The URL can be used to link to this page

2020-04-14 Regular CITY COUNCIL REGULAR C�,WE IDIAN:--- MEETING MINUTES At-. City Council Chambers 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, April 14, 2020 at 6:00 PM (called to order at 6:03 pm) Item 1: Roll-Call Attendance Liz Strader X Joe Borton X Brad Hoaglun _X Treg Bernt X Jessica Perreault X Luke Cavener X Mayor Robert E.Simison Item 2: Pledge of Allegiance Item 3: Community Invocation with Steve Moore of Ten Mile Christian Church Item 4: Adoption of Agenda - Adopted Item 5: Proclamation A. The Week of the Young Child Item 6: Action Items A. Resolution No. 20-2201: A Resolution Of The Mayor And The City Council Of The City Of Meridian, Appointing Elizabeth "Lizzie" Taylor To Seat 1 And Jenifer Cavaness-Williams To Seat 7 Of The Meridian Arts Commission; And Providing An Effective Date. — Approved B. Resolution No. 20-2202: A Resolution Of The Mayor And The City Council Of The City Of Meridian, Appointing Jared Smith To Seat 7 Of The Meridian Transportation Commission; And Providing An Effective Date. — Approved C. Resolution No. 20-2203: A Resolution Authorizing the Continuance of a Local Disaster Emergency Declaration and its Terms for an Additional Thirty (30) Days; Authorizing the Continued Immediate Expenditure of Public Money to Safeguard Life, Health and Property; and Providing an Effective Date. — Approved D. Public Hearing: Proposed 2020 Summer Fee Schedule of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department E. Resolution No. 20-2192: A Resolution Adopting the Summer 2020 Fee Schedule of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department; Authorizing the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department to Collect Such Fees; and Providing an Effective Date - Approved F. Public Hearing: Community Development Block Grant Program Year 2019 Action Plan Amendment — Continued to April 28, 2020 G. Resolution 20-2191: A Resolution Approving Adoption Of A Substantial Amendment To The Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan For Program Year 2019; Authorizing The Mayor And City Clerk To Execute And Attest The Same On Behalf Of The City Of Meridian; Authorizing The Community Development Program Coordinator To Submit The Same To The United States Department Of Housing And Urban Development; And Providing An Effective Date H. Public Hearing for Blue Valley Elementary School (H-2020-0023) by Becky Yzaguirre, The Land Group, Located at 1830 W. American Fork Dr. —Approved 1. Request: To vacate the portion of note #17 on the Southridge Subdivision No. 1 plat that prohibits direct lot or parcel access to S. Spanish Fork Way. I. Public Hearing for Idaho Central Credit Union (H-2020-0016) by Idaho Central Credit Union, Located at 3152 W. Peak Cloud Ln. — Continued to May 5, 2020 1. Request: Modification to the Existing Development Agreement for TM Creek Subdivision (Inst. 201 7-1 1 3747) to update the conceptual development plan for the site to allow for the development of a financial institution with a drive-through. J. Public Hearing for Bannock Ridge (H-2019-0143) by Ryan Recla, Located at 2940 S. Mesa Way - Denied 1. Request: Development Agreement Modification to remove the subject 4.26 acre property from the boundary of the existing agreement (Bannock Ridge - Inst. #2017-084176) for the purpose of entering into a new agreement consistent with the proposed development plan; and, 2. Request: A Preliminary Plat consisting of 10 building lots and 5 common lots on 4.26 acres of land in the R-4 zoning district. K. Public Hearing for Andorra Senior Living (H-2019-0127) by Sawtooth Development Group, LLC, Located at 715 & 955 S. Wells St. and 971 E. Wells Circle — Continued to May 19, 2020 1. Request: Annexation of 16.99 acres of land with TN-R zoning with a conceptual development plan for a senior (age 55 and older) living community consisting of (76) single-family dwelling units and a 3-story apartment building with 88 dwelling units and a building footprint of 30,000 square feet; and, 2. Request: Request to Vacate existing ACHD right-of-way (un- named cul-de-sac) consisting of 0.45 of an acre of land that lies between the properties located at 715 and 955 S. Wells St. & 971 E. Wells Circle. Item 6: Ordinances [Action Item] A. Ordinance No. 20-1878: An Ordinance (H-2019-0109 — Edington Commons) for Annexation of a Parcel of Land Being a Portion of the W '/2 SW '/4 SW '/4 of Section 36 Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, as Described in Attachment "A" and Annexing Certain Lands and Territory, Situated in Ada County, Idaho, and Adjacent and Contiguous to the Corporate Limits of the City of Meridian as Requested by the City of Meridian; Establishing and Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification of 14.564 Acres of Land From RUT to R-15 (Medium High Density Residential) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code; Providing That Copies of This Ordinance Shall be Filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as Required by Law; and Providing for a Summary of the Ordinance; and Providing for a Waiver of the Reading Rules; and Providing an Effective Date - Approved Item 7: Future Meeting Topics Meeting adjourned at 9:26 p.m. Meridian City Council April 14, 2020. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:03 p.m., Tuesday, April 14, 2020, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Joe Borton, Luke Cavener, Treg Bernt, Jessica Perreault and Brad Hoaglun. Members Absent: Liz Strader. Also present: Chris Johnson, Adrienne Weatherly, Bill Nary, Sonya Allen, Bill Parsons, Brian Harper, Joe Bongiorno and Dean Willis. Item 1: Roll-call Attendance: Liz Strader _X_ Joe Borton _X_ Brad Hoaglun _X_Treg Bernt X Jessica Perreault _X Luke Cavener _X_ Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Okay. Well, I'm going to call this meeting to order. For the record it is Tuesday, April 14, 2020, at 6:03 p.m. We will begin this meeting with roll call attendance. Item 2: Pledge of Allegiance Simison: Item 2 is the Pledge of Allegiance. We will see how this goes. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) Item 3: Community Invocation with Steve Moore of Ten Mile Christian Church Simison: We will now turn it over to Item No. 3, our community invocation Steve Moore of Ten Mile Christian Church. Moore: Let's bow our heads. God in Heaven, we just acknowledge that we are a community that is under your providence and I am grateful that I am a part of a community that pauses when we do business to recognize that you are the true leader of our world and of our universe and we praise you for that. We have just come through the -- the journey to the cross and we have found the empty tomb and that and these circumstances this year has impacted our lives in new and additional ways. I pray that the lessons we are learning as we are working together as a community to -- to stop something that -- that's really destructive, I pray that we will keep that lesson and we will retrieve that lesson of how well our community can work together. I pray that that spirit will be over this very Council meeting, that tonight that there will just be camaraderie and a unity among our Council and our Mayor as they make decisions that are in the best interest of our community. We pray for -- for that direction and for your protection. God, particularly we Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 28 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 2 of 61 are missing one of our Council Members here tonight, Liz Strader, and I pray for--for her family and the loss of her father-in-law and we pray that this -- this time when it's so hard to deal with things that even the loss of life and that your -- your care will be with them, your spirit will bring them comfort and just that you would be with them in this hour. God, while we are making requests, I -- I both make request and express gratitude for those in the medical community that are serving us and putting their lives in a difficult situation and there is so many emotions besides the physical in their-- in their needs. I pray, God, also for first responders and for people involved in businesses that are providing us food and those sort of services that we all need, that you would protect them, give them special wisdom. I pray for our community that we would follow the leadership of our Mayor and our Council in just keeping a healthy community the best we can. We pray for your intervention and that our world -- would just move to a place that's safe again. We pray that this virus could be -- could be stopped swiftly. Be with those especially that have been affected financially, that their lives are upside down because of this, may we be neighbors to them in this season as well and come alongside them. God, we are grateful for your gift of love in Jesus Christ and in his name I pray, amen. Simison: Thank you, Pastor Moore. Appreciate it very much. Moore: Thank you, you guys. God bless you. Item 4: Adoption of Agenda Simison: Okay. Item No. 3. I'm sorry. Item No. 4 is adoption of the agenda. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: Let me get to my notes here. I'm -- there is -- there is going to be some changes to the agenda this evening, this regular meeting. We are going to -- Item 6-F and 6-G have requested to be continued to April 28th and Item 6-K has requested to be continued to May 19th. With those changes I move that we approve the agenda as amended. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I second the adoption of the agenda as amended. Simison: Okay. I have a motion and a second to approve the adoption of the agenda as amended. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 29 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 3 of 61 Item 5: Proclamation A. The Week of the Young Child Simison: Okay. So, next item we have on the agenda, Item 5-A is a proclamation for The Week of the Young Child. So, I do have a proclamation. We will pretend like I'm down, turn around the podium for this proclamation. But we are joined by Beth Oppenheimer, who is here to represent The Week of the Young Child. So, I'm going to go ahead and read this proclamation and, then, ask Beth for any comments she -- that she would like to make after the reading. Whereas the City of Meridian, in conjunction with the Idaho Association for the Education of Young Children and the National Association for the Education of Young Children, are celebrating The Week of the Child -- of the young --The Week of the Young Child and whereas these organizations are working to promote and inspire high quality early childhood experiences for our state's youngest citizens, that provide a foundation of learning and success for children in Meridian, and whereas teachers and others who work with or on behalf of young children from birth through age eight make a difference in the lives and deserve thanks and recognition and whereas public policy supporting early learning for all are crucial to young children's futures and to the prosperity of our society and whereas this is a time to recognize the importance of children's earliest years and shaping their development and to recommit ourselves to ensuring that each and every child experiences a type of environment at home, at childcare, at school and in the community that will promote early learning. Therefore, I, Mayor Robert E. Simison, proclaim April 11 th through 17th, 2020, to be The Week of the Young Child in the City of Meridian and encourage all citizens to work and support the efforts of Idaho AUIS and NAEYC and invest in early childhood in our community. Dated this 14th day of April 2020. So, Beth, thank you for giving me the opportunity to present this and we will invite you to make any comments. Oppenheimer: Thank you so much, Mr. Mayor and Members of the Council. I really appreciate you taking the time to issue a proclamation for Week of the Young Child. It's interesting this time, it -- this is an annual celebration that recognizes across the country our youngest children and especially those who work with and care for our youngest children, including parents and grandparents and family members, childcare providers, and everyone who joins together to support our youngest children and interesting that it happens to fall during this time and I hope that we can all take an opportunity, especially those childcare providers who have remained open to serve families of our essential workers during this time and -- and I think it's important to remember that our childcare providers are also essential workers, especially as they are caring for the young children that are keeping -- trying to keep our families healthy and safe as well. Real quickly I just wanted to say another thing about Week of the Young Child. All this week there is a theme every week -- or every day of this week. Yesterday was Music Monday and that's an opportunity to promote music and young children and whether that's singing a song or -- or playing some instrument or something like that, encouraging folks to participate in music. Today is Tasty Tuesday and I have heard lots of great stories of families and caregivers cooking with their young children. It's a great way to incorporate early math skills with our young children. Tomorrow is Work Together Wednesday. So, we will be Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 30 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 4 of 61 promoting some activities that -- that everybody can join in and work together. It's a little bit different now that we are doing it virtually, but -- but we are still doing everything we can in our communities across the state to work together. Thursday is Artsy Thursday, so we are promoting art activities with young children and, then, we finish the week with Family Friday and we all know we are spending a lot of time with our families right now and so Friday is really a good time to reflect on the importance of family and the importance of supporting all of our young children. So, thank you again for issuing the proclamation. I believe at this point we have 25 cities across the state who have issued proclamations and we are so thankful. Idaho has the most cities and communities throughout the country that are issuing proclamations and I'm so happy that the City of Meridian has been in on this. So, thank you so much. Simison: Thank you, Beth. Appreciate it very much. Council, any -- any comments you would like to make? Okay. Appreciate it very much. Oppenheimer: Thank you so much. Item 6: Action Items A. Resolution No. 20-2201: A Resolution Of The Mayor And The City Council Of The City Of Meridian, Appointing Elizabeth Lizzie" Taylor To Seat 1 And Jenifer Cavaness-Williams To Seat 7 Of The Meridian Arts Commission; And Providing An Effective Date. Simison: Okay. Moving on to Item 6-A. Council, the item you have before you is appointment of two individuals, Lizzie Taylor and Jennifer Cavaness-Williams to the Meridian Arts Commission. I was able to sit down with Leslie Mauldin and these two individuals prior to the COVID outbreak, but the appointment got a little waylaid as we were focused on some other items. I think that these two individuals and our conversation with Leslie will bring some good additional viewpoints to the commission. Both of them have artist genes that they are both actively a part of that, but they also bring a business sense to it with the loss of Gretchen Caserotti off of the Arts Commission, having -- having someone that really is also focused on the ins and outs of what needs to occur in terms of events and activities and looking at things in a different perspective, I think that that does something that -- especially that Jennifer brings to the commission with -- with her background and her perspective, but I -- I'm excited to nominate these two and I would be happy to stand for any questions. Okay. Do I have a motion? Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I move that we approve Resolution No. 20-2201, appointing Elizabeth Lizzie Taylor to Seat One and Jennifer Cavaness-Williams to Seat Seven of the Meridian Arts Commission. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 31 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 5 of 61 Cavener: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve Resolution No. 20-2201. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed? The ayes have it. Thank you very much. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Simison: And I do see that we have Jennifer Cavaness-Williams. I would see if she has any comments that she would like to make at this point in time now that she's been appointed. Cava ness-Williams: Can you hear me? Simison: Yes, we can. Cava ness-Williams: I just want to say thank you for this opportunity. I'm really looking forward to serving in this capacity. B. Resolution No. 20-2202: A Resolution Of The Mayor And The City Council Of The City Of Meridian, Appointing Jared Smith To Seat 7 Of The Meridian Transportation Commission; And Providing An Effective Date. Simison: All right. Well, thank you, Jennifer. Appreciate you being here remotely. Okay. And I did not see Lizzie on the line or in the audience, so with that we will move on to Item 6-B, Resolution No. 20-2202 appointing Jared Smith to Seat Seven of the Meridian Transportation Commission. We had two great applicants for this seat. Jared brought a different-- I think the other applicant was someone that was much more into the -- he was a traffic engineer by -- by their profession and we already have quite a few traffic engineers currently on the Transportation Commission. So, Jared brought a little bit more of just a regular everyday perspective, you know, is new to the community and is looking to get involved in transportation issues and just really a passion for serving, a passion for the community and wanting to be involved and interested in transportation. So, I did reach out to the other applicant and told them to -- encouraged them to continue to apply and he said that he would, especially when we had someone that currently has traffic engineering experience maybe steps off the commission, so I would like to recommend that we appoint Jared to the commission. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I don't know if anyone has any comments. I will just -- another opportunity to speak so highly of our Transportation Commission and your point is well heard, we have got a lot of great engineers, but I'm really excited about this proposed appointee and if Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 32 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 6 of 61 nobody has any questions or comments, I would be happy to make a motion. Mr. Chair, I move we approve Resolution No. 20-2202 appointing Jared Smith to Seat Seven of the Meridian Transportation Commission. Perreault: Second. Hoaglun: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to appoint Jared Smith to the Meridian Transportation Commission. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. C. Resolution No. 20-2203: A Resolution Authorizing the Continuance of a Local Disaster Emergency Declaration and its Terms for an Additional Thirty (30) Days; Authorizing the Continued Immediate Expenditure of Public Money to Safeguard Life, Health and Property; and Providing an Effective Date. Simison: And I do not see Jared in the queue, so with that we will move on to Item 6-C. Johnson: Mr. Mayor, before you go to that, we have had several people raising their hands. I didn't know if you had a moment to talk about how the process will work this evening on the public hearings. Simison: Are they asking questions specifically to that do we think? Johnson: I am not sure. I can only -- I can only allow them to talk when they raise their hand. Simison: Do you have the question function enabled that they could send questions to you? Johnson: We do not have the Q and Afor this. Simison: Okay. Well, then, I guess if Council is amenable we can open up to see the one question that someone is asking. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Bernt: Go ahead, Luke. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 33 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 7 of 61 Cavener: I assume we are going to say the same thing. This new approach I'm all about -- at least if the public has questions, want to get some clarification on the process, I think, Mr. Mayor, you will do a good job of letting the public know this isn't an opportunity to testify, but just to ask questions from a process standpoint and I'm supportive. Simison: Okay. All right. Chris, if you want to open it up for Mr. Binford, so we can see what question he asks. Mr. Binford, what question do you have? Binford: Yeah. Can you hear me okay? Simison: Yes. Binford: Yeah. My only question was there was an earlier move to move out some of the agenda items and I wasn't sure which of those -- it was pretty quick, so I would like to understand which ones were actually pushed. Simison: Treg, can you repeat that? Bernt: Sure. Binford: In specific I'm -- after the Bannock Ridge. What is it, 6-J? Bernt: Sure. Binford: Was that -- was that part of the original push? Bernt: So, Mr. Binford, thank you for your question. The Bannock Ridge item is still on the agenda for this evening. We requested to continue the -- Item 6-F and 6-G that have to do with our Community Development Block Grant-- Block Grant program and also Item 6-K was continued until May 19th. That was for a public hearing forAndorra Senior Living. Binford: It was just kind of quick through -- through those extensions and we were just trying to follow up with the agenda and what that meant for us. Bernt: I appreciate it. It's my fault. I should have been more clear. Binford: Thank you. Bernt: You're welcome. Simison: All right. Thank you. And, Chris, you will just have to -- I will trust that you will notify us if there is other questions that pop up from the -- from the community. So, with that we will move to Item 6-C. Mr. Nary, is this something you would like to speak to? Nary: Yes, sir. Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, for the public's benefit this is an extension of the emergency declaration that was done 30 days ago. It expires this Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 34 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 8 of 61 Thursday, so this will extend that time period for any necessity -- necessities and whether it be procurement or some other actions that the Mayor may need to take while this Governor's order is both in effect, as well as what might come next. So, this is just a continuation. It's required by code to come back to you within the 30 day time period for an additional extension. So, that's what it is. Simison: Thank you, Bill. Council, do you have any questions? Okay. Do I have a motion? Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I move that we approve Resolution No. 20-2203, a resolution authorizing the continuance of a local disaster emergency declaration and items for an additional 30 days. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I second that motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve Resolution No. 22-03 -- 2203. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not -- Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: Just to echo what was stated last -- last time when we made this motion from Councilman Cavener. Just know that I think we are doing -- I think I can speak on behalf of Council, I think you have done a phenomenal job in -- in leading our city during this -- this -- this -- this trying time period and I also wanted to reach out and say thank you to staff who have supported you in your efforts as well. So, thank you very much. Simison: Thank you, Councilman. And as I have said --told many other people, it makes it really easy to do yourjob when you got a great team. If-- if there is no further discussion on the motion, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. D. Public Hearing: Proposed 2020 Summer Fee Schedule of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 35 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 9 of 61 Simison: Item 6-D is a public hearing on the proposed 2020 summer fee schedule for the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department. It looks like I will turn this over to Garrett. White: Okay. Can you guys hear me all right? Simison: Yes. White: Right on. Well, thank you guys very much for having me tonight. Before you is the summer 2020 program fee proposals and schedule. The class fees listed are fees set by instructors per our contract with them and all internal recreation program fees are set to cover all direct costs of the program. Really with that I will stand with any questions anybody might have. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Mr. Mayor, I think you are muted, but I think you are giving me the okay to go ahead. Simison: Councilman Cavener, yes. Cavener: Garrett, appreciate you bringing in this each time. I don't mean to put you on the spot, but can you just give Council and the public an understanding about what happens in terms of classes and programs that we are offering if they have to be cancelled because of continuing statewide orders? White: Sure. Sure. Right now we are just kind of taking it almost day by day just like everybody else is. Really it comes to -- you know, the size of the class comes into play. What the governor's order is. What our city stance is on all this COVID-19 concerns. Right now we have been refunding some classes if they have been canceled due to the COVID-19 and we are basically postponing or extending some of the programs if need be, like softball or volleyball and things like that. And, then, on top of that with the classes and stuff with our instructors, we are communicating with instructors and trying to make things work the best we can, but the reality of it is we are postponing things and/or ultimately if we have to cancel we refund fees. I hope that answers that question. Cavener: Sorry. Mr. Mayor. Thank you. Mr. Mayor, a follow up, though, if I may. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Garrett, can you share with us -- you know, we have had a lot of conversations as a Council about full, partial, no cost recovery. Where do these classes fall? Are they a full cost recovery? Are they a partial cost recovery? Help me understand that. White: Sure. So, right now our contract instructors are on an 80/20 split. So, they get 80 percent of the fees and we get 20 percent of the fees and the 20 percent helps cover the admin -- administrative costs. For our youth programs that we run internally, such as like summer camp and things like that, the program fees cover those costs with a ten percent administrative cost built into that program fee as well. For the adult sports Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 36 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 10 of 61 program it's a 20 percent admin cost compared to the ten percent with the youth and all the program fees cover all the direct costs of that. So, like with the summer camp, for example, all the direct costs include our seasonal staff, transportation, our field trips, our arts and craft supplies, things like that. So, all those -- that -- that cost recovery model was adopted in our parks master plan update that we did. I want to say it was late December, January of '15, '16, something like that. But that -- that's kind of how our cost recovery model currently works. Cavener: So, Mr. Mayor, a follow up then. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Garrett, is it possible, then, that some of our classes we are not recovering the full cost to operate it? The 20 percent administrative costs? But say, for instance, the adult flag football or ballet three where it's a 20 percent, are we confident that -- that we are recovering the total cost to operate that program and the overhead and maintenance of our buildings, facilities, etcetera? White: Councilman Cavener, good question. So, we look at each one of our programs with a different or a separate budget per program and that's kind of how we come up with our fees. So, in that -- in that budget -- I know when I was doing adult sports say such as flag football, we added every kind of cost we could think of when it came to the cost of flights, like to line paint, to the flags, to the pylons, to the cones and everything we could think of to cover all those direct costs for that. So, to answer your question, each of those either break even that include the 20 percent admin cost and/or, you know, make a little bit of money based on if we have higher numbers than projected. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, one more if I may. Simison: Yes. And I would be happy to get rid of your question if you would like to. Cavener: No. I don't think there is really a question, I just -- I want to make sure that I'm -- I'm hearing you correctly. Is the -- the cost of the class covers all of the hard costs, facilities, equipment, officials, et cetera and, then, on top of that a 20 percent to cover the cost of staff that manage the program; is that correct? White: Correct. If I'm understanding you correctly, correct. Cavener: Okay. Simison: But I would point out that I don't think it covers the cost of what it takes to operate the Home Court to run a program within -- or all the one hundred percent of the administrative costs of our Parks and Recreation Department. There is a certain cost recovery, but it's not going to be one hundred percent of all costs to pay for every aspect of the recreational programs we do. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 37 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 11 of 61 White: Mr. Mayor, that is correct. Yeah. The Home Court is kind of its -- its own animal. Cavener: Sure. Okay. Thank you. White: Yeah. Simison: Are there any other questions for Garrett at this point in time? Do I have a motion? Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: This is a public hearing and I just wanted to check with Chris if there is anybody in the queue for this. Simison: Thank you very much for helping me get back into the public hearing mode. Yes. Is there anybody that -- in the queue or that would like to provide public testimony? And, Chris, I think that we probably have provided some information to people, but I assume we would ask people to raise their hand if they would like to provide testimony? Is the direction you are giving people at this point in time? Johnson: Yes, Mr. Mayor. We have asked people to sign up in advance and have that on our website. Adrienne will call those who have signed up in advance and, then, you can move to others who would like and I will unmute those at that time. But there were no signups in advance for this topic. Simison: Okay. Johnson: Nobody raising -- currently nobody is raising their hand. Simison: Okay. Hoaglun: So, Mr. Mayor, I don't know how long we want to pause for anybody to raise their hand -- Simison: And technically -- Bill, I'm going to ask the question. I don't know that I technically opened the public hearing in this process, so while -- while we do that why don't I open the public hearing on the proposed 2020 summer fee schedule of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department and see if there is any additional comments or public testimony at this point in time. If not, I would entertain a motion to close the public hearing. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 38 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 12 of 61 Hoaglun: I move that we close the public hearing on the proposed 2020 summer fee schedule Meridian Parks and Recreation Department. Perreault: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing on the proposed 2020 summer fee schedule of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. E. Resolution No. 20-2192: A Resolution Adopting the Summer 2020 Fee Schedule of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department; Authorizing the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department to Collect Such Fees; and Providing an Effective Date Simison: Do I have a motion? Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I move we adopt Resolution No. 20-2192, which adopts the Summer 2020 schedule for the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department. Simison: And that's Item E on the agenda? Correct, Mr. Nary? Nary: Yes, sir. Simison: Okay. Do I have a second? Perreault: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to adopt Resolution No. 20-2192. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, the clerk will call the roll. Roll call: Bernt, yea; Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, absent; Perreault, yea. Simison: All right. All ayes. Motion passes five to zero. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Simison: Thank you very much, Garrett. Appreciate your time this evening. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 39 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 13 of 61 White: Thank you, guys. F. Public Hearing: Community Development Block Grant Program Year 2019 Action Plan Amendment G. Resolution 20-2191: A Resolution Approving Adoption Of A Substantial Amendment To The Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan For Program Year 2019; Authorizing The Mayor And City Clerk To Execute And Attest The Same On Behalf Of The City Of Meridian; Authorizing The Community Development Program Coordinator To Submit The Same To The United States Department Of Housing And Urban Development; And Providing An Effective Date Simison: So, Items 6-F and G have been moved. So, we are to Item H, a public hearing for Blue Valley Elementary School, H-2020-0023. I will open this public hearing with staff comments. Nary: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Mr. Nary. Nary: You have to make a motion to move Items F and G. I think the only thing was it was noticed at the beginning that that was going to be done. Simison: Okay. All right. Thank you, Bill. Do I have a motion to move Items F and G? Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I move that we move Items 6-F and G --that's been requested to --to be continued to April 28th. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, I second the motion. Simison: I have a motion and a second to move Items F and G to April 28. Is there discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. H. Public Hearing for Blue Valley Elementary School (H-2020-0023) by Becky Yzaguirre, The Land Group, Located at 1830 W. American Fork Dr. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 40 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 14 of 61 1. Request: To vacate the portion of note #17 on the Southridge Subdivision No. 1 plat that prohibits direct lot or parcel access to S. Spanish Fork Way. Simison: Okay. Now we will open up Item 6-H, a public hearing for Blue Valley Elementary School, H-2020-0023, with staff comments. Allen: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. The first application before you tonight is a request for a vacation. It's actually a modification to a plat note for South Ridge Subdivision No. 1. This site is located on the west side of South Linder Road just south of West Overland Road. The final plat was approved by City Council back in 2008. The applicant proposes to amend Plat Note No. 17 on the recorded plat for South Ridge Subdivision No. 1, which prohibits direct lot or parcel access to South Spanish Fork Way, to allow an exception for Lot 2, Block 2, to have two accesses for the proposed elementary school. The two accesses are proposed to accommodate an ingress-egress for school buses and parent pick-up-drop-off lanes. The proposed change to the plat note would still restrict access to the collector street for other lots in the subdivision. The final plat approved by Council in 2008 did not include a note prohibiting direct lot access to South Spanish Fork Way, a collector street. Note 16 on the plat stated direct lot or access -- excuse me -- direct lot access to South Linder Road and West Overland Road is prohibited. Prior to ACHD signing the plat they required the applicant to modify the note to add a restriction prohibiting direct lot access to South Spanish Fork Way. Even though the city didn't require the restriction, because it is on the plat, the Ada county surveyor requested City Council, along with ACHD, approve the proposed modification prior to removal of the note from the plat. A traffic impact study was submitted to ACHD for review with the request for modification to the plat note. Although ACHD policy does not allow the proposed accesses, staff recommended a modification to policy to allow only one driveway onto Spanish Fork Way 400 feet north of the roundabout. Only the northern access for school buses and staff was approved due to the following reasons. There wasn't sufficient justification in the traffic impact study for two driveways. The southern driveway is proposed to be located on the departing leg of the roundabout and drivers are typically accelerating as they exit and are not prepared to stop. The southern driveway doesn't meet district policy for right-in, right-out only driveways to be offset at least 220 feet from a signalized intersection. And, lastly, the southern driveway doesn't meet district policy for the driveway to be offset 245 feet from the north driveway. The applicant submitted a response to the staff report in agreement with staff's recommended change to the plat note and the single access via South Spanish Fork Way. A revised site plan was submitted depicting the access approved by ACHD as shown. No other written testimony was submitted. Staff is recommending approval of the request as follows: Plat note 17 should read direct lot or parcel access to West Overland Road, South Linder Road and South Spanish Fork Way is prohibited, except for Lot 2, Block 2, consistent with ACHD's action on the matter per their revised site plan. Staff will stand for any questions. Simison: Thank you, Sonya. Council, any questions for staff at this point in time? Okay. Then I will ask the applicant to come -- applicant to please unmute themselves. I assume this is Mr. Russell, but, please, state your name and address for the record, please. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 41 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 15 of 61 Russell: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of Council. My name is Doug Russell. I'm with The Land Group. 462 East Shore Drive in Eagle, Idaho. And I am representing the West Ada School District on this project this evening. I think that Sonya summed things up pretty well and I have nothing further to add, but I would be happy to answer any questions that you might have for me tonight. Simison: Council, any questions for the applicant? Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Thank you, Mr. Russell, for being with us this evening. Does this significantly change the flow of how parents or family members and buses will drop off and pick up students? Russell: Council Member Perreault, we do -- we had originally desired to have a parent egress lane onto Spanish Fork Way. However, ACHD was adamantly opposed to two accesses on Spanish Fork Lane. We do feel that that would have made things work maybe a little more smoothly. That said, the main focus in the site plan is to have parent pick up and drop off separated from the bus lane, which we were able to achieve and so we do feel confident that this -- that this site plan is going to work well. We kind of -- I guess went for the fence and then -- the first go round and ACHD just couldn't come to terms with that due to the close proximity of the roundabout. So, we -- we settled on this site plan. We have ran this by the West Ada School District's busing professionals and they are comfortable with it and so we do feel like it is going to function well without that access. Simison: Thank you. Any additional questions for the applicant? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Mr. Russell, not -- I guess a question that pertains specifically to the project, but maybe just some insight from you. As I understand this school was supposed to be built based upon successful passage of a bond that West Ada was going to run this spring. I understand they have delayed that. Do you know has that impacted any communication they have had with you about delaying the construction of this project and, if so, when do they anticipate building it? Russell: Council Member Cavener, I do not have the exact answer to your question as to when they plan to build the school. I do have some basic information in regards to the bond. My understanding is there was concerns about participation in light of recent current events and so, therefore, that has been postponed. I could not tell you when they are planning to carry that bond forward and start construction on this project, but I can tell Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 42 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 16 of 61 you that they have directed us to continue moving forward with our design and we are -- we are beyond 90 percent completion with construction documents and we plan to wrap these up fairly soon. So, my guess is they are going to put these on the shelf very close at hand and as soon as they feel like they can get this bond passed they will move forward immediately. I do know that this is an important school for the district. Simison: Thank you. Any other questions? Okay. Thank you. This is a public hearing. Chris, did we have -- or, Adrienne, did we have anyone who signed up in advance? Weatherly: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. One person. Shawn Conner. Simison: Okay. Is Mr. Conner with us in the system? I did see Shawn who is an attendee. Johnson: Mr. Mayor, he has permission to speak in the system if he wants. Simison: Yes. While we are getting this put in place, just a reminder that after the staff presents the background information, the applicants have up to 15 minutes. Public testimony. Each person is given up to three minutes to testify and, then, the applicant will have the final comment following all public testimony. And with that we will -- just information for all these public hearings as we move forward. So, no one would like to testify on this item? Is that your confirmation, Chris? Johnson: I just spoke into a muted microphone. My apologies, Mr. Mayor. He is unmuted and able to speak, but I have not gotten a response. Simison: You have not got a response from him yet? Johnson: That is correct. Russell: Mr. Mayor, this is Doug Russell again if I may. If it's Shawn Conner that's on the list, I in no way would want to inhibit him speaking, but I would just like to clarify that he is with my office and working on this project with me, unless he has something he wants to add in the way of a public member, I think as far as representation for West Ada we are okay. That's all I will say on that matter. Simison: Okay. Well, since we have not gotten any response I guess I will turn this over to Council if they feel comfortable with that information about -- if they would like to make a motion. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: I move that we approve the Blue Valley Elementary School application, H- 2020-0023, to vacate the plat note for Southridge Sub No. 1. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 43 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 17 of 61 Nary: You need to close the public hearing first. Perreault: Oh. My apologies. Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: I move that we close the public hearing for Blue Valley Elementary School, H- 2020-0023. Cavener: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Those opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Perreault: Would you like me to try that again? Simison: Absolutely. Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: I move that we approve the -- the application for the vacation of a plat note for South Ridge Sub No. 1 on application 2020-0023 for Blue Valley Elementary School. Cavener: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve Item H-2020-0023. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, clerk will call the roll. Roll call: Bernt, yea; Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, absent; Perreault, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion passes. Thank you very much. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. I. Public Hearing for Idaho Central Credit Union (H-2020-0016) by Idaho Central Credit Union, Located at 3152 W. Peak Cloud Ln. 1. Request: Modification to the Existing Development Agreement for TM Creek Subdivision ( Inst. 2017-113747) to update the conceptual development plan for the site to allow for the development of a financial institution with a drive- through. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 44 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 18 of 61 Simison: With that we will move on to Item 6-I, a public hearing for Idaho Central Credit Union, H-2020-0016. I will open this public hearing with staff comments. Allen: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. The next application before you is a request for a modification to the existing development agreement. This site consists of 2.03 acres of land. It's zoned C-G and located at 3152 West Peak Cloud Lane at the southeast corner of West Franklin Road and South Ten Mile Road. A development agreement exists for this site that has been amended a couple of times previously. The applicant proposes a modification to the existing agreement to update the conceptual development plan for the site to allow for the development of a financial institution with a drive thru for Idaho Central Credit Union. The existing concept plan depicts building footprints for three separate structures on Lots 9 through 11, Block 2, TM Creek Subdivision No. 2. Structures are depicted abutting the adjacent street buffers along Ten Mile and Franklin Roads to the north and west and the drive aisle along the south boundary with parking internal to the site. A single driveway for a drive thru is depicted on the north and west sides of the building at the corner of Franklin and Ten Mile Roads. The applicant intends to combine the three lots into one parcel through a subsequent property boundary adjustment application and construct one 5,672 square foot single story structure with five drive-thru lanes on the north side of the building adjacent to the street buffer along Franklin Road, with an exit driveway along the west side of the building adjacent to the street buffer along Ten Mile Road and parking to the south and east of the structure. The development agreement states that most buildings along South Ten Mile Road should address the street by being built to the street buffer in accord with the Ten Mile interchange specific area plan. This provision is especially important as this site is situated at the corner of two major access thoroughfares, Franklin and Ten Mile Roads, and is highly visible from these roadways. The proposed building is not planned to be built to the street buffer as desired and the five drive-thru lanes will be highly visible from Franklin Road, directly conflicting with the intent of the aforementioned development agreement provision. The development agreement also requires all future development to be consistent with the design elements contained in the Ten Mile plan. The design standards listed in the UDC, 11-3A-19, and the design guidelines in the Meridian design manual, which has been replaced by the architectural standards manual. The following are goals and design elements in the Ten Mile plan that are applicable to the proposed development, along with staff's comments in regard to consistency with these elements. The first traditional neighborhood design concepts with a strong pedestrian oriented focus are essential. The proposed drive thru use and design with five drive-thru lanes is extremely vehicular focused and not pedestrian as desired. Street oriented design is critical in urban environments and especially at a gateway to the Ten Mile area, such as this. Buildings should be at or close to the property line creating a consistent edge to the public space and making streets more friendly and walkable. The proposed structure is separated by five drive-thru lanes on the north side of the building adjacent to Franklin and one driveway on the west side of the building adjacent to Ten Mile. All new commercial buildings should have continuous unbroken frontage along required build to lines to a minimum height of 30 feet or at least 75 percent of the property frontage. The proposed building height is only 22 feet. Most of the existing structures in the overall development so far are built to the frontage. Furthermore, their proposed building and Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 45 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 19 of 61 site design lack any gateway features or enhanced integration with the overall site and district, despite the prominent corner visibility. New buildings at street intersections should hold the corners and avoid additional building setbacks, unless a new public space is specified. The proposed building is set a substantial distance away from the intersection and is separated by major vehicular oriented drive-thru lanes. No public spaces are proposed. At least 40 percent of the linear dimension of the street level frontage shall be in windows or doorways. While the west elevation is consistent with this design element, the north elevation has no windows or doorways. The goal in these areas is to achieve a floor area ratio of one to 1.25 or more. The proposed development has a bar of .06, which is .94 under the minimum desired. In order to achieve this goal and recognizing the site limitations with the Ten Mile Creek, buildings must be multi-story or make heavy use of shared parking areas and with less vehicular oriented design. Multi- story examples at other banks that would be in closer alignment with the FAR goals that exist at the northeast corner of Fairview and Eagle and on the southeast corner of Eagle and Overland. So far this area is not developing consistent with the floor area ratio goal in the plan. Building height should be two to four stories over much of the area, with opportunities for taller buildings in a few locations. Their proposed building is only a single story in height. So far the TM Creek commercial use area has only developed with single story buildings. The future commercial buildings to the east in the TN-C district are required by the development agreement to be a minimum of two stories in height. Four story apartment buildings have been constructed to the east and south within the TM Creek area. Single story structures surrounded by surface parking and drive aisles make it difficult for the plan to ever meet the unique destination elements of the plan that would draw and support broader demographic diversity important to many employers in this area. The following are design elements in the UDC, 11-3A-19, that are applicable to the proposed development. Site design. For lots with frontage on a public street, a minimum of 40 percent of the buildable frontage of the property shall be occupied by building facades and/or public space. Within mixed use areas, such as this, buildings may be placed away from roadways if a minimum of 30 percent of the building frontage is occupied by building facades and/or public space. The building is proposed to be located away from the adjacent roadways. There are no buildings or public space along the frontage of this property. However, there are buildings along the buildable frontage on the larger mixed use designated area. Pedestrian walkways. A continuous internal pedestrian walkway that is a minimum of five feet in width is required to be provided from the perimeter sidewalk to the main building entrance for nonresidential uses. Where the walkway crosses vehicular driving surfaces that is required to be distinguished from the vehicular surface through the use of pavers, colored or scored concrete, or bricks. There is a pedestrian walkway depicted on the site plan from the sidewalk along Ten Mile Road to the main building entrance, but there is not a pedestrian walkway from the north from the sidewalk on Franklin Road. One will be required. During the pre-application meeting staff discussed with the applicant the need for the structure to be built to the street buffer along Ten Mile and Franklin Roads and discussed other site design options. These options consisted of locating the drive thru on the south side of the building or detaching the drive thru from the building and locating it south of the building similar to that of Cap- Ed Credit Union located at the intersection of South Meridian Road and East Overland Road and there is a diagram of an example in your staff report if you would like to Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 46 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 20 of 61 reference it, if you haven't already. The proposed plan is deficient in many of the goals and design concepts and elements in the Ten Mile plan as noted. Due to its location at a major intersection and gateway to the Ten Mile area development of this site consistent with the Ten Mile interchange plan is key. If the proposed concept plan is approved by Council, staff recommends as a provision of the amended development agreement that screening is provided in the street buffers along Ten Mile and Franklin Roads adjacent to the five drive-thru lanes in the form of berms, landscaping, walls, architectural elements or combination of these elements to produce an appropriate buffer adjacent to public spaces and roadways. Concept building elevations for the financial institution were submitted as shown. The design of the structure is required to comply with the design elements in the Ten Mile plan as set forth in the development agreement and with the standards in the architectural standards manual. This review will take place with the middle of the design review application with the certificate of zoning compliance application. A conceptual perspective drawing was submitted for the north side of the building demonstrating how the drive thru area could be screened with vegetated screen walls as shown. Staff is supportive of this concept if the proposed concept plan is approved by Council, but would like to see more landscaping, trees and shrubs, and berming within the street buffers adjacent to the drive thru along with the screen walls. If Council approves the applicant's request for an amendment to the concept plan, staff recommends that berming and additional landscaping, trees and shrubs, with vegetated screen walls are provided in the street buffers adjacent to the drive thru along the north and west boundaries of the site as previously mentioned. Written testimony has been received from Aurora Riopelle, the applicant's representative, in agreement with the staff report. Staff will stand for any questions. Simison: Thanks, Sonya. Council, do you have any questions for staff? Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Real quick question for Sonya. To require additional landscaping are there minimum standards that we have already that to -- to say, okay, you need to do this, how do we -- how do we be specific about, yes, you need additional landscaping? Allen: Councilman Hoaglun, Mr. Mayor, Councilmen, there are no specific requirements specifically like a certain amount of trees per linear frontage, that kind of thing. If you want to approve this with a dense landscape buffer, I would suggest possibly a buffer that results in trees that touch at maturity, similar to landscaping within buffers to -- abutting like commercial uses on residential properties. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, Sonya, thank you. That helps a little bit. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 47 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 21 of 61 Perreault: Sonya, would you help -- help me understand -- it sounds like from your presentation that the application does not meet the site design requirements. There are challenges with pedestrian walkways. There are challenges with it complying with the intended plan for the TM Creek area. It doesn't sound like there was any additional information provided by the applicant that addressed any of those concerns that the staff had specifically. I guess what I'm trying to understand is -- is basically if Council approves the applicant's request we are, essentially, saying that the applicant does not have to comply with all of the concerns that were just pointed out in your presentation? Allen: Mr. Mayor and Council Woman Perreault-- Council Woman Perreault, Councilmen, it would be letting them out of the floor area ratio design elements of the plan and the height. The applicant did come back with the plan that's before you with the screen walls as -- as kind of a mitigation for -- for screening that drive thru from the public street. So, that is one thing they have done. The pedestrian walkway connection from the north is something that we could condition to be provided with the certificate of zoning compliance, but overall the site layout as is is what they are proposing and that's -- that's what's before you tonight for your -- for your decision on. Simison: Are there any additional questions at this time? Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Sonya, on that FAR, the floor area ratio, in the Ten Mile Creek area, is -- is that just for the corners or is that for that whole development? Allen: It's for the entire Ten Mile area, Mr. Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, follow up. Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: In looking -- you know, driving past that regularly is that something that the other buildings have achieved or is -- are they lacking as well? Because as noted other -- other buildings are two story. Allen: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilmen, that--that's the reason that Council is bringing up these issues is that so far we have not received the development that complies with the FAR goals. So, Council really needs to consider in approving this application for this application, as well as future applications, how this is going to affect the Ten Mile area. Simison: Okay. Thank you. With that I will ask the applicant to come forward and I believe -- I'm assuming it's going to be Aurora -- and I will not try to pronounce the last Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 48 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 22 of 61 name, even though it was already stated, but, please, come forward and say your name and address for the record, please. Heazle: Mr. Mayor, this is Mark Heazle with Lombard Conrad Architects. I am a principal at Lombard Conrad. Aurora is one of my staff members. Simison: Okay. Thank you. Heazle: I want to thank you and thank the City Council for -- for reviewing this. My address is 1221 Shoreline Lane, Boise, Idaho. 83702. And I'm representing Idaho Central Credit Union. We also have Dustee Woolstenhulme on the line, who is the representative for Idaho Central Credit Union. So, at any point we would like to hear from the owner we can. I will -- I will start by saying that public safety and pedestrian safety is first and foremost on our minds when it comes to site layout and with a financial institution that does require having lanes -- or traffic lanes. The layout of those lanes is critical. This site is a unique configuration with these three parcels. We are flanked to the east with a irrigation district easement and the -- the parcels that we are consolidating create somewhat of an L shape. So, with these three parcels and the consolidation, laying out of the drive thru as we tried and looked at several different variations of how to put these drive thrus on this site. The issues that we ran into while laying out the drive thru locations were that we --when locating these elsewhere on the site and with the turn-ins off of West Peak Cloud Lane and the adjacent drive to the east, putting these -- these drive thrus on any other location puts pedestrians at risk. What we really want to mitigate here is pedestrian access crossing over drive thru lanes. In Idaho we --we have multiple different variations of vehicles that people drive from, you know, small Priuses to large F-350s and what we do not want to have happen is family members -- a mother and their children crossing over a drive thru lane in order to access the credit union and for somebody fumbling through their wallet or trying to take care of their receipts to pull out and accidentally hit a -- hit a child or -- or a pedestrian. So, when laying out the site we -- we -- reviewing the best safety to the pedestrians was to locate this drive on the north side. We understand that -- that that does put the city in a position to having to -- to reviewing and approving a layout and a concept that deviates from the set standards out here and we are cognizant and Idaho Central Credit Union is cognizant as to the responsibility to the community to provide aesthetically pleasing and long-term institutions. They are not building these financial institutions to last three to four years, they are building these to last 15 to 20 years. So, this is a long term facility that will be out here for hopefully multiple generations. When discussing this with the city prior we -- we discussed the concerns with the layout with the drive thrus being at the intersection of Ten Mile and Franklin Road and one of the suggestions made and one of the suggestions that we thought was -- was a good approach to help screen this was to provide an architectural and landscape screen wall on the north side along Franklin Road. What this does is it -- it helps screen the drive thru traffic on the northernmost ATM lane from vehicle traffic off of Franklin Road. We do not currently have berming shown or additional landscape as -- as was commented on in the revised staff report. We are happy to work with the city to revise frontage landscape to come with -- come up with a compromise and a solution that works for the city. Idaho Central Credit Union wants to be out at this location, wants to be a part of this community Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 49 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 23 of 61 and wants to provide pleasing facilities that are not only safe, but -- but meet the -- meet the requirements of the city. This was our -- the most appropriate solution for this as -- as we saw it. Again having the -- the irrigation easements that would not allow us to build structures over it, including a drive thru lane or a remote drive thru puts us at a hindrance as far as the -- the best and most appropriate layout and location for this credit union. I would also mention that to the south we have Happy Teriyaki and Epic Shine Carwash that also have what I can tell drive thrus along South Ten Mile Road. I believe we are providing a very aesthetically pleasing building out here and we will work with the city to make sure that we are providing adequate berming and adequate landscaping to -- to make sure that this --this meets the city-- the city requirements or come to a compromise on how to meet the city requirements with landscaping. If there is any other questions we can loop Dustee Woolstenhulme in at this time if-- if the Council would like to ask any questions of the architect specifically or the owner specifically. Simison: Thank you, Mark. Council, do you have any questions for the applicant at this time? Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Thank you. So, this is -- I'm familiar with this --with this location. It is a unique -- uniquely shaped property with the three lots and how they are -- how they join together and -- and all the different factor -- geographic -- geographical factors on that site. Mark, first of all, let me say that I think the screens are very nicely done, that they are aesthetically appealing at least from the -- the photos that are on here, the renderings that are on here. Two questions for you. The first would be would the screens extend farther down to the -- to the east to -- to cover potentially your three or four cars that are --that are lined up to go through or is it --they just -- are they just going to stop, you know, essentially, behind what would be the first or second car? And, then, the other question I have is sort of a bigger picture question, which is what -- what is it about this building in this location that would encourage us to -- to basically approve something that -- that doesn't really fit with the plan for this area. What is unique about -- about your building that would encourage us to basically overlook a bunch of requirements that had already been set for the Ten Mile Creek area? Heazle: Thank you for the question. I would address the first question. We in the concept, yes, we do only show that covering primarily just the -- the main drive right there, that -- that 62 feet of ATM area. We can extend that further over to cover more of that eastern section to -- to help screen any incoming vehicles. That might be -- it might be better addressed with berming on that end. We do need to address the fact that the Council has commented on providing landscape berming in here and -- and I think we could have a nice mixture of these screen panels and a mixture of the berming as well. Now, whether that berming happens on the east end or the screen panels extend I would -- I would be fine with either of those options and coming up with a concept to extend that screen wall to the east to -- to mitigate visibility of that traffic, as well as some -- some Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 50 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 24 of 61 additional tall tree areas. Now, as far as the second question goes, what makes this an appealing site? The -- the appealing site would be that this is at the intersection of West Franklin and Ten Mile Road. I think the -- it's been very evident over the past several years that the City of Meridian is growing -- growing very rapidly and with this parcel in this undeveloped site this would be a -- a very nice iconic location for -- at Franklin and Ten Mile for Idaho Central Credit Union to have a very aesthetically pleasing branch. The general material palette that we use on these facilities is a mixture of long lasting metal panel and -- a composite metal panel and brick. This design is -- is primarily a metal panel and -- and brick structure. It is -- you know, the -- if you -- if you look at this compared to an EIFS system this is a 20 to 25 year plus product before it is refinished or needs maintenance. We are using durable, strong materials to establish a presence here. We want to show that this is a financial institution that is going to be here for the long term and we are doing that I believe through the materials and not only through the materials, but also through the -- the entry location. I know it's not presented here -- maybe on the prior slide, but as you can tell we have a very strong open public entrance on that southside off of West Peak Cloud Lane. That does have a very -- a taller volume. So, we do have a mixture of solid wall on the front, but we also have a very nice mixture -- a nice area of open glazing off of South Peak Cloud Lane and it will be very evident from Ten Mile Road with the -- I would say the pitched roof at the main entry. Perreault: Mr. Mayor, a follow up. Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Thank you. I guess maybe my second question wasn't -- wasn't very clear. What I was asking -- obviously, this is a very desirable intersection with as much traffic as comes by this location. I guess what I was asking was is there something unique that Idaho Central is providing to this Ten Mile area that, you know, perhaps -- or have you looked at other-- other sites in -- within the entire development or what -- I guess -- is that -- is my question making sense? It's sort of like I look at this as a trade off. If we are going to allow -- allow you to -- to not meet all these other requirements within the Ten Mile Creek, is there something that's very unique about what you are doing that couldn't go in in a different location? Heazle: I understand -- I think I understand the question. I think this question is better suited for -- for Dustee Woolstenhulme, the owner's representative from Idaho Central Credit Union. The question sounds to be -- sounds to me to be like -- as far as the catchment area and as far as what -- what services is this financial institution providing that no other -- or that isn't present here currently that this community needs and if we are able to -- Sonya -- or I don't know who is controlling -- would we be able to -- to open him up to comment on this? Yes, I can hear you. Woolstenhulme: Statistically two of our Council Members should be members of Idaho Central Credit Union. Nary: He needs to identify himself for the record, please. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 51 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 25 of 61 Woolstenhulme: This is Dustee Woolstenhulme, project manager for Idaho Central Credit Union. Address P.O. Box 2469, Pocatello, Idaho. 83206. Statistically two members of the Council should -- one or two members of the Council should be members of Idaho Central Credit Union. Somewhere between one in four and one -- one in six residents in -- depending on the area of Ada county are members of our credit union. We provide a very essential service to members to our communities. We are a credit union. As a credit union we are one of the best as far as financial institutions go. We are number one in the northwest for our return number. That means that we are better for the people who are members of the credit union than anybody else in the northwest. As a community you want financial institutions like that. We are good for you. We are good for Idaho. We are good for Ada county and we are good to our members. We are -- our -- our mission statement is helping Idaho and helping others achieve financial success. Now, yeah, maybe -- maybe it would be great if this building were seven feet taller or if -- if the drive- ups weren't visible, but this location is highly attractive only because of the visibility. You build a bunch of berms and put trees that touch edge to edge that block the visibility of the building, then, residents of Meridian won't be able to tell that there is a financial institution there to help them. So, those sorts of things -- those sorts of decisions that are very unfriendly to business are very unfriendly to the people who -- who use those businesses. I get -- and I understand the desire to have a very pedestrian friendly community, but-- but we all know that we just came out of six months of winter when folks aren't going to be walking five miles to get to this branch. We also as a credit union we know that in order for a financial institution building to be very successful it needs somewhere between 20 and 25 thousand members to have very easy access and easier the access the more successful for them and for the local branch location. So, all these things that make us hard to see, hard to get to, make it dangerous for our members, for elderly members, for are young mothers having to walk across the drive aisles where vehicles are -- are going through the same area or have to walk around the entire site to get to a sidewalk are unfriendly to -- to business and they are unfriendly to the members and to your residents in your local community. So, yeah, we have made some compromises here. We have tried to do the very best we can. We are good neighbors. We are good for Idaho. Now the other side of that is if you -- you know, if you push and you -- and you really want this to be 30 feet tall or two stories tall, very heavily biased towards sharing parking with -- with one of our neighbors, all of those sorts of things that staff level review push for, will it drive us away? Maybe not. But it -- it just won't be as good for the members and for the residents of the community and that should be the most important thing. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Yes. I have a question probably more for Mark. When we talk about berming -- you talked about screening. There is also possibility of berming. But when we look -- when the site plan -- and I don't know, Sonya, if you can get back to that or whoever was controlling that to -- to -- to the layout, the site plan, it's -- we see these -- these lines on the map and we can't even -- you know, we don't even know the distances that are from Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 52 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 26 of 61 the drive -- last drive lane to the sidewalk. So, if we say, yeah, we want berming, we think you ought to include berming, no idea what that would look like. I mean is that a four foot berm, is it a six foot berm, is it an 18 inch berm? What -- as someone who looks at the site plans and can -- has the knowledge base to say, yeah, we can do berming with these screens, but the maximum height would be X, what -- what would that be? What fits that site that makes it look nice that -- as Dustee said doesn't -- doesn't obliterate the view of your building, but at the same time it's going to be a nice quality look to the outside, just seeing cars stacked in a queue. So, can you give me some idea what type of berm would work in that area, if any? Heazle: Well, I would have to work with our landscape architect and make sure that we are not exceeding a slope for -- slope for any of the bermed up areas that would require a retaining wall or a small retaining wall, but I would assume that we could --we could put a three to four foot berm up there. Now, a three to four foot berm with some vegetation included over the top of that would -- you know, it would -- it would increase the size of that vegetation, so we -- we would end up with a taller blocking screen area, but based on the distances there I would say three feet is a comfortable -- is a comfortable height. Hoaglun: Okay. Thank you. Heazle: We can -- and we can come up with exhibits -- we will come up with exhibits to provide -- provide to the city to make sure that -- that we are -- exhibits including not only an updated landscape plan showing any berming needed by the city, but also, you know, renderings like we have provided that will give you an accurate depiction of what our intent is. Hoaglun: Okay. Thank you for that. Heazle: Yes, sir. Simison: Council, any additional questions for the applicant at this time? Okay. Thank you. We will move on to public testimony then. Chris or Adrienne, did we have anybody from the public who signed up to testify? Weatherly: Mr. Mayor, we did have just Dustee and Aurora signed up prior to the hearing to testify, but no other citizens were signed in. Simison: Okay. Well, if there is anybody that would like to provide comment on this application I encourage you to raise your hand at this point in time. And not seeing anybody raise their hand, I guess I will ask the applicant if they would like to provide any additional last words to the Council? Heazle: No. No, sir. Not at this time. Simison: Okay. So, go back to questions like to Councilman Borton. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 53 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 27 of 61 Borton: Mr. Mayor, thank you. I didn't know if there would be public providing some questions or not, but in following up I think Council Woman Perreault was focused on the right question regarding the Ten Mile specific area plan and the staff report of April 14th on the second page has seven bullet points, each identifying specific components of that plan and none of which are met by this design. So, in preparation for the hearing it looked as though Idaho Central Credit Union, which is a fantastic community partner, is an exceptional round peg and our long term plan at Ten Mile is a wonderful square hole and with that mindset I hadn't heard how you address those specific -- those seven specific bullet points in the staff report that are admittedly not addressed with what's presented. Again, a wonderful looking project, but it just misses on so many elements that -- that we just still haven't heard why each of those seven should be ignored for the greater good. Heazle: Would you -- would you like me to comment on those? Borton: Sure. I -- Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: You know, I hear a lot of great remarks about this project and it sounded like staff had tried to steer this application to be compliant with the Ten Mile interchange specific area plan and that is our goal and we comply with our plan and we hold ourselves and our applicants accountable to it or we just don't have a plan at all and if-- if this application is trying to send a message that, really, the plan almost as a whole it just shouldn't apply at all, that's what I hear this application stating, because it requires overlooking so many different components of it in order for it to get approved and it's a wonderful looking building and it's a wonderful community partner, but back to my round peg square hole, can't -- and I wanted to give you the opportunity to try and articulate specifics on why those seven points shouldn't apply here. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Let's see if Mark has -- if you would like to address those first. Heazle: Yes, Mr. Mayor. So, we -- we had a couple of workshop sessions with the City of Meridian to review the noncompliance and the primary concern in reviewing with the City of Meridian during these workshops was the frontage -- the frontage and the screen wall. One of the recommendations was to -- to review what was done at Connections Credit Union just north of Ten Mile -- or just north of this -- this site along Ten Mile and to see how they screened their drive thru that faces the main roadway and through those workshops I was under the impression -- and the renderings hadn't changed from the initial workshop up until now, with the exception of the screen panels. I was under the perception that the -- the primary focus and the primary concern was the screening of the drive thru on the north side. That was our primary focus was to come up with a solution to screen that drive and to -- and, basically, not impose additional costs to increase the overall building height to a two to four story facility. If that is required for the city to -- to develop here, that's -- that's something that we will have to address with the owner and Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 54 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 28 of 61 get their sign off as -- as that's a much -- much larger cost impact than berming and -- and screen along the north and west side. Hoaglun: Council Woman Perreault, did you have some questions or comments? Perreault: First I wanted to say that I -- I agree with Councilman Borton and he stated the question much more -- much clearer than I did and, basically, that was the point I was trying to get at. But I also wanted to say that one of the things that we consistently heard through our Comprehensive Plan update was that there is a desire from the public for us to stick to the plans that we make and that go through very long -- lots of input from citizens, which is the same process that was gone through when this plan was put together for Ten Mile. So, it is -- it is about this particular location. It is about this particular application, but it's also about a bigger picture element for us as decision makers that our citizens have been very clear that they want us to stick to the plans that we create. So, just wanted to give the applicant that context for why we are -- we are honing in on these kinds of questions specifically. Heazle: So, is the -- I guess what I'm hearing is that the -- the staff recommendation to City Council is contingent on the screen wall. It is not. The staff recommendation for approval is not only contingent on the screen wall, but would be contingent on meeting the seven other -- or six other requirements, including the overall building height and -- and story -- minimum story requirements. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: That's a --that's a fair question. I looked at the top of page four of the staff report in preparation. It talks about that more holistic concern that I saw staff raise about the multitude of-- of elements in that Ten Mile plan, which just aren't being met. It speaks to the screening specifically, you are correct, but I didn't think that eliminated what staff had identified as the broader concern. At least that staff had noted. Simison: So, to the point that's been made -- and I guess I would ask the -- the staff if they feel like they can make -- answer this. Is there a point--and I'm just looking at what's already there. You know, I have heard the conversation, you know, and it's much -- kind of like -- I almost feel like it's right downtown, you know, where we -- or our urban renewal district where you come off the interstate and you got a lot of transit oriented businesses right there and that's what seems to be going in or already been developed in this area. Does it make sense in any way to carve out a portion of the existing plan? Is there that line that would make sense because of what's already been approved? I'm just asking the question. I mean my big concern is kind of to what the applicant has said, they are building a long term building for 50, 75 years and is this the building --the type of building that you would envision as being an important part of our community in this location in this manner for the next 50 to 75 years with or without the changes to the plan from that standpoint and so I did hear a little bit of a conversation where other parts are -- have Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 55 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 29 of 61 these same DA-- or have DA restrictions on them, but it sounds like this area does not, so I don't know if this is a Bill, Sonya, Caleb, if he's on -- thoughts. Allen: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, I'm not sure if Bill or Caleb is on, but this site, as well as all of the sites in this Ten Mile Creek area and the overall Ten Mile plan, they are tied through their development agreements to be consistent with the Ten Mile plan design elements and goals, as well as the architectural standards manual. This corner is very prominent, as I said, and it is -- it is very important -- as a cornerstone to this development. If this is approved, you know, it will further affect probably future applications down the line and, as you said, this is going to be a long term building and it is a very nice structure, but is it the -- is it the correct location for it to be here? You know, that -- that's what the Council needs to determine tonight. I think I did hear the applicant say that they could go up I believe to two stories if -- if pressed, if they had to, and I think that would be a huge, you know, avenue towards combined with some of the Ten Mile design -- Heazle: So, my -- I apologize. This is -- this is Mark Heazle. Am I still unmuted? Simison: We can hear you. Heazle: Okay. I would like to point out again -- I mentioned this earlier, but with the Happy Teriyaki and Epic Shine Carwash and Einstein's Oilery, is -- is this particular site unique or different than the developed sites I just mentioned in that they are -- I mean I don't believe the Epic Shine Carwash is a two story building. I don't believe Happy Teriyaki is either or -- or Einstein's Oilery just off of Franklin Road two parcels over. So, I guess my -- my question would be is Idaho Central being held to a different standard than the already developed sites in this area? Allen: Mr. Mayor, if I may respond. Simison: Yes. Allen: Mr. Mayor, Council, it is different in that it is located at the corner at the gateway to the Ten Mile area. Franklin and Ten Mile Roads -- that intersection on this corner, as well as across the street to the west are the gateway corridors into this development. So, yes, it is different than the other ones. However, they are all still in the same plan and -- and they are all subject to these design elements, but this one is -- is very important where it's located. Nary: And Mr. Mayor? Simison: Mr. Nary. Nary: Mr. Mayor, what I can add to -- when we discussed this with staff last week it was my suggestion to Sonya to make clear where we are deviating from the plan significantly, because, again, the Council has the ability to choose to do that if you wish, but you need Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 56 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 30 of 61 to know that you are choosing to do that and I think where we were concerned from the staff level is because this is such a prominent structure in a prominent location, that it will more likely than not set the stage for other applications that come in this area in -- and -- and, again, I don't think it's holding them to a different standard, it's holding them to the standard that's in the plan and, then, the DA that already exists. So, it's not new. What -- what other ones may have gotten approved is really not the point. The Council needs to be aware that we do have plans and they did take a lot of community involvement to get there and you at least need to be aware of the consequences, because of the impacts it can have on future requests. Woolstenhulme: Mark? Mark, this Dustee. Were you clearly made aware that you were deficient in seven areas of your design, especially the height? Heazle: The areas of design, yes, we were deficient. All new commercial designs should have a continuous unbroken frontage. We deviate from that with our drive thru on the north with the punched openings, because we do have a drive thru on the north. What I understood during our workshop sessions was that the -- the screen wall was the -- the major element that would --would help -- help be a compromise as far as a deviation from these -- these seven items that -- by providing additional screening, by putting additional costs into our frontage that that would assist or be a compromise in meeting the city's -- city's requirements and getting through the process. Woolstenhulme: The -- you know, the sidewalk thing is a non-issue. We can fix that easily; right? Heazle: Correct. Woolstenhulme: But were you -- were you aware that -- that the building was drastically undersized for the site and should have been taller -- maybe even two stories and should have been heavily dependent, as staff said, on a shared parking agreement? Heazle: No, that was not made -- that was not made -- was not a major concern to get through this process. The major concern was, again, that the -- the screening. The -- based upon the staff recommendation and, you know, if we -- if we -- if the staff did not recommend approval we would have had more conversations as to how to meet the height requirement, but with the current design and with the discussions of the current design with staff, we felt that the primary concern was the frontage screening and that the other seven items were -- were minor items based upon the design that we presented, with the fact that we provide long lasting materials, high durable materials, in our view a very aesthetically pleasing building that does set a good stage for this intersection. That the -- that the -- after discussing that with staff it was recommended that just by providing the screen walls on the other side that we would be able to work through this process with the city and that that was the -- the -- the one item that would help -- help -- help the city and ICCU come to an agreement on how to move forward by providing an aesthetically pleasing frontage on those two sides with additional landscaping. The height requirement was -- was minor from what I was made aware of. But if there is -- you know, if there is Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 57 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 31 of 61 -- this is the venue to discuss this again -- and I guess at this point we are open to recommendations or criteria to discuss with the owner -- recommendations from the city to discuss with the owner on how to meet the requirements. Simison: So, Council, I mean the way I'm going to try to maybe help frame this and -- for you all and maybe you are already there, but I do think that you are at a turning point in this area where currently you have an area that you go, you drive your car to get your oil changed, spill it up, and get money on your way out without ever leaving your car. If -- but with it -- knowing that this is not the last application that will come through in this area, do you want to get back to adherence to the plan moving forward or not? And I think if -- if you are looking to deviate from these seven areas, I do think you need to -- we need to open this back up for consideration about which direction we are going to go. That's going to be my recommendation. You all can take it or leave it from -- from that standpoint, but I assume the applicant was made aware that there was a specific area plan. They had access to read that plan. They knew the requirements of the plan and they moved forward despite what conversations may or may not have, then, occurred with staff, that they were aware of what they were developing into from that standpoint or should have been made aware. So, it's really whether or not you want to hold them to what standard moving forward. Are there any further questions? Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, a question, but perhaps with a comment. You know, every -- every site is not perfect to fit what the applicant may want to do and they have to do mitigations and we have to do some work like screenings on the north and west and how do we make that acceptable, but I think it's been pointed out by Council members that there is -- there is a lot of deviations or -- or not complying with hardly any of the standards that are set for this area and it does bother me that there are other businesses there already that didn't meet the standards to one degree or another. I think it's a matter for this particular project and, again, it goes back to the particular site, looking at the flow, understand, okay, the drive has to be for safety reasons that were worked out on the north side. Okay. So, how do we mitigate that. But being that this corner is a statement corner, what other mitigations could be put into place to enhance this project and this building and that's something I would like to see and I don't like designing on the fly, because, A, I'm not a designer and, B, it just doesn't turn out too well. I would prefer that we delay this application, move it a couple weeks to hear it again and maybe have the applicant come back and see if they can mitigate reasonably and, then, we could consider -- consider that. We have given consideration to other projects before because they don't meet every single item and it might be that they come back and they don't meet enough in our eyes, but I would like to give them that opportunity to see what more -- more could be done. But I'm open to suggestions on that. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I would agree with Council Member Hoaglun. ICCU is a great partner in the community. They always have been. Always will be. I really want this project to happen. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 58 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 32 of 61 If there are certain things that we need to give guidance to ICCU, if we choose to continue or to -- or to put -- you know, move this project out so they can, you know, do a redesign or talk about different things they can mitigate. What are those two or three things -- or points of reference that we can help guide ICCU in doing? Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: I just want to say that -- so, full disclosure, I am a member of the ICCU and this would be near my home. It would be wonderful. But for me this isn't about who -- who is applying, whether it's ICCU or a different bank or a different company, this would be personally highly beneficial to be located there for me and my family. For me it's about what -- what's a standard that we are setting if we choose to overlook the multiplicity of -- of items that is in our plan and -- and not require the applicant to comply by them. It really doesn't matter who the applicant is, for me it's about the standard that we are setting and for any of the applications moving forward. I wish I could -- could speak to the decisions that were made from the past, the past approvals. I can't. I wasn't on the Council at that time. But I can say that we have had --just, like I said, we have had a lot of -- a lot of communication with the public, who was wanting us to follow the plans that we have set forward for these different areas specifically. So, I just wanted to say that this -- for me this is not about Idaho Central Credit Union, that I would be looking at this just as critically if it was about any applicant. I don't want to -- I don't want them to feel like they are being singled out. Simison: Council, anyone else like to provide some feedback to Councilman Bernt's comments about what issues you would like to see addressed, if any? Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Borton. Borton: I think Councilman Hoaglun's suggestion is a good one. Provides that opportunity to address the questions that Councilman Bernt's asking and I think the starting point are those found in the staff report of April 14. In particular I mean the plan as a whole identifies the components that are required for development within its boundaries, so that gives the direction. But specific to this one we have a short list that staff has compiled that would be a really good starting spot. Simison: Okay. And with that in mind -- I guess I would ask staff and the applicant is there a specific time frame that would make sense to bring this back before I ask Council for a motion? Is it two weeks? Is it three weeks? Allen: Mr. Mayor, if I may respond. Staff would need revised plans at least ten days prior to the hearing date that they select, so they should probably consider that in their request. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 59 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 33 of 61 Simison: So, more likely closer to minimum of three weeks, if not a month, is what I just heard. Mark, do you have any suggestions on what you are hearing and the time frame? Heazle: We will hit the -- whatever time frame is established. So, if you -- if we can hit a three week time frame we will and meet the city requirements. Borton: Mr. Mayor, that would be the May 5th. Simison: Thank you. I was trying to get to a calendar. Okay. Parsons: Mr. Mayor? This is Bill. I would like to point out to the applicant and even the Council that the Planning and Zoning Commission we also are processing that--we have processed the conditional use permit for ICCU to have that taken up by the Commission at next week's P&Z hearing. So, it also asks if the applicant request continuance of that project, because they need to get the DA in place before they can move forward on that conditional use permit application. Simison: Okay. Chris or Adrienne, how does the -- the May 5th pose any problems with what's already put on there or not? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, there is only one public hearing on May 5th regarding land use and a budget amendment from Community Development. So, you are wide open. Simison: Okay. May 5 seems to be a good date. Heazle: Yes, sir. Simison: With that do I have any motions -- a motion? Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Unless Mr. Bernt wants to go forward, I can give this a try. I would move that we continue the public hearing for Idaho Central Credit Union, H-2020-0016, to May 5th -- was that the right date? May 5th. And that they also request continuance of their conditional use hearing at the Planning and Zoning level in conjunction with this move of their public hearing at the Council level. Perreault: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 60 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 34 of 61 Simison: With that I'm going to ask Council real quick, does -- do we need a recess or would you like to continue -- okay. Let's go ahead and take a ten minute recess and we will reconvene at 8:00 p.m. (Recess: 7:49 p.m. to 8:01 p.m.) J. Public Hearing for Bannock Ridge (H-2019-0143) by Ryan Recta, Located at 2940 S. Mesa Way 1. Request: Development Agreement Modification to remove the subject 4.26 acre property from the boundary of the existing agreement (Bannock Ridge - Inst. # 2017-084176) for the purpose of entering into a new agreement consistent with the proposed development plan; and, 2. Request: A Preliminary Plat consisting of 10 building lots and 5 common lots on 4.26 acres of land in the R-4 zoning district. Simison: All right. So, since we are all back we will go ahead and call the meeting back into order. The next item on our agenda is Item 6-J, public hearing for Bannock Ridge, H-2019-0143. Open this public hearing was staff comments. Allen: -- request for a development agreement modification and a preliminary plat. This site consists of 4.35 acres of land. It's zoned R-4 and is located at 2940 South Mesa Way. This property was previously platted as Lot 3, Block 2, Kachina Estates Subdivision. It was annexed back in 2017 as part of a larger 13.58 acre parcel also called Bannock Ridge and is governed by a development agreement approved with that project. The Comprehensive Plan future land use map designation is low density residential, which calls for three or fewer units per acre. Development agreement modification is requested to remove the subject 4.35 acre property from the 13.58 acre boundary of the existing agreement for the purpose of entering into a new agreement consistent with the proposed development plan. A new preliminary plat is proposed consisting of ten building lots and five common lots on 4.35 acres of land in the R-4 zoning district for the construction of single family residential detached homes. There is an existing home and accessory structures that are proposed to remain on a lot in the proposed subdivision. The southern most accessory structure on Lot 10, Block 1, that has a purple star on it, does not comply with the minimum 15 foot rear setback. The plat will need to be revised to comply or the structure will need to be removed. Access is proposed via South Mesa Way at the east boundary and via the extension of an existing stub street, East Loggers Pass Street at the west boundary of the site, which is proposed to stub to the south boundary of the subdivision for future extension. Those accesses are noted with -- with the red arrows. A ten foot wide segment of the city's multi-use pathway system is proposed along the frontage of this site adjacent to South Mesa Way, extending along the southern boundary to the northwest corner of the site for connection to the existing pathway in Glacier Springs Subdivision to the west along the Ten Mile Creek in accord with the pathways master plan. There is a short segment, approximately ten feet of the pathway in Glacier Springs Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 61 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 35 of 61 Subdivision at the northwest corner of the site that didn't get constructed with that development, leaving a gap in the pathway system. The current development agreement contains a provision for the missing section to be completed with this development if approval can be obtained from the Glacier Springs homeowners association. Staff is recommending that this provision is carried over into the new development agreement. Because the area of the proposed plat is below five acres in size, the qualified open space and site amenity standards listed in the UDC do not apply. However, common area is proposed for a segment of the city's regional pathway system is planned through the subdivision and where the Ten Mile Creek is located, totaling 11 percent of common open space. Conceptual building elevations were submitted for future homes within this development. Homes depicted are a single story and a single story with a bonus room over the garage with a variety and mix of finish materials, consisting of horizontal and vertical siding and stucco with stone and brick veneer accents. Two story homes aren't shown, but may also be constructed. The Commission recommended approval of this application. I will just go through a summary of the Commission public hearing. Dan Lardie from Leavitt and Associates, the applicant's representative, testified in favor, along with Ryan Recla. No one testified in opposition. The following folks commented. Aneke Binford. Matt Binford. Celeste Blackburn. And Jamie Clawson. Written testimony was received from Dan Lardie, Leavitt and Associates, the applicant's representative, in agreement with the staff report. Key issues of public testimony were as follows: Concern from the homeowners to the south, the Binfords, pertaining to the lack of substantial buffering between the public walk path and the full length of their property and the impact on their ability effectively -- to effectively irrigate their land. They request a good neighbor fence and a more substantial vegetative buffer along the pathway to clearly distinguish the private from public space and to discourage trespassing and protect their privacy and a berm along their property to allow them to continue to effectively flood irrigate their property. Preference for the multi-use pathway to follow the creek consistent with the pathway and adjacent developments rather than jog through the proposed neighborhood. Concern that the proposed development isn't consistent with the existing CC&Rs for the subdivision for Kachina Estates. Complaint pertaining to the neighborhood meeting, i.e., the time of day it was held when nobody could attend and that it was held in a place where there wasn't much room in a pub restaurant. They didn't provide a space for them to meet as they thought no one would show up. Concern that the proposed homes in the development won't be compatible with existing homes in the area. Key issues of discussion by the Commission were as follows: The new preliminary plat won't trigger minimum qualified open space and site amenity standards, since the site is below five acres in size, whereas the existing plat does. They would prefer more open spaces provided. Preference for three -- the three original parcels to develop together as currently platted, rather than splitting this one and possibly others off into individual developments and, again, its effect it would have on the overall common area and site amenities or lack thereof and preference for a berm, fence, and landscaping to be constructed by the developer along the southern boundary adjacent to the Binford property and preference for Lot 2, Block 2, to be a common area lot, rather than a buildable lot for a future retention pond space. The Commission made the changes to the staff recommendation as follows: They added a development agreement provision requiring the developer to construct a berm no less than 18 inches tall along the southern Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 62 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 36 of 61 boundary of the development with fencing on both sides of the pathway and landscaping between the pathway and the fence. The applicant was requested to work with the adjacent property owners, the Binfords, on an agreed -- agreeable berm height and placement and enhanced landscaping prior to the Council meeting tonight for presentation and, lastly, they added a condition requiring Lot 2, Block 2, to be converted from a buildable to a common area lot. Outstanding issues for Council tonight is resolution of the landscaping and fencing along the southern boundary of the site adjacent to the Binford property. A revised landscape plan was submitted as shown that depicts twice as many trees as originally proposed along the southern boundary of the pathway. The applicant should address the perimeter fencing as proposed and, if so, what type and height and whether a berm is proposed or not and, if so, how tall and whether or not it's necessary for it to encroach on the Binford's property. There has been no written testimony received since the commission hearing. Staff will stand for any questions. Simison: Thank you. Thank you, Sonya. Are there any questions at this point in time from Council? Okay. At this point in time I would ask the applicant to come forward. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Before we start with the application or the applicant's testimony, I just -- I thought it was important to disclose -- I live in the Glacier Springs homeowners association that's adjacent to this project. I haven't attended any of the Planning and Zoning Commission meetings, didn't attend the neighborhood meeting. I have -- I have kept more than an arm's length away from this process and while I'm not directly affected -- not within 300 feet, I just thought it was important to disclose that before we go through this process. Simison: Thank you, Councilman. Lardie: Good evening, Mayor, Council Members. Dan Lardie. Leavitt and Associates. 1324 1st Street South, Nampa. 83651. So, I want to say thank you for staff -- or thank you to staff. Do I have my PowerPoint? Is it -- is it available? Johnson: I'm getting that for you right now. My apologies. Lardie: All right. I have it in front of me, but I don't know -- it might -- it might be useful for Council to see it. So, while we wait, just want to let you know that we have -- we do agree with the staff report and that we have proposed a couple of different options for the berm, along with -- for our neighbors to the south. I'm not having control of the slides. Am I missing it? Johnson: You will just have to tell me when you want to go to the next slide. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 63 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 37 of 61 Lardie: Oh, fine. Next slide, please. So, we have -- we have had some brief conversations with the Binfords to the south and we have proposed a couple of different options. We are in agreement with the 18 inch berm, which puts it all on our property that was stated in the staff report. The -- the next slide, please. So, we have proposed the berm one option. It provides a little bit of irrigation control, a little bit -- at least a little bit more irrigation control for -- for the Binfords. Height I think is an issue with -- with them. The -- it also encroaches onto their property by about four and a half foot. Again, the 18 inch berm, we will put it all on our property, but if they -- if they would like a taller berm, then, we would need to probably work with them to try and gain some slope easement on their property. Next slide, please. So, berm two. It seemed like the conversation that I had with the Binfords that berm option two was more -- more what they were looking for. It provides them a bit more privacy and a little bit more separation from people looking over and trying to -- to go along -- or look -- or encroach onto their property or trespass onto their-- onto their property. This -- this would require some -- a slope easement from -- from the Binfords of about nine feet. The height of this berm is three foot from existing ground. We put the fence at the top of the berm and, then, we slope down at three to one until we hit our pathway, which puts the pathway just a little bit lower than the height of the berm and it also allows -- would provide a bit more privacy. Next slide, please. So, just --just a quick note. Their property is -- the -- the back of their home is about 160 feet from the -- from the rear corner to -- to where the fence is proposed on there. It doesn't seem like a lot in -- in their realm. You know, they live on a five acre piece of property. In a subdivision, though, 160 feet, that's -- you know, it's half-- about a half of a football field, again, which is the reason why we are trying to help them with the berm and to come in to -- and to try and help shield them from the pathway. Next slide, please. So, this is just a blow up. It looks like Sonya had these in her proposal about the turnaround on ACHD proposed at the end of Loggers Pass and with that I -- I look forward to your approval. I think it's a nice addition. I think we have tried to work with the Binfords and I believe probably the Binfords are here this evening and that's -- that's great. We look forward to their input and I will stand for any questions. Simison: Council, any questions for the applicant at this time? All right. Thank you very much. Chris or Adrienne, do we have anyone signed up in advance? Weatherly: Mr. Mayor, we do have four people signed in. The first of which -- actually, we do have an HOA representative here, Annette Alonzo, for the Southern Rim Coalition. Simison: Okay. Are they on the line or -- Johnson: Mr. Mayor, I do not see her on the call. Weatherly: Okay. Aneke Binford. Simison: If you could state your name and address for the record, please. A.Binford: Yes. Can you hear me? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 64 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 38 of 61 Simison: Hear you great. A.Binford: Great. Aneke Binford. 3101 Mesa Way, Meridian. Good evening. My husband and I own the property to the south that -- that we have been looking at on the -- on the slide and we are south of the proposed subdivision. We did express concerns to Planning and Zoning regarding the public walking path, which will run the full length of our property. We are concerned mostly about a loss of privacy and an increased risk of trespassing. We also did express the concerns about the impact this development will have on our ability to effectively flood irrigate our land. The City of Meridian pathways master plan states that the city should be sensitive to private owners when trails are proposed adjacent to private property. The city also acknowledges in the master plan that pathway safety is, quote, a major concern of both pathway users and those whose property is adjacent to a pathway. According to the plan one of the city's recommended improvements to address privacy of adjacent owners is the use of good neighbor fencing and the planting of landscape buffers. Also to address trespassing concerns is to clearly distinguish public pathways from private property with vegetated buffers and the use of good neighbor fencing. The existing fence will not discourage trespassing. You can see in some of these slides I have pictures of the fencing. Much of it is pole fencing that is easily slipped through and much of it is being held together with wire and twine. Planning and Zoning did recommend that the developer provide fencing and enhanced landscaping to address privacy and safety concerns. They also recommended the berm to allow us to fully irrigate while still controlling our water. Right now we are able to run our irrigation water long enough to fully saturate our high spots, but some of the water does run off into the adjacent neighbor's pasture, which has never been a problem, but that will become a problem when that pasture becomes a walking path. We feel it's the developer's responsibility to mitigate impact to our ability to effectively and responsibly irrigate our land, as well as to provide privacy and trespassing mitigation. We have been in communication with the developer and his party about the landscaping plan. However, we did not see that the fence was graphically depicted on the plan and we didn't see any enhanced landscaping for a buffer as recommended by Planning and Zoning. We -- we have been in communication regarding the height of the berm and the 18 inch berm will not provide a sufficient buffer to control our water. We talked about the three foot berm and, yes, we will allow that to come onto our property. We understand, you know, that -- that they are saying that the -- with the 18 inch berm they just don't know have room, you know, really to -- with their setbacks on that walking path. So, we did offer to allow the slope to come onto our property to achieve our goal. However, we would prefer not to have to give up a portion of our land just so we can continue to use it productively. We want to ensure that the following is made a provision of the development agreement, that the three foot berm run the full length of our property with enhanced landscaping, not just to that stub road. We need it to go beyond. We would like to have that good neighbor fencing and for it to be wrought iron, not chain link, running the full length of the property, not just to that road. It needs to go to the very end of our property and we would like to be able to sign -- to sign off that all this work was completed prior to issuance of building permits. During Planning and Zoning one of the commissioners noted that it is the developer who is creating the changes that's going to most affect our property, so it should be the developer's responsibility and we agree. We feel it's not unreasonable to request Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 65 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 39 of 61 these conditions to mitigate the impact that this development creates on the usability, safety, and livability of our property and we did put some pictures in there. I think there is three pictures of the fencing -- the existing fencing that on their landscape plan it shows the existing fence to remain. I don't know if I can move these. If I'm controlling them. Johnson: You are not. I'm moving through them for you. A.Binford: Okay. And, then, there is two or--two or three other photos. So, when Glacier Springs went in on our-- to the -- let's see. That would be to the west of us -- on our west border. So, right there, that picture is bordering Cabella Creek. That is the landscaping berm that the developer put in to mitigate the lights from a new road. The new road would put lights right into our house and so in that case the developer provided that landscape berm and, then, there is a photo -- that's -- that's the same landscape berm against Cabella Creek. And, then, I think one of the very -- so, that photo -- that's on Glacier Springs there on -- to the west -- our west border and you can't really see it very closely there, but that developer did put in a landscape berm and perma bark, full landscaping and a full fence. There you go. Along that whole border of our property. And those -- those were our concerns that we brought up to Planning and Zoning and to the city and, you know, we would -- we would really like it if something similar was, you know, to come out of this for us as well. And that's all I have. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions? All right. Appreciate it. A.Binford: Thank you. Weatherly: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Yes, Adrienne. Weatherly: Next on the list is Matt Binford. Simison: If you could state your name and address for the record. Binford: Yeah. It's Matt Binford. 3101 Mesa Way. My wife did a great job describing what we are after. My-- my main concern is our irrigation and if you can pull up the picture on the -- where the road -- actually, the initial project where -- where they planned on ending the berm and the fence. Yeah. So, all our irrigation -- if you look to the left of that, which is the -- what is that, the west, south or north -- north corner of our property boundary, that's where all the water congregates. So, what we are asking is that that berm when -- and fence, that it would extend beyond what they are showing as their proposal and if they don't we are just going to flood the crap out of them. So, I don't know how else to ask for this, but that berm and fence needs to really extend all the way to Glacier Bay, which is the -- what is that? The -- the west side of that diagram. So, I don't know how else we can flood irrigate unless they propose that fence and burn to extend beyond and that if they don't we are just going to flood that -- you know, that road and that -- that drainage ditch with our flood irrigation. And the -- the other concern I have is Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 66 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 40 of 61 basically where that ends up in that corner to the -- to the left of the red is we have a drain field that was put in by Glacier Bay that runs over to Ten Mile Creek and my neighbor and myself -- our flood irrigation all leads to that ditch. So, during construction I'm kind of worried that that might be compromised during the construction phase. So, anyway, I don't -- I don't know that -- that leads to a few questions for the City Council or for the developer, but those are our concerns. Simison: Okay. Thank you. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council -- Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Mr. Binford, I don't know if you are still on the line I guess. I do have a question for you. Binford: Yeah. Cavener: So, if I'm hearing you correctly, you are -- obviously you flood your whole property. The concern you are sharing is not only the potential for water from your flood irrigating to impact the potential homeowners, but to flood that street as well; is that correct? Binford: That's -- that's correct. Because that's -- where that street is is the -- the low spot in our irrigation. Cavener: Right. Binford: And so everything funnels down to that point. Cavener: Okay. Binford: Yeah. Cavener: Thank you. Simison: Council, other questions? All right. Thank you, Mr. Binford. Binford: Thank you. Weatherly: Excuse me, Mr. Mayor. I'm sorry. The last on the list is Ryan Recla. Johnson: Mr. Mayor, I'm attempting to unmute Mr. Recla and it comes up that I cannot unmute him, because he is an older -- on an older version of Zoom. Simison: Chris, can you unmute everybody instead of just one? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 67 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 41 of 61 Johnson: I was able to promote him to panelist, which I believe is allowing him to speak as soon as he comes back in. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, just for clarification, too, either for you or Chris or Adrienne, I think Adrienne said that there was one other person, at least at the start of the public hearing, that was signed up to testify and we couldn't hear them either. Just that we get a chance to maybe circle back and make sure they testified before we wrap things up. Simison: Yeah. Councilman Cavener, I do not show them as being on the call, so they probably signed up in advance and did not make -- did not come into the call, but we will still ask for anybody else. Johnson: Mr. Mayor, Mr. Recla is with us now. Simison: Okay. If you would, please, state your name and address for the record, please. Mr. Recla, we can't hear you if you are speaking. Johnson: It appears there is no audio. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Mr. Bernt. Bernt: Would it be appropriate for Ryan to call in just on a cell phone -- you know, on a cell phone to us on a -- on a landline maybe, instead of using the Zoom option? If he can hear us. Simison: Chris, can you -- Johnson: Yeah. Mr. Mayor, yes, I will put that up on the screen for him to call -- I just received that same message from Jared Day in IT, recommending that, so I'm just getting to that now. Mr. Recla, if you can see the screen -- it's getting there now. That is the number to call, area code 669, and you will enter that nine digit ID. Simison: While he is hopefully calling in, if there is anybody else who would love to testify on this application if you can raise your hand and let us know, that way we can get you set up to be the next speaker. Johnson: It looks like we have Mr. Recla and he will need to press star nine on his phone in order for me to recognize and unmute him. And there you are, sir. Recla: Hello. Bernt: There we go. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 68 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 42 of 61 Recla: Yeah. I got kicked off the Zoom side. I had to call in, but that's all right. You know, actually, I didn't really want to speak. I wasn't planning on speaking, I just wanted to be available to if I had any issues with what was going on. But I have missed the last five minutes of it, so I'm not actually really even sure what's going on. But I -- I am faithful that Dan Lardie has taken care of it for me. Simison: Mr. Recla, we were waiting for you. If you could just state your name and address for the record, so we can -- Recla: Oh. Sorry about that. Yeah. My -- my name is Ryan Recla. My address is 4123 West Garnett Street, Boise, Idaho. 83703. Simison: Council, any questions for Mr. Recla? Okay. Thank you very much. Recla: Sorry about that. Simison: Oh, you're good. Would the applicant like to come -- or I will do one more quick one to see if there is anybody else on -- on the call who would like to provide testimony. And seeing no hands raise, will ask the applicant to come back and close this up. Nary: Mr. Mayor, can I ask one question? I think the applicant could probably answer this. Simison: Yes. Nary: Mr. Mayor, Members of Council, so if the applicant can answer, I -- I noticed on the posting that it says it's 4.26 acres, but the staff report says it's 4.35 acres. So, if you could just explain the difference in that acreage, so it's clear for the record. Lardie: Mr. Mayor -- Mr. Mayor, Councilman -- or Council Members, this is Dan Lardie. So, as far as the acreage goes, the county site for some reason has it shown as 4.26 acres or -- and I checked with my surveyor and the surveyor -- you know, he attributes that it is 4.35 acres per survey on the ground. Nary: Perfect. Thank you. Lardie: Mr. Mayor, Council Members, so back to the -- Mr. and Mrs. Binford. We don't -- I don't think we have a problem placing a berm across the road and across our -- all the way to our west boundary. The question would be is we are --we are supposed to provide a link to them for future development by ACHD. The -- if they -- if ACHD will allow that berm and that -- then we can place it. The other -- the other issue I had -- so, during Planning and Zoning we were asked to provide an enhanced landscaping plan. However, no one could -- could place a quantity on that or what -- what that entailed. So, we provided an enhanced landscape plan and, of course, now it seems to be a moving target, which is what we were afraid of. It -- Mr. and Mrs. Binford, their property -- yes, it's -- it is important and I -- and I appreciate and want them to reserve their private property rights. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 69 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 43 of 61 The -- the -- they also had made a mention of the fact that they don't want to give up any land for -- for a taller berm. That's fine. We are okay with the 18 inch as stated by staff. The -- we can try some different fencing. No problem. As long as it meets City of Meridian's code we are -- I think we are okay with that. Within reason. They also made a mention that they would like final approval of such things that are -- that are established by -- and I -- and I just don't think that's a good precedent to send -- to set by staff or by the City of Meridian in accordance with, you know, just saying that, hey, your neighbor can decide what you can and can't do. With --with the Binfords it has always been proven to be a moving target and so with that I could stand for any other questions. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: I would like to ask the applicant their thoughts on the Commission's recommendation to require Lot 2, Block 2, to be converted to a common lot. Lardie: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Perreault, the -- we have actually created that lot because the ACHD would like to actually put a turnaround there, which makes that lot nonbuildable. So, we have made it -- we have turned it into a common lot. Perreault: Mr. Mayor, a follow up. Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: Is that actually going to be a functional open space for the residents or is that just going to be empty space? What -- what is that going to consist of? Lardie: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Perreault, so with the -- with the turnaround there, until the road extends, that lot will just be landscaped. There is -- there is not much left there to do much with. It will -- it has a drainage facility on it and, then, it will have some -- some grass and be landscaped. Simison: Just a question. Is it a functioning turnaround that people would be able to drive upon with the -- some sort of road structure? What -- what does that mean, turnaround from ACHD's standpoint or our expectations? Lardie: Mr. Mayor, yes, it -- it is -- it has to be a paved functioning turnaround. The sidewalk will continue and terminate at the boundary or the berm -- or the to be berm. But in order for fire trucks to go in and turn around they will have to turn around on the curb -- on the curb and, then, there will be a surface there for them to turn around at. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 70 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 44 of 61 Hoaglun: I just want to be sure I completely understand what I'm looking at. So -- and that road is currently constructed. What we see there, that road with that curb is in place right now; correct? Lardie: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Hoaglun, which road are you -- are you speaking of? Hoaglun: Where that -- that surrounds Block 2. Lardie: So, East Loggers Pass. It -- it is constructed up to our western boundary where that red arrow is on the slide that's up. Hoaglun: Okay. I'm sorry. On the preliminary plat where you have the blue star, that -- or purple star, whatever. The schematic to the left where Block 2 is, that -- that particular road is that in place? Lardie: Mr. Mayor, Council -- Council Member Hoaglun, no, that road is not in place. Hoaglun: Okay. So, also -- if I may follow up, Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: So, that Block 2, then, is going to be a drain for future development; is that correct? Lardie: Mr. Mayor, Council -- Council Member Hoaglun, the -- the drain on this -- on this slide that's up it's shown as a skinny drain and we don't need that much for this particular roadway. The -- because we are only -- we are only required to hold our -- our development on this particular site. Future developments would be required to retain their own drainage on their site. This slide that's up doesn't have a representation of that turnaround. It has -- it has an alternate turnaround that we were attempting, but the -- ACHD did not like and I had one in my -- in my PowerPoint proposal -- or a PowerPoint that showed that and I was trying to think if Sonya had it in her proposal -- or her -- her information. I don't remember that she did. Hoaglun: Yeah. Mr. Mayor, this -- I thought that -- yeah, I saw something with a -- with a turnaround, but if that road is not there with Block 2, to build that berm across there, to continue to the west boundary would -- would -- is something they could do and, yes, if they develop their property they would plow right -- you know, the developer -- whoever develops that property would plow right through and take it out, but that would be of no concern once the property is developed, but you can accomplish finishing out that berm and fencing to -- to that other boundary; is that correct? Lardie: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Hoaglun, that is correct. Hoaglun: Okay. Thank you. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 71 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 45 of 61 Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I guess a couple of questions. First about--about the berm and that road. The -- the residential homes that are going to access -- like their access is going to come off of that road; correct? Lardie: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Cavener, yes, that is correct. Cavener: Okay. I'm struggling to see how they are going to be able to access their home in a berm -- but maybe you guys have that -- have that figured out. My question, though, Mr. Mayor, if I may, pertains to the pathway. So, as I'm looking on this, it looks like that the pathway starts along the canal and, then, goes through the neighborhood and, then, reconnects along the canal -- kind of circumvents the canal and I'm curious if I'm -- if I'm seeing that correct and why we are doing that, as opposed to just having it follow the nature of the canal, as with the rest of the pathway. Lardie: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Cavener, so the -- the pathway does jog through the neighborhood. It does show that -- I guess your pathway--the City of Meridian's pathway master does say that it should follow the creek -- Ten Mile Creek. However, the homeowner would like to keep his home and it's within 30 feet of the canal, which doesn't provide us a pathway to put a pathway. I guess. It doesn't -- it doesn't provide us enough surface to get the cross-section of the pathway through that portion of the canal through -- by his home and et cetera. Cavener: So, Mr. Mayor, one more if I may. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I guess I'm not tracking you. Are you saying that you don't have enough land to be able to build the pathway there and so you can build it up against the other neighbor? That's how it looks. And I guess I'm trying to wrap my head around -- Lardie: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Cavener, so the -- the city requires a certain amount of distance -- the Nampa Highway -- or Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District, who manages the canal, requires another 50 feet of easement with that. There is only 30 feet from the existing home to the centerline of the canal -- or, excuse me, to the -- to the easement of Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District. So, there is no room to get that pathway in there. It's just really tight. Right here -- I don't know if -- I don't know if I'm -- my cursor is actually moving anything. Cavener: I'm not seeing it. Lardie: You are not seeing it. Sorry. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 72 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 46 of 61 Cavener: That's okay. I -- we are trying to make this work together. I appreciate your comments. Lardie: That's -- so -- and that's really the reason why the pathway winds through the -- through the -- through the site. Bongiorno: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Yes, Deputy Chief. Bongiorno: I did e-mail the alternate turnaround to Chris. I don't know if he has access to his e-mail. So you can see what Councilman Hoaglun was asking about. Simison: I assume Chris is looking for something right now. And I guess I'm -- I will ask the question -- from the conversation of Planning and Zoning are -- is the pathway amongst some of the reasons why Planning and Zoning was more interested in seeing this property redevelop as a group, compared to individual, or were there other reasons from a staff -- Sonya, if you can try to clarify or say why. Allen: And, yes, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, primarily it was because of the open space and site amenity requirement doesn't exist when the site is below five acres in size. So, that was a lot of it. They wanted to -- they wanted to see more common open space area and they are afraid that if this one's developed outside of that, then, maybe another one of the three properties would also develop individually without common area and site amenities. This -- this project does -- does have some. I mean it has the multi-use pathway. That's really about it. Simison: Well -- and I will speak to it, because I don't want to put Mr. Cavener on the spot, but I think that's an issue with Glacier Springs as well as -- I lived in that for a brief period with my in-laws and there is really no amenities in that subdivision either or open space, with the exception of the pathway, which currently even dead ends. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, you are a hundred percent correct. Aside from some greened up drainage pond, we do not have any amenities in that area, except for a pathway that -- that dead ends. Hoaglun: So, Mr. Mayor, just to follow up on the new preliminary plat that's up there with the turnaround, that would allow the access for firefighter -- for fire trucks to turn around until such time the other property is developed to drive completely through and -- and, chief, is -- is that -- that, I assume, is adequate for our Fire Department? Bongiorno: Mayor and Councilman Hoaglun, yeah, this was approved --the previous plat that was up was denied by ACHD for the turnaround and this was the alternate and it meets the -- the fire code. So, we are okay with it. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 73 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 47 of 61 Hoaglun: Okay. Thank you, chief. And, Mr. Mayor, if I might ask a question of Mr. Lardie then. With the pathway -- looking at that plan and how the pathway comes out, would that -- how is that pathway going to be constructed? Is that part of a sidewalk now or what's the plan for that? Lardie: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Hoaglun, this -- this is not the current turnaround. I apologize. There were several iterations of this and as you can well see it's -- it is -- it -- Chris, if you could find the -- the turnaround in my PowerPoint is the one that we were is the one that we are proposing and the one that will probably serve -- there it is. Hoaglun: There. Okay. Lardie: That might be more helpful to you, Mr. Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Yes, it is. Mr. Mayor and, Dan, yes, that -- that's the one I recall. I recall seeing one that was this one. So, back to Deputy Chief Bongiorno. It looks like 46 feet, that meets the requirements for the Fire Department? Bongiorno: Mayor and Council Hoaglun, no, it does not. It needs to be 48 feet. Hoaglun: Forty-eight. Okay. Bongiorno: Yes, sir. Hoaglun: And that -- Mr. Mayor and Dan, that -- it's blurry. So, is that 49 feet or 46 feet? I really can't tell. Lardie: Mr. Mayor and Council Member Hoaglun, I apologize, I am looking at the same slide and you have me at the same disadvantage. It's easy to turn it to 48 and it -- and it will fit. But I don't have a larger plan with me. I apologize. Bongiorno: Mayor and Councilman Hoaglun, if -- if that goes to 48 feet, then, it will meet the fire code. I apologize. I thought I had the latest one. Simison: And, Dan, just to clarify, if you have to berm that area, does that -- do you still think you have got the space to put 48 feet into that? Lardie: Mr. Mayor, I believe, yes, even with -- even with -- we moving that to 48 feet we -- we can slide it to the north just a little bit in order to accommodate a berm to -- to assist the -- or to be a good neighbor to our neighbors. Johnson: Mr. Mayor, you also have the Binfords are asking to speak again, if you are willing to entertain more testimony. Simison: Council, I'm going to defer to you all. We are at the applicant and they are the ones to speak last. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 74 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 48 of 61 Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I did have further questions for -- for the Binfords based on the information I received. Can I have one of them come up -- or open up to answer -- answer a question about the berming and fencing? Simison: Council, are we open to bring back -- we haven't closed the hearing yet, so we will give the applicant another shot at this once the Binfords provide comment or answer questions or both. A.Binford: Hi. This is Aneke. Am I unmuted now? Simison: Yes, you are. If you could give your name and address for the record. A.Binford: Okay. It's 3101 Mesa Way, Meridian. And I would -- I just wanted to clarify, I'm not sure if Mr. Lardie was confused by my testimony. We are not opposed to giving up part of our-- a portion of our land in order to achieve a three foot berm, because, quite frankly, without a three foot berm we probably are not going to be able to flood irrigate without, you know, trespassing our water onto this subdivision. We just wanted to, you know, make a note that we are doing that, we are giving up a part of -- a portion of our land in order to achieve the goal that we need to be able to irrigate based on this, you know, development. That -- that was really the only comment that I wanted to make, that we are not in any way opposed to giving up a portion of our land to do that, so -- and, then, as far as the enhanced landscaping. That's -- you know, that's something that we can work out at a point down the road. We just were asking for more of a vegetative buffer versus just trees, you know, spread out throughout the berm and, then, I think that was -- my husband -- there was one other item he wanted to make, but I can't remember what he was saying. Yeah. Just -- I think just -- that the berm and the fencing do extend all the way down to the -- to the very end of our property. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Yeah. So, I wanted to make sure that one of the questions I had was about the height of the berm, because there has been discussion about 18 inches and three foot. So, a three foot berm the length of your property is acceptable, along with enhanced fencing and that's something I will ask Dan about in a bit when we go back to him. Enhanced with -- with the -- not the pole fencing and not chain link, but something that looks a little nicer; right? A.Binford: Yeah. It should -- we were kind of hoping that it would match whatever they are putting on the other side. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 75 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 49 of 61 Hoaglun: Okay. I will follow up with him on that. The enhanced landscaping -- when I was looking at the photos that you -- you were showing -- and I think it was Glacier Bay that -- it had the houses and Chris brought in the photo, so we could see that, yes, it was bermed up a little bit. There were some trees along there, but they were on your side. Were those trees that you had planted? A.Binford: So, there is trees on both sides. There are some evergreen trees that sit on top of the berm that the developer put in and, then, we have also planted trees on our side. Some poplars and willows. Hoaglun: Okay. And, Mr. Mayor and Aneke, the reason I asked -- you know, we throw around words like enhanced and different things. I really don't know what that means. What it means to me is completely something different to someone else. So, I didn't know if you think is that enhanced, is that something that would be acceptable if that was on the other -- over here on this -- this berm area and on the other -- so, that's -- that's kind of -- I guess can you give me a definition of enhanced? A.Binford: Oh, was that question to me? Hoaglun: Yeah. It's for you. For -- A.Binford: Yeah. Hoaglun: What -- what would that look like? A.Binford: Well, enhanced landscaping is just more than just a few trees plunked down on top of a berm, because the situation that we are -- we are worried we are going to run into is that where that slope of the berm will be extended onto our property now we are responsible for doing something with it. So, we are going to have this huge dirt berm that we are going to have to try and control weeds on and, you know, we will eventually have to plant something on it, because it's, you know, kind of hideous. So, that's our big concern is we would like it to look like a landscaped area and not just a big dirt berm, you know, that's kind of outside of our control and it is an ambiguous term, enhanced landscaping. What does that mean? Does that mean, you know, landscape fabric? Does it mean perma bark. Does it mean gravel? Extra shrubs? So, that's -- that's kind of what -- what we were trying to figure out is how -- how do we make sure that even if this goes into a development agreement that there is a berm and a fence and landscaping included, how do we make sure that we don't end up with just this dirt mound that's completely hideous. You know, that -- I guess we are just feeling a little bit out of control with -- with how that's going to look. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 76 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 50 of 61 Hoaglun: Yeah. I certainly understand that and that's why a lot of these questions we are just trying to figure out how -- how do we make this work. It sounds like, you know, there has been discussions and there has been some agreements and as long as we can make sure everyone's understanding the same thing. Would you anticipate -- I know the developer would put landscaping on -- on their side of the fence, whatever that looks like to be determined. Are you expecting landscaping to be done on your side by the developer of that line -- your property? A.Binford: Well, that would be preferable. Hoaglun: Okay. Good -- good to know. Thank you. Simison: And this is a question -- I don't know -- it's -- because we are talking a little bit about the fence. You know, typically along pathways it's a four foot wrought iron fence, which is what is -- I believe what is generally recommended, but I also am under the understanding from --we typically do not like to fence two sides of a pathway as a general rule, so I'm guessing that we do not want both sides of the fence to be identical, if one side is the four foot wrought iron, but I wonder if Garrett or -- I don't know if we have anyone from the Police Department on or if Sonya could weigh in on that aspect. Allen: Mr. Mayor, I'm sorry, I was only half listening. Members of the Council. Were you referencing the fence line? Simison: Yeah. Just the -- typically I don't think the Police Department supports having a fully fenced pathway on both sides in this -- would this typically be a four foot wrought iron on the -- on the new home side and, then, do we want the same or not want the same on the other side? Allen: Well, we have code that actually speaks to that and I believe that they can do a four solid, if they are wanting to do a solid material, with two feet of semi-private on the top or they can do a six foot open vision or four foot open vision. So, if there is a preference of Council as to if it's closed vision for screening purposes for the Binfords, they should probably specify that as our-- as our code does allow the open vision as well. Simison: Sonya, my question went more to fencing both sides of a pathway. That's what my understanding is, that we typically do not like to see both sides completely fenced in, because it basically creates an area where no one can escape if there is an attack in that area. I'm being -- you know, that's what I have heard. Allen: Well, I -- I haven't understood that from the Police Department, but maybe you have. The -- the standards -- that's why the standards of strict solid fencing to four feet, so that there is some visibility of the pathway. But, again, if you -- if there is somebody there from police tonight that would like to speak up, they could clarify that. Bongiorno: Mayor and City Council, I was just texting Shawn to see if he's on. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 77 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 51 of 61 Harper: I don't have any specific clarification on that. I would probably have to do a little more research to figure out what kind of precedent we have set in regards to those pathways, because a lot of times that -- if there is no lighting and, then, like you were saying, Mayor, with fencing on both sides that can bring on some safety challenges. So, that would be something I would have to get back to staff to clarify. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: If I might throw this in, though, as we consider this, I would think if it's required to have at least one side lower for lighting, safety, access, that sort of thing, it would be on the property to be developed, as opposed to Binford's side. I think they should have the six foot privacy fence that allows their property to be blocked from --from the pathway based on they were there and so that's kind of how I see that and we could research that and if a lower fence is required that it would be placed on -- on the property under the Bannock Ridge property as the homes are developed. Allen: Mr. Mayor, if I may. Simison: Yes, you may. Allen: City code does not -- it -- it prohibits a six foot tall solid fence adjacent to pathways and interior common open space areas, so, please, don't make that a requirement or it will be in conflict with our code. Hoaglun: So, Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: So, if I might ask Sonya. So, it --we cannot have on either side a six foot fence or just on one side it's allowed, but not -- not two sides? Allen: No. A six foot tall solid fence is not allowed adjacent to pedestrian pathways or interior common open space areas for visibility reasons. Hoaglun: Okay. Allen: And according CPTED standards. Again, if you are doing a solid fence you can go up to four feet in height, just that in itself, or they could be allowed to add two feet of semi-private fence, which is defined by city code as being 20 percent closed vision with 80 percent open vision or you could do an open vision fence. Hoaglun: Okay. Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 78 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 52 of 61 Hoaglun: To follow up with Sonya then. So, they could have a four foot solid -- we will say vinyl fence for four feet, have the open vision latticework type of thing for the next two feet, so it's a six foot fence and there is no prohibition -- it has to be bermed to -- for the irrigation purposes, that fence can sit on top of that needed berm; is that correct? Allen: That is correct. There is nothing in our code that would prohibit that that I'm aware of. Hoaglun: Okay. Thank you. Simison: Yeah. And what I'm referring to -- more to is the -- the concept that I believe is -- what I have heard from our chief say is we typically don't like to have two sides of a pathway completely fence and that would be four foot open vision on both sides even and I think there is --there is probably some distance thresholds where that's not an issue or lighting thresholds. You know, I have got a -- right down from my house on both sides of me I have got two micro paths, which are, you know, probably about 70 feet in length, which are fenced on both sides by open vision, but I believe that as you extend the length of a pathway and you don't have an escape point for people within that space, that's what we are really talking about and I don't know the length of this pathway that we are -- that runs along this area to know if it is longer than police may or may not like to have completely enclosed pathway. Harper: And, Mayor, we are trying to -- Mr. Mayor? Simison: Mr. Harper. Harper: Mayor, Members of Council, I agree with you, Mayor. This is kind of an interesting project and it's kind of hard to figure out exactly what it looks like from looking on this little map, but I would agree, I mean we -- we want to make it as safe as possible for people who are traveling through this area on foot or on bikes and families, whatever it may be. So, I mean putting two large fences on both sides I don't think would be something that we would recommend, but I would -- to be honest with you, would really like to see it in person to get a better depiction of what it looks like. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I have some similar in our subdivision where we had an existing subdivision, they have got the six foot solid fencing, because it's an older part of the development. They ended up where Reta Huskey Park is they ended up developing the Creason Lateral as -- as a pathway and they have the four foot open fence on -- on the new development side to provide that light access and complete lack of privacy to their backyards, but that's another issue. If I might ask one of the Binford -- since we are -- we are trying to -- trying to nail down details to make things work, I just -- I want to get their input on a three foot Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 79 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 53 of 61 berm with a solid four foot fencing and a two foot open lattice type of system. Their thoughts on that. A.Binford: I think that would be ideal and, like you said, if it can sit on top of the berm that's going to provide us, you know, not only the ability to irrigate, so we have the berm now that's a barrier and a buffer for our water, but, then, also, you know, something that helps to protect our privacy as well and we are not opposed to an open -- I mean our understanding in -- in researching this was that it -- that it needed to be kind of an open -- open fencing, but I mean if -- if you could do a solid with, you know, the -- the open latticework on top as high as we can go would be great. Hoaglun: Yeah. Mr. Mayor and Aneke, yes. And that would go all the way to the end of your property line? A.Binford: Yes. Hoaglun: Yes. Yeah. That would -- that would be the -- the plan and I think they agreed to that, so -- and if you are good with that, that, hopefully, rectifies that in making sure the drainage stays open for your water and your neighbor's water to exit the property during -- during development, so -- A.Binford: Yes. Simison: Council, would you like to hear from the applicant again at this point in time? Because they have the last word. Just want to make sure you are done with the Binfords at this point in time. Okay. We will ask the applicant to -- Dan, if you would like to provide any feedback on the comments you just heard. Lardie: Mr. Mayor, Council Members, so as far as -- as far as I understand is we are trying to -- we want to accomplish a three foot berm from all the way across our south boundary, including the roadway and the -- our open space. Along with that a four foot --four foot solid fence with a --with an open two foot lattice on top and, then, other fencing may be -- may be determined in the future for our development? Is that what I'm understanding? Simison: I think that's what Councilman Hoaglun has suggested. Lardie: Okay. I just wanted to make sure that that was clear. With that I will stand for any questions. Thank you. Have a good evening. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor, if I might follow up with Dan. You are -- you are good with that situation? Now, it may be that your property -- on the other -- the Binford property, those homes you develop, you know, they don't want any fencing and it just accesses the pathway, but if there is fencing requested that it would be four foot. Lardie: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Hoaglun, yes, that -- that is the understanding. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 80 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 54 of 61 Hoaglun: Okay. Thank you. Simison: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Question for Sonya. Sonya, on this -- the original application that took all three properties together, did the pathway run along the Ten Mile Creek continually or was it broken up and ran through the neighborhood? Allen: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Cavener, I believe that it went around through the neighborhood as well. Chris, there is a -- I believe a copy of the previous plat in my presentation, if you could go back a couple slides. Or the existing approved plat I should say. Go back one more, please. Thank you. Yeah. You can see the pathway. They were trying to retain that existing home along the north boundary adjacent to the creek as well, so that pathway ran along the southern and western boundary, similar to what it is now. Cavener: Okay. Okay. Thank you. Allen: Yes. Nary: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Mr. Nary. Nary: Yes. Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, I just want to be sure -- if you -- if your desire is that the -- that the fencing on the Bannock Ridge side of the pathway is limited to four feet in height, that you specifically call that out as part of your motion, because, otherwise, they would still be able to put a four foot fence with two foot lattice on their side, because the code would allow it. So, if you want to make sure to limit it to four feet, I would include that in your motion. Simison: Yeah. And that was my concern. I mean the three foot berm with a four foot fence with a two foot ladder, that's a nine foot barrier. I mean that's -- that's huge, especially when you have four foot-- and this is -- maybe this --there is no redevelopment of this property for the next 30 years, 40 years, who knows, but, regardless, a nine foot fence in that location does not seem to be appropriate along a pathway. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Yeah. And I understand that, but we are requiring that three foot -- foot -- if -- as our Council Members may go, you know, a four foot solid fence on top of the berm should be plenty. You know, I was just trying to figure that out. If they get a six foot fence Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 81 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 55 of 61 on top of that, that enhances the privacy and -- and any trespass issues, so -- and maybe with a berm -- you know, a berm you can -- you can walk on and jump a four foot fence, so that's -- from a privacy standpoint I was -- that's why I was including it with the extra lattice on top. That's see through, but harder to -- harder to jump. So, if we were to do that, yes, I could see the need for a four foot fence on -- on the other side. Harper: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Mr. Harper. Harper: Mayor, Members of the Council, I just kind of reached out to get some clarification and I think our code is pretty clear on -- on when it comes to fencing on pathways. CPTED kind of -- CPTED rules kind of vary, but I know Sonya was talking about the code and I think it's important that we stick as closely to that, because that was developed more than anything for safety reasons. Borton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Mr. Borton. Borton: I think Councilman Hoaglun's solution in these circumstances make good sense to the south and, then, the accommodation to the north with the four foot limit. All of that seems appropriate. Simison: Council, do I have any further questions you would like to ask or do I have a motion to close the public hearing or what directions? Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: I move that we close the public hearing for H-2019-0143. Hoaglun: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 82 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 56 of 61 Cavener: I'm happy to kick things off for deliberation. I really love our Council in that we -- we take these small issues and we really wrestle with them and dig into them and try and find a solution that benefits everybody and I appreciate our work on that tonight. That said, I don't think that I'm in support of this application and for one big reason and it's something that I have learned by being on the Council for six years are some of the well intended actions that have long lasting repercussions as it pertains to sidewalks in -- in Meridian, specifically in south Meridian where we have just kind of this patchwork makeup of sidewalks where you have got sidewalks and, then, a big gap and, then, more sidewalks and, then, ultimately, it's us as a Council trying to come up with taxpayer dollars to try and fill in those gaps and I worry is that on this particular piece where you went from kind of three pieces of land with one total project that would have filled in a gap on a sidewalk there, that if we part and piece this that we will never solve the sidewalk problem on -- on -- on Victory between Locust Grove and Meridian Road. I like the application as was previously presented. I'm not supportive of this DA. I really applaud the applicant trying to make something work here. Obviously, that connection of the pathway is a nice connection for south Meridian. Again, it would serve my neighborhood well, because we have got a pathway to nowhere. I just think that if-- if we aren't beholden to keep getting these sidewalks connected along the way, that future councils are going to be saying, well, why -- why did the past city council approve this? Or they are going to be saying let's kick in some, you know, taxpayer dollars to get the sidewalk connected there. So, I can't support it. Simison: And while I don't have a vote on this, if we have to build a nine foot structure for a pathway, I think that we are probably not approving the right project. Now, that doesn't seem to be -- it -- whether it's a timing issue or anything else, that to me seems overkill for any pathway in our community. That's just my two cents. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Yeah. And I understand that. That's a -- that's an issue that, you know, I -- I -- I would be willing if it -- if it helps your heartburn, you know, with the three foot berm to go with the four foot solid fence. That gives them seven feet. I mean part of it is -- if people want to do harm or do wrong they will figure out a way to do it, whether it's seven foot or nine foot. You know, if that -- if that works a little better for you and it still gives them privacy, because that would be a solid fence and from their -- their viewpoint that would be seven foot that they can't see and people walking on the path. That's -- that's a seven foot fence as well. And, then, you would have the four foot fence like -- like we have here in my subdivision, one side has the six foot fence, the other side has the four foot fence. I'm coming from it -- having been in Binford's shoes where we were a farm property and -- and development moved in around us and working with the developer trying to make that work and put those things into place. So, I'm -- I'm very aware of how -- they are being squeezed and it happens and -- and you are -- you are willing to go along with it, but you are trying to protect what you have to a certain degree to keep that -- that feeling of -- of open space, if you will, to as much as you can. So, that -- that's my desire there. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 83 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 57 of 61 Some members feel like, hey, just go with the four foot fence. That's the best we can do, that -- I'm fine with that. Simison: And, Councilman Hoaglun, I think you kind of hit it on the head. This is -- to me we are trying to protect too much in this area. We have another home on this property that doesn't want to redevelop, which is creating some of the challenges. You -- you don't -- kind of going back to the other point, you have got Glacier Springs, which doesn't really have too many amenities or other elements. This piece of property would be in the same situation. You throw in a large fence for the pathway, it just seems to be there is a lot of elements that we are trying to make accommodate an area which maybe is not ready to develop altogether. Again, I don't have a vote, so I'm not going to tell you where -- how high your fence should be or-- or where -- what you should do, but, you know, this almost goes back a little bit -- to me it's a little round peg in a square hole trying to make it work, when the area is not ready to redevelop is what I'm hearing. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? I appreciate that -- that perspective and if we are ready to move forward on it, we got to find ways to make it work. They are providing 11 percent in an area that didn't -- doesn't require it. It does move pathways, but if we are trying to slam a peg in there that doesn't fit, then -- then we will just have to move on. So, I will hold off on making any motion at the time. Simison: Councilman Bernt? Bernt: I -- am I on? I -- I don't want to regurgitate what's been said. I agree with Councilman Cavener. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: I haven't spoken a lot during this application, because I'm wrestling with it and I tend to agree with the Commission's recommendation that they would like to see this entire 13 acres that was originally part of the DA developed together. That's tough, because you have three different property owners who have very different ideas about what they want to do with their properties. But I think if we look at the big picture of what we as a city have set out to do with -- with our Comprehensive Plan, our focus has really been on -- on trying to not develop in these small pieces, in these five acre sections. It creates too much of a patchwork and so just in that -- in that vein, I would say that -- that while I completely respect the applicant's right to pursue this and I think that they have done as absolutely best they could possibly do with this small size property, the plat that they have created -- they really are -- have worked very hard to make it work. Just from a big picture standpoint I would feel a lot more comfortable if-- if we weren't allowing such small acreages to --to develop, unless they are in -- completely surrounded by properties that are already annexed, like we have discussed our focus on in-fill projects. This is not one of those. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 84 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 58 of 61 Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I'm not sure if anyone else wants to chime in. If not, I'm happy to make a motion. Simison: Mr. Borton, would you like to speak on this item? Okay. Councilman Cavener, if you are up for it, go ahead. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, I move that we deny Item 6-J, A DA for Bannock Ridge, H-2019- 0143. Bernt: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to deny the application. Is there any discussion on the motion? Nary: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Mr. Nary. Nary: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Cavener and second, I just want to be clear your -- your basis is you would like to remain with the current existing development agreement on this property and not allow the separation into separate pieces and, therefore, it's not in the best interest of the city to allow this amendment. Is that what I heard? Cavener: Yes. Mr. Mayor. Mr. Nary, thank you for -- for chatting me through that. You have absolutely summarized my comments in my head from probably not the exact way that I articulated them in my motion. So, I appreciate that. Nary: That's perfect. Thank you. Simison: If there is no discussion on the motion, I will ask the clerk to call the roll. Roll call: Bernt, yea; Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, absent; Perreault, yea. Simison: The motion is adopted. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. K. Public Hearing for Andorra Senior Living (H-2019-0127) by Sawtooth Development Group, LLC, Located at 715 & 955 S. Wells St. and 971 E. Wells Circle 1. Request: Annexation of 16.99 acres of land with TN-R zoning with a conceptual development plan for a senior (age 55 and Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 85 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 59 of 61 older) living community consisting of (76) single-family dwelling units and a 3-story apartment building with 88 dwelling units and a building footprint of 30,000 square feet; and, 2. Request: Request to Vacate existing ACHD right-of-way (unnamed cul-de-sac) consisting of 0.45 of an acre of land that lies between the properties located at 715 and 955 S. Wells St. & 971 E. Wells Circle. Simison: Thank you very much to all for your time and attention this evening. Item 6-K is a public hearing for Andorra Senior Living, H-2019-0127. It has been requested to continue to May 19th. Bill, do I need to open the public hearing? I'm sorry. Was that a yes? Nary: Yes, sir. Yes. Simison: I will open the public hearing on this item. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I move that we continue Item No. H-2019-0127, Andorra Senior Living, to May 19, 2020. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to continue the public hearing on Item 6-K, H- 2019-0127. Is there discussion on the motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 6: Ordinances [Action Item] A. Ordinance No. 20-1878: An Ordinance (H-2019-0109 — Edington Commons) for Annexation of a Parcel of Land Being a Portion of the W '/2 SW '/4 SW '/4 of Section 36 Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, as Described in Attachment " A" and Annexing Certain Lands and Territory, Situated in Ada County, Idaho, and Adjacent and Contiguous to Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 86 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 60 of 61 the Corporate Limits of the City of Meridian as Requested by the City of Meridian; Establishing and Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification of 14.564 Acres of Land From RUT to R-15 Medium High Density Residential) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code; Providing That Copies of This Ordinance Shall be Filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as Required by Law; and Providing for a Summary of the Ordinance; and Providing for a Waiver of the Reading Rules; and Providing an Effective Date Simison: Next item up is Ordinance 7-A, Ordinance No. 20-1878. 1 will ask the clerk to read this ordinance by title. Weatherly: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Ordinance No. 20-1878, an Ordinance, H-2019-0109, Edington Commons, for annexation of a parcel of land being a portion of the W '/2 SW '/4 SW '/4 of Section 36, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise meridian,Ada county, Idaho, as described in Attachment " A" and annexing certain lands and territory situated in Ada county, Idaho, and adjacent and contiguous to the corporate limits of the City of Meridian as requested by the City of Meridian; establishing and determining the land use zoning classification of 14.564 acres of land from RUT to R-15 (Medium High Density residential) zoning district in the Meridian City Code; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; and providing for a summary of the ordinance; and providing for a waiver of the reading rules; and providing an effective date. Simison: Thank you. Would anyone like this ordinance read in its entirety? If not, is there any discussion on the ordinance? I will ask the clerk to call the roll. Weatherly: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Borton -- Cavener: I don't think anybody's made a motion. Weatherly: Oh, I'm sorry. Perreault: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Perreault. Perreault: I move that we adopt Ordinance No. 20-1878, with the suspension of rules. Cavener: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second. Is there discussion on the motion? Cavener: Sorry for interrupting things. Sorry, Mr. Mayor. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 28,2020— Page 87 of 272 Meridian City Council April 14,2020 Page 61 of 61 Simison: You're good. If not, the clerk will call the roll. Roll call: Bernt, yea; Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, absent; Perreault, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion passes. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 7: Future Meeting Topics Simison: We have reached to Item 8. Future Meeting Topics. Is there any item for future meetings? If not, I will entertain a motion. Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I move that we adjourn the meeting. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to adjourn the meeting. Any discussion on the Motion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Simison: We are adjourned. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9.26 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 4 / 28 / 2020 _ MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK E IDIAN --- IDAHO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Agenda Item Number: 5 A Item Title: Meeting Notes: (�E IDI y ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item - 5.A. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item -The Week of the Young Child Council Notes: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Upload Date Proclamation WOYC Backup Material 4/9/2020 REVIEWERS: Department Reviewer Action Date Clerk. Weatherly, Adrienne Approved 4/9/2020 - 3:02 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 5 of 242 E IDIAN�- IDAHO The Office of the .Mayor PRO C .1 A 'AlArriow WHEREAS, the City of Meridian in conjunction with the Idaho Association for the Education of Young Children (Idaho AEYC) and National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC), are celebrating the Week of the Young ChildTM; and WHEREAS, these organizations are working to promote and inspire high-quality early childhood experiences for our state's youngest citizens, that can provide a foundation of learning and success for children in Meridian; and WHEREAS, teachers and others who work with, or on behalf of young children from birth through age eight, make a difference in these lives and deserve thanks and recognition; and WHEREAS, public policies supporting early learning for all are crucial to young children's futures and to the prosperity of our society; and WHEREAS, this is a time to.recognize the importance of children's earliest years in shaping their development and to recommit ourselves to ensuring that each and every child experiences the type of environment—at home, at child care, at school, and in the community—that will promote early learning. THEREFORE, I, Mayor Robert E. Simison, proclaim April 11-17t', 2020 to be Jhe 'Week of the young Cht'Cd in the city of Meridian and encourage all citizens to work to support the efforts of Idaho AEYS and NAEYC and invest in early childhood in r mmunity. Dated this 14th day of April 2020 �4z&_� RoVerit E. Simikonjlayor Treg Bernt, City Council President ' Brad Hoaglun, City Council Vice-President gym, Joe Borton, City Council Luke Cavener, City Council Jessica Perrault, City Council Liz Strader, City Council Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 6 of 242 E IDIAN --- IDAHO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Agenda Item Number: 6 A Item Title: Meeting Notes: CiWE I� ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item - 6.A. Presenter: Mayor Simison Estimated Time for Presentation: 3 minutes Title of Item - Resolution No. 20-2201: A Resolution Of The Mayor And The City Council Of The City Of Meridian,Appointing Elizabeth "Lizzie" Taylor To Seat 1 And Jenifer Cavaness- Williams To Seat 7 Of The Meridian Arts Commission; And Providing An Effective Date. Council Notes: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Upload Date Resolution Resolution 4/8/2020 Taylor Application Backup Material 4/8/2020 Cavaness-Williams application Backup Material 4/8/2020 REVIEWERS: Department Reviewer Action Date Legal. Johnson, Chris Approved 4/8/2020 - 5:00 PM Legal. Albertson, Michelle Approved 4/8/2020 -5:04 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 7 of 242 CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 20-2201 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, HOAGLUN, PERREAULT, STRADER A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, APPOINTING ELIZABETH "LIZZIE" TAYLOR TO SEAT 1 AND JENIFER CAVANESS-WILLIAMS TO SEAT 7 OF THE MERIDIAN ARTS COMMISSION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Meridian City Code § 2-1-1 establishes the Meridian Arts Commission, its members and terms of their appointments; and WHEREAS, Seat 1 and 7 of the Meridian Arts Commission are currently vacant; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian deem the appointment of Elizabeth "Lizzie" Taylor to Seat 1 and Jenifer Cavaness-Williams to Seat 7 of the Meridian Arts Commission to be in the best interest of the Meridian Arts Commission and of the City of Meridian; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section 1. That pursuant to Meridian City Code § 2-1-1, Elizabeth "Lizzie" Taylor is appointed to Seat 1 of the Meridian Arts Commission, for a term to expire February 28, 2023. Section 2. That pursuant to Meridian City Code § 2-1-1, Jenifer Cavaness-Williams is appointed to Seat 7 Meridian Arts Commission, for a term to expire February 28, 2021. Section 3. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this day of April, 2020. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this day of April, 2020. APPROVED: ATTEST: Mayor Robert E. Simison Chris Johnson RESOLUTION APPOINTING CAVANESMS-WILLIAMS AND TAYLOR—MERIDIAN ARTS C�OMMISt S2IO2N eridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— age 8 0 4 wIDIAN�-- Application to be Considered for City-Appointed or Volunteer Positions Position Applying for: 0 Parks &Recreation Commission 0 Planning&Zoning Commission 0 Meridian Arts Commission O Historic Preservation Commission 0 Transportation Commission O Impact Fee Advisory Committee 0 Solid Waste Advisory Commission C3 Other 0 General Volunteer Position on Special Projects or Events as Needed (appointment not required) Name: j (,,,- Home Address: 3 g &,+e" -b r. Telephone: �v a 1 E-Mail Address: O S+�t- }� i�2� C vx4vv, Occupation: �1 Are you a resident of the City of Meridian? I$I Yes O No If not, do you live in Meridian's area of impact? O Yes O No Why do you want to become involved? 46(4 bVerl A r5 �''�c5 h Nt L6co `_k I114- BL4U Do you participate inany local service clubs or other organizations? 6 Yes ` O No If so, please list: It� it2 l� 5 C"+!� I li' � �LF1 V a�! A t45 5 Wheat areas of city government are of most interest to you? Ar r,5 NYLym'5C)i(► % Have you participated Iin any level of volunteer government service in the past? 14 Yes 0 No If so,please list: ?0111!1 `piwi 0J&'V5 + T Do you understand the time commitment required to attend meetings and review/research data to make recommendations? 31 Yes O No pQ, Signature Date r Please return your completed application,resume, and letter of interest to: City Clerk's Office, City of Meridian, 33 E. Broadway Avenue,Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: (208) 888-4433 Fax: (208) 888-4218 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 9 of 242 VIE IIDIAN - Application to be Considered for City-Appointed or Volunteer Positions Position Applying for: O Parks & Recreation Commission 0 Planning & Zoning Commission 0 Meridian Arts Commission 0 Historic Preservation Commission O Transportation Commission 0 Impact Fee Advisory Committee O Solid Waste Advisory Commission 0 Other 0 General Volunteer Position on Special Projects or Events as Needed (appointment not required) Name: Jenifer Cavaness-Williams Home Address: 3566 W. Muirfield Dr., Meridian ID Telephone: 208-283-8948 E-Mail Address: jahanaradancer�g mail.com Occupation: West Ada School District ELA Teacher, dance instructor and performer Are you a resident of the City of Meridian? 0 Yes O No If not, do you live in Meridian's area of impact? 13 Yes O No Why do you want to become involved? I would like to help the City of Meridian's Arts Commission fulfill its mission, and I have been involved in arts almost all of my life. Do you participate in any local service clubs or other organizations? O Yes © No If so, please list: What areas of city government are of most interest to you? Arts Commission Parks and Recreation Have you participated in any level of volunteer government service in the past? 0 Yes 0 No If so, please list: Do you understand the time commitment required to attend meetings and review/research data to make recommendations? 0 Yes O No Signature Date Please return your completed application, resume, and letter of interest to: RECEIVE19s Office, City of Meridian, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: (208) 888-4433 Fax: (208) 888-4218 JAN 3 1 2020 CITY OF MERIDIAN Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 12 of 242 n4avnD1Q nr:�:irF E IDIAN --- IDAHO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Agenda Item Number: 6 B Item Title: Meeting Notes: CiWE I� ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item - 6.B. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: Title of Item - Resolution No. 20-2202: A Resolution Of The Mayor And The City Council Of The City Of Meridian,Appointing Jared Smith To Seat 7 Of The Meridian Transportation Commission; And Providing An Effective Date. Council Notes: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Upload Date Resolution Resolution 4/8/2020 Smth Application Backup Material 4/8/2020 REVIEWERS: Department Reviewer Action Date Mayors Office Johnson, Chris Approved 4/8/2020 - 5:20 PM Mayors Office Weatherly,Adrienne Approved 4/9/2020 - 3:20 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 16 of 242 CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 20-2202 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT,BORTON, CAVENER, HOAGLUN, PERREAULT, STRADER A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, APPOINTING JARED SMITH TO SEAT 7 OF THE MERIDIAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Meridian City Code 2-1-1 establishes the Meridian Transportation Commission, its members and terms of their appointments; and WHEREAS, Seat 7 of the Meridian Transportation Commission is currently vacant; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Meridian deems the appointment of Jared Smith to Seat 7 of the Meridian Transportation Commission to be in the best interest of the Meridian Transportation Commission and of the City of Meridian; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY,IDAHO: Section 1. That pursuant to Meridian City Code § 2-1-1, Jared Smith is hereby appointed to Seat 7 of the Meridian Transportation Commission, for a term to expire May 31, 2021. Section 2. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this day of April, 2020. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this day of April, 2020. APPROVED: Mayor Robert E. Simison ATTEST: By: Chris Johnson, City Clerk RESOLUTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF JARED SMITH—MERIDIAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 17 of 242 (:>WERIDIAN* Application to be Considered for City-Appointed or Volunteer Positions Position Applying for: 0 Parks & Recreation Commission 0 Planning &Zoning Commission 0 Meridian Arts Commission O Historic Preservation Commission )9 Transportation Commission 0 Impact Fee Advisory Committee O Solid Waste Advisory Commission 0 Other JX General Volunteer Position on Special Projects or Events as Needed (appointment not required) Name: ABC' �_) 1\/\ Home Address: "I�J� R��t�� L � . Mr2ti�i �+ M C] jQly Telephone: (90 Z) Z3 -? - -US-3 E-Mail AddresJss: M 1'TM t�F pt L.3� �' rYl�4►L Cam^^ Occupation: " ,A�1-1�-E E�kL t-1 �rv�tr•�5 i _ Are you a resident of the City of Meridian? Yes 0 No If not, do you live in Meridian's area of impact? O Yes O No Why do you want to become involved? v7Dtsv t o LASF �'o Heu 5l�"E MA ir�4ilL cI fu\rA IL. iN %ck ti - t 4 -)Q, L0 LNt]•3 fti �C JW C►T►-COI• Do you participate in any local service clubs or other organizations? 0 Yes No If so, please list: mv, F►N,.)C i£ j2\1mi3RC v �ti �SNs�c. lr sJc� E�"Z to l,,:,c_ r r"-a of N-r-5 `t Q o C Ct_Ova S . What areas of city government are of most interest to you? �A-3S Q0(L--A; a,-) �r*f �LG� t ---►� ► -�r ►'7v1$� �L A� - Have you participated in any level of volunteer government service in the past? O Yes No If so, please list: T NA.1Jr •N% A __ '��O S18E 1%-E.-•PIE 2 Do you understand the time commitment required to attend meetings and review/research data to make recommendations? Yes t 0 No Signature A4Date &.2. Please return your completed application, resume, and letter of interest to: City Clerk's Office, City of Meridian, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642 RECEIVED Phone: (208) 888-4433 Fax: (208) 888-4218 JAN 2 7 2020 CITY OF MERIDIAN Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 18 of 242 MAYOR'S OFFICE E IDIAN --- IDAHO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Agenda Item Number: 6 C Item Title: Meeting Notes: CiQ fE I� ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item - 6.C. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: Title of Item - Resolution No. 20-2203: A Resolution Authorizing the Continuance of a Local Disaster Emergency Declaration and its Terms for an Additional Thirty (30) Days; Authorizing the Continued Immediate Expenditure of Public Money to Safeguard Life, Health and Property; and Providing an Effective Date Council Notes: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Upload Date A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CONTINUANCE OF A LOCAL DISASTER EMERGENCY DECLARATION AND ITS TERMS FOR AN ADDITIONAL THIRTY(30) DAYS; AUTHORIZING THE Resolution 4/8/2020 CONTINUED IMMEDIATE EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC MONEYTO SAFEGUARD LIFE, HEALTH AND PROPERTYAND PROVIDING AN E REVIEWERS: Department Reviewer Action Date Legal. Weatherly, Adrienne Approved 4/9/2020 - 9:40 AM Legal. Baird, Ted Approved 4/9/2020 - 3:02 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 21 of 242 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-044777 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=2 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 04/17/2020 12:40 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE RESOLUTION NO. 20-2203 BY THE COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, HOAGLUN, PERREAULT, STRADER A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CONTINUANCE OF A LOCAL DISASTER EMERGENCY DECLARATION AND ITS TERMS FOR AN ADDITIONAL THIRTY (30) DAYS; AUTHORIZING THE CONTINUED IMMEDIATE EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC MONEY TO SAFEGUARD LIFE, HEALTH AND PROPERTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19)pandemic continues to represent an imminent threat to the life, health, and property of the City of Meridian and its citizens; and WHEREAS, a local disaster emergency, as defined in Section 46-1002, Idaho Code, continues to be in existence in the City of Meridian due to the imminent threat to life and property; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted the Mayor of the City of Meridian in Section 46- 1011, Idaho Code, the Mayor of the City of Meridian, on March 16, 2020, declared a local disaster emergency; and WHEREAS, on March 17, 2020 the City Council of the City of Meridian passed Resolution 20- 2195 authorizing the continuance of the local disaster emergency declaration for a period of thirty (30) days, expiring on April 16, 2020; and WHEREAS, it is deemed necessary by the Council of the City of Meridian to extend such local disaster emergency declaration for an additional thirty (30) days to provide for the ongoing response to the COVID-19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, Section 67-2808, Idaho Code, authorizes the Council of the City of Meridian to declare an emergency authorizing the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health or property; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Meridian deems it necessary for the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Meridian to continue the authorization for the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health and property; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That the Declaration of Local Disaster Emergency pursuant to Resolution 20-2195 shall remain in effect for an additional period of thirty (30) days from the effective date of this Resolution unless terminated, modified or unless extended for thirty (30) day increments. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONTINUANCE OF A DECLARATION OF LOCAL DISASTER EMERGENCY Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 22 of 242 Section 2. That the continued immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard the life, health and property of the City of Meridian is hereby authorized for an additional thirty (30) day increment. Section 3. That a copy of this resolution shall be promptly filed with the Ada County Recorder. Section 4. That this Resolution shall be effective on April 17, 2020. ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 14th day of April, 2020. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, this 14th day of April 2020. Robert E. Simison Mayor ATTEST: Chris Johnson City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) On this 14th day of April ,2020,before me,a Notary Public,personally appeared Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson,known or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk,respectively,of the City of Meridian,who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: Meridian, Idaho Commission expires: 3-28-2022 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONTINUANCE OF A DECLARATION OF LOCAL DISASTER EMERGENCY E IDIAN --- IDAHO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Agenda Item Number: 6 D Item Title: Meeting Notes: 4/14/2020 City of Meridian-Public Hearing Sign In Form Tools Details and Signatures For Public Hearing Hearing Date: 4/14/2020 Hearing Type: Council Item Number: 6-D Project Name: Proposed Parks and Recreation 2020 Summer Fee Schedule Project No.: Active: There are no signatures posted for this meeting type yet. Go Back To List Export To Excel ©2020 - City of Meridian, Idaho internalapps/SIGNINFORMTOOLS/SignlnFormDetails?id=453 1/1 (�E IDI y ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item - 6.D. Presenter: Jenna Fletcher, MPR Recreation Coordinator Estimated Time for Presentation: 5 minutes Title of Item - Public Hearing: Proposed 2020 Summer Fee Schedule of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department Click Here to Sign Up to Testify at Hearing- If you plan to provide a visual presentation, it must be sent via email to cityclerk@meridiancity.org before Noon on the day of the meeting. You must check the box on the sign up that you wish to join via Zoom. You will then be sent an email with the link to the meeting. Council Notes: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Upload Date Exhibit A cover sheet Exhibit 3/10/2020 MPR Dept 2020 Summer Fee Schedule and Resolution Exhibit 3/10/2020 REVIEWERS: Department Reviewer Action Date Clerk. Johnson, Chris Approved 4/7/2020 -6:51 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 24 of 242 Exhibit Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 25 of 242 CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT,BORTON,CAVENER, HOAGLUN,PERREAULT, STRADER A RESOLUTION ADOPTING NEW FEES OF THE MERIDIAN PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT; AUTHORIZING THE MERIDIAN PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO COLLECT SUCH FEES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, following publication of notice in the Meridian Press on March 20, 2020 and March 27, 2020, according to the requirements of Idaho Code section 63-1311A, on April 7, 2020 the City Council of the City of Meridian held a hearing on the adoption of proposed new fees of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department, as set forth in Exhibit A hereto; and WHEREAS, following such hearing, the City Council, by formal motion, did approve said proposed new fees of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department; NOW THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO: Section 1. That the 2020 Summer Fee Schedule of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department, as set forth in Exhibit A hereto, is hereby adopted. Section 2. That the fees adopted for the 2020 Summer Activity Guide shall remain in effect as to those classes until such classes are concluded, at which point the fees set forth in Exhibit A hereto shall supersede any and all fees for the enumerated services previously adopted. Section 3. That the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department is hereby authorized to implement and carry out the collection of said fees. Section 4. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this day of Apr. 2020. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this day of Apr. 2020. APPROVED: Robert Simison, Mayor ATTEST: Chris Johnson, City Clerk ADOPTION OF FEE SCHEDULE OF MERIDIAN PARKS&RECREATION DEPARTMENT PAGE 1 OF 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 26 of 242 CITY OF MERIDIAN NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN,pursuant to the ordinances of the City of Meridian and the laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 7, 2020, at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, regarding proposed new and amended fees as set forth below. Further information is available at the Parks&Recreation Department at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at the public hearing. Written testimony is welcome; written materials should be submitted to the City Clerk. All testimony and materials presented shall become property of the City of Meridian. For auditory, visual, or language accommodations, please contact the City Clerk's Office at (208) 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public hearing. Proposed new or amended fees: EXHIBIT A 2020 Summer Activily Guide Class Fees: Jazz/Ballet Classes: ages 2 — 3 $45.00 Jazz/Ballet Classes: ages 3 — 5 $52.00 Jazz/Ballet Classes: ages 5 —6 $52.00 Jazz/Lyrical Classes: ages 6— 13 $60.00 Ballet 1 $52.00 Ballet 2 $60.00 Ballet 3 $60.00 Hip Hop Classes: ages 5 —9 $52.00 Hip Hop Classes: ages 10 - 15 $60.00 Motions Medley Classes: ages 5 - 12 $52.00 Passport to Dance Classes: ages 4—6 $40.00 Ca oeira Class $40.00 Princess & Mermaid Dance Camps: ages 2—3 $35.00 Princess & Mermaid Dance Camps: ages 3 —6 $40.00 Motions Dairy Days Dancing Parade Cam $35.00 Motions Cheer: ages 3 - 7 $52.00 Motions Cheer: ages 6— 10 $60.00 Motions Cheer Intermediate $60.00 Cheer Team Fitness $60.00 Tumble & Twist Classes: ages 1.5 —2 $45.00 Tumble & Twist Classes: ages 3 — 5 $52.00 Tumble & Flip Classes: ages 6 & older, beginning $43.00 Tumble & Flip Classes: ages 6 & older, intermediate $48.00 Acro Dance & Tumbling $43.00 Just Dance. Inclusion Dance for all abilities $40.00 Amazing Athletes $64.00 Martial Arts for All Ages, Beginning & Intermed. /Advanc. $40.00 ADOPTION OF FEE SCHEDULE OF MERIDIAN PARKS&RECREATION DEPARTMENT PAGE 2 OF 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 27 of 242 Lego Cams $80.00-$85.00 Kendo-Japanese Fencing $70.00-$100.00 Introduction to the sport of Fencing $150.00 Outdoor Adventure Cam $185.00 Outdoor Adventure Camp: Jun 29-Jul 2 $148.00 Let's Play Sorts Cam $44.00 Let's Play Sorts Camp: Jun 29-Jul 2 $37.00 H.O.S.T. Basketball Cams $99.00 Tiny Tots Tennis Lessons $32.00 Junior Tennis Lessons $32.00 Camp Mer-IDA-Moo Full Da $99.00 Camp Mer-IDA-Moo Full Day: Jun 29-Jul 2 $79.00 Young Rembrandt Art Classes $55.00 - $110.00 Create Craft Studio Art Classes $20.00 - $55.00 Little Pallets Art Classes $50.00 Yoga-All Levels $48.00 Yoga-Gentle Yoga $48.00 Yoga-Beyond the Basics $48.00 Yoga-Unlimited Yoga $60.00 Somatic Yoga& Gentle Stretch $48.00 Intro to Yoga Workshop $10.00 Yoga&Painting $35.00 Jazzercise $52.00 H43 BootCamp $49.00 Pickeball 101 $60.00 Line Dancing-Beginner $15.00 - $25.00 Line Dancing-Intermediate $20.00 - $25.00 Line Dancing- 8 day option $30.00 Intermediate 2-step $50.00 - $60.00 Country Sampler $50.00 - $60.00 Digital Photography $60.00 The Photographers Eye $60.00 Adult Sports 4 v 4 Volle all League $50.00 3 v 3 Summer Basketball League $50.00 Men's & Coed Summer/Fall Softball League $300.00 Adult Flag Football League $425.00 Meridian Resident Fee $10.00 Non-Meridian Resident Fee $20.00 ADOPTION OF FEE SCHEDULE OF MERIDIAN PARKS&RECREATION DEPARTMENT PAGE 3 OF 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020- Page 28 of 242 DATED this day of , 2020. Chris Johnson, CITY CLERK PUBLISH on March 20 and March 27. ADOPTION OF FEE SCHEDULE OF MERIDIAN PARKS&RECREATION DEPARTMENT PAGE 4 OF 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 29 of 242 E IDIAN --- IDAHO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Agenda Item Number: 6 E Item Title: Meeting Notes: (�E IDI y ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item - 6.E. Presenter: Jenna Fletcher, MPR Recreation Coordinator Estimated Time for Presentation: 5 minutes Title of Item - Resolution No. 20-2192: A Resolution Adopting the Summer 2020 Fee Schedule of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department; Authorizing the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department to Collect Such Fees; and Providing an Effective Date Council Notes: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Upload Date MPR 2020 Summer Fee Schedule Resolution Resolution 3/27/2020 Exhibit A Exhibit 3/27/2020 REVIEWERS: Department Reviewer Action Date Johnson, Chris 4/7/2020 -6:51 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 30 of 242 CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 20-2192 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT,BORTON,CAVENER, HOAGLUN,PERREAULT, STRADER A RESOLUTION ADOPTING NEW FEES OF THE MERIDIAN PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT; AUTHORIZING THE MERIDIAN PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO COLLECT SUCH FEES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, following publication of notice in the Meridian Press on March 20, 2020 and March 27, 2020, according to the requirements of Idaho Code section 63-1311A, on April 7, 2020 the City Council of the City of Meridian held a hearing on the adoption of proposed new fees of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department, as set forth in Exhibit A hereto; and WHEREAS, following such hearing, the City Council,by formal motion, did approve said proposed new fees of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department; NOW THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That the 2020 Summer Fee Schedule of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department, as set forth in Exhibit A hereto, is hereby adopted. Section 2. That the fees adopted for the 2020 Summer Activity Guide shall remain in effect as to those classes until such classes are concluded, at which point the fees set forth in Exhibit A hereto shall supersede any and all fees for the enumerated services previously adopted. Section 3. That the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department is hereby authorized to implement and carry out the collection of said fees. Section 4. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 14th day of Apr. 2020. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 14th day of Apr. 2020. APPROVED: Robert E. Simison, Mayor Attest: Chris Johnson, City Clerk ADOPTION OF FEE SCHEDULE OF MERIDIAN PARKS&RECREATION DEPARTMENT PAGE 1 OF 4 CITY OF MERIDIAN NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN,pursuant to the ordinances of the City of Meridian and the laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 7, 2020, at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, regarding proposed new and amended fees as set forth below. Further information is available at the Parks&Recreation Department at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at the public hearing. Written testimony is welcome; written materials should be submitted to the City Clerk. All testimony and materials presented shall become property of the City of Meridian. For auditory, visual, or language accommodations, please contact the City Clerk's Office at (208) 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public hearing. Proposed new or amended fees: EXHIBIT A 2020 Summer Activily Guide Class Fees: Jazz/Ballet Classes: ages 2 — 3 $45.00 Jazz/Ballet Classes: ages 3 — 5 $52.00 Jazz/Ballet Classes: ages 5 —6 $52.00 Jazz/Lyrical Classes: ages 6— 13 $60.00 Ballet 1 $52.00 Ballet 2 $60.00 Ballet 3 $60.00 Hip Hop Classes: ages 5 —9 $52.00 Hip Hop Classes: ages 10 - 15 $60.00 Motions Medley Classes: ages 5 - 12 $52.00 Passport to Dance Classes: ages 4—6 $40.00 Ca oeira Class $40.00 Princess & Mermaid Dance Camps: ages 2—3 $35.00 Princess & Mermaid Dance Camps: ages 3 —6 $40.00 Motions Dairy Days Dancing Parade Cam $35.00 Motions Cheer: ages 3 - 7 $52.00 Motions Cheer: ages 6— 10 $60.00 Motions Cheer Intermediate $60.00 Cheer Team Fitness $60.00 Tumble & Twist Classes: ages 1.5 —2 $45.00 Tumble & Twist Classes: ages 3 — 5 $52.00 Tumble & Flip Classes: ages 6 & older, beginning $43.00 Tumble & Flip Classes: ages 6 & older, intermediate $48.00 Acro Dance & Tumbling $43.00 Just Dance. Inclusion Dance for all abilities $40.00 Amazing Athletes $64.00 Martial Arts for All Ages, Beginning & Intermed. /Advanc. $40.00 ADOPTION OF FEE SCHEDULE OF MERIDIAN PARKS&RECREATION DEPARTMENT PAGE 2 OF 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 32 of 242 Lego Cams $80.00-$85.00 Kendo-Japanese Fencing $70.00-$100.00 Introduction to the sport of Fencing $150.00 Outdoor Adventure Cam $185.00 Outdoor Adventure Camp: Jun 29-Jul 2 $148.00 Let's Play Sorts Cam $44.00 Let's Play Sorts Camp: Jun 29-Jul 2 $37.00 H.O.S.T. Basketball Cams $99.00 Tiny Tots Tennis Lessons $32.00 Junior Tennis Lessons $32.00 Camp Mer-IDA-Moo Full Da $99.00 Camp Mer-IDA-Moo Full Day: Jun 29-Jul 2 $79.00 Young Rembrandt Art Classes $55.00 - $110.00 Create Craft Studio Art Classes $20.00 - $55.00 Little Pallets Art Classes $50.00 Yoga-All Levels $48.00 Yoga-Gentle Yoga $48.00 Yoga-Beyond the Basics $48.00 Yoga-Unlimited Yoga $60.00 Somatic Yoga& Gentle Stretch $48.00 Intro to Yoga Workshop $10.00 Yoga&Painting $35.00 Jazzercise $52.00 H43 BootCamp $49.00 Pickeball 101 $60.00 Line Dancing-Beginner $15.00 - $25.00 Line Dancing-Intermediate $20.00 - $25.00 Line Dancing- 8 day option $30.00 Intermediate 2-step $50.00 - $60.00 Country Sampler $50.00 - $60.00 Digital Photography $60.00 The Photographers Eye $60.00 Adult Sports 4 v 4 Volle all League $50.00 3 v 3 Summer Basketball League $50.00 Men's & Coed Summer/Fall Softball League $300.00 Adult Flag Football League $425.00 Meridian Resident Fee $10.00 Non-Meridian Resident Fee $20.00 ADOPTION OF FEE SCHEDULE OF MERIDIAN PARKS&RECREATION DEPARTMENT PAGE 3 OF 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020- Page 33 of 242 DATED this day of , 2020. Chris Johnson, CITY CLERK PUBLISH on March 20 and March 27. ADOPTION OF FEE SCHEDULE OF MERIDIAN PARKS&RECREATION DEPARTMENT PAGE 4 OF 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 34 of 242 Exhibit Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 35 of 242 E IDIAN --- IDAHO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Agenda Item Number: 6 F Item Title: Meeting Notes: (�E IDI y ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item - 6.F. Presenter: Crystal Campbell Estimated Time for Presentation: 15 Title of Item - Public Hearing: Community Development Block Grant Program Year 2019 Action Plan Amendment Meridian Community Development Block Grant Program Website PY19 Action Plan Amendment Presentation Click Here to Sign Up to Testify at Hearing- If you plan to provide a visual presentation, it must be sent via email to cityclerk@meridiancity.org before Noon on the day of the meeting. You must check the box on the sign up that you wish to join via Zoom. You will then be sent an email with the link to the meeting. Council Notes: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Upload Date CDBG Action Plan (Revised) Cover Memo 4/10/2020 REVIEWERS: Department Reviewer Action Date Clerk. Johnson, Chris Approved 4/7/2020 -6:51 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 36 of 242 OctoberACTION P LAN __ 11 j AR ant 'mow •z,' ,. _ ';�. a rC`t3f'! s a- rL' yr�y 4} �L J�LJ ixr a PREPARES BY Crystal Campbell eearr�p�ell@meridiancity.org �a a►�o httpsJf m eri di antity.orglcd�gf Meridian . .Agenda L• Page 37 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan Contents ExecutiveSummary.......................................................................................................................................1 AP-05 Executive Summary- 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) ........................................................................1 PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies—91.200(b)......................................................................................4 AP-10 Consultation—91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(I)...................................................................................5 AP-12 Participation—91.105, 91.200(c) .................................................................................................18 ExpectedResources....................................................................................................................................22 AP-15 Expected Resources—91.220(c)(1,2)...........................................................................................22 AnnualGoals and Objectives......................................................................................................................25 AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives........................................................................................................25 AP-35 Projects—91.220(d) .....................................................................................................................28 AP-38 Project Summary..........................................................................................................................29 AP-50 Geographic Distribution—91.220(f).............................................................................................35 AffordableHousing.....................................................................................................................................36 AP-55 Affordable Housing—91.220(g) ...................................................................................................36 AP-60 Public Housing—91.220(h)...........................................................................................................37 AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities—91.220(i)............................................................39 AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing—91.220(j)...................................................................................42 AP-85 Other Actions—91.220(k) ............................................................................................................43 Program Specific Requirements..................................................................................................................46 AP-90 Program Specific Requirements—91.220(I)(1,2,4) ......................................................................46 Attachments................................................................................................................................................47 Citizen Participation Comments .............................................................................................................48 PY19Action Plan.................................................................................................................................48 PY19 Action Plan Amendment............................................................................................................48 Grantee Unique Appendices...............................................................................................................5049 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 38 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan Consolidated Plan and Fair Housing Assessment...........................................................................5049 PublicNotice...................................................................................................................................6362 Resolution.......................................................................................................................................686-7 SF 424's and Certifications..................................................................................................................7069 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 39 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan Executive Summary AP-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) 1. Introduction The City of Meridian was designated an Entitlement Community by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD) in 2007.This designation allows the City to receive funds directly from HUD's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program on an annual basis.The City is currently working under the regulatory Five-Year Consolidated Plan (Con Plan) for program years 2017-2021.The Con Plan describes the anticipated strategies, goals, and community development needs identified during a collaborative process that included input from community members and local entities. This Action Plan is for the third year of the 2017-2021 Con Plan and will provide direction to the City of Meridian CDBG Program (Program) for Program Year 2019 (PY19) which spans from October 1, 2019— September 30, 2020.The PY19 Action Plan provides a summary of the actions, activities, and resources that will be used during PY19 to address the goals and priority needs identified in the 2017-2021 Con Plan. 2. Summarize the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan The City is focusing its activities and funding during PY19 on 1) improving accessibility, 2) enhancing homeownership opportunities, 3) promoting fair housing,a44d-4) providing social services to Meridian LMI residents, and 5)stabilizing the rental gap. To improve accessibility the City will previde funding to the M r;, an Deyek,^.,- eRt CE)rpE)F@tiE)R (MDC) ert) alens€.Third Street ;n ^^,•,^*^,•,n ""or;d; ^ coordinate with the Parks and Recreation Department to connect the Five Mile Creek Pathway to Lakes Place, improving access and safety for pedestrians. City staff will also coordinate with the Public Works Department to upgrade/install streetlights along walking routes to Meridian schools.These activities will improve the public infrastructure to increase the ease of access for all Meridian residents. To enhance homeownership opportunities the City will provide funding to the Ada County Housing Authority(ACHA)to supplement the down payment and closing costs associated with purchasing a home in Meridian for first-time homebuyers.This assistance combined with financial education will allow eligible households with a low-to moderate-income (LMI) overcome their financial barriers and access permanent housing they can afford. To promote fair housing the City will collaborate with the Cities of Boise, Caldwell, and Nampa to educate the community on fair housing. This collaboration has a dual purpose, which benefits both residents and housing providers. Residents are informed of their rights and how to recognize and report possible discrimination. The other purpose is to be proactive by educating housing providers of their legal obligations to provide fair housing as well as the benefits of expanding fair housing choice. City of Meridian P a g e l Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 40 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan To provide social services the City will provide funding to The- '^«^Tree of Idaho t^ provide ^^^-t m^ the Boys &Girls Club to provide scholarships for children to participate in extended care programs; and CATCH Ine to hem^'^«^^« ^dl have - MeRtal health direreler. These This projects wasere selected to provide stability with wrap-around services that offer childcare for caregivers to work,fiY.aneial stability fer thA1.,y.ghA R4 n.d . rt-,I *IstaACee f.,rth.,ss., .0 n A . d To stabilize the rental gap the City will provide funding to Jesse Tree and CATCH to provide emergency assistance to Meridian residents who are at immediate risk of homelessness. This protect will allow households to remain housed and improve their chances of stability. 3. Evaluation of past performance Since 2007, Meridian has successfully managed over$3.5 million in resources from its annual CDBG allocation. Over these 12 years, the City's expenditures from its CDBG allocation have focused on supporting social service provider operations such as the Meridian Food Bank, improving community facilities for organizations such as the Boys and Girls Club and Meridian Development Corporation; addressing accessibility barriers to places such as parks and trails, Meridian Libraries, and sidewalk projects; preventing homelessness with emergency assistance through The Jesse Tree of Idaho; and assisting with homeownership attainment for low-and moderate-income buyers through the Ada County Housing Authority and NeighborWorks Boise. The City successfully produced Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Reports (CAPERS) for all previous program years.The CAPERS demonstrated that over 90 percent of the funds expended during the previous program years were invested in activities benefiting low to moderate-income individuals and families, which is well over the 70 percent statutory minimum requirement. Aside from Program Year 2016,the City has met its expenditure of grant funds deadlines imposed by HUD each year. All of the prior program years' activities meet critical needs in Meridian. The primary challenges encountered during the last Consolidated Plan period were timing- and contact-related.To address these challenges,the City has implemented more stringent requirements for subrecipients, particularly in meeting expected schedules. Over the last 18 months,the City has been effective at organizing, streamlining, and managing its CDBG processes to provide the most benefit for each CDBG dollar granted while complying with federal timeliness requirements. 4. Summary of Citizen Participation Process and consultation process The citizen participation process for the PY19 Action Plan followed the process identified in the City's Citizen Participation Plan, adopted with the 2017-2021 Con Plan. Public comments were accepted from May 31, 2019 to July 16, 2019 with a public hearing being held on July 16, 2019.The City published legal notices in two local newspapers (Idaho Statesman and Meridian Press Tribune—formerly the Valley Times) and posted the draft Action Plan on the City's website on May 31, 2019. Presentations of the draft Action Plan and included projects were provided to the public and City Council on May 7, 2019, City of Meridian P a g e 12 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 41 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan June 4, 2019, and July 16, 2019.The one comment that was received was reviewed, responded to, and included as an attachment to this plan. To broaden public participation in the development of the plan,the City coordinated with several organizations that work with LMI populations to gain a better understanding of the community needs and identify projects that would be beneficial to the residents of Meridian.The feedback received supported the goals and strategies identified in the 2017-2021 Con Plan. Invitations to apply were provided through e-mails, phone calls, and publication announcements on the City website, Boise City/Ada County Continuum of Care (CoC) distribution list, Region 4 Behavioral Health Board distribution list, and in the local newspaper. 5. Summary of public comments One comment was received from Councilman Borton regarding default rates during the lifetime of our Homeownership Assistance Program. There have been no defaults. 6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them N/A 7. Summary The City of Meridian has collaborated with stakeholders throughout the community to develop the PY19 Action Plan in a manner that is consistent with the goals and strategies identified in the 2017-2021 Con Plan, which remains relevant to the current needs of the community. The City plans to continue improving the Program based on feedback from the community to ensure the intent of the Program continues to be met. City of Meridian P a g e 13 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 42 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies —91.200(b) 1. Agency/entity responsible for preparing/administering the Consolidated Plan Describe the agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source. Agency Role Name Department/Agency CDBG Administrator MERIDIAN Planning Division, Community Development Dept. Table 1—Responsible Agencies Narrative (optional) The Meridian CDBG Program is part of the City of Meridian's Community Development Department and falls under the Planning Division. The Program works closely with Planning Division staff and Economic Development Division staff as well as other Departments in the City such as Public Works, Finance, and Parks and Recreation. Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information Crystal Campbell, Community Development Program Coordinator Community Development Department City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 208-489-0575 City of Meridian P a g e 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 43 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan AP-10 Consultation —91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(I) 1. Introduction The City of Meridian engages stakeholders via social media, email, and the City's website. Community stakeholders include, but are not limited to: citizens of Meridian; current and past CDBG subrecipients; Idaho Housing and Finance Association (IHFA); Idaho Department of Health and Welfare (Divisions of Behavioral Health, Medicaid, and Public Health); Central District Health Department; Meridian Downtown Business Association; Region 4 Behavioral Health Board; Our Path Home (coordinated entry); Region 4 Crisis Center; and Boise City/Ada County Continuum of Care (CoC). Agencies were identified for participation in the PY19 Meridian CDBG competitive application based on the needs and priorities identified during the 2017-2021 Con Plan planning process. Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction's activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(1)) The City collaborated with the Ada County Housing Authority (ACHA), which is the local public housing authority, to assist the City in better understanding ACHA's resources and needs. While there are no public housing units in Meridian, an estimated 10 percent of the housing authority's total voucher supply are used within Meridian City limits. ACHA and the City are both regularly involved with the CoC.The CoC meetings provide an opportunity to collaborate with regional and local housing providers (public, nonprofit, and private) and health and social service agencies(including private and non-profit mental health, emergency, and healthcare providers). During PY18 the City and CoC connected with the Region 4 Behavioral Health Board (BHB), a government entity established by the State of Idaho in coordination with Idaho Health and Welfare.The BHB advises the State Behavioral Health Authority and the State Planning Council of the needs in this region and is facilitated by Central District Health Department (CDHD).This collaboration provides access to a large number of agencies and citizens with expertise in mental health services, substance use disorders, law enforcement, education, and healthcare.The CoC Program Manager and City staff continue to be involved with the BHB to identify ways to enhance coordination between ACHA and healthcare providers, mental health services, and other supportive service agencies. CDHD also provides information related to housing units in which children have been identified as being lead poisoned concerning lead-based paint hazards, but since the majority of houses in Meridian were built after 1980 this has not been a concern. Additionally,the City is undertaking efforts as part of its internal strategic plan to develop a socioeconomic profile of Meridian that will identify gaps in service, likely partnerships, and needs of the community.The City is dedicated to extending further support to organizations that helps meet the identified needs of the community. One need that is readily apparent is the need for affordable housing and rental support. Meridian is dedicated to increasing its affordable housing inventory to ensure residents of all income levels can find housing in Meridian and to providing necessary supportive City of Meridian P a g e 15 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 44 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan services. City staff will continue to stay engaged with the affordable housing and supportive service community to ensure the City provides important tools and resources to affordable housing developers and supportive service providers. Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families,families with children,veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness. The City participates in the CoC, which includes staff members from neighboring communities along with healthcare,foster care and other youth programs, mental health providers,Ada County Sheriff, Boise Police Department and Idaho Department of Juvenile Corrections. CoC efforts have resulted in the launch of Coordinated Entry.This single point of entry for homeless households reduces the duplication gathering household information, care provided by agencies; while prioritizing housing and supportive service needs. The involvement of foster care and other youth programs has encouraged the City to further evaluate the non-traditional homelessness experienced by youth and their families in Meridian. The City has also updated internal policies to include a representative from the CoC in the CDBG Scoring Committee,which reviews applications for CDBG funding and recommends projects to be funded.This collaboration provides an opportunity to involve the CoC in the planning process and identify projects that will address the needs of those who are currently or at risk of homelessness. Additionally,the City acts as a liaison between the Behavioral Health Board (BHB) and the Continuum of Care. The BHB is facilitated by the Central District Health Department and composed of 23 stakeholders, advocates, and professionals including the Idaho Department of Corrections for adults, Boise Police Department, Adult Mental Health staff that are responsible for discharging participants from state run psychiatric facilities, and Children's Mental Health staff that works with families in crisis. Involvement with this group allows the City to understand the broader needs of the community as related to behavioral health in general and specifically for those who are being discharged from institutional settings such as mental health facilities and corrections programs. Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards for and evaluate outcomes of projects and activities assisted by ESG funds, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the operation and administration of HMIS The City of Meridian does not receive ESG funds. Allocation of ESG is discussed at the CoC meetings, which Meridian staff attend. Meridian's lack of emergency shelters and demonstrated experience with rapid rehousing programs puts the City at a disadvantage for ESG funds.The City continues its work with the Executive and Data and Performance Management Committees of the CoC to provide feedback on changes to the HMIS and data management process of the CoC. 2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdiction's consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities City of Meridian 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 45 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan Table 2—Agencies,groups,organizations who participated 1 Agency/Group/Organization Boise City/Ada County Continuum of Care Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing PHA Services—Housing Services—Children Services—Elderly Persons Services—Victims of Domestic Violence Services-homeless Services—Health Services—Education Services Employment Services—Fair Housing Services—Victims Health Agency Child Welfare Agency Publicly Funded Institution/System of Care Other government—State Other government—Local Regional organization Planning organization City of Meridian P a g e 7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 46 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs-Chronically homeless Consultation? Homeless Needs- Families with children Homelessness Needs-Veterans Homelessness Needs- Unaccompanied youth Homelessness Strategy Briefly describe how the The CoC was consulted as part of the 2017 Consolidated Planning efforts as well as Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.What during the current action planning efforts. Members of this group represent all of are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation the agency/group/organization types listed above and assists the City in or areas for improved coordination? understanding the needs of the community as it relates to housing, homelessness, and fair housing. This consultation was effective in helping the City develop funding recommendations to address homelessness, homelessness prevention, and fair housing activities. 2 Agency/Group/Organization ACHA Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing PHA Services- Housing Regional organization What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment Consultation? Public Housing Needs Homeless Needs-Chronically homeless Homeless Needs- Families with children Homelessness Needs-Veterans Homelessness Needs- Unaccompanied youth Homelessness Strategy Non-Homeless Special Needs HOPWA Strategy Market Analysis City of Meridian P a g e 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 47 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan Briefly describe how the ACHA was contacted by the City to discuss the viability of its homebuyer Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.What assistance program in the midst of a difficult housing market.These discussions are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation helped the City develop funding recommendation for continuing to provide CDBG or areas for improved coordination? dollars to ACHA for down payment assistance.This consultation also led to a discussion about housing development and policies that may change how the City interacts and funds these efforts in the future. 3 Agency/Group/Organization West Ada School District No.2 Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-homeless Services-Health Services-Education Publicly Funded Institution/System of Care What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs- Families with children Consultation? Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth Homelessness Strategy Non-Homeless Special Needs Briefly describe how the The City discussed the needs of homeless and unaccompanied youth in Meridian's Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.What public education system with the West Ada School District. Conversations led to are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation the City's understanding of the number of unaccompanied youth in the school or areas for improved coordination? system with relatively limited resources and services available to these students and their families.The City identified gaps in services and will continue to work with the West Ada School District to develop a plan to fill those gaps. 4 Agency/Group/Organization CATCH, INC. Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing Services- Housing Services-homeless City of Meridian P a g e 9 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 48 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment Consultation? Homeless Needs-Chronically homeless Homeless Needs- Families with children Homelessness Needs-Veterans Homelessness Needs- Unaccompanied youth Homelessness Strategy Non-Homeless Special Needs Briefly describe how the The City meets often with CATCH to discuss the state of homelessness in Meridian. Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.What CATCH currently houses the coordinated entry efforts of the County and is are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation tracking data related to Meridian's homeless population.These consultations or areas for improved coordination? clarify the need for certain support in Meridian and helping to develop a short- and long-term strategy to meet the needs of those experiencing homelessness in Meridian and across the County. During the coming year the City will provide funding to CATCH to administer a program which provides care coordination and a fast-track process to access SSI/SSDI for those experiencing homelessness who have a disability. 5 Agency/Group/Organization City of Meridian Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government- Local Planning organization Civic Leaders Grantee Department What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment Consultation? Market Analysis Economic Development Anti-poverty Strategy City of Meridian P a g e 10 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 49 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan Briefly describe how the The City regularly consults with the Mayor's Office, Department of Community Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.What Development, Planning Division, Economic Development officials, Finance are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation Department, Public Works Department, and law enforcement officials to explore or areas for improved coordination? and operationalize the needs of community members in Meridian. Much of the conversation during the consultations surrounding the Action Plan deals with housing needs,wage growth, vacancy and affordability rates of housing, identifying households and areas that may be affected by lead-based paint requirements, and work to address poverty in the community. Many of these conversations are still in their preliminary stage and have not directly created outcomes or improved coordination, but work continues to plan and strategize to develop 1) incentives for affordable housing development; 2) partnerships to address service gaps in Meridian; 3) a clear plan/strategy to increase workforce housing developments; 4) a new City Comprehensive Plan that better-addresses and plans for the needs of LMI residents, including those experiencing homelessness; and 5) a socioeconomic profile of the City. All of these will offer insight, strategy, and structure to the City's community development efforts in the coming years. 6 Agency/Group/Organization THE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO, INC. Agency/Group/Organization Type Services- Housing Services-homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Non-Homeless Special Needs Consultation? Briefly describe how the The Jesse Tree was consulted to discuss the possibility to expand their emergency Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.What rental assistance program in Meridian.They provided insights and clarity into the are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation need for their program due to continually rising rents across the City.This or areas for improved coordination? consultation contributed to an expansion of CDBG funding that will be given to this organization for homelessness prevention services. City of Meridian P a g e 11 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 50 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan 7 Agency/Group/Organization MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Agency/Group/Organization Type Publicly Funded Institution/System of Care Other government- Local What section of the Plan was addressed by Slum and Blight Strategy Consultation? Briefly describe how the The local urban redevelopment agency was consulted regarding the priority slum Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. What and blight needs in the City's redevelopment areas and the people in these areas are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation that are affected. These consultations helped inform the priorities and decisions or areas for improved coordination? for funding given to slum and blight projects for PY19. 8 Agency/Group/Organization UNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY Agency/Group/Organization Type Planning organization Foundation What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment Consultation? Anti-poverty Strategy Briefly describe how the The United Way was consulted in efforts to create a Socioeconomic Profile of Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. What Meridian in an effort to better understand the housing, transportation, health, are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation food, financial, and education needs of Meridian's residents. This partnership is or areas for improved coordination? ongoing and will likely result in funding provided to the City by this organization to conduct research and create plans to understand and meet these needs. 9 Agency/Group/Organization City of Boise Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government- Local City of Meridian P a g e 1 12 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 51 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan What section of the Plan was addressed by Homelessness Strategy Consultation? Non-Homeless Special Needs Market Analysis Economic Development Anti-poverty Strategy Administrative Briefly describe how the The City regularly consults with the City of Boise to ensure that funding Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. What recommendations, administrative practices, and other activities are compliant are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation with federal regulations. The coordination also reflects a shared goal to ensure or areas for improved coordination? that all activities undertaken with CDBG funds work to meet regional needs as well as local needs. 10 Agency/Group/Organization Neighborworks Boise Agency/Group/Organization Type Services- Housing Service-Fair Housing Major Employer What section of the Plan was addressed by Homelessness Strategy Consultation? Non-Homeless Special Needs Briefly describe how the The City worked with NeighborWorks Boise to discuss the viability of a Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. What homeowner rehabilitation program in Meridian. NeighborWorks was not able to are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation develop a program in time to apply for PY19 funding, but plans to work with the or areas for improved coordination? City during PY19 to explore this opportunity. 11 Agency/Group/Organization Idaho Fair Housing Forum Agency/Group/Organization Type Service-Fair Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Fair Housing Consultation? City of Meridian P a g e 1 13 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 52 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan Briefly describe how the The City meets with this group to consult on how to advance the fair housing work Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.What of the City and region.These consultations have brought forth fair housing are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation trainings and conferences educating over 1000 people about fair housing law and or areas for improved coordination? practice.These meetings also inform how the City will implement its strategies to affirmatively further fair housing. 12 Agency/Group/Organization Neighbors United Collaborative Agency/Group/Organization Type Services- Housing Services-Health Services-Education Services-Employment Service-Fair Housing Services- Refugees What section of the Plan was addressed by Non-Homeless Special Needs Consultation? Fair Housing Briefly describe how the The City regularly consults with this group to understand how to address the Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.What needs of LMI refugees in Meridian. Much of the discussion leading up to the are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation development of this Annual Action Plan has been around fair housing and or areas for improved coordination? language access services in the community.The City is working with this and other groups to develop resources and materials that can better educate about fair housing best practices while providing refugees and others facing housing discrimination support to overcome negative situations. 13 Agency/Group/Organization Idaho Apartment Association Agency/Group/Organization Type Services- Housing Business Leaders What section of the Plan was addressed by Non-Homeless Special Needs Consultation? Fair Housing City of Meridian P a g e 1 14 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 53 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan Briefly describe how the The City consults, as needed,with this organization to get the private-sector Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.What perspective on micro and macro issues in the world of housing and fair housing. are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation These consultations have often informed the conversations and decisions taken to or areas for improved coordination? and made by Neighbors United, Idaho Fair Housing Forum, and the CoC's Fair Housing Subcommittee. 14 Agency/Group/Organization Region 4 Behavioral Health Board Agency/Group/Organization Type Services—Housing Services—Children Services—Elderly Persons Services—Persons with Disabilities Services—Victims of Domestic Violence Services—Health Services—Education Services—Victims Health Agency Child Welfare Agency Publicly Funded Institution/System of Care Other government—State Other government—Local Regional organization Planning organization Business Leaders Civic Leaders City of Meridian P a g e 15 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 54 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan What section of the Plan was addressed by Non-Homeless Special Needs Consultation? Briefly describe how the The BHB was consulted as part of the current action planning efforts. Members of Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.What this group represent all of the agency/group/organization types listed above and are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation assists the City in understanding the needs of the community as it relates to or areas for improved coordination? people with mental health and substance use disorders.This consultation was effective in helping the City develop funding recommendations to address economic stability for people with disabilities. Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting Not applicable; every agency identified was offered an opportunity to participate in the development of the plan. While no agencies were left out,the City does not have a citizen's advisory group to consult with. Citizen's are requested to participate in public hearings and public presentations via social media and local newspapers, but there is no formal group. To gather citizen input specific to the slum and blighted area where CDBG funds are to be used,the City contacted residents who live in that area directly while the Redevelopment Plan was being developed and again when the Redevelopment Plan was being approved. Residents were also informed of the potential projects in this area during the development of the plan as well as the CDBG process of selecting projects annually. Invitations for public presentations related to the Action Plan and Project Applications were then sent out by email and social media. During PY19 the City would like to formalize a citizen participation group that will be actively involved in providing feedback on the direction of Meridian's CDBG program. In PY19,the City would like to improve its coordination with housing developers, particularly those developers who specialize in the development of workforce and affordable housing. Increased efforts were not made this year to reach out to these groups as the City is still working to develop internal strategies and plans about how it wants to address the affordable housing needs in the community and how to engage developers in that process.The City is also developing a new Comprehensive Plan that includes consultants doing consultations in the coming months.The decision was made to couple the needed consultation efforts of these Community Development activities with comprehensive planning consultation activities. City of Meridian P a g e 1 16 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 55 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan Name of Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of each plan? The City maintains goals of improving economic outcomes of low income residents, Idaho Housing and providing emergency rental assistance, and improving housing options and social and Continuum of Care Finance Association,Ada supportive services for people including but not limited to people with special needs and County, City of Boise individuals/families leaving domestic violence situations.These will contribute to the CoC objective of Ending Chronic Homelessness by preventing Meridian residents from falling into homelessness. Idaho Housing and The fair housing strategies established for Meridian considered opportunities to State of Idaho Finance Association; collaborate with the State.The City regularly involves representatives from IHFA, City of Analysis of Idaho Department of Boise, City of Nampa, City of Caldwell, and Idaho Department of Commerce in the Impediments Commerce planning,funding, and implementation efforts of fair housing activities in the region and state. Meridian Meridian Planning The City Comprehensive Plan was consulted during preparation of the Consolidated Plan Comprehensive Plan Division to ensure goals were consistent with the needs and desires of the community. Land use and zoning regulations were reviewed to assess barriers to housing choice. ACHA Policies and ACHA The housing authority policies and procedures were reviewed to ensure they support Procedures housing choice and address the greatest needs of low income residents. Table 3—Other local/regional/federal planning efforts Narrative (optional) The City is working with various stakeholders throughout the region to develop a comprehensive Action Plan, which will improve collaboration between entities,thereby reducing the duplication of efforts and using limited time and resources more effectively. City of Meridian P a g e 1 17 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 56 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan AP-12 Participation — 91.105, 91.200(c) 1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal-setting In 2017,the City completed an extensive citizen participation procedure to gain public guidance and information for the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan.The findings of those efforts have informed the priorities, needs, and goals entirely. During the consolidated planning process,the feedback received from public surveys, stakeholder interviews, and other public feedback created the framework for which all CDBG goals and action plans will be based on.The City has the goal to use the public feedback from the Con Plan to inform funding decisions proposed in this and subsequent annual action plans. In addition to the consolidated plan citizen participation processes,the City has undergone all federally required citizen participation requirements for this action plan.The City encouraged participation in developing and implementing the plan with not only low-and moderate-income persons but also with local and regional institutions,the Continuum of Care, businesses, developers, non-profits, community members, and faith based organizations.These include a minimum 30-day public comment period with a formal public hearing during that comment period.The City published legal notices in two local newspapers (Idaho Statesman and Meridian Press) and posted the PY19 Draft Action Plan on the City's website. Staff worked with the City's Communication Department to share information regarding the recommended projects and priorities for the upcoming year as well as the public comment period and public hearing.The Communication Department shares information via Facebook,Twitter, Instagram, Linkedln, Nextdoor, and a City-wide distribution list. CDBG staff also maintains a distribution list specific to those who have shown interest in CDBG and the same information was sent to that distribution list as well as several partner organizations distribution lists.All comments received were reviewed, acknowledged, and included as an attachment to this plan. The CDBG Scoring Committee was responsible for scoring, ranking, and providing funding recommendations for all applications submitted.This Committee consisted of the following representatives: • Four (4) Meridian residents; • Two (2) Finance Department staff; • One (1) City Council member; • One (1) CoC member; • One (1) Community Development Department staff; and • One (1) Mayor's Office staff. This multi-perspective approach to project funding recommendations allows the City to incorporate the viewpoints of a wide representation of interests throughout the community to better embody the needs of Meridian.The largest representation was intentionally Meridian residents to encourage the public to more actively participate in determining the path of the Program in the coming year.The CDBG Scoring Committee reviewed and discussed the merits of all grant applications to develop the final recommendations for funding included in this action plan. City of Meridian P a g e 1 18 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 57 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan Citizen Participation Outreach Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of Summary of Summary of comments URL(If response/attendance comments received not accepted applicable) and reasons Non- A public hearing was held at the City 1 Public Hearing targeted/broad N/A N/A community Council meeting on July 16. Public meetings were held during City Council meetings on May 7 and June 4. These meetings One comment was included received from presentations that Councilman Borton outlined the regarding default Non- applications received, rates during the 2 Public Meeting targeted/broad funding lifetime of our N/A community recommendations, Homeownership specific projects, Assistance presentations by Program. There recommended have been no potential defaults. subrecipients, and discussion by Council on the proposed projects. City of Meridian P a g e 19 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 58 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of Summary of Summary of comments URL(If response/attendance comments received not accepted applicable) and reasons Legal notices were N/A N/A published in the Idaho Statesman and Meridian Press Non- Tribune newspapers 3 Newspaper Ad targeted/broad on May 31 that community described the public presentations, comment period, and hearing regarding this plan. Notices of the public N/A N/A comment period and Non- public hearing were 4 Internet Outreach targeted/broad sent out using the community City's social media accounts (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Linkedln, Nextdoor). City of Meridian P a g e 20 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 59 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of Summary of Summary of comments URL(If response/attendance comments received not accepted applicable) and reasons Minorities N/A N/A Notices of the public Persons with comment period and disabilities public hearing were sent out using Non- multiple distribution 5 Email targeted/broad lists including that of the Meridian CDBG community Program, Mayor's Residents of Public Office, Behavioral and Assisted Health Board, CoC and ACHA. Housing Minorities N/A N/A Flyers advertising the Persons with public comment disabilities period and public hearing were Non- distributed to 6 Flyers targeted/broad subrecipients to community display to customers, potential customers, Residents of Public and other and Assisted stakeholders. Housing Table 4—Citizen Participation Outreach City of Meridian P a g e 21 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 60 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan Expected Resources AP-15 Expected Resources —91.220(c)(1,2) Introduction The City of Meridian anticipated receiving$424,162 in CDBG funds for PY19 and will leverage staff time to complete projects implemented by the City. The majority of CDBG projects are implemented by subrecipients and the City expects funds to be leveraged with CDBG funds to improve the outcome of the project. The City has the following prior year resources totaling$69,376.01: • ACHA (IDIS#93) $10,000— participants had difficulty locating affordable homes that were not outbid by other homebuyers. • Admin and Fair Housing (IDIS#94) $25,700.10—the City required less funding than anticipated. • Meridian Library (IDIS#99) $18,254—completed under budget. • Crestwood/Fenway Streetlights (IDIS #100) $15,421.91—completed under budget. Reallocated funds will go toward PY18 Chateau/Chief Joseph Streetlights (IDIS#92), PY19 Fairview Ave Sidewalk Connection, and additional administrative costs. City of Meridian P a g e 122 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 61 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan Anticipated Resources Program Source of Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Narrative Description Funds Annual Program Prior Year Total: Amount Allocation: Income: Resources: $ Available $ $ $ Remainder of ConPlan CDBG public- Acquisition The City has allocated all prior year federal Admin and funding and expects to receive around Planning $400,000 for each of the remaining Economic two years of the Con Plan. Development Housing Public Improvements Public Services 424,162 0 069,376 424,162 800,000 Table 5-Expected Resources—Priority Table City of Meridian P a g e 123 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 62 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied The City of Meridian does not receive funding for HUD programs other than CDBG and there are no additional state or federal funds available to leverage for program activities.The City does use local funds to leverage staff time to implement all CDBG activities. The projects identified below anticipates leveraging the following resources: • ACHA—local and federal funds for staff time to administer the homeownership program and to assist with ongoing mortgages for those who qualify; • Boys& Girls Club—private funds to administer the scholarship program and provide additional scholarships to those who are unable to access CDBG funding; • CATCH, Inc.—private funds to administer the program; • City of Meridian—local funds to pay staff salaries; d • The Jesse Tree of Idaho—private funds will be used to administer the program and provide additional assistance to those who are unable to access CDBG funding. If appropriate, describe publically owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan There are currently no publically owned lands within Meridian that have been identified to specifically address needs of the Con Plan or the Action Plan. Discussion The City and its subrecipients will work to leverage funding and in-kind resources to help maximize the usage of CDBG funding. City of Meridian P a g e 124 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 63 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan Annual Goals and Objectives AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives Goals Summary Information Sort Goal Name Start End Category Geographic Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator Order Year Year Area 1 Improve 2017 2021 Non- Better Accessibility in CDBG: Public Facility or Infrastructure Accessibility Homeless Meridian $4-295,662 Activities other than Special Improve Accessibility Low/Moderate Income Needs in Meridian Housing Benefit:86&5,474 Persons Assisted 2 Enhance 2017 2021 Affordable Homeownership CDBG: $40,000 Direct Financial Assistance to Homeownership Housing Opportunities: 80-120 Homebuyers: 4 Households Opportunities Percent of AMI Assisted Down Payment Assistance Opportunities 3 Administration and 2017 2021 Admin CDBG: $4-35,000 Other: 0 Other Fair Housing Activities City of Meridian P a g e 125 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 64 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan Sort Goal Name Start End Category Geographic Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator Order Year Year Area 4 Provide Social 2017 2021 Non- Improvements in CDBG: Public service activities other Services Homeless Economic Stability $93,99913,000 than Low/Moderate Income Special Homeownership Housing Benefit: 209 Persons Needs Opportunities: 80-120 Assisted Low income Percent of AMI H A.m.e ssntss P F event+e;T°3 services Rental Assistance and PeFsens Assisted Affordable Rental Units Improved Housing Options and Supportive Services Rental Assistance Programs and Rental Units Service Programs- Low Income and Special Needs 5 Stabilize the Rental 2017 2021 Improvements in $40,500 Homelessness Prevention: 141 Gap Economic Stability Persons Assisted Service Programs- Low Income and Special Needs Table 6—Goals Summary Goal Descriptions City of Meridian P a g e 126 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 65 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan 1 Goal Name Improve Accessibility Goal The City will coordinate with the Public Works and Parks and Recreation Departments and " Aimprove accessibility Description by funding Fight "pathway improvements and upgrading/installing streetlights. 2 Goal Name Enhance Homeownership Opportunities Goal The City will provide funding to ACHA to supplement closing and down payment costs for LMI households. Description 3 Goal Name Administration and Fair Housing Activities Goal The City will administer the Program, including collaboration with local entities to educate residents and landlords on fair Description housing rights and responsibilities. 4 Goal Name Provide Social Services Goal The City will address identified needs by providing local agencies with funding to provide childcare, hemele«^^« Description 5 Goal Name Stabilize the Rental Gap Goal The City will provide funding to provide homelessness prevention to households at risk of homelessness. Description City of Meridian P a g e 127 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 66 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan Projects AP-35 Projects — 91.220(d) Introduction The City has allocated CDBG funds to projects that meet the priority needs and goals identified in the 2017-2021 Con Plan. Projects # Project Name 1 Homelessness Prevention 2 Youth Extended Care Scholarships 3 Homeownership Assistance 4 Streetlight Improvements Near Schools 5 E. Third R-re t Right of Way l.....pFev,,.... ent Fairview Ave Sidewalk Connection y SOAR G - Coordination 7 Administration and Fair Housing Table 7-Project Information Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs Projects were prioritized based on the needs identified in the 2017-2021 Con Plan, needs expressed in the PY19 CDBG competitive application process, and the experiences of the CDBG Scoring Committee. A common obstacle for all public service projects (Projects 1, 2, and 6 in the table above) is the lack of available funding to provide the necessary level of services.To address this, subrecipients will leverage other funding sources and utilize screening criteria to provide services to those with the highest level of need first. The Homeownership Assistance (Project 3 in the table above) program's main obstacle is related to the soaring housing market in Meridian and lack of affordable homes.There are often bidding wars for the few affordable units that come onto the market.To address this,ACHA has developed close working relationships with lenders to identify additional sources of assistance that will make the homebuyers more competitive in this market. The public facilities projects (Projects 4 and 5 in the table above) have the potential obstacle of rising construction costs,which is related to the soaring housing market. Oftentimes it is difficult to find a contractor to complete smaller construction projects because there is such a demand for large construction projects right now. No obstacles have been identified for Administration and Fair Housing(Project 7 above). City of Meridian P a g e 128 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 67 of 242 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) PY19 Action Plan AP-38 Project Summary Project Summary Information City of Meridian P a g e 129 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 68 of 242 1 Project Name Homelessness Prevention Target Area N/A Goals Supported °AWPI^ cAPiAl SPPXiPP Stabilize the Rental Gap Needs Addressed Improvements in Economic Stability Rental Assistance and Affordable Rental Units Improved Housing Options and Supportive Services Rental Assistance Programs and Rental Units Service Programs- Low Income and Special Needs Funding CDBG: $24,500 Description Provides a "safety net" to extremely low-, very low-and low-income families in need of short term,temporary assistance to keep them from slipping into homelessness.This is a proactive program that is dedicated to the prevention of homelessness in our community. Target Date 9/30/2020 Estimate the number 31 LMI households averaging 3 people per household who are at risk of and type of families homelessness. that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Services will be provided at The Jesse Tree of Idaho, located at 1121 Miller Street in Boise and will benefit households throughout Meridian. Planned Activities (05Q) Subsistence Payments 2 Project Name Youth Extended Care Scholarships Target Area N/A Goals Supported Provide Social Services Needs Addressed Improvements in Economic Stability Service Programs- Low Income and Special Needs Funding CDBG: $13,000 Description Provides funding for low-to moderate-income families to participate in before and after school programs as well as summer programs at a free or reduced cost. Target Date 9/30/2020 City of Meridian 30 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 69 of 242 Estimate the number 20 LMI households with children under age 13. and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Services will be provided at the Meridian Boys & Girls Club, located at 911 N. Meridian Road in Meridian. Planned Activities (05L) Child Care Services 3 Project Name Homeownership Assistance Target Area N/A Goals Supported Enhance Homeownership Opportunities Needs Addressed Homeownership Opportunities: 80-120 Percent of AMI Down Payment Assistance Opportunities Funding CDBG: $40,000 Description Provides safe and affordable housing and fostering self-sufficiency and stability for people in need through down payment and/or closing cost assistance. Target Date 9/30/2020 Estimate the number 4 LMI households purchasing a home in Meridian. and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Services will be provided at ACHA's offices located at 1001 S. Orchard Street in Boise and will benefit households throughout Meridian. Planned Activities (1313) Homeownership Assistance 4 Project Name Streetlight Improvements Near Schools Target Area N/A Goals Supported Improve Accessibility Needs Addressed Better Accessibility in Meridian Improve Accessibility in Meridian Funding CDBG: $115,662 City of Meridian 31 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 70 of 242 Description Install/upgrade to LED fixtures and poles on walking routes to Meridian schools in LMI areas to provide a safe and reliable access for children to get to school. Target Date 9/30/2020 Estimate the number 166 households with an average of 4 persons per household,who reside and type of families in the LMI area. that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Neighborhoods in walking zone of Meridian Middle and Meridian High Schools near W. Camellia Ln, NW 12th Ave., and W. State St. Planned Activities (03K) Street Improvements 5 Project Name Fairview Ave. Sidewalk Connection€.Third Street Right of Way I m r,+c Target Area N/A Goals Supported Improve Accessibility Needs Addressed Better Accessibility in MeridianimprevemeRtS iR ECE)ReMiG Stability Improve Accessibility in Meridian Funding CDBG: $188,000380,000 Description Right of , r+ iR M r„diaWrs sI„m and Mirth+ .,hieh Pathway connection to improve access and safety for pedestrians in an LMI area. During PY19 the City will allocate $233,554 toward Phase 1, which will include moving electrical infrastructure, demolition, and installation of curb and gutter. Phase 2 will be funded during PY20 and will include the installation of the multi-use path and accessible ramp. Any unspent funds allocated for Phase 1 will roll into Phase 2 durinL PY20. Target Date 9/30/2020 Estimate the number 1 nn 1 Ml he u 1Sehel.drs;.y „f fe wr r p 1 e rte r he---.S, he-Id- ...h , and type of families I,,,^ r travel iR the Redevelopment Area ef. ""^rildilaR.An estimated 875 that will benefit from households with an average of four people per household who reside in the proposed the LMI area. activities Location Description E.Third Street h +,.,,,e.p Qrr,.,d,. ay and +h., railrearl +r. eks Five Mile Creek Pathway on Fairview Ave to Lakes Place City of Meridian P a g e 132 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 71 of 242 Planned Activities (03K) Street Improvements 6 Project Name SOAR Care r^^r,,6Pat4':^CATCH Homelessness Prevention Target Area N/A Goals Supported Stabilize the Rental Gap°r^ �'^ c^ ;,� c^�,•; ^ Needs Addressed Improvements in Economic Stability Improved Housing Options and Supportive Services Rental Assistance and Affordable Rental Units Service Programs- Low Income and Special Needs Funding CDBG: $16,000 Description Provides Care C-^^rd-ipa+,^n and + ^ ^f.,,-iRd-i •6dWalS plyi,R.,f.,r emergency payments on behalf of individuals or families for the purpose of preventing homelessness. Target Date 9/30/2020 Estimate the number 8-16 LMI households averaging 3 people per household who are at risk and type of families of homelessness.ipp-Ovid-"'s, E Rtly expeFieRGiRg OF at Fo-sk ^f that will benefit from "^,....^'^rr^^r,;wh^ h- •^ Pi pqpp*Al health direr,l^r and disabilit • the proposed activities Location Description Services will be provided throughout the community, including at the CATCH, Inc. offices located at 503 S. Americana Blvd. in Boise. Planned Activities (05Q) Subsistence Payments(^SR` Disabilit •Services 7 Project Name Administration Target Area N/A Goals Supported Administration and Fair Housing Activities Needs Addressed N/A Funding CDBG: $3-25,000 Description This project will have activities that relate to the administrative, planning, and fa+F hegtechnical assistance processes of the CDBG program during PY19. Target Date 9/30/2020 City of Meridian P a g e 33 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 72 of 242 Estimate the number N/A and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Administration office is located in Meridian City Hall at 33 E. Broadway Ave. suite 102. Planned Activities (21A)Administration and Planning 8 Project Name Fair Housing Target Area N/A Goals Supported Administration and Fair Housing Activities Needs Addressed N/A Funding CDBG: $10,000 Description This project will carry out activities that relate to fair housing. At a minimum, CDBG funds will be used to implement a Fair Housing Campaign in April. Other opportunities to promote fair housing activities will be evaluated as they arise. Target Date 9/30/2020 Estimate the number 300 LMI households and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description The Fair Housing Campaign will be promoted via television, radio, and social media. Planned Activities (21D) Fair Housing Activities City of Meridian P a g e 34 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 73 of 242 AP-50 Geographic Distribution —91.220(f) Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed The City of Meridian's basis for allocating projects is geographically delineated within its municipal boundaries. Funding is determined by meeting national objectives, qualifying eligible activities, and through a competitive application process.The City does not specify target areas by census tract or block group. There are four(4) Census Tracts that are either fully or partially within Meridian's municipal boundaries: census tracts 0103.21; 0103.22; 0103.33; and 0103.35.The use of CDBG funding is not pre-determined on areas of low-and moderate- income concentration or racial characteristics. Service agencies providing CDBG funded services are primarily located in Boise; however, low-and moderate-income clients served reside in Meridian. Two LMI area benefit projects have been identified for PY19: • 6 .41-Qenefit: 5Streetlights will be upgraded/installed in census tract 103.22 • Sidewalk connection Slum and Bligh : right of way street ; RtS will be completed in census Ttracts 103.21 and 103.33 Geographic Distribution Target Area Percentage of Funds Table 8-Geographic Distribution Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically No projects were prioritized based solely on geographic area. Discussion The City allocates funds to assist low-to moderate-income (LMI) Meridian residents without targeting or prioritizing specific geographic locations. City of Meridian P a g e 135 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020- Page 74 of 242 Affordable Housing AP-55 Affordable Housing—91.220(g) Introduction The City of Meridian dedicates funding to providing LMI Meridian residents with affordable housing. One Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Supported Homeless 0 Non-Homeless 4 Special-Needs 0 Total 4 Table 9-One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement One Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported Through Rental Assistance 0 The Production of New Units 0 Rehab of Existing Units 0 Acquisition of Existing Units 4 Total 4 Table 10-One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type Discussion Funding is allocated for acquisition of existing single-family units. ACHA will utilize this funding to subsidize mortgage principal amounts, assist with closing costs, and provide up to 50%of the required down payment. To ensure the Section 215 definition of affordable housing is met, ACHA requires participants to qualify as a first-time homebuyer, purchase a home that will be their principal residence, and the homebuyer's annual household income must be at or below 80%of Area Median Income. Additionally,ACHA offers participants housing counseling and works with homebuyers to find housing where the cost of the housing is reasonable and affordable to the homebuyer, so the housing does not exceed 95 percent of the median purchase price for the area. City of Meridian P a g e 136 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 75 of 242 AP-60 Public Housing— 91.220(h) Introduction The City of Meridian is served by the Ada County Housing Authority(ACHA),who administers the Homeownership Voucher Program, Housing Choice Voucher, Mainstream Voucher, as well as managing the Family Self Sufficiency Program. Actions planned during the next year to address the needs to public housing As part of the City's overall Comprehensive Plan, Meridian has identified a goal of offering a diversity of housing types for all economic levels throughout the City.To accomplish this goal, Meridian encourages quality housing projects for all economic levels throughout the city. The City supports a variety of residential categories (low-, medium-, medium-high and high-density single family, multi-family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of opportunities to provide housing affordability to all. In spite of these efforts, ACHA has identified a lack of affordable units as a barrier to eligible renters and potential homeowners. Meridian is one of the towns within the greater Boise Metropolitan Area, locally known as the Treasure Valley, which ACHA serves.The Treasure Valley as a whole struggles with accessibility to affordable housing and necessary public services.ACHA estimates that 30%of households receiving Housing Choice Vouchers (HCV) are unable to identify a housing unit within 120 days, requiring them to relinquish the voucher and return to the waiting list. The City will continue to collaborate with ACHA,the CoC, and other partners during PY19 to move forward with the steps identified in the "Housing Affordability in Meridian" whitepaper.The whitepaper is currently being developed and is anticipated to be presented to Council in Fall 2019,with specific action steps identified at that time. Likely actions will include exploring Idaho's Housing Trust Fund and funding opportunities with Idaho Housing and Finance Association; working with ACHA to evaluate various strategies of administering their homeownership programs; and working with potential partners to administer a homeowner rehabilitation program. Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership ACHA encourages public housing residents to participate in homeownership by: • Referring families interested in homeownership to first-time homebuyer workshops covering the following topics: benefits of and preparation for homeownership, credit analysis, FICO scoring methodology, mortgage types and requirements, private mortgage insurance, loan-to- value ratio, down payment assistance programs, escrow and title process, property taxes, home maintenance, and homeowner responsibilities. • Providing one-on-one meetings with a Homeownership Coordinator to determine short- and long-term goals in obtaining homeownership and to make a plan to reduce any barriers that need to be addressed. • Collaborating with nonprofit partner agencies, lenders, and realtors in the delivery of counseling City of Meridian P a g e 137 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 76 of 242 services for low-to moderate-income first-time homebuyers in the FSS/HCV programs. • Expanding partnerships with community organizations, lending institutions, and real estate professionals. • Actively marketing the Homeownership Assistance program to existing voucher holders through quarterly newsletters and attending the annual recertification meetings for voucher holders to explain the programs. If the PHA is designated as troubled, describe the manner in which financial assistance will be provided or other assistance ACHA is not a troubled PHA. Discussion The City is committed to helping LMI households access necessary services and homeownership as desired through a variety of methods. City of Meridian P a g e 138 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 77 of 242 AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities — 91.220(i) Introduction The City coordinates with the Boise City/Ada County Continuum of Care (CoC) and the Region 4 Behavioral Health Board (BHB) to identify the strategies to address needs of those who are at risk of or currently experiencing homelessness. Describe the jurisdictions one-year goals and actions for reducing and ending homelessness including Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs The City of Meridian has been an active member of the CoC for the last four years to better understand and coordinate the needs that Meridian residents who are currently or at risk of experiencing homelessness face and how to better serve them. In addition, City representatives are frequently involved in public discussions, presentations, and meetings with citizens, other governmental officials, and local service providers including West Ada School District,Jesse Tree, and CATCH to provide support, understanding, and outreach to those who are experiencing homelessness in Meridian. In previous years,the City worked with the CoC to add data points to the CoC's Homeless Management Information System (HMIS)to enable the City to determine how many Meridian residents are experiencing homelessness and the reasons for their housing crisis.This data and information will be evaluated during PY19 to better inform strategies and partnerships for the City to implement.The City is committed to serving the individual needs of Meridian's homeless population as identified by the CoC and local organizations. The City has also worked with the CoC to conduct the annual Point-in-Time Count, which helps determine the number of people who are experiencing homelessness on a given day. This information allows the City to understand the level of homelessness in Meridian and to develop a program that better serves those in need. The City will continue to assist with this process in upcoming years. The City intends to continue to use its partners to identify, understand, and support those experiencing homelessness (especially persons experiencing unsheltered homelessness) or at risk of homelessness with special needs in Meridian. Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons While there are emergency shelter and transitional housing facilities located in other nearby cities in the Treasure Valley, none of these facilities are located within City of Meridian. The City has prioritized funding homelessness prevention to mitigate the need for these services, but also works closely with the CoC and Coordinated Entry to assist Meridian residents who are in need of emergency shelter or transitional housing. The City encourages agencies who provide these services to apply for CDBG funding, but there were no applications during PY19 for projects directly related to emergency shelters or transitional housing projects. However, all services to be funded are available to those who qualify. , City of Meridian P a g e 139 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 78 of 242 Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families,families with children,veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again The City will provide funding to ACHA to assist with down payment and closing cost assistance to low-to moderate-income residents of Meridian. In addition, Meridian's work with Jesse Tree and CATCH has helped provide rental and case management services aimed at preventing and resolving needs for those currently experiencing homelessness or at risk of homelessness in Meridian. The partnerships that the City has with local committees, organizations, and networks in evaluating, understanding, and addressing the many needs of Meridian residents experiencing homelessness include Meridian Police Department, Ada County Sheriff's Office, City of Boise, City of Nampa, City of Caldwell, Women's and Children's Alliance,Jesse Tree, Boys &Girls Clubs of Ada County, West Ada School District, CATCH,Ada County Housing Authority, Local HUD office, CoC, Meridian Food Bank, United Way, NeighborWorks Boise, IHFA,Terry Riley, EI-Ada Community Action, Our Path Home, and many others.These partnerships are extensive and ongoing in order to help address and prevent homelessness in Meridian. These efforts, particularly coordination and participation with CATCH and the CoC, are designed to assist local service providers in helping persons experiencing homelessness make the transition to permanent housing and independent living while shortening the time individuals and families experience homelessness. In addition,the City's relationships with ACHA, CATCH, and Jesse Tree are aimed to develop activities through the Program that facilitate access for individuals and families experiencing homelessness to affordable housing units while also preventing individuals and families from becoming homeless. Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); or, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs. The City is actively involved in the CoC, which is comprised of representation from ACHA, Health and Welfare, mental health service providers and other service agencies.The Ada County Sheriff, Boise Police Department and Idaho Department of Juvenile Corrections are also part of the CoC.The CoC coordinates, collects data, reviews data, and prioritizes strategies based on data and input from providers.The priority over the last two years has been Coordinated Entry and Permanent Supportive City of Meridian P a e 140 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 79 of 242 Housing. Coordinated Entry is housed with Our Path Home and is available to all communities within Ada County. Case conferencing is coordinated between health, mental health, and service providers for vulnerable households. The City is also involved in the Behavioral Health Board (BHB),which focuses on mental health and substance use disorders.The BHB is a government entity established by the Idaho legislature in 2014 to advise Idaho's behavioral health authority, identify gaps, and promote improvements to the delivery of integrated services for behavioral health in Idaho.The Board promotes and supports prevention, intervention, recovery and resiliency for individuals and families in need. It is composed of 23 stakeholders, advocates, and professionals across the continuum of care. Involvement with this group allows the City to understand the broader needs of the community as related to behavioral health in general and specifically for those who are being discharged from institutional settings such as mental health facilities and corrections programs. During PY19 the City will also provide funding to Jesse Tree to keep families, individuals, and children who are at risk of eviction stably housed. Meridian partners with other organizations such as CATCH to assess needs and provide services for those at risk of becoming homeless. Discussion Much of the work funded through the Program is directed at housing stability for Meridian's LMI residents. In addition to the services previously mentioned, the City is focusing on public transportation for seniors,ADA compliance improvements to public facilities, and public facility improvements such as sidewalk and streetlight improvements in LMI areas are focused, outside of those already noted, to meet the needs of persons who are and who are not homeless in the community. City of Meridian P a e 141 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 80 of 242 AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing—91.220(j) Introduction: Section V of the Consolidated Plan and Fair Housing Assessment, a supplement to the City's 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan which can be found in the Grantee Unique Appendices, analyzes public and private barriers to housing choice in Meridian. Stakeholders were also interviewed about housing barriers. Barriers associated with tax policies, land use controls and zoning, building codes,fees and charges, growth limits, and policies affecting the return on residential investment were not identified as barriers. On the contrary,the review found a favorable environment for development and a migration toward more diverse housing types. As such,the actions summarized below do NOT address the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing (policies, procedures, processes). Instead,they focus on actions that address other types of identified barriers. Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment The City has expressed a commitment to creating more diverse housing types through its redevelopment plan for downtown.The Destination Downtown plan states that creating diverse housing opportunities for different housing needs and life-cycles in downtown Meridian is important to support new businesses and activity.A healthy housing mix will also help to draw people downtown and ensure 24-7 activity. Housing created or redeveloped as part of the downtown plan is expected to include apartments,townhomes, condominiums, duplexes, and single-family homes.The City helped facilitate the recent RFP for a large portion of the publicly-owned properties in downtown Meridian with a priority given to proposals that focused on developing mixed use and high-density housing. The project that was awarded, Downtown Lofts,will bring several affordable units to downtown Meridian including six (6)that will be dedicated to CATCH participants. This project is expected to be completed in early 2021. In 2017,to evaluate potential fair housing concerns within the City's zoning code,the City had BBC Consulting utilize a "Review of Public Policies and Practices (Zoning and Planning Codes)"form recently circulated by the Los Angeles fair housing office of HUD.The research did not reveal any negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing.This includes land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting returns on residential investment. In addition, over the next few program years,the City intends to undergo a review of potential policy and code changes that will incentivize the future development of multi-family and affordable housing units in Meridian. Discussion: Please see the Grantee Unique Appendices attached to the City's 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan for details (Section V, pages 9 through 11). City of Meridian 142 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 81 of 242 AP-85 Other Actions —91.220(k) Introduction: This section discusses the Other Actions the City will take to address the needs of low-income residents. Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs The City will continue to engage in conversations with neighboring communities and service providers to identify and address underserved needs, maintain affordable housing, and reduce the number of families living in poverty. During PY19, the City has allocated funding to assist qualifying individuals with accessing SSI/SSDI benefits, housing stability for those at risk of homelessness, and extended care programs that offer youth a positive place to go. Additionally,the City is in the process of hiring a new Economic Development Administrator and has set the expectation that the Economic Development program will work closely with the CDBG program in an effort to better align the needs of our residents. The City will increase relationships with private providers, developers, and social services providers to reduce the obstacles for Meridian residents to achieve decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities. Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing The City intends to partner with local service providers that will assist in fostering and maintaining affordable housing. Projects funded during PY19 will provide: emergency assistance to families who are at risk of eviction and homelessness; scholarships for children to participated in extended care programs so their caregivers can work; and down payment assistance to help renter households become homeowners. Additionally,the City will be working with service providers that focus on providing stability to those with mental health and/or substance use disorders to allow them to gain or maintain affordable housing with access to care coordination and assistance for individuals applying for SSI/SSDI who are experiencing homelessness, have a behavioral health issue, and a disability. The City will also explore additional partnerships—including partnerships with mission-driven and private developers—to bring more workforce housing into downtown and underutilized land parcels. The City is also in the process of hiring a new Economic Development Administrator that will collaborate with the CDBG Program in an effort to develop workforce housing and opportunities for residents to increase their income in an effort to foster and maintain affordable housing. Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards Over the course of the upcoming program year,the City will provide information regarding lead-based paint hazards to educate the public and continue to gauge the prevalence of lead paint contamination within the City. There is a wealth of information already available from HUD,the State, neighboring communities, and various organizations that staff will gather and make available at City Hall, on the City of Meridian P a e 143 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 82 of 242 City's website, and at other locations throughout the community as needed. Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty-level families The City will fund projects to assist poverty-level individuals and families access services that provide a support system and allow them to focus on the steps they need to take to improve their living situation. Projects include programs that provide emergency assistance to families who are at risk of homelessness, housing cost assistance for residents unable to cover the full costs of home purchases, and a fast-track process to access SSI/SSDI.The City's local strategic plan also plans to address poverty- based issues through the expansion of needed public services as well as the ever-strong focus of Meridian on economic development and the expansion of quality employment opportunities for the jurisdiction's LMI population. As part of its Strategic Plan,the City is working on an in-depth socioeconomic profile of the City to help identify the needs of community members as it pertains to housing, finances,food, education, healthcare, and transportation. Completing this research will allow the City to better understand the factors that are contributing to residents who are facing poverty in Meridian, as well as help define solutions that could help mitigate those factors.The City's hope is that this research will provide long- term insights and strategies to reduce the number of poverty-level families in Meridian. Actions planned to develop institutional structure The City recently made the CDBG Administrator position a full-time position and changed the position title to Community Development Program Coordinator. This position is now funded out of the City's general fund.This institutional change is designed to provide more time to effectively manage the CDBG program and provide flexibility for the position to expand efforts into economic and other areas that can help meet the community development needs of the City. Staff will continue to work to attain relevant and appropriate professional development trainings during the program year to learn and address current and future institutional problems. Discussions will continue about the expansion and opportunities to add new program staff to assist in this community development work. The City has been involved in the institutional restructuring of the CoC as well as the implementation of new HMIS and Coordinated Entry standards for service providers in the County.These activities have dramatically altered the institutional framework of housing and other service providers in the region and has improved the efficiency and transparency of the coordinated work being done to address these needs.The City hopes to identify new institutional structures that can be developed, reformed or changed to better support the needs of those most at risk in the region (e.g. transitional and emergency housing networks). Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies City staff will be working with the CoC to identify ways to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies.As in many communities, there is not enough funding to provide the level of services we'd like so the CoC plans to identify a way of coordinating services that are available and reducing duplication of services for a more effective use of funding. Multiple methods will City of Meridian P a g e 144 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 83 of 242 be explored including phone apps and enhancing services that are already available. The City's partnership and funding relationship with local housing service organizations including NeighborWorks Boise,Jesse Tree, and Ada County Housing Authority will continue to expand in this program year. In addition, coordination with other organizations like CATCH, Boise Rescue Mission, Interfaith Sanctuary,Terry Riley, EI-Ada Community Action,Jannus, Idaho Office for Refugees,Agency for New Americans, Women's and Children's Alliance, and all members associated with the local CoC (including private housing developers) will continue to be built upon to improve networks, coordination, and problem solving in the jurisdiction. Meridian's participation in the local CoC, housing and homelessness roundtables, and other regional coordination efforts outlines the City's continued action plan for enhancing the networking and coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. Discussion: The City intends to fund multiple projects that will improve access to affordable housing and suitable living environments for Meridian residents. Staff will be working with subrecipients to identify barriers within their programs and find ways to address them to provide more effective services. Staff will also identify ways to improve and expand Meridian's CDBG Program for future years. City of Meridian P a g e 145 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 84 of 242 Program Specific Requirements AP-90 Program Specific Requirements — 91.220(i)(1,2,4) Introduction: Below is a description of the program requirements for Meridian's CDBG program and its commitment to meet those requirements. Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(1)(1) Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table.The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out. 1.The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed 0 2.The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan. 0 3.The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements 0 4.The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan 0 5.The amount of income from float-funded activities 0 Total Program Income: 0 Other CDBG Requirements 1.The amount of urgent need activities 0 2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income. Overall Benefit-A consecutive period of one,two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70%of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low and moderate income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan. qR :75100% This City's certification period includes program years 2018, 2019, and 2020. Outside of admin and fair housing,Tthe City will allocate all funding for PY19 to LMI projects. The City commits to meet the 70% LMI benefit requirement of the federal CDBG program over the span of that three-year certification period. i.qhach will be completed in a designated shim and blight area. Hewever, during Program Years 20-1-8 and 2019 the City has allecated The main pFeject the Gity will be completing this year OS the FE.Third StFeet Right of Way 1FApFevements, -..At the three year City of Meridian P a g e 146 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 85 of 242 Attachments City of Meridian P a g e 147 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 86 of 242 Citizen Participation Comments PY19 Action Plan Date Method of Contributor Comment City Response Submission 6/5/19 Email Councilman Do you have a data that shows the Based on the population we serve with this program, I assume most of Borton default rate of those who receive our loans are FHA loans,so my best guess at a comparison comes from assistance,as compared to the Core Logic,which reports that nationally FHA loans had a 3.7%serious common mortgage market? delinquency rate in September 2018,which is the lowest it's been in 11 Something that shows perhaps a years. greater success rate I hope,which may be due to a thorough vetting According to the two agencies who have administered the process for those who applied for the Homeownership Assistance Program for the City,there have been zero assistance. defaults since the beginning of this Program. This non-existent default rate reflects on ACHA and NeighborWorks Boise,who have done a phenomenal job of screening and educating potential participants. ACHA and NeighborWorks efforts not only set these households up for success, but also show the agencies abilities to be good stewards of public funds for the City of Meridian. PY19 Action Plan Amendment Date Method of Contributor Comment City Response Submission 3 26 20 Email and Stephanie Day CATCH would like to change the focus of their The City supports this effort and will include it in the Phone Call program to better assist with the current needs. amendment. Instead of providing SOAR Care Coordination they would like to provide Homelessness Prevention. 4 7 20 Email and Councilwoman Given the deep recession that seems very likely to The City will be receiving an additional$288,106 under Council Strader result from COVID-19 can the community the CARES Act. The priorities of this funding will include Discussion development program make a recommendation on homelessness prevention in the form of rent, mortgage, more robust plans for preventing homelessness? and utility assistance. Staff is currently working with multiple providers to apply for this funding. City of Meridian P a g e 148 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 87 of 242 City of Meridian P a g e 149 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 88 of 242 Grantee Unique Appendices Consolidated Plan and Fair Housing Assessment SECTION V. Public and Private Actions This section examines puhlir and prisrate decisions thataffea hgysing chnipg--It heglnswith an examinatian of the land vse regulations and the policies and practices oFthe Eni5eQtyf Ada County Housing Authority(RCACHA),the largest provider or publicly supported housing in the region-It alsn analym-9 mortgage Ivan decisions of the private sector-Other privahesectnr actlAloq are exmnined in the fairhousing legat cages discucLsed iTi fkwtion VI- Public Horsing Authority The policies and procedures oFthe Boise City{Ada County Housing Authority JECACHA]were reviewed as part of the Fair housing a nalysis,using the discossinn topics rerpmmended by HIED in the AFH temrtlate.The following discussion of RCACHA Pnticim and pmcedures is based on in- 4epth interviews with management rnterwiews with RCACHA starEahnutpolides and practices revealed there may he same Fair housingconcernx in regaNs M mess to-erYices and hou03jg For persons wjth disahilltles. rn SUM,the BCACHA suhsrrihes to the Following procedures- M Fqual weight preFerenees for elderly,disabled and Families with minnrchildren.People who are timing nut oFtransitianaI housing go to the tip of the list,while out-al`-state requests are last- 4 Buy,rehab and sel I affordable hamLs thrnvgh EMACHA's$500,0013 self funded pavigraak The grant fr►ruws on down payment and clo5jng cast assistance. ■ Comply with HUD's Apri 1 2{]15 guidance on crim inal history by evatuating violent, drug€ rIvi€tiow individually and conducting three year look hack[RCACHA was al ready in compliance before the ream#change in crimenal historypoliCy)- RCACHA€Etrrently assists 1,8013 very-bow income households with Section 8 rental assistance in Ads County-At the time this report was prepared,RCACHA was not accepting any additional applicatiort_s F+ir the Section R Housing Chnice VoucheftHM program-The waitlist Mrvau€her assistance is anywhere between fi to 24 months,depending on federal funding-RCACHA stalf feel that the market i5 relatively accepting ofSecpon B vnu,doers,but this varies by lecetinn. The greatest rhallepges(aced by the RCACHA are-, ■ Transportation harriers forsccessing servi€es.Althaugh land3 ford s are wil ling W take Section 8 in the arearthe RCACHA has had mmt success with Boise Isndlord-5-Even when 3andlord_s #Aire 5ectinn 8 in Meridian,most of the servjVes sF*1.4pSaod in R(i5eal►d the lack arpublie tre nspErrtation creates harriers_ IBBCRESEAA04&CONSULTING SECTION br PefE t City of Meridian P a g e 50 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 89 of 242 • Physlcal acroslbility in housing for person-:Ith d Isabl 1Ities- • Lack-of affordable housing and preservation of existing multilamlly unim especially for seniors-7he PHA's focus has been on rehabilimtinghomes and selling affordahle+units, rather than rental unirs.ThP biggest issues are push back from the community to prevent new affordable multi-family and difficulty Inacrosing LI li'PC, The geographic distribu ion of IlousingChoice voucher[H M holders is pictured in Figure V-1- Cens115 tracts In eastern 21nd southern Meridian either do not have available data or HCV don"t exist.The area with the highestclusterof KVholders is located in the central and west central cel)sus tracts of the City.Asciiscuswil In Section IV.this is an area ol`the City with relatively moderate opportyinl.ty- in addition to providing KVs,6CACFlAofFers a homeownership voucher throargb their Family SeiFSufficieney(HS)program,This program is availaNeto residents currenttyparticipatingin the HCV program.The»ousingAuthority's goal is to promote awl support homeownership for faml Iles by peymentasslst,ance to help pay For the oast of homeownership and toprovide additional assumnixto mortgage lenders. Figure V-1, HUD AFFH Taal Jurisdiction Map of Meridian,Map 5,Publidy Supported Housing and Race}Eithnicity,2010 FUDATirma1valf=u-1hering Fair Housing Dafaeird Mapping Toal Jun 4aClloM r_ �y.' Cn�n�nFXlrw�q7a Y I II.:.--:il5wlir r,� -.'i' .a .l•� -,i.L-Y^ � y' d-y Wi.=Pmlnr-}�an _ Wx-il'ra5-W.W..4n:- +IkFwti•ic _ R _ I " FF•�s-k %or FFspurk d3 Jr J -Nul rx-:t.unn FY,:rk - - Gr �: PcTam[irwahtt UN[s .. .. a .. .-..I•- rx _- 21C is xsd Li1Wk IrrlYlc.i• 3W x5 �Cg sal- Arn=¢Lual;LE4 IPU1;,d oar;rls l(A-15hi-LAW {• s4�16 5.12 N:sedp&h.W:A y-imrn, 5cci_n 8.Crc: 'AdJ:3,,k up UW-C I:aimn m:p:a r.;,l hk El-25 r3:i^ri-Itlp da xrsry rcua wrh 3�:aFs.dsl rglfsH'p aikpclks X�uY[b'sl�W�ki hp,si,t 6y lox .I nrM XlcXpn:Yqn Xlpn(r:r+r{'I MCCAF 2aQlan:l Yi rn f:Fr al i_� spur.: n[m,wMo.e,end RlaprrY�fnnl'+,nrlfxp++xA�kJ�iltrJ BBC RE9.AAh1&fArdWrING SECTION V,RAEA# City of Meridian 51 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 90 of 242 Lard Use Reguiations and Policies BRf.reviewed the City of Meridian's zoning regulations,cnmprehensive plan and planning fees to aw-.0 potent mi fair housing eoncem or opportunities resulting from the development process.This review did not identiFy any Lair housing problems. The City hay recently expressed a onmmitment to€reating mare diverse hpu5ingtypes through its redevelopment plan Lrrdowntowri-The Plan stales that creating diverse hnusing opporWaities fordifterent housing neeJsand Lifv-cy€tes in downtown Meridian is important to support new husinesse5 and activity.A healthy housing mix will also help to draw penple downbDwn and enctkre 24-7 activity.Housing created or redeveinped as Partoftbe dovrnbown plans is expected W include apartmen[sr pawn homes,€ondominiumLs,duplexes,ind single family homes- Land use and 2011`11ng laws.To evalt}ate pcikenda I Fair housing cnnCerns within tyre City's inning WJe,BBC utilized a"Revietivof Public Policies and PmcdGeS(7*ning and Planning Codes)"Form recently circulated by the Los Angeles Fair housing oMce of HIJD-ThEs 5eetian pr;ses the questions from this checklist,along with responses 1boutthE C'tyrs cnde_The zoning code For the City of Meridian was updated i n December 201(3- Doff the cQdedefrnikonnf fpmio'hovetheEfectofdlfcriminvtifFgaquinsturrre0owdindiWiouR. w�thdjI5abt fitieewhnresrdeWpwrheriftgcongregaWorgraup10vingiwranggem--nt? Nn_The{.ity's code definer the term"Family"a5 a person Living alone or two nr more Persons related by blond or marriage;a group of not more than ten persons who need not he related hY hlnnd or marriage living together in a dwelLllig unit,orelght or Feweir unrelabed rnentatly and}or phxrsirally handicapped nr elderly pet ons residing i n a dwelling under staff supervision. "Clrvup home"is not defined in the City's ender but the Hear definition ot'Family'aPptie5 to €ongregaW or groµp I ruing arrangemeos. Zpning Rgguratlipn Impediment.-Does the CWe defin?6vn of f¢mixy"have the effect pf discrimir3w3n67ugainst unnqu edindividuah with Xwhitities who reside bVetherin a cmugrt;gpte orgrtru+a fivingarmopgement?No.Although some jurisdictioms do not deFne Family to allow rcv- flexibility,Meridian's definitinn provides a wide range ofspplicatinns- A"nrding to lawyer Brian f'nnnolly,co-author of a recent American Bar A.,Lroc.iatin n hook on group hnnies planning and regulations,some jurisdictions are removing definitions of tanrily from local codes bo avoid potential liandityr-h Instead,communities a re using more Ftexihle definitinns that avoid distinctions based on tree relation of the hnusehnld members and instead fncus on the"Functianai aspects 4F a Family relationSh4- 7.nrrigg RWuJa born fmpediment'Is the Cpdedefinitipn of"d+sabihty'the some in the Fair Hmu;inq Act?The Inning Code dries not provide a definition of"disahhility,""disabled"ar"handicap." Gaup Morons.-krvirgieffrE*rihe and tkfwnbkNannhWandRVurotim,Connolly,Brian iL and dwi tRNrrrhffn. 1813C RESEAACM&COMI-TING SECTION wr PAGE 3 City of Meridian 52 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 91 of 242 Practice Jmpgdiment!ages the wwPing gpportuni(ies fiar rndividupls with drmhffrws and m&charmterrze wch housing orb a"hoarding orrromjpghau5e"orhnteq"?N(3-The City's code does not define"bpardingor rooming house". Practice impediment saes the zoning ordinonzedenyhaasirig nppoFTUn trea fur4&ahffrtyr individuck with on_site housfrty supporting services?No.The defMnl Glop For a Family remgnim the need fvr supervisors,which is linked by an-sitesuppuilive 5erviee.5_ fhpe5 the furt0krion Whey allow any namber afunrVoted perw",%Fq rgFide hpgether,but restrict such ocmPvn fy;rf the rssrderrts are disabled?Nn,the City limits both.The number of u nrelated persons in nnehai Behold is re% icw4+d to ten and then cupancy limit for group domes is eight. S the furiadlction p0kynnt allow d&ahledpenmirs by make remanoWe nrgdi)5patfans orpmwlde rea_mnabJe accamgwitatrpn Or disabled Caen+ale Wro live rrI mvnierpaf sgppfied or managed residentialhaysirj9 No- Does the furfsdretion require puhlkhearing to obtainptrhlic inputpT. ifice*CeptinRstn zoning and land-useru+e.F Mirdisahledopptrcarlts and is the hearrggonl)JordJsQhledappipcanLs rather than for0appficarrts?No.Public hearings are required to Dhraln a subdivision, con4i2inn31 use permit or varianpe,but the hearing t5 not specific to per5pnswith disabilities. foes the?onfng nrdinartne address mixed usa:72 Haw are the residential land etees rrigeg55ed?What 51andarikapply7The City-of Meridian has three mixed use zoning districts-Old Tpwn, Traditional Neighhgrttoard Center and Tmdiponal Neighbarhna►d Residential.Mixed use is addressed in 11itle 11.Chapter 2.Ar ride 6 of City Crsde,and titled TF34itional Neighhnrhnod Distrkts.'1'ft2 Traditional Neighhorhood District's purpow L5'to encourage mixed us,cnmpad development Ghat is sensitive to the envlrnamental rharacteristie5 of the land and Fapllitates the efficient use vFserviees...A traditional neighborhnpd district diver5lfles and integrates land uses within dnsr proxim ity to each otlrerr and it prauiaes tar the dai ly recreational and shppping needs of the residents." The standards for developing within a mixed use area vary by inning district-see MCC 1 I-ZD-2- Does the zoning prdirrance describe any areas in pfris jvri5dretioa as exclasiwe?No. Are there exclW.srarrs or dvrewTiansaf hmiring housing to any af'the faffowivrggrav+xv race;rrrlor, seer,religron,qge,disahlJrty,marital stptus or)brn'ifial staters andfor creed rrf`natlonat moon?NCL Are there any restdcdons for Senior hoosing in the zoning ordifwace?Jf ym;do the restriclrnrrs cpmfrlywrUr Fedenaiiarw on JrpusOngprolderpar5grta(i.e..w1e0y orcvpied bypemWZ5 62yearsaf age or order or at ku5t onepermnSSy"nofage and has.W- nificantfacrlitrespr.servicestomser tyre physrcal pr squafi creeds of wider people f?No.$senior housing is not uniqueEy addressed in the Code except in theaeFtnition of Family. foes the aprtfV nrgdimanre amrvin a�y 5pecW provi5ionsfor risking houviR9 aeceSsrhie 10 perwm with disabilities?No. BBC R€S€ARCM&CONSUMHG SECTION wr PAGE 4 City of Meridian 53 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 92 of 242 Dies the 20FO{g nrdJ"nWe&=bM;h rcCppj-zracy.standards ar maurmam accupgnLy irmats?Yes. Households are all subject to n=pancy limits.HnLueholds coTnpoced of unrelated persons are rer,tricped to ten people and restricted to eight people for mentally and/or physically handicapped nr elderly persons under 5ta fir svpervision- Ares the wnin.9rrdrrppnn inelutteR Na. Descrihe the minimum standards and amenities required by the ordinance fipr a mvltrpie fami0y prNeet with myeetto hurri capparking.The City dne$not have explicit regVirernent;for handicap parting for muld-Fami ly,or any other project It is the responsibility Of the a pplieant.fdevelnperto€amply with ADA jMCC 11X-50). Dreg the aorrrjg mde drgbn6 inh niprciVxear hnuung from ether 5-inglelomi0y resrdenbar and mnitrfarrtrtyresidenZW1 LL es by the aiaNiratrptt ofa C+ondrt+onaj paeiaergnid(epra)?No. Does the aonrng rode drstiaegaishhandicappedhoasirrg from othersinglefanri re5ide+r WantX moltljk3mrtyresi0renlIkIzlwes by the appliratrapar pfp Cpnditrraval use permit(epra)?alp. Haw pre'Vecfal9-up PaUsrrAq-definedfn zaninq+ude?Croup hotk5ing i5 not defined in the code,but is referenced in other definitions_ a blurs ft orfesidential€are facilities:if the use resulvs in more than ten(f 0)persons oQwVyinga dwelling at any nne time,the applicant or owner shAl cnneurreilt[y appty Fear a change of occupancy as required by the building code i n accord with title 10 of this code-'lire owner and{nr operator of the Facility shall Secure and mai ntain a 1 icense from the state or Idaho depsrtrnent oFhealth and weirare,facility Standards dlvis9on- ■ Famlilyr.A person livi ng alone or two{2)or more persons related by blood or marriage;A group of not nxare tha n pen(10)persons who need oat be related by blood or marriage living together in a dwel[ing unit;Sight(t;)or fewer unrelated mentally and/or physically handicapped or elderly persons residing in a dwelling under staff supervision,provided that rup more than two(2)staff members reside in the dwelhngatany one tlme- Ares Ure juri.0icbajy�+Apa}niapg and halrrdrng wades fTe.Te*7dlymakespeeffic refereancetra the vcces0b1hV requinemen.E5 contained in the f 3043 vmendswnr to Noe iron Housing Aa?Is Mere ony provisipa fir mnnitrring aomplionce?Nn. Private Sector Actions The a ppcludingsecpon in this chapter Focuses on private secppractiprls that could present harriers to Fair housingchai€e.It contains an analysis OF Home Mortgage Disdnsure Act(HMDA) data,which report lending activi ty of Financial i nstitutiowr,- HMDA data ate widely used to examine poterntial diwTI mination in mckrtgKge lending-F rancial institutions have been required to report 11 MDA data since the 1970s,when civil rights laws prompted higher scrytiny of lending activity.The variahles contained In the HMDA data5et have expanded aver time,allowing For more comprehensive a na lyse5 and betper resulm However. despite expansions in the data reported,publ is H M DA data remain limited because¢F the RBC RESEAAN&C0MLn dWG SECTION w,PAU 5 City of Meridian 54 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 93 of 242 Information that L4 wgreported.As 5nlch!SMok[ $nf lending disparitle$that µse HMDA dat$carry a 5imilarcavent-HMDA data can he used to determine dirlpari,ties in Inan originations and interest rates among bprMwers ofdiNrent races,ethni€ities,tenders,and IDcaticin of tine property[hey hope to-own-Thedata can also he used to explain many gFthe re--;gns for any lendingdisperides(e-g.,poor credit histnry}.Violations of fair lending,praetiees,hnwever, generally origi nate with*cleral regulators who have acoe_Ss to a broader set nfin.Formation(e.g-, hormwer[Dan files)of Iendingprartioe5- This section uses theartalysis of TqM DA data bn determine if disparities in loan approvals and terms:exist for Inan appdjeants of different ra€e5.and ethnicities.The HMDA data analysed in this secp4n MIlect loans applied for by residents in 2014•,the latest year Fpr which HMDA were publidy available at the time this docu meat was prepared.It also onmpares the results of the HMDA analysis with leading outcomes reported is the last AI- This anaJysi5wsncompleted at the Qniinty level to provide a broader dataset of minnr[ty applicants and hetter detect any Fair lending concerns,As discussed in 5erdart 1,the dissimilarity index was h igher in the county than For the City alone- Loan apphratiorts. During 2014.there were 15,791 Iran appllcations proces5ed in Ada{runty Mir home purct ses,Ivan rertnarices,and home irnpravemeriM Twenty loan applications did not designate a census tract fqr where the home was located.(If the remaining 15,771 applications with a knnwn perLELL-i fact,30 percent,or 4,76E$applicatinns,were located wlth[n the City of Meridisn.'fllis vnlume of app[ications is much lawEr than in prior years,[n 201%there were a total of 6,196 loan applicat[ons proressed in Meridian_ Overall,more than half of the 8.607 Ins applications(55%)were for home purchases.Another 44 percent were for refinances-Lust 2 percent were for home irrtprnvem+enM Nearlythree-faµrths(72%)ntthe loan applications were cnnven#ianpl(L-!.,not Bnvemment insured-or�wranteed),14 percent were Fede"i Housing Administration-insu red and 13 percent were Veterans Administration-gusranneed. Figure V-2 shows the number and percentage of loan Ppplicationui by ra€ip.Over-pit,White resident suhm itted more Ivan applications than any other racial nr ethnlr group.The Figure also provides a onlurnn mmparing the racial and etlrril{dlstrthutkari of all Cntrnty residents from the 2014ACS-The percentage nfHispanic loan applicants(3%)war-dispm"onabeto the percentage-of the total Hispanic population(8%)-6nth White and Lion-Hispa nie residents eo}Wrienced a similar trend pFs lower percentage oFapp4l;anfs compared to their pe.r4eritgge of the total pDauJatiOn- SdCRESEARCM&COH MING SECTION wrPAGEC City of Meridian 55 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 94 of 242 figure V-2, Low Applications Received by Applicamts TOW Race and Ethnicity,Ada County,2014 race. RM Arne*ir.Bn Induct or Maska N*Vye dl 1% pra pGniesnrnon•n..r.ernOrrpmm Darldo Awn M lid 2'd. nut Add 7n CM-Sk'....4hq-.H eU-1' 'Black or Afrlcap A rnerkan 93 t% t% Chma pap.lxhn coegwr a Aar Odu(1o6. Neriwe H9waiitr%Or PBtirit Islander 63 D% D% &Q..CA. Whitt 14.363 62% 93'a FREE WW6 A"Cola 2034.2019 AUa.rd Ethnrcltp. BBC R&6a mh&C&Udliry. s65wir 535 3% 9% Non.Hispanir 1#90 M 92ffi Outcome of laa 11 appllcationS. Figure V-3 displays the aoina;tako n an loan applikatign:5 in 2014. Ofthe potential actions that€i)uId be taken pn a Ina n_ R `[.pan originated'indicateSthat the appli€ation was approved and the applicantsocepted the loan; ■ 'Approved,but not accepted"means that the applicatiun was approved,but the applicant chase not to wcept the loan; a 'D4prlied L-Y}+iinarsciall institution"signiFres that theapplication wad TIOtapprQVe!4: ■ "Withdrawn hyal phrant"indi€ade9 that Cheapplicantchose not to pursue the Lean hetare an approval decision hsd been made',and 4 'File cimed Lair incnmpletenesx"means that the appRcation was incomplete and the laan was not evaluated. More than two-thilrds(7[V%)of all loans appl led roc were originated and 14 percent of applicatinm were denied-Ten penw7st or loon applications were withdrawal by the applicant a"d the remainingappli€ations were either approved but not accepted or clgsed Far incgmpletene5s. BBC RESEAAN&COHSIAnNG SECTION Vr PkGE 7 City of Meridian P a g e 56 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 95 of 242 figure V-3, loan Applications and Action 4g -.354 ■ Irar.nrlgxtrr. Taken,Ada County,2014 Nmr. - ■f'f5'IkailnnAxSk�hY rinancW instiljAun oaf�d�Mu�4 bN+fu mWnf�„ny propmW or om•a.rar anV:rzL ■b(1�IIW II Vf i'.111f ILLIJM7'Lrj seu": x1pllranr FEC 4M4'2rN ram M3A and 9Br Rd°mel�a ruuh% d{h,liwlitxer,;,iuxtiL',l nr.t x:cptr.r. HE J000-a;3r imv'uVIeLe•in� The most recrnL d istribvti"of loan 8151plication outcomes was simli to thgr o,rttvmes for the City of Meridian in 2010:the ptirCentagt of dcnird loan applications(1*%)remained the same,in 2014.Loan appl IcatLons that were originated were lower(67%)Ln 2010.but ioan appl iCatlons that were withdrawn by the applicant(II%)and approved but not accepted(7%)were higher_ Cvrrall,loan application atiioils since 2010 only differ sligbtLy and rrflrrtslrntlat OUtEames as 2014. Outcome of aMkaklons by race and ethniclty,Figure V•4 prescrrLs more detail on the outcomes of loan applications,[Lxusingon differrnres in rare and ethnicity, The racial and ethhie groups with the h Ighest denial rate were Native Americans,with a denial rate of 20 percent,and Asian?,Aftican Americans and 11is"n.ics,all with a den iaJ rate of 16 percent,This cumparos to denial rate&14 prt-cent fir all loan applicants,Nativr Hawaiians/helflc Jslanders.White and Won•Fhspanlc residents had the lowest denial rate at 13 percent, The rnor"kv lending uutbumes shown in FigureV•4 differfrom national and state outwnwr In several ways.Flest,the difference Ln denials among African Americans and Whites was only 3 percentage points with more African Americans being denied than white residents,Nationally, Lhe denial rake in 2014 w4s 25 perrertt fur AfrLcan American applicants,compared to lust 14 percent of non•Hispafth!White applicants—a difference-of 15 percentage paints.Semnd,denial rakes for Asian applin n Ls in Ada County were also higher Alan that of white appiI ants;th Is was also hit thr case nationally. The HMDAa"lysis in the 3016518te of Ldaiw fair arousing analysis found rei LJvely high rates of denials for American Indian/Alaskan Native,,Hispanic and Native Flawawn/Pacd1c Islander applicants,Denial rates for othrr racial groups wrerc notsipnificantly different than thedrnlaJ rates for White applicants, BBC ROS AOCH&iaOrdUatmG SECIO eu,FrCal8 City of Meridian 57 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 96 of 242 figure V-4. Outcome of Mvr gage Loan Applications by Race and Ethnicity,Ada County,2014 Percent RIOR Ame iC,an Indldi}-of Alaske Nx-i a K% 4% dQk i 1 'a 1% Asian HN 3% 16% 1-0% Z% 912rkarAfrir ARwrk-w P% 3% 1W S% 4% HetNe Hawallanor pa{piC Islander 57% 5% 13% Lo% 5% wh9le 71% 4% 13h 10% 3% P&Mk" ahpank P% 5% 145% 9% 3W. Hon#Ihpohio 71% 4% 13% 10% 3% 0ionnAnnenrorif"FUDof6 arcr -1% x1l Zia Anrrrkon rndfon/Whffe wffrrcnew -&% 1 `. .LIA hrSS4ft4/-Wf-r�pukrvpa 4% ! IK Narr. Dxd w indwk lomL for rrrA la i1v pfo',eR"or-wn-o Nrerza{ji ii . 7wRr srilCtlMl%iR.WhrNlarrd QOG aexard#[agWhry. Loan originadon rates were somewhat slmilaracross racial and ethnic categories,all above 60 percent.Nadve American applicants had the lowest arlglnotion Late at64 percent Non-Hlspan1l: and White applicants had the highesr rates both at 71 percent. Idahal%Wkatiansbyn"and etftkiVr in the State of Idaho,AmerCan 3ndian}Alaska Native a pplicants had loans originated 5S percent of the time;Asian applicants,62 percenk;Afrlcan Americans,62 percent-,and Whl re applicants,166 percent.Hispanic borrowers had loans originated 50 percent oFtlie dme--elghtpercentage paints lower than non-Hispanic applicants, Across all races and ethnlcitles,Ada Counts loan originations were higher than that ofthe state. Outwmes and types of 10IMSr Loan denial rates earl also wary byrace and ethnldgy based on the type of loads appl led for by applicants.Denial rates are typlcaliy highest for home Improvement loans,often because the addltbonal debt will ra Ise the loan to value ratios above the levels allowed by flaanclal Instltudon, An examinatlon ofthe types4Yf leans applled for by applicants of varying races aW etbnicldes found that Native Ha-aiia n f Paclfic Islander applicants were much more likely than other applicants to app3y For home purchase loans(754G of loan appiicadons).White,Non-Hlspanhc and Hispanic appl scants had a lower rate of appllcatlans for home purchase loans(56%of loan applicatlons).Applications forborne improvement loans were lowamangoll races and ethnkltles,ranging Fmm 0 to 2 pero nt of applicadons.Among minority groups,Hispanic applicants were the most llkelyofa€lappReanits to apply for reflnancing loans,while Native Hawaiian fPaclfk Islanderappllcants were least likely to apply For refinancing loans. BBC R€S€,RCM&CONSULTING SECTION wr PAGE 9 City of Meridian 58 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 97 of 242 Figure V-5 dlspiays the dental rote by r�j4ts and ethn Iclty and lean purpose-Genlal rates For home purchases are reladveV low across radail and ethnic groups except for Native Arnerlcans and Naive Hawaiians/Facil-ic Islanders Home pu rchase denials are I-Iwent For WKite,RDn-Hispanic and 11415panJc 4arrowers.A5i01)rAfrl47an American and Hispanlcborrnwws experienced a denial rate of one-third for refinancing loans.In general,denlals were higher For home Impirovement and re53larictng loans,as these can hold more risk pun a home porchaue toan- Figure V-S. Ainui.au lyden N- 2 1% � Hume Flrr�islJxY Denial loV Rare and Ethnicity and nr N.r<ka Yeti IA 12% Loanu Purpose,Ada Centy,2014 � Home Imorcrarnent Nan,. --Wren, Asian 241: rxkid.,nnrirl rrl..„irrair,.wr Ihm ill Irumv1rr+ .33K m;de,WrKmd as WA Sams: RL:rk r,-Atriran J.3x SEC HM a Azw GaLb 241A and eeC Heaarstl American 8 33% tonsukht Naive Hwmiianar -40A4 Pac di;15l370Pr A 109G r% Write 3375 fir.{ HLspanlr. 1T95 4� '3A% JiX tkn I li>pan'r_ 'J3'n' }6K Ada County luau applicants were denied home purchase loans at about tht:same rate L14%) wmparrd tuapplicants nationally(13%)and higher than all applicants in the State of Idaho [lU%). outcomes and ino5me levels_F igu re V-6 examines differences in loan origination and denial rates by in-Lome range.As shown by Kgurr V•6,thv different,in approval rates was mordcst. except forLhe lowest inenmeapplicants. Figure V-6. M-0rtgage.Loan Application OrliAnti'DenWls by lutome teael,Ada County,201A Less than 50%MF1 -A% 29% rymr 50-M MR a% 16% Gras nu irr6udr tomstormuldraxe+ploperiasornon.o.rcr ooapaAm H13-106%MFI 73% 12% 100%MFI+ 72% 12% Sdrrcs: SEC la,Qe aye,Gales a63a ard sec Hnrarth a Wns�n� Reasons For denial.HMDA data Contain some inf-Omrattan on why Loans were denied,which can help to explain differences in denials arnongraclal aM ethnic groups,f7gurre V-7 shows Lbe reasons for denials to Ada County, BBC RE3E.AOCH&fArdU NNG SKI"V,PA6E10 City of Meridian 59 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 98 of 242 For all racial and ethnic categnries,high deq#-#o-inrome ratio and inadequate nr I►oortredit bimnrywere the tap reasons for denials, Inadequate ar poor employment hiswry and unverifiable information were very minorreasnns. There are many reasnns why loan originatic,n rates maybe lower far eerw in racial and ethnic groups,First.same racial and ethnic groups are very smalI.sn the pool of pmential harrowers is limped and may skew powands lower income hauseholds,sine minorities typicatty have t wer inenmes.Se4;pnd,min orityapplicanps are mere Iibely to notaccept their Inan offers,gven if they area pprfive,4-flitFereticeS in the mrnpletenes5 of Inain applications a nd withdrawal of applications by potential bgrrnwersalso affect the prig inodon rptPs Denial rates exhibit signlflcgnt variation aver Orne,ac,ordIng to the Fedeipl Reserve,drivgn by changes in demand€or ceMin types nF Inans,variation in borrower type and change-s i n cmdi t sMndard_S. Me finnallyrdenial rates on home purchase dpplicatiorus in 2014 was very low—even lower than daring the housing hnm years.The relatively low denial rape in 2014 is attributed to a drop in applications.from riskier applicants,perhaps related to tighteningofcredIt availability and Iendingstandards_ BBC RESEAAow&CONSULrIIG 51cnoN V,PAGE 21 City of Meridian p = Q p 60 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 99 of 242 Rtasonsfoe oaeislsof wan applications by Racrand Ethnicity of Applicant,ma county,20,14 Raw Al rtan Rnp'a wmavaraoo 0% N% 43% x5^x U% 14� 0s6 Oak Mir, 2% 5% 33% 36% YA 2% LO% 7% R ckor AFrrcanA—r — 0% 13% 25% 5O96 ]3% 0% 0% 0% NsUwm Ha II;nor Pw fK IPland,r "S Aa< �9% ]% ]9% 0% 0% 4hIlf 17% t3% 25% 27% 3% 3% 3% 9% emwrxy Hisp.— 13A 10% 25% 31% 0% 2% 1% 20% Mon-Mppnlc m 13% ZS% 27% 3% 3Afi 3% v% Nolr Pan mat hsMr4a��u3ra^+rrcrranvnwv>me ura�ts Salrn: FREC HYQL Rir par antl>til�antl BK Nrs¢srNBienaltiry. BBC RfSWrH&CONSuLTiNG SECTION v,PAGE 17 City of Meridian 61 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 100 of 242 B rim,@ loans.The•suhprime tending marketdKiined significantly fnilowing the howling market cPi�ci laationaliy,In 21T14,nnVahout 3 percent of Cnnveptinrpal horns purcha and percentof retina nce hens were f)ubprirne.l nterestingly,nationally,smali banks and credit urLinns were much more likely to nrlgi nate subprime Losses than were mortgage u mpan Ie-s or Large hanks in 20143 r3 In 2014.in Ada Cpunty,4.9 Percentafthe]oans were subprime.The average interest rate above the prime rate wars 3 peerent A hprrfawer with a suhprime rate would pay,on averaperahput $4rOOO lnnre per year than a prime rate Lwirrawer,orahout t120,HO oveT the IIFe of the loan- Given that tLie tpp reasnns For denials in the county were high d¢ht-tn-in,00me ratio and inadequate nr iwisr credit hi5tory—and comidering the high cost nFsuhprime Inans to a horrawer—this ks an area that the county should reuniter_ Summary Thissectian examine$pV Wie and private decisigees that.3ffecthnusing choice,including the pu blic provislon a nd reguLatinn of housing and a€ee5s to mortgage ti nanting.The primary fin[4kn,&5 include; ■ The procedures and practises of the Seise City/Ada{county Housing Authority,and the Cityr's lend use and coning regulation-,do not appear to create harriers to hnwiing choice and are 1p line with HUD regulations.Oespite the KAMAG weighd ng preferences equalklr among the elderly,disabled and tamilies with minor children,mane barriers to housing chin€e may exist he€atmp of physical inaccessihitity of hfwsing unitsr Lack of local services and agiing m iltifamiWunits thatar-e not being properly maintained ■ The differences in nio-rtgW loan denials among hnrrawers or varying races and ethnicities a re minor,particularly when Compared to denials nationally. Native American applicants have the highest gap in loan origination Tate#when carp pared to non-Hispanic Whibe applicants, For Che pw?mrs of th is sec mq'subprirne'is dlef ned w a Doan vri th an APR of mare then three peacerirtapx po m is abme comparable Treasuries—Thies isoonsislm Seth the intent of the I4deraiHesenmindefmmp'subprin- 'sntheIIMDhdata a krtp,/fwLvw.feAQalrese ve.gor{puWbulletio}2als/pdFrMt+-H MDAPEIP BBC REsE RCH&COMULTING -%cro N v,PAGE 13 City of Meridian 62 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 101 of 242 Public Notice PY19 Action Plan Idaho Statesman Keeping you connected I IdahoStatesman.com AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Al,... 2ea39e Gaed22"22 CITY CIF MERICN ARM NQTIGE OF PUBLIC HE MI Sa7.oa 2 d}i h Attention; Cryrtal Camoell VICTORIA RODELA being duly sworn. Uepmea end amya:That she is the CITY OF MERIDIAN Principal CWrIk tR The Isho 33 E 19ROADVVAYAVE SUITE 308 Siatesman,a daily newepeper wwrted MERld IAN,I❑836422619 and pueliMad a!Baae,Ada County. Stare of Idaho-,and hawing a general ar€ula&m therein,and which CEfY 4F 1110IC1Aff said narMsp.par I+i*heert NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARria ANO PlJ%JC COMMENT PERl6U Repending nLr'ridian's£Pltvinunlly Dguelepment Block Ctent cantinuoeglyanduninterruptedky DIEVGl Diagram published xt said County during a e city of rdEddion is desigtrated an Entillemrnt Cout.rruruttyy liy Use ll-5. t}eppaartmewt od Housing and Urban Development IMJD1,This pC110A 4f CN4hrG{AnSG4Wlly�rnpnlhg deslgrral ew slows 1 w City to recowe lunds arrnlraitt'kurn HUD s prior to Uhefrrst ptmbcakn of the COmmutip�t3euelpp Decal E9t9ck C+anl((l (tl Prpgam-The Cry art nalige.a cgpy er wKeh Is stlached pp�pppdteg th6t M FW receive an an.cahon Df$624,I62 om��oha 1 2C19-in order ra receiup these Furry ttre City must suhriut to 4b hareta:fti said no*A war*pjO*;hcd an ariniral Arfian pin identifying the projects and @Dais the City wil In The Idaha Statesman,in aonfarmrry undertake to create new jobs, increase allordahle arkJ actesdbla xdlh SeClion 94 149,IdeMO Code.�s Mud and revitalize Mentlian neilrfilborhpgds tl�ng lie no o-d frani YCar, amended,far. A.4 Ctii2ENS AIDE INVITER TO ATTENb AL trLAM t-46dfQt3 ON TUESDAY,JULY 1Gr 2819 AT&_t14P.Fll.n bee FAeridian City 1 lorartions Carmcil Chambers,Meridian Cky HeII,33 E-Broadhay Avenue,Merl Sate,Idaho,regardng the W113 ArAim Plan.A this rneebn Wei and rxillen prrtlit tamtepts will be XCOON.Specw Irtyl 1w IS Beginning issue Dr: O5f311�19 extended to persons ndh dsafhilitras,iesdenls M assisted harawg, and Mwidien busidesc Oro gropertlr 4xKerg.Merrdien QAy Hstl if,a Ending issue or. 46r3VNIO and capoe4 accesable faeiity- lndiyduaI5 rNuiing accargda lion of phT.,64,sight,or hearngg impairments ca largag%irrnrterpre- rafion please cnntacl the{Sty Mark at;2a81880.4433- AJI clhtens may review the drag plan and provide t2slimary copies of the*aFt Plan are available he@inrirg Ma 31,2419 al Um Meridian City vial n the Cammwarly aCadDlxnr�t 6Ip 6riiriwt,8N On We CItyS OW �46Q�i websile,htwAi'Cridianuty.orp{CdbP, A PuRic CpMMENT fEWO OPENED MAY 31, 2419 AND Legals clerk] 1Yl.L CMINK THRCIIOH JULY 19,2619. ❑wring this period, ,oral and written comments about the 2419 Action Plan will be- ac-cepted. IUI oDnarwrits sharld be addiessed to Crystal Cmpbel in ine W Com nily Deyelopnlent ocpartrnen4 vAro may be contact. ed by mat;City Of Fleri lin CaMurM 0 mint Depirwe9! On Hie MErt day of May In tine year of 33 E. Aye. Sit 162 Wrldian,IM:by t ng-(2001 apwg herare ne,a#Jtitary F�uhlle 489657�sI;I 8S8G 5A:or by e-rri*ecarnDDe.. Mwidla ntity,are, puitonally appeared bcrpre me 224822-4I V ctona Radish known or idenbw to me t4 ne the perean whose wane substribed So the wAhin instrument, and being by rust duly ewwrn, aWared lh�kr Me sgtelnents therein are true,end acknowladund to me Thal ehe axeaurad the acme. for the stale of ..:--- terra,re' ut patios CCt q "r`.. SFEFMISCOTf BEARD 4 a'# - MyNotarY IQ N OWSZ9a41 ti;- Vagina Wob Erlra charge Mrloct or tlupscatr alM1tlrvle. Legstlo—r1:plea..ci nord..rrW City of Meridian 63 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 102 of 242 AFFIDAVIT Or PUBLICATION 351462 E903014 STATE OF ID HO } )SS. I MERIDIAN,CITY OF County of Ada ) 33 E. BROAD AY AVENUE Sharon jessen MERIDIAN 11)83642 of Nampa, Carryon County, Idaho, being first duly sworn,deposes and says: l.That I am a cities of the United Stales, and at Al limes hereinafter mentioned was ever the age of cigbittw t years,and not a parry to thm abuvt"Titled action. S. That TAM die Principle Clerk of the eridiath Press, a weekly newspaper published in the City of Meridian, in the County of Ada, State of Idaho;that LEGAL NOTICIE the said newspaper is in gericra3 circulation in the said Grunty of OITY OP hltr-flIDdIAN Ada, and in Rho vioiriity of FIOTiCE of PUBLtC MEARING AND PUBLIC Mcrtditln, andIi beerT COMMENT PFRIOD R"dFdlr%Moridlen's Cummuhlly Dlayerapn+ard rlrrirrtemptedly published in said bck 4rpnl(CBt�`], Rrognal Cowity during a period of seventy-eight The City of Mbridan Is tlaslpgin�iotl an Enaidemenl cammu• consecutive weeks prior to the first mantl(HUD)T hie detr 4 atnaosmapews find city ro TeccDBveel a peiblicaiiatt of this notice,a copy of iundc annwov morn tiuv"q Community Development 910pk which is hereto attacaled, am"'I (CL*J q Pra9rarn. The CRY ankipaiea mw It w11r re- C*im an alloeat-bn or$424.t62 on oc oiler 1,.2ol9-In Order 3, Thar the notice, of wMrh the annexed is fo receive 1"9 luntls,the Ctly must subrrlri 150 HUD an an- a printed copy, xrk£published iti.said irkwill u d Ilttaake Ito create new�toyyo pr mms and gOble tin ciry ac, rrcwspaper ] dme(s)in the regular and cagglbfe h Mktg,and reAael Wridllan relghl hloadRdUur- Inu the next Program YB&r- Clrtl issue of said paper, and was pfin M in the newspaper proper,and not ALL FIEARir4a CITIZENS TUESDAY, JULY 1.6. 2619 EAT,9 P.M. In in supplement, the Meridian Clty Council Chambers, I`Asntlian city Hall, 33 That said notice was published The fol lowing; E. Broadway Avenue, Mpridlen• Idaho reggarding the 2dig I USf3IfiA19 Aoctim Plan. At this nloetiry erlf ono wriNen pubic com. i naenrg will ha a"OepPtteed-Spec [InultarlDn r&exterxigd io per. sons wilh dlgObiliiise. residents of esalsled havMng gr4d Mad;Gan bul6me andproperry UWFAM, Meridian City Hall Is a harrgirspp 4 aacaaslNIP iarrllly, Indlvidiimh r"ng aC• *TA�F-0F I D A I olnmodatlan of pptt��yyait 1, sighT, or hear�p lmpalrmenta or w ry Gf Cant' rang 41ga2D n1orpreietron plaaw Conrail the C ly GM ai(246) T3 4A93. All tilxans may review the draft plan and provide On this 31 st day of May in the year of lZIARY eairmony. Co.2010pies Dr the drall Ilan era available beginning N19 before me a Notary Public,personally appvn-d ve3opmeA Doperint ihe Meridian Orr'theeet y�sa Copp wehsib@,WCVcdb $Irarnn Jensen, knovrn'Dr identified go me to be the person whose name is subscribed i +l PUBLIC 001414ENT PERIOD QnNruD MAY 31, 2o19 AND WILL CONTINUE THRWQH JULY IS.2019. Dudng to the witlsirt instrument,and being by me first thm perfad. Drill and wrlgen mimmonts shpul the 2419 Aucupn duly sworn,declared that the statements Therein Flan will be sceepled.AN Commenlg should be eddmsged tpGr" are true,and acknowledge To ate Thai IFcfshc erHn�ni,rA ea.Onllay he con artery by maa;Development 19+ execut the same. Jk ammunllyy Dave MGM 0eparbngN,33 E. Filraadway Ail,B. J Siaio2• Mar 1, ID 1L'�6by by prr6ne: 01)B)499-Q575;by 1 Tax: {20� 886.6T15.d; ar by TOO Notary Pta dsho *,.x ,F.X M. May 81,201g 199Ct0r4 Residing bt Canyon County ��x�,• N My oriuriission expires OW'28l2U23 ? f. Q wt OF 101-111%, City of Meridian p a g e 64 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 103 of 242 PY19 Action Plan Amendment Idaho Statesman CITY OF MERIDIAN NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEAAf#G AND PUBLIC CD MR%Pfr PEMOD 1Regardrr+f IAen4an's Conan rntMrlty Devaelopmem Black Grant(CDBQ Pro am The Cry 21 l d<ar- Fd5 been des Hated an Eittttleow, Canty mun4ty tpy b* us OepartTW4 pl HO(JSMJ ante Urban Dewelap ment I1 1. Ths desgration al- loans the sty to recehe h-Ms an• rally Isom HIJUs Comrnundy De."rnmt Elenclt Grant 10DWI Program The CRY pmpofm 10 U bM4 an amen4e0 1 Doo Plan tp. Pry grim Year 2019 IP'Y I91_ Dur PYl 4 ADC gas an ar $180,000 to uWade the E. Tbud IWV-Way. W other lands me now a+r<ailable so NDC nNarum Ov 41tt1010a There were aw w Mal orolects that caftwMed un*r bxxt of durng PY1 , *arring $69,376 Ln CDR fu"d5 unspent. The arnerdrnerd wil idenhk bow the kund5 wil be ri!,tlix,vied AtL C[TOW ARC WVffED to OWO a Pubitc heann on Ines, day,Apal 7,2020,at 6,00 PAL, m the Aierrdan Crty Cared Chambers,kletiti'C Hall, 33 E. Btaadt+ay,Mandan.Idaho,re` Batding the PYJ9 AmeMed k. Sion Plait Smoal ,rwttattan is ea- lended to Dersms wth asaW- Ms, resdeffts aI am toed hm5- rng, and Mendw business and PMWv CvMrs. VIRP& , City Kii IS a harllTrr:aMd aCeessible tuft ktdn+duals rewrng ac. cam d,ahon of Asrcal, s ht, or hearing �rrrpatrmersts ar iao- guage int4i!rpretahon please'Cfv lac#the Uy Clerit at t2€361 W& 4433 all C1Efmm MUM She atnenood Adno plan and proa&teswony Copes at the dratted k-oon Wan writ be aua4 ble beglnnng March 6, 2020 at the Indian city Comrnun6y De- velopmertt Depar;rwd ar5d on the CAy, Cry; ti;-!-trrtr ft/n •xraw.rrltrtp,- A PWLIC cw1~+ LUT PERIOD WILL SE OPEN FROM MARCH b, 2020 M RWM THE PU9- I.IC HEARING ON APRL 7, 2020, Olrtng thr9 trerlod, al com arts shatttd be adr#essed to Crystal Campbell at ccarnpbel omen[iarxzty.arg, 12Mm 484 0575. or at C+ty cd Merdtan, Commundy De�tdopm,&A DE!part- ment, 33 E. Broadway,Mendial, ID 33642 ll4btlbWW1 City of Meridian P a g e 65 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 104 of 242 Idaho Press Tribune LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF MERIDIAN NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD Regarding Meridian's Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) Program The City of Meridian has been designated an Entitlement Community by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This designation allows the City to re- ceive funds annually from HUD's Community Development Block Grant(CDBG)Program The City proposes to submit an amended Action Plan for Program Year 2019(PY19).During PY19 MDC was awarded $180,000 to upgrade the E. Third Rlghf-of-Way, but other funds are now available so MDC rescinded the funding. There were also several projects that completed under bud- get during PY18, leaving $69,376 in CD8G funds unspent. The amendment will identify how the funds will be reallocat- ed. ALL CITIZENS ARE INVITED to attend a public hearing on Tuesday, April 7, 2020. at 6:00 P.M., in the Meridian City Council Chambers, Meridian City Hall, 33 E. Broadway, Meridian, Idaho, regarding the PY19 Amended Action Plan. Special invitation is extended to persons with disabilities,res- idents of assisted housing, and Mendlan business and prop- erty owners. Meridian City Hall is a handicapped accessible faality. Individuais requiring accommodation of physical, sight, or hearing impairments or language Interpretation please contact the City Clerk at (208) 888-4433. All citizens may review the amended Action Plan and provide testimony. Copies of the drafted Action Plan will be available beginning March 2, 2020 at the Meridian City Community Development Department and on the City's CDBG website, httn:!lwww.meridiancity.ora cdbo A PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD WILL BE OPEN FROM MARCH 6, 2020 THROUGH THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 7, 2020. During this period, all comments should be addressed to Crystal Campbell at ccamobell@mendianci- or ,(208)489-0575,or at City of Meridian. Community De- velopment Department, 33 E.Broadway. Mendian.ID 83642. March 6.2020 1999832 City of Meridian 66 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 105 of 242 Website C A rneridiancity.org/cdbg/ (��,VERJDIAN�- Residents Business City Government Stay Informed Search PY19 Action Plan Amendment The City is amending the PY19 Action Plan to reallocate funding. There will be a public hearing during the 6 pm Council meeting on April 7,2020. This is open for public comment from March 6,2020 to April 7,2020. Please send all questions and comments to Crystal. • Presentation use arrow keys to click through presentation • Summary of Amendment • Draft of Amended Action Plan City of Meridian 67 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 106 of 242 Resolution PY19 Action Plan City of Meridian P a g e 168 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 107 of 242 0TV OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 19-2156 BY THE CITY C OUNCIL: BERNT,BORTON,CAVENER,MILAM, LITTLE ROBERTS,PALMER A RESOLUTION APPROVINGr ADOPTION OF THE', COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM YEAR 2019 ACTION PLAN AND SUBMISSION TO THE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DFVL?WPI4iEIYT; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AND ATTEST TFIF., SAME ON BE, OF TIME CITY OF MERIDIAN; AIND PRDYIDING AN EFFEOTI F, DATE. WHEREAS,, it is necessary that an annual action be submitted to the United States Dcpartment of Housing and Urban Development("HUD") in order to receive Community Devclopnncnt Black Grant("CDDG`) Funding far the Prograin Year 019;and WHEREAS, the City hc1d a public hearing on the Program Year 2019 Action Plan on July 16,2019,and held a public comment period on the draft application materials from May 31,2019 to July lb,2019; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY GOUNC,<1, OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAIIO: Section 1. That the Program Year 2019 Action Plan, and its certification docurn r;nEs, copies of which are allaclied hereto as EXHMIT A and incorporated herein by rcferenor,be, and the game hereby are,adapted its to both form and content. Section 2. That the Community Development Program Coordinator be,and hereby is, authorized to submit such Program Year 2019 Action Plan to HUD, Section 3. That thr Mayor and the City Clerk be, and they licreby are.,authorized to respectively execute and attest the certifying documents far the Program Year 2019 Action Plan for and on behalf of the City of Meridian. Section 4.That this Resolution shall be in full force and et1`ec1 immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of City of Meridian,Idaho this 2 3 4 day of July,2019. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this iiwday of July, 2019, AYI"TI`(JVED: 60 T?'MST: May Tammy de Weerd #4 ' ris y Clerk ti Of H49.7 RESDLIJUC&ADOPTING CDBG DOCUIVENTS—Peggy. I OF I PY19 Action Plan Amendment City of Meridian 69 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 108 of 242 SF 424s and Certifications City of Meridian P a g e 170 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 109 of 242 OMB Nwnbcr 40404D004 Expiration Ztaie:12M 1 M1 P Apglioatlon for Fadaral Assistance SF-424 1.Type 0Submissir:n '2.Type ctAppli allon: tfRrnmkseleclappmpdaleleltenaY LJ Preappllrallon New ®Ap*-Wlon CoollnuLmi0n +ariSPe rl Ch9rgedlCorr9ct9d Application L_I FRevlslon 13.dale Retelved! d.AppllrarN I&nbW. 5&Federal Enlity Identllier 5h.Federal Award Idenlinar: 0 19-3iiC-i5-OR106 51WW Use Only: S.DabeReoeNed by MAE E= 7 Slabe Apolk:alipla Idenliner: E.APPLICANT INFORMATION; 'a LeyelNarnff Oily aL Hexidian •h.EmplayerfTeup%%r IaerrtNieallon Number(EIHJ VS ; `t.Orgenleallonei E>l.N& �2-6�60�R5 02QT513670000 d,Addrw6: 'Slr4md; 193 S. ;MLPa4We ly ham- — —— SI(tE12. 'otty- etidian CmntyoP9dr.h; 'ewe: I ; Idaho PrpAm `Combry_ USA: UNITED STATES 'Zip!Paeiel Cade: 83642-ZU14 a,Orgdnirallonal Unit: DapQnm&d 148n5e- Di7i9ion Narae: omunity oevralapmlant I Planning f,Name and contaCt ipiormatlom of person to he conladed on mafRera 1wmMP1g thr#applkadon: p%fim: 13r Fir5l.Nwnc' Ceysbtll Mkldle Name: 'Lasl Nome, tmrrphell SUrax: TIIIe: oov--y Uevalopnent exogxam Coordinatae ¢eganlaallonal Afffawx L2y of Meridian TelepiromNumGer 209-"9-41575 Fa.Numt+er 208-838-6859 'rMal. ccampbell@rmridiancity-oro City of Meridian 71 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020- Page 110 of 242 Application for Federal Assist@nce SF-424 '9,T� a of Applleant 1:Salad Appllcant Type: G City ar Township Gpvcrroncnr. _ v� Typo of Applkant�Saled A,ppl lcarrL Type. Type oTAppbmW3:iledApplksMTlpe. Dlh�[spca'lfyk 10.Nome of Federal Agency: [United States nepaYtment of eavaittg and Urban Develops nt 11.Calito�of F�dOrAl POIfWYtIG AsislilanagTiwnbar. CFM TRIa: 12.Fudding OPporlunHy Humber 1�_sle •nre� cawunxty PQvqlopment Block Grants/Entitlement GranL 13.13ompet4tlon IdenLiflesuan Number: TiUe: — 14.Araos Aff rigid qy PFOi4cl{CNiea,Gouniies,Stales. Ads!Ajtecirmenl L'o-elete Alt.hmenk I Ylew FkFtactlmerN `1b,ReiGripWo Tlllo of AppliGant`i Prgiwd. lnveet funds to createJekeatain auiteble living envirouanent3, axpand affC�adsbLe horsing ppGrtU75itiee, elimirake hlv and blight, and adainiltwr u+rtdkan'a CDBG EntitiMe,nt erogxete, Atlbch wppxWq&amrrants as specified ieapeno{Irtsirucuone. AddAitachnants I DeteleAgachmen� VIeWAftenMeiit City of Meridian P a g e 72 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 111 of 242 Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 16.Conpreaslonal Dilairdctb OF. 'aApplicam 1-ie `b.PragraaVP+viect 1 !D Allwh an addWmal list of Progr;vNP*alcr3 GonIpU$siprral disbiel$if upeded. A4011vahmerit aele4e Atlachrnent Wi Atlachrnenl 3 17.Prop954d Protect a.9tertbarac 1D}6112019 'b,Fndlla4a oglaa{2ozc 18.Eallmeted Funding js] a.Federal �27 r 162-d0 t.Appiranri r: $I*lo D-DO d.LOLaI 6,Db "e.Other b-60 f. PnVam Income U,Q4 'I.TOTAL d2d,162-00 19-Is Appolcmlon SLbkeet to rteview Hy State Onder Exeeutiue Order 12372 Proeeaa7 a.7fgs apprcatlon was rnudemad8ble to the Siale under the Exemdlva-Order 12372 Process for reiAmv an L] b.Program is sublacl 10 E.O.12372 bul rkn not been selecW by the Static for reL}5w. ® c.Program is not covared by E0, 12372. 'OL Ie the Appilcent Delinquent On Any Federal debt? (If"Yva,"prowl'-do exPlaratlon In attachment) El Ydss N NU rf'Yes",provide explena 11w aril attach Add Atlachmenl [yelete Ailachmem I View Allai":ff l 21-`ey sig,nlag Ihla appileatian,I earthy(1)to the sratemanis comalned In the list of oert4frcatbane a nd;2)that via state menu hereln are true, complete and aeeurata to the bast of ndlr knowledge. i also pFowWa tho required assurances" and agrwo to sornply with any remelting terms if I acwFAa.n award,I ism 8wir0 Mal Orly fa Ise,ttNitlpu#,or iraudu6ent 3t2iemente ne olaIms inay aubJcttfno to trimbn ll,clwp,or idrtllnistrelive penalties.ILLS.Coder Title 218,5eetl1511 1001) 0 "I AGREE "TtNO isl or P9rilrh t"wo amarances, or an Idernel alte where you may cMn Ihla Ifsk Is owtalne:t In the anmuocen*nt or agency m*dfio ineirudlions. Aillgorited IInreaeotatim Prefix: 'FIretl4arne[ Teirwy Law Noma do xoard Suffi c '71IIa: Hagar 'YEtephornetlun*er 208-998-d933 FoxN„r*or 246^684-8723 'fwil: tdesreezd@nezridiancfty,ar4 'Signatue otAnHhorlaed ftepreaeniallve: 'OebrSignad: City of Meridian 73 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 112 of 242 CERTWICATIONS In accordance with the applicable statutes and the regulations governing the consolidated plan regulations, the jurisdiction certifiesthat- Affirmatively Vurttier Fair Housing--The jurisdiction will affirmatively further fair housing- Uniform Relocation Act and Anti-displacement and Relocation plan -- It will comply with the acclulsition and relocation requirements of-the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970,as amended,(42 U.S.C.4601-4655)and implementing regulations at 49 C:FR Part 24_ It has in effect and is following a residential anti-displacement and relocation assistance plan required under 24 CFFR Part 42 in connection with any activity assisted with funding under the Community Development Block Grant or HOME programs, Anti-Lobbying--To the best of the jurisdiction's knowledge and belief, 1, No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid,by or on behalf of it,to any person for influencing or attempting to i nfluence an officer or employee of any agency,a Member of Congress,an officer or employee of Congress,or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any H edoral contract,the making of any Federal grant,the making of any Federal loan,the entering into of any cooperative agreement,and the extension,continuation,renewal, amendment,or modification of any Federal contract,grant,loan, or cooperative agreement; 2, if any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency,a Member of Congnss,an officer or employee of Congress,or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant,loan,or oeoperative agreement, it will compiete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Farm to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions-, and 3. It will require that the language of paragraph 1 and 2 of this anti-lobbying certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including sub-contracts,subgran% and contracts under grants,loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all submcipients shall certify and disclose; accordingly. Authority of Jurisdiction--The consolidated plan is authorized under State and local law(as applicable) and the jurisdiction possesses the legal authority to carry out the programs for which it is seeking funding, in accordance with applicable HUD regulations. Consistency with plan—The housing activities to be i zXdettaken with Community T7evQlopment Block Gtam,HOME,Emergency SoIution.,! Grant, and Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS funds are consistent with the strategic plan in the jurisdiction's consolidated plan, Section 3--it will comply with section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968(12 U.S.0- 1701u)and implementing regulations at 24 C:FR Part €35, . ak Signkure of Auth ircd Official Date ML�or Title City of Meridian 74 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 113 of 242 Spec Mc Community Development Block Grant Certitleations The Entitlement Community certifies that: Citizen Participation-- It is in full compliance and fallowing a detailed citi7cn participation plan that satisfies the requirementsof24 CFR 91,105_ Community Development Flua --Its consolidated plan identifies community development and housing needs and specifies both short-term and long-term cotntnunity development objectives that that have heen developed in accordance with the primary objective of the CDBG program (i.e., the development of viable urban communities,by providing decent housing and expanding economic opportunities, primarily for persons of low and moderate income)and requirements of 24 CFR Farts 91 and 570_ Following a Plan -- It is following a current cotnsolidated plan that has been approved by HUD. Use of Funds -- It has complied with the following criteria; 1.Maximum Feasible Pnori!Y_ With respect to activities expected to be assisted with CDBG funds,it has developed its Action Plan so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit law-and moderate-income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or Might_ The Action Plan may also include CDBG-assisted activities which the grantee certlftes are designed to meet other community development needs having particular urgency because existing conditiom pose a seriogs and immediate threat to the health or w0fare of the commu pity, and other financial resourccs are not available (see Optional CDBG Certification). 2. Overall Benefit. The aggregate use of C',DBCi funds, including Section 108 guaranteed loans, during program year(&)} ,� 0 1 I0 _ La period specified by the grantee of one, two,or three specifie consecutive program years],shall principally benefit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that at]cast 70 percent of the amount is expended for activities that benefit such persons during the designated period, i I Assessments. It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG funds,including Section 108 loan guaranteed funds,by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of lour arid moderate income, including any fee charged or assessment tnade as a condition of obtaining access to such public Improvements. However, if CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of a fee or assessment that relates to the capital costs of public improvements (assisted in part with C;DBG funds)financed from other revenue sources,an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds. In additiory,in the case of properties awned and occupied by moderate-income(not low-income) families,art assessment ar charge may be made against the property for public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds if the jurisdiction certifies that it lacks CDBG funds to cover the assessment. Excessive Force-- It has adopted and is enforcing: 1. A policy prohibiting the use of exccssi ve force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations; and 2, A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject oi"such non-violent civil.rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction. City of Meridian P a g e 75 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 114 of 242 Complinnee with Anti-discrimination laws--The grant will be conducted and administered in conformity with titt-E VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 TJS,C.2000d)and the>~air I loilsing Act(42 U.S.C.3601-3619) and implementing regalaotions, L&W-Based Paint--Its activities concerning lend-based paint will comply with the requirements of 24 CFR Part 35, Subparts A,B, J,K and R. Compliance with Laws--It will compIy with applicable laws_ Auth zed 0 caal rate Title City of Meridian 76 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 115 of 242 APPENDIX TO CERTIFICATIONS INSTRUCI-IONS CONCERNrNG LC>.EiFiYTNG CERMCAT[ON: Lobbying Certification Tlris certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certific-atiori is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352,title 31, U.S.Code, Any person who fails to file the Mquired certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than$10,000 and not more than$100,000 for each such failure. City of Meridian 77 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 116 of 242 pM8 Approver No,0348-0042 ASSURANCES-CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS F5ubllc reporting burden far this aoile,cticn of inMrmEkUon is estimated to average 15 minurlea per responsa, inctuuing tlme for reviewing Instpictions, searching exieling data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed,and ownpleting and reulewing the collection of information- Send comments regarding Me burden esiirna bo or any other Aspect of the collectlon of Infomtatlon, including allKeations far reducing this burden,to the Office of Management and Rvoet,Paperwork Raduetion Prcgoct(034&0442),Washington,DC 205433- PLI=ASE p0 NET RETURN YOUR CDMPLETED FORM TO THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDG LT. SFND IT TO THE ADDRESS PROVIDED BY THE SPONSORING AGENCY. NOTE; Canaln of these assurances may not he, applicable, to your protect or program, tf you have quBaticrns, please contact trio Awarding Agency. Furlher, certain raderal asslalance awarding agencies may require npplieants to cerllfy to addltloml assuranaaa-If such is thL%casi§,you will ba nodf]ed. As the duly authored representatisre aI Ilse,applirarrL I certlify tlxat the applicant; t. Has the legal authortty to apply for Federal easiOanea, 8. Willi! wnply *th His InUrgovarnmontal Personnel Act and the Insti ttillonal, managerial and ilrnnndel capabllfty of 1117(1(42 U-S.C.�§472F�-4763)relating to prescribed (Including funds au�icient io pay tho nor-FedVal share srandnrds for meat systems for programs Funded of prgect cow#) to ensure proper planning, under one of the 19 statutes or regulations spe,cined in marlagamerrt and ownplation of the project described in Appendix A of OPM's Standards far a Merit Systom of this applicatlon. Personnel Administration{6 C-F-R-O,Subpart F). 2. WIN give the awarding sgency,the Comptroller General 9. Wirt comply with the Lead-Based Paint Paiiswwing of the United States and, it appmpriata, the State, Preverkikm Act (42 U.S.C, §§QO1 et seq.) which through any autharizad represerntAvo, access to and prnhlblts the Lisa of lead-based paint in construction cr the righl be examine a1I records. books, papers, or rehabllllatkk n of residence structures. documents related to the assistance;and win estahlii-.h a proper aomunling system in accordance with 10. Wil comply wilh ail Fabaral statutes relating to non- generally accaptPd accounting staredards or agency d isarlminaticn. These Include but ate riot Iimlled Ili): (a) directive, Titla VI of the C 4 Rights Act of 1964 (P.r.- 8a-�52) which prohlb is discrlmina#Ion on the bask of race, 3- Will riot clisposs of, modlfy the use of, or change the calar of national origin; (b) Tdle, IX of the Pducallon farms of the real property title, or other intiarest In uric Amandmenti-i of 1972,as amended(20 U.3,C, %1681 slte and facilities without pBrmirriDn and Instructions 1683, And i685-1659), Which prohiblts discrimination from the awarding agency. 1^AII record the Federal on trio basis of sex; (c) Section 504 of the interest in the bua of real property In accordance with Rehabllltatlon Act of 1073, as amended (29 U.3-C- awarding agency dlrwtfms and will include a covenant §794), which prohiblla discrimination on the, basls of In tha title of real property aquired in whole ar in part handicaps; (d) the Age DiscrimirLatlon Act of 1975, as Ah Federal assistance funds to assure non- amended (42 U-S.C. z 6101-fi147), which prohibits dlscriminatiion during the uaeful 0a of the project. discrimination on the basis of age;(e)the dn,g Abuse Offce and Treatment Avt of 1872 (P-L. 92-2555), rig 4. Will comply with thi§ requirements of the assistance amended,relating to npndismiminabo11 on rho basis of awerdin g agency with regard to the drafting, review end drug abuse; (f)the Garnpreherrslve Atcohol Abuse and approval of construction plans and specificaliorrs. Alc-oholism Prev nlicn, treatment and RehabltRadon Act of 1970 (P.L- 91-616), as amended, relallmj to 5. WIII provide and maintain ccmperent and adequate nondiscriiminatlon on the basis of alcohol abuse oT engineering aupervislolt at the constructlon site to alcohollsm; (g) �§623 and 527 of the Public H6elth ensure then the onmplete work ocnfarma with the 9ervlce Aol of 1(J12(42 LI.s-C.§§291)dd 3 and 2K ea approved plans and speafcations and wlrl furnish 3), as amended, relelfng to oorrfidantlallty of aaoohol progress reports and auch other infprrneticrn as may be and drug abuse patient records; (h) Tltle VII1 of the required by the assi2stance awarding agency or Stara. Ci,ril Rights Act of 1068(42 U.S-C-%3601 et seq.),as ametdi§d, relating to nondlscrlmInartion in the wile, 6. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicat)Ie rental or financing of hqusing; (F) any other time frarne aftor receipt of approva3 of the awarding ncndiscrimirladw prrvisiorns In the spedflc statut (s) agency. under which application for Federal assistance Is being made; antl, 0) the fequlromants of any other 7. WII4 establlsh seieguards to prohibit emp"@s from nondisc rnknatlon statutes) which may apply to the u9irrg (heir positions for a purpose that oorslitute or appllcallon, presaalts the appearance of personal or orcjanize&nnl conflict of Interest,or personal gain- slbnoanl Form 42.40 iltev.7-971 Prevlourt Editlem tlsabne Autho fixed for Local Reproduction Preasrlbcd by OMB ClrCulxr A.-1 a2 City of Meridian n - - - 178 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 117 of 242 11, Will pimply, or has already complied, with the National Environmental MIcy Art of 1969 (F.L. 91- requiremanls of Titles II and tll of the Uniform Ralocalfon 190) and Executive Order (EO) 11514; (b) natificatlon Assistance arid Real Pmperly Acquisition Paliciaa Act of of vlolatlrtg facilitiea puremant to EO 11738; (c) 19710 (P,L, 914a46) which prpvide for fair and oquItable protection of wetlands pursuant to l=d 1199[r {d) Ireat mint of persan5 displaced or whose property is evaluation of flood hazards to iloodplalns In accordance acquired ac a rasutt of Faderal and federally-assisted with EO 119U, (e) assuranoa of project cormiwtnncy programs- These requirements apply to all interests in real with Irm approved State rnwnwgement programs property aoqulrsd for project purposes regardless of developed under the Coastal Zane Management Act of Federal participation in purchases- 1872 (16 U.3,C, MT451 of seq-Y (f) Owformity of Federal actions ID state {Clean Air} Implementallon 12. Will comply with the providorw of the Fla"Act(6 U-S,C, Plana under Section 175(c) of the Clean Air Act of �51501-1508 and 7324-732B) which limit the political 1955, as amended (42 U-S,C. §§7401 et seq.); (9) ectivitias of ampioyees whose principal employment pratactiun of underground sources of drfnking water activllles are funded In whole or in part with Federal funds. unbar the Safe Drinking Wader Art of 1974, as amended (P,L. 93-523J and, (h} protection of 13- Will cornply, a 3 applicable,vnth]ha provisions of the Davls- enda ngered species under the Endangered Spacles Act Baron Act(49 U-s.C-§§2Ma 60 276a-7),the Copeland Act of 1973,as amended(PA-t13-2105)- (40 U.S.C. §27Dc and 19 U.S-C- §§874),and the Caltrart Wwk Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. %'327- 16- Will comply with the WIId and Scenic Rivera Act of 333) regarding labor standards for Federally-assisted 1968 (16 U.S.C.§§1271 et seq-) related to protecting construction subagreements, componerns or potential ccmPonents of iho national wild and scanlQ Fivers 5yetem- 14- WII1 comply with Flood insurance purchase faqulremants of Sertirn 11)2(a)of the Flood Disastmr Protecffon Act of 1973 17- Will assist tha awarding agency In assuring owplianog (P.L_ 93-234) which mqulres reoipierts in a spevial Soad with Sadion 106 of the Nalional Historic Pmsmveiibn hazard crud to pith ft;ilmte iii Li iv vikiwE,11 w1J to Hula)-Y-8 Act of 196G,ae amended(16 U.S-C. 5A70�, E4 11503 hood Insurance iF the total Drat of irrsurabla construction (identlFlcEOun and proteckm of historic propsrlles} and and acq uisbm Is$10,000 or morr}. the Archaeological and Hlv mrJc Presmatlon Act of 1974(16 U-S.C-§ 169a-1 at seq.). 15. +non comply with environmental standards which mwy be presalbed pursuant to the fpllrming= (a) institution of 1 B- Will cause to be performed the required fnencial end arwlronmental quality control measures under the compliance audits in avmrdanca with trie Sfrgle Audit Act Amendments of 1990 and OMS Circular No.A-133, 'Audile of states, Lopl Governments, and felon-Profit Orgsinizatiurrs.' 19, Will comply with all applirwtals requirements o1 all other Federal laws,execulive orders,regulations,and polldes governing thin program. SIGNATURE Ot AUTAefEED CERTIFYING OFFICL4L TITLE �- -- Mayor APPLICANT ORGANIZATQN DATE 5u9Mf1-TED City of Merwlan 7f24f19 SF-424d(Rau 7-97)gacfc City of Meridian - 79 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 118 of 242 E IDIAN --- IDAHO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Agenda Item Number: 6 G Item Title: Meeting Notes: CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 20-2191 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, HOAGLUN, PERREAULT,AND STRADER A RESOLUTION APPROVING ADOPTION OF A SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ANNUAL ACTION PLAN FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2019; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AND ATTEST THE SAME ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; AUTHORIZING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM COORDINATOR TO SUBMIT THE SAME TO THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,pursuant to the regulations of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development("HUD"), it is necessary to complete and submit to HUD a substantial amendment of an Action Plan for a city's Community Development Block Grant("CDBG") program when a change in a city's allocation plan redirects more than 20 percent of annual funding to a different activity; and WHEREAS, the City held a public hearing on the attached substantial amendment to the Action Plan for Program Year 2019 ("PY19") on April 7, 2020, and held a public comment period on the draft application materials from March 6, 2020 to April 7, 2020; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO: Section 1. That the amended PY19 Action Plan, as attached hereto,be, and the same hereby is, adopted as to both form and content. Section 2. That the Mayor and the City Clerk be, and they hereby are, authorized to respectively execute and attest the certifying documents for the amended PY19 Action Plan. Section 3. That the Community Development Program Coordinator is hereby directed to submit the amended PY 19 Action Plan to HUD. Section 4.That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of City of Meridian, Idaho this 14th day of April , 2020. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 14th day of April , 2020. APPROVED: ATTEST: By: Mayor Robert E. Simison Chris Johnson, City Clerk RESOLUTION ADOPTING CDBG DOCUMENTS—Page I OF I Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 120 of 242 (�E IDI y ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item - 6.G. Presenter: Crystal Campbell Estimated Time for Presentation: 5 Title of Item - Resolution 20-2191: A Resolution Approving Adoption Of A Substantial Amendment To The Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan For Program Year 2019; Authorizing The Mayor And City Clerk To Execute And Attest The Same On Behalf Of The City Of Meridian; Authorizing The Community Development Program Coordinator To Submit The Same To The United States Department Of Housing And Urban Development; And Providing An Effective Date Council approval and adoption of resolution Council Notes: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Upload Date Resolution to Approve Substantial Amendment Resolution 3/5/2020 REVIEWERS: Department Reviewer Action Date Clerk. Johnson, Chris Approved 4/8/2020 -8:49 AM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 119 of 242 WI IDIAN --- IDAHO Planning and Zoning Public Hearings Staff Outline and Presentation Meeting Notes: Changes to Agenda: None Item #6H: Blue Valley Elementary School (H-2020-0023) Application(s):  Vacation (modification to plat note for Southridge Sub. #1) Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site is located on the west side of S. Linder Rd., just south of W. Overland Rd. History: The final plat was approved by City Council in 2008. Summary of Request: The Applicant proposes to amend plat note #17 on the recorded plat for Southridge Subdivision No. 1, which prohibits direct lot or parcel access to S. Spanish Fork Way, to allow an exception for Lot 2, Block 2 to have two (2) accesses for the proposed elementary school. The two accesses are proposed to accommodate an ingress-egress for school buses and parent pick- up/drop-off lanes. The proposed change to the plat note would still restrict access to the collector street for other lots in the subdivision. The final plat approved by the City Council in 2008, did not include a note prohibiting direct lot access to S. Spanish Fork Way, a collector street. Note #16 on that plat stated, “Direct lot access to S. Linder Road and W. Overland Road is prohibited.” Prior to ACHD signing the plat, they required the Applicant to modify the note to add a restriction prohibiting direct lot access to S. Spanish Fork Way. Even though the City didn’t require the restriction, because it is on the plat, the Ada County Surveyor requested City Council, along with ACHD, approve the proposed modification prior to removal of the note from the plat. A TIS was submitted to ACHD for review with the request for modification to the plat note. Although ACHD policy does not allow the proposed accesses, Staff recommended a modification of policy to allow only one driveway onto Spanish Fork Way 400’ north of the roundabout. Only the northern access for school buses & staff was approved due to the following reasons: 1) there wasn’t sufficient justification in the TIS for two driveways; 2) the southern driveway is proposed to be located on the departing leg of the roundabout and drivers are typically accelerating as they exit and are not prepared to stop; 3) the southern driveway doesn’t meet District policy for right-in/right-out only driveways to be offset at least 220’ from a signalized intersection; and 4) the southern driveway doesn’t meet District policy for the driveway to be offset 245’ from the north driveway. Written Testimony: The Applicant submitted a response to the staff report in agreement with Staff’s recommended change to the plat note and the single-access via Spanish Fork; a revised site plan was submitted depicting the access approved by ACHD; no other written testimony was submitted. Staff Recommendation: Approval as follows: “17. Direct lot or parcel access to W. Overland Rd., S. Linder Rd., and S. Spanish Fork Way is prohibited except for Lot 2, Block 2” consistent with ACHD’s action on the matter per the revised site plan. Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2020-0023, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 14, 2020: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2020-0023, as presented during the hearing on April 14, 2020, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2020-0023 to the hearing date of __________ for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) Item #6I: ICCU at TM Creek (H-2020-0016) Application(s):  Development Agreement Modification Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 2.03 acres of land, zoned C-G, located at 3152 W. Peak Cloud Ln. at the SEC of W. Franklin Rd. & S. Ten Mile Rd. History: A DA exists for this site that has been amended a couple of times previously. Summary of Request: The Applicant proposes a modification to the existing DA for TM Creek Subdivision (H-2017-0124) to update the conceptual development plan for the site to allow for the development of a financial institution with a drive-through for Idaho Central Credit Union. The existing concept plan depicts building footprints for three (3) separate structures on Lots 9-11, Block 2, TM Creek Subdivision No. 2. Structures are depicted abutting the adjacent street buffers along Ten Mile and Franklin Roads to the north and west and the drive aisle along the south boundary with parking internal to the site. A single driveway for a drive-through is depicted on the north and west sides of the building at the corner of Franklin & Ten Mile Roads. The Applicant intends to combine the three (3) lots into one (1) parcel through a subsequent PBA application and construct one (1) 5,672 square foot single-story structure with five (5) drive-thru lanes on the north side of the building adjacent to the street buffer along W. Franklin Rd. with an exit driveway along the west side of the building adjacent to the street buffer along S. Ten Mile Rd. and parking to the south and east of the structure building. The DA states that most buildings along S. Ten Mile Road should address the street by being built to the street buffer in accord with the TMISAP. This provision is especially important as this site is situated at the corner of two major access thoroughfares (Franklin & Ten Mile Roads) and is highly visible from these roadways. The proposed building is not planned to be built to the street buffer as desired and the five (5) drive-through lanes will be highly visible from Franklin Rd. directly conflicting with the intent of the aforementioned DA provision. The DA also requires all future development to be consistent with the design elements contained in the TMISAP, the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and the design guidelines in the Meridian Design Manual, which has been replaced by the Architectural Standards Manual. The following are goals and design elements in the Ten Mile Plan that are applicable to the proposed development along with Staff’s comments in regard to consistency with these elements: • Traditional neighborhood design concepts with a strong pedestrian-oriented focus are essential – the proposed drive-through use and design with 5 drive-through lanes is extremely vehicular focused and not pedestrian as desired. • Street-oriented design is critical in urban environments and especially at a gateway to the Ten Mile Area such as this; buildings should be at or close to the property line creating a consistent edge to the public space and making streets more friendly and walkable – the proposed structure is separated by (5) drive-through lanes on the north side of the building adjacent to W. Franklin Rd. and (1) driveway on the west side of the building adjacent to S. Ten Mile Rd. • All new commercial buildings should have a continuous unbroken frontage along required build-to lines to a minimum height of 30 feet for at least 75% of the property frontage – the proposed building height is only 22 feet; most of the existing structures in the overall development so far are built to the frontage. Furthermore, the proposed building and site design lack any gateway features or enhanced integration with the overall site and district, despite the prominent corner visibility. • New buildings at street intersections should hold the corners and avoid additional building setbacks unless a new public space is specified – the proposed building is set a substantial distance away from the intersection and is separated by a major vehicular oriented use \[i.e. (5) drive-through lanes\]; no public spaces are proposed. • At least 40% of the linear dimension of the street level frontage shall be in windows or doorways – while the west elevations is consistent with this design element, the north elevation has no windows or doorways. • The goal in these areas is to achieve a FAR (floor area ratio) of 1.00-1.25 or more – the proposed development has a FAR of 0.06, which is 0.94 under the minimum desired. In order to achieve this goal, and recognizing site limitations with the Ten Mile Creek, buildings must be multi-story or make heavy use of shared parking areas and with less vehicular-oriented design. Multi-story examples of other banks that would be in closer alignment with FAR goals, exist at the NE corner of Fairview and Eagle and on the SE corner of Eagle and Overland. So far, this overall area is not developing consistent with the FAR goal in the Plan. • Building heights should be 2-4 stories over much of the area with opportunities for taller buildings in a few locations – the proposed building is only a single-story in height. So far, the TM Creek commercial use area has only developed with single-story buildings; the future commercial buildings to the east in the TN-C district are required by the DA to be a minimum of 2-stories in height. Four-story apartment buildings have been constructed to the east within the TM Creek area. Single story structures surrounded by surface parking and drive aisles make it difficult for the plan to ever meet the unique destination elements of the Plan that would draw and support broader demographic diversity important to many employers. The following are design elements in UDC 11-3A-19 that are applicable to the proposed development: • Site design: For lots with frontage on a public street, a minimum of 40% of the buildable frontage of the property shall be occupied by building facades and/or public space; within mixed use areas, buildings may be placed away from roadways if a minimum of 30% of the buildable frontage is occupied by building facades and/or public space. The building is proposed to be located away from the adjacent roadways; there are no buildings or public space along the frontage of this property, however there are buildings along the buildable frontage on the larger mixed use designated area. • Pedestrian walkways: A continuous internal pedestrian walkway that is a minimum of 5 feet in width is required to be provided from the perimeter sidewalk to the main building entrance(s) for nonresidential uses; where the walkway crosses vehicular driving surfaces, it is required to be distinguished from the vehicular surface through the use of pavers, colored or scored concrete or bricks. There is a pedestrian walkway depicted on the site plan from the sidewalk along Ten Mile Rd. to the main building entrance but there is not a pedestrian walkway from the north from the sidewalk along Franklin Rd. - one is required. During the pre-application meeting, Staff discussed with the Applicant the need for the structure to be built to the street buffer along Ten Mile and Franklin Roads and discussed other site design options. These options consisted of locating the drive-through on the south side of the building or detaching the drive-through from the building and locating it south of the building similar to that of CapEd Credit Union located at the intersection of S. Meridian Rd. and E. Overland Rd. The proposed plan is deficient in many of the goals and design elements of the Ten Mile Plan as noted above. Due to its location at a major intersection and gateway to the Ten Mile Area, development of this site consistent with the TMISAP is key. If the proposed concept plan is approved by City Council, Staff recommends as a provision of the amended DA that screening is provided in the street buffers along S. Ten Mile Rd. and W. Franklin Rd. adjacent to the (5) drive-through lanes in the form of berms, landscaping, walls, architectural elements, or a combination of these elements to produce an appropriate buffer adjacent to public spaces and roadways. Concept elevations for the financial institution were submitted; the design of the structure is required to comply with the design elements in the TMISAP as set forth in the DA and with the standards in the Architectural Standards Manual. This review will take place with submittal of a Design Review application with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. A conceptual perspective drawing was submitted for the north side of the building demonstrating how the drive-through area could be screened with vegetated screen walls. Staff is supportive of this concept IF the proposed concept plan is approved by Council but would like to see more landscaping (trees & shrubs) & berming within the street buffers adjacent to the drive-thru along with the screen walls. Staff Recommendation: If Council approves the Applicant’s request for an amendment to the concept plan, Staff recommends berming and additional landscaping (trees & shrubs) with vegetated screen walls are provided in the street buffers adjacent to the drive-through along the north & west boundaries of the site as mentioned previously. Written Testimony: Aurora Riopelle, Applicant’s Representative Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2020-0016, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 14, 2020: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2020-0016, as presented during the hearing on April 14, 2020, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2020-0016 to the hearing date of __________ for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) Item #6J: Bannock Ridge (H-2019-0143) Application(s):  Development Agreement Modification  Preliminary Plat Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 4.35 acres of land, zoned R-4, located at 2940 S. Mesa Way. History: This property was previously platted as Lot 3, Block 2, Kachina Estates Subdivision. It was annexed in 2017 as part of a larger 13.58 acre project, also called Bannock Ridge, and is governed by a DA approved with that project. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: LDR (3 or fewer units/acre) Summary of Request: Development Agreement modification to remove the subject 4.35 acre property from the 13.58 acre boundary of the existing agreement for the purpose of entering into a new agreement consistent with the proposed development plan. A new Preliminary Plat is proposed consisting of 10 buildable lots & 5 common lots on 4.35 acres of land in the R-4 zoning district for the construction of SFR detached homes. There is an existing home & accessory structures that are proposed to remain on a lot in the proposed subdivision; the southern-most accessory structure on Lot 10, Block 1 does not comply with the minimum 15’ rear setback, the plat will need to be revised to comply or the structure will need to be removed. Access is proposed via S. Mesa Way at the east boundary and via the extension of an existing stub street, E. Loggers Pass St. at the west boundary of the site which is proposed to stub to the south boundary of the subdivision for future extension. A 10’ wide segment of the City’s multi-use pathway system is proposed along the frontage of this site adjacent to S. Mesa Way, extending along the southern boundary to the NWC of the site for connection to the existing pathway in Glacier Springs Subdivision to the west along the Ten Mile Creek in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. There is a short segment (10’+/-) of the pathway in Glacier Springs Sub at the NWC of the site that didn’t get constructed with that development leaving a gap in the pathway system; the current DA contains a provision for the missing section to be completed with this development if approval can be obtained from the Glacier Springs HOA – staff recommends this provision is carried over to the new DA. Because the area of the proposed plat is below 5 acres in size, the qualified open space & site amenity standards listed in the UDC do not apply. However, common area is proposed where a segment of the City’s regional pathway system is planned through the subdivision and where the Ten Mile Creek is located totaling 11% of common open space. Concept building elevations were submitted for future homes proposed within this development. Homes depicted are a single- story & a single-story with a bonus room over the garage with a variety and mix of finish materials consisting of horizontal and vertical siding, and stucco with stone/brick veneer accents; 2-story homes aren’t shown but may also be constructed. Commission Recommendation: Approval Summary of Commission Public Hearing: a. In favor: Dan Lardie, Leavitt & Associates, Applicant’s Representative; Ryan Recla b. In opposition: None c. Commenting: Aneke Binford, Matt Binford, Celeste Blackburn, Jamie Clausen d. Written testimony: Dan Lardie, Leavitt & Associates, Applicant’s Representative (in agreement with staff report) e. Staff presenting application: Bill Parsons Key Issue(s) of Public Testimony: a. Concern from the homeowner’s to the south (Binford’s) pertaining to lack of substantial buffering between the public walking path and the full length of their property; and the impact on their ability effectively irrigate their land. They request a good neighbor fence & a more substantial vegetative buffer along the pathway to clearly distinguish the public from private property to discourage trespassing & protect their privacy; and a berm along their property to allow them to continue to effectively (flood) irrigate their property; b. Preference for the multi-use pathway to follow the creek consistent with the pathway in adjacent developments rather than jog through the proposed neighborhood; c. Concern that the proposed development isn’t consistent with the existing CC&R’s for the subdivision (i.e. Kachina Estates); d. Complaint pertaining to the neighborhood meeting \[i.e. the time of day it was held when nobody could attend and that it was held in a place where there wasn’t much room (in a pub/restaurant) – they didn’t provide a space for them to meet as they thought no one would show up\]; e. Concern that the proposed homes in the development won’t be compatible with existing homes in the area. Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: a. The new preliminary plat won’t trigger minimum qualified open space & site amenity standards since the site is below 5 acres in size, whereas the existing plat does – would prefer more open space is provided; b. Preference for the three (3) original parcels to develop together as currently platted rather than splitting this one (and possibly others) off into individual developments; c. Preference for a berm, fence and landscaping to be constructed by the Developer along the southern boundary adjacent to the Binford property; d. Preference for Lot 2, Block 2 to be a common area lot rather than a buildable lot for a future retention pond/space. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: a. Add a DA provision requiring the Developer to construct a berm no less than 18-inches tall along the southern boundary of the development with fencing on both sides of the pathway and landscaping between the pathway and fence – the Applicant should work with the adjacent property owners (Binford’s) on an agreeable berm height/placement and enhanced landscaping prior to the Council meeting for presentation at the Council hearing (see Section IX, A.1h); and, b. Add a condition requiring Lot 2, Block 2 to be converted from a buildable to a common lot (see conditions #2h and #3f). Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: Resolution of the landscaping and fencing along the southern boundary of the site adjacent to the Binford property. A revised landscape plan was submitted that depicts twice as many trees as originally proposed along the southern boundary of the pathway – The Applicant should address if perimeter fencing is proposed and if so, what type; and whether a berm is proposed or not and if so, how tall and whether or not it’s necessary for it to encroach on the Binford’s property. Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: None Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2019-0143, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 14, 2020: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2019-0143, as presented during the hearing on April 14, 2020, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2019-0143 to the hearing date of ____________ for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) b. Applicant shall provide a minimum of 6 to 8 amenities, including a clubhouse, walking trails and fitness facility with the remainder coordinated with staff. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: None Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: Barbara Valdez Verbal (recorded) Testimony since Commission Hearing: Alan Fox (in favor of proposed development as he doesn’t believe it will impact the school system or raise property taxes); Pat Rennison (in support of proposed development – would be happy to have them as neighbors). Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2019-0127, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 14, 2020: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2019-0127, as presented during the hearing on April 14, 2020, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2019-0127 to the hearing date of _________ for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) Item #6K: Andorra Senior Living (H-2019-0127) Application(s):  Annexation & Zoning  Vacation of ROW Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 16.99 acres of land, zoned RUT & R1 in Ada County, located at 715 & 955 S. Wells St. & 971 E. Wells Circle at the SWC of E. Magic View Dr. & S. Wells St. History: In 1983 the property was platted in the County as Amended Magic View Subdivision Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: MU-N (8ac) and MDR (9ac) Summary of Request: Annexation and zoning of 16.99 acres of land with the TN-R zoning district. A conceptual development plan depicts a senior living community consisting of 76 single family style dwelling units and a 3-story apartment building with 88 dwelling units AND vacate existing un-named ACHD ROW between the 715 and 955 S. Wells St. properties and a portion of E. Wells Circle so the roadway can be extended to the west boundary for future extension. ACHD supports the vacation of the ROW as proposed by the applicant and the concept plan has been updated to reflect their requirements. This property is designated MU-N (Mixed Use – Neighborhood) (approximately 8 acres) and MDR (approximately 9 acres) on the Future Land Use Map. The Applicant proposes to develop the site with an age restricted (55+) multi-family residential development consistent with the goals and policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant is requesting to construct a building footprint of 36,000 square feet; 20,000 square feet is desired in the MU-N designation unless public uses, larger building includes commercial uses and abundant open space are provided. Staff finds the applicant has provided ample open space with a public use and the building will include commercial uses as defined by the MU-N guidelines. Access to this development is proposed from the adjacent local streets (S. Wells St. and E. Wells Circle) in accord with UDC 11-3A-3. For internal connectivity, the applicant is proposing gated private streets with some of the units taking access from common driveways. The proposed development is expected to develop in 2 phases – The first phase is the area north of the Five Creek and includes the development of 57 units and the clubhouse. The second phase is the area south the Creek. This phase includes the 3-story Apt building, 18 individual units, restaurant and the extension of E. Wells Circle. Per the Planning and Zoning Commission, the SWC of the concept plan was re-designed to accommodate the existing 20-foot PW easement and 2 of the residential units re-oriented to prevent direct access to E. Wells Circle. The applicant is proposing 26.6% of the site as common open space including the following amenities: clubhouse, fitness facility, restaurant, spa, salon, walking trails, pool, open grassy areas, community gardens and various sport courts. Although, some of these amenities are conceptual at this time, staff finds the proposed amenity package for the development is commensurate to the size of the proposed development. Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed structures on the site. All structures are required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. Submittal and approval of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review applications are required prior to submittal of building permit application(s). Commission Recommendation: Approval at the March 5, 2020 hearing Summary of Commission Public Hearing: a. In favor: Clay Sammis and Jeremy Garner b. In opposition: None c. Commenting: Monica McKinley, Pat Rennison and Barbara Valdez d. Written testimony: Woodbridge HOA, Alan and Carol Jax, Barbara Valdez, Bob and Lindy Neufeld, Dennis Bailey, Pat Rennision and Cassy Peck Key Issues of Public Testimony: a. Extension of E. Wells Circle. b. Public hearing notification to home owners in the Locust View Heights Subdivision c. Impacts to Locust View Heights Subdivision. Key Issues of Discussion by Commission: a. Amount of open space and amenities proposed for the development. b. Square footage of the balconies proposed for the 3-story apartment complex. c. No units having direct access to E. Wells Circle. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: a. No units shall take direct access from E. Wells Circle (Concept plan has been updated to reflect this change). City Council 914eetin 9 Aprif 14, 2020 r Item #6H : Blue Valley Elementary School — Plat Note Modification log-end Pam - L-ccfl=or 1 x � 1 # ■ approved - 1 I T so aL r . 1 r -a % ` Not BPpmved AREA 48 ~ } - r -'0 61 { ti Proposed Change: : ""17. Direct lot or parcel access to W. Overland Rd., S. Linder Rd., and S. Spanish Fork Way is prohibited except for Lot 2, Block 2." Revised Site Plan per the Staff Recommendation 4 1 Ir 1 � � 5 R 5 in Overall Site Plan Legend 0 Item #6I : Idaho Central Credit Union ICCU at TM Creek �cf ice- L:--=3 a=or �_151 ITT �_� Proposed Layout FC m Nr �_ ��T Existing Layout -1 I,r • �._ :r_ . �. Yam ' "` I 1 P �1 r I "A&"Y I I I c C-fir ILrlliTil.S , '0` �T'''r IL AMID - ! i7 T r ni! ffE T i ti arc"ii W [{17I11�71Tr1TTT1 r �•• . iG'I �; � �� I r, k }. I $ 4 r f Concept _ �i_!_�_i■��iif r ilf �ini� 4, _ f EAST ELEVATION �' � fli � 'liiii i■_ _■ - - _ �_ ..��:_z s-' � mow._ ■ L 57 i�� ir■!it■i■ ■iiiil��i� rin�■�. ■!llil7�!!■ � ELEVATIONWEST Aft �4k MRI C R' - a w z .i b IOU -to ka -il +ram i�`kL'�.Y�� r,. T a ON ■■ 111 s■■■■ 111 Monson ■Emmons r. WE t „ ■■■ B ■ f ■11 ■o■ WE Oron son in in II 1111 - N■■■■ ■ II 1111 NINE■ H�_�zti.ti• } Emmons IN III I1111■ I I1111■ 1■ 16 IN ILI 7■ on7■ k • •f•_. 11 III11111 �■ NONE■■ r ■ Z_== ■■N■■■ r . INapt s =�•' ■■I NINE ■f■■■■■■■N■ ■■ �i ■■ ■■�i■■ ■I■ ■ IIIINI ■ r t F - MODEMIIIINI ■■I . ■I■ ,■ ■■ _" 0 MEN ■ ■ - ■ ■1� ■ I E1!r "W IN ■� ■ EON � r `� r � ■ �i �� 11111 II � �■ ■i a 1111j II 'M�' NONE- sk ■■■N■ _ I I Irl _ -- — -- - onion i ■ _ �� _SI I Irl _� r F �"- = I Irl I =� ,1,,,11,�� - �� ■ 111 = 11 =� 111111111��■��-� �- ;F %- ■EI■uEl■ ■nlll = = - • : = IIIII =� ■II■IIII■ ■■'lll ■ - ■ 1 111 III,Ind, :11111 -111 1 111 11 :11111 - IIIIIIIIE �III■ail■ I1111111 _ -I1111111■_� ' IE IIIIIIII _ .I �EEiE1■1E 1111 IIIIIIRi 1111 �S 111111111 --� 1111 11,1 1, �S 111111111 -=� _ ' ;11,111,11,1, : 1111111�•_i 111111 111111 111111■IONE 1111111E 111111 list III gp,1■1...■1i • 111•.■1 E11111 111■■ �E ��11■...Eli_ _ 111..■I II IIIIIIII■' . Existing Approved Development Plan A BANNOCK RIDGE SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT r + . v i7rl ff r. h irk up W-T. f'r A 1 •°n t1] a Now 70 dmd '15 3G � G� + A3 C fh Aii Ry x I 4 A 4 f g gg' SJ 8 k a R..',• TAR r a -- 3 Proposed Preliminary Plat & Landscape Plan BANNOCK RIDGE SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT T.3N,RJE,SEC.19,?LDA COUNTY,MER)DIAN,IDAHO 2019 PE - arxc a nwn I. eenrlx PARCARCELL NO.0. R4814130225 '\�. '�' f � 5.. Y -. - �11M1 � IaVI�E � Y•Wf. � J ` \\l i �� N •1� �o rem uwr � � Gn - ..BLOCI 1 f ~� �w•r wr.�anm v � 110R S � "' � 'l• L 41::IURT-A[�--ncvv, OTTK � ♦� ' Of10ulll e E, l - & T [ A 3 �.\\ —_ \ $yam►_\ .19 10 � �o-.r •_i'"" �:� E,,,F„ar _- 1 �k�l � l• $�ab'�r- -- °'s :r �Ile y - �' r �� s.uEsa lwv Trricu io'weE uu�n°use PATMW sccnorr `•.� ''-_� . . ti ert. �o F L IIe1.F SEAEET SECFGY NTCHIN COYYClJ EON -R.s- -n,,s- 1-�i •�j �R J ti - r 'i T} fff c' t t e ,I I''•- � 1 r ie I 41 ! - 1TPMJL 10'Y1f1E YIeL11 IlSE PAMWRY S:CTh'RJ PRTtl.NE I l TlP1fS�t yTR F£E$[�' �� ✓VLANG TEN MILE CREEK YVPIEJL FyIF STREET SEC[C]Y I l [�}-Nig I I• I - I fr +1 rt�� 1 I �- � I I " Proposed Conceptual Elevations p p Zzo S dR FRONT E�VATION UB REAR ELEVATION mm a FRONT ELVA7ON ens �^P REAR ELEVATION =r FRONT ELEVATON FRONT ELEVATION ecw.�va•.ne• scau..v.•a•.a• 0 rya.vd eK eax FRONT EL✓VATION Ulu a m , REAR ELEVATION (�AIP V4Y,p' Proposed Landscape Buffer to South t k i _ k ` � I is-, �� ,• I � I � � 7 Hai ' k 4e d I • i � - r d9Si Sr~ � ari Ok M !E ND f Y�iYirQl� r � r M22 Sr r f *Ad Existing fence proposed to remain i k i I A lL F. F H K L•I M `, I _ ■ I---- OWN ■11■ ■11 �: ; •� , ,}.. jMEN I I on �■■■■ ■■■■ 111111 � 111 ' { — _ " ■ ■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■ . ._ ' . �. - -, - ' a ■ ■■■�■■� 1■ 111111 s �r ■■■■ ■■l 1■ .V1111111 .1.■ oil ■1MEN 111111-1 111111�.1.■ sling■��■� . rs �� - -__ ti. ..'r 3 f 11 I11 IIN I.II.i �' � .�'1• _'.� � mill dill -- s mill t i -�� I11 ��. ti -' # ��.1111111� �11111 �� 1r: �1111111� m11111 * �' 1■1■ ■�� s J 1111 ■■■ r. J - •ice■ � C� i�� -� � 84 ' + Tw 84 64 a3b rat t •�. ?yam•~ � r �� _� h r L�..'•15.. } {' Conceptual Site Plan � ` phase I 715 LS STRr . . f " .- F -STR; Phase .LE ` :;~ Conceptual Elevations �+,s�■� 00 11 go 0 1 0 00 go go a 00 11 Ii A Uzi .1 I r. � � � 1 � 11=- 1 1 1 1 �� ■ 1 1 11 J 1 11 11 1 IL � � l lPii�I — _ h — — — . I11 ■ __� _ .� -- - - 1 I 11 1111 1113 11li' ,— ��Is I■I 11 _ 110. LILLIll Li 11� 1111 = 1 11 _ 11 _�_ av i�l • I - �' �li„ I ■I �■ i� �� I �� _ %_III �, I� i, fe_.._ I r � �11111�� s II I I II li�l n e i�ly�up; u n i ` 4r p-r .ICI■ gold E IDIAN --- IDAHO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Agenda Item Number: 6 H Item Title: Meeting Notes: (�E IDI y ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item - 6.1-1. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item - Public Hearing for Blue Valley Elementary School (H-2020-0023) by Becky Yzaguirre, The Land Group, Located at 1830 W.American Fork Dr. Click Here for Application Materials Click Here to Sign Up to Testify at Hearing- If you plan to provide a visual presentation, it must be sent via email to cityclerk@meridiancity.org before Noon on the day of the meeting. You must check the box on the sign up that you wish to join via Zoom. You will then be sent an email with the link to the meeting. Council Notes: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Upload Date Updated Staff Report Staff Report 4/8/2020 REVIEWERS: Department Reviewer Action Date Clerk. Johnson, Chris Approved 4/7/2020 -6:51 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 121 of 242 4/14/2020 City of Meridian-Public Hearing Sign In Form Tools Details and Signatures For Public Hearing Hearing Date: 4/14/2020 Hearing Type: Council Item Number: 6-H Project Name: Blue Valley Elementary School VAC Project No.: H-2020-0023 Active: Signature HOA I Wish To Sign In Sign-In Email HOA Name For Neutral Against Name Represent Participate Date/Time Doug Representing 4/7/2020 Russell doug@thelandgroupinc.com the owner of X X X 4:08:37 the property PM Sean 4/7/2020 Conner conn4509@outlook.com X 6:23:19 PM Go Back To List Export To Excel @ 2020 - City of Meridian, Idaho internalapps/SIGNINFORMTOOLS/SignlnFormDetails?id=435 1/1 STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING 4/14/2020 Legend 0 DATE: Continuedfrom: 41712020 p,a LM tLflcflliar TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton,Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2020-0023 Blue Valley Elementary School -VAC LOCATION: 1830 W.American Fork Dr. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Request to modify note#17 on the Southridge Subdivision No. 1 plat that prohibits direct lot or parcel access to S. Spanish Fork Way to allow an exception for Lot 2,Block 2. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Applicant: Becky Yzaguirre,The Land Group—462 E. Shore Dr., Ste. 100,Eagle, ID 83616 B. Owner: West Ada School District(WASD)— 1303 E. Central Dr.,Meridian, ID 83642 C. Representative: Becky Yzaguirre,The Land Group—462 E. Shore Dr., Ste. 100,Eagle, ID 83616 III. STAFF ANALYSIS The Applicant proposes to amend plat note#17 on the recorded plat for Southridge Subdivision No. 1, which prohibits direct lot or parcel access to S. Spanish Fork Way, to allow an exception for Lot 2, Block 2 to have two(2) accesses (see Section V.A). The Applicant states that in order to develop this site with an elementary school, West Ada School District (WASD) needs two (2) direct accesses off S. Spanish Fork Way, a collector street, to accommodate an ingress-egress for school buses and parent pick-up/drop-off lanes, as shown on the site plan in Section V.B.Modification to the note as proposed will allow the school the needed accesses while still restricting access to the collector street for other lots in the subdivision. The final plat approved by the City Council in 2008,did not include a note prohibiting direct lot access Page 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 122 of 242 to S. Spanish Fork Way, a collector street.Note#16 on that plat stated, "Direct lot access to S. Linder Road and W.Overland Road is prohibited."Prior to ACHD signing the plat,they required the Applicant to modify the note to add a restriction prohibiting direct lot access to S. Spanish Fork Way. Even though the City didn't require the restriction, because it is on the plat, the Ada County Surveyor requested City Council, along with ACHD, approve the proposed modification prior to removal of the note from the plat. Once approved by both agencies,the Ada County Surveyor and Professional Land Surveyor(Jim Washburn)will work together to process an Affidavit of Correction to modify the plat note. The City Attorney determined the appropriate process for City Council to approve the modification is through a vacation application so that there would be notice, a hearing and a record of the City's decision. A Traffic Impact Study was submitted to ACHD for review with the request for modification to the plat note. Although ACHD policy does not allow the proposed accesses, Staff recommended a modification of policy to allow only one driveway onto Spanish Fork Way 400'north of the roundabout and for the plat note to read, "Direct lot or parcel access onto W. Overland Rd., S. Linder Rd., and S. Spanish Fork Way is prohibited except for one driveway for direct lot access onto S. Spanish Fork Way for Lot 2, Block 2." Only the northern access for school buses and staff was approved due to the following reasons: 1)there wasn't sufficient justification in the TIS for two driveways; 2)the southern driveway is proposed to be located on the departing leg of the roundabout and drivers are typically accelerating as they exit and are not prepared to stop; 3) the southern driveway doesn't meet District policy for right-in/right-out only driveways to be offset at least 220' from a signalized intersection;and 4)the southern driveway doesn't meet District policy for the driveway to be offset 245' from the north driveway (see ACHD Staff Report for more information). See the site plan in Section V.B for the approved access driveway. IV. DECISION A. Staff: Based on ACHD's action on this request, Staff recommends Council approval of the modification to note #17 as follows: "Direct lot or parcel access onto W. Overland Rd., S. Linder Rd., and S. Spanish Fork Way is prohibited except for one driveway for direct lot access onto S. Spanish Fork Way for Lot 2,Block 2." Page 2 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 123 of 242 V. EXHIBITS A. Recorded Plat&Proposed Change to Note#17 Final Plat for Southridge Subdivision Phase 1 9 Situated In a pcnlan of the ME 1{4 of ggatlpn 23, Township 3 North,Range 1 West,B.M. City of Merldlan,Ada County,Idaho r'aial xs 2011 Z-7 .rh lalllllA Rllr]9144 CrP Ls.r.�r ausar�s me"s°s a�e2i' sir ..----..•'� . Noter, W.OVERL,ANDAD. 6 a 8110Alndax 1„rc,on.ra.x..rn nmcrt Pin R a Pa BLOCS 1 Stu I-v[nui am wr a%9�s u�r,�w�. ao, .a. .a • s fix.UEM, Y �� _ s]ma-anoas on ru]r rm.yn w.nn ei.�a.�rsuu anon LV I oar s-ROPY ass e Llnpian-ad $ e-nwx s ui�riacs i r1TN•rs�Yls•'Wu9FYmRSrir:Y�'IS�txv,�v+s•'•,�5 I rin - t3]C 94Er 1) aaer I� 81FEr]-LA'IFK41E 9F 6,ap. a�mua•`umaarnra�n R loom[a,cr ie¢uu u n[o-r v Lecax n x n[ ` u 95[[T a-f�11,1E 9EEr 1.uoeGe Ml']on a Wpw mandf d�efmti m e�Lw-uea rt a]arrxe ndla a•n�m. � 9� f�wawl.K „eanu� wnm ra wrx ma asa,a oa,ci x mu.a m aw� BLOCK 2 >• 4°Y� a aFl11Y MII�RYrl0.`�6 Yl d tl�bl®�KlY3YE1A AOr x.W r�{n.FN1fY WARS. aeee a.raa�r ue w,amei]ens��i.p4kp+i p+�raea�ae seaa+aa4 1 2 "qm!a lc i>•ra larr lYa Pval PL M�+n�T.Iti F Si idraryR.s✓�iW+traq Z! QMs]Lern ��.�L�a 7r mra]sl nc�u-�mn xan a�nori aivx ur..a Pu>v'n� i � ; 6vPlo4 i.9mLllel rnn'✓t!u'.Mml riRnY sLUL c u amv a p glLIG fir nr d•P twcrvr!r o!yqr K nlpJnS nwYRx Mc eFIMI'] P wf lBl��a ANL.,dY�,w�I�I rtI VE+M�ro,�Ml.�E�grlya Ni QL4C+K$ w�W,rtlr��n�irio.a�WRo,rt'4�tdrMBl.,bau��.d�..ntx OaPnss'�[�MMi FI�� 1' n : �i � 12A59 g is% rdn owa,n sw rP.srMmrn+e++:.+n n+au.w.e.ous.aow c,l •e a BLOCKS L �id[w'uINNYt.x�ir r.ol.�.a•A-x u.o[a av xYwm rn rrrs rlowrlo ��` �y� La is 4re6 V wi Fmiag Jrs i N�iPa� P1r i.pp.�r M .ier R K a L C]d! i m pwirC l arraa�.s�`i t~a,m�rr hT%K[lVr.f*CY rEaiOY C Yr WI.Tn.'9 � T%2 .n+a t rc wm c�ec,mz u..m kl S,i me `w'�aa� n a ive n�veuv w a"ie r"}"uei uw o'�e«�c�'sm,�' Unplat#edI Legend - > . raw uu nN ar I M uw OROW raw�nuuw x ien:ac oar.',-n mo sonwt raLvan s oe.r ru+ssarrr w��vna mw ale'sm rr.as nwm r17 o-n,,,'r„'..••".' p Tr kw S1FIl PM 1 YJRCm-u IYS9!' PAIN 5/631�1 P� �¢ p ltr,r'r Srm CM rrt aWan,'µa 111w 11Rc'arilEr SZtYJ .��. Q '2r,-if+'clV6 rai]c axbID'elE ili6!' U�r.nn 9xSd5.6 � cunu+Ln Pwlt lu,ar raw m ar rPc „n]awxrn nws,rc.crP tirenamw e3R3esr uc ui eisLcn i],aam Lk,a Developarlowner me rxiexaPais aP _14 _ —wrt,u Lot at i N+ Linder 1N,LLC BLOCK eLadLxwLxn —_ _ —�1°'roc raumuwiL U0m 955-Eess ROW—va Paean,aene ays,e __wool wr PH cacao �w i�rst 1 r. US F-C I' M OR PARIM ACCE :, S LIN•DER RC. ANO S. Proposed Change: 17. Direct lot or parcel access to W. Overland Rd., S. Linder Rd., and S. Spanish Fork Way is prohibited except for Lot 2,Block 2." Page 3 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 124 of 242 B. Proposed Site Plan(dated: l/15/20) a I •., �� ME I I � a AREA 3' � ti II 41 - ® ® 1 Not - a approved ■ ARE,4B AREA 2 , AREA 4A V C1-00 Overall Site Plan �'w Page 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 125 of 242 E IDIAN --- IDAHO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Agenda Item Number: 6 I Item Title: Meeting Notes: (�E IDI y ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item - 6.1. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item - Public Hearing for Idaho Central Credit Union (H-2020-0016) by Idaho Central Credit Union, Located at 3152 W. Peak Cloud Ln. Click Here for Application Materials Click Here to Sign Up to Testify at Hearing- If you plan to provide a visual presentation, it must be sent via email to cityclerk@meridiancity.org before Noon on the day of the meeting. You must check the box on the sign up that you wish to join via Zoom. You will then be sent an email with the link to the meeting. Council Notes: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Upload Date Revised Staff Report Staff Report 4/10/2020 REVIEWERS: Department Reviewer Action Date Clerk. Johnson, Chris Approved 4/7/2020 -6:51 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 126 of 242 4/14/2020 City of Meridian-Public Hearing Sign In Form Tools Details and Signatures For Public Hearing Hearing Date: 4/14/2020 Hearing Type: Council Item Number: 6-1 Project Name: Idaho Central Credit Union MDA Project No.: H-2020-0016 Active: Signature HOA HOA I Wish To Sign In Sign-In Email For Neutral Against Name Name Represent Participate Date/Time 4/7/2020 Aurora Riopelle aurorar@lcarch.com X 4:21:31 PM Dustee 4/14/2020 Woolstenhulme dwoolstenhulme@iccu.com X X 6:34:15 PM Go Back To List Export To Excel ©2020 - City of Meridian, Idaho internalapps/SIGNINFORMTOOLS/SignlnFormDetails?id=455 1/1 STAFF REPORT C�I w IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING 4/14/2020 Legend I 9PTO DATE: Continued from: 41712020 fff�- t D=�rti C no I TO: Mayor&City Council 7 L .15 C-N RUT 1-L FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 IF C=C R- - SUBJECT: H-2020-0016 kR_S R.40 RUT - - ICCU at TM Creek-MDA RUT LOCATION: 3152 W. Peak Cloud Ln. 40 -C C-C R-8 R1 �ZE I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Modification to the existing Development Agreement for TM Creek Subdivision(H-2017-0124, Inst. #2017-113747)to update the conceptual development plan for the site to allow for the development of a financial institution with a drive-through. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Applicant: Dustee Woolstenhulme,Idaho Central Credit Union—4400 Central Way, Chubbuck, ID 83206 B. Owner: Brighton Land Holdings,LLC—2929 W.Navigator Dr., Ste. 400,Meridian,ID 83642 C. Representative: Aurora Riopelle, Lombard Conrad Architects— 1221 Shoreline Ln.,Boise,ID 83702 III. STAFF ANALYSIS The Applicant proposes to amend the conceptual development plan included in the existing Development Agreement (H-2017-0124, Inst. #2017-113747). This property is zoned C-G and is designated MU-C(Mixed Use—Commercial)on the Future Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan and is within the area governed by the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan. The existing concept plan depicts building footprints for three (3) separate structures on Lots 9-11, Block 2, TM Creek Subdivision No. 2. Structures are depicted adjacent to the street buffers along Ten Mile and Franklin Roads to the north and west, and to the drive aisle along the south boundary with parking internal to the site. A single driveway for a drive-through is depicted on the north and west Page 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 127 of 242 sides of the building at the corner of Franklin and Ten Mile Roads. The Applicant intends to combine the three (3) lots into one (1)parcel through a subsequent property boundary adjustment application and construct one(1)building on the site for a drive-through financial institution for Idaho Central Credit Union(ICCU). The proposed concept plan depicts a 5,672 square foot single-story 22-foot tall structure with five (5) drive-thru lanes on the north side of the building adjacent to the street buffer along W. Franklin Rd. with an exit driveway along the west side of the building adjacent to the street buffer along S. Ten Mile Rd. and parking to the south and east of the structure. The Development Agreement(DA) (H-2015-0018,Inst. #2016-037777) states, `Most buildings along S. Ten Mile Road should address the street by being built to the street buffer with windows overlooking the pathway to provide security to the pedestrians and bikes on the pathway in accord with the TMISAP."This provision is especially important as this site is situated at the corner of two major access thoroughfares (Franklin& Ten Mile Roads) and is highly visible from these roadways. The proposed building is not planned to be built to the street buffer as desired and the five (5) drive-through lanes will be highly visible from Franklin Rd. directly conflicting with the intent of the aforementioned DA provision. The DA also requires all future development to be consistent with the design elements contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan(TMISAP),the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and the design guidelines in the Meridian Design Manual, which has been replaced by the Architectural Standards Manual. The following are goals and design elements in the TMISAP that are applicable to the proposed development—Staff s analysis is in italics: TMISAP: • Traditional neighborhood design concepts with a strong pedestrian-oriented focus are essential—the proposed drive-through use and design with 5 drive-through lanes is extremely vehicular focused and not pedestrian as desired. • Street-oriented design is critical in urban environments and especially at a gateway to the Ten Mile Area such as this;buildings should be at or close to the property line creating a consistent edge to the public space and making streets more friendly and walkable—the proposed structure is separated by (5) drive-through lanes on the north side of the building adjacent to W. Franklin Rd. and(1) driveway on the west side of the building adjacent to S. Ten Mile Rd. • All new commercial buildings should have a continuous unbroken frontage along required build-to lines to a minimum height of 30 feet for at least 75%of the property frontage—the proposed building height is only 22 feet; most of the existing structures in the overall development so far are built to the frontage. Furthermore, the proposed building and site design lack any gateway features or enhanced integration with the overall site and district, despite the prominent corner visibility. • New buildings at street intersections should hold the corners and avoid additional building setbacks unless a new public space is specified—the proposed building is set a substantial distance away from the intersection and is separated by a major vehicular oriented use[i.e. (5) drive-through lanes]; no public spaces are proposed. • At least 40%of the linear dimension of the street level frontage shall be in windows or doorways—while the west elevations is consistent with this design element, the north elevation has no windows or doorways. • The goal in these areas is to achieve a FAR(floor area ratio)of 1.00-1.25 or more—the proposed development has a FAR of 0.06, which is 0.94 under the minimum desired. In order to achieve this goal, and recognizing site limitations with the Ten Mile Creek, buildings must be multi-story or make heavy use of shared parking areas and with less vehicular-oriented Page 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 128 of 242 design. Multi-story examples of other banks that would be in closer alignment with FAR goals, exist at the NE corner of Fairview and Eagle and on the SE corner of Eagle and Overland. So far, this overall area is not developing consistent with the FAR goal in the Plan. • Building heights should be 2-4 stories over much of the area with opportunities for taller buildings in a few locations—the proposed building is only a single-story in height. So far, the TM Creek commercial use area has only developed with single-story buildings; the future commercial buildings to the east in the TN-C district are required by the DA to be a minimum of 2-stories in height. Four-story apartment buildings have been constructed to the east within the TM Creek area. Single story structures surrounded by surface parking and drive aisles make it difficult for the plan to ever meet the unique destination elements of the Plan that would draw and support broader demographic diversity important to many employers. UDC 11-3A-19: • Site design: For lots with frontage on a public street, a minimum of 40% of the buildable frontage of the property shall be occupied by building facades and/or public space; within mixed use areas, buildings may be placed away from roadways if a minimum of 30% of the buildable frontage is occupied by building facades and/or public space. The building is proposed to be located away from the adjacent roadways; there are no buildings or public space along the frontage of this property, however there are buildings along the buildable frontage on the larger mixed use designated area. • Pedestrian walkways: A continuous internal pedestrian walkway that is a minimum of 5 feet in width is required to be provided from the perimeter sidewalk to the main building entrance(s) for nonresidential uses;where the walkway crosses vehicular driving surfaces,it is required to be distinguished from the vehicular surface through the use of pavers, colored or scored concrete or bricks. There is a pedestrian walkway depicted on the site plan from the sidewalk along Ten Mile Rd. to the main building entrance but there is not a pedestrian walkway from the north from the sidewalk along Franklin Rd. During the pre-application meeting, Staff discussed with the Applicant the need for the structure to be built to the street buffer along Ten Mile and Franklin Roads and discussed other site design options. These options consisted of locating the drive-through on the south side of the building or detaching the drive-through from the building and locating it south of the building similar to that of CapEd Credit Union located at the intersection of S. Meridian Rd. and E. Overland Rd. shown below. K 'S } 4 1 Page 3 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 129 of 242 The proposed plan is deficient in many of the goals and design elements of the Ten Mile Plan as noted above. Due to its location at a major intersection and gateway to the Ten Mile Area, development of this site consistent with the TMISAP is key. If the proposed concept plan is approved by City Council, Staff recommends as a provision of the amended DA that screening is provided in the street buffers along S. Ten Mile Rd. and W. Franklin Rd. adjacent to the (5) drive-through lanes in the form of berms, landscaping, walls, architectural elements, or a combination of these elements to produce an appropriate buffer adjacent to public spaces and roadways. Note: Because this application only proposes to amend the concept plan, Staff did not review the building elevations for consistency with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual. This review will takeplace with submittal of a Design Review application with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. Therefore, the elevations submitted with this application are not approved. IV. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends City Council consider if the proposed concept plan is appropriate for this site and specifically in the Ten Mile Interchange area; if deemed appropriate, Staff recommends the following added provision in the DA: "Screening shall be provided in the street buffers along S. Ten Mile Rd. and W. Franklin Rd. adjacent to the (5) drive-through lanes associated with the ICCU building at the Franklin/Ten Mile intersection in the form of berms, landscaping, walls, architectural elements, or a combination of these elements to produce an appropriate buffer adjacent to public spaces and roadways." Page 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 130 of 242 V. EXHIBITS A. Existing Conceptual Development Plan I _ a coo F � peo fil f: '� '1;:'1':L�e,�5 I� _ �:� � •is P w - f q:•. 1 IE !1 !# F ifi.i - IIl11191f `x;:; — r ' k I 'Y k III Page 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 131 of 242 B. Proposed Conceptual Development Plan,Landscape Plan&Building Elevations CUP 919� L A TINKLE FSVw Tobw MAHO CENTRAL L'j i L r r—*hg.Nt.. Frolm 0.14000 f D.��, is d ® PRO.&"UATA 4 SIT!rLAN 77� W.PFAK CLOUD LKPWA C1.0 Page 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 132 of 242 71.Fxaer,W RNB mosoyY iwromwm L6!S� 'EyW, If � �'�, , •: :. •• }; CALLOLrr LEGEND I � ILVIIm CENfAAL CXEIU UNCH r: + LANDSGAP1< PRBL- r � - �, ,' ��nr �•wry T - I �l' 'Mid s® , aa�lrr ^� v PE*CLOA VLFFVATE� _ Y 9�IEbULE ��- 1lM1M IPYII l rMvsT IT z L1.1 Page 7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 133 of 242 H F O r�ra n. I n+h0. I EAST ELEVATION �� U 19 is ae:.aane .�b� way paa NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION �I tx� LerJ 17.J D �] F H I MirI I WEST ELEVATION L O_1M B_LRD IDAHO CENTRAL CREDIT UNION C b- _�D TEN MILE BRANCH 6m6mUmnr A R C N 1 7 E C T S PR4J&r;T U]923n.nS I Of.TDSER 21.2019 eaYe ar-r Note: The concept elevations were submitted as supplementary information with the proposed conceptual development plan for the MDA application and were not reviewed with this application for consistency with the design elements in the TMISAP and with the standards in the Architectural Standards Manual; therefore, they are not approved. Review and approval of the elevations will take place with submittal of a future Design Review application if the MDA is approved. Page 8 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 134 of 242 A, S L -t E IDIAN --- IDAHO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Agenda Item Number: 6 J Item Title: Meeting Notes: (�E IDI y ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item - 6.J. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: Title of Item - Public Hearing for Bannock Ridge (H-2019-0143) by Ryan Recla, Located at 2940 S. Mesa Way Click Here for Application Materials Click Here to Sign Up to Testify at Hearing - If you plan to provide a visual presentation, it must be sent via email to cityclerk@meridiancity.org before Noon on the day of the meeting. You must check the box on the sign up that you wish to join via Zoom. You will then be sent an email with the link to the meeting. Council Notes: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Upload Date P&Z Meeting Minutes Minutes 3/9/2020 Updated Staff Report Cover Memo 4/8/2020 REVIEWERS: Department Reviewer Action Date Clerk. Johnson, Chris Approved 4/7/2020 -6:51 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 136 of 242 4/14/2020 City of Meridian-Public Hearing Sign In Form Tools Details and Signatures For Public Hearing Hearing Date: 4/14/2020 Hearing Type: Council Item Number: 6-J Project Name: Bannock Ridge MDA, PP Project No.: H-2019-0143 Active: Signature HOA HOA I Wish To Sign In Sign-In Email For Neutral Against Name Name Represent Participate Date/Time 4/6/2020 Aneke anekebinford@gmail.com X X 2:13:11 Binford PM Matt 4/7/2020 Binford anekebinford@gmail.com X 4:54:49 PM Ryan 4/7/2020 Recla Ryan@ida-ore.com X X 5:35:38 PM Southen 4/7/2020 annette annettejalonso@gmail.com Rim X X 6:57:23 alonso Coalition PM Go Back To List Export To Excel ©2020 - City of Meridian, Idaho internalapps/SIGNINFORMTOOLS/SignlnFormDetails?id=456 1/1 STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING April 14,2020 �� DATE: Continued from: 41712020 ( e TO: Mayor&City Council =_- FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton,Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2019-0143 Bannock Ridge LOCATION: 2940 S. Mesa Way(Parcel #R4814130225; SE '/4 of Section 29, � �J T.3N.,R.IE.) I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Development Agreement modification to remove the subject 4.35 acre property from the 13.58 acre boundary of the existing agreement(Bannock Ridge -Inst. #2017-084176)for the purpose of entering into a new agreement consistent with the proposed development plan; and,Preliminary Plat consisting of 10 building lots and 5 common lots on 4.35 acres of land in the R-4 zoning district. Note: The Assessor's data for the subject parcel lists the acreage as 4.26 acres; however, the surveyor's legal description lists the acreage as 4.35 acres, which the surveyor has confirmed is correct. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 4.35 acres per legal description Existing/Proposed Zoning R-4(existing) Medium Low-Density Residential District Future Land Use Designation Low Density Residential(LDR)(3 or fewer units/acre) Existing Land Use(s) One(1)existing single family residential(SFR)home to remain&agricultural land Proposed Land Use(s) SFR Lots(#and type;bldg./common) 10 SFR buildable lots/5 common lots Phasing Plan(#of phases) 1 phase Number of Residential Units(type 10 detached SFR homes of units) Density(gross&net) 2.35 units/acre(gross); 3.96 units/acre(net) Page 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 156 of 242 Description Details Page Open Space(acres,total 0.82 of an acre(or 11.13%) [%]/buffer/qualified) Amenities Multi-use pathway Physical Features(waterways, The Ten Mile Creek runs along the northern boundary of hazards,flood plain,hillside) the site Neighborhood meeting date;#of 10/16/19; 11 attendees attendees: im History(previous approvals) Lot 3,Block 2,Kachina Estates Subdivision;H-2017-0050 (Bannock Ridge-Development Agreement Inst.#2017- 074176;preliminary plat expired) B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Yes • Requires ACHD No Commission Action es/no Access Access from S.Mesa Way via a common driveway and E.Loggers (Arterial/Collectors/State Pass St.,both local public streets. Hwy/Local)(Existing and Proposed) Traffic Level of Service E.Victory Rd. -"F"(currently exceeds ACHD's acceptable level of service during PM peak hour—trips generated from this site will contribute less than 2%to the total PM peak hour traffic on Victory) Stub E. Loggers Pass St.at west boundary is proposed to be extended Street/Interconnectivity/Cross through the site and stubbed to the south Access Existing Road Network Local public streets Existing Arterial Sidewalks/ NA Buffers Required Road Improvements Complete S.Mesa Way as a 33' street section with pavement widening, curb,gutter and 5'wide sidewalk within 50'of right-of-way(ROW) abutting the site;and extend E.Loggers Pass St. as a 33' local street section with curb,gutter&5' sidewalk within 47' of ROW to southern boundary of site with a temporary cul-de-sac turnaround. Capital Improvements Plan(CIP)1 Integrated Five Year Work Plan(IFYWP): • An enhanced pedestrian crossing is scheduled in the IFYWP to be installed on Victory Road at Timber Avenue in 2020. • Locust Grove Road is scheduled in the IFYWP to be widened to 5-lanes from Victory Road to Overland Road in 2022. • The intersection of Victory Road and Locust Grove Road is scheduled in the IFYWP to be constructed as a multi-lane roundabout in 2021. • Locust Grove Road and Bridge Number 2087 is scheduled in the IFYWP to be reconstructed/widened in 2022. • Victory Road is listed in the CIP to be widened to 3-lanes from Meridian Road(SH-68)to Locust Grove Road between 2026 and 2030. • Victory Road is listed in the CIP to be widened to 3-lanes from Locust Grove Road to Eagle Road between 2021 and 2025. Fire Service • Distance to Fire Station 1.9 miles Page 2 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 157 of 242 Description Details Page • Fire Response Time 4:00 minutes under ideal conditions from nearest station(Fire Station #4)—can meet response time goals • Resource Reliability 79%-does meet the targeted goal of 80%or greater • Risk Identification 2—current resources would not be adequate to supply service • Accessibility Project meets all required access,road widths and turnaround. • Special/resource needs Project will not require an aerial device;can meet this need in the required timeframe if a truck company is required. • Water Supply Requires 1,000 gallons per minute for one hour,may be less if buildings are fully sprinklered. • Other Resources Police Service No comments submitted Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Directly adjacent Services • Sewer Shed Ten Mile Trunk Shed • Estimated Project Sewer 10 SFR buildings ERU's • WRRF Declining 13.82 Balance • Project Consistent with Yes WW Master Plan/Facility Plan • Sewer Review Concerns The preliminary civil plans submitted with this application do not show sewer and water facilities,therefore conceptual review could not be completed. Water • Distance to Water Directly adjacent Services • Pressure Zone • Estimated Project Water 10 SFR building ERU's • Water Quality None • Project Consistent with Yes Water Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns The preliminary civil plans submitted with this application do not show sewer and water facilities,therefore conceptual review could not be completed. Page 3 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 158 of 242 1 1 1 .NINE u' ■Nog...•* u•.:oil ■ - uuu II ■on _ --� ■Emso■ uuu �■ Il llll : u0 10 ■■ i .Emmons- 1 uull'- ■ 1■■■� ■uuul . SIG ■ _■ �■- l■' �-' - III••11111� Y■ • �. 111iiil�■+ 1 IIII 1.1Milli I NO 2 ■ �II��1 i,' - r - l 111 �■ IIII �• i--- �1 �. i''�' r !R NONE■r NONE ONE ' y ■ol NE■■N■ N ! JE•.� SEISMSf` -■ ■a - ■ - ■■l l W� - - � u I �I ■ ■ U•IA■ HIME ■ = I1111 -�SEISE ��-_ __-_ I' { - 1 _ in e lull 3' ■u■unn■flul - -` .I _ - - - 1 wN64+ ■III IIRiI:1uu -w � - :.— 1111■11 -uuuw_ +uua•u uuuu --'_' �vuiiu Illl IIIIIIRi IIII -5 Illllllll -�� _ _ }y'� '��M1_y��11I111111I uuuu•er unu - uuu uuuu = -. uElhiGiil ��uu uu ■nSuuw uu■■ �1 � _ - � s SEEMS ■■ mom on■■ Ming u■ Ming■■■ 1■■■■III 1■1■■III ■uuu ■uuu • ■II ■u ■II ■u ■ENEE■- Emmons- ■1■1■1 Emmons ■ IIIIII : u■1■1■ ra son■ ■EEEEE■- ■on■son- luull- ■ INN N uuuu IS- on INS �I i•'liiiig ■ IN' ■ 1I uwgEll - l■' Y■ 11111111�■+ ' �■+ Illl = 1111 -IN II _ II 7III •�li 7■ 1 ■ ■ •�lilll i 7■ k ■ �u�n Ill,uuuu �■ ■■I■■■ -Ill,uuuu �■ ■■I■■■ i--_ !R ■■■■ wR ■■■■■r uuuu■ A y ..I ■�M■N■ ■u J1 ■: IIIIII �� ■�M■-- : ONE ■ 11 I7Caa1: _ 11■1 _ f _ E111 ■ ■ � Ili �- _I � ■ ■ � Ili �- ��_� � I cull , — iE ■■■ y10I 11111111 ,i-111i -SEEN■ � "'1 _--- I -SEEN■ � - I1111"' G L _-- -IIIIII ■EI�EII■ -��_ -IIIIII = II III _�■EI�EII■ - _ �I11r1�_`_ III = I I uuuu 1% o IIIII 3 ■11111111 N�1111 - o lull 0 111'.u■11I.111 N■1111 = lllNy6+�uI:ul■nuuu -uuuw + •u uuuu -uuuw'S� uu uu a -s uuuw -=1 uu uuuullll 111111111E IIIIII �: uuu IIIIII■I uuuuu IIIIII �: uuu IIIIII■' ��1111 111 uuuuu I 1■■ �141111 11111�� uuuuu 1■11■■'03 - Illu El uuuu : - IlluEl uuuu : III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Ryan Recla—914 S. McDermott Rd.,Nampa, ID 83687 B. Owner: Alan&Rose Marsh—2940 S. Mesa Way,Meridian, ID 83642 C. Representative: Dan Lardie,Leavitt&Associates Engineers,Inc.— 1324 1st Street South,Nampa, ID 83651 IV. NOTICING Planning&Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Notification published in 2/14/2020 3/20/2020 newspaper Notification mailed to property owners within 300 feet 2/11/2020 3/18/2020 Applicant posted public hearing notice on site 2/20/2020 3/20/2020 Nextdoor posting 2/11/2020 3/18/2020 V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS(Comprehensive Plan) (Note: This project was submitted prior to the new Comprehensive Plan being adopted; therefore, this project is being evaluated under the previous Plan) The Future Land Use Map(FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Medium Density Residential(MDR). The purpose of the MDR designation is to allow small lots for residential purposes within City limits. Uses may include single-family homes at gross densities of 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The following Comprehensive Plan Policies are applicable to this development: • "Support a variety of residential categories (low-, medium-, medium-high and high-density single-family, multi-family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities."(3.07.01E) The proposed detached homes will contribute to the variety of residential categories in the City; Staff is unaware how "affordable"the units will be. • "Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is contiguous to the City."(3.01.0117) City services are available and will be extended by the developer to the proposed lots upon development of the subdivision in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. • "Protect existing residential properties from incompatible land use development on adjacent parcels." (3.06.0117) The abutting uses are also single-family residential which are compatible with the proposed development. Page 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 160 of 242 • "Require common area in all subdivisions."(3.07.02F) The proposed plat depicts a total of 0.82 of an acre (or 11.1301o) of common area; because the property is below 5 acres in size, the UDC does not require 10%common area. • "Require all new development to create a site design compatible with surrounding uses through buffering, screening,transitional densities, and other best site design practices." (3.07.01A) The site abuts rural S+/-acre lots to the north and south and urban density residential lots to the west. Staff believes the proposed lot layout, design and density is compatible with surrounding uses. The common area with the multi-use pathway proposed along the south boundary and the common area and creek along the north boundary of the site will provide a buffer between the proposed development and the adjacent rural properties. • "Implement the City's Pathways Master Plan to provide a bike and pathways system between neighborhoods,local collectors, and community destinations.Work with new development, ITD,ACHD,COMPASS,Ada County, and other entities to identify partnership opportunities." (6.02.01A) A segment of the City's multi-use pathway system is designated on the Pathways Master Plan along the Ten Mile Creek along the north boundary of this site. The Applicant has worked with the Park's Dept. to provide the pathway in an alternate location on this site as depicted on the landscape plan. • "Require new urban density subdivisions which abut or are proximal to existing low density residential land uses to provide landscaped screening or transitional densities with larger, more comparable lot sizes to buffer the interface between urban level densities and rural residential densities." The proposed urban density subdivision abuts rural S+/-acre residential properties to the north and south; the proposed linear open space areas along the north and south boundaries of the site combined with larger lots (8,000+ square feet) will transition between urban level densities and rural residential densities. • "Encourage infill development."(4.04.01 T) The subject property and adjacent S+/-acre lots in Kachina Estates Subdivision are surrounded by medium low-density residential developments; development of the subject infill property will result in a better provision of City services. • "Review new development for appropriate opportunities to connect local roads and collectors to adjacent properties (stub streets). (3.03.020) The proposed plat depicts the extension of an existing local stub street(E. Loggers Pass St.) at the west boundary stubbing to the property to the south for future extension. Staff believes the proposed development plan is consistent with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density and transportation. VI. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ANALYSIS UD A. Development Agreement Modification: The applicant proposes to modify the recorded Development Agreement(Inst. #2017-074176) that governs development of the subject property and the property to the south(Parcel Page 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 161 of 242 #R4814130200)to remove the subject property from the agreement and enter into a new agreement consistent with the proposed development plan. The existing DA provisions and previously approved preliminary plat and concept building elevations are included in Section VIII.A. The existing preliminary plat depicts 7 (and portions of 3 other)buildable lots on this property with the extension of the stub street from the west to the south boundary and retention of the existing home on the northern portion of the site similar to the proposed plat but with access to the proposed lots from the south and not via S.Mesa Way. Because the proposed development plan is similar to the existing plan and generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Staff is supportive of the request for a modification to the DA. Staff recommends the existing applicable DA provisions are carried over to the new DA(and amended as necessary), as they are still applicable to future development of the site and the proposed plat,landscape plan and concept elevations are also included in the new DA(see Section VIII.C,D&E and Section IX.A). If approved,the modified DA must be signed by the property owner(s)and returned to the City within 6 months of the City Council granting the modification. B. Preliminary Plat: The proposed plat consists of 10 buildable lots and 5 common lots on 4.35 acres of land in the R- 4 zoning district. The minimum lot size in the R-4 district is 8,000 sq. ft. The minimum lot size proposed is 8,001 square feet(s.f.)with a maximum lot size of 30,958 s.f. on the lot where the existing home is proposed to remain. The gross density is 2.34 units/acre. The subdivision is proposed to develop in one phase. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There is one (1) existing home and accessory structures on the site that are proposed to remain on Lot 10, Block 1. Any structures that do not comply with the minimum setbacks of the R-4 district should be removed or the lot line(s) should be adjusted to comply; the southern- most accessory structure on Lot 10,Block 1 does not comply with the minimum 15 foot rear setback—the plat should be revised to comply or the structure removed. Proposed Use Analysis: Single-family detached dwellings are listed as a principal permitted use in the R-4 zoning district in UDC Table 11-2A-2. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The proposed development is subject to the dimensional standards of the R-4 district listed in UDC Table 11-2A-5. The R-4 district requires a minimum of 60 feet of street frontage;the street frontage of Lot 2,Block 2 does not appear to be dimensioned correctly,the plat should be revised to demonstrate compliance. The remainder of the lots comply with UDC standards. Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards(UDC 11-6C-3) Development of the subdivision is required to comply with the subdivision design and improvement standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3, including but not limited to streets and common driveways. There are two(2)common driveways proposed; such driveways should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. Staff recommends the common driveway proposed to provide access to Lots 12 and 13,Block 1 be located in a common lot,rather than on Lot 12,Block 1. An exhibit should be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks, fencing,building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via the Page 7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 162 of 242 common driveway; if a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street,the driveway should be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited,unless separated by a minimum 5-foot wide landscape buffer. A perpetual ingress/egress easement for the common driveways should be filed with the Ada County Recorder,which should include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment; a recorded copy of said easements should be submitted to the Planning Division prior to or concurrent with submittal of the final plat for the City Engineer's signature. Access(UDC 11-3A-31 Access is proposed via the extension of an existing stub street,E. Loggers Pass St., at the west boundary of the site,which is proposed to stub to the southern boundary of the subdivision for future extension. Two(2)common driveways are proposed to provide access to Lots 12 and 13, Block 1 and Lots 3-5, 7-8 and 10,Block 1 as depicted on the plat. Address signage should be placed at the public street for wayfinding purposes for homes accessed by common driveways. Parking(UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11- 3C-6 for single-family detached dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit.Future development should comply with these standards. Pathways(UDC 11-3A-8): The Pathways Master Plan depicts a 10-foot wide multi-use pathway along the southwest side of the Ten Mile Creek on this site. The Applicant proposes an alternate location for the pathway through the subdivision in general alignment with the creek as approved by the Park's Department. The 10'wide pathway is required to be placed within a public pedestrian easement as required by the Park's Department.Landscape note#6 states the pathway shall be 5' wide; the width should be changed to 10' wide as graphically depicted. There is a short off-site segment(10'+/-) of the multi-use pathway in Glacier Springs Subdivision at the northwest corner of this site that did not get completed with that development leaving a gap in the pathway system.The existing DA contains a provision for the missing section to be completed with this development if approval can be obtained from the Glacier Springs HOA. Staff recommends this provision is carried over to the new DA. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-1 : Attached sidewalks are required along internal and adjacent local streets in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. A 10' wide multi-use pathway is proposed along the west side of S.Mesa Way and along the east side of E. Loggers Pass Way in place of the typical 5-foot wide sidewalk. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): Landscaping is required along all pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B- 12C. A mix of trees,shrubs,lawn and/or other vegetative groundcover shall be depicted in the common lot adjacent to the multi-use pathway in accord with UDC 11-313-12C.2.The total lineal feet of pathways with the required and proposed number of trees should be included in the Landscape Calculations table on the final plat landscape plan to demonstrate compliance with UDC standards. Page 8 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 163 of 242 Mitigation is required for all existing trees 4"caliper or greater that are removed from the site with equal replacement of the total calipers lost onsite up to an amount of 100%replacement as set forth in UDC 11-3B-1OC.5; mitigation information should be included in the Landscape Calculations table and depicted on the plan. Street buffers are not required along local streets (i.e. E. Loggers Pass St./Way and S. Mesa Way). Qualified Open Space(UDC 11-3G�: Because the area of the proposed plat is below 5 acres in size,the qualified open space standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B do not apply. However, common area is proposed where a segment of the City's regional pathway system is planned through the subdivision and where the Ten Mile Creek is located totaling 11% of common open space. Qualified Site Amenities(UDC 11-3G1: Because the area of the proposed plat is below 5 acres in size,the qualified site amenity standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3C do not apply. However, a segment of the City's regional pathway system is proposed as an amenity through this subdivision. Storm Drainage: Storm drainage ponds are proposed as shown on the preliminary plat on(common)Lot 1,Block 2 and(buildable)Lot 8,Block 1. Storm drainage ponds should be provided on common lots, rather than buildable lots; the plat and landscape plan should be revised accordingly. Waterways(UDC 11-3A- : The Ten Mile Creek runs along the northern boundary of this site and is required to remain open as a natural waterway and should not be piped or otherwise covered as set forth in UDC 11-3A- 6B.1 and should be protected during construction. Fencing(UDC 11-3A- : All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. The existing fence along the west and south boundaries of the site is proposed to remain;no new fencing is proposed along the subdivision boundary. Wrought iron fencing should be graphically depicted on the plan in accord with Landscape Note#5 and UDC 11-3A-7A.7a which requires the Developer to construct fences abutting pathways and common open space lots to distinguish common from private areas. A 6' tall chain link fence is proposed along the portion of the multi-use pathway that is adjacent to the Ten Mile Creek on Lot 11,Block 1. Staff recommends the type of fencing is changed to wrought iron to match that proposed along the rear of building lots abutting the pathway for consistency. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): The Applicant submitted conceptual elevations of homes planned to be constructed in this development which are included in Section VIII.E. Homes depicted are a single-story and a single-story with a bonus room over the garage with a variety and mix of finish materials consisting of horizontal and vertical siding, and stucco with stone/brick veneer accents; 2-story homes aren't shown but may also be constructed. VII. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the requested modification to the Development Agreement and preliminary plat with the conditions noted in Section IX.A per the Findings in Section X. Page 9 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 164 of 242 B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on March 5,2020. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject PP request. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Dan Lardie,Leavitt&Associates,Applicant's Representative;Ryan Recla b. In opposition:None c. Commenting: Aneke Binford,Matt Binford, Celeste Blackburn,Jamie Clausen d. Written testimony: Dan Lardie,Leavitt&Associates,Applicant's Representative(in agreement with staff report) e. Staff presenting gpplication: Bill Parsons f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony; a. Concern from the homeowner's to the south(Binford's)pertaining to lack of substantial buffering between the public walking path and the full length of their property; and the impact on their ability effectively irrigate their land. They request a good neighbor fence &a more substantial vegetative buffer along the pathway to clearly, distinguish the public from private property to discourage trespassing&protect their privacy, and a berm alongtheir heir property to allow them to continue to effectively(flood) irrigate their ro e b. Preference for the multi-use pathway to follow the creek consistent with the pathway in adjacent developments rather than jog through the proposed neighborhood; C. Concern that the proposed development isn't consistent with the existing CC&R's for the subdivision(i.e. Kachina Estates); d. Complaint pertaining to the neighborhood meetingri.e.the time of day it was held when nobody could attend and that it was held in a place where there wasn't much room(in a pub/restaurant)—they didn't provide a space for them to meet as the,, thought hought no one would show upl; e. Concern that the proposed homes in the development won't be compatible with existing homes in the area. 3. Ke. ids)of discussion by Commission: a. The new preliminary plat won't trigger minimum qualified open space & site amenity standards since the site is below 5 acres in size,whereas the existing plat does—would prefer more open space is provided; b. Preference for the three(3)original parcels to develop together as currently platted rather than splitting this one (and possibly others)off into individual developments; c. Preference for a berm, fence and landscaping to be constructed by the Developer along the southern boundary adjacent to the Binford property; d. Preference for Lot 2,Block 2 to be a common area lot rather than a buildable lot for a future retention pond/space. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Add a DA provision requiring the Developer to construct a berm no less than 18-inches tall along the southern boundary of the development with fencing on both sides of the pathway and landscaping between the pathway and fence—the Applicant should work with the adjacent property owners(Binford's)on an agreeable berm height/placement and enhanced landscapingprior to the Council meeting for presentation at the Council hearing see Section IX,A.lh,; and, b. Add a condition requiring Lot 2,Block 2 to be converted from a buildable to a common lot(see conditions#2h and Of). 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. None Page 10 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 165 of 242 VIII. EXHIBITS A. Existing Development Agreement Provisions(Inst. #2017-084176) 665. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1.Owner and/or Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat, landscape plan and building elevations depicted in the Staff Report attached to Exhibit B, Findings of Fact Conclusions of Law. b. The Owners and/or Developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the sewer and water service extension. c. All of the existing homes proposed to remain on lots within the subdivision are required to hook up to City water and sewer service within 60 days of it being available to said lots. d. Any and all existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service,per City Ordinance 5-7-517,when services are available from the City of Meridian. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. e. The Ten Mile Creek shall be improved as necessary and protected during development. The creek shall remain open as a natural amenity and not be piped or otherwise covered. f. If 2-story homes are constructed on Lots 11 and 12,Block 2,they will be highly visible from E.Victory Road, an arterial street. Therefore,the rear elevations of 2-story homes shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: material type,projections,recesses, step-backs,bays,banding,pop-outs,porches,balconies or other architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines. This does not apply to single-story homes. g. A 10-foot wide segment of the City's multi-use pathway system that crosses this site is required to be constructed within a 14-foot wide public use easement in accord with the Pathways Master Plan per the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8 and 11-3B-12C. Submit the easement to the Planning Division with the final plat application for approval by City Council and subsequent recordation. h. If permission can be obtained from the Glacier Springs Homeowner's Association to the west,the developer shall extend and connect the multi-use pathway off-site to the existing pathway which stops short of the property line by approximately 10 feet." Page 11 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 166 of 242 3k { � ji - 1 ON +m1u 6 J A x • g 15� I A? — It, � �. � I � � sp •x S��x� FIR; ��a S ��I IX 4� $ ■ : i n n Z94 ill.$ �0 1 3 y^I 4-I " O P' ■ 8 O P■ b b 41 LEAv17-r&aALssoclA7ES BAF{F{¢C,N RI�C�E$U q�VI$�4N W FJCi1NEFF7ti,iiVis PRELIMINARYPLAT asssrrwcaLWALu avlt } T"L■EVELOPYIEM LI,C $SMVE�'�/AO s{ne Ee�r�•m SMVY.CAOTALPACOOR! 1 C�4r AIM A]}7] REV191OH9 P..3- In, Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 167 of 242 BANNOCK RIDG£ SUMVISIDN PRELIMINARY PLAT \ . § .\ H / ( . _ \ / § - - _ § R � f . - � �■�\ . �; m � \ < SL . wk. � - / �■ . . _ || U, — _ p RJ - f 'E . . - . ®, ! .y Page !a — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April w,ym- Page 1ga&2 B. Legal Description&Exhibit Map of Property Subject to New Development Agreement Description For BANNOCK RIDGE SUBDIVISION Lot 3, Block 2 of Kachina Estates Subdivision as filed in Book 35 of Plats at Page 3016 and 3017, records of Ada County, Idaho, located in the Southwest 114 of the Southeast 114 of Section 19,Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian,Ada County. Idaho being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the$114 corner of said Section 19 from which the SE corner of said Section 19 bears North 89°42'05" East, 2639.98 feet; thence along the South boundary line of said Section 19 North 89°QW'East, 635.81 feet to the SW corner of said I(achina Estates Subdivision; thence leaving said South boundary line and along the westerly boundary line of said Kachina Estates Subdivision Wirth 12"24'22"West, 170.09 feet; thence continuing along said westerly boundary line North 00°1950"East,729.59 feet to the SW corner of said Lot 3, said point also being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING: thence along the westerly boundary line of said Lot 3 North OGQ19'50"East,444,51 feet to the id1N corner of said Lot 3, thence along the northeasterly boundary line of said Lot 3 South 50°27'35"East,803.01 feet to the NE corner of said Lot 3; thence along the southeasterly boundary line of said Lot 3 the following 2 courses and distances: thence South 39°27'06"Vilest, 76.42 feet: thence 111.27 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 1601 38 feet. a central angle of 39"45'02"and a long chord which bears South 19034'36"West, 109.05 feet to the SE corner of said Lot 3; thence along the southwesterly boundary line of said Lot 3 !North 66'56'33" West. 583.33 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 4.345 acres. more or less, >r % �)J fl �}+F r9�� Page 14 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 169 of 242 CURVE TABLE CURVE R ms LENGTH CHORD >ST D BRA I DELTA g 1�Q 2 r K r 109.s 9 «X¥ 3B�5'a2 UNE TABLE . ENE LENGTH BEARING u 76.42 !D� rw § p § t 44 / G am \ Z [ KACHINA ESWES 7729 m DXCK 2 \Z, e 0 k OF: $ £y POINT 3 rc 2 . 7 KGNN� 3d 4G� �� / X 66. \ 2 A, / • EA CREK j \ mBOAS40N 2 BLOCK � . z I � I I ' f g � k� � 1 19 a&$' _ zzzzz � .._ ... 19 30 N /9' ' E i■j,.' m g BASIS 7 BEARING E. VICTORY R> m ,3 _ se o m 2m SCALE: l" = 120' I#H 0 EXHe17 DRAWING FOR Of. wFRMDr BANNOCK RIDGE SUBDIVISION ST NG. SURVEY 'rA GROUP, [LC _wm«, 4OF�� 19. . �m9 ® mo._ _ C 2123 Page 15 — — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April w,ym- Page 13a&2 C. Proposed Preliminary Plat(date: 1/3/20) BANNOCK RIDGE SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT ® U,; T3N,R.IE,SEC.19,ADA COUNTY,MERIDIAN,IDAHO I'W 201% P PMCEL sere aZ EL NC.R1914130225 w .. �� i Mtfia t \ fid Y .•.e..n a u�xnw wn..mw,a w�wnua.�nuM m:e.u.yr 9�PP u.v/xosmw ms b�dt LINEMLS: Q zp ME w w'� n a a A89REMATIONSo�rxu..cv m •..., �� .�. `` - `` 1 pia -n� ` $E M�e _� Page 16 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 171 of 242 D. Proposed Landscape Plan(date: 12/9/2019) Q_ °w ;a -77 mw.womom mu�iwzwwrs A•l,.u.m.�..��ea_°mn ^€ l �m"E�'r rxw ._.�..V w�w,ax mows-wuic ww ww=.s�sxs TM wrr�ec�r xn wwrz v �' i 11 5 g m o wmwm owe wm.c wo xr.v m�AZ— 0 ...... �.ma�.ue emrnnnn awv.as wmmw uo xx .gym ©Y Za 8 0 ELM dzOz tl LE HUI r j •-o$ O � Wt+w L1.0 Page 17 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 172 of 242 E. Proposed Conceptual Building Elevations w y� b _ E: i �W E� v.VVATION to mq �Sp) a0 zrc os R�z REARREAR E,M� Ww may• i o ----- FR. -----_----- ------ --- -- - ---- -= ai FRONT ELEVATON O6Ys6v^® FRONT ELEVATION --� gcal.vecl'� wU yy �Wg dr Et FRONT ELEVATON REAR ELEVATION ��V1+14' m^ _h Oa W� ig 6I=¢ O f/l W x e 0 g ON oo < _ - o �EwW FRONT ELEVATION scu<.va,ra� ® ® ae e a REAR ELEVATION s o ex-z Page 18 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020- Page 173 of 242 IX. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. The subject property shall no longer be subject to the terms of the existing Development Agreement(DA) (Inst. #2017-074176)upon the property owner(s) entering into a new agreement. The new DA shall be signed by the property owner(s)and returned to the City within 6 months of City Council granting the subject modification. The new DA shall include the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat, landscape plan and building elevations depicted in the Staff Report attached to Exhibit B, Findings of Fact Conclusions of Law. b. The Owner(s)and/or Developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the sewer and water service extension. c. The existing home to remain on Lot 10,Block 1 is required to hook up to City water and sewer service within 60 days of it being available to said lot. d. The existing domestic well and/or septic system on Lot 10,Block 1 shall be removed from its domestic service,per City Ordinance 5-7-517,when services are available from the City of Meridian.Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. e. The Ten Mile Creek shall be improved as necessary and protected during development. The creek shall remain open as a natural amenity and not be piped or otherwise covered. f. A 10-foot wide segment of the City's multi-use pathway system that crosses this site is required to be constructed within a 14-foot wide public use easement in accord with the Pathways Master Plan per the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8 and 11-313-12C. Submit the easement to the Planning Division with the final plat application for approval by City Council and subsequent recordation. g. If permission can be obtained from the Glacier Springs Homeowner's Association to the west,the developer shall extend and connect the multi-use pathway off-site to the existing pathway which stops short of the property line by approximately 10 feet.If permission cannot be obtained, documentation as such should be submitted(i.e. a letter from the Glacier Springs HOA). h. The Developer shall construct a berm no less than 18-inches tall along the southern boundary of the development with fencing on both sides of the pathway and landscaping between the pathway and fence. The Applicant shall work with the adjacent property owners(Binford's) on an agreeable berm height/placement and enhanced landscaping prior to the Council meeting for presentation at the Council hearing. 2. The preliminary plat included in Section VIII.C, dated 1/3/20, shall be revised as follows prior to submittal of the final plat application: a. Correct the acreage depicted on the plat to be 4.35 instead of 4.26 acres per the legal description in Section VIII.B as verified by the Surveyor. b. The storm drainage pond depicted on Lot 8,Block 1 shall be located in a common Iot rather than a buildable lot. c. Lot 2,Block 2 shall have a minimum street frontage of 60 feet in accord with UDC Table 11-2A-5. Page 19 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 174 of 242 d. The southern-most accessory structure on Lot 10, Block 1 shall have a minimum 15-foot wide rear setback, or shall be removed,in accord with UDC Table 11-2A-5. e. Note#10: "Lot 2,Block 1 is a common lot to provide access to Lots 3-45, 7-8 and Let 10,Block 1 to be owned and maintained by the Homeowner's Association." f. The common driveway proposed for access to Lots 12 and 13,Block 1 shall be located within a common lot consistent with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. g. Revise the"Typical 10' wide multi-use pathway section along Ten Mile Creek"detail on Sheet 1 to reflect 6' wrought iron fencing instead of chain link fencing. h. Lot 2,Block 2 shall be converted from a buildable lot to a common lot. Submit a revised plat(and electronic copy) to the Planning Division at least 10 days prior to the City Council hearing. 3. The landscape plan included in Section VIII.D, dated 12/9/19, shall be revised as follows prior to submittal of the final plat application: a. The storm drainage pond depicted on Lot 8,Block 1 shall be located in a common lot rather than a buildable lot. b. A calculations table shall be included on the plan that details the total lineal feet of the multi-use pathway with the required and proposed number of trees to demonstrate compliance with UDC 11-3B-12C; and mitigation information for all existing trees 4" caliper or greater that are removed from the site that require mitigation as determined by the City Arborist, demonstrating compliance with UDC 11-3B-1OC.5. c. A mix of trees, shrubs, lawn and/or other vegetative groundcover shall be depicted in the common lot adjacent to the multi-use pathway in accord with UDC 11-3B-12C.2. d. Graphically depict wrought iron along the rear of buildable lots adjacent to the multi-use pathway in accord with Landscape Note#5 and UDC 11-3A-7A.7a,which requires the Developer to construct fencing abutting pathways and common open space lots to distinguish common from private. Wrought iron fencing, instead of chain link, shall also be provided along the pathway adjacent to the Ten Mile Creek on Lot 11,Block 1 for consistency. e. Correct Landscape Note#6: "Pathway shown shall be constructed of concrete and be-5 10' wide." f. Lot 2,Block 2 shall be converted to a common lot and landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3E. 4. Future development shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-5 for the R-4 zoning district. 5. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family detached dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 6. An exhibit shall be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks, fencing, building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures accessed via the common driveway; if a property abuts a common driveway but has the required minimum street frontage and is taking access via the public street,the driveway shall be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line from the common driveway as set forth in UDC 11- 6C-3D. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited,unless separated by a minimum 5-foot wide landscape buffer. Page 20 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 175 of 242 7. A perpetual ingress/egress easement for the common driveways shall be filed with the Ada County Recorder,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment; a recorded copy of said easements shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to or concurrent with submittal of the final plat for the City Engineer's signature. 8. Address signage shall be placed at the public street for wayfinding purposes for homes accessed by common driveways. 9. A public pedestrian easement, as required by the Park's Department, for the multi-use pathway shall be submitted to the Planning Division for the multi-use pathway that runs through this subdivision prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 The street name/address for the existing home to remain in this development will most likely change with the new platting. 1.2 A street light plan will need to be included in the final plat application. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the City's Design Standards. Type 1 streetlights are required on E.Victory Road every 200'. 1.3 The preliminary civil plans submitted with this application do not show sewer and water facilities,therefore conceptual review could not be completed. 1.4 No sewer mainlines in common drives, only sewer services(the maximum of three services are allowed into a manhole,with a minimum 30-degrees of angle separation). 1.5 Per the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report submitted with this application; If clay soils are present after crawl space excavation,the contractor shall be required to contract a geotechnical engineer to evaluate the clay soil. Foundations are not to be constructed atop fat, expansive clay soils unless approved by a professional engineer. Removal and replacement of unacceptable soils may be required. Specific recommendations are to be provided to the City of Meridian Building Official for each lot where clay soils are present at the foundation support elevation. 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description Page 21 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 176 of 242 prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x 11"map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year- round source of water(MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals,or drains, exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B.Whitney at(208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing,landscaping, amenities, etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer,an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. Page 22 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 177 of 242 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting.A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT https:llweblink.meridiancity.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=181403&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC hty D. POLICE DEPARTMENT No comments were submitted E. PARK's DEPARTMENT https://weblink.m eridia n c i ty.ory/WeUink/Browse.aspx?id=181241&dbid=0&1epo=MeridianCit &y cry I Page 23 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 178 of 242 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and, The Commission is not aware of any health,safety, or environmental problems associated with the platting of this property. ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The Commission is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that exist on this site that require preserving. Page 25 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 180 of 242 F. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO(COMPASS) No comments were received. G. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=182430&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Lty H. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancity.orzlWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=181355&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Lty I. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=181372&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianC hty J. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https://weblink.meridianciN.orgJ ebLink/DocView.aspx?id=183001&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Lty X. FINDINGS A. Preliminary Plat Findings: In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat, the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; The Commission finds that the proposed plat is in general conformance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, density, transportation, and pedestrian connectivity. (Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies in, Section V of this report for more information) 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Commission finds that public services will be provided to the subject property with development. (See Exhibit B of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers) 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the development at their own cost, the Commission finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Commission finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development based upon comments from the public service providers (i.e., Police, Fire, ACHD, etc). (See Section IXfor more information) Page 24 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 179 of 242 BANNOCK RIDGE SUBDIVISION SYMBOLS: FIZ, CUS NG swarm sexy BAN HOLE: Lu v $p �. Q$ INSTAL M SAHRARY SEWER Nx01f 'I m n n PRELIMINARY PLAT SITE SUM CREAGE is © EM THG GMO IPPoCAnON �. TOTAL LOT - - 4.3E AC mvT GRABBY RREGAWN o N a 2 P^ \\ `\ T.3N,R.1E,SEC.19,ADA COUNTY,MERIDIAN,IDAHO RESIDENLTfi LOM-9(+ 1 EXISTING) 0 DEMNG VALVE on: ; C ZO19 EASING HOMES TO REMAIN -1 0 RISTAL WATER MBE U)W N S R SrrECOMMON LOTS- 5 Q O \\ PARCEL PROJECT R4814130225 _ x max].m+D.Lnm+vurE z Uco \\\\ QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE'-]N/A 911. 3S.SW Z W co ? ® plsrxG wA1ER uEIER �TI FRUIT OF WAY AREA -14.910 5R.R. -B.OIT ® NsDIL am MEICI V Co m B DENSITY LOT PER ACRE-2.34/AC N.OwM FSTA e E W BLOW-OFF VALVE Z awa \ �. NET OEN4tt.S.BW DU/AC d \ +•,\ , . SOeDYE1 Y 1. i MINIMUM O'AF111NG SIZE. 1,400 P ® MA]L B.OI vALVE Qa WW 9 \ \\•;\O. E. LOGCm6 1 f (] DUSING ME HYDMM WPA55 Si. x5M1L fNE HYORrM JNOTES: b q 1. OMM ECNNe aAS5eIG1M1t C..R-I. STORM WATER TLDx w YI o L SWMN BOAM V=N NL WIGYpWCCr'MIx Me CITY SENW SYAFL Cm L WIIIfi PA4 ETEMEi Bahl SMEET IIBnAND B IBM wy. 6 ], w9w Miw wu IxIFFtbe6!xIM M[ON IY1LN w'15 x F.IOSfPS x55 SRTFr.S IWJ COSMIC IFERG11gN PUP-RUT y > ,�. , wM. m xsbu NBICAIAx wMP-our f, a, QyY(p, .P } < MNGAIAx x'ARN Wu m RIFAID x ra EmTNA nwGLnox wMP SAM ro ME NEST x ax6A -: 11M:SF W \ ?p �i C 9 �1 3 sflw13 ML MIfInTXx¢Im 1G WFW CRm:A.HiA9M. NWP1-YW WX IIdIG1SN xLaM6 fA511HG CATCH BASIN MET :. 0.RT rc .a c a g O WWW YY ME PYIi SrAM 10 uW W W N.1LCYYLi.S TIE Wa11C1(LL WION. O .h +H+k,•;' R S.NOVAM WAY CONSTRUCT CATCH USSR INLET ): e. ALLIDR NAE n s.MM Ip Y USFI ON ME SEXES.,A 10 I ul'Uf164EMBNI x ME IFM,• v; = b m.o' p r ••�\ •.` p✓q m Fwr Unurc uvuT N ME MAY Mo A a'MIUN ENI a ME B AIWARt ® [aN51mILT PEOESIWI PUMP )SAC$ 1 u + \ - L UR 1.0.0.W 1 G A EW WN LOT FOR TUN MILE CMIX NO CQ I1EtINN N LNTNO I UN USE 0/IP RSr ME W/PERCOLATION ATION $\ 0 1 - - AMar m m axn Nm wxwxm x ra xNLvxxms Asmn.1NN 0#I R __ rtsr IAIE 5� O p :... \ • SIMPNEmx 1 LO15 a MIO 11,BINI 1 NC AW MN I015 NNNWNU M ENTMM ro THE on OF uwWYs GM \\ E PIEMA$f. EBE A E MM ro m mnCO MIO YwwMD x ME IavaNEns A55anlgx. NSIML STOP T SI - NSWL STREET SIGN m VICINITY MAP G 11WE A¢xO 1WN[MKI SItOFS RfpMNp BY'W'[gxM1 NpwAr g51w[r' o.IB Ac h SCALE 1'=400- B. Wrs L L e 4W 1.6105.1,MID IOI L el0al B M m IXSrN1 2-PARTY'MYBUNE BEYiw AE CMI.LAS M BE MW ®® _ - j e n RS O 10,wY BUX0B 1 BY TIE WMA!UU X ASSMIA A A CCITO U 3-6 A. - 1 ` Y m �. 10.W]BIM 1 6 A COMMA!NI ro FRa'OE.YlF4 m WS]- ®�• COMING a r m 4 u a uM W r la W MW f ro m - ' ]r. 9 x: .p` OrXm AM wxmvlm x ra xYlmxxvs ASS¢MIAIL pBOxG UnLLTY POLE _ IYR 13 0 3,BROKE BE ML656 ` w w ARN ' EASnHG UnI11T POLE N/GW III F o E. LOGGERS PA55 ST. - max' -- — - -- m v`� pbTINC BECWCAE em a B fElEP110tE BDN (L BMW 'w 0 INSTAL CLEAN CUT } ffiACB 2 M71 Mom\ •` LINETYPES. Q ---4 BMW CURB k OIDEA _ `�11x0 FYE Ntdarlf - _ _ coxsmWr WE A anew C O j ■� I a y� 3 �YRI' BENCHMARK 1 —ti 95M SWTAM SEWER c m 4yyy r0 •V V^ b , \a\ NEELEO x 5— w5011 SwGMx SEWR MAIN J .. ISTNKMED \ AT BACK 6 SM 9M� W6IN1 SERER SERVICEu O A.AC NAVIN OANM ET6MG Moms,DRINI - (L (m OSI SB o >S Iw ^' SD— INSTIL.sRew MR MAN M E `\J N _ ` o• �.y \ '\.` '/. EYIsnnG III MAN O .A• d - °] . I tl Xa H J LnS\ a /� SCALE: 1" = 40� =w — INSTAL WATER MAIN INSTAL WMEA SDAYE O l \�\. DMING PRESSURE M.B11 Y ` 2 M B It.1 j T x✓>\ \ / -- .. .. J F— IXGNAPGMMY FRGMIN ? J \ 6El AC \_ \ tee` 10 MIAn USE MIIwZ \L BYRY yB \ �: / - LLOT 1INE� __. m0 EE roUS FASB W PEACE TO Tmwx �� j `�`\ O Yzl Ac \ Bm.NIMb/RkSE� MAIN Ae 4 ® c li, —_— CENTER WE W Z N=O Q m e mA'uxN W EBM F 'Bm.W �. ..,tssL �. c Y Q\ _. FAs¢oIf MxF o W n SA' n ` � e 354 — EAm1G COYINR BA T.D IN MW1 y Qa Z rO�aG 8 CP ©s /�. �,• \ -- 016TX0 FOf2 DF PAVEYEXf Z g 2 y S'PENCE ]oA•EwFxFM on am rc a q \ ..._.- DmN10 ohAHpO POwFR Z w OPEN Y6Wl SA' S.0' \ N FO p6YNG FBER OPM a ¢ PER CITY u¢oc ^ \ BMW TELEPHONE m 2 VE h $ ABBREVIATIONS: NRe� 2W-WPWLT MY" Y.'uA.UB r M5 T PAVEMENT 80 FIBRNG W OM.NGL ME ART $ AND r k MFAS 4'W-uxlrs F LOITER LAS W NUR Mm w 14'Ni mx 9 PIT RUN Q a S. MESAWAY TYPI AI 10' WDE Y T I USE PATHWAY SECTION �, m CURCIUEAR OP C ERHEAD POWER ¢ =N TYPI AI µu WffNIN COMMON M -RUTS- -RUTS- M EC EWE Of GRAVE OPP 0PPo91E -- O 2 2 a� CLUM TABLE EL 0_EVATOY B/L FROPERIY WE Q i� ¢ d W 2 WnSReE CURVE RAgUS lFNG1N UIORD pST. mono BRG DRTA n EP EDGE CA PANTUDIT K FOINT OF CUM 0 ORNS ]5'45'OY m W W .B'RNxi w wr 4 S ]53' E CI 'EA- I11.E] I _ I R FM FILE PI PRESSURE BFRCAW way' C@ MV EMEYENi 6.0 34.0' S3' i iG fNxmD CRrOE Pf POINT OF TAIUM s.Y' ]].Y'IexGX TO BACK) sp R. I - - -- - - - - R µow WE S SwRNN SEWER m IG.P Yx. I I _ _ y 1&s' lea• Y CANAL -4 IRO RRE xfDPIM Ex DIMING 9D Srdbl DRUM ~ EGYf !R(1 Ir.O•EASEMENT MANAL Ey�S G S.0 SO' L I ME WICH EE61NG STA. STATION n Lrsx a �� I.Tsx s EExcE m L-- 4N s:l a I G - .\ G.B. ME BREAK IBC_TOP Blgt NRB ¢ m ICI a IN . . . GI GMNIY III mG TEL 1mfFl1OHE VT ITY - K YRNxL¢WALE I., N1flR M. TYPICAL 4-A..XUS Y MAI PAVYAw W Nr RUx I ' f Plj'ASRNLT MMAFNf DE'ASPMLi PAVfl1EMf 4'A'MNUS ORamKE SMILE RT RIGHT W WATER O 4'II'WNU$ C B PIT RUN 4'I{'MNVB . 11 Pn UIN uU lYP AI 10' WIOF Y 1 T le PATMVAY SECTION PRNATE BRIBE i 1 Li. I£iT -TYPICAL STREET SECTION GunOe AfANG TEN YRE CREEK TYP 31 µeI F era[Ff m I THIS DOCUMENT IS'ME PROPERTY M LEAMTT Be ASSOCIATES .vw -RUTS- _N75_ -RUTS- a'fION 1 _ _ IOpBEUSEO�N MOLE OR PART WiHOUTC ANK ME DESIGN AND AWRITiEN S MMINC NSENT NOT I BrtS U�IT2 5i n1pN DNS CURhIA ON OF LEAWTT k ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS.INC. B.TL BEGIN VERnCAL EKE END VERTML u.,•1"m40' x.. CUM ELDATO CURVE OEVAD N E IDIAN --- IDAHO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Agenda Item Number: 6 K Item Title: Meeting Notes: (�E IDI y ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item - 6.K. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item - Public Hearing for Andorra Senior Living (H-2019-0127) by Sawtooth Development Group, LLC, Located at 715 & 955 S. Wells St. and 971 E. Wells Circle Click Here for Application Materials Click Here to Sign Up to Testify at Hearing- If you plan to provide a visual presentation, it must be sent via email to cityclerk@meridiancity.org before Noon on the day of the meeting. You must check the box on the sign up that you wish to join via Zoom. You will then be sent an email with the link to the meeting. Council Notes: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Upload Date P&Z Meeting Minutes Minutes 3/9/2020 P&Z Commission Recommendations and Staff Report Staff Report 4/3/2020 REVIEWERS: Department Reviewer Action Date Clerk. Johnson, Chris Approved 4/7/2020 -6:51 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 181 of 242 STAFF REPORT C�I w IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING April 7,2020 Legend DATE: ff TO: Mayor&City Council I mo ' Lace or FROM: Bill Parsons, Current Planning - Supervisor k f r� 208-884-5533 , Bruce Freckleton,Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 --- ~ SUBJECT: H-2019-0127 Andorra Senior Living LOCATION: Southwest corner of E. Magic View Dr. ' and S. Wells St. at 715 & 955 S. Wells # St. and 971 E. Wells Circle, in the SE 1/4 of Section 17,Township 3N.,Range ---- 1 E. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION NOTE:After the Commission hearing, the applicant provided an update to the concept plan and supplemental information (ROW legal description and utility drawings) in accord with the Commission's recommendation. The staff report is updated in a strike-through and underline format to reflect the recommended changes and incorporates the revised documents. Annexation and zoning of 16.99 acres of land with the TN-R zoning district with a conceptual development plan for a senior living community consisting of 76 single family style dwelling units and a 3-story apartment building with 88 dwelling units AND vacate existing un-named ACHD right- of-way(ROW) (0.45 of an acre)between the 715 and 955 S. Wells St.properties and partial vacation of E. Wells Circle ROW(2,863 sq. ft.) for the extension of this roadway to the west boundary of the rp oject. — Page 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 203 of 242 II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 16.99 Future Land Use Designation(s) MU-N and MDR Existing Land Use Single-family residential/vacant land Proposed Land Use(s) Senior housing(MF) Current Zoning RUT and RI in Ada County Proposed Zoning TN-R Phasing plan(#of phases) 2 Number of Residential Units(type 164 units(88 in 3-story apartment building and 76 single and of units) duplex style multi-family units) Density Gross density is 9.65 dwelling units to the acre Open Space(acres,total[%]/ Open space is required for the multi-family development per buffer/qualified) the standards in UDC 11-3G-3 and 11-4-3-27—a total of 4.05 345 acres is proposed on the submitte revised concept plan in excess of UDC requirements. Amenities Clubhouse,fitness center,restaurant,open grassy areas(50'x 100'),community gardens,pool,spa, salon,walking trails, sport courts(bocce ball/pickle ball/putting greens),water features and fire pits. Physical Features(waterways, Five Mile Creek bisects the property and is contained within a hazards,flood plain,hillside) 60-foot easement Neighborhood meeting date;#of Three(3)neighborhood meetings were held on various dates attendees: for this project—(33 attendees among the various meetings) History(previous approvals) NA Public Testimony Woodbridge Homeowners Association and 7 others submitted written testimony in support of the proposed project. Page 2 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 204 of 242 Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report Yes,received after the Commission hearing. (yes/no) • Requires ACHD No Commission Action es/no Fire Service • Distance to Fire This fire station is approximately 1.9 miles from the project.If approved,the Station Fire Department can meet the response time goals. • Fire Response This development is 5:00 minutes(under ideal conditions)from the nearest fire Time station—Fire Station 1. • Resource This development is closest to Fire Station#1.Current reliability is 65%from Reliability this station and does not meet the targeted goal of 80%or greater. • Risk This proposed commercial development has a risk factor of 4,in which current Identification resources would not be adequate to supply service to this propose project.Risk factors include firefighting in multi-story buildings and a large gathering of people in a single location. This entails a greater risk for the occupants as well as first responders.Fire,life safety systems and occupant training are critical for this development.Other hazards may be found once the development is completed. • Accessibility This project does not meet all required access,road widths and turnarounds. The shared drives shall have an address sign at each entrance and the roadways shall be maintained 365 days a year for fire,EMS and police responses.The end of the common drives shall be signed"No Parking Fire Lane"per appendix D of the 2015 IFC.The driveway on the southwest corner of the break between phase 1 and 2 is over 150' long.It needs to be shortened,go all the way around the building,or have a turnaround at the end of it. • Special/resource This proposed project will require an aerial device.The closest truck company needs is 5 minutes travel time(under ideal conditions)to the proposed development, and therefore the Fire Department can meet this need in the required timeframe if a truck company is required.This fire station is approximately 1.9 miles from the project. In the event of a hazmat event,there will need to be mutual aid required for the development. In the event of a structure fire an additional truck company will be required.This will require additional time delays as a second truck company is not available in the city. • Water Supply Water supply for this proposed development requires 2500 gallons per minute for two hours. (Approximate—see appendix B of the 2015 International Fire Code)The fire flow requirements may be less if the building is fully sprinklered. • Other Resources See other FD comments in exhibit VIII below. Police Service • Distance to Police 3 miles Station • Police Response The proposed Andorra Senior Living Complex development application is Time approximately 1.5 miles from the Meridian Police Department. The expected response time to this area in an emergency is about 5 minutes. The average response time in the City of Meridian is just under 4 minutes. Page 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 205 of 242 • Calls for Service Between 2/1/2019- 1/31/2020,the Meridian Police Department responded to 1,800 calls for service within a mile of the proposed development. See attached documents for details. Between 2/1/2019- 1/31/2020,the Meridian Police Department responded to 144 crashes within a mile of the proposed development. See attached documents for details. • Accessibility No issues with the proposed access • Specialty/resource No additional resources are needed at this time;the PD already services the needs area Wastewater • Distance to Sewer 0 feet Services • Sewer Shed Five Mile Trunkshed • Estimated Project See application Sewer ERU's • WRRF Declining 13.88 Balance • Project Consistent Yes with WW Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts/Concerns Conceptual engineering has not been provided with this application,and therefore the adequacy of sewer service has not been evaluated at this time. Infrastructure modeling must be completed prior to the approval of this application. Water • Distance to Water 0 feet Services • Pressure Zone 4 • Estimated Project See application Water ERU's • Water Quality None Concerns • Project Consistent Yes with Water Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns Conceptual engineering has not been provided with this application,and therefore the adequacy of water service has not been evaluated at this time. Infrastructure modeling must be completed prior to the approval of this application. Page 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 206 of 242 1 1 1 too I�F�iA I LI All FRAIaKLI14;ISO N. NIN1111■■■■ 4 u - INr r - ,Y r .:'LU LU IN :uu 84 + 84 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 II 1 II ■I ■� 1• I �I n 111�■I� ' � ' Y■ii�•i�li�� III •. ni�� ■II■ rollI■ ■■■■ 1�IIIIII■■■ Room ' I■I■■ 111 " `� ■I■ ■■■■II IIIIII , ■■■■■■■■■■■ � ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■ ■■� r:i,:' ■ ■■ ■■� 'IIIIII nl■. ■il ■u■■ II IIIIII �� I err■•■ pro a.ea: �r;l_ II IIIIII NN Incm-_Gceee MEN— • Craig Taylor 4623 W. 2000 S. Rexburg, ID 83440 Bonnie Robinson 6720 E. Emerald St. Boise, ID 83704 B. Applicant: Sawtooth Development Group, LLC 491 N. Main St., Suite 201 Ketchum, ID 83340 IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper Notification 2/14/2020 3/20/2020 Radius notification mailed to properties within 300 feet 2/11/2020 3/18/2020 Public hearing notice sign posted 2/24/2020 3/25/2020 on site Nextdoor posting 2/11/2020 3/18/2020 V. STAFF ANALYSIS A. ANNEXATION&ZONING The Applicant requests annexation and zoning of 16.99 acres of land with TN-R zoning district consistent with the MU-N(Mixed Use—Neighborhood) and MDR(Medium-density Residential) Future Land Use Map (FLUM)designations in the Comprehensive Plan. A conceptual site plan and building elevations were submitted for the development showing how the property is planned to develop, included in Section VII. Proposed Use: The Applicant proposes to develop the site with an age restricted(55+)multi-family residential development. Independent living units (76 units)are proposed on the west and north side of the site [i.e. multi- family(single family detach and duplex style single-level units on one parcel)] and a 3-story apartment building is proposed in the southeast corner of the site consisting of 88 units. Several commercial components will be integrated with the apartment building, including but not limited to a spa, salon and a restaurant for residents and the public during events. The Allowed Uses Table in UDC Table 11-2D-2 for the TN-R zoning district lists multi-family developments as a principally permitted use subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27. Compliance with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2D-6 for the TN- R district is required,including but not limited to the maximum building height of 40 feet. Page 6 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 208 of 242 Comprehensive Plan(https://www.meridiancity.org/compplan): This property is designated MU-N(Mixed Use—Neighborhood)(approximately 8 acres) and MDR(approximately 9 acres) on the Future Land Use Map. The purpose of MU-N designation is to assign areas where neighborhood-serving uses and dwellings are seamlessly integrated into the urban fabric. The intent is to avoid predominantly single-use developments by incorporating a variety of uses. Land uses in these areas should be primarily residential with supporting non-residential services.Non-residential uses in these areas tend to be smaller scale and provide goods or services that people typically do not travel far for (approximately one mile)and need regularly. Employment opportunities for those living in the neighborhood are encouraged. Connectivity and access between the non-residential and residential land uses is particularly critical in MU-N areas. Tree-lined,narrow streets are encouraged. Developments are also encouraged to be designed according to the conceptual MU- N plan depicted in Figure 3B. The proposed development meets many of the goals of Mixed-use Neighborhood designation. The MDR designation allows for a mix of dwelling types including townhouses, condominiums, and apartments. Residential gross densities should range from eight to twelve dwelling units per acre. These areas are relatively compact within the context of larger neighborhoods and are typically located around or near mixed use commercial or employment areas to provide convenient access to services and jobs for residents. Developments need to incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place and should also incorporate connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways, attractive landscaping and a project identity. The proposed land uses and residential densities are consistent with those desired in MU-N and MDR designated areas. Goals,Objectives, &Action Items: Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this application and apply to the proposed use of this property(staff analysis in italics): 2.01.01M-"Support active-adult or independent senior living development." The proposed development will provide housing options for seniors in close proximity to office, medical and commercial uses developed in the area. 3.02.00—"Maintain, improve, and expand the City's infrastructure to meet existing and growing demands in a timely, orderly, and logical manner." The proposed development is contiguous to the City and urban services can be provided to this development. The applicant will be responsible for the extension of the services to serve the proposed development. 6.01.01H-"Require pedestrian access connectors in all new development to link subdivisions together to promote neighborhood connectivity as part of a community pathway system." Pedestrian internal walkways are proposed throughout the development.A segment of the City's multi-use pathway is also proposed to be extended with the development. 4.05.02C—"Encourage the incorporation of creek corridors as amenities in development design." The submitted concept plan incorporates the creek corridor into the design of the project. 2.02.01 —"Plan for safe,attractive and well maintained neighborhoods that have ample open space and generous amenities that provide varied lifestyle choices." The concept plan as designed depicts 26.6%22.907 common open space. Open space is linked throughout the development with inter-connected walking paths for residents of the community to enjoy. Page 7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 209 of 242 3.02.01 G—"Establish and maintain levels of service for public facilities and services, including water, sewer,police,transportation, schools,fire and parks." The applicant is proposing to development the site with a senior housing project. Public Works has allocated resources to serve the development, but additional modeling is required. Both Police and Fire have provided comments on the application and they have no major concerns with the proposed development. With the development of the site, a pathway segment will be extended to enhance the City pathway network and the southern stub street(E. Wells Circle) will be extended to the west for future connectivity for the area. The proposed demographics of the development should have limited impact on the area schools. Stafffinds that the proposed development should have a minimal impact on the current LOS for public facilities. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in MU-N areas,per the Comprehensive Plan: ➢ "All developments should have a mix land uses." The proposed development contains a mix of uses as required(i.e.personal service, restaurant and residential). ➢ "Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 40%of the development area at densities ranging from 6 to 12 units/acre." The residential uses comprise more than 40%of the development area for a combined gross density of 9.65 units per acre. ➢ "Non-residential buildings should be proportional to and blend in with adjacent residential buildings." The proposed 3-story apartment building and the single family dwelling units have similar design elements and construction materials for an integrated development.Adequate transition is also being provide along the west boundary between the proposed development and the existing residential developments in the form of single story units. The restaurant is also integrated into the design of the apartment building to provide vertical relieffrom the single family units that are proposed to the north. ➢ "Unless a structure contains a mix of both residential and office, or residential and commercial land uses, a maximum building size should be limited to a 20,000 square-foot building footprint." The largest building proposed on the site is the 3-story apartment building which has a building footprint of 30,000 square feet. The commercial component incorporates a spa, salon and an attached 6,000 sq.ft. restaurant. Staff finds that the proposed structure provides a mix of commercial and residential uses to support the required increase in the building footprint. )0- "Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks,plazas, outdoor gathering areas, open space, libraries, and schools that comprise a minimum of 10% of the development area are required. Outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count towards this requirement." The proposed development has multiple gathering spaces (26.60162J.4150,4 that may comply with this requirement. ➢ Where the development proposes public and quasi-public uses to support the development above the minimum 5%,the developer may be eligible for additional residential densities and/or an increase to the maximum building footprint." The applicant is extending a portion of the pathway through the development for public benefit and providing open space in excess of UDC standards. Therefore, staff supports the increase in the building footprint as proposed by the applicant. Page 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 210 of 242 Zoning: Based on the analysis above, Staff is of the opinion the requested annexation with the TN-R zoning district and proposed development is generally consistent with the MU-N and MDR FLUM designation for this site. The proposed annexation area is contiguous to City annexed property and is within the Area of City Impact Boundary. A legal description and exhibit map for the annexation area is included in Section VII.A. The City may require a development agreement(DA)in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. In order to ensure the site develops as proposed with this application, staff recommends a DA as a provision of annexation with the provisions included in Section VIII. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There are several existing structures on this site that are required to be removed prior to development of the each subsequent phase. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The proposed plat and subsequent development is required to comply with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2D-6 for the TN-R district. Access(UDC 11-3A-3): Access to this development is proposed from the adjacent local streets (S.Wells St. and E.Wells Circle)in accord with UDC 11-3A-3. For internal connectivity,the applicant is proposing gated private streets and drive aisles. Further, some of the units are proposed to take access from common driveways. The private street standards strictly prohibit common driveways from private streets unless approved through alternative compliance. All private streets within the proposed development should comply with the standards set forth on UDC 11-3F-4; common driveways shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. The private street application and any subsequent alternative compliance application to these standards should be submitted concurrently with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. Pathways(UDC 11-3A-8): There is an existing 10-foot multi-use pathway stubbed at the west boundary constructed with the adjacent Woodbridge Subdivision. The applicant is proposing to extend this segment of the pathway along a portion of the west boundary; turning east and paralleling the north boundary of the Five Mile Creek. Prior to occupancy of the first structure,the applicant should submit and obtain approval of a pedestrian pathway easement from City Council. Further,the applicant should coordinate with the applicable irrigation district and conform to any requirements of the district. The Parks Department is requiring the applicant extend a sidewalk in the northwest corner for interconnectivity. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-17): The TN-R dimensional standards requires 5-foot wide detached sidewalks to be constructed along all roadways. The submitted concept plan depicts detached sidewalks adjacent to all local and private streets, except for the north/south segment of private street along the west boundary of the 3-story apartment building. This area has an attached sidewalk on the east side of the road and open/covered parking on the west side. Parkways (UDC 11-2 11-3A-1 7): Parkways are required to be constructed and landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3A- 17E. In addition,the TN-R dimensional standards requires the parkways to be a minimum of 8 feet in width. Page 9 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 211 of 242 Landscaping and Qualified Open Space& Site Amenities(UDC 11-3B 11-3G): Because the proposed project is over 5 acres in size,the applicant is required to comply the qualified open space and site amenity standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3 and the open space and amenity standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27 for multi-family developments (see analysis below). Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing constructed on the site is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A- 7. Because this is annexation, fencing details have not been provided with the application. With the submittal of the CZC application,the applicant should provide details of the fencing proposed for the development to ensure it complies with UDC standards. Existing Easements: There is an existing 10-foot wide public,utility,drainage and irrigation(PUDI) easements that run along the interior and exterior boundary of the three platted lots created with the Magic View Amended plat and an existing City of Meridian sewer easement along a portion of the west boundary and parallels the north boundary of 971 Wells Circle property, also located in the un- named ROW being vacated. The concept plan submitted with the application depicts structures that encroach in the PUDI easement areas. Further,with vacating the un-named ACHD right-of- way(ROW),the applicant will have to prepare the necessary easement documents to create a new sewer easement once the ROW is vacated,per Public Works specifications. Prior to the issuance of a CZC application,the applicant should vacate the 10-foot wide PUDI easements and establish a new easement for the existing sewer line located with the un-named ACHD ROW. The portion of the sewer easement along the west boundary could impact the design of the proposed development. Per Public Works standards, sewer easements located outside of the public ROW are typically improved with a 14-foot wide all weather surface to support maintenance equipment. The final design for this area has not been coordinated with Public Works to determine their access needs. The appheant should eeer-dina4e with the Publie Works prior to the City Geaneil to easiffe this afea ea*be used by fesideffts er-r-eleeated as PaA of pr-ejeet approval. The revised concept plan has oriented the units away from the easement which does not impede Public Works access to maintain the existing sewer main. Waterways(UDC 11-31A_-6): The Five Mile crosses the southwest corner of this site and is proposed to remain open as an amenity for the development in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6. Utilities (UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is proposed in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. Street lighting is required to be installed in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. See Section VIII.B below for Public Works comments/conditions. Pressurized Irrigation System (UDC 11-3A-I5): An underground pressurized irrigation(PI) system is required to be provided for each lot within the development as set forth as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. If a PI pump station is required on the developed property, such station shall be on a lot solely dedicated to that pump station and shall be owned by the entity that owns and maintains the PI system as set forth in UDC 11-3B-6E. Storm Drainage(UDC 11-3A-18 : An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed structures on the site as shown in Section VII.F. Page 10 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 212 of 242 All structures are required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. Submittal and approval of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review applications are required prior to submittal of building permit application(s). Right-of-Way Vacation The applicant is proposing to vacate un-named ACHD right-of-way(ROW) created with Instrument#8122009. This roadway is not needed to provide access for the development. Therefore, staff is supportive of vacating the ROW. However-,per-City Code,the City r,,, nei ^ In addition to vacating the un-named ROW,there is an existing cul-de-sac along the south boundary(E. Wells Circle).As part of this development, staff is requiring the extension of the roadway to the west boundary. The extension of the roadway as requested by staff,requires the applicant may be t:espensible to vacate a portion of the Wells Circle ROW and dedicate additional ROW. With the extension of the ROW there is the-potential that AC14D will r-e"ir-es the appheant to tefminate the roadway with a temper-ary tufaar-ound until ;t; ex4en oa f,-the-t the west through the adjaeepA subdivision. The revised concept plan depicts the extension of the roadway and incorporates a temporary turnaround as approved by ACHD. The applicant has also provided the necessary legal description and exhibit map to vacate the additional ROW. This m impaet the design of the plan, speeifieally the loss of units i the landseaping. Staff has een*ymaieated with AC14D staff and they have indieated that they det+4 stippeft the desip as shev.,, by the ^ plieaf*. The applicant should design the project to comply with all ACHD requirements. , the appliea-at should provide a legal deser-iption and exhibit of the pertion of ROW being vaeated prior-to the City Getineil hearing. Per City Code,the City Council is only a recommending body on the vacation request, final approval is subject to ACHD approval. MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT(COMPLIANCE WITH THESE STANDARDS WILL OCCUR AT THE CZC REVIEw.THIS ANALYSIS IS FOR INFORMATIVE PURPOSES ONLY.) Specific Use Standards(UDC 11-4-3): The proposed use is subject to the following standards: (Staffs analysis/comments in italic text) 11-4-3-27: MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT: Multi-family developments with multiple properties shall be considered as one property for the purpose of implementing the standards set forth in this section. A. Purpose: 1. To create multi-family housing that is safe and convenient and that enhances the quality of life of its residents. 2. To create quality buildings and designs for multi-family development that enhance the visual character of the community. 3. To create building and site design in multi-family development that is sensitive to and well integrated with the surrounding neighborhood. 4. To create open space areas that contribute to the aesthetics of the community,provide an attractive setting for buildings, and provide safe,interesting outdoor spaces for residents. B. Site Design: Page 11 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 213 of 242 1. Buildings shall provide a minimum setback of ten feet(10')unless a greater setback is otherwise required by this title and/or title 10 of this Code. Building setbacks shall take into account windows, entrances,porches and patios,and how they impact adjacent properties. The applicant must comply with this standard. 2. All on-site service areas, outdoor storage areas,waste storage, disposal facilities, and transformer and utility vaults shall be located in an area not visible from a public street, or shall be fully screened from view from a public street. The site plan depicts screened trash enclosures; all proposed transformer/utility vaults and other service areas shall comply with this requirement. 3. A minimum of eighty(80)square feet of private,usable open space shall be provided for each unit. This requirement can be satisfied through porches,patios,decks,and/or enclosed yards. Landscaping, entryway and other access ways shall not count toward this requirement. In circumstances where strict adherence to such standard would create inconsistency with the purpose statements of this section,the Director may consider an alternative design proposal through the alternative compliance provisions as set forth in section 11-5B-5 of this title. The elevations submitted this application depicts private patios and balconies.However,floor plans have not been submitted to determine if this requirement has been satisfied. With the CZC submittal, the applicant should demonstrate compliance with this requirement or seek alternative compliance if alternative designs are proposed for the project. 4. For the purposes of this section,vehicular circulation areas,parking areas, and private usable open space shall not be considered common open space. These areas should not be included in the open space calculations submitted with the CZC application. 5. No recreational vehicles, snowmobiles,boats or other personal recreation vehicles shall be stored on the site unless provided for in a separate,designated and screened area. The submitted concept plan does not depict any outdoor storage for recreational vehicles. 6. The parking shall meet the requirements set forth in chapter 3, "Regulations Applying to All Districts", of this title. 7. Developments with twenty(20)units or more shall provide the following: a. A property management office. b. A maintenance storage area. c. A central mailbox location, including provisions for parcel mail,that provide safe pedestrian and/or vehicular access. d. A directory and map of the development at an entrance or convenient location for those entering the development. (Ord. 18-1773,4-24-2018) This development consists of 164 units so these standards do apply. The site plan submitted with the CZC application shall include the items noted above. C. Common Open Space Design Requirements: 1. A minimum area of outdoor common open space shall be provided as follows: a. One hundred fifty(150) square feet for each unit containing five hundred(500) or less square feet of living area. Page 12 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 214 of 242 b. Two hundred fifty(250) square feet for each unit containing more than five hundred (500) square feet and up to one thousand two hundred(1,200) square feet of living area. c. Three hundred fifty(350) square feet for each unit containing more than one thousand two hundred(1,200) square feet of living area. At this time, the square footage of each unit is unknown as this information was not provided with the application. Compliance with this standards will occur during review of the CZC application.As noted above the applicant is proposing approximately 26.6 2-24 percent open space for the site in excess of UDC requirements.As noted below an opens space exhibit must accompany the CZC submittal that demonstrates compliance with this requirement. 2. Common open space shall be not less than four hundred(400) square feet in area,and shall have a minimum length and width dimension of twenty feet(20'). The applicant should provide an open space exhibit with the CZC application demonstrating compliance with the requirement. 3. In phased developments, common open space shall be provided in each phase of the development consistent with the requirements for the size and number of dwelling units. The project is proposed to be developed in two (2)phases as shown on the submitted concept plan. The first phase will commence with the north half of the development and the second phase is completed with the southern half of the project including the three- stoty structure. 4. Unless otherwise approved through the conditional use process,common open space areas shall not be adjacent to collector or arterial streets unless separated from the street by a berm or constructed barrier at least four feet(4)in height,with breaks in the berm or barrier to allow for pedestrian access. (Ord. 09-1394, 3-3-2009, ef£retroactive to 2-4- 2009)NA. The subject property does not front on any collector roadways. D. Site Development Amenities: 1. All multi-family developments shall provide for quality of life, open space and recreation amenities to meet the particular needs of the residents as follows: a. Quality of life: (1) Clubhouse. (2) Fitness facilities. (3) Enclosed bike storage. (4) Public art such as a statue. b. Open space: (1) Open grassy area of at least fifty by one hundred feet(50 x 100')in size. (2) Community garden. (3) Ponds or water features. (4) Plaza. c. Recreation: (1) Pool. Page 13 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 215 of 242 (2) Walking trails. (3) Children's play structures. (4) Sports courts. 2. The number of amenities shall depend on the size of multi-family development as follows: a. For multi-family developments with less than twenty(20)units,two(2)amenities shall be provided from two(2)separate categories. b. For multi-family development between twenty(20) and seventy five (75)units,three (3)amenities shall be provided,with one from each category. c. For multi-family development with seventy five(75)units or more, four(4) amenities shall be provided,with at least one from each category. d. For multi-family developments with more than one hundred(100)units,the decision making body shall require additional amenities commensurate to the size of the proposed development. 3. The decision making body shall be authorized to consider other improvements in addition to those provided under this subsection D,provided that these improvements provide a similar level of amenity. (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) Based on the 164 proposed units, the Commission has the authority to determine the appropriate amount of amenities for the proposed development. On the concept plan, the applicant has provided a list amenities proposed for the development as follows: clubhouse,fitness facility, restaurant, spa, salon, walking trails,pool, open grassy areas, community gardens and various sport courts. Although, some of these amenities are conceptual at this time, stafffinds the proposed amenity package for the development is commensurate to the size of the proposed development. E. Landscaping Requirements: 1. Development shall meet the minimum landscaping requirements in accord with chapter 3, "Regulations Applying to All Districts", of this title. 2. All street facing elevations shall have landscaping along their foundation. The foundation landscaping shall meet the following minimum standards: a. The landscaped area shall be at least three feet(3')wide. b. For every three(3)linear feet of foundation,an evergreen shrub having a minimum mature height of twenty four inches(24")shall be planted. c. Ground cover plants shall be planted in the remainder of the landscaped area. The landscape plan submitted with the CZC application shall be revised to comply with these requirements. F. Maintenance and Ownership Responsibilities: All multi-family developments shall record legally binding documents that state the maintenance and ownership responsibilities for the management of the development, including,but not limited to, structures,parking, common areas, and other development features. The applicant must comply with this requirement. This document must be provided at the time of CZC submittal. Page 14 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 216 of 242 Parking(UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided for multi-family dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit[Multi-family: 1-bedroom requires 1.5 per unit with at least 1 in a covered carport or garage, 2-3 bedroom units require 2 per unit with at least 1 in an a covered carport or garage], as set forth in UDC Table 11-3C-6. The non-residential uses(clubhouse and restaurant) is based the traditional neighborhood district standards of 1 space for every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. The applicant has provided a parking ratio for the overall development. For the single family detached and duplex units,the applicant is proposing to apply the single family parking standards of a single car garage and a parking pad for the 1 and 2 bedroom units(total parking: 148; the apartment complex is based on the nursing care standards of 0.5 stalls per bed(total parking: 10024—5066 covered; 506-uncovered)and the commercial standards are not identified. However,the concept plan does depict a total of 26-2-guest parking spaces€ff dispersed throughout the development. Based on the UDC standards,the proposed parking is to meet the standards described above. If this was a typical development the applicant would need to provide the following parking requirements: non-residential uses— 13 parking spaces and the multi-family—296 parking stalls with half them required to be covered. The concept plan as proposed does not meet the current parking standards of the UDC (deficient 354-7 parking stalls). Since this a 55+community, staff is of the opinion that the parking ratio depicted on the submitted concept plan is sufficient for this type of development. However,the parking plan proposed with this development must be approved through alternative compliance. If the applicant's must either comply with the City's parking standards or obtain approval of an alternative compliance application. This application must be submitted concurrently with the CZC application. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Annexation and Vacation with the requirement of a Development Agreement per the provisions and comments included in Section VIII in accord with the Findings in Section IX. B. The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission heard this item on March 5,2020. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ and VAC request. I. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Clay Sammis and Jeremy Garner b. In opposition:None c. Commenting: Monica McKinley,Pat Rennison and Barbara Valdez d. Written testimony: Woodbridge HOA,Alan and Carol Jax,Barbara Valdez,Bob and Lindy Neufeld,Dennis Bailey,Pat Rennision and Cass e. Staff presenting application: Bill Parsons f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s) testimony a. Extension of E.Wells Circle. b. Public hearing notification. c. Impacts to Locust View Heights Subdivision. 3. Ke, ids)of discussion by Commission: a. Amount of open space and amenities proposed for the development. b. Square footage of the balconies proposed for the 3-story apartment complex. c. No units having direct access to E. Wells Circle. Page 15 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 217 of 242 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. No units shall take direct access from E. Wells Circle (Concept plan has been updated to reflect this change). IL. Applicant shall provide a minimum of 6 to 8 amenities, including a clubhouse,walking trails and fitness facility with the remainder coordinated with staff. 5. Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: a. None Page 16 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 218 of 242 VII. EXHIBITS A. Annexation Legal Description and Exhibit Map REVISED ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION FOR 715 & 955 S.WELLS ST. &917 E. WELLSCIR. Lots 20, 21 and 22 of Amended Plat of Magic View Subdivision as filed In Book 52 of Plats at Pages 4445 and 4446, records of Ada County, Idaho located in the SW 114 of the NE 114 and NW 114 of the SE 114 the of Section 17. T 3N., R.1 E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows. BEGINNING at the SW corner of said Lot 22,said point also being the C114 Corner of said Section 17; thence along the West boundary line of said Lot 22 North OO°22'59" East,636.00 feet to the NW corner of said Lot 22 thence along the northeasterly boundary line of said Lot 22 and the southeasterly extension thereof South 72°05'47"East, 837.74 feet to a paint on the centerline of$-Wells St.; thence along the centerline of S.Wells St the following 3 courses and distances: thence South 18°48'1T'West, 392.23 feet; thence 61.25 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 132.64 feet; a central angle of 28°24'59"and a long chord which bears South 03°35'43"West, 60.71 feet; thence South 09'3646"East, 793.56 feet, thence along the centerline of E. Wells Cir North 89°1E'2B,,West,428.35 feet; thence leaving said centerline South 40°43'32"West, 25.00 feet to a point on the North boundary line of Wyndstone place Subdivision as filed in Book 96 of Plats at Pages 12,047 and 12,048,records of Ada County, Idaho; thence along said North boundary line North 89'18'28"West, 203.17 feet to the SVV Corner of said Lot 20; thence along said West boundary line of said Lot 20 North 00`23'09" East,795.56 feet to the POINT Of BEGINNING- Contains 16.99 acres,more or less. zi a y7729 G.G Page 17 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 219 of 242 mw COMER CURVET E q« 7 CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CHORD DIST. CHORD DRG. DELTA 3 e } m !,32 R 61.2.5 E50-2 S.31V 43"■ �5�2« w § k 7 ~ ® LINE TABLE k e. \ | � LINE LENGTH BEARING § | -�6 a, z 25& SO4l,£w �.�. \ j r / Z \ � & ( i m CID j E . POINT DF BEGINNING / | c ------7------------4 q . . � � are � \� | _ ;m 4E m 200 ec SCALE ]" = 200' / a| § \ A,901 | z \ X� F Ns ' \ 7 729 OF H9,r 2n w _35-— x E O z=1f E AES OE \ IDAHO ANNE ATON EXHIBIT DRAWING FOROMWIMEPAILOST SURVEY __. s a g55 S. JS ST. g« E. L s Cm NO. +_w,�_IA_ - � GROUP, LLC �2 OF_ma,�_17 ±_ �. * __wry._O Page !a — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April w,ym- Page 2ya&2 m y . ti'x 7 N� d A -L 7729 aza.as O+ Y G.CA a03.t7 1101 B'29'4r Lots 20-22, Amerided Magic View Sub Annex. Closure Sheet 1.72020 Scale: 1 inert=200 feet File: Traci 1:16.s852 acres,Closure;n05,20i144.01 R.(lTM9270),rerlmster=3973 il- 41 n00.2259e&96 08n84.1828w203,17 02 s72.0547e 637.74 09 nq0-2309e Ns.56 03 s i5.4813w 392.23 04 Lt.r=132.B4,dekta-026.2d5%char&s03.3543w607t 05 s09.3546e 793,56 06 n99.16280 42&36 97 s04.4332w 25 Page 19 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020- Page 221 of 242 B. REVISED Right-of-Way Legal Descriptions and Exhibit Maps EXHIBIT" " ACHD RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION 715&955 S.WELLS ST. An un-named street located adjacent to Lots 20, 21 and 22 of Amended Plat of Magic View Subdivision as filed in Bcok 52 of Plats at Pages 4445 and 4446, records of Ada County, Idaho located in the NW 1!4 of the 5E 114 the of Section 1, T,31V., RAE„ B.M., Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows Conn mancing at the SW comer of said Lot 22, said point also being the C114 corner of said Section 1; thence aJang the South boundary line of said Lot 22 South 89°6609"East, 178.16 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING-, thence continuing along said South boundary line South 89`56'09"East, 290.61 feel to a point on the westerly right-of-way line of S_Wells St. thence along said westerly right-of-way line South 09°36'46"East.50-72 feat; thence leaving said westerly right-of-way line North 89°56'08"West, 224.25 feet; thence 44.15 feel along the arc of a non-tangent curve to tha left,said curve having a radius of 45.00 feet, a central angle of 58'15'04"and a long chord which bears South 61'56'19" West, 42.43 feL-t to a point of reverse Curve. thence 185.50 feet along the arc of said reverse curve to the right, said reverse curve having a radius pf 45-DO feet, a renlral angle of 216'11'02"and a long chord which bears#forth 28°05'42"West, 79.40 feet to tie REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains 19.418 square feet, more or less. GE N 5 0'�.� CL 7729 .,�, '12PJ.f 10 Page 20 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 222 of 242 m m! / r CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENCTH CHORD DST NORD BRG. DEL7A / @ 45.00 44.18 42 s ,� 'a rw 5FW04" 2 a£ ,�S 7@ 2� 3■ ae,'' / 2/ *� 2� ® 2# rINT 2/ 2yOF BEGINNING , 2« ms 2msB'7 mmef / $ @ . DST « \ 19.41E mf � 'f | r Nm'56 22 \f $ � � I | � • Ar � � jCNV LA Ns�� EL 7729 Q/ ) C, e < ,m C] a k 2, SCALE: 1 = SO' IDAHO EXHIBIT DRAWING FOR +/ SURVEY " ACHD STREET VACATION ,» _�n � GROUP. LLC �TM®m-a�—�mDP DATE ��; T.L.��7_, ,m_ Page 21 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April w,mm- Page 223y&2 00,5 0L,e i M 22t.1`, � 4 ro � C RS�C�` G 7729 xl OF 5 � Bight-of-Way Vacation Description Closure Sheet 1W912019 Scale' I inch= 50 feet Fife' tract 1-0.4d5B Atma�ig41g Scj.Kest},Cioawa:n00.0000e 0.00 R.;11508UrT R7oti0,795 ft. 01 a99.5609e 290.61 02 m09.W469 50.72 03 09.56Ww 724.25 04 U.r-5,04,dvlka`056.1504,chard=a61,5$19w 42.48 05 Rt,r45.00,dahe=2a6.1102,chord=n28,0542w 79 40 Page 22 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 224 of 242 EXHIBIT " AC HD PARTtAL RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION E.WELLS CIRCLE A portion of E Welts Circle as shown on the Am end ec Flat of Magir-View SubdiMsbn as filed in Boots 52 of Plats at Pages 4445 and 4446. records of Ada County, Idaho located in the NV4 114 of the 5E 114 the of Section 1, T-3N.. R.1 E„ B.0 ,Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the SW corner of Lot 2D of Said Amended Plat of Magic View Subdivision from which the C114 corner of s lid Section 1 bears Forth 00`23'09"East, 795 56 feet; lhence along the Sowh IDaundary hne of said Lot 20 South 89°18'28" East, 203.17 feet to a paint on the right-of-way line of E. Wells Circle; thence along the right-of-way line of E.Wells Cirela the following 3 courses and distances: thence 75.70 fleet along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 45 00 fiaet,a central angle of 96'22'46"and a long chord wh a bears rs North 41°05'05" West, 67.08 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence 109.85 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 45-00 feet,a central angle of 139'52'18"and a long chard whictt bears North 77'02'27"East. 84.54 feet to a point of reverse curare; thersce 44.18 feet along the arc of said revarse curua to the left, said reverse curve having a radius of 45-04 feet, a central angle of 56"IE04"and a long &ord which bears South 61'N'56"East. 42.43 feed; thence leaving said right-of-way line North 890 16'29'West, 119.55 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains 2:863 square feet, more or less, SIN S 77 1 � Page 23 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 225 of 242 C1/4 AMENDED jVAGIC VIEW SUBDIVISION g mLdI Es r � REAL POINT OF BECINKNC - + NB9r1$26"41 119.55' r r r E. WELLS CIR. S11' CORNER C'r - - - - - - -~ - LOT 20 S89'1 fi'28'E 203,17' fFYAVp�70NE PLACP SUPDfVfSION dv CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CHORD DIST, CHORD 8RG. DELTA C1 45.00 75.70 B7.Q8 441rQ5'05"W O 22'4G' C2 45.00 109.55 6 ,5# N7TU2'27'E C3 45.W 44.18 42-43 561178'56'E 5E'75'447 5 20 907729 +'} O 77 0 14 44 12C j -„ p SCALE: 1" = 40' JOB Nq- IDAHO EXHISIY " " DRAWING FOR 14mSi7 SURVEY f*OE. �� E. WELLS CIRCLE PARTIAL VACATION 9Q9E.i�d urai GROUP {211�61FPFTP , LLB LOCATED Ih TK,KW a aF TME Z 1/4 0 DY& PATE i.E�C'IIoH I. T-7 4..klcL 4r AI>A a*-f. I'}}a 3ADI H Page 24 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020- Page 226 of 242 C. REVISED Conceptual Site Plan(date: 02i20 03/18/2020) 71 5 S WELLS STREET L 971 E WELLS CIRCLE 7155 WELLS - STREET °TU. e �, 9S99 WE1134i °_�••�••�. { .�b. WR11ENSLI7 SF" aims SMEFF 971 EWELS - CIRCLE -- - 4'_-- o OPEN SPACE z a 0 AD Page 25 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 227 of 242 D. Conceptual Elevations (date: 2/20/2020) ® 0 8P ® _ ' 0 ® 90 0�� 00 m 00 0 80 m nooRxn sFxion uvcxG Ep TELEVATION _ .. ® ® m � ® m 88 88 8 ® W DAIIOn Page 26 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 228 of 242 0 �iN �, III ii I �.i IG goo , ifl��Il dJj I '' Page 27 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 229 of 242 t=-- - o ® MI��NRIMdIRF1L pop F-07 C - 0 j — M003 IV MouvLIX Page 28 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 230 of 242 ❑ E0.5T WTION SM E FAMILY F MIG-CF1fI1RT'SINGLE FAMILY L7�iWF,: Page 29 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 231 of 242 VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION A Development Agreement(DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance,a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption,and the developer. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum,incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the conceptual site plan, conceptual building elevations and phasing plan in Section VII and the provisions contained herein. b. All structures shall comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual and the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19. An application for Design Review shall be submitted concurrently with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application and approved prior to submittal of building permit applications. c. The applicant shall comply with the multi-family specific use standards set forth in UDC 11-4-3-27. d. Applicant shall comply with the TN-R dimensional standards set forth in UDC Table I I- 2D-6. e. The applicant shall submit alternative compliance application concurrent with a CZC application to deviate from the following standards: 1. Private Street Standards(11-3F-4) 2. Parking requirements(11-3C-6) 3. Multi-family private usable open space standards(11-4-3-27B3) £ Applicant shall construct a segment of the City's 10-foot multi-use pathway through the development as proposed. Prior to occupancy of the first structure,the applicant shall obtain City Council's approval of a public pedestrian easement and record said document. The applicant shall also extend the 5-foot wide detached sidewalk in the northwest corner to the north boundary for interconnectivity. g. Applicant shall comply with all ACHD conditions of approval. h. , use of the 20 foot wide easemen4 area on a poi4ion of the west boundar-y. if a substantia4 ehange is required by Publie Wefks,the appheai#shall modify the proposed eefleept p! prier-to City Gotmeil meeting. i. Prior to submitting a CZC application,the applicant shall vacate the 10-foot wide PUDI easements created by Amended Magic View Subdivision OR modify the site plan submitted with the CZC application to remove structures from encroaching in the platted easements. j. Applicant shall comply with the open space and site amenity standards set forth in UDC I I-3G and UDC 11-4-3-27. The applicant shall submit an open space exhibit and provide Page 30 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 232 of 242 details of the six(6)to eight(8)proposed amenities with their CZC application demonstrating compliance with these standards. The amenities proposed for the development shall include a clubhouse, fitness facility,walking trails and open grassy areas as depicted on the concept plan. The remainder of the amenities shall be coordinated with staff. k. Applicant shall extend E. Wells Circle to west boundary for future extension. if�D shall provide a legal deser-iption and exhibit map of the ROW being Vaea4ed prior-to the B. PUBLIC WORKS Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 Coneeptual engineering has not been PFOvided with this appReation,and theFefor-e the adequney Of WftteF and SeWeF seFViees have not been evaluated at this time. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 2.3 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. 2.4 Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff,the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 2.5 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond.Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.6 In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life,non-safety and non- health improvements,prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 2.7 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. Page 31 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 233 of 242 2.8 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.9 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.10 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.11 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 2.12 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.13 The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.14 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.15 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.19 Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting(http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval,which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 2.20 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via a plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x I V map with bearings and distances(marked EXHIBIT B)for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 2.21 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 2.22 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at(208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be Page 32 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 234 of 242 used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 2.23 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 2.24 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year- round source of water(MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 2.25 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals,or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridianciiy.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=182552&dbid=0&repo=Meridian City D. POLICE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?ld=l 83075&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity E. BOISE PROJECT BOARD OF CONTROL https://weblink.meridiancioy.org/WebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=182568&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity F. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT(NMID) https://weblink.meridiancity.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=183062&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity G. ADA COUNTY https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=182621&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity H. COMPASS https://weblink.meridiancit E.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=182953&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity_ I. PARKS DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancity.orglWebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=183392&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity J. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https://weblink.meridiancity.Org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=184614&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianCitX IX. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: Page 33 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 235 of 242 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Commission finds that the Applicant's request to annex and develop the subject 16.99 acre property with TN-R zoning is consistent with the associated MU-N and MDR FLUM designations for this property. (See section V above for more information) 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment and development complies with the purpose statements of the traditional neighborhood districts in that it will provide for a range of housing needs for the community consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare as the proposed residential and commercial uses should be compatible with adjacent existing and future residential and commercial uses in the area. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The Commission finds City services are available to be provided to this development. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The Commission finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City. Page 34 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 236 of 242 E IDIAN --- IDAHO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Agenda Item Number: 7 Item Title: Meeting Notes: (�E IDI y ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item - 7.A. Presenter: Chris Johnson Estimated Time for Presentation: 2 minutes Title of Item - Ordinance No. 20-1878: An Ordinance (H-2019-0109 — Edington Commons)for Annexation of a Parcel of Land Being a Portion of the W'/2 SW'/4 SW'/4 of Section 36 Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,Ada County, Idaho, as Described in Attachment "A" and Annexing Certain Lands and Territory, Situated in Ada County, Idaho, and Adjacent and Contiguous to the Corporate Limits of the City of Meridian as Requested by the City of Meridian; Establishing and Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification of 14.564 Acres of Land From RUT to R-15 (Medium High Density Residential) Zoning District in the Meridian City Code; Providing That Copies of This Ordinance Shall be Filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as Required by Law; and Providing for a Summary of the Ordinance; and Providing for a Waiver of the Reading Rules; and Providing an Effective Date Edington Commons annexation ordinance Council Notes: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Upload Date Edington Commons Annexation Ordinance Ordinance 4/9/2020 Edington Commons exhibts A and B Exhibit 4/9/2020 REVIEWERS: Department Reviewer Action Date Legal. Weatherly, Adrienne Approved 4/9/2020 - 1:45 PM Legal. Albertson, Michelle Approved 4/9/2020 - 1:47 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 237 of 242 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-044131 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=4 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 04/16/2020 11:12 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 20-1878 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT,BORTON, CAVENER, HOAGLUN, PERREAULT, STRADER AN ORDINANCE(H-2019-0109—EDINGTON COMMONS)FOR ANNEXATION OF A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE W V2 SW '/4 SW '/4 OF SECTION 36 TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH,RANGE 1.WEST,BOISE MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY,IDAHO,AS DESCRIBED IN ATTACHMENT "A" AND ANNEXING CERTAIN LANDS AND TERRITORY, SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF MERIDIAN;ESTABLISHING AND DETERMINING THE LAND USE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 14.564 ACRES OF LAND FROM RUT TO R-15 (MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT IN THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION,AS REQUIRED BY LAW;AND PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. That the following described land as evidenced by attached Legal Description herein incorporated by reference as Exhibit "A" are within the corporate limits of the City of Meridian,Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for annexation and re- zoning by the owner of said property,to-wit:Lester and Betty Vogel Trust. SECTION 2. That the above-described real property is hereby annexed and re-zoned from RUT to R-15 (Medium High Density Residential)Zoning District in the Meridian City Code. SECTION 3. That the City has authority pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho,and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and zone said property. SECTION 4. That the City has complied with all the noticing requirements pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and re-zone said property. SECTION 5. That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps,and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 6. All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed,rescinded and annulled. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall be in frill force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—Edington Commons(H 2O19-0109) Page 1 of 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 238 of 242 SECTION 8. The Clerk of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a map prepared in a draftsman manner, including the lands herein rezoned,with the following officials of the County of Ada, State of Idaho, to-wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho. SECTION 9. That pursuant to the affirmative vote of one-half(1/2) plus one (1) of the Members of the full Council,the rule requiring two(2)separate readings by title and one(1)reading in full be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval and publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 14th day of April , 2020. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 14th day of April , 2020. MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON, CITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) ss: County of Ada ) On this 14thday of April ,2019,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared ROBERT E.SIMISON and CHRIS JOHNSON known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk,respectively,of the City of Meridian,Idaho,and who executed the within instrument,and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO RESIDING AT: Meridian, Idaho MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 3-28-2022 CERTIFICATION OF SUMMARY: ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—Edington Commons(H 2O19-0109) Page 2 of 3 EXHIBIT A Annexation &Zoning Legal Description and Exhibit Map Sawtooth Land Surveying, LLC �p f` 2080 5,'Na51:Fssglan Ave, 1£l ll Nori€3wesL ES1vd.,Ste.G €41 €i9 Avenue Vx t 1!/ Emmctt,10 63G 17 Caevr d'Alar IU t538 i 4 .lemmr„IU 63336 F:(208)396-81 pit F=(206)714.45,14 F:(205)329.5303 -ct� 'r,uLyfi f Cr F:(208)395.8105 f_(203)292-4-153 I°:(208)324-5821 Annexation Legal Description A parcel of[and being a portion of the W112 SW1/4 SW1/4 of Section 36,Township 4 North, Mange 1 West of the Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the S1/16 corner common to Sections 35 and 36, from which the southwest corner of said Section 36,beats South 00014'51"West, 1318.78 feet distant; Thence South 88056'15"East, coincident with the north line of the SW1/4 SW1/4 of said Section 36, a distance of 272.69 feet; Thence South 71"02'05"East, 415.82 feet to the east line of the W1/2 SWI/4 SW1/4 of said Section 36; Thence South 00°17'40"West,coincident with said east line, 863.19 feet to the southeast corner of the N1/2 SW1/4 SWi/4 SW1/4 of said Section 36; Thence North 88046'08"West, coincident with the south line of said N1/2 SWi/4 SW1/4 SW1/4 of Section 36, a distance of 665,89 feet to the west line of said 5W1/4 SWIJ4 of said Section 36; Thence North 00114'51"East, coincident with said west line, 989.08 feet to the Point of BEGINNING. The above described parcel contains 14.564 acres, more or less. BASIS Of BEARING for this description is South 0011.4'51"West, between the S1/16 corner common to Sections 35 and 36 and the southwest corner of Section 36,Township 4 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian. NL LA R_ 561 �r OF All P:t2019119161-EOINCTON PLACE ALTA-CMaSurveyiDrawings\Descriptions\19161-Annexation Legal.docx.dorx Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 241 of 242 EXHIBIT B ANNEXAT70N LEGAL EXHIBIT POW OF®FGININW 51116 CORNER SEClION535&3& S8B°56']5"E Z71.6�J' ..w r t j r� "r ±14.564 ACRES r fill I r r r t tkL LA i S,- ►N CORNER � 35 35 �52g]p m,�BixZli q�p r� � � , `1 W.usnexRa 1"=200' PROJECR 06 AVIDEVELOPER: 2030 S. WASNIiVG70NAVE. A'1:fG 19161-EX CG EMMETT,10 63617 EDiNGTON PLACE 4624 WFAIRVIEWAVF. F: 208 396-6104 PROlEcro SUBDtVfSION BOISE,ICD03706 �, F.�2l38�398-8105 19161 SW114 SW114 0E SECTION 36 (206)33G 5355 SHEEr T.4 N.,R. 1 W.B.M. 812212019 f v��uvcyr`rz� WWW.SAWTOOTHLS.COM 1 OF I_ Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda April 14,2020— Page 242 of 242 i I 9{ 3 William L.M.Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that the i summary below is true and complete and upon its publication will provide adequate notice to the public. e R i I r . i liam L. WINary, City Attorney i SUMMARY OF CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 0,) 79 An ordinance(H-2019-0109 Edington Commons)for annexation of a parcel of land as defined in the map published herewith; establishing and determining the land use zoning classification from RUT zoning district to R-15(medium high density residential)zoning district;providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor,the Ada County Recorder,and the Idaho State Tax Commission,as required by law;and providing an effective date. A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall,City of Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue,Meridian,Idaho. This ordinance shall be effective as of the date of publication of this summary. [Publication to include map as set forth in Exhibit B.] ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—Edington Commons(H 2O19-0109) Page 3 of 3 E IDIAN --- IDAHO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Agenda Item Number: 8 Item Title: Meeting Notes: