Loading...
2020-08-18 Regular City Council Regular Meeting City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, August 18, 2020 at 6:00 PM Minutes PRESENT Mayor Robert E. Simison Councilman Joe Borton Councilman Brad Hoaglun Councilman Treg Bernt Councilman Luke Cavener ABSENT Councilwoman Jessica Perreault Councilwoman Liz Strader PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE COMMUNITY INVOCATION ADOPTION OF AGENDA Motion made by Councilman Bernt to amend agenda to hear Item 3 before Item 2 and to add Idaho Code 74-206(1)(f) to Item 10, Seconded by Councilman Cavener. Voting Yea: Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Bernt, Councilman Cavener PUBLIC FORUM – Future Meeting Topics The public are invited to sign up prior to the start of the meeting to address their elected officials regarding matters of general interest or concern of public matters. This time is reserved for general topics and not specific to an active land use/development application. By law, no decisions can be made on topics presented under this public comment section. However, the City Council may request that the topic be added to a future meeting agenda for a more detailed discussion or action. The Mayor may also direct staff to further assist you in resolving the matter following the meeting. 1. Public Hearing for City of Meridian Fiscal Year 2020 Amended Budget Motion made by Councilman Borton to request an ordinance be presented for approval to City Council on September 1, 2020, Seconded by Councilman Hoaglun. Voting Yea: Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Bernt, Councilman Cavener 2. Public Hearing to Reserve All Foregone Revenue Associated to Fiscal Year 2021 Budget Item heard after Item 3 per amended agenda. Motion made by Councilman Hoaglun to reserve all foregone revenue associated to fiscal year 2021 budget and present City Council with an ordinance for approval on September 1, 2020, Seconded by Councilman Bernt. Voting Yea: Councilman Borton Voting Nay: Councilman Cavener 3. Public Hearing for City of Meridian Fiscal Year 2021 Proposed Budget Motion made by Councilman Hoaglun to request an ordinance be presented for approval to City Council on September 1, 2020, Seconded by Councilman Cavener. Voting Yea: Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Bernt, Councilman Cavener 4. Public Hearing for 2020 UDC Text Amendment (H-2020-0072) by City of Meridian Planning Division A. Request: Text amendments to update certain sections of the City's Unified Development Code (UDC) pertaining to Code Enforcement and Penalties in Chapter 1; Specific Use Standards in Chapter 4; the Public Hearing Process in Chapter 5; and the Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards in Chapter 6. Motion made by Councilman Cavener to continue City Council discussion to September 1, 2020 Work Session without reopening public hearing, Seconded by Councilman Bernt. Voting Yea: Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Bernt, Councilman Cavener 5. Public Hearing for 2020 Comprehensive Plan Policy Prioritization (H-2020- 0073) by City of Meridian Planning Division A. Request: To amend the text of the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan by adding priority levels and assigning responsible department leads to the existing policies of the Plan. This amendment makes no revisions to the text of the Plan, except to add priorities and responsible leads for the policies adopted in December of 2019. Motion made by Councilman Hoaglun to adopt item and prepare resolution to be presented to City Council for approval on Septebmer 1, 2020, Seconded by Councilman Cavener. Voting Yea: Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Bernt, Councilman Cavener DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS \[Action Item\] 6. Community Development: Presentation of Ada County Highway District's Draft 2021-2025 Integrated Five-Year Work Plan 7. Community Development: Presentation of Results of Open Space Study Survey ORDINANCES \[Action Item\] 8. Ordinance No. 20-1888: An Ordinance (H-2020-0009 – Lavender Heights Subdivision) for Annexation of a Parcel of Land Located in the SW ¼ of Section 32, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, as Described in Attachment “A” and Annexing Certain Lands and Territory, Situated in Ada County, Idaho, and Adjacent and Contiguous to the Corporate Limits of the City of Meridian as Requested by the City of Meridian; Establishing and Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification of 55.14 Acres of Land From RUT To R-4 (Low Density Residential) Zoning Designation (16.37 Acres); R-8 (Medium Density Residential) Zoning District (28.07 Acres); R-15 (Medium High Density Residential) Zoning District (3.25 Acres); and R-40 (High Density Residential) Zoning District (7.44 Acres) in the Meridian City Code; Providing that Copies of this Ordinance Shall be Filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as Required by Law; and Providing for a Summary of the Ordinance; and Providing for a Waiver of the Reading Rules; and Providing an Effective Date Motion made by Councilman Cavener to approve ordinance, Seconded by Councilman Bernt. Voting Yea: Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Bernt, Councilman Cavener 9. Ordinance No. 20-1889: An Ordinance Amending Meridian City Code Section 8-1- 4(B)(1), Regarding Requirements for City of Meridian Use Zone Encroachment Permits; Adopting a Savings Clause; and Providing an Effective Date Motion made by Councilman Cavener to approve ordinance, Seconded by Councilman Bernt. Voting Yea: Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Bernt, Councilman Cavener FUTURE MEETING TOPICS EXECUTIVE SESSION 10. Per Idaho Code 74-206A(1)(a) To deliberate on a labor contract offer or to formulate a counteroffer. Amended agenda to add Idaho Code 74-206(1)(f) To communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending litigation, or controversies not yet being litigated but imminently likely to be litigated. Motion made by Councilman Bernt to move to Executive Session, Seconded by Councilman Cavener. Voting Yea: Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Bernt, Councilman Cavener Into Executive Session: 8:54 p.m. Motion made by Councilman Cavener to come out of Executive Session, Seconded by Councilman Hoaglun. Voting Yea: Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Bernt, Councilman Cavener Out of Executive Session: 10:03 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Motion made by Councilman Cavener to adjourn the meeting, Seconded by Councilman Hoaglun. Voting Yea: Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Bernt, Councilman Cavener Meeting adjourned at 10:03 p.m. Item#2. Meridian City Council August 18, 2020. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:10 p.m., Tuesday, August 18, 2020, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Joe Borton, Luke Cavener, Treg Bernt, and Brad Hoaglun. Members Absent: Jessica Perreault and Liz Strader. Also present: Adrienne Weatherly, Bill Nary, Cameron Arial, Caleb Hood, Brian McClure, Todd Lavoie, Jenny Field, Brad Purser, Jeff Lavey, Scott Colaianni, Mark Niemeyer, Joe Bongiorno and Dean Willis. Roll-call Attendance: Liz Strader _X_ Joe Borton _X_ Brad Hoaglun _X_Treg Bernt Jessica Perreault _X Luke Cavener _X_ Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Okay. Take two. We are going to call this meeting to order. For the record it is Tuesday, August 18th, 2020. It's 6:10 p.m. We will begin this meeting with roll call attendance. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Simison: Next item on the agenda is the Pledge of Allegiance. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) COMMUNITY INVOCATION Simison: Thank you. Next item on the agenda is our community invocation, which will be given this evening by Rabbi Fink from The congregation of Ahavath Beth Israel and we -- if you would like to take this as a moment of silence or join us in this community invocation we would appreciate that. Rabbi Fink, you are recognized. Fink: Thank you. Source of life, we thank you for this opportunity to gather and for the responsibility accorded to those who come together to deliberate and to set policy for our community this evening. Grant them we pray the courage to lead and the empathy to listen, that they may govern with wisdom and compassion. May they guide us through these trying times with an eye for steadfastness and safety and inspire us toward a shared sense of the common good. Bless the work of their hands and of their hearts that they might guide us with wisdom and with strength and let us say amen. Page 27 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 2 of 50 Simison: Thank you, Rabbi Fink. Appreciate it. Fink: Thank you. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA Simison: The next item is --which is not on our agenda, but is the adoption of the agenda. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: One thing we need to do is add to the Executive Session, which is Item 10, we need to add Idaho Code 74-206-A-(1)(a), as well as -- oh, excuse me. It's (f). Nary: Excuse me. 74-206(1)(f). Bernt: (1)(f). Perfect. Did we get that? Okay. And then -- what's the other thing? The second thing is that we need to switch Item 3 before Item 2. So, we will just switch those two items for-- for our presentations this evening. Other than that, Mayor, I move that we adopt the agenda as amended. Cavener: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as amended. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. PUBLIC FORUM — Future Meeting Topics Simison: Madam Clerk, do we have anyone signed up under public forum? Weatherly: Mr. Mayor, we have one sign up, Jonathan Walker, to speak about sound abatement barrier on Chinden. Simison: Okay. Is Mr. Walker here? All right. If you would come forward and you can -- you are recognized for three minutes. Walker: Okay. My name is Jonathan Walker and I live in northern Meridian near Tree Farm and Chinden, with the expanding highway. Simison: And if you could state your full -- your address for the record. Walker: 4102 West Silver River Street. Page 28 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 3 of 50 Simison: Perfect. Walker: And so she's going to pull up some pictures. I just -- my concern is, basically, about a sound abatement wall that was supposed to be installed behind our row of homes and I don't think it was installed according to what they were supposed to build for sound abatement purposes. I have got a lot of help from Mr. Hood and as well as Ms. Sonya Allen. They have kind of helped me with -- to gather a lot of information. They have been very helpful with this, but I just kind of wanted to kind of bring this forward. I'm trying to get done whatever we can get done as soon as possible because of the traffic noise. So, is there a way I can put a pointer on any of this or anything? So, up near the top what you see is -- that's Chinden Road and these houses -- these -- these plots right here that are right next to the road, that's where our row of houses are and so our backyards back up to -- directly to the road there and from what I understand is -- is Brighton Corp built this neighborhood and as part of their plat agreement they were supposed to build a sound barrier that meets City Code 11-3H-4D, which is typically supposed to be a ten foot barrier, but there can also be alternative means and they -- that's what they submitted to the city. Could you go to the next slide? You just click on that next one. I mean it's free. So, this was what was presented -- what they submitted to City Council and it had the sound professional approved, said it would have -- it would work as an alternative and what we see is this six foot wall and, then, this large four foot tall graded berm which is graded to three feet of length for every foot of height. There is trees on both sides and there is a 40 foot dedicated common lot between the lot line and the end of the sidewalk -- the far side of the sidewalk and this is what residents were under the impression was going to be built there and it looks very good and even said in the request that it was going to be similar to the Rambo Subdivision, which looks almost exactly like this, which is right next door. So, that's kind of what everybody was under the impression of. And could we go to the next slide? So, that's what was actually built. As you see there is no -- there is no berm, there is -- I guess in the future they could put some trees there, but, essentially, it's online with the road. There is no berm that breaks line of sight or anything like that and I think someone that looks at this picture is like, well, maybe that berm is on the other side of the fence, because that doesn't look anything like what they submitted. So, important to look at here is that fence right there, just -- Weatherly: Hold on just a second. Walker: Sorry. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, my apologies, but the slides -- we saw the first slide, but nothing was changing after that, so -- Walker: Oh. Hoaglun: Definitely -- definitely want to see it, Mr. Mayor and Mr. Walker. Mr. Mayor and Adrienne, yes, now -- now we can -- now it changed to the second one, so -- Page 29 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 4 of 50 Walker: Okay. But you can see on there it basically said there was going to be a 40 foot dedicated common lot, which the sound person said that was important, the distance. Also the height of the berm there and that the fence would be at the top of this berm, which would be above the retaining wall you see there on the lot line on the right. And, then, so if you go to the next one. I said there -- you see there is no berm that goes higher than the level of the road. There is none of that landscaping. The -- the distance I think they said in the form was going to be 56 feet from the edge of the roadway to the lot line. It's -- it's about 30 feet. So, it's almost half of what they said it was going to be and, then, if you go to the next slide, just so you can see, this is from inside the yard. So, you can see that there is no berm there that they were supposed to build on top of that and just to be clear, where that fence line is on top, that's where the vehicles are. So, it's like they drive by at eye level. It's not like they are on the other side of that wall right there, because this is kind of recessed into the ground. So, the vehicles are right up against that -- will be driving right up against that wood fence there and there is -- there is nothing blocking them at all, but that berm was supposed to be there. And, then, I have a video next. I don't know if you can play that or not. And that's -- that's the berm right there that was -- I mean that's all that they put there when it was supposed to be this 12 foot wide, four foot high rolling berm with landscaping on both sides of it for sound abatement and I think that everyone just -- we were kind of under the impression that -- that something was going to be built similar to what's next door in Rambo and all the other -- and every other -- on the southern side of that road every other residential area has a hardshell wall for sound abatement and we are the only one -- it's a thousand foot stretch and we don't and we would really like them to build it -- build a hardshell wall, because they, obviously, didn't build what was approved by the sound engineer. Simison: Thank you, Mr. Walker, and appreciate your help and understanding as we walk through the technical difficulties. I think the Council understands. Unfortunately, the public forum there is no comment or back and forth at this point in time, but, hopefully, that was explained to you, but it's been shared and we have received it and I know staff is aware of the issue -- Walker: Yeah. Simison: -- and the community development. Walker: All right. Thank you. Simison: All right. Thank you. Walker: Thank you for your time, everybody. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Page 30 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 5 of 50 Cavener: I guess a question about process. I don't know if this is something that is a potential future meeting or something that's happened -- going to be addressed more administratively. Nary: So, Mr. Mayor, Members of Council, I can tell you I -- I have been involved in some of the conversations with Planning and this project hasn't been final approved yet either. So, it's still an active construction area because of the roadway. I don't know if the roadway impacted some of those changes or not, so we will work with Planning and probably have to come back with you to update you on what the progress is. Simison: And that likely would -- Mr. Nary, could be accomplished through an e-mail or other measure. Nary: Absolutely. ACTION ITEMS 1. Public Hearing for City of Meridian Fiscal Year 2020 Amended Budget Simison: If there is no Council action, which is required or available. All right. Moving on to Action Items. We will turn to our first action item, which is a public hearing for City of Meridian Fiscal Year 2020 amended budget and I will turn this over to Mrs. Fields if she is with us. Fields: Right here. Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of Council. Thank you for having me on Zoom tonight. I'm going to share my screen. Let me know if you see it. Okay. So, I'm here to present to you our fiscal year 2020 amended budget. This is our public hearing. Tonight I am going to go over our three major funds with you. General Fund, Capitol Improvement Fund and Enterprise Fund. We are going to stop and take any questions and answer any questions. Our public hearing is tonight. And with the closer of that we will ask Council to approve our fiscal year 2020 amended budget. So, that -- Borton: Jenny? Fields: Yes. Borton: Could I jump in with one quick question? Fields: Of course. Borton: Maybe a comment, but the image over your left shoulder is just outstanding. Fields: What image? Oh, my God. Thank you. Borton: I love it. Page 31 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 6 of 50 Fields: Thank you. So, with that we are going start -- during this time last year, Council, we had adopted our original 2020 budget. Total city budget last year at this time for 2020 was 120.5 million dollars. So, throughout the fiscal year departments have come before you to seek the budget amendment approval. So, our final budget for 2020 came in at 121.6 million dollars. That is up .91 percent from where we had it originally. What I'm going to go through tonight with you is the changes that happened throughout the fiscal year. So, this will be more of a review for you, because these budget amendments -- these changes have been presented to you over the last ten months. So, with that said we have a total of 36 budget amendments. General Fund, Capital Improvement Fund, and Enterprise Fund is -- the amounts are displayed on the screen for you. This is just more of a formal process that we notify our citizens of the state of our fiscal year 2020 budget. With that we are going to jump right into our General Fund budget. General Fund last year -- the original budget was set at 67 million dollars. We ended General Fund 71.3. Total budget for General Fund is up 6.5 percent and personnel, capital, and carry forward is displayed on the screen in front of you. Within the General Fund we have a total of 24 total budget amendments that was approved. The major three that were approved for employee benefit plan trusts, contracted building services, streetlights for a couple of Chinden projects, and our carry forward adjustment. In our Capital Improvement Fund we started the year off of 5.39 million dollars. Our final capital improvement fund ended up four -- a little over four million. And the reason is with no budget amendment and Capital Improvement Funds, our carry forward adjustment made it go down 24.6 -- or 24.46 percent and all of that is attributed to our parks. Discovery Park project carry forward adjustment. In the Enterprise -- Enterprise Fund our original budget was at 48.1 million dollars. We finalized Enterprise Fund budget at 46.1 million. That is down four -- about four percent. And within our Enterprise Fund we have a total of 12 budget amendments that were approved. The major ones that were approved throughout the fiscal year were our wastewater -- our wastewater land acquisition, the water main extension projects and our meter budget amendments. They also have a carry forward adjustment that was down 7.3 million and majority of that was attributed to our wastewater capacity expansion project. I know I went through those really fast, but those were just some high level overviews of what has taken place in -- during our fiscal year 2020 budget and I will sit for any questions. Simison: Thank you, Jenny. Council, any questions? Okay. This is a public hearing. Madam Clerk, do we have anyone signed up to testify on this item? Weatherly: Mr. Mayor, we did not. Simison: Okay. And someone took control of my computer, so I can't get to -- if there is anyone in the -- on the Zoom app who would like to -- sorry. Apologize. I did not realize my video was not live. Is there anybody in the Zoom app who would like to testify on this application or do we have anybody who is on the phone? If so, if you can raise your hand and the Clerk can bring you on to testify. We see two attendees and neither one is raising their hand. So, hearing no further -- seeing no one wishing to testify or no further questions from Council, do I have a motion? Page 32 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page , of 50 Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: I move we close the public hearing on City of Meridian's fiscal year 2020 amended budget. Cavener: Second. Hoaglun: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any discussion on the motion? Hearing none, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: Is the approval of the amended budget needed tonight or does it follow next week with the ordinance? Nary: Mr. Mayor, Members of Council, so we just need direction to bring the ordinance back. So, you do need to make a motion for that. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: I move that we do provide that direction to legal to bring back an ordinance for approval of the 2020 -- fiscal year 2020 amended budget for our consideration and vote next week. Hoaglun: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second to have an ordinance brought back by Council next week. Is there any discussion on that motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. 3. Public Hearing for City of Meridian Fiscal Year 2021 Proposed Budget Page 33 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 8 of 50 Simison: With that we will move on to the next item on the agenda, which is public hearing for City of Meridian fiscal year 2021 proposed budget and I will turn this over to Brad. I will open this public hearing with staff comments and turn this over to Brad. Purser: Let me know when you can see me. Let me know when you can see me. I'm sharing my screen here. Nary: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Mr. Nary. Nary: One thing -- I was looking -- I forgot to look at the -- the timeline for the budget. Actually, Finance had scheduled that for September 1 st. So -- so, that was the intention was to bring that back. So, if you wouldn't mind correcting that, so we can line up with Finance, because they prepare the final numbers that get attached, so -- Simison: Would the motion maker -- let me backtrack and approve one officially. You need to reopen something, Mr. Nary? Nary: The motion would be to rescind your prior motion and correct it to September 1 st. Borton: So moved, Mr. Mayor. Simison: Okay. Hoaglun: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second to rescind the previous motion as it relates to the date and move it to September 1 st. Is there any discussion on that new motion? If not, I will call the question. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Simison: Okay. And, Brad, we can see you now and we heard you before. Purser: Great. I'm sharing my screen. Can you guys see that? Simison: You see -- yes. Borton: Yes. Simison: A blank -- a blank screen if that's what you are hoping for. Purser: No. Page 34 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 9 of 50 Simison: There you go. Now we got it. Purser: Okay. Great. That's good. Here. Appreciate having me out. I'm here to talk to you about the 2021 proposed budget. As part of that I'm going to talk about the overall budget process and how we got here today. I'm going to talk about the 2021 proposed budget and its different pieces. The General Fund, Enterprise Fund. We will end with questions. And, then, next steps. So, with that how did we get here today? This all began in February, March time frame when Mayor and some of the Council Members and everybody in the -- in the budget, we all met together with all the departments and we went over the line item budget line by line, make sure that we were good with what was in there. We took that budget that we had created and we presented that to people -- or to Council in June. So, the overall process was about a nine month process. In June we met twice where we presented a balanced budget and got that approved, after which we, then, went forward and published that final budget and now we are seeking public support and input as part of the public hearing process. Once that public hearing is concluded and we will, then, seek approval from Council to approve the budget. Once approved we can, then, begin to appropriate the funds as they have been presented and, finally, after the funds have been appropriated we can, then, begin to execute that budget as we have presented it. The overall process, as I said, is about a nine month process. There is a lot of people involved, which we are grateful for -- to have their involvement and support. So, Let's look at the overall budget. The FY-2021 total budget is 129.3 million dollars. As you can see the personnel side of that, if you look at the pie chart on your left, you can see about 44 percent of the overall budget is related to personnel. When you add up the capital you can see that you have about 38 percent of the budget is related to capital expenses. This is citywide. All funds included. When you look at the pie chart on the right you can see that about half of the budget that we are presenting is related to either public safety, parks, that type of thing. The other half is related to wastewater, our Public Works group. So, when we dive into the General Fund side of things, going a layer deeper, we can see that the total 2021 proposed budget for the General Fund is 71.4 million dollars. Of that you can see 59 percent of that total number is related to personnel and we have operating and capital making up the balance. If you look at the chart on your right, the pie chart, you can see that public safety makes up about 67 percent over -- overall -- overall General Fund budget and the rest made up of parks and admin and Community Development group. So, looking at revenue, our total anticipated revenue for 2021 is 65.1 million dollars. The majority of that is made up of property tax, about 60 percent of that. The rest of that is made up of inter-- intergovernmental and other sources of revenue. Total we are anticipating at 65.1 million dollars. Moving on towards our Enterprise Fund, FY-2020 budget for Enterprise Fund is 57.9 million. Again, looking at the chart on your left you can see that, you know, personnel makes up about 39 percent of that, while capital makes up the vast majority of that. It looks like about 54 percent of the overall total. Of that you can see 57 percent looking at the chart on your right -- the pie chart on the right is related to our -- our wastewater. Overall budget for 2021 is 57.9 million dollars. Moving on to our revenue for Enterprise Fund, our anticipated revenue for 2021 is 44.5 million dollars. This is made up of-- 61 percent of that is utility sales and the balance is really in two other budgets here, our utilities connections and our other utility revenue, you know, combined totaling the 44.5 million. With that that basically Page 35 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 10 of 50 makes up our overall budget in the different funds and I will pause for a minute and if there is any questions I will stand for any questions. Simison: Thank you, Brad. Council, any questions for staff at this time? Seeing nothing from Council for Brad at this time, we will see if we had anybody signed up to testify on this public hearing from the public. Weatherly: Mr. Mayor, we did not. Simison: Okay. If you are on the Zoom call and you would like to testify on this item, please, indicate so by hitting the raise your hand feature. We do have one person potentially in there that could testify at this point in time. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Seeing no one who is raising their hand to testify at this time, Mr. Borton. Borton: We just can't hear you. The audio's cut out again. Simison: Can you hear me now? Borton: There we go. Simison: Okay. We have --we have no one who has signed up to -- no one who is raising their hand to testify or signed up to testify and no questions for Brad at this point in time. So, I will turn this over to Council for any -- any other questions from any other staff that they would like to address. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I wanted to start off by thanking the fire chief for clarifying some -- some questions on the design process of the fire stations that are proposed in the budget this last week. Before we go I would like to throw it out -- are there any more questions or concerns Council would like to discuss before we move on in regard to the fire stations, the design aspect, or anything else? Simison: Councilman Bernt, just for the record -- is my mic working now? Oh. Okay. Perfect. Thank you. I know one of the -- in conversations with other members of the Council who maybe aren't here tonight, just want to make sure something is very clear from my perspective as the Mayor. Approving the design for two stations in this budget does not mean the cat is out of the bag and does not mean that you will for certain see two stations in next year's budget. There is a lot of question marks that need to occur between now and, then, including what happens with the legislature. So, just so it's clear from my perspective as the Mayor, there is no guarantee that there will be two stations Page 36 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 11 of 50 presented in next year's budget. There is a lot of questions and there will be a lot more conversation with Council. This is just about the design and moving two -- two forward so that they would be ready when the time is right and the funds are there. So, just want to put that out there so everyone hears it very clearly. Bernt: Perfect. Thank you. Is the -- is the chief on the line? Is he -- Simison: The chief is on the line, as well as the architect, if there is anything specifically you would like to address towards them. I think the only -- the main question that I had -- and we have been discussing this a little bit -- is in regard to the savings. The proposed -- the proposed savings in regard to Station 8 if we were to continue with the current line item in the budget to -- to appropriate spending authority for impact fees for Station 8 and -- and what that looks like if we were to hold off and it's -- for some time in the future and -- and maybe have a budget amendment or something along those lines and what those numbers look like and what the savings might be. Niemeyer: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Is that Chief Niemeyer? I couldn't hear or -- Niemeyer: Sorry. Yes, sir. This is Chief Niemeyer. Mr. Mayor, Council, first let me just kick off -- great conversations that have occurred around this. I really appreciate the questions that have been asked. A lot of great questions. I know Council Woman Strader is not here tonight. She and I connected on some of the questions, so -- Council President Bernt, to answer your question, I mean there is certainly unknowns as far as cost increases; right? I think we all buy a gallon of milk. We all buy supplies and we see increases in goods that we buy and the architectural design firms are no different. Typically architectural design is based on the cost of construction of a facility and so as those construction costs go up so do at times the cost of design. Certainly I faced that with my house when Cheryl and I built our house. So, doing this now -- and just a reminder, I know, Council, you are aware of this, these are impact fee eligible items. We went through a process with impact fees where we identify growth and what would be needed to meet that growth and certainly design was a part of that and so we have been collecting those impact fees from the development going on. I know we have talked a lot about savings. What does that savings look like? How much does that look like? As somebody who manages overall our impact fee fund, for me personally if I can save 30,000, 40,000 or 175,000 dollars that can be applied in the future to the construction of a project, certainly I am -- I am desiring to do that and I think we have been able to demonstrate and I appreciate the feedback from the presentation I sent out on -- on Friday, the narrated PowerPoint, that was the first one I have done. So, hopefully, it worked well. But really showing the snapshot of what those different aspects of design are and what those different costs are that make up the overall cost of design. I do have Gunnar Gladics on tonight. Gunnar is with Rice Fergus Miller. That was the firm that we used for Station 6 and I think I articulated in the presentation our design for Station 6 was about 620,000 dollars. The design for Station 7 starts off at about 580. These are conservative numbers and I -- if we need to I can let Gunnar speak to that. They anticipate Page 37 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 12 of 50 further savings, but certainly not willing to put numbers to that at this time as we move forward. But I want to just echo what the Mayor said. This is step one and it's an isolated step, even though I understand the conversations that occurred last week. This allows us to be somewhat shovel ready if and when that discussion around the construction of these stations occur. We don't want to face delays like we faced with Station 6. We are trying to stay ahead of this ballgame. I think we have a very good timeline laid out and a very good plan laid out. So, Council President Bernt, I hope that answered your questions. Certainly happy to elaborate that or have our architect chime in on that as well. Bernt: Sure. Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: So -- so you answered one of my questions, the cost for the design of Station 7 would be 580k. Conservatively speaking it could be a little bit more, it could be less, whatever. But what is the exact cost for the design of a proposed -- Station 8 included in the budget and -- and not in the budget if it were done at a later date? Niemeyer: Council -- Council President Bernt, great question, and that was in that slide that I articulated out. With delays in design, wait a year, wait two years, we know there is going to be cost increase. I think that's based on inflation, whether it's two percent, three percent, four percent, one percent. It's no different than any other business. Architects are no different in the cost of the goods that they provide. So, we anticipate that there would be a cost increase. Within the slide for Station 7 and 8 -- and, again, I think Councilman Borton asked me a great question, so I want to -- I want to kind of hit on that a little bit. The original FY 21 design would get us to construction docks. If you look at the overall cost, for example, the cost of Station 7 that was included in the slide that I sent out at 580,000, also, then, goes into the bidding and it goes into the construction management. The architect always plays a role in the management of the construction, not to be confused with the CMGC and for Station 6 that -- that CMGC was ESI. So, this gets us to construction documents. We don't move further in the full expense of that cost until we get into the construction. So, I think I have alluded to in a previous presentation and this is no different than any other city project in which construction is being done and design is being done, it's not just a one year cost, it's cost over a two to three years throughout the life of that construction and throughout the life of that project. So, I hope that answered your question. Certainly if it didn't happy to have Gunnar chime in and get more specific to your question. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: So, I mean I get that and that -- that all makes complete sense. But I would just like to know what that number is. I know that -- I know that there is potential that that number could increase, if not -- if not -- if not approved. I understand the philosophy Page 38 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 13 of 50 behind that. I just want to know -- I want to know what -- what the cost savings is going to be. Niemeyer: Mr. Mayor, I think at this point, Mr. Mayor, I would like to have Gunnar chime in. I think we have sent that cost savings out, but certainly, Gunnar, the architect, Gunnar Gladics, can chime in and talk about the savings in designing two stations at one time. Gladics: Yes. Thank you, Mark. Thank you, Mayor and Council. Simison: Gunnar, if you could say your name address for the record. Gladics: Oh, yes. Sorry. My name is Gunnar Gladics and I'm at 14222 56th Avenue Northwest, Gig Harbor. So, just to clarify, Council Member-- I think it was Treg, the -- you were asking the cost if design on Station 8 is delayed after completing design on Station 7 for a year or two years or what have you? Bernt: Mr. Mayor, Gunnar, just to be clear, I -- pretty simple. I just want two numbers. I want to know how much it's going to cost to -- for design if the -- if this design is appropriated through the 2021 budget versus if it's not. I just want to know what the number is? It's that simple. Simison: And, Councilman Bernt, maybe if Station 8 --or 7 was to be 580,000 and Station 8 would be 580,000, both separately, and you do them the same, is the number still going to be 1,160,000 or is it going to be different to do them both at the same time? Is that part of the -- the -- what you are looking at? Bernt: Mr. Mayor, I just have heard multiple numbers and I just would like to know what the number is going to be. Gladics: Council Member, we have -- what we -- what we did was provide number to Mark in the Fire Department for that initial number of 580k for Station 7 and, then, the Station 8, if conducted at the same time, designed, as -- our current estimate would be 406,000 for the -- the all in, including bidding and construction throughout the entire process. Bernt: I couldn't quite hear what he -- Mr. Mayor, did you -- Simison: Four hundred -- Bernt: Four oh six. Is that what you said? Simison: Yeah. Bernt: And that's included; right? Gladics: Correct. Page 39 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 14 of 50 Bernt: Okay. I got you. So, if -- if we decided to do a budget amendment, you know, three to six months or a year down the line, what would that number end up being if it's -- if it's not approved in this -- in this budget that's what -- that we are talking about right now? Gladics: Well, I think we probably would -- would want to work with the city. I think there would be some definite benefits to having done the --the plan -- I believe that both stations would -- would more or less be the same, so I think the -- the building itself would remain mostly the same. Some of the civil engineering and landscape components may change a little bit, but really probably what we would just adjust is the construction administration and bidding components. Of those two I think we had 27,865 and 133,347 respectively and those may need to be addressed if the contract is not continued into construction. Did that makes sense? Bernt: Sure. So, what's -- what would be the total number? Gladics: Well, for the -- I would -- I would assume probably about a three percent per year increase in cost for the -- let's say 150,000 for bidding and construction administration, but not being able to do the math right off the top of my head. Simison: Mr. Bernt, maybe if I could help even understand yourself. Are you saying what would the number be if this was done separately? That's essentially what you are saying. If this was done six -- so, if we did Station 7 and it was done and we, then, did a budget amendment for Station 8, what would be the cost for Station 8. Is that your question? Bernt: I know -- I know that -- yeah. I mean essentially. Or what happens if we -- we approach this after the legislative session when we will be know more what that looks like. Simison: So, again, I guess my question for you is Station 7, what would be the cost to do Station 7 this year and assuming no inflationary cost in one more year what would be the cost of Station 8 to do that project? Is it the 580? Is it the 580 for both or is it different? Gladics: Oh. Now I -- so, Station 8 1 think that base price 406 -- and what I was saying is only a small amount of the fee would actually increase, which I'm thinking if it's -- if it's designed to the final construction documents, the only thing that we would need to look at after pausing is the total value for construction administration is about 150,000. Bongiorno: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Deputy Chief. Bongiorno: Can we have the Clerk add Mark back in. He got kicked out of Zoom. Thank you, Adrienne. Weatherly: You're welcome, chief. Page 40 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 15 of 50 Niemeyer: Thanks, Adrienne. Sorry about that. It just -- Zoom kicked me out all of a sudden. Yeah. I think to the Mayor's point, the question, if I understand it correctly, is what is the current cost of Station 7 and 8. What are those potential savings. The cost of Station 7 is 580. That's down from 624 for Station 6 and if we do Station 8 design that cost is 406. Now, that includes the bidding phase and it also includes the construction management phase, which I know we are not at. That is a separate conversation post- legislative session. So, within that slide, Council President Bernt, that I sent out on Friday, you have got the cost breakdowns where you could see where we are at through construction documents. That's -- that's getting into the HVAC system. That's the shovel ready aspect of the project. So, I think I have been following the conversation and the question I hope. I am certainly happy to follow up. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: I think it makes sense what's being presented and correct me, chief, if I say this wrong, but in this current budget with the 600,000 dollars is the total allocation for, quote, design of fire stations. That--that would allow the schematic design, design development and construction documents to be completed for seven -- a seventh station at approximately 375,000 dollars and four an eighth station at approximately 227,000 dollars. The difference between those two I think is the savings that's being discussed with a second. The additional design cost of bidding and construction admin is the same in both. It may go up three or four percent a year, that portion of it, but the big -- what I understand Gunnar talking about and from what the chief has said, that within the 600,000 dollars in the current impact fee allocation in this budget you could design them both. If you wanted to only design Station 7 by itself that would only cost about 375,000 dollars to do the -- to do the design work, excluding bidding and construction admin. Niemeyer: Councilman Borton, you have got it spot on and I think we got there through a series of texts and a-mails through this process. But, yes, you have got that exactly. I think the cost was 632 and some change to get to that point that you were talking about with Station 7 and Station 8 and, then, from there as we go through and see what the legislature is going to do in that further conversation, we would talk about construction and timing of construction and that's when the other fees would apply. And I apologize, Council, I don't have a cool cutout behind me like Brad and Jenny. I have to work on that. Simison: Council, any further questions on this topic for the chief or Gunnar? Okay. Thank you, gentlemen. Don't go too far, but I think you are relieved for a few minutes. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: That -- that helps answer the questions I had and following up from the last budget meeting with regards to both stations. I really appreciate your comments. We Page 41 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 16 of 50 have been overly sensitive to make sure -- I guess cautious in a good way to make sure we are not creating any unintended inertia to do two stations at one time and you have been very clear that that's not the case and we are going to have a discussion perhaps this fall or early winter specifically on one versus two, pros, cons and where that one may be. So, that -- that's a big part of getting comfort and going forward with this part of the budget. Understanding that you are not expecting the Council to have making -- be making that commitment and we are not thinking that you are making that commitment either. So, I appreciate that. Simison: And just to be clear, unless there is something specifically the Fire Department needs, this is probably not a conversation until next April when it really -- until we have enough data or information to make educated information to Council so a decision can be likely made. Borton: Or whenever the CFP is presented. I guess it's part of that. Simison: Well, the CFP -- the CFP will -- is one thing, but what the legislature does will impact the CFP later in a way that does -- you know, we -- again, I can tell you the CFP can accommodate both of these and the staffing with the assumptions that our CFO normally puts into it. However, all those assumptions can go out the window very quickly in April. So, we won't want to have a real conversation about it until then. Council, any other questions on this budget at this time for Brad, Todd, or any of the other directors who are present in person online? Okay. We did have someone else join. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: I will just do another -- this is a public hearing. Is there anyone who is on the call who would like to testify on this item? If so, if you can indicate by raising your hand and the Clerk will bring you in. Seeing no one wishing to raise your hand. So, Mr. Borton, I will turn this back over to you as you were seeking recognition. Borton: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I just -- for clarity, we opened the public hearing for the 2021 budget, as well as the proposed foregone revenue decision? Simison: We have not done the foregone revenue yet. No. Borton: Okay. Got it. Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: If there is no other discussion from Council or the public, I move that we close the public hearing on the City of Meridian's fiscal year 2021 proposed budget. Hoaglun: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second. Is there discussion on the motion? Page 42 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 17 of 50 Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I really appreciate, again, the clarifying answers from the chief and from Gunnar being close and -- and available and for -- for shedding light on -- on this topic and I don't mean to be annoying, I don't mean to, you know, pound a dead horse by any means, but I -- I do pause for concern about this. I feel -- I don't -- I don't see -- I don't see -- if we were to have this discussion in April and in -- and if at that time we felt like we needed to appropriate some funds through a -- through a budget amendment for a design of Station 8 versus doing that right now, I don't -- I don't see a huge difference in that and -- and in my role -- and I feel like I -- in my opinion I -- the prudent thing in my opinion would be to approve this budget, only approving the design of Station 7 until we know more about what Station 8 is going to look like and if that means we have to pay a couple of bucks along the way I think that's prudent. I don't see that -- I don't -- I don't see that -- that number significant enough at this time to -- to include Station 8 in the budget currently. So, those are my thoughts. Simison: Is there any further comments on the motion? If not, all those in favor of the motion signify by saying aye. Those opposed nay. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Simison: Now we are into the -- Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: -- the public hearing is closed, but -- Mr. Borton, yes. Bernt: I spoke too soon. I apologize. Borton: I apologize -- I apologize, too. I -- we moved to close the public hearing and, then, there was discussion and Councilman Bernt made comment, but I don't know what motion was just put before us. Simison: Well, the -- Borton: If there was one. Simison: Your motion -- all we did was close the public hearing. Councilman Bernt jumped the gun. Spoke on -- during the closing of the public hearing. So, now -- now when the public hearing is closed, so we are into discussion element. Borton: Thank you, Mayor. Bernt: Super honest. Page 43 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 18 of 50 Hoaglun: Well, Mr. Mayor, it's been talked to -- if I might address the issue. Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Yeah. Yeah. I appreciate Councilman Bernt trying to look at it in a different light and seeing if there is ways with concerns that we have about future -- about the future and what might happen. We don't know what it is. But I'm confident about locking in some savings now, even if that changes a little bit, it's money not -- we don't have to spend that -- that is impact fees, but certainly we can -- we can move that to construction. So, that's always -- always a good thing and I appreciate his taking the time to look at it, but with your assurances, Mr. Mayor, and I think from the Council side we are going to proceed cautiously. We are not committing to anything beyond just the design phase and getting things ready and, then, at that point in April, as you point out, we could have a more informed discussion about what we are going to do in the future. So, I'm comfortable with the amount that we have budgeted for FY-2021 and would like to move forward with that. So, Mr. Mayor, if there is no further comment from Council, I would move that we have a -- legal bring forth an ordinance for approval on -- I believe on September 1 for the FY-2021 budget amount of 129 thousand 364,101 dollars. Borton: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, I will have the Clerk call the roll. Roll call: Bernt, yea; Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, absent; Perreault, absent. Simison: All ayes. Motion is agreed to and a resolution will be brought forward on September 1st. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. 2. Public Hearing to Reserve All Foregone Revenue Associated to Fiscal Year 2021 Budget Simison: Thank you very much to the Finance Department to get us this far. Purser: Mr. Mayor? Simison: We will see you again -- well, maybe not you all, but we will see your work here in a few weeks. Moving on to the next item on the agenda. Purser: Mr. Mayor? Page 44 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 19 of 50 Simison: Yeah. I'm not getting rid of you. So, don't worry. Next item on the agenda is a public hearing to reserve all foregone revenue associated with fiscal year 2021 budget and open this with staff comments and turn this over to Brad. Purser: Yeah. This next piece is really just to elect to reserve all foregone revenue associated with 2021 budget. The amount of that would be a little over a million dollars. With that I can stand for any questions. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions for Brad at this time? Okay. This is a public hearing. I don't know if we have anyone signed up. If there is anyone online who would like to testify on this item if you could do so by raising your hand down below in the -- on the Zoom app. Madam Clerk, do we have anybody signed up to testify? Weatherly: Mr. Mayor, we did not. Simison: Okay. And seeing no one who is raising their hand to testify, Council, do I have a motion to close the public hearing? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I move that we close the public hearing on reserving all foregone revenue for the fiscal year 2021 budget. Hoaglun: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing regarding the foregone associate -- revenue associated for fiscal year FY 21. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Simison: Mr. Nary, I assume we have seen these as similar? Nary: Yes, sir. A motion to bring back an ordinance on September 1st. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: For -- at least for conversation, I'm not sure where -- where Council is. I have put considerable amount of thought on this and this is a new process for us that was thrust upon us by the legislature to communicate to the public our intention of what we are or are not going to do with a foregone. I have said I think in a number of City Council meetings not taking a property tax increase in my opinion is a -- is a commitment to the Page 45 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 20 of 50 taxpayers. We don't have an ability to control or impact future Council actions, we can only stay focused on what's before us and to me I think it's a prudent decision that if we are -- if we are not taking a property tax increase that we should not take the foregone or not allow the foregone to be taken in future years. So, I'm not sure what the process would look like and I'm not sure where the rest of the Council sits. This is the first time that we have had the chance to discuss this, but I am supportive of not reserving the foregone for future use. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: To continue that discussion, I think that's a weighty consideration for sure and I -- I understand where you are coming from with it. I think our Council and -- current and past has done a really good job in utilizing proceeds and revenue sources, excuse me, right when -- when necessary and taking what's necessary, utilizing no more than necessary. There have been years where this Council has taken zero, has taken one, one and a half, two. It has exercised sound discretion in -- in not collecting the maximum amount in many years, which I applaud that practice and this year in particular in taking zero percent. So, with that track record I -- I trust the judgment of Council to utilize foregone only and if that extreme necessary circumstance were to occur in the future, I would be very reluctant to hamstring a future Council's ability to exercise that sound discretion, getting input from the public and -- and I think it would be appropriate to continue the same process with -- as has happened in previous years where it has been available for this Council to have taken foregone and we have elected every year not to do so, because it wasn't the right decision. So, I -- I trust that same sound judgment would occur in the future and I would like to afford future Council that ability to exercise it and such. So, I would be supportive of retaining the forgone for future years for Meridian based on our track record. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: You know, I appreciate Councilman Cavener's, you know, concern and his viewpoint and outlook to it. Yes, we don't want to tell taxpayers, oh, no tax increase this year, but we are going to take it next year. I agree with Councilman Borton that we do have to be cautious as we approach each year and making sure we only fund what is necessary and I think past Councils have done that and at the same time I want to make sure that we do have adequate resources to fund the fundamental elements of good government and we don't know what the future holds and to have that option or--whether it's this Council or another Council, I think we have to preserve that option. I think the track record, as Councilman Borton has pointed out, has been good and I hope that continues, but I also would support reserving the foregone revenue associated with this upcoming fiscal year. Page 46 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 21 of 50 Simison: Is there any further discussion on this item or is there a motion? Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, I would move to -- have we closed the public hearing on this? Simison: Yes, we have. Hoaglun: Okay. Thank you. I thought we had. All of a sudden it occurred to me we had not. Mr. Mayor, I would move that we reserve all foregone revenue associated to fiscal year 2021 budget and that legal present an ordinance on September 1 for Council consideration. Bernt: Second. Borton: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second. Is there any discussion on the motion? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I appreciate the discussion from my good colleagues who are testifying or communicating remotely and I hope that should the city be in a position where they have to look at foregone they continue to have these collaborative, although sometimes disagreeable conversations in the future. So, I appreciate the comments from both of you and you sharing your perspective tonight. Simison: All right. With that Clerk will call the roll. Roll call: Bernt, yea; Borton, yea; Cavener, nay; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, absent; Perreault, absent. Simison: Three ayes. One no. Motion passes. MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE NAY. TWO ABSENT. Nary: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Mr. Nary. Nary: Mr. Mayor, just wanted to clarify from earlier when the Council Member Hoaglun read off the motion for the FY-21 budget he actually read it as 129 thousand 364,000 and Page 47 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 22 of 50 I know it was 129 million and that was what was discussed and that's in the document. Just want to clarify that's the ordinance we will bring back is 129 million, so --just wanted to be clear -- Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, thanks to Mr. Nary for -- Simison: My ears heard millions, but maybe I was thinking that. Nary: Yeah. And I -- Brad thought he heard it as thousands. So, just wanted to make sure. If we are going to bring back what was presented. Simison: Okay. Perfect. 4. Public Hearing for 2020 UDC Text Amendment (H-2020-0072) by City of Meridian Planning Division A. Request: Text amendments to update certain sections of the City's Unified Development Code (UDC) pertaining to Code Enforcement and Penalties in Chapter 1; Specific Use Standards in Chapter 4; the Public Hearing Process in Chapter 5; and the Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards in Chapter 6. Simison: Okay. Next item is No. 4, public hearing for -- for 2020 UDC Text Amendment. We are going to open this public hearing with staff comments. I'm going to turn it over to Mr. Hood. Hood: Thank you, Mayor, Members of the Council. Can you all hear me okay? Thumbs up? Okay. Thank you. So, I'm going to be presenting to you tonight the Planning Division's application to amend the text of the city's Unified Development Code or the UDC as we often refer to it. For the purposes of this application the Planning Division worked with our code enforcement division to propose the changes that you have before you tonight. I'm going to talk a little bit more about code's version of that here in just a second. You will probably recall -- and probably can't -- want to forget, but you can't -- that we went through a series of workshops this spring and so this is really that culmination of those conversations we had about process improvements for planning this spring and this is the first round of those. So, these are the less controversial changes, the process improvements that planning is proposing. There is another process that Bill Parsons is leading with our UDC focus group, which includes members from the development community, citizens at large, and others that are kind of working through those more sticky, again, more controversial, more development related improvements. So, you will see that probably around the end of the year. So, they are working through that. They have had one meeting. They have got another meeting scheduled for -- I believe later this month. But this is kind of round one. So, again, we didn't-- I didn't share what your -- what's before you this evening with the UDC focus group, but we did share directly and indirectly with our development community. So, the BCA, we transmitted to Page 48 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 23 of 50 them. Our development stakeholder group, we have shared this information with them. So, we haven't been trying to keep this a secret, it just hasn't gone through kind of our normal protocol for UDC changes. But, again, I feel like it's been vetted pretty well with you all through, again, those workshops this spring. So, at a very high level -- and I'm going to -- I'm going to walk you through these here in just a minute. We have got kind of three sections. The code enforcement and penalties section in Chapter 1 of the UDC. We got the public hearing process changes in Chapter 5. And, then, you have got some what I will call cleanup changes in Chapter 4 and 6. So, those are kind of the three overarching themes, if you will. So, with that let me see if I can share my screen and just walk you through, then, the -- the text and it shouldn't take too much. This has really kind of been pared back from that master list of potential changes to, again, having two different rounds -- kind of the round that -- and I'm not going to put words in anybody's mouth, but, you know, the 300 foot to 500 foot notice that I will talk about here in just a second, I don't know that everybody's a fan, but nobody is just, you know, pounding their fists in anger that we are talking about changing it to -- to 500 feet. So, I think this is a good first step to improve our process. I guess the other thing I would point out real quick that the changes that are in that second tier that I mentioned -- so, the planning process improvement changes, what you don't see and what we are working on right now is kind of a companion FAQ website that we are going to put up on our website, so that the public, once they get a -- you know, neighborhood meeting invite notice, hey, what can you expect? You can expect, you know, to have the developer hold this at a location within five miles and that they should bring a site plan and be available for questions. Next step is likely an application submittal with a public hearing and just kind of walk people through that process -- our process from their standpoint. So, you are a layperson, never been through this, but you got an invite to a neighborhood meeting or a public notice and you are like what does this mean, we are going to put that information on our website, that, again, helps people just understand what to expect in our process. So, just kind of keep that in mind as we go through this, because, quite frankly, there is not a whole lot of meat to these changes. They are pretty straightforward. But when you look at these changes and, then, how we are going to actually share that information with the public, I think is going to be pretty powerful. So, jumping to -- can everybody see the screen okay? Okay. So, let's -- let me just start by saying I received a note this morning from Lacey in code enforcement. As you -- you are aware, she is the interim supervisor over there. We were actually working with Richard Everett on this and when he was still here we submitted the application. There has been some last minute concerns about what code enforcement is actually requesting this evening and they have asked to actually withdraw that from this application. So, everything you see with the title under 11-111 that has to do with code enforcement, they need to -- they need to talk with our prosecutor a little bit more, with our IT Department a little bit more and just make sure that the things are actually proposing -- all the T's are crossed, I's are dotted, everybody's on the same page. So, that's the request tonight and the motion would be to remove everything that has that Title 11, Chapter 1, Section 11. So, I'm not going to run through that, just because, again, our proposal at this point in time is to not adopt those changes. So, before I move to the next tier, though, I just want to see if you have any questions or -- or concerns even with that. And I will mention Lieutenant Colaianni I believe is on the line and -- and I will defer to him if you have any questions, but before I move on just wanted to touch base on that. Page 49 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 24 of 50 Simison: Council, any questions on that item for Mr. Hood? Hood: All right. So, Mr. Mayor, I'm going to continue on. I didn't see anything there. So, I'm sorry -- and 11-112, too. So, that penalty section will also need to be deferred. So, 11-111 and 11-112, everything to do with code enforcement this evening. So, the third tier -- it's not -- it's in order of how it appears in the -- in the UDC, not in the order of how I kind of group them together. It's a minor change here,just so it matches up our definition section with our specific use standard section, we are adding the vehicle sales and rental, we are adding the word and service, so it just matches those up. So, again, I'm not going to spend any time on that, that's just sort of a scrivener's error type of a cleanup thing there. Then we get into the -- the second tier that I mentioned, the planning process improvements that we are proposing. And, again, most all of this should look very familiar to you. We didn't have a hundred percent consent on all this going through those workshops in the spring, but, again, none of this information should surprise you. Some of it, again, is just kind of -- I think it was Councilman Hoaglun that brought it up, you know, 11 by 17 isn't -- isn't as standard, maybe 18 by 24 inch signs is a little more your political types of signs that you could maybe get a little bit more readily laminated or are affixed a little bit easier to a property. So, again, kind of clean up things that way where we change it from 11 by 17 to 18 by 24. Neighborhood meetings. And I'm going to kind of group 11-5A-6C and 11-5 -- 11-5A-6C. So, one is your neighborhood meetings and one is your mailing and publishing of the public hearing notices. So, you will see both of them. There is a lot of similarities. The main one, again, being our current standard is that developers are supposed to send neighborhood meeting invites to everybody within 300 feet of the subject property and the proposal here is to change that to 500 feet of the subject property. The second subsection there, subsection three, we are proposing that they, then, have to -- excuse me -- have to consider those comments by not submitting an application to planning any sooner than ten days after that neighborhood meeting. So, at least their intent to consider some of the comments they may have heard from the public, not just turn right back around and submit the same thing at their neighborhood meeting, but really consider those comments that were received at the neighborhood meeting and potentially make changes to their plan is the second part of that. And, then, having those neighborhood meetings on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and at a reasonable time and we listed that at 6:00 -- starting between 6:00 and 8:00 p.m. with - - with -- within five miles or closer of the proposed project site or at City Hall. So, again, that should all sound pretty familiar, but I will just pause and see if you have any comments on that section as I scroll to the next sort of related section. Hoaglun: Caleb -- Mr. Mayor, this is Brad. Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Yeah. Mr. Mayor and Caleb, I just -- I'm assuming people would understand that Five Mile location for some of our activities that might occur on the city border, we -- our preference is that they hold it within the city, not in another city. Well -- or within five miles, because, you know, if they are on the border they could conceivably do it from Page 50 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 25 of 50 another location that's not in city limits, but we are anticipating city limits. Is that -- is that correct? Or does it matter? Hood: Yeah. Mr. Mayor, Councilman Hoaglun, it doesn't matter. I mean certainly that's the intent, but reading, you know, the letter of the code as written and you certainly could have it, you know, in Ada county, unincorporated Ada county. There are some schools that are not incorporated within city limits yet they are still considered Meridian. There may be an entrance -- an instance where there is a church or something just on the other side of the county line or city line that is a nice, you know, kind of gathering, you know, place to have a neighborhood meeting. So, it wouldn't be prohibited. Certainly it's what you said, it is the intent that it be in Meridian city limits, not go as -- you know, hopefully it's even closer -- a lot closer than five miles to the project site, but it wouldn't explicitly have to be held within city limits, so -- Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, follow up. Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Yeah. I -- I can see your point, Caleb, on that. It might be something just right there in unincorporated Ada county or across -- just across the road and there might be a perfectly fine facility that they could use and hold the hearing. So, yeah, I -- it's probably better not to muck it up by adding any requirement like that, so -- but definitely we want the intent to be as close as possible and preferably within city limits. But, yeah, we will just leave it as is. Hood: Good question. Thank you. Okay. So, again, sort of related -- at least part of this similar to the last section, we will send -- the Clerk, then, will send postcards to everybody within 500 feet of the property being considered, instead of the current standard, which is 300 feet. So, that's pretty much the change there. I will briefly pause, but, again, I feel like we have talked about that quite extensively over the last several months. Written testimony. So, this -- this one is actually the one that we got written testimony on is -- is written testimony. So, this is a new section. It's one, again, where -- where I don't know that there was a hundred percent consent from Council and as you will see in the four written -- three out of the four anyways written testimony received on this topic were regarding this subsection. The proposed standard is -- is written testimony submitted for consideration. So, you can consider that. You and the Planning and Zoning can consider it to be submitted to the Clerk by noon the day prior to the public hearing. A lot of this has to do with intent; right? We were getting a lot and you still continue to get a lot of last minute information. People are submitting letters and oftentimes they are long and they submitted it at 4:30 the day of the hearing and that -- you don't have an opportunity to review that. You have got a workshop and so how can you reasonably read and review all of the written testimony, especially if you get flooded with it the day of a hearing. So, this is more about intent and trying to disclose, boy, we would really like for you to submit your written testimony and, in fact, we are putting it in code if you want it to be considered it needs to be to the City Clerk by noon, so that, again, it gives you a reasonable opportunity at least to -- to review that. Again, you have three folks that commented, Page 51 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 26 of 50 though, on that. Some wanting that to be even less amount of time, so 48 or 72 hours before. So, I don't -- I don't know what the right answer is here, but -- but this is kind of what we -- I heard the direction from Council when we talked about it last -- a few months ago, so -- and, then, I will pause, because we are almost done, and I just have one more section and this is back to tier three, if you will. So, those kind of other UDC developments and I will classify this as kind of cleanup related. Just clarifying kind of our terms. Cul- de-sac, dead end streets, we use those terms simultaneously, so a lot of this is just making it clear that they are kind of one and the same and, then, talking about emergency access and how that can also be a consideration when having a cul-de-sac or a dead end street that extends more than 750 feet, but, really, we are trying to keep those at 500 feet or less. So, with that, Mr. Mayor, that is the extent -- let me just give you a summary, I guess, of what -- the Planning and Zoning Commission did hear this on July 16th. At the public hearing the Commission voted to recommend approval of the subject requests. Bill Parsons presented on behalf of Planning. Written testimony was provided by Laren Bailey, Sally Reynolds, and Dave Yorgason. I mentioned their comments already. There was no key issues of public testimony. The Commission did have some questions about agency comments and staff reporting agency comment deadlines and, again, we have cleaned some of that -- those things up with publishing our packets earlier in the week and working with staff to meet those deadlines. Placement of public hearing signs. So, that's something, again, we talked about this spring, but went to round two should the city hire out contractors to put up the public hearing signs, should we continue to allow developers. So, you will hear more about that in round two. I don't know where it's going to land with that UDC focus group, but a good discussion there thus far on -- if the city should hire companies to put up public hearing signs or not. Review of common driveway standards and so including that in round two and, again, we are reviewing parking standards with round two, so Bill's on that. They also had some questions about communicating this information. I mentioned that already with the website we are going to develop and share the information and provide hyperlinks on how to -- how to participate in the planning and hearing processes and, then, had some questions on the -- on written testimony one day instead of two days as proposed. So, at the end of the day they didn't make any changes to the staff recommendation. Since that hearing we have received one more, again, public comment from Mike and Malissa Bernard, again, regarding the cutoff times for accepting public testimony and, then, the code enforcement requests to continue their -- their changes to coincide with -- with phase two as well. So, in summary, staff believes the changes proposed with this application will make the implementation and use of the UDC more understandable, usable, and enforceable, while greatly improving the transparency and efficiency of the planning and development process and with that I will stand for any questions, comments you may have. Simison: Thank you, Caleb. Council, any questions or comments for Caleb at this time? Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Page 52 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 27 of 50 Borton: Just a quick comment. Caleb, hats off to you. Making a perfect UDC might not be possible. We understand you are trying to make it more perfect and improve upon it. It's a continual process and doing it one bite at a time is still helpful. So, we just definitely appreciate the efforts in trying to shepherd this through. Step one. Simison: And while we have a second, this is a public hearing. If there is anyone online who would like to testify, if you could raise your hand so you can be queued in, but I will still leave this open for additional comments from Council or questions for Mr. Hood. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Question for either Caleb or maybe Bill. The -- the written testimony received from the Bernards suggested, you know, a mechanism that would allow for all public testimony, regardless of the time, to be collected and included as part of the public record, but maybe designated -- if it exceeded whatever the deadline is that there be some delineation that it may not be reviewed by Council. Is there any -- it seems like a good compromise, something that I'm open to, but I'm just curious if that creates any risk for us along our -- in our records or anything like that. Nary: So, Mr. Mayor, Members of Council, Council Member Cavener, I mean that's -- that's a great question. I think the intent of this ordinance, the way they are crafting it, is to put the public on notice that if you want to be sure it's read -- we do have to take everything that comes in regardless. So, it still becomes part of the record, but it's not unreasonable to have a cutoff and -- and so -- but no different -- you may occasionally call -- you will have somebody testify and, then, hand their written testimony in. You have heard it, but now you have it in writing, so there is nothing -- so, I don't see that as a problematic issue for the court. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, follow up. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: And I think that what -- what I'm trying to avoid and what I think is what the citizen is trying to avoid is a scenario where a citizen delivers testimony to the clerk and they say, sorry, it's past the cutoff time, we can't take it. Nary: Yeah. And I think, again, we could work a little bit on the language I guess with -- with Planning, but I think that -- the way I understood what they were going for was if you want it included as part of review, this is the time period it must be submitted. I don't -- we would not direct people not to -- not to put it in the record. We may have to work with the clerk's office to separate it out, so it's clear what was not reviewed. The concern I have is there could be one, there could be ten pieces of information and you may have read some of them, because you have the time to review it. I don't really want to prevent the Council from reviewing anything. I think what we are trying to get to on this ordinance Page 53 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 28 of 50 is to tell the public if you submit it by this date it will -- it will most likely be reviewed. If you submit it after this date it may not be reviewed and so I don't -- if the Council has the time and they read it all and they read everything up to one minute before the meeting, that's fine. Cavener: Sure. Nary: But we may have to look at that and figure out a way to separate and clarify, so a court would know we didn't look at that. Cavener: Right. Nary: You know, I can recall once where we had a letter that was submitted during the rebuttal that no one had seen and -- and it actually caused a remand. So, it's an issue that can be problematic, but we will work on that with the Planning and the Clerk's office and how to identify that. Cavener: Good. Appreciate that. Thank you. Simison: Council, any further questions or comments for staff at this time? Okay. Well, this is a public hearing. I know we have at least one person ready to testify. If you could, please, state your name and address for the record and you will be recognized for three minutes. LaFever: Denise LaFever at 6706 North Salvia Way and one of my concerns is -- is that Susan was nicely put on the UDC focus group, that was something that was brought up, and when she -- Susan wasn't replaced. Liz Strader and your Council has worked with the Planning and Zoning to make that appropriate for her to have a replacement. My concern stands with 11 -- 11-5A-6 and 11-5-A-6E, 11-5A-6H. I really think those need to have further public comment. I'm not opposed, per se, to 11-5A-6C and 11-5A-6E, I just don't think they go far enough. The 500 feet, that's give or take. I would like to see a sign posted stating the date, the time, and the location of the meeting, along with a sign-in sheet with people to allow comments that get submitted with the application. My real issue stands with 11-5-A-6H and although they have -- there is nice comments on here that say the reason for the change, that doesn't actually go into the change and I view this change as an erosion of the public due process. It's not clear on here within the language -- it says any, but does any mean staff? Does any mean applicant? Does any mean agency? And I am just deeply concerned and I -- about the erosion of the due process for the citizens. I wholeheartedly agree with all the comments that Malissa Bernard made in her letter where she stated further that the citizens are at a disadvantage as some Council Members know and -- and staff know I have spent a lot of time to understand the process, to understand the public hearing, to understand UDC and really work to understand all this, so I could speak on behalf of different items. For the normal person to go back through and come up to that speed and have a fair process that they can be heard, I just don't want to see further violations of the due process, nor do I want to see where we go back through and it's typical in court where applicants or staff may Page 54 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 29 of 50 drop something at the very last moment where the applicant -- not the applicant, but the public can't respond to it and I don't think that's what we want as a city. I -- I have found with the city and working with the city and City Council that it's always been nice that our Council folks are willing to listen, willing to go to coffee, willing to talk and I would just like to see UDC language that supports that and, furthermore, when we had talked about this with Susan and Sally and some others and what we would have liked to see is that all of the documents necessary to make a decision, including staff reports, P&Z comment, all agencies were submitted and, then, the public was allowed, you know, over a week and five days to literally comment on it before it went to Council. I see this as a backwards move. That's all I have. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions? And maybe a comment before I open up for questions is that I do think that the efforts we have made to require things to be published on Wednesday help give at least that week time frame for review, for the comments to be received, and at least on -- you know, on the 6-H issue I think that we have taken reasonable steps to try to improve that process, even through our noticing of agendas to make that possible. But any other questions for -- okay. Thank you very much. Madam Clerk, do we have anyone else raise their hand to testify? Weatherly: Mr. Mayor, we did not. Simison: Okay. This is a public hearing -- Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Mr. Borton. Borton: Yeah. The only question that jumped out in review of this in preparation that I wanted to ask legal counsel was on that 6-H, I think it's written that it applies to everybody and anybody, which could include the applicant, so is there -- the applicant I think has different rights than a member of the public. So, comment on that if we have any concern as written in this application. Nary: Mr. Mayor, Members of Council, Council Member Borton, you know, I mean I am a little concerned about shall and I think that's what's prompting the conversation, because you are right, I mean ultimately -- and this is an internal debate on due process that we always have. Ultimately the application is between the property owner and the city and everybody else is a commenter, whether they are an adjacent property owner, just an interested citizen, an HOA or whatever, they are all just commenters. Ultimately the last word goes to the applicant for a reason and that's where I think Mr. Borton is talking about is, you know, you have a situation that on the Tuesday before -- the Monday before noon a very well thought out public statement is made that has -- is refutable by the applicant and if we were to hold this strict line where the applicant couldn't provide written testimony about it, he can only come and testify about it, but, then, when he finishes and hands you the written document of what you just read -- said to you, are we going to take it. My view is we would take it. I think -- I know we are trying to make sure the public has plenty of Page 55 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 30 of 50 opportunity to participate and I think that's the right thing to do, but we also have to remember that ultimately the property owner-applicant is the person whose rights -- the court is going to be extremely concerned if we infringe on that due process. The opportunity to be heard is what the rest of the public has and I think we are providing that. So, I wouldn't say that the applicant couldn't submit something in writing less than 36 hours before the hearing, because, again, I don't know when it came in. If it comes in at five minutes to 12:00 they are not foreclosed from responding to it and they can't only be required to do it in a public testimony, because there may be pictures, examples, or something else that needs to be included. So, I do think we will have to figure out how to word that to address that concern, because, again, we do want the public to be able to participate, but the applicant always has a right to respond to it and should be able to provide it to you in writing to do that. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: I really appreciate that direction and if the word shall becomes should, that might be more accurate with what we actually would be able to do in practice. I think one of the remedies also for Council -- if it's an applicant who provides things very late, the Monday afternoon, Tuesday morning type of submittal from an applicant, which might cause understandable concern from the public, the Council always has the opportunity to just continue it and that could be one way we can help control 11th hour submittals, at least from --from an applicant is we need time to review everything. We can continue matters. Hood: So, Mr. Mayor? Simison: Mr. Hood. Hood: If I can just comment on that last point. So, Council Borton, that is on the table to discuss with the UDC focus group. I know you received some comments on some projects in the recent past about, you know, 2:00 p.m. I -- you know, I stayed up all night preparing my testimony and, then, the applicant revises their site plan, now my comments aren't valid anymore. You know, how is a person supposed to keep up when a new -- new application, essentially, is submitted the day of the hearing. So, that's on the table. What's reasonable. Is it ten days before, so that gives staff and the public and elected officials time to review that, but that is something we are kicking around, again, with phase two is -- now this isn't so much written testimony, but -- but changes to a plan and submitting that. So, in the same vein, though. So, I just wanted to let you know that that is also being considered. Just-- Mr. Mayor, if I may,just one of the points that Ms. LaFever brought up -- we did at Mrs. Susan Karnes' request appoint Annette Alonso to the UDC focus group. That's who Susan requested be her replacement and she did participate in the first meeting of that UDC focus group. So, I just wanted to circle back on that -- on that comment. Simison: Council, any further questions or comments or do I have a motion? Page 56 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 31 of 50 Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Question I guess for Caleb or Bill. What -- what's the direction, then, that we need from Council to -- are we -- are we looking to adopt what's being presented as a whole, less the code enforcement piece that's been requested to be held back? Is it prepare a resolution for it? What's -- what is the next step that staff is seeking from Council? Nary: So, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Cavener, so the next step is to prepare the actual ordinance that will come before you for approval. This is the opportunity, if you either need more time, want to make some changes that you would like to see in the written ordinance, like in 11-5A-6H, Council Member Borton, is suggesting that the language should say should be submitted for inclusion, not shall be submitted for inclusion. So, that way there is some discretion to that. If there is another section regarding either the footage or the days or whatever, this is the time we will still bring back a final form for you. Cavener: Thank you. Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Caleb, have you had any discussion with our two absent Council Members about any of this? Hood: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Cavener, certainly Councilman Perreault is my Council liaison and we have had several conversations through the whole process. She's also on that UDC focus group round two, so she's been kind of my main point of contact, along with the Mayor's office, on -- on some of these things, so -- Council Woman Strader, I -- off the top of my head I don't remember having -- certainly no one-on-one conversations. It seems like maybe -- maybe she sent an e-mail as we were going through that workshop process, but nothing of late. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, follow up? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Caleb, in terms of timing for you, part of my preference is to -- I know we have got two Council Members and I recognize, you know, if you are not here for the meeting you sometimes miss the opportunity to speak up, but if there is no -- no rush to maybe continue this for a week, take in the conversation that we have had here tonight, maybe allow us as a body to make any proposed changes, to bring that back next week and give our two absent members an opportunity to provide any of their insight as well. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Page 57 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 32 of 50 Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: The sentiment makes sense. It doesn't sound like there is urgency that one week causes a problem. The public hearing very well may close and we can delay discussion until that -- until next week. Nary: Mr. Mayor, your hearing next week on both work session and your regular session are pretty lengthy, but your 9/1 hearings are not. So, you might want to wait two weeks just to make sure you don't get overwhelmed with hearings. Simison: I guess to Mr. Borton's point, if it's not a public hearing -- if they close the public hearing what is the --just discussion on a potential motion at that point in time by Council? And, then, would they have to reopen the public hearing to make modifications or not really? Nary: So, yeah, if they are going to make modifications to what's there in two weeks they will have to reopen the public hearing to do that -- to make those directions. But, again, if -- just trying to figure out how to make sure you are not having a room full of people while you want to have a deliberative discussion about it. So, certainly your choice. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, question for Mr. Nary then. If under 11-5A-6H we make that change to should as opposed to shall, does that require this to remain open for public comment? Nary: So -- I apologize. So, if you are only talking about all of you and not getting additional feedback from the public about those changes, you don't need a public hearing. Again, I -- all I know is that it's a fairly lengthy agenda. I don't know how long that means and how long this discussion with the other two Council Members might be. So, yeah, you wouldn't need to open a public hearing just to make some changes, if it's only your -- your group doing that. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Borton: Thank you. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Mr. Nary or Mr. Mayor, any issues with having this on our 9/1 workshop or does it need to be on our main meeting? Or do you have a preference? Nary: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, it doesn't matter, because you're only basically giving direction to bring an ordinance back, so your workshop's fine, too. Page 58 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 33 of 50 Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: So, I got a thumbs up from the Council President, so I move that we continue Item 4, the UDC text amendment H-2020-0072 to our 9/1 workshop. Simison: And, sorry, were we going to close the public hearing and move the item? Bernt: No, it's already been closed, hasn't it? Cavener: Boy, Mr. Mayor, we are -- we are sloppy tonight. My apologies. Simison: Okay. Just wanted to make sure we were closing it first and, then, moving it to that point, so -- Cavener: Mr. Mayor, if I may? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I move we close the public hearing on H-2020-0072. Bernt: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Those opposed nay. The ayes have it. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I move that we continue Item H-2022-0072 to the 9/1 workshop. Bernt: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to continue Item H-2020-0072 to the September 1st workshop. Is there discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Those opposed nay. The ayes have it. Thank you very much. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Simison: Council, how are we doing? Do we need a break before we go into these next couple items? Okay. Let's -- let's go ahead and take a five minute break and we will reconvene at 8.00 p.m. Five minutes. 8.00 p.m. Page 59 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 04 of 50 (Recess: 7:54 p.m. to 8:04 p.m.) 5. Public Hearing for 2020 Comprehensive Plan Policy Prioritization (H- 2020-0073) by City of Meridian Planning Division A. Request: To amend the text of the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan by adding priority levels and assigning responsible department leads to the existing policies of the Plan. This amendment makes no revisions to the text of the Plan, except to add priorities and responsible leads for the policies adopted in December of 2019. Simison: Council, we will call the meeting back from recess. Just for the record it's 8:04 and we will turn to Item 5 on the agenda, public hearing for the 2020 Comprehensive Plan prioritization, H-2020-0073. I will open this public hearing with staff comments and turn this over to Mr. McClure. McClure: Mayor, Council, thank you for having me here tonight. Can you hear me all right? Good evening. I'm here tonight to discuss a Comprehensive Plan text amendment with you. First, though, and very briefly, the current Comprehensive Plan was adopted in December of last year. There are 492 policies and 380 action items. The new Comprehensive Plan is organized by themes, which came directly out of the public outreach of that effort. The plan is really two documents, the regular text policies and map, which is the Comprehensive Plan. It's forward thinking. And, then, the existing conditions report is really focused on who we are today and where we have been as to the amendments of the Comprehensive Plan. I won't linger here, mostly for anyone in the public, but this slide here describes why we have a Comprehensive Plan. In summary, we plan because we are told to for the community good and to incorporate the community's vision. You can see there are 17 required components of the state enabling legislation in the -- on the right side of the screen. Again, this is why we are here tonight. This amendment doesn't change the future land use map and it doesn't revise any of the text. The purpose of the update is to add priorities and responsibilities to the policies. This is needed for transparency to the public to understand our priorities and to be efficient. We also said we would do it, which is incorporated right into the text of the new plan. The text on the right side of the presentation you can see here is straight out of chapter one under next steps and I have highlighted the relevant sections in red text. I can't go through all the policies. We did a number of them. But you have the complete information in your packets. On a high level and as a method of process, though, these policies are responsibility for and proposed by consensus. I think that's pretty significant. We have shared them with city leadership and discussed what was best for everyone. A few areas they received some proposed tweaks when we do the first real update, maybe next year. As an example some of the action items are too big for just one department to lead, more than likely we will want to split some of those up. On the right you can see a breakdown of the policies by topic and on the next slide you will be able to see them by a few other ways. Here are the policies by lead and priority and, then, ongoing by department. These are rolling packets, both in the application letter and the staff report. Page 60 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 35 of 50 The one -- the ones with a time frame are sort of like projects, things that need to be done more comprehensively and the ones with ongoing or more day to day are specific to development review. Lastly, on this and for next steps, priorities will help you inform other planning and budgeting efforts. We have a few highlights for you. Before I show you how these can look in the final document, the golden objectives provide context for many of the 380 action items below them. These action items often vary wildly in scope, complexity, and frequency and so the goals and objectives are not prioritized they are context. Additionally, responsible lead and support departments shown our simple summaries of those below them for the goals and objectives. Really -- and, for example, the goals and objectives are populated with responsible leads so that when you sort by departments you don't lose that context and only see the actions, you retain and keep and see the goals and objectives with the action. Next the party periods shown or proposed and are general, much like the comp plan. This is our historical practice. These are really intended to be from the point of adoption or if there are changes since the adoption within -- some other sort of addendum -- or amendment. At the July meeting before the Planning and Zoning Commission part of the recommendation was to include priorities for the ongoing items. In staff's perspective this doesn't work very well and I did not likely do a good enough job going into the detail as to why. Ongoing items are at every opportunity. If it's development related, then, we view them with every application. If there is an action described with a yearly project, then, it's with that yearly effort. If it's coordination with ACHD, then, we do that at every chance we get. These are for now and not for big blocks of sort of abstract time. We want to do something else with those and apply some sort of time period to them, so we will have to look at some other revisions to the text to consider that. If we were to move forward with this amendment as proposed this is what you would likely see in the findings. This is formatted for the new Comprehensive Plan. You can see on the right there there is two new columns. One would lead, one would support, and, then, down at the bottom there is some notations that describe some of the acronyms and various time periods. I do have one slide after this which is related, but not strictly related to the action. So, with that I will stand for any questions or discussion. Simison: Thank you, Brian. Council, any questions or comments for Mr. McClure? Okay. This is a public hearing. Madam Clerk, do we have anyone signed up to testify on this item? Weatherly: Mr. Mayor, we do not. Simison: Okay. And the last time I checked we didn't have -- we do have a hand raised? Okay. If there is a hand raised, we can go ahead and bring them into the room and ask them to state their name and address for the record. Weatherly: Denise, go ahead with your name and address, please. LaFever: Denise LaFever at 6706 North Salvia Way and I just want to say I think Brian did a really good job with the presentation. I really appreciate the way he laid out his report and his presentation. So, I'm for making some priorities that are based on the staff meeting. That's all I have to say. Page 61 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 36 of 50 Simison: Thank you, Denise. Council, any questions for Denise? Okay. Thank you very much. Do I have a motion to close the public hearing or is there any further discussion? Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, I move that we close the public hearing for the Comprehensive Plan policy prioritization, H-2020-0073. Cavener: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any discussion on the item? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Any opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, question for Brian. This -- this is just to bring back to Council an ordinance or what format will this be in to -- for us -- for us to adopt? Is there something that we take further action on and what format does that look like? Simison: Ask Mr. Nary to respond to that. Nary: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Hoaglun, so we would bring back a resolution with those changes and, then, that would be attached to the resolution. Hoaglun: So, Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I move that we adopt the 2020 Comprehensive Plan policy prioritization, H- 2020-0073 by the Planning Division -- Division and that a resolution be prepared for Council consideration at our next meeting. Cavener: Second the motion. Nary: Mr. Mayor? Simison: I have a motion and a second and a comment. Nary: Yes. The next meeting deadline was today, so it would have to be at least September 1st. Mr. Mayor, if I might amend my motion to -- that it be adopted as I laid out in the motion, except the date be September 1 st. Cavener: Second agrees. Page 62 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 37 of 50 Simison: And the second agrees. Is there any discussion on the motion? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I just -- I wanted to reiterate and thank Denise for sharing some comments towards Brian. Brian, appreciate your good work on this. We don't get to see you very often and now I guess we only see you what's on the computer screen, but we appreciate your due diligence on this project. Bernt: Ditto. Thank you, Luke. Simison: Okay. Hearing no further discussion, we do have a motion. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Those opposed nay. The ayes have it. The motion is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Simison: Thank you, Brian. And now I think we will turn it back over to Mr. Hood, if he is going to swap places with Mr. McClure. I can't tell if they are -- DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS [Action Item] 6. Community Development: Presentation of Ada County Highway District's Draft 2021-2025 Integrated Five-Year Work Plan Simison: Okay. Item 8 is -- or Item 6 is Department Report, Community Presentation, on the Ada County Highway District's 2021-2025 integrated five year work plan. I will turn this over to Mr. Hood. Hood: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of Council. I'm going to talk to you about the draft -- initial draft of the ACHD 2021 to 2025 integrated five year work plan. Given that an acronym, so IFYWP. That was -- you had a pretty lengthy packet item for this topic and we are certainly not going to go through it page by page. I probably should have put it in my memo, but that wasn't the expectation of you either, but you had the information should you choose to -- to go into it at that detail. Earlier this year the city did send to ACHD our roadway intersection and community program priority requests and asked them to consider that as they drafted this is IFYWP. ACHD recently released that initial draft and is now seeking our feedback, not just the City of Meridian, but there are other stakeholders in the county as well and I will just draw your attention --ACHD has actually responded to the spreadsheet that we send them with our priority requests and responded to each of our priority rankings by providing us an update to where they stand in their process. So, if you have your packet open and want to go to page 151 , 1 would encourage you to do that. I'm going to actually go there here in a minute with you and -- and draw your attention to a project or two, but that's our -- that's our list that we sent to ACHD earlier this spring and they provided comments and updated that to just let us know where Page 63 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 38 of 50 all those projects stand in their process, so -- so, staff has reviewed the draft integrated five year work plan and discussed with the Transportation Commission on August 3rd. Essentially, besides an interim signal, that they are -- they have added to the program at McMillan and Black Cat -- so, near the new Owyhee High School being accelerated into 2022, there is really not a whole lot of change. So, they are adding another year to the program, but none of our projects were substantially delayed or substantially advanced, everything just kind of going through that process. So, there is really no change that staff is really wanting to bring to your attention as it relates to Meridian anyways. There are certainly some other changes in the program, but as it relates to Meridian it's kind of what I would have expected I guess. Staff did ask for feedback from the Transportation Commission, again, at that August 3rd meeting on the overall integrated five year work plan, but in particular we asked them to look at a concept to potentially move two of our projects down on our priority list that we sent to ACHD earlier in the year. In particular there are two projects on South Ten Mile Road that staff brought to the Transportation Commission's attention. The section of Ten Mile between Victory and Overland, which is currently the city's number six highest priority project and is planned for construction in 2022 and into 2023 and, then, the second project, but it's related, because they are designing them concurrently -- would be that intersection at Ten Mile and Victory and that's the city's number 17 highest priority on the list that we have submitted and, again, planned for construction concurrently with the roadway widening project. The Transportation Commission did review it, but had no comments or recommendations that they asked me to carry forward to you all tonight on those -- on Ten Mile or the initial drafts of the integrated five year work plan. There is one other thing I just want to draw to your attention also on the August 3rd meeting. We had a member of the public attend with some concerns about the Eagle project between Amity -- yeah, Eagle project between Amity and Victory and so wanted to bring -- if you can -- if you did go there to page 151 in your packet, that's priority number five. So, fairly high up is the roadway widening of Eagle Road there between Amity and Victory and the intersection is number 26 on our priority list. That individual had some concerns with some of the design elements, a roundabout, the way they are crossing pedestrians, but Brian McClure actually talked to you about this last fall a little bit about how they -- Locust Grove and Eagle Road, they are trying some kinds of newer design concepts and, obviously, Brian's here, so if you have any questions on that Eagle Road project I will probably defer to him. But I wanted to call that out and just let you know that we have been back in contact as well with Albertsons, who was kind of off of our radar for the past almost two years. They are back on scene just as ACHD is about ready to wrap up design, they are at 99 percent, getting ready to go out to bid and construct this project this next year -- this next fiscal year. So, again, if you look at that it's -- it's very late in that whole design process, but I just want to bring that to your attention, since there are some concerns with what -- how that -- that project or two -- the intersection at -- at Amity and the roadway widening project towards Victory and the current status of that. But I just wanted to kind of draw it your attention a little bit. Again, the Transportation Commission, though, didn't really have anything that they wanted me to say. Yeah, we should send a letter to ACHD, but if you direct me to do so I need to do that by August 21 st, so that's, you know, coming up really quick, so I need that direction tonight. We can't continue this out to September 1 st. So, any -- any direction -- if you want to send a letter, please -- please let me know what that is and, Page 64 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 39 of 50 again, I need to send it out this week. With that, Mr. Mayor -- if you have any questions on any of it -- but, again, if you go to page 151 and just kind of go through -- and if you would like me to run through that spreadsheet with you we can, but if you look at the -- kind of the middle -- middle to the right two-thirds of the -- of the pages there, you have got the -- you know, design year, right of way acquisition year, and construction year. That's what everyone cares about what year does it actually get built. We also have ACHD's response. So, thatACHD response column is the one -- if you are curious about any of our projects and where they sit at -- in ACHD process, page 151 through 150 -- it's just a couple of pages there -- you have that information. And with that I will stand for any questions you may have. Simison: Thank you, Caleb. And, Council, I'm just going to do -- add on to what Caleb talked about, because I did have the opportunity to sit down with Director Wong from ACHD on Friday and a couple of things to point out. A, I think you are going to hear next week, if I'm not mistaken, Caleb, that we will hear from someone from the Tuscany area regarding the Eagle-Amity issues. I think that's going to be presented to you all next week. However, that will not be in time for any consideration for a letter to ACHD at this point in time on the five year work plan specifically. I did alert the director to potential some thoughts may come from us regarding the Ten Mile projects. And I think the point here is the city is the one -- those projects, honestly, if we -- if you look at them there is not a lot of Meridian residents that benefit from those projects on the south side of Ten Mile, as we don't have development down in that area. They really are for others, but they do count against Meridian in our allocation of projects for the city. So, if that's something that we -- may not be on our priority list as much as other projects and maybe something we want to consider sending in the letter for further comments on this. But part of our conversation with the director was the need to probably have a joint meeting, because despite Linder Road overpass being number two on our list, I have heard that ACHD doesn't see it as a high priority from the city, because they haven't heard it directly from Council in a face-to-face format, so -- Bernt: Tomorrow morning? I'm available. Simison: Yeah. So -- so, we will -- we will need to have a joint meeting with ACHD to talk maybe specifically about that topic with them. In addition, the Eagle and Amity was something that I did bring up with the director and he is going to be getting back to me as far as where they are in that process and this does go to issues that were raised regarding Eagle, Amity, with Albertsons, as well as others, but otherwise that are going to now be likely be proposed at the Hill, which, again, is within a half a mile. So, there is -- there is some other issues, but I don't know that it impacts the five year work plan discussion at this point in time, because I still think that we believe that that's an important project to have done. It's just important to have it done correctly. I think that's the more important conversation. But if there are comments regarding the Ten Mile corridor specifically, if we want to send a letter on that I think that's right, at least want to make sure Council weighs in on that topic tonight or anything else that you think is relevant for a letter to ACHD. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Page 65 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 40 of 50 Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Maybe help me with a little bit of clarification. We talked about Ten Mile. assume you are talking Ten Mile south of Victory. Simison: I -- I would put it south of the Overland-Ten Mile connection at this point in time, because that's -- that's where that project really hits is the Victory one. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, a couple of comments. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I'm always happy to meet with our friends from the highway district, but I can recount I think at least the last two or three times that we have gotten together the subject of the Linder Road overpass was discussed at length and enthusiasm from our body shared with them, but if we need to meet with them again so they can hear from us that's fine, but perhaps we include -- instead of doing a letter just from you, Mr. Mayor, maybe it's something that's signed by all of us and we include within that what I believe -- I think is pretty strong enthusiasm for the Linder Road overpass. That way they get it in an official letter with a request to discuss what that may look like from their perspective when we meet. So, we got some framework around what we are going to be talking about. On the Ten Mile piece, I think I'm in agreement with you, Mr. Mayor, for the most part. I do know that on our -- our 2020 rankings that both the Transportation Commission I think that we have -- we have approved has Victory and Overland as number six. I'm not quite sure if I wrap my head fully around removing that particular piece, but clearly Amity to Lake Hazel and so on and so forth does seem to make sense. I'm not so beholden that we need to hold on to the priority ranking for Victory and Overland -- or Victory --Ten Mile, excuse me, between Victory and Overland, but I think it is more of a priority than -- than the other intersections that run south. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I would agree with Mr. -- Mr. Cavener. Also just to clarify, are we -- did you say that we weren't going to discuss this evening at least at the minimum a letter in regard to that pedestrian crossing that the citizen had concerns with, along with roundabouts, or are we going to reserve that for next week? Simison: I believe that would be the intention, since we are -- I would encourage us to stay focused on the five year work plan, unless we want to move that project -- Bernt: No, that's fine. Simison: Yeah. And we did discuss that with ACHD about that potentially being another joint meeting topic, depending on where it is in their process and their willingness to Page 66 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 41 of 50 engage further if Council's desire is to do so. Is there any other comments or direction for Mr. Hood at this time from any other members of Council? If not, then, what I would suggest, if it's okay, is that we draft up a letter that I can sign specifically related to Ten Mile and focus on areas south of the intersection corridor of Victory and Overland as to not being priority -- as -- as important priorities for the City of Meridian at this time. Cavener: Okay. I'm good with that. Simison: Okay. Mr. Hood, I think that means tomorrow morning, just so you know, since I'm out -- Hood: I will get Mr. Miles on that. Thank you. Simison: All right. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: We, then, send a follow-up piece about Linder or you will communicate -- staff will communicate that with ACHD staff and -- I heard Council President Bernt under his breath say can they meet you tomorrow morning and I thought it was somewhat tongue in cheek, but I do think we -- if that's what they need to hear from us we should be meeting with them sooner rather than later. Simison: Yes. It is the intention. I -- my -- my guess is that we list the next Tuesday and see if there is a second agenda item that we want to have for that, but we can start the process. It was on my list to talk with the Council President tomorrow about, about getting that moving forward. Cavener: Great. Thank you both. Simison: Mr. Hood, are you? All right. Awesome. 7. Community Development: Presentation of Results of Open Space Study Survey Simison: Moving on to our last item from Community Development this evening. This is Item 7, Community Development presentation, results of the open space survey and I'm going to turn this over to Cameron. Arial: Good morning. Or good morning. Good evening, everyone. Good to be back with you. Everybody hear me okay? All right. I'm going to go ahead and share my screen and get the presentation up for you. Let me know if that's -- can you see that okay? All right. Mr. Mayor, Members of Council, it's good to be with you. As we have previously -- previously discussed and in conversation with -- continued conversation around the Page 67 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page"of 50 Comprehensive Plan, one of the items that came out of the Comprehensive Plan that was a --you know, a priority point to explore further was the open space issue that we continue to hear throughout the process from the public and so as staff we have been working on that and wanted to report to you this evening the results of that survey. As you know, you know, this has been a topic in land use applications, you know, in many of our public hearings and not to confuse what's going on with Caleb's open space UDC group, but certainly related is kind of this survey pertaining to what our citizens think of open space. This also pertains to our current strategic plan, Item 1-C-3, which talks about open space and the preservation of it and so based on that we wanted to really kind of assess citizens' understanding of open space, what they -- what they -- what they think it means and what their preferences are around it. Also gauge kind of their willingness to pay for it and -- and, then, also kind of as a third wheel is to educate them on what the possible open space types exist. So, kind of a multifaceted purpose behind the survey. So, as such, you know, it wasn't -- specifically it wasn't intended to be a -- you know, a random sampling, scientifically derived survey, it was meant to be broad and sent out to as many Meridian citizens as possible to gather as much information, as well as to educate. So, it's important to just caveat this data that it's not generalizable to all of Meridian and Meridian citizenry, it's not, you know, scientific in that regard, but we do -- we certainly can say definitively that of those surveyed. These are the results. I am pleased -- very pleased with the number of responses. We had over at the end of the day over 1 ,500 responses. So, you know, again, that's -- that's a good response and that certainly the -- the data is useful. So, again, we are trying to understand what open space means, because, again, through the -- the public hearing process and through, you know, the Comprehensive Plan outreach it meant a lot of different things to a lot of different people and so we really wanted to kind of hone in on that. It is important to note, too, that we did partner with Boise State and Idaho Policy Institute. Many of you know Dr. Greg Kildare and his team and so they have helped us assess this, run the cross-tabulation and present the results. So, I'm going to go ahead and just dive in real quick. This is kind of just that -- some factoids, if you will, around the survey itself. So, we ran it for just over a month. Tried to leave it out there to make sure folks could -- you know, gave people adequate time to respond. Some noteworthy things. As they ranked their responses you can see here kind of what was folks' number one choice. You can see there a nature reserve type concept got the most, number one. Both public parks, multi-space, outdoor urban spaces, pathways, working farms and, then, preservation of historical or cultural significant property. This is an important slide. Really what we found when you kind of boiled it down and ranked it, you know, so the first place, second place, third place, fourth place rankings and so forth, that 81 percent supported purchasing property for open space and when you boil that down even further, you can see there there is this kind of a, you know, dividing line, if you will. All of them received over 50 percent or a simple majority, but you see that, you know, our public parks in particular, folks at the 82 percentile really were willing to support purchasing parks, nature preserves, and pathways at a high rank and would just focus you on when they talked about what funding source to purchase open space, 48 percent of the survey folks identified development impact fees as their number one preference. So,just real quick I found these interesting that I thought we would share. Sixty-six percent of respondents were female, 67 were between the ages of 25 and 54. Seventy-one percent had a bachelor's degree or higher and 90 percent owned a single Page 68 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 4O of 50 family home. So, again, as we kind of ran into -- ran the cross-tabs on property purchase, you know, you see, again, 81 percent of those surveyed supported purchasing property of some type of open space. So, again, the high -- high -- high level finding. We found it interesting and wanted to report based on length of time, meaning how long they have lived in the city. This was -- this was interesting that those that -- that lived longer in Meridian were less likely to support. Now, got to kind of caveat that, again, the support was very high regardless, but there was a difference. So, for example, if -- if folks had lived here three to four years they were at 84 percent and that dropped down if you lived ten years or longer. So, something there to consider. Age, again, on purchasing property, you know, this -- the -- this 25 to 34 year block was our peak at 87 percent support for purchase, but still strong support across all age demographics. And, then, just another note -- noteworthy one, folks that had a bachelor's degree supported 87 percent and, then, you know, less likely to support if they had a high school degree. As far as parks are concerned, kind of drill down into that. I found that interesting that three to four year -- people that lived in Meridian three to four years strong support at 88 percent. Again, kind of across the board folks supported parks, but saw that uptick there with that demographic. Age. Again, that 25 to 34 year old folks, that peaked at 91 percent support. I think -- I think that's all I want to do for there on parks. So, on nature preserve. So, again, length of time in Meridian, this one was a little different. We found that if they, you know, had lived less than one year they were more likely to support that at 84 percent and, again, longer than ten years at 78 percent. So, not a huge difference, but, you know, something, you know, interesting there that new comers may support just, you know, raw ground, you know, preserved -- preservation of that type of open space. In this -- in this tab, again, the -- even this younger crowd -- although there weren't a ton of respondents in this demographic, the 18 to 25, 1 better -- you know, need to mention that. But 94 percent of them did support purchasing property for nature preserve open space. Pathways. Again, so this was that -- that the -- kind of the tail end of that -- that -- the top tier, if you will, for supporting open space -- the purchase of open space. Kind of followed along the same lines as parks to a large degree and -- but you do see kind of housing playing a -- playing a role. You know, we are at peaks here with those folks that -- that rent. That connectivity -- you know, and that -- that kind of seemed logical where maybe they live in more dense areas of town, they want to be connected and not so auto -- auto centric. So, on the funding question, again, number one ranking went to the development impact fee for using that as a funding mechanism. Let's see. This was an interesting one. I think you found a higher support with folks that had -- are newer to the city, as opposed to those that have been longer to the city, less inclined to support there. Also that -- that held true with the age demographic as well. The -- the older crew tend to support there. And so, again, in conclusion, you know, of those surveyed -- again, this can't be, you know, extrapolated across the entire citizenry, but of those surveyed it was very clear that citizens value open space to the extent that they are, you know, largely willing to pay for it and, then, we see peaks with parks, nature reserves, and pathways as those that received the highest percentages, but with all of them -- you know, nearly all of them receiving, you know, majority. And, then, just finally that development impact fees were the -- the funding mechanism of choice. So, with that certainly we can dive into any aspect of the survey that you would like. Hopefully that was a quick summary, but Page 69 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 44 of 50 certainly interested in your thoughts on this and how you would like staff to move forward, if at all, with this information. Mr. Mayor, thank you for the time and open to discussion. Simison: Thank you, Cameron. Council, any questions for Cameron? Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Yeah. Quick question, Cameron. Right on that very last one on the conclusion I was trying to parse out, you know, that -- that figure of 48 percent, you know, of respondents ranked the use of impact fees as their -- as their most favored use of -- of paying for open space and, then, it says over bonding and using the city's reserves. So, how was that question worded or what were their options of -- of impact fees? I mean sometimes people think bonding someone else is still paying the bill, but, you know, city reserves is only adding the money, just spend -- spend from the savings account, it's still all taxpayer dollars, but I was just curious as to how that was worded. Cameron: Yeah. Let me pull up the exact question, Councilman Hoaglun. Great question. One moment here. Take me just a second. Yeah. This was a ranking question, if I'm not mistaken. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Cameron, if it's helpful I have got it in front of me. I could -- I could read it if that's helpful. Arial: Oh, sure. Yeah. Yeah. I'm just pulling it up, but go ahead and I'm -- I will just share that now, so you guys can see that. Cavener: The question was, yeah, in order for the city to acquire any of your preferred open space choices, how would you, or those in your household, want that decision to be made. First option is City Council approval of development impact fees. New development pays a fee for open space purchases. Second option is public vote. Property tax levy. Tax imposed on Meridian properties to purchase open space. Option three. City Council authorizes use of General Fund balance. City uses its surplus revenues to purchase open space. Or other is -- is the fourth option. Arial: So, that may be -- let me just elaborate -- and thank you, Councilman Cavener, for reading that off. Just to elaborate on that, so this was a ranking question, so you could select between one of these four and so as such the number one ranking was the impact fee one at 48 percent. That -- that number does not include your average -- you know, maybe that ranked second with a lot of people as well. But we figured we would just report the highest number one ranking one. Page 70 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 45 of 50 Hoaglun: Thank you. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Cameron, maybe -- maybe following on up that, do you have the numerical amount? So, I know we are talking percentages, but I think we -- the survey started I think with a little over 1,500. Do you have -- I mean typically with surveys the more questions you ask the more people drop off and so I don't know -- is it 40 percent of that 1,500 or is it a lower number? Arial: Yeah. Let me -- let me see if I can pull up the -- the exact number of responses on that question in particular. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Arial: I definitely know we have the -- Cavener: Cameron, it might be easier maybe just to send some of that stuff, too, later on. I don't want to -- I don't want you to feel like you have got to kind of go fishing for -- for me on that question. I just was curious if it's something you had offhand. Arial: Sure. No, I'm happy to follow up with you, Councilman Cavener, on that -- on that point. What was -- what was the number of respondents on it. I do -- I will say that, you know, we -- we did take all of the data, but, you know, there is -- there is, obviously, you know, you are -- you are speaking to, you know, survey attrition. So, we can -- I can get you that to make sure that, you know, at least that -- each of the numbers. I want to say that it was high, but we will -- we will get that definitively. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, a couple other questions if I may. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Cameron, I appreciate you bringing this. I know you and I had some spirited conversations about surveys and straw polls and statistically validated, so this -- this information is fascinating. My assumption is -- because I appreciate you sending me the questions. We didn't boil down survey respondents based on where they lived in Meridian. Do we have anything that's one level deeper are you aware of? Arial- We -- we actually do and just for the sake of time I didn't -- I didn't put that slide in. We do -- Brian McClure did provide a heat map. I can send that to you as well. Cavener: Awesome. Page 71 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 46 of 50 Arial: Not surprisingly, most of the respondents were in the north and south, but we did get a northwest, southeast where a lot of our growth is and a lot of our residences are. But I can certainly share that with you as well. It's -- it's safe to say that we got a broad -- a very broad response geographically. Cavener: Great. Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Cameron, a question that you asked has really piqued my interest and it wasn't captured in the slide, so I'm hoping maybe you can give us some insight. I think it was Q2 where you were asking the -- the respondents about if they would support purchasing property for open -- for open space and you have yes, no, or don't know. I would be curious to know what the response is from that. But, moreover, if they say no, we ask them what city services those in the household would prefer that the city be focused on and I would love -- again, I don't know how many answers you got, because when you invite kind of a narrative I'm sure you got a whole slate of different things. But I would love to see what our public is saying that they would want us spending our dollars on as opposed to open space. Arial: Yeah. Happy to -- happy to get you that -- that data as well. And it's -- it's -- if there is -- that is some of the follow up. If you want me to come back and present that type of, you know, drill down specifically, happy to do that as well. Simison: And to dovetail with this, we do have the draft city survey results back, which think you will be seeing those in the next three weeks here, Council. So, I don't know the open space was listed as an item, but at least it will tell you where the residents think as a general viewpoint -- Cavener: Sure. Simison: -- compared to what you may have heard in this survey. Different people. Different questions. Not necessarily can't -- hard to cross tab the two. So, you are getting the results of both of them within a three week period likely. Cavener: Wonderful. That's great news. Simison: Council, anything further for Cameron on the item at this time? Thanks, Camera. I think it's more digestion at this point in time and perhaps one off conversations for anything else as we move forward. Arial: Yeah. Understood. Thank you, Mr. Mayor, and Members of Council. Appreciate the time and happy to discuss as you need and provide anymore data, but, yeah, look forward to the follow up. Simison: All right. Thank you very much. Page 72 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page" of 50 Arial: Thank you. ORDINANCES [Action Item] 8. Ordinance No. 20-1888: An Ordinance (H-2020-0009 — Lavender Heights Subdivision) for Annexation of a Parcel of Land Located in the SW '/4 of Section 32, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, as Described in Attachment "A" and Annexing Certain Lands and Territory, Situated in Ada County, Idaho, and Adjacent and Contiguous to the Corporate Limits of the City of Meridian as Requested by the City of Meridian; Establishing and Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification of 55.14 Acres of Land From RUT To R-4 (Low Density Residential) Zoning Designation (16.37 Acres); R-8 (Medium Density Residential) Zoning District (28.07 Acres); R-15 (Medium High Density Residential) Zoning District (3.25 Acres); and R-40 (High Density Residential) Zoning District (7.44 Acres) in the Meridian City Code; Providing that Copies of this Ordinance Shall be Filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as Required by Law; and Providing for a Summary of the Ordinance; and Providing for a Waiver of the Reading Rules; and Providing an Effective Date Simison: So, Council, that brings -- brings us to Item No. 8, Ordinance No. 20-1888. 1 will ask the Clerk to read this ordinance by title. Weatherly: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. This is Ordinance No. 20-1888, an Ordinance H-2020- 0009, Lavender Heights Subdivision, for annexation of a parcel of land located in the SW 1/4 of Section 32, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada county, Idaho, as described in Attachment "A" and annexing certain lands and territory, situated in Ada county, Idaho, and adjacent and contiguous to the corporate limits of the City of Meridian as requested by the City of Meridian; establishing and determining the land use zoning classification of 55.14 acres of land from RUT to R-4 (Low Density Residential) zoning designation (16.37 acres); R-8 (Medium Density Residential)zoning district (28.07 acres); R-15 (Medium High Density Residential) zoning district (3.25 acres); and R-40 (High Density Residential) zoning district (7.44 acres) in the Meridian City Code; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; and providing for a summary of the ordinance; and providing for a waiver of the reading rules; and providing an effective date. Simison: Council, you have heard this read by title. Is there anybody who would like it read in its entirety? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Page 73 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 48 of 50 Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move we approve Ordinance No. 20-1888, with suspension of rules. Bernt: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve the ordinance under suspension of the rules. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Those opposed nay. The ayes have it and the motion is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. 9. Ordinance No. 20-1889: An Ordinance Amending Meridian City Code Section 8-1-4(B)(1), Regarding Requirements for City of Meridian Use Zone Encroachment Permits; Adopting a Savings Clause; and Providing an Effective Date Simison: Item 9 is Ordinance No. 20-1889. I will ask the Clerk to read this ordinance by title. Weatherly: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. This is Ordinance No. 20-1889. An ordinance amending Meridian City Code, Section 8-1-f(b)(1) regarding requirements for City of Meridian use zone encroachment permits, adopting a savings clause and providing an effective date. Simison: Council, you have heard this ordinance read by title. Is there anyone that would like it read in its entirety? Seeing no one raise their hand. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move we approve Ordinance No. 20-1889 with suspension of rules. Bernt: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 9, Ordinance No. 20-1889 under suspension of rules. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Those opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. FUTURE MEETING TOPICS Simison: Council, we are on -- on to Item No. 10. Page 74 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page'9 of 50 Bernt: Future Meeting Topics. Simison: Oh, sorry. I skipped over that. Council, is there any item under future meeting topics? EXECUTIVE SESSION 10. Per Idaho Code 74-206A(1)(a) To deliberate on a labor contract offer or to formulate a counteroffer. Amended agenda to add Idaho Code 74-206(1)(f) Simison: Then I would love a motion on number -- Item No. 10. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I move that we go into Executive Session per Idaho Code 74-206A(1)(a) and 74- 206(a)(f). Cavener: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to adjourn into Executive Session. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, Clerk will call the roll. Roll call: Bernt, yea; Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, absent; Perreault, absent. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries. We adjourn into Executive Session. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (8:54 pm. to 10:03 p.m.) Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I move we come out of Executive Session. Hoaglun: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to come out of Executive Session. All those in favor say aye. Opposed nay. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Page 75 Meridian City Council Item#2. August 18,2020 Page 50 of 50 Cavener: Mr. Mayor, I move we adjourn. Hoaglun: Second. Simison: Motion and a second to adjourn. All those in favor? MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:03 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 9 / 1 / 2020 MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK Page 76 C � WE N DIAN --- IDAHO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Item Title: Future Meeting Topics - Public Forum (Up to 30 Minutes Maximum) Signing up prior to the start of the meeting is required. This time is reserved for the public to address their elected officials regarding matters of general interest or concern of public matters and is not specific to an active land use/development application. By law, no decisions can be made on topics presented under this public comment section, other than the City Council may request that the topic be added to a future meeting agenda for a more detailed discussion or action. The Mayor may also direct staff to further assist you in resolving the matter following the meeting Meeting Notes: r ftiv•vvti.:�}ivy•::?ti:::+:.k vv L t k r}:?: :.tick.t+L� �5 .:.i•ti x.••},{4�',?+`�::kk i:::'1:::�'.�:;:�::':?;':::: :r'�`�k••'•':;�r ry �k� } Lkr \vr}'. \}/Lrr # J�' ry ...k.... 4 L vv} �. ::\.:.::..::... 7 T f ,'?' k} ..Sv k r .`�}'.x.vk.:i?:v�'i`••..ri:::..�,v ••'. r'L� � ' 1 r r f �f $ }} ... ..v •.•.r•r.•..... r• .•....:••' •';. ... ...:..•: ? v � 'r' } L ' r r r v v v .. v..• v.. .... v.:....•......;..••... .. . r v .. r.... .•v.r;�:.•:....•• r}vk v./ k �{ \\ri� v } r r vi } ri k v v v / � r r{ rt v,}�}... r �..} .\ v\.v ..... .. v. ... .... ... .. ....r.. .. v }f,f t +� } r�r v v rk } v£ v } .. }kr r r}. .k yr yr �J" } y {{ rv\yr r v ... v.r r v.r... k.. v. v.. v. v v. / t. r v} � � '`i } {r #v {\\ .} r v v � {} r vl r .}vvi r t } v r r r v .r} { r}r�. \ .. ......r v vk..... ... .k.... ...•. •. ..,.....••. .•• •r..••..•.•..... ....... . v}yr .. x rk k � v }v }fir k v r ..}}. }} rv..v i kx r1.. .f. r {.. v..}, .}.v ri rvr r r v v r v...v.. ... .. .... .. f..v.. r...... ..r .f.r �..} r v a �} r v v �`v � .}vr r vl.r} \.} v .$ .} yr v v r r.. v. v v r v r ry v v./. ..I{.r.. vk k}�r.k........ v. v...... ... .. .. ...... r. �. x r .r .� , ��� a '� � � L 5�� r { .x .$# r { r.r v v.. .r v.r..r r}i rv....r v�..}i.l.k. v} v. ......... k.k r k.. .k r v }..... v v v.. } r v .� S "r ri v � L } Y.} � r..r v v v\.. v r ry .. ..} v �. ..k..•.•. �...\..••.... r .. ..k.. � .} � t}'{ t . r`t. . r � � � ,� k � � �. # r,. .r r c.f .... .k ,.....} .} .r s� k r � r 3� r ��r .r ,� � r s � � � �t s � ,.r t ^c. r f ... �. . . �... r ...k. . k�....... ,...� ,.k.. .k ..} r � .x# } } r �, r t � � '�, � � r,f� t.� r f r � r , , .. k. �,..•... ,.. v..•.... •...•.......},..•. ••.•..•.•..•.,,.... ...., ..�•..•.•.......k....•,...,..•. • ...••.•,.......,.......•.... r.. .....•..................•..r.. . r � � r }i k r .� r � v k .J r J.I.. k}v. 1..x .rv�.. v.k... v. v... v v v.v.. .. ...... ....... .. .. k} ry r r r .} f �S r } .�t r } v � { ,f k }} k � f.� .f r i r ..,r .r .}., k. .\. ..•...•...•.... ••!r�'+''r?.';�::?+?.':?::i:::�•'::•':.:.?:::;';;r:;;::::;;::::::•:�••'•`•'�:•�1�':: ;:::::�:::�;.:..;•.:'•:•:�••:::��}:::•r;•';•.•.•:•:�:•:•'..'�':•:•::'•:•:::';•�•�;.�:•�.?•:.:.::•.•.•'...:'.•.':•{.'••.•:.••:';.•�•••.•;.:••••':.•:: ... .. .. ...... ..... .... r ,.r r r .r .r .} r y.r r ,f .},.f. t +c � k r � }}. . .}. � +�f kr. k. r .xS } S r ..... ...... .... .. \ .) r.. .# f� } k Y .} £r t£�t y }} � L � 'Sc k i '� �t t Y .r k !$. t �r tx .f .r.r r.r k. k ..}}',. ... ...... ,..... )y k. r..r ..r .}.., .} .. r.r } r ) � � � { \ �f}`t 5 { \ � �.£ `!}}} } �!5 rk x'} } F `i? :t?} CrS .? k. S rk rr r.fr .1 k.•.•... :•.f;:�;::::::ti:`��:::ti�;:`:;:�::ti:�;`.�;:.'.::.:•;:•:;::.::��.'•.`�'�:�::��:•r:..?;.;.;..•:•.:...•......•.••••::•.:��•.•.:'•:•.•.:•'••:.•••.•.•:::••.•.•.••.•.•••::'.•.•,.:•,..•.;•,•.,•.;.•,•,..•.•.•.•;...• .r. . . r......r r ti... x, v ..r k� .. .k k k. ti �... ?r r t,f � ti� � � ', � r � k ,fi k # r, { r .. S r r r r. S r k �tirti� rr'},vv�r..r r r S.r r r. rr•v`x• ,? .. 1....,k••...•,......,::::::::•:••,:•::•.r.;•;r.•;r...;;.,;..r;•..••;.•...•. r, . ... .. ... ... ......v......r ry r r v.k..}v .. �r.. v v.. } v v v.v. v. .. �r }k ry .I J v {r v �� I � v }v vi vJ 1 1 ry J{ vry v/ � }v v } { .k} {�r }I .f./.J v /. }..} 1...r ..}.. . .. . . ... ..} .. .. ,. .k .. ....r f .} .Y r x ,r k S '\ � ,r kr+.f l rr \ .i t }r .} .f� S.v.f �,r �+ .k. k+ �..r ...\..ti..M1 k ti . .. ... ..r .. .. ..... ..... ... rk. .. yk..... k. y.. ....x. ...... .. „r.}.k .}S Sl �} } ,. r y } f.S r k �� k }v r � r } i.. f { } �.} } S f •k• k r �.}�,. xr rf ..f.f..r .�k�.•• .`k•k?,.....•y?:••:•:.... •.�..+..?;,::.:'•:::::;•',•::;?;r.•;? :::ti'.::.:?::;•:.`�:.';�•:;'.:':.?:•.v:?r•:;:::'�:•':::�':':'r�:r•�'•::•r.•�'•::�•:'•:•:::'.:•;•;;•,::.:•::.:.?.;';.:•:�•:�'••::::�:•::.:'••.::'::•'•r•:::::::::;;•.;•.:;•;•,•.::.•:•�:'•••.•:'•'••.:'•'••.•:::'•'••.•.••'••••'•'••:�:••:�.•.':::�••:•••'•••:•':.'••::•:•'•:•':•:•'••:'.�•::.'�•:•'�••'•'�•.� '.�,�,•.. : ;R. :::::..• . .... .. .. k... .. .. .. y.. .) ... ... .. �y.r,. .# .S y.r r y } }/� r h'x / }# � 2 ki k } } t.r r. �'} } k }} ..f k•?ryk .} .Y .•i` }} k'r' ..x'. ..k. }:'.`•: �y } .r. .. r. r......k....k.... ..... .........,... ... \ .... ,. .,...... ,. k....} r y t t ..}. .f .r t 5 }. .} y V# � k5 rk !r✓f r } #•}! f rv� .x.• ..{r}�r.r f kr Y x:.r' y Ji:.r..}. r•}'rr:::...".r.:�� ..}k... k.:•ti?.:::: ...k k........••.. . . . ... . . r... ... .. Y ,... ... ...ti .. ,. ..r.. r,,.r � .# r kf r� } � ,f .r#n�� k S k ,Y � rk }'kw \''t L r } ,vkS .rr� r r v S.r.r ,?, t :rv. rr,?r,.r.••rt,v:.'r::?••,.r r .ki,. .k v.k... k...•r:::.:.:.:::;�:i::�r',:r ��;:;•r�r.`•;?•;'i;;�:::'��'::::;:�r;.;r.r,;.1.•.r.r.•.....•....•..••.:r:••...•......•.:•;•,...:•,:r•:::r:•:.:•:•. . .. .. .. .. ............ .\..... v v.. v v.........v.... .... � ..... .. ........ v vk .... vr} 1 �}}✓.} ry k }v 1. v'./ $....{ v }{�. r{ } .I r ry J r� I k I J f k #vry}v k r r� { vr}r.Ir .f. r..} ti.k:}.vur•. Lk v.k.••v. .xti::::'k.r.rr+ �v ..k....ti....�..k.......1...v ...k........v � r � ti ti c`� r r ,.r .. ... ... . .. . r. .. ... .. .k .. .... ... .........y.,. ......} k .} r\.S t r},f f i f k \ r \ � � k l �! r# +2 r )..r �S.,tit•k,S. i. vr� ..f ,k 1 y} ..k...... .'.k\....,..... . r .r .r rr �.r. .. .. r r 1. r.r r r ti.:..,.r ,..... v.. ,. }.. .. .. .. .. .. ... y.k... y........... ... ....... ..... .. ........ .. ..... ..}r .f ..x k. 3 t � .r.. r} fS} k rk t k t t .x t � rk � � } y .3 3 .} }y .}r .k} �f... ..} k. .}... ••� ..}..• ..k.. :..� .k.............. .. .r .� ,. r ,. � � "�?} r rr r , r r r ... r r r� ... .. �. .... ...r ... .. ... . ... � r r . .r ... .... ,. .. .. .. . . . ....... ... •. ..x r.} �. ,.} .f. .f r .} s�f } .f r , t c t .� . t k r k} k. ..}. ��... :•k.k::.?.::}�:.k. .}........... ...... r ,.. ,. � ,.. r rs . . } r 'i � .. r � . .r .rr ...... .. ... .. .. .. .. .... ... ...... .... ... ... ... .. r. .. ..x. \ ...xr.. .}.t y.r t} 5}f ,\ �£. ,� i k { t r t r.}'} 7k l� ) } ..5 4£.rr ..... .. ........ .. ,.. yry r r ,. r r /"5 � k r ,. kk .}. r}..x ... } y.. +•k •..Y...x.. ...k...},..•... ::•'v,`.;..... ::•k::••::::::::;. .. .. ... ... .r. .. .. .,.. ,. r .. ... ..r r r.r ... .....k... ...r ,.}�. 'Sr. , ..Y i.. ..r.1}r ..r ,fi 1�r, .tY r } r tit,.fix t r r r � +c t r kS S k ,k.rti ,r k r,. k k...• :.k.k...x,...v•tik :•1` ..... ,.. v �{ :. ... .. .. .. .. ...... .. :. ...:. . . .:. ... . . . .:... . . . ...,. ... ..} } \�, k.. }: ..}lk { :{• �S r} ti�v }}}• }�}} : } ti k {r :# ,+'� ) �r ,C S k}ti .)ti {{{ �,.{.,# #.r k ..k.� ..k� .k....v .k.....•...ti.... v.}'�`.:::::••::••ti:::::::+ 1.k...r. .. .. .. ... .. .....r ..ry r ..r.. .. ... .. r ... ..x..v. .$• .$ f rv✓ ri.} ) l ri � x }} r kvr f 1r }v.. f rvrr r v�....r v vvi vvv r v'k�:'••vvv...v k...v �k•::•?":k�:::��1�:v�� l:rv;.?;::r:?ti::ti;+:�:;isti::'?ti:i':::::::�v+:;;:;:�:'��'::?:�M1:'��.'r:•�'.�'�.'�:'��:M14'�.':.'�'•:':•'�'.':•'•'•:'::'•'�':'•:':':�:'::':•'�:::•':.:j':.:.'.'.:,•:;i�;.:�;.•;•;•;�;•:':;�':;:,':,'•:�.'•;:::.•.•.;•.;•,.;,•,.•.:•;.?'..:;•'..:•:'.;•,':.':•:••'•;?:';;�:'.';.::•:.•::••:••';i::'•:•;.:.::.• ::••;:.::�:':•:::..':••;::..::..:.•'.:.•'.;.:.:.;.:'.'.'.:.:•:'•::.•;.:.:;•;:.;:•':'•:•::;.:•:::.:.:•:.':'.'.':.•:•:.;:•:::.;:•;.:•::•:••:•':.':.:•:.:.'•:::.•';•'•':••'•::•:••'. .............v....v v...r�n vv v..vv..+..v•v r..ry v v v ti.....r.v..r v.r r v• v� r v v ...... .. ... .. ... .. .... .. .. .. .. .. ...... ... .. .. .. k..�.. ..t.r r .k r �.} r.f r ,rr r r{ '{k r '.k{�t'y r�'.�,.f r }r} � t.i y #•� k} r }' .3 .}�i•. r..x'•..M1..5. k••::•ti:1 M11:•v •'��,`.k........:••k......•....... ..•�.......••..•,.......•.k .k.. f..... .. ....... ,...y ... .. ��..r .. ............r ... .r.. r ,r.. r,.•. \\ }... .. .. ... ....... ... .. .. .. ... ....r .. .. .. ... ... k. r\.. .�k........x.•y. r.5 �x} ,.} r.Y .kr J.r rt •t 5 � Y } Cr} .}x'•y,. x .{.•ry r. Y .`k r}.:•.f. � .}... \k.. k....v.:::':�:�:•::::•k:::••`•:`.:••• ..k.•. ....... .. ..... .,.. ... .. .... ... ... .... ....... ..... r... .. rr.k ..}r.r+.,..}•;. r•t .}:.r `�.� f.k}}` t r }. .r.,k �} t+.) }..y5 .}.. ..f•+i` •..k.x........... ••,\...•y ..k.......•.......k .... ... .. .. . .. ..... .. r . . ... .. .... r . .. ... .r. r••.. ... •:..k..v• ,k k...•• :`k •`ti••ti r xk} ?,. }.}`� w t .r�r t r r t .S r,.k.}.. �k.. ..... ... ..... ... .. ..... .. r ... ....... .... .. .. ..r .I.v r.1: vvr +C r.Jr rir:r ik vk;?{v }:f r rk r}. }v. v;} .} }vv•titi•v:vv;'::::i::lv•v...•v::��:�i�:•...................v ••rr:"iti::....::��:''::"::::::;:;...r•,r;�: :ti:?.:'�::r:':isr:i`:ti;;ti..;:.•;:;..';::;.;;.:.;:.r:.;.:.;.:.:::::�':�':::�':'•:•�:::.:::'•':'•'.::•;:::::;':;'::.'.':::"':::�;.:::•:':::::'.':;::.'.:'::.':•':�.'.'::'::•'•'•::.'::'•:'::':•''::'•'•'�:::.'::'.'.'.':;:•:•;':�::'.'.:•,:::;.';,•'•.'•:'.'.':•'•'';';';'.':•:�,::;::•.'•'•''•':•"•'•'•'•'•'•'•'�':•'•'�.'.'.'�•'::::�.':•,•:•:•:':�;'.'.'.':;.:';';:::•:••:;.;:.,.,•,::•••..•.::•..•:•:;.:•:•:::•'.'•::•,•;.'.�'•:•'.':.'•:;'.':.'.'.';•:•:':::•;':•:':'::•;•;•.'.'.::�••::•:;:.'.'.••,••:•:;'•:. v.v... v...�.......v:::.........v...v v...':v•.vl. v....v.•...•.•• ... v. k k..+1..v,vv•}.r i.k k k++r'}Yv ..}. )vv vvvi J { ti:} } }.vrr ..k.} k... l .. .. .. ..... .. .... r .. ....r ... ... •v.........•.•...•.• .•...•r••. .. .v... .v•r:v.;.;.. ..}v v :'•{v v.} }..}v..x / r+\.r {v v. k r..} :}v�i ../.ki . ... ... ... .... .......r ... ..... .. ... .. . . r..,... ... ... .f:::r::::��::r• •k v �.}f .k'4`k•rr r fvt`•} ) �.rvti5 �/ r'k�••� .k:?:i:::•••'..}.... . ... .. .. ....... .. ... ... ........ .. ..... ......... ... ... .. ... . ... . . . .:}•• k::... ..}. .7 .}y.• �k: .k.}. :;f�;i;::;::::'•ti:?:r::::::::.,•'::r:•`.�:r•'•:';':•':::::: 'r'::••`•:%'�:; :r%:;�:�.::::•'.;?'.'.;•:r.:r:•`:r.:::;•:•;:�.:;:;::::�:::;�::::::•�•.:�•:••.?::::•;�:;•.;•,;.•;.•;.•:..:••.•::•.:•::.'•::•:�•:�:.::�•:�:'�:.::.::::•r�?:.:;;•;::.:•�::.•.•.•.•:'::•'.:•••:;:;::.•:•.•:::••;:•••.:.::::::::•.•:;;•.;•••••••••::••••••••::•••••;.•::••..•;::::.;.....•.•:;•.•.;•;.•...:••:'•:�'•'•'•:•:��:::•:.•:••;.•:;•.•.�;.:::•.•::•.•:•:•;.•;•;:•••••:•.:••;:.•.•:••.•••::;...:;••.•••.•.;•..•.•....:•••••.••••••••.••.••..••.•.•.'•'.'•:••••••.•:•••'.:'.•••.'.•.••• ... .. .. ...... .. .. .... .. .. ........... ..... ........... .. ... .... .r ...\v r•�...v• ..}vv ti:.r }ti ti...r v:ti::'•v.• k k..xv v.v...v.:}:ti::ti:::yr?ti:�:�::vv........:•v.....ti vv.`v......•;•.' ...r;.••.v•..;,•.v. .. .. .. .... .. ...... ... .. ... ... ..r..r,.,.,...l..•.•...... .•r. .., ., ..kv.v';r:i::•r ti:}1'?::i v'v.} r l 1::?.:r:r::................r...r,.. .,�.,...,. r..r;r;v..;;•,r v..v..•..•.. ... .rv. ...... r...;..v.•.:.•;;.;..•.;. ..r. v... •/:•::.. .....•r•.::•f.....,• ........ v. v ...v... v.:..;.}...:... ../•.•.•....r v;...v v.x••.x' .. .. ...... .. ... .. ... .. ... .. .... .. .. ......r.... . .. r.. .. .... .. ...v. ..r. .v ..... r v•r.•• ......,r..�;•v.....v;..v..?.::::.....;........ v.:..... v... ... :::}.....v....�.... ..�v k::..;...i:::"::::::::::v.yv..;;.. . ..r .. ...........r....•.......•...•..r.••...••.....•...•.r.r.••.•.•..•.•.... ...•v.....:.......v.• r.• v v�.1...... ... r. .v.... .. .v. ..... r...... v ..•• ...:.r:...:r::v..........ti ..r....:•:::v •.k..•v.....'•:: .. ... .. ....... ... ..... .... .r ... .. ... ... ... .... .'............•:.•:•::'.••'..• r.'/.v:••r'.v........,..... v•�.::::::•:•k.:::•:v•::•.•...•......�•..... \..;.ti..::::..;...::v:••:•v•:..:.;.r.;.,.•... .. .. ... .. ... .. .. .. ... .. .... ..... .. .......... .. .'�:i . ....... ... .....r.•..,. .... .. ...r .r•r..;..•..;.., k....v.......,,ti . .. .. ... •' •'.• ,. •. • •.1 • .•' .\ • •• .' • •.•...••.•.'••:.•.•••'.•�M1� • •• .• // .'•.'�} • ..•.. •. .• .:.. ' '• M1 •. . ' • •• • . . . .. . . ••• ' . .' ' .' '• . . ' • ••� • •' . ... . .• • �• .. . .... ••� . . • . .• • ' ' . . ' • . • . •. .�• � �• � . .• • • •• : . • . •• . :•. . ' : ..::.::��L ' ,. •. •• • ,. •. • .. .• . .• .' . .. . .. . . • •• . : ' .• .• ' . .• '' ' . . . . .. .. .' . . •• '' • •. • •. �}} •• •• • • .•.:�t •. .• .•:•: ,' ,' .• :. • .• •• .•• • .•'•. •'.' k ',•' ••.. .• ' •' .•• .•• •• •. .• .' .•.'�r • •. .... : .' .• ••' •• . . . . •. •• •.. .•• •• .•• •• ..•• •.• •.' •• .• '•' .' •.•.• .'••. •..'...••••' .• •' '•... •. .••. .• ''' •• •• •••' •• •' .. •. •• •••' ..:x• .. .. . . .. {•. ..• . . .. .. y' •'••'•} • .• .• .. .:} •' •Y . •� •..' •' •} .•' .. .. ' . :{ .'} ' ''{ .. ••K •"} • .• .• .. ' •1•' •• . .• v. .'.\ . .. .... ... . ' . . .. ......• ... .• .• .• . . ... :. . .•r..::.• .••... • :. • ..:.• : •:• .. •.••�•: •:.•�•�..: :•.. •�•• ••�.•�.�. •: ��.�•�::.•.••:vv.�:�::.•..::�••.r�::�. .•.• .•�.�e . .... . ... :•.• . ..• .a r�:n �•� • ....•a •n .••••• o n•� n . • •o n a n � s . • . . . • •. ....••..k� . .. . . . . .•';}k ,. ' '•••� ... •• •• . .••..: ...:� . . . . ..� . . . . . .. . ..� .. } .k • •.• ,.. • .• .• •' k • •.• .. . ••. .. \ ' } .• .� k .# • .t ."3 • .. k .'••� .• •. •' •� •• •• .• .. y '.S • ''• .\ ... •. � •• •.• k{ •' .• •.. .• .� .•' .'•• . .•••'{+ • .� .•'# .• •. .••• •• .• •. .. . .• .. • • • .. \ • .• '.vt • .. •'� ,' .� ' .. •'1 • \ ti .. .. ..� • \ • .' •. •. • .• .. { } ti •' •.•'� •� .. ':} ••• •, .. • •;� • •. ••• . .• •• .•• .' • •• ..' ' •' .. .• ' • ••• • .. ti .. .. •'•• ... ''• k .. "�)}. .•• '.{ •'• � .. .. . .. .• .•• .. .. . '� .. ..� .. ..•�k .'{{: .. •' :� • .. .} ' .k • 'k: • .' •� • ,..� .'wiI'` • of • •• .. ,• • .' •. . • •. •} .. v�i • : ; • •..•�{ • '•�T{' • ..�3 •... •...••... •'•'...•'•.••' ... ,' •' .' .i�. ,..... ��x .. .'� k • ••,:}� • •• •. •• " • .•..� � .. { :•� .. •• '. + • •'' �. ' '. •• .. .• • .. .. ,:1 • .• ••'.< .. '.: ' •• ;�C ': • .. ,•.. . � .....• .. .. ..} .• .' ••••'• .. .' •'' •' ' CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC FORUM SIGN - IN SHEET Date : August 18 , 2020 Prior to the commencement of the meeting a person wishing to address the Mayor and City Council MUST sign in and limit their comments to the matter described below. Complaints about individuals, city staff, business or private matters will not be allowed. Testimony or comment on an active application or proposal that is or will be pending before Planning and Zoning or City Council is strictly prohibited by Idaho law. Each speaker will have up to three (3) minutes to address the Mayor and Council, but the chair may stop the speaker if the matter does appear to violate guidelines, varies from the topic identified on this sign in sheet or other provisions of law or policy. Print Name Provide Description of Discussion Topic 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for City of Meridian Fiscal Year 2020 Amended Budget Page 4 PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE : August 18 , 2020 ITEM # ON AGENDA : 1 PROJECT NAME : Fiscal Year 2020 Amended Budget PRINTED FULL NAME For Against Neutral Want to Testify YES OR NO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Item#1. C� fIEN , IN4, IDAHG-. MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Jenny Fields Meeting Date: August 18, 2020 Presenter: Jenny Fields Estimated Time: 10 mins Topic: Public Hearing for City of Meridian Fiscal Year 2020 Amended Budget Recommended Council Action: Approve FY2020 Amended Budget Background: Council tentatively approved FY2020 Amended Budget for Citizens to review and comment on July 21, 2020. This is a formal public hearing for Citizen to provide input. Upon closure of this public hearing, Council will establish the budget amount for FY2020 Budget Amendment Ordinance. Page 5 Item#1. Special Notice of Public Hearing Amended Budget for Fiscal Year 2020 City of Meridian, Idaho NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing for consideration of an amendment to the 2020 fiscal year budget by appropriating additional monies received by the City of Meridian, said hearing to be held at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian Idaho, at 6:00 p.m.on Tuesday,August 18,2020. Capital Improvement Fund - 55 FY2020 FY2020 FY2020 Original Budget Amendments Final Budget Revenues Total Revenue $ 2,000 $ (2,000) $ (0) Expenditures Operating Administration $ - $ - Fire $ - $ - Police $ - $ - Parks $ - $Total Operating $ - $ - $ - Capital Administration $ - $ - $ - Fire $ - $ - Police $ 4,328,680 $ (133,680) $ 4,195,000 Parks $ - $ 0 $ 0 Total Capital $ 4,328,680 $ (133,680) $ 4,195,000 Carryforward - Operating Administration $ - Fire $ - Police $ - Parks $ - Carryforward - Operating $ - $ - $ - Carryforward - Capital Administration $ - $ - $ - Fire $ - Police $ - Parks $ 1,237,795 $ (1,187,119) $ 50,676 Carryforward - Capital $ 1,237,795 $ (1,187,119) $ 50,676 Total Carryforward $ 1,237,795 $ (1,187,119) $ 50,676 Total Expenditures $ 5,566,475 $ (1,320,799) $ 4,245,676 Transfers $ (166,788) $ - $ (166,788) Page 6 Item#1. Total Expenditures with Transfers $ 5,399,687 $ (1,320,799) $ 4,078,888 (Use)/Addition of Fund Balance $ (5,397,687) $ 1,318,799 $ (4,078,888) Enterprise Fund - 60 - 65 FY2020 FY2020 FY2020 Original Budget Amendments Final Budget Revenues Water/Sewer Sales $ 26,325,769 $ 26,325,769 Other Sources $ 18,201,845 $ 1,000,321 $ 19,202,166 Total Revenue $ 44,527,614 $ 1,000,321 $ 45,527,935 Expenditures Personnel Utility Billing $ 549,073 $ 23,533 $ 572,606 Public Works $ 4,213,178 $ 155,233 $ 4,368,411 Water $ 2,263,808 $ 143,302 $ 2,407,110 Wastewater $ 3,347,500 $ 124,653 $ 3,472,153 Total Personnel $ 10,373,559 $ 446,721 $ 10,820,280 Operating Utility Billing $ 633,805 $ - $ 633,805 Public Works $ 948,266 $ (7,300) $ 940,966 Water $ 3,152,866 $ 348,894 $ 3,501,760 Wastewater $ 3,557,601 $ 1,041,889 $ 4,599,490 Total Operating $ 8,292,538 $ 1,383,483 $ 9,676,021 Total Personnel and Operating $ 18,666,097 $ 1,830,204 $ 20,496,301 Capital Utility Billing $ - $ - $ - Public Works $ - $ - $ - Water $ 4,140,856 $ (5,540) $ 4,135,316 Wastewater $ 4,616,600 $ 3,545,614 $ 8,162,214 Total Capital $ 8,757,456 $ 3,540,074 $ 12,297,530 Carryforward - Operating Utility Billing $ - $ - Public Works $ 256,066 $ (162,412) $ 93,654 Water $ 157,439 $ (35,888) $ 121,551 Wastewater $ 115,000 $ (15,000) $ 100,000 Total Carryforward - Operating $ 528,505 $ (213,299) $ 315,206 Carryforward - Capital Utility Billing $ - $ - $ - Public Works $ - $ - $ - Water $ 3,632,414 $ (1,600,405) $ 2,032,009 Wastewater $ 13,585,428 $ (5,492,843) $ 8,092,585 Total Carryforward - Capital $ 17,217,842 $ (7,093,249) $ 10,124,594 Total Carryforward $ 17,746,347 $ (7,306,548) $ 10,439,799 Page 7 Item#1. Total Expenditures $ 45,169,900 $ (1,936,270) $ 43,233,630 Transfers $ 2,955,145 $ - $ 2,955,145 Total Expenditures with Transfers $ 48,125,045 $ (1,936,270) $ 46,188,775 (Use)/Addition of Fund Balance $ (3,597,431) $ 2,936,591 $ (660,840) Governmental Funds (01 ,07,08,20,50) (01,07,08,20,50) (01,07,08,20,50) (01,07,08,20,50) FY2020 FY2020 FY2020 Original Budget Amendments Final Budget Revenues Property Taxes $ 36,557,451 $ - $ 36,557,451 Other Revenue $ 26,012,545 $ 4,398,167 $ 30,410,711 Total Revenue $ 62,569,996 $ 4,398,167 $ 66,968,162 Expenditures Personnel Administration $ 5,912,775 $ 161,518 $ 6,074,293 Fire $ 11,736,347 $ 32,539 $ 11,768,886 Police $ 18,530,489 $ 584,342 $ 19,114,831 Parks $ 3,548,904 $ 127,269 $ 3,676,173 Community Development $ 3,727,086 $ 216,238 $ 3,943,324 Total Personnel $ 43,455,601 $ 1,121,906 $ 44,577,507 Operating Administration $ 3,599,601 $ 4,071,329 $ 7,670,930 Fire $ 1,513,153 $ 66,364 $ 1,579,517 Police $ 4,210,101 $ 30,233 $ 4,240,334 Parks $ 2,286,610 $ 119,913 $ 2,406,523 Community Development $ 2,186,038 $ 953,531 $ 3,139,569 Total Operating $ 13,795,503 $ 5,241,370 $ 19,036,873 Total Personnel and Operating $ 57,251,104 $ 6,363,277 $ 63,614,381 Capital Administration $ 424,000 $ (524) $ 423,476 Fire $ 50,300 $ (1,350) $ 48,950 Police $ 3,501,830 $ 169,660 $ 3,671,490 Parks $ 1,190,122 $ 677,166 $ 1,867,288 Community Development $ 15,300 $ - $ 15,300 Total Capital $ 5,181,552 $ 844,952 $ 6,026,504 Carryforward - Personnel Administration $ - $ - $ - Fire $ - $ - $ - Police $ - $ - $ - Parks $ - $ - $ - Community Development $ - $ - $ - Total Carryforward - Personnel $ - $ - $ - Page 8 Item#1. Carryforward - Operating Administration $ 137,044 $ (66,559) $ 70,485 Fire $ 72,825 $ - $ 72,825 Police $ - $ - $ - Parks $ 62,645 $ (41,705) $ 20,940 Community Development $ 84,945 $ 10,484 $ 95,429 Total Carryforward - Operating $ 357,459 $ (97,779) $ 259,680 Carryforward - Capital Administration $ 323,520 $ (78,043) $ 245,477 Fire $ 4,962,581 $ (2,086,314) $ 2,876,267 Police $ 58,778 $ (9,794) $ 48,984 Parks $ 1,528,093 $ (556,764) $ 971,329 Community Development $ 125,934 $ (25,358) $ 100,576 Total Carryforward - Capital $ 6,998,906 $ (2,756,273) $ 4,242,633 Carryforward Administration $ 460,564 $ (144,602) $ 315,962 Fire $ 5,035,406 $ (2,086,314) $ 2,949,092 Police $ 58,778 $ (9,794) $ 48,984 Parks $ 1,590,738 $ (598,469) $ 992,269 Community Development $ 210,879 $ (14,873) $ 196,006 Total Carryforward $ 7,356,365 $ (2,854,052) $ 4,502,313 Total Expenditures $ 69,789,021 $ 4,354,177 $ 74,143,198 Transfers $ (2,788,357) $ - $ (2,788,357) Total Expenditures with Transfers $ 67,000,664 $ 4,354,177 $ 71,354,841 (Use)/Addition of Fund Balance $ (4,430,668) $ 43,990 $ (4,386,679) Total Budget - All Funds FY2020 FY2020 FY2020 Original Budget Amendments Final Budget Revenues Total Revenue $ 107,099,610 $ 5,396,488 $ 112,496,097 Expenditures Total Personnel and Operating $ 75,917,201 $ 8,193,481 $ 84,110,682 Total Capital $ 18,267,688 $ 4,251,346 $ 22,519,034 Total Carryforward $ 26,340,507 $ (11,347,719) $ 14,992,788 Total Expenditures $ 120,525,396 $ 1,097,108 $ 121,622,504 Transfers $ - $ - $ - Total Expenditures with Transfers $ 120,525,396 $ 1,097,108 $ 121,622,504 Page 9 Item#1. (Use)/Addition of Fund Balance $ (13,425,786) $ 4,299,380 $ (9,126,407) Citizens are invited to inspect the detailed supporting records of the above financial statements. For further information contact City of Meridian Finance Department at (208) 888-4433. Page 10 FY2020 Amended Budget www.meridiancity.org August 18, 2020August 18, 2020 Public HearingFY2020 Amended Budget Public Hearing Agenda www.meridiancity.org BudgetAmended FY2020 Approve Questions / DiscussionsEnterprise Fund Capital Improvement FundGeneral Fund $121,622,504-FY2020 Amended Budget www.meridiancity.org FY2020 Amended Total City Budget www.meridiancity.org 4.02%\]\[down ($1,936,270) –Enterprise Fund \[down 24.46%\]($1,320,799) –Capital Improvement Fund 6.5%\]\[up $4,354,177 –General Fund %\]1\[up .9($1,097,108) Amendments 36 –Total City FY2020 Amended Total City Budget www.meridiancity.org FY2020 Amended General Fund Budget www.meridiancity.org Carryforward Adjustment–($2,854,052) Streetlights for Chinden Projects–$619,560 Contracted Building Services–$835,329 Employee Benefits Plan Trust–$1,021,999 24 Total Amendments Approved–Amended Items \[up 6.5%\]$4,354,177 –General Fund FY2020 Amended General Fund Budget www.meridiancity.org Carryforward Adjustment–($1,320,799) Total Amendments Approved0 –Amended Items 24.46%\]\[down ($1,320,799) –Capital Improvement Fund FY2020 Amended CIP Fund Budget www.meridiancity.org FY2020 Amended Enterprise Fund Budget www.meridiancity.org Carryforward Adjustment–($7,306,548) MXUsGrowth Meters, –$335,559 Main Extension ProjectsWater –$336,682 WRRF Land Acquisition–$3,051,214 12 Total Amendments Approved–Amended Items \[down 4.02%\]($1,936,270) –Enterprise Fund FY2020 Amended Enterprise Fund Budget www.meridiancity.org Questions www.meridiancity.org weeks to make the budget official.Legal will present an Ordinance for approval in the next few Next Steps:$121,622,504Budget Amendment OrdinanceCouncil to establish the budget amount for FY2020 FY2020 Budget Council Approval FY2021 Proposed Budget www.meridiancity.org August 18, 2020August 18, 2020 Public HearingFY2021 Proposed Budget Public Hearing Agenda www.meridiancity.org BudgetProposed FY2021 Approve Questions / DiscussionsFundEnterprise General Fund $129,364,101-FY2021 Proposed Budget FY2021 Budget Process Overview www.meridiancity.orgOctoberOctoberSeptemberSeptemberAugustAugustJulyJulyJuneJuneMay-Feb May-Feb FY2021 Budget Process Overview www.meridiancity.org$129,364,101 FY2021 Proposed Total City Budget www.meridiancity.org FY2021 Proposed Budget $71,408,656 General Fund www.meridiancity.org Source $65,146,371by Revenue General Fund Projected -FY2021 City of Meridian FY2021 General Fund Revenue www.meridiancity.org FY2021 Proposed Budget $57,955,445 www.meridiancity.org$44,584,946Source by Revenue Enterprise Fund Projected -City of Meridian FY2021 FY2020 Enterprise Fund Revenue www.meridiancity.org Questions www.meridiancity.org make the budget official.Legal will present an Ordinance for approval in the next few weeks to Next Steps:$1,091,204years.order to utilize that amount in subsequent Budget in FY2021 elects to reserve all foregone revenue associated to the Council $129,364,101OrdinanceCouncil to establish the budget amount for FY2021 Budget FY2021 Budget Council Approval www.meridiancity.org Mayor, City Council Members, Department Directors and Staff Thank you! 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing to Reserve All Foregone Revenue Associated to Fiscal Year 2021 Budget Page 11 PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE : August 18 , 2020 ITEM # ON AGENDA : 2 PROJECT NAME : All Foregone Revenue Associated with Fiscal Year 2021 Budget PRINTED FULL NAME For Against Neutral Want to Testify YES OR NO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Item#2. C� fIEN , IN4, IDAHG-. MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Jenny Fields Meeting Date: August 18, 2020 Presenter: Brad Purser Estimated Time: 3 mins Topic: Public Hearing to Reserve All Foregone Revenue Associated to FY2021 Budget Recommended Council Action: Approve to Reserve all Foregone Revenue Associated to FY2021 Budget Background: This is a formal public hearing for Citizens to provide input. Upon closure of this public hearing, Council will elect to reserve all foregone revenue associated to the FY2021 budget in order to utilize that amount in subsequent years. Page 12 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for City of Meridian Fiscal Year 2021 Proposed Budget Page 13 PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE : August 18 , 2020 ITEM # ON AGENDA : 3 PROJECT NAME : Fiscal Year 2021 Proposed Budget PRINTED FULL NAME For Against Neutral Want to Testify YES OR NO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE : August 18 , 2020 ITEM # ON AGENDA : 3 PROJECT NAME : Fiscal Year 2021 Proposed Budget PRINTED FULL NAME For Against Neutral Want to Testify YES OR NO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Item#3. C� fIEN , IN4, IDAHG-. MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Jenny Fields Meeting Date: August 18, 2020 Presenter: Brad Purser Estimated Time: 20 mins Topic: Public Hearing for City of Meridian Fiscal Year 2021 Proposed Budget Recommended Council Action: Approve FY2021 Budget Background: Council tentatively approved FY2021 Budget for Citizens to review and comment on July 21, 2020. This is a formal public hearing for Citizen to provide input. Upon closure of this public hearing, Council will establish the budget amount for FY2021 Budget ordinance. Page 14 Item#3. Special Notice of Public Hearing Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2021 City of Meridian, Idaho A public hearing, pursuant to Idaho Code 50-1002,will be held for consideration of the proposed budget for the fiscal year from October 1, 2020 to September 30, 2021.The hearing will be held at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho at 6:00 p.m.on Tuesday,August 18,2020.All interested persons are invited to appear and show cause, if any, why such budget should or should not be adopted. Copies of the proposed City budget in detail are available at the City Hall during regular office hours (8:00 AM to 5:00 PM, weekdays).City Hall is accessible to persons with disabilities.Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to the budget documents or to the hearing, please contact the City Clerk Office, 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public hearing.The proposed FY2021 budget is shown below as FY2021 proposed expenditures and revenues. Capital Improvement Fund - 55 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 Actual Original Budget Original Budget Revenues Total Revenue $ 285,791 $ 2,000 Expenditures Operating Administration $ 5,618 Fire $ - Police $ - Parks $ 2,951,262 Total Operating $ 2,956,880 $ - $ - Capital Administration $ - $ - $ - Fire $ - Police $ - $ 4,328,680 Parks $ - $ - $ - Total Capital $ - $ 4,328,680 $ - Carryforward - Operating Administration Fire Police Parks Carryforward - Operating $ - $ - $ - Carryforward - Capital Administration $ - $ - $ - Fire Police $ 4,195,000 Parks $ - $ 1,237,795 $ 24,077 Carryforward - Capital $ - $ 1,237,795 $ 4,219,077 Total Carryforward $ - $ 1,237,795 $ 4,219,077 Page 15 Item#3. Total Expenditures $ 2,956,880 $ 5,566,475 $ 4,219,077 Transfers $ (3,530,943) $ (166,788) $ (182,787) Total Expenditures with Transfers $ (574,063) $ 5,399,687 $ 4,036,290 (Use)/Addition of Fund Balance $ 859,855 $ (5,397,687) $ (4,036,290) Enterprise Fund - 60 - 65 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 Actual Original Budget Original Budget Revenues Water/Sewer Sales $ 24,805,102 $ 26,325,769 $ 27,310,353 Other Sources $ 24,748,764 $ 18,201,845 $ 17,274,593 Total Revenue $ 49,553,866 $ 44,527,614 $ 44,584,946 Expenditures Personnel Utility Billing $ 495,821 $ 549,073 $ 561,332 Public Works $ 3,599,810 $ 4,213,178 $ 4,324,845.09 Water $ 1,960,267 $ 2,263,808 $ 2,370,010 Wastewater $ 2,777,268 $ 3,347,500 $ 3,630,483 Total Personnel $ 8,833,167 $ 10,373,559 $ 10,886,670 Operating Utility Billing $ 626,241 $ 633,805 $ 717,529 Public Works $ 780,178 $ 948,266 $ 682,973 Water $ 3,227,249 $ 3,152,866 $ 3,453,545 Wastewater $ 2,807,361 $ 3,557,601 $ 3,679,878 Total Operating $ 7,441,029 $ 8,292,538 $ 8,533,925 Total Personnel and Operating $ 16,274,196 $ 18,666,097 $ 19,420,595 Capital Utility Billing $ 7,178 $ - $ - Public Works $ 26,004 $ - $ 17,619 Water $ 4,212,020 $ 4,140,856 $ 5,245,000 Wastewater $ 17,173,212 $ 4,616,600 $ 17,833,000 Total Capital $ 21,418,415 $ 8,757,456 $ 23,095,619 Carryforward - Operating 3300 Utility Billing $ - $ - 3200 Public Works $ 256,066 $ 279,783 3400 Water $ 157,439 $ 392,702 3500 Wastewater $ 115,000 $ 249,832 Total Carryforward - Operating $ - $ 528,505 $ 922,317 Carryforward - Capital Utility Billing $ - $ - Public Works $ - $ - Page 16 Item#3. Water $ 3,632,414 $ 3,832,025 Wastewater $ 13,585,428 $ 7,770,655 Total Carryforward - Capital $ - $ 17,217,842 $ 11,602,679 Total Carryforward $ - $ 17,746,347 $ 12,524,996 Total Expenditures $ 37,692,611 $ 45,169,900 $ 55,041,210 Transfers $ 2,629,207 $ 2,955,145 $ 2,914,235 Total Expenditures with Transfers $ 40,321,818 $ 48,125,045 $ 57,955,445 (Use)/Addition of Fund Balance $ 9,232,048 $ (3,597,431) $ (13,370,499) Governmental Funds (01 ,07,08,20,50) (01,07,08,20,50) (01,07,08,20,50) (01,07,08,20,50) FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 Actual Original Budget Original Budget Revenues Property Taxes $ 34,287,294 $ 36,557,451 $ 39,282,350 Other Revenue $ 34,073,752 $ 26,012,545 $ 25,864,021 Total Revenue $ 68,361,046 $ 62,569,996 $ 65,146,371 Expenditures Personnel Administration $ 5,307,391 $ 5,912,775 $ 6,039,699 Fire $ 10,445,379 $ 11,736,347 $ 12,235,774 Police $ 15,871,330 $ 18,530,489 $ 20,045,426 Parks $ 2,880,306 $ 3,548,904 $ 3,649,530 Community Development $ 2,584,395 $ 3,727,086 $ 3,951,322 Total Personnel $ 37,088,801 $ 43,455,601 $ 45,921,751 Operating Administration $ 3,340,005 $ 3,599,601 $ 3,155,674 Fire $ 1,418,756 $ 1,513,153 $ 1,996,993 Police $ 2,590,455 $ 4,210,101 $ 3,252,494 Parks $ 2,266,547 $ 2,286,610 $ 2,374,316 Community Development $ 3,404,433 $ 2,186,038 $ 2,216,448 Total Operating $ 13,020,196 $ 13,795,503 $ 12,995,925 Total Personnel and Operating $ 50,108,997 $ 57,251,104 $ 58,917,675 Capital Administration $ 277,072 $ 424,000 $ 210,000 Fire $ 3,348,343 $ 50,300 $ 3,015,000 Police $ 326,273 $ 3,501,830 $ 738,154 Parks $ 2,305,642 $ 1,190,122 $ 1,977,900 Community Development $ 368,727 $ 15,300 $ - Total Capital $ 6,626,057 $ 5,181,552 $ 5,941,054 Carryforward - Personnel Administration $ - $ - $ - Page 17 Item#3. Fire $ - $ - $ - Police $ - $ - $ - Parks $ - $ - $ - Community Development $ - $ - $ - Total Carryforward - Personnel $ - $ - $ - Carryforward - Operating Administration $ - $ 137,044 $ 908,401 Fire $ - $ 72,825 $ 16,000 Police $ - $ - $ 20,840 Parks $ - $ 62,645 $ - Community Development $ - $ 84,945 $ 49,900 Total Carryforward -Operating $ - $ 357,459 $ 995,141 Carryforward - Capital Administration $ - $ 323,520 $ 461,590 Fire $ - $ 4,962,581 $ - Police $ - $ 58,778 $ 2,589,096 Parks $ - $ 1,528,093 $ 1,141,150 Community Development $ - $ 125,934 $ 58,107 Total Carryforward -Capital $ - $ 6,998,906 $ 4,249,944 Carryforward Administration $ - $ 460,564 $ 1,369,991 Fire $ - $ 5,035,406 $ 16,000 Police $ - $ 58,778 $ 2,609,936 Parks $ - $ 1,590,738 $ 1,141,150 Community Development $ - $ 210,879 $ 108,007 Total Carryforward $ - $ 7,356,365 $ 5,245,085 Total Expenditures $ 56,735,054 $ 69,789,021 $ 70,103,814 Transfers $ 901,736 $ (2,788,357) $ (2,731,448) Total Expenditures with Transfers $ 57,636,790 $ 67,000,664 $ 67,372,366 (Use)/Addition of Fund Balance $ 10,724,256 $ (4,430,668) $ (2,225,995) Total Budget - All Funds FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 Actual Original Budget Original Budget Revenues Total Revenue $ 118,200,704 $ 107,099,610 $ 109,731,317 Expenditures Total Personnel and Operating $ 69,340,073 $ 75,917,201 $ 78,338,270 Total Capital $ 28,044,471 $ 18,267,688 $ 29,036,673 Total Carryforward $ - $ 26,340,507 $ 21,989,158 Page 18 Item#3. Total Expenditures $ 97,384,545 $ 120,525,396 $ 129,364,101 Transfers $ - $ - $ - Total Expenditures with Transfers $ 97,384,545 $ 120,525,396 $ 129,364,101 (Use)/Addition of Fund Balance $ 20,816,159 $ (13,425,786) $ (19,632,784) Citizens are invited to inspect the detailed supporting records of the above financial statements. For further information contact City of Meridian Finance Department at (208) 888-4433. Page 19 Item#3. Charlene Way From: Bonnie Welte <bonniewelte@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 8:39 AM To: City Clerk Subject: 2021 Budget Thank you for increasing the budget for Meridian Police and Fire. We love our "safe community" and it's a worthwhile investment in our future. Bonnie Welte 3722 N. Pankratz Way Meridian 83646 land line 208 -297-6267 1 Page 20 Item#3. Adrienne Weatherly From: Erik bruce <C D Bruce@msn.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 2:45 PM To: City Clerk Subject: FY21 Budget Comment NOTE: Comments provided will be provided to the Meridian City Council and become part of the public record. T Please don't waste taxpayers' money on beautifying with flowers, irrigation, fancy signage, and maintenance staff, etc. on roundabout located on Pine Street, Meridian. This is an unusable space. Dollars from hard working citizens can be better put to use elsewhere, where the public may actually benefit. 1 Page 21 Item#3. Adrienne Weatherly From: M Tewell <blaine777@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 8:06 PM To: City Clerk Subject: FY21 Budget Comment NOTE: Comments provided will be provided to the Meridian City Council and become part of the public record. I did a cursory glance at the 2021 Budget. What does the term 'transfers' mean? It appears we are over$13,000,000 in the hole already for the year 2021? How can that be? Blaine Tewell Meridian, ID 83646 1 Page 22 Item#3. Adrienne Weatherly From: Todd Lavoie Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2020 4:34 PM To: Chris Johnson Cc: Adrienne Weatherly; Charlene Way; Emily Kane; Jenny Fields; Brad Purser; Robert Simison; Shandy Lam Subject: RE: FY21 Budget Comment Hello Chris, We have the following reply for Blaine Tewell. If you could provide this information for the record, that would be great. Thank you. Hello Blaine Tewell, Thank you for reaching out to the City about the FY21 Budget. We will answer your questions to the best of our ability. What does the term 'transfers' mean? The City uses the term 'transfers' to represent the costs provided by the internal service departments (i.e. Finance, Human Resources, Information Technology, Legal, and City Hall)to the departments that utilize their services instead of outsourcing the necessary services. It appears we are over$13,000,000 in the hole already for the year 2021? How can that be? The City is proposing to the citizens to utilize $19,623,783 from savings (known as Fund Balance)to balance the FY21 budget.This need is created by the necessity to continue all active projects that were approved during the FY2020 Budget process (known as Carryforward)that will be completed in 2021. Similarly, all budgetary amounts associated with projects this current fiscal year that are not spent will be available next fiscal year via the fund balance. If the total Carryfoward is removed from the equation, the FY21 budget is in balance with no shortfall. A B C i BC City of Meridian FY2021 Original Budget '6 Revenues 7 Total Revenue IS 109,731,317 8 I 9 Expenditures I. 0 Total Personnel and Operating $ 78,338,270 1 2 Total Capital $ 29,036,673 3 4 TotalCarryfolward S 21.989,158 5 _ 6 Total Expenditures S 129,364.100 7 '8 Transfers S 9 0 Total Expenditures with Transfers $ 129.364,100 1 ;2(Use)/Addition of Fund Balance S (19,632,783) Thank you for asking the questions about the budget and please let us know if we can answer any future questions for you regarding the FY21 Budget proposal. Have a great day! 1 Page 23 Item#3. Todd Lavoie,CGFM I Chief Financial Officer City of Meridian I Finance 33 E. Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208.489.0420 C-z(fE II3� The Finance Department—Where Everyone COUNTS! All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in regards to both release and retention,and may be released upon request unless exempt from disclosure by law. From: Chris Johnson <cjohnson@meridiancity.org> Sent: Wednesday,August 12, 2020 9:28 PM To:Todd Lavoie<tlavoie@meridiancity.org> Cc:Adrienne Weatherly<aeatherly@meridiancity.org>; Charlene Way<cway@meridiancity.org> Subject: Fwd: FY21 Budget Comment Todd, We will add this to the record, but I thought you may want to have someone answer the citizen's question. Thank you. Chris Begin forwarded message: From: M Tewell <blaine777 @ tmail.com> Date: August 12, 2020 at 8:06:02 PM MDT To: City Clerk <CityClerk@meridiancity.org> Subject: FY21 Budget Comment NOTE: Comments provided will be provided to the Meridian City Council and become part of the public record. I did a cursory glance at the 2021 Budget. What does the term 'transfers' mean? It appears we are over$13,000,000 in the hole already for the year 2021? How can that be? Blaine Tewell Meridian, ID 83646 2 Page 24 C � WE N DIAN --- IDAHO Planning and Zoning Presentation and Outline Item #4: 2020 UDC Text Amendment (H-2020-0072) Application(s):  UDC Text Amendment Summary of Request: In accord with Meridian City Code 11-5, the Planning Division has applied to amend the text of the Unified Development Code (UDC). For purposes of this application, both the Planning Division and the Code Enforcement Division have work closely to compile a host of changes and combine them into one application. Staff believes these changes are fairly straight-forward and largely administrative in nature; related to process primarily and not development improvement requirements. The text amendment includes updates to multiple sections and the addition of new provisions that pertain to the following:  Code Enforcement and Penalties in Chapter 1;  Specific Use Standards in Chapter 4;  Public Hearing Process in Chapter 5; and the  Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards in Chapter 6. And other miscellaneous sections to improve the administration of the code. The table of the requested changes/additions and supporting commentary explains the purpose of the changes to the UDC. Many of these changes have been vetted with City Council before the application submittal and the draft changes were shared with the UDC Focus Group and others to solicit feedback. In summary, Staff believes the changes proposed with this application will make the implementation and use of the UDC more understandable, useable and enforceable, while greatly improving the transparency and efficiency of the planning and development process. Commission Recommendation: The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on July 16, 2020. At the public hearing, the Commission voted to recommend approval of the subject ZOA request. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing: a. In favor: Planning Division b. In opposition: None c. Commenting: None d. Written testimony: Laren Bailey, Sally Reynolds and Dave Yorgason e. Staff presenting application: Bill Parsons f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s) of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s) of discussion by Commission: a. Staff report and agency comment deadlines b. Placement of public hearing signs c. Review of common driveway standards with phase 2 d. Review of parking standards with phase 2 e. Plan for communicating to the public the timeline for receiving written testimony f Keeping the timeframes of written testimony to 1 day instead of 2 days as proposed in the submitted written testimony 4. Commission change(s) to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: a. None Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: Mike and Malissa Bernard – cut-off times for accepting public testimony; Lacy Ooi, Code Enforcement Supervisor requesting that the proposed code enforcement changes in Chapter 1 be removed from the text amendment for further review. Scott Colaianni will be present to discuss any questions the Council may have with this request. Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2020-0072, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of August 18, 2020, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2020-0072, as presented during the hearing on August 18, 2020, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2020-0072 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance) Item #5: 2020 Comprehensive Plan Policy Prioritization (H-2020-0073) Application(s):  Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Summary of Request: The City of Meridian Planning Division submitted an application for a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment. This amendment does not modify any text in the Comprehensive Plan, except to add priorities and responsible lead information to adopted policies. There are no map amendments or other modifications proposed. There are 492 policies with 380 of them considered to be Action Items. Action items have five priorities listed as either Ongoing, Very High, High, Medium, or Low. The other 112 policies are Goals and Objectives, which are important for context and direction, but are not tasks in and of themselves (they are not prioritized). Goals and objectives list responsible groups for child policies, for tracking and continuity. Policies were also assigned a department for their Responsible Lead and Support. Policies that would otherwise go to a City Commission, were assigned to the Department with the staff liaison/coordinator. No policies were assigned to other agencies. These prioritized policies were developed by Planning Division staff in coordination with all other identified Departments. It is expected that the Mayor and City Council will have their own views on setting the prioritization. After adoption, a regular reporting and update to these policies is expected, usually yearly, to maintain the plans relevancy. Commission Recommendation: The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on July 16, 2020. At the public hearing, the Commission voted to recommend approval of the subject CPAT request. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing: a. In favor: Planning Division b. In opposition: None c. Commenting: None d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Brian McClure f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons 2. Key issue(s) of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s) of discussion by Commission: a. Prioritizing on-going policies and assigning a priority scale from very high to low 4. Commission change(s) to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: a. None Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: None Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2020-0073, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of August 18, 2020, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2020-0073, as presented during the hearing on August 18, 2020, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2020-0073 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance) 7/tem 77 (:> E IDIAN*-----, AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for 2020 UDC Text Amendment (H-2020-0072) by City of Meridian Planning Division A. Request: Text amendments to update certain sections of the City's Unified Development Code (UDC) pertaining to Code Enforcement and Penalties in Chapter 1; Specific Use Standards in Chapter 4; the Public Hearing Process in Chapter 5; and the Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards in Chapter 6. Page 25 PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE : August 18 , 2020 ITEM # ON AGENDA : 4 PROJECT NAME : 2020 UDC Text Amendment (H-2020 - 0072 ) PRINTED FULL NAME For Against Neutral Want to Testify YES OR NO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Item#4. STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING 8/18/2020 DATE: ' 0 TO: Mayor&City Council 16 $$ 26 FROM: Bill Parsons, Current Planning Supervisor 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: H-2020-0072 — 2020 UDC Text Amendment Legend �. LOCATION: City wide AOCI County — 69 Line Future Road I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Meridian Planning Division has applied for a Unified Development Code (UDC)text amendment to update certain sections of the City's Code(UDC) as follows: • Code Enforcement and Penalties in Chapter 1; • Specific Use Standards in Chapter 4; • Public Hearing Process in Chapter 5; and the • Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards in Chapter 6. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: City of Meridian Planning Division 33 E. Broadway Ave, Suite#102 Meridian, ID 83642 Page 1 Page 26 Item#4. III. NOTICING Planning&Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Notification published in 6/26/2020 7/31/2020 newspaper Notification mailed to property owners within 300' NA NA Applicant posted public hearing notice sign on site NA NA Nextdoor posting 6/23/2020 7/28/2020 IV. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS(Comprehensive Plan) A. Comprehensive Plan Text(https://www.meridiancity.org/compplan): 3.01.01B -Update the Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code as needed to accommodate the community's needs and growth trends. Many of the requested code changes below reflect the desire of the Community to have a more transparent and inclusive process to address the current growth trend. Other changes are requested by Code Enforcement to clarify procedural processes in the code and close "loopholes"to improve enforcement of the code. 3.04.01B—Maintain and update the Unified Development Code and Future Land Use Map to implement the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. The UDC changes are tracked through-out the year to ensure the code remains current. The proposed changes are the first round of changes to address some of the concerns brought up throughout the previous year,primarily related to the planning process.A second round of UDC changes are envisioned later this year, after coordination and vetting through the UDC Focus Group. V. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ANALYSIS(UDC In accord with Meridian City Code 11-5,the Planning Division has applied to amend the text of the Unified Development Code(UDC). For purposes of this application,both the Planning Division and the Code Enforcement Division have work closely to compile a host of changes and combine them into one application. Staff believes these changes are fairly straight-forward and largely administrative in nature; related to process primarily and not development improvement requirements.NOTE: Code Enforcement changes are first in the table and pertain to Chapter 1 of the UDC. The text amendment includes updates to multiple sections and the addition of new provisions that pertain to the following: • Code Enforcement and Penalties in Chapter 1; • Specific Use Standards in Chapter 4; • Public Hearing Process in Chapter 5; and the • Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards in Chapter 6. And other miscellaneous sections to improve the administration of the code. Page 2 Page 27 Item#4. Exhibit VII below includes a table of the requested changes/additions and supporting commentary explaining the purpose of the change to the UDC. Many of these changes have been vetted with City Council before the application submittal and the draft changes were shared with the UDC Focus Group and others to solicit feedback. As of the print deadline of this report, Staff received one email from one of the members of the UDC Focus Group pertaining to the submittal timeframes for public testimony(see public record). In summary, Staff believes the changes proposed with this application will make the implementation and use of the UDC more understandable,useable and enforceable,while greatly improving the transparency and efficiency of the planning and development process. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed text amendment to the UDC based on the analysis provided in Section IV and V, modifications in Section VII and the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law listed in Section VIII. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard this item on July 16,2020.At the public hearing,the Commission voted to recommend approval of the subject ZOA request. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Planning Division b. In opposition:None C. Commenting. None d. Written testimony: Laren Bailey Sally Reynolds and Dave Yor ag son e. Staff presentinggpplication: Bill Parsons f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s) testimony a. None 3. Ke, ids)of discussion by Commission: a. Staff report and agency comment deadlines b. Placement of public hearing signs C. Review of common driveway standards with phase 2 d. Review of parking standards with phase 2 e. Plan for communicatingto o the public the timeline for receiving written testimony f Keeping the timeframes of written testimony to I day instead of 2 days as proposed in the submitted written testimony 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. None C. City Council: Enter Summary of City Council Decision. Page 3 Page 28 Item#4. VII. EXHIBITS A. Table of Proposed Text Changes Proposed UDCText Amendments nmCSeawn Tvpic Reason for Change Proposed Change 11-1-11 Code Enforcement Code Enforcement would like to clarify some of the grey 11-1-11:CODE ENFORCEMENT: areas or close loop-holes in various sections of code. A_Duty Ta Enforce: 1.It shall be the duty ofthe Community Development Director or designee to interpret this title. 2.It shall be the duty ofthe Code Enforcement Division ofthe Police Department to enforce the regulations of this title,as set forth in this section.Code Enforcement Officers may call upon the services of the Planning,Fire,Parks or other appropriate City departments to assist in enforcement 3.It is the intent of this title to place the obligation of complying with its requirements upon the owner, occupier or other person responsible for the condition of the land and buildings within the scope of this title. investiffa4ion` 11-1-11 Cont Code Enforcement nC 1170,9 3D 2095,s[9 115 200gr.amEL n -1514-e--1,5-e9 2012jr eR O_15 2005) om�vw7 2005 e{r m_15-200Cr �a-o".-_•-_moo_o^^oI BD.Revocation Of Conditional Use Permit: 1 A conditional use permit may be revoked or modified by the City Council,upon notice and hearing, for breach or violation of any condition of appruval or limitation of the permit 2.If the City Council decides to r ke a conditional use permit,either on its own action or upon complaint to the City Couna the Council shall notify the permit holder of its intention to revoke the permit and provide the permit holder with the opportunity to contest the revocation at a public hearing before the City Council. 3.Fifteen C15]days'prior notice of the hearing shall be given to the permit holder and all property owners within three hundred feet(3C 01 of the boundaries ofthe land for which the permit was issued. 4.The City Council shall nuke findings offact and conclusions oflaw supporting its decision to revoke the conditional use permit If the Council does not decide to revolve the permit no findings of fact and conclusions oflaw shall be made. Page 4 Page 29 Item#4. 11-1-11Cont Code Enforcement LE.Revocation Modification,Or Denial Of Accessory Use Permit: L An accessory use permit maybe revoked or modified by the Director upon a finding of breach or violation of any condition ofapproval or limitation ofthe permit An accessory use permit application may be denied by the Director upon a finding that the proposed use cannot or will not be conducted in compliance with applicable specific use standards.The Director shall provide the permit holder written notice ofthe revocation,modification,or denial,and shall provide the permit holder with information regarding the opportunity to appeal such action. 2.The permit holder or applicant may appeal the Director's revocation modification or derma]ofan accessory use permit Such appeal shall be made in writing,shall state the reasons for such appeal and shall be delivered to the City Clerk via U.S.mail or in person within fourteen(14)days of such revocation modification ordenial.Upon receipt of such written appeal.the City Clerk shall schedule a public hearing on the appeal at a City Council meetingwithin thirty(30)days The Clerk shall provide fifteen Cl 5)days'notice of the hearipgto the permit holder or applicant and all property owners within three hundred feet(300')ofthe boundaries of the land for which the permitwas issued. 3 Following public hearing on the appeal City Council shalt afs—k modify,ar reverse the Directors action and shall issue written findings supporting such decision.The City Council's decision on such appeal shall be a final decision.(Ord 18-1762,1-23-2n113) 11-1-1Z Penalties Code Enforcement would like to clarify some of the grey 11-1-12:PENALTIES: areas or close lump-holes m various sections of code, A. A violation of,or failure to comply with,mW provision ofthis title shall be un]awfuL Any person violating cr failing to mmplly with say of the provisions ofthis title shall be subject to the following penalties: 1.A first conviction of a violation or fdolL to cm 00)with a court c sion of this title shall be an infraction punishable by a fine of twenty-five dollars($25.00}plus court costs. 2.A second conviction-within a period nFfive(S)year,nfa violation or failure to cnmrlvwith a provision ofthis title shall be an infraction punishable by fine offifry dollars CS5C.110Jplus court costs. 3.A third or subsequent conviction within a period offive[5)ye=oFa violation of or Edlure to comply with a provision of this title shall be a misdemeanor. 4.The failure to pay a fine for an infraction penally as sed pursuant to this section shall be a misdemeanor. Hach daynfne ni fiance.with any ofthe provisions ofthix titleshall mnatih:t.a separate o ense- 11-4-3-38 Specific land use name Consistency with use name in Allowed Use tables(Ch.2j. 114-3-3t3:Vehiele Sales cr Rental and So— change-Vehicles Today,the name ofthis land use in Chapter 2 includes Sales/Rental/Service vehicle service;add to name in specific use standards (Ch.4). 11- -6D2a public Hearing posting Instead of 4'x 4'which seems to be overkill,require 18" requirements For x24"for"smaller"applications. a.Conditional use perosit applications for daycare,group:citveouncil review ofaccessory uses in Council Review residential districts:and anne—d.u,preliminary plat,variance,rezone,and comprehensive plan daycares and other, amendment applications for properties of land less than thwo(3)Lwo121 acres in size:The applicant similar,Accessory Use shall pasta sign consisting.f—l l-i,-bye-7-imsh one(1]18-inch by 24-inch piece of paper mounted applications to a rigid surface of at least equal size,or other material statingthe name ofthe applicant,a statement concerning the proposed development,and the date,time and location ofthe public hearing. 11-SA-6C Invite property owners The public wants to be involved earlier in the project C.Neighborhood Meet'nrgs: From Further away to development process so their voice can be better neighborhood meetings considered in design particularly For residential 1.Applicants for applications requiring a public hearing are required to hold a neighborhood meeting to 9,hold the meeting no projects.Five days does not really provide much Beano opportunity For public reviewof the used project prior to the submittal ofan closer than 10 days opportunity for an applicant to consider Feedback from provide ppo ty P prof prof before submittal the neighbors to potentially incorporate into their plans application except a neighborhood meeting is not required for city council review,a vacation and/or before submittal short plat 2.Notice ofthe neighborhood meeting shall be provided to all propertyawners of record within three - h—dred five hundred Feet P5003 of the exterior boundary ofthe application property.Notice oFthe meeting shall be either hand delivered or mailed to the recipients. 3.Notice ofthe meeting shall be provided at least five(5)days�prior to the meeting.The meeting shall be held not more than three(3)months or less than five ten(SIC)days prior to the submittal of an application. .The neighborhood—4hi shall be held on a Mo Tuesday,Wednesday,or Thu excludin holidays),and the meeting shall start between 6:00 pan and 8:00 p.m. 5,The neighbarbood meeting must b e held at a location within&e(5)mll�ofthe proposed pronect site, or at Meridian city hall. Page 5 Page 30 Item#4. 11- -6E Similarto 11-A-6C- E.Mailing And Publishing of The Public Hearing Notice: notice property owners For public hearings .Legal Notice:At least Fifteen(15)days prior to the public hearing,the city shall publish a notice ofthe within 500' time and place and a summary of the application in the official newspaper oFgeneral circulation in Ada County. .Radius Notice: Time Of Notice:At least fifteen(15)days prior to the public hearing,the city shall send a notice by first class mail cfthe time and place,and a summary ofthe application to property owners or purchasers of record(as listed in the current records ofthe Ada County assessor]owning property within three - haudm five hundred Feet[3M of the property being considered. .Notice Extended:The noticing shall be extended to property owners within one thousand feet(1,000') of the external property boundaries For heavy industries and wireless communication facilities. Notice To properties Farther From Exl a nal Boundaries:The director may determine,or other applications provided for in this title may require,that notices be sent to properly owners or purchasers of record whose properties are farther from the external boundaries of the property-than those listed hercim 11-SA-6H Timeline and Standards The City is receiving a lot of information,from the public.H. Written Testimon5a Written testimony submitted for inclusion in the record ofany public hearing A [NEW for Receiving Public applicant and otheragencies,late in the process.To be submitted to the city clerk by noon on the day prior to the day on which the public hearing is SECTION) Testimony ensure written testimony is received in a timely manner scheduled. to be considered bythe decision making body,a deadline for submittal is needed. 11-6C-334 Subdivision street To clear up the intent of restricting dead-end street lengths and names lengths to 500'. B.Streets' m 4.QJ-Be-Sass:Terminal CulDe-Sacs and Read End Streets: a.No streets or series of streets that ends in a cul-de-sac or dead end shall be longer than five hundred feet(5001 except as allowed in subsection b of this section. b.The City Council may approve a dead end street up to seven hundred Fifty feet C750)in length where an ernergeE cy n mess is pmposed:or where there is a physical harrier such as a sheep slope,railroad tracks,an arterial roadway.or large waterway that prevents or makes i mnmactical extension;and where a pedestrian connection is provided from the street to an adjacent existing or planned pedestrian facility. c.Cul-de-sac streets may serve a maximum of thirty(30)dwelling units. d.The length of a cul-de-sac street shall be measured from the near edge of the right oFway to the center of the turnaround. VIII. FINDINGS 1. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT AMENDMENTS: (UDC 11-513-3E) Upon recommendation from the Commission, the Council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant a text amendment to the Unified Development Code,the Council shall make the following findings: A.The text amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Commission finds that the proposed UDC text amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies and Goals, Section IV, of the Staff Report for more information. B. The text amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; and The Commission finds that the proposed zoning ordinance amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare if the changes to the text of the UDC are approved as submitted. It is the intent of the text amendment to further the health, safety and welfare of the public. C. The text amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services Page 6 Page 31 Item#4. by any political subdivision providing public services within the City including, but not limited to,school districts. The Commission finds that the proposed zoning ordinance amendment does not propose any significant changes to how public utilities and services are provided to developments. All City departments,public agencies and service providers that currently review applications will continue to do so.Please refer to any written or oral testimony provided by any public service provider(s)when making this finding. Pagc 7 Page 32 7/tem 77 (:> E IDIAN*-----, AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for 2020 Comprehensive Plan Policy Prioritization (H-2020-0073) by City of Meridian Planning Division A. Request: To amend the text of the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan by adding priority levels and assigning responsible department leads to the existing policies of the Plan. This amendment makes no revisions to the text of the Plan, except to add priorities and responsible leads for the policies adopted in December of 2019. Page 33 PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE : August 18 , 2020 ITEM # ON AGENDA : 5 PROJECT NAME : 2020 Comprehensive Plan Policy Prioritization (11-2020 - 0073 ) PRINTED FULL NAME For Against Neutral Want to Testify YES OR NO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 li 14 15 Item#5. STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING 8/18/2020 DATE: ' 0 TO: Mayor&City Council 16 44 $$ 26 FROM: Brian McClure, Comprehensive Associate Planner 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: H-2020-0073 — 2020 Comprehensive Plan Policy Legend �. Prioritization AOCI LOCATION: Citywide County — 69 Line Future Road I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Meridian Planning Division submitted an application for a Comprehensive Plan Text(CPAT) amendment. This amendment does not modify any text in the Comprehensive Plan, except to add priorities and responsible lead information to adopted policies. There are no map amendments or other modifications proposed. II. PROJECT OVERVIEW There are 492 policies with 380 of them considered to be Action Items. Action items have five priorities listed as either Ongoing,Very High,High,Medium, or Low. The other 112 policies are Goals and Objectives,which are important for context and direction,but are not tasks in and of themselves (they are not prioritized). Goals and objectives list responsible groups for child policies, for tracking and continuity. Policies were also assigned a department for their Responsible Lead and Support. Policies that would otherwise go to a City Commission,were assigned to the Department with the staff liaison/coordinator.No policies were assigned to other agencies. These prioritized policies were developed by Planning Division staff in coordination with all other identified Departments. It is expected that the Mayor and City Council will have their own views on this prioritization,but Planning and Zoning Commission may wish to provide suggestions as well. After adoption, a regular reporting and update to these policies is expected,usually yearly,to maintain the plans relevancy. Following is a breakdown of the policies as proposed by Department, Chapter/Section, and priority. Pagel Page 34 Item#5. Table 1:Prioritization by Lead Section Low Medium High Very High Grand Total CD 5 3 20 11 39 Finance 0 1 0 0 1 Mayor's Office 1 4 3 0 8 P&R 4 6 6 8 24 PD 1 0 0 0 1 PW 3 4 2 3 12 Grand Total 14 18 31 22 85 Table 2: Priorities by Chapter Section Table 3: On-going Items by Department Section Count Section Count Arts and Culture 12 CD 167 Character, Design, and Identity 21 FD 5 Economic Excellence 40 FD, PD 7 Education and Community 17 Finance 3 Services IT 1 Future Land use 22 Legal 3 Growth and Population 54 Mayor's Office 20 Historic Preservation 12 P&R 43 Housing 33 PD 11 Parks and Pathways 38 pW 35 Public Safety 27 Grand Total 295 Stewardship 43 Transportation and Streets 38 Utilities& Infrastructure 23 Grand Total 380 The following are general time periods for each of the priorities: • Very High=Currently/Immediately; • High= 1 to 3 years; • Medium=3 to 5 years; • Low=5 to 10 years; and • Ongoing=regular duties or at every opportunity. Page 2 Page 35 Item#5. III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: City of Meridian Planning Division, 33 E Broadway Ave, Suite 102,Meridian, Idaho 83642 B. Owner: Not applicable. C. Representative: Not applicable. IV. NOTICING Planning&Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Notification published in 6/26/2020 7/31/2020 newspaper Notification mailed to property owners within 300' Not applicable Not applicable Applicant posted public hearing notice sign on site Not applicable Not applicable Nextdoor posting 6/23/2020 7/28/2020 V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS(Comprehensive Plan) A. Comprehensive Plan Text(https://www.meridiancity.org/compplan): When the Comprehensive Plan (Plan)was adopted in December of 2019, one of the Next Steps described in the Plan and at the hearings was to prioritize the policies. This text can be found in Chapter 1, Making the Plan Reality, under Next Steps (https:llmeridianciU.oMIplannin /�pplan/introduction#reality). This section of the Plan says, After adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, one of the first steps will be to prioritize the action items listed in the Plan. City Departments and other stakeholders will be part of the process to determine which action items are immediate, intermediate, or long-term priorities. This consolidated list of the action items will be referred to as the Implementation Plan of the Comprehensive Plan and it will establish both an action item lead and support, including all City departments or civic organizations that need to be involved in completing each action. After staff consensus on priorities, the draft policies will be shared with the Mayor and City Council. The intent of the Implementation Plan is to provide transparency to the community and ensure timely execution of the Comprehensive Plan's action items through assigned responsibilities and priorities. Prioritization is required for efficient implementation of the Plan, which will assist with transparency and for monitoring and reporting progress in future years. Monitoring has a specific policy, 3.04.01 E, which says, "Monitor the progress of the Comprehensive Plan implementation plan to ensure steady progress." Page 3 Page 36 Item#5. After City Council approves these policies, and to include any changes,Planning staff will prepare a revised final copy with all approved changes of the Plan for the findings. Due to the increase text associated the prioritization and responsible lead information,most chapters may have increased page counts. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments as proposed. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard this item on July 16,2020. At the public hearing,the Commission voted to recommend approval of the subject CPAT request. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing: a. In favor: Planning Division b. In opposition:None c. Commenting. None d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Brian McClure f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons 2. Key issue(s) testimony a. None 3. Ke, ids)of discussion by Commission: a. Prioritizing on-going policies and assigning a priority scale from very high to low 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: a. None B. City Council: Enter Summary of City Council Decision. Page 4 Page 37 Item#5. VII. EXHIBITS A. Adopted Comprehensive Plan Policies+Priorities and Responsible Lead Information SupportID Policy Section Section Symbols Priority Responsible Lead 2.00.00 Chapter 2 Premier 0 Community CD,Mayor's CD,Legal, 00 Support a balance and integration of diverse housing and neighborhood Encourage diverse housing options suitable for various income levels,household CD,Mayor's Legal,Mayor's 2.01.01 sizes,and lifestyle preferences. Housing Office Office 2.01.01A Align City Code with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan to reflect the community's Housing Very High CD Legal desires for various types,sizes,and designs of residential neighborhoods. 2.01.01E Regularly assess permitting activity and work to encourage a mix of housing types. Housing On-going CD 2.01.01C Maintain a range of residential land use designations that allow diverse lot sizes, Housing On-going CD housing types,and densities. 2.01.01D Regularly monitor local codes and ordinances to ensure compliance with state and Housing On-going CD federal laws such as the Fair Housing Act. Encourage development of universally accessible home designs within new 2.01.01E developments and home retrofits,allowing residents to age in place and creating full Housing On-going CD accessibility for all residents of varying levels of physical ability. 2.01.01F Maintain clear and concise housing development ordinances,codes,requirements, Housing On-going CD restrictions,and policies that are consist with the Comprehensive Plan. 2.01.01G Avoid the concentration of any one housing type or lot size in any geographical area; Housing On-going CD provide for diverse housing types throughout the City. Locate higher density housing near corridors with existing or planned transit, 2.01.01H Housing On-going CD Downtown,and in proximity to employment centers. 2.01.011 Consider providing incentives to developers that produce affordable housing units as Housing Low CD CD,Legal, defined by federal and state agencies. Mayor's Office 2.01.011 Support an open housing market for all persons,regardless of protected class. Housing On-going CD 2.01.01K Remove regulatory barriers and develop design criteria that support the construction Housing Medium CD of accessory dwelling units and micro homes where appropriate. 2.01.01L Ensure the Unified Development Code provides opportunities for diverse and Housing On-going CD innovative housing options. 2.01.01M Support active-adult or independent senior living developments. Housing On-going CD 2.01.01N Work with the County/State on developing property tax relief programs for seniors Housing Low Mayor's Office and others on low/fixed incomes. 2.01.02 Support a balance of housing tenure and supply and demand. Housing .� CD Page 5 Page 38 Item#5. ID Policy Section Section Symbols Priority Responsible Support Regularly monitor property tax revenue and vacancy rates in the rental and ownership 2.01.02A Housing On going CD market. Coordinate and align public and private housing development to improve consistency 2.01.026 Housing On-going CD with local housing agency plans. 2.01.02C Explore ways to encourage diversity of housing tenure and price points. Housing High CD Encourage a variety of housing types that meet the needs,preferences,and financial 2.01.02D capabilities of Meridian's present and future residents. Housing On going CD Support housing affordability,special-needs housing,ownership opportunities,and 2.01.02E housing rehabilitation through programs administered by the State of Idaho,Ada Housing On-going CD County,nonprofits,and federal agencies. 2.02.00 Plan for safe,attractive,and well-maintained neighborhoods open Housing CID FID,Finance, space,and generous amenities that provide varied lifestyle choices. Legal,P&R, •D 2.02.01 Elevate and enhance the quality and connectivity of residential site and subdivision Housing � CD FD,Finance, planning. Legal,P&R,PD With new subdivision plats,require the design and construction of pathways 2.02.01A connections,easy pedestrian and bicycle access to parks,safe routes to schools,and Housing On-going CD P&R the incorporation of usable open space with quality amenities. 2.02.0113 Evaluate open space and amenity requirement and criteria for consistency with Housing Very High CD P&R,PD community needs and values. Require all new residential neighborhoods to provide complete streets,consistent 2.02.01C with the Transportation and Land Use Integration Plan. Housing On going CD FD 2.02.01D Require pedestrian access in all new development to link subdivisions together and Housing On-going CD promote neighborhood connectivity. Encourage the development of high quality,dense residential and mixed use areas 2.02.01E near in and around Downtown,near employment,large shopping centers,public open Housing On-going CD spaces and parks,and along major transportation corridors,as shown on the Future Land Use Map. Evaluate the potential to incentivize dedication of public school sites,public parks and 2.02.01F other open spaces,and public access easements to linear open space corridors,which Housing Low CD Finance,P&R contain bicycle and/or pedestrian pathway systems. Ensure development provides safe routes and access to schools,parks,and other 2.02.01G Housing On-going CD community gathering places. 2.02.01H Evaluate and improve the current grading and stormwater drainage requirements for Housing Very High PW CD,Legal subdivisions to ensure they reflect the community's values. 2.02.02 Maximize public services by prioritizing infill development of vacant and Housing CD CD,Finance, underdeveloped parcels within the City over parcels on the fringe. Legal,PW Develop standards for upkeep of vacant lots such as dust and weed mitigation 2.02.02A Housing Low PD CD requirements. Page 6 Page 39 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Res onsible ... Lead 2.02.0213 Consider incentives such as density bonuses,reduced open space requirements,and Housing Very High CD Finance,Legal, reduced fees for infill development in key areas near existing services. PW Support infill development that does not negatively impact the abutting,existing 2.02.02C development. Infill projects in Downtown should develop at higher densities, Housing On-going CD irrespective of existing development. Apply appropriate design and construction standards to infill development in order to 2.02.02D Housing On-going CD reduce adverse impacts to existing development. 2.02.02E Assist development groups to develop multiple plats into one cohesive plat. Housing On-going CD 2.02.02F Ensure that new development within existing residential neighborhoods is cohesive Housing Very High CD and complementary in design and construction. Education and 2.03.00 Improve coordinationof long . school district planning. . r Services Jointly plan and site schools and subdivisions to ensure mutual benefits, Education and 2.03.01 Community 0 CD neighborhood identity,and community health. Services Assist West Ada School District in identifying potential future school sites,by providing Education and 2.03.01A information about anticipated future land uses,utilities,and entitlements. Community Q On-going CD Services Support construction of multi-use facilities that can be used by both schools and the Education and 2.03.0113 community. Community Q On-going CD Services Invite West Ada School District staff to pre-application meetings with potential Education and 2.03.01C developers and discuss school siting and access needs. Community Q On-going CD Services Ensure the location and design of schools are compatible with existing and planned Education and 2.03.011) neighborhoods and land uses. Community Q On-going CD Services Work with West Ada School District to locate and connect schools to safe and Education and 2.03.01E accessible walking,bicycle,transit,and automobile routes. Community Q On-going CD Services Coordinate with public safety officials and other local agencies to ensure safe school Education and 2.03.02 Community Q PD FD environments. Services Support educational and training programs lead by school resource officers and Education and 2.03.02A neighborhood contact officers. Community Q On-going PD FD Services Page 7 Page 40 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Res onsible ... Lead Education and 1 �� r Off ice CID,FID, D Services Partner with schools,non-profits,and other community-based organizations to Education and 2.04.01 Provide a variety of educational opportunities throughout all stages of life Community Mayor's Office CD,FD,P&R,PD Services Support a network of public resources,schools,community centers and other public Education and 2.04.01A facilities that address the city's educational and training needs. Community Q On-going Mayor's Office FD, P&R,PD,PW Services Encourage educational institutions and community organizations to provide a broad Education and 3.04.0113 set of programs within the community,including programs for special needs students, Community Q On-going Mayor's Office early childhood,the arts,math and science,English as a Second Language,and life Services skills. Education and 2.04.01C Investigate potential public-private partnerships to provide additional health and Community Q Medium Mayor's Office CD,P&R educational programs. Services Plan for a multi-generational• •• resources for existing and future residents of all ages.with adequate public services and health care Education and • • • t Office,P&R Office,P&R Services Education and CD,Mayor's Mayor's Office, 2.05.01 Cooperate with other agencies and service providers around the Valley. Community Q Office,P&R P&R, Services Education and 2.05.01A Identify partnerships that support multi-generational activities. Community Q Medium Mayor's Office P&R Services Continue to support the Meridian senior citizens'organization as an important social Education and 2.05.0113 program in the community. Community Q On-going Mayor's Office P&R Services Supportjoint use agreements with the West Ada School District,Meridian Library Education and 2.05.01C Community Q On-going Mayor's Office P&R District,and other private and non-profit entities. Services Coordinate planning efforts and strategic growth of the City with other service Education and 2.05.01D providers and local decision-makers. Community Q On-going CD Mayor's Office Services Support and encourage involvement of seniors in activities,groups,and volunteer Education and 2.05.01E opportunities. Community Q On-going Mayor's Office P&R Services Page 8 Page 41 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Res onsible ... Lead Support and encourage involvement of community youth in the Mayor's Youth Education and 2.05.01F Advisory Council(MYAC)and other youth activities,groups and volunteer Community Q On-going P&R Mayor's Office opportunities. Services Strengthen public services,programs,and community resources to be responsive to Education and 2.05.01G Community Q On-going P&R Mayor's Office and representative of Meridian's diversity. Services Education and 2.05.02 Support access to high-quality emergency care,primary,outpatient,home care, Community 0 Mayor's Office CD,FD long-term care,and mental health care within the community. Services Education and 2.05.02A Encourage the expansion of medical service related industries that are needed. Community Q On-going Mayor's Office CD,FD Services positionEnhance Meridian's economic and 2.06.00 $economy. Excellence • Office, PW 2.06.01 Diversify Meridian's economic base to establish and maintain a self-sustaining,full- Economic © Mayor's Office, CD,Finance, Mayor's Office, service economy. Excellence CD PW 2.06.01A Provide location-specific standards as incentives to attract high-quality businesses and Economic © Medium Mayor's Office CD,Finance living-to-high wage jobs. Excellence Establish methods to support the business community by drafting an Economic Economic 2.06.0113 Development Plan in partnership with the Meridian Chamber of Commerce and © High CD Mayor's Office Meridian Development Corporation. Excellence Regularly conduct industry market analysis to determine feasibility of existing and Economic 2.06.01C emerging industries to better understand workforce,land use,and transportation © On-going CD Mayor's Office needs. Excellence 2.06.01D Encourage environmentally-friendly industries. Economic © On-going CD Mayor's Office Excellence 2.06.01E Focus on developing industries that tend exceed the living wage,such as technology, Economic © High CD Mayor's Office healthcare and other similar industries. Excellence 2.06.02 Support economic opportunities for a community with diverse income levels. conomic © On-going CD Mayor's Office xcellence 2.06.02A Regularly assess changes in local income levels. Economic © On-going CD Mayor's Office Excellence 2.06.0213 Pursue public-private partnerships and economic development grants that bring Economic © On-going CD Mayor's Office additional job opportunities to the community. Excellence 2.06.02C Coordinate with the public,private,and non-profit sectors on possibilities for Economic © On-going CD Mayor's Office creating/sustaining workforce housing. Excellence Page 9 Page 42 Item#5. SectionID Policy Section .•ls Priority Responsible Support Lead 2.06.02D Work to encourage a diversity of housing,recreation,and mobility options to attract Economic On-going Mayor's Office and sustain the local workforce. Excellence © g g CD supportsCreate a business-friendly environment that 2.07.00 opportunities by developing a diverse and qualified • • • educational $ CD Mayor'sOffice Excellence partnerships. - 2.07.01 Promote business retention ex ansionr and im rovement pro ra Economic ©Excellence CD Mayor's Office 2.07.01A Connect businesses with local,state,regional,and federal resources for incentives, Economic © On-going CD Mayor's Office resources,and opportunities. Excellence 2.07.0113 Establish and maintain relationships with existing businesses and industry groups to Economic © On-going CD Mayor's Office determine present and future needs. Excellence 2.07.02 Implement a clear development application review process for new and expanding Economic © CD businesses. Excellence 2.07.02A Streamline the approval process for development proposals that are consistent with Economic © Very High CD the vision and values of the community. Excellence 2.07.0213 Maintain the integrity of public process and transparency of development review. Economic © On-going CD Excellence Encourage developers to engage with the public early in the development proposal Economic 2.07.02C © On-going CD process. Excellence 2.07.02D Review development regulations to ensure an efficient process and remove Economic © High CD unnecessarily burdensome costs and delays. Excellence 2.07.03 Support innovative workforce development training,technology,and education to Economic © CD meet the needs of a diverse workforce. Excellence Coordinate with business leaders and local,regional,state,and non-profit job-oriented Economic 2.07.03A programs to match existing and anticipated business and industry needs and identify © On-going CD gaps in workforce education and training needs.2. Excellence Economic • Office, 1 11 .. . S Excellence Office CD, 2.08.01 Develop effective marketing tools and regional partnerships. Economic © CD Mayor's Office Excellence 2.08.01A Develop and maintain marketing materials to share with targeted industries. Economic © High CD Excellence 2.08.016 Strengthen relationships with economic development sources for new business Economic © On-going CD Mayor's Office referrals and opportunities. Excellence Pursue economic development opportunities with technology,healthcare, Economic 2.08.02 environmentally friendly manufacturing,light industrial,and professional service © Mayor's Office CD,P&R industries. Excellence Page 10 Page 43 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Responsible ... Lead 2.08.02A Make Meridian the premier place to create,attract,and retain high-quality businesses Economic On-going Mayor's Office CD, P&R and a talented workforce. Excellence © g g Capitalize on the City's central location by promoting more tourism and business Economic 2.08.026 growth along entryways and key corridors. Excellence © On-going Mayor's Office CD 2.08.03 Encourage new dynamic,sustainable,and collaborative opportunities that enhance Economic Mayor's Office, CD Meridian's existing and planned industrial nodes. Excellence © CD Keep the Future Land Use Map current by defining appropriate locations for industrial, Economic 2.08.03A commercial,and office businesses. Excellence © On going CD 2.08.03E Identify and consider services and programs desired by potential businesses within the Economic © Medium Mayor's Office CD industrial areas. Excellence 2.08.03C Work with existing industrial businesses to expand or relocate operations to Economic © On-going Mayor's Office CD appropriate areas. Excellence •. 51P CD,Finance, 2.09.01 Support redevelopment and infill opportunities Downtown. Economic © Mayor's Office, Excellence P&R 2.09.01A Pursue public-private partnerships to develop parking facilities. Economic © High CD Finance, Excellence Mayor's Office 2.09.01E Establish incentives to develop gathering spaces and civic facilities within Downtown. Economic © High CD Finance,P&R Excellence 2.09.01C Work towards mitigating and removing floodplain issues around Downtown. Economic © High PW CD Excellence Pursue grant and other funding mechanisms to fund complete street and streetscape Economic 2.09.01D © On-going CD improvements. Excellence 2.09.01E Explore incentives for targeted projects that meet economic development goals. Economic © High CD Excellence Integrate and maintain quality publ► owntown for recreation, Economic CD,Mayor's 2.09.02 social,and civic activities. Excellence © Office,P&R Mayor's Office 2.09.02A Actively implement action items in the Destination Downtown Plan. Economic © High Mayor's Office CD Excellence 2.09.02E Pursue grants and public-private partnerships to enhance Downtown. Economic © On-going CD Excellence 2.09.02C Develop programs with local partners to expand art,cultural,and educational facilities Economic © Medium P&R Mayor's Office in Downtown. Excellence 2.09.02D Develop and support regular cultural activities and events Downtown,in partnership Economic © Medium P&R Mayor's Office with the Downtown Business Association and other organizations. Excellence Page 11 Page 44 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Responsible ... Lead 2.09.02E Implement consistent landscaping,li and historic reservation standards. Economic On- CD p lighting, p Excellence © On-going g 2.09.02F Support a compatible mix of land uses Downtown that activate the area during day Economic © On-going CD and night. Excellence Implement the City of Meridian Design Standards and City of Meridian Architectural Economic 2.09.02G Standards Manual to ensure that Downtown remains the historic center for mixed-use © On-going CD tourism,business,retail,residential,and governmental activities. Excellence L09.03 Cultivate unique and diverse destination-type activities within Meridian's centers. Economic Excellence 1jr CD,P&R Mayor's Office, CD 2.09.03A Establish distinct,engaging identities within commercial and mixed use centers Economic © High CD through design standards. Excellence 2.09.03E Promote Ten Mile,Downtown,and The Village as centers of activity and growth. Economic © On-going CD Excellence Support public-private partnerships that provide plazas and public areas within activity Economic Mayor's Office, 2.09.03C centers. Excellence © On going P&R CD 2.09.03D Develop a collaborative economic development strategy to recruit new businesses. Economic © High CD Excellence 2.09.03E Develop concept plans of potential destination activities and promote appropriate Economic © Low CD development,infill,and redevelopment of activity centers. Excellence 3.00.00 Chapter 3 EvolvingCommunity ® © ® 3.01.00 Recognize that Meridian's population will continue to grow and positively foster Growth and CD All Meridian's continued growth. I Population ih 3.01.01 Provide facilities and services that maintain a premier level of service commensurate Growth and ® CD All with growth. Ponulatinn Evaluate comprehensive impacts of growth and consider City Master Plans and Growth and 3.01.01A Strategic Plans in all land use decisions(e.g.,traffic impacts,school enrollment,and ® On-going CD All parks). Population 3.01.01E Update the Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code as needed to Growth and ® On-going CD accommodate the community's needs and growth trends. Population Ensure that regulations and plans support and encourage desired development and Growth and 3.01.01C land use patterns within the Area of City Impact. Population On-going CD Evaluate development proposals based on consistency with the vison as well as Growth and 3.01.01D physical,social,economic,environmental,and aesthetic criteria. Population High CD Coordinate with the City of Nampa,Canyon County,Star,Eagle,Kuna,Boise,and Ada Growth and 3.01.01E County on land use,transportation,and emergency services. Population ® On going CD All Page 12 Page 45 Item#5. • Policy Section Section SymbolsSupportResonsible Lead Maintain and 's infrastructure to meet and Growth and Finance, A ,CI Finance, • •• and the tt Office, growing demands in a timely,orderly,and logical manner. Population PW 3.02.01 Develop and implement master plans for all public facilities,services,and safety to Growth and Finance,® Mayor's Office, All,CD,Finance, guide the growth of the City. Population PW HR I Provide City utilities in high priority growth areas and discourage in low priority growth Growth and 3.02.01A � On-going PW areas. Population Protect investments in existing public facilities(water,sewer,streets,fire,police,etc.) Growth and 3.02.016 by ensuring extension of services by new development is in the best interest of the On-going PW CD City. Population Utilize preferred methods of communication with citizens and engage their input on Growth and 3.02.01C public facilities planning,construction,and funding. Population On going PW Support the appropriate expansion of City facilities,services,staff,and other resources Growth and 3.02.01D to keep up with demand and established levels of service. Population On going PW CD, Finance, HR Phase-in developments in accordance with their connection to the municipal sewer Growth and 3.02.01E � On-going PW CD and water system and the provision of other necessary infrastructure and services. Population Maintain an efficient and fair system of fees and development requirements that Growth and 3.02.01F assesses the costs and benefits of financing public facilities and services,the need for population m On-going Finance CD,PW which is generated by new development. 3.02.01G Establish and maintain levels of service for public facilities and services,including Growth and ® High Mayor's Office All water,sewer,police,transportation,schools,fire,and parks. Population NOVI ..111111111 11111111 11111 111 11111111111 Will IIIIIIq1I III 1111pill 11111 11111111 .. • 3.03.01 Plan for an appropriate land use mix,recreational and civic facilities,and phased Growth and service extension within specific area plans and urban renewal districts. Population Continue to develop and implement the desired vision in special areas,areas with Growth and 3.03.01A specific plans,and along key transportation corridors. Population ® On going CD Actively engage with City leadership and community members to explore the idea, Growth and 3.03.016 process,and potential impacts of implementing districts,subareas,neighborhood Population ® On-going CD association areas,or similar concepts. Consider developing new subarea plans as appropriate for areas with unique 3.03.01C characteristics,public/private partnerships in place,and that are compatible with Growth and ® Very High CD All Comprehensive Plan policies in order to provide additional guidance on future land Population uses,design,infrastructure,and amenities. Ensure that adequate water supply and pressure are available for fire protection in Growth and 3.03.01D areas suitable for industrial and commercial uses. Population ® On-going PW Page 13 Page 46 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Responsible ... Lead 3.03.01E Encourage infill development. Growth and ® High CD Population 3.03.02 Prioritae growt an evelopment where it furthers the City's vision and allows for Growth ang CD,PW All,CD the efficient provision of servic Population 3.03.02A Engage with service providers,City leadership,and community members to identify Growth and Very High CD All priority growth areas. Population 3.03.02E Focus future investments within established priority growth areas. Growth and m On going CD All Population 3.03.02C Utilize the City's Service Impact Tool to help identify potential strategic growth areas. Growth and ® On-going CD All Population As part of establishing and implementing strategic growth areas,consider including targeted redevelopment/opportunity areas within the Area of City Impact,areas Growth and 3.03.02D within the City limits and within a specified distance of major utility connections,and Population ® Very High CD All unincorporated county enclaves suitable for annexation. 3.03.02E Develop incentives for appropriate investment in strategic growth areas;discourage Growth and ® Very High CD All development outside of established growth areas. Population Require proposed development within areas further away from urban services, existing utilities or requiring significant City utility upgrades,to demonstrate fiscal Growth and 3.03.02E benefits,strategic fit with the Comprehensive Plan,contiguity with existing Population On-going CD development,and appropriate mitigation for any impacts to existing City service users. Build and provide services in a manner that promotes the vision of priority growth Growth and 3.03.02G areas,reinforcing and protecting Meridian's growth objectives. Population ® On going PW CD 3.03.02H Require rural area residential development to submit alternative development plan to Growth and ® On-going PW CD allow for the efficient extension of urban services in the future(resubdivision plan). Population Annex lands into the corporate boundaries of the City only when the annexation Growth and 3.03.03 proposal conforms to the City's vision and the necessary extension of public services ® PW,CD CD,All and infrastructure is provided. Population Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in Growth and 3.03.03A conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect Population On-going CD PW at the time of development. Implement an irrevocable consent to annexation as a condition of hook-up to City Growth and 3.03.03E sanitary sewer or water and make a deed restriction on all buildable lots to be placed Population On-going PW CD as a note on all final plats. 3.03.03C Require all City sewer and water inspections and plan review fees(for the main lines) Growth and On-going PW CD in effect at the time of development be paid to the City of Meridian. Population 3.03.03D Require all development to be consistent with Future Land Use Map designations for Growth and On-going CD the property. Population Page 14 Page 47 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Res onsible ... Lead 3.03.03E Require all development to be contiguous to the City. Growth and On-going CD Population Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public Growth and 3.03.03F facilities and urban services at the time of final approval,and in accord with any Population On-going CD All adopted levels of service for public facilities and services. 3.03.03G Require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments,including curb and Growth and ® On-going CD gutter,sidewalks,water and sewer utilities. Population 3.03.03H Evaluate both the short and longer-term fiscal and environmental impacts of annexing Growth and ® On-going CD All lands. Population 3.03.031 Evaluate the feasibility of annexing existing county enclaves and discourage the Growth and On-going CD creation of additional enclaves. Population Encourage the assembly of parcels for master planning,design and entitlement Growth and 3.03.031 purposes;discourage piecemeal annexation and development. Population ® On going CD 3.03.04 Plan for transportation connectivity and the provision of adequate urban utilities and Growth and ® CD Legal,PW services for county enclaves. Population Plan for connectivity between annexed parcels and county enclaves that may develop Growth and 3.03.04A ® On-going CD at a higher intensity. Population Ensure existing county enclaves provide necessary urban-level transportation and Growth and 3.03.04B utility infrastructure as part of the annexation process. Population On going CD PW Consider the establishment of improvement districts,extra-ordinary impact fee areas, Growth and 3.03.04C and other funding mechanisms to provide the necessary urban infrastructure and Population ® High CD Legal,PW services for existing county enclaves. 3.04.00 Shape the future of the Citycoordination through implementation and CD,IT,Mayor's itAll,CD, Officeplanning efforts. Population Advance,support and promote development of City planning tools,including the Growth and CD,IT,Mayor's 3.04.01 Comprehensive Plan,City ordinances,plans,and other guiding documents that Population ® Office All,PW execute the City's vision. Promote the Comprehensive Plan as the primary guide for growth and development of Growth and 3.04.01A ® On-going CD the community. Population Maintain and update the Unified Development Code and Future Land Use Map to Growth and 3.04.01B implement the provisions of this Comprehensive Plan. Population ® On going CD 3.04.01C Support and expand the capabilities of all City Departments and Staff to better serve Growth and On-going Mayor's Office All the community. Population 3.04.011) Maintain,update,and find better ways to use Geographic Information Systems(GIS)in Growth and ® On-going IT All, PW everyday City business and for project-specific purposes. Population 3.04.01E Monitor the progress of the Comprehensive Plan implementation plan to ensure Growth and ® On-going CD steady progress. Population Page 15 Page 48 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Res onsible ... Lead Review the policies within the adopted Comprehensive Plan on a regular basis and Growth and 3.04.01E ® On going Mayor's Office All update as needed to ensure that they reflect,support,and advance the City's vision. Population Participate in planning efforts with COMPASS and affiliated local governments and Growth and 3.04.01G agencies to better coordinate planning policies regionally. Population On going CD PW 3.04.01H Organize and fund committees or special commissions consistent with the provisions Growth and ® On-going Mayor's Office All of this Comprehensive Plan. Population Enforce the Unified Development Code and all other City ordinances and ensure their Growth and 3.04.011 alignment with the Comprehensive Plan. Population On going CD 3.04.02 Engage and inform the public about land use planning processes. Growth and ® CD,Mayor's CD Population Office Solicit public participation in the land use and entitlement process through a variety of Growth and 3.04.02A � On-going CD digital and in person methods. Population Hold public meetings in conjunction with updates to the Comprehensive Plan to Growth and 3.04.02B promote a better understanding of the plan and its purpose. Population a] On going Mayor's Office CD Convey the Comprehensive Plan's legal elements and intent by informing and Growth and 3.04.02C educating the public,agencies and service providers,advisory boards and other ca On-going CD stakeholders to improve the overall planning process. Population 3.04.02D Improve the neighborhood meeting and public notice process. Growth and ® Very High CD Legal Population Ensure that all planning,zoning and land use decisions balance the interests of the Growth and 00 community by protecting private propertyPopulation Lega I CD tt 3.05.01 Enact land use ordinances,policies,and fees,and make decisions,including land use Growth and ® Legal CD restrictions and conditions of approval,that do not violate private property rights. Population Conduct regular training with City Council,Planning&Zoning Commission,and City Growth and 3.05.01A staff to ensure that Idaho Code section 67-8003 is properly applied in land use On-going Legal CD planning and development review processes. Population Regularly review policies,the Unified Development Code,and other City regulations Growth and 3.05.01B ® On-going Legal CD for consistency with Idaho Code. Population Preserve private property rights and values by enforcing regulations that will prevent Growth and 3.05.01C and mitigate against incompatible and detrimental neighboring uses. Population3. ® On going Legal CD Office, i. ii y3 CID Mayor's PW 3.06.01 Plan for periodic review,monitoring,and updating of land uses within City limits and Future Land use © CD Mayor's Office Area of City Impact. 3.06.01A Maintain the Future Land Use Map to reflect existing facilities. Future Land use © On-going CD 3.06.01B Monitor and adjust the amount and mix of industrial,commercial,and office areas Future Land use © High CD needed to meet the employment needs of the City. Page 16 Page 49 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Res onsible_ Support Coordinate with Ada County to ensure all applicable land use ordinances and , 3.06.01C provisions of this Plan are recognized when development within the Area of City Future Land use © On-going CD Mayor's Office Impact but outside City Limits is proposed. Plan for an appropriate mix of land uses that ensu=onnectivity,livability,an rO6.02 economic vitality. Future Land use © JW PW Support the inclusion of small-scale neighborhood commercial areas within planned 3.06.02A residential developments as part of the development plan,where appropriate. Future Land use © On-going CD Encourage and support mixed-use areas that provide the benefits of being able to live, 3.06.026 shop,dine,play,and work in close proximity,thereby reducing vehicle trips,and Future Land use © On-going CD enhancing overall livability and sustainability. 3.06.02C Encourage the development of supportive commercial near employment areas. Future Land use © On-going CD 3.06.02D Plan for industrial areas with convenient access to state highways or the rail corridor, Future Land use © On-going CD where appropriate. Discourage residential land uses in close proximity to the Wastewater Resource 3.06.02E Recovery Facility,the Intermountain Gas Facility on Can-Ada Road,and other Future Land use © High CD PW incompatible land uses. 3.06.02F Allocate land uses near the rail corridor to both support industrial and freight Future Land use © On-going CD movement but also residential and the movement of people within the corridor. 3.07.00 Encourage compatible uses and site design to minimize conflicts and maximize use of Future Land use CID P&R Ii07.01 _Preaetively address netential eenflicts between incompatible uses_ Future Land use _ © CD Require all new development to create a site design compatible with surrounding uses 3.07.01A through buffering,screening,transitional densities,and other best site design Future Land use © On-going CD practices. 3.07.016 Encourage land uses and site designs that do not harm natural systems and resources. Future Land use © On-going CD 3.07.01C Require appropriate landscaping,buffers,and noise mitigation with new development Future Land use © On-going CD along transportation corridors(setback,vegetation,low walls,berms,etc.). Preserve the industrial base within designated industrial land use areas by 3.07.01D discouraging non-industrial uses and focusing on light manufacturing,distribution, Future Land use © High CD flex-space,and base-employment. Where feasible,encourage large transmission and pipeline utility corridors to function 3.07.01E as transitional buffers,parkland,pathways,and gathering spaces within and adjacent Future Land use © On-going CD to their right of way. Lhe ntegrate land use and transportation planning to ensure that they mutually support CD P&R communities'goals and desires. A 3.07.02A Require pedestrian circulation plans to ensure safety and convenient access across Future Land use © On-going CD large commercial and mixed-use developments. Page 17 Page 50 Item#5. ID Policy Section Section Symbols Priority Responsible Support Locate smaller-scale,neighborhood-serving commercial and office use clusters so they 3.07.02B complement and provide convenient access from nearby residential areas,limiting Future Land use © On-going CD access to arterial roadways and multimodal corridors. 3.07.02C Focus development and redevelopment intensity on key transportation corridors. Future Land use © On-going CD 3.07.02D Pursue transit-supportive densities of residential and employment uses along key Future Land use © On-going CD multi-modal corridors. 3.07.02E Explore the development of additional design guidelines or standards for transit- Future Land use © On-going CD oriented development. 3.07.02F Coordinate with transportation agencies to align future needed infrastructure with Future Land use © On-going CD land use plans and implement through the development review processes. Coordinate with transportation agencies,private property owners and the public to 3.07.02G plan for appropriate land uses that will accommodate both freight and public Future Land use © On-going CD transportation access within the rail corridor. 3.07.02H Integrate the Meridian Pathways Master Plan into the site development review Future Land use © On-going CD P&R process to ensure planned paths are built out as adjacent land develops. Coordinate3.08.00 • Officeexisting and future residents and businesses are met. Infrastructure Mayor's 3.08.01 Plan and expand public utility facilities and services as part of the development Utilities& ® CD All process. Infrastructure 3.08.01A Require that development projects have planned for the efficient provision of all Utilities& On-going CD All public services. Infrastructure 3.08.016 Require adequate fees from new development to fund expansion of services. Utilities& On-going CD All Infrastructure Ensure that other City departments,area agencies,and service providers are informed Utilities& 3.08.01C about and have an opportunity to participate in the City's development review Infrastructure On-going CD All process. 3.08.01D Consider the impact on key service providers prior to acting on annexation requests at Utilities& On-going CD All a public hearing. Infrastructure Ensure key service providers have provided written comment on the impact and Utilities& 3.08.01E potential mitigation measures that may be necessary,prior to acting on large On-going CD All development applications. Infrastructure 3.08.02 oopera a with other agencies and service providers around the Valley to i i ies a PW,P&R, CD,IT,PW rantinunuclu nrnuida accanfinl caruiroc and utilitioc fn nit rocidanfc_ Infracfrurfura Mayor's Office 3.08.02A Communicate planning efforts with local decision makers and utility service providers, Utilities& ® On-going PW CD including irrigation districts,energy,natural gas,solid waste,and telecommunications. Infrastructure 3.08.0213 Coordinate with developers,irrigation districts,and drainage entities to implement the Utilities& Very High P&R CD proposed pathway network along canals,ditches,creeks,laterals and sloughs. Infrastructure Page 18 Page 51 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Responsible ... Lead Regularly coordinate with other public utilities and essential service providers and Utilities& 3.08.02C On going PW CD annually review master plans for public facilities and services;update as needed. Infrastructure Coordinate with Idaho Power to make additions and improvements to their facilities so Utilities& 3.08.02D that adequate capacity for projected growth is realized. Infrastructure On-going CD 3.08.02E Encourage the enhancement of the capacity and reliability of renewable energy Utilities& On-going PW CD resources. Infrastructure 3.08.02E Encourage multi-use utility corridors. Utilities& Infrastructure 0 On going 3.08.02G Support the expansion of and accessibility to high-speed internet and broadband Utilities& On-going Mayor's Office IT,PW throughout the Area of City Impact. Infrastructure 3.08.03 Coordinate with utility providers on acceptable landscape materials,design and site tilities& locations for their future facilities to avoid negative impacts to the community. frastructure 3.08.03A Minimize the impact of electric facilities in environmentally sensitive areas and Utilities& On-going CD PW consider social and environmental justice impacts. Infrastructure Site utility corridors within identified or designated transportation corridors and Utilities& 3.08.036 � On-going PW ensure that they connect to similar facilities in adjacent jurisdictions. Infrastructure Coordinate future placement of Idaho Power electrical transmission lines and Utilities& 3.08.03C substations in accordance with Eastern Treasure Valley Electric Plan. Infrastructure 0 On going CD PW 3.08.03D Encourage all electrical distribution utilities to be located underground. Utilities& On-going CD PW Infrastructure 3.09.01 Developand support markets or rec cled materials and roducts.AMIFfrtaistructure es& ® PW Legal,Mayo Office 3.09.01A Investigate opportunities with other jurisdictions and private refuse contractors for Utilities& Medium PW Legal new waste reduction and recycling markets. Infrastructure 3.09.016 Establish solid waste fees that encourage waste reduction and recycling. Utilities& Low PW Legal Infrastructure Develop and implement public education and outreach activities to raise awareness on Utilities& 3.09.01C waste reduction,reuse,recycling,and hazardous waste reduction. Infrastructure ® On going PW Mayor's Office 3.09.07 Fctnhlich rarurtinn/divarcinn and hn7nrdnnc wncto 4icnncn1 nnnlc_ PW 3.09.02A Maintain opportunities for proper disposal of target priority waste streams such as Utilities& On-going PW mercury,used oil,fluorescent lamps,used gas,and waste tires. Infrastructure 3.09.02E Work with local stakeholders to develop public education campaigns regarding the Utilities& ® On-going PW importance of and opportunities for the proper disposal of hazardous waste. Infrastructure 7= 3.09.03 Reinforce existing City recycling and procurement policies. Utilities& PW Finance Infrastructure Page 19 Page 52 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Responsible ... Lead 3.09.03A Partner with City's solid waste contractor to investigate conservation options including Utilities& ® Medium PW composting,recycling,and green waste. Infrastructure Maintain internal recycling and sustainability programs that procure specific recycled Utilities& 3.09.036 content and less hazardous materials. Infrastructure 0 On going PW Finance 4.00.00 Chapter 4 Livable ® a Community • • 7� • Increase appropriate partnershi in the community to provide progr Parks and CD,Finance, 4.01.01 Finance,P&R Legal,Mayor's activities to the community. _ Pathways Office 4.01.01A Explore additional partnership opportunities as well as build on existing partnerships Parks and On-going P&R CD, Finance with focus on low-service areas. Pathways Identify desired sports facilities or complexes and establish partnerships that foster Parks and Finance, 4.01.016 their development. Pathways High P&R Mayor's Office 4.01.01C Continue to explore partnerships with alternative providers,such as schools,to Parks and M On-going P&R CD,Legal increase level of service. Pathways 4.01.01D Evaluate impact fees for public open space to ensure development is paying the full Parks and On-going Finance P&R allowable fee. Pathways Parks and Finance,Legal, 4.01.02 Increase opportunities to fund programming,services,and facility improvements. Pathways m Finance,P&R P&R 4.01.02A Increase special event and activities sponsorships. Parks and On-going P&R Legal Pathways Pursue grant and philanthropic opportunities at the federal,state,regional,and local Parks and 4.01.026 � On-going P&R Finance levels. Pathways Implement a cost recovery and pricing policy to determine a consistent method of Parks and 4.01.02C pricing Parks and Recreation activities. Pathways Medium Finance P&R Explore feasibility of a dedicated funding source for parks and recreation through Parks and 4.01.02D Medium P&R Finance special revenue,sports,or other available sources. Pathways 4.01.02E Consider a process and policies for the acceptance of donated land and or money to Parks and Low P&R Finance,Legal be dedicated to public open space or facilities. Pathways 4.01.02F Explore the use of digital displays to show showcase and advertise City events near Parks and Low P&R Legal parks. Pathways Continue to improve organizational efficiencies and maintain existing quality Parks and 4.01.03 ards for pis and recreational amenities. Pathways A�� P&R Finance,HR Enhance and improve internal and external communication regarding recreation Parks and 4.01.03A activities and services using social media and mobile tools. Pathways On-going P&R IT Page 20 Page 53 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Res onsible ... Lead 4.01.03E Staff appropriately to meet demand and maintain established quality of service. Parks and M On-going P&R Finance Pathways 4.01.03C Expand and improve the volunteer program to meet growing needs. Parks and On-going P&R HR Pathways Provide for park acquisition and maintenance to meet projected city and i ii growth and demands. Pathways Finance,P&R Legal,Mayor's population Office CD,Finance, 4.02.01 Continue working toward the park land level of service goal of four acres/1,000 Parks and Finance,P&R Legal,Mayor's persons and a 0.5 miles service area radius from residences. Pathways � i� Office 4.02.01A Evaluate developer impact fee to align with Capital Improvement Plan(CIP)requests Parks and On-going Finance P&R and current park land level of service. Pathways 4.02.0113 Continue to find and purchase additional land for future park development where Parks and On-going P&R Finance level of service is below threshold. Pathways 4.02.01C Identify and require future park sites using information in the Meridian Parks and Parks and On-going P&R CD Recreation Master Plan and on the Future Land Use Map. Pathways 4.02.011) Parks and Finance,Legal, Look for opportunities to add parks and pathways in new growth areas. Pathways On going P&R Mayor's Office 4.02.01E Consider population/housing density and accessibility when acquiring future land for Parks and On-going P&R CD parks and recreation. Pathways 4.02.02 Provide a variety of park types(neighborhood parks,community parks,regional Parks and ■ P&R Finance, parks)with a diversity of uses and activities interspersed throughout the community. Pathways m A Mayor's Office Consider programming needs for all ages and abilities when adding new components Parks and to 4.02.02A to existing parks or when developing new parks. Pathways On-going P&R Finance 4.02.02B Continue to monitor recreational trends to stay current with programming and Parks and On-going P&R Mayor's Office demand. Pathways 4.02.02C Consider future operation and maintenance costs and work to minimize those costs Parks and On-going P&R Finance into the development of park while delivering a highly functional and quality park. Pathways 4.02.03 Monitor and evaluate the use,demands,and trends of recreation components. Parks and P&R Finance, Pathways Mayor's Office Implement and maintain the existing Capital Improvement Plan(CIP),Master Plan, Parks and Finance, 4.02.03A Comprehensive Parks and Recreation System Plan,and Life Cycle Replacement Pathways On-going P&R Mayor's Office Programs. Office4.03.00 Maintain and improve the user experience and awareness of recreational facilities, Parks and P&R CID,IT,Legal, amenities,and programs. Pathways Mayor's 4.03.01 Increase year round recreational programming and activities that encourage Parks and P&R CD,IT,Legal, education,health and wellness,community involvement,and multi-sensory play. Pathways © Mayor's Office Page 21 Page 54 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Res onsible ... Lead 4.03.01A Explore opportunities for additional indoor recreation space through partnerships, Parks and Very High P&R CD,Legal, agreements,and the construction of a new Community Center. Pathways Mayor's Office 4.03.01E Continue to look for opportunities to expand programs around working hours and Parks and M On-going P&R Mayor's Office commuting citizens. Pathways 4.03.01C Explore increasing the number of program opportunities for seniors,young adults, Parks and On-going P&R Mayor's Office teens,tweens,and people with special needs. Pathways Set targets,identify gaps,and deploy programs,activities,and events that provide Parks and IT,Mayor's 4.03.01D multigenerational recreational opportunities. Pathways On going P&R Office I 4.03.01E Support symbiotic uses of facilities through programs that encourage community Parks and On-going P&R Mayor's Office interactions. Pathways 4.03.02 Add destination park amenities that uniquely blend arts,entertainment,and culture. Parks andE. 300F P&R Finance, Pathways Mayor's Offic 4.03.02A Explore opportunities to add destination playground and natural play areas with Parks and to High P&R Finance, climbing features and multi-sensory play. Pathways Mayor's Office Foster development of discovery-oriented parks that uniquely blend arts, Parks and Finance, 4.03.02B entertainment,and culture. Pathways High P&R Mayor's Office Develop4.04.00 pathways. Pathways 4.04.01 Seamlessly connect local pathways with regionally significant pathways. Parks and P&R CD Pathways 4.04.01A Ensure that new development and subdivisions connect to the pathway system. Parks and Very High P&R CD Pathways 4.04.01E Provide options for passive recreational opportunities not typically supplied by parks Parks and Very High P&R CD and facilities,such as jogging,walking,and bicycling. Pathways 4.04.01C Establish and enhance regional pathway connections to the adjacent communities of Parks and Very High P&R CD Eagle,Nampa, Boise,Caldwell,and Kuna. Pathways 4.04.02 Link pathways to important pedestrian generators,environmental features,historic Parks and P&R CD landmarks,public facilities,Town Centers,and business districts. Pathways Identify opportunities for new paths that connect residential neighborhoods and 4.04.02A community facilities,such as the library and city hall,parks,schools,athletic facilities, Parks and M Very High P&R CD swimming pools,historic districts,the Downtown,as well as other commercial and Pathways retail activity centers in Meridian. Preserve existing public rights-of-way and other easements for future pathways and Parks and 4.04.02B accessways,particularly along powerline and utility corridors,railway corridors,and M Very High P&R CD waterway or irrigation corridors. Pathways 4.04.02C Continue partnerships with area irrigation districts to continue to expand pathway Parks and On-going P&R CD system along existing waterways. Pathways Page 22 Page 55 Item#5. Responsible • Policy Section Section SymbolsSupport Lead 4.04.03 Facilitate accessibility of pathway system for people of all abilities,pedestrians, Parks and P&R CD,FD,Mayor's bicyclists,and other non-motorized pathway users. Pathways Office,PD Through coordination with Pathway Plan updates,locate trailheads at or in Parks and 4.04.03A conjunction with park sites,schools,and other community facilities to increase local Pathways High P&R CD access to the pathway system and reduce duplication of supporting improvements. Furnish pathway systems with trailhead improvements that include interpretive and Parks and 4.04.03E directional signage systems,benches,drinking fountains,restrooms,parking and Pathways High P&R Mayor's Office staging areas,and other services for all ages and abilities. 4.04.03C Develop pathway design and development standards that are easy to maintain and Parks and High P&R FD,PD access by maintenance,security,and emergency vehicles. Pathways • CID,Finance, 00 is Office, 4.05.01 Protect and enhance existing waterways,groundwater,wetlands,wildlife habitat, Stewardship ® CD,P&R,PW CD air,soils,and other natural resources. 4.05.01A Identify waterways,wetlands,other natural resources,viewsheds,and natural Stewardship ® On-going PW CD features of topographic interest for preservation. Develop and implement programs to encourage and promote tree health and 4.05.0113 preservation throughout the City,including along waterways and within proposed Stewardship ® Medium P&R CD development. 4.05.01C Limit canal tiling and piping of creeks,sloughs,laterals,and drains to man-made Stewardship ® On-going CD facilities where public safety issues cannot be mitigated or are not of concern. 4.05.01D Improve and protect creeks and other natural waterways throughout commercial, Stewardship ® On-going CD industrial,and residential areas. 4.05.01E Assess environmental impact of potential new development,infill,and Stewardship ® On-going CD redevelopment. 4.05.01F Preserve,protect,and provide open space for recreation,conservation,and Stewardship On-going CD aesthetics. 4.05.01G Support a long-term transportation system that conforms to the public health Stewardship ® On-going CD standard for carbon monoxide attainment. 4.05.02 Protect Meridian's surface water quality. Stewardship ® CD,PW CD,Finance, Legal,P&R,PW Refine framework of environmental programs including construction,storm water 4.05.02A compliance,and floodplain management to satisfy the City's requirements under the Stewardship Medium PW Clean Water Act,FEMA,and the National Flood insurance program. 4.05.026 Provide incentives for developers to grant conservation easements along creek-side Stewardship ® Medium CD Finance,Legal, corridors. P&R,PW 4.05.02C Encourage the incorporation of creek corridors as amenities in development design. Stewardship ® On-going CD Page 23 Page 56 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Res onsible .. Lead 4.05.02D Identify and implement Low Impact Development(LID)in storm water drainage Stewardship El Low CD systems that are administered by the City of Meridian. 4.05.02E Develop and cultivate partnerships with local and regional stakeholders on public Stewardship to On-going CD education campaigns for water conservation and water quality. 4.05.02F Promote the increase of permeable areas through sound site design and use of Stewardship ® On-going PW CD materials that limit stormwater runoff. 4.05.03 preserve prime farmland within the Area of City Impact to maintain rural character Stewardship ® CD,Mayor's CD and provide opportunities for local produce and continued farming operations. Office 4.05.03A Encourage,as appropriate,the continued use of land for farming near Area of City Stewardship ® On-going CD Impact boundaries to effectively transition from rural uses to urban. Slow the outward progression of the City's limits by discouraging fringe area 4.05.0313 development;encourage development of vacant or underutilized parcels currently Stewardship ® High Mayor's Office CD within City limits. 4.05.03C Support appropriate agriculture operations within the Area of City Impact as a source Stewardship ® On-going Mayor's Office CD of locally grown food. 4.05.03D Consider public support for funding to preserve open space as part of permanent land Stewardship ® Very High CD Mayor's Office trust. and reduce air �. �� rove air ollution in the Meridian and Treasure Finance, All,FD Office 4.06.01 protect public health by reducing ozone,fine particulate matter and other Stewardship ® CD,PW, All,FD greenhouse gases and toxics in the air. Mayor's Office Coordinate with ACHD to improve traffic flow,minimize vehicle time spent idling and 4.06.01A accelerating,and reduce the number of single-occupancy vehicles. Stewardship ® On going CD Promote transportation choices,facilities,and alternatives such as car and van 4.06.016 pooling,public transit,alternative fleet vehicles,bicycle racks/storage and Stewardship ® On-going CD telecommuting. Partner with transportation agencies and large employers to promote public 4.06.01C awareness of air quality concerns and the need/benefits of making alternative Stewardship On-going CD transportation choices. 4.06.01D Research utilization/installation of Energy Management Systems in municipal buildings Stewardship ® Medium PW to track and cut energy costs for lighting and heating/cooling. 4.06.01E Convert appropriate municipal fleet vehicles to low-emission/alternative fuel vehicles Stewardship ® On-going PW All when feasible. 4.06.01F Participate with Ada County in publicizing burning bans when necessary. Stewardship ® On-going Mayor's Office FD Reduce energy consumption in municipal facilities and operations;provide CD,Finance, 4.07.00 leadership in promoting energy conservation throughout the City. Stewardship PW,CD Office, Page 24 Page 57 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Responsible .. Lead CD,Finance, 4.07.01 Provide City services in an environmentally sustainable and cost effective manner. Stewardship ® PW,CD Mayor's Office, PW 4.07.01A Investigate funding opportunities to finance City conservation programs and projects, Stewardship ® On-going PW Finance and retrofit Meridian public buildings to improve energy efficiency. 4.07.01E Support construction projects that demonstrate an innovative and effective approach Stewardship ® On-going PW CD to stormwater management and Low Impact Development. 4.07.01C Partner with other entities to expand opportunities for energy conservation outreach Stewardship ® On-going PW Mayor's Office and education,such as schools,utility providers,and other public places. Seek opportunities for public-private partnerships to develop and showcase 4.07.01D alternative electricity-generating facilities or to enhance the capacity and reliability of Stewardship ® On-going PW Mayor's Office renewable energy resources. 4.07.01E Build public facilities that utilize energy conservation technologies. Stewardship ® On-going PW Mayor's Office 4.07.01F Adopt and implement guidelines and standards for energy conservation practices. Stewardship ® Low PW 4.07.01G Partner with regional stakeholders to increase public awareness of the benefits of Stewardship ® On-going PW CD,Mayor's sustainable design and constructing high-performance built environments. Office 4.07.01H Collaborate with stakeholders to develop demonstration projects incorporating water Stewardship ® Low PW and energy conservation;and energy efficient construction methods and materials. Integrate new technologies and advancements in building science to promote a whole- building approach to sustainability.Recognize performance in five key areas of human 4.07.011 Stewardship ® On-going CD PW and environmental health:sustainable site development,water savings,energy efficiency,materials selection,and indoor environmental quality. 4.07.011 Identify funding sources and appropriate partners to stimulate energy efficient Stewardship ® On-going CD Finance,PW retrofits in existing housing stock. Responsibly4.08.00 stewardship and fiscal and environmental sustainability. 4.08.01 Protect public health and watersheds through adequate treatment and disposal of Stewardship ® PW Implement and maintain the Public Works Department's Sewer Master Plan and 4.08.01A Stewardship ® On-going PW Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility Plan. 4.08.02 Provide cost effective and environmentally sustainable wastewater service to citizens Stewardship ® PW CD and business. Eliminate existing private treatment and septic systems on properties annexed into 4.08.02A the City and instead connect users to the City wastewater system;discourage the Stewardship On-going PW CD prolonged use of private treatment septic systems for enclave properties. 00 Provide ample and clean water to the citizens of Meridian in perpetuity. Stewardship PW CID,Mayor's 4.09.01 Protect the quality of source water. Stewardship ® PW CD Page 25 Page 58 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Res onsible ,.. Lead Ensure that new development is connected to the City's sanitary sewer system(no 4.09.01A septic systems). Stewardship I ® On going PW CD 4.09.01B Develop a source water protection plan. Stewardship ® High PW CD 4.09. UZNL UJJULLqPW 4.09.02A Develop and implement a water supply master plan. Stewardship ® On-going PW 4.09.0213 Assess and provide new water sources. Stewardship ® On-going PW 4.09.03 Conserve existing water supplies. Stewardship ® PW,CD Mayor's Office, PW 4.09.03A Implement and maintain the Public Works Department Water Conservation Plan. Stewardship ® On-going PW Reduce reliance on City potable water for landscape irrigation purposes by educating 4.09.03B the public,encouraging the use of recycled water,and adoption of water conserving Stewardship ® On-going PW landscape guidelines. 4.09.03C Maintain a public outreach program on water conservation. Stewardship ® On-going PW Mayor's Office 4.09.03D Encourage the appropriate and attractive use of xeric,drought-tolerant plant species Stewardship ® On-going CD PW and non-plant materials that reduce landscape maintenance and water consumption. 4.10.00 Protect public health and safety by guiding growth and development away from Public Safety CD,PW CD,FD,Mayor's hazardous areas that pose a threat to people and property. Office,PD,PW 4.10.01 Reduce the threat of loss of life and property from hazards. Public Safety 0 CD,PW CD,FD,Mayor's Office,PD,PW 4.10.01A Plan for and allow land uses surrounding the Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility Public Safety Q Very High PW CD that reduce human exposure to odors. 4.10.0113 Require industrial uses to conform to disposal,spill,and storage measures as outlined Public Safety Q On-going PW CD,FD,PD by the Environmental Protection Agency. 4.10.01C Work with ITD and ACHD to ensure highways and roadways are designed to mitigate Public Safety Q On-going CD PD,FD natural hazards and are as safe as possible. 4.10.01D Work with Idaho Power to ensure that a National Interest Electric Transmission Public Safety Q On-going CD Mayor's Office Corridor does not traverse through Meridian. 4.10.01E Identify and protect areas below canals and laterals that could be damaged if the slope Public Safety Q On-going CD PW is compromised. 4.10.01F Identify target hazards based on commercial/industrial occupancy type. Public Safety Q On-going FD PD 4.10.01G Encourage the installation of residential fire sprinklers as part of a comprehensive fire Public Safety Q On-going FD CD safe community effort. 4.10.01H Develop lot grading,dust,and drainage standards for residential development to Public Safety Q Very High PW CD,Legal mitigate slope erosion and protect property. Create an environment in which the people of Meridian feel safe by providing CD,Clerk's,FD, 00 effective fire,police,and other emergency response services. + Off ice, Page 26 Page 59 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Responsible .. Lead Ensure the capability to direct,control,and coordinate emergency response and CD,Mayor's 4.11.01 recovery operations. 11LIC Public Safety FD,PD Office Coordinate with emergency service providers on proposed annexation and 4.11.01A development requests,and the reporting of impacts on services through Public Safety 13 On-going FD,PD comprehensive analysis and adopted standards. 4.11.0113 Assess and compare response times to adopted standards for identification of Public Safety C3 On-going FD,PD CD, Mayor's additional needed resources. Office 4.11.01C Identify future and current fire and police station locations based on adopted service public Safety 13 On-going FD,PD level standards and goals. Prioritize the location of future fire and police stations on collectors to eliminate 4.11.01D Public Safety Q On going FD,PD access issues on arterials. 4.11.01E Communicate with staff,elected and appointed officials on impacts from development public Safety 13 On-going FD,PD CD, Mayor's to adopted Police and Fire Department response time standards and goals. Office 4.11.01F Based on Police Allocation Model(PAM),ensure adequate Police staff and resources public Safety Q On-going PD to respond to growth and development. 4.11.02 ction through environmental design,sharing Public Safety PD,FD resources and information with other cities,and citizen assistance. 4.11.02A Develop programs,in partnership with allied agency responders,which focus on Public Safety Q On-going FD,PD preventative emergency medical services risk reduction. 4.11.02E Coordinate Fire and Police Department planning,training,and response efforts with Public Safety Q On-going FD,PD neighboring jurisdictions. 4.11.02C Coordinate with Meridian Rural Fire Protection District as growth occurs in the Area of public Safety On-going FD City Impact. 4.11.02D Help educate and curtail the rate of drug,alcohol,tobacco and other substance use. Public Safety 0 On-going PD 4.11.02E Work with public and private development and management groups to promote and Public Safety 0 On-going PD implement Crime Prevention through Environmental Design(CPTED)strategies. Enhance crime prevention awareness through the education of neighborhood watch 4.11.02F groups,multi-family property management companies,homeowners'associations, Public Safety Q On-going PD and other organizations. Utilize the crime analysis unit to identify ongoing crime trends utilizing statistical 4.11.02G analysis,heat maps,and other tools to more effectively and effectively deploy police Public Safety Q On-going PD resources. rl. 33 Ensure that quality Me Una emergency medical servii public Safety FD CD,Clerk's, provided within Meridian. P&R,PD Maintain and enforce construction standards,and adopt fire protection codes that are 4.11.03A consistent with International Fire Code standards. Public Safety 0 On-going FD CD 4.11.03E Develop contingency plans for special events to ensure adequate fire and emergency public Safety Q FD Clerk's, P&R, PD medical services. ME" Page 27 Page 60 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Responsible .. Lead Provide quality police services for public health,safety,and welfare throughout the 4.11.04 Public Safety Clerk's,FD,P&R community. 4.11.04A Develop contingency plans for special events to ensure adequate police protection. Public Safety 13 On-going PD Clerk's,FD,P&R 4.11.04B Support and cooperate with federal,state,and local public safety agencies. Public Safety Q On-going PD Consider police protection and enforcement issues as part of the development review 4.11.04C process and as part of mobile sales,vehicle immobilization,and alcohol permitting and Public Safety Q On-going PD L licensing processes.+ 4.11.04D Continue coordinating with the Idaho Humane Society to ensure delivery of services. Public Safety Q On-going PD 5.00.00 Chapter 5 Vibrant e © m Community Character, 5.01.01 Encourage the safety,health,and well-being of the community. Design,and a CD P&R,PD 1- 2-Character, 5.01.01A Foster a walkable and bikeable community through good site and street design. Design,and a On-going CD Identity Provide pathways,crosswalks,traffic signals and other improvements that encourage Character, 5.01.016 Design,and e On-going CD P&R safe,physical activity for pedestrians and bicyclists. Identity Provide,partner,and preserve public and private indoor and outdoor recreation Character, 5.01.01C Design,and a On-going CD amenities for a diverse range of physical activities. Identity Plan for and encourage neighborhoods that provide reasonable pedestrian and bicycle Character, 5.01.01D access to services like healthcare,daycare,grocery stores,and recreational areas. Design,and a On-going CD Identity Promote best management practices to control the spread of noxious weeds,in Character, 5.01.01E conjunction with Ada County Weed and Pest Control and City Code Enforcement. Design,and e On-going CD PD Identity Minimize noise,lighting,and odor disturbances from commercial developments to Character, 5.01.01E Design,and e On-going CD residential dwellings by enforcing city code. Identity Ensure developments employ proper water drainage techniques to eliminate the risks Character, 5.01.01G of water contamination,mold,and pests. Design,and e On-going CD Identity Page 28 Page 61 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Responsible ... Lead Support beautiful and high quality development that reinforces neighborhood Character, 5.01.02 character and sustainability. Design,and Identity 5.01.02A Maintain and implement community design ordinances,quality design criteria,and Character, Design,and e High CD complete street policies to set quality standards citywides. Identity Character, 5.01.02E Coordinate with ITD regarding interstate beautification and appropriate signage. Design,and e On-going CD Identity Promote area beautification and community identity through context sensitive Character, 5.01.02C building and site design principles,appropriate si na e,and attractive landscaping. Design,and On-going CD Identity Require appropriate building design,and landscaping elements to buffer,screen, Character, 5.01.02D beautify,and integrate commercial,multifamily,and parking lots into existing Design,and e On-going CD neighborhoods. Identity Character, 5.01.02E Support and protect the identity of existing residential neighborhoods. Design,and e On-going CD Identity 5.01.02E Explore development and implementation of architectural and/or landscape standards Character, Design,and 8 High CD for geographic areas of the City. Identity Require attractive landscaping and pedestrian friendly design within new Character, 5.01.02G developments. Design,and a On-going Identity Require the improvement and maintenance of landscaping along public rights-of-way Character, 5.01.02H and landscaping of dedicated but unimproved rights-of-way strips. Design,and a On-going CD Identity Character, 5.01.03 Strengthen community pride and identity. Design,and a CD,Mayor's FD,PW Identity Office,PD Ir Continue supporting community-betterment activities,such as"Rake Up Meridian," Character, 5.01.03A and implementing new or old programs to support residents in need of help for Design,and a On-going Mayor's Office property cleanup and repair. Identity Work with residents and homeowners associations to maintain and take pride in their Character, 5.01.03E common areas and landscaping along public rights of way and other areas visible to Design,and e On-going Mayor's Office the public. Identity Page 29 Page 62 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Res onsible _ Support Review and implement design guidelines for properties along entryway corridors and Character, , 5.01.03C gateways to promote aesthetic features and clearly identify the community. Design,and a Medium CD Identity Continue property maintenance programs to remove junk vehicles,abate weed Character, 5.01.03D nuisances,and eliminate trash build up. Design,and 8 On-going PD FD Identity Implement the Welcome to Meridian Signage Plan by budgeting for construction and Character, 5.01.03E maintenance of signs at key locations throughout the City;look for partnership Design,and e On-going CD PW opportunities with property owners and developers. Identity Encourage volunteerism within the community,City Hall,and City Boards and Character, 5.01.03E Commissions. Design,and e On-going Mayor's Office Identity 5.02.00 Celebrate . historical, Historic P&R CID,Finance, pup OfficePreservation Mayor's 5.02.01 Enhance and restore the historical quality of Old Town. r F N QP&R CD 5.02.01A Maintain and implement design and building standards for historically significant Historic a Medium P&R CD buildings and resources in Old Town. Preservation Support owners of historic buildings in their efforts to restore and/or preserve their Historic 5.02.016 Q On-going P&R CD properties. Preservation P&R CD,Finance Coordinate with the Meridian Historic Preservation Commission to recommend use, Historic 5.02.02A M3 On-going P&R CD restoration,and preservation of historical structures and sites throughout Meridian. Preservation 5.02.02E Investigate and promote incentive programs for historic properties. Historic Q On-going P&R Finance Preservation Implement tools and undertake programs that will increase the community's Historic 5.02.02C awareness of its heritage as well as the economic and aesthetic value of historic Preservation Low P&R Mayor's Office preservation. 5.02.02D Stimulate private and public investment in the restoration and preservation of historic Historic Q On-going P&R CD, Finance buildings,outdoor spaces,and natural historical features. Preservation Support the efforts of the Historic Preservation Commission to foster preservation and Historic 5.02.02E Q On-going P&R Mayor's Office conservation. Preservation When appropriate,seek comments and approval from the Historic Preservation Historic 5.02.02F Commission prior to any changes to City-owned or controlled property,including Q On-going P&R CD buildings,outdoor spaces,and natural features. Preservation 5.02.02G Place informational plaques on historic structures and special sites. Historic On-going P&R Mayor's Office Preservation Page 30 Page 63 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Res onsible ... Lead Incorporate,into the development review process,a way to determine any impact on Historic 5.02.02H unique geological,historical,and archeological sites;preserve and protect as Preservation On-going P&R CD appropriate. 5.02.021 Encourage events and activities that celebrate the cultural heritage of Meridian. Historic Q On-going P&R Mayor's Office Preservation 5.02.02J Develop policies to preserve and protect or document and memorialize historic and Historic a On-going P&R Mayor's Office culturally significance structures and sites. Preservation Office5.03.00 Create opportunities for all Meridian residents and visitors to experience public art. Arts and Culture P&R CD,Legal 5.03.01 Support art throughout the community. Arts and Culture P&R CD,Legal, Mayor's Office 5.03.01A Exhibit both permanent and rotating works of art in City Hall and other public places. Arts and Culture m On-going P&R Legal, Mayor's Office 5.03.0113 Encourage the integration of public art as an integrated component with new Arts and Culture On-going P&R CD development. 5.03.01C Consider a central Art and Cultural District to showcase a wide variety of cultural Arts and Culture m Low P&R Mayor's Office offerings. 5.03.01D Provide local artists with opportunities to showcase their work. Arts and Culture On-going P&R Mayor's Office 5.03.01E Determine and respond to the community's art and cultural facility needs. Arts and Culture m On-going P&R Mayor's Office mr Raise awareness and promote existing arts offerings and artwork within the egal,May 5.03.02 Arts and Culture m P&R WOffice 5.03.02A Utilize the Meridian Art in Public Spaces program to raise awareness and appreciation Arts and Culture m On-going P&R Mayor's Office of the arts. Partner with the Ada County Highway District(ACHD)to create and install artwork on Legal,Mayor's 5.03.0213 traffic boxes,within roundabouts,and as part of other roadway improvement projects Arts and Culture m On-going P&R Office as appropriate. Office,P&R,Mayor's Mayor's 00 Supportt1 Office 5.04.01 Provide a diversity of education and art experiences for all residents Arts and Culture P&R,Mayor's Mayor's Office, Office ._ P&R � 5.04.01A Develop and offer youth art opportunities in partnership with the School District and Arts and Culture m On-going P&R Mayor's Office afterschool programs. 5.04.016 Strengthen partnerships with community organizations,schools,and institutions to Arts and Culture On-going P&R Mayor's Office support and encourage arts programs and education for adults and seniors. 5.04.01C Sponsor a variety of musical and performing arts in partnership with community Arts and Culture On-going Mayor's Office P&R organizations. Page 31 Page 64 Item#5. Responsible • Symbols Policy Section Section ,.. Lead Identify opportunities to partner with existing organizations and businesses to make 5.04.01D Arts and Culture On going P&R Mayor's Office their facilities available for civic and cultural purposes. 5.04.01E Engage with and support the full diversity of the community in the planning for arts Arts and Culture m On-going P&R Mayor's Office and culture facilities,programs,and events. 6.00.00 Chapter 6 Connected Community =Finance, Transportation 6.01.01 Support multi-modal and complete-street transportation improvement and Streets ® CD,P&R Mayor's Office, P&R,PW Work with the Union Pacific Railroad,Watco Companies and other interested Transportation 6.01.01A stakeholders to preserve and protect the existing Boise Cut-off rail corridor as a multi- and Streets High CD PW use corridor,including freight. Support Valley Regional Transit's(VRT)efforts to construct multi-modal transit centers Transportation 6.01.01E in areas of high commercial activity and employment as well as areas with transit- and Streets On-going CD PW supportive residential densities. Improve ingress and egress opportunities for all modes of transportation in Transportation 6.01.01C � On-going CD Downtown. and Streets 6.01.01D Pursue construction of the City's pathways network. Transportation ® Very High P&R Finance, and Streets Mayor's Office 6.01.01E Pursue bicycle routes/lanes/paths on roadways that will be appropriate for a wide Transportation ® On-going CD range of ages and abilities. and Streets Work with transportation providers to implement transportation plans,projects,and Transportation 6.01.01E � On-going CD PW studies. and Streets 6.01.01G Develop criteria for plan review in determining whether a development proposal is Transportation ® High CD safe,accessible,and comfortable for pedestrians and cyclists. and Streets Require pedestrian access connectors in all new development to link subdivisions Transportation 6.01.01H together and to promote neighborhood connectivity as part of a community pathway and Streets El On-going CD P&R system. 6.01.011 Work with Ada County Highway District(ACHD)to identify gaps in the sidewalk system Transportation 0 On-going CD PW and pursue sidewalk construction for existing substandard streets. and Streets 6.01.011 Encourage new development to include buffered sidewalks,a sidewalk separated from Transportation 0 On-going CD the motor vehicle lane by a planter strip,especially on collector and arterial roadways. and Streets 6.01.02 Enhance existing transportation systems. Transportation ® PW and Streets Page 32 Page 65 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Responsible ... Lead 6.01.02A Work with transportation partners to include Meridian's highest priority Transportation El On-going CD PW transportation projects within their plans and budgets. and Streets Reduce the number of existing access points onto arterial streets by using methods Transportation 6.01.02E such as cross-access agreements,access management,and frontage/backage roads, 0 On-going CD PW and promoting local and collector street connectivity. and Streets Require new development to establish street connections to existing local roads and Transportation El 6.01.02C collectors as well as to underdeveloped adjacent properties. and Streets On going CD Consider needed sidewalk,pathway,landscaping,and lighting improvements with all Transportation 6.01.02D Q On-going CD PW land use decisions. and Streets 6.01.02E Consider incomplete and underserved roadways and timing of necessary roadway Transportation Q On-going CD improvements in all land use decisions. and Streets Improve coordination with ACHD,ITD,VRT,COMPASS,and developers in addressing transportation issues and needs before public hearings,including having school and Transportation El 6.01.02E transportation agency comments in with adequate time to allow for review by the City and Streets On going CD PW before a decision is made on a land-use application. 6.01.02G Work with the Transportation Commission and transportation partners to implement Transportation El On-going CD needed neighborhood traffic calming and address safety concerns. and Streets Work with transportation partners to establish and implement a system of 6.01.02H performance measures to gauge whether transportation goals and objectives are Transportation ® On-going CD being realized. and Streets 6.01.021 Pursue the extension of Idaho Ave.and/or Broadway Ave.to Commercial Dr.and the Transportation ® On-going CD ' extension of East 3rd St.from Fairview Ave.to Pine Ave.in Downtown. and Streets 6.01.02J Pursue the extension of Overland Road into Canyon County,consistent with the 2011 Transportation ® On-going CD Airport-Overland Corridor Study. and Streets Pursue the expansion of US 20/26;the development of an overpass of 1-84 at Linder Transportation 6.01.02K Road;the extension of SH-16 from US 20/26 to I-84;and SH-55 and SH-69 corridor and Streets El On-going CD improvements. 6.01.02L Work with ACHD to implement projects from the 2012 Downtown Meridian Transportation ® On-going CD Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan. and Streets Work with transportation agencies and private property owners to preserve 6.01.02M transportation corridors,future transit routes and infrastructure,road,and highway Transportation El On-goinglrmqm extensions,and to facilitate access management. and Streets Coordinate with ACHD to more carefully examine the appropriateness of roundabouts Transportation 6.01.02N with intersection improvements in relation to pedestrians and other users. and Streets 0 On-going CD PW 6.01.03 Provide the most efficient transportation network possible I ransportatio ff p p 'nud_ Streets 6.01.03A Work with ITD and ACHD to establish truck routes and design routes appropriately for Transportation El On-going CD their contexts. and Streets Page 33 Page 66 Item#5. SymbolsID Policy Section Section Responsible ... Lead 6.01.0313 Require collectors consistent with the ACHD Master Street Map(MSM),generally Transportation ® On-going CD at/near the mid-mile location within the Area of City Impact. and Streets Require the public street system to be continuous through each mile section,avoiding Transportation 6.01.03C Q On-going CD long,straight stretches. and Streets 6.01.03D Consider ACHD's Master Street Map(MSM),Complete Streets Policy and the Transportation El On-going CD Transportation and Land Use Integration Plan in all land use decisions. and Streets 6.01.03E Participate in the development of the Regional Transportation Plan(CIM 2.0)and Transportation On-going CD PW Transportation Improvement Program(TIP). and Streets 06 Encourage new and alternative transportation Transportation C CD,Mayor's chnology and lifestyles. and Streets Office,P&R Support efforts to evaluate and plan for future transportation services such as public Transportation 6.01.04A transit,on-demand services,autonomous and shared vehicles. and Streets On going CD 6.01.0413 Develop and implement agreements with irrigation districts and the Union Pacific Transportation Q Medium P&R CD, Mayor's Railroad to allow for bike/pedestrian pathways. and Streets Office 6.01.04C Work with transportation partners to identify and promote strategies for reducing Transportation ® Low CD reliance on the single-occupant automobile. and Streets 6.01.04D Work with COMPASS and VRT to expand public transportation in Meridian. Transportation On-going CD and Streets Integrate new technologies(e.g.,connected and automated vehicle technology,micro- Transportation 6.01.04E mobility options)to increase efficiency,safety,and opportunities of transportation and Streets On-going CD users. 6.01.04F Consider and mitigate undesired impacts of emerging transportation and delivery Transportation On-going CD technologies. and Streets Work with transportation partners to identify locations for future park&ride lots, Transportation 6.01.05 — _ ® CD PW shuttle buses,and/or transit stations, and Streets In coordination with VRT and COMPASS,explore grants and other funding 6.01.05A opportunities to provide incentives for developers to locate public transit Transportation ® On-going CD infrastructure within areas planned for transit. and Streets 6.01.0513 Transportation Work with VRT in developing design guidelines for transit stations. and Streets El On going CD Support alternative public and private sector funding opportunities for transportation Transportation 6.01.05C Q On-going CD PW investment. and Streets Page 34 Page 67 Item#5. VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS All City Departments with identified roles were coordinated with on these priorities. Prioritization and roles were done by consensus over the course of two months,with Planning coordinating any role or timing conflicts prior to submitting the application. There are a few areas where Departments have requested language improvements. For example,to break-up policies with multiple ideas onto several distinct policies. Planning will carry these text changes forward in the next update,most likely in 2021,when the Plan is not so new. IX. FINDINGS A. Required Findings from the Unified Development Code 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the other elements of the comprehensive plan. The Commission finds the proposed amendment is it consistent with other elements of the Plan. It is described as a next step in the adopted Plan and required to implement it. 2. The proposed amendment provides an improved guide to future growth and development of the city. The Commission finds the proposed amendment is an improved guide for future development. The amendment helps to prioritize implementation of the Plan and improves it's transparency. 3. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Commission finds the proposed amendment is internally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It is a required step to implement the plan, and required to implement policy 3.04.01E. 4. The proposed amendment is consistent with this Unified Development Code. The Commission finds the proposed amendment is consistent with the Unified Development Code (UDC). The amendment provides further guidance on implementation for work to maintain the UDC. 5. The amendment will be compatible with existing and planned surrounding land uses. The Commission finds he the amendment is compatible with existing and planned surrounding land uses. The amendment does not mods the text or map of the adopted Plan except to prioritize implementation efforts. 6. The proposed amendment will not burden existing and planned service capabilities. The Commission finds that the proposed amendment will not burden existing and planned service capabilities. The amendment will help to prioritize work to ensure continuity of service planning. 7. The proposed map amendment(as applicable)provides a logical juxtaposition of uses that allows sufficient area to mitigate any anticipated impact associated with the development of the area. Not applicable. The proposed amendment does not revise the map or land use descriptions. 8. The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the City of Meridian. The Commission finds the proposed amendment is in the best interest of the City. Prioritization and assignment ofpolicies will improve the effectiveness of the Plan. Page 35 Page 68 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Community Development: Presentation of Ada County Highway District's Draft 2021-2025 Integrated Five-Year Work Plan Page 69 Item#6. C� fIEN , IN4, IDAHG-. MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Caleb Hood, Community Development Meeting Date: August 18, 2020 Presenter: Caleb Hood Estimated Time: 15 minutes Topic: ACHD DRAFT 2021-2025 Integrated Five-Year Work Plan Recommended Action: Review Draft IFYWP (attached) and provide any applicable comments to Staff. The ACHD comment period closes August 21St. Background: Earlier this year, the City sent to ACHD our roadway, intersection and Community Program priority requests to be considered in the drafting of the 2021-2025 Integrated Five-Year Work Plan (IFYWP).ACHD recently released the initial draft of the 2021-2025 IFYWP (attached) and is seeking any feedback the City may have. Further,ACHD has responded to the City's priority requests and provided an updated spreadsheet with the status of each project (attached). Staff has reviewed the draft IFYWP and discussed with the Transportation Commission (TC) on August 3rd. Besides an interim signal at McMillan/Black Cat being accelerated to 2022, there is really no change from the currently adopted IFYWP as it relates to Meridian. Staff asked for feedback from the TC on the overall IFYWP, but in particular the concept to request ACHD move down projects on Ten Mile Road, south of 1-84 in their program. The projects along south Ten Mile for Meridian help begin to meet larger needs but there may be higher priority and higher value projects within Meridian that provide greater value to the community if the Ten Mile projects were dropped or reprioritized lower on ACHD's plan. Currently there are two projects on Ten Mile that meet this criteria: 1) Ten Mile, Victory to Overland which is currently the City's #6 highest priority and planned for construction in 2022/23; and 2) Ten Mile/Victory intersection which is the City's #17 highest priority and also planned for construction in 2022/23. The TC had no comments or recommendations to the City Council or ACHD on the initial draft of the IFYWP. Attachments (3) Page 70 Item#6. 100 Mary May,President Kent Goldthorpe,Vice-President Rebecca W.Arnold,Commissioner Sara M. Baker,Commissioner /f4� /�O SULvtGt� Jim D. Hansen,Commissioner July 21, 2020 The Honorable Mayor Simison Mayor—City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Mayor Simison, Thank you for taking the time to submit transportation requests for the ACHD Integrated Five-Year Work Plan (IFYWP)for fiscal years 2021-2025. As the City of Meridian is a key partner agency and stakeholder in many ACHD efforts,your participation in the IFYWP process is very important to the ACHD Commission to ensure a collaborative plan that efficiently targets Ada County taxpayer resources. Attached you will find the initial draft of the FY2021-2025 update. We are seeking comments on this draft update through August 21, 2020 and would greatly appreciate any input received from the City on the draft plan by that date. In the meantime, if you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact Kristy Inselman (208-387-6252, kinselman@achdidaho.org). VEe ctfully, .Wong, Directo ADA COU AY DISTRICT CC: Kristy Inselman,ACHD; Caleb H Meridian Attachments: FY2021-2025 IFYWP Initial Draft Ada County Highway District•3775 Adams Street•Garden City,ID•83714•PH 208 387-6100•FX 345-7650• www.achdidaho.or Page 71 Item#6. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT - ptiM 44 Y - �.g T- s _ EQrtI+ • 1 , 1 • WORK PLAN INITIAL DRAFT Page 72 Item#6. All data in this report reflects work completed or under construction as of September 30, 2020. Page 73 Item#6. THE IFYWP ACHD"S VISION Leading Transportation Innovation — Investing in Communities INTROL.... LION City + County:!Fr^n The 2021-2025 Integrated Five- Comprehensive Year Work Program (IFYWP) Establish the Land Use Vision sets forth the strategies, projects and priorities which the Ada County Highway District (ACHD) will pursue over Communities in Motion the next five years. The first Demographic Projections+Travel Demand two years of the Plan align with Model ACH D's 2021 Budget, - scheduled for adoption on August 26, 2020. The remaining ACHD Strategic Plan years set the focus for ACHD's AllocationAsset Management+ Resource efforts for future budget years. The document allows elected - officials, staff, partner agencies, and the public to work in a ------ coordinated fashion to implement projects. The Integrated Five-Year Work 01% Capital Asset ADA Plan Bike Master Neighborhood Improvement Plan works in support of Management Plan Plans Plan various ACHD and partner agency foundational planning -- Project Identification+Implementation Strategy —�----------- documents and is the - implementing arm for these plans. The figure to the right qr ACHD Integrated illustrates how the IFYWP fits Budget into the region's overall Program of Projects planning framework. Page 74 Item#6. off-, � OCUSED INVESTMENT IMPLEMENTING THE STRATEGIC PLAN ACHD established its vision, mission, and priorities in 2011, with the intent of ensuring that all ACHD activities are focused on the best interest of the citizens we serve. The bottom line is that every choice ACHD makes must help to effectively and efficiently accomplish ACHD's Vision, Mission and Priorities. In June 2016, the ACHD Commission adopted a Strategic Plan to further clarify the intent of its vision, mission, and priorities. The Plan included a resource allocation methodology that informs and guides development of the IFYWP. That methodology, further revised in 2019, guides the programming and project selection decisions for the IFYWP. REVENUE ALLOCATION METHODOLOGY MEET ACHD'S PROGRAMMING OBLIGATIONS Ensure compliance with applicable federal laws (Americans with Disabilities Act& Environmental Regulations) 00: Vehicle Registration Fee commitments—Safe routes to school : congestion relief FOCUSMatch Impact Fee collections with required general funds PRIMARY CapitalSignals, Crossings, and Safety Projects with documented needs Asset Management— ••es (Minor& Majoravailable) • DAFOCUS Neighborhood Plan & Bike Master Plan projects not funded by VRF Non-impact Fee Eligible Capital Improvement Plan Projects Page 75 Item#6. BA ANCED TRANSPORTATION SYST E M INTRODUCTION In determining the scope of each project listed within the IFYWP, ACHD seeks to implement its Complete Streets Policy and meet the needs of all users within the project limits in order to take the most advantage of work going on in an area. In January 2020, ACHD released its first IFYWP Annual Report. This report accounts for the progress being made in building a complete transportation network for all users in the County. The 2020 report can be found at https://bit.IV/38i5VJD. Metrics shown in this IFYWP are updated to reflect progress that will be made through this draft IFYWP. DID YOU KNOW 1 r ACHD has plans to continue to ensure safe 1 r and accessible movement of all people in r Ada County. PEOPLE WHO AL PEOPLE WHO BIKE 00 _ • PEOPL F ALL ABILITI PEOPLE L TOGE I HER ProgramsCapital Improvement Plan Community ACHD'S COMPLETE STREETS GUIDING PRINCIPLE Streets, bridges and transit stops within Ada County should be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so that pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, motorists, and people of all ages and abilities can travel safely and independF-�'•- (ACHD Policy Manual Section 3110.2) Item#6. BUILDING OUT YOUR MAJOR ROADS ACH D SERVES 9°° PROGRAMMED Total Planned Lane Miles YOUWHEN +3% trom Annual Report YOU DRIVE DID YOU KNOW COMPLETE ACHD's Master Street Map % Total Planned Lane Miles +1%from Annual Report shows the how many lanes every arterial in the county will have when fully built out. To MANAGING THE learn more visit CONGESTION YOU FAC F https://bit.IV/2RSeNzl. PROGRAMMED IFYWP Projects to Address • , CORRIDOR Congested Locations PRI +rs Projects trom Annual Keport COMPLETION In an effort to implement - UNFUNDED in a logical manner,Commission has adopted a Projects Needed to Address Congested series of priority corridors. Locations Due to Lack of Funding - completed -4 Projects from Annual Report priority corridors. PROJECT PROGRAMMING LC loverdale, Overland Chinden New Projects in the 2021-2025 23 IFYWP Completed or Under Construction in 29 FY2020 Ten Mile, Over la Chinden Page 77 LItem o6. PING THE RIGHT BIKE FACILITIES FOR YOU LEVELS • • ACHD SERVES (i) (:i (:i YOU WHEN Includes Buffered or Protected/Raised YOU BIKE Includes Low- Standard Bike Lanes, Stress Bikeways Bike Lanes,Cycle Shoulder Bikeways Tracks, Multi-Use n 1 D vn U KNOW Paths 6 U I LT MILES ■Programmed Future About 7.5% of the cost of 180 +2 Complete road and intersection +13Programmed widening projects is spent on 175 +5Complete designing, buying right-of- 147 +1 Complete way, and constructing bike 239 � facilities. That equals over 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% $16 million in investment between 2021-2025. INCREASING ACCESS WITH A MMMENw- LOW-STRESS NETWORK BUILDING 6% NETWORK G 9% This IFYWP includes the addition Population within% ' milliondedicated 27% LJJ ' Y - mile of a complete - ' - projects. H N 3 : low-stress bikeway addition • -• LJJ0 > Y J 3zm • projects •• t that hose3 W oii a. o > _ will be completed with other Y a o 2 0 3 0� 40% . • projects, • • - 00 z 3 � Y L C N • projects • 90.5 miles `J � a V 00 * Population within Q ? o mile of a complete of connected o *1 or programmed cou 4- + low-stress bikeway O ° a New or enhanced R crossings built in BIKEWAY 232020 Page 78 *All miles shown are centerline miles, not total lanes miles. ,tem#6. BUILDING SIDEWALKS WHERE YOU WANT THEM PF BUILT MILES ■Programmed Future A C H D SERVES 176 180 +6 Completed Arterials +6 Programmed Collectors 157 ' 102 +1 Completed YOU WHEN +1 Programmed Locals 1,169 0 YOUWALK 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% nID Y"II I K 1\1( 'W FILLING KEY GAPS IN THE Community Programs is what SIDEWALK NETWORK ACHD calls pedestrian and bike projects. The draft IFYWP includes +3 from Annual Report 26 PROGRAMMED $52 million for these projects for .,^,. Miles of Gaps 2021-2025, over and above the sidewalks, crossings, and other improvements made with road and intersection projects. 7Miles COMPLETED TOTAL77 of Gaps Miles of Gaps +7 from Annual Report ACHD IS • , ^ *All miles shown are centerline miles, not sidewalk miles. TO SAFE ROUTESTO IMPROVING YOUR ACCESS TO SCHOOLAND TO WHERE YOU WANT TO GO EVERYWHERE ELSE Since - voters approved . vehicle POPULATION WITHIN A 1 MILE WALK registration fee increase in 00' OF KEY DESTINATIONS portionwith the promise a those funds would go to safe routes to schools ACHD has built 136 Ann from Annual Report projects . . _ safety for -1 ,7 school.children who walk to Schools Parks keepingis • to the % voters. But these are not the only r - . .. 35-/0, 36.5��0 pedestrian safety. In that same time, ACHID has actually completed +0.5%from a total of 254 Community Programs , Annual Report Page 7 Bus Stops g9 *All miles shown are centerline miles, not sidewalk miles. Item#6. OVING PEDESTRIAN RAMP ACCESSIBILITY STATUS MEDIUM--I= • Identified 1,273 696 7,608 ACHD SERVES 171 88 223 Complete* +47 +147 ALL PEOPLE 257 59 344 Programmed -11 -26 845 549 7,041 DID YOU V N O W -36 -121 Count of Ramps The ACHD Commission has directed ACHD Staff to IMPROVING SIDEWALK complete an inventory of ACCESSIBILITY diagonal curb ramps and pedestrian push buttons to review their level of MEDIUM = STATUS accessibility. This project is underway and will be 58.6 224.8 766.E Identified completed in October 2020. 0.4 5.1 2.9 • • +0.1 +2.4 +1.2 lete* NNW 4.9 10.2 14.4 For SAFE SIDEWALKS ARE +1.2 111h, Programmed. 53.2 209.5 749.3 .CHD's Safe Sidewalk Program dedicates $1.6 millionper year of Sidewalk to improve the accessibilityof *Additionally ACHD has 17,031 ramps and 1,595.1 miles of sidewalk where no sidewalksexisting • - ut deficiencies were identified through its ADA Transition Plan inventory process. Ada County. program • minorfills • - . • PROVIDING ACCESSIBLE possible. Locations� PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS © . • been ct COMPLETED 163 •Americans • input© Intersections with APS • • • • +25 fron aal Report •' disrepair or somethingmi • Annual RPnnrt A inaccessible, Intersections with APS 91 • about Page 80 PROGRAMMED r®GHBORHOOD WHERE YOU LIVE - NW OISE ACH D'S MISSION CITY IF, GARDEN - BOISE We drive quality transportation DWTN for all Ada County — Anytime, •- Anywhere! �6EAST END SOUTH Ilk` BARBER MERIDIAN Sw VALLEY .. Boise Central _ 2022 Bench + Barber • Kuna +South Valley KUNA Meridian ILCompleted Planning Areas Garden City+ North Meridian ■ Upcoming Planning Areas Eagle + Boise North (VMP/WWP) DID YOU KNOW Boise Southwest + Star ACHD has 16 neighborhood planning areas. While ACHD's Neighborhood Plans Boise East End look primarily at bike and pedestrian projects, these areas provide opportunity Boise North to look at the transportation system at a smaller scale for all modes. Boise Northwest 290 COMPLETE 0Neighborhood Plan Projects Boise West Bench + Boise Downtown + Boise Central Bench + Boise Southeast PROGRAMMED 150 Neighborhood Plan Projects Meridian Downtown + 4a� Kuna Downtown 2012 Corridor 912Neighnborhood Pla Item#6. BARBFR VALLI FUTURE PLANNING AREA - PLAN PROPOSED FOR 2022 PROJECTPROPOSED PROJECTS lip PROJECT YEAR Cul-de-Sac Reconstruct(2024)-HB312 Project Maintenance 2024 Cul-de-Sac Repair(2024)- HB312 Project Maintenance 2024 Federal Aid Capital Maintenance(2021)-Phase 2 • Warm Springs Ave,Starcrest Dr/Starview Dr Maintenance 2021 • Warm Springs Ave,Glacier Dr/SH 21 Maintenance Crack Seal(2022)-HB312 Project Maintenance 2022 BARBER VALLEY Page 82 Item#6. BOISE CENTRAL BENCH PLAN ADOPTED IN 2012 - NEXT UPDATE 2022 Annett St, Malad St/Targee St Community Future Bikeway Signage(2021)—Phase 1 • Canal St Bikeway,Vista Ave/Federal Way Community 2021 • Columbus St Bikeway,Canal St/Kootenai St • Latah St Bikeway,Targee St/Emerald St Cassia St Bikeway and Pedestrian Improvements Community/ 2021 Maintenance Cul-de-Sac Reconstruct(2023) Maintenance 2023 Cul-de-Sac Repair(2023) Maintenance 2023 Federal Aid Capital Maintenance(2021)—Phase 1 Maintenance 2021 • Curtis Rd,Targee St/Overland Rd Garden St Bikeway,Albion St/Greenbelt Community 2025 Garden St, Bethel St/Emerald St Community 2025 Garden St, Franklin Rd/Bethel St Community 2022 Kootenai St Traffic Calming,Orchard St/Vista Ave Community 2023-2024 Liberty St Sidewalk and Bikeway, Douglas St/Denton St Community 2023 Maintenance Crack Seal(2021)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2021 Maintenance Crack Seal(2024)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2024 Page 83 Item#6. , Nez Perce St Bikeway,Orchard St/Columbus St Community 2023 Orchard St and Franklin Rd Accessible Pedestrian Signal Traffic Accessibility 2025 Orchard St and Clark St Traffic Safety 2024 Overland Rd and Phillippi St Pedestrian Crossing Community 2021 Overland Rd and Vista Ave Intersection Maintenance and Safety Maintenance/ Future Improvement Traffic Safety Pavement Preservation&ADA(2022)-Phase 1 Maintenance 2022 Phillippi St Bridge#1366, 650' N/O Overland Rd Bridge 2024 Phillippi St,Overland Rd/Cassia St Community 2025 Phillippi St, Malad St/Targee St Community 2021 Phillippi St,Targee St/Overland Rd Community 2021 Roosevelt St, Rose Hill St/Emerald St Community/ 2022 Maintenance Rose Hill St and Owyhee St Mini Roundabout Traffic Safety 2024 Shoshone St Bikeway,Canal St/Capital Blvd Community 2020-2021 Vista Ave and Nez Perce St Pedestrian Crossing Community 2021 Tr BOISE CENTRAL BENCH Page 84 Item#6. BOISE DOWNTOWN PLAN ADOPTED IN 2013 - NEXT UPDATE 2027 PROJECTPROPOSED PROJECT* CONSTRUCTION PROJECT to to St, Economic 05 St and 06 Myrtle St/Fort St,Two-Way Conversion Development Future 11tn St Bridge#1493, 90' N/0 Main St Bridge Future Bannock St Bikeway(West Phase),Whitewater Park Blvd/Ave C Community Future Downtown Boise Implementation Plan (2019)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2021 • 08 th St, Bannock St/State St(CCDC Project) Downtown Boise Implementation Plan (2020)—HB312 Project • 09tn St, University Ave/Front St • 09tn St, Bannock St/State St • 10tn St, Front St/Idaho St • Grove St, 16tn St/09tn St Maintenance 2021-2022 • State St, 16tn Stn/015t St(2022 Construction) • State St and 12t St Pedestrian Crossing(2022 Construction) • State St and 13tn Signal(2022 Construction) • State St and 14tn St Pedestrian Crossing(2022 Construction) Green Stormwater Implementation (2019) Environmental 2020-2021 Pavement Preservation &ADA(2022)—Phase 1 • 09tn St, Idaho St/Bannock St Maintenance 2022 Page 85 Item#6. �� EAST END BOISE EAST -- END PLAN ADOPTED IN 2017 - NEXT UPDATE 2027 PROJECTPROPOSED PROJECT* CONSTRUCTION PROJECT Bannock St Maintenance and Bikeway, Broadway Ave/Greenbelt Community 2024 Broadway Ave/Avenue B and Idaho St/Warm Springs Ave Economic Development Future Coston St, Bannock St/Franklin St Community 2023 Cul-de-Sac Reconstruct(2024) Maintenance 2024 Cul-de-Sac Repair(2024) Maintenance 2024 Franklin St Bikeway, Resseguie St/Bannock St Community 2025 Franklin St, McKinley St/Pierce St Community 2021 Maintenance Crack Seal(2022)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2022 Pierce St,Washington St/Shenandoah Dr Community 2020-2021 Residential Capital Maintenance(2020)—HB312 Project • Maple Ave,Warm Springs Ave/Franklin St Maintenance 2020-2021 • Pierce PI,Shenandoah Dr/north end St. Luke's Master Plan Transportation Component Implementation Cooperative 2021-2025 Warm Springs Ave and Straughan Ave Pedestrian Crossing Community 2023 Page 86 Item#6. BOISE NORTH PLAN ADOPTED IN 2016 - NEXT UPDATE 2026 05th St and Fort St and Hays St Economic Future Development 09th St and Washington St Pedestrian Crossing Community 2023 11th St Maintenance and Bikeway,State St/Heron St Community/ 2022 Maintenance 13th St Traffic Calming(Phase 1), Fort St/Hill Rd Community 2021 16th St Bridge#1484, 150' N/O Washington St Bridge Future 24'St Road and Bridge Projects Bridge 2022 26th St Bridge#1321, 160'S/O Hill Rd Bridge 2023 28'St, Hazel St/Irene St Community 2020-2021 32"d St Bridge#1308,50'S/O Hill Rd Bridge 2021 33rd St Bridge#1318, 20'S/O Forsythia St Bridge 2021 38th St, Bush Ave/Sunset Ave Community 2022 Bannock St Bikeway(West Phase),Whitewater Park Blvd/Ave C Community Future Bikeway Signage(2022) • 18th St Bikeway, Idaho St/Hill Rd • 23rd St Bikeway, Fairview Ave/Breneman St Community 2022 • Breneman St Bikeway,36 th St/18 th St • Ellis-Resseguie Bikeway,28th St/08th St h Pa e 87 • Fairview-Main Bikeway,Garden St/17 St 9 )OSED PROJECTS Item#6. CONTINUED PROJECT NAME PROJECT TYPE Cul-de-Sac Reconstruct(2024)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2024 Cul-de-Sac Repair(2024)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2024 Fairview Ave Bridge#2196 and#2197, Boise River Bridge Future Franklin St Bikeway, Resseguie St/Bannock St Community 2025 Hazel St, 28th St/26th St Community 2020-2021 Irene St,32"d St/28th St Community Future Maintenance Crack Seal (2022)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2022 Parkhill Dr Bridge#1383, 200'W/O 15th St Bridge 2025 Pavement Preservation &ADA(2022)—Phase 1 • 20th St, Lemp St/Irene St Maintenance 2022 • 26th St,State St/Heron St Pavement Preservation &ADA(2022)—Phase 3 • Fort St, 16th St/15th St Maintenance 2022 • Resseguie St, 16th St/08th St Residential Capital Maintenance(2020)—HB312 Project • 10th St, Fort St/Heron St • Cunningham PI,08th St/06th St Maintenance 2020-2021 • Heron St, Harrison Blvd 13th St • O'Farrell St, 13th St/04t St State St, 36th St/27th St Roadway Future State St,Collister Dr/36th St Roadway Future Taft St,Sycamore Dr/36th St Community Future Whitewater Park Blvd Basin#1009 Environmental Future Z 1111146 a apt�NQR BOISE %-7m V4�ff NORTH Page 88 Item#6. BOISE NORTHWF PLAN ADOPTED IN 2015 - NEXT UPDATE 2025 Bikeway Signage(2021)—Phase 2 • Bloom St Bikeway,Greenbelt/Collister Dr Community 2021 • Northwest Boise Bikeway, Horseshoe Bend Rd/36th St Bogart Ln,SH 44(State St)/Sloan St Community 2021 Carlsbad Way Bridge#1419, 500' N/O State St Bridge 2025 Crewe Ave Bridge#1046,300'S/O Devonwood Dr Bridge Future Cul-de-Sac Reconstruct(2024)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2024 Cul-de-Sac Repair(2024)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2024 Hill Rd,Castle Dr/Outlook Ave Community Future Horseshoe Bend Rd,State St/Hill Rd Community 2023 Maintenance Crack Seal(2022)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2022 Pavement Preservation &ADA(2022)—Phase 1 • Bluegrass Ave, Ellens Ferry Dr/Castle Dr • Castle Hill Way/Drawbridge Dr Maintenance 2022 • Drawbridge Dr,west end/Castle Hill Way • Turret Way,Castle Dr/Drawbridge Dr Pavement Preservation &ADA(2022)—Phase 2 Maintenance 2022 • Collister Dr,Quail Ridge Dr/north end Pierce Park Ln Bridge#2029,at Hill Rd Bridge/Intersection Future Roe St, Limelight St/Caswell St Community Fu Page 89 Item#6. , State St and Collister Dr(Carryover Costs) Intersection 2019 State St and Glenwood St Intersection Future State St and Pierce Park Ln Intersection Future State St,Collister Dr/36th St Roadway Future State St, Pierce Park Ln/Collister Dr Roadway Future Taft St,Sycamore Dr/36th St Community Future BOISE NORTHWEST Page 90 BOISE NORTHWEST BOISE SOUTHEAST PLAN ADOPTED IN 2014 - NEXT UPDATE 2024 - SOUBOISE THEAST PROPOSED0 N— -1 " PROJECTS" PROJECT . . � Bikeway Signage(2022) • Protest Hill Bikeway(Includes Lincoln&University),Vista Ave/ Community 2022 Greenbelt Bikeway Signage(2025) • Manitou Bikeway,Broadway Ave/University Dr Community 2022 Boise Ave and Linden St Pedestrian Crossing Community 2023 Bridge Preventative Maintenance(2021) • Federal Way Bridge, E/O Bergeson St Bridge 2021 Columbia Village Bikeway,SH 21/Boise Ave Community 2024 Cul-de-Sac Reconstruct(2023)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2023 Cul-de-Sac Repair(2023)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2023 Division Ave, Highland St/Hale St Community 2021 Eckert Rd Bridge#2147 and#2148, Boise River/Ridenbaugh Canal Bridge Future Federal Aid Capital Maintenance(2021)—Phase 1 • Boise Ave, Broadway Ave/Gekeler Ln Maintenance 2021 • Linden St, Broadway Ave/Gekeler Ln • Surprise Way,Amity Rd/SH 21 Federal Aid Capital Maintenance(2021)—Phase 2 • Grand Forest Dr,Gowen Rd/Rockrose Way Maintenance 2021 • Lake Forest Dr, Federal Way/Summersweet Dr Maintenance Crack Seal(2021)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2021 Mallard Ave Bridge#1339, 650'W/O Parkcenter Blvd Bridge 2 Page 91 Item#6. BOISE SOUTHWFST PLAN ADOPTED IN 2018 — NEXT UPDATE 2028 PROJECT1� 'REP- Inow- 4 mrr� PROPOSED PROJECT9st CONSTRUCTION ROJ ECT TYPE_ YEAR Amity Rd and Cloverdale Rd Roundabout Intersection 2025 Amity Rd and Five Mile Rd Intersection Future Amity Rd and Maple Grove Rd Intersection 2024-2025 Arterial&Collector Capital Maintenance(2023)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2023 • Maple Grove Rd,south end/Tarp Dr Cloverdale Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd Roadway 2025 Cloverdale Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd Roadway 2025 Cloverdale Rd, Lake Hazel Rd/Amity Rd Roadway Future Cole Rd and Victory Rd Intersection 2020-2021 Desert Ave, Latigo Dr/Round Up St Community 2025 Five Mile Rd and Seneca Dr Pedestrian Crossing Community 2020-2021 Five Mile Rd and Smoke Ranch Dr Pedestrian Crossing Community 2021 Five Mile Rd and La Grange St Pedestrian Crossing Community 2022 Five Mile Rd,Overland Rd/Franklin Rd Roadway Future Five Mile Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd Roadway Fu Page 92 Item#6. , Five Mile Rd, Lake Hazel Rd/Amity Rd Roadway Future Hollandale-Targee Bikeway, Locust Grove Rd/Targee St Community 2024 Lake Hazel Rd and Cloverdale Rd Intersection 2024 Lake Hazel Rd and Five Mile Rd Intersection 2025 Lake Hazel Rd and Maple Grove Rd Intersection 2023 Lake Hazel Rd,Cloverdale Rd/Five Mile Rd Roadway 2025 Lake Hazel Rd, Eagle Rd/Cloverdale Rd Roadway 2024 Lake Hazel Rd, Five Mile Rd/Maple Grove Rd Roadway Future Lake Hazel Rd, Maple Grove Rd/Cole Rd Roadway Future Maintenance Crack Seal (2020)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2020-2021 Maintenance Crack Seal (2024)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2024 Maple Grove Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd Roadway 2021 Maple Grove Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd Roadway 2024-2025 Maple Grove Rd, Lake Hazel Rd/Amity Rd Roadway Future Residential Capital Maintenance(2023)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2023 Reutzel Dr Bridge#1249, 165'W/O Summerset Way Bridge 2024 Valley St, Lake Hazel Rd/La Grange St Community 2020-2021 Victory Rd and Five Mile Rd Intersection Future Page 93 BOISE SOUTHWEST )OSED PROJECTS Item#6. CONTINUED PROJECT NAME PROJECT TYPE YEAR Victory Rd,Cloverdale Rd/Five Mile Rd Roadway Future Victory Rd, Eagle Rd/Cloverdale Rd Roadway Future Victory Rd, Five Mile Rd/Maple Grove Rd Roadway Future Victory Rd, Maple Grove Rd/Cole Rd Roadway Future o Page 94 • SOUTHWEST 4 F_i r� BOISE WE T BENCH S PLAN ADOPTED IN 2013 - NEXT UPDATE 2023 BOISE BENCH T BENCH Allumbaugh St, Fairview Ave/Northview St Community 2024 Benjamin Ln and BVRR Crossing Improvement Traffic Safety 2022 Bikeway Signage(2023) • Chinden-McMilIan Bikeway(Phase 1), Bennington Way/ Community 2023 Mitchell St • Mitchell St Bikeway, Emerald St/Maple Grove Rd Bikeway Signage(2024) • Granger Ave Bikeway, Records Ave/Shamrock Ave • McMillan-Ustick Bikeway(Phase 1),Cloverdale Rd/Sawgrass Way Community 2024 • McMillan-Ustick Bikeway(Phase 2), Linwood Way/Cloverdale Rd • Records Way Bikeway,Pine Ave/Chinden Blvd Bryson Ave Bridge#1134, 750' N/O Fairview Ave Bridge 2022 Christine St, Northview St/Ustick Rd Community 2023 Clement St, Cabarton Ln/Mountain View Dr Community 2025 Cory Ln, Mitchell St/Maple Grove Rd Community 2023 Enhanced School Crossings—Meridian Middle School and Capital Community 2021 High School Fairview Ave and Curtis Rd Accessible Pedestrian Signal Traffic Accessibility 2021 Fairview Ave and Milwaukee St Accessible Pedestrian Signal Traffic Accessibility 2021 Fairview Ave and Orchard St Traffic Accessibility 2 Page 95 Item#6. , Federal Aid Capital Maintenance(2021)—Phase 1 • Curtis Rd, Fairview Ave/Ustick Rd Maintenance 2021 • Fairview Ave, Maple Grove Rd/Milwaukee St Federal Aid Capital Maintenance(2021)—Phase 2 Maintenance 2021 • Edna St, Five Mile Rd/Mitchell St Fiddler Dr Bridge#1510, 130'W/O Arlen Dr Bridge 2024 Five Mile Rd,Overland Rd/Franklin Rd Roadway Future Lena Ave Bridge#1509, 125' N/O Hickory Dr Bridge 2023 Linda Vista Ln, Cory Ln/Ustick Rd Community Future Maintenance Crack Seal (2024)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2024 Maple Grove Rd and Edna St Pedestrian Crossing Community 2024 McMillan Rd,Westview Dr/Maple Grove Rd Community 2020-2021 Milwaukee St, Marcum St/Ustick Rd Community 2025 Pavement Preservation &ADA(2022)—Phase 1 • Maple Grove Rd, 1-84/Franklin Rd Maintenance 2022 • Wainwright Dr, Eagle Rd/Borrego Way Poplar St Bikeway, Milwaukee St/Orchard St Community Future Residential Capital Maintenance(2023)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2023 • Cruser Dr,west end/Five Mile Rd Safe Sidewalk Program (2021) Community 2021 Safe Sidewalk Program(2022) Community 2022 Shamrock Ave Bridge#1424, 0.1 miles N/O Fairview Ave Bridge 2021 Shoup Ave Bridge#1404,0.25 miles W/O Maple Grove Rd Bridge 2023 Ustick-Northview Bikeway Connection,Shamrock Ave/Milwaukee St Community Future Wildwood St Bridge#1425,0.1 miles N/O Fairview Ave Bridge 2024 Page 96 EAGLE EAG LF PLAN ADOPTED IN 2019 - NEXT UPDATE 2029 - PROJECT1� 'REP- mrr� PROPOSED PROJECTST CONSTRUCTION ROJ ECT TYPE YEAR Aikens St, Eagle Rd/02"d St Economic 2023-2024 Development Cul-de-Sac Reconstruct(2025)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2025 Cul-de-Sac Repair(2025)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2025 Eagle Rd and State Intersection 2023 Floating Feather Rd Bridge#1513, 0.1 miles E/O Palmer Ln Bridge 2023 Horseshoe Bend Rd and Floating Feather Rd Community 2023 Horseshoe Bend Rd and Shadowview St Pedestrian Crossing Community 2020-2021 Horseshoe Bend Rd,State St/Hill Rd Community 2023 Linder Rd and Floating Feather Rd Roundabout Intersection 2024 Linder Rd,Chinden Blvd (US 20/26)/SH 44(State St)—South Phase Roadway Future Linder Rd,SH 44(State St)/Floating Feather Rd Roadway 2024 Linder-Meridian Bikeway, Pine Ave/Temple Dr Community 2025 Maintenance Crack Seal(2023)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2023 Palmer Ln Bridge#1009, N/0 Floating Feather Rd Bridge 2023 US 20/26(Chinden Blvd)and Locust Grove Rd Intersection 202 Page 97 Item#6. GARDEN CITY PLAN ONGOING IN 2020 32"d St, US 20/26 (Chinden Blvd)/Clay St Community 2023 33rd St, US 20/26(Chinden Blvd)/Greenbelt Community Future 35th St, US 20/26(Chinden Blvd)/Greenbelt Community Future 37th St Bridge#1441, 350'SW/O Adams St Bridge 2025 38th St Bridge#1440,0.2 miles N/O Chinden Blvd Bridge 2021 415Y St Bridge#1437, 600' N/O Chinden Blvd Bridge 2021 44th St Bridge#1433,0.1 miles N/O Chinden Blvd Bridge 2021 45th St Bridge#1432, 500' N/O Chinden Blvd Bridge 2022 Bikeway Signage(2022) • Orchard St Hill, Irving Community 2022 Bikeway Signage(2025) • 43rd St Bikeway Connect, Ustick Rd/Greenbelt Community 2025 Bridge Preventative Maintenance(2021) Bridge 2024 Clay St,34th St/32"d St Community 2024 Clay St,37th St/34th St;34th St, Chinden Blvd/Clay St Community 2025 Maintenance Crack Seal(2024)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2024 State St and Glenwood St Intersection Fu Page 98 Item#6. , State St and Pierce Park Ln Intersection Future State St, Pierce Park Ln/Collister Dr Roadway Future Thurman Mill Bridge Projects Water Quality Mitigation Environmental 2022 US 20/26(Chinden Blvd)and 43rd St Pedestrian Crossing Community 2023 US 20/26(Chinden Blvd)and Curtis Rd Intersection 2021 L.AKIJEN CITY GARDEN CITY Page 99 Item#6. KU NA DOWNTOWN PLAN ADOPTED IN 2012 - FULL PLAN IN 2021 Arterial&Collector Capital Maintenance(2022)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2022 • Avalon St,Swan Falls Rd/Orchard Ave Avenue B,02"d St/Main St Community Future Avenue C, Main St/04th St Community 2022 Avenue D, Main St/041h St Community 2024 Black Cat Rd Bridge#1305,0.21 miles N/O King Rd Bridge 2025 Columbia Rd Bridge#1283,0.2 miles E/O Ten Mile Rd Bridge 2024 Deer Flat Rd and School Ave Pedestrian Crossing Community 2020-2021 Deer Flat Rd,School Ave/Deerhorn Ave Community 2020-2021 Kuna Middle School Zone,Ten Mile Ave and Boise St Community 2022 Linder Ave,Swan Falls Rd/02"d St;Avalon St,Swan Falls Rd/ Community Future Orchard St Linder Rd and Deer Flat Rd Intersection 2020-2021 Linder Rd, Main St/Deer Flat Rd Community 2024 Maintenance Crack Seal(2020)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2020-2021 School Ave Bikeway, King Rd/Deer Flat Rd Community 2025 Ten Mile Rd and Columbia Rd Intersection F page 100 )OSED PROJECTS Item#6. CONTINUED PROJECT NAME PROJECT TYPE YEAR Ten Mile Rd and Hubbard Rd Intersection Future Ten Mile Rd and Deer Flat Rd Intersection 2024 Ten Mile Rd and Lake Hazel Rd Intersection Future %-71 94�L%*jg KU NA Page 101 Item#6. MERIDIAN DOWNTOWN PLAN ADOPTED IN 2012 - NEXT UPDATE 2023 PROJECTPROPOSED PROJECT9st CONSTRUCTION ROJ ECT TYPE YEAR Broadway Ave,West 0811 St/West 04'St Community 2025 Cherry Ln and Meridian Library Pedestrian Crossing Community 2020-2021 Cul-de-Sac(2021)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2021 East 02%St, Carlton Ave/Fairview Ave Community Future East 03rd St, Franklin Rd/Carlton St Community 2025 Enhanced School Crossings—Meridian Middle School and Capital Community 2021 High School Federal Aid t Capital Maintenance(2021)—Phase 3 Maintenance 2021 • West 08 St, Pine Ave/Cherry Ln Linder Rd, Franklin Rd/Pine Ave Roadway 2020-2021 Linder Rd,Overland Rd/Franklin Rd Roadway Future Linder-Meridian Bikeway, Pine Ave/Temple Dr Community 2025 Locust Grove Rd and Woodbridge Dr Pedestrian Crossing Community 2023 Main St and King St Pedestrian Crossing Community 2025 Maintenance Crack Seal(2025)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2025 Pine Ave and West 015T St Pedestrian Crossing Community Future Economic Pine Ave, Meridian Rd/Locust Grove Rd-Stormwater Basin Development Page 102 Item#6. , Residential Capital Maintenance(2022)—HB312 Project • Bower St, Main St/east end • Broadway Ave, East 03rd St/East 06th St • Carlton Ave, Main St h East 02%St • Cherry Ave,West 04t St/Meridian Rd • East 02nd St, Broadway Ave/Carlton Ave • East 02%St,Carlton Ave/Fairview Ave • East 03rd St/Franklin Rd/Bower St • East 04th St, Broadway Ave/State Ave • East 04th St,Washington Ave/Janie Ln • East 05th St, Franklin Rd/Bower St Maintenance 2022 • East 05 St,State Ave/Badley Ave • Idaho Ave,West 08th St/Meridian Rd • Maple Ave,West 015Y St/Meridian Rd • State Ave, Main St/Cathy Ln • Waltman Ln,west end/Meridian Rd • Washington Ave, East 02%St/Cathy Ave • Washington St,West 07th St/Meridian Rd • West 02nd St,Cherry Ave/Fairview Ave • West 03rd St, Pine Ave/north end • West 04th St, Broadway Ave/north end • West 06th St,Carlton Ave/Washington St Residential Capital Maintenance(2023)—HB312 Project • Rose Cir,West 015Y St/West 015t St Maintenance 2023 • West 015Y St,south end/Franklin Rd MERIDIAN Page 103 DOWNTOWN MERIDIAN MERIDIAN NORTH NORTH PLAN ONGOING IN 2020 PROPOSED" PROJECTS" PROJECT ROJ ECT TYPE CONSTRUCTION . . Bikeway Signage(2024) • Granger Ave Bikeway, Records Ave/Shamrock Ave Community 2024 • McMillan-Ustick Bikeway, Linwood Way/Cloverdale Rd • Records Way Bikeway,Pine Ave/Chinden Blvd Cherry Ln and Meridian Library Pedestrian Crossing Community 2020-2021 Cul-de-Sac Reconstruct(2025)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2025 Cul-de-Sac Repair(2021)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2021 Cul-de-Sac Repair(2025)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2025 Fairview Ave and Locust Grove Rd Intersection 2023 Fairview Ave, Locust Grove Rd/SH 55 (Eagle Rd) Roadway 2023 Franklin Rd and McDermott Rd Intersection Future Linder Rd,Cherry Ln/Ustick Rd Roadway Future Linder-Meridian Bikeway, Pine Ave/Temple Dr Community 2025 Locust Grove Rd and Woodbridge Dr Pedestrian Crossing Community 2023 Maintenance Crack Seal(2023)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2023 Maintenance Crack Seal(2025)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2025 McMillan Rd and Black Cat Rd Interim Signal Intersection Page 104 )OSED PROJECTS Item#6. CONTINUED CONSTRUCTION McMillan Rd,Cortana Way/Goddard Creek Way Community Future McMillan Rd, Red Horse Way/Locust Grove Rd Community Future Meridian Rd,Cherry Ln/Ustick Rd Roadway 2020-2021 Meridian Rd, McMillan Rd/US 20/26(Chinden Blvd) Roadway Future Meridian Rd, Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd Roadway Future Residential Capital Maintenance(2023)—HB312 Project • Blossom PI,south end/north end • Larkspur Ct,south end/Verbena Dr • Laurel Ct,south end/Verbena Dr Maintenance 2023 • Lavender Ct,south end/Verbena Dr • Lawndale Dr,Crestmont Dr/McGlinchey Ave • Lilac St,south end/Verbena Dr • McGlinchey Ave, Blossom PI/West 08th St Star Rd Bridge#1092, 0.35 miles S/0 Chinden Blvd Bridge Future Star Rd Bridge#1093, 0.25 miles S/0 McMillan Rd Bridge 2023 Star Rd Bridge#2040, 0.28 miles S/0 McMillan Rd Bridge 2023 Ten Mile Rd and Cherry Ln Intersection Future Ten Mile Rd, McMillan Rd/US 20/26(Chinden Blvd) Roadway 2020-2021 Ten Mile Rd, Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd Roadway 2020-2021 US 20/26 (Chinden Blvd)and Locust Grove Rd Intersection 2020-2021 Ustick Rd and Black Cat Rd Interim Signal Intersection 2021 Ustick Rd,Ten Mile Rd/Linder Rd Roadway 2025 Wells St Bridge#1224, 0.2 miles S/0 Magic View Dr Bridge Future Page 105 MERIDIAN MERIDIAN SOUTH SOUTH PLAN PROPOSED FOR 2021 PROPOSED-REEF- -ME111V " PROJECTS" PROJECT ROJ ECT TYPE CONSTRUCTION YEAR Amity Rd and Locust Grove Rd Interim Signal Intersection 2023 Arterial&Collector Capital Maintenance(2022)—HB312 Project • Amity Rd,SH 69 (Meridian Rd)/Locust Grove Rd Maintenance 2022 • Harris St, Kentucky Way/SH 69(Meridian Rd) • Victory Rd, McDermott Rd/Ten Mile Rd Aspen Cove Dr Bridge#2084, 280'W/O Linder Rd Bridge Future Cul-de-Sac Repair(2021)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2021 Eagle Rd and Amity Rd Roundabout(Dual Lane) Intersection 2021 Eagle Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd Roadway 2021 . Eagle Rd, Lake Hazel Rd/Amity Rd Roadway 2023 Hollandale-Targee Bikeway, Locust Grove/Targee St Community 2024 . Lake Hazel Rd and Eagle Rd Intersection 2022 Lake Hazel Rd, Eagle Rd/Cloverdale Rd Roadway 2024 Linder Rd,Overland Rd/Franklin Rd Roadway Future Locust Grove Rd Bridge#1207, 0.17 miles S/O Victory Rd Bridge Future Locust Grove Rd and Palermo Dr Pedestrian Crossing Community 2023 Locust Grove Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd Roadway Page 106 )OSED PROJECTS Item#6. CONTINUED CONSTRUCTION YEAR Maintenance Crack Seal(2020)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2020-2021 Maintenance Crack Seal(2025)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2025 Overland Rd and Eagle Rd Intersection Future Residential Capital Maintenance(2023)—HB312 Project • Country Terrace Way,south end/Overland Rd Maintenance 2023 • Francine PI,Victory Rd/north end • Tobago Ct,west end/East 05th Way Stoddard Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd Community 2024 Ten Mile Rd and Victory Rd Intersection 2022-2023 Ten Mile Rd and Amity Rd Intersection 2021 Ten Mile Rd and Lake Hazel Rd Intersection Future Ten Mile Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd Roadway 2022-2023 Topaz Ave Bridge#1220, 0.1 miles N/O Overland Rd Bridge 2025 Victory Rd and Standing Timber Ave Pedestrian Crossing Community 2020-2021 Victory Rd and Locust Grove Rd Roundabout Intersection 2022 Victory Rd, Eagle Rd/Cloverdale Rd Roadway Future Victory Rd, Locust Grove Rd/Eagle Rd Roadway Future Victory Rd,SH 69(Meridian Rd)/Locust Grove Rd Roadway 2025 Page 107 Item#6. STAR �\ STA R ilio PLAN ADOPTED IN 2018 — NEXT UPDATE 2028 PROPOSED" PROJECT" PROJECT PROJECT M=md J AL YEAR Arterial&Collector Capital Maintenance(2023)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2023 • New Hope Rd,Can Ada Rd/Wing Rd Brandon Rd Bridge#1460, 550' N/0 Floating Feather Rd Bridge 2025 Can Ada Rd Bridge#1004,740' N/0 SH 44(State St) Bridge Future Cul-de-Sac Reconstruct(2025)-HB312 Project Maintenance 2025 Cul-de-Sac Repair(2025)- HB312 Project Maintenance 2025 Floating Feather Rd Bridge#2028,580' E/O Munger Rd Bridge 2024 Floating Feather Rd, Brandon Rd/Hornback Ave Community 2023 Maintenance Crack Seal(2023)—HB312 Project Maintenance 2023 Munger Rd Bridge#1005 and#2001,%mile S/0 New Hope Rd Bridge Future Munger Rd Bridge#1462, 550'S/0 New Hope Rd Bridge 2024 Pollard Ln, Floating Feather Rd/Star Middle School Community 2023 Page 108 Item#6. DEFINITION OF METRICS The following provides a summary of the various metrics found in this report and the information from which the metric is derived. Many metrics rely on the status of a project or location being built out to the planned level of improvement. As such, the following should be used to interpret this information: • Complete—The location or project is built out to the planned level. • Programmed —The location or project is identified for improvement in the adopted IFYWP. • Future—The location or project is identified as a planned improvement but is not currently funding in the adopted IFYWP. The information below is organized according to each travel mode. All metrics in the Transportation Choice section are reported at the county-wide level. ACHD Serves You When You Drive • Building Out Your Major Roads—This metric reviews the current status of buildout of the planned arterial network lane miles as identified in ACHD's Master Street Map. • Managing the Congestion You Face—This metric evaluates the number of project locations (road segments and intersections)that are not already built out and their status as it relates to funding those improvements. • About Funding—This metric reflects the amount of impact fees collected in the reporting year. This is not a reflection on total funding allocated to road and intersection improvements but focuses only on the funds collected specifically designated for road and intersection improvements. ACHD Serves You When You Bike • Building the Right Bike Facilities For You—This metric reviews the current status of buildout of the planned bicycle network as identified in ACHD's 2018 Bike Master Plan Addendum.The data is reported at the roadway centerline mile level for each facility level. Page 109 Item#6. • Increasing Access With A Low-Stress Network—This series of metrics reports on ACHD's efforts to buildout a network of low-stress bikeways.The data is reported at the roadway centerline mile level for the planned network. Not all facilities in this network meet the Level 1 facility designation.This was necessary in order to provide for the adequate connections to make a complete network. A portion of this network is deemed completed when the segment of roadway is branded with the identifying bikeway signage and wayfinding. Of note,the publicly accessible pathways provided by local land use entities are included in the network for the population access figures. ACHD Serves You When You Walk • Building Sidewalks Where You Want Them—This metric reviews the current status of buildout of the planned sidewalk network as identified in ACHD's various neighborhood bike and pedestrian plans.The data is reported at the roadway centerline mile level by roadway functional classification.A roadway segment is deemed to have complete sidewalk facilities when it has sidewalk on both sides of arterial and collector roadways as appropriate or on at least one side of local streets when they have been identified for sidewalks in an adopted neighborhood plan.This standard of sidewalks on one side of local streets is reflective of historic roadways built at a time when sidewalks where not required through the development process. When built through development, ACHD policy generally requires sidewalk on both sides of the street, thus exceeding the threshold for this metric. • Filling Key Gaps In The Sidewalk Network—This metric reviews the current status of buildout of identified key gaps in the sidewalk network within 1 mile of identified key destination.The metric is reported at the roadway centerline mile level.The geographic limitation ensures focus on areas where individuals are most likely to desire to walk.A key gap is defined as a roadway segment where sidewalk is planned that meets one of the following criteria: • Arterial roadway segments with pedestrian facility gaps on at least one side of the street • Collector roadway segments with pedestrian facility gaps on both sides of the street • Local roadway segments with pedestrian facility gaps on both sides and an average daily traffic of at least 1,000 vehicles per day • Improving Your Access To Where You Want To Go—This metric reports on the percent of the current population that can access an identified key destination with a 1-mile walk along the existing sidewalk network.This metric is heavily influenced by the availability of these key destinations through out the County. ACHD Serves All People • Improving Pedestrian Ramp Accessibility—The metric report on the improvement status of pedestrian ramps deemed non-compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act as identified in ACHD's 2019 update to its ADA Transition Plan. Complete locations reflect the number of ramp locations that have been improved to be compliant with the ADA. Completion data is based on IFYWP projects completed in 2019 and is not an audited summary.The ACHD ADA Annual Report will contain the final figure. Page 110 Item#6. • Improving Sidewalk Accessibility-The metric report on the improvement status of miles of sidewalk deemed non-compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act as identified in ACHD's 2019 update to its ADA Transition Plan. Complete locations reflect the number of sidewalk miles that have been improved to be compliant with the ADA. Completion data is based on IFYWP projects completed in 2019 and is not an audited summary.The ACHD ADA Annual Report will contain the final figure. • Providing Accessible Pedestrian Signals—This metric reflects the number of intersections and enhanced crossings where accessible pedestrian signals have been installed.The total number is reflective of the locations requested by ACHD's Americans with Disabilities Act Advisory Committee as locations identified as desirable for improvement to this level. These locations are prioritized and reported on annually to the Committee. Page 111 )EiINTEGRATED FIVE-YEAR WORK PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2021-2025 Bridges .. Major Bridges Estimated Cost Project Name Project■ . . ® ==��= Project.. Fairview Ave Bridge Replace bridges#2196 and B Future Future Future $900,000 $0 $7,497,000 Dale #2196 and#2197, #2197 over the Boise River as Kuperus Boise River part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Floating Feather Rd Replace/widen bridge#2028 S 2021 2023 2024 $194,000 $78,000 $1,731,000 David Bridge#2028,580' over Middleton Canal on Rader E/O Munger Rd Floating Feather Rd as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program.Includes a detached pathway on the south side between Wild Mustang and Meadow Lake. Gowen Rd Bridge Replace bridge 42110 over the B 2019-2020 2020 2021 $547,000 $2,000 $7,639,000 Brian #2110,W/O 1-84 UPRR tracks as part of ACHD's McCarthy Bridge Maintenance Program. Pierce Park Ln Bridge Replace bridge#2029 over the B 2022 2023 Future $455,000 $673,000 $3,595,000 Brian #2029,at Hill Rd Farmers Union Canal on Pierce McCarthy Park Ln as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Includes reconstruction of the intersection to the 2016 CIP configuration. Page 112 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. s DescriptionEstimated Cost Project Name Project ® ==��= Project .. 11th St Bridge#1493, Replace bridge#1493 over the B 2023 2024 Future $117,000 $2,000 $380,000 Ryan Cutler 90'N/O Main St Boise City Canal on 11th St as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. 16th St Bridge#1484, Replace bridge#1484 over the B 2024 Future Future $38,000 $2,000 $408,000 Dale 150'N/O Washington St Boise City Canal on 16th St Kuperus as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. 24th St Road and Replace bridges#1466 on B 2019 2020 2022 $196,000 $10,000 $1,273,000 David Bridge Projects Irene St,#1467 on 24th St, Rader and#1468 on Bella St over the Boise City Canal as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. 26th St Bridge#1321, Replace bridge#1321 over the B 2021 2022 2023 $64,000 $8,000 $336,000 David 160'S/O Hill Rd Boise City Canal on 26th St Rader as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program.Includes sidewalk connection on the west side to Hill Rd. 32nd St Bridge#1308, Replace bridge#1308 over the B 2019 2019 2021 $49,000 $6,000 $285,000 Seth 50'S/O Hill Rd Boise City Canal on 32nd St Jarsky as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. 33rd St Bridge#1318, Replace bridge#1318 over the B 2019 2019 2021 $49,000 $5,000 $241,000 Seth 20'S/O Forsythia St Boise City Canal on 33rd St Jarsky as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. 37th St Bridge#1441, Replace bridge#1441 over G 2021 2022 2025 $0 $5,000 $260,000 Chris 350'SW/O Adams St Thurman Mill on 37th St as Dayley part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program.In-house design. 38th St Bridge#1440, Replace bridge#1440 over the G 2019-2020 2019 2021 $55,000 $9,000 $286,000 Chris 0.2 miles N/O Chinden Thurman Mill Canal on 38th St Dayley Blvd as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. 41st St Bridge#1437, Replace bridge#1437 over the G 2018 2019 2021 $2,000 $6,000 $105,000 Jason 600'N/O Chinden Blvd Thurman Mill Canal on 41st St Tugby as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program.In-house design. 44th St Bridge#1433, Replace bridge#1433 over the G 2019 2019 2021 $2,000 $12,000 $175,000 Jason 0.1 miles N/O Chinden Thurman Mill Canal on 44th St Tugby Blvd as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program.In-house design. 45th St Bridge#1432, Replace bridge#1432 over the G 2019 2019 2022 $2,000 $8,000 $132,000 Jason 500'N/O Chinden Blvd Thurman Mill Canal on 45th St Tugby as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program.In-house design. Aspen Cove Dr Bridge Replace bridge#2084 over the M 2025 Future Future $72,000 $36,000 $490,000 Dale #2084,280'W/O Ridenbaugh Canal on Aspen Kuperus Linder Rd Cove Dr as part of ACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Page 113 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. s DescriptionEstimated Cost Project Name Project ® ==��= Project.. Black Cat Rd Bridge Replace bridge#1305 over the A 2021 2022 2025 $120,000 $7,000 $495,000 Chris #1305,0.21 miles N/O Benton Lateral on Black Cat Dayley King Rd Rd as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Brandon Rd Bridge Replace bridge#1460 over Dry S 2022 2023 2025 $85,000 $39,000 $594,000 Jason #1460,550'N/O Creek Canal on Brandon Rd as Tugby Floating Feather Rd part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Bridge Preventative Bridge deck overlay and B,G N/A N/A 2021 $0 $0 $200,000 Dale Maintenance(2021) sealing of specified bridges. Kuperus Locations to be identified as part of ACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Bridge Preventative Bridge deck overlay and TBD N/A N/A 2022 $0 $0 $100,000 Dale Maintenance(2022) sealing of specified bridges. Kuperus Locations to be identified as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Bridge Preventative Bridge deck overlay and TBD N/A N/A 2023 $0 $0 $100,000 Dale Maintenance(2023) sealing of specified bridges. Kuperus Locations to be identified as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Bridge Preventative Bridge deck overlay and TBD N/A N/A 2024 $0 $0 $100,000 Dale Maintenance(2024) sealing of specified bridges. Kuperus Locations to be identified as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Bridge Preventative Bridge deck overlay and TBD N/A N/A 2025 $0 $0 $100,000 Dale Maintenance(2025) sealing of specified bridges. Kuperus Locations to be identified as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Bryson Ave Bridge Replace bridge#1134 over the B 2020 2021 2022 $0 $3,000 $242,000 Chris #1134,750'N/O South Slough on Bryson Ave as Dayley Fairview Ave part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. In-house design. Can Ada Rd Bridge Replace bridge#1004 over an S 2023 2024 Future $17,000 $18,000 $108,000 Dale #1004,740'N/O SH 44 irrigation ditch on Can Ada Kuperus (State St) Rd as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Carlsbad Way Bridge Replace bridge#1419 over the B 2022 2023 2025 $40,000 $4,000 $272,000 Brian #1419,500'N/O State Boise Valley Canal on McCarthy St Carlsbad Way as part of ACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Columbia Rd Bridge Replace bridge#1283 over the A,K 2021 2022 2024 $90,000 $20,000 $507,000 Seth #1283,0.2 miles E/O Kuna Canal on Columbia Rd as Jarsky Ten Mile Rd part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Crewe Ave Bridge Replace bridge#1046 over B 2023 2024 Future $56,000 $17,000 $381,000 Ryan Cutler #1046,300'S/O Spoil Bank Canal on Crewe Ave Devonwood Dr as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Fiddler Dr Bridge Replace bridge#1510 over the B 2021 2022 2024 $50,000 $3,000 $328,000 Ryan Cutler #1510,130'W/O Arlen Zinger Lateral on Fiddler Dr Dr as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Page 114 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. s Estimated Cost Project Name Project 0® == • �= Project Description Manager Floating Feather Rd Replace bridge#1513 over E 2021 2022 2023 $3,000 $19,000 $115,000 Cody Bridge#1513,0.1 Foothill Ditch on Floating Homan miles E/O Palmer Ln Feather Rd as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Project to be built in coordination with Palmer Ln Bridge#1009.In-house design. Hanley PI Bridge Replace bridge#1056 over A 2021 2022 2023 $105,000 $17,000 $565,000 Joe Tate #1056,700'N/O Willow Creek on Hanley PI as Chaparral Rd part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Lena Ave Bridge Replace bridge#1509 over the B 2021 2022 2023 $0 $3,000 $282,000 Brian #1509,125'N/O Zinger Lateral on Lena Ave as McCarthy Hickory Dr part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program.In-house design. Locust Grove Rd Replace bridge#1207 over the M 2023 2024 Future $110,000 $63,000 $440,000 Dale Bridge#1207,0.17 Ten Mile Creek on Locust Kuperus miles S/O Victory Rd Grove Rd Rd as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Mallard Ave Bridge Replace bridge#1339 over B 2021 2022 2023 $100,000 $12,000 $673,000 Chris #1339,650'W/O Loggers Creek on Mallard Ave Dayley Parkcenter Blvd as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Munger Rd Bridge Replace bridge#1005 over the S 2023 Future Future $105,000 $125,000 $1,040,000 Seth #1005 and#2001,1/2 Dry Creek Canal and bridge Jarsky mile S/O New Hope Rd #2001 over the Middleton Canal as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Road Trust Funds are available for this project. Munger Rd Bridge Replace bridge#1462 over S 2021 2022 2024 $46,000 $17,000 $294,000 Seth #1462,550'S/O New Foothill Ditch on Munger Rd Jarsky Hope Rd as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Palmer Ln Bridge Replace bridge#1009 over S 2021 2022 2023 $3,000 $3,000 $115,000 Cody #1009,N/O Floating Foothill Ditch on Palmer Ln Homan Feather Rd as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program.In-house design.Project to be built in coordination with Floating Feather Rd Bridge#1513. Parkhill Dr Bridge Replace bridge#1383 over the B 2021 2022 2025 $50,000 $3,000 $425,000 David #1383,200'W/O 15th Crane Creek on Parkhill Dr as Rader St part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Phillippi St Bridge Replace bridge#1366 over B 2021 2022 2024 $49,000 $3,000 $368,000 Jason #1366,650'N/O Farmers Lateral on Phillippi Tugby Overland Rd St as part of ACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Reutzel Dr Bridge Replace bridge#1249 over A 2021 2022 2024 $89,000 $20,000 $486,000 Chris #1249,165'W/O Eight Mile Creek on Reutzel Dayley Summerset Way Dr as part of ACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Shamrock Ave Bridge Replace bridge#1424 over the B 2019-2020 2020 2021 $44,000 $0 $202,000 Joe Tate #1424,0.1 miles N/O South Slough on Shamrock Ave Fairview Ave as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Page 115 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. s DescriptionEstimated Cost Project Name Project ® ==��= Project.. Shoup Ave Bridge Replace bridge#1404 over the B 2021 2022 2023 $63,000 $6,000 $255,000 Cody #1404,0.25 miles W/O Farmers Lateral on Shoup Ave Homan Maple Grove Rd as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Star Rd Bridge#1092, Replace bridge#1092 over A 2025 Future Future $85,000 $57,000 $569,000 Dale 0.35 miles S/O Middle Tap Sublateral on Star Kuperus Chinden Blvd Rd as part of ACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Star Rd Bridge#1093, Replace bridge#1093 over A 2021 2022 2023 $55,000 $19,000 $197,000 Cody 0.25 miles S/O Lawrence Kennedy Canal on Homan McMillan Rd Star Rd as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Star Rd Bridge#2040, Replace bridge#2040 over A 2021 2022 2023 $140,000 $70,000 $670,000 Cody 0.28 miles S/O Five Mile Creek Feeder on Homan McMillan Rd Star Rd as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Topaz Ave Bridge Replace bridge#1220 over the M 2022 2023 2025 $62,000 $4,000 $555,000 Jason #1220,0.1 miles N/O Five Mile Creek on Topaz Ave Tugby Overland Rd as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Wells St Bridge Replace bridge#1224 over the M 2024 2025 Future $29,000 $3,000 $586,000 Dale #1224,0.2 miles S/O Five Mile Creek on Wells St Kuperus Magic View Dr as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Wildwood St Bridge Replace bridge#1425 over the B 2021 2022 2024 $66,000 $61,000 $307,000 Joe Tate #1425,0.1 miles N/O South Slough on Wildwood St Fairview Ave as part ofACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Page 116 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Coijifi-Estment Program Cooperative Estimated Cost Project Name Project. . . ject Em ®® ® Pro ,. Corridor Preservation Purchase right-of-way and TBD N/A 2021 N/A $0 $750,000 $750,000 Christy -Impact Fee Eligible fund improvements in Little (2021) conjunction with development to protect and preserve transportation corridors as per the ACHD Master Street Map. Corridor Preservation Purchase right-of-way and TBD N/A 2022 N/A $0 $750,000 $1,250,000 Christy -Impact Fee Eligible fund improvements in Little (2022) conjunction with development to protect and preserve transportation corridors as per the ACHD Master Street Map. Corridor Preservation Purchase right-of-way and TBD N/A 2023 N/A $0 $1,500,000 $0 Christy -Impact Fee Eligible fund improvements in Little (2023) conjunction with development to protect and preserve transportation corridors as per the ACHD Master Street Map. Corridor Preservation Purchase right-of-way and TBD N/A 2024 N/A $0 $1,500,000 $0 Christy -Impact Fee Eligible fund improvements in Little (2024) conjunction with development to protect and preserve transportation corridors as per the ACHD Master Street Map. Corridor Preservation Purchase right-of-way and TBD N/A 2025 N/A $0 $1,500,000 $0 Christy -Impact Fee Eligible fund improvements in Little (2025) conjunction with development to protect and preserve transportation corridors as per the ACHD Master Street Map. Corridor Preservation Purchase right-of-way and TBD N/A 2021 N/A $0 $450,000 $0 Christy -Non-Impact Fee fund improvements in Little Eligible(2021) conjunction with development to protect and preserve transportation corridors as per the ACHD Master Street Map. Corridor Preservation Purchase right-of-way and TBD N/A 2022 N/A $0 $450,000 $0 Christy -Non-Impact Fee fund improvements in Little Eligible(2022) conjunction with development to protect and preserve transportation corridors as per the ACHD Master Street Map. Corridor Preservation Purchase right-of-way and TBD N/A 2023 N/A $0 $200,000 $0 Christy -Non-Impact Fee fund improvements in Little Eligible(2023) conjunction with development to protect and preserve transportation corridors as per the ACHD Master Street Map. Page 117 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. Es Project Name Project . . ject ® ®® M • •.. •' Corridor Preservation Purchase right-of-way and TBD N/A 2024 N/A $0 $200,000 $0 Christy -Non-Impact Fee fund improvements in Little Eligible(2024) conjunction with development to protect and preserve transportation corridors as per the ACHD Master Street Map. Corridor Preservation Purchase right-of-way and TBD N/A 2025 N/A $0 $200,000 $0 Christy -Non-Impact Fee fund improvements in Little Eligible(2025) conjunction with development to protect and preserve transportation corridors as per the ACHD Master Street Map. Developers Fund ACHD's share of roadway TBD N/A N/A 2021 $0 $0 $300,000 Christy Cooperative Projects projects done in conjunction Little (2021) with private developers. Developers Fund ACHD's share of roadway TBD N/A N/A 2022 $0 $0 $300,000 Christy Cooperative Projects projects done in conjunction Little (2022) with private developers. Developers Fund ACHD's share of roadway TBD N/A N/A 2023 $0 $0 $300,000 Christy Cooperative Projects projects done in conjunction Little (2023) with private developers. Developers Fund ACHD's share of roadway TBD N/A N/A 2024 $0 $0 $300,000 Christy Cooperative Projects projects done in conjunction Little (2024) with private developers. Developers Fund ACHD's share of roadway TBD N/A N/A 2025 $0 $0 $300,000 Christy Cooperative Projects projects done in conjunction Little (2025) with private developers. St.Luke's Master Payment to St.Luke's for B N/A N/A 2021 $0 $0 $750,000 Christy Plan Transportation implementation of cooperative Little Component projects constructed as per Implementation(2021) the three party development agreement between ACHD,City of Boise,and St.Luke's approved on March 30,2016. St.Luke's Master Payment to St.Luke's for B N/A N/A 2022 $0 $0 $750,000 Christy Plan Transportation implementation of cooperative Little Component projects constructed as per Implementation(2022) the three party development agreement between ACHD,City of Boise,and St.Luke's approved on March 30,2016. St.Luke's Master Payment to St.Luke's for B N/A N/A 2023 $0 $0 $750,000 Christy Plan Transportation implementation of cooperative Little Component projects constructed as per Implementation(2023) the three party development agreement between ACHD,City of Boise,and St.Luke's approved on March 30,2016. St.Luke's Master Payment to St.Luke's for B N/A N/A 2024 $0 $0 $750,000 Christy Plan Transportation implementation of cooperative Little Component projects constructed as per Implementation(2024) the three party development agreement between ACHD,City of Boise,and St.Luke's approved on March 30,2016. Page 118 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. DescriptionEstimated Cost ject Project Name Project ®® •' ® Ma nager St.Luke's Master Payment to St.Luke's for B N/A N/A 2025 $0 $0 $750,000 Christy Plan Transportation implementation of cooperative Little Component projects constructed as per Implementation(2025) the three party development agreement between ACHD,City of Boise,and St.Luke's approved on March 30,2016. Page 119 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. I Estimated Cost ==��= Project Project Name Project Description E Manager Amity Rd and Construct a multi-lane A 2023 2024 2025 $100,000 $680,000 $3,170,000 Brian Cloverdale Rd roundabout as per the 2016 McCarthy Roundabout CIP. Amity Rd and Five Replace signalized A 2025 Future Future $405,000 $639,000 $3,217,000 Jason Mile Rd intersection with a Tugby roundabout. To be constructed as a Multi-lane Roundabout with 2-lanes for the northbound&southbound legs,1-lane for the eastbound&westbound legs. Amity Rd and Maple Replace intersection with a A 2020 2021 2024-2025 $167,000 $438,000 $3,578,000 Cody Grove Rd multi-lane roundabout with a Homan westbound right-turn bypass lane.Includes bridge#1243. Cole Rd and Victory Rd Widen intersection to 7-lanes A,B 2018-2019 2019 2020-2021 $105,000 $2,116,000 $4,497,000 Brian on all legs with median McCarthy U-turns as per the 2016 CIP. Includes Cole, McGlochlin/Victory widening, an enhanced crossing at Diamond,and bridge#1261. Carryover construction payments from FY20. Eagle Rd and Amity Rd Widen existing roundabout to M 2020 2020 2021 $3,000 $0 $3,066,000 Ryan Cutler Roundabout(Dual Lane) a dual lane roundabout as per the 2016 CIP. Eagle Rd and State St Construct a quadrant E 2020-2021 2021-2022 2023 $290,000 $703,000 $7,157,000 Ryan Cutler intersection and widen Eagle Road between Plaza and State to 4 lanes with center median as per the Eagle Rd and State St Intersection Concept Study. Fairview Ave and Widen intersection to 9 lanes M 2020-2021 2021-2022 2023 $387,000 $2,071,000 $6,770,000 Brian Locust Grove Rd on Fairview Ave and 7 lanes McCarthy on Locust Grove Rd,including concrete intersection,curb, gutter,sidewalk,and a Level 3 bike facility as per the 2016 CIP. Lake Hazel Rd and Widen intersection to 5 lanes A 2021 2023 2024 $405,000 $476,000 $4,453,000 Chris Cloverdale Rd on Lake Hazel Rd and 5 lanes Dayley on Cloverdale Rd as per the 2016 CIP. Lake Hazel Rd and Widen and signalize M 2020 2021-2022 2022 $38,000 $568,000 $7,754,000 Joe Tate Eagle Rd intersection to 4/5 lanes on Eagle and 3/5 lanes on Lake Hazel as per the 2016 CIP. In-house design. Lake Hazel Rd and Widen intersection to 6 lanes A 2018-2019 2024 2025 $122,000 $512,000 $2,529,000 Ryan Cutler Five Mile Rd on Lake Hazel Rd and 5 lanes on Five Mile Rd as per the 2016 CIP. Lake Hazel Rd and Widen intersection to 6-lanes A 2021 2022 2023 $300,000 $648,000 $4,112,000 Jason Maple Grove Rd on Lake Hazel Rd and 4-lanes Tugby on Maple Grove Rd as per the 2016 CIP. Page 120 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. I Estimated Cost ==��= Project Project Name Project Description 0 Manager Linder Rd and Deer Improve the intersection of K 2017-2018 2019 2020 $78,000 $1,000 $563,000 Joe Tate Flat Rd Linder Rd and Deer Flat Rd. Includes curb,gutter, sidewalk and bike facilities. Federal aid project. Carryover construction payments from FY20. Linder Rd and Construct a multi-lane E 2020-2021 2021-2022 2024 $250,000 $543,000 $3,259,000 Cody Floating Feather Rd roundabout as per the 2016 Homan Roundabout CIP.To be built with the Linder Rd,State St(SH 44)/ Floating Feather project. Overland Rd and Eagle Widen intersection to 7 lanes M 2025 Future Future $585,000 $1,610,000 $3,770,000 Ricardo Rd on Eagle Rd and 9 lanes on Calderon Overland Rd as per the 2016 CIP.Project to be done in coordination with the Idaho Transportation Department. State St and Improve the intersection of B 2016-2017 2018 2020 $0 $358,000 $286,000 Ryan Cutler Collister Dr State and Collister, including realignment of the Collister leg,curb,gutter, sidewalk,and bike lanes as per the State St TTOP and the 2016 CIP.Includes bridge #2038.Carryover irrigation work. State St and Glenwood Widen intersection as per the B,G Future Future Future $1,270,000 $1,436,000 $14,494,000 Ricardo St State/Glenwood Intersection Calderon Concept Study,including median U-turns and improved bike and pedestrian crossings.Joint project with ITD. State St and Pierce Widen intersection to 4 lanes B,G 2018-2021 2021-2022 Future $917,000 $2,770,000 $7,098,000 Joe Tate Park Ln (Pierce Park)and 7 lanes (State),including sidewalk/buffered bike lane (north)and pathway(south), median and bus pullouts as per the State St TTOP. Ten Mile Rd and Amity Construct a multi-lane A 2018 2019-2020 2021 $0 $355,000 $2,415,000 Brian Rd roundabout.Project includes McCarthy Ten Mile Bridge#1182. In-house design. Ten Mile Rd and Install a single-lane K Future Future Future $500,000 $103,000 $1,784,000 Seth Columbia Rd expandable roundabout as per Jarsky the Ten Mile Corridor Intersection Analysis. Ten Mile Rd and Deer Install a single-lane K 2021-2022 2023 2024 $366,000 $328,000 $2,032,000 David Flat Rd expandable roundabout as per Rader the Ten Mile Corridor Intersection Analysis. Ten Mile Rd and Widen intersection or add K 2023 2024 Future $250,000 $43,000 $1,680,000 Joe Tate Hubbard Rd roundabout as per the 2016 CIP.Traffic analysis should determine the ultimate lane configuration based on growth above projections in the area. Page 121 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. I Estimated Cost ==��= Project Project Name Project Description E Manager Ten Mile Rd and Lake Widen intersection to 314 K 2021 2023 Future $476,000 $291,000 $3,912,000 Joe Tate Hazel Rd lanes on Ten Mile and 3/4 lanes on Lake Hazel as per the 2016 CIP. Ten Mile Rd and Construct a multi-lane A 2019-2020 2020 2022-2023 $331,000 $158,000 $3,374,000 Cody Victory Rd roundabout.Includes bridge Homan #1181. US 20/26(Chinden Widen the intersection to add G 2018 2019-2020 2021 $52,000 $133,000 $1,277,000 Brian Blvd)and Curtis Rd a dedicated southbound McCarthy through/right turn lane as per the 2016 CIP. Victory Rd and Five Widen intersection to 6 lanes A,B 2024 2025 Future $0 $0 $2,790,000 Ricardo Mile Rd on Five Mile and 7 lanes on Calderon Victory as per the 2016 CIP. Victory Rd and Locust Construct a multi-lane M 2019-2020 2020-2021 2022 $102,000 $654,000 $3,037,000 Ryan Cutler Grove Rd Roundabout roundabout as per the 2016 CIP.Includes bridge#2116. In-house design. Page 122 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. Es Project Name Project . . ject ® ®® M • •.. •' Cloverdale Rd,Amity Widen Cloverdale Rd to 5 A 2023 2024 2025 $783,000 $1,318,000 $7,736,000 Ricardo Rd/Victory Rd lanes with curb,gutter, Calderon sidewalk and raised bike lanes as per the 2016 CIP. Cloverdale Rd,Lake Widen Cloverdale Rd to 5 B 2023 2024 Future $340,000 $110,000 $2,360,000 Ricardo Hazel Rd/Amity Rd lanes with curb,gutter, Calderon sidewalk and raised bike lanes as per the 2016 CIP. Cloverdale Rd, Widen Cloverdale Rd to 5 B 2018 2018 2019 $0 $0 $0 David Overland Rd/ lanes with curb,gutter, Rader Franklin Rd sidewalk and raised bike lanes as per the 2016 CIP. Project being built in concert with ITD's reconstruction of the Cloverdale Rd 1-84 overpass. Cloverdale Rd, Widen Cloverdale Rd to 5 B 2021 2022-2023 2025 $1,098,000 $1,075,000 $6,807,000 David Victory Rd/Overland lanes with curb,gutter, Rader Rd sidewalk and raised bike lanes from Victory Rd to Overland Rd per the 2016 CIP. Includes restriping of Overland intersection. In-house design. Eagle Rd,Amity Rd/ Widen to 5 lanes with curb, M 2018 2019-2020 2021 $8,000 $315,000 $5,092,000 Ryan Cutler Victory Rd gutter,sidewalk and a Level 3 bike facility as per the 2016 CIP.Includes an enhanced crossing at Rome and a roundabout at Eagle and Zaldia.In-house design. Eagle Rd,Lake Hazel Widen Eagle Rd to 5 lanes M 2021 2022 2023 $406,000 $1,324,000 $5,242,000 Brian Rd/Amity Rd with curb,gutter,sidewalk McCarthy and a Level 3 bike facility from Lake Hazel Rd to Amity Rd as per the 2016 CIP and Bike Master Plan. Includes a roundabout at Eagle Rd and Taconic Dr. Fairview Ave,Locust Widen Fairview Ave to 7lanes M 2020-2021 2021-2022 2023 $223,000 $649,000 $2,180,000 Brian Grove Rd/SH 55 with curb,gutter,sidewalk, McCarthy (Eagle Rd) and buffered bike lanes as per the 2016 CIP. Five Mile Rd,Amity Widen Five Mile to 5 lanes A 2025 Future Future $331,000 $371,000 $3,088,000 Ryan Cutler Rd/Victory Rd with curb,gutter,sidewalk, and a Level 2 bike facility as per the 2016 CIP. Five Mile Rd,Lake Widen Five Mile Rd to 5 A 2024-2025 Future Future $380,000 $782,000 $3,380,000 Ryan Cutler Hazel Rd/Amity Rd lanes,with curb,gutter, sidewalk,and bike lane as per the 2016 CIP. Five Mile Rd, Reconstruct/widen from B 2023 2024-2025 Future $1,204,000 $1,131,000 $10,203,000 Joe Tate Overland Rd/ 2-lanes to 5-lanes. Project Franklin Rd costs do not include any work associated with the ITD Overpass. Page 123 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. Es Project Name Project . . ject Em ®® M • •.. •' Lake Hazel Rd, Widen Lake Hazel Rd to 5 A 2021 2022-2023 2025 $466,000 $807,000 $4,993,000 Ryan Cutler Cloverdale Rd/Five lanes with curb,gutter and Mile Rd multi-use pathways from Cloverdale Rd to Five Mile Rd as per the 2016 CIP and Bike Master Plan. Lake Hazel Rd,Eagle Widen Lake Hazel Rd to 5 A 2022 2023 2024 $509,000 $205,000 $7,606,000 Seth Rd/Cloverdale Rd lanes with curb,gutter and Jarsky multi-use pathways from Eagle Rd to Cloverdale Rd as per the 2016 CIP and Bike Master Plan. Lake Hazel Rd,Five Widen Lake Hazel Rd to 5 A 2022 2023 Future $416,000 $251,000 $4,222,000 Ryan Cutler Mile Rd/Maple Grove lanes with curb,gutter,and Rd multi-use pathways as per the 2016 CIP and Bike Master Plan. Lake Hazel Rd,Maple Widen Lake Hazel Rd to 5 A 2022 2023 Future $332,000 $64,000 $3,665,000 Jason Grove Rd/Cole Rd lanes with curb,gutter,and Tugby multi-use pathways as per the 2016 CIP and Bike Master Plan. Linder Rd,Cherry Ln Widen Linder Rd to 5 lanes M 2025 Future Future $550,000 $1,800,000 $4,397,000 Joe Tate /Ustick Rd with curb,gutter,sidewalk, and Level 2 bike facilities as per the 2016 CIP. Linder Rd,Chinden Widen roadway to 5lanes with A 2024-2025 Future Future $1,396,000 $1,656,000 $17,855,000 Cody Blvd(US 20/26)/SH detached multi-use pathways Homan 44(State St)-South on Linder Rd,from Chinden Phase Blvd to 1,000'N/OArtesian Rd.Right-of-way acquisition will be for the ultimate 7-lanes.The South Phase includes bridges#1078, #2033,and#2034. Linder Rd,Franklin Widen Linder Rd to 5 lanes M 2017-2018 2019 2020 $34,000 $89,000 $787,000 David Rd/Pine Ave with curb,gutter,sidewalk Rader and bike lanes from Franklin Rd to Pine Ave as per the 2016 CIP.Project includes bridge#1120.The UPRR crossing is being upgraded under a separate project concurrently.Carryover construction payments from FY20. Linder Rd,Overland Widen Linder Rd to 5 lanes M Future Future Future $1,181,000 $1,924,000 $13,612,000 Ryan Head Rd/Franklin Rd and construct a new 4-lane I-84 overpass,including curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes as per the 2016 CIP.Project would be a joint project between ACHD and ITD. Linder Rd,SH 44 Widen to 5 lanes,with curb, E 2020-2021 2021-2022 2024 $408,000 $945,000 $6,352,000 Cody (State St)/Floating gutter,and multi-use Homan Feather Rd pathways as per the 2016 CIP. Includes bridges#1021 and #1022. Page 124 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. Es Project Name Project . . ject ® ®® M • •.. •' Locust Grove Rd, Widen to 5 lanes with curb, M 2019 2020-2021 2022 $62,000 $808,000 $5,335,000 Ryan Cutler Victory Rd/Overland gutter,sidewalk and a Level Rd 2 bike facility as per the 2016 CIP.Includes enhanced crossing at Time Zone Dr and bridge#2087. Maple Grove Rd,Amity Widen to 5 lanes with curb, A 2021 2022-2023 2024-2025 $94,000 $2,474,000 $7,080,000 Cody Rd/Victory Rd gutter,sidewalk,and Level 2 Homan bike facility as per the 2016 CIP.Includes bridges#1239. Maple Grove Rd,Lake Widen Maple Grove Rd to A 2024 2025-2026 Future $500,000 $1,846,000 $5,990,000 Cody Hazel Rd/Amity Rd 5-lanes with curb,gutter, Homan sidewalk,and a Level 3 bike facility as per the 2016 CIP. Maple Grove Rd, Widen to 5 lanes with curb, B 2018 2019-2020 2021 $116,000 $1,088,000 $8,010,000 Ryan Cutler Victory Rd/Overland gutter,sidewalk,and a Level Rd 2 bike facility as per the 2016 CIP.Includes bridges #1237,#1238,and#1242 and enhanced crossings at Targee and Maple Grove Elementary. Meridian Rd,Cherry Widen to 5 lanes with curb, M 2016-2017 2018-2019 2020 $118,000 $318,000 $3,187,000 Brian Ln/Ustick Rd gutter,sidewalk,and bike McCarthy lanes as per the 2016 CIP. Includes bridges#2045 and #126X and enhanced crossings at James and Woodbury. Carryover const payments from FY20. Orchard St Realign/widen Orchard St to 5 B 2019-2021 i 2022-2023 2024 $786,000 $1,505,000 $17,232,000 David Realignment,Gowen Rd lanes with curb,gutter, Rader /Victory Rd sidewalk,and a Level 3 bike facility as per the 2016 CIP. State St,36th St/ Widen State St to 7 lanes B Future Future Future $370,000 $720,000 $4,484,000 Ricardo 27th St with HOV/transit lanes,curb, Calderon gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes as per the State St TTOP and the 2016 CIP. This project may include an access management component. State St,Collister Widen State St to 7 lanes B Future Future Future $280,000 $540,000 $12,400,000 Ricardo Dr/36th St with HOV/transit lanes,curb, Calderon gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes as per the State St TTOP and the 2016 CIP. This project may include an access management component. State St,Pierce Park Widen State St to 7 lanes B,G Future Future Future $520,000 $710,000 $6,452,000 Ricardo Ln/Collister Dr with HOV/transit lanes,curb, Calderon gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes as per the State St TTOP and the 2016 CIP. This project may include an access management component. Page 125 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. Es Project Name Project . . ject ® ®® M • •.. •' Ten Mile Rd,McMillan Widen Ten Mile Rd to 5 lanes M 2018 2019 2020 $0 $781,000 $2,027,000 David Rd/Chinden Blvd(US with curb,gutter,sidewalk Rader 20/26) and bike lanes as per the 2016 CIP.Includes an enhanced pedestrian crossing at Malta.In-house design.To be built by development under a STARS agreement. Ten Mile Rd,Ustick Widen to 5 lanes with curb, M 2018-2019 2019 2020 $81,000 $745,000 $3,002,000 David Rd/McMillan Rd gutter,sidewalk and bike Rader lanes as per the 2016 CIP. Includes bridges#1103 and #2044,enhanced crossings at Tesino and the pedestrian path south of Vicenza, parking area for Meridian Pathway(Cost share with the City of Meridian). Ten Mile Rd,Victory Widen to 5 lanes with curb, A,M 2019 2020-2021 2022-2023 $37,000 $155,000 $2,988,000 Cody Rd/Overland Rd gutter,sidewalk and a Level Homan 3 bike facility as per the 2016 CIP.In-house design. Ustick Rd,Ten Mile Widen Ustick Rd to 5 lanes M 2022 2023 2025 $392,000 $140,000 $3,185,000 Joe Tate Rd/Linder Rd with curb,gutter,sidewalk, and Level 3 bike facility as per the 2016 CIP.Concept design will further clarify project scope. Page 126 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. Program Federal Estimated Cost Project Project Name Project Description Manager Federal Aid Capital Pavement rehabilitation and B 2019-2020 N/A 2021 $203,000 $0 $4,804,000 Brian Maintenance(2021)- upgrade of adjacent McCarthy Phase 1 pedestrian ramps on identified arterial and collector road segments. Projects selected as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Federal Aid Capital Pavement rehabilitation and B 2019-2020 N/A 2021 $185,000 $0 $1,994,000 Joe Tate Maintenance(2021)- upgrade of adjacent Phase 2 pedestrian ramps on identified arterial and collector road segments. Projects selected as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Federal Aid Capital Pavement rehabilitation and B 2019-2020 N/A 2021 $88,000 $0 $773,000 David Maintenance(2021)- upgrade of adjacent Rader Phase 3 pedestrian ramps on identified arterial and collector road segments. Projects selected as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program.Includes improvement to storm drain infrastructure. Pavement Preservation Pavement rehabilitation and B 2020 N/A 2022 $363,000 $0 $5,427,000 Brian &ADA(2022)-Phase 1 upgrade of adjacent McCarthy pedestrian ramps on identified arterial and collector road segments. Projects selected as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Project supplemented with federal-aid. Pavement Preservation Pavement rehabilitation and B 2020 N/A 2022 $9,000 $0 $2,326,000 Brian &ADA(2022)-Phase 2 upgrade of adjacent McCarthy pedestrian ramps on identified arterial and collector road segments. Projects selected as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Project supplemented with federal-aid. Pavement Preservation Pavement rehabilitation and B 2020 N/A 2022 $0 $0 $300,000 Ryan Cutler &ADA(2022)-Phase 3 upgrade of adjacent pedestrian ramps on identified arterial and collector road segments. Projects selected as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Eligible for federal-aid. Page 127 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. DescriptionEstimated Cost ject Project Name Project ®® •' • � ® Ma nager Roadway and ADA Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2021 N/A 2023 $529,000 $0 $5,291,000 Seth Improvements(2023)- upgrade of adjacent Jarsky Part 1 pedestrian ramps on identified arterial and collector road segments. Projects selected as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Project supplemented with federal-aid. Location TBD. Roadway and ADA Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2021 N/A 2023 $227,000 $0 $2,268,000 Chris Improvements(2023)- upgrade of adjacent Dayley Part 2 pedestrian ramps on identified arterial and collector road segments. Projects selected as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Project supplemented with federal-aid. Location TBD. Roadway and ADA Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2021 N/A 2023 $80,000 $0 $300,000 Seth Improvements(2023)- upgrade of adjacent Jarsky Part 3 pedestrian ramps on identified arterial and collector road segments. Projects selected as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Eligible for federal-aid. Location TBD. Roadway and ADA Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2022 N/A 2024 $487,000 $0 $5,072,000 Ryan Cutler Improvements(2024)- upgrade of adjacent Part 1 pedestrian ramps on identified arterial and collector road segments. Projects selected as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Project supplemented with federal-aid. Location TBD. Roadway and ADA Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2022 N/A 2024 $217,000 $0 $2,174,000 Cody Improvements(2024)- upgrade of adjacent Homan Part 2 pedestrian ramps on identified arterial and collector road segments. Projects selected as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Project supplemented with federal-aid. Location TBD. Roadway and ADA Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2022 N/A 2024 $80,000 $0 $300,000 Brian Improvements(2024)- upgrade of adjacent McCarthy Part 3 pedestrian ramps on identified arterial and collector road segments. Projects selected as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Eligible for federal-aid. Location TBD. Page 128 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. DescriptionEstimated Cost ject Project Name Project ®® •' • � ® Ma nager Roadway and ADA Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2023 N/A 2025 $504,000 $0 $5,043,000 Ricardo Improvements(2025)- upgrade of adjacent Calderon Part 1 pedestrian ramps on identified arterial and collector road segments. Projects selected as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Project supplemented with federal-aid. Location TBD. Roadway and ADA Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2023 N/A 2025 $216,000 $0 $2,161,000 Ricardo Improvements(2025)- upgrade of adjacent Calderon Part 2 pedestrian ramps on identified arterial and collector road segments. Projects selected as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Project supplemented with federal-aid. Location TBD. Roadway and ADA Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2023 N/A 2025 $80,000 $0 $300,000 Ricardo Improvements(2025)- upgrade of adjacent Calderon Part 3 pedestrian ramps on identified arterial and collector road segments. Projects selected as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Eligible for federal-aid. Location TBD. Roadway and ADA Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2024 N/A 2026 $504,000 $0 $5,043,000 Ricardo Improvements(2026)- upgrade of adjacent Calderon Part 1 pedestrian ramps on identified arterial and collector road segments. Projects selected as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Project supplemented with federal-aid. Location TBD. Roadway and ADA Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2024 N/A 2026 $216,000 $0 $2,161,000 Ricardo Improvements(2026)- upgrade of adjacent Calderon Part 2 pedestrian ramps on identified arterial and collector road segments. Projects selected as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Project supplemented with federal-aid. Location TBD. Roadway and ADA Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2024 N/A 2026 $80,000 $0 $300,000 Ricardo Improvements(2026)- upgrade of adjacent Calderon Part 3 pedestrian ramps on identified arterial and collector road segments. Projects selected as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Eligible for federal-aid. Location TBD. Page 129 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. DescriptionEstimated Cost ject Project Name Project ®® •' • � ® Ma nager Roadway and ADA Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2025 N/A 2027 $504,000 $0 $5,043,000 Ricardo Improvements(2027)- upgrade of adjacent Calderon Part 1 pedestrian ramps on identified arterial and collector road segments. Projects selected as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program.Project supplemented with federal-aid. Location TBD. Roadway and ADA Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2025 N/A 2027 $216,000 $0 $2,161,000 Ricardo Improvements(2027)- upgrade of adjacent Calderon Part 2 pedestrian ramps on identified arterial and collector road segments. Projects selected as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program.Project supplemented with federal-aid. Location TBD. Roadway and ADA Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2025 N/A 2027 $80,000 $0 $300,000 Ricardo Improvements(2027)- upgrade of adjacent Calderon Part 3 pedestrian ramps on identified arterial and collector road segments. Projects selected as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program.Eligible for federal-aid. Location TBD. Page 130 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. Es ject Project Name Project . . MEHMMEN® • •.. 11th St Maintenance Complete roadway maintenance B 2020-2021 N/A 2022 $82,000 $0 $1,540,000 David and Bikeway,State St on 11th St,from Fort St to Rader /Heron St Heron St and implement the 11 th St Bikeway(State to Heron).Includes enhanced pedestrian crossings(RRFB) at Fort and 11th,Hays and 11th,and Hays and 12th. Arterial&Collector Pavement rehabilitation and A 2020 N/A 2021 $23,000 $0 $2,000,000 Chris Capital Maintenance pedestrian ramps on Dayley (2021)-HB312 Project identified arterial and collector roads as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program.Project funded through House Bill 312 funding.In-house design. Arterial&Collector Pavement rehabilitation and A,K,M 2021 N/A 2022 $50,000 $0 $1,138,000 Chris Capital Maintenance pedestrian ramps on Dayley (2022)-HB312 Project identified arterial and collector roads as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program.Project funded through House Bill 312 funding.In-house design. Arterial&Collector Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2022 N/A 2023 $110,000 $0 $1,816,000 Jason Capital Maintenance pedestrian ramps on Tugby (2023)-HB312 Project identified arterial and collector roads as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program.Project funded through House Bill 312 funding. Arterial&Collector Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2023 N/A 2024 $230,000 $0 $2,083,000 Scott Capital Maintenance pedestrian ramps on Forrey (2024)-HB312 Project identified arterial and collector roads as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program.Project funded through House Bill 312 funding. Arterial&Collector Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2023 N/A 2025 $110,000 $0 $1,000,000 Scott Capital Maintenance pedestrian ramps on Forrey (2025)-HB312 Project identified arterial and collector roads as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program.Project funded through House Bill 312 funding. Arterial&Collector Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2024 N/A Future $110,000 $0 $1,000,000 Scott Capital Maintenance pedestrian ramps on Forrey (2026)-HB312 Project identified arterial and collector roads as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program.Project funded through House Bill 312 funding.In-house design. Page 131 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. Es ject Project Name Project . . MOMMMES M • •.. Bannock St Complete roadway maintenance B 2022 N/A 2024 $75,000 $3,000 $617,000 Joe Tate Maintenance and on Bannock St,from the flume Bikeway,Broadway Ave to Coston St and implement /Greenbelt the Bannock St Bikeway(East Phase). Capital Maintenance Funding set-aside for TBD N/A N/A N/A $0 $0 $1,200,000 Ricardo Enhancement Set-Aside maintenance project Calderon enhancements.May be used for interim pedestrian facilities,ADA sidewalk repairs,drainage improvements,enhanced crossings identified in a plan,bikeway signage,or minor pavement widening to add turn lanes. Cul-de-Sac(2021)- Rehabilitate cul-de-sacs in A,B,K,M N/A N/A 2021 $0 $0 $250,000 David HB312 Project Maintenance Zone 2 as part of Rader ACHD's Pavement Management Program.Project funded through House Bill 312 funding. Cul-de-Sac(2022)- Rehabilitate cul-de-sacs in A,B,K,M N/A N/A 2022 $0 $0 $400,000 Scott HB312 Project Maintenance Zone 3 as part of Forrey ACHD's Pavement Management Program.Project funded through House Bill 312 funding. Cul-de-Sac(2023)- Rehabilitate cul-de-sacs in B N/A N/A 2023 $0 $0 $400,000 Scott HB312 Project Maintenance Zone 4 as part of Forrey ACHD's Pavement Management Program.Project funded through House Bill 312 funding. Cul-de-Sac(2024)- Rehabilitate cul-de-sacs in A,B,G N/A N/A 2024 $0 $0 $400,000 Scott HB312 Project Maintenance Zone 5 as part of Forrey ACHD's Pavement Management Program.Project funded through House Bill 312 funding. Cul-de-Sac(2025)- Rehabilitate cul-de-sacs in A,B,E,M,S N/A N/A 2025 $0 $0 $400,000 Scott HB312 Project Maintenance Zone 6 as part of Forrey ACHD's Pavement Management Program.Project funded through House Bill 312 funding. Downtown Boise Rehabilitate select streets B 2018 N/A 2020-2021 $0 $0 $164,000 Cody Implementation(2019) in downtown Boise as per the Homan -HB312 Project Downtown Boise Implementation Plan.Includes an accessible pedestrian signal at 16th St and Idaho St.Project funded through House Bill 312 funding.Carryover from FY2019 construction project. Page 132 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. Es Project Name Project . . ject ® ®®EN® • •.. Downtown Boise Perform road rehabilitation B 2020-2021 2020 2021-2022 $400,000 $0 $5,574,000 Cody Implementation(2020) of select streets in downtown Homan -HB312 Project Boise in concert with CCDC and other projects as per the Downtown Boise Implementation Plan.Project funded through House Bill 312 funding. Includes enhanced pedestrian crossings at State and 12th and State and 14th. Maintenance Crack Seal cracks in arterial and B N/A N/A 2021 $0 $0 $405,000 Chris Seal(2021)-HB312 collector roadways in Dayley Project Preventative Maintenance Zone 4 as part ofACHD's Pavement Management Program.Project funded through House Bill 312 funding. Maintenance Crack Seal cracks in arterial and A,B,G N/A N/A 2022 $0 $0 $325,000 Jason Seal(2022)-HB312 collector roadways in Tugby Project Preventative Maintenance Zone 5 as part ofACHD's Pavement Management Program.Project funded through House Bill 312 funding. Maintenance Crack Seal cracks in arterial and A,B,E,M,S N/A N/A 2023 $0 $0 $325,000 Scott Seal(2023)-HB312 collector roadways in Forrey Project Preventative Maintenance Zone 6 as part ofACHD's Pavement Management Program.Project funded through House Bill 312 funding. Maintenance Crack Seal cracks in arterial and B,G N/A N/A 2024 $0 $0 $325,000 Scott Seal(2024)-HB312 collector roadways in Forrey Project Preventative Maintenance Zone 1 as part ofACHD's Pavement Management Program.Project funded through House Bill 312 funding. Maintenance Crack Seal cracks in arterial and A,B,K,M N/A N/A 2025 $0 $0 $325,000 Scott Seal(2025)-HB312 collector roadways in Forrey Project Preventative Maintenance Zone 2 as part ofACHD's Pavement Management Program.Project funded through House Bill 312 funding. Microseal(2021)- Microseal roadways as part of TBD N/A N/A 2021 $0 $0 $300,000 Brian HB312 Project ACHD's Pavement Management McCarthy Program.Project funded through House Bill 312 funding. Microseal(2022)- Microseal roadways as part of TBD N/A N/A 2022 $0 $0 $400,000 Scott HB312 Project ACHD's Pavement Management Forrey Program.Project funded through House Bill 312 funding. Page 133 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. DescriptionEstimated Cost ject Project Name Project ®® •' • � ® Ma nager Residential Capital Pavement rehabilitation and B 2019 N/A 2020-2021 $12,000 $0 $246,000 Cody Maintenance(2020)- pedestrian ramps on Homan HB312 Project residential streets identified as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Project funded through House Bill 312 funding.In-house design. Residential Capital Pavement rehabilitation and M 2019 N/A 2021 $0 $0 $0 David Maintenance(2021)- pedestrian ramps on Rader HB312 Project residential streets identified as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Project funded through House Bill 312 funding.In-house design. Residential Capital Pavement rehabilitation and M 2020 N/A 2022 $41,000 $0 $4,968,000 Ryan Cutler Maintenance(2022)- pedestrian ramps on HB312 Project residential streets identified as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Project funded through House Bill 312 funding.In-house design. Residential Capital Pavement rehabilitation and A,B,M 2021 N/A 2023 $110,000 $0 $5,520,000 Seth Maintenance(2023)- pedestrian ramps on Jarsky HB312 Project residential streets identified as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Project funded through House Bill 312 funding.In-house design. Residential Capital Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2022 N/A 2024 $110,000 $0 $5,503,000 Jason Maintenance(2024)- pedestrian ramps on Tugby HB312 Project residential streets identified as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Project funded through House Bill 312 funding. Residential Capital Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2023 N/A 2025 $597,000 $0 $5,503,000 Scott Maintenance(2025)- pedestrian ramps on Forrey HB312 Project residential streets identified as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Project funded through House Bill 312 funding. Residential Capital Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2024 N/A 2026 $597,000 $0 $5,503,000 Scott Maintenance(2026)- pedestrian ramps on Forrey HB312 Project residential streets identified as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Project funded through House Bill 312 funding. Residential Capital Pavement rehabilitation and TBD 2025 N/A 2027 $597,000 $0 $5,503,000 Scott Maintenance(2027)- pedestrian ramps on Forrey HB312 Project residential streets identified as part of ACHD's Pavement Management Program. Project funded through House Bill 312 funding. Page 134 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. Page 135 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. Programs Bikeways Estimated Cost Project Project Name Project Description = Manager Bikeway Signage Install wayfinding and B N/A N/A 2021 $0 $0 $200,000 Edinson (2021)-Phase 1 bikeway signage on along Bautista identified bikeways as per the Bike Master Plan. Includes the Columbus St Bikeway,Canal St Bikeway, and the Latah St Bikeway. Bikeway Signage(2022) Install wayfinding and B,G N/A N/A 2022 $0 $0 $200,000 Edinson bikeway signage on along Bautista identified bikeways as per the Bike Master Plan. Includes Breneman St,23rd St,18th St,Ellis St, Ressiguie St,Pleasanton St, Main St-Fairview Ave,Protest Hill Bikeway,and Orchard Hill Bikeway. Bikeway Signage(2023) Install wayfinding and B N/A N/A 2023 $0 $0 $200,000 Edinson bikeway signage on along Bautista identified bikeways as per the Bike Master Plan. Includes the Chinden-McMillan Bikeway(Phase 1),Bennington Way/Mitchell St and the Mitchell St Bikeway. Bikeway Signage(2024) Install wayfinding and B,M N/A N/A 2024 $0 $0 $200,000 Edinson bikeway signage on along Bautista identified bikeways as per the Bike Master Plan. Includes the Records St Bikeway,Granger St Bikeway, and McMillan-Ustick Bikeway (Phases 1 &2). Bikeway Signage(2025) Install wayfinding and B,G N/A N/A 2025 $0 $0 $200,000 Edinson bikeway signage on along Bautista identified bikeways as per the Bike Master Plan. Includes the Manitou Ave Bikeway and the 43rd St Bikeway Connection. Columbia Village Improve select streets B 2023 2023 2024 $50,000 $3,000 $192,000 Seth Bikeway,Hwy 21/ (Holcomb,Yamhill,Lake Jarsky Boise Ave Forest,Grand Forest)in Columbia Village as a bikeway to include wayfinding, signage,crossings,and markings as per the Bike Master Plan. Columbus St Bikeway, Improve Columbus St as a B 2022 2022 2023 $20,000 $6,000 $103,000 Ryan Cutler Victory Rd/Kootenai bikeway to include wayfinding St and bikeway signage and markings as per the Bike Master Plan and the Central Bench Neighborhood Plan. Page 136 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. Es Project Narne Project . . ject Em ®® M • •.. •' Garden St Bikeway, Improve Garden St as a B 2024 2024 2025 $25,000 $2,000 $162,000 Ryan Head Albion St/Greenbelt bikeway to include wayfinding and bikeway signage,enhanced crossing at Franklin Rd,and markings as per the Bike Master Plan and the Central Bench Neighborhood Plan. Hollandale-Targee Improve select streets B,M 2022-2023 2023 2024 $55,000 $2,000 $380,000 Ryan Head Bikeway,Locust Grove between Overland and Victory, Rd/Targee St including Hollandale,K Bar T,and Targee,as a continuous bikeway as per the Southwest Boise Neighborhood Plan and the Bike Master Plan. Linder-Meridian Improve as a bikeway select M 2023-2024 2024 2025 $55,000 $2,000 $380,000 Ryan Head Bikeway,Pine Ave/ streets between Linder Rd and Temple Dr Meridian Rd to include wayfinding,bikeway signage, enhanced crossings at Ustick and McMillan,and markings as per the Bike Master Plan. Nez Perce St Bikeway, Improve Nez Perce St as a B 2022 2023 2023 $51,000 $4,000 $209,000 Cody Orchard St/Columbus low-stress bikeway to include Homan St wayfinding and bikeway signage,enhanced crossings, and markings as per the Bike Master Plan and the Central Bench Neighborhood Plan. Northwest Boise Improve select streets in B 2022 2022 2023 $25,000 $3,000 $132,000 Jason Bikeway,Horseshoe Northwest Boise as a bikeway Tugby Bend Rd/36th St to include wayfinding, signage,enhanced crossings, and markings as per the Bike Master Plan. Pleasanton Ave Improve Pleasanton Ave as a B 2022-2023 2023 2024 $41,000 $3,000 $107,000 Joe Tate Bikeway,Greenbelt/ bikeway to include wayfinding 23rd St and bikeway signage and markings as per the Bike Master Plan. School Ave Bikeway, Improve School Ave as a K 2023-2024 2024 2025 $41,000 $2,000 $55,000 Ryan Head King Rd/Deer Flat Rd bikeway to include wayfinding and bikeway signage and markings as per the Bike Master Plan. Shoshone St Bikeway, Improve Shoshone St as a B 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 $147,000 $20,000 $80,000 Seth Canal St/Capital bikeway network to include Jarsky Blvd wayfnding,bikeway signage, a mini roundabout,enhanced connections at Overland,and markings as per the Shoshone Bikeway Concept. Page 137 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item ilnllty Projects Estimated Cost ==��= Project Project Name Project Description E Manager 32nd St,US 20/26 Construct curb,gutter, G 2021 2022 2023 $90,000 $19,000 $593,000 Jason (Chinden Blvd)/Clay sidewalk,swales,landscaped Tugby St bulb outs,and pedestrian scale illumination on 32nd from Chinden to Clay in partnership with Garden City and Garden City URA. 33rd St,US 20/26 Construct curb,gutter, G 2024 2025 Future $183,000 $144,000 $715,000 Ricardo (Chinden Blvd)/ sidewalk,bulb outs,and bike Calderon Greenbelt facilities on 33rd St from Chinden Blvd to the Greenbelt. Allumbaugh St, Complete curb,gutter,and B 2022 2023 2024 $135,000 $276,000 $667,000 Ricardo Fairview Ave/ sidewalk on the west side of Calderon Northview St Allumbaugh St,between Fairview Ave and Northview St. Amity Rd and Install pedestrian ramps and A 2020 2020 2020 $0 $0 $0 Ryan Cloverdale Rd pathways at the intersection Fisher of Amity Rd and Cloverdale Rd to correct existing deficient pedestrian connections. 2020 Commission Directive Project. Avenue C,Main St/ Install curb,gutter, K 2021 2021 2022 $30,000 $4,000 $276,000 Seth 04th St sidewalk,and angled parking Jarsky on both sides of Avenue C from Main St to 04th St as per the Kuna Downtown Corridor Plan. Avenue D,Main St/ Install curb,gutter, K 2022 2022 2024 $35,000 $4,000 $153,000 Seth 04th St sidewalk,and angled parking Jarsky on both sides of Avenue D from Main St to 04th St as per the Kuna Downtown Corridor Plan. Broadway Ave,West Construct sidewalk on the M 2023 2024 2025 $113,000 $2,000 $447,000 Ricardo 08th St/West 04th St south side of Broadway,from Calderon West 07th to West 04th as per the Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Plan.Includes pedestrian railing on the back side of sidewalk where it crosses Nine Mile Creek. Clay St,34th St/ Construct curb,gutter, G 2021 2022 2024 $120,000 $13,000 $655,000 David 32nd St sidewalk,swales,landscaped Rader bulb outs,and illumination on Clay from 34th to 32nd in partnership with Garden City and Garden City URA. Clay St,37th St/ Construct curb,detached G 2022 2023 2025 $227,000 $124,000 $1,039,000 David 34th St;34th St, sidewalk,swales,landscaped Rader Chinden Blvd/Clay St bulb outs at intersections and illumination on Clay St, from 37th St to 34th St and on 34nd St,from Chinden Blvd to Clay St. Coston St,Bannock St Complete sidewalk on the west B 2022 2022 2023 $51,000 $4,000 $276,000 Brian /Franklin St side of Coston,from Bannock McCarthy to Franklin as per the East End Neighborhood Plan. Page 138 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item ilnllty Projects Estimated Cost roject Ma Project Name Project Description M_■ ■ . nager Division Ave, Construct curb,gutter and B 2019-2020 N/A 2021 $40,000 $0 $253,000 Chris Highland St/Hale St sidewalk on the east side of Dayley Division Avenue.2020 Commission Directive Project. East 03rd St, Construct streetscape M 2022 2023 2025 $340,000 $287,000 $1,353,000 Ryan Cutler Franklin Rd/Carlton improvements,including curb, St gutter,sidewalk,and improved UPRR crossing,from Franklin to Carlton as per the Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Plan. East 2 1/2 St, Construct sidewalk on the M 2024 Future Future $77,000 $74,000 $242,000 Ricardo Carlton Ave/ east side of East 2 1/2,from Calderon Fairview Ave Carlton to Fairview as per the Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Eckert Rd and Arrow Install crosswalk,curb ramps B 2020 2020 2020 $0 $0 $0 Cody Junction Dr and lighting to improve Homan Pedestrian Crossing pedestrian connectivity and safety at the intersection of Eckert Rd and Arrow Junction Dr.In-house design. Five Mile Rd and Install a pedestrian hybrid A 2020 N/A 2020 $45,000 $0 $17,000 Jason Seneca Dr Pedestrian beacon(PHB)at Five Mile Rd Tugby Crossing and Seneca Dr. Install ADA-compliant ramps as necessary. 2020 Commission Directive Project. Five Mile Rd and Install an enhanced B 2020 N/A 2021 $34,000 $4,000 $294,000 Jason Smoke Ranch Dr pedestrian crossing at Five Tugby Pedestrian Crossing Mile Rd and Smoke Ranch Dr. 2020 Commission Directive Project Floating Feather Rd, Construct sidewalk on the S 2021 2022 2023 $20,000 $48,000 $235,000 Jason Brandon Rd/Hornback north side of Floating Tugby Ave Feather Rd from Brandon Rd to Hornback Ave. Holcomb Rd,Mimosa Construct sidewalk on the B 2016 2017 2020-2021 $0 $0 $0 David Way/Amity Rd east side of Holcomb Rd from Rader Mendota to Amity.Includes bike lane and wayfinding signage from Amity to Mimosa and an enhanced crossing at Amity. Horseshoe Bend Rd and Construct curb ramps and E 2022 2022 2023 $59,000 $3,000 $132,000 Joe Tate Floating Feather Rd sidewalk connections at Horseshoe Bend and Rd and Floating Feather Rd to improve pedestrian access and safety. Horseshoe Bend Rd and Install curb ramps,a striped E 2020 2020 2020 $0 S1,000 $15,000 Jason Shadowview St pedestrian crossing,and Tugby Pedestrian Crossing refuge island on Horseshoe Bend Rd on the north side of Shadowview St.In-house design. Page 139 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item ilnllty Projects Estimated Cost Project Name Project■ . . ® ==��= Project .. Horseshoe Bend Rd, Construct a pathway on the B,E 2021 2022 2023 $125,000 $276,000 $653,000 Joe Tate State St/Hill Rd east side of Horseshoe Bend Rd as per the NW Boise Neighborhood Plan.Includes precast bridge,pedestrian crossing(Utahna St),and bikeway signage. Liberty St Sidewalk Complete sidewalk on the east B 2022 2022 2023 $35,000 $3,000 $483,000 Brian and Bikeway,Douglas side of Liberty St,between McCarthy St/Denton St Douglas St and Denton St as per the Central Bench Neighborhood Plan.Install bikeway signage between Franklin Rd and Emerald St. Locust Grove Rd and Install an enhanced M 2022 2022 2023 $71,000 $3,000 $334,000 Ryan Cutler Palermo Dr Pedestrian pedestrian crossing Crossing (pedestrian hybrid beacon) across Locust Grove Rd at Palermo Dr. Locust Grove Rd and Install an enhanced M 2022 2022 2023 $40,000 $3,000 $160,000 Chris Woodbridge Dr pedestrian crossing Dayley Pedestrian Crossing (pedestrian hybrid beacon) across Locust Grove,between Woodbridge and Watertower. Main St and King St Install an enhanced M 2023 2024 2025 $32,000 $2,000 $111,000 Ricardo Pedestrian Crossing pedestrian crossing(RRFB) Calderon across Main St at King St. Maple Grove Rd and Install an enhanced B 2022 2023 2024 $51,000 $11,000 $184,000 Joe Tate Edna St Pedestrian pedestrian crossing Crossing (pedestrian hybrid beacon) across Maple Grove Rd at Edna St as per the West Bench Neighborhood Plan. McMillan Rd,Cortana Construct pathway with M 2024 2025 Future $76,000 $87,000 $173,000 Ricardo Way/Goddard Creek extruded curb on the north Calderon way side of McMillan between Cortana and Goddard Creek. Overland Rd and Install an enhanced crossing B 2020 2020 2021 $44,000 $1,000 $265,000 Joe Tate Phillippi St (pedestrian hybrid beacon) Pedestrian Crossing across Overland Rd at Phillippi St as per the Central Bench Neighborhood Plan.In-house design. Phillippi St,Malad Complete curb,gutter and B 2016 2017 2021 $15,000 $0 $504,000 Joe Tate St/Targee St sidewalk from Malad to Targee as per the Central Bench Neighborhood Plan. Phillippi St,Targee Construct curb,gutter,and B 2017 2019 2021 $5,000 $24,000 $901,000 David St/Overland Rd sidewalk on the east side of Rader Phillippi from Targee to Overland as per the Central Bench Neighborhood Plan. Includes partial road rehabilitation.In-house design. Page 140 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item ilnllty Projects Estimated Cost ==��= Project Project Name Project Description E Manager Roosevelt St,Rose Construct sidewalk on the B 2016 2017 2022 $50,000 $20,000 $1,325,000 Brian Hill St/Emerald St west side of Roosevelt from McCarthy Rose Hill to Emerald as per the Central Bench Neighborhood Plan.Project includes roadway rehabilitation. Taft St,Sycamore Dr Install curb,gutter and B 2025 Future Future $363,000 $115,000 $1,525,000 Ricardo /36th St sidewalk on both sides of the Calderon roadway. US 20/26(Chinden Federal aid project to G 2021 N/A 2023 $55,000 $1,000 $159,000 Brian Blvd)and 43rd St install an enhanced crossing McCarthy Pedestrian Crossing on Chinden Blvd at 43rd St. Victory Rd and Install an enhanced crossing M 2018 N/A 2020 $5,000 $0 $17,000 Jason Standing Timber Ave and curb ramps on Victory Rd Tugby Pedestrian Crossing at Standing Timber Ave. Vista Ave and Nez Install an enhanced crossing B 2020 2020 2021 $49,000 $1,000 $251,000 Chris Perce St Pedestrian on Vista at Nez Perce, Dayley Crossing including bike push buttons. Includes relocation of bus stops closer to Nez Perce from Spaulding in coordination with Valley Regional Transit. Western Heritage Construct roadway shoulder A 2022-2024 N/A 2024-2025 $20,000 $0 $5,394,000 Ryan Cutler Byway(Swan Falls along Swan Falls between Rd),Initial Point/ Initial Point to the southern southern terminus terminus of the roadway. Page 141 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. evelopment Estimated Cost roject Me Project Name Project Description ■ ■ . nager 05th St and 06th St, Complete a 1-way to 2-way B 2018-2019 N/A Future $40,000 $0 $3,006,000 Cody Myrtle St/Fort St, conversion of 05th St and Homan Two-Way Conversion 06th St in downtown Boise. 05th St and Fort St Improve intersection for B Future Future Future $175,000 $0 $0 Ricardo and Hays St pedestrians,bicyclists,and Calderon motorists.Project concept will determine the scope of intersection improvements. Aikens St,Eagle Rd/ Extend Aikens St,east to E 2018-2019 2019-2020 2023-2024 $94,000 $490,000 $1,411,000 Cody 02nd St 02nd St from its current Homan terminus and complete the street section with curb, gutter,and sidewalk as per the Eagle Rd and State St Intersection Concept Study. Broadway Ave/Avenue B Modify intersection as per B Future Future Future $198,000 $801,000 $2,994,000 Ricardo and Idaho St/Warm the Broadway Ave/Avenue B Calderon Springs Ave and Idaho St/Warm Springs Ave Concept Design.Donna Larsen Park Pathway and pedestrian crossings being completed under a separate project. Pine Ave,Meridian Rd Reconstruct roadway including M 2016 2017 2018-2020 $28,000 $0 $60,000 Cody /Locust Grove Rd- intersection widening,curb, Homan Roadway gutter,sidewalk and bike lanes in partnership with Meridian and the Meridian Development Corporation. Project includes Pine Bridge #1126.FY2020 funding will complete basin re-vegetation. Page 142 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. Iks Estimated Cost ==��= Project Project Name Project Description E Manager Safe Sidewalk Program Repair existing damaged B 2020 N/A 2021 $0 $0 $1,600,000 Ryan (2021) sidewalk,replace Fisher non-compliant curb ramps,and fill in small sidewalk gaps to high priority locations identified in ACHD's Americans with Disability Act Transition Plan.Project includes the area of Fairview Ave to Northview St, Allumbaugh St/Curtis Rd. In-house design. Safe Sidewalk Program Repair existing damaged B N/A N/A 2022 $0 $0 $1,600,000 Ryan (2022) sidewalk,replace Fisher non-compliant curb ramps,and fill in small sidewalk gaps to high priority locations identified in ACHD's Americans with Disability Act Transition Plan.Project includes the area of Edna St to McMillan Rd,Shamrock Ave /Five Mile Rd. Safe Sidewalk Program Repair existing damaged TBD N/A N/A 2023 $0 $0 $1,600,000 Ryan (2023) sidewalk,replace Fisher non-compliant curb ramps,and fill in small sidewalk gaps to high priority locations identified in ACHD's Americans with Disability Act Transition Plan. Safe Sidewalk Program Repair existing damaged TBD N/A N/A 2024 $0 $0 $1,600,000 Ryan (2024) sidewalk,replace Fisher non-compliant curb ramps,and fill in small sidewalk gaps to high priority locations identified in ACHD's Americans with Disability Act Transition Plan. Safe Sidewalk Program Repair existing damaged TBD N/A N/A 2025 $0 $0 $1,600,000 Ryan (2025) sidewalk,replace Fisher non-compliant curb ramps,and fill in small sidewalk gaps to high priority locations identified inACHD's Americans with Disability Act Transition Plan. Page 143 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. stration Fee Projects Estimated Cost roject Me Project Name Project Description = nager ■ ■ 09th St and Install an enhanced B 2022 2022 2023 $50,000 $1,000 $141,000 Chris Washington St pedestrian crossing Dayley Pedestrian Crossing (rectangular rapid flashing beacon)at 09th St and Washington St as per the North Boise Neighborhood Plan. 13th St Traffic Implement components of the B 2020-2021 N/A 2021-2022 $44,000 $1,000 $719,000 Seth Calming(Phase 1), 13th St Traffic Calming Jarsky Fort St/Hill Rd Concept Study,including bulbouts at select intersections and an enhanced pedestrian crossing (rectangular rapid flashing beacon)of 13th St at Resseguie St. 28th St,Hazel St/ Construct bulb-outs at B 2019 2019 2020-2021 $4,000 $0 $247,000 David Irene St corners of the 28th St Rader intersections of Irene St, Bella St,and Hazel St to provide traffic calming. 38th St,Bush Ave/ Extend roadway and complete B 2019-2020 2020 2022 $30,000 $0 $369,000 Jason Sunset Ave sidewalk on both sides of Tugby 38th St from Bush Ave to Sunset Ave.Due to roadway elevation differences, project will require reconstruction of portions of the roadway. Bogart Ln,SH 44 Construct an asphalt pathway B 2019-2020 2020 2021 $9,000 $27,000 $252,000 Chris (State St)/Sloan St with raised curb on the east Dayley side of Bogart from Pocono to Caswell and curb,gutter and sidewalk on the east side at Sloan as per the NW Boise Plan.In-house design. Boise Ave and Linden Install an enhanced crossing B 2022 2022 2023 $35,000 $5,000 $122,000 David St Pedestrian Crossing (rectangular rapid flashing Rader beacon)on Boise Ave at Linden St as per the Southeast Boise Neighborhood Plan. Cassia St Bikeway and Improve Cassia St as a B 2018-2019 2020 2021 $397,000 $8,000 $3,486,000 Brian Pedestrian bikeway from Franklin to McCarthy Improvements Kootenai and sidewalk from Franklin Park to Curtis and Latah to Shoshone.Includes pavement rehabilitation, raised intersection at Shoshone,pedestrian bridge at Cassia Park,and enhance pedestrian crossings. Cherry Ln and Install an enhanced crossing M 2019 2019 2020 $0 $9,000 $16,000 Jason Meridian Library (pedestrian hybrid beacon)on Tugby Pedestrian Crossing Cherry Lane between West 8th and Linder.This will require relocation of the existing school zone beacon to the west. Page 144 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. stration Fee Projects Estimated Cost roject Me Project Name Project Description = nager ■ ■ Christine St, Construct sidewalk on both B 2017 2018 2023 $0 $0 $1,014,000 Joe Tate Northview St/Ustick sides of Christine,from Rd Northview to Ustick as per the West Bench Neighborhood Plan.Includes roadway rehabilitation.In-house design. Clement St,Cabarton Complete sidewalk on Clement B 2024 2024 2025 $32,000 $2,000 $258,000 Ricardo Ln/Mountain View Dr St from Cabarton Ln to Calderon Mountain View Dr in accordance with the West Bench Neighborhood Plan. Cory Ln,Mitchell St Complete sidewalk on the B 2021 2022 2023 $46,000 $100,000 $195,000 Seth /Maple Grove Rd north side of Cory Ln from Jarsky Maple Grove Rd to Mitchell St as per the West Bench Neighborhood Plan. Deer Flat Rd and Install an enhanced K 2019 2019 2020-2021 $32,000 $1,000 $16,000 Jason School Ave Pedestrian pedestrian crossing Tugby Crossing (pedestrian hybrid beacon)on Deer Flat Rd at School Ave. Deer Flat Rd,School Construct an asphalt pathway K 2020 N/A 2020 $26,000 $0 $16,000 Jason Ave/Deerhorn Ave on the north side of Deer Tugby Flat from School Ave to Deerhorn Ave.Project includes asphalt path to the west near the Teed Lateral and sidewalk connection near Kuna High School. 2020 Commission Directive Projects. Desert Ave,Latigo Dr Construct sidewalk within A 2023 2024 2025 $24,000 $3,000 $208,000 Ricardo /Round Up St existing right-of-way on the Calderon south side of Desert Ave, between Latigo Dr and Round Up St. Enhanced School Install enhanced pedestrian B,M 2020 2020 2021 $24,000 $2,000 $173,000 Joe Tate Crossings-Meridian crossings(rectangular rapid Middle School and flashing beacons)on West Capital High School 08th St in front of Meridian Middle School and on Milwaukee St next to Capital High School at the existing crosswalks. Five Mile Rd and La Install an enhanced crossing A 2021 2021 2022 $60,000 $3,000 $397,000 Ryan Cutler Grange St Pedestrian on Five Mile at La Grange. Crossing Install an asphalt pathway with extruded curb on the east side of Five Mile,south La Grange St and on the south side of La Grange. Franklin St,McKinley Construct sidewalks on the B 2019 2020 2021 $91,000 $2,000 $256,000 Jason St/Pierce St north side of Franklin St, Tugby between McKinley St and Pierce St. Garden St,Bethel St Construct sidewalks on the B 2023 2024 2025 $242,000 $31,000 $1,168,000 Ricardo /Emerald St both sides of Garden St, Calderon between Bethel St and Emerald St as per the Central Bench Neighborhood Plan. Page 145 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. stration Fee Projects Estimated Cost roject Me Project Name Project Description = nager ■ ■ Garden St,Franklin Construct sidewalks on the B 2019 2020 2022 $175,000 $63,000 $803,000 Seth Rd/Bethel St both sides of Garden St, Jarsky between Franklin Rd and Bethel St as per the Central Bench Neighborhood Plan. Hazel St,28th St/ Construct detached sidewalk B 2018-2019 2019 2020-2021 $0 $0 $34,000 David 26th St on the south side of Hazel Rader St,between 28th St and 26th St. Irene St,32nd St/ Construct curb,gutter,and B 2023 2024 Future $101,000 $2,000 $346,000 Ricardo 28th St sidewalk on the south side of Calderon Irene between 32nd and 28th. Kootenai St Traffic Implement components of the B 2021 2021-2022 2023-2024 $286,000 $0 $1,942,000 David Calming,Orchard St/ Kootenai St Traffic Calming Rader Vista Ave Concept Study.Project to be completed in phases. Kuna Middle School Install school zone beacons K 2021 2021 2022 $0 $4,000 $158,000 Seth Zone,Ten Mile Ave on Ten Mile and Boise near Jarsky and Boise St Kuna Middle School.Includes lighting at Ten Mile and Sego Prairie. Linda Vista Ln,Cory Construct curb,gutter and B 2023 2024 Future $113,000 $65,000 $760,000 Chris Ln/Ustick Rd sidewalk on west side of Dayley Linda Vista Ln from Canterbury Dr to Ustick Rd. Priority project request from the Boise School District. Linder Rd,Main St/ Complete curb,gutter, K 2021-2022 2023 2024 $265,000 $133,000 $1,472,000 Joe Tate Deer Flat Rd sidewalk and a Level 3 bike facility on Linder Rd from 4th St to Deer Flat Rd. Project will construct an enhanced crossing at Porter St. Milwaukee St,Marcum Install curb,gutter,and B 2023 2024 2025 $160,000 $33,000 $971,000 Ricardo St/Ustick Rd sidewalk on the west side of Calderon Milwaukee St from Marcum St to Ustick Rd.Sidewalk would be placed between the canal and the roadway. Phillippi St, Rebuild roadway to include a B 2023 2024 2025 $110,000 $29,000 $1,289,000 Ricardo Overland Rd/Cassia T attached curb,gutter,and Calderon St sidewalk on both sides of the road and install bikeway signage and markings.Rebuild roadway due to cross slope issues. Pollard Ln,Floating Construct a T asphalt path S 2022 2022 2023 $40,000 $32,000 $194,000 Chris Feather Rd/Star on the west side of Pollard, Dayley Middle School between Floating Feather and Star Middle School and on Floating Feather,west of Pollard.Project includes a pedestrian bridge over the canal. Roe St,Limelight St Install an asphalt path on B 2025 Future Future $24,000 $52,000 $42,000 Ricardo /Caswell St the west side of Roe between Calderon Limelight and Caswell. Page 146 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. stration Fee Projects Estimated Cost roject Me Project Name Project Description M nager ■ ■ Stoddard Rd,Victory Reconstruct Stoddard,between M 2022 2023 2024 $309,000 $149,000 $1,530,000 David Rd/Overland Rd Victory and Overland to Rader Manes,sidewalks and bike lanes or multi-use paths. Project includes bridge#2085 and an enhanced crossing at Victory and Stoddard. Warm Springs Ave and Install an enhance pedestrian B 2022 2022 2023 $33,000 $3,000 $156,000 Seth Straughan Ave crossing(rectangular rapid Jarsky Pedestrian Crossing flashing beacon)on Warm Springs Ave at Straughan Ave as per the East End Neighborhood Plan. Page 147 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. ENJifiNtal. Program Estimated Cost Project Project Name Project Description = Manager Green Stormwater Reconstruct two alleys in B 2018 N/A 2020-2021 $31,000 $2,000 $40,000 David Implementation(2019) downtown Boise identified as Rader part of ACHD's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) permit compliance program. Alleys are located south of Bannock,4th/5th and east of 10th,Miller/Myrtle. Green Stormwater Implement identified green TBD 2021 N/A 2022 $50,000 $11,000 $408,000 Joe Tate Implementation(2022) stormwater infrastructure projects at select locations to be identified as part of ACHD's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)permit compliance program. Green Stormwater Implement identified green TBD 2022 N/A 2023 $50,000 $0 $450,000 Seth Implementation(2023) stormwater infrastructure Jarsky projects at select locations to be identified as part of ACHD's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)permit compliance program. Green Stormwater Implement identified green TBD 2023 N/A 2024 $50,000 $0 $450,000 Erica Implementation(2024) stormwater infrastructure Anderson- projects at select locations Maguire to be identified as part of ACHD's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)permit compliance program. Green Stormwater Implement identified green TBD 2024 N/A 2025 $50,000 $0 $450,000 Erica Implementation(2025) stormwater infrastructure Anderson- projects at select locations Maguire to be identified as part of ACHD's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)permit compliance program. Green Stormwater Implement identified green TBD 2025 N/A 2026 $50,000 $0 $450,000 Erica Implementation(2026) stormwater infrastructure Anderson- projects at select locations Maguire to be identified as part of ACHD's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)permit compliance program. Thurman Mill Bridge Provide water quality and G 2020 2021 2022 $33,000 $163,000 $52,000 Seth Projects Water quantity mitigation for a Jarsky Quality Mitigation series of bridge projects being reconstructed in or near the Thurman Mill drainage area. Whitewater Park Blvd Modify stormwater basin#1009 B 2020-2021 N/A Future $181,000 $0 $0 Dyan Basin#1009 to improve drainage and water Bevins quality. Page 148 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6Ny and. Operations Program Operations and Maintenance Estimated Cost Project Name Project. . . ject Em ®® ® Pro •. Arterial Dynamic Install arterial DMS signs on TBD N/A N/A 2023 $0 $0 $320,000 Shawn Message Sign major commuter routes such a Martin Installation Chinden Blvd,State St and Fairview Ave to provide incident,construction and travel time information to drivers. Fiber Optic Cable Replace existing ACHD fiber TBD N/A N/A 2024 $0 $0 $100,000 Shawn Network Update or add additional fiber in Martin existing conduit to improve operation of the ACHD network. Traffic Signals New Rebuild and upgrade selected TBD N/A N/A 2021 $0 $0 $300,000 Shawn and Upgraded(2021) traffic signals,including Martin poles and mast arms,as well as detection and electrical systems. Traffic Signals New Rebuild and upgrade selected TBD N/A N/A 2022 $0 $0 $300,000 Shawn and Upgraded(2022) traffic signals,including Martin poles and mast arms,as well as detection and electrical systems. Traffic Signals New Rebuild and upgrade selected TBD N/A N/A 2023 $0 $0 $300,000 Shawn and Upgraded(2023) traffic signals,including Martin poles and mast arms,as well as detection and electrical systems. Traffic Signals New Rebuild and upgrade selected TBD N/A N/A 2024 $0 $0 $300,000 Shawn and Upgraded(2024) traffic signals,including Martin poles and mast arms,as well as detection and electrical systems. Traffic Signals New Rebuild and upgrade selected TBD N/A N/A 2025 Shawn and Upgraded(2025) traffic signals,including Martin poles and mast arms,as well as detection and electrical systems. Page 149 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. Item#6. ccessibility Estimated Cost roject Ma Project Name Project Description M_ = nager ■ ■ Benjamin Ln and BVRR Install crossing signal, B 2021 N/A 2022 $10,000 $0 $310,000 Cody Crossing Improvement including constant warning Homan detection,at the Boise Valley Railroad crossing of Benjamin Ln in Boise.Project to be design by the Idaho Department of Transportation in coordination with ACHD. Fairview Ave and Replace pedestrian poles with B 2020 2020 2021 $30,000 $0 $221,000 Jason Curtis Rd Accessible Accessible Pedestrian Tugby Pedestrian Signal Signal-compatible push buttons and replace pedestrian ramps with ADA compliant ramps. Fairview Ave and Replace pedestrian poles with B 2020 2020 2021 $29,000 $0 $149,000 Jason Milwaukee St Accessible Pedestrian Signals Tugby Accessible Pedestrian and replace pedestrian ramps Signal with ADA compliant ramps. Includes radius flattening of the southwest corner to minimize existing curb damage. Fairview Ave and Replace pedestrian poles with B 2021 2021 2022 $53,000 $4,000 $464,000 Ryan Cutler Orchard St Accessible Pedestrian Signal-compatible push buttons and replace pedestrian ramps with directional ramps.Project will also reduce the radius of the southwest corner. Orchard St and Clark Install a left turn lane at B 2022 2023 2024 $103,000 $381,000 $714,000 Cody St the intersection of Orchard Homan St and Clark St to enhance intersection safety. Orchard St and Install Accessible Pedestrian B 2023 2024 2025 $107,000 $42,000 $557,000 Seth Franklin Rd Signals at the Franklin Rd Jarsky Accessible Pedestrian and Orchard St intersection Signal to enhance accessibility in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Overland Rd and Vista Complete intersection B 2021 Future Future $40,000 $0 $0 Ricardo Ave Intersection maintenance,drainage Calderon Maintenance and improvement and remove Safety Improvement free-running right turn lane. Requested for scoping by Design and Pavement Management. Rose Hill St and Replace the current two-way B 2021-2022 2023 2024 $100,000 $18,000 $277,000 Joe Tate Owyhee St Mini stop controlled intersection Roundabout with a mini-roundabout to enhance intersection safety. Page 150 2020/7/9 *Update annually. Subject to change. LL--#6. f Meridian 2020 Prioritization Requests - Project Update Updates include draft FY2021-2025 IFYWP. Programming status is subject to change. 020 Priority N Constructic Ranking Agency Project Name Agency Project Description ROW YR YR ACHD Response ACHD Implementation Project Roads& Intersections 1 Locust Grove Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd Widen Locust Grove Rd to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2019 2020-2021 2022 Project to be built in 2022. Locust Grove Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd Project added to IFYWP for discussion purposes. ACHD to Widen Linder Rd to 5 lanes and construct a new 4-lane 1-84 overpass,including curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in coordinate with ITD on request. Project to move forward 2 Linder Rd,Overland Rd/Franklin Rd accordance with the 2016 CIP.Project would be a joint project between ACHD and ITD Future Future Future when funding partnership is possible. Linder Rd,Overland Rd/Franklin Rd Not Not Not Per City request,ACHD to coordinate with Meridian to discuss 3 Locust Grove Rd,Fairview Ave/Ustick Rd Widen Locust Grove Rd to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Programmed Programmed Programmed scope. Locust Grove Rd,Fairview Ave/Ustick Rd Widen intersection to 9 lanes on Fairview Ave and 7 lanes on Locust Grove Rd,including curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike 4 Fairview Ave and Locust Grove Rd lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2020-2021 2021-2022 2023 Project to be built in 2023. Fairview Ave and Locust Grove Rd 5 Eagle Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd Widen Eagle Rd to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2018 2019-2020 2021-2022 Project to be built in 2021-2022. Eagle Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd 6 Ten Mile Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd Widen Ten Mile Rd to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2019 2020-2021 2022-2023 Project to be built in 2022-2023. Ten Mile Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd 7 Victory Rd,Locust Grove Rd/Eagle Rd Widen Victory Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2023 2024 Future Project to begin design in 2023. Victory Rd,Locust Grove Rd/Eagle Rd 8 Ustick Rd,Ten Mile Rd/Linder Rd Widen Ustick Rd to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2022 2023 2025 Project to be built in 2025. Ustick Rd,Ten Mile Rd/Linder Rd 9 Linder Rd,Cherry Ln/Ustick Rd Widen Linder Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with 2016 CIP. 2025 Future Future 1 Project to begin design in 2025. Linder Rd,Cherry Ln/Ustick Rd Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 10 Locust Grove Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd Widen Locust Grove Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes. Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Locust Grove Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd 11 Victory Rd,Meridian Rd/Locust Grove Rd Widen Victory Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2023 2024 2025 Project to be built in 2025. Victory Rd,SH 69(Meridian Rd)/Locust Grove Rd 12 Ten Mile Rd/Cherry Ln Intersection improvements to include dual left turn lanes. 2025 Future Future I Project to begin design in 2025. Ten Mile Rd and Cherry Ln 13 Eagle Rd/Overland Rd Intersection improvements to include dual left turn lanes. 2025 Future Future Project to begin design in 2025. Overland Rd and Eagle Rd Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 14 McMillan Rd,Meridian Rd/Locust Grove Rd Widen McMillan Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes. Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. McMillan Rd,SH 69(Meridian Rd)/Locust Grove Rd Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 15 McMillan Rd,Linder Rd/Meridian Rd Widen McMillan Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes. Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. McMillan Rd,Linder Rd/SH 69(Meridian Rd) Construct a multi-lane roundabout with 2 lanes on Locust Grove legs and 1 lane on Victory legs in accordance with the 16 Victory Rd and Locust Grove Rd Roundabout 2016 CIP. 2019 2020-2021 2022-2023 Project to be built in 2022-2023. Victory Rd and Locust Grove Rd Roundabout Widen intersection or add roundabout in accordance with the Master Street Map.Traffic analysis should determine the 17 Ten Mile Rd and Victory Rd ultimate lane configuration based on above projects in the area. 2019-2020 2020-2021 2022-2023 Project to be built in 2022-2023. Ten Mile Rd and Victory Rd Meridian Rd,McMillan Rd/US 20126(Chinden 18 Meridian Rd,McMillan Rd/Chinden Blvd Widen Meridian Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2023 2024 Future Project to begin design in 2023. Blvd) Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 19 Locust Grove Rd,Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd Widen Locust Grove Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Locust Grove Rd,Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd 20 Meridian Rd,Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd Widen Meridian Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2023 2024 Future Project to begin design in 2023. Meridian Rd,Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd 21 Lake Hazel Rd and Eagle Rd Widen and signalize intersection to 4/5 lanes on Eagle and 315 lanes on Lake in accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2020 1 2021-2022 2022 Project to be built in 2022. Lake Hazel Rd and Eagle Rd Not Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Reevaluate as 22 Overland Rd and Linder Rd Widen and signalize intersection to 5 lanes on Linder Rd and 6 lanes on Overland Rd in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Programmed Programmed Programmed conditions change. Overland Rd and Linder Rd Not Not 23 Ustick Rd and Black Cat Rd Construct a dual lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Programmed Programmed 2021 Interim Signal to be constructed in 2021. Ustick Rd and Black Cat Rd Not Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Reevaluate as 24 Ustick,Black Cat to Ten Mile Widen to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes. Programmed Programmed Programmed l conditions change. Ustick Rd,Black Cat Rd/Ten Mile Rd Not Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Reevaluate as 25 Victory,Linder to Meridian Widen to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes. Programmed Programmed Programmed conditions change. Victory Rd,Linder Rd/SH 69(Meridian Rd) Eagle Rd and Amity Rd Roundabout(Dual Widen roundabout to a dual lane roundabout,with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes. Project to be constructed 26 Lane) concurrently with Eagle Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd. 2020 2020 2021-2022 Project to be built in 2021-2022. Eagle Rd and Amity Rd Roundabout(Dual Lane) Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 27 Franklin Rd,McDermott Rd/Black Cat Rd Widen Franklin Rd to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes. Programmed Programmed Programmed ITUture IFYWP updates. Franklin Rd,McDermott Rd/Black Cat Rd Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 28 Eagle Rd/Franklin Rd Not provided Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Eagle Rd and Franklin Rd 29 Ten Mile Rd and Amity Rd Construct a roundabout.Project includes bridge#205AX. 2018 2019-2020 2021 1 Project to be built in 2021. Ten Mile Rd and Amity Rd page 151 Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into Item#6. herry Ln and Linder Rd Widen intersection to 4 lanes Linder Rd and 5/6 lanes on Cherry Ln in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Cherry Ln and Linder Rd Not Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Reevaluate as 31 Cherry Ln and Black Cat Rd Widen intersection to 5/6 lanes on Black Cat Rd and 5 lanes on Cherry Ln in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Programmed Programmed Programmed conditions change. Cherry Ln and Black Cat Rd Not Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Reevaluate as 32 Fairview Ave,SH 55(Eagle Rd)/Cloverdale Rd Widen Fairview Ave to 7 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Programmed Programmed Programmed conditions change. Fairview Ave,SH 55(Eagle Rd)/Cloverdale Rd Linder Rd,Chinden Blvd(US 20/26)/SH 44(State Widen Linder Rd in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Cross section to be determined through concept design. Project Linder Rd,Chinden Blvd(US 20126)/SH 44(State 33 St) includes bridges#1078,#2033,#2034,#2035,and#2036. 2024-2025 Future Future Project to begin design in 2024-2025. St) 34 Fairview Ave,Locust Grove Rd/SH 55(Eagle Rd) Widen Fairview Ave to 7 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2020-2021 2021-2022 2023 Project to be built in 2023. Fairview Ave,Locust Grove Rd/SH 55(Eagle Rd) Not Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Reevaluate as 35 Fairview Ave,Meridian Rd/Locust Grove Rd Widen Fairview Ave to 7 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Programmed Programmed Programmed conditions change. Fairview Ave,Meridian Rd/Locust Grove Rd Not Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Reevaluate as 36 Cherry Ln,Linder Rd/Meridian Rd Widen Cherry Ln to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes. Programmed Programmed Programmed conditions change. Cherry Ln,Linder Rd/Meridian Rd Project to be implemented through development. ACHD and Fairview Ave Corridor Management,Linder Improve safety and traffic operations along Fairview Ave in accordance with the Fairview Avenue Corridor Management Not Not Not Meridian to coordinate implementation as development Fairview Ave Corridor Management,Linder Rd/ 37 Rd/Orchard St Strategy.Project may include bicycle and pedestrian facilities and other access management treatments. Programmed Programmed Programmed applications are processed. Orchard St Not Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Reevaluate as 38 Ten Mile Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd Widen Ten Mile Rd to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes. Programmed Programmed Programmed conditions change. Ten Mile Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd East 03rd St Extension,Carlton St/Fairview Ave Extend roadway and construct streetscape improvements, including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and improved UPRR Not Not Not 39 (Phase 2) crossing,from Carlton Ave to Fairview Ave in accordance with the Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer until completion of Phase 1(Franklin to Carlton). East 03rd St Carlton St/Fairview Ave(Phase 2) Broadway Ave/Idaho Ave Extension,East Not Not Not Broadway Ave/Idaho Ave Extension,06th St/ 40 06th St/Locust Grove Rd Not provided Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer. To be considered as properties redevelopment. Locust Grove Rd Not Not 41 McMillan Rd and Black Cat Rd Construct a multi-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Programmed Programmed 2021 Interim Signal to be constructed in 2022. McMillan Rd and Black Cat Rd Not Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Reevaluate as 42 Amity Rd and Black Cat Rd Widen intersection to 3/4 lanes on Amity and 314 lanes on Black Cat in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Programmed Programmed Programmed conditions change. Amity Rd and Black Cat Rd Not Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Reevaluate as 43 McMillan Rd and Star Rd Construct a multi-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Programmed Programmed Programmed l conditions change. McMillan Rd and Star Rd Not Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Reevaluate as 44 Amity Rd and Linder Rd Construct a single-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Programmed Programmed Programmed conditions change. Amity Rd and Linder Rd Not Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Reevaluate as 45 Cherry Ln and McDermott Rd Widen intersection to 3 lanes on McDermott and 5 lanes on Cherry. Programmed Programmed Programmed conditions change. Cherry Ln and McDermott Rd 46 Franklin Rd and McDermott Rd Construct a single-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2024 2025 Future Project to begin design in 2024. Franklin Rd and McDermott Rd Not Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Reevaluate as 47 Ustick Rd and McDermott Rd Widen intersection to 3 lanes on McDermott and 4 lanes on Ustick in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Programmed Programmed Programmed conditions change. Ustick Rd and McDermott Rd Not Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Reevaluate as 48 McMillan Rd and McDermott Rd Widen and signalize intersection to 3/4 lanes on McDermott and 3 lanes on in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Programmed Programmed Programmed conditions change. McMillan Rd and McDermott Rd Not Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Reevaluate as 49 Ustick Rd and Star Rd Construct a single-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Programmed Programmed Programmed conditions change. Ustick Rd and Star Rd Not Not Not Does not currently meet warrants. ACHD to reevaluate as 50 Ten Mile Rd and Chateau Dr Signalize intersection. Programmed Programmed Programmed development occurs in the area. Ten Mile Rd and Chateau Dr Not Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Reevaluate as 51 Lake Hazel Rd and Locust Grove Rd Construct a single-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Programmed Programmed Programmed conditions change. Lake Hazel Rd and Locust Grove Rd Not Not 52 Amity Rd and Locust Grove Rd Widen and signalize intersection to 3/4 lanes on Locust Grove and 5/6 lanes on Amity in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Programmed Programmed 2023 Interim signal to be constructed in 2023. Amity Rd and Locust Grove Rd Not Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Reevaluate as 53 Victory Rd and Linder Rd Construct a single-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Programmed Programmed Programmed conditions change. Victory Rd and Linder Rd Locust Grove Rd,McMillan Rd/Chinden Not Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Reevaluate as Locust Grove Rd,McMillan Rd/US 20/26(Chinden 54 Blvd(US 20/26) Widen Locust Grove Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP. Programmed Programmed Programmed conditions change. Blvd) Not Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Reevaluate as 55 Ustick Rd,McDermott Rd/Black Cat Rd Widen Ustick Rd to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes. Programmed Programmed Programmed conditions change. Ustick Rd,McDermott Rd/Black Cat Rd Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 56 Pine,Linder to Meridian Widen to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalks and/or multi-use or mixed-use bikeway. Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Pine Ave,Linder Rd/Meridian Rd Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 57 Eagle Rd/Fairview Ave Not provided Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Eagle Rd and Fairview Ave Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 58 Lake Hazel/Discovery Park Intersection improvements requested at entrance to Discovery Park. Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Lake Hazel Rd and Discovery Park Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 59 Amity,Eagle to Cloverdale Widen to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes.TBD Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Amity Rd,Eagle Rd/Cloverdale Rd. Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 60 Amity,Locust Grove to Eagle TBD Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Amity Rd,Locust Grove Rd/Eagle Rd Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 61 Victory,Ten Mile to Linder TBD I Programmed 1 Programmed 1 Programmed ifuture IFYWP updates. Victory Rd,Ten Mile Rd/Linder Rd Not Not Not ITo be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 62 Black Cat,Cherry to Ustick TBD ProgrammLdLProgrammedLgrammed future IFYWP updates. Blact Cat Rd,Cherry Ln/Ustick Rd Page 152 Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into Item#6. lack Cat,Franklin to Cherry TBD Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Blact Cat Rd,Franklin Rd/Cherry Ln Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 64 Black Cat,Ustick to McMillan TBD Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Black Cat Rd,Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into Black Cat Rd,McMillan Rd US 20126(Chinden 65 Black Cat,McMillan to Chinden TBD Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Blvd) Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 66 McMillan,Black Cat to Ten Mile TBD Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. McMillan Rd,Black Cat Rd/Ten Mile Rd Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 67 McMillan,Ten Mile to Linder TBD Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. McMillan Rd,Ten Mile Rd/Linder Rd 68 Eagle,Lake Hazel to Amity TBD 1 2021 1 2022 2023 Project to be built in 2023. Eagle Rd,Lake Hazel Rd/Amity Rd Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 69 Locust Grove,Lake Hazel to Amity TBD.3-lane? Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Locust Grove Rd,Lake Hazel Rd/Amity Rd Community Programs 1 Locust Grove Rd,Overland Rd/Puffin St Construct a detached asphalt or concrete pathway on east side of Locust Grove between Puffin Stand Overland Rd. 2019 2020-2021 2022 Project to be built in 2022. Locust Grove Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd Reconstruct Stoddard Rd,between Victory Rd and Overland Rd to 3-lanes,7'attached sidewalks and bike lanes.Project Stoddard Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd(Stoddard includes bridge #2085 and an enhanced pedestrian crossing (pedestrian hybrid beacon) at Victory and Stoddard 2 Rd,Victory Rd/Kodiak Dr) (CM214-27).Bike lanes may be replaced by a pathway per the Bike Master Plan Update. 2022 2023 2024 Project to be built in 2024. Stoddard Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd Construct streetscape improvements,including curb,gutter,sidewalk,and improved UPRR crossing,from Franklin Rd 3 East 03rd St,Franklin Rd/Carlton Ave(Phase 1) to Carlton Ave in accordance with the Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Plan. 2022 2023 2025 Projects to be built in 2025. East 03rd St Franklin Rd/Carlton St 4 Broadway Ave,West 07th St/West 04th St Complete sidewalks on the south side of Broadway Ave,between West 07th St and West 04th St. 2024 2025 Future Project to begin design in 2024. Broadway Ave,West 08th St/West 04th St Install extruded curb pathway on north side of McMillan Rd between Cortona Way and Goddard Creek Way and 5 McMillan Rd,Ten Mile Rd/Linder Rd detached concrete sidewalk with curbing between Goddard Creek Way and Wild Goose Way. 2024 2025 Future Project to begin design in 2024. McMillan Rd,Ten Mile Rd/Linder Rd Remove mid-block cross-walk by Hillsdale and add enhanced cross-walks at Lachlan and near Rockhampton/Hill Park St. Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into Hillsdale Elementary Pedestrian Crossings and 6 Stockenham Enhanced Cross-walks Update school zone signs and flashers. Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. School Zone 7 East 21/2 St,Carlton Ave/Fairview Ave Install sidewalk on the west and/or east side. 2024 2025 Future Project to begin design in 2024. 02nd 1/2 St Carlton Ave/Fairview Ave Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 8 Capulet Way at Siena Elementary Install crosswalk of Capulet Way on the west side of Siena Elementary school micro path. Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Capulet Way Pedestrian Crossing(S/O Falcon Dr) 9 Main St and King Street Pedestrian Crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing of Main St at King Street. 2024 2024 2025 1 Project to be built in 2025. Main St and Williams St Pedestrian Crossing McMillan Rd and Palantine Way Pedestrian Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into McMillan Rd and Palantine Way Pedestrian 10 Crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing and curb ramps on McMillan Rd at Palantine Way. Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Crossing Not Not Not ACHD to prioritize and scope arterial crossings when City 11 Meridian Rail-with-Trail Multi-use pathway along rail road tracks. Programmed Programmed Programmed moves pathway project forward. Meridian Rail-with-Trail Locust Grove Rd and Woodbridge Dr Pedestrian Locust Grove Rd and Woodbridge Dr Pedestrian 12 Crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing of Locust Grove Rd at Woodbridge Dr or Watertower St. 2023 2023 2024 Project to be built in 2024. Crossing Not Not Not 13 Eagle Rd,River Valley St/Ustick Rd Complete sidewalks on Eagle Rd,between River Valley Stand Ustick Rd. Programmed Programmed Programmed ITD facility. ACHD to share request with ITD. Eagle Rd,River Valley St/Ustick Rd Extend roadway and construct streetscape improvements, including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and improved UPRR Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 14 E.3rd Carlton to Fairview crossing,from Carlton Ave to Fairview Ave in accordance with the Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. East 03rd St Carlton St/Fairview Ave(Phase 2) Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 15 Washington St,W.07th St/Main St Complete sidewalk on Washington St,between W.07th Stand Main St. Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Washington St,07th St/Main St Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into Taconic Dr and Pioneer Trail Ave Pedestrian 16 Taconic Dr/Pioneer Install crosswalk at intersection of Taconic and Pioneer(Hillsdale Subdivision). Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Crossing Amity and Mary McPherson Elementary School Not Not Not Scoped "Go- Defer" in 2017 due to low pedestrian volumes.Amity Rd and Mary McPherson Elementary School 17 Pedestrian Signal Signalized pedestrian crossing. Programmed Programmed Programmed ACHD to reevaluate as conditions change in the area. Pedestrian Crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing(rectangular rapid flashing beacon)on Pine Ave at W 01st St to improve access 18 Pine Ave and W.1st St Pedestrian Crossing to Meridian Elementary School. 2025 2025 Future Project to begin design in 2025. Pine Ave and 01st St Pedestrian Crossing Evaluation completed fall 2016 shows existing crossing meet Not Not Not needs of current users. ACHD to reevaluate as conditions 19 Washington Stand W 1st St Pedestrian Crossing Pedestrian crossing near Meridian Elementary School. Programmed Programmed Programmed change. Washington St and 01st St Pedestrian Crossing Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 20 Bower St,Meridian Rd/E.03rd St Complete sidewalks and add wayfinding signage on Bower St,between Meridian Rd and E.03rd St. Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Bower St Meridian Rd/03rd St 21 McMillan Rd,Locust Grove Rd/Red Horse Way Complete sidewalk on the north side of McMillan Rd,between Locust Grove Rd and Red Horse Way. 2024 2025 Future Project to begin design in 2024. McMillan Rd,Red Horse Way/Locust Grove Rd Project added to IFYWP for discussion purposes. ACHD to coordinate with ITD on request. Project to move forward 22 Linder Rd,1-84/Franklin Rd Complete sidewalks the west side on Linder Rd,between 1-84 and Franklin Rd. Future Future Future when funding partnership is possible. Linder Rd,Overland Rd/Franklin Rd Not Not Not 23 Linder Rd,Washington St/Maple St Complete sidewalk on the west side of Linder Rd,between Washington St and Maple St. Programmed Programmed Programmed Complete pedestrian facilities existing in this section. Linder Rd,Washington St/Maple St 24 Victory Rd,Glacier Bay Way/Mesa Way Complete sidewalk on the south side adjacent to county parcel. 2023 2024 2025 Project to be built in 2025. Victory Rd,SH 69(Meridian Rd)/Locust Grov Page 153 Locust Grove Rd and Palermo Dr Pedestrian Item#6. ocust Grove Rd and Palermo Dr Pedestrian Signal Install an enhanced pedestrian signal and lighting on the north side of Palermo at Locust Grove. 2022 2022 2023 Project to be built in 2023. Crossing W 08th St and Meridian Middle School Pedestrian Enhanced School Crossings-Meridian Middle School 26 Crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing on 8th St at Meridian Middle School. 2020 2020 2021 Project to be built in 2021. and Capital High School Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing of Meridian Rd at/near Settlers Park entrance and Sundance Subdivision Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into Meridian Rd Pedestrian Crossings(Settlers Park 27 Meridian,north of Ustick micropath. Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Entrance/Sundance Sub Micropath) Not Not Not 28 Chinden Blvd,east of Ten Mile Rd Complete sidewalks on Chinden Blvd,east of Ten Mile Rd. Programmed Programmed Programmed ITD facility. ACHD to share request with ITD. Chinden Blvd,E/O Ten Mile Rd Locust Grove Rd and Time Zone Dr Pedestrian 29 Crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing of Locust Grove Rd at Time Zone Dr. 2019 2020-2021 2022 Project to be built in 2022. Locust Grove Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 30 Taormina Drive at Maesaia Way Install sidewalk on south side of Taormina Drive near Maesaia Way. Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Taormina Dr at Maesaia Way Not Not Not 31 Woodbridge Neighborhood Bike Study Study the connectivity and bikeability of the Woodbridge neighborhood. Programmed Programmed Programmed ACHD to evaluate as part of future budgeting efforts. Woodbridge Neighborhood Bike Study Not Not Not ACHD Traffic Engineering does not recommend installation. Watertower St and Rebound School Pedestrian 32 Watertower St at Rebound School Install a painted crosswalk on Watertower St at Rebound School. Programmed Programmed Programmed Crossing activity is caused by parent drop off. Crossing Not Not Not JACHD Traffic believes current signage is adequate. No 33 Linder Rd,Chateau Dr/Barbara Morgan STEM Way finding signage on Linder. Programmed Programmed Programmed jadditional signage recommended. Linder Rd,Chateau Dr/Barber Morgan STEM Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 34 St.Ignatius School Pedestrian Signal Pedestrian signal on Meridian Road at Producer. Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Meridian Rd and Producer Dr Pedestrian Crossing Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 35 Bridgetower Pedestrian Signal Pedestrian signal on Ustick Road at Bridgetower(Towerbridge?)Drive. Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Ustick Rd and Towerbridge Way Pedestrian Crossing Pedestrian connection (sidewalk) between Barbara Drive in Fairview Terrace Park to E. Willowbrook Drive and Chief Not Not Not ACHD to support City led effort. Coonection would be located 36 Fairview Terrace to Chief Joseph Joseph Elementary on Chateau Drive. Programmed Programmed Programmed on private property. Barbara Dr Pedestrian Connection Not Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion into 37 Amity,Eagle to Hillsdale Pedestrian improvements on Amity to the YMCA and City Park. Programmed Programmed Programmed future IFYWP updates. Amity Rd,Eagle Rd/Cloverdale Rd. Complete sidewalk on both sides of West 02nd, between the Union Pacific Railroad and Broadway Ave to address Not Not Not Sidewalk scoped "No Go" in 2015. Agencies to coordinate if 38 West 02nd St,UPRR/Broadway Ave parking concerns in this area. Programmed Programmed Programmed other solutions identified. West 02nd,UPRR/Broadway Ave Asphalt pathway with extruded curb exists on the east side 39 Locust Grove Rd,Paradise Ln/Grand Canyon Dr Asphalt path on the east side of Locust Grove Rd to connect with an existing path to the school. Completed Completed Completed of Locust Grove Rd. Project completed in 2010. Locust Grove Rd,Paradise Ln/Grand Canyon Dr Scoped"Go-Defer"in 2015. Sidewalk exists on the east side. Not Not Not ACHD to reevaluate if existing sidewalk does not meet needs 40 Kentucky Ridge Way,Riodosa Dr/Victory Rd Sidewalk on the west side of Kentucky Ridge Way,between Victory and Riodosa. Programmed Programmed Programmed in area. Kentucky Way,Riodosa Dr/Victory Rd Scoped"No Go"in 2015. This section has connectivity already Not Not Not on the south side and the original requestor no longer owns 41 State Ave,East 2nd St/Cathy Ln Sidewalk repair.Requested by land owner in this area. Programmed Programmed Programmed the property. State Ave,2nd St/Cathy Ln Nola Rd and Crossroads Middle School Pedestrian Not Not Not Scoped "No Go" in 2018 as issues are caused by drop-off Nola Rd and Crossroads Middle School Pedestrian 42 Crossing Install a painted crosswalk on Nola Rd at Crossroads Middle School. Programmed Programmed Programmed activities.Encourage school to work with parents. Crossing Not Not Not Scoped "No Go" in 2018. Sidewalk on east side to be built 43 Nola Rd,south of Pine Ave Middle School Construct sidewalk on the east side of Nola Rd from Pine Ave to Crossroads. Programmed Programmed Programmed through development. Nola Rd,Pine Ave/Crossroads Middle School Page 154 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Community Development: Presentation of Results of Open Space Study Survey Page 155 J Meridian Open Space Survey Executive Summary and Results Presentation CAME COMMurvn r u AUGUST 2020 • Ex iv ecu e Summa ry Conducted May 4t" through June 8t" 1506 respondents ( 18+ who currently live in the City of Meridian) Key findings: Of those surveyed Meridian citizens have positive evaluations of the value of open space. Number of First Place Votes By Category: 71 Nature Reserve - 488 ,57 127 488 ` Public Parks - 314 166 ----- Multi-Purpose Outdoor Urban Spaces - 166 _ Pathways - 127 - - - ONature Reserve ■Public Parks OMulti-purpose Outdoor Working Farm or Dairy Operation - 71 OPathways OWorkingFarm/Dairy ■Historical Site Historical or Cultural Significant Property - 57 • eSummary Execu iv Key findings: 81 % support purchasing property for open space (Q2) 82% support purchasing property for an enhanced Public Parks System (Q3) 79% support purchasing property for a Nature Preserve (Q6) 78% support purchasing property for an enhanced Pathways System (Q4) ► 60% support purchasing property for a Working Dairy or Farming Operation (Q8) No. 59% support purchasing property of Historical or Cultural Significance (Q7) 56% support purchasing property for a Multi-Purpose Outdoor Urban Space (Q5) 457 or 48% of respondents preferred development impact fees be used to fund their open space preferences (F1 ) er2 lilolllliiilllliiiii� OF E QWF Executive Summary ( cont ,., ) Other findings: 66% of respondents were female and 31 % were male (D1 ) 67% of respondents are ages 25-54 (D2) 71 % of respondents have a Bachelor's degree or higher (D5) 90% of respondents live in aSingle-Family home that they own (D6) as • Prope M nq§L Pu c r inr ty Key Finding - 81 % support purchasing property for open space (Q2) Crosstab with Length of Time in Meridian The longer in Meridian the less likely to support Still strong support across length of time demographics Max with 3-4 years at 84% Min with less than 10 years of 78.4% - ,. Crosstab with Age 25-34 years old is peak at 87% Still strong support across age demographics Years in Meridian Crosstab with Education As education increases support for open space increases Max with Bachelor's degrees at 87% Min with Less than High School at 67% oil M nqRL Parks Key Finding - Highest support at 82% support purchasing property for open space for Public Parks Crosstab with Length of Time in Meridian 3-4 years support highest at 88% Crosstab with Age '� - 25-34 years old is peak at 91 % and 35-44 years old is next at 87% Still strong support across age demographics Crosstab with Education - Strong support (>80%) across educational demographics Crosstab with Housing - Multi-family - Rent is peak at 90% Still strong support across age demographic y -x J ... ••' M nqL IF Nature Preserve Key Finding - Second highest support at 79% support purchasing property for open space for Nature Preserve Crosstab with Length of Time in Meridian Max with less than 1 years at 84% Min with greater than 10 years at 78% Still strong support across age demographic Crosstab with Age - Younger respondents tend to support declining as age goes up Max with 18-25 years old at 94% Min with greater than 75 years old at 67% Crosstab with Education Strong support across educational demographics Crosstab with Housing Still strong support across housing demographic - M MI Pathways Key Finding - Third highest support at 78% support purchasing property for open space for Pathways Crosstab with Length of Time in Meridian - 3-4 years support highest at 83% Crosstab with Age - Younger tends to support declining as age goes up Max with 18-25 years old at 88% Min with greater than 75 years old at 63 Crosstab with Education - Strong support across educational demographics Crosstab with Housing - Single-family - Rent is peak at 820 Still strong support across age demographic , 3 Funding : Development ImpactFees Key Finding - 48% of respondents ranked development impact fees first be used to fund their open space preferences Crosstab with Length of Time in Meridian - Increases the longer the respondent has lived in Meridian Max with less than 1 years at 52% Min with greater than 10 years at 35% Still strong support across age demographic Crosstab with Age 45-54 year old and 55-64 year olds ranked the highest at 54% and 56% respectively Crosstab with Education Doctorate degrees proportionally support this highest at 68% Crosstab with Housing Multi-Family Own and Multi-Family-Rent supported this highest at 56% and 60% respectively M nqL IF Conclusion Of those surveyed, citizens value open space They particularly value Nature Reserve, Parks, and Pathways and are willing to pay for them. All open space types received near 60% majorities. Citizen ' s prefer development impact fees be used to procure open space over bonding and using the City' s reserves Source: 7/tem 77 (:> E IDIAN*-----, AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ordinance No. 20-1888: An Ordinance (H-2020-0009 - Lavender Heights Subdivision) for Annexation of a Parcel of Land Located in the SW 1/4 of Section 32, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian,Ada County, Idaho, as Described in Attachment"A" and Annexing Certain Lands and Territory, Situated in Ada County, Idaho, and Adjacent and Contiguous to the Corporate Limits of the City of Meridian as Requested by the City of Meridian; Establishing and Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification of 55.14 Acres of Land From RUT To R-4 (Low Density Residential) Zoning Designation (16.37 Acres); R-8 (Medium Density Residential) Zoning District (28.07 Acres); R-15 (Medium High Density Residential) Zoning District (3.25 Acres); and R-40 (High Density Residential) Zoning District (7.44 Acres) in the Meridian City Code; Providing that Copies of this Ordinance Shall be Filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as Required by Law; and Providing for a Summary of the Ordinance; and Providing for a Waiver of the Reading Rules; and Providing an Effective Date Page 166 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-1 1 0265 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=16 HEATHER LUTHER 08/26/2020 02:45 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE �,e -�e cord p C orrec� ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-106668 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=11 NIKOLA OLSON 08/19/2020 04:50 PM x iI^ CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO NO FEE C� CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 20-1888 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT,BORTON, CAVENER, HOAGLUN, PERREAULT, STRADER AN ORDINANCE (H-2020-0009 — LAVENDER HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION) FOR ANNEXATION OF A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SW '/4 OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AS DESCRIBED IN ATTACHMENT "A" AND ANNEXING CERTAIN LANDS AND TERRITORY, SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; ESTABLISHING AND DETERMINING THE LAND USE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 55.14 ACRES OF LAND FROM RUT TO R-4 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DESIGNATION (16.37 ACRES); R-8 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT (28.07 ACRES); R-15 (MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT (3.25 ACRES); AND R-40 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT (7.44 ACRES) IN THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA,STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. That the following described land as evidenced by attached Legal Description herein incorporated by reference as Exhibit"A"are within the corporate limits of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for annexation and re-zoning by the owner of said property, to-wit: 44 Development LLC.. SECTION 2. That the above-described real property is hereby annexed and re-zoned from RUT to R-4 (Medium Low Density Residential); R-8 (Medium Density Residential); R-15 (Medium High Density Residential); and R-40(High Density Residential) Zoning Districts in the Meridian City Code. SECTION 3. That the City has authority pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and zone said property. SECTION 4. That the City has complied with all the noticing requirements pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and re-zone said property. SECTION 5. That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps, and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. e- Re-Cord -b C,orreC, IFxbib► —5. CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO.20-1888 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT,BORTON,CAVENER, HOAGLUN, PERREAULT,STRADER AN ORDINANCE (H-2020-0009 — LAVENDER HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION) FOR ANNEXATION OF A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SW % OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AS DESCRIBED IN ATTACHMENT "A" AND ANNEXING CERTAIN LANDS AND TERRITORY, SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF MERIDLAN; ESTABLISHING AND DETERMINING THE LAND USE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 55.14 ACRES OF LAND FROM RUT TO R-4 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DESIGNATION (16.37 ACRES); R-8 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT (28.07 ACRES); R-15 (MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT (3.25 ACRES); AND R-40 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT (7.44 ACRES) IN THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. That the following described land as evidenced by attached Legal Description herein incorporated by reference as Exhibit"A"are within the corporate limits of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for annexation and re-zoning by the owner of said property,to-wit, 44 Development LLC.. SECTION 2. That the above-described real property is hereby annexed and re-zoned from RUT to R-4 (Medium Low Density Residential); R-8 (Medium Density Residential); R-15 (Medium High Density Residential); and R-40 (High Density Residential)Zoning Districts in the Meridian City Code. SECTION 3. That the City has authority pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and zone said property. SECTION 4. That the City has complied with all the noticing requirements pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and re-zone said property. SECTION 5. That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps, and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. Item#8. SECTION 6. All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed,rescinded and annulled. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. SECTION 8. The Clerk of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a map prepared in a draftsman manner, including the lands herein rezoned, with the following officials of the County of Ada, State of Idaho, to-wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho. SECTION 9. That pursuant to the affirmative vote of one-half (1/2) plus one (1) of the Members of the full Council, the rule requiring two (2) separate readings by title and one (1) reading in full be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly,this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval and publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 18th day of August , 2020. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO, this 18th day of August , 2020. MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON, CITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO, ) County of Ada ) ss: On this 18th day of August 2020 before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ROBERT E. SIMISON and CHRIS JOHNSON known to me to be the Mayor and CityClerk, respectively,of the Cityof Meridian,Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO RESIDING AT: Meridian MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 3-28-2022 EXHIBIT A Legal Description QW of Meridian Annexation Lavender Heights Subdivision A parcel of land located in the SW%of Section 32,Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an Aluminum cap monument marking the southwest corner of said Section 32, from which an Aluminum cap monument marking the northwest comer of the SW%of said section bears N 0'32'17"W a distance of 2700.11 feet; Thence S 89"57'01"E along the southerly boundary of said SW%a distance of 1331.91 feet to a 518 inch iron pin monument marking the southwest corner of the SE IA of said SW%and the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence N 0°09'52"W along the westerly boundary of said SE '/of the SW%a distance of 431.20 feet to the southeasterly corner of that parcel shown as the"John Freeman"parcel on Record of Survey No.7783,records of Ada County,Idaho; Thence along the southerly,westerly and northerly boundary of said parcel the following courses and distances: Thence N 69°5545"W a distance of 503.30 feet to a point; Thence N 58'00'31"W a distance of 219.85 feet to a point of curvature; Thence a distance of 114.95 feet along the are of a 140.00 foot radius curve right,said curve having a central angle of 47"0241"and a long chord bearing N 34"29'08"W a distance of 111.75 feet to a point of tangency; Thence N 10'57'45"W a distance of 410.17 feet to a point of curvature; Thence a distance of 155.37 feet along the arc of a 110.00 foot radius curve right,said curve having a central angle of 80°55'32"and a long chord bearing N 29°30'30"E a distance of 142.77 feet to a point of tangency; Thence N 69°5744"E a distance of 128.97 feet to a point; Thence N 83°47'06"E a distance of 26.72 feet to a point; Thence S 86°47'31"E a distance of 362.95 feet to a point of curvature; Thence a distance of 122.47 feet along the arc of a 220.00 foot radius curve left,said curve having a central angle of 31"53'39"and a long chord bearing N 77°15'42" E a distance of 120.89 feet to a point of tangency; Thence N 61°18'54"E a distance of 91.61 feet to a point of curvature; Li�in,cliblutions Lavender Heights Annexation �'wRa w„rr+�Q uw con.wu"o Job No,17--55 Page 1 of 2 Lavender Heights Subdivision—H-2020-0009 EXH I BIT A Thence a distance of 22.57 feet along the arc of a 144,67 foot radius curve left, said curve having a central angle of 8°56'24" and a long chord bearing N 56°50'40" E a distance of 22.55 feet to a point on the east boundary of the NW'/4 of the SW'/,of said Section 32.also being the westerly boundary of Blackrock Subdivision No.1,as fled for record in Book 96 of Plats at Pages 12003 through 12008,records of Ada County,Idaho; Thence along said boundary S 0°08'26" E a distance of 101.67 feet to the northwest corner of the SE '/4 of the SW '/4 of said Section 32, said paint also being the northwesterly corner of the "Clayton Properties LLC" parcel shown on said Record of Survey No.7783,and the southwesterly corner of said Blackrock Subdivision No. 1; Thence leaving said"John Freeman"parcel boundary,and along the northerly boundary of said SE%of the SW A being partially along the northerly boundary of said"Clayton Properties LLC" parcel,also being the southerly boundary of said Blackrock Subdivision No. 1 S 89449'51"E a distance of 1340.54 feet to the northeasterly comer of said SE%of the SW%4; Thence along the easterly boundary of said SE '/4 of the SW'/4 S 0°12'02" W a distance of 1344.18 feet to the southeasterly corner of the SW'/,of said Section 32; Thence along the southerly boundary of said SW 1/4 N 89"58'24"W a distance of 1331.96 feet to the POINT-OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 55.14 acres,more or less, and is subject to any easements existing or in use. NpL LqN Clinton W. Hansen, PLS \O S Land Solutions, PC � tis TR G�fi November 25,2019 0 a 1111 � <i 9TF OF SOP yW 'LpON W.\AP� L ndSolutrtons Lavender Heights Annexation f,_- U d Job No.17-55 Page 2 of 2 Lavender Heights Subdivision—H-2020-0009 EXHIBIT A CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXATION 31 32 LAVENDER HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 32, 1/4 T.3N., R.1 E., SM.,ADA COUNTY, IDAHO (W �fV o N61'18'S4"E BLACKROCK SUBDIVISION NO. 1 z N83'47'06'E BOOK 96, PAGES 12003-12008 91.61' S0'D8'26°E o N69'57'44E 2fi,72 362.95' G� 128.97I S86'47'31"E C3 101.6T S8949'51"E 1340.54' m v� 5W i 16 CS 1/16 z_ elf w mr- f� c1f O r7 1 Q In o o a z m -L v; AREA = f c, 55.14 ACRES ys8' N C.D NZ9 cmil 5035lf' t-) '4 CV O O Z 31 32 _ E. LAKE HAZEL RD. 2 6 5 S89'57'01"E 1331,91' POINT OF w 1 16 N89'58'24W 1331.96' 5 1/4 BEGINNING 0 200 400 800 bNaL LA JV4D 5 G'P a CURVE TABLE lf��IZG{1QP•t��2 CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA BEARING CHORD ' ON W.\A?' C1 114.95' 140.00' 47'02'41" N34'29'08"W 111.75' C2 155.37' 110.00' 80'55'32" N29'30'30"E 142.77' ��no l ut l o n s C3 122.4T 220.00' 31'S3'39" N7T15'42"E 120.89' Land Surveying and Consulting C4 22.57' 144.67' 8'56'24" N56'50'40"E 22.55' MFRpJAri.ID�83642 12081 288-21340 (208)2882557 fax w Jan"Ulicns blz jw No.17 55 Lavender Heights Subdivision—H-2020-0009 EXHIBIT A Legal Description R-4 Zane Lavender Heights Subdivision A parcel of land located in the SW'/4 of Section 32, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian,Ada County, Idaho,more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an Aluminum cap monument marking the southwest corner of said Section 32, from which an Aluminum cap monument marking the northwest corner of the SW 1/4 of said section bears N 0'32'17"W a distance of 2700.11 feet; Thence S 89°57'01"E along the southerly boundary of said SW'/4 a distance of 1331.91 feet to a 518 inch iron pin monument marking the southwest corner of the SE X of said SW%: Thence N 0°09'52" W along the westerly boundary of said SE '/4 of the SW V4 a distance of 431.20 feet to a point; Thence N 69°55'45"W a distance of 262.71 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing N 69°55'45"W a distance of 240.59 feet to a point; Thence N 58°00'31"W a distance of 219.85 feet to a point of curvature; Thence a distance of 114.95 feet along the arc of a 140.00 foot radius curve right, said curve having a central angle of 47°02'41"and a long chord bearing N 34°29'08"W a distance of 111.75 feet to a point of tangency; Thence N 10°57'45"W a distance of 410.17 feet to a point of curvature; Thence a distance of 155.37 feet along the arc of a 110.00 foot radius curve right, said curve having a central angle of 80°55'32"and a long chord bearing N 29°30'30"E a distance of 142.77 feet to a point of tangency; Thence N 69'57'44"E a distance of 128.97 feet to a point; Thence N 83°47'06"E a distance of 26.72 feet to a point; Thence S 86°47'31"E a distance of 362.95 feetto a point of curvature; Thence a distance of 122.47 feet along the arc of a 220.00 foot radius curve left, said curve having a central angle of 31°53'39"and a long chord bearing N 77°15'42"E a distance of 120,89 feet to a point of tangency; Thence N 61°18'54"F a distance of 91.61 feet to a point of curvature; Thence a distance of 22.57 feet along the arc of a 144.67 foot radius curve left, said curve having a central angle of 8°56'24"and a long chord bearing N 56°50'40"E a distance of 22.55 feet to a point on the east boundary of the NW%of the SW%of said Section 32,also being the L�� y �Wfiops Lavender Heights Subdivision ��--'iana s„ noQ,�a cwumoq Revised R-4 Zone Job No.17-55 Page 1 of 3 Lavender Heights Subdivision Page i westerly boundary of Blackrock Subdivision No.1 as shown in Book 96 of Plats at Pages 12003 through 12008,records of Ada County, Idaho; Thence along said boundary S 0°08'26"E a distance of 101.67 feet to the northwest corner of the SE%of the SW%4 of said Section 32,said point also being the southwesterly corner of said Blackrock Subdivision No. 1; Thence along the northerly boundary of said SE '/A of the SW '/4, also being the southerly boundary of said Blackrock Subdivision No. 1 S 89°49'51"E a distance of 1340,54 feet to the northeasterly corner of said SE%of the SW%; Thence along the easterly boundary of said SE M. of the SW'/< S 0°12'02" W a distance of 707.92 feet to a point; Thence leaving said boundary N 89°47'24"W a distance of 141.89 feet to a point; Thence S 0n12'02"W a distance of 23.62 feet to a point; Thence S 39°56'09"W a distance of 31.50 feet to a point on a curve; Thence a distance of 26.69 feet along the arc of a 60.00 foot radius non-tangent curve left,said curve having a central angle of 25°29'17"and a long chord bearing N 62°48'29"W a distance of 26.47 feet to a point of tangency; Thence N 75°33'08"W a distance of 198.99 feet to a point; Thence N 14°26'52"E a distance of 109,38 feet to a point of curvature; Thence a distance of 24.92 feet along the arc of a 100.00 foot radius curve left, said curve having a central angle of 14'16'43"and a long chord bearing N 7*18'30"E a distance of 24.86 feet to a point of tangency; Thence N 0°10'09"E a distance of 412,38 feet to a point; Thence N 89°49'51"W a distance of 502.79 feet to a point of curvature; Thence a distance of 29.79 feet along the arc of a 60.00 foot radius curve left,said curve having a central angle of 28°23'02"and a long chard bearing S 75°58'38"W a distance of 29.42 feet to a point; Thence N 28°12'53"W a distance of 31.50 feet to a point; Thence N 89'49'51"W a distance of 296,01 feet to a point; Thence S 28'33'11"W a distance of 31.50 feet to a point on a curve; Thence a distance of 29.72 feet along the arc of a 60.00 foot radius non-tangent curve left,said curve having a central angle of 28°23'02'and a long chord bearing N 75°38'20"W a distance of 29,42 feet to a point of tangency; L.i3�"IEd�oolutii9ns Lavender Heights Subdivision and C—MIQ Revised R-4Zone Job No.17-55 Page 2 of 3 Lavender Heights Subdivision H-2020-0009 Page 2 Thence N 89°49'51"W a distance of 613.00 feet to a point of curvature; Thence a distance of 94.25 feet along the arc of a 60.00 foot radius curve left,said curve having a central angle of 90°00'00"and a long chord bearing S 45'10'09"W a distance of 84.85 feet to a point of tangency; Thence S 0°10'09"W a distance of 163.00 feet to a point of curvature; Thence a distance of 94.25 feet along the arc of a 60.00 foot radius curve left,said curve having a central angle of 90°00'00"and a long chord bearing S 44°49'51"E a distance of 84.85 feet to a point of tangency; Thence S 89°49'51"E a distance of 186.00 feet to a point; Thence S 0°10'09"W a distance 209.50 feet to a point of curvature; Thence a distance of 94.25 feet along the arc of a 60.00 foot radius curve left,said curve having a central angle of 90°00'00"and a long chord bearing S 44n49'51"E a distance of 84.85 feet to a point of tangency; Thence S 89'49'51"E a distance of 18.64 feet to a point; Thence S 0°09'52"E a distance of 122.87 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 16.37 acres,more or less. LA NO Clinton W. Hansen, PLS NpL 5`° S T s Land Solutions, PC �� z- F � Revised May 1,2020 a 1110 1f8 OS1 7-S o F tiTON W NPR ((has` ild:�Olal.Clogs Lavender Heights Subdivision v=`L+hd SurvrySng and Conambng Revised R-4 Zone Job No.17-55 Page 3 of 3 Lavender Heights Subdivision H-2020-0009 Page 3 Legal Description R-8 Zone Lavender Heights Subdivision A parcel of land located in the SW '/ of Section 32, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an Aluminum cap monument marking the southwest corner of said Section 32, from which an Aluminum cap monument marking the northwest corner of the SW % of said section bears N 0'32'17"W a distance of 2 70 0.11 feet; Thence S 89057'01"E along the southerly boundary of said SW'/4 a distance of 1331.91 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pin monument marking the southwest corner of the SE '/4 of said SW'/; Thence N 0009'52" W along the westerly boundary of said SE %4 of the SW '/4 a distance of 431.20 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence N 69°55'45"W a distance of 262.71 feet to a point; Thence N 0009'52°W a distance of 122.87 feet to a point; Thence N 89°49'51"W a distance of 18.64 feet to a point of curvature; Thence a distance of 94.25 feet along the arc of a 60.00 foot radius curve right, said curve having a central angle of 90000'00"and a long chord bearing N 44049,51"W a distance of 84.85 feet to a point of tangency; Thence N 0010'09" E a distance 209.50 feet to a point; Thence N 89°49'51"W a distance of 186.00 feet to a point of curvature; Thence a distance of 94.25 feet along the arc of a 60.00 foot radius curve right, said curve having a central angle of 90°00'00"and a long chord bearing N 44049'51"W a distance of 84.85 feet to a point of tangency; Thence N 0°10'09" E a distance of 163.00 feet to a point of curvature; Thence a distance of 94.25 feet along the arc of a 60.00 foot radius curve right, said curve having a central angle of 90000'00" and a long chord bearing N 45010'09" E a distance of 84.85 feet to a point of tangency; Thence S 89°49'51" E a distance of 613.00 feet to a point of curvature; Thence a distance of 29.72 feet along the arc of a 60.00 foot radius curve right, said curve having a central angle of 28023'02" and a long chord bearing S 75°38'20" E a distance of 29.42 feet to a point; Thence N 28'33'11" E a distance of 31.50 feet to a point; Lavender Heights Subdivision Land Surveying and Consulting Revised R-S Zone Job No. 17-55 Page Z of 3 Thence S 89°49'51" E a distance of 296.01 feet to a point; Thence S 28012'53" E a distance of 31.50 feet to a point on a curve; Thence a distance of 29.79 feet along the arc of a 60.00 foot radius non-tangent curve right, said curve having a central angle of 28023'02"and a long chord bearing N 75°58'38" E a distance of 29.42 feet to a point of tangency; Thence S 89°49'51" E a distance of 502.79 feet to a point; Thence S 0010'09" W a distance of 412.38 feet to a point of curvature; Thence a distance of 24.92 feet along the arc of a 100.00 foot radius curve right, said curve having a central angle of 14'16'43" and a long chord bearing S 7'18,30"W a distance of 24.86 feet to a point of tangency; Thence S 14°26'52"W a distance of 109.38 feet to a point; Thence S 75033'08" E a distance of 198.99 feet to a point of curvature; Thence a distance of 26.69 feet along the arc of a 60.00 foot radius curve right, said curve having a central angle of 25029'17"and a long chord bearing S 62048'29" E a distance of 26.47 feet to a point; Thence N 39°56'09" E a distance of 31.50 feet to a point; Thence N 0°12'02" E a distance of 23.62 feet to a point; Thence S 89°47'24" E a distance of 141.89 feet to a point on the easterly boundary of said SE '/ of the SW'/4; Thence along said easterly boundary S 0°12'02" W a distance of 563.26 feet to a point; Thence leaving said boundary N 89°58'24"W a distance of 103.29 feet to a point; Thence N 67°56'23" W a distance of 156.05 feet to a point; Thence N 14026'52" E a distance of 150.51 feet to a point; Thence N 15°05'05" W a distance of 51.58 feet to a point on a curve; Thence a distance of 30.93 feet along the arc of a 60.00 foot radius non-tangent curve right, said curve having a central angle of 29°31'57" and a long chord bearing S 89040,54" W a distance of 30.59 feet to a point of tangency; Thence N 75°33'08" W a distance of 598.93 feet to a point of curvature; Lavender Heights Subdivision Land SuNm)Irg and Consulting Revised R-8 Zone .fob No.17-55 Page 2 of 3 Thence a distance of 81.16 feet along the arc of a 100.00 foot radius curve right, said curve having a central angle of46°30'00"and a long chord bearing N 52018'08"W a distance of 78.95 feet to a point; Thence S 49'44'18"W a distance of 92.66 feet to a point; Thence S 14'26'52"W a distance of 137.03 feet to a point; Thence N 75°33'08" W a distance of 176.02 feet to a point; Thence N 70056'08"W a distance of 170.63 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 28.07 acres, more or less. NPR LAN4 Clinton W. Hansen, PLS T sG Land Solutions, PC Revised May 1, 2020 0 -c 11118 a F ,a�Cb ON W NP ..sllis� �t�� 5 Lavender Heights Subdivision k._�-Land surveying and ConswiOng Revised R-8 Zone Job No, 17-55 Page 3 of 3 Legal Description R-15 Zone Lavender Heights Subdivision A parcel of land located in the SW%of Section 32,Township 3 North,Range 1 East,Boise Meridian, Ada County,Idaho,more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an Aluminum cap monument marking the southwest corner of said Section 32,from which an Aluminum cap monument marking the northwest comer of the SW%of said section bears N 0'32'17"W a distance of 2700.11 feet; Thence S 89°57'01"E along the southerly boundary of said SW%a distance of 1331.91 feet to a 518 inch iron pin monument marking the southwest corner of the SE%of said SW'/.; Thence N 0°09'52"W along the westerly boundary of said SE'/I of the SW%,a distance of 431.20 feet; Thence S 70°56'08"E a distance of 170.63 feet to a point; Thence S 75°33'08"E a distance of 176.02 feet to the POINT of BEGINNING; Thence N 14°26'52"E a distance of 137.03 feet to a point; Thence N 49'44'18"E a distance of 92.66 feet to a point on a curve; Thence a distance of 81.16 feet along the are of a 100.00 foot radius non-tangent curve left,said curve having a central angle of 46°30'00"and a long chord bearing S 52°18'08'E a distance of 78.95 feet to a point of tangency; Thence S 75°33'08"E a distance of 598.93 feet to a point of curvature; Thence a distance of 30,93 feet along the are of a 60.00 foot radius curve left, said curve having a central angle of 29°31'57"and a long chord bearing N 89°40'54"E a distance of 30.59 feet to a point; Thence S 15°05'05"E a distance of 51.58 feet to a point; Thence S 14°26'52"W a distance of 150.51 feet to a point; Thence N 67'56'23"W a distance of 46.03 feet to a point; Thence N 75°33'08"W a distance of 734.37 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 3.25 acres,more or less. I- LA N�s NCO 15 T S,? G�4 Clinton W. Hansen,PLS o Land Solutions,PC a 11 z November25,2019 a 8 �j qrF Q F � \OQ 4Z 'LpCN W HP� La"d oofutions Lavender Heights Subdivision t—r"u MQC�Vd R-15 Zone Job No,17-55 Page 1 of 1 Lavender Heights Subdivision H-2020-0009 Page 6 Legal DescriRtion R-40 Zone Lavender Heights Subdivision A parcel of land located in the SE %of the SW%of Section 32,Township 3 North, Range 1 East,Boise Meridian,Ada County, Idaho,more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an Aluminum cap monument marking the southwest corner of said Section 32, from which an Aluminum cap monument marking the northwest comer of the SW%of said section bears N 0°32'17"W a distance of 2700.11 feet; Thence S 89°57'01"E along the southerly boundary of said SW%a distance of 1331.91 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pin monument marking the southwest corner of the SE % of said SW%. the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence N 0°09'52"W along the westerly boundary of said SE X of the SW%a distance of 431.20 feet to a point; Thence leaving said boundary S 70a56,08r'E a distance of 170.63 feet to a point; Thence S 75°33'08"E a distance of 910,39 feet to a point; Thence S 67°56'23"E a distance of 202.08 feet to a point; Thence S 89°58'24"E a distance of 103.29 feet to a point on the easterly boundary of said SE %of the SW%; Thence along said boundary S 0°12'02"W a distance of 73.00 feet to the southeast corner of said SE%of the SW'/4; Thence along the southerly boundary of said SE '/4 of the SW%N 89°58'24"W a distance of 1331.96 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 7.44 acres,more or less. Clinton W. Hansen, PLS ��°NAL T Nos Land Solutions, PC 4 9- s F December 3,2019 11118 of yTO'V W Lc7I7 CJ SC.p 1LJt j p ng Lavender Heights subdivision �� rand survc�nng ane co�miu�o R40 Zone Job No,17-55 Page 1 of 1 Lavender Heights Subdivision H-2020-0009 Page 7 EXHIBIT B GTY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXATION 31 32 LAVENDER HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 32, C 1/4 1/4 T.3N., R.1 E., BM.,ADA COUNTY,IDAHO _ Iw Qf N r O r N61'1$'54"E BLACKROCK SUBWASION NO. I w Z N83'47'06"E BOOK 96, PAGES 12003-12008 26.72' 362.95' 91.6i GK SO.08'26"E o N69'5T44"f 0 128.97' S86'47'31"E t;3 101.67' S8949'51"E 1340,54' N Sw 1 16 cs 1/16 cn N I O M r LO O p Z m : C1; a AREA = cj 55.14 ACRES CD �— NG9 ss, Ln 503n jV U N{O O 31 32 z_ E. LAKE HAZEL RD. 32 6 5 S89'57'01"E 1331.91' POINT OF w 1 i8 N89'58'24`W 1331.96' S 1/4 BEGINNING 0 200 400 800 Np,l LA A D s SG-P a 11`11 CURVE TABLE n N-f CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA BEARING CHORD O W N YY,N c1 114.95' 140.00' 47'02'41" N3429'08'W 111.75' C2 155.3T 110.00' 80'55'32" N29'30'30"E 142.7T L° n l uti ons C3 122.4T T1 220.00' 31'53'39" N75'42"E 120.89' Land Surveying and Consulting C4 22.57' 144.67' 8'S6'24" N56'S0'40"E 22.55' MER osfafv so 83642 12081 288-2040 120t3)2884557 fax w .lanowuticns.dz M NO.17-55 Lavender Heights Subdivision Page I Proposed Zoning Designations (date: 05/01/2020) CITY OF MERIDIAN REZONE LAVENDER HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 32, T.3N., R.1 E_, B.M.,ADA COUNTY, IDAHO n n n n n n r ST GROVE RD.2.17'W 27D211' � A .10.11, C7FR-4 ZONE NO ia n�.a Z3y' p C d ? a pa 4 0 S2 C `J omp 111 m A -y (l�{iyy+_ lip ntA ai r fn N N N .U.. r-1 M fZTI y E m UJ fTl o C1 I I N " ,.i ni x R-4 ZONE q m nz aelfr� w 01 n 2 "2 N0109'52'W 43£.20' 101.67's 5098'2fi� � U N N � � � —i T I�—I�—�—�r�i m m m m m m m y °" � I I I I I A O O O C p P p, g g g $ I I I I �I I ! I I I 137,gp 4yy. " I I i i gmY t38��' ti o g g c e - m 2 pS I _I_ I 1 1 n�5 R-4 ZONE R-4 ZONE I _ ors 90'1 412. RUT ZONE � m WN I � �GL LA kaSG�� I` 50'12'02'w 5fi3.26' SO'12'02'W 70792' n fi l l R-15 ZONE E I R-4 ZONE .i �� OF Land Surveying and Consulting ON W,1r1A MERIDIAN,D R3642 [2081 288-2040 12381 288 2557 fax w .landso4ottons.biz ca Kc.17-55 Lavender Heights Subdivision H-2020-0009 Page 2 Item #8. SEAL) CERTIFICATION OF SUMMARY . William L .M . Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho , hereby certifies that the summary below is true and complete and upon its publication will provide adequate notice to the public . r` William L. M. Nary, City Attorney SUMMARY OF CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO, 204888 An ordinance (H-2020 -0009 Lavender Heights Subdivision) for annexation of a parcel of land located in the SW '/a of Section 32, Township 3 North, Range I East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho as defined in the map published herewith; establishing and determining the land use zoning classification from RUT to R4 (Medium Low Density Residential) ; R4 (Medium Density Residential) ; R4 5 (Medium High Density Residential) ; and R40 (High Density Residential) Zoning Districts ; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; and providing an effective date . A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho . This ordinance shall be effective as of the date of publication of this summary. [Publication to include map as set forth in Exhibit B .] ANNEXATION ORDINANCE — Lavender Heights Subdivision (H 2O20 -0009) Page 3 of 3 Page 169 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ordinance No. 20-1889: An Ordinance Amending Meridian City Code Section 8-1-4(B)(1), Regarding Requirements for City of Meridian Use Zone Encroachment Permits; Adopting a Savings Clause; and Providing an Effective Date Page 179 Item#9. C� fIEN , IN4, IDAHG-. MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Emily Kane, City Attorney's Office Meeting Date: August 11, 2020 Presenter: Bill Parsons Estimated Time: 5 minutes Topic: Ordinance no. 20-NNNN: Amending Meridian City Code section 8-1-4, regarding requirements for City of Meridian Use Zone Encroachment Permits, adopting a savings clause; and providing an effective date. Recommended Council Action: It is the recommendation of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department that City Council waive the second and third readings, and pass this ordinance to be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. Background: Through a license agreement with the Ada County Highway District,the City of Meridian administers Use Zone Encroachment Permits for sidewalks in downtown Meridian. Under a UZEP, business owners may put temporary encroachments (dining tables, chairs, umbrellas, planters, signs, merchandise displays, etc.) in the use zone,the part of the sidewalk closest to the buildings. Adjacent business owners are eligible to obtain a UZEP for the sidewalk directly adjacent to their business. The provisions outlining the submittals required as part of a UZEP application require the applicant to submit an affidavit of legal interest from the owner of the adjacent property for which the UZEP is sought. This practice was meant to ensure that the owner is aware of the use of the sidewalk adjacent to the owned property, but it has also had the unintended effect of making the application process slower and more cumbersome, an impact which outweighs the benefit of the practice. This impact has been exacerbated by the challenges facing downtown business owners due to the COVID-19 crisis. Deleting this provision would be useful to business owners and would not have a measurable detrimental impact on the public. For this reason,we recommend that City Council pass this ordinance. Page 180 Item#9. CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 20-1889 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, HOAGLUN, PERREAULT, STRADER AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 8-1-4(B)(1), REGARDING REQUIREMENTS FOR CITY OF MERIDIAN USE ZONE ENCROACHMENT PERMITS, ADOPTING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the Centers for Disease Control ("CDC") and the Central District Health Department have issued guidelines for preventing exposure to COVID-19 by maintaining six feet (6') of distance between people in order to reduce the spread of COVID-19 through respiratory droplets produced when an infected person coughs or sneezes; WHEREAS,restaurants and bars in Meridian are pursuing ways to provide adequate space for social distancing between their patrons, and may wish to do so by expanding service areas into adjacent outdoor spaces; and WHEREAS,the City will continue to require Use Zone Encroachment Permits in order to ensure public safety and compliance with all applicable codes through staff review, but in order to facilitate reopening, finds it in the best interest of the business community and people of Meridian to eliminate certain application requirements; NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That Meridian City Code section 8-1-4(B)(1) shall be amended to read as follows: 8-1-4: REQUIREMENTS FOR ENCROACHMENTS IN THE USE ZONE: B. City Of Meridian Use Zone Encroachment Permit: 1. Application: Application for a City of Meridian use zone encroachment permit shall be made to the Director. Such application may be made only by the person owning or renting the property directly adjacent to the use zone on which the proposed encroachments are to be placed. Such application shall include: a. A completed application on the form provided by the Planning Division; b. Detailed site plan including locations of all existing and proposed encroachments; c. Photographs or illustrations showing all proposed encroachments; d. Proof of written notice to abutting property owners; e. Application fee as set forth in the fee schedule of the Planning Division; fl. Affi&vit of legal interest in the pr-opei4y abutting the use zone where the propose A efier-eaehments are to be plaeed; g. Proof of an insurance policy with minimum limits of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00)per person bodily injury, five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00)per COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER ORDINANCE PAGE page 181 Item #9. occurrence bodily injury, and one hundred thousand dollars ($ 100 ,000 . 00) per occurrence property damage, naming the City as additional insured ; and h . Other materials as may be reasonably required by the Planning Director. Section 2 . That all ordinances, resolutions, orders, or parts thereof or in conflict with this ordinance are hereby voided. Section 3. That this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 18th day of August , 2020 . APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 18th day of August , 2020 . APPROVED : ATTEST . Robert E. Simison, Mayor Chris Johnson, City Clerk STATEMENT OF MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY AS TO ADEQUACY OF SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO, 204889 The undersigned, William L.M . Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that he is the legal advisor of the City and has reviewed a copy of the below summary of Ordinance no . 20- 1889 of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and has found the same to be true and complete and provides adequate notice to the public pursuant to Idaho Code § 50 -901A(3 ) . DATED this Ii"' day of NuQ U44 , 2020 . William L.M. Nary, City Attorney PUBLISHED SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO I. C . § 50 -901A CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO: 204889 An ordinance amending Meridian City Code section 844, regarding requirements for City of Meridian Use Zone Encroachment Permits , adopting a savings clause; and providing an effective date . COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER ORDINANCE PAGE Page 182 C � wE N DIAN --- IDAHO Future Meeting Topics Meeting Notes: