Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2020-04-16
MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA City Council Chambers 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Thursday, April 16, 2020 at 6:00 PM 1. Roll-Call Attendance X Lisa Holland X And rew S eal X Rhonda McCarvel X Patricia Pitzer X Nick Grove X Bill Cassinelli 2. Adoption of Agenda X Ryan Fitzgerald - Chairperson 3. Consent Agenda [Action Items] – Approved A. Approve Minutes of April 2, 2020 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting B. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Hidden Gem Events (H- 2020-0015) by Elizabeth Burgess, Located at 134 E. State Ave. 4. Community Items [Action Items] A. Presentation of Staff Report for Urban Renewal Plan for the Union District Urban Renewal Project and First Amendment to the Meridian Revitalization Plan B. Resolution No PZ-20-01. A Resolution of the Planning and Zoning Commission for the City of Meridian, Idaho, Validating Conformity of the First Amendment to the Meridian Revitalization Plan with the City of Meridian’s Comprehensive Plan - Approved C. Resolution No PZ-20-02. A Resolution of the Planning and Zoning Commission for the City of Meridian, Idaho, Validating Conformity of the Urban Renewal Plan for the Union District Urban Renewal Project with the City of Meridian’s Comprehensive Plan - 5. Action Items Land Use Public Hearing Process: After the Public Hearing is opened the staff report will be presented by the assigned city p lann er. Following Staff's report the applicant has up to 15 minutes to present their application. Each member of the public may provide testimony up to 3 minutes or if they are representing a larger group, such as a Homeowners Association, they may be allowed 10 minutes. The applicant is then allowed 10 additional minutes to respond to the public's comments. No additional public testimony is taken once the public hearing is closed. A. Public Hearing for Delano Subdivision (H-2019-0027) by Boll Cook Investments, LLC, Located at 14120 W. Jasmine Ln. and 2800 E. Jasmine Ln. – Recommend ed Approval to City Council , Hearing Date Scheduled for May 12, 2020 1. Request: Annexation & zoning of 15.22 acres of land with R-8 (2.76 acres), R-15 (8.82 acres) and R-40 (3.64 acres) zoning districts; and, 2. Request: A Preliminary plat consisting of 66 single-family residential building lots, 1 building lot for a future multi-family development, 8 common area lots and 2 other (common driveway) lots. Meeting Adjourned at 9:01 p.m. Meridian Planning and Zoning Meeting April 16, 2020. Meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of April 16, 2020, was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Chairman Ryan Fitzgerald. Members Present: Chairman Ryan Fitzgerald, Commissioner Lisa Holland, Commissioner Bill Cassinelli, Commissioner Andrew Seal, Commissioner Rhonda McCarvel, Commissioner Nick Grove and Commissioner Patricia Pitzer. Others Present: Chris Johnson, Adrienne Weatherly, Andrea Pogue, Bill Parsons, Sonya Allen and Dean Willis. Item 1: Roll-call Attendance X Lisa Holland X Rhonda McCarvel X Andrew Seal X Nick Grove X Patricia Pitzer X Bill Cassinelli X Ryan Fitzgerald - Chairman Fitzgerald: Okay. Well, at this time I would like to call to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning meeting for the date of April 16th and let's start with roll call. Item 2: Adoption of Agenda Fitzgerald: Thank you, ma'am. So, the first item on the agenda is the adoption of the agenda. We don't have any changes to the agenda tonight, so can I get a motion to adopt the agenda as presented? Seal: So moved. Holland: Second. McCarvel: Second. Fitzgerald: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as presented. All those in favor say aye. Any opposed? Okay. Motion passes. Thank you. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 3: Consent Agenda [Action Items] A. Approve Minutes of April 2, 2020, Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 4 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 2 of 54 B. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Hidden Gem Events (H-2020-0015) by Elizabeth Burgess, Located at 134 E. State Ave. Fitzgerald: The next item on the agenda is the Consent Agenda. We have two items on the Consent Agenda, the approval of minutes for the April 2nd, 2020, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and the Findings of Fact and Conclusions the Law for Hidden Gem Events, H-2020-0015. Anything need to be pulled out of there? Hearing none, can I get a motion to accept the Consent Agenda as presented? Seal: So moved. Cassinelli: Second. Fitzgerald: I have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same. Thank you. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Fitzgerald: Okay. So, let me go through -- we welcome all who is on --joining us online during this time of-- we are trying to get the city's work done while we are all in a stay-at- home situation, so we appreciate you being with us tonight. We are bringing this to you via Zoom and online via YouTube. So, let me let you --just kind of walk through how we are going to do this tonight. On your screen you should see the commissioners, who are present -- who are present for this evening's meeting. Also on the call are our staff, the city attorney, and the city clerk's office and the staff from our Planning Department who will be on the call. Everyone else is online on --or Zoom are attendees. You may observe the meeting and we can see that you are there. However, your ability to talk and -- will be muted until such time as we open the public hearing for you to provide testimony. If you have previously sent a presentation for the meeting it will be displayed on the screen. The clerk will run the presentation for you. The clerk is also assisting with bringing up slides for other presentations. So, if you have something that's missing, please, ask us and we will get you squared away. If you simply want to watch the meeting we encourage you to watch through the streaming live the city's YouTube channel. You can access that through meridiancity.org forward slash live where that's being squared away live on -- on -- on our website. When public testimony is open the clerk will call the names of those who signed up to testify on our website and you will be unmuted. The chair will call on you individually. Please state your name and your address for the record and you will have three minutes to address the Commission. After that we may ask your questions for clarification and, then, once done you will be put back on mute and we will go on with the rest of the meeting. Once all those who have -- all those who have signed up in advance or who have called in I will invite any others who wish to testify. If you do wish to testify via Zoom you may press the raise the hand button, which is in the participants down on the bottom of the Zoom app, there is a participants line down there, you can see there is a raise your hand button and if -- if you are only listening or calling through a cell phone or Iandline you can press star nine and that will give you the ability to talk. If you Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 5 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 3 of 54 are listening on multiple devices please check -- please choose one and, then, mute everything else, so we don't get reverberation. Make sure that you are kind of -- we will give you some feedback if there is any challenges. I think I have seen -- the governor went through this during his stay at home order and I felt a little bit bad for him, but we are all working through it during this time and using new technology. So, please, note that we cannot take questions after the public testimony portion. That's our time to deliberate, so we want to make sure that we close the public hearing and if there is questions we can call you up specifically, but we won't have additional questions after we close the public hearing. So, with that let's get started with our fun and exciting evening. I know -- one other thing. If there is an HOA representative, which I think we have one for the Delano Subdivision, we will give you some additional time to speak. We usually have hands raised on those who you will be speaking on behalf of, but because there is not that ability tonight, we are going to give you some extra time to speak on behalf of the HOA and, then, we will move on. But with that, Commissioners, are there any questions on how we are going to proceed? Hopefully we have worked out the kinks in the last round and I appreciate all the staff's efforts to do that. Anybody have any questions? Item 4: Community Items [Action Items] A. Presentation of Staff Report for Urban Renewal Plan for the Union District Urban Renewal Project and First Amendment to the Meridian Revitalization Plan Fitzgerald: Okay. Hearing none, I'm going to open up the first presentation and hand it over to Caleb -- I'm sorry. I think it's -- Cameron, I think you are going to kick us off; is that correct, sir. Arial: That's correct. Mr. -- Mr. Commissioner and Chairman. Yes. Fitzgerald: Cameron, we can barely hear you. Arial: Okay. Is that better, Mr. Chairman? Fitzgerald: A little bit. Is everybody hearing him? Arial: Is that better? Fitzgerald: Yeah. Seal: Better. Fitzgerald: You're good, Cameron. Thank you. Go right ahead, sir. Arial: Okay. Appreciate that, Mr. Chairman. It's a pleasure to be with you all this evening and certainly appreciate all of your efforts and willingness to serve, too. Just from my standpoint I just really appreciate the Commission and your willingness to keep things Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 6 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 4 of 54 moving in the city, albeit under these circumstances in a unique way. So, let me just express first off my appreciation to each of you for your -- your service. This item before you this evening is a long time coming I think is fair to say. The city and the Meridian Development Corporation, as you know, have been working in close concert to accomplish a lot of key goals and strategic initiatives within the city's downtown in particular. A lot of those things pertain to the city's strategic plan, Comprehensive Plan, which is specific to you all this evening, as well as MDC's Destination Downtown revitalization plan. So, what -- what you will be -- what is -- what will be presented to you this evening is a culmination of a -- of many years, if you will, to move our downtown forward in -- in a meaningful way. So, that really is the genesis of-- of the proposal. So, as you may know, the current downtown urban renewal district is scheduled to sunset in six years. Because of that shorter time frame and the way that, you know, urban renewal works with, you know, boundaries being set, the process to go through to establish these districts, there is a lot of time and effort that goes into that and so, really, with this --what's being proposed this evening, which is a de-annexation of a portion of that -- of the -- the existing district and, then, creating a new district, what we are calling the union district, in its place, will effectively extend -- or create a new time horizon for those specific properties. Now, it's important to note that this new district can greatly benefit from some focus, some tender loving care, if you will. As you know there is -- there is sidewalk issues, you know, lighting, sewer and water infrastructure, road infrastructure needs, just to name a few that we are looking to really take a hard look at and move forward. So, that just kind of gives you a taste for what -- what -- what you will be looking at and the background and reason for it. It's important to note as well that we do have our consultants on the phone with us as well. We have Phil Kushlan, our urban renewal consultant, as well as Meghan Conrad, who is our urban renewal attorney on -- on the phone with us as well to speak to any -- any questions you may have on the -- on the technical side. It is also important to note that this is just a step in our process. So, we have gone through the first phases of this, which included an eligibility assessment that was reviewed and approved by both the City Council, as well as the MDC board, and really the purpose of that is to determine, you know, is -- are the properties eligible for urban renewal and under the code there is -- there is ten specific criteria. These properties and this new proposed site met eight of those ten. Granted you only need to meet one to -- you know, under the -- under the strict re -- you know, review of the code to be eligible. Therefore, you know, both, you know, the City Council and -- and MDC board, you know, found that this does make sense to move forward with this plan. So, bringing it current now to you all is really what you are looking at is the land use piece of this. Does this proposed de-annexation and new urban renewal plan adhere to our Comprehensive Plan and with that I'm going to turn it over to Caleb Hood, as you know, is our planning manager and -- who conducted a staff review of the comp plan and how this plan compares to it. So, I will turn that over to Caleb now. Hood: Thank you, Cameron. Mr. Chair, Members of the Commission, I trust you can hear me okay. Wave your hand or something if you can't. Okay. So, thanks again, Cameron. So, yeah, as Cameron just mentioned, Brian McClure in my office and myself did review the union district plan for conformity to the city's Comprehensive Plan. I put it in my memo that you have in your packet. You know, if we were all at City Hall together Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 7 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 5 of 54 we would probably spend a little more time kind of walking you through those policies, but we thought we did a pretty comprehensive job just in that memo covering all the policies related to downtown. As with most development projects, not all Comprehensive Plan policies apply to each project. It's very very rare that you will see a project that hits all of the goals, objectives, and action items that you are trying to accomplish for an area. But we did look at the proposed project area, the redevelopment actions, and the uses explained in there and evaluated those against the Comprehensive Plan policies relative to downtown and put -- and put that analysis in -- in the memo. So, I -- unless you want me to, I'm not prepared to walk through each one of those. We did, again, analyze that. Do believe that the plan is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and we do recommend that you affirm the two resolutions that are the next two action items on your agenda this evening. So, if you have any questions about how we got to --- or the analysis we did within the staff memo, I would certainly stand for any of those questions, but we really did just zero in on, again, the -- the area called out and the actions anticipated with the plan. So, with that, Mr. Chair, a pretty -- pretty simple report this evening. Would stand for any questions you may have. Fitzgerald: Thanks, Caleb. Are there any questions for Caleb or Cameron? Seal: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Seal. Seal: Just in looking at this and some of the intent of the language that's in there as far as what it's trying to accomplish, why isn't the area bigger? Hood: Yeah. And, Mr. Chair, I -- Cameron, if you are still on the line it's probably a better -- I have not been actively involved in the creation of the boundaries of this -- of this area, so if Cameron or someone else may be on the line could answer how they came up with the boundaries, that's probably better than -- than for me to answer. Arial: Or you got it, Caleb. Appreciate the question. Mr. Chairman and Commissioner Seal -- great question. There was actually a lot of discussion around, you know, should we make this bigger, should we take a bigger stab, or should we have it be a more focused district and, really, it kind of came down to, you know, this is a specific piece that we feel needed that specific attention and, you know, with what's being proposed, you know -- you know, as you -- as you may know with --with these sites, both -- not to get too project specific, because, again, that's not what we are debating this evening, but there is an immediate need for that and so we wanted to adhere to the strict, you know, interpretation of urban rural law, which is, you know, let's -- let's pick a site and let's redevelop it and use that -- the tool to make that happen. So, there was a lot of deliberation that went into this and -- and -- and that's how we landed on this particular -- these particular parcels. Fitzgerald: Thanks, Cameron. Additional questions for either Cameron or Caleb? I -- well, I appreciate the kind of strict following of the -- the urban renewal side. I hear that a great deal with the legislature about things are pushing the limits of urban renewal, so we Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 8 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 6 of 54 greatly appreciate the staff taking that into account and using the letter of that law to move forward with. So, thank you for that. I did want to bring up to the Commission before we move forward and put it on the record that I -- my wife serves on the MDC board. I don't feel like that impacts my ability to move -- or vote on this resolution, but I will leave that up to my fellow Commissioners. They may have a problem with my doing double duty in regards to her serving on MDC. Holland: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Holland. Holland: I don't see any concerns if you think you can be impartial. Fitzgerald: Okay. Seal: I concur. Grove: I'm fine. B. Resolution No. PZ-20-01. A Resolution of the Planning and Zoning Commission for the City of Meridian, Idaho, Validating Conformity of the First Amendment to the Meridian Revitalization Plan with the City of Meridian's Comprehensive Plan C. Resolution No. PZ-20-02. A Resolution of the Planning and Zoning Commission for the City of Meridian, Idaho, Validating Conformity of the Urban Renewal Plan for the Union District Urban Renewal Project with the City of Meridian's Comprehensive Plan Fitzgerald: Perfect. Okay. So, in moving that forward we have two resolutions in front of us -- to take kind of the next step in the -- in this process. Are there any questions for legal counsel or for Caleb or Cameron about these specific resolutions we are going to vote on? One is validating conformity of that revitalization plan and I believe the other one is the -- the de-annexation piece, if I'm not mistaken, but I can pull it up in front of me right now. Arial- Yes. That -- Fitzgerald: Any questions for the team? Go right ahead, Cameron. Arial- No. I was just confirming your -- your -- your comment. That is correct. So, you have the de-annexation and, then, the -- the new district plan before you. Holland: Mr. Chair? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 9 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 7 of 54 Fitzgerald: Commissioner Holland. Holland: One more question for Cameron or maybe even legal counsel. So, if you de- annex the piece from the existing urban renewal agency, does it reset your -- your allocation area for your increment? Arial: Mr. Chairman, Lisa, that is correct. So, that -- that goes right along with the time horizon as well. So, effectively, we would be able to use the tax increment for the full new time frame, as opposed to just the six year time frame remaining. Holland: Got it. Okay. Fitzgerald: You're like a person who deals with city stuff all the time. Good job, Commissioner Holland. Holland: Well, I was going to say, I know a fair amount about urban renewal districts these days, so I think it -- I don't really have any big concerns with it. My only question was the same one asked earlier of why not consider a little bit bigger of an area for long term. If you plan to open up a district for 20 years is there more we want to accomplish, but I appreciate the sentiment of trying to follow the intent of urban renewal to do one project area at a time and if you can get done what you need to get done with, close it, and start a new one, because that's the point of the tool, so -- no concerns otherwise on my side. Seal: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Seal, go right ahead. Seal: Just one -- one question on -- one of the concerns raised was that -- I mean -- and it was with art -- some of the depiction of art or picking what art is going to be there as far as different entities having the ability to do that within these districts. How is that going to be mitigated going into this as far -- and that's just a piece of it. I'm sure there is other parts that are going to -- going to face that -- that same issue. Is there -- is there something that will be happening with this in order to kind of lay the groundwork for other districts like this that will come in -- into Meridian as we move forward with things like this? Because -- because I would imagine that this is -- this is going to be a stepped approach where this is going to be a piece and, then, you know, they will identify another piece. So, we want to make sure that there is commonality and flow and, you know, we are all marching to the same beat. Fitzgerald: Caleb, I had a similar question. Do you want to tackle that? Hood: Yeah. I believe I can. Mr. Chair, Commissioner Seal. So, I understand today -- so that was one of the concerns when we put this together was stepping on toes, basically, and just an acknowledgement that the city does have an Arts Commission. So, if public art is going to be a piece of what happens in this area that there be communication Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 10 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 8 of 54 and coordination with our--with other entities that are out there and so there isn't stepping on toes and -- and increased coordination on those types of activities and projects. It's my understanding that -- that -- and I might not get the terminology right, but there has been an addendum to the plan -- an understanding in the plan, anyways, that there will be that coordination going forward and it will be coordinated with our Arts Commission, amongst other -- you know, maybe there is historic preservation for other projects and those types of things. So, I think that's well understood that just -- we need to work together on projects to make sure we are not working cross purposes. Fitzgerald: Commissioner Seal, did you have any follow up there? Seal: No. Thank you. Holland: Mr. Chair,just one comment, too. So, in the process that they are going through, because, again I have done a lot of research on how urban renewal districts are formed lately, they will still have to come back with a district plan of what they hope to accomplish within that and that will come back forward. So, a lot of the things of what specific elements are they going to accomplish and how are they going to accomplish them will come back before us again in the future. Fitzgerald: And that will be a public hearing, as Commissioner Seal's e-mail earlier said, I think will give us an opportunity to see those and have a public hearing around that information. Seal: Okay. Good. Fitzgerald: So, if we take these in order -- unless there is other questions, can I get a motion to approve Resolution PZ-20-01 regarding validating conformity of the First Amendment to the Meridian Revitalization Plan? Holland: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Holland. Holland: The way that staff posed it in here, can we make our motion to approve both resolutions together or do we need to do it as separate motions? Fitzgerald: Andrea. Pogue: This is Andrea Pogue from Legal. You can do it either way. So, staff proposed a combination motion, but it doesn't have to be done that way. It's your choice. Fitzgerald: I'm good either way, so if we are good I'm good with handling it however you want to make a motion. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 11 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 9 of 54 Holland: I think I'm fairly comfortable with what both motions are trying to accomplish, so I'm going to make a motion to combine them together. Fitzgerald: Perfect. Holland: After considering all staff, applicant, and public input, I move to approve Resolution Nos. PZ-20-01 and PZ-20-02 as presented today in the staff report and the Planning and Zoning hearing. McCarvel: Second. Seal: Second. Fitzgerald: I have a motion and a second to approve Resolution PZ-20-01 and PZ-20- 02. All those in favor say aye. Any opposed? Bill, is that a -- or Commissioner Cassinelli, was that an aye? That you are good? Cassinelli: That was an aye. Fitzgerald: Okay. Motion passes. And we appreciate that. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Fitzgerald: Thank you, Cameron and Caleb. We appreciate your guidance and information. We look forward to seeing the plans as they come back forward. Hood: Thank you, Commissioners. Arial: Excellent. Thank you so much. Item 5: Action Items A. Public Hearing for Delano Subdivision (H-2019-0027) by Boll Cook Investments, LLC, Located at 14120 W. Jasmine Ln. and 2800 E. Jasmine Ln. 1. Request: Annexation & zoning of 15.22 acres of land with R- 8 (2.76 acres), R-15 (8.82 acres) and R-40 (3.64 acres) zoning districts; and, 2. Request: A Preliminary plat consisting of 66 single-family residential building lots, 1 building lot for a future multi-family development, 8 common area lots and 2 other (common driveway) lots. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 12 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 10 of 54 Fitzgerald: Okay. Moving on in the hearing. We are going to reopen the public hearing for-- I guess it's maybe continued or, actually, it's remanded back. So, the public hearing for Delano Subdivision, H-2019-0027. And just for staff -- for Commissioner Grove and Commissioner Pitzer, this is --we have seen this one several times and so it's come back before us for reasons I think Sonya will get into, but, Commissioner Pitzer, did you have something you needed to chat with the Commission about, ma'am? Pitzer: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I would like to advise the Commission that I live in an adjoining subdivision of the proposed Delano Sub. Prior to my appointment I attended neighborhood meetings. I attended the P&Z and the City Council meeting in which I testified at those hearings. Since my appointment I have abstained from any other meetings or any conversations surrounding this application and any a-mails that I had received after my appointment have been placed in the public record. I feel I can be open, objective, and impartial and will consider all evidence and testimony with an open mind. However, if my fellow Commissioners do not agree I will understand completely and will respectfully recuse myself. Fitzgerald: Thank you. Is there any comments from the -- or questions from fellow Commissioners? Holland: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Holland. Holland: I don't think I have any concerns as long as she can be impartial, but I would look to Legal for their input if we need to worry about it. Pogue: This is Andrea. Commissioner Pitzer did consult with Legal and we advised her if she wanted to do exactly what she did and felt she could be impartial and objective and keep an open mind through the hearing that she could go forward if she so chose and the body agreed. Fitzgerald: Commissioner Pitzer, we really appreciate your providing us all the documentation and a-mails that you have gotten, so that we could be on the same page and this allows us to have the same amount of information that you have gotten as well. So, I feel comfortable that you can stand and -- and be objective in the discussion. So, I have no problem. Does anyone else have any concerns? McCarvel: None. Fitzgerald: Okay. Grove: No. Fitzgerald: Perfect. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 13 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 11 of 54 Cassinelli: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Cassinelli. Cassinelli: Yeah. I want to just kind of add on that. I -- there were some a-mails that I sent out with some questions, basically, and I just want to be clear that those -- the questions I had -- they were questions and -- and don't reflect any partiality I may have. I can certainly remain impartial. I just wanted to just draw that out and address that, because I did ask some questions. Fitzgerald: But I think all the Commissioners were on those a-mails that we received them, so I think we are all -- and they were posed in a question format and not an opinion format, so I think we are good there, unless there is concerns among the Commission. Holland: Mr. Chair, I believe they were also added to the public record, so anyone has access to those -- that chain. Fitzgerald: Yes. Absolutely. Thank you for that information, Commissioner Cassinelli. Any other concerns out there? Okay. I will turn to Sonya to kick us off. You want to start this up with the staff report, ma'am. If you -- you have to unmute yourself though. Allen: Oh, I think I'm unmuted now. Are we good? Fitzgerald: You are good. Go for it. Allen: I think the clerk is controlling that, so -- anywho. Thank you, Mr. Chair, Members of the Commission. The applications before you are a request for annexation and zoning and a preliminary plat. This site consists of 15.21 acres of land. It's zoned RUT in Ada county and it's located at 2800 and 14120 West Jasmine Lane. This project was originally heard by the Commission last year back in -- May 2nd and July 18. At the hearing on July 18th the Commission voted to recommend denial of the project to City Council. The Council heard the project on November 12th and voted to remand the project back to the Commission to address the density issue of the proposed development and for Commission's review of a revised plat with changes to lots along the northern boundary of the subdivision that front on East Della Street, consisting of single story detached homes and the loss of one buildable lot. The revised plans before you tonight are the result of discussions at the City Council hearings and meetings with the neighbors. The revisions include a reduction in the number of buildable lots from 85 to 66. The change to the proposed zoning. The portion of the site along the north and west boundaries previously proposed to be zoned R-15 is now R-8 and a change to the conceptual building elevations. Since the hearing at City Council in November the city adopted a new Comprehensive Plan, which included an amendment to the future land use map that assigned a mixed use regional designation to the majority of the property that lies east of the proposed Centrepoint Way. Therefore, the previous application for an amendment to the future land use map is no longer needed and has been withdrawn. This area was formerly in the city of Boise's planning area, but last October Boise city council approved Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 14 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 12 of 54 a resolution to amend the land use map of Blueprint Boise to transfer this area from Boise's area of city impact to the City of Meridian's area city impact boundary, since Meridian is able to provide water and sewer services to the property. So, that's the -- that's the update and the background on this and I will just proceed forward with what's proposed with the current plan. Again, the Comprehensive Plan future land use map designation for the portion west of the proposed extension of Centrepoint is medium density residential, which calls for three to eight dwelling units per acre and mixed use regional on the east side of Centrepoint. The applicant is requesting annexation and zoning of 3.31 acres of land with R-8 zoning for the portion of the site adjacent to the north and west boundaries, with R-15 zoning of the 8.12 acres directly to the south and east of the R-8 portion. The five acres on the east side of the proposed extension of Centrepoint Way is proposed to be zoned R-40. The proposed zoning is consistent with the proposed development plan and the future land use map designations for this site. A preliminary plat is proposed consisting of 66 single family residential building lots for the development of single family residential detached homes at a gross density of 5.7 units per acre. One building lot is for a future 96 unit multi-family residential development, for which a concept plan is depicted on the landscape plan, at a gross density of 27 units per acre. Eight common lots are proposed and two other lots for common driveways on a total of 15.22 acres of land. The plat is proposed to develop in three phases. There is a phasing plan down on the screen on the bottom left. The first phase is on the west side of the proposed Centrepoint Way and will include the extension of North Dashwood Place at the north boundary through the site to Centrepoint Way. The second phase is on the west side of the development and the third phase is the multi-family on the east side of Centrepoint. This plan as I noted before is conceptual and the use will require approval of the subsequent conditional use permit. Staff recommends North Centrepoint Way is extended to the north boundary of the site, along with construction of a street buffer and detached sidewalk on the east side of North Centrepoint Way with the first phase of development. This will allow the connection to Wainwright Drive to the north to occur sooner if the Wong property, which is the abutting property to the north, redevelops before the multi-family residential portion of the site develops. There have been many letters of testimony received from adjacent residential property owners to the north regarding the amount of traffic that will be generated from the proposed development and routed through their neighborhood. For this reason it is imperative that the Centrepoint Way connection to Wainwright occur as soon as possible. The applicant did provide a concept drawing, shown in the upper left, showing how development could possibly occur on the Wong parcel with the extension of Centrepoint to the north to the commercial area, eventually extending to Wainwright consistent with the master street map in the location proposed on this site. If you will go back one slide, Adrienne, please. One access is proposed on either side of -- excuse me. Back one more. On either side of Centrepoint Way, a collector street, and an emergency only pedestrian access is proposed from the extension of North Dashwood Place at the north boundary of the site. A stub street is proposed to the parcel to the west for future -- for access and future extension. Public streets are proposed within the single family residential portion of the development with 27 foot wide street sections. Private drive aisles will be provided within the multi-family residential portion of the development. In accord with UDC 11-3A-3, which limits access points to collector streets to improve safety and requires access to be taken from a local Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 15 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 13 of 54 street if available, staff is recommending North Dashwood Place is extended as a full street section into the site with the first phase of development. And just to note, ACHD approved the connection of Dashwood Avenue to the existing stub street to the north, Dashwood Place, as a temporary emergency access and pedestrian connection until Centrepoint Way is extended to Wainwright Drive or within ten years, whichever occurs first. When Centrepoint Way is extended to Wainwright Drive, Dashwood Place will be reconstructed as a public street for vehicular connectivity to Wainwright Drive. UDC -- actually, let me have you go back I believe one slide, please, Adrienne. Yes. UDC 11- 3A-3 requires all subdivisions to provide local street access to any use that currently takes direct access from an arterial or a collector street. The parcel to the east of the property proposed to be rezoned R-40 on the east side of Centrepoint -- and that is the one on the drawing on the lower right-hand side with the property with the star on it. That's just off site. Again, they -- they currently take access from State Highway 69, Eagle Road. It's an arterial street and a state highway. Staff recommends that local street access or driveway with a cross-access easement is provided to the property to the east as set forth in the UDC. The applicant should coordinate with the developer of that property on a location for the access street or driveway. And, then, if you go next -- right there. Thank you. Twenty-seven foot wide street sections are proposed, which only allow parking on one side of the street. A parking plan was submitted that -- as shown that demonstrates the amount of available on-street parking, which is 58 spaces, as well as the location of such spaces and, then, again, there are, of course, off-street parking spaces provided for each home in accord with UDC standards as well. A 20 foot wide landscape street buffer is required along Centrepoint Way, a collector street. A minimum of ten percent qualified open space is required to be provided for the overall development, along with one site amenity. The applicant is proposing 10.8 percent on the single family portion of the site, consisting of a .69 acre park with amenities, parkways, linear open space and a collector street buffer. Because the multi-family residential portion of the site is separated from the single family portion by a collector street and the development plan is conceptual at this time, staff is recommending as a DA provision that the ten percent open space is provided on that portion of the site at the time of development in addition to the open space required in the specific use standards for multi-family residential developments. A shade structure, children's play structure, climbing dome, climbing boulders, seating benches and public art are proposed as qualified amenities for the site, which do exceed UDC standards. The Nourse Lateral runs along the northern boundary of the sight and is piped. An easement should be depicted on the plat for the waterway if one exists. Staff is unsure. If there is an easement and the width is ten feet or greater, it should be located within a common lot that is a minimum 20 feet wide and outside of a fenced area, unless otherwise modified by City Council. The elevations shown are the original elevations here that were submitted with the application. Since that time the applicant has submitted a new concept building elevations for the single family residential detached homes as shown. All single family homes along the west and north perimeter boundaries of the development are restricted to a single story in height as proposed by the applicant previously. The concept elevations for the apartments did not change. There have been many -- many letters of written testimony submitted on this application on both the original and the revised plans from the public and those are all contained in the public record for reference. Hethe Clark, the applicant's representative, submitted a response to the most recent staff report. He Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 16 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 14 of 54 is in agreement with the staff report conditions, except for two items as follows: He was requesting a modification to development agreement provision 1-D, as in David, to not restrict the homes along the west boundary of the subdivision to a single story as previously proposed, to allow two story homes to be constructed and deletion of condition number 2-13, as in boy, which requires construction of the 20 foot wide street buffer and detached sidewalk along the east side of Centrepoint to be constructed with the first phase of development to be deferred until the multi-family portion of the site develops. They are in agreement with the extension of Centrepoint as a full street section to the north boundary of the property. Staff is recommending approval of the proposed project with the requirement of a development agreement per the provisions in the staff report. Staff will stand for any questions. Fitzgerald: Thanks, Sonya. Are there questions for staff? Holland: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Holland. Holland: Sonya, can you tell us, again, what the number was for that second condition they wanted struck from the staff report? Allen: Yeah. It is in your hearing outline on the written testimony. It is condition number 2-13, as in boy. Holland: Okay. Thank you. Allen: Yep. Cassinelli: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Cassinelli, go right ahead, sir. Cassinelli: Sonya, can you -- can you just go over the connection to Dashwood again, so that I'm clear on that. Allen: Staff is recommending that it's extended to Centrepoint with the first phase of development. Cassinelli: Dashwood. The connection to Dashwood. Allen: Yes. Staff is recommending that it's extended from the north boundary to Centrepoint Way with the first phase of development. Cassinelli: Okay. And, then, what happens -- and, then, eventually it becomes just an emergency access and pedestrian? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 17 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 15 of 54 Allen: No. Staff -- it is a public stub street, which was intended to be extended with development. City code requires that all stub streets be extended. Fitzgerald: Additional questions? Seal: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Seal. Seal: Just a question on the -- the Nourse Lateral. The question on that where if that -- if that needs to be a 20 foot wide outside of a fenced area in a common lot, is -- is that going to fit in their plat that's shown here or how -- I mean is that basically something that they are going to have to figure out how to do? Allen: Mr. Chair, Members of the Commission, I have asked the applicant about that. I -- as I recall I never received an answer on whether an easement exists for the Nourse Lateral or not, so that would be a good question for the applicant. And, yes, I think that it would significantly affect their plat if a 20 foot wide common lot was required. But, yeah, the applicant should respond to that question. Seal: Okay. Thank you. Fitzgerald: Commissioner Cassinelli, did you have a follow-up, sir? I didn't mean to cut you off. Cassinelli: I'm just -- I'm -- when I'm reading the -- the summary here, I'm just not clear on -- on that. It's saying that ACHD approved the connection of Dashwood to the existing stub street to the north as a temporary emergency access pedestrian connection until Centrepoint Way is extended to Wainwright or within ten years. So, I guess I'm just -- I'm confused on that. Allen: You have -- Mr. Chair, I'm sorry. Commissioner Cassinelli, Commissioners, you have two different jurisdictions with different requirements. Our city code requires that it be extended. ACHD has taken a more lenient approach on it. The more restrictive applies. Fitzgerald: Commissioner Cassinelli, did you have some follow up? Cassinelli: No. That -- that makes sense. Allen: If the Commission and Council do not wish for Dashwood to be extended, then, that -- that's a decision that they need to make and include in the staff report conditions. Fitzgerald: Thanks, Sonya. Other additional questions for staff? Holland: Mr. Chair? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 18 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 16 of 54 Fitzgerald: Commissioner Holland. Holland: Just to clarify. So, if Centrepoint Way goes through at some point it would still connect to that other collector up to the north -- that Dashwood would also connect to, it just gives two points of connection out of that subdivision; is that correct? Allen: Chairman, Commissioner, yes, that is correct. Wainwright Drive. Holland: Okay. Thank you. Fitzgerald: Additional questions? Okay. Hethe is -- or Chris or Adrienne, can we get Hethe available to speak to us. Clark: Hi, guys. Can everyone hear me? Fitzgerald: Yes, sir. Thank you forjoining us. Please state your name and your address for the record and the floor is yours, sir. Clark: Thank you. Hethe Clark. 251 East Front Street. Representing the applicant. And, Chris, do you have the ability to get my PowerPoint up? Johnson: It's up for you now and I have just given you control. Clark: Okay. I think I have still got Sonya's up right now. There we go. Got it. Thank you. Okay. So, of course, we are here to talk about Delano Subdivision. As a -- kind of give you a little bit more context for the location. This is just off of Eagle Road, north of Ustick near the Dick's and Hobby Lobby shopping areas. So, of course, it's near major transportation corridors and as well has proximity to shopping. Sorry. A little lag here. Also emphasize a couple of the Comprehensive Plan components as Sonya -- Sonya mentioned. The area we are going to be discussing tonight is the medium density residential component. While the area to the east is the mixed use regional, those designations are per the new land use map. They match the prior Boise city planning for the area on the east. It also matches the much more dense project that was previously approved on our south. I do want to clarify a little bit and maybe remind everybody how we got here. It's my understanding that this project was recommended for denial last year by the Planning and Zoning Commission, because the Planning and Zoning Commission wanted to see resolution on the area of impact boundaries between Boise city and Meridian. After the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing occurred, that's when I got involved. We went to the -- to Boise city and Boise city agreed to the area of impact modification. That all occurred prior to going to Meridian City Council for their consideration of this application. When this was up before Meridian, the City Council, there was a great deal of debate. It led to remand on two issues. Again, that was the density and the other issue that came up was this connection to Dashwood. Since that time the prior applicant group is vacated. There is a new applicant group that's come in. They have asked me to represent them and I am taking on a role in which I'm pretty dangerous, because I -- I'm kind of pretending to be a planner here a little bit and Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 19 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 17 of 54 managing this in a way that I don't typically, but what we -- what I did once -- kind of took the reins on this project was to first schedule a meeting with the Alpine Pointe HOA board. We met in December of 2019 and what you can see on your meeting -- or on your screen is the -- the full size sheet of the prior application. What I did was I spread it out on the table with the board members and we just had a conversation about what the board's priorities would be with the -- with the remanded plat. You can see the -- the notes here on the -- on the document and what we talked about was a reduction in density overall. We talked about reducing density in particular on the north boundary and -- but still retaining the limitation to a single story. We also talked about an emergency connection -- excuse me -- only Dashwood and to make the primary access to the subdivision on Centrepoint. If you will recall that was inverted with the prior application. The prior application was going to have a gate at Centrepoint and the primary access would have been at Dashwood. Other items that were identified were cross-access to the future multi- family, R-40 area to the east. You can see my hand scrawled notes there. And, then, we also talked about reorienting the internal lots within the subdivision. So, we went to work, modified the plan and this is what the -- I wanted you to be able to see them kind of side by side here. As you can see the density is reduced. The primary connection is now down on Centrepoint. The internal lots are reoriented and the park is still facing Alpine Pointe, but it's been increased in size. So, this is the plan I took back to the board in late December for a second meeting. Here is some more detail on that. There was a reduction from 85 to 66 lots or about 22 percent. Again, the relocation of the primary access. The emergency only access at North Dashwood. And I will -- Commissioner Cassinelli, I will talk about that some more and, hopefully, we can make sure that everybody understands our perspective on that. The north boundary lots were reduced and we will talk about that some more, but we retained the single story limit, despite the reduction. The internal lots have been reoriented, so they -- they are east-west, rather than north-south. And, then, again, the park was expanded. So, this is the revised plan. I -- after meeting with the board twice I took this to the Alpine Pointe HOA general meeting in February of 2020. Felt good coming out of those meetings that we were largely on the same page. I think most people had appreciated what we have done. There are some additional comments that have come in since then and I'm -- and I'm -- I intend to address those as we go here. A couple items in addition to point out. For example, you know, based on the reduction in density and the neighbor comments, we no longer have attached product in the -- in the -- in the project. Everything is single family detached. So, we updated the elevations as a result. Sonya mentioned the neighborhood amenities. Despite the reduction in the density, the neighborhood amenities have remained. We have five more than what's required, including what I think is a pretty cool proposal for an art installation and seating area down in the southwest corner of the project. Show you where that is. So, that is down here. That -- I would note that that is not counted in the city's open space calculation, for better or for worse. Even without that being we counted we are still above the minimums. But this piece and this piece we are not counting and that's something -- Sonya and I will just debate another day. But we meet the minimums anyway. So, moving forward, these -- the kind of primary concerns as I perceived them in reading the record it focused on a couple of general themes. One was a desire for larger lots on the northern boundary and to make the -- the second would be to make the Dashwood emergency-- or the Dashwood access emergency only on a permanent basis. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 20 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 18 of 54 So, let's talk about the northern boundary first. We have reduced the number of lots on the northern boundary from 15 to 11. Previously there were five duplexes as well within that 15. So, you have a 25 percent decrease in the number of lots, approximately, and we increased the square -- average square footage of those lots from about 3,800 to about 56 -- or, actually, 5,661 square feet. That's the average. And I want to talk a little bit about that in context. There is a lot of transition to cover in only about 600 feet north to south for this project. We have to transition from Alpine Pointe three units to the acre all the way to the Brickyard developments multi-family density of 22 units to the acre. It's a -- it's a lot of ground to cover in terms of transitioning the project and just to give you a little bit more context, this is -- these are some photos from the Brickyard project to our south. I'm sure you are familiar with it. But this will tell you -- kind of show you the -- the density transition that we have to deal with here. So, we are going from a very very dense project on the south up to Alpine Pointe. We think that we have transitioned this appropriately. We have given up a number of lots on that northern boundary. You know, we think that this is -- is an appropriate compromise when it comes to that. So, next point is the -- the Dashwood stub and I think -- we can't talk about this without having a little bit of the -- of the context that we are coming from and I think we kind of witnessed that in Sonya's comments during the staff report. The -- as you know, Meridian and ACHD require connectivity. Meridian's Comprehensive Plan is filled with it, with references to conductivity. ACHD's comprehensive -- policy manual is the same way. There is an existing stub and existing ACHD right of way at Dashwood. Now as -- as we were directed by Council and at the urging of Alpine Pointe, we revisited the question of access, both the primary access at Centrepoint -- or -- yeah, excuse me, Centrepoint and the emergency access at Dashwood. I asked ACHD if we could have an emergency only access there. I did not propose that it be temporary. At the time of the neighborhood meeting on February 18th we did not yet have ACHD's decision. I let the group know that my initial conversations with ACHD were encouraging, but we needed to get ACHD's decision. I also explained the difficulty in light of the existing policies. I explained that if folks would like to have Dashwood vacated there is all -- there is -- there is a process to do that north of our property, but that is outside of our control. I talked about that process. Two days later on February 20th ACHD issued their updated decision. They agreed to the emergency only, but would only do so on a temporary basis. There are a lot of reasons for that, including the policy promoting connectivity and I just can't emphasis -- emphasize this enough. Getting ACHD to agree to limiting this to emergency only on a temporary basis was a pretty significant thing and I considered it a significant win on behalf of the neighbors that had asked for that. This raises a few other points in kind of transition -- transitioning from there. Maybe if that slide will come with me. Chris, do I still have control? Johnson: Yes, you do. Sorry. I'm trying to get control to unmute. Clark: There we go. I think it's waking up now. There we go. So, that leads to a couple of other points. After the ACHD decision came down I became aware of that Alpine -- the Alpine Pointe neighbors were not happy with it being temporary. I went back and asked again. ACHD said, no, they won't agree to that being a permanent emergency only. There has been several alternative layouts that have been floated. I have -- as I review Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 21 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 19 of 54 those I kind of see a common theme there and that would be a connection of Della Street out to Centrepoint. Della is on the -- in the northern area of our property. So, I discussed that with ACHD and they indicated they would not permit Della Street to punch through to the east given the current approved road configuration and, then, third, I talked to ACHD about if we --whether we could enter into a license agreement to landscape within Dashwood on our side of the property try to make it look less -- like less of a road in the -- in the short term. You know, again, trying to give some more comfort to the neighbors. The answer there, again, was no. So, I have tried to be very responsive to the neighbors' concerns. I feel like we have gotten them what we can that's within our power. I have no objection whatsoever to a permanent emergency closure and, you know, the Alpine Pointe neighbors can certainly petition to vacate Dashwood and maybe with that they could get a different result, but I feel like I have pushed that as far as I can. Our -- what we are showing on our plans -- and I think to resolve Commissioner Cassinelli's confusion there, what we are showing on our plans is emergency bollards and -- and a pedestrian- bicycle connection for as long as ACHD will allow it. So, I will try to wrap up there and, then, certainly happy to answer any questions. We do believe that this is in accord with the Comprehensive Plan. We believe that this satisfies each of the -- each of the -- excuse me -- the requirements of the various agencies. You know, I think I would be remiss if I didn't emphasize that this is in-fill development in a very appropriate location. That we know that that's a City of Meridian priority and I will just also emphasize that we have -- we feel like we have made significant modifications to satisfy the concerns that were raised by the neighbors and to address the items that were direct--we were directed toward on this remand. And, then, with that -- hopefully this is helpful for you all. Sonya mentioned the conditions of approval that we had asked to modify. Again, we are not asking to modify the single story limitation on the north. That would stay. We are asking to remove it on the west. We have reduced our density significantly. The property to the west, as we understand it, has been purchased for development. We think it makes sense to keep that on the north, but we would ask to remove that from the west. And, then, with regard to condition 2-B, I don't know if you had the opportunity to review my letter. As Sonya mentioned, we have no issue with constructing all of the road section of Centrepoint within that -- the first phase. That's -- that's -- we agree that that makes sense. What we are asking for is -- is based on the likelihood of throwaway construction. As has been mentioned a number of times, the multi-family portion of the project requires a conditional use permit. What that means is it hasn't been designed, it hasn't been engineered, it hasn't been entitled and it is highly likely that landscape and sidewalk that gets installed before that process occurs is going to be throw away. There is nothing to connect to now. We would ask that we be able to do that at this -- at the time of development of the multi-family piece and so I think the easiest way to address that would be just simply to delete condition 2-B. With that I will wrap up and I'm happy to answer questions. Fitzgerald: Thanks, Hethe. We appreciate it. Are there questions for the applicant? Holland: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Holland. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 22 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 20 of 54 Holland: The area that's to the west perimeter of the boundary of your development, you have mentioned that there was someone who was underdeveloped -- or had purchased it and is going to come forward with development. That area is proposed as residential, I believe, on the future use map and maybe this is a question for staff, but do we know what -- what type of residential is recommended there on the future use map? Is it R-4, R-8 or just kind of medium density? Clark: Mr. Chair, Commissioner Holland, I believe it's all medium density on the future use -- on the land use map. Holland: Okay. Parsons: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Cassinelli, go right ahead. Oh, is that Bill? Parsons: Yeah. This is Bill from Planning. I can -- I can elaborate with Lisa, because I have actually spoken to the new owner of the property and so, yeah, their -- their vision is to keep the existing residence at some point in the future and convert that into -- almost like an event center for outdoor events, for weddings, because of the -- how nice the property is and, then, add some more patio homes into the area. So, yeah, his vision is to go R-8 at some point in the future. At least those are the discussions that I have had -- high level discussions I have had with the new owner. Holland: Thanks, Bill. Fitzgerald: Additional questions for the applicant? Pitzer: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Pitzer, go ahead. Pitzer: Thank you. I believe that to the east of this project where the multi-family is, a new -- it's a city of Boise and there was a sign out there for a three story senior home out there and they are requesting connectivity to -- through Jasmine. Are we working with -- is Mr. Hethe working with them on that connectivity? Clark: Mr. Chair, Commissioner Pitzer, yes, and our plan shows cross-access and we are in communications with them. We have no issues whatsoever with the staff's recommendation on that to ensure that cross-access is provided. Fitzgerald: And I want to caution us all that we need to focus on this application. I know we -- we want to know what's going on around us, but for the applicant and for everybody around them, we need to focus on this application, so -- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 23 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 21 of 54 Pitzer: Right. I -- and I was -- I was questioning that as to the amount of traffic that would, then, be routed through there -- through Dashwood. Fitzgerald: The challenge is we don't know what comes. That could get denied and -- much like Commissioner Holland said, we -- we can't provide conjecture and guess, we have got to deal with what's there now. That's the challenge with in-fill. I mean that's -- that's something we are going to deal with in this conversation. So, let's be careful on how we approach that, because it -- Hethe and his folks he represents can't deal with what's not approved around him. So, let's be careful on how we approach that. Pitzer: Okay. Sorry. Fitzgerald: No, you are fine. I don't -- don't mind the question, just want to make sure we are -- we are being fair to the applicant and the folks around them. Pitzer: Correct. Also, a follow-up question. Mr. Hethe, are you aware that -- and I'm sure you are, if you were at the meeting, but I'm looking over at what the remand was and that Mr. Conger, when it was -- when asked said we don't want a denial. If you are telling us to look back at the northern boundary, he would do traditional lots similar to what's across the street. Do you feel that the density that you have there is what the Council asked and what Mr. Conger agreed to? Clark: Mr. Chair, Commissioner Pitzer, I -- I'm not aware of any specific direction that was provided there by the Council. In other words, the Council didn't say go identify a specific number. Again, we have a new group here. We have, again, reduced that from 15 to 11 and increased the size by 50 percent. I would also note that it would be -- in any event it would be very difficult to match up those lot lines against Alpine Pointe, because if you look at the overhead map, those are pie piece lots to a certain degree, where they -- they -- on the -- the two roadways east and west of the -- of Dashwood, those are cul- de-sacs there and they open up pretty wide on the backside. So, you know, we have to transition, you know, from -- again, from Brickyard all the way up to -- to Alpine Pointe and I do think that this is an appropriate compromise. Pitzer: Okay. Thank you. No, I think you did a great job as far as reducing the density. I was just wondering -- the lot size against that northern boundary, if you thought that they will be modified to what our City Council was requesting. Clark: Right. And I -- and I -- and I'm not aware of any specific direction from the Council. I think the Council direct -- did a remand to revisit that and, then, we spent the time to do that to -- you know, hear folks out and, then, come up with an alternative proposal and that's what you have before you. Pitzer: Okay. Thank you. Allen: Mr. Chair? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 24 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 22 of 54 Fitzgerald: Commissioner McCarvel. Allen: That's Sonya, actually. Fitzgerald: Oh. Sorry. I apologize. Allen: Thank you. If I may respond to Commissioner Pitzer's earlier comments on the assisted living facility that's being constructed in the city of Boise adjacent to the site on the east. If I understood her correctly, she was -- I believe she was inquiring about access to that property. That is actually directly related to this application and I did cover it in my intro. Properties that have direct access to arterial or a state highway such as that -- when we get properties in for development like this, we require -- our code requires that they provide access to such properties via either a local street or a cross-access easement driveway. So, staff is recommending as a provision of this application conditions of approval that either -- either a cross-access easement with a driveway is provided to that property, so that they can have access to Centrepoint or a local street is provided. I'm guessing they will do a cross-access easement, but that--that is a condition of the staff report. So, I just wanted to clarify that. Fitzgerald: Thank you for clarifying. And, Commissioner Pitzer, I apologize if I got crossways in understanding what you were asking. If it's already being built that definitely is something we need to take into account. So, thank you for clarifying for both of us. Pitzer: Yes. Cassinelli: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Cassinelli, go right ahead. Cassinelli: Hethe, in your conversations with ACHD about the pedestrian and emergency access to Dashwood, did you get a feeling that -- I mean they are allowing it to be temporary. They are -- and I'm talking about ACHD and not City of Meridian right now. But ACHD was -- it was okay with that being temporary for up to ten years. Did you get the impression that five years from now they can be flexible in making that permanent? Clark: Mr. Chair, Commissioner Cassinelli, you know, I have been in the development world for long enough that I always have maybe unwarranted optimism that I can get through any obstacle. You know, I didn't ask that specific question, you know, would you be open in five years, because it's -- it's just hypothetical. But I -- you know, I think that that is certainly-- if folks want to see that continue they--they should go, you know, knock on ACHD's door and see if they wouldn't allow it to continue. I think the ten years, if I were to guess, is based on the time limit for their road trust, because as -- as has been mentioned in the staff report and in ACHD's documents, we -- we have to actually put up money to allow ACHD to complete the connection later on and that goes into this road trust and that road trust has a ten year term on it. I would guess that that might be where Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 25 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 23 of 54 that's coming from, but, you know, certainly folks should feel free to go have that conversation again later on. Cassinelli: Thank you. Seal: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Seal. Seal: Just as a follow on to that, it's -- it's actually -- I mean it's ten years or when Centrepoint Way is extended onto Wainwright. That's -- that's what ACHD agreed to, according to what -- what I'm reading and, then, a question for the applicant that -- it's the same question I asked staff, which is the Nourse Lateral that runs along the northern boundary as far as what is the easement on that and -- and how is that going to be addressed? Clark: Yeah. Mr. Chair, Commissioner Seal, I apologize, I meant to address that. So, we have been in touch with the Nourse Lateral folks. We have reviewed the Alpine Pointe plat. The Alpine Pointe plat includes a 15 foot easement for the Nourse Lateral. It's our understanding that that was built in pipes with the construction of Alpine Pointe. Just to be safe, we are proposing to put additional easement ground on our side of the fence just in case any additional is needed, but we -- we believe that that's been fully constructed and the plat for Alpine Pointe shows a chosen easement on -- for the lateral. Seal: So, will that be -- I mean right now it's not depicted on the plat at all as far as the -- the plan you are going to provide for that will be depicted on the final plat that you submit? Clark: Correct. Seal: And a question for staff. Is that -- is that something that we would need to add into a motion that we put in in order to make sure it's in there or is that good enough? Allen: I cannot remember, Chairman, Commissioners, if that is in the staff report or not. I'm looking. Parsons: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Go ahead, Bill. Parsons: Yeah. I was just going to maybe expand upon that as Sonya looks at that condition of approval. So, certainly, as Sonya mentioned to you in her staff report this evening, if it's greater than ten feet we are going to want that in a common lot, but the applicant does have the ability to ask for that to remain on part -- as part of the buildable lot as he goes through the public hearing process. So, let's go ahead and see what Sonya finds with her condition of approval. If we think he's going to dedicate 15 feet and as -- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 26 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 24 of 54 as he moves forward to City Council you may want to include a condition that Council takes action on that or either stay with staff's recommendation and ask for a revised plat to see it in the common lot or if you feel comfortable moving it forward with them going before City Council with a recommendation of it being an easement on the -- on the back of the buildable lots. That makes a lot of sense. Clark: Mr. Chair, if I could -- oh, sorry, Bill. Parsons: Yeah. If-- if you look at the plat that's the surrounding plat with them, we didn't get that with Zebulon Heights, so I'm not sure what we are going to gain with having a common lot along the back of those rear lots. There is -- there is really no benefit at this point. We should have gotten it with the previous plat, but that code was not in effect at the time that Alpine Pointe or Zebulon Heights came through the process. So, just to give you a little bit of context on that as you -- as Sonya looks at that condition. What did you find, Sonya? Allen: Chairman, Commissioners, condition of approval number 2-A states that the -- on the revisions to the plat to depict an easement for the Nourse Lateral along the north boundary of the site and, then, it just goes into the code requirement. If the easement is ten feet or -- or greater it has to be located in a common lot. It's a minimum of 20 feet wide and outside of a fenced area, unless otherwise modified by Council. Parsons: Okay. Fitzgerald: And, Hethe, did you have a comment there? Clark: I did. Sorry to interrupt, Bill. Mr. Chair, just to add to that, I believe that Mr. Sevak -- Ran Sevak of the Perkins Nourse Lateral sent in a letter -- I think it was on -- it's dated the 11th and he also confirmed that those structures are all on the north side of our boundary. They are all on the Alpine Pointe side. But, again, you know, if there is additional ground or easement ground that's required, we -- we don't have any issue with -- with Sonya's condition as it's currently stated. Fitzgerald: Additional questions for Hethe? Seal: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Seal, go ahead. Seal: I hate to keep beating on this one, but with that Nourse -- Nourse Lateral if-- if that ended up eating into the lots is that going to do it in such a way that it's going to change, you know, something about the structure of the lot that makes it less than what it is in terms of regulation? Meaning does it -- does it make the lots too -- too small to put on the size of houses that you are wanting to put on there I guess? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 27 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 25 of 54 Clark: Mr. Chair, Commissioner Seal, the -- if I understand your question correctly -- and just to just state this one -- to try to be as clear as I can. There is a 15 foot easement on the Alpine Pointe plat. The pipeline was built within that 15 foot easement. We are willing to grant additional easement ground on our side, but that won't affect--that doesn't create a -- as long as we stay within the boundaries that Sonya -- that Sonya described earlier, which is that ten foot limit, it doesn't need to be in a common lot. So, it doesn't affect the lot size. Seal: Okay. Thank you for the clarification. Fitzgerald: Hethe, is that going into a plat note that -- that a portion of the back fence is unbuildable or is just for informational -- Clark: Yeah. Commissioner -- Mr. Chair, it would be like any utility easement. Fitzgerald: Yes. Okay. Clark: It would show as, you know, that area on the -- on the plat as -- as -- yeah, that's it's reserved for those utility uses. Fitzgerald: Okay. Thank you. Any additional questions for the applicant? And, Commissioner Pitzer, again, I apologize for the confusion earlier. You had a very valid question and I got confused in that one. So, appreciate that. With that, Madam Clerk, do we have a list of folks who would -- that have signed up that would like to testify? And, Hethe, I will come back to you after, so you can close. Weatherly: Mr. Chair, we do have five people signed in. One of which represents a homeowner's association, and that would be Malissa Bernard. Fitzgerald: Okay. Do you want to unmute Malissa and we will let her kick it off for an extended period of time. Malissa, I think you are unmuted. You want to kick us off and introduce yourself and your -- give us your address for the record, please, ma'am. Bernard: Yes, sir. My name is Malissa Bernard. I live at 4025 North Dashwood. Can you hear me? Fitzgerald: Yes, ma'am, we can. Bernard: Okay. And I -- that's in Meridian. 83646. 1 just wanted to touch on a few points that I have heard. We did ask Hethe for a permanent vacation. You can see that on the note of the original meeting that we had back in December of 2019. We asked for a closure of Dashwood to vehicles in perpetuity. This is very important, because this is based on the de facto collector or cut-through traffic possibilities. Also this plan changes based on the way the realignment of lots happen. You are going to have a fork in the road, so to speak, from Centrepoint Way up through Delano to Dashwood and you are going to a very high density, lots of in-fill, lots of traffic. They are going to find any way to Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 28 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 26 of 54 get to where they need to go quicker. I -- we think that this should be something that's done in the preliminary plat phase. We believe that should be recommended to Council to vacate the stub at Dashwood and start the process right now with the city, not something after ACHD. As we know we are kind of overconnected at this point. I would also say the closure could be achieved through a gate. There is one at Settlers Bridge that's emergency only and how that occurs is they have a simple patent -- padlock there for the Fire Department or we do -- as we must have connectivity we could have emergency only, bike-pedestrian, and it needs to be in perpetuity for this to work. I also in Hethe notes at the initial meeting we had a minimum of 6,000 square feet as a starting lot. Hethe said the average of the lots to the north are 5,661 square feet. This is something that most neighbors adjacent to the border would like that to be rejected and also an additional ingress-egress is possible at the extension of Della. I have seen some traffic there between ACHD and the Commission. With re-jig of Centrepoint Way this could be achieved and also point four would be two story or more transitional product on the Cook parcel. We are oversaturated with three stories, high density, really packing it in on all this in-fill. In-fill is important, but we also have to be careful with that. Fitzgerald: And, Malissa, we have your slides up if you need to reference anything. Bernard: Okay. Fitzgerald: Just FYI if you want to -- if you want us to go through anything that's there for us to look at if you need it. Bernard: All right. Certainly. So, I can drive or should I direct -- Johnson: Like we discussed, tell me what slide and when you need to be there. Bernard: Okay. When we get to that -- I just have a couple more points and, then, we have roll through when -- if I have enough time. Also we think the company should be on record with the city for transparency. That's pretty important right now. We have an LLC. We don't know who the builder is with the type of product for the housing. We don't know if this is going to be rental, single family. We -- we have no idea who the builder is, who the company is represented. It's behind an LLC at this time. And also we have said time and time again for the closure of Dashwood to avoid the cut through and help us be permanent. The applicant said they weren't against the closure, yet without concrete and filed correspondence with the city agencies, you know, kind of have doubts about the fate of Dashwood. So, we were asking the Commission to recommend to Council, since they are the deciding body, to address the Dashwood situation and to have that be permanently closed. And has anyone -- I know Bill has talked to the Enzlers. He called me this evening. So, he might have an opinion about the single family homes to the west and their size and also I think he's concerned about access. How is he going to get home when all of this construction is going on. And also the UDC was referenced that all local streets and stub streets must connect and that's where you want to do it. There is many stubs through the City of Meridian that have been decommissioned and closed to through traffic. So, there is four examples. You should have seen them in the correspondence Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 29 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 27 of 54 before -- where these stubs are decommissioned. And also the city can initiate the vacation of -- of such, because it falls under land use and if you don't think it's a good fit for Meridian. So, it is in the power of City of Meridian to -- to initiate these processes. Okay. If you go to slide two, please. This is what we -- we got in January 2019 and here is what we got in 2020. As you can see there is little deviation. I asked for less lots to the north and there -- this is just basically let's just get this, stamp it, print it, call it done. I don't think there was a whole bunch of effort done on this. We did try the Dashwood thing. As you can see we didn't even get that. But I do admit that there is -- there is a reduction. Usable green space, that's much better. We still have a lot of lots and the transition to our R-4 neighborhood and I think they could do a little better on the lots up north. And, then, on number three, please. As you can see we are grossly overconnected for a neighborhood our size and as you can see from the city -- we have got nine connections. Six are built now. And, then, we have three very close north-south connections in the future. For some reason it seems like our whole neighborhood has been retrofitted to address a vehicle and traffic problem that we shouldn't be -- be the only ones to bear. As you can see most of the east-west and north-south is going to be routed through our neighborhood. Eagle Road ten years ago isn't anything like it-- like it is today and it seems like since we were the last neighborhood on the block we were the ones that were going to get retrofitted to handle all the traffic that's coming. Next slide, please. Thank you. As you can see, ACHD has been talked to. Della is possible with some re- jigs. I'm not an engineer. This is just a resident who -- who sees a problem how this -- this could be addressed. Jasmine to the south is very important for the Enzlers to get home. Also I know Sonya referenced a cross-access or some sort of street for the Stellar Development that will be coming. We have to be very careful with in-fill. We have to make sure it fits, that we don't overwhelm neighborhoods. That the flow is great. I -- personally I hate cross-access. I hate driving through parking lots in -- in front of people's homes or apartments to get somewhere else. I don't like cutting through the -- the Taco Bell parking lot, et cetera. So, I think if the cities and agencies could get together and try to make this work -- you are going to have a bigger population down here and we should probably do our best to make sure it's smooth. People are going to have to cut through in such. And number five, please. As you can see, the Bollinger parcel is full of RVs. Dashwood was never signed as a stub. We had all bought thinking that this was a cul- de-sac. As you can see we thought that perhaps this was in the future for gate access for the Bollinger parcel and for Nourse Lateral access in case they needed to -- to address anything on the Bollinger parcel. And, again, we had no idea that this was coming. We have been kind of blindsided a little bit without the stub being connected. Number six. As you can see Centrepoint was quite the surprise as well. This is deeded as a common lot on the final plat filed with Boise. You have to dig into Ada county to find the quitclaim deed, the warranty deed of Lot 7, which is for the Centrepoint Way collector to be found. So, everyone bought here thinking that this was a landscape strip. No one -- no one on Brooksburg had any idea that there was going to be a collector. In fact, we didn't know this until the applicant came forward. Number seven, please. As you can see, this is MSM, master street maps. It doesn't show the collector going up to Wainwright until the amendment in 2018. Now, if this was done in 2005 you would think that this would have been reflected upon the map much earlier. And also you can see on Blueprint Boise Centrepoint Way connects and lines up Bald Cypress. It doesn't go all the way up to Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 30 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 28 of 54 Wainwright. So, we are getting kind of hit with a double whammy and, you know, no one knew this. No one -- no one bought foolishly. So, that's what I wanted to say about that. Next slide, please. So, things we are seeking are the emergency only at Dashwood in perpetuity. This -- there is another ingress-egress that is possible for traffic flow as you can see from the ACHD correspondence with the commissioners. This would avoid a twin de facto collector, create a better flow through Delano, and there would be no cut- through for Delano if Dashwood was closed. We are seeking larger lots, single story to the north for better transition. Also two story transitional product on the Cook parcel. R- 15 fits the MUR comp plan designation and also all construction traffic to Jasmine only with no exceptions, except for the initial utility connections. We also believe funds should be provided by all development for the improvement of Eagle Road and Wainwright intersection. In the ITD report they were seeking the southbound approach to a light on Eagle to be reconfigured and lengthened at this point and also there should be transparency and a named parent company for the project and, furthermore, a good development and traffic plan. There are many ways to develop this in-fill. New in-fill development should not disrupt the homes and lives of 211 -- lives of families on 211 homes on 90 acres. And, lastly, there is just a few questions about the housing type. Is this rental, the builder, and the ITD requirement and we are hoping that there will be good conductivity to the south of us. That would be great for all the in-fill parcels and, again, about the cross-access, parking lots, if we even have an unofficial lane of some sort it doesn't need to be a dedicated street. That might be best for this -- this whole city block. If you have any questions I would be sure happy to answer them. Thank you. Fitzgerald: Thank you very much. Are there any questions? Okay. Thank you very much. Madam Clerk, who is next on our list? Weatherly: Mr. Chair, next is Laura T. Fitzgerald: And if you can unmute her. Laura, you are unmuted. You have the floor. Please give us your name and your address and you have three minutes, ma'am. Trairatnobhas: Yes. This is Laura Trairatnobhas. 4621 North Camas Creek Way in Meridian and I am a resident of the Alpine Pointe Subdivision. First of all, thank you very much for taking all the time and trouble to set us up so that we can do this remotely. As a person who is in her 60s I really appreciate not having to go out into a public meeting. So, thank you for doing that. I know it was not easy. I would just like to bring up two quick points. On the issue of connectivity, we hear that word bandied about a lot and used in very serious conversations. Connectivity is definitely important, but it's also a relative term. There is no specific definition of how much connectivity is not enough or how much is too little and I think it is possible for it to be too much connectivity. I would just like to suggest that perhaps Planning and Zoning and the City of Meridian or whoever at Ada county is actually involved in this, sit down, talk, and perhaps come up with some standards for what connectivity means. How much is enough, but how much is too much. And I truly believe that Alpine Pointe is already thoroughly connected without adding in the Dashwood connection and, of course, Centrepoint. Second point that I want to bring up -- if I understood correctly we were told tonight that the City of Meridian requires that Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 31 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 29 of 54 streets be extended, but the ACHD's approach is that we could have Dashwood used as a temporary emergency road only for ten years until Centrepoint opens up and the point was made that if there is a conflict between ACHD versus City of Meridian, then, it would be the more strict -- more restrictive approach applies and as I'm reading it the more restrictive approach is that of ACHD, which says to then go ahead and use bollards, as Hethe has suggested and as we talked about in our meetings with Hethe, that we could use bollards to keep Dashwood closed only for emergencies at least for ten years or until Centrepoint opens up all the way. Obviously, ideally Centrepoint would be closed forever from my point of view and the point of view of my neighbors, the 200 of us living in our subdivision. If we were to go ahead and get permission to close it temporarily, then, it would be possible for Hethe and his project to start work. We from Alpine Pointe would have time to petition ACHD to vacate Dashwood in perpetuity so that it could be permanently closed off. So, that's just an idea I had that I would like to put out there and I think that's all right now. Thank you very much for listening. I do appreciate it. Fitzgerald: Thank you, ma'am. We appreciate you being here or being a part of this evening. And, Madam Clerk, I will let you pick the next one -- or provide us the next name. Weatherly: Michael Bernard. Fitzgerald: And, Mr. Bernard, I think you are unmuted now, sir. So, you have three minutes. Please give us your name and your address for the record, please. M.Bernard: Yes, Mr. Chair and Commission. Can you all hear me? Fitzgerald: You are a little bit muffled and a little bit quiet. If you can speak up a little bit more. M.Bernard: Okay. How -- is this better? Fitzgerald: That's better. Thank you. M.Bernard: Okay. My name is Michael Bernard. I live at 4025 North Dashwood Place Meridian, Idaho. 83646. So, obviously, a homeowner on Dashwood, which is one of the more contentious elements at least from my personal perspective and that of many of my neighbors. So, I just want to amplify maybe some of the points that have been made earlier and make a couple of my own. First I want to amplify the fact that this Commission has recommended to Council and Council has in the past closed other stubs. In fact, Mr. Clark, representing a different development at the time, made the point before this Commission and the Council asking for that to be done on behalf of a different development, because they would become a pinwheel. So, basically, we are -- we are really saying the same thing. We are taking the same perspective as Mr. Clark has in the past for very very similar circumstances. In fact, I mean the city I think has the -- has the approval -- the ability to do that and regardless of what the county wants, but I will move on. If -- if anyone could recall or if it would be possible to pull up -- pull up the drawings Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 32 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 30 of 54 of the original proposal that was presented, you know, a year ago compared to what we have now and sort of compare them, I think you will realize that the reason why some of this reconfiguration was done from the old layout to the new layout -- part of that was based on the fact that we wanted Dashwood to be closed and the current applicant was proposing to close Dashwood and have it be an emergency only. Now, if you notice in the prior one they had sort of meandered the traffic around back and forth, that way anyone coming in through Dashwood or coming up through Centrepoint on the south we wouldn't have any racetrack sort of a layout; right? Now, you look at the new one on the right, the new one on the right -- if Dashwood is open completely to Centrepoint, you notice that's a racetrack right there. There is no sort of traffic mitigating features in play there. You can go as fast as you want up and down any of those streets, either east-west or north-south through Dashwood and the north-south connectors. So, really what I'm talking about here is not only from a concern of the current homeowners in my subdivision or specifically on my street, but we need to think about the people that are going to be buying and living in here as well; right? If Dashwood is open permanently and we build here, who really wants to live on that street? I mean most people are like me, I bought on a place that I thought was a cul-de-sac. It was never signed like the other streets in my neighborhood when I bought that said this street to be connected in the future. My street wasn't signed. I thought I was living on a turnaround that was just there for construction vehicles and garbage trucks. Now, I bought there because I like living on a cul-de-sac. Everyone says, oh, I like where I live. There is no traffic. You ever hear anyone say they like living on the street that has a lot of traffic? Well, now if we go to a later -- if we go down a couple of -- a couple of slides where you see how that connects to the property to the south, that--that abomination they call the Brickyards, well, imagine if you live on one of these streets in this new proposed subdivision and all the traffic that's going to come through -- through your neighborhood from all that property to the south and, then, through my street, how can we possibly allow that? It's -- it's poor planning. It's not considering the families and the kids that are going to be living in this proposal and it's certainly not considering my grandkids that come visit at my house or the other disabled folks that live across the street from me that are out checking their mail in their wheelchairs. It's -- we are creating a racetrack. I probably need to get off my soapbox on that. Fitzgerald: Yeah. I think you need to wrap your comments up, Mr. Bernard, but we appreciate it. M.Bernard: Okay. And that's all I have. I appreciate my times probably run out. Thanks. I appreciate it. Fitzgerald: Thank you so much. We appreciate you being here and being a part of tonight. Madam Clerk, who is next, ma'am? Weatherly: Mr. Chair, we have Sandi King. Fitzgerald: Thank you. And, Sandi, you are unmuted. If you would like to state your name and your address for the record. You have three minutes. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 33 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 31 of 54 King: Thank you. Can you hear me okay? Fitzgerald: Yes, ma'am, we can. Thank you. King: Okay. Thank you, Mr. Chair and the Planning and Zoning Commissioners. Appreciate the work to be able to have us all part of this meeting tonight. It's been a stressful time for pretty much everybody I think. My issues are I -- I was part of the meetings with Mr. Clark in December and January, as I used to be on the HOA board. We talked about a lot of things. He's correct in most of what he has said. I'm not really challenging that, but I do want to say we never deviated from saying Dashwood needed to be vacated or closed and only open to foot or bike traffic. We talked about Idaho cities and counties in our state as a whole as being livable and -- and a beautiful place to live and raise families. If you allow this to open up into our subdivision it will not be livable. I -- I would ask you to drive through the area and the apartments that Mr. Bernard just referred to, they might be called the Brickyards, but everyone refers to them as the Barracks, because they are so huge and so ugly and so many that all will funnel through our subdivision. There is no way around it. People leaving Sports -- Dick's Sporting Goods, Hobby Lobby, all of that shopping center and food eatery won't want to go to Eagle, because Eagle is so crazy busy, so they will be funneling through our subdivision. There is no other option. Also when -- if you could pull up Malissa's slide number three. We not only have nine points of ingress and egress as it stands now, if you permanently vacate Dashwood we will still have eight points. I think that is still over connectivity. So, we are not asking for the moon, we are just asking you to make this a little more livable. My other point is Rogue River comes down and is one of those points of egress and I believe it is -- where number seven is. It's the blue line going up. Rogue River is a T street, goes down very close to the Brickyards. It is part of the -- I don't know what the city refers to it as, but it is the walk-bike path that is approximately ten feet wide. It comes up from the south, meanders through Alpine Pointe and continues on. That's connectivity. That is massive walk-bike path connectivity. It goes through our park area, goes through our subdivision in front of our homes. I think you are asking more than one subdivision should have to give. I'm asking you all to, please, consider what you are doing to the homeowners that purchased thinking we had a nice subdivision, streets wide enough to back RVs, because most of us have RV garages to be able to pull up, back them into your garage and maintain a comfortable subdivision, comfortable living, safe place for our children and our grandchildren to play. You have the ability to recommend vacating Dashwood. I would strongly ask that you do that and I think that is the bulk of what I would like to say tonight and I appreciate your consideration. I appreciate your time. One last point. I would also like to state that our homes we purchased not being aware of this, because it wasn't public information. The other point is Delano Subdivision is being built for profit. It is not an individual homeowner that we are requesting a limitation of. He can sell his property, but the development is for profit and I think that is the consideration that should be also considered. Thank you. Fitzgerald: Thank you, Mrs. King. We appreciate it. Madam Clerk, who is next? Weatherly: Mr. Chair, lastly we have Kenneth Clifford. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 34 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 32 of 54 Fitzgerald: Thank you. Mr. Clifford, we are working on getting you unmuted, sir. Hold on one second. Johnson: Mr. Chair, it looks he will have to unmute himself. Fitzgerald: Mr. Clifford, can you unmute yourself and, then, we can hear you, sir. If you are on the phone you hit star six. If you can unmute yourself on the bottom left of your screen. I think the host can unmute them, but I cannot. Johnson: We cannot either. It's not allowing us. When we hit the unmute button it's -- Fitzgerald: Mr. Clifford, I think you are unmuted, sir. If you want to state your name and your address for the record. I think we -- you have got three minutes. Clifford: Hi. Can you hear me now? Fitzgerald: Yes, sir. Thank you. Clifford: Okay. Yeah. That was quite the deal. My name is Kenneth Clifford. I'm at 4523 North Rosepoint Place in Meridian. I'm also in the Alpine Pointe Subdivision. I submitted my testimony in writing earlier today. It should it be in your packet. Everything else that I would want to talk about they have -- people before me have already done so eloquently, that I would be in repetition. What I would like to point out, though, that hasn't been talked about is the overcapacity of the schools. In going back through the packet I see that the West Ada School District submitted their reply in April -- on April 16th, 2019, and in that letter they recommended that the city deny the applicant -- or application for Delano Subdivision and they did so because their schools that are impacted by the Delano Subdivision are already over capacity. I should say two of the three schools that are impacted are over and I have the information in my -- in my submission, but the Discovery Elementary is the only one that is not over capacity. The Heritage Middle School was 254 students or 125 percent and the Rocky Mountain High School has an enrollment of 2,448, with a capacity of 1,800. So, it's 136 percent of capacity or 648. That information is a year old. That letter was dated on April 16th, 2019, and here we are actually exactly one year later and I don't know what -- if anybody has taken into consideration the additional growth that we have had in Meridian and impacts to those schools or if that's just a moot point. Other than that I think that my other cohorts have covered the material very eloquently and I agree with Sandi and all those that we are over connected and we are going to maintain the connectivity when we open up the Rogue River Way and also when Centrepoint comes in that will put two connections north-south and Dashwood would just simply be overkill and I thank you very much for your time. Fitzgerald: Thank you, sir. Thank you. Is there any additional people on the phone or -- that would like to testify that we haven't heard from yet? Madam Clerk, do you -- are you aware of anybody else? I don't see any hands either. Weatherly: Mr. Chair, I don't see any hands raised either. If I -- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 35 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 33 of 54 Fitzgerald: I do see one. Can we unmute Allie Crane? Allie, you are unmuted. Please state your name and your address for the record and we are happy to hear from you. Crane: Thank you, sir. My name is Allie Crane. My address is 2654 East Mahoney Street. I'm actually in Champion Park Subdivision. Thank you for allowing me to speak. I -- with everything going on I had -- I had planned this meeting and, then, I did not think about it until right when it started. So, I filled out the form, but it was late. So, I'm on the south end of the proposed subdivision of Delano and I actually am at the north end of Champion Park. We are on Mahoney, where kind of Petty and Leslie Way meet on a very short stub street Mahoney Street. So, it's -- it's very short. If you could -- if you could compare the original and the new plan comparison, that slide is what I really wanted to address. Obviously, most of the concerns have been about the Dashwood Drive and ours is -- is more of a -- a tree issue and I know -- I spoke at the last City Council meeting when -- when this proposal was -- was available. If you can see in the original plan -- the original plan there were trees all along that southern boundary of the Delano Subdivision and those are all mature, about 30 feet trees, and I couldn't even tell you how many there are. There is probably about 30, 40 trees that line at the angle and, then, also on the Centrepoint. And so our home, along with about four of my neighbors, we sit kind of on that slant and where it turns to the street and so those trees were pretty important to us for this subdivision, because, one, they are mature trees and I -- I'm not sure how the city feels about taking out very mature trees that are healthy. Understand when they get diseased it's, obviously, important to take them out, but healthy trees are nice to have and you can see that that original plan had a lot of green space -- mostly trees on the bottom, which was probably nice for them also, because as you move farther east, then, you get into the Brick -- Brickyard to try to avoid the -- the views of the Brickyard. And, then, if you look at the new plan and -- and this is where I -- my -- my major concern is with this is -- is that there is no trees. They have taken out pretty much all of those 40'ish trees to the south of their development. So, that's -- it's a concern. I would like to see -- to see a way to incorporate those trees back into the plan. I don't -- I was trying to look through the materials to see what those lot spaces are -- or lot sizes on that bottom, what they look like and if those are single level homes or double -- or two story homes, but I was having a hard time going through the materials quickly. So, I think that's my primary concern that I just wanted to relay, that we are taking out a huge number of very nice mature pine trees. Evergreens. And that's all. Thank you. Fitzgerald: Thank you, Mrs. Crane. We appreciate your input. That was a perspective we hadn't heard, so I appreciate that. Any additional hands raised? Any additional participants that haven't -- we haven't heard from? Not seeing any -- give everybody a second here. Allen: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Yes, ma'am. Allen: When the public testimony is concluded I do have an item I would like to discuss -- with the Commission. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 36 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 34 of 54 Fitzgerald: Perfect. Well, I don't see any additional hands being raised on Zoom. Madam Clerk, one more ask of you. Is there anybody else that you are aware of that needs to -- or was wanting to testify? Weatherly: Mr. Chair, I am not aware of anybody else. Fitzgerald: Okay. Thank you very much, ma'am. Sonya, do you want to go right ahead and, then, we have provide it to Hethe to close. Allen: Yes. Thank you. In response to Mrs. Allie Crane's testimony on the existing trees that are along the southern boundary of the site, staff did discuss this issue with the applicant with the previous development plan and the applicant relayed to staff that those trees were planned to be removed by the existing residential property owner for firewood. Staff did include a condition of approval in the staff report to include mitigation information on the plan for any existing trees that are not removed from the property. You know, if -- I would recommend if these trees are still existing today, if -- if Commission and the Council has a desire for those to remain -- they are not going to be able to remain with the current lot configuration, but be mitigated for as they exist today, I would suggest recommending that in the conditions of approval specifically. Thank you. Fitzgerald: Thanks, Sonya. Any additional questions for the staff before we turn it over to the applicant for closure? Okay. Hearing none, Hethe, would you like to take us to close, please, sir. Clark: Sure. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Again, for the record Hethe Clark. 251 Front Street in Boise. A couple items that I will just kind of hit in rapid fire fashion and, then, if there are additional questions I'm happy to try to address them. With regard to the lots on the north. Let's see. Can I have the PowerPoint back? Thank you. So, with regard to the lots on the north, as Mrs. Bernard stated, what -- and you can see it right here. It's not very easy to see, but we have written in 6,000 square feet. That was what we were shooting for. Our average is 5,661 feet. We have got a couple of those -- of the lots in the new plan that are actually over 6,000. We feel like we have done what we can to compromise there. And, again, we are transitioning -- we are going a long ways with that transition. With regard to the question of two story limitation on the R-40 section, I would just say that that's not appropriate at this time. There is a conditional use permit application that will be required before multi-family can go on that parcel. At that time any of those types of limitations would be fair game to discuss, but it's -- it's premature to discuss that at this point. With regard to schools, the -- the -- Owhyee -- the West Ada letter -- the specific language there was that it is West Ada School District's opinion it would be best to delay the approval of the Delano Subdivision until fall 2020, within a year of the opening of Owyhee High School. Congratulations, everybody, we made it. As long as this has gone on, this -- that's -- that's not an issue. With regard to Dashwood, you know, a couple points and -- and I feel like I'm in a bit of a pinch here. You know, from one perspective, you know, these roads are all well within capacity at build out, but I want to be clear that I haven't been advocating for an open Dashwood. You know, we asked for emergency only. We were able to get temporary emergency only. This is not the Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 37 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 35 of 54 same as Three Corners where the property in question was in a complete pinwheel, but ultimately I'm asking for the same thing. You know, I'm asking to limit connectivity by doing at least a temporary emergency only and -- and Laura, you know, her comments are spot on. You know, it's exactly what I have tried to suggest, which is including at the neighborhood meeting in February, which is, you know, that's -- if folks really want, you know, closure on this, the -- the best way to get there is to make an application vacate and the Idaho Code for that is 40-203. There is a process and it involves in most instances the homeowners who live on each side of the -- of the property to be vacated. Until that right of way at Dashwood on the north side is vacated I do think it's going to be a tough row to hoe to get that to be anything but a temporary emergency access. But, again, that's -- that's what we have asked for. We have asked for it to be an emergency access and, you know, we hope will be, you know, at some point given some credit for that by the neighbors. I think with that I think those are the -- the issues that I wanted to follow up on. Happy to answer any follow-up questions that the Commissioners might have. Fitzgerald: Thanks, Hethe. Commissioners, do you have questions for the applicant? Pitzer: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Pitzer. Pitzer: Thank you. Mr. Hethe, in looking over the -- the many, many, many letters and the other testimonies, alternative plats or -- or -- or designs have been submitted. Have you taken a look at those and make any considerations for alternate designs, especially some that would offer some calming -- traffic calming, other than this direct route that -- that is shown here? Clark: Mr. Chair, Commissioner Pitzer, I became aware of those as alternatives probably six weeks ago. Had a number of conversations with Malissa and the board via e-mail about those. I provided comments, my -- my impressions of them. This was, you know, after we had had our two meetings and after the neighborhood meeting, but I did try to take all of that into account. It appears to me that most of those are dependent on Della punching -- so, the -- the north -- the east-west road on the north, those plans are largely dependent on that punching through all the way to Centrepoint. That is something that is based on the currently approved road configuration that ACHD has approved here. The -- Della cannot punch through. If-- and that's because of the -- the layout and the safety issues with regard to the way that the intersections were arrived. Now, if you were to modify that and push Centrepoint over I think you raised a whole list of other questions. Now, again, this is the road configuration that -- that ACHD has approved. I think if you move off of that what you end up doing is you push the Centrepoint off to the east, you end up bisecting your mixed use regional properties, which are -- are pretty narrow in the first place. If you do that what you are going to end up with is you are going to have Jasmine having the same issues that Della would otherwise have and you are creating an issue for our neighbors to the west. So, as I look at it I see this as -- yeah. Again this is the road configuration that ACHD has approved, but I think if you go these other routes that you actually start creating more problems than you solve. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 38 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 36 of 54 Fitzgerald: Hethe, quick question. At the end of Dashwood right now -- Clark: Yep. Fitzgerald: -- does it currently have a sign that says stub street will be extended in the future? Clark: I'm not -- Mr. Chair, I'm not aware that they do. But I would -- I would show one thing. Can I have the backup slide list. Fitzgerald: And maybe, Sonya, can you look -- is there any signage out there currently on extension -- Allen: Extension of Dashwood, Chairman? Fitzgerald: Yes. Yes, ma'am. Allen: I am not sure. Clark: So, Mr. Chair, this is what you see out there. You have two cul-de-sacs on either side of Dashwood and, then, you have Dashwood that continues down and, then, has an extension on the cul-de-sac into the property boundary. I'm not aware of how it's been signed in the past. Again, I'm -- I am not the person here asking for Dashwood to be fully opened right now. So, just keep that in mind. But it does look -- it does look different than the other cul-de-sacs on either side. Again, we want it to be a temporary emergency. We want people to be able to ride their bikes and walk from Alpine Pointe down to the shopping areas. You know, we think that's appropriate and that's what we have asked for. But it does look significantly different than the two cul-de-sacs immediately on either side of it. Pitzer: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Pitzer. Pitzer: I can -- I can speak to that sign. I walk that area and since I have been here since 2015 there has never been a sign on that corner. Fitzgerald: Thank you for the information. Seal: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Seal. Seal: Just a quick-- I mean even --even with the emergency-- making that an emergency connection with only the one ingress-egress, doesn't that limit them to what they can do Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 39 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 37 of 54 as far as how many lots they can have available? I think it limits them to 30 lots or something like that. Clark: Mr. Chair, Commissioner Seal, with the emergency that satisfies the 30 lot limitation. It's only if you have a single ingress-egress that you are limited to 30. Seal: Okay. So, essentially, it's just the -- it's a fire department emergency access requirement not -- Clark: That's correct. Yes. Seal: Okay. McCarvel: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner McCarvel. McCarvel: Looking at this -- to the Rogue River from the west is going to eventually connect up there with Jasmine. Clark: Commissioner McCarvel, are you asking me if they will connect? McCarvel: Yeah. Either you or Sonya. Clark: That -- that's my understanding. Sonya might have more insight. Allen: Chairman, Commissioner McCarvel, I'm sorry, could you repeat the question? McCarvel: The Rogue River to the west is going to connect with Jasmine as well with future development or is that not in the plan? Allen: With the future development of the property directly to the east? McCarvel: West. Allen: Yes, that would be required to be extended when that property redevelops, just -- just like Dashwood. Unless otherwise approved by Council. There is a clause in city code that if access via local street is available and that's --that's what applies in this case, that access should be taken from the local street and that's like rather than an arterial and collector street. And in the case of Rogue River that would be -- that would be the only access if -- if this property develops there would also be a local street access stub from this property that would be extended. McCarvel: Right. Okay. Fitzgerald: Do you have follow-up, Commissioner McCarvel? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 40 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 38 of 54 McCarvel: No. I just wanted to make sure I was understanding it, because I thought I heard somebody mentioned before Rogue River will come in from the west to Jasmine, as well as Centrepoint is going to be connected on the east side of Jasmine. Fitzgerald: Additional questions for the applicant or staff? Cassinelli: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Cassinelli. Cassinelli: Sonya, are you aware of where Centrepoint is designed to -- to punch out to Wainwright in the future, was that always -- right now it's just I guess a common lot for better description there between the -- the commercial and the residential. Was -- what was that -- what was that strip of land? Was that --was that an easement for a connector through there or a collector through it, excuse me, or was that a common lot part of one of the other developments? Allen: Chairman, Commissioner Cassinelli, Commissioners, I believe it's unopened right of way. I do not know when it originated though. Clark: Commissioner Cassinelli, I would just add to that. It's my understanding that that is ACHD right of way and that there is a road trust in place to pay for the construction of that that the -- the original developer put up. That's my understanding. Cassinelli: So, there was a -- there was a purpose there for that to be a road coming down through there at some point in the future? Allen: Chairman, Commissioner Cassinelli, yes, that is where the master street map depicts a collector street connection to Wainwright. Cassinelli: Okay. Fitzgerald: And so they have to vacate the commercial entrance to that office complex or whatever the -- for -- odd thing is to the west? Would that be two curb cuts like right next to each other? Allen: Chairman Fitzgerald, I would assume. So I don't know ACHD's plans long term. Pitzer: Mr. Chair? Again, I walk this area. That is what our neighborhood considers the grassy knoll. It's -- it's completely grassed in at the very end of the street at Wainwright. There are utility boxes and it's just grass all the way down. There is no signage on it to indicate that there would be a street or anything there. It's always been just a grassy area between the subdivisions. It looks like a buffer zone between the subdivision and the commercial. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 41 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 39 of 54 Fitzgerald: Thank you for that. Hethe, do you have any additional comments before we close, sir? Clark: No, Mr. Chair. Thanks, everyone. And this went -- I felt like the process is -- is pretty smooth. So, appreciate everybody's participation on this. Fitzgerald: We appreciate you being here. Thank you. Any additional questions or comments for staff or for the applicant before we close the public hearing? Seal: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Seal. Seal: And this is more of a legal question, but as far as the marking of -- of Dashwood Place, I mean it's -- it's been reported over and over that that was not marked for extension. Is there some legality behind that as far as the posting of that, what needs to be there, what needs to be posted, how long it needs to be posted? Fitzgerald: Sonya or Bill, can you handle that or maybe Andrea or Ted? Allen: Chairman, I'm not aware of any requirement that ACHD post stub streets for future extension, but they do try to do that so that residents are aware that it is not a dead end street. Pogue: Mr. Chair, Ted Baird signed off after the first agenda item and I am in agreement with Sonya, I'm not aware of any requirement. Fitzgerald: Thank you very much, ma'am. Parsons: Yeah. Mr. Chair, Members of the Commission, it's -- more than likely it's a -- it's an ACHD requirement. That was probably -- typically what -- when we see that it's -- it's in an ACHD staff report for that subdivision and, yes, there is -- typically there is a condition that's says that needs to be signed notice that this will be extended in the future. Why that didn't occur we don't know. We will have to go back through the public record and look at that. Seal: But that's not a legal requirement I guess is more my question. Parsons: It's not a city. It's an ACHD requirement and they are the ones that require that to be signed. That's why when you look on Google Earth you will see the barricades up there, but when I look at Google Earth and drop the guy down on the street there, there is somebody with an RV and a truck blocking in the barricade, so I can't tell what's actually there to verify whether or not there is a sign. They are usually pretty small, like a no parking sign on a cul-de-sac. So, they are not a great big sign that stands out to people, though. I can be honest -- to be honest with you. They are pretty small. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 42 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 40 of 54 Fitzgerald: So, you have got -- that's where I was going, Bill. That was exactly what I thought. So, I was wanting to ask the question. So, appreciate it. Parsons: Yeah. I can -- I can look at the conditions of approval really quick and see what was approved back with the preliminary plat. Johnson: Mr. Chair, this is Chris. You have had some folks who have provided testimony already raising their hands at this point and throughout the last few moments. I -- I believe you have closed that, but I wanted to let you know there -- there are questions I believe coming from them. Fitzgerald: Thanks, Chris. They are asking to testify or they are asking to ask questions? Johnson: I can only see a raised hand. So, if you would like to allow them to let you know what they want you can do that, but you can close it up and have Mr. Clark -- Fitzgerald: Commissioners, I -- we have allowed public testimony and we have folks who want a second chance. We usually do not do that when we go to close, but is there questions out there for the HOA? Anybody have a problem with me allowing Mrs. Bernard to talk for a second and we will allow Hethe to close? Seal: I think that's appropriate with everything that's been presented. Pitzer: I concur. Fitzgerald: Chris, will you unmute Mrs. Bernard. And, Malissa, can you hear us? Bernard: I'm showing -- oh, hello. I'm showing up right now. I just want to say that Dashwood Place has never been signed. It's all in the public testimony. This has been submitted through pictures of how this has always looked. It's never been signed. We have got people who have lived here since 2010 who said it's never been signed and also by definition place also means a closed cul-de-sac or a dead end. Now, when people are buying properties, if it says court or place, that infers that it's a dead end. So, by the misnomer of Dashwood Place and its creation in 2005 for a landlocked parcel that does not exist now, that kind of nullifies the need for this stub. So, that's what we are pushing for. It is within Planning and Zoning to recommend it to be closed and it's also within the City Council's power to do so. So, number one, we didn't have a sign. Number two, you have got this -- it's named as a place, which by definition means a very limited street to traffic. Thank you. Fitzgerald: Thank you for that. So, any comments there? I think the -- the challenge I have -- and I will turn to my planning team, because they know this better, but when you have a Snoopy or a big wide open cul-de-sac like this that's flat on one end, usually it's going to be extended. That's just -- and I will let Hethe close with comments around that. Naming principles are not always -- that's -- we submit that to the mail -- to the post office for approval, not to Planning and Zoning always. So, there are some -- there are Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 43 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 41 of 54 challenges always. They are -- not always the places and courts that always match up perfectly. So, I will let Hethe respond there and, then, let the Planning and Zoning staff respond as well. Clark: Sure. Thank --thank you, Mr. Chair. The -- I don't know that I would add anything more to that. Again, I am in a bit of a pinch point here with the position that I'm actually advocating, but that is -- in order for that to be public right of way would have been dedicated on the plat is the only thing I would add to what Mr. Chair said and I would leave it at that. Fitzgerald: Sonya or Bill, do you have anything else to add on that piece? Allen: Yes. Chairman. Commissioners. When a -- when a right of way is stubbed to a property line such as this, the road is meant to be extended, as opposed to just a cul-de- sac that does not have right of way extended to the property line. This did have a cul-de- sac for emergency vehicle turnaround is the reason the cul-de-sac is there, but it also has right of way stubbed to the property line, which indicates that it was intended to be extended in the future. Again, I can't remember if I mentioned this earlier, if I -- or if I got sidetracked on another thought, but code does require the street to be extended, but it also has a provision for a Council waiver of that provision. So, anyway, just be aware of that, if it is your desire to make any recommendations to Council on the extension of Dashwood. Thank you. Fitzgerald: Thanks, Sonya. Any additional comments before we close the public hearing? Cassinelli: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Cassinelli. Cassinelli: Sonya, can you -- can you just elaborate on that last point you made. Can -- does Council have the -- the authority to -- to -- to make that a permanent closure or that -- that would have to definitely go through ACHD? Allen: The City Council does have authority to act on it through our city code. ACHD also has authority over it. So, as I mentioned earlier, both -- both entities would need to agree to that in order for it not to be extended. Cassinelli: Thank you. Allen: Otherwise, if one entity required it to extend -- you know, that's -- that's what they would be required to do with this development. Fitzgerald: Thanks, ma'am. Bill, did you have any other follow up there? Cassinelli: No. I'm good. Thank you. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 44 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 42 of 54 Fitzgerald: If there is no other comments or questions, can I get a motion to close the public hearing? Cassinelli: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Cassinelli. Cassinelli: I move to closed the public hearing for Delano Subdivision, H-2019-002 -- am I on the right one? I'm not. Yeah. H-2019-0027. Seal: Second. McCarvel: Second. Fitzgerald: I have a motion and a second to close public hearing on H-2019-0027. All those in favor say aye. Any opposed? Motion passes. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Fitzgerald: Okay. Friends and neighbors, this -- this application is properly before you. Do you have any kick-off thoughts? There is a lot to take in. Seal: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Seal. Seal: Just looking at it, I mean I would commend the applicant on, you know, changing the configuration, you know, I mean trying -- trying to fit this thing in here and satisfy everybody is -- has got to be a daunting task for sure. I like what they have done on the -- on the north and the west boundaries. I'm -- I'm a fan of leaving the west boundary as a single story. I just think that's going to help everybody in the future as far as what the transition needs to look like and the lot that may or may not develop to the west, as well as to the people that currently inhabit it. Looking at the -- the way it's laid out as far as the race track element to it, I mean before where it was kind of a loop that went in there and the way that it lined up I could see what -- what happened there, but the offset on it and the way that that goes up into the Delano, I mean in -- in and of itself that's a bit of a -- a traffic mitigation. I live on the corner of a through street and having the other streets come into it at an angle is something that slows everybody down. Obviously, not everybody, but, you know, most everybody that intends on obeying the law. You know, looking at -- at the Alpine Pointe as far as it being over connected. I mean if we are just looking at Alpine -- Alpine Pointe, I agree with that statement, but we are looking at this subdivision and this subdivision is going to be -- if we limit it to one ingress-egress and, then, an emergency, to me that's under connected. I mean that -- that's very limiting to the people that live in there as far as the function of being able to get in and out. You know, being able to have some of them go north, have some of them go south is -- I mean it's -- it's healthy as far as that says -- as the subdivision that we are looking at -- the Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 45 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 43 of 54 development that we are looking at going in. So, as much as I -- you know, I would personally hate to live on something that is a cul-de-sac and, then, have it opened up. That said, even looking at the -- I looked at the same Google Earth street view and you can plainly see that the pavement goes all the way up to the fence, which is not normal. Generally that would be a sidewalk and there is a big red sign there indicating that that's a blocked road, even though -- even though there is a fence that separates the two pieces of property. So, should there have been a sign up that said, you know, this street to be continued in the future, more than likely and, hopefully, there is not a legal recourse for that. That's -- that's one of my concerns about moving forward with this. But that will probably play out at a different time. I did like the feedback from the individual that talked about the trees on the southwestern exposure there. I mean if they are good, healthy trees it would be a good idea to try and keep them in there. I'm sure they appreciate them for privacy and everything else on that side. Other than that, I mean we kind of got to work with what we have here. We -- we don't really know when these other streets are going to go in and how they are going to go in. As far as connecting into the -- you know, the existing cul-de-sac there, it's -- even from the ACHD point of view, it's -- it -- it's -- it's going to happen. That street is going to become a through -- you know, that street will connect through and, again, it's not so that Alpine -- Alpine Pointe can have more connectivity, it's so that this subdivision -- this development has enough connectivity and I think that ACHD or, you know, the city otherwise would be hard pressed to not recognize that. So, you know, again, I like what's been done here. I know that it's probably been pretty hard to put it in. I mean the point on the schools -- I mean, you know me, I'm always willing to step up for the schools, but I know that there is another high school that's going to open up. It's scheduled to open up. Rocky Mountain High School numbers are going to come down. They have some provisions in place to open up another middle school. So, I mean all of that is within spec. You know, they are -- they have come a long way with everything and I -- you know, I think that they have done as much as they possibly can in order to get this thing to go in. Holland: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Holland. Holland: I think Commissioner Seal had a lot of my similar comments. I think the applicant's come a long way since the last time we saw this project. It looks like they have worked through a lot of the issues that we had with them previously and I like the -- the way that they have allocated the park space. I think that looks like a nice amenity for this loop and I certainly feel for the neighbors that are up on the north side, but they had a number of stub streets that were planned into their community and I understand also where the city's coming from and wanting to enforce those stub streets, because even though it sounds counterintuitive, the more access points you have in a neighborhood the less of an impact you actually feel from those access points, because they are more connected. So, there is kind of a Catch 22 on how many you really should have and I certainly feel for them. I -- you know, I -- if I lived off Dashwood Place I would certainly be concerned as well about turning that in, but I think they have done what they can to try and mitigate some of the concerns of how traffic will route through there in the way that Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 46 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 44 of 54 they have designed the neighborhood to come through there. Hopefully they won't see a lot of cut-through traffic and once Centrepoint Way is constructed I think it will be better. Again, it's unfortunate that we have got two points of connection that close together and maybe once Centrepoint is -- is open, then, Dashwood could become an emergency type access only. I would be more comfortable if Centrepoint went through currently, but without it going through it's tough. I see why -- why staff and ACHD want to have that connection point. To the couple of items that they asked for amendments on, Item 1-D of restricting the home -- or not restricting the homes on the west side, I would agree. I think single family is probably a safer bet, just to, you know, protect what's going to happen in the future, but I would be okay with them doing single story with a bonus room, because those are facing forward. So, maybe that's a concession we can make that gives them a little bit more room for square footage if they are looking to add a bonus room. They are usually front facing. They don't tend to impact behind neighbors. But maybe that's an option we could throw forward for them. And, then, for Item 2-B, they wanted to remove -- I don't see a big concern with them waiting to do the buffer and sidewalk on the east side of Centrepoint until the third phase, because that's when they will start really looking into it. I would hate to see them have to build something that has to get ripped out later, so I don't see a concern with either one of the requests that were out there. Yeah. I don't know. It's -- it's definitely a tough project and one that we gave a lot of thought to last time it came through to us. It's hard for some of these in-fill projects and it's hard to do them exactly the way that, you know, you envision them, but I think they have done a thoughtful job of trying to hear all the concerns and trying to come up with the best plat that they can come up with. That's my thoughts for now. Fitzgerald: Additional comments? I -- in the midstream I think we are going to start seeing these more often -- as an in-fill discussion, especially with the new comp plan. It's prepping for that. So, I think this is going to be more normal than not and I think we are going to have to be creative, because it's hard to do in-fill, so -- McCarvel: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Oh. Commissioner McCarvel. Commissioner Grove, you can hop in next, sir. McCarvel: Okay. Yeah. I like the -- what they have done. It's night and day from what was presented last year and I think that transition on the north -- you have really only got -- with the exception of that one pie shaped lot, you really only -- you have got a two to one transition pretty much there. So, I think those lots are fine and I do I like the comments with the trees. If those are salvageable that would be nice. Yeah. And, unfortunately, I -- I feel for the homeowners on Dashwood, but that is a different shaped cul-de-sac. I would -- if I was living there I think I would have assumed that was going through. That being said, you know, at some point -- you know. And maybe it's a year down the road, maybe it's ten years down the road, but if Centrepoint and Rogue River are connected, I think they could petition at that point to have it vacated and just see how things are going. But I agree, I mean we have got -- it's the connectivity of this subdivision that's lacking at this time. So, I guess that's where I'm at on those. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 47 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 45 of 54 Fitzgerald: Commissioner Grove. Sorry, sir. Grove: So, this is my first time seeing this, obviously, and I'm not as familiar as everybody else is with this project, so kind of coming at it with some fresh eyes. You know, I -- looking back at what they proposed last time versus what they are proposing now, I see that they have made some, you know, major adjustments. And I don't have it pulled up right in front of me, but it was like 20 houses fewer and, then, before, which in a development the size of -- pretty large number to dwindle down. So, I applaud them on -- on working to address the neighborhood concerns. I like what they have done. I would echo what AIIi and Sonya said about seeing if there is a way to keep those existing trees. I don't know exactly what that would look like or mean, but having mature trees definitely would enhance this project quite a bit. But other than that, you know, I don't want to reiterate everything that has been said before, but I agree with the statements of the previous Commissioners, so -- Fitzgerald: Thanks, sir. Commissioner Cassinelli, were you getting ready to -- Cassinelli: Mr. Chair. I think so. Has everybody -- I'm not stepping on somebody's time here. Fitzgerald: Go right ahead, sir. Cassinelli: I applaud the applicant's efforts to better transition the lots on the north. They did take them down. I know the folks there along -- in Alpine Pointe would like to see even larger lots, but I think they have done a good job there. My biggest issue -- and, really, the only way that -- that I think I would support this is to go along with the app -- and it was the applicant that actually petitioned ACHD to close off Dashwood. I -- this is a -- this isn't a huge area here with 60 something. You know, once Centrepoint comes out there will be good north -- north-south flow. I -- I would like to see him stick with the ACHD acceptance of keeping Dashwood closed for ten years and that would, I think give the opportunity to Alpine Pointe residents to petition ACHD. I think eventually when -- when Centrepoint punches up to Wainwright this area is going to -- it's going to have flow. They can get out-- eventually Jasmine to Rogue River I think was the name of that street. You know, as far as the pinwheel and this one it's -- it's small enough I don't think that -- that that's an issue, but I'm -- and a couple other points where the -- I like what Commissioner Holland suggested on -- on the lots to the R-8 on the -- on the west side, perhaps allowing -- keep the single story, allow I guess a -- a bonus up would -- I would be in favor of that. But, again, I would want to see the -- I would want to see them following the -- the ACHD recommendation on Dashwood to -- to close that as emergency exit and pedestrian for ten years or until Centrepoint is completed. I mean that's -- I feel strong about that. I think it's a -- it would be a lot of traffic goes -- that people in Brickyard would be funneling out that and I -- I think that -- that would be an intense burden on that street when that -- when that happens. I think -- I think the Brickyard and everything else -- Hobby Lobby, all those need to be forced onto Centrepoint and -- unless that's -- that's maintained as an emergency exit -- access I don't see that happening. So, other than that I would -- I do like what they have done. They have -- there has been a lot of Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 48 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 46 of 54 concessions, but I would want to see Dashwood remain closed to emergency and pedestrian at this time. And that's all I have to say. Fitzgerald: Thanks, sir. Commissioner Pitzer. Pitzer: Yes. Thank you, Mr. Chair. I'm going to -- I'm going to say I do like that the density has been lower. The larger lots along the north -- northern boundary I think could be bigger, but they are what they are. I know 6,050 -- six hundred is not making a big difference. They did lose I believe three lots is what they lost along that -- or that they changed along the northern boundary. I am deeply concerned about the race track. I know that you took the path of least resistance, anything to stay off of Eagle Road and where most of this traffic is coming down Centrepoint, I believe Centrepoint, from what I read, was supposed to be a mirror of Records. Records only goes down behind the commercial, as is Centrepoint. It does not go against any forward facing homes when it gets to the subdivision, because it turns and I think that is what is -- is missing here. By allowing Dashwood to go through we are allowing the through traffic to go all the way from Ustick all the way down to McMillan and -- and, like I said, it will take no time at all for people to figure that out and -- and make that a thoroughfare without any calming. If the roads were to go through the subdivision in a different fashion, then, I could see where you would have some calming. There is no calming with this as it is. I also think that there could be a stub street. I think that there -- the design -- I'm all for in-fill, so I know something has to go back in there. Something will go back in there, I'm just -- I think this configuration is the wrong configuration for this at this time. The ACHD records that I looked at said that they can put a stub street when the stub -- when the Wong property eventually sells to go all the way through to Centrepoint. I think it's -- I think this is premature. I think that there -- we have one chance at this to get it right and I commend Boll Cook for coming together with the HOA and -- and trying to make this work, but I just see too many flaws for me to support it with the plat that's presented. Fitzgerald: Additional comments? Holland: Mr. Chair, it looks like Sonya might be trying to speak. Fitzgerald: Sonya, were you hopping in there? Allen: Mr. Chair, Sonya is not trying to speak. Thank you for the -- thank you for the eye out though, Commissioner Holland. Holland: It said on the top of my screen Sonya speaking, so -- Allen: I don't know why. Thank you. Fitzgerald: To be -- I think the applicant has done a good job of balancing what everybody is trying to do. I do see where -- Commissioner Cassinelli's point in some of the comments have been made where the thoroughfare back there can be mitigated with other streets later on and so I -- I'm amenable if we want to make an emergency access. I think there Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 49 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 47 of 54 -- there is a boat load of residences in the Brickyard that will find other ways to get out and I know that will happen. So, I don't want to significantly impact the folks on whatever that can run a street in -- the -- excuse me. I got too many things in my head. But I -- I do think there has got to be a way to vacate that at some point or when it's necessary. So, just my thoughts. I'm good with Commissioner Holland's comments in regards to bonus rooms, if that's something that we want to do as a -- as a kind of happy medium. But that's -- there is a lot of things to take into this and a lot of-- a lot of feelings that have gone around it in regards to the last year we have been doing this conversation. So, think -- but I do think it's a balance between the media density that's there and the buffer that is the Brickyard right now. I think there is -- trying to find something that balances and that slowly kind of brings a transition. You are not going to find very much more balance there. So, it's challenging. McCarvel: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner McCarvel. McCarvel: Yeah. I think I would be supportive of this being emergency only for the ten years. That would give this time to play out just a little bit more and that the residents could petition to vacate as other stuff opens up around there. Holland: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Holland. Holland: I think I can be open to seeing it be an emergency and pedestrian access, too. I don't know if ACHD and staff would accept that and maybe we just make that recommendation to Council, let them deliberate, but I certainly see the concerns and as long as there is enough access and they feel confident people can get in and out of there -- as long as there is still at least an emergency access point where maybe bollards or something like that where if there is something -- a fire or whatever in the neighborhood, people can get out if needed. I would feel more comfortable with that, too. Fitzgerald: I think that gives -- I still think they would like to have access to that commercial space and by giving them emergency and pedestrian opportunity to get through there, that won't add additional traffic, but it will give them connectivity through walking and biking. So, I think it's a balance. Grove: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Yes, sir. Commissioner Grove. Grove: Just on that point, one of the pieces in the staff report was regarding the pathway and how it would follow Centrepoint I believe. But without it going all the way through there is a lack of pedestrian walkway through this development, so by making that an Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 50 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 48 of 54 emergency access pedestrian walkway that would help alleviate some of the -- that walking connectivity through this in-fill project. Fitzgerald: Additional comments? Parsons: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Yes, sir. Go ahead, Bill. Parson: Yeah. I just -- I just want to speak up on behalf of this vacation process that's been discussed this evening and just to be clear on the record, the city is a recommending body on vacation applications to ACHD. They are the decision makers on that sort of application. But looking at -- there is eight homes that take access off of that roadway and there is nothing in code that would allow that road to be vacated and allow them to have access per city code. So, more than likely if the applicant was going to vacate that, city staff would not support that, because we can't. Those homes need to have certain frontages and meet code and take access from a local of street per our -- or access from a street -- a public street and so -- and there is city utilities in that roadway that were constructed with that subdivision. So, the likelihood of getting support for vacating that roadway is probably pretty minimal. That's not -- probably wouldn't happen. And so I just -- I just want to be very clear on the record that there is lots of things to take into consideration when we are talking about vacating right of way and in this particular stance, looking at what's already developed in the area, more than likely I don't see ACHD or the city supporting that -- that option to move forward with a vacation application. But, again, thank you for your time. I just wanted to be clear on the record for that --with that request. Or at least that portion of the testimony that came in tonight. Fitzgerald: So, basically, you are saying you are just a buzzkill. Parsons: Yeah. I'm Debbie Downer tonight. Fitzgerald: No. I appreciate the insight. Thank you. Commissioner Holland, go right ahead. Holland: Mr. Chair, just a follow up for Bill. So, Bill, if we made a recommendation that that would become an emergency and pedestrian access, rather than a vacation request, would that make it any different to you in the comment just made? Parsons: No. I think the Commission's had the appropriate testimony on that this evening, stating the findings that there is other options for connectivity in the future. ACHD has made a recommendation already to you this evening and they have supported the applicant and the neighborhood to request to allow that to be a temporary emergency access and certainly in my experience with the city, yes, the Council has granted those requests and has -- has not required streets to stub through the developments. Now, have we paid for that -- those decisions? Yes. That -- those always haven't been the best decisions. We want neighborhoods to be connected. But, again, as Sonya has Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 51 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 49 of 54 mentioned to you in her testimony, that's within your purview to make that recommendation onto City Council and they have the ultimate decision to determine whether or not that's in the best interest of the public to have that as an emergency only or require that to be punched through. Holland: Thanks, Bill. Parsons: You're welcome. Pitzer: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Pitzer, go right ahead, ma'am. Pitzer: So, if we have Dashwood as a -- as a temporary emergency for ten years, can we still have a stub street with an east-west egress to the north? They might lose one lot on that side, but where they have a private drive that could easily become a stub street, so they would have an additional exit for that subdivision and still keep Dashwood as a -- as a temporary. Fitzgerald: I think that's the concept is as the other ones get built out that one can stay there as a temporary, but -- I mean, sorry, as an emergency access and it can almost become permanent, if that would be our recommendation. As other streets get built out they have other secondary accesses that are out there. Parsons: Yeah. Certainly -- if -- if I may, Mr. Chair. Fitzgerald: Absolutely. Parsons: So, just like Sonya spoke to you about the code, we try -- we try to limit the amount of access points to collector roads as well and the applicant's already proposing one connection point to that collector street. When that property to the west develops certainly there is another opportunity to -- to tie back into that neighborhood and also the Champion Park neighborhood. There is actually a stub street that will be extended with that -- two stub streets that are stubbed to the property to the west of the property that we are discussing this evening. So, we certainly have it set up in that area to where these neighborhoods will connect if it was the Commission's desire not to require that to be extended at this time and have it as an emergency access only. So, I don't -- in my opinion I'm not a -- I'm not a transportation planner, but I don't think there is a need for another stub street to Centrepoint Way from this development. The one should be fine with the emergency access and still meet Fire Department code and city code. Fitzgerald: Commissioner Pitzer, did you have any follow up there? Or did that answer your question? Pitzer: No. Thank you. Thank you, Bill. Thank you. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 52 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 50 of 54 Cassinelli: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Cassinelli. Cassinelli: If I can just get clarification from Bill. Are you saying that -- that the city would oppose a -- if Alpine Pointe were to seek a permanent closure on Dashwood, even after Centrepoint went through, if there was -- if there was additional connectivity out Jasmine? Parsons: Would we oppose the connectivity? I guess I'm not following you -- Cassinelli: Correct. Parsons: -- Commissioner. Are you -- Cassinelli: If you -- so, if -- if tonight in addition is that we follow that -- that we actually are in support of ACHD's recommendation that this become a temporary -- Dashwood become a temporary emergency, so it's emergency and pedestrian only temporarily for ten years or until Centrepoint was through, if the residents of -- of Alpine Pointe were to petition ACHD to make that permanent, are you saying that you would oppose that is my question. Parsons: Well, what I was -- Mr. Chair, Members of the Commission, Commissioner Cassinelli, what I was speaking to the city would not be able to support the request to vacate the right of way, to prohibit the extension of that roadway. We -- we just can't because of the infrastructure that's in there. But certainly if the City Council wants to make that a permanent closure they can certainly do that in their deliberations as it moves forward. I'm not sure if they will have the appetite to go against what ACHD has put on the table with the ten years. A lot can change in ten years. Maybe the connectivity wants to be there in ten years given all the other properties may have develop around it and it may make sense to extend it or ten years from now maybe all the roads are connected and we decide it's not warranted and they can revisit that with ACHD in ten years from now. But either way my point was we couldn't support the vacation of the right of way to -- to disallow the connection of the roadway. Allen: Mr. Chair? Cassinelli: I -- Fitzgerald: Hold one second. Bill, do you want to finish or follow up? Cassinelli: I just want -- yeah. Sorry. Not that -- not to be vacating it, but just to have it a -- maintain that emergency access only. Or are you saying -- is that the same as vacating the right of way? Parsons: No. Vacating the right of way and creating a permanent emergency access are two different things. Vacating the right of way means you vacate it -- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 53 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 51 of 54 Cassinelli: Okay. Parsons: -- and it becomes private property and the homeowners buy it back and they don't have -- no one has the right to use it, but those who own the property. It's no longer public -- public land. It becomes private property and we don't want to create eight homeowners trying to determine who is going to maintain that in the future and the city doesn't want to have to execute independent easements with eight different property owners to have access over their sewer and water mains. It's going to get messy for us. So, that's why I said vacation, in my opinion, is not an option at this point. The option is the Commission wants it to be a temporary emergency access as approved by ACHD commission. You have that authority to -- to recommend that to City Council and City Council will determine whether or not they want it to be a permanent emergency access or side with ACHD and make it -- have a ten year -- ten year extension on that and we revisit it later -- at a later date or until such time as that Centrepoint is connected. Again, we made our recommendation to this body. Sonya was very clear that she's asked for it to be extended with the first phase and we have to. That's what our code tells us to do. We are just doing our jobs and letting you know that it is our policy and our ordinance to require stub streets to be extended and this is a stub street that we think needs to be extended and provide access is this development. So, again, it's within your purview to make a recommendation based on the testimony that you heard this evening and let the City Council determine what the course -- what decision -- what decision they want to make on that -- that topic. Allen: So, Mr. Chair? Cassinelli: Thank you. That's clear. Fitzgerald: Yes. Sonya, go right ahead. Allen: This is Sonya. I just have a follow up to Bill's comments. So, just to reiterate, as it -- as it sits today ACHD is requiring Dashwood to eventually extend as a public street once Centrepoint goes through. If Council determines that they don't want to see Dashwood extend as a public street in the future, that could be part of their approval, in which case the applicant could possibly request to vacate from ACHD the portion of the right of way, which is approximately ten feet at the terminus of the cul-de-sac. That would, then, allow the public utilities, the city services, to remain in Dashwood for those lots to have their street frontage and all the items that Bill mentioned. I'm not saying whether the city would be supportive of that, just saying that might be an option if Council were determined that they didn't feel it was appropriate for Dashwood to extend in the future. So, I just wanted to throw that out. Thank you. Fitzgerald: Appreciate it. I think that -- I mean in my thought process the -- by giving a ten year, leaving it where ACHD did, it gives us a window to look at what else connects in there in ten years. I don't want to vacate anything right now. I think by putting it in as a temporary emergency access, it lets the homeowners know that there is a discussion that's taking place between the city and ACHD and there is connections that are going to Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 54 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 52 of 54 happen, hopefully, with additional development around them and they can raise the termination then and get ready-- get their ducks in a row and prep for what's coming. But it doesn't -- I give the applicant a ton of credit for stepping up and saying even though this is not what I know the city wants, I'm going to do what the owners are asking me to do and that is to make that road Dashwood an emergency access for this period of time. I mean it gives us a snapshot window. Pitzer: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: Commissioner Pitzer. Cassinelli: Mr. Chair? Fitzgerald: One second, Commissioner Cassinelli. Commissioner Pitzer, go ahead. Pitzer: Thank you. Sorry about that. So, I was just looking -- Cassinelli: No, I just -- go -- go ahead. Go ahead. Pitzer: Thank you. The Zebulon Heights No. 2, it looks like on -- on the City Council, from what I'm looking at, it looks like ACHD approved Dashwood as a cul-de-sac and that the City of Meridian City Council back in 2009 wanted the -- Dashwood to be a street so that it would not Iandlock the southern parcel. So, in answer to that there was no instruction there to -- to add signage like it did on Rogue River, but it looks like they -- like they wanted to have that connectivity, so that that parcel would not be landlocked when Jasmine Street was -- was vacated, so -- Fitzgerald: That is kind of what Bill and Sonya have outlined. That's the -- Pitzer: That's correct. Correct. I was just saying I found that in the -- in the record. Fitzgerald: That makes good texture. Thank you very much for that. That's great information. Commissioner Holland, do you have anything you wanted to -- I think you have kept -- tried to talk a couple times and I cut you off. I apologize. Holland: No. I'm good. I think Commissioner Cassinelli had something to share. I'm ready to attempt making a motion, but I will wait until everybody is done discussing first. Fitzgerald: Yeah. Commissioner Cassinelli, go ahead. I cut you off, sir. Cassinelli: Well, I -- and I was -- I was also going to attempt to make a motion, but -- Fitzgerald: Go for it, man. Cassinelli: What's that? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 55 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 53 of 54 Fitzgerald: Go for it. If you have got it, go for it. Cassinelli: I think she raised her hand first, but I will -- I will give it a go, see how it -- see how it sounds. So, after considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to recommend approval to the City Council of file number H-2019-0027, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 16th, 2020, with the following modifications: Number one, that-- that we recommend to City Council to follow ACHD's approval on that connection of Dashwood as a temporary emergency access with pedestrian connection until Centrepoint Way is extended to Wainwright or within ten years, whichever occurs first. Maintain the single story lots on the -- homes on the west side. I'm -- I am okay with eliminating condition 2-D to finish -- I believe that's the one to finish -- to curb and gutter the east side of Centrepoint until such time as the multi-family is developed in phase three and also work with -- want to phrase it right -- on the -- on the trees. That the applicant would work to keep as many of the mature trees along Jasmine on the southern portion as possible. Seal: I think that the 2-13, Bravo, is the -- the one for them to eliminate the need for the stub on Centrepoint Way as it comes up on the east side. And -- and there is already something in -- that discusses the trees basically. Fitzgerald: Tree mitigation. Seal: I mean in layman's terms it just says whatever the -- whatever is not cut down for firewood should be gone through with the city mitigation standards, which is all we can impress on that anyway. Holland: Mr. Chair and Bill, did you want -- did you want to allow them to do bonus rooms on the west side? In your motion. Or did you want them only to be single story? Cassinelli: I heard some -- I heard a -- some additional feedback on that after I said something to the effect. I would be -- I would be -- I would be amenable to --to suggesting bonus rooms. McCarvel: Second. Cassinelli: On a -- Fitzgerald: Sonya and Bill, do you have a good handle on what just got laid out? Allen: Chairman, Commissioners, this is Sonya. If I could just reiterate the motion, so to make sure I understand. Fitzgerald: Yes, ma'am. Please do. Allen: You are in agreement with ACHD's approval on Dashwood and Centrepoint. You want the homes along the west boundary to be restricted to single story, but allowed a Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 56 of 98 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 16,2020 Page 54 of 54 bonus room. And I would like clarification whether that means no second story windows on the back. I assume it does. Clarification on that, please. And defer the buffer in the sidewalk on the east side of Centrepoint to phase three as requested by the applicant and to retain as many of the existing trees as possible along the southern boundary. Fitzgerald: Does the motion maker you want to clarify on the no windows in the bonus room from the back? Was that what your intention was? Cassinelli: That is -- that is my intention as Sonya laid that out. Fitzgerald: Okay. Does the second agree? Cassinelli: No windows in back. McCarvel: Sure. Fitzgerald: Okay. We have a motion and a second to recommend approval of file number H-2019-0027 with modifications. All those in favor say aye. Any opposed? Motion passes. Thanks, team. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Fitzgerald: Sonia, thank you for walking us through that. That was an intense one. So, we appreciate it. Hethe, thank you for being here and for your input and good luck and -- and that, I hope everybody's healthy and safe and we appreciate all you are doing and please stay that way. I need one more motion. Holland: I was going to say -- Mr. Chair, I move we adjourn the public hearing for the Planning and Zoning Commission of April 16th, 2020. Seal: Second. McCarvel: Second. Fitzgerald: All in favor? Motion passes. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9.01 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS.) APPROVED RYAN FITZGERALD - CHAIRMAN DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 23,2020— Page 57 of 98 E IDIAN IDAHO 10morw PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING Agenda Item Number: 3 A Item Title: Approve Minutes of April 2, 2020 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting. Meeting Notes: (�E IDI y ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item - 3.A. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item -Approve Minutes of April 2, 2020 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Upload Date Meeting Minutes Minutes 4/6/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 3 of 265 Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission April 2,2020 Page 51 of 51 McCarvel: Second. Fitzgerald: I have a motion and a second for adjournment. All those in favor say aye. Any opposed? Thank you all. Cassinelli: Thank you for putting this all together, staff. Fitzgerald: Yeah. Awesome job, staff. We appreciate it. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:45 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS.) APPROVED 4 116 12020 RYAN FITZGERALD - CHAIRMAN DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 54 of 265 E IDIAN IDAHO 10morw PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING Agenda Item Number: 3 B Item Title: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Hidden Gem Events (H- 2020-0015) Meeting Notes: CiQ fE I� ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item - 3.13. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Hidden Gem Events (H-2020-0015) by Elizabeth Burgess, Located at 134 E. State Ave. ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Upload Date Findings Findings/Orders 4/6/2020 Exhibit A Exhibit 4/6/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 55 of 265 CITY OF MERIDIAN V IDIAN�-- FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND 1DAHO DECISION& ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Conditional Use Permit for Hidden Gem Events,Located at 134 E. Stave Ave.in the Old Town Zoning District,by Elizabeth Burgess. Case No(s).H-2020-0015 For the Planning& Zoning Commission Hearing Date of: April 2, 2020(Findings on April 16, 2020) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 2, 2020, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 2,2020, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 2, 2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 2,2020, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code,and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian,which was adopted April 19,2011,Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this decision,which shall be signed by the Chairman of the Commission and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Planning Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER CASE NO(S).H-2020-0015 Page 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 56 of 265 7. That this approval is subject to the conditions of approval in the attached staff report for the hearing date of April 2, 2020, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the Planning & Zoning Commission's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11- 5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Conditional Use Permit is hereby approved in accord with the conditions of approval in the staff report for the hearing date of April 2,2020,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Two(2)Year Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit,when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City in accord with UDC 11-513-6F.1. During this time,the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting,the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two(2)year period in accord with UDC 11-513-617.2. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-513-6.17.1,the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one(1)two (2)year period. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the Commission may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or Commission may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, a denial of a conditional use permit entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28)days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff report for the hearing date of April 2,2020 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER CASE NO(S).H-2020-0015 Page 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 57 of 265 By action of the Planning&Zoning Commission at its regular meeting held on the 16th day of April ,2020. COMMISSIONER RYAN FITZGERALD, CHAIRMAN VOTED AYE COMMISSIONER LISA HOLLAND,VICE CHAIRMAN VOTED AYE COMMISSIONER RHONDA MCCARVEL VOTED AYE COMMISSIONER ANDREW SEAL VOTED AYE COMMISSIONER PATRICIA PITZER VOTED AYE COMMISSIONER WILLIAM CASSINELLI VOTED AYE COMMISSIONER NICK GROVE VOTED AYE Ryan Fitzgerald, Chairman Attest: Chris Johnson,City Clerk Copy served upon the Applicant,the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and the City Attorney. By: Dated: 4-16-2020 City Clerk's Office CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER CASE NO(S).H-2020-0015 Page 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 58 of 265 STAFF REPORT C:�*%- W IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 4/2/2020 Legend DATE: 0 I01Project Location TO: Planning&Zoning Commission a FROM: Joe Dodson,Associate Planner �C 208-884-5533 ® � . Bruce Freckleton,Development Services Manager a 208-887-2211 ®®LLLL ® 1 SUBJECT: H-2020-0015 ®�®®t ` Hidden Gem Events LOCATION: 134 E. State Avenue I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Request for a conditional use permit(CUP) for an event center(Arts, Entertainment or Recreation Facility, Indoors and Outdoors) on 0.32 of an acre of land in the O-T zoning district, by Elizabeth Burgess. The CUP request is located in an existing and historic home in downtown Meridian. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 0.32 acres Future Land Use Designation Old Town Existing Land Use(s) Commercial Proposed Land Use(s) Commercial Lots(#and type;bldg./common) One(1)building lot Neighborhood meeting date;#of February 5,2020;four(4)attendees attendees: History(previous approvals) Multiple promotional sales unit permits; C-TI-2020-0047 for a hair salon that will share part of the existing building. No other hearing or administrative level applications. Page 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 59 of 265 B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Yes,letter stating no conditions or impact fees • Requires ACHD Commission No Action(yes/no) Access(Arterial/Collectors/State Lot has driveway access for existing structure;other access Hwy/Loca1)(Existing and Proposed) is via existing on-street parallel parking. Existing Road Network Yes Fire Service • Distance to Fire Station 0.9 miles from Fire Station#1 • Fire Response Time 3:00 minute response time from Station#1 • Accessibility This project meets all required access requirements. • Additional Comments This project site can be serviced by the Meridian Fire Department,but the fire department has concerns about parking.The information given by the applicant in regards to parking assumes no one else is doing business in the downtown area and no one else is using any of the parking available,The occupant load of the yard is 257.Enforcing a max limit of 150 people for the City or Fire Department is not feasible.The parking plan should reflect the maximum occupant load of the space available during normal Monday through Friday business hours and during weekend hours for the businesses open.It should also reflect the fact of the residences in the area and the space they are taking up. C. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map I, 1 _- Legend ,- E � Legend '^GRUBER Project Location v~i 0 � AVE ® Project Location t~if VE. Z r E BADLEY Z AVE _� ZC: a z N Medium a z a• �' a�CI icL z Density o sT _LU rON AVE Residential w _7 LC111 r ZEJT E STAT F- N'� Z S f F,Tar a .. W ��, Old Toiwn� I- �7 W W T -- L„ LA � � z z z � r: Q� z IDAHO AVE - r'1 N � 3 IIK7 3 3 Z ADWAY AVE z. A ♦'r i�r i ' .-t u LGeneral r Industrial•— Zoning Map Planned Development Map Page 2 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 60 of 265 Legend R�410 R- 0 Legend BAR Project Location J� Q-T�R-8 aProject Location kA VE p0-T Z -City Limits FZ r E BADLE - - L_O — _ a AVE O-T T Planned Parcels L OSO-T N R=4' Q C Cz O-T �v wnsHi ��Z cW O-Tj R-15 �TT1� a� - m:_, 4 C-C L-O TT1 R-8 5T a� � E CARLTON AV - � L E S Al RVE " to .]�S fT V) LA Uj, o = O-T Z�LE STIIAIl c aVE c = w VI MUj R-�15 N Z z LAkg 40 N Uj Z z - O• -T Z E IDAHO AVER RUT Z E IDAHO,IaVE, Ri$J w 1 i ICI Or=�-T�I��On T E BROADWAY AVE Z O-T- E BROADWAY A� 110 `,-Li 1-L M1 77-7 LT�Tm III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Ashley Buzzini—725 E. 2nd Street,Meridian,ID 83642 B. Owner: Elizabeth Burgess— 1905 W. Merganser Drive,Meridian,ID 83642 C. Representative: neUdesign Architecture—725 E. 2nd Street,Meridian,ID 83642 IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper Notification 3/13/2020 Radius notification mailed to properties within 300 feet 3/11/2020 Site Posting Date 3/6/2020 NextDoor posting 3/12/2020 V. STAFF ANALYSIS A. Future Land Use Map Designation(hgps://www.meridiancity.org/compplan) Old Town Designation—This designation includes the historic downtown and the true community center. The boundary of the Old Town district predominantly follows Meridian's historic plat boundaries. In several areas, both sides of a street were incorporated into the boundary to encourage similar uses and complimentary design of the facing houses and buildings. Sample uses include offices, retail and lodging, theatres, restaurants, and service retail for surrounding residents and visitors. A variety of Page 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020- Page 61 of 265 residential uses are also envisioned and could include reuse of existing buildings, new construction of multi-family residential over ground floor retail or office uses. B. Comprehensive Plan Policies(https://www.meridiancity.orglcompplan): • "Support a compatible mix of land uses Downtown that activate the area during day and night." (2.09.02G).Adding an event space into the Downtown area brings an opportunity for additional foot traffic and commerce to occur within a desired location during day and night, adding to the appeal and character of Downtown Meridian. This additional commercial use should be a welcome addition to the other uses in the surrounding area. Per the conditions of approval in this staff report, any outdoor event is required to end no later than eleven o'clockp.m. This condition will allow the character of the residential aspect of this neighborhood to remain. In addition, the applicant has stated in their narrative a desire to hold smaller events but with the opportunity to host a few larger ones. • "Support owners of historic buildings in their efforts to restore and/or preserve their properties. (5.02.0113).Allowing an event center to take place in a historic downtown home will help spread the knowledge and history of both Meridian and this historic home. The economic impact of additional foot traffic should also help other historic locations within Downtown to flourish. C. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: The main structure on this site is an existing home that was converted to commercial use in line with Old Town standards. The existing structure is commonly known as the historic Tolleth House and recognized on the Nation Register of Historic Places. The desire to maintain the historical significance of this structure is strong and therefore there are no proposed changes to the exterior of the structure. In addition, the property has a 6- foot tall wooden fence that lines its north property line and a 4-foot tall open vision fence on its south property line. The west property line and fencing abuts the owner's home, located at 120 E. Stave Ave. D. Proposed Use Analysis: An outdoor event center falls under"Arts, entertainment or recreation facility, outdoors" in UDC Table 11-2D-2. It is subject to specific use standards and is also listed as a conditional use in the O-T zoning district. See narrative included in the application for more specific details on the proposed use. E. Specific Use Standards(UDC 11-4-3): Arts, Entertainment or Recreation Facility, Outdoors is subject to specific use standards as outlined in UDC 11-4-3-2: A. General Standards: 1. All outdoor recreation areas and structures that are not fully enclosed shall maintain a minimum setback of one hundred feet(100) from any abutting residential districts. The playing areas of golf courses, including golf tees, fairways, and greens, are an exception to this standard. (Ord. 07-1325, 7-10-2007). The properties abutting the subject site are all zoned Old Town (O-T). Old Town zoning district is a traditional neighborhood Page 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 62 of 265 (mixed-use) district, allowing both residential and commercial uses with an intent to be truly mixed use in its development and density. Therefore, Staff finds that this 100 foot setback requirement does not apply as Old Town is not solely a residential district. However, Staff understands the concern of noise emitting across property lines. There are adjacent residential uses to this property but the closest residence will be to the west and is the home of the owner of this business. If any outdoor event were to take place in the existing yard as intended, there is not a feasible method to maintain a 100 foot setback to the owner's home at 120 E. State Ave. To the east and south of the subject site, existing local streets with parallel parking and street trees provide separation and act as a buffer; the property to the north is a commercial law office separated by an alleyway and existing closed vision fencing. Staff is recommending additional conditions to help mitigate any potential sound or light pollution. Therefore, when complying with the conditions in this report, Staff finds that the site elements meet the intent of this requirement. 2. No outdoor event or activity center shall be located within fifty feet(50) of any property line and shall operate only between the hours of six o'clock(6:00) A.M. and eleven o'clock(11:00) P.M.Applicant shall comply with these standards; Staff is recommending a condition of approval to ensure compliance (see Section VIII.1). 3. Accessory uses including,but not limited to, retail, equipment rental, restaurant, and drinking establishments may be allowed if designed to serve patrons of the use only.Any accessory use held on this site shall be for the attendees of the event only and not open to the general public. 4. Outdoor speaker systems shall comply with section 11-3A-13, "Outdoor Speaker Systems", of this title.Applicant shall comply with this and all relevant code sections upon approval. B. Additional Standards For Swimming Pools: Any outdoor swimming pool shall be completely enclosed within a six foot (6)nonscalable fence that meets the requirements of the building code in accord with title 10, chapter 1, of this code.No swimming pool is proposed as part of this project. C. Additional Standards For Outdoor Stage Or Musical Venue: Any use with a capacity of one hundred(100) seats or more or within one thousand feet (1,000') of a residence or a residential district shall be subject to approval of a conditional use permit. (Ord. 05- 1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005). Not all events will have outdoor music but in the event that one does, the applicant is applying for this conditional use permit. Staff is proposing conditions of approval to mitigate any negative impacts outdoor music may have on the neighborhood. F. Dimensional Standards(UDC 11-2): The existing home meets all dimensional standards. See specific use standard analysis above for further discussion. G. Access(UDC 11-3A-3, 11-3H-4): Access is provided via public on-street parking stalls on E. State Avenue and NE. 2"d Street, and an alleyway to the north. Page 5 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 63 of 265 H. Parking(UDC 11-3C): The existing home has a driveway off of the alleyway that has been turned into an outdoor patio space and is closed off from the alleyway by a 6-foot tall wooden fence; there is currently no off-street parking on this site. The proposed site occupancy is 257 occupants, per Fire and Building code. Old-Town is classified as a Traditional Neighborhood zoning district and no off-street parking is required for a lawfully existing structure unless an addition occurs (UDC 11- 3C-6B). No additions are proposed with this project or related building permits. However, the applicant understands parking is a concern and has provided a parking plan to Staff. The Applicant has provided a parking plan with all available public parking within 1,000 feet, and has used Old-Town alternative parking methods from UDC 11-3C-7 as a guide to address parking concerns. According to the Applicant's plan there are approximately 327 available parking spots that include both on and off-street parking(Exhibit VII.Q. The Applicant has also obtained a parking agreement with a private business for after hour parking that accounts for 19 off-street parking spots and is also seen on the parking plan (All American Insurance). See Exhibit VII.D for the signed parking agreement. This parking area is on the west side of Main Street, an arterial road, and concerns Staff whether it would be used because of its location. Staff would like the applicant to explain how they will educate and inform patrons of where to park during the P&Z Commission meeting. Staff is also concerned with the parking intensity associated with such a high occupant capacity. Because of this, Staff is recommending a condition of approval to limit the occupancy to 100 people knowing that enforcing such a condition will be very difficult (see Section VIII.2). If the applicant or owner can obtain more parking agreements per the conditions in this report, the maximum occupancy can increase to 150. The Applicant's parking plan assumes that all off-site parking is available most of the time. For example, it does not appear to account for the fact the Masonic Temple parking lot is only public parking from 6 am to 6 pm and those 34 off-street parking spaces will not be available for evening events held at the subject site. Further, this parking lot is located across an arterial street, Pine Avenue, making it very impractical for event goer use. During evening events, additional nearby parking agreements would help alleviate any unavailable on-street parking being utilized by residents in the neighborhood after normal work hours. I. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-17): There is existing five-foot(5) detached sidewalks along E. State Ave. and NE 2nd St. with existing street trees that connects with the entrance to the Tolleth House. No additional sidewalks are proposed; all sidewalks meet UDC Standards. J. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): There is no additional landscaping proposed and the Applicant has stated that all existing landscaping will be protected in place. In order to help alleviate any undue noise and light disturbances to the nearby residential uses, staff is recommending a condition of approval to add additional landscaping along the southern fence line (see Section HIT 4) Page 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 64 of 265 K. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All existing fencing will remain in place and no additional fencing is required. The existing fencing meets UDC standards. Staff finds that additional landscaping is a better alternative to additional closed vision fencing to help mitigate any noise and light pollution. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed conditional use permit with the conditions in Section VIII per the Findings in Section IX. Page 7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 65 of 265 VII. EXHIBITS A. Site Plan(date: 1/13/2020) _ - 8 IiNAD 1N3A� °o o a 04; VAO NHOOIH 8 NOIVS JIVH 3h❑00 �rl w Ci q 6. Z Q k =_ 9 6 t e Fay na r m'sb z Page 8 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 66 of 265 B. Applicant Narrative(date: 2/12/2020) Atfn: Meridian Planning Department Meridian City Hall n e design 33 E. Broadway,Suite 102 Meridian, ID 8364240 ARCHITECTURE Re: Tolleth House Tenant Improvement 134 E.State Avenue. Meridian, ID,83642 Design Narrative: February 12fh,2020 F.A.Nourses Second Addition Subdivision is located in the Old Town zoning district of Downtown Meridian.The subdivision is full of different types of businesses and various architectural elements.The tenant improvements will be located at the historic Tolleth House, built in 1907 the home Is recognized on the National Register of Historic Places.The Tollefh House holds a lot of historical significance,the overarching goal of each tenant improvement is to keep the historical building elements intact. The Tolleth Houses prior use served as a local antique shop and held community events.The new proposed use for the historic home will be the new location of the local, Do Dye Hair Salon and new Hidden Gem Events businesses.The two tenants are both owned by local business owner Elizabeth Burgess. Elizabeth will also own and reside in the adjacent home 120 E.State Avenue, January of 2020, the property is located directly behind the Tolleth House. The tenant improvement packets for the historic home will be separated into two tenant spaces a small salon space accompanied by a small event center.The Salon permit package was submitted January 13th 20202 to the City of meridian for review.The Event Center tenant improvement package will be submitted for review of a later date after undergoing the process of obtaining a conditional use permit. Hidden Gem Events will be 1,658 SF of the existing space.All events will be held on the ground level,the second level will be used for office space only. Hidden Gem Events can accommodate various types of events,experiences can be hosted both indoors and outdoors. Hidden Gem Events will only allow for 150 occupants during hosted events.Outdoor events will take place in the backyard of the property during the warmer months of the year.To accomplish this we must obtain a conditional use permit.The Event center has acknowledged the standards in chapter four and will abide by all rules and regulations. After holding the neighborhood meeting on Wednesday February 5fh,we learned that the surrounding neighbors are an board for the future use of the Historic Tolleth House.Surround neighbors have agreed to share their parking lots with Elizabeth during the time of events.The community has been supportive of the growth and flourishment that Elizabeth has planned for the community. It is our belief that the proposed use of the space enhances the charm, appeal and marketability of the whole corner. Page 9 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 67 of 265 Parking: Events: -Coordinating with All American Insurance to share their parking lot when necessary for events. -Public parking within 1,000 feet will accommodate parking needs. -Street Parking is pre established by the City of Meridian. -2 hour parking from 8am-6pm Parking Analysis On-streef parking (1000 feet from building) 179 provided on street parking spots within building proximity 11 -2 hour parking spots Total on street parking= 190 Spots Parking Analysis:All off-street parking Public Parking: Lot adjacent to Masonic Temple=34 spots Lot adjacent to Eight Thirty Common=20 Spots Post Office Parking=64 Spots Parking Agreement: All American Insurance=l4 Spots Total oft-street oarkina available=137 soots TOTAL AMOUNT OF PARKING WITHIN 1000 FEET OF THE BUILDING=327 PARKING SPOTS 5ife Plan: ■ Access-The building sits on a public street in meridian. 134 E.State Ave. ■ Street Layout and Internal circulation-existing,has been approved by the City of Meridian ■ Pedestrian Walkways and Facilities-A concrete sidewalk is existing directly outside of the entryways,allowing access into the multi use building.The building will provide egress doors that will be used for every day access into the building. ■ No walls will be demolished,only one interior door way is to be filled ■ Demolition of existing plumbing. • The existing Tolleth house is 2,498 SF-The basement is included in the total square footage but will be for mechanical use only. • The Do Dye Hair Salon is 343 SF ■ The Hidden Gem Event Center is 1,658 SF • The backyard is 3,861 SF Page 10 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020- Page 68 of 265 C. Parking Plan(date: 3/13/2020) QE"C, : 1.rJ� :.:J}SJi rn Nl M •nix vao�ua W Q Z W Z ftf tY W I F IIL - ��� - I �I - �❑w G y ■A fllORi DMLIF jum n� IAId"r1 M14LLAlf G1 rLm vALcxcsnls xnl x vorLa I';u011x M1[MG4d4 d1T i IL]AP!lii1GT}9wl Hx.,hn ' � 13rAl do Yl�flYl Lllf MilGI'! r ]Ir 51"¢r GrHY4 lL:�� �" J rv�I1C WA1JG: ICi1 � - LIXMJ.CPT'7liwso-"cRNx14M5M15 'S Fczromw L.ials rs.a " ` r�LJ.,�:acxnTru..xcr-lasras 101XldRi}R li�iv f+.i+uau FIJP 1lpl 111M1M1dLYVLIW!•fQ"IJ�f 1109 KR_YJMxa ra LsalyAtt xmlJ I m5 Ri18 TCr6.LLlII,LY!l r.W M OliCf."./JyX.MC[YTII F c,oK.�''•:'.nF MtiIX•lltrr idIX llL}pAipIG1TA,Q44 - .aTlor.ATv¢ Page 11 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 69 of 265 D. Parking Agreement(date: 3/3/2020) Date: y�a To whom it may concern, This letter confirms that Hidden Gem Events, LLC has permission to park on our property in the parking lot located at 58 E. Pine Avenue in Meridian Idaho(Parcel No R6129000060)to accommodate vehicles of persons attending events sponsored by Hidden Gem Events, LLC at their facility at 134 E State Avenue in Meridian Idaho. This use is subject to events occurring during non-business hours with prior notification by Hidden Gem Events of the planned use,and approval of JM Ranch, LLC. Siacefeli, 9 JM Ranch, LLC NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT State of Idaho County of Ada On this��day of 144 C 2020, before me, a notary public for the State of personally appeared A; f d J 1}�� (Name of Signer), known or identified to me (or proved to me on the oath of �_JCgr&1*',V rullt n oidea' )to be the manager or a member of the limited liability company that executed the instrument or the person who executed the instrument on behalf of said limited liability company,and acknowledged to me that such limited liability company executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. �` �• (Seal) Signatures otary Pub ,bra c-I r� /��/C A.KYLE NOTARY PUBLIC Printed Na We of Notary ublic STATE OF IDAHO OOMMISSION R34233 Commission Expiration Date: o o� MY COMMIS&lONIXPIRE Page 12 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 70 of 265 VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning 1. The Applicant shall comply with the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-9 Daycare Facilities,including but not limited to the following: a. Any outdoor event shall only operate between the hours of six o'clock(6:00) A.M. and eleven o'clock (11:00) P.M. b. Accessory uses including,but not limited to, retail, equipment rental, restaurant, and drinking establishments may be allowed if designed to serve patrons of the use only, and not the general public. c. Any outdoor speaker systems shall comply with section 11-3A-13, "Outdoor Speaker Systems", 2. The maximum number of allowable clients/guests at the facility at one time shall be limited to one-hundred(100). 3. With the application for Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC), the Applicant or owner shall obtain and provide a copy to staff, additional parking agreements to account for at least 50 more dedicated off-street parking spaces. At which time, the maximum occupancy listed in condition number two above may increase to one hundred and fifty (150) clients/guests. 4. With the Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) submittal, the Applicant shall include on the landscape plan, a 5-foot wide landscape bed to the interior of the 4-foot wrought iron fence that runs along the southern property line with trees and shrubs commensurate with landscaping requirements in UDC 11-3B-7C.3 to help mitigate any noise and/or light pollution. B. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) https:llweblink.meridiancily.or lWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=183872&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ity C. Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) https:llweblink.meridianciU.oLglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=183932&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC hty D. Nampa&Meridian Irrigation District(NMID) https:llweblink.meridianciU.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=184502&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Ry E. Meridian Fire Department(MFD) https:11web1ink.meridianciU.orb/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=184389&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianC hty Page 13 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 71 of 265 IX. FINDINGS A. Conditional Use Permit The Commission shall base its determination on the conditional use permit request upon the following: 1. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located. The site meets all the dimensional and development regulations in the O-T zoning district for the proposed use. Therefore, Commission finds the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use. 2. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian comprehensive plan and in accord with the requirements of this title. Commission finds the proposed event center will be harmonious with the Comprehensive Plan in that it will provide an additional use in the Downtown Meridian area and add to intensity of uses desired in Old Town. 3. That the design, construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area. Commission finds the operation of the proposed event center, with the conditions imposed, should be compatible with the other commercial and residential uses in the area and will not adversely change the essential character of the Downtown area but instead will add to the character. 4. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. If the proposed event center complies with the conditions of approval in Section VII as required, Commission finds the proposed use should not adversely affect other properties in the vicinity. 5. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, schools, parks, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer. The site is part of the City's Downtown area and these services are already being provided to the building. Therefore, Commission finds the proposed use will be served adequately by all public facilities and services. 6. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Commission finds the proposed use should not create any additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Page 14 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 72 of 265 7. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons,property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. Although traffic may increase in this area due to the proposed use, especially when larger events are hosted, the proposed use should not be detrimental to the general welfare because the site, in compliance with the conditions of approval, and conditions of the Downtown area are sufficient to hold such uses. Therefore, Commission finds the proposed event center should not be detrimental to any persons,property, or the general welfare. 8. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30- 2005, eff. 9-15-2005) The Tolleth House is a historic home in Downtown Meridian and all precautions have taken place to maintain its original look and feel in accord with being a part of the National Historic Registry. Commission finds the proposed use should not result in damage of any such features. Page 15 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 73 of 265 E IDIAN IDAHO 10morw PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING Agenda Item Number: 4 A Item Title: Presentation of Staff Report for Urban Renewal Plan for the Union District Urban Renewal Project and First Amendment to the Meridian Revitalization Plan Meeting Notes: CiQ fE I� ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item -4.A. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: Title of Item - Presentation of Staff Report for Urban Renewal Plan for the Union District Urban Renewal Project and FirstAmendment to the Meridian Revitalization Plan ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Upload Date Planning Division Memorandum examining Union District Urban Renewal Plan for Conformity with City of Meridian Cover Memo 4/9/2020 Comprehensive Plan Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 74 of 265 Mayor Robert E. Simison C� E IDIANT.�. City Council Members: =�� Treg Bernt Brad Hoaglun Joe Borton Jessica Perreault I D A H O Luke Cavener Liz Strader April 9, 2020 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Robert Simison Meridian City Council Meridian Planning &Zoning Commission CC: David Miles, Chief of Staff Cameron Arial, Community Development Director Victoria Cleary, Economic Development Administrator Caleb Hood, Planning Division Manager FROM: Caleb Hood, Planning Division Manager Brian McClure, Comprehensive Associate Planner RE: Urban Renewal Plan for the Union District Urban Renewal Project This memo is intended to provide Comprehensive Plan related analysis for the proposed Urban Renewal Plan for the Union District Urban Renewal Project(Union District Plan) in downtown Meridian. Due to the current COVID-19 outbreak and associated quarantine, Staff is including analysis within this memo that otherwise would be shared and explained during the meeting. City Staff will be in virtual attendance at the April 16th Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to give a brief report and summary and to answer any questions, but does not intend to get into many details; this memo should be relied on heavily for Staff s analysis. Application of the City's Comprehensive Plan (Plan)to the proposed Union District area(see Attachment A) is very relevant. Every major theme (chapter) in the Plan ranging from economic development and land use to historic preservation and transportation contain policies that are directly applicable. Additionally, the Comprehensive Plan adopts other documents by reference, for inclusion in consideration of land use decisions and to direct staff activities. Many of the referenced documents are relevant both in geographic area and to the described implementation strategies and goals in the Union District Plan. The following analysis describes the associated text,policies, and referenced plans. Community Development Department . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102, Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 20§T§PAAr`§if ccuk rmgPA AA§EA$rR WYW(P-e1094NAf M61 Analysis Plan Text The implementation strategies and goals stated in the Union District Plan clearly describe activities aimed at stimulating private development through the reduction of blight and the construction or community improvements. Some of the listed activities include: design and construction of infrastructure improvements; acquisition or support in rehabilitation of real property; financial assistance for business; advanced funding for development; and public- private partnership in the construction of a new Community Center. See pages 3-4 and 9-10 of the plan for how the goals of the plan will be achieved. The Evolving Community section(Chapter 3) of the City's Comprehensive Plan, defines future land use typologies. The description for Old Town, the adopted future land use in and around the project area, states: This designation includes the historic downtown and the true community center. The boundary of the Old Town district predominantly follows Meridian's historic plat boundaries. In several areas, both sides of a street were incorporated into the boundary to encourage similar uses and complimentary design of the facing houses and buildings. Sample uses include offices, retail and lodging, theatres, restaurants, and service retail for surrounding residents and visitors. A variety of residential uses are also envisioned and could include reuse of existing buildings, new construction of multi family residential over ground floor retail or office uses. The City has developed specific architectural standards for Old Town and other traditional neighborhood areas. Pedestrian amenities are emphasized in Old Town via streetscape standards. Additional public and quasi public amenities and outdoor gathering area are encouraged. Future planning in Old Town will be reviewed in accordance with Destination Downtown, a visioning document for redevelopment in Downtown Meridian. Please see Chapter 2 Premier Community for more information on Destination Downtown. Sample zoning include O-T. The Old Town future land use designation is the most diverse in the City's land use portfolio, with the greatest combined range of residential and non-residential uses and no caps on density or intensity of developed uses. Further, the City's complimentary zoning, also named Old Town (O-T), has zero setbacks for structures, relaxed parking requirements, and reduced landscape setbacks (aside from pedestrian streetscape infrastructure.) Interestingly, the Union District Plan makes numerous references to the City's planning documents dictating density and character elements,but it is Destination Downtown, developed by the Meridian Development Corporation(MDC), that dictates general uses, building mass and character, and intensity of developments. The City has adopted Destination Downtown by reference, and supports MDC's plan by adopting an eclectic and flexible future land use and zoning designation. With Destination Downtown nearing a decade of use however, existing conditions varying in several significant areas, many new stakeholders and community groups, Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 76 of 265 2 and with the downtown urban renewal district expiring in the upcoming years, it is likely the plan is nearing the end of its relevancy. Plan Policies The following text relates to the policies found throughout the major themes in the Comprehensive Plan (Chapters 2 through 6). Not all policies must be addressed or apply to the Union District Plan,but staff has tried to include all downtown related policies below. Additional context for these policies can be found in the Related Policies section(see Attachment B), which includes parent Goals and Objectives, for the referenced policies. Note: the first number of a policy references the Chapter in which the policy can be found. • 2.02.01 E, Encourage the development of high quality, dense residential and mixed use areas near in and around Downtown, near employment, large shopping centers,public open spaces and parks, and along major transportation corridors, as shown on the Future Land Use Map. A new urban renewal district focused on infrastructure (parking, utilities, etc.) would provide the tools necessary to support and encourage redevelopment in an area of town that suffers from significant blight. • 2.02.02B, Consider incentives such as density bonuses, reduced open space requirements, and reduced fees for infill development in key areas near existing services. A new urban renewal district could provide for incentives such as infrastructure and infrastructure reimbursement through tax increment financing (TIF). • 2.02.02C, Support infill development that does not negatively impact the abutting, existing development. Infill projects in Downtown should develop at higher densities, irrespective of existing development. The Union District Plan does not address how transitions between existing and proposed redevelopment may take place, but could do so transparently as part of negotiations for partnerships with the Urban Renewal District, and through public hearing and administrative approvals with the City. Staff will review future projects for consistency with this policy. The Union District Plan addresses density increases throughout the document. • 2.02.02D, Apply appropriate design and construction standards to infill development in order to reduce adverse impacts to existing development. The Union District Plan makes specific references to establishing performance criteria and design standards in goal `i'(page 4), and duplicated under implementation letter `w' (page 11). They state: In conjunction with the City, the establishment and implementation of performance criteria to assure high site design standards and environmental quality and other design elements which provide unity and integrity to the entire Project Area, including commitment of funds for planning studies, achieving high standards of development, and leveraging such development to achieve public objectives and efficient use of scarce resources. This is critical work to be done proactively, as the City does not have any site or building design standards specific to Downtown (just general traditional neighborhood design), or for policies related to historic preservation and enhancements. NOTE:Development of design Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 77 of 265 3 standards downtown has not been preliminarily identified as a high priority project for the City. • 2.09.01B, Establish incentives to develop gathering spaces and civic facilities within Downtown. A new urban renewal district could provide for incentives such as gathering spaces and civic facilities, which could be reimbursed through tax increment financing(TIF). Part of the Union District Plan specifically references a public private partnership, including the City, for the construction of a community center. • 2.09.01 C, Work towards mitigating and removing floodplain issues around Downtown. There is no floodplain in this area of Downtown. • 2.09.02A, Actively implement action items in the Destination Downtown Plan. Destination Downtown was created by the Meridian Development Corporation for the downtown Urban Renewal District, and adopted by the City. This plan was extremely broad in land use diversity, area, and scope. The project area for the Union District Plan is included within the Destination Downtown area, but previous efforts failed to eliminate blight that this new district seeks to address. With the existing downtown urban renewal set to expire in the coming years, this new district is an opportunity for more renewed and focused efforts, both geographically and in implementation activities. • 2.09.02B, Pursue grants and public-private partnerships to enhance Downtown. A new urban renewal district could both provide grants and make more competitive applications for grants, by utilizing a dedicated funding source such as tax increment financing(TIF). • 2.09.02C, Develop programs with local partners to expand art, cultural, and educational facilities in Downtown. There are several references to these activities and facilities throughout the Union District Plan. Art may be done both as public private partnership, or independent of development, and educational facilities are described in several areas including implementation strategies (letter `o). It should be noted that the Union District Plan describes the Urban Renewal District's ability to make decisions related to public art independent of the Meridian Arts Commission, which to date has focused a great deal of time, money, and energy in downtown. Staff recommends caution with multiple independent entities exercising se of overlaying activities. • 2.09.02D, Develop and support regular cultural activities and events Downtown, in partnership with the Downtown Business Association and other organizations. Supporting events is not described within the Union District Plan directly, but supporting the development of locations for these to occur is addressed. • 2.09.02F, Support a compatible mix of land uses Downtown that activate the area during day and night. Supporting specific uses at discrete times of the day is not described within the Union District Plan directly, but supporting the development of mixed-use locations,facilities, and supporting infrastructure (e.g. —parking) is discussed. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 78 of 265 4 • 2.09.02G, Implement the City of Meridian Design Standards and City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual to ensure that Downtown remains the historic center for mixed-use tourism, business, retail, residential, and governmental activities. The City has land use authority over the project area and implementation of design and architectural standards must be met. However, these standards, while allowing for these types of uses/attractions, does not necessarily cater to or encourage them. Additional work is necessary if downtown specific and historical context is desired. The Union District Plan speaks to this work under goal `i'(page 4), and duplicated under implementation letter `w' (page 11). • 2.09.03B, Promote Ten Mile, Downtown, and The Village as centers of activity and growth. The Union District Plan seeks to redevelop some of the most blighted property in the City, at the heart and center of the Downtown area, and which is otherwise adjacent to some of the most iconic and well used public spaces outside of traditional parks. By successfully redeveloping this highly visible blight, Downtown will be well placed to offer and promote a dense concentration of public spaces for activity use by many. • 2.09.03E, Develop concept plans of potential destination activities and promote appropriate development, infill, and redevelopment of activity centers. The Union District Plan does not address this directly, but the intention of the Plan is to support these types of activities through public private partnerships of community facilities. • 3.03.01E, Encourage infill development. The unstated purpose of the Union District Plan, through virtually all of the goals and implementation strategies, is to encourage infill development through redevelopment of blighted lands and development of community facilities through public private partnerships. • 3.03.03G, Require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks, water and sewer utilities. The City has land use authority over the project area and urban infrastructure will be required with all redevelopment. Further, the Union District Plan calls out specific implementation strategies including road, curb, gutter, streetscape, lighting, stormwater, and others throughout the document(including financial analysis). • 4.04.02A, Identify opportunities for new paths that connect residential neighborhoods and community facilities, such as the library and city hall,parks, schools, athletic facilities, swimming pools, historic districts, the Downtown, as well as other commercial and retail activity centers in Meridian. The City s Pathway Master Plan depicts several options through the project area, and will be required as part of redevelopment of the site. The Union District Plan references pathways both through goals and implementation items. • 4.05.01E, Assess environmental impact of potential new development, infill, and redevelopment. The Union District Plan specifically addresses environmental assessment of brownfield sites, and more generally towards environmental quality and creating standards to maintain environmental quality in coordination with the City (goal letter `i). Outside of floodplain Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 79 of 265 5 impacts however, the City does not have much in the way of requirements or regulations to this end. • 5.02.01A, Maintain and implement design and building standards for historically significant buildings and resources in Old Town. There are no historically significant structures within the project area. The Union District Plan emphasizes consideration for the historic character and quality of the area. Stronger efforts by designers to this end are needed, or standards created, to protect and enhance the general area prior to design and permit approval for structures in this area, if this policy statement is a priority. It would be difficult to suggest that preliminary concepts for structures on either the Civic Block or Union Pacific property compliment or lend aid to any historic themes in the Old Town area. The bulk and mass of concept buildings could easily overwhelm and minimize other historic structures in the area without further integration of ideas and themes. • 6.01.01C, Improve ingress and egress opportunities for all modes of transportation in Downtown. The Union District Plan references improvements to roads, sidewalks,pathways, and a railroad crossing, as projects for implementation. Improvements to East 3rd Street specifically would greatly enhance bicycle access into downtown, and provide more options for local residents and stakeholders. • 6.01.02D, Consider needed sidewalk, pathway, landscaping, and lighting improvements with all land use decisions. The City has land use authority over the project area and redevelopment will be required to provide infrastructure. The Union District Plan also specifically references all of these elements as projects for implementation. • 6.01.021, Pursue the extension of Idaho Ave. and/or Broadway Ave. to Commercial Dr. and the extension of East 3rd St. from Fairview Ave. to Pine Ave. in Downtown. While not directly referencing the extension of these streets,proposed implementation (improvement)projects for both Broadway Ave and East 3rd Street would go a long way in highlighting the value of these projects and encouraging their construction. • 6.01.02L, Work with ACHD to implement projects from the 2012 Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan. While not directly referencing coordination with ACHD on implementation of the 2012 Neighborhood Plan, improvements to East 3rd Street are directly aligned and much needed for north-south bicycle connectivity through Downtown. Neither Meridian Road nor Main Street have dedicated bike facilities, and a safe multi-modal, north-south connection is needed between existing pathway connection on Franklin near Storey Park, and on Pine near Five Mile Creek. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 80 of 265 6 Referenced Plans The following plans are adopted by reference in the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan, and are relevant material to the proposed Union District Plan. • Downtown Meridian Street Cross-section Master Plan Every road within the project area is included within the Downtown Meridian Street Cross- section Master Plan. Adopted in 2014, this document includes cross-section concepts intended to work with minimal impact to available impact, while also serving multiple modes. Vibrant streetscape activity is especially important in the Old Town area, and including the Union District Project area. Connectivity both east-west and north-south through the downtown area is very important. It is particularly important that East 3rd Street incorporate a pathway element to support connectivity of the City's Pathway Master Plan through downtown, connecting Storey Park to Fairview Avenue. Traffic speeds on Meridian Road are unfriendly to pedestrian, and neither Meridian Road nor Main Street provide safe bicycle connectivity north-south, and there is no other railroad crossing within the downtown area besides East 3rd Street. • Historic Preservation Plan The Historic Preservation Commission and City adopted this plan in 2014. With less than 2.2% of Meridian's housing stock being older than 1960's construction (2017 Existing Conditions Report), and almost all of it consolidated in the Downtown area, there is very limited opportunity for historic preservation outside of agricultural themes in the larger community. Several goals from this plan are relevant to the Union District Plan, including: o Goal I Preserve and enhance Meridian's historical, cultural and agricultural heritage. o Goal 3 Heighten public awareness of historic preservation in the community and improve preservation education efforts for various audiences. o Goal 4 Maintain and strengthen support for historic preservation from individuals, commercial property owners, local organizations and neighborhood groups. These goals for the Commission (and City) are not just about preserving, but also enhancing and generating awareness of Meridian's history. Additional objectives for these goals are described within the plan. • Meridian Rail-With-Trail Action Plan A portion of the project area includes Union Pacific right-of-way that is apart of the Boise cut-off. The Meridian Rail-With-Trail Action Plan identified an opportunity for a Treasure Valley-wide multi-use pathway. This Action Plan has since been supplemented with numerous planning efforts looking at more detailed cross-sections, street crossings, and alternatives. Meridian is actively working to construct certain portions, and part of this network must be constructed within the project area, either along the rail corridor right-of- way or integrated through site planning. • Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan One of the projects described in the proposed Union District Plan is the development of a community center as part of the Civic Block project. Objective 4.3 of the Meridian Parks and Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 81 of 265 7 Recreation Master Plan identifies expanded indoor recreation space as a priority for the community. Pathways are another significant element of this plan, and further emphasizes the demand for connectivity improvements to and through downtown, and the project area. • Meridian Pathways Master Plan The Pathways Master Plan identifies north-south (East 3rd Street) and east-west (Broadway/Rail with Trail)pathway connections through the project site. This plan works in concert with the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, Meridian Rail-With-Trail Action Plan, and through many of the policies in the Comprehensive Plan. • Downtown Meridian Transportation Management Plan This plan has resulted in significant roadway expansions within Meridian, including the split corridor phase I and phase 2 improvements. Two of the last projects left in the Downtown Meridian Transportation Management Plan are the East 3rd Street connection north of Carlton Ave and south of Badley Ave, and the extension of either Broadway Ave or Idaho Ave east to Commercial Ave (and ultimately to Locust Grove). These projects/connections are essential in supporting the densities necessary for the larger downtown area to be a thriving center of activity. The Union District Plan could benefit both of these streets in close proximity to the areas set for expansion. • Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan Developed by ACHD, this plan identified a number of community drive projects to enhance the pedestrian and bicycle connectivity in the area. ACHD has been diligent in programming and constructing these projects, and one of the last significant components is identified sidewalk improvements on East 3rd Street. There are sidewalk gaps in the project area and the rail crossing is unsafe and outright impassable for some with mobility disabilities. One of the projects in the Union District Plan would include street improvements to East 3rd Street near Broadway, and including the rail crossing. All of these plans are available on the City's Comprehensive Plan website at: https://meridiancily.org/plannin /g coMpplan/resources. Recommendation Based on the analysis provided in this memo, Staff believes establishing an Urban Renewal District Plan for the Union Block project to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and in the best interest of the City. Accordingly, Staff recommends that the Commission move to approve the two related Resolutions on the meeting agenda as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, VALIDATING CONFORMITY OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MERIDIAN REVITALIZATION PLAN WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, VALIDATING CONFORMITY OF THE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR THE UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 82 of 265 8 Attachment A: Union District Area (Urban Renewal District) Future Land Uses �Medium Density Residential nfhtu ? \ -Industrial -E STATE AVE Civic Old Town 1 0 Mixed Use Community ' E-PI� NE=AVE N = 0 F Z h N N Z W IDAHO AVEa MEL lu h � E IDAHO-AVE—Z - cHE o �F Z ? �I'll 1 F� ROM W W BROADWAY AVE Z ZEE BROADWAY AV� Lu � Q o � M w W Z W-RAILROA0.ST_Z W BOWER a E BOWER-ST - SO � E ADA Sr-r- Legend N 0 � W ti.:Urban Renewal District W TAYLOR AVE ®�Q� ParC61S -17 =_T 7-7 1� ® 'F_E KING-ST Railroad 500 H Feet Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020- Page 83 of 265 9 Attachment B: Related Policies The policies below are from the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. For policy type: G= Goal; O= Objective, and A=Action. Goals and Objectives are shown with referenced actions for additional context, along with a referenced section. ID Policy Policy Section Type 2.ff.W' G Plan for safe,attractive,and well-maintained neighborhoods that have Housing ample open space,and generous amenities that provide varied lifestyle choices. 2.02.01 O Elevate and enhance the quality and connectivity of residential site and Housing subdivision planning. 2.02.01E A Encourage the development of high quality,dense residential and mixed use Housing areas near in and around Downtown,near employment large shopping centers,public open spaces and parks,and along major transportation corridors,as shown on the Future Land Use Map. 2.02.02 O Maximize public services by prioritizing infill development of vacant and Housing underdeveloped parcels within the City over parcels on the fringe. 2.02.02B A Consider incentives such as density bonuses,reduced open space Housing requirements,and reduced fees for infill development in key areas near existing services. 2.02.02C A Support infill development that does not negatively impact the abutting, Housing existing development.Infill projects in Downtown should develop at higher densities,irrespective of existing development. A Apply appropriate design and construction standards to infill development in Ma- order to reduce adverse impacts to existing development. I 2.09.00 G Create positive,vibrant,and accessible commercial activity centers within Economic the community. Excellence 2.09.01 O Support redevelopment and infill opportunities Downtown. Economic Excellence 2.09.01B A Establish incentives to develop gathering spaces and civic facilities within Economic Downtown. Excellence =& ,Work towards mitigating and removing floodplain issues around Downtown. Economic Excellence 2.09.02 O Integrate and maintain quality public spaces throughout Downtown for Economic recreation,social,and civic activities. Excellence 2.09.02A A Actively implement action items in the Destination Downtown Plan. Economic Excellence 2.09.02B A Pursue grants and public-private partnerships to enhance Downtown. Economic Excellence 2.09.02C A Develop programs with local partners to expand art cultural,and Economic educational facilities in Downtown. ` Excellence 2.09.02D A Develop and support regular cultural activities and events Downtown,in Economic partnership with the Downtown Business Association and other Excellence organizations. ' A Support a compatible mix of land uses Downtown that activate the area= Economic during day and night. Excellence Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 84 of 265 10 ID Policy Policy Section Type 2.09.02G A Implement the City of Meridian Design Standards and City of Meridian Economic Architectural Standards Manual to ensure that Downtown remains the Excellence historic center for mixed-use tourism,business,retail,residential,and governmental activities. 2.09.03 O Cultivate unique and diverse destination-type activities within Meridian's Economic centers. Excellence 2.09.038 A Promote Ten Mile,Downtown,and The Village as centers of activity and Economic growth. Excellence 2.09.03E A Develop concept plans of potential destination activities and promote Economic appropriate development,infill,and redevelopment of activity centers. Excellence 3.03.00 G Direct and prioritize development in strategic areas and in accordance with Growth and corridor and special area plans. Population 3.03.01 O Plan for an appropriate land use mix,recreational and civic facilities,and Growth and phased service extension within specific area plans and urban renewal Population districts. 3.03.01E A Encourage infill development. Growth and Population 3.03.03G A Require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments,including Growth and curb and gutter,sidewalks, water and sewer utilities. Population 4.04.00 G Develop a connected,comfortable,and comprehensive network of multi- Parks and purpose pathways. Pathways 4.04.02 O Link pathways to important pedestrian generators,environmental features, Parks and historic landmarks,public facilities,Town Centers,and business districts. Pathways 4.04.02A A Identify opportunities for new paths that connect residential neighborhoods Parks and and community facilities,such as the library and city hall,parks,schools, Pathways athletic facilities,swimming pools,historic districts,the Downtown,as well as other commercial and retail activity centers in Meridian. 4.05.00 G Preserve,protect,enhance,and wisely use natural resources. Stewardship 4.05.01 O Protect and enhance existing waterways,groundwater,wetlands,wildlife Stewardship habitat,air,soils,and other natural resources. 4.05.01E A Assess environmental impact of potential new development,infill,and Stewardship redevelopment. 5.02.00 G Celebrate Meridian's historical,cultural,and agricultural heritage. Historic Preservation 5.02.01 O Enhance and restore the historical quality of Old Town. Historic Preservation 5.02.01A A Maintain and implement design and building standards for historically Historic significant buildings and resources in Old Town. Preservation 6.01.00 G Facilitate the efficient movement of people and products to and from the Transportation City. and Streets 6.01.01 O Support multi-modal and complete-street transportation improvements. Transportation and Streets 6.01.01C A Improve ingress and egress opportunities for all modes of transportation in Transportation Downtown. and Streets 6.01.02 O Enhance existing transportation systems. Transportation and Streets Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 85 of 265 1 1 Policy Policy Section Type 6.01.02D A Consider needed sidewalk,pathway,landscaping,and lighting improvements Transportation with all land use decisions. and Streets 6.01.021 A Pursue the extension of Idaho Ave. and/or Broadway Ave. to Commercial Dr. Transportation and the extension of East 3rd St.from Fairview Ave.to Pine Ave.in and Streets Downtown. 6.01.02L A Work with ACHD to implement projects from the 2012 Downtown Meridian Transportation Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan. and Streets Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 86 of 265 12 Attachment C: Meridian Pathways Master Plan Meridian Pathway Plan 1 1 1 1 �_ ......Alternative Route Q z -Existing Pathway E �Z✓ E-STATE AVE Street Route Pr --- Proposed Pathway RTT ETINE.AME H y H c = Z w w PT_7T z=z W IDAHO-AVE d y z E IDAHO-AVE M Z�z z o z W W BROADWAYAVE _T ' E BROADWAY AVE ... FG °C �. W W Z LNW MRA I LROAD ST - Z ••••......••••.......+ a ■ ti..............................................••• ED W BOWE ; E-BOWER-Si " J LLLJ z 21 � W F' 2• H �a `� 0 E ADA-ST—N Legend N z'� 6.;Urban Renewal District IN TAYLOR AVE Q� Parcels §-E KING } Railroad ® N 250 3 Peet Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 87 of 265 13 Attachment D: Downtown Meridian Street Cross-section Master Plan Examples Main Street MAIN STREET. Ada Street to Carlton Avenue I' IViewfacing North) D D Resign is based on caento Preservation a'.'a .�` al existing ROW.Maintain existing-66a along F9 Parking parallel parking. fi' Sidewalks F— Pathway ,f `� •� Fe Straetscaps Buffer f— Parkway Buffer vi Fe Furniture $P1ve 40— Lighting ✓Requlred,�Desirad � � t Ebatngedged ROW L Maintain existing curb lines L Maintain existing CL of road Existingedil ROW AD"'T with panelled parking(typ.) Lrien 26'to CL II Read� CLdRead _ 14'Ped°ntrian MAIN STREET intended to be consistent thematic elements,and must reconfiguration.Future improvements will generally be Ada Street to Carlton Avenue be carried forward appropriately as consistent entryway located behind the back ofcurb,and occur eitherthrough CONSIDERATIONS: thematic elements for the length of the corridor. private redevelopment and infill projects,orimprovements Cross-sactiun Width 80-fee(ROW) 80-feat DESCRIPTION oe ULTIMATE CONDITIONS: byMX and partner agencies.Driveways and unnecessary 2 Main between Ada and Carlton is a traditional downtown access points to Main should be restricted or removed Road Ihree area with Three lanes with center street lined predominately with olderbuildin sand some The significant Icalexistin (2013) withredevelo redevelopment, articular) near came,hrnlame torn lane p Y 9 Y 9 Yp 5 p particularly alleyways. infill redevelopment.Restaurants and professional services street cross-section is the potential for short center median Parkin Parallel/Angled(bothg sides) Parallel(both sides) arethe predominate types of existing uses,with some gov- islands.These islands are envisioned to occurwhere traf- ernmentservicesandanumberofhistoricstructures.The fic patterns will be minimally impacted,generally only Parking Capacity* NI 82 street is critical for north-south vehicular and pedestrian restricting alleys through -fall detached,pe 9 Y 9 9 Walkways(ea.side) 8-feet detached,min. connectivity,and is the primary arterial access for busi- built to provide additional aesthetic and thematic ben- caries ness and residential uses between Fairview and Franklin. efitsto the street environment.On-street parking should Buffer(ea.side) Vanes 8-feet per standards generally be parallel where it occurs,with angled parking Pathway None None INTENT` discouraged due to traffic and safety impacts,especially Bike Support None Sharrows The intent of this cross-section is to maintain and improve for bicycle users. *Parking impacts and future values are estimates.do not indicate interim connectivity,and balance the needs of both automotive conditions,and assume full compliance with cross section.Driveways,fire and pedestrian uses.Detached walkways and landscape IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: hydrants,and other conditions may alter final count.See Parking section buffers are the top priority,with on-street parking also Inmost cases the actual roadway for the Main Street cross- under Street Design. being critical.Street trees,Sig nage,pavers,and lighting are section is already built-out with little need for roadway DOWNTOWN MERIDIAN I CITY CORE STREET CROSS-SECTION MASTER PLAN STREET DESIGN Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 88 of 265 14 East 2nd Street EAST 2ND STREET: Broadway Avenue to Carlton Avenue ,= v {Wewfadng Narth} '__L g Beeip is based onebnma as fV o of existing BOW. r✓ Preservation ,Y., > � � < Fe Perking fra Sidewalks , r Pathway W . Streetacape Buffer F Parkway Buffer y id, Fe Furniture No Mae Lighting ✓Required.�0esired ,� � c a ExistngedgedRBW Existing edged BBW A° `T 21'to CL of Road 21'to CL of Road 19'Pedeairian Note:See tha appandfcu for aharnatire cane.section designs While cross-section configurations with increased parking IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: Broadway Avenue to Carlton Avenue are provided,in most conditions parking servicing local As a segment,the frequent cross-street and alley breaks CONSIDERATIONS: businesses should be consolidated off-street or located allow East 2nd to be developed more piecemeal than many Cross-seotic,Width 30-feet(ROW) 80-feat elsewhere,allowing fora more lively and dynamic pedes- other areas ofthe City Core.However,the curb-less nature East 2nd between Broadway and Carlton consists ofshort trian environment that increases area draw. of the identified cross-sections and resulting grade changes Read Two-way Two-way.cerh-lass block lengths with frequent cross-street and alley inter- DESCRIPTION OF ULTIMATE coN�moNs: with new facilities will likely require improvements to be Parking Angled and parallel Angled,parallel,and sections.The only through cross-street on this segment none made for the full width ofthe cross-section(both sides of Parking Capaei y' 79 57(may,a ) however is Pine,with all other streets dead-ending within East 2nd is intended to be a charming traditional down- the road).It may be possible for redevelopment to occur traffic movement and pctivity is rovides ovides additional o ry to heavy town opportunities diningsex eriences throu that is able gh h cater unique design ng in half-block increments between across-street and alley, Attetached or hollard Walkways(ea.side) and missing asegments. sBeperated,width raria ppp P g q g but there is likely greater long term cost-savings to do a 54e0 or It. neat min. for pedestrian supportive focus and enhancement, and comfortable pedestrian spaces.While trees are kept whole block at a time.Storm-water is an important con- to provide a more pedestrian scaled and comfortable sideration.Improvements should occur as public-private Buffer(ea,side) Varies Varies. in IB'where INTENT: pedestrian environment,the are pulled further from the p p p e.i sts with wal way p y P raisepart awareness, generate be supposter rtive ofater place-businmaking, Pathway None None This street segment is unique in that the short block lengths buildings to allow for more unobstructed business and raise awareness,and be supportive of new businesses or and limited traffic allow for multiple cross-sections,which community streetscape uses,such as outdoor dining. renovations able to make use ofthefacilities. Bike Support None None while consistent in thematic and alignment,offer a vari- Cross-section options exist for medians or other special `Parking impacts and future values are estimates,do not indicate Interim ety of configurations.Priority improvements should be street features such as topiary or artwork.See appendix. conditions,and assume full compliance.with cross section.Ormeways.fire focused on a wider pedestrian environmentwith emphasis hydrants.and other conditions may alter final count.sea Parking section on unique and memorable place-making configurations. under Street Design. DOWNTOWN MERIDIAN I UTy CORE STREET CROSS-SECTION MASTER PLAN STREET DESIGN Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 89 of 265 15 East 3rd Street EAST 3FV STREET: Franklin Road to Broadway Avenue {View Facing North} so to t Design is based an eastern edge of r✓ 8. existing ROW,but may vary if is- Preservation instant for continuous segments Parking V Sidewalks AO° - �� Cnaaon Ave Pathway f� 3 le Streetacape Buffer s Parkway Buffer -� y v r'Ne ve F_ Furniture lighting ✓Required. Desired a a a Eristieg edge of RDW Aoa sT 27Pdestrian IR'to Etuati CL of Read(varies) M��I t INTENT: ample buffers for the detached pathways and sidewalks Franklin Road.BroadwoyAvenue The primary intent of this cross-section and any varia- are all important safety and aesthetic elements for the CONSIDERATIONS: tion is to provide for safe and convenient north-south long-term health ofthe neighborhoods.Bulbouts should Cres-notionWidth 90-fact(ROW) 76-feat pedestrian connectivity between Franklin and downtown. be developed at street corners to further enhance safety East 3rd between Franklin and Broadway is predominately The required ten-foot detached pathway must be on the and provide additional opportunities for landscaping and Road Two-way iwo-way residential in nature,but is entirelywithin the Transit Ori- west-side of the road,which has fewer driveway conflicts additional district thematic elements. Parking Parallel Parallel ented and Cultural district(TOD).Improvements should be and opportunities for further reductions with redevelop- IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: ParkingCapasity' Vary 51 supportive of higher density and transit supportive uses in ment taking access from alleyways.Walkways must be Walkways Varies,4 to 5-feet, Oetachad.6-feet min. ultimate conditions,and all efforts should be made with detached,and residential appropriate lighting provided Though implementation may occurwith fragmented parcel fragmantad gaps (east side) redevelopment to provide for additional enhancements to enhance safety.On-street parking should be provided, specific redevelopment,it is assumed that implementation Beffer(se.side) Varies a-footlandscapehuffac which capitalize on these future services.Alleyways are but angled and perpendicular configurations are heavily of the pathway will require concerted efforts on behalf . another important consideration with the corridor,and discouraged to ensure continuity of the pathway and to of MDC and City.The pathway is critical for accessibility, Pathway No yes.111-fast min.(west must be adequately signed and enforced to ensure pedes- reduce back-out conflicts with through traffic. safety,and quality of life,and should be implemented in side) trian safety along the corridor.While alley use is already blocks and segments.Interim redevelopment enhance- Biko Support No Sharrows predominately one-way forwestbound travel,this should DESCRIPTION OF ULTIMATE CONDITIONS: ments may not require full improvements if MDC and "parkingimpactsand future valuesareesFimates.de oat lndicateinterim be verified and coordinated with impacted stakeholders, While East 3rd is not intended to serve as an entryway the City are not able to expand and maintain pathway conditions,and assumefull compliance with cross section,Driveways,fire by and considered for access with redevelopment. corridor,it is important for connectivity into the down- components,but redevelopment must make allowances drants,and other conditions may alter final count.See Parking action undar town area and should be inviting.Tree lined streets with forfuture installation. Street Casio, wA Aw "�i) DOWNTOWN MERIDIAN I UTy CORE STREET CROSS-SECTION MASTER PLAN STREET DES I6N ®' Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 90 of 265 16 R, T)ST' Broadway Avenue to Carlton Avenue ., View Faaingnorlh} D D Design is based on eas ern edge d E a psingR0W,6utmayraryifcan- G7 Preservation as a 'ti sistem larcentinames segments Fe Parking e = fiY Sidewalks 144— Pathway !p Cf• 3 JGp /Y Streetscape Buffer Parkway Buffer •� y •� y .{ F Furniture Lighting 'E ✓Requi red,•Dasi red m 'R ea �1 r,minas a - - a Existing saga of Raw _. T 37Pedealrim ITta Edging CL d Dowd ivariea Pedestrian tion south of the tracks,and to help improve pedestrian and provide additional opportunities for landscaping and Broadway Avenue to Carlton Avenue connectivity with urban uses to the west.Walkways must additional district thematic elements. CONSIDERATIONS: be detached by landscape buffers with large canopy trees,and residential appropriate lighting must be provided to IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: Cross-saceonwidth SD-feet(RDW) 76-feat Though East 3rd between Broadway and Carlton is pre- enhance safety.On-street parking should be provided, Though implementation mayoccurwith fragmented parcel Road Two-way Two-way dominately residential in nature,it is adjacent to three but angled and perpendicular configurations are heavily specific redevelopment,it is assumed that implementa- Parking Parallel Parallel different commercial districts including the Northern discouraged to ensure continuity ofthe pathway and to tion of the pathwaywill require more concerted efforts Parking Capacity* 63 64 Gateway,Washington&Main,and Traditional City Core reduce back-out conflicts with through traffic.All rede- on behalf of MDC and the City.Interim redevelopment Walkways Attached 4 to 5-feat. Detached.6-feat min. districts.While efforts should be made to enhance district velopment must be considerate to and supportive of the enhancements may not require full improvements if the fragmented gaps (east side) identities,with the proximity to the commercial districts, residential nature of this corridor segment. City is not able to expand and maintain pathway com- 8-foot landscape buffer opportunities existto blend boundaries for uses supportive ponents,but redevelopment must make allowances for Buffer(ea.side) Varies min. of the overall Destination Downtown vision plan, DESCRIPTION OF ULTIMATE CONDITIONS: future installation. Pathway No Yes.IB-feet min,(west While East 3rd is not intended to serve as an entryway side) INTENT` corridor,it is importantfor connectivity into the downtown Bike Support No Star— The primary intent ofthis cross-section and anyvariation is area and should be inviting.The tree lined streets with *Parking impaots and future values are estimates,do not indicate interim to provide for a safe and convenient north-south pathway ample buffers for the detached pathways and sidewalks conditions,and assonsfull compliance with cross section Driveways,fire hy- connection between Carlton and Broadway.The required are all important safety and aesthetic elements for the drants.and other conditions may altar final count.See Parking section under ten-foot detached pathway In ust be on the west-side ofthe long-term health ofthe neighborhoods.Bulb-outs should Street Design. road to maintain alignment with the pathway configura- be developed at street corners to further enhance safety DOWNTOWN MERIDIAN I CITY CORE STREET CROSS-SECTION MASTER PLAN STREET DESIGN M1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 91 of 265 17 Broadway Ave BROADWAYAVENUE: Main Street to East 2nd Street [Yew Facing East} Design is hosed on NOW along f✓ Preservation '•,,ye a northern edge IS Parking e IS Jorm" Sidewalks - 's / _ -� �''> 'naaon Ave li Pathway f fyv no W Streetscape Buffer .0 f— Parkway Buffer 1I - 17 N r E E Furniture u t lighting -A ✓Required. Desired 'q a Existingedgeof ROW S'Pudeddat Yin Edsting CL of Road(vane;. 22'Pedestrian I should reflect this.While the ten-foot multi-use pathway alignments across intersections,and to reduce setback Main Streetto Eost2nd Street is required on the south-side of the street,it's possible impactsto neighboring properties and buildings. MOP that future pathway connectivity may be integrated with CONSIDERATIONS: redevelopment,and the pathway pulled within the adja- IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: Crass-section Width 79-fast(ROW) 84.5-feet Broadway between Main and East 2nd is generally indus- cent property.On-street parking and standard streetscape Curb line changes necessaryto be supportive of pedestrian Road Two-way Two-way trial storage on the southern side of the roadway,along to improvements are required,and must align and integrate activities and allow businesses greater street presence will Parking Angled Parallel the railroad tracks,and dominated by older buildings in with improvements to the east and west. likely require improvements to occur for the full length Parking Capaaity' 31 ID disrepair on the northern side.Sidewalk facilities are also in of the block,on one or both sides of the roadway.Unless Detached.4 to 5-fast disrepair,and non-existent on the south.The streetscape DESCRIPTION OF ULTIMATE CONDITIONS: large Scale redevelopment occurs,public participation will Walkways(ea.side) north side.none on Detached.5-feat(min.) on the north-side of Broadway has been redeveloped on The north-side of this cross-section includes standard be necessary for implementation and play a large role in south aide. the corridor segments both to the west and east—only required streetscape improvements,and a wider walkway redevelopment of the streetscape,particularly with the Buffer(ea.side) Vsrlaa 8-feet por standards this segment is lacking improvements. consistent with other corridor improvements to the east. muki-use pathway.With eventual removal of existing angled Pathway None Pas The south-side of the street provides the required path- parking,it is expected that additional off-street surface or Bike Support Nona None INTENT: way connection,but may simply mirror improvements on garage parking will need to be provided elsewhere to offset Future improvements will need to support mixed use the north-side,or'ust meet streetscape standards if the loss and accommodate future downtown parking needs. 'Parking mpd—urrefullacts and future compliance with Grosestimates,do not indmetas,fiinterim P PP J P P 9 nonainons,and aasumefull compliance with arose section.Driveways,fire hy- development and balance the pedestrian environment with pathway is integrated into future development through the Improvements on the north-side of the roadway should drants.and other conditions may alter final count.See Parking section under parking provisions.It is expected that future redevelop- southern properties.Parallel parking is provided instead be a focusto compliment Idaho and increase demand for Street Design. merit on both sides of the road will be transit supportive of angled to enhance safety and create a more pedestrian land to the south. higher density m ixed uses,and the pedestrian environment friendly corridor,and to In it wider cross-sections,maintain DOWNTOWN MERIDIAN CITY CORE STREET CROSS-SECTION MASTER PLAN Sl REEI"DESIGN Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 92 of 265 18 E IDIAN IDAHO 10morw PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING Agenda Item Number: 4 B Item Title: Resolution PZ-20-01: Validating Conformity of the Frist Amendment to the Meridian Revitalization Plan with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Meeting Notes: CiWE I� ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item -4.13. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item - Resolution No PZ-20-01.A Resolution of the Planning and Zoning Commission for the City of Meridian, Idaho, Validating Conformity of the First Amendment to the Meridian Revitalization Plan with the City of Meridian's Comprehensive Plan ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Upload Date P & Z Resolution 20-01 with attachments Resolution 4/9/2020 MDC Resolution 20-008 for Plan Amendment Backup Material 4/9/2020 Exhibit A.1 to Resolution PZ-20-01 Exhibit 4/10/2020 Downtown District Deannexation Plan Backup Material 4/9/2020 Attachment 1 A to Deannexation Plan Backup Material 4/9/2020 Attachment 2A to Deannexation Plan Backup Material 4/9/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 93 of 265 RESOLUTION PZ-20-01 CITY OF MERIDIAN BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO,VALIDATING CONFORMITY OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MERIDIAN REVITALIZATION PLAN WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Meridian(the "City"), Idaho, also known as Meridian Development Corporation, the duly constituted and authorized urban renewal agency of the City of Meridian, Idaho (hereinafter"MDC") has submitted the proposed First Amendment to the Meridian Revitalization Plan(the "First Amendment")to the City; WHEREAS, the Mayor and Meridian City Council referred the First Amendment to the City Planning and Zoning Commission for review and recommendations concerning the conformity of said First Amendment with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended(the "Comprehensive Plan"); and WHEREAS, on April 16, 2020, the City Planning and Zoning Commission met to consider whether the First Amendment conforms with the Comprehensive Plan as required by Idaho Code § 50-2008(b); and WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed said First Amendment in view of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that the First Amendment is in all respects in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That the First Amendment, submitted by MDC and referred to this Commission by the Mayor and City Council for review, is in all respects in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Section 2. That Exhibits A.1 and A.2 outlining the findings supporting the determination that the First Amendment is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, are hereby adopted and incorporated as part of this Resolution. Section 3. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to provide the Mayor and Meridian City Council with a signed copy of this Resolution relating to said Union District Plan. RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION VALIDATING CONFORMITY OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MERIDIAN REVITALIZATION PLAN WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN-1 of 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 94 of 265 Section 4. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 16th day of April 2020. APPROVED: ATTEST: Chair, Planning and Zoning Commission City Clerk RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION VALIDATING CONFORMITY OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MERIDIAN REVITALIZATION PLAN WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN-2 of 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 95 of 265 Mayor Robert E. Simison E LDA City Council Members: I MAN Treg Bernt Brad Hoaglun Joe Borton Jessica Perreault H a Luke Cavener Liz Strader EXHIBIT A.1 TO RESOLUTION PZ-20-01 TO: Meridian Planning &Zoning Commission DATE: April 9, 2020 FROM: Ted Baird, Deputy City Attorney RE: First Amendment to the Meridian Revitalization Plan The first of two Resolutions before you is to recommend an amendment to the existing Meridian Revitalization Plan to de-annex certain land from that Plan so that it can be included in the proposed Union District Plan. As background, the 16 acres for the proposed Union District Plan are currently within the boundaries of the Meridian Revitalization Plan(the "Downtown District Plan"), which terminates on December 31, 2026. Idaho Code does not allow a parcel to be within the boundaries of two urban renewal districts, therefore, the parcels currently in the Downtown District Plan must be de-annexed pursuant to a plan amendment. The de-annexed area has the same boundaries as the proposed Union District Plan. RECOMMENDATION: As the First Amendment represents a de-annexation of lands within the existing Downtown District Plan and does not add any land are to the Downtown District Plan or change any land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the proposed First Amendment maintains consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. For additional information and findings,please refer to the April 8, 2020 Planning Division Memorandum. EXHIBIT A.1 TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-01 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 96 of 265 Mayor Robert E. Simison E IDIAN :�- City Council Members: Treg Bernt Brad Hoaglun Joe Borton Jessica Perreault H t Luke Cavener Liz Strader EXHIBIT A.2 TO RESOLUTION PZ-20-01 April 9, 2020 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Robert Simison Meridian City Council Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission CC: David Miles, Chief of Staff Cameron Arial, Community Development Director Victoria Cleary, Economic Development Administrator Caleb Hood, Planning Division Manager FROM: Caleb Hood, Planning Division Manager Brian McClure, Comprehensive Associate Planner RE: Urban Renewal Plan for the Union District Urban Renewal Project This memo is intended to provide Comprehensive Plan related analysis for the proposed Urban Renewal Plan for the Union District Urban Renewal Project(Union District Plan) in downtown Meridian. Due to the current COVID-19 outbreak and associated quarantine, Staff is including analysis within this memo that otherwise would be shared and explained during the meeting. City Staff will be in virtual attendance at the April 16th Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to give a brief report and summary and to answer any questions, but does not intend to get into many details; this memo should be relied on heavily for Staff s analysis. Application of the City's Comprehensive Plan(Plan)to the proposed Union District area(see Attachment A) is very relevant. Every major theme (chapter) in the Plan ranging from economic development and land use to historic preservation and transportation contain policies that are directly applicable. Additionally, the Comprehensive Plan adopts other documents by reference, for inclusion in consideration of land use decisions and to direct staff activities. Many of the referenced documents are relevant both in geographic area and to the described implementation strategies and goals in the Union District Plan. The following analysis describes the associated text, policies, and referenced plans. EXHIBIT A.2 TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-01 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 97 of 265 Analysis Plan Text The implementation strategies and goals stated in the Union District Plan clearly describe activities aimed at stimulating private development through the reduction of blight and the construction or community improvements. Some of the listed activities include: design and construction of infrastructure improvements; acquisition or support in rehabilitation of real property; financial assistance for business; advanced funding for development; and public- private partnership in the construction of a new Community Center. See pages 3-4 and 9-10 of the plan for how the goals of the plan will be achieved. The Evolving Community section (Chapter 3) of the City's Comprehensive Plan, defines future land use typologies. The description for Old Town, the adopted future land use in and around the project area, states: This designation includes the historic downtown and the true community center. The boundary of the Old Town district predominantly follows Meridian's historic plat boundaries. In several areas, both sides of a street were incorporated into the boundary to encourage similar uses and complimentary design of the facing houses and buildings. Sample uses include offices, retail and lodging, theatres, restaurants, and service retail for surrounding residents and visitors. A variety of residential uses are also envisioned and could include reuse of existing buildings, new construction of multi family residential over ground floor retail or office uses. The City has developed specific architectural standards for Old Town and other traditional neighborhood areas. Pedestrian amenities are emphasized in Old Town via streetscape standards. Additional public and quasi public amenities and outdoor gathering area are encouraged. Future planning in Old Town will be reviewed in accordance with Destination Downtown, a visioning document for redevelopment in Downtown Meridian. Please see Chapter 2 Premier Community for more information on Destination Downtown. Sample zoning include O-T. The Old Town future land use designation is the most diverse in the City's land use portfolio, with the greatest combined range of residential and non-residential uses and no caps on density or intensity of developed uses. Further, the City's complimentary zoning, also named Old Town (O-T), has zero setbacks for structures, relaxed parking requirements, and reduced landscape setbacks (aside from pedestrian streetscape infrastructure.) Interestingly, the Union District Plan makes numerous references to the City's planning documents dictating density and character elements,but it is Destination Downtown, developed by the Meridian Development Corporation(MDC), that dictates general uses, building mass and character, and intensity of developments. The City has adopted Destination Downtown by reference, and supports MDC's plan by adopting an eclectic and flexible future land use and zoning designation. With Destination Downtown nearing a decade of use however, existing conditions varying in several significant areas, many new stakeholders and community groups, and with the downtown urban renewal district expiring in the upcoming years, it is likely the plan is nearing the end of its relevancy. Plan Policies The following text relates to the policies found throughout the major themes in the Comprehensive Plan(Chapters 2 through 6). Not all policies must be addressed or apply to the Union District Plan, but staff has tried to include all downtown related policies below. Additional context for these policies can be found in the Related Policies section(see Attachment B), which EXHIBIT A.2 TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-01 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 98 of 265 includes parent Goals and Objectives, for the referenced policies. Note: the first number of a policy references the Chapter in which the policy can be found. • 2.02.01E, Encourage the development of high quality, dense residential and mixed use areas near in and around Downtown, near employment, large shopping centers,public open spaces and parks, and along major transportation corridors, as shown on the Future Land Use Map. A new urban renewal district focused on infrastructure (parking, utilities, etc.)would provide the tools necessary to support and encourage redevelopment in an area of town that suffers from significant blight. • 2.02.02B, Consider incentives such as density bonuses, reduced open space requirements, and reduced fees for infill development in key areas near existing services. A new urban renewal district could provide for incentives such as infrastructure and infrastructure reimbursement through tax increment financing (TIF). • 2.02.02C, Support infill development that does not negatively impact the abutting, existing development. Infill projects in Downtown should develop at higher densities, irrespective of existing development. The Union District Plan does not address how transitions between existing and proposed redevelopment may take place, but could do so transparently as part of negotiations for partnerships with the Urban Renewal District, and through public hearing and administrative approvals with the City. Staff will review future projects for consistency with this policy. The Union District Plan addresses density increases throughout the document. • 2.02.02D, Apply appropriate design and construction standards to infill development in order to reduce adverse impacts to existing development. The Union District Plan makes specific references to establishing performance criteria and design standards in goal `i'(page 4), and duplicated under implementation letter `w' (page 11). They state: In conjunction with the City, the establishment and implementation of performance criteria to assure high site design standards and environmental quality and other design elements which provide unity and integrity to the entire Project Area, including commitment of funds for planning studies, achieving high standards of development, and leveraging such development to achieve public objectives and efficient use of scarce resources. This is critical work to be done proactively, as the City does not have any site or building design standards specific to Downtown (just general traditional neighborhood design), or for policies related to historic preservation and enhancements. NOTE:Development of design standards downtown has not been preliminarily identified as a high priority project for the City. • 2.09.01 B, Establish incentives to develop gathering spaces and civic facilities within Downtown. A new urban renewal district could provide for incentives such as gathering spaces and civic facilities, which could be reimbursed through tax increment financing(TIF). Part of the Union District Plan specifically references a public private partnership, including the City, for the construction of a community center. • 2.09.01 C, Work towards mitigating and removing floodplain issues around Downtown. There is no floodplain in this area of Downtown. EXHIBIT A.2 TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-01 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 99 of 265 • 2.09.02A, Actively implement action items in the Destination Downtown Plan. Destination Downtown was created by the Meridian Development Corporation for the downtown Urban Renewal District, and adopted by the City. This plan was extremely broad in land use diversity, area, and scope. The project area for the Union District Plan is included within the Destination Downtown area, but previous efforts failed to eliminate blight that this new district seeks to address. With the existing downtown urban renewal set to expire in the coming years, this new district is an opportunity for more renewed and focused efforts, both geographically and in implementation activities. • 2.O9.02B, Pursue grants and public-private partnerships to enhance Downtown. A new urban renewal district could both provide grants and make more competitive applications for grants, by utilizing a dedicated funding source such as tax increment financing(TIF). • 2.09.02C, Develop programs with local partners to expand art, cultural, and educational facilities in Downtown. There are several references to these activities and facilities throughout the Union District Plan. Art may be done both as public private partnership, or independent of development, and educational facilities are described in several areas including implementation strategies (letter `o). It should be noted that the Union District Plan describes the Urban Renewal District's ability to make decisions related to public art independent of the Meridian Arts Commission, which to date has focused a great deal of time, money, and energy in downtown. Staff recommends caution with multiple independent entities exercising self determination of overlapping activities. • 2.09.02D, Develop and support regular cultural activities and events Downtown, in partnership with the Downtown Business Association and other organizations. Supporting events is not described within the Union District Plan directly, but supporting the development of locations for these to occur is addressed. • 2.09.02F, Support a compatible mix of land uses Downtown that activate the area during day and night. Supporting specific uses at discrete times of the day is not described within the Union District Plan directly, but supporting the development of mixed-use locations,facilities, and supporting infrastructure (e.g. —parking) is discussed. • 2.09.02G, Implement the City of Meridian Design Standards and City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual to ensure that Downtown remains the historic center for mixed-use tourism, business, retail, residential, and governmental activities. The City has land use authority over the project area and implementation of design and architectural standards must be met. However, these standards, while allowing for these types of uses/attractions, does not necessarily cater to or encourage them. Additional work is necessary if downtown specific and historical context is desired. The Union District Plan speaks to this work under goal `i'(page 4), and duplicated under implementation letter `w' (page 11). • 2.09.03B, Promote Ten Mile, Downtown, and The Village as centers of activity and growth. The Union District Plan seeks to redevelop some of the most blighted property in the City, at the heart and center of the Downtown area, and which is otherwise adjacent to some of the most iconic and well used public spaces outside of traditional parks. By successfully EXHIBIT A.2 TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-01 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 100 of 265 redeveloping this highly visible blight, Downtown will be well placed to offer and promote a dense concentration ofpublic spaces for activity use by many. • 2.09.03E, Develop concept plans of potential destination activities and promote appropriate development, infill, and redevelopment of activity centers. The Union District Plan does not address this directly, but the intention of the Plan is to support these types of activities through public private partnerships of community facilities. • 3.03.01E, Encourage infill development. The unstated purpose of the Union District Plan, through virtually all of the goals and implementation strategies, is to encourage infill development through redevelopment of blighted lands and development of community facilities through public private partnerships. • 3.03.03G, Require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks, water and sewer utilities. The City has land use authority over the project area and urban infrastructure will be required with all redevelopment. Further, the Union District Plan calls out specific implementation strategies including road, curb, gutter, streetscape, lighting, stormwater, and others throughout the document(including financial analysis). • 4.04.02A, Identify opportunities for new paths that connect residential neighborhoods and community facilities, such as the library and city hall,parks, schools, athletic facilities, swimming pools, historic districts, the Downtown, as well as other commercial and retail activity centers in Meridian. The City's Pathway Master Plan depicts several options through the project area, and will be required as part of redevelopment of the site. The Union District Plan references pathways both through goals and implementation items. • 4.05.01E, Assess environmental impact of potential new development, infill, and redevelopment. The Union District Plan specifically addresses environmental assessment of brownfield sites, and more generally towards environmental quality and creating standards to maintain environmental quality in coordination with the City (goal letter `i). Outside of floodplain impacts however, the City does not have much in the way of requirements or regulations to this end. • 5.02.01A, Maintain and implement design and building standards for historically significant buildings and resources in Old Town. There are no historically significant structures within the project area. The Union District Plan emphasizes consideration for the historic character and quality of the area. Stronger efforts by designers to this end are needed, or standards created, to protect and enhance the general area prior to design and permit approval for structures in this area, if this policy statement is a priority. It would be difficult to suggest that preliminary concepts for structures on either the Civic Block or Union Pacific property compliment or lend aid to any historic themes in the Old Town area. The bulk and mass of concept buildings could easily overwhelm and minimize other historic structures in the area without further integration of ideas and themes. EXHIBIT A.2 TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-01 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 101 of 265 • 6.01.01 C, Improve ingress and egress opportunities for all modes of transportation in Downtown. The Union District Plan references improvements to roads, sidewalks,pathways, and a railroad crossing, as projects for implementation. Improvements to East 3rd Street specifically would greatly enhance bicycle access into downtown, and provide more options for local residents and stakeholders. • 6.01.02D, Consider needed sidewalk, pathway, landscaping, and lighting improvements with all land use decisions. The City has land use authority over the project area and redevelopment will be required to provide infrastructure. The Union District Plan also specifically references all of these elements as projects for implementation. • 6.01.02I, Pursue the extension of Idaho Ave. and/or Broadway Ave. to Commercial Dr. and the extension of East 3rd St. from Fairview Ave. to Pine Ave. in Downtown. While not directly referencing the extension of these streets,proposed implementation (improvement)projects for both Broadway Ave and East 3rd Street would go a long way in highlighting the value of these projects and encouraging their construction. • 6.01.02L, Work with ACHD to implement projects from the 2012 Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan. While not directly referencing coordination with ACHD on implementation of the 2012 Neighborhood Plan, improvements to East 3rd Street are directly aligned and much needed for north-south bicycle connectivity through Downtown. Neither Meridian Road nor Main Street have dedicated bike facilities, and a safe multi-modal, north-south connection is needed between existing pathway connection on Franklin near Storey Park, and on Pine near Five Mile Creek. EXHIBIT A.2 TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-01 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 102 of 265 Referenced Plans The following plans are adopted by reference in the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan, and are relevant material to the proposed Union District Plan. • Downtown Meridian Street Cross-section Master Plan Every road within the project area is included within the Downtown Meridian Street Cross- section Master Plan. Adopted in 2014, this document includes cross-section concepts intended to work with minimal impact to available impact, while also serving multiple modes. Vibrant streetscape activity is especially important in the Old Town area, and including the Union District Project area. Connectivity both east-west and north-south through the downtown area is very important. It is particularly important that East 3rd Street incorporate a pathway element to support connectivity of the City's Pathway Master Plan through downtown, connecting Storey Park to Fairview Avenue. Traffic speeds on Meridian Road are unfriendly to pedestrian, and neither Meridian Road nor Main Street provide safe bicycle connectivity north-south, and there is no other railroad crossing within the downtown area besides East 3Yd Street. • Historic Preservation Plan The Historic Preservation Commission and City adopted this plan in 2014. With less than 2.2% of Meridian's housing stock being older than 1960's construction (2017 Existing Conditions Report), and almost all of it consolidated in the Downtown area, there is very limited opportunity for historic preservation outside of agricultural themes in the larger community. Several goals from this plan are relevant to the Union District Plan, including: o Goal I Preserve and enhance Meridian's historical, cultural and agricultural heritage. o Goal 3 Heighten public awareness of historic preservation in the community and improve preservation education efforts for various audiences. o Goal 4 Maintain and strengthen support for historic preservation from individuals, commercial property owners, local organizations and neighborhood groups. These goals for the Commission (and City) are not just about preserving, but also enhancing and generating awareness of Meridian's history. Additional objectives for these goals are described within the plan. • Meridian Rail-With-Trail Action Plan A portion of the project area includes Union Pacific right-of-way that is apart of the Boise cut-off. The Meridian Rail-With-Trail Action Plan identified an opportunity for a Treasure Valley-wide multi-use pathway. This Action Plan has since been supplemented with numerous planning efforts looking at more detailed cross-sections, street crossings, and alternatives. Meridian is actively working to construct certain portions, and part of this network must be constructed within the project area, either along the rail corridor right-of- way or integrated through site planning. EXHIBIT A.2 TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-01 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 103 of 265 • Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan One of the projects described in the proposed Union District Plan is the development of a community center as part of the Civic Block project. Objective 4.3 of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan identifies expanded indoor recreation space as a priority for the community. Pathways are another significant element of this plan, and further emphasizes the demand for connectivity improvements to and through downtown, and the project area. • Meridian Pathways Master Plan The Pathways Master Plan identifies north-south (East 3rd Street) and east-west (Broadway/Rail with Trail)pathway connections through the project site. This plan works in concert with the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, Meridian Rail-With-Trail Action Plan, and through many of the policies in the Comprehensive Plan. • Downtown Meridian Transportation Management Plan This plan has resulted in significant roadway expansions within Meridian, including the split corridor phase I and phase 2 improvements. Two of the last projects left in the Downtown Meridian Transportation Management Plan are the East 3rd Street connection north of Carlton Ave and south of Badley Ave, and the extension of either Broadway Ave or Idaho Ave east to Commercial Ave (and ultimately to Locust Grove). These projects/connections are essential in supporting the densities necessary for the larger downtown area to be a thriving center of activity. The Union District Plan could benefit both of these streets in close proximity to the areas set for expansion. • Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan Developed by ACHD, this plan identified a number of community drive projects to enhance the pedestrian and bicycle connectivity in the area. ACHD has been diligent in programming and constructing these projects, and one of the last significant components is identified sidewalk improvements on East 3rd Street. There are sidewalk gaps in the project area and the rail crossing is unsafe and outright impassable for some with mobility disabilities. One of the projects in the Union District Plan would include street improvements to East 3rd Street near Broadway, and including the rail crossing. All of these plans are available on the City's Comprehensive Plan website at: hops://meridiancity.ora/plannin /e compplan/resources. Recommendation Based on the analysis provided in this memo, Staff believes establishing an Urban Renewal District Plan for the Union Block project to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and in the best interest of the City. Accordingly, Staff recommends that the Commission move to approve the two related Resolutions on the meeting agenda as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO,VALIDATING CONFORMITY OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MERIDIAN REVITALIZATION PLAN WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO,VALIDATING CONFORMITY OF THE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR THE UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EXHIBIT A.2 TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-01 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 104 of 265 Attachment A: Union District Area (Urban Renewal District) Future Land Usesr-E Medium Density ResidentialIndustrialCivic Old Town1 0 Mixed Use Community E�PIf NE_AVE� 0 0 y N S ]R�N Z W N N ~ }Z ��W�Z W IDAHO AVE N E IDAHOAVE—Z //� N ��luz-HE W BROADWA�Y-AVE-AVE'M��� � W iz W ZBROADWAY AVE-OAD_S \/{�\�p[1.� a W^RAILRT_Z i W_BO.WER:ST Z �3 E BOVIIER-ST � W=W Q � OT0 i� E DA-Sr-N Legend N T T VI; Z�I I 1 5,:Urban Renewal District W-TAYLOR AVE- T R 0 Parcels _T] *_E KING ST - Railroad ® I N 00 0�Feet EXHIBIT A.2 TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-01 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020- Page 105 of 265 Attachment B: Related Policies The policies below are from the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. For policy type: G=Goal; O=Objective, and A=Action. Goals and Objectives are shown with referenced actions for additional context,along with a referenced section. ID Policy Policy Section Type JIL G Plan for safe,attractive,and well-maintained neighborhoods that have Housing El ample open space,and generous amenities that provide varied lifestyle choices. 2.02.01 O Elevate and enhance the quality and connectivity of residential site and Housing subdivision planning. 2.02.01E A Encourage the development of high quality,dense residential and mixed use Housing areas near in and around Downtown,near employment large shopping centers,public open spaces and parks,and along major transportation corridors,as shown on the Future Land Use Map. 2.02.02 O Maximize public services by prioritizing infill development of vacant and Housing underdeveloped parcels within the City over parcels on the fringe. 2.02.02B A Consider incentives such as density bonuses,reduced open space Housing requirements,and reduced fees for infill development in key areas near existing services. 2.02.02C A Support infill development that does not negatively impact the abutting, Housing existing development. Infill projects in Downtown should develop at higher densities,irrespective of existing development. 2.02.02D A Apply appropriate design and construction standards to infill development in Housing order to reduce adverse impacts to existing development. 2.09.00 G Create positive,vibrant,and accessible commercial activity centers within Economic the community. Excellence 2.09.01 O Support redevelopment and infill opportunities Downtown. Economic Excellence 2.09.01B A Establish incentives to develop gathering spaces and civic facilities within Economic Downtown. Excellence 2.09.01C A Work towards mitigating and removing floodplain issues around Downtown. Economic Excellence 2.09.02 O Integrate and maintain quality public spaces throughout Downtown for Economic recreation,social,and civic activities. Excellence 2.09.02A A Actively implement action items in the Destination Downtown Plan. Economic Excellence 2.09.02B A Pursue grants and public-private partnerships to enhance Downtown. Economic Excellence 2.09.02C A Develop programs with local partners to expand art cultural,and Economic educational facilities in Downtown. Excellence 2.09.02D A Develop and support regular cultural activities and events Downtown,in Economic partnership with the Downtown Business Association and other Excellence organizations. 2.09.02F A Support a compatible mix of land uses Downtown that activate the area Economic during day and night. Excellence 2.09.02G A Implement the City of Meridian Design Standards and City of Meridian Economic Architectural Standards Manual to ensure that Downtown remains the Excellence historic center for mixed-use tourism,business,retail,residential,and EXHIBIT A.2 TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-01 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 106 of 265 governmental activities. 2.09.03 O Cultivate unique and diverse destination-type activities within Meridian's Economic centers. Excellence 2.09.03E A Promote Ten Mile,Downtown,and The Village as centers of activity and Economic growth. Excellence 2.09.03E A Develop concept plans of potential destination activities and promote Economic appropriate development,infill,and redevelopment of activity centers. Excellence 3.03.00 G Direct and prioritize development in strategic areas and in accordance with Growth and corridor and special area plans. Population 3.03.01 O Plan for an appropriate land use mix,recreational and civic facilities,and Growth and phased service extension within specific area plans and urban renewal Population districts. 3.03.01E A Encourage infill development. Growth and Population 3.03.03G A Require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments,including Growth and curb and gutter,sidewalks, water and sewer utilities. Population 4.04.00 G Develop a connected,comfortable,and comprehensive network of multi- Parks and purpose pathways. Pathways 4.04.02 0 Link pathways to important pedestrian generators,environmental features, Parks and historic landmarks,public facilities,Town Centers,and business districts. Pathways 4.04.02A A Identify opportunities for new paths that connect residential neighborhoods Parks and and community facilities,such as the library and city hall,parks,schools, Pathways athletic facilities,swimming pools,historic districts,the Downtown,as well as other commercial and retail activity centers in Meridian. 4.05.00 G Preserve,protect,enhance,and wisely use natural resources. Stewardship 4.05.01 0 Protect and enhance existing waterways,groundwater,wetlands,wildlife Stewardship habitat,air,soils,and other natural resources. 4.05.01E A Assess environmental impact of potential new development,infill,and Stewardship redevelopment. 5.02.00 G Celebrate Meridian's historical,cultural,and agricultural heritage. Historic Preservation 5.02.01 0 Enhance and restore the historical quality of Old Town. Historic Preservation 5.02.01A A Maintain and implement design and building standards for historically Historic significant buildings and resources in Old Town. Preservation 6.01.00 G Facilitate the efficient movement of people and products to and from the Transportation City. and Streets 6.01.01 0 Support multi-modal and complete-street transportation improvements. Transportation and Streets 6.01.01C A Improve ingress and egress opportunities for all modes of transportation in Transportation Downtown. and Streets 6.01.02 0 Enhance existing transportation systems. Transportation and Streets 6.01.02D A Consider needed sidewalk,pathway,landscaping,and lighting improvements Transportation with all land use decisions. and Streets 6.01.021 A Pursue the extension of Idaho Ave.and/or Broadway Ave. to Commercial Dr. Transportation and the extension of East 3rd St.from Fairview Ave. to Pine Ave.in and Streets Downtown. EXHIBIT A.2 TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-01 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 107 of 265 ID Policy Policy Section Type 6.01.02L A Work with ACHD to implement projects from the 2012 Downtown Meridian Transportation Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan. and Streets EXHIBIT A.2 TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-01 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 108 of 265 Attachment C: Meridian Pathways Master Plan Meridian Pathway Plan L L L L LJ L U J L L L LJ I I � r -•-•--Alternative Route -Existing Pathway � �?r Pr E STATE Street Route AVE......Proposed Pathway E:P.INE;QQVE H h W 777 e s��x z v h N W W N W �Z=Z W IDAHO AVE"' ti }? y Z E IDAHO AVE Z�Z �S z W � ' z BROADW AY AVE E BROADWAY AVE ' Q ':Q ............ TF �Ld W W z WORAILROAD°ST .__...-..... Z ............._ ............... ....+ i ■ ......... ....................................... WBO.WER:ST FFE gOV11ER-ST A 09y� y z H¢ O E ADA-ST=N Legend N ov ;Urban Renewal District W TAYLOR AVE Q� 0 Parcels �_E KING-ST } Railroad ® I I N U 250�Feet EXHIBIT A.2 TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-01 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020- Page 109 of 265 Attachment D: Downtown Meridian Street Cross-section Master Plan Examples Main Street MAIN STREET:Ada Street to Carlton Avenue o N.Fa10914mt1,1 Ong,is band oe edam, V, Preservation ►'• - P,,• of zmmmg ROW.Maimaly eAdiq Alm along Parking p—Ild erkhg. fiY Sidewalks d lm •� r Pathway r Streetscape Rufar — m F- Parkway Buffer a ••- Furniture Y F Ir,,tjV '� oink nvt Lighting ✓Regulred.�0eslred -A6 AAME& Jan Edding edge d ROW Mamaaeadfig aerh Mc Meimam addmg0.ol road Eacting edged ROW - wdh parallel parking(lyp.) I26'm CLCL pI R..d PN intended to be consistent thematic elements,and must reconfiguration.Future improvements will generally be Ada Street to Colton Avenue be carried forward appropriately as consistent entryway located behind the back ofcurb,and occur eitherthrough thematic elements for the length of the corridor private redevelopment and infill projects,orim provements CONSIDERATIONS: Crvsa-section Width go Net(ROW) 804e0 DESCRIPTION OF ULTIMATE CONDITIONS: by MDC and ints to ainshoul berg ay5and orunnecessary Main between Ada and Carhon is a tradkional downtown aaess points to Main should be restricted or removed Road Three Iaaea wah three la"ea wnh ae"rev streetlined predominately with older buildings and some The only significant variation to the typical existing(2013) with redevelopment,particularly near alleyways r"erwr"a"e mr"lase infill redevelopment.Restaurants and professional sendces streetcross-section is the potential forshortcenter median Parkmq Parallel/Angled(FOR Paralld(hth'ideal a rethepredorninatetypes ofexisting uses,with some gov- islands.These islands are envisioned to occurwhere tmf- sides) ernment services and a number of historic structures.The fic patterns will be minimally impacted,generally only Parking Cavanty' III U street is critical for north-south vehicular and pedestrian restricting alleys from becoming through streets,and be walkway.(ace.side) 6-feet detached. 6 fed detached,mk connectivity,and is the primary arterial access for busi- built to provide additional aesthetic and thematic ben- varies ness and residential uses between Fairview and Franklin. efits to the street environment.On-street parking should Buffer(ea.sidel Vanes 8-feet per sl andardc generally be parallel where it occurs,with angled parking Pathway None None INTENT: discouraged due to traffic and safety impacts,especially Bike appp" None Sharrawc The intent of this cross-section is to maintain and improve for bicycle users. ^h,ki"gimpacta sad Ntvre aalaea are eaumatea.deem indicate coded. connectivity,and balance the needs of both automotive ao"dine..,a"d a acme fell compliaaae wuh craaa aectie".Ormewaya.fire and pedestrian uses.Detached walkways and landscape IMPLEMENTATION P ROC E55: hydrants and vthercondllivns may alterFinal count.See Parkingsectivn buffersarethetop priority,with on-street parkingelso Inmost cases the actual roadway for the Main Street cross- a"der Street Oeai, being critical.Street trees,signage,pavers,and lighting are section is already built-out with little need for roadway DOWNTOWN MERIDIAN I CITY CORE STREET CROSS-SECTION MASTER PLAN STREET DESIGN EXHIBIT A.2 TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-01 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 110 of 265 East 2nd Street EAST 2ND STREET: Broadway Avenue to Carlton Avenue aResipn is b...de oing Nrtoednhts y of emotions 00W}.Praraton Fe Parking es I fiY Sidewalk, F r Pathway Fe Streetscape Buffer Parkway B°Har j �. "4•„Wv vinc; Furniture __ __ - F Lighting h ✓Regnlred.0 Bashed R a n - _ 1 a L f wring edge d POW Edsling edge of ImW ld'Pedestrian :d Road 19`Pad deriae Note:See the app.odk..for alternatire cross-section designs While cross-section configu rations wkh increased parking IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: Broadway Avenue to Carlton Avenge are provided,in most conditions parking servicing local As a segment,the frequent cross-street and alley breaks CONSIDERATIONS: businesses should be consolidated off-street or located allow East 2nd to be developed more piecemeal than many Cross-section Width 80-f.WROW) 80-feet elsewhere,allowing for a more lively and dynamic pedes- other areas ofthe City Core.However,the curb-less nature East 2nd between Broadway and Carlton consists ofshort trian environment that increases area draw. ofthe identified cross-sections and resulting grade changes Road I-way No-way.curb-less block lengths with frequent cross-street and alley inter- DESCRIPTION OF ULTIMATE CONDITIONS: with new facilities will likely require improvements to be Parking Angled and parallel Anglad,parallel and sections.The only through Cross-street on this segment none made for the full width ofthe cross-section(both sides of however is Pine,with all other streets dead-ending within East 2nd is intended to be a charming traditional down- the road).It may be possible for redevelopment to occur Parking Capadty' 79 57(.ay.ary) a mile.This limited connectivity is less conducive to heavy town street that is able to cater to social shopping and in half-block increments,between a cross-street and alley, Walkway,(ea.side) and mhsd datachad, Oetaahed or bollard traffic movements and provides additional opportunities dining experiences through unique design enhancements but there is like) greater Ion term cost-savings to do a g,agm.n s. ,spar,ed.width caries. for pedestrian supportive focus and enhancement. and comfortable pedestrian spaces.While trees are kept y g g r 5-feet or lass 5-feet ram. Whole block at a time.Storm-water is an important con- Vases rain 19'whara INTENT: to provide a more pedestrian scaled and comfortable sideration.Improvements should occur as public-private Buffer W.,ida) Varies exile,A,ith walkway pedestrian environment,they are pulled further from the partnerships to generate and foster greater place-making, This street segment is unique in that the short block lengths buildings to allow for more unobstructed business and Pathway None None raise awareness,and be supportive f new businesses or Bike Se t None None and limited traffic allow for multiple cross-sections which community streetscape uses,such as outdoor dining- renovations able to make use of the facilities. pp0f while consistent in thematic and alignment,offer a vari- Cross-section options exist for medians or other special 'Parking impacts and fo uracaluas ara asrnoata,do not,,dicata interim ety of configurations.Priority improvements should be street features such as topiary or artwork.See appendix and e.nma foil,enThe,e with,ro,, tion Driveway,,fir. focused on a wider pedestrian environment with emphasis hydrants,and other conditions may altar final count.See Parking seam on unique and memorable place-making configurations. andarSlreet Resign. DOWNTOWN MERIDIAN CITY CORE STREET CROSS—SECTION MASTER PLAN STREET DESIGN EXHIBIT A.2 TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-01 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 111 of 265 East 3rd Street Franklin Road to Broadway Avenue ., {NewFaeing Nvth} �i ,� Oesign is based eastern edge d V Pres nation �, E E >..ry eAAitg ROW,bmmay vary ifeom ` sistem It,—tlouaus segmeote Fe Parking V Sidewalks ri Pathway F. Street—ii.buffer f✓ Parkway Buffer V F- hraiure W Lighting ✓Ragulred.�0enlrad .RNo >s u a Eristing edge oI ROW 27 Pedsmrimt Il Erlstiq CLnf Road(varies) 7 201m CLnl11-Rwd Alignment W'Pada M��I INTENT: ample buffers for the detached pathways and sidewalks Franklin 1.1 Bodw try Avenue The primary intent of this cross-section and any varia- are all important safety and aesthetic elements for the CONSIDERATIONS: Lion is to provide for safe and convenient north-south long-term health ofthe neighborhoods-Bulbouts should bnnn-nantlnn width 80-fset(ROW) 76 feet pedestrian connectivity between Franklin and downtown. be developed at street corners to further enhance safety East3rd between Franklin and Broadway is predominately The required ten-foot detached pathway must be on the and provide additional opportunities forlandscaping and Read Two-way Iwo-way residential in nature,but is entirely within the Transit Ori- west side of the road,which has fewer driveway conflicts additional district thematic elements. Parking Parallel Parallel ented and Cultural district(TOD).Improvements should be and opportunities for further reductions with redevelop- Parking Capacity' Vanes 51 supportive of higher density and transit supportive uses in IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: PP g y PP meat taking access from alleyways.Walkways must ed Wdkwa s lea.side) Varian.t,d t.6-feet. (,,tn ad.6-feet in. ultimate conditions,and all efforts should be made with detached,and residential appropriate lighting provided Though implementation may occurwith fragmented parcel y fragmamad gape (aant Hide) redevelopment to provide for additional enhancements to enhance safety.On-street parking should be provided, specific redevelopment,it is assumed that implementation Buffer( id) Vol- 8-foot land:raga hffe,. which capitalize on these future services.Alleyways are but angled and perpendicular configurations are heavily of the pathway will require concerted efforts on behalf ea.se .11, another important consideration with the corridor,and discouraged to ensure continuity of the pathway and to of MDC and City.The pathway is critical for accessibility, Pathway Na ran.10-feat min.(west must be adequately signed and enforced to ensure pedes- reduce back-out conflicts with through traffic. safety,and quality of life,and should be implemented in side) trian safety along the corridor.While alley use is already blocks and segments.Interim redevelopment enhance- Bike Suppo,t Na Shar,aws predominately one-way forwestbound travel,this should DESCRIPTION OF ULTIMATE CONDITIONS: ments may not require full improvements if MDC and 'P,rkingimpaet df,L,,rma:aTee.Li taa.do U.dinatemt,rim be verified and coordinated with impacted stakeholders, While Fast 3rd is not intended to serve as an entryway the City are not able to expand and maintain pathway —diti—,and ansnme foil enmpfi ne with crane sennnm Ori,t aysfira hy- and considered for access with redevelopment. corridor,it is important for connectivity into the down- components,but redevelopment must make allowances dram,and other ennd'ri—may alte,finalceam.See Parking—ti.node, town area and should be inviting.Tree lined streets with for future installation. Street Oe r, MCA DOWNTOWN MERIDIAN I CITY CORE STREET CROSS—SECTION MASTER PLAN STREET DESIGN EXHIBIT A.2 TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-01 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 112 of 265 Broadway Avenue to Carlton Avenue m (Yew Facing North) ' G Bosign is based m easiem edge d r✓ Preser.au,n <rv .A.ing ROW,hm to eeynmm I. Parking ",, v — simem krmmimms segmems r✓ Sidewalks - ^ :In-1E F Pathway I. Street—pe Buffer ri Parkway buffer y r Fnrmtar, F Lighting 'C ✓R, d.�0esired m quir .R ❑��II Edmiog edged ROW 22'Pdam-Idm 17m Edmin CLd Rmd(eaeim) R' 2I'I,1L flI wRoad Ni _.I Whdmttien A tion south of the tracks,and to help improve pedestrian and provide additional opportunities for landscaping and Broadway Avenue to Carlton Avenue connectivity with urban uses to the west.Walkways must additional district thematic elements. IF be detached by landscape buffers with large canopy trees, CONSIDERATIONS: IM and residential appropriate lighting must be provided to PLEMENTATION PROCESS: Cross-se nylon Width 8n-f,et(ROW) 76-feet Though East 3rd between Broadway and Carlton is pre- enhance safety.On-street parking should be provided, Though implementation may occurwith fragmented parcel Road Iw,wa, Iwo-way dom irately residential in nature,it is adjacent to three but angled and perpendicular configurations are heavilyspecific redevelopment,it is assumed that implementa- Parking Parallol Pardo]different commercial districts including the Northern discouraged to ensure continuity ofthe pathway and to tion of the pathway will require more concerted efforts Parking Cgadty' 63 64 Gateway,Washington&Main,and Traditional City Core reduce back outconflicts with through traffic.All rede- on behalf of MDC and the City.Interim redevelopment M.Ikwars attaohad d u B-faet. Bataohad.6-fear min, districts.While efforts should be made to enhance district velopment must be considerate to and supportive ofthe enhancements may not require full improvements if the frag„mod gaps (oast side) identities,With the proximity to the commercial districts, residential nature of this corridor segment. City is not able to expand and maintain pathway com- 8-fact landsoaPo baron, opportunities existto blend boundaries for uses supportive ponents,but redevelopment must make allowances for B,Ifer(aa.sld,) Yari,s ,I. of the overall Destination Downtown vision plan. future installation. P.thwa No Yes.IB-foet,io:(rest DESCRIPTION OF ULTIMATE CONDITIONS: While East 3rd is not intended to serve as an entryway r side) INTENT: corridor,it is importantfor connectivity into the downtown Bika Support No ;harrows The primary intent ofthis cross-section and anyvariation is area and should be inviting.The tree lined streets with 'Parking i,pact:and fatnro.alu,s ara e,at.,do not mdiaato don. to provide for a safe and convenient north-south pathway ample buffers for the detached pathways and sidewalks oonditi......doss,,,fml,,,plians,wither..s...ri-O,i..w.y,.flr,hy- connectionbetweenCarltonandBroadway.The required are all important safety and aesthetic elements for the dre ta.a ad,thar o,nditl,ns,ay sits final o,,t.Sao Parking...uon,nder ten-foot detached pathway must be on the west-side ofthe long-term health ofthe neighborhoods.Bulb-outs should So-aet Basig". road to maintain alignment With the pathway configure- be developed at street corners to further enhance safety DOWNTOWN MERIDIAN I CITY CORE STREET CROSS-SECTION MASTER PLAN STREET DESIGN EXHIBIT A.2 TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-01 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 113 of 265 Broadway Ave BROADWAYAVENUE: Main Street to East 2nd Street hROW Earn} Oevgn's based ROW on elsnp f✓ Preservation A, e�h nuaharn edge Fe Parking 2 m SidewalksNnvE I. Pa hway flevf Y r Streetscape MN, t r Parkway Hooey Furniture 'r'4�v Fo lighting E F F Emitimihips4ROW no,s sT 20'tn Ixu inRCL d Road(varies) 201n CL d IlmRaed 27Pedulnsn should reflect this.While the ten-foot multi-use pathway alignments across intersections,and to reduce setback Main street to East 2nd street is required on the south-side of the street,it's possible impacts to neighboring properties and buildings. that future pathway connectivity may be integrated with CONSIDERATIONS: redevelopment,and the pathway pulled within the adfa- IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: Cross-s a cllen Width 79-feet(ROW) 84.5-(eat Broadway between Main and East 2nd is generally indus- cent property.On-street parking and standard streetscape Curb line changes necessaryto be supportiveof pedestrian Road I-way I-way trial storage on the southern side of the roadway,along to improvements are required,and must align and integrate activities and allow businesses greater street presence will Parkmg angled Parallel the railroad tracks,and dominated by older buildings in with improvements to the east and west. likely require improvements to occur for the full length Parking Capacity' 31 IS disrepair on the northern side.Sidewalk facilities are also in of the block,on one or both sides of the roadway.Unless oetachad.4 ro 5-fail disrepair,and non-existent on the south.The streetscape DESCRIPTION OF ULTIMATE CONDITIONS: large scale redevelopment occurs,public participation will Walkways(a a silo) north side.none cn Oetachad.5-feet(hin) on the north-side of Broadway has been redeveloped on The north-side of this cross-section includes standard be necessary for implementation and play a large role in south side, the corridor segments both to the west and east—only required streetscape improvements,and a wider walkway redevelopment of the streetscape,particularly with the Wier W.side) Varna: 8-feet perctandardc this segment is lacking improvements. consistent with other corridor improvements to the east. multi-use pathway.With eventual removal of existing angled pathway None Ye: The south-side of the street provides the required path- parking,it is expected that additional off-street surface or Bike Seppt,t Nona None INTENT: way connection,but may simply mirror improvements on garage parking will need to be provided elsewhereto offset Future improvements will need to support mixed use the north-side,or'ust meet streetscape standards if the loss and accommodate future downtown parking needs 'Parking impacts and Pomre rime:era Rh,r esdo net Indicate interim P PP 1 P P 9 oonditlons.and assume full eompllanoe with cross sestlon.0rivaways,Orehy- development and balance the pedestrian environmentwith pathway is integrated into future development through the Improvements on the north-side of the roadway should drams.and other condemns mar altar final court.Si.Parkmg eeceon coder parking provisions.It is expected that future redevelop- southern properties.Parallel parking is provided instead be focus to compliment Idaho and increase demand for Street 0esige. ment on both sides of the road will be transit supportive of angled to enhance safety and create a more pedestrian land to the south. higherdensity In ixed uses,and the pedestrian environment friendly corridor,and to lim it wider cross-sections,maintain DOWNTOWN MERIDIAN I CITY CORE STREET CROSS-SECTION MASTER PLAN STREET DESIGN EXHIBIT A.2 TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-01 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 114 of 265 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 20-008 BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, A/K/A THE MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, ALSO KNOWN AS THE MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, RECOMMENDING AND ADOPTING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MERIDIAN REVITALIZATION PLAN, WHICH FIRST AMENDMENT SEEKS TO DEANNEX CERTAIN PARCELS FROM THE EXISTING DOWNTOWN DISTRICT PROJECT AREA; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CHAIR, VICE- CHAIR, OR AGENCY ADMINISTRATOR TO TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION; PROVIDING FOR THE RESOLUTION TO BE EFFECTIVE UPON ITS PASSAGE AND APPROVAL; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THIS RESOLUTION, made on the date hereinafter set forth by the Urban Renewal Agency of Meridian, Idaho, also known as the Meridian Development Corporation, an independent public body, corporate and politic, authorized under the authority of the Idaho Urban Renewal Law of 1965, Chapter 20, Title 50, Idaho Code, as amended (the "Law") and the Local Economic Development Act, Chapter 29, Title 50, Idaho Code, as amended (the "Act"), a duly created and functioning urban renewal agency for Meridian, Idaho, hereinafter referred to as the "MDC." WHEREAS, on July 24, 2001, the City Council (the "City Council") of the City of Meridian, Idaho (the "City"), adopted Resolution No. 01-367 establishing MDC; WHEREAS, on October 8, 2002, the City Council, after notice duly published, conducted a public hearing on the Meridian Revitalization Plan Urban Renewal Project, which is also referred to as the Downtown District (the "Downtown District Plan"); findings; WHEREAS, following said public hearing, the City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 02-987 on December 3, 2002, approving the Downtown District Plan and making certain findings; RESOLUTION NO. 20- - I Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 115 of 265 WHEREAS, the Downtown District Plan project area is referred to herein as the "Existing Project Area"; WHEREAS, MDC seeks to amend the Existing Project Area to deannex certain parcels as described in the First Amendment defined below; WHEREAS, MDC has reviewed the financial impact of the deannexation on its allocation of revenue and has concluded the remaining allocation of revenue is sufficient to pay its operations, obligations and to continue to implement the terms of the Downtown District Plan; WHEREAS, MDC has prepared the First Amendment to the Meridian Revitalization Plan (the "First Amendment"), as set forth in Exhibit 1 attached hereto, identifying the parcels to be deannexed from the Existing Project Area; WHEREAS, the First Amendment amends the Downtown District Plan, which contains provisions of revenue allocation financing as allowed by the Act; WHEREAS, the First Amendment is expected to be adopted by the City Council in accordance with the requirements of the Law and the Act, specifically, but not limited to the requirements set forth in Idaho Code §§ 50-2008 and 50-2906; WHEREAS, the MDC Board finds it in the best interests of MDC and the public to recommend approval of the adoption of the First Amendment, as prepared by MDC, and as set forth in Exhibit 1 attached hereto, and to forward it to the Mayor and City, for adoption in accordance with the requirements of the Law and the Act. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The above statements are true and correct. Section 2. That the MDC Board recommends that the First Amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit 1, identifying the parcels to be deannexed from the Existing Project Area, be adopted by the City Council including any sections, modifications, or text discussed at the March 25, 2020, MDC Board meeting. Section 3. That this Resolution constitutes the necessary action of MDC under the Law, Section 50-2008, Idaho Code, and the Act. Section 4. The Chair or Vice-Chair of the Board of Commissioners, or the MDC Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to take all steps necessary and convenient in partnership with the City to facilitate the City's adoption of the First Amendment. RESOLUTION NO. 20- - 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 116 of 265 Section 5. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Meridian, Idaho, also known as the Meridian Development Corporation, on March 25, 2020. Signed by the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners and attested by the Secretary to the Board of Commissioners, on March 25, 2020. APPROVED: 1 f By C air o the Board ATTEST: By � Secre A9 0039,v. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 20- - Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 117 of 265 Mayor Robert E. Simison E City Council Members: IDIAN�-- Treg Bernt Brad Hoaglun Joe Borton Jessica Perreault A H O Luke Cavener Liz Strader EXHIBIT A.1 TO RESOLUTION PZ-20-01 TO: Meridian Planning &Zoning Commission DATE: April 9, 2020 FROM: Ted Baird, Deputy City Attorney RE: First Amendment to the Meridian Revitalization Plan The first of two Resolutions before you is to recommend an amendment to the existing Meridian Revitalization Plan to de-annex certain land from that Plan so that it can be included in the proposed Union District Plan. As background, the 16 acres for the proposed Union District Plan are currently within the boundaries of the Meridian Revitalization Plan(the "Downtown District Plan"), which terminates on December 31, 2026. Idaho Code does not allow a parcel to be within the boundaries of two urban renewal districts, therefore, the parcels currently in the Downtown District Plan must be de-annexed pursuant to a plan amendment. The de-annexed area has the same boundaries as the proposed Union District Plan. RECOMMENDATION: As the First Amendment represents a de-annexation of lands within the existing Downtown District Plan and does not add any land are to the Downtown District Plan or change any land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the proposed First Amendment maintains consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. For additional information and findings, please refer to the April 8, 2020 Planning Division Memorandum. City of Meridian . 33 E. Broadway Avenue . Meridian, ID 83642 Meridian E4CM4% TA dQ AViW%,T0Y9aP 1gKbf 265 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MERIDIAN REVITALIZATION PLAN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MERIDIAN URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY (also known as the Meridian Development Corporation) CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO Ordinance No. 02-987 Adopted December 3, 2002 Effective December_, 2002, publication First Amendment to the Plan Ordinance No. Adopted , 2020 Effective , 2020,publication FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MERIDIAN REVITALIZATION PLAN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT- 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 119 of 265 BACKGROUND This First Amendment ("First Amendment") to the Meridian Revitalization Plan Urban Renewal Project(the"Plan")deannexes certain parcels from the plan area/revenue allocation area created by the Plan commonly referred to as the "Downtown District Project Area," adopted by Meridian City Council Ordinance No. 02-987, on December 3, 2002. The scope of this First Amendment is limited to addressing the deannexation of certain parcels from the Downtown District Project Area. It is important to note this First Amendment to the Plan does not extend the Plan's duration. The Plan terminates on December 31,2026;however,revenue allocation proceeds will be received in 2027 pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-2905(7). As a result of the deannexation,in 2020 through the remaining years of the Plan,the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Meridian, Idaho, also known as the Meridian Development Corporation (the "MDC") will cease receiving an allocation of revenues from the deannexed parcels. The increment value of the parcels deannexed from the Downtown District Project Area shall be included in the net taxable value of the taxing district when calculating the subsequent property tax levies pursuant to section 63-803, Idaho Code. The increment value shall also be included in subsequent notification of taxable value for each taxing district pursuant to section 63- 1312, Idaho Code, and subsequent certification of actual and adjusted market values for each school district pursuant to section 63-315, Idaho Code. The Ada County Assessor's Office maintains the value information, including the increment value, if any, included on the new construction roll for new construction associated with the deannexed parcels. The amount added to the new construction roll will equal the amount by which the December 31, 2019, increment value exceeds the increment value as of December 31, 2006. House Bill 606, effective July 1, 2016, amended the Local Economic Development Act, Chapter 29, Title 50, Idaho Code, as amended(the"Act") firmly establishing"[fJor plans adopted or modified prior to July 1, 2016, and for subsequent modifications of those urban renewal plans, the value of the base assessment roll of property within the revenue allocation area shall be determined as if the modification had not occurred." Idaho Code § 50-2903(4). Though the provisions of Idaho Code § 50-2903A do not apply to the Plan, a plan amendment or modification to accommodate a de-annexation in the revenue allocation boundary is a specifically identified exception to a base reset. Idaho Code§ 50-2903A(1)(a)(iii). This highlights the legislative support for these types of amendments. AMENDMENTS TO THE PLAN 1. Definitions. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed to such terms in the Plan. 2. The following defined terms are amended throughout the Plan as follows: (a) Delete "Project Area" and replace with "Amended Project Area" except where specifically referenced in this First Amendment. (b) Delete references to "Attachment 5" and replace with "Attachment 5, as supplemented by Attachment 5A" except where specifically referenced in this First Amendment. FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MERIDIAN REVITALIZATION PLAN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT- 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 120 of 265 3. Amendment to List of Attachments. The List of Attachments on page vi is amended by deleting the list of attachments and replacing it as follows: Attachment 1 Legal Description of the Project Area and Revenue Allocation Area Boundaries Attachment IA Legal Description of the Boundary of the Deannexed Area Attachment 2 Project Area-Revenue Allocation Area Boundary Map Attachment 2A Boundary Map of the Deannexed Area Attachment 3 Properties Which May be Acquired by the Agency Attachment 4 Map Depicting Expected Land Uses and Current Zoning Within the Amended Project Area Attachment 5 Economic Feasibility Study, Meridian Urban Renewal Area Attachment 5A Supplement to the Economic Feasibility Study: Financial Analysis Related to the 2020 Deannexation 4. Amendment to Section 100 of the Plan. Section 100 is amended by deleting the list of attachments and replacing it as follows: Legal Description of the Project Area and Revenue Allocation Area Boundaries (Attachment 1); Legal Description of the Boundary of the Deannexed Area (Attachment IA); Project Area-Revenue Allocation Area Boundary Map (Attachment 2); Boundary Map of the Deannexed Area (Attachment 2A); Properties Which May be Acquired by the Agency (Attachment 3); Map Depicting Expected Land Uses and Current Zoning Within the Amended Project Area(Attachment 4); Economic Feasibility Study, Meridian Urban Renewal Area(Attachment 5); Supplement to the Economic Feasibility Study: Financial Analysis Related to the 2020 Deannexation(Attachment 5A). FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MERIDIAN REVITALIZATION PLAN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT- 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 121 of 265 5 Amendment to Section 102.1 of the Plan. (a) Section 102.1 entitled "CONFORMANCE WITH STATE OF IDAHO URBAN RENEWAL LAW OF 1965, AS AMENDED" is amended by adding new paragraphs to the end of the existing language as follows: This First Amendment to the Plan (the "First Amendment") deannexes certain parcels from the existing Project Area, resulting in an "Amended Project Area" as further described and shown in Attachments 1, 1A, 2 and 2A. In accordance with the Law,this First Amendment was submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian. After consideration of the First Amendment, the Commission filed a Resolution dated _, 2020, with the City Council stating that the First Amendment is in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Meridian, adopted on December 17, 2019, by Resolution No. 19-2179. Pursuant to the Law, the City Council, having published due notice thereof, held a public hearing on the First Amendment. Notice of the hearing was duly published in a newspaper having general circulation. The City Council adopted the First Amendment on 2020,pursuant to Ordinance No. 6. Amendment to Section 200 of the Plan. (a) Section 200 entitled "DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AREA" is deleted and replaced as follows: DESCRIPTION OF THE AMENDED PROJECT AREA The boundaries of the Project Area and of the Revenue Allocation Area are described in Attachment 1, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and are shown on the Project Area and Revenue Allocation Area Boundary Map, attached hereto as Attachment 2 and incorporated herein by reference. The Project Area includes several parcels of property which are located outside the geographical boundaries of the City but within the City's impact area. MDC has an existing agreement with Ada County related to such parcels. The First Amendment has no impact on that agreement. Pursuant to the First Amendment, the boundaries of the deannexed area is described in the Legal Description of the Boundary of the Deannexed Area in Attachment lA and are shown on the Boundary Map of the Deannexed Area in Attachment 2A. FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MERIDIAN REVITALIZATION PLAN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT- 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 122 of 265 The attachments referenced above are attached hereto and are incorporated herein by reference. 7. Amendment to Section 302 of the Plan. (a) Section 302 is amended by deleting the first sentence of the second paragraph and replacing it as follows: The Amended Project Area includes the area as described in Section 200. 8. Amendment to Section 504 of the Plan. (a) Section 504 is amended by adding a new sentence immediately following the end of the first sentence of the first paragraph as follows: Revenue allocation financing authority for the deannexed parcels pursuant to the First Amendment will be terminated effective January 1, 2020. (b) Section 504 is amended by adding the following at the end of the fourth paragraph as follows: No modifications to the analysis set forth in Attachment 5 have been made as a result of the First Amendment. The estimated financial impact to MDC as a result of the deannexation of certain underdeveloped parcels from the existing Project Area pursuant to the First Amendment is set forth in Attachment 5A. 9. Amendment to Section 504.1 of the Plan. (a) Section 504.1 is amended by adding a new sentence at the end of the paragraph as follows: No modifications to the Study have been made as a result of this First Amendment; however, Attachment 5A includes the estimated financial impact to MDC as a result of the deannexation of certain underdeveloped parcels from the existing Project Area pursuant to the First Amendment prepared by Kushlan I Associates and SMR Development, LLC. 10. Amendment to Section 504.3 of the Plan. (a) Section 504.3 is amended by adding a new sentence at the end of the paragraph as follows: The deannexation of parcels from the existing Project Area pursuant to the First Amendment will not substantively change this analysis. 11. Amendment to Section 504.4 of the Plan. (a) Section 504.4 is amended by adding a new sentence at the end of the second paragraph as follows: The deannexation of parcels from the existing Project Area pursuant to the First Amendment will reduce the amount of revenue generated by revenue allocation as set forth in Attachment 5A. (b) Section 504.4 is amended by adding a new sentence at the end of the third paragraph as follows: Attachment 5A includes the estimated financial impact to MDC as a result of the deannexation of certain underdeveloped parcels from the existing Project Area. Based on the FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MERIDIAN REVITALIZATION PLAN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT- 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 123 of 265 findings set forth in Attachment 5A,the conclusion is the deannexation of certain parcels from the existing Project Area does not materially reduce revenue allocation and the Project continues to be feasible. 12. Amendment to Section 800 of the Plan. (a) Section 800 is amended by adding a new sentence at the end of the first paragraph as follows: The deannexation of parcels from the existing Project Area pursuant to the First Amendment has no impact on the duration of this Plan. 13. Amendment to Plan to add new Attachment IA. The Plan is amended to add new Attachment IA entitled "Legal Description of the Boundary of the Deannexed Area," attached hereto. 14. Amendment to Plan to add new Attachment 2A. The Plan is amended to add new Attachment 2A entitled"Boundary Map of the Deannexed Area," attached hereto. 15. Amendment to Plan to add new Attachment 5A. The Plan is amended to add new Attachment 5A entitled "Supplement to the Economic Feasibility Study: Financial Analysis Related to the 2020 Deannexation," attached hereto. 16. Downtown District Plan Remains in Effect. Except as expressly modified in this First Amendment, the Plan and the Attachments thereto remain in full force and effect. FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MERIDIAN REVITALIZATION PLAN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT- 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 124 of 265 Attachment IA Legal Description of the Boundary of the Deannexed Area Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 125 of 265 Attachment 2A Boundary Map of the Deannexed Area Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 126 of 265 Attachment 5A Supplement to the Economic Feasibility Study: Financial Analysis Related to the 2020 Deannexation Ada County Owner 2019 2019 Total 2019 Tax Parcel of Base Tax Incremental Tax Record Tax Obligation Publicly Owned Tax Exempt Parcels R5672000856 City Of Meridian $0 $0 $0 R5672000870 Meridian Free Library District $0 $0 $0 R7596000080 City Of Meridian $0 $0 $0 R7596000075 City Of Meridian $0 $0 $0 R7596000065 City Of Meridian $0 $0 $0 R7596000092 Meridian Development $0 $0 $0 Corporation R7794650100 Second&Broadway $0 $0 $0 Condominium Owners Association R7794650200 COMPASS $0 $0 $0 R7794650300 Valley Regional Transit $0 $0 $0 R7794650400 Valley Regional Transit $0 $0 $0 R7794650500 COMPASS $0 $0 $0 Total Publicly Owned $o $0 $0 Privately Owned Taxable Parcels S1107325600 $6,805.92 $9,325.84 $16,131.76 Oregon Short Line R R Co S1107325700 $3,858.81 $1,934.81 $5,793.62 Oregon Short Line R R Co R7596000545 $686.75 $784.96 $1,471.71 Oregon Short Line R R Co R7596000545-A $0 $0 $0 Oregon Short Line R R Co Total Tax Obligation-Private $11,351.48 $12,045.61 $23,397.09 2019 Incremental Revenue loss to MDC as a result of De-annexation Minimal De-annexation Source: Ada County Assessor Records 4851-4344-7734,v.3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 127 of 265 5awtooth Land Surveying, LLC 5w o�T P: (208) 398-8 1 04 F: (208) 398-8 1 05 2030 5. Washington Ave., Emmett, ID 83G 17 De-Annexation & Annexation Legal Description for Union District A tract of land consisting of approximately 15.90 acres being a portion of Section 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Section Corner common to Sections 12 and 13 of Township 3 North, Range 1 West and Sections 7 and 18 of Township 3 North, Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian,thence along the section line common to said Sections 12 and 13, being the centerline of Franklin Road North 89°32'43" West 1328.12 feet to the East 1/16th Corner on said section line; thence North 53°01'09" East, 2291.26 feet to the intersection of the southerly right of way of Union Pacific Railroad and the westerly right of way of N. Main St. and the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 0'33'11" East, coincident with said westerly right of way of N. Main St., 639.69 feet to the northerly right of way of E. Broadway Ave.; thence South 88°42'24"East, coincident with said northerly right of way of E. Broadway Ave., 380.05 feet to the westerly right of way of E. 2nd St.; thence North 0°33'15"East, coincident with said westerly right of way of E. 2nd St., 336.24 feet to the northerly right of way of E. Idaho Ave.; thence South 88°38'29"East, coincident with said northerly right of way of E. Idaho Ave.,464.82 feet to the easterly right of way of E. 3rd St.; thence South 1°21'54"West, coincident with said easterly right of way of E. 31d St., 978.24 feet to said southerly right of way of Union Pacific Railroad; thence North 88'30'19"West, coincident with said southerly right of way of Union Pacific Railroad, 831.04 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. L 0 G1S ERF G a115740 'P fIf I ll o 4rF OF vFFF BEAG�'� P : \ 2020 \ 1 EMT\ 120018 - MERIDIAN STATION DE AN N EXAT10N \ Survey \ Drawings \ Descriptions \ 1 23018 - de - a ;sr" exation ' egal . docxB . doc Page 11 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 128 of 265 REVENUE ALLOCATION BOUNDARY OF THE MERIDIAN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT DE ANNEXATION PARCEL MERIDIAN, IDAHO W CHERRY LN E FAIRVIEW AVE 1 �-+. _ �� Z I <- _ m , :_ z �ss LINE BEARING DISTANCE D Ll N 00033'11"E 639.69' ° v L2 S 88 4224"E 380.05' jr` r Z. } C1 L3 N 00033'15"E 336.24' ' z` Z y r I I t L4 S 8803829"E 464.82' ri o L5 S 01021'54"W 978.24' L6 N 88030'19"W 831.04' m m m m 441.(siI' ry w -ram cn Z 0 0 W PINE AVE -i -i E PINE AVE W IDAHO AVE L4 . .-...... L2 - W BROADWAY AVE ,,., J ::^::�ii:•i_i:::iiiiiiiii�ii?i: POB RAIL ROAD LC i IT W FRANKLIN RD EI/16COR 'Z----- 12-7-- E FRANKLIN RD N 89°32'43"W 13,18 1328.12' Cn }r D zi_ i ' s zlZ � G m 11574 OF E A��' NTS INTERSTATE 84 PROJECT.' OWNERIDEVELOPER: 2030 S. WASHINGTON AVE. DWG# URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT EMMETT, ID 83617 120018-EX DE—ANNEXATION BILL TRUAX �� P: (208)398-8104 PROJECT# MERIDIAN,ID. F: (208)398-8105 120018 SEC, 7 & 18, T3N, R1 E, B.M. 208-914-6131 SEC, 12 & 13, T3N, R1 W, B.M. SHEET DATE 1127120 LonsSuweyinq LLG �yWWSAWT-OOTHLS.COM 1 OF 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 129 of 265 UNION DISTRICT CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO E PINE AVE z K z m m m EZ N w �7 D z ;U 0 z 0 z x 0 S 803829"E 464.8 ' v .................................... E IDAHO AVE "� s;:? ::::;:;:`2 ::;: c::;ii:`.;::i::ii:`.iiii ii:`.: i}iir7.•ii:•i:•i:•:ii•::•isi:i•:�s?i:•a::ii::(.:i:_i:??ii.{:ii:i::c:�: ....:................................................................. ........... .............................................. ........... Ln ::•:::•::•:::•:::•:•i:•isi•::•i:•::•i:•i:•iii:•::•i::::::::•:::::::::: M 0 O ` :1: V N S 8804224"E 380.05' a, E BR OADWAY AVE :::. Ln :. c 2 �., M :•.. 0 O .................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................... .................................. .... ........:::...... :::::.:.... .......................•:.............................:.E ATLRf�AD::.................:::.:::•. .................................................................................................................................... ....�..p.y.�.......................................................................................................................... �:a'•Z?'.�ii:rii}Fiiir}r::}iii:::i�iiri?i:}?}}:i:'.::•i:i�}i:i:?i�iiiiiii{ifif�F.i�}?:::iii�?i}iii�:::i.ii:.:iii:i.:?i:.}7}:.:i�7iF.iiiii?i:P ...................................:.... •::•:::::::::::::::::.:�:::.�::::.�:::::::.�.�::: ................... / N 88030'191,W 831.04' y3o01;,�6 1 �ti9 G a 11574 7 V6 CO,,! 13 1218 7 E FRANKLIN RD ??�+OF j9� ------ 89°32'43"W 1328.12' ------ �'.�BE NTS PROJECT: OWNER/DEVELOPER: DWG# 2030 S. WASHINGTON AVE. UNION DISTRICT EMMETT,ID 83617 120018-EX ANNEXATION EXHIBIT BILL TRUAX �� P: (208)398-8104 PROJECT# MERIDIAN,ID. F. (208)398-8105 120018 SEC, 7, T3N, R1E, B.M. 208-914-6131 S�4WMQr ADA COUNTY, IDAHO SHEET DATE: 2/2020 1-0ns5urveyinq,LLC WWW.SAWTOOTHLS.COM 1 OF 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 130 of 265 E IDIAN IDAHO 10morw PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING Agenda Item Number: 4 C Item Title: Resolution PZ-20-02: A Resolution of the Planning and Zoning Commission for the City of Meridian, Idaho, Validating Conformity of the Urban Renewal Plan for the Union District Urban Renewal Project with the city of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Meeting Notes: CiWE I� ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item -4.C. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item - Resolution No PZ-20-02. A Resolution of the Planning and Zoning Commission for the City of Meridian, Idaho, Validating Conformity of the Urban Renewal Plan for the Union District Urban Renewal Project with the City of Meridian's Comprehensive Plan ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Upload Date P & Z Resolution 20-02 with Attachments Resolution 4/9/2020 MDC Resolution 20-009 for Union District Plan Backup Material 4/9/2020 Union District Plan Backup Material 4/9/2020 attachment 1 to Union District Plan Backup Material 4/9/2020 attachment 2 to Union District Plan Backup Material 4/9/2020 Attachment 4 - Maps Backup Material 4/9/2020 Attachment 5.1 and 5.2 Backup Material 4/9/2020 Attachment 5.3 - Estimated TI F Revenue Backup Material 4/9/2020 Attachment 5.4 - Cash Flow Analysis Backup Material 4/9/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 131 of 265 RESOLUTION PZ-20-02 CITY OF MERIDIAN BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO,VALIDATING CONFORMITY OF THE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR THE UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Meridian(the "City"), Idaho, also known as Meridian Development Corporation (hereinafter"MDC"), the duly constituted and authorized urban renewal agency of the City, has submitted the proposed Urban Renewal Plan for the Union District Urban Renewal Project(the "Union District Plan")to the City; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Meridian City Council referred the Union District Plan to the City Planning and Zoning Commission for review and recommendations concerning the conformity of said Union District Plan with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended (the "Comprehensive Plan"); and WHEREAS, on April 16, 2020, the City Planning and Zoning Commission met to consider whether the Union District Plan conforms with the Comprehensive Plan as required by Idaho Code § 50-2008(b); and WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed said Union District Plan in view of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that the Union District Plan is in all respects in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That the Union District Plan, submitted by MDC and referred to this Commission by the Mayor and City Council for review, is in all respects in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Section 2. That Exhibit A, the memorandum from Caleb Hood, Planning Division Manager dated April 8, 2020 outlining the findings supporting the determination that the Union District Plan is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, is hereby adopted and incorporated as part of this Resolution. RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING,VALIDATING CONFORMITY OF THE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR THE UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN-1 of 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 132 of 265 Section 3. That the City Clerk hereby authorized and directed to provide the Mayor and Meridian City Council with a signed copy of this Resolution relating to said Union District Plan. Section 4. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 16th day of April 2020. APPROVED: ATTEST: Chair, Planning and Zoning Commission City Clerk RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING,VALIDATING CONFORMITY OF THE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR THE UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN-2 of 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 133 of 265 Mayor Robert E. Simison C� f IDIAN. City Council Members: =�� Treg Bernt brad Hoaglun Joe Borton Jessica Perreault D A H O Luke Cavener Liz Strader 0100 EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION PZ-20-02 April 9, 2020 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Robert Simison Meridian City Council Meridian Planning &Zoning Commission CC: David Miles, Chief of Staff Cameron Arial, Community Development Director Victoria Cleary, Economic Development Administrator Caleb Hood, Planning Division Manager FROM: Caleb Hood, Planning Division Manager Brian McClure, Comprehensive Associate Planner RE: Urban Renewal Plan for the Union District Urban Renewal Project This memo is intended to provide Comprehensive Plan related analysis for the proposed Urban Renewal Plan for the Union District Urban Renewal Project(Union District Plan) in downtown Meridian. Due to the current COVID-19 outbreak and associated quarantine, Staff is including analysis within this memo that otherwise would be shared and explained during the meeting. City Staff will be in virtual attendance at the April 16th Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to give a brief report and summary and to answer any questions, but does not intend to get into many details; this memo should be relied on heavily for Staff s analysis. Application of the City's Comprehensive Plan(Plan)to the proposed Union District area(see Attachment A) is very relevant. Every major theme (chapter) in the Plan ranging from economic development and land use to historic preservation and transportation contain policies that are directly applicable. Additionally, the Comprehensive Plan adopts other documents by reference, for inclusion in consideration of land use decisions and to direct staff activities. Many of the referenced documents are relevant both in geographic area and to the described implementation strategies and goals in the Union District Plan. The following analysis describes the associated text, policies, and referenced plans. EXHIBIT A TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-02 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 134 of 265 Analysis Plan Text The implementation strategies and goals stated in the Union District Plan clearly describe activities aimed at stimulating private development through the reduction of blight and the construction or community improvements. Some of the listed activities include: design and construction of infrastructure improvements; acquisition or support in rehabilitation of real property; financial assistance for business; advanced funding for development; and public- private partnership in the construction of a new Community Center. See pages 3-4 and 9-10 of the plan for how the goals of the plan will be achieved. The Evolving Community section (Chapter 3) of the City's Comprehensive Plan, defines future land use typologies. The description for Old Town, the adopted future land use in and around the project area, states: This designation includes the historic downtown and the true community center. The boundary of the Old Town district predominantly follows Meridian's historic plat boundaries. In several areas, both sides of a street were incorporated into the boundary to encourage similar uses and complimentary design of the facing houses and buildings. Sample uses include offices, retail and lodging, theatres, restaurants, and service retail for surrounding residents and visitors. A variety of residential uses are also envisioned and could include reuse of existing buildings, new construction of multi family residential over ground floor retail or office uses. The City has developed specific architectural standards for Old Town and other traditional neighborhood areas. Pedestrian amenities are emphasized in Old Town via streetscape standards. Additional public and quasi public amenities and outdoor gathering area are encouraged. Future planning in Old Town will be reviewed in accordance with Destination Downtown, a visioning document for redevelopment in Downtown Meridian. Please see Chapter 2 Premier Community for more information on Destination Downtown. Sample zoning include O-T. The Old Town future land use designation is the most diverse in the City's land use portfolio, with the greatest combined range of residential and non-residential uses and no caps on density or intensity of developed uses. Further, the City's complimentary zoning, also named Old Town (O-T), has zero setbacks for structures, relaxed parking requirements, and reduced landscape setbacks (aside from pedestrian streetscape infrastructure.) Interestingly, the Union District Plan makes numerous references to the City's planning documents dictating density and character elements,but it is Destination Downtown, developed by the Meridian Development Corporation(MDC), that dictates general uses, building mass and character, and intensity of developments. The City has adopted Destination Downtown by reference, and supports MDC's plan by adopting an eclectic and flexible future land use and zoning designation. With Destination Downtown nearing a decade of use however, existing conditions varying in several significant areas, many new stakeholders and community groups, and with the downtown urban renewal district expiring in the upcoming years, it is likely the plan is nearing the end of its relevancy. Plan Policies The following text relates to the policies found throughout the major themes in the Comprehensive Plan(Chapters 2 through 6). Not all policies must be addressed or apply to the Union District Plan, but staff has tried to include all downtown related policies below. Additional context for these policies can be found in the Related Policies section(see Attachment B), which EXHIBIT A TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-02 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 135 of 265 includes parent Goals and Objectives, for the referenced policies. Note: the first number of a policy references the Chapter in which the policy can be found. • 2.02.01E, Encourage the development of high quality, dense residential and mixed use areas near in and around Downtown, near employment, large shopping centers,public open spaces and parks, and along major transportation corridors, as shown on the Future Land Use Map. A new urban renewal district focused on infrastructure (parking, utilities, etc.)would provide the tools necessary to support and encourage redevelopment in an area of town that suffers from significant blight. • 2.02.02B, Consider incentives such as density bonuses, reduced open space requirements, and reduced fees for infill development in key areas near existing services. A new urban renewal district could provide for incentives such as infrastructure and infrastructure reimbursement through tax increment financing (TIF). • 2.02.02C, Support infill development that does not negatively impact the abutting, existing development. Infill projects in Downtown should develop at higher densities, irrespective of existing development. The Union District Plan does not address how transitions between existing and proposed redevelopment may take place, but could do so transparently as part of negotiations for partnerships with the Urban Renewal District, and through public hearing and administrative approvals with the City. Staff will review future projects for consistency with this policy. The Union District Plan addresses density increases throughout the document. • 2.02.02D, Apply appropriate design and construction standards to infill development in order to reduce adverse impacts to existing development. The Union District Plan makes specific references to establishing performance criteria and design standards in goal `i'(page 4), and duplicated under implementation letter `w' (page 11). They state: In conjunction with the City, the establishment and implementation of performance criteria to assure high site design standards and environmental quality and other design elements which provide unity and integrity to the entire Project Area, including commitment of funds for planning studies, achieving high standards of development, and leveraging such development to achieve public objectives and efficient use of scarce resources. This is critical work to be done proactively, as the City does not have any site or building design standards specific to Downtown (just general traditional neighborhood design), or for policies related to historic preservation and enhancements. NOTE:Development of design standards downtown has not been preliminarily identified as a high priority project for the City. • 2.09.01 B, Establish incentives to develop gathering spaces and civic facilities within Downtown. A new urban renewal district could provide for incentives such as gathering spaces and civic facilities, which could be reimbursed through tax increment financing(TIF). Part of the Union District Plan specifically references a public private partnership, including the City, for the construction of a community center. • 2.09.01 C, Work towards mitigating and removing floodplain issues around Downtown. There is no floodplain in this area of Downtown. EXHIBIT A TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-02 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 136 of 265 • 2.O9.O2A, Actively implement action items in the Destination Downtown Plan. Destination Downtown was created by the Meridian Development Corporation for the downtown Urban Renewal District, and adopted by the City. This plan was extremely broad in land use diversity, area, and scope. The project area for the Union District Plan is included within the Destination Downtown area, but previous efforts failed to eliminate blight that this new district seeks to address. With the existing downtown urban renewal set to expire in the coming years, this new district is an opportunity for more renewed and focused efforts, both geographically and in implementation activities. • 2.O9.O2B, Pursue grants and public-private partnerships to enhance Downtown. A new urban renewal district could both provide grants and make more competitive applications for grants, by utilizing a dedicated funding source such as tax increment financing(TIF). • 2.O9.O2C, Develop programs with local partners to expand art, cultural, and educational facilities in Downtown. There are several references to these activities and facilities throughout the Union District Plan. Art may be done both as public private partnership, or independent of development, and educational facilities are described in several areas including implementation strategies (letter `o). It should be noted that the Union District Plan describes the Urban Renewal District's ability to make decisions related to public art independent of the Meridian Arts Commission, which to date has focused a great deal of time, money, and energy in downtown. Staff recommends caution with multiple independent entities exercising self determination of overlapping activities. • 2.O9.O2D, Develop and support regular cultural activities and events Downtown, in partnership with the Downtown Business Association and other organizations. Supporting events is not described within the Union District Plan directly, but supporting the development of locations for these to occur is addressed. • 2.O9.O2F, Support a compatible mix of land uses Downtown that activate the area during day and night. Supporting specific uses at discrete times of the day is not described within the Union District Plan directly, but supporting the development of mixed-use locations,facilities, and supporting infrastructure (e.g. —parking) is discussed. • 2.O9.O2G, Implement the City of Meridian Design Standards and City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual to ensure that Downtown remains the historic center for mixed-use tourism, business, retail, residential, and governmental activities. The City has land use authority over the project area and implementation of design and architectural standards must be met. However, these standards, while allowing for these types of uses/attractions, does not necessarily cater to or encourage them. Additional work is necessary if downtown specific and historical context is desired. The Union District Plan speaks to this work under goal `i'(page 4), and duplicated under implementation letter `w' (page 11). • 2.O9.O3B, Promote Ten Mile, Downtown, and The Village as centers of activity and growth. The Union District Plan seeks to redevelop some of the most blighted property in the City, at the heart and center of the Downtown area, and which is otherwise adjacent to some of the most iconic and well used public spaces outside of traditional parks. By successfully EXHIBIT A TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-02 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 137 of 265 redeveloping this highly visible blight, Downtown will be well placed to offer and promote a dense concentration ofpublic spaces for activity use by many. • 2.09.03E, Develop concept plans of potential destination activities and promote appropriate development, infill, and redevelopment of activity centers. The Union District Plan does not address this directly, but the intention of the Plan is to support these types of activities through public private partnerships of community facilities. • 3.03.01E, Encourage infill development. The unstated purpose of the Union District Plan, through virtually all of the goals and implementation strategies, is to encourage infill development through redevelopment of blighted lands and development of community facilities through public private partnerships. • 3.03.03G, Require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks, water and sewer utilities. The City has land use authority over the project area and urban infrastructure will be required with all redevelopment. Further, the Union District Plan calls out specific implementation strategies including road, curb, gutter, streetscape, lighting, stormwater, and others throughout the document(including financial analysis). • 4.04.02A, Identify opportunities for new paths that connect residential neighborhoods and community facilities, such as the library and city hall,parks, schools, athletic facilities, swimming pools, historic districts, the Downtown, as well as other commercial and retail activity centers in Meridian. The City's Pathway Master Plan depicts several options through the project area, and will be required as part of redevelopment of the site. The Union District Plan references pathways both through goals and implementation items. • 4.05.01E, Assess environmental impact of potential new development, infill, and redevelopment. The Union District Plan specifically addresses environmental assessment of brownfield sites, and more generally towards environmental quality and creating standards to maintain environmental quality in coordination with the City (goal letter `i). Outside of floodplain impacts however, the City does not have much in the way of requirements or regulations to this end. • 5.02.01A, Maintain and implement design and building standards for historically significant buildings and resources in Old Town. There are no historically significant structures within the project area. The Union District Plan emphasizes consideration for the historic character and quality of the area. Stronger efforts by designers to this end are needed, or standards created, to protect and enhance the general area prior to design and permit approval for structures in this area, if this policy statement is a priority. It would be difficult to suggest that preliminary concepts for structures on either the Civic Block or Union Pacific property compliment or lend aid to any historic themes in the Old Town area. The bulk and mass of concept buildings could easily overwhelm and minimize other historic structures in the area without further integration of ideas and themes. EXHIBIT A TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-02 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 138 of 265 • 6.01.01 C, Improve ingress and egress opportunities for all modes of transportation in Downtown. The Union District Plan references improvements to roads, sidewalks,pathways, and a railroad crossing, as projects for implementation. Improvements to East 3rd Street specifically would greatly enhance bicycle access into downtown, and provide more options for local residents and stakeholders. • 6.O1.O2D, Consider needed sidewalk, pathway, landscaping, and lighting improvements with all land use decisions. The City has land use authority over the project area and redevelopment will be required to provide infrastructure. The Union District Plan also specifically references all of these elements as projects for implementation. • 6.O1.O2I, Pursue the extension of Idaho Ave. and/or Broadway Ave. to Commercial Dr. and the extension of East 3rd St. from Fairview Ave. to Pine Ave. in Downtown. While not directly referencing the extension of these streets,proposed implementation (improvement)projects for both Broadway Ave and East 3rd Street would go a long way in highlighting the value of these projects and encouraging their construction. • 6.O1.O2L, Work with ACHD to implement projects from the 2012 Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan. While not directly referencing coordination with ACHD on implementation of the 2012 Neighborhood Plan, improvements to East 3rd Street are directly aligned and much needed for north-south bicycle connectivity through Downtown. Neither Meridian Road nor Main Street have dedicated bike facilities, and a safe multi-modal, north-south connection is needed between existing pathway connection on Franklin near Storey Park, and on Pine near Five Mile Creek. EXHIBIT A TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-02 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 139 of 265 Referenced Plans The following plans are adopted by reference in the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan, and are relevant material to the proposed Union District Plan. • Downtown Meridian Street Cross-section Master Plan Every road within the project area is included within the Downtown Meridian Street Cross- section Master Plan. Adopted in 2014, this document includes cross-section concepts intended to work with minimal impact to available impact, while also serving multiple modes. Vibrant streetscape activity is especially important in the Old Town area, and including the Union District Project area. Connectivity both east-west and north-south through the downtown area is very important. It is particularly important that East 3rd Street incorporate a pathway element to support connectivity of the City's Pathway Master Plan through downtown, connecting Storey Park to Fairview Avenue. Traffic speeds on Meridian Road are unfriendly to pedestrian, and neither Meridian Road nor Main Street provide safe bicycle connectivity north-south, and there is no other railroad crossing within the downtown area besides East 3Yd Street. • Historic Preservation Plan The Historic Preservation Commission and City adopted this plan in 2014. With less than 2.2% of Meridian's housing stock being older than 1960's construction (2017 Existing Conditions Report), and almost all of it consolidated in the Downtown area, there is very limited opportunity for historic preservation outside of agricultural themes in the larger community. Several goals from this plan are relevant to the Union District Plan, including: o Goal I Preserve and enhance Meridian's historical, cultural and agricultural heritage. o Goal 3 Heighten public awareness of historic preservation in the community and improve preservation education efforts for various audiences. o Goal 4 Maintain and strengthen support for historic preservation from individuals, commercial property owners, local organizations and neighborhood groups. These goals for the Commission (and City) are not just about preserving, but also enhancing and generating awareness of Meridian's history. Additional objectives for these goals are described within the plan. • Meridian Rail-With-Trail Action Plan A portion of the project area includes Union Pacific right-of-way that is apart of the Boise cut-off. The Meridian Rail-With-Trail Action Plan identified an opportunity for a Treasure Valley-wide multi-use pathway. This Action Plan has since been supplemented with numerous planning efforts looking at more detailed cross-sections, street crossings, and alternatives. Meridian is actively working to construct certain portions, and part of this network must be constructed within the project area, either along the rail corridor right-of- way or integrated through site planning. EXHIBIT A TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-02 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 140 of 265 • Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan One of the projects described in the proposed Union District Plan is the development of a community center as part of the Civic Block project. Objective 4.3 of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan identifies expanded indoor recreation space as a priority for the community. Pathways are another significant element of this plan, and further emphasizes the demand for connectivity improvements to and through downtown, and the project area. • Meridian Pathways Master Plan The Pathways Master Plan identifies north-south (East 3rd Street) and east-west (Broadway/Rail with Trail)pathway connections through the project site. This plan works in concert with the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, Meridian Rail-With-Trail Action Plan, and through many of the policies in the Comprehensive Plan. • Downtown Meridian Transportation Management Plan This plan has resulted in significant roadway expansions within Meridian, including the split corridor phase I and phase 2 improvements. Two of the last projects left in the Downtown Meridian Transportation Management Plan are the East 3rd Street connection north of Carlton Ave and south of Badley Ave, and the extension of either Broadway Ave or Idaho Ave east to Commercial Ave (and ultimately to Locust Grove). These projects/connections are essential in supporting the densities necessary for the larger downtown area to be a thriving center of activity. The Union District Plan could benefit both of these streets in close proximity to the areas set for expansion. • Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan Developed by ACHD, this plan identified a number of community drive projects to enhance the pedestrian and bicycle connectivity in the area. ACHD has been diligent in programming and constructing these projects, and one of the last significant components is identified sidewalk improvements on East 3rd Street. There are sidewalk gaps in the project area and the rail crossing is unsafe and outright impassable for some with mobility disabilities. One of the projects in the Union District Plan would include street improvements to East 3rd Street near Broadway, and including the rail crossing. All of these plans are available on the City's Comprehensive Plan website at: hops://meridiancity.ora/plannin /e compplan/resources. Recommendation Based on the analysis provided in this memo, Staff believes establishing an Urban Renewal District Plan for the Union Block project to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and in the best interest of the City. Accordingly, Staff recommends that the Commission move to approve the two related Resolutions on the meeting agenda as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO,VALIDATING CONFORMITY OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MERIDIAN REVITALIZATION PLAN WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO,VALIDATING CONFORMITY OF THE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR THE UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EXHIBIT A TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-02 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 141 of 265 Attachment A: Union District Area (Urban Renewal District) Future Land Usesr—E Medium Density ResidentialIndustrialCivic Old Town1 0 Mixed Use Community E�PIf NE_AVE� 0 0 y N S ]R�N Z W N N ~ }Z ��W�Z W IDAHO AVE N E IDAHOAVE—Z //� N ��luz-HE W BROADWA�Y-AVE-AVE'M��� � W iz W ZBROADWAY AVE—OAD_S \/{�\�p[1.� a W^RAILRT_Z i W_BO.WER:ST Z �3 E BOVIIER-ST � W=W Q � OT0 i� E DA-Sr-N Legend N T T VI; Zl I 1 5,:Urban Renewal District W-TAYLOR AVE- T R 0 Parcels _T] *_E KING ST - Railroad ® I N 00 0�Feet EXHIBIT A TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-02 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 142 of 265 Attachment B: Related Policies The policies below are from the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. For policy type: G=Goal; O=Objective, and A=Action. Goals and Objectives are shown with referenced actions for additional context,along with a referenced section. ID Policy Policy Section Type G Plan for safe,attractive,and well-maintained neighborhoods that have Housing El ample open space,and generous amenities that provide varied lifestyle choices. 2.02.01 O Elevate and enhance the quality and connectivity of residential site and Housing subdivision planning. 2.02.01E A Encourage the development of high quality,dense residential and mixed use Housing areas near in and around Downtown,near employment large shopping centers,public open spaces and parks,and along major transportation corridors,as shown on the Future Land Use Map. 2.02.02 0 Maximize public services by prioritizing infill development of vacant and Housing underdeveloped parcels within the City over parcels on the fringe. 2.02.02B A Consider incentives such as density bonuses,reduced open space Housing requirements,and reduced fees for infill development in key areas near existing services. 2.02.02C A Support infill development that does not negatively impact the abutting, Housing existing development. Infill projects in Downtown should develop at higher densities,irrespective of existing development. 2.02.02D A Apply appropriate design and construction standards to infill development in Housing order to reduce adverse impacts to existing development. 2.09.00 G Create positive,vibrant,and accessible commercial activity centers within Economic the community. Excellence 2.09.01 O Support redevelopment and infill opportunities Downtown. Economic Excellence 2.09.01B A Establish incentives to develop gathering spaces and civic facilities within Economic Downtown. Excellence 2.09.01C A Work towards mitigating and removing floodplain issues around Downtown. Economic Excellence 2.09.02 O Integrate and maintain quality public spaces throughout Downtown for Economic recreation,social,and civic activities. Excellence 2.09.02A A Actively implement action items in the Destination Downtown Plan. Economic Excellence 2.09.02B A Pursue grants and public-private partnerships to enhance Downtown. Economic Excellence 2.09.02C A Develop programs with local partners to expand art cultural,and Economic educational facilities in Downtown. Excellence 2.09.02D A Develop and support regular cultural activities and events Downtown,in Economic partnership with the Downtown Business Association and other Excellence organizations. 2.09.02F A Support a compatible mix of land uses Downtown that activate the area Economic during day and night. Excellence 2.09.02G A Implement the City of Meridian Design Standards and City of Meridian Economic Architectural Standards Manual to ensure that Downtown remains the Excellence historic center for mixed-use tourism,business,retail,residential,and EXHIBIT A TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-02 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 143 of 265 governmental activities. 2.09.03 O Cultivate unique and diverse destination-type activities within Meridian's Economic centers. Excellence 2.09.03E A Promote Ten Mile,Downtown,and The Village as centers of activity and Economic growth. Excellence 2.09.03E A Develop concept plans of potential destination activities and promote Economic appropriate development,infill,and redevelopment of activity centers. Excellence 3.03.00 G Direct and prioritize development in strategic areas and in accordance with Growth and corridor and special area plans. Population 3.03.01 O Plan for an appropriate land use mix,recreational and civic facilities,and Growth and phased service extension within specific area plans and urban renewal Population districts. 3.03.01E A Encourage infill development. Growth and Population 3.03.03G A Require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments,including Growth and curb and gutter,sidewalks, water and sewer utilities. Population 4.04.00 G Develop a connected,comfortable,and comprehensive network of multi- Parks and purpose pathways. Pathways 4.04.02 0 Link pathways to important pedestrian generators,environmental features, Parks and historic landmarks,public facilities,Town Centers,and business districts. Pathways 4.04.02A A Identify opportunities for new paths that connect residential neighborhoods Parks and and community facilities,such as the library and city hall,parks,schools, Pathways athletic facilities,swimming pools,historic districts,the Downtown,as well as other commercial and retail activity centers in Meridian. 4.05.00 G Preserve,protect,enhance,and wisely use natural resources. Stewardship 4.05.01 0 Protect and enhance existing waterways,groundwater,wetlands,wildlife Stewardship habitat,air,soils,and other natural resources. 4.05.01E A Assess environmental impact of potential new development,infill,and Stewardship redevelopment. 5.02.00 G Celebrate Meridian's historical,cultural,and agricultural heritage. Historic Preservation 5.02.01 0 Enhance and restore the historical quality of Old Town. Historic Preservation 5.02.01A A Maintain and implement design and building standards for historically Historic significant buildings and resources in Old Town. Preservation 6.01.00 G Facilitate the efficient movement of people and products to and from the Transportation City. and Streets 6.01.01 0 Support multi-modal and complete-street transportation improvements. Transportation and Streets 6.01.01C A Improve ingress and egress opportunities for all modes of transportation in Transportation Downtown. and Streets 6.01.02 0 Enhance existing transportation systems. Transportation and Streets 6.01.02D A Consider needed sidewalk,pathway,landscaping,and lighting improvements Transportation with all land use decisions. and Streets 6.01.021 A Pursue the extension of Idaho Ave.and/or Broadway Ave. to Commercial Dr. Transportation and the extension of East 3rd St.from Fairview Ave. to Pine Ave.in and Streets Downtown. EXHIBIT A TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-02 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 144 of 265 L-� Policy Section 6.01.02L A Work with ACHD to implement projects from the 2012 Downtown Meridian Transportation Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan. and Streets EXHIBIT A TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-02 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 145 of 265 Attachment C: Meridian Pathways Master Plan Meridian Pathway Plan L L L L LJ L U J L L L LJ I I � r -•-•--Alternative Route -Existing Pathway � �?r Pr E STATE Street Route AVE......Proposed Pathway E:P.INE;QQVE H h W 777 e s��x z v h N W W N W �Z=Z W IDAHO AVE"' ti }? y Z E IDAHO AVE Z�Z �S z W � ' z BROADW AY AVE E BROADWAY AVE ' Q ':Q ............ TF �Ld W W z WORAILROAD°ST .__...-..... Z ............._ ............... ....+ i ■ ......... ....................................... WBO.WER:ST FFE gOV11ER-ST A 09y� y z H¢ O E ADA-ST=N Legend N ov ;Urban Renewal District W TAYLOR AVE Q� 0 Parcels �_E KING-ST } Railroad ® I I N U 250�Feet EXHIBIT A TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-02 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020- Page 146 of 265 Attachment D: Downtown Meridian Street Cross-section Master Plan Examples Main Street MAIN STREET:Ada Street to Carlton Avenue {ynwFacn9 Nadh} p I' .a Oedgn is based on edenls GY Pres nation e' 'W� .�` g:, al mdaling RBW.Mangan e .,,r edslitg a almq Parking p..Ikl lnl perking. V SidewalksIR1 oin nve r Pathway f y,t E �a �V Fe Street scape Buffer h F_ Parkway Buffer fF* Furniture F Lighting ✓Regulred.•Be,lred ri 7* Edstngedge d ROW Mddainedding arb Fees L Maiden.dump CL dread Ensting edge d ROW parki tq -Iti dWrnn � ZF'm CLd Road 26'1.Cl el Roeder 1A'Podmlrmn xdh did intended to be consistent thematic elements,and must reconfiguration.Future improvements will generally be Ada Street to Carlton avenue be carried forward appropriately as consistent entryway located behind the back ofcurb,and occur eitherthrough thematic elements forthe length of the corridor. private redevelopment and infill projects,or im provements CONSIDERATIONS: by MDC and partner agencies-Driveways and unnecessary Cross-section Width 80-feet(ROW) AO-tent Main between Ada and Carlton isatradRional downtown DESCRIPTION or ULTIMATE CONDITIONS: access points to Main should be restricted or removed Road Three laneswith Three lene,wlth'enter street lined predominately with older buildings and some The onlysignificant variation to thetypical eisting(2013) with redevelopment,particularly near alleyways. 'entertorn lane torn lane Parallel/Angled(both infill redevelopment.Restaurants and professional services street cross-section is the potential forshort center median Perking sides) Parallel(both side') are the predominatetypes of existing uses,with some gov- islands.These islands are envisioned to omurwhere traf- ernment services and a number of historic structures.The fic patterns will be minimally impacted,generally only Perking Cavasltr" NI 82 street is critical for north-south vehicular and pedestrian restricting alleys from becoming through streets,and be walkway,(ea.,lde) 6feet detaehed, B-feat detaehed.coin. connectivity,and is the primary arterial access for busi- built to provide additional aesthetic and thematic ben- ea"act ness and residential uses between Fairview and Franklin. efitsto the street environment.On-street parking should Bnfiar(aa.,lda) Vedas 8 feet per,tenderd, generally be parallel where it occurs,with angled parking Pethway None Nana INTENT: discouraged due to traffic and safety impacts,especially 8,ke Suvpvrt None SFarrows The intent ofthls cross-section into maintain and improve for bicycle users. •Parking impaotsand luture valuesare estimates.do not lndicate'mterlm connectivity,and balance the needs of both automotive —0,en,and aa'ume Tau comprmnce with moss semlen.Brlvawars,fire and pedestrian uses.Detached walkways and landscape I MPLEMENTATION PROCESS: hydrants.andvtFervvndltivne maraltarfinal count.See Parking'evtivn buffers arethetop priority,with on-street parking also In most cases the actual roadway for the Main Street cross- ender So-eet Be'Ign. being critical.Streettrees,signage,pavers,and lighting are section is already built-out with little need for roadway DOWNTOWN MERIDIAN CITY CORE STREET CROSS-SECTION MASTER PLAN STREET DESIGN ® EXHIBIT A TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-02 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 147 of 265 East 2nd Street EAST 2ND STREET: Broadway Avenue to Carlton Avenue aResipn is b...de oing Nrtoednhts y of emotions 00W}.Praraton Fe Parking es I fiY Sidewalk, F r Pathway Fe Streetscape Buffer Parkway B°Har j �. "4•„Wv vinc; Furniture __ __ - F Lighting h ✓Regnlred.0 Bashed R a n - _ 1 a L f wring edge d POW Edsling edge of ImW ld'Pedestrian :d Road 19`Pad deriae Note:See the app.odk..for alternatire cross-section designs While cross-section configu rations wkh increased parking IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: Broadway Avenue to Carlton Avenge are provided,in most conditions parking servicing local As a segment,the frequent cross-street and alley breaks CONSIDERATIONS: businesses should be consolidated off-street or located allow East 2nd to be developed more piecemeal than many Cross-section Width 80-f.WROW) 80-feet elsewhere,allowing for a more lively and dynamic pedes- other areas ofthe City Core.However,the curb-less nature East 2nd between Broadway and Carlton consists ofshort trian environment that increases area draw. ofthe identified cross-sections and resulting grade changes Road I-way No-way.curb-less block lengths with frequent cross-street and alley inter- DESCRIPTION OF ULTIMATE CONDITIONS: with new facilities will likely require improvements to be Parking Angled and parallel Anglad,parallel and sections.The only through Cross-street on this segment none made for the full width ofthe cross-section(both sides of however is Pine,with all other streets dead-ending within East 2nd is intended to be a charming traditional down- the road).It may be possible for redevelopment to occur Parking Capadty' 79 57(.ay.ary) a mile.This limited connectivity is less conducive to heavy town street that is able to cater to social shopping and in half-block increments,between a cross-street and alley, Walkway,(ea.side) and mhsd datachad, Oetaahed or bollard traffic movements and provides additional opportunities dining experiences through unique design enhancements but there is like) greater Ion term cost-savings to do a g,agm.n s. ,spar,ed.width caries. for pedestrian supportive focus and enhancement. and comfortable pedestrian spaces.While trees are kept y g g r 5-feet or lass 5-feet ram. Whole block at a time.Storm-water is an important con- Vases rain 19'whara INTENT: to provide a more pedestrian scaled and comfortable sideration.Improvements should occur as public-private Buffer W.,ida) Varies exile,A,ith walkway pedestrian environment,they are pulled further from the partnerships to generate and foster greater place-making, This street segment is unique in that the short block lengths buildings to allow for more unobstructed business and Pathway None None raise awareness,and be supportive f new businesses or Bike Se t None None and limited traffic allow for multiple cross-sections which community streetscape uses,such as outdoor dining- renovations able to make use of the facilities. pp0f while consistent in thematic and alignment,offer a vari- Cross-section options exist for medians or other special 'Parking impacts and fo uracaluas era asrnoata,do not,,dicata interim ety of configurations.Priority improvements should be street features such as topiary or artwork.See appendix and e.nma foil,enThe,e with,ro,, tion Driveway,,fir. focused on a wider pedestrian environment with emphasis hydrants,and other conditions may altar final count.See Parking seam on unique and memorable place-making configurations. andarSlreet Resign. DOWNTOWN MERIDIAN CITY CORE STREET CROSS—SECTION MASTER PLAN STREET DESIGN EXHIBIT A TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-02 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 148 of 265 East 3rd Street Franklin Road to Broadway Avenue ., {NewFaeing Nvth} �i ,� Oesign is based eastern edge d V Pres nation �, E E >..ry eAAitg ROW,bmmay vary ifeom ` sistem It,—tlouaus segmeote Fe Parking V Sidewalks ri Pathway F. Street—ii.buffer f✓ Parkway Buffer V F- hraiure W Lighting ✓Ragulred.�0enlrad .RNo >s u a Eristing edge oI ROW 27 Pedsmrimt Il Erlstiq CLnf Road(varies) 7 201m CLnl11-Rwd Alignment W'Pada M��I INTENT: ample buffers for the detached pathways and sidewalks Franklin 1.1 Bodw try Avenue The primary intent of this cross-section and any varia- are all important safety and aesthetic elements for the CONSIDERATIONS: Lion is to provide for safe and convenient north-south long-term health ofthe neighborhoods-Bulbouts should bnnn-nantlnn width 80-fset(ROW) 76 feet pedestrian connectivity between Franklin and downtown. be developed at street corners to further enhance safety East3rd between Franklin and Broadway is predominately The required ten-foot detached pathway must be on the and provide additional opportunities forlandscaping and Read Two-way Iwo-way residential in nature,but is entirely within the Transit Ori- west side of the road,which has fewer driveway conflicts additional district thematic elements. Parking Parallel Parallel ented and Cultural district(TOD).Improvements should be and opportunities for further reductions with redevelop- Parking Capacity' Vanes 51 supportive of higher density and transit supportive uses in IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: PP g y PP meat taking access from alleyways.Walkways must ed Wdkwa s lea.side) Varian.t,d t.6-feet. (,,tn ad.6-feet in. ultimate conditions,and all efforts should be made with detached,and residential appropriate lighting provided Though implementation may occurwith fragmented parcel y fragmamad gape (aant Hide) redevelopment to provide for additional enhancements to enhance safety.On-street parking should be provided, specific redevelopment,it is assumed that implementation Buffer( id) Vol- 8-foot land:raga hffe,. which capitalize on these future services.Alleyways are but angled and perpendicular configurations are heavily of the pathway will require concerted efforts on behalf ea.se .11, another important consideration with the corridor,and discouraged to ensure continuity of the pathway and to of MDC and City.The pathway is critical for accessibility, Pathway Na ran.10-feat min.(west must be adequately signed and enforced to ensure pedes- reduce back-out conflicts with through traffic. safety,and quality of life,and should be implemented in side) trian safety along the corridor.While alley use is already blocks and segments.Interim redevelopment enhance- Bike Suppo,t Na Shar,aws predominately one-way forwestbound travel,this should DESCRIPTION OF ULTIMATE CONDITIONS: ments may not require full improvements if MDC and 'P,rkingimpaet df,L,,rma:aTee.Li taa.do U.dinatemt,rim be verified and coordinated with impacted stakeholders, While Fast 3rd is not intended to serve as an entryway the City are not able to expand and maintain pathway —diti—,and ansnme foil enmpfi ne with crane sennnm Ori,t aysfira hy- and considered for access with redevelopment. corridor,it is important for connectivity into the down- components,but redevelopment must make allowances dram,and other ennd'ri—may alte,finalceam.See Parking—ti.node, town area and should be inviting.Tree lined streets with for future installation. Street Oe r, MCA DOWNTOWN MERIDIAN I CITY CORE STREET CROSS—SECTION MASTER PLAN STREET DESIGN EXHIBIT A TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-02 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 149 of 265 Broadway Avenue to Carlton Avenue m (Yew Facing North) ' G Bosign is based m easiem edge d r✓ Preser.au,n <rv .A.ing ROW,hm to eeynmm I. Parking ",, v — simem krmmimms segmems r✓ Sidewalks - ^ :In-1E F Pathway I. Street—pe Buffer ri Parkway buffer y r Fnrmtar, F Lighting 'C ✓R, d.�0esired m quir .R ❑��II Edmiog edged ROW 22'Pdam-Idm 17m Edmin CLd Rmd(eaeim) R' 2I'I,1L flI wRoad Ni _.I Whdmttien A tion south of the tracks,and to help improve pedestrian and provide additional opportunities for landscaping and Broadway Avenue to Carlton Avenue connectivity with urban uses to the west.Walkways must additional district thematic elements. IF be detached by landscape buffers with large canopy trees, CONSIDERATIONS: IM and residential appropriate lighting must be provided to PLEMENTATION PROCESS: Cross-se nylon Width 8n-f,et(ROW) 76-feet Though East 3rd between Broadway and Carlton is pre- enhance safety.On-street parking should be provided, Though implementation may occurwith fragmented parcel Road Iw,wa, Iwo-way dom irately residential in nature,it is adjacent to three but angled and perpendicular configurations are heavilyspecific redevelopment,it is assumed that implementa- Parking Parallol Pardo]different commercial districts including the Northern discouraged to ensure continuity ofthe pathway and to tion of the pathway will require more concerted efforts Parking Cgadty' 63 64 Gateway,Washington&Main,and Traditional City Core reduce back outconflicts with through traffic.All rede- on behalf of MDC and the City.Interim redevelopment M.Ikwars attaohad d u B-faet. Bataohad.6-fear min, districts.While efforts should be made to enhance district velopment must be considerate to and supportive ofthe enhancements may not require full improvements if the frag„mod gaps (oast side) identities,With the proximity to the commercial districts, residential nature of this corridor segment. City is not able to expand and maintain pathway com- 8-fact landsoaPo baron, opportunities existto blend boundaries for uses supportive ponents,but redevelopment must make allowances for B,Ifer(aa.sld,) Yari,s ,I. of the overall Destination Downtown vision plan. future installation. P.thwa No Yes.IB-foet,io:(rest DESCRIPTION OF ULTIMATE CONDITIONS: While East 3rd is not intended to serve as an entryway r side) INTENT: corridor,it is importantfor connectivity into the downtown Bika Support No ;harrows The primary intent ofthis cross-section and anyvariation is area and should be inviting.The tree lined streets with 'Parking i,pact:and fatnro.alu,s ara e,at.,do not mdiaato don. to provide for a safe and convenient north-south pathway ample buffers for the detached pathways and sidewalks oonditi......doss,,,fml,,,plians,wither..s...ri-O,i..w.y,.flr,hy- connectionbetweenCarltonandBroadway.The required are all important safety and aesthetic elements for the dre ta.a ad,thar o,nditl,ns,ay sits final o,,t.Sao Parking...uon,nder ten-foot detached pathway must be on the west-side ofthe long-term health ofthe neighborhoods.Bulb-outs should So-aet Basig". road to maintain alignment With the pathway configure- be developed at street corners to further enhance safety DOWNTOWN MERIDIAN I CITY CORE STREET CROSS-SECTION MASTER PLAN STREET DESIGN EXHIBIT A TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-02 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 150 of 265 Broadway Ave BROADWAYAVENUE: Main Street to East 2nd Street hROW Earn} Oevgn's based ROW on elsnp f✓ Preservation A, e�h nuaharn edge Fe Parking 2 m SidewalksNnvE I. Pa hway flevf Y r Streetscape MN, t r Parkway Hooey Furniture 'r'4�v Fo lighting E F F Emitimihips4ROW no,s sT 20'tn Ixu inRCL d Road(varies) 201n CL d IlmRaed 27Pedulnen should reflect this.While the ten-foot multi-use pathway alignments across intersections,and to reduce setback Main street to East 2nd street is required on the south-side of the street,it's possible impacts to neighboring properties and buildings. that future pathway connectivity may be integrated with CONSIDERATIONS: redevelopment,and the pathway pulled within the adfa- IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: Cross-s a cllen Width 79-feet(ROW) 84.5-(eat Broadway between Main and East 2nd is generally indus- cent property.On-street parking and standard streetscape Curb line changes necessaryto be supportiveof pedestrian Road I-way I-way trial storage on the southern side of the roadway,along to improvements are required,and must align and integrate activities and allow businesses greater street presence will Parkmg angled Parallel the railroad tracks,and dominated by older buildings in with improvements to the east and west. likely require improvements to occur for the full length Parking Capacity' 31 IS disrepair on the northern side.Sidewalk facilities are also in of the block,on one or both sides of the roadway.Unless oetachad.4 ro 5-fail disrepair,and non-existent on the south.The streetscape DESCRIPTION OF ULTIMATE CONDITIONS: large scale redevelopment occurs,public participation will Walkways(a a silo) north side.none cn Oetachad.5-feet(hin) on the north-side of Broadway has been redeveloped on The north-side of this cross-section includes standard be necessary for implementation and play a large role in south side, the corridor segments both to the west and east—only required streetscape improvements,and a wider walkway redevelopment of the streetscape,particularly with the Wier W.side) Varna: 8-feet perctandardc this segment is lacking improvements. consistent with other corridor improvements to the east. multi-use pathway.With eventual removal of existing angled pathway None Ye: The south-side of the street provides the required path- parking,it is expected that additional off-street surface or Bike Seppt,t Nona None INTENT: way connection,but may simply mirror improvements on garage parking will need to be provided elsewhereto offset Future improvements will need to support mixed use the north-side,or'ust meet streetscape standards if the loss and accommodate future downtown parking needs 'Parking impacts and Pomre rime:era Rh,r esdo net Indicate interim P PP 1 P P 9 oonditlons.and assume full eompllanoe with cross sestlon.0rivaways,Orehy- development and balance the pedestrian environmentwith pathway is integrated into future development through the Improvements on the north-side of the roadway should drams.and other condemns mar altar final court.Si.Parkmg eeceon coder parking provisions.It is expected that future redevelop- southern properties.Parallel parking is provided instead be focus to compliment Idaho and increase demand for Street 0esige. ment on both sides of the road will be transit supportive of angled to enhance safety and create a more pedestrian land to the south. higherdensity In ixed uses,and the pedestrian environment friendly corridor,and to lim it wider cross-sections,maintain DOWNTOWN MERIDIAN I CITY CORE STREET CROSS-SECTION MASTER PLAN STREET DESIGN EXHIBIT A TO P&Z RESOLUTION 20-02 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 151 of 265 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 20-009 BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, A/K/A THE MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, ALSO KNOWN AS THE MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, RECOMMENDING AND ADOPTING THE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR THE UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT, WHICH PLAN INCLUDES REVENUE ALLOCATION FINANCING PROVISIONS; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CHAIR OR VICE-CHAIR OF THE AGENCY, OR THE AGENCY ADMINISTRATOR, TO TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE AGENCY ADMINISTRATOR AND SECRETARY OF THE AGENCY TO MAKE CERTAIN TECHNICAL CHANGES; PROVIDING FOR THIS RESOLUTION TO BE EFFECTIVE UPON ITS PASSAGE AND APPROVAL; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THIS RESOLUTION, made on the date hereinafter set forth by the Urban Renewal Agency of Meridian, Idaho, also known as the Meridian Development Corporation, an independent public body, corporate and politic, authorized under the authority of the Idaho Urban Renewal Law of 1965, Chapter 20, Title 50, Idaho Code, as amended (the "Law"), and the Local Economic Development Act, Chapter 29, Title 50, Idaho Code, as amended (the "Act'), a duly created and functioning urban renewal agency for Meridian, Idaho, hereinafter referred to as the "MDC." WHEREAS, on July 24, 2001, the City Council (the "City Council") of the City of Meridian, Idaho (the "City"), adopted Resolution No. 01-367 establishing MDC; WHEREAS, on October 8, 2002, the City Council, after notice duly published, conducted a public hearing on the Meridian Revitalization Plan Urban Renewal Project, which is also referred to as the Downtown District (the "Downtown District Plan"); WHEREAS, following said public hearing, the City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 02-987 on December 3, 2002, approving the Downtown District Plan and making certain findings; RESOLUTION NO. 20-eJ - 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 152 of 265 WHEREAS, on June 14, 2016, the City Council, after notice duly published, conducted a public hearing on The Ten Mile Road Urban Renewal Plan (the "Ten Mile Plan"). The public hearing was continued to June 21, 2016, for further testimony; WHEREAS, following said public hearing, the City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 16-1695 on June 21, 2016, approving the Ten Mile Plan and making certain findings; WHEREAS, the Downtown District Plan and the Ten Mile Plan and their project areas are referred to as the Existing Project Areas; WHEREAS, pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-2008, an urban renewal project may not be planned or initiated unless the local governing body has, by resolution, determined such area to be a deteriorated area or deteriorating area, or combination thereof, and designated such area as appropriate for an urban renewal project; WHEREAS, Idaho Code § 50-2906, also requires that in order to adopt an urban renewal plan containing a revenue allocation financing provision, the local governing body must make a finding or determination that the area included in such plan is a deteriorated area or deteriorating area; WHEREAS, based on inquiries and information presented by certain interested parties and property owners, MDC commenced certain discussions concerning examination of an area as appropriate for an urban renewal project; WHEREAS, in 2019, Kushlan I Associates and SMR Development, LLC commenced an eligibility study and preparation of an eligibility report for an area about 16 acres in size and currently located within the boundaries of the Downtown District Plan, which area is currently the subject of a plan amendment to the Downtown District Plan to de-annex the proposed area. The area is generally east of Main Street, south of Idaho Avenue, west of E. 3rd Street, and north of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way. The eligibility study area is commonly referred to as the Union District area; WHEREAS, MDC obtained the Union District Urban Renewal District Eligibility Report, dated February 2020 (the "Report"), which examined the Union District Area for the purpose of determining whether such area was a deteriorating area and/or a deteriorated area as defined by Idaho Code Sections 50-2018(9) and 50-2903(8); WHEREAS, pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 50-2018(9) and 50-2903(8), which define a deteriorating area and a deteriorated area, many of the conditions necessary to be present in such an area are found in the Union District Area; WHEREAS, the effects of the listed conditions cited in the Report result in economic underdevelopment of the area, substantially impairs or arrests the sound RESOLUTION NO. 20- . 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 153 of 265 growth of a municipality, constitutes an economic or social liability, and is a menace to the public heath, safety, morals, or welfare in tis present condition or use; WHEREAS, the MDC Board, on February 26, 2020, adopted Resolution No. 20- 003 accepting the Report and authorized the MDC Chair, Vice-Chair or Administrator to transmit the Report to the City Council requesting its consideration for designation of an urban renewal area and requesting the City Council to direct MDC to prepare an urban renewal plan for the Union District Area, which plan may include a revenue allocation area as allowed by the Act; WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 20-2188, dated March 10, 2020, declared the Union District Area described in the Report to be a deteriorated area or a deteriorating area as defined by Chapters 20 and 29 of Title 50, Idaho Code, as amended, that such area is appropriate for an urban renewal project and directed MDC to commence preparation of an urban renewal plan for the area designated; WHEREAS, MDC has embarked on an urban renewal project referred to as the Urban Renewal Plan for the Union District Urban Renewal Project ("Union District Plan") to redevelop a portion of the City, pursuant to the Law and the Act, as amended; WHEREAS, the Union District Plan proposes to create an urban renewal area commonly known as the Union District Project Area, which area is shown on the Project Area and Revenue Allocation Boundary Map and generally described in the Description of the Project Area and Revenue Allocation Area, which are attached to the Union District Plan as Attachments 1 and 2 respectively. The Union District Project Area includes area to be deannexed from the Downtown District Plan, to be amended by the First Amendment to the Meridian Revitalization Plan; WHEREAS, in order to implement the provisions of the Act and the Law either MDC may prepare a plan, or any person, public or private, may submit such plan to MDC; WHEREAS, MDC and interested property owners, developers and consultants have prepared the proposed Union District Plan for the area previously designated as eligible for urban renewal planning; WHEREAS, the Act authorizes MDC to adopt revenue allocation financing provisions as part of an urban renewal plan; WHEREAS, the Union District Plan also contains provisions of revenue allocation financing as allowed by the Act; WHEREAS, in order to implement the provisions of the Law and the Act, MDC shall prepare and adopt the Union District Plan and submit the Union District Plan and recommendation for approval thereof to the City; RESOLUTION NO. 20- - 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 154 of 265 WHEREAS, as required by the Law and the Act, MDC has reviewed the information within the Union District Plan concerning the use of revenue allocation funds and approved such information and considered the Union District Plan at its meeting on March 25, 2020; WHEREAS, the MDC Board, at several MDC Board meetings during 2020, has considered public improvements related to the Union District Project Area; WHEREAS, the Union District Plan will be tendered to the Planning and Zoning Commission and to the City for their consideration and review as required by the Law and the Act; WHEREAS, under the Act, the Union District Plan shall include with specificity the following: (1) a statement describing the total assessed valuation of the base assessment roll of the revenue allocation area and the total assessed valuation of all taxable property within the municipality; (2) a statement listing the kind, number, and location of all proposed public works or improvements within the revenue allocation area; (3) an economic feasibility study; (4) a detailed list of estimated project costs; (5) a fiscal impact statement showing the impact of the revenue allocation area, both until and after the bonds are repaid, upon all taxing districts levying taxes upon property in the revenue allocation area; and (6) a description of the methods of financing all estimated project costs and the time when related costs or monetary obligations are to be incurred; (7) a termination date for the plan and the revenue allocation area as provided for in Idaho Code § 50-2903(20); and (8) a description of the disposition or retention of any assets of the agency upon the termination date; WHEREAS, it is necessary and in the best interests of the citizens of the City to recommend approval of the Union District Plan and to adopt, as part of the Union District Plan, revenue allocation financing provisions that will help finance urban renewal projects to be completed in accordance with the Union District Plan in order to (1) encourage private development in the urban renewal area; (2) to prevent and arrest decay of the Union District Project Area due to the inability of existing financing methods to provide needed public improvements; (3) to encourage taxing districts to cooperate in the allocation of future tax revenues arising in the Union District Project Area in order to facilitate the long-term growth of their common tax base; (4) to encourage the long-term growth of their common tax base; (5) to encourage private investment within the City and (6) to further the public purposes of MDC; WHEREAS, the MDC Board finds that the equalized assessed valuation of the taxable property in the revenue allocation area described in Attachments 1 and 2 of the Union District Plan is likely to increase as a result of initiation of urban renewal projects in accordance with the Union District Plan; RESOLUTION NO. 20- - 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 155 of 265 WHEREAS, under the Law and Act, any such plan should provide for (1) a feasible method for the location of families who will be displaced from the urban renewal area in decent, safe and sanitary dwelling accommodations within their means and without undue hardship to such families; (2) the urban renewal plan should conform to the general plan of the municipality as a whole; (3) the urban renewal plan should give due consideration to the provision of adequate park and recreational areas and facilities that may be desirable for neighborhood improvement, with special consideration for the health, safety and welfare of the children residing in the general vicinity of the site covered by the plan; and (4) the urban renewal plan should afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the municipality as a whole, for the rehabilitation or redevelopment of the urban renewal area by private enterprise; WHEREAS, if the urban renewal area consists of an area of open land to be acquired by the urban renewal agency, such area shall not be so acquired unless (1) if it is to be developed for residential uses, the local governing body shall determine that a shortage of housing of sound standards and design which is decent, safe and sanitary exists in the municipality; that the need for housing accommodations has been or will be increased as a result of the clearance of slums in other areas; that the conditions of blight in the area and the shortage of decent, safe and sanitary housing cause or contribute to an increase in and spread of disease and crime and constitute a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare; and that the acquisition of the area for residential uses is an integral part of and essential to the program of the municipality, or (2) if it is to be developed for nonresidential uses, the local governing body shall determine that such nonresidential uses are necessary and appropriate to facilitate the proper growth and development of the community in accordance with sound planning standards and local community objectives, which acquisition may require the exercise of governmental action, as provided in this act, because of defective or unusual conditions of title, diversity of ownership, tax delinquency, improper subdivisions, outmoded street patterns, deterioration of site, economic disuse, unsuitable topography or faulty lot layouts, the need for the correlation of the area with other areas of a municipality by streets and modern traffic requirements, or any combination of such factors or other conditions which retard development of the area; WHEREAS, the base assessment roll of the proposed Union District Project Area, together with the base assessment roll values of the Existing Project Areas, cannot exceed ten percent (10%) of the current assessed values of all the taxable property in the City; WHEREAS, the MDC Administrator and consultants recommend the MDC Board accept the Union District Plan and forward it to the City Council; WHEREAS, the MDC Board finds it in the best interests of MDC and the public to formally adopt the Union District Plan, as set forth in Exhibit 1 attached hereto, and to forward it to the Mayor and City Council, and recommend its adoption, subject to certain conditions. RESOLUTION NO. 20- - 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 156 of 265 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above statements are true and correct. Section 2. It is hereby found and determined that the Union District Project Area as defined in the Union District Plan is a deteriorated area or a deteriorating area as defined in the Law and the Act and qualifies as an eligible urban renewal area under the Law. Section 3. That MDC specifically adopts the Union District Plan along with any changes discussed at the March 25, 2020, MDC Board meeting, including but not limited to confirmation of levy rates, impacted taxing districts, updated list of projects, estimated location or siting of improvements, updated map or legal description, or other attachments, and any modifications to the financial analysis previously prepared by consultants, Kushlan I Associates and SMR Development, LLC. Section 4. That MDC recommends that the Union District Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1, and incorporated herein by reference, be adopted by the City Council, including those sections, modifications, or text, or replacement of attachments as discussed at the March 25, 2020, MDC Board meeting. Section 5. That this Resolution constitutes the necessary action of MDC under the Act, Idaho Code § 50-2905, recommending approval by the City Council and that the Union District Plan includes with specificity the following: (1) a statement describing the total assessed valuation of the base assessment roll of the revenue allocation area and the total assessed valuation of all taxable property within the municipality; (2) a statement listing the kind, number, and location of all proposed public works or improvements within the revenue allocation area; (3) an economic feasibility study; (4) a detailed list of estimated project costs; (5) a fiscal impact statement showing the impact of the revenue allocation area, both until and after the bonds are repaid, upon all taxing districts levying taxes upon property in the revenue allocation area; and (6) a description of the methods of financing all estimated project costs and the time when related costs or monetary obligations are to be incurred; (7) a termination date for the plan and the revenue allocation area as provided for in Idaho Code § 50-2903(20); and (8) a description of the disposition or retention of any assets of the agency upon the termination date. Section 6. It is hereby found and determined that: {a} The Union District Plan gives due consideration to the provision of adequate park and recreation areas and facilities that may be desirable for neighborhood improvement (recognizing the RESOLUTION NO. 20- - 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 157 of 265 commercial and mixed-use components of the Union District Plan and the need for public improvements), and shows consideration for the health, safety, and welfare of any residents or businesses in the general vicinity of the Union District Project Area covered by the Union District Plan. (b) The Union District Plan affords maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the rehabilitation, development and redevelopment of the Project Area by private enterprises. (r:; The Union District Plan provides a feasible method for relocation of any displaced families residing within the Union District Project Area. (6) The portion of the Union District Project Area which is identified for residential uses is necessary and appropriate as there is a shortage of housing of sound standards and design which is decent, safe and sanitary in the City; that the need for housing accommodations has been or will be increased as a result of the clearance of slums in other areas; that the conditions of blight in the area and the shortage of decent, safe and sanitary housing cause or contribute to an increase in and spread of disease and crime and constitute a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare; and that the acquisition of the area of residential uses is an integral part of and essential to the program of the City. f e) The portion of the Union District Project Area which is identified for non-residential uses is necessary and appropriate to facilitate the proper growth and development standards in accordance with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan to overcome economic disuse, the need for improved traffic patterns and the need for the correlation of this area with other areas of the City. (f) The base assessment roll of the proposed Union District Project Area, together with the base assessment roll values of the Existing Project Areas, do not exceed ten percent (10%) of the current assessed values of all the taxable property in the City. (g) The Union District Plan includes a revenue allocation provision and MDC has determined that the equalized assessed valuation of the revenue allocation area will likely increase as the result of the initiation of an urban renewal project. RESOLUTION NO. 20- i Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 158 of 265 Section 7. That this Resolution constitutes the necessary action of MDC under the Law, Section 50-2008, Idaho Code and the Act. Section 8. The Chair, Vice-Chair, or Administrator and the Secretary of MDC are hereby authorized and directed to take all steps necessary and convenient to submit the proposed Union District Plan for approval by the City Council, including but not limited to the preparation of the notice of public hearing on adoption of the revenue allocation financing provisions by the City and submittal of the Union District Plan to the various taxing entities as required by Idaho Code § 50-2906. Section 9. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Meridian, Idaho, also known as the Meridian Development Corporation, on March 25, 2020. Signed by the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners and attested by the Secretary to the Board of Commissioners, on March 25, 2020. APPROVED: By. Z X Chair of the Board ATTEST: '01�_ -'&I Secre 4832-1165-1255, v. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 20- - 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 159 of 265 URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR THE UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MERIDIAN URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY (also known as Meridian Development Corporation) CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO Ordinance No. Adopted Effective Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 160 of 265 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 100 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 101 General Procedures of the Agency .........................................................................4 102 Procedures Necessary to Meet State and Local Requirements: Conformance with Idaho Code Sections 50-2008 and 50-2906............................................................ 5 103 History and Current Conditions of the Area........................................................... 5 104 Purpose of Activities............................................................................................... 7 200 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AREA............................................................................... 9 300 PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT ACTIONS.................................................................. 9 301 General.................................................................................................................... 9 302 Urban Renewal Plan Objectives ........................................................................... 12 303 Participation Opportunities and Participation Agreements................................... 13 304 Cooperation with Public Bodies ........................................................................... 15 305 Property Acquisition............................................................................................. 16 305.1 Real Property 16 305.2 Personal Property...................................................................................... 17 306 Property Management.......................................................................................... 17 307 Relocation of Persons (Including Individuals and Families), Business Concerns, and Others Displaced by the Project..................................................................... 17 308 Demolition, Clearance and Site Preparation......................................................... 18 309 Property Disposition and Development................................................................ 18 309.1. Disposition by the Agency........................................................................ 18 309.2 Disposition and Development Agreements .............................................. 19 309.3. Development by the Agency..................................................................... 20 310 Development Plans ...............................................................................................21 311 Personal Property Disposition.............................................................................. 21 312 Participation with Others......................................................................................21 313 Conforming Owners..............................................................................................22 314 Arts and Cultural Funding ....................................................................................22 400 USES PERMITTED IN THE PROJECT AREA..............................................................22 401 Designated Land Uses...........................................................................................22 402 Public Rights-of-Way...........................................................................................22 403 Other Public, Semi-Public, Institutional, and Nonprofit Uses.............................23 404 Interim Uses..........................................................................................................23 405 Development in the Project Area Subject to the Plan...........................................23 406 Construction Shall Comply with Applicable Federal, State, and Local Laws and Ordinances and Agency Development Standards.................................................24 407 Minor Variations................................................................................................... 24 408 Design for Development under a Disposition and Development Agreement or Owner Participation Agreement ........................................................................... 24 409 Nonconforming Uses............................................................................................ 25 i Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 161 of 265 500 METHODS OF FINANCING THE PROJECT ............................................................... 26 501 General Description of the Proposed Financing Methods....................................26 502 Revenue Allocation Financing Provisions............................................................ 26 502.1 Economic Feasibility Study......................................................................27 502.2 Assumptions and Conditions/Economic Feasibility Statement................ 28 502.3 Ten Percent Limitation.............................................................................29 502.4 Financial Limitation..................................................................................29 502.5 Participation with Local Improvement Districts and Business Improvement Districts .............................................................................. 31 502.6 Issuance of Debt and Debt Limitation...................................................... 31 502.7 Impact on Other Taxing Districts and Levy Rate..................................... 31 503 Lease Revenue, Parking Revenue, and Bonds...................................................... 33 504 Membership Dues and Support of Community Economic Development............ 34 600 ACTIONS BY THE CITY AND OTHER PUBLIC ENTITIES...................................... 34 601 Maintenance of Public Improvements.................................................................. 35 700 ENFORCEMENT............................................................................................................. 36 800 DURATION OF THIS PLAN, TERMINATION, AND ASSET REVIEW.................... 36 900 PROCEDURE FOR AMENDMENT OR MODIFICATION.......................................... 37 1000 SEVERABILITY.............................................................................................................. 38 1100 ANNUAL REPORT AND OTHER REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.......................... 38 1200 APPENDICES, ATTACHMENTS, EXHIBITS, TABLES............................................. 38 ii Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 162 of 265 Attachments Attachment 1 Boundary Map of Union District Urban Renewal Project Area and Revenue Allocation Area Attachment 2 Legal Description of Union District Urban Renewal Project Area and Revenue Allocation Area Attachment 3 Properties Which May be Acquired by the Agency Attachment 4 Map Depicting Expected Land Uses and Current Zoning Map of the Project Area Attachment 5 Economic Feasibility Study iii Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 163 of 265 100 INTRODUCTION This is the Urban Renewal Plan(the "Plan") for the Union District Urban Renewal Project(the "Project") in the city of Meridian(the "City"), county of Ada, state of Idaho. Attachments 1 through 5 attached hereto (collectively, the"Plan Attachments") are incorporated herein and shall be considered a part of this Plan. The term"Project" is used herein to describe the overall activities defined in this Plan and conforms to the statutory definition of an urban renewal project. Reference is specifically made to Idaho Code §§ 50-2018(10) and 50-2903(13) for the various activities contemplated by the term"Project." Such activities include both private and public development of property within the urban renewal area. The term "Project" is not meant to refer to a specific activity or development scheme. The Union District Project Area is also referred to as the "Project Area." This Plan was prepared by the Board of Commissioners (the "Agency Board") of the Meridian Urban Renewal Agency, also known as Meridian Development Corporation(the "Agency"), its consultants and staff and reviewed and recommended by the Agency pursuant to the Idaho Urban Renewal Law of 1965, Chapter 20, Title 50, Idaho Code, as amended(the "Law"), the Local Economic Development Act, Chapter 29, Title 50, Idaho Code, as amended (the "Act"), and all applicable local laws and ordinances. Idaho Code § 50-2905 identifies what information the Plan must include with specificity as follows: (1) A statement describing the total assessed valuation of the base assessment roll of the revenue allocation area and the total assessed valuation of all taxable property within the municipality; (2) A statement listing the kind, number, and location of all proposed public works or improvements within the revenue allocation area; (3) An economic feasibility study; (4) A detailed list of estimated project costs; (5) A fiscal impact statement showing the impact of the revenue allocation area, both until and after the bonds are repaid, upon all taxing districts levying taxes upon property on the revenue allocation area; (6) A description of the methods of financing all estimated project costs and the time when related costs or monetary obligations are to be incurred; (7) A termination date for the plan and the revenue allocation area as provided for in section 50-2903(20), Idaho Code. In determining the termination date, the plan shall recognize that the agency shall receive allocation of revenues in the calendar 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 164 of 265 year following the last year of the revenue allocation provision described in the urban renewal plan; and (8) A description of the disposition or retention of any assets of the agency upon the termination date. Provided however, nothing herein shall prevent the agency from retaining assets or revenues generated from such assets as long as the agency shall have resources other than revenue allocation funds to operate and manage such assets. This Plan includes the above information with specificity. The proposed redevelopment of the Project Area as described in this Plan conforms to the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan(the "Comprehensive Plan"), adopted by the Meridian City Council (the "City Council") on December 17, 2019, by Resolution No. 19-2179. The Agency intends to rely heavily on the City's applicable zoning and design standards. This Plan is subject to the Plan modification limitations and reporting requirements set forth in Idaho Code § 50-2903A. Subject to limited exceptions as set forth in Idaho Code § 50-2903A, if this Plan is modified by City Council ordinance,then the base value for the year immediately following the year in which modification occurs shall include the current year's equalized assessed value of the taxable property in the revenue allocation area, effectively eliminating the Agency's revenue stream. Should the Agency have any outstanding financial obligations,the City shall not adopt an ordinance modifying this Plan unless modification is deemed to have not occurred as provided in Idaho Code § 50- 2903A(1)(a)(i)-(iv) and written consent has been obtained by any creditors,including but not limited to lending institutions and developers who have entered into reimbursement agreements with the Agency. A modification shall not be deemed to occur when "[t]here is a plan amendment to support growth of an existing commercial or industrial project in an existing revenue allocation area . . . ." Idaho Code § 50-2903A(1)(a)(iv). The proposed development of the Project Area is primarily a commercial and/or industrial project. Any adjustment to the list of improvements and/or revenue stream to support growth of the proposed commercial and/or industrial project is not a modification under Idaho Code § 50-2903A. Further, a modification shall not be deemed to occur when "[t]here is a plan amendment to make technical or ministerial changes to a plan that does not involve an increase in the use of revenues allocated to the agency." Idaho Code § 50-2903A(1)(a)(i). Annual adjustments as more specifically set forth in the Agency's annual budget will be required to account for more/less estimated revenue and prioritization of projects. Any adjustments for these stated purposes are technical and ministerial and are not modifications under Idaho Code § 50-2903A. This Plan provides the Agency with powers, duties, and obligations to implement and further the program generally formulated in this Plan for the redevelopment, rehabilitation, and 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 165 of 265 revitalization of the area within the boundaries of the Project Area. The Agency retains all powers allowed by the Law and Act. This Plan presents a process and a basic framework within which plan implementation, including contracts, agreements and ancillary documents will be presented and by which tools are provided to the Agency to fashion, develop, and proceed with plan implementation. The Plan has balanced the need for flexibility over the twenty(20)-year timeframe of the Plan to implement the improvements identified in Attachment 5, with the need for specificity as required by Idaho Code § 50-2905. The Plan narrative addresses the required elements of a plan set forth in Idaho Code § 50-2905(1), (5), (7) and (8). Attachment 5, together with the Plan narrative, meets the specificity requirement for the required plan elements set forth in Idaho Code § 50-2905(2)-(6), recognizing that actual Agency expenditures are prioritized each fiscal year during the required annual budgeting process. Allowed projects are those activities which comply with the Law and the Act and meet the overall objectives of this Plan. The public-private relationship is crucial in the successful development and redevelopment of the Project Area. Typically, the public will fund enhanced public improvements like utilities, streets, and sidewalks which, in turn, establish the necessary infrastructure to support adjacent private investment, which in this case includes industrial and commercial facilities. The purposes of the Law and Act will be attained through, and the major goals of this Plan, are: a. The installation and construction of public improvements, improvements to existing roadways and intersections, including the installation of traffic signals; installation of curbs, gutters and streetscapes, which for purposes of this Plan, the term"streetscapes" includes sidewalks, lighting, landscaping, benches, bike racks, public art and similar amenities between the curb and right of way line; installation and/or improvements to fiber optic facilities; improvements to public utilities including water and sewer improvements, and fire protection systems; removal, burying, or relocation of overhead utilities; extension of electrical distribution lines and transformers; improvement of irrigation and drainage ditches and laterals; and improvement of storm drainage facilities; b. The planning, design and construction of a community center, useable public gathering space and a public structured parking facility or facilities; C. The planning, design and construction of a private development multi-purpose commercial and residential facility, and a public surface parking lot; d. The replanning, redesign, and development of undeveloped or underdeveloped areas which are stagnant or improperly utilized because of unusual conditions of title,underserved utilities, and other site conditions; 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 166 of 265 C. The strengthening of the economic base of the Project Area and the community by the installation of needed public improvements to stimulate new private development providing employment and economic growth; f. The provision of adequate land for open space, street rights-of-way and pedestrian rights-of-way, including pathways; g. The reconstruction and improvement of street corridors to allow traffic flows to move through the Project Area along with the accompanying utility connections, through the Project Area; h. The provision of public service utilities, which are necessary to the development of the Project Area, such as water system improvements, sewer system improvements and improvements to storm drainage facilities; i. In conjunction with the City, the establishment and implementation of performance criteria to assure high site design standards and environmental quality and other design elements which provide unity and integrity to the entire Project Area, including commitment of funds for planning studies, achieving high standards of development, and leveraging such development to achieve public objectives and efficient use of scarce resources; j. The strengthening of the tax base by encouraging private development, thus increasing the assessed valuation of properties within the Project Area as a whole and benefiting the various taxing districts in which the urban renewal area is located; and k. The funding of necessary public infrastructure to accommodate both public and private development. 101 General Procedures of the Agency The Agency is a public body, corporate and politic, as defined and described under the Law and the Act. The Agency is also governed by its bylaws as authorized by the Law and adopted by the Agency. Under the Law, the Agency is governed by the Idaho open meeting law, the Public Records Act and the Ethics in Government Act of 2015, Chapters 1, 2 and 4 of Title 74, Idaho Code; reporting requirements pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-450B, 67-450E, 50-2903A and 50-2913; and the competitive bidding requirements under Chapter 28, Title 67, Idaho Code, as well as other procurement or other public improvement delivery methods. Subject to limited exceptions, the Agency shall conduct all meetings in open session and allow meaningful public input as mandated by the issue considered or by any statutory or regulatory provision. 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 167 of 265 The Agency may adopt separate policy statements. Any modification to any policy statement is a technical or ministerial adjustment and is not a modification to this Plan under Idaho Code § 50-2903A. 102 Procedures Necessary to Meet State and Local Requirements: Conformance with Idaho Code Sections 50-2008 and 50-2906 Idaho law requires that the City Council,by resolution, must determine a geographic area be a deteriorated area or a deteriorating area, or a combination thereof, and designate such area as appropriate for an urban renewal project prior to preparation of an urban renewal plan. A consultant was retained to study a proposed project area and prepare an eligibility report. The area studied was originally reviewed for eligibility in 2001, and was deannexed from the boundaries of the existing Meridian Revitalization Plan Urban Renewal Project, adopted by City Council Ordinance No. 02-987, on December 3, 2002 (the "Downtown District Plan"),by the First Amendment to the Downtown District Plan, adopted by City Council Ordinance No. on 2020. The eligibility report was submitted to the Agency. The Agency accepted the eligibility report by Agency Resolution No. 20-003 on February 26, 2020, and thereafter submitted the eligibility report to the City Council for its consideration. The area studied was deemed by the City Council to be a deteriorating area and/or a deteriorated area and therefore eligible for an urban renewal project by adoption of Resolution No. 20-2188 on March 10, 2020. With the adoption of Resolution No. 20-2188, the City Council authorized the preparation of an urban renewal plan. The Plan was prepared and submitted to the Agency for its review and approval. The Agency approved the Plan by the adoption of Agency Resolution No. on , 2020, and submitted the Plan to the City Council with its recommendation for adoption. In accordance with the Law, this Plan was submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City. After consideration of the Plan, the Commission,by resolution, reported to the City Council that this Plan is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Pursuant to the Law and Act, the City Council having published due notice thereof, a public hearing was held on this Plan. Notice of the hearing was published in the Meridian Press, a newspaper having general circulation in the City. The City Council adopted this Plan on [ _], 2020, by Ordinance No. [ ]. 103 History and Current Conditions of the Area The Project Area is geographically discrete and contains approximately 16 acres of underdeveloped land and right-of-way near the City's downtown core and is generally bounded by E. Idaho Avenue to the north, E. Third Street to the east, a portion of the railroad right-of-way 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 168 of 265 to the south and N. Main Street to the west. The Project Area is zoned Old Town(OT), which is intended to encourage a "centralized activity center and to encourage its renewal, revitalization and growth as the public, quasi-public, cultural, financial and recreational center of the City. Public and quasi-public uses integrated with general business, and medium high to high density residential is encouraged to provide the appropriate mix and intensity of activities necessary to establish a truly urban City center." Currently, a significant portion of the Project Area is under the ownership of public entities and older commercial buildings on the northerly end of the Project Area have been converted to public use as adjunct library space and an interim community center. This portion of the Project Area also includes a small, City park. The southerly end of the Project Area is occupied by older dilapidated structures located on large parcels and previously used for the sale and storage of building materials. This area also includes a portion of railroad right-of-way. The Project Area includes a total of fifteen (15) tax parcels. Despite the increasing development in the City, the Project Area has remained virtually unchanged over the last nineteen (19)years and does not reflect the vision for the area provided in City planning documents. While generally the roadways surrounding the block north of E. Broadway Avenue have been improved to current City standards with curbs, gutters, street lighting and storm drainage facilities, the area south of E. Broadway Avenue requires further investment in the public improvements. A portion of the south side of E. Broadway Avenue remains unimproved as does the east side of E. 3rd Street. The west side of E. 3rd Street south of E. Broadway Avenue has curb and gutters in place with an adjacent narrow sidewalk, which is interrupted by several unused curb cuts. The sidewalk appears unmaintained and is of insufficient width to accommodate the high-density activity envisioned in City planning documents. Improvements to the pedestrian facilities will serve the increased number of pedestrians anticipated in the Project Area and will help with connectivity. While water lines serve the Project Area, the water line located on the south side of the railroad property does not extend the full length of the property and therefore is not looped into the Main Street line. Further, the water main located in E. 3rd Street will likely need to be upsized to a 12"main to serve the Project Area. These deficiencies are critical and require remediation to support the necessary fire flows required for increased density in the Project Area. A significant impediment to development has been the railroad parcels with attendant title issues. Multiple attempts at conveyance and development have occurred over the last several decades; however, the unusual conditions of title have likely stalled development, resulting in vacant,underutilized parcels. The E. 3rd Street railroad crossing is currently protected only by stop signs. With increased density, additional protections at the crossing may be needed as the rail line is active and serves as the primary transit corridor for freight movements from Boise and Meridian to the railroad mainline connection in Nampa. Finally, the Project Area includes a portion of an open ditch lateral, the Hunter Lateral, which crosses E. 3rd Street near the intersection with Broadway. As the lateral turns north across 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 169 of 265 E. Broadway Avenue, the lateral is piped and undergrounded. The open ditch in this area creates safety concerns for pedestrians. The Plan proposes improvements to public infrastructure and other publicly-owned assets throughout the Project Area, creating the framework for the development of a mixed-use, retail, office, residential project, including the development of a community/recreation center, as well as other public facilities and improvements, including but not limited to streets, streetscapes, water and sewer improvements, environmental and floodplain remediation/site preparation, public parking, other community facilities,parks, and pedestrian/bike paths and trails. The Project Area is underdeveloped and is not being used to its highest and best use due to the presence of a substantial number of deteriorating structures, deterioration of site, age and obsolescence, a predominance of defective or inadequate street layout, faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility or usefulness, insanitary or unsafe conditions, and defective or unusual conditions of title. The foregoing conditions have resulted in economic underdevelopment of the area and has arrested or impaired growth in the Project Area. The preparation and approval of an urban renewal plan, including a revenue allocation financing provision, gives the City additional resources to solve the public infrastructure problems in this area. Revenue allocation financing should help to improve the situation. In effect, property taxes generated by new developments within the area may be used by the Agency to finance a variety of needed public improvements and facilities. Finally, some of the new developments may also generate new jobs in the community that would, in turn, benefit area residents. It is unlikely individual developers will take on the prohibitive costs of constructing the necessary infrastructure in the Project Area without the ability of revenue allocation to help offset at least some of these costs. But for urban renewal and revenue allocation financing the proposed commercial and community developments and related public improvements would not occur. 104 Purpose of Activities Attachment 5 includes identification of the proposed public improvements necessary for the contemplated development in the Project Area with specificity. The description of activities, public improvements, and the estimated costs of those items are intended to create an outside limit of the Agency's activity. Due to the inherent difficulty in projecting future levy rates, future taxable value, and the future costs of construction, the Agency reserves the right to: a. Change funding amounts from one Project to another b. To re-prioritize the Projects described in this Plan and the Plan Attachments c. Retain flexibility in funding the various activities in order to best meet the Plan and the needs of the Project Area. d. Retain flexibility in determining whether to use the Agency's funds or funds generated by other sources. 7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 170 of 265 e. Alter the location of proposed improvements set forth in Attachment 5 to support development when it occurs. The information included in Attachment 5 presents realistic alternative development scenarios recognizing it is difficult to project with any certainty where the improvements will be sited until any future projects submit plans to the City for design review and permitting. The Agency intends to discuss and negotiate with any owner or developer of the parcels within the Project Area seeking Agency assistance during the duration of the Plan and Project Area. During such negotiation, the Agency will determine, on an individual basis, the eligibility of the activities sought for Agency funding, the amount the Agency may fund by way of percentage or other criteria including the need for such assistance. The Agency will also take into account the amount of revenue allocation proceeds estimated to be generated from the developer's activities. The Agency also reserves the right to establish by way of policy, its funding percentage or participation, which would apply to all developers and owners and may prioritize certain projects or types of projects. Throughout this Plan, there are references to Agency activities, Agency funding, and the acquisition, development, and contribution of public improvements. Such references do not necessarily constitute a full, final, and formal commitment by the Agency but, rather, grant to the Agency the discretion to participate as stated subject to achieving the objectives of this Plan and provided such activity is deemed eligible under the Law and the Act. The activities listed in Attachment 5 will be determined or prioritized as the overall Project Area develops and through the annual budget setting process. The activities listed in Attachment 5 are also prioritized by way of importance to the Agency by the amounts funded, and by year of funding, with earlier years reflecting the more important activities, achievement of higher objectives, long term goals, and commitments. The projected timing of funding is primarily a function of market conditions and the availability of financial resources but is also strategic, considering the timing of private development partnership opportunities and the ability of certain strategic activities to stimulate development at given points in time within the planned 20-year period of the urban renewal district and revenue allocation area. The Study (Attachment 5)has described a list of prioritized public improvements and other related activities with an estimated cost in 2020 dollars of approximately $15,040,000.00 for improvements related to construction of a community center,public open spaces, construction of a public parking structure or structures and/or public surface parking facilities, and public improvements related to private development of mixed-use commercial, office, and residential buildings. This amount does not take into account inflationary factors, such as increasing construction costs, which would increase that figure depending on when the owner, developer and/or Agency is able to develop, construct or initiate those activities. The Study has concluded the capacity of revenue allocation funds through the term of the Plan based on the assumed development projects and assessed value increases will likely generate an estimated $16,286,437.00. Subject to the City's annual budgeting requirements and the availability of funds, the City may contribute to the construction of the community facility in the amount of 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 171 of 265 $3,000,000.00. The Agency reserves the discretion and flexibility to use revenue allocation proceeds in excess of the amounts predicted in the event higher increases in assessed values occur during the term of the Plan for the improvements and activities identified. Additionally, the Agency reserves the discretion and flexibility to use other sources of funds unrelated to revenue allocation to assist in the funding of the improvements and activities identified. 200 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AREA The boundaries of the Project Area and the Revenue Allocation Area are shown on the Project Area and Revenue Allocation Boundary Map, attached hereto as Attachment 1 and incorporated herein by reference, and are described in the Legal Description of the Project Area and Revenue Allocation Area, attached hereto as Attachment 2 and incorporated herein by reference. For purposes of boundary descriptions and the use of proceeds for payment of improvements, the boundary shall be deemed to extend to the outer boundary of rights-of-way or other natural boundary unless otherwise stated. 300 PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT ACTIONS 301 General The Agency proposes to eliminate and prevent the spread of deteriorating conditions and deterioration in the Project Area by employing a strategy to improve and develop public and private lands, and to grow the economy in the Project Area. Implementation of the strategy includes, but is not limited to the following actions: a. The engineering, design, installation, construction, and/or reconstruction of streets and streetscapes, including but not limited to improvements and upgrades to E. Broadway Avenue,N. Main Street, E. 2nd Street, and E. 3rd Street and related pedestrian facilities, curb and gutter, intersection and rail crossing improvements, and traffic signals; b. The engineering, design, installation, construction, and/or reconstruction of storm water management infrastructure to support compliance with federal, state, and local regulations for storm water discharge and to support private development; C. The engineering, design, installation, construction, and/or reconstruction of utilities (within and outside of the Project Area) including but not limited to improvements and upgrades to the water distribution system, water capacity improvements, water storage upgrades, sewer system improvements and upgrades, gravity interceptor, and improvements, and upgrades to power, gas, fiber optics, communications and other such facilities. Construction of utilities outside of the Project Area are directly related to the growth and development within the Project Area, but cannot be sited within the Project Area; 9 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 172 of 265 d. Removal, burying, or relocation of overhead utilities; removal or relocation of underground utilities; extension of electrical distribution lines and transformers; improvement of irrigation and drainage ditches and laterals; undergrounding or piping of laterals; addition of fiber optic lines or other communication systems; public parking facilities, and other public improvements, including but not limited to, fire protection systems, roadways, curbs, gutters, and streetscapes, which for purposes of this Plan, the term streetscapes includes sidewalks, lighting, landscaping, benches, signage,bike racks,public art, and similar amenities between the curb and right-of-way line; and other public improvements, including public open spaces that may be deemed appropriate by the Board; e. The engineering, design, installation, and/or construction of a community/recreation facility, and related public improvements; f. The engineering, design, installation, and/or construction of a public parking structure or structures and/or public surface parking lot and related public improvements; g. The provision for participation by property owners and developers within the Project Area to achieve the objectives of this Plan; h. The management of any property acquired by and under the ownership and control of the Agency; i. The provision for relocation assistance to displaced Project Area occupants and/or businesses as a result of any Agency activity, as may be required by law; j. The development or redevelopment of land by private enterprise or public agencies for uses in accordance with this Plan; k. The acquisition of real property for public right-of-way improvements,pedestrian facilities,utility undergrounding, public parking facilities, useable public space, pathways, and streetscape improvements to create development opportunities consistent with the Plan, including but not limited to future disposition to qualified developers and for qualified developments, including economic development, and/or other public entities; 1. The demolition or removal of certain buildings and/or improvements for public rights-of-way, pedestrian facilities, utility undergrounding, public parking facilities,useable public space, pathways and streetscape improvements to encourage and enhance transportation and mobility options, decrease underutilized parcels, to eliminate unhealthful,unsanitary, or unsafe conditions, eliminate obsolete or other uses detrimental to the public welfare or otherwise to remove or to prevent the spread of deteriorating or deteriorated conditions and to promote economic growth and development or redevelopment; 10 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 173 of 265 in. The disposition of real property through a competitive process in accordance with this Plan, Idaho law, including Idaho Code § 50-2011, and any disposition policies adopted by the Agency; n. The rehabilitation and adaptive reuse and repurposing of existing structures and improvements; o. The preparation and assembly of adequate sites for the development and construction of facilities for mixed-use, residential, commercial, retail areas, transit facilities, educational facilities and community and recreation facilities; p. To the extent allowed by law, lend or invest federal or state funds to facilitate redevelopment; q. The environmental assessment and remediation of brownfield sites, or sites where environmental conditions detrimental to redevelopment exist; r. In collaboration with property owners and other stakeholders, working with the City to amend zoning regulations (if necessary) and standards and guidelines for the design of streetscape, plazas, pedestrian corridors, parks, open space and other like public spaces applicable to the Project Area as needed to support implementation of this Plan; S. Agency and/or owner-developer construction, participation in the construction and/or management of public parking facilities that support a desired level and form of development to enhance the vitality of the Project Area; t. The construction and financial support of cultural facilities and the enhancement and construction of parks, open spaces, and public recreational facilities; U. The provision of financial and other assistance to encourage and attract business enterprise including but not limited to start-ups and microbusiness,unique cultural businesses, mid-sized companies, and large-scale corporations; V. In conjunction with the City, the establishment and implementation of performance criteria to assure high site design standards and environmental quality and other design elements which provide unity and integrity to the entire Project Area, including commitment of funds for planning studies, achieving high standards of development, and leveraging such development to achieve public objectives and efficient use of scarce resources. W. Other related improvements to those set forth above as further set forth in Attachment 5. 11 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 174 of 265 In the accomplishment of these purposes and activities and in the implementation and furtherance of this Plan, the Agency is authorized to use all the powers provided in this Plan and as permitted by the Law and the Act. 302 Urban Renewal Plan Objectives Urban renewal activity is necessary in the Project Area to combat problems of physical deterioration or deteriorating conditions. As set forth in greater detail in Section 103, the Project Area has a history of stagnant growth and development compared to the greater downtown area of the City based on deteriorated or deteriorating conditions that have arrested or impaired growth in the Project Area primarily attributed to: underdeveloped properties; inadequate pedestrian and bicycle connectivity and mobility; the presence of a substantial number of deteriorating structures; deterioration of site; age and obsolescence; a predominance of defective or inadequate street layout; faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility or usefulness; unsanitary or unsafe conditions; and defective or very unusual conditions of title. The Plan for the Project Area is a proposal to work in partnership with public and private entities to improve, develop, and grow the economy within the Project Area by the implementation of a strategy and program set forth in Section 301. The provisions of this Plan are applicable to all public and private property in the Project Area. The provisions of the Plan shall be interpreted and applied as objectives and goals, recognizing the need for flexibility in interpretation and implementation, while at the same time not in any way abdicating the rights and privileges of the property owners which are vested in the present and future zoning classifications of the properties. All development under an owner participation agreement shall conform to those standards specified in Section 303 of this Plan. It is recognized that the Ada County Highway District has exclusive jurisdiction over all public street rights-of-way within the Project Area, except for state highways. Nothing in this Plan shall be construed to alter the powers of the Ada County Highway District pursuant to Title 40,Idaho Code. This Plan must be practical in order to succeed. Particular attention has been paid to how it can be implemented, given the changing nature of market conditions. Transforming the Project Area into a vital, thriving part of the community requires a proactive strategy. The following represents the key elements of that effort: a. Initiate simultaneous projects designed to revitalize the Project Area. From street and utility improvements to significant new public or private development, the Agency plays a key role in creating the necessary momentum to get and keep things going. b. Develop new mixed-use residential, commercial, and retail areas including the development of a community and recreation facility, as well as encourage other economic development opportunities. 12 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 175 of 265 C. Secure and improve certain public open space in critical areas. d. Initiate projects designed to encourage affordable and workforce housing options and increased transportation and mobility options. Without direct public intervention, the Project Area has and could conceivably remain unchanged and in a deteriorated and/or deteriorating condition for the next twenty (20)years. The Plan creates the necessary flexible framework for the Project Area to support the City's economic development while complying with the "specificity"requirement set forth in Idaho Code § 50-2905. Land use in the Project Area may be modified to the extent that the existing brownfields, and underutilized,underdeveloped, deteriorated, deteriorating and vacant land, and land now devoted to scattered inconsistent uses may be converted to a mixed-use, commercial, retail, and residential area, including a community recreation facility, public open spaces, and a public parking structure and/or a public surface parking lot. In implementing the activities described in this Plan, the Agency shall give due consideration to the provision of adequate park, open space and community and recreational areas and facilities that may be desirable for neighborhood improvement, with special consideration for the health, safety, and welfare of residents in the general vicinity of the Project Area covered by the Plan, recognizing the mixed-use nature of the Project Area. 303 Participation Opportunities and Participation Agreements The Agency may enter into various development participation agreements with any existing or future owners of property in the Project Area, in the event such a property owner seeks and/or receives assistance from the Agency in the development and/or redevelopment of the property. The term "participation agreement" is intended to include all participation agreements with a property owner, including reimbursement agreements, grant agreements, disposition and development agreements or owner participation agreements. In that event, the Agency may allow for an existing or future owner of property to remove the property and/or structure from future Agency acquisition subject to entering into an owner participation agreement. It is anticipated the Agency will enter into an owner participation agreement with the current owner/developer of property within the Project Area and/or its related entities. The Agency may also enter into owner participation agreements with other future owners and developers within the Project Area throughout the duration of this Plan in order to implement the infrastructure improvements set forth in this Plan. Each structure and building in the Project Area to be rehabilitated or to be constructed as a condition of the owner participation agreement between the Agency and the owner pursuant to this Plan will be considered to be satisfactorily rehabilitated and constructed pursuant to the requirements of the Law and Act, if the rehabilitated or new structure meets the standards set forth in an executed owner participation agreement and complies with the applicable provisions of this Plan, local codes and ordinances and the Idaho Code. 13 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 176 of 265 All owner participation agreements will address development timing, justification and eligibility of project costs, and achievement of the objectives of the Plan. The Agency shall retain its discretion in the funding level of its participation. Obligations under owner participation agreements shall terminate no later than the termination date of this Plan— December 31, 2040. The Agency shall retain its discretion to negotiate an earlier date to accomplish all obligations under any owner participation agreement. In all owner participation agreements,participants who retain real property shall be required to join in the recordation of such documents as may be necessary to make the provisions of this Plan applicable to their properties. Whether or not a participant enters into an owner participation agreement with the Agency, the provisions of this Plan are applicable to all public and private property in the Project Area. In the event a participant under an owner participation agreement fails or refuses to rehabilitate, develop, use, and maintain its real property pursuant to this Plan and an owner participation agreement, the real property or any interest therein may be acquired by the Agency in accordance with Section 305.1 of this Plan and sold or leased for rehabilitation or development in accordance with this Plan. Owner participation agreements may be used to implement the following objectives: • Encouraging property owners to revitalize and/or remediate deteriorated areas or deteriorating areas of their parcels to accelerate development in the Project Area. • Subject to the limitations of the Law and the Act, providing incentives to property owners to encourage utilization and expansion of existing permitted uses during the transition period to prevent a decline in the employment base and a proliferation of vacant and deteriorated parcels in the Project Area during the extended development and/or redevelopment of the Project Area. • To accommodate improvements and expansions allowed by City regulations and generally consistent with this Plan for the Project Area. • Subject to the limitations of the Law and Act, providing incentives to improve nonconforming properties so they implement the design guidelines contained in this Plan to the extent possible and to encourage an orderly transition from nonconforming to conforming uses through the term of the Plan. • Provide for advance funding by the developer/owner participant of those certain public improvements related to or needed for the private development and related to the construction and certain public improvements related to the community/recreation facility,public open spaces, and public parking structures and/or surface lots. In that event, the Agency will agree as set out in the owner participation agreement to reimburse a portion of, or all of, the costs of public 14 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 177 of 265 improvements identified in the participation agreement from the revenue allocation generated by the private development. 304 Cooperation with Public Bodies Certain public bodies are authorized by state law to aid and cooperate, with or without consideration, in the planning, undertaking, construction, or operation of this Project. The Agency shall seek the aid and cooperation of such public bodies and shall attempt to coordinate this Plan with the activities of such public bodies in order to accomplish the purposes of redevelopment and the highest public good. The Agency, by law, is not authorized to acquire real property owned by public bodies without the consent of such public bodies. The Agency will seek the cooperation of all public bodies which own or intend to acquire property in the Project Area. All plans for development of property in the Project Area by a public body shall be subject to Agency approval, in the event the Agency is providing any financial assistance. Subject to applicable authority, the Agency may impose on all public bodies the planning and design controls contained in this Plan to ensure that present uses and any future development by public bodies will conform to the requirements of this Plan; provided, however, the Ada County Highway District has exclusive jurisdiction over Ada County Highway District streets. The Agency is authorized to financially(and otherwise) assist any public entity in the cost of public land, buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements of the Project Area as allowed by the Law and Act. The Agency intends to cooperate to the extent allowable with the City and ACHD, as the case may be, for the engineering, design, installation, construction, and/or reconstruction of public infrastructure improvements, including,but not limited to water, sewer, storm drainage, electrical, natural gas, telecommunication, or other similar systems and lines, streets, roads, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, walkways,public parking facilities and a community/recreation facility. The Agency shall also cooperate with the City and ACHD on various relocation, screening, or underground projects and the providing of fiber optic capability. To the extent any public entity, including the City, has funded certain improvements such as roadway improvements,pedestrian facilities, water and sewer facilities or storm drainage improvements, the Agency may reimburse those entities for those expenses. The Agency also intends to cooperate and seek available assistance from state, federal and other sources for economic development. In the event the Agency is participating in the public development by way of financial incentive or otherwise, the public body shall enter into an agreement with the Agency and then shall be bound by the Plan and other land use elements and shall take into consideration those standards specified in Section 303 of this Plan. This Plan does not financially bind or obligate the Agency to any project or property acquisition; rather, for purposes of determining the economic feasibility of the Plan certain 15 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 178 of 265 projects and expenditures have been estimated and included in the analysis. Agency revenue and the ability to fund reimbursement of eligible Project Costs is more specifically detailed in any owner participation agreement and in the annual budget adopted by the Agency Board. 305 Property Acquisition 305.1 Real Property Only as specifically authorized herein, the Agency may acquire, through the voluntary measures described below, but is not required to acquire, any real property located in the Project Area where it is determined that the property is needed for construction of public improvements, required to eliminate or mitigate the deteriorated or deteriorating conditions, to facilitate economic development, including acquisition of real property intended for disposition to qualified developers through a competitive process, and as otherwise allowed by law. The acquisition shall be by any means authorized by law, including, but not limited to, the Law, the Act, and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, but shall not include the right to invoke eminent domain authority except as authorized by Idaho law and provided herein. The Agency is authorized to acquire either the entire fee or any other interest in real property less than a fee, including structures and fixtures upon the real property, without acquiring the land upon which those structures and fixtures are located. The Agency intends to acquire any real property through voluntary or consensual gift, devise, exchange, or purchase. Such acquisition of property may be for the development of the public improvements identified in this Plan. Acquisition of property may be for the assembly of properties for redevelopment to achieve Plan goals including public benefits. Such properties may include properties owned by private parties or public entities. This Plan anticipates the Agency's use of its resources for property acquisition. In the event the Agency identifies certain property which should be acquired to develop certain public improvements intended to be constructed under the provisions of this Plan, the Agency shall coordinate such property acquisition with any other public entity(e.g., without limitation, the City, the state of Idaho, or any of its authorized agencies), including the assistance of Agency funds to acquire said property either through a voluntary acquisition or the invocation of eminent domain authority as limited by Idaho Code § 7-701A. The Agency is authorized by this Plan and Idaho Code §§ 50-2010 and 50-2018(12)to acquire the properties identified in Attachment 3 hereto for the purposes set forth in this Plan. The Agency has identified its intent to acquire and/or participate in the development of certain public improvements, including, but not limited to streets, streetscapes, lighting, water and sewer improvements, improvements to the lateral, drainage facilities, intersection improvements, including the installation of traffic signals and/or rail crossings,parking, parks and open space, multi-use paths and trails,power and gas improvements and/or relocations, and other related public infrastructure improvements, such as a community recreation facility and public structured parking facility and/or surface lots. Further, the Agency may acquire real property to 16 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 179 of 265 facilitate commercial development by assembling and disposing of developable parcels. The Agency's property acquisition will result in remediating deteriorating conditions in the Project Area by facilitating the development of a mixed-use, office, residential, commercial, and retail area, as well as a community recreation facility and public structured parking and/or surface lots. The public improvements are intended to be dedicated to the City upon completion. The Agency reserves the right to determine which properties identified, if any, should be acquired. It is in the public interest and is necessary, in order to eliminate the conditions requiring development and/or redevelopment and in order to execute this Plan, for the power of eminent domain to be employed by the Agency to acquire real property in the Project Area for the public improvements identified in this Plan, which cannot be acquired by gift, devise, exchange, purchase, or any other lawful method, subject to the limitations set forth in Idaho Code § 7- 701 A. Under the provisions of the Act, the urban renewal plan"shall be sufficiently complete to indicate such land acquisition, demolition, and removal of structures, redevelopment, improvements, and rehabilitation as may be proposed to be carried out in the urban renewal area." Idaho Code § 50-2018(12). The Agency has generally described those properties by use as set out in Attachment 3 for acquisition for the construction of public improvements. The Agency may also acquire property for the purpose of developing streetscape and public utilities. The Agency reserves the right to determine which properties identified, if any, should be acquired. 305.2 Personal Property Generally,personal property shall not be acquired. However, where necessary in the execution of this Plan, the Agency is authorized to acquire personal property in the Project Area by any lawful means, including eminent domain as limited by Idaho Code § 7-701A for the purpose of developing the public improvements described in section 305.1. 306 Property Management During the time real property, if any, in the Project Area is owned by the Agency, such property shall be under the management and control of the Agency. Such property may be rented or leased by the Agency pending its disposition for development and/or redevelopment, and such rental or lease shall be pursuant to such policies as the Agency may adopt. 307 Relocation of Persons (Including Individuals and Families), Business Concerns, and Others Displaced by the Project If the Agency receives federal funds for real estate acquisition and relocation, the Agency shall comply with 24 C.F.R. Part 42, implementing the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended. The Agency reserves the right to extend benefits for relocation to those not otherwise entitled to relocation benefits as a matter of state law under the Act or the Law. The Agency 17 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 180 of 265 may determine to use as a reference the relocation benefits and guidelines promulgated by the federal government, the state government, or local government, including the State Department of Transportation and the Ada County Highway District. The intent of this section is to allow the Agency sufficient flexibility to award relocation benefits on some rational basis, or by payment of some lump-sum per case basis. The Agency may also consider the analysis of replacement value for the compensation awarded to either owner occupants or businesses displaced by the Agency to achieve the objectives of this Plan. The Agency may adopt relocation guidelines which would define the extent of relocation assistance in non-federally- assisted projects and which relocation assistance to the greatest extent feasible would be uniform. The Agency shall also coordinate with the various local, state, or federal agencies concerning relocation assistance as may be warranted. In the event the Agency's activities result in displacement of families, the Agency shall comply with, at a minimum, the standards set forth in the Law. The Agency shall also comply with all applicable state laws concerning relocation benefits and shall also coordinate with the various local, state, or federal agencies concerning relocation assistance. 308 Demolition, Clearance and Site Preparation The Agency is authorized(but not required)to demolish and clear buildings, structures, and other improvements from any real property in the Project Area as necessary to carry out the purposes of this Plan. Further, the Agency is authorized(but not required)to prepare, or cause to be prepared, as building sites any real property in the Project Area owned by the Agency including site preparation and/or environmental remediation. 309 Property Disposition and Development 309.1. Disposition by the Agency For the purposes of this Plan, the Agency is authorized to sell, lease, lease/purchase, exchange, subdivide, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber by mortgage or deed of trust, or otherwise dispose of any interest in real property under the reuse provisions set forth in Idaho law, including Idaho Code § 50-2011 and pursuant to any disposition policies adopted by the Agency. To the extent permitted by law, the Agency is authorized to dispose of real property by negotiated lease, sale, or transfer without public bidding. Real property acquired by the Agency may be conveyed by the Agency and, where beneficial to the Project Area, without charge to any public body as allowed by law. All real property acquired by the Agency in the Project Area shall be sold or leased to public or private persons or entities for development for the uses permitted in this Plan. Air rights and subterranean rights may be disposed of for any permitted use within the Project Area boundaries. 18 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 181 of 265 309.2 Disposition and Development Agreements To provide adequate safeguards to ensure that the provisions of this Plan will be carried out and to prevent the recurrence of deteriorating conditions, all real property sold, leased, or conveyed by the Agency is subject to the provisions of this Plan. The Agency shall reserve such powers and controls in the disposition and development documents as the Agency deems may be necessary to prevent transfer, retention, or use of property for speculative purposes and to ensure that development is carried out pursuant to this Plan. Leases, lease/purchases, deeds, contracts, agreements, and declarations of restrictions of the Agency may contain restrictions, covenants, covenants running with the land, rights of reverter, conditions subsequent, equitable servitudes, or any other provisions necessary to carry out this Plan. Where appropriate, as determined by the Agency, such documents, or portions thereof, shall be recorded in the office of the Recorder of Ada County, Idaho. All property in the Project Area is hereby subject to the restriction that there shall be no discrimination or segregation based upon race, color, creed, religion, sex, age, national origin, or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, disability/handicap, tenure, or enjoyment of property in the Project Area. All property sold, leased, conveyed, or subject to a disposition and development agreement shall be expressly subject by appropriate documents to the restriction that all deeds, leases, or contracts for the sale, lease, sublease, or other transfer of land in the Project Area shall contain such nondiscrimination and nonsegregation clauses as required by law. As required by law or as determined in the Agency's discretion to be in the best interest of the Agency and the public, the following requirements and obligations shall be included in the disposition and development agreement. That the developers, their successors, and assigns agree: a. That a detailed scope and schedule for the proposed development shall be submitted to and agreed upon by the Agency. b. That the purchase or lease of the land and/or subterranean rights and/or air rights is for the purpose of redevelopment and not for speculation. C. That the building of improvements will be commenced and completed as jointly scheduled and determined by the Agency and the developer(s). d. That the site and construction plans will be submitted to the Agency for review as to conformity with the provisions and purposes of this Plan. 19 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 182 of 265 C. All new construction shall have a minimum estimated life as may be reasonable for the proposed development. f. That rehabilitation of any existing structure must assure that the structure is safe and sound in all physical respects and be refurbished and altered to bring the property to an upgraded marketable condition which will continue throughout an estimated useful life as may be reasonable for the proposed development. g That the Agency receives adequate assurance acceptable to the Agency to ensure performance under the contract for sale. h. All such buildings or portions of the buildings which are to remain within the Project Area shall be reconstructed in conformity with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City. i. All disposition and development documents shall be governed by the provisions of Section 408 of this Plan. The Agency also reserves the right to determine the extent of its participation based upon the achievements of the objectives of this Plan. Obligations under any disposition and development agreement and deed covenants, except for covenants which run with the land, beyond the termination date of this Plan, shall terminate no later than December 31, 2040. The Agency shall retain its discretion to negotiate an earlier date to accomplish all obligations under any disposition and development agreement. 309.3. Development by the Agency To the extent now or hereafter permitted by law, the Agency is authorized to pay for, develop, or construct public improvements within the Project Area for itself or for any public body or entity, which public improvements are or would be of benefit to the Project Area. Specifically, the Agency may pay for, install, or construct the public improvements authorized under Idaho Code Section 50-2007, 50-2018(10) and(13), and 50-2903(9), (13), and(14), and as otherwise identified in Attachment 5 and may acquire or pay for the land required therefore. Any public facility ultimately owned by the Agency shall be operated and managed in such a manner to preserve the public purpose nature of the facility. Any lease agreement with a private entity or management contract agreement shall include all necessary provisions sufficient to protect the public interest and public purpose. The Agency may enter into contracts, leases, and agreements with the City or other public body or private entity pursuant to this section, and the obligation of the Agency under such contract, lease, or agreement shall constitute an indebtedness of the Agency as described in Idaho Code § 50-2909 which may be made payable out of the taxes levied in the Project Area and allocated to the Agency under Idaho Code § 50-2908(2)(b) and Section 504 to this Plan or out of any other available funds. 20 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 183 of 265 310 Development Plans All development plans (whether public or private)prepared, pursuant to disposition and development agreement or owner participation agreement, shall be submitted to the Agency Board for approval and review. All development in the Project Area must conform to those standards specified in Section 408 and all applicable City ordinances. 311 Personal Property Disposition For the purposes of this Plan, the Agency is authorized to lease, sell, exchange, transfer, assign,pledge, encumber, or otherwise dispose of personal property which is acquired by the Agency. 312 Participation with Others Under the Law, the Agency has the authority to lend or invest funds obtained from the federal government for the purposes of the Law if allowable under federal laws or regulations. The federal funds that may be available to the Agency are governed by regulations promulgated by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the Community Development Block Grant Program ("CDBG"), the Economic Development Administration, the Small Business Administration, or other federal agencies. In order to enhance such grants, the Agency's use of revenue allocation funds is critical. Under those regulations the Agency may participate with the private sector in the development and financing of those private projects that will attain certain federal objectives. The Agency may, therefore, use the federal funds for the provision of assistance to private for-profit business, including, but not limited to, grants, loans, loan guarantees, interest supplements, technical assistance, and other forms to support, for any other activity necessary or appropriate to carry out an economic development project. As allowed by law, the Agency may also use funds from any other sources or participate with the private or public sector with regard to any programs administered by the Idaho Department of Commerce for any purpose set forth under the Law or Act. The Agency may enter into contracts, leases, and agreements with the City, or other public body or private entity, pursuant to this section, and the obligation of the Agency under such contract, lease, or agreement shall constitute an indebtedness of the Agency as described in Idaho Code § 50-2909 which may be made payable out of the taxes levied in the Project Area and allocated to the Agency under Idaho Code § 50-2908(2)(b) and Section 504 to this Plan or out of any other available funds. 21 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 184 of 265 313 Conforming Owners The Agency may, at the Agency's sole and absolute discretion, determine that certain real property within the Project Area presently meets the requirements of this Plan. 314 Arts and Cultural Funding The Agency may dedicate resources for the construction or purchase of facilities for the placement and maintenance of public art and arts projects may be selected and provided by the Agency, separately from any construction costs of developers. Though not required, the Agency Board generally makes selections of the works of art with assistance from the City and the Meridian Arts Commission and may include review and approval of the City Council. When possible, any Agency arts funding will be used to leverage additional contributions from developers, other private sources, and public or quasi-public entitles for purposes of including public art within the streetscape projects identified in this Plan. 400 USES PERMITTED IN THE PROJECT AREA 401 Designated Land Uses The Agency intends to rely upon the overall land use designations and zoning classifications of the City, as may be amended, and as tentatively depicted on Attachment 4 and as set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan and within the Meridian zoning ordinance and requirements, including the future land use map and zoning classifications, as may be amended. For the most part, the Project Area will include a mixed-use commercial, retail, office and residential project, as well as, a community recreation facility,public open spaces, and public structured parking and/or surface lots. Such improvements are consistent with the OT zoning designation. Provided, however, nothing herein within this Plan shall be deemed to be granting any particular right to zoning classification or use. 402 Public Rights-of-Way The Project Area contains existing maintained public rights-of-way as set forth on Attachment 1, including but not limited to E. Broadway Avenue, E. Idaho Avenue, E. 2nd Avenue and E. 3rd Avenue. Additional public streets, alleys, and easements may be created in the Project Area as needed for development. Existing streets, alleys, and easements may be improved, abandoned, closed, vacated, expanded or modified as necessary for proper development of the Project Area, in accordance with any applicable policies and standards of the Idaho Transportation Department, the City or Ada County Highway District regarding changes to dedicated rights-of-way. Any development, maintenance and future changes to the existing interior or exterior street layout shall be in accordance with the objectives of this Plan, and the City, the Ada County Highway District, or the Idaho Department of Transportation's design standards as may be 22 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 185 of 265 applicable shall be effectuated in the manner prescribed by State and local law; and shall be guided by the following criteria: a. A balancing of the needs of proposed and potential new developments for adequate pedestrian and vehicular access (including cars, trucks,bicycles, etc.), vehicular parking, and delivery loading docks with the similar needs of any existing developments permitted to remain. Such balancing shall take into consideration the rights of existing owners and tenants under the rules for owner and tenant participation adopted by the Agency for the Project and any participation agreements executed thereunder; b. The requirements imposed by such factors as topography, traffic safety, and aesthetics; and C. The potential need to serve not only the Project Area and new or existing developments, but to also serve areas outside the Project Area by providing convenient and efficient vehicular access and movement. The public rights-of-way may be used for vehicular and/or pedestrian traffic, as well as for public improvements, public and private utilities, and activities typically found in public rights-of-way. 403 Other Public, Semi-Public, Institutional, and Nonprofit Uses The Agency is also authorized to permit the maintenance, establishment, or enlargement of public, semi-public, institutional, or nonprofit uses, including park and recreational facilities; educational, fraternal, employee; philanthropic and charitable institutions; utilities; governmental facilities; railroad rights-of-way and equipment; and facilities of other similar associations or organizations. All such uses shall, to the extent possible, conform to the provisions of this Plan applicable to the uses in the specific area involved. The Agency may impose such other reasonable requirements and/or restrictions as may be necessary to protect the development and use of the Project Area. 404 Interim Uses Pending the ultimate development of land by developers and participants, the Agency is authorized to use or allow the use of any land in the Project Area for interim uses that are not in conformity with the uses permitted in this Plan. However, any interim use must comply with applicable City Code. 405 Development in the Project Area Subject to the Plan All real property in the Project Area, under the provisions of either a disposition and development agreement or an owner participation agreement, is made subject to the controls and requirements of this Plan. No such real property shall be developed, rehabilitated, or otherwise 23 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 186 of 265 changed after the date of the adoption of this Plan, except in conformance with the provisions of this Plan. 406 Construction Shall Comply with Applicable Federal, State, and Local Laws and Ordinances and Agency Development Standards All construction in the Project Area shall comply with all applicable state laws, the Meridian City Code, as may be amended from time to time, and any applicable City Council ordinances pending codification, including but not limited to, regulations concerning the type, size, density, and height of buildings; open space, landscaping, light, air, and privacy; the undergrounding of utilities; limitation or prohibition of development that is incompatible with the surrounding area by reason of appearance, traffic, smoke, glare, noise, odor, or similar factors; parcel subdivision; off-street loading and off-street parking requirements. In addition to the Meridian City Code, ordinances, or other requirements governing development in the Project Area, additional specific performance and development standards may be adopted by the Agency to control and direct redevelopment activities in the Project Area in the event of a disposition and development agreement or owner participation agreement. 407 Minor Variations Under exceptional circumstances, the Agency, in its discretion, is authorized to allow a variation from the limits, restrictions, and controls established by this Plan. In order to allow such variation, the Agency must determine that the variation is not contrary to the objectives of this Plan, is not materially detrimental to the public interest and is not contrary to Idaho law. No variation shall be granted which permits other than a minor departure from the provisions of this Plan. In allowing any such variation, the Agency shall impose such conditions as are necessary to protect the public peace, health, safety, or welfare and to assure compliance with the purposes of the Plan. Any variation allowed by the Agency hereunder shall not supersede any other approval required under City codes and ordinances and shall not be considered a modification to the Plan. 408 Design for Development under a Disposition and Development Agreement or Owner Participation Agreement Within the limits, restrictions, and controls established in this Plan, the Agency is authorized to incorporate heights of buildings, density, land coverage, setback requirements, design criteria, traffic circulation, traffic access, and other development and design controls necessary for proper development of both private and public areas within the Project Area as conditions of approval in applicable Agency agreements, including but not limited to disposition and development agreements and owner participation agreements. Any development must also comply with the City's zoning ordinance regarding heights, setbacks, density and other like standards. 24 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 187 of 265 In the case of property which is the subject of a disposition and development agreement or an owner participation agreement with the Agency, no new improvement shall be constructed, and no existing improvement shall be substantially modified, altered, repaired, or rehabilitated, except in accordance with this Plan. Under those agreements the architectural, landscape, and site plans shall be submitted to the Agency and approved in writing by the Agency. One of the objectives of this Plan is to create an attractive and pleasant environment in the Project Area. Therefore, such plans shall give consideration to good design, open space, and other amenities to enhance the aesthetic quality of the Project Area. The Agency shall find that any approved plans do comply with this Plan. The Agency reserves the right to impose such design standards on an ad hoc, case by case basis through the approval process of the owner participation agreement or disposition and development agreement. Any change to such approved design must be consented to by the Agency and such consent may be conditioned upon reduction of Agency's financial participation towards the Project. In the event the Agency adopts design standards or controls related to receipt of assistance from the Agency, those provisions will thereafter apply to each site or portion thereof in the Project Area. Those controls and standards will be implemented through the provisions of any disposition and development agreement or owner participation agreement. These controls are in addition to any standards and provisions of any applicable City building or zoning ordinances; provided, however, each and every development shall comply with all applicable City zoning and building ordinance. 409 Nonconforming Uses This Section applies to property owners seeking assistance from the Agency regarding their property. The Agency may allow an existing use to remain in an existing building and site usage in good condition, which use does not conform to the provisions of this Plan, provided that such use is generally compatible with existing and proposed developments and uses in the Project Area. The owner of such a property must be willing to enter into an owner participation agreement and agree to the imposition of such reasonable restrictions as may be necessary to protect the development and use of the Project Area. The Agency may authorize additions, alterations, repairs, or other improvements in the Project Area for uses which do not conform to the provisions of this Plan where such improvements are within a portion of the Project Area where, in the determination of the Agency, such improvements would be compatible with surrounding Project uses and development. All nonconforming uses shall also comply with the City codes and ordinances. 25 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 188 of 265 500 METHODS OF FINANCING THE PROJECT 501 General Description of the Proposed Financing Methods The Agency is authorized to finance this Project with revenue allocation funds, financial assistance from the City(loans, grants, other financial assistance), state of Idaho, federal government or other public entities, interest income, developer advanced funds, donations, loans from private financial institutions (bonds, notes, line of credit), the lease or sale of Agency- owned property,public parking revenue, or any other available source,public or private, including assistance from any taxing district or any public entity. The Agency is also authorized to obtain advances, lines of credit,borrow funds, and create indebtedness in carrying out this Plan. The Agency may also consider an inter-fund transfer from other urban renewal project areas. The principal and interest on such advances, funds, and indebtedness may be paid from any funds available to the Agency. The City, as it is able, may also supply additional assistance through City loans and grants for various public facilities. As allowed by law and subject to restrictions as are imposed by law, the Agency is authorized to issue notes or bonds from time to time, if it deems appropriate to do so, in order to finance all or any part of the Project. Neither the members of the Agency nor any persons executing the bonds are liable personally on the bonds by reason of their issuance. 502 Revenue Allocation Financing Provisions The Agency hereby adopts revenue allocation financing provisions as authorized by the Act, effective retroactively to January 1, 2020. These revenue allocation provisions shall apply to all taxing districts which are located in or overlap the Revenue Allocation Area shown and described on Attachments 1 and 2 to this Plan. The Agency shall take all actions necessary or convenient to implement these revenue allocation financing provisions. The Agency specifically finds that the equalized assessed valuation of property within the Revenue Allocation Area is likely to increase as a result of the initiation of the Project. The Agency, acting by one or more resolutions adopted by its Board, is hereby authorized to apply all or any portion of the revenues allocated to the Agency pursuant to the Act to pay as costs are incurred(pay-as-you-go) or to pledge all or any portion of such revenues to the repayment of any moneys advance-funded by developers or owners,borrowed, indebtedness incurred, or notes or bonds issued by the Agency to finance or to refinance the Project Costs (as defined in Idaho Code § 50-2903(14)) of one or more urban renewal projects. The Agency may consider a note or line of credit issued by a bank or lending institution premised upon revenue allocation funds generated by a substantial private development contemplated by the Study as defined in section 502.1, which would allow the Agency to more quickly fund the public improvements contemplated by this Plan. Likewise, a developer/owner advanced funding could achieve the same purpose. 26 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 189 of 265 Upon enactment of a City Council ordinance finally adopting these revenue allocation financing provisions and defining the Revenue Allocation Area described herein as part of the Plan, there shall hereby be created a special fund of the Agency into which the County Treasurer shall deposit allocated revenues as provided in Idaho Code § 50-2908. The Agency shall use such funds solely in accordance with Idaho Code § 50-2909 and solely for the purpose of providing funds to pay the Project Costs, including any incidental costs, of such urban renewal projects as the Agency may determine by resolution or resolutions of its Board. A statement listing proposed public improvements and facilities, a schedule of improvements, an economic feasibility study, estimated project costs, fiscal impact upon other taxing districts, and methods of financing project costs required by Idaho Code § 50-2905 is included in this Plan and in Attachment 5 to this Plan. This statement necessarily incorporates estimates and projections based on the Agency's and the consultants' present knowledge and expectations. The Agency is hereby authorized to adjust the presently anticipated urban renewal projects and use of revenue allocation financing of the related Project Costs if the Board deems such adjustment necessary or convenient to effectuate the general objectives of the Plan in order to account for revenue inconsistencies, market adjustments, future priorities, and unknown future costs. Agency revenue and the ability to fund reimbursement of eligible Project Costs is more specifically detailed in the annual budget. The Agency may appropriate funds consisting of revenue allocation proceeds on an annual basis without the issuance of notes or bonds. The Agency may also obtain advances or loans from the City or Agency, or private entity and financial institutions in order to immediately commence construction of certain of the public improvements. Developer advanced funding of public improvements could also achieve the same purpose. The revenue allocation proceeds are hereby irrevocably pledged for the payment of the principal and interest on the advance of monies or making of loans or the incurring of any indebtedness such as bonds, notes, and other obligations (whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise)by the Agency to finance or refinance the Project in whole or in part, including reimbursement to developers for the cost of eligible public improvements. Revenues will continue to be allocated to the Agency until termination of the revenue allocation area as set forth in Section 800. Attachment 5 incorporates estimates and projections based on the Agency's and the consultants' present knowledge and expectations concerning the length of time to complete the improvements and estimated future revenues. The activity may take longer depending on the significance and timeliness of development. Alternatively, the activity may be completed earlier if revenue allocation proceeds are greater or the Agency obtains additional funds. 502.1 Economic Feasibility Study Attachment 5 constitutes the Economic Feasibility Study ("Study") for the urban renewal area prepared by Kushlan I Associates and SMR Development, LLC. The Study constitutes the 27 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 190 of 265 financial analysis required by the Act and is based upon existing information from property owners, developers, the Agency, City and others. 502.2 Assumptions and Conditions/Economic Feasibility Statement The information contained in Attachment 5 assumes certain completed and projected actions. All debt is projected to be repaid no later than the duration period of the Plan. The total amount of bonded indebtedness, developer reimbursement and all other loans or indebtedness, and the amount of revenue generated by revenue allocation are dependent upon the extent and timing of private development. Should all of the proposed development take place as projected, the project indebtedness could be extinguished earlier, dependent upon the bond sale documents or other legal obligations. Should private development take longer to materialize, or should the private development be substantially less than projected, then the amount of revenue generated will be substantially reduced and debt may continue for its full term. The Plan and the Plan Attachments incorporate estimates and projections based on the Agency's and consultants' present knowledge and expectations. The Plan proposes certain public improvements as set forth in Attachment 5, which will facilitate mixed-use commercial, residential, office and retail development in the Revenue Allocation Area. The assumptions set forth in the Study are based upon the best information available to the Agency and consultants through public sources or discussions with property owners, developers, City staff and others. The information has been analyzed by the Agency and its consultants in order to provide an analysis that meets the requirements set forth under the Law and Act. At the point in time when the Agency may seek a loan from lenders or others, a more detailed and then-current financial pro forma will be presented to those lenders or underwriters for analysis to determine the borrowing capacity of the Agency. As set forth herein, the Agency reserves the right to fund the Project on a"pay as you go"basis. The Agency Board will prioritize the activities set forth in this Plan and determine what funds are available and what activities can be funded. The Agency will establish those priorities through its mandated annual budgetary process. The list of public improvements, or activities within Attachment 5 are prioritized by way of importance to the Agency,by feasibility based on estimated revenues to be received, amounts funded, and by year of funding. The projected timing of funding is primarily a function of the availability of financial resources and market conditions but is also strategic, considering the timing of private development partnership opportunities and the ability of certain strategic activities to stimulate development at given points in time within the duration of the Plan and Project Area. The assumptions concerning revenue allocation proceeds are based upon certain anticipated development, assessed value increases and assumed levy rates as more specifically set forth in Attachment 5. Further, the financial analysis set forth in Attachment 5 has taken into 28 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 191 of 265 account and excluded levies that do not flow to the Agency consistent with Idaho Code § 50- 2908. The types of new construction expected in the Project Area are mixed-use, residential, commercial, office and retail projects, and related public improvements, as well as a community recreation facility,public open spaces, and public structured parking facility and/or surface parking lots. The Project Area has potential for a significant increase in residential, commercial, and retail growth due to the location of the Project Area. However, without a method to construct the identified public improvements such as water lines, street infrastructure, and pedestrian amenities, development is unlikely to occur in much of the Project Area. 502.3 Ten Percent Limitation Under the Act, the base assessed valuation for all revenue allocation areas cannot exceed gross/net ten percent(10%) of the current assessed taxable value for the entire City. According to the Ada County Assessor, the assessed taxable value for the City as of January 1, 20191, less homeowner's exemptions is $9,465,760,011.00. Therefore, the 10% limit is $946,576,001.00. The adjusted base assessed value of each of the existing or proposed revenue allocation areas as of January 1, 2019, is as follows: Meridian Revitalization Plan (Downtown District Plan) $131,252,900 Ten Mile District $12,582,900 Union District $2,163,380 The adjusted base values for the combined revenue allocation areas total $145,998,180, which is less than 10% of the City's 2019 taxable value. 502.4 Financial Limitation The Study identifies several capital improvement projects. Use of any particular financing or funding source for any particular purpose is not assured or identified. Use of the funding source shall be conditioned on any limitations set forth in the Law, the Act, by contract, or by other federal regulations. If revenue allocation funds are unavailable, then the Agency will need to use a different funding source for that improvement. The amount of funds available to the Agency from revenue allocation financing is directly related to the assessed value of new improvements within the Revenue Allocation Area. Under the Act, the Agency is allowed the revenue allocation generated from inflationary 1 Due to the timing of the assessment process and creation of this Plan,the 2019 values have been used to establish compliance with the 10%limitation. Using the 2019 values,the total adjusted base value of the existing and proposed revenue allocation areas combined with the value of this Project Area are less than 2%of the total taxable value of the City. Even assuming an increase in values for 2020,the combined adjusted base values of the revenue allocation areas would not exceed 10%of the current assessed taxable value for the entire City. 2 Less area deannexed by the First Amendment to the Meridian Revitalization Plan Urban Renewal Project,adopted by City Council Ordinance No. on June ,2020. 29 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 192 of 265 increases and new development value. Increases have been assumed based upon the projected value of new development as that development occurs along with possible land reassessment based on a construction start. The Study, with the various estimates and projections, constitutes an economic feasibility study. Costs and revenues are analyzed, and the analysis shows the need for public capital funds during the project. Multiple financing sources including annual revenue allocations, developer contributions, City contributions, interfund loan,property disposition, and other funds are shown. This Study identifies the kind, number, and location of all anticipated public works or improvements, a detailed list of estimated project costs, a description of the methods of financing the estimated project costs, and the time when related costs or monetary obligations are to be incurred. See Idaho Code § 50-2905. Based on these funding sources, the conclusion is that the project is feasible. The Agency reserves the discretion and flexibility to use revenue allocation proceeds in excess of the amounts projected in the Study for the purpose of funding the additional identified projects and improvements. The projections in the Study are based on reasonable assumptions and existing market conditions. However, should the Project Area result in greater than anticipated revenues, the Agency specifically reserves the ability to fund the additional activities and projects identified in this Plan. Further, the Agency reserves the discretion and flexibility to use other sources of funds unrelated to revenue allocation to assist in the funding of the improvements and activities identified, including but not limited to owner participation agreements and disposition and development agreements. The Agency may also, re-prioritize projects pursuant to market conditions, project timing, funding availability, etc. as more specifically detailed in the annual budget. The proposed timing for the public improvements may very well have to be adjusted depending upon the availability of some of the funds and the Agency's ability to finance any portion of the Project. Any adjustment to Project timing or funding is technical or ministerial in nature and shall not be considered a modification of the Plan pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-2903A. Attachment 5 lists those public improvements the Agency intends to construct through the term of the Plan. The costs of improvements are estimates only as it is impossible to know with any certainty what the costs of improvements will be in future years. There is general recognition that construction costs fluctuate and are impacted by future unknowns, such as, the cost of materials and laborers. Final costs will be determined by way of construction contract public bidding or by an agreement between the developer/owner and Agency. The listing of public improvements does not commit the City or Agency to any particular level of funding; rather, identification of the activity in the Plan allows the Agency to negotiate the terms of any reimbursement with the developer and/or City. This Plan does not financially bind or obligate the City or Agency to any project or property acquisition; rather, for purposes of determining the economic feasibility of the Plan certain projects and expenditures have been estimated and included in the analysis. Agency revenue and the ability to fund reimbursement of eligible 30 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 193 of 265 Project Costs is more specifically detailed in any participation agreement and in the annual budget adopted by the Agency Board. The Agency reserves its discretion and flexibility in deciding which improvements are more critical for development, and the Agency intends to coordinate its public improvements with associated development by private developers/owners. The Agency also intends to coordinate its participation in the public improvements with the receipt of certain grants or loans which may require the Agency's participation in some combination with the grant and loan funding. Generally, the Agency expects to develop those improvements identified in Attachment 5 first, in conjunction with private development within the Project Area generating the increment as identified in Attachment 5. The Plan has shown that the equalized valuation of the Revenue Allocation Area as defined in the Plan is likely to increase as a result of the initiation and completion of urban renewal projects pursuant to the Plan. 502.5 Participation with Local Improvement Districts and Business Improvement Districts Under the Idaho Local Improvement("LID") District Code, Chapter 17, Title 50, Idaho Code, the City has the authority to establish local improvement districts for various public facilities, including,but not limited to, streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, storm drains, landscaping, and other like facilities. To the extent allowed by the Law and the Act, the Agency reserves the authority,but not the obligation, to participate in the funding of local improvement district facilities. This participation may include either direct funding to reduce the overall cost of the LID or to participate as an assessed entity to finance the LID project. Similarly, to the extent allowed by the Law and the Act, the Agency reserves the authority, but not the obligation, to participate in the funding of the purposes specified under the Business Improvement Districts, Chapter 26, Title 50, Idaho Code. 502.6 Issuance of Debt and Debt Limitation Any debt incurred by the Agency as allowed by the Law and Act shall be secured by revenues identified in the debt resolution or revenue allocation funds as allowed by the Act. All such debt shall be repaid within the duration of this Plan, except as may be authorized by law. 502.7 Impact on Other Taxing Districts and Levy Rate An estimate of the overall impact of the revenue allocation project on each taxing district is shown in the Study through the new development projections set forth in Attachment 5. The assessed value for each property in a revenue allocation area consists of a base value and an increment value. The base value is the assessed value as of January I of the year in 31 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 194 of 265 which a revenue allocation area is approved by a municipality, with periodic adjustments allowed by Idaho law. The increment value is the difference between the adjusted base assessed value and current assessed taxable value in any given year while the property is in a revenue allocation area. Under Idaho Code § 63-802, taxing entities are constrained in establishing levy rates by the amount each budget of each taxing district can increase on an annual basis. Taxing entities submit proposed budgets to the County Board of Commissioners, which budgets are required to comply with the limitations set forth in Idaho Code § 63-802. Therefore, the impact of revenue allocation is more of a product of the imposition of Idaho Code § 63-802, than the effect of urban renewal. The County Board of Commissioners calculates the levy rate required to produce the proposed budget amount for each taxing entity using the assessed values which are subject to each taxing entity's levy rate. Assessed values in urban renewal districts which are subject to revenue allocation(incremental values) are not included in this calculation. The combined levy rate for the taxing entities is applied to the incremental property values in a revenue allocation area to determine the amount of property tax revenue which is allocated to an urban renewal agency. The property taxes generated by the base values in the urban renewal districts and by properties outside revenue allocation areas are distributed to the other taxing entities. Properties in revenue allocation areas are subject to the same levy rate as they would be outside a revenue allocation area. The difference is how the revenue is distributed. If the overall levy rate is less than assumed, the Agency will receive fewer funds from revenue allocation. In addition, without the Revenue Allocation Area and its ability to pay for public improvements and public facilities, fewer substantial improvements within the Revenue Allocation Area would be expected during the term of the Plan; hence, there would be lower increases in assessed valuation to be used by the other taxing entities. The Study's analysis is premised upon the fact the proposed development would not occur but for the ability to use revenue allocation funds to fund certain significant public infrastructure improvements. One result of new construction occurring outside the revenue allocation area(Idaho Code §§ 63-802 and 63-301A) is the likely reduction of the levy rate as assessed values increase for property within each taxing entity's jurisdiction. From and after December 31, 2006, Idaho Code § 63-301A prohibits taxing entities from including, as part of the new construction roll, the increased value related to new construction within a revenue allocation area until the revenue allocation authority is terminated. Any new construction within the Project Area is not available in the short term for inclusion by the taxing entities to increase their budget capacity. Under current law,upon termination of this Plan or deannexation of area, the taxing entities will be able to include the accumulated new construction roll value in setting the following year's budget and revenue from such value is not limited to the three percent increase allowed in Idaho Code § 63- 802(1)(a). 32 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 195 of 265 As 2019 certified levy rates are not determined until late September 2020, the 2019 certified levy rates have been used in the Study for purposes of the analysis.3 Those taxing districts and rates area as follows: Taxing District Levies: Ada County .002549212 Ada County Highway District .000771526 City of Meridian .003083910 West Ada School District .000014448 Ada County Ambulance .000121963 Mosquito Abatement District .000021765 College of Western Idaho .000128506 Meridian Cemetery .000037985 Meridian Free Library .000441567 Western Ada Recreation .000042391 TOTAL: .007213273 The Study has made certain assumptions concerning the levy rate primarily based on the Idaho Legislature's intended study of the property tax system, as well as the recognition of the termination of the Meridian Revitalization Plan Urban Renewal Project during the life of this Plan and Project Area. For purposes of this Plan and the Study, the levy rate is estimated conservatively to be .0065, which is an almost 10%reduction of the estimated applicable levy rate set forth above. The levy rate is estimated to stay level for the life of the revenue allocation area. If the overall levy rate is less than projected, or the land values do not increase as expected, or expected development fails to occur as estimated, the Agency shall receive fewer funds from revenue allocation. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-2908, the Agency is not entitled to revenue allocation proceeds from certain levy increases which are allowed by either specific statutory authorization or approved by an election of the qualified electors of the particular taxing district. Therefore, for any levy election, the Agency will not receive revenue allocation funds which would have been generated by imposing that levy on the assessed valuation within the Project Area. The Study has taken this statute into account. 503 Lease Revenue, Parking Revenue, and Bonds Under the Law(Idaho Code § 50-2012), the Agency is authorized to issue revenue bonds to finance certain public improvements identified in the Plan. Under that type of financing, the public entity would pay the Agency a lease payment annually which provides certain funds to the Agency to retire the bond debt. Another variation of this type of financing is sometimes referred to as conduit financing, which provides a mechanism where the Agency uses its bonding s Due to the timing of the taxing districts'budget and levy setting process,certification of the 2020 levy rates did not occur until after this Plan had been prepared and considered by the Agency. In order to provide a basis to analyze the impact on the taxing entities,the 2019 levy rates are used. Use of the 2019 levy rates provides a more accurate base than estimating the 2020 levy rates. 33 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 196 of 265 authority for the Project, with the end user making payments to the Agency to retire the bond debt. These sources of revenues are not related to revenue allocation funds and are not particularly noted in the Study, because of the "pass through" aspects of the financing. Under the Act, the economic feasibility study focuses on the revenue allocation aspects of the Agency's financial model. These financing models typically are for a longer period of time than the 20-year period set forth in the Act. However, these financing models do not involve revenue allocation funds, but rather funds from the end users which provide a funding source for the Agency to continue to own and operate the facility beyond the term of the Plan as allowed by Idaho Code § 50-2905(8) as those resources involve funds not related to revenue allocation funds. 504 Membership Dues and Support of Community Economic Development The Act is premised upon economic development being a valid public purpose. To the extent allowed by the Law and the Act, the Agency reserves the authority to use revenue allocation funds to contract with non-profit and charitable organizations established for the purpose of supporting economic development and job creation. Additionally, the Agency reserves the authority to expend revenue allocation funds to join,participate and support non- profit organizations established to support Agency best practices and administration. The District Operating Expenses identified in the Study shall be deemed to include expenditures for the purposes described in this section as may be deemed appropriate during the annual budgetary process. 600 ACTIONS BY THE CITY AND OTHER PUBLIC ENTITIES The City shall aid and cooperate with the Agency in carrying out this Plan and shall take all actions necessary to ensure the continued fulfillment of the purposes of this Plan and to prevent the recurrence or spread in the area of conditions causing deterioration. Actions by the City shall include,but not be limited to, the following: a. Institution and completion of proceedings necessary for changes and improvements in private and publicly owned public utilities within or affecting the Project Area. b. Revision of zoning (if necessary) within the Project Area to permit the land uses and development authorized by this Plan. C. Imposition wherever necessary of appropriate controls within the limits of this Plan upon parcels in the Project Area to ensure their proper development and use. d. Provision for administrative enforcement of this Plan by the City after development. The City and the Agency may develop and provide for enforcement of a program for continued maintenance by owners of all real 34 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 197 of 265 property,both public and private, within the Project Area throughout the duration of this Plan. e. Building Code enforcement. f. Performance of the above actions and of all other functions and services relating to public peace, health, safety, and physical development normally rendered in accordance with a schedule which will permit the development and/or redevelopment of the Project Area to be commenced and carried to completion without unnecessary delays. g. The undertaking and completing of any other proceedings necessary to carry out the Project. h. Administration of Community Development Block Grant funds that may be made available for this Project. i. Appropriate agreements with the Agency for administration, supporting services, funding sources, and the like. j. Use of public entity labor, services, and materials for construction of the public improvements listed in this Plan. k. Coordination of the development agreements entered into by the City and developer with the goals of the Plan. 1. Assist with coordinating and implementing the public improvements in the Project Area identified in the Study. In addition to the above, the City may elect to waive hookup or installation fees for sewer, water, or other utility services for any facility owned by any public entity or Agency facility and waive any city impact fee for development within the Project Area. The foregoing actions to be taken by the City do not constitute any commitment for financial outlays by the City or other applicable public entity. 601 Maintenance of Public Improvements The Agency has not identified any commitment or obligation for long-term maintenance of the public improvements identified. The Agency will need to address this issue with the appropriate entity,public or private, who has benefited from or is involved in the ongoing preservation of the public improvement. The Agency expects to dedicate public improvements to the City. 35 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 198 of 265 700 ENFORCEMENT The administration and enforcement of this Plan, including the preparation and execution of any documents implementing this Plan, shall be performed by the Agency and/or the City. 800 DURATION OF THIS PLAN, TERMINATION,AND ASSET REVIEW The provisions of this Plan shall be effective, and the provisions of other documents formulated pursuant to this Plan, shall be effective for twenty(20)years from the effective date of the Plan subject to modifications and/or extensions set forth in Idaho Code §§ 50-2904 and 50-2905(7). The revenue allocation authority will expire on December 31, 2040, except for any revenue allocation proceeds received in calendar year 2041, as contemplated by Idaho Code § 50-2905(7). The Agency may use proceeds in 2041 to complete the projects set forth herein. As stated in the Plan, any owner participation agreement or disposition and development agreement obligations will cease as of December 31, 2040. Idaho Code § 50-2903(5) provides the Agency shall adopt a resolution of intent to terminate the revenue allocation area by September 1 of the termination year. In order to provide sufficient notice of termination to the affected taxing districts to allow them to benefit from the increased budget capacity, the Agency will use its best efforts to provide notice of its intent to terminate this Plan and its revenue allocation authority by May 1, 2041, or if the Agency determines an earlier terminate date, then by May I of the early termination year: a. When the Revenue Allocation Area plan budget estimates that all financial obligations have been provided for, the principal of and interest on such moneys, indebtedness, and bonds have been paid in full or when deposits in the special fund or funds created under this chapter are sufficient to pay such principal and interest as they come due, and to fund reserves, if any, or any other obligations of the Agency funded through revenue allocation proceeds shall be satisfied and the Agency has determined no additional project costs need be funded through revenue allocation financing, the allocation of revenues under Idaho Code § 50- 2908 shall thereupon cease; any moneys in such fund or funds in excess of the amount necessary to pay such principal and interest shall be distributed to the affected taxing districts in which the Revenue Allocation Area is located by the County Clerk in the same manner and proportion as the most recent distribution to the affected taxing districts of the taxes on the taxable property located within the Revenue Allocation Area; and the powers granted to the urban renewal agency under Idaho Code § 50-2909 shall thereupon terminate. b. In determining the termination date, the Plan shall recognize that the Agency shall receive allocation of revenues in the calendar year following the last year of the revenue allocation provision described in the Plan. C. For the fiscal year that immediately predates the termination date, the Agency shall adopt and publish a budget specifically for the projected revenues and 36 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 199 of 265 expenses of the Plan and make a determination as to whether the Revenue Allocation Area can be terminated before January 1 of the termination year pursuant to the terms of Idaho Code § 50-2909(4). In the event that the Agency determines that current tax year revenues are sufficient to cover all estimated expenses for the current year and all future years, by May 1, but in any event, no later than September 1, the Agency shall adopt a resolution advising and notifying the local governing body, the county auditor, and the State Tax Commission, recommending the adoption of an ordinance for termination of the Revenue Allocation Area by December 31 of the current year, and declaring a surplus to be distributed as described in Idaho Code § 50-2909 should a surplus be determined to exist. The Agency shall cause the ordinance to be filed with the office of the county recorder and the Idaho State Tax Commission as provided in Idaho Code § 63-215. Upon termination of the revenue allocation authority of the Plan to the extent the Agency owns or possesses any assets, the Agency shall dispose of any remaining assets by granting or conveying or dedicating such assets to the City. As allowed by Idaho Code § 50-2905(8), the Agency may retain assets or revenues generated from such assets as loans; the Agency shall have resources other than revenue allocation funds to operate and manage such assets. Similarly, facilities which provide a lease income stream to the Agency for full retirement of the facility debt will allow the Agency to meet debt services obligations and provide for the continued operation and management of the facility. For those assets which do not provide such resources or revenues, the Agency will likely convey such assets to the City, depending on the nature of the asset. 900 PROCEDURE FOR AMENDMENT OR MODIFICATION To the extent there are any outstanding loans or obligations, this Plan shall not be modified pursuant to the provisions set forth in Idaho Code § 50-2903A. Modification of this Plan results in a reset of the base value for the year immediately following the year in which the modification occurred to include the current year's equalized assessed value of the taxable property in the revenue allocation area, effectively eliminating the Agency's revenue stream as more fully set forth in Idaho Code § 50-2903A subject to certain limited exceptions contained therein, including the exception to allow an amendment to support growth of an existing commercial or industrial project. I.C. § 50-2903A(l)(a)(iv).. As more specifically identified above, the Agency's projections are based on estimated values, estimated levy rates, estimated future development, and estimated costs of future construction/improvements. Annual adjustments as more specifically set forth in the Agency's annual budget will be required to account for more/less estimated revenue and prioritization of projects. Any adjustments for these stated purposes are technical and ministerial and are not deemed a modification under Idaho Code § 50-2903A(l)(a)(i). 37 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 200 of 265 1000 SEVERABILITY If any one or more of the provisions contained in this Plan to be performed on the part of the Agency shall be declared by any court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, then such provision or provisions shall be null and void and shall be deemed separable from the remaining provisions in this Plan and shall in no way affect the validity of the other provisions of this Plan. 1100 ANNUAL REPORT AND OTHER REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Under the Law, the Agency is required to file with the City, on or before March 31 of each year, a report of the Agency's activities for the preceding calendar year, which report shall include a complete financial statement setting forth its assets, liabilities, income, and operating expenses as of the end of such calendar year. This annual report shall be considered at a public meeting to report these findings and take comments from the public. Additionally, the Agency must comply with certain other reporting requirements as set forth in Idaho Code § 67-450E, the local government registry portal, Idaho Code § 50-2913, the tax commission plan repository, and Idaho Code § 50-2903A, the tax commission's plan modification annual attestation. Failure to report the information requested under any of these statutes results in significant penalties, including loss of increment revenue, and the imposition of other compliance measures by the Ada County Board of County Commissioners. 1200 APPENDICES,ATTACHMENTS, EXHIBITS, TABLES All attachments and tables referenced in this Plan are attached and incorporated herein by their reference. All other documents referenced in this Plan but not attached are incorporated by their reference as if set forth fully. 38 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 201 of 265 Attachment 1 Project Area and Revenue Allocation Area Boundary Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 202 of 265 Attachment 2 Legal Description of Project Area and Revenue Allocation Area An area consisting of approximately 16 acres as more particularly described as follows: Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 203 of 265 Attachment 3 Properties (Public and/or Private)Which May Be Acquired by Agency 1. Properties which may be subject to acquisition by the Agency included parcels to: a) assemble with adjacent parcels to facilitate development and/or redevelopment; b) assemble with adjacent rights-of-way to improve configuration and enlarge parcels for development and/or redevelopment; c) reconfigure sites for development and possible extension of streets or pathways d) assemble for future transfer to qualified developers to facilitate the development of mixed-use, residential, commercial, office and retail areas. e) assemble for the construction of certain public improvements, including but not limited to streets, streetscapes, water and sewer improvements, environmental and floodplain remediation/site preparation,public parking, community and recreation facilities,parks,pedestrian/bike paths and trails, and open space. 2. The Agency reserves the right to acquire any additional right-of-way or access routes near or around existing or planned rights-of-way. 3. The Agency reserves the right to acquire property needed to provide adequately sized sites for high priority projects for the development of public improvements (the exact location of which has not been determined). 4. Other parcels may be acquired for the purpose of facilitating catalyst or demonstration projects, constructing public parking, constructing new streets or pathways, enhancing public spaces, or to implement other elements of the urban renewal plan strategy and/or the Plan for the Project Area. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 204 of 265 Attachment 4 Map Depicting Expected Land Uses and Current Zoning Within Revenue Allocation Area and Project Area Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 205 of 265 Attachment 5 Economic Feasibility Study 4840-3668-4470,v.4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 206 of 265 UNION DISTRICT CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO E PINE AVE z K z m m m EZ N w �7 D z ;U 0 z 0 z x 0 S 803829"E 464.8 ' v .................................... E IDAHO AVE "� s;:? ::::;:;:`2 ::;: c::;ii:`.;::i::ii:`.iiii ii:`.: i}iir7.•ii:•i:•i:•:ii•::•isi:i•:�s?i:•a::ii::(.:i:_i:??ii.{:ii:i::c:�: ....:................................................................. ........... .............................................. ........... Ln ::•:::•::•:::•:::•:•i:•isi•::•i:•::•i:•i:•iii:•::•i::::::::•:::::::::: M 0 O ` :1: V N S 8804224"E 380.05' a, E BR OADWAY AVE :::. Ln :. c 2 �., M :•.. 0 O .................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................... .................................. .... ........:::...... :::::.:.... .......................•:.............................:.E ATLRf�AD::.................:::.:::•. .................................................................................................................................... ....�..p.y.�.......................................................................................................................... �:a'•Z?'.�ii:rii}Fiiir}r::}iii:::i�iiri?i:}?}}:i:'.::•i:i�}i:i:?i�iiiiiii{ifif�F.i�}?:::iii�?i}iii�:::i.ii:.:iii:i.:?i:.}7}:.:i�7iF.iiiii?i:P ...................................:.... •::•:::::::::::::::::.:�:::.�::::.�:::::::.�.�::: ................... / N 88030'191,W 831.04' y3o01;,�6 1 �ti9 G a 11574 7 V6 CO,,! 13 1218 7 E FRANKLIN RD ??�+OF j9� ------ 89°32'43"W 1328.12' ------ �'.�BE NTS PROJECT: OWNER/DEVELOPER: DWG# 2030 S. WASHINGTON AVE. UNION DISTRICT EMMETT,ID 83617 120018-EX ANNEXATION EXHIBIT BILL TRUAX �� P: (208)398-8104 PROJECT# MERIDIAN,ID. F. (208)398-8105 120018 SEC, 7, T3N, R1E, B.M. 208-914-6131 S�4WMQr ADA COUNTY, IDAHO SHEET DATE: 2/2020 1-0ns5urveyinq,LLC WWW.SAWTOOTHLS.COM 1 OF 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 207 of 265 5awtooth Land Surveying, LLC 5w o�T P: (208) 398-8 1 04 F: (208) 398-8 1 05 2030 5. Washington Ave., Emmett, ID 83G 17 De-Annexation & Annexation Legal Description for Union District A tract of land consisting of approximately 15.90 acres being a portion of Section 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Section Corner common to Sections 12 and 13 of Township 3 North, Range 1 West and Sections 7 and 18 of Township 3 North, Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian,thence along the section line common to said Sections 12 and 13, being the centerline of Franklin Road North 89°32'43" West 1328.12 feet to the East 1/16th Corner on said section line; thence North 53°01'09" East, 2291.26 feet to the intersection of the southerly right of way of Union Pacific Railroad and the westerly right of way of N. Main St. and the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 0'33'11" East, coincident with said westerly right of way of N. Main St., 639.69 feet to the northerly right of way of E. Broadway Ave.; thence South 88°42'24"East, coincident with said northerly right of way of E. Broadway Ave., 380.05 feet to the westerly right of way of E. 2nd St.; thence North 0°33'15"East, coincident with said westerly right of way of E. 2nd St., 336.24 feet to the northerly right of way of E. Idaho Ave.; thence South 88°38'29"East, coincident with said northerly right of way of E. Idaho Ave.,464.82 feet to the easterly right of way of E. 3rd St.; thence South 1°21'54"West, coincident with said easterly right of way of E. 31d St., 978.24 feet to said southerly right of way of Union Pacific Railroad; thence North 88'30'19"West, coincident with said southerly right of way of Union Pacific Railroad, 831.04 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. L 0 G1S ERF G a115740 'P fIf I ll o 4rF OF vFFF BEAG�'� P : \ 2020 \ 1 EMT\ 120018 - MERIDIAN STATION DE AN N EXAT10N \ Survey \ Drawings \ Descriptions \ 1 23018 - de - a ;sr" exation ' egal . docxB . doc Page 11 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 208 of 265 Zoning L-0 kI-L H I P I OGI ELY.'A e _ I_ EvElml ;Tm LU —W-BROA WAY AVE 2T 0 BOWER ST- LU { �0 nrmmF LO z Legend Parcels � E KINGm Railroad Future Land Uses � Medium Density Residential a z Industrial 2� Civic E STATE AVE �l� H I I E7 Old Town 6 Mixed Use Community —M f= E-I INE=AVE h 0 1 i hl LLL z F- W) Z h N'! F W N = d H 1!J �"' Z W-tDAHO-AVE- }Z W --- - 0 3 E IDAHO-AVE- -Z M N�Z h Z Z - j1 W W-BROADWAY AVE Z F -LI W-E BROADWAY AVE LU = • Z n W RAILROAD ST_Z i 0 W BOWER:ST --E-BOWER ST- �O W W = 9y z LO , z� Legend 0 ---- E ADA-ST-N- J N I- W N� Z Lj %,; Urban Renewal District W TAYLOR AVE �Z, ❑ Parcels a� �_EKING-ST- } Railroad Z IIH! 0 250 50Feet Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 210 of 265 ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY STUDY ATTACHMENT 5.1 Public Improvements within the Revenue Allocation Area This Attachment includes a statement listing the kind, number, and proposed location of all proposed public works or improvements proposed to be installed within the Project Area, together with the estimated costs of such improvements pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-2905. This Attachment also sets forth a finding as to the economic feasibility of the proposed Project recognizing the specific assumptions used in the modeling, including a description of the methods of financing the estimated project costs, the timing of development and cash flow analysis. As more fully set forth in the Plan, the proposed Project to be funded by revenue allocation funds includes fully improved streets, utilities, and other public rights-of-way amenities, as well as park and open spaces, a community center and associated public parking facilities and/or structures. The Meridian Development Corporation ("MDC") Public Improvement List set forth below identifies with specificity needed investments to support private investment in capital facilities. Capital facilities generally have long useful lives and significant costs. The overall Project and the infrastructure to support it are all consistent with the vision articulated in the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan and as required in City development regulations. The cost estimates provided by architects and consulting engineers are based upon prices for similar construction in the broader area for 2020 and have not been adjusted for inflation. Estimated costs proposed to be incurred in implementing the Plan are as follows: Public Improvement List Proposed Public Infrastructure, Including Engineering, Design, Installation, Construction, and/or Reconstruction of: Improvements to 3rd Street Improvements to Broadway Avenue Intersection Improvements and Rail Crossing Safety Enhancements Pedestrian Improvements Streetscape Improvements Sewer Infrastructure Improvements Water Infrastructure Improvements Electrical Distribution Improvements Right-of-Way Landscaping Improvements Utility Relocations Lateral Relocation and Improvements Attachment 5 - 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 211 of 265 Irrigation and Drainage Improvements Sub-total $1,215,000 Additional Public Parking Facilities and Open Space $1,510,000 Civic Block Improvements Civic Block Site Improvements $1,615,000 Structured Public Parking $4,250,000 Sub-Total $5,865,000 Community Center Construction $6,450,000 City of Meridian Community Center Contribution ($3,000,000) Net Project Area Cost Construction $3,450,000 Total Civic Block and Structure Parking Cost $12,315,0001 Grand Total $12,040,000 It is understood the estimated costs detailed above will change over the life of the Plan due to inflation, further project refinement, timing and bidding. The cost estimates are a necessary assumption in determining economic feasibility and are estimates for the purpose of financial planning. Based on the assumptions made in the Study, the Project Area is estimated to generate $16,286,437 in tax increment/revenue allocation proceeds between 2020 and 2040. Initial urban renewal planning costs are estimated to be funded by a $75,000 interfund loan from MDC. Additionally, the Study assumes a $3,000,000 contribution from the City to support the construction of the proposed community center. The City's anticipated contribution is from Parks and Recreation impact fees that have been collected for a community center. At this time the City has not obligated any funds from impact fees or the general fund for the proposed community center. The estimated total resources for the Project are estimated to be $19,361,437. As identified above, there are presently$12,040,000 of estimated total Project Costs related to the Project after the City of Meridian's contribution. The feasibility analysis assumes Projects will be implemented and advance-funded by property owners and/or ' Includes City Community Center Contribution. Attachment 5 - 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 212 of 265 developers. For purposes of Idaho Code § 50-2905 and the Study, it is assumed that any owner or developer participant in the Project will be reimbursed with tax increment/revenue allocation proceeds through an owner participation agreement (OPA) negotiated by and between MDC and any owner and/or developer participant. Based on information from MDC staff, MDC currently administers OPAs in existing project areas utilizing 75% or 90% reimbursement to the owner or developer participant from tax increment/revenue allocation proceeds. In analyzing the economic feasibility of the proposed Project, an assumption of a 75/25 split is used recognizing the actual split will be subject to any negotiated OPA. For purposes of determining economic feasibility of the Project, administrative costs (District Operating Expenses) over the 20-year life of the Project Area are estimated to be $968,105 or approximately 6% of total estimated revenue. This amount was calculated using the assumption of 10% of annual tax increment/revenue allocation proceeds for administration of the Project Area or $50,000 per year. The actual amount of administrative costs will be set forth and determined in the MDC's annual budget; however, for purposes of economic feasibility an estimate of costs is necessary. The initial interfund loan from MDC for preliminary Project Area costs is estimated in the Study to be repaid at 5%simple interest for a total obligation of$112,500. Considering the estimated revenue allocation proceeds over the life of the Project Area less the estimated Project costs, there is estimated to be a $100,000 positive balance of at the end of the 20-year term, rendering the Project economically feasible. Attachments 5.3 and 5.4 provide detailed information concerning revenue estimates and cash flow analysis. In analyzing the methods of financing, secure funding includes revenue allocation funds and is money the MDC is highly likely to receive should private development occur within the Project Area. The funds may not be in the MDC's possession at the beginning of the Plan period, but it is virtually certain MDC will receive the funds should private development proceed as proposed. MDC may need to take specific actions to generate the funding, but those actions are within its powers. Despite the high probability of secure funding, no Project can proceed until a specific, enforceable funding plan is in place. Potential funding is money that might be received by the MDC over the life of the Project Area. It is funding the MDC is eligible for and exists under current law; however, each potential funding source requires one or more additional steps or decisions before the MDC can obtain the resources, and the ultimate decision is outside of the MDC's independent control. The proposed City capital contribution to the community center and grant funds are examples of potential funding. Additionally, the issuance of bonds is not anticipated in this analysis. Potential funding is not assumed in determining economic feasibility. Attachment 5 - 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 213 of 265 Unfunded Projects, or portions of Projects are those lacking secure or potential funding. Unfunded Projects are not considered or assumed in determining economic feasibility. It is generally understood, the amount of tax increment/revenue allocation contributed to the Project will vary from the assumptions and estimates used in the economic feasibility study depending upon actual revenue and the actual cost of the Projects. Other sources of funding for Projects may include, but are not limited to: • Local Improvement Districts (LID) • Business Improvement Districts (BID) • Development Impact Fees • Franchise Fees Grants from federal, state, local, regional agencies and/or private entities Other bonds, notes and/or loans Summary of Estimated Cost of Operations and Improvements by Year Based on Assumptions (2020-2041) Year Secure Funding Potenti District MDC Loan OPA Debt Total Project (TIF al Operating Debt Service Service(75%) Liabilities & Fundin Expenses @ 2.65% MDC Loan) g 2020 $75,000 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 2021 $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 2022 $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 2023 $447,366 $0 $44,737 $40,000 $335,525 $420,261 2024 $456,578 $0 $48,368 $45,000 $342,434 $435,802 2025 $823,409, $0 $50,000 $27,500 $617,557 $695,057 2026 $840,141 $0 $50,000 $0 $630,106 $680,106 2027 $857,207 $0 $50,000 $0 $643,475 $693,475 2028 $874,615 $0 $50,000 $0 $824,615 $874,615 2029 $892,371 $0 $50,000 $0 $842,371 $892,371 2030 $910,482 $0 $50,000 $0 $860,482 $910,482 2031 $928,955 $0 $50,000 $0 $878,955 $928,955 2032 $947,797 $0 $50,000 $0 $897,797 $947,797 2033 $967,016 $0 $50,000 $0 $917,016 $967,016 2034 $986,619 $0 $50,000 $0 $936,619 $986,619 2035 $1,006,614 $0 $50,000 $0 $956,615 $1,006,615 2036 $1,027,008 $0 $50,000 $0 $977,008 $1,027,008 2037 $1,047,811 $0 $50,000 $0 $997,811 $1,047,811 2038 $1,069,029 $0 $50,000 $0 $1,019,029 $1,069,029 2039 $1,090,672 $0 $50,000 $0 $1,040,672 $1,090,672 2040 $1,112,747 $0 $50,000 $0 $1,462,746 $1,512,746 2041 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 Total $16,361,437 $0 $968,105 $112,500 $15,180,833 $16,261,437 Attachment 5 -4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020- Page 214 of 265 ATTACHMENT 5.2 Determination of Economic Feasibility Based on Assumptions Based upon reasonable assumptions and recognizing MDC's ability to prioritize Projects in its budget and negotiate the terms of any owner participation agreement with an owner and/or developer, the Plan is deemed to be economically feasible as the estimated revenue in the Project Area exceeds the estimated Project costs. The economic feasibility of the Plan is based, in part, on the following factors: • The value of new taxable private development proposed in the Project Area • The timing of the proposed taxable development • The nature of the propose taxable development • The amount of tax increment/revenue allocation proceeds to be generated by proposed development • The estimated cost of public improvement projects in 2020 dollars • That the Projects are assumed to be advance funded by any owner or developer in the Project Area to be reimbursed with tax increment/revenue allocation proceeds over time pursuant to negotiated owner participation agreements. • If estimated revenue projections equal or exceed estimated project costs, the Plan is deemed to be economically feasible. The following is a summary of the analysis and estimates of the factors used to determine the economic feasibility of the MDC Union District Urban Renewal Plan. Attachments 5.3 and 5.4 provide a more detailed outlook on the revenues and expenses in determining economic feasibility. The following assumptions were used in Attachments 5.3 and 5.4 to support of finding the Project meets the requirements of economic feasibility: o Land Value Increases @ 1%/Yr. o Improvement Value Increases @ 2%/Yr. o Applicable Levy Rate is reduced from the 2019 certified applicable levy rates by an estimated 10% and held constant through the life of the Plan and Project Area. The Applicable Levy Rate does not include any exempted levies as identified in Idaho Code § 50-2908 o Total estimated Cost of Improvements over the life of the project: $12,040,000, after the City of Meridian's contribution to the community center in the amount of$3,000,000 o Attachment 5.4 assumes 75% of the annual available tax increment/revenue allocation will be committed to reimburse an owner Attachment 5 - 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 215 of 265 or developer for advance-funded public improvements. It is understood and recognized the actual reimbursement percentage is a term to be negotiated under any OPA o Attachment 5.4 provides for "Additional Principal" payments to any owner or developer if sufficient funds are available and provided for in any OPA In summary, based on the assumptions as set forth in Attachments 5.1 and 5.2, and as supported by Attachments 5.3 and 5.4, it is evident the Project will generate adequate revenue within the Project Area to fund the necessary Projects rendering the Project economically feasible. 4852-5500-2807,v.7 Attachment 5 - 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 216 of 265 E NDIAN --- IDAHO PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING AGENDA Planning and Zoning Public Hearing Outline and Presentations Meeting Notes: Planning c Zoning Commission �44eeting Apri( 16, 2020 � r �y 1■■1■■1■1� .1 � - ■1 ■1■■IY� � _ _ ��� i1i■llliiR�� - - _ _ �MEN MENEM ip oil • F u■ 1 i■1� �I�11 =1 a IININI � � � • • � IIII: �R f��� `�;; J��ulrrr morn � • • i • ; , , .:� - - ■■1■1 ■■ - illllll -. ■IIIIIIIIN(L -�*f�Ir Y r■(�!■ rrrllr '" � _ . 1■1■1■ - � illllll :: �I111111111■ ■ ♦ 1■1111 •� • ■Illlll �-irlillrlrl ,. �':: p�, - ■ � tii■■ +!■ / � �#all■111 - : Illllli -- � ;,�. ■11■1■ loll 11 IBM 111111Ir0 11111111111■ ■■ I wl �.■ll111r1l1 `, u, . ' 1"111 im O■1 ■1�1f111!l17�11l1■7■ � a �i11 ■■a� ►IIIIIIrIt�f�llpl■IIr G - . � _ � "�"' �r � 1► 'i� �� 1411111nillr!!llr��=1 ■■ i - 1 IIIII � � 1■ � � '�� '� � ► � gig ` j i� ■ •�■ ,� Illlrll -r �■ r i -� ■ - ■ ■ ■ ■ a 9i11111111111 � � ���*♦� �i� ■ N �Illr .r � �IIr111111111 *I� - � .. ■� �41�, ' - r son pp � . ■�It s■1 _ � 11 . � � �► � 'r!i ��- ��rA■A■111 -� =,,f•' . ',•• � � ' T�,`-_'yieF� 1- . . : 1�■■1���/Ii1 I��I ��__�� �r � *i■iN ,Jdon on #� i"' r, r �•..�.: - �.�; , , • WOMEN r 111r f �■ ON MIN �■ ■: .. .. -■ - :�� �i i #��*fir*� ►**� rl■ i_:� af�fi2 ■1■■1 ■ - ...:■.� ■�■ IA►if 1f�■■: ice is i*i■ �r }'' �� ` .r ` +' _ _. ... ■■■■■ �1■1■ ■■ - ■ sm F MINI ■ ���r■1■■! �■�■ ris■ ■■ _ � -1 -. ., - � - , ' r; � :. ■ ■■ - ■1■Itt - 11■111■■1■ - _■ i S'1111111 ' ■ ■__ - ■rl � � .:}: . .. ! .. .:^^ ■■ _ - _■ ■ fi'fi ■ ■ is1 =i _ W IAr■ r ,- . a r. ;y..'Y - _ ? ■ i. " . ■■ ■1■! - ■■■■■■n, -- ■ ■■■■■ ■ ■- 11■■�I • loll t ■ . ■■ - 111 = 11 ■■■ � i!i ■■ ■ii#� iili 11i11 :y►1 _i - � �Il1 'i k', _ ■ ; ,"',. � ■ ■ 1■IIII■ _! ■ �• 11 + ■■ -�A IAANIra� - rll r _ ■ - ■ - - : �■�A��IIIIIIIV :��i= ■11 w, - -_..+ I' m W ■ 1■111■ IIII III -■ _ ■ ■ rlrrrr 1 $� � u■ _ Ili ■ ■� 1■1■ r ■I IIIII - IIIII ' a■ IIrIr!■ �illllilllr►� ,.+ !Y■■ f1■1 i■! ■ ■ IIII! II IIIII = - ■�1111 i�� ■ice IIII■ ?; lillllll = ■�! ■rl V ■molls ��■1■ r111■�, 1#Illlll - : ■11 t. 1■/tea■■�� uulal . ..llullnAAmw W ■■■■■ III _■■ :■'lll _ a V TI O go-III II I I II■■ti - � - I �� � sl I I■- -•■ ■II■■■ �- ■loom 1 : _ . I .I■ ■ _ . Itll . . iii 1+ _ ' 7 f iT WProposed Zoning Ww �Orw'" R-8 "J AC* f CUM TAM �R pow or om;mwm w uor 4 am t �i k NIS " &UAC* r R- 1 5 R-4 JUF JL ML=A RQ hu . � s_ * a Mr JL - -srt �a+r �s �rr s,tW! �y yf Rl 4.iY/ V �.rb'M'la b'rl�reT4+M&.. r , ------------ r !!! Preliminary Plat/Landscape Plan y y ! J.�irf�rwor � l.R�rtl R!'I\+•F.0 �, nr •. 4 Vllf*L pwvoG■f- PfUX ffT racy FER WIN ,NN 100 MP r - ,•�Y�rw R � 1 YS.d�.�M}•J�l� 1/JG�bW ratli r�...ter-^-__--- MMr4�i �a/,i �"�;M�•�a •ter Y _ ;� f iY•,•{ �r.r•.r—} +,Mr.rt r.r wr nrR ++Yw. �, ��'y� h•w I •�i+ s�R'raa r.4 ��y�tnlq�!� j - - ....•.yp T ■ way f ., � �FS� r r 1 b' V�RIHIY rt 1•!!CZ 131 1'Iu),"R 10M,10uh , l a a 4 � w w � Y 4 � Y • � � �• f 4' • # w •! •} � Y 4 !•f� • • ! J Possible Conceptual Development Plan for Parcel to the North ' � 1 _ Possible Future Development Pattern IL F DR CL IE OVA f Q r' si I . C:-G E -raAxstav&R — - C:-G 0 ' mp� m Ppdnm Fo dW WkV *•,•ti'� o. 4rrmmpm4w "Ib M110 i ti■ + 1'■�R� WL M *L!■M+ tiRr 4mp f t Aft ELF�■' I — x RPM sp■w"owRMEOW w now m4 *MR V~� i 1 t.:9d L I �� ■ ■ i +. L4 4 A 1 ii1- f V/ LIr 4W --.L Jasmine Y , T-�- r Mu �Ih�■F ii■�li�i On-Street Parking Exhibit 4� ■ t # I r . Y # 4 } p f r58 parking in .} + spaces .+OPEN" ++.�1■4 x Ii u� i ■ OW 1AW YL I {{ Y A `■ _ I .. rIom frlw� WOO Vol fill:L ON L i r F• .. � � .3 � .. .a Lf F. w � * I ■ ■ a s _979 L + t• t f ! -f � - � i - i. .t —i t f t y t� t � # a * — — � � � r — � — t — a � � � � : Qualified Open Space Exhibit a & Site Amenities Proposed Arrrenities: Large 2f 3•Acre Neighborhood Park The large park will contain the t�- .v1ng recreation Fac Shade Structure Plsy Structure Seating areas with benches Climbing Dome Climbing Bouldars I Public Art I 4 - I Lhal MM, 3 ULMO Sul101v1SION 1.17 acres of qualified open OPEN SPACE EhhYaR space without crossed out area RESIDEKTIAL AREA-III AS ACRES quALR UNC OPEN SWE-R 1.23 ACRES 110 VW _ Nate: The crossed out area does not count tolvard the minimum qualified open space standards because it isn't accessible at the west end, per UDC 11-3G-3B.I e. I' . 1 pp— Ilk, �1 f pm � � Now F_ r a moo i be i I. Conceptual Building Elevations Single-Family Detached Homes #ROPO�SED MOM ELE VAT MI A14D 14OL7S NOSTTLE5At r r r dP in.-A '77" a e all"Mot IN= . - y. -ME y T - man imam - _Sir pvp { ISE JFL -'- �: + ' Wei %. ' +jp- i• r __ Preliminary Plat N6339'12'E 727.7O' 744n �a�oc' SLOP' �a cn' s,.dP' E�.IP' BLOCIf4 BLAC' 1 I 8 8 T 5 ` 5 4 3 2IF; -", 1 1 a 1 $ 2 3 4 .g .31 F g II*W aF Skip� rL1+Cr $ �+u 1t $ MO F $ r,4a SF n MI sF I'm 5F a s+�5 9F g e%1 sF I p 42.4d u.o7 fapd' S,.40' Sa cu' 7a.ny Si.OP' +s.aat = tA d+r:7 yIAC' 573,' 1447 SFr8 � s a Eoeuwsre�r $�.W 131+ti am z" 10 5w sr1 ! 3h_----_—___wllun._ ,nocn' HI ng IW m RSd 1 169F ]®Er # 1'.56' 1d466 I aIN ZF h I BLOOf 3 - =845 3F ;� I 51 sari SF _ MCI' e000 ao zs m I o4•.w o-,em' I w I redw '71n�' @LCC14 2 d 8 $ 12 $ # � 5784 W $ 14 # I 1 41.67 G/lY 45. R{1Y ldxdd' lnn nlf L1.'++ R�' I ,loud- ,41n<r $ 12 2 1 3 e 44IM 5F WN sr `¢' 9 �I 'JI1 SF 7+4!w A 1000. L # swo BF g em4 sr g I 1w a� — — wagazbo'E ss�.2s' I W loom g >�4n g' Y} +i6 4 Q 0..RF cl c p qW1�sF W4 sF eoas 4 71 "2 12 6 aI 9 q�.BLOa7 1,042. . y +0I4 7 LI J — I lG $ # 8 ,a.w'15cxo 1 +0.117 pI■ I _ VALE a+Fr v = BlOOL 3 = T 'n.uv roaaa' e,sv s 1 It ,_u # $ teeE f $ aool a 1 .1 SE o q 5 1 Ot.os' 1 I 04DP W I „.n,' r60.W 'ro.n7 BlO0L2 I a1 lr I +4a� ,dxOP' � 12 I � I 9LAU4 5 ww� soaa SF g soou>t k1 S o 6 R N ti ffi I R COW" c � +aae SF -w SF it Sall" 1 '610Y ,07cn icn an' Y04' 1 S1 o I 1 r I e.�� 2.P7 ,dd Ce' ,aloe' 13 ! I x leee+a�r y}[� __ F, 1 }3d+ t §.%' ,. Me+r_17.--=— a ---4ae+F- — ----- ------7'S,m+SF—'---- dx a1 cc—t.~--f 1 q$2, odwLUra 5 rr E —— wwoR _ T— eawon — — 1 5 U.93' I FG.aF' xx.4d L.W +L5- !9.23' EJl1�f£STY.fff OF �2! 77.BS 40,C. 40A 401%, W.M' 40 ' 40,5' 4uA[' 4QA6' 44.4Y 40.¢' wac' +d.dC' id.W i4.r' 1 I I I \ 1 g xl1C]CYL S i9M/CHO� W 0�R ' � mrr BW R I 15 a 1 S $ 14 1 3 1 1 2 -9 1 1 9 10 9 8 S 7 fi 5 8 4 'r3 3 2 i 21M9 sF g �5F 8 •YC4 u a -wd s -wO sF g 4m sF$ +wo sF 8 woo>r g ,eac sr g 4POO sF 8 woo 5F 8 +wo$r g ,eat iF g ,Pau OF� 4DOG SF{� -M 5F=a ww 9 aI4 — �Ril' �� U� U� - a11YJ — — •1 nr( �LYl U.d-0'T —aPaP' 1]nP a1� W.�JC 25:7T —4C.1P' L — — —� — — —� aLY:Y _ ——— — — 5WdW3OV 1 204.02' r s {D 40 LFY IL T ■ # ..�.� I .... _1 ---� .-- i ilk■► 1��, � �'. I I -tol #-. I'1� r±7¢ �— ASO n 167"51 A -5 1 [ dp IS 1 .� 0 �IRa Changes to Agenda: None Item 4A,413 and 4C: Urban Renewal Plan for the Union District Urban Renewal Project and First Amendment to the Meridian Revitalization Plan Application(s): ➢ NA Size of property,existing zoning,and location: This site consists of 16 acres of land, zoned Old Town, north of the railroad tracks, east of Main Street,west of NE 31d Street and south of E. Idaho Avenue. Adjacent Land Use&Zoning: Varies; industrial to the east and south; government, religious and quasi-public, retail and restaurants to the north and retail and city hall to the west. History: This area is currently within an urban renewal district that was established in 2002. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Old Town Summary of Request: Request is to de-annex from the current Downtown District Plan and establish a new Union District. Written Testimony: Lindsey Bowshier and Meridian Chamber of Commerce. Both in support. Staff Recommendation:Approval of Resolution#PZ-20-01 and#PZ-20-02 as it is presented as it is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public input, I move to approve Resolution Nos. PZ-20-01 and PZ-20-02,as presented: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public input, I move to deny Resolution No. PZ-20-01 and PZ-20-02,for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue the subject topic to the hearing date of(insert continued hearing date here)for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s)for continuance) Item#5A: Delano Subdivision (H-2019-0027) Application(s): • Annexation &Zoning • Preliminary Plat Size of property,existing zoning,and location: This site consists of 15.21 acres of land,zoned RUT in Ada County, located at 2800 & 14120 W. Jasmine Ln. History: This project was originally heard by the Commission on May 2&July 18, 2019;at the hearing on July 18th, the Commission voted to recommend denial of the project to City Council. The Council heard the project on November 12th&voted to remand the project back to the Commission to address the density issue of the proposed development and for Commission's review of a revised plat with changes to lots along the northern boundary of the subdivision that front on E. Della Street consisting of single-story, detached homes and the loss of(1)buildable lot. The revised plans before you tonight are the result of discussions at the City Council hearing and meetings with the neighbors. The revisions include a reduction in the number of buildable lots from 85 to 66;a change to the proposed zoning—the portion of the site along the north&west boundaries previously proposed to be zoned R-15 is now R-8,and a change to the conceptual building elevations. Since the hearing at City Council in November, the City adopted a new Comp Plan which included an amendment to the FLUM that assigned an MU-R designation to the majority of the property that lies east of the proposed Centrepointe Way,therefore, the previous application for an amendment to the FLUM is no longer needed&has been withdrawn. This area was formerly in the City of Boise's planning area but last October Boise's City Council approved a resolution to amend the land use map of Blueprint Boise to transfer this area from Boise's AOCI to the City of Meridian's AOCI boundary since Meridian is able to provide water&sewer services to the property. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: MDR(3-8 units/acre)on the west side of Centrepointe&MU-R(Mixed Use-Regional)on the east side of Centrepointe) Summary of Request: The Applicant requests annexation&zoning of 3.31 acres of land with R-8 zoning for the portion of the site adjacent to the north &west boundaries with R-15 zoning of the 8.12 acres directly to the south &east of the R-8 portion;the 5 acres on the east side of the proposed extension of Centrepointe Way is proposed to be zoned R-40.The proposed zoning is consistent with the proposed development plan and the FLUM designations for the site.The east *Preliminary plat consisting of 66 SFR building lots for the development of SFR detached homes at a gross density of 5.7 units/acre, 1 building lot for a future 96-unit MFR development(for which a concept plan is depicted on the landscape plan)at a gross density of 27 units/acre, 8 common lots&2 other lots for common driveways on 15.22 acres of land. The plat is proposed to develop in 3 phases—the 1 st phase is on the west side of the proposed Centrepointe Way&will include the extension of N. Dashwood PI.at the north boundary through the site to Centrepointe;the 2nd phase is on the west side of the development; and the 3rd phase is the multi-family on the east side of Centrepointe—this plan is conceptual and the use will require approval of a subsequent CUP. Staff recommends N. Centrepoint Way is extended to the north boundary of the site along with construction of the street buffer and detached sidewalk on the east side of N. Centrepoint Way with the 1 st phase of development. This will allow the connection to Wainwright Drive to occur sooner if the Wong property redevelops before the MFR portion of the site develops. Many letters of testimony have been received from adjacent residential property owners to the north regarding the amount of traffic that will be generated from the proposed development and routed thro gh their neighborhood. For this reason, it's imperative that the Centrepointe Way connection to Wainwright occur as soon as possible The Applicant provided a concept drawing showing how development could possibly occur on the Wong parcel with the extension of Centrepointe to the north to Wainwright consistent with the MSM in the location proposed on this site. One access is proposed on either side of Centrepointe Way, a collector street; and an emergency only/pedestrian access is ro osed from the extension of N. Dashwood PI.at the north boundary of the site.A stub street is proposed to the parcel to the west for access and future extension. Public streets are proposed within the SFR portion of the development with 27-foot wide street sections; private drive aisles will be provided within the MFR portion of the development. In accord with UDC 11-3A-3,which limits access points to collector streets to improve safety and requires access to be taken from a local street if available, Staff recommends N. Dashwood PI. is extended as a full access street into the site with the first phase of development. Note:ACHD approved the connection of Dashwood Ave. to the existing stub street to the north(Dashwood PI.)as a temporary emergency access/pedestrian connection until Centrepointe Way is extended to Wainwright Dr., or within 10 years, whichever occurs first. When Centrepointe Way is extended to Wainwright Dr., Dashwood Pl. will be reconstructed as a public street for vehicular connectivity to Wainwright Dr. UDC 11-3A-3A.3 requires all subdivisions to provide local street access to any use that currently takes direct access from an arterial or collector street.The parcel to the east of the property proposed to be zoned R-40 on the east side of Centrepointe Way, currently takes direct access via N. Eagle Rd./SH-69, an arterial street and a State Highway; therefore, Staff recommends local street access(or a driveway with a cross-access easement) is provided to the property to the east as set forth in the UDC.The Applicant should coordinate with the developer of that property on a location for the access street/driveway. 7'wide street sections are proposed which only allow parking on one side of the street—a parking plan was submitted that e onstrates the amount of available on-street parking (58 spaces)as well as the location of such. A 20'wide landscaped street buffer is required along Centrepoint Way, a collector street.A minimum 10%qualified open space is eq fired to be provided for the overall development along with (1)site amenity. The applicant is proposing 10.8%on the SFR portion of the site consisting of a 0.69 acre park with amenities, parkways, linear open space&a collector street buffer. Because the MFR portion of the site is separated from the SFR portion of the site by a collector street&the development plan is conceptual at this time,staff recommends as a DA provision that the 10% open space is provided on that portion of the site at the time of development in addition to the open space required in the specific use standards for MFR developments. A shade structure, children's play structure, climbing dome, climbing boulders, seating benches&public art are proposed as qualified amenities,which exceed UDC standards. The Nourse Lateral runs along the northern boundary of this site and is piped.An easement should be depicted on the plat for the waterway if one exists. If there is an easement&the width is 10' or greater, it should be located within a common lot that is a minimum 20-feet wide and outside of a fenced area unless modified by City Council. he elevations shown are the original elevations New conceptual building elevations were submitted for the SFR detached homes as shown; all SFR homes al2j the west&north perimeter boundaries of the development will be restricted to a single-story in p p 9 ry height as proposed by the Applicant. The concept elevations for the apartments didn't change. Written Testimony: • Many letters of testimony have been submitted on this application both on the original plans and the revised plans(see public record) • Hethe Clark,Applicant(response to the staff report)—In agreement w/staff report except for two(2) items: 1) Requests a modification to DA provision#1.d to not restrict the homes along the west boundary of the subdivision to a single-story as previously proposed to allow 2-story homes to be constructed; and 2)deletion of condition#2b which requires construction of the 20'wide street buffer and detached sidewalk along the east side of Centrepoint to be constructed with the 1It phase of development to be deferred until the multi-family portion of the site develops. Staff Recommendation: Approval with the requirement of a DA per the provisions in the Staff Report Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to recommend approval to the City Council of File Number H- 2019-0027, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 16, 2020,with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to recommend denial to the City Council of File Number H-2019- 0027, as presented during the hearing on April 16, 2020,for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2019-0027 to the hearing date of(insert continued hearing date here)for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s)for continuance) E IDIAN IDAHO 10morw PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING Agenda Item Number: 5 A Item Title: Public Hearing for Delano Subdivision (H-2019-0027 Request: Annexation and Zoning of 15.22 acres of land with R- 8 (2.76 acres), R-15 (8.82 acres) and R-40 (3.64 acres) zoning districts; and Request: A Preliminary Plat consisting of 66 single-family residential building lots, 1 building lot for future multi-family development, 8 commons area lots and 2 other (common driveway) lots. Meeting Notes: CiVE I� ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item - 5.A. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: Title of Item - Public Hearing for Delano Subdivision (H-2019-0027) by Boll Cook Investments, LLC, Located at 14120 W. Jasmine Ln. and 2800 E. Jasmine Ln. Click Here for Application Materials The link to sign in to testify along with instructions on how to join the virtual meeting will be available at 8 a.m. Wednesday,April 15, 2020. ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Upload Date Updated Staff Report Staff Report 4/8/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 217 of 265 Details and Signatures For Public Hearing Hearing Date: 4/16/2020 Hearing Type: PZ Item Number: 5-A Project Name: Delano Subdivision Project No.: H-2019-0027 Active: Signature HOA I Wish To Sign In Sign-In Email HOA Name For Neutral Against Name Represent Participate Date/Time 4/15/2020 Trairatnobhas Pointe Laura lauratrairatnobhas@hotmail.com Alpine X X 9:15:31 AM Malissa Alpine 4/15/2020 Bernard mmbernard1@msn.com Pointe X X X 9:29:20 HOA AM Michael 4/15/2020 mmbernard1@msn.com X X 9:30:19 Bernard AM Alpine 4/15/2020 Sandi King ssking72@live.com Pointe X X 10:26:25 Subdivision AM 4/16/2020 Kenneth J Alpine kenclifford@q.com X X 11:38:03 Clifford Pointe AM 4/16/2020 Ali Crane paulandali@gmail.com 7:28:55 PM Go Back To List Export To Excel ©2020 - City of Meridian, Idaho STAFF REPORT C�I w IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING April 16,2020 Legend DATE: Continued from:March 19, 2020 j���� Project Location tq hb TO: Planning&Zoning Commission FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner v 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton,Development ® € Services Manager 208-887-2211 - -- SUBJECT: H-2019-0027 �rt� 1 T 1 ®iL Delano Subdivision - LOCATION: 2800& 14120 W. Jasmine Ln. y History: This project was originally heard by the Commission on May 2, and July 18,2019; at the hearing on July 18t1i,the Commission voted to recommend denial of the project to City Council. The City Council heard the project on November 12,2019; at that hearing, Council voted to remand the project back to the Commission to address the density issue of the proposed development and for Commission's review of a revised plat with changes to lots proposed along the northern boundary of the subdivision that front on E. Della Street(e.g. single-story, detached units,lose a lot(s)). (See pg. 16 for more information) Update: The Applicant submitted revised plans for the Commission hearing based on discussion at the City Council hearing and meetings with the neighbors,included in Section VII. The revisions include a reduction in the number of buildable lots from 85 to 66; a change to the proposed zoning(the portion of the site along the north&west boundaries previously proposed to be zoned R-15 is now proposed to be zoned R-8); and a change to the conceptual building elevations. Staff has updated the subject staff report based on the revised plans—original text that is no longer applicable is shown in strike-out and new text is shown in underline format. The conditions of approval in Section VIII are not in strike-out/underline format as there were no conditions that went forward to Council because the Commission recommended denial of the project; new conditions are included in accord with the revised plans based on those originally recommended by Staff to the Commission for the May 2,2019 hearing. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Comprehensive Plan map atmeadmea4 to inelude 4.10 aer-es of 4ad ettffefAly in Boise's Area of City impaet and plaming area in Mer-idian's pla*ning area with a Mixed Use Regional Fulufe L—Andd T_�_Je Map desipation;Note: The Comprehensive Plan Map amendment application is no longer needed as Page 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 218 of 265 the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) was amended with the new Comprehenisve Plan to include an MU-R FL UM designation for this property. Annexation&zoning of 15.22 acres of land with R-8 (3.31 acres),R-15 (11.57 8.12 acres)and R-40 (3-.64 3.79 acres)zoning districts; and, Preliminary plat consisting of 85 66 single-family residential building lots, 1 building lot for a 96-unit multi-family development,and-12 88 common lots and 2 other(common driveway lots on 15.22 acres of land in the R-8,R-15 and R-40 zoning districts. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT 1. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 15.22 Future Land Use Designation MDR(Medium Density Residential)i City of Mer-i r & Mixed Use-Regional(MU-R)4n C4P of Be &e Existing Land Use 2 existing homes&accessory structures Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family residential(SFR),attached p• deta hed and conceptual multi-family residential(MFR) Current Zoning RUT in Ada County Proposed Zoning R-8,R-15 &R-40 Lots(#and type;bldg/common) 85 66 SFR building/128 common/1 MFR building and 2 other Phasing plan(#of phases) Yes;23 phases Number of Residential Units(type 444 66 SFR detached units"4 ,,ttaehe 67 deta he SF ,and of units) 96 MFR apartments) Density(gross&net) 7-.35 5_7(SFR,R-8&R-15)&27(MFR,R-40)gross units/acre; 11.8(SFR,v 1 c) u,27(MFR,n n m o«8.12 units/acre(SFR)(net) Open Space(acres,total[%]/ See Analysis, Section V.3 buffer/qualified) Amenities Shade s«...,,.ttwe (2)play structures,benches .wide. , walk-ways See Analysis, Section V.3 Physical Features(waterways, None hazards,flood plain,hillside) Neighborhood meeting date;#of February 25,2019;92 attendees attendees: Applicant met with the Alpine Pointe HOA Board on December 16'and 231,2019;the revised plan was presented to the HOA Board on February 18',2020-30+/-people attended(an official neighborhood meeting was not held as it wasn't required). History(previous approvals) None 2. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District Page 2 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 219 of 265 • Staff report No Yes (yes/no) • Requires ACHD Yes(tentatively sehed le,l.e,.e heard on May 22,2019) Commission This project is being heard by the ACHD Commission because of Action(yes/no) objections from neighbors pertaining to the extension of Dashwood Pl. and connectivity to Centrepointe Way Fire Service • Distance to Fire 1.-34 miles from Fire Station#3 (can meet the response time requirements) Station • Fire Response 3 minutes under ideal conditions Time • Resource 82%from Fire Station#3—does meet the target goal of 9580%or Reliability greater • Risk 2�1 (SFRfesidential)and 4(MFR)—current resources would not be Identification adequate to supply service to the proposed project;ksee comments in Section VIII.Q • Accessibility Meets requirements;FD is eaneemed s there is no visitor-par-king in the development r-estilting in peo„le par-Ling; areas that,v.nM ., e y eek Ies; es. See additional comments in Section VIII.C. • Special/resource Doesn't The MFR portion of the project will require an aerial device(see needs comments in Section VIII.C) • Water Supply Requires 1,000 gallons per minute for 1 hour(may be less if building is sprinklered) • Other Resources NA Police Service • Distance to 5 miles Police Station • Police Response 4:30 minutes Time • Calls for Service 0904 in RD `M724' • Accessibility PD has no issues with proposed access • Specialty/resourc No additional resources are needed;MPD already services this area. e needs • Crimes 0119 • Crashes 026 West Ada School District • Distance(elem, Discovery Elementary—2.83 miles;Heritage Middle School—3.46 miles; ms,hs) Rocky Mountain High School—5-756.2 miles • Capacity of Discovery Elementary 650;Heritage Middle School 1,000;Rocky Schools Mountain High School 1,800 • #of Students Discovery Elementary Jq5511;Heritage Middle School 1-,2-541, 446;Rocky Enrolled Mountain High School'-,4482, 669 • Anticipated 68 school aged children generated by this development Wastewater Page 3 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 220 of 265 • Distance to 0-feet _ Sewer Services • Sewer Shed Five Mile Trunkshed • Estimated 181 Project Sewer ERU's • WRRF 13.66 MGD Declining Balance • Project Yes Consistent with WW Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts& The following proposed manholes have less than 3'of cover:A-3,A-4,A- Concerns 5,C-1 and D-5.Public Works has previously discussed with the applicant the possibility of using grinder pumps in these shallow areas,but the plans do not note the use of them. If the parcel to the north of the multi-family is to be served by Meridian,applicant must stub sewer at minimum slope in N. Centrepointe Way to the north boundary line. Water • Distance to 0-feet Water Services • Pressure Zone 3 • Estimated See application information Project Water ERU's • Water Quality None • Project Yes Consistent with Water Master Plan • Impacts& Public Works has met with SUEZ Water and agreed that water service to Concerns the north for the multi-family portion of the development will be provided according to how annexation proceeds. Meridian will provide water in Meridian,and SUEZ will provide water in Boise. Page 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 221 of 265 I 1 •1. 1 1 ION 11■1111■1� -1 - .... C .1�■I Mid - - . - • -f ,1g .: .... ., •S • ■■1 '�•1111{l�111 IINIn I - • - • • • I -M•1a ■■1■1 11 i■1111- _•111111�:{I111111111 1 ' !!1!!! !!!{ 11�I I uuu1N 1111111111 - _ - ■ 1pl ill, uu unuuw/p�m - -.III■-■■ 9111111111111 • Z 9..��[[ � � ' �1MINNIEV S Rad ■., i■ z: ■ T 7■111r_ 1111111111: ill■lu}ui u _ lJq; ,C• ..7.-1 _III„- .�• I': E.::J � Ib_. R DII n1{11111q ' 1 ■■ - • - • D►un■■■■■ram � - • - • •rp unnm►� -} !1♦t1 ■Ii: 11■1■!1��n nl■■ �iR7C7�i Q� �� 1'_�iNl 1 r`�� �ih1`!Iu.� nuw-�nnuun �� iyi r�iu: �1n n■: a ru!� I�� Ir� I► ►•4uuu- umn:nnuun �� �ri i��i,Unm.1 •umu_� !{II!lurlll 11017��' � ; ti.±n1 ui� GuwaiLnuum �I��I r►+♦i Qpinuu 7I 'umu•: 1� , - 1IIIII ,, *a �I■ - .�:1; ■O■I� IIm11►\► ♦♦ \ �. ■ • 1111111�:--• ' • -• '• ♦ ci:c7���. IIIIIIIIII Illlu \�, ■ ■ills=_ ! ►�!7__ \�as■ ■ I,l�I■ II�IIuI::G ' ,��1+�����..-■ =un er r iumi::� � M�'a o:�rwu'r ' r .1.11111111■. � �=� � •d A r 1■■1■ ♦♦ ♦ . �•InIl111I, , \ aaa■�a■ Iinnn �� ,■�:.�=� :�1#,>.1!M 1111 1Miss :r..._elm • m �I�1�IJiw. ' �� _�■a :114�It�!'t ' ml�sm r �r vim►■...n :=i Ir�In�i it i�:- r:::.'�.� -- , r 7 t�Inn1n•-• :n �� Asl! I i■n■'�_.....►r{� ��.�� ■`I- j1�-■ ��III■a • W Iw i%Qs�pin uu��IIIIIIII��nr■uu�,.1�i=i' �� ::�_11{■�,.unu J� �/n {■■><���II�:■i�iiii:'nnll■uu:�i_i:��I I{1t• .-.� �■, r��u��r is. Inn► _� :: w {!l1��Q��■iiiiii:�,�anuwlry` W .N. {i11ii%iwi�►��r��:■III■ul•, _��_�■��:J�■�. �1�■!.■I1 -' IE111EI= :■11 \{ ����■1111/■:',�III �_■ '�,��� 111 1{ •�II��F■n ME., un .:r►boom_ i 101.r► ,.,••,.••,•�*�>t rWl■ E IIIIII II.....I......I.IpJ6J ......fl __ a IIIIII_II':11 ii liili iiiiii- �i11ifl � 1 1 , ■ , B. Owner: Norm Cook— 14120 W. Jasmine Ln.,Boise,ID 83713 Eddy Bollinger—2800 E.Jasmine Ln.,Meridian, ID 83646 C. Representative: ;yea Bair Devoe Developmend 1=C; 4824 E. Favie��e., Boise, 1P 83 Hethe Clark, Clark Wardle—251 E. Front St.,Boise,ID 83701 IV. NOTICING Planning&Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date 4/12/2019; 6/28/2019; Newspaper Notification 2/25/2020; 3/27/2020 Radius notification mailed to 4/9/2019; 6/25/2019; properties within 300 feet 2/25/2020; 3/27/2020 Public hearing notice sign posted 4/22/2019; 7/8/2019; 3/4/20; on site 4/4/20 Nextdoor posting 4/9/2019; 6/25/2019; 2/25/2020; 3/27/2020 V. STAFF ANALYSIS 1. f''l1T,PREiiE Since the hearing at City Council on November 12, 2019, the City adopted a new Comprehensive Plan, which included an amendment to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM that assigned an MU- R designation to the majority of the property that lies east of Centrepointee Way. Therefore, the application for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is no longer required; Staffhas deleted this section from the report. 2. ANNEXATION&ZONING The applicant requests annexation and zoning of the 11.5 7 11.43 acres west of N. Centrepointe Way with an the R-8 (3.31 acres) and R-15 (11.57 8.12 acres)zoning districts; and the 5 acres east of N. Centrepointe Way with an R-40 zoning district(3-.64 3.79 acres)consistent with the MDR and proposed MU-R FLUM designations.Note: There is a small portion of the Cook parcel(east side of Centrepointe Wax) that on the FL UM does not have a designation. This was a mapping error and the entire Cook parcel is effectively designated MU-R. Comprehensive Plan(https:llwww.meridianciiy.or /�compplan): The Future Land Use Map(FLUM)designation for the portion of this site west of the extension of N. Centrepointe Way is Medium Density Residential(MDR)it the City f Mar-id ;the portion of the site east of the extension of N. Centrepointe Way is 1y was previously located in the City of Boise's Area of City Impactboundary and iswas designated General Mixed Page 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020- Page 223 of 265 Use. On October 29,2019,the Boise City Council approved and adopted the resolution(RES- 521-19)to amend the land use map of Blueprint Boise to transfer this area from the City of Boise Area of City Impact(AOCI)to the City of Meridian AOCI. The recent amendment to the City of Meridian's FLUM included this property with a Mixed-RegionalMU-R)future land use designation.As noted in the previous eeti n the n....i:eant proposes t amend the F UM designation. The MDR designation allows smaller lots for residential purposes within City limits.Uses may include single-family homes at gross densities of 3 to 8 units per acre. The MU-R designation allows high density multi-family developments as supporting uses for higher intense commercial uses such as those to the south and east of this site along a major transportation corridor(i.e. Eagle Rd./SH-55)and near arterial intersections (i.e. McMillan/Eagle Rds. &Ustick/Eagle Rds.). Land Use: The proposed land use for this site is single-family residential (SFR)and a future multi-family residential(MFR)development(i.e. apartments). A total of 5566 (19 attae e a-E 67 detached) SFR units at a gross density of 7-465_7 units per acre, and a net density of 44-8 8.12 units per acre are proposed; and 96 apartment units are planned to develop in the future at a gross and net density of 27 units per acre. The proposed density is consistent with that desired in the MDR and MU-R designations respectively. Proposed Use Analysis: The proposed single-family dwellings(a**a�detached)are listed as a principal permitted use in the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts; and the multi-family development is listed as a conditional use in the R-40 zoning district per UDC Table 11-2A-2. Multi-family developments are subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27; compliance with these standards will be evaluated in the future through the conditional use permit process. Concept Plan: The Applicant submitted a concept development plan for the property to the north(Parcel# R4582530100) at Staff s request to demonstrate how the property could possibly redevelop with the extension of N. Centrepointe Way to the north as planned on the MSM(see Section VII.E). Transportation: The Master Street Map(MSM) depicts a planned north/south commercial collector street through this site from the south boundary to the north boundary eventually connecting to E. Wainwright Dr. for access via N. Eagle Rd./SH-55. The portion of Centrepointe W4Y proposed to be constructed with this development is consistent with the MSM. Comprehensive Plan Policies(https:llwww.meridiancity.or /g compplan): Goals,Objectives, &Action Items: Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this application and apply to the proposed use of this property(staff analysis in italics): • "Provide for a wide diversity of housing types(single-family, modular,mobile homes and multi-family arrangements)and choices between ownership and rental dwelling units for all income groups in a variety of locations suitable for residential development." (3.07.03B) A mix of SFR a;*��detached homes and MFR apartment units are proposed within this development which will provide ownership and rental options for various income groups in this area. Page 7 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 224 of 265 • "Provide housing options close to employment and shopping centers."(3.07.02D) The proposed development will provide housing options in close proximity to the employment and shopping center uses along the Eagle Rd. corridor. • "Locate high-density development,where possible,near open space corridors or other permanent major open space and park facilities,Old Town, and near major access thoroughfares."(3.07.02L) The density proposed in the multi family portion of the development falls within the high density category. The site is located wiMin approximate lX a mile of rom Kleiner Memorial Park, a 60-acre City Park, and is in close proximity to N. Eagle Rd./SH-55, a major access thoroughfare. • "Consider ACHD's Master Street Map(MSM)in all land use decisions."(3.03.04K) The MSM depicts a north/south collector street through this site; the proposed plan depicts a collector street in accord with the MSM. • "Require open space areas within all development."(6.01.01A) Qualified open space in accord with the minimum standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3 is required. • "Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is contiguous to the City."(3.01.01F) The proposed development is contiguous to the City and urban services can be provided to this development. • "Restrict private curb cuts and access points on collectors and arterial streets."(3.06.02D) One(1) access is proposed on the west side off. Centrepointe Way, a collector street, to the SFR portion of the development; and one (1) access is proposed on the east side off. Centrepointe Way for the MFR portion of the development. Sta,ff recommends local street access (or a driveway with a cross-access easement) is provided to the propertX (#R4582530202) abutting the R-40 zoned portion of the site as set forth in UDC 11-3A-3A.3, as the property currently only has access via Eagle Rd./SH--55. • "Coordinate with transportation agencies to ensure provision of services and transit development." (6.02.02H) This site is not currently served by public transportation. However, ValleyConnect 2.0 proposes bus service on Eagle Rd.from the Boise Research Center to downtown Kuna with 20 minute frequencies in the peak hour. The Closest bus stop would be less than %mile from this site when that route is operational. • "Require pedestrian access connectors in all new development to link subdivisions together to promote neighborhood connectivity as part of a community pathway system."(3.03.0313) There are no pathway connections to this development from adjacent developments to the north and south other than sidewalks adjacent to public streets. Staff recommends the Applicant coordinate with the Developer of the property to the south (Brickyard Apartments)to incorporate pedestrian connections between the two developments i.e. the single-family and the mulit-family developments) on each side of N. Centrepointe Way. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in all Mixed Use areas,per the Comprehensive Plan (pgs.23-24): (Staffs analysis in italics) • "Residential densities should be a minimum of six dwellings/acre." The gross density of the proposed MFR development is 27 units per acre which falls within the range desired in mixed use designated areas. Page 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 225 of 265 • "Where feasible,higher density and/or multi-family residential development will be encouraged, especially for projects with the potential to serve as employment destination centers and when the project is adjacent to US 20/26, SH-55, SH-16 or SH-69." The proposed development incorporates a MFR component along with the SFR development and is in close proximity (i.e. 460) to N. Eagle Rd./SH--55. The proposed development will provide housing options for nearby employment centers. • "A conceptual site plan for the entire mixed-use area should be included in the application." A concept plan was included on the landscape plan for the future MFR development in conjunction with the SFR development currently proposed. • "In developments where multiple commercial and/or office buildings are proposed(not residential),the buildings should be arranged to create some form of common,usable area, such as a plaza or green space." This development does not include commercial/office buildings. • "The site plan should depict a transitional use and/or landscaped buffering between commercial and existing low-or medium-density residential development." The proposed single-family armed an detached units with var;ying lot sizes and setbacks will provide a transition in density and lot sizes between larger single-family residential lots to the north and the townhomes/multi family lots to the south. This development does not include any commercial uses; however, the proposed multi family development on the eastern portion of the site will provide a transition between the proposed single-family attached and detached units and future commercial/mixed uses along Eagle Rd. • "A mixed-use project should include at least three types of land uses [i.e. commercial (includes retail,restaurants, etc.), office,residential, civic (includes public open space,parks, entertainment venues, etc.), and industrial]. Exceptions may be granted for smaller sites on a case-by-case basis." The proposed development plan only includes one land use type (i.e. residential); however, lrreetwo different types of residential units are proposed(i.e. single-family detached, nand multi family apartment units). Within the overall mixed use designated area, which incorporates land on both sides of Eagle Rd./SH55 to the south to Fairview Ave., there are a mix of uses as desired consisting of commercial(retail, restaurants, etc.), office and residential uses. • "Community-serving facilities such as hospitals,churches, schools,parks, daycares, civic buildings, or public safety facilities are expected in larger mixed-use developments." This is a relatively small portion of the overall mixed use designated area; none of these types of uses are proposed on this site nor have they been developed on the adjacent mixed use designated area to the south. • "Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks,plazas, outdoor gathering areas,open space, libraries,and schools are expected; outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count." The proposed plan does not incorporate public and/or quasi public spaces and places; the common area proposed in the residential development is owned by the Homeowner's Association and does not satisfy this requirement. These types of public spaces have been provided in the adjacent mixed use designated area to the south. • "All mixed-use projects should be directly accessible to neighborhoods within the section by both vehicles and pedestrians." Page 9 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 226 of 265 The proposed development plan shows interconnectivity with the residential neighborhood to the north providing accessibility to the commercial development to the south via N. Centrepointe Way. • "Street sections consistent with the Ada County Highway District Master Street Map are required within the Unified Development Code." The proposed development plan includes a north/south collector street(i.e. N. Centrepointe Way) consistent with the Master Street Map. • "Because of the existing small lots within Old Town, development is not subject to the Mixed-Use standards listed herein." The proposed development is not within Old Town; therefore, this provision is not applicable. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in MU-R areas,per the Comprehensive Plan(pg.30): • "Development should comply with the general guidelines for development in all Mixed-Use areas." See analysis above. • "Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 10%of the development area at densities ranging from 6 to 40 units/acre." The proposed residential uses comprise 100%of the site. Densities of the SFR and MFR developments are in accord with this guideline. • "Retail commercial uses should comprise a maximum of 50%of the development area." No retail commercial uses are proposed with this development; however, the MU-R designated land to the south incorporates a large amount of retail commercial uses. • "There is neither a minimum nor a maximum imposed on non-retail commercial uses such as office, clean industry, or entertainment uses." No commercial uses are proposed with this development. Zoning: Based on the analysis above, Staff is of the opinion the requested annexation with the R-8,R-15 and R-40 zoning districts and proposed development is generally consistent with the MDR and prepesed-MU-R FLUM designations and is appropriate for this site. The proposed annexation area is contiguous to City annexed property to the north and south;the R-8 and R-15 area is within the Area of City Impact Boundary(AOCI)and the R-40 area is outside of the AOCI boundary. A legal description for the annexation area is included in Section VII.A. The City may require a development agreement(DA)in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. In order to ensure the site develops as proposed with this application, staff recommends a DA as a provision of annexation with the provisions included in Section VIII. 3. PRELIMINARY PLAT Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There are two(2)existing homes and accessory structures on this site. These structures are required to be removed prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer for the phase in which they are located. Page 10 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 227 of 265 Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The proposed plat and subsequent development is required to comply with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-6 for the R-8, 11-2A-7 for the R-15 and 11- 2A-8 for the R-40 zoning districts (so ). The proposed plat complies with these standards. Subdivision Design&Improvement Standards(UDC 11-6C-3): The proposed subdivision is required to be designed and improved per the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3 which include but are not limited to streets,driveways,common driveways, easements,and block face. The proposed plan complies with these standards. Phasing Plan: The subdivision is proposed to develop in 23 phases as shown on the phasing plan in Section VIILC. The first phase will include the extension of N. Dashwood Pl. from the north through the site to N. Centrepointe Way. Staff recommends the phasing plan is revised to include construction of the street buffer on the east side of N. Centrepointe Way in the first phase so that the street buffer and detached sidewalk is constructed and the buffer landscaped with the first phase of development. Access(UDC 11-3A-3,11-3H- /Streets: Jasmine Lane, a 50-foot wide private street,currently provides access to the lots in Jasmine Acres Subdivision,including the subject properties.The private street is depicted on the Jasmine Acres subdivision plat. Staff is unaware if a separate recorded easement exists for the private street.Where the easement crosses the subject property it should be relinquished; proof of relinquishment shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat. One access is proposed on either side of N. Centrepointe Way, a collector street; and an emergency only/pedestrian access is proposed from the extension of N. Dashwood Pl. at the north boundary of the site.A stub street(E. Jasmine St.)is proposed to the parcel to the west for access and future extension. Public streets are proposed within the SFR portion of the development with 27-foot wide street sections; private drive aisles will be provided within the MFR portion of the development. In accord with UDC 11-3A-3,which limits access points to collector streets to improve safety and requires access to be taken from a local street if available,Staff recommends N.Dashwood Pl.is extended as a full access street into the site with the first phase of development.Note:ACHD approved the connection of Dashwood Ave. to the existing stub street to the north (Dashwood Pl.) as a temporary emergency access/pedestrian connection until Centrepointe Way is extended to Wainwright Dr., or within 10 years, whichever occurs first. When Centrepointe Way is extended to Wainwright Dr., Dashwood Pl. will be reconstructed as a public street for vehicular connectivitv to Wainwri hg t Dr. UDC 11-3A-3A.3 requires all subdivisions to provide local street access to any use that currently takes direct access from an arterial or collector street.The parcel to the east of the property proposed to be zoned R-40 on the east side of Centrepointe Way(Parcel #R4582530202),currently takes direct access via N.Eagle Rd./SH-69, an arterial street and a State Highway; therefore, Staff recommends local street access(or a driveway with a cross-access easement)is provided to the property to the east as set forth in UDC 11-3A- 3A.3. The Applicant should coordinate with the developer of that property on a location for the access street/driveway. Staff recommends N. Centrepointe Way is extended/constructed with the first phase of development from the southern to the northern boundary of the site so that if re- development of the property to the north Won occurs before the multi-family portion of Page 11 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 228 of 265 this site,the connection to Wainwright Dr. can be made and services can be extended-as -H • Traffic: A Traffic Impact Study was not required by ACHD for the proposed development; however,the Applicant did include an informal traffic analysis in their application narrative based on ACHD's Policy Manual that takes into consideration existing traffic volumes in relation to anticipated traffic volumes from the proposed development and the resulting impacts to Wainwright Dr. &Dashwood Pl. The analysis shows the total trips per day on Wainwright at 41%of total capacity; and on Dashwood at 44% of total capacity resulting in 56-59%under total capacity for these streets,which should not overburden existing roadways systems if these calculations are correct. See application narrative for more information. Many letters of testimony have been received from adjacent residential property owners to the north regarding the amount of traffic that will be generated from the proposed development and routed through their neighborhood.For this reason,it's imperative that the Centrepointe Way connection to Wainwright occur as soon as possible; thus,the reason for Staffs recommendation for the pr-opeFty to the noFth to be ineluded in the amendm to the Fr UM and for the construction of Centrepointe to the northern boundary of the annexation area to occur with the first phase of development. Common Driveways (UDC 11-6C-3 All common driveways are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. TlweeTwo(32)common driveways are proposed that comply with UDC standards. Common driveways should be a maximum of 150' in length or less,unless otherwise approved by the Fire Dept. An exhibit is required to be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks,fencing,building envelope and orientation of the lots and structures.Driveways for abutting properties that aren't taking access from the common driveway(s) should be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line away from the common driveway. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited unless separated by a minimum 5-foot wide landscaped buffer. A perpetual ingress/egress easement for the common driveway(s)is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment.A copy of the easement should be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat. Signage should be provided at the ends of the common driveways on Lot 435,Block l et 7,� and Lot-19,Block 34 for emergency wayfinding purposes as requested by the Fire Department. Transition: There are 68 single-story structures with 10 8 dwelling„rits4ffopeft es proposed along the west boundary of this site adjacent to the 8.2 acre rural residential property to the west, which is currently in Ada County and designated as MDR(3-8 units/acre) on the FLUM. There are-5-.5 6 existing single-story residential properties to the north that abut this site that are 0.31-0.38 of an acre in size;4-012 single-family structures 15 12 a.,.o'�:r.„flits/ .,.,....el4ies are proposed along the north boundary of the site. n a4ive of the appliea4iea tha4 demeastmtes the proposed stmetwes and lots in relation to existing home shops par-king areas and• ards. See aerial map below. Because the homes proposed along the north and west boundaries will all be a single-story in height, Staff believes they will have a lesser impact on adjacent neighbors than 2-story homes would have; therefore,Staff is not recommending a greater transition in lot sizes Page 12 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 229 of 265 isthan proposed.However,the Commission and City Council should consider any public testimony provided in determining if fewer lots/structures should be provided along these boundaries as a better transition to existing residential properties. I � r r { II thmoo Parking(UDC 11-3C): Parking for single-family dwellings is required based on the number of bedrooms per unit.For 1- bedroom units, a minimum of 2 spaces per unit are required with at least one of those spaces in an enclosed garage, other space may be enclosed or a minimum 10' x 20' parking pad. For 2-3 bedroom units, a minimum of 4 spaces per unit are required with at least 2 of those spaces in an enclosed garage, other spaces may be enclosed or a minimum 10' x 20' parking pads. Because of the proposed reduced 27-foot wide street sections,parking is restricted to one side of the street only resulting in fewer available on-street parking spaces for guests and households with cars that can't be parked on private property than is typical with a full street section which allows parkins;on both sides of the street. Off-street parkin is s required to be provided on each lot in accord with the aforementioned UDC standards. Beeause of the w lots ( ftent of these lots for-guest pafk4ag a-ad in some afeas par-king is a ways away. Wher-e at4aeh heraes are proposed,there is r-oofn for-appr-eximately one spaee per-every 2 lots for-On Stfee On-street parking(5058 spaces)is also available adjacent to common lots and along one side of the street within 200' f e any home• ,ithi the deve opme-a+(see Exhibit H in Section VII). Pathways(UDC 11-3A-8): Pathways are required to be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8 with landscaping on either side of the pathway(s)in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B- 12C. Page 13 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 230 of 265 Reeause inter-eonneetiAty is important and espeeialty so in mixed use developments, Staff reeommends the Appl,'eant a ...-.linate with the Developer..E the property to the south (Brickyard Apartments)to iHeffpffate pedeStFifift conneetions between the developments on eaeh side of N. Centr-epointe 3AIW. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-17): Sidewalks are required to be constructed adjacent to public streets as set forth in UDC 11-3A-17. Minimum 5-foot wide detached sidewalks are required along all collector and after-ial streets; and minimum 5-foot wide attached(or detached) sidewalks are required along local streets as proposed. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-17): Parkways are required to be constructed and landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3A- 17E. Eight-foot wide parkways are proposed along the collector streets and along internal local street abutting common areas in accord with UDC standards. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): Per UDC Tables 11-2A-7 and 11-2A-8, a 20-foot wide buffer is required adjacent to N. Centrepointe Way, a collector street. Street buffer landscaping is required to be provided within common lots in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C; trees and shrubs should be depicted within the street buffers on either side of N. Centrepointee Way in accord with these standards. The Landscape Calculations table should include the linear feet of street buffers and the required vs.proposed number of trees demonstrating compliance with the aforementioned standard. Landscapin is s required to be provided in common open space areas in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-G-3E;the proposed landscaping exceeds the minimum standards. Landscaping is required within parkways as set forth in UDC 11-3A-17E and 11-3B-7C; the Landscape Calculations table should include the linear feet of parkways and the required vs.proposed number of trees demonstrating compliance with the aforementioned standard. Qualified Open Space(UDC 11-3G): Based on the overall development area which consists of 15.21 acres of land, a minimum of 10% (1.52 acres)qualified open space is required to be provided within the development per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B. Because the site is bisected by a collector street and the portion of the site proposed to develop with apartments is not beingdped at this time, Staff recommends the 10%open space is provided on each property; the R-8 and R-15 propertX totaling 11.3+/-acres should provide a minimum of 1.13 acres and the R-40 property totaling 3.6+/-acres should provide a minimum of 0.36 of an acre(in addition to the open space required in UDC 11-4-3-27C for multi-family developments). A revised qualified open space exhibit was submitted as shown in Section VII.F that depicts 4431.23 acres(or 44.510.8%)of open space for the SFR portion of the development consisting of a 10.69 of an acre park with amenities,parkways, , and linear open space that is at least 20' wide and has an access at each end and is landscaped, and a collector street buffer and a leea stf-eet buffer. The linear open space on Lot 17,Block 4 doesn't qualify as it's not accessible at the west end as required by UDC 11-3G-3B.1e,however the rest of the area meets the minimum standard at 1.17 acres. stFeeVland use buffer-along the southem boundary of the site toward the qua4ified open spa eats(see Seeti.n^ below for-more infamiationy The open space on the R-40 property will be evaluated for compliance with UDC 11-3G-3B at the time of submittal of a conditional use permit. Page 14 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 231 of 265 are that does not qualify(i.e. the perimeter-' — I g1he east boundary)and is below the 0 develop at this time and is eeneeptttal in aatidr-e and likely to ehange, Stag r-eeefflffleads a DA requir-ed of the total land area(i.e. 5 acres). Because that portion of the site is not planned to qualified open spaee is provided a4 the time of development th-at m-ee-eets the standards in UDC 11 3G 3B. This reqttiremen4 is in addition to that ieqir-e�' i rc�xr vDG 11 4-3 27C�vr-MF-Rueye efAs-. Qualified Site Amenities (UDC 11-3G): A minimum of one(1)qualified site amenity is required to be provided for this development based on the size of the overall development(i.e. 15.21 acres). The Applicant proposes a shade structure, children's play structure, children's climbing dome, children's climbing boulders, seating benches,public art and a pathway as amenities,which exceed UDC standards. The pathway does not count as a qualified amenity as it doesn't meet the standards in UDC 11-3G-3C.3; however,the other amenities proposed do qualify and exceed the minimum standards. Existing Trees: There are many existing trees on this site the Applicant states are being removed by the residential property owner for firewood. Include mitigation information on the plan for any existing trees that are not removed by the property owner in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-10C.5. Waterways(UDC 11-3A-6): The Nourse Lateral runs along the northern boundary of this site and is piped. An easement should be depicted on the plat for the waterway.If the easement is 10 feet or greater,it should be located within a common lot that is a minimum 20-feet wide and outside of a fenced area unless modified by City Council as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6D. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing constructed on the site is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A- 7. The existing fencing along the north and southwest boundaries of the site is proposed to remain. A 6-foot tall solid vinyl privacy fence is proposed along the west, south and east boundaries of the SFR portion of the site as well as along the nofth, oast and south boundaries of the N4F p^.tion of th ^ t^ in accord with UDC standards. A 4-foot tall wrought iron fence is proposed around the perimeter of the children's play area on Lot 1,Block-32. Utilities(UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is proposed. Street lighting is required to be installed in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. See Section VIII.B below for Public Works comments/conditions. Pressurized Irrigation System(UDC 11-3A-IS): An underground pressurized irrigation system is required to be provided for each lot within the development. Page 15 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 232 of 265 Storm Drainage(UDC 11-3A-18 : An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed single-family a**a�. detached units and multi-family apartment structures as shown in Section VII.F. Building materials for the single-family homes consist of a mix of siding(horizontal and vertical lap siding and board&batten) and stucco with stone veneer accents. The multi-family structures are required to comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual; single-family detached structures are exempt from this requirement. All SFR homes along the west and north perimeter boundaries of the development will be restricted to a single-story in height as proposed b, t�pplicant. Because the rear and/or side of 2-story structures on Lots 14-1812-8,Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 25 that face N. Centrepointe Way will be highly visible, Staff recommends those elevations incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses,step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches, balconies,material types,or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines.Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. Public Testimony:Many letters of testimony have been received on the original plan submitted with this application,primarily from residential neighbors to the north in Alpine Pointe Subdivision(aka Zebulon Heights). The primary concerns are the intensity of the development (i.e. density is too high); not enough transition in lot sizes to lower larger lots to the north; extension of N. Dashwood Pl. and Centrepointe Way and resulting traffic generated from this development and from the developments to the south that will be routed through their subdivision until Centrepointe can be extended to the north to Wainwright in a more direct fashion; and safety concerns for children pertaining to traffic. The neighbors have suggested several alternate development plans that would result in less traffic through their neighborhood. See public testimony in the project file for more information. Additional public testimony has been received on the revised plan that can be accessed at: httgs://weblink.meridianciby.org/WebLink/browse.aspx?id=166928&&dbid=0&&repo=Meridian C 4. A T TTDAT A TT;1T C-OmFi i A NC-E A local street buffer is no longer proposed; Staff has removed this section as it is no longer applicable. spaee for-the development. The"alified open spaee peFtaining to street bugar-s listed in UPC= 11 36 3B allOws the full are 5B 5,to be allowed to eeui4 the area of a leeal stT-eet buffer-toward the minifi+RM EtUalified Opffi of the SFR peAien of the site with dense landseaping along E.jasimine ., > to btf Page 16 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 233 of 265 alter-native provides an equal or superior-means of meeting the intent and purpose of the regulation(see T7;,,,]ings i Seet .,,-. IX ill inteaded pufpese of UDC-1-13G-3 has beenfnet. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed!''l,.v...rehe..siye Plan",rap Amendment if- t e par-eel to the aei4h(R4592530100) is also ineloded,the Annexation&Zoning and Preliminary Plat applications with the conditions included in Section VIII.A per the Findings in Section IX. if the par-eel to the aeAh(R4592530100) is not ineltided in the map amendment, Staff reconunends denial of annexation and zoning reqaest for the eastern par-eel(i.e. R 4 0 zone). B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on May 2 and July 18, 2019. At the public hearingon n July 18t'',the Commission moved to recommend denial of the subject CPAM, AZ and PP requests to City Council. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing: a. In favor: Jim Conger; b. In opposition: Malissa Bernard(representing many neighbors on Dashwood Place to the north in Alpoint Point Sub.);Frank Marcos(Alpine Point Sub. HOA President); Kenneth Clifford; Sherry Garey; Greg Walker;Patricia Pitzer; Joy Cameron; Sandi King; Laura Trairatnobhas c. Commenting: Connie Thompson; d. Written testimony: Many(47+/-)letters of testimony were received(see public record). e. Staff presenting application: Bill Parsons f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Ke. ids)of public testimony a. Consensus that proposed density of development is too high; b. Not enough transition in lot sizes is proposed to larger lots to the north; c. Concern pertaining to the extension of Dashwood Pl. and Centrepointe Way and resulting traffic generated from the proposed development and from the commercial and multi-family residential developments to the south that will be routed through the subdivision to the north if Jasmine is connected to Centrepointe before Centrepointe can be extended to the north to Wainwright; d. Safety concerns for children pertaining to traffic; e. The proposed development is premature and that infrastructure (i.e. the extension of Centrepointe to Wainwright) should be in place prior to the development going i after the fact; f. There has been no negotiation with neighbors by the Developer as directed by the Commission; 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. The desire for the City of Boise to take action on a request to exclude the eastern portion of the site from their Area of City Impact boundga prior to the City making a decision on this application; b. The possibili , of only an emergency access via Dashwood Pl.; Page 17 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 234 of 265 C. Concern pertainingtquacy of parking for the development; d. Preference for R-8 vs. R-15 zoning for the single-family portion and R-15 vs. R-40 zoning for the multi-family portion of the site as a transition to adjacent zoning; e. Density should be reduced due to Heritage Middle School and Rock Mountain High School already being over capacity f. Desire for the Applicant to work with neighbors to address issues that were brought up at the hearjn& 4. Commission change, (s)to Staff recommendation: a. The Commission recommended denial of the proposed CPAM,AZ and PP applications to the City Council based on their desire for the Applicant to obtain approval from the City of Boise for the adjustment to the Area of City Impact boundary; and opinion the applicant did not sufficiently work with the neighbors on their concerns pertaining to the proposed development. 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. None C. City Council: The City Council heard this project on November 12,2019 and moved to remand the project back to the Commission to address the density issue of the proposed development and for their review of a revised site plan with changes to lots proposed along the northern boundary of the subdivision that front on E.Della Street. VII, EXHIBITS A. Removed as an amendment to the FL UM is no longer necessary. Page 18 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 235 of 265 B. Annexation&Zoning Legal Description and Exhibit Map REVISED Sawtooth Land Surveying, LLC A2'%' kk- P030 5. W.Ashmc3ton Ave. I=mmett, 11) 63617 rI f C r T f r: ;208) 39a-a 104 r: (2oe) 3q6-6,o5 Delano Zoning R-8 Description BASIS OF BEARING for this description is South 89°39'12"West, between the illegible brass cap marking the E1/4 Corner of Section 32 and the 518"rebar PLS 4431 marking the C1/4 Corner of Section 32, both in T.4 N., R. i E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. A parcel of land being a portion of Lot 3, Block 1 of Jasmine Acres, as shown in Book 59 of Plats, at Page 5829,Ada County Records, and a portion of the 5E1/4 of Section 32, T. 4 N., R. 1 E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the illegible brass cap marking the E1/4 Corner of said Section 32; Thence South 89039'12"West, Coincident with the north line of said 5F1/4 of Section 32, a distance of 1026.20 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1 of said Jasmine Acres and the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence South 0°20'48"East, coincident with the west line of said Lot 1, a distance of 125.59 feet; Thence South 89"42'00"West, parallel with the south line of said Lot 3, a distance of 121.45 feet; Thence South 49130'18"West, 20.50 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left; Thence 43.46 feet along the arc of said curve,with a radius of 50,00 feet, a central angle of 49148'18", subtended by a chord bearing North 6512351"West, 42.11 feet; Thence South 891142'00"West, parallel with said south line of Lot 3, a distance of 382.00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the left; Thence 78.54 feet along the arc of said curve,with a radius of 50,00 feet, a central angle of 90100'00", subtended by a chord bearing South 44°42'00"West, 70.71 feet; Thence South 00°18'00"East, 372.09 feet; Thence South 89142'00"West, parallel with said south line of Lot 3, a distance of 109.27 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the right; Thence 14,35 feet along the arc of said curve, with a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 16,12624", subtended by a chord bearing North 82104'48"West, 14.30 feet; Thence North 73151'36"West, 18,22 feet to the westerly line of said Lot 3; Thence North 16108'24"East, coincident with the common line of said Lots 3 and 4, Black 1, Jasmine Acres, 25.45 feet to the northernmost common corner of said Lots 3 and 4; P:12018118094-DELANO SUBDIVISION-CMGISurveylDrawingsloescriptions418094 zoning r-8 desc.docx I1 Page 19 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 236 of 265 Thence North 1010'44"East,coincident with the east boundary line of said Lot 4, a distance of 511.15 to the northeast corner of said Lot 4, which is an said north line of the 5E114; Thence North 891139'12"East, coincident with said north line of the 5E1f4, a distance of 727,70 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described parcel contains 3.31 acres, more or less. 11574 �Ie OF EAG�- RQ018118094-DELANO SUBDIVISION-CMGlSurvey%Drawing$%Descriptions118094 zoning r-8 desc.docx IZ Page 20 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 237 of 265 MUS OF BEARAG N 8'39'u'E 7,7-70' POW OF BEGWNG 5Sg-"17'W — — ^ — 1026.20, WC32 SEC 32 5903-04' ZLWWNG R-8 12557 E 114 CORNEA C 1f4 CORMS a 13I AC3 500°2046'E "1 1 CV I iOTL HLOOC i 14—qgiNEACRE5 x �+ LINE TAKE m LOT 4,Njxx1 mr s -- 1 LS N i6'Q8'24'E 2i4' ICll VE TAME e LLRVE ARC LOQGTH RAMS OELTAAN � 1 4346 4 z3 i- 42.11' 549'u2w 9 � �a LOT 3,aiocxt u Lnr4BLOMI FAaGfEVEIN —— — .SE QO 32ER 5L u IV7 q r,► pRaX:Cf• O WNERIVEVaGPER: DV k 5 7 BOLL COOK za3n s, WA 71T, D R3617 Ave. G 18094-EX DEiANO ZONING!?� INVESTMENTS,LLC p 1(208)390 8104 PRWEL70 4T� BOUNDARY Of,��� T.4 N. R.I E. 8.10., `5 JWT T- R(208)398-8105 18094 HE ADA COUNTY,II)AHD hare: L�� 1 SHEET �! �7LLG WWW.S4WTOOTHL-,COM I OFI Page 21 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 238 of 265 5awtooth Land 5urveylncj, LLC " 2430 5-wa5mngton Ave, 1 044 Northwest DIvj_,Ste-G 141 1"Avcnue[a5t Emmett,IV 836 17 Coeur d'Atcne,ID 8381 4 Jerome,1053335 J I P= (206)355.al04 P:(206)714-4544 P; (208)329.5303 r=(208)395-$r05 f.(206)292-4453 P:(20$)324-3a21 R-15 Re-Zone Description BASIS OF BEARING for this description is South 89"39'12"West,from the illegible brass tap marking the E1/4 Corner of Section 32 and the 5/8"rebar PLS 4431 marking the C1/4 Corner of Section 32, both in T.4 N., R. 1 E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. A parcel of land being a portion of Lot 3, Block 1 of 3asmine Acres, as shown in Book 59 of Plats, at Page 5829, Ada County Records,and a portion of the N1/2 of the 5112 of Section 32, T.4 N., R. 1 E., B.M.,Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the illegible brass cap marking the E1f4 Corner of said Section 32; Thence South 89"39'12"West, coincident with the center of Section line of said Section 32, a distance of 1026.20 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1 of said Jasmine Acres; Thence South 0"2048"East, coincident with the west boundary line of said Lot 1, a distance of 125.59 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing South 0°20'48"East, coincident with the west boundary line of said Lot 1, a distance of 221.24 feet to the northwest corner cf said Lot 3; North 89"42'00"East, coincident with the north boundary line of said Lot 3, a distance of 43.10 feet; Thence South 0018'UO"East, 316.85 feet to the south boundary line of said Lot 3, Thence South 89"42'00"West, coincident with the south boundary line of said Lot 3, a distance of 684.43 feet; Thence North 481111'00"West, coincident with the south boundary line of said Lot 3, a distance of 154.02 feet to the southernmost common corner of Lots 3 and 4 of said Jasmine Acres; Thence North 16"08'24"East, coincident with the common boundary line of Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Jasmine Acres, 25.45 feet; Thence South 73°51'36"East, 18.21 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the left; Thence 14.35 feet along the arc of said curve, with a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 1611126'24", subtended by a chord bearing South 82"04'48"East, 14.30 feet; Thence North 89042'00"East, parallel with said south boundary line, 109.27 feet; Thence North 01118'00"west, 372.09 feet to the beginning of a tangent cure to the right; P:12018110094-DELANO SUBDIVISION-CMGISurveylDrawingslDescripticns118094 R-15 RE-ZONE DESCRIPTION.docx - 11 Page 22 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 239 of 265 Thence 78.54 feet along the arc of said curve, with a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 90000"00", subtended by a chard bearing North 441142'00"East, 70.71 feet; Thence North 89142'00"East, parallel with said south boundary line, 382,00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the right; Thence 43.46 feet along the arc of said curve, with a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 49148'18", subtended by a chord bearing South 65023'51"East, 42.11 feet; Thence North 49030'18"East, 20,50 feet; Thence North 89°42'00" East, parallel with said south boundary line, 121.45 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described parcel contains 8.12 acres, more or less, ND CGS Q � 11574 SEA :1-M18118094-❑ELAND SUBDIVISION-CMGISurveylDrawingslDescripti❑ns118094 R-15 RE-ZONE 7ESCRIPTION.docx 12 Page 23 — - Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 240 of 265 MWIF BEARM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - s 83.3VI2'w 2OX94.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NBD"MWE 72770' _ 5fi9mJYt'w SEC 32 903.PF' J 101G20' f JA cawa 889°47="E-Won, w o 15 POINT OF WlGL IIHG !DT l�BLOCK 1 em, w -AWNS AME9 a � R-15L, &12 ACC IA LOT 31 ILOGCS ! 1�5 t L f { lOT$BOCK 1 E lA'.AIfHE 1H } 599°4280"W m69L4 gg7aFRR SEC 32 LWE TAW.E NT5 o cuavE TnBE Lu Nays a cva A 5EAR➢ffi O*)RD LENi:FN I 'E 25.I5, 9 50.IXI' I6°Zfi'2k fa L3 5 °]' "E i. Q ,5q N49 -E Hdl 4 E 189 f.f6' ia.08' f 1 1 W a7.it LS II 4- 1 /1 E 121. PROJECT.' OWNEWDEVELOPER: DWG# 2030 S. WASNINGTCITV AVF. aELANO ZONING f2-}5 BOLL COOK EMMETT,ID 83617 18a94-IX INVESTMENTS.LLC P:(208 398-9104 PRO BOUNDARY )eCrA F.-(208j 398-810518094 T.4 N.,R. i 0�l` SHEff AL?A COUNTY,,IAAHANO �-V Hare: 312020 �^x1 7 r WWW.SAWTOOTHL5.COM 10F1 Page 24 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020- Page 241 of 265 Sawtooth Land Surveying, LLC 2030 5. Washington Ave. �0,44 Northwest Blvd.,Ste. G 14 1 1"Avenue East Emmett, V 83C 17 Gaeur d'Alene, ID 83814 Jerome, ID 63338 e rd��iure . P: (208)398.81 04 F: (208)714.4544 F:(205)3 29-5303 ' F: (208)398-5105 Pr(208)292-4453 Fr(208)324-382 I R-40 Re-Zone Description BASIS OF BEARING for this description is South 89139'12"West, from the illegible brass cap marking the E114 Corner of Section 32 and the 518"rebar PLS 4431 marking the 0/4 Corner of Section 32, both in T. 4 N., R. 1 E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. A parcel of land being a portion of Lot 3, Block 1 of 3asmine Acres, as shown in Book 59 of Plats, at Page 5829, Ada County Records, located in the NE1/4 of the SE114 of Section 32, T. 4 N., R. 1 E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the illegible brass cap marking the E1/4 Corner of said Section 32; Thence South 89039'12"West, coincident with the north line of said SE114 of Section 32, a distance of 1026.70 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1 of said Jasmine Acres; Thence South 0"20'48"East, coincident with the west boundary line of said Lot 1, a distance of 346.83 feet to the northwest comer of said Lot 3; Thence North 891,42'00" East, coincident with the north boundary line of said Lot 3, a distance of 43.10 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing, North 89042'00" East, coincident with said north boundary line of Lot 3, a distance of 521.16 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 3; Thence South 0001'00"East, coincident with the east boundary line of said Lot 3, a distance of 316.85 feet to the southeast corner of said Lot 3; Thence South 89042'00"West, coincident with the south boundary line of said Lot 3, a distance of 519.60 feet; Thence North 00018'00"West, 316.85 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, The above described parcel contains 3.79 acres, more or less. b is 5 7 4 � ,a SEAC+� R=18118094-13ELANO SUBDIVISION-CMG1SurveylDrawingslDescrlptions118094 R40 RE-ZONE ❑ESCRIPTION.docx • � 1 Page 25 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 242 of 265 a4S7SOF .5 89.39'12'W 2M94.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N 8T39W'a 727.70' S 89-3911r w _ — — 102&2v SEC3Z SEC 32 I E I/4 CORI1gt C 1/4 LaYMER O 1 I WTL NA"I 4 ,y JASPRNE ACRES Z 9.00C 1 N NNN LINE TA91E 11 N89M WE 521.16' PRIM LINE BEARING D O 1 11 Nffil"1 0'f 1 .Itl z d 3I LOT 3,BLOM I R-40 I w l I 3.79 AC+ o LOT%max I EIASMZNEIV I I 5 89°42'BO"W 519,fid SF CORNER SEC 32 NT5 L a 1 1 5 7.d f s PROJECT: OWNEW EVELO ER: 2030 S. WASHINGTON AVE, DWG x �f BOLL COOK Sj 18094-EX DELANO ZONING R-40 EMMETT,ID-8104 INVESTMENTS,LLC 9$of SOP BOUNDARY �. P.(208 398 8104 a80949r d F:(208 398-8103 I8094 FFF8EA�4 T.4 C.,R.1 , B.M., 5.�M07- S„� AOA COUNTY IDAHO DATE: ���1 3/2020 �` n7 WWW.SAW rOOTHLS.COM 1 OF 1 Page 26 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 243 of 265 C. Preliminary Plat(date: 2/ 4�n 3/12/2020)&Phasing Plan REVISED PREL MINMY PLAT FOR E,ELANO SUBDIVISION Sw .u..• AM 20io .Ho i w..�. .w-.�. �—� W �Wy ud oc �o Q --------------- i --- - --- --� - Yj a o L-------- w 16'COufttm six[[ iY�w1 Jett � Fe is '§ 1 p o 3 o PP1.1 Page 27 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 244 of 265 11IMMINARY PLAT FOR LaeLo - D"NOSUBDIVISION - LOr a ewee�,ywuxcuxesaxo 3 w+umovnrteos �acalrn iu rulx iizor rxes lnsEcnox sz 'z1�. -� - -.,. =omswv.ucam wzwol uss,eza. — L - ^��--. non caunr,ionxo �7 y Ze -- — — mores umL ocwLn 000 --- ------------ Elm n 3. YM[ isme.m.aumtirr rww Z g NOW III '_ I I MwK I I I I MEU SERA 36'COLLFLTM 5�4FFr XClIMii�'. IS LOGIL SAFFr YCipN PP1.0 Page 28 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 245 of 265 D. Landscape Plan(date: 2/'�T3/14/2020) REVISED NOTES PLANT PALETTE r....r. ,...,. ..,., Ou� �,r�,K.�... q �,..,..,....,. ..,,.�...em .�....a,..... .�.... ft ! I ..vim. '�' � ��/ �� � rv.,•.a,K........,,����.a,R.,.. ��.. r.,..,. i:.; P .e u. _ '� ,gem.n rma r.neea•st.Q2,mm_ v JENSENBELTi =7DEVELOPMENT DATA wn Q TREE GLANTiN6i5TAKCNS Q PLANTER cur eEv EvsE F'�N: 0 IL „ �. FEB J _ Z LANDSCAPE GALGULATIONS -- LU�CBCAP! Li y`TES PLANT PALETTE S..f.. un+�rc wrs�e:,xw O 5i N2itl RAN;INV M��� w..,xi w � • 1" H it 11E DEVELOPMENT DATA Oj TREE PLANTWG TPKINb 5 Ow _ Q AWL PFN/,GY+ZE r O5 WR T IFPN FENCE Z qLLI T - I LAI.PSGAPC Q • _ W GALGLLA*lo\_ rc W.- .. LANDSCAPE i -..... PLAN it • e w t r Page 29 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 246 of 265 NOTES PLANT PALETTE It im u ,..0 rumic m�.w.renn,ur mff moo.®. - w JENSEN66LT4 DEVELOPMENT DATA O ipPE PL4NiIN6/STAKINS O PLaNTEa ane.�.�.amv.nx ease cr�werrun.,x uu � mc.w wmwm•re...,,,., x O w W a ❑ z a 9'V N PaIVAC FENCE O y(aWbHi�rz�.n FENCE Z �• Q a -_ LRNDSGRPE ❑ W 6ALGULA710N5 p� a QQ �uNoecAPE PLAN � roM�M m L1 Page 30 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 247 of 265 E. Possible Conceptual Development Plan for Parcel to the North ' � 1 - 4 Passible Future Development Pattern - r A rr S� 14, I I Page 31 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 248 of 265 F. Qualified Open Space Exhibit& Site Amenities REVISED N W w o x goo I I ' 1 T3857 SF 1 ffl 1 I I I _ I I � I 3786 SF I— 378a SF 1 7372 SF I I I 1.17 acres of qualified open DELANO ACE EXHI OPEN SPACE IXIMT space without crossed out area RESIDENTIAL AREA=111 43 ACRES QUALIFYING OPEN SPACE—Yl.23 ACRES(10.890 Note: The crossed out area does not count toward the minimum qualified open space standards because it isn't accessible at the west end,per UDC 11-3G-3B.le. Page 32 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 249 of 265 PROJECT AMENITIES As the developer we have researched and interviewed potential homeowners and followed the city ordinance to plan the most productive amenities for this area and this development. The amenity package exceeds the requirement of Meridian City Code. Meridian City Code requires that the application provide one amenity for projects up to 20 acres.We are proposing five additional amenities for a total of six, including a neighborhood park with a shade structure, a play structure,seating area, climbing boulders,climbing dome and a pedestrian pathway.We are proposing a second open space lot on the southwest corner of the development. This lot will help to buffer the existing home in the Champion Park Subdivision and will include several amenities including public art and a seating area. Proposed Amenities: Large 2/3-Acre Neighborhood Park-The large park will contain the following recreation facilities: Shade Structure Play structure Seating areas with benches Climbing Dame Climbing Boulders Public Art I I. L!4qN(,f'i R' ♦ I � W'v Y d -2 t GLINHIN BC(ADER5, I.pe e0 i! GNIG TM ;J 10 ' Page 33 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 250 of 265 G. Conceptual Building Elevations(Single-Family^Detached and Multi-Family Apartments)REVISED PROPOSED HOME ELEVATIONS AND HOUSING STYLES t 1 M J Page 34 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 251 of 265 y� i G Page 35 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 252 of 265 •j {r�, iF- MONA r+ - Page • Meridian • •Agenda April 16,2020 r, N+ � r Page 37 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 254 of 265 H. Parking Exhibit REVISED 0 58 parking spaces z Z a o O w ---- — -- — (n a 0 a" •a»ce � m J ® Q 6 W f o ❑- -----}— --� I - 1— -� a LANOBCAPE ease c«�o ee.oi PLAN Li Page 38 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 255 of 265 I. Site Plan ° , ------------ _ - - - __________ _ L2 . t- �4 N W DELANO SUBEIIASION SITE LAYOUT �J VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. A Development Agreement(DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance,a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum,incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat,phasing plan, landscape plan and conceptual building elevations included in Section VII and the provisions contained herein. Page 39 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 256 of 265 b. A Conditional Use Permit is required to be submitted and approved for the multi-family development prior to application for Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review. c. All multi-family structures shall comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. An application for Design Review and Certificate of Zoning Compliance shall be submitted and approved for all multi-family structures prior to submittal of building permit applications. d. Single-family homes along the west and north perimeter boundaries of the development shall be restricted to a single-story in height as proposed by the Developer. e. The rear and/or side of 2-story structures on Lots 8-12, Block 1 and Lot 2,Block 5 that face N. Centrepointe Way shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays, banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. f. The construction of N. Centrepointe Way from the southern boundary to the northern boundary of the annexation area(stub to Wong parcel#R4582530100) shall occur with the first phase of development. g. The R-8 and R-15 zoned property totaling 11.3+/-acres shall provide a minimum of 1.13 acres and the R-40 zoned property totaling 3.6+/-acres shall provide a minimum of 0.36 of an acre (in addition to the open space required in UDC 11-4-3-27C for multi-family developments). i. Provide vehicular connection to the property to the east(Parcel#R4582530202)through the R-40 zoned property via a local street or a driveway as set forth in UDC 11-3A-3A.3. If a driveway is provided,provide a cross-access/ingress-egress easement to that property; submit a recorded copy of the easement to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. j. No building permits shall be issued on this site until the underlying property is recorded in a final plat. 2. The preliminary plat included in Section VII.B,shall be revised at least 10 days prior to the City Council hearing as follows: a. Depict an easement for the Nourse Lateral along the north boundary of the site. If the easement is 10 feet or greater, it shall be located within a common lot that is a minimum 20-feet wide and outside of a fenced area unless modified by City Council as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6D.If the lateral is located completely off-site and an easement does not encroach on this site, submit written confirmation of such from the Irrigation District. b. The street buffer and minimum 5-foot wide detached sidewalk on the east side of N. Centrepointe Way shall be included in the first phase(instead of the third phase) of development;the phase boundary shall be adjusted accordingly. Page 40 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 257 of 265 3. The landscape plan included in Section VILC shall be revised at least 10 days prior to the City Council hearing as follows: a. Include mitigation information on the plan for any existing trees on the site that are not removed by the residential property owner for fire wood in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-10C.5. b. Include the linear feet of parkways and the required vs. proposed number of trees in the Landscape Calculations table demonstrating compliance with the standards in UDC I I- 3A-17 and 11-3B-7C. c. Include the linear feet of street buffers and the required vs.proposed number of trees in the Landscape Calculations table demonstrating compliance with the standards in UDC 11-3B-7C. d. Depict trees and shrubs in the minimum 20-foot wide street buffers along N. Centrepointee Way in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-7C. 4. The 50-foot wide private street easement(i.e. Jasmine Lane) shall be relinquished where it crosses the subject property. Proof of relinquishment shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 5. North Dashwood Pl. shall be extended as a full access street into the site with the first phase of development in accord with UDC 11-3A-3. 6. Local street access (or a driveway with a cross-access easement) shall be provided to the property to the east of the R-40 zoned property(Parcel#R4582530202) as set forth in UDC 11-3A-3A.3. The Applicant should coordinate with the developer of that property on a location for the access. If a driveway is provided, a recorded copy of the cross-access easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer for the phase in which it is located(third phase). 7. For lots accessed by common driveways, an exhibit shall be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks, fencing,building envelope and orientation of the lots and structures. Driveways for abutting properties that aren't taking access from the common driveway(s) shall be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line away from the common driveway. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited unless separated by a minimum 5-foot wide landscaped buffer. 8. Provide address signage for homes accessed by the common driveways on Lot 5,Block 1 and 9,Block 4 for emergency wayfinding purposes. 9. A perpetual ingress/egress easement is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder for all common driveways,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. A copy of the recorded easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 10. All existing structures on the site shall be removed prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat phase in which they are located. 11. Parking is restricted to only one side of the 27-foot wide street sections; signage shall be installed prohibiting parking on one side of the street to ensure emergency access can be provided. Page 41 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 258 of 265 B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 A street light plan will need to be included in the final plat application. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the City's Design Standards. A copy of the standards can be found at http://Www.meridianciN.oMIpublic_works.aspx?id=272 1.2 The following proposed manholes have less than 3'of cover: A-3,A-4,A-5, C-1 and D-5. Public Works has previously discussed with the applicant the possibility of using grinder pumps in these shallow areas,but the plans do not note the use of them. If the parcel to the north of the multi-family is to be served by Meridian, applicant must stub sewer at minimum slope in N. Centrepointe Way to the north boundary line. 1.3 Each phase must be modeled to ensure adequate fire flow. 1.4 Public Works has met with SUEZ Water and agreed that water service to the north for the multi-family portion of the development will be provided according to how annexation proceeds. Meridian will provide water in Meridian, and SUEZ will provide water in Boise. If the area being considered for inclusion is to be served by the City of Meridian, the Public Works Department would like to have a completed water main loop north to the existing water main in E. Wainwright Drive. The purpose of this loop is not for flow and pressure reasons,it is to create redundancy and for mitigation of water quality concerns created by dead end mainlines. 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2"x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year- round source of water(MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a Page 42 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 259 of 265 single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at(208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing,landscaping, amenities, etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer,an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation Page 43 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 260 of 265 district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public—works.aspx?id=272. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond.Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancioy.or /WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=184561&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit X D. POLICE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancioy.orglWebLink/Browse.aspx?id=184570&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit X E. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO(COMPASS) http://weblink.meridiancioy.ory wweblink8/0/doc/165379IPa eg 1.aspx F. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT http://weblink.meridiancily.org wweblink8/0/doc/16523IlPagel.aspx G. SETTLER'S IRRIGATION DISTRICT http://weblink.meridianciV.or lweblink8/0/docll64812IPa eg 1.aspx H. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT http://weblink.meridianciV.or lWebLink8lDocView.aspx?id=165010&dbid=0 Page 44 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 261 of 265 I. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) http://weblink.meridianci U.orblweblink8/0/doc/164959IPage 1.aspx J. WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT(WASD) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=179144&dbid=0&repo=Meridian C Lty K. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https://weblink.meridiancity.orzlWebLink/Browse.aspx?id=184481&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit Y L. CITY OF BOISE https://weblink.meridiancity.ory/WebLink/browse.aspx?id=184571&&dbid=0&&repo=Meridian Ci IX. FINDINGS AUpon feeommendation from the. COMPFehensive Plan Alap Amendment Commission, shall, the Gotmeil shall make a full ifwestig and a4 the > the Comprehensive Dl.,.-. she 6.,unee;1 sl..,ll make the following findings: Code.1. The proposed amendmef4 is eeasistent with the other-elements of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed amendment provides an impfeved guide to fbtufe grevAh and development Of the eit-y. par-eel of land that k eurr-ent4,in Me 00,efBeise;q planning areafeF development in the 011 the Gempr-eh-nsive Plan. 4. The proposed amendment is eensisteal with the Unified Development Code, Develepment 5. The amendment will be eempatible with existing and planned stwetmdiag!a-nd uses. Page 45 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 262 of 265 The Gemmi7gigienfin&Mat thepi-opesed amendment will not bur-ikfi existing an,4191anne senke eapabilities in this 19ertion of the eity. Sewer and water serviees a,-e available to be extended to this.site. allows soffieient area to fnitiga4e any apAieipa4ed impaet asseeia4ed with the development of the area. 9. The proposedamendment; in the Lost ipAerest f the City,.4'Meridian. the proposed aniendment is in the best interest of the Oty,if the par-eel to the north is.ake B. Annexation and/or Rezone (UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; Staff finds the proposal to annex and develop the subject property with R-8. R-15 and R-40 zoning consistent with the MDR and AMU--R FLUM designations. in the RE LEA!amendment-, Me Gemmis-sion finals the preposed Eem' - 4meHt is. net 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The r'.,mmis Sta ands the proposed map amendment and development complies with the purpose statement of the residential districts in that it will provide for a range of housing opportunities consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The r'..nmi:....ie Sta finds the proposed map amendment and subsequent development wou could be detrimental to the public safety and welfare due to the high volume of traffic from the proposed development and commercial development to the south that would be funneled through Alpine Point Subdivision with the extension off. Dashwood Place to E. Wainwright Dr. in the absence of a connection to Wainwright Dr. via Centrepointe Wad 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The !'..,..,.,..,.& Sta ands that City services are available to be provided to this development. The School District has submitted comments, included in Section VIII.J that currently show student enrollment is below capacity for the elementary school and over Page 46 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 263 of 265 capacity for the middle school and high school; Me G H mis- i Stafffinds the proposed map amendment would result in an adverse impact on the school district. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The G..mmis, Sta rods the proposed annexation is ne#in the best interest of the City at this time due to the G m mis-,;eH; a -iF o z.i+. having obtained approval from the City of Boise aet on a r ,u tf „e9ee ien efi o exclude the eastern portion of the subject property from their Area of City Impact boundary. Fut4h r Me G m n ; .ien find-s ''e ppfi ,.nt i C. Preliminary Plat(UDC 11-613-6) 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; (Ord. 08-1372, 7-8-2008, eff. 7-8-2008) The /"'..,,.,.,,.4 Sta ands the proposed plat is generally in conformance with the UDC if the Applicant complies with the conditions of approval in Section VIII. 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Gems n:..gie n Sta ands public services can be made available to the subject property and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; The G.,mm:..gie n Sta ands the proposed plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's CIP. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The G..mm is-sie n Sta ands there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The G.,,,,.mis. Sta ands the proposed development would could be detrimental to the public safety and general welfare due to the proposed extension off. Dashwood Pl. to Wainwright Dr. and the resulting high volume of traffic that would be routed through a residential neighborhood(Alpine Point Sub); extension off. Centrpoint Way, a collector street, to E. Wainwright Dr. should take place first. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. (Ord. 05-1170, 8- 30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) The G.,mm is-sie n Sta is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that would need to be preserved with this development. shall detennine the fellowin&- feasible. Page 47 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 264 of 265 2. The altefaa4ive eemplia-nee provides a*e"al or- for-meeting requirements; a 3. The altemative means will not be matefially detfifnental to the p4he welfafe or-impair-the intended uses and ehaFacter of suffounding pfepet4ies. properWes and will aetually be a benefit te the publie web��by,Providing a buffer beAveen Page 48 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 16,2020— Page 265 of 265 ' T 1 r rr y L • ` 'T•J �- � J 1 f w 1 Delano ~ � • •� 1. r•' �_ is k•- ,r- � iY • �{„;;� �° .4, � • .t ter. -' —t LoW es DicWsl obey sti�k Rd X# iA C* . `mayLU r .•r ��hx ALM ' �_ -- --- + N � M1f • f � r The pillage/ Kleiner Park l j 1+ai rg'eve�A _ Z Comprehensive Plan • Medium Density • Mixed Use- Regional • Recently adopted by Meridian • Most closely matches prior Boise City planning �'• ��`�'��`�' • Corresponds to designation immediately to the south Delano Actions Since Prior P&Z Meeteing oBoise City Approves Area of Impact Modification o Remand by City Council to P&Z to Consider: • Density • Connection to Dashwood Delano Act6ions Saince Preior P &Z Meetei n hf PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR LEGEND DELANO SUBDIVISION _ o New Applicant Group LOT 3 BLOCK 1,JASMINE ACRES AND 2 UNPLATTED PARCELS LOCATED IN THE N 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 SECTION 32 xa.o rAwnsm r�rsn u¢ TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH,RANGE I LAST,B.M. 1'm ADA COUNTY,IDAHO 2019 o Two Meetings with Alpine Pointe HOA Board in } —— ——� pEYELOPER CNI�ENGINEER $�RYEVDR December 2019 B ] 6 5 3 2 II 2 3 9 fi I i SPhV, (sml 33s ew tloel a+ea,. �fom)me- I 1 I I I I 'Y `--------- \ g 1 I LOT SUMMARY o Board Priorities : ,• I � ® I ' 10 y 9Nfi£F,INRY RERRMT31 66 I 6 � I a N _0..t5 I IwNRSGwc axwal Lals 4° Reduce density overall to a 1 RawROR RRI,a 3 Rz6 I6 I ; �K i i ,2 WEUC RNa1F0E-WAY x/. 353 I Et Q 12 13 19 15 16 18 19 20 ]1 i R-49 1Q1! 364 z_1 98 Reduce density on north ---- --------� � boundary & limit to single story I 2P � 3 31 3R 29 28 21 1. 25 29 23��Ez 21 a ,2I ,I 2 "GAeRE; Emergent connection only at 21 8 I I mn Kx l I Dashwoo zz I w I 1 30. 36 36 3] 39 4R 41 Qa3 94 +S CK)41 <P 48 69 C ENIA Cross-access to future multi- -------- _- ---�- ------- — ------ �`, --c--- -40 area ------------- family /R � Re-orient internal lots •%t'll.� �� :Sm .�.� i® Arm - w� �!, '� � �� � ear. 6 Changes in New Plan • Reduction from 85 to 66 lots ��ex��swre amrnslw FASTFe (22% reductions v� o • Primary access is now N. , I Centrepointe Way f • Emergency-only access at N. 5MR =- - Dashwood Ave. (temporary) T ---= --�--� • North boundary lots reduced; retained single-story limit # 9VIlpNB• '°ice#°� • Internal lots re-oriented . ' 4-L • Park expanded (and still faces Alpine Pointe) i Delano IEEkLEW HEKHTS SLBDtvNc'N T� i Revised Plan w rr" k i . a I I VIS�PI <OL.IC I } nel,vaplp 1 • Presented to Alpine Pointe �F I HOA general meeting in g g 14 X '•'t++L � February 2020 TIM"r crypt L'Pl-ft-r pj cd 1 rL� r Ij £i IFd IYIIGdILLl2 i PC"( I�rA LU{If 9 13 1 10 lu �� r 9 4 I [iuBFpUSE py1.0 hf?. I 1 F 1# Y L' d 4 �4}lE�rfiFf �RJL4FiVfI.1 7�rrrna I I p'nsuae s't:a I SMIP rpa=1 LjL"rM p3j �' low 17 111 11 1. 1f 0 11 10 1 0 f i S I r I Ly,,�,� r� p'1ar StM o �517 - �I rrr - - - - - - -- —��-- _� (.Et+r[w RQWT 54C '�1510u Example Home Elevations — 4 ■ MIA 'In= OWN rim maw" .., •�. � .! -.i� � -.ate ®M Delano Neighborhood b . Amenities One required Al { proposed : Six 2/3-acre park a • Play structure Seating area w/ benches Climbing dome Climbing boulders Public art 1 Delano Concerns Identified in Recent Correspondence • Further Reduction in Density along Northern Border • Permanent Emergency-Only Access at Dashwood Delano Northern Border • Reduced number of lots from 15 ( 5 duplexes) to 11 (all detached single-family) ( fw25% decrease ) • Average square footage up to 5,, 661sf from &43,800sf (fw50% increase) Delano Density Transition �-��•. - Existin Sin le F�mil .-� _ { Transition • • - acre (north), all the way to 22-30 units (south) ........................... Commercial, retaill multi- family, and major transit corridors in immediate vicinity T 5.*a * '2yle•Viev rw _ � �� .:; Multi-Family 9 9 iJnitslAcre i .... density e appropriate - � �� Family �-��••.'� � �' � � •_ �,: 13 Delano - 3 Development South of this PropertV Zoned R-40 , r" Built at 22-30 units per acre .. # F ;r V P 11 11 Delano Brickyard Development r-, ri rd • " amen-i �x —_ r o r r r F - ., - � � � .. �-•�••• 1+ .1�- �-�r;`r�-ram• �?T+{�� �, " � I WF !'1°'#"e C r1 y�P�f11 �f Ll rN r Delan o Dashwood Stub Connection • Meridian and ACHD require connectivity • There is an existin stub and ACHD ROW at Dashwood • As directed by Council and at urging of Alpine Pointe, revisited the question of Dashwood access • Obtained permission from ACHD to do emergency access at Dashwood 1 Delano Dashwood Stub Connection • Three Additional Points : • ACHD will not approve a permanent emergency-only limitation • ACHD will not permit E. Della Street to "punch through" to the east • ACHD will not permit the applicant to landscape within the N . Dashwood Ave. right-of-way Delano Summary • In Accord with Comprehensive Plan • Agency Approval • Infill Development = City of Meridian Priority • Significant Modifications Made to Satisfy Neighborhood Concerns Irbil Delano Requested Modifications to Conditions of Approval • Modify Condition 1.c, as follows: d. Single-family homes along the west north perimeter boundary+es of the development shall be restricted to a single-story in height as proposed by the Developer. • Delete Condition 2.b • Allow landscape and sidewalk to be installed on east side of N. Centrepoint Way with multifamily development (when designed, engineered, and entitled) 1:1� Delano Thank You Delano City of Meridian, Planning and Zoning Commission April 16, zozo at 6 PM by Malissa Bernard, Alpine Pointe HOA, Community Outreach, Chair p�n�Delano Proposal 10 January 2019 Current Plan 2020 • _ ISKIxm+,v,1�IF�lan•lorwu�wxws _ 1va114w fia 117 01 tM,:!MIC)%Pi x... w.r.r ltlwM+bfTx IJA[1 1•}7 LY MA ._---w 8 lots 4 lots 1 � 10 S lots: Difference: SFR on - - - 7 -lots 7 lots Cook � �N --- ---`--,`i'----- �...�: parcel 2019 lot 7 lots ..� . ;. 1 14 lots 10 lots ' 14 lots 10 lots ' x { Difference: High ' E • Density MFR on Cook 16 lots parcel2020 i l y ' U. L.S, it �qSL. ' Ali. 1 F � HE-k;-ku, n ddle School Maverik 2 FUtUre _ IS OVER-CONNECTED! x m%/e /;g ? ht rj <ar E MCMlllen Rd E MCMlllan /7t d t F McMillan Rd £McMillan Rd W McMillan rsurrco Albertsons M Current ingress/egress 6 Madison Park Jy� li Note: thoughtful planningfor Madison g I ?a Park/A.Pointe lessens impact upon that b a connected neighborhood Settlers Bridge IdahoStatc. Egli 3 W I;oche:to 6 F� Elocal cut-through and Ashley Manor c patterns via Alpine Older low density Rural 55 WV'ain, neighborhood—Locust Grove connection solely BioLi(e Plasma Services Q E pending ingress/egress E Paretlise[r�/S,and very close together Lai,.: Discovery Elern ry School L" EFutureommercial DELANO Technical F+ e traffic igh School Brickyard Future Troxel/Wingate light and -Conley/Rogue River Connection reaxmeusr yq • E bbyLn sra31 Commercial y,o„klu,o„m5L Summerfield panes Bread Colla=and schools at mhamplonPark EV.0 er p Leig ,and the 3,easterk entry t Improv F costa Vida uture 7roxelftngate -plex s light Settlers Bridge Cut-through Locust E A Rd r'stlak R E3 Idaho Central Grove-Alpine Pointe-Eagle Rd, E/W,W/E �O°9 Credit Union rt' chiles{jrlR 8 Bar Mapdata&201B Uri- POSSIBLE NEW iSUB - ` INGRESS/EGRESS -4 Meridianj , j PURPLE - NEW DELLA ST BASED ON EAGLE VIEW LAYOUT, AVOY'le-�;� 1 �+ CONCEPTUAL e RED COMMERCIAL • - COLLECTOR, �`, ` , •, y CONCEPTUAL GREEN - JASMINE ST WITH ► ` '' - - - EXTENSION EAST, Wong . CONCEPTUAL Rollin Er ++� In BO I S E. BLUE -STELLAR AND 1 Preliminary. SHARED LANE *, ACCESS, plat CONCEPTUAL Stellar+• ci "RANGE W EMERGENCY, ` PEDESTRIAN, BIKE IN PERPETUITY, CONCEPTUAL ` r "� • , 4 THE BOLLINGER PARCEL HAS A LOT OF RVS, AND A PRESUMED DEVELOPER AGREEMENT ACCESS POINT FOR THESE RVS AND LOT HAD BEEN ASSUMED SINCE "r THERE WAS NOT AN ACHD-MANDATED STREET IN Dashwood ' SIGN LIKE OTHER STUB STREETS. THIS DEAD-END STREET WAS ALSO ASSUMED TO BE A TURN- AROUND FOR CONSTRUCTION IN PHASE TWO SINCE ALL THE STREETS WERE NOT COMPLETE AT ONCE, NOT k UNLIKE OTHER SUBDIVISIONS DONE IN PHASES WITH * SIMILAR TURN-AROUNDS. Bollinger-;, Nouise La IL • 1 I r r ti Bollinger it aMM • Site of the future Centrepoint Commercial Collector, south of Wainwright, east of Brooksburg Cul-de- sac • No signage by ACHD or the City of Meridian. This ACHD easement it purpose is not apparent, being fully- �.- landscaped with grass and trees, with „r - utility boxes and no curb cut-out or stub section to indicate this is anything but a landscape buffer between - • • • • - • • • commercial and residential • -*A *LOT 7, Common Lot filed in BOISE on Final Plat in 2004 a *Lot 7 Common Lot deeded to ACHD in Ada Cty Nov 2005 *From the Developer's recollection he was told by ACHD that LOT 7 was for EMERGENCY ACCESS lane, not for a Commercial Collector A f ra ALIUA Ada Counly Rewlutim 2227•'Exh WA" Boise Downtown Master Street Map emrom iAa,•e rna J i` i !k, won;awnw�wrem rah,werdhn wio i a� Ya,.4 wR+L-Ih.'Yarr SuriYw i d'M�hwr.�cNMILH}TnYh�a ntl lmtllW V,y.mhy.rru�.aurw..a�ww+w,. PAIN � M1bM�tt.Lwww. ' �G LE o C —k PRESS � L -. 4 0 UJO m d 1 —rfa ' R .•w~r.r+wr r..r. S us Oro W1 9Q ■ GRANGER ■ DHINDEN BLVD J CLOVER ME WS V ■ D7 O ACHD MSM 2018 and r [Blueprint Boise Map showing USTICK Centrepoint. ACHD showing future Wainwright/Centrepoint Connection, but not until E 2018 map amendment J F VIE PINE,AVE EMERALD NOTE: Blueprint Boise Map INN shows Centrepointe linking with FRANKLIN RD 113aldcypress, not Wainwright rI r I � 7 • IN CONCLUSION, WE ARE SEEKING: • EMERGENCY ONLY at DASHWOOD in perpetuity (bike/pedestrian). Another ingress/egress at DELLA is possible for flow of traffic, without creating a TWIN de FACTO collector thru Alpine Pointe • LARGER LOTS, single story north, for better transition. • z-story transitional product on the COOK parcel. R-15 fits MU-R comp plan designation. • All construction traffic to JASMINE entry only... no exceptions except for initial utility. • FUNDS should be provided by all development for the improvement of EAGLE RD/WAINWRIGHT west. SB approach to the light on EAGLE and reconfiguration of the intersection is necessary. • There should be transparency and a named parent company for the project---no hiding behind the skirts of the LLC. • A GOOD development and traffic plan. There are many ways to develop this in fill. New in f ill development should not disrupt the homes and lives of families in 211 homes on a go- acre established neighborhood. 8 Charlene Way From:Chris Johnson Sent:Friday, April 17, 2020 10:23 AM To:Charlene Way Cc:Bill Nary; Adrienne Weatherly; Andrea Pogue Subject:FW: Delano Sub vote Please add to the minute book. From: P and D Pitzer <PITZER2020@msn.com> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 9:18 PM To: Adrienne Weatherly, Andrew Seal; Bill Cassinelli; Lisa Holland; Nick Grove; Rhonda McCarvel; Ryan Fitzgerald Cc: Chris Johnson <cjohnson@meridiancity.org>; Andrea Pogue <apogue@meridiancity.org>; Bill Nary <bnary@meridiancity.org> Subject: Delano Sub vote I don't know how this works with virtual meetings but my mic did not work - it would not come off unmute. As a public meeting I would like the public record to please record my vote as Nay as I am opposed to the motion with temporary access to Dashwood instead of it being a permanent emergency access. Regards, Patricia Pitzer 1 QUESTIONS: What is the housing type? Is it compatible? Is this a huge rental project-type for single family homes? Who is the Builder? What is the name of the parent company behind the LLC? Is the ITD Requirement for the reconstruction of the SB Eagle/Wainwright west bound turn lane going to be addressed? The applicant was directed to fund this SB approach. Will ACHD, the Cities, address the new connectivity with the inf ill of Stellar, Wong, Fast Eddy's, Cook, and Bollinger parcels? Cross-access via parking lots is not a way to address this issue, without proper access lanes. 9