycles and pedestrians unless prohibited by law or where the costs are excessive or where there's clearly no need(pg. 3-19). The proposed development includes attached and detached sidewalks for pedestrian use and on-street parking but no bicycle lanes; because no collector streets are proposed, Staff does not recommend bicycle lanes are required. Streetscape(3-25): All streets should include street trees within the right-of-way. The proposed development incorporates tree-lined streets with detached sidewalks along the main north/south street (W.. Chair Lift St) through the development from Franklin Rd. adjacent to alley-loaded lots. The east/west streets (W.. Chair Lift St. & W. Ski Hill St.) that provide access to front-loaded lots adjacent to Franklin Rd. (Lots 1-7, 11-14, Block 6 and Lots 3-4, Block 5) and two other front-loaded lots (Lots 2-3, Block 1) at the north end of the development have attached sidewalks. To more closely comply with the Plan,Staff recommends detached sidewalks with 6'(with root barriers) or 8'wide landscaped parkways(without root barriers)are provided along both sides of W. Ski Hill St. and W. Chair Lift St. which could be accommodated through narrower streets in these areas consistent with Traditional Neighborhood design. DESIGN: Street-Oriented Design—Residential Buildings(3-33): Usable porches should be a dominant element of these building types. Porches should be located along at least 30%of the front fagade of the buildings (the facade facing the primary street) although a higher percentage is recommended as is porches on one or more facades as well. When possible, garages should be loaded from a rear alleyway. Where garages must be accessed from the front,the garages must be located no less than 20' behind the primary faVade of the residential structure.Front-loaded 2-car garages that are visible from the primary street must be designed with two(2)separate garage doors. The proposed alley-loaded townhomes have porches along 40% of the street frontage;front-loaded townhomes and single-family attached dwellings do not have porches facing the internal street but do have covered patios facing Franklin Rd. at 56%of the street frontage although they won't be visible because a 6'tall solid vision fence is proposed to provide privacy of rear yards. Front-loaded garages are not located 20'behind the primary facade of the structure,nor do they have two(2)separate garage doors as required. With the current lot configuration, compliance with the garage setback requirement is not possible—lots would need to be widened and the number of units reduced to comply.If the number of units are reduced by 3 or fewer, the density of the development will still comply with that desired in the Ten Mile area,however, if reduced by 4 or more, the density will be below that desired in the Ten Mile area. Staff recommends the Applicant explore alternate design options to comply with this requirement while maintaining a gross density of at least 8 units per acre; an alternate plan should be submitted in accord with this provision prior to the City Council hearing. Page 6 Page 389 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 290 of 814 Item#9. All of the proposed elevations for front-loaded homes depict one garage door instead of separate garage doors for each parking space as required—these elevations should be revised to reflect separate garage doors for each parking space in accord with the Plan. Buildings to Scale(3-34): The key elements to consider are the continuity of building sizes,how the street-level and upper-level architectural detailing is treated, elements that anchor and emphasize pedestrian scale,roof forms,rhythm of windows and doors, and general relationship of buildings to public spaces such as streets,plazas, other open space and public parking. Human-scale design is critical to the success of built places for pedestrians. Staff believes the proposed 2-story homes demonstrate continuity of building sizes within the development; the street level and upper level architectural detailing corresponds with each other to unify the design, while the awnings and overhangs over the first story along with tree-lined streets and ground floor windows anchor and emphasize the pedestrian scale of the development as desired. Neighborhood Design(3-36): In the Ten Mile area, all residential neighborhoods should be developed in consideration of traditional neighborhood design principles and concepts,which include mixed housing stock, architecture and design, streetscapes and streets. A mix of housing stock is proposed consisting of single-family attached and townhome dwellings,which contribute to the diversity of housing stock desired in this area. Currently, front-and alley-loaded single-family detached homes, townhomes, and multi-family apartments exist in this area. Relatively short block lengths are proposed with several stub streets to adjacent properties,which allows for better and more convenient pedestrian and vehicle connectivity. Staff recommends landscaped parkways are provided throughout the development for a streetscape consistent with the Ten Mile Plan and neighborhood design concepts. Building Form and Character(3-37): Architectural character should establish a clear sense of place and distinct identity in each activity center and neighborhood while each building should maintain a degree of individuality. The proposed conceptual elevations demonstrate the coordination of key design elements, materials and colors, while maintaining individuality for each unit(see Section VIII.F). Building Facades: The primary facade of the structures should be placed at the minimum setback as close as possible to the street for a consistent street-scape. The primary facade should always include an entry into the building as close as possible from the primary street for direct access from adjacent public spaces. The space between a building facade and the adjacent sidewalk should be appropriately landscaped with a combination of lawns,groundcover, shrubs and trees. The Applicant states the individual yards will be maintained by the HOA for a consistent appearance;Staff recommends a combination of lawn,groundcover, shrubs and trees are provided in each front yard as desired in the Plan. Building Heights: Low-rise buildings of 2-4 stories in height over much of the area is desired. The proposed attached and townhome units are all 2-stories in height in accord with the Plan. Stoop Frontage: For street and block frontages along residential streets and areas with a moderate amount of pedestrian activity, it is recommended that ground floor elevations be 18 to 24 inches above sidewalk grade and that the individual units open directly onto adjacent rights-of-way. Because this is a smaller development and isn't in a mixed use area, there won't be a lot of non- local pedestrian activity; therefore, Staff doesn't recommend required compliance with this guideline. Porch and Fence Frontage: The porch and fence frontage provides a building facade set back from the street to allow room for a private fenced yard,which signals the break between the public realm of the street and sidewalk to the private realm of the yard and porch. Porches along the front of the building allow residents the opportunity to interact and engage in activities in the public domain Page 7 Page 390 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 291 of 814 Item#9. while maintaining a level of privacy.Although not a requirement, Staff recommends the Applicant consider this guideline in the design of the project. Roofs: Because the Ten Mile Area includes a wide variety of individual buildings, it's assumed there will be a mix of flat and pitched roofs. Pitched roofs are required for MHDR designated areas and should be,where possible,symmetrical hips or gables,with a pitch between 4:12 and 12:12 and have an overhang of at least 12 inches. The overhang can extend to a maximum of 2.5' beyond the fagade of the building.Roof brackets and rafter tails are encouraged. Staff recommends the proposed structures include roofs consistent with this guideline. Public Art(3-47): Public art with a high quality of design should be incorporated into the design of streetscapes.No public art is proposed. Staff recommends public art is provided in the streetscape in accord with the Plan; this could be incorporated into the subdivision identification sign. Goals,Objectives, &Action Items: Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this application and apply to the proposed use of this property(staff analysis in italics): • "Encourage a variety of housing types that meet the needs, preferences, and financial capabilities of Meridian's present and future residents."(2.01.02D) The proposed medium high density attached and townhome units will contribute to the variety of residential categories in the Ten Mile area as desired. • "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and urban services at the time of final approval, and in accord with any adopted levels of service for public facilities and services."(3.03.03F) City water and sewer service is available and can be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC I1-3A-21. • "Avoid the concentration of any one housing type or lot size in any geographical area;provide for diverse housing types throughout the City."(2.01.01 G) Two housing types (i.e. single-family attached and townhomes) are proposed in this development which contributes to the variety of housing types in this area.Lot sizes are proposed ranging in size from 2,057 to 6,036 with an average lot size of 2,492 square feet(sf.) which will accommodate the proposed 2-story attached and townhome units. • "Encourage compatible uses and site design to minimize conflicts and maximize use of land." (3.07.00) The proposed residential dwellings and site design should be compatible with future development on adjacent properties that are also designated for MHDR uses. • "With new subdivision plats,require the design and construction of pathway connections,easy pedestrian and bicycle access to parks, safe routes to schools,and the incorporation of usable open space with quality amenities." (2.02.01A) The proposed plat depicts a large usable common open space area at the east boundary of the site with children's play equipment as an amenity and detached sidewalks with landscaped parkways. Sidewalks are proposed along all stub streets to adjacent properties, which provide for pedestrian connectivity; no segments of the City's regional pathway are planned on this site. • "Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development."(3.03.03A) The proposed development will connect to City water and sewer systems;services are proposed to Page 8 Page 391 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 292 of 814 Item#9. be provided to and though this development in accord with current City plans. • "Require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks,water and sewer utilities."(3.03.03G) Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter and sidewalks is required to be provided with development as proposed. • "Annex lands into the corporate boundaries of the City only when the annexation proposal conforms to the City's vision and the necessary extension of public services and infrastructure is provided." (3.03.03) The proposed development plan is consistent with the City's vision in terms that medium high density residential uses are proposed. Public services and infrastructure are proposed to be provided. In summary, Staff believes the proposed development plan is generally consistent with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density and transportation. VI. STAFF ANALYSIS A. ANNEXATION&ZONING The Applicant requests annexation of 5.25 acres of land with an R-15 (Medium High-Density Residential)zoning district consistent with the Medium High Density Residential(MHDR)Future Land Use Map(FLUM) designation in the Comprehensive Plan. A preliminary plat,landscape plan and conceptual building elevations were submitted showing how the property is planned to develop with 39 townhome and 4 single-family attached units(see Section VIII). Based on the analysis above in Section V, Staff is of the opinion the requested annexation with the R-15 zoning and proposed development is consistent with the MHDR FLUM designation for this site. The proposed annexation area is contiguous to City annexed property and is within the Area of City Impact Boundary. A legal description and exhibit map for the annexation area is included in Section VII.A. The City may require a development agreement(DA) in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. In order to ensure the site develops as proposed with this application, staff recommends a DA as a provision of annexation with the provisions included in Section VIII. B. PRELIMINARY PLAT The proposed preliminary plat consists of 43 building lots, 11 common lots and 1 other lot on 4.97 acres of land in the proposed R-15 zoning district. The minimum lot size proposed is 2,057 with an average lot size of 2,492 square feet(s.f.). The plat is proposed to develop in one phase. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There are no existing structures on this site,the site is vacant/undeveloped. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The proposed subdivision and subsequent development is required to comply with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7 for the R-15 district. Staff has reviewed the proposed plat and it complies with these standards. Zero lot lines should be depicted on the plat where single-family attached and townhome structures are proposed to span across lot lines. Access(UDC 11-3A-3): One temporary right-of-way access easement is proposed on Lot 9,Block 6 via W.Franklin Rd., an arterial street; two(2)local stub streets are proposed to the west and two(2) are proposed to the east for Page 9 Page 392 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 293 of 814 Item#9. future extension and interconnectivity. The temporary right-of-way easement is required to be released when a local street connection is constructed to this site from a neighboring development; at such time, the access will be restricted to emergency and pedestrian access only. Twenty(20)foot wide public alleys are proposed for access to rear-loaded units along N. Ascent Ave. in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3B.5. All alleys should be signed"No Parking Fire Lane" and have an address sign at each entrance to the alley; each residence that has a back to an alley should have an address posted on the front of the building as well as on the alley side. Secondary emergency access to the site is not required by the Fire Dept. because all of the structures will be sprinklered. This property does not have an access easement via Zimmerman Ln.,the private lane along the west boundary of the site which is part of the property to the north. Pathways(UDC 11-3A-8): There are no pathways depicted on the Pathways Master Plan for this property. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-17): A detached sidewalk was recently constructed along the frontage of this site adjacent to W. Franklin Rd. when ACHD widened Franklin Rd. in accord with UDC standards. Detached sidewalks are proposed along the main north/south street(i.e.N. Ascent Ave.)in front of alley-loaded homes; Staff recommends detached sidewalk are also provided along all other internal streets as well in accord with traditional neighborhood design guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-17): A 10-foot wide parkway with a drainage swale exists along Franklin Rd. between the curb and detached sidewalk constructed by ACHD with the road widening project;because this area is within the right-of- way,no trees are allowed.Native vegetation(grasses and flowers)was planted in this area and will be maintained by the HOA. All parkways within the site adjacent to detached sidewalks shall be landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-313-7C. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): A 25-foot wide street buffer is required along W. Franklin Rd. (measured from back of curb),landscaped per the standards in UDC Table 11-3B-7C. A 35-foot wide buffer is proposed with landscaping in accord with UDC standards. Landscaping is required in common open space areas in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G- 3E. Trees are proposed exceeding UDC standards; however, detailed calculations should be included in the Landscape Requirements table demonstrating compliance. Qualified Open Space& Site Amenities(UDC 11-3G): Because the area of the preliminary plat is below 5 acres in size,the qualified open space and site amenity standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3 do not apply. However,the Applicant did submit a qualified open space exhibit, included in Section VIII.F, depicting 0.55 of an acre (or 11.5%) of qualified open space consisting of a large grassy common area,half the street buffer along Franklin Rd. and parkways along the detached sidewalk in front of alley-loaded homes. This calculation will actually be greater as Staff recommends parkways are provided along all internal streets. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing constructed on the site is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6 and 11-3A-7. A 6-foot tall open wrought iron fence is proposed along the northeast boundary adjacent to the Purdam Drain; and a 6-foot tall vinyl fence is proposed along the west, east and south boundaries in accord with UDC standards. Page 10 — Page 393 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 294 of 814 Item#9. Parking: On-site parking for each unit is required per the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 based on the number of bedrooms per unit. Two car garages with two (2)parking pads per unit are proposed in accord with UDC standards. A total of 32 on-street parking spaces are also available for guests per the exhibit in Section VIII.E. Waterways: The Purdam Stub Drain,an NMID facility,runs along the northeast boundary of this site within a 65' wide easement(25' on this property). Any encroachment within this easement will require a License Agreement with NMID. The drain is proposed to be piped with this development in a common lot with an exclusive NMID access easement;the HOA will be responsible for maintenance of this lot. The common lot should contain grass to prevent weeds if allowed by NMID.If not allowed, a letter to that affect should be submitted from NMID. Utilities (UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is proposed in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. Street lighting is required to be installed in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. See Section VIII.B below for Public Works comments/conditions. This project will be serviced by existing 8-inch water and sewer main stubs in W.Franklin Rd. Pressurized Irrigation System (UDC 11-3A-15): An underground pressurized irrigation(PI) system is required to be provided for each lot within the development as set forth as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. Primary pressure irrigation will be provided by Nampa&Meridian Irrigation District(NMID)via an existing regional pump station for Baraya Subdivision directly south of this site across Franklin Rd. Storm Drainage(UDC 11-3A-18 : An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. Storm drainage will be mitigated by underground seepage beds and/or shallow landscaped retention areas. Drainage swales exist within the parkway along W. Franklin Rd. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual) (TMISAP Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed 2-story townhome structures as shown in Section VII.F. Dwellings are proposed to be configured in 2, 3 and 4 attached units. Building materials are proposed to consist of a mix of horizontal and board&batten siding in a variety of colors with stone veneer accents. Dwelling units range in size from 1,400 to 1,600 square feet. Each alley- loaded unit has a front porch and each front-loaded unit has a covered patio but not a front porch as required. Final design is required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual and the design guidelines in the TMISAP as stated herein. Submittal and approval of a Design Review application is required prior to submittal of building permit application(s). VII. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Annexation&Zoning with the requirement of a Development Agreement and Preliminary Plat per the conditions included in Section VIII in accord with the Findings in Section IX. Page 11 — Page 394 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 295 of 814 Item#9. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on May 28, 2020. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Matt Schultz,Applicant's Representative b. In opposition: None c. Commenting:None d. Written testimony: Matt Schultz,Applicant's Representative(response to the staff report e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s) public testimony a. None 3. Key issues)of discussion by Commission: A. (Question regarding if there is a berm prposed within the street buffer along Franklin Rd. —the Applicant replied a 2-3' tall berm is proposed; b. In favor of the diversity of housingtypes proposed; C. In favor of the open space& site amenity—proposed which is above and beyond UDC requirements; d. In support of the proposed design over that previously proposed. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Recommend approval of waiver to DA provision#A.f as requested by the Applicant; b. Applicant to work with staff to determine the best type and placement of public art to be provided in the streetscape along Franklin Rd. 5. Outstanding issue(s)for City Council: A. The Applicant requests a waiver to DA provision#A.f,which requires front-loaded garages to be located no less than 20' behind the primary facade of the residential structure. C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on June 23,2020.At the public hearing.the Council moved to approve the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Matt Schultz,Applicant's Representative b. In opposition:None C. Commenting.None d. Written testimony: Susan Ouarnstrom e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Discussion and questions pertaining to the Applicant's request for a"waiver"to the recommended DA provision(#A.f)requiring the garages to be set back 20 feet behind the primary facade of the structure and the purpose of such requirement b. The feasibility of providing ore parking for the development—the Applicant stated more parking could possibly be provided in the common open space area on the east side of the sitel: 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation. a. Council approved the Applicant's request for a waiver of DA provision#A.f to not require garages to be set back behind the primary facade as desired in the TMISAP: Page 12 — Page 395 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 296 of 814 Item#9. Council did not approve the Applicant's request for a waiver from the requirement for public art to be provided. Page 13 — Page 396 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 297 of 814 Item#9. VIII. EXHIBITS A. Annexation&Zoning Legal Description and Exhibit Map EXHIBIT Description For R-15 ZONE AND ANNEXATION ASCENT SUBDIVISION A portion of the Southeast 114 of the Southwest 114 of Section 10, Township 3 North. Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,Ada County, Idaho being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the S114 corner of said Section 10 from which the SW comer of said Section 10 bears North 89'15'04"West,2640.54 feet; thence along the South boundary line of said Section 10 North 89"15'34"West, 375.47 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said South boundary line]North 89'1634"]Nest, 368.65 feet; thence leaving said South boundary line North 60°34'26"East, 843.25 feet to a point on the approximate centerline of Purdarn Stub Drain; thence along said centerline South 39'15'34" East, 572.39 feet; thence leaving said centerline South 00'34'26"West,464.77 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 5.25 acres, more or less. i .E rp ' 7729 Page 14 Page 397 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 298 of 814 Item#9. ti I +I I \ 1 1 f I ti Sri Ln CN CV� I ' 5.25 ACMES I I I 7729 I 22��1'55 ma's' �.'p Y I I I I f I I i 4 5,16 5.15 ——— N89'15'34"W 366.65� W. FRANKLIN ROAD (PUBLIC) S,15 N99'13'34"W 2640.54' RPDB )� BASIS OF BEARING /�,y� EXHIBIT — DRAMNG FOR .iris 40: I❑�l IQ 19-251 SURVEY PW$'w EMEFM-LST R-15 ZONE AND ANNEXATION S,�NO 941$@.3pRHG$7TJA ASCENT SUBDIMSION 1 �y{'� �'y I ,2oej eae�aza G�V OU 7 LLC WCkim IA THE SE 1/4 OFTkV SM 1/4 OF SECTION la T.3N.. On.DAB RAW.. B.M.,ADA CWNTY,IDAHO 3/24/2020 Page 398 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 299 of 814 Item#9. B. Preliminary Plat(date: 6/1/2020) -REVISED 1' ------------ • .1%�It�Mb' __ • I+ I � 57 5�.' � oft,,.:., I � — .. J 1 9 I •. —e1 s'Wl.IVYa.� DLlP�'I-L—T4APi-MA ��' t � EYE" v.xs. oc,ao•e• x e,,... `,� .t CID CLr I - 1.-I X _ � ,GEG.Yi1S111 R•NiL6'. ASUENT SUBDIVISION ry �9 1 Page 16 Page 399 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 300 of 814 ■ � � CiA4- E J ASCENT TOWNHOMES LANDSCAPE COLOR PLAq MERIDIAN, IDAHO Sn'ECk a1V Item#9. PHO.EGCIfOf®i4T:QH I H'�9C4PF eFoelis ;err r��+a�r►.: � -�'" �li!I�1;1°� i F}J''k5 t6Ff PiF'.441rF4llraT4 � �� N .. e .t IR�x� x' 7 �iTYtb'ki�kCflent�H.SE � � � R r� H7 T Lin a lsrxa-'Jac rnraa 1UAF"FA PR77AFA-K" $16RhiN�`i[R/2X eis�sa .`QM R£IWrAi1GQ1�# Vqr _ TL — _ • p 7 M--e---mmgm �3 �' Add{ •� }z. - —w Ili �l it X7LY mmw 0-LA ..7 i 3 � r R'Ti��.�y�_E �� „L.�,q... R' �.9r"'L'.7k.• C: w x st;a�xar.i s.. NEI Page 18 Page 401 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 302 of 814 Item#9. RCHEMLE - - lug mwInLu ELM Lt2 IL 1 IT•6ai_..i4' _._.... W 1 fP r. dn � L'.3 Page 19 Page 402 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 303 of 814 Item#9. TAW I*- Elm m- wair, LIT XMIR DGF ''' `IK.R x,T.T4.w.�Zi�. '?►1w!CT7.A~ � �•�i��•,•• �i41RR __ S T P 4 6 T wwa L� Page 20 — Page 403 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 304 of 814 Item#9. D. Qualified Open Space Exhibit(REVISED) & Site Amenity Detail CITY OF MERIDIAN OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS TOTAL OPEN SPACE QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE aMN SPAc2 REMIREI-INT-IOtt F7Ee,711FEE0 PR[]VIL7ED i(11A31 W aP TIE SITE, 24.213 V ZAM A[J IO% 11.14% TOTAL AREA OF THE SITE IS 41 F M SF J&97 ACE LANDSCAPE LEGEND GUA.LIF9EP OPEN yPA[.E t24;217 st nl.l4%} a s'.., I a i � 1 W.FRANKLIN ROAD Scale:9"=100'-0" 21) ASCENT TOWNHOMES ©�0036 ' ..� MERIDIAN, IDAHO OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT X2.0 Page 21 Page 404 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020- Page 305 of 814 Item#9. i 4 Tart pHl'4V4i44+M ti!4 4MA+4'FOW V mom TV fir. •;0f6 AT]A eiu.7rtl ASTM FsOT •SSG f eG�h mWedK m ktmmd t, Wl g miiNeYl vfchn1nwmoLi wth, -A9TM FS?w ran+n.'io.-.arir.+. ,ASTM F...M1 mW Y gym,kw Ihm rmymtl Op rrua.i purr W%4,4- 9�*M%mm + yt _ C'A la P+hEL i wP AvF F.mr T!*LNF TLIrPrA nr rrt 4`4 R�'PI �wr f hu+ ft" r.e i i 5 pYG 7 9mQ 1[n �n Acre 3t S bdivision Drv-V Flo'KS-1514 gqr m San' t%Vb!ler.f i' rra.'s +A` �d Recmatlan rM[We '� ,24id]Ya6 O;t�cy as W4� 265:78 ' Fo MIAafls Erols r'.,Ft Suft eAram ifW%q n Page 22 Page 405 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 306 of 814 Item#9. E. On-Street Parking Exhibit ASCENT SUBDIVISION ON—STREET PARKING 32 SPACES cc 41' 36' d f L N iV N Y fO < SU SV !i S4 I Z c� I < jry a tJ Lo N a � i 1.14 04 CA a N Y N Cr p [L 0' 99' n 99' 20 SPACE o N _ N C) 4 m 8 2' IL w 41' 2 io C) rry I cv � cw W 61 I 37, c ATTACHED WALK/NO PARKING i i j� N a� eo 39' 25 25" 29 29' 25" 25'27" 27' 27' 32' . PRI 3B' Page 23 — Page 406 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 307 of 814 Item#9. F. Conceptual Building Elevations/Perspectives&Floor Plans—REVISED 5/21/20 ?1ff'AR�g Co".Me& '+r �!x r Front-Loaded Attached Homes A42 EXTERIOR COLOR SCHEW 4Q ■ n _ cn x y iE BEVAnONSMM-ASCM u' F s U 2 T4 Ef ELEVAi[0lLSM_aq_MCEW rcwn A4-3 Page 24 — Page 407 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 308 of 814 Item#9. r ■ es 7 7 TT x w co LU - -------------- r.`t FRQidT EL,fVAiPdH `w cn - t w ' — Y - TFf 2 REAR ELEVA-nCN • sau�u¢ �tiAn:�s —A4.0 r p —,---------------. G �f 4 Jam. Page 25 — Page 408 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 309 of 814 Item#9. e� W J Gl �I {a] A 6E4H w-RAQI.IIf.96 I x { r Lj I Page 26 Page 409 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 310 of 814 Item#9. EXERRACOLOR SCHEME#! . LLI QTt�g� �IJ911 ❑ - wawrrs _ exec wan W Q crc mean.. �ER[]HS EEfVAi1019 ��_ �J to[umwf:oYt ©� 9.L LLJ x..n.awmwa:i d. IA4.2� Front-Loaded Townhomes �t n`- m .*. ■_ LL� .T. G7 J W �s y Page 27 — Page 410 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 311 of 814 Item#9. I _ ^rFnl ,e LLI EL CO n LLIQ �1 nNr ELEVA-RC tLLJ o z CO 7-17 cJ a FEAR E EVATIOH =- n4.o 41S ----- � --�r.r----ems, f C3 — - --'-- - '�_---------fir► ;'�94if 3�h1"�tr��.AtlkEn' r¢ [J e °tom► fro crro�r JW 1 Page 28 — Page 411 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 312 of 814 Item#9. r� �C �1 :rr LU CD I .......... _.. 44 d t I � Page 29 — Page 412 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 313 of 814 ■i G "e® v EXTERIOR COLOR SCHEME 91 LU 03 LU LU Cn m. 1 1 1 Garage U low e LU Page 30 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 314 of 814 ee a - - � e �- e Item#9. Alt% - i I w %':GR7N7 GL NATkYN _ T LU W 4? V] +Y i REAR ELRA7-M evn�.w -- --- G --- �� J LU -- - -------- - ---------- --= . ;g ELEVAWN I Aq tjig - I anuxrm ,�$�ELEWAT@0W 2 E:EYPILW k Page 31 — Page 414 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 315 of 814 Item#9. -C-1 Uj 4 1 6,4 _ ,LENFL;.FLO)R';LM - - i...... - u 1 o... i.. Lu C _ t .._................._ ; Page 32 — Page 415 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 316 of 814 Item#9. IX. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION l. A Development Agreement(DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s)at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat, landscape plan, qualified open space exhibit and conceptual building elevations included in Section VII and the provisions contained herein. b. Future development shall comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual and the design guidelines contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (TMISAP). An application for Design Review shall be submitted and approved for the single- family attached and townhome structures prior to submittal of building permit applications. c. The front yard of each individual lot shall be landscaped with a combination of lawn, groundcover, shrubs and trees as set forth in the TMISAP (see 3-37). d. The Homeowner's Association shall be responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping within the development including that on individual homeowner lots as proposed by the Applicant. e. All structures in this development shall have pitched roofs with symmetrical hips or gables,with a pitch between 4:12 and 12:12 and have an overhang of at least 12 inches up to a maximum of 2.5 feet beyond the facade of the building. Roof brackets and rafter tails are encouraged as set forth in the TMISAP (see 3-41). £ �z„wTo-gGarages must be aeeessed from the f rA the R o shall be ,,e tea n loss th *20 feet behind the pr-iraai=y fagade of the residential stmetur-e shall be designed with two (2) separate garage doors as set forth in the TMISAP(see 3-33). g. Public art with a high quality of design shall be incorporated into the design of streetscape along W. Franklin Rd. as set forth in the TMISAP (see 3-47). h. The temporary right-of-way easement via W. Franklin Rd. over the common lot(Lot 9, Block 6) shall be released when a local street connection is constructed to this site from a neighboring development; at such time,the easement shall be released and access will be restricted to emergency and pedestrian access only. 2. The final plat shall include the following revisions: a. Provide detached sidewalks with 6' (with root barriers)or 8' (without root barriers)wide parkways along all internal streets in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17E. b. Zero lot lines should be depicted on the plat where single-family attached and townhome structures are proposed to span across lot lines. c. Include a note that prohibits direct lot access via W. Franklin Rd. other than emergency access once local street access is available from an adjacent property. Page 33 Page 416 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 317 of 814 Item#9. 3. The landscape plan submitted with the final plat shall include the following revisions: a. Provide detached sidewalks with 6' (with root barriers)or 8' (without root barriers)wide parkways along all internal streets within the development in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17E; landscaping shall be depicted in parkways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. b. Depict grass within Lot 1,Block 1 and Lot 1,Block 5 where the Purdam Drain is located,if allowed by NMID. If not allowed, submit a letter from the Irrigation District to that effect. c. Landscaping is required in common open space areas in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3E. Trees are proposed exceeding UDC standards; however,detailed calculations should be included in the Landscape Requirements table demonstrating compliance. 4. The Applicant shall provide children's play equipment as an amenity for this development as proposed per the detail in Section VIII.D. 5. All alleys shall be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3B.5. All alleys shall be signed"No Parking Fire Lane"and have an address sign at each entrance to the alley; each residence that has a back to an alley shall have an address posted on the front of the building as well as on the alley side. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 Each individual townhouse unit shall be independently connected to sanitary sewer and water services. 1.2 After consultation with the applicant regarding the Geo Technical investigation, it is highly recommended that slab on grade foundations be installed within this development to avoid any groundwater intrusion. 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x I I"map with bearings and distances(marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. Page 34 Page 417 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 318 of 814 Item#9. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at(208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures.Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. Page 35 Page 418 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 319 of 814 Item#9. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting.A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridianciby.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=186954&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCioX D. POLICE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=186904&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity E. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT(NMID) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=187799&dbid=0&repo=Meridian City F. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT(CDHD) https://weblink.meridiancitE.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=187420&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCioy G. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=18 75 73&dbid=0&repo=Meridian City H. WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT(WASD) https://weblink.meridiancit E.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=187588&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiCE Page 36 — Page 419 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 320 of 814 Item#9. I. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https:llweblink.meridianciU.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=189350&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiV X. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-513-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the proposal to annex the subject 4.97 acre property with R-15 zoning and develop single-family attached and townhome dwellings on the site at a gross density of 8.65 units per acre is consistent with the associated MHDR FLUM designation for this property. (See section V above for more information) 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment and development complies with the purpose statement of the residential districts in that it will contribute to the range of housing opportunities for the community consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health,safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare as the proposed residential uses should be compatible with adjacent existing and future residential uses in the area. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The City Council finds City services are available to be provided to this development. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The City Council finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City. B. Preliminary Plat(UDC 11-613-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision making body shall make the following findings: (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; (Ord.08-1372,7-8-2008,eff. 7-8-2008) The City Council finds the proposed plat is generally in conformance with the UDC if the Applicant complies with the Development Agreement provisions and conditions of approval in Section VIII. Page 37 — Page 420 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 321 of 814 Item#9. 2. Public services are available or can be made available ad are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds public services can be made available to the subject property and will be adequate to accommodate the proposed development. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; The City Council finds the proposed plat is in substantial conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's CIP. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health,safety or general welfare; and The City Council finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The City Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that need to be preserved with this development. — Page 38 — Page 421 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 7,2020— Page 322 of 814 Item#10. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Development Agreement Between the City of Meridian and Justin Fishburn (Owner/Developer) for Lupine Cove Page 422 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-110270 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=40 HEATHER LUTHER 08/26/2020 02:48 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE DEVELOPMENT A PARTTES: I- City of Meridian 2. Justin Fishburn,Owner/Developer TFUS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this Agreement), is made and entered into this 25th day of August ..... 2020, by and between City of Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho,hereafter called CITY who address is 33 E.Broadway Avenue, Meridian,Idaho 83642 and Justin Fishburn,whose address is 4000N.McDermott Rd-,Meridian,IID 83646 hereinafter called LOPER. 1. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, Owner is the sole owner,in law and/or equity,of certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho,described in Exhibit"A",which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, herein after referred to as the Property,and 1.2 WHEREAS,Idaho Code§67-6511 A provides that cities may,by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of zoning that the Owners and/or Developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject Property; and 1.3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Section 11-513-3 of the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re-zoning of land;and 1.4 WHEREAS, Owner and/or Developer have submitted an application for a annexation, and zoning of 7.09 acres of land with an R-8 (medium density residential) zoning district on the property listed in Exhibit "A" (attached), under the Unified Development Code, which generally describes how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made-,and 1.5 VVHEREAS, Owner/Developer made representations at the public hearing before the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission and the Meridian City Council, as to how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made;and 1.6 NMEREAS, the record of the proceedings for requested annexation and zoning before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, includes responses of government subdivisions providing services within the DEvELopmENT AGREEMENT—LUPINE COVE(H-2019-0133) PAGE I OF 7 Item#10. City of Meridian planning jurisdiction, and includes finther testimony and comment; and 1.7 WHEREAS, on the 4 h day of August, 2020, the Meridian City Council approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order ("Findings"), which have been incorporated into this Agreement and attached as Exhibit"B"; and 1.8 WHEREAS, the Findings require the Owner/Developer to enter into a Development Agreement before the City Council takes final action on final plat;and 1.9 WHEREAS,Owner/Developer deem it to be in its best interest to he able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and request; and 1.10 WHEREAS,City requires the Owner/Developer to enter into a development agreement for the purpose of ensuring that the Property is developed and the subsequent use of the Property is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement,herein being established as a result of evidence received by the City in the proceedings for zoning designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure zoning designation are in accordance with the amended Comprehensive Plan of the City ofMeridian on October 11, 2016,Resolution No_ 16-1173, and the UDC, Title 11. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein,the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full_ 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement the following words,terms,and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for,unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 CITY: means and refers to the City of Meridian,a party to this Agreement, which is a municipal Corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Broadway Avenue,Meridian,Idaho 83642. 3.2 OWNER/DEVELOPER: means and refers to Justin Fishburn, whose address is 4000 N_McDermott Rd.,Meridian,ID 83646,the party that owns and is developing said Property and shall include any subsequent owner/developer(s)of the Property. DEvEI.opmENT AGxmAENT-LupINE CovE(H-2019-0133) PAGE 2 or 7 Page 424 Item#10. 3.4 PROPERTY: means and refers to that certain parcel(s)of Property located in the County of Ada,City of Meridian as described in Exhibit"A"describing the parcel to be bound by this Development Agreement and attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 4. USES PERMTI TED BY THIS AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall vest the right to develop the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement_ 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed under the UDC. 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1. Owner and/or Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat, landscape plan and conceptual building elevations for the single-family dwellings included in Section VIH and the provisions contained herein. b. The rear and/or sides of 2-story structures on Lots 2-4,Block 1 and Lots 2,Block 2 that face N.McDermott Road shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following:.modulation(e.g.projections,recesses,step-backs, pop-outs), bays, banding,porches, balconies, material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines.Single- story structures are exempt from this requirement. 6. COMPLIANCE PERIOD This Agreement must be fully executed within six (6) months after the date of the Findings for the annexation and zoning or it is null and void. 7. DEFAULT/CONSENT TO DE-ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: 7.1 Acts of Default. Either party's failure to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement shall constitute default under this Agreement. 7.2 Notice and Cure Period. In the event of Owner/Developer's default of this Agreement, Owners/Developer shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of written notice from City to initiate commencement of action to correct the breach and cure the default,which action must be prosecuted with diligence and completed within one hundred eighty Q 80)days;provided,however,that in the case of any such default that cannot with diligence be cured within such DEvELopmENTAo vm —Lupnc COVE(H-2019-0133) PAGE 3 of 7 Page 425 Item#10. one hundred eighty (180) day period, then the time allowed to cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. 7.3 Remedies. In the event of default by Owner/Developer that is not cured after notice as described in Section 7.2,Owner/Developer shall be deemed to have consented to modification of this Agreement and de-annexation and reversal of the zoning designations described herein, solely against the offending portion of Property and upon City's compliance with all applicable laws, ordinances and rules, including any applicable provisions of Idaho Code §§ 67-6509 and 67-6511. Owner/Developer reserve all rights to contest whether a default has occurred. This Agreement shall be enforceable in the Fourth Judicial District Court in Ada County by either City or Owners and/or Developer, or by any successor or successors in title or by the assigns of the parties hereto_ Enforcement may be sought by an appropriate action at law or in equity to secure the specific performance of the covenants, agreements, conditions,and obligations contained herein. 7.4 Delay. In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either Owner/Developer or City is delayed for causes that are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include,without limitation,acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes,the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay_ 7.5 Waiver. A waiver by City of any default by Owners and/or Developer of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the default and defaults waived and shall neither bar any other rights or remedies of City nor apply to any subsequent default of any such or other covenants and conditions. 8. INSPECTION: Owner/Developer shall, immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the Property as required by this Agreement or by City ordinance or policy,notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other ordinances of the City that apply to said Property. 9. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: City shall record this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, and submit proof of such recording to Owner/Developer,prior to the third reading of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the re-zoning of the Property by the City Council. If for any reason after such recordation, the City Council fails to adopt the ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property contemplated hereby,the City shall execute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement. 10. ZONING: City shall,following recordation of the duly approved Agreement,enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the Property as specified herein. D oPMENT AGRMvffirrr-LuP1NE Cove(142019-0133) PAGE 4 of 7 Page 426 Item#10. it- SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The City may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit,cash deposits,certified check or negotiable bonds,as allowed under the UDC, to insure the installation of required improvements, which the Owner/Developer agree to provide, if required by the City. 12. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed,completed,and accepted by the City, or sufficient surety of performance is provided by Owner/Developer to the City in accordance with Paragraph 11 above, 13. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That Owner/Developer agree to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian unless otherwise provided by this Agreement. 14. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three(3)days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY: with copy to. City Clerk City Attorney City of Meridian City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. 33 E.Broadway Avenue Meridian,Idaho 83642 Meridian,Idaho 83642 OV NER/DEVELOPER: Justin Fishburn 4000 N.McDermott Rd. Meridian,ID 83646 14.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 15. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement,the prevailing party shall be entitled,in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default,termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 16. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term,condition and provision hereof,and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 17. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, DEVELOPMENTAGrtmeERNT—LUPME CovE(H-2019-0133) PAGE 5 of 7 Page 427 Item#10. including City's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the Owner/Developer, each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or portions thereof,except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. City agrees, upon written request of Owner/Developer, to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if City,in its sole and reasonable discretion,had determined that Owner and/or Developer have fully performed their obligations under this Agreement. 1 S_ INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 19. DUTY TO ACT REASONABLY: Unless otherwise expressly provided,each party shall act reasonably in giving any consent,approval,or taking any other action under this Agreement. 20. COOPERATION OF THE PARTIES: In the event of any legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third party (including a governmental entity or official) challenging the validity of any provision in this Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate in defending such action or proceeding. 21. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements,condition and understandings between Owner/Developer and City relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or understanding, either oral or written, express or implied, between Owner/Developer and City, other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided,no subsequent alteration,amendment,change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to City, to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. 21.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing re-zoning of the subject Property herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 22_ EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT:This Agreement shall be effective on the date the Meridian City Council shall adopt the amendment to the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property and execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. [end of text; signatures,acknowledgements,and Exhibits A and B follow] D>vEwpmwT AGREEMENT-LUPINE CovE(H 2O19-0133) PAGE 6 of 7 Page 428 Item#10. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. O LO R: f - Justin Fish urn CITY OF MERIDIAN ATTEST: By: Mayor Robert E. Simison Chris Johnson, City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO ) ss: County of Ada ) On this 11�- day of c)VSf ,2020,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared Justin Fishburn known or identified to me to be the person who signed above and acknowledged to we that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I 4wo4ttruigto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written_ �.•``�ti C0Ar,''�., (SEAL) ' �'•1`�dT�Y'• .1 y'om; p�1BL1C cooNotary Public fo o •. p Residing at: 1 S G� l ''.,�.�' `'••••••• �, My Commission Expires: rE Lp —� STATE OF IDAHO ) :ss County of Ada ) On this 25th day of August , 2020, before one, a Notary Public,personally appeared Robert E.Simison and Chris Johnson,known or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk,respectively,ofthe City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same_ IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written_ Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: Meridian, Idaho Commission expires: 3-28-2022 PAGE 7 of 7 Item#10. EXHIBIT A ��FontrY JqCCiL�e��ss]d�� Sx MGLiff w z i4(�ao�aeiv.�L'sap�cilnx `� o 1602 W.Hays St.,Suite 306 Boise,ID 83702 www.accu ratesu rveyors_oo rn Land Description-Annexation A parcel of land being a portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 33,Township 4 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho being more particularly described as follows. BEGINNING at the found 2-inch aluminum cap monument in asphalt labeled PLS 7729 at the Y4 corner common to Sections 32 and 33 In said township from which the found 3- Y inch brass cap monument in asphalt with illegible labeling at the section corner common to Sections 28,29, 32 and 33 in said township hears N 00'32'36'E~a distance of 2633.71 feet; Thence N 00'32'3b"E along the section line and along the centerline of N. McDermott Road for a distance of 334.34 feet to a found 5/e inch iron pin upon which a 2-inch aluminum cap labeled PL511463 was placed; Thence N 85°03'27"E along the centerline of the McFadden Drain(aka Teeter Drain) for a distance of 751.67 feet to a found 5/8t'inch Iron pin with a plastic cap labeled PL5 13256; Thence 5 19'45'03"E along said centerline and its extension for a distance of 435.77 feet to a found 5/8"inch iron pin upon which a 2-inch aluminum cap labeled PLS 11463 was placed; Thence N 99'17'46"W along the center section fine for a distance of 899.36 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Parcel contains 7_086 acres,more or less. t 114639 1 r7 I q OF%0 �I4 J.av 1602 W.Hays St.,Suite 306 n Boise,ID 83702 r. Phone:208-488-4227 www.accuratesurveyors.com Lupine Cove H-2019-0133 Page 430 Item#10. EXHIBIT A AIVNIV.E'XA TI01V MAR 4000 N. MCDER6dOTT RO. MERIDIAN ID. 83646 LYING W TTH-HN THE SW 1/4 OF THE MW 1/4 OF SECTION W. .4N., R FW,, S.M. 29 28 Alo 2 SECT ON 00RVER LS CP&F Nv. 20t9-0771R5 ILL EGf6Lf ,� 11463 � o Min ,�7•i7•iQ�, Pis �£ 33 ti N 85Y]3'27" E 751.67 13256 OY J. aoP�G SET 2"ALUM. U+ W �(� CAP, PLS 51463 �p 4- �s+ 7 686 Acres w SCALE: 1"=200' a rr% 0-�/4 CORNER Q � SECTION 33 CP&F No, 106023324 32 33 ua9-17'46~w PLS 5467 I1&F ORNER pp�r N 89'T 7'46" W 699.36` SET 2-ALU+M, i738 38• Y " 70 16-12 0634C y�� CAP. PLS 11463 PLS 7729 AG LEQND BOUNDARY LINE SE0770N LANE FOUNO 3 1/2"BRASS CAP HAWS OF SrARIN{'' MONUMENT W ASPHALT N 00'32'36" E SEMEEN FOUND MONUMENTS IT4'0 FOUND 2-ALUM1NUbf CAP AT TN4 7/4 CORNER COMMON TO SE"C7701vS 7 ' MONUMENT W ASPHALT 32 & 33, AND TFIE .SECTION CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 2& 29, 32, & M. �4 FOUND 6/8"IRON AN [+ 1002 W. Hays Street #800 WTFI PLASW CAP, OR AS NO70 i fit} Mee, Idaho 89748 (200) 409-4227 www.aConxateaurveyors.o n1 DATE: JULY, 2019 J06 19-179 Lupine Cove H-2019-0133 Page 431 item#�o. HIBIT B trem#s. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EN AND DECISION& ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Annexation of 7.09 Acres of Land with an R-8 Zoning District; and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 26 Residential Buildable Lots and 6 Common Lots on 7 Acres of Land in the Proposed R-8 Zoning District,by Penelope Constantikes,Riley Planning Services. Case No(s). H-2019-0133 For the City Council Hearing Date of: July 21,2020 (Findings on August 4,2020) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 21, 2020, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 21,2020, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 21, 2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 21,2020, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(LUPINE COVE—H-2019-0133) - I - Page 432 Item#10. Item#8. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 21, 2020, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Annexation and Preliminary Plat is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of July 21, 2020, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 11- 6B-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(LUPINE COVE—H-2019-0133) -2- Page 433 Item#10. Item#8. agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of July 21,2020 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(LUPINE COVE—H-2019-0133) -3- Page 434 Item#10. Item#8. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 4th day of August 2020. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED AYE COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED AYE MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 8-4-2020 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(LUPINE COVE—H-2019-0133) -4- Page 435 Item#10. Item#8. IT A STAFF REPORTC�WEIIDIAN --- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING July 21,2020 Legef '- DATE: � TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Bill Parsons, Current Planning Supervisor 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton,Development Services Manager --- -------� 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2019-0133 Lupine Cove LOCATION: 4000 N. McDermott Rd., in the NW 1/4 of I. Section 33,Township 4N.,Range 1 W. _ I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION NOTE: On April 28, 2020, City Council remanded this project back to Planning and Zoning Commission to provide a recommendation on a revisedpreliminary plat and landscape plan. Staff has updated the staff report in a strike-through and underline format to represent the proposed changes to the plans. Originally, Staff and the Commission had recommended denial based on previous versions of the plans. With the revisions to the plans, Staff is recommending approval of the project. Staffs recommended development agreement provisions and conditions of approval are provided below. Annexation of 7.09 acres of land with an R-8 zoning district and Preliminary Plat consisting of twenty- sixei&(268)buildable lots, sixseven( 7)common lots and two (2) other-lots on 7 acres of land in the proposed R-8 zoning district. Page 1 Page 436 Item#10. Item#8. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 7 acres Future Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential(MDR)(3-8 units/acre) Existing Land Use Residential/agricultural Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family residential(SFR)development Current Zoning RUT in Ada County Proposed Zoning R-8 Lots(#and type;bldg/common) 269 buildable;6�common&2 ethe Phasing plan(#of phases) 1 Number of Residential Units(type 25-7 new and 1 existing(SFR detached homes) of units) Density(gross&net) 3.714 gross/7.46 net Open Space(acres,total [%]/ Based on the applicant's calculations 0.834-of an acre buffer/qualified) (12.0544-7%)is being proposed. Amenities Children's play equipment and gazebo and basketball eatR4 Physical Features(waterways, The Five Mile Creek/McFadden Drain runs along the northern hazards, flood plain,hillside) and eastern boundary of this site. Neighborhood meeting date;#of August 28,2019;9 attendees attendees: History(previous approvals) None B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Yes • Requires ACHD Commission No Action(yes/no) Access(Arterial/Collectors/State One(1)access proposed via N.McDermott Rd.,a collector Hwy/Local)(Existing and Proposed) street Traffic Level of Service Stub Street/Interconnectivity/Cross A stub street was required to the subject property from the Access Aegean Subdivision to the north.The revised plan depicts the extension of the stub street.,Nut the plan as submitted doesn't ..,«o.,,plate extension A4th this deve ,pme + A stub street is proposed at the south boundary. Existing Road Network None Page 2 Page 437 Item#10. Item#8. Fire Service • Distance to Fire Station 3 miles from Fire Station#2 • Fire Response Time 5 minutes under ideal conditions; can meet the response time goals • Resource Reliability 8 1%from Fire Station#2—does meet the target goal of 80%or greater • Risk Identification Risk factor of 2—current resources would not be adequate to supply service to this project(see comments in Section VIILC) • Accessibility Project meets all required access,road widths and turnarounds • Special/resource needs An aerial device is not required;the closest truck company is 12 minutes travel time(under ideal conditions)—Fire Dept. can meet this need in the required timeframe if needed. • Water Supply Requires 1,000 gallons per minute for 1 hour;may be less if buildings are fully sprinklered • Other Resources NA Police Service • Distance to Police 8.5 miles Station • Police Response 5:30 minutes Time • Calls for Service 241 for Reporting District M719(1/l/2019—12/31/2019) • Accessibility No issues with the proposed access • Specialty/resource This proposed development is on the edge of the city limits. The Meridian needs Police Department already serves this area with the Oaks Development and Jump Creek. As of now no additional resources are needed at this time. Once all the surrounding developments build out such as Gander Creek,Aegean Estates and Owyhee High School it will require future additional police resources in this geographic area. • Crimes 241 (1/1/2019—12/31/2019) • Crashes 3 (1/1/2019— 12/31/2019) • Other The Meridian Police Department has no outstanding issues concerning this development application. All qualified open space provided in the development,to include all amenities, must be in an open area in order to allow for natural observation opportunities. Pathways and landscaping should not create hiding spots or blind spots that would promote criminal opportunities. The Meridian Police Department will support all Community Development Staff recommendations,Traffic Impact Studies from ITD and or ACHD to improve access,roadways,intersections,pathways and sidewalks before the project if fully completed. Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Directly adjacent to McDermott Road Services • Sewer Shed North McDermott Trunkshed • Estimated Project See application Sewer ERU's • WRRF Declining 13.81 Balance Page 3 Page 438 Item#10. Item#8. • Project Consistent Yes with WW Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts/Concerns The maximum slope of sewer mainlines is 5.0%due to limitations on our collections televising equipment.Please revise sewer grade between existing SSMH(within McDermott)and the upstream manhole, SSMH Al. Water • Distance to Water 0 feet Services • Pressure Zone 1 • Estimated Project See application Water ERU's • Water Quality Yes-this development results in a long deadend water main which may result Concerns in poor water quality. This deadend won't be eliminated until the Count parcels to the south are developed. • Project Consistent Yes with Water Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns The water mainline in McDermott Road must be extended to the southern property line extended.Water mainline sizes were not indicated on the plans, however the McDermott line must be 12-inch diameter and the Lupine Lane line as shall be 8-inch diameter. Page 4 Page 439 Item#10. Item#8. C. Project Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend Legend ff ff ;r Prvciee--FLuc€afur I Pros: __- _ _ �I F - Mked-H i g —pDerritl, r� r Residentia S�-4, L"J Medium 10ensity sidenfial 61 MU-N ,1 Zoning Map Planned Development Map (fLegendR (�Legend PPL�ec Loc a-c r I F•v'eof Lcocaf 2n R-$ LIT am R-g rR J f RUT Fq I +'+ III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Penelope Constantikes, Riley Planning Services PO Box 405 Boise,ID 83701 B. Owner: Justin Fishburn Page 5 Page 440 Item#10. Item#8. 4000 N. McDermott Rd. Meridian, ID 83646 C. Representative: Same as Applicant IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper notification published in newspaper 5/29/2020 7/3/2020 Radius notification mailed to property owners within 300 feet 5/26/2020 7/l/2020 Public hearing notice sign posted 6/5/2020 7/8/2020 on site Nextdoor posting 5/27/2020 7/l/2020 V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS(Comprehensive Plan) (Note: This project was submitted prior to the new Comprehensive Plan being adopted; therefore, this project is being evaluated under the previous Plan) The Future Land Use Map(FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Medium Density Residential(MDR). The purpose of the MDR designation is to allow small lots for residential purposes within City limits. Uses may include single-family homes at gross densities of 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre. As noted above,the submitted plat consists of 26$building lots on approximately 7 acres of land which is 3.714 dwelling units to the acre. Staff finds the proposed density is within the density parameters of the MDR land use designation. The following Comprehensive Plan Policies are applicable to this development: • "Support a variety of residential categories (low-, medium-, medium-high and high-density single- family, multi-family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities."(3.07.01E) The proposed single-family detached homes will contribute to the variety of residential categories in the City; Staff is unaware how "affordable"the units will be. • "Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is contiguous to the City."(3.01.0117) City services are available and will be extended by the developer to the proposed lots upon development of the site in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. • "Require useable open space be incorporated into new residential subdivision plats."(3.07.02A) The proposed plat depicts a total of 0.83-1 of an acre(or I Z 0514-.7%) of qualified open space. To increase the usability of the open space,staff recommends that the applicant relocate the temporary turnaround proposed on Common Lot 10 on the east side of Lupine Lane., hovevethe o pen space Page 6 Page 441 Item#10. Item#8. • "Require all new development to create a site design compatible with surrounding uses through buffering, screening,transitional densities, and other best site design practices."(3.07.01A) On the south boundary are rural county lots in excess of 4 acres. The applicant has not provided any real transitional lot sizes along this boundary. The two (2)most impacted rural lots have a 5:1 and 3:1 lot ratio respectively. • "Require new urban density subdivision which abut or are proximal to existing low density residential land uses to provide landscaped screening or transitional densities with larger,more comparable lot sizes to buffer the interface between urban level densities and rural residential densities."(3.05.02F) Staff does not believe the transition proposed is adequate to the rural residential lots to the south. Commission should determine if the applicant's revisions to plan provide a transition as desired by the Comprehensive Plan. • "Review new development for appropriate opportunities to connect local roads and collectors to adjacent properties(stub streets)."(3.03.020) A stub street was approved at the north boundary of this property with the Aegean Subdivision preliminary plat which is required to be extended on this property with development. This street wou provides local street access to this development in accord with UDC 11-3A-3. The proposed plat does no depicts a stub street in the location of the stub street approved with the Aegean Subdivision. • "Incorporate creek corridors as an amenity in development design."(5.09.01E) The City's mapping depicts the Five Mile Creek on the north boundary and the McFadden Drain on the east boundary of the development. The submitted plans depicts minimal improvements or enhancements in these areas. Staff believes these areas should be improved as an amenity for the development. Both the Parks Department and NMID are not opposed to a pathway in the easement area, however the City's master pathways plan does not specifically call out one in this area. NMID is amenable to a pathway if the City is willing to amend the master agreement with the district. The Parks Department has indicated a pathway is not desired at this location and one is not required to be constructed with this development. The applicant is proposing to enhance this area with native grasses to preserve as many trees as possible to leave the area undisturbed and natural. This area is designated as common lots so the maintenance of the area is the responsibility of the HOA. Staff is supportive of this area remaining in a natural state however, the applicant should construct an internal pathway network through the internal common lots internal to the development that ties in the creek area for residents use as a recreational amenity (see analysis below for more information). • "Develop and implement programs to encourage and promote tree health and preservation throughout the City, including along waterways and within proposed development."(5.01.01E) The subject property contains many mature trees that will be retained or removed with development of the subdivision. The previous landscape plan indicates that 1,958 caliper inches of mature trees exist on the site. Many of them will be removed for various reasons. the:1,95-9 m*,.;n d oft Me site. If The plat were has been designed with less density,so sta ff believes more of the existing mature trees can eou be preserved with the development. The applicant is indicated that the landscape plan will be updated with a new mitigation plan prior to the City Council hearing. Page 7 Page 442 Item#10. Item#8. Staff believes the 19rapase revised development plan is generallyconsistent with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan in regards to land use, open space, connectivity and density; however,be.-use thT plat still lacks transitional lots sizes on the south boundary. VI. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ANALYSIS A. ANNEXATION&ZONING The Applicant requests annexation of 7.09 acres of land,which includes land to the section line of N. McDermott Rd.,with an R-8 zoning district consistent with the Medium Density Residential(MDR) Future Land Use Map (FLUM)designation in the Comprehensive Plan. The legal description and exhibit map for the area proposed to be annexed is included in Section VIII.A below. Proposed Use: The Applicant proposes to develop the site with 25-7 new single-family detached homes;the existing home is proposed to remain on a lot in the proposed subdivision. Single-family detached dwellings are listed as a principal permitted use in the R-8 zoning district per UDC Table 11-2A-2. The proposed annexation area is contiguous to City annexed property and is within the Area of City Impact Boundary. A legal description and exhibit map for the annexation area is included in Section VII.A.A development agreement is not being recommended as part of the annexation request beeause staff is r-eeommending denial. B. PRELIMINARY PLAT The proposed preliminary plat consists of 269 buildable lots (include the lot where the existing home is proposed to remain) and 6-7-common lots a-ad 2 athe,-!a on 7 acres of land in the proposed R-8 zoning district. Lots range in size from 4,353-500 to 13,92412,674 square feet(s.f.). The plat is proposed to develop in one phase. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There is one (1) existing home and some accessory structures on this site;the existing home is proposed to remain on Lot 11-3,Block 2—all accessory structures that don't comply with the setbacks of the district are required to be removed prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. If the annexation and subdivision is approved,the existing residence should connect to City services and obtain a new address with development of the property. Dimensional Standards: Compliance with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 for the R-8 district is required. The minimum property size in the R-8 district is 4,000 square feet with a minimum street frontage of 40 feet. All of the lots conform the dimensional standards in UDC Table 11-2A-6. Access(UDC 11-3A-3): One access is proposed via N. McDermott Rd., a collector street; local street access is not available to this property at this time,however a local stub street was planned from the Aegean Subdivision to the north. The applicant is not proposing the extension of the roadway for interconnectivity between the two developments in accord with the Plan and UDC. due to the eest asseeiated with er-essing ever-the Five Mile Gr-eek for-the extension of the roadway. AC14D did not require half the eest of the er-essing fFe the developer-of the Aegean pr-ejeet. Therefore,the er-essing half the eestwould be absorbed by the sttbj eet developer-with long term maintena-nee by AGHD. ACHD is r-equiring the&iteasiea of the r-oa eensistent with their-pokey. Staff believes these two pr-ejeets shetild be eenneeted with a publie stfeet eenneetion. Page 8 Page 443 Item#10. Item#8. UPC 11 3A 3 r-equifes aeeess to Weal streets when available a-ad the Compr-ehefisive Plan F-e i intereonneetivity and the ex4ension of stub streets with development. The stub street t flqeqn-,-�Ahisn shown on the proposed plat which is not eonsistent with the UDC or the Plan. The local street being proposed(Lupine Lane) does stub at the south boundary. This street does not meet the naming convention of the City and"Lane" should be removed from the street name as this nomenclature is reserved for private streets,not public streets. The street does exceed 150 feet, therefore a temporary turnaround is required.The applicant is proposing to construct a temporary turnaround on a common lot(Lot 10,Block 2),which decreases the usability of the area. Staff recommends that the applicant construct the temporary turnaround on Lots 13 and 14 in the southeast corner of the development to increase the open space for development. The reason for this recommendation is to ensure open space for the development remains intact without placing a burden on the HOA to remediate the removal of the turnaround area. In discussions with ACHD,this would not violate any of their policies. In addition to the stub stfeet not being exteaded, appr-o*ima4ely half of the fesideatial lots take aeeess responsibility of the HOA. Further,Publie Wor-ks DepaFtment is being less suppeftiVe Of COFMHOR dr-i,veways beeause of the separation r-equir-emepAs between the ser-viees. They alse oppose the extensio of any mains (watef or-sewer-) in said dr-iveways as euffeody pFoposed by the applieaf4. streets to improve vehieular network. Staff finds exeluding the extension of the stub street and the .. the UDC Pathways(UDC 11-3A-8): There are no pathways depicted on the Pathways Master Plan for this property. As noted above,the applicant is making an attempt to incorporate the irrigation facilities into the boundary of the plat. This area will remain a natural waterway that will be maintained by the future HOA. Staff believes the applicant could enhance this development if an internal pedestrian network were provided in the development. Staff recommends that the applicant include a 5-foot wide pathway within the following common lots-Lot 5 and Lot 10 AND provide another micropath lot at south boundary of Lot 14 in the SEC of the development.Further,the 5-foot wide pathway in Lot 10 should stub to southern property boundary for pedestrian connectivity when the property to the south re-develops. , O. 1"1Tl('' 1 1 3 A 4 � T 1DG 1 1 ��vv'z crr-vvc�T�z-r-o--di� �v�rr Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-17): A 5-foot wide detached sidewalk is required along the frontage of this site adjacent to N.McDermott Rd. The proposed pla4 depiets the 5 feet wide sidewalk outside of the r-equiFed landseape btiMr-adjaeent to MeDefme#Read. The applieapA should r-eloeate the sidewalk in the 35 feet wide landseape buff-er-to ensmfe eomplianee with the TPC-The plat as submitted complies with this requirement of the UDC. Landscaping(UDC I1-3B): A 35-foot wide street buffer is required along N. McDermott Rd. (measured from back of curb), landscaped per the standards in UDC Table 11-313-7C. The proposed landscape plan depicts the buffer in a common lot as required by the UDC and landscaped in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C. Landscaping is required in common open space areas in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G- 3E. Trees are proposed far exceeding UDC standards. Tree mitigation is required in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-I0C.As noted above, the property contains many mature trees that are proposed to be removed or retained as part of Page 9 Page 444 Item#10. Item#8. the project(approximately 1,958 caliper inches).With the redesign of the plat,the applicant intends to retain more of the mature trees on the site as desired by the City. However,the revised landscape plan does not depict the number of caliper inches that may be retained as part of the development. The applicant has informed staff that it is their desire to update the plan with the mitigation plan prior to the City Council hearing. Staff is amenable to this request and recommends that 10 days prior to City Council hearing,the applicant should provide a revised landscape plan that includes the caliper inches that are to be retained and removed as part of the development. Further,this should be form of existing trees and mitigate 184 caliper inches. The remaining 1,320 caliper inches are being mitigated.UDC 11 3B 10C.5(a) requires 0 1/6 replacement of the caliper inches. T mitigation plan as proposed by the applieant depiets mitigation of 484 ealipeF inehes whieh does not comply with UDC standards. The applicant should coordinated with the City Arborist on the mitigation p to ensure the development can accommodate as many caliper inches as possible. Qualified Open Space& Site Amenities (UDC 11-3G): Because the area of the preliminary plat is approximately 7 acres in size,the qualified open space and site amenity standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3 apply. The applicant is proposing to approximately 0.83 of an acre of qualified open space in accord with UDC standards.However, as noted above, staff has concerns with the temporary turnaround on Common Lot 10. If the temporary turnaround encumbered buildable lots as recommended above,there would be more useable open space provided within the development. Further, staff is recommending that the applicant provide an additional amenity in the form of an internal walking path system to integrate the irrigation facilities into the proposed development(see pathway analysis above).With the relocation of the turnaround and the inclusion of the internal walking paths, staff is supportive of the open space and amenities proposed for the development. The applicant has also indicated that a tot lot is proposed on Common Lot 10 however,the revised plan does not provide any details of this amenity. During the public hearing the applicant should clarify if a tot lot is proposed for this development.If one is proposed,the applicant should revise the landscape plan to include details of this amenity. to show how she der-ived at the "alified open spaee for-the development. in Feviewing the submitted plan, some of the aFeas,the appheant is eounting towar-ds qualified open spaee does not meet UDC standards as fellaws� 1. Lot 7,Week 2 is notz'andseaped in aeeor-dith UPC 11-3 B 1-2- r-emaval of imper4wis siir-faee, this afea does not fneet the Gity's open spaee standards. r-emoved ffem the open spaee ealettlations. if this area is not dimensioned 50' x 100' with the ,;of the eammen lot and Elees not meet U standa-rds in aeEO Yth UDG 11 36- 27 .7 and 8. in aeeer-dwith City and the 4+iga4ion standards and integr-a4ed in the subdivision design as envisioned by the Gompfehensive Plan,the appheant eotild ineltide this lot in the Open spaee ealettlations. Without this let, staff finds that the qttalified open spaee pfoposed with this pr-ej does Diet eemply with the staiidafds Set 4;»4l. i UPC; 11 3G 3. Page 10 Page 445 Item#10. Item#8. ems. Waterways(UDC 11-3A-6): The Five Mile Creek/Mcfadden Drain runs along the northern and eastern perimeter of the property. The applicant is seeking Council waiver to allow the irrigation facilities remain open. This area will be contained in common lot to be owned and maintained by a future HOA. Further,the applicant is proposing to hydroseed this area with native drought tolerant fescue to enhance the area. Although it will not be improved with a pathway, staff finds that the proposed vegetation and retention of existingtrees rees will complement the development and may provide passive open space to be used by future residents who are fond of wildlife viewing. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing constructed on the site is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6 and 11-3A-7. The master fence plan complies with UDC standards. The landseape plan stibmit4ed with the appheation details the feneing proposed fef the pr-ojeet. Six foe At-qiqlid f�neing as proposed by the applieaftt. The feneing along the entire north boundary of the buildable lots,ineluding Lot 14 and 15,Bloek 1,must be eonstrueted as a 6 foot tall semi privaey fenee as Six feet tall semi pfivaey feneing is pfoposed along the if4efaal een*nen lots a-ad the aoi4hefiq batfndaf:� Utilities (UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is proposed in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. Street lighting is required to be installed in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. See Section VIRB below for Public Works comments/conditions. Pressurized Irrigation System (UDC 11-3A-15): An underground pressurized irrigation(PI) system is required to be provided for each lot within the development as set forth as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. If a PI pump station is required on the developed property, such station shall be on a lot solely dedicated to that pump station and shall be owned by the entity that owns and maintains the PI system as set forth in UDC 11-313-6E. Storm Drainage(UDC 11-3A-18 : An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. Storm drainage will be mitigated with private drainage ponds at the end of the proposed common driveways and public street drainage is proposed to accommodate in common Lots 2 and 13,Block 1. Because ACHD drainage ponds are proposed within common lots,the proposed ponds must be designed in accord with UDC 11-3B-I I or removed from the open space calculations. Building Elevations: Conceptual building elevation photos were submitted for the proposed homes, as shown in Section VII.E. Building materials are proposed to consist of a mix of stucco,wood, and stone wainscot. Field and trim materials are distinguished by color and texture;window and door openings are accentuated with trim. Page 11 Page 446 Item#10. Item#8. Because the rear and/or side of 2-story structures on lots that abut N.McDermott Rd.will be highly visible, Staff recommends those elevations incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections, recesses,step-backs,pop-outs),bays, banding,porches,balconies, material types,or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines.Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. VIL DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approvals of the proposed Annexation and Preliminary Plat in accord with the Findings in Section IX. B. The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission heard these items on June 18, 2020. At the public hearing,the Commission voted to recommend approval of the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Penelope Constantikes and Derritt Kerner b. In opposition:None c. Commenting. None d. Written testimony: Sue Wag e. Staff presenting application: Bill Parsons f. Other Staff commenting on qpplication: Adrienne WeatherlX 2. Key issue(s) public testimony a. Will the proposed development affect the wells and water quality of the Apple Valley residents. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. Lot transition on the south boundary b. Coordination with NMID on allowing the walking path connections to the Five Creek/ McFadden Drain easement area C. Relocation of the temporary turnaround on lots 13 and 14 d. Future extension of the stub street on the south boundary 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Struck condition 2e and 3c requiring the relocation of the temporary turnaround on buildiable lots on the east side of Lupine Lane b. Modify condition of approval 2b.requiring the pathway connections to the irrigation facilities if allowed by the NMID 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: A. Applicant is seeking Council waiver to keep the waterways (Five Mile Creek/ McFadden Drain) open in accord with UDC 11-3A-6. C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on July 21,2020. At the public hearing,the Council moved to approve the subject AZ and PP requests. I. Summary of the City Council public hearing a. In favor: Penelope Constantikes b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Gennie Fishburn d. Written testimony:None e. Staff presenting application: Bill Parsons £ Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None Page 12 Page 447 Item#10. Item#8. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Fencing along the open waterwav(sl. b. Landscaping proposed in the NMID easement area. C. Methods for restricting access from residents recreating in the NMID easement area. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. Council granted the waiver to allow the Five Mile Creek/McFadden Drain to remain an open waterway in accord with UDC 11-3A-6. Page 13 Page 448 Item#10. Item#8. VIII. EXHIBITS A. Annexation&Zoning Legal Description and Exhibit Map w 1602 W.Hays St.,Suite 306 p Bake,ID 83702 f s o www.accu ratesu rveyors_o®rn Land Description-Annexation A parcel of land being a portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 33,Township 4 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the found 2-inch aluminum cap monument in asphalt labeled PLS 7729 at the Y.corner common to Sections 32 and 33 In said township from which the found 3- %inch brass cap monument in asphalt with illegible labeling at the section corner common to Sections 28,29,32 and 33 in said township bears N 00'32'36'E a distance of 2633.71 feet, Thence N 00'32'36"E along the section line and along the centerline of N. McDermott Road for a distance of 334.34 feet to a found 5/811 inch iron pin upon which a 2-inch aluminum cap labeled PLS 11463 was placed; Thence N 85"03'27"E along the centerline of the McFadden Drain(aka Teeter Drain) for a distance of 751.67 feet to a found 5/811 inch Iron pin with a plastic cap labeled PL5 13256; Thence S 19"45'03"€along said:centerline and its extension for a distance of 435.77 feet to a found 5/811 inch iron pin upon which a 2-inch aluminum cap labeled PLS 11463 was placed; Thence N 89'17'46"W along the center section line for a distance of 899.36 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Parcel contains 7.086 acres,more or less. t 114639 ' - r7 I .0 or VA �r+u J.v� 1602 W.Hays St.,Suite 306 n Boise,ID 83702^ Phone:208-488-4227 www.accuratesurveyors.com Page 14 Page 449 Item#10. Item#8. AIV1V ' A TIO-N- MAP 4000 N. VCDE1?MOTT RD. MEFd00N 10, 83646 L v7NG M T H.'N FxiF .5w x/4 of TTg1< N w x/4 oF- sEC 7 ON 33, T.4N— R.t , B.M. 2 9 2$ 33 S R'EC770V CORNE GPAF Na. 2019--01?785 Ljj ILLER&C � 11463 PLS p 75 1.6 7' � 4 Lw AP, PLS ;7463 h�j e}• G� i3'y .�' 7 086 Acres SCALE: 1"�Zfla' r'7 7—�14 CORNER SECUON 33 CP&F Na x06023324 32 33 Jd8.477'4& PLS 546f 114 Ccrin'C.;l f'%r . N 69'17'46" W 899.36' SET 2"ALU; 173�36' CP&F Na 2016-120634CfyH/ CAP, PLS 11¢63 PLS 7729 O LEGEND OWNUARY LWE SEC?70hf LINE 9"S OF' REARING 4CC"4AM& FOUND J 12' BRASS CAP MMUM W A WALT N Ot7J2'36' E BETWEEN FOUND MONUMENI-9 iL ♦ s FOUND 2' ALUMINUM CAP AT THE 1/4 CORNER COM44ON TO SEC770Ns MONUMENT OV ASPHALT J2 & 3T SECAND ON $8, 29, 32, &R w � ceur�alu ry secTx�aNs ��, �s, 3� � 3J. I. • FQUAV 5A"IRON PIN, TA. Y$0� W. klay� Street #54B 3i9TF{ PLASTIC CAP, OR AS NOTEDt c3 Boise, Idaho 83?02 # (208) 480-4227 www.accurate aurveyors.com DATE: JULY, 2019 Jog 19-7�e Page 15 Page 450 Item#10. Item#8. B. Preliminary Plat(date: 1 inn 05/14/2020) PRELNRkWYFLATFOR LUPINF, COVF, SU13DIVISION LYRIGINA PORUON OFTRR Sw L'4 OF THE NW 1W OF SECTION 33, FF T,4N,R,1 W.,D.M.NERID AN,AM COUNTY,IDAHO ' 2020 N � rsalscr errs II .{# 77 ' 1T®iR9NAP �y'E�� 1-00 rwm.,s i .dam LMI , . z Page 16 Page 451 Item#10. Item#8. C. Landscape Plan(date: 10,116,12019 nci 0 07/13/2020) ! i LAIJ�5LAPE REQIIIREMEIJ�S: IANp,SfAPE N41E5: Ea mwmi.vamrmwwim�o®�w m �s n.C' � a �_ _ '� _. OR®0➢® • -.rn.r. --M__� P—ECFfWERYIEW-� •�•••wo�� .ir w.wer�m�r�.sr m IQ jy LJ 0 O O p0 � Q�� gp O O Z �T� PL4M OVEIlVIEWB i ACPGAl10N !+ ® �L100 Page 17 Page 452 Item#10. Item#8. ✓! PYNAT SGFIEp1LE REFERENGENGTES SGHE MULE PEA@®A➢6 = � ni"n..r •moo.-. S � e n umwxon acv.. � a � m LD Rl- % i ❑ •Ll1PWEdANE�PpEyATEI //""""�� ! 1 '�,JLEN � F O - ❑ OED ram__ uNnmrtaE w , 1 _ i� rrur Eou 6 �` `— ��...anuaellai-nPTraff Pluml�•�••p�� Z sxwePlMmNc � �• .1 `.may .�."....".,..,...�...."p..r.m ,..mb.+.,. r� - 9 FEErWlE1GF?CLOSEGVCAdJFHYCE �,r4�.SEMIFRNATEFENGESFEEFINHEICM O ! W Z I x� F� uunscAaE 5 —ESOAMENHY:REFEREN—MAGE ..... i Page 18 Page 453 Item#10. Item#8. D. Conceptual Building Elevation Photos `� Errr ru. ■■n was r Page 19 Page 454 Item#10. Item#8. rr 6:...- k Page 20 Page 455 Item#10. Item#8. IX. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS (ern CONDITIONS S OF APPROVAL DUE TO STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION OF DENL4b) A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. A Development Agreement(DA,) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s)at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid b_ the he Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council rig the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat, landscape plan and conceptual building elevations for the single-family dwellings included in Section VIII and the provisions contained herein. b. The rear and/or sides of 2-story structures on Lots 2-4,Block 1 and Lots 2,Block 2 that face N. McDermott Road shall incorporate articulation throughges in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g. projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs), bays,banding,porches,balconies,material tykes,or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines. Sin lg e-story structures are exempt from this requirement. 2. The preliminary plat included in Section VII.B, dated 05/14/2020, shall be revised as follows: a. Add a note to the final plat that prohibits direct lot access to N. McDermott Road. b. Add a micropath lot on the south boundary of Lot 14,Block 1 in the SEC of the development in accord with UDC 11-3A-8 and 11-3B-12, if allowed by NMID. c. The internal streets proposed within the development shall comply with the street naming standards in Title 8. d. The existing residence on Lot 13,Block 2 shall connect to City services and obtain a new address with development of the property. e. The tempor-ary tufnar-ound on Common Lot 10 shall be r-elpeated an the east side of Lgpine Lane and efieti—er-buildable lots. 3. The landscape plan included in Section VILC, dated 054 -0 07/13/2020, shall be revised A) as follows: a. The applicant shall coordinate with the City Arborist on the tree mitigation plan to ensure the development can accommodate as many caliper inches as possible. b. The applicant shall construct a 5 feet wide pqthwqy-�n Common Lots 5 and 10 AND preyle anothff micropath lot at south boundary of Lot 14 in the SEC of the development, if allowed by NMID. Page 21 Page 456 Item#10. Item#8. e. The tempofaf-�t-timar-ound area on Common Lot 10 shall be landscaped iff aeeor-d with UPC-44- ,7 Dufifig t e „bl: b,o.,fi the , 1:,af4 shall elafify if a tot lot: pfoposedd f this devel 4. Future development shall be consistent with the R-8 dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A- 6. 5. Off-street parkin is s required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family detached dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 6. Applicant shall construct homes consistent with the homes elevation in Exhibit VII(D). 7. Developer shall comply with all ACHD conditions of approval. 8. The Applicant shall have a maximum of two (2)years to obtain City Engineer's signature on a final plat in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 9. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions does not relieve the applicant of responsibility for compliance. 10. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lag adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. rn7rr�rrrc aimlicant is seekinL,Ci ounciln=waiver cozleave the a o The City Council approved the Five Mile Creek and McFadden Drain to remain open - B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Condition of Approval 1.1 The applicant shall be required to pay the Oaks Lift Station and Pressure Sewer Reimbursement Fees in the amount of$265.25 per building lot. The aggregate amount of the reimbursement fees for the entire preliminary_plat area must be paid with the first final plat application. 1.2 The applicant shall be required to pay the Oaks Lift Station Pump Upgrades Reimbursement Fees in the amount of$185.43 per building lot. The aggregate amount of the reimbursement fees for the entire preliminary_plat area must be paid with the first final plat application. 1.3 As designed,the water mainline will be a long dead-end main,which may result in poor water quality. This dead-end situation won't be eliminated until the parcels to the south are developed. 1.4 The water mainline in McDermott Road must be extended to the southern grope • line extended. Water mainline sizes were not indicated on the preliminary development plans, however the McDermott mainline must be 12-inch diameter and the Lupine Lane mainline shall be 8-inch diameter. Page 22 Page 457 Item#10. Item#8. 1.5 The maximum slope of sewer mainlines is 5.0%due to limitations on our collections televising equipment. Please revise sewer grade between existing SSMH(within McDermott)and the upstream manhole, SSMH Al. 1.6 The geotechnical investigative report prepared by SITE Consulting,LLC indicates some very specific construction considerations. The applicant shall be responsible for the adherence of these recommendations to help ensure that groundwater does not become a problem within crawlspaces of homes, and that storm drainage systems function properly. Applicant shall be required to submit updated groundwater monitoring data and any new geotechnical investigative information that has been derived since the initial investigation efforts of April 20,2019. 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way_(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a singlety,or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x 11"map with bearings and distances(marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.3 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 12-13-8.3,). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receivingdevelopment plan approval. 2.4 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.5 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.6 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used Page 23 Page 458 Item#10. Item#8. for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitneat208)334-2190. 2.7 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections 208)375-5211. 2.8 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits. 2.9 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing,landscaping amenities etc prior to signature on the final plat. 2.10 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures.Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner maypost a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineergnature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-313. 2.11 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.12 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply_ with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.13 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that ma.. b�quired by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.14 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.15 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-31-l. 2.16 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.17 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.18 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage fg acility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.19 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. Page 24 Page 459 Item#10. Item#8. 2.20 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting.Acopy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancit .00rg/public_works.aspx?id=272. 2.21 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety, in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridianci(E.orglWebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=181295&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianCiV D. POLICE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=182011&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity E. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT(NMID) https://weblink.meridianciby.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=182431&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity F. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT(CDHD) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=181358&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity G. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) https://weblink.meridiancioy.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=181368&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianCiby&cr =1 H. WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT(WASD) https://weblink.meridianciby.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=183096&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCitE I. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) hyps://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=183480&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCitX X. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: Page 25 Page 460 Item#10. Item#8. 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Council finds the proposed development is consistent with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan in regards to land use, open space, transportation and density however, the plat lacks transitional lots sizes on the south boundary. (See section V. above for more information.) 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Council finds the proposed map amendment and development complies with the purpose statements of the residential districts in that it will contribute to the range of housing opportunities for the community consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health,safety, and welfare; The Council finds the proposed map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare as the proposed residential uses should be compatible with adjacent existing and future residential uses in the area, if transitional lot sizes are provided along the south boundary. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The Council finds City services are available to be provided to this development. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The Council finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City as the proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and UDC standards. B. Preliminary Plat(UDC 11-613-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision making body shall make the following findings: (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; (Ord.08-1372, 7-8-2008, eff. 7-8-2008) The Council finds the proposed plat is generally in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and UDC if the Applicant complies with the conditions of approval in Section VIII. 2. Public services are available or can be made available ad are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Council finds public services can be made available to the subject property and will be adequate to accommodate the proposed development. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; The Council finds the proposed plat is in substantial conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's CIP. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. Page 26 Page 461 Item#10. Item#8. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health,safety or general welfare; and The Council finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The Council finds there are natural features (Five Mile Creek and McFadden Drain) that need to be preserved and enhanced as part of the development. Page 27 Page 462 Item#11. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Parks and Recreation Department: Pedestrian Bridge Construction Agreement Between Open Door Rentals and the City of Meridian to Connect Pathway Segments and Traverse Ten Mile Creek Page 463 Item#11. C� fIEN , IN4, IDAHG-. MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Approve Topic on the City Council Consent Agenda From: Kim Warren, Parks and Recreation Meeting Date: August 25, 2020 Presenter: Kim Warren Estimated Time: Consent Agenda Topic: Parks and Recreation Department: Pedestrian Bridge Construction Agreement Between Open Door Rentals and the City of Meridian to Connect Pathway Segments and Traverse Ten Mile Creek Recommended Council Action: As pathways project manager, I respectfully request that Council approve this Bridge Acceptance agreement for the purpose of establishing a pedestrian connection over Ten Mile Creek. This project will facilitate student access to Peregrine Elementary School from the new Twelve Oaks Villas project and enhance connectivity for the pathway system in this area. Background: This bridge crossing is planned across Ten Mile Creek southwest of Linder and Franklin Roads. The original Development Agreement for Twelve Oaks Villas, executed on October 27, 2006, required the developer to provide a pedestrian connection across Ten Mile Creek. Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District will only allow the bridge crossing if the City will own and maintain the bridge in perpetuity, per the terms of our December 19, 2000 Master Pathways Agreement. Therefore, in order for the developer to carry out this provision of the Development Agreement, the City has completed the following: • Secured an easement on the south side of the proposed pedestrian bridge from Whitestone HOA (already approved and recorded) • Made arrangements to remove encroachments on the existing common lot at the bridge landing • Secured an estimate of$4,750.00 to construct an 'outflow' pathway segment so this bridge can make a valid pedestrian connection. • Included cost to construct this short pathway segment in our pathways budget request for FY 2021.Also include in our FY21 budget is the cost to build 150 +/- ft. of open vision yard fencing- estimated cost not to exceed $4,000.00. • Worked with Legal to develop the attached Bridge Acceptance Agreement so that the bridge, once installed,will meet established standards for public safety and minimize the impacts of long-term maintenance. In short, this agreement guarantees that the City is provided with a quality structure that will last. Page 464 Item#11. The developer has satisfied all other terms required by Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District. The City's formal acceptance of this pedestrian bridge will enable the processing of License Agreements and other permissions required for this project to move forward. This bridge will be an asset to the pathway system at large and make possible a Safe Route to School for any elementary school children living north of Ten Mile Creek. Page 465 Item#11. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT This PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), is made and entered into this If day of A'' , 2020 by and between Open Door Rentals LLC ("Developer") and the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("City") (collectively, "Parties"). WHEREAS, via development agreement between the City of Meridian and Franklin Centre, LLC executed on October 27, 2006 and recorded with the Ada County Recorder as instrument no. 106180812 ("DA"), conditions of development of the property located at 1961 W. Franklin Road, Meridian, Idaho, Ada County parcel no. R8580480020 ("Property") include installation of a multi-use pathway segment connecting the pathway at Property and the pathway at Whitestone Estates, to include a pedestrian bridge traversing Ten Mile Creek ("Bridge"), at the location depicted in Exhibit A; WHEREAS, Developer is Franklin Centre, LLC's successor in interest, and, being bound by the terms of the DA, seeks to develop the Property in accordance therewith; WHEREAS, City has obtained from Whitestone Homeowners Association an easement for the pathway abutting the south side of the Bridge, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, and Developer has reserved to City an easement for the pathway abutting the north side of the Bridge, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit C; and WHEREAS,by this Agreement City wishes to engage Developer, as an independent contractor, to construct and install the Bridge on City's behalf, and in consideration of the fulfillment of Developer's commitments under the DA, Developer wishes to be so engaged; NOW, THEREFORE,for and in consideration of the covenants, agreements and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties mutually agree as follows: I.DEVELOPER'S OBLIGATIONS A. Developer has provided to City a plan for design of the Bridge, as set forth in Exhibit D hereto, and City has approved such design. B. Developer shall, at Developer's sole expense, obtain all necessary building permits, plan reviews, and inspections from the Meridian Community Development Department, Division of Building Services ("Building Services") as may be necessary to construct the Bridge, and shall fulfill all requirements of Building Services and of all applicable codes and laws. C. Developer shall, at Developer's sole expense, negotiate and enter into a license agreement with the Nampa &Meridian Irrigation District allowing Developer to construct the Bridge within the District's easement, at the location depicted in Exhibit A. Developer shall provide a copy of such license agreement to City. BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT PAGE I� Page 466 Item#11. D. Developer shall, at Developer's sole expense, at the location set forth in Exhibit.A, construct the Bridge in accordance with the plans attached hereto as Exhibit D, with any and all modifications as may be required by Building Services. E. Developer shall notify City, in writing, of Developer's Final Completion of Bridge construction, which completion shall be signified by: 1. Completed construction and installation of the Bridge, in accordance with the plans attached hereto as Exhibit D, at the location set forth in Exhibit A. 2. Final inspection and approval of the Bridge by Building Services. 3. Developer's submission to City Contact of copies of full releases and waivers of lien from any and all subcontractors and/or suppliers involved with the construction of the Bridge. II. CITY'S OBLIGATIONS A. Pursuant to the December 19, 2000 Master Pathway Agreement for Developing and Maintaining Pathways between City and the Nampa &Meridian Irrigation District ("Master Pathways Agreement"), City shall obtain from the Nampa &Meridian Irrigation District a license agreement allowing City to operate and maintain the Bridge during and after its construction. B. Pursuant to the Master Pathways Agreement, City shall obtain from the Nampa&Meridian Irrigation District a license agreement allowing City to operate and maintain the pathway abutting the north side of the Bridge. C. Following Developer's fulfillment of all aspects of Final Completion as set forth in section I.E., above, City shall execute Final Acceptance of the Bridge, which shall be signified by adoption of a resolution indicating Meridian City Council's acceptance of the delivery of the Bridge as constructed. D. Upon Final Acceptance of the Bridge as set forth in section II.B., above, City shall assume responsibility for operation, maintenance, and repair of the Bridge. Iy.GENERAL PROVISIONS. A. Day-to-day contacts.The following persons shall serve as the primary contact persons for Developer and City, respectively, for all day-to-day matters regarding design, construction, Final Completion, and Final Acceptance of the Bridge. Communication between City Contact and Developer Contact shall occur via e-mail or telephone. Developer Contact: City Contact: JLJ, Inc (Jim Jewett, Project Manager) Mike Barton me @ mauijim.realtor mbarton@meridiancity.org (208) 794-0070 208-884-5533 BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT PAGE page 467 Item#11. B. Notice. All other notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when personally served, or mailed in the United States mail, addressed as follows: Developer: City: Open Door Rentals, LLC Meridian City Clerk 1977 E. Overland Road 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 Meridian ID 83642 C. Liability insurance. Developer shall maintain, and specifically agrees that Developer will maintain throughout the term of this Agreement, liability insurance, in which City shall be named an additional insured in the minimum amount as specified in the Idaho Tort Claims Act set forth in Title 6, Chapter 9 of the Idaho Code. The limits of insurance shall not be deemed a limitation of the covenants to indemnify and save and hold harmless City; and if City becomes liable for an amount in excess of the insurance limits herein provided, Developer covenants and agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmless City from and for all such losses, claims, actions, or judgments for damages or liability to persons or property. Developer shall provide City with a certificate of insurance or other proof of insurance evidencing Developer's compliance with the requirements of this paragraph. In the event the insurance minimums are changed, Developer shall immediately submit proof of compliance with the changed limits. D. Indemnification. Developer specifically indemnifies City and holds City harmless from any loss, liability, claim,judgment, or action for damages or injury to Developer, to Developer's personal property or equipment, and/or to Developer's employees, agents, guests or invitees arising out of or resulting from any condition or circumstance not caused by or arising out of the tortious conduct of City or its employees. Developer further agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any loss, liability, claim or action from damages or injuries to persons or property in any way arising out of or resulting from this Agreement or any activities related thereto and not caused by or arising out of the tortious conduct of City or its employees. If any claim, suit or action is filed against City for any loss or claim described in this paragraph, Developer, at City's option, shall defend City and assume all costs, including attorney's fees, associated with the defense or resolution thereof, or indemnify City for all such costs and fees incurred by City in the defense or resolution thereof. Developer acknowledges that activities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement carry risks, some of which are unknown, and accepts any and all such risks. E. Compliance with laws. In performing the scope of services required hereunder, Developer shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments. F. Assignment. Neither party shall assign or sublet all or any portion of its respective interest in this Agreement or any privilege or right hereunder, either voluntarily or involuntarily, without the prior written consent of the other party. This Agreement and each and all of the terms and conditions hereof shall apply to and are binding upon the respective organizations, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Parties. BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT PAGE Page 468 Item#11. G. No agency. For purposes of or in furtherance of this Agreement, neither party nor its respective employees, agents, contractors, officials, officers, servants, guests, and/or invitees shall be considered agents of the other in any manner or for any purpose whatsoever. H. Attorney fees. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. I. Time of the essence. The parties shall fulfill obligations described in this Agreement in a timely manner, as set forth herein. The parties acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to this Agreement, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a default of this Agreement. J. Termination. 1. Grounds. Grounds for termination of this Agreement shall include, but shall not be limited to: an act or omission by either party which materially breaches any term of this Agreement; an act of nature or other unforeseeable event which precludes or makes impossible the performance of the terms of this Agreement by either party; or a change in or occurrence of circumstances that renders the performance by either party a detriment to the public health, safety, or welfare. 2. Process. Either party may terminate this Agreement by providing thirty (30) days' notice of intention to terminate. Such notice shall include a description of the breach or circumstances providing grounds for termination. A fourteen (14) day cure period shall commence upon provision of the notice of intention to terminate. If, upon the expiration of such cure period, cure of the breach or circumstances providing grounds for termination has not occurred, this Agreement may be terminated upon mailing of notice of termination. K. Construction and severability. If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. L. Non-waiver. Failure of either party to promptly enforce the strict performance of any term of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver or relinquishment of any party's right to thereafter enforce such term, and any right or remedy hereunder may be asserted at any time after the governing body of either party becomes entitled to the benefit thereof, notwithstanding delay in enforcement. M. Approval required. This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the respective governing bodies of both Parties. The parties signatory hereto represent BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT PAGE Page 469 Item#11. and warrant that each is duly authorized to bind, respectively, City and Developer to this Agreement in all respects. N. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties shall cause this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers to be effective as of the day and year first above written. DEVELOPER: si Corey D. Barton,-Member Open Door Rentals LLC CITY OF MERIDIAN: Attest: BY: Robert E. Simison, Mayor Chris Johnson, City Clerk BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT PAGE Page 470 Item#11. EXHIBIT A too kg� 1 f G I --- -AW NO olwl tj vy Ilk 4.1 QR ww— LAJ LD Ov , i r 44 � l O m 4! > U ai L� s w,3" C f ��,1, ��I I �• a �.*,x h• 3c + N-m 71 I AR ';' 1 �� .✓} ��l i � �� '•BSI � �� I +�,� ✓t � � J/ � it 1 1 7�.- F I� `1 1 �•��.� �t 'iI _�r1—J 1—.—'� � r' '-' „—� �`� I � +r� �'a. Page 471 on 3No anon moa Io r Boa wuyz,wuinv N311%M S538d%3 3HI inure Ntlld10211N001tl1NOZ1210H 2 IDTOed 83H30 INV 603'laud w 31 %NI QYo�' �' £ -1IAI0 al-10S NJ02d D3sn 39 01 ION sl ONv 3n Vo anon boa ^v ° 9 U o i Item#11. , vann n uo m s H 30 Alaldoad IN si 30AUS 1VN0ISS3f0ad b;ca� O 3)1N3nna19d NV sV Nlle3H a3lvwdWD'd NVIORI3N VOU NIlNNVHJ M 96S1 `$ m m SP6630 ONV SV301 M ON SNVO 3A13M11V SVlllA 3Hl V IN3nn7oa SHI bd Pe F suo M'd ®� s vaa a 3sn3N z� oCfi 8L{ �, 98e u a C k e a;t 6 i; 3 zs ,cs z4 s a e��; A $ as sa I i.LLJ $4 w A �2 tlig • 6 ° �: � � � �a� `3'� �a �s�i � °e� �`8 gr� s� � g t � b� w c� e � ya it §e d a g �r R am or,_ R Ga:m a a. J a >. o U V bu �I� ry o eb§Ygggc �s epp r € I f �Y f -r---- 7--' - -----€- ,I ,. r ; r Cu,1. a r ---------------------- 4 , \ ry I i gGWC u / i I �� jl ✓ w o` H a �� w S f J I I I �I lid �\. ✓ in-' h'L� I � - -I l.� I��' —rL I r A I _._.__. .. --. SCBiL 3.BL�2.IUN ___ _.-. BI.r�.aN r90IL 3 i o i A Ospc m 2 y�gOS �3 Go d # Q" q a _ ex �— v CV Q a co goo r J W `y� 'I r, I 11J _ W uj co , W s 3s \\\ \ LL, gRSR QssRS°ih'6ae Page 472 EXHIBIT B Item#11. _ _ _._ __ ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil Mc.Gmne 2020-491679 BOISE IDAHO Pgs-5 BONNIE OBLRBILLIG 07122/020 01:13 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FFF T'rnie,t�i t�'ug�r,L�tindlvi_ainrs); Ihldgc 'na,ll, tt-A A( ;P.l',l;N/fl-;ill , 1mldc I-hi:; ?I st Cl v to July `O I>t;lvt`t;i.tl1 hilt si�,iu; I luau�,��llu':� l� s��ci,3Yion hc.rcillahcr rciclrcd to ;lr; "(lr;naior and Illc Cify O(" lvh"Iidian, an Idaho nalrnicipal colpw;ltiin.. hel,clrrafici I"( ICIlCil to ray; ,in k.c"' 1'a'I I FOR lIQ. (ir;rntor is the nwncc of rcoI Iingtcriy on Ironic N of which ills MY 4Nds;rAhm dc;;kew to eshblish ;l I)u(-Ilic pllllw;ay, acid MATTLAS, they (Mc)r C1CS1( s lc') i i gilt an C`,;rwnwN t ) cs{ahhwh a pUl)llc; i)r.rthway mid plovidc connecliv;ly in prcscnt ;Ind fnhne pollicros (dihc j)nIllyvay; and C;mntor sll;I11 conslrtic;t the inlprovc1licnl;; 11pnn Iltc cascnlcni dcm, rihcd hotchy and u!O1?v`, 'i'{110 I?I'WR I., fhc partic;, .I l,t e as ollow';: "1'111�. GIR-AT'd' 0 11 dues herehy gr(rnt unlo the (Antra an crr,;Cbnlal (in the (ialli))vinfr, I ropy oy,, do"scribcd of-I "A" and dcpictcd on kxhihit "W' ntt;lchcd hc,r(;io ;lief incmpor:ucd herein. 11ll? Ule.SL:,IVll;is!'I' hor(;hy i:; i,,'n. dic ptllpo:;c oi'providing ;'t pnhlic; pcdc'slrisall p"1111 wly esascmcnf fol. rnt1hiplc-trove nc>rl-nit)torifcd rc:c:rc;lliolr., wil_h (hc tree ril-dit of m cc.sw to sirch tac.iliiics al any ; nd tall th)-te°s. 'ro HAVE AND 1 ) 1 MILK saki rasonlc_nt. t-into said t irrulte.c, it:; r uc c,c,;si)rs ;Ind f�or'cvcr. I l'M URPOY"I IZ icrel, covcnanfs ;urd that it will not lihtci c>r ;dlmv to he pl'I("cd ;mv pci-Inalle.nt s(rrlc urps, tl es, Wish, ot, I)cK'n'nl!)I till't`tr115 (_)I- wilhin thc'' ;alcll de:-scrlhed 1,61- lhls c;-rscnacnf, which would IIII(Aerc vvth the use of said e'ascrncnl, Im I)urpo,cs iM(cd horesiu. IT I1-y I Xi'1R.1?`;Q;f_,y l ;fs!C:il Iw`;"1't)Ui) ,hull) I)y alld Irctwvc,11 the pm-lics 11°"Icto, lha 1. dill Grmlior• whall. repair- ;-nld Im)ini;airl d , paillwa.y irr,ptovcnlrntr;. TIfl-', Gl?'hNT01 h(trchy covc°Ilmli, im! ;r;anws ",Oh we (dywco flnd =.;hilt ld any p,n t of tic cas,c.rilen( hrrc,hy ta,)'; tltcd hec"oirre p;nt (d, ol. iii, within the L)c)r_uldali(-ta of mly pnlflic sirc.(A, i'ed�titri<ln I'at{lt t)r Lar,i:r)tc;nt IZF V. MAMMA) Page 473 Me>.Mtn City Council R,ic>.eting Agenda July 2l, 2.020 Page 184 of 59C1 EEI Lv!a�qd F a me j jO j SOd i v i-N I I I——io U P-11f1w,ly from F mp'),Cd I w,lvr! I 1"j I i(kfijn PEDESTRMN P/kT1-1WAY EASKMEXF `1111S /KiRMSONT, node this 21st, day or MY 20-/--, hctw.,"n hominarfur rcI'cvrcd to as "Grantor", and (lie City 4 Meridian, an Idaho FoUllic.ipal Corporation, hereinafter I-CFerl-cd to as "Grantee"; \-\/JTN EI'l I WI II?. WAS, Grantor is (lie owner or real properly on porliow; or which the Ui(y or N/rcridian desires to ustahlish ;I Mihhc pathway; and WHEREAS, the Chantur desires M grant an casement to establish a pohlic padiwrly and provide connectivity to luescid and hililre pol hons of the pathway.. and WHERITAS, Grantor sliall construct the palliway iMPMVCnKMIS IW(W IV; cascirren! duscribcd herein: and Pqo \V, '111FIRMURE, the par-tics agree. as Mhws: THE, (JRANTOR does hereby grant unto the Grantee an casement on the following properly, described oil F,'xliil,-)il "A" and defAuted on hSibit -11" attached herclo and incorporated herein. PRO EASENTN'r hereby gran(ed is for the pinliose of l)rovidkg a ImhHc pulesIdan pathway cascinclif for Intiltiple-usc non-Illolorizu(I ]-(,Creation, will) the free right of access to Balch facilities at any and all Iinws. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, said casement link) said Writee, its, sncccs,,qors and as-signs forever. 11-11", GN-ANTOR hereby covurims and agrees On it will not place or allow to be placed many pen-rinucill sUruclurcs, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers xMin the area described for Illis cos cIlIcII(, Which would intcribre "Th the one of said cascmein, for filc purposes stated hmAn. IT IS EXP,Rl-�'�SSLY I WDERSTOOD A1,41) AGREED, by and butwe" the puloics hereto, Out (he Grantor shall rellairavid rilainlain the pnlhwa.y inipioveillerits. TM GRANTOR hereby cmicnaids and agrccs, will-I I-lic (ir'ailtcc that sholild any part 0(' the easement lic-ruby granted hecon-ic pad of, or lie within Ille hot-III&Ilics of any public sti,cet, Pedestrian Pathway E'a'sellient RM HIM112020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21, 2020- Page '184 of 590 EEI Item#11. then, le such extent such cascrncnt. hereby granted which lies within sirch boundary ihercof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR. does hereby covenant with tile, Grantee (hat it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said casement., and that it will warrant and forever defend the title art(,[ quiet possession thereofagainst the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hercinabovc written. GRANTOR: Whitestone Sub HOA a STATE OF IDAHO ) ) s5 County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on e .G,,,�e-W(date) by ori(G..1� Nit? 1111, (name of individual), 1complete the,fi)lloavhig ifsi,f1111ilrg in a 1,epi,esent(itive copticily, or stl•ike rile follvlvirlg i/',rt rrrill > ill all ilulividlral ecrhacitl)) on behalf of y�`��u��i ufl (mine of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following r'cpresentative capacity: ea ;Lp. �C'Ct-r, t1,"n-y,C) ,(I (type ofau1[1101-ity such as ofCcer or trustee) (s(amp) Notary Signature Elo>s My Commission Expires: t U �'(' 1C1 r �'°� �•�'' ao. :1',gip ®0,11 IIOOi9OP�� Pedostrian Pathway Easement RLV. 01/01/2020 Page475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21, 2020- Page 185 of 590 Item#11. GRANT }i[ : C_'I'I'V Uh MF;RIDIAN ) Robeil. E, Simtscan,_Mayor Aftesl by C'hrls,/hc`thntion, C t1�7 t'9 i lc li 'I'All," M I DA I fC), ) : 5S. County of Arl a .) � This rt"cord vwas ukilowkdged hdol't: tttc on 7 2 I-2O _- "`' (date) by Robert 1?. Silvill; n and Chris Johnson oft behail' of the City Of Meridian, in their capocilic's as Mayor and 01v Clerk, respeclively, (stamp) __...._ .........:........._.............. ..,.._..,.......m.. _..... Nokiry Sipuatlu-c CHARLENE WAY 11Iy C'ontt,tission E pipe's 3-28-2022 COMMISSION#67390 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO ttiltY COMMISSION EXPIRES 3128/22 1 0destriun Pathwav f"a;ernent I:T:V, ()1/01%?02 Page 4�s Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21, 2020- Page 186 of 590 Item#11. Legal Description Public Pathway Easement All of Lot 11, Block I, Whitestone Cstates Subdivision, as shown on the Plat recorded in Book 72, Pages 7411 through 74,12, in the Office of the Recorder, Ada County, Idaho Page 477 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21, 2020-- Page 187 of 590 EXHIBIT C Item#11. ___.. _.._ _ ._ ADA COUNTY RFCORDFR Phil tilcGrane 2020-091679 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 07/22/2020 01:13 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN.IDAHO NO FFE Pr��Icri I"uiu_f;��Nh�tj�isirui�; �!i f••(„raw f�IIY,vay 1:��.yni-nl Onin 'ui�aed 1� r O:�k�6 +I Ili i.:hp, �I'I II A iIZI':I',IvII IV dc, llliS 2151 defy ilC )lily A) IWIwr•.,n ;�Vhiieslon�; 1�luni�u��r��iai ��>sucintic,i2 horcinal*I_c;r re(,circ.cl (.o as and (lie, Cily n( Ndcl lidinnr an Iloilo minlic.il7,cl coillornlion, hr,rcinafier rchi"l rcA IO 'm "(_i�;mtcc�'�; VA IMZL AS, Grarrlor is the ca ucr of ival prcll_rcriy on Ixirli m of mMir_l Ills (Wily om;rir.listn do 1rc.s In a Inihhc: pwlhvvply; and "WRFAX, Ilse (rr<lnit,r rlesh-w; ic) ;amit ,u) cri enwi-il Its c:;iwhlish a piddic :roil p lovicic mnnlr;clivily to pic'sc:n( and Mollie>n>; cal, the pailivvay, and WIMI .II.^S, ( ir;tnlm shall misllLtc;I flee la;llhany hvprovcr'ncnis upoll ills ('ascilicni clr;.ticrihcd herch and NOW, '11 l H 11UR 11 the I1arli s npoc as I'vllt= `IHT Gl:_AN'I'OR (Kc-s hetcby grain unlo the (AmnAw an c.rlsctncnl ort Q Mmirlg (mll)mv, dcscriE�c>tl cm I"'xhihii "A" and do pic,(c-cl cm I ,xhihil "I " <tltachcd ht,rcto ,trtcl ilea pov� tted ht'.rcilt. 111F E?h;,HM1?N'(' lunchy gnn led i;; 161 thr hinposr ol,provitJinso; n hnblic, pcdc�driall pailmay cascnlcrtl trrt. mtllliplc-ut ;c non-nloi recrcwhon., with the Irt!(� rilzhi (al wcc,c�:, to sur;h I,acihtics at ally and wil lrt7res. 11) HAVE AND 11) 110111_), said ca nrcrri m) s,+Ic Grwnt�:.c,, it's ucc;c,;ss rs mid issigjv; T111,', GRANTOR hcri_by cover 1,11w; and aprccs Thai it will not thick or allovd (o he pinc:ed ally peritl"Incilt sttuclures, ace's, lujish, or 1wrennivil shrt_ths or flowers WhK We wrest iicsr.rihal Or Ihis case.rrtcnt.. v"hich �vmilcl in(crIcre yyiih Ill(• ltr;c cal said lot the Ilurllcl c�; s(rrlc�tl h av i l r. I1 l`i I ivx,m AM) AGI0`,I,]), by and hckvecil ilre pmlics Hereto, (hat the GI-n rtor ,hail repair wild maininin Illc palhway irrrl�rclvcrrtcrn(ts. TI III (,'RAN`hOR horcby c m crimoN anal agrees "Wh the (i ontro Hun AM any pair of file or lsc,rllcri Ir+"rc:hy ;vwrltcd hccomc.• t»irl ol, or lie tvil#lit? 111c hmin&n ices oI, ;lily I_,nhlic Pedl_strinn P'ithwl ly I:I"Al. (1) 011'''?O.'(1 Page478 McMbn My Council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020 Page 184 of 590 EEI Prn'c.ct N.amc Nthdiyision) 4V41lln•„Irx�c('aghway Ea"m,.l't if"it I lwr Igo Oafs Po 1 Iljj4 q,a PEDh,S'! RIAN �'1� � � �1"�Y Ir.A �'.• '�I'al�r' ' TI II, I 21st - M � 2 J,� Witgleslunu Norg7eovmca varariatil�Ii S �\tr z1�;h;>vf1NT mtidc Chts � ay t�F ) t) , hctrvc�crt , hercinakcr rci`crrcd to as "Grantor", and the City of* Ivlcridwil, ua Idsallo 111L icipal corporation, hcrclnaftcr refcrred to as "Grantee"; INFFNHSSETI1: Wlfl ltt?i\S, Grantor is the owner of' real properly on porlions of'which thc City of Meridian desk-cs to csiahhsh a puhlic pathway; and WF-fI RI--AS, the Grantor desire's to "rant an ensenacnt to cmahlisla a public pathway and provide connc;clivily to present and hilure porlions of the paillway: and WI ll-,,R �'A& Grantor shall covis(ruct the pathway impmmi-imus upon dw c;asoviod described herein; and NO \V, 'I'III-;RHIR()REV the pni-des agree as IbHows: TI IA GCZAN'1't)Il does hereby grant unto the, Runwe an enscrrrent on the Mo Anp, prripe.rty) described on I xhibil "A" and dopicicd on t�:xhddt "f3" alttt hal hcwto and inc wywand hcmin. 'I [lt? E ASL;i\�WNT hereby granted is ror the purpose or providing ,a public pairsthan patlawa;, etascmcnt for rclJrcation, Mill Ihc. free (A access. in ',t_rc:h Cacilitics at any and all times. 'I't) HAVE AND '14) HOLD, said casement unto said (ir,antee. A ;ucccs<,ors and assi lls forever. TIIL GRAN' UR hereby covenants and agmes Thal it will not place or allow to be placed any permancaat struchires, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this casement, which Would interl-cre Willi the use of, said casement, liar ilac purposes sl atcd herein, IT IS t1ND130011)(H) AND AGRI I,,1), by ,in(] between the: parties hereto, that the Grantor shall repair and maintain the prathway improvenacnN. "fill-, ONANT(_)R hereby cowc.n,ant.ti and agrees with the t;rante.c that should an'), part of dic cascnrrent hereby grantcd Become part of', or lie within the houu( nrics oh ;any public sheet, Pedestrian Patlmay IJ<iscment RFV 01A)4200) EEI Meridian City council Meeting Agenda July 21,2020— Page 184 of 590 Item#11. then, to such extent such cascrncnl hereby granted which lies wilhin such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be COnIpletcly rcliruluished, THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee (hat it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and That it has a good and lawful right to convey said casement, and that it will wan'ant and forever defend the title and uluiel possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its si;Mature the day and year first hcreinabove written. GKANTOR: Whitestone Sub HOA t , i > STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada This record was acknowledged before me on v-1.�G , 4-0-�tcJ(date') by S6,C(J-t Kjoj )-)-��_ (name of individual), [complete the fvlloivirr5 in a r•epr•esewative calnicitY, ur str•ikc the ,1611 ving i1'sc giring in an individrtal crzimacitl'I on behalf of �l��ts�2�'t�►�'1_, 4 �u>i'� (name of ciatity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following represclitative capacity: \l ;t ' �"r of authority such as officer or trustee) (stamp) Notary Signa(ure GN �'ssl"'f My Commission Expires: ( ' ;U -!( I() 00, "Lo d ® 4 a d®�10 oC�ev0 VD l Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 01/01/2010 Page48o Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21, 2020- Pago 185 of 590 (INKArmt if v. 5 W 560,79 —nun 1, —Nm-- -jv a'L- 14 .... .... .... ?A wr rn 60z. to l,6 N 00--14'jfj' E 3f,,7 70 t•a.. $ .dt• 7 f P`� - ``" T $. .d;, c,i,j yy L. LIOOus"TOPO,'VA sm 4� 17, V, -u 'ji C> q-i-to r v) rT) LD irl L. 7-' u 12 C/L S."m kOAD HA95 Or NAAYNC to o CvV.Twoof)MAT" Liz X) CD g -T4 00 R1.) J-f ill tTj lilt ICU 6.,(- 6�Jdy 21,2020— Inlif�Aeeting AgIJ -7 M&+n City pag SS of 590 EEI C;1Z_�1JJ`l Il,. (_'I1�Y O!!f; n�II;R11�1i1N / 1 f:ohcrt 1 , Sin lson, ftlayor, — --- Aticsi by WI'n'l U OF IDA1111 ) ss. C'ounly of Ada ) This record was acknowkAged bakwc me on _- `1�?U7` (dalc'.) by Robert I,;, ShIrison and (.'Ends Johnson on hchalf of the City of Mci idian, in their capncilre.s as Mayor and (Wily Clerk. reshi;clivcly. Notary 's igl In11-t e CHA~,RLENE WAY M1 , C�mlmission f� � --28-2022 COMMISSION#67390 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 3/28/22 ..................... ....... ....._.....__....__....._........_..................... Pcdeslrian Pathway F-a"xinent REV. 01=2020 Page482 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21, 2020— Page 186 of 590 Item#11. i Legal Description Public Pathway Easement All of Lot 11, Block 1., Whil.estone Estates Subdivision, as shown on the Plat recorded in Book 72, Pages 7411 through 7412, in the Office of the Recorder, Ada Coi►nty, Idaho Page 483 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda July 21, 202.0— Page 187 of 590 UNP[ArMl t. 'J4'18 w i,68.79 A 4 -- -------- R 1AMIAKE MITY I 5c,W It oTam ---------- 64' M 70 fter 7 r. III,II--4-AII f ti $$ ''F'f'f '' a `� ' p,T,r,i �1 i -TOW AY UOONSniTi V 4 7 4 J� T Xz wn IN: uZ, w JIM' aor C) C) C) AV I M X yr —AW L �(2 In r "to :71 A Q I-D cti. IWDER RoAn :j 's- > -) rlZr-S-ITnOrl"-TATtS C3) b-I C) qS Y __ 1G +,A IV ra C � F G��p + ( �� J oo '�G � 1�'� �� y b �� a'�y S� §�i �'a�Su�� 11{ I ( � �; I'��2 71 U3 Mori4n City 4-AllIcAmeeting Agcncia July 21,2020- Pag 88 of 590 EXHIBIT D '2 Mi Now 31 1 14 W a SAW 1:54 6,60 it, RON Q, d"M slog 50 v"!a "; ; 1 lop fit" SA U I IN to mg SO? DQ C4 E-3. :1 RNA Of 7 1 14 --- ----------- dl� L Mot L "I q-1 e 485 -P191 Item#11. Ti owl fill its Lwi' A; 0 in lot 0 "Mold 1 1 too 0. f-A - Cu/) a OMI� PON! tit I I v all IRS; 7; es 51 --F-p,-g-,',487 Item#12. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Finance Department: Annual Citywide Fee Updates Page 488 FY2020 Citywide Fee Updates Item#12. New Existing Fee r e . OldFeeAmount Fire Department Fees Mobile Food Vendor Inspection Any mobile food vendors that cook-will be required to have a $ 45.00 New fire department inspection annually $ - Community Development Fees Performance,Warranty and Performance Surety and Warranty Surety,and the preparation Development of Surety of a formal Development Surety Agreement $ 233.00 New Agreement Fee $ - Residential 200 amps or less,one location. Temporary power Every temporary power pole must be called in for inspection. poles/construction services Idaho Power will not set the meter until the temporary pole has $ 40.00 $ 40.00 passed city inspection. To be installed for construction purposes only for a period not to Existing exceed one(1)year. Residential over 200 amps and all Commercial Construction Temporary power Every temporary power pole must be called in for inspection. Commercial fee Commercial fee poles/construction services Idaho Power will not set the meter until the temporary pole has schedule(Ref No. schedule(Ref No. passed city inspection. 2.2.09) 2.2.09) To be installed for construction purposes only for a period not to Existing exceed one(1)year. Stand Alone 2 year Warranty a stand-alone two-year Warranty Surety for public works Surety Agreement infrastructure installations,and the preparation of a formal $ 180.00 New Warranty Surety Agreement. $ Stand alone performance surety a stand-alone Performance Surety,without the preparation of a w/o a Formal Development 00 .$ 162 New Surety Agreement formal Development Surety Agreement $ This fee is intended to cover the process to reduce an existing Surety Reduction Fee surety at the time of expiration/renewal only.This fee would be $ 69.00 New applicable for each request. $ Commercial Temporary Certificate of Occupancy requests are Temporary Certificate of very time consuming for the Community Development Occupancy(TCO)Fee Department.These requests take time to process and include $ 114.75 support from the permit counter,Land Development Section, New Planning Division,and the Building Section. $ Public Works Fees New Sewer System Repair Fee: Additional Collections Technician(per hour) $ 35.39 $ New Sewer System Repair Fee: CCTV Van with one Collections Technician(per hour) $ 54.97 $ Hydrocleaner Service Truck with one Collections Technician New Sewer System Repair Fee: (per hour) $ 54.97 $ New Water Meters: OMNI Hydrant Meter H2 Handle $ 33.40 $ New Water Meters: OMNI Hydrant Meter H2 Lock Handle Assembly $ 14.78 $ New Water Meters: OMNI Hydrant Meter H2 Register $ 371.86 $ New Water Meters: OMNI Hydrant Meter H2 Register w/Chamber $ 899.86 $ New Water Meters: OMNI Hydrant Meter H2 Support Bracket $ 406.00 $ New Water System Repair Fee: 1"IP 250 PSI Poly Pipe Per linear Ft. $ 0.67 $ New Water System Repair Fee: 1.5"IP 250 PSI Poly Pipe Per linear Ft. $ 1.56 $ New Water System Repair Fee: 10" C-900 Pipe Per linear Ft. $ 13.42 $ New Water System Repair Fee: 10" Repair Coupler $ 282.50 $ New Water System Repair Fee: 12" C-900 Pipe Per linear Ft. $ 18.97 $ New Water System Repair Fee: 12" Repair Coupler LIPS(Long Pattern Sleeve) $ 177.24 $ New Water System Repair Fee: 12" Wedge Restraint Gland Pack $ 137.92 $ New Water System Repair Fee: 2"IP 250 PSI Poly Pipe Per linear Ft. $ 2.57 $ New Water System Repair Fee: 3/4"Road Base Material-per yd $ 17.80 $ New Water System Repair Fee: 4" C-900 Pipe Per linear Ft. $ 2.60 $ New Water System Repair Fee: 4" Repair Coupler $ 133.38 $ New Water System Repair Fee: 6" C-900 Pipe Per linear Ft. $ 5.15 $ New Water System Repair Fee: 6" Repair Coupler $ 189.65 $ New Water System Repair Fee: 8" C-900 Pipe Per linear Ft. $ 8.95 $ New Water System Repair Fee: 8" Repair Coupler $ 235.63 $ New Water System Repair Fee: Silt Sand-per yard $ 12.34 $ Page 489 FY2020 Citywide Fee Updates Item#12. New Existing Fee Description . • . Fee Amount New Water System Repair Fee: STORZ fitting-4.5 hydrant nozzle $ 145.60 $New Water System Repair Fee: Traffic Rated Ring 20" $ 84.62 $ - Existing Water System Repair Fee: Lid Only-24"Manhole Cover $ 269.90 $ 146.12 Existing Water System Repair Fee: Hydrant Meter 2.5 FHT Swivel/no screen $ 109.81 $ 72.79 Existing Water System Repair Fee: 1 inch Angle Valve $ 139.17 $ 99.62 Existing Water System Repair Fee: Traffic Rated Lid 20" $ 153.85 $ 110.20 Existing Water System Repair Fee: 3/4"IP 20OPSI Poly Pipe Per linear Ft. $ 0.43 $ 0.33 Existing Water System Repair Fee: Traffic Rated Meter Tub 42" $ 142.12 $ 110.20 Water System Repair Fee: Non-Traffic Rated 42"Meter Tub/Tile for Single/Double $ 121.98 $ 95.76 Existing Services Existing Water System Repair Fee: Non-Trafic Meter Tub 36" $ 121.98 $ 95.76 Existing Water System Repair Fee: 2 inch Angle Valve $ 356.40 $ 289.36 Existing Water System Repair Fee: 1.5 inch Angle Valve $ 302.03 $ 246.28 Existing Water System Repair Fee: Meter Setter 2 inch $ 1,926.24 $ 1,718.98 Existing Water System Repair Fee: 2 inch gate valve for hydrant meter $ 194.42 $ 185.16 Existing Water System Repair Fee: Meter Setter 1 inch $ 546.14 $ 530.22 Existing Water System Repair Fee: Meter Setter 3/4 inch $ 328.04 $ 318.48 Existing Water System Repair Fee: 1"x 1"IP PE Compression x Compression Grip Coupler $ 59.93 $ 58.19 Existing Water System Repair Fee: 3/4 FIP x FIP Brass Curb Stop Valve $ 66.84 $ 66.83 Existing Water System Repair Fee: Padlock $ 6.79 $ 7.43 Existing Water System Repair Fee: 1"IP Compression x 3/4 MIP Brass Fitting $ 42.52 $ 46.67 Existing Water System Repair Fee: Cast-Iron Valve Lid $ 12.00 $ 14.87 Existing Water System Repair Fee: 3/4 inch angle valves $ 84.73 $ 111.90 Page 490 Item#13. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: City of Meridian Financial Report-July 2020 Page 491 Item#13. CITY of MERIDIAN FINANCE REPORT July 2020 Report PAGE # Investment Graphs 2 Fund Balance 3 Am -_ ------------ going IF_ I Page 492 F:\Monthly Reports\Finance Reports\FY2020\FY20-10 Jul Council Report 1 of 3 Item#13. ��E ND� City of Meridian Investment Portfolio CITY OF MERIDIAN INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO YIELD BY INVESTMENTTYPE IDAHO STATE POOL 0.86% IDAHO BOND FUND 1.71% CASH 0.00% FIB 1.14% MONEYMARKET CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 2.40% INVESTOR CASH 1.83% •Government Bonds$0 •Muncipal Bonds$1,128,274 MUNCIPAL BONDS 1.90% ■Investor Cash$2,267,170 ■Certificateof Deposit$400,000 ■FIB MoneyMarket$1,639,733 ■Cash$6,152,744 GOVERNMENT 1 BONDS .90% •Idaho Bond Fund$21,705,202 •Idaho State Pool$123,571,478 City of Meridian I nterest/Investment I nco me City of Meridian Cash/Investments Balance by Major Fund by Major Fund $1,200,000 $120,000,000 $1,000,000 $100,000,000 $800,000 $80,000,000 $600,000 $60,000,000 $400,000 $40,000,000 $200,000 $20,000,000 $0 General Enterprise General Fund Enterprise Fund ■Total Budget ■Actual YFD ■FY2020 ■FY2019 Page 493 F:\Monthly Reports\Finance Reports\FY2020\FY20-10 Jul Council Report 2 of 3 is Item#13. IDIAN�- r�AHo GENERAL FUND BALANCE ALLOCATIONS $80,000,000 $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 9/30/2015 9/30/2016 9/30/2017 9/30/2018 9/30/2019 ■Nonspendable ■Restricted ■Committed ■Assigned ■Unassigned le Reserves ENTERPRISE FUND BALANCE ALLOCATIONS $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 -- ....., $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 9/30/2015 9/30/2016 9/30/2017 9/30/2018 9/30/2019 ■Assigned ■Unassigned ■Reserves Page 494 F:\Monthly Reports\Finance Reports\FY2020\FY20-10 Jul Council Report 3 of 3 Fund Balance Item#14. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: AP Invoices for Payment- 08-26-20 - $1,403,173.98 Page 495 Item#14. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund ADA COUNTY PARAMEDICS 220/Heartsaver CPR AED eCards(9)-City Training 180.00 01 General Fund ADA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE Inmate Housing for July 2020 43.33 01 General Fund ALL AMERICAN TOWING TOWING DR20-4388 7/27 357 Waterbury 137.00 01 General Fund BACKGROUND SOLUTIONS LLC Background Assistant Software/web-based Applications 1,590.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole#28776C 94.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole#28914C 94.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole#28915C 196.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole#28920C 94.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole#29001C 196.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole#29119C 196.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole#29143C 196.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole#29305B 196.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole#29485C 196.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole#29984C 196.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole#29985C 94.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole#30740C 94.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole#30741C 196.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole#40060C 196.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole#40061C 196.00 01 General Fund BILLING DOCUMENT SPECIALISTS 20-0004 FY20 JULY 20 BILLS AND DELINQUENT 179.43 NOTICES 01 General Fund BOISE SOFTBALL UMPIRES ASSOC. 20-0231 softball umpires 7/27-7/31/20-city 46.5 1,343.85 games 01 General Fund BONNEVILLE BLUE PRINT SUPPLY Fairview Avenue Connection plan set copies-city 66 12.54 01 General Fund BOUNDTREE MEDICAL 220/4 no contact infrared thermometers city 4,COVID 257.16 01 General Fund BRADY INDUSTRIES, LLC. 20-0273 4 cs Sanitizer Instant Gel 70 per alcohol 592.00 01 General Fund BRADY INDUSTRIES, LLC. 20-0295 5 cs Sanitizer instant Gel 70 per alcohol 740.00 01 General Fund BRADY INDUSTRIES, LLC. 220/Janitorial and Shop supplies-Sta. 1 97.35 01 General Fund BRADY INDUSTRIES, LLC. 220/Janitorial,Sta. 3 268.11 01 General Fund BRADY INDUSTRIES, LLC. 5 cs of sanitizer gel 70%alcohol 740.00 01 General Fund BRICON, INC 20-0219 pay#2 FMC Path James Court Sidewalk 71,440.00 Widening 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Battery for Unit#6 126.00 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Ford Seat Covers for Drivers Seat,as Needed 859.03 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Front Brake Hardware Replacement Unit# 15 65.90 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil Change&Air Filter for Unit#31 76.60 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil Change and Tranc.Svc Unit#48 155.02 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil Change for Unit# 122 64.99 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil Change for Unit# 131 90.51 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil change, Front&Rear Brakes for Unit# 140 902.24 Date:8/18/20 01:18:13 PM Page:1 Page 496 Item#14. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil Change,Wipers, Replace CV Shaft&TPMS Sensor 398.87 #14 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC old credit on account Bruneel (87.35) 01 General Fund CHAD SOMBKE, PH.D, P.C. New Hire Pre-employment evaluation 400.00 01 General Fund CHAD SOMBKE, PH.D, P.C. Pre Employment Background Screening 400.00 01 General Fund CHAD SOMBKE, PH.D, P.C. Pre Employment Testing 400.00 01 General Fund CLAYTON'S CALCIUM,INC. ball field chalk-city 80 485.00 01 General Fund COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 20-0271 Streetlight Install ITD-Chinden Svcs to 6/30/20 206,897.00 01 General Fund CURTS DISCOUNT SHOOTERS SUPPLY FIREARMS PANTS-x3 2,667.00 01 General Fund CUSTOM INK LLC SPRING VOLLEYBALL CHAMPION SHIRTS QTY20 474.00 01 General Fund D&B SUPPLY bolts for Kleiner Park splash pad -city 0.07 0.35 01 General Fund D&B SUPPLY DI PREY LID TRT DOG FOOD 25 LBS X2 K9 WYATT 93.58 01 General Fund D&B SUPPLY DI PREY LID TRT DOG FOOD 25LBS X2 103.98 01 General Fund D&B SUPPLY hedge trimmer parts-city 24 9.44 01 General Fund D&B SUPPLY Kleiner Park splash pad bolts-qty 6 5.82 01 General Fund D&B SUPPLY one-gallon sprayers-city 2 35.98 01 General Fund DENNIS DILLON POWER SPORTS Clutch Replacement for Unit#526 891.10 01 General Fund DENNIS DILLON POWER SPORTS Credit Invoice# 7502404-City Discount Unit# 526 (89.00) 01 General Fund DENNIS DILLON POWER SPORTS Oil Change for Unit# 522 91.33 01 General Fund DIVISION OF BLDG SAFETY Annual ID Div of Bldg Safety Elevator Certification 375.00 01 General Fund DONE RITE TREE CO. tree removal for James Court Sidewalk Widening 550.00 01 General Fund DONE RITE TREE CO. Well House#16 tree pruning&removal 1,950.00 01 General Fund EASYDRIFT Replaced Training Tire 634.90 01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO 20-0275 LED Upgrade 14 Fixture Purchase 4/13/20 2,112.56 01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO 20-0275 Purchase 14 LED Fixtures on 4/13/20 676.82 01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO 20-0275 Purchase 9 LED Fixtures on 4/13/20 4,098.91 01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO 220/Bulbs Sta. 3-Scott Smith P/U 62.03 01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO 220/Generator Transfer Switches(2)-Sta. 5 248.78 01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO 220/Light Bulbs, Building Maintenance 31.43 01 General Fund ENHANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS Settlers Park NVR recorder adjustments to security 97.00 system 01 General Fund ETC INSTITUTE City survey administration(Invoice#3) 6,600.00 01 General Fund ETC INSTITUTE City survey invoice#4(final report draft) 2,200.00 01 General Fund FAMILY TANG SOO DO instructor fee-Martial Arts 6/30-7/28/20-city 9 260.00 01 General Fund FIVE STAR TOWING DR20-4459 towed vehicle for investigation 237.00 01 General Fund GALL'S INC. Batons for Mobile Field Force 72.68 01 General Fund GALL'S INC. Gloves for Mobile Filed Force 290.40 01 General Fund GALL'S INC. Holster for Inventory 51.92 01 General Fund GEM STATE PAPER&SUPPLY CO Lysol disinfectant for all parks-city 5 cases 274.19 01 General Fund GRAINGER 220/Shop Supplies,Sta. 4-Cleaner/Degreaser 42.02 Date:8/18/20 01:18:13 PM Page:2 Page 497 Item#14. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund GRAINGER 220/DEF,St. 6,delivered 8-4-20 435.38 01 General Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY PVC caps-city 12 8.64 01 General Fund HORIZON DISTRIBUTORS INC 48 inch Exmark mower deck belts-city 2 276.80 01 General Fund HORIZON DISTRIBUTORS INC oil for Kleiner Park Exmark 48 inch mower-city 1 8.44 01 General Fund HORIZON DISTRIBUTORS INC small engine parts-city 13 70.57 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE INSURANCE FUND #36670,Workers Comp Payroll Premium 167,746.34 4/1/20-6/30/20- 01 General Fund INTERMOUNTAIN GAS 0981623008 July 2020 933.78 01 General Fund INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL Training Material BCaulder/SZahloka 1,217.27 01 General Fund INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER Batteries for emergency lights at Council Chambers& 193.50 Gallery 01 General Fund INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER batteries for Lanark Parks Shop-city 5 57.03 01 General Fund JAZZERCISE LLC instructor fee-Jazzercise 7/2-7/31/20-city 13 540.80 01 General Fund JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE 20-0054 Fire Alarm Monitoring at Homecourt to 9/30 35.00 PROTECTION LP 01 General Fund JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE 20-0054 Fire Extinguisher Test and Inspect FSC 54.00 PROTECTION LP 01 General Fund JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE 20-0054 Fire Extinguisher Test and Inspection FS 3 54.00 PROTECTION LP 01 General Fund JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE 20-0054, 20-0261 Fire Alarm Monitoring at Various 290.33 PROTECTION LP Buildings 01 General Fund JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE 20-0261 Set up of monitoring at Fire Station 6 240.00 PROTECTION LP 01 General Fund JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE Replaced 60 fire extinguishers at City Hall 2,400.00 PROTECTION LP 01 General Fund KUSHLAN ASSOCIATES 20-0281 PSA-Kushlan Associates Open Space& 2,467.50 Amenities Stan 01 General Fund L.N.CURTIS AND SONS 20-0208 220/16 pair structure boots 6,091.40 01 General Fund LARSON-MILLER,INC Bio Hazard Pick Up 322.16 01 General Fund LAURIE MCELROY instructor fee-Yoga 6/6-8/1/20-city 32 1,536.00 01 General Fund LAURIE MCELROY instructor fee-Yoga 6/8-7/30/20-city 13 499.20 01 General Fund LAWN CO MAINTENANCE 20-0222 price code 1/landscape maintenance contract 24,575.00 08/2020 01 General Fund LAWN CO MAINTENANCE 20-0222 price code 2/landscape maintenance contract 7,800.00 08/2020 01 General Fund LAWN CO MAINTENANCE Pine Street tree well work 2,570.00 01 General Fund LEXIS NEXIS On line legal research 130.00 01 General Fund MODERN PRINTERS Business Cards for PD Officer&Recruiting 129.00 01 General Fund MODERN PRINTERS Historical Society Walking Tour guides-city 1000 1,296.00 01 General Fund MOORE ELIA KRAFT&HALL, LLP DASCO Matter 4/10/20-7/28/2020 2,805.00 Date:8/18/20 01:18:13 PM Page:3 Page 498 Item#14. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund MOTION&FLOW CONTROL PRODUCTS hose fittings for Discovery Park pressure washer-qty 4 64.97 01 General Fund MOTION&FLOW CONTROL PRODUCTS replacement hose part for Fuller Park-city 1 20.30 01 General Fund MOTIONS DANCE STUDIO instructor fee-Passport to Dance, 264.00 Princess/Fairy...7/7-7/29 01 General Fund NESMITH BROTHERS TOWING Tow to Point S for Large Leak, Unit# 162 75.00 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. 220/Clear labels 13.49 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. 220/Pens and clipboards 23.98 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. 24pk of 3x3 sticky notes for PW, 2 dzn gel pens for B. 27.14 Young 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Cord, untangler black,fork plastic 1000ct whit,spoon 63.23 plast 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Finance&MUBS Supply Refill-Velcro Tape Badge 28.81 Holders Pen 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Finance office supply refill-ID Badge clips 12.39 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Finance Office Supply Refill-Pens 26.29 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Knife Retractable Hoby,B Blade#11 Dispenser ofl 10.35 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Office supplies mayors office-envelope moistener 4.98 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Office supplies mayors office-post its, markers, 40.45 scissors 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Office Supplies Plan Review 104.27 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. PadLegal 8.5x11.75 Canar 8.60 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Paper, 250SH,90# Exindex,G 8.21 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Plan Review office supplies 16.32 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Scanned stamp for automated deposits 4.72 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. wall calendar, pens, markers-city 5 46.03 01 General Fund ON THE SPOT CLEANERS#15 Uniform Dry Cleaning for PD,July 2020 828.00 01 General Fund OXARC,INC. Traffic Cones for Patrol Vehicles 316.00 01 General Fund PORTAPROS, LLC portable toilets for Heritage 7/16/20 602.80 01 General Fund PORTAPROS, LLC portable toilets for Jabil Fields 7/16/20 425.40 01 General Fund PRECISION AUTOMATION SYSTEMS amiad sigma filter for Reta Huskey Park 2,535.00 01 General Fund PROLINE PAVEMENT pathway asphalt repair in Bear Creek Park 9,525.00 01 General Fund REAL ANIMAL MANAGEMENT 20-0144 goose management services-July 2020 4,000.00 01 General Fund REPUBLIC SERVICES July 2020 Rental of 3-30 Containers-T.Otte 309.48 01 General Fund RICOH USA,INC C86243698 July Copier Reads 78.04 01 General Fund RICOH USA,INC C86276344 Ricoh Copier Color Black and White Copies 297.74 July 01 General Fund RICOH USA,INC Copier Addt'I Images July 2020, PSTC C86247349 26.51 01 General Fund RICOH USA,INC Copier,Addt'I Images for July 2020,CID C86284085 536.73 01 General Fund RICOH USA,INC Copier,Addt'I Images for July 2020, Lt Hall C86216993 94.77 01 General Fund RICOH USA,INC Copier,Addt'I Images July 2020,Comm Svc C86197400 33.64 Date:8/18/20 01:18:13 PM Page:4 Page 499 Item#14. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund RICOH USA,INC print copy Plan Review S/N C86243745 29.06 01 General Fund ROCKY MOUNTAIN COLLISION 220/emission test, MFO18 9.98 01 General Fund SAFEBUILT LLC 20-0095 Contracted Svcs. Bldg and Mech Plan Review 132,201.31 7/2020 01 General Fund SALT LAKE WHOLESALE SPORTS GLOCK 43x AMGLO SIGHTS X5, PLUS 2 DAY UPS 2,055.50 SHIPPING 01 General Fund SHRED-IT USA, LLC. 220/Shredding St. 1,2,4, 5,6 183.33 01 General Fund SHRED-IT USA, LLC. Document Shredding Service-July 61.42 01 General Fund SHRED-IT USA, LLC. Finance,Clerks, MUBS July 2020 Shredding 115.50 01 General Fund SIGNS, ETC Logo for Bait Trailer, Burg Investigations 180.00 01 General Fund SILVER CREEK SUPPLY 20-0370 4G cellular routers-city 12 25,737.76 01 General Fund SILVER CREEK SUPPLY credit on sprinklers-city 13 (421.23) 01 General Fund SILVER CREEK SUPPLY credit on sprinklers-city 79 (1,507.73) 01 General Fund SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY, LLC moisture manager for Renaissance Park-city 4 560.19 01 General Fund SPORTSENGINE INC background checks for instructors-city 2 37.00 01 General Fund STEELMAN PLUMBING Fix Leaking Faucet5s at K9 Building 145.00 01 General Fund STEELMAN PLUMBING K9 Building Toilet Replacement 507.25 01 General Fund SUNBELT RENTALS Jack Hammer for Storey Park 8/4-8/5/20 230.00 01 General Fund SUNBELT RENTALS manlift for Cole Valley basketball service 7/30/20 413.52 01 General Fund SYRINGA NETWORKS, LLC 20-0040 Dark Fiber(4 Strands) 1,150.00 01 General Fund SYRINGA NETWORKS, LLC Internet B/W(1GB)Incr 4/28/20,Internet B/W 1,595.00 (100MB) 01 General Fund TATES RENTS(GENERAL OFFICE) manlift rental for ball retrieval @ Boys&Girls Club 175.00 8/7/20 01 General Fund TENZINGA Tenzinga Performance Management Annual License 480.00 Fee(May 2020 01 General Fund THE LAND GROUP, INC. 2020 park site map work-July 2020 1,925.00 01 General Fund THE UPS STORE#2586 220/Shipping and insurance cardiac monitor repair 300.85 01 General Fund THE UPS STORE#2586 MAIL EVIDENCE TO STATE LAB 57.28 01 General Fund THE UPS STORE#2586 Postage to Send Headset for Repair 19.11 01 General Fund TREASURE VALLEY COFFEE Coffee,Sugar,Cups and Cooler Rental for PD 256.85 01 General Fund TREASURE VALLEY TENNIS instructor fee-Tennis 7/21-7/30/20-qty 110 2,816.00 ASSOCIATION 01 General Fund VARSITY FACILITY SERVICES 20-0087 City-wide Janitorial Services to 7/31/20 17,868.69 01 General Fund WESTERN RECORDS DESTRUCTION 2020 Records Destruction 833.00 01 General Fund WESTERN STATES EQUIPMENT CO old credit on account (4.00) 01 General Fund WEX BANK INC #0496-00-332449-8,7/31/2020_WEX Fuel 29,957.20 01 General Fund WIENHOFF DRUG TESTING Drug and Alcohol Testing Services-July 2020 480.00 01 General Fund WIENHOFF DRUG TESTING Pre Employment Testing July202O 260.00 Date:8/18/20 01:18:13 PM Page:5 Page 500 Item#14. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund WIENHOFF DRUG TESTING REFUND: MOVIE NIGHT SPONSORSHIP CANCELLED 600.00 DUE TO COVID 01 General Fund WILLIAM PARKER JR New Hire Training Academy Role Player 120.00 01 General Fund YOUNG REMBRANDTS instructor fee-Colorful Critters 7/27-7/31/20-city 15 1,320.00 Total 01 General Fund 782,437.42 07 Impact Fund DOOR SERVICE OF IDAHO 220/install lite ktis in doors @ St. 6 581.00 07 Impact Fund ENGINEERED STRUCTURES INC 220/Application #17,St. 6 CMGC services to 6/30 57,457.60 Total 07 Impact Fund 58,038.60 20 Grant Fund JESSE TREE OF IDAHO 20-0131 CDBG PY19#9 Jesse Tree Homelessness 1,005.00 governmental Preventio 20 Grant Fund TREND LETTERS PO#20-0349:10k N95, 10k surgical masks,150 boxes 68,468.50 governmental gloves Total 20 Grant Fund 69,473.50 governmental 60 Enterprise ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT 19-0307 Linder Ustick McMillan svc to 7/23/20 31,809.02 Fund 60 Enterprise AIR FILTER SUPERSTORE WHOLESALE HVAC pleated air filters(24 city) 98.04 Fund LLC 60 Enterprise ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC. IPDES testing(1 test) 23.00 Fund 60 Enterprise ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC. PO#20-0005, Micro Sampling Bacti 1,611.20 Fund 60 Enterprise ANDREW&BRIAN STEINMEYER REFUND WT/S/T: 4132 N ALESTER AVE CUSTOMER 47.52 Fund PAID AFTER CLOSIN 60 Enterprise BATTERIES PLUS BULBS 12V 65AGM Battery,C18131,WO#301994 182.90 Fund 60 Enterprise BATTERIES PLUS BULBS 6V Crown Flooded 6 Batteries for Trailer,WO#303204 611.60 Fund 60 Enterprise BENJAMIN&CELINA INNOCENT REFUND WT/S/T: 2000 E KAYMAY DR ACH 75.78 Fund PROCESSED AFTER CLOSING 60 Enterprise BILLING DOCUMENT SPECIALISTS 20-0004 FY20 IVR PHONE SERVICES JULY 2020 2,468.00 Fund 60 Enterprise BILLING DOCUMENT SPECIALISTS 20-0004 FY20 JULY 20 BILLS AND DELINQUENT 13,262.62 Fund NOTICES Date:8/18/20 01:18:13 PM Page:6 Page 501 Item#14. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise BILLING DOCUMENT SPECIALISTS PRINTING COSTS FOR BILL BLANKS 6,500.00 Fund 60 Enterprise BOISE CALIBRATION SERVICE Calibration on Backflow Testing Kit,Qty 1 95.00 Fund 60 Enterprise BOISE CALIBRATION SERVICE Calibration on Backlfow Testing Kit,Qty 1 130.00 Fund 60 Enterprise BROOK&RANDELL GLENN REFUND WT/S/T: 2218 W VERONA DR TITLE 64.43 Fund COMPANY OVERPAID 60 Enterprise BROWN &CALDWELL 20-0214, 20-0360 WRRF Capacity Expansion service 86,250.50 Fund to 6/25/20 60 Enterprise CALLAGHAN FAMILY TRUST JAMES& REFUND WT/S/T: 4280 N HERITAGE WOOD WAY 75.79 Fund SUSAN STEIFEL TRUSTEES PROP. MGMT PAID AFTE 60 Enterprise CARRIER CORP Labor&parts to repair HVAC unit at BRO bldg (4.5 hrs) 1,266.50 Fund 60 Enterprise CARRIER CORP Labor to repair chemical feed bldg heater(1.5 hrs) 270.00 Fund 60 Enterprise CARRIER CORP Labor to repair HVAC in Lab bldg(2 hrs) 335.00 Fund 60 Enterprise CARRIER CORP Service maintenance agreement for Admin bldg Aug 132.50 Fund 2020 60 Enterprise CLINT&JANEENE GALBRAITH REFUND WT/S/T: 3302 N GAVIOLA AVE PROP. MGMT 45.11 Fund &TITLE PAID FI 60 Enterprise COASTLINE EQUIPMENT COMPANY John Deere Excavator, Plate Compactor,Gem Prep 570.35 Fund Academy Main 60 Enterprise COLUMBIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY Replacement door for control panel in Mechanical bldg 229.98 Fund (1 city 60 Enterprise COLUMBIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY VFD for post air blower 2 electrical upgrade(1 city) 8,380.00 Fund 60 Enterprise COLUMBINE CONTROL CO. Thermocoupler to repair PLC, rack 2,at waste gas 2,520.66 Fund burner(1 60 Enterprise CONDOC No PO Multiple Projects.Condoc services to 7/31/20 73.99 Fund 60 Enterprise CORE&MAIN LP 8in&10in Stem&Spring,Qty 8 2,370.22 Fund 60 Enterprise CORE&MAIN LP Brass Bushing, Nipple,Cla-Val Repair Kit,Qty 13 229.82 Fund 60 Enterprise CORE&MAIN LP Clow Rebuild Kit, Brass Nipple, Brass Union,Qty it 520.85 Fund 60 Enterprise CSS GROUP Translore License,Tickets x1450 282.29 Fund Date:8/18/20 01:18:13 PM Page:7 Page 502 Item#14. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise CUE'S INC Adapter tool for traction(4 city) 1,066.45 Fund 60 Enterprise CUE'S INC Replacement parts for CCTV Van 2 camera(7 city) 593.95 Fund 60 Enterprise D&B SUPPLY 24in x 84in Aluminum Screen,Qyt 1,WO#303249 5.99 Fund 60 Enterprise D&B SUPPLY Adapter&container cap(2 city) 28.98 Fund 60 Enterprise D&B SUPPLY Combo Locks for Well 30&16,Qty 2 33.98 Fund 60 Enterprise D&B SUPPLY Magnetic Tray, 3in Drive Ext,gin Pliers,Qty 4 69.76 Fund 60 Enterprise DAVID&SAMANTHA GATALETTO REFUND WT/S/T: 1619 N LAUDERHILL AVE TITLE 48.89 Fund COMPANY OVERPAID 60 Enterprise DC ENGINEERING Arc flash update for Oaks lift station 105.00 Fund 60 Enterprise DIGLINE, INC. Digline Tickets,July 2020,Qty 1,441 2,620.80 Fund 60 Enterprise E.H.WACHS COMPANY Repair Wachs Controller,Qty 1 221.50 Fund 60 Enterprise EL-ADA, INC. El-Ada July 2020 Services Qty.6 42.00 Fund 60 Enterprise ENVIRONMENTAL EXPRESS,INC. Disposalbe watch glass(lpk) 162.45 Fund 60 Enterprise ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER Cradlepoint installation re-wire on CCTV Van 1 339.79 Fund SERVICES,INC. 60 Enterprise ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER Cradlepoint installation re-wire on CCTV Van 2 339.79 Fund SERVICES,INC. 60 Enterprise EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL LLC PO#20-0007,Compliance DBP Sampling,WO#GP21111 675.00 Fund 60 Enterprise EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL LLC PO#20-0007,Compliance Sampling @ Well 11 105.00 Fund 60 Enterprise EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL LLC PO#20-0007,Compliance Sampling @ Well 20b&16b 210.00 Fund 60 Enterprise EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL LLC PO#20-0019,OCCT Pilot Study @ Well 19 480.00 Fund 60 Enterprise EVOQUA WATER TECHNOLOGIES,LLC. Lab DI water maintenance agreement 1,181.43 Fund 60 Enterprise FASTENAL COMPANY 36in Cable Ties,Well 20b Upgrade,Qty 50 25.98 Fund Date:8/18/20 01:18:13 PM Page:8 Page 503 Item#14. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise FASTENAL COMPANY Hydropellant gloves(12 city) 52.11 Fund 60 Enterprise FEHR BROS. INDUSTRIES Grab link cable&chain to pull center mixers on new 1,331.53 Fund A/Bs 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. 3/4in SS Ball Valve,l/2in,3/4in Blue Monster Tape,Qty 359.62 Fund 9 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. 6 SBR MI IPS Trans Gasket,Qty 1 7.32 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. 8 DI C110 125# Bind Fig,Qty 1,WO#303262 121.91 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. Blue Monster Tape,Valve/Diaphragm Kit,Qty 9 633.18 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. Brass Nipple, Brass Thread,Strip,Qty 9,WO#304679 368.16 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. Gasket, Flange Pkg,Qty 3 48.60 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. Meter Vault,8in Flange,Qty 5 275.31 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. Packout Backpack for Backlfow Supplies,Qty 1 119.99 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. Pit Lid Housing for MXU,Qty 15 498.35 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. PO#20-0052, 1 1/2in Omni C2 Water Meters,Qty 1 1,351.23 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. PO#20-0052, lin,3/4in Water Meters,Qty 113 15,924.86 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. PO#20-0052, lin,3/4in,2in C2 Water Meters,Qty 97 17,738.56 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. PO#20-0052,2in Omni T2, 2in Omni C2 Water Meters, 37,200.48 Fund Qty 25 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. PO#20-0052,2in T2,4in T2 Water Meters,Qty 2 3,759.12 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. PO#20-0052,Single&Dual Port MXU's,Qty 81 14,679.90 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. PO#20-0309,3/4in Accustream Water Meters,Qty 557 76,966.26 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. PO#20-0309,4in Omni T2,Qty 1, May Capital Order 2,615.00 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. PO#20-0309,Single&Dual Port MXU,June Capital, 19,756.17 Fund Qty 108 Date:8/18/20 01:18:13 PM Page:9 Page 504 Item#14. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. Safety plug covers for portable generator(4 city) 15.38 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. Slip Valve Box Bottom Section,Qty 2 107.48 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. Slip Valve Box Bottom Section,Qty 6 322.45 Fund 60 Enterprise FISHER SCIENTIFIC Gloves-Small(1 cs) 46.72 Fund 60 Enterprise FISHER SCIENTIFIC Gloves-Med&Lg(2 cs) 93.44 Fund 60 Enterprise FISHER SCIENTIFIC Salicylic acid (2 city) 440.68 Fund 60 Enterprise GARY&BEVERLY FOX REFUND WT/S/T: 2974 N BLUE SPRINGS AVE TITLE 31.28 Fund CO. OVERPAID 60 Enterprise GIESLER'S AUTO REPAIR Oil Change,C13732,WO#304641 50.53 Fund 60 Enterprise GIESLER'S AUTO REPAIR Oil Change,02 Sensor Replacement,C11987, 359.18 Fund WO#284538,305501 60 Enterprise GRAINGER Chlorine Test Strips,Qty 7 76.02 Fund 60 Enterprise GRAINGER Pump for RAS/WAS station(2 city) 147.42 Fund 60 Enterprise H.D. FOWLER COMPANY Brass Adapter,Insert Stiffener,Qty 32 93.92 Fund 60 Enterprise H.D. FOWLER COMPANY Flange Repair Kit,0-Ring,Thrust Ring,Gasket,Qty 20 616.69 Fund 60 Enterprise H.D. FOWLER COMPANY Meter Re-Setter, Meter Setter,Qty 6 1,650.92 Fund 60 Enterprise HACH COMPANY Chlorine Total Reagent Set,Qty 3 180.09 Fund 60 Enterprise HACH COMPANY CL17 Tubing Kit,Qty 2 165.28 Fund 60 Enterprise HACH COMPANY Dissolved Iron,Total Alknty,PH Chemkey,Cell Ong Kit 297.93 Fund Qty 12 60 Enterprise HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 10'Ladder for Well 22,Qty 1 199.00 Fund 60 Enterprise HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES PVC Pipe,El,Adptr,Clmp,Well 20b Upgrade,WO#303249 80.45 Fund 60 Enterprise HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Spray Paint, Bolts,Well 20b Upgrade,WO#303249 8.72 Fund Date:8/18/20 01:18:13 PM Page:10 Page 505 Item#14. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise HYDRO INTERNATIONAL Grit snail spare parts(20 qty) 4,803.53 Fund WASTEWATER,INC 60 Enterprise IDAHO MATERIALS&CONSTRUCTION Asphalt for Hickory Rd Repair,WO#299703 29.06 Fund 60 Enterprise IDAHO STATE INSURANCE FUND #36670,Workers Comp Payroll Premium 33,694.66 Fund 4/1/20-6/30/20- 60 Enterprise IDAHO TOOL&EQUIPMENT Ext 1 Dr 7 IMP,Skt Retain 1 Dr Tools for C20663 98.82 Fund 60 Enterprise INTERMOUNTAIN GAS 0981623008 July 2020 1,533.00 Fund 60 Enterprise INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER 6v lantern&C batteries(3 qty) 17.11 Fund 60 Enterprise INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER Rechargeable 12V 9AH battery(1 qty) 28.95 Fund 60 Enterprise JEFFERY&LISA SCEIRINE REFUND WT/S/T: 2176 W JAYTON DR TITLE 36.46 Fund COMPANY OVERPAID 60 Enterprise JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE 20-0054, 20-0261 Fire Alarm Monitoring at Various 80.83 Fund PROTECTION LP Buildings 60 Enterprise JOHNSTONE SUPPLY Start cap for collections HVAC unit(1 qty) 3.06 Fund 60 Enterprise KEVEN&SILVIA HOPE REFUND WT/S/T: 440 E CHATEAU DR TITLE 89.97 Fund COMPANY OVERPAID 60 Enterprise LAWN CO MAINTENANCE PO#20-0223, Lawn Care for Well Sites august service 3,200.00 Fund 60 Enterprise LOWE'S Asphalt quick patch&ratchet straps(6 qty) 136.31 Fund 60 Enterprise MARK ANDERSON REIMBURSE M.ANDERSON CLASS A DRIVE LIC. 100.00 Fund CLASS A TEMP. PERMI 60 Enterprise MATERIALS TESTING&INSPECTION 20-0322 Sidestream Phos Recovery Svc to 7/18/20 7,291.12 Fund 60 Enterprise McCALL INDUSTRIAL Ball valve, plug,&bushing (16 qty) 202.04 Fund 60 Enterprise MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY Clamps for transducer mount at parshal flume(9 qty) 206.05 Fund 60 Enterprise METROQUIP,INC. Overhaul kits for hose nozzles on hydrocleaners(2 qty) 332.40 Fund 60 Enterprise MINUTEMAN,INC. Install New Cliq Lock @ Well 21,WO#GP21125 105.00 Fund 60 Enterprise MINUTEMAN, INC. New key made for PIP07,C20519 tool box-P.Cotten 13.50 Fund Date:8/18/20 01:18:13 PM Page:11 Page 506 Item#14. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise MINUTEMAN,INC. Spare Shop Keys,Qty 6 17.00 Fund 60 Enterprise MONTE HARMON REFUND WT/S/T: 1852 E CHALLIS DR CUSTOMER 30.14 Fund PAID AFTER CLOSING 60 Enterprise MOTION &FLOW CONTROL PRODUCTS Garden Hose, Brass Bushing, Pressure Test Kits,Qty 11 93.47 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Banding for shop use(1 city) 47.38 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Black Marking Paint,Qty 12 83.88 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Fan for HVAC unit at Fermentation bldg (1 city) 26.46 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Multi-pleat HVAC filters(10 city) 592.90 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Pump&filter to repair system UV bulb washer(3 city) 704.28 Fund 60 Enterprise MURAR ENGINEERING&DESIGN Inspection of Bay Door For Structural Repairs, 450.00 Fund WO#305742 60 Enterprise MYFLEETCENTER.COM Oil Change,C13726,WO#298356 51.18 Fund 60 Enterprise MYFLEETCENTER.COM Oil Change,C14312,WO#299693 35.27 Fund 60 Enterprise MYFLEETCENTER.COM Oil Change,C20028,WO#304660 70.78 Fund 60 Enterprise NAPA AUTO PARTS 6 jugs of washer fluid for PW inspector's vehicles 16.14 Fund 60 Enterprise NAPA AUTO PARTS Original Grip Gloves,Qty 1 14.99 Fund 60 Enterprise NAPA AUTO PARTS Windshield Washer Fluid,Qty 2 5.38 Fund 60 Enterprise NATHAN&ARIANE MCARDLE REFUND WT/S/T: 946 W EGRET DR TITLE COMPANY 89.75 Fund OVERPAID 60 Enterprise NICHOLAS&AMANDA PAIGE REFUND WT/S/T: 1521 E SICILY ST TITLE COMPANY 139.84 Fund OVERPAID 60 Enterprise NORCO Class III Hi Vis Shirt,C.Ambroz,Qty 2 28.62 Fund 60 Enterprise NORCO First Aid Kits,Qty 4 74.25 Fund 60 Enterprise NORCO Plasma Cutter Parts,Qty 1 164.31 Fund Date:8/18/20 01:18:13 PM Page:12 Page 507 Item#14. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise NORCO Refund for Returned Hi Vis Shirt,J. Cole, (28.62) Fund INV#29410089 60 Enterprise O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Detailer to clean vehicles(1 city) 4.99 Fund 60 Enterprise O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Scratch-fix for Collections truck C21222(1 city) 16.99 Fund 60 Enterprise O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Wash&wax to clean vehicles(1 city) 5.79 Fund 60 Enterprise OFFICE DEPOT,INC. 24 pk of 3x3 colored sticky notes,24pk of 1.5x2 sticky 18.21 Fund notes 60 Enterprise OFFICE DEPOT,INC. 24pk of 3x3 sticky notes for PW,2 dzn gel pens for B. 11.89 Fund Young 60 Enterprise OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Finance&MUBS Supply Refill-Velcro Tape Badge 18.12 Fund Holders Pen 60 Enterprise OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY Labor&parts to replace board&3 button station(1.5 470.40 Fund hrs) 60 Enterprise OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY Labor&parts to replace photo eyes on door at filter 286.90 Fund bldg 60 Enterprise OXARC,INC. Phosphate 55 gl Drum 1,823.00 Fund 60 Enterprise OXARC,INC. PO#20-0022,Sodium Hypochlorite,Well 22,19, 1800gl 3,042.00 Fund 60 Enterprise OXARC,INC. PO#20-0342,Sodium Hypochlorite Well 27,19,20, 1,735.00 Fund 1000gl 60 Enterprise OXARC,INC. PO#20-0342,Sodium Hypochlorite,Well 6,771.20 Fund 27,19,20,16,25,28,22,21 60 Enterprise PENN VALLEY PUMP CO Pressure switch for inventory(1 city) 816.50 Fund 60 Enterprise POWER SYSTEMS WEST PO#20-0015,Generator Maintenance @ Well 23, 296.40 Fund WO#303242 60 Enterprise PRECISION EQUIPMENT REPAIR Labor&parts to repair fuel pump on CCTV Van 2 590.36 Fund 60 Enterprise PRECISION EQUIPMENT REPAIR Labor to repair air leak on hose reel on camel 358.72 Fund hydrocleaner 60 Enterprise REPUBLIC SERVICES-TRANSFER Biosolids dsposal for July 2020 13,520.76 Fund STATION 60 Enterprise RICOH USA,INC C86232612 C86232690 B/W&Color Pages ENV&PW 179.74 Fund Printers 60 Enterprise RICOH USA,INC C86234082 b/w(1,781 city)&color(767 city)images 62.15 Fund Date:8/18/20 01:18:13 PM Page:13 Page 508 Item#14. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise RICOH USA,INC C86236263 b/w(240 qty)&color(505 qty) images 33.28 Fund 60 Enterprise RICOH USA,INC C86242095 b/w(650 qty)&color(926 qty) images 51.63 Fund 60 Enterprise RICOH USA,INC SN#C86250182, Black&White,Color Copies,Qty 6,517 161.28 Fund 60 Enterprise ROCKY MOUNTAIN VALVES& lin&2in Air Vacs, Ustick Valve Installs,Qty 3 590.00 Fund AUTOMATIONS,INC. 60 Enterprise ROCKY MOUNTAIN VALVES& lin Av-Tek Combo Air Vac/Vent Valve,Well 20 Upgrade 165.00 Fund AUTOMATIONS,INC. 60 Enterprise ROCKY MOUNTAIN VALVES& 4 valve for repairs at post aeration basin 2(1 qty) 203.52 Fund AUTOMATIONS,INC. 60 Enterprise RYAN&KRISTEN SPURLIN REFUND WT/S/T: 45 W ARNEZ ST TITLE COMPANY 90.73 Fund OVERPAID 60 Enterprise SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP 20-0162 Annual Elevator Service Contract To 9/30 for 1,170.00 Fund WW 60 Enterprise SHERON MULANIX REFUND WT/S/T: 1859 E GLENLOCH ST TITLE 89.10 Fund COMPANY OVERPAID 60 Enterprise SHRED-IT USA, LLC. Finance,Clerks, MUBS July 2020 Shredding 57.75 Fund 60 Enterprise SIGNS, ETC Magentic Sign for Shop Door,Qty 2 73.72 Fund 60 Enterprise SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY Blue,Green Marking Paint,Qty 48 190.08 Fund 60 Enterprise SPECIALTY PLASTICS&FAB,INC Nipple,tee,&CPVC cement coating (9 qty) 57.02 Fund 60 Enterprise SPECIALTY PLASTICS&FAB,INC Parts for Well 20 Booster Drain Lines,Qty 151, 288.85 Fund WO#303249 60 Enterprise SPF WATER ENGINEERING, LLC 20-0091 Design Test Well 9B Services to 7/31/20 15,016.73 Fund 60 Enterprise STRIVE WORKPLACE SOLUTIONS Coffee for Water Dept,Qty 1 11.99 Fund 60 Enterprise SULLIVAN REBERGER PO#20-0003-August 2020 Lobbying Fees 3,000.00 Fund 60 Enterprise T-ZERS SHIRT SHOP,INC City embroidery on hi-vis shirts for SPetty 39.00 Fund 60 Enterprise TATES RENTS(GENERAL OFFICE) Propane for forklift(16.5) 52.64 Fund 60 Enterprise TELANSWER,INC After Hours Service,8/1/20-8/31/20 162.70 Fund Date:8/18/20 01:18:13 PM Page:14 Page 509 Item#14. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise TestAmerica Laboratories,Inc(dba Biosolids sample analysis(13 tests) 876.50 Fund Eurofins) 60 Enterprise TestAmerica Laboratories,Inc(dba IPDES sample analysis 485.00 Fund Eurofins) 60 Enterprise TestAmerica Laboratories,Inc(dba IPDES sample analysis(3 tests) 970.00 Fund Eurofins) 60 Enterprise TestAmerica Laboratories,Inc(dba NO PO Eng Water FY20 E. Ridge Well Lab Svc to 703.50 Fund Eurofins) 7/29/20 60 Enterprise THE UPS STORE#2586 IPDES sample shipping 180.41 Fund 60 Enterprise THE UPS STORE#2586 Shipping to return pump core to PVP 41.89 Fund 60 Enterprise TIMOTHY&HANNAH PETERSEN REFUND WT/S/T: 3835 W SEA ISLAND CT AUTO-PAY 215.51 Fund PROCESSED AFTER 60 Enterprise UGSI CHEMICAL FEED INC Part to repair dewatering bldg polymer blending pump 1,500.69 Fund (1 city) 60 Enterprise ULINE,INC. Heavy Duty Handwrapper,Qty 1 107.32 Fund 60 Enterprise ULINE,INC. Reclosable Bags,Qty 1 98.68 Fund 60 Enterprise ULINE,INC. Returned magnetic tape-ordered wrong size(2 rl) (26.41) Fund 60 Enterprise UNITED OIL Oil for clarifiers 500hr breaking oil change(35 qty) 1,256.85 Fund 60 Enterprise USA BLUEBOOK Blue,Orange,Green Marking Paint,PVC Threaded Tee, 785.21 Fund Qty15 60 Enterprise USA BLUEBOOK Green Marking Paint,Car Wash,Wax, Brush,Ext 352.68 Fund Pole,Qty8 60 Enterprise USA BLUEBOOK Pressure Flow Gauges,Qty 6 508.46 Fund 60 Enterprise USA BLUEBOOK Progrip Long Pick Set,Qty 1 118.21 Fund 60 Enterprise USA BLUEBOOK Red Marking Paint,Qty 4 28.09 Fund 60 Enterprise USA BLUEBOOK Screw Set Vacuum Breaker Valve,Blue,Prpl Mrkng 679.47 Fund Pnt,Qty15 60 Enterprise USA BLUEBOOK Static mixer(1 qty) 135.76 Fund 60 Enterprise VARSITY FACILITY SERVICES 20-0087 City-wide Janitorial Services to 7/31/20 1,952.46 Fund Date:8/18/20 01:18:13 PM Page:15 Page 510 Item#14. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise WESTERN STATES EQUIPMENT CO Labor&parts to repair screw sucker pump 1,942.38 Fund 60 Enterprise WEX BANK INC #0496-00-332449-8, 7/31/2020_WEX Fuel 6,323.20 Fund 60 Enterprise XEROX CORPORATION- PASADENA 8TB570607 b/w(183 city)&color(617 city)images 31.77 Fund 60 Enterprise XEROX CORPORATION- PASADENA 8TB576316 b/w(2,074 city)&color(448 city) images 32.77 Fund Total 60 Enterprise 493,224.46 Fund Report Total 1,403,173.98 Date:8/18/20 01:18:13 PM Page:16 Page 511 Item#15. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Mayor's Office: CARES Act Municipal Small Business Grant Program Page 512 Item#15. Mayor Robert E. Simison EIDIAN � g City Council Members: g Tre Bernt Brad Hoa lun Joe Borton Jessica Perreault U H ri V Luke Cavener Liz Strader MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor& City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Miles, Chief of Staff DATE: August 18, 2020 SUBJECT: CARES Act Municipal Small Business Grant Program With the State's approval in July allowing municipalities the use of CARES Act allocated funds for small business support, the City is recommending implementation of a municipal small business grant program(SBGP). The objective of this program is to utilize a portion of the CARES Act funding that has been allocated to the City of Meridian to provide support to small business in Meridian that need financial support due to, and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, $1,025,000 of CARES Act funding allocated to Meridian is recommended to be set aside for this program so that the City can establish minimal administrative costs, and award grants of up to $10,000 with an additional one-time $5,000 award to small businesses within Meridian. The attached snapshot sheet identifies the high level needs, assumptions and recommendations of the program, and the attached draft program manual provides specific program elements that are recommended for proposed users of this program. This material will be presented for consideration during the August 25, 2020 Council workshop. Mayor's Office . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 301, Meridian, ID 83642 Page 513 Phone 208-489-0529 . Fax 208-888-6854 . www.meridiancity.org Item#15. DRAFT Mayor Robert E. Simison E IDIA N �� g City Council Members: g Tre Bernt Brad Hoa lun Joe Borton Jessica Perreault U H ri V Luke Cavener Liz Strader Meridian Municipal Small Business Grant Application 1.0 INTRODUCTION Welcome to the Meridian Municipal Small Business Grant Program(MSBG). This program is in guided under the Idaho Rebounds Municipal Business Grant application. This grant is made possible through the work of Governor Brad Little, State Controller Brandon Woolf,The Association of Idaho Cities,the Idaho Association of Counties,your county leadership,and the US CARES Act. The Governor's Coronavirus Financial Advisory Committee (CFAC)created this grant to help local businesses and organizations affected by COVID-19 pandemic, enabling cities and counties to provide aid within their community. This program is a grant for small businesses/organizations with less than 500 employees (see section 2.2 below). This document outlines program guidelines,instructions for submitting an application,information needed and timelines for disbursement. All applications must be submitted through Meridian's On-Line Neighborly system. Applications will be processed on first come first served basis until funds run out. Link here to the portal for the Neighborly software system. 2.0 PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS Eligible businesses/organizations may be awarded up to an initial maximum of$10,000 in grant funds through the MSBG application process,with up to an additional one-time funding of$5,000 pending certain requirements are met as described herein. Businesses and organizations must have a qualified business or organizational interruption or expense caused by COVID- 19 related incidents or decisions, including but not limited to local closure orders,need for personal protective equipment, social distancing requirements, increased costs, disrupted supply network, etc. • Business/Organization closed or interrupted pursuant to a local health district or local government decision made on or after June 20,2020. • Business/Organization was not otherwise not eligible for a state small business grant(e.g. businesses created on or after January 1,2020, etc.). • Business/Organization that have specific PPE needs in order to operate safely. • Business/Organization has not received funds for the current purpose by other COVID-19 grant programs. • Adverse effects and expenses planned for the use of the grant must occur between June 20, 2020 and December 31,2020. • Business/Organization does not exist for the purpose of advancing partisan political activities or the business does not directly lobby federal or state officials,defined as having had a registered lobbyist at any point during 2020. • Business Business/Organization must be in good standing and not federally debarred from receiving funds. Meridian Municipal Grant Program Page 1 of 9 page 514 tterr,#15. DRAFT • Business/Organization is not currently in bankruptcy. • Business/Organization is current with property taxes,or has a payment plan in place with County. • Business/Organization is located in City of Meridian city limits. • Business/Organization liability insurance is in place by date of executed agreement and sub-recipient agreement. • Business/Organization is registered with IRS and Idaho Business Registration Secretary of State. • Business/Organization employs 100 or fewer employees(See section 2.2 below). • Business/Organization has valid SS#,EIN&DUNS. • Applicants will review and sign and date Conflict Interest Form(Appendix A)and Sub-Recipient Grant Agreement(Appendix B). *Business are eligible to apply for this program if they were eligible to apply for other State of Idaho programs and chose not to apply. 2.1 PROGRAM SERVICE AREA This program is available to businesses and organizations registered and located within the City of Meridian jurisdictional boundaries. The location of the business/organization will be considered the place of business administration and registration address. Funds will not be provided to businesses/organizations registered or located outside of City of Meridian jurisdictional boundaries. 2.2 ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS • Business/Organization that has 100 or fewer employees. o Only businesses with 100 or fewer employees will be eligible for the first two weeks from the start date (Sept. 1,2020) of this program. o Businesses with 101-250 employees will become eligible for funding after September 15,2020. o All Small Businesses(those with fewer than 500 employees)will be eligible from Oct.1,2020 until the close of this program. • Eligible applicants must have a registered business address in the City of Meridian jurisdictional boundaries. • Business/Organization closed or interrupted pursuant to a local health district or local government decision made on or after June 20,2020. • Business/Organization was not otherwise eligible for a state small business grant(e.g. businesses created on or after January 1, 2020, etc.). • Businesses/Organizations that have specific PPE needs in order to operate safely. • Business/Organizations must have a qualified business interruption or expense caused by COVID-19 related incidents or decisions, including but not limited to local closure orders,need for personal protective equipment, social distancing requirements, increased costs, disrupted supply network, etc. 2.3 INELIGIBLE APPLICANTS • An ineligible existing business/organization applicant is one that has a physical business location or registration outside of the City of Meridian jurisdictional boundary. • An ineligible applicant is a business/organization with more than 500 employees including the owner. (See section 2.2 above for when businesses large than 100 employees may apply.) • Ineligible applicants include businesses/organizations which received funds for the current purpose by other COVID-19 grant programs. 2.4 ELIGIBLE USE OF FUNDS The City of Meridian Economic Development Administration will oversee the project scope of work submitted in applications. The following items are eligible expenses under the MSBG program: • Operating capital for leasing space, insurance and/or utilities, staff salaries [barring owner salaries] or expense Meridian Municipal Grant Program Page 2 of 9 page 515 tterr,#15. DRAFT caused by COVID-19 related incidents or decisions,including but not limited to local closure orders,need for personal protective equipment, social distancing requirements, increased costs,disrupted supply network, etc. • COVID-19 related expenditures to purchase inventory, supplies, accounting and inventory software,PPE, furniture,fixtures,and equipment. • Rehabilitation of owner-occupied or leased space to support social distancing or safety measures to combat COVID-19. • City Council may,under necessary Ordinance changes,waive permit fees for such improvements. • Equipment purchase(with or without installation costs)to support social distancing or safety measures to combat COVID-19. • Cleaning and sanitation supplies to adhere to CDC guidelines for disinfecting spaces. • Other adjustments required to adhere to COVID-19 social distancing standards. • Purchase of PPE for employees or customers. • Testing costs for employees for COVID-19. Applicants will submit receipts and invoices, and documentation of eligible expenses on a monthly basis to the Meridian Economic Development staff. Final documentation must be received by January 15,2020. Provide staff contact information here. 2.5 INELIGIBLE USE OF FUNDS • Funds received pursuant to this certification cannot be used for expenditures for purposes which an entity has received funding from any other emergency COVID-19 grant programs; • Pay off non-business debt, such as personal credit cards for purchases not associated with the business. • Purchase personal expenses such as buying a new family car or making repairs to a participant's home. • Direct financing to political activities or paying off taxes and fines. • Purchase personal items or support other businesses in which the borrower may have an interest. Furthermore, funding recipients may not shift more than 10%of total project budget from one budget category to another without written approval from the City. 2.6 APPLICANT CAPACITY The Economic Development Administration will confirm that the business and the applicant(s)possess the capacity to execute the project proposal to be successful with the use of the funds. 3.0 PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION The Economic Development Administration will: • Originate the Municipal Business Grants • Market the Municipal Business Grant program • Accept and process applications • Review grant requests • Ensure a timely grant review and disbursement of funds • Maintain grant files and fiscal records • Administer grants used to fund this program • Ensure compliance with program guidelines 3.1 GRANT PAYMENTS The duties of Economic Development Administration staff will include the following: • Coordinate processing of grant payments,and general accounting in city and federal databases Meridian Municipal Grant Program Page 3 of 9 page 516 Item#15. DRAFT • Reporting all grant payments and appropriate Grantee staff • Obtain grant reimbursements requests from the applicant Conflict of Interest: As such,no member of the governing body and no official, employee or agent of the local government,nor any other person who exercises policy or decision-making responsibilities in connection with the planning and implementation of the program shall directly or indirectly be eligible for this program. The City of Meridian will require applicants to certify that a conflict of interest does not exist with the business or applicant. (See Appendix A) 3.2 DISBURSEMENT Funds will be disbursed according to the following plan: Upon approval and execution of grant agreement 50%of the project funds award will be provided within 14 business days. Upon receiving a completed and accepted financial report that meets program standards including proper supporting documentation required, and upon completion of one business coaching session and recommendation from business coaching professionals,the remainder 50%of the project funds will be provided within 14 business days. Should the applicant request the allowable additional, one-time funding of$5,000,this will be awarded after sufficient reporting of expenses has been made,provided, and reviewed to the Economic Development Administration. Business coaching services will be coordinated by the Economic Development Administration and in partnership with Meridian Chamber of Commerce member organizations, SBDC representatives,or IWBC representatives with business accounting experience. City staff will review invoice requests and initiate the reimbursement payment process. Applicants shall submit receipts and invoices,and documentation of eligible expenses on a bi-monthly basis until all proceeds have been expended. 4.0 PROGRAM OPERATIONS 4.1 APPLICANT CONFIDENTIALITY All personal and business financial information will be kept confidential to the extent permitted by law. Participant files with personal and business confidential information will be kept in locked, secured storage units. The name of the business and the amount of grant funds received maybe identified on the transparent.idaho.gov website and on the City of Meridian's Economic Development webpage. 4.2 DISPUTE RESOLUTION/APPEALS PROCEDURE Applicants whose applications are not selected or not deemed eligible have the right to appeal the decision of the City, limited solely to procedural errors in the selection process. In the event that no such procedural errors are found to have occurred,the decision of the City shall be final. An aggrieved applicant may,within seven(7)business days after the selection of prospective eligible projects, appeal in writing based on procedural errors. The appeal must state all facts and arguments upon which the appeal is based. The Chief Financial Officer for the City of Meridian, or the Economic Development Administrator,will review the applicant's application, and the facts which form the basis for the appeal, and render a written decision within thirty(30)business days of the receipt of the appeal. Applicants may resubmit one additional application for re-consideration if originally denied 4.3 APPLICATION TIMELINES Applications will be first come first served Contracts for approved grant applications will be drafted by City staff and circulated for signatures to the applicant and Mayor's Office . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642 Page 517 Phone 208-489-0529 . Fax 208-884-8119 . www.meridiancity.org ttem#�5. DRAFT City Economic Development Administrator. Required Back-Up Documentation for Reimbursement of Expenses using Municipal Grant Payroll Information-Please provide one of the following: IRS Filings; Idaho Department of Labor Withholdings; Third Party Payroll records. Expenses-Please provide the following as appropriately determined by the Economic Development Administration: Third Party Invoices; Mortgage/Lease Information; Construction Estimates/Bids; Other documentation as approved. Mayor's Office . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642 Page 518 Phone 208-489-0529 . Fax 208-884-8119 . www.meridiancity.org Item#15. DRAFT Application for Meridian Municipal Small Business Grant Program Business/Organization Name: Business/Organization EIN#/SSN: Business/Organization DUNS: Applicant Name: Business/Organization Address: Business Phone: Applicant email: Project Summary 1. Experience/Organizational Capacity: provide a brief narrative on the types of activities undertaken by the organization for which funding is requested. Describe the experience and expertise of the individuals who will be responsible for the activities and management of the project funding. 2. Please provide narrative on how COVID-19 has directly impacted your business/organization operations?How does your business use PPE in daily operations? 3. How much funding is being requested? $ 4. How many employees do you employ? 5. What industry is your business/organization in? Project Budget Summary and Financials 1.Please Provide: • 2019 Profit and Loss Statement • 2020 Year to Date Profit and Loss Statements • 2019 and 2020 Annual Budget documents • 2020 Year to Date Balance 2. Project Budget Budget Line Item Source: Item#1 Item#2 Item#3 Item#4 Item#5 Total Mayor's Office . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642 Page 519 Phone 208-489-0529 . Fax 208-884-8119 . www.meridiancity.org ttem#�5. DRAFT 3. Has the business or its owner applied for assistance through the Small Business Administration,Federal Emergency Management Program,or State of Idaho COVID-19 loan or grant program?If so,list below.If the business or its owner applies for such assistance or receives an award after the date of its application or award from the Small Business Relief Fund,it must immediately disclose such application and/or award. Program/Agency Date of Amount of Purpose of Application Amount Application Application of Award 4. I understand the State of Idaho will rely on this application and certifications as a material representation in making a disbursement of funds to the applying entity. 5. I certify the following: I. The grant's use is for necessary expenditures incurred due to the public health emergency with respect to the Coronavirus Disease 2019(COVID-19), including local closure orders; II. Expenses have been incurred during the period that begins on June 20, 2020,and ends on December 31,2020,or my businesses/organization did not qualify for previous CARES Act funding; 111. The grant funds use has not been covered or reimbursed by any other federal or state grant. Funds received pursuant to this certification cannot be used for expenditures for which an entity has received funding from any other emergency COVID-19 or other federal and state funds; IV. That no owner of 20%or more of the business is incarcerated, on parole,or within the last 5 years for any felony has been convicted,pleaded guilty,pleaded nolo contendere,or been placed on any form of probation? V. Funds provided from the State of Idaho pursuant to this certification must adhere to official federal guidance issued or to be issued on what constitutes a necessary expenditure. Any funds used in any manner that does not adhere to official federal guidance shall be returned to the State of Idaho. VI. Any business/organizations receiving funds pursuant to this certification shall retain documentation of all uses of the funds,including but not limited to invoices and/or sales receipts. Such documentation shall be produced to the State of Idaho if requested. Additionally,uniform reports may be requested and if requested shall be provided to the State of Idaho to ensure the receipt, disbursement, and use of federal funds is in alignment with federal law. VII. All grants submitted through this portal and approved by the committee will be reported publicly on Transparent.ldaho.gov. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure the protection of sensitive data prior to the data being submitted for review by CFAC. I understand and it is my intent to conduct and process this application by electronic means and providing my signature by electronic means below satisfies all legal effect and enforceability as required by applicable law. I therefore, certify that all information submitted in this request is true and accurate. Signature: Date: Mayor's Office . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642 Page 520 Phone 208-489-0529 . Fax 208-884-8119 . www.meridiancity.org item#�5. DRAFT Attachment A Conflict of Interest No employee, officer, or agent shall participate in the selection, award,or administration of a contract supported by Federal funds if a real or apparent conflict of interest would be involved. Such a conflict would arise when an employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family,his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein,has a financial or other interest in the firm selected for an award. No person who is an employee, agent, consultant, officer, or elected official or appointed official of the recipient or subrecipient that are receiving federal funds and(1)who exercises or has exercised any functions or responsibilities with respect to activities assisted with federal funds; or(2)who is in a position to participate in a decision-making process or gain inside information with regard to these activities,may obtain a financial interest from a federally funded activity, or have any themselves or those with whom they have family or business ties, during their tenure or for one year thereafter. A. Are any employees, agents, consultants, officers, family members, or elected officials of the organization requesting funds in a position to participate in the decision-making process for approval of this application? ❑ Yes ❑ No B. Are any employees, agents, consultants, officers, family members, or elected officials of the organization requesting funds in a position to gain inside information regarding approval of this application? ❑ Yes ❑ No C. Will any employees,agents,consultants,officers, family members, or elected officials of the organization requesting funds obtain a financial interest or substantial benefit from this activity? ❑ Yes ❑ No D. Will any employee, agent, consultants, officers, family members,or elected officials of the organization requesting funds have any interest in any contract, subcontract or agreement with respect to funding this application, either for themselves or those with whom they have family or business ties during the life of the loan? ❑ Yes ❑ No If you answered yes to any of the above questions, a letter must be submitted with the application that includes the following information: 1) A disclosure of the nature and the extent of the conflict. 2) A description of how public disclosure will be made. 3) A qualified attorney's opinion that the conflict of interest does not violate federal, state, or local law. Signature/Authorized Representative Title Date Printed Name Signature/Authorized Official of the Board Title Date Printed Name Mayor's Office . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642 Page 521 Phone 208-489-0529 . Fax 208-884-8119 . www.meridiancity.org ttem#15. DRAFT Attachment B Sub-Recipient Agreement [TBD—Legal] Mayor's Office . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642 Page 522 Phone 208-489-0529 . Fax 208-884-8119 . www.meridiancity.org Item L#15.j Date: August 18, 2020 W IDIAN*-- Project: Municipal Small Business Grant ilA H O Owner: Dave Miles Dept.: Mayor's Office Project Evaluation Report Project: Municipal Small Business Grant Program Issue: Small businesses need support with ongoing business operations during COVID-19 pandemic. Budget: $1,000,000 initial (via CARES Act funding allocation) Schedule: Initiate program, Sept. 2020; Run through Dec. 2020 (pending updates to federal CARES Act criteria) Number of Meridian Small Businesses(2020): fderidiaTUrant Data Business Top Industries Funded via State COVID Grants in Count Meridian Estimate of Businesses in Meridian 3,482* Estimate of Small Businesses in Meridian (<100 emp.) 3,428* Accomodations/Food Svcs Estimated Prior CARES Act Recipients in Meridian —568** Retail *Based on ESMI statistics valid August 7, 2020 Finance **Based on transpa rent.idaho.gov valid August 10, 2020 Professional Technical Health Care Real Estate Other Construction 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% Projected Cost Overview: Options Totals Program Software Needs Software module build and use onto existing platform (Consider agency partnership option) $10,000.00 Consultant Needs Evaluate need of consultant to manage on monthly basis $15,000.00 Per MSBG Allocation One time allocation; one time plus monthly ongoing; monthly ongoing; ($10,000) $1,000,000.00 Total $1,025,000.00 DRAFT Page 523 Page 1 Item#15. Assumptions: • Software module build costs match estimates from agency partners (--$8-10K) • Consultant rate matches estimates from agency partners (-$15K) • Up front allocation not to exceed 50% of awarded funds • Require business coaching/consultation for prior to second half of awarded funding • Require Sub-recipient Agreements for all awarded funds Project Considerations: • Up to 100 businesses can qualify for assistance at a one-time allocation of$10,000 • Up to 66 businesses can qualify for assistance at a on-time$10,000 allocation, with one additional $5,000/mo. draw • Up to 40 businesses can qualify for assistance at a on-time$10,000 allocation, with additional $5,000/mo. draws thereafter • Up to 25 businesses can qualify for assistance at monthly draw of$10,000 • Risks: o City responsibility for ineligible use of funds o Quality control of consultant o Customer satisfaction of grant awards Recommendations: • Allocate $1,000,000 to actual grant program (exclusive of software and consultant needs) • Require business coaching for portion of allocated funds to be received • Require sub-recipient agreements • Set per allocation model to 1-time, plus one additional draw Current Efforts: • Review concept w/Council • Submit program for pre-approval to State Coronavirus Financial Advisory Committee (CFAC) • Hire consultant • Issue PO and task order for software module build • Develop Sub-recipient agreement • Develop application process and necessary forms, etc. Next Month Targets: • Implement program and open application period • Marketing efforts DRAFT Page 524 Page 2 Item#16. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Community Development: Update on Ada County Highway District's North Meridian Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Page 525 Item#16. C� fIEN , IN4, IDAHG-. MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Caleb Hood Meeting Date: August, 25 2020 Presenter: Edinson Bautista,ACHD Estimated Time: 12 minutes Topic: Update on ACHD North Meridian Bicycle &Pedestrian Plan Recommended Council Action: This is not an action item. Background: Staff has been participating on the ACHD team that is evaluating pedestrian and bicycle improvements for North Meridian. The ACHD Project Manager, will be at the August 25th Council Workshop to share information about the project, feedback received from the public and next steps. Page 526 Item#16. NORTH MERIDIAN NEIGHBORHOOD BIKE&PEDESTRIAN PUN-DRAFT PROJECT LIST 61 Black Cat Roatl,1-841 FmnMin Road Bicycle Notlh Mentlien Future Install Level 3 bike facilities along Black Cat Raad tram I-8J b Fmnkin Road B2 Black Cat Roa,Franklin Roatl/Cherry Lane Bicycle Notlh Mendien Future Install Leval 3 bike facilities slang Black Cat Roatl from Frenkdin Raad to CO"Lane B3 Black C.t Roatl,Cherry tens I UMick Roatl Birycle Notlh Mentlien Future Install Level 3 bike ecllitles along Black Cat Roatl from Cherry tens W Uatick Roatl B4 Black Cal Roatl,J-1,Roatl/MGv1111an Roatl Bicycle Notlh Mentlien Future Install Level 3 bike tac1dti along Black Cat Road fin, Ustick Roatl W McMillan Roatl B5 Black Cat Road,14C101I1hn Road I Chintlen Boulevard Birycle Notlh Mentlien Future Install Leval 3 bike facilities along Black Cat ROM!tram MCMI11an Road W Chintlen BoulevaM B6 Black Cat ROM,Chmdn BoulevaM/Highland Fall On. Bicycle Notlh MMndian Future Install Level 2 bike facilities slang Black Cat Road from Chintlen BoulevaM b Highland Fall Drive Install signing antl pavemeM making b exlsting Level 1 bike BT Black Cat-Ten Mile Bikeway,CM1erry lane/Uaick Roatl Birycle North Mendien Future -lidos along Me Black Cat-Ten Mike Bikeway from Cherry Lane to U-1,Road BB Can Atla Road USII&Roatl/MCMlllan Roatl Bicycle North Mentlien Future Install Leval 3 bike fac11111 slang Can Ada Road from Ustkk Roatl b MCMlllan Road B9 Can Ada Road,MCMI11an Road/Chinden Boulevard Birycle Notlh Mentlien Future Install Leval 3 bike facilities along Can Atla Road from MCMlllan Road W Chinden BoulevaM Install signing antl pavement markdng to existing Level 1 bike B10 Central Mendien Bikeway,Blue Heron Shael I Chintlen Boulevard BiryGa Notlh Mentlien Future fecilitree along the Mandan Blkaway from Blue Heron St b Chihd-inden Boulevard B11 Cherry Lane,MCD-0 Road/Black Cal Road Bicycle Notlh Mentlien Future Install Level 3 bike facilities along Cheery Lane kom MCDennod Road W Black Cal Road B12 Cherry Lane,Ten Mik Road I LiMO,Road Bicycle Notlh Mentlien Future Instull Leval 3 bike facilities along Cherry Lena from Ten Mile Road to Linder Roatl B13 Cherry Lena,Lintler Roatl I Mendien Roatl Birycle Notlh Mentlien Future Install Level 3 bike ecllitles along CO"Lane from Llntle, Road I.Mendien Roatl Install signing antl pavement matldng b existing Level 1 a1M Bid Chinden-MCMlllan Bikeway,Ten Mlle Road I SM—Dnva Bicycle Notlh Mendlan F,h. Level3 Dike facilities along the Chinden-MCMlllan Bikeway from Ten Mlle Roatl to Setlona Dnve Ins1a11 slgning antl pavement marking W existing Level 1 bike B15 El G.W Lena,McDermott Roatl/Black CeI Roatl BiryGa Notlh Mentlien Future facility aloW El G.Io Lane from McDermott Roatl b Bieck Cat Road 816 F—mAvenue.Mandan Roatl l Locust Grove Roatl Bicycle North Mentllan Future tat Level3blk111llllt es along FIIII-Avenue 9om Madman Roaa Io Loaaat Grove Road 81] F.1,1-Avenue,Locust Grove Road/Eagle Road Birycle Notlh Mentlien Prog,mmeG Install Level 3 bike facilities along Fairview Avenue from Locust Grove Road W Eagle Road B18 Fairview Avenue,Eagle Roatl/CloveNale Roatl Bicycle —1,Mentlien Future Instull Level 3 bike faciliti—along Fairview Avenue from Eagle Roatl b Q.—I.Roatl B19 F—Win Road McDermott I Black Cad Raad Birycle Notlh Mentlien Future Install Level 3 bike bcllllles along Franklin Roatl from MCDermottb Bieck Cat Roatl signing and pavement marking to eg Level 1 Dike 820 Gange,—M.Bikeway,R.—I.Avenue l ClOO-1e Roatl Bicycle North Mentllan Future hc'lities along the Granger Avenue Bikewayxistin from R—Ms Avenue b CI.—I.Raad Instull signing antl pavement marking b existing Level 1 and B21 G.M.I.Melts Bikeway,Black Cat Road I GMd-1 Creak Way BiryGa Notlh Mentlien Future Level3 bike facilities along the G-dida-Malta Bikeway from Black Cat Road to GMhOd!Creek Way Install signing and pa—M ma-g W exlsting Le I 1 a 822 Lintler-Mentllan Bikeway,Cherry Lane/Chintlen BoulevaM Birycle North Mentllan Future Level 3 bike faClllles along We Lintler-MerMlan Bikeway from CM1erry Lana tu Chintlen BoulevaM B23 Linder Road,I-/F-1,11.Road Bicycle Notlh Mentllan Programmed Install Leval 3 bike facilities along Lintler Road from -80 b Franklin Road B26 linter R.ed Maple Avenue/Clrerry lane Bicycle Notlh Mentlien Progremmed Instull Leval 3 SO f.dliti.along Lintler Roatl from Maple Avenue to Cherry Lane Install Level 3 bike faCllitles along LIMO,Roatl from Cherry B25 Lintler Roatl,Ch—Lane I Tumble Roatl Birycle Notlh Mentlien Progremmetl Lena b Emereld Falls Drive antl ham Ch—Drivetu Tumble Roatl 1-1 Leval 3 Bike FadlNea on Lintler Road from Chinden B28 Linder ROM,Chinden Boulevard/Duck Alley Road Bicycle Notlh Mendlan Progmmmed BoulevaM b Du&Alley Road.IN.pOj.is part of 0. ghOW,'I-MO,Roatl Bikeway(Phase 1)'POod Install signing and pavement marking to existing Level 1 and 827 Locust Grove-Eagle Bikeway.Pine gvenue I MCMlllan Roatl Bicycle North Mentlien Future Level 3 Dika facilities,and fill In gaps in existing Level 3 faciliges along the Locust Grove-Eagle Bikeway from Pine Avenue b McMillan R.ad B28 Locust Grove Rea,SummerhalgMS Drive/McMillan Roatl Bicycle Notlh Mentlien Future Instull Leval3bikefacilities.lmg LocustGrove Rcadfrom Summ.tllMigh%Dnve b McMillen Road B29 Locust Grove Road,McMillen Road I Chin—Bout— Birycle Notlh Mentlien Future Install Level 3 bike facllllles along Locus[Grove Roatl from McMillen Roatl W Chintlen BoulevaM B30 McDermott Road,IdC I Franklin Roatl Bicycle Nodh Mentllan Future Install Leval 3 bike facllites Mid,MCD-hM Road from 1-8a to FmnMln Roatl 831 McDermoft Road,Franklin Road/Cherry Line Birycle Notlh Mentlien FUWra Install Leval 3 bike facilities along MCDennott Roatl from F--Road b Cherry Lane B32 MCA.—Raad Cherry Lane/I-Mck Raad Birycle Notlh Mentlien Future Instull Leval 3 bike facilities slang McDermott Roatl from Cherry Lane b Uatick Road .3 McDermott Rmd,J.-Rmd I—11an Road Birycle Notlh Mentlien Future Instu11 Level 3 bike facllllles along McDermott Roatl from Uaick Roatl b McMillan R..d BM McDermott Road MCMlllan Roatl/Chintlen BoulevaM Bicycle Nodh Mentllan Future Install Leval 3 bike faclligas lid,MCDennotl Road from MCMlllan Roatl b-Moh BoulevaM .35 MCMI11an Road,Can Atla I Star Road Birycle Notlh Mentlien FUWra Install Level 3 bike facilities along McMillan Raad from Can Ada W Star Road B38 McMillan Road Star Road I Mc—.Roatl Birycl. Notlh Mentlien Future Instu11 Leval 3 bike 1acilities.1-9 McMillan Rcad from Ste, Road to McDermott Raad .7 McMillan Roatl,MCOwmott Roatl/Black CeI Roatl Birycle Notlh Mentlien Future 1nstu11 Level 3 bike faCllitles along MCMlllan Roatl from McDermott Road W B—CW Road Install Leval 3 bike fecllitles almg MCMlllan Road from Black B38 MCMI1lan Road BIMh Gat Roatl I Ten Mlle Roatl Bicycle Nodh Mentllan Future Cal Roatl W San MW Way antl from ..—Way to Ten Mile Roatl 839 MCMlllan R.M.Ten Mlle Road I Linder Road Birycle Notlh Mendien FUWra Install Leval 3 bike facilities almg McMillan Raad from Ten Mlle Road W Linder Road N Meridian Bike PM!Plan D M200630 Draft Protect Urt Page 527 Item#16. B60 McMillan Roatl,—Roatl I Medtlian Road Bicycle Nodh Medtlian Future Install Leval 3 bike facilities slang McMillan Roatl from Lille Road to Medtlian Roatl B61 McMillan Roatl,Meridian Roatl/Locust Grove Roatl Birycle —1,Meridian Future Install Level 3 bike faclltles along MCMlllan Roatl from Medtlian Roatl to Locust Grove Roatl Install signing antl pavement m ro exiagtg Level 1 bike B62 MCMllbn-Ustick 8lkeway,Cool RMer Avenue/Eagle Road ."_1 Nodh Medtllan FUMre hcitldes along me MCMlllan-Ustl0 ck Rl Bikeway fmm Cad Id- --to Eagle Roatl B63 Medtlian Roatl,—y Ddve I Lava Fells Dr. Bicycle Nodh Medtlian Progremmed Install Level 3 bike facllitles along Medtllan Road—by Drive to Lava Falls Drive B44 Medtlian Roatl,MCMlllan Roatl I Cltintlen Boolevartl Blo le Nodh Medtlian Progmmmetl Install Leval 3 bike facllitles along MerlClan Road from MCMlllan Roatl to Chlntlen Bool...,l B65 Pine Avenue,Rink Cat Road/Ten Mlle Road Bi le Nodh Medtlian Future Install Leval 2 bike facilities along Pin.Avenue from Black Cat Road to Ten Mile with Road Install Leval2 bikefacilities Bang sAvenue from B66 Recoka Avenue,Florence Ddval Fairview Avenue Bicycle Nodh Medtlian Future Florence Dr.to Fairview Avenue with consWctlon of Improved roadway Install signing antl pavement making W existing Level 1 B47 R.—Wey Bikeway,Pine Avenue l F—,title Drive Birycle Nodh Medtlian Future bill,acil'dms along the R—,d,t Wey Bikeway from Pine Avenue to Famaide D— B43 Star Road,Ustick Roatl/MCMlllan Roatl Bicycle Nodh Medtllan Future Install Level 3 bike facilities along Star Road from Ustick Roatl W MCMlllan Roatl .9 Star Road,MCMlllan Road I CMnden Roulavmd Ri le Nodh Medtlian Future Install Leval 3 bike facilities along Star Road from McMillan Road to Chlnden Boulevartl Install signing antl pavement marking to existing Level l antl B50 Ten Mile-Lm-Bikeway,Linder Chi——1— Bicycle Nodh Medtlian Progremmed Leval3 bike facilities along the Ten Mile-Linder Bikeway Irom Linda,Road to CMnden Roulava,d Install signing antl pavement making b existing Level 1 bike B51 Tree Fa,m Way-Tree—Ddve.Chlntlen BoulevaM I Black Cat Roatl Bicycle Nodh Medtlian Future tacllides along Tree Farm Way antl Tree Crest Ddve from Chintlan BoulevaM to Black Cat Roatl Install slgning antl pavement marking to existing Level 1 bike B52 Ustick-Ch.,Bikeway,Black Cat Roatl/Chateau Drive Bicycle Nodh Medtlian Future lacilities along the Ustick-Che Bikeway tm Black CeI Road antl—.1,Chateau Ddve .53 Ustick Road,Can Ada Road I Star Road 11"de Nodh Medtlian Future Install Leval 3 bike facilities along Ustick Road from Can Ad. Road to St.,Roatl B56 U-1,RCad,SMr Roatl/MCDermod Read Bicycle Nodh Medtlian Future Install Leval 3 bike facilities Bang Ustick Road from Btar Road to MCDermod Read B55 Ustick Roatl,Mc0annod Roatl/Black CeI Roatl Bicycle Nodh Medtlian Future Install Level 3 bike faclltles along Ustick Roatl from McDermott Road to Black Cat Road — Ustick Roatl.Black Cat Roatl/Ten Mlle Roatl Bicycle Nodh Medtllan Future Install Level 3 bike facilities along Ustick Road from Black Cat Roatl IC Ten Mlle Roatl .51 Ustick Road,Ten MII.Road I Untler Road Bicycle Nodh..I'd n Programmed Install Leval 3 bike facilities along Ustick Road from Ten Mile Road to Untler Road N Meridian Bike Petl Plan D 20200630 O,aff Project Urt Page 528 Item#16. 51 Black Cat Roatl,Franklin Road to CM1erry Lane Sidewalks Nodh Meridian Connecigapsfrom existing sidewalk on botM1 sides of Black Cat Raad 52 Black Gat Roatl.CM1erry Lane to Ustick Roatl Sltlewalks Nodh Mardian Future Gunned gaps from existing sitlewaik on both sides M Black Gat Rcad 53 Black Cat Roatl,Ustick Roatl to McMillan Roatl Sltlewalks North Meridian Future Connect gaps from existing sitlewaik on both sides of Black Cat Rcad 54 Black Cat Road M-11l,Road to Chlnden Bout— Sidewalks North Meridian Future Conneel gaps from existing sitlewaik on both sides MBlack Cat Rcad 55 Black Cat Roatl.Chi—Boulevard to Tree Crest Dme Sidewalks Nodh Meridian Conneel gaps from existing sidewalk on east sId,of Black at Rcad SB Linder Road l-84 to F2nk11n Roatl Sidewalks Nodh Meridian Programmed Connect gaps from existing sitlewaik on west side of Linder Road S] Linder Road CM1erry Lane to Li-kRoad Sidewalks Nodh Meridian Programmed Connect gapsfrom existing sitlewaik on botM1 sides of Linder Road ConneG gap ham h W igsidewalk anwest side Locust SB Lacu.t Grove Raad Laighfield Drive W Star Lane Sidewalks Nodh Meridian Future Grove Raad along Ovid,mproving narrow sidewalkIk on east .Ise a roaawav Sg Locust Grove Roatl.M-11an Roatl to Chi—,Boulevard Sidewalks Nodh Meridian FW.. Conneclgaps from existing sidewalk on east sltle of Locust Grove Rcad InaW ll sidewalk on the west side of MCDermotl Road 510 McDermott Road,Ustick Road W McMillan Road Sidewalks Nodh Meridian FUW re acting to sidewalk on U.Ock Raad and McMillan Raad bromnnecllWry to Owyhee High School stall sidewalk on the scud,side of McMillan Road 511 McMillan Roed,Star Road W MC —ft Roatl Sidewalks Nodh Meridian Future acting tc sidewalk on McDermott Road for connectivity b Owyhee High SahOc1 S12 MCMIIIan Road MCDe Roatl to Black Cal Roatl Sidewalks Nodh Meddlan Future Connect to e,i g sitlewaik and connect gaps on the solid, side of McMillan Road 513 McMillan Roatl.Black Cat Roatl to Ten Mlle Road Sidewalks Nodh Meridian FW.. Connect to existing sidewalk on both sides of McMillan Roatl S14 MoMlllan Roatl,Ten Mlle Roatl to Linder Roatl Sidewalks Nodh Mardian Future Connect gaps from existing sidewalk on the nodM1 and scud, .Ides of MCMIIIan Roatl 515 McMillan Road,Linder Road to Meridian Roatl Sidewalks Nodh Meridian FW.. Connect gaps from existing sitlewaik on 11e south side M m_Ilan Road S18 PlneAvenue.Black Cat Roatl to Bllhnore Avenue Sltlewalks Nodh Mardian Future Connect to exisling sidewalk on the south side of Plne A e.U. Install sidewalk on the narih side of Ustick Roatl��L] S17 U.Bck Rcad,Star Road to McDermott Road Sidewalk. Nodh Meridian Future Waidewalk on McDermotl Road for connectiviry High School 518 U.Ock Road Mc0enno0 Roatl W Black C.1 Road Sidewalks Nodh Meridian FUW re Co 1 gape from existing sidewalk on both sid Roed N Meridian Bike Ped Plan D 20200630 Draft Protest JA Page 529 Item#16. Pllj�ID N— Priority Ct Ustick Road and Nine Mile Creek Crossing Nodh Meridian Future Install enM1ancetl crossing where Nine MII.Creek pathway meek Ustick Road C2 U.tick Road and TowIrl,.Ne DrW C...Ing North Meddian Future Install a pedestrian signal on Ustick Road at Towe riNII Drlve C3 MCMIIIan Roatl Intl Pllltl,e Way Cmssing Nodh Mtid.In FltllInstall an enM1ancetl Detlestrian crossing Intl cuN romps on MCMIIIan Roatl at Palatlne Wa Install an enhanced crossing(pedestrian hybrid beacon)on CA Ch,n Lane Intl Medtllan Llb.ry Cmssing Nodh Medtllan Prog.mmetl 2020 Cherly Lane from West 8Ui Intl Llnder.This will reeoire relocation d the existing school zone beacon W th.west C5 Usgck Roatl Intl Venable Lane Crossln9 North Meritlian Install an enM1ancetl crossing(petlesMan M1ybritl beam,)on Ustick Roatl at Venable Lena Install an enhanced—IN(pede.th.h M1ybritl beacon)and C6 McMillan Road and Summit Way Cmsaing Nodh Meridian Future w nwenetl sM1ouWe.on MCMIIIan Roatl at tl�e Summit Way raec h in oNer for peaesMensmltydisto traveling along local mad.to acceea S.—Pah. Install an enM1ancetl p.d.....crossing.Meridian Road C) Mendian Raad and Settlers P.* Cmsaing North Meridian Future ar Settle.Park entrant.and Sundance Subdivision ropath Install an enM1ancetl crossing(petlesMan hybrid beacon)on CB M—wri Roatl entl Producer Drive C...,N Nodh Mendian Future Meridian Rcad at Pmdutar Drive.conned existing partway CB Medtllan Road and Diredor Street Cmssing North Wrldlan PIN.... Install an enM1ancedosscroshumshg pull signal)oh Medtllan Road, Dlredor SVeet acr St.Ig us School Install an enM1ancetl petlesMan crossing(petlesMan hybntl C10 I.—It Grove Roed entl Walbridge Drive C.ssi,g Nodh Meridian Pmg.mmed 2026 beacon)ac ss L.-Grave,from Wcadbndge entl Wdedower C11 Nola Roatl entl Crossroads Middle School Cmssing Nodh Meritlian Future Install a painted crosswalk on Nola Roatl It Cfo Ids MIUUIe School stall an enM1ancetl crossing hp de.bian hybrid beacon)on 012 Lomd Grove Road and Hentege Park Street Crossing North Meddlan Future stage Park Sireat,access for M ,I,TecM1nimldChIh,HIgM1.-.I C13 Pine Avenue entl Hickory Avenue r sing I Nodb Meddian Future ,.ha'HdcrosAs�ng(padashian hybrid beamn)on N Meridian Bike Petl Plan D M200630 Draft P.I.d JA Page 530 CHD b J s 626, \ NEIGHBORHOOD � B6j,. B5 ■, Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan Chinden Blvd/US-20/26 -�-- ■ .a L B50 1% B2 Ll1 _ Keith un Recommended ■ +� �•, Bird Park _ - B1a 0 N Bicycle Projects B9 BrG B34 Heroes B1\�1 V B5 .' ■�21 Park* i B7> v LEGEND J McMillan Rd m Heritage MS W RECOMMENDED PROJECTS B36 B4� Ballfields ,"WE IBa1 Low-Stress Bikeway V 10627 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Bike Lanes B33 _�. B50> B2s — "`� B27> B42 . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Enhanced Bike Treatment � .B4> ,B7 X B47 > Bike Treatment 0 � Settlers Park 4 B55 B56—►B7 B50Y■'K 57 = EXISTING Ustick r-7 Low-Stress Bikeway B25 - -- Seasons Park r L --r B20 Bike Lanes B3 �+ - B B52> B5z> B52 Julius M. Kleiner Rectangular Rapid > > m 67 Bzz B5z � Memo ial Park ! Flashing Beacon f Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon ■ B11 25 ' B13 ■ ■ ma -�4N ■ IrB16 B18 ■ Cherry Ln F — ■ B43 Fairview Ave . Ba6 Traffic Signal o g \ Fuller Park _ \\ 615, - , School Flasher B3J B2 • . . :B45�.. . . -- __- Pine Ave Parks ■ - - DESTINATIONS - - = B19 - - - -A Franklin Rd ce M School .. Library ■ > c > � 0 B300 a, -- � -� L Hospital Shop ■ -- B23 GJ u�'i H 1-84 $ _ 0M Community �� Page 531 0 Miles Our Mission: We drive quality transportation for all Ada County…Anytime, 1 Edinson Bautista August 25, 2020Sr. Transportation Planner, ACHD Anywhere! 2 Identify existing gaps in sidewalk and bicycle networkClearly defined prioritized and ranked projectsUser friendly neighborhood plan Identification of transit, biking and walking facilitiesMapping of biking and walking destinations 3 4 Early March 2020)-River Valley Elementary School (North Meridian 5 81 comments–North Meridian Public feedback Online Open House (July 2020)Online Interactive Comments Map (April 2020) 6 13 crossing projects•18 sidewalk projects•57 bikeway projects•Projects under considerationNorth Meridian 7 Adoption Hearing –rd Sept 23Commission work session–th Sept 9SeptemberPrioritization and plan developmentAugust • . l f • I � I a4lo-&h 4etWaa NEIGHBORHOOD L=:Bicy:c:1�eEt Pedestrian Plan J CHD M Nil Recommended Pedestrian Projects LEGEND McMilla • • S11 S12 �S1 � RECOMMENDED'�� ' ' • r�• Sidewalk Crossing 8310 Sidewalk PROPOSED Ustick tom` CBus Route 517 18 - • _ •Seasons Pa c • �i Bus Stop r .� i•C� EXISTING Pious M. Bus Route J ME - - - h.W Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon ,� ner �� . . Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Traffic Signal School Flasher Pa rks DESTINATIONS Sim • � • '��'� ��` 0 • • • __ SchoolLibrary •� ! Hospital Shop Community F)l 0 Item#17. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Community Development: Eagle Road,Amity to Victory Design Update Page 533 Item#17. MEMORANDUM E COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT August 20, 2020 TO: Mayor Robert Simison City Council CC: David Miles, Chief of Staff Cameron Arial, Community Development Director Caleb Hood, Planning Division Manager FROM: Brian McClure, Comprehensive Associate Planner RE: Community Development: Eagle Road, Amity to Victory Design Update The Eagle Road, Victory to Amity expansion project is proposed as a five-lane roadway, including center turn lane, with multi-use sidewalks on both sides of the street. The existing roadway has a two and three-lane rural cross-section, with numerous bike and pedestrian gaps. The project includes a pathway crossing north of Zaldia Drive and a roundabout (RAB) at Eagle and Zaldia. This mile corridor is Meridian's#5 priority project in ACHD's draft 2021-2025 Integrated Five Year Work Plan. Initial preliminary scope and design work began in 2018, and included two public open houses. Design and right-of-way acquisition has been occurring since, and construction is set to begin later this year. The project is included on ACHD's 90 day bid list. Recently, ACHD expanded this project to include intersection improvements at Eagle and Amity, which is an existing single-lane roundabout(RAB). The Firenze Plaza project, approved in 2017 and located on the northwest corner of the Eagle/Amity intersection, had originally agreed to complete expansion of this single-lane RAB into a dual-lane configuration, in coordination with ACHD. Development has yet to occur however, and ACHD determined that they would need to complete the intersection to retain benefits of the roadway expansion to the north. ACHD's engineering consultant has updated the design of this RAB to include a bypass lane on the northwest section of the RAB, intended to address projected travel demand for motorists traveling south to westbound. The complexity of this design and in relation to concept designs of the adjacent property(Firenze), may necessitate revisions either to adjacent property access or to the intersection design. On August 3rd, a Tuscany Subdivision resident addressed the Meridian Transportation Commission with concerns related to design of the multiuse crossings with the roadway widening, at the local streets, and with the proposed RAB at Zaldia. The Transportation Commission ultimately requested that City Council consider addressing the multiuse pathway concern with ACHD. During the public review and design process, Meridian staff raised similar concerns with the multiuse crossings, and discussed a similar treatment with City Council on an earlier version of the Locust Grove widening project. While ACHD went a different direction with the design of Locust Grove project(no multiuse pathways), ACHD staff ultimately felt that this crossing treatment was in the public's best interest on Eagle Road. Community Development. 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642 Page 534 Phone 208-884-5533 ■ Fax 208-888-6854 . www.meridiancity.org Item#17. On August 18th, the Mayor and City Council requested this project be discussed in more depth at the August 25th City Council workshop. Staff will be available and happy to answer any questions about either of the proposed RAB designs and the multiuse crossing design. Lastly, and related to this project, City Council has previously supported a Parks and Recreation budget request of$10,000 to develop landscape concepts for the center area of the RAB islands. ACHD is aware of this design effort, but as part of cost share discussions has requested the city install an interim treatment of bark mulch, to ensure the center areas are not left bare. If this pending cost share is approved, Parks and Recreation will bring forward a budget amendment of $9,000 to pay for this interim treatment. Page Page 535 Eagle Road, Victory to Amity Project Update City Council August 25th, 2020 Brian McClure, Comprehensive Associate Planner C��fElI Eagle Road, Overview Section Line ' §3 45 i 2' 1 C' 3' 2' 12.5' 1" 5.5 3.5' 1" 12 5 2 3 2' 3uiter Travel Lone Travel Lane 7—el Lone Travel L❑ne hut'^r-ter Multi h,ay l.se Uulti Use 'n. F'ntFwny. S 5" Concrete Side-ulk ' Item No. 706.4.t.E1 �� — Thickness Of Plant Mix Pavement — SP3, LPatternetl Gvncrete, 4" Of 3/4" Crushed Aggregate 3�se Ilem 614.4.1.A.1 Item No. SSP 07013 (Plan Quantity) Item N❑. 802A '.A.] 5" Of 3/4" Crushed Aggregate Base, (Typ. Both Sides) Std- 6" Vertical Curb & Gutter (Typ_) (Plan Quontity) Item 802.4.1.A.1 Item Nv, 706.4.1.A.5 18" Of 6" Minus Uncrushed Aggregate Bose Item No. 801.4.1.6.1 Features Timeline • 5 lanes • 2018, Began design • Multi-use pathways (no bikelanes) • 2018, Two Public Outreach Events • Pathway "Z" crossing for 10 Mile Feeder • Since, Design and ROW acquisition • RAB at Zaldia • 90-day bid list • Expanded RAB at Amity • Construction in FY2021 C��(IEFI J Pathway, Sheltered Z iros$ii aSIGNAL ANDSERVICE PEDESIPL � SIG LE W SIOHAL WST AR4: Mr POLE HEIGHT- 16' W STA. 39+9A-6, i3-3' LT ._p A. TOP OF FDUNDAT10N — ELEV.: 2677.75' MAS-1 JRE POLE i MAST APoY: 20' Lu ; POLE H7gHT:40' J_ .' ' SM 37+24.4 33.0'LT roc Iuc Fx F8c -�� =cc — •� PS =ac —TOP OF FOUNDATION FCC ELEV, 24"-44 t 2 SEE LIGHTING SHEETS - J . FOR DETAILS'. . . .. FALE 19 3 SEE]EFAILS POLE A PR SHEET. DETAIL A— — P/L————p L——— PA —--FOR DETAILS SHEETS l3�LE_C / PED SMHAL POLE POLE 01 ff 1 POLE HEIGHT. 12' PED SIGNAL POLE ■ STk 35+99.4, 2.0'LT A PALE HEIGHT: 112' TCP OF FOUNDAT10H STA. 36+30 A. 1.4' RT TOP OF FOUNDATION—5e. — ELEV-: 2677 74' f 36+Od -�rm e POLE ID 'aLE C 37+OL ' —r w w SEE DETAILS SHEEP,DETAIL C p f SEE DETAILS SHEET, CETAL O SEE DETAILS SHEEF.DETAIL O PALE F TA W t. SEE LI4HTIt•4 SHEET k2 FOR CETNL::. .. '— Ebc —. — —POLE E — Vd SIGN{L POLE _ — SIVroAL MA57 AFM 35' ,r _ LUMIRNRE POLE M-POLE HEIGHT- la. I+Ia5T u1M: 70' POLE HEIGHT- 40' / I ,•STA. 36+44-5, IM ETA, 35+M_I, 33.3' R EL T f I E4.4267792FTION rOP ION • TOP OF FOUNDATION—.. .. I .. •,' ' E1EV.: 25T7-85' 1 1' 'Multi-use P�t way, Lo + Street "wrossin9 l R 6H('), 0220 — S ACLE C d 56' EA LT Sk64 INC 43+00 CP-4 44+00 NOU 27' 39"36"E � — — — — — — 2641 .86'— — — — — PI Sta. 43+72.6 'w+d t t - r� .. Creek — ' Ninemi Car stacking in • trout of bike/ped crossing r � 40 40 dp oil M ,' i �'x• .. - � .at �E Sect Z 'Multi-use P�t way, Lo + Street "&rossin9 l R 6H('), 0220 — S ACLE C d56' EA LT Sk64 INC 43+00 CP-4 44-�D9 NOU 27' 39"36"E � — — — — — — 2641 .86'— — — — — PI Sta. 43+72.6 'w+d t t - r� .. (4 I � Ninemi F Many us will continu through without ra p/crossing. Car stacking in Q trout of bike/ped 5 crossing r � * ' eh cle mays ill bloc �+ urther from driver fiel o crossing a d further . ' of view and foct,s on # c "nnplica-te crossing. Eagle Road. Ohscure j� '• .# '.er •• . ' •R 1 4•.� iI by fences an 0 t landscaping on Eagle, . . , i•� until turn approach (les :.' .I)ARTMOOK .. r !� 4p : w 'F E Sect Z Eagle and Zaldia RAB 7 2 R6-4 W11-2 (30 r24"1 Ste. — 29`tt_ 77 47 W16-7F 91ppk Avrvwl w/ [2;'x137 Whke Backq—d Sta,71+50.421t. /5 EAGLE Lw`1.3Q-2)I [30� ROAD w1s-7a 74"x 12•} Rei. Sheet¢+Q '�.i +:,`t. 7 47 E i6LPIA DR cVories•t7� r 47 ••! q 7 W11-2 W11-2 54 12`� (30'x307 (305 21 r2y 4• R75' W16-7 ri16--7p 7P k (2-0 x127 C21".12-) S'Rt R59 R1_7;7 7 SW..51+21. 21'Lt.. RSt' (46'x48"448") 8006.5. 17' R4-7 21 (24•x30"� Sta.61+76,3 Lt. 71 47 77 71 9Q oa 0611-1 f 4 ° (18'K18`J i R75• ,s ,6 1 E ZALDIA DR 5' f'71 17, 15` 18 y 71 + &P 00 - f 't.1_ - +00 -fit e } E ZALDIA DR 7 71 5' 15 19 Z 21 >ti 1 ■■ � F R69' f it-zs+oo r 47 52} 5i 1 f, �. a 21 77 y R75 Ri-2 `a■ ■1 W11-2 (36'.36x36•) f� ■ 47 47 77 [11 -7PP W11-2 Sto.71+72, 1'Lt f 11 -1 (14 x12•� (36•x38") 77 47 E ZnL6W DR 500.8'+0&4Lt. W16-7P (5 rin K 12" (24•K12•) Rrf. Shre!,Pr' 5(Q,60+y 0Rt. Stn.71+32. 10'Rt. W11-2 EAGLE ("!T,7} W1 1-2 47 1yP ROAD (241M7',2) W16-7P 7 47 5ta. 80+92,26'Rt. {24'x12 y Sta.714-40. 13.51t. 7 72 R6� (30"x24-) St.-72+31, 5'RL 91ork Armwa w� WK.B=4mnd E Zaldia Dr - Signing S4 Striping Flan Ji n Eagle and Amity RAO i I h III r I�N ' Y - 50 Sto.86+70.0 56.0'LTA Mn•� .r m 33' 68�r 12.5' 5 LT q 17 i 68 e F00 �6+00 11 0 �. _ ss 17 AF v O 12-5' �r 1,� 36.0 37.0'RT' 50 Z4 L..-.._..-.-._ M --a� � `I i Upcoming EAGLE RD M1a P!, 11+32.47 Cost Share a St°.30+06.62 City previously requested an Offset 4.5 sl 30+,6.4Q. .TBC Elev.,81.16 Offset C'Ri. ' � 8 lignmenk) 11+00 opportunity to do enhanced Stu 4.50,L. )� 34 Offset .50'Lt TBC Lev.81.32 landscaping in the future. ACHD requesting that City install 27 - TRMN4 St..29+73.79 Offset 19.12Lt. /a interim landscape improvements 2+00 BC Elev.81.97 A�o � � o � A� 1— improvements, until permanent landscaping is done. s� Dffsei 90+113L4 If pending Cost share signed, lease 5t° 29+fit°1 p g g , p �eet22998'Lt °Be P TBC Elev.81.84 P4; fi'Verlic°I Curb expect subsequent budget 61 Y 111°nt°bie Truck amendment request, for 27 . 1-ter ° ali9°me°t St..29}3S 07 approximately $9,000. °ff�etoRl; '(F�agle.'Align 12+65 10+00 I I Center Island Detail P1—se°le 1"=10' E IDIAN:.-- QUESTIONS C�'V(EF�MnIAN--,-, Item#18. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Community Development: Discussion Regarding School District Data for Staff Reports Page 536 Item#18. C� fIEN , IN4, IDAHG-. MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Miranda Carson, Comprehensive Associate Meeting Date: August 25, 2020 Coordination Planner, Community Development Presenter: Miranda Carson, Comprehensive Associate Estimated Time: Coordination Planner Topic: Community Development: Discussion Regarding Building Permits Per School Attendance Area Recommended Council Action: Review, Discuss, and Provide Input Background: A draft table has been created to provide information on area growth based on individual school attendance boundaries. The table will highlight schools likely to be impacted by a residential development based on a current application. The intent is to provide the entitlement and building permit data in the areas affected by an application to enhance future planning for both the City and the School District. The draft it will be presented for review, discussion, and input. Page 537 I r Imo.. �i�'�rvi =_•�•a••�i ii it MEN 1,60 o — Oil Ali I. _J I'I ♦c•l mil:••)•)(•ii4�•l• •o'I�r•, • - : • • •- / / / -,■ o ,e '::,;:'::. •a �.. g"InSi•��i:�4�i��i�.i•M,..,,,cracac• • — • -— •— • _■•� • ♦ �«..1• ••,•r`:J•.�.r,y Ali? _�j��.. .� 01 MINIM= •�� •cw�si!iir M111 . 07 ON Building Permits 2016-2020: Prescott Ridge 0.5 West Ada School District Affect - Miles 0 informationThe •.is compiled from various - . .is subjecto constant revision.The City of - •. makes . E IDIAN*---warranty or guarantee as to the content,accuracy,timeliness,or completeness of any of the data provided,and assumes no legal — responsibility forthe information contained• .. IDAHO LI!,•II ■�rr.�- I •ay!'�• (ill - i��l I•j:H�� t�•� •1.� • CHINDEN LU J' = us C 7K ��I� • . • III • • '� Illlii:� 1 • C i, ERR - CO mum Legend illllllll ► \ice• ��Gi �lo�ll.— r, atii Accel • Building Permits 1 1 1 �f�llilil IL E �� 1 • New Multi-Family ResidentialP� LU .IRANKLAN • New Single Family Residential Illlllllllllh.�� _//�`��■ ry ��I�•.IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� ® EkL-AND— Active HearingUJ , Inactive ��= Jlll.II.:�lfrm�rd . lb - A♦■■II;IIIIiILllll��■��1��71i� Boundaries&Special Districts 0 Area of impact Meridian City Limits Parcels LV Prelim Lines EN E [=3 Meridian High School '�-= r�■..11y ,� !®Ili: :;. ., � Building Permits 2016-2020: Prescott Ridge o 0.5 West Ada School District Affect � Miles nt ee as to the . . . .. . . -. . . . - . . .- . . . - . - - .. . - . E IDIAN -�- of onfs ta ed,and es - .. . . - • . • . . -• • .• iDAHD I a It -• - all Nil r .•)H.'iiciil►pray.. l(f�, WAL • •fit • +■ I= � .= i,.`�i:-:I. -••�:�►j�q•��N��iii••"%i � '.'.iiiili��`) -• • •• • • ■.� ♦ • . .�• � .--:,lid; ••.� (••� � �'• �i*�t•�� \� �.r-•III%Illllllllll.i�� J �■ ••••� •• �y4�P21-2 .ice• ••ii.. ■ i. IJ- •»•ft•1�»�•.��•trtti•� ••tau•• • l9l0 V.- nW�, wJ..■:. IIIIIIIIII■ . .. - .. a `'_'_�-`- �iCt°�`e7•� g.i Building Permits 2016-2020: Prescott Ridge 0.5 West Ada School District Affect Miles informationThe •.is compiled from various - . .is subjecto constant revision.The City of - •. makes . E IDIAN*---warranty or guarantee as to the content,accuracy,timeliness,or completeness of any of the data provided,and assumes no legal — responsibility forthe information contained• .. IDAHO Estimated 2016-2017 Additional 2016 Dwelling 2017 Students Dwelling Dwelling Units Distance 24 61 (miles)GeneratedUnitsUnitsChange School NameEnrollment Capacity Pleasant View ES2.465039713715327378% Star MS6.910007046915327378% Meridian HS6.1240019659252382458% Assumptions: 1. Distance, Capacity, and Enrollment is based on the West Ada School District (WASD) Agency Comment letter if available. If the aforemoentioned was unavailable at the time of analysis, enrollment data is based on State Department of Education data. 2. Estimated Additional Students Generated and Possible Additional Students Generated 2020 is based on a Student Genteration Rate (SGR) of 0.8 students/single family residential unit and 0.3 students/multi-family residential unit. By grade level this calculates to: Elementary SGR: 0.369; Middle SGR: 0.185; High SGR: 0.246 for single family and Elementary SGR: 0.138; Middle SGR: 0.069; High SGR: 0.092 for multi-family. This estimate of the school age population change includes students in public, charter, private, and home schools. SGR does not vary for units with age restrictions for the purposes of this analysis. 3. Growth data is analyzed only for the City of Meridian and based solely on building permits through EOY 2020; preliminary plat data is not currently included in this analysis. WASD attendance areas include portions outside of the City that may have planned growth that affects school enrollment as well. 4. Dwelling Units are the additional units in a year based on the building permits that were issued in that year. This includes units with age restrictions. 5. Estimated 2020 Dwelling Units is based on the assumption that the remainder of the year growth will continue at the same monthly average it has been year to date. While City wide growth estimates are available from the City Growth Committee, area specific data is used in this analysis. 6. School attendance areas analyzed are based on current WASD attendance areas at the time of analysis. Attendance areas can change anytime during the school year. Next Steps: 1. Discussion with WASD regarding single family and multi-family SGR will continue. The City and WASD will meet to review SGRs as the area's types of growth and development are changing. 2. Preliminary plat information should be considered with this analysis. 3. What other data would the Council like to see? 2019 Estimated Possible Percent of 2020 End of Additional City Wide 2017-2018 2018-2019 2020 Year Students Dwelling Dwelling Total Dwelling 2018 2019 Dwelling Generated Dwelling Units Dwelling Units Built Dwelling Units 52 UnitsChangeUnitsChangeUnits(as of 8/18)Units2020 33723%45836%15%335536198 38842%54139%17%350560103 151384%1206-20%39%11141782315 1. Distance, Capacity, and Enrollment is based on the West Ada School District (WASD) Agency Comment letter if available. If the aforemoentioned was unavailable at the time of analysis, enrollment data is based on State Department of Education data. 2. Estimated Additional Students Generated and Possible Additional Students Generated 2020 is based on a Student Genteration Rate (SGR) of 0.8 students/single family residential unit and 0.3 students/multi-family residential unit. By grade level this calculates to: Elementary SGR: 0.369; Middle SGR: 0.185; High SGR: 0.246 for single family and Elementary SGR: 0.138; Middle SGR: 0.069; High SGR: 0.092 for multi-family. This estimate of the school age population change includes students in public, charter, private, and home schools. SGR does not vary for units with age restrictions for the purposes of this analysis. 3. Growth data is analyzed only for the City of Meridian and based solely on building permits through EOY 2020; preliminary plat data is not currently included in this analysis. WASD attendance areas include portions outside of the City that may have planned growth that affects school enrollment as well. 4. Dwelling Units are the additional units in a year based on the building permits that were issued in that year. This includes units with age restrictions. 5. Estimated 2020 Dwelling Units is based on the assumption that the remainder of the year growth will continue at the same monthly average it has been year to date. While City wide growth estimates are available from the City Growth Committee, area specific data is used in this analysis. 6. School attendance areas analyzed are based on current WASD attendance areas at the time of analysis. Attendance areas can change anytime during the school year. 1. Discussion with WASD regarding single family and multi-family SGR will continue. The City and WASD will meet to review SGRs as the area's types of growth and development are changing. 2. Preliminary plat information should be considered with this analysis. Estimated Enrollment Estimated after Permits School and Enrollment 3 Applicationv Capacity 732113% 87688% 237199% 1. Distance, Capacity, and Enrollment is based on the West Ada School District (WASD) Agency Comment letter if available. If the aforemoentioned was unavailable at the time of analysis, enrollment data is based on State Department of Education data. 2. Estimated Additional Students Generated and Possible Additional Students Generated 2020 is based on a Student Genteration Rate (SGR) of 0.8 students/single family residential unit and 0.3 students/multi-family residential unit. By grade level this calculates to: Elementary SGR: 0.369; Middle SGR: 0.185; High SGR: 0.246 for single family and Elementary SGR: 0.138; Middle SGR: 0.069; High SGR: 0.092 for multi-family. This estimate of the school age population change includes students in public, charter, private, and home schools. SGR does not vary for units with age restrictions for the purposes of this analysis. 3. Growth data is analyzed only for the City of Meridian and based solely on building permits through EOY 2020; preliminary plat data is not currently included in this analysis. WASD attendance areas include portions outside of the City that may have planned growth that affects school enrollment as well. 4. Dwelling Units are the additional units in a year based on the building permits that were issued in that year. This includes units with age restrictions. 5. Estimated 2020 Dwelling Units is based on the assumption that the remainder of the year growth will continue at the same monthly average it has been year to date. While City wide growth estimates are available from the City Growth Committee, area specific data is used in this analysis. 6. School attendance areas analyzed are based on current WASD attendance areas at the time of analysis. Attendance areas can change anytime during the school year. 1. Discussion with WASD regarding single family and multi-family SGR will continue. The City and WASD will meet to review SGRs as the area's types of growth and development are changing. 2. Preliminary plat information should be considered with this analysis.