Loading...
2020-04-28 Work Session CE IDIAN - CITY COUNCIL WORK �W, P SESSION MINUTES https://meridiancity.org/virtualmeeting https://meridiancity.org/live Tuesday, April 28, 2020 at 4:30 PM 1. Roll-Call Attendance X Liz Strader X Joe Borton X Brad Hoaglun _X Treg Bernt X Jessica Perreault X Luke Cavener X Mayor Robert E.Simison 2. Adoption of Agenda - Adopted Item 3: Consent Agenda [Action Item] — Approved A. Approve Minutes of April 14, 2020 City Council Work Session B. Approve Minutes of April 14, 2020 City Council Regular Meeting C. Approve Minutes of April 21, 2020 City Council Work Session D. Approve Minutes of April 21, 2020 City Council Regular Meeting E. Final Plat for Burlingame Subdivision No. 2 (H-2020-0034) by Engineering Solutions LLP, Located at 1923 N. Black Cat Rd. F. Final Order for Inglewood Place Subdivision No. 1 (H-2020-0028) by The Pointe at Meridian, LLC, Located at 3250 E. Victory Rd. G. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Hill's Century Farm North (H- 2019-0134) by Martin L. Hill, Hill & Hill Properties, Located at the Southeast Corner of S. Eagle Rd. and E. Amity Rd. H. Pathways Agreement Between the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District and the City of Meridian for TM Crossing No. 4 Path Agreement I. City of Meridian Financial Report - March 2020 J. AP Invoices for Payment - 04/23/20 - $1,242,551.95 Item 4. Items Moved From the Consent Agenda [Action Item] Item 5: Department / Commission Reports [Action Item] A. Mayor's Office: Growth Areas Discussion B. Community Development Department: Planning Process Improvement Discussion Meeting Adjourned at 5:49 pm Meridian City Council Work Session April 28, 2020. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 4:32 p.m., Tuesday, April 28, 2020, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Joe Borton, Luke Cavener, Treg Bernt, Jessica Perreault, Brad Hoaglun and Liz Strader. Also present: Chris Johnson, Adrienne Weatherly, Bill Nary, Dave Miles, Mark Niemeyer, Joe Bongiorno and Caleb Hood. Item 1: Roll-call Attendance: X Liz Strader X Joe Borton _X_ Brad Hoaglun _X_Treg Bernt X Jessica Perreault _X_ Luke Cavener _X_ Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Okay. I'm going to call the meeting to order. For the record is Tuesday, April 28th, at 4:32 p.m. We will begin this meeting with roll call attendance. Item 2: Adoption of Agenda Simison: Okay. Item 2 is adoption of the agenda. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I move that we adopt the agenda as published. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as published. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 3: Consent Agenda [Action Item] A. Approve Minutes of April 14, 2020 City Council Work Session Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 4 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 2 of 25 B. Approve Minutes of April 14, 2020 City Council Regular Meeting C. Approve Minutes of April 21, 2020 City Council Work Session D. Approve Minutes of April 21, 2020 City Council Regular Meeting E. Final Plat for Burlingame Subdivision No. 2 ( H-2020-0034) by Engineering Solutions LLP, Located at 1923 N. Black Cat Rd. F. Final Order for Inglewood Place Subdivision No. 1 (H-2020- 0028) by The Pointe at Meridian, LLC, Located at 3250 E. Victory Rd. G. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Hill's Century Farm North (H-2019-0134) by Martin L. Hill, Hill & Hill Properties, Located at the Southeast Corner of S. Eagle Rd. and E. Amity Rd. H. Pathways Agreement Between the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District and the City of Meridian for TM Crossing No. 4 Path Agreement I. City of Meridian Financial Report - March 2020 J. AP Invoices for Payment - 04/23/20 - $1,242,551.95 Simison: And for the record we will show that Council Woman Perreault has joined us as of 4:33. Item 3 is the Consent Agenda. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I move that we approve the Consent Agenda. For the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I second the motion. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 5 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 3 of 25 Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. Any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 4: Items Moved From the Consent Agenda [Action Item] Simison: Had no items moved to the Consent Agenda. Item 5: Department/Commission Reports [Action Item] A. Mayor's Office: Growth Areas Discussion Simison: So, we will move into Item 5-A, Mayor's Office growth area discussion -- or areas discussion. I'm going to turn this over to Mr. Miles. Miles: Thank you, Mayor. Good afternoon, Council. Appreciate you taking the opportunity. I wanted to come back to you and talk about the growth areas conversation that we had started off back in early March. We were in front of you talking about growth areas. And, Chris, do you have the -- there you go. So, if you recall, this was a map that we introduced to you in concept at our early March conversation and, really, stepping back a little bit, this is -- we are looking for ways to convey information for you all, as well as the community, about where city resources are focused and that's kind of the high level takeaway of what this effort is -- is about with this tool and what the conversation that we are trying to have with you all is. So, with this tool we talked about it in the March session, some of the comments from you all indicated that we would like to see some feedback from our stakeholders, including key partners like the school district and highway district and so we have gone back since that time, we have talked with the school district particularly. You will see on -- the map currently has locations of future site schools, those that are either owned by the district or those that are planned for the district, so -- it's a little tough to see. Chris, if you can zoom in. Those that are in purple -- Chris, for conversation purposes let's focus on what would be the southeast part of the city. Yeah. Thank you. Those that are circled in purple are owned by the district and those that are not circled, but in black, are sites that the district has identified. So, we have got that layer cleaned up and placed on there for future schools only. The existing schools are there, we do have them, but they clutter the map quite extensively, so we thought it would be a little easier to see by taking those off. Additionally, we worked with the transportation committee and Council approved project -- road project plan that you all approved recently and put those projects into this plan. They are identified by the red squares and the blue circles in terms of prioritization. We did only prioritize and put on the map the first 15 and any additional projects beyond ranking 15 that were prioritized by ACHD. So, there are a few numbers in there beyond number 15. We also included the ACHD integrated five year work plan road and intersection projects. Those you see are either the blue line or represented by a blue circle for an intersection. Now, it's difficult to see, because the layer of the city-approved projects overlaps the ACHD layer. So, in an Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 6 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 4 of 25 intersection you only see the bubbled number that represents the city-identified priority, but underneath it is the -- the corresponding ACHD project as well. So, the intent really is to look -- Chris, if I could ask him to maybe zoom out one click. The other direction. Sorry, Chris. So, that we can see more of the city in one view. Thank you. The intent really is -- is that, for instance, in the southwest you can see primarily where key resources are being focused. You have sewer areas that are represented by the yellow -- areas in yellow. The area in what is a lighter yellow is area that's already annexed. You see the prioritized road and intersection projects in the red and the blue squares and circles correspondingly. You also have the ACHD projects that are identified there, particularly in the southeast part of town. We have future fire stations. I can't drive. Chris, on the left-hand menu there is the future layer. If you can open that up. So, you can see Fire Station Eight is scheduled to be down there. That's identified as a project under our impact fees and, really, where we are trying to go is to begin to see that many of the city resources are being focused in this area. A lot of the agency partnership efforts are being focused in this area and by logic it dictates that the growth efforts that are being driven by the city per city infrastructure and city efforts, are occurring in this area. Correspondingly, we can look at the northwest area and we will see similarities out there as well. But I figured for purposes of presentation we could focus on this area for the moment and it begins to paint a picture, again, where we are focusing our resources, where partners are focusing their resources, helping the community to understand that the efforts we are making are occurring in these areas and we are encouraging the infrastructure to grow here and thereby encouraging folks to look into these areas and look at these areas as areas that are growing. That's really all I have from a map and a tool perspective and I would turn it over to you all for any comments, any questions that that may generate on your behalf for this purpose. Simison: Thank you, Dave. And I will just chime in a little bit. You know, in reference to the CFP that you all received, I have tried to put together a CFP which does highlight these two areas that we have been talking about, northwest and southeast, as the areas where we are -- we are planning to invest our resources. We -- we have talked about police substations. Last week I think -- as the weeks are going together-- we did approve a concept spending money for additional Comprehensive Plan work up in northwest Meridian and the one thing that you don't see on this map, but I think it's important for our Public Works Department, is traditionally they are going to be putting stuff -- you know, putting resources into where the road improvement projects are occurring. You know, they go in tandem with that, but if we are saying that an area is not a priority, that they don't have to put resources towards putting water and sewer to those areas if they are not what we would consider growth priority areas and at the end of the day I know the question is out there, well, what does this mean? Well, I think what this means is that this is a guide for our community as to where we would like to see growth occur. I think from a simple standpoint, if we are putting our resources in northwest and southeast, the message to the community is we are likely not going to go invest and build our future Station Number Nine anytime soon. So, areas that are going to be served by that are -- are not where we would want to see development applications in the near or foreseeable future. That -- that to me is the end result of this and it lays out a plan for us and a plan for our community. It doesn't mean people can't submit, but I think it puts a significant Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 7 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 5 of 25 hurdle on those projects that they are going to have to bring a lot more than they may normally -- normally otherwise do to the table or to be considered, because we don't plan to invest resources there. So, for the record, I just want to note that Councilman Cavener has joined us at 4:40 from that standpoint and be happy to -- for any other questions that you would like to ask me, Dave -- we have Chief Niemeyer on here as well. Strader: Mr. Mayor, it's Liz. Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I guess -- I think one thing that might be helpful -- I think it's on most of our applications, but just -- if the map could clearly kind of delineate -- if the final map could kind of delineate those growth areas and sort of put the five minute fire response time as a -- as a boundary I think for me that would be really helpful as we are looking at future opportunities to develop. Simison: I think that's easy enough to lay out, knowing that it is sometimes a moving target. As some things develop that line will shift for a variety of reasons, but it's definitely a good point to continue to see. Miles: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Mr. Miles. Miles: And, Council Woman Strader, we do have that layer on here. I think one of the challenges with a tool like this and why we have gone with the GIS sort of web based platform is that it can get turned on and turned off. However, as maps go, maps become very cluttered the more layers we turn on, but we can certainly provide that and show that in a static state, if that's a final product that you would like to see. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Which one was that? Hoaglun: That was me. Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Question -- question for Dave. Dave, the yellow sections I want to make sure I understand. Are those areas that are currently under development with sewer and water? Miles: Mr. Mayor and Councilman Hoaglun, yes, the yellow -- the bright yellow that you see there is currently serviced by sewer and within the five minute response for fire. Those two items combined. The area that is down to the south in the lighter yellow is only representing area that's been annexed and encumbered -- entitled, excuse me, but it's Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 8 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 6 of 25 not yet inside of the five minute response and sewer service. It may be inside of one or the other, but it's not inside of both of those at this time and, again, we do have the layers on there where we can turn things on and off. If you would like to spend time going through that we can do that to give you some better visual representation, but that's what those two yellow colors represent. Hoaglun: Thank you, Dave. And, Mr. Mayor, if we might have Chris pull out a little bit, so we can see more of the northwest corner of our community. Miles: Mr. Mayor, Mr. Hoaglun, again, what you see -- Councilman Hoaglun, again, what you see there is the areas in yellow served by sewer and the five minute response currently and, then, you can see there the existing owned -- or, sorry, future owned school sites or future school sites that the district has planned for, but doesn't yet own, as well as the future fire station. Simison: And the one thing I would add, just so it doesn't go unsaid, anything future with the school is contingent on a bond passing before it is to be built, so -- and the likely -- with the -- with the blue lines on there, the ACHD projects, those are future ACHD road projects that require things like gas tax, which is not being generated right now, to be built. So, everything is within a certain --this is what the plans are, but funding will be necessary for all of it to manifest over time. Bongiorno: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Deputy Chief. Bongiorno: I know just -- first off, Mayor and City Council, I just wanted to thank you for this map. The map has been very helpful for me with my job and also I have already been contacted by a couple developers asking me where is the city going? Because they are out buying property now in that McDermott, Ten Mile, northern -- north-south corridor. So, there is -- there is more -- there is more coming and so they are just asking where and so I'm like, you know, you're -- you're going to have to work with the city on that one. It's coming. So, the map is very important and I'm -- and I'm not sure if Mark wants to add anymore to that, but -- thank you. Simison: So, Council, what I have not -- you know, Mr. Miles said what -- what's the end goal today. You know, I'm not asking for a formal resolution that says these are our growth priority areas, but I am looking for a general consensus from Council if they agree, this is where we should be communicating to the community where -- where we envision and will be investing our time, energy into future development outside of our core and so that's kind of really the level that we are at. You know, I -- I don't know that this means anything beyond that today. If there is further elements that we want to start looking at in terms of incentive -- incentives or disincentives, that's a future conversation, but I think by the fact that we are investing resources in this area, just from police and fire, that is the incentive. That's allowing for growth and development to occur, as -- it's just a very basic level from that standpoint. But that's kind of the -- where I was hoping we could get to today, unless Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 9 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 7 of 25 you say that, no, we should not be growing in one of these two areas, I would ask for you to speak up, so that we can remove it from the --from the CFP and plan accordingly under just one of these areas. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I was under the impression that we were -- these -- these -- these two areas -- these growth areas were -- were discussed. I think I -- in my opinion we have always been going south up until Owyhee High School got built and approved and that sort of changed our plans a hair. I think that, you know, obviously, the northwest and, then, the south I think is -- I think is where -- in my opinion where we are heading. Also I think that, you know, we need to focus on in-fill projects as well. So, those are the three talking points that I feel are -- are most important and should be on our radar going forward. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: I think some of the -- the question left that you hinted at was if -- if the yellow is depicting what might be the -- the priority areas, how that -- again, how that's specifically going to be used. If I'm a -- if I'm a developer in a different area that's not in the yellow am I -- am I discouraged from -- from applying? Am I -- what's -- what's the ultimate outcome where a development -- the development community would say I'm contiguous and I can pull water, sewer, because I'm contiguous, but I'm not in the yellow. So, what's the practical effect of a priority area to me? Is it going to mean a different treatment by the city, a different recommendation or decision by the Council? I assume it's one of those things, otherwise, there is no real impact of having a priority area. We would notify the development community that these are where we could most efficiently grow, but if they still want to expand elsewhere, what does that -- what does that ultimately mean, so -- I get the intent, but trying to understand what that means at what stage. Simison: And I think just for help, Dave, can you put on the seven and eight five minute fire response times? I want people to see what -- what we are really talking about from a priority growth area, because it's really going to be the areas in red or whatever the response times are. Not the yellow. The yellows are just areas which are able to easily annex right now, not where -- that's not where we are limiting growth to those parcels. Just want to make sure that's clear. Borton: Okay. Simison: You know, that will go fairly large coverage. So, Dave, if you can -- Miles: Yeah. Mr. Mayor. Chris, if you could -- it's probably easiest. Do you want to brave giving me controls and see if the speed is not impacted? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 10 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 8 of 25 Johnson: Mr. Miles, it should be on your screen to take control right now. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, as -- as Dave and Chris are working on that, I -- I wanted to follow up on Councilman Borton's comments tonight and he used the word that I think is most important and that's efficiently provide the services. So, even if they are not in these areas, if we can provide efficient services or in an efficient manner where there is water, there is sewer, their response times are in good shape, I wouldn't discourage developers from seeking an application, but certainly we have priority areas. And I know the city's invested quite a bit in south Meridian over the years and we are seeing the growth in the northwest corner of our community. So, definitely those are priority areas to me, but if-- if there is efficiencies to be gained for developers and in-fill development, as Councilman Bernt mentioned, I wouldn't dissuade them from pursuing that. But being efficient, not having to extend new services or -- or going for after other-- other things that are outside boundaries that -- that call for longer response times, that's -- that that is concerning. Miles: And Mr. Mayor? Simison: Turned on the sewer, but not the fire. Miles: Right. Sorry. I just wanted to maybe walk through what I was going to do before -- before just doing it and throwing it in -- in the -- in the Council's lap to -- to discern. So, what I just turned on was the current areas that are served by sewer and, then, I will turn on the fire response and what you will see is that overlap and some areas do and some areas don't and that's the reason that these areas in yellow show up as serviceable under our definition, because they currently have sewer, they currently have fire. We can turn off the sewer response time and look at just what the five minute response is currently today and you can see where it's at and, similarly, we can go up to the northwest and take a look at that area as well and so there you have only the five minute response as it is today and now you have got the sewer added into there. Now, what we also have the ability to do is we can turn on the fire response as it's predicted based on the location of the future fire station in the northwest, in this case we identified it as Station Number Seven and if we throw that layer on you can see that now the entirety of that northwest is covered in that five minute response parameter. So, I think, to Councilman Borton's question, I think that was -- do we have that capability and can we see that. I know that several of the Council Members have asked that question. Yes, we have all -- all manner of tools in this regard and to the -- to the question of what to do with it, I think that's a little bit of the -- from -- from my perspective hearing Council discussions with school districts and other agencies and other folks, providing the best information we can to you all as decision makers, as -- as applications come in as development proceeds forward and I will stand there for any comments or questions. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Thank you. Yeah. I think that this tool is really important and I think it could be really helpful to our development community. You know, if Council is in broad agreement that we want services to be in place, particularly the Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 11 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 9 of 25 sewer sheds because of the exorbitant cost and fire services in five minutes and we have some general alignment around kind of what we are looking for, it seems like you could almost make a map, you know, by year with what we are predicting to do. So, we know where the services are in place today. No one can predict the future, but assuming the next fire stations happen within a certain time frame, you could almost map that out for people and really give them a sense of where we are going. But I do think it's important to outline our priorities of where we want to grow, so that we are just doing it efficiently, you know, for the taxpayers. Simison: And back to the comments that were made, I don't think that anyone is saying no one can apply for an application to do it. I just think it's important for people and Council to understand where we are investing our resources moving forward, so that you -- you have that information when you make a decision. And, again, I go back to -- if you don't want to grow in these areas or one of these areas, tell us now, so we can pull back one of the fire stations and put the fire station where you do want to grow, because we can't grow in all -- we really have three growth areas left and we can't grow in all three at the same time. The one in the -- the one in the southwest not only requires a fire station, it requires the McDermott trunk line to be built. You know, these are the type of costs that you are looking to incur. If you want to grow -- tell people that's where you want to grow and develop. So, it's -- in essence, I'm saying you can pick two of the three, but you can't pick all three or you can choose to pick none and we will provide services as we see fit to areas without any of that certainty about when things will be developed in one area. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: I agree with Councilman Hoaglun in the sense of I don't know that we -- we necessarily say that we are specifically focusing on southeast and northwest, it's more along the lines of if there is an area where we can grow efficiently and it doesn't incur additional cost to the city, then, that's -- then we just allow those applicants to make the request and -- and I'm not saying that the city is trying to make a statement that -- that those are the only locations that -- that we grow in, but I am a little bit concerned that that might -- that we might inadvertently communicate that and so I don't -- I don't know that I have a solution for that. I understand that what you are requesting is along the lines of how we are looking at our future expenditures and our budget and in addition to how we are guiding or recommending growth to happen with our development community. So, agree with Councilman Borton that we should do it in the most efficient way and if that means moving to the southwest and the northeast and those are the -- those are the locations that we -- that we focus on. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor -- or Dave and Chief Niemeyer, fire stations, I mean both of these areas are seeing development. There is -- there is a lot of opportunity in both to the southeast and the northwest. Can we do two fire stations simultaneously from a budgeting standpoint? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 12 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 10 of 25 Niemeyer: I think -- Councilman Hoaglun, Mr. Mayor, I can chime in first from the operational logistics side of things. Can we build two? The answer is yes. We have engaged our architects. We have engaged DBSI, who was our general contractor for Station Six. They actually recommend if it's feasible, if you can do it, financially it's the way to go, because you can move the crews from one station to the next and what we have been told and we have been asking for some harder numbers on this -- is that there is some cost savings in doing two at the same time, as opposed to spacing them out throughout a few years, three or four years, however you look at that. From a financial standpoint can we afford it? We have been looking at our impact fee collections certainly moving forward. We are not sure what that means with the times that we're in, but we have been staying in touch with Todd as far as the health of our impact fee fund and we anticipate that by the time we get to the phase of building we would be -- if not close to having the funds within our impact fee fund to be there. Hopefully that answers your question. Bernt: For both or -- sorry, Mr. Mayor. For both or for just one? Niemeyer: There is some unknowns, Councilman Bernt, quite honestly. We need to get harder numbers from the -- from the builders to know if we did two at one time what would that cost look like as compared to just doing one and, then, doing another one two, three, four years down the road. Simison: And just to follow up, I mean Mark is only talking about building the buildings. Niemeyer: Yes. Simison: We have the ability to build the buildings. I'm not worried about that. We can build them and we can even repay with impact fees as they come in if -- if they are not collected at that point in time. The bigger question for Council -- and this is not just this Council, because you all may or may not be there in -- two years from now. The operational costs of operating both of these have certain assumptions built into them that you will have to consider and weigh as well. Niemeyer: Right. Simison: In order to -- the VFR it anticipates taking three percent every year for the next four years, except for this year. If you don't take that three percent in any given year, I can't open the two fire stations, so -- Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Yeah. That was my follow-up question was, okay, from -- from the operational side of things, not only the ongoing financing for what's needed, but also, Chief, can you speak to the ability to get bodies -- qualified bodies into those fire stations to -- to operate them? Niemeyer: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Hoaglun, thanks for the question. Good question. As far as hiring new firefighters, we do not see an issue with that. Our last probably six years Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 13 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 11 of 25 when we have put on new entry level testing, we have had over 400 people apply and go through that process. That's not a challenge. The secondary challenge would be do we have time to get people ready to promote into those ranking positions that we need to open new fire stations. For example, company officer, engineer, et cetera. You know, depending on the timing and I think as we lay out our CFP and we have worked very closely with Todd and with the Mayor's office on the CFP. We have time to get people ready to promote. We have got enough people coming up through the ranks, eligible to get them through the testing process and ready for promotion by the time these fire stations would be opened and staffed. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, Chief, thanks. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Is it possible -- I -- I want to ask a couple questions about this, too, maybe to just zoom in on the piece of south Meridian where the new fire station would be built with the future service overlap and, then, if there is a view that would, then, show us areas that have developed that may not be served in a five minute response today, if there are any. Miles: Mr. Mayor and Council Woman Strader, if I understand your question correctly, you are wanting to see parcels that are under development as they sit today with the sewer and the fire response; is that correct? Strader: Yeah. I think what I'm trying to get at, just thinking out loud, but if I had to prioritize, like I think it's important for us to make sure that places developing now have good service; right? Owyhee High School is already happening, so it seems like we have to, you know, serve that area in northwest Meridian. I guess what I'm getting at is between northwest and the southern part of Meridian is there a prioritization among those two locations as well? Simison: Well, Dave, should be able to get there, but I -- I know that we have places in south Meridian that don't have the fire coverage, just like northwest and the question will be how much. You know, it-- it's twofold, because everything that's in the light yellow has the ability to develop once they get sewer there. Mile: Yeah. Mr. -- Mr. Mayor and Council Woman Strader, what I'm trying to show you is a comparison of three different scenarios. So, currently what's turned on is the current five minute response and the current sewer serviceability, which you can see here in this black line is a -- as I show my -- my mouse. To the Mayor's comment, these areas in the lighter yellow are already annexed and entitled, so once they get sewer there there is nothing that I understand -- and Mr. Nary can interject, but nothing saying that they can't develop, even though they may be outside of the five minute response. Compare that to an area to which the Mayor referred to over in the southwest where you have got areas that are both outside of the five minute response and the current sewering areas and that Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 14 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 12 of 25 are not annexed, which affords the Council and the decision makers the ability to decide what's best for the city as it grows, as I understand it. I think that is addressing your question, Council Woman Strader, but I'm not a hundred percent certain. Simison: Yeah. This -- this shows Sky Mesa. You can see -- it's hard to tell, but Sky Mesa area is outside of the five minute response currently, as well as some of -- on the other side of Paramount -- I'm sorry -- of Century Farms. It's -- if you want to pull it over a little bit. So, those are the areas. But did you have another question. Council Woman Strader? Strader: I guess just a follow-up thought. I mean so in my mind I am -- I am comfortable telling developers that the southwestern portion of Meridian is not necessarily one of our top priority growth areas, because we are going to struggle already to provide adequate -- I think fire response times to these other areas that are already developing that need service. So, I think there is a lot of value to that staging and prioritization and I guess I need to see a little more detail on the cost savings of doing two fire stations simultaneously, but if -- if there is a significant cost savings it -- it seems like it's worth evaluating that. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Dave, could you also turn on the fire response times on one station -- it -- is Station Eight already included in this or is -- would that be this -- the future station number? Miles: Mr. Mayor, Council Woman Perreault, that is -- that is what we have identified as a future station and it's not currently representing the five minute response, but I did just turn it on. Perreault: Okay. Miles: So, you might see that difference. Perreault: So, what I'm noticing the -- the difference between the two areas is it seems like there is not as much sewer availability currently in the southeast as there is response time, even without the new station being built and, then, it seems like there is kind of the vice-versa in the northwest where there is -- there is sewer capacity, but not fire response time. So, we have two different issues going on and I don't know if that -- if that -- there is a factor-- a cost factor whether it's more expensive to bring in sewer lines versus build fire stations. I don't know. Just throwing that out there. Simison: I guess from my perspective, from what I am aware, most of what's occurring in southeast is being pulled by development and it's -- it's coming. Up in northwest will likely involve the city making that investment or some of it potentially to open up that area Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 15 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 13 of 25 for development. Not -- it doesn't have to. It could still be developer driven, but I think part of the question ultimately becomes you invest in the sewer infrastructure into northwest or do you start building the McDermott trunk line to open up the southwest part of Meridian for development. Those are the -- those are the type of conversations that this is really leading to. Is this going to help our Public Works Department prioritize where they think they should be putting in resources for where the development may likely occur. It's -- and all these situations it's not a matter of one or the other, it's a matter of timing about when those investments are made. So, Council, I would like us to get on to the next item, unless there is -- if you have got a real hesitation with this, I would ask you to speak up now and we can bring it back. Otherwise, I would like you to use this as a guide moving forward and we can have further conversations about what it means, but it would be useful for our -- I think our Community Development Department even to help have conversations with people who are coming to look to develop on the west side of Meridian Road in south of our community and we know those conversations are occurring as well. It doesn't mean they can't apply and I think to the point I said earlier, it's just that people may have to do more if they want to be compliant. I mean I think the fire chief could tell you they want to sprinkler all their homes in an area where we are not going to have fire service in the future. That's something that they could do. If those are the types of things that Council wants to consider to allow development to occur in other parts where we may not be investing a fire station for the next seven, eight years. But I don't want to get too far down those policy conversations right now. It's not my intention. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Thanks, Mr. Mayor. I appreciate what I really think you and staff are -- are trying to do to kind of-- essentially you're building a map about where the city is going to head growth wise and I think that's -- that's to be commended, but I guess I'm -- I am taking an issue with that. I feel like that there is only three destinations -- there are only three -- three different routes that we can take. So, I struggle as the last time this topic was brought up identifying that these areas are, quote, unquote, priority growth areas. If we really wanted to say we are going to get serious about priority growth, then, it should be in-fill, end of sentence, in my opinion. I will always struggle with even insinuating that development in certain areas is to be discouraged. If we want to have a conversation about where we need to build our fire stations and fire station priorities, I think that's a different conversation. I still go back to the subject of -- of the five minute travel time or five minute response time and what that's derived from and why it's different than a lot of other municipalities across the country. So, even extending our response time out to five and a half or six minutes, you start to gain a lot of coverage on this map. So, I appreciate the thoughtful comments and where I, essentially, see this going, but you asked for feedback if we are opposed or if this is something we are not necessarily behind and I just think that I owe it to you to let you know that I -- I -- I continue to struggle with this idea of identifying only two areas that we are going to allocate our resources towards in the future. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 16 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 14 of 25 Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I think just --just to maybe give something to chew on; right? Like I think where I -- where I do get on board with it -- and for me the difference is I don't think we should be prepared to invest in a whole new sewer trunk line. I mean I think we could have someone outline for us what the cost to the city would be for that and for us to do that would be necessary to really open up development, from what I understand, in the southwest part of Meridian and so I am okay with discouraging that and I agree with, you know, there is a prioritization. In-fill is, obviously, the priority, but I think it is okay to say we are not prepared to make certain investments at this time. Do you look at it that way, Luke, or do you -- Mr. Mayor, if you want to direct that to Luke, but I would be curious his feedback. Simison: Yes. And -- Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Thanks, Mr. Mayor. It's -- it's a really valid question, Council Woman Strader. I guess for me at the end of the day the connection that -- that sewer trunk line is not something that is coming from our taxpayers; right? That -- that is coming from -- from ratepayers and from connection fees and development is going to bore the cost of that. So, it's not a conversation of because we are investing in sewer trunk line that means we can't do a park or we can't build a third fire station or a second fire station or we can't hire more police officers. I think because those are -- that's an Enterprise funded project. From the planning standpoint I think to the Mayor's point that is -- that is an important component. We don't want to necessarily have our Public Works staff just kind of throwing darts at a dartboard about where should we go work today, but from the coast standpoint, that's something that I personally am not as concerned with, as I am with kind of the -- the plan about this is where we are going to allocate other city services in the future. If that makes sense. Strader: Mr. Mayor, follow up. Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I think -- I think where -- where it starts to become a concern for me -- it's not just building it; right? It's supporting it. The personnel that have to go and service it, then, we layer in all the additional services in each area. It just feels like if we don't set priorities we might see growth happen all over the place at one time and I guess that -- that's my fear is that if we don't set that prioritization we will find our services stretched and the taxpayers will ultimately have to pay for it if -- if impact fees and other things are not adequate or if that cost isn't fully captured, but I respect your opinion about it. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 17 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 15 of 25 Cavener: I'm just curious. Have we ever used -- in our city's history have we used General Funds to pay for sewer line or water line construction development? I mean that might be a better question for Todd. I don't think that we have. Simison: Not that I am aware of, no. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, to that point I think Council Woman Strader has -- has a really valid point. If -- if growth that is being paid for by the Enterprise Fund is -- because it's not managed appropriately it's causing an undue burden to the taxpayer, that's an important piece to look at. It's not something, again, that I -- I thought that we had dealt with, but I think it's -- it's a very valid point to share and something that's definitely worthy of consideration. Simison: If I can say, I think that's a conversation that will be had and it's a separate conversation, but it's important to recognize the -- the cost of Public Works infrastructure at this point in time, including new growth, does have an impact to our current ratepayers. I'm just going to leave that right there for right now for conversation in the future. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: I think one collateral benefit of -- of what you are trying to accomplish is if there is some concern that an area is not the most efficient region to develop, that -- that they are aware of it early. So, if we are going to focus our investments in a couple of areas and not the southeast in this example, then, the sooner that that can be communicated consistently, well before it gets in front of the Planning and Zoning Commission and at Council, I think everybody benefits. So, that's probably one of the intended -- maybe unintended consequences and benefits of trying to do what you're doing. Simison: Councilman Borton, thank you. That -- that is accurate. I think it lays the groundwork to say here is where we want to see growth occur. If you're going to go outside of this area you may have additional hurdles, because we are not putting the resources in those areas from the city's perspective and the one thing that's lost on this is the Police Department. Now, it gets more and more expensive for them to patrol larger areas, so the more we can concentrate where they need to be investing their patrol officers the better and the last thing I'm going to say about all of this, I honestly believe that these maps are just -- I'm going to use the word codifying -- codifying what's already occurring in our community, whether we like it or not, but it's where development is taking us and we are just agreeing from the city's perspective that, yes, we need to -- we need to fall back with this information, because to the point we have already -- this is where the applications are current in these two locations. Do we keep up with the -- with the growth and invest our resources and try to get other people to do the same? That's what this really is. Codifying where we are and where we are headed. I use codifying very loosely, though, for the lawyers on the -- on the call. Council, if we could, so we can try to get on to the other item, if you have any further concerns let's -- I ask you to notify Dave Miles Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 18 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 16 of 25 and we can come back if we need to for further conversation. But the roadmap -- if we decide to do anything more, to Councilman Cavener and Council Woman Strader's comments and talk about, you know, in-fill, that is the -- that should be our priority for growth first and foremost. That's where I think we really talk more about incentives is if we are going to want people to go in other places. This is just telling people where we are helping to establish those boundaries and I would like to stop right there, unless there is anybody else that feels they need to speak on this topic right now. Perfect. B. Community Development Department: Planning Process Improvement Discussion Simison: Okay. Then we will move on to the next item and we will go until 5:45, if that works for everybody, to give a 15 minute break before the next meeting, and I will turn it over to Mr. Hood. Hood: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of Council. This is round three. I'm going to try to do this in under the 25 minutes we were just allocated. As a quick refresher, so there are -- there are three documents that are -- that the clerk has uploaded in the packet for this afternoon's meeting. I'm largely going to be working from the -- it's a Word document, I think it's been turned into a pdf, but it's the code changes. So, it's titled Proposed UDC Text Amendments. So, that's the one I would ask if you can have that one handy. There is going to be a couple of references to that document. There is an Excel spreadsheet as well that's uploaded and, then, a cover memo, but working less from those two documents. So, just to kind of quickly bring us back to where we left off last time, I think one of the last comments was actually made by Council Woman Perreault. She just wanted to make sure that -- and I will let you know, by the way, we touched base earlier this week on the direction given thus far. I think we are on the same page, had the same notes in both the process and potential code changes, but I do want to just reiterate, though, things that are -- that are potential code changes do still have to go through the public hearing process. So, there will be a public hearing both before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, just trying to get at least a solid footing, make sure we are on generally the right page, but you can -- you reserve the right to change your mind as we get through the public hearings and if-- we talked about 500 feet being the appropriate distance to notice for public hearings and now you think it's a thousand after listening to public testimony or you want to go back to 300 feet or whatever. So, again, no -- no real decisions have been made, it's just direction so we hopefully can make that go as smoothly as possible through the public hearing process. Want to make sure -- get that good direction from you. So, then, to kind of pick up again from where we left off last week, hopefully you had some time to chew on and think about scheduling of public hearing items. So, we kind of -- we had a good, healthy discussion I thought last week about should staff wait to schedule public hearings before we get -- or until we get the Ada County Highway District staff report. I don't want to, you know, run through all the pros and cons necessarily to that, but I also want to add to that a little bit -- part of the discuss about receiving public testimony. I think the two are very interrelated and also the staff report timing and having the staff report so that both the Planning and Zoning Commission and -- and you all and the public and the development community have staff Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 19 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 17 of 25 reports in a timely manner to review and comment on is very closely tied to a new section of code that we are proposing and this is on page seven of eight on that proposed UDC text amendment document that I referred to at the beginning. It's a new section, 11-5A- 6H. And, again, I mentioned this I think in the first time we started talking about this, it says that written testimony must be submitted to the city clerk no less than five days prior to the day on which the public hearing is scheduled. We are really looking at three days, but, essentially, what staff has been charged with doing is getting staff reports done, again, in a timely manner sooner. So, a week before, two weeks before these hearings, so that everyone can consume them, think about them, and that still gives them plenty of time to get their comments in writing for the record for everybody to consider. So, I want to just kind of roll that into part of the discussion about scheduling for hearing. Some of the benefits -- potential benefit if we were to wait is to have all of that information present, instead of rushing from sometimes to get ACHD's comments or staff report last minute. One of the things that Council Woman Perreault asked me to just explain to you a little bit more is that process with ACHD and I touched on it last week a little bit with Bill Parsons being our main point of contact with ACHD to try to coordinate hearing dates and for those development applications that are typically larger or controversial or both, he does typically talk to ACHD and say we have got this project, when do you think you will have a staff report or when do you think your Commission action will be and, then, we schedule our Planning and Zoning Commission for after that. We don't always hit that mark. Sometimes there is an appeal that happens and it has to go to the commission. The ones that are approved at their -- at their staff level and aren't -- aren't appealed or are a no review or a comply with, those ones aren't -- aren't an issue -- are probably somewhere in the 90th percentile of all projects that are of that variety that are -- I don't want to classify them all as noncontroversial, but they don't -- they don't rise to the level of having to go to the ACHD commission for a hearing or two and being continued. So, we are talking about a very small percentage of our overall hearing applications that do have that hiccup, if you will, where Planning and Zoning Commission and staff don't have ACHD's comments, but those are usually the big and important ones that we don't have them or we miss it where it is controversial. There are neighborhood concerns. And so this potential change would fix that where you have got neighborhood associations that want to talk about traffic implications, that would all essentially be put to bed before we even get to the Planning and Zoning Commission and -- and, then, staff, again, would have that information and could consider that in part of their recommendation to appointed and elected officials. So, I'm not necessarily advocating one way or the other, I'm just trying to give you all of the information. At the end of the day if a hundred percent of the time you want to know for certain, you know, where ACHD stands on a project, you would need to probably adopt this new policy. This isn't a code, it would just be a policy or a process change for us about not scheduling for public hearings until we get ACHD comments on all development review applications. If not, again, we are somewhere in the 90th percent of all projects that we get those comments in time. So, you would to some degree be penalizing those -- those other projects by a couple of weeks, probably typically on average, if we just made that broad statement of don't schedule until we get ACHD's comments back. So, that's kind of the first order of business is to pick that up and, again, I rolled in a new piece what -- again, what you have before says five days, but it's really three days prior to being a cutoff, basically, to give you a fair shake at considering all the Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 20 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 18 of 25 public comments. There are some other sections of that code as well. It can't just be anonymous comments, you have got to include your name and -- and your address and a couple of other things. But, essentially, that's it. So, with that, Mr. Mayor, that's the first kind of order of business. Simison: Council, one of the things that I didn't get a chance to speak to Caleb about, but I have mentioned to Cameron and I don't know if Caleb's thought on this, but, you know, I have tried to take somewhat of the approach of slow things down to speed things up, where if we do hold off and say we need that information before we schedule, that we shorten the time frames that are -- that we would get our -- through our process, you know, currently is it 75 days, Caleb, that you have from start to end, you know, where we say we will do it in 60 days instead. You know, we try to make up some of the time through our process, because in theory we have the information and people can make educated decisions at the right time. We schedule it once, we don't have to, you know, have -- you know, re-notice and have it come back. I actually think that we will be more efficient with our staff's time, with the community's time, with the developer's time, if we have the information in hand, get the staff reports written and effectively move these through our hearing processes. So, that's my food for thought on this and happy for anyone else to weigh in. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: I totally agree with you. That was my hope in -- in requesting this change was that it would slow things down to speed things up. In the interim, though, since we have started these discussions, I have received some feedback from some applicants that they -- that our current process -- and I should say current since -- since the end of last year, beginning of this year, has been much longer and -- with their particular applications, of course, than the six to eight weeks which we shoot for and so because of the -- those recent experiences, they -- they have some questions and concerns regarding whether this would -- would slow the process down even more and so I wanted Caleb to -- Caleb to address that if he would and share with me what -- share with everybody I should say what he shared with me about it seeming like things will be able to speed up a bit because of new staffing and whatnot. Hood: Yeah. Mr. Mayor, Council Woman Perreault, thank you. So, for those of you that don't know, we hired a new associate planner. We have actually hired two in the last six months. Since January we have two. So, that will certainly help with the amount of applications we are able to process, particularly hearing level applications. So, that I think is -- is largely going to help, again, move things through the process. We didn't anticipate this COVID hiccup. I think I'm -- I'm confident that we can get back to that six or seven weeks -- a timeline as we kind of discussed last time even a little bit, you know, I think I mentioned eight weeks or so right now is kind of what we are running from when an application is submitted. If we transmit an application right away, that's typically plenty of time to get ACHD's comments. Roughly two months. If we are back to the six weeks -- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 21 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 19 of 25 now, again, that's -- that's kind of putting the -- or 30 days, that's putting them under the gun, but I'm -- I think a lot of the continuations that we have seen over the last year or so have been due to, again, some controversial projects and being short staffed and I see those going away. We are kind of almost implementing this process inadvertently byjust having to -- this bottleneck in -- in having to cancel some meetings and having some lighter agendas just because we weren't sure how we were going to take public testimony and whatnot, but that bottleneck is kind of opening back up now, again, for the reasons I just mentioned and I'm -- I'm pretty confident that we can go fast again. This -- this go slow part being waiting for ACHD, we could run back into that problem, though, because we have the staff, then, to process the applications. Will we have the data necessary or not is the question. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: As to this issue I don't have as much concern with -- with requiring those reports to be present before a hearing is set. I just think of our continuing discretion on any application, if we don't feel that -- or Planning and Zoning doesn't feel that we have sufficient information on that particular application to make a decision, from the school district or ACHD, and the staff report has specific importance, which in those rare occasions that -- that application could be continued at the discretion of the decision maker. So, you sort of pick your poison and if -- if, understanding our exercise of that discretion, any person on either Commission or Council can do that or make that request, if necessary, maybe an alternate way to still ensure the decision makers have everything they need. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: So, my last few years on Planning and Zoning I wish it had been a more rare occasion, but we were continuing a lot of hearings and what was happening was -- is that the public would show up to the hearings and, then, they would be continued and they were very frustrated and -- and while they weren't sending in a-mails to the city, they were expressing their frustration as they would leave the building that they had, you know, taken off work to be there or gotten babysitters to be there and we were frequently hearing from frustrated people who had arrived to the hearing and, then, had it continued. There were some applications that were continued a couple of times, not just for ACHD, but in some situations that was the case and what -- I just -- I guess the decision is really how important is it to us that the -- that the Planning and Zoning has that ACHD report. To them it's very important, but the question really is how important is it to us that they have it and do we want to -- this isn't just about Planning and Zoning, this is also affecting the public every time that something is continued and I became very -- I guess I just became Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 22 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 20 of 25 very sensitive to it, because it was happening more frequently than I thought was necessary and, again, you know, it does depend, like Caleb said, somewhat on the type of application that's coming through -- applications that are coming through, but we are seeing some fairly -- fairly large applications pretty frequently, so that -- that was the -- at least that's the background that I'm coming from with this, is that it's happening more often than I think that it should and I feel -- I felt like it was affecting our public. But, again, if the public isn't writing -- sending in written comments, then, I don't -- I don't know what to say about that. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: A couple questions for Caleb, but I think Council Member Perreault brings up a good point, something that I hadn't even considered. Would it be possible for the Planning and Zoning Commission with -- if they were to send a recommendation to the City Council that -- to include within that recommendation that it not be scheduled until an ACHD report was finalized? Is that something that they would have the authority to do in that request? Hood: So, Mr. Mayor, Councilman Cavener, certainly they -- they could. I think the issue that Council Woman Perreault brings up when she was a Planning and Zoning Commissioner is they weren't comfortable forwarding on a recommendation to you. They would continue it, so they had that information to forward on a fully baked recommendation to you. So, in your scenario they wouldn't get there, they aren't -- they aren't sending you things to try to figure out, they are trying to make a final recommendation. Perreault: Mr. Mayor, I will follow up on that if I may. Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: It's totally fine for us as Council to say, hey, Planning and Zoning, we appreciate very much that you want to have all the information and that you want to review these ACHD reports, but if we don't feel that it's necessary for them to do that or that's not something that we find value in, that's okay. I just think one way or the other we need to communicate that to them. If -- if we are good -- because I don't -- I can't think of any time that that -- we have had a hearing where Council didn't have the -- didn't have the report. It's mostly just not happening before P&Z. So, if we as Council don't feel like P&Z needs to do that and we can tell them don't sweat it, that's all right, too. We just, you know, want to figure that out and see where that value is. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 23 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 21 of 25 Cavener: Caleb, one other question for you. Regarding the acceptance of public testimony, is there a department efficiency that's gained by cutting off receiving written testimony three days before a public hearing? Hood: So, Mr. Mayor, Councilman Cavener, obviously, they only represent one department, but for Planning I would say no. The clerk -- I would ask the clerk, though, because they are probably the ones and then -- Cavener: It might have been -- it might be me, but I lost you, Caleb. Bernt: I think it's Caleb. Cavener: I don't think he's able to even hear us on that, so -- Simison: Councilman Cavener, I think -- if I remember correctly, you remember Twin Peaks and the dance of the dream man. That was pretty much it. Bernt: Cut his mic. He's done. Johnson: I'm trying. It's not allowing me -- Hood: -- do your job. Legal may also want to chime in on that one. Cavener: That's a great idea. Nary: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Mr. Nary. Nary: So, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, part of the reason we were supportive of this cutoff on written testimony is because it is sometimes very difficult to even be prepared for the decision makers when people submit things up to the beginning of the meeting, you know, and it doesn't happen very often and sometimes it's not usually very voluminous, but the reality is is something that's submitted at 5:00 o'clock for a 6:00 o'clock meeting, the like -- and it's longer than an e-mail, is not going to get read. It's just -- there is no time. So, it's really difficult to say from a record standpoint that you have really been able to review it and make it part of your decision. The reality is is you're not or you -- as has happened occasionally at P&Z where they have stopped the meeting, so they could go back and read it. Again, people can still testify, they can still come to the meeting and say their peace, it's just trying to put some finality to the written record, so that you can realistically have a chance to review it. Simison: And one of the things that we have talked about doing, just -- the Council President and I talked about moving towards setting the Council agendas on Wednesday and publishing them on Wednesday. That way the public has a few days more notice Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 24 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 22 of 25 about what's going to be prepared, if we move towards setting a date specific to have public comment stopped. Nary: And we picked the three days -- Mr. Mayor, sorry. We picked the three days, because with Council on Tuesday that means they would have, basically, until Saturday to submit it. So, they would have -- if we did get it out Wednesday, they had staff reports ahead of time, there would be adequate time to review it and, then, same thing with P&Z, with the meeting on Thursday, you back it up Wednesday, Tuesday, Monday, so they would have to submit it by the end of business Monday. So, the reality is is there is -- you're trying to give them time, but give the decision makers a true opportunity to review it. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton or -- Borton: One quick short question on that issue. Does that timeline apply to the applicant as well? Nary: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, it could. And, again, I think if -- if that's the direction -- because, again, the applicant will be at the meeting. The applicant is going to be able to present. So, I don't see it an issue with them as long as, again, staff reports ahead of time, so they are responding ahead of time, not getting a staff report on a Monday before a Tuesday meeting, I don't see a problem with that. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: So, we could say information can be received up until end of business Friday. However, you can continue to submit. However, we don't -- we don't guarantee that it will get read before a Council meeting on Tuesday? Is that what we are saying? Nary: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, if we -- it depends. If we put it in ordinance we will turn off the ability to submit anything in writing. So, they won't be able to submit it and it won't be part of the record. Simison: Mr. Nary, we -- we can't stop people from sending a-mails to the City Council. So, they are going to see them if they -- if they get them. Nary: Oh, that's true. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 25 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 23 of 25 Simison: It's just a matter of whether or not it will be included as part of the hearing record for consideration, is the best that we can do. But, yeah, we can't stop you from reading something that comes in after those dates. Nary: Mr. Mayor, I stand corrected. You're right. I mean if someone sends it to the Council Member directly and not through the clerk -- a clerk could shut off the ability to send it to the clerk, but, obviously, not to the Council. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: To that point that's I think where a lot of my hesitation on this comes from is unintended consequences where a citizen a-mails me, I don't see it before the meeting, and I don't -- I don't forward it to the clerk, are we keeping the proper record? I also, I think, struggle with telling the public that we are not going to accept public testimony. I think from an efficiency standpoint, if we had to draw a line, maybe 24 hours before the meeting, because, then, they have the opportunity to, then, come to the meeting. I don't get really excited, honestly, about the three day turn off period. I just think when it comes to stuff like this we want to be as open and available for public testimony and if something comes in and it is compelling, then, the decision makers will have that opportunity to do what it sounds like Planning and Zoning does and pause the meeting to review that. I just -- I'm always leery about limiting the opportunity to receive public testimony, written or in person. Hood: Is anyone else -- Mr. Mayor? Is anyone else interested in -- in maybe a 24 hour, instead of three day, or shall -- is the consensus to drop this and not even have it in the draft code and have a further discussion at public -- public hearings about this? Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: I'm interested in the -- in the Saturday cut off -- the three day cut off both for the applicant and the public and see how that discussion goes. If that comes up at a public hearing and we hear from folks who would like to participate at the 11th hour, but I would -- I think we can most effectively do our preparations if it's cut off. Simison: And I would just suggest from a practical standpoint what Councilman Cavener suggested, 24 to 48 hours -- why turn it off Saturday at noon? No one's going to -- from the clerk's office is going to do anything with that information until 8.00 a.m. on Monday at the earliest, you know, and I think that that could even be applied more reasonably to P&Z as well. So, Saturday afternoon cutoff makes no sense to me from a practical standpoint, but a 36 hour, 24 hour does. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 26 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 24 of 25 Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I do think a 24 hour cutoff makes a lot of sense to me. I think a 36 hour might be okay as well. The 24 hour seems to make a lot of basic sense of just having all the information in, time stamped at one time, fair to the applicant as well, to be able to review. The one thing I'm curious about if we moved to the 36 hour cutoff, I guess my only concern would be -- maybe it's just an independent issue, but I do think that getting that agenda out ahead of time becomes pretty critical and I'm worried it might crunch people a little too much still for just from a practical -- I don't -- I'm not involved too much in the agenda. Just from a practical standpoint is it possible to set the agenda like a full week ahead of time or how does that timing typically work? Simison: I think anything's possible and generally we have a general idea about our public hearings, because they would have already been technically posted from that standpoint. I think some of the other things are more questionable and some of the minor things that are typically on there, the final plats and those type of elements, may not be resolved by doing it that far out in advance. So, I have been struggling with this personally on this -- how far in advance does it really make sense, because I don't want to cry -- cry a foul of our noticing requirements, because once we put the agenda out just what we need to do to be consistent with state code in terms of amending our agenda when we put it out a week in advance or putting it out two weeks in advance really gives me hesitation. But anything's possible. Hood: So, Mr. Mayor, just in conclusion -- we are at time. That is the one -- up until this topic I thought I had pretty good direction and consensus from the Council. This one it seems like you're kind of all over the place on. Maybe I will circle back with you, Mr. Mayor, and my Council liaison and where we land in a 24 to three day type of thing if we want to move forward with this. I guess just in conclusion I would ask you to look at the pdf again, Proposed UDC Text Changes. There are a couple more that if you have any concerns with the yellow ones in particular -- I will just call a couple to your attention. Height in Old Town and Comp Plan map amendment timing. Please e-mail me that. If -- if you want to have more discussion before we potentially propose code changes, go into another workshop, I'm happy to do that, but I think I have generally what I need to move forward with some of these process changes and potential code changes. So, I appreciate your time over the last few weeks. Hoaglun: I will send you an e-mail, Caleb. I had a question on the -- for the daycare. Eleven -- eleven inch by 17 inch piece of paper. That one's always been bothering me. Why can't we make them a campaign sign which is 16 by 24, 18 by 24. 1 mean you want to be seen, but you want to be -- don't want to be obtrusive. To me that's kind of the yard sign size kind of fits that parameter. Kind of that meet in the middle. So, the four by four, yes, was overkill, but I was just having a heartburn over that 11 by 17 inch. So, anyway, just I wanted to throw that out. Hood: Okay. Thank you. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 27 of 284 Meridian City Council Work Session April 28,2020 Page 25 of 25 Simison: Council, any last comments at this point in time? Okay. If it's all right, just to give people a few minutes, we will try to reconvene and start the next meeting at 6:05 or do you people want to shoot for 6:00? Okay. We are just going to go right up at 6:00, so we have got ten minutes. So, with that do I have a motion? Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I move that we adjourn the meeting. Hoaglun: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to adjourn the meeting. Is there discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:49 P. M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 5 / 12 / 2020 MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 12,2020— Page 28 of 284 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 3.A. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item -Approve Minutes of April 14, 2020 City Council Work Session ATTACHMENTS: a Meeting Minutes Minutes 4/20/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 3 of 272 Meridian City Council Work Session April 14,2020 Page 23 of 23 Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to adjourn. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Simison: And we will start at 6:00 o'clock with the regular public hearing meeting. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:44 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 4 / 28 / 2020 MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 3.13. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item -Approve M inutes of April 14, 2020 City Council Regular Meeting ATTACHMENTS: An oa Meeting Minutes Minutes 4/20/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 27 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 61 of 61 Simison: You're good. If not, the clerk will call the roll. Roll call: Bernt, yea; Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, absent; Perreault, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion passes. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 7: Future Meeting Topics Simison: We have reached to Item 8. Future Meeting Topics. Is there any item for future meetings? If not, I will entertain a motion. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I move that we adjourn the meeting. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to adjourn the meeting. Any discussion on the Motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Simison: We are adjourned. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9.26 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 4 / 28 / 2020 _ MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 3.C. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item -Approve Minutes of April 21, 2020 City Council Work Session ATTACHMENTS: a Meeting Minutes Minutes 4/23/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 89 of 272 Meridian City Council Work Session April 21,2020 Page 26 of 26 MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:01 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 4 / 28 / 2020 MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 3.D. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item -Approve Minutes of April 21, 2020 City Council Regular Meeting ATTACHMENTS: Am oa Meeting Minutes Minutes 4/23/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 116 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 30 of 30 Simison: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Cavener: Move we adjourn. Hoaglun: Second. Simison: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:04 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 4 / 28 / 2020 MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 3.E. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item - Final Plat for Burlingame Subdivision No. 2 (H-2020-0034) by Engineerin Solutions LLP, Located at 1923 N. Black Cat Rd. Click Here for Application Materials A ATTACHMENTS: Descri ti Typ pload Staff Report Staff Report 4/23/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 147 of 272 STAFF REPORT C� W IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT !A H O DATE: 4/28/2020 Legend W TO: City Council Project Location FROM: Joseph Dodson,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 ® �� Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2020-0034 ` Burlingame Subdivision No. 2 PROPERTY LOCATION: _ The site is located at 1923 N. Black Cat a Rd.,in the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section p 4, Township 3N.,Range 1 W. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant is requesting Final Plat approval consisting of forty-five (45)building lots and ten(10) common lots on 10.49 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district. This is the second and final phase for the Burlingame Subdivision development. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 10.49 Future Land Use Designation MDR(Medium-Density Residential) Existing Land Use Residential/Agricultural Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family residential(SFR) Current Zoning ' R-8 Lots(#and type;bldg/common) 45 SFR, 10 Common Density(gross&net)l 4.29 Gross,6.74 Net Open Space(acres,total[%]/ 1.59 acres qualified at 15.2%(specific to this phase) buffer/qualified) Amenities Open grassy areas and pathways Physical Features(waterways, Settlers Canal runs along north property boundary hazards,flood plain,hillside) History(previous approvals) H-2018-0079(PP),Development Agreement Inst. #2018- 119406;H-2019-0080(phase 1 Final Plat). Page 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 148 of 272 B. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend _. Legend nProject Location High Deg�. � V%ProjectLocation meawm uensi _ Residential ResidentialET a 4: Office ® R Lo_wlDensity ® �� Rlesidential Zoning Map h Planned Development Map Legend RUT T g (1 Legend V � I IIProject Location i� �Project Location 1 City Limits —Planned Parcels a t a r �< �C VC RUT ® R-8 R1 -- R-2 ITIT I �II III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant AMH Development, LLC—280 Pilot Road, Ste. 200, Las Vegas, NV 89119. B. Owner: AMH Burlingame Development TRS, LLC— 30601 Agoura Rd., Suite 200, Agoura Hills, CA 91301 C. Representative: Becky McKay, Engineering Solutions, LLP— 1029 N. Rosario Street, Suite 100, Meridian, ID 83642 IV. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed final plat consists of 45 building lots and 10 common lots in the R-8 zoning district. The minimum lot size proposed is 5,504 square feet with an average lot size of Page 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 149 of 272 approximately 6,463 square feet. The total open space for this project is spread across two phases of development—approximately 1.59 acres of the approved 2.26 acres are proposed in this second phase in compliance with the approved preliminary plat. In addition, the multi- use pathway amenity is proposed with this phase of the project as depicted on the landscape plans (Exhibit Q. The other proposed amenity for this project(children's play structures) was built with phase 1 of development. NOTE: The proposed multi-use pathway resides within the Settler's Irrigation easement and cannot be landscaped with trees in accord with UDC requirements. The Applicant's landscape plan shows all other UDC landscape requirements to be met regarding the pathways. However, the Applicant will need to apply for Alternative Compliance to show alternative means of meeting the UDC requirements;Staff has recommended a condition of approval regarding this in Section VII of this report. Because the number of building lots and the amount of common open space is the same as in the approved preliminary plat, staff finds the proposed final plat to be in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required by UDC 1-6B-3C.2. V. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section VII of this report. Page 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 150 of 272 VI. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(dated: 07/11/18) LLI _smallnVS CHCOqH�0 aGmwo T9_ IOVINOOIH�INWd d07]A]C amim-7 —3 N m oismasas siKIMME1 Irk= T r-' E R �g 0 1, gg QID WN ja za. N C z U PHU i B5 R �W ;fi 04i VRO".", H gig.5 zl g.nvl I __T 1 T L sue___ ........... r 'HIP jjjj� J E L Page 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 151 of 272 B. Final Plat (dated: 03/02/2020) y= I € , a3° �� all a ail O w �c "¢ ^ qgg off i as §gym oil 15d; W a ��IR R 14 Via; - psi as€ `�s��a �"'�a�t WN!� ill l sew_ i"! �w m� � e�H�yes �- s OEM a a_f�>< e:��'sos�� �� a�p�� �� s aJ , l m o 3 pulp, ���= a�„kg �ow8't�kg W a� n4�������'�W� Caq H-' UP; Raw; eJUR e� q� € y! millIll": glmlo! aka in Ties BE m- I L � �`_� SIR o=n sw p���o �=s= a 11 X n =sWa F i 33�a.-' ss§a�a€€ffa�s=p rl 11sq w € 91 -,W I R dalm 'm-9 d1l 0:1 RE dui-N111i �>7 MON o plus f look a g �aN�€ � N� M D u - __nL 00 k �o U WrnmaiYJ WONLL'DN dR c Wy n 2 p9LLY n NJ „�t'?^A�� 5 Rim COME T � _ N �_�.` T- -— � oil 1 n�,ppsc Doss--,xx'99 W ,� W � �ra3AY a3XlA](1'N AIVeI_ J J.Ifi'SLl3.SY.[L'ONy.052a n� y Pom��� �.P➢Z01.'il5 i� J3.n i�9 ; (J _ g '.We '� � "wry g i, � # I � g it ie I "cD'Orr a '� -I .• M�Y.[COS [G: 1!'1� OJ $ -_i � � om eo I 4 to p g��M.� ,w� o���tt,oti �In �`='noxois�_ N � � � � �:, _.6o7oi - 8 m ism TnsI —- ssmr mgOxSru9 y0., b g I IM. �, = -- � M L 9�sin � K n99dWW- rOQm IOC -- ' s - - j- I USA . A 11 ., s till! en oo�a9- J_J � Anf _ _F^, s $ � � _ L.SLeBB 3.LL.lY.ON 6 �4L� --- assAL 3,¢A 3 Page 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 152 of 272 C. Landscape Plan TU a a3ry a s o 0 4 SNO11n7OS z11vHd -1h-v11111� ' WOOR dD SU-NANO Na3da�3n3atl ayiNoa aJnnrld „o,_ '��,� 9NI833N19N NOISIAIaUfIfg 3WV�NI'MEIL J � r = t_ n w 7 V w LL= pwd w OJ a tO A; ¢ u Nmm f„ _ y� s x Yl"111= W 0 CC Nil y € yy Q I i `--- II `�� I •1CW II I ,y F•a W 1<� w� WaQ 04 s L------ — --- -- ---- \� 1 —77 IC -I W I,�--- • -,- 4;�� - _ �,I��� ', .. �y; ' A I � L I CIO L - - - - - - - - - L - - - - - 'o I Page 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 153 of 272 ce cros)•a mu-®�(wel.a°n n° m g I -ufr,➢w+ gr1 p'e�e .m��.,•o� p,vs■s oixrsca x ,muss ec�r%��4ui m�r,Di R R e :m w nw x.'i io irrnu Nnp vry u�w.°i mn��we coi vs urvo A%oyen eco, enJ�ol�A�a� z 3StlHd-Nb'ld 3dtl�SON4'l `0 T s ioviNoola3NNrd f, ° E J cao�•3adosa3N,wc• d3ao,3n3a 91VI8331Y19N� xoisiniaans HNvaxlzana 1 p fig, V h T-- 1 m m dw - -� ° �� Ida e -r-�a __ / - 3 z� 3•8 F �o 0 0 e f w z ---------- d i l l�ii III a a s 8 & 6 m J 1 11 Illy) — ,I 01 Egap QE a Ps 228 g' s� 1 Wh :2Ri gull '111IFil at a. IF 1 <.� II 1'l it gB it_f' wlw J, W $, zlz I 41 I ',I aas q1t a acg§<� �t ea 1 ;< 'I.il 1; � 3{s %n493 $9&e���,gs 8P;6`"-''s- i F 1 F =v"= z $°3i g3PsS�a7yp Rai g Ws� �-, fit 3 g 9°�j3 4s � § • sss e 1 �� �� l�,ill ,, SP'i2 1 8a�� >,•`6 $ R --�ll—A `k��—�/ S emn8 P",. ES s4 S°•- eall y big 3 1 es �4` rll _1r Q S gals! °6g,9$ ��� 8�,1 tl IN �y_ E 4P 4 S 9�n L ` , l ,,,.✓ ;� %r�- €gee E• gA F e .t+��. fit• 7.1 ae v� Q a°33iiEz�ip �8°ae"� � 486 � Sp ? g Pad m c a° - - a 1 AdM„a3wMiNow 'N 1 0 1 j Z 0 p 1 s + R4 F a O GI y §o J mzC ® 1 Y im Ga La Page 7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 154 of 272 mS OI1117Os' l0H1NO3r J3NNVld NOISIAIasns MQVgm ff'Ma s J ck1o�3H�o SLANNON d3dcloucl 9NIURN 9N3 a 1 s lip §. ' mill -, —s '�'-"�� ,-'�` .. �` -`+�'� -�'- �SG' �' r-','•�.:_--� Y�- - r I 2� �f - � FILE .rcme d 4' I 0w4 '3hV a3VN000 V r �T � 7A7 4N1(111 'I I Q t ' 1 i z I 1 - - m 1� a zz k �1� a o, T m — A LW W a _ I � A�'PJ M - --- - �� W A .W ' I^�y I p .0i0 E I I a .. W a I I �� II , Z 1 .d q � - 1 eaM Aa3j I µ a ffo i dal 1�` CL w I M o 1CL # 1 _jj. ��� Page 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 155 of 272 w SHRUREP�NETAIL y BOULDER PLICEMENT NETAIL p� W .�N.. 9 u.�-•�� rr�o�sw�u ee rfaxm-� Eavn,cwwiaz� ��n<t si.4=t 2rt�c T uro.�emrev �� cw..e..ztn� r+ei, �a,E�[xvre w-ev pa_tl�s i P ok�"7°dati'-u Luc..u,rm 03�`� a E'g.. .ms �,aJ } ,t om a rams w Eo o €M, n o¢,���CC o0005 � v�pGo w,�E rc xxxE �xex RCONIFEROUSTREE,PIANTING EETPIL xHff 83Ei �saurH Page 9 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 156 of 272 D. Common Drive Exhibit EP .EP EP — EP —EP .EP.�EP EP 6' SEMI—PRIVATE FENCE, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS E -EP EP fP __P EP EP EP 15'REAR 15'REAR /V W r------ ------� F-----4-5'-----, I I I I I I I I W I BLOCK 5 I BLOCK 5 I I I 1 13C 1 11 I 10 9 I I I I w 1�j Ln Ln HOME ORIENTATION I a � I I HOME ORIENTATION I w + I I BEGIN FENCE (WILL NOT J I EXTEND PAST FRONT ' I PLANE OF DWELLING 9 :w L----- ---� } ACCE5S55 FROM w _ --45. WHITE ASH CT. 20'FRONT - - c N 20'FRONT 0 a cv W W 12C COMMON DRIVE EP EP a. EP EP �EP __ 20' �Ea - EP �EP __��FA 13C `'E+' W. WHITE ASH COURT 6' SEMI—PRIVATE FENCE, --� p SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS 1� iy 8 I BURLINGAME SUBDIVISION NO. 2 (COMMON DRIVE EXHIBIT) 1 " = 20' Page 10 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 157 of 272 VII. SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall comply with all applicable conditions of approval associated with this site: (H-2017-0055,Development Agreement Addendum Instrument No's. 2018-014051 and 2018- 119406; and H-2018-0079,Preliminary Plat). 2. Because the Phase 1 Final Plat has not received City Engineer signature as of this approval,the applicant has until November 20,2020,the date of approval for the Burlingame Subdivision Preliminary Plat(H-2018-0079),to obtain City Engineer's signature on the final plat for this phase or apply for a time extension in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 3. The final plat prepared by Engineering Solutions, dated 3/02/2020, shall be revised prior to City Engineer's signature as follows: • Include the ACHD License Agreement Instrument Number on Note#12 and in the legend. • Add a note to the Final Plat stating"Lots 21 and 22, Block 3, and Lots 1 and 13,Block 5 are subject to a public access easement for the multi-use pathway within them"and note that easement number. 4. Prior to City Engineer signature,the Common Drive Exhibit shall be corrected to depict an eight- foot setback along the western boundary of Lot 11, Block 5 to be consistent with the eight-foot easement in this location. 5. Prior to submittal of a final plat for City Engineer signature,the applicant shall submit public access easements for the multi-use pathways on Lots 21 and 22, Block 3, and Lots 1 and 13, Block 5. Submit easements to the Planning Division for Council approval and subsequent recordation. The easements shall be a minimum of 14' wide (10' pathway+2' shoulder each side). Use standard City template for public access easement. Easement checklist must accompany all easement submittals. Coordinate with Kim Warren from the City of Meridian Parks Department. 6. Prior to City Engineer signature of the final plat,the Applicant shall obtain Alternative Compliance approval for the landscape plan,due to trees not being allowed in the Irrigation District easement within the common lots on the west and north boundaries. 7. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer,the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster, at(208) 887-1620 for more information. 8. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat does not relieve the applicant of responsibility for compliance. 9. The applicant shall construct single family detached dwellings in accord with the recorded development agreements. 10. All fencing shall be installed in accordance with UDC 11-3A-7; the proposed semi-private fencing depicted on the landscape plan does not meet UDC requirements for fencing along common open space areas. VIII. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains Page 11 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 158 of 272 is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements,prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy,a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of Page 12 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 159 of 272 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans.This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility,or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed,and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at(208)888- 5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any Page 13 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 160 of 272 other applicable law or regulation. Page 14 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 161 of 272 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 3.F. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item - Final Order for Inglewood Place Subdivision No. 1 (H-2020-0028) by The Pointe at Meridian, LLC, Located at 3250 E. Victory Rd. 9&0 ATTACHMENTS: Description T loa Order Findings/Orders 4/22/2020 Exhibit A Exhibit 4/23/2020 Exhibit B Exhibit 4/22/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 162 of 272 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: APRIL 21, 2020 FINDINGS APPROVAL DATE: APRIL 28, 2020 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT ) CONSISTING OF TWO (2) ) CASE NO. H-2020-0028 BUILDABLE LOTS AND THREE (3) ) COMMON LOTS ON 8.84 ACRES ) ORDER OF CONDITIONAL OF LAND IN THE R-15 ZONING ) APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT DISTRICT FOR INGLEWOOD ) PLACE SUBDIVISION NO. 1 ) BY: JIM PETERSEN, THE POINT ) AT MERIDIAN, LLC ) APPLICANT ) This matter coming before the City Council on April 21, 2020 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) I 1-613-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of"PLAT SHOWING INGLEWOOD PLACE SUBDIVISION NO. 1, LOCATED IN THE SW '/4 OF THE SW '/4 OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2020, HANDWRITTEN DATE: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR INGLEWOOD PLACE SUB. 1 —FP H-2020-2028 Page 1 of 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 163 of 272 2/18/2020,by ROB O'MALLEY, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 3," is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated April 21, 2020, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked"Exhibit A" and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from John Carpenter, T-O Engineers, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked"Exhibit B" and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR INGLEWOOD PLACE SUB. 1 —FP H-2020-2028 Page 2 of 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 164 of 272 issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight(28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 28th day of April , 2020. By: Robert E. Simison Mayor, City of Meridian Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon the Applicant,Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 4-28-2020 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR INGLEWOOD PLACE SUB. 1 —FP H-2020-2028 Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORTC�WE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT f D A H 0 HEARING 4/21/2020 Legend DATE: ff Projeoi L-cofl-Rorti TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton,Development --- Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2020-0028 Inglewood Place Sub. 1 —FP,PS LOCATION: 3250 E.Victory Rd., in the SW 1/4 of CM Section 21,T.3N.,R.lE. (Parcel #S1121336501,#S1121336301, - #S1121336401 and#S1121336476) I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat consisting of two(2)buildable lots and three(3)common lots on 8.84 acres of land in the R-15 zoning district. This is the first of two phases of development for this project. This phase is proposed to develop as a senior living community. Private street approval is also requested for two(2)private streets on the east side of S. Titanium Ave. proposed to provide access to the independent living units. This is an administrative application and only requires approval of the Director,not City Council. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Owner: Jim Petersen, The Pointe at Meridian, LLC—4859 S. 190 W., Salt Lake City,UT 84107 B. Representative: Mathew Graham, T-O Engineers—332 Broadmore Way,Nampa, ID 83687 III. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the preliminary plat and associated conditions of approval as required by UDC 11-6B-3C.2. There is the same number of buildable lots and 2 additional common lots from that shown on the approved preliminary plat. The additional common lots consist of a street buffer along E. Victory Rd. on the west side of the public street(S. Titanium Ave.) and a lot for a pressure irrigation pump station that were required to be placed in common lots. Pagel Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 166 of 272 Because the number of buildable lots did not increase and the amount of common area is the same, Staff finds the proposed final plat is in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. As amenities for this development,the Applicant proposed to provide a gazebo with a gas fire pit and BBQ grill; details of these amenities are included in Section V.E. Staff has reviewed the private street request and found the proposed streets comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4; therefore,the Director has tentatively approved the request subject to the Applicant's completion of the items noted in UDC I I-3F-3 within one year. IV. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section VI of this report. The Director has approved the request for private streets subject to the conditions in Section VI of this report in accord with the Findings listed in Section VII. V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(date: 8/27/2019) PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR � INGLEWOOD PLACE SUBDIVISION xTGNMBHIP]HDF�M.Mc�tf.�OBDISE NEPoGIRN r'r "' 'PROJEG�VIE aeA 0 � wee Li. A D� „. ......� . cvu�e�xsmEnILL 14[-�J]I� ^^w � I ux,mm� rmmws .cmwe SNEET INGF]( =m anma :aMaun maim®® ��^ wmww 6 t unwm.ow �' _. :x ___ nr N ` wun..ww.w•w. mxrrwn I — '•..asuws. g II PH931NG 6ONMGIQ=VMPP O nNF.�nNo nor suYYnxr Z,.Ex ,�-.\ ��� f N� 0 •�'°"•°"`�' a LJ fA Z O O mrnwe a � NOTES A ��J 21 W '� uuamumaoaoxrnwwuo ewww.�10� � Z ��:::�,, o�..:�A,:m..,.n<„�. .,n„® .m,...� .w,.,� ,..:,:.m gym.. ,arw:,m iww xa ia�f`Ip'PO�Pm�• _ m CO.O Page 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 167 of 272 B. Final Plat(date: 2/18/2020) IING'LEWOOD PLACE SUBDIVISION NO, 1 ::r _4GhTE61N THE SWi48F THE 9W4 OF 9ECn9N 21, r:WhL51jry I WXITH W1SE I Eh5T"*F hEnId+N. --- 11 uE 9LIRslEY8R8 r{slaia.TI4E x C:We OF WER13Lkk ADA CO TT,1D*D - - 11F -,u! LTUE iW€irihEp - _ J. - c � —LTUE, }I,-�,-�'•,'y.""M1, a cn Ir - „ E,n LTuE L w ; !r M 1 CC! 0 F { I - !r F I __ I T {*T � � � J `Ec'F i`, s ;.Ic -�-I -- -I I I +� .+r• I I I 1--- LT,r-c• I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I IYIH4Li11 L'Li\I.II'1L i[L- 1 'ICT=E I �T x_IL L Iryx I r I I II II LL II x.1L 1 1 --J-j m r EIF Ira! I EI - life mK --rn G!2_TQ R - 1 e-eei� Iu1 -vrrr�e�cen 4Fel-�1 I1-T 1 -------- - - -.•.•-r-'�`— -"0.e e T� 1- r e 1 y :! �E ft rr-TT lout- nl 4,i,_I H"n yl ________________ry____--�} TT RR 1 1 ii - ,x 7a �F li le CT Iv I I !I ne 'ITI �CT1-s Te TRH F CI FT�TF. I I } 1 I I reE E o-rFIF--x n lal � LT r L, L r ,is ,s L.T T r I I H a I I I KE L e_ �e�r_`x 1 V 1 F 1 kT Fy��{_ SETT;yl ! E NE{T 1 I I { I ..3� x,�t, 1 �i___________--- 1 , r_ r,s n,.x_. ,T,r �. � . T.c T ,mup { FFF ____�� �s_.c��_Tr k; til 1 .{___�= F xE•L FitEln r1E- h+^CE_ _ I I 1 µ 1 1 .Tel r i,W.'-, I1'IT x I l�I I ___a_EKT es:nc. t- I i 1 3 777 1 1 I .Icokr7,F iL�clw�a �-- J- ��'_}��CJ. n r�',14:,Y S4r,N' I ai h �F a 2LQt'T-'_{*T518 orur+w�a; hYlL�r]NT R0.44 - MR lAWYIO .w IWOtiI}�LYIPFIL SHEE-NO.1 OF 3 Page 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 168 of 272 Think 11110111 NINE] MINIMUM IIIIIIIIIIII9I � lil Think el�le��me �©e��m oon��mo o® erje���e o®o ®memo e®m��ffl o.® ee Re ffle m ©®o r - er�e©wee eeee� ®e o0o®gym ME ®e ra r fir- �v-`°-...e ® y _ __ �z —1 r �• �J F V4�' �''w� -}------- - ------------------------------ --- - -- --- 1- SENIOR FACUrY PLANI Ll 12 NG urron M1BLEYlg181fEElWIRMG�\ SHI16lINIINGn �� - -n-. —�__ -LVEEGIi�i>�E luwnxcn PEleriiu luxilxc/1 �� coxcELn lIANIEE EocE is•. - �"••••-�� EAGLE ROAD -r'- RET�L PM RF-AIL PP➢ ` � - y a r NORTH m��_ CCMMERCK I0FFICE PLAWw- C L 113 Page 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 170 of 272 D. Private Street Plan&Fire Department Approval _ �.r��-.�-ter a-.xs�wfll+�rrnnd-*vA+avai� d +•i ■ EMHMD&A� 'IK1Y'pPMA�YI/]IIQL'altll�4 r• i Y Aam- r II i I ' 4 i Page 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 171 of 272 Joe Bongiorno 'Graham,Mathew;■Sonya Allen;■Adrienne Weatherly;■Chris Johnson;■Charlene Way - t RE:Private Road Approval-Inglewood private rds.pdf [112�--.MB1nMgleewood Mathew-You r p nvate la nes a re a p proved. Comments: Addressing:This project will require private streets.The applicant will work with the addressing agent for this project.All private streets shall be signed on both sides of the roadway"No parking Fire Lane"per International Fire Code 5033&D103.6 unless approved by the Fire I�Aarshal. D103.6 Signs.Where requftvd by the fire rode official,fire apparauts access roads shall be marked with permanent NO PARKING—FIRE LANE signs complying with Figure D103.6.Signs shall have a nrininnan dimension of 12 inches (305 mar)wide by 18 hicks(457 nun)high and have red let- ters on a white reflective background, Sighs shall be pasted on one or both sides of the fine apparatus road as required by Section D 103.6.1 or D103.6.2. SIGN TYPE"N' SIGN TYPE"C" SIGN TYPE"D" NO NO NO T PARKING PARKING PARKING FIRE LANE FIRE LANE FIRE LANE 18 L.7►J 1-12- FIGURE D103.6 FIRE LANE SIGNS Arrienne-would you please put this in the public record?A-2020-OD53 Inglewood Place Senior Housing-DES,CZC Joe Bongiorno CFI,CFEI Deputy Chief-Fire Marshal Meridian Fire 33 E.Broadway Ave.,Ste.210,Meridian,ID 83642 (Direct)208-489-0458(Cell)208-936 9554 Page 7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020- Page 172 of 272 E. Detail of BBQ Pavilion&Fire Pit Site orneflities far1nglewood Place Subdivision 2A' Square Picnic Shelter Architecture ICOrJShelterSystems,Inc- as represented by: Big T recreation Draper Utah ao 1.572-0732 LonL#oapr Amhltocturrr l;no pl�Lrynlr.rj •ic�silvskon Manv9rmsrlt Iniamx f]Pmgr. Li 4 Iw• Model:SO24WP6-45-1C0-150 Square Shelter with Multi-Rib Roof Paneks and Custom Powdercoat Color. Colors to be determined by Owner. The standafd roof pitch is 6:12. Optional pitches range from 3:12 to 12:12. Roof deck: 24 ga.Steei Panel, 24 ga. Steel Standing Seam,2t6 Tongue&Groove or Structural Wood Panel Roofing materials:24 ga.Stee€Panels,24 ga.Stee] Standing Seam,Asphalt Shingles or Cedar Shingles Single Roof Configuration: All Sizes Two-tier Vented or Clerestory Roof Configuration:All 5¢es Three-Tier Vented or Clerestory Raof ConfigWation- Additional information available at w w-iconsheliters.com Rectangle Fire Pit 9191 90r3 gan SUILu 20[F Ole Salt take City Utah Salt Like City,Llrah 64117 1 936- 99 001-269.0055 Www tRLnkaeL.CCIl:I Page 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 173 of 272 See attached product sheets_ Please not this product can be customized to be bust to a desired size_ d016 RECTANGLE FIRE PIT PRODUCT 0T OURBOM:The RKIAMGLE RRE PIT highlgha stook linos whh roc 4 glue punoLs f—odd on okgarrt reuol ahrnom.Thc f-pir nror he rirrad for moat gas or EcoS—bnodro not. 132 Pi-pm Are eu Gorden Levrl Sdt Lake City.Lrr T411131 CA.UTIOH:Foam collar opwadng imrucriom cororullf.Freprrs ore Tar autcloarim—rii rrco orrFr. info@ore.design I BOI.936.6194 4616AECTANGURREPM WEIC44T:115Ib.Smo11591ka.AArrni—CAFNQTY:g.3 it UMENSM:A3'Lx N9NxIdrH r5mrdord hluk gmro pmjL pink purpkk tad—?uoisalkwhim "mniutn Glue Rmk(I.5'.-1'glussrockr dmp.Amilubkaalarsinclude:N4pAD m" ngo flora Ro�:Y-Y,mrurd huff tGrQira Tap add opprairnordT79 Ibs m dw final woigln. Fanned oT ordrorstmlaralumiruny mrtonminam and o dcar prod=are shaped,wddod,powdocaarod(asd&md� and packogodmduim0far Ores irdapondentrnonufxariN fooli y in Suk Lake Chy.Lhoh. Forrnaro indorraaory pham conmaywrGm Pajeo Mrt-yu_ OPFI)NS: * f ® 46 Q ' = f _ UGHr nJMk lON - - nnrrr axunx 1✓� �� 4P161 Racmngla Fro Ph it Smndud Powder Crux Chormd Gsxrf �.21✓ 1✓r _ U.1 I I J LEEO'PCDM: TO SPEM TM PRODLUT: 1)Manoml Conmm 2)bm or Erximrvoonrd Guaky-Mornrt ring 1)1 odicnte product norm.prodicr numho4 description,ord sha. 3�Ir door ErMan—1 Odhy-Lw VX0 A)hfomriol Rosso 2)Select mororiol:rc Fdad s L COILTEN,or nrcyckd olumnum.ITr--rdW K 5�P—irhy snarl or okrrnnum is specified,sekar powdar-coor mkx Dr—I P.-am finish. 3)rakcr product-spocificoprions.3mrxford options—rhe viarod at Rod poina arh urod will vtry m-rdig m mm"ah and drstnodam W LEGAL BSU MADOM: ALL RICirTS R1 KWID.IMFORMATKM IN THIS OOC4.FAEMF ISGMRDWWANO IS 291US1YE PROKITTY GF ORE IMOORPORATEO. r OELNERY OF THIS DOCUMENT ORAMY OOPY THEREOF OR OISCLO&AIE OF SLICH INFORMATION TO LIMALMORUEO PFILO11,1515 POMDOEN � W ITHM r EXPRESSED WWTTEM PERMISSION OF ORE NC. IRT Page 9 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 174 of 272 @�� 4O14 RECTANGLE FIRE PIT S-m..d Opfimrihe RECTANGLE FIRE PIr moy be fitted with the optima 6e lox.Vfhil,fire pit di—mms da r thmge with—h 137 Rerpart Avenue,Gorden Level option,there moy be-:rotims on the mP:7 when selecting your homer.Oor Project Mono 9— m m hosW m discuss odditim" Soh Luke City,UT U101 options to oonyplernerrt yorr homer selectin- infoforc.design I BIA.955.6694 Pk—n that firxpits ors for r md.use only,segordkss of b--sek�ion. —des CSA CERTIFIED MATC H LIT BURNER •' PILOTLESS REMOTE ELECTRONICIGNIIION ' �.�. N f GLASS SURROUND LLI 1 � IWIi9EVAO1 ■dREiEW[}I R.YI U- W J to Z H L7 AR1d I Rrco,ylr Firs'k i LE�,k.-^IP.Rhid"IOM1: W P_,�,, r.CF_r_71-c" '•:ORM4T.RNNS DOCUMEW IS CONFlDE.AN615 M l6NEPkDKRTTOFOREIHCORPORATEO- - - - - iav�N ENTCQAHT LOPI'TNERWF OR DISCLOSl.11E OFSl.OiINF9RMATION TOUHAUINORQE6F4A.tCN515 FOIIBIOOEN W IT6aA EXPRESSED WAITIEN PERMISSKM OF DRE INC- 'Q 0 14_ 4 J I Page 10 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 175 of 272 VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development [H-2019-0090(DA#2019-124424)]. 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of City Council's approval of the preliminary plat(by November 26,2021)in accord with UDC 11-6B-7 in order for the preliminary plat to remain valid; or, a time extension may be requested. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat shown in Section V.B prepared by Rob O'Malley,T-O Engineers, stamped on 2/18/2020 by, shall be revised as follows: a. Note #3: Correct the width of the easements noted in parenthesis or as spelled out (as applicable). b. Note#5: Include the recorded instrument number for the existing City of Meridian sanitary sewer and water main easement. c. Note #6: Include Lot 3, Block 2 as a common lot. Modify the ingress/egress easement portion of the note to accurately reflect which lots have such an easement and graphically depict the easement on the plat. d. Note#8: Include the recorded instrument number for the ACHD sidewalk easement. e. Note #10: "Direct Lot access to E. Victory Road is prohibited unless approved by Ada f. Change the name of Everglade Lane to E. Beamer Lane as required by the Ada County Street Name Review letter. g. Change the name of name of Cedar Crest Lane to E. Shergar Lane as required by the Ada County Street Name Review letter. h. Include a note on the plat stating Lot 2, Block 2 is for a pressure irrigation pump station and shall be owned by the entity that owns and maintains the PI system in accord with UDC 11-313-6E. i. Depict the private streets within common lots as set forth in UDC 11-3F-4A.1; these lots shall provide access to all properties/homes served by such private streets. One(1)full-size copy of the revised plat shall be submitted prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 5. The landscape plan shown in Section V.C, dated 1/9/20, prepared by Troy R. Sanders, Think Architecture, shall be revised as follows: a. Depict a gate at the east end of the northern boundary of the site for access to the pump on the adjacent property to the north by the property owner to the north as required with the preliminary plat(condition#A.3e). One(1)full-size copy and one(1) electronic copy of a revised landscape plan shall be submitted prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Page 11 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 176 of 272 6. One(1)building permit is allowed to be issued for the nursing/residential care facility on Lot 1,Block 1 (depicted on the preliminary plat as Lot 1,Block 2)prior to subdivision of the property. 7. The Applicant shall work with Staff and ACHD to implement traffic calming signage and/or safety measures on the public street (S. Titanium Ave.) entering the site from Victory Rd. to assist with pedestrian safety prior to application for signature on the final plat. Confirmation of approval from ACHD for such traffic calming shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 8. Approval shall be obtained from ACHD for the point of connection of the private streets to the public street (S. Titanium Ave.) as set forth in UDC 11-3174A.2. Confirmation of approval from ACHD for such shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 9. The private streets shall be signed on both sides of the street "No Parking Fire Lane" per International Fire Code 503.3 & D103.6 and the curb next to the drive aisle shall be painted red in accord with UDC 11-3F-413.2d. 10. Signage for addressing shall be provided at the public street(S. Titanium Ave.) for the multi- family (duplex style) homes for emergency wayfinding purposes; coordinate with Land Development(Terri Ricks or Ryan Beecroft)and Fire Department(Joe Bongiomo). 11. The Applicant or Owner shall obtain final approval of the private streets within this development within one(1)year of approval of the Order for this application by completing the tasks listed in UDC 11-317-3. Upon completion of these items,the Applicant shall submit proof of completion to the Planning Division and the Director shall issue a letter stating that the private street has been approved. No building permit shall be issued for any structure using a private street for access to a public street until the private streets have received final approval. 12. Amenities(gazebo with a fire pit and BBQ grill) shall be provided consistent with the detail in Section V.E. 13. All existing structures on this site are required to be removed prior to signature on the final plat phase in which they are located. 14. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer,the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster, Sue Prescott, at 887-1620 for more information. 15. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions: 1. A Street Light Plan will be required with the submittal of the civil construction plans. Streetlights on Victory Road shall be Type 1 and metered. Plan requirements can be found in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. 2. Public Works prefers the water line ending in a hydrant at the northwest corner to be eliminated if the main is not necessary. We also prefer the two dead end water mains on the east side of the proeprty to be eliminated or they must end in a hydrant instead of a blow off. Page 12 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 177 of 272 3. The sanitary sewer flow from this property shall be directed to the existing mainline that flows toward S. Eagle Raod per the Site Plan submitted with the Preliminary Plat Map dated 7/29/2019 by John Carpenter,PE. 4. A 14-foot wide compacted gravel access road shall be installed along the entire length of the existing sewer main along the north boundary. This road is intended to provide access to the Meridian Public Works Department for the operation and maintenance of the sanitary sewer mainline only, and it is not intended to provide vehicular access to the neighboring property to the north. 5. The private streets shall be constructed in accord with the roadway and storm drainage standards of the transportation authority or as approved by the City of Meridian based on plans submitted by a Certified Engineer as set forth in UDC 11-3F-4B.2a. General Conditions: 6. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development.The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department,and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 7. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 8. All improvements related to public life,safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 9. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff,the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 10. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 11. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 12. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City.The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. Page 13 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 178 of 272 13. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life,non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 14. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 15. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 16. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 17. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 18. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 19. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 20. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 21. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 22. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 23. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 24. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2" x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 25. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that Page 14 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 179 of 272 may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 26. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non- domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 27. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 28. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 9-1-28.C.1).The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 29. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. VII. REQUIRED FINDINGS Private Street(UDC 11-3F-5) In order to approve the application,the Director shall find the following: A. The design of the private street meets the requirements of this article; The Director finds the design of the proposed private streets as shown in Section V.D meets the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4. B. Granting approval of the private street would not cause damage,hazard, or nuisance, or other detriment to persons,property, or uses in the vicinity; and The Director finds damage, hazard, nuisance or other detriment will not be caused to persons, property or uses in the vicinity by granting approval of the private streets. C. The use and location of the private street shall not conflict with the comprehensive plan and/or the regional transportation plan. (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) The Director finds the proposed use and location of the private streets will not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and/or the regional transportation plan. D. The proposed residential development(if applicable)is a mew or gated development. (Ord. 10- 1463, 11-3-2010, eff. 11-8-2010) The Director finds this finding is not applicable as it's a multi family, not a single-family development. Page 15 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 180 of 272 EXHIBIT B From: Carpenter,John To: Sonya Allen;Adrienne Weatherly;Charlene Wav;Chris Johnson Cc: Bruce Freckleton; Bill Parsons;Graham,Mathew;Jim Peterson(iim(agoldstream.us) Subject: RE: Inglewood Place Sub. 1-FP H-2020-0028 Staff Report for April 21st Council Mtg Date: Tuesday,April 21,2020 3:58:40 PM Attachments: imaae007.ona image008.p_ng imaae009.Dna image010.p_ng imaae011.Dna image012.p_ng imaae019.Dna External Sender - Please use caution with links or attachments. Sonya, We are in agreement with the Staff report. Please proceed along with City Council. Thanks, JOHN G. CARPENTER, P.E. I Nampa Office Manager, Project Manager 0071 'r-0 EIUaINEIERS 332 N. Broadmore Way I Nampa, Idaho 83687 0 208-442-6300 1 C 208-899-0688 www.to-engineers.com co ®. r ■ 1 NAMPA.PC I CGaM ■ I SPOKANEWAa BUILT ON SOLID GROUND WE'RE HIRING!CLICK HERETO V151T OUR CAREER5 PA-GE From: Sonya Allen <sallen@meridiancity.org> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 1:17 PM To: Adrienne Weatherly<aweatherly@meridiancity.org>; Charlene Way<cway@meridiancity.org>; Chris Johnson <cjohnson@meridiancity.org> Cc: Bruce Freckleton <bfreckleton@meridiancity.org>; Bill Parsons<bparsons@meridiancity.org>; Carpenter,John <jcarpenter@to-engineers.com>; Graham, Mathew<mgraham@to-engineers.com> Subject: Inglewood Place Sub. 1 - FP H-2020-0028 Staff Report for April 21st Council Mtg Attached is the staff report for the proposed final plat for Inglewood Place Sub. 1.This item is scheduled to be on the City Council consent agenda on April 21st. The meeting will be held at City Hall, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, beginning at 6:00 pm. Please call or e-mail with any questions. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 181 of 272 Matt— If you are not in agreement with the provisions in the staff report, submit a written response to the staff report to the City Clerk's office (cityclerk(@meridiancit)l.org) and me as soon as possible and the item will be placed on the regular agenda of a subsequent meeting for discussion. Thanks, Sonya Allen I Associate Planner City of Meridian I Community Development Dept. 33 E. Broadway Ave., Ste. 102, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-884-5533 1 Fax: 208-489-0578 C4fE ID� Built for Business, Designed for Living 0®©00 All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in regards to both release and retention,and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law. Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a safer and more useful place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more Click Here. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 182 of 272 C-/WE IDIAN-- ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item - 3.G. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Hill's Century Farm North (H-2019- 0134) by Martin L. Hill, Hill & Hill Properties, Located at the Southeast Corner of S. Eagle Rd. and E.Amity Rd. ATTACHMENTS: Description T Uploa Findings Findings/Orders 4/22/2020 Exhibit A Exhibit 4/22/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 183 of 272 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI DIAN AND DECISION& ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Modification to the Existing Development Agreement for Hill's Century Farm Commercial(H-2018-0127,Inst.#2019-033207)to Update the Conceptual Development Plan and Certain Provisions of the Agreement to Allow for the Development of a Self- Service Storage Facility and Retail/Professional Office Uses where Single-Family Residential Uses are Currently Approved; Rezone of a Total of 39.9 acres of Land from the R-8 Zoning District to the C-N(4.9 acres),C-C (4.35 acres),and R-15 (30.65 acres)Zoning Districts; Preliminary Plat Consisting of 147 Building Lots and 18 Common Lots on 43.02 Acres of Land in the R-8,R-15, C-N and C-C Zoning Districts; Planned Unit Development for an Age-Restricted 55 and Older Gated Community with Deviations from Certain Development Standards; and Conditional Use Permit for a 73,730 Square Foot 443-Unit Self-Service Storage Facility on 3.89 Acres of Land in the C-C Zoning District by Martin L.Hill,Hill& Hill Properties. Case No(s). H-2019-0134 For the City Council Hearing Date of: April 21,2020 (Findings on April 28,2020) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 21,2020, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 21,2020, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 21,2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 21,2020,incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian,which was adopted April 19, 2011,Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH—ALT,CUP,MDA,PUD,PP,RZ,PS H-2019-0134 - 1 - Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 184 of 272 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 21,2020, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for conditional use permit,development agreement modification, planned unit development,preliminary plat and rezone is hereby approved per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of April 21,2020,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years.Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again (UDC 11- 6B-7C). Notice of Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit,when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time,the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH—ALT,CUP,MDA,PUD,PP,RZ,PS H-2019-0134 -2- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 185 of 272 conditional use permits that also require platting,the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two(2)year period. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-513-6.G.1,the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one(1)two (2)year period.Additional time extensions up to two (2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11(UDC 11-513-6F). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28)days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of April 21,2020 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH—ALT,CUP,MDA,PUD,PP,RZ,PS H-2019-0134 -3- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 186 of 272 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH—ALT,CUP,MDA,PUD,PP,RZ,PS H-2019-0134 -4- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 187 of 272 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 28th day of April 2020. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED AYE COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED AYE MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED ------ (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 4-28-2020 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH-ALT,CUP,MDA,PUD,PP,RZ,PS H-2019-0134 -5- EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORTC�WE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT f D A H 0 HEARING April 21,2020 nd DATE: ff Lege LIProject Lacfli�ar TO: Mayor&City Council rflu FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 r Bruce Freckleton,Development Services Manager x 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2019-0134 Hill's Century Farm North - LOCATION: Southeast corner of S. Eagle Rd. and E. -- Amity Rd., in the SW 1/4 of Section 33, T.3N.,R.IE " I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant requests approval of the following applications: • Modification to the existing development agreement for Hill's Century Farm Commercial(H- 2018-0127,Inst. #2019-033207)to update the conceptual development plan and certain provisions of the agreement to allow for the development of a self-service storage facility and retail/professional office uses where single-family residential uses are currently approved; • Rezone of a total of 39.9 acres of land from the R-8 zoning district to the C-N(4.9 acres), C-C (4.35 acres),and R-15 (30.65 acres)zoning districts; • Preliminary plat consisting of 147 building lots and 18 common lots on 43.02 acres of land in the R-8,R-15, C-N and C-C zoning districts; • Planned unit development for an age-restricted 55 and older gated community with deviations from certain development standards; • Conditional use permit for a 73,730 square foot 443-unit self-service storage facility on 3.89 acres of land in the C-C zoning district; • Private streets for access to single-family attached and detached units in a gated development; and, • Alternative compliance to UDC 11-3F-4A.4b to allow 124 units accessed off private gated streets; and to 11-3F-4A.6 to allow 2 common driveways off private streets. Page 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 189 of 272 II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 43 Existing/Proposed Zoning R-8(Medium-Density Residential)and C-N (Neighborhood Business) Future Land Use Designation MU-N(Mixed Use—Neighborhood) Existing Land Use(s) Vacant/agricultural land,(2)single-family homes and a cell tower Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family residential,self-service storage facility and retail/office Lots(#and type;bldg./common) 147 buildable lots/18 common lots Phasing Plan(#of phases) 4 phases(2 residential&2 commercial) Number of Residential Units(type 137 single-family attached and detached of units) Density(gross&net) 4.07 units/acre(gross);7.28 units/acre(net) Open Space(acres,total 5.55 acres(16.4%) [%]/buffer/qualified) Amenities 2 amenities required;a clubhouse,swimming pool, segment of the multi-use pathway system,and outdoor activity complex(specific amenities in this area are to be determined at CZC review o the clubhouse)are proposed Physical Features(waterways, None hazards,flood plain,hillside) Neighborhood meeting date;#of November 14,2019; 5 attendees(see sign-in sheet attendees: included in application) History(previous approvals) CPAM-15-001,AZ-15-004(DA#2015-061375);H-2016- 0092(MDA#2016-119080);H-2018-0087(CUP for cell tower);H-2018-0127(MDA-2"d Addendum to DA #2019-033207) B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Yes(a Traffic Impact Study was not required) • Requires ACHD No Commission Action (yes/no) Access Access is proposed from the west via S.Eagle Rd. (W.Rockhampton (Arterial/Collectors/State St.)and from the north via E.Amity Rd. (S. Tavistock Ave.),both Hwy/Local)(Existing and arterial streets; from the south via S.Wayland Ave.,a local street;and Proposed) from the east via Hill Park St. Traffic Level of Service Better than"E"(Acceptable level of service for a 2-lane principal/minor arterial is"B") Stub Stub streets are proposed to be extended into this site from the south Street/Interconnectivity/Cros boundary(S.Wayland Ave.)and from the east boundary(Hill Park St.— s Access _ approved but not yet constructed) Existing Road Network None 1 Existing Arterial Sidewalks/ None Buffers Proposed Road Amity Rd.:Widen pavement to 17' from centerline&construct 5' Improvements detached sidewalk 36' from centerline Page 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 190 of 272 Description Details Page Eagle Rd.:Widen pavement to 17' from centerline&construct 5' detached sidewalk 41' from centerline Distance to nearest City Park Hillsdale City Park is in the development process at the project's east (+size) boundary Fire Service • Distance to Fire Station 1.8 miles • Fire Response Time 3:00 minutes(under ideal conditions)from Station#4 • Resource Reliability 78%-does not meet the target goal of 80%or greater • Risk Identification 1 and 3—current resources would be adequate to supply service the proposed project • Accessibility Meets all required access,road widths&turnarounds • Special/resource needs Aerial device not required • Water Supply Residential requires 1,000 gallons/minute for one hour; Storage requires 1, ons/minute for two hours Police Service • Distance to Police 4 miles Station • Police Response Time Priority 3 3:48 Priority 1 7:09 Priority I 10:42 • Calls for Service 257(in RD `M779') • %of calls for service %of P3 US 0.78% split by priority %of P2 US 51.75% %of PI CFS 37.74% %of PO US 9.73% • Crimes 14(in RD `M779') • Crashes 6(in RD `M779') West Ada School District • Distance(elem,ms,hs) Enrollment capacity i es Dew,to schoo • Capacity of Schools *Silver Sage Elementary" 307 405 4.6 miles • #of Students Enrolled Lake Hazel Middle School 1085 1000 1.9 miles Mountain View High School 2262 2400 4.1 miles Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Directly adjacent to site Services • Sewer Shed South Black Cat trunkshed • Estimated Project Sewer See application ERU's • WRRF Declining 13.82 Balance • Project Consistent with Yes WW Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impact/Concerns Manholes cannot be located in landscaped areas unless they are located within an access road per City standards provided. Water • Distance to Water Directly adjacent to site Services • Pressure Zone 4 Page 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 191 of 272 Description Details Page • Estimated Project Water See application ERU's • Water Quality None • Project Consistent with Yes Water Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns A portion of the proposed 8"water main will need to be upsized to 12". The reason for the 12" size is for future abandonment of the existing 12" in Eagle Road due to avoiding utilities crossing the roundabout at the Amity intersection. C. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend � Leg-end i 0 Pro"ec- Lxa-or lei Project LacaIion AWUiurn Densely - ideRtlal uLJ W id till udhu+� LdV iden ial Zoning Map Planned Development Map Legend RU! R 0 Legend Pro"ea Lcca=or ,ys.R.;- RU letProjevTLflca�iar +_i City Limit - 3R-- 78 —iilw. — Planned Pnime s R- RUT R HE -C � RS, T RUT RUT RUT R= R- � I � RUT RUTrR R . _R- ..AFAR RUT a Page 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020- Page 192 of 272 Note: The subject property also includes a 172'x 709'+1-remnant piece of R-8 zoned land on the northern portion of the east side of the site(not included in the selected area on the above maps) that was left out of the preliminary plat for Hill's Century Farm Commercial Subdivision to the east(see zoning map above with arrow pointed toward referenced area). This area was allowed to be included in a future plat with the property to the west(i.e. the subject property). III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Martin L. Hill,Hill& Hill Properties—3625 E. Amity Rd., Meridian, ID 83642 B. Owner: Same as Applicant C. Representative: Michael D. Wardle,Brighton Corporation—2929 W.Navigator Dr.,Meridian, ID 83642 IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Notification published in 2/14/2020 4/6/2020 newspaper Notification mailed to property owners within 300 feet 2/11/2020 4/6/2020 Applicant posted public hearing 3/8/2020 4/8/2020 notice on site Nextdoor posting 2/11/2020 4/8/2020 V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS(Comprehensive Plan) (Note: This project was submitted prior to the new Comprehensive Plan being adopted; therefore, this project will be reviewed under the previous Plan) The Future Land Use Map(FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Mixed Use—Neighborhood(MU-N). The purpose of the Commercial designation is to assign areas where neighborhood-serving uses and dwellings are seamlessly integrated into the urban fabric. The intent is to avoid predominantly single- use developments by incorporating a variety of uses.Land uses in these areas should be primarily residential with supporting non-residential services.Non-residential uses in these areas tend to be smaller scale and provide a good or service that people do not travel far for(approximately one mile) and need regularly. Employment opportunities for those living in the neighborhood are encouraged. Connectivity and access between non-residential and residential land uses is particularly critical in MU-N areas. Tree-lined,narrow streets are encouraged. Developments are also encouraged to be designed according to the conceptual MU-N plan depicted in Figure 3-1 in the Comprehensive Plan. Residential densities should comprise a minimum of 40% of the development area at densities ranging from 6 to 12 units/acre. The majority of the site(more than the minimum 40%) is proposed to development with single-family residential attached and detached homes at a gross density of 4.07 units/acre;the remainder of the site is proposed to develop with non-residential services consisting of a self-service storage facility and commercial retail/office uses. Although multi-family or duplexes aren't proposed as a transition Page 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 193 of 272 between single-family homes and the commercial uses as depicted on the conceptual MU-N plan in the Comprehensive Plan, attached dwellings on smaller lots are proposed along the northern shared boundary. Although Staff would prefer more of a transition in uses in this area,the required 25' wide landscaped buffer on the commercial property and the 6' tall cedar fence proposed along the residential boundary will assist in buffering the residential from the commercial uses. The north phase of the residential area will have narrow(i.e. 29')tree-lined streets. The storage facility will provide a needed service for area residents and the commercial uses should provide employment opportunities and services for residents in the area. Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this application and apply to the proposed use of this property(staff analysis in italics): • "Provide for a wide diversity of housing types(single-family,modular,mobile homes and multi- family arrangements) and choices between ownership and rental dwelling units for all income groups in a variety of locations suitable for residential development."(3.07.03B) The proposed mix of single family attached and detached homes with standard and age qualified (SS+) options will contribute to the variety of housing types available in the City. • "Provide housing options close to employment and shopping centers."(3.07.02D) The proposed development will provide housing options in close proximity to office and commercial uses planned to develop in this area. • "Require open space areas within all development."(6.01.01A) An open space exhibit is included in Section VIII.G that complies with the minimum UDC standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3. • "Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is contiguous to the City."(3.01.0117) The proposed development is currently within the City and urban services can be provided to this development. • "Restrict private curb cuts and access points on collectors and arterial streets."(3.06.02D) One(1)public street access (W. Rockhampton St) is proposed via S. Eagle Rd. and one (1) public street access (S. Tavistock Ave) is proposed via E.Amity Rd. Staff is of the opinion the proposed accesses shown in Section HITE are acceptable unless otherwise restricted by the City Council and/or ACHD. • "Require pedestrian access connectors in all new development to link subdivisions together to promote neighborhood connectivity as part of a community pathway system."(3.03.03B) Detached sidewalks are proposed throughout the development along internal local streets and adjacent to abutting arterial streets (i.e. Eagle Rd. &Amity Rd.). There are no pathway connections to this development from the south except for the sidewalk along the stub street to this property.A pathway stub is proposed to the commercial portion of the development to the north for interconnectivity.A micro path connection is also proposed mid-block at the west boundary of the site connecting to the sidewalk along S. Eagle Rd. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in all Mixed Use areas,per the Comprehensive Plan(pgs.23-24): (Staffs analysis in italics) • "Residential densities should be a minimum of six dwellings/acre." The gross density for the overall residential portion of the development is 4.07 units per acre with a net density of 7.28 units per acre, which is consistent with the density range in the Development Agreement of 4 to 8 units/acre (net)previously approved for this project. Page 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 194 of 272 • "Where feasible,higher density and/or multi-family residential development will be encouraged, especially for projects with the potential to serve as employment destination centers and when the project is adjacent to US 20/26, SH-55, SH-16 or SH-69." Medium density single-family residential uses are proposed; this project is not adjacent to a State Highway although it is within a mile of E. Lake Hazel Rd., a mobility corridor. • "A conceptual site plan for the entire mixed-use area should be included in the application." A conceptual development plan was submitted for the proposed mixed use development, included in Section VIII.C. • "In developments where multiple commercial and/or office buildings are proposed(not residential),the buildings should be arranged to create some form of common,usable area, such as a plaza or green space." Staff recommends the future buildings in the retail/professional office area are arranged in accord with this provision. To ensure future consistency with this provision,Staff recommends a concept plan for that overall area is submitted prior to the City Council hearing that demonstrates how this will be accomplished. • "The site plan should depict a transitional use and/or landscaped buffering between commercial and existing low-or medium-density residential development." There are no existing residential uses, only proposed residential uses, adjacent to the commercial portion of the development; a minimum 25'wide dense landscape buffer landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-9C will be required on the commercial property with development. • "A mixed-use project should include at least three types of land uses [i.e. commercial(includes retail,restaurants, etc.), office,residential, civic(includes public open space,parks,entertainment venues, etc.),and industrial]. Exceptions may be granted for smaller sites on a case-by-case basis." The proposed development will include a mix of residential, commercial retail, office, and industrial(storage units) uses as desired. • "Community-serving facilities such as hospitals,churches, schools,parks, daycares, civic buildings, or public safety facilities are expected in larger mixed-use developments." Medical offices (St. Luke's), a City Park(Hillsdale), the YMCA and an elementary school (Hillsdale) all exist within % mile to the east of this site. • "Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks,plazas, outdoor gathering areas,open space, libraries, and schools are expected; outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count." A City Park abuts the east boundary of this site and an elementary school, YMCA and small library is on the east side of the park.A site plan is not included for the retail/office portion of the development. The Applicant should design this area with buildings arranged to create some form of common, usable area, such as a plaza or green space in accord with this provision. • "All mixed-use projects should be directly accessible to neighborhoods within the section by both vehicles and pedestrians." The commercial portion of the development will be accessible to the residential neighborhood by vehicles via a local public street; a pedestrian connection is proposed at the north boundary of the residential area to the commercial area. • "Street sections consistent with the Ada County Highway District Master Street Map are required within the Unified Development Code." The Master Street Map does not depict any streets across this property. Page 7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 195 of 272 • "Because of the existing small lots within Old Town, development is not subject to the Mixed- Use standards listed herein." The proposed development is not within Old Town; therefore, this provision is not applicable. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in MU-N areas, per the Comprehensive Plan(pg. 25): (Staffs analysis in italics) • "Development should comply with the items listed for development in all Mixed Use areas." See previous section and associated analysis. • "Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 40%of the development area at densities ranging from six to 12 units/acre." With the 26 independent living units planned to the east of the single-family portion of the development, the overall gross density of the residential area is 4.4 units/acre(7.35 units/acre net), which is below the desired target range of the MU-N designation but within the range listed in the DA of 4 to 8 units/acre (net). • "Non-residential buildings should be proportional to and blend in with residential buildings." Concept elevations submitted for the storage facility while somewhat proportional in height, do not "blend"with the residential buildings in color,materials or design; concept elevations were not submitted for the commercial retaiUoffice or independent living portions of the development. To ensure consistency with this provision in the future,Staff recommends the Applicant make changes to the storage facility elevations to comply with this provision and submit concept elevations for the commercial buildings and independent living units that demonstrate a cohesive design that is proportional to and blends with the single-family residential buildings prior to the City Council hearing. In the alternative, design guidelines may be submitted for the overall development that demonstrate consistency with this provision. • "Unless a structure contains a mix of both residential and office, or residential and commercial land uses,maximum building size should be limited to a 20,000 square-foot building footprint. For the development of public school sites,the maximum building size does not apply." Residential uses are not proposed with the commercial retail and office uses. None of the structures within the storage facility exceed the 20,000 square foot(sf.) building footprint. Future commercial retail/office buildings(without residential uses)should not exceed 20,000 sf. • "Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places such as parks,plazas, outdoor gathering areas, open space, libraries, and schools should comprise a minimum of 10%of the development area. Outdoor seating at restaurants do not count towards this requirement." A City Park, YMCA, and elementary school exist to the east of this site and comprise over 10%of the MU-N designated area. • "Where the development proposes public and quasi-public uses to support the development above the minimum 10%,the developer may be eligible for additional residential densities and/or an increase to the maximum building footprint." Public and quasi public uses have already been developed or are in the development process directly to the east of this site exceeding the minimum 10%. No such increases to density or building footprint are requested. VI. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ANALYSIS U. A. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT MODIFICATION(MDA) A modification to the existing Amended Development Agreement(H-2018-0127,Instrument #2019-033207)is proposed consisting of an update to the conceptual development plan for the Page 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 196 of 272 site and text changes to some of the provisions in Section#5.1 of the agreement as noted in Section VIII.A of this report. The existing approved concept plan depicts a bubble plan for medium density residential, a proposed cell tower,commercial(C-N zoned), elementary school,YMCA, City Park, library, and health center complex uses on the site. The proposed plan still includes these uses but amends the northern portion of the residential area to also include self-service storage and retail/professional office uses; and amends the southern portion of the commercial (C-N zoned)area to also include independent living, and assisted living(see Section VIII.A). The northern portion of the site proposed for storage and commercial uses is proposed to be rezoned from R-8 to C-N and C-C and the portion proposed for independent living is proposed to be rezoned from C-N to R-15 to accommodate the proposed uses. Because the proposed uses are all listed as allowed uses in the applicable zoning districts per UDC Tables 11-2A-2 and 11-2B-2 and are uses that are desired within the MU-N FLUM designation, Staff is supportive of the proposed MDA. The proposed changes to the text of the agreement are noted in strike-out/underline format; Staff's comments in response to the proposed changes are noted in italic text. Staff is supportive of the proposed MDA request. B. REZONE(RZ) A rezone of a total of 39.9 acres of land from the R-8 zoning district to the C-N(4.9 acres), C-C (4.35 acres),and R-15 (30.65 acres)zoning districts is proposed, as depicted on the legal descriptions and associated exhibit maps in Section VIII.B. The proposed rezone and uses in these districts are consistent with the MU-N FLUM designation as discussed above in Section V; the C-C zoning district is requested for the storage facility as such uses are prohibited in the C-N district. The City may require a Development Agreement(DA) in conjunction with a rezone pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. In order to ensure future development as proposed with this application is consistent with the associated design elements of the Mixed Use FLUM designation, staff recommends new DA provisions are added to the proposed amended DA provisions included in Section VIII.A. C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CUP)-SELF-SERVICE STORAGE FACILITY A CUP is proposed for a 73,730 square foot(s.f.)443-unit self-service storage facility consisting of 8 structures ranging in size from 7,075 to 13,709 square feet on 3.89 acres of land in the C-C zoning district in accord with UDC Table 11-2B-2. Development of the facility should be consistent with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-213-3 for the C-C zoning district. A variety of storage unit sizes are proposed ranging from 5' x 5' to 14' x 35' as shown on the schematic site plan in Section VIII.D. One hundred thirty two (132)of the storage units are proposed to be climate controlled. Page 9 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 197 of 272 Specific Use Standards: The proposed use is subject to the following standards: (Staff comments in italics) UDC 11-4-3-34, Self-Service Storage Facility,as follows: A. Storage units and/or areas shall not be used as dwellings or as a commercial or industrial place of business. The manufacture or sale of any item by a tenant from or at a self-service storage facility is specifically prohibited. The Applicant shall comply. B. On site auctions of unclaimed items by the storage facility owners shall be allowed as a temporary use in accord with chapter 3, article E, "Temporary Use Requirements", of this title. The Applicant shall comply. C. The distance between structures shall be a minimum of twenty five feet(25'). The proposed site plan complies. D. The storage facility shall be completely fenced,walled, or enclosed and screened from public view. Where abutting a residential district or public road, chainlink shall not be allowed as fencing material. The perimeter buildings and a 6'tall fence (where no buildings are proposed)will screen the site from public view. E. If abutting a residential district,the facility hours of public operation shall be limited to six o'clock(6:00)A.M.to eleven o'clock(11:00)P.M. The site abuts planned residential uses along the south boundary; the Applicant shall comply. F.A minimum twenty five foot(25')wide landscape buffer shall be provided where the facility abuts a residential use,unless a greater buffer width is otherwise required by this title. Landscaping shall be provided as set forth in subsection 11-3B-9C of this title.A 25'wide landscape buffer is proposed along the southern boundary of the site adjacent to planned residential uses; the buffer should be planted with a mix of materials(i.e. evergreen and deciduous trees,shrubs, lawn or other vegetative groundcover)that results in a barrier that allows trees to touch at maturity—more trees/shrubs should be added to achieve the desired barrier. To prevent incidences of crime in this area that isn't visible from a public street, Staff recommends the area is fenced off from public access in accord with CPTED(Crime Prevention through Environmental Design)guidelines. G. If the use is unattended,the standards in accord with section 11-3A-16, "Self-Service Uses", of this title shall also apply. See standards below. H. The facility shall have a second means of access for emergency purposes.A secondary emergency only access is proposed at the west end of the site via E.Amity Rd. as depicted on the site plan. 1. All outdoor storage of material shall be maintained in an orderly manner so as not to create a public nuisance. Materials shall not be stored within the required yards. Stored items shall not block sidewalks or parking areas and may not impede vehicular or pedestrian traffic. The Applicant shall comply. J. The site shall not be used as a"vehicle wrecking or junk yard" as herein defined. The Applicant shall comply. K. For any use requiring the storage of fuel or hazardous material,the use shall be located a minimum of one thousand feet(1,000)from a hospital.No fuel or hazardous material will be stored on the site. Page 10 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 198 of 272 UDC 11-3A-16, Self-Service Uses, as follows: Any unattended, self-service uses, including,but not limited to,laundromats, automatic teller machines(ATMs),vehicle washing facilities,fuel sales facilities, and storage facilities, shall comply with the following requirements. The Meridian Police Chief or designee may approve alternative standards where it is determined that a similar or greater level of security is provided. A. Entrance or view of the self-service facility shall be open to the public street or to adjoining businesses and shall have low impact security lighting. B. Financial transaction areas shall be oriented to and visible from an area that receives a high volume of traffic, such as a collector or arterial street. C. Landscape shrubbery shall be limited to no more than three feet(Y) in height between entrances and financial transaction areas and the public street. Staff has reviewed these standards and found the proposed plan to be in general compliance with these standards with the recommended conditions. Access: Access to the facility is proposed via a driveway from E. Amity Rd. on the east side of the site;the entry to the facility faces future commercial uses to the east. An emergency only access is proposed via E.Amity Rd. as depicted on the site plan. Common Driveways(UDC 11-6C-3): All common driveways are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. Two(2)common driveways are proposed that comply with UDC standards. An exhibit is required to be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks,fencing,building envelope and orientation of the lots and structures.Driveways for abutting properties that aren't taking access from the common driveway(s) should be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line away from the common driveway. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited unless separated by a minimum 5-foot wide landscaped buffer. A perpetual ingress/egress easement for the common driveway(s)is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment.A copy of the easement should be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat. Signage should be provided at the ends of the common driveways on Lots 19 and 54,Block 1 for emergency wayfinding purposes as requested by the Fire Department. Parking: Off-street parking for the office associated with the storage facility is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-6. Based on 800 square feet for the proposed office, a minimum of one(1) space is required; a total of 4 spaces are proposed in excess of the minimum required. Landscaping: A 25' wide street buffer is required along E. Amity Rd. as set forth in UDC Table 11-2B-3,landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C; the proposed buffer complies with UDC standards. Landscaping is proposed in accord with UDC standards. A 25' buffer to residential uses is also required as discussed above. Sidewalk/Pathway: A detached sidewalk is required along E. Amity Rd., an arterial street,per UDC 11-3A-17C. The Park's Department requests a 10'wide detached multi-use pathway is provided instead of a 5'wide sidewalk. Page 11 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 199 of 272 Hours of Operation: Business hours of operation in the C-C district are limited from 6:00 am to 11:00 pm when the property abuts a residential use or district per UDC 11-2B-3B consistent with UDC 11-4-3-34E. Building size: As discussed above in Section V,the Comprehensive Plan states,building size should be limited to a 20,000 s.f.building footprint if the structure doesn't have a residential component with the office or commercial use;this applies to all future commercial retail/office on the site. The Applicant requested a deviation from this standard for the storage facility; however, none of the individual structures exceed 20,000 square feet,therefore, a deviation from this provision is not necessary. Building Elevations: Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the storage facility structures, included in Section VIII.1. Building materials consist of vertical reveal metal panels with stucco finish, fiber cement panels with metal channel reveals, and typical fascia with stone wall accents. Structures have step-backs for modulation along E. Amity Rd. As discussed above in Section V,the proposed elevations do not demonstrate a cohesive design that is proportion to and blends with the residential buildings within the development as desired in the MU-N FLUM designation. Therefore,the proposed concept elevations are not approved.Revised concept elevations(or design guidelines) should be submitted accordingly prior to the City Council hearing.Final design is required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. Certificate of Zoning Compliance/Design Review: A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application shall be submitted to the Planning Division and approved prior to submittal of building permit applications for the site. Prior to submittal of these applications the property is required to be subdivided. D. PRELIMINARY PLAT The proposed preliminary plat consists of a total of 147 buildable lots (137 residential and 10 commercial)and 18 common lots on 43 acres of land in the R-8,R-15, C-N and C-C zoning districts. A phasing plan is depicted on the plat that reflects four(4)phases of development(see Section VIII.E); however,the residential phase is anticipated to develop in one phase. The storage facility is proposed to develop first. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There is an existing home and accessory structures at the northeast corner of the site that are proposed to be removed with development;these structures should be removed prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat for the phase in which they are located.There is also an existing home and accessory structure that is proposed to remain on Lot 150,Block 1, which complies with the dimensional standards(i.e. setbacks)of the R-8 district listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): All development should comply with the dimensional standards for the applicable district as follows: UDC Tables 11-2A-6(R-8 district); 11-2A-7(R-15 district); and 11-2B-2 (C-N and C-C districts). Design: All subdivisions are required to comply with the subdivision design and improvement standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3C(i.e. streets,alleys,common driveways,block face, etc.). An Page 12 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 200 of 272 exception to UDC 11-6C-3A.1,which prohibits through properties is requested through the PUD (see analysis below). Access(UDC 11-3A-3): Access is proposed on the plat as follows: One(1)public street access(W. Rockhampton St.)via S. Eagle Rd.; one (1)public street access(S. Tavistock Ave.)via E.Amity Rd.; and one shared driveway access for the proposed storage facility and commercial retail/office development via E. Amity Rd. Staff believes the proposed access is consistent with the standards listed in UDC 11- 3A-3. Private streets are proposed for internal access within the North Phase of the development(see analysis below); two(2)common driveways are also proposed off private streets. Private Streets: Private streets are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4. Private streets are not intended for single-family developments other than those that create a common mew through the site design or that propose a limited gated residential development. Private streets are proposed within the North Phase of the development for access to proposed attached and detached units; two(2)gated entries and mews with alley accessed homes are proposed in the central portion of the development. The private street standards restrict development to no more than 50 dwelling units and don't allow common driveways off of a private street. The Applicant requests alternative compliance to UDC 11-3F-4A.4b to allow 124 units accessed off private gated streets; and to 11-3F-4A.6 to allow 2 common driveways off private streets. Requests for alternative compliance are only allowed when one or more of the conditions in UDC 11-5B-5B.2 exist. The Applicant's justification is, "The proposed design includes innovative design features based on"new urbanism,""neotraditional design,"or other architectural and/or site designs that promote walkable and mixed use neighborhoods."The Applicant believes the unique site design of gated,private streets, alleys, and common driveways; and common areas and pathways in combination with the character and diversity of the proposed dwellings achieves the aforementioned objective. Further,the Applicant believes approval of the alternative compliance request will provide a superior means of meeting the requirements of the UDC as is the intent for requests for Alternative Compliance.For these reasons,the Director has approved the Applicant's request for private streets and alternative compliance as it meets the requirements for such a request; see associated Findings in Section X.E and F. The Applicant or Owner shall have one year to complete the tasks listed in UDC I1-3F-3B for final approval of the private streets proposed within the development. No building permit shall be issued for any structure using a private street for access to a public street until the private street has been approved. The Applicant should coordinate with Terri Ricks and Fire Dept.for addressing lots accessed by alleys without frontage on a public street.Address signage for wayfinding purposes should be provided in these areas as well as at the private street for homes accessed by common driveways. Pathways(UDC 11-3A-8): The Park's Dept. requests a 10' wide multi-use pathway is provided within the street buffers in place of sidewalks along S.Eagle Rd. and E.Amity Rd.within a 14'wide public use easement.The pathway should be depicted on a revised plan submitted with the final plat application. Page 13 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 201 of 272 A pathway stub is proposed to the sidewalk along S. Eagle Rd. and to the commercial development to the north,which will extend along the east side of the service driveway adjacent to the commercial retail/office pads to the sidewalk along E. Amity Rd. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-1 : Sidewalks are required to be provided along all streets as set forth in UDC 11-3A-17. Five foot wide detached sidewalks with 8' wide parkways are proposed throughout the development in accord with UDC standards. As noted above, Staff recommends a 10' wide detached multi-use pathway is provided instead of a typical 5' wide sidewalk along S.Eagle Rd. and E.Amity Rd.,as requested by the Park's Dept. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-1 Parkways are required to be constructed and landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17E. Eight-foot wide parkways are proposed with Class II trees adjacent to all streets within the development in accord with UDC standards. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): A 25-foot wide street buffer is required along S. Eagle Rd. and E. Amity Rd.,both arterial streets, per UDC Tables 11-2A-7 and 11-2B-3, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C as proposed. If the unimproved right-of-way is 10' or greater from the edge of pavement to the edge of sidewalk or property line,the developer shall maintain a 10' compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of the transportation authority and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.5; this appears to apply along E.Amity Rd. Parkways are required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17 and II-3B-7C as proposed. Open space areas are required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11- 3G-3E as proposed. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited unless separated by a minimum 5'wide landscaped buffer per UDC 11-6C-3D.5.If applicable,depict landscaping in accord with this standard on a revised landscape plan. Qualified Open Space(UDC 11-3 : A minimum of 10%qualified open space is required to be provided for the residential development as set forth in UDC 11-3G-3B. Based on a total of 33.64 acres for the residential area, a minimum of 3.36 acres is required to be provided; a total of 5.5 acres(or 16.4%) is proposed,which exceeds the minimum standards. This calculation does not include 8' wide parkways along internal streets which also qualify toward the qualified open space standards. Qualified Site Amenities(UDC 11-3 Based on 33.64 acres for the residential area, a minimum of two(2)qualified site amenities required; a clubhouse, swimming pool, segments of the multi-use pathway system, and outdoor activity complex(specific amenities in this area are to be determined at CZC)are proposed in excess of the minimum standards. Waterways(UDC 11-3A-6): There are no significant waterways that cross this site other than possibly user ditches.All irrigation ditches crossing the site are required to be piped with development. Page 14 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 202 of 272 Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6,11-3A- • All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC I I-3A-7. Six-foot tall solid stained cedar fencing is proposed(or exists) along the perimeter boundary of the subdivision. Open vision wrought iron fencing and some closed vision fencing is proposed adjacent to internal common areas; fences abutting pathways and common open space that aren't entirely visible from a public street such as on the east side of Lot 107,Block 1, shall be revised to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7A.7.A detail of the open vision wrought iron fence that complies with the standards listed in should be included on a revised landscape plan. Utilities(UDC 11-3A-21): Utilities shall be installed with development in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A- 21. Building Elevations: Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the single-story, single- family attached and detached dwellings in"Cadence",the age restricted 55 and older portion of the development,included in Section VIII.1. Building materials consist of a variety of materials including vertical,horizontal and shake siding and stucco with stoneibrick accents. Conceptual elevations were not submitted for the estate lots in the R-8 district along the southern boundary of the development. Final design of the attached structures is required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. A Design Review application is required to be submitted to the Planning Division and approved prior to submittal of building permit applications for the single-family attached units; all attached structures are required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted for the clubhouse and swimming pool area and approved prior to submittal of a building permit application. The design of the structure is required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. The Applicant requests approval for this area to be constructed prior to subdivision of the property; Staff is amenable to this request. E. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PUD) A Planned Unit Development is proposed to enable the provision of a mix of attached and detached age-qualified 55+dwelling units that incorporate a variety of housing types and setbacks unique to unit and site design. The development is proposed to be gated for security purposes and have private streets, alleys and a common driveway for access to the units within the development. Setbacks: Deviations to the typical R-15 building setback requirements are proposed as noted below; and to UDC 11-6C-3B.5,which requires alleys to be designed so that the entire length is visible from a public street. Although not visible from a public street as public streets aren't proposed within the PUD area,the entire length of the alleys are visible from internal private streets. H0mE r L0T TYVF& FROM Y FLc SID& *Mrr SINi NFAKi TRADMO,uL-dI i EY Pxax SIDE $'0' C-0' J.4r C-0' r-F FxriO.FiRWT reuzAdE is-o' W-' N47 a43' 1741' STpNRWO-FRONT uOE W-4' W-W Y-W 75'-0' IT4Y c ATTAGHEQ HQf.%--4 MTBV xa 4ME_T*EE MASLf£.0 FR M e00--2F ME WAK Page 15 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 203 of 272 No deviations to the setbacks are requested or approved to the setbacks along the periphery of the planned development in accord with UDC 11-7-4A.1. Through Properties: The UDC(11-6C-3A.1)prohibits through properties except where it is shown that unusual topography or other conditions make it impossible to meet this requirement; through properties shall be limited to one street access on one frontage, designated by a note on the final plat. Lot 150,Block 1,where the existing home is proposed to remain,is a considered a"through"lot as it has frontage on two streets (E.Hill Park Ln.&W. Rockhampton Ct.).As part of the PUD request,the Applicant requests Council approval of an exception to this standard due to the unusual 2.57 acre size of the proposed lot,the northerly orientation and location of the residential structure, and its separation from the detached shop structure 150' to the south to allow access to be provided from both streets (E.Hill Park Ln.for the home and W.Rockhampton Ct.for the shop). Parking(UDC 11-3C-6) Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11- 3C-6 for residential uses,which requires parking pads to be provided in addition to garage parking spaces based on the number of bedrooms per unit(i.e. 1-2 bedroom units require 2 spaces per unit with at least one of those being in an enclosed garage,the other space may be enclosed or a minimum 10' x 20' parking pad; 3-4 bedroom units require 4 spaces per unit with at least two of those being in an enclosed garage,the other spaces may be enclosed or a minimum 10' x 20' parking pad). The standard—front garage and patio—front garage units allow for 20' parking pads but the traditional—alley garage and traditional—alley park side lots do not. alter-native wee-tn-the Off StFeet PRF!dHgstundards listed in 7�able 11 3C 6 single family dwellings shall be submitted and approved by the DiFeetor-PAOF tO the City Couneil .Two-car garages are proposed for these 2-bedroom units,which comply the aforementioned parking standards;therefore,alternative compliance is not required. Because 29' wide private streets are proposed within the development, parking is only allowed on one side of the street and should be provided on the street side adjacent to the alley accessed units rather than the patio homes with front accessed garages to allow for more spaces that aren't encumbered by driveways.An extra 30 parking spaces are proposed in the central portion of the development next to the community center which can accommodate guest parking in addition to on-street parking. Analysis of Compliance with PUD Standards (UDC 11-7- The proposed uses within the PUD area are interconnected through a system of private streets and pathways through common areas. Buildings are clustered to enable larger, more usable areas for common use and enjoyment. A minimum of 80 square feet ofprivate, usable open space is required to be provided for each unit; this requirement can be satisfied through porches,patios, decks and enclosed yards as set forth in UDC 11-7-4B. A variety of housing types are proposed consisting of conventional single-family detached homes on estate lots, single-family attached patio homes, traditional detached alley-loaded homes and traditional detached alley park side homes. The residential gross density of the north phase (i.e. age restricted portion) of the development is 4.66 units/acre with a net density of 9.03 units/acre, which is consistent with the Development Agreement provisions for desired density. Page 16 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 204 of 272 VII. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed DA modification,RZ, PP, CUP and PUD applications; the Director approved the request for ALT and tentatively approved the PS request. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on March 5 and 19, 2020. At the public hearing on March 19t1i,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject CUP,MDA,PUD,PP and RZ requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Mike Wardle,David Turnbull b. In opposition: None c. Commenting:None d. Written testimony: David Palumbo;Mike Wardle, Brighton Corporation in agreement with staff report) e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Ke, issue(s)of public testimony_ a. Would like to see the improvements (i.e. 4-lane roadway expansion)to E. Amity Rd. completed prior to any developments in this area commencijM b. Concern pertaining to the adequacy of parking proposed for the development; 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. Desire for the storage unit structures to have nice design elements(not just metal,)due to its location on a prominent corner; b. Question as to whether or not proposed dwelling units will be owner-occupied or rental units(answer is there is a section of independent living units next to the assisted living &memory care units that will be rental units for folks transitioning from a Cadence type product or somewhere in between—services will be shared between the assisted living&the independent living); c. In favor of this type of use in close proximity to the YMCA and the City park; d. Supportive of age-qualified use in this location due to area schools being over capacity; e. Suggestion that the Applicant consider an"L"shape for the storage fg acility that would allow more commercial retail/office uses in front adjacent to Amity Rd. and possibly extend the storage fly further to the east on the back side. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstandin issue(s)for City Council: a. The Applicant submitted revised site and landscape plans included in Section VIII, and a response to the Commission's recommendation and requested changes here:Applicant's Response—Staff's related comments are here: Staffs comments b. The Applicant requests Council approval of a modification to DA provision#5.1e, which requires the existing(Mg , Hill's)home to hook up to City water and sewer service within 60 days of services becoming available from the adjacent R-8 zoned propeM per MCC 9-14A to instead require the home to be hooked up to City services within 60 days of the final platting of the estate lots. b. In response to Staff s recommendation in DA provision#5.1 g.vi in Section VIII, the Applicant submitted design guidelines for the commercial and residential buildings within the development governed by the DA as follows:Design Guidelines Page 17 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 205 of 272 C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on April 21.2020.At the public hearing.the Council moved to approve the subject CUP. MDA, PUD. PP and RZ requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Mike Wardle,Jon Wardle, Lars Hansen. and David Turnbull.Brighton Corporation b. In opposition:None c. Commenting d. Written testimony: Mike Wardle,Brighton Corp. e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: Joe Bongiomo, Fire Dept. 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. The Applicant's request for removal of the requirement to provide of a 10' wide multi- use pathway within the street buffers along Amity and Eagle Roads: b. The provision of common usable area as proposed by the Applicant in the commercial portion of the development in relation to DA provision#5.1gii. C. Consistency of the proposed design guidelines and concept elevations for the residential and commercial uses with the provision in the MU-N designation in the Comprehensive Plan for non-residential buildings t�proportional to and blend in with residential buildings. d. The Applicant's request for allowance of a building permit to be issued for the community center prior to subdivision of the property. e. The Applicant's request for Marty Hill's home to hook up to City sewer and water within 60 days of the final platting of the estate lots. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. Delete conditions#lc.#2b.#3c.#10a and#12 requiring a 10' wide pathway and associated easement along Amity and Eagle Roads- b. Add language to conditions#A.13 and#B.2.9 that would allow a building permit to be issued for the community center prior to the private streets receiving final approval and the subdivision being recorded- C. Modify DA provision#5.1e to allow the existing home(Marty Hill's)to hook N to City water and sewer service within 60 days of the final platting of the estate lots: d. The storage unit designquiM to be consistent with other commercial structures and is subject to the design guidelines for the development contained in the DA(see condition#A.71 e. A through driveway from E. Hill Park Ln.to W. Rockhampton Ct. shall be provided on the Hill property(Lot 150,Block 1) for emergency access purposes (see condition #A.l d)d). VIII. EXHIBITS A. Existing&Proposed Conceptual Development Plans and Text Changes to Development Agreement Inst.#2019-033207 for Proposed Development Agreement Modification Existing Concept Plan: Page 18 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 206 of 272 Pwrem REVISED Updated Plan(daled: L'�',�� 12fIW2018)j RLtjW b) (-it) Hill Properties DA Modification lM�M�f • CENTURY FARM COM ERCIAL SUDOMMSIONI � t:Y�rt,a e•�. I allrolula orwsaTv R[i+arwllaE 1 F Y a •1. • 1 I BUFALTHY LIVING I SUBDIVISION" � � MrESTApA fLfMEHriLR1 iCN4C.• Y4ICA4 arY PARK.LIERARI HEAL TN CENTER COMPIE,Y L------_----------- --"----------� I!I[l'S[F1+t1UR1FARMSUBC�NISIClk ,,,,,,,�,-,,.,,,,,r",�,,,,,^•,,�. Proposed Concept/Bubble Plan: AMITY RDA IF HILLS C pTtlRYiFJ4RRt '� "• RET ILfPROFESSION L ' ELF-SERVICE STORAGE COMMERCI LSUEIq ISlON t OFF E ! �� � INDEPENDENT WI Lj A ' VERANDA �I ASSISTED CADEE q WING _ AGE OW IF -/9 y n a by r - _ ESTATE -� m —Lo76 D 3 _ - 1. City Park ti I u MC ' y M NIVENFAO,IAL LOTS — Elefa s S. r � IHILL'S M IS1 N H Lu i[l,2�1�N�y COMCEPT�JENOARTH D Proposed Changes to the Text [pgs. 1-3 of Second Amendment to Development Agreement Inst. #2019-033207(H-2018-0127): (Staffs comments in italics—not to be included in final DA) Page 19 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020- Page 207 of 272 1. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall be bound by the terms of the original Development Agreement, except as specifically amended as follows: 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1. Owner/Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. lwipr-eve S.Hillsdale Avenue as a p4lie st+eet adjacent to the east boundary of this site as requir by Ada County Highway Dist iet.No longer applicable (street has been constructed). b. Business hours of operation in the C-N district shall be limited from 6:00 am to 10:00 pm as set forth in UDC11-2B-3A.4,except for the YMCA which is allowed to operate from 5:00 am to 10:00 pm. The residential care facility use does not violate the limitation on the hours of operation. c. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the amended concept plans dated '-`ember ,Q 'n'Q October 30,2019 included in the Staff Report attached to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law from the modification to Development Agreement(14 '^iz- 01 9 012:7H-2019- 0134) attached hereto as Exhibit"A". (Updated per MDA request) d. Future development of this site should include a pedestrian pathway network that links the mixed use area with the residential and the elementary school/YMCA site as well as adjacent off-site properties. Vehicular connections should also be provided for interconnectivity within the site. e. The existing home in the R-8 zoning district that is proposed to remain at the south boundary of the annexation area midway between S. Eagle Road and S. 14ovqy Lane Hillsdale Ave. shall be required to hook up to City water and sewer service within 60 days of seFviees bo,.,... ing av rabble f.,,m the development of the .,djaeefft n 8 zoned p po the final platting of the estate lots, per MCC 9-1-4A;the existing home that fronts on E.Amity Road that is proposed to be removed with redevelopment of the site and the existing home that fronts on S. Hillsdale Ave. that is proposed to remain in the C-N district as long as the Hill's reside there are not required to hook up to City services. (Street name changed) f. The rear or sides of homes on lots that face S. Eagle Road and E. Amity Re shall incorporate articulation through changes in materials,color,modulation,and architectural elements(horizontal and vertical)to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines. (No longer applicable—no homes are proposed along Amity Rd.) g. To ensure future development is consistent with the objectives and vision of the MU-N designation the following items will be considered in reviewing development applications: i. Community serving facilities (i.e. a school,park,YMCA, library,hospitals, churches, daycares,civic buildings, or public safety facilities) should be provided; ii. Publie and quasi publie spaees(i.e.pla-zas,par-ks, outdoor-gathering ar-eas,open , ° ;No longer applicable—these areas have been provided with development of the City Park, YMCA and library and elementary school at approximately 20% of the overall development area. Ili. Street sections consistent with the Ada County Highway District Master Street Map are required; iv. Neighborhood serving uses and dwellings should be integrated; V. Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 40%of the development area with net densities ranging from 4 to 8 units per acre with supporting non-residential services. Page 20 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 208 of 272 Non-residential uses should be smaller scale and provide a good or service that people typically don't travel more than a mile for and need regularly; vi. Non-residential buildings should be proportional to and blend in with residential buildings consistent with the design guidelines and conceptual elevations presented by the Applicant and approved by City Council included in Exhibit J, To ensure eonsistmey WM this ptw+ision hi the future, Sta inde pendent Uving miks that demonstrate a eohesive design that is pmporwo"al to and blends with the singk family residential buddiifp 194or so the City Counei A4 for the over-ag deveMpittens that demonstmte eonsisteney with this provision. vii. Employment opportunities for those living in the neighborhood are encouraged; viii. The mixed use project should be directly accessible to neighborhoods within the section by both vehicles and pedestrians; ix. Planning of the C-N property north of the park and YMCA shall consider appropriate visibility,parking and emergency access to the future neighborhood park. X. Sample uses appropriate in the MU-N area would include: townhouses, multi-family developments, neighborhood grocer, drug stores, coffee/sandwich/ice-cream shops, vertically integrated buildings, live-work spaces, dry cleaner/laundromat, salons/spas, daycares, neighborhood-scale professional offices, medical/dental clinics, gift shops, schools,parks,churches, clubhouses,public uses,and other appropriate neighborhood uses. eemer-of the site as buffer-ifig will be aehieved thr-otigh the adjaeent City park,YN4GA and sehool cemplex and the pr-epet4y willeventually of YMCA site. The City Park is in the development process and the YMCA and school is already constructed, no buffer was required to the Hill property and this provision is no longer applicable. i. The annexation area shall be subdivided prior to issuance of any building permits beyond those required for the development of the school, YMCA and park site, and a wireless communication facility, the assisted livingfacility,acility, medical clinic, and the Hill's Century Farm North community center complex on common Lot 101 as shown on the revised conceptual development plan dated October 22 30,241&2019;an4-the assisted living f eil4y a-a ,,.edie.ai ,.i Rie shE) - AM the, eta le 1 site plan approved with H 2016 0092� Note: See Staffs recommended new DA provisions included in Section IX.A.1 that should be added to the existing/proposed DA provisions in this section as a provision of the subject Rezone request. Page 21 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 209 of 272 B. Legal Descriptions & Exhibit Maps for Rezone Overall Zoning Exhibit: r � AMITY ROA C-C -C_N • mod, � � - � .__ � .. , R_=S R-15 l Hillsdale Ysr _ City Park ��,'� ���1�'VMC - - u ilfsdal3 Elem HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH ZONING � j a EXISTING/ PROPOSED -- rn Page 22 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 210 of 272 km 9233 WEST STATE STREET I BOISE,ID 83714 209.639.6939 FAX 208.639.6930 June�,3,2t}l� Project No.:18.137 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DMRIP71ON FOR REZONE TO C-N A parcel of land being a poitlon of the North 2/2 of the northwest 114 of Section 33,Township 3 North,Range 1 East,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap marking the Northwest corner of said Section 33,which bears N8915'22"VVa distance of2,660.61feotfrom a found brass cap marking the North 1/4 corner of said Section 3�; Thence following the northerly line of the NW 1/4 of 5ecti❑n 93,589'15'22"E a distance of 892.60 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence followingsaid northerly line,589'15'22"E a distance of 609,12 feet to a paint; Thence leaving said northerly line,S00'16'11"W a distance of 350.17 feet to a point; Thence IN99"15'22"W a distance of612.02 feet to a point; Thence NOD'44'39"E a distance of 350316 feet tothe POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains4.909 acres,more or less,and Is subject to all existing easementsand{ordghts-of-way-of recofd urimpiied- Attached is EXHIBIT and by this reference made a part of. w 12459 Pd,p r' OF � q L. 'ap"o I 7101119 ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS wwwv.krnengllp.com Page 23 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 211 of 272 POLN I a COMMENCEMENT raw COR SECTION 33 E.AmItV Road POINT OF IRASI5 OF I3EARING3 BEGINNING 1469`15'22W 2660.93' NORTH I GDR SECTION 33 592.60' SLi9'15'22"f fi09.i2' -o ---R/NLd — A ° Total Rezone:4.90$± —b�.a � o APN: 51133223[31O ua $t 51 W212403 (POR.) � i " CURRI NT TONING: R—B g PROPOSED ZONING; C—N Ul Hill's Century Farm Ll, N69'I5'22V 612.02' Commercial Sub. No. 1 UNPLATTED UNPLATTEO R f4V- R/41- R�hV Healthy Living Subdivision � I! I N LEGEND _.._. 0 BRASS CAP ALUMINUM CAP CALCULATED POINT REZONE BOUNDARY — —SECTION LJNE 0 150 300 500 -EVW—RIGHT--OF—WAY LINE 1"=300' ENMNFERS.SURVEYORS.PLANNERT 923}WEST STATESTAEEf BUI55,i WhF-0D 53714 PHOHEjtpOI 638-843'9 FAX(20M 639-69P EXH I BIT B - REZONE TO C-N CENTURY FARM NORTH DATE fr13.1U19 PROJEL"r, 18-137 PUKE- : A PORTION OF THE N 1/2 NW 1/4 SHEE 1 OF 1 SECTION 33,T. 3 N., Ft. 1 E., B.M.,ADA COUNTY, ID Page 24 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 212 of 272 '1 9233 WEST STATE STREET I BOISE,0 83714 1 Z08.639$M 1 FAX MSS 639.6530 June 13,2019 Project Na:18-137 EXHIBIT A tl GAL DESCRIPTION FOR REZONE TO C-C A parcel of land being a portion of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 33,Township 3 North, Range 1 East,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as hollows; Commencing at found aluminum cap marking the Northwest corner of said Section 33,which bears h184°15'22"W a distance of 2,660.61 feet from a found brass cap marking the North 1/4 cornerof said Sertlon 33; Thence following the northerly line of the NW 1/4 of Section 33,S89'15'22`E a distance of 350.16 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence following said northerly line,SS9'15'22"E a distance of 542.44 feettn a point, Thence leaving said northerly line,SOWV38"W a distance of 350.16 foot to a point; Thence N89"15'22"W a distancevf 539,24feet to a point; Thence N40°13'13"E a distance of 350.17 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 4.348 acres,more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights-of-way of record or Implied. Attached is EKHIBtT B and by this reference made a part of. 1245f) OF ENC,I SEERS j SURVIVORS PLANNERS www.kmengllp.cam Page 25 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 213 of 272 l POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NW COR SECTION 33 E.Amity Road BASS OF 9EARINGS `J:,K TH 'f 4 C[H N89'15'22"W 2650,61" 350.16' S89'15'22'E 542A4' _ �R/W �i/41' — RfH' R/41�R�yH .... iV 00,13,13,E Total Rezone:4,34$± 500'44'36"W 360.17' APH: 3113M23410 (POR.) 350-1V CURRENT ZONING: R-•8 PROP05ED ZONNIM C-C 4 dJ N89182 YP 539.24' w UNPLATTEU CIO i UNPLATTE❑ f Healthy Living j Subdivision LEGEND BRASS CAP ALUIVINlJhi CAP CALCULATED PRINT REZONE BOUNDARY -- — —SECTION LINE 0 150 300 50L Rlti~' RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE F 1"=300' ENGINEERS.SwFtiuOkS.PLANNERS 9733 w8r 1TATf MEE! BOISE,IPAHB 83714 PHONE 120BI 639-W39 FAIL;2G6y ra4£93tl EXHBIT B - REZONE TO C-C CENTURY FARM NORTH DATE: SHEET: A PORTION OFTHE NW 1/4 NW 1/4 1 OF 1 SECTION 33, T. 3 N., R. 1 E., 5,M., ADA COUNTY, ID Page 26 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020- Page 214 of 272 km WoMMEM 9233 WESTSTATE STREET I BOISE, ID 83714 1 208.639.6939 1 FAX 208.639.5930 December 24,2019 Project No,-184137 EXH113IT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR REZONE TO R-15 A parcel of land being a portion of the North 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 33,Township 3 North, Range 1 East,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being mare particularly described as follows: Commencing at found aluminumn cap markingthe Northwest corner of said Section 33,which bears NOO"13'13"E a distance of 2,677.50 feet from a found aluminum cap marking the West 1/4 corner of said Section 33; Thence following the westerly line of the Northwest 114 of Section 33,SOb`13'13"W a distance of 350.17 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence leaving said westerly fine,S99'15'22"E a distance of 1,874.00feetto the subdivision boundaryof Hill's Century Farm Commercial Subdivision No.1(Book 115 of Plats at Pages 17,131through 17,134,retards of Ada County,Idaho); 'thence following said subdivision boundary the following six(6)courses: 1. S00'4438"W a distance of 27.68 feet 2, 589`46'03"E a distance of 134.85 feet; 3, S00°44'38"W a distance of 297.56 feet; 4. S57°16'19"W a distance of 13,%feet, 5. N89°46'03"W a distance of 16.60 feet; 6, S0013'57"W a distance of 31.50 feet; Thence leaving said subdivision boundary,N89°46'03"W a distance of 175.29 feet; Thence 231.25 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 500.00 feet,a delta angle of 26'29'58",a chord bearing of N76'31'04"W and a chord distance of 229.20 feet; Thence N63°16'OS"W a distance of 105.11 feet; Thence 194.36 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 170.50 feet a delta angle of 61'57'08",a chord bearing of S59"33'30"W and a chord distance of 175.51 feet; Thence N89°27'52"W a distance of 52.53 feet; Thence S0012'08"W a distance of 397.94 feet; Thence 560'37'07"1N a distance of 157.72 feet; Thence N89°27'52"W a distance of 583.30 feet; Thence 72.41 feetalong the arcof a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 190.00 feet,a delta angle of 23°02'55",a chord bearing of N77°5624"IN and a chord distance of 7132 feet; Thence N66"24'57"W a distance of 40.65 feet; Thence 215.16 feet along the arcof a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 200.54 feet,a delta angle of 61°29'O8",a chord bearing of 559°4734"W and a chord distance of 204.99 feet; Thence N89'27'52"W a distance of 273.35 feet to a point on the said westerly fine of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 33; Thence fallowing said westerly line,NOC°13'13"E a distance of 913.07 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS I PLANNERS www.kmenglip.com Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 215 of 272 Said parcel contains 30.65 acres,more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights-of-way of record or implied. Attached is EXHIBIT Band by this reference made apart of. �145 ' °v L. 8 Page 28 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 216 of 272 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT AW COR SECTON 33 E. Amity Raab NORTHEcn4 COR — — N5W15'22"44 2680.61' _ r! R RJw- -R/w�RfW RfW R/W RA LL O SD4'13'13"W ` 350.17' U nplatted44 a Aft S1 1 3322301 0 (POR.) 1Jflp B Ed AM S1133212403 (POR.) v: � 7 Ln S6W15'22"E 1574,00' L2= POINT OF L1 L BEGINNING � E N63'15'05'W " O i. N89'27'52 W 105.11' L4 L5 _ Total Rezone: 30.65 AC t 52.53' Cl LS vim APN. 51133223D1U (POR.) _ w APN: 51 1332 1 2403 (POR) 1V89'46'D3 1 CM CURRENT ZONING: R—B 175. 8' m M PROPOSED ZONING: R-15 8 P, ii LW�1•Y y C G N66 24'57"W 2 z 40.65' J Ln Ln C N89'27'52'W +s—, N89'27'S2"YI Unpiatked 57.725732' 583.3D' 1 '07 tiY )L*J 273.35' APN: S1133223010 (POR.) Hill's Century Farm Hill's Century Farm Subdivision Phase 1 Subdivision Phase 2 CURVETABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA CHORD 9RG CHORD LINE TABLE C1 500.00' 231.25' 2529'58" N7V31'D4"W 229.20' LINE# LENGTH DIRECTION C2 170.50' 104.36' 61'57'08" S59'33'30'W 175.51' L1 27.68 50'44'38-W C3 180.00' 72.41' 23'02'55" N77 56'24W 71.92' L2 _ 134,a5 S59'46103"E C4 200.50' I 215.16' 61'29'08- S59'47'34-Vi 2D4.99' 0 2.97.56 S0'44'36"W WEST 1/4 COR SECnoN 33 LE a L4 13.96 ssr 16'19"VP L5 16.60 N89'46'03"W 0 BRASS CAP L6 31.50 SO'13'57"W ALUMINUM CAP CALCULATED POINT kin REZONE BOUNDARY — — — — —SECTION LINE 0 150 304 60C, EN GI NEERS,SURVMRS.PLANNERS R/4! RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE 9233 WEST STATES; ET PARCEL LAVE 1"R£ -3oo, 90M.ID,W0 93714 P g FAX{zw;6 96930 EXHIBIT B - REZONE TO R-15 CE14TLJRY FARM NORTH DATE: IM4-2019 PROJECT: 28-237 SHEET: A PORTION OF THE IN 1/2 NW 1/4 1 OF 1 5ECTJON 33,T. 3 N., R. 1 E., R.M.,ADA COUNTY, ID Page 29 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 217 of 272 C. Overall Site Plan (date: 10/30/2019) ��>✓� .L,,✓ _ _ ..I �� I� .:II... � .o — AMITY RQA - � �� HILL'S C^� RETAIL/PRO... _ • SELF-SERVICE STORAGE FESS � 1oN L i� COMMERCIAL SU IVISI N r' i DFFI�E �y}yI • �'�`-'Ijy'INDEPENDENT LIVING .1 { ww )PVF _- .A VERANDA ASSISTED M 1 r LIVING - CADENCE ' 3 7 AGE Q{,I dIFIED D '+ ' r , L ESTATE ,l LOTS Hillsdale City Park,1 ' I C 4 �S c � CONVENTIUPJALLflTS fi r -` Illsdal U -- Ele 2 ` ILL'S ZU�1C fM.__. ISIDN .-CIL "� ; ) D HILL'S CENTuRY FARM NORTH r �'f m October 36,2019 CONCEPTUAL—SUBJECT TO CHANGE >� '"� Page 30 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 218 of 272 A Site Plan& Landscape Plan for Storage Facility(dated: October 8 and 18, 2019 respectively) ❑...,. -�� .»�.® E.AMITY ROAD ————— ❑-- li 7 CENTURY FARM SELF STORAGE 16 SCNEMAIIC SIZE PLAN I_ �.5y-------- ` !r — --- III !__-A'----- � 'T• 6�-»-� roa �. i 2 —. . w — F CONDITIONAL USE PERMITSITE PLAN o 0 km■ ci o Page 31 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 219 of 272 , I 1 o --------------- ------ ----- ------------- ---- ---- axs(I—E/sLF) --- _ -------- ------- � w --------- -- „w ll �9eo WI-I OF PARKING 1-P-MI-11—CAPE-KIP CANDITIDNA.L.USE PERMIT LANDSCAPE PLAN a-wz-'; — A�.�a...a� o; uo Page 32 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 220 of 272 E. Preliminary Plat(date: 11/18/2019) HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH PRELIMINARY PLAT II "" A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NW 114 OF SECTION 33,TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,RANGE 1 �E.Ai"mw 5 I` EAST,BOISE MERIDIAN,CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADACOUNTY,IDAHOmm MAP— _ d o 0 0 0 as" 0 0 0 0 �"ERP © o o o ® © ®moo37- 0 xo- 0 0 � O O O O O O O O o 0 0 OD O O O 0 0 0 I me vsI"d mvHAsq 0 0 o © o ® ®®®eeg WMM0-AHHSIRESIR-S0VIHPHMLE I ® ®Yq. Q C" O O Onmw"caxs_R.Y ARM NORTH _ " nuum near HILL'SCENTURYF G �I 61 if I I I I 1 � I \ h _— IL ili 11 � I I I I I TI a I � 3 � �: , � nmw"rorm"urnox HILL'S CENT�1URYpPyFA�RRM NORTH D E""MMERiDIatI.IMON' 16 ion Page 33 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 221 of 272 � „`off •wo � .., ... ., «, «° wa m .Y $ r©©: �$ �➢ .°a � ®Y ©° e_oj.®$®€o@ o? o° of ®$ o; ©�_©'s aE o3®, © © ,o �' 3 0 8~ •o $ .$ a �o wa � - ®s p ' $ 9 $ y® ? VRE�MINARV FIAT NOTES ®$ a ai aa. a. ae •� ...em."�n si��' �H ILL SpCENTURYFARMNORTH w.yia - ©° w, B o $tl®, 3 ®. km © o Ro r �aPP2016 Page 34 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 222 of 272 F. Landscape Plan for Subdivision (date: 10/242019 4/2/2020 REVISED) C-_ 0 0 Y ------ ........... El ............. ..................... ............. . ................. ....... . ... ...... o . .... .... .......... . ... .... .... ------ STPEEYTREEGALCULATIONS(ITREEMSLFI w ;= mw ................................................. ...... .... LANDSCAPE COVER SHEET mceww.Eo HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH w PPL1_0 Page 35 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 223 of 272 ----- - ----- ---------------------- - -— _ =-=-- L1 O O O p O © O ® O O ® O ® O © O © ® O x''• O O i O ® o e e e ® ® e ey e o L T — 0 HILL'SCENTURYFARMNORTH LAND.SCJIPE PLAN �PPU.0„ O O O i O — R i O O O p j ---- � - -- --- - -- ----------------- ----,L,,--— - --------------- ------- - x - LANDSCAPE PLAN ; HILL'SCENTHRY FARM NORM ...i�p'[[iouous 3 � 4 � - e Page 36 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020- Page 224 of 272 G. Qualified Open Space Exhibit(date: 3/17/2020) HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT CJ -g� q�$ o maEsmma vw o 0 0 o o ® o LEGEND ����o o o o -0000000000000 � o E�ca� ,�, N o 0 0 =(R-DES �E) I� oo ® o o .ma...E IF R xeuv SPACE �1HILL'SCENTU RYNFARMNORTH OPEN IXHI81T o.w,�vas ovEI svncE Ex1H11 T Eia.o Page 37 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 225 of 272 H. Residential Setbacks for Cadence at Century Farm I � w 0 W.L.SLI+.YMPLE LN. - r— III vi 1r, I ' \1\ / J E O .HILL PARK LN N 0 z a r � 01 13 O J WQ:z f EXISTING RESIDENCE W,ROCKHAMPTON ST. AND OUTBUILDING f 0 HOME 1 LOT TYPES: FRONT: GARAGE: SIDE: STREET SIDE: REAR: I TRADITIONAL-ALLEY GARAGE ea 6.-0• a'-T c-0• 94r CADENCE TRADITIONAL-ALLEY PARK 510E 6'-W G-0' 4'-0" 6'-0' 6W AT J PATID-FRONTGARAGE 10w- sow• A'., 0101 iz-.v CENTURY FARM STANDARD-FROM GARAGE 151-T 10'-0' 6-7 1E-0' 151-0" n %TTACHEIIHOMES SE�6FGK8/�E TO eg MgxSu>iEP caP.�B+c�[F 69E wa r, Page 38 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 226 of 272 1. Building Elevations (date: 10/14/2019) r 1'-_._----- ___. si i.w' 1�us is !! a I j- # ATM • s 1 CENTURY FARM SELF STORAGE SCH EMAIIC E%I—R EEV ONS •+nab umux sa rs s �xwm«'M.urui�i mi�iiiulw em w.mo�„xrnr.nrsfe so..�.>>amx xaav re sl de=��bi=om ED i - - TYPICAL PATIO HOME ELEVATION Ell TYPICALALLEY HOME ELEVATION J. Conceptual Building Elevations &Design Guidelines for Residential & Commercial Development Design Guidelines Page 39 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 227 of 272 IX. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION Rezone: 1. New development provisions shall be added to the proposed amended Development Agreement(DA)provisions in Section VIII.A of this report as a provision of the Rezone. Prior to approval of the Rezone ordinance, an amended DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s) at the time of rezone ordinance adoption, and the developer. The amended DA shall be signed by the property owner and developer and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the rezone. The amended DA shall incorporate the following provisions: a. The buildings in the retail/professional office area shown on the conceptual development plan shall be arranged to create some form of common,usable area, such as a plaza or green space as desired in Mixed Use designated areas as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan(see pg. 25). b. Building sizes in the commercial retail/office portion of the development shall be limited to a 20,000 square foot building footprint as desired in MU-N designated areas in accord with the Comprehensive Plan(see pg. 25).If a structure contains a mix of both residential and office, or residential and commercial land uses, the maximum building size may exceed 20,000 square feet. e. Provide 10' wide detaeked multi use pathways withia the stfeet buff-er-s along S. Eagle Rd. a-ad E.Amity Rd. in plaee of sidewalks as r-equested by the PaFk's Depaftmm. d. A through driveway shall be provided on the Hill property(Lot 150, Block 1) from E. Hill Park Ln.to W. Rockhampton Ct. for emergency access purposes. Conditional Use Permit(Storage Facility): 2. The site plan included in Section VIII.D, dated October 10, 2019, shall be revised as follows: a. The buffer area(and other areas as applicable)not visible from a public street or driveway behind the storage facility on the south side of the building shall be fenced off from public access to prevent incidences of crime in accord CPTED guidelines. b. Depiet a 10' wide detaehed multi use pathway within the stifeet buffer-along E.Ami Rd. as required by the Pafk's Depaftment. 3. The landscape plan included in Section VIII.D, dated October 10,2019, shall be revised as follows: a. Depict additional evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs within the 25' wide buffer along the southern boundary of the site to result in a barrier that allows trees to touch at maturity in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-9C. b. To prevent incidences of crime in buffer areas that aren't isn't visible from a public street, Staff recommends the area is fenced off from public access in accord CPTED guidelines. e. Depiet a 10' wide detaehed multi use pathwaywithin the stFeet buffer-along E. Ami Rd. as r-equir-ed by the P"'s Depai4ment. d. Extend the 5' wide pathway at the north boundary through the 25' wide buffer into the commercial site. Page 40 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 228 of 272 4. Compliance with the standards for self-service storage facilities listed in UDC 11-4-3-34 is required. 5. The entrance or view of the facility shall be open to adjoining businesses and low impact security lighting shall be provided in accord with UDC 11-3A-16A. 6. If abutting a residential district,the facility hours of public operation shall be limited to six o'clock(6:00)A.M. to eleven o'clock(11:00)P.M. 7. The design of the storage structures shall comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual and shall be consistent with other commercial structures on the site and the design guidelines for the development contained in the Development Agreement. 8. The property shall be subdivided prior to submittal of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) and Design Review(DES)application for any structure beyond the community center. A CZC and DES application shall be approved prior to submittal of building permit applications for the site. Preliminary Plat: 9. The preliminary plat included in Section VIII.E, dated November 18, 2019, is approved as submitted. 10. The landscape plan included in Section VIII.F,dated Oetober 24, 20 °Apri12,2020, shall be revised as follows PAOF tO the City Couneil hearing- a. Depiet a 10' wide detaehed multi use pathway wAin the stfeet buffer-s a!E)Hg S. Eagle Rd. a-ad F. Am4y Rd. in plaee of a sidewalk. t, if the unimproved gh4 f way is i n' , greater from the edge f pavement t the edge 9 sidewalk or-pr-epei4y line,the developef:shall fnain�aia a 10' eempaeted shoulder-meeting with'�ffi E)r-othef:vegetative greund sever-as-Jet feAh in UPC 11 3B 7 Depicted e. Solid feneing adjaeent to eofmnefi dfiveways is prohibited unless separated 1—- lands,..,ping; aeeE)f:d with this star a.Depicted d. Feneing an the east side f Lot 107, eek 'ill be revised to so,,ply it ., o standards listed i„T�I-3 A 7A. Complies e. inelude a detail for-th fenee that eomplies with the standaMs listed in UDG " 3A 7 Included 11. The existing home and accessory structures at the northeast corner of the site shall be removed prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat for the phase in which they are located. 12. Submit a 14' wide publie pedestfian easement for-the ffm4i use pat",ay along E.A-mity R and S. Eagle Rd.to the Planning Division prior-to s4mittal of the final pW for-City Engineer- signatufe as required by the Par4's Depaftment. 13. The Applicant or Owner shall have one year to complete the tasks listed in UDC 11-3F-3B for final approval of the private streets proposed within the development.No building permit shall be issued for any structure using a private street for access to a public street until the private street has been approved,with the exception that a building permit may be issued for the community center. Page 41 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 229 of 272 14. The Applicant shall coordinate with Terri Ricks,Land Development, and Joe Bongiorno,Fire Dept., for addressing lots accessed by alleys without frontage on a street. 15. An exhibit shall be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks, fencing, building envelope and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via common driveways. Driveways for abutting properties that aren't taking access from the common driveway(s) shall be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line away from the common driveway. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited unless separated by a minimum 5-foot wide landscaped buffer. 16. A perpetual ingress/egress easement for the common driveway(s)is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment.A copy of the easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat. 17. Address signage shall be provided at the ends of the common driveways on Lots 19 and 54, Block 1; and for lots accessed by alleys that don't have frontage on a private street for emergency wayfinding purposes. 18. A minimum of 5.5 acres of qualified open space shall be provided in accord with the qualified open space exhibit in Section VIII.G; and qualified site amenities shall be provided consisting of a clubhouse, swimming pool, segments of the multi-use pathway system, and outdoor activity complex(specific amenities in this area are to be determined at CZC). 19. All common driveways shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. 20. Parking is restricted to one side of the 29-foot wide streets and shall be provided on the street side adjacent to the alley accessed units rather than the patio homes with front accessed garages to allow for more spaces that aren't encumbered by driveways. Planned Unit Development(PUD): 21. Development of the R-15 zoned gated portion of the development(i.e. Cadence) shall be consistent with the Residential Setbacks exhibit in Section VIII.H and the conceptual building elevations included in Section VIII.I. 22. Access to the through property on Lot 150,Block 1 is allowed via two access points—one via E. Hill Park Ln. for the house and one via W. Rockhampton Ct. for the shop associated with the house,unless otherwise approved by City Council. 23. All alleys shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3B.5 with an allowance for the entire length to be visible from a private street rather than a public street. 24. A minimum of 80 square feet of private,usable open space shall be provided for each dwelling unit;this requirement can be satisfied through porches,patios, decks and enclosed yards as set forth in UDC 11-7-4B. 25. An applieation for-Alter-native Complianee to the off street par-king standards listed in UDC Table 11 X 6 for-single family dwellings shall be submitted to the P! Division and approved by the Dir-eetor-prior-to the City Couneil hearing. This application was determined to not be required as the proposed plan complies with the parking standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6. Page 42 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 230 of 272 B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 No civil utility plans were submitted for the sanitary sewer with this application,therefore no specific review or modeling has been completed. 1.2 A portion of the proposed 8"water main will need to be upsized to 12". The reason for the 12" size is for future abandonment of the existing 12" in Eagle Road due to avoiding utilities crossing the roundabout at the Amity intersection. Specifically from Eagle Road through the common area to Palatino,then down Dalrymple to the common area and then north to Amity Road. 1.3 Manholes cannot be located in landscaped areas unless they are located within an access road per City standards are provided. 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2"x I I" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year- round source of water(MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals,or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall Page 43 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 231 of 272 be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at(208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits beyond that required for the community center. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing,landscaping, amenities, etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. Page 44 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 232 of 272 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridianciU.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=181966&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Lty D. POLICE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridianciU.orgj ebLink/DocView.aspx?id=182147&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ky E. PARK'S DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridianciLy.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=184769&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC i &cr=1 F. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO(COMPASS) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.asp x?id=182235&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC hty G. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT https://weblink.meridiancity.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=182768&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC hty H. BOISE PROJECT BOARD OF CONTROL https://weblink.meridiancioy.org WWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=182167&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC hty I. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridianciU.ory WWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=182158&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC hty Page 45 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 233 of 272 J. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.gyp x?id=182145&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC K. WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT(WASD) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=183173&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC hty L. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https://weblink.meridianci02.org/WeUink/Doc View.aspx?id=183196&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC X. FINDINGS A. Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant a rezone, the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the proposed rezone and subsequent development plan is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan for the MU-NFL UM designation. (See section V above for more information) 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment and development complies with the purpose statement of the residential districts in that it will contribute toward the range of housing opportunities available within the City; and with the purpose statement of the commercial districts in that it will provide for the retail and service needs of the community consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare as the proposed medium density residential uses, storage facility and commercial retail and office uses should be compatible with adjacent existing and future residential, commercial and public/quasi public development. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The City Council finds City services are available to be provided to this development. The school district submitted comments stating that the elementary and high schools are currently under enrollment capacity but that the middle school is over capacity. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. This finding is not applicable as the request is for a rezone, not annexation. Page 46 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 234 of 272 B. Preliminary Plat Findings: In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; The City Council finds that the proposed plat with Staffs recommendations is in substantial compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density, transportation, and pedestrian connectivity. Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies in, Section V of this report for more information. 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds that public services will be provided to the subject property upon development. (See Exhibit B of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers) 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the development at their own cost, the City Council finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development based upon comments from the public service providers (i.e., Police, Fire, ACHD, etc.). (See Section IXfor more information) 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and, The City Council is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated with the platting of this property. ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The City Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that exist on this site that require preserving. C. Conditional Use Permit(UDC 11-513-6E) The Commission shall base its determination on the Conditional Use Permit request upon the following: 1. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located. The City Council finds that the subject property is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and dimensional and development regulations of the C-C district(see Analysis, Section Vfor more information). 2. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accord with the requirements of this Title. Page 47 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 235 of 272 The City Council finds that the proposed storage facility is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan FL UM designation of MU-N and is allowed as a conditional use in UDC Table 11-2B-2 in the C-C zoning district. Further, the City Council finds the proposed use of the site will provide a needed service within close proximity to residential uses. 3. That the design, construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area. The City Council finds that if the applicant complies with the conditions outlined in this report, the operation of the proposed self-service storage facility should be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing and intended character of the area. 4. That the proposed use,if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed,will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. The City Council finds that if the applicant complies with the conditions outlined in this report, the proposed use will not adversely affect other property in the area. 5. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, schools,parks,police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal,water,and sewer. The City Council finds that essential public services are available to this property and that the use will be adequately served by these facilities. A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(UDC 11-7-5): Upon recommendation from the Commission,the Council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant a planned development request,the Council shall make the following findings: l. The planned unit development demonstrates exceptional high quality in site design through the provision of cohesive, continuous,visually related and functionally linked patterns of development, street and pathway layout, and building design. The City Council finds the proposed PUD demonstrates a high quality of development and site design with amenities that provides unique housing options for those 55 and older in the community. 2. The planned unit development preserves the significant natural, scenic and/or historic features. The City Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic and/or historic features that may exist on this site. 3. The arrangement of uses and/or structures in the development does not cause damage,hazard, or nuisance to persons or property in the vicinity. The City Council finds the proposed use and development of this property will not cause damage, hazard or nuisance to persons or property in the vicinity. 4. The internal street,bike and pedestrian circulation system is designed for the efficient and safe flow of vehicles,bicyclists and pedestrians without having a disruptive influence upon the activities and functions contained within the development,nor place an undue burden upon existing transportation and other public services in the surrounding area. Page 48 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 236 of 272 The City Council finds the internal private streets should provide for safe internal access to homes within the development and proposed pedestrian pathway will provide a safe bicycle and pedestrian route to the adjacent commercial development. 5. Community facilities, such as a park,recreational, and dedicated open space areas are functionally related and accessible to all dwelling units via pedestrian and/or bicycle pathways. The City Council finds the proposed subdivision amenities (i.e. swimming pool, community center and outdoor activity area) are accessible to residents within the development via internal sidewalks. 6. The proposal complies with the density and use standards requirements in accord with chapter 2, "District Regulations", of this title. The City Council finds the proposed single-family residential use of the development is a principal permitted use in the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts and falls within the density desired in this area. 7. The amenities provided are appropriate in number and scale to the proposed development. The City Council finds the proposed amenities are appropriate for this development and provide a variety of entertainment for residents. 8. The planned unit development is in conformance with the comprehensive plan. The City Council finds the proposed PUD is in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. E. PRIVATE STREET(UDC 11 3F-4) In order to approve the application,the Director shall find the following: 1. The design of the private street meets the requirements of this Article; The Director finds design of the proposed private streets complies with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4A except as approved through alternative compliance. See analysis in Section V for more information. 2. Granting approval of the private street would not cause damage hazard, or nuisance, or other detriment to persons,property,or uses in the vicinity; and The Director finds the proposed private streets shouldn't cause any hazard, nuisance or other detriment to persons,property or uses in the vicinity if they are designed as proposed and constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4B. 3. The use and location of the private street shall not conflict with the comprehensive plan and/or the regional transportation plan. The Director finds the location of the private streets does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and/or the regional transportation plan. 4. The proposed residential development(if applicable)is a mew or gated development. The Director finds the proposed gated residential development includes mews. F. ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE(UDC 11-3A-19.2A) In order to grant approval for alternative compliance,the director shall determine the following findings: Page 49 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 237 of 272 l. Strict adherence or application of the requirements is not feasible; OR While it's feasible for the applicant to comply with UDC standards pertaining to private streets, the Director finds the proposed development offers a unique design as proposed with the planned unit development. 2. The alternative compliance provides an equal or superior means for meeting the requirements; and The Director finds the planned unit development proposed by the applicant as a whole provides an equal or superior means for meeting the requirements in that it contributes to the unique character and diversity in housing types available within the City. 3. The alternative means will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or impair the intended uses and character of the surrounding properties. The Director finds that the proposed alternative means will not be detrimental to the public welfare or impair the intended use%haracter of the surrounding properties and will actually contribute to the character and variety of housing types in this area of the City. Page 50 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 238 of 272 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 3.1-1. Presenter: Kim Warren, MPR Pathways Project Manager Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item - Pathways Agreement Between the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District and the City of Meridian for TM Crossing No. 4 Path Agreement I& mum ATTACHMENTS: Descriptio T NMI D Path Agreement-TM Crossing No.4 Agreements /Contracts 4/23/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 239 of 272 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-058052 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=8 NIKOLA OLSON 0511812020 08:59 AM NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIG DIST NO FEE TM Crossing 44 11111111111111111111III11111111111111111111111111 00782589202000580520080088 AGREEMENT AGREEMENT,made and entered into this day of ,2020,by and between NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT,an irrigation district rganized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Idaho,hereinafter referred to as the"District,"and THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,a political subdivision and municipality of the State of Idaho hereinafter referred to as the"City," WITNha§ETH: WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into a Master Pathway Agreement For Developing and Maintaining Pathways for public use along and across some of the District's ditches and within some of the District's easements and fee title lands dated December 19,2000,accorded as Instrument No. 100102999, records of Ada County,Idaho,hereinafter referred to as the"Master Pathway Agreement;"and, WHEREAS, the District and the City intended by entering the Master Pathway Agreement to accomplish the following in a manner that is consistent with their respcctive legal and fiduciary responsibilities;to enhance the City's pathway planning though early consultation between the City and the District;to establish a process forthe City's submission ofpathway requests and the District's consideration of such requests; and to provide the general conditions for the District's approval and authorization of pathway requests affecting the District's ditches,property,operations and maintenance;and, WHEREAS, the District grants to the City the right develop pathways to encroach within the District's easements along and across the District's ditches,canals and easements therefor upon the terms and conditions of said Master Pathway Agreement and after the execution of an agreement for each proposed crossing and encroachment;and, WHEREAS,the City is the owner of the real property easement/right of way(burdened with the casement of the District hereinafter mentioned)particularly described in the"Legal Description"attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference made a part hereof and, WHEREAS, the District controls the inigation/drainage ditch or canal known as the PURDAM DRAIN (hereinafter referred to as "ditch or canal")together with the real property and/or easements to convey irrigation and drainage water, to operate and maintain the ditch or canal, and which crosses and intersects said described teal properly of the City as shown on Exhibit B attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof;and, WHEREAS,the City desires approval to construct, install,operate and maintain a paved pathway within the District's easement for the Purdam Drain under the terms and conditions of said Master Pathway Agreement and those hereinafter set forth, AGREEMENT-Page 1 NOW,THEREFORE,forand in consideration ofthe premises and of the covenants,agreements and conditions hereinafter set forth and those set forth in said Master Pathway Agreement,the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The City may construct, operate, maintain and repair a 10 foot wide asphalt pedestrian pathway within the District's real property and/or casement for the Purdam Drain at TM Grossing No.4, located northeast of the intersection of Ten Mile Road and Interstate 84 in Meridian,Ada County,Idaho. 2. Any construction, widening or crossing of said ditch or canal shall be performed in accordance with the"Special Conditions"stated in Exhibit C,attached hereto and by this reference made part thereof. 3. The permitted hours of use of the pathway shall be from one half hour before sunrise and one half hour after sunset. 4. The parties hereto incorporate in and snake part of this Agreement all the covenants, conditions, and agreements of said Master Pathway Agreement unchanged except as the result of the provisions of this Agreement. The covenants,conditions and agreements herein contained and incorporated by reference shall constitute covenants to run with,and running with,all of the lands of the City described in said Exhibit A, and shall be binding on each of the parties hereto and on all parties and all persons claiming under theta or either of them,and the advantages hereof shall inure to the benefit of each of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the District has hereunto caused its corporate name to be subscribed by its officers fast hereunto duly authorized by resolution of its Board of Directors and the City has hereunto subscribed its corporate name to be subscribed and its seal to be affixed thereto,all as of the day and year herein first above written. �o`AN IR � NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT OFFICIAL v y 6' jUd coB Its President ATTEST: Its Secretary OF MERIDIAN 5 By AGREEMENT-Page 2 �a Jwrs 01 n i Lo 'a ATTEST: City of 1 J - 7 TSEAL jt STATE OF ID O } ss: County of Canyon ) On this S day of _ _ ,2020,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Will atterson and Daren R. Coon,]mown to me to be the President and Secretary, respectively,of NAMPA& MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT, the irrigation district that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that such irrigation district executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,Ihave bereunto set myhand and affixedmy official seat,the day and year in this certificate first above written, Er CHANEE GRANT COMMISSION#63457 otary Public for NOTARY PUBLIC Residing at ,Idaho STATE OF 1DA1-IO My Commission Expires:a-4 Aj1 ';ko�kf STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss: County of Ada ) On WsQ�day of�,�,��� ,2020,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared' , C.L ,� and Cv. .•J'0 ,�,known to me to be the and C (, , ,respectively,of The CITY OF MERIDIAN,the entity that executed the foregoing instJ�t and acknowledged to me that such entity executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal,the day and year in this certificate first above W6ftltA•. ••• E WA� OTA • '�; `� ; Notaq1'u is f r S�,ANo A;"COMMISSION""O Res, ��� d No.42553 My Commission Expires: 8 2-r Zo7� •;rE of [04`�:• AGREEMENT-Page 3 EXHIBIT A Legal Description A right-of-way/easement located within TM Crossing Subdivision No.4 in the El/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section 14, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, B.M., Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and is more particularly described in Exhibit A-1 attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. EXHIBIT B Location of Property/Drain See Exhibit C-1 attached hereto. EXHIBIT C Special Conditions a. The location and construction of the pathway shall be in accordance with Exhibit C-1, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. b. The District's easement along this section of the Purdam Drain includes a sufficient area of land to convey irrigation and drainage water,to operate,clean,maintain and repair the Purdam Drain,and to access the Purdam Drain for said purposes and is a minimum of 85 feet,35 feet to the left and 50 feet to the right of the centerline looking downstream at this location. C. Construction shall be completed one year from the date of this agreement. Time if of the essence. AGREEMENT-Page 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 243 of 272 krn E N G I N E E R I N G April 15,2020 Project No.18-160 Pathway Easement Legal Description Exhibit A A parcel of land for a Pathway Easement,situated in a portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 14,Township 3 North,Range 1 West,B.M.,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap marking the Center 1/4 corner of said Section 14,which bears S89•11'30"E a distance of 2,656.47 feet from a found aluminum cap marking the West 1/4 corner of said Section 14,thence following the easterly line of said Southwest 1/4,S00.35'29"W a distance of 1,280.19 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence following said easterly line,S00.35'29"W a distance of 14.11 feet; Thence leaving said easterly line,N82.15'46"W a distance of 139.74 feet; Thence N89.36'50"W a distance of 257.85 feet; Thence N00.44'32"E a distance of 14.00 feet; Thence S89.36'50"E a distance of 258.66 feet; Thence S82.15'46"E a distance of 138.88 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 5,566 square feet,more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights-of-way of record or implied. All subdivisions,deeds,record of surveys,and other instruments of record referenced herein are recorded documents of the county in which these described lands are situated in. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is hereby made a part of. L LAND E N SF'o 1 . 662 LP �O �91f OF �oP� F�(Y KEHR�" LA I 9233 West State Street Boise,Idaho 83714 208.639.6939 • kmengllp.com Meridian Cif -(KNr1aitAet�rygR@@&ApQh2 2020— Page 244 of 272 i 258.66 257.85 139.74 Title: Date:04-15-2020 Scale: 1 inch=80 feet File: Tract 1: 0.128 Acres: 5566 Sq Feet:Closure=n89.0700e 0.01 Feet: Precision=1/127200: Perimeter=823 Feet 001=s00.3529w 14.11 004=n00.4432e 14.00 002=n82.1546w 139.74 005=s89.3650e 258.66 003=n89.3650w 257.85 006=s82.I 546e 138.88 Meridian Cif-lKblrIaitAet�rygR@@&2pafA 2020— Page 245 of 272 BASIS OF BEARINGS POINT OF COMMENCEMENT S89'11'30"E 2656.47' CENTER 1/4 CORNER v - V — — — SECTION 14 •_. WEST 1/4 CORNER SECTION 14 v H -a, Ci z N _ H CO O) � h In Uj LA UNPLATTED o O rn a: a POINT OF TM CROSSING 589.36'50"E 256.66' �L4-�� BEGINNING SUBDIVISION N0.2 7N89'367'501V 257.85' ZZ [LON FAMILY TRUST- ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST INTERSTATE 84 O a a x 8 LINE TABLE a LINE# LENGTH I DIRECTION o - — 3 L1 14.11 SO'35'29"W N L2 139.74 N82'15'46"W 0 N L3 14.00 NO'44'32"E Q W L4 138.88 S82'15'46"E x 0 75 150 300 PL LAND Plan Scale 49 a /1`bfi62 LEGEND FOUND ALUMINUM CAP OF o 0 CALCULATED POINT KEH�'� PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE o —SECTION LINE ———————EASEMENT LINE E N G I N E E R I N G m 9233 WEST STATE STREET x BOISE.IDAHO 83714 PHONE 1208)639-6939 Exhibit B kmengllp.com City of Meridian Pathway Easement DATE: April,-2020 PROJECT: 18-160 s SHEET: Situated in a portion of the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, 1 OF 1 Sec.14,T.3N.,RAW.,B.M.,City of Meridian,Ada County,ID o: Meridian Ci1_IKNr1aitAet�rygR@@ea 3IpQU 2020- Page 246 of 272 Nou3n)JISNOJ HOi 03AONddtl ` _ a % Y — Wd3dVDSON71 W7 OHtl01 N'dI01H3W 3 �� •, exmwlev� rc r b•ON 9NISSOH)Wl g c ll�t S J 2 P Ip f 66 g h ppgaY G 2 AY @ 113 7., 1 Y— - 4*x ��$aa J. Id. $sy p,�€e 8 NE d I ia' y'F�yii 1•,� I I a 0 1 is -� 7i I 1:e i eas+" xvuc a` :lil tNJ 'R In[R5 I — i k ■ S I g Y Y6�_..---—'-T� 7� i,s:aWW;aI.}�li.lIm�1Il'o'Jy- -��� �4�,r��.'�7•.�1Y✓''.',[y��h,r C'�.y_i',''� �_F._., 4T 3+ —I--I. �1 w1r,J va ao!n anm M� eC 0 �€p€Yyg G 3 Y 8ySy g$9 will lilt, 1 9F1 7-1 16 111611% , d i b 58. gdi 71 b P leell i € ' �`�, •�Ird - fiyl .e'-�'— _'.r _=• 6 3i [ @ d 67� #�$e Y $ WIN 1 1 I 1 rF $2 EE I I II 1 i I �a� 5 •# �a 1 .rcF I I is '�{��it " � r .L.r:_r,r � • P Ie pg n+eea ne -r F Q y s m -Io: F' L:tj1N I- a x �• 10 1 II i I I Gltll I k � k 111$ 1 Y tl 6 b lI f I Q�Q@ Meridian CitF3xhibiibraet,1g RcRge AprOf8j 2020- Page 247 of 272 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 3.1. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item - City of Meridian Financial Report - March 2020 N&L— ATTACHMENTS: City of Meridian Financial Report- March 2020 Cover Memo 4/22/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 248 of 272 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 3.J. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item -AP Invoices for Payment-04/23/20 -$1,242,551.95 ATTACHMENTS: load AP Invoices for Payment Cover Memo 4/23/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 249 of 272 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment-Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund A&i DISTRIBUTORS oil for equipment-qty 9 881.04 01 General Fund ALICE JEROME Refund: Shoshone Falls Trip Cancelled Due to 116.60 COVID-19 01 General Fund ALLEGIANT POWDER COATING, LLC powder coat dog park drinking fountain-qty 1 375.00 01 General Fund ASTRID LATENDRESSE Refund: Cust Req Ref due to COVID-19 Health Risks 42.40 01 General Fund AVOLVE SOFTWARE CORPORATION 18-0386 Assurance Services: CR07162019 Work 956.25 Related to synci 01 General Fund AVOLVE SOFTWARE CORPORATION 18-0386 Assurance Services: CR07312019 Discussion, 393.75 understan 01 General Fund AVOLVE SOFTWARE CORPORATION 18-0386 Assurance Services: CRO8132019 TSI Field 675.00 Implementat 01 General Fund AVOLVE SOFTWARE CORPORATION 18-0386 Assurance Services: CR10232019 225.00 Suggestions/implement 01 General Fund BILLING DOCUMENT SPECIALISTS 20-0004 W/S/T billings 4/6&delinquents 4/8 265.92 01 General Fund BLR-BUSINESS&LEGAL RESOURCES ORDER# 18880538-R5; B. NARY HR Law Letter 511.00 renewal 01 General Fund BRADY INDUSTRIES, LLC. 220/Janitorial, Dishwasher soap,Sta. 6 69.09 01 General Fund BRADY INDUSTRIES, LLC. 220/Janitorial,Sta.4, Detergent,paper towels,TP 324.23 01 General Fund BRODY CHEMICAL INC. Grounds Water Feature Chlorine Chemicals Qty.6 1,365.26 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Battery for Unit# 154 162.00 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Cabin Air Filter for Unit# 157 26.30 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC LOF,ATF Svc,Canister Purge Valve for Engine Light, # 351.85 151 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil change and Tires for Unit# 166 655.00 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil change for Unit# 19 60.00 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Tire replacement Vehicle#6 K Pitt C20996 146.62 01 General Fund CAMPBELL TRACTOR INC. lawn mower blades-qty 3 67.86 01 General Fund CDW GOVERNMENT CradlePoint lyr Netcloud Essentials 3,260.00 01 General Fund CDW GOVERNMENT Havis 2pt Docking Station (2,940.00) 01 General Fund CLIMA-TECH CORPORATION 20-0011 HVAC Software Support Services Agreement 3,097.50 to 9/30 01 General Fund CLOVERDALE NURSERY sod for Heroes Park-qty 200 SF 60.00 01 General Fund CLOVERDALE NURSERY sod for Settlers Park -qty 2,250 SF 675.00 01 General Fund CLOVERDALE NURSERY topsoil for Settlers Park shelter sod project-qty 15 yds 262.50 01 General Fund COMMERCIAL TIRE 220/Tire Rotation-MF021 125.00 01 General Fund COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOC COMPASS FY2020 Third Quarter Dues 4,171.45 01 General Fund D&B SUPPLY ball field shade cloth hardware at Discovery Park-qty 8 74.92 01 General Fund D&B SUPPLY screws for Kleiner Park light bollards-qty 3 4.77 01 General Fund D&B SUPPLY tie downs for fleet truck 2-qty 2 19.38 Date:4/23/20 12:48:13 PM Page:1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 250 of 272 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment-Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund DATATEL Had Mitel Remote into the director and fix the firmware 125.00 of t 01 General Fund DAVID WUERTH instructor fee-Digital Photography 3/3-3/24/20-city 5 120.00 01 General Fund DIGLINE,INC. 20-0010 Notification Sub.for Undground Pwr Locates 1,799.98 to 3/31 01 General Fund DISASTER KLEENUP 220/Station #3 leak, Damage to flooring, Repair 18,633.46 Services 01 General Fund DISASTER KLEENUP 220/final repair for leak St. 1 ladies restroom 2,632.12 01 General Fund DISTINCTIVE MILLWORK&SPEC Countertop Repair Chiefs Office 343.00 01 General Fund DMH ENTERPRISES 20-0035 FY20 Plumbing Plan Review&Inspection Svcs 60,087.88 Mar 2020 01 General Fund ERGOMETRICS 220/Promotional testing fee for current employees 3,895.56 01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER Diag&R&R Siren Speaker for Unit# 527 117.00 SERVICES,INC. 01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER Push Bump[er Brackets for Unit# 166 146.34 SERVICES,INC. 01 General Fund FAMILY TANG SOO DO instructor fee-Martial Arts 3/3-3/31/20-qty 10 146.00 01 General Fund FASTENAL COMPANY metric bolts for Lanark Parks Shop-qty 60 22.35 01 General Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. pipe end plugs for City Hall water feature-qty 2 19.23 01 General Fund GEOTEK, INC. 20-0190 Commercial&Residential Bldg Inspections 20,020.00 3/2020 01 General Fund GIESLER AUTO REPAIR fleet truck 8 repairs-license C18529 1,311.33 01 General Fund GIESLER AUTO REPAIR repairs for fleet truck 22-license C10914 448.99 01 General Fund GLENN WILSON EducReimb:G.Wilson,Winter 2020,Eastern Oregon 957.00 University, BA 01 General Fund GRAINGER 220/DEF 55 gallon,Sta.4 434.75 01 General Fund GREAT FLOORS 20-0143 220/New floor installation St. 3,less retainage 28,372.70 01 General Fund GREAT FLOORS 220/Replacement Flooring,Sta. #2 28,192.20 01 General Fund HENRY SCHEIN, Inc 220/Cleanable med bags(12)for COVID Responses 3,806.04 01 General Fund HENRY SCHEIN,Inc 220/2 boxes 1000/bx thermometer probe covers 138.40 01 General Fund HENRY SCHEIN, Inc 220/EMS Cabinet for St 6(second cabinet) 1,370.30 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 220/lag screws,shields,St. 6 shop 48.71 01 General Fund HORIZON DISTRIBUTORS INC small engine parts-qty 60 237.45 01 General Fund HRATV R.WHITE ASSOCIATE 03/2020-03/2021 MEMBERSHIP 100.00 01 General Fund IDAHO ASSOC OF BUILDING OFFICIALS CEU trainings for Inspectors/Plan Review team IDABO 2,175.00 2020 01 General Fund IDAHO KENDO KAI INC instructor fee-Kendo Advanced Japanese Fencing 140.00 3/5-3/26/20 01 General Fund IDAHO NURSERY ASSOCIATION 2020-2021 Friend of Horticulture member dues for 75.00 MPR Dept. Date:4/23/20 12:48:13 PM Page:2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 251 of 272 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment-Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund IDAHO POWER 2200773816,City Hall Power April 2020 5,741.79 01 General Fund IDAHO POWER 2205054725, Police Power April 2020 2,492.08 01 General Fund IDAHO POWER 2224444402 Fuller Park April 2020 618.42 01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Allmon Subdivision Annexation 51.06 01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Class fee Schedule for Parks 103.11 01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Lavender Heights Annexation and Zoning 52.54 01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Victory Commons Prelim Plat,Teakwood Place AZ, 67.34 Cedarbrook 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE POLICE PD MARCH 2O20 FINGER PRINTING/BACKGROUND 266.00 CHECKS 01 General Fund INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONAL New Hire Tests 445.00 SOLUTIONS, INC. 01 General Fund INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONAL Testing for New Hires 400.00 SOLUTIONS, INC. 01 General Fund JACKSON CODE CONSULTANTS,INC 20-0064 Fire Plan Review and Inspection Services 67,878.83 FY20 Mar 01 General Fund JEREMY WESTHUIS Refund issued for Incomplete Winter Basketball 51.49 Tournament 01 General Fund JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE 20-0054 Alarm monitoring City-wide Facilities May 2020 372.84 PROTECTION LP 01 General Fund JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE 20-0054 Alarm Monitoring Homecourt May 2020 35.00 PROTECTION LP 01 General Fund K9TACTICALGEAR.COM Bite Wedge for K9 Tuso 61.00 01 General Fund KATHY DRURY-BOGLE, PHR 20-0085 Consulting Services-City Training-March 2,000.00 2020 01 General Fund KENDALL FORD OF MERIDIAN Ignition Coil Boots 24.36 01 General Fund KENDALL FORD OF MERIDIAN steps for fleet truck 20 repair 340.00 01 General Fund L.N.CURTIS AND SONS 20-0208 220/turnout boots,size 9M 407.89 01 General Fund L.N.CURTIS AND SONS 220/Blauer LS Shirts(2),Winkler 161.71 01 General Fund L.N.CURTIS AND SONS 220/Blauer Pants(1),Griffin 88.64 01 General Fund L.N.CURTIS AND SONS 220/Blauer Shirts(2), Pants(1),Orr 213.31 01 General Fund L.N.CURTIS AND SONS 220/Credit on Blauer Pants(4) Butterfield Orig. (330.00) Inv.321215 01 General Fund L.N.CURTIS AND SONS 220/50 ft lifeline rope, received per J.Winkler 78.52 01 General Fund LAWN CO MAINTENANCE 20-0222 price code#1/landscape maintenance 19,660.00 contract 04/2020 01 General Fund LAWN CO MAINTENANCE 20-0222 price code#3/landscape maintenance 6,240.00 contract 04/2020 01 General Fund LAWN CO MAINTENANCE Grind out Tree Stump,Instal Drain Sump con.to Down 2,206.12 Spout f Date:4/23/20 12:48:13 PM Page:3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 252 of 272 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment-Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund LAZYBOY FURNITURE GALLERIES 220/Recliner for St. 6 769.98 01 General Fund LEXIS NEXIS On line legal research March, 2020 130.00 01 General Fund LORI WARWICK Refund Issues for Incomplete Winter Basketball 51.49 Tournament 01 General Fund MARK AND VICKIE DAHL Refund: Cust Req Ref due to COVID-19 Health Risks 42.40 01 General Fund MEMORIAL MONUMENTS,INC. 2020 Arbor Day Celebration plaque for Willow Creek 140.00 Elem x 1 01 General Fund MERIDIAN AUTOMOTIVE&MACHINE Inspection for G100 Form for Unit# 131 Vin584161 96.25 2015 Chevy 01 General Fund MERIDIAN AUTOMOTIVE&MACHINE Inspection for G100 Form on Unit# 139 96.25 01 General Fund MERIDIAN AUTOMOTIVE&MACHINE Inspection for G100 Form on Unit#44 VIN156309 96.25 01 General Fund MERIDIAN AUTOMOTIVE&MACHINE Inspection for G100 Form Unit# 141 Vin205846 2014 96.25 Chevy Ta 01 General Fund MERIDIAN AUTOMOTIVE&MACHINE Inspection For G100 Form Unit# 142 VIN586675 96.25 01 General Fund MERIDIAN AUTOMOTIVE&MACHINE Inspection for G100 form Unit# 23 Vin197704 2010 96.25 Dodge Char 01 General Fund MERIDIAN AUTOMOTIVE&MACHINE Inspection for G100 Form Unit# 524 Vin582830 2015 96.25 Chevy Tah 01 General Fund MERIDIAN AUTOMOTIVE&MACHINE Oil change,Inspection for G100 form, Unit# 143 167.47 01 General Fund MERIDIAN AUTOMOTIVE&MACHINE Power Steering Pump,System Flush,Oil Change, 907.05 Inspection 01 General Fund MERIDIAN MISSIONARY GOSPEL Refund:A-2020-0075 Sulamita Church Not Req to 160.00 CHURCH Submit App 01 General Fund MODERN PRINTERS Business Cards, Posters, Brochures&Bookmarks 379.00 01 General Fund MODERN PRINTERS Finance Envelopes; Window&Regular Qty. 5000 488.00 01 General Fund MODERN PRINTERS Inspector Tags-Plumbing Qty.2000 192.00 01 General Fund MODERN PRINTERS MUBS April Newsletters(1st batch&inserts) 201.00 01 General Fund MODERN PRINTERS Parking Notice Books for Code Enf. 459.00 01 General Fund MOTOROLA Hand Mics for Mobile/Vehicle Radios-Inventory 148.92 01 General Fund MOUNTAIN HOME AUTO RANCH 2O-0109 2020 Ford Explorer Hybrid Patrol Unit#116 37,887.75 Vin#C10396 01 General Fund NAOMI MILLER Refund:Customer Withdrew Participation for Spring 255.00 League 01 General Fund NAPA AUTO PARTS 220/Shop Supplies,Sta. 6 Cleaners 273.14 01 General Fund NAPA AUTO PARTS Wipers for Unit# 11 27.69 01 General Fund NORCO 220/36 safety glasses, PPE 57.60 01 General Fund NORCO 220/72 pr safety glasses 144.72 01 General Fund NORCO 220/calibration gas for SCBA compressor&gas meters 384.00 01 General Fund NORCO cylinder rental for welding gas-March 2020 32.55 01 General Fund NORTHWEST SAFETY CLEAN 220/Turnout pant repair 111.00 Date:4/23/20 12:48:13 PM Page:4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 253 of 272 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment-Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS,INC. Dismiss chemicals-qty 2 218.00 01 General Fund NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS,INC. MSO for Lanark Parks Shop-qty 25 gallons 46.85 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. 2-WHITE COPY PAPER,2 PK NOTEPADS,PAPER CLIPS, 124.58 3-PK POST-ITS 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. 220/Office Supplies, Paper pads,T-z Tape 46.70 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. closed signs for all parks-qty 100 146.00 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. duster x 1 pk; computer mouse x 1 36.11 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Tully Skate Park&Dog Park social distancing signs- 327.24 qty 12 01 General Fund OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK,& Union Arbitration matter through 02/29/20 148.00 STEWART 01 General Fund ON THE SPOT CLEANERS#15 220/Dry cleaning,Class A uniforms(2) 21.00 01 General Fund ON THE SPOT CLEANERS#15 Dry Cleaning PD Uniforms 1,122.00 01 General Fund PACIFIC BACKFLOW LLC 220/Backflow repair,Stations 2-5 693.25 01 General Fund POSITIVE CONCEPTS Paper for E-Cite Printers 195.00 01 General Fund PRECOM HOLDINGS LLC 20-0201 Fiber from City Hall to 911 Dispatch 27,205.15 01 General Fund PREMIER SIGNS 220/logos for new pub ed transit van 150.00 01 General Fund QUALITY ELECTRIC 20-0177 FY20 Street Light Underground Pwr Locates to 4,710.68 3/23/20 01 General Fund RODDA PAINT COMPANY paint&supplies for Storey Park picnic shelter-qty 7 223.01 01 General Fund RODDA PAINT COMPANY picnic table paint for all parks-qty 1 209.21 01 General Fund RODDA PAINT COMPANY restroom paint for all parks-qty 1 185.24 01 General Fund SAFEBUILT LLC 20-0095 Building/Mechanical Plan Review Svcs 3/2020 92,776.29 01 General Fund SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP 20-0162 Annual Elevator Service Contract MCH to 6/30 1,755.00 01 General Fund SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP 20-0162 Annual Elevator Service Contract MPD to 6/30 585.00 01 General Fund SHANNON LIND instructor fee-Gentle Movement Stretch 3/4-3/25/20 78.40 01 General Fund SHRED-IT USA, LLC. 220/Paper Shredding-Admin, Bin Sta. 6 74.93 01 General Fund SIGNS, ETC a-frames for COVID-19 closure signs-qty 7 431.20 01 General Fund SIGNS, ETC magnet restroom closed signs for maintenance-qty 30 450.00 01 General Fund SIGNS, ETC playground closed signs-qty 145 617.00 01 General Fund SILVER CREEK SUPPLY light bulbs for snowflakes-qty 3,825 3,029.40 01 General Fund SIRCHIE FINGERPRINT LABS,INC Evidence Shop Supplies 141.75 01 General Fund SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY lath stakes for playground shutdown signs-qty 3 84.00 01 General Fund SPECIALTY MINING&INFIELD infield mix: Bear Creek,Tully,&HMS ball fields x 120 8,710.00 SUPPLIES yds 01 General Fund SPOKANE PACKAGING Firearms Targets Qty. 1925 2,387.00 01 General Fund SPOKANE PACKAGING firearms Training Targets 1,007.00 01 General Fund STEELMAN PLUMBING 220/repair water heater,St. 3 1,348.50 01 General Fund STEELMAN PLUMBING Plumber Called to Check Drain&Toilets 90.00 01 General Fund STEELMAN PLUMBING toilet replacement at Homecourt 142.50 Date:4/23/20 12:48:13 PM Page:5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 254 of 272 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment-Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON 439865654877; 220/coffee pot,furnishings,St.4 39.99 01 General Fund SYRINGA NETWORKS, LLC 20-0040 Dark Fiber(4 Strands)April 2020 1,150.00 01 General Fund SYRINGA NETWORKS, LLC Internet B/W(100MB)April 2020 790.00 01 General Fund TERRA ENVIRO CONSULTING,INC. soils testing at 5 parks 1,200.00 01 General Fund THE UPS STORE 220/send in air sample for testing 18.11 01 General Fund TRANSUNION RISK&ALTERNATIVE TLOxp Charges&Credits March 2020 358.30 DATA SOLUTIONS 01 General Fund TREASURE VALLEY COFFEE Coffee,Hot Choc,Cream,Sugar,Cups&Cooler Rental 372.74 01 General Fund TREASURE VALLEY STEEL,INC. metal for Bear Creek Park dugout roofs 1,966.97 01 General Fund TREND LETTERS 20-0262 220/10,000 N95 Face masks,COVID 20,500.00 01 General Fund ULTRA TOUCH CAR WASH Interior Detail Unit# 152-Covid-19 98.95 01 General Fund ULTRA TOUCH CAR WASH Interior Detail Unit# 156- 11167-Covid-19 78.95 01 General Fund ULTRA TOUCH CAR WASH Interior Detail Unit# 166-Covid-19 98.95 01 General Fund ULTRA TOUCH CAR WASH Interior Detail/Sanitize 15 PD Vehicles 1,484.25 01 General Fund ULTRA TOUCH CAR WASH Interior Details on Patrol Units Qty 10 989.50 01 General Fund UNIFORMS 2 GEAR New Hire Gear-Shaw 858.74 01 General Fund UNIFORMS 2 GEAR Replacement Carrier for Figal 117.72 01 General Fund VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT 20-0102 VRT Capital and Service Enhancement Cont 419,000.00 for FY 2020 01 General Fund VERIFIED FIRST Refund: Customer withdrew participation for Spring 750.00 League 01 General Fund WASHINGTON ASSOC OF BUILDING Job Posting for Plan Review Supervisor 50.00 OFFICIALS 01 General Fund WEIDNER&ASSOCIATES 20-0210 220/Turnout gloves, 138 pairs 9,338.00 01 General Fund WIENHOFF&ASSOCIATES,INC PO 20-0123 FY20 Alcohol&Controlled Substance Test 780.00 March 20 01 General Fund WIENHOFF&ASSOCIATES,INC Pre Employment Testing 60.00 01 General Fund XEROX CORPORATION -PASADENA Xerox 7845 base March 2020; click 2/21-3/21/20; 424.14 MX4-506016 Total 01 General Fund 956,248.34 07 Impact Fund BLUE SKY CONSULTING SERVICES, LLC 19-0264 220/St. 6 Final invoice 7,270.00 Total 07 Impact Fund 7,270.00 20 Grant Fund MURRAYSMITH INC 20-0205 Steetlight design for Meridian Middle School to 3,487.50 governmental 3/31 20 Grant Fund MURRAYSMITH INC 20-0205 Str. Light CDBG Meridian Middle School Desgn 6,179.50 governmental to 2/29 Date:4/23/20 12:48:13 PM Page:6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 255 of 272 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment-Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount Total 20 Grant Fund 9,667.00 governmental 60 Enterprise AIR FILTER SUPERSTORE WHOLESALE HVAC filters(24 qty) 109.92 Fund LLC 60 Enterprise AIR FILTER SUPERSTORE WHOLESALE HVAC Filters(72 qty) 325.92 Fund LLC 60 Enterprise ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC. PO#20-0005, Bacti Sampling 1,656.80 Fund 60 Enterprise AUMA ACTUATORS INC Labor&parts to repair flow control valve(6 hrs) 1,320.50 Fund 60 Enterprise BILLING DOCUMENT SPECIALISTS 20-0004 W/S/T billings 4/6&delinquents 4/8 9,529.57 Fund 60 Enterprise BLACK EAGLE CONSTRUCTION Labor to repair broken manhole collars Q14-57& 6,000.00 Fund M12-144 60 Enterprise BOE-Boise Office Equipment 8TB614975 Copier Costs 03/10/20-04/09/20 64.69 Fund 60 Enterprise BROWN &CALDWELL 20-0214 WRRF Cap Exp B&C Services during Const.to 15,496.74 Fund 2/20 60 Enterprise C-WORKS,INC. Well Maint. &Repair-Well Site Security Clasps 270.00 Fund 60 Enterprise CDW GOVERNMENT Gov Techsmith Camtasia 19 UPG lU 90.96 Fund 60 Enterprise COLE INDUSTRIAL, INC. Labor&materials for annual testing of boiler 3&4 2,743.83 Fund (18.5 h 60 Enterprise COLE INDUSTRIAL,INC. Labor&part to repair boiler 3 at digester 4&5 (6 hrs) 1,024.00 Fund 60 Enterprise COLUMBIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY 120VAC coil to repair audible alarm horn for gas 37.80 Fund detection 60 Enterprise COLUMBIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY Conduit body,conduit nipple,&femail union for stock 244.56 Fund (4 qt 60 Enterprise COLUMBIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY Support agreement for PLC programming software 1,231.00 Fund 60 Enterprise COMMERCIAL TIRE 2 New Tires, Balance,Alignment,C19573,WO#291308 382.99 Fund 60 Enterprise COMMERCIAL TIRE 2 New Tires, Balance,Alignment,C20535,WO#292354 382.99 Fund 60 Enterprise COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOC COMPASS FY2020 Third Quarter Dues 8,469.30 Fund Date:4/23/20 12:48:13 PM Page:7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 256 of 272 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment-Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise CSS GROUP Translore License,Tickets,Tickets over 1000 270.15 Fund 60 Enterprise CURRENTECHNOLOGIES PPE low voltage rubber gloves for JAllen&Maint Staff 70.00 Fund (5 qt 60 Enterprise DC ENGINEERING 20-0156 WWTP Primary Electrical Dist. Syst. Des/Supp 2,250.00 Fund to 3/15 60 Enterprise DIGLINE,INC. Digline Tickets for Locating,Qty 1,364 2,477.02 Fund 60 Enterprise DIVISION OF BLDG SAFETY Annual certification of Lab bldg elevator thru 125.00 Fund 01/16/2025 60 Enterprise DOUG SCHOFIELD Reimb: D.Schofield Pro Sprayer Bottle 13.12 Fund 60 Enterprise EL-ADA,INC. El-Ada March 2020 Services 21.00 Fund 60 Enterprise ENVIRONMENTAL EXPRESS,INC. FIA pump tubing(2 qty) 174.79 Fund 60 Enterprise FASTENAL COMPANY Brass Hex Nuts, 5gl Bucket,Qty 203 378.31 Fund 60 Enterprise FASTENAL COMPANY T-Rod Z.FHN-Z,WEII 11 Packing Change Out,Qty 53.73 Fund 29,WO#291306 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. Materials for Well 24 Rotork Install,Qty 60, 322.64 Fund WO#291319 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. PO#20-0052,tin C2, 1.5in C2, lin,3/4in Meters,Jan 25,341.55 Fund Capital 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. PO#20-0052, Dual Port MXU's,Qty 54 10,152.54 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. Siphon King 36 Pump w/72 Hose,OCCT,Qty 2 67.29 Fund 60 Enterprise FISHER SCIENTIFIC Chlorophyl a filters(4 pk) 392.89 Fund 60 Enterprise FISHER SCIENTIFIC Lysol-COVID 19 2020 35.16 Fund 60 Enterprise GRAINGER Deionized Water, BiMetal Thermometer,Qty 4 98.86 Fund 60 Enterprise HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Stack Tote, Mixing Container,OCCT,Qty 8 68.68 Fund 60 Enterprise HYDRO LOGIC INC 19-0122 Well 15 Reconstruction Phase 2 SDC service 13,345.34 Fund to 3/13 60 Enterprise INTERMOUNTAIN SPECIALTY GASES CL2 Gas Monitor Calibration,Qty 1 300.00 Fund Date:4/23/20 12:48:13 PM Page:8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 257 of 272 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment-Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise JACK HENRY&ASSOCIATES INC Bank Fees March 2020 632.72 Fund 60 Enterprise JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE 20-0054 Alarm monitoring City-wide Facilities May 2020 115.83 Fund PROTECTION LP 60 Enterprise JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE 20-0054 Well 27 Sprinkler Backflow testing to 3-5-20 330.00 Fund PROTECTION LP 60 Enterprise JUB ENGINEERS 19-0373 ACHD Eagle Rd,Amity to Victory,W&S Design 2,723.60 Fund to 2/29 60 Enterprise JUB ENGINEERS 20-0215 Well 31 Wtr Treatment Concept Design to 2/28 4,867.80 Fund 60 Enterprise JUB ENGINEERS PO#20-0193, Risk&Resilence Assessment 12,188.40 Fund 2/1/20-2/29/20 60 Enterprise LAWN CO MAINTENANCE PO#20-0223, Lawn Care for Well Sites,April 2020 2,560.00 Fund 60 Enterprise LAWN CO MAINTENANCE Weed control,spring cleanup,pruning,at 10 lift stations 4,250.00 Fund 60 Enterprise LOPREST WATER TREATMENT Iron, Manganese,Arsenic Removal Pilot,Well 18 Const 9,500.00 Fund COMPANY Project 60 Enterprise MODERN PRINTERS Invoice Labels,Qty 1000 208.00 Fund 60 Enterprise MOUNTAIN HOME AUTO RANCH 2O-0187 Ford F250 truck for Collections#D09470 29,082.04 Fund 60 Enterprise MOUNTAIN WATERWORKS,INC 19-0211 Well 28 Water Treatment Design to 3/20 825.00 Fund 60 Enterprise MOUNTAIN WATERWORKS,INC 20-0108 Sidestream Phosphorus Recovery Prelim Desg. 13,291.44 Fund to 3/20 60 Enterprise MOUNTAIN WATERWORKS,INC 20-0158 Well 17 Water Treatment Design to 3/20 31,723.25 Fund 60 Enterprise MOUNTAIN WATERWORKS,INC PO#18-0530,OCCT Pilot Test 2,652.50 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Clamp,gasket,&hose fitting (37 qty) 120.89 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Clamps to change out suction hose on tertiary filter 3 47.76 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Clamps to change out suction hose on tertiary filter 3 318.40 Fund (40 q 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Grinding discs&sanding pads for grinder(3 qty) 122.82 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Latex gloves for inventory(25 bxs) 282.25 Fund Date:4/23/20 12:48:13 PM Page:9 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 258 of 272 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment-Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Rubber matting for bearing storage in inventory bldg(2 199.30 Fund city) 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Toolbox to store new welder acc on maintenance truck 15.13 Fund C9868 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Woodruff key for Syr maint on spare motor 1 (lpk) 3.98 Fund 60 Enterprise MURRAYSMITH INC 19-0083 Services during Bidding&Const of Project 243.26 Fund FINAL 60 Enterprise MURRAYSMITH INC 19-0083 W/S Repl.Gregory Lift Stat.Aband. Const.to 1,387.76 Fund 2/29 60 Enterprise MURRAYSMITH INC 19-0389 WTR main replacement N. Hickory Ave Design 13,489.00 Fund to 2/29 60 Enterprise MURRAYSMITH INC 19-0389 WTR Mn Replacement N. Hickory Design to 4,049.00 Fund 3/31 60 Enterprise MURRAYSMITH INC 20-0125 WTR Rep&Sewer Ext Pine Ave Const. Serv. 898.50 Fund to 1/31 60 Enterprise MURRAYSMITH INC 20-0125 Wtr Main Repl&Sewer Ext Pine Ave Const.to 286.50 Fund 3/31 60 Enterprise NORCO Cylinder rental for Mar 2020 63.86 Fund 60 Enterprise NORCO Q-fold wipes(4 pk) 347.82 Fund 60 Enterprise NORCO Q-fold wipes(5 cs) 434.77 Fund 60 Enterprise NORCO Terra renew trash can liners for grounds maintenance 293.80 Fund (10 qty 60 Enterprise O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Diesel fuel supplement for emergency pumps(1 city) 14.99 Fund 60 Enterprise O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Thread locker for shop(2 city) 33.98 Fund 60 Enterprise O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Wiper Blades,Interior Cleaner,C20535,WO#292353 45.83 Fund 60 Enterprise OXARC,INC. PO#20-0022,Sodium Hypochlorite Well Sites, 5,160gl 8,765.40 Fund 60 Enterprise PACIFIC BACKFLOW LLC PO#20-0008, Backflow Testing on City Assemblies,Qty 736.00 Fund 8 60 Enterprise PARAMOUNT SUPPLY CO. ASCO coil&ASCO repair kit(2 city) 637.37 Fund 60 Enterprise PAT&DIANA ANDERSON REFUND WT/S/T: 638 W LAWNDALE DR TITLE 91.75 Fund COMPANY OVERPAID Date:4/23/20 12:48:13 PM Page:10 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 259 of 272 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment-Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise POSTNET Backflow March 1st Past Due Letters, Batch 1049,Qty 54.60 Fund 318 60 Enterprise POSTNET Backflow May 1st Reminder Letters, Batch 1051,Qty 1,613.75 Fund 5,024 60 Enterprise PRIEST ELECTRIC Cords for pump 1 submersible drain pumps for repair 95.50 Fund (50 qty) 60 Enterprise RIVERSIDE, INC. Labor&material for machine work on end bell 495.97 Fund 60 Enterprise SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP 20-0162 Annual Elevator Service Contract WRRF to 1,170.00 Fund 6/30 60 Enterprise SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 08 map scheduled cleaning/CCTV/inspection traffic 2,068.55 Fund control 60 Enterprise SPECIALTY PLASTICS&FAB, INC Elbow&bushing (8 qty) 38.32 Fund 60 Enterprise SPECIALTY PLASTICS&FAB,INC Seal valve&tee(3 qty) 106.17 Fund 60 Enterprise SPF WATER ENGINEERING, LLC 20-0091 Well 9 Replacement Design Test Well B to 646.00 Fund 3/31 60 Enterprise STATEFIRE DC SPECIALTIES, LLC Labor for alarm inspection of WRRF bldgs 1,979.96 Fund 60 Enterprise STATEFIRE DC SPECIALTIES, LLC Labor for annual sprikler testing&inspections in WRRF 705.00 Fund bldg 60 Enterprise SYNCB/AMAZON 436678834855; Explosion proof alarm horn for repairs 400.00 Fund on gas 60 Enterprise SYNCB/AMAZON 788864365336; Marking Applicator Wand for Locating, 87.24 Fund Qty 4 60 Enterprise TELANSWER,INC After Hours Service,4/1-4/30 165.05 Fund 60 Enterprise THOMAS WEBER REFUND WT/S/T: 3107 W KANDICE ST CUSTOMER 54.96 Fund PAID AFTER CLOSING 60 Enterprise UNITED OIL Diesel for plant equipment(1,700 gal) 3,619.30 Fund 60 Enterprise UNITED OIL Oil for 3month initial oil change on A/B mixers(60 qty) 1,695.00 Fund 60 Enterprise UNITED SITE SERVICES INC No PO WRRF Capacity Expansion Porta Potty Contract 121.25 Fund to 3/29 60 Enterprise USA BLUEBOOK Mrkng Pnt,Orng,Reagent Set, Hose Fitting,Qty 4 266.83 Fund 60 Enterprise VWR INTERNATIONAL LLC. Specimen cups(2 cs) 207.49 Fund Date:4/23/20 12:48:13 PM Page:11 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 260 of 272 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment-Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise WESTERN STATES AUTOMATION, LLC Flo-Tite Full Port Ball Valve,Well 24 Prelube, 480.26 Fund WO#291319 60 Enterprise XEROX CORPORATION-PASADENA 8TB570607 b/w(480 city)&color(1,204 city) images 62.60 Fund 60 Enterprise XEROX CORPORATION -PASADENA 8TB576316 b/w(1,723 city)&color(77 city)images 12.47 Fund Total 60 Enterprise 269,366.61 Fund Report Total 1,242,551.95 Date:4/23/20 12:48:13 PM Page:12 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 261 of 272 C-/WE IDIAN-- ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item - 5.A. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 15 Title of Item - Mayor's Office: Growth Areas Discussion Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 262 of 272 gaggg ,jA ILI' W_N 11,Bill MEMO, *la IN W1 SOONER ON L �&Vwpwu , ML 9 N, , m h" nums 14 mmi alls MOM, MITI Id will I Ek n ups, ohn, chi"I 11EIIN I 11g. W KEVIN! MISS III h N 1214 ,kll Ni A ;, - - m L*4,i.16".',',,—I�niq�',.�i'm2 .j%7 W1111s R A W ...N Sell. fto ME IN pill --------7 ------ p owmalm us, iffoil aim I NEW V I IJ m ff"f,Iwo m purn,ma,11�hg i an ml mum JIM, w WE ON, 5 I ggll 1 112 a a g Ow Fill w 0 go Mill -me 6% p at". E, P A- p -------- Sp ...til r,gn fte- iqLlllll�411 IN OWN 4%qj------- -LE—EgRon IN Ali 016"1 L gals 1�1.,IN raw iL a IL 0111—SM/1 :010 W-10010 L K wo "1 2 a 'I -_ 1;"rigi I SUS Well al MICRON 121 ------1.HE I on Lim a , 11;1�illqlil 11-1 1 Ohl w1w,W,a 101 IN, Q 111111 1 0111-1 W, 4 onappoome - Oft I ILI NO SIMON ON goal 01 'We 14 7_4 Mg .1 A, I IIIII IRWIN,- SwIvig NIEMAN. IN MIE A E711 OWN 1 1: i L - 11 1 10 1.,1 IS ILI I Nil IN mb"q IN AIR 10-OEM 11 gi NUNN ,Nor AF 6 ENRON!il L IWO, via 0 L 101 d bill MW "I ISM 0 L .. I BIMINI Me%1, M411M, Wleell via 1_9 41, \4,v IS vi all g Inkfg-1111 me INS 1 No 3,- 31 p.I S, HERE g�w-- 1L -r,4 pag.; a U 7_7411"0116pa,1, 39 1100 Ica Ad q_ 3 MUSEUM IRS SO WO 19"04,11 WIN,W, 91-i -M A I p7may 9 Jim--- WIN M10%,WIN 111 mmigmPoul 90 F th, Mill 011111110111 0 IN q AM j a 11 1-711, all mkq [IN lilt ii, arul V-1h 13 1 XMI Swe mi MN 614,60%iiii 1.11 no OCR 21 EMBOW, R KNIM-1 wX 119 la qI -T­��_ Ai 0111110 - k%, all A :1 1 31111111 Ell me SON "qu Klemm NEW 017176 1% 1 1 " 1,lW "INS 1I 1 111111 101 N N I I OW ­31111i ZEN Ilk, "Ell.EI_ ____ a 11121 all if qH­_ to MEN ISO,1,61, is IS LIM awwwo ORE 114, M—A [a oi- I M .... ..... _k I FORMER '41 1 ION Nil0 oil %Q LEVINE MEMO%, 0 MR. Ilk buip SIMMONS All VA WOR WIN— IRS Oil -.2 jim W 4 10, hill, 3111% No 2. oil 110100 P low A 0011 1 11111110 11 11 11111 __­­ I SO 1 111.1 1 N. A kffl' RINLI! 0 1 1 WIN go- _01741I 11110 1 a No i-11 mq 146;11 711 Re INS -ag 111111 111 1 hill L 111 IN me IIII wk L I'm � L'74 fj g FAfigglim/ pq V m W MISS a Law qu No V 4"14,11 '§7 i_ I ISO S 'I I - 0 all Lino PR ENRON- W, NN ....... ... A Aft n M.w�I MEN �S746i\LN INS ILI ills MINE RA Now L MN lift Mill, IN ­0 f H MISM IR %MEN %was III in 0 MAIN SOME 1101111111111111 1 6, 6001 NEW onlin W IRS FRI IN IN I KI SHOWS ILI 10,01 W, him Wq Wq IL go HIM JIM -7 A j9h '4,0 ,link'NE- I I I AN Ilk Mi WIN I also w r. DNA in IN mille MEN III mIq IRS kLi 111,131111 No ERIC 00 ap I H "M F—A 0,§ OR Rr11"Iniii nVulga 0 !Me pa- 'all 0 MILq a 5 III N11 k, lb 9 kill ILI me- 16 11 LLL I i I I II- I 111110CM All WN wr _J1, kI 01 �cz MLM,BE L BPI I W, Pq I ow ag ggl 'Alshl , `h , _4 Will' L IN 1111111111111114 ff ff LTA ff�_ �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 5.13. Presenter: Caleb Hood Estimated Time for Presentation: 30 minutes Title of Item - Community Development Department: Planning Process Improvement Discussion ATTACHMENTS: A All Descriptio Uploa Process Improvement Memo Cover Memo 4/9/2020 Process Narrative Options and Questions Cover Memo 4/9/2020 Draft UDC Changes Exhibit 4/9/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 263 of 272 Mayor Robert E. Simison E IDIAN.� City Council Members: =�� Treg Bernt Brad Hoagiun Joe Borton Jessica Perreault Luke Caverier Liz Strader April 9, 2020 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Robert Simison City Council Members CC: City Clerk FROM: Caleb Hood, Planning Division Manager RE: Planning Process Improvements Attached are two documents. The first document is a working spreadsheet that outlines some of the process changes discussed. This document has largely been used for Staff to take notes, and ask for direction. The last column represents the most current status of the topic. There are several points of discussion in the last column. These topics are largely broken down into: 1) things Staff can do to improve the process that aren't overly cumbersome; could/should be completed in the next 30 days or so and we plan to move forward with these unless directed otherwise; 2) first round of City Code changes (fairly straight-forward,but there are decision points for you all to make; these are mostly non-controversial but require two public hearings before implementation; adoption anticipated this summer); and 3) more complex and/or potentially controversial code changes that are meant to help the process (these require the UDC Workgroup to convene and discuss before proposing changes for Council adoption; this timeline is TBD, but will probably start later this summer/fall). This document is largely background information,but there are some questions listed in the far-right column that should be discussed during the workshop. The second document contains draft language for UDC/Code changes. The Code changes highlighted yellow in the far left-hand column are the ones proposed for round 1. Please note that not all of these-proposed changes are related to development review/process improvements; Planning has a few other"clean-up" changes, Code Enforcement has some changes they'd like to make as well. We are planning to roll this all into one application and submit in the next couple of weeks. Staff is not planning to run through all draft Code changes, but if there are some non- /process improvement related comments Staff will be,prepared to address them. During the—pril / 16th workshop we will discuss both the draft standards as well as the timelines - if you'd like to Move any of the red highlighted changes (round 2)up to round 1 (or delay any tabbed for round l�until"round Q. Oom`munity Development Department . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102, Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 20�f� rr��itaur�ctdt6lrrR 2�!�+ O�er� ey>i�1 Proposed UDC Text Amendments (Yellow highlights = April 2020 submittal; . = Fall 2020) UDC Section Topic Reason for Change Proposed Change 11-1-11 Code Enforcement Code Enforcement would like to clarify some of the grey 11-1-11: CODE ENFORCEMENT: areas or close loop-holes in various sections of code. A. Duty To Enforce: 1. It shall be the duty of the Community Development Director or designee to interpret this title. (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005; amd. Ord. 12-1514, 5-16-2012, eff. 5-21-2012) 2. It shall be the duty of the Code Enforcement Division of the Police Department to enforce the regulations of this title, as set forth in this section. Code Enforcement Officers may call upon the services of the Planning, Fire, Parks or other appropriate City departments to assist in enforcement. 3. It is the intent of this title to place the obligation of complying with its requirements upon the owner, occupier or other person responsible for the condition of the land and buildings within the scope of this title. (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) B. investigation: 1. The Code Enforcement Officer-shall investigate any str-uetuFe or-use which he 9F she reasonably + 1 with t dlards n.1 ,- t fth' t'tl believes �T-G�1Ti„�TCTr �CCCl CgTITrGT1TGTITJ"�TrC17T.TlT� 2. / afteF investigation, violated, it is deteFmiaed that the standards or-FequiFemeats of this title have been a Code Enforcement OfflceF shall seFve a notice of violation upon the 1 1 action,violated shall state what eoFr-ective if 1 i's y to comply with the f„Fthe,-violation ,ti, „lt in elpiminal P „t;e„ an /oF civil penalties. 3. The Code Enforcement Officer-will Feear-d all e&r-ts made to effeEt service in peFson oF by mail as a. PeFsonal q such / , ; Shown en the last avail-Able a ,,t F011 A-thee- ise I-ERO . R; O e. Posting such notice and order-at . . Lis place an the pr-opeFty and publishing ene netice in the official newspapeF of the City that the pFopeFty has been posted in -ap-p-o-rd—ance with this chapteF and ordering the owner, oe . . I . 'Fson in charge or- control of the property to remedy the violation y the given date. (OFd. 19 1833,-°-19) 4/1/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 265 of 272 11-1-11 Cont. Code Enforcement r Extension Of Compliance Date: 1. The Community Development DiFeeter-or-desip-ee may gFant a reasonable extension of time far- compliance with any notice OF pending eF final, upon finding that subst-anti-al p-Fogr-ess towaFd compliance has been made and that the public will not be adversely affected by-t4e­ extension. Such extension of time Sh-all pet exceed- An,-- hunclFed eighty (180) days-. shown that any of the following are true: (Ord. 05 1170, 8 30 , eff 9 15 2005; 1514, 5T62 0 1 2, eff 5 1 2012) changed,a. The conditions at the time the extension was gFanted have 05 1 1 eff 9_1 5_2041) agreed and so notifies the Community Development Direct-. esipiee, oF (0Fd. 05 1170, 8 3-0-- 5, eff. 9 15-2 5; -,PA d. G)12d 1 7_1 51 4,5 16 2 012, eff. 5zr n r if the t rl eff� t tL. public; czrextensionrC�Cic1 cc�-uii-acr`�'crs� ccc-v-rrcm�"c'rvr'r�. The date of revocation shall then be consideFed as the compliance date. (Ord. 05 1170, 8 30- r eff. Q 1 5_2005) B13. Revocation Of Conditional Use Permit: 1.A conditional use permit may be revoked or modified by the City Council, upon notice and hearing, for breach or violation of any condition of approval or limitation of the permit. 2. If the City Council decides to revoke a conditional use permit, either on its own action or upon complaint to the City Council, the Council shall notify the permit holder of its intention to revoke the permit and provide the permit holder with the opportunity to contest the revocation at a public hearing before the City Council. 3. Fifteen (15) days' prior notice of the hearing shall be given to the permit holder and all property owners within three hundred feet (300') of the boundaries of the land for which the permit was issued. 4. The City Council shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law supporting its decision to revoke the conditional use permit. If the Council does not decide to revoke the permit, no findings of fact and conclusions of law shall be made. 4/1/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020- Page 266 of 272 11-1-11 Cont. Code Enforcement CK Revocation, Modification, Or Denial Of Accessory Use Permit: 1. An accessory use permit may be revoked or modified by the Director upon a finding of breach or violation of any condition of approval or limitation of the permit.An accessory use permit application may be denied by the Director upon a finding that the proposed use cannot or will not be conducted in compliance with applicable specific use standards. The Director shall provide the permit holder written notice of the revocation, modification, or denial, and shall provide the permit holder with information regarding the opportunity to appeal such action. 2. The permit holder or applicant may appeal the Director's revocation, modification, or denial of an accessory use permit. Such appeal shall be made in writing, shall state the reasons for such appeal, and shall be delivered to the City Clerk via U.S. mail or in person within fourteen (14) days of such revocation, modification, or denial. Upon receipt of such written appeal, the City Clerk shall schedule a public hearing on the appeal at a City Council meeting within thirty (30) days. The Clerk shall provide fifteen (15) days' notice of the hearing to the permit holder or applicant and all property owners within three hundred feet (300') of the boundaries of the land for which the permit was issued. 3. Following public hearing on the appeal, City Council shall affirm, modify, or reverse the Director's action and shall issue written findings supporting such decision. The City Council's decision on such appeal shall be a final decision. (Ord. 18-1762, 1-23-2018) 11-1-12 Penalities Code Enforcement would like to clarify some of the grey 11-1-12: PENALTIES: areas or close loop-holes in various sections of code. A. eemply with any of the If this tifle shall be subjeet to criminal pFeseeutien and up a teFm not exceeding six (6) month-s A-1-P be h-e-th fined- _ABd_ iMpFiSened. Each Elay of noncompliance with any of the „ if this title shall Nstitute ^ sepaFate offense.A violation of, or failure to comply with, any provision of this title shall be unlawful.Any person violating or failing to comply with any of the provisions of this title shall be subject to the following12enalties: 1.A first conviction of a violation or failure to comply with a provision of this title shall be an infraction .punishable by a fine of twenty-five dollars ($25.00). 2.A second conviction,within a period of five (5) years, of a violation or failure to comply with a provision of this title shall be an infraction punishable by a fine of fifty dollars ($50.00). 3.A third or subsequent conviction,within a period of five (5) years, of a violation of or failure to comply with a provision of this title shall be a misdemeanor. 4. The failure to pay a fine for an infraction penalty assessed pursuant to this section shall be a misdemeanor. Each day of noncompliance with any of the provisions of this title shall constitute a separate offense. 4/1/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 267 of 272 Allowed use table in Medical centers are identified in the M-E zone but commercial districts hospitals are a prohibited use in the table. Use [CN [C-c C-G L-0 M-E FHE Hospital' FTFC- C C Bikeways ACHD has a master plan specific to bikeways that supplements the Master Street Map. "Bikeways shall be constructed in accord with the city's comprehensive plan and the Ada County highway district master street map and Roadways to Bikeways Master Plan." Irrigation easements Surrounding property owners don't need to be noticed as the easement on the building lot(s) doesn't affect Easements: In Residential Districts, irrigation easements wider than ten feet (10') shall be included in a them - a Council waiver is sufficient common lot that is a minimum of twenty feet (20') wide and outside of a fenced area, unless mid otherwise waived by City Council at^ public hearing with Notice to surrounding rNapeFty awaeFs Pedestrian walkways The current provision seems to require an unobstructed Unobstructed walkways at least five feet (5') in width shall be provided for any aisle length that is greater walkway for every aisle length greater than 150' parking than one hundred fifty (150) parking spaces or two hundred feet (200') away from the primary building spaces or 200' away from the entrance -we haven't been requiring that (i.e. grocery stores) entrance(s). Location of fences/walls 11-31-1-41) requires a berm or berm/wall combination fo on interior edge of noise abatement for residential and other noise sensitive "Except where fences and walls are used as decorative landscape elements or as noise abatement, fences street buffers uses adjoining state highways. and walls are permitted only on the interior edge of the street buffer." 11-4-3-9A4 Background checks We rely on the State to enforce background checks but the State does not require them for facilities watching The applicant or owner shall provide proof of criminal background checks and fire inspection certificates less than six kids. as required by title 39, chapter 11, Idaho Code. Said proof shall be provided prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. The applicant or owner shall comply with all State of Idaho and Department of Health and Welfare requirements for daycare facilities. Where title 39, chapter 11. Idaho Code does not apply to facilities watching less than six children the applicant or owner shall provide such proof to the City of Meridian Police and Fire Departments. 11-4-3-38 Specific use name Consistency with use name in Allowed Use tables 11-4-3-38: Vehicle Sales or Rental and Service: change -11111110- Density formula The UDC no longer has a maximum number of units Density FaFmula: Residential density in a planned development shall be calculated by multiplying the net associated with zoning should we remove residential area (gross aeFeage less the aFea of nonresidential uses) by the umbeF of dwelling units PQ12 Ae tQ-a ewed fAlp t 3c tipict in rite--thp---- --i- is located. Lattice or guyed We have considered a lattice structure to fall into the Lattice or guyed designed structures are prohibited unless approved through the conditional use process. designed structures category of"other wireless communication facilities that do not meet the standards set forth in this section shall Or should we only allow them if they're over a certain height for structure stability purposes? require conditional use approval in 11-4-3-43C.10" although 11-4-3-43C.8 specifically prohibits these type of structures. (i.e.Ada County Dispatch Center CUP-14- 018;Day Wireless CUP H-2019-0115) Wireless Federal laws have changed how cities and counties can Communications (small regulate wireless communications facilities. Ted Baird cells and micro cells) has been working on changes. 4/1/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 268 of 272 11-513 CPAM Amendments With adoption of a new Comprehensive Plan, limit the The city council shall not consider amendments to the land use map of the adopted comprehensive plan frequency to which it can be amended. Make it clear that more than twice per calendar year. The application deadlines for amendments to the land use map Map amendments will be processed no more than every component of the comprehensive plan shall be June 15 and December 15 of every year. 6 months - cut-offs. TBD - UDC or Knox box need for PD Police needs entry into secure condo projects. elsewhere (Bldg Code???) 11-SA-6D2a Council review of Instead of 4'x 4'which seems to be overkill, require 11 x daycares - posting 17 for daycare appeals. a. Conditional use permit applications for daycare, group: city council review of daycare, family; and requirements annexation, preliminary plat,variance, rezone, and comprehensive plan amendment applications for properties of land less than three (3) acres in size: The applicant shall post a sign consisting of one 11- inch by 17-inch piece of paper mounted to a rigid surface of at least equal size, or other material stating the name of the applicant, a statement concerning the proposed development, and the date, time and location of the public hearing. 11-5A-6C Invite property owners The public wants to be involved earlier in the project C. Neighborhood Meetings: from further away to development process so their voice can be better neighborhood meetings considered in design, particularly for residential 1.Applicants for applications requiring a public hearing are required to hold a neighborhood meeting to &hold the meeting no projects. Five days does not really provide much closer than 10 days opportunity for an applicant to consider feedback from provide an opportunity for public review of the proposed project prior to the submittal of an before submittal the neighbors to potentially incorporate into their plans application, except a neighborhood meeting is not required for city council review, a vacation, and/or before submittal. short plat. 2. Notice of the neighborhood meeting shall be provided to all property owners of record within three hundred five hundred feet (350W) of the exterior boundary of the application property. Notice of the meeting shall be either hand delivered or mailed to the recipients. 3. Notice of the meeting shall be provided at least five (5) days prior to the meeting. The meeting shall be held not more than three (3) months or less than 4ve ten (-�10) days prior to the submittal of an application. 4/1/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 269 of 272 11- City takes over posting There have been complaints that properties are not D. Posting Of Public Hearing Notice: of 4'x 4' signs and being posted in a quality and timely manner. The City ensures they are affixed should contract out the posting requirements to lessen 1. Required: All applicants ^r applications requiring a public hearing shall be posted on the subject to ground the amount of continuations. property, except posting is not required for a unified development code text amendment, Could work with comprehensive plan text amendment, vacation, comprehensive plan map amendment initiated by the Finance to do RFQ/P city, and/or short plat. and contract out so this could be done in round 2. Time Frame: Not less than ten (10) days prior to the hearing, the appli ma*tc�shall post a copy of the 1 of UDC changes??? public hearing notice of the application on the property under consideration. Except as noted herein, Would need help from Purchasing if this is a posting of the property must be in substantial compliance with the following requirements: priority to do in round 1. Thoughts? Preference (Keep Exhibit) on priority? 3. Sign Placement: The signs shall be posted securely on the land being considered along each roadway that is adjacent to the subject property boundaries. The sign(s) shall be located on the property, outside of the public right of way. If the sign cannot be placed on the property and still be clearly visible,the sign may be placed within the right of way if the applicant can obta consent of the owner of the right of way can be obtained. In circumstances where placing signs per the standards listed herein is not practical the applicant may Fequest^ director's determination to may identify an alternative sign placement strategy. 4. Proof Of Posting: The applicant shall s„ba+ ^A notarized statement, map depicting the location(s) of the sins and a photograph of the posting shall be provided to the city no later than seven (7) days prior to the public hearing attesting to where and when the sign(s) were posted. Unless certificate is received by such date, the hearing will be continued. 5. Sign Removal: The signs shall be removed no later than three (3) days after the public hearing for which the sign had been posted is ended. 4/1/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 270 of 272 11-SA-6E Similar to 11-SA-6C E. Mailing And Publishing Of The Public Hearing Notice: 1. Legal Notice: At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, the city shall publish a notice of the time and place and a summary of the application in the official newspaper of general circulation in Ada County. 2. Radius Notice: a. Time Of Notice: At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, the city shall send a notice by first class mail of the time and place, and a summary of the application to property owners or purchasers of record (as listed in the current records of the Ada County assessor) owning property within thFee hundred five hundred feet (3500') of the property being considered. b. Notice Extended: The noticing shall be extended to property owners within one thousand five hundred feet (1,8500') of the external property boundaries for heavy industries and wireless communication facilities. c. Notice To Properties Farther From External Boundaries: The director may determine, or other applications provided for in this title may require, that notices be sent to property owners or purchasers of record whose properties are farther than th-pee -,,,,,a,.ea foot (300') e thA,,S-a„a foot (1,0044 from the external boundaries of the property than those listed herein. 11-SA-6H Receiving Public The City is receiving a lot of information, from the public,H. Standards For Written Testimony: Written testimony submitted for inclusion in the record of an (NEW Testimony applicant and other agencies, late in the process. To public hearing shall comply with the following standards: SECTION) ensure all testimony is received in a timely manner to be considered by the decision making body, a deadline for submittal is needed. 1. Written testimony must be submitted to the city clerk no less than five 5 days prior to the day on which the public hearing is scheduled. 2. Written testimony shall include contact information of the submitter, including name and physical address. 3. If written testimony fails to comply with the aforementioned standards the decision making body may declare such testimony inadmissible. 4/1/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 271 of 272 11-M Increase OT height Require more than 2-stories; (50') minimum for The standards for development in the Old Town District are set forth in this section as follows: minimum and properties zoned OT. maximum A. Building Height: Maximum building height is seventy five one hundred feet (7S100'). Minimum r,,, -h-er of Steriesbuilding height for new construction is two (24fifty feet tO3 and/or as set forth in the "City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual". C.Additional Height: Proposed building height exceeding the maximum or below the minimum height alle requires approval through a conditional use permit. These provision do not aRply to single-family homes. 11-6C-3B.4 Subdivision street To clear up the intent of restricting dead-end street lengths lengths to 500'. B. Streets: 4. Gul De Saes. Dead end streets: a. No streets or series of streets that ends in a cul-de-sac or a dead end shall be longer than five hundred feet (500') except as allowed in subsection b of this section. b. The City Council may approve a dead end street up to seven hundred fifty feet (750') in length where an emergency access is proposed: or where there is a physical barrier such as a steep slope, railroad tracks, or a large waterway that prevents extension; and where a pedestrian connection is provided from the street to an adjacent existing or planned pedestrian facility. c. Cul-de-sac streets may serve a maximum of thirty (30) dwelling units. d. The length of a cul-de-sac street shall be measured from the near edge of the right of way to the center of the turnaround. 4/1/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 272 of 272 Charlene Way From:Chris Johnson Sent:Monday, May 04, 2020 8:52 AM To:Charlene Way Subject:FW: In Reference to Work Session Discussion Tuesday April 28, 2020: Staff Reports, Public Testimonies, addtitional suggestion for the continuation of the Zoom and Real-time remote testimonies and Comments Can you create a folder in Potential Hearings for Potential Code Changes? Caleb will be bringing an application forward. This is related to that application. Thank you. From: Robert Simison <rsimison@meridiancity.org> Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 8:39 AM To: Mike and Malissa Bernard <MMBERNARD1@msn.com>; Liz Strader <lstrader@meridiancity.org>; Joe Borton <jborton@meridiancity.org>; Brad Hoaglun <bhoaglun@meridiancity.org>; Treg Bernt <tbernt@meridiancity.org>; Jessica Perreault <jperreault@meridiancity.org>; Luke Cavener <lcavener@meridiancity.org> Cc: Caleb Hood <chood@meridiancity.org>; Michelle Albertson <malbertson@meridiancity.org>; Ken Clifford <kenclifford@q.com>; Frank Marcos <alpinepointenwp@gmail.com>; Paul Miller <pdmdiving@gmail.com>; Sandi King <ssking72@live.com>; Sherry Garey <sgarey@cableone.net>; 'lauratrairatnobhas@hotmail.com' <lauratrairatnobhas@hotmail.com>; Chris Johnson <cjohnson@meridiancity.org> Subject: RE: In Reference to Work Session Discussion Tuesday April 28, 2020: Staff Reports, Public Testimonies, addtitional suggestion for the continuation of the Zoom and Real-time remote testimonies and Comments Malissa, Thank you for sharing your comments regarding these items. I will let Mr. Hood respond in more detail if appropriate as he is preparing the items for consideration which may include future public hearings. Respectfully, Mayor Robert Simison City of Meridian All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in regards to both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law. From: Mike and Malissa Bernard <MMBERNARD1@msn.com> Sent: Friday, May 01, 2020 9:25 AM To: Robert Simison <rsimison@meridiancity.org>; Liz Strader <lstrader@meridiancity.org>; Joe Borton <jborton@meridiancity.org>; Brad Hoaglun <bhoaglun@meridiancity.org>; Treg Bernt <tbernt@meridiancity.org>; Jessica Perreault <jperreault@meridiancity.org>; Luke Cavener <lcavener@meridiancity.org> Cc: Caleb Hood <chood@meridiancity.org>; Michelle Albertson <malbertson@meridiancity.org>; Mike and Malissa Bernard <mmbernard1@msn.com>; Ken Clifford <kenclifford@q.com>; Frank Marcos <alpinepointenwp@gmail.com>; Paul Miller <pdmdiving@gmail.com>; Sandi King <ssking72@live.com>; Sherry Garey <sgarey@cableone.net>; 'lauratrairatnobhas@hotmail.com' <lauratrairatnobhas@hotmail.com> Subject: In Reference to Work Session Discussion Tuesday April 28, 2020: Staff Reports, Public Testimonies, addtitional suggestion for the continuation of the Zoom and Real-time remote testimonies and Comments 1 Dear Mayor and City of Meridian Councilmembers, I happened to catch several minutes of your discussion in your work session on Tuesday, April 28, 2020, and something caught my ear about the submission of public testimonies, particularly about deadlines that may be imposed via City ordinance. Oftentimes, the applicant will submit new testimony far past the suggested 72-hours found in the City general guidelines provided online, and right up to the last minute. Yet there was discussion that the public (the people whom have elected you in good faith and in confidence that you will think of them in your decisions) should have a set 3 days or Friday afternoon cut-off for a Tuesday meeting for submission of testimonies. I feel you should accept any and all testimony, though you may suggest a 24-hour submission cut-off for consideration and attention by Commissioners and/or Councilmembers, yet be open to reception of testimonies at all times. Many times the Staff Report comes out just a couple of days before the hearings and agendas, and these Staff Reports are rather lengthy and take some time for analysis by yourselves and by the public, or the ACHD addendum email for the record comes forth, or some other important piece for the Agenda Packet. An example: PZ – Staff Recommendation for 3-19, for P and Z Hearing on March 19, 2020, 48 pages in length, submitted for the Public Record for your citizens to view 3/17/2020 at 12:59 PM. The Staff commentary resulted in approximately 28 pieces of written testimony to be submitted in response to the Staff Report by concerned citizens of a neighborhood by the time of the hearing. What other mode would you like the public to respond within such a tight time frame from the Staff Report’s submission? Moreover, this letter writing was carried out in response to recent COVID-19 parameters, and due to stringent social distancing we could not attend the hearing en masse to address our commissioners in a public hearing--which is our legal right to do so--to be heard. Most of the PZ – Packet items were not submitted until 3/16/2020 and 3/17/2020, hardly enough time for a citizen to weigh in on new information. To reiterate: in many packets for the Council or P and Z Commission, the applicant continues to submit correspondence and responses to reports up until the meeting or hearing. Consider all of these modes and occurrences via the point of view of the citizens of Meridian. By the time any application, ordinance, code changes, etc. comes to the City Council, this is a quasi-judicial process for binding legal decision. Let’s say a citizen finds new evidence or has an idea after seeing the Agenda Packet in its entirety or by fact- checking the applicant testimony or Staff Report’s supportive City Code--this citizen may not have the time or health to attend a four or five hour City Council meeting in person, and that citizen should have the option to write to their elected officials, and in fact it is their legal right to do so. Please consider keeping a Zoom format or remote attendance mode for our citizens of Meridian that may want to participate in the public hearing process, and may not be in town, or they might not have the health or stamina to attend a lengthy meeting. Citizens of Meridian should be able to say they want to testify via Phone, Virtual software…their choice. In either mode, they should have their computer ready and/or be near a phone for the Clerk to call or text to give them a five-minute warning for their testimony window. It is stated that written testimony is to hold the same weight as publicly-averred testimonies, and I would like to believe this is true and you will weigh every piece carefully, for your citizens are relying upon you to do so. As citizens, we should have the right and modes to contact our public officials: our Mayor; our Councilmembers; our Commissioners. We are trusting you to consider the citizen in all matters. Built for business is geared for the applicant, designed for living our best lives is for our Meridian citizens. Thank you. 2 Be well, and stay safe! Malissa Bernard 4025 N Dashwood Pl Meridian ID 83646 mmbernard1@msn.com Home: 208.362.3295 Cell: 208.599.3058 3