Loading...
2020-04-21 Regular IIN�� CITY COUNCIL REGULAR r� H MEETING AGENDA meridiancity.org/live meridiancity.org/virtualmeeting Tuesday,April 21, 2020 at 6:00 PM Start time 6:04 p.m. 1. Roll-Call Attendance X Liz Strader X Joe Borton X Brad Hoaglun X Treg Bernt X Jessica Perreault X Luke Cavener X Mayor Robert E. Simison 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Community Invocation with Mark Bryan of Harvest Church 4. Adoption of Agenda - Adopted as amended 5. Action Items Public Hearings for Land Use Applications follow this process: Once the Public Hearing is opened, City staff will present their report. Following the report, the applicant is allowed up to 15 minutes to present their application. Members of the public are allowed up to 3 minutes each to address council regarding the application. If a person is representing a large group such as a Homeowner's Association, indicated by a show of hands, they may be allowed up to 10 minutes. Following all public testimony, the applicant is then allowed 10 additional minutes to respond to comments. Once the public hearing is closed, no additional testimony will be received. The City Council may move to continue the item for additional information or vote to approve or deny the item with or without changes as presented. The Mayor is not a member of the City Council and pursuant to Idaho Code does not vote on public hearing items, unless to break a tie vote. A Public Hearing: Proposed 2020 Summer Fee Schedule Updates of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department B. Resolution No. 20-2198: A Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Meridian Adopting the Summer 2020 Fee Schedule Updates of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department; Authorizing the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department to Collect Such Fees; and Providing an Effective Date - Approved C. Request for Reconsideration for Frazier Council Review(H-2020- 0011) by Elisabeth Songe,Appellant(Represented by Jim Jones) - New Public Hearing Scheduled for May 19, 2020 D. Public Hearing for Lupine Cove (H-2019-0133) by Penelope Constantikes, Riley Planning Services, Located at4000 N. McDermott Rd. - Continued to April 28, 2020 1. Request: Annexation of 7.09 acres of land with an R-8 zoning district; and, 2. Request: Preliminary plat consisting of 28 building lots, 7 common lots and 2 other (common driveway) lots on 7 acres of land in the R- 8 zoning district. E. Public Hearing for Hill's Century Farm North (H-2019-0134) by Martin L. Hill, Hill &Hill Properties, Located at the Southeast Corner of S. Eagle Rd. and E.Amity Rd. - Approved 1. Request: Rezone of a total of 39.9 acres of land from the R-8 zoning district to the C-N (4.9 acres), C-C (4.35 acres), and R-15 (30.65 acres)zoning districts; 2. Request: Preliminary plat consisting off 147 building lots, and 18 common lots and 10 ether lots on 43.02 acres of land in the R-8, R-15, C-N and C-C zoning districts; 3. Request: Planned unit development for an age-restricted 55 and older gated community with deviations from certain development standards; and, 4. Request: Conditional use permit for a 73,730 square foot 443-unit self-service storage facility on 3.89 acres of land in the C-C zoning district. 6. Future Meeting Topics 7. Amended Onto Agenda: Executive Session per Idaho Code 74-206(d): To consider records that are exempt from disclosure as provided in chapter 1, title 74, Idaho Code. Into Executive Session at 7:32 p.m. Out of Executive Session at 8:04 p.m. Meeting Adjourned at 8:04 p.m. Meridian City Council April 21, 2020. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:04 p.m., Tuesday, April 21, 2020, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Joe Borton, Luke Cavener, Treg Bernt, Jessica Perreault, Brad Hoaglun and Liz Strader. Also present: Chris Johnson, Adrienne Weatherly, Bill Nary, Caleb Hood, Sonya Allen and Joe Bongiorno. Item 1: Roll-call Attendance: Liz Strader _X_ Joe Borton _X_ Brad Hoaglun _X_Treg Bernt X Jessica Perreault _X Luke Cavener _X_ Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: With that I will call the next meeting into order. For the record is Tuesday, April 21, 2020, and the time is 6:02 p.m. We will begin this meeting with roll call attendance. Johnson: Mr. Mayor, before roll call we have a technical issue we are trying to work out. I'm curious if you could pause for one moment. Simison: Then I guess we will pause for one moment. Johnson: And we will be right back with -- Mr. Mayor, we are still working on something in the background for one of our planning staff, but we should be good to proceed while they work on that. Simison: Okay. Well, with that I will ask the clerk -- I will bring us back in. Tuesday, April 21 st, 2020. The time is 6:04 p.m. Ask the clerk to call the roll. Item 2: Pledge of Allegiance Simison: Item No. 2 is the Pledge of Allegiance. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) Item 3: Community Invocation with Mark Bryan of Harvest Church Simison: Item 3. 1 just want to confirm, Chris. Do we know -- do we not have Pastor Bryan with us? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, that is correct. I did not get confirmation. I do not see him on the call. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 117 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 2 of 30 Item 4: Adoption of Agenda Simison: Okay. Then we will go on to Item 4, adoption of the agenda. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: Item D has requested to continue to April 28. When we get to there we will -- we will talk more about it, but other than that I move that we adopt the agenda as amended. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, before I second, do we want to add the Executive Session on at the end of the meeting? And, Bill, what -- what letter was that particular section that we need to add? Nary: 74-206(1)(d). Hoaglun: (d). Simison: All right. Does the maker of the motion agree to amend his motion to include that item and I have a second? Hoaglun: I second. Simison: Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed no. The ayes have it. The agenda is adopted. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Item 5: Action Items A. Public Hearing: Proposed 2020 summer Fee Schedule Updates of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department. Simison: We will move into Item 5-A, a public hearing on the proposed 2020 summer fee schedule for Parks and I will turn this over to Garrett White. White: All right. Mr. Mayor, Members of Council, thanks for having me again tonight. Before you are the remaining four summer 2020 program fees. Like I mentioned last week, these fees are listed for the contractor -- or for the instructor per our contract. With that I will stand for questions. Simison: Council, any questions for Garrett? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 118 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 3 of 30 Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Garrett, I apologize, I don't mean to put you on the spot. I meant to call you about this today. That -- that Exhibit A that's in our documents, there is nothing there and so I don't know if that was just a -- if there was a piece in the exhibit that we were supposed to review before approval or if it just was inadvertently added. White: Let me look. I don't think -- Cavener: I have never seen anything like that and so it struck me as it was probably just inadvertently added, but I just -- I wanted to make sure before -- White: It looks like -- Councilman Cavener, that looks like it was just inadvertently added. It's really just those four, which is all in the one contract in the first. Cavener: Yeah. White: Yeah. Good question. Cavener: Thanks, Garrett. Simison: Council, do you have any further questions for Garrett? If not we will move on to Item 6 -- 5-13, Resolution No. 20-2198. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Should I go ahead and close the public hearing on Item 5-A? Simison: Yes. Hoaglun: I move that we close the public hearing on Item 5-A, the proposed 2020 summer fee schedule updates for the Parks and Recreation Department. Cavener: Second. Bernt: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing on the proposed 2020 summer fee schedule updates. Any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 119 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 4 of 30 B. Resolution No. 20-2198: A Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Meridian Adopting the Summer 2020 Fee Schedule Updates of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department; Authorizing the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department to Collect Such Fees; and Providing an Effective Date Simison: Item 5-B. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I move approval of Resolution No. 20-2198, the summer of 2020 fee schedule for Meridian Parks and Recreation Department. Cavener: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve Resolution No. 20-2198. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, clerk will call the roll. Roll call: Bernt, yea; Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, yea; Perreault, yea. Simison: All ayes. The resolution is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. C. Request for Reconsideration for Frazier Council Review (1-11- 2020-0011) by Elisabeth Songe, Appellant (Represented by Jim Jones) Simison: Item 5-C, request for a reconsideration for Frazier Council review, H-2020- 0011. I'm going to turn this over to Mr. Nary. Nary: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. You have before you a request for reconsideration under our city code. Mr. Jones is counsel for the -- for the requester in this case is Ms. Songe. I think there is a Jenny Hay on the line. I think she's assisting Ms. Songe this evening. As I -- as I have mentioned to you prior and I have also mentioned to Mr. Jones, there is no testimony at this stage. Your decision point is based on the -- on the written materials that you have in your packet from Mr. Jones and your decision point is either to affirm the decision you made on March 24th, which was to revoke the accessory use permit -- just to make it clear for the record, the basis of that revocation on the 24th was the belief based on the information that was provided by the appellant that night, Mr. Frazier, that the process was not properly followed by Ms. Songe. That has now been refuted by her counsel and Ms. Songe's assistant, and so you can either affirm your decision, reverse your decision, modify your decision or set it for a new Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 120 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 5 of 30 hearing, which we will, then, notice all -- all parties and, then, have another public hearing where all parties can present their evidence in relation to the --the request that was made. So, one of four choices is your decision, Council. Simison: Thank you, Bill. Council, any questions for Mr. Nary at this point in time? Hoaglun: Mr. Nary? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Mr. Nary, it -- it has to go through the whole process, the time frame of noticing and everything else. There is no way to expedite if we want to hear -- have a new public hearing; correct? Nary: That is correct. It will take at least ten days, so it would be probably two weeks. So, that would be May 5th would be the earliest we could hold a hearing. And I see Mr. Jones is on the line and as I said there is no testimony. If the Council needs any clarification, again, it's just a clarifying question, not testimonial, certainly Mr. Jones can answer that if you have any, but, again, if it's a hearing you would prefer, an opportunity for both parties to present whatever evidence they have, besides what you already have in written form, that would be your way to do that. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: There are some -- there are some -- what I feel are sort of gaps in information, some questions that I have about what transpired that I would like to have answered from the applicant. So, I am in favor of having a new public hearing -- or a second public hearing. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Just to provide a -- maybe an opposing view, I am not in favor of having an additional hearing on this. It sounded to me like the city and the clerk followed our agreed upon process to provide Ms. Songe with adequate notice to appear before us and she did not and I don't like the idea of creating a precedent that we are going to have people not show up for meetings as requested and, then, review them. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 121 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 6 of 30 Hoaglun: Yeah. Council Woman Strader touches on -- on important factors there. I'm curious. A question to Mr. Nary. The request for reconsideration does lay out some things about whether or not Mr. Frazier's appeal was tardy and it's based on if they are considered to be a party of record. Is that something we can weigh in now or is that something that has to be established at another hearing? Nary: Thank you. Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Hoaglun, again, that would probably have to be done in a hearing, because we can't provide testimony tonight. I think the dispute before you from the written materials for Mr. Jones -- the Council's decision was based upon the process not being followed, based upon the appellant Mr. Frazier's statements in the hearing. Ms. Songe presence wasn't required, so her lack of being there itself isn't an issue. The dispute now did she follow the process and his written materials says that she did. So, there is a dispute of fact between the code, her performance in following the process and Mr. Frazier's in the appeal and so there are some -- some issues that, unfortunately, we can't resolve tonight, we would have to have a hearing to do that. Hoaglun: Well, Mr. Mayor and Council Members, I'm of the mind like Council Woman Perreault, I think in a matter of fairness to make some determine --factual determinations of some of the things that were set out, I think it would be a matter of rehearing this -- this issue for -- to -- to make -- to make a better determination, if you will. I don't want to set a precedent here. I think Council Woman Strader is correct in that, but at the same time I'm uncomfortable making a final decision at this point in time with -- with these facts that are before us tonight that we would have to weigh more thoroughly. So, with that I would move that we have a new public hearing scheduled -- I will take May 5th to have a reconsideration of the Songe daycare facility. Simison: I have a motion. Do I have a second? Perreault: Second. Simison: Okay. I have a motion and a second. Is there discussion on the motion? Cavener: Mr. Nary? Nary: Yes, sir. Cavener: Thank you. Mr. Mayor, Mr. Nary. Just for clarification, is there any concern on your part that the city didn't follow our process correctly? Nary: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Cavener, no, I don't think the city -- the city had any error in our process. I think the question of fact is simply was the process followed initially by Ms. Songe. Cavener: Thank you. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 122 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 7 of 30 Simison: Any further discussion on the motion? Bernt: Is May 5th -- Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: Is May 5th an appropriate date for parties involved and for -- I don't -- I don't have an agenda in front of me, I would have to go look through my e-mails to find it. Just want to make sure that May 5th is an adequate and appropriate date. Weatherly: Mr. Mayor and Council Members, this is Adrienne. I just -- I -- if it requires a public hearing -- and, Mr. Nary, if you could comment on this. If it requires re-noticing in the newspaper, the earliest date available would be May 19th. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Maybe -- I know we hate substitute motions, but before I would maybe make one, a question for Mr. Nary is if we could continue this out further -- or continue it to next week to set a date, I think Council Member Bernt asked an appropriate question. The whole reason why we are back here tonight is because one of the parties didn't realize they had to be here. I don't know if I would be comfortable with us setting a date without us at least verifying from the parties that would be involved that they would be able to be in attendance. I just don't know from a process standpoint how we could explore that. I don't know if -- if Mr. Frazier is on the call. Obviously, Mr. Jones is. I would -- I would want to seek some insight from both of those parties before we set a date. Nary: So, Mr. Mayor, I can answer Adrienne's question. I'm looking -- I was looking up the code real quick. It does say all noticing. So, she's correct. We would have to go to the newspaper, as well as a sign. So, we are going to require some legwork on our part to get a sign posted, as well as a newspaper noticing. So, you probably are going to be -- at least to May 19th. Simison: I see Mr. Frazier is on the -- is nearby. I don't want to necessarily open this up for conversation that we shouldn't under your direction, Mr. Nary, but I don't know if that -- if we put out that the May 19th information -- if we could somehow get confirmation through the chat function for Mr. Frazier and Mr. Jones and see if -- and if so get that information now, so Council could make a determination on the motion or a substitute that's coming. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 123 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 8 of 30 Bernt: One way that we could resolve that is to set the date for May 19th and, then, have the attendees -- or just say we are thinking about the 19th and, then, have the attendees raise their hand if they are in agreement. There is the raise your hand option at the bottom of the participant box where you can raise your hand in agreement. Nary: Mr. Mayor, I don't have a concern if all we are asking them is would that be an available date for them and we are not asking for any other testimonial type of information from them. Simison: Okay. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Is this -- Mr. Nary, is this going to require the applicant to fund the additional cost of a newspaper publication and mailers? Nary: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Perreault, no. The city's going to have to pay for that. Perreault: Okay. Hoaglun: So, Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: With Consent to the second, I would withdraw my original -- original motion and move that we approve a request for reconsideration for Frazier Council review, H-2020- 0011, and set that for May 19th. That hearing for May 19th. Perreault: Second. Simison: So, I have got a revision with a first and a second. Do we have confirmation from the two attendees by raise of hand or other function that that day appears to work or do we just move forward without it? Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, I think we just move forward. Simison: Okay. Is there any discussion on the motion? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, before discussion -- I apologize. This is Chris. We do have a raised hand from Mr. Frazier and Mr. Jones is on the line as well and does have the ability to speak if he chooses to confirm that. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 124 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 9 of 30 Simison: Well, you're in charge of -- I can't ask anyone to do anything, so if you want to get a verbal yes from the two of them go for it. Jones: It works for me. Johnson: That was Mr. Jones? Jones: Yes. Uh-huh. Johnson: And that works for Mr. Frazier as well. Simison: Okay. Then with that do I have any further discussion on the motion? If not -- Strider: Yeah. I -- I just want to say I think if -- if our process or the time that we require people to respond to something and appear before us is something that we need to look at, I think we should look at that, but to me it is a separate issue. If we followed our process and someone didn't appear, I don't think we should be considering these. I think -- I'm a big believer in processes and that's why I will be a no vote. Simison: Okay. Any further conversation on the motion -- or comments, questions on the motion? If not, I will ask the clerk to call the roll. Roll call: Bernt, yea; Borton, abstain; Cavener, nay; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, nay; Perreault, yea. Simison: Motion passes. Three to two. MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. TWO NAYS. ONE ABSTAIN. D. Public Hearing for Lupine Cove (H-2019-0133) by Penelope Constantikes, Riley Planning Services, Located at 4000 N. McDermott Rd. 1. Request: Annexation of 7.09 acres of land with an R-8 zoning district; and, 2. Request: Preliminary plat consisting of 28 building lots, 7 common lots and 2 other (common driveway) lots on 7 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district. Simison: Thank you, everybody. Item 5-D has been requested to continue to April 28th. But we will start off by opening Item 5-D, public hearing for Lupine Cove, H-2019-0133. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 125 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 10 of 30 Bernt: I move that we -- we continue this -- this public hearing for H-2019-0133 to April 28th, 2020, with the reason that the applicant failed to post the sign. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second that we continue this item to April 28th, 2020. Is there discussion on the motion? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: To make clarification, are we renoticing, then, everything appropriately, sign, public notice, newspaper, etcetera? Simison: Can I defer to Mr. Nary on this one. Nary: Mr. Mayor, I believe all the noticing was -- except for the signage was done for today, so the signage has now been corrected for next week, so that has been done and -- and Ms. Riley has filed an affidavit to that effect. So, we are okay to move it a week. Cavener: Okay. Simison: Any further discussion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed no. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. E. Public Hearing for Hill's Century Farm North (H-2019-0134) by Martin L. Hill, Hill & Hill Properties, Located at the Southeast Corner of S. Eagle Rd. and E. Amity Rd. 1. Request: Rezone of a total of 39.9 acres of land from the R- 8 zoning district to the C-N (4.9 acres), C-C (4.35 acres), and R-15 (30.65 acres) zoning districts; 2. Request: Preliminary plat consisting of 137 147 building lots, and 18 common lots and 10 other lots on 43.02 acres of land in the R-8, R-15, C-N and C-C zoning districts; Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 126 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 11 of 30 3. Request: Planned unit development for an age-restricted 55 and older gated community with deviations from certain development standards; and, 4. Request: Conditional use permit for a 73,730 square foot 443-unit self-service storage facility on 3.89 acres of land in the C-C zoning district. Simison: Item 5-E is a public hearing for Hill Century Farm North, H-2019-0134. I will open this public hearing with staff comments. Bernt: Mr. Mayor, before we start. Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: As in other public hearings in the past, I have always made it known that Brighton Corporation is one of my customers. To make it also known, I'm not their exclusive flooring customer. They do this with other folks as well. There is a --there is a bid process involved and since I have been on Council I have won some and I have lost some and some I have not even been involved with the bid process at all. So, I personally feel confident, having a clear mind and without any bias, in participating in this conversation this evening, but I wanted to throw that out to my fellow Council Members to get their thoughts as well. Simison: Thank you. Council, any concerns with Councilman Bernt participating in this public hearing? Great. Thank you. We will turn this over to staff. Sonya. Allen: Sorry about that, Mr. Mayor and Council. Can you hear me now? Okay. The applications before you tonight are a request for a development agreement modification, a rezone, a preliminary plat, a planned unit development and a conditional use permit. There were also applications for a private street and alternative compliance that have been approved by the director. This site consists of 43 acres of land. It's zoned R-8 and C-N and it's located off of the southeast corner of East Amity Road and South Eagle Road. This project was annexed back in 2015 with the requirement of a development agreement. Two subsequent amendments have been approved to the development agreement. The Comprehensive Plan future land use map designation is mixed use neighborhood. The applicant is requesting a modification to the existing development agreement for Hill Century Farm Commercial to update the concept development plan and certain provisions of the agreement to allow for the development of a self service storage facility and retail professional office uses where medium density single family residential uses are currently approved, consistent with the mixed use neighborhood future land use designation. A rezone is requested of a total of 39.9 acres of land with the R-8 zoning district to the C-N district, which is 4.9 acres, to the C-C district, which is 4.35 acres and the R-15, which is 30.65 acres consistent with the mixed use neighborhood designation. A preliminary plat is proposed consisting of 147 building lots and 18 common lots on 43.02 acres of land in the proposed R-8, R-15, C-N and C-C Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 127 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 12 of 30 zoning districts. Four phases of development are proposed with the residential portion proposing to develop in one phase. The storage facility is proposed to develop first. Access is proposed via one public street from both South Eagle Road and East Amity Roads. Gated private streets are proposed for security purposes with alleys and common driveways for internal access to the attached and detached units within the north phase of development, the Cadence portion. Twenty-five foot wide landscape street buffers are required along Eagle and Amity Roads. A minimum of ten percent qualified open space is required to be provided within the residential portion of the development. Sixteen point four percent is proposed and that does not include landscaped parkways, which also qualifies, which exceeds the minimum standards overall. A minimum of two qualified site amenities are required. A clubhouse, swimming pool, segments of the multi-use pathway system, an outdoor activity complex with amenities to be determined in the future are proposed, which also exceed the minimum standards. A planned unit development for an age restricted 55 and older gated community is proposed with a variety of housing types and setbacks unique to the unit and site design. Deviations from certain development standards are the following: Setbacks for the R-15 district as shown. Alleys designed so that the entire length is visible from a private street, rather than a public street and allowance of a through lot for the existing Hill home. Off-street parking is proposed in accord with UDC standards. Due to the width of the private streets on-street parking is only allowed on one side of the streets. An extra 30 spaces are proposed in the central portion of the development next to the community center, which can accommodate guest parking in addition to on-street parking. Concept elevations for the proposed single family -- single level attached patio homes and detached alley access homes were submitted as shown. A conditional use permit is requested for a 73,730 square foot, 443 units self service storage facility on 3.89 acres of land in the C-C zoning district. Access is proposed via driveway from Amity on the east side of the site, which also provides access to the commercial development to the east. An emergency only access is proposed via Amity on the west end of the site. Concept building elevations were submitted for the storage facility as shown. Building materials consist of vertical reveal metal panels with stucco finish, fiber cement panels with metal channel reveals and typical fascia with stone wall accents. Structures have setbacks for modulation along Amity Road. As noted in the development agreement modification analysis, the proposed elevations do not demonstrate a cohesive design that is proportionate to and blends with the residential buildings within the development as desired in the mixed use neighborhood designation. Therefore, staff is not supportive of the proposed concept elevations. Private streets for access to the units within the gated community were tentatively approved by the director, as was alternative compliance to UDC 11-3F-4A-4B to allow 124 units access off private gated streets and to UDC 11-3F-4A-6 to allow two common driveways off of private streets. The Commission did recommend approval of this overall application. Mike Wardle and David Turnbull, Brighton Corporation, testified in favor. No one testified in opposition or commented. Written testimony was received from David Palumbo and Mike Wardle, Brighton Corporation, in response to the staff report. Key issues of discussion. Mr. Palumbo would like to see the improvements, the four lane roadway expansion to Amity Road, completed prior to any development in this area commencing and concern pertaining to the adequacy of parking proposed for the development. Key issues of discussion by the Commission were as follows: Desire for the storage unit structures to Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 128 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 13 of 30 have nice design elements, not just metal, due to its location on a prominent corner. Question as to whether or not proposed dwelling units will be owner occupied or rental units. Answer is there is a section of independent living units next to the assisted living and memory care units that will be rental units for folks transitioning from a Cadence style product or somewhere in between. Services will be shared between the assisted living and the independent living. Other item of discussion. They were in favor of this type of use in close proximity to the YMCA and the city park. Supportive of age qualified use in this location due to area schools being over capacity. And, lastly, there was a suggestion that the applicant consider an L-shape for the storage facility that would allow more commercial retail office uses in front adjacent to Amity Road and possibly extend the storage facility further to the east on the backside. The Commission did not make any changes to the staff recommendation. The written testimony that's been received since the Commission hearing was from Mike Wardle, Brighton Corporation, in response to the Commission recommendation and I will go through that on the outstanding issues for Council. The applicant did submit revised site and landscape plans and a response to the Commission recommended with the following changes requested to DA provisions and/or conditions of approval. The first was deletion of number 1-A relating to existing DA provision 5.1 G2, which states the building in the retail -- the buildings in the retail professional office area shown on the concept development plan shall be arranged to create some form of common usable area, such as a plaza or green space as desired and mixed use designated areas as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. While staff recognizes there is a city park and YMCA nearby, the intent of this provision is for a common usable area to be provided in the commercial area with a commercial building surrounding the area. Therefore, staff does not support this requested change. Second, the applicant requested deletion of conditions 2-B, 3-C, 10-A and number 12 pertaining to the requirement a ten foot wide multi-use pathway and associated easement along Eagle and Amity Roads. The Parks Department is okay with deleting these conditions as the pathways are not depicted on the pathways master plan. Third, the addition of language to condition number 13 that would allow an exception for a building permit to be issued for the community center prior to the private streets receiving final approval. This is a UDC requirement 11-31F-3135 that would require approval of alternative compliance to change or Council approval as part of the PUD exceptions to code requirements might be considered as well. Modification to development agreement provision 5-1-E, which requires the existing home, which is Marty Hill's, to hook up to city water and sewer service within 60 days of services becoming available from the adjacent R-8 zoned property per Meridian City Code 9-1-4A, to instead require the home to be hooked up to city services within 60 days of the final platting of the estate lots. Public Works is amenable to the requested change if Council agrees. In response to development agreement provision 5-1 G6, which states nonresidential building should be proportional to and blend in with residential buildings, staff recommended revised elevations be submitted for the storage facility to comply with this provision, along with concept elevations for the commercial buildings and independent living units that demonstrate a cohesive design that is proportional to and blends in with the single family residential buildings or design guidelines be submitted and included in the development agreement that demonstrate consistency with this provision prior to the Council meeting. Rather than revise the elevations for the storage facility, the applicant opted to submit design Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 129 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 14 of 30 guidelines for the commercial portion of the development with photos of existing structures and concept elevations for the future dental office, storage facility and single family residential units, independent living units and senior living facility. And let me just clarify this is for the commercial and residential portion of the development, not just commercial. Staff has reviewed these guidelines and elevations and while the commercial elevations are all very consistent in design, as are the residential elevations separately, they do not blend with each other so far as sharing similar design elements, other than they are mostly proportional on height, which doesn't entirely meet the intent of this requirement. So, that is something Council will need to act on tonight. Staff will stand for any questions. Simison: Thank you, Sonya. Council, any questions? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Sonya, can you pull up kind of one of the maps of-- of the development? I just was curious how Mr. Hill is going to access his -- his property. On the application didn't it -- it wasn't clear to me. Allen: Yeah. Let's see. Just went past it. The color-- right there. That will work. So, do you see where the estate lots are kind of in the middle of that drawing? The print that says estate lots? Cavener: Yes. Allen: Okay. That -- right below that is where Marty Hill's home is. Cavener: Uh-huh. Allen: He will be accessing his home from the north and his shop -- well, actually, this drawing doesn't -- I believe his shop was being accessed from the east-west street to the south, but the applicant can clarify that. It doesn't appear that there is a driveway shown on this plan, but I think that's just an aerial. I believe he's accessing his shop from the southeast -- or southwest. Excuse me. Cavener: Thanks, Sonya. I'm sure the applicant will -- will address that for us. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I was hoping Sonya or someone in the Parks Department could give more of an overview on the pathway that they ideally would have wanted here and maybe just what Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 130 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 15 of 30 are we getting instead? Because it seems like a pretty high traffic area. There are already issues with pedestrians in the area. So, just some background on that. Allen: Mr. Mayor, I'm not sure if you would like me to speak to that. I'm not sure if anyone from Parks is in the meeting. Simison: Garrett is here. I don't know how familiar he is with this specific thing. We can defer to him and, if not, you can speak to it. Garrett? White: Mr. Mayor, Members of Council, I really don't have a whole lot of information to speak to you on this, other than the fact that, you know, it's not part of the master plan and like Sonya had said, really, that's -- that's all I have to say. Allen: Mr. Mayor. Previously the Parks Department was looking for a ten foot wide pathway in this location due to the location of the city park and the YMCA in this area and just the desire to have the nicer, wider pathway in this area and the school, of course, as well. The applicant requested removal of the condition. When push came to shove the Parks Department agreed that it was not on their pathways master plan, but it -- it could be placed by Council as a provision in the development agreement if you so wish. I believe that there is existing five foot wide sidewalks adjacent to this site along the public streets, so if -- if that occurred that would need to be widened to ten feet. Simison: Are there any other questions for staff at this point in time? Okay. I will ask the applicant to come forward. I see is -- well, I'm not going to presume which -- which one is going to be speaking, so if you could state your name and address for the record. Wardle: Mr. Mayor -- get our technology -- Mr. Mayor, Members of Council, I don't know if you are able to see us or not, but there are five of us in the room. This is Mike Wardle, director of planning for Brighton Corporation, given authorization by Mr. Hill to file the application. Also with us David Turnbull, Robert Phillips, president of Brighton Corporation, Lars Hansen, president of Brighton Homes. Simison: Mike, if I could stop you just for one second. We are having a real hard time hearing you. It sounds like you are away from the microphone. If someone could get closer. And now we cannot see you, but that's okay, but we need better audio. Wardle: I hope, Mr. Mayor, it's better now. Simison: More. More. Wardle: Okay. Simison: It got better and, then, it got really quiet. Wardle: Again Mike Wardle, director of planning for Brighton. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 131 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 16 of 30 Simison: Mike, it's not loud. There you go. Hansen: Can you hear that, Robert? Simison: Yes, perfect. Wardle: Okay. Mr. Mayor, once again just for the record, Mike Wardle, David Turnbull, Robert Phillips, Lars Hansen, and Jon Wardle are in the room. I will give kind of a brief opening. Sonya has done a great job of identifying the history of the project, which was all annexed and zoned and given conceptual approval in 2015. The easterly portion of the project that's identified on your screen. Hill Century Farm commercial subdivision, that easterly half of the area north of Century Farm Subdivision was specifically subdivided or preliminary platted and subsequent to the annexation and zoning. Obviously, the YMCA and the elementary school are in place, as is the Hillsdale -- Hillsdale City Park. There is already Commercial service development in that area of the commercial subdivision. Here is where we were talking about, then, would be to the westerly portion, centered around the Cadence, with the self storage identified immediately adjacent to the Idaho Power substation at the corner of Eagle and Amity, with an extension of professional and retail space along Amity going easterly to the already approved Century Farm commercial subdivision. We are in general agreement, but there are a few tweaks that Sonya has noted in a couple of the questions that have been asked by the Council. I want to go first of all to the pathways, so I want to go to the -- I believe about the third -- fourth issue -- maybe the fifth slide. One more. There we go. Right. Right. This shows the existing development area for the most part of Century Farm Subdivision. The areas along Eagle Road and Amity in the yellow are already approved and basically constructed with five foot sidewalks that were approved by both the Ada County Highway District, as well as the City of Meridian in your own development process. For instance, along Eagle Road, 3,364 linear feet of the 300 -- or 3,665 linear feet of approved sidewalk has already been constructed along Amity Road. Six hundred and fifty-seven of the approved 1,020 linear feet of sidewalk has been constructed. So, what the Parks Department was requesting was a ten foot pathway in the patched pink areas along both roadways, essentially just a quarter of a mile long in either direction, tying into already established and approved five foot sidewalks. It just didn't make any sense for us to do something that somebody would have to come back in the future, because we are beyond the opportunity to widen those five foot sidewalks, so did they really accomplish anything. When you look at the pathway plan to the right, it shows the green, which is proposed and a lot of that now has been completed, but all of the red pathways internal that lead from Eagle Road to the Hillsdale Park and Hillsdale Elementary School and YMCA, those multi-use pathways, ten foot wide, have all been constructed and we will complete the one going to the north that will tie into the existing plan. So, the city didn't have a plan for these items. They were a quarter of a mile long each and they were, essentially, just left there to join something that already exists that would not be improved in the future, unless the city came back and did those improvements. So, as a result the Parks Department agreed that having just those quarter mile segments did not seem to make much sense in the context of their plan. Be happy to answer questions on that particular item if you have them. If not, I will go to the next slide, which deals with Marty Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 132 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 17 of 30 Hill's property and this goes specifically to answer the question that I believe -- I'm not sure which Council Member asked how he would take access. You can see two arrows, one coming from the north, essentially it goes more directly to the home, which orients somewhat northwesterly and, then, from the cul-de-sac on the south he does have a large shop structure. He has equipment in that. It would have the opportunity to take access from the back. Now, the two link together, candidly, and so in theory he would have access points from the north and from the southwest and we did note specifically in the application that we were asking, essentially, for the opportunity for him to continue to have access in both directions. Staff, at to the time of the Planning Commission request, wondered if there was a plan in the future for subdividing Mr. Hill's property at some point down the line and, obviously, Marty does not have any plans to do that, but we did show how with the black hashed lines that those -- his large two and a half acre estate could be broken up into at least three, potentially more, but at least three lots under the existing structures. Any questions on that particular item? Then, Mr. Mayor, we really are down to two issues. They relate to the items that Sonya has brought to your attention. One being the -- what was defined as usable space in the commercial area. I want to go back to the commercial --or to the overall site plan, which would have been the first item. There we go. Yeah. One -- there you go. What's a little hard to anticipate at this point is how those retail and professional office pads will develop and so one of the concepts that we have put forward that we will, obviously, be able to share with staff subsequently. I don't know that we can do that at this point, but at the intersection of Tavistock Way, which is the north-south public street between the two commercial areas, there will be an extension of the service drive from the west to the east and so we will end up with an intersection opportunity where we can create a bit of a gathering place on any of those four corners or perhaps all four with some type of at least a space that would afford a sitting area, benches or something of that nature, that would give a place for gathering within the context of that overall project, but not necessarily in the center of that project. We do have a concept that we will provide the staff that we won't put to forth to the Council, but there is a way that we can deal with that as long as it's anticipated that it wouldn't have to be forced to be in the middle of the commercial areas, but could be kind of at the junction between the two on the north-south public street that connects that along to the south to the city park as well. So, we do have a potential solution for that item that we will share with us staff. I'm going to ask Lars Hansen to pick the question up at the moment. Hansen: Lars Hansen. Do I give my address? Okay. Okay. So, with respect to this open space that we are proposing here, this particular location is, in fact, between commercial uses and at this implied intersection that we will have with the drive aisle in Tavistock Avenue, it has a great opportunity to create a threshold really in a -- kind of a sense of entry to the entirety of the project, but also as a realistic stopping point for pedestrians that would be moving from those two commercial areas, you know, to the park or up towards Amity. So, we see that point, that node if you will, has been a real viable and a great opportunity to create a pedestrian oriented public experience there. So, I think we have some good concept plans for that that would work well with the intent of that request. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 133 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 18 of 30 Wardle: Mike Wardle once again. That condition could stand and I think it gives us the opportunity to work with staff to find a solution to it and it's an opportunity that we will -- you know, we will pursue as we get to the actual physical development of the project and have to go through the CZC and design review portion of the effort. Any questions about that particular item? Because I think we have really one more that we need to address. Well, Mr. Mayor, Council Members, then, going on. On page 38 of the staff report -- and Sonya alluded to it. There was a nice big not approved stamp over the top of the elevations proposed for the self service storage on Amity Road. The particular concern that Sonya just articulated a few minutes ago was the blending of those particular commercial uses with the residential. We -- we have concerns that we want to address in the form of the design guidelines that were provided and I'm going to turn the time to Jon Wardle and perhaps David Turnbull to talk about this particular -- Simison: Hey, Jon, we can't hear you. Hansen: Can we try to go to page 20 of this -- of the pdfs that are up in front of you. Right. Okay. Thanks. This is Lars Hansen again. Just wanted to speak to the architectural -- the context here that we are working within and as you can see there is some really high quality commercial buildings that have been constructed here in this area, which have, you know, the fine detailing and are great, you know, additions to this area. You know, we seek to compliment and continue with the aesthetic that's been established in this area I think as an overarching, you know, benefit to this location. The commercial design guidelines that we provided show that intends to continue with that high quality design and materiality that's been present in this area. What's unique about our site plan -- if you can just move to -- yes. Back two slides to look at the overall site plan. Thank you. Okay. So, in looking at what we have as far as context here and also the arrangement of the various uses -- and you can see that there is a continuity between the structures that face Amity -- starting from the school to the corner of Amity and Hillsdale and going out to facing on the north side, the commercial that we have along Amity and having that continuity remain as that, you know, logical street facing element seemed to be a good benefit to us in -- in maintaining that quality of architecture, but, then, you know, if you approach the corner there at Eagle Road and Amity, obviously, we have, as the primary element there, the electrical substation and as we were looking at the layouts for this piece and trying to, you know, find ways to properly buffer and transition from that industrial component to other more sensitive uses, having this storage facility here as a transitional piece to the commercial made a lot of sense and, then, also as a soft transition to the residential to the south they are backing up to one another, not facing, you know, in any way. So, they don't share a relationship between the residential and the storage unit in any way that they are perceived as, you know, an integrated whole, but more the storage unit provides a transition between, again, the industrial, you know, substation and the commercial uses. So, in as much as that's the case, you know, we felt it was appropriate to have the storage facility emulate the architecture -- the high quality designs that are present in the commercial uses throughout the project already. Ideally we feel that the storage facility should be, essentially, a background building. You know, it's well articulated and well proportioned, matching the commercial, but, essentially, not drawing undue attention to itself with details that might be distracting or Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 134 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 19 of 30 overly complex or ornate, for lack of a better word there. So, that was an intentional desire to make it match with the commercial for those reasons. So, are there any questions regarding that -- those comments? Simison: Council, any questions? And I think I saw on the time that we are near the applicant's end of their 15 minutes. I don't know if there is more that you guys have from Mike -- or Mike's presentation. Wardle: I do not have any additional items. Those were the two specifically and it's our feeling that the design -- perhaps as we get to CZC and design review on the self storage structures might be looking at color elements that might be more blending, but certainly the design is consistent with what's happened throughout the community, as well as in the project itself. Simison: Thank you. Council? Turnbull: Mr. Mayor, can I just interject one thing? This is David Turnbull. Simison: Yes. Turnbull: And -- and I appreciate that Sonya is dealing with code issues that she's trying to address, but it's our strong opinion that--that the residential needs to reflect residential and the commercial needs to reflect commercial and try to -- to try to make one look like the other or -- or somehow morph into the other is just an exercise in futility and won't yield the result that will be good for anybody, including the city. Simison: Okay. Turnbull: Thank you. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions for the applicant? Cavener: Mr. Mayor, this is Luke. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I have got a question I think for -- for Fire, but it pertains to at least some of the comments that the applicant made. I don't know if now is the appropriate time or if we want to wait until the public hearing is closed or the public hearing part is finished. Simison: I will leave that up to you. If you would like to ask them now go ahead. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, I don't know if Joe Bongiorno is on or can speak, but I'm just curious if there were any comments or considerations from Fire about how you are going to get your trucks to be able to kind of get to and through Mr. Hill's home and shop. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 135 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 20 of 30 Bongiorno: Mr. Mayor and Councilman Cavener, thank you for the question. That is a good question. I know Sonya asked -- so, the gentleman can address how we are getting to his house and, then, obviously, we need to make sure that there is a fire hydrant nearby and his driveway is, obviously, going to be over 150 feet long, so we are going to need to make sure that there is a turnaround out there that's firetruck friendly that meets the code. So, we have not discussed this project -- Mr. Hill's property specifically. Simison: Council, any further questions at this time? Strader: Mr. Mayor, I have a question. Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Question for Sonya and staff. It sounds like a pretty good compromise in the context of the overall development to do some type of an enhancement at that intersection where the road is and those two different commercial pieces meet. You know, do you think during design review we could have a requirement that everyone get on the same page during design review? Is that adequate to address that need for an amenity in the commercial in your view and also considerations about the storage? And I understand, you know, storage is often quite ugly looking, for lack of a better term, and so, hopefully, there is a way to sort of enhance it without making it a distraction for people. Allen: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Woman Strader, I believe that we can work with the applicant at the administrative level at certificate of zoning compliance application on the provision of a gathering area, plaza area within the commercial portion of the development. However, staff does need guidance on the applicant's somewhat lack of compliance with the consistency between the residential and the commercial elevations per our Comprehensive Plan. Staff's direction was directly from the Comprehensive Plan, so Council can provide some direction to staff on what they would like to see if -- if the applicant's proposed design guidelines are good, then, that's great just, please, say so and we will -- we will go with that. If -- if you feel that the applicant needs to provide more common design elements between the commercial and residential, I would like that direction as well. Thank you. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Sonya, I have a -- I would like some clarification I guess from you. Is there specifics on -- I can see from the photographs, the obvious difference between the elevations, but can you give some more detail as to what's missing between the two, so that we -- I guess -- I guess what I feel like is happening is that we are sort of telling the applicant like keep sending suggestions until one looks good and, then, we will -- we will move forward. Are we able to give the applicant some more specifics on what it is that we are expecting and they are not meeting? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 136 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 21 of 30 Allen: Yes. Mr. Mayor, Council Woman Perreault, Council, the -- the Comprehensive Plan -- one of the provisions in the Comprehensive Plan calls for nonresidential buildings to be proportional to and blend in with residential buildings and that's in the mixed use neighborhood designation. Mixed use areas -- typically we want to have some common design elements to integrate the residential and the commercial development. So, that's what we are after. Form wise, height wise, we are -- we are pretty much there I think between the two. We don't, for instance, have single story next to three story buildings or four story, but there are no common design elements between the residential and the commercial. Perreault: Mr. Mayor, a follow up if I may? Simison: Yes, Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Sonya, so you are -- you are talking about things like the materials that are used, maybe some similar landscape elements -- is that generally what you are talking about? Or like roof lines being similar? Allen: Roof lines are big. You know, all of the commercial concept elevations are pretty consistent with -- with their roof lines, as are the residential. There is just -- there is just nothing to tie them together. So, it's -- it's just some sort of -- I don't want to direct the applicant. I'm not trying to design their project. They just need to comply with the Comprehensive Plan. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Allen: And if you don't feel that -- if you feel that they are, then -- then, you know, it's -- it's within your purview to propose --or the --excuse me -- approve their design guidelines and concept elevations. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Yeah. I don't know if it was the applicant's slide or your slide, Sonya. Somebody was showing Hillsdale -- Hillsdale Elementary and the YMCA. Can we go back to those -- those photos? Allen: I'm not sure if they were in the applicant's or mine. Hoaglun: There we -- yeah. Those -- those photos there. You know, to me -- and if you go back to the elementary school, they -- they are -- I think back one more. Yeah. There is the elementary school. And, then, the Y was -- and the elementary school and Y are very similar. All of them have, you know, a flat roof and steel structure or wood structure coming out and to me it was -- they are -- they are the same, you know, for commercial structures -- structures they were tied together. I'm not a fan of that type of style that -- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 137 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 22 of 30 so, these -- these were built and they are in place now and now we are going to come in and that was approved and now we want the houses to have some design elements similar -- and I'm of the mind that I wouldn't want my house to have any of that design. I think to me it's -- it's commercial. It's a school. It's a Y. It's, you know, a health facility and there is other structures. I don't know how you tie that together in a way that makes a house look attractive to a buyer. But, again, design is -- is -- is not something that there is one way to do it and everyone likes that one way. Everyone has their different tastes, but -- but to me I struggle with saying, oh, the houses got to look something like this or some element of it and for this situation I just don't see it, but that's just -- that's just my take on it. Allen: Mr. Mayor, Council, if I may kind of respond. You know, typically -- typically in the mixed use neighborhood designated areas they are smaller neighborhood serving type of uses and they do more closely match the residential. A lot of them will have, you know, pitched roof lines, rather than the flat roofs. That's what we are looking for. This -- this development is a little different. There are larger, more commercial uses. You know, the YMCA, the -- the medical office buildings, so it -- it's -- it is a little more difficult I think in this situation. Parsons: So, Mr. Mayor? Simison: Mr. Parsons. Parsons: Yes. If I -- if I can kind of elaborate on this discussion that I'm hearing this evening. So, certainly this type of facility -- I think the intent that staff was trying to get out -- and I heard some of those comments from Council Woman Perreault, is yes, certainly building elements -- the same building materials play into that and landscaping certainly plays into that. Color schemes play into that. And I think the applicant has -- has done a very nice job --they actually built a facility out in Paramount in their Paramount development that included a lot of the same colors and design elements as their commercial office buildings out there and so I think from our perspective, as you look at the Comprehensive Plan and you -- and you see the standards or at least the guidelines that speak to complimentary design and integration, I think that was the intent that staff was trying to go for is making sure that color schemes and design themes, certain architectural embellishments that are on the commercial portion of the building can also be incorporated into the storage facility. So, it does look like it is an integrated development and I think the applicant -- probably should ask them if that's something that they can do with this development, because certainly the Paramount storage I think is one of the nicer storage facility -- facilities that we have in Meridian today. It's definitely an elevated design from what we typically see out there. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 138 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 23 of 30 Perreault: So, thank you for that, Bill. I think that probably gives more clarity to -- to it than -- than anything I have heard so far. I -- I agree with Councilman Hoaglun, which is why I asked that question, because, obviously, commercial and residential are intended to look a little bit different and I think the challenge for the applicant here is that there are already large existing commercial structures and if they -- if they tie the -- their -- their residence -- or their retail and their storage to look like the -- the residential piece, then, now it doesn't look like the other commercial pieces that are already there and so it's going to have to be something where they--they find this middle ground and I understand why they might have made the commercial design similar to the other commercial projects that are already built, to tie all the commercial and -- and the residential in separately, but I think what Mr. Parsons just stated that the color schemes --just the general feeling that all of this is in the same development is not the same thing as saying that the roof lines or the -- you know, that the structure -- that the commercial structures need to look residential and residential structures need to look commercial, which is -- it's -- I guess it is -- it's a difficult thing to -- to interpret, but as -- as Mr. Parsons suggested, would it be possible for us to ask the applicant if -- if there is anything more that they could do to make all of this look like it -- at least it's part of the same project, like they have done in Paramount? Simison: More than happy to. We are still in the applicant question period. So, I will ask the applicant if they would like to respond. Perreault: Thank you. Hansen: Hold on. Okay. Can you hear me well now? Simison: Yes. Hansen: This is Lars Hansen again. So, yes, I think that's a great approach would be to make sure that the materiality is consistent on the new structures in color and -- and type. The elevations that were proposed for the storage facility show perhaps some cooler colors and some masonry that we could modify to be more consistent with the existing elements. So, to bring that into similarity with the other structures would be something we definitely would be willing to do. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah, I think that -- that would be helpful if -- especially the storage. I think we have found in the past that the storage in particular can end up being kind of an eyesore, but I just -- so, if Sonya has some feedback. To me the most important aspect of that -- that part of the Comprehensive Plan in this instance is that there is a good continuity with the whole development. I think the worst thing that could happen would be for half of the commercial that already exists look completely different than the other half of the commercial on the same street. So, like I think as we are applying that part of the Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 139 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 24 of 30 Comprehensive Plan, like the context is really important and I do take to heart the fact that the residences do not face the commercial piece of the development and so I think in this case to me -- it's just one person, but my opinion is it's more important for the whole continuity of the whole development, as opposed to just, you know, this specific area. If that makes sense. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: To that point, the design guidelines that were proposed, the reference that attached to the staff report, speak to this very issue and talk about the blending of the colors and tones with the commercial and the storage units all together. In light of that discussion, Sonya, is there any concern over utilizing those design guidelines as the framework to that -- solving this issue? Allen: Mr. Mayor, Council, I don't have any issues with that. Borton: Yes. Simison: Okay. Is there any further questions for the applicant or staff at this time? Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: I have one more question for staff. Something that was mentioned in the staff report was that Council would need to approve the two accesses to the Hill property and I did not see that in the list of outstanding issues for Council, so I wanted to find out if -- if staff wants to make sure that we mention that in our deliberation and our motions today. Allen: Mr. Mayor, Council, Council Woman Perreault, I believe that was part of the planned unit development wrapped into that. So, there is no need for you to act separately on that. Perreault: Thank you. Allen: It's just the outstanding issues in your hearing outline for Council are really the ones that need to be addressed. Simison: Okay. With that, Adrienne, did we have anyone sign up in advance the testify? Weatherly: Mr. Mayor, we did not. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 140 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 25 of 30 Simison: Okay. Well, this is a public hearing. Is there anybody who is listening who would like to provide testimony on this item? If so, you can, please, raise your hand to alert the clerk and I will bring you in for -- for comments. Johnson: Mr. Mayor, this is Chris. There are no hands being raised. Simison: Okay. With that I guess I will turn it back over to the applicant to see if they would like to make any additional comments. Wardle: Mr. Mayor, Council Members, Mike Wardle. We don't have any additional issues. I think they have been discussed. I think the Council's direction seems clear and hopeful for being able to deal with these at the CZC and design review stage of the process. So, the only one question that I would respond to was the one put to the Fire Department relative to Mr. Hill's access. It actually will be a to and through. There would -- there would be an ability for any vehicular access to come in the southwest corner or the north side and actually be able to pass through the property. So, from a fire perspective there would not be any impediment for access to and through. Bongiorno: Awesome. Thank you. Wardle: With that we will leave it to the Council's discussion and discretion. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: I guess at this point I will move that we close the public hearing for Hill Century Farm North, H-2019-0134. Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Strader: Mr. Mayor, I will make a comment. Simison: Okay. Council Woman Strader. Strader: Appreciate the application before us. I know they did a -- a very nice job on the Cadence property in Paramount. I am thrilled that we are not seeing additional students enter the West Ada School District. It's an incredibly overcrowded area and I think it's a good use for the property. I'm supportive of the application with the caveat that during design review they work with Planning staff to iron out the details. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 141 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 26 of 30 Simison: Okay. Any other comments from Council at this time? Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: Just to go over notes of what I compiled on these decision points from what I think the collective conversation is on the outstanding issues. The DA provision 5.1 G -- two little is that talked about open space in the commercial component, that would remain to be facilitated as discussed by the applicant, most likely on the corners of the project. So, more of a location issue than -- so, I don't think that provision gets stricken. That's how I took it. But the second issue with regards to the pathway, that request still is that -- with that explanation that gets removed. The third with regards to condition number 13, that we would approve that as part of the PUD approval as well. And, then, the last one would -- with regards to the storage unit and blending its design, rather than providing new elevations, the solution would be utilizing the proposed design guidelines that were presented to facilitate the solution for the storage unit appearance. But I don't know if that missed anything that we have all discussed. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: Mr. Borton, did you want to include something in there about Marty Hill's connection to city water and sewer? Borton: That's the last one. Yeah. Which it didn't sound like anyone had any objection to from -- from our city staff. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: The one thing that I just realized I should have asked the applicant about, but -- so, we are going to have a 55 plus community that's backing up to a storage facility and the -- the city code has the hours as 6:00 to 11:00 and my hope is that those retail locations and the -- the retail that ends up going in and that -- and the storage facilities, maybe their hours would be a little bit -- just not so late. Maybe 10:00 p.m. And even though -- I don't have a question for the applicant, I'm wondering if we should make a suggestion -- or I guess we could include it in a requirement that the hours not be held so late, since it is right next to residential. What do the Council Members think about that? I know it's very common with storage units for people to be there late. Hoaglun: Well, Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 142 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 27 of 30 Hoaglun: Having -- having dealt with other commercial ventures that were near residential in my previous stint on Council, the hours established 6:00 to 11 :00 are pretty standard. I don't know why we would carve out an exception there. You know, we had an issue with the McDonald's over here on Cherry and what their hours were, so, you know, that-- since that was the standard business hours we left it at that. I mean certainly we can always put that in for there, but I -- I don't know why we would do some -- some commercial or storage facilities that backup to residential --and there is quite a few. There is one on Chinden was one that we approved that had those hours and it was against residential. I don't know if we would want to have that disparity out there and that's -- that's my only comment on that. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I appreciate so much our Council Members kind of being sensitive to potential residents and things of that nature. I -- I urge caution, though, about creating a certain exception for a particular business. As we have seen these facilities kind of build up around Meridian, to my understanding I don't think I have ever received a noise complaint or a letter from a citizen who is upset about the noise that are coming out of these buildings. They are not something where there is a lot of traffic in there on a daily basis and my belief is that the vast majority of our citizens that are using these are going to be using them, you know, daytime hours, on weekends, so I just think it's a dangerous precedent for us to start carving out. If we want to take a larger look at the hours that we want to let storage units operate, I think that's a great conversation, but picking out something, while well intended for one particular business, is not something I think we should -- we should look at at this time. Simison: Council, any further comments or would someone like to proceed with a motion? Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: I will make a motion on this application. I move that we approve Item 5-E, H- 2019-0134, to include as presented in the staff report and following our discussion, which will -- it will keep as one of the conditions that 5.1 G two little is with regards to open common usable areas within the commercial component, which will be incorporated as discussed by the applicant and staff in today's hearing. That the condition with regards to the ten foot pathway be removed in light of what was presented. That condition number 13 allowing the exception for a building permit to be issued for the community center prior to the private streets receiving final approval be permitted as part of the PUD exceptions to the code standards. That condition 5.1 E, which requires the existing home to hook up to city water and services within 60 -- within 60 days of service becoming available from the adjacent R-8 zoned property and, finally, that with regards to provision 5.1 G, VI, Roman numeral six, that the storage unit design will be consistent and subject to the Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 143 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 28 of 30 applicant's proposed design guidelines, which are presented and attached to the staff report for today's application and that the solution with regards to Mr. Hill's driveway and fire access be incorporated as presented in today's hearing. Perreault: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second. Is there any discussion on the motion? Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: A question to Councilman Borton. On the 60 days for Marty Hill's hook up to sewer and water, that allows him to hook up to city services within 60 days of the final platting of the estate lots, is that what you wanted to -- Borton: Correct. Hoaglun: Thank you. Simison: All right. If there is no further comments, I will ask the clerk to call the roll. Roll call: Bernt, yea; Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, yea; Perreault, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion passes. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 6: Future Meeting Topics Simison: Item 6, Future Meeting Topics. Do we have anything under Item 6? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Not -- maybe a topic, but not necessarily -- I'm just curious. I noticed that the public comment portion has kind of went away from our agenda. I assume that went away from this virtual environment. Where we don't know when we are all going to be back in Council chambers, my hope is that your guys' next agenda setting meeting that we can look to -- to find a way to incorporate that in this virtual environment. I think it's a good opportunity for our citizens to be able to provide feedback to us, ask questions while they are watching from home. Simison: Okay. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 144 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 29 of 30 Bernt: Consider it done. Item 7: Amended Onto Agenda: Executive Session per Idaho Code 74- 206(d): To consider records that are exempt from disclosure as provided in Chapter 1, Title 74, Idaho Code. Simison: Is there further items? If not I will entertain a motion. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I move that we adjourn the meeting. Actually, no, not yet. We are going to go to -- we are going to an Executive Session. Simison: Correct. Bernt: I move that we go into Executive Session per Idaho Code 74-206-(d). Hoaglun: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to go into Executive Session. Is there any discussion on the motion? Strader: Mr. Mayor, are we -- are we going into this pre -- the same meeting we had previously? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, this is Chris. Per Mr. Nary's direction, I just e-mailed you a new link to an Executive Session. So, we will end and I will restart it, be able to go to that Executive Session and, then, come back in the meeting here. Simison: Okay. Perfect. Clerk will call the roll. Roll call: Bernt, yea; Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, yea; Perreault, yea. Simison: All ayes. We will adjourn into Executive Session. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (7:32 p.m. 8.04 p.m.) Cavener: Move that we come out of Executive Session. Hoaglun: Second. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 145 of 272 Meridian City Council April 21,2020 Page 30 of 30 Simison: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Cavener: Move we adjourn. Hoaglun: Second. Simison: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:04 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 4 / 28 / 2020 MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item -5.A. Presenter: Jenna Fletcher, MPR Recreation Coordinator Estimated Time for Presentation: 5 minutes Title of Item - Public Hearing: Proposed 2020 Summer Fee Schedule Updates of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department Click Here to Sign Up to Testify at Hearing Council Notes: ATTACHMENTS: MPR 2020 Summer Fee Schedule Updates Resolution 3/27/2020 Exhibit A Exhibit 3/27/2020 REVIEWERS: R111 ction Parks and Recreation lWeatherly,Adrienne Approved 3/27/2020 - 3:45 PM Parks and Recreation Myers, Rachel Approved 3/27/2020 - 5:47 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 3 of 113 CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT,BORTON,CAVENER, HOAGLUN,PERREAULT, STRADER A RESOLUTION ADOPTING NEW FEES OF THE MERIDIAN PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT; AUTHORIZING THE MERIDIAN PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO COLLECT SUCH FEES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 5tr WHEREAS, following publication of notice in the Meridian Press on April 10, 2020 and April 17, 2020, according to the requirements of Idaho Code section 63-1311A, on April 21, 2020 the City Council of the City of Meridian held a hearing on the adoption of proposed new fees of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department, as set forth in Exhibit A hereto; and WHEREAS, following such hearing, the City Council,by formal motion, did approve said proposed new fees of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department; NOW THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That the 2020 Summer Fee Schedule of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department, as set forth in Exhibit A hereto, is hereby adopted. Section 2. That the fees adopted for the 2020 Summer Activity Guide shall remain in effect as to those classes until such classes are concluded, at which point the fees set forth in Exhibit A hereto shall supersede any and all fees for the enumerated services previously adopted. Section 3. That the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department is hereby authorized to implement and carry out the collection of said fees. Section 4. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this day of Apr. 2020. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this day of Apr. 2020. APPROVED: Robert Simison, Mayor ATTEST: Chris Johnson, City Clerk ADOPTION OF FEE SCHEDULE OF MERIDIAN PARKS&RECREATION DEPARTMENT PAGE 1 OF 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 4 of 113 CITY OF MERIDIAN NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN,pursuant to the ordinances of the City of Meridian and the laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 21, 2020, at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, regarding proposed new and amended fees as set forth below. Further information is available at the Parks&Recreation Department at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at the public hearing. Written testimony is welcome; written materials should be submitted to the City Clerk. All testimony and materials presented shall become property of the City of Meridian. For auditory, visual, or language accommodations, please contact the City Clerk's Office at (208) 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public hearing. Proposed new or amended fees: EXHIBIT A 2020 Summer Activig Guide Class Fees: Tumble &Flip Classes: ages 6 & older, beginning $52.00 Acro & Intermediate Tumbling $60.00 Kendo—Japanese Fencing $35.00-$70.00 H.O.S.T. Basketball Cams $59.00 DATED this day of , 2020. Chris Johnson, CITY CLERK PUBLISH on April 10 and April 17. ADOPTION OF FEE SCHEDULE OF MERIDIAN PARKS&RECREATION DEPARTMENT PAGE 2 OF 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 5 of 113 Exhibit Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 6 of 113 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item -5.13. Presenter: Jenna Fletcher, MPR Recreation Coordinator Estimated Time for Presentation: 5 minutes Title of Item - Resolution No. 20-2198: A Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Meridian Adopting the Summer 2020 Fee Schedule Updates of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department; Authorizing the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department to Collect Such Fees; and Providing an Effective Date Council Notes: ATTACHMENTS: Descriptio oa MPR Dept. 2020 Summer Fee Schedule Updates Resolution 3I27/2020 Exhibit A Exhibit 3/27/2020 REVIEWERS: ent Revi Parks and Recreation Weatherly,Adrienne Approved 3/27/2020 -6:56 PM Parks and Recreation Myers, Rachel Approved 3/30/2020 - 9:48 AM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 7 of 113 CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO.20-2198 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT,BORTON,CAVENER, HOAGLUN,PERREAULT, STRADER A RESOLUTION ADOPTING NEW FEES OF THE MERIDIAN PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT; AUTHORIZING THE MERIDIAN PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO COLLECT SUCH FEES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 5tr WHEREAS, following publication of notice in the Meridian Press on April 10, 2020 and April 17, 2020, according to the requirements of Idaho Code section 63-1311A, on April 21, 2020 the City Council of the City of Meridian held a hearing on the adoption of proposed new fees of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department, as set forth in Exhibit A hereto; and WHEREAS, following such hearing, the City Council,by formal motion, did approve said proposed new fees of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department; NOW THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That the 2020 Summer Fee Schedule of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department, as set forth in Exhibit A hereto, is hereby adopted. Section 2. That the fees adopted for the 2020 Summer Activity Guide shall remain in effect as to those classes until such classes are concluded, at which point the fees set forth in Exhibit A hereto shall supersede any and all fees for the enumerated services previously adopted. Section 3. That the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department is hereby authorized to implement and carry out the collection of said fees. Section 4. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 21stday of Apr. 2020. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 21st day of Apr. 2020. APPROVED: Robert E. Simison, Mayor ATTEST: Chris Johnson, City Clerk ADOPTION OF FEE SCHEDULE OF MERIDIAN PARKS&RECREATION DEPARTMENT PAGE 1 OF 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN,pursuant to the ordinances of the City of Meridian and the laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 21, 2020, at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, regarding proposed new and amended fees as set forth below. Further information is available at the Parks&Recreation Department at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at the public hearing. Written testimony is welcome; written materials should be submitted to the City Clerk. All testimony and materials presented shall become property of the City of Meridian. For auditory, visual, or language accommodations, please contact the City Clerk's Office at (208) 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public hearing. Proposed new or amended fees: EXHIBIT A 2020 Summer Activig Guide Class Fees: Tumble &Flip Classes: ages 6 & older, beginning $52.00 Acro & Intermediate Tumbling $60.00 Kendo—Japanese Fencing $35.00-$70.00 H.O.S.T. Basketball Cams $59.00 DATED this 21 st day of April, 2020. Chris Johnson, CITY CLERK PUBLISH on April 10 and April 17. ADOPTION OF FEE SCHEDULE OF MERIDIAN PARKS&RECREATION DEPARTMENT PAGE 2 OF 2 Exhibit Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 10 of 113 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 5.C. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: Title of Item - Request for Reconsideration for Frazier Council Review (H-2020-0011) by Elisabeth Songe,Appellant (Represented by Jim Jones) Council Notes: Ad% ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Upload Date Request for Reconsideration Cover Memo 4/9/2020 Elisabeth Songe Declaration Exhibit 4/9/2020 Exhibit A Exhibit 4/9/2020 Jenny Hay Declaration and Exhibits Exhibit 4/9/2020 REVIEWERS: Clerk. Weatherly,Adrienne Approved 4/9/2020 -9:43 AM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 11 of 113 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION To: Meridian City Council From: Jim Jones, attorney for Elisabeth Songe (Appellant) Re: Frazier Council Review (H-2020-0011), City of Meridian The Appellant, Elisabeth Songe, acting through her attorney, Jim Jones, hereby requests reconsideration of the City Council's decision of March 24, 2020, revoking Appellant's Accessory Use Permit no. 2019-0388. The revocation was made in the proceeding designated as Frazier Council Review (H-2020-0011) on the grounds that Appellant had failed to hold a neighborhood meeting as required by Meridian Unified Development Code section 11-4-3-9(A)(6). This request for reconsideration is made pursuant to Meridian City Code section 1-7-10. Prior to addressing the deficiencies in the revocation proceeding, some preliminary comments may be appropriate. This attorney agreed this past weekend to represent Appellant in all matters through the course of these proceedings. Due to the short time frame for submitting this request, it was not possible to involve my law firm's secretarial staff. Apologies are offered for the form of this document and the two supporting declarations. The grounds for seeking reconsideration are: 1. The record before the City Council on March 24 supported a finding that a neighborhood meeting was held by Appellant on November 21, 2019, and the complainant, Nicholas Frazier, had no basis to testify that the meeting did not occur. 2. Mr. Frazier's appeal was tardy, if he is considered to be a party of record. 3. The notice of hearing for Mr. Frazier's appeal was deficient in providing notice to Appellant that her childcare permit was in danger of being revoked. Appellant's application file contains a copy of the neighborhood meeting notice, dated November 7, 2019. It is attached to the Declaration of Jenny Hay as Exhibit B. It says a neighborhood meeting was scheduled for 6:30 pm at the Songe home, 5343 N. Maplestone Ave., on November 21, 2019. The file contains a blank sign-up sheet, with the notation, "No attendance--spoke w/ some neighbors on street--didn't care to attend/no concerns." Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 12 of 113 Granted, this is fairly slim evidence in the record as to the actual conduct of the meeting. However, there is no competent evidence in the record that a meeting did not take place. Mr. Frazier says he did not attend a meeting but he has established no basis to certify that it did not happen. The Declarations of Jenny Hay and Appellant show that there was planning for a meeting, the Appellant was present at the time and place scheduled for the meeting and that nobody came. Ms. Hay states in paragraph 2 of her Declaration that she contacted the Meridian Planning staff on behalf of the Appellant on October 30, 2019, to request the names and addresses of people who would need to be invited to the neighborhood meeting. That email is the sixth page of Exhibit A to her Declaration. She received those names and addresses from Kim Tabarini on November 7, 2019. Ms. Hay states in paragraph 3 of her Declaration that she and Appellant prepared the meeting notice on November 7 and that she personally mailed copies of the meeting notice to all of the property owners named on the list she received from the City--Nicholas Frazier, Roger Howell, Challenger Development, Inc., and Jump Creek Subdivision HOA, Inc. Specifically, she placed a copy of the notice in envelopes addressed to each owner and deposited the same, postage prepaid, in the U.S. mail on November 7, 2019. It should be noted that both of the Declarations submitted in support of the Request for Reconsideration are made under penalty of perjury under Idaho Code section 9-1406. As a general rule in Idaho, service of a document is presumed to have provided notice to the addressee at the time it is mailed in the manner Ms. Hay did in this case. Although this is not a court civil action, Rule 5(b)(2)(C) of the Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure provides that when a document is served by mail the "service is complete upon mailing." There is no specific comparable provision in the Meridian City Code, but there are a number of provisions in the Code making the revocation of a permit "effective immediately upon mailing" by the City. The notice sent to Appellant in this proceeding contains that language. Mr. Frazier apparently claims that he did not receive the meeting notice, but there is a legal presumption that he did. Roger Howell, another landowner on the list provided by the City, acknowledged that he "did receive the notice in the mail for the neighborhood meeting." See, Hay Declaration, Paragraph 3 and Exhibit A, 8th page. As further support that the notice was mailed, Ms. Hay states that she mentioned to the property manager of Jump Creek Subdivision HOA on November 18 that the neighborhood Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 13 of 113 meeting was to take place on November 21. Hay Declaration, paragraph 3 and Exhibit C, page 1. Another thing to consider in this context is that Joseph Dodson, as the City's Associate Planner, stated to the Mayor and Council in his Memorandum regarding Mr. Frazier's appeal, that the Appellant had "submitted all required documentation to the Planning Department." Elisabeth Songe certainly believed that she had done so. With regard to the issue of whether Mr. Frazier's appeal was tardy, It would depend on whether he was a party of record to the licensing proceeding. The Notice of Approval of Appellant's application, dated January 2, 2020, states that an appeal of the licensing decision must be filed by a "party of record" no later than January 17, 2020. Mr. Frazier's appeal was filed 5 days later on January 22. He would be an interested party, being within 100 feet of the Songe property, he was named on the list of property owners provided to Appellant by the City and Ms. Hay testified that she mailed him a meeting notice. That combination of factors could well qualify him as a party of record, making his appeal tardy. A more troubling factor is that the notice for the City Council's March 24 public hearing on this matter did not advise Appellant that her childcare permit was in jeopardy, depending on what occurred at the hearing. A fundamental concept of Constitutional due process is that a person may not be deprived of a property interest without reasonable notice and an opportunity for a hearing. The hearing is not the problem here. The problem is that nothing in the hearing notice warned Appellant that her childcare license was at risk. She so states in her Declaration. The postcard notice, which is attached to Appellant's Declaration as Exhibit A, says the hearing is "To Review Director's Approval of an Accessory Use for a Daycare, Family(A-2019-0388)." There is nothing to indicate that a complaint had been lodged against her license or that the license might be subject to revocation as a result of the hearing. This is not intended as criticism of city staff because Ms. Hay and Appellant have been very appreciative of their professionalism and courtesy. It is just that the notice did not indicate what was at stake in the hearing. Elisabeth Songe is not proficient in English so it was even more difficult for her to understand what was at issue. She states in paragraph 3 of her Declaration that she was concerned about going to a public meeting the night of March 24 since there were government orders to not attend large meetings because of the disease. The City issued a social distancing order on March 21 and the Governor had declared a state of emergency on March 13. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 14 of 113 Nevertheless, Appellant states she would have attended the hearing if she had known that her license was in danger. Ms. Hay exercised reasonable diligence to ensure that Elisabeth followed all of the requirements for obtaining the childcare license, including preparation for the neighborhood meeting. Elisabeth and her husband were available at the time and place set for the meeting but nobody came. Earnings from the childcare business were one-half of the family income and those earnings allowed the family to purchase the home. Elisabeth's husband has had his hours cut back because of the coronavirus disease, which will make it difficult for the family to make their house payments. For the foregoing reasons, it is respectfully requested that the Council grant reconsideration in this matter and vacate the license revocation. /s/ Jim Jones Jim Jones, Bar Number 1136 Attorney for appellant Elisabeth Songe 800 West Main, Suite 1300 Boise, Idaho 83702 iimilust270)gmail.com (208)513-4185 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 15 of 113 Declaration of Elisabeth Songe Re: Frazier Council Review (H-2020-0011), City of Meridian The Declarant, Elisabeth Songe, hereby states and declares, with the assistance of a Swahili-English interpreter, as follows: 1. I wish to appeal the final decision reached at the March 24, 2020 public hearing regarding the Frazier Council Review. I am requesting a reconsideration of that decision to revoke my Accessory Use Permit for a childcare at my home at 5343 N. Maplestone Ave. in Meridian. I think it was based on a mistake regarding the neighborhood meeting and another mistake about the possible outcome of Mr. Frazier's complaint. 2. The letter of revocation I received, dated March 30, 2020, states that the Meridian City Council "...reversed the Director's action due to insufficient evidence that a neighborhood meeting was held in accord with Meridian Unified Development Code 11-4-3-9(A)(6." With the help of Jenny Hay at Jannus Economic Opportunity's Refugee Childcare Business Development project, and my husband Didier, I completed invitation letters dated 11/7/2019 to the four owners of properties within 100 feet of my property, describing my proposed childcare and inviting them to a neighborhood meeting on November 21, 2019 at 6:30 pm. I asked Jenny Hay to mail the four invitations on November 7, 2019. The addresses to which Jenny mailed the invitations were provided to Jenny by Kim Tabarini with the City of Meridian. On November 21 , 2019, 1 and my husband Didier waited at our 5343 N. Maplestone home all evening, with lights on, but no one came to join us for a meeting. In the permit application documents I submitted at City Hall, I included the invitation and sign-in sheet, with notation that no one attended. 3. Neither I nor my husband Didier attended the public hearing on March 24, 2020, because as English language learners, we were confused with the language of the public hearing postcard mailing and sign. Shortly after receiving the mailing, we attended a medical appointment and asked the case worker to review the mailing with us. My understanding, after a limited conversation with the case worker, was that the hearing was not required for me, but only for neighbors who had concerns or questions about my permit. I believed it was a formality and that I was only receiving the mailing to know I was invited to attend. Before the meeting, there were government orders to not attend large meetings because of the disease and we did not want to go anywhere that wasn't required. I did not recognize the name listed on the sign (Nick Frazier) and did not understand that anyone had appealed my permit. A copy of the postcard we received is attached as Exhibit A. It did not say what the hearing was about or that my childcare license could be at risk. Had I known the hearing could result in my losing the permit, I would have been there. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 16 of 113 4. The money I got from the childcare business is half of the family income and I don't think we would have qualified for a home loan without it. My husband's work hours have been cut back because of the disease and I'm afraid we won't be able to make payments to the bank for our house if I don't have my childcare money. It has taken a long time to save up the house money. 5. When I received the letter of revocation, I did not fully understand it and communicated immediately with Jenny Hay on April 2, 2020 for assistance. 6. This declaration is made on my personal knowledge and under penalty of perjury. Dated this 6th day of April, 2020. /s/ Elisabeth Songe Elisabeth Songe Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 17 of 113 Vicinity map Co Of Meridian Public Hearing NQ& E3- El Located: 33 East Broadway, MeridOn. ID F "n Date and Time-.March 24,2020 6p.m. ADO tation'. Fraser Council Review H-202CIi-00 11 IF "Woo Applicaut: Wk Frazier Lpwted: 5343 N Maplesirone Ave LtKIMA n- hTl:pWNl.Iy)H-2020-0011 Ri "P:* IL' IL iW 1,To Review DrmcWs Approval of an A=Gsaory ---------- Use ky a Daycare,Farn6y(A-21319-0388) EARP62 AMP" LC- H —O-W T 0 PROVIDE COMM ENT$ Any interested person!,wishing to restify are wel. �Orne W 130 so at the ptA*hearing listed on this nDtificalian. Oral teafton.V m* bL-J mked to L P..f minutes per Person. Writ1eq testimony may be sub, muted prior to the hearing date either by mail of in person to Meridian C Ity Clerk. 33 E. Broadway Suite a#1 $ 00 m. e 104.Meridian,Idaho 83542 U by arnail.to 63 2G20,' �"'t-IcierkPrneri-diaricity,org. by voicernail at 208-288 -5W1.Or by texting the word-Cornment'to 3 1 9s(;. All written testimony and all materials presented at the hearing become property of the City of Meridian and public records subject to the provisions of the Idaho Public RecioTdS Act. Applications are sul)jer-t 10 change througliout the public hearing process and it is incumbent on interested persons to mom.lof KOZI N D I LA D I DIER.SONGE E L I SABE T H such changes by followifls.the process In person, 5343 N MAPLESTONE AVE Online.or by contacting City staff.See h4w ti#.Iyl2158PH.Gortact the Comrnunt y Devuloprnpnll MIFR I D IAN, 11)8 364&0000 Department at 2 D&W-5533 10F m(Ke inforrn&i- L%=MMWA-n0NS Anyone desiring accommodation for disabl lities rtfted to Hv dQcurnenis andlor hearings please Contact trm Ci y Clerk's Office at 2DB-888.4433 st least 72 hours prior to the hearing- Fr8qDVWAqhQLQUggjgDj h1tps: ROic Heuring Notices:.-hrtp!;:iimmnclian"N?7 phrictcese Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020- Page 18 of 113 Declaration of Jenny Hay Re: Frazier Council Review (H-2020-0011), City of Meridian The Declarant, Jenny Hay, hereby states and declares, as follows: 1. I am the Project Manager of Refugee Childcare Business Development (RCBD) for the Economic Opportunity program of Jannus, Inc. Jannus is a non-profit corporation that operates a range of social service programs in the State of Idaho, including projects to facilitate self-sufficiency in Idaho's refugee community. My project is designed to assist refugees in establishing and operating in-home family child care businesses, compliant with all local and state requirements. Most refugees are unfamiliar with our licensing or permitting systems, and many are not yet English-proficient, so a significant part of my work is directed toward assisting with obtaining child care licensing, as well as permitting, training, and certifications. We hire interpreters whenever needed to support our clients who are English language learners. 2. Elisabeth Songe has been a client of RCBD since 2016, when she began a licensed in-home childcare in her Boise rental home with the support of RCBD. I worked closely with Elisabeth and her husband, Didier, to set up Elisabeth's child care in a new home they were purchasing at 5343 N. Maplestone in Meridian. On October 30, 2019, 1 emailed Meridian Planning staff to request the names and addresses of homeowners we would need to invite to the neighborhood meeting required under the City Code. I have attached a packet of pertinent documents, which is marked as Exhibit A, and that email is the sixth page of the attachment (please disregard the page numbers at the bottom of these pages). On October 30, 1 received a list of names and addresses of owners of thirteen properties that were indicated to be within 100 feet from the Songe property. The list was provided by Kim Tabarini and is the fifth page of Exhibit A. All but two of those properties were listed in the ownership of the developer, Challenger Development, or the homeowners' association, Jump Creek Subdivision HOA. 3. 1 then worked with Elisabeth Songe, who is an English language learner and not yet English-proficient, to prepare a notice for a neighborhood meeting to discuss the application. The notice we prepared is dated November 7, 2019, and attached as Exhibit B. The meeting was to be at the Songe home at 6.30 pm on November 21 , 2019. 1 personally mailed four notices on November 7, 2019--one to Roger Howell, one to Nicholas Frazier, one to Challenger Development, Inc., and one to Jump Creek Subdivision HOA, Inc. I placed a copy of the notice in an envelope addressed to each owner and deposited the same, postage prepaid, in the U.S. mail on November 7, 2019. Page 10 of Exhibit A is a note I made to Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 19 of 113 document the mailing of the notices. Page 8 is an email from Roger Howell, dated April 3, 2020, acknowledging that he had received the notice but decided not to attend the neighborhood meeting because he had no objection to the application. On November 18, 2019, 1 emailed the manager for the HOA, who I had been working with to get HOA approval for the childcare, to say that the neighborhood meeting was scheduled for the 21 st. This is what I said: "Elisabeth's neighborhood meeting, per code, will be Thursday 11/21, then we'll submit all the permit application docs to the city." This appears on the first page of Exhibit C. 4. On November 22, 2019, the day after the scheduled neighborhood meeting, I received a text message from Elisabeth Songe and her husband Didier, who informed me that they had been home all night with the lights on but nobody came to the meeting. 5. This declaration is made on my personal knowledge and under penalty of perjury. Dated this 6th day of April, 2020. /s/Jenny Hay Jenny Hay Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 20 of 113 Jenny Hay From: Jenny Hay Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 2:43 PM To: Jennifer Hay Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] 300 & 100 ft Radius - Neighbor addresses needed - 5343 N Maplestone Attachments: AddressList.csv,AddressLabels.pdf,AddressList.cfs-v,AddressLabels.pdf f Jenny Hay Project Manager Refugee Childcare Business Development 1607 W Jefferson Street :: Boise, ID 83702 208-947-4262 :: ihay cr iannus.org eoiannus.org ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY aY JANNUS Privacy Notice: This message from JANNUS, Inc. and any attachments are intended only for the personal and confidential use of the addressee or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, are not a named recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, do not deliver, distribute or copy this transmission, disclose its contents or take any action based on the information It contains. if yvu have received this communication in error, notify us immediately at 208.336.5533 and delete the message and any attachments from your system. From: Kimberley Tabarini [mailto:ktabarini@meridiancity.org] Sent:Wednesday, October 30, 2019 4:41 PM To:Jenny Hay<Jhay@jannus.org> C1.. U111 rgIJVIIJ<UpgIJVIIJLWIIICIIU IdIII.IIy.VIg> Subject: [EXTERNAL] 300& 100 ft Radius- Neighbor addresses needed -5343 N Maplestone Good Afternoon Jenny, I left you a voicemail regarding this information. I received the forwarded message below from Bill Parsons our Planning Supervisor,since Kevin Holmes is no longer with the City of Meridian. Attached you will find two sets of the Property Owner Lists,one within a 300 ft.&and the other within 100 ft. radius of the property marked with a red X in the Vicinity Maps below. I have included the CSV raw data file as well as the PDF address file for each.Since we did not have enough information to determine if a 300 foot or 100 foot list was needed, I provided both. The City does not have a standard letter that is required for a neighborhood meeting.There are some key elements you should include when sending out your notices for that meeting:location,date/time, project name and a brief explanation/description of your project. Make sure to have a sign-in sheet at your meeting for neighbors to sign that they were in attendance. 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 21 of 113 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 22 of 113 Vicinity Map 0'7$ Y�t,Eles Legend'. -- R-1 '., � _- :rsav � t.';._Gri�r.•r�e-,y,. aG-,t^'.�t_v. '• �:net+c>'o�'.04�"?•'MOsq'+1el,v-. =a_rr_, MPrC a U',LO d'*n ( -- - — p— ri r.�:i xC�+Y+.Yis1 au f e•.,"�ti ea C��.:'r� = F'ot�eL-AdcCa I _. t.�`R-, \ ! �ia� $� CD,�,h�_�R.�~4 ti•�T Y I '-'L'r'• _ lQln='© w AVKu ua -Q X R-15 -_t=_jr - I IT i r -- --w•b1fhUL'L•AN EAU-. �0 Aw E IDIAN , Print DnEe :OfWj-'O1 i User 70t^n, -200 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 23 of 113 Legend Parcels-Ado Cwnly zi RUT ther 11 Map if you have any questions regarding the attached information please feel free to contact Bill Parsons or myself. My contact information is below. Kind Regards, Kim Tabarini | Administrative Assistant U City ofMeridian | Community Development S3E. Broadway Ave, Suite 102 Meridian, Idaho O3G4Z Phone:4O9'U57O 8u8tfbr Business, Dask/nedfbrLiving All e-mail messages sent tno/received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject m the Idaho low, 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21.coco— Page 24of113 x � z z z z x �Q z z x � � v 4�- � .P -P� •P � � -9:- -P � .P -P v J v v V v J v v v v v v O rn rn rn m rn rn rn am m m rn m rn 70 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 w 00 00 00 0 rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O W W W W N N I-� O O O (J1 U'7 l!1 M .P N O N O W M4�, N l0 00 W O O O O O O O O O O O O O yam . - n n n n n n n n n m _ (D D D > D D D D D D N S n m m m m m m m m m m m ( � n r z z z z z z z z z z _ r h m M G) G) G) G) G) G) G) G) Z m LA d rn m m m m m m m m n T O -� G) v (� W O C m \_� 0 m m m m m m m m m N 1 } C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m m m m m m m m Z z Z z Z z z z z S D Z z z z z z z Z z D n n n n n n n n n R e�- i N N N N N N N N N D cn oo D u, D c� N �I �I �I �I -,1 v II �1 �I m w N m w Q C m m m m m m m m m Z Z N J D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D m m m m m m m m m D D z 7, 70 -v o v t O T m r r r r r r r r r r m r Z D D D D D D D D D V) z V) O �! N Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z z m -4 S 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O 0 p cn C z z z z z 1 mull �^ 1 O m m m m m m m m m m O m C C f" m O_ v D D D D D D D D D D p D (D 00 z z z z z z z z z z 00 z N 00 00 00 00 00 w 00 00 00 00 00 w w w w w w w w w w w o m m m m m m m m m m 0 rn 00 N N N N N N NJ NJ NJ 00 m `1 C' C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ` V Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 25 of 113 in regards to both release and retention,and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law. From: Bill Parsons<bparsons@meridiancity.org> Sent:Wednesday, October 30, 2019 2:24 PM To: Kimberley Tabarini<ktabariniC«@meridiancity.org> Subject: FW: Neighbor addresses needed -5343 N Maplestone Hi Kimmie, Would you please assist Ms. Hay with his neighborhood meeting list. He didn't provide enough information to know if it is the 300 or 100 foot radius. Thanks, Bill Parsons,AICP I Planning Supervisor City of Meridian I Community Development Dept. 33 E. Broadway Ave.,Ste. 102, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-884-5533 1 Fax: 208-489-0571 C,t!J B PIF Built for Business, Designed for Living ©1:1®E © All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in regards to both release and retention,and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law. From:Jenny Hay<Jhav@iannus.org> Sent:Wednesday, October 30, 2019 2:17 PM To: Kevin Holmes<kholmes@meridiancity.org> Cc: nate@idahopropertypeople.com Subject: Neighbor addresses needed -5343 N Maplestone Hi Kevin, My client Elisabeth Songe is about to close on a new home at 5343 N Maplestone, Meridian 83646. Elisabeth intends to re-establish her childcare business there, and I'd like to get ahead of the game on scheduling their neighborhood meeting, etc. Could you please email me names and addresses of the homeowners she will need to invite to her neighborhood meeting? Thank you! Jenny Hay Project Manager Refugee Childcare Business Development 1607 W Jefferson Street :: Boise, ID 83702 208-947-4262 :: ihay(@_iannus.orq eoiannus.org ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY e4 Y j A .j, 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 26 of 113 Privacy Notice: This message from JANNUS, Inc. and any attachments are intended only for the personal and confidential use of the addressee or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, are not a named recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, do not deliver, distribute or copy this transmission, disclose its contents or take any action based on the information it contains. If you have received this communication in error, notify us immediately at 208.336.5533 and delete the message and any attachments from your system. 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 27 of 113 Jenny Hay From: Jenny Hay Sent: Saturday,April 4, 2020 8:34 AM To: Roger Howell Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Inquiry re: Neighborhood meeting invite from Elisabeth Songe Hi Roger, Thank you for this. I mis-typed in my inquiry below; I meant to say I mailed the neighborhood meeting invitation to you in early November 2019 (not March). Please excuse the repeat request but do respond to confirm that it was November (around the 8th or 9th) when you received the invitation in the mail. Best, Jenny Hay, Project Manager Refugee Childcare Business Development Jannus Economic Opportunity (208)947-4262 From: Roger Howell<themortgageboss@gmail.com> j 3 -7 iV Ma ple sW)L Sent: Friday,April 3, 2020 6:01 PM ' To:Jenny Hay<Jhay@jannus.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Inquiry re: Neighborhood meeting invite from Elisabeth Songe Hi Jenny, I did receive the notice in the mail for the neighborhood meeting. i did not attend the meeting, as 1 have no objections to my neighbors having a day care business. From what I've seen, there have been zero issues in my neighborhood as a result of their business. If you need anything else, let me know. Roger On Fri, Apr 3, 2020, 4:46 PM Jenny Hay <Jhaynao jannus.org> wrote: Dear Roger, I appreciate your taking my phone call today. As I stated previously, your neighbor Elisabeth Songe (5343 N Maplestone) is my client and in November, I assisted her with applying for an Accessory Use Childcare permit. One requirement for the permit application was to hold a neighborhood meeting for property owners within 100' of Elisabeth's property line. As your property falls within this range, I drafted and mailed an invitation to you at 5337 N Maplestone on 11/7/2019. That mailing both described the nature of Elisabeth's Accessory Use proposal and invited you to a neighborhood meeting scheduled on 11/21/2019 at 6:00 pm. Please reply to this email to confirm whether or not you received this invitation in early March, and any subsequent decision whether to attend the meeting. If you have questions, please call me at (406)451- 3208. 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 28 of 113 Thank you! Jenny Hay, Project Manager Refugee Childcare Business Development Jannus Economic Opportunity (208)947-4262 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 29 of 113 Jannus Economic Opportunity 1607 W. Jefferson St. Boise, ID 83702 h eopanml .org If i l� �7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 30 of 113 November 7, 2019 Subject: Neighborhood meeting for Elisabeth Songe family childcare Dear Neighbors, I am interested in establishing a family childcare within my home at 5343 N Maplestone Ave, where I will serve no more than six children under age 13 (including my own). I would like to provide an opportunity for my neighbors to ask questions or learn more about my childcare plans. So, I will be hosting an informational gathering at my new home on ill 2,07 at 6,-30 FM . If you are unable to attend but do have questions, please contact my husband Didier at (208)789-8687. I've also included some basic information below. How do Family Child Care Homes operate? Although I will determine my own program services, hours (within Meridian code), parent fees, etc, most family child care programs operate weekdays from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Since parents' work schedules differ, children may arrive over a period of two hours in the morning and leave during a similar period in the late afternoon. My husband will provide transportation for some children. This will reduce the number of vehicles likely to stop at our home at one time. Parents are encouraged to escort children safely to and from cars to the home. While children are in my care, I will be responsible for their supervision at all times, including indoor activities, outdoor play, and on walks or vehicle trips away from my home. I anticipate outdoor play time to be limited to one hour after 9 am and one hour after 1 pm, and noise will be kept below the maximum stipulated by Meridian officials. Thank you, Elisabeth Songe If you need further information or assistance, please contact: Meridian Planning Department: (208) 489-0573 (regarding neighborhood impact issues) dahoSTARS: 800-926-2588 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 31 of 113 Jenny Hay From: Jenny Hay Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 3:11 PM To: Crystal -MGM Cc: kuzindila2004@gmail.com Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] RE:Jump Creek Subdivision HOA info Great—thank you Crystal. Even with just the small (6 or fewer) accessory use daycare, Meridian does require a planning and zoning permit application for approval,which includes contacting property owners within 100 feet and hosting a discussion meeting, submitting a narrative, a fire inspection, etc. I've worked with the city several times before and am confident helping Elisabeth with the permit application AND helping her(and her husband, CCed here) understanding the permit parameters per Unified Development Code. Elisabeth's neighborhood meeting, per code, will be Thursday 11/21,then we'll submit all the permit application docs to the city. The small childcares my clients operate are somewhat unique in that many provide transportation for their clients (including Elisabeth) which prevents any potential parking concerns or noise in the street/driveway. If any of the relevant property owners have questions,they have already received an invitation that includes a brief narrative, Didier and Elisabeth's contact info, my contact info,and the Meridian P&Z department contact. Best, Jenny Hay Project Manager Refuqee Childcare Business Development 1607 W Jefferson Street :: Boise, ID 83702 208-947-4262 :: ihay(a),iannus.orq eoiannus.orq ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY ey JAMMU% Privacy Notice: This message from JANNUS, Inc. and any attachments are intended only for the personal and confidential use of the addressee or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, are not a named recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, do not deliver, distribute or copy this transmission, disclose its contents or take any action based on the information it contains. If you have received this communication in error, notify us immediately at 208.336.5533 and delete the message and any attachments from your system. From: Crystal-MGM [mailto:Crystal@gomgm.com] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 2:55 PM To:Jenny Hay<Jhay@jannus.org> Cc: kuzindila2004@gmail.com Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] RE:Jump Creek Subdivision HOA info Jenny, i Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 32 of 113 Please refer to Section 3 below.You should be okay please make sure you check with the city for required permits. Section 3. 1 lome Occupations. Assuming all governmental laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances are complied with, home occupations may be conducted from the interior of Dwellinb Units provided such home occupations do not increase the burdens on the streets within the Property (including increased traffic), ll'the Board determines, in its sole and absolute discretion,that a home occupation is increasing the burden on the streets,the Board shall have the right to terminate any Owner's ability to conduct a 1101110 Occupation frorn his or her Dwelling Unit. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Declarant m y conduct any business operation it sees fit from any portion of the Property owned by it,regardless of the impact on the streets. Thank you, Crystal Account Manager POB 1246 Meridian,ID 83680 crystal@gomgm.com www.gomgm.com (208)846-9189 office (208)955-2675 fax MGM Expertise. Experience.Accountability How was our service? Please let us know by leaving a positive review. From:Jenny Hay Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 2:48 PM To:Crystal -MGM <Crystal@gomgm.com> Cc: kuzindila2004@gmail.com Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] RE:Jump Creek Subdivision HOA info Hi Crystal, appreciate your prompt response. Elisabeth does not plan to alter the exterior of her property in anyway—no signs, structures, or any other item visible to neighbors(her realtor told me a standard subdivision fence will be in place in a week based on the developer's plan). Based on the first question/answer on the attached document, it sounds like the board does not require any form from Elisabeth. 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 33 of 113 Please let me know your thoughts—thanks! Jenny Hay Project Manager Refuqee Childcare Business Development 1607 W Jefferson Street :: Boise, I D 83702 208-947-4262 :: jhayCcr�lannus.org eoiannus.orq ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY sY 1A%NuS Privacy Notice: This message from JANNUS, Inc. and any attachments are intended only for the personal and confidential use of the addressee or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, are not a named recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, do not deliver, distribute or copy this transmission, disclose its contents or take any action based on the information it contains. If you have received this communication in error, notify us immediately at 208.336.5533 and delete the message and any attachments from your system. From: Crystal-MGM [mailto:Crystal@gomgm.com] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 2:36 PM To:Jenny Hay<Jhav@iannus.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE:Jump Creek Subdivision HOA info Jenny, I have attached an ACC form, please fill out and send back over to us. We will send it over to the board, once we get a response from them (we typically ask 2-3 weeks) it just depends how quickly they get back to us.Typically they respond sooner. Thank you, Crystal Account Manager POB 1246 Meridian,ID 83680 crystal@gomgm.com www.gomgm.com (208)846-9189 office (208)955-2675 fax MGM Expertise. Experience.Accountability How was our service? Please let us know by leaving a positive review. 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 34 of 113 From:Jenny Hay Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 10:46 AM To: Crystal-MGM <Crystal@gomgm.com> Subject:Jump Creek Subdivision HOA info Hi Crystal, My client Elisabeth Songe just closed on a home in the Jump Creek Subdivision. I support refugee childcare providers, including Elisabeth, through business technical assistance and training to start and maintain small childcares(6 children or less). Elisabeth is a Swahili speaker,which is why she is not initiating this contact. I need a Jump Creek HOA contact to let them know that Elisabeth is planning to submit an accessory use permit app soon for an in-home family childcare. It looks like the HOA is currently managed by the developer CBH Homes—should I call them directly? Thanks, Jenny Hay Project Manager Refugee Childcare Business Development 1607 W Jefferson Street :: Boise, ID 83702 208-947-4262 :: jhayCa�iannus.org eoiannus.org re- ECONOMIC am OPPORTUNITY 6T 1AFiiV1 Privacy Notice: This message from JANNUS, Inc. and any attachments are intended only for the personal and confidential use of the addressee or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, are not a named recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, do not deliver, distribute or copy this transmission, disclose its contents or take any action based on the information it contains. If you have received this communication in error, notify us immediately at 208.336.5533 and delete the message and any attachments from your system. 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 35 of 113 .... JumP Creek Subdivision >; PO Box 1246 Meridian,ID avww.goMGM,com 83680 ����`� Phone:208-846-9189 =: �{ Fax:208-955-2675 Elisabeth Songe&Didia.v._:_., 5343 N Maplest n - ""`°wiia 'a Meridian, 46 Ave ID 836 RE:Architectural Submittal for 5343 N Account#:44527 '>> Maplestone Ave December 17,2019 - Dear Elisabeth Songe&Didier Kuzindila, The Architectural Review Committee for Jump F— a in home business at your residence.In this case,the busirnaco r as reviewed and APPROVED ,,..i hours between 7a— Q.�_._ Your-ACC ranilo�rr ..,• r Ntn,has been review - "" 1111%an in home da care commiiniry in et- ed and found±o have a minirnai impact on the surrounding homes and the 6=Ilerai and shall be allowed as long as there are no negative impacts;noise or traffic complaints for`example. Please follow the plans you have submitted in your request and apply for permits t Provides direction and a that the City may require.The ARC approval hOM based 's neighborhood CCR's and does not review projects for building code requirements or city ordinances. It is the homeowner's responsibility to coordinate all permits,city plan reviews,and t o ensure all work is done in compliance with applicable codes,ordinances,and statutes. Your patience and cooperation with the architectural review process is a i contact the association at www.goMGM.com. PPre crated.If you have any questions,please A CC approval,of plans shall not constitute a representation,warranty,or guorcntee that such plans and specifications comply with engineering design practices or zoning and building ardinonces,or other governmental agency regulations or restriclions. The ACC shall.ot be responsiblene ring design ig,nor shall its s or oval of any plans or design,be deemed o PProvedfrc,the rma approving such plans and specifications,neither the AAC,the Members thereof,standpoint Association,any Memberathereof,theince r Board of Diretctorsaony By Members thereof,or the Declarant assumes any liability or responsibility therefore or for any deject in the construction or improvement from such plans or < specifications. As provided in the CC&R's neither the ACC,the Association,the Boord of Directors or the Association or any Members thereof,not the Declarant or Developer shall be liable to any Member,Owner,Occupant,or other person cr entity for any damage,loss or prejudice suffered or claimed on account of(1)the approval or disapproval of any plans,drowings,orspecifications,whether ornot defective,or(2)the construction or performance orcl ai ed on . i work whether or nat puts uant to the approved plans,dra win gs,or specifications. Sincerely, Architectural Review Committee for Jump Creek Subdivision PO Box 1246 Meridian, ID 83680 208-846-9189Y www.90MGM.com 1 7 F i y��1 4t. aF Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 36 of 113 k' WI IDIAN --- IDAHO Planning and Zoning Public Hearings Staff Outline and Presentation Meeting Notes: City Counci(914eeting p ri(21, 2020 r 16 ON .1. 1 ■ ■■r■■■ u' 1411 - ■� ■■r■■■ NNIN �'. •' '-ram 111�.1 ' oil I IrJIM iu u'■�:'■ I 1 IIIL1111111111 N-M-M-a -- ti S -- --- �' J11511111■ - _-_-- - yutiiuul' r' T pwi ._: __ L _�iPnlirr i�: -- : :: W�-I mi --- ' _II II11111'- -- .:�-;I 1111111,=I try '■' ��:lilll.11._I 1 - 'R� . i1 1 = •�x71.K�Y1::: L9 III .III il� Y.■ u.uuuu�I I "iii' u�1■ - =: i.�,-g u _ loll: ME IN- ' li= ■ +.1.1.: = .1..1 • '- IL ._. :.Him :.:: milli u�2-. uul. ��:::' uuu 1 �I2 '• I - - :.:. __dun: -=L uul.l . - ■ a _:v ==L_' _ _ _ —'i.J _ _ _ :lug ir �li a1�-�'�r:lllll. �lilll.' .. r{�S��Illllmi� '�Y� 1� -' -f . : .•Its IN _ - NN11111'0111111111 -;1111�-�1111111111 - - • ...' - 1111111E --_----- -= '-� ?=•..�Ilil 11111�ON u ME:IIr� I��■F■ - ■uu1uu u-q' _= =°-=ti.i:ui:i uu".i.= �1 uuu:�.i.■'uuau'ua�.-.--t.:■1uu-1.u-.1 u ul-'•-�-•:-'::•-�:•.-� Ir■ ■ ■■ Imil�Lu.�.1��uuuIuI.w1 u11 u.:=_- �_o.i uii.u„.i-'si.uuI1m..i1i1mi.i.1mi"u.u1_'u1uu1 u1u'u1.1w'•uu1 Mil " uu 1+-.-=-•11u-�111u-.1 1 1u1--'•'}L-.• � �1Y ti 1`•��•, rf� VAIA k 111 )6 w ONION r�.:I.iIr.::: :.•P i�S:I,s '• _ _ :�'f_x• - r #_ - ■ ■■ 1■�4ru.�1� - u . .ii iiii iiiiii ii "u�4uu. ''::�' •. is a_���_—� li..iii am_�QI = a 11■ylll�ll`� - u.a ul INS ONONION �_ IOW "'� �+■+ "� ru- F44gw-ed RFV1SF1) VpdaIed PIanWaited: I`lTT�'a2 20iX 1211K!24119) %gnruyedkyf'Ity ,�peil �n iZ11 �: Hill Propert es DA Modification Development Agreement Modification j. V! .; U-5. W_ - I •e�i-•ri tn ' ..•tn MFF.., 1 CENTURY FARM COMMERCIAL SUBDIVSION L A I� .. Proposed Concept Plan >VFkI1f1NlITY ( iOI[FITiJ�k y 1 4 TO I OMR9eLLNIGi r AC#IT EN"LTHY LIVING �•i HILL'S C _ #1III 11/I*I Iwlw �+ ili SELF-SERVICE STORAGE . RET IL/PROF Oi E510NI L COINNIERCI SS11E NISI t� T gtt FLEVENTAR SCHOOL — I V" C!TY Y P.AIIK i ARY. r .T'` INDEPENDEM LIVI+ I'IEIl1. �CERTIM GLE]0 �� I ! TOWER 3,40 . ] [ .... VERANDA All '4 1 _. 1..y - ASSISTED ; d /� PqPT WWIS[F II WRV FARM IS41dDnUT'S1ION � �1�1�E� � L - LIVING :.. y AGE QuAki I Existing Concept t Plan I EST TE t M LOT:S a( Hillsdale - — city park +. r _�X ImC I ONVE ALLDT I� 5dal n lftws CENTURY FARM NORTH October30,2019 CONCEPTUAL-SUBJECT TO CHANGE ! Proposed Zoning W . RA C7 *. i cm #N_ - - AVX I L Rml m -Rm-15 ., r IT7 "! M . . y ; Hillsdale City Park f `~ ymC f Baal .. IILI ' CENTURY NORTH ZONING `-'� E I TING PROPOSED 4W m Preliminary Plat Landscape Plan (revised) — — J7 n � � �. . .......:... rm NO. y O OO O p ii I ® ❑ I ane] OC�.RiL\W1 CILti'!IL[] 00.iM1QILCWKIW II �I yy E: � 'Ell o 0 0 �o ._ ,----- -- ---- --- - — ---- w'.uuanxas YL 4J I as .............. w MM {f u � r'.IIILl]V Rf uL n-Y J _ fl E xk rwlLu �y „ - a -- F 4�" ---_----_ For 11 LS 1 DQ Halo RIO " / ."'' 9 �1!! �� '•� � •'�tin]I n. � IaNAfOI1 LTi£ O O Q ] e 4�0 o � r . . umelalau mall } ; :�y{ xLLS('4MI�1.FilY I XLLS OITIrt IMA X : 91eoIma0N.�0.] I wIDW laW] Qualified Open Space HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH OPEN SPACE EWBIT OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS '�IL a v 9�Irt�•f F-E+ - za.a• ,m>t x°�.��„� =b.w.,tea 4uwFl[oca[xm� 0 � � g REsmwnnxsamxm•asE O O Q LEGEND 0 � � Pvmrvy Iw.w,rs orw s xq OQ O ' oc,xuex�Inw.Ev,uax swcsl li O aD O D O O O Q O O O O O O O O O e COMMON LOT AREAS]RESIDENTIAL NORTH PHASE] Q O 0 S,SNO N AA �'/� 1aER 0.04 IIPII COMMON LOT AREAS{RESIDENTIALSOUTH PHASE} EI Ipr Q d attx wr s xrn isn °�,cfo ox. oFlm E �6jI O _uuv ao fx .. � s rwrrtn swv ,� d9�.fe COMMO N LOT AREAS ICO M M ERCIAL P HASE) Q •: .,. ._, suck i wr i z�IsfA yrc�f`-°'Fl� ] O � Q d v,•va,� ,?� a a ,a am xx"e axliea u " �A•4 —'6 P"'w'W6— ——— — I• ,saws °arm °Re vcx cF are xRrun smu Flrolw s°'Of°wrE O D 0 C) ° R a P Fl sue:onwon rw.x PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSIRDLTIDN OPEN SE EXHIBIT ofvEEorEwormEE HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH i�50Ff°*ao OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT u,s.ca MERIDIAN,IDAHO KM �l}Nb.5 �h4 °turtxE.^, x' s+ Su,c1.A ® EET EIO. Lx1-o U; a Proposed Residential Setbacks U_ 0 y for Cadence PUD �' W OALRYMPLELN I h f I IL f, � . 1 - z � O E.HILL UDC Dimensional Standards (R-15): Q = oo PARK LN - J Street setbackl to garage (in feet): a ILL C 0 Local 20 Collector 25 + — Alley 5 Lu E3J Street setback' to living area (in feet): ~ ,1 Local 10 Collector 20 . r = EXISTING RESIDENCE Alley 5 W.ROCKHAMPTON ST AND OUTBUILDING - Lu S . Interior side setback (in feet) 3 Rear setback (in feet) 12 _ Y `l I N HOME I LOT TYPES: FRONT: GARAGE: SIDE: STREET SIDE: REAR: Proposed TRADITIONAL - ALLEY GARAGE 4-0" 61-0" 1-0" 61-0" 61-0" Deviations: TRA DITIONAL - ALLEY PARR SIC)P 51-0'1 6-0" 41-011 6-0" 64-0° PATIO - FRONT GARAGE 10'-0" 20'-G" 4'-0„ 61-0" 1 101, STANDARD - FRONT GARAGE 15'-41" 20'-0" 51-011 151-01P 1 "-0" ATTACHED HOMES SETBACKS ARE TQ BE MEASURED Pf OM BACK OF BIDE WALK Proposed Conceptual Elevationsfor Cadence - PUD I I •�•: I tee_ _ '�' _ �r�. •• lu 1 1 �y ��- ii�� •`�' I �1�[�J Ii l�l�wl�l�li �.,.� •�` uu np ror uu nu un �ru r�rr � �,..■■■ � d I—i—f—i—I Ii-11—i—I �����■ _;� , ��� I, ���� � . I f P IIII IIIIIII1�111111111 — •�— � —���. .. , -�� __ �� •� ll � �II�I�I 111�I�I111�1111111 �__ ����� — ��r�f�l�l � �Il�lll �—I� 1�1®ICI I■i■I■i■11■i■I■i■I .� �� •: �� �YYYYYYi� J� �- i ... ... auu u.ua - TYPICAL PATIO ELEVATION �Ir F� L =I- i i■ `11111/11111+11111 fir..:. ' '� 4�i.��■ R'• ...__.._ i . -. .� �-T!� 111 I:LI I �i�Y.■��rl F, _ ! 1 ■ •�•�•�••i .uiir •.� YYY__ _ i _ ■ y LEVATI ON -i--�--i�iiii■�■ ��iiiiir�ii���- 11 � � Ills gill MORON H11 _ �i i�iii i��i i�i:� ���i ii i�i i i��■- ■� NOW �� �IIIIIII��IIIII� II�II f ii l 1:� . INS 11 ■■ 11 III � i� �� � LWOW I Conceptual Elevations for Storage Facility Avl q --1 - ......- -.-......... . d JISO �r�� ERAd RUMON -------------� ------ --- — — — — — — Illr.rr 2 M LYFFMIEFMMON Inr.rr Y ALA g1!,+¢-rr YNALLREVATION O a d y - �61LIIC4 RFlRI M[lAL U.4R LR]N6 +J �WIGMIM SIYGSTNSM 6YISSl9l�A�A.IYrICA: .lN1�SLUYRSr * A_ .LIII aoLd!Rm a,1rY1 ran�MrnT rlwcwrn .ua¢wllnxLLULl:�uma NCAI{R4M8 R4LR: Tlu SICf[MRll A'LIUYGC9RVC6 F _ w1LLXll4r 1�IN[%S IO S10W SICfi AfSVIMALL WSa���I"I �__ Id'VL7lIICJI;RlhTAi ��yl MCAl4lCC]rAR6 f 'I l �~ I!D@ cOV4ALL aEVAM N-�EfAJL Y'li:; r 1 FAMY LOWM EHTFY Ni Fly OV37.1 1'ATIOh-FEATJ4E F,22&5 7Ff:- Overall Site Plan - � � HILL'S CFCNTIJW FARM * RETAIL/PROFESSIONAL i SELF-SERVICE STORAGE OFFICE CGMMERCI SUB IVISI4N ' INDEPENDENT LIVING CELL ` Woof VO 1 - ' TOWER VERANDA ASSISTED I� I SAD E N E I . LIVING - a ` n GE ORALIFIED r� G) ESTATE _ ' LOTS ,r Hillsdale . City Park MC CONVEN"ALLOTS P, k it sdal00 Ir HILL'S C iITLLRY F M SiVgll -Iv - N � - Q D HILL'S CENTuRy FARM NORTH rn r October 30, 2019 CONCEPTUAL-SUBJECT TO CHANGE `�� :r � � ]} Design Guidelines https://weblink.meridiancity,org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=186427&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity Commerc *ial DeSIRn 0 Fa ades. Articulated to provide visual integrity of the material . Wall planes are broken up using material joint lines, reveals and/or material banding . * Rooffines . Modulated to provide variation in height and show consistency through flat or low-sloped planes . 0 Entrances. Overhangs have been provided at the primary entrances . 0 Materials. Sustainable material selections are represented using masonry, cement panel siding, stucco, metal and glazing. here masonry is used the material is designed to wrap the corners. to convey an appearance of mass. Accent material is used in conjunction with the main materials to break up the fa ade planes and provide visual interest. • Colors. Subtle, neutral tones that are complimentary to other commercial buildings . r Cadence =� Independent { _ Living Senior Living �. 6280 - -- s St Luke's ? the 1�5 6 I p' -„ =z+ro Mx•.. ;��• .� WEPOWEREl7. r•ar�ra.�e�N-ry!Jf!!�,, - n MP s } �1���1��1lIlFlli,IIIIII 11". IikL � r+ ch: �i bP PRO �i 1-N Changes to Agenda: • Item#51): Lupine Cove—Applicant requests continuance to April 28t"as the site wasn't posted in accord with UDC standards for this hearing. Item#5E: Hill's Century Farm North(H-2019-0134) Application(s): • DA modification • Rezone • Preliminary plat • Planned unit development • Conditional use permit • Private streets (doesn't require Council action;approved by Director) • Alternative compliance (doesn't require Commission action;approved by Director) Size of property,existing zoning,and location: This site consists of 43 acres of land,zoned R-8&C-N, located off the SEC of E. Amity Rd.&S. Eagle Rd. History: This project was annexed in 2015 with a DA; two amendments to the DA have been approved. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: MU-N Summary of Request: •* Modification to the existing DA for Hill's Century Farm Commercial to update the conceptual development plan and certain provisions of the agreement to allow for the development of a self-service storage facility and retail/professional office uses where medium density SFR uses are currently approved consistent with the MU-N FLUM designation. • *Rezone of a total of 39.9 acres of land from the R-8 zoning district to the C-N (4.9 acres), C-C(4.35 acres),and R-15 (30.65 acres)zoning districts consistent with MU-N FLUM designation. • *Preliminary plat consisting of 147 building lots and 18 common lots on 43.02 acres of land in the R-8, R-15,C-N and C-C zoning districts; 0 4 phases of development are proposed with the residential portion proposed to develop in one phase—the storage facility is proposed to develop first. o Access is proposed via(1) public streets from both S. Eagle Rd. &E.Amity Rds. Gated private streets are proposed for security purposes with alleys and common driveways for internal access to the attached&detached units within the north phase of development(i.e.Cadence). 0 25'wide landscaped street buffers are required along Eagle&Amity Rds*A minimum of 10%qualified open space is required to be provided within the residential portion of the development—16.4% is proposed, not including landscaped parkways which also qualify,exceeding the minimum standards.A minimum of 2 qualified site amenities are required—a clubhouse,swimming pool,segments of the multi-use pathway system,an outdoor activity complex with amenities TBD in the future are proposed,exceeding the minimum standards. • PUD for an age-restricted 55 and older gated community is proposed with a variety of housing types and setbacks unique to the unit&site design. Deviations from certain development standards are proposed, including the following: o Setbacks for the R-15 district as shown; alleys designed so that the entire length is visible from a private street rather than a public street;and allowance of a through lot for the existing Hill home. o Off-street parking is proposed in accord with UDC standards;due to the width of the private streets, on-street parking is only allowed on one side of the streets.An extra 30 spaces are proposed in the central portion of the development next to the community center which can accommodate guest parking in addition to on-street parking. o*onceptual elevations for the proposed single-level attached patio homes and detached alley-accessed homes were submitted as shown. -.*Conditional use permit for a 73,730 square foot 443-unit self-service storage facility on 3.89 acres of land in the C-C zoning district; o Access is proposed via a driveway from Amity on the east side of the site which will also provide access to the commercial development to the east; an emergency only access is proposed via Amity on the west end of the site. o *Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the storage facility as shown; building materials consist of vertical reveal metal panels with stucco finish,fiber cement panels with metal channel reveals,and typical fascia with stone wall accents.Structures have step-backs for modulation along E.Amity Rd.As noted in the DA modification analysis,the proposed elevations do not demonstrate a cohesive design that is proportion to and blends with the residential buildings within the development as desired in the MU-N FLUM designation.Therefore, Staff is not supportive of the proposed concept elevations. • Private streets for access to the units within the gated community were tentatively approved by the Director as was Alternative compliance to UDC 11-3F-4A.4b to allow 124 units accessed off private gated streets;and to 11-3F-4A.6 to allow 2 common driveways off private streets. Commission Recommendation: Approval Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Mike Wardle, David Turnbull ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: None iv. Written testimony: David Palumbo, Mike Wardle, Brighton Corp. (response to the staff report) v. Key Issue(s): • Would like to see the improvements(i.e. 4-lane roadway expansion)to E.Amity Rd. completed prior to any developments in this area commencing; • Concern pertaining to the adequacy of parking proposed for the development; Key Issue(s)of Discussion by Commission: • Desire for the storage unit structures to have nice design elements(not just metal)due to its location on a prominent corner; • Question as to whether or not proposed dwelling units will be owner-occupied or rental units(answer is there is a section of independent living units next to the assisted living &memory care units that will be rental units for folks transitioning from a Cadence type product or somewhere in between—services will be shared between the assisted living&the independent living); • In favor of this type of use in close proximity to the YMCA and the City park; • Supportive of age-qualified use in this location due to area schools being over capacity; • Suggestion that the Applicant consider an "L"shape for the storage facility that would allow more commercial retail/office uses in front adjacent to Amity Rd.and possibly extend the storage facility further to the east on the back side. Commission Change(s)to Staff Recommendation: None Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: Mike Wardle, Brighton Corp.- response to the Commission recommendation Outstanding Issue(s)for City Council: • The Applicant submitted revised site and landscape plans,and a response to the Commission's recommendation with the following changes requested to DA provisions and/or conditions of approval: o Delete#1a(relating to existing DA provision#5.1g.ii)which states, "The buildings in the retail/professional office area shown on the conceptual development plan shall be arranged to create some form of common, usable area, such as a plaza or green space as desired in Mixed Use designated areas as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan."-while Staff recognizes there is a City park&YMCA nearby,the intent of the provision is for a common usable area to be provided in the commercial area with the commercial buildings surrounding the area—therefore, Staff does not support this change. o Delete conditions#2b,#3c,#10a&#12 pertaining to the requirement of a 10' pathway&associated easement along Eagle&Amity Rds.—the Park's Dept. is ok with deleting these conditions as the pathways aren't depicted on the PMP. o Addition of language to condition#13 that would allow an exception for a building permit to be issued for the community center prior to the private streets receiving final approval—this is a UDC requirement(11-3F-3B.5)that would require approval of alternative compliance to change;or, Council approval as part of the PUD exceptions to code standards. o Modification to DA provision#5.1 e,which requires the existing home (Marty Hill's)to hook up to City water and sewer service within 60 days of services becoming available from the adjacent R-8 zoned property per MCC 9-14A to instead require the home to be hooked up to City services within 60 days of the final platting of the estate lots.—Public Works is amenable to the requested change if Council agrees. o In response to DA provision#5.1g.vi,which states non-residential buildings should be proportional to and blend in with residential buildings,"—Staff recommended revised elevations be submitted for the storage facility to comply with this provision along with concept elevations for the commercial buildings&independent living units that demonstrate a cohesive design that is proportional to&blends with the SFR buildings; or,design guidelines be submitted &included in the DA that demonstrate consistency with this provision prior to the Council hearing. *Rather than revise the elevations for the storage facility,the Applicant opted to submit design guidelines for the commercial portion of the development with photos of existing structures and concept elevations for the future dental office, storage facility*SFR units(cadence), independent living units and senior living facility.Staff has reviewed these guidelines&elevations and while the commercial elevations are all very consistent in design as are the residential elevations separately,they do not blend with each other so far as sharing similar design elements other than they are mostly proportional in height,which doesn't entirely meet the intent of this requirement. Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff,applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2019-0134,as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 21,2020: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff,applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2019-0134,as presented during the hearing on April 21,2020,for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2019-0134 to the hearing date of for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s)for continuance.) �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 5.D. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item - Public Hearing for Lupine Cove (H-2019-0133) by Penelope Constantikes, Riley Planning Services, Located at 4000 N. McDermott Rd. Click Here for Application Materials Council Notes: ATTACHMENTS: Planning and Zoning Minutes Minutes 3/31/2020 REVIEWERS: Clerk. Johnson, Chris Approved 4/17/2020 -2:11 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 37 of 113 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 5.E. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: Title of Item - Public Hearing for Hill's Century Farm North (H-2019-0134) by Martin L. Hill, Hill & Hill Properties, Located at the Southeast Corner of S. Eagle Rd. and E.Amity Rd. Click Here for Application Materials Click Here to Sign Up to Testify at Hearing Council Notes: AEM&Lmm ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report Staff Report 4/20/2020 Planning and Zoning Minutes Minutes 3/31/2020 REVIEWERS: Department Clerk. Johnson, Chris Approved 4/17/2020 - 3:36 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 54 of 113 STAFF REPORT C�I w IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING April 21,2020 Legend DATE: 0 Project 1_4=fior TO: Mayor&City Council Flu _ ' FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 ffil 1 Bruce Freckleton,Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2019-0134 Hill's Century Farm North - LOCATION: Southeast corner of S. Eagle Rd. and E. -- Amity Rd., in the SW '/4 of Section 33, T.3N.,RJE " I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant requests approval of the following applications: • Modification to the existing development agreement for Hill's Century Farm Commercial(H- 2018-0127, Inst. #2019-033207)to update the conceptual development plan and certain provisions of the agreement to allow for the development of a self-service storage facility and retail/professional office uses where single-family residential uses are currently approved; • Rezone of a total of 39.9 acres of land from the R-8 zoning district to the C-N(4.9 acres), C-C (4.35 acres),and R-15 (30.65 acres)zoning districts; • Preliminary plat consisting of 147 building lots and 18 common lots on 43.02 acres of land in the R-8,R-15, C-N and C-C zoning districts; • Planned unit development for an age-restricted 55 and older gated community with deviations from certain development standards; • Conditional use permit for a 73,730 square foot 443-unit self-service storage facility on 3.89 acres of land in the C-C zoning district; • Private streets for access to single-family attached and detached units in a gated development; and, • Alternative compliance to UDC 11-3F-4A.4b to allow 124 units accessed off private gated streets; and to 11-3F-4A.6 to allow 2 common driveways off private streets. Page 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 55 of 113 II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 43 Existing/Proposed Zoning R-8(Medium-Density Residential)and C-N (Neighborhood Business) Future Land Use Designation MU-N(Mixed Use—Neighborhood) Existing Land Use(s) Vacant/agricultural land,(2)single-family homes and a cell tower Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family residential,self-service storage facility and retail/office Lots(#and type;bldg./common) 147 buildable lots/18 common lots Phasing Plan(#of phases) 4 phases(2 residential&2 commercial) Number of Residential Units(type 137 single-family attached and detached of units) Density(gross&net) 4.07 units/acre(gross);7.28 units/acre(net) Open Space(acres,total 5.55 acres(16.4%) [%]/buffer/qualified) Amenities 2 amenities required;a clubhouse,swimming pool, segment of the multi-use pathway system,and outdoor activity complex(specific amenities in this area are to be determined at CZC review o the clubhouse)are proposed Physical Features(waterways, None hazards,flood plain,hillside) Neighborhood meeting date;#of November 14,2019; 5 attendees(see sign-in sheet attendees: included in application) History(previous approvals) CPAM-15-001,AZ-15-004(DA#2015-061375);H-2016- 0092(MDA#2016-119080);H-2018-0087(CUP for cell tower);H-2018-0127(MDA-2"d Addendum to DA #2019-033207) B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Yes(a Traffic Impact Study was not required) • Requires ACHD No Commission Action (yes/no) Access Access is proposed from the west via S.Eagle Rd. (W.Rockhampton (Arterial/Collectors/State St.)and from the north via E.Amity Rd. (S. Tavistock Ave.),both Hwy/Local)(Existing and arterial streets; from the south via S.Wayland Ave.,a local street;and Proposed) from the east via Hill Park St. Traffic Level of Service Better than"E"(Acceptable level of service for a 2-lane principal/minor arterial is"B") Stub Stub streets are proposed to be extended into this site from the south Street/Interconnectivity/Cros boundary(S.Wayland Ave.)and from the east boundary(Hill Park St.— s Access _ approved but not yet constructed) Existing Road Network None Existing Arterial Sidewalks/ None Buffers Proposed Road Amity Rd.:Widen pavement to 17' from centerline&construct 5' Improvements detached sidewalk 36' from centerline Page 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 56 of 113 Description Details Page Eagle Rd.:Widen pavement to 17' from centerline&construct 5' detached sidewalk 41' from centerline Distance to nearest City Park Hillsdale City Park is in the development process at the project's east (+size) boundary Fire Service • Distance to Fire Station 1.8 miles • Fire Response Time 3:00 minutes(under ideal conditions)from Station#4 • Resource Reliability 78%-does not meet the target goal of 80%or greater • Risk Identification 1 and 3-current resources would be adequate to supply service the proposed project • Accessibility Meets all required access,road widths&turnarounds • Special/resource needs Aerial device not required • Water Supply Residential requires 1,000 gallons/minute for one hour; Storage requires 1, ons/minute for two hours Police Service • Distance to Police 4 miles Station • Police Response Time Priority 3 3:48 Priority 1 7:09 Priority I 10:42 • Calls for Service 257(in RD `M779') • %of calls for service %of P3 US 0.78% split by priority %of P2 US 51.75% %of PI CFS 37.74% %of PO US 9.73% • Crimes 14(in RD `M779') • Crashes 6(in RD `M779') West Ada School District • Distance(elem,ms,hs) Enrollment capacity i es Dew,to schoo • Capacity of Schools *Silver Sage Elementary" 307 405 4.6 miles • #of Students Enrolled Lake Hazel Middle School 1085 1000 1.9 miles Mountain View High School 2262 2400 4.1 miles Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Directly adjacent to site Services • Sewer Shed South Black Cat trunkshed • Estimated Project Sewer See application ERU's • WRRF Declining 13.82 Balance • Project Consistent with Yes WW Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impact/Concerns Manholes cannot be located in landscaped areas unless they are located within an access road per City standards provided. Water • Distance to Water Directly adjacent to site Services • Pressure Zone 4 Page 3 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 57 of 113 Description Details Page • Estimated Project Water See application ERU's • Water Quality None • Project Consistent with Yes Water Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns A portion of the proposed 8"water main will need to be upsized to 12". The reason for the 12" size is for future abandonment of the existing 12" in Eagle Road due to avoiding utilities crossing the roundabout at the Amity intersection. C. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend � Leg-end i 0 Pro"ec- Lxa-or lei Project Lacafon AWUiurn Densely - ideRtlal uLJ W id till udhu+� LdV iden ial Zoning Map Planned Development Map Legend RU! R 0 Legend Pro"ea Lcca=or ,ys.R.;- RU letProjec:-r liar +_i City Limit - 3R-- 78 —iilw. — Planned Pume s R- RUT R HE -C � RS, T RUT RUT RUT R= R- � I � RUT RUTrR R . _R- ..AFAR RUT a Page 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 58 of 113 Note: The subject property also includes a 172'x 709'+1-remnant piece of R-8 zoned land on the northern portion of the east side of the site(not included in the selected area on the above maps) that was left out of the preliminary plat for Hill's Century Farm Commercial Subdivision to the east(see zoning map above with arrow pointed toward referenced area). This area was allowed to be included in a future plat with the property to the west(i.e. the subject property). III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Martin L. Hill,Hill& Hill Properties—3625 E. Amity Rd., Meridian, ID 83642 B. Owner: Same as Applicant C. Representative: Michael D. Wardle,Brighton Corporation—2929 W.Navigator Dr.,Meridian, ID 83642 IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Notification published in 2/14/2020 4/6/2020 newspaper Notification mailed to property owners within 300 feet 2/11/2020 4/6/2020 Applicant posted public hearing 3/8/2020 4/8/2020 notice on site Nextdoor posting 2/11/2020 4/8/2020 V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS(Comprehensive Plan) (Note: This project was submitted prior to the new Comprehensive Plan being adopted; therefore, this project will be reviewed under the previous Plan) The Future Land Use Map(FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Mixed Use—Neighborhood(MU-N). The purpose of the Commercial designation is to assign areas where neighborhood-serving uses and dwellings are seamlessly integrated into the urban fabric. The intent is to avoid predominantly single- use developments by incorporating a variety of uses.Land uses in these areas should be primarily residential with supporting non-residential services.Non-residential uses in these areas tend to be smaller scale and provide a good or service that people do not travel far for(approximately one mile) and need regularly. Employment opportunities for those living in the neighborhood are encouraged. Connectivity and access between non-residential and residential land uses is particularly critical in MU-N areas. Tree-lined,narrow streets are encouraged. Developments are also encouraged to be designed according to the conceptual MU-N plan depicted in Figure 3-1 in the Comprehensive Plan. Residential densities should comprise a minimum of 40% of the development area at densities ranging from 6 to 12 units/acre. The majority of the site(more than the minimum 40%) is proposed to development with single-family residential attached and detached homes at a gross density of 4.07 units/acre;the remainder of the site is proposed to develop with non-residential services consisting of a self-service storage facility and commercial retail/office uses. Although multi-family or duplexes aren't proposed as a transition Page 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 59 of 113 between single-family homes and the commercial uses as depicted on the conceptual MU-N plan in the Comprehensive Plan, attached dwellings on smaller lots are proposed along the northern shared boundary. Although Staff would prefer more of a transition in uses in this area,the required 25' wide landscaped buffer on the commercial property and the 6' tall cedar fence proposed along the residential boundary will assist in buffering the residential from the commercial uses. The north phase of the residential area will have narrow(i.e. 29')tree-lined streets. The storage facility will provide a needed service for area residents and the commercial uses should provide employment opportunities and services for residents in the area. Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this application and apply to the proposed use of this property(staff analysis in italics): • "Provide for a wide diversity of housing types(single-family,modular,mobile homes and multi- family arrangements) and choices between ownership and rental dwelling units for all income groups in a variety of locations suitable for residential development."(3.07.03B) The proposed mix of single family attached and detached homes with standard and age qualified (SS+) options will contribute to the variety of housing types available in the City. • "Provide housing options close to employment and shopping centers."(3.07.02D) The proposed development will provide housing options in close proximity to office and commercial uses planned to develop in this area. • "Require open space areas within all development."(6.01.01A) An open space exhibit is included in Section VIII.G that complies with the minimum UDC standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3. • "Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is contiguous to the City."(3.01.0117) The proposed development is currently within the City and urban services can be provided to this development. • "Restrict private curb cuts and access points on collectors and arterial streets."(3.06.02D) One(1)public street access (W. Rockhampton St) is proposed via S. Eagle Rd. and one (1) public street access (S. Tavistock Ave) is proposed via E.Amity Rd. Staff is of the opinion the proposed accesses shown in Section HITE are acceptable unless otherwise restricted by the City Council and/or ACHD. • "Require pedestrian access connectors in all new development to link subdivisions together to promote neighborhood connectivity as part of a community pathway system."(3.03.03B) Detached sidewalks are proposed throughout the development along internal local streets and adjacent to abutting arterial streets (i.e. Eagle Rd. &Amity Rd.). There are no pathway connections to this development from the south except for the sidewalk along the stub street to this property.A pathway stub is proposed to the commercial portion of the development to the north for interconnectivity.A micro path connection is also proposed mid-block at the west boundary of the site connecting to the sidewalk along S. Eagle Rd. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in all Mixed Use areas,per the Comprehensive Plan(pgs.23-24): (Staffs analysis in italics) • "Residential densities should be a minimum of six dwellings/acre." The gross density for the overall residential portion of the development is 4.07 units per acre with a net density of 7.28 units per acre, which is consistent with the density range in the Development Agreement of 4 to 8 units/acre (net)previously approved for this project. Page 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 60 of 113 • "Where feasible,higher density and/or multi-family residential development will be encouraged, especially for projects with the potential to serve as employment destination centers and when the project is adjacent to US 20/26, SH-55, SH-16 or SH-69." Medium density single-family residential uses are proposed; this project is not adjacent to a State Highway although it is within a mile of E. Lake Hazel Rd., a mobility corridor. • "A conceptual site plan for the entire mixed-use area should be included in the application." A conceptual development plan was submitted for the proposed mixed use development, included in Section VIII.C. • "In developments where multiple commercial and/or office buildings are proposed(not residential),the buildings should be arranged to create some form of common,usable area, such as a plaza or green space." Staff recommends the future buildings in the retaiUprofessional office area are arranged in accord with this provision. To ensure future consistency with this provision,Staff recommends a concept plan for that overall area is submitted prior to the City Council hearing that demonstrates how this will be accomplished. • "The site plan should depict a transitional use and/or landscaped buffering between commercial and existing low-or medium-density residential development." There are no existing residential uses, only proposed residential uses, adjacent to the commercial portion of the development; a minimum 25'wide dense landscape buffer landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-9C will be required on the commercial property with development. • "A mixed-use project should include at least three types of land uses [i.e. commercial(includes retail,restaurants, etc.), office,residential, civic(includes public open space,parks,entertainment venues, etc.),and industrial]. Exceptions may be granted for smaller sites on a case-by-case basis." The proposed development will include a mix of residential, commercial retail, office, and industrial(storage units) uses as desired. • "Community-serving facilities such as hospitals,churches, schools,parks, daycares, civic buildings, or public safety facilities are expected in larger mixed-use developments." Medical offices (St. Luke's), a City Park(Hillsdale), the YMCA and an elementary school (Hillsdale) all exist within % mile to the east of this site. • "Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks,plazas, outdoor gathering areas,open space, libraries, and schools are expected; outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count." A City Park abuts the east boundary of this site and an elementary school, YMCA and small library is on the east side of the park.A site plan is not included for the retail/office portion of the development. The Applicant should design this area with buildings arranged to create some form of common, usable area,such as a plaza or green space in accord with this provision. • "All mixed-use projects should be directly accessible to neighborhoods within the section by both vehicles and pedestrians." The commercial portion of the development will be accessible to the residential neighborhood by vehicles via a local public street; a pedestrian connection is proposed at the north boundary of the residential area to the commercial area. • "Street sections consistent with the Ada County Highway District Master Street Map are required within the Unified Development Code." The Master Street Map does not depict any streets across this property. Page 7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 61 of 113 • "Because of the existing small lots within Old Town, development is not subject to the Mixed- Use standards listed herein." The proposed development is not within Old Town; therefore, this provision is not applicable. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in MU-N areas, per the Comprehensive Plan(pg. 25): (Staffs analysis in italics) • "Development should comply with the items listed for development in all Mixed Use areas." See previous section and associated analysis. • "Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 40%of the development area at densities ranging from six to 12 units/acre." With the 26 independent living units planned to the east of the single-family portion of the development, the overall gross density of the residential area is 4.4 units/acre(7.35 units/acre net), which is below the desired target range of the MU-N designation but within the range listed in the DA of 4 to 8 units/acre (net). • "Non-residential buildings should be proportional to and blend in with residential buildings." Concept elevations submitted for the storage facility while somewhat proportional in height, do not "blend"with the residential buildings in color,materials or design; concept elevations were not submitted for the commercial retail/office or independent living portions of the development. To ensure consistency with this provision in the future,Staff recommends the Applicant make changes to the storage facility elevations to comply with this provision and submit concept elevations for the commercial buildings and independent living units that demonstrate a cohesive design that is proportional to and blends with the single-family residential buildings prior to the City Council hearing. In the alternative, design guidelines may be submitted for the overall development that demonstrate consistency with this provision. • "Unless a structure contains a mix of both residential and office, or residential and commercial land uses,maximum building size should be limited to a 20,000 square-foot building footprint. For the development of public school sites,the maximum building size does not apply." Residential uses are not proposed with the commercial retail and office uses. None of the structures within the storage facility exceed the 20,000 square foot(sf.) building footprint. Future commercial retail/office buildings(without residential uses)should not exceed 20,000 sf. • "Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places such as parks,plazas, outdoor gathering areas, open space, libraries, and schools should comprise a minimum of 10%of the development area. Outdoor seating at restaurants do not count towards this requirement." A City Park, YMCA, and elementary school exist to the east of this site and comprise over 10%of the MU-N designated area. • "Where the development proposes public and quasi-public uses to support the development above the minimum 10%,the developer may be eligible for additional residential densities and/or an increase to the maximum building footprint." Public and quasi public uses have already been developed or are in the development process directly to the east of this site exceeding the minimum 10%. No such increases to density or building footprint are requested. VI. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ANALYSIS UD A. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT MODIFICATION(MDA) A modification to the existing Amended Development Agreement(H-2018-0127,Instrument #2019-033207)is proposed consisting of an update to the conceptual development plan for the Page 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 62 of 113 site and text changes to some of the provisions in Section#5.1 of the agreement as noted in Section VIII.A of this report. The existing approved concept plan depicts a bubble plan for medium density residential, a proposed cell tower,commercial(C-N zoned), elementary school,YMCA, City Park, library, and health center complex uses on the site. The proposed plan still includes these uses but amends the northern portion of the residential area to also include self-service storage and retail/professional office uses; and amends the southern portion of the commercial (C-N zoned)area to also include independent living, and assisted living(see Section VIII.A). The northern portion of the site proposed for storage and commercial uses is proposed to be rezoned from R-8 to C-N and C-C and the portion proposed for independent living is proposed to be rezoned from C-N to R-15 to accommodate the proposed uses. Because the proposed uses are all listed as allowed uses in the applicable zoning districts per UDC Tables 11-2A-2 and 11-2B-2 and are uses that are desired within the MU-N FLUM designation, Staff is supportive of the proposed MDA. The proposed changes to the text of the agreement are noted in strike-out/underline format; Staff's comments in response to the proposed changes are noted in italic text. Staff is supportive of the proposed MDA request. B. REZONE(RZ) A rezone of a total of 39.9 acres of land from the R-8 zoning district to the C-N(4.9 acres), C-C (4.35 acres),and R-15 (30.65 acres)zoning districts is proposed, as depicted on the legal descriptions and associated exhibit maps in Section VIII.B. The proposed rezone and uses in these districts are consistent with the MU-N FLUM designation as discussed above in Section V; the C-C zoning district is requested for the storage facility as such uses are prohibited in the C-N district. The City may require a Development Agreement(DA) in conjunction with a rezone pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. In order to ensure future development as proposed with this application is consistent with the associated design elements of the Mixed Use FLUM designation, staff recommends new DA provisions are added to the proposed amended DA provisions included in Section VIII.A. C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CUP)-SELF-SERVICE STORAGE FACILITY A CUP is proposed for a 73,730 square foot(s.f.)443-unit self-service storage facility consisting of 8 structures ranging in size from 7,075 to 13,709 square feet on 3.89 acres of land in the C-C zoning district in accord with UDC Table 11-2B-2. Development of the facility should be consistent with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-213-3 for the C-C zoning district. A variety of storage unit sizes are proposed ranging from 5' x 5' to 14' x 35' as shown on the schematic site plan in Section VIII.D. One hundred thirty two (132)of the storage units are proposed to be climate controlled. Page 9 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 63 of 113 Specific Use Standards: The proposed use is subject to the following standards: (Staff comments in italics) UDC 11-4-3-34, Self-Service Storage Facility,as follows: A. Storage units and/or areas shall not be used as dwellings or as a commercial or industrial place of business. The manufacture or sale of any item by a tenant from or at a self-service storage facility is specifically prohibited. The Applicant shall comply. B. On site auctions of unclaimed items by the storage facility owners shall be allowed as a temporary use in accord with chapter 3, article E, "Temporary Use Requirements", of this title. The Applicant shall comply. C. The distance between structures shall be a minimum of twenty five feet(25'). The proposed site plan complies. D. The storage facility shall be completely fenced,walled, or enclosed and screened from public view. Where abutting a residential district or public road, chainlink shall not be allowed as fencing material. The perimeter buildings and a 6'tall fence (where no buildings are proposed)will screen the site from public view. E. If abutting a residential district,the facility hours of public operation shall be limited to six o'clock(6:00)A.M.to eleven o'clock(11:00)P.M. The site abuts planned residential uses along the south boundary; the Applicant shall comply. F.A minimum twenty five foot(25')wide landscape buffer shall be provided where the facility abuts a residential use,unless a greater buffer width is otherwise required by this title. Landscaping shall be provided as set forth in subsection 11-3B-9C of this title.A 25'wide landscape buffer is proposed along the southern boundary of the site adjacent to planned residential uses; the buffer should be planted with a mix of materials(i.e. evergreen and deciduous trees,shrubs, lawn or other vegetative groundcover)that results in a barrier that allows trees to touch at maturity—more trees/shrubs should be added to achieve the desired barrier. To prevent incidences of crime in this area that isn't visible from a public street, Staff recommends the area is fenced off from public access in accord with CPTED(Crime Prevention through Environmental Design)guidelines. G. If the use is unattended,the standards in accord with section 11-3A-16, "Self-Service Uses", of this title shall also apply. See standards below. H. The facility shall have a second means of access for emergency purposes.A secondary emergency only access is proposed at the west end of the site via E.Amity Rd. as depicted on the site plan. 1. All outdoor storage of material shall be maintained in an orderly manner so as not to create a public nuisance. Materials shall not be stored within the required yards. Stored items shall not block sidewalks or parking areas and may not impede vehicular or pedestrian traffic. The Applicant shall comply. J. The site shall not be used as a"vehicle wrecking or junk yard" as herein defined. The Applicant shall comply. K. For any use requiring the storage of fuel or hazardous material,the use shall be located a minimum of one thousand feet(1,000)from a hospital.No fuel or hazardous material will be stored on the site. Page 10 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 64 of 113 UDC 11-3A-16, Self-Service Uses, as follows: Any unattended, self-service uses, including,but not limited to,laundromats, automatic teller machines(ATMs),vehicle washing facilities,fuel sales facilities, and storage facilities, shall comply with the following requirements. The Meridian Police Chief or designee may approve alternative standards where it is determined that a similar or greater level of security is provided. A. Entrance or view of the self-service facility shall be open to the public street or to adjoining businesses and shall have low impact security lighting. B. Financial transaction areas shall be oriented to and visible from an area that receives a high volume of traffic, such as a collector or arterial street. C. Landscape shrubbery shall be limited to no more than three feet(Y) in height between entrances and financial transaction areas and the public street. Staff has reviewed these standards and found the proposed plan to be in general compliance with these standards with the recommended conditions. Access: Access to the facility is proposed via a driveway from E. Amity Rd. on the east side of the site;the entry to the facility faces future commercial uses to the east. An emergency only access is proposed via E.Amity Rd. as depicted on the site plan. Common Driveways(UDC 11-6C-3): All common driveways are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. Two(2)common driveways are proposed that comply with UDC standards. An exhibit is required to be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks,fencing,building envelope and orientation of the lots and structures.Driveways for abutting properties that aren't taking access from the common driveway(s) should be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line away from the common driveway. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited unless separated by a minimum 5-foot wide landscaped buffer. A perpetual ingress/egress easement for the common driveway(s)is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment.A copy of the easement should be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat. Signage should be provided at the ends of the common driveways on Lots 19 and 54,Block 1 for emergency wayfinding purposes as requested by the Fire Department. Parking: Off-street parking for the office associated with the storage facility is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-6. Based on 800 square feet for the proposed office, a minimum of one(1) space is required; a total of 4 spaces are proposed in excess of the minimum required. Landscaping: A 25' wide street buffer is required along E. Amity Rd. as set forth in UDC Table 11-2B-3,landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C; the proposed buffer complies with UDC standards. Landscaping is proposed in accord with UDC standards. A 25' buffer to residential uses is also required as discussed above. Sidewalk/Pathway: A detached sidewalk is required along E. Amity Rd., an arterial street,per UDC 11-3A-17C. The Park's Department requests a 10'wide detached multi-use pathway is provided instead of a 5'wide sidewalk. Page 11 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 65 of 113 Hours of Operation: Business hours of operation in the C-C district are limited from 6:00 am to 11:00 pm when the property abuts a residential use or district per UDC 11-2B-3B consistent with UDC 11-4-3-34E. Building size: As discussed above in Section V,the Comprehensive Plan states,building size should be limited to a 20,000 s.f.building footprint if the structure doesn't have a residential component with the office or commercial use;this applies to all future commercial retail/office on the site. The Applicant requested a deviation from this standard for the storage facility; however, none of the individual structures exceed 20,000 square feet,therefore, a deviation from this provision is not necessary. Building Elevations: Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the storage facility structures, included in Section VIII.1. Building materials consist of vertical reveal metal panels with stucco finish, fiber cement panels with metal channel reveals, and typical fascia with stone wall accents. Structures have step-backs for modulation along E. Amity Rd. As discussed above in Section V,the proposed elevations do not demonstrate a cohesive design that is proportion to and blends with the residential buildings within the development as desired in the MU-N FLUM designation. Therefore,the proposed concept elevations are not approved.Revised concept elevations(or design guidelines) should be submitted accordingly prior to the City Council hearing.Final design is required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. Certificate of Zoning Compliance/Design Review: A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application shall be submitted to the Planning Division and approved prior to submittal of building permit applications for the site. Prior to submittal of these applications the property is required to be subdivided. D. PRELIMINARY PLAT The proposed preliminary plat consists of a total of 147 buildable lots (137 residential and 10 commercial)and 18 common lots on 43 acres of land in the R-8,R-15, C-N and C-C zoning districts. A phasing plan is depicted on the plat that reflects four(4)phases of development(see Section VIII.E); however,the residential phase is anticipated to develop in one phase. The storage facility is proposed to develop first. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There is an existing home and accessory structures at the northeast corner of the site that are proposed to be removed with development;these structures should be removed prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat for the phase in which they are located.There is also an existing home and accessory structure that is proposed to remain on Lot 150,Block 1, which complies with the dimensional standards(i.e. setbacks)of the R-8 district listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): All development should comply with the dimensional standards for the applicable district as follows: UDC Tables 11-2A-6(R-8 district); 11-2A-7(R-15 district); and 11-2B-2 (C-N and C-C districts). Design: All subdivisions are required to comply with the subdivision design and improvement standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3C(i.e. streets, alleys,common driveways,block face, etc.). An Page 12 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 66 of 113 exception to UDC 11-6C-3A.1,which prohibits through properties is requested through the PUD (see analysis below). Access(UDC 11-3A-3): Access is proposed on the plat as follows: One(1)public street access(W. Rockhampton St.)via S. Eagle Rd.; one (1)public street access(S. Tavistock Ave.)via E.Amity Rd.; and one shared driveway access for the proposed storage facility and commercial retail/office development via E. Amity Rd. Staff believes the proposed access is consistent with the standards listed in UDC 11- 3A-3. Private streets are proposed for internal access within the North Phase of the development(see analysis below); two(2)common driveways are also proposed off private streets. Private Streets: Private streets are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4. Private streets are not intended for single-family developments other than those that create a common mew through the site design or that propose a limited gated residential development. Private streets are proposed within the North Phase of the development for access to proposed attached and detached units; two(2)gated entries and mews with alley accessed homes are proposed in the central portion of the development. The private street standards restrict development to no more than 50 dwelling units and don't allow common driveways off of a private street. The Applicant requests alternative compliance to UDC 11-3F-4A.4b to allow 124 units accessed off private gated streets; and to 11-3F-4A.6 to allow 2 common driveways off private streets. Requests for alternative compliance are only allowed when one or more of the conditions in UDC 11-5B-5B.2 exist. The Applicant's justification is, "The proposed design includes innovative design features based on"new urbanism,""neotraditional design,"or other architectural and/or site designs that promote walkable and mixed use neighborhoods."The Applicant believes the unique site design of gated,private streets, alleys, and common driveways; and common areas and pathways in combination with the character and diversity of the proposed dwellings achieves the aforementioned objective. Further,the Applicant believes approval of the alternative compliance request will provide a superior means of meeting the requirements of the UDC as is the intent for requests for Alternative Compliance.For these reasons,the Director has approved the Applicant's request for private streets and alternative compliance as it meets the requirements for such a request; see associated Findings in Section X.E and F. The Applicant or Owner shall have one year to complete the tasks listed in UDC 11-3F-3B for final approval of the private streets proposed within the development. No building permit shall be issued for any structure using a private street for access to a public street until the private street has been approved. The Applicant should coordinate with Terri Ricks and Fire Dept.for addressing lots accessed by alleys without frontage on a public street.Address signage for wayfinding purposes should be provided in these areas as well as at the private street for homes accessed by common driveways. Pathways(UDC 11-3A-8): The Park's Dept. requests a 10' wide multi-use pathway is provided within the street buffers in place of sidewalks along S.Eagle Rd. and E.Amity Rd.within a 14'wide public use easement.The pathway should be depicted on a revised plan submitted with the final plat application. Page 13 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 67 of 113 A pathway stub is proposed to the sidewalk along S. Eagle Rd. and to the commercial development to the north,which will extend along the east side of the service driveway adjacent to the commercial retail/office pads to the sidewalk along E. Amity Rd. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-1 : Sidewalks are required to be provided along all streets as set forth in UDC 11-3A-17. Five foot wide detached sidewalks with 8' wide parkways are proposed throughout the development in accord with UDC standards. As noted above, Staff recommends a 10' wide detached multi-use pathway is provided instead of a typical 5' wide sidewalk along S.Eagle Rd. and E.Amity Rd.,as requested by the Park's Dept. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-1 Parkways are required to be constructed and landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17E. Eight-foot wide parkways are proposed with Class II trees adjacent to all streets within the development in accord with UDC standards. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): A 25-foot wide street buffer is required along S. Eagle Rd. and E.Amity Rd.,both arterial streets, per UDC Tables 11-2A-7 and 11-2B-3, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C as proposed. If the unimproved right-of-way is 10' or greater from the edge of pavement to the edge of sidewalk or property line,the developer shall maintain a 10' compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of the transportation authority and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.5; this appears to apply along E.Amity Rd. Parkways are required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17 and II-3B-7C as proposed. Open space areas are required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 1I- 3G-3E as proposed. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited unless separated by a minimum 5'wide landscaped buffer per UDC 11-6C-3D.5.If applicable,depict landscaping in accord with this standard on a revised landscape plan. Qualified Open Space(UDC 11-3 : A minimum of 10%qualified open space is required to be provided for the residential development as set forth in UDC 11-3G-3B. Based on a total of 33.64 acres for the residential area, a minimum of 3.36 acres is required to be provided; a total of 5.5 acres(or 16.4%) is proposed,which exceeds the minimum standards. This calculation does not include 8' wide parkways along internal streets which also qualify toward the qualified open space standards. Qualified Site Amenities(UDC 11-3 Based on 33.64 acres for the residential area, a minimum of two(2)qualified site amenities required; a clubhouse, swimming pool, segments of the multi-use pathway system, and outdoor activity complex(specific amenities in this area are to be determined at CZC)are proposed in excess of the minimum standards. Waterways(UDC 11-3A-6): There are no significant waterways that cross this site other than possibly user ditches.All irrigation ditches crossing the site are required to be piped with development. Page 14 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 68 of 113 Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6,11-3A- • All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC I I-3A-7. Six-foot tall solid stained cedar fencing is proposed(or exists) along the perimeter boundary of the subdivision. Open vision wrought iron fencing and some closed vision fencing is proposed adjacent to internal common areas; fences abutting pathways and common open space that aren't entirely visible from a public street such as on the east side of Lot 107,Block 1,shall be revised to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7A.7.A detail of the open vision wrought iron fence that complies with the standards listed in should be included on a revised landscape plan. Utilities(UDC 11-3A-21): Utilities shall be installed with development in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A- 21. Building Elevations: Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the single-story, single- family attached and detached dwellings in"Cadence",the age restricted 55 and older portion of the development,included in Section VIII.1. Building materials consist of a variety of materials including vertical,horizontal and shake siding and stucco with stoneibrick accents. Conceptual elevations were not submitted for the estate lots in the R-8 district along the southern boundary of the development. Final design of the attached structures is required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. A Design Review application is required to be submitted to the Planning Division and approved prior to submittal of building permit applications for the single-family attached units; all attached structures are required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted for the clubhouse and swimming pool area and approved prior to submittal of a building permit application. The design of the structure is required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. The Applicant requests approval for this area to be constructed prior to subdivision of the property; Staff is amenable to this request. E. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PUD) A Planned Unit Development is proposed to enable the provision of a mix of attached and detached age-qualified 55+dwelling units that incorporate a variety of housing types and setbacks unique to unit and site design. The development is proposed to be gated for security purposes and have private streets, alleys and a common driveway for access to the units within the development. Setbacks: Deviations to the typical R-15 building setback requirements are proposed as noted below; and to UDC 11-6C-3B.5,which requires alleys to be designed so that the entire length is visible from a public street. Although not visible from a public street as public streets aren't proposed within the PUD area,the entire length of the alleys are visible from internal private streets. H0mE r L0T TYVF& FROM Y FLc SIB *Mrr SIMI IMAKI TRADMO,uL-dI i EY Pxax SIDE $'0' C-0' J.4r C-0' r-F FxriO.FiRWT reuzAdE is-o' W-' N47 a43' 1741' STpNRWO-FRONT uOE W-4' W-W Y-W 75'-0' IT4Y c ATTAGHEQ HQf.%--4 MTBV xa 4ME_T*EE MASLf£.0 FR M e00--2F ME WAK Page 15 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 69 of 113 No deviations to the setbacks are requested or approved to the setbacks along the periphery of the planned development in accord with UDC 11-7-4A.1. Through Properties: The UDC(11-6C-3A.1)prohibits through properties except where it is shown that unusual topography or other conditions make it impossible to meet this requirement; through properties shall be limited to one street access on one frontage, designated by a note on the final plat. Lot 150,Block 1,where the existing home is proposed to remain,is a considered a"through"lot as it has frontage on two streets (E.Hill Park Ln.&W. Rockhampton Ct.).As part of the PUD request,the Applicant requests Council approval of an exception to this standard due to the unusual 2.57 acre size of the proposed lot,the northerly orientation and location of the residential structure, and its separation from the detached shop structure 150' to the south to allow access to be provided from both streets (E.Hill Park Ln.for the home and W.Rockhampton Ct.for the shop). Parking(UDC 11-3C-6) Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11- 3C-6 for residential uses,which requires parking pads to be provided in addition to garage parking spaces based on the number of bedrooms per unit(i.e. 1-2 bedroom units require 2 spaces per unit with at least one of those being in an enclosed garage,the other space may be enclosed or a minimum 10' x 20' parking pad; 3-4 bedroom units require 4 spaces per unit with at least two of those being in an enclosed garage,the other spaces may be enclosed or a minimum 10' x 20' parking pad). The standard—front garage and patio—front garage units allow for 20' parking pads but the traditional—alley garage and traditional—alley park side lots do not. alter-native wee-tn-the Off StFeet PftFldHgstandards listed in Unable 1= 3C 6 single family dwellings shall be submitted and approved by the DiFeetor-ffiff to the City Couneil .Two-car gara eg s are proposed for these 2-bedroom units,which comply with the aforementioned parking standards;therefore, alternative compliance is not required. Because 29' wide private streets are proposed within the development, parking is only allowed on one side of the street and should be provided on the street side adjacent to the alley accessed units rather than the patio homes with front accessed garages to allow for more spaces that aren't encumbered by driveways.An extra 30 parking spaces are proposed in the central portion of the development next to the community center which can accommodate guest parking in addition to on-street parking. Analysis of Compliance with PUD Standards (UDC 11-7- The proposed uses within the PUD area are interconnected through a system of private streets and pathways through common areas. Buildings are clustered to enable larger, more usable areas for common use and enjoyment. A minimum of 80 square feet of private, usable open space is required to be provided for each unit; this requirement can be satisfied through porches,patios, decks and enclosed yards as set forth in UDC 11-7-4B. A variety of housing types are proposed consisting of conventional single-family detached homes on estate lots, single-family attached patio homes, traditional detached alley-loaded homes and traditional detached alley park side homes. The residential gross density of the north phase (i.e. age restricted portion) of the development is 4.66 units/acre with a net density of 9.03 units/acre, which is consistent with the Development Agreement provisions for desired density. Page 16 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 70 of 113 VIL DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed DA modification,RZ, PP, CUP and PUD applications; the Director approved the request for ALT and tentatively approved the PS request. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on March 5 and 19, 2020. At the public hearing on March 19',the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject CUP,MDA,PUD,PP and RZ requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing: a. In favor: Mike Wardle,David Turnbull b. In opposition:None c. Commenting None d. Written testimony: David Palumbo; Mike Wardle,Brighton Corporation(in agreement with staff report) e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s) testimony a. Would like to see the improvements (i.e. 4-lane roadway expansion)to E. Amity completed prior to any developments in this area commencing; b. Concern pertaining to the adequacy of parking proposed for the development; 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. Desire for the storage unit structures to have nice design elements(not just metal,) due to its location on a prominent corner; b. Question as to whether or not proposed dwelling units will be owner-occupied or rental units (answer is there is a section of independent living units next to the assisted living &memory care units that will be rental units for folks transitioning from a Cadence We product or somewhere in between—services will be shared between the assisted living&the independent living); c. In favor of this type of use in close proximity to the YMCA and the City park; d. Supportive of age-qualified use in this location due to area schools being over capacity; e. Suggestion that the Applicant consider an"L"shape for the storage facility acility that would allow more commercial retail/office uses in front adjacent to Amity Rd. and possibly extend the storage facility further to the east on the back side. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstandin issue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. The Applicant submitted revised site and landscape plans included in Section VIII, and a response to the Commission's recommendation and requested changes here:Applicant's Response—Staff s related comments are here: Staffs comments b. The Applicant requests Council approval of a modification to DA provision#5.1e, which requires the existing_WgAy Hill's)home to hook up to City water and sewer service within 60 days of services becoming available from the adjacent R-8 zoned propeM per MCC 9-1-4A to instead require the home to be hooked up to City services within 60 days of the final platting of the estate lots. b. In response to Staffs recommendation in DA provision#5.1g.vi in Section V111, the Applicant submitted design guidelines for the commercial and residential buildings within the development,governed by the DA as follows:Design Guidelines Page 17 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 71 of 113 VIII. EXHIBITS A. Existing&Proposed Conceptual Development Plans and Text Changes to Development Agreement Inst.#2019-033207 for Proposed Development Agreement Modification Existing Concept Plan: Pwpesv RFVISEO Vpdafed Plan(dated: 1•'122Q0;9 1211IV201 )Apayk'vd b) t A3 Hill Properties DA Modification .ems. • •'�' CFNTEiRIr FARMCOMMERCIALWsun",IVSI014 iME i1 MEDIUM DEMWTY RF0[MTIAL jj 1.3E"IVF; H.S ✓v'cF - i 1 1 r -HEALTHY LIVING I � sutvsxlsla� ' WESTAVAILEVEMTARTSCM01- }�,�, I INCALCJTY PAR..LIERART. IS._f 1 HEALTH CENTER COMPLFi7 ---------------------------------- FMLR'S[fNlURV FARM S0180P ISION ,,....�.._�.�..,«. Proposed Concept/Bubble Plan: r.<. HILL'S C ftRT--' �j RET ILJPROFESSION L COMMERC SELF-SERVICE STORAGE -- .7 LSU� (VISION OFF(E - � INOEPENOEFJT LNIfr +; M1 VERANDA ASSI5TED -� CAL DEN E LIVING m - _ ESTATE A ,�_'—.' II_ a _ r _ LOTS CD L Hillsdale 49 City Park'Z .F LONVE Vk"AL LCTS sda1. le 2 NI 1SI N � , i .m "! A Q HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH r '+ m DdL.b-30,2019 C6NCEP7UAL-SU9JECTTO CHANGE , �} Page 18 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 72 of 113 Proposed Changes to the Text [pgs. 1-3 of Second Amendment to Development Agreement Inst. #2019-033207(H-2018-0127): (Staffs comments in italics—not to be included in final DA) 1. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall be bound by the terms of the original Development Agreement, except as specifically amended as follows: 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1. Owner/Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. impr-eve S.Hillsdale Avenue as a publie street adjaeent to the east boundary of this site as r-equir- No longer applicable (street has been constructed). b. Business hours of operation in the C-N district shall be limited from 6:00 am to 10:00 pm as set forth in UDC11-2B-3A.4,except for the YMCA which is allowed to operate from 5:00 am to 10:00 pm. The residential care facility use does not violate the limitation on the hours of operation. c. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the amended concept plans dated Deee.v be. ,4 2n i Q October 30,2019 included in the Staff Report attached to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law from the modification to Development Agreement(14 20iz-�v 1 9 01 7H-2019- 0134) attached hereto as Exhibit"A". (Updated per MDA request) d. Future development of this site should include a pedestrian pathway network that links the mixed use area with the residential and the elementary school/YMCA site as well as adjacent off-site properties. Vehicular connections should also be provided for interconnectivity within the site. e. The existing home in the R-8 zoning district that is proposed to remain at the south boundary of the annexation area midway between S. Eagle Road and S. 14ovTY Lane Hillsdale Ave. shall be required to hook up to City water and sewer service within 60 days of services becoming available from the development of the adjacent R-8 zoned property,per MCC 9-1-4A;the existing home that fronts on E. Amity Road that is proposed to be removed with redevelopment of the site and the existing home that fronts on S. Hie Hillsdale Ave. that is proposed to remain in the C-N district as long as the Hill's reside there are not required to hook up to City services. (Street name changed) The Applicant requests Council approval of a modification to this provision to instead require the home (Marty Hill's) in the R-8 district to be hooked up to City services within 60 days of the final platting of the estate lots. £ The rear or sides of homes on lots that face S. Eagle Road and E. ^. m'ty Re shall incorporate articulation through changes in materials,color,modulation,and architectural elements(horizontal and vertical)to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines. (No longer applicable—no homes are proposed along Amity Rd.) g. To ensure future development is consistent with the objectives and vision of the MU-N designation the following items will be considered in reviewing development applications: i. Community serving facilities (i.e. a school,park,YMCA, library,hospitals, churches, daycares,civic buildings, or public safety facilities) should be provided; , l;i..,.ary and.,,.i.00ls) should, o a minimum f i not of the development, o No longer applicable—these areas have been provided with development of the City Park, YMCA and library and elementary school at approximately 20% of the overall development area. Page 19 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 73 of 113 iii. Street sections consistent with the Ada County Highway District Master Street Map are required; iv. Neighborhood serving uses and dwellings should be integrated; V. Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 40%of the development area with net densities ranging from 4 to 8 units per acre with supporting non-residential services. Non-residential uses should be smaller scale and provide a good or service that people typically don't travel more than a mile for and need regularly; vi. Non-residential buildings should be proportional to and blend in with residential buildings; To ensure consistency with this provision in the future, Staff recommends the Applicant make changes to the storage facility elevations to comply with this provision and submit concept elevations for the commercial buildings and independent living units that demonstrate a cohesive design that is proportional to and blends with the single-family residential buildings prior to the City Council hearing. In the alternative, design guidelines may be submitted and included in the DA for the overall development that demonstrate consistency with this provision. The Applicant has submitted desip_n guidelines for City Council's consideration in response to this recommendation at the following link:Design Guidelines vii. Employment opportunities for those living in the neighborhood are encouraged; viii. The mixed use project should be directly accessible to neighborhoods within the section by both vehicles and pedestrians; ix. Planning of the C-N property north of the park and YMCA shall consider appropriate visibility,parking and emergency access to the future neighborhood park. X. Sample uses appropriate in the MU-N area would include: townhouses, multi-family developments, neighborhood grocer, drug stores, coffee/sandwich/ice-cream shops, vertically integrated buildings, live-work spaces, dry cleaner/laundromat, salons/spas, daycares, neighborhood-scale professional offices, medical/dental clinics, gift shops, schools,parks, churches, clubhouses,public uses,and other appropriate neighborhood uses. h. A landseape buffer- to residential uses is not required adjaeent to the 1441 home at the southe eemer-of the site as buffer-ifig will be aehieved thr-ough the adjaeei4 City park,VA4GA and seheel eemplex and the pr-epei4y will eventually be paft of the YN4GA site. The City Park is in the development process and the YMCA and school is already constructed; no buffer was required to the Hill property and this provision is no longer applicable. i. The annexation area shall be subdivided prior to issuance of any building permits beyond those required for the development of the school, YMCA and park site, and a wireless communication facility, the assisted livingfacility,acility, medical clinic, and the Hill's Century Farm North community center complex on common Lot 101 as shown on the revised conceptual development plan dated October 22 30,2018 2019; the assisted living f eili y and medieal elfin a sh ..,,. o the deta le site plan appr-eved with 14 2016 0092 Note: See Staffs recommended new DA provisions included in Section IX.A.1 that should be added to the existing/proposed DA provisions in this section as a provision of the subject Rezone request. Page 20 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 74 of 113 B. Legal Descriptions & Exhibit Maps for Rezone Overall Zoning Exhibit: r � AMITY ROA qV a -- 4: C-C -C_N • mod, � � . � .__ � , R_=S R-ts - Hillsdale City Park -00 MC 1 ills al - _ �1 Eleme _ HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH ZONING � j a EXISTING/ PROPOSED R.$ rn Page 21 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020- Page 75 of 113 km 9233 WEST STATE STREET I BOISE,ID 83714 209.639.6939 FAX 208.639.6930 June�,3,2t}l� Project No.:18.137 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DMRIP71ON FOR REZONE TO C-N A parcel of land being a poitlon of the North 2/2 of the northwest 114 of Section 33,Township 3 North,Range 1 East,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap marking the Northwest corner of said Section 33,which bears N8915'22"VVa distance of2,660.61feotfrom a found brass cap marking the North 1/4 corner of said Section 3�; Thence following the northerly line of the NW 1/4 of 5ecti❑n 93,589'15'22"E a distance of 892.60 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence followingsaid northerly line,589'15'22"E a distance of 609,12 feet to a paint; Thence leaving said northerly line,S00'16'11"W a distance of 350.17 feet to a point; Thence IN99"15'22"W a distance of612.02 feet to a point; Thence NOD'44'39"E a distance of 350316 feet tothe POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains4.909 acres,more or less,and Is subject to all existing easementsand{ordghts-of-way-of recofd urimpiied- Attached is EXHIBIT and by this reference made a part of. w 12459 Pd,p r' OF � q L. 'ap"o I 7101119 ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS wwwv.krnengllp.com Page 22 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 76 of 113 POLN I a COMMENCEMENT raw COR SECTION 33 E.AmItV Road POINT OF IRASI5 OF I3EARING3 BEGINNING 1469`15'22W 2660.93' NORTH I GDR SECTION 33 592.60' SLi9'15'22"f fi09.i2' -o ---R/NLd — A ° Total Rezone:4.90$± —b�.a � o APN: 51133223[31O ua $t 51 W212403 (POR.) � i " CURRI NT TONING: R—B g PROPOSED ZONING; C—N Ul Hill's Century Farm Ll, N69'I5'22V 612.02' Commercial Sub. No. 1 UNPLATTED UNPLATTEO R f4V- R/41- R�hV Healthy Living Subdivision � I! I N LEGEND _.._. 0 BRASS CAP ALUMINUM CAP CALCULATED POINT REZONE BOUNDARY — —SECTION LJNE 0 150 300 500 -EVW—RIGHT--OF—WAY LINE 1"=300' ENMNFERS.SURVEYORS.PLANNERT 923}WEST STATESTAEEf BUI55,i WhF-0D 53714 PHOHEjtpOI 638-843'9 FAX(20M 639-69P EXH I BIT B - REZONE TO C-N CENTURY FARM NORTH DATE fr13.1U19 PROJEL"r, 18-137 PUKE- : A PORTION OF THE N 1/2 NW 1/4 SHEE 1 OF 1 SECTION 33,T. 3 N., Ft. 1 E., B.M.,ADA COUNTY, ID Page 23 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 77 of 113 '1 9233 WEST STATE STREET I BOISE,0 83714 1 Z08.639$M 1 FAX MSS 639.6530 June 13,2019 Project Na:18-137 EXHIBIT A tl GAL DESCRIPTION FOR REZONE TO C-C A parcel of land being a portion of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 33,Township 3 North, Range 1 East,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as hollows; Commencing at found aluminum cap marking the Northwest corner of said Section 33,which bears h184°15'22"W a distance of 2,660.61 feet from a found brass cap marking the North 1/4 cornerof said Sertlon 33; Thence following the northerly line of the NW 1/4 of Section 33,S89'15'22`E a distance of 350.16 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence following said northerly line,SS9'15'22"E a distance of 542.44 feettn a point, Thence leaving said northerly line,SOWV38"W a distance of 350.16 foot to a point; Thence N89"15'22"W a distancevf 539,24feet to a point; Thence N40°13'13"E a distance of 350.17 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. said parcel contains 4.348 acres,more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights-of-way of record or Implied. Attached is EKHIBtT B and by this reference made a part of. 1245f) OF ENC,I SEERS j SURVIVORS PLANNERS www.kmengllp.cam Page 24 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 78 of 113 l POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NW COR SECTION 33 E.Amity Road BASS OF 9EARINGS `J:,K TH 'f 4 C[H N89'15'22"W 2650,61" 350.16' S89'15'22'E 542A4' _ �R/W �i/41' — RfH' R/41�R�yH .... iV 00,13,13,E Total Rezone:4,34$± 500'44'36"W 360.17' APH: 3113M23410 (POR.) 350-1V CURRENT ZONING: R-•8 PROP05ED ZONNIM C-C 4 dJ N89182 YP 539.24' w UNPLATTEU CIO i UNPLATTE❑ f Healthy Living j Subdivision LEGEND BRASS CAP ALUIVINlJhi CAP CALCULATED PRINT REZONE BOUNDARY -- — —SECTION LINE 0 150 300 50L Rlti~' RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE F 1"=300' ENGINEERS.SwFtiuOkS.PLANNERS 9733 w8r 1TATf MEE! BOISE,IPAHB 83714 PHONE 120BI 639-W39 FAIL;2G6y ra4£93tl EXHBIT B - REZONE TO C-C CENTURY FARM NORTH DATE: SHEET: A PORTION OFTHE NW 1/4 NW 1/4 1 OF 1 SECTION 33, T. 3 N., R. 1 E., 5,M., ADA COUNTY, ID Page 25 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020- Page 79 of 113 km WoMMEM 9233 WESTSTATE STREET I BOISE, ID 83714 1 208.639.6939 1 FAX 208.639.5930 December 24,2019 Project No,-184137 EXH113IT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR REZONE TO R-15 A parcel of land being a portion of the North 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 33,Township 3 North, Range 1 East,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being mare particularly described as follows: Commencing at found aluminumn cap markingthe Northwest corner of said Section 33,which bears NOO"13'13"E a distance of 2,677.50 feet from a found aluminum cap marking the West 1/4 corner of said Section 33; Thence following the westerly line of the Northwest 114 of Section 33,SOO*13'13"W a distance of 350.17 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence leaving said westerly fine,S99'15'22"E a distance of 1,874.00feetto the subdivision boundaryof Hill's Century Farm Commercial Subdivision No.1(Book 115 of Plats at Pages 17,131through 17,134,retards of Ada County,Idaho); 'thence following said subdivision boundary the following six(6)courses: 1. S00'4438"W a distance of 27.68 feet 2, 589`46'03"E a distance of 134.85 feet; 3, S00°44'38"W a distance of 297.56 feet; 4. S57°16'19"W a distance of 13,%feet, 5. N89°46'03"W a distance of 16.60 feet; 6, S0013'57"W a distance of 31.50 feet; Thence leaving said subdivision boundary,N89°46'03"W a distance of 175.29 feet; Thence 231.25 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 500.00 feet,a delta angle of 26'29'58",a chord bearing of N76'31'04"W and a chord distance of 229.20 feet; Thence N63°16'OS"W a distance of 105.11 feet; Thence 194.36 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 170.50 feet a delta angle of 61'57'08",a chord bearing of S59"33'30"W and a chord distance of 175.51 feet; Thence N89°27'52"W a distance of 52.53 feet; Thence S0012'08"W a distance of 397.94 feet; Thence 560'37'07"1N a distance of 157.72 feet; Thence N89°27'52"W a distance of 583.30 feet; Thence 72.41 feetalong the arcof a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 190.00 feet,a delta angle of 23°02'55",a chord bearing of N77°5624"IN and a chord distance of 7132 feet; Thence N66"24'57"W a distance of 40.65 feet; Thence 215.16 feet along the arcof a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 200.54 feet,a delta angle of 61°29'O8",a chord bearing of 559°4734"W and a chord distance of 204.99 feet; Thence N89'27'52"W a distance of 273.35 feet to a point on the said westerly fine of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 33; Thence fallowing said westerly line,NOC°13'13"E a distance of 913.07 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS I PLANNERS www.kmenglip.com Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 80 of 113 Said parcel contains 30.65 acres,more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights-of-way of record or implied. Attached is EXHIBIT Band by this reference made apart of. �145 ' °v L. 8 Page 27 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 81 of 113 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT AW COR SECTON 33 E. Amity Raab NORTHEcn4 COR — — N5W15'22"44 2680.61' _ r! R RJw- -R/w�RfW RfW R/W RA LL O SD4'13'13"W ` 350.17' U nplatted44 a Aft S1 1 3322301 0 (POR.) 1Jflp B Ed AM S1133212403 (POR.) v: � 7 Ln S6W15'22"E 1574,00' L2= POINT OF L1 L BEGINNING � E N63'15'05'W " O i. N89'27'52 W 105.11' L4 L5 _ Total Rezone: 30.65 AC t 52.53' Cl LS vim APN. 51133223D1U (POR.) _ w APN: 51 1332 1 2403 (POR) 1V89'46'D3 1 CM CURRENT ZONING: R—B 175. 8' m M PROPOSED ZONING: R-15 8 P, ii LW�1•Y y C G N66 24'57"W 2 z 40.65' J Ln Ln C N89'27'52'W +s—, N89'27'S2"YI Unpiatked 57.725732' 583.3D' 1 '07 tiY )L*J 273.35' APN: S1 1 3322301 0 (POR.) Hill's Century Farm Hill's Century Farm Subdivision Phase 1 Subdivision Phase 2 CURVETABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA CHORD 9RG CHORD LINE TABLE C1 500.00' 231.25' 2529'58" N7V31'D4"W 229.20' LINE# LENGTH DIRECTION C2 170.50' 104.36' 61'57'08" S59'33'30'W 175.51' L1 27.68 50'44'38-W C3 180.00' 72.41' 23'02'55" N77 56'24W 71.92' L2 _ 134,a5 S59'46103"E C4 200.50' I 215.16' 61'29'08- S59'47'34-Vi 2D4.99' 0 2.97.56 SO'44'36"W WEST 1/4 COR SECnoN 33 LE a L4 13.96 ssr 16'19"VP L5 16.60 N89'46'03"W 0 BRASS CAP L6 31.50 SO'13'57"W ALUMINUM CAP CALCULATED POINT kin REZONE BOUNDARY — — — — —SECTION LINE 0 150 304 60C, EN GI NEERS,SURVMRS.PLANNERS R/4! RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE 9233 WEST STATES; ET PARCEL LAVE 1"R£ -3oo, 90M.ID,W0 93714 P g FAX{zw;6 96930 EXHIBIT B - REZONE TO R-15 CE14TLJRY FARM NORTH DATE: IM4-2019 PROJECT: 28-237 SHEET: A PORTION OF THE IN 1/2 NW 1/4 1 OF 1 5ECTJON 33,T. 3 N., R. 1 E., R.M.,ADA COUNTY, ID Page 28 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 82 of 113 C. Overall Site Plan (date: 10/30/2019) ��>✓� .L,,✓ _ _ ..I �� I� .:II... � .o — AMITY RQA - � �� HILL'S C^� RETAIL/PRO... _ • SELF-SERVICE STORAGE FESS � 1oN L i� COMMERCIAL SU IVISI N r' i DFFI�E �y}yI • �'�`-'Ijy'INDEPENDENT LIVING .1 { ww )PVF _- .A VERANDA ASSISTED M 1 r LIVING - CADENCE ' 3 7 AGE Q{,I dIFIED D '+ ' r , L ESTATE ,l LOTS Hillsdale City Park,1 ' I C 4 �S c � CONVENTIUPJALLflTS fi r -` Illsdal U -- Ele _ ` ILL'S ZU�1C fM.__. ISIDN .-CIL "� ; ) D HILL'S CENTuRY FARM NORTH r �'f m October 36,2019 CONCEPTUAL—SUBJECT TO CHANGE >� '"� Page 29 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020- Page 83 of 113 A Site Plan& Landscape Plan for Storage Facility(dated: October 8 and 18, 2019 respectively) El—, ----------- _�� ❑...,. � ,.,m�.,e..® E.AMITY ROAD — — — i7l g l �j1 I I I Ir ][Ii li -- ------------------- 7 CENTURY FARM SELF STORAGE 16 SCNEMAIIC SIZE PLAN III !__-A'----- � 'T• 6�-»-� roa �. i 2 —. . w — F CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SITE PLAN o 0 km■ ci o Page 30 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 84 of 113 , I 1 o --------------- ------ ----- ------------- ---- ---- axs(I—E/sLF) --- _ -------- ------- � w --------- -- „w ll �9eo WI-I OF PARKING 1-P-MI-11—CAPE-KIP CANDITIDNA.L.USE PERMIT LANDSCAPE PLAN a-wz-'; — A�.�a...a� o; uo Page 31 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 85 of 113 E. Preliminary Plat(date: 11/18/2019) HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH PRELIMINARY PLAT II "" A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NW 114 OF SECTION 33,TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,RANGE 1 �E.Ai"mw 5 I` EAST,BOISE MERIDIAN,CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADACOUNTY,IDAHOmm MAP— _ d o 0 0 0 as" 0 0 0 0 �"ERP © o o o ® © ®moo37- 0 xo- 0 0 � O O O O O O O O o 0 0 OD O O O 0 0 0 I me vsI"d mvHAsq 0 0 o © o ® ®®®eeg WMM0-AHHSIRESIR-S0VIHPHMLE I ® ®Yq. Q C" O O Onmw"caxs_R.Y ARM NORTH _ " nuum near HILL'SCENTURYF G �I 61 I I I I 1 � I \ h _— iliIL ili 11 � I I I I I TI a I � 3 � �: , � nmw"rorm"urnox HILL'S CENT�1URYpPyFA�RRM NORTH D E""MMERiDIatI.IMON' 16 ion Page 32 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 86 of 113 � „`off •wo � .., ... ., «, «° wa m .Y $ r©©: �$ �➢ .°a � ®Y ©° e_oj.®$®€o@ o? o° of ®$ o; ©�_©'s of o3®, © © ,o �' 3 0 8~ •o $ .$ a �o wa � - ®s p ' $ 9 $ y® ? VRE�MINARV FIAT NOTES ®$ ® ai ®a$ 0. ®e •� ...em."�n si��' �H ILL SpCENTURYFARMNORTH w.yia - ©° w, B o $tl®, 3 ®. km © o Ro r �aPP2016 Page 33 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 87 of 113 F. Landscape Plan for Subdivision (date: 10/242019 4/2/2020 REVISED) C-_ 0 0 Y ------ ........... El ............. ..................... ............. . ................. ....... . ... ...... o . .... .... .......... . ... .... .... ------ STPEEYTREEGALCULATIONS(ITREEMSLFI w ;= mw ................................................. ...... .... LANDSCAPE COVER SHEET mceww.Eo HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH w PPL1_0 Page 34 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 88 of 113 ----- - ----- ---------------------- - -— _ =-=-- L1 O O O p O © O ® O O ® O ® O © O © ® O x''• O O i O ® o e e e ® ® e ey e o L T — 0 HILL'SCENTURYFARMNORTH LAND.SCJIPE PLAN �PPU.0„ O O O i O — R i O O O p j ---- � — -- --- — -- ----------------- ----,L,,--— — --------------- ------- — x — LANDSCAPE PLAN ; HILL'SCENTHRY FARM NORM ...i�p'[[iouous 3 � 4 � - e Page 35 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020- Page 89 of 113 G. Qualified Open Space Exhibit(date: 3/17/2020) HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT CJ -g� q�$ o maEsmma vw o 0 0 o o ® o LEGEND ����o o o o -0000000000000 � o E�ca� ,�, N o 0 0 =(R-DES �E) I� oo ® o o .ma...E IF R xeuv SPACE �1HILL'SCENTU RYNFARMNORTH OPEN IXHI81T o.w,�vas ovEI svncE Ex1H11 T Eia.o Page 36 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 90 of 113 H. Residential Setbacks for Cadence at Century Farm I � w 0 W.L.SLI+.YMPLE LN. - r— III vi 1r, I ' \1\ / J E O .HILL PARK LN N 0 z a r � 01 13 O J WQ:z f EXISTING RESIDENCE W,ROCKHAMPTON ST. AND OUTBUILDING f 0 HOME 1 LOT TYPES: FRONT: GARAGE: SIDE: STREET SIDE: REAR: I TRADITIONAL-ALLEY GARAGE ea 6.-0• a'-T c-0• 94r CADENCE TRADITIONAL-ALLEY PARK 510E 6'-W G-0' 4'-0" 6'-0' 6W AT J PATID-FRONTGARAGE 10w- sow• A'., 0101 iz-.v CENTURY FARM STANDARD-FROM GARAGE 151-T 10'-0' 6-7 1E-0' 151-0" n %TTACHEIIHOMES SE�6FGK8/�E TO eg MgxSu>iEP caP.�B+c�[F 69E wa r, Page 37 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 91 of 113 1. Building Elevations (date: 10/14/2019) r is !! a ._._._.J L. _.-----._._._. I j- # zl�o� ATM • s Mips AM 1 41«�mo.�«�nox-omM.e« S�F.T.mM.m�. L�".°xmm.®.u<axA.pm-ffwxEw�.oeN CENTURY FARM SELF STORAGE SCHEMATIC E%IERIOR ELEVA110NS ED .+nab umux sa rs s �xwm«'M.uruii mi�iiiulw em w.mo„xrnr.nrsfe so...>>amx xaav re sl de=�bi=om i - RiJILJU TYPICAL PATIO HOME ELEVATION J . EZI ® - TYPICALALLEY HOME ELEVATION IX. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION Rezone: 1. New development provisions shall be added to the proposed amended Development Agreement(DA)provisions in Section VIII.A of this report as a provision of the Rezone. Prior to approval of the Rezone ordinance, an amended DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s) at the time of rezone ordinance adoption, and the Page 38 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 92 of 113 developer. The amended DA shall be signed by the property owner and developer and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the rezone. The amended DA shall incorporate the following provisions: a. The buildings in the retail/professional office area shown on the conceptual development plan shall be arranged to create some form of common,usable area, such as a plaza or green space as desired in Mixed Use designated areas as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan(see pg. 25). A concept site plan shall be submitted prior to the City Council hearing demonstrating compliance with this provision. The Applicant declined to revise the site plan and requests this condition is deleted. b. Building sizes in the commercial retail/office portion of the development shall be limited to a 20,000 square foot building footprint as desired in MU-N designated areas in accord with the Comprehensive Plan(see pg. 25).If a structure contains a mix of both residential and office, or residential and commercial land uses, the maximum building size may exceed 20,000 square feet. c. Provide 10' wide detached multi-use pathways within the street buffers along S. Eagle Rd. and E.Amity Rd. in place of sidewalks as requested by the Park's Department. Conditional Use Permit(Storage Facility): 2. The site plan included in Section VIII.D, dated October 10, 2019, shall be revised as follows: a. The buffer area(and other areas as applicable)not visible from a public street or driveway behind the storage facility on the south side of the building shall be fenced off from public access to prevent incidences of crime in accord CPTED guidelines. b. Depict a 10' wide detached multi-use pathway within the street buffer along E. Amity Rd. as required by the Park's Department. The Applicant requests this condition is deleted. 3. The landscape plan included in Section VIII.D, dated October 10,2019, shall be revised as follows: a. Depict additional evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs within the 25' wide buffer along the southern boundary of the site to result in a barrier that allows trees to touch at maturity in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-9C. b. To prevent incidences of crime in buffer areas that aren't isn't visible from a public street, Staff recommends the area is fenced off from public access in accord CPTED guidelines. c. Depict a 10' wide detached multi-use pathway within the street buffer along E. Amity Rd. as required by the Park's Department. The Applicant requests this condition is deleted. d. Extend the 5' wide pathway at the north boundary through the 25' wide buffer into the commercial site. 4. Compliance with the standards for self-service storage facilities listed in UDC 11-4-3-34 is required. 5. The entrance or view of the facility shall be open to adjoining businesses and low impact security lighting shall be provided in accord with UDC 11-3A-16A. Page 39 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 93 of 113 6. If abutting a residential district,the facility hours of public operation shall be limited to six o'clock(6:00)A.M. to eleven o'clock(11:00)P.M. 7. The design of the storage structures shall comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. 8. The property shall be subdivided prior to submittal of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) and Design Review(DES)application for this use.A CZC and DES application shall be approved prior to submittal of building permit applications for the site. Preliminary Plat: 9. The preliminary plat included in Section VIII.E, dated November 18,2019, is approved as submitted. 10. The landscape plan included in Section VULF,dated OetobeF 24, 2019 April 2,2020, shall be revised as follows a. Depict a 10' wide detached multi-use pathway within the street buffers along S. Eagle Rd. and E.Amity Rd. in place of a sidewalk. The Applicant requests this condition is deleted. b. if the unimproved right of way is 10' or-greater-from the edge of pavement to the edge 9 sidewalk or-pr-epet4y line,the developer-shall main�aia a 10' eempaeted shoulder-meeting with lawn or-other vegetative ground eavems as set€ei4h in UDC11 2nB 7 Depicted e. Solid feneing adjaeef4 to eemmen dfiveways is prohibited unless separated by- riiinifymm 5'�wide!a-adset'1ped buffer per-T TTI��DG 11 6C 3D.S. T�rccppxxca�l�ae�icc lands,.apin.; aeeer-d with this star a.Depicted d. + side 4 t 1 n�o zm ve r-eyised to eamply it .t o E'i�C ca3c�iizc-vr)J6 , , PT��inrzrry standards listed: T DG 11 3 n 7A. Complies e. Inelude a detail f6f:th fenee that eemplies with the standafds listed in UDG 1 3A 7 Included 11. The existing home and accessory structures at the northeast corner of the site shall be removed prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat for the phase in which they are located. 12. Submit a 14' wide public pedestrian easement for the multi-use pathway along E.Amity Rd. and S. Eagle Rd. to the Planning Division prior to submittal of the final plat for City Engineer signature as required by the Park's Department. The Applicant requests this condition is deleted. 13. The Applicant or Owner shall have one year to complete the tasks listed in UDC 11-3F-3B for final approval of the private streets proposed within the development.No building permit shall be issued for any structure using a private street for access to a public street until the private street has been approved. 14. The Applicant shall coordinate with Terri Ricks,Land Development, and Joe Bongiorno,Fire Dept., for addressing lots accessed by alleys without frontage on a street. 15. An exhibit shall be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks, fencing, building envelope and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via common driveways. Driveways for abutting properties that aren't taking access from the common driveway(s) shall be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line away from the common Page 40 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 94 of 113 driveway. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited unless separated by a minimum 5-foot wide landscaped buffer. 16. A perpetual ingress/egress easement for the common driveway(s)is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment.A copy of the easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat. 17. Address signage shall be provided at the ends of the common driveways on Lots 19 and 54, Block 1; and for lots accessed by alleys that don't have frontage on a private street for emergency wayfinding purposes. 18. A minimum of 5.5 acres of qualified open space shall be provided in accord with the qualified open space exhibit in Section VIII.G; and qualified site amenities shall be provided consisting of a clubhouse, swimming pool, segments of the multi-use pathway system, and outdoor activity complex(specific amenities in this area are to be determined at CZC). 19. All common driveways shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. 20. Parking is restricted to one side of the 29-foot wide streets and shall be provided on the street side adjacent to the alley accessed units rather than the patio homes with front accessed garages to allow for more spaces that aren't encumbered by driveways. Planned Unit Development(PUD): 21. Development of the R-15 zoned gated portion of the development(i.e. Cadence) shall be consistent with the Residential Setbacks exhibit in Section VIII.H and the conceptual building elevations included in Section VIII.I. 22. Access to the through property on Lot 150,Block 1 is allowed via two access points—one via E. Hill Park Ln. for the house and one via W. Rockhampton Ct. for the shop associated with the house,unless otherwise approved by City Council. 23. All alleys shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3B.5 with an allowance for the entire length to be visible from a private street rather than a public street. 24. A minimum of 80 square feet of private,usable open space shall be provided for each dwelling unit;this requirement can be satisfied through porches,patios, decks and enclosed yards as set forth in UDC 11-7-4B. 25. An applieation for-Alter-native Complianee to the off street par-king standards listed in UDC Table 11 X 6 for-single family dwellings shall be submitted to the P! Division and approved by the Dir-eetor-prior-to the City Couneil hearing. This application was determined to not be required as the proposed plan complies with the parking standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 No civil utility plans were submitted for the sanitary sewer with this application,therefore no specific review or modeling has been completed. 1.2 A portion of the proposed 8"water main will need to be upsized to 12". The reason for the 12" size is for future abandonment of the existing 12" in Eagle Road due to avoiding utilities crossing the roundabout at the Amity intersection. Specifically from Eagle Road through the Page 41 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 95 of 113 common area to Palatino,then down Dalrymple to the common area and then north to Amity Road. 1.3 Manholes cannot be located in landscaped areas unless they are located within an access road per City standards are provided. 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2"x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year- round source of water(MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals,or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B.Whitney at(208)334-2190. Page 42 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 96 of 113 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for Page 43 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 97 of 113 surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT h ttps:11we b lin k.m eridia n c i ty.org/WeUink/Doc View.aspx?id=1819 6 6&db id=0&rep o=Meridia n C hty D. POLICE DEPARTMENT https:llweblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=182147&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC hty E. PARK'S DEPARTMENT https:llweblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=184769&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC i &cr=1 F. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO(COMPASS) https:llweblink.meridianci(E.orglWebLinklDocView.aspx?id=182235&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC 41 G. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT https:llweblink.meridiancity.orglWebLinklDoc View.asp x?id=182768&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Lty H. BOISE PROJECT BOARD OF CONTROL https:llweblink.meridiancity.orglWebLinklDocView.aspx?id=182167&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Lu I. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT https:llweblink.meridiancity.orglWebLinklDoc View.asp x?id=182158&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Lty J. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) hggs:llweblink.meridiancit .00rg2WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=182145&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC K. WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT(WASD) https:llweblink.meridiancity.orglWebLinklDocView.aspx?id=183173&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ity Page 44 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 98 of 113 L. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https://weblink.meridianciN.org/WebLink/DocView.gyp x?id=183196&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC iv X. FINDINGS A. Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant a rezone, the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Commission finds the proposed rezone and subsequent development plan is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan for the MU-NFL UM designation. (See section V above for more information) 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment and development complies with the purpose statement of the residential districts in that it will contribute toward the range of housing opportunities available within the City; and with the purpose statement of the commercial districts in that it will provide for the retail and service needs of the community consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare as the proposed medium density residential uses, storage facility and commercial retail and office uses should be compatible with adjacent existing and future residential, commercial and public/quasi public development. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The Commission finds City services are available to be provided to this development. The school district submitted comments stating that the elementary and high schools are currently under enrollment capacity but that the middle school is over capacity. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. This finding is not applicable as the request is for a rezone, not annexation. B. Preliminary Plat Findings: In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; The Commission finds that the proposed plat with Staffs recommendations is in substantial compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density, Page 45 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 99 of 113 transportation, and pedestrian connectivity. Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies in, Section V of this report for more information. 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Commission finds that public services will be provided to the subject property upon development. (See Exhibit B of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers) 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the development at their own cost, the Commission finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Commission finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development based upon comments from the public service providers (i.e., Police, Fire, ACHD, etc.). (See Section IXfor more information) 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and, The Commission is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated with the platting of this property. ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The Commission is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that exist on this site that require preserving. C. Conditional Use Permit(UDC 11-513-6E) The Commission shall base its determination on the Conditional Use Permit request upon the following: 1. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located. The Commission finds that the subject property is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and dimensional and development regulations of the C-C district(see Analysis, Section Vfor more information). 2. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accord with the requirements of this Title. The Commission finds that the proposed storage facility is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan FL UM designation of MU-N and is allowed as a conditional use in UDC Table 11-2B-2 in the C-C zoning district. Further, the Commission finds the proposed use of the site will provide a needed service within close proximity to residential uses. 3. That the design,construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area. Page 46 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 100 of 113 The Commission finds that if the applicant complies with the conditions outlined in this report, the operation of the proposed self-service storage facility should be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing and intended character of the area. 4. That the proposed use,if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed,will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. The Commission finds that if the applicant complies with the conditions outlined in this report, the proposed use will not adversely affect other property in the area. The Council should weigh any public testimony provided to determine if the development will adversely affect other properties in the vicinity. 5. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, schools,parks,police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal,water,and sewer. The Commission finds that essential public services are available to this property and that the use will be adequately served by these facilities. A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(UDC 11-7-5): Upon recommendation from the Commission,the Council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant a planned development request,the Council shall make the following findings: l. The planned unit development demonstrates exceptional high quality in site design through the provision of cohesive, continuous,visually related and functionally linked patterns of development, street and pathway layout, and building design. The Commission finds the proposed PUD demonstrates a high quality of development and site design with amenities that provides unique housing options for those 55 and older in the community. 2. The planned unit development preserves the significant natural, scenic and/or historic features. The Commission is unaware of any significant natural, scenic and/or historic features that may exist on this site. 3. The arrangement of uses and/or structures in the development does not cause damage,hazard, or nuisance to persons or property in the vicinity. The Commission finds the proposed use and development of this property will not cause damage, hazard or nuisance to persons or property in the vicinity. 4. The internal street,bike and pedestrian circulation system is designed for the efficient and safe flow of vehicles,bicyclists and pedestrians without having a disruptive influence upon the activities and functions contained within the development,nor place an undue burden upon existing transportation and other public services in the surrounding area. The Commission finds the internal private streets should provide for safe internal access to homes within the development and proposed pedestrian pathway will provide a safe bicycle and pedestrian route to the adjacent commercial development. Page 47 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 101 of 113 5. Community facilities, such as a park,recreational, and dedicated open space areas are functionally related and accessible to all dwelling units via pedestrian and/or bicycle pathways. The Commission finds the proposed subdivision amenities (i.e. swimming pool, community center and outdoor activity area) are accessible to residents within the development via internal sidewalks. 6. The proposal complies with the density and use standards requirements in accord with chapter 2, "District Regulations", of this title. The Commission finds the proposed single-family residential use of the development is a principal permitted use in the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts and falls within the density desired in this area. 7. The amenities provided are appropriate in number and scale to the proposed development. The Commission finds the proposed amenities are appropriate for this development and provide a variety of entertainment for residents. 8. The planned unit development is in conformance with the comprehensive plan. The Commission finds the proposed PUD is in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. E. PRIVATE STREET(UDC 11 3F-4) In order to approve the application,the Director shall find the following: 1. The design of the private street meets the requirements of this Article; The Director finds design of the proposed private streets complies with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4A except as approved through alternative compliance. See analysis in Section V for more information. 2. Granting approval of the private street would not cause damage hazard, or nuisance, or other detriment to persons,property, or uses in the vicinity; and The Director finds the proposed private streets shouldn't cause any hazard, nuisance or other detriment to persons,property or uses in the vicinity if they are designed as proposed and constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4B. 3. The use and location of the private street shall not conflict with the comprehensive plan and/or the regional transportation plan. The Director finds the location of the private streets does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and/or the regional transportation plan. 4. The proposed residential development(if applicable)is a mew or gated development. The Director finds the proposed gated residential development includes mews. F. ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE(UDC 11-3A-19.2A) In order to grant approval for alternative compliance,the director shall determine the following findings: Page 48 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 102 of 113 l. Strict adherence or application of the requirements is not feasible; OR While it's feasible for the applicant to comply with UDC standards pertaining to private streets, the Director finds the proposed development offers a unique design as proposed with the planned unit development. 2. The alternative compliance provides an equal or superior means for meeting the requirements; and The Director finds the planned unit development proposed by the applicant as a whole provides an equal or superior means for meeting the requirements in that it contributes to the unique character and diversity in housing types available within the City. 3. The alternative means will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or impair the intended uses and character of the surrounding properties. The Director finds that the proposed alternative means will not be detrimental to the public welfare or impair the intended use%haracter of the surrounding properties and will actually contribute to the character and variety of housing types in this area of the City. Page 49 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 21,2020— Page 103 of 113 •-+ . V � ' �► �a AMITY ROA Ef ` - RETAIL/PROFESSIONAL 1' HILL'S CENTt)R AR OFFICE COMMERCIALS S O L_ INDEPENDENT INGL_L_v: VERANDA ' ASSISTED 7 .� ► �. = --- 4 LIVING 1i6 FIEF y 11 1 r + — + ESTATELOTS �" f -, Hillsdale „r t A-) � � � , , , , � - City Park 3 y{ df �r MC Ll y3 CONVENT-I*AL LOTS or - a I illsdal ' Elem _ HI L'S HT RY im UBf51 N 40C� HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH - -_ - -T April 6, 2Q2C 0 CONCEPTUAL, SUBJECT TO CHANGE r A d #+ _ AMITY ROA coc v CoN — V-. IL D -R- 1 5 #' Hillsdale _ City Park MC illsdal Elem r� p. HILL'S CENTURY NOR H ZONING EXITING / PROPOSED - f - -O M HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS —MERCIAL PHASE / �J}��� • v a - — _ _ —m p_ m — — f.-t£tlW-1FlFL OPfx M wzEYR6E of Ou41FFL OPEN a—E RESIRENl1AL HORTI PHASE ( � �oeHas,a a• tOOz T Mu�LTU!h�hv. ���iaT� O l:l Q D Paw m[s 4R'SPQ£iiA�41ET�o'+F`�wv.£^.E •,i r['RES O yo= K RESIRENMLSOVIH PHASE 1Vff .A 1„f✓•L soffry SryasE ERG TW!t+£S +K�of e'fV,REc spxk+ PS,,LH:3 � meA,FROu,[� a4JeEPLUl ILH, OVERALL SHE E 11 n� H - 0 o c n � � LEGEND O a � rxk..-;o.wnm nl�fN xe.cE7 a �00000000000 � 0 - o a o COMMON LOTAREAS{RESIDENTIAL NORTH PHASE) ko o a 3 m oa E Q D 0 ® ® 1�o ze uuP P� o o 9pII COMMON LOTAREAS[RESIDENTIAL SOUTH PHASE} I � � attx f Lm 1 Lm.ram ISF1 °L�I�j � 6 [� COMMON LOTAREAS ICOMNIERCIAL�PHASE}'`'S' LCCN f LOT P L'R EA iSf] L pjtmisF7 CPc 7 1—Q ; 1,. ow 1 msos v.00 uf�lfE9 fapP F.TV,! � ;— '�— � ��— ——— — • 5 +i,.l� xao0 PN �Sk OF cc[a N trFWS�c 1 Jgpp QQl r 0' � 0 0 � HMREP srmP .,c o.0 _ w.Pocbwsrexsr. 88 Q ® ® —'2 9 I PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH°�� � EOPEN SPACE EXHIBITMERIDIAN,IDAHO REVISICWSEw1Lkm43 I 4 fl N W W.DALRYMPLE LN. aQ 7T Z � o E.HILL ./ PARS LN. z ■ 0 0 _— r ¢ z a � d d O J (ry F�lrl EXISTING RESIDENGE - W.ROCKHAMPTON ST. AND OUTBUILDING w � J 7 W ROCfSHAMPTON ST. u; HOME 1 LOT TYPES: FROWr- GARAGE- SIDE- STREET SIDE: REAR: )_] TRADITIONAL-ALLEY GARAGE 6-0" 6'-4' 4'0- 61-0' 6-01 CADENCE El TRADITIONAL-ALLEY PARK SIDE s'-0" C-a' 4'-0- s-0' 0°0' AT LD PATIO-FRONT GARAGE 10'-0- 20'-0' 4'-0' S'-0' 12'-0" CENTURY FARM M STANDARD•FRONT GARAGE 15'-(r 20'-0' 5'-0' 0 ATTACHED HOMES SET3ACn ARE T6 BE MEASVRE FROM BACK OF&E WAUK t = � fi57 011024 Lf.at 3.d'�MI Amlty Rd.Y altlewalk com - -- 11.0•T O•R Z ' J-A I t L � ■ Hill'-Century Farm Commercial SUbdivision I ■ Hill's Century f � ■ Ren lance ' ti � ■ Approved 5-foot sidewalk Constructed/under construction r . f _ i Isdale.1 11 - Hill's Century Farm Subdivi I ark h ■ - Legend ; �. � Area of City Impact Future Roads Meridian Parks Qa LAK -� I Schools W Pathway Typology(Proposed) ---- Alternative Route ❑IS overt' ark i Existing Pathway ...... Long-Term Route ■■. 4 Micro Path DELETE PATHWAY CONDITIONS On Street Route � b, 3e, i0a & 12 5 Proposed Pathway • • • MARTI DILL HOMESITE , ESTATE LOTS - 4 +! KI PARK ST, � r i f 4' _ Hillsdale ��:• ,'f - roc n��ron�cT �I City Pa rk 1�, TYPICAL PATIO HOME ELEVATION TYPICAL ALLEY HOME ELEVATION CADENCE AT CENTURY FARM 40- All of -- --------- - - - - - --- 1 I NORTH OVER&L ELEVATION -t r1amA ®' ��o-WA Z I Ensr oY�NL ELEVAnaN AN"! 4 - J, .4 a laow & 31 SO T OVERALL ELEVATION i� dim ANB:BROIIIE PMB HnH 4N000 PN6H _ WRK�LORFAMATlPI(:AL SfM1tlNG SEIM POLE >' BGM(xlOG PBfRCH!@R MEINLCIW18 a:yFAL P�'Ak1H MElIA ClIP1Y•!d SIdVEMYErt Y1N1 - RNBS C£MAl&IN9� 16'VWBGLLI✓EyFAL — MCIALSiIICCaPM�H 41=OVMALLELEVATON-➢UKLVM riFA mffMNNEMRY 1NOKHDVHWLaI ATION-4 MREAREAP NL CENTURY FARM SELF STORAGE 140CT1EER2D" SCHEMATIC EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 8 bmdcEjj, Sd Lake Div S2 Em bongs Plooe Sott Lobe City,IJT&9111 E01.531.1144 Bose 8W W.Mmn 53reet SVBe 990 Bosse,I❑B31U2 2 -4241US I bob000kde ..com •-+ . V � ' �► �a AMITY ROA Ef ` - RETAIL/PROFESSIONAL 1' HILL'S CENTt)R AR OFFICE COMMERCIALS S O L_ INDEPENDENT INGL_L_v: VERANDA ' ASSISTED 7 .� ► �. = --- 4 LIVING 1i6 FIEF y 11 1 r + — + ESTATELOTS �" f -, Hillsdale „r t A-) � � � , , , , � - City Park 3 y{ df �r MC Ll y3 CONVENT-I*AL LOTS or - a I illsdal ' Elem _ HI L'S HT RY im UBf51 N 40C� HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH - -_ - -T April 6, 2Q2C 0 CONCEPTUAL, SUBJECT TO CHANGE r A April 9, 2020 To: Mayor Robert Simison Meridian City Council From: David Turnbull Re:Hill's Century Farm North (H-2019-0134)— Conditions of Approval I'm providing this condition-specific response for your consideration in advance of the Council's April 2I't hearing of the P&Z Commission's recommendation for approval of Hill's Century Farm North (HCF North)—a development by Brighton on behalf of Marti Hill. Staff recommended approval of the project to the Commission with specific items to be addressed prior to the Council hearing. Those items are detailed below, noting actions already taken plus "applicant requests"for deletion of several conditions for the reasons stated. HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH P&Z COMMISSION ACTION ITEMS "Prior to the City Council's [4/21/2020] Hearing" IX.CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS& CONDITIONS (Yellow highlights as taken directly from Staff Report conditions,pages 38-44) Item 1 —Rezone 1. New development provisions shall be added to the proposed amended Development Agreement(DA) provisions in Section VIII.A of this report as a provision of the Rezone. Prior to approval of the Rezone ordinance, an amended DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s)at the time of rezone ordinance adoption,and the developer. The amended DA shall be signed by the property owner and developer and returned to the Planning Division within six(6) months of the City Council granting the rezone. The amended DA shall incorporate the following provisions: a. The buildings in the r-etail/pr-efessional effiee area shev,,%on the eeneeptual development plan shall be affanged to or-eate some fbfm of eemmen,usable area, sueh as a plaza oF green spaoe as desifed in Mixed Use designated areas-As se-4 in-the Compfehensive Plan(see pg. 25). C-engp4onc-e with this pr,9144014 Applicant Request: Deletion of the foregoing language. HCF North, in combination with the previously-approved HCF Commercial Subdivision (composite site plan,following page),is among the most diverse "mixed-use"projects of its size in the city, complying fully with the objectives of the MU-N land-use designation of the Comprehensive Plan's FLUM. The proposed requirement takes a single component of the project, in isolation,to require "some form of common, usable area... "without consideration of the overall project's varied land uses, including Hillsdale Park, on land provided by Marti Hill to the City,which lies literally at its center. We believe the project's extensive open space,diverse land uses, and public and private "spaces"—including the park/YMCA/school complex—address staff s concern. 1 1 - -_ .► �, AMITY ROA 71 , « RETAIL/PROFESSIONAL HILL'S CENTURY AR OFFICE "� COMMERCIAL 5U6j S r5 y INDEPENDENT LIVING - � g � ��� `� �,;n Y 's ,ems�� � '�' -- 7 I �' 4� +� VERANDAIto ASSISTED CA E N C E �,, . . --� � LIVING r����'. AGE Q LI FI ED 7� ;� ni r A ESTATE ' r + LOTS �o L I--- I ' o �- Hillsdale City Park � MC -, CON VENT�C11AL LOTS j or f illsdal -- HI L'S MT RY RM ISI N HILL'S CENTURY FARM NORTH -= rnn April 6, 2020 + CONCEPTUAL, SUBJECT TC CHANGE N Item 2—Conditional Use Permit (Storage Facility) (Submitted 412120, less conditions 2.b& 3.c) 2. The site plan included in Section VIII.D, dated October 10,2019, shall be revised as follows: a. The buffer area(and other areas as applicable)not visible from a public street or driveway behind the storage facility on the south side of the building shall be fenced off from public access to prevent incidences of crime in accord CPTED guidelines. (AGREE) b. Depiet-a 10' wide detaehe 6 tise patlway within the street buffer-along E. Amity ity Rd. s required by the Park's Depaftmen4. Applicant Request: Delete Condition 2.b. The Pathways Map (excerpt below) mirrors the City's Adopted Pathways Master Plan showing pathways constructed/under construction in Hill's Century Farm. However,the Parks Department has requested multi-use pathways along Amity and Eagle Roads.Neither are components of that plan as On-Street or Proposed Pathway routes. In compliance with prior City and ACHD approvals, 5-foot sidewalks have been constructed along both streets. Thus,with those agency-required and approved sidewalks in-place, deletion of this condition,along with related conditions 3.c, 10.a and 12 below, is appropriate. Legend F__sic-Tom •. z Area of City Impact Q r �.....� t Future Roads Re sance ' Q � Meridian Parks W schools r Pathway Typology (Proposed) ; Hillsdale; -- Alternative Route Park Existing Pathway Long-Term Route Micro Path �- On Street Route ois overy ark Proposed Pathway 3. The landscape plan included in Section VIII.D, dated October 10,2019, shall be revised as follows: a. Depict additional evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs within the 25' wide buffer along the southern boundary of the site to result in a barrier that allows trees to touch at maturity in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-9C. (AGREE) b. To prevent incidences of crime in buffer areas that aren't isn't visible from a public street, Staff recommends the area is fenced off from public access in accord CPTED guidelines. (AGREE) e. Depiet a 10' wide detaehed multi use pathway within the stifeet buffer-along& Amit-y Rd. as Applicant Request: Delete Condition 3.c for the reasons cited above. 3 d. Extend the 5' wide pathway at the north boundary through the 25' wide buffer into the commercial site. (AGREE) Item 3—Preliminary Plat 10. The landscape plan included in Section VULF,dated October 24,2019, shall be revised as follows prior to the City Council hearing: (Submitted 412120, less condition 10.a) a. Depiet a 10' wide detached nwlti use pathway within the street buffer-s along S. Eagle Rd. an Applicant Request: Delete Condition 10.a for the reasons cited above. b. If the unimproved right-of-way is 10' or greater from the edge of pavement to the edge of sidewalk or property line,the developer shall maintain a 10' compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of the transportation authority and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover as set forth in UDC 11-313-7C.5. (AGREE) c. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited unless separated by a minimum 5' wide landscaped buffer per UDC 11-6C-3D.5. If applicable, depict landscaping in accord with this standard. (AGREE) d. Fencing on the east side of Lot 107,Block 1, shall be revised to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7A.7b. (AGREE) e. Include a detail for the open vision fence that complies with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7A.7. (AGREE) 12. S4mit a 14' wide p4lie pedestrian easement for-the multi tise pathway along E. Am4y Rd. and S. Eagle Rd. to the Planning Division pr-iof to submittal of the final plat fef City Engineer-signatufe as roa by the Par4's Depaftment. Applicant Request: Delete Condition 12; related conditions 2.a, 3.c & 10.a. 13. The Applicant or Owner shall have one year to complete the tasks listed in UDC 11-3F-3B for final approval of the private streets proposed within the development.No building permit, except for the Cadence community center, shall be issued for any structure using a private street for access to a public street until the private street has been approved. Applicant Request: Add red-highlighted language. Item 4—Planned Unit Development(PUD) 25. An application for Alternative Compliance to the off-street parking standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family dwellings shall be submitted to the Planning Division and approved by the Director prior to the City Council hearing. (Submitted electronically April 2, 2020 and by mailed hard copy on April 3,2020) 4 ADDENDUM- CENTURY FARM PROJECT DESIGN STYLES COMMENTARY In its analysis of the project applications, staff expressed concern that the self-storage building elevations do not "blend"with the residential components of the project; and, on page 38 of the staff report, the elevations of that facility were specifically tagged as "Not Approved. " While there is harmony of design within the varied residential elements of the project—Cadence age-qualified, estate and conventional single-family, Veranda assisted living and independent living—HCF North's retail/professional office uses will be distinctly commercial in character, continuing the established institutional and commercial character of Hillsdale School,YMCA, St. Luke's health clinic, DR-approved/under construction dental clinic—and proposed self- storage facility. Although the existing and proposed commercial designs are distinctly non-residential,with the required landscape buffers and setbacks we believe they will "blend"with the overall Century Farm community as is virtually the case throughout the City of Meridian. REQUESTED ACTION On page 8 of the report, staff proposed an "In the alternative" solution: submittal of design guidelines for the overall development. Therefore, we are pleased to provide Century Farm Design Styles—Commercial& Residential, the 31-page document which follows, showing existing and proposed commercial and residential designs. It illustrates how diversity of design can work together to form a sense of community, even when commercial buildings may not "blend with the residential building in color, materials or design. " We ask the Council to accept the document. . . • As responsive to staff s request for "design guidelines;" • As the guide for future HCF North CZC/Design Review approvals; and • To accept the design of the self-service storage facility, as proposed and depicted in the application and Century Farm Design Styles, as "approved"—subject only to CZC and Design Review. 5 CENTURY - F A R M - Design Styles Commercial & Residential f 5 AMITY ROA ' 6m m1mo RETAIL/PROFESSIONAL HILL'S CENTURY FARM , 'l • " ' OFFICE COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISIONtw INDEPENDENT LIVING L , - `�,.. .�+► ,� VERANDA + , ASSISTED I CADENCE LIVING ' M ' ACE Q WFIED 4 ESTATE . r !! 1 LOTS - = ` - �_- Hillsdale City Park , ' 1111C CONVENT AL LET � i ,. Elm : HILL'S CENTURY FARM SUBOWI ION t - r HILL'SCENTURYARM NORTH � � � m Apri! 6, 2020 e CONCEPTUAL, SUBJECT TO CHANGE ` � '. EW F CENTURY R M - Commercial • Facades. Articulated to provide visual integrity of the material. Wall planes are broken up using material joint lines, reveals and/or material banding. • Rooflines. Modulated to provide variation in height and show consistency through flat or low-sloped planes. • Entrances. Overhangs have been provided at the primary entrances. • Materials. Sustainable material selections are re resented using masonry, cement panel siding, stucco metal andp lazin . p g, g g • Where masonry is used the material is designed to wrap the corners to convey an appearance of mass. • Accent material is used in conjunction with the main materials to break up the fagade planes and provide visual interest. • Colors. Subtle, neutral tones that are complimentary to other commercial buildings. 0 YMCA ©Hillsdale ©St. Luke's OlDental ©Storage N. Lek ~ - IITY RQA ti 1 - �' - 4 C mnj rc i a Ir _j mHillsdale � ' ' City Park YMC . _ 11 sdal Ele ' : - cn . _ > m 4 3 1 •!i►!F r it�•�. - -",i�3R� a'� •_ . • .. '.•F ...��, � :S. x • X fipit , ,�+ ,•r +` ramIA. - � pop'•: f ; _ Nv k 1 cf, �.. N T R -- � _ _■ � -� _ � FAR M 5 4 3 ................................. - --, - In c-- �__ •` . u ��� — _.. �.....--�-��+'tee C - N T U R Nl 1 J�. i' a= St Luke's the v ` 155 , rrr,s THEM T �- - - -- VVC PeWEREQ. _- �aE== Now" CENTURY F A R M I I I � I •A I { � � � r'i•h�� ' aiv 111 ' fllj j jai — — .�` - � �' ���I�..[` `��f+'�:,:.•ate, ��� .a -own is Bosom ME --- -_- AM `y• i6- aw w �`r' Am EKT6RY r� n 00F. NTURY Alk. ,, F .A � � 4 ALMO T N, - r F: .f - ; C.ENTURY F A R. M . �� v • r► i'16 oppAlt r s y .a. /f r f +r N »� F A ■i M z 4 - �� F A.R .M ��. i 6 4 r... t r ul 16" VERTICAL REVEAL IAETALI I _ TI SOLDIER COURSE _ �. BANDING PANEL WITH STUCCO FINISH v w . COLORLIGHT FIBER "! _PANEL WITH METAL CHANNEL i 4 - �# w � k F .{� T- ENTURY F A R M CENTURY — F A R M — Residential Design • — Residential ( Cadence Active Adult ) • — Independent LiVina • — Veranda Senior Living N. Lek ~ - IITY RQA ti 1 - �' - 4 C mnj rc i a Ir _j mHillsdale � ' ' City Park YMC . _ 11 sdal Ele ' : - cn . _ > m byy 1 S' � � Y• _ � � '.1C -ram T Ci • 6 1 � 1 At! aA mot- - f+ f AFr: VRAM- z A Oki rr � a�•. r r'r � �I bra •�� }• a'+i 4' �]J(�' •' L �Y'� v- �•S �F�� ..A� .tip�. '.�. L:!.5�-.w .. il' .ti=!• 1;�+ ' • • � - �rlv•f rr`.l_�'1 �J.'1 l'Yu,,�(' � � 'itlir.� y• V���y4Y al �I.� � '�•\I • �. C •�Il:�' a l ��,�:•y�'*; _�-� „ _ ,�moit _ i°. - •'ik�:N�r �, Y•i .r s� ° �.xt• i.. ;'y:':.• r_ 'ice ,, 'R,.,�.�,',. „ ',�'�`���•' - .. 11 - A _ T--.- �F,:• 1 _ - • _ .. - r � • - r T Y � � s i r �'* •,r.a _ _ �y ram'_s..g . Jill I:ly ■ � ■ I'� 1 ,� Z r T �., ,r. � �'v.� - � •. .�r �" a •:�:�" j: ti � !it.■ E A ieS Ln IT L' 1 a�4. � R W ti �l ti £280 -- -5 14 c-: 1 E IDIAN --- IDAHO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Agenda Item Number: 6 Item Title: Future Meeting Topics Meeting Notes: E IDIAN --- IDAHO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Amended onto Agenda Agenda Item Number: 7 Item Title: Meeting Notes: Into Session: 7:3212m Out of Session: 8:04pm