The URL can be used to link to this page

2020-08-11 Work Session WE IDIAN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday,August 11, 2020 at 4:30 PM Minutes VIRTUAL MEETING INSTRUCTIONS Limited seating is available at City Hall Consider joining the meeting virtually: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86787561107 To call in: 1-669-900-6833 Webinar ID: 867 8756 1107 PRESENT Councilwoman Jessica Perreault Councilman Joe Borton Councilman Brad Hoaglun Councilman Treg Bernt Councilwoman Liz Strader Councilman Luke Cavener Mayor Robert E. Simison ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] Motion to approve made by Councilman Hoaglun, Seconded by Councilman Bernt Voting Yea: Councilwoman Perreault, Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Bernt, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 1. Approve Minutes of July 28, 2020 Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of July 28, 2020 City Council Regular Meeting 3. Final Order for Allmon Subdivision (H-2020-0071) by Dean Waite, Todd Campbell Construction, Inc., Located at 5875 and 5885 N. Locust Grove Rd. 4. Final Order for Hill's Century Farm North (H-2020-0077) by Kody Daffer, Brighton Development, Inc., Generally Located on the East Side of S. Eagle Rd. and South of E.Amity Rd. 5. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Gyro Subdivision (H-2020-0061) by Tealey's Land Surveying, Located at 3030 E. Magic View Dr. 6. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Hill's Century Farm North (H-2020-0080) by Kody Daffer, Brighton Development, Inc., Generally Located South of E.Amity Rd. and East of S. Eagle Rd. 7. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Quartet Northeast (H-2020-0017) by Brighton Development, Inc., Located at 4020 &4340 N. Black Cat Rd. 8. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Quartet Southeast (H-2020-0018) by Brighton Development, Inc., Located at 4020 and 4340 N. Black Cat Rd. 9. Agreement Between City of Meridian and Envision 360 Inc. to Accept Payment in Lieu of Installing Streetlights at 1351 E. Fairview Ave. in the Estimated Amount of $8465.00 10. Agreement Between the City of Meridian and Nampa Meridian Irrigation District to Authorize the City to Discharge Water from Well 32 in to the Ridenbaugh Canal for a Designated Period 11. Resolution No. 20-2221: A Resolution Authorizing the Donation of Surplus Computers and Equipment to the West Ada School District. 12. Resolution No. 20-2222: A Resolution Authorizing the Fifth Continuance of a Local Disaster Emergency Declaration And Its Terms for an Additional Thirty (30) Days; Authorizing the Continued Immediate Expenditure of Public Money to Safeguard Life, Health and Property; and Providing an Effective Date. 13. AP Invoices for Payment- 07-30-20 - $6,225.85 14. AP Invoices for Payment- 07-31-20 - $138,886.09 15. AP Invoices for Payment- 08-12-20 - $546,760.96 ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] 16. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Delano Subdivision (H-2019-0027) by Boll Cook Investments, LLC, Located at 14120 W. Jasmine Ln. and 2800 E. Jasmine Ln. Motion to approve made by Councilman Borton,Seconded by Councilman Hoaglun. Voting Yea: Councilwoman Perreault, Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Bernt, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener ACTION ITEMS 17. License and Management Agreement Between Western Ada Recreation District and the City of Meridian for Maintenance and Operation of Lakeview Golf Course Motion to approve made by Councilman Hoaglun, Seconded by Councilwoman Perreault, Voting Yea: Councilwoman Perreault, Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Bernt, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 18. Assignment of Lease Between Western Ada Recreation District and the City of Meridian for the Provision of Golf Course Operations at City of Meridian's Lakeview Golf Course Motion to approve made by Councilman Hoaglun, Seconded by Councilwoman Perreault. Voting Yea: Councilwoman Perreault, Councilman Borton, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilman Bernt, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS [Action Item] 19. Fire Department: Discussion of Potential Fire Stations 7 and 8 EXECUTIVE SESSION 20. Per Idaho Code 74-206A(1)(a) To deliberate on a labor contract offer or to formulate a counteroffer. Vacated ADJOURNMENT 5:45 pm Item#1. Meridian City Council Work Session August 11, 2020. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 4:33 p.m., Tuesday, August 11, 2020, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Joe Borton, Luke Cavener, Treg Bernt, Jessica Perreault, Brad Hoaglun and Liz Strader. Also present: Chris Johnson, Adrienne Weatherly, Bill Nary, Mark Niemeyer, Scott Colaianni, Joe Bongiorno and Dean Willis. Roll-call Attendance: Liz Strader _X_ Joe Borton _X_ Brad Hoaglun _X_Treg Bernt X Jessica Perreault _X Luke Cavener _X_ Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Council, I will call this meeting to order. For the record it is Tuesday, August 11th, 2020, at 4:33 p.m. We will begin tonight's meeting with roll call attendance. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Simison: And just for those who are following along at home, Council Woman Perreault is in the room and we are working to get her computer updated so she can log into Zoom. So, she will be physically or -- or pictorially join us in Zoom. Item -- the next item on the agenda is the adoption of the agenda. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, I move that we adopt the agenda as presented. Bernt: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as published. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Those opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] 1. Approve Minutes of July 28, 2020 Work Session Page 4 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page 2 of 24 2. Approve Minutes of July 28, 2020 City Council Regular Meeting 3. Final Order for Allmon Subdivision (H-2020-0071) by Dean Waite, Todd Campbell Construction, Inc., Located at 5875 and 5885 N. Locust Grove Rd. 4. Final Order for Hill's Century Farm North (H-2020-0077) by Kody Daffer, Brighton Development, Inc., Generally Located on the East Side of S. Eagle Rd. and South of E. Amity Rd. 5. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Gyro Subdivision (H-2020- 0061) by Tealey's Land Surveying, Located at 3030 E. Magic View Dr. 6. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Hill's Century Farm North (H-2020-0080) by Kody Daffer, Brighton Development, Inc., Generally Located South of E. Amity Rd. and East of S. Eagle Rd. 7. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Quartet Northeast (H-2020- 0017) by Brighton Development, Inc., Located at 4020 & 4340 N. Black Cat Rd. 8. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Quartet Southeast (H-2020- 0018) by Brighton Development, Inc., Located at 4020 and 4340 N. Black Cat Rd. 9. Agreement Between City of Meridian and Envision 360 Inc. to Accept Payment in Lieu of Installing Streetlights at 1351 E. Fairview Ave. in the Estimated Amount of $8465.00 10. Agreement Between the City of Meridian and Nampa Meridian Irrigation District to Authorize the City to Discharge Water from Well 32 in to the Ridenbaugh Canal for a Designated Period 11. Resolution No. 20-2221: A Resolution Authorizing the Donation of Surplus Computers and Equipment to the West Ada School District. 12. Resolution No. 20-2222: A Resolution Authorizing the Fifth Continuance of a Local Disaster Emergency Declaration And Its Terms for an Additional Thirty (30) Days; Authorizing the Continued Immediate Expenditure of Public Money to Safeguard Life, Health and Property; and Providing an Effective Date. 13. AP Invoices for Payment - 07-30-20 - $6,225.85 14. AP Invoices for Payment - 07-31-20 - $138,886.09 Page 5 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page 3 of 24 15. AP Invoices for Payment - 08-12-20 - $546,760.96 Simison: Next item on the agenda is the Consent Agenda. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: On the Consent Agenda we have Item 5, we have a letter representing a neighborhood -- some neighbors who would like that -- to have us take another look at the language that we put into the Conclusion -- Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law, so we would like to pull Item 5 for Delano Subdivision, H-2019-0027, and take that up as a separate item and by doing so, Mr. Mayor, I would move that we approve the Consent Agenda and the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest. Bernt: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to remove Item 5 and to approve the remainder of the Consent Agenda. Is there any discussion on this item? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] 16. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Delano Subdivision (H- 2019-0027) by Boll Cook Investments, LLC, Located at 14120 W. Jasmine Ln. and 2800 E. Jasmine Ln. Simison: As was mentioned, Item 5 was moved off of the Consent Agenda, so we will now consider that an action item. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Mr. Hoaglun. Hoaglun: We -- we had received a letter from an attorney representing some neighbors from an action we took -- I believe it was last week and wanting to ensure that the language that -- was accurately recorded. In reading through that it was my understanding that that was what we had taken action on in that way -- may not have been the exact words, but I don't know, Mr. Nary, legal counsel, did you see anything that would give us an issue where it was not what -- that we are not on the same page somehow regarding that? Nary: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, in looking at it, again, I think what they are requesting is slightly more specific. I don't really see a substantive difference between Page 6 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page 4 of— what they are asking for and what's already listed in the findings. Again, the Council's direction was to direct that that become an emergency -- emergency access only. It be constructed that way as part of phase one. That it will remain as an emergency access only and, basically, the Council's desire is it remain that way. So, I don't really see a substantive difference, but it's certainly the Council's call. If you would like amended findings we would, essentially, ask -- get that direction. We, then, remove them, amend the findings again, bring them back next week. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I guess maybe a point of clarification for Mr. Nary. What is the purpose of amending the language to the 20 foot specification? I -- am I missing something? I just wasn't tracking why that change was needed. Nary: I'm having -- Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Strader, I'm having a little computer problem pulling up that specific language. My assumption is is that the narrower the width the least likely to convert that in the future. But the reality is it's unlikely to be converted in the future, unless for some specific reason a future neighbor, a future adjoining property owner, were to petition ACHD to change the roadway configuration. That's really something that is impossible to anticipate at this point that that could occur. Ultimately, as was previously discussed -- I mean ACHD has the ultimate authority on the road. I think the assumption is is the more constrictive the property is from a construction standpoint, the less likely that will change and it will become clearer to people or less obvious to people that this is a roadway. But other than that I don't know, really, other purpose. I think the intent of the Council is clear in what -- in your findings, but certainly there is no objection if you want it to be more specific. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: Mr. Nary, what do you recommend? It's a matter of a week -- what -- we are not changing terms. We are clarifying the decision to make sure it's accurate. Is your recommendation that it's good to go as is or an additional week would help you be sure that it's exactly what the motion was. Nary: Well, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Borton, I -- I think the -- I think the document is what your motion was. I -- I actually wrote those based on your motion. So, I think they are accurate the way they are now. But, again, I have no objection if you want more specificity that they are asking for, that's certainly your prerogative, but I think it's clear enough in my opinion. But, again, I -- I have no objection if you think an additional enhancement to that is better. That's perfectly fine. I still think it's consistent with your motion. So, I don't have any objection either way. Page 7 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page 5- — Borton: Okay. Thanks. Simison: Council, do I have a motion based upon that -- those comments from our Legal Department? Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: If there is no additional discussion, I move we approve the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, for Delano Subdivision, H-2018-0027. Hoaglun: Second. Bernt: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 5. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. ACTION ITEMS 17. License and Management Agreement Between Western Ada Recreation District and the City of Meridian for Maintenance and Operation of Lakeview Golf Course Simison: And with that we will move on to Item No. 17 under Action Items. So, license agreement between Western Ada Recreation District and the City of Meridian for maintenance and operations of Lakeview Golf Course and I will -- we do have Mr. Wardle on for any comments from the Council, if there is any further information. I know there was a request last week by Councilman Cavener to take public testimony at this point in time. I was not going to entertain public testimony. I think there will be plenty of steps in the process for the future for engaging the public in other elements as we move forward working cooperatively with the Board in elements and I think that that would be more appropriate than on this specific agreement at this time. But I will open this up for any comments from Council at this point in time and we have staff and Shaun to provide feedback if necessary. Or, if not, I would be happy to entertain a motion. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we approve the license and management agreement between Western Ada Recreation District and the City of Meridian for maintenance and operation of Lakeview Golf Course. Page 8 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page 6- — Perreault: Second. Cavener: Second. Simison: Okay. I have a motion and a couple seconds to approve the license management agreement. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, Clerk will call the roll. Roll call: Bernt, yea; Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, yea; Perreault, yea. Simison: Okay. All ayes. Motion passes. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. 18. Assignment of Lease Between Western Ada Recreation District and the City of Meridian for the Provision of Golf Course Operations at City of Meridian's Lakeview Golf Course Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I would move that the assignment of lease between Western Ada Recreation District and the City of Meridian for the provision of golf course operations at City of Meridian's Lakeview Golf Course be approved. Perreault: Second. Simison: Okay. I have a motion and a second to approve the assignment of lease between WARD and the City of Meridian. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, Clerk will call the roll. Roll call: Bernt, yea; Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, yea; Perreault, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS [Action Item] 19. Fire Department: Discussion of Potential Fire Stations 7 and 8 Simison: We are now moving on to Item 19 under Department/Commission Reports, the Fire Department discussion of potential Fire Station 7 and 8. As I turn this over to Chief Page 9 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page , - — Niemeyer and his team, just a reminder, this was an item that was discussed during the budget -- this was an item that was discussed during the budget hearings. Sorry. I'm trying to find that right volume level for those away. But it's a continuation of that conversation, so we can get an idea about whether or not this -- the design of two stations would be included as part of the upcoming FY-21 budget process. So, with that I will turn this over to Chief Niemeyer. Niemeyer: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, and good evening, Council. Some of you personally and some of you virtually. Really appreciate the time tonight and I hope this will be the first of many discussions we have with regards to the future of fire stations, specifically Station 7 and Station 8. As the Mayor alluded to, we have had our staff working on this for several months now. Certainly COVID took a turn for us as far as being able to present this to you. We feel very comfortable in the information and data we are sharing and look forward to a conversation following this presentation. So, with that, just a review of our response time standards. That's been asked in the past. So, for Council in 2015 the Fire Department conducted a master plan. We used GSI to -- to perform that master plan and part of that was multiple stakeholders that were involved in the input with regards, really, to response times and services that we provide to the community. The outcome of that in 2016, December, was that the Council unanimously adopted the following standards for the Fire Department. A 90 second chute time. Some people call that a turnout time and for a definition that is the time from when the bells go off in our stations until the time our apparatus rolls out of the stations and responds to the call. So, we are receiving that call from dispatch and our goal is 90 seconds or less to get out the door and be responding to that emergency. Our travel time for the city is five minutes. We heard everything in our -- from our community stakeholder group from we want them there in 30 seconds to whenever they get there. And so as a -- as a group and as a City Council, we selected five minutes as the travel time standard that we have for the Fire Department to respond to emergencies and, then, also to maintain 80 percent or greater response reliability. Response reliability means how often our apparatus assigned to a station can respond to a call within that jurisdiction. So, for example, Station 1 has a coverage area. How often does the apparatus from Station 1 respond to Station 1's area. That's reliability. We also as part of that plan engage with our partners and in addition to what we did specific to Meridian, also worked to strengthen our mutual aid and our mutual aid agreements. The Fire Department and the Fire Department response is a system of mutual aid. When our crews are tied up on calls here in the city and other calls come in for service, we do have to rely on mutual aid from other cities, whether it's Boise, Nampa, Eagle, Kuna or Star and, likewise, they can rely on us at times when they are out of service. So, we did strengthen that mutual aid partnership in 2015. So, our review of what we are doing today, to give you an idea of our performance -- I didn't mention earlier the dispatch processing time, but that's a piece and a component of the overall response time. This applies for both Police and Fire. So, when folks call 911 there is a call taker in the Ada County Dispatch Center. They take the initial information. They put that information over to a dispatcher. That dispatcher goes through a process of identifying which units are going to respond to that call for service. Right now the average time it takes to do that entire process is a minute and 54 seconds. Our chute time average in the last six months is 70 seconds. So, we are below our average and that's a testament to our crews. I have Page 10 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page 8-— always said that's a response to the citizens. When they call for help how quickly do we begin that response and getting out of the station. So, certainly, our firefighters are doing their part and doing a great job and this is the one piece that we feel we can control the most when it comes to an overall response time. Our travel time. Currently last six months we are at five minutes and three seconds. So, we are maintaining really close to that goal that we set back in 2016 of five minutes. This does fluctuate. There is so many dependents as far as the travel time and how long it takes us to get Point -- to Point A to Point B that includes travel. It includes weather. There are several factors that come into a travel time. Certainly as we talk about roadway, roadway construction, hopefully, roadway growth in the future and our ability to move throughout the city in a more timely manner will be important conversations to have. And, then, our effective response force. Again, this isn't a piece I mentioned in the earlier slide, but this is how long it takes us to assemble all the units needed to respond to a structure fire. We want to try and keep this under nine minutes if we can. You will see we are at eight minutes and 26 seconds. When we do have a fire we have three engines, one truck, and one battalion chief respond to that call. We are able currently to meet an effective response force and that just means the right number of people on scene to effectively do the job. Chris, I might need some help. The computer over here is thinking. I apologize for the pause there. Apologies, Council. It looks like Microsoft PowerPoint is trying to send the issue to Microsoft right now. Four. It wasn't a black screen, but that's okay. If we can move through it I can make it work. Council, I will take you back one screen. Unfortunately, it's black. We are having some computer issues over here. So, I will have to e-mail you out the video that I have. But in a nutshell this was a video produced by NIST. NIST is the National Institute for Safety and Technology and they have done studies on how fire grows given an environment and what you would have seen in this is over a four minute time frame the fire growing exponentially to where we get what is known as flashover. So, as the fire builds in a room, the superheated gases and smoke rise to the ceiling and slowly lower to the floor and over time you are going to get what you may commonly see as backdraft in the movie or flashover in our world. That is the concern we have. That is why we are trying to get on scene as quickly as we can to eliminate that phenomenon to where that fire is going to rapidly spread. There is -- there is a well known fact to the science community that have studied this that a fire grows every -- it doubles in size for every minute after a certain time frame and that time frame is anywhere from four to five minutes. Also on the medical side when it comes to response time why five minutes is important and why we set that as our standard. In a cardiac arrest or other trauma time is in seconds, not hours, not minutes, not days, but seconds truly do matter and it's not an over exaggeration. When we are in a cardiac arrest situation the sooner we can get on scene, perform CPR or perform defibrillation and, then, perform AILS interventions to try and turn that situation around the better. The longer it takes to get there, the harder it is to make that issue better and so we have that both on the medical side, the trauma side, and we have it on the fire side as well. So, I will have to send that video out to you in a separate e-mail. To give you an idea --for some of Council you have seen this before, as far as the NIST study and how fire grows and the behavior of fire. If we look at the review of growth that we have had -- that we are facing in response for the Fire Department, you can see these are -- these are approved growth areas. You can see in the southeast and in the northwest we have had pretty significant growth. We have done Page 11 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page 9 of— some anecdotal studies, if you will, to say when we add a subdivision what kind of growth do we see in our call volume. As we examined and evaluated the growth of the Oaks Subdivision, as one example, and there are some variables here certainly -- that has increased our call volume by about 40 runs per year. So, as you add more and more and more subdivisions or more growth on the business and -- and commercial side, we know that's going to increase our call volume. Next slide. So, here is an example of what we are seeing in the northwest area of our city on -- the slide on the left is growth that's been approved. You will recognize that as the Oaks Subdivision and, then, the slide on the right is from Chief Bongiorno and this is some of the engagement and interactions he's had with other developers who are interested in bringing projects to Meridian. We are trying to track that as far as growth that's been approved and, then, growth that is in -- in the projections and potential growth. Next slide. If you look in the south, same thing. You will see the growth that's been approved, which is going to increase our call volume and, then, projected growth based on early discussions with developers that are looking to grow in the south side. There is a direct correlation between population growth and call volume growth. So, on the left we have population growth from 2002 to 2019. You will see a very similar correspondence to incidents per year as that population grows. I will point out one little blip downward and that was in 2015, 2016 in our incidents. You can see that we trended down. The reason for that is our EMS system got together and determined who was going to respond to what calls, especially in the non-acute calls and we made a change in our dispatch processing where Ada County Ambulance only responded to a certain call type. That resulted in a reduction across the board for fire responses decreasing slightly, but since that time you can see that our trend is back up and you can see a fairly steep increase from 2018 to 2019. Our analysis shows that we don't anticipate that trend to reverse. As our population continues to grow, so, too, will our call volume and consistently between the two. So, adding stations -- what does adding stations due to response times. We talked about the two areas, the northwest and the south. On the left-hand side you can see what we can do today. The green is the five minute travel time. This was produced by our GIS team. They do amazing work. The yellow is a seven minute travel time and the nine is a -- is a nine minute travel time. On the right-hand side, if you were to add a station in the northwest and a station in the south, you can see that our southern coverage we can get to in five minutes and the northwest coverage we can get to in five minutes and we can certainly create these maps in any way you choose, adding one station, adding both. But you can see the difference between the two slides and what we can do today and with the growth occurring in these two areas by adding stations what we could do moving forward. Next slide. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, if I could ask a question. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Chief, back to that -- slides going back that shows the response times, back -- what's the time of day that this is? Is this on average? It's much easier to get to one part of town at 5.00 a.m. than it is at 5.00 p.m. So, I'm curious what -- the time of day that these models are based on. Page 12 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page 10 of— Niemeyer: Great question. Thanks, Councilman Cavener. What--what GIS did with this -- they didn't pick a time of day to pick. What they picked is they use roadway speeds. I don't believe they even used traffic counts. So, it's simply the roadway system and the roadway speeds and how we can get to certain places in a certain amount of time. I think the time of day question that's a really deep -- and I think our GIS folks will tell you this -- that is a really deep analysis -- analysis that even ESRI has had trouble predicting. When you bring in time of day, you bring in traffic patterns, you bring in road construction, all those other factors that I mentioned -- this doesn't bring in any of that. This is simply roadways and station locations. They do bring in speed limits on the roadways. So, they do bring in that estimation. Cavener: Okay. Thank you. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I guess a general question. If we look at that map do we have existing development that already falls outside of the five minute fire response time or -- or is it primarily a question of expanding fire stations to open up areas for new development? Or both? Niemeyer: Council Woman Strader -- Council Woman Strader, great question. It's both right now. Certainly in the south we do have some development that we are not able to get to -- there we go. We are not able to get to in five minutes. There is a lot of development in the southeast corner that we simply can't get to in five minutes. There is some development certainly going on around the 77 acre regional park that we can't get to in five minutes. In the northwest corner you can see this area and these areas highlighted in yellow, those are unachievable within five minutes currently. The Owyhee High School, as we all know, is going into this area in here that we won't be able to get to in five minutes and the thing about schools -- anecdotally speaking I don't know what it is about Cherry Lane and McDermott right now, but that seems to be where a lot of wrecks are that I come across. In the last 12 months I have come across five pretty significant T-bone accidents at that intersection. I think as we talked about schools going in, especially a high school, we talked about increased traffic and I know that's something that Chief Lavey and I talked about as we were discussing that Owyhee High School and the plan for it and the roadway system around it and that concern of increased car accidents, which we also respond to. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Strader: Thank you. Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Page 13 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page 11 of 24 Perreault: Chief, isn't that intersection a two way intersection? Stop -- stop signs on McDermott, but not on Cherry? Niemeyer: Correct. Perreault: Yeah. Niemeyer: Correct. Yes. So, looking at cost and I -- I would like to try and keep this focused on two different aspects. The first is something the Mayor alluded to and that was discussion during budget hearing regarding the design of fire stations. Certainly this is within our impact fee schedule. This is something that we work -- work with our impact fee committee on. We knew that this was going to be a development issue at some point within that impact fee study. So, for the FY-21 budget request, the request was to design two fire stations and the reason we brought that forward is that there is some cost savings by doing both designing -- designs at the same time. We anticipate really very similar stations. As far as the floor plan goes, we expect it to be the same station, because the land is a little bit different site to site. We anticipate there is going to be some changes with regards to elevations, landscaping, etcetera. So, we --we believe this is somewhat an independent issue to the discussion around building the stations and staffing the stations. Personally as the chief I like to have something that's shovel ready. I can tell you we learned a lot through Station 6. 1 think Councilman Cavener and those that were on Council at that time would understand that. We learned a lot about the timing, about the process, about the phases you go through when you go through a project like this and we believe we have a very good plan to meet those timelines, so we can stay exactly on track to what we commit to and that first step is really getting this design work done. It's a lot of the annexation work. It's a lot of the permitting work. And it's really going through that process of designing the floor plan and the elevations. That was the request for FY- 21. In addition to purchasing the land in northwest Meridian. We have land assigned and allocated in the south. The rural fire district purchase four acres that's tied in with a 77 acre regional park. I believe we have talked about that in the past. The land that we are looking at in the northwest is just north of the proposed Owyhee High School --or Owyhee High School that's being built. We do have a development agreement with -- with the developer of that to have two acres donated and, then, to purchase two acres and I think we covered that during the budget hearing as far as the cost of that. That's in the Gander Creek Subdivision. So, this is the -- the request for FY-21 and I can certainly pause here to discuss the idea of designing two at the same time, what that savings potentially looks like, or I can continue on. Mr. Mayor, I will take your -- your cue on that. Simison: Council, any questions at this point in time in the presentation? Councilman Bernt. Bernt: Mr. Mayor, I got -- I got numerous, but I'm still wanting to listen a little bit more. Simison: Okay. Niemeyer: With regards to -- Page 14 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page 12—— Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. And I'm not sure who this question is posed to. I hope whoever is the most equipped to answer it can -- can help me. When I'm looking at this information that's in front of us on the slide, I'm trying to understand how that aligns with the direction that it came out of our -- of our budget hearing. Am I -- am I misremembering? Was this included as part of the 2021 budget or not? Simison: Councilman Cavener, yes, it was. Everything you see in here is -- this was a conversation about whether or not to take something out. Cavener: Got it. Thank you. Appreciate the clarification. Niemeyer: Just to add to that, Councilman Cavener, really good question. The initial budget request and what we had in our CFP was 1.2 million dollars for overall design. As we have worked with the architect, this piece specifically that you see before you is for the design -- schematic design of those two stations. The additional amount that would equate to 1.2 million moves into the construction phase where the architect is involved in the bidding, et cetera. So, this is the actual amount that would be expended in FY-21 . If we choose to move to construction in FY-22, that full amount that we have requested would, then, move into year two. It looks like that probably makes sense as I'm talking there. Cavener: Thank you. Niemeyer: And, then, FY 22, if we move forward with construction, if we move into phase two of these projects, we would be looking to purchase the two fire engines. It takes about 12 months to get those fire engines built. They come from Pierce. That's the manufacturer that we use for our fire engines. We would go to bid packages, pre- construction estimating, budget preparation. That would be October through March and, then, start construction of the first station sometime in April and the second station in June if that's the direction that we move forward as a city. That total impact fund --fiscal impact for that year, FY-22, would be 5.786 million dollars. We have been working very closely with Todd Lavoie, our CFO, on what our impact fee balance looks like and we certainly have projections to that and I think that -- that we would look forward to another conversation with Council and bring in Todd to talk about how that funding piece would be working through these projects. FY-23, if we continue to move forward, this would be the year that we hire the staff. This is certainly the biggest lift in a project like this. This is not impact fee eligible. We have looked into a FEMA grant. It's called a SAFER grant. It's through the assistance to firefighters. There is an opportunity for us to apply for that. We would do that. Chief, I'm going to look to you. I forgot to include this. What month would we -- '22. So, we would make the application in '22 and we would know in September prior to going into the FY-23 budget year. We are eligible for up to two million dollars. That is a 25 percent cost share the first two years that the city would be Page 15 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page ——— responsible for and, then, a 65 percent cost share in year three. So, that is a three year grant application. We also have engaged with our rural fire district. We understand that the station out south, if and when that gets built, there is certainly some coverage areas to the district as well. They have shown an interest in having the discussion with the city about a potential cost share for that. Certainly we don't have numbers to present at this time, but as a -- as a possibility or option there is that partnership that the district is willing to entertain. That I think I just want to make the point here that -- that, again, lessons learned from Station 6 and Chief Butterfield and Bongiorno have been heavily involved in this. We have laid out a process and a mapping process to where we know exactly how long different aspects of these projects would take. So, this is our way to stay on course, stay on time, and deliver. So, we have -- again, this is more of a visual to at least look at the detail in which we look at these projects to present them to you. As considerations we have reached out to the architect, worked exclusively with them to talk about design savings if we do both stations at once. There is another supplemental piece to this that we are not bringing tonight, I think it's for further discussion, and that would be designing in police substations or precincts as part of a fire station design in the future. We have certainly worked with Chief Lavey and his staff on that -- that concept. There seems to be agreement that the concept makes sense. We still have work to do there to determine how exactly that would be done. But if we were to incorporate a precinct in one or both of these stations in the future, there is certainly some more cost savings we can find in designing all of it at the same time. We will continue to work with Chief Lavey on that. And, then, on the construction side we did reach out to ESI. They were the general contractors for Station 6. We engaged with them and said if we were to build two at the same time is there any kind of savings whatsoever by doing so and what they anticipate is a five to ten percent cost savings per station. That's anywhere 450,000 and 900,000 dollars per station potentially that could be saved by building two stations at the same time. Mentioned the AFC grant a little bit. We are eligible for up to two million dollars. The grant funding, again, we would match 25 percent in year one and two and, then, 65 percent in year three. We have -- we have spoken with Finance about the possibility of a grant. Talking to Todd he's all for it. He said it wouldn't be an issue. We have managed grants in the past. So, this certainly is a possibility moving forward. Also did reach out to the Idaho Survey and Rating Bureau. This is otherwise known as ISO ratings. ISO ratings are in Idaho. The ISRB ratings do affect insurance premiums. Currently we are at a class three. We just got re-rated not too long ago. We have been a class three for several years now. In Idaho there are no class one departments. It's the best you can get. Two class two departments currently and that's Boise and Idaho Falls. I did ask them if we add Station 7 and 8, as well as a second battalion that's a part of this conversation, where does that put us and that would put us in a class two rating. The kicker is I can't -- I can't promise anything as far as insurance premiums. I reached out to the insurance agent. It's the underwriters that develop those premiums. The message I got from the insurance companies is there would be pretty small effect on homeowner premiums, but they do anticipate there would be a positive effect on our business community and the business premiums and that's pretty standard in the insurance companies that I reached out to and talked to. Okay. The other question that got asked and discussed during the budget hearing is which station comes first and I have maintained and I will continue to somewhat maintain it's a flip of the coin. There is pros and cons for either area, the northwest or the Page 16 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page ——— south, but as we analyzed it within our Fire Department, we looked at four different factors that we felt are very important relevant to this conversation. First one being how much ground do we need to cover within each of these areas. If you look at the south currently we have two fire stations that covers half of our response district south of 1-84. Those two stations are Station 4 and Station 6. The concern I have with Station 4 is the reliability right now is at 80 percent. Anytime we fall below 80 percent we get a little bit concerned. So, right now today 20 percent of the time that station is out on another call or otherwise tied up. So, that leaves one unit on the south side of 1-84 to cover an entire half of our response district. We look at the area risk and what projects or buildings are in the area and what risks does that bring to our response and what I mean by risk is what type of calls are we going to be responding to and what's that risk factor. If you look at the south we have a southeast residential growing rapidly. We have the YMCA. We have a school. You have some high speed two lane roads. We have Meridian Road, which is another corridor that we see quite a few wrecks on. In the north we have a high school. We have large residential subdivisions. We have Highway 20-26. Some commercial development, both currently approved and -- and possibly forthcoming with medical facilities. We have high speed two lane roads again. I mentioned that in the Cherry Lane-McDermott example. Then we have also Highway 16. Part of Highway 16 and what we cover, this is part of the mutual aid process that we have. We cover everything northbound from Highway 20-26 to Highway 44. Star covers everything southbound from Highway 44 to Highway 20-26. The reason we do that is we have a large divider down the entire middle of that and so it's impossible to get to if we just cover our piece of the district. So, we split that -- that piece in two. I mentioned a little bit reliability, how reliable are the closest stations to these areas. I mentioned Station 4. It's actually at 80 percent. I apologize for the typo. We don't have enough data yet for Station 6, other than it's pretty dang reliable right now and, then, as we look at our -- our mutual aid availability -- this is also the fourth bullet point down below. In the south we really have one department that we can rely on for any mutual aid and that's Kuna. They have one station. We also have Boise Fire Station Number 14. That's over on Five Mile. If you look in the north we have a lot better mutual aid possibilities if we are out on a call. So, in other words, if Engine 35 at Linder Road is out on a call and a secondary call comes in somewhere on Highway 20-26 to the west, we typically have either Star or even Nampa come in and provide mutual aid. So, again, there is some areas where we can pretty clearly define one area over another as far as a priority when it -- when it comes to risk and the subdivisions going in, the commercial development, the school development -- again, I would argue we are still kind of a flip of the coin. That's really where we are at as far as our -- our recommendations or what we feel. With that, Council, I was hoping to leave some time for questions, discussion -- I'm sure there are some. Happy to answer. Simison: Thank you, Mark. And, Council, Mark was a little bit more forthright with me earlier when he said the station in south Meridian is the one that he would recommend moving forward if we only did one at this point in time and so I'm not going to let him off the hook with -- with leaving it as an equal component. Just that -- I think that that does bring some -- some conversations into it that people are going to want to know to that element. So, with that any questions for Chief Niemeyer at this time? Page 17 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page ——— Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: So, I remember a while back -- I don't -- I don't remember when. It's fairly recently. We saw some data where the data said that Owyhee High School -- the edge of Owyhee High School was right at five minutes. Is there -- is there some different data that -- that has transpired between then and now where Owyhee High School is now out of that five minute boundary? Niemeyer: Councilman Bernt, good question. I would have to go back to the presentation you are alluding to. The -- the most recent data set that we got is directly from our GIS team up in IT where they have -- they have run analysis based on roadway speeds and they have calculations within their system that analyze how quickly we can get to a certain point in time. Keep in mind there is variables in what you saw on the map. If we have heavy traffic congestion it's going to take us longer. If it's 2:00 a.m. where we have no road construction -- no road congestion, to Councilman Cavener's question -- or I think it was -- either that or Council Woman Strader. I apologize. At 2:00 a.m. we can probably get places a little bit quicker, because we don't have the roadway congestion. So, I think the analysis you are seeing from IT is this is based on simply roadway speeds without time of day consideration or traffic congestion consideration. Bernt: Well, one question. Do you foresee -- if we were to go ahead with two fire stations do you foresee that one would sit empty? Niemeyer: That would certainly not be my recommendation, Councilman Bernt. I believe if we are going to move forward with the fire stations -- Bernt: I know that it wouldn't be. I would be shocked if that was your recommendation. So, setting aside what your recommendation would be, is there a chance that one of these -- these fire stations would sit empty until -- until, you know, if we had some, you know, personnel issues or staffing was a problem, do you -- do you -- is there a chance that one of these fire stations would sit empty for a certain amount of time? Niemeyer: From a staffing standpoint, no. If -- if Council approves building two stations and staffing two stations, we will get two station staffed. Simison: Councilman Bernt, I think the underlying question is not knowing what will happen this year with the legislature and not knowing if Council is committed to getting the three percent for the next four years, which it would take to fund these stations potentially -- I mean the -- the -- there is a lot of changes and the money that flows in and out from various things it's really hard to predict, but I think what -- to the chief's point is what we are talking about now is not making the decision to move forward with two stations until we probably have many of those questions -- at least a couple of those questions answered. This is about whether or not -- do you think that we need two fire stations built in Meridian and, if so, having one shovel ready -- having -- doing both Page 18 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page ——— designs at the same time to save costs allows one to be shovel ready if they both don't go at the same time. It's not a throwaway cost to our -- in our belief to do this project. Bernt: Yeah. And that -- Mr. Mayor, follow up. That was -- that was my next comment slash question was with the state legislature. I have talked to Todd, you know, a couple times on and off the record about what that looks like in regard to financing both these departments --or these fire stations without, you know, hamstringing, you know, the Parks Department and the Police Department at the same time and it's sort of a -- sort of a big deal and, you know, to do this according to the -- what I have heard would require at, you know, three percent for the next unforeseeable future and, then, maybe even having to go and get foregone and so I know that we are probably safe for one year, but beyond that I agree with you, Mr. Mayor, I don't -- we just don't know what that looks like and we don't know what the state legislature is going to do in regard to property taxes. It makes it sort of uncertain and causes me for concern. Simison: Well, again, that goes back to we are not asking you to approve personnel and building of two fire stations, but the question is do you think that there is going to be two fire stations needed in the future in our community and, if so, does doing the design of both of them at this point in time, while we wait for those questions to be answered, is appropriate. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I guess maybe two questions. Just to put a little more precision around it, is Owyhee High School within the five minute response time or not is my first question. And my second question is I really want to delineate between existing development that's been approved that has not -- that is not within the five minute response time versus opening up future development, because in my mind they are two different things. Is there a way to quantify how much we have approved that's outside of the five minute response time in the southeast area of Meridian? Niemeyer: Mr. Mayor and Council Woman Strader, I can answer the first one explicitly. The answer is no. The Owyhee High School is outside the five minute travel time. As far as development goes, we can certainly bring back for discussion -- and, again, I think this goes to the Mayor's point. We are not here asking for construction of two stations at this point. This is about design of two stations. So, there is certainly more discussion to come. I think Councilman Bernt brought up a great point. We have talked about this as far as the future of funding we don't know what the legislature is going to do. We don't know some of those factors. I think I could say the same thing for growth. I could present to you today what growth is in these two areas and I could present you a year from now and it will be different in some form or fashion, depending on how we grow. So, I can certainly get that to you as Council -- a clear example of what development has been approved that's going in that we cannot hit in the five minute travel time. Page 19 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page 17—— Simison: And just to that point, that's the map that Dave Miles brought and shared from that standpoint. It's -- it is dynamic, so that's really the appropriate place to look at that. So, you can see what has been approved, that's constantly being updated with that information. But, yes, there is the area approved and there is the area already in and well outside the five minute response time. It will just be, you know, where they have a -- an entitlement to currently develop. Whether or not they have a plat or final plat or anything else, but, you know, that -- that's very true for a good portion of south Meridian. Bernt: Mr. Mayor, I remember-- I remember where I saw that data in regard to five minute response times. I believe it was in the presentation that -- that Chief of Staff Miles made where there were just overlaps of different data that we were looking at. I believe one of those -- one data set showed us response times with different fires -- you know, with seven and eight there and not there and I -- and I believe -- and I believe without the north -- the northwest fire station there the response time just right to Owyhee High School was five minutes. Simison: My recollection -- Councilman Bernt, my recollection is very close. The chief is pulling the same GIS information that's on that map. It's not different, so -- but if I -- if my recollection was very close, maybe on a portion of the property, maybe not on all of the property. Maybe not -- Bernt: I will give you that. Simison: Yeah. The school is -- the school is down a quarter mile or so off of the main arterial and I think that is -- I think you get to the property at the arterial level, but maybe not to the school in five minutes. Bongiorno: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Yes, Deputy Chief. Bongiorno: Just a quick comment. Council Member Bernt and Council Woman Strader, the school is not -- it's outside. I have the map open right now that the Mayor has been talking about and we have approved projects that touch that five minute boundary. We don't have too many that are outside of that five minute boundary. In the chief's presentation I made those slides that showed the approved projects and projects that Development has seen, but has not been submitted to the city yet and many of those are outside of that five minute response time and that's kind of what started this whole discussion was we were just getting outside of that boundary and so we were trying to find a solution to the -- to the problem. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Page 20 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page ——— Borton: Chief, does Ada County Paramedics have any stations planned near or around either region? Niemeyer: Councilman Borton, great -- great question. And we have talked about this in our Access -- as you know we are part of Access Joint Powers Agreement. They have absolutely no plans to service south Meridian or northwest Meridian. Their closest station to service that northwest corner comes from Star down closer to the -- to the city of Star and out south they don't have anywhere close to that. The closest I believe they have is coming from St. Luke's Meridian to service that area and no plans for -- I guess to make sure there is a good understanding of how we grow versus how they grow, Ada County Paramedics is primarily funded through fees for service. They have a very very small tax base. Their primary revenue source is fees for service. So, they will not put in a station into an area until there is enough call volume within that area to generate enough funds to pay for that unit. It's a little bit different animal when it comes to funding and how they fund. Borton: Interesting. Niemeyer: I can tell you south of 1-84 within ourjurisdiction Ada County Paramedics does not have any ambulances stationed south of 1-84 within the Meridian area. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: Just a few follow-up questions from what brought us to today, at least that I have -- my notes recall the -- the proposed budget we last saw in July had the Station 7 and 8 each with 600,000 dollars. It was identified as design and it sounds like there is some clarification now that it was perhaps more than just design, but that's what prompted some of the initial concern. And the way you presented today, looks like, again, there is a lot of work that's been done to get to this stage. If you have mapped out that much detail, a lot of that that you showed looks like it is a plan to do two fire stations and for what it's worth, it just kind of rolled out here a moment ago like here is how we can build them within three or four months of each other and, then, staff them within six months and so if the intent is to -- to merely design two, I guess I caught the presentation as though there was a lot of inertia to build two within a year of each other. But that -- is that not now the case? Simison: I will -- Councilman Borton, from my perspective we are still moving forward under that hope. But the funding is the reality. So, you know, we are preparing these and the chief would bring forward potential construction in FY-22 for both these if the funding is there at that point in time and if Council agrees. So, on one hand this is about, you know, designing and getting both of them ready and what will -- what will the legislature do and will the funding mechanisms be there. Will we have the leverage to do both? We don't know that. Page 21 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page 19 of— Borton: So, Mr. Mayor, I guess that's the concern that -- that I had was is the design is somewhat the camel's nose under the tent and though it's not a technical commitment to do two, if we see in next year's budget, for example, you know, one or two stations, those would go into a proposed budget in lieu of something else and there is -- those are big conversations. The adjustment in the CFP to allow that to occur in a compressed fashion, while approving just the design, is maybe not a commitment, it sure does push it down the road towards that and that's what, frankly, gave me some concern, because that's a huge pivot financially to do the construction and the staffing of two stations in a compressed time frame. You know, one of the design questions that -- from today's presentation that kind of jumps out is why not use the design of Station 6 for Station 7. Niemeyer: Council Member Borton, I can -- I'm happy to answer that one. That is the design that we are using as the template. There is certainly some things we learned from the build of Station 6, some minor modifications. We anticipate a slightly smaller footprint in square footage. That's just redesigning some walls and moving some walls. But that is the template that we are using to start that project. Borton: So, just a couple of follow-ups if I could. Just trying to get my head around how -- I guess I don't get the savings. I don't understand how engineers and architects work, how they--they actually save it and if, for example, you didn't use Station 6 as a template, if a single station as presented today designed is roughly 425,000 dollars to do a single station, I assume that's the cost using the Station 6 template. If we didn't use the template do we know what the figure is designing a single station from scratch and if we learned things from Station 6 that we want to do different in seven, might we also benefit from doing -- designing seven and learning more and improving it again for eight? I mean there is -- those are some of the unknowns that I think gave a little pause and do it quick. Niemeyer: Yeah. I think there is -- there is a lot of questions there certainly. What's the cost of doing a standalone station without a template? I have no idea. I'm not an architect and I would have to engage that architect firm or any firm to get a better understanding of that. I think there is -- as I have learned there is a bunch of different pieces when you talk about architectural design and the cost of it; right? So, there is schematic design and there is further design and there is construction docs and all of that that I'm sure Public Works and Parks are very used to. We are not. So, I don't know the answer to your question on that as far as template versus non-template and cost differentiation. As far as learning things, I will give you the best example I can. We started developing a spec for fire engines a number of years ago. I think when you were on Council before and certainly Councilman Hoaglun was there. We started building that spec and we got to a point where we were super happy with that spec and so now when we order a fire engine there is no more sit down and draw out what we think we need, we just call Pierce and we say rinse and repeat what we have done, because we are very happy with it. I think overall we are incredibly happy with Station 6. We know that the footprint is going to be a little bit smaller in these next two stations. We don't need that much room because we don't anticipate multiple units potentially in the future out of that. So, there are some -- some tweaks that need to be made and certainly there is costs associated with those tweaks. As far as continuing to hone in the perfection of a fire station, I'm -- I'm pretty Page 22 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page 20—— happy with what we have. We did a really good job designing Station 6 and the layout, the safety features of Station 6, so I don't see a whole lot of changing and tweaking with regards to the next few stations. I think the --the school district has been a good example of finding a design they like and, then, being able to replicate that at other sites and they save money by doing so. Borton: Okay. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: So, in my mind I'm sort of going through each step. So, acquiring the land for fire stations that -- that seems like an easy decision. That's not getting any cheaper; right? So, we need to get the land. I think it's for one of these fire stations. That makes sense to me. So, we need to make that move sooner. It sounds like the need is higher in south Meridian to me for the risk analysis, but I'm a little bit questioning the cost savings of co-designing them. I think I have some similar concerns that Councilman Borton has. I think if I felt there was a true significant cost savings I would be all for it. I just -- it's not making a ton of sense to me yet, but I'm open to hearing more. It seems to make sense to get more dialed in. I would like to get a little more dialed in maybe in a separate conversation with Dave Miles,just about how much development have we approved that's outside of the five minutes. If it's a significant amount it feels like we are going to need one in south Meridian sooner rather than later. But I do think Council can control how we grow and that we have to hold ourselves to those priority areas, so we don't get stuck building a ton of things at one time and stretching ourselves too far. Cavener: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Mayor. Yeah. Just giving this some -- some thought and listening to Council Members speak and weigh in on this, it's definitely something that we know in the future we are going to need two -- two locations, one in the north, one in the south for fire stations. I think going through purchasing the land, getting everything prepped, going through the design phase, puts us in a position and to a point where, then, we can make future decisions based on the information that we have and we will be well positioned to decide do we go forward with both, do we go forward with one, which one is that, and that's information that we don't have now, but going through these three steps that the chief outlined on that one slide I think puts us -- there is some cost savings and to Council Woman Strader's point, you know, how much is that exactly. I don't know what her significant is versus my significant amount of savings and that sort of thing, but it would get us to the point where we are ready to go. It strikes me a little bit like some of the land purchases we do for parks. We try to look ahead. We try to make those purchases in advance. It's cheaper in the long run and we are well positioned, then, to decide, hey, let's start that phase one or whatever phase we want to proceed with in a park and you try to do it far enough in advance and I see that in the same light. We are doing this far enough in advance, we have got the land at Discovery Park, we have got an agreement Page 23 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page 21 —24 with a developer who is giving us a very good deal for land and, then, if we do the design we are ready to go and we will see what happens with the legislature, with tax revenue, where the growth might occur more quickly in one area over the other and, then, we can decide one or two and move forward with that. So, to me it makes sense to go to that point and, then, okay, what's next. And we can make that decision when the time comes. Simison: And just as a reminder, Council, we are talking one hundred percent impact fees. So, this is what these funds are there for. They are not in competition with something else that we can or can't do from that standpoint. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: I agree with Councilman Hoaglun. I see the advantage of designing these at the same time and continuing with what we have already committed for FY-21. If -- if we don't design them at the same time -- I mean I -- this is one of those elements of -- this isn't just about the cost of-- of design and staffing needs, but it's also how we are planning to grow and just like we are having these conversations about the school district, if we have a development come before us and we know that a new station is slated to come on in 2023, then, that helps us in our planning decisions for -- you know, for residential developments. If we don't design both and we just design one and say it's in south Meridian, then, what happens in north Meridian is still sort of out there in an undetermined time frame and I think we will have some difficulty with our planning decisions in the future come two, three years from now. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I think my thought process is more on the lines of Mr. Borton. I -- I understand -- and I don't think there is anyone that's going to say that we don't need two fire stations. think it's pretty evident that we need ultimately new -- two fire stations. But the problem is funding both at the same time and I'm just going to be real frank and I'm going to just say it. I mean Station 6 was an absolute cluster and -- and -- and I'm not going to point any fingers and I'm not -- I'm not going to, you know, get into a -- you know, a discussion of why that was the case, but knowing that that's the case, I just -- with the -- with the lack of funding or the lack of direction from the state legislature and what that looks like, makes me pause knowing that I have some big questions in regard to how we are going to staff and how we are going to be able to afford both stations makes me pause and there is just too many question marks in my opinion and if we -- if we do a rinse and repeat type situation where we -- we design one fire station and do the exact same fire station in another area, I don't see the real imminent need to design two at the same time, knowing that both are going to be smaller and -- but, you know, fairly similar in design. So, I feel like if we approve two designs and -- if we approve the design for two fire stations, I feel like that's where we are headed. I feel like there is going to be momentum going that Page 24 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page 22—— direction that will be difficult to stop and -- and if I -- and personally if -- if -- if those questions aren't answered for me, then -- then I would rather take pause, do one, and, then, reevaluate next year after we know what the state legislature has decided. So, with that said I'm in favor of one. I think the data shows it's to the south and that's -- that's -- those are my thoughts. Simison: Council, we are not making a decision tonight. This is part -- in your budget discussion where you would be making any modifications to the budget at that point in time. Strader: Mr. Mayor, two quick questions. Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I was just curious if we designed one, what the architect or design team feedback would be on the turnaround time to, then, go and design a second one. How long does it take? Does that set us back a long time or is that something that -- because we are using an existing design we could be pretty flexible and nimble on that. Then I guess my other question would just be is there -- in your experience if a certain amount of time goes by before a station is built, does it become like outdated? I guess that's kind of a question to ask, I mean how close to the construction ideally should you design it? Niemeyer: Council Woman Strader, great questions. I will answer both and the first -- the first question I will make no commitment whatsoever on the nimbleness and quickness of design. I'm not going to do that. I can tell you the process is about a six to nine to 12 month process, take your pick. So, if we are truly talking about designing one and, then, waiting to design another, no promises. I think as far as the outdatedness of a design, certainly over time there are code changes that would change the requirements of whatever and I think the Public Works folks and the Planning folks could speak much better to some of those code changes that could occur that might change the size of a two by six or a two by four or two by eight or the headers or whatever those changes could be. I think from the standpoint of a layout, once we have the design it could be one year, two years, three years. I think once we are happy with a design and a layout and a floor plan, we are good on our side. It's just a matter of code changes. So, from a design perspective that timeline I'm not even going to take a guess at how long it would take to complete that first step, that first station, and move into a second one. I just want to throw out -- and certainly for discussion in the budget hearing. From my standpoint as the chief that manages our impact fee fund, along with Todd Lavoie, I have a real challenge trying to step over a potential savings of 135,000 dollars and if that means we need to bring more documentation and data before you to do that, I'm okay with that. But as I look at how do we fund our needs moving forward, that's -- that to me and I think Councilman Hoaglun alluded to it, what's -- what's big to each of us, that's -- that's certainly a perspective. For me trying to manage our impact fee fund, 135,000 dollars is no small change and if we can save that potentially through a joint design, I think that's the right move and that's what I will certainly bring back to the budget hearing and more data along with that. Page 25 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page 23 of— Simison: And, chief,just as a refresher, I think we get really confused on maybe -- maybe not -- on the word design. This -- this is a development process that -- that this goes through in a lot of different aspects. So, it's not -- it's not the -- drawing the picture as the sole purpose through this process, because, otherwise, you are right, we already have a design. We can just be done. But that's not the way these things are funded or paid for and they generally work off the overall cost of the project. You know, unfortunately, you don't get -- you don't get a lot of cost savings by just pulling up -- up the last plan and putting it onto a piece of -- on the property. So, just keep that in mind. It's not about drawing the building. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Just -- because that is -- I need some help with that, to be honest. So, I think what would be helpful for me to understand is -- is the savings associated with an architect and other professionals managing a process of construction that's happening at the same time or where that savings really comes from, because if we are not going to build them at the same time -- if we may not build them at the same time, the probability of whether or not we do that is a big driver of whether those cost savings are realized. So, I think if I just had more information that -- for our budget hearing about where the savings comes from, that would help -- that might help me, because, yeah, I don't know exactly what's included in that, you know, quote, unquote design. Niemeyer: Council Woman Strader, Members of Council, we can certainly provide that in a packet to you by tomorrow. We have the data that shows where those savings are in the -- in the various aspects. To the Mayor's point, design consists of multiple factors and so that -- we asked the architect to break that out into several different factors that incorporate design and so we can certainly send that packet off and have that further discussion. Simison: Council, any further questions on this item? Borton: Thank you, chief. Simison: Thanks, chief. Niemeyer: Thank you. Bernt: Thanks, buddy. EXECUTIVE SESSION 20. Per Idaho Code 74-206A(1)(a) To deliberate on a labor contract offer or to formulate a counteroffer. Page 26 Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. August 11,2020 Page——— Simison: Mr. Nary, are we going to go into Item 20 at this point in time? Nary: Mr. Mayor, it's not necessary this week. We could skip the Executive Session. The short time frame and the longer regular meeting, I think we are good for a week and we will reschedule for next week. Simison: Okay. Then, Council, do I have a motion to adjourn? Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Member Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I move that we adjourn our work session. Perreault: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to adjourn the work session. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Those opposed nay. The ayes have it and we are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:45 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 8 / 25 / 2020 MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK Page 27 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of July 28, 2020 Work Session Meridian City Council Work Session Item#1. July 28,2020 Page 20—20 Simison: Council, do I have a motion? Bernt: Mr. Mayor, I move that we come out of Executive Session. Hoaglun: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and second to come out of Executive Session. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I move that we adjourn the meeting. Hoaglun: Second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second to adjourn the meeting. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:08 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 08 / 11 / 2020 MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of July 28, 2020 City Council Regular Meeting Meridian City Council Item#2. July 28,2020 Page 81 of 81 (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 08 / 11 /2020 MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Order for Allmon Subdivision (H-2020-0071) by Dean Waite, Todd Campbell Construction, Inc., Located at 5875 and 5885 N. Locust Grove Rd. BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: JULY 28, 2020 ORDER APPROVAL DATE: AUGUST 11, 2020 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT ) CONSISTING OF 33 BUILDING ) CASE NO. H-2020-0071 LOTS AND 4 COMMON LOTS ON ) 9.91 ACRES OF LAND IN THE R-8 ) ORDER OF CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT FOR ALLMON ) APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION. ) BY: TODD CAMPBELL ) CONSTRUCTION, INC. ) APPLICANT ) This matter coming before the City Council on July 28, 2020 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of"PLAT SHOWING ALLMON SUBDIVISION, BEING 5875 AND 5885 NORTH LOCUST GROVE ROAD, SITUATE IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR ALLMON SUBDIVISION—FP H-2020-0071 MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2020, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 1/3/2020,by JOSEPH D. CANNING, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 4," is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated July 28, 2020, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked"Exhibit A" and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Dean Waite, Todd Campbell Construction, Inc., a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked "Exhibit B" and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR ALLMON SUBDIVISION—FP H-2020-0071 issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight(28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 1 lth day of August , 2020. By: Robert E. Simison Mayor, City of Meridian Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon the Applicant,Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 8-11-2020 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR ALLMON SUBDIVISION-FP H-2020-0071 EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT E � 1 ��, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 7/28/2020 Legend DATE: ff Project Lacfl-fior TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: H-2020-0071 EH Allmon Subdivision LOCATION: 5885 & 5875 N. Locust Grove Rd. (Parcel#S0530142200 &#S0530142050; ZZ NE 1/4 of Section 30,TAN.,R.IE.) � a 00 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat consisting of 33 buildable lots and 4 common lots on 9.91 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Dean Waite,Todd Campbell Construction, Inc. —PO Box 140298,Boise, ID 83714 B. Owner: TBC Land Holding—PO Box 140298,Boise,ID 83714 C. Representative: Same as Applicant III. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat(H-2019-0135)in accord with the requirements listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. In order for the proposed final plat to be deemed in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-3C.2,the number of buildable lots cannot increase and the amount of common area cannot decrease. Staff has reviewed the proposed plat and the number of Page 1 Item#3. buildable lots and common open space is the same; therefore, Staff deems the proposed final plat to be in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. IV. DECISION Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions noted in Section VI of this report. V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(dated: 4/30/2020) E M IJ di tITP — _ — Pop OF ,— i7J'Al.-_ 14,11111 Ar K = : I -sue -=•r= - .. �'r— —"i ..� Y_ ..j - - � Item#3. B. Final Plat(dated: 6/30/20) Al"on Subdivision MWT � � 3 R r� } i rD � +T {� n MAW ROOL T 9 A A Lr.-!3 rsl lR[. ` Allmon Subdivision t ...,may z. kT & .,.... �_,..,..,_, FQ- � { 112) l� As ME '--�' ■#J5 lrPln■�rs�Inc- rw_ti..r.yw rw_ Page 3 Item#3. C. Landscape Plan(dated: 07/20/2020) & Site Amenity Details id c m -- �� III • � i � I � I � � I } tl I - raw.... W�....- .- r - I � I L_________________________-___�--__-__________________IRV t{,: ��rrrx +er.L.-r ' r➢YYLJ 1 II �� II ;--s c:I- F, I '� _______________ I� L� r IyCs3G ILIL'i � "� FCG RXdI"CS Rif — "' I IL.pyi tft ar ml-IKI _ 7P6-.JP ' 2 Item#3. LM r 1 1 J ❑ CE to I I ' T.jr t• r s IH i J 4 I •:.4::4:.::4 L_______________________________1______ ___J _________________ W5 e _ TI{E.4747A1Y.Fi I.�IFa F I r7 i.'m[ • �w�•�b.�e CLu ms n¢[ixy wcwvpa npm FLAW a r w+- � J I.�GI'a Gk.Y-+.na'Or+e.e , 2 2 xxxx I. .'f1 �LI. ,1 ' =11 J.. I I r 11 ,,.f' 1 I J I i LU -- p k�yo.)pt�.�sop,y ll'14 t•II�,��.nw -______________________ __ - SETS CKMXJF%G TABLE LAND USE CANCULAnON9 CySR{G 7RCC+W FKC-MArpH PLM 4 Page 5 Item#3. r---------------------------------------------------------------�.. CL 15 mix I I I I I I , -- -I I T nw T 17 I I L-_ _____ _ _-----_--_-_-_-----__-----_-------------------_--_--__-_I r---------------------------------------------------------7 w I =-nsr r rcrcT. •:•.w,u � yowm:sv lu rvcfii� FH Eh LA I — - - p f 6 4 3 I � E,ilk- _ d W T I Ear11anStren 9 � ' r I— I y 1 I I I I I 'I � ' I i - I I 1 F appw4 rRw 1 ra 5 M I'CR3147W S I +rb'rc-�r-_u ire � 1 - I-------------------------------------------------------- Item#3. r------------------------------------------------------------ r•'.ilk+rr�'f hewiii-:,xrll ptC t� I yv mu f'ICr'. '_— -- — -- — I 1 •' I I �Ih � — Q 176 11 � 20. L 1.''. .'.-. .'. .'. I J `. . . I ! OIL 4f1 _ I n : I aZ L1 12 13 Id j . III r l- i---------,....P}.".'------------------ — ------------------------•- ---- �. % A OL Fju&9w6 "MR.— f��`r�F!h�r�ltr: l��m¢n.xanruc:•+xrr.�l-rt. �811i'�a-ryR'Inr°otr-"`— � - Page 7 Item#3. Playground Tidewater Club --,M Equipment $12r512.aa r -1 Weeets National Standardsfor: r ASTM F1487-17 r CPSC Guidelines#325 Product Description Product Specifications Look what the tide swept In...an afternoon of fun!With our 7ldewater Club structure,chl Wen will wade Into a world adventure.Composed of two different Price:$12,512.' eleMalxd platforms connected bya setotstacs,th.sactivltypacked play structure Model Number'PKP007P feati,res clltnhers,ladders,two slides,and creative accessories.Children will have a blast zipping down our unique,enclosed Tube Stlde or racing one another down Age Range:5-12 years the Double Sfide.Klds can access the 36�inch platform via Vertical and Overhead Child Capacity-.2$-32 !.adders or trice the stairs for more ImmediateC Ca access.Once they've cJlmbed up P ty= the stairs,Children will find the slide deck,which Is also accessible vla Pad Fall Height:$4" dlroher.Then,on tine ground Iewel,a Store Panel,Bongos,and a Shlp's Wheel all facllltate dramatic and cmabve play,bringing children together,and rnaking the Past Diameter:3.5 inch tidewater Club play structure ADA compliant.A cIwIr Pyramid Roaf covers one of Product Type:Ouiek Ship the platforms,providing rellef from the weather on sunny days-Compact and full of physical development challenges and educatlonal accessories,the Tldewater Safety Zone:32'W x 30'5" dub proves again and again that rt is no a.. s r ADA Compliant 6. Elevated 5 components Cround Level 4 components •vow NVB Playgrounds,lnC.DBA PiaygroundLquipment.com 800.667.0097 PLAYGROUNUEQUIPMENT.COM Item#3. D. Common Driveway Exhibit LLlN SUBDIVISION LOTS 12-14, BLOCK 1 o as COMMON DRIVEWAY CONFIGURATION SCALE ,-INCH=3C�FEET NQRTH ALE: 1-1NQH = 34-FEET 1V ti IP.7 34'ti }rJ.L54} .U47' IBLOCK 1 l � s» _—WE 0I k til � I + - cl- I 1 5 fJBg'4 E. '?1LV 93's --- f wCD LD I _µ L 1 'Y r'2� 20' C. pm R0.50' ft h �' R•� } 11 s; t4 rwSir .5` Page 9 Item#3. VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the approved annexation(Development Agreement-Inst. #2020-070271) and preliminary plat(H-2019-0135)applications approved for this site. 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the subject final plat within two years of the City Council's approval of the preliminary plat(by May 12,2022); or apply for a time extension, in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by B &A Engineers,Inc., stamped by Joseph D. Canning, dated: 6/30/2020,included in Section V.B shall be revised as follows: a. Note#11: "Lots shall not be reduced in size without prior approval from the health authority and the City of Meridian." b. Note#15: "Lots 1,N16 and 3421,Block 1, and Lots 1 and 612,Block 2 are common lots . . c. Note#16: The lot numbers noted as servient to and containing the ACHD storm water drainage system are incorrect;revise accordingly and graphically depict easements on the face of the plat. d. Note#17: "Direct lot or-access to North Locust Grove Road is prohibited unless specifically approved by ACHD and the City of Meridian." e. Widen Lot 12,Block 2 to a minimum of 25 feet to allow for a 5-foot wide landscaped buffer on the east side of the lot between the common driveway and the fence in accord with UDC 11-6C-3D.5. A copy of the revised plat shall be submitted for City Engineer signature. 5. The landscape plan prepared by Idaho Precision Landscape., dated 07/20/2020,included in Section V.C, shall be revised as follows: a. Depict a 5-foot wide landscaped buffer on the east side of the common driveway to separate the paved surface of the driveway from the fence in accord with UDC 11-6C-3D.5. b. Include the grass symbol in all landscape areas or vegetative groundcover as set forth in UDC 11-313-5N(i.e. parkways along internal local streets, along Locust Grove Rd., etc.). c. If the unimproved street right of way is ten feet(10')or greater from the edge of pavement (along Locust Grove Rd.)to edge of sidewalk or property line,the developer shall maintain a ten foot(10') compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of the transportation authority and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.5.a.Landscape improvements within the right-of-way require a license agreement between the property owner and the transportation authority. d. Depict trees along the pathways(micro-path and multi-use pathway) in Lot 16,Block 1 per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C; and include the linear feet of the pathways and the required and proposed number of trees in the Landscape Calculations Table. Item#3. e. Depict the eastern property boundary of the subdivision,the future curb location along N. Locust Grove Rd., and a landscape strip between the curb and detached 10-foot wide pathway/sidewalk. 6. A perpetual ingress/egress easement is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder for the common driveway,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. A copy of the recorded easement should be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer; or shall be depicted on the face of the plat. 7. Construction of the common driveway shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D and with the exhibit in Section V.D. 8. Provide address signage at the entrance to the common driveway at the public street for homes accessed by the common driveway for emergency wayfinding purposes; and sign the common driveway with a"No Parking—Fire Lane"sign as set forth in IFC D 103.6 Signs. 9. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer,the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster, Sue Prescott,at 887-1620 for more information. 10. All fencing shall comply with the standards in UDC 11-3A-7. 11. Future development shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district. 12. Off-street parking shall be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family detached dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 13. Future development of Lots 11 and 13-15,Block 2 shall be consistent with the common driveway exhibit in Section V.D. 14. Single-family homes on Lots 14 and 15,Block 2 shall be restricted to 25 feet in height. 15. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions: 1. The street light plan submitted with the construction plans appear to meet city requirements based on a preliminary review. 2. Separation between storm drainage infiltration trench and sewer mainline needs to be 10',per the scale on the drawings this requirement isn't met. 3. It is the City's desire to eliminate/minimize the number of sewer services going through storm drainage infiltration trenches. Where possible,locate services outside of trenches. General Conditions: 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department,and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. Page 11 Item#3. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life,safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff,the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life,non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district Item#3. or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2" x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non- domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 9-1-28.C.1).The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available,a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 4. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Page 13 EXHIBIT B From: Dean Waite <pm.tccinc@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 12:47 PM To: Sonya Allen Cc: Adrienne Weatherly; Charlene Way; Chris Johnson; Bill Parsons Subject: Re: Allmon Subdivision - FP H-2020-0071 Staff Report for City Council on July 28th F.xteirin6l Seiindeur- Please use caution with links or attachments. We are in agreement with this report.Thank you. Best Regards, Dean Waite Todd Campbell Construction Inc 208-631-5052 On Mon,Jul 20,2020 at 11:45 AM Sonya Allen<salien@meridiancity.org>wrote: Attached is the staff report for the proposed final plat for Allmon Subdivision.This item is scheduled to be on the City Council consent agenda on July 28t".The meeting will be held at City Hall, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, beginning at 6:00 pm. Please call or e-mail with any questions. Dean—If you are not in agreement with the provisions in the staff report, submit a written response to the staff report to the City Clerk's office (cityclerk@meridiancity.org) and me by 3:00 pm the Thursday prior to the meeting and the item will be placed on the regular agenda. If received after that time,the application will be placed on the regular agenda on the next available Council meeting. Thanks, Sonya Allen I Associate Planner City of Meridian I Community Development Dept. 33 E. Broadway Ave., Ste. 102, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-884-5533 1 Fax: 208-489-0578 Built forUBusiness, Designed for Living o IIIOiilpiii� ' 111 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Order for Hill's Century Farm North (H-2020-0077) by Kody Daffer, Brighton Development, Inc., Generally Located on the East Side of S. Eagle Rd. and South of E.Amity Rd. BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: JULY 28, 2020 ORDER APPROVAL DATE: AUGUST 11, 2020 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT ) CONSISTING OF 134 BUILDING ) CASE NO. H-2020-0077 LOTS AND 18 COMMON LOTS ON ) 29.77 ACRES OF LAND IN THE R-8 ) ORDER OF CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT FOR HILL'S ) APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT CENTURY FARM NORTH ) SUBDIVISION NO. 2 ) BY: BRIGHTON DEVELOPMENT ) APPLICANT ) This matter coming before the City Council on July 28, 2020 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of"PLAT SHOWING HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH SUBDIVISION NO. 2, LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE NORTH '/2 OF THE NORTHWEST '/4 OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2020, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH NO. 2—FP H-2020-0077 HANDWRITTEN DATE: MAY 13, 2020,by AARON L. BALLARD, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 8," is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated July 28, 2020, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked "Exhibit A" and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH NO. 2—FP H-2020-0077 Item#4. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian,pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight(28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 1 lth day of August , 2020. By: Robert E. Simison Mayor, City of Meridian Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon the Applicant,Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 8-11-2020 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH NO. 2—FP H-2020-0077 EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 7/28/2020 Legend :. DATE: U I 15Project Lacfli�or ®®e TO: Mayor&City Council Ru R IN R= FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner R-8 RUT 208-884-5533 a R- -C RUT SUBJECT: H-2020-0077 T _ RUT Hill's Century Farm North No. 2 RUT - LOCATION: East side of S. Eagle Rd., south of E. - Amity Rd., in the NW'/4 of Section 33, Township 3N.,Range 1 E. EM RUT -15 RUT RUT I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat consisting of 134 buildable lots and 18 common lots on 29.77 acres of land in the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Kody Daffer, Brighton Development—2929 W.Navigator Rd.,Meridian, ID 83642 B. Owner: Same as Applicant C. Representative: Kody Daffer,Brighton Development, Inc. —2929 W. Navigator Dr., Ste. 400, Meridian, ID 83642 III. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat(H-2019-0134)in accord with the requirements listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. In order for the proposed final plat to be deemed in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-3C.2,the number of buildable lots cannot increase and the amount of common area cannot decrease. Staff has reviewed the proposed plat and the number of buildable lots and common open space in this phase are the same as depicted on the approved Page 1 Item#4. preliminary plat;therefore, Staff deems the proposed final plat to be in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. IV. DECISION Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions noted in Section VI of this report. V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(dated: 11/18/2019) H I LL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH PRELIMINARY PLAT I► r�tra► APARC'g43ELANOSITUATEaIN THE HW3�4OF Etc -FIOM33,7€IWM3HIP4MORSII,hANGE] FIST.00tPF PUPIIPM.QTY DE MERMNAP4 A!M MUH IY,IUAHQ i- ;•�r�lir� s��•-tea 634 * y ,-.---------t-_�_..-L�.. �,.. ' :--=-- II --' -.ram a.aW+�� 10 I sac a URIOL M 6 -} +h E $ $ 6o-ltle a r*0 a a q ¢ : 5 • . J I �_ �_-� ii° 9i, �� ___c I y aalarvrve� v 9ap- R'r,17X 7Ql,MLM 1kU*Wh--N k"jG R 'IT I CY Eff Item#4. B. Final Plat(dated: 5/13/20) rr.,,T OF ■ �w� Hm2S CENTURY FARM F14R111 SUQDNI510N k6 2 M -r, orra �w ra�rn■,ra � I I. $ T rx a e ea$e' +�eis �� sb r w #, 10 u. 9 dole 9 f#z-r,= w w I ' I I' - --T---- i� e= !:U. N}GNN�I P4FATUJH KAT# MILL'sumrn m'Fmm MMTm SUBMISKE fYa Z f f 3 + 1w t0 $ -sp -FI to a e g S 4 hm A1116h11p1 L�IIP'OHAT-mm wni Page 3 Item#4. FLAT HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH SUBDIVISION No.2 IMLiFrInL II y 11?�� rwLL, *q HED i W.00+0v IkhYl� k Ez I� j 0 1 t aso PpkwrL� - � +i his ,i�•vµ, hpl L ' �� 72134 axvi• t— BRIGHTpM OaRPCdI/.TiON PINY OF HILLS CEHIIJFY FARM NQfiTH SL19dIV1510M No.2 8 ds 6--W FYI + wiA t '"- I` _ W.Sr�nrwR _fwri�T.q n _- 1 — 18�ja S 8111i-iHTi7N{f]RP�fLP.Tli7ry Item#4. PLAT OF IiIWS CENTURY FARM NORTH SUBDWIS9DN No.2 _ ID lip ; . p y r ��i I LL_ L_ F_-J L-____J •'• .0. i- ••T,r,na-„ c+ 107a 7e B�GFffCPN ppgFppfilY� HIWS CENTURY FARM NORTH&UDDIViSION 8c.2 chi;r� ,-�~..'4— r Ic � X. iYw7 Ta •7CS.'� Z7 L' '�81S�d'4S�STLIbB:�� 1 lBY6Mm C000mT" Page 5 Item#4. C. Landscape Plan(dated: 05/12/2020) I v:<r rrs L,.b.laorlen4aul mi; 10 2, @—' i ' ��r�• ar�ta�•' art -'— `':�_ ..,...—..��— x' +" •„ —_ _i ilk '+'] -4-/ � y�r-ram i tiad� ■ PEM EEL Ih IMM - 1 Item#4. 11 jI IIir I — Ir T k,"�i' Ft87kTIM5 AIL n7 _. __ t • _ j ,..ter Y —_ —T • , a_ a LAHTIMG 4ETAIL N9 •,•, y�y 1al an _ 1: /+}PLANTING 6ETAIL N4 , `L a l• Page 7 Item#4. D. Common Driveway Exhibit I:H',L'Aa+ 15 HLWG 1 -11 EE 5F 4'FMR�s �OC1f4EF ow,r1E ran mE&M �E p wi,x.u.IG.via wmruexC D Oi PppgA oLN rp 4A1100[AFIML OM � &uw IliMJ.,ha IA7 Sq.6 X � pa v LrE WIN AU L-A L Ldr ncRMMA rrrda 1 I y [A:EWNr w Fx"u 12 I 96 ,7e.Ohg W z I I .1INLRO Ea29 � a T ---- -- SM w 9ThIGf 4 I DPE + F Y'dW L !� u Q Peery MR rp611-A 1 } I r J LrlrOEMf RA r4 EE UXMTM rT I I I r Ir E I I W f wL W r r�la t Fx'i+r I M 1114ElOG+,f4 od,iG n%®! WW 1 I1 ,I rrgOEr EEPFG9cE 9EE PRUMM PME 31 I r 6 10 I 8F THE i14AFL ON9aEAiY uYC — 1 QY%K I P119JC I'M LAsuou I r Y W CHLp .E LN a I � I IIIMLDWC L _j LJrmv[h ' + ItL I.or,:o. . I Lai �8 `ice 1 I$�[sa WF ,Af 19 9 O JJ M E[.9Oh10 r N a 1 N r#4 h N r, h�N FW-KrA.'Jku "ai'P1P h 16P ANC 7 dl 1FC �iQ L"'PscIPr1G AND O��Ik�S. OF 7W ix 171 • I�1A FJO411Ch11 N '�++OP Or IXrY4i0h 9M4k Iww� w,rc xeA L5,' V"6 Id ELGC.I F'FSrERT+'ur¢ BL l r LOT11G-20, ILOCK 1 ry W. U, r rnlr 1-•�n' =lrr srAH � 1 '��i .tiEr'rW4 f `} T f* r k Item#4. E. Residential Setbacks for Cadence Approved with the Planned Unit Development(H-2019-0134) y t, 1 - woN cm C� e �t- fir. r — .— . .-. .. ..- PARK W. - a mi _ __ ! F7CtR31k#3 RFAIf1FHi- � x Q '3A';POCf4i5�4NS� - '� eo Haw f ffrTypm FH MfS aARROO 1 t ATRUT SKM RCAIE ,I -Rd-OMM&L 4AErPAFIK84M v� r-W {-W ed Q# AT fA7o.+iao.a�.w.ee , W- r fV ,s-V CENTURY FARM arum v�-rxa�r cr.hn� gV4T A $R lew 7R4 frACAM-arms .�.wsrr�,v:rvs��.v1a.av nw Page 9 Item#4. F. Conceptual Building Elevations Approved with the Planned Unit Development(H-2019-0134) TYPICAL PATIO HOME ELEVATION !�I TYPICAL ALLEY HOME ELEVATION VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the approved annexation(Development Agreement-Inst. 42015-061375, Ist Addendum#2016-119080,2'Addendum#2019-033207 and 3'Addendum 42020-059662) and preliminary plat(H-2019-0134)applications approved for this site. 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the subject final plat within two years of the City Engineer's signature on the previous phase final plat; or apply for a time extension, in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by KM Engineering, stamped by Aaron L. Ballard, dated: 5/13/2020, included in Section V.B shall be revised as follows: a. Note#1: "Minimum building setback lines shall conform to the that approved with the planned unit development(H-2019-0134)or the-appheable zoning regulations of the City of Meridian at the time of issuance of a building permit, as applicable." b. Note#9: Correct the typo on the width of the easement. c. Note#11: Include the recorded instrument number of the City of Meridian sewer and water easement. d. Note#19: Include the recorded instrument number of the ACHD landscape license agreement easement. e. Note#24: Include the recorded instrument number of the ACHD public right-of-way easement. Item#4. f. References—R4.: Include the Book and Page numbers of the recorded plat for phase 1. A copy of the revised plat shall be submitted with the final plat for City Engineer signature. 5. The landscape plan prepared by Alyssa Yensen,KM Engineering, dated 05/12/2020, included in Section V.C, shall be revised as follows: a. If the unimproved street right of way is ten feet(10') or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line,the developer shall maintain a ten foot(10')compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of the transportation authority and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.5a. A copy of the revised plan shall be submitted with the final plat for City Engineer signature. 6. The rear or sides of homes on lots that face S. Eagle Road(i.e. Lots 42-47,48-53, and 55,Block 1) shall incorporate articulation through changes in materials, color,modulation, and architectural elements(horizontal and vertical)to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines. 7. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer,the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster, Sue Prescott, at 887-1620 for more information. 8. Building permits for the community center on Lot 101,Block 1 are allowed to be issued prior to subdivision of the property as allowed in the Development Agreement. 9. The Applicant or Owner shall have one year(until April 28,2021)to complete the tasks listed in UDC 11-3F-3B for final approval of the private streets proposed within the development. No building permit shall be issued for any structure using a private street for access to a public street until the private street has been approved,with the exception that a building permit may be issued for the community center. 10. The Applicant shall coordinate with Terri Ricks,Land Development, and Joe Bongiorno, Fire Dept., for addressing lots accessed by alleys without frontage on a street. 11. All fencing shall comply with the standards of UDC 11-3A-7C. 12. A perpetual ingress/egress easement for the common driveway(s)is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment.A copy of the easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat; or,the easement may be depicted on the face of the plat. 13. Address signage shall be provided at the ends of the common driveways on Lots 19 and 54, Block 1; and for lots accessed by alleys that don't have frontage on a private street for emergency wayfinding purposes. 14. All common driveways shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D; homes on lots accessed via common driveways shall comply with the setbacks shown on the exhibit in Section V.E. 15. All alleys shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3B.5 with an allowance for the entire length to be visible from a private street rather than a public street. 16. Parking is restricted to one side of the 29-foot wide streets and shall be provided on the street side adjacent to the alley accessed units rather than the patio homes with front accessed garages to allow for more spaces that aren't encumbered by driveways. Page 11 Item#4. 17. A minimum of 80 square feet of private,usable open space shall be provided for each dwelling unit in the R-15 zoned gated portion of the development(i.e. Cadence); this requirement can be satisfied through porches,patios, decks and enclosed yards as set forth in UDC 11-7-413. 18. Development of the R-15 zoned gated portion of the development(i.e. Cadence) shall be consistent with the Residential Setbacks exhibit in Section V.E and the conceptual building elevations included in Section V.F. 19. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat, planned unit development and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions: 1. The street light plan submitted with this application appears to meet requirements based on a preliminary review. Streetlights on Eagle Road may require a future installation agreement because the road is scheduled to be widened in 2023.If streetlights are installed on Eagle Road,the locations must be approved by ACHD. 2. The slope between sanitary sewer manholes SSMH #6 and SSMH #7 and SSMH #9 and SSMH #10 is too steep. Please revise to be 5%or less. 3. Since sanitary sewer clean-out#21will be removed,the slope of pipe coming into SSMH#22 needs to match existing slope coming from SSMH#20(0.44%). General Conditions: 4. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 5. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 6. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer,an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 7. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-313-14A. 8. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 9. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Item#4. Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 10. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 11. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements,prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy,a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 12. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 13. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 14. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 15. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 16. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 17. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 18. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 19. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans.This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 20. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 21. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 22. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility,or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather Page 13 Item#4. dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x I F map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed,and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 23. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 24. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at(208)888- 5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 25. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 26. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 9-1-28.C.1).The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 27. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Delano Subdivision (H-2019- 0027) by Boll Cook Investments, LLC, Located at 14120 W. Jasmine Ln. and 2800 E.Jasmine Ln. Item#5. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW #... AND DECISION& ORDER , In the Matter of the Request for Annexation of 15.22 Acres of Land with R-8(3.31 Acres),R-15 (8.12 Acres) and R-40(3.79 Acres)Zoning Districts; and Preliminary Plat Consisting of Sixty Six (66)Buildable Lots for Single-Family Detached Homes,One(1)Buildable Lot for a Multi-Family Development,Eight(8) Common Lots and Two(2) Other Lots on 15.22 Acres of Land in the R-8, R-15 and R-40 Zoning Districts for Delano Subdivision,by Boll Cook Investments,LLC. Case No(s).H-2019-0027 For the City Council Hearing Date of: July 28,2020 (Findings on August 11,2020) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019, Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR DELANO SUBDIVISION—AZ,PP H-2019-0027 - 1 - 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for annexation&zoning and preliminary plat is hereby approved with the requirement of a Development Agreement per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-6B-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-613-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 11- 6B-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR DELANO SUBDIVISION-AZ,PP H-2019-0027 -2- A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR DELANO SUBDIVISION-AZ,PP H-2019-0027 -3- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the I Ith day of August 2020. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED AYE COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED AYE MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 8-11-2020 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR DELANO SUBDIVISION-AZ,PP H-2019-0027 -4- Item#5. EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT �� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT H HEARING July 28,2020 Legend DATE: TO: Mayor&City Council _ FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 _ I Bruce Freckleton,Development r Services Manager 208-887-2211 ly SUBJECT: H-2019-0027 Delano Subdivision maim - - LOCATION: 2800& 14120 W. Jasmine Ln. - "T.. History: This project was originally heard by the Commission on May 2, and July 18, 2019; at the hearing on July 18`h, the Commission voted to recommend denial of the project to City Council. The City Council heard the project on November 12, 2019; at that hearing, Council voted to remand the project back to the Commission to address the density issue of the proposed development and for Commission's review of a revisedplat with changes to lots proposed along the northern boundary of the subdivision that front on E. Della Street(e.g. single-story, detached units, lose a lot(s)). (See pg. 16 for more information) Update: The Applicant submitted revised plans for the Commission hearing based on discussion at the City Council hearing and meetings with the neighbors, included in Section VIT The revisions include a reduction in the number of buildable lots from 85 to 66; a change to the proposed zoning(the portion of the site along the north &west boundaries previously proposed to be zoned R-15 is now proposed to be zoned R-8); and a change to the conceptual building elevations. Staff has updated the subject staff report based on the revised plans—original text that is no longer applicable is shown in strike-out and new text is shown in underline format. The conditions of approval in Section VIII are not in strike-out/underline format as there were no conditions that went forward to Council because the Commission recommended denial of the project; new conditions are included in accord with the revised plans based on those originally recommended by Staff to the Commission for the May 2, 2019 hearing. A summary of the Commission hearing on April 16, 2020 is included on page 18. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION designation;impaet a-ad planaing aFea in Mer-idia-a's planning aFea with a Nfi�ied Use Regional Fulidfe Land Use Map Note: The Comprehensive Plan Map amendment application is no longer needed as Page 1 Item#5. the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) was amended with the new Comprehenisve Plan to include an MU-R FL UM designation for this property. Annexation&zoning of 15.22 acres of land with R-8 (3.31 acres),R-15 (11.57 8.12 acres)and R-40 (3-.64 3.79 acres)zoning districts; and, Preliminary plat consisting of 85 66 single-family residential building lots, 1 building lot for a 96-unit multi-family development,and 12 88 common lots and 2 other(common driveway lots on 15.22 acres of land in the R-8,R-15 and R-40 zoning districts. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT 1. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 15.22 Future Land Use Designation MDR(Medium Density Residential)i City of Mer-i r & Mixed Use-Regional(MU-R)4a C4V of B &e Existing Land Use 2 existing homes&accessory structures Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family residential(SFR),attached p• deta hed and conceptual multi-family residential(MFR) Current Zoning RUT in Ada County Proposed Zoning R-8,R-15 &R-40 Lots(#and type;bldg/common) 85 66 SFR building/128 common/1 MFR building and 2 other Phasing plan(#of phases) Yes;23 phases Number of Residential Units(type 444 66 SFR detached units"4 ,,ttaehe 67 deta he SF ,and of units) 96 MFR apartments) Density(gross&net) 7-.35 5_7(SFR,R-8&R-15)&27(MFR,R-40)gross units/acre; 11.8(SFR,v 15) u,27(MFR,n nm o«8.12 units/acre(SFR)(net) Open Space(acres,total[%]/ See Analysis, Section V.3 buffer/qualified) Amenities Shade s«...,,.ture (2)play structures,benches podestr „ walk-ways See Analysis, Section V.3 Physical Features(waterways, None hazards,flood plain,hillside) Neighborhood meeting date;#of February 25,2019;92 attendees attendees: Applicant met with the Alpine Pointe HOA Board on December 16'and 231,2019;the revised plan was presented to the HOA Board on February 18',2020-30+/-people attended(an official neighborhood meeting was not held as it wasn't required). History(previous approvals) None Page 2 Item#5. 2. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report No Yes (yes/no) • Requires ACHD Yes(tentatively sehe „'oa., ,.,heard on May 22,2019) Commission This project is being heard by the ACHD Commission because of Action(yes/no) objections from neighbors pertaining to the extension of Dashwood Pl. and connectivity to Centre ointe Way Fire Service • Distance to Fire 1.34 miles from Fire Station#3 (can meet the response time requirements) Station • Fire Response 3 minutes under ideal conditions Time • Resource 82%from Fire Station#3—does meet the target goal of 9580%or Reliability greater • Risk 21 (SFRre4dentia4)and 4(MFR)—current resources would not be Identification adequate to supply service to the proposed project;(see comments in Section VIII.Q • Accessibility Meets requirements;FD is eaneemed as there is ne visitor par-king in the development r-estilting in people par-king in ai-7eas that may bleek aeeess to esi es. See additional comments in Section VIII.C. • Special/resource Doesn't The MFR portion of the project will require an aerial device(see needs comments in Section VIII.C) • Water Supply Requires 1,000 gallons per minute for 1 hour(may be less if building is sprinklered) • Other Resources NA Police Service • Distance to 5 miles Police Station • Police Response 4:30 minutes Time • Calls for Service 0904 in RD `M724' • Accessibility PD has no issues with proposed access • Specialty/resourc No additional resources are needed;MPD already services this area. e needs • Crimes 0119 • Crashes 026 West Ada School District • Distance(elem, Discovery Elementary—2.83 miles;Heritage Middle School—3.4-6 miles; ms,hs) Rocky Mountain High School—5-56_2 miles • Capacity of Discovery Elementary 650;Heritage Middle School 1,000;Rocky Schools Mountain High School 1,800 • #of Students Discovery Elementary�5511;Heritage Middle School 1-,2-541, 446;Rocky Enrolled Mountain High School'z,44a2, 669 • Anticipated 68 schoolaged children generated by this development Page 3 Item#5. Wastewater • Distance to 0-feet _ Sewer Services • Sewer Shed Five Mile Trunkshed • Estimated 181 Project Sewer ERU's • WRRF 13.66 MGD Declining Balance • Project Yes Consistent with WW Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts& The following proposed manholes have less than 3'of cover:A-3,A-4,A- Concerns 5,C-1 and D-5.Public Works has previously discussed with the applicant the possibility of using grinder pumps in these shallow areas,but the plans do not note the use of them.If the parcel to the north of the multi-family is to be served by Meridian,applicant must stub sewer at minimum slope in N.Centre ointc Way to the north boundary line. Water • Distance to 0-feet Water Services • Pressure Zone 3 • Estimated See application information Project Water ERU's • Water Quality None • Project Yes Consistent with Water Master Plan • Impacts& Public Works has met with SUEZ Water and agreed that water service to Concerns the north for the multi-family portion of the development will be provided according to how annexation proceeds. Meridian will provide water in Meridian,and SUEZ will provide water in Boise. Page 4 W11111191,111 NAVIT--..Jj IAIU,RON . 1 , ION nnllI -, ■ION! - k. .. on iu '�.IIIRII=1 a NININ �.J � •� ■O,OI.� i1N1111:.■IINIINIIN Anil I.- :0111111::OI111111111 �RIRRR R�Rr NI II■I l�,IIIIGf� � uu unuuwlq�m �•�''_�, 'y -� II.BOO■ � --2;��::.� Y'•+ � R + Y.. - --III■-■■ 9N11111111111 7F ...{{{•••111 • IN - ■ �; ON ONE No _ u ■ IIII oil MINIM INS! -i iiiiii- �lilll lll�� _� � —_ �� Y •�� _ J .n u„ law_ iuuNor Ell all ill.l�iy i ilil'ii• 2.i r -..�+e+�.7T�L R. � —III iii'ii111,=■' ':�i� ��• VIP anon! -� ■ • � ION Nil Yii t� • L1 k',.,■ INC �F ■ ay+ w �'+ - 111�1 i i Il ■ r Sinn!+i EJNINI„ iLll„N, I ulul 4� L uull-..Nun.! !; uuI- uuu S -� uuli iN],N„N,N olio• :.uuu- •-� # .N1111111 W IP N 41 1 d Y 1, ■ �iA !lull-�3_�—�_ a • r.�,;" ''+�ilSl Pius' 11 "ill�i• fij 17 - ...P—M- Ilu=!■ � II+,III:- .+n ' ki Lr O ■e in � .lUba� I• { - •�,nn IN �IN LU IF- ■ ■_ . • .. a �_ Item#5. B. Owner: Norm Cook— 14120 W. Jasmine Ln.,Boise,ID 83713 Eddy Bollinger—2800 E.Jasmine Ln.,Meridian, ID 83646 C. Representative: men Bailey,Devoe Developmentl 1=C; 4824 E. Favie��e., Boise, 1P 83 Hethe Clark, Clark Wardle—251 E. Front St.,Boise,ID 83701 IV. NOTICING Planning&Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date 4/12/2019; 6/28/2019; 8/2/2019; 8/30/2019; Newspaper Notification 2/25/2020; 3/27/2020 4/24/2020 Radius notification mailed to 4/9/2019; 6/25/2019; 7/30/2019; 8/27/2019; properties within 300 feet 2/25/2020; 3/27/2020 4/21/2020 Public hearing notice sign posted 4/22/2019; 7/8/2019; 3/4/20; 9/6/2019; 11/01/2019; on site 4/4/20 4/29/2020 Nextdoor posting 4/9/2019; 6/25/2019; 7/30/2019; 8/27/2019; 2/25/2020; 3/27/2020 4/22/2020 V. STAFF ANALYSIS 1. f''l1T,PREiiE Since the hearing at City Council on November 12, 2019, the City adopted a new Comprehensive Plan, which included an amendment to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM that assigned an MU- R designation to the majority of the property that lies east of Centrepointee Way. Therefore, the application for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is no longer required; Staffhas deleted this section from the report. 2. ANNEXATION&ZONING The applicant requests annexation and zoning of the 11.5 7 11.43 acres west of N. Centrepointe Way with an the R-8 (3.31 acres) and R-15 (11.57 8.12 acres)zoning districts; and the 5 acres east of N. Centrepointe Way with an R-40 zoning district(3-.64 3.79 acres)consistent with the MDR and proposed MU-R FLUM designations.Note: There is a small portion of the Cook parcel(east side of Centrepointe Wax) that on the FL UM does not have a designation. This was a mapping error and the entire Cook parcel is effectively designated MU-R. Comprehensive Plan(https://www.meridiancity.or /�compplan): The Future Land Use Map(FLUM)designation for the portion of this site west of the extension of N. Centrepointe Way is Medium Density Residential(MDR)it the City f Mar-id ;the portion of the site east of the extension of N. Centrepointe Way is eufFent4y was previously located in the City of Boise's Area of City Impactboundary and iswas designated General Mixed Page 6 Item#5. Use. On October 29,2019,the Boise City Council approved and adopted the resolution(RES- 521-19)to amend the land use map of Blueprint Boise to transfer this area from the City of Boise Area of City Impact(AOCI)to the City of Meridian AOCI. The recent amendment to the City of Meridian's FLUM included this property with a Mixed-RegionalMU-R)future land use designation.As noted in the previous eeti n the n....i:eant proposes t amend the F UM designation. The MDR designation allows smaller lots for residential purposes within City limits. Uses may include single-family homes at gross densities of 3 to 8 units per acre. The MU-R designation allows high density multi-family developments as supporting uses for higher intense commercial uses such as those to the south and east of this site along a major transportation corridor(i.e. Eagle Rd./SH-55)and near arterial intersections (i.e. McMillan/Eagle Rds. &Ustick/Eagle Rds.). Land Use: The proposed land use for this site is single-family residential (SFR)and a future multi-family residential(MFR)development(i.e. apartments). A total of 5566 (19 attae e a-E 67 detached) SFR units at a gross density of 7-465_7 units per acre, and a net density of 44-8 8.12 units per acre are proposed; and 96 apartment units are planned to develop in the future at a gross and net density of 27 units per acre. The proposed density is consistent with that desired in the MDR and MU-R designations respectively. Proposed Use Analysis: The proposed single-family dwellings(a**a�detached)are listed as a principal permitted use in the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts; and the multi-family development is listed as a conditional use in the R-40 zoning district per UDC Table 11-2A-2. Multi-family developments are subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27; compliance with these standards will be evaluated in the future through the conditional use permit process. Concept Plan: The Applicant submitted a concept development plan for the property to the north(Parcel# R4582530100) at Staff s request to demonstrate how the property could possibly redevelop with the extension of N. Centrepointe Way to the north as planned on the MSM(see Section VII.E). Transportation: The Master Street Map(MSM) depicts a planned north/south commercial collector street through this site from the south boundary to the north boundary eventually connecting to E. Wainwright Dr. for access via N. Eagle Rd./SH-55. The portion of Centrepointe W4Y proposed to be constructed with this development is consistent with the MSM. Comprehensive Plan Policies(https:llwww.meridiancity.or /g compplan): Goals,Objectives, &Action Items: Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this application and apply to the proposed use of this property(staff analysis in italics): • "Provide for a wide diversity of housing types(single-family, modular,mobile homes and multi-family arrangements)and choices between ownership and rental dwelling units for all income groups in a variety of locations suitable for residential development." (3.07.03B) A mix of SFR a;*��detached homes and MFR apartment units are proposed within this development which will provide ownership and rental options for various income groups in this area. Page 7 Item#5. • "Provide housing options close to employment and shopping centers."(3.07.02D) The proposed development will provide housing options in close proximity to the employment and shopping center uses along the Eagle Rd. corridor. • "Locate high-density development,where possible,near open space corridors or other permanent major open space and park facilities,Old Town, and near major access thoroughfares."(3.07.02L) The density proposed in the multi family portion of the development falls within the high density category. The site is located wiMin approximate lX a mile of rom Kleiner Memorial Park, a 60-acre City Park, and is in close proximity to N. Eagle Rd./SH-55, a major access thoroughfare. • "Consider ACHD's Master Street Map(MSM)in all land use decisions."(3.03.04K) The MSM depicts a north/south collector street through this site; the proposed plan depicts a collector street in accord with the MSM. • "Require open space areas within all development."(6.01.O1A) Qualified open space in accord with the minimum standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3 is required. • "Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is contiguous to the City."(3.01.01F) The proposed development is contiguous to the City and urban services can be provided to this development. • "Restrict private curb cuts and access points on collectors and arterial streets."(3.06.02D) One(1) access is proposed on the west side off. Centrepointe Way, a collector street, to the SFR portion of the development; and one (1) access is proposed on the east side off. Centrepointe Way for the MFR portion of the development. Staff recommends local street access (or a driveway with a cross-access easement) is provided to the property (#R4582530202) abutting the R-40 zoned portion of the site as set forth in UDC 11-3A-3A.3, as the property currently only has access via Eagle Rd./SH--55. • "Coordinate with transportation agencies to ensure provision of services and transit development." (6.02.02H) This site is not currently served by public transportation. However, ValleyConnect 2.0 proposes bus service on Eagle Rd.from the Boise Research Center to downtown Kuna with 20 minute frequencies in the peak hour. The Closest bus stop would be less than %mile from this site when that route is operational. • "Require pedestrian access connectors in all new development to link subdivisions together to promote neighborhood connectivity as part of a community pathway system."(3.03.03B) There are no pathway connections to this development from adjacent developments to the north and south other than sidewalks adjacent to public streets. Staff recommends the Applicant coordinate with the Developer of the property to the south (Brickyard Apartments)to incorporate pedestrian connections between the two developments i.e. the single-family and the mulit-family developments) on each side of N. Centrepointe Way. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in all Mixed Use areas,per the Comprehensive Plan (pgs.23-24): (Staffs analysis in italics) • "Residential densities should be a minimum of six dwellings/acre." The gross density of the proposed MFR development is 27 units per acre which falls within the range desired in mixed use designated areas. Page 8 Item#5. • "Where feasible,higher density and/or multi-family residential development will be encouraged, especially for projects with the potential to serve as employment destination centers and when the project is adjacent to US 20/26, SH-55, SH-16 or SH-69." The proposed development incorporates a MFR component along with the SFR development and is in close proximity (i.e. 460) to N. Eagle Rd./SH--55. The proposed development will provide housing options for nearby employment centers. • "A conceptual site plan for the entire mixed-use area should be included in the application." A concept plan was included on the landscape plan for the future MFR development in conjunction with the SFR development currently proposed. • "In developments where multiple commercial and/or office buildings are proposed(not residential),the buildings should be arranged to create some form of common,usable area, such as a plaza or green space." This development does not include commercial/office buildings. • "The site plan should depict a transitional use and/or landscaped buffering between commercial and existing low-or medium-density residential development." The proposed single-family armed an detached units with var;ying lot sizes and setbacks will provide a transition in density and lot sizes between larger single-family residential lots to the north and the townhomes/multi family lots to the south. This development does not include any commercial uses; however, the proposed multi family development on the eastern portion of the site will provide a transition between the proposed single-family attached and detached units and future commercial/mixed uses along Eagle Rd. • "A mixed-use project should include at least three types of land uses [i.e. commercial (includes retail,restaurants, etc.), office,residential, civic (includes public open space,parks, entertainment venues, etc.), and industrial]. Exceptions may be granted for smaller sites on a case-by-case basis." The proposed development plan only includes one land use type (i.e. residential); however, lrreetwo different types of residential units are proposed(i.e. single-family detached, nand multi family apartment units). Within the overall mixed use designated area, which incorporates land on both sides of Eagle Rd./SH55 to the south to Fairview Ave., there are a mix of uses as desired consisting of commercial(retail, restaurants, etc), office and residential uses. • "Community-serving facilities such as hospitals,churches, schools,parks, daycares, civic buildings, or public safety facilities are expected in larger mixed-use developments." This is a relatively small portion of the overall mixed use designated area; none of these types of uses are proposed on this site nor have they been developed on the adjacent mixed use designated area to the south. • "Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks,plazas, outdoor gathering areas,open space, libraries,and schools are expected; outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count." The proposed plan does not incorporate public and/or quasi public spaces and places; the common area proposed in the residential development is owned by the Homeowner's Association and does not satisfy this requirement. These types of public spaces have been provided in the adjacent mixed use designated area to the south. • "All mixed-use projects should be directly accessible to neighborhoods within the section by both vehicles and pedestrians." Page 9 Item#5. The proposed development plan shows interconnectivity with the residential neighborhood to the north providing accessibility to the commercial development to the south via N. Centrepointe Way. • "Street sections consistent with the Ada County Highway District Master Street Map are required within the Unified Development Code." The proposed development plan includes a north/south collector street(i.e. N. Centrepointe Way) consistent with the Master Street Map. • "Because of the existing small lots within Old Town, development is not subject to the Mixed-Use standards listed herein." The proposed development is not within Old Town; therefore, this provision is not applicable. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in MU-R areas,per the Comprehensive Plan(pg.30): • "Development should comply with the general guidelines for development in all Mixed-Use areas." See analysis above. • "Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 10%of the development area at densities ranging from 6 to 40 units/acre." The proposed residential uses comprise 100%of the site. Densities of the SFR and MFR developments are in accord with this guideline. • "Retail commercial uses should comprise a maximum of 50%of the development area." No retail commercial uses are proposed with this development; however, the MU-R designated land to the south incorporates a large amount of retail commercial uses. • "There is neither a minimum nor a maximum imposed on non-retail commercial uses such as office, clean industry, or entertainment uses." No commercial uses are proposed with this development. Zoning: Based on the analysis above, Staff is of the opinion the requested annexation with the R-8,R-15 and R-40 zoning districts and proposed development is generally consistent with the MDR and prepesed-MU-R FLUM designations and is appropriate for this site. The proposed annexation area is contiguous to City annexed property to the north and south;the R-8 and R-15 area is within the Area of City Impact Boundary(AOCI)and the R-40 area is outside of the AOCI boundary. A legal description for the annexation area is included in Section VII.A. The City may require a development agreement(DA)in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. In order to ensure the site develops as proposed with this application, staff recommends a DA as a provision of annexation with the provisions included in Section VIII. 3. PRELIMINARY PLAT Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There are two(2)existing homes and accessory structures on this site. These structures are required to be removed prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer for the phase in which they are located. Page 10 Item#5. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The proposed plat and subsequent development is required to comply with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-6 for the R-8, 11-2A-7 for the R-15 and 11- 2A-8 for the R-40 zoning districts (so ). The proposed plat complies with these standards. Subdivision Design&Improvement Standards(UDC 11-6C-3): The proposed subdivision is required to be designed and improved per the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3 which include but are not limited to streets,driveways,common driveways, easements,and block face. The proposed plan complies with these standards. Phasing Plan: The subdivision is proposed to develop in 23 phases as shown on the phasing plan in Section VIILC. The first phase will include the extension of N. Dashwood Pl. from the north through the site to N. Centrepointe Way. Staff recommends the phasing plan is revised to include construction of the street buffer on the east side of N. Centrepointe Way in the first phase so that the street buffer and detached sidewalk is constructed and the buffer landscaped with the first phase of development. Access(UDC 11-3A-3,11-3H- /Streets: Jasmine Lane, a 50-foot wide private street,currently provides access to the lots in Jasmine Acres Subdivision,including the subject properties.The private street is depicted on the Jasmine Acres subdivision plat. Staff is unaware if a separate recorded easement exists for the private street.Where the easement crosses the subject property it should be relinquished; proof of relinquishment shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat. One access is proposed on either side of N. Centrepointe Way, a collector street; and an emergency only/pedestrian access is proposed from the extension of N. Dashwood Pl. at the north boundary of the site.A stub street(E. Jasmine St.)is proposed to the parcel to the west for access and future extension. Public streets are proposed within the SFR portion of the development with 27-foot wide street sections; private drive aisles will be provided within the MFR portion of the development. In accord with UDC 11-3A-3,which limits access points to collector streets to improve safety and requires access to be taken from a local street if available,Staff recommends N.Dashwood Pl.is extended as a full access street into the site with the first phase of development.Note:ACHD approved the connection of Dashwood Ave. to the existing stub street to the north (Dashwood Pl.) as a temporary emergency access/pedestrian connection until Centrepointe Way is extended to Wainwright Dr., or within 10 years, whichever occurs first. When Centrepointe Way is extended to Wainwright Dr., Dashwood Pl. will be reconstructed as a public street for vehicular connectivitv to Wainwri hg t Dr. UDC 11-3A-3A.3 requires all subdivisions to provide local street access to any use that currently takes direct access from an arterial or collector street.The parcel to the east of the property proposed to be zoned R-40 on the east side of Centrepointe Way(Parcel #R4582530202),currently takes direct access via N.Eagle Rd./SH-69, an arterial street and a State Highway; therefore, Staff recommends local street access(or a driveway with a cross-access easement)is provided to the property to the east as set forth in UDC 11-3A- 3A.3. The Applicant should coordinate with the developer of that property on a location for the access street/driveway. Staff recommends N. Centrepointe Way is extended/constructed with the first phase of development from the southern to the northern boundary of the site so that if re- development of the property to the north Won occurs before the multi-family portion of Page 11 Item#5. this site,the connection to Wainwright Dr. can be made and services can be extended-as -H • Traffic: A Traffic Impact Study was not required by ACHD for the proposed development; however,the Applicant did include an informal traffic analysis in their application narrative based on ACHD's Policy Manual that takes into consideration existing traffic volumes in relation to anticipated traffic volumes from the proposed development and the resulting impacts to Wainwright Dr. &Dashwood Pl. The analysis shows the total trips per day on Wainwright at 41%of total capacity; and on Dashwood at 44% of total capacity resulting in 56-59%under total capacity for these streets,which should not overburden existing roadways systems if these calculations are correct. See application narrative for more information. Many letters of testimony have been received from adjacent residential property owners to the north regarding the amount of traffic that will be generated from the proposed development and routed through their neighborhood.For this reason,it's imperative that the Centrepointe Way connection to Wainwright occur as soon as possible; thus,the reason for Staffs recommendation for the pr-opeFty to the north to be ineluded in the amendm to the Fr UM and for the construction of Centrepointe to the northern boundary of the annexation area to occur with the first phase of development. Common Driveways (UDC 11-6C-3 All common driveways are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. TlweeTwo(32)common driveways are proposed that comply with UDC standards. Common driveways should be a maximum of 150' in length or less,unless otherwise approved by the Fire Dept. An exhibit is required to be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks,fencing,building envelope and orientation of the lots and structures.Driveways for abutting properties that aren't taking access from the common driveway(s) should be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line away from the common driveway. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited unless separated by a minimum 5-foot wide landscaped buffer. A perpetual ingress/egress easement for the common driveway(s)is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment.A copy of the easement should be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat. Signage should be provided at the ends of the common driveways on Lot 435,Block l et 7,� and Lot-19,Block 34 for emergency wayfinding purposes as requested by the Fire Department. Transition: There are 68 single-story structures with 10 8 dwelling„rits4,-epe(ties proposed along the west boundary of this site adjacent to the 8.2 acre rural residential property to the west, which is currently in Ada County and designated as MDR(3-8 units/acre) on the FLUM. There are-5-.5 6 existing single-story residential properties to the north that abut this site that are 0.31-0.38 of an acre in size;4-012 single-family structures 15 12 a.,.o'�:r.„fits/ .,.,....el4ies are proposed along the north boundary of the site. n a4ive of the appliea4iea tha4 demeastmtes the proposed struettifes and lots in relation to existing home shops pafk4ng areas ra • ards. See aerial map below. Because the homes proposed along the north and west boundaries will all be a single-story in height, Staff believes they will have a lesser impact on adjacent neighbors than 2-story homes would have; therefore, Staff is not recommending a greater transition in lot sizes Page 12 Item#5. isthan proposed.However,the Commission and City Council should consider any public testimony provided in determining if fewer lots/structures should be provided along these boundaries as a better transition to existing residential properties. IP wri #: 1 1 41 N L. Parking(UDC 11-3C): 33 Parking for single-family dwellings is required based on the number of bedrooms per unit. For 1- bedroom units, a minimum of 2 spaces per unit are required with at least one of those spaces in an enclosed garage, other space may be enclosed or a minimum 10' x 20' parking pad. For 2-3 bedroom units, a minimum of 4 spaces per unit are required with at least 2 of those spaces in an enclosed garage, other spaces may be enclosed or a minimum 10' x 20' parking pads. Because of the proposed reduced 27-foot wide street sections,parking is restricted to one side of the street only resulting in fewer available on-street parking spaces for guests and households with cars that can't be parked on private property than is typical with a full street section which allows parking on both sides of the street. Off-street parkin is s required to be provided on each lot in accord with the aforementioned UDC standards. Beeause of the w lots ( detaehed homes a-ad asseeia4ed dfiveways,there is not ade"a4e feem for-on street pafk4ag in ftent of these lots for-guest pafk4ag a-ad in some afeas par-king is a ways away. Wher-e at4aeh heraes are proposed,there is r-eefn for-appr-eximately one spaee per-every 2 lots for-On Stfee On-street parking(6658 spaces)is also available adjacent to common lots and along one side of the street within 200' f e any home• ,ithi, the deve ,.... e-at.(see Exhibit H in Section VII). Pathways(UDC 11-3A-8): Pathways are required to be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8 with landscaping on either side of the pathway(s)in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B- 12C. Page 13 Item#5. Beeause inter-eonneetivity is important and espeeially so in mixed use developments, Staff reeommends the Applicant coordinate with the Developer of the property to the south (Brickyard Apartments)to iHeffper-ate pedestrian eonneetions between the developments on eaeh side of N. Centr-epointe Way-. Sidewalks(UDC I1-3A-17): Sidewalks are required to be constructed adjacent to public streets as set forth in UDC 11-3A-17. Minimum 5-foot wide detached sidewalks are required along all collector and a4er-ial streets; and minimum 5-foot wide attached(or detached) sidewalks are required along local streets as proposed. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-17): Parkways are required to be constructed and landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3A- 17E. Eight-foot wide parkways are proposed along the collector streets and along internal local street abutting common areas in accord with UDC standards. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): Per UDC Tables 11-2A-7 and 11-2A-8, a 20-foot wide buffer is required adjacent to N. Centrepointe Way, a collector street. Street buffer landscaping is required to be provided within common lots in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C; trees and shrubs should be depicted within the street buffers on either side of N. Centrepointee Way in accord with these standards. The Landscape Calculations table should include the linear feet of street buffers and the required vs.proposed number of trees demonstrating compliance with the aforementioned standard. Landscapin is s required to be provided in common open space areas in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-G-3E;the proposed landscaping exceeds the minimum standards. Landscaping is required within parkways as set forth in UDC 11-3A-17E and 11-3B-7C; the Landscape Calculations table should include the linear feet of parkways and the required vs.proposed number of trees demonstrating compliance with the aforementioned standard. Qualified Open Space(UDC 11-3G): Based on the overall development area which consists of 15.21 acres of land, a minimum of 10% (1.52 acres)qualified open space is required to be provided within the development per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B. Because the site is bisected by a collector street and the portion of the site proposed to develop with apartments is not beingdped at this time, Staff recommends the 10%open space is provided on each property; the R-8 and R-15 propertX totaling 11.3+/-acres should provide a minimum of 1.13 acres and the R-40 property totaling 3.6+/-acres should provide a minimum of 0.36 of an acre(in addition to the open space required in UDC 11-4-3-27C for multi-family developments). A revised qualified open space exhibit was submitted as shown in Section VII.F that depicts 4431.23 acres(or 44—.510.8%)of open space for the SFR portion of the development consisting of a 10.69 of an acre park with amenities,parkways, , and linear open space that is at least 20' wide and has an access at each end and is landscaped, and a collector street buffer and a lees' street buffer. The linear open space on Lot 17,Block 4 doesn't qualify as it's not accessible at the west end as required by UDC 11-3G-3B.1e,however the rest of the area meets the minimum standard at 1.17 acres. stFeeVland use buffer-along the southem bettada-r-y of the site toward the qualified open spa ents(see Seel o n below f more inf ion) The open space on the R-40 property will be evaluated for compliance with UDC 11-3G-3B at the time of submittal of a conditional use permit. Page 14 Item#5. are that does not qualify(i.e. the perimeter-' — I g1he east boundary)and is below the The"alified open spaee Em the N4FR pot4ion of the site east side of GefAfepoipAe Way ifielud develop 4 this time and is eeneeptttal in flattir-e and likely to eha-age, Staff r-eeefmneads a DA required of the total land area(i.e. 5 acres). Because that portion of the site is not planned to qualified open spaee is provided a4 the time of development that m-e-eets the standards in UDC 11 3G 3B. This reqttiremen4 is in addition to th ieqir-e�' i rc�xr vDG 1 1 4-3 27C�vr-NIF-Rueye efAs-. Qualified Site Amenities (UDC 11-3G): A minimum of one(1)qualified site amenity is required to be provided for this development based on the size of the overall development(i.e. 15.21 acres). The Applicant proposes a shade structure, children's play structure, children's climbing dome, children's climbing boulders, seating benches,public art and a pathway as amenities,which exceed UDC standards. The pathway does not count as a qualified amenity as it doesn't meet the standards in UDC 11-3G-3C.3; however,the other amenities proposed do qualify and exceed the minimum standards. Existing Trees: There are many existing trees on this site the Applicant states are being removed by the residential property owner for firewood. Include mitigation information on the plan for any existing trees that are not removed by the property owner in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-10C.5. Waterways(UDC 11-3A-6): The Nourse Lateral runs along the northern boundary of this site and is piped. An easement should be depicted on the plat for the waterway.If the easement is 10 feet or greater,it should be located within a common lot that is a minimum 20-feet wide and outside of a fenced area unless modified by City Council as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6D. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing constructed on the site is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A- 7. The existing fencing along the north and southwest boundaries of the site is proposed to remain. A 6-foot tall solid vinyl privacy fence is proposed along the west, south and east boundaries of the SFR portion of the site as well as along the nofth, oast and south boundaries of the MF p^.tion of th ^ t^ in accord with UDC standards. A 4-foot tall wrought iron fence is proposed around the perimeter of the children's play area on Lot 1,Block-32. Utilities (UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is proposed. Street lighting is required to be installed in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. See Section VIII.B below for Public Works comments/conditions. Pressurized Irrigation System(UDC 11-3A-IS): An underground pressurized irrigation system is required to be provided for each lot within the development. Page 15 Item#5. Storm Drainage(UDC 11-3A-18 : An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed single-family a**a�. detached units and multi-family apartment structures as shown in Section VII.F. Building materials for the single-family homes consist of a mix of siding(horizontal and vertical lap siding and board&batten) and stucco with stone veneer accents. The multi-family structures are required to comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual; single-family detached structures are exempt from this requirement. All SFR homes along the west and north perimeter boundaries of the development will be restricted to a single-story in height as proposed b, t�pplicant. Because the rear and/or side of 2-story structures on Lots 14-1812-8,Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 25 that face N. Centrepointe Way will be highly visible, Staff recommends those elevations incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses,step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches, balconies,material types,or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines.Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. Public Testimony:Many letters of testimony have been received on the original plan submitted with this application,primarily from residential neighbors to the north in Alpine Pointe Subdivision(aka Zebulon Heights). The primary concerns are the intensity of the development (i.e. density is too high); not enough transition in lot sizes to lower larger lots to the north; extension of N. Dashwood Pl. and Centrepointe Way and resulting traffic generated from this development and from the developments to the south that will be routed through their subdivision until Centrepointe can be extended to the north to Wainwright in a more direct fashion; and safety concerns for children pertaining to traffic. The neighbors have suggested several alternate development plans that would result in less traffic through their neighborhood. See public testimony in the project file for more information. Additional public testimony has been received on the revised plan that can be accessed at: https://weblink.meridianciby.org/WebLink/browse.aspx?id=166928&&dbid=0&&repo=Meridian C 4. A T TTDAT A TT;1T C-OmFi i A NC-E A local street buffer is no longer proposed;Staff has removed this section as it is no longer applicable. spaee for-the development. The"alified open spaee peFtaining to street bugar-s listed in UPC= 11 36 3B allOws the full are 5B 5,to be allowed to eeui4 the area of a leeal stT-eet buffer-toward the miniMUM EtUalified Opffi of the SFR peAien of the site with dense!andseapiag along E. jasmine ., a leeal street, to btfff-eF Page 16 Item#5. alter-native provides an equal or superior-means of meeting the ipAent and purpose of the regulation(see Findings in Seetion IX.D)-. inteaded pur-pose of UDC-11 3G-3 has been met. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed!''l,.v...rehe..siye Plan",rap Amendment ment if- the p eel to the nei4h(R4592530100) is also ineloded,the Annexation&Zoning and Preliminary Plat applications with the conditions included in Section VIII.A per the Findings in Section IX. if the par-eel to the aeAh(R4592530100) is not ineltided in the map amendment, Staff recommends denial of annexation and zoning reqaest for the eastern par-eel(i.e. R 4 0 zone). B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on May 2 and July 18, 2019. At the public hearingon n July 18t'',the Commission moved to recommend denial of the subject CPAM, AZ and PP requests to City Council. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing: a. In favor: Jim Conger; b. In opposition: Malissa Bernard(representing many neighbors on Dashwood Place to the north in Alpoint Point Sub.);Frank Marcos(Alpine Point Sub. HOA President); Kenneth Clifford; Sherry Garey; Greg Walker;Patricia Pitzer; Joy Cameron; Sandi King; Laura Trairatnobhas c. Commenting?: Connie Thompson; d. Written testimony: Many(47+/-)letters of testimony were received(see public record). e. Staff presenting application: Bill Parsons f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Ke. ids)of public testimony a. Consensus that proposed density of development is too high; b. Not enough transition in lot sizes is proposed to larger lots to the north; c. Concern pertaining to the extension of Dashwood Pl. and Centrepointe Way and resulting traffic generated from the proposed development and from the commercial and multi-family residential developments to the south that will be routed through the subdivision to the north if Jasmine is connected to Centrepointe before Centrepointe can be extended to the north to Wainwright; d. Safety concerns for children pertaining to traffic; e. The proposed development is premature and that infrastructure (i.e. the extension of Centrepointe to Wainwright) should be in place prior to the development goingin,n,not after the fact; f. There has been no negotiation with neighbors by the Developer as directed by the Commission; 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. The desire for the City of Boise to take action on a request to exclude the eastern portion of the site from their Area of City Impact boundga prior to the City making a decision on this application; b. The possibili , of only an emergency access via Dashwood Pl.; Page 17 Item#5. C. Concern pertainingtquacy of parking for the development; d. Preference for R-8 vs. R-15 zoning for the single-family portion and R-15 vs. R-40 zoning for the multi-family portion of the site as a transition to adjacent zoning; e. Density should be reduced due to Heritage Middle School and Rock Mountain High School already being over capacity f. Desire for the Applicant to work with neighbors to address issues that were brought up at the hearing. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. The Commission recommended denial of the proposed CPAM,AZ and PP applications to the City Council based on their desire for the Applicant to obtain approval from the City of Boise for the adjustment to the Area of City Impact boundary; and opinion the applicant did not sufficiently work with the neighbors on their concerns pertaining to the proposed development. 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. None C. City Council: The City Council heard this project on November 12,2019 and moved to remand the project back to the Commission to address the density issue of the proposed development and for their review of a revised site plan with changes to lots proposed along the northern boundary of the subdivision that front on E. Della Street. D. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on March 19 and April 16, 2020. At the public hearing on April 16`h, the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Hethe Clark b. In opposition: C. Commenting: Malissa Bernard; Laura Trairatnobhas;Michael Bernard; Sandi King;. Kenneth Clifford;Allie Crane d. Written testimony: Many letters of public testimony were received(see public record Hethe Clark(response to the revised staff report—in agreement except for two items: 1) requests DA provision#1D be revised to not restrict homes along the west boundary to a sin l�ry in height as previously proposed,to allow 2-story homes to be constructed; and 2)requests deletion of condition 42B,which regires construction of the 20' wide street buffer&detached sidewalk along the east side of Centrepointe to be constructed with the first phase of development to be deferred until the multi-family portion of the site develops.; e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. The HOA to the north(Alpine Point)requests the Dashwood stub street at the north boundary be vacated and sole vehicular access be provided to the site from the south via Centrepointe Way to keep traffic from cuttingthrough hrou,gh their neighborhood—this could also be accomplished with a,gate for emergency access only; feeling that the subdivision to the north is"overconnected"and more connections aren't necessary to Wainwright Dr. from the south, especially with Centrepointe planned to extend to Wainwright in the future, requests larger lots and single-story homes along boundary for a better transition;belief that funds should be provided by all development for improvement of the Eagle Rd. &Wainwright intersection; Page 18 Item#5. b. Concern pertaining to the impact the proposed development will have on the capacity of area schools; c. Frustration from the neighbors that they weren't aware that Dashwood was planned to be extended in the future as there were no signs erected at the end of the stub street; d. Concern pertaining to the removal of all of the existing evergreen trees(40+/-)along the southern boundary of the site and request for mitigation to be required the owner planned to cut the trees down for firewood); 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. The Commission asked the Applicant to clarify the status of the Nourse Lateral easement along the northern boundary of the site—the Applicant stated the Alpine Pointe Subdivision plat depicts a 15' wide easement for the piped lateral that exists on the adjacent property to the north within the easement;the Applicant also proposes to depict an additional easement on the subject plat in case it's needed for maintenance of the lateral; b. The transportation plan for this area and existing and planned connections to Wainwright c. Whether or not Dashwood should be extended to Centrepointe with the first phase of development as recommended by Staff, or extended as a temporary emergency access/pedestrian connection until Centrepointe is extended to Wainwright, or within 10 years,whichever occurs first—when Centrepointe is exended to Wainwright, Dashwood would be reconstructed as a public street for vehicular connectivity to Wainwright as required by ACHD. d. The Applicant's request for homes along the west boundary to not be restricted to sin l�ry in height and for the buffer and sidewalk along the east side of Centrepointe to not be constructed until development of the multi-family portion of the sib e. Support for retaining the existing trees or requiring mitigation for them if removed; f In support of fewer lots and lower density proposed; g. The timing for construction of the street buffer and sidewalk along the east side of Centrepointe Way(with the first phase as recommended by Staff or with the 3rd phase as proposed by the Applicant). 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Modify condition#A.1f to add language consistent with ACHD's decision pertaining to the extension of Dashwood to Centrepoint Way; and strike condition#A.5 in Section VIIl. b. Modify DA provision#A.ld in Section VIII to allow bonus rooms on sin lg e-story homes along the west boundary with no rear facing windows for the bonus rooms, C. Strike condition#A.2b in Section VIII,which requires the street buffer and sidewalk along the east side of Centrepointe Way to be constructed with the first phase of development to allow it to be constructed with the third phase as proposed; d. Include a condition requiring the Developer to retain as many trees as possible along the southern boundar(see modification to condition#A.3a). 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s)for City Council: a. If Council determines that all existing trees on the site being removed should require mitigation in accord with UDC standards, even those removed by the property owner for firewood,condition#A.3a in Section VIII should be modified accordingly. Page 19 Item#5. E. The Meridian City Council heard these items on May 12,2020. At the public hearing.the Council moved to deny the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Hethe Clark b. In opposition: c. Commenting: Frank Marcos: Malissa Bernard: Sandi King:Ken Clifford: Laura Trairatnobhas: Mike Bernard: Doreen Mills: Allie Crane: Tim Fritzlev: Sherry Garev: Randy Spiwak: Patty Pitzer: Thomas Hunt: Justin Lucas.ACHD d. Written testimony: Many letters of testimony were submitted(see public record). e. Staff presentin"application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: Joe Bongiomo: Warren Stewart 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Neighbors in Alpine Pointe Subdivision to the north request the following: Dashwood Pl. to be closed permanently as it was never meant to be extended and is designed as a cul-de-sac: single-level homes along north boundary:the identity of the Developer to be disclosed:not in favor of intensity of proposed R-40 zoning district: information on whether the proposed units will be owner occupied or rental units• b. Would like the existing trees along the southern boundary of the site to be retained and the height of homes on Lots 16 and 17.Block 5 to be restricted to a single-story in hem C. Request for the Developer to perform a utility survey for existing facilities, s ecjfically the Nourse Lateral: d. Request for a reduction in the number of lots along north boundary to six(61. e. Applicant requests restriction for sin le�story homes to be removed along west boundary(condition#lc)• f. Applicant requests condition#lf is modified to only require an emergeney access via Dashwood Pl. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Transition in lot sizes/configuration along north boundary: b. Retention of existing trees in the triangle common area at the southwest corner of the site and along the south boundary if possible-- e. Enrollment of area schools and impact on such by the proposed development; d. Discussion as to where jurisdietion of the City and land use and ACHD and transportation begins and ends: e. Removal of any connection to Dashwood Pl. except for emergency access or leave it open for interconneetivity: f. Requirement for mitigation of existing trees that are removed from the site. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation. a. City Council voted to deny the project due to their belief it is not in the best interest of the City to approve the project at this time due to connectivity reasons—they felt in order to solve the connectivity issues in this area. Centrepointe Way needs to be extended to Wainwright Dr. They determined there was no conditions of approval that could be placed on this project that would enable them to approve the project at this time. F. The Meridian City Council heard these items on July 28,2020. At the public hearing.the Council moved to approve the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Hethe Clark Page 20 Item#5. b. In opposition: Susan Mimura representing Mike&Malissa Bernard,Frank Marcos. Malissa Bernard,Laura Trairatnobhas,Patty Pitzer,Kenneth Clifford,Mike Bernard. Sandy King,Dave Martin C. Commenting: d. Written testimony: Many letters of testimony were submitted—see public record e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Request for Dashwood Pl.to not be extended as a public street and serve as emergency and pedestrian access only: b. Concern pertaining to the safety of residents on Dashwood Pl. and in Alpine Point Subdivision due to high traffic volume if Dashwood is exended into the development as a public street: C. Transition in lot sizes and density along the northern boundary of the subdivision isn't adequate—request for lar eg r lots: d. Desire of the assisted living facility to the east to not have traffic going through their site from this development with an access driveway stubbed to their property. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. The extension of Dashwood Pl. as a public street with this development or allowing it to be an emergency and pedestrian access only and not be exended: b. If Dashwood isn't required to be exended,the fourth phase of development isn't necessary and the phasing plan should be amended. 4. City Council change(sl to Commission recommendation: a. Council approved the project with the revised phasing plan presented b the licant but didn't require the extension of Dashwood Pl. as a public street(now or in the futurel —Dashwood will only provide emergency and pedestrian access to the proposed development. The emergency access shall be constructed with the first phase of development(see DA provisions#A.1 f-g and condition#A.5 in Section VIIII. VII. EXHIBITS A n....i;,.aa4 Proposed .e. Stag Reee..,,,,endea F„twe Land UseMaps Removed as an amendment to the FL UM is no longer necessary. Page 21 Item#5. B. Annexation&Zoning Legal Description and Exhibit Map REVISED Sawtooth Land Surveying, LLC �f ?030 S. 1Na5h+nc3ton Ave. Emmett, ID 63C 17 Delano Zoning R-8 Description BASIS OF BEARING for this description is South 89139'12"West, between the illegible brass cap marking the E1/4 Corner of Section 32 and the 5/8"rebar PLS 4431 marking the C114 Corner of Section 32, both in T.4 N., R. 1 E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. A parcel of land being a portion of Lot 3, Block 1 of Jasmine Acres, as shown in Book 59 of Plats, at Page 5829,Ada County Records, and a portion of the SE114 of Section 32,T. 4 N., R. 1 E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the illegible brass cap marking the E1/4 Corner of said Section 32; Thence South 89039'12"West, Coincident with the north line of said SE1f4 of Section 32, a distance of 1026.20 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1 of said Jasmine Acres and the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence South 0120'48"East, coincident with the west line of said Lot 1, a distance of 125.59 feet; Thence South 89"42'00"West, parallel with the south line of said Lot 3, a distance of 121.45 feet; Thence South 49130'18"West, 20.50 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left; Thence 43.46 feet along the arc of said curve,with a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 49148'18", subtended by a chord bearing North 65"23'51"West, 42.11 feet; Thence South 89042'00"West, parallel with said south line of Lot 3, a distance of 382.00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the left, Thence 78.54 feet along the arc of said curve,with a radius of 50,00 feet, a central angle of 90100'00" subtended by a chord bearing South 44142'00"West, 70.71 feet, Thence South 00118'00"East, 372.09 feet; Thence South 89042'00"West, parallel with said south line of Lot 3, a distance of 1C9.27 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the right; Thence 14.35 feet along the arc of said curve,with a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 16026 24", subtended by a chord bearing North 62004'48"West, 14.30 feet; Thence North 73°51'36"West, 18.22 feet to the westerly line of said Lot 3; Thence North 16008'24"East, coincident with the common line of said Lots 3 and 4, Block 1,Jasmine Acres, 25.45 feet to the northernmost common corner of said Lots 3 and 4; ?:12018%18fl94-DELANO SUBDIVISION-CMG%Surveyl❑rawingslDescriptions118094 zoning r-9 desc,docx Page 22 Item#5. Thence North 1010'44"east,comeident with the east boundary line of said Lot 4, a distance of 511.15 to the northeast corner of said Lot 4, which is on said north Fine of the 5F114; Thence North 89°39`12"East, coincident with said north line of the 5E1f4, a distance of 727,70 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described parcel contains 3.31 acres, more or less. 33 fry F BEAG�- RQ01 8NI 8094-DELANO SUB DIVISION-CIVIGISurvey%Drawings%Descriptions1jW94 zoning r-8 desc,docx iY Page 23 Item#5. xws of PEJAWS +Iw1r, m•iiw X3WVFeEuMW5 961�1Y7rti W R acwp+c it a e u+�'ee L W4 l7AIM L!a?'ME •] L3 u@� x I �P►4�4�J L JfFhFYeA� mi } � i R +{r S rrrx i ` 1m 3 M-M i r I.3okE A q se rbeB �. 11574 � zQ�o s.W'fuJilNGTpk AVE, �wo i oEL4Na ZONWO BOLL Q¢F' EMW T,10 83617 18094-a A& FP.'roffil 398..51�5 IW% BOUNDARY or T.a fit-R. I E.,S.M., SEA - a04 CAOLW r.u rea W2020 Ind=ti"" .J,[f[. 11M11 W-5A 4YT00TFH-512D" I OF I Page 24 Item#5. Sawtooth Land 5urveylncj, LLC AA, 2430 5,Wae-cwl 91or,Avc. I QA4 Narthvest Divi..`5t6.r- '4 E E"Avenue East ZW7'00! kmrmett,10 83b r T Coeur d'Aten�,Ip 6 381 4 Jeyrame,EQ 83338 P: (20b)3945•15!04 P:{zoaY T14-4544 P;(?08)32Es.5303 F (208)398.8 i 05 F:{205)252-4453 F.(205)324-35F 1 R-15 Re-Zone Description BASIS OF BEARING for this description is South 89"39'12"West,from the illegible brass cap marking the E1/4 Corner of Section 32 and the 518"rebar PLS 4431 marking the C1/4 Corner of Section 32, both in T.4 N., R. 1 E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. A parcel of land being a portion of Lot 3, Black 1 of Jasmine Acres, as shown in book 59 of Plats, at Page 5829, Ada County Records, and a portion of the N112 4f the 5112 of Section 32, T.4 N., R. 1 E., B.M.,Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the illegible brass cap marking the E1/4 Corner of said Seetion 32; Thence South 89039'12"West, coincident with the center of Section line of said Section 32, a distance of 102&20 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1 of said Jasmine Acres; Thence South 0"20'48"East, coincident with the west boundary line of said Lot 1, a distance of 12159 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing South 0'20'48"East,coincident with the west boundary line of said Lot 1, a distance of 221.24 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 3; North 89"42'00"East, coincident with the north boundary line of said Lot 3, a distance or 43.10 feet; Thence South 0018'00"East, 316.85 feet to the south boundary line of said Lot 3, Thence South 89042'00"West, coincident with the south boundary line of said Lot 3, a distance of 684.43 feet; Thence North 48111'00"West, coincident with the south boundary line of said Lot 3, a distance of 154.02 feet to the southernmost common corner of Lots 3 and 4 of said Jasmine Acres; Thence North 16"08'24"East, coincident with the common boundary line of Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Jasmine Acres, 25,45 feet; Thence South 73051'36" East, 18.21 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the left; Thence 14.35 feet along the arc of said curve, with a radius of 50.00 Feet, a central angle of 16¢26'24", subtended by a chord bearing South 82004'48"East, 14.30 feet; Thence North 891142'00"East, parallel with said south boundary line, 109.27 feet; Thence North 0"18'00"West, 372.09 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the right; P:120WB094-CELANC SL)13L]IVISION-CMGlSurveylOrawings%Descrip#ions\18094 R-15 RE-ZONE DESCRIPTION.docx 17 Page 25 Item#5. Thence 28.54 feet along the arc of said curve, with a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 90000'00", subtended by a chord hearing North 441142'00"East, 70.71 Feet; Thence North 89042'gg"East, parallel with said south boundary line, 382.00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the right; Thence 43.46 feet along the arc of said curve, with a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 49148'18", subtended by a chard bearing South 65023'51 East, 42.11 feet, Thence North 49030'18"East, 20.50 feet; Thence North 89142'00" East, parallel with said south boundary line, 121.45 Feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described parcel contains 8.12 acres, more or less. ND G% 4 1 � 574 4l Of� ► BEAD' 7:12018116024-DELAND SUBDIVISION-CMG4SurveyrtE)rawings%Descripti❑ns118094 R-15 RE-ZONE 7ESCRIPTION.docx 12 Page 26 Item#5. µ5y.7a�+.for Y TfF JJtle s�rrw — _ _ _ .-_ _ - — -- mpow +}7 d+' r 4M mwe� a/ivrpl'f �12 M "rR l fr OFfiViih4 �Y4tr�Yi s0}rtACIE6 Lord,aLcl � NNN n57 i fip RAS QT k RiniY i cr. ea �� LOr a i0IX i !i+�fP!ch N i M4�IlsT R L�'4�J �� YSg .oe yat Mrs RRLL*+ur L x r aaea S WASiNING70N AYE nAC• DELANGZC11 MR-15 8IXLGGk7K � E#im(200 9 -SJ04 1$G9�f BOUNDARY SrtMEJV�S.!CC P,((�88 3�R 81G'� �• F,006)356-81175 ]saw aoA COMTYr VAHO osrr. 1 ea�lrvg., 1lG 3JO�R IVWW 5A5YTOOT�AL''iCI�M J OF 2 Page 27 Item#5. 5awtooth Land Surveying, LLC 7--030 5. Washington Ave. 0,44 IJcrthwest 131,d., 5tc. G ;4 1 1"Avenue East rmmett. 10,531-17 Coeur d'Alene. ID 838 i 4 Jer(,me, ,p"3338 I ' F: ;208)396 8 i 04 P: (208)7 1 A 45,14 P:(208)325-5303 F: (208)39.5-5105 F: ;208}292-4453 F: (2aS)32A-382 R-40 Re-Zone Description BASIS OF BEARING for this description is South 89039'12"West, from the illegible brass cap marking the E1/4 Corner of Section 32 and the 5/8"rebar PLS 4431 marking the C1/4 Corner of Section 32, both in T. 4 N., R. 1 E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. A parcel of land being a portion of Lot 3, Block 1 of Jasmine Acres, as shown in Book 59 of Plats, at Page 5829, Ada County Records, located in the NE1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 32, T. 4 N., R. 1 E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the illegible brass cap marking the E1/4 Corner of said Section 32; Thence South 89039'12"West, coincident with the north line of said SEI/4 of Section 32, a distance of 1026.20 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1 of said Jasmine Acres; Thence South 0"20'48"East, coincident with the west boundary line of said Lot 1, a distance of 346.83 feet to the northwest comer of said Lot 3; Thence North 89"42'00" East, coincident with the north boundary line of said Lot 3, a distance of 43.10 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing, North 89"42'00" East, coincident with said north boundary line of Lot 3, a distance of 521.16 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 3; Thence South 0001'00"East, coincident with the east boundary line of said Lot 3, a distance of 316.85 feet to the southeast comer of said Lot 3; Thence South 89042'40"West, coincident with the south boundary line of said Lot 3, a distance of 519.60 feet; Thence North 00018'00"West, 316.85 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described parcel contains 3.79 acres, more or less. d IS r574 OF ln�� BEAC+V P 20M18094-DELANO SUBDI VISION-CMGISurveyMrawingMDescriptions118094 R-40 RE-ZONE ❑ESCRIPTION.docx It Page 28 Item#5. M-38 OF eb+wrci a wmtr w rias impm?r L4 .— — iv*? SPC]; sc ELM LU�'�Fa C{A CY1*H9! F lQf L JLpa I apffpdrAcm 99W TJAE Li n awTr vJ.]r — z 8 � I A"IV.-! I$ {III � � I r ♦ [4r 3 Q4a J E-LUFM dM I sm JL HTS k 1 4 "apKr- °" A;& a s w. rcro w AVE. BOLL ' o �7E .L!C ID 4 7 q Y � 10 8 x a COUNTY, DAHO imm. + fZQ20 �J, WWW.5AWT0l nM.COM !OF1 Page 29 Item#5. C. Preliminary Plat(date: 2/ 4�n 3/12/2020)&Phasing Plan REVISED IA I■oo k WNW powme NbRK�W Lw �[1�@X IM■IR QM�fJ 1ECX+1J -__ Ti 4 ; RW' I r. I ■ I � rra �. 1. Y I •�� n Page 30 Item#5. 1 w . [7ELAW[7 tiiiBF�Y�$IC7H nu�atu.R 1C1 Page 31 D. Landscape Plan(date: 2/20QO19 3/14/2020) REVISED wo7ft M.Aw rJ%Lerrff WAWA%. PM Nut- Wiff m� raw- -!rF- V!W PNL Wl— ,Win LU Lmh h� �TEG FLANr F,*Lvm =xi 4k L 1 E 11-11rit 11-1 rL%k t-u-L �MW I- LAbPWAM WO iw%LCULdLrk:t4S ,6MftEmftftmfi%,i LJ �,�-7r LAADWrAM Page32 Item#5. E. Possible Conceptual Development Plan for Parcel to the North l Ro551bl2 Future Development Pattern -- I� I Page 33 Item#5. F. Qualified Open Space Exhibit& Site Amenities REVISED i i i i I , _ � - 'ME, 1.17 acres of qualified open " space without crossed out area IEMMMnAL AMA-=+F.aOfAlEs *3LV MGOMM 9Nrk LIA ACM118.E Note: The crossed out area does not count toward the minimum qualified open space standards because it isn't accessible at the west end,per UDC 11-3G-3B.le. Page 34 Item#5. PROJECT AMENITIES As the developer we have researched and interviewed potential homeowners and followed the city ordinance to plan the most productive amenities for this area and this development. The amenity package exceeds the requirement of Meridian City Code. Meridian City Code requires that the application provide one amenity for projects up to 20 acres.We are proposing five additional amenities for a total of six, including a neighborhood park with a shade structure, a play structure,seating area, climbing boulders,climbing dome and a pedestrian pathway.We are proposing a second open space lot on the southwest corner of the development. This lot will help to buffer the existing home in the Champion Park Subdivision and will include several amenities including public art and a seating area. Proposed Amenities: Large 2/3-Acre Neighborhood Park-The large park will contain the following recreation facilities: Shade Structure Play structured Seating areas with benches Climbing Dome Climbing Boulders a, Public Art F is GLITHiN gOE1LOEiZri,z l .t If (1�'P1N;G 'TER is S .. . tv7h .n1 r{: •• w.7 4 Page 35 Item#5. G. Conceptual Building Elevations(Single-Family^Detached and Multi-Family Apartments)REVISED PROPOSED HOME ELEVATIONS MD HOUSING SMES - i Phi 17 i i I law r � wN Page 36 Item#5. '�' a •i.�� r. " r• � f� 4 �r■ �.'� Ir moo � � r Page 37 ■rf i Item#5. H. Parking Exhibit REVISED Alf 58 parking spaces MEL PLAN Ll Page 39 Item#5. I. Site Plan _I1-TF t7- r - 1P 13LLAW MALL MLM N1 LAYa1 VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION I. A Development Agreement(DA)is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat,phasing plan, landscape plan and conceptual building elevations included in Section VII and the provisions contained herein. Page 40 Item#5. b. A Conditional Use Permit is required to be submitted and approved for the multi-family development prior to application for Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review. c. All multi-family structures shall comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. An application for Design Review and Certificate of Zoning Compliance shall be submitted and approved for all multi-family structures prior to submittal of building permit applications. d. Single-family homes along the west and north perimeter boundaries of the development shall be restricted to a single-story in height as proposed by the Developer. Homes along the west boundary are allowed to have a bonus room but no rear facing windows shall be allowed for the bonus room. e. The rear and/or side of 2-story structures on Lots 8-12,Block 1 and Lot 2,Block 5 that face N. Centrepointe Way shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays, banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. f. The construction of N. Centrepointe Way from the southern boundary to the northern boundary of the annexation area(stub to Wong parcel#R4582530100) shall occur with the first phase of development. The eei*ieetion of Pashweed Ave. to the existi—e Stub street to the .,..tl. (Pas4weed PH ; ,7 to A iv=Pccr usirccnr�jviizi��-rixcT�cn��-icccc�scnicc t€n-(r n ccr ,wzictieveT-vBcai-sz�t When C cir repviito Way is cxtc iu car t 6 eenneetivity to Wainwr-ight Dr. as r-eEwir-ed by ACHED. g. Emergency access via Dashwood Pl. at the north boundary of the development shall be provided with the first phase of development. Dashwood Pl. is not required to be extended as a public street(now or in the future)-and will serve as an emergency and pedestrian access only. h. The R-8 and R-15 zoned property totaling 11.3+/-acres shall provide a minimum of 1.13 acres and the R-40 zoned property totaling 3.6+/-acres shall provide a minimum of 0.36 of an acre of qualified open space in addition to the open space required in UDC 11-4-3- 27C for multi-family developments. i. Provide vehicular connection to the property to the east(Parcel#R4582530202)through the R-40 zoned property via a local street or a driveway as set forth in UDC 11-3A-3A.3. If a driveway is provided,provide a cross-access/ingress-egress easement to that property; submit a recorded copy of the easement to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. j. No building permits shall be issued on this site until the underlying property is recorded in a final plat. 2. The preliminary plat included in Section VII.B, shall be revised at least 10 days prior-to the City Getineil hearing as follows: a. Depiet an easement for-the Noufse Later-a!along t4e aoi4h betinda-r-y of the site. if the easement is 10 feet or-9fea4er-, 4 shall be laeated within a eewAHefi lot tha4 is a w4aimm 20 feet wide and otitside of a feneed area tmiess modified by City Gatineil as set fefth in Page 41 Item#5. effepedeh on this site-, submit wriMem eei+firniation ofisuehftoni the Irrigation Distriet. b. The street buffer and minimum 5 feet wide detaehed sidewalk on the east side of N. Geatfepoiate Way shall be ineluded in the first phase(instead of the third phase) e d&velepmeat;the phase boundar-y shall be adjusted aeeor-Eliagl�- 3. The landscape plan included in Section VILC shall be revised tit le6tst 10 Flays pr-ior to th-e City Gouneil hearing as follows: a. Include mitigation information on the plan for any existing trees on the site that are not removed by the residential property owner for fire wood in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-10C.5. As many existing trees as possible along the southern boundary of the site shall be retained on the site. b. Include the linear feet of parkways and the required vs. proposed number of trees in the Landscape Calculations table demonstrating compliance with the standards in UDC I I- 3A-17 and 11-313-7C. c. Include the linear feet of street buffers and the required vs.proposed number of trees in the Landscape Calculations table demonstrating compliance with the standards in UDC 11-3B-7C. d. Depict trees and shrubs in the minimum 20-foot wide street buffers along N. Centrepointee Way in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. 4. The 50-foot wide private street easement(i.e. Jasmine Lane) shall be relinquished where it crosses the subject property. Proof of relinquishment shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 5. NeAh Dashweed P1. shall be eK4ended as a full aeeess street into the site with the first ph 6. Local street access (or a driveway with a cross-access easement) shall be provided to the property to the east of the R-40 zoned property(Parcel#R4582530202) as set forth in UDC 11-3A-3A.3. The Applicant should coordinate with the developer of that property on a location for the access. If a driveway is provided, a recorded copy of the cross-access easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer for the phase in which it is located(third phase). 7. For lots accessed by common driveways, an exhibit shall be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks, fencing,building envelope and orientation of the lots and structures. Driveways for abutting properties that aren't taking access from the common driveway(s) shall be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line away from the common driveway. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited unless separated by a minimum 5-foot wide landscaped buffer. 8. Provide address signage for homes accessed by the common driveways on Lot 5, Block 1 and 9,Block 4 for emergency wayfinding purposes. 9. A perpetual ingress/egress easement is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder for all common driveways,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. A copy of the recorded easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Page 42 Item#5. 10. All existing structures on the site shall be removed prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat phase in which they are located. 11. Parking is restricted to only one side of the 27-foot wide street sections; signage shall be installed prohibiting parking on one side of the street to ensure emergency access can be provided. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 A street light plan will need to be included in the final plat application. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the City's Design Standards. A copy of the standards can be found at http://Www.meridianciU.oMIpublic_works.aspx?id=272 1.2 The following proposed manholes have less than 3'of cover: A-3,A-4,A-5, C-1 and D-5. Public Works has previously discussed with the applicant the possibility of using grinder pumps in these shallow areas,but the plans do not note the use of them. If the parcel to the north of the multi-family is to be served by Meridian, applicant must stub sewer at minimum slope in N. Centrepointe Way to the north boundary line. 1.3 Each phase must be modeled to ensure adequate fire flow. 1.4 Public Works has met with SUEZ Water and agreed that water service to the north for the multi-family portion of the development will be provided according to how annexation proceeds. Meridian will provide water in Meridian, and SUEZ will provide water in Boise. If the area being considered for inclusion is to be served by the City of Meridian, the Public Works Department would like to have a completed water main loop north to the existing water main in E. Wainwright Drive. The purpose of this loop is not for flow and pressure reasons,it is to create redundancy and for mitigation of water quality concerns created by dead end mainlines. 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2"x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B)for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a Page 43 Item#5. note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year- round source of water(MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals,or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at(208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. Page 44 Item#5. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond.Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=184561&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit X D. POLICE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=184570&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit X E. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO(COMPASS) hyp://web link.meridiancity.org_/weblink8/0/doc/165379/Pa eg 1.aspx F. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT http://weblink.meridiancity.org wweblink8/0/doc/16523IlPagel.aspx Page 45 Item#5. G. SETTLER'S IRRIGATION DISTRICT http://weblink.meridianci U.org/weblink8/0/doc/164812/Pagel.aspx H. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT http://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink&DocView.aspx?id=165010&dbid=0 L DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) http://weblink.meridianciU.org wweblink8/0/doc/164959/Pagel.aspx J. WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT(WASD) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=179144&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ky K. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https:llweblink.meridiancity.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=183358&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Lu https://weblink.meridiancity.orgj ebLink/DocView.aspx?id=169441&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ky L. CITY OF BOISE https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/browse.aspx?id=184571&&dbid=0&&repo=Meridian Ci Page 46 Item#5. IX. FINDINGS A. Comprehensive Plan Alap Amendment UPOR Fecommendation from the Commission, the Gotifleil shall make a full investig the ConTFehensive Plan—,the Getmeil shall make the following fifldings-. 1. The proposed amend-ment is eonsistepA with the other-elements of the CofnpFehensive Plan. The Conintissionfinds the proposed map amendment and FLUM designation QNIUR is 2. The proposed amendment provides an impr-owd guide to ftA+we gr-&Mh a-ad development ef the eity. adjustment tom, tl h A- ,, ..�T,,., l,t 1.eu iw . 3. The proposed amendment is ipAemally eansistepA with the Goals, Objeetives and Polieies of the Compr-eh-fisive Plan. 4. The proposed amendment is eensistepA with the Unified Development Code. Tl,.,.,,1,.,.,,.,.ent C„a„ 5. The amendment will be eompatible with existing and plafmed stiffounding!a-nd uses. residential andfuture eemimer-eial uses. 6. The proposed ameodmen4 will not bufden existing and planned sey-viee eapabilities. The C-omMission finds that the preposed amendment wiU not burden ffisting andplann extended te this site. allows suffieien4 area to mitigate any antieipated impaet asseeiated with the deveiepmefft of the area. Page 47 Item#5. g The-proposed a-mendment; in toe best ipAe-est of the City of Mer-idian. the proposed aniendment is in the best interest of the 00,ifiMe pareel to the north is also B. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-513-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the proposal to annex and develop the subject property with R-8, R-15 and R-40 zoning is consistent with the MDR and MU-R FL UM designations. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment and development is consistent with the purpose statement of the residential districts in that it would contribute to the range of housing opportunities consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment and subsequent development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The City Council finds that City services are available to be provided to this development. The School District has submitted comments, included in Section VIII.J, that currently show student enrollment is below capacity for the elementary school and within the capacity for the middle school and high school once Owyhee High School is opened,- the City Council finds the proposed map amendment would not result in an adverse impact on the school district. 5. The annexation(as applicable) is in the best interest of city. The City Council finds the proposed annexation and development is in the best interest of the City. C. Preliminary Plat(UDC 11-613-6) 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; (Ord. 08-1372, 7-8-2008, eff. 7-8-2008) The City Council finds the proposed plat is generally in conformance with the UDC and the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds public services can be made available to the subject property and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development. Page 48 Item#5. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; The City Council finds the proposed plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's CIP. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The City Council finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public safety and general welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. (Ord. 05-1170, 8- 30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) The City Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that would need to be preserved with this development. shall detefFnifte the feflewiftg- z. StT-iet adher-enee or-appliea4ioa of the r-e"ir-efnents 0 2. The altemative complianee provides an equal or- Is for-meeting 0 0 0s; a nfeetingMe-requi-remenky in UDG 11 3G-3-. 3. The altemative means will not be mater-ially detr-ifnen4a!to the publie welfafe or-impair-the intended uses and ehar-aeter-of sth-Founding pr-opeAies-. Stafffin6b the alter-native means ef eentp4,ing with tDC2 11 3G 3 will net be ma�er4a!4 the high densh�,and medium densh�,residential uses and 2 amd 3 s",stmetures. Page 49 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Gyro Subdivision (H-2020- 0061) by Tealey's Land Surveying, Located at 3030 E. Magic View Dr. Item#6. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI N~' AND DECISION&ORDER A, In the Matter of the Request for a Short Plat to create two buildable lots,by Tealey's Land Surveying. Case No(s).H-2020-0061 For the City Council Hearing Date of: July 28,2020 (Findings on August 11,2020) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(GYRO SHORT PLAT—FILE#H-2020-0061) - I - Item#6. reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Short Plat is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-613-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I- 6B-7C). E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28)days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521,any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,Idaho Code. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(GYRO SHORT PLAT—FILE#H-2020-0061) -2- Item#6. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 1 Ith day of August 2020 COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED AYE COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED AYE MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 8-11-2020 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(GYRO SHORT PLAT—FILE#H-2020-0061) -3- Item#6. EXH I BIT A STAFF REPORTC�WE IDIANn-=- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A H O HEARING 7/28/2020 Legend DATE: TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Alan Tiefenbach,Associate Planner 208-498-0573 - - - -- SUBJECT: H-2020-0061 Gyro Short Plat LOCATION: 3030 E. Magic View Drive - .00 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant proposes a Short Plat to create two(2)buildable lots on approximately 0.973 acres in the L-O zoning district. IL APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Pat Tealey—Tealey's Land Surveying— 12594 W. Explorer Drive, Boise,ID 83713 B. Owner: Douglas Miller-412 E. Parkcenter Blvd,Tuite 205,Boise,ID 83706 C. Representative: Jeff Hatch,Hatch Design Architecture—200 W. 361" Street, Boise,ID 83714 III. NOTICING City Council Posting Date Newspaper Notification 7/10/2020 Radius notification mailed to properties within 300 feet 7/8/2020 Page 1 Item#6. IV. STAFF ANALYSIS The Applicant proposes to subdivide the subject property(Lot 3 Block 1 of the Boyd Subdivision) into a new plat consisting of 2 lots. The eastern 0.60 acres(Lot 1)will contain an existing restaurant (Gyro Shack). The western vacant 0.38 acres will be separated into Lot 2. The subject property is approximately 0.97 acres,is located in the northwest quadrant of S. Eagle Road and E.Magic View Drive, and is zoned L-O. The property was annexed into the City in early 2000 and is regulated under Development Agreement No. 100021869. The Development Agreement restricts the land use to professional office uses only. In 2002,the Development Agreement was amended(#102067379)to allow a drive through restaurant at the southeast portion of the property. Concurrently with the amended development agreement, a conditional use(CUP 01-045)was approved to allow a 1,700 square foot Subway Restaurant(with a drive through.)A Certificate of Zoning Compliance(CZC 02-060)for the Subway was approved in November of 2002 and the Subway was constructed. In 2019,the Subway was converted into a Gyro Shack. The western portion of the site(at the corner)has remained undeveloped.Five-foot wide sidewalks have already been installed along the entire lengths of E. Magic View Drive and S. Allen Street,but landscape buffers only exist along street frontages adjacent to the developed portions of the property. Staff has reviewed the proposed short plat for substantial compliance with the criteria set forth in UDC I I-6B-5 and deems the short plat to be in substantial compliance with said requirements. Per UDC 11-213-3, a 10' landscape buffer is required along E.Magic View Drive(a local road) and a 20' wide landscape buffer is required along S. Allen Street(a collector road).UDC 11-313-7-2b requires all commercial, industrial and other nonresidential street buffers to be on a common lot or in a permanent dedicated buffer,maintained by the property owner or business owners'association. Also, UDC 11-3A-3 states"where access to a local road is available,the applicant shall reconfigure the site circulation plan to take access from such local street.Where access to a local street is not available, the property owner shall be required to grant cross access/ingress easements to adjoining properties."The developed portion of the site (proposed as Lot 1)presently takes access from E. Magic View Drive, a local road. There is no access to Lot 2 from S. Allen Street. The applicant should be required to dedicate cross access easements from Lot 1 to Lot 2 as a condition of approval of this short plat. It is important to note the existing conditional use only allows restaurant uses on the southeastern portion of the property(Lot 1). If any future use is proposed for Lot 2 other than professional offices, another conditional use will be required. Staff has reviewed the requested short plat proposal and has determined that it meets the criteria for approval per UDC 11-613-5. V. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed short plat with the conditions noted in Section VII of this report. B. The Meridian City Council heard this item on July 28,2020.At the public hearing,the Council moved to approve the subject short plat request. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: Page 2 Item#6. a. In favor: Douglas Miller.Owner b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Douglas Miller.Owner d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Alan Tiefenbach f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. None 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. None Page 3 Item#6. VI. EXHIBITS A. Existing Boyd Subdivision PLAT SHOWING BOYD SUBDIVISION GREENHILL ESTATES NO-3 BOOK 43 PAGE 34-87 n SM)ATED IN LOT 2 aF BLOCK ! OF 4x MED WMC VEM SUBDIVISION c� JQ AS RMORDED TN BOON 88 AT PAGE 4446 , S89'58'42*W 781.00' (761-CIV) +.5 4p]1 S89'59'42-W 391.88' WCATED IN A 1`01MOM OF RHE SEE/4 OF THE NRIl A OF SECTION 17 TO►NSW S NOWMR RANGE I RA3T,DOESE IE8R1DUN Do3nlc PIIBl1C R.O.W. LEGEND 2002 NRT.He. OOpl4fipp 1_ 12; ---+- RrmpC—9p--p 2 LOT NMMR Ig ------ RO-V-1 CC-WRLM ivrI LOT NIMMR- NMD w C v(r$Lft M jE. ST. LURES STREET it L T uRE Ra-ErErrcc mm "—"---------- F: MT ENrE aAD r. R C M TES ORuru.GE rvtl IMioAtM ! r ___-___ USTIND PUTTED LM LINE 125./5' FAS Wm UWNSq E><STINC EA5FNf7++LINE SBr2z'27'E-na.ae_,__ Fa..OF BE6I I.NC m SEE 5/8'REW FOUND 9fh.55 W FOUND 51B'FIE -.S 2831 . 1. • SET /112a'AE�+R eae, 'n I eLdas2'4rt a Rourlo+Iz'� I I f �� 70.0V' I e uuTEO R jf 1 ` �C /3'�zr xLHce L.rNES:CO I ' -yT5_ L?Z w/GaP WIRM1Ep L5.WO1 2 EA5E11ENT SEE NOTE+6 r m G 1. k".N xnoek.ww"--- arenfre.r uw aOM'sa.Ma11 W i•wm{imu nim 1n.oFpkcmw'°^aK y � N3g,2.,� z _P �v.nnea m.W wwbn.mm. APO' q ^ 2. wy ----k.1.un d uN.p+..e.canopy wln w vo�ceey ta:.g r4y.nlone t✓nca 1rt w em4 er s.as' see'sz'rr'w o I v �2.52' v t N p (yy�� ]. eN xR k,n cwnnwn m tlr RmLla ryrt-w-nry one Nu�Oa1e,dery M1w lan o i.n fm1[10'1 x+d. w(� ` ' },W �pnec�wn•W u< �a dE0.1 Aar xM C.Nwq.�rd�ec.�.H m eocn Iwwnr.�ux..unnr,ta.nd. FSaQ S3' 3F' I k N j 6Gal ♦ ifu!+•Yq..vy/or avw.doll congb wk.Itivho Lae.11-5M5 n Ib Ore.Nlw iMl m%K 1,is SmoME�m...Ilxarr wen •nH wMM M ir+yea/Gvu'w.dcM1 Pp,w �M rw tlr p 7 k 33 w1.x�ou �r e.wnW Man B.yvbon/a+�M�.p.d.bx. CIO e. M h �om.a�2m.ka N..�e.nn,.n m tO.1 and z.m«k 1.m.h— S w n.ew.r4 ar aau.. 1 C real SBY5T'l]'lY I6'.GCA' 7 �I ;b 7. TM oonern.r~01 prydWS Wfto WIN N*A n nwf—d 12 wfr mow Nw RO1+N WftW.d nIw1.nN 9+anOdn.La.d.wtim. .+!.�R IN,xn5n w.m.nt 1—ing W 3.RreY 1 r rCM k'4d.1w !M "M10 U d lat Z Bbck 1 01 . I � r SWOY1FT � •'."+47 w.a.a...c.earemme e.nMHliq L.oen,me 2,bxN 1 r Nxe�n okvq lr N4Nhy CwMw7 Rf SBP52'41 W -TER SFJPVIEE EASEYEIR 202J.' rt�r R S��E . TR�Psrc rp W p..rr,.rt r ba 0+M a to ,sawnven d wt 3.lack 1 w hp and w nceMea BENMFl LOT 1 BEk[FlnC T r.lnyn.n! 1 1� SEE NOTE�8 C I p,gy [ .IOTE}i I 7.m,W' �I I kEFENEHCE DJ1TL• I I ]AP]'P.u.0.L R.O.S�M. w na.%O1r6p� I I LOT SUmmARY: TOT.L LOTS:3 b v w b Toi Bu LMME LQTS:3 .0w,P..d.r. J - Tp11L ACREAC,E:2.85 SCFLL ,'..0' I I I INfiTROkSN+w0.+020fi123a vs•ST'o10u� v { E rIPTE�19 ti.. 27i.7.2' NWOI'WW 1/4 6pp- iW neL.k:P. fhl 1 1 f ,r,2.Jp ._.. r-----_ - PINNACLE --sao�37 02 w P6 7 f f` S69'3]'02'11' CUD'C TN.eLE w5i.no.f000fa5l2 "' law' Numm 1EN4TN FVpOS DELin iu10 LNd1e LNEIRD BRO 0, d' L"-___—_—_—. C1 11.51 tam 16]5 y Engineers. Inc" rt —0 sc of 41-4' ,t14 SHEET 1 OE 2 .{mN1 eNa-ne0 Page 4 Item#6. B. Proposed Short Plat LEGEND F i 41w Nr PLAT OF __---__ F.LgAF FrIIWPW 4 RC-MO90h OF LOT,i,AU'SS�, dl}YJ 9MIg941+, ■ FG WY�11-RLIh ph Al�{�, LT1M6 IN THE ME i f 4,ECi1CN TT,T.2N.,Ji JE..B.M. • SL 5M.k ju.it 11 MI F?PAP r�y��Ty • SKT 1!£1 2Y'NOW PM1 WCPF E_FT._Uktg ST. NERHM.AWL W Ai 1,IWO OIRNYL 16i WK 20.20 LOT L.FIR [ i:A,Il��R IRFT.R• IS 5 3f. W - FrrT�IwL 8 .IZTr 1 IF [CPLF N HIT =TC' LQT Z. 6L[i:=F. 1NOUS m IFv I �� almul0.+ D11TG `.uP Glwlal'rl - A.y•5$'��.�f 9fi25A�� -��ftTr--� RlA1• cr •• IiaTU P�1imlmdwrt V smuw.VZ7 Tn y ,yr i�gTJ' m wFTu Tx[ ==M[__M T[rg1Y.4TOF PHIrt9�No• �rc�XF/,Tle PTn = .54plP+i FPO-TTF�-f'F■W PIWTM P11MT.XO 17 W TF LUTl D'hi It - '.'. ••TFP W WT IFFI'PRKWP F"�A.,I 04 PPi5TTY1+14KI GT Tn URI .1W1,w MLA ay�,� w I WA-PT MO M•N:16TFM T=M TO F ,cT FFRa TFP MR-7 I NHnikh Lr.•3!Mf ,�•y�r'� u;:.' �T C i M'k111g1 TrilEa inp F.SJI I.aT r1.J.PF 4lJftT Ta N.a R9'/AXT S.TXi YF}T m ecx RlT it FIR To I ,• J HOTb�AB11�1p'.OnOlf 4]INUIKII. 1P' al ` 1PPFRFf V.lF' 411 a !!�n yl ._LL h 14Mi.T1lnA nxl TFMi mw' wFgR�o-,�Fri°a"mo[uTT]I�.T Sllti!x:r�ir .�I 1 .S 1 y CLG FF 4 [FM¢aJmrAa[I.Z—T1.11TFx4F[NmFTLw¢I TIa<w"T .r E C$ xvr T awvo.a war�Tm��Txa on s.mow 91 nI IT 2 Lr� 0T I IC a J•= 1 w N w+-+aRHFm awnwi R.Fv1 FhTF4 L Tw DUM T I 5 �� FF} IT TK TW G Ifxll+CF W WLW IF"M. I_ -- F.TV 111 T h lLL'x.TP:F FnL.HYC I d[Plcl MN L K!R"M�1a 1 1. i W G "M: A ,y TM HLICNT N..Igl!#1.did WAP L TM. mI f3`.'JCH I :d 1-.` w TFe IelaweXT cswrra�`wi+ mcn TFa exa[me,aon r w .`Tn�'iµ%_mFanais F ae.ro.n T�"ic am�w��cx`d�"rr`:1[rtmlc u•rleur I .m a,.aTcn�nw.a-n.,T�rrTRc rt IM=IFS.N arw•Tr•x rx T r nw RIMIY-:[1�[iFlrr Tn o ;HT TTIF W IT WOra WF[�.s�IF'FMi �TVRPRM-of IMd ce WR P W rFM i ■,■P. 4 'XaL.kT[•FH -HR a W N�fF HnS TP FPM TW 1a1F R of 4%RF•T u POBtl[ ��M P NMTIM Mgpx W.T k FFEP 1T NRNIMTMM Flan M J. W'n.wR�r RS NF.Iota A{ ..T1 -T•i II:L "M! ar6 Lo.�l'Ilti+-W' rT h TIC T11�.4 _w.ao• _ .;_'1"T' __ _ m .�c .nx nwr xrriw+nTe.rmwexnor�u rr.nec rFu..n.1 N ffi'7T'R2'L 262 A7' I w•va4m. .lortn'e.n[ere7ltra M4[Aeo�cl,Trs rm Ic.c r.s arslnu�o.T ac-eavNm-arty acrlee ar•e. �+ - fi 1•aTFP W.FF F.(iJF�T PWFFRlas,Oi i.h.9L I K uaTFp ry'a'x - - - --- •n�5A{Y rKelt _ _J LIFdMI aiI MH. kf .,W.MTNHaWT WMkaMK�IF�JM2a�x WT■AQL VEW DRIVE x1-Pa.1lPIm lP.nwrFd lr r FHumll•FMroa WIF ICT. '1 { PEFI]Fi{7 11F �l rl9 VE:Y FI[y 1N�� • II I nleu�ruu 347, , "Vk1 PrCUl6 1 1 e4ay Il 16 •. ® Tl�AL�lY'6 LJlla#IIRYEY!!R lewa..I:m wl��nrr,ylF R^ olc e.uTN wy FaN=r.. raJFcS ha {}}' SFq■t' of'. Page 5 Item#6. VII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. The short plat prepared by Patrick Tealey of Teley's Land Surveying included in Section VI.B shall be revised as follows: a) The plat shall be revised to reflect a common lot or permanent dedicated buffer easement sufficient to contain a 20' landscape buffer along S. Allen Road and 10' wide buffer along E. Magic View Drive. b) Add a note to the plat that specifies the shared access between the two lots or graphically depict a cross-access/ingress-egress easement between Lot 1 and Lot 2 in accord with the provisions of UDC 11-3A-3A2. c) Add a note to the plat that prohibits direct lot access to S. Allen Street. d) N. Allen Street on the plat shall be replaced with S. Allen Street. 2. Prior to the City Engineer's signature on the plat, a landscape plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval,which meets the street buffer requirements of UDC 11-313-7. Required street buffers will be comprised of landscaping type and density consistent with what has already been installed along S. Allen Street to the north and E. Magic View Drive to the east. 3. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development(AZ 99-022, DA 100021869,DA 102067379, CUP 01-045, CZC 02-060). 4. If the City Engineer's signature has not been obtained within two(2)years of the City Council's approval of the short plat,the short plat shall become null and void unless a time extension is obtained,per UDC 11-613-7. 5. Development of any lot shall require submission of Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review per UDC-I 1-5B-1 and shall meet all applicable requirements of City of Meridian code. 6. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the previous approvals as noted in condition 3. above,does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions: 1. Each lot shall be required to have independent water and sewer services. Any existing services that are not to be used, or happen to be outside of the standard locations shall be abandoned per the Public Works Department requirements. General Conditions: 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via existing mains adjacent to the development. 2. Water service to this site is available via existing mains adjacent to the development. 3. All improvements related to public life,safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set Page 6 Item#6. forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff,the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City.The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 10. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 11. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 12. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 13. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 14. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 15. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the proj ect. 16. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide Page 7 Item#6. for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2" x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 17. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 18. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. VIII. REQUIRED FINDINGS FROM THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE In consideration of a short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: A. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the Unified Development Code; The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use of this property as Commercial.The current zoning district of the site is L-O. The proposed short plat complies with the Comprehensive Plan and is developed in accord with UDC standards. B. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; Staff finds that public services are adequate to serve the site. C. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvements program; Staff finds that the development will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds.All required utilities are being provided with the development of the property at the developer's expense. D. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; Staff finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing supporting services. The developer and/or future lot owner(s) will finance improvements for sewer, water, utilities and pressurized irrigation to serve the project. E. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and Staff finds the proposed short plat will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. F. The development preserves significant natural,scenic or historic features. Staff is not aware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features associated with the development of this site. Page 8 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Hill's Century Farm North (H- 2020-0080) by Kody Daffer, Brighton Development, Inc., Generally Located South of E. Amity Rd. and East of S. Eagle Rd. Item#7. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C��fIEK AND DECISION& ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Modification to the Existing Development Agreement(Inst. #2020-059662—provision #5.1g) to Allow Building Permits for the Commercial Portion of the Development to be Issued prior to Subdivision of the Property,by Brighton Development. Case No(s).H-2020-0080 For the City Council Hearing Date of: July 28,2020 (Findings on August 11,2020) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019, Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH—MDA H-2020-0080 - I - Item#7. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for a modification to the existing Development Agreement(Inst.No. 2020-059662) is hereby approved per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28)days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH—MDA H-2020-0080 -2- Item#7. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 1 lth day of August 2020. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 8-11-2020 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH—MDA H-2020-0080 -3- Item#7. EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 7/28/2020 Legend DATE: ff Projeci Lacfliar TO: Mayor&City Council rflu FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 r SUBJECT: H-2020-0080 x i Hill's Century Farm North-MDA LOCATION: South of E. Amity Rd. &east of S. Eagle Rd.,in the NW 1/4 of Section 33, Township 3N.,Range 1E. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Modification to the existing Development Agreement(Inst. #2020-059662—provision#5.1 g)to allow building permits for the commercial portion of the development to be issued prior to subdivision of the property. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Applicant: Kody Daffer, Brighton Development—2929 W. Navigator Rd.,ID 83642 B. Owner: Martin L. Hill—3675 E. Amity Rd.,Meridian, ID 83642 C. Representative: Kody Daffer, Brighton Development—2929 W. Navigator Rd.,ID 83642 III. STAFF ANALYSIS The Applicant proposes to amend provision#5.1g in the existing Development Agreement(DA)(Inst. #2020-059662),to allow for building permits to be issued in the commercial portion of the development prior to subdivision of the property as currently required. The existing provision reads,"The annexation area shall be subdivided prior to issuance of any building permits beyond those required for the development of the school, YMCA and park site, a wireless communication facility, the assisted living facility, medical clinic, and the Hill's Century Farm North community center complex on common lot 101 as shown on the revised conceptual development plan dated October 30,2019." Page 1 Item#7. EXHIBIT A The Applicant proposes the following change: "The residential portions of the annexation area shall be subdivided prior to issuance of any building permits beyond those required for the development of commercial uses, including but not limited to the se eel, YN4GA a-E ,.ark site a wireless communication facility, the assisted living facility, media' eliai-e and the Hill's Century Farm North self-service storage facility and the community center complex on common lot 101 as shown on the revised conceptual development plan dated October 30,2019." Because commercial property is not typically required to be subdivided prior to issuance of building permits, Staff recommends the existing provision is stricken and alternate language is provided instead that would simplify the requirements for subdivision of the property,which Staff believes meets the Applicant's intended purpose, as follows: "The R-8 and R-15 zoned residential portions of the annexation area shall be subdivided prior to issuance of any building permits beyond those required for the community center complex on Lot 101 as shown on the revised conceptual development plan dated October 30,2019;buildingpermit(s)for the community center complex may be issued prior to subdivision of the property. Subdivision of the C-N and C-C zoned commercial portions of the annexation area is not required prior to issuance of building permits." IV. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of a modification to the DA as recommended by Staff in Section V. B. The Meridian City Council heard these items on July 28, 2020. At the public hearing.the Council moved to approve the subject MDA request. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Mike Wardle,Brighton Corporation b. In opposition:None c. Commenting: James Phillips d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Request for mixed use development to occur on this site consistent with the MU-N FLUM designation to provided needed services in this area. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. None 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation. a. None V. EXHIBITS A. Development Agreement Provision#5.1 g: Existing: "The annexation area shall be subdivided prior to issuance of any building permits beyond those required for the development of the school,YMCA and park site, a wireless communication facility,the assisted living facility,medical clinic,and the Hill's Century Farm North community center complex on common lot 101 as shown on the revised conceptual development plan dated October 30,2019." Page 2 Item#7. EXHIBIT A Applicant's Proposed Change: "The residential portions of the annexation area shall be subdivided prior to issuance of any building permits beyond those required for the development of commercial uses, including but not limited to , a wireless communication facility,the assisted living facility,mediea ehake, and the Hill's Century Farm North self-service storage facili , and the community center complex on common lot 101 as shown on the revised conceptual development plan dated October 30, 2019." Staffs Recommended Change: "The a4+nexa4ion area shall be s4&vided pr-ior-to issuanee of any building pefmits beyond these, r-e"ir-ed for-the developmen�of the sehool,]VA4GA and park site,a wireless eE)WAffUfiiea4iE)f1 faeility,the assisted living f4eility, medical elinie, and the Hill's Centuff Farm North eonununity Oeteber-30 2019." "The R-8 and R-15 zoned residential portions of the annexation area shall be subdivided prior to issuance of any building permits beyond those required for the community center complex on Lot 101 as shown on the revised conceptual development plan dated October 30,2019;building permit(s)for the community center complex may be issued prior to subdivision of the property. Subdivision of the C-N and C-C zoned commercial portions of the annexation area is not required prior to issuance of building permits." Page 3 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Quartet Northeast (H-2020- 0017) by Brighton Development, Inc., Located at 4020 &4340 N. Black Cat Rd. Item#8. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ... AND DECISION& ORDER , In the Matter of the Request for Annexation of a Total of 68.73 acres of Land with R-8 (48.42 acres) and C-G(20.31 acres) Zoning Districts, and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 137 Buildable Lots (136 Residential and 1 Commercial), 19 Common Lots, and 2 Other Lots on 66.52 acres of Land in the R-8 and C-G Zoning Districts for Quartet Northeast; and Annexation of a Total of 22.26 Acres of Land with an R-8 Zoning District and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 50 Buildable Lots and 10 Common Lots on 19.92 Acres of Land in the R-8 Zoning District for Quartet Southeast by Brighton Development,Inc. Case No(s). H-2020-0017& H-2020-0018 For the City Council Hearing Date of: July 28,2020 (Findings on August 11,2020) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67, Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR QUARTET NORTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0017&QUARTET SOUTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0018 - 1 - Item#8. Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's requests for annexation&zoning and preliminary plat for Quartet Northeast and Quartet Southeast is hereby approved with the requirement of a Development Agreement per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 11- 6B-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR QUARTET NORTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0017&QUARTET SOUTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0018 -2- Item#8. accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52,Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR QUARTET NORTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0017&QUARTET SOUTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0018 -3- Item#8. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 11 th day of August 2020. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED AYE COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED AYE MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 8-11-2020 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR QUARTET NORTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0017&QUARTET SOUTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0018 -4- Item#8. EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT � 1 ��, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 7/28/2020 legend DATE: f ILIProject La -o-Ron TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner i 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: H-2020-0017 Quartet Northeast H-2020-0018 Quartet Southeast LOCATION: 4020&4340 N. Black Cat Rd. [Parcels: #S0434233652; SO434244210; 50434233920; S0434325860 (partial), in the west '/4 of Section 34,TAN.,R.1W.] 1 ' I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Quartet Northeast(NE): Annexation of a total of 68.73 acres of land with R-8 (48.42 acres) and C-G(20.31 acres)zoning districts; and Preliminary Plat consisting of 137 buildable lots(136 residential and 1 commercial), 19 common lots, and 2 other lots on 66.52 acres of land in the R-8 and C-G zoning districts. Quartet Southeast(SE): Annexation of a total of 22.26 acres of land with an R-8 zoning district; and Preliminary plat consisting of 50 buildable lots and 10 common lots on 19.92 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district.Note:A property boundary adjustment application is currently in process with Ada County that will reconfigure the boundary of this property consistent with the Record of Survey(ROS)shown in Section VIII.A; the Applicant anticipates this application will be approved and the ROS recordedprior to the City Council hearing. Therefore, the annexation andplat boundaries are based on the boundary shown on the ROS and not the current parcel configuration shown on the maps included in this report. Because NMID owns the land where the Five Mile Creek is located which lies between the two properties proposed for development and does not wish for their land to be included in the subdivision, two (2)separate preliminary plat applications are required. Because the site is being developed as one overall property, one staff report has been prepared for both projects which includes analysis for each individual plat as well as for the overall development. The overall annexation area includes the Five Mile Creek as zoning goes to the centerline of waterways. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 66.52(NE)+ 19.92(SE)=86.44 acres(overall) Existing/Proposed Zoning RUT in Ada County(existing);R-8 and C-G(proposed) Pagel Item#8. Description Details I Page Future Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential(MDR)(3-8 units/acre)(50+/-acres)&Mixed Use—Non-Residential(MU-NR)(41+/-acres) Existing Land Use(s) Rural residential/agricultural Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family residential(SFR),commercial Lots(#and type;bldg./common) 186 residential buildable lots; 1 commercial buildable lot;29 common lots; and 2 other lots for shared driveways Phasing Plan(#of phases) 3 phases(overall between both subdivision) Number of Residential Units(type 186 detached SFR homes of units) Density(gross&net) NE:2.93 units/acre(gross);4.73 units/acre(net) SE:2.51 units/acre(gross);4.86 units/acre(net) NE&SE(overall): 2.8 units/acre(gross);4.76 units/acre(net) Open Space(acres,total NE: 7.6 acres [%]/buffer/qualified) SE: 3.4 acres NE&SE(overall): 11 acres(or 13%) Amenities Swimming pool,multi-use pathways,an additional 2.36+acres qualified open space beyond the minimum required and a tot lot with children's play equipment. Physical Features(waterways, Land containing the Five Mile Creek bisects the two(2)preliminary plats;a hazards,flood plain,hillside) portion of the site is within the floodplain in an approximate(A)zone. The Creason Lateral runs along the eastern portion of the north boundary of Quartet Northeast subdivision. Neighborhood meeting date;#of 1/21/20;9 attendees attendees: History(previous approvals) None B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Yes • Requires ACHD No Commission Action (yes/no) Traffic Impact Study(yes/no) Yes Access Two(2)accesses(Bell Tower Dr.,a local street&San Remo St.,a collector street) (Arterial/Collectors/State are proposed via N.Black Cat Rd.,an arterial street. Hwy/Local)(Existing and Black Cat Rd.is currently improved with 2-travel lanes and no curb,gutter or Proposed) sidewalk abutting the site.There is 50-70'of ROW for Black Cat Rd. (17-20' from centerline). Traffic Level of Service Better than"D"(Acceptable level of service is"E") Stub (1)collector and(1)local stub street is proposed to the north and(1)local stub Street/Interconnectivity/Cross street is proposed to the south to adjacent properties for future extension as Access depicted on the plat. Existing Road Network There are no existing streets within the site and no stub streets to the site;N.Black Cat Rd. exists along the west boundary of the site Existing Arterial Sidewalks/ There is no existing sidewalk or buffer along N.Black Cat Rd. ' Buffers Page 2 Item#8. Description Details Page Proposed Road Capital ImprGvmne,Ybt PlAn�CIPV hA&gndad Five Ydar Work PI an ffYWP}: Improvements + �M=k Cat Road it Limbed M(ha CIP to ba wiftmd to&Ears ittrm McMIllars Road to Ustick Road between 2021 and 2025 • The intaraectipn of Mcdulilfan Rued and E3iack Cat Rand is listed in the CIP to he eecactatrur;ted as a mulll•tane mundaboul wdh 4-lanes on the rronh leg.4-lanes an the south,2•Ianes oast, and 24anes on the west Eeg,anil nxoorrstruclad between 202B end 2030. The mnE&sacbm of UsLm%Road and Black Cat Road Is Fasted In the C IP to be reconstructed as a dual4ane roundabout with 44anes an the rwrih leg,daanas an the south,44anes east, and 44anes an the west leg.sno reoonslrudad betwftn 2021 ana 2025. A dedicated northbound right-turn lane&dedicated southbound left-turn lane is required to be constructed on Black Cat Rd.at Bell Tower Dr. &San Remo St. as recommended in the TIS. Fire Service • Distance to Fire Station 2 miles • Fire Response Time Falls within 5 minute response time goal - • Resource Reliability 76%-target goal is 80%or greater—does not meet the targeted goal • Risk Identification 2—current resources would not be adequate to supply service to this project • Accessibility Project meets all required access,road widths and turnarounds. • Special/resource needs Project will require an aerial device;response time is 12 minutes travel time- can't meet this need in the required timeframe if a truck company is required. • Water Supply Requires 1,000 gallons per minute for one hour,may be less if buildings are fully sprinklered. • Other Resources Police Service • Distance to Police 6.5 miles Station • Police Response Time Just under 5 minutes from Police Dept.;response time goal for emergencies is 3-5 minutes. • Calls for Service 283 (within a mile of site between 3/l/2019-2/29/2020) MM • Accessibility No concerns • Specialty/resource needs No additional resources are required at this time. • Crimes 28(within a mile of site between 3/l/2019-2/29/2020) • Crashes 19(within a mile of site between 3/l/2019-2/29/2020) • Other The MPD can provide service if this development is approved as they already serve this area. West Ada School District �nrollrrient capml • Distance(elem,ins, oesm.awoo hs) Messent 41ew Elementary Y a 675 9 kbpW • Capacity of Schools Slat Middle Sehool 542 loan 63 • #of Students rferldiep Nigh School a961 7404 4.0 Enrolled Que to the abundant arnoLmt of growth In the area.West Ada Is aetlyely hulldeng new school$,and bpwudaries an always rha+ ft.These hiture studtmu5 could potentially 8.tler4 Owyhee 141�h School, • Estimated#of 110 (NE)+40(SE)= 150 students from this development Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Directly adjacent Services • Sewer Shed North Black Cat Trunk Shed • Estimated Project Sewer See application ERU's Page 3 Item#8. • WRRF Declining 13.92 Balance • Project Consistent with Yes WW Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts/Concerns Applicant to ensure that the depths of the sanitary sewer allows for service of the property to the SE of Quartet Northeast per the Meridian Wastewater Master Plan. Water • Distance to Water Directly adjacent Services • Pressure Zone 1 • Estimated Project Water See application ERU's • Water Quality None • Project Consistent with Yes Water Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns The water main in N.Joy Way(furthest east road)should be a 12-inch.In addition,the water main in N.Joy Way will need to continue south through Quartet Southeast to provide a second connection out to Black Cat Rd.with the second hase of the development. C. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend 0 Legend 0 ��Project Lflcfliior �Wojec#LflcgioPs ii I�e R ria • Page 4 Item#8. Zoning Map Planned Development Map Legend C-00 -Legend -- 0 0 ff ff Proyect Lacainon IetProject Lccasor R- i Ci9y LlrniEs R-1 _ +- I — Planned Parcels R- R-N R- RU T' - R- C: L - R x---- RU R- R9 R'' III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Brighton Development, Inc.—2929 W.Navigator#400,Meridian, ID 83642 B. Owner: Quenzer Farms, LLLP—3680 N. Black Cat Rd.,Meridian,ID 83646 C. Representative: Michael D. Wardle,Brighton Corporation—2929 W.Navigator#400,Meridian,ID 83642 IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Notification published in 5/29/2020 7/10/2020 newspaper Notification mailed to property owners within 300 feet 5/26/2020 7/8/2020 Applicant posted public hearing 4/22/2020 7/15/2020 notice on site Nextdoor posting 5/27/2020 7/8/2020 V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS(Comprehensive Plan) Land Use: The Future Land Use Map(FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan designates the western 50+/-acres of the property as Medium Density Residential(MDR)and the eastern 41+/-acres as Mixed Use— Non-Residential(MU-NR). A City Park is also conceptually designated on the FLUM in this general area. Page 5 Item#8. The MDR designation allows for dwelling units at gross densities of 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The purpose of the MU-NR designation is to designate areas where new residential dwellings will not be permitted, as residential uses are not compatible with the planned and/or existing uses in these areas. For example, MU-NR areas are used near the City's Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility and where there are heavy industrial or other hazardous operations that need to be buffered from residential.Developments are encouraged to be designed similar to the conceptual MU-NR plan depicted in Figure 3E in the Comprehensive Plan(see page 3-18). Transportation: The Master Street Map(MSM) depicts a collector street from W.McMillan Rd.to the project's north boundary near the northeast corner of the site and a multi-lane roundabout at the mid-mile on Black Cat Rd. The Map depicts a future east/west collector street near the half mile on the west side of Black Cat. A collector street(San Remo St./N. Joy Way) is proposed from N. Black Cat Rd. to the north boundary in accord with the MSM. ACHD is not requiring a roundabout be constructed at this time as they feel it's not warranted based on the Traffic Impact Study(TIS) although additional right-of-way(ROW) is required to be dedicated to accommodate the future construction of the multi-lane roundabout. Proposed Development: The Applicant proposes to develop 66.35 acres of the subject overall property with 186 single-family detached dwelling units at an overall gross density of 2.8 units per acre; and 20.09 acres with non-residential/commercial uses to be determined in the future consistent with the FLUM. The eastern 18 acre residential portion of Quartet Northeast is located within the MU-NR designated area,which is a non-residential designated area that provides approximately a'/4 mile separation and buffer to the City's wastewater facility.Because the FLUM is not parcel specific,the Applicant requests the MDR designation on the western portion of the property is extended to the collector street(N.Joy Way), which bisects the eastern portion of the property.The portion of the property east of the collector street is proposed to be zoned C-G and developed with non-residential/commercial uses. Because the collector street will provide a"break"to future non-residential/commercial uses similar to that shown on the concept diagram for MU-NR designated areas included in the Comprehensive Plan (see Figure 3E on pg.3-18), Staff is amenable to this proposal if deemed appropriate by City Council. Staff does have concerns with residential uses in such close proximity to the Wastewater facility as foul odors are a concern in this area,thus the reason for the"non-residential"designation.For this reason, residential may not be a compatible use in this area.City Council should make this determination.Note: The Public Work's Dept. anticipates doing a noise%dor study later this year to determine the current impacts of the facility on adjacent properties, which may change the boundary of the MU-NR designated area. The Park's Dept. is not pursuing a City park in this location at this time; however,the non- residential/commercial lot(Lot 1,Block 14) on the east side of the collector street adjacent to the wastewater facility may be considered for a potential park site with a future development application on that property. Prior to any development occurring on this lot,the Applicant should coordinate with the Park's Department to determine if a City park is needed in this area. The following Comprehensive Plan Policies are applicable to this development: • "Encourage a variety of housing types that meet the needs, preferences, and financial capabilities of Meridian's present and future residents."(2.01.02D) Only one housing type is proposed in this development (i.e. single-family detached). The residential developments in this vicinity also contain standard single-family detached homes. Because this site is in close proximity to the City's Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility, Staff does not recommend a mix of housing types is provided as it would likely increase the density in this area, which is not desired. Page 6 Item#8. • "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and urban services at the time of final approval,and in accord with any adopted levels of service for public facilities and services."(3.03.03F) City water and sewer service is available and can be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. • "Avoid the concentration of any one housing type or lot size in any geographical area;provide for diverse housing types throughout the City."(2.01.01 G) Only one housing type is proposed in this development(i.e. single-family detached); the minimum lot size proposed is 6,866 with an average lot size of 9,145 square feet, which will accommodate a variety of housing styles consisting of I-and 2-story units. • "Encourage compatible uses and site design to minimize conflicts and maximize use of land." (3.07.00) The proposed single-family residential development is compatible with other residential and agricultural uses in the area; the future non-residential/commercial development should be compatible with the existing Wastewater facility to the southeast. The proposed residential uses in the MU-NR designated area may not be compatible with the Wastewater facility. The Public Work's Dept. anticipates doing a noise%dor study later this year to determine the current impacts of the facility on adjacent properties, which may change the boundary of the MU-NR designated area. • "With new subdivision plats,require the design and construction of pathway connections, easy pedestrian and bicycle access to parks, safe routes to schools,and the incorporation of usable open space with quality amenities." (2.02.01A) Segments of the City's multi-use pathway system are proposed off-site along the north boundary of the Five Mile Creek and along the east side of the proposed collector street in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. Detached sidewalks are proposed along the arterial and collector streets for safe pedestrian access. Usable open space and quality amenities are proposed(see detailed analysis below in Section VI.B). • "Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development."(3.03.03A) The proposed development will connect to City water and sewer systems; services are proposed to be provided to and though this development in accord with current City plans. • "Discourage residential land uses in close proximity to the Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility,the Intermountain Gas Facility on Can-Ada Road, and other incompatible land uses." (3.06.02E) The eastern 18 acre portion of the site in Quartet Northeast is within the MU-NR designated area on the FLUM, which is in close proximity to the wastewater facility. The expansion of residential uses in this area may not be compatible with the wastewater facility due to odors associated with the facility. • "Maximize public services by prioritizing infill development of vacant and underdeveloped parcels within the City over parcels on the fringe."(2.02.02) The proposed project is located in part of a larger "enclave"around the City's wastewater facility; development of this property will assist in maximizingpublic services. • "Require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks,water and sewer utilities."(3.03.03G) Page 7 Item#8. Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter and sidewalks is required to be provided with development as proposed. • "Annex lands into the corporate boundaries of the City only when the annexation proposal conforms to the City's vision and the necessary extension of public services and infrastructure is provided." (3.03.03) The proposed development plan is generally consistent with the City's vision in terms that medium density residential and non-residential uses are proposed;public services can be provided and infrastructure will be extended with development. • "Require collectors consistent with the ACHD Master Street Map(MSM), generally at/near the mid- mile location within the Area of City Impact."(6.01.03B) A collector street(San Remo St./N.Joy Way) is proposed from N. Black Cat Rd. that stubs to the north for future extension to McMillan Rd in accord with the MSM, which depicts a collector street from McMillan Rd. to the northeast corner of the proposed residential development. • "Plan for and allow land uses surrounding the Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility that reduce human exposure to odors."(4.10.01A) The residential uses proposed on 18 acres in Quartet Northeast in the MU-NR designated area may expose humans to odors associated with the wastewater facility. • "Coordinate with developers, irrigation districts, and drainage entities to implement the proposed pathway network along canals, ditches, creeks,laterals and sloughs."(3.08.02B) A 10 foot wide multi-use pathway is proposed along the north side of the Five Mile Creek adjacent to the south boundary of the Quartet Northeast preliminary plat on NMID's property. • "Slow the outward progression of the City's limits by discouraging fringe area development; encourage development of vacant or underutilized parcels currently within City limits."(4.05.03B) The proposed project is in a larger enclave area around the City's wastewater facility and is not on the fringe. Staff believes the proposed development plan is generally consistent with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density and transportation if City Council determines an extension of the MDR designation on the abutting 18 acres of land to the east is appropriate for the area currently designated MU- NR. VI. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ANALYSIS UD A. Annexation&Zoning: The Applicant proposes to annex a total of 90.99 acres of land between the two subdivisions with R-8 (70.68 acres)and C-G(20.31 acres) zoning consistent with the associated MDR and MU-NR FLUM designations in the Comprehensive Plan as discussed above in Section V. At the request of the City,the Applicant included the 0.97 acre out-parcel at the southwest corner of the Quartet Northeast subdivision where a sewer lift station is located in the annexation boundary. The single-family residential and future non-residential/commercial uses planned to develop on this site are consistent with uses desired in this area as discussed above in Section V. A conceptual development plan was not submitted for the non-residential/commercial lot proposed to be zoned C-G;the Applicant states this lot will be the subject of future discussion with the City regarding a potential park site as depicted on the FLUM or consideration of other potential buffer uses determined by the results of the Public Work's noise/odor study. Page 8 Item#8. The annexation area is within the Area of City Impact Boundary(AOCI). Legal descriptions for the annexation area are included in Section VIII.B; separate descriptions were submitted for each of the preliminary plat applications. The City may require a development agreement(DA)in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. In order to ensure the site develops as proposed with this application,staff recommends a DA as a provision of annexation with the provisions included in Section IX.The DA is required to be signed by the property owner(s)/developer and returned to the City within 6 months of the Council granting the annexation for approval by City Council and subsequent recordation. The Record of Survey depicted in Section VIII.A should be approved by Ada County and recorded prior to approval of the annexation ordinance and the Development Agreement for this project. Additionally,as a provision of the Development Agreement, Staff recommends the Applicant is required to coordinate with the Park's Dept.prior to development of the C-G zoned portion of the site on the east side of the collector street to determine if a City park is needed in that area. B. Preliminary Plat: Two separate preliminary plats, Quartet Northeast and Quartet Southeast, are proposed due to land owned by NMID containing the Five Mile Creek bisecting the two properties. Because both plats are proposed to develop and be marketed as one overall project, Staffs analysis is based on the overall project. Quartet Northeast consists of 137 buildable lots(136 residential and 1 commercial), 19 common lots,and 2 other lots on 66.52 acres of land in the R-8 and C-G zoning districts; and Quartet Southeast consists of 50 buildable lots and 10 common lots on 19.92 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district. Overall, a total of 186 residential buildable lots, 1 commercial buildable lot,29 common lots and 2 other lots are proposed between the two subdivisions. The minimum lot size proposed overall is 6,866 square feet(s.f.)with an average lot size of 9,145 s.£.;the gross density overall is 2.8 units/acre with a net density of 4.76 units/acre. The subdivision is proposed to develop in three(3)phases as depicted on the plat(see Section VIII.C). The first two phases are located along N. Black Cat Rd.with the third and final phase on the eastern portion of the site. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There is one existing home and accessory structures within the boundary of each preliminary plat that are proposed to remain on Lot 11,Block 7, Quartet Southeast and Lot 2,Block 1, Quartet Northeast subdivision. All existing accessory structures that don't comply with the setback standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 should be removed prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat on the phase in which they're located. The existing homes are required to disconnect from private service and hook up to City water and sewer service within 60 days of such services becoming available as set forth in MCC 9-1-4 and 9-4-8 respectively.Existing wells may be used for irrigation purposes only. The addresses of these homes will also be subject to change with subdivision of the property. Proposed Use Analysis: Single-family detached dwellings are listed as a principal permitted use in the R-8 zoning district per UDC Table 11-2A-2.Allowed uses in the C-G district are listed in UDC Table 11-2B-2. Although some residential uses are allowed in the C-G zoning district per UDC Table 11-2B-2, Staff recommends as a provision of the DA that no residential uses be developed on the non- residential/commercial C-G zoned lot on the east side of the collector street,including but not limited to, a multi-family development, a vertically integrated residential project, and/or a nursing/residential care facility unless a subsequent Noise and Odor Study conducted by the City determines residential uses are appropriate in that area. Page 9 Item#8. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): Development of the subject property is required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district and 11-2B-3 for the C-G district. Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards (UDC 11-6C-3) Development of the subdivision is required to comply with the subdivision design and improvement standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3, including but not limited to streets, common driveways and easements. There are two(2)common driveways proposed on common lots(i.e. Lots 10 and 16,Block 1); such driveways should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. A perpetual ingress/egress easement is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. An exhibit should be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks,fencing, building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via the common driveway; if a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street,the driveway should be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway.Address signage should be provided at the public street for homes accessed via common driveways for emergency wayfinding purposes. Access(UDC 11-3A-3) One(1)collector street(San Remo St./N.Joy Way)access is proposed in Quartet Southeast and one(1) local street access is proposed in Quartet Northeast via N. Black Cat Rd. The collector street is proposed to stub to the north at the northeast corner of the site for future extension to W. McMillan Rd. Local stub streets are proposed to the north and south to adjacent properties for future extension as depicted on the preliminary plats in Section VIII.C. Direct lot access via the arterial(Black Cat Rd.) and collector(San Remo St/N. Joy Way) streets is prohibited; the existing access via Black Cat Rd. for the home proposed to remain on Lot 2,Block 1 Quartet Northeast subdivision shall be removed and access taken from Belltower Dr. The bridge across the Five Mile Creek and the gravel fire access road from Black Cat Rd.in the location where the collector street is proposed is required to be constructed for emergency access for any development over 30 homes/lots as approved by the Fire Department. Because N.Joy Way is proposed to stub at the north boundary and is longer than 150'without a Fire Department approved turn around,the Fire Dept. requests a Type III barricade is placed at the intersection of N.Joy Way and Grand Rapids Dr.to prevent access until the street is extended in the future.The construction drawings should be revised to include this change.As an alternative to a barricade, a Fire Dept. approved turnaround could be provided at the end of the collector street. Parking(UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family detached dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. Future development should comply with these standards. Parking for non-residential uses is required per the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-6B.1. Pathways(UDC 11-3A-8): The Pathways Master Plan depicts a segment of the City's multi-use pathway system along the north side of the Five Mile Creek; and along the north and a short portion of the east side of the Quartet Northeast property. The Applicant proposes to construct an off-site 10-foot wide multi-use pathway along the north side of the Five Mile Creek and a detached 10-foot wide sidewalk/multi-use pathway along the east side of the collector street(N. Joy Way),north of the creek,to the north boundary of Quartet Northeast per discussions with the Park's Department. Legal descriptions for the pathway alignments (14-feet wide) Page 10 Item#8. should be submitted to the City in order for the pathways to be added to the City's Master Pathways Agreement. The pathway proposed on NMID's property will require a license agreement with NMID for the pathway and associated landscaping required by UDC 11-311-12C. The UDC (11-3B-12C) requires a 5-foot wide landscape strip to be provided along each side of the pathway,landscaped with a mix of trees,shrubs,lawn, and/or other vegetative groundcover.A minimum of one trees is required per 100 linear feet of pathway; the calculations table included on the landscape plan does not include the linear feet of pathways or trees proposed to demonstrate compliance with this requirement—the revised plan submitted with the final plat application should include this information. If NMID does not approve the pathway and associated landscaping to be located on their property, the pathway should be provided in a minimum 20-foot wide common lot within Quartet Northeast subdivision within a 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement. Staff recommends pedestrian pathways are provided from the internal sidewalks along Miramente Ct. and Miramente Dr.through adjacent common areas to the multi-use pathway along the Five Mile Creek; and micro-pathways are provided through Lot 10,Block 4 and Lot 7,Block 3 for pedestrian interconnectivity within the subdivision. All pathways shall be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8 and the Pathways Master Plan. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-1 The UDC(11-3A-17)requires, at a minimum, detached sidewalks to be provided along arterial and collector streets and attached sidewalk to be provided along local streets. Detached sidewalks are proposed along all internal streets,except around the cul-de-sacs, and within the street buffer adjacent to N. Black Cat Rd. and San Remo St./N. Joy Way in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-1 Eight-foot wide parkways are proposed adjacent to all streets where detached sidewalk are proposed; all parkways are required to be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): A 25-foot wide street buffer is required adjacent to N.Black Cat Rd., an arterial street; and a 20-foot wide street buffer is required adjacent to San Remo St./N. Joy Way, a collector street, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C, as proposed. Parkways are required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17 and 11-3B- 7C. Landscaping is proposed in accord with UDC standards. Landscaping is required along all pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C as discussed above. Common open space is required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3E. Landscaping is depicted in common areas in excess of UDC standards. There are existing trees on the site around the existing homes that are proposed to be retained that may require mitigation if removed. The Applicant should coordinate with Matt Perkins,the City Arborist,to determine mitigation requirements per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-10C.5 if existing trees are not proposed to be retained on the site.Any mitigation information shall be included in the calculations table on the landscape plan. Page 11 Item#8. If the unimproved right-of-way is 10 feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line,the Developer is required to maintain a 10 foot compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of ACHD and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.5.A license agreement for improvements within the right-of-way is required between the property owner and ACHD. Qualified Open Space(UDC 11-3 : A minimum of 10%qualified open space meeting the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B is required to be provided with development. Based on the area of the Quartet Northeast plat(66.52 acres),a minimum of 6.65 acres of qualified open space should be provided.A total of 7.6 acres(or 11.5%)is proposed in excess of UDC standards consisting of half the street buffer along the arterial street(N. Black Cat Rd.), all of the street buffer along the collector street(N. Joy Way), internal linear open space and common areas exceeding 50' x 100' in area. Based on the area of the Quartet Southeast plat(19.92 acres),a minimum of 1.99 acres of qualified open space should be provided. A total of 3.4 acres(or 17%) is proposed in excess of UDC standards consisting of half the street buffer along the arterial street(N. Black Cat Rd.), all of the street buffer along the collector street(San Remo St./N. Joy Way), and internal linear open space. Qualified Site Amenities (UDC 11-3 A minimum of one(1) qualified site amenity is required for each 20 acres of land to be developed as set forth in UDC 11-3G-3. Based on the area of the Quartet Northeast plat(66.52 acres),a minimum of three(3) qualified site amenities are required to be provided. A community swimming pool, a tot lot containing children's play equipment, one acre of extra qualified open space beyond the minimum standards and segments of the City's multi-use pathway system are proposed in excess of UDC standards. Based on the area of the Quartet Southeast plat(19.92 acres),a minimum of one(1) qualified site amenity is required to be provided. An additional 1.41 acres of qualified open space beyond the minimum standards is proposed as a site amenity in accord with UDC standards. Because Quartet Northeast and Southeast subdivisions will develop as one and be under the same Homeowner's Association, and common open space and site amenities will be shared, Staff believes the proposed open space and site amenities are adequate for the development with the inclusion of the micropath connections as recommended above. Waterways(UDC 11-3A-'U"I: The Creason Lateral runs across the eastern portion of the north boundary of Quartet Northeast subdivision in Lot 34,Block 4 within a 40-foot wide easement and is proposed to be left open. Because this area is included in the qualified open space calculations for the site,it should be landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3E—no landscaping is depicted on the landscape plan for that area. The Five Mile Creek is contained within land owned by NMID that lies between the two proposed preliminary plats. The creek should be protected during construction. A portion of the site is within the Five Mile Creek floodplain in an approximate(A)zone which will require a floodplain permit application,including hydraulic and hydrologic analysis to define base flood elevations and a floodway prior to any development occurring in the overlay district—contact Jason Korn,Public Work's,with any questions. Fencing(UDC 11-3A- : All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6C and 11-3A-7. Fencing is proposed as shown on the landscape plan. Page 12 Item#8. Six-foot tall solid wood fencing is proposed along the perimeter boundary of the site and along side yards adjacent to the street; and 5-foot tall clear vision fence is proposed adjacent to most internal common open space areas. To provide more visibility of the common area on Lot 34,Block 4 where the Creason Lateral is located, Staff recommends fencing adjacent to the common lot complies with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7A.7. The Creason Lateral is required to be fenced with an open vision fence at least 6' in height and having an 11-gauge,2"mesh or other construction,equivalent in ability to deter access to the waterway.If the Applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director that the waterway serves as or will be improved as a part of the development to be a water amenity as defined in UDC 11-1A-1,it is not required to be fenced per UDC 11-3A-6C.If it's improved as a water amenity, construction drawings and relevant calculations prepared by a qualified licensed professional registered in the State of Idaho shall be submitted to both the Director and the authorized representative of the water facility for approval. Staff recommends a break in the fence is provided on the south side of Lot 8,Block 6 adjacent to the Five Mile Creek for pedestrian access to the multi-use pathway. Storm Drainage: An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction is required to follow Best Management Practice as adopted by the City. Irrigation: Underground,pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided for each and every lot within the development in accord with MCC 9-1,Water Use and Service. Irrigation water will be provided from the Nampa&Meridian Irrigation District. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): The Applicant submitted several conceptual building elevations for the proposed single-family detached homes planned to be constructed in this development which are included in Section VIII.F. Homes depicted are a mix of 1-and 2-story units with building materials consisting of a variety of siding styles with stone/brick veneer accents.No elevations were submitted for the non-residential/commercial portion of the development as no development is proposed at this time. Because 2-story home elevations that face arterial and collector streets are highly visible, Staff recommends as a provision of the DA that the rear and/or side of structures on lots that face N. Black Cat Rd.,an arterial street, and San Remo St./N.Joy Way,a collector street,incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types,or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted and approved prior to submittal of any building permit applications for the swimming pool facility and the non- residential/commercial portion of the development. Design of these structures is required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual.Design review is not required for single- family detached homes. VII. DECISION A. Staff: If the City Council determines extending the MDR FLUM designation further to the east as proposed is appropriate, Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation and zoning with the requirement of a Page 13 Item#8. Development Agreement and approval of the requested preliminary plats with the conditions noted in Section IX.A per the Findings in Section X. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on June 18,2020. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing a. In favor: Mike Wardle,Brighton Corp. (Applicant's Representative),Jon Wardle, Brighton Corp_ b. In opposition: None c. Commenting:None d. Written testimony: Carrie Hovey e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen £ Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s) public testimony a. Concern pertaining to traffic &safety of existing 2-lane roadways and the amount of development occurring in this area which is worsening the situation and impact of more development on area schools—would like these applications to be rejected or at least postponed until road infrastructure and schools can be prepared to handle the additional impacts. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. Concerns pertaining to growth and traffic and the adequacy of existing infrastructure to handle more development until improvements are made in this area; IL. The option of requiring the noise/odor study to be complete prior to development of Phase 3 to determine if residential uses are appropriate in the area current MU-NR designated area. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Modification to condition#B 1.2 to require the water main in N.Joy Way to continue south through Quartet SE to provide a 2nd connection out to Black Cat Rd. with the 2nd phase of development, instead of the 1 st phase, as recommended b, Staff. 5. Outstanding issue(s)for City Council: a. None C. The Meridian Citv Council heard these items on July 28,2020.At the public hearing,the Council moved to approve the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Mike Wardle and Jon Wardle,Brighton Corn. b. In opposition: None C. Commenting: Denise LaFever d. Written testimony: Mike Wardle,Brighton Corp. (in agreement with the Commission's recommendation) e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen £ Other Staff commenting on application: Dale Bolthouse, Clint Dolsbv_ 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Opinion that it's not appropriate to approve C-G zoning without a development plan. b. Testimony from Dale Bolthouse that only 4 complaints have been received in the last 5 ears from downwind residents pertaining to an offensive odor generated from the wastewater treatment facility. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Council requested more information from Public Works in regard to the upcoming odor stud Page 14 Item#8. b. Concern pertaining to approval of residential uses in the MU-NR designated portion of Phase 3 prior to obtaining results from an updated odor study to determine if residential uses are appropriate in that area: c. Possible condition on Phase 3 and the commercial portion of the development to ensure City has the ability to restrict residential uses and possibly other uses in the MU-NR designated area if the odor study reflects a significant impact on this area: d. Concern of allowing C-G zoning without a conceptual development plan showin how the lot is to be developed. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. An odor study is required to be conducted by the City prior to development of Phase 3 to determine if residential uses are appropriate in the MU-NR designated area: if determined to not be appropriate,a modification to the DA shall be required to amend the development plan for that area(see new DA provision A.lil: a. Modify DA provision#A.1 f to require the DA to be modified to include a conceptual development plan for the C-G zoned area/lot prior to development. Page 15 Item#8. VIII. EXHIBITS A. Record of Survey for Property Boundary Adjustment in Ada County(Approved/Recorded) h � � 3 I z 5 Fr is -j41 1 LW F Etc FYe F I JhF ki s � x- . , Page 16 Item#8. B. Annexation Legal Description & Exhibit Map Quartet Northeast: lum 9233 WEST STATE STREET I SOISE,ID 83714 1 209.639.6939 1 FAX 208.639.6930 Aprrl 10,2020 Project No.19-010 Exhibit A legal Dewription for Annexation Quartet Northeast A parcel of land situated in a portion of the South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 34,Township 4 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as Follows: Commencing at a brass cap marking the Northwest corner of said Section 34,which bears NOU'27'24"F a distance of 2,631.60 feet from an aluminum cap marking the West 1/4 corner of said Section 34,thence fallowing the westerly line of said Northwest 1/4,S00 27'24W a distance of 1,315.80 feet to the North 1/16 corner of said Section 34 and'section 33 and being the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence leaving said westerly line and following the northerly line of said South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4,589'26'06"E a distance of 2,647.62 feet to an aluminum cap marking the Northeast corner of said South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4(C-N 1/16 corner); Thence leaving said northerly line and following the easterly line of Said South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4, 500°43'47"W a distance of 1,323.39 feet to a 518-inch rebar marking the center of said Section 34; Thence leaving said easterly line and following the southerly line of said Northwest 1/4,N89'16'14"W a distance of 1,129.66 feet to the centerline of Five Mile Drain; Thence leaving said southerly line and following said centerline the fallowing eight (9)courses: 1. N38'17'55"W a distance of 133.84 feet; 2. N46'51'55"W a distance of 134.69 feet; 3. N73'28'41"W a distance of 107.91 feet; 4. N79'57'01"W a distance of 202.45 feet; 5. N77'05'23"W a distance of 11210 feet; 6. N79'05'40'W a distance of 325.25 feet; 7 N78'22'23"W a distance of 307.52 feet; 8. N78'15'35"W a distance of 100.49 feet; Thence leaving said centerline.N00°27'24"E a distance of 236.72 feet, Thence N89'32'3VW a distance of 195.00 feet to the westerly line of said Northwest 1/4; Thence following said westerly line,N00'27'24"E a distance of 654.43 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 69,735 acres,more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and bVthis reference is hereby made a part of. *y* a ', 1459 0 IV. OF % dq to•1z2-D ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS I PIANNFRS Page 17 Item#8. 0 oa r- cc N Li m m d L EMINDW .M {OR O 0 6 Cn �� fu a m ko b� U Q] p� d 55RQ �n j U r� ss V as �¢ ii 2 m y w O 'a � o � U O •N Q N ,ze•cvsa �.ao.az.aes •5 � m } Ln � n uryi n ? {] x a w C7 Ln-44 m o pp e K a m ' m m O ti O O 2 w7{ Qr La.. Zrl " uj �� In F O ' u m m r d O N H r � 144eeJJ11rn .0 2 Ui IM1 w M] Q O Z a V F- O �QQy fQV tb 7 M in m N 0 f+7 N 7 YQl [) 73 U m+� N 40 6 ci N-ICI CCC �N V 6! p Y7 U Q V7 C V] xn 8 EA N u�'yv a ;g =° axi o c z w rW r m w 38R U w N LU Page 18 Item#8. Quartet Southeast: Ion 9233 WEST STATE STREE-T I BOISE,1D 83714 1 208-639.6939 1 FAX 2t18.639.6930 April 10,2020 Project No.19-010 Exhibit A Legal Description for Annexation and Rezone to R-8 Quartet Southeast A parcel of land situated in a portion of the North 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 and a portion of the South 1/2 of the!Northwest 1/4 all in Section 34,Township 4 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an aluminum cap marking the West 1/4 corner of said Section 34,which bears 500°27'24"W a distance of 2,631.60 feet from a brass rap marking the Northwest corner of said Section 34,thence following the westerly line of said Northwest 1/4,N00°27'24"E a distance of 450,24 feet to the centerline of Five M ile ❑rain; Thence leaving said westerly line and following said centerline the following nine(9)courses: 1. S83°53'03"E a distance of 33.19 feet; 2. 578°15'35"E a distance of 265.65 feet; 3. S78°22'23"E a distance of 307.52 feet; 4. 579°05'40"E a distance of 326.25 feet; 5. 577°05'23"E a distance of 112.20 feet; 6. 579°57'01"E a distance of 202.45 feet; 7. 573'28'41"E a distance of 107.81 feet; 3. 546°51'55"E a distance of 134.69 feet; 9. 538'17'55"E a distance of 133.84 feet to the southerly line of said Northwest 1/4; Thence leaving said centerline and following said southerly line,N89"16'14"W a distance of 191-01 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Northeast corner of said West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4(C-W 1/16 corner}; Thence leaving said southerly line and`ollowing the easterly line of said West 112 of the Southwest 114, $00°35'24"W a distance of 25.93 feet; Thence leaving said easterly line,60,97 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 517.00 feet,a delta angle of 06°45'23",a chord bearing of 547'09'17"W and a chord distance of 60.93 feet; Thence S43'46'36"W a distance of 306.45 feet; Thence 423.64 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right,said curve haying a radius of 520.00 feet,a delta angle of 46"40'43",a chord bearing of 567"06'57"W and a chord distance of 412-02 feet; Thence N89°32'41"W a distance of 589.03 feet; Thence 545°27'19"W a distance of 29A9 feet; Thence 500°27'12"W a distance of 79.36 feet; Thence N89"32'48"W a distance of 78.00 feet to the westerly line of said Southwest 1/4; Thence following said westerly line,N00'27'12"E a distance of 560.22 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 22.26 acres,more or less. 94 Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is hereby made a part of. R' o 1245►9 o If OF L. a ENGINEERS 4 SURVEYORS I PLANNERS /0'?-02-0 Page 19 Item#8. 28 2-j W. McMillan Rd. 33 34 FOUND BRASS CAP NORTHWEST CORNER SEC-11ON 34 0 125 250 500 N Scale: 1"=25Q' Unplatted SOT53'03"E " 33.19' — S78'15'35"E 265.65' 578'22'23"E 307.52' S7705'40"E w � ! � 32$.25' S77'05'23"E x fi 11 112.20 S79'57'01'E q Mil ntFlIf1E Dr 202.45' z a117 S73328'41'E M 107.81` S46.51'55"E SE-43423392 U \134.69' POINT OF BEGINNING 53$17'55"E FOUND ALUMINUM CAP 133.54' 33 wEST ir4 CORNER SECTION 34 SOO'35'24"W 34 25.93' — Annexation Area. 22.26±AC. Ca N89'18'14 W Current Zoning: RUT 191,01' Proposed Zoning: R-8 ` C--w 1/16 SO434325860(Portion'I &SO434234020(portion) SEC TON 34 ryro to m"U o f `1 S4527'19W p"I m 29.19, IUnplatted a rn r m N5732'41"W 589.03' G z s00'27'12"W 79,36' 7500' 48'1hf Unplatted FOUND ALUMINUM CAP SW CORNER SECTION 34 33 34 T.4N., R.1W.W, McMillan Rd. T.3N., R.JW. — — �pl. LANq LEGEND '�� is FOUND BRASS CAP ; FOUND ALUMINUM CAP 12459 '0 5/8—INCH REBARkin A CALCULATED POINT --jr� �T£ or y4P 4a ANNEXATION & REZONE 6OUNDARY 'P4q► B A� ENGFNEERS.SURVEYORS.PLANNERS — —SECTION LINE • h, 7,0 9233 WEST STATE STRE ET NOISE.IDARO83714 YFFF]!LE(209)639 E939 FAX Ims)639-6936 Exhibit B Annexation and Rezone FATE' ApriF2020 PROJECT- 19-014 SHEET: Quartet Southeast Subdivision 1 OF 1 N1/2 W1/2 SW1/4 &51/2 NW1/4 Sec. 34, T4N, R1W, B.M., Ada County, ID Page 20 Item#8. City Lift Station Lot: lam 9233 WEST STATE STREET I BOISE,ID 83714 1 208.639,6939 I FAX 20U39.6930 April 20,2020 Project No.19-010 Exhibit A Legal Description for Annexation and Rezone to R-8 City of Meridian Parcel A parcel of land situated in a portion of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 all in Section 34, Township 4 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a brass cap marking the northwest corner of said Section 34,which bears NOO'27'24"E a distance of 2,631.60 feet from an aluminum cap marking the west 1/4 of said Section 34,thence following the westerly line of said Northwest 1/4,SOO'27'24"W a distance of 1,980.23 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence leaving said westerly line,S89'32'36"E a distance of 195.00 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence 500'27'24"W a distance of 236.72 feet to centerline of Five mile Drain; Thence following said centerline, N78'15'35"W a distance of 165.16 feet; Thence following said centerline, N83°53'03"W a distance of 33.19 feet to the westerly line of said Northwest 114; Thence leaving said centerline and following said westerly line, N00°27'24"E a distance of 201.13 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 0.974 acres,more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is hereby made a part of. T 12459 Q L, BALti'� ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS I PLANNERS Page 21 Item#8. 28 27 W. McMillan Rd. 33 34 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT N FOUND BRASS CAP NW CORNER SECT]ICN 34 I� M 0 ro I 0 56 100 200 I� N N Scale: 1"=100' b 0 POINT OF BEGINNING S89'32'36"E 195.Ofl' Z LEGEND j" FOUND BRASS CAP FOUND ALUMINUM CAP o `' ��a• S/B-INCH REBAR N x�Yr �3N 3�b`PgC ISM Ct A CALCULATED POINT $ N BQUNNDG4ATRIY & REZONE N��r5'3s N83'53'03"W 76�FFjve 33.19' Mile [tall? Uf U N y,4 Gl LAft S x � o 12459 33 34 ��qTf tg4 O1�k CORNER SECTION 34 ALUMINUM � ��OF 1�19 ENGINEERS.SUAVEVORS.PU4NNER5 NEST �"� .�� 9233 5NE5T STATE 51REET B44E,Inn HO 33714 PHONE P03)639-693R FAX JMS)639-69-M Exhibit B Annexation and Rezone to R-8 DATE: Apr'12000 PROJECT: 19-0M SHEET: City of Meridian Parcel -4130 N. Black Cat Rd. 1 OF 1 5W 1/4 NW 1/4 Sec. 34, T4N., R1W., B.M.,Ada County, Idaho Page 22 Item#8. C. Preliminary Plat(date: 1/31/2020)&Phasing Plan Quartet Northeast: QUARTET HORTHEMTSU&91Va94H PRE UMIrmuPLAT 1 h I1+dA{14411h4151RLL7F0IL THk 5SH 11H lf144 CHI wQrl7rrM'jT 111[II:IlCN somwHr,1 wffrK m*r.1 lw[Lr im Dr L■■O AN.JLh mu".EAAD e_..rh�u M Y 4 • ■ ■ .. r ■ r I'. x41 a ad.a witi"f� FF V ■ 1{ R A P s n x 'r Y -� IRA a ki I ' S o_w[[rr w.lrtwnx.e=nlr'it .. Page 23 A JL_lL A .2 A M I A I A A PW.PW4 A 4L w i YA a.M�Im 40 WIRV A IL kmvW A I A & L' 2. A A A t WA 7 7 t T $. 9p. of A 4p A A IF- 44. Page 24 Item#8. ii i r I r dp ee •f m nurwr.Tlrarr.�,ra5y�r.�un. Quartet Southeast: QUARTf7$0�]T PAST$4JHINVISIONPR9�1MiNARYPLA7 x{wnL tIP.WG YNMlra lx A h3lgMe,a Trlk Yxnn Ej2 or tmE pw3k!hmlST V4 I 4ND PMTIDM OF THE WEST W Ex THE 93UNWESl 1A Cry UCrK 43t 1OWN NIFi II OWN.IVIR I MIS.On O 46ILRI UM,ADA WIJNIV.VANa f�MlTFT�rJf.{,{$!SI:TQIN[Yfl al • Page 25 Item#8. 1 rSii I gwrnTs<zmruTw�or.,�al - 13L MS 41 i im � --r " Y �w,eiiOurxEulwedwHOM Page 26 Phasing Plan: L T$ 1 2. s 41 M7 -T7 IL t- I, AN- JL gi i IL IL T _7' Rt ff.sV IL JL IL 2L IL L Page 27 Item#8. D. Landscape Plan(date: 1/30/2020) Quartet Northeast: .S MPG � I .� �11#9RIILLLL 6111 i I 4 m LD Met MIA ARM d Ff]SfS�F R AN Page 28 Item#8. I i .:i i') �;��.�. .•sue .... I _ y . • V Mann. •ri++ f+ ' I I O K ...... I'r :::.....ti......i... +F f - I _ ]u W'RI NGF IIi[Wl Y..8Wh51G4 t� w� TALL- Quartet Southeast: I I I' I Bkl(;HTON Page 29 Item#8. 7I i . _ .. r V'�.•" rmxaa uw we { mywjhr z sx � - .,*m3 a1.111r-- •--— —.. .�i: ia�k.�t- .a a s�zc�,•aJ� itr' - '- �� .�—_ _., w.4�•�ayM—� Y•- g;w—� RUu7F'r SJlRxE+ff i4lCnMUY rr icrauSLaP sff ,W .+� _ , IX — �.• Pf41E *•�x�7 , -=MM awamioUTKEP r nmrw,oN Page 30 Item#8. E. Qualified Open Space Exhibit(dated: 6/11/2020) Quartet Northeast: ` auAkrFrNORr} �srsueon+dslQfeoviEhlSFACEEXMIW � f � ti= Quartet Southeast: "RTET SOME AST SUM V1610r1 OPEN SPACE MOM AU .Lr�� uwrn x+��xa z I MOF Page 31 �vw�rF.r�l,�n �lo�r s _ r hi it �r Ad y ` . - .+..mow.•f. "ff --- - ~' AL ', 13 P,I G HTOIN 4. TTTICA1.2LSVATTG01-;i r■3 Min - 1 11��ryA�fee"" 3 y d. F� Ii u 11 uulb . f RICiHTON B1 1GHTON " '' Item#8. IX. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. A Development Agreement(DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s)at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The Record of Survey depicted in Section A1111.A shall be ftpffoved by Ada County and meor-ded pr4or to City Couneil appFoval of the Annexation Or-dinanee and Development Agreement for- The DA shall,at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat, phasing plan, landscape plan, qualified open space exhibit and conceptual building elevations included in Section VIII and the provisions contained herein. b. The existing homes that are to be retained on lots in the proposed subdivision are required to disconnect from private systems and hook up to City water and sewer service within 60 days of such services becoming available as set forth in MCC 9-1-4 and 9-4-8 respectively. Existing wells may be used for irrigation purposes only. c. The existing homes to be retained on lots in the proposed subdivision will be assigned new addresses with subdivision of the property. d. The Five Mile Creek shall be protected during construction. e. No residential uses shall be developed on the non-residential/commercial C-G zoned lot on the east side of the collector street(depicted as Lot 1,Block 14 on the preliminary lat ,including but not limited to, a multi-family development, a vertically integrated residential project, and/or a nursing/residential care facility unless a subsequent Noise and Odor Study conducted by the City determines residential uses are appropriate in that area. f. The Developer shall coordinate with the City Park's Department prior to development of the non-residential/commercial lot(depicted as Lot 1,Block 14 on the preliminary platl on the east side of the collector street(N.Joy Way) to determine if a City Park is needed in this area as designated on the Comprehensive Plan. The Development Agreement shall be amended to include a conceptual development plan for that area prior to any_ development occurring on that lot. g. The rear and/or side of structures on lots that face N. Black Cat Rd., an arterial street, and San Remo St./N.Joy Way, a collector street, shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays, banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. h. Quartet Northeast and Southeast subdivisions shall develop and be phased as one project and shall be included in the same Homeowner's Association; all common open space and site amenities between the two subdivisions shall be shared. i. An odor study shall be conducted by the City prior to development of Phase 3 to determine if residential uses are appropriate in the MU-NR designated area: if determined to not be appropriate. Page 33 Item#8. a modification to the Development Agreement shall be required to amend the development plan for that area. 2. The final plat(s) submitted for this development shall incorporate the following: a. Include a note stating direct lot access via N. Black Cat Rd. and San Remo St./N. Joy Way is prohibited. 3. The landscape plan submitted with the final plat application shall be revised as follows: a. Add pedestrian pathways from the internal sidewalks along Miramente Ct. and Miramente Dr. through adjacent common areas to the multi-use pathway along the Five Mile Creek;provide breaks in the fence where necessary to provide a connection. Also provide micro-path connections through Lot 10,Block 4 and Lot 7,Block 3 for pedestrian interconnectivity within the subdivision. b. Landscaping shall be depicted on either side of all pathways as set forth in UDC 11-3B-12C. Calculations shall be included for the linear feet of pathway and the required vs. provided number of trees in the Calculations table. c. If any existing trees are proposed to be removed from the site,the Applicant shall schedule an inspection with the City Arborist,Matt Perkins,prior to removal of any such trees to determine mitigation requirements in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-1OC.5. Mitigation information shall be included in the calculations table on the plan if applicable. d. If the unimproved right-of-way is 10 feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line,the Developer is required to maintain a 10 foot compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of ACHD and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.5. A license agreement for improvements within the right-of-way is required between the property owner and ACHD. e. Depict fencing adjacent to the Creason Lateral as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6C.3 in order to preserve public safety unless the waterway is proposed to be improved as part of the development to be a water amenity. In such case, documentation shall be submitted as set forth in UDC 11-1A-1 and 11-3A-6C.2 for approval by the Director. £ The location of site amenities shall be depicted on the plan; a detail shall be submitted for the children's play equipment. g. Depict landscaping in Lot 34,Block 4 in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3E. h. Depict fencing on Lot 34,Block 4 where the Creason Lateral is located per the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7A.7 to provide more visibility of the common area. i. Depict a 6-foot tall open vision fence having an 11-gauge, 2 inch mesh or other construction equivalent in ability to deter access to the Creason Lateral on Lot 34,Block 4 in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6C.3 unless the waterway is proposed to be improved as part of the development to be a water amenity. In such case, construction drawings and relevant calculations prepared by a qualified licensed professional registered in the State of Idaho shall be submitted to both the Director and the authorized representative of the water facility for approval. 4. Future development shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-6 and 11-2B-3 for the R-8 and C-G zoning districts respectively. 5. The bridge across the Five Mile Creek and the gravel fire access road from Black Cat Rd. in the location where the collector street is proposed shall be constructed for emergency access for any development over 30 homes/lots as approved by the Fire Department. 6. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 Page 34 Item#8. based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 7. An exhibit shall be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks, fencing,building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via common driveways; if a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street,the driveway shall be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D. 8. Address signage shall be provided at the public street for homes accessed via common driveways for emergency wayfinding purposes. 9. A perpetual ingress/egress easement shall be filed with the Ada County Recorder for the common driveways,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D.8. A copy of said easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division with the final plat for City Engineer signature; or,this information may be included on the face of the plat. 10. A Type III barricade shall be placed at the intersection of N. Joy Way and Grand Rapids Dr. to prevent access until the street is extended in the future;the construction drawings shall be revised to include this change. As an alternative to a barricade, a Fire Dept. approved turnaround could be provided at the end of the collector street instead. 11. All existing structures that don't comply with the setback standards listed in UDC 11-2A-6 shall be removed from the site prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer for the phase in which they are located. 12. A 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division for the 10-foot wide multi-use pathways proposed within the site that are not located within right-of-way,prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 13. The existing access via Black Cat Rd. for the home proposed to remain on Lot 2,Block 1, Quartet Northeast subdivision shall be removed. 14. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted and approved prior to submittal of any building permit applications for the swimming pool facility in the residential portion of the development; and for all non-residential/commercial uses. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 Applicant to ensure that the depths of the sanitary sewer allows for service of the property to the SE of Quartet Northeast per the Meridian Wastewater Master Plan. 1.2 The water main in N Joy Way(furthest east road) should be a 12-inch. Also,the water main in N Joy Way will need to continue south through Quartet Southeast to provide a second connection out to Black Cat Road with the fit second phase of the development. 1.3 Consider eliminating the short dead-end water main in the cul-de-sac off of Exeter Avenue and Capriana Drive, instead install three services to the three cul-de-sac homes off the mainline in Capriana Drive. 1.4 From the preliminary investigation of groundwater elevation provided in the application, it appears that shallow groundwater may be a factor with the development of this subdivision. Additional monitoring and analysis shall be required to ensure that homes constructed within this development do not encounter groundwater within their crawl spaces. Updated data and recommendations from a geotechnical professional shall be required with the submittal of construction design drawings. Page 35 Item#8. 1.5 A portion of this project lies within the Meridian Floodplain Overlay District. Prior to any development occurring in the Overlay District,a floodplain permit application,including hydraulic and hydrologic analysis is required to be completed and submitted to the City and approved by the Floodplain Administrator per MCC 10-6. 2. General Conditions of Approval—Quartet Northeast& Quartet Southeast 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet,if cover from top of pipe to sub- grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x 11"map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B)for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals,or drains, exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)898- 5500 for inspections of disconnection of services.Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at(208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. Page 36 Item#8. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C- 3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting.A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public works.aspx?id=272. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond.Applicant must Page 37 Item#8. file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT Northeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=187210&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity Southeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=187211&dbid=0&repo=Meridian City Phasing: https:llweblink.meridianciU.oLglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=187133&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiU D. POLICE DEPARTMENT https:llweblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=187674&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity E. PARK'S DEPARTMENT Northeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=190216&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCitX Southeast: No comments were submitted F. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO(COMPASS) Northeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=188456&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity Southeast: https:llweblink.meridianciU.org/WebLinklDocView.aspx?id=188457&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity G. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.asp x?id=1891 73&dbid=0&r0o=Meridian City H. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT(NMID) Northeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=188676&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity Southeast: https:llweblink.meridianciU.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=188675&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCitE I. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT Northeast: https:llweblink.meridiancitE.oL-glWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=187426&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity Southeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.oLvlWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=187427&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiiy J. IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT(ITD) Northeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.org WWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=189529&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiiy Southeast: Page 38 Item#8. https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=189614&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity K. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) Northeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.org/WebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=187575&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiu Southeast: https:llweblink.meridianciU.oLvlWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=187574&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiu X. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-513-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment to R-8& C-G and proposed development is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is appropriate with an extension of the MDR FL UM land use designation to the collector street as proposed if the Applicant complies with the provisions in Section IX. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the proposed single-family detached homes will contribute to the range of housing opportunities in the City. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment will not result in an adverse impact on the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The City Council finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City if the property is developed in accord with the provisions in Section IX. B. Preliminary Plat Findings: In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; The City Councilfinds that theproposedplat, with the Commission's recommendations, is in substantial compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density, transportation, and pedestrian connectivity. (Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies in, Section V of this report for more information) Page 39 Item#8. 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds that public services will be provided to the subject property with development. (See Exhibit B of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers) 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the development at their own cost, the City Council finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development based upon comments from the public service providers (i.e., Police, Fire, ACHD, etc). (See Section Mfor more information) 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health,safety or general welfare; and, The City Council is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated with the platting of this property. ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The City Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that exist on this site that require preserving. Page 40 7/tem 77 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Quartet Southeast (H-2020- 0018) by Brighton Development, Inc., Located at 4020 and 4340 N. Black Cat Rd. Item#9. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ... AND DECISION& ORDER , In the Matter of the Request for Annexation of a Total of 68.73 acres of Land with R-8 (48.42 acres) and C-G(20.31 acres) Zoning Districts, and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 137 Buildable Lots (136 Residential and 1 Commercial), 19 Common Lots, and 2 Other Lots on 66.52 acres of Land in the R-8 and C-G Zoning Districts for Quartet Northeast; and Annexation of a Total of 22.26 Acres of Land with an R-8 Zoning District and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 50 Buildable Lots and 10 Common Lots on 19.92 Acres of Land in the R-8 Zoning District for Quartet Southeast by Brighton Development,Inc. Case No(s). H-2020-0017& H-2020-0018 For the City Council Hearing Date of: July 28,2020 (Findings on August 11,2020) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28, 2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67, Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR QUARTET NORTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0017&QUARTET SOUTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0018 - 1 - Item#9. Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's requests for annexation&zoning and preliminary plat for Quartet Northeast and Quartet Southeast is hereby approved with the requirement of a Development Agreement per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 11- 6B-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR QUARTET NORTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0017&QUARTET SOUTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0018 -2- Item#9. accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52,Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of July 28,2020 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR QUARTET NORTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0017&QUARTET SOUTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0018 -3- Item#9. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 1 lth day of August 2020. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED AYE COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED AYE MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 8-11-2020 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR QUARTET NORTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0017&QUARTET SOUTHEAST—AZ,PP H-2020-0018 -4- Item#9. EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT � 1 ��, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 7/28/2020 legend DATE: f ILIProject La -o-Ron TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner i 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: H-2020-0017 Quartet Northeast H-2020-0018 Quartet Southeast LOCATION: 4020&4340 N. Black Cat Rd. [Parcels: #S0434233652; SO434244210; 50434233920; S0434325860 (partial), in the west '/4 of Section 34,TAN.,R.1W.] 1 ' I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Quartet Northeast(NE): Annexation of a total of 68.73 acres of land with R-8 (48.42 acres) and C-G(20.31 acres)zoning districts; and Preliminary Plat consisting of 137 buildable lots(136 residential and 1 commercial), 19 common lots, and 2 other lots on 66.52 acres of land in the R-8 and C-G zoning districts. Quartet Southeast(SE): Annexation of a total of 22.26 acres of land with an R-8 zoning district; and Preliminary plat consisting of 50 buildable lots and 10 common lots on 19.92 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district.Note:A property boundary adjustment application is currently in process with Ada County that will reconfigure the boundary of this property consistent with the Record of Survey(ROS)shown in Section VIII.A; the Applicant anticipates this application will be approved and the ROS recordedprior to the City Council hearing. Therefore, the annexation andplat boundaries are based on the boundary shown on the ROS and not the current parcel configuration shown on the maps included in this report. Because NMID owns the land where the Five Mile Creek is located which lies between the two properties proposed for development and does not wish for their land to be included in the subdivision, two (2)separate preliminary plat applications are required. Because the site is being developed as one overall property, one staff report has been prepared for both projects which includes analysis for each individual plat as well as for the overall development. The overall annexation area includes the Five Mile Creek as zoning goes to the centerline of waterways. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 66.52(NE)+ 19.92(SE)=86.44 acres(overall) Existing/Proposed Zoning RUT in Ada County(existing);R-8 and C-G(proposed) Pagel Item#9. Description Details I Page Future Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential(MDR)(3-8 units/acre)(50+/-acres)&Mixed Use—Non-Residential(MU-NR)(41+/-acres) Existing Land Use(s) Rural residential/agricultural Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family residential(SFR),commercial Lots(#and type;bldg./common) 186 residential buildable lots; 1 commercial buildable lot;29 common lots; and 2 other lots for shared driveways Phasing Plan(#of phases) 3 phases(overall between both subdivision) Number of Residential Units(type 186 detached SFR homes of units) Density(gross&net) NE:2.93 units/acre(gross);4.73 units/acre(net) SE:2.51 units/acre(gross);4.86 units/acre(net) NE&SE(overall): 2.8 units/acre(gross);4.76 units/acre(net) Open Space(acres,total NE: 7.6 acres [%]/buffer/qualified) SE: 3.4 acres NE&SE(overall): 11 acres(or 13%) Amenities Swimming pool,multi-use pathways,an additional 2.36+acres qualified open space beyond the minimum required and a tot lot with children's play equipment. Physical Features(waterways, Land containing the Five Mile Creek bisects the two(2)preliminary plats;a hazards,flood plain,hillside) portion of the site is within the floodplain in an approximate(A)zone. The Creason Lateral runs along the eastern portion of the north boundary of Quartet Northeast subdivision. Neighborhood meeting date;#of 1/21/20;9 attendees attendees: History(previous approvals) None B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Yes • Requires ACHD No Commission Action (yes/no) Traffic Impact Study(yes/no) Yes Access Two(2)accesses(Bell Tower Dr.,a local street&San Remo St.,a collector street) (Arterial/Collectors/State are proposed via N.Black Cat Rd.,an arterial street. Hwy/Local)(Existing and Black Cat Rd.is currently improved with 2-travel lanes and no curb,gutter or Proposed) sidewalk abutting the site.There is 50-70'of ROW for Black Cat Rd. (17-20' from centerline). Traffic Level of Service Better than"D"(Acceptable level of service is"E") Stub (1)collector and(1)local stub street is proposed to the north and(1)local stub Street/Interconnectivity/Cross street is proposed to the south to adjacent properties for future extension as Access depicted on the plat. Existing Road Network There are no existing streets within the site and no stub streets to the site;N.Black Cat Rd. exists along the west boundary of the site Existing Arterial Sidewalks/ There is no existing sidewalk or buffer along N.Black Cat Rd. ' Buffers Page 2 Item#9. Description Details Page Proposed Road Capital ImprGvmne,Ybt PlAn�CIPV hA&gndad Five Ydar Work PI an ffYWP}: Improvements + �M=k Cat Road it Limbed M(ha CIP to ba wiftmd to&Ears ittrm McMIllars Road to Ustick Road between 2021 and 2025 • The intaraectipn of Mcdulilfan Rued and E3iack Cat Rand is listed in the CIP to he eecactatrur;ted as a mulll•tane mundaboul wdh 4-lanes on the rronh leg.4-lanes an the south,2•Ianes oast, and 24anes on the west Eeg,anil nxoorrstruclad between 202B end 2030. The mnE&sacbm of UsLm%Road and Black Cat Road Is Fasted In the C IP to be reconstructed as a dual4ane roundabout with 44anes an the rwrih leg,daanas an the south,44anes east, and 44anes an the west leg.sno reoonslrudad betwftn 2021 ana 2025. A dedicated northbound right-turn lane&dedicated southbound left-turn lane is required to be constructed on Black Cat Rd.at Bell Tower Dr. &San Remo St. as recommended in the TIS. Fire Service • Distance to Fire Station 2 miles • Fire Response Time Falls within 5 minute response time goal - • Resource Reliability 76%-target goal is 80%or greater—does not meet the targeted goal • Risk Identification 2—current resources would not be adequate to supply service to this project • Accessibility Project meets all required access,road widths and turnarounds. • Special/resource needs Project will require an aerial device;response time is 12 minutes travel time- can't meet this need in the required timeframe if a truck company is required. • Water Supply Requires 1,000 gallons per minute for one hour,may be less if buildings are fully sprinklered. • Other Resources Police Service • Distance to Police 6.5 miles Station • Police Response Time Just under 5 minutes from Police Dept.;response time goal for emergencies is 3-5 minutes. • Calls for Service 283 (within a mile of site between 3/l/2019-2/29/2020) MM • Accessibility No concerns • Specialty/resource needs No additional resources are required at this time. • Crimes 28(within a mile of site between 3/l/2019-2/29/2020) • Crashes 19(within a mile of site between 3/l/2019-2/29/2020) • Other The MPD can provide service if this development is approved as they already serve this area. West Ada School District �nrollrrient capml • Distance(elem,ins, oesm.awoo hs) Messent 41ew Elementary Y a 675 9 kbpW • Capacity of Schools Slat Middle Sehool 542 loan 63 • #of Students rferldiep Nigh School a961 7404 4.0 Enrolled Que to the abundant arnoLmt of growth In the area.West Ada Is aetlyely hulldeng new school$,and bpwudaries an always rha+ ft.These hiture studtmu5 could potentially 8.tler4 Owyhee 141�h School, • Estimated#of 110 (NE)+40(SE)= 150 students from this development Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Directly adjacent Services • Sewer Shed North Black Cat Trunk Shed • Estimated Project Sewer See application ERU's Page 3 Item#9. • WRRF Declining 13.92 Balance • Project Consistent with Yes WW Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts/Concerns Applicant to ensure that the depths of the sanitary sewer allows for service of the property to the SE of Quartet Northeast per the Meridian Wastewater Master Plan. Water • Distance to Water Directly adjacent Services • Pressure Zone 1 • Estimated Project Water See application ERU's • Water Quality None • Project Consistent with Yes Water Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns The water main in N.Joy Way(furthest east road)should be a 12-inch.In addition,the water main in N.Joy Way will need to continue south through Quartet Southeast to provide a second connection out to Black Cat Rd.with the second hase of the development. C. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend 0 Legend 0 ��Project Lflcfliior �Wojec#LflcgioPs ii I�e R ria • Page 4 Item#9. Zoning Map Planned Development Map Legend C-00 -Legend -- 0 0 ff ff Proyect Lacainon IetProject Lccasor R- i Ci9y LlrniEs R-1 _ +- I — Planned Parcels R- R-N R- RU T' - R- C: L - R x---- RU R- R9 R'' III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Brighton Development, Inc.—2929 W.Navigator#400,Meridian, ID 83642 B. Owner: Quenzer Farms, LLLP—3680 N. Black Cat Rd.,Meridian,ID 83646 C. Representative: Michael D. Wardle,Brighton Corporation—2929 W.Navigator#400,Meridian,ID 83642 IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Notification published in 5/29/2020 7/10/2020 newspaper Notification mailed to property owners within 300 feet 5/26/2020 7/8/2020 Applicant posted public hearing 4/22/2020 7/15/2020 notice on site Nextdoor posting 5/27/2020 7/8/2020 V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS(Comprehensive Plan) Land Use: The Future Land Use Map(FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan designates the western 50+/-acres of the property as Medium Density Residential(MDR)and the eastern 41+/-acres as Mixed Use— Non-Residential(MU-NR). A City Park is also conceptually designated on the FLUM in this general area. Page 5 Item#9. The MDR designation allows for dwelling units at gross densities of 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The purpose of the MU-NR designation is to designate areas where new residential dwellings will not be permitted, as residential uses are not compatible with the planned and/or existing uses in these areas. For example, MU-NR areas are used near the City's Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility and where there are heavy industrial or other hazardous operations that need to be buffered from residential.Developments are encouraged to be designed similar to the conceptual MU-NR plan depicted in Figure 3E in the Comprehensive Plan(see page 3-18). Transportation: The Master Street Map(MSM) depicts a collector street from W.McMillan Rd.to the project's north boundary near the northeast corner of the site and a multi-lane roundabout at the mid-mile on Black Cat Rd. The Map depicts a future east/west collector street near the half mile on the west side of Black Cat. A collector street(San Remo St./N. Joy Way) is proposed from N. Black Cat Rd. to the north boundary in accord with the MSM. ACHD is not requiring a roundabout be constructed at this time as they feel it's not warranted based on the Traffic Impact Study(TIS) although additional right-of-way(ROW) is required to be dedicated to accommodate the future construction of the multi-lane roundabout. Proposed Development: The Applicant proposes to develop 66.35 acres of the subject overall property with 186 single-family detached dwelling units at an overall gross density of 2.8 units per acre; and 20.09 acres with non-residential/commercial uses to be determined in the future consistent with the FLUM. The eastern 18 acre residential portion of Quartet Northeast is located within the MU-NR designated area,which is a non-residential designated area that provides approximately a'/4 mile separation and buffer to the City's wastewater facility.Because the FLUM is not parcel specific,the Applicant requests the MDR designation on the western portion of the property is extended to the collector street(N.Joy Way), which bisects the eastern portion of the property.The portion of the property east of the collector street is proposed to be zoned C-G and developed with non-residential/commercial uses. Because the collector street will provide a"break"to future non-residential/commercial uses similar to that shown on the concept diagram for MU-NR designated areas included in the Comprehensive Plan (see Figure 3E on pg.3-18), Staff is amenable to this proposal if deemed appropriate by City Council. Staff does have concerns with residential uses in such close proximity to the Wastewater facility as foul odors are a concern in this area,thus the reason for the"non-residential"designation.For this reason, residential may not be a compatible use in this area.City Council should make this determination.Note: The Public Work's Dept. anticipates doing a noise%dor study later this year to determine the current impacts of the facility on adjacent properties, which may change the boundary of the MU-NR designated area. The Park's Dept. is not pursuing a City park in this location at this time; however,the non- residential/commercial lot(Lot 1,Block 14) on the east side of the collector street adjacent to the wastewater facility may be considered for a potential park site with a future development application on that property. Prior to any development occurring on this lot,the Applicant should coordinate with the Park's Department to determine if a City park is needed in this area. The following Comprehensive Plan Policies are applicable to this development: • "Encourage a variety of housing types that meet the needs, preferences, and financial capabilities of Meridian's present and future residents."(2.01.02D) Only one housing type is proposed in this development (i.e. single-family detached). The residential developments in this vicinity also contain standard single-family detached homes. Because this site is in close proximity to the City's Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility, Staff does not recommend a mix of housing types is provided as it would likely increase the density in this area, which is not desired. Page 6 Item#9. • "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and urban services at the time of final approval,and in accord with any adopted levels of service for public facilities and services."(3.03.03F) City water and sewer service is available and can be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. • "Avoid the concentration of any one housing type or lot size in any geographical area;provide for diverse housing types throughout the City."(2.01.01 G) Only one housing type is proposed in this development(i.e. single-family detached); the minimum lot size proposed is 6,866 with an average lot size of 9,145 square feet, which will accommodate a variety of housing styles consisting of I-and 2-story units. • "Encourage compatible uses and site design to minimize conflicts and maximize use of land." (3.07.00) The proposed single-family residential development is compatible with other residential and agricultural uses in the area; the future non-residential/commercial development should be compatible with the existing Wastewater facility to the southeast. The proposed residential uses in the MU-NR designated area may not be compatible with the Wastewater facility. The Public Work's Dept. anticipates doing a noise%dor study later this year to determine the current impacts of the facility on adjacent properties, which may change the boundary of the MU-NR designated area. • "With new subdivision plats,require the design and construction of pathway connections, easy pedestrian and bicycle access to parks, safe routes to schools,and the incorporation of usable open space with quality amenities." (2.02.01A) Segments of the City's multi-use pathway system are proposed off-site along the north boundary of the Five Mile Creek and along the east side of the proposed collector street in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. Detached sidewalks are proposed along the arterial and collector streets for safe pedestrian access. Usable open space and quality amenities are proposed(see detailed analysis below in Section VI.B). • "Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development."(3.03.03A) The proposed development will connect to City water and sewer systems; services are proposed to be provided to and though this development in accord with current City plans. • "Discourage residential land uses in close proximity to the Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility,the Intermountain Gas Facility on Can-Ada Road, and other incompatible land uses." (3.06.02E) The eastern 18 acre portion of the site in Quartet Northeast is within the MU-NR designated area on the FLUM, which is in close proximity to the wastewater facility. The expansion of residential uses in this area may not be compatible with the wastewater facility due to odors associated with the facility. • "Maximize public services by prioritizing infill development of vacant and underdeveloped parcels within the City over parcels on the fringe."(2.02.02) The proposed project is located in part of a larger "enclave"around the City's wastewater facility; development of this property will assist in maximizingpublic services. • "Require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks,water and sewer utilities."(3.03.03G) Page 7 Item#9. Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter and sidewalks is required to be provided with development as proposed. • "Annex lands into the corporate boundaries of the City only when the annexation proposal conforms to the City's vision and the necessary extension of public services and infrastructure is provided." (3.03.03) The proposed development plan is generally consistent with the City's vision in terms that medium density residential and non-residential uses are proposed;public services can be provided and infrastructure will be extended with development. • "Require collectors consistent with the ACHD Master Street Map(MSM), generally at/near the mid- mile location within the Area of City Impact."(6.01.03B) A collector street(San Remo St./N.Joy Way) is proposed from N. Black Cat Rd. that stubs to the north for future extension to McMillan Rd in accord with the MSM, which depicts a collector street from McMillan Rd. to the northeast corner of the proposed residential development. • "Plan for and allow land uses surrounding the Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility that reduce human exposure to odors."(4.10.01A) The residential uses proposed on 18 acres in Quartet Northeast in the MU-NR designated area may expose humans to odors associated with the wastewater facility. • "Coordinate with developers, irrigation districts, and drainage entities to implement the proposed pathway network along canals, ditches, creeks,laterals and sloughs."(3.08.02B) A 10 foot wide multi-use pathway is proposed along the north side of the Five Mile Creek adjacent to the south boundary of the Quartet Northeast preliminary plat on NMID's property. • "Slow the outward progression of the City's limits by discouraging fringe area development; encourage development of vacant or underutilized parcels currently within City limits."(4.05.03B) The proposed project is in a larger enclave area around the City's wastewater facility and is not on the fringe. Staff believes the proposed development plan is generally consistent with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density and transportation if City Council determines an extension of the MDR designation on the abutting 18 acres of land to the east is appropriate for the area currently designated MU- NR. VI. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ANALYSIS UD A. Annexation&Zoning: The Applicant proposes to annex a total of 90.99 acres of land between the two subdivisions with R-8 (70.68 acres)and C-G(20.31 acres) zoning consistent with the associated MDR and MU-NR FLUM designations in the Comprehensive Plan as discussed above in Section V. At the request of the City,the Applicant included the 0.97 acre out-parcel at the southwest corner of the Quartet Northeast subdivision where a sewer lift station is located in the annexation boundary. The single-family residential and future non-residential/commercial uses planned to develop on this site are consistent with uses desired in this area as discussed above in Section V. A conceptual development plan was not submitted for the non-residential/commercial lot proposed to be zoned C-G;the Applicant states this lot will be the subject of future discussion with the City regarding a potential park site as depicted on the FLUM or consideration of other potential buffer uses determined by the results of the Public Work's noise/odor study. Page 8 Item#9. The annexation area is within the Area of City Impact Boundary(AOCI). Legal descriptions for the annexation area are included in Section VIII.B; separate descriptions were submitted for each of the preliminary plat applications. The City may require a development agreement(DA)in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. In order to ensure the site develops as proposed with this application,staff recommends a DA as a provision of annexation with the provisions included in Section IX.The DA is required to be signed by the property owner(s)/developer and returned to the City within 6 months of the Council granting the annexation for approval by City Council and subsequent recordation. The Record of Survey depicted in Section VIII.A should be approved by Ada County and recorded prior to approval of the annexation ordinance and the Development Agreement for this project. Additionally,as a provision of the Development Agreement, Staff recommends the Applicant is required to coordinate with the Park's Dept.prior to development of the C-G zoned portion of the site on the east side of the collector street to determine if a City park is needed in that area. B. Preliminary Plat: Two separate preliminary plats, Quartet Northeast and Quartet Southeast, are proposed due to land owned by NMID containing the Five Mile Creek bisecting the two properties. Because both plats are proposed to develop and be marketed as one overall project, Staffs analysis is based on the overall project. Quartet Northeast consists of 137 buildable lots(136 residential and 1 commercial), 19 common lots,and 2 other lots on 66.52 acres of land in the R-8 and C-G zoning districts; and Quartet Southeast consists of 50 buildable lots and 10 common lots on 19.92 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district. Overall, a total of 186 residential buildable lots, 1 commercial buildable lot,29 common lots and 2 other lots are proposed between the two subdivisions. The minimum lot size proposed overall is 6,866 square feet(s.f.)with an average lot size of 9,145 s.£.;the gross density overall is 2.8 units/acre with a net density of 4.76 units/acre. The subdivision is proposed to develop in three(3)phases as depicted on the plat(see Section VIII.C). The first two phases are located along N. Black Cat Rd.with the third and final phase on the eastern portion of the site. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There is one existing home and accessory structures within the boundary of each preliminary plat that are proposed to remain on Lot 11,Block 7, Quartet Southeast and Lot 2,Block 1, Quartet Northeast subdivision. All existing accessory structures that don't comply with the setback standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 should be removed prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat on the phase in which they're located. The existing homes are required to disconnect from private service and hook up to City water and sewer service within 60 days of such services becoming available as set forth in MCC 9-1-4 and 9-4-8 respectively.Existing wells may be used for irrigation purposes only. The addresses of these homes will also be subject to change with subdivision of the property. Proposed Use Analysis: Single-family detached dwellings are listed as a principal permitted use in the R-8 zoning district per UDC Table 11-2A-2.Allowed uses in the C-G district are listed in UDC Table 11-2B-2. Although some residential uses are allowed in the C-G zoning district per UDC Table 11-2B-2, Staff recommends as a provision of the DA that no residential uses be developed on the non- residential/commercial C-G zoned lot on the east side of the collector street,including but not limited to, a multi-family development, a vertically integrated residential project, and/or a nursing/residential care facility unless a subsequent Noise and Odor Study conducted by the City determines residential uses are appropriate in that area. Page 9 Item#9. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): Development of the subject property is required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district and 11-2B-3 for the C-G district. Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards (UDC 11-6C-3) Development of the subdivision is required to comply with the subdivision design and improvement standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3, including but not limited to streets, common driveways and easements. There are two(2)common driveways proposed on common lots(i.e. Lots 10 and 16,Block 1); such driveways should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. A perpetual ingress/egress easement is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. An exhibit should be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks,fencing, building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via the common driveway; if a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street,the driveway should be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway.Address signage should be provided at the public street for homes accessed via common driveways for emergency wayfinding purposes. Access(UDC 11-3A-3) One(1)collector street(San Remo St./N.Joy Way)access is proposed in Quartet Southeast and one(1) local street access is proposed in Quartet Northeast via N. Black Cat Rd. The collector street is proposed to stub to the north at the northeast corner of the site for future extension to W. McMillan Rd. Local stub streets are proposed to the north and south to adjacent properties for future extension as depicted on the preliminary plats in Section VIII.C. Direct lot access via the arterial(Black Cat Rd.) and collector(San Remo St/N. Joy Way) streets is prohibited; the existing access via Black Cat Rd. for the home proposed to remain on Lot 2,Block 1 Quartet Northeast subdivision shall be removed and access taken from Belltower Dr. The bridge across the Five Mile Creek and the gravel fire access road from Black Cat Rd.in the location where the collector street is proposed is required to be constructed for emergency access for any development over 30 homes/lots as approved by the Fire Department. Because N.Joy Way is proposed to stub at the north boundary and is longer than 150'without a Fire Department approved turn around,the Fire Dept. requests a Type III barricade is placed at the intersection of N.Joy Way and Grand Rapids Dr.to prevent access until the street is extended in the future.The construction drawings should be revised to include this change.As an alternative to a barricade, a Fire Dept. approved turnaround could be provided at the end of the collector street. Parking(UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family detached dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. Future development should comply with these standards. Parking for non-residential uses is required per the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-6B.1. Pathways(UDC 11-3A-8): The Pathways Master Plan depicts a segment of the City's multi-use pathway system along the north side of the Five Mile Creek; and along the north and a short portion of the east side of the Quartet Northeast property. The Applicant proposes to construct an off-site 10-foot wide multi-use pathway along the north side of the Five Mile Creek and a detached 10-foot wide sidewalk/multi-use pathway along the east side of the collector street(N. Joy Way),north of the creek,to the north boundary of Quartet Northeast per discussions with the Park's Department. Legal descriptions for the pathway alignments (14-feet wide) Page 10 Item#9. should be submitted to the City in order for the pathways to be added to the City's Master Pathways Agreement. The pathway proposed on NMID's property will require a license agreement with NMID for the pathway and associated landscaping required by UDC 11-311-12C. The UDC (11-3B-12C) requires a 5-foot wide landscape strip to be provided along each side of the pathway,landscaped with a mix of trees,shrubs,lawn, and/or other vegetative groundcover.A minimum of one trees is required per 100 linear feet of pathway; the calculations table included on the landscape plan does not include the linear feet of pathways or trees proposed to demonstrate compliance with this requirement—the revised plan submitted with the final plat application should include this information. If NMID does not approve the pathway and associated landscaping to be located on their property, the pathway should be provided in a minimum 20-foot wide common lot within Quartet Northeast subdivision within a 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement. Staff recommends pedestrian pathways are provided from the internal sidewalks along Miramente Ct. and Miramente Dr.through adjacent common areas to the multi-use pathway along the Five Mile Creek; and micro-pathways are provided through Lot 10,Block 4 and Lot 7,Block 3 for pedestrian interconnectivity within the subdivision. All pathways shall be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8 and the Pathways Master Plan. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-1 The UDC(11-3A-17)requires, at a minimum, detached sidewalks to be provided along arterial and collector streets and attached sidewalk to be provided along local streets. Detached sidewalks are proposed along all internal streets,except around the cul-de-sacs, and within the street buffer adjacent to N. Black Cat Rd. and San Remo St./N. Joy Way in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-1 Eight-foot wide parkways are proposed adjacent to all streets where detached sidewalk are proposed; all parkways are required to be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): A 25-foot wide street buffer is required adjacent to N.Black Cat Rd., an arterial street; and a 20-foot wide street buffer is required adjacent to San Remo St./N. Joy Way, a collector street, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C, as proposed. Parkways are required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17 and 11-3B- 7C. Landscaping is proposed in accord with UDC standards. Landscaping is required along all pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C as discussed above. Common open space is required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3E. Landscaping is depicted in common areas in excess of UDC standards. There are existing trees on the site around the existing homes that are proposed to be retained that may require mitigation if removed. The Applicant should coordinate with Matt Perkins,the City Arborist,to determine mitigation requirements per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-10C.5 if existing trees are not proposed to be retained on the site.Any mitigation information shall be included in the calculations table on the landscape plan. Page 11 Item#9. If the unimproved right-of-way is 10 feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line,the Developer is required to maintain a 10 foot compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of ACHD and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.5.A license agreement for improvements within the right-of-way is required between the property owner and ACHD. Qualified Open Space(UDC 11-3 : A minimum of 10%qualified open space meeting the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B is required to be provided with development. Based on the area of the Quartet Northeast plat(66.52 acres),a minimum of 6.65 acres of qualified open space should be provided.A total of 7.6 acres(or 11.5%)is proposed in excess of UDC standards consisting of half the street buffer along the arterial street(N. Black Cat Rd.), all of the street buffer along the collector street(N. Joy Way), internal linear open space and common areas exceeding 50' x 100' in area. Based on the area of the Quartet Southeast plat(19.92 acres),a minimum of 1.99 acres of qualified open space should be provided. A total of 3.4 acres(or 17%) is proposed in excess of UDC standards consisting of half the street buffer along the arterial street(N. Black Cat Rd.), all of the street buffer along the collector street(San Remo St./N. Joy Way), and internal linear open space. Qualified Site Amenities (UDC 11-3 A minimum of one(1) qualified site amenity is required for each 20 acres of land to be developed as set forth in UDC 11-3G-3. Based on the area of the Quartet Northeast plat(66.52 acres),a minimum of three(3) qualified site amenities are required to be provided. A community swimming pool, a tot lot containing children's play equipment, one acre of extra qualified open space beyond the minimum standards and segments of the City's multi-use pathway system are proposed in excess of UDC standards. Based on the area of the Quartet Southeast plat(19.92 acres),a minimum of one(1) qualified site amenity is required to be provided. An additional 1.41 acres of qualified open space beyond the minimum standards is proposed as a site amenity in accord with UDC standards. Because Quartet Northeast and Southeast subdivisions will develop as one and be under the same Homeowner's Association, and common open space and site amenities will be shared, Staff believes the proposed open space and site amenities are adequate for the development with the inclusion of the micropath connections as recommended above. Waterways(UDC 11-3A-'U"I: The Creason Lateral runs across the eastern portion of the north boundary of Quartet Northeast subdivision in Lot 34,Block 4 within a 40-foot wide easement and is proposed to be left open. Because this area is included in the qualified open space calculations for the site,it should be landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3E—no landscaping is depicted on the landscape plan for that area. The Five Mile Creek is contained within land owned by NMID that lies between the two proposed preliminary plats. The creek should be protected during construction. A portion of the site is within the Five Mile Creek floodplain in an approximate(A)zone which will require a floodplain permit application,including hydraulic and hydrologic analysis to define base flood elevations and a floodway prior to any development occurring in the overlay district—contact Jason Korn,Public Work's,with any questions. Fencing(UDC 11-3A- : All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6C and 11-3A-7. Fencing is proposed as shown on the landscape plan. Page 12 Item#9. Six-foot tall solid wood fencing is proposed along the perimeter boundary of the site and along side yards adjacent to the street; and 5-foot tall clear vision fence is proposed adjacent to most internal common open space areas. To provide more visibility of the common area on Lot 34,Block 4 where the Creason Lateral is located, Staff recommends fencing adjacent to the common lot complies with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7A.7. The Creason Lateral is required to be fenced with an open vision fence at least 6' in height and having an 11-gauge,2"mesh or other construction,equivalent in ability to deter access to the waterway.If the Applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director that the waterway serves as or will be improved as a part of the development to be a water amenity as defined in UDC 11-1A-1,it is not required to be fenced per UDC 11-3A-6C.If it's improved as a water amenity, construction drawings and relevant calculations prepared by a qualified licensed professional registered in the State of Idaho shall be submitted to both the Director and the authorized representative of the water facility for approval. Staff recommends a break in the fence is provided on the south side of Lot 8,Block 6 adjacent to the Five Mile Creek for pedestrian access to the multi-use pathway. Storm Drainage: An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction is required to follow Best Management Practice as adopted by the City. Irrigation: Underground,pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided for each and every lot within the development in accord with MCC 9-1,Water Use and Service. Irrigation water will be provided from the Nampa&Meridian Irrigation District. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): The Applicant submitted several conceptual building elevations for the proposed single-family detached homes planned to be constructed in this development which are included in Section VIII.F. Homes depicted are a mix of 1-and 2-story units with building materials consisting of a variety of siding styles with stone/brick veneer accents.No elevations were submitted for the non-residential/commercial portion of the development as no development is proposed at this time. Because 2-story home elevations that face arterial and collector streets are highly visible, Staff recommends as a provision of the DA that the rear and/or side of structures on lots that face N. Black Cat Rd.,an arterial street, and San Remo St./N.Joy Way,a collector street,incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types,or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted and approved prior to submittal of any building permit applications for the swimming pool facility and the non- residential/commercial portion of the development. Design of these structures is required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual.Design review is not required for single- family detached homes. VII. DECISION A. Staff: If the City Council determines extending the MDR FLUM designation further to the east as proposed is appropriate, Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation and zoning with the requirement of a Page 13 Item#9. Development Agreement and approval of the requested preliminary plats with the conditions noted in Section IX.A per the Findings in Section X. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on June 18,2020. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing a. In favor: Mike Wardle,Brighton Corp. (Applicant's Representative),Jon Wardle, Brighton Corp_ b. In opposition: None c. Commenting:None d. Written testimony: Carrie Hovey e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen £ Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s) public testimony a. Concern pertaining to traffic &safety of existing 2-lane roadways and the amount of development occurring in this area which is worsening the situation and impact of more development on area schools—would like these applications to be rejected or at least postponed until road infrastructure and schools can be prepared to handle the additional impacts. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. Concerns pertaining to growth and traffic and the adequacy of existing infrastructure to handle more development until improvements are made in this area; IL. The option of requiring the noise/odor study to be complete prior to development of Phase 3 to determine if residential uses are appropriate in the area current MU-NR designated area. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Modification to condition#B 1.2 to require the water main in N.Joy Way to continue south through Quartet SE to provide a 2nd connection out to Black Cat Rd. with the 2nd phase of development, instead of the 1 st phase, as recommended b, Staff. 5. Outstanding issue(s)for City Council: a. None C. The Meridian Citv Council heard these items on July 28,2020.At the public hearing,the Council moved to approve the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Mike Wardle and Jon Wardle,Brighton Corn. b. In opposition: None C. Commenting: Denise LaFever d. Written testimony: Mike Wardle,Brighton Corp. (in agreement with the Commission's recommendation) e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen £ Other Staff commenting on application: Dale Bolthouse, Clint Dolsbv_ 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Opinion that it's not appropriate to approve C-G zoning without a development plan. b. Testimony from Dale Bolthouse that only 4 complaints have been received in the last 5 ears from downwind residents pertaining to an offensive odor generated from the wastewater treatment facility. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Council requested more information from Public Works in regard to the upcoming odor stud Page 14 Item#9. b. Concern pertaining to approval of residential uses in the MU-NR designated portion of Phase 3 prior to obtaining results from an updated odor study to determine if residential uses are appropriate in that area: c. Possible condition on Phase 3 and the commercial portion of the development to ensure City has the ability to restrict residential uses and possibly other uses in the MU-NR designated area if the odor study reflects a significant impact on this area: d. Concern of allowing C-G zoning without a conceptual development plan showin how the lot is to be developed. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. An odor study is required to be conducted by the City prior to development of Phase 3 to determine if residential uses are appropriate in the MU-NR designated area: if determined to not be appropriate,a modification to the DA shall be required to amend the development plan for that area(see new DA provision A.lil: a. Modify DA provision#A.1 f to require the DA to be modified to include a conceptual development plan for the C-G zoned area/lot prior to development. Page 15 Item#9. VIII. EXHIBITS A. Record of Survey for Property Boundary Adjustment in Ada County(Approved/Recorded) h � � 3 I z 5 Fr is -j41 1 LW F Etc FYe F I JhF ki s � x- . , Page 16 Item#9. B. Annexation Legal Description & Exhibit Map Quartet Northeast: lum 9233 WEST STATE STREET I SOISE,ID 83714 1 209.639.6939 1 FAX 208.639.6930 Aprrl 10,2020 Project No.19-010 Exhibit A legal Dewription for Annexation Quartet Northeast A parcel of land situated in a portion of the South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 34,Township 4 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as Follows: Commencing at a brass cap marking the Northwest corner of said Section 34,which bears NOU'27'24"F a distance of 2,631.60 feet from an aluminum cap marking the West 1/4 corner of said Section 34,thence fallowing the westerly line of said Northwest 1/4,S00 27'24W a distance of 1,315.80 feet to the North 1/16 corner of said Section 34 and'section 33 and being the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence leaving said westerly line and following the northerly line of said South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4,589'26'06"E a distance of 2,647.62 feet to an aluminum cap marking the Northeast corner of said South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4(C-N 1/16 corner); Thence leaving said northerly line and following the easterly line of Said South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4, 500°43'47"W a distance of 1,323.39 feet to a 518-inch rebar marking the center of said Section 34; Thence leaving said easterly line and following the southerly line of said Northwest 1/4,N89'16'14"W a distance of 1,129.66 feet to the centerline of Five Mile Drain; Thence leaving said southerly line and following said centerline the fallowing eight (9)courses: 1. N38'17'55"W a distance of 133.84 feet; 2. N46'51'55"W a distance of 134.69 feet; 3. N73'28'41"W a distance of 107.91 feet; 4. N79'57'01"W a distance of 202.45 feet; 5. N77'05'23"W a distance of 11210 feet; 6. N79'05'40'W a distance of 325.25 feet; 7 N78'22'23"W a distance of 307.52 feet; 8. N78'15'35"W a distance of 100.49 feet; Thence leaving said centerline.N00°27'24"E a distance of 236.72 feet, Thence N89'32'3VW a distance of 195.00 feet to the westerly line of said Northwest 1/4; Thence following said westerly line,N00'27'24"E a distance of 654.43 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 69,735 acres,more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and bVthis reference is hereby made a part of. *y* a ', 1459 0 IV. OF % dq to•1z2-D ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS I PIANNFRS Page 17 Item#9. 0 oa r- cc N Li m m d L EMINDW .M {OR O 0 6 Cn �� fu a m ko b� U Q] p� d 55RQ �n j U r� ss V as �¢ ii 2 m y w O 'a � o � U O •N Q N ,ze•cvsa �.ao.az.aes •5 � m } Ln � n uryi n ? {] x a w C7 Ln-44 m o pp e K m m uO ti m O O 2 w7{ Qr La.. Zrl " uj �� In F O ' m r d O N H r � 144eeJJ11rn .0 2 Ui IM1 w M] Q O Z a V F- O �QQy fQV tb 7 M in m N 0 f+7 N 7 YQl [) 73 U m+� N 40 6 ci N-ICI CCC �N V 6! p Y7 U Q V7 C V] xn 8 EA N u�'yv a ;g =° axi o c z w rW r m w 38R U w N LU Page 18 Item#9. Quartet Southeast: Ion 9233 WEST STATE STREE-T I BOISE,1D 83714 1 208-639.6939 1 FAX 2t18.639.6930 April 10,2020 Project No.19-010 Exhibit A Legal Description for Annexation and Rezone to R-8 Quartet Southeast A parcel of land situated in a portion of the North 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 and a portion of the South 1/2 of the!Northwest 1/4 all in Section 34,Township 4 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an aluminum cap marking the West 1/4 corner of said Section 34,which bears 500°27'24"W a distance of 2,631.60 feet from a brass rap marking the Northwest corner of said Section 34,thence following the westerly line of said Northwest 1/4,N00°27'24"E a distance of 450,24 feet to the centerline of Five M ile ❑rain; Thence leaving said westerly line and following said centerline the following nine(9)courses: 1. S83°53'03"E a distance of 33.19 feet; 2. 578°15'35"E a distance of 265.65 feet; 3. S78°22'23"E a distance of 307.52 feet; 4. 579°05'40"E a distance of 326.25 feet; 5. 577°05'23"E a distance of 112.20 feet; 6. 579°57'01"E a distance of 202.45 feet; 7. 573'28'41"E a distance of 107.81 feet; 3. 546°51'55"E a distance of 134.69 feet; 9. 538'17'55"E a distance of 133.84 feet to the southerly line of said Northwest 1/4; Thence leaving said centerline and following said southerly line,N89"16'14"W a distance of 191-01 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Northeast corner of said West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4(C-W 1/16 corner}; Thence leaving said southerly line and`ollowing the easterly line of said West 112 of the Southwest 114, $00°35'24"W a distance of 25.93 feet; Thence leaving said easterly line,60,97 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 517.00 feet,a delta angle of 06°45'23",a chord bearing of 547'09'17"W and a chord distance of 60.93 feet; Thence S43'46'36"W a distance of 306.45 feet; Thence 423.64 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right,said curve haying a radius of 520.00 feet,a delta angle of 46"40'43",a chord bearing of 567"06'57"W and a chord distance of 412-02 feet; Thence N89°32'41"W a distance of 589.03 feet; Thence 545°27'19"W a distance of 29A9 feet; Thence 500°27'12"W a distance of 79.36 feet; Thence N89"32'48"W a distance of 78.00 feet to the westerly line of said Southwest 1/4; Thence following said westerly line,N00'27'12"E a distance of 560.22 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 22.26 acres,more or less. 94 Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is hereby made a part of. R' o 1245►9 o If OF L. a ENGINEERS 4 SURVEYORS I PLANNERS /0'?-02-0 Page 19 Item#9. 28 2-j W. McMillan Rd. 33 34 FOUND BRASS CAP NORTHWEST CORNER SEC-11ON 34 0 125 250 500 N Scale: 1"=25Q' Unplatted SOT53'03"E " 33.19' — S78'15'35"E 265.65' 578'22'23"E 307.52' S7705'40"E w � ! � 32$.25' S77'05'23"E x fi 11 112.20 S79'57'01'E q Mil ntFlIf1E Dr 202.45' z a117 S73328'41'E M 107.81` S46.51'55"E SE-43423392 U \134.69' POINT OF BEGINNING 53$17'55"E FOUND ALUMINUM CAP 133.54' 33 wEST ir4 CORNER SECTION 34 SOO'35'24"W 34 25.93' — Annexation Area. 22.26±AC. Ca N89'18'14 W Current Zoning: RUT 191,01' Proposed Zoning: R-8 ` C--w 1/16 SO434325860(Portion'I &SO434234020(portion) SEC TON 34 ryro to m"U o f `1 S4527'19W p"I m 29.19, IUnplatted a rn r m N5732'41"W W9.03' G z s00'27'12"W 79,36' 7500' 48'1hf Unplatted FOUND ALUMINUM CAP SW CORNER SECTION 34 33 34 T.4N., R.1W.W, McMillan Rd. T.3N., R.JW. — — �pl. LANq LEGEND '�� is FOUND BRASS CAP ; FOUND ALUMINUM CAP 12459 '0 5/8—INCH REBARkin A CALCULATED POINT --jr� �T£ or y4P 4a ANNEXATION & REZONE 6OUNDARY 'P4q► B A� ENGFNEERS.SURVEYORS.PLANNERS — —SECTION LINE • h, 7,0 9233 WEST STATE STRE ET NOISE.IDARO83714 YFFF]!LE(209)639 E939 FAX Ims)639-6936 Exhibit B Annexation and Rezone FATE' ApriF2020 PROJECT- 19-014 SHEET: Quartet Southeast Subdivision 1 OF 1 N1/2 W1/2 SW1/4 &51/2 NW1/4 Sec. 34, T4N, R1W, B.M., Ada County, ID Page 20 Item#9. City Lift Station Lot: lam 9233 WEST STATE STREET I BOISE,ID 83714 1 208.639,6939 I FAX 20U39.6930 April 20,2020 Project No.19-010 Exhibit A Legal Description for Annexation and Rezone to R-8 City of Meridian Parcel A parcel of land situated in a portion of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 all in Section 34, Township 4 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a brass cap marking the northwest corner of said Section 34,which bears NOO'27'24"E a distance of 2,631.60 feet from an aluminum cap marking the west 1/4 of said Section 34,thence following the westerly line of said Northwest 1/4,SOO'27'24"W a distance of 1,980.23 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence leaving said westerly line,S89'32'36"E a distance of 195.00 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; Thence 500'27'24"W a distance of 236.72 feet to centerline of Five mile Drain; Thence following said centerline, N78'15'35"W a distance of 165.16 feet; Thence following said centerline, N83°53'03"W a distance of 33.19 feet to the westerly line of said Northwest 114; Thence leaving said centerline and following said westerly line, N00°27'24"E a distance of 201.13 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 0.974 acres,more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is hereby made a part of. T 12459 Q L, BALti'� ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS I PLANNERS Page 21 Item#9. 28 27 W. McMillan Rd. 33 34 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT N FOUND BRASS CAP NW CORNER SECT]ICN 34 I� M 0 ro I 0 56 100 200 I� N N Scale: 1"=100' b 0 POINT OF BEGINNING S89'32'36"E 195.Ofl' Z LEGEND j" FOUND BRASS CAP FOUND ALUMINUM CAP o `' ��a• S/B-INCH REBAR N x�Yr �3N 3�b`PgC ISM Ct A CALCULATED POINT $ N BQUNNDG4ATRIY & REZONE N��r5'3s N83'53'03"W 76�FFjve 33.19' Mile [tall? Uf U N y,4 Gl LAft S x � o 12459 33 34 ��qTf tg4 O1�k CORNER SECTION 34 ALUMINUM � ��OF 1�19 ENGINEERS.SUAVEVORS.PU4NNER5 NEST �"� .�� 9233 5NE5T STATE 51REET B44E,Inn HO 33714 PHONE P03)639-693R FAX JMS)639-69-M Exhibit B Annexation and Rezone to R-S DATE: Apr'12000 PROJECT: 19-0M SHEET: City of Meridian Parcel -4130 N. Black Cat Rd. 1 OF 1 5W 1/4 NW 1/4 Sec. 34, T4N., R1W., B.M.,Ada County, Idaho Page 22 Item#9. C. Preliminary Plat(date: 1/31/2020)&Phasing Plan Quartet Northeast: QUARTET HORTHEMTSU&91Va94H PRE UMIrmuPLAT 1 h I1+dA{14411h4151RLL7F0IL THk 5SH 11H lf144 CHI wQrl7rrM'jT 111[II:IlCN somwHr,1 wffrK m*r.1 lw[Lr im Dr L■■O AN.JLh mu".EAAD e_..rh�u M Y 4 • ■ ■ .. r ■ r I'. x41 a ad.a witi"f� FF V ■ 1{ R A P s n x 'r Y -� IRA a ki I ' S o_w[[rr w.lrtwnx.e=nlr'it .. Page 23 A JL_lL A .2 A M I A I A A PW.PW4 A 4L w i YA a.M�Im 40 WIRV A IL kmvW A I A & L' 2. A A A t WA 7 7 t T $. 9p. of A 4p A A IF- 44. Page 24 Item#9. ii i r I r dp ee •f m nurwr.Tlrarr.�,ra5y�r.�un. Quartet Southeast: QUARTf7$0�]T PAST$4JHINVISIONPR9�1MiNARYPLA7 x{wnL tIP.WG YNMlra lx A h3lgMe,a Trlk Yxnn Ej2 or tmE pw3k!hmlST V4 I 4ND PMTIDM OF THE WEST W Ex THE 93UNWESl 1A Cry UCrK 43t 1OWN NIFi II OWN.IVIR I MIS.On O 46ILRI UM,ADA WIJNIV.VANa f�MlTFT�rJf.{,{$!SI:TQIN[Yfl al • Page 25 Item#9. 1 rSii I gwrnTs<zmruTw�or.,�al - 13L MS 41 i im � --r " Y �w,eiiOurxEulwedwHOM Page 26 Phasing Plan: L T$ 1 2. s 41 M7 -T7 IL t- I, AN- JL gi i IL IL T _7' Rt ff.sV IL JL IL 2L IL L Page 27 Item#9. D. Landscape Plan(date: 1/30/2020) Quartet Northeast: .S MPG � I .� �11#9RIILLLL 6111 i I 4 m LD Met MIA ARM d Ff]SfS�F R AN Page 28 Item#9. I i .:i i') �;��.�. .•sue .... I _ y . • V Mann. •ri++ f+ ' I I O K ...... I'r :::.....ti......i... +F f - I _ ]u W'RI NGF IIi[Wl Y..8Wh51G4 t� w� TALL- Quartet Southeast: I I I' I Bkl(;HTON Page 29 Item#9. 7I i . _ .. r V'�.•" rmxaa uw we { mywjhr z sx � - .,*m3 a1.111r-- •--— —.. .�i: ia�k.�t- .a a s�zc�,•aJ� itr' - '- �� .�—_ _., w.4�•�ayM—� Y•- g;w—� RUu7F'r SJlRxE+ff i4lCnMUY rr icrauSLaP sff ,W .+� _ , IX — �.• Pf41E *•�x�7 , -=MM awamioUTKEP r nmrw,oN Page 30 Item#9. E. Qualified Open Space Exhibit(dated: 6/11/2020) Quartet Northeast: ` auAkrFrNORr} �srsueon+dslQfeoviEhlSFACEEXMIW � f � ti= Quartet Southeast: "RTET SOME AST SUM V1610r1 OPEN SPACE MOM AU .Lr�� uwrn x+��xa z I MOF Page 31 �vw�rF.r�l,�n �lo�r s _ r hi it �r Ad y ` . - .+..mow.•f. "ff --- - ~' AL ', 13 P,I G HTOIN 4. TTTICA1.2LSVATTG01-;i r■3 Min - 1 11��ryA�fee"" 3 y d. F� Ii u 11 uulb . f RICiHTON B1 1GHTON " '' Item#9. IX. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. A Development Agreement(DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s)at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The Record of Survey depicted in Section A1111.A shall be ftpffoved by Ada County and meor-ded pr4or to City Couneil appFoval of the Annexation Or-dinanee and Development Agreement for- The DA shall,at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat, phasing plan, landscape plan, qualified open space exhibit and conceptual building elevations included in Section VIII and the provisions contained herein. b. The existing homes that are to be retained on lots in the proposed subdivision are required to disconnect from private systems and hook up to City water and sewer service within 60 days of such services becoming available as set forth in MCC 9-1-4 and 9-4-8 respectively. Existing wells may be used for irrigation purposes only. c. The existing homes to be retained on lots in the proposed subdivision will be assigned new addresses with subdivision of the property. d. The Five Mile Creek shall be protected during construction. e. No residential uses shall be developed on the non-residential/commercial C-G zoned lot on the east side of the collector street(depicted as Lot 1,Block 14 on the preliminary lat ,including but not limited to, a multi-family development, a vertically integrated residential project, and/or a nursing/residential care facility unless a subsequent Noise and Odor Study conducted by the City determines residential uses are appropriate in that area. f. The Developer shall coordinate with the City Park's Department prior to development of the non-residential/commercial lot(depicted as Lot 1,Block 14 on the preliminary platl on the east side of the collector street(N.Joy Way) to determine if a City Park is needed in this area as designated on the Comprehensive Plan. The Development Agreement shall be amended to include a conceptual development plan for that area prior to any_ development occurring on that lot. g. The rear and/or side of structures on lots that face N. Black Cat Rd., an arterial street, and San Remo St./N.Joy Way, a collector street, shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays, banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. h. Quartet Northeast and Southeast subdivisions shall develop and be phased as one project and shall be included in the same Homeowner's Association; all common open space and site amenities between the two subdivisions shall be shared. i. An odor study shall be conducted by the City prior to development of Phase 3 to determine if residential uses are appropriate in the MU-NR designated area: if determined to not be appropriate. Page 33 Item#9. a modification to the Development Agreement shall be required to amend the development plan for that area. 2. The final plat(s) submitted for this development shall incorporate the following: a. Include a note stating direct lot access via N. Black Cat Rd. and San Remo St./N. Joy Way is prohibited. 3. The landscape plan submitted with the final plat application shall be revised as follows: a. Add pedestrian pathways from the internal sidewalks along Miramente Ct. and Miramente Dr. through adjacent common areas to the multi-use pathway along the Five Mile Creek;provide breaks in the fence where necessary to provide a connection. Also provide micro-path connections through Lot 10,Block 4 and Lot 7,Block 3 for pedestrian interconnectivity within the subdivision. b. Landscaping shall be depicted on either side of all pathways as set forth in UDC 11-3B-12C. Calculations shall be included for the linear feet of pathway and the required vs. provided number of trees in the Calculations table. c. If any existing trees are proposed to be removed from the site,the Applicant shall schedule an inspection with the City Arborist,Matt Perkins,prior to removal of any such trees to determine mitigation requirements in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-1OC.5. Mitigation information shall be included in the calculations table on the plan if applicable. d. If the unimproved right-of-way is 10 feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line,the Developer is required to maintain a 10 foot compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of ACHD and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.5. A license agreement for improvements within the right-of-way is required between the property owner and ACHD. e. Depict fencing adjacent to the Creason Lateral as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6C.3 in order to preserve public safety unless the waterway is proposed to be improved as part of the development to be a water amenity. In such case, documentation shall be submitted as set forth in UDC 11-1A-1 and 11-3A-6C.2 for approval by the Director. £ The location of site amenities shall be depicted on the plan; a detail shall be submitted for the children's play equipment. g. Depict landscaping in Lot 34,Block 4 in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3E. h. Depict fencing on Lot 34,Block 4 where the Creason Lateral is located per the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7A.7 to provide more visibility of the common area. i. Depict a 6-foot tall open vision fence having an 11-gauge, 2 inch mesh or other construction equivalent in ability to deter access to the Creason Lateral on Lot 34,Block 4 in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6C.3 unless the waterway is proposed to be improved as part of the development to be a water amenity. In such case,construction drawings and relevant calculations prepared by a qualified licensed professional registered in the State of Idaho shall be submitted to both the Director and the authorized representative of the water facility for approval. 4. Future development shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-6 and 11-2B-3 for the R-8 and C-G zoning districts respectively. 5. The bridge across the Five Mile Creek and the gravel fire access road from Black Cat Rd. in the location where the collector street is proposed shall be constructed for emergency access for any development over 30 homes/lots as approved by the Fire Department. 6. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 Page 34 Item#9. based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 7. An exhibit shall be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks, fencing,building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via common driveways; if a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street,the driveway shall be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D. 8. Address signage shall be provided at the public street for homes accessed via common driveways for emergency wayfinding purposes. 9. A perpetual ingress/egress easement shall be filed with the Ada County Recorder for the common driveways,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D.8. A copy of said easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division with the final plat for City Engineer signature; or,this information may be included on the face of the plat. 10. A Type III barricade shall be placed at the intersection of N. Joy Way and Grand Rapids Dr. to prevent access until the street is extended in the future;the construction drawings shall be revised to include this change. As an alternative to a barricade, a Fire Dept. approved turnaround could be provided at the end of the collector street instead. 11. All existing structures that don't comply with the setback standards listed in UDC 11-2A-6 shall be removed from the site prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer for the phase in which they are located. 12. A 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division for the 10-foot wide multi-use pathways proposed within the site that are not located within right-of-way,prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 13. The existing access via Black Cat Rd. for the home proposed to remain on Lot 2,Block 1, Quartet Northeast subdivision shall be removed. 14. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted and approved prior to submittal of any building permit applications for the swimming pool facility in the residential portion of the development; and for all non-residential/commercial uses. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 Applicant to ensure that the depths of the sanitary sewer allows for service of the property to the SE of Quartet Northeast per the Meridian Wastewater Master Plan. 1.2 The water main in N Joy Way(furthest east road) should be a 12-inch. Also,the water main in N Joy Way will need to continue south through Quartet Southeast to provide a second connection out to Black Cat Road with the fit second phase of the development. 1.3 Consider eliminating the short dead-end water main in the cul-de-sac off of Exeter Avenue and Capriana Drive, instead install three services to the three cul-de-sac homes off the mainline in Capriana Drive. 1.4 From the preliminary investigation of groundwater elevation provided in the application, it appears that shallow groundwater may be a factor with the development of this subdivision. Additional monitoring and analysis shall be required to ensure that homes constructed within this development do not encounter groundwater within their crawl spaces. Updated data and recommendations from a geotechnical professional shall be required with the submittal of construction design drawings. Page 35 Item#9. 1.5 A portion of this project lies within the Meridian Floodplain Overlay District. Prior to any development occurring in the Overlay District,a floodplain permit application,including hydraulic and hydrologic analysis is required to be completed and submitted to the City and approved by the Floodplain Administrator per MCC 10-6. 2. General Conditions of Approval—Quartet Northeast& Quartet Southeast 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet,if cover from top of pipe to sub- grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x 11"map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B)for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals,or drains, exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)898- 5500 for inspections of disconnection of services.Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at(208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. Page 36 Item#9. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C- 3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting.A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public works.aspx?id=272. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond.Applicant must Page 37 Item#9. file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT Northeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=187210&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity Southeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=187211&dbid=0&repo=Meridian City Phasing: https:llweblink.meridianciU.oLglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=187133&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiU D. POLICE DEPARTMENT https:llweblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=187674&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity E. PARK'S DEPARTMENT Northeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=190216&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCitX Southeast: No comments were submitted F. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO(COMPASS) Northeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=188456&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity Southeast: https:llweblink.meridianciU.org/WebLinklDocView.aspx?id=188457&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity G. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.asp x?id=1891 73&dbid=0&r0o=Meridian City H. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT(NMID) Northeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=188676&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity Southeast: https:llweblink.meridianciU.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=188675&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCitE I. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT Northeast: https:llweblink.meridiancitE.oL-glWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=187426&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity Southeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.oLvlWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=187427&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiiy J. IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT(ITD) Northeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.org WWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=189529&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiiy Southeast: Page 38 Item#9. https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=189614&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity K. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) Northeast: https:llweblink.meridiancity.org/WebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=187575&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiu Southeast: https:llweblink.meridianciU.oLvlWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=187574&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiu X. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-513-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment to R-8& C-G and proposed development is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is appropriate with an extension of the MDR FL UM land use designation to the collector street as proposed if the Applicant complies with the provisions in Section IX. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the proposed single-family detached homes will contribute to the range of housing opportunities in the City. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The City Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment will not result in an adverse impact on the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The City Council finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City if the property is developed in accord with the provisions in Section IX. B. Preliminary Plat Findings: In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; The City Councilfinds that theproposedplat, with the Commission's recommendations, is in substantial compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density, transportation, and pedestrian connectivity. (Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies in, Section V of this report for more information) Page 39 Item#9. 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds that public services will be provided to the subject property with development. (See Exhibit B of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers) 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the development at their own cost, the City Council finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development based upon comments from the public service providers (i.e., Police, Fire, ACHD, etc). (See Section Mfor more information) 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health,safety or general welfare; and, The City Council is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated with the platting of this property. ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The City Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that exist on this site that require preserving. Page 40 Item#10. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Agreement Between City of Meridian and Envision 360 Inc. to Accept Payment in Lieu of Installing Streetlights at 1351 E. Fairview Ave. in the Estimated Amount of$8465.00 Item#10. C� fIEN , IN1, IDAHO MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Al Christy, Public Works Meeting Date: August 11, 2020 Presenter: Public Works Representative Estimated Time: 5 Minutes Topic: Agreement Between City of Meridian and Envision 360 Inc. to Accept Payment in Lieu of Installing Streetlights at 1351 E. Fairview Ave. in the Estimated Amount of $8465.00 Recommended Council Action: 1. Approve the attached agreement with Envision 360 Inc. 2. Authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement. Background: I. DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSONS Al Christy, Transportation and Utility Coordinator 489-0352 Warren Stewart, City Engineer 489-0350 Dale Bolthouse, Director of Public Works 985-1257 Il. DESCRIPTION A. Background One of the site specific conditions of approval for Building Permit#C-Shell-2020- 0015 is to provide sufficient funds for the installation of street lighting along E. Fairview Ave. The Streetlight will be installed once the Ada County Highway District (ACHD) has improved E. Fairview Ave. to its ultimate width. B. Proposed Project Pursuant to the attached agreement with Envision 360 Inc.,the City will accept the estimated amount of$8,465.00, required to install one streetlight on E. Fairview Ave. These funds will be used to install the streetlight once ACHD has completed road expansion in the area. Envision 360 Inc., is in favor of this solution and has signed the attached agreement. Item#10. III. IMPACT A. Strategic Impact: This agreement is in alignment with the Public Works Department's Strategic Plan 2010-2015 Objective ENG-12, which is to increase street lighting throughout the City to enhance the safety of our citizens in a fiscally responsible manner. B. Service/Delivery Impact: This agreement will increase the street lighting along E. Fairview Ave.while ensuring that the lights are installed at the appropriate time and in the appropriate location. C. Fiscal Impact: Per this agreement, the City will receive $8,465.00. This is the estimated amount required to install the street light along E. Fairview Ave. and these funds will be reserved for that specific purpose. IV. TIME CONSTRAINTS Council approval of this agreement will allow Envision 360 Inc. to remit the required funds to the City and receive their Subdivision approval once all other requirements have been met. V. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS • Agreement Between City of Meridian and Envision 360 Inc. to Accept Payment in Lieu of Installing Streetlights at 1351 E. Fairview Ave. in the Estimated Amount of$8465.00 • Street Light Agreement Envision 360 Inc. Approved for Council Agenda: Z Item#10. AGREEMENT TO ACCEPT PAYMENT IN LIEU OF INSTALLING STREETLIGHTS AT 1351 E. FAIRVIEW AVE. THIS AGREEMENT for streetlight installation, made this is day of July, 2020 between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho(hereinafter"City"),and Envision 360Inc., 104 E. Fairview Ave. #233, Meridian, ID 83642 (hereinafter "Envision"). WHEREAS, Envision has received from City, conditional approval of a Building Permit at 1351 E. Fairview, Building Permit No. C-SHELL-2020-0015; and, WHEREAS,One of the Site Specific Conditions of Approval of City's approval of C-SHELL-2020- 0015 is to install streetlights on all public roadways per the City of Meridian Improvement Standards for Street Lighting; and, WHEREAS, Envision is currently unable to install the required streetlights on E. Fairview Avenue because E. Fairview Avenue has not been built out to its ultimate width; and, WHEREAS, once the E. Fairview Avenue is widened, City is willing to install the required streetlight if Envision has paid to City the estimated amount necessary to install the streetlight. NOW THEREFORE,THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Envision shall pay to City the amount of $8,465.00 as the amount necessary to supply and install one (1)type 1 streetlight. 2. City agrees to accept the amount set forth in Article 1 in lieu of requiring Envision to install the one (1) streetlight on E. Fairview Avenue frontage of C-SHELL-2020-0015. 3. Upon payment of the amount in Article 1 by Envision to City, Envision's requirement to install the one (1) streetlight on E. Fairview Ave. shall be considered satisfied. 4. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their heirs,successors and assigns, and shall survive any transfer by Envision of Envision's Property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties shall cause this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers the day and year first above written. Envision 360 Inc. CITY OF MERIDIAN By: L-x�::::gjBy Chad Olsen, President Robert E. Simison, Mayor Item#11. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Agreement Between the City of Meridian and Nampa Meridian Irrigation District to Authorize the City to Discharge Water from Well 32 in to the Ridenbaugh Canal for a Designated Period Item#11. 1 PROJECT AGREEMENT This PROJECT AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 11 th day of August 2020, by and between NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT, an irrigation district organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Idaho, party of the first party,hereinafter referred to as the"District," and THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, a political subdivision and municipality of the State of Idaho, 33 East Broadway Avenue,Meridian,Idaho 83642 party or parties of the second part,hereinafter referred to as the"City," WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,the parties hereto entered into a Master Agreement entered into March 18, 2014 and recorded as Instrument No. 114029168 in the records of Ada County,Idaho, hereinafter referred to as the"Master Agreement;" and, WHEREAS,the District and the City intended by entering the Master Agreement to establish a process for the City's submission of encroachment proposals and the District's consideration of such proposals and to provide the general conditions for the District's approval j and permission of encroachment proposals affecting the District's ditches, property, operations j and maintenance; and, WHEREAS, the City is tho owner of the real property/right of way(burdened with the easement of the District hereinafter mentioned)particularly described in the"Legal Description" attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference made a part hereof; and, WHEREAS,the District controls the irrigation/drainage ditch or canal known as the RIDENBAUGH CANAL(hereinafter collectively referred to as"ditch or canal") together with the real property and/or easements to convey irrigation and drainage water,to operate and maintain the ditch or canal, and which crosses and intersects said described real property of the City as shown on Exhibit B attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof; and, WHEREAS, the City seeks permission to: 1)temporarily discharge water from the City's Well Site#32 into the Ridenbaugh Canal through the existing discharge pipe and valve located in the District's easement for the Ridenbaugh Canal where the Ridenbaugh Canal intersects W. Overland Road,under the terms and conditions of said Master Agreement and those hereinafter set forth, i PROJECT AGREEMENT Page 1 of 5 Item#11. NOW,THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and of the covenants, agreements and conditions hereinafter set forth and those set forth in said Master Agreement,the parties hereto agree as follows; 1, City may, a)temporarily discharge water from the City's Well Site#32 into the Ridenbaugh Canal through the existing discharge pipe and valve located where the Ridenbaugh Canal intersects W. Overland Road; and b)modify the existing discharge pipe,valve and flange within the District's easement to temporarily discharge water from the City's Well Site#32 into the Ridenbaugh Canal, located northeast of the intersection of Ten Mile Road and Overland Road in Meridian,Ada County, Idaho as shown in the attached project plans stated as Exhibit B- 1. 2. Any construction or crossing of said ditch or canal shall be performed in accordance with the project plans shown in Exhibit B-1 and the"Special Conditions" stated in Exhibit C, attached hereto and by this reference made part thereof. 3. The parties hereto incorporate in and make part of this Project Agreement all the covenants, conditions, and agreements of said Master Agreement unchanged except as the result of the provisions of this Project Agreement. The covenants, conditions and agreements herein contained and incorporated by reference shall constitute covenants to run with, and running with, all of the lands of the City described in said Exhibit A, and shall be binding on each of the parties hereto and on all parties and all persons claiming under them or either of them, and the advantages hereof shall inure to the benefit of each of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. END OF TERMS - SEE FOLLOWING PAGES FOR SIGNATURES PROJECT AGREEMENT Page 2 of 5 Item#11. I IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the District has hereunto caused its corporate name to be subscribed by its officers first hereunto duly authorized by resolution of its Board of Directors and the City has hereunto subscribed its corporate name to be subscribed and its seal to be affixed thereto, all as of the day and year herein first above written. I NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT By Its President ATTEST: Its Secretary THE CITY OF MERIDIAN By. Its Mayor, Robert E. Simison ATTEST; Chris Johnson, City Clerk i i i i PROJECT AGREEMENT Page 3 of 5 Item#11. STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss: County of Canyon ) On this day of , 2020,before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared Will Patterson and Michael Comeskey,known to me to be the President and Secretary,respectively, of NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT, the irrigation district that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that such irrigation district executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed any official seal,the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public for Residing at , My Commission Expires: STATE OF IDAHO ) ss: County of Ada } On this 1 I th day of August , 2020,before me, the undersi ed, a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared Robert E. Simision and hris Johnson known to me to be the Ma or and City Clerk ,respectively, of The CITE'' OF MERIDIAN,the entity that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that such entity executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal,the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public for_ Idaho Residing at Meridian, Idaho., My Commission Expires: 3-28-2022 PROJECT AGREEMENT Page 4 of 5 Item#11. i EXHIBIT A Legal Description The City's well site is described in Exhibit A-1 attached hereto and the right of way for the flush line from the well to the Ridenbaugh Canal is shown in Exhibit A-2 attached hereto, The location where the flush line will discharge to the Ridenbaugh Canal is located where the Ridenbaugh Canal intersects W. Overland Road in the NW1/4 of Section 23,Township 3 North, Range 1 West, B.M.,Ada County, Idaho. EXHIBIT B Crossing Location See Exhibit B-1 attached hereto. EXHIBIT C Special Conditions a. Discharge and/or construction of the flush line shall be in accordance with Exhibit B-1, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. The flush line will allow the discharge of a maximum of plow into the Ridenbaugh Canal of 3.5 cubic feet per second for a duration of not more than 55 days. The flush line shall be removed and all discharge to the Ridenbaugh Canal shall cease at the end of the 202.0 irrigation season. b. City shall notify the water superintendent of the District prior to and immediately after construction so that he or the District's engineers may inspect and approve the construction. The City shall also notify the District prior to any flushing and when said flushing,is completed. At the request of the District,the City shall provide measurement and other records,including water quality records, for the quantity and quality of the water discharged/flushed to the Ridenbaugh Canal. C. City acknowledges that the District's casement for the Ridenbaugh Canal includes a sufficient area of land to convey irrigation and drainage water,to operate, clean,maintain and repair the Ridenbaugh Canal, and to access the Ridenbaugh Canal for those purposes, and that,in the location of the City's project,NMID claims a minimum easement dimension for the Ridenbaugh Canal of 100 feet, 50 feet to either side of the centerline. d. The duration of the permission granted by this Project Agreement shall be in temporary and shall cease at the end of the 2020 irrigation season. END OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS PROJECT AGREEMENT Page 5 of 5 Item#11. EXHIBIT"A-1" 1-0 NO PRO C. ir I � � � / QO / n ::A N S —r iQ al'.'i ram• may" � + ,�...+�'�'��~�~ g � -------------- m Fn w BASS OF BEARING �" I `��' N 0F2-e47" B 2642.'9T 0 13 I to SCALE "plda' PROPOSED WELL LOT FINE RING DKOATE 06/16/16 paw. No. 44.0529 GRAYCLIFF ESTATES SUBDIVISION SOLUTIONS SHEET 15 1 Off' 1 LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF SEGTION 25, T• .3N., R.1W B.M. ia2a td�RInUW, 1p FOSA sT.. sTE. tno � . . AHo 83842 140529-WELL,DWG W MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Fhnnn(28B)938-00 Fox(900) 038-0941 Item#11. EXHIBIT"A-2" June 16, 2016 D-es-cil0on or ro o ed VlelLo Proposed Graydiff Estates Subdivision i A parcel located In the SF-Y4 of Section 26,Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County,Idaho, and more particularly described as follows; Gornmencing at an Aluminum Cap monument marking the northeast corner of the SE (E%corner) of said Section 25,from which a Brass Cap monument marking the northeast corner of said Section 26 bears North 00026'47" East a distance of 2642.94 feet; Thence North 89°29'05"West along the northerly boundary of said SE'/a a distance of 1320.30 feet to a 6/8 Inch diameter Iron pin marking the southwesterly corner of Merldian Heights No. 3 Subdivision as shown in Book 62 of Flats on Pages 6274 and 6276, Records of Ada County, Idaho, also being the northeast corner of the NW 1/4 of the SE-1a of said Section 26; Thence along the northerly boundary of said NW!of the SE % North 89023'66"West a distance of 765.81 feet to a point on a curve being the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence leaving Bald boundary 119.82 feet along the are of a non-tangent curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 426.00 feet, a delta angle of 16°09'10", and a long chord bearing South 54027106, West a distance of 119.42 feet to a point of tangency; Thence South 46022'33"Vilest a distance of 67.36 feet to a point of curvature; i Thence 66,20 feet along the arc of a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 676.00 feet,a delta angle of 04'46'14', and a long chard bearing South 48°46'40"West a distance of 66.19 feet; Thence North 5164446"West a distance of 263.68 feet to a point on the northerly boundary of the NW 1 of the SE%of Section 26; Thence along sold northerly boundary South 89"23'56"East a distance of 387.33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 0.66 acres, more or less. p,L LAN4 SYR a 11118 X 0'F W i I 140529-WELL.doox Item#11. Proposed Water Line Routing to the Ridenbaugh Canal from Well 32. W ' ��1�� W Tasa D-k „ ..r. .r•r' YVO,vd4land}Rd °l ds�,:a?E0� Paint of Discharge V1 ayr0.�Pf IfSf �k rrt t 1. ¢¢ S EEryry1r ! •, C P. !� ..�h , EF. •a"`�y nti E°{�F 10 I4.Zf „'� �},[5,� '.y1k `-p Rd� Flup,71, � ' A�f �•� � r t` •r �� ld[ .� �1 7 c��, ,k�,c i Vl ��1 l:H�? r} rpr WVerneal CtW'o00 r r c to W Victory{Kid � � •� ,�, p jjj�R;Odosa pr �" �E� �•}�.. a F,°�.� Well 32 t tY r ,.7! 43 [ ' > GyAll All ip �11�y��Fl�ruYy Y zq i Item#11. i Proposed Entry Point to the Ridenbaugh Canal, e F1 a 10 E E z� - i �r Item#11. Section of water line to be modified to discharge into the Ridenbaugh Canal. A 4 _ C c' {! � � 1 1 R t kc 1 7• a� J r r ip fI r1�ti� 3 ! ki e Y" ��n1 r 561. '�a � 1� f �tqt 1 a�+: � • 1�1� + .r '- i v � �gti i {� 51 45ih� 6 w iftykr i - F 6�cy�� t ,3 q IJ 7y cowe � :�iy� iy.t1�1•' t� Item#11. Item#11. C� fIEN , IN4, IDAHG-. MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Sandra Ramirez, Procurement Division Meeting Date: August, 4 2020 Presenter: Sandra Ramirez on behalf of Dennis Teller Estimated Time: 0 Topic: Agreement Between the City of Meridian and Nampa Meridian Irrigation District to Authorize the City to Discharge Water from Well 32 in to the Ridenbaugh Canal for a Designated Period Recommended Council Action: Approve and authorize Procurement Manager, Keith Watts to sign the agreement. Background: The Nampa Meridian Irrigation District agreement is to authorize the City to discharge water into the Ridenbaugh Canal from Well 32 until irrigation season ends (October 2020). The agreement was reviewed by both the City's Legal and Procurement departments and approves to proceed with approval. Item#12. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution No. 20-2221: A Resolution Authorizing the Donation of Surplus Computers and Equipment to the West Ada School District. Item#12. CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 20-2221 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, HOAGLUN, PERREAULT, STRADER A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO, SETTING FORTH CERTAIN FINDINGS AND PURPOSES TO DECLARE SURPLUS PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE DONATION OF CERTAIN COMPUTER AND EQUIPMENT TO THE WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Meridian to declare that a certain computers and equipment as attached in Exhibit"A" as surplus as these particular items are no longer needed or used by the City of Meridian; WHEREAS, the City of Meridian's purchasing policy allows surplus City property to be donated to other agencies exempt from federal income tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code when the value of the property in question is of nominal value, that is, valued at less than the cost of disposing of the property; WHEREAS, the cost of maintaining the computer equipment would result in the unnecessary expenditure of City funds; and WHEREAS, the City of Meridian desires to donate the computer equipment listed in Exhibit "A"to the West Ada School District, which are exempt from federal income tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO,AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Mayor and City Council hereby authorize and declare that certain computers and equipment as attached hereto as Exhibit"A" are, surplus property. Section 2. That the Mayor and City Council hereby authorizes the donation of the computers and equipment listed on Exhibit"A"to the West Ada School District. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 1 Ith day of August, 2020. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this lth day of August, 2020. APPROVED: ATTEST: By: Mayor Robert E. Simison Chris Johnson, City Clerk RESOLUTION FOR THE DONATION OF COMPUTER EQUIPMENT TO THE WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT Item#12. DEPARTMENT E IDIAN information Technology DEPARTMENT CONTACT CITY OF MERIDIAN Stephanie Olendorff PROPERTY INFORMATION FORM CITY TAG# DESCRIPTION LOCATION See attached Computers IT MODEL MANUFACTURER SERIAL/VIN# See attached See attached See Attached ACQUISITION DATE ORIGINAL COST VENDOR LIFESPAN See Attached See attached See attached 5 years Addition (No additional information required) PROPERTY DISPOSAL AUTHORIZATION DISPOSAL METHODS Give a brief description of how you plan on disposing the asset Auction/Sell West Ada School District. X Donation/Transfer Trade In Discard/Recycle "Please remove all identifying logos prior to disposal REASON FOR DISPOSAL OF PROPERTY Items have been decomissioned. CONDITION OF PROPERTY TO BE DISPOSED Poor (� 7/28/20 U� Department Designee Approval Date APPROVED 712$120 By Go tni Kluchen at 12:28 pm,Jul 28,2020 Fin Reviewed Date (IL) 4--- ? aj Mayor Approval U 1 Date FOR FINANCE USE ONLY FA# N/A GL Code: N/A Resolution No.: 20-2221 Approved b Council Date: Y 8-11-2020 Final Disposition of Property: C:\Users\solendorff\Downloads\Property Information and Disposal Request Form_v2016(6) 1 of 2 Item#12. Instructions for submitting Property Disposal Request: A. Department will obtain a signature for approval of Department Designee. B. Send to Finance Department(Accountant)for review and signature. C. Finance(Accountant)will route to Mayor for approval if needed. D. Finance(Accountant)will return a copy of the approved form to the Department so they can proceed with disposal. "The Department will remove all identifying logos prior to disposal. *Any fixed assets that is to be disposed or sold without public notice,public sale,or at auction must be authorized by City Council resolution prior to disposal or sale. a. Finance(Accountant)will send copy of signed disposal request to Legal(Legal Services Support Manager)and Department for Resolution draft. Department will coordinate with Legal(Legal Services Support Manager);add Disposal Form and Resolution draft to next available Council Agenda using Agenda Manager Software. E. The Department will contact the auction company or donating agency to arrange pick up. F. Once the property is disposed of, Finance will note on the form the Final Disposition of Property and will delete item from the Fixed Asset Listing. Departments will note the disposition on their Inventory Listing. G. Finance will notify Legal to remove item from insurance policy See Purchasing Policy for more information See Disposal Flowchart for more information C: Users\solendorff\Downloads\Property Information and Disposal Request Form_v2016(6) 2 of 2 Item#12. �.+ }+ Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U L.7 U V u_ u U U U U U U U U U_U U LL -LLLLL4 � {� L — — — — L L L L L L L L L L LL Y ++ t; VI N 1/1 T Ln !n In N Ln Ln Ln in Ln V1 ✓] N N N N L � L4 C] d ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 0 O 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L t C L -r- .� A L t L L t L = L _C L t L A A L A I-_ L t -0 L L L t -C A U U U U u u U U U U U U U u u u u U U U U U U u U U U U U U U U U V) N LnV) U) U) U) U) Lq U) U) V) V1 U1 U] V) VI (A N V) V) V) V) (n V) VI VI V) V) V) V1 V) V) m m rn m m m m m m m m m m m m m IL m M M is M m m m m m m m m m m m -0 _0 m m m a m -a -a m m m -o v m m -a -0 -o -0 -a -a -0 -a -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -¢ -0 -a a a a a ¢ a a Q a a a a a a ¢ a a a ¢ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a �A U) V) Y Y i VI VI w (n �11 u1 ai a) aj � (1) <n I) a) a) N w N N N a) VI ai w VI VI VI 0) V] VI VI N N a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a) a v v It v v �r �zr v v �t �t t �t �t 'I C 't -t �r er a 't v v 't 't ' C ri ri i-1 -4 r-1 r-1 -A -1 r-1 r-4 r-1 H r-I ri r-I r-I (--I r-I r4 4 ra H (-i c-1 -1 r-1 -4 -1 -1 ri 4 O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 N N N N N N N (V N (N CV N N N fV N fV N [V N N N N rV N N N N N N fV N N ra r-1 r-I r-1 e-I ri ri ri ri ri ri ri ri ri ri ri r-1 r-I r-I .--I r-1 H r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I .--I c-I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r--I ri ri ri ri ri ri ri ra c-1 c-a r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 ri ri ri ri ri ri ri r-I r-I c-I r 4 r-1 r-I r-I r i ri 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 o a a o o a o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n r� n n n n n n n n n n n n n n LD LD W LD LD LO LD LD LD LD LD LD LO LO LO LD LO LD L0 LD LD LD 10 LO LO LO Z lei LO LO LD L0 LD w 00 00 CK) ab o0 co 00 co oo oa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Ib oo co oo 00 cc co 0o 0o co 00 ab rn � rn rn m rn rn m � rn rn a) Q) Q1 p1 O) Ol O1 01 01 0) Ih 0) D) a, T O) Q) a, 0t a, rn rn U a a a a a a a a Ln a a a {/� N a VI O V u u u u u u u u tLDm u u u SL a) v aj c) a v a a u ` a O O O O O O O 0 a O O O m LL LL u. LL LL LL LL '� — — m O m u i a- 0- a- d a- a1 a- a J �C a 0- d a A m m d a a = V Z) Z a a a Y ri M (D oO } ❑ oO Ln r j (� J X � r(-�- d r-i m X O n m N m Z u rr m 7m J } N > N H > > r4 > N r }r r r r } r r r } r r CD0 o O 0 O O 0 a 0 0 O O O O o O CDCDO o o o o O O 0 0 o O O 0 o a 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 o O O o o O O 0 o O o o O o O O o 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 v v v zt -�r v4:r v v a Rr -;I- v * �zr er v er v �r zr v 4:t v v v 4* d' Rr q v � v v v � �r d � �r � � v a a a a a a a a a a ¢ ¢ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N fV fV N N N N N N N iV [V N N N N PV N r-I ri ri ems! r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I H H r A r l r i r i r-1 r-1 r-4 ri ri ri r-I r-I ri r-I ri r-I r-I H (D UI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l7 0 L7 (D U (D 0 LD (D (D (D 0 LD 0 L7 0 L7 L7 0 0 0 L7 (D (D O o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 o a o 0 0 0 o a a o O o 0 0 0 0 o O o o O O o 0 0 o a o W LO l0 LD 1.0 LD 1,0 LD L0 LD LO LD LO CD 1-0 L0 LO LO LO LO LD l0 LD LD LD LO LO LO LD LD LD LO l0 `1 .Y SL SL SG SC SG SL SG Se SG SC SC SC SC SC SC SC X SC SC SC SC SC SC SG .]L SC SC SC SC SC SG Vl N N VI Ln V1 Ln lil VI VI V7 [n Ln to VI VI V] w VI N N N 0 N 0Ll V) u) ✓i VI In Ln a a a a a N a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ai a a a a a a a a (u a a a a -0 -0 m -a m m -a a m -a -a a m -D -0 -a -0 -0 -a -o -0 -o -0 -0 -a -0 -0 -a -0 -0 -0 -0 -a 0 0 o a 0 O 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 O O 0 a O a 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0 0 O n. f1 a s a a- a 0- 0- 0- a m d a a a a cL 11 a a a a- A. 11 a1 0. 0. IL 0_ 0- u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u .J J J J J J J J J J J J a a- a a a a a a a a aZ a a a a a a a d a a a a a a a. Cl- s 0- a a a a Z 2 2 S Z 2 S S S S Z = I = S S 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 S z a SZ a O- O_ a- 0- O- O_ a O_ O_ O_ a a a CL !? a Q a a O_ Q d O_ O_ O_ O_ Q a a. 1Z O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O SG X A SL SC In SC SL .Y Ln In ..SG Ln Y Y Y Y Y `1 X X Ln SL SC SG SC SL SG In Sn V) Y Y VI (/1 y V7 N VI (11 VI (1Y N � (1) (11 (1) VI V1 N V1 lA VI N (!] V) (il 1I'7 VI VI VI in t/1 lA V7 In a N a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a1 a a a a a a a a a a a a ❑ ❑ o a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ d ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ d d i m o o0 a) n Ln n O LD m a) V) oo O n LD oo M C oo ri m m n ri ri r-I �r Ln m N N o m m n c-t m m V) n N fV n rV w N r-I Ln Ln m -�r r-1 V) M W r` M mt n oO oC u) N n Cr CY) 0) 0) O T 0) O 0) O O 0) O 0) O O O O 0 O O o 0) 0) 0) O O 0) O) 0) O O O) O O O O a) O O 0) O m 0) O m O Cl) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) Q) O O a m 0) O 0 O 0) a) O 0l O O O O a O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 0 O O O r1 r-1 H 1-4 r-I r-I r-I -1 1-1 r-1 1 1 ri 1-1 r-I 1-1 T-4 H r-I ri H H H r-1 ri ri r-I r-I r-4 ri ri r-I ri r-I Item#12. U U U U U U U U U U V U V V V U U U ca U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U u .L .L .� .L .` .` .` .` •L .L •L .i •L •� .i •L •L •L •� •` �--' i+ •W 4+ 4•+ Y ++ Y 1r 4t a••' Y +Z ++ ++ Y 4+ i� V N N N N N N N d i•d Y av-+ a-+ Vl in aNnyyLL nA V ay--+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..0 .r_ t L .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 ..� .0 .0 .0 L L L t -C t t L r r = = t = .0 .0 .0 t L = _C = U U V U U u U U u U u u U u U u u u U U U U U V U U U u U U U U U u U v1 v) Ln V/ v] N vl V) v) vl v) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) C4 V) V) to 1A Vl Lo v) v) Vi V) vl vl to to to N m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m a s -a a a a a a a a a Ts -es -o a a a a a a a a a a a -a a a a a a a a •� a ¢ a a ¢ a a a a Q a a a a ¢ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ¢ a ++ �-- i-+ ++ i-+ •1-+ i Y �-+ Y ++ Y +-` ++ ++ ++ 4••- 4--r i-r Y �-- �•+ •1- Y ++ i•+ •W Y+ ++ ++ }= in vl vl v7 vl vl rn 0 in vl 0 0 0 to [n 0 N 0 cn rn v) vl N m vl vl vl 0 0 0 vl vi 0 vl in w w w tit w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w � w w w w w w w w w w w w � d d• It dt cr d' I d d rY �t d d c} -r Cr Cr et d' � Cr CF d Cr C1 � -�t CS � d er Cr H H H r-I ri r-i r-I r-I r1 r'1 e"I r-i r-i r-1 r-I r3 r1 IH ri r't r'i r-i ri r-I ri r•i ri r-I r-t r4 ri r-I r-I r-i O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p a p 0 0 0 p o 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C3 0 N N N CV N N N 04 CV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N iV N CV N N N N N N (V r-1 ri ri rl ri ri t1 r-i ri r-i rl i-f � r-i r-I a--I r-i r-1 r-I rl e--I ri W ri r-I r-t r-1 ri ri � e-! e-i c-i r-I r-i \ O\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 O a O \ \ \ \ \ \ \ c� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C:� o 0 o 0 0 0 O 0 O CD r'i c^^i r-1 r-I r--I r-I r-I r-I r-I r i r-I r-r ri ri r-1 rl r-] ri r-1 r f r-i r-1 r-I ri ri r-I r-i r-I r-I r-i r-i r-I r-I r 4 ri 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o O o 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p O o n r. r. rn rn rn rn r� rn rn rn rn rl� rn r� r� n rl r. rn rn rn rn Il rn r• r� rl r� r r r rl 1l rl tO tD LO tD tD tQ LO U0 LO tO tO tD tD to tD tD tD tD tD Lo tD l0 tb tD tD t0 to tD tD tD tD tD to tD to w w w w 0o w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w m w w w w w w w w w w w w rn m m rn rn m rn rn m rn rn rn m rn rn rn m rn rn m rn m rn a7 rn m a, rn rn rn is a, D� rn rn U_ L L to r� v7 0 w to w �- w w w w w w w w w c cry w w toC w C nco d CD w Y U Y U V U U U U U U U u U M U U U a `- s aaaaaLi a a a t m CL CL z Q. :3 a m T U m m m � a a m > N tD X ❑ to rn tD LL ri vl a CL' co ac m m > z U l) o) rn LL z Ln ❑ LL GC N cr ri N > ri ri {— r-i r q rd N r-I ri ri N N r1 N r O O O 0 O [] p O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O p O O O C) O b O o O C) O O O O O O O o � O o O O O a O O O O O O O C) O O O p O O O O O tr v cr d �r cr er a• a er r �t lr :r cr er v v tr KT �t a a a s a a ¢ a a , a a a a a a Q a a a a a a ¢ a a a a a ¢ a a a N N N N N N N r4 N ry N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ty N N N N tV "I r-I r♦ ri r-i r't r-i ri ri r-1 r-I r-i ri r-1 H r-I r-I r-A ri r-i r-I r-i r-i r-i r-I ri r-I vq r-i r-i r-1 rl r-I r-i r-I 0 U C7 C7 V U lD CJ l7 U` ( C7 C7 ( (D C7 U` C7 C7 C9 lJ' C7 C7 V Q 0 C7 U U' C7 C7 C7 0 0 L 0 0 O O O 0 O O o O 0 0 o O 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 O 0 a O O O O O O O O C7 O 0 0 O 0 O a O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 o O a O O O O O O O O O o cD to Lo to 10 to tD tD t0 tD I'D L.0 tD w t6 tD w tO w tD t0 tD w w tD tD tD to to LO tO LO tD t0 lD Y Y Y 1 Y Y Y ,C Y ,C Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y .]L .]L .l6 ..lL Y Y Y Y rn vS rn W vl m m vl vl ul 0 Ln vl in v1 to N rn VI 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 cm vl vl vl vl 0 in N w w w w w w w w w w w w a w a) w w w a w w w w w w w w w w w w w a, w w a a a a a a a m _0 -a a a -a -o -0 -0 -a -0 -a -0 -a a -a -o -0 a -a a a -a -a -a a -0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L L L i L L L L L L L L L L. L L L L L L L L L L L L 1... F L > f r " L f1 a D_ CL D_ 0_ D. CL CL CL CL. D. 0- D. CL CL. 0- a. f- CL a a. a 0. CL. CL 0. 4 D- tL 4 13� d 0- d u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u J 1 J 1 1 1 .J 1 1 1 1 1 J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .J d d a d D_ 0_ D. D_ d D. d D.. a. CL CL D. CL in. CL CL ia. f1 CL a 0- 0- Cl- CL a. 0. 4. 0- a. 0- CL a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0_ a a a a 0. 0. 0. ❑. 0_ a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � .L � � � SG ,C Y ,C �L Y aG _SC = bd `e .X .X Y .X .X .?C -14 ..X � � � � Y Y Y � Y Y .X vl to vy w [n to 0 rn rn rn rn v) to rn N 0 In rn N 0 vt v5 vl vl Ln rn vl n Sn vi m m vl vl N w w w w w as w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ m w N N 0 m ri m w to m :r er M w d' 1.0 N cr Ln N to w w rn N rn to r-1 o r, Ln 0 r-I o 1� M M M N W t.0 tD M Cr M r- Ln M N d• M M ¢r rt w N M r•;r• w N M N w w r• 0 M Ln O m O O O O m m m m Co O m O m 0 O m m 0 O O'1 O O 0 m O o O m O m o m O m 0 m m m m O 0 0 0 (T CS) O O 0 Ol M O 0 D) (h 0 Ot 0) m O O) m m O O O r-I o Cr) O C) O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ri r-i r-i r-I r-i r-I ri rH r•i ri r-t rd H r-I r-i r-i ri ri ri 14 ri r-3 ri a-I ri r-1 1-1 r-€ r-I r-i r-1 r-i r-i r-i H Item#12. u cj ca c� u u u v u u u c2 LJ 2 cJ u Y LJ ca 2 u u u u u In V, fn VI Sn VI V, N N VI VS L L N N N N N [il [n L 9n L VS V, 0 0 '0 0 •0 0 Q 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •0 0 0 0 0 •a o 0 0 O O O O O O a a a a a a O a a a s O O O o O a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u u V u V U U U u U u U U u V U U u u u u u u U U V1 V1 V1 V) V1 V1 Ln V] Vn to V} LO V1 VI V] V7 VI V) V1 to to VT Vi VY V7 a a a a a a a ¢ a a a a a a a a Q a a a a a a a a N m 0 a, 0 11 N N N Q7 N N Ul 01 N 0 0 N N V� Ln N d 0 3 3 3� 39 3: 3: 3: 3: er r v �r d � dI d• d• v d d• d• d• d• H H H H H H H H H ri 11 O O O O O o o O O O O O o O O O O O 0 C} O O o O 0 N N N N CV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N fV N N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ H H H H H H r-S ri r-I r-1 T-I e-E H �i H H H r-i H H H 0 o O o 0 0 0 o a o o a a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `-' H H H H H H H H H H i` r` n i` n i` n 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 `0 00 coo coo coo 00 g o a us o ci Ln In Ln ui cn en un ui o m Ln Ln ui ui ui LA rn rn rn rn rn al rn Ln v) Ln v) ui u1 to un un ul Ln Ln Ln ui u1 en u7 ci H H H H H H H H ri ri ri rV H H H H cn x - L O O CL a. 4_ 0 to O O to 01 vy 6. d CL "0a. "0 LJ.. + LL u u .0 •n CL CL N J •U U_ 7 a a a- m d- U oo r. d N X r, N m Y m Ln u z u N x >" >- 'j � x x ?� x � x N ?y } 00 O o d o O O o m N N N N N N N N N N rl N N N N N N 0 O 0 O O 0 0 d• e-i -1 H H H H H i-i H t i -1 ch d d d O d Id' ct d d d d ct d d C d d d• d' d' d• d- d• CL d' d• d' :t Ct d• d' d' d' d• d• d• kt d' ct a a a a a Q a Y U 0 (7 0 l] (g (g V` C'J (� (a 00 (9 0 ca 0 n D _ D D � u u u u u u u u u u u u u u U u u N N N N " N N Y Ln u7 u1 w In Ln to u1 u") Ln u1 o m m m Ln V1 O m d O O 0 Co O O c tD o O o O O O 0 0 0 O o O O O 0 O o d O O O o O o ti, Ln m Ln Ln m u) ui Ln ul u7 tow) u7 Ln cn en u1 LD w lD CD to lO O (J a lfl LO CO tD lfl tO tD iD W to tQ l0 O tD w W LD �L �G _1C �G SC Y �C •0 2 Y Y Y .X -114 .aC -C Ln Ln en en V) V, N L O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 'o u 4J aJ 07 W N m O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O a u m CO CO CD m m m m m m m m m m m m m L L L L L L 0 (p O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 (1. 0- ♦L IL D, Q. L L L L L L L L L L L L L L _ Ln a ❑_ o_ or a_ a cL a a a IL a C7 u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u J J J J J J J O J _, J J J J J J J J J ...J ...J J J J J z > > > > > > > 4) CL a a a D_ ILQ_ Q CL a a CA- 0- a CL CL D_ CL a CLCL CL CL a D_ Q a. a a a a a a t� a a. 0. iz O_ a a a a a a a a a a a O O O 0 O O O -O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O 0 Lm V) Ln w U) ul D_ CL 0- CL CL CL a a a a a a a a a a a a N OJ 03 07 w a1 N - m m N f0 @ f6 (G m ro (V m m m m m m m d � [h Ln m 0 M d• ct Ln W) m N m 0 d' H m d• to tO m w m O i` to m m d• w m ul O I- 00 l0 i` i` t0 r� 00 ♦` m n f` o O r� n H lfl M O o d O O O a O O O O O O O O O O O o O O o O o O o o 0 d 0 0 Z O o o o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o Ln o o m 0 H H ri i-i r-I H H Y H H H H H H H i-i H H H H a--I H ri H e-i O Item#13. (:> E IDIAN*-----, AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution No. 20-2222: A Resolution Authorizing the Fifth Continuance of a Local Disaster Emergency Declaration And Its Terms for an Additional Thirty (30) Days; Authorizing the Continued Immediate Expenditure of Public Money to Safeguard Life, Health and Property; and Providing an Effective Date. ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-102941 BOISEIDAHO Pgs=2 NIKOLA OLSON 08/12/2020 02:49 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE RESOLUTION NO. 20-2222 BY THE COUNCIL: BERNT,BORTON, CAVENER, HOAGLUN,PERREAULT, STRADER A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE FIFTH CONTINUANCE OF A LOCAL DISASTER EMERGENCY DECLARATION AND ITS TERMS FOR AN ADDITIONAL THIRTY (30) DAYS; AUTHORIZING THE CONTINUED IMMEDIATE EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC MONEY TO SAFEGUARD LIFE,HEALTH AND PROPERTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19)pandemic continues to represent an imminent threat to the life,health, and property of the City of Meridian and its citizens; and WHEREAS, a local disaster emergency, as defined in Section 46-1002, Idaho Code, continues to be in existence in the City of Meridian due to the imminent threat to life and property; and WHEREAS,pursuant to the authority granted in Section 46-1011, Idaho Code,the Mayor of the City of Meridian, on March 16,2020, declared a local disaster emergency; and WHEREAS, on March 17,2020 the City Council of the City of Meridian passed Resolution 20- 2195 ratifying the Mayor's Declaration and authorizing the continuance of the local disaster emergency declaration for a period of thirty (30) days; and WHEREAS, on April 14, 2020 the City Council of the City of Meridian passed Resolution 20-2203 -authorizing the continuance of the local disaster emergency declaration for an additional thirty(30) days; and WHEREAS, on May 12t", 2020 the City Council of the City of Meridian passed Resolution 20-2210 authorizing the continuance of the local disaster emergency declaration for an additional thirty(30) days; and WHEREAS, on June 9h,2020 the City Council of the City of Meridian passed Resolution 20-2214 authorizing the continuance of the local disaster emergency declaration for an additional thirty (30) days; and WHEREAS, on July 14 th 2020,the City Council of the City of Meridian passed Resolution 20-2216 authorizing the continuance of the local disaster emergency declaration for an additional thirty(30) days; and WHEREAS, it is deemed necessary by the Council of the City of Meridian to extend such local disaster emergency declaration for an additional thirty(30) days to provide for the ongoing response to the COVID-19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, Section 67-2808, Idaho Code, authorizes the Council of the City of Meridian to declare an emergency authorizing the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life,health or property; and RESOLUTION REAUTHORIZING DECLARATION OF LOCAL DISASTER EMERGENCY Page 1 Item#13. WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Meridian deems it necessary for the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Meridian to continue the authorization for the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health and property; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO: Section 1. That the Declarations of Local Disaster Emergency pursuant to Resolutions 20-2195, 20- 2203, 20-2210, 20-2214, and 20-2216 shall remain in effect for an additional period of thirty(30) days from the effective date of this Resolution unless terminated, modified or unless extended for thirty(30) day increments. Section 2. That the continued immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard the life, health and property of the City of Meridian is hereby authorized for an additional thirty(30) day increment. Section 3. That this Resolution shall be effective on August 14, 2020, and shall establish an uninterrupted period of Emergency Declaration from March 17, 2020 through midnight on September 12, 2020. Section 4. That this resolution shall supersede and void all other resolutions, orders, or parts thereof that may conflict herewith. Section 5. That a copy of this resolution shall be promptly filed with the Ada County Recorder. ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 1 lth day of August 2020. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, this 1 lth day of August 2020. ATTEST: Robert E. Simison Chris Johnson Mayor City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) On this I Ith day of August 2020,before me,a Notary Public,personally appeared Robert E.Simison and Chris Johnson, known or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City,and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: Meridian, Idaho Commission expires: 3-28-2022 Item#14. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: AP Invoices for Payment- 07-30-20 - $6,225.85 Item#14. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund IDAHO CHILD SUPPORT RECEIPTING Case#251042 B.Caldwell Child Support July 2020 363.00 01 General Fund IDAHO CHILD SUPPORT RECEIPTING Case#262519 T.Bryner Child Support July 2020 1,174.00 01 General Fund IDAHO CHILD SUPPORT RECEIPTING Case#311213 M.Payne Child Support July 2020 317.00 01 General Fund IDAHO CHILD SUPPORT RECEIPTING Case#321962 M.Gould Child Support July 2020 821.71 Total 01 General Fund 2,675.71 60 Enterprise IDAHO CHILD SUPPORT RECEIPTING Case#310074 B.Besson Child Support July 2020 400.00 Fund 60 Enterprise IDAHO CHILD SUPPORT RECEIPTING Case#326566 N.Howell Child Support July 2020 299.00 Fund 60 Enterprise IDAHO CHILD SUPPORT RECEIPTING Case#344238 B,Kerr Child Support July 2020 443.00 Fund 60 Enterprise IDAHO CHILD SUPPORT RECEIPTING Case#352719 B.Arte Child Support July 2020 349.00 Fund 60 Enterprise IDAHO CHILD SUPPORT RECEIPTING Case#352975 B.Blake Child Support July 2020 641.65 Fund 60 Enterprise IDAHO CHILD SUPPORT RECEIPTING Case#354376 M.Edwards Child Support July 2020 221.64 Fund 60 Enterprise IDAHO CHILD SUPPORT RECEIPTING Case#412750 D. Patton Child Support July 2020 604.20 Fund 60 Enterprise IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION Letter ID#L1704547008 D.Heaton #2375605 591.65 Fund Total 60 Enterprise 3,550.14 Fund Report Total 6,225.85 Date:7/30/20 02:13:47 PM Page:1 Item#15. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: AP Invoices for Payment- 07-31-20 - $138,886.09 Item#15. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund ADA COUNTY PARAMEDICS 220/6 CPR&6 First Aid cards,CPR program,city 240.00 training 01 General Fund ADA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE Phone Translation Service June 2020 34.77 01 General Fund AFLAC July 2020 AFLAC 3,855.76 01 General Fund ASHLEY HORVATH Per Diem:A.Horvath Pendleton,0R,SRO Training, 302.50 8/2/20-8/7/20 01 General Fund AT&T MOBILITY LLC ATT First Net invoice 06/21-07/20/20 635.50 01 General Fund BOE-Boise Office Equipment XPN547404 Copier usage 6/22-7/21/2020(Xerox 1,233.38 8N298) 01 General Fund CENTURYLINK CENTREX phone lines, Homecourt, FS#1 07/17- 732.82 8/18/20 01 General Fund D&B SUPPLY Dog Food for K9 Tuso 44.99 01 General Fund D&B SUPPLY Dog Food for Tuso 44.99 01 General Fund IAFF LOCAL 4627 #4627 Firefighters Dues July 2020 7,260.03 01 General Fund IDAHO DEPARTMENT of LABOR #0007001746 2nd Qtr 2020 Unemployment 15,137.90 01 General Fund IDAHO POWER Fire Department Power- July 2020 3,496.03 01 General Fund JARED HAUSTVEIT Per Diem:J.Haustveit Pend leton,OR,SROTraining, 302.50 8/2/20-8/7/20 01 General Fund JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE 20-0054 Sprinkler Test and Inspect Fire Safety Center 159.00 PROTECTION LP 01 General Fund KB PRINTS Police Academy Shirts 363.00 01 General Fund LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC. Level 3 Communications Telephone,6/17-8/16/20 1,000.33 268238 01 General Fund M2M WIRELESS Parks Modem Service 06/17-07/16/20 Qty 32 364.23 01 General Fund NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT July 2020 Pre Tax Contributions 457 43,358.81 SOLUTIONS,INC 01 General Fund NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT July 2020 ROTH Contributions 13,151.52 SOLUTIONS,INC 01 General Fund THE UPS STORE Postage to Send Evidence to Lab 59.77 01 General Fund UNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY #17426 July 2020 Contributions 143.34 01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. 965467287-00001 Data Plan #1,6/21 -7/20/20 2,046.68 BELLEVUE 01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. 965467287-00002 Cellphones-6/21 -7/20/20 8,825.04 BELLEVUE 01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. 965467287-00003 Data Plan #2-6/21 -7/20/20 1,004.55 BELLEVUE 01 General Fund VISION SERVICE PLAN Client#30044489-July 2020 Premiums 4,558.34 01 General Fund WSCFF EMPLOYEE BENEFIT TRUST July 2020 MERP Contributions 8,200.00 Total 01 General Fund 116,555.78 Date:7/31/20 11:51:58 AM Page:1 Item#15. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise AFLAC July 2020 AFLAC 547.40 Fund 60 Enterprise CENTURYLINK CENTREX phone lines, Homecourt, FS#1 07/17- 624.00 Fund 8/18/20 60 Enterprise IDAHO DEPARTMENT of LABOR #0007001746 2nd Qtr 2020 Unemployment 78.87 Fund 60 Enterprise IDAHO POWER 2225423496 WWTP McDermott&McMillan Sewer Lift 4,469.56 Fund 7/20 60 Enterprise JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE 20-0054 Fire Alarm Monitoring Blackrock Booster St.to 45.83 Fund PROTECTION LP 6/30 60 Enterprise MY RENT LLC REFUND WT/S/T: 4664 N DYVER AVE RENTER AND 34.21 Fund PROP MGMT PAID FI 60 Enterprise NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT July 2020 Pre Tax Contributions 457 5,732.81 Fund SOLUTIONS,INC 60 Enterprise NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT July 2020 ROTH Contributions 2,681.87 Fund SOLUTIONS,INC 60 Enterprise UNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY #17426 July 2020 Contributions 35.00 Fund 60 Enterprise VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. 965467287-00001 Data Plan #1, 6/21 -7/20/20 3,451.40 Fund BELLEVUE 60 Enterprise VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. 965467287-00002 Cellphones-6/21 -7/20/20 2,868.80 Fund BELLEVUE 60 Enterprise VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. 965467287-00003 Data Plan #2-6/21 -7/20/20 136.60 Fund BELLEVUE 60 Enterprise VISION SERVICE PLAN Client#30044489-July 2020 Premiums 1,623.96 Fund Total 60 Enterprise 22,330.31 Fund Report Total 138,886.09 Date:7/31/20 11:51:58 AM Page:2 Item#16. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: AP Invoices for Payment- 08-12-20 - $546,760.96 Item#16. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund ADVANCE AUTO PARTS edger belt for Storey Park-qty 2 8.37 01 General Fund ADVANCE AUTO PARTS grommets for dump trailer-qty 1 4.16 01 General Fund ADVANCE AUTO PARTS hydraulic oil for ball field groomer-qty 1 48.75 01 General Fund ADVANCE AUTO PARTS spark plugs for mule#5-qty 3 10.77 01 General Fund ADVANCE AUTO PARTS spark plugs for small engines-qty 7 16.94 01 General Fund ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS H&I BOB REFUND: SUMMER EVENT CANCELLED DUE TO COVID 300.00 RECORDS 01 General Fund AUTOMATED OFFICE SYSTEMS Kyocera Cs5053ci click fees 6/14-7/13/20; SN 004635 237.45 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Atreetlight Repair for Pole#29322B on 144.00 7/20/20 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair for Pole#29531C on 558.55 7/20/20 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole# 10808 on 7/20/20 65.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole#30146C on 7/20/20 238.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole#30164C on 7/20/20 94.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole#40814C on 7/20/20 284.50 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole#40941C on 7/20/20 196.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole# 51600C on 7/20/20 54.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole# 52663C on 7/20/20 65.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole# 52664C on 7/20/20 65.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 Streetlight Repair Pole#5714B on 7/20/20 129.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. NO PO Stlt Repair Pole#40011C Damage Claim 8,864.00 01 General Fund BOE-Boise Office Equipment CN28973-01 220/ Maint. Fee Charged per copy 130.21 6/25-7/24/20 01 General Fund BOISE FITNESS EQUIPMENT Repair BH Treadmill—City Hall Gym 45.00 01 General Fund BOISE SOFTBALL UMPIRES ASSOC. 20-0231 softball umpires 7/13-7/17/20-qty 46 games 1,329.40 01 General Fund BOISE SOFTBALL UMPIRES ASSOC. 20-0231 softball umpires 7/20-7/24/20-qty 50 games 1,445.00 01 General Fund BOISE SOFTBALL UMPIRES ASSOC. 20-0231 softball umpires 7/6-7/10/20-qty 49 games 1,522.81 01 General Fund BRANDON MEDICA Education Reimbursement B.Medica 3an-May2020 1,050.00 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Alignment for Unit# 11 63.00 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Battery for Unit# 144 162.00 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC HVAC Blower Motor&Resistor for Unit# 160 377.72 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Vehicle#1 Maintenance/Tire Rotation&Oil Change 54.99 C20826 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Vehicle#7 Maintenance/Tire Rotation&Oil Change 54.99 C21130 01 General Fund BSN SPORTS,INC. volleyball storage rack-qty 3 278.95 01 General Fund BUILDING BLOCKS IDAHO imstructor fee-Lego EV3 Mindstorm Battle Bots 780.00 7/20-7/24/20 01 General Fund CINTAS First Aid Kit Maintenance 165.38 Date:8/4/20 01:22:55 PM Page:1 Item#16. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund CITY OF BOISE ATTORNEYS OFFICE PO# 20-0032 FY20 Pros&Criminal Legal Services 41,844.02 August 2020 01 General Fund D&B SUPPLY Dog Food for K9 Tuso 89.98 01 General Fund D&B SUPPLY work boots for J Aldrich-city 1 pair 167.99 01 General Fund DAVID EPLEY&ASSOCIATES Paint wall after Window Reseal, North Stairwell 1,775.00 01 General Fund DISTINCTIVE MILLWORK&SPEC Repaired Laminate Counters @ PSTC 381.00 01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO 150 SYL F032/835/Eco Octron Flou 21779 300.00 01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO 220/Balasts(5),Sta. 5,Building Mntc 95.95 01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO 30 SYL F032/835/Eco Octron Flou 21779 180.00 01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO 60 SYL F032/835/Eco Octron Flou 21779 120.00 01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO photo cell for Lanark Parks Shop-city 2 41.05 01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER Battery Isolator for SWAT Van Unit#37 56.99 SERVICES,INC. 01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER Power Distribution Relay Replaced,Wiring Repair#522 131.25 SERVICES,INC. 01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER Prisoner Seatbelts Replaced 418.48 SERVICES,INC. 01 General Fund FIRE&ICE POTTERY STUDIO canvas painting camp activity-qty 27 295.00 01 General Fund FIRE&ICE POTTERY STUDIO Siena canvas painting class for summer camp-city 27 295.00 01 General Fund FOUR SEASONS SPA&POOL REFUND: MOVIE NIGHT SPONSORSHIP CANCELLED 535.00 DUE TO COVID 01 General Fund FREDERICK L SCOTT New Hire Police Academy Training Role Player 112.50 01 General Fund GEM STATE PAPER&SUPPLY CO 20-0018 20 cs enmotion towels 1,031.00 01 General Fund GEM STATE PAPER&SUPPLY CO hand sanitizer-city 3 cases 140.70 01 General Fund GEM STATE PAPER&SUPPLY CO No PO 10 cs Purell Advanced hand sanitizers 8 oz 457.20 bottles 01 General Fund GLASS DOCTOR Rock Chip Repair for Unit# 105 39.95 01 General Fund GLASS DOCTOR Rock Chip Repair for Unit# 20 39.95 01 General Fund GRAINGER 220/Janitorial,Sta. 6-Spray Bottles(4) 40.52 01 General Fund GRAINGER 220/mop,dust pan, handle,broom,janitorial 143.68 01 General Fund GRAINGER 220/wasp spray, brush,shop supplies 11.03 01 General Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY credit on overcharge reference invoice I5525686 (18.00) 01 General Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY Hunter PGJ sprinklers for Heroes Park-city 25 239.50 01 General Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY irrigation PVC couplings for Tully Park-city 50 18.00 01 General Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY PVC couplings for Tully Park(overcharged) 18.00 01 General Fund HACH COMPANY chlorine analyzer parts&reagents for Generations 843.17 Plaza x 9 01 General Fund HACH COMPANY sulfuric acid for Generations Plaza-city 1 24.12 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 220/Workbench project,Sta. 1 30.10 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Supplies to Attach Bean Bag Mag to Rifle Mount 8.19 Date:8/4/20 01:22:55 PM Page:2 Item#16. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund HORIZON DISTRIBUTORS INC sprinkler head trimmer-city 3 100.47 01 General Fund IDAHO HUMANE SOCIETY 20-0057 FY20 ID Humane Society Animal Cont Services 43,378.00 AUG. 20 01 General Fund IDALOHA INC 20-0172 pay#2 for curtain divider materials, labor, 22,412.78 install 01 General Fund INTERMOUNTAIN DESIGN, INC desktop for workstation #2 386.64 01 General Fund INTERMOUNTAIN DESIGN,INC Furniture Credit for Faulty Drawer (125.00) 01 General Fund JAYKER WHOLESALE NURSERY discount credit reference invoice 000015873 (124.72) 01 General Fund JAYKER WHOLESALE NURSERY discount credits for tree purchases (824.09) 01 General Fund JAYKER WHOLESALE NURSERY trees for Keith Bird Legacy Park-qty 10 2,556.50 01 General Fund JEFF YARNALL REFUND: MOVIE NIGHT SPONSORSHIP CANCELLED 2,250.00 DUE TO COVID 01 General Fund JENNIFER POTCHER New Hire Police Academy Training Role Player 112.50 01 General Fund JENSEN BELTS ASSOC 20-0286 prof svcs S Slough Path design development 16,101.25 7/13/20 01 General Fund KATHRYN GRACE MARTIN New Hire Police Academy Training Role Play 112.50 01 General Fund KB FABRICATION&WELDING INC. 220/Fire Education Van rack,welded to vehicle 295.00 VIN464545 01 General Fund KB FABRICATION&WELDING INC. 220/workbench project,ST. 1, bldg mtnc 480.63 01 General Fund KNIGHT TECHNOLOGY GROUP& 20-0319 Cisco Catalyst 3850-12XS-E Switch-L3- 16,442.26 KATELYN MCLEOD Managed,Ci 01 General Fund L.N.CURTIS AND SONS 220/Pants(1)-Fedrizzi 85.00 01 General Fund L.N.CURTIS AND SONS Field Force Equipment 910.40 01 General Fund LASASCO INC. Laptop Mount for Crimes Car&a Spare Mount 219.00 01 General Fund LAWN CO MAINTENANCE misc sprinkler repairs&pest spraying at contracted 1,580.01 sites 01 General Fund LAWN CO MAINTENANCE tree plantings at Keith Bird Legacy Park-qty 10 1,500.00 01 General Fund LAWN EQUIPMENT COMPANY Fuller Park Hustler mower belt-qty 1 90.88 01 General Fund LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER Storey Park Grasshopper tire repair 45.49 01 General Fund LIFEMED SAFETY,INC 220/AED for New Pub Ed Van 1,951.70 01 General Fund LOWE'S 220/tools for Public Ed Van 10.88 01 General Fund LUCKY J EXCAVATION Weed Abatement for 3626 E. Presidential 325.00 01 General Fund MERIDIAN VETERINARY CLINIC Medication for K9 KB 63.50 01 General Fund METROQUIP,INC. hose fittings for Discovery Park pressure washer-qty 3 16.09 01 General Fund MINUTEMAN,INC. 220/Keys for aquired structure(3) 7.50 01 General Fund MINUTEMAN, INC. broken key repair on chase door at Kleiner Park 105.00 01 General Fund MOTIONS DANCE STUDIO instructor fee-Princess,Mermaid,Unicorn,FairyDance 60.00 7/13-7/17 01 General Fund NEW HORIZON ACADEMY REFUND: MOVIE NIGHT SPONSORSHIP CANCELLED 535.00 DUE TO COVID Date:8/4/20 01:22:55 PM Page:3 Item#16. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Badge holders city 5; Notebooks-2 packs 37.55 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. batteries city.6 packs 54.50 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Keyboard/Mouse combo-2; dry earse markers-3; 59.33 legal pads 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Office Supplies/Planning Keyboard M Carson;Com Dev 75.20 Inventory 01 General Fund OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 220/Replaced Coils on door on East side 237.20 01 General Fund RESERVE ACCOUNT 20474979 Postage Use,July 2020 1,118.30 01 General Fund REVVED UP MOTORSPORTS Front Brakes&Front Tire for Unit#522 241.99 01 General Fund ROCKY MTN TOWING Evidence Tow, DR# 20-4296 117.50 01 General Fund ROCKY MTN TOWING Unit 142 Breakdown,tow to Bruneel 67.50 01 General Fund ROGERS TIRE PROS AND AUTO CARE Front End Alignment 85.00 01 General Fund SAFEBUILT LLC 20-0095 Bldg&Mech Plan Review 6/2020 126,901.86 01 General Fund SALT LAKE WHOLESALE SPORTS 20-0344 FY20 2nd Ammunition order 7,522.36 01 General Fund SILVER CREEK SUPPLY IQ cell cartridges for all parks-qty 12 905.52 01 General Fund SILVER CREEK SUPPLY sprinklers for various parks-qty 36 1,059.84 01 General Fund SMITH POWER PRODUCTS INC 220/MF040 Coolant leak 106.00 01 General Fund STEELMAN PLUMBING Water Line Leak Repair @ K9 Building 1,582.00 01 General Fund STERLING LANDSCAPE DESIGN& tree pruning maintenance for Fire Station#2-qty 1 hr 1,200.00 CONSTRUCTION 01 General Fund SUNROC CORPORATION road mix for Kleiner Park pathways-qty 43.34 tons 554.20 01 General Fund T-ZERS SHIRT SHOP,INC I38 shirts with logo and 2 black down coats 1,040.00 01 General Fund Tami J Leach instructor fee-Pickleball 6/25-7/16/20-qty 4 288.00 01 General Fund TATES RENTS(GENERAL OFFICE) trencher for Tully Park 7/14/20 75.00 01 General Fund TEX TRAIL box trailer u-bolts&spring bolts-qty 13 14.10 01 General Fund TEX TRAIL leaf springs for blue trailer-qty 2 29.02 01 General Fund TREASURE VALLEY STEEL,INC. metal for Bear Creek Park dugout roofs-qty 55 ft 118.25 01 General Fund TREASURE VALLEY TENNIS instructor fee-Tennis 7/7-7/16/20-qty 78 1,996.80 ASSOCIATION 01 General Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE FICA Third Party STD Benefit Payment Qtr Ending 347.25 06/30/20 01 General Fund USSSOA 20-0048 volleyball officials for games 7/13-7/17/20- 843.41 qty 37 01 General Fund USSSOA 20-0048 volleyball officials for games 7/20-7/24/20- 889.00 qty 39 01 General Fund USSSOA 20-0048 volleyball officials for games 7/6-7/10/20-qty 911.79 40 01 General Fund VERMEER ROCKY MOUNTAIN,INC. pole saw parts-qty 4 127.80 01 General Fund VERMEER ROCKY MOUNTAIN,INC. stump grinder for various parks 7/14/20 200.00 01 General Fund VICTORY GREENS sod for Fuller Park-qty 30 SF 8.70 Date:8/4/20 01:22:55 PM Page:4 Item#16. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund VIKING INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS tank lid for mobile pressure washer-city 1 39.09 01 General Fund WEIDNER&ASSOCIATES 220/20 Streamlight Survivor lights, 2 charge cords 1,989.92 01 General Fund WIMAN CORPORATION dog waste bags-city 511,980 10,242.62 01 General Fund YESCO flagpole repairs at Tully Park 2,536.82 01 General Fund YOUNG REMBRANDTS instructor fee-African Safari, Drawing/Cartoon 1,152.00 7/13-17/20 Total 01 General Fund 344,584.85 60 Enterprise ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT 19-0303,19-0410 ACHD-Linder-Ustick-McMillian Svc to 7,748.97 Fund 7/22/20 60 Enterprise ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT 20-0243 ACHD-Meridian-Cherry-Ustick Util.Impvmt Svc 59,152.46 Fund 2/13/20 60 Enterprise AIR FILTER SUPERSTORE WHOLESALE HVAC Filters for Well Sites,Qty 16 76.24 Fund LLC 60 Enterprise AIR FILTER SUPERSTORE WHOLESALE HVAC Filters for Well Sites,Qty 6 27.18 Fund LLC 60 Enterprise AQUA-AEROBIC SYSTEMS,INC Drive wheel for filter 3 stock(1 city) 675.41 Fund 60 Enterprise BADGER CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION Concrete Prep Work for Overland Rd,WO#302589 1,800.00 Fund LLC 60 Enterprise BADGER CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION Concrete Work for Hickory Aveneue Mainbreak, 4,500.00 Fund LLC WO#299703 60 Enterprise BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Land Development Vehicle Maintenance/Oil Change 49.99 Fund C14420 60 Enterprise CAROLYN&LANE CORLESS REFUND WT/S/T: 368 E MOSKEE ST CUSTOMER PAID 37.67 Fund AFTER CLOSING 60 Enterprise CARRIER CORP Labor&parts to repair HVAC boiler 2 in Admin bldg 1,505.00 Fund (11 hrs) 60 Enterprise CDW GOVERNMENT Laptop mount 255.93 Fund 60 Enterprise COMMERCIAL TIRE 4 tires&wheel balance for D. Heaton vehicle, PIP05, 565.48 Fund C18640 60 Enterprise COMMERCIAL TIRE 4 tires&wheel balance, LOF 5W30 oil B.Standley 721.94 Fund PIP07 60 Enterprise COMMERCIAL TIRE Tire and blance for M.Jones vehicle,PIP01,C19841 213.74 Fund 60 Enterprise CORE&MAIN LP Brass Nipple,Qty 4,WO#302590 25.32 Fund Date:8/4/20 01:22:55 PM Page:5 Item#16. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise CORE&MAIN LP PVC flange&coupler for TWAS pipe repair(3 qty) 138.30 Fund 60 Enterprise D&B SUPPLY Pressure/Flow Gauge Assembly Kits,Qty 13 105.86 Fund 60 Enterprise D&B SUPPLY Removable Trailer Jack Sand Shoe,Side Wind Afram 44.78 Fund 50001b 60 Enterprise DUBOIS CHEMICALS INC 20-0002 Ferric chloride(43,240 Ibs) 7,394.04 Fund 60 Enterprise DUBOIS CHEMICALS INC 20-0009 Defoarmer tote(2,200 Ibs) 2,640.00 Fund 60 Enterprise EDGE ANALYTICAL,INC. IPDES testing(1 test) 194.00 Fund 60 Enterprise EDGE ANALYTICAL,INC. IPDES Testing (2 tests) 223.00 Fund 60 Enterprise ESTATE OF LAWRENCE SWISHER C/O REFUND WT/S/T: 2929 N BOULDER CREEK AVE 38.40 Fund NORA SWISHER CUSTOMER PAID AFTER 60 Enterprise ESTATE OF LINDA ALLEN REFUND WT/S/T: 2356 N AMETHYST AVE TITLE 37.67 Fund COMPANY OVERPAID 60 Enterprise EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL LLC PO#20-0019,OCCT Pilot Study @ Well 19 922.00 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. Bushing,Coupler,Adapter,Victory Injection Relocate, 27.17 Fund Qty 3 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. Couplers,Grundfos Pump Head,Qty 6 3,767.76 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. Dbl Hex Nipple, Hydrant Meter Parts,Qty 10 309.60 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. Grate lid for manhole in front of Collections garage(1 139.04 Fund qty) 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. PO#20-0309,3in Hydrant Meter, Replacement Meters, 4,135.44 Fund Qty 3 60 Enterprise FIRE EXTINGUISHER CO FY20 Extinguisher Annual Inspection 1,036.00 Fund 60 Enterprise FISHER SCIENTIFIC Eye wash refill bottles,weigh boats(8 qty) 308.14 Fund 60 Enterprise GRAINGER Camlok coupler&antifreeze injector cleaner(6 qty) 73.26 Fund 60 Enterprise GRAINGER Freezer packs(2 qty) 35.28 Fund 60 Enterprise HACH COMPANY Calibration standard for turbidimeter(1 qty) 410.04 Fund Date:8/4/20 01:22:55 PM Page:6 Item#16. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise HACH COMPANY Mono-Chlor, F&T Ammonia,Dissolved 781.38 Fund Iron,Orthphosphate Chemkey 60 Enterprise HACH COMPANY Nitrate test kits(4 city) 244.98 Fund 60 Enterprise IDAHO POWER 2202131047,WWTP Power-July 2020 54,975.95 Fund 60 Enterprise IDAHO POWER 2205167097 WWTP Power-Liftstations-JULY 2020 4,499.31 Fund 60 Enterprise IDAHO TOOL&EQUIPMENT Hammer,Chisel,Sckt Set,Chain Vise,Pipe Wrnch,Qty 8 821.93 Fund 60 Enterprise DOSE DE LEON REFUND WT/S/T: 4943 W CHARLES ST TITLE 77.48 Fund COMPANY OVERPAID 60 Enterprise JUB ENGINEERS 19-0373 ACHD-Eagle-Amity-Victory Water Impvmt Svc 5,408.30 Fund to 6/30/20 60 Enterprise JUB ENGINEERS 20-0215 Well 31 Water Treatment Facility-Concept D 1,213.30 Fund FINAL 60 Enterprise KELLER ASSOCIATES,INC. 20-0053 Well 18 Water Trtmt Svc to 6/30/20 4,363.75 Fund 60 Enterprise LAWN CO MAINTENANCE Pruning trees&leave cleanup at Landing&McCaile 135.00 Fund 60 Enterprise LAYNE of IDAHO,INC. No PO Well 17 Water Treatment Pump&Motor Pull 2,500.00 Fund Svc 6/30/20 60 Enterprise MADDYN HOMES LLC REFUND: WARRANTY SURETY DEPOSIT HAMELIN 4,557.00 Fund VILLAGE 60 Enterprise MARK ANDERSON reimburse M.Anderson CDL License Class A test fee 260.00 Fund 60 Enterprise McCALL INDUSTRIAL Elbow,nipple,coupling,&bushing (24 city) 138.72 Fund 60 Enterprise McCALL INDUSTRIAL SS ball valves,elbows, nipple, bell reducers,(64 city) 614.52 Fund 60 Enterprise METROQUIP,INC. Hydrant Flow Control Valve,Qty 8 260.32 Fund 60 Enterprise METROQUIP,INC. Swival joint, nozzles,overhaul kit,descaling head(18 2,201.72 Fund city) 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Epoxy for repairing diesel tanks(8 city) 727.01 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Gloves(17 city)&HVAC air filters(11 city) 801.59 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Grease fittings for grit room valves(3 city) 117.87 Fund Date:8/4/20 01:22:55 PM Page:7 Item#16. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Polyprop camgrove coupler(2 city) 43.66 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Primer for repairing diesel fuel tanks(4 city) 38.52 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Replacement labels for onsite diesel tanks(5 city) 87.11 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Rings to attach wrenches to blowers for filter cleaning 53.72 Fund (33 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Slip on cowhide drivers gloves, nitrile gloves(32 city) 514.84 Fund 60 Enterprise MURRAYSMITH INC 19-0389 WtrMain Replcmt Hickory-Pine-Fairview Svc to 622.50 Fund 6/30/20 60 Enterprise MYFLEETCENTER.COM Oil change for Lab vehicle C19577 55.19 Fund 60 Enterprise O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Protectant&cloth for Ops/Maint vehicles(2 city) 11.98 Fund 60 Enterprise O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Trailer Plug Adapter for Hydrant Truck,Qty 1 12.99 Fund 60 Enterprise O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Windshield wiper fluid&windshield cleaner(7 city) 33.43 Fund 60 Enterprise OFFICE TEAM PW Temp Receptionist: 3.3orsey in Week Ending 400.95 Fund 07/17/20 60 Enterprise OXARC,INC. PO#20-0342,Sodium Hypochlorite,Well 7,050.05 Fund 30,27,19,20,11,VR,28,22 60 Enterprise PACIFIC STEEL&RECYCLING Freight charges for inv#7301866 25.18 Fund 60 Enterprise PACIFIC STEEL&RECYCLING I beam for fabricating mounts for UV temp sensor(1 256.95 Fund city) 60 Enterprise PACIFIC STEEL&RECYCLING Steel to install adjustable pressure relief valve(2 city) 153.77 Fund 60 Enterprise PENN VALLEY PUMP CO Parts&labor to rebuild/repair PVP HP switch @ primary 817.00 Fund 60 Enterprise PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Parts to replace electrical for blower upgrades(80 city) 211.82 Fund 60 Enterprise POSTNET Backflow July 1st Past Due Letters, Batch 352.45 Fund 1053,Qty1,130 60 Enterprise PRECISION EQUIPMENT REPAIR Labor&parts for generator service on CCTV Van 1 251.07 Fund C16415 60 Enterprise PRECISION EQUIPMENT REPAIR Labor&parts for generator service on CCTV Van 2 240.94 Fund C19267 Date:8/4/20 01:22:55 PM Page:8 Item#16. City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise RESERVE ACCOUNT 20474979 Postage Use,July 2020 161.05 Fund 60 Enterprise RICK MURRAY REIMBURSEMENT, R. MURRAY,WASTEWATER 117.00 Fund COLLECTIONS IV EXAM&F 60 Enterprise ROCKY MOUNTAIN VALVES& Check valve for recirc line in reuse(1 qty) 2,326.94 Fund AUTOMATIONS,INC. 60 Enterprise ROGERS TIRE PROS AND AUTO CARE Labor&parts to put new rear tires on forklift 285.34 Fund 60 Enterprise SPECIALTY PLASTICS&FAB,INC Bushing,adapter,cap,coupler,elbow,tee, nipple, 151.43 Fund spigot 60 Enterprise SPECIALTY PLASTICS&FAB,INC Parts for Victory Reservoir CL2 Injector Relocation,Qty 149.41 Fund 56 60 Enterprise SPECIALTY PLASTICS&FAB,INC PVC spigot(4 qty) 8.12 Fund 60 Enterprise THE BRYAN YAGER GROUP, LLC 20 leadership books for WDP training, Nov-S. 430.00 Fund Deardorff 60 Enterprise UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE FICA Third Party STD Benefit Payment Qtr Ending 321.53 Fund 06/30/20 60 Enterprise UNITED OIL Diesel for plant(1,830 gal) 2,889.57 Fund 60 Enterprise WESTERN STATES EQUIPMENT CO Replacement horn for front end loader(1 qty) 66.36 Fund Total 60 Enterprise 202,176.11 Fund Report Total 546,760.96 Date:8/4/20 01:22:55 PM Page:9 Item#17. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: License and Management Agreement Between Western Ada Recreation District and the City of Meridian for Maintenance and Operation of Lakeview Golf Course Item#17. LICENSE AND MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN WESTERN ADA RECREATION DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF MERIDIAN FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF LAKEVIEW GOLF COURSE THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement")made and entered into this I Ith day of August, 2020, by and between the Western Ada Recreation District, a Recreation District created and organized under Title 31, Chapter 43 of the Idaho Code ("District"), and the City of Meridian, an Idaho municipal corporation ("City"). WHEREAS,City owns real property located at 4200 W Talamore Boulevard in Meridian, which is currently developed as an 18 hole public golf course, driving range, pro shop, restaurant and related facilities known as the Lakeview Golf Course (the "Facility"). WHEREAS, the Facility is currently under lease by the City to Lakeview Meridian Investors, LLC, (the "Leasehold Owners"). WHEREAS,the Leasehold Owners' use of the Facility is pursuant to a certain Agreement of Lease between the City of Meridian and Cherry Lane Recreation, Inc. dated August 13, 1999, which was assigned to the Leasehold Owners in an Assignment of Lease and Amended Lease Agreement between Leasehold Owners, as Lessee, and the City of Meridian, as Lessor,dated May 17, 2005 (all collectively referred to as the "Lease"). WHEREAS, District is currently under contract or will be under contract to purchase the assets of the Leasehold Owners, including their interest in the Lease,the leasehold improvements, and certain assets, properties and contractual rights used in connection with the operation of the golf course. WHEREAS, City intends to agree to an assignment of the Lease to District at such time that the purchase of the assets of the Leasehold Owners is completed. WHEREAS, City has proven experience at successfully and efficiently operating, maintaining, and programming public recreation facilities across the City. WHEREAS, District is interested in entering into a partnership with City to support the efficient operation of Lakeview into the future. WHEREAS, District is willing, upon certain terms and conditions, to license the Facility to City for the purposes stated herein for a period of time defined within this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE,the parties hereto agree as follows: A. GRANT OF LICENSE Page 1 Item#17. For and in consideration of promises contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, District hereby gives and grants to City the non-exclusive right, privilege and license to maintain and operate the Facility. B. TERM OF AGREEMENT The term of this Agreement commences on October 9, 2020 and ends on September 30, 2023 unless the parties mutually agree on an extension or early termination of this Agreement. City's agreement to continue its obligations under this Agreement shall be contingent on the City Council's appropriation of the funds necessary to operate and maintain the Facility. C. MASTER PLAN FOR OPERATIONS, IRRIGATION AUDIT, AND WATER RIGHTS RESEARCH City and District will endeavor to retain the services of a consultant or consultants to prepare (1) a Master Plan for the Operation of the Facility, (2) an Audit of the state of the Irrigation System including recommendations for extent and timing of any required repair or replacement of the irrigation system, and (3) Water Rights Research and filing of paperwork with the Idaho Department of Water Resources as necessary to assure that the water rights associated with the facility are fully secured. District agrees to contract directly with the mutually selected consultant(s) and District agrees to pay up to a combined total of$65,000 for such consulting services and deliverables. Subject to mutual agreement, the parties may negotiate for additional funds based on actual quotes for the work. D. USE OF LICENSED PREMISES City or its assignee(s) shall be licensed to operate and maintain the Facility in a manner consistent with other municipal golf course facilities. E. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE FACILITY City's maintenance and operation of the Facility during the term of this Agreement shall be consistent with the terms of the Lease agreement dated May 17, 2005 referred to in the premises (the "whereas clauses") and incorporated herein by this reference. Specifically, City's (or City's assignee(s)) obligations shall include but are not limited to the following Service Obligations: 1. Golf Services. City is hereby authorized to grant tee times to the general public on a fair and equitable basis, sell, rent, store and/or repair golf equipment; sell golf related clothing and supplies; provide instructional services in the playing of golf, rent power-driven golf cars and manually operated golf carts. 2. Junior Golf Program. Page 2 Item#17. City shall participate in the promotion of a Junior Golf Program. The City will coordinate with schools for instructional use, team practice, matches and tournaments. 3. Food and Beverage Services. City or its assignee is hereby authorized to sell food and beverages, including alcoholic beverages,within the restaurant. City or its assignee must obtain and maintain all City, State and Federal licenses and certificates necessary to operate the food and beverage services in accordance with business and health standards. All employees must be able to meet such associated standards as well. City or its assignee may operate the restaurant facility so as to maintain hours of service in conjunction with all regular golf course activities, including regularly or specially scheduled tournaments. The restaurant may be operated at additional times, so long as it complies with all laws and regulations applicable thereto. City or its assignee may install and maintain, at their own expense, all equipment necessary to operate a food and beverage service. City or its assignee shall provide and maintain the necessary inventory of food and beverage products required to satisfy the public demand thereof. 4. Liquor License. The Idaho State Retail by the Drink License to be included in the sale of golf course assets to District shall be retained in the ownership of the District during the term of this Agreement unless otherwise agreed by the Parties. District shall cooperate with City or City's assignee to utilize the License in connection with the food and beverage services at the Facility. 5. Building and Equipment Maintenance Services. City shall, at his expense, keep and maintain the premises and all buildings, structures, improvements, fixtures, trade fixtures, golf course maintenance equipment and use equipment, including power-driven golf cars and manually operated golf carts, office equipment, and utility systems which may now or hereinafter exist thereon, in good, operable, usable and sanitary order and repair and in a good, safe condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted, throughout the term of this Agreement. City's obligation to maintain equipment shall apply whether the equipment is owned by City or District, including equipment subject to lease agreements held by District. At such time that equipment owned by District has reached the end of its useful life, City shall cooperate with District to declare such items as surplus equipment or otherwise lawfully dispose of such depleted equipment. City, at its sole expense, shall be responsible for replacing any depleted equipment and City shall be responsible for procuring any additional equipment that City deems necessary to meet its maintenance and operations requirements under this Agreement. 6. Grounds Maintenance Requirements. City is hereby required to provide grounds maintenance services, including, but not limited to, the obligation to mow, edge, trim, overseed, fertilize, aerate, irrigate, sod, change cups, service tees, topdress, raise divots, rake traps, spray, mop, spot irrigate, syringe, and renovate turf and shrub areas designated hereunder; as well as to provide weed, disease and pest control, tree maintenance, maintenance of irrigation system Page 3 Item#17. including mainlines,pumps,boosters and controllers,keep swales in good repair and to provide the necessary maintenance of any appurtenant structures and equipment, and other duties as deemed necessary by City. 7. Irrigation System. City shall use its best efforts to maintain and operate the golf course irrigation system in its current state. Upon receipt of the Irrigation System Audit, City and District shall confer and agree upon the best course of action for the long term maintenance and repair of the irrigation system. Neither City nor District have any obligation for the long term maintenance and repair of the irrigation until agreed to in writing. 8. Staff and Employment Practices. During the term of this Agreement,City intends to maintain an adequate and proper staff to support its maintenance and operations obligations under this Agreement. City may hire staff directly as City employees, or City may manage staff employed by an independent staffing agency, or some combination thereof. 9. Utilities and Irrigation Assessments. At the commencement of the term of this Agreement, the City shall provide for the transfer of all applicable utility and telephone accounts to City accounts, and thereafter shall provide and pay for any necessary utilities, telephone service, and irrigation assessments at the golf premises. F. PAYMENT OF RENT In consideration for the obligations agreed to by City under this Agreement, and the benefit provided to the public, City shall not owe any monetary rent to District as rent during the term of this Agreement. City shall be entitled to retain any net profits from golf course operations, and City shall have the obligation to incur any net losses from golf course operations. G. INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE City hereby agrees to indemnify and hold District harmless from any loss, liability, claim or action from damages or injuries to persons or property in any way arising out of or resulting from the maintenance, use, and/or occupancy of the Facility by City, its agents, assignees, employees, guests, or business invitees. If any claim, suit or action is filed against District for any loss or claim described in this paragraph, to the extent allowed by law City shall defend District and assume all costs, including attorney's fees, associated with the defense or resolution thereof, however District shall not be relieved hereby from liability for its own negligent or willful acts or omissions or that of its employees. In addition, City shall maintain, and specifically agrees to maintain throughout the term of this Agreement, liability insurance in the minimum amount as specified in the Idaho Tort Claims Act set forth in Title 6, Chapter 9 of the Idaho Code, and such amount shall be deemed to be the limit of City's covenant to indemnify and save and hold harmless District. Page 4 Item#17. In the event the insurance minimums of the Idaho Tort Claims Act are changed, City shall immediately submit Proof of Compliance with the changed limits. H. TERMINATION TERMINATION UPON DEFAULT: If either party is in breach or default of any terms, covenants, or conditions of this Agreement and fails or refuses to cure such breach or default within 180 days of written notice thereof, this Agreement, and all rights conferred by this Agreement, at the non-breaching party's option, may be deemed terminated and forfeited without further notice or demand. Termination action by the non-breaching party shall be tolled as long as the party in breach is actively pursuing reasonable efforts to cure the breach. TERMINATION UPON MUTUAL AGREEMENT: The parties may mutually agree to terminate this agreement in writing at any time. I. ASSIGNMENT OR TRANSFER City shall not assign, sublet or transfer the City's interest in the licensed premises pursuant to this agreement, or any portion thereof, or cause or suffer any alterations thereto, other than as specified in this Agreement, without the express written consent of District, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. J. NOTICES 1. All notices or other communications required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and may be given by depositing the same in the United States mail, addressed to the party to be notified, postage prepaid and registered or certified with return receipt requested, by overnight courier, or by delivering the same in person to such party, addressed as follows: To District: Western Ada Recreation District By Mail at: P.O. Box 566 Meridian,ID 83680 By Delivery at: 30 E. Franklin Rd Meridian, ID 83642 To City: City of Meridian Attn: City Clerk 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian ID 83642 2. Notice shall be deemed given and effective the day personally delivered, the day sent by overnight courier,subject to signature verification,and the day of deposit in the U.S. Page 5 Item#17. mail, certified, return receipt requested, of a writing addressed and sent as provided above. Any party may change the address for notice by notifying the other parties of such change in accordance with this Section. K. APPROVAL BY GOVERNING BOARDS REQUIRED This Agreement shall not be effective for any purpose whatsoever until it is approved by the parties' respective governing boards. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have subscribed their names the day and year first above written. WESTERN ADA RECREATION DISTRICT By: Shaun Wardle, Board President CITY OF MERIDIAN By: Robert E. Simison,Mayor Attest: Chris Johnson, City Clerk Page 6 Item#18. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Assignment of Lease Between Western Ada Recreation District and the City of Meridian for the Provision of Golf Course Operations at City of Meridian's Lakeview Golf Course Item#18. ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE FOR THE PROVISION OF GOLF COURSE OPERATIONS AT CITY OF MERIDIAN'S LAKEVIEW MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE This ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE entered into by the City of Meridian, an Idaho municipal corporation, ("City") as Lessor and the Western Ada Recreation District, a Recreation District created and organized under Title 31, Chapter 43 of the Idaho Code ("District") as "Lessee". WITNESSETH, that for and in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE—CONTINGENT ON SALE OF ASSETS A. Provided that transaction contemplated in the Asset Purchase Agreement between Lakeview Meridian Investors LLC and District has closed and District has become the rightful owner of the Assets transferred by said Asset Purchase Agreement, City does provide its contingent consent to the assignment of that certain lease agreement dated May 17, 2005 between City and Lakeview Meridian Investors, LLC, (the Assignor)to Lessee, subject to the amended terms and conditions contained herein. B. Any waiver by District of the Seller's Covenants, Representations, Warranties, and agreement to pay Closing Date Indebtedness made in the Asset Purchase Agreement must be approved by City in order for the City's assignment of the Lease to become effective. 2. GRANT OF AUTHORITY; LEASED PREMISES A. The City accepts the Lessee as lessee of the Lease at the Lakeview Golf Course and understands that Lessee has all of the rights and obligation of the original lease, except as modified herein. B. Lessee acknowledges personal inspection of the golf premises and the surrounding area and evaluation of the extent to which the physical condition thereof will affect the operation of the golf course. Lessee accepts the demised premises in its present condition and agrees to make no demands upon the City for any improvements or alteration thereof. C. Ownership of all existing structures, and of all structures,buildings and/or improvements currently located upon the leased premises, and all alterations, additions or betterments thereto (the items included in the Description of Assets in the Asset Purchase Agreement), shall immediately vest and be vested in City after the term hereof, without compensation being paid therefore. Such structures, buildings and/or improvements shall be surrendered to City with the remainder of Page 1 Item#18. the leased premises upon termination of the Lease Agreement. As a condition of this Assignment of Lease, District shall execute all appropriate Bills of Sale and other documentation to effectively transfer title of all WARD Leasehold Assets to City upon termination of the Lease Agreement. 3. TERM A. As additional consideration for City's granting of this Assignment of Lease, the term of the assigned Lease agreement shall be from the effective date of the assignment until September 30, 2023 unless earlier terminated at the option of District. B. The Lessee DOES NOT have the option of renewing the Lease agreement beyond the term ending September 30, 2023. 4. PAYMENT OF RENT In consideration of Lessee's purchase of the golf course leasehold assets and the benefit provided to the public, which consists largely of the same taxpayer base as the City, Lessee shall not be required to pay any periodic rent payments to City. 5. INCORPORATION OF TERMS All terms and conditions of the May 17, 2005 Lease agreement and any addenda thereto that are not inconsistent with the terms of this Assignment of Lease shall remain in effect and are incorporated herein by this reference. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have subscribed their names this 11th day of August 2020. WESTERN ADA RECREATION DISTRICT: By: Shaun Wardle, Board President CITY OF MERIDIAN By: Robert E. Simison,Mayor Attest: Chris Johnson, City Clerk Page 2 Item#19. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Fire Department: Discussion of Potential Fire Stations 7 and 8 Item#19. C� fIEN , IN4, IDAHG-. MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Chief Niemeyer, Fire Meeting Date: August 11, 2020 Presenter: Chief Niemeyer Estimated Time: 20 minutes with question period Topic: Fire Stations 7 &8 Discussion The Fire Department will be presenting material and information for the consideration of Fire Station 7 and Station 8. This material will include: review of response time standards and why they are important, review of growth in both the Northwest area and South area (both current and proposed), review of financial outcomes and options based on decisions made, review of affects to ISO rating through the Idaho Survey and Rating Bureau, and lastly a discussion about which station comes first from the Fire Department perspective. We are working to keep the presentation limited to 1S-20 minutes to allow for a robust discussion with the Mayor and Council. Fire will be providing some pre-reading material by Friday of this week. Fire Department Evaluation/Presentation for Fire Station 7 and Fire Station 8 Review of MFD Response Time Standards- 20`15 Master Plan 2015- Fire Department Master Plan conducted with Meridian Stakeholder input (elected officials and citizens) ❖ Response time goals developed and unanimously adopted by Council in December 2016 *:*90 second "chute time" ❖ 5 minute travel time- City ****Maintain 80% or greater response reliability ❖ Along with Meridian specific goals, plan was conducted with other regional fire departments with a goal of strengthening mutual aid to assist in critical emergencies Review of MFD Response Time Standards- Performance Today (past 6 months) �:• Dispatch Processing time- ❖ 1 minute 54 second average �:• Chute time- + 70 second average *:• Travel Time- ❖ 5 minute 3 second average ❖ Effective Response Force- ❖ 8 minutes 26 second average Review of Response Time Standards- why does it matter? Review of Growth The Bulk of current growth is in the SE and NW quadrants along with the Ten Mile Interchange area Property for fire stations are located in these areas Review of Growth- Northwest area (Maroon approved — Green seen by Development staff — not yet submitted) - ----------- Ur7 1 4 41. Akm Fpj�nljj�- C%xuc MEIrtrIcy, -.Clrcljn UI Review of Growth- South area (Maroon approved —Green seen by Development staff —not yet submitted) =E WO h ,L R,.'*. -r ONE 'n =E WO h ,L R,.'*. -r ONE How does population growth correlate to ca Population History w,00o 9ooa 20,000 soca 70,O00 Oe< 70DO 0,000 6O0D �a oaa s oaa 4oaa �oaaD saga mnoo 2000 MOOD p ac- ao- > > p ao- ao- $o- ar- ac. ao- ,�o- �o- ac- ao- > 1 1 1 1 > > > > > ao- �o- ,�r- ar• as ao- > 1 1 1 1 > O —Growth Committee Data volume growth Incidents Per Year Comparison iv m 8m m r- W m o ,i " m :� m uD r-- W m O O 2 O O O O O O 4 4 O O O O O 4 O N N tv N N N N N N ry ry N ry ry N N N " How does adding stations improve response times? FA r= Impact Area a 9 Minute Cutoff Range: 7 - 9 ¢ 7 Minute Cutoff Range: 5 - 7 - [ 5 Minute Cutoff Range: a - 5 r Fiscal Year 202`1 Purchase Land in Northwest Meridian o December '20 ■ $90,000 (Impact Fees) Programming & Surveys for Fire Stations Seven and Eight with Architect Rice/Fergus Miller o October '20- January '21 ■ $26,812 (Impact Fees) Schematic Design, Design Development, Construction Documents (Stations 7 & 8) o March '21- July '21 ■ $603,350 (Impact Fees) Total FY21 Impact Fund Fiscal Impacts- $720,162 Fiscal Year 2022 Purchase two Fire Engines o October '21 ■ $1,272,122 (Impact Fees) Purchase Equipment for two new Fire Engines o April '22 ■ $500,000 (Impact Fees) Bid packages, Preconstruction Estimating, Budget Preparation Bidding process (RFM, ESI) o October '21- March '22 ■ $125,730 (Impact Fees) Start Construction First Station in April- Second Station in June o April '22- September 22 ■ $3,769,230 ( , Estimated Construction Costs) o Construction Administration with Rice/Fergus/Miller ■ $119,316 (Impact Fees) Total FY22 Impact Fund Fiscal Impacts- $5,786,398 Fiscal Year 2023 Twelve Firefighters- Staffing for Fire Station (Fully loaded including one time equipment) o October '22 ■ $1,587,820 (SAFER grant application; General Fund) Twelve Firefighters- Staffing for Fire Station (Fully loaded including one time equipment) o February '23 ■ $1,587,820 (SAFER grant application; Rural Fire partnership; General Fund) Promote/Hire 3 Battalion Chiefs (2nd Battalion to cover South Meridian) October '22 . $549,465 (General Fund) Continued Construction Station 7 & Station 8 o October '22- June '23 ■ $6,030,768 (Impact Fees, Estimated Construction Costs) o Construction Administration with Rice/Fergus/Miller ■ $178,974 (Impact Fees) Total FY23 General Fund Fiscal Impacts- $3,725,105 Total FY23 Impact Fee Fund Fiscal Impacts- $6,209,742 Fire Stations 7 & 8 N N O ON N N N NN N N N M O O CDN O N p O N O N N N p N N N N N ON N O N N N N N ON N p M CD O N N iy cy iy ON sNN N N N N O N a O M._n M> , MO N N CD �N�ON N N a,Ed O Ea�. pcVEa, ��NpOO p iItem NO tei i Oo ou tiNo. Description o ti o z 0 o z dc o z 0 LL a Staffing 1 Promotional training &testing 2 Recruitment &testing of new hires & laterals 3 Apply for SAFER Grant (consultant time for grant) 4 Grant results released 5 Promotional training &testing 7 Hire 12 new Firefighters for Station 7 (City) 8 Winter 2022 Fire Academy 9 District) 10 Assign Shifts for 12 personnel 11 Spring 2023 Fire Academy 12 Assign/Staff new fire stations Apparatus Purchases 1 New Ladder Truck Purchase 2 Spec new Fire Engines (Committee) 3 Submit order for two Fire Engines 6 Delivery of 2 Fire Engines 7 Place 2 Fire Engines in Service Design & Construction Timeline 1 Purchase Northwest Land for Station 7 Design & Survey (Programming - Two Stations Schematic Design, Design Development, Bid packages, Preconstruction Estimating, Budget 4 Preparation Bidding process (RFM) Bid packages, Preconstruction Estimating, Budget 5 Preparation Bidding process (ESI) 6 Groundbreaking- Fire Station 7 7 Construction - Fire Station 7 8 Groundbreaking- Fire Station 8 11 Substantial Completion - Fire Station 7 12 Final Completion - Fire Station 7 13 Substantial Completion - Fire Station 8 14 Final Completion - Fire Station 8 Cost Considerations for Two Fire Stations Cost savings of Building Two Fire Stations $175,000 Savings in Design Fees (Design for Station 8 $175,000 less than Station 7) 5% to 10% Cost Savings (per station) on Construction Building 2 Fire Stations Together ■ $450,000- $900,000 (Based on Fire Station 6 Construction Costs) Cost Considerations for Two Fire Stations Federal Grants for Staffing- Assistance to Firefighter Grant (AFG) Three Year Funding Assistance for firefighting personnel costs Grant Submittal Timelines Grant request submitted in by the end of March (FY2022 for our request) Grant awards announced throughout the month of September Grant Recipient Limits match $9 million—over 2.5m population $6 million -1 m to 2.5m population $3 million -500K to 1 m population $2 million -100K to 500K population $1 million—under 100K population Grant Funding Year 1 —25% local match Year 2 —25% local match Year 3 —65% local match SRB (Idaho Survey Rating Bureau) considerations (Mark) -.1 ISO (Insurance Services Office) ratings are used to help determine insurance premiums Fire Department ratings are 1-10 (1 being the best) -.1 Current Meridian rating = 3; No Class 1 departments; Class 2 departments- Boise, Idaho Falls Adding Station 7 and 8, as well as 2nd Battalion, achieves ISO Class 2 rating (80.58 points) Biggest benefit to community would be insurance premiums for businesses ❖ Smaller effect on homeowner premiums. Which Fire Station comes first? Risk analysis- South Station Geography- How much 'ground' is needed to be covered? ❑ South: Currently has 2 fire stations to cover half the response district- Priority ❑North: Currently has 4 fire stations to cover half the response district ,Area Risk- What buildings/projects are in the area? Equal Risk ❑ South: Southeast residential growing rapidly; YMCA; School; High speed two lane roads; Meridian Road ❑North: High School; large residential subdivisions; H 20/26 and commercial development; proposed healthcare complex (multiple); High speed two lane roads; Hwy 16 (MFD covers northbound from Hwy 20/26 to Hwy 444) Reliability- How 'reliable' are the closest stations to these areas? ❑ South: Station #4 (Eagle Road) currently 77%. Not enough data for Station #6. Closest mutual aid (Kung data not available)- Boise Fire Station #14 (5 mile) currently 77%- Priority ❑North: Station #5 (Linder Road) currently 85%. Closest mutual aid- Star Fire Station #1 currently 90% Mutual Aid availability ❑South: Kuna Fire Department (one station); Boise Fire Station #14- Priority ❑North: Star Fire Station #1; Eagle Station #3; Nampa Station #3 (I � WE N DIAN*-�- IDAHO Executive Session: Per Idaho Code 74-206A(1)(a): To deliberate on a labor contract offer or to formulate a counteroffer. Meeting Notes: