Loading...
2020-03-10 Work Session CITY COUNCIL WORK C� E IDIAN:-. SESSION MINUTES City Council Chambers 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 4:30 PM 1. Roll-Call Attendance X Liz Strader (4:35pm) X Joe Borton X Brad Hoaglun X Treg Bernt X Jessica Perreault X Luke Cavener Mayor Robert E.Simison 2. Adoption of Agenda - Adopted Item 3: Consent Agenda [Action Item] — Approved A. Approve Minutes of February 25, 2020 City Council Work Session B. Approve Minutes of February 25, 2020 City Council Regular Meeting C. Approve Minutes of March 3, 2020 City Council Work Session D. Burlingame Subdivision No. 1 Pedestrian Pathway Easement No. 1 E. Burlingame Subdivision No. 1 Pedestrian Pathway Easement No. 2 F. Caven Ridge Estates West Subdivision No. 2 Pedestrian Pathway Easement G. Turf Farm Subdivision No. 1 Pedestrian Pathway Easement H. Final Order for Caldera Canyon (H-2019-0147) by Vanessa Klaus, Located at 1294 E. Leigh Field Dr. I. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Edington Commons (H-2019-0109) by G20, LLC, Located at 3610 N. Linder Rd. J. Development Agreement (H-2019-0120) Hensley Station with Northern Land Holdings, LLC fka Northern Land Development, LLC, Located at 462 N. Black Cat Rd. K. Temporary License Agreement between the Ada County Highway District and the City of Meridian Regarding the Pine Avenue Trailhead Amenity L. License Agreement Between the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District and the City of Meridian Regarding Caven Ridge Estates West No. 2 Subdivision to Support/Accompany ESMT 2020-0020 and 2019-0117 M. Resolution 20-2190: A Resolution Of The Mayor And The City Council Of The City Of Meridian, Waiving A Portion Of Certain City Of Meridian Permitting Fees For The Meridian Library District's Tenant Improvement Application To Construct The Unbound Library Branch At 722 E 2nd Street In Meridian; And Providing An Effective Date N. AP Invoices for Payment - 02/28/20 - $134,257.95 O. AP Invoices for Payment - 03/04/20 - $177,621.79 Special P. AP Invoices for Payment - 03/11/20 - $827,974.28 Q. AP Invoices for Payment - 03/05/20 - $76.00 Item 4: Department / Commission Reports [Action Item] A. Mayor's Office: Update on Current Citywide Strategic Plan B. Consideration of Approval of the Union Urban Renewal District Eligibility Report and Corresponding Resolution (No. 20-2188) C. Resolution No. 20-2188: A Resolution Of The Mayor And The City Council Of The City Of Meridian Accepting That Certain Report On Eligibility For The Union District Area As An Urban Renewal Area And Revenue Allocation Area And Justification For Designating The Area As Appropriate For An Urban Renewal Project; Determining That The Area Identified In The Report Is Deteriorated Or Deteriorating; Designating Such Area As Appropriate For An Urban Renewal Project; Directing The Urban Renewal Agency To Prepare An Urban Renewal Plan For The Area To Include A Revenue Allocation Provision As Allowed By Law; Directing The Urban Renewal Agency To Prepare A Plan Amendment To The Downtown District Plan To Deannex The Union District Area; And Providing An Effective Date — Approved (Borton Abstain) D. Community Development: 2020 Roadway, Intersection and Community Program Priorities E. City Council: Discussion Regarding Council Members Designated to Serve as Contact for City Areas F. Resolution No. 20-2189: A Resolution Approving City Council President's Appointments of City Council Members to Serve as Contact for Respective City Areas - Continued Meeting Adjourned at 5:47 pm Meridian City Council Work Session March 10, 2020. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 4:30 p.m., Tuesday, March 10, 2020, by President Treg Bernt. Members Present: Joe Borton, Luke Cavener, Treg Bernt, Jessica Perreault, Brad Hoaglun and Liz Strader. Members Absent: Robert Simison. Also present: Chris Johnson, Bill Nary, Cameron Arial, Caleb Hood, Warren Stewart, Jeff Brown, Charlie Butterfield, Vincent Koontz and Dean Willis. Item 1: Roll-call Attendance: _X_ Liz Strader (4:35pm) _X_ Joe Borton _X_ Brad Hoaglun _X_Treg Bernt X Jessica Perreault _X Luke Cavener Mayor Robert E. Simison Bernt: Welcome, everybody, to our work session this evening. For the record today is Tuesday, March 10th. It is 4:30 p.m. We will start with roll call attendance, Mr. Clerk. Item 2: Adoption of Agenda Bernt: Mayor Simison. We love him. Travel safe. Item 2, adoption of the agenda. Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor. We do not have any changes on our agenda in looking through it, so, I move adoption of the agenda as printed. Borton: Second. Bernt: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda. All those in favor say aye. Any nay? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 3: Consent Agenda [Action Item] A. Approve Minutes of February 25, 2020 City Council Work Session B. Approve Minutes of February 25, 2020 City Council Regular Meeting C. Approve Minutes of March 3, 2020 City Council Work Session Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 5 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 2 of 26 D. Burlingame Subdivision No. 1 Pedestrian Pathway Easement No. 1 E. Burlingame Subdivision No. 1 Pedestrian Pathway Easement No. 2 F. Caven Ridge Estates West Subdivision No. 2 Pedestrian Pathway Easement G. Turf Farm Subdivision No. 1 Pedestrian Pathway Easement H. Final Order for Caldera Canyon (H-2019-0147) by Vanessa Klaus, Located at 1294 E. Leigh Field Dr. I. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Edington Commons H-2019-0109) by G20, LLC, Located at 3610 N. Linder Rd. J. Development Agreement (H-2019-0120) Hensley Station with Northern Land Holdings, LLC fka Northern Land Development, LLC, Located at 462 N. Black Cat Rd. K. Temporary License Agreement between the Ada County Highway District and the City of Meridian Regarding the Pine Avenue Trailhead Amenity L. License Agreement Between the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District and the City of Meridian Regarding Caven Ridge Estates West No. 2 Subdivision to Support/Accompany ESMT 2020-0020 and 2019-0117 M. Resolution 20-2190: A Resolution Of The Mayor And The City Council Of The City Of Meridian, Waiving A Portion Of Certain City Of Meridian Permitting Fees For The Meridian Library District's Tenant Improvement Application To Construct The Unbound Library Branch At 722 E 2nd Street In Meridian; And Providing An Effective Date N. AP Invoices for Payment - 02/28/20 - $134,257.95 O. AP Invoices for Payment - 03/04/20 - $177,621.79 Special P. AP Invoices for Payment - 03/11/20 - $827,974.28 Q. AP Invoices for Payment - 03/05/20 - $76.00 Bernt: Number three -- Item No. 3, the Consent Agenda. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 6 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 3 of 26 Hoaglun: Mr. Mayor. The Consent Agenda, there were no changes, so I move approval of the Consent Agenda and with the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest. Borton: Second. Bernt: I have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. No discussion, we will have -- those in favor say aye. Any opposed? No. Motion carries. Perfect. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 4: Department/Commission Reports [Action Item] A. Mayor's Office: Update on Current Citywide Strategic Plan Bernt: Item No. 4, move to Department/Commission Reports, starting with 4-A with the Mayor's office, update on the current citywide strategic plan and I believe that Mr. Vincent is going to present. Koontz: All right. Mr. Council President, Members of Council, I was told to keep this two minutes, so -- so I'm Vince and I'm here to provide Council a brief two minute update -- I'm joking -- from our 2016 to 2020 strategic plan. I'm happy to report that our strategic plan is on track and we are making steady progress on our objectives and we have got 59 total and we are -- we are moving forward on that. As a note, Mark Niemeyer will not be here tonight to present his closeout slide. He is at some sort of virus meeting. I don't know what that's about, so -- but he won't be here tonight. He did say he will provide a memo to Council on his closeout. So, just an update on that. So, I'm going to be talking about bi-annually we do a review to Council on our current plan. We provide closeout reports and update on high priority strategic objectives that are currently in progress. Today I will report to you our completion -- our current completion status on our objectives on our total plan. Our objective leads will come up and present to you their close outs that have occurred since our last September update in 2019. And, finally, I will discuss what's left in our current plan in the last nine months and what we are going to be -- and what we are going to be completed -- completing and potentially adopting into our next strategic plan. So, how are we doing? Our current plan completion, which is the total number of tactics in the plan, we stand at 73 percent complete. We were at -- when I last reported when -- when Mayor Tammy last reported we were at 67 percent complete and our goal is to be over 80 percent complete by the end of the plan period at the end of the year. So, we are definitely on track with that. Our objective completion -- we have completed 27 out of the 59 total objectives of the plan. Quite a few of those objectives have about one tactic remaining. That's one of the reasons there is a little discrepancy between the plan completion at 73 percent and the 46 objective completion status. So, we have got seven objectives between 79 and 99 percent complete and we have got a few more that are almost over 50 percent complete. So, we should have a significant amount of objectives completed by the end of the plan. Our goal is to be over 70 percent complete on the objectives by the end of the plan, so we are well on track to do that. As part of the new plan, as I mentioned, we may carry over some of the strategic objectives Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 7 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 4 of 26 and goals into the new plan that we are creating based on the feedback, but we will -- we will see where that gets to with our current plan completion and with our communication with --with our directors and with our partners and our community on strategic plan, there are very well many things that may carry over into that next plan. With -- with that we have got a few close outs. We have got seven total and I'm going to have the objective leads give a brief discussion on what they have completed, what challenges that they have had, and what's coming up next in those strategic objectives. So, I'm going to hand it off to Caleb for a few minutes and he is going to talk about his complete objectives under strategic growth. Hood: Mr. President, Members of Council, moving that needle that Vince had on that previous slide I think was largely due to the adoption of the new comp plan since September, so I will kind of walk you through -- a lot of what I'm going to close out with you here are directly tied to the Comprehensive Plan and there is a couple of more that he even alluded to where we have made substantial progress, but we can't quite close them out yet, because we haven't totally closed the loop on -- on some of those things. So, we are actively working on those and more to come here in the coming months. But the ones we are closing out -- 1.D.1, define and articulate the city's growth goals. So, one of the major milestones, obviously, was the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in December. That was a two year process. Some of the tactics and performance measures that are within that objective included hiring a consultant with experience. So, Logan Simpson. Two years we worked with Logan Simpson to get us to adopt that plan. So, those three performance measures within that objective are, again, hire a consultant with experience and implement the plan is the third performance measure. You will see a theme here with the three I'm closing out. You get -- you get to the end and you are not done. You get to the end and it's about implementation or updating and keeping it going. So, we are closing them out, but they are -- we are really not done, if you will, because it's an ongoing kind of cyclical thing with these. So, again, that last performance measure about an implementation plan is something -- we are working on right now. We have the 500 policies. Those policies have been shared with the other departments. They are working on prioritizing those and bringing those back to you here in the coming months. So, again, implementing the plan, working the plan is coming up. Some of the challenges. I won't get into too much of this, but Vincent asked me to mention one of the challenges with this one, just bringing a community of over 100,000 people together to come up with a shared vision for our community was one of the challenges. Outreach and engagement. And, then, again implementation will be an ongoing challenge. Next steps. I mentioned it already, so I will try not to repeat, but the other thing I wanted to point out in the implementation is this. We are going to try to get away from quoting this priority growth area, but services and priority service areas. That's one of the key pieces to this strategic growth and define and articulating those growth goals. So, again, we are closing this out, but there is more work to be done as we look at those in prioritizing policies as well. So, we are working on those. I'm going to go to the next one, unless there is any questions on that objective. So, 1.C.2 is align future land use map with the city's growth goals. So, as you know the future land use map is part of the Comprehensive Plan. So, again, by adoption of the plan and the map we can --they are aligned. So, that December milestone was a major milestone. The map does represent the type of land use the city envisions Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 8 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 5 of 26 in various parts of the city. The only performance measure for this objective was to adopt the map. So, with that being completed this one is -- is closed out. One of the ongoing next steps, if you will, we are currently exploring some code changes that would limit the amount of times per year that the map could be amended. So, we are looking at change that to no more than once every six months. So, June and December type of a time frame for application and processing that. No more than. It doesn't mean we have to or want to change it, but that would be the maximum times would be once every six months and, again, so we will work the plan and try to encourage land uses and development in area -- areas and land uses that are consistent with the map. So, that one's pretty straightforward. But I will -- if there any questions on that one. Cavener: Mr. President? Bernt: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Yeah. Just on that comp plan map change process, I assume that just will be kind of an ongoing staff initiated process? Hood: So, Mr. President, Councilman Cavener, so staff will initiate it, but it is a code amendment. We will look at -- in fact, I have already met with Legal on some -- it's really just tweaks to our current language in the code, but it would make it pretty prescriptive and a little more black and white about when you can apply and how often we will process them, even if you have development associated with it. So, right now we are going to have this out. This says if you are proposing a concurrent application, an annexation or something, we will process it anytime. There would be, nope, we are only doing the map every six months. At least that's what we propose to do to change city code. I don't know how much of that you want to get into now, but we are also looking at a sunset, because we talked about the plan, you know, every day it's more -- I don't want to say it's outdated, but we change as a community and so some of the policies may not, so maybe a sunset clause that says, you know, hey, for the next three years this was our policy. But, then, when the plan gets to be, you know, four years old maybe we are not as tied to the land use as we had planned back in 2019, so -- Cavener: Mr. President? Bernt: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Caleb, I agree now is probably not the right time to go into that conversation, but I think that's something that should be planned to happen sooner rather than later looking forward. Hood: We plan to bring it back for more discussion. All right. And, then, the third one I'm going to cover is 1 .D.1, develop, promote and realize a master mobility plan, ensuring that residents and visitors have safe and efficient mobility options in the future. Again, we are never going to be done with that. So, we are always going to be working on this and -- and even the title of this kind of morphed as we developed the plan. The plan really Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 9 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 6 of 26 became a map. So, the master mobility map. And I actually have that pulled up and I didn't think this through all the way, so I'm going to go back over to the staff computer and give you a quick tutorial of what this plan is. So, bear with me just one second. Mr. President, in the interest of time I'm not going to re-load that up. So, we are -- we have developed with our Transportation Commission and the help of Kittelson and Associates, who was sub -- a sub consultant on the Comprehensive Plan -- developed a master mobility map. It's a future meeting topic on our Transportation Commission agenda. They were instrumental in getting a bunch of layers on a map. It looks real similar to what you see on the screen, but it doesn't have all the layers on it. So, I will at another time show you how that tool works. Again, it's only as good as the data that's feeding it and, for example, we will talk later on -- this afternoon about ACHD's integrated five year work plan. That's one of the layers in that map. So, when ACHD adopts a new plan we have got to update our map, so it reflects what that agency plans to do. But, essentially, what this plan is is ACHD's data on their five year plan and their 20 year plan, it's COMPASS and VRT, so you can -- you can look and see where bus routes are at currently and planned or stops that are planned and where they exist currently. Where sidewalks exist. Where roads are widened and what they are planned to be widened to. So, it's -- it's both the here and now, as well as the plan for our future network. The thing that we would like to grow on this is really kind of twofold. Again, besides just the maintenance to make sure we have got good data and it's pointing to information with ITD and ACHD and COMPASS-VRT, but it's to have our Transportation Commission look at changes in technology, so what are we -- what are we going to be doing to plan for e-scooters. We have already had -- have had a little bit of experience with that, but a multi-modal network. The drones, autonomous vehicles, what -- what role do those play in our community or possibly play in our community and, then, looking out further than our transportation agencies typically do. Twenty years is the maximum they are looking out. Twenty years comes and goes pretty quick. So, we want to look out 40, 50, maybe even a hundred years and what should we be doing now to plan for those future generations. So, that's kind of the next iteration. There is a foundation in place, but the transportation commission is really going to take this ball and start to build on it with some of the things I just mentioned and what should we be doing to plan for, again, a multi-modal -- where is our slide? Safe and efficient mobility options into the future. So, we are closing this out. But, again, it's -- it's an ongoing objective that the city has and as staff we will continue to move this forward. So, again, I'm sorry I didn't preload -- I meant to and -- and forgot to pre-load the rest of the layers here, but I will stand for any questions you may have and I will show you that -- that tool, that plan at a future date. Bernt: Any questions for Caleb? Thanks, Caleb. Hood: Thank you. Miles: Council President, Council Members, I have got the close out presentation for 3.A.2, which is improving citizen access to government and as Caleb mentioned, this is one of those that you get to the end and as you know you never stop improving, it's just we are at the end of this iteration and so will certainly look to operationalize this and look moving forward what does improving citizen access continue to look like, but with that we Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 10 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 7 of 26 will touch on a few things, sort of service updates. As you are aware, we have started taking phone testimony and e-mail testimony. We also have the capability of doing video testimony inside of things like e-mails. It is a little clunky right now because of file sizes and things of that nature, but we do have the ability to do that and that information is posted as part of our public noticing when it comes to public hearings. So, I know that we have seen some video files in previous hearings. We have also got publication and live streaming of various events, whether it's these City Council meetings, town halls, we have pushed those things forward and are able to do those as well, as well as looking at surveys. I think there has been discussions about whether or not you do statistically valid or pulling surveys through social media. Honestly, I think those are really case by case basis, depending on what information you as a body are looking for on any given topic and so each of those will be considered as they move forward. So, those are some of the service updates that we have seen throughout the last six months or so since the last update. Challenges. I think the video testimony is probably one of those challenges and how you just manage the size of those videos and how does that look from a testimony perspective. How do you manage it? Do you take text messages and if you have large scale hearings, like Costco's of the world, how do you manage hundreds, potentially thousands of inputs in a live meeting. So, we will continue to look at that ongoing as we move forward. And, then, you have got various services that other agencies offer that we have looked at. For instance, the DMV through the county. County just put out an article that said they may slow that process down now based on the funding and some of the things that are going on at the legislature. So, we will continue to work with those agencies, continue to look at services as they relate to Meridian and what makes the right best decision for Meridian and what's the best thing for the community. Next steps. The performance measure is hanging out there. There is a survey that will go out in late spring or early summer to evaluate. We are trying to get to 65 percent satisfaction up from 61 . Obviously, it's not completed yet, but it is implemented, we are moving that forward, so we will bring that report back to you as soon as that survey result is complete and, then, we also have the advisory voting element that is hanging out there. We had hoped for some movement this legislative session. Due to other activity in the valley that didn't happen, so we will be working with the clerk's office in the county for the next legislative cycle to see whether or not the city should take something on and, if so, what does that look like and certainly discussions with you all about what that means moving forward from an advisory commission. So, with that I will stand for any questions on 3.A.2. Bernt: Any questions for Dave? Perreault: Mr. President? Bernt: Mrs. Perreault. Perreault: So, you had said that -- that the goal was to reach 65 percent satisfaction, so -- in the result of the survey, not participation of survey -- of people being surveyed; is that right? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 11 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 8 of 26 Miles: Council President, Council Woman Perreault, that's correct. Yes. So, to actually see an improvement in the public involvement question of the survey. Perreault: Okay. I see. Thank you. Strader: Mr. President? Bernt: Mrs. Strader. Strader: Just wanted to maybe put a placeholder, you know, for further discussions about potential town hall meetings or some other types of meetings where we are going to the city and meet with people in different parts of Meridian. It just feels like that could be a future discussion item that fits really well with responsive government and we can each approach it differently or -- or have an open discussion at a later point, but just wanted to make sure we have that on the list as something that -- that should be discussed. Bernt: Mrs. Strader, that's going to be Item 4-E, so we -- we will be discussing that today -- this evening. Miles: All right. Thank you. Campbell: Mr. Council President, Members of the Council, I had Objective 4.C.1, which was to define the educational and financial, food, housing, transportation and healthcare environment to assist in determining -- in determining the socio-economic profile within the community. So, to do this we -- we defined what those mean and we also identified metrics that we could use to evaluate those. Some of the metrics -- we ran into an issue where we aren't able to gather all the data right now, so we may need to work with other entities to maybe build a business registry or with Council to identify what the mix of housing -- what we would want that to look like. We are going to continue to assess and evaluate the -- the indicators, so that we can -- if necessary and see what it looks like, how it's actually serving our community and we are currently working on 4.C.3, which connects us with the stakeholders for all the different indicators, so that we can see what's going on and our next step after this is complete will be to consult with them to see if there is any gaps in services that have been identified. With that I will stand for questions. Bernt: Any questions? Thank you. Campbell: Thanks. Siddoway: Council President, Members of the Council, I'm here to report out on Objective 5.A.4, which was to foster development of Discovery Park, to uniquely blend arts, entertainment, and culture. This is actually my second time closing this one out. The first time -- this was originally written specifically about Discovery Park and to be about the development of the concept planning, design development, and construction documents leading up to -- to the construction of phase one of that park. We -- as we completed that one there was discussion among Council that we would like to morph this objective into Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 12 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 9 of 26 addressing art and theming discovery opportunities in more of our neighborhood parks. So, the -- that has been -- that it was done a couple of years ago. Over the last year we have had meetings with the Arts Commission, the Parks and Recreation Commission, the Mayor's office looking at the art and theming opportunities in the -- those neighborhood parks. Those ideas were captured, identified for all the existing neighborhood parks. The CFP was updated last year and that --this objective is now complete. During that process the first priorities that were identified were Renaissance Park in south Meridian and Champion Park in north Meridian. Both of those art projects were recently completed. We now have ribbon-cutting dedication ceremonies planned for April 2nd and 9th at noon, first two Thursdays in April. We hope that you will come and join us if you can and there are our future ones as well that are built into the CFP on about an every other year rotation starting in FY-22 through FY-2030 and, of course, the realities of those will depend on budgets and discussions about the budget at those times. So, with that I will stand for any questions. Bernt: Any questions for Mr. Siddoway? Koontz: I'm back. All right. And you all received a memo on the high priority updates. We did this a little differently this year. Do any of you have any questions on any of the high priority updates that I sent out or if you have any questions on any of those updates that I -- I sent you? Okay. This is short and sweet. So, some of the next steps on our current plan. In September 2020 1 will update you one final time on our current strategic plan, what objectives might carry into that next plan, which objectives might be still relevant and I think that will be informed on our next strategic plan discussion. In March of 2021 1 will deliver a final report to Council. You know, how are -- how are the ongoing performance measures doing in relation to what we -- what some of these directors just -- just presented. How are we doing with that -- with that close out of that plan. What worked. What did not work. The good, the bad and the ugly, that will be -- that will be presented to you at that time and I look to -- and look to close that out and -- and give you guys as much information as you can and kind of do that autopsy report and dig into the details and see how we did. So, with that I will stand for questions. Bernt: Any questions for Vince? One question. So, when will the -- the current strategic plan that we are working on right now, when will that take into effect? Koontz: The -- the new strategic plan that we are working on? My goal is to have it ready and complete -- framework adopted and strategies underneath it by the end of the calendar year when this plan ends. So, my hope is to have the adoption of the framework, like the mission, vision, focus areas and goals, the high-level framework adopted sometime during the year and, then, we can go back and work with staff on those -- what are the strategies we would like to achieve to reach this goal and, you know, some of the more detailed pieces. But, ideally, love -- love to have that framework adopted sometime in August and September for time frame, with the full plan adopted before the end of the year, so we don't have any gaps in that strategic direction for the city. Bernt: Perfect. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 13 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 10 of 26 Koontz: So -- Strader: Mr. President? Bernt: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I just wanted to make a comment. Vincent, I think the strategic plan working sessions have been really helpful and if -- you know, if you feel like you need more direction from Council as a body or more direction specifically in the future, I'm sure we all would encourage you to reach out to us. I think it's been really, you know, a good -- good work session so far. Koontz: Thank you, Council Woman Strader. Thank you. B. Consideration of Approval of the Union Urban Renewal District Eligibility Report and Corresponding Resolution (No. 20-2188) Bernt: Going on to Item 4-B, consideration for approval of the Union Urban Renewal District Eligibility Report and that will be done by Mr. Cameron. Borton: Mr. President? Bernt: Mr. Borton. Borton: Before we do that, I have done this before, but I will just do it again to disclose that we do work for the renewal district, our firm has. I don't touch it. So, I will just continue to abstain from this and any consideration or voting on it. Arial: Thank you, Mr. President, Members of the Council. So good to be with you as always. Beautiful day. Beautiful opportunity to talk about our downtown in particular and some of the incredible revitalization and redevelopment that's occurring. Specifically tonight we are here to talk to you about the first step I guess in the official process of moving forward with de-annexation and, then, a creation of a new district in our downtown that encompasses -- as you can see at this map here the -- the Union Block, as well as what we are calling this Civic Block in inner downtown. I just wanted to let each of you know that this is, again, the first step in that process and so the Meridian Development Corporation has adopted the plan and per that process it now comes before you for your consideration as the ultimate decision making body on that and, again, it's moving that forward. So, what you have here -- this eligibility report was created by consultants from our RFP selected partner Galena Fund. We have a representative here, Phil Kushlan here with us, so -- who is the main architect of the eligibility report and -- and so with that I will just direct you to kind of our staff analysis of that. So, direct you to page 15 of the report. I will just quickly go there. Quickly will be see how quickly I can get there. So, for eligibility for urban renewal per code you have to kind of meet ten -- or have a reasonable basis for meeting the criteria of the -- of the code and as you can see here there is these Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 14 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 11 of 26 ten basic tenants. The current area meets eight of them and I will just point you to the ones that it does not meet. So, diversity of ownership and tax delinquency I think it's important to note there that, you know, diversity is somewhat difficult because it's a very confined, very small district. You have, essentially, you know, two blocks there that you're looking at and, then, as far as tax delinquency, you know, if you have people that are paying their taxes that are so -- you know, you either meet or you don't meet that, but that being said --and, of course, the --the Civic Block is civically owned, so there is no taxation occurring as it stands now. So, with that said, you know, staff feels very comfortable that the consultant's report meets the intent of the code and that the eligibility is -- is -- is warranted. It's also somewhat redundant, meaning that this area is currently in our downtown district as it stands. So, arguably, already qualify as per our existing plan, where it's now taking it out and making it its own specific district. So, again, from staff's perspective we -- we would recommend approval of the plan and -- or of the eligibility report, that, then, would kick off this continuing process that we would go down and just to kind of highlight that for you in your packet, so if-- if accepted today we would move to work with the consultant and the -- and the other MDC staff to further draft the plan and, then, we would look to bring that draft plan back to you next week at the work session, so that you could have a review of that plan -- of that draft and collect any specific comment on the plan and, then, we would -- then it would go to MDC for their consideration of approval on the 25th and, then, from there, if approved, it would move on to our P&Z Commission April 16th and, then, we would look to bring that to this body again in a -- in a final form in June. There is a series of readings. Those can be waived. I understand that we have planned in our schedule to have the full three readings there and looking to adopt this by the -- the end of June, so -- I did provide each of you, just in case -- you know, just a refresher on urban renewal. There is this -- this document that was prepared for each of you. If you have any questions about that certainly we can -- we can talk through any questions you may have. With that, Mr. President, I will stand for any questions. C. Resolution No. 20-2188: A Resolution Of The Mayor And The City Council Of The City Of Meridian Accepting That Certain Report On Eligibility For The Union District Area As An Urban Renewal Area And Revenue Allocation Area And Justification For Designating The Area As Appropriate For An Urban Renewal Project; Determining That The Area Identified In The Report Is Deteriorated Or Deteriorating; Designating Such Area As Appropriate For An Urban Renewal Project; Directing The Urban Renewal Agency To Prepare An Urban Renewal Plan For The Area To Include A Revenue Allocation Provision As Allowed By Law; Directing The Urban Renewal Agency To Prepare A Plan Amendment To The Downtown District Plan To Deannex The Union District Area; And Providing An Effective Date Bernt: Any questions for Cameron? No questions? Okay. Thank you, Cameron. Appreciate it. That leads us to the resolution for the eligibility -- eligibility report. Do I have a motion for that resolution? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 15 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 12 of 26 Perreault: Mr. President. I move that we adopt Resolution No. 20-2188. Strader: Second. Bernt: I have a motion and the second. All those in favor say aye. Any nays? Borton: Abstain. Bernt: Okay. Motion passes. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSTAIN. D. Community Development: 2020 Roadway, Intersection and Community Program Priorities Bernt: Item 4-D, Community Development 2020 Roadway Intersection and Community Program priorities. Back to Caleb. Hood: Thank you, Mr. President, Members of the Council. So, annually the city sends a list of our highest priority roadway intersections and community programs projects over to ACHD for their consideration as they come up with their integrated five year work plan. I kind of mentioned it as we were closing out some of the strategic plan objectives, but the integrated five year work plan is basically the start of ACHD's budget. So, they have a two-year budget over there, but they -- they look to their five year plan to basically set their budget and their projects. So, we try to influence that and we do influence it. We get bonus points, if you will, for projects that are higher up on our priority list. So, I gave this spiel to -- to the Transportation Commission and I will remind you let's not get caught up in the weeds on, you know, what should be priority 33 and 37. It's really our top ten or 15 that they really care about. They are not going was this priority 47 or 48? We are not making that much of a change over there, but our top projects they want to make happen and if you look at where -- right now -- and I will have to show you a little bit that -- of that in the ACHD's integrated five year work plan tool that they have created this year, but we do have an influence, we do have an impact, they do care what projects are high on our priority list and I don't think it's any coincidence that the roadways that are most congested, that you see the most accidents are the ones that they are improving. Those are the ones that are on our priority list, too, but there is quite a bit that goes into it, so -- but they have asked this year for our priority list to be returned to them no later than March 20th. So, today's the 10th. Hoping to get through it today. If we need to we have next Tuesday, but that's it, we got to -- I got to get a letter or this list out to them by middle part of next week. So, in the memo that I prepared for today's meeting I told you a couple things. One, that I would go through this interactive map that now is on the screen, so I will spend just a few minutes on that. That I would share the Transportation Commission's recommendation, so you have that already, but I did print out some hard copies. It might be easier to look at hard copies if anybody wants them. I think I printed five. So, maybe not quite enough for everybody. But I will pass those -- and, then, a draft letter. I also mentioned a draft cover letter. We don't have to put a draft cover letter on. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 16 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 13 of 26 Most years we have. I'm just going to put a little context to our -- our list. So, there is some new messaging in the draft letter I put together for this year, but let me pause real quick and just hand this to the clerk, so you can all have copies of that. And, Mr. President, it's your meeting, but I was kind of planning on going through the -- the list of priorities and, then, we can double back to the letter and -- and all that if you would like, but if you want to read that, you know -- I mean if there is a lull in our conversation or whatever or just give me feedback after the -- after the fact. But I think the biggest thing is to make sure we got our list right, so -- but first just -- and I won't spend too much time on this, but I did want to -- this is a pretty cool tool that ACHD -- and there is a lot of information -- and, again, I'm not going to go through all of it, but this interactive tool that they have created you can click on a project, it will tell you the project name, when it was designed, the construction year. It will send you to that project website as well, so if you want even more information than what's -- for most people this is -- this is enough information, but if you want to additional information, like who the project manager is -- this one should have it. That will be on their website as well. And we will talk about community programs as well. So, if you want to look at community programs and what's already in -- in the -- their integrated five year work plan, maintenance, bridges -- again, we won't -- we won't look at that too much -- or at all today. You can see what -- what projects in Meridian are already on their horizon for construction the next five to seven years. So, this is -- this is a -- a pretty neat tool to see and if you look at the -- the spreadsheet, so -- do we have enough for everybody? Not quite. Does anybody want one that didn't get one, I can run a print real quick. But if you look at our top roadways and intersection projects, five of the top six are in ACHD's program right now. So, that's pretty good. I mean -- and we only have a couple of them that are -- that are that high up. A project on Victory and one on Ten Mile, 16 and 17. But roughly half of our top 20 projects are in ACHD's program, which is pretty good when you consider how many roads that they are charged with -- with maintaining. So, I encourage you to in my -- in the packet to play around with this. Hopefully you had an opportunity to do that. If not it will -- it's still up and live, so you can do it after the fact. But I think I'm going to transition, then, away from this tool, but this is pretty -- pretty neat to see where -- where projects are at in the county, not just in Meridian, but you can see how we compare what's going on in -- in other jurisdictions as well. The other thing that's really cool is Brian has created this -- this map that's also interactive. Right now it's a little busy, because I have got everything turned on. I have got your roadways, got your intersections, and I got your community programs. The community programs are the green ones, intersections are in blue and roadways are in red. So, this isn't everything, but if you wanted to say, hey, where is -- where is Ustick to Ten Mile. Oh, there it is. It's -- it's priority eight. It will zoom right to -- right to that project and there is some more information that you can -- you know, real similar information. So, this is really hyperlinked to a lot of what ACHD's interactive tool is. So, it gives you a lot of the numbers and we are tracking it historically now, too. Where has this project -- you know, where did it start. We aren't going all the way back in history, but, you know, five year average. Where did it start, at 28 and now we are up to priority number eight now. I didn't mean to do that on purpose, but I'm going to use this as an opportunity. The Ustick corridor. It's meant to be. The Ustick corridor. This is one that the Transportation Commission talked about when they came to -- up with the priority list. So, you can see that on there. It jumped from 18 to eight this year. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 17 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 14 of 26 With Owyhee High School coming online, some of discussions even we have had over the past couple weeks about service growth areas, service priority areas, that Ustick corridor is one that I think, you know, is -- is going to be more -- more and more key. So, the roadway right now is currently improved to five lanes just about to this drainage pond that ACHD has and, then, it necks back down from Ustick all the say to the county line is a two lane roadway. So, this next mile segment has jumped in the top ten right now and as a corridor you're going to start to see that probably be widened, because that goes into Nampa and that's a major corridor in Nampa, too. We met with them and Public Works last week -- within the last couple weeks anyways and they have some -- they are prioritizing the Ustick corridor. So, as a regional corridor it starts to make a lot more sense as well and it always has, but to improve that, to move traffic kind of on a regional level between Chinden, Ustick, 1-84, Franklin, you kind of have those every other mile type of a -- a series setup where you really need to move east-west traffic, Ustick makes some sense. So, there is some question on the spreadsheet that way, but props to Brian. This is, again, a really -- really cool tool that can do way more and we are going to -- we will work on some other dashboard type of stuff, so if you look on the right-hand side here you can see just how many requests we have, how many projects totally -- you know, total in ACHD's five year work plan, how many of those are our projects, but we can -- if there is other metrics you want to see reported out here we can. One of the things we just talked about this week is maybe -- that shows what -- what is in the five year work plan, but we are kind of similar to 16, 17, 18, 19. When we get built in 2019, 2018, 2017, number of projects, how much cost, how much investment in our community over those years. So, for next year we are going to -- we are going to build that in this tool, too, but there is a lot of neat stuff that we can report out if you're curious. So, if you are -- if you think-- think of something throw it by us, I can't guarantee we can make that happen, but we will see what data we have and would love to share that if there is some information you would like to see. So, again, this is a -- this is something that right now is only available -- and don't want to get into all of this, but basically you have to have a license for this level of mapmaking, so it's not available for the public, because we don't want to purchase the license for the public to use at all, but this information is all public. So, I mean this isn't proprietary or anything like that, it's all information that we are basically pointing to data that others have and consolidating that. So, I just wanted to kind of show you that. We can use this, too, as we further this -- this discussion. If you wanted to look at -- you know, let's just say geographical equity or something, you know, how many projects are in south Meridian versus north Meridian, well, you can see our -- our top intersection roadway projects in south Meridian, number six, Ten Mile. So,just at a glance it looks like, you know, got at least a handful of your top ten projects that are in south Meridian and, you know, again, kind of eyeball things even if you just want to kind of look at it that way for -- again geographical equity just for example. So, I'm going to jump to the -- the spreadsheet. But, again, we can go back to that map if you wanted to. I do want to call a few things to your attention as we get through this and I will just -- in the interest of time we can't -- can't talk about all of the projects, but I do want to spend some time in the top, again, ten, 15, 20. Priority number three I want to spend just a second on. You can see that -- that's the one in the top five or six that isn't in their program right now and that's Locust Grove, Fairview to Ustick. One of the notes in here -- and this is going to be somewhat repetitive -- sorry I don't have -- is to discuss with ACHD the scope. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 18 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 15 of 26 So, right now the -- this segment is planned to be widened to five lanes. There is some serious neighborhood impacts. This is real similar to the South Locust Grove leg that Brian talked with you about two weeks ago. So, real similar neighborhood impacts if you look at this -- so, this is just between that Fred Meyer and Ustick there is some neighborhoods that get really close and you -- if you widen that out to five lanes you're -- you're buying houses and you're in people's backyards. So, there is -- there is a little bit -- and, then, we had high level conversations before about, you know, yes, we want to move traffic, but also you got livability factors and people's -- you know, impacts to real property that you have there. So, I'm going to have a conversation with them. You will be part of that conversation about, you know, does it make sense to have Locust Grove north of there be a full five lane roadway. What are the impacts to -- to residents there. And I'm not going to go through all of them that have a similar -- that's really the only one that I can think of that's planned for five where maybe three is appropriate. We have a lot of the other roadways that I have got highlighted here that are planned for three or maybe they want to be five, but I have highlighted those for you. So, if there is any of those that you also want me to roll into that conversation and kind of have simultaneous conversation about are we planning for the right number of lanes, three, rive or seven, if any of those project descriptions don't look right to you let me know, but, again, just for ease in -- in here you can see which roadways are planned for something less than five, so I have highlighted those blue. Then maybe just a little bit more to kind of orient you on the priority list and I already mentioned the Ustick corridor, but these are potential high priority project corridors. So, I'm not -- I kind of want some direction from Council if we, in fact, want to leave this -- some of these notes as we send this list off to ACHD. But I mentioned the Ustick corridor. One of the other corridors that we mentioned -- east-west corridors I should say is Victory. So, a lot of Overland is improved. Overland Road is five lanes from Ten Mile back in through Boise. Franklin is almost there. You got that one segment. In fact, there was a news story today just coming out of Amazon at the county line that isn't improved, but the rest of Franklin is improved to five lanes all the way through our community. But, really, Ustick and Victory there seems to be some opportunity. Fairview-Cherry, largely is improved as well. There is some segments again as you get closer to the county that aren't quite, but we really looked at those two as potentially priority corridors. So, there is some questions there in that far right-hand column about do we want to call that out. And, then, north-south -- and this in conversations with the Mayor and other staff. You know, we have been working pretty hard on those corridors that connect to interchanges at 1-84 and it's maybe time to show some love to those corridors that are just overpasses or potential overpasses. So, this ties in with the Linder Road overpass discussion and if you have had a chance to look at the draft letter that's -- that's a highlight there is to say Linder Road is a key corridor. The overpass is critical to not just our community, but region traffic -- I'm paraphrasing here. It's in the letter, but -- but Linder Road is -- is a north-south one, as well as Locust Grove. So, a lot of our priority projects are on Locust Grove and it just made sense to -- to kind of call those out. So, not trying to redirect your attention to the letter, but -- but Linder Road and even Locust Grove north-south and -- and Victory and Ustick as -- so, those are kind of-- again, kind of highlighted on the right-hand side of that spreadsheet. I do think that we should, you know, somehow designate Victory -- and, then, again, this is what the transportation generally came up with as a rule to say let's -- let's work on corridors, not just, you know, Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 19 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 16 of 26 plug our fingers in the dam and get leaks everywhere, but let's work on -- you know, let's work on completing a corridor and, then,jump to the next corridor and work on that largely. Not that it has to be just one corridor, but -- but a corridor kind of philosophy. So, I think those are the -- I want to hear from you more, but I think that, hopefully, sets the stage for the rest of the discussion. Maybe just one more thing I had in my notes on that -- on that priority project three. ACHD is going to group this project with -- I'm sorry. Not that-- not that. It's the intersection of Locust Grove and Fairview. So, it's project -- priority project four. When they started to look at this it just made sense to -- to widen Fairview back to Eagle as well. So, not only are you getting the intersection, but you're getting the roadway improvements back to the Eagle intersection, a seven lane roadway. So, there is a question in here should we -- and combine priority 34 and four. I would say no. Let's just go ahead and leave it the way we have it. But know that priority 34, which was to widen Fairview, is lower on the list, but they are designing those together right now and they are tracking together for construction right now. So, more to come on that. But I think those are the things that I had highlighted and I will look to make notes, make changes kind of in the spreadsheet as I hear comments, feedback, or if you just want to endorse this list I'm okay with that, too, and I'm sure the Transportation Commission would appreciate it, so -- Bernt: Thank you, Caleb. So, Council, we have an opportunity to discuss this list and give thoughts. If you want to change things around, if you want to add things, give your opinions, so on and so forth. So, do we have anyone that wants to kick it off? Perreault: Mr. President? Bernt: Mrs. Perreault. Perreault: I would like to ask Caleb a quick question. Bernt: Sure. Perreault: Can you clarify what -- where it says future versus not programmed, is that something that is -- is that because it's been detailed in the five-year plan that it's something in the future versus nothing being -- being mentioned by ACHD and it -- does that just stay future until some point that they decide to add a date to it? What's the difference between those two? Hood: That's a good question. Mr. President, Council Woman Perreault, so future -- so, it's in the program, so it is, essentially, like you explained it. ACHD's five year-- so, there is five years; right? '21, '22, '23, '24 and '25. And, then, they have what they call preliminary development, which are, essentially, the next two years of construction and that's your on deck, if you will. So, when we do the 2022 to 2026, roughly half of these projects will be a named construction year and you will add some more in the PD. Future is real similar, but it doesn't -- the -- the -- the construction dollars aren't even there, but it's -- so, it's on the radar, but it's not quite as far along as even PD or preliminary development. So, it's, again, largely as you described it. But those are kind of the -- the Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 20 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 17 of 26 layers, if you will, of the program. Perreault: Thank you. Strader: Mr. President? Bernt: Mrs. Strader. Strader: Caleb, I was hoping you could point out on the map exactly where the new Owyhee High School is going to be for us and, then, I have a follow-up after that. Hood: So, the high school -- high school -- the ball fields are on the south side. The high school building roughly sits right -- right here. Strader: Got it. Mr. President, follow up. You know, one of the things I -- I definitely subscribe to the corridor philosophy, because I listened in on the Transportation Commission meeting and I got what they were saying about, you know, feel the pain in one area, just get it done, don't intersperse these projects everywhere. One thing I'm struggling with a little bit is the prioritization of McMillan and maybe the answer is we are prioritizing Ustick first, because we agreed to accomplish that first and really focus there, but I have been receiving a lot of feedback from folks that live on McMillan. It's come up in a lot of development applications and I just -- I think I would like to have a rationale of why Ustick versus McMillan and -- and maybe the answer is, hey, next year when we prioritize we are going to focus on McMillan, but I am getting -- and I -- candidly I live close to there, too, so I understand that -- the traffic nightmare along McMillan personally, but also I am receiving a lot of feedback from neighbors and residents on NextDoor and other avenues. So, I just wanted to have a discussion about that. Hood: Mr. President, can I -- before you have discussion maybe just put -- I can answer I think a lot of those questions -- I'm not saying it can't be higher. Here is one of the reasons it doesn't score very well at ACHD and it's one of the things I even alluded to -- if you look at the description, those power poles and Lemp Canal are very expensive to move and so they are only planning on it ever being a three lane roadway, which doesn't add a whole lot of capacity. It doesn't help the congestion problems that are out there today. So, it doesn't -- you don't get a lot of bang for the buck if you will. So, that's why it's -- it's tough and we could ask them to look at it some more as a -- as a five lane roadway, but the impacts and the setbacks you have already got along that corridor or where we are allowing development to set back to, we are -- for example, the apartments that are there at Meridian and McMillan are right on the intersection. If you make that wider now you're buying brand new -- I don't know if you have to buy them. But you're getting really, really close to those and, again, the cost to pipe the irrigation facilities and move the -- they are the big power poles. I'm not trying to make excuses, just a rationale on why. But if you look at this -- I mean it's been hanging out there kind of middle of the road, I agree with you, I mean I see it, it's -- it's backed up. ACHD, you know, did widen it through the Locust Grove intersection, but back the west it's a farm to market road still. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 21 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 18 of 26 Strader: Mr. President, just a follow up. Part of what I'm reacting to -- I'm also looking at the -- I guess the -- the peak hour -- I'm assuming this means level of service map. I am seeing in there I guess a -- maybe what this -- if you can explain to me what this means. It looks like there is a level of service with the red color that indicates F, which I always felt was a failing grade, so I guess I -- I understand that it's expensive and so I guess my question would be if it is lower in their priority list because of the expense, does that mean like there is a strategy, like we would rather proposed, then, projects that they are more likely to score higher in the hopes that -- that those things match? Is that how this sort of works or is it -- and how could we get a project like that to move forward if it scores so low for that reason? Hood: Mr. President, there is a lot in -- in that. So, let me start with how to read the level of service map -- and, again, it's just -- and I was looking to see if there were any transportation engineers in the room and there aren't. Think of it as a letter grade. I mean you're right on. I mean red is bad. Green is good. Scorecard type thing. What I will point out is it is p.m. peak and it's two hours of the p.m. peak. So, I think it's -- I think it's 4:00 to 6:00, but don't quote me on that. It may be 5:00 to 7:00. Somewhere in there. But it's the p.m. peak hour. They look at those hours and, then, they will take it your letter grade. I do want -- so, a couple things -- more things in your -- your questions and comments there. It's not just about the cost, it -- but it is cost benefit largely. So, again, because it's -- you're spending so much, but you're only gaining a center turn lane out of the deal, it doesn't score really well on congestion mitigation. So, you're not adding a whole lot of capacity to the roadway. So, they really do put a lot of stock in the cost benefit. The other thing I just want to make sure we are thinking about -- and, again, I get it. This is a -- it is a high priority. But with Chinden being widened -- I'm hopeful, anyways, that that relieves some of the congestion on McMillan and that provides an alternate route that is more regional that can provide some relief to -- so, in a year or maybe two let's see what McMillan looks like, because -- because the models don't show it needing to be widened to five lanes, because you have got Ustick and you have got Chinden that can provide kind of that through traffic and McMillan can be more for the Paramounts of the world and the folks that aren't going maybe to Nampa, but, you know -- because right now you get people that are using McMillan as a regional corridor and it's really not long term planned to be that -- that artery, if you will, so -- Strader: One little follow up and, then, I will get off of the McMillan train. Yeah, I think that makes sense. I also think there is some rationale -- there is only so many construction projects one area can handle at one time and I think with the amount going on on Chinden and, then, with Ustick potentially being under construction -- we have already got Meridian Road. I just think the residents there are going to be, you know, up in arms already. So, I feel the rationale. I understand what you're saying. I guess I'm okay with waiting for a year to see if -- or two to see if the Chinden Road widening and Ustick corridor really solve that problem, but I do think in the future if we come back and we finally have the same issues going on on McMillan, we absolutely have to move that up in a future year. But thanks for that context, Caleb, that was really helpful for me. Hoaglun: Mr. President? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 22 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 19 of 26 Bernt: Mr. Hoaglun. Hoaglun: A question, Caleb. On number eight, Ustick Road, Ten Mile to Linder, that has -- for a quarter mile it has the Five Mile Creek to -- on the -- on the south side of that, so that's -- that's going to be very expensive from the --ACHD has a pond there that you see in the gray and, then, the creek comes along Ustick Road until it veers a little bit there and right there coming into Pebblestone, right there in the I of Ustick, West Ustick Road, there -- there is no turn lane and -- and I understand your comments -- you were talking to Council Woman Strader earlier about they look at congestion relief and doing things, which means widening, due to the expense -- and we know we are in competition with other communities and their top ten lists and there is only so much money in the pot, but do they look at things that they can do now -- when someone turns left on that with no turn lane and traffic's coming to the east, you get back up past Linder Road, because of no left turn lane and it's just -- and this was done in the mid 2000s and I don't know why they didn't put in -- probably because it -- but there is room to the -- to the north side to move that in. But, anyway, where I'm going with this -- do they look at those types of things to put in a low-cost temporary solution until funding is available for a much more expensive solution? Hood: Mr. President, Councilman Hoaglun, yeah, that's a good question -- thought and I was just and quickly thinking as you brought that up, I -- you must not have been on the Council when we -- when we had the interim intersections that we asked ACHD to improve. So, some interim intersections -- it's relatively low cost -- cost benefit, relatively low investment for a bigger return. So, there were -- I think there were three or four intersections that we asked ACHD -- similar to this one. And -- and this could be a great candidate -- if it's not in the program -- so, if they are not looking to fully invest in that and rebuild in the next five years and, then, get a -- you know, it's five plus year life cycle out of adding a turn lane like that and signalizing it, we have been relatively successful in asking those types of things. Typically what we do with that is put that -- those types requests in our cover letter. So, that could be a candidate to say, hey, this isn't -- it's not worthy of like a real -- it's not a real project, but if you have some maintenance forces out there and can scab on a little asphalt and maybe throw up a -- you know, a turn lane, maybe a signal, or -- but even a turn lane might help, you know, that's fodder usually for -- for a cover letter. Hey, if you can fit this in -- Hoaglun: Mr. President? Bernt: Mr. Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Yeah. Caleb, that's -- that's all it is is just a turn lane at this time. You know, you just need some place to move out and let that traffic continued to flow instead of backing up and -- and -- and causing congestion. I do want to add one other question as we continue down Ustick Road to Black Cat, in context of the -- of the new high school coming in. Black Cat and Ustick is a four -- currently a four way stop and I -- I remember seeing it on the list somewhere, but it was a ways down. Yeah. Number 23. And a dual lane roundabout in -- again, is this an intersection that can have a temporary -- whether Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 23 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 20 of 26 it's a signal light, as opposed to four way stop. With a signal light you don't gain that much, but you do gain people not having to decide do I go or not go or not pay attention and I will just sit there, because I don't know what I'm doing. Not that anybody has been behind one of those drivers. But, you know, those -- those are the types of things with that high school opening up there and -- and I'm not sure of all the boundaries, again, how much traffic will be going from that direction, but I'm sure there will be some. It's just one of those projected points that as we look at the high school and what's going to be taking place out there, what -- what can we do to mitigate some of those things earlier, as opposed to waiting for full funding for full -- whether it's a roundabout or seven lane intersections or what have you. So, that's -- that's what I wanted to call out as well. Bernt: Did you get that, Caleb? Hood: I did. Bernt: Very good. Perreault: Mr. President? Bernt: Mrs. Perreault. Perreault: If there is no other comments, with that being said I would like to propose that we hold off one more week on making a final decision on this to get some additional time to review based on what Caleb has shared and potentially some additional things we might like to add to the letter. So, I'm curious what my other Council Members thoughts are on that. Bernt: A terrible idea. Any other -- I don't think that would be a big deal. I think it's good that we give ourselves some time in order to do that. Before we go on, though, I think that making a high priority-- or at least calling out Victory Road, you know, east-west, you know, I think that's going to have somewhat of the same problem as some of those busier streets on the -- on the north as well. Especially when another high school goes in over there somewhere or, you know, with all the growth that's happening in the south, that certainly is going to be an issue as well. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Bernt: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Really, then, next week what is it that we are -- is it we want just -- want a week to marinate and, then, the goal is to come back next week and potentially make changes to the priority list? Hood: Mr. President? Bernt: Yeah. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 24 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 21 of 26 Hood: If I could just ask while you are looking at the priority list, I will take the feedback on the letter, too. And maybe even just a little bit of direction. I mean what Councilman Hoaglun mentioned -- or requested on the two intersections and turn lanes there, I'm going to incorporate that in, unless someone shakes their head and says, no, don't. But I'm going to work that in the letter and probably the Victory as a high priority corridor in the letter. Is there any other initial feedback you have on the letter that you would like me to include or -- review it at your leisure. If you can get that back to me and, then, I will regurgitate it back to everybody, you know, Friday, but with the packet or whatever. Cavener: Mr. President? Bernt: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: And maybe this is a conversation that we either have now or over the next week. In the past, for our new Councils' benefit, the highway district has been very enthusiastic if the city has ever -- to volunteer to speak about a willingness to provide funds to help accelerate roadway projects. I don't know if that's something this body supports. It's something I'm in support of -- of specifically in some of our high demand needs. If we can get projects moved up on their list, because we are willing to allocate some bucks, that's something I would want to communicate in this letter that we stand willing and open to having those conversations with the highway district. Again, details yet to be determined, but when you look at -- I know we have talked in the past about number two. Number two doesn't become real without I think the city investing in some fashion or another, but I think there is a couple other spots around Meridian and Council Member Strader was speaking to one and Council Member Hoaglun was speaking about another, that we could potentially move at a higher rate if we as a city are willing to allocate some dollars. I -- just as an aside, something I have really struggled with -- we are not roadway authority. We are, essentially, using, you know, taxpayer dollars that are designed to be allocated for firefighters and parks and police officers to take on these transportation challenges. But I think our citizens expect it from us and if we can move things along it will make life better for them. I think we should at least be open to that conversation. Strader: Mr. President. I was just going to mention -- my understanding of that process is that the city would eventually be reimbursed; is that correct? If we front the dollars toward the highway district -- it's not a guarantee that we will be, but there is a -- a likelihood or a -- I guess I would need to understand that piece of it to get on board completely -- would be the likelihood of being reimbursed at a future date. In informal conversations with the Mayor it sounded like that type of a strategy was something he -- I don't want to speak for him -- it sounded like something that he was interested in exploring and I think if we flush that out that would make a lot of sense, but I would need to understand the likelihood of being reimbursed in the future or if we are just straight-up spending our city money on that, then, we just need to understand the magnitude of what we are talking about. Cavener: Mr. President? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 25 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 22 of 26 Bernt: Yeah. Cavener: I don't know if it was a question or a comment towards me or if you want me to respond I'm happy to. I think it's mixed. If you look at priority number two, Linder, Overland to Franklin, I think that in that case it could potentially be that we are -- we are purchasing right of way and we wouldn't be reimbursed. I think with other projects we come in, we do it, and, then, get a -- get reimbursed by developmental at a later point and I think those -- I think both are in play. Both move projects further on the -- on the list, but in some cases we could expect to be reimbursed, in other cases we wouldn't. Bernt: Mrs. Perreault. Perreault: I agree with Councilman Cavener's proposal, but I imagine there is more projects than we would have funds for, as always; right? And so the hope would be that if we were to invest those funds that it would improve response times for fire and for police. That would -- that would be an end -- an end goal and so I would suggest that we keep that in mind as we -- if we are going to spend those funds and we are going to prioritize them, that -- that we are making sure that it's improving the response times for our fire and police and, then, it, you know, isn't just about moving people in the city, but it's -- it also accomplishes a couple of goals. Cavener: Mr. President. I think it would be so hard for us to say we are willing to allocate dollars for these items. I just think that the letter is an opportunity to provide a little bit of that narrative and I think that's an opportunity to say we believe in this partnership, we recognize the demands of transportation in our community and we are willing to partner if it makes sense with the right project for our community. Hoaglun: Mr. President? Bernt: Mr. Hoaglun. Hoaglun: One more item I want to throw out there just for consideration and possibly for the letter is another turn lane and it goes back to a development we approved about a month ago. In fact, on Black Cat with Compass Charter School and that the intersection at Franklin and Black Cat is a seven legged one. In fact, you can see the gray concrete going up and, then, where it narrows up there to the south, Caleb, up there at the top and, then, you have Aviator Street and Compass school is back there, we know that -- and to the north of that is the property that will be developed and we know there is going to be sidewalk and right of way for a future expansion, but what I would like to see is if right there there are two houses it appears that just have right of way and it looks like they have prepared for that acquisition in the future and that would allow at least a turn lane to be put in with -- with a development and utilizing that land to the north of Aviator, a -- a turn lane to be put in. We know there is railroad up there and their future land needed for right of way, but just for a turn lane it might be one of those things that low-hanging fruit -- in other words, low dollars to put in a turn lane for -- for a school that's there would help with the safety. It doesn't address on the east -- I'm sorry, the west side, the sidewalk Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 26 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 23 of 26 that Council Woman Perreault had pointed out before, but at least on the east side where that property is going to be developed, there will be a sidewalk right to the railroad tracks, but not over. So, there is still a gap. But at least it's a start and if we could get a turn lane there that would certainly be a benefit there. Perreault: Mr. President? Bernt: Mrs. Perreault. Perreault: One more thing on that is that now that Ten Mile is -- has been under construction, Chinden's under construction, both the Black Cat and Ten Mile intersections, traffic down Black Cat has just like tripled and while that's a temporary thing, it's not in the sense that we have at least another two, three years of -- of improvements along those two roads. So, just -- just to point that out. But the -- in -- in -- you know, in a few months' time Black Cat Road has now become this major thoroughfare that it didn't used to be and I don't anticipate that once people change their traffic patterns sometimes they just leave them like that. We will see. Bernt: Well, Caleb, it doesn't look like we are going to come to full agreement tonight. Probably going to have to continue this dialogue to next week most likely. But what do we need to plan for for next week, so that we are prepared for a continued discussion? Hood: Mr. President, I would put that back on you. I -- I feel except for maybe some tweaks to a letter -- and, again, if you have some language send that to me and I will take the letter, but I'm not planning on sharing anything -- if you could just review it and come prepared to discuss and -- Bernt: Perfect. Hood: -- if you want to give me a heads up on any changes that might make it run a little smoother to priority numbers and, then, I can make some notes or whatever. But you tell me what you need. I'm not planning on really doing much else, just listening to the dialogue next week and getting ready to ship that letter off, so -- Bernt: Caleb, I don't believe we need anymore presentation. What I will ask Council to do is go over this and if you do want some, you know, dialogue in regard to certain items, then, maybe shoot that to Caleb and -- and have that discussion and maybe give him a heads up, so that the discussion next week can go quicker and then -- and, then, if we could look over the letter and offer up any type of, you know, changes or whatever to Caleb in the meantime, so that we can have that prepared for Caleb to be finalized next -- next Tuesday. Strader: Mr. President. One thing I would just like -- that I think would help me with touching on the city's willingness to fund future projects or advance funds for future projects is if there is just some background information that someone has prepared or some kind of information how that would work or like an example of a city doing that, just Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 27 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 24 of 26 because I'm new and I haven't seen that and don't fully understand it, that would really help me. Bernt: Yeah. That's great. So, we have actually done that as a city in the past. I believe we allocated some funds for the overpass for Locust Grove and so -- I don't remember what that was -- for the right of way -- I'm talking about amount seven and eight hundred thousand dollars -- Nary: One point eight million. Bernt: How much? Nary: One point eight million. Bernt: One point eight. I was a little -- I was only off a million bucks. So, we -- we have allocated some funds in the past to expedite a project. It's not something that we are foreign to. But when it comes to right of way, I -- Councilman Cavener nailed it right on the -- right on the dot. So, we -- those are things that we would not get paid back for. What it -- what we would receive is -- is connection, you know, more -- it's quicker. Quicker connection. Our project would be more of a priority to ACHD, although that -- that project also includes ITD as well, so they are a hair more complicated. But could move us to the top or get the project going quicker. Strader: Thank you. I think I understand. Is there a distinction between when the city is buying the right of way versus other things you might advance funds for? It sounds like for right of way we are not going to get reimbursed, but the other things potentially we could; is that right? Bernt: Right. I believe that -- I believe that that -- that could be part of the discussion. I don't know if we -- I'm -- I'm not familiar with the times we have -- where we have paid -- or offered funds to expedite a project, other than right of way with the Locust Grove overpass. So, I did have this discussion with the Mayor last week in our meeting on Friday asking him about a different stretch of road and I did ask him if we were to widen it could we get paid back from ACHD and I don't think that he had an answer then. So, maybe we just -- maybe that -- I don't-- to be honest, I don't know the complexities, I don't know the specifics of how that would work. Perreault: Mr. President. I don't want to speak for the Mayor, but it's my understanding that it was just -- it was an idea that he was working on to -- to -- to loan those funds to ACHD for projects that were already in the five year plan to move them up maybe three or four years. So, it would be something that is already in the -- in the -- the financial plan for the next five years. So, like let's say it was planned for 2025, but we did it in 2021, because at that point in time we could create a contract where we already knew the funds were --where it's going to be dedicated in 2025, but it would --that was my understanding of his initial -- but it was -- it's just something I think he is working on as a concept and it's not been done in the past, so -- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 28 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 25 of 26 Strader: Mr. President? Bernt: Mrs. Strader. Strader: Thank you. That helps. I think I'm confusing two different concepts then. So, apologize. So, I think that makes sense. I would be okay with touching on the city being open to that -- Bernt: Right. Strader: -- like subject to look at, you know, how much that would cost and we would, of course, do a lot of diligence on what would be worth it for us. E. City Council: Discussion Regarding Council Members Designated to Serve as Contact for City Areas F. Resolution No. 20-2189: A Resolution Approving City Council President's Appointments of City Council Members to Serve as Contact for Respective City Areas Bernt: Perfect. With that I believe we will go to the next item. So, my -- my item is not imperative -- it's not something that absolutely needs to get this discussed -- discussed at this moment. It's even a conversation that could happen offline, to be honest with you, so -- Cavener: Do you want to move it to later tonight? Bernt: Sure. Would that be possible, Bill? That -- Nary: Mr. President, as long as at the beginning of the meeting you make clear why you are adding it to the agenda at the last minute, that's all that's required by statute. Bernt: The beginning of the next meeting. Nary: Correct. Bernt: Okay. Is that okay with Council if we do it? Okay. Perfect. We will handle the resolution at that time as well. So, we do not have any executive session planned, so I believe we have come to the end of the meeting. Do I have a motion? Hoaglun: Mr. President, I move we adjourn. Cavener: Second. Bernt: We have a motion and a second. All those in favor say aye. Passes. We are adjourned. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 29 of 323 Meridian City Council Work Session March 10,2020 Page 26 of 26 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:47 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 3 / 24 /2020 PRESIDENT TREG BERNT DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 24,2020— Page 30 of 323 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 3.A. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item -Approve M inutes of February 25, 2020 City Council Work Session ATTACHMENTS: a Meeting Minutes Minutes 2/28/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 4 of 366 Meridian City Council February 25,2020 Page 40 of 40 Simison: All right. Do I have any other motions that someone would like to make tonight? Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I move that we adjourn the meeting. Hoaglun: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to adjourn the meeting. Any discussion? If not, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Those opposed nay. The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:57 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 3 / 10 / 20 MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 3.C. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item -Approve Minutes of March 3, 2020 City Council Work Session jab--- di ATTACHMENTS: loa Meeting Minutes Minutes 3/5/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 67 of 366 Meridian City Council Work Session March 3,2020 Page 52 of 52 Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I move that we move into Executive Session per Idaho Code 74-206(d) and (f). Hoaglun: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to move into Executive Session. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, clerk will call the roll. Roll call: Bernt, yea; Borton, yea; Cavener, yea; Hoaglun, yea; Strader, yea; Perreault, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (7:09 p.m. to 8:14 p.m.) Bernt: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Bernt. Bernt: I move we come out of Executive Session. Hoaglun: Second. Simison: Motion and second to come out of Executive Session. All those in favor? All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Bernt: Mr. Mayor, I move we adjourn. Hoaglun: Second. Simison: All in favor? Motion carries. Any opposed nay. Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:14 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 3 / 10 / 20 _ MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 3.D. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item - Burlingame Subdivision No. 1 Pedestrian Pathway Easement No. 1 ATTACHMENTS: loa Easement Exhibit 3/3/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 120 of 366 t ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-031 796 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=6 VICTORIA BAILEY 03/18/2020 09:21 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE Protect Name(Subdivision): Burlingame Subdivision No.1 Pedestrian Pathway No.1 j PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this low, day of �, 2020, between AMH Burlingame Development TRS LLC, hereinafter referred to as `Grantor", and the City of Meridian, an Idaho municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as"Grantee"; i i WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian desires to establish a public pathway; and WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to grant an easement to establish a public pathway and provide connectivity to present and future portions of the pathway; and WHEREAS, Grantor shall construct the pathway improvements upon the easement described herein; and NOW,THEREFORE,the parties agree as follows: THE GRANTOR does hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following property, described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing a public pedestrian pathway easement for multiple-use non-motorized recreation, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees that it will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees,brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED,by and between the parties hereto, that the Grantor shall repair and maintain the pathway improvements. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the easement hereby granted become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV.01/01/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 121 of 366 then, to such extent such easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that it will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hereinabove written. GRANTOR: AMH Burlingame Development TRS, LLC R Tyson Williams, Vice President, Construction STATE OF NEVADA ) ) ss. County of Clark ) This record was acknowledged before me on ikb(uoa 1(tt', 20209 by Tyson Williams, on behalf of AMH Burlingame Development TRS, LW, in his capacity as Vice President of Construction. (stamp) otary Signature �Q / Z3 MARL4IV DUMANCsa My Commission Expires: Notary Public-5tato 6f NeV • ADpoimtrnent No, 19'- •�t5 6� �y�tE�g5lres'f�1'$ MARIAN QUMANCAS .M Notary Public-State of Nevada s Appointment No.19-2915-01 My Appointment Expires OW&-2023 Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 1/1/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 122 of 366 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 3-10-2020 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk,respectively. (stamp) Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2020 Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 01/01/2020 EXHIBIT A Legal Description City of Meridian Pathway Easements Burlingame Subdivision No. 1 Easements located in the SE % of the SE % of Section 4, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: EASEMENT A A strip of land 5.00 feet in width, right of and adjacent to the following described easement line: Commencing at a Brass Cap monument marking the southwest corner of the SE % (S % corner) of said Section 4, from which a 5/8 inch iron pin monument marking the southeast corner of said Section 4 bears S 89017'10" E a distance of 2649.98 feet; Thence S 89°17'10" E along the south boundary of said SE % a distance of 1324.99 feet to the southwest corner of the SE % of the SE % of said Section 4; Thence N 0°41'27" E along said westerly boundary of said SE %of the SE %a distance of 53.00 feet to the BEGINNING POINT of said easement line; Thence leaving said boundary S 89017'10" E a distance of 78.76 feet to the ENDING POINT of said easement line. This easement contains 394 square feet (0.009 acres), more or less, and is subject to any other easements existing or in use. EASEMENT B Commencing at a Brass Cap monument marking the southwest corner of the SE % (S % corner) of said Section 4, from which a 5/8 inch iron pin monument marking the southeast corner of said Section 4 bears S 89d17'10" E a distance of 2649.98 feet; Thence S 89°17'10" E along the south boundary of said SE % a distance of 1324.99 feet to the southwest corner of the SE % of the SE % of said Section 4; Thence N 75001'44" E a distance of 196.04 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence S 89'17'10" E a distance of 5.14 feet to a point on a curve; Thence a distance of 5.01 feet along the arc of a 545.00 foot radius non-tangent curve right, said curve having a central angle of 0031'37" and a long chord bearing S 3013'44" E a distance of 5.01 feet to a point; Lzlf s61UtiD n:s ACHD Permanent Easements Land Surveying and Consulting Burlingame Subdivision No.1 Job No. 19-20 Page 1 of 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 124 of 366 Thence N 46055'39"W a distance of 7.42 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; This easement contains 13 square feet more or less and is subject to any other easements existing or in use. SPL N T HS Clinton W. Hansen, PLS E PG Land Solutions, PC Revised: October 24, 2019 11118 � I n(Z�t 111 s = <� 9TF 0 F \4P 5) ON W La!�of fAiDn5 ACHD Permanent Easements Land surveying and Consulting Burlingame Subdivision No. 1 Job No.19-20 Page 2 of 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 125 of 366 EXHIBIT B CITY OF MERIDIAN PATHWAY EASEMENTS BURLINGAME SUBDIVISION NO. 1 LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 4 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, B.M ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 0 Q 0 ENDING POINT BEGINNING POINT EASEMENT A POINT OF BEGINNING a EASEMENT A 7s.?s' EASEMENT B m S89'171O"E_ 13 SF S89'17'10"E 5.1, W U o N 394 SF p1 A�,�196.Q�•• N46'55'39"W 7.42' o 4 —�� N15.••• Z 1/4 1324.99' Z _ 1324.99' 4 3 g SW CORNER ss9't7'1D'E 2s4s.ss' WEST CHERRY LANE s 10 SE 1/4 SE 1/4 BASIS OF BEARING NOTE: EASEMENTS ARE 2.00 FEET BEHIND BACK OF SIDEWALKS. I CURVE TABLE CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA BEARING CHORD C1 5.01' 545.00' 0'31'37" S3'13'44"E 5.01' ,,�PL LA N4S 5� %S T R G� a. 11118 � `n,A1 L%4 11 �a2 2'F 0 IF 0 40 80 160 0% W.NP "La'n' and Surveying and Consulting 231 E.5TH ST.,STE.A MERIDIAN,ID 83642 (208)288-2040 (208)288.2557 fax www.landsolutions.biz JOB NO.19-20 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 126 of 366 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 3.E. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item - Burlingame Subdivision No. 1 Pedestrian Pathway Easement No. 2 ATTACHMENTS: All loa Easement Exhibit 3/3/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 127 of 366 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-031 971 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 03/18/2020 11:48 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE f i Protect Name(Subdivision): Burlingame Subdivision No.1-Pathway Easement 2 . I I j PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT ,1 THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of a ron , 2020, between { Yuriy Mukha, hereinafter referredV to as "Grantor"; and the City of Meridian, an Idaho municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as"Grantee"; i WITNESSETH: I WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian desires to establish a public pathway;and WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to grant an easement to establish a public pathway and provide connectivity to present and future portions of the pathway; and WHEREAS, Grantor shall construct the pathway improvements upon the easement described herein;and NOW,THEREFORE,the patties agree as follows: THE GRANTOR does hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following property, described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing a public pedestrian pathway easement for multiple-use non-motorized recreation, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees that it will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures,trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED,by and between the parties hereto,that the Grantor shall repair and maintain the pathway improvements. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the easement hereby granted become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV.05/31/19 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 128 of 366 then, to such extent such easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that it will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hereinabove written. GRANTOR: Yu 'y Mukha r STA /OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on -,21 , 2020, by Yuriy Mukha. (stamp) \\` !�gECCY PMc�q������� Nota Signature o�t �8��•. My Commission Expires: MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 8-16-2024 iC'02j S'TgTF OF IOP. '`�lb�� �11N 1 111 Iig \\\\\ Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 05/31/19 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 129 of 366 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison,Mayor Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO ) . ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 3-10-2020 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk,respectively. (stamp) Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2022 Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 05/3 1/19 EXHIBIT A Legal Description City of Meridian Pathway Easement- Off-site Pathway Burlingame Subdivision No. 1 An easement located in the SE '/4 of the SE '/4 of Section 4, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a Brass Cap monument marking the southwest corner of the SE % (S '/4 corner) of said Section 4, from which a 5/8 inch iron pin monument marking the southeast corner of said Section 4 bears S 89017'10" E a distance of 2649.98 feet; Thence S 89°17'10" E along the south boundary of said SE % a distance of 1324.99 feet to the southwest corner of the SE Y4 of the SE '/4 of said Section 4; Thence continuing S 89°17'10" E along the south boundary of said SE '/4 of the SE 1/4 a distance of 334.35 feet to a point; Thence leaving said boundary N 0°37'45" E a distance of 39.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence N 89'17'10" W a distance of 139.54 feet to a point; Thence a distance of 14.03 feet along the arc of a 545.00 foot radius non-tangent curve left, said curve having a central angle of 1°28'28" and a long chord bearing N 2°45'18" W a distance of 14.03 feet to a point; Thence S 89'17'10" E a distance of 140.39 feet to a point; Thence S 0°41'36" W a distance of 14.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This easement contains 1959 square feet (0.045 acres), more or less, and is subject to any other easements existing or in use. O�PL LA NO Clinton W. Hansen, PLS g�� Land Solutions, PC Revised: October 24, 2019 11118 <, 9TF C F �T0N W Burlingame Subdivision No. 1 L ih7 bILijtiains Surveying and Consulting Job No.19-20 Page 1 of 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 131 of 366 EXHIBIT B CITY OF MERIDIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT OFF-SITE PATHWAY BURLINGAME SUBDIVISION NO. 1 LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 4 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, B.M ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 0 S`\V8O HOUSE Y SO'41'36"W 14.00' J S89_1710_'E _140.39___ POINT OF = U s:.,FUTURE SIDEwAUC�z=.-;:: .::::...:.: BEGINNING F- 1959 SF N89'17'10"W 139.54' — ) c o 4 �13241/4 334.35' 0 4 3 9 SW CORNER S89'17'10"E 2649.98 WEST CHERRY LANE 9 10 SE 1/4 SE 1/4 BASIS OF BEARING CURVE TABLE CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA BEARING CHORD C1 14.03' 545.00' 1'28'28" N2'45'18"W 14.03' U oNp.L LA N,S g5\ G1ST R G,P L 11118 � �'�, ►o�Z�(�19 .ro Z �j�TTFOF �� ��� ON W•NP 0 40 80 160 La n nlutions Land Surveying and Consulting 231 E.STH ST.,STE.A MERIDIAN,ID 83642 (208)288-2040 (208)288-25S7 fax www.landsolutions.biz JOB NO.19-20 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 132 of 366 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 35. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item - Caven Ridge Estates West Subdivision No. 2 Pedestrian Pathway Easement ATTACHMENTS: a Easement Exhibit 2/28/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 133 of 366 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-031797 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 VICTORIA BAILEY 03/18/2020 09:21 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE j Protect Name(Subdivision): j Caven Ridge Estates West Sub No.2 i j PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this l day oMQ1h, 26?Q , between AMH Development LLC hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", and the City of Meridian, an Idaho municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as"Grantee"; WITNESSETH: i WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian desires to establish a public pathway; and WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to grant an easement to establish a public pathway and provide connectivity to present and future portions of the pathway; and WHEREAS, Grantor shall construct the pathway improvements upon the easement described herein; and NOW,THEREFORE,the parties agree as follows: THE GRANTOR does hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following property, described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing a public pedestrian pathway easement for multiple-use non-motorized recreation, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees that it will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures,trees,brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED,by and between the parties hereto, that the Grantor shall repair and maintain the pathway improvements. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the easement hereby granted become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV.01/01/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 134 of 366 then, to such extent such easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that it will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hereinabove written. GRANTOR: STATE OF 4&WID ) CIt'4 V ) ss County of A& ) This record was acknowledged before me on �ob3,w-7a (date) by!it Zn lw,t II(LM S (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of 4AAH ppv¢Ianrrtr<n'lt a C (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: 0,�p ptoQ %t4it tic' (type of authority such as officer or trustee) (stamp) Notary Signature My Commission Expires: C �3 ti���er ref MARIAN DUMANCAS ��.%.. Notary Public-State of Nevada Appointment No,19-2915-01 My 4poirtlmant Expires 08-18-2023 rer,o� Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 03/26/18 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 135 of 366 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison,Mayor Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO, ) : SS. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 3-10-2020 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk,respectively. (stamp) Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2022 Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV.01/01/2020 J-U-B COMPANIES r1 LTH ANODON Q MAPPING GROUP INC. J•U•B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT"A" CAVEN RIDGE ESTATES WEST SUBDIVISION No.2 INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT An easement being that portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 30,Township 3 North,Range 1 East,Boise Meridian, City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest section corner of said Section 30, from which the west quarter corner of said Section 30 bears South 00'25'44" West,2642.97 feet along the west line of said Northwest Quarter; Thence South 16'00'26"East on a random line, 735.12 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence S 89°34'16" E,25.00 feet; Thence S 00°25'44"W, 131.31 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve; Thence along said non-tangent curve to the left an arc length of 57.84 feet,having a radius of 68.50 feet, a central angle of 48°22'35", a chord bearing of S 24°37'02"W and a chord length of 56.13 feet; Thence N 02'1 TO 1" W,42.79 feet; Thence N 00°25'44"E, 139.78 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING,containing 3,704 square feet or 0.09 acres,more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of Robert L. Kazarinoff, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null andvoid. ly L Robert L.Kazarinoff,PLS 16642 gti0 �� S SLR o c0 Date O qT OF 0ot. L. KA�' 11/22/2019 Page 1 of 1 a 250 S.Beechwood Avenue Suite 201 Boise ID 83709 p 208-376-7330 w www jub corn Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 137 of 366 EXHIBIT "B" 24 19 0 50 100 27 I S Scale in Feet �3S2 , Point of Becinning 0) L1 Elock 1 N 26 � 1 N i Ingress / Ecress Eosement c � C3 u> N N 0 29 - 25 24 0 V -j 26 I vi 3C � S; 2t tC :f'. c�ly p,�ve Coven Ridge Estctes West Subdivision No. 2 S2 0 7] w U; Line Icble Line # Ui,ection Length D a L1 S;69'34'16"E 2b.UC:' 3 L2 SU0"2t;'44"W 131.31' L3 NO2'15'01"W 42,/9' J� o L4 NUU 2t'44"E OF 3 IS T KA1 11/22/2C19 Curve Icble Curve # Lengtf Kcdius Ueltc Chorc Becring Chorc Lengtl- x� C1 5/,84' 6d.bG' 48'22'35" S24'3/'02"W 56.13' s.9 o o REUSE OF DRAWINGS FILE:ID-16-122_LOT 26 INC ESS EGRESS r THIS DOCUMENT,AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS INCORPORATED HEREIN. JUB PRDJ.p:iD-18-122 AS ANINSTRUMENT I.PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IS THE PROPERTY OF II•Y V!T I L�f�1�T�T M E N T I l$€T2 J-U-B ENGINEERS,Inc.AND IS NOT TO BE USED,IN WHOLE OR PART, DRAWN BV:JRE v FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN DESIGN BV: 9 AUTHORIZATION OF J-U-B ENGINEERS,Inc. 1 of 1 CHECKED BY:RLK Located in the NW1/4 S.30,T.3 N., RAE.,B.M. 6 1-U-B ENGINEERS,INC. o NG REVISION DESCRIPTION BY APR DATE ity Council Meetin Agenda March 16;ibu2bI%e0djp,i%"gg6ty, Idaho CAE I�iAIv ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 3.G. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item -Turf Farm Subdivision No. 1 Pedestrian Pathway Easement ATTACHMENTS: loa Easement Exhibit 3/3/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 139 of 366 i ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-031802 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=6 KRISTINA LOWRY 03/18/2020 09:22 AM I CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE Proiect Name(Subdivision): Turf Farm Subdivision No. 1 PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT i THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of �a� 20ZQ, between Brighton Development Inc, j hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", and the City of Meridian, an Idaho municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as"Grantee"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian desires to establish a public pathway; and WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to grant an easement to establish a public pathway and provide connectivity to present and future portions of the pathway; and WHEREAS, Grantor shall construct the pathway improvements upon the easement described herein;and NOW,THEREFORE,the parties agree as follows: THE GRANTOR does hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following property, I described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing a public pedestrian pathway easement for multiple-use non-motorized recreation, with the free right of access to such . jfacilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees that it will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures,trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that the Grantor shall repair and maintain the pathway improvements. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the easement hereby granted become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV.01/01/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 140 of 366 then, to such extent such easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that it will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hereinabove written. GRANTOR:Brighton Development Inc. �L By: Robert L. Phillips, Chief Operating Officer STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on (date) by Robert L. Phillips (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of Brighton Development Inc. (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: Chief Operating Officer (type of authority such as officer or trustee) (stamp) skv, / J SHARI VAUGHAN Notary Signature Notary Public-state of Idaho My Commission Expires: (Q,— OZ >Qq Commission Number 20181002 My Commission Expires Jun 1,2024 Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 01/01/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 141 of 366 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO, ) . ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 3-10-2020 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk,respectively. (stamp) Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2022 Pedestrian Pathway Easement REV. 01/01/2020 km E N G I N E E R I N G February 17,2020 Turf Farm Subdivision No.1 Project No.19-102 Legal Description City of Meridian Pathway Easement Exhibit A A parcel of land for a City of Meridian pathway easement situated in a portion of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 33,Township 3 North, Range 1 East,B.M.,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap marking the Southwest corner of said Section 33, which bears S00°13'37"W a distance of 2,676.15 feet from a found aluminum cap marking the West 1/4 corner of said Section 33,thence following the westerly line of said Southwest 1/4,N00°13'37"E a distance of 830.83 feet; Thence leaving said westerly line,S89°4623"E a distance of 1,080.06 feet to an existing City of Meridian pathway easement(Instrument No.2018-086641,records of Ada County,Idaho)and the boundary of Hill's Century Farm Subdivision Phase 10 (Book 115, Pages 17,301 through 17,304, records of Ada County, Idaho) and being the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence following said easement and boundary,N45*00'37"E a distance of 14.00 feet; Thence leaving said easement and boundary,S44"56'12"E a distance of 285.00 feet; Thence S45.00'37"W a distance of 14.00 feet; Thence N44°56'12"W a distance of 285.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 3,990 square feet,more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights- of-way of record or implied. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is made a part hereof. a �12459 OF 2 •1'1 •?•d2� 9233 West gre"&"�%41eh6 Alpla-V roch'q92 2 9 Pageer43lof 366 32 FOUND ALUMINUM CAP W 1/4 CORNER SECTION 33 33 MER\60P 1 A C��c'�g�N�g66�1 `/ EXyS-0A JN\*r 2 01 to - LO N45°00 37 E Bicentennial Farm \ 14.00' z 6 Subdivision No. 1 I` 10 N t S89°46'23"E 1080_06' (TIE) cn --- \� � w \ w p i�I , POINT OF BEGINNING \ s cii ``�I DO cn �2 o CO o n Z Hill's Century Farm Subdivision Phase 10 Proposed '��\ \�• `ram Turf Farm SOS dyj Subdivision/ \ �4', No. 1 \ �y/Ar S45'00'37"W sP/ 14.00' U � `QtoQosea\ �co\C�r�`N°odor Unplatted o . ry 0 N N w 32 33 E. Lake Hazel Rd. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 5 4 FOUND ALUMINUM CAP N SW CORNER SECTION 33 Q 3 a w a w 3 0 50 100 200 Q a N Plan Scale E N G I N E E R I N G m 9233 WEST STATE STREET = BOISE,IDAHO 83714 PHONE(208)639.6939 Exhibit B kmengllp.com Turf Farm Subdivision No. 1 z a DATE: February 2020 PROJECT: 19-302 SHEET: City of Meridian Pathway Easement 1 OF 1 S 1/2 SW 1/4 Sec. 33, T3N., R1E., B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, ID a Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 144 of 366 2 s d s 6 00 12e 2 s6 8so 12ri O Title: City of Meridian Pathway Easement 19-102 Date: 02-13-2020 Scale: 1 inch=35 feet I File: Tract 1: 0.092 Acres: 3990 Sq Feet:Closure=n00.0000e 0.00 Feet: Precision>1/999999: Perimeter=598 Feet 001=n45.0037e 14.00 003=s45.0037w 14.00 002=s44.5612e 285.00 004=n44.5612w 285.00 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 145 of 366 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 3.1-1. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item - Final Order for Caldera Canyon (H-2019-0147) by Vanessa Klaus, Located at 1294 E. Leigh Field Dr. 9&M .0- ATTACHMENTS: Description T loa Order Findings/Orders 2/27/2020 Exhibit A Exhibit 2/27/2020 Exhibit B Exhibit 2/27/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 146 of 366 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 2020 FINDINGS APPROVAL DATE: MARCH 10, 2020 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT ) CONSISTING OF 16 BUILDABLE ) CASE NO. H-2019-0147 LOTS AND 4 COMMON LOTS ON ) 2.83 ACRES OF LAND IN THE R-8 ) ORDER OF CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT FOR ) APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT CALDERA CANYON SUBDIVISION ) BY: VANESSA KLAUS ) APPLICANT ) This matter coming before the City Council on February 25, 2020 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 1 I-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of"PLAT SHOWING CALDERA CANYON SUBDIVISION, LOCATED IN LOT 7 BLOCK 31 OF QUENZER COMMONS SUBDIVISION NO. 10, BOOK 96, PAGE 11987 LYING IN THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE '/4 OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR CALDERA CANYON—FP, ALT H-2019-0147 Page 1 of 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 147 of 366 CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2020, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 2/13/20,by SEAN P. SULLIVAN, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 3," is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated February 25, 2020, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked"Exhibit A" and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Penelope Riley, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked "Exhibit B" and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR CALDERA CANYON—FP, ALT H-2019-0147 Page 2 of 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 148 of 366 issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight(28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the loth day of March , 2020. By: Robert E. Simison Mayor, City of Meridian Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon the Applicant,Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 3-10-2020 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR CALDERA CANYON-FP,ALT H-2019-0147 Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY N -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING 2/25/2020 Legend RUT DATE: IffProject Lacfl-fiar tl TO: Mayor&City Council RUT RUT iH UT� R�b FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner M r R-9 6 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton,Development M1 RU Services Manager R28 208-887-2211 R1 —RUT SUBJECT: H-2019-0147 C-N Caldera Canyon—FP,ALT Ri ® =R T L- LOCATION: 1294 E. Leigh Field Dr.,in the NE 1/4 of I Section 31,TAN.,R.IE. (Parcel � LI T R- #R7288710130) RUT R=7S L-O I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat consisting of 16 building lots and 4 common lots on 2.83 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district; and Alternative Compliance to UDC 11-313-7C.3b,which requires street buffers to be landscaped with a minimum density of one tree per 35 linear feet.As an alternative to the 7 trees required in the buffer(based on 240+/-linear feet),the Applicants requests approval for the 32 existing arborvitaes within the buffer area to satisfy the tree requirement. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Owner: Vanessa Klaus— 1294 E. Leigh Field Dr.,Meridian, ID 83646 B. Representative: Penelope Constantikes, Riley Planning Services—PO Box 405,Boise,ID 83701 III. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the preliminary plat as required by UDC 11-6B-3C.2. There is the same number of buildable lots and common open space as shown on the approved preliminary plat. Therefore, Staff finds the proposed final plat is in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. In regard to the request for Alternative Compliance to UDC 11-3B-7C.3b, Staff finds the proposed alternative means of compliance provides a superior means for meeting the requirement based on the Findings in Section VII. Pagel Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 150 of 366 IV. DECISION Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat and alternative compliance with the conditions of approval in Section VI of this report. V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(date: 2/14/2020) PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR CALDERA CANYON SUBDIVISION LOT 7, BLOCK 31 OF QUENZBR COMMONS SUBDIVISION NO. 10 s LOCATED IN THE SE 114 OF THE NE 114 OF SECTION 31 0 TAN, RJE., BY, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2019 PROJECT SITE DEVELOPMENT FEATURES F uu[x u, wmwoe maenu%x�xe r .. ".. m V d s. 1 = I I 131GUENGSETBACM VoRRT MAP $ LEGEND FEMA D NOTE ly r a Fv f Qs °y�S 0 ao3 d Q 6 S <�R Is l .eR aaaw rt. 9yi m.4p.. � BENCH d1ARR8 U)ATDac NAVD 86) J.t Fl �m owl s €€ __ _ _ _ � pay 4� u N € � �4 l NOTES. ,o o I �g m o, F R.aaWu� N.HERITAGE VIEWAVEv �MXe1V'up' »o,f»�•^••• SHARED GRNEWAY ,.,....rma. Page 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 151 of 366 B. Final Plat(date: 2/13/2020) FINAL PLAT N,wrzm u r dCLi11 xE c cn�tA CANYM� - LOx]f♦ELTLtf]t OF WFNZFA COWONS SLRPY19tfYl N0.10.ROON 96 PA(£1193] "Z tC 31�3M6EIek rs'OF TRTMrs IN TE SE1/5 W NE xE1/4 W%Ct,°x 31,10WNSHP a NQAV.RANCE t tA$t.� `�N"""b x.�xcr m iam[I:rrlr�un,w mm MEWHAN,OT MEFUMAN.AOA CQUIITY,LUNG tnwe�pst�s a�irnro�ie en me�lx�eu^e�x io�ry.Ian x ms 2020 w x r � m Is>iS,NOtp OALI9MI M0.I T.;IM, R x _M xAN A&lm LS 7009 wr oto>H Ovnn[a� N�*Aaer t�uexC xpc orn,E¢9 _ Se9-15'20"E 578.]9' ME CON,LW�.BLOW31 �•.srcuma __ _ 9 w1 rw owT mF,x TaTa uwxo-w NoY w.rcT.m pj Laxuxc w-rs-x..a ° --- ---- -7,1 4Js)-T w—Tm1. c.w waze unuxs,rReFo,Tr nw..r3 ei l l'1 1 / 33.' t15R 1 Q o� Iit ! � I I• I I I� I � � I °>?a.9¢t•cx��mr��ieTTO�wIm,�nta�i urn Iasps9.N m le. —T.oT.ors<z m e�nm rm cra"c rs rxate,En aeaT rox�nr z L--- J LS 598'i4'33'E ._____ I 1�$ $I �.'--R:-- pLoor x T ]890 LS'leg°Lam'_ Llo NI fie[„ cw.,.rear...rieTrcct v.ec 9ecu,twt nmeee 40.W' '1' s¢1 Nore r---------1 E iLbIX.vno � I a Ioea.eAx. I ..._. ;s ea Txa rem'•own. ..._.._ ..._n_n, i �'_ rs�«1Twour,u.Lrocalc 1C Imo____......_- 1 S erw'2p E O6.FA' L1 1 pOfrex Sato e�i oxNitw Kx,:q xrx e[ Cm,�mlam[wwu a[ I I 0 fml tn,s t��,•anat+.0 i m�Noai�m ear T,raxw.1ne.co xm 1 1 e.soc n`ea n .u j -----1A F--------� Y r---------1 fsrscwti:x opc=T ti A R....�aicnpr tio-s oww wox ! I -t r�E1 i i �i..I � I $r g J � j i ..srn csr.,v,�s For na.eecx.mr„o r�.,.w..r,•a tx rr�r.,.me wi 13i 91 1$ M HHE �. r rcAw.w§I r 1. aeoeKz mI a1 + &da"Kx � ` WE s,AnN e� eE.�x f I o- lu I f BLOCR 7 I - dtl L+47E$&J'L�Y� � I L___ J I� �. s Mmr x ,Iwu a.oT,N.r xar RmLr FRCH nrnRe m¢oeaalF aF mT 1 I ¢I I I 1 1 I 1f¢� I I I ✓�13 I r_________, � nl o_.N-B _ -_o� ❑ �I S §I� ��" �� - - —— - - s ea,rrwor-yl.,. I n eB'1e'm'w 9RON � S � >• �I I �+p 1 I I new I�t Llne n , LS D. ',.. s i' LI. L___� _ J _ _ cmpnx. f r' -----, i 4 I 49-SG-- -- ------ FUND Eaeemen[un* g lfl 1 i�+. r 1 :.0 Purr Easrmm!W.e 1 1 _ —_ E •-:�I - ^^ 1rsn Cmer iummornM t EOsenwr Slxewk Eosem ttrcr w: I r F-d Aluminrvm Cw IRa Motad] Q a�...3.Bg1�3T�€�8-...� 1 I J I �1 Found 5/8'Iron PI.(A.Nated) iwnM 1 2 Iron Pln in a ! i 9vvey Cuntmr Pone.(Aa rvotm� i �. 3 f `y�] • Sea 1/2 PLS PLS Inen Iron an ,raa DISIWC 20'MOE I AI Q r :23.50' 23.50' ` • ei 3/S men Iron tan ,3tA6 I P119 EA„f11E]IT(2] I I I lo'i � I I,aI T: i° , If°'1 QI L.1 nreroer r... _ _._ _ _._.._.. _ La � :C�st�•c 'E N s.��d2o E.RaR EAV 1/4 r -�N c xu -pit-�--- O - *� -- SEcnox n __K�y _�� _SHIL I RaY,, a _ u s_ esaae' cPas Ixsr. 1 9 $ HO CAP � F-fE16H FISEDDR. SEE M l" �CUR.LAT'l.I)LgON 3, 7. WERTFe N89'46'ZO"W 37&.' (11) 'Rf'a.gxLLd y,�llttRrfr xa.9 aox " ttxel REF£RENaE122— OAVI�EVANS NAF2RATIVE:: w tg .ao mlmw C n.&. e. MIS SI,gpIMYON PLAT WAS YAOE AT THE REQUEST OF VANESSA MAE Porce Line TQ6e (,'plyQ TOb1! IS B1T3W.�k 6yM G. 10-A.VS Au°RANT T.S AND THE RHPO3E OF T MSDIHS1ON IS TO LFEATE R CDNn6URATOH a TIE LOi3 SHONN NEPEO,eENrEW TIE EYrs✓P Length p rect on A+rm 11 LmVth ROOF- OnitO Chord Di-t+n Shad Length SU9°IH31°N VOTES FCR MME CLARITY AND ExPLANATOre L1 y.'Fp S83•eg7O'E C1 I,Q15' Sears' maR3Y SM'3CRTA' 11R13 g qZS. OF 9EAfRING: - MIS FA9 OF REARING Fora TIIS PRAECr IS NOIY31'MT L2 ST,2y' nOO'1s'W'E C2 a¢rAY a6.00' tQ'!'112x' N86733V'C fT.11' SE CORNER 26WOW FEET� EN THE Fd eFASS CAP MARNNS mclO U, TI E"CORER N OF SFCNDN"' T.a M„ 1)O of Tn Imt.Ha IOSORSOIeg wo w5r.NO SHEET ar 3 TIE FOUND K INUM CAP MAMNC THE iARi 5/A friSNER { eed2)lLurm Owrrmme Srppj. m No-10.Seak 93 Pvpe 1107 Kiln" SUN SfL11dI -87-Oi F.fAL Pill— Page 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 152 of 366 C. Landscape Plan(date: 2/14/2020) LAN V SCAPE FLAN FOR CALDERA CANYON SUBDIVISION LOT 7, BLOCK V OF QUEVER COMMONS SUBDIVISION NO. 10 e LOCATED IN THE SE i/4 OF THE NE 114 OF SECTION V T4N, RJE., B.M. ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2019 °,m; 90 :J YBIONTRIMMEIMDSCAPINU @ a 2 I. �. € � al O FLVTT BCRE➢ULB 9KRUB nAN77NC NOM -------------- S'TALLYUMHNCE BBENM'OOARBRTTCHOBAM BLUEBEAR➢BMN➢LU➢NIOKT ROSA➢OUBLE SNOCBOUT PINK ➢ARBEM-OWARP G01LDLN a '� ¢acx�aw enoxn.vevo 1 1 Page 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 153 of 366 D. Common Driveway Exhibit Approved with Preliminary Plat diEA slnE - DR VE N+kY t: LQT 9, -----5.--I f—" — g , Y-------- I BLOCK 2 TO BE LOCATED _ ON THE OPP051 TE 51DE OF 20 THE 94ARED COMMON tr' 4 DRIVE P RTY0" 00 a I I I 1 1 �-- ��_"— — --- J L I —FRONY r------------ # ENVELOPELU PI ODNIh-10N-7-i 4 FRONT fROMT SrOl! -- LOT 6,@LACH 2*M1 NON-8111LGASLE -- COMMON LOT WITH a BLANKET IWAES51 EGRfS5EkSIMUffINI I I I I I 1 s 3 FAVOR OF LOTS d,7,1A& j fIf I I f 1 I �0 Y 1T,BLDCK2 j ' I M I Iv' —���-- � 1 F 5 �a � j MVEWAYFOR LOT 5, F I I 1 5• I I Z I BLOCK 7 TO OE L DCATED _ Ow THE OPPOSrrE SIDE OF L_ _____--J THE StIAREOCDhIhdON REAR "' REAR DP.IVEFMPERTYLINE ; � r ; 40 a 20 40 so S ALE IN FEET 1"=40' OALDERA CANNON SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO IROCK L.ID CIVIL SHARED DRIVEWAY EXHIBIT *:I W0 N-t Vd lad D—iop SMlrt€oKsuhiM1� 27orxh @7qh 96—k A Jn7w OMQS Aicww 4100�3VLW77 xNnv.-disdkJdA—m VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development [AZ-05-063 (DA#106064914); PP-05-063; FP-06-020; H-2019-0062]. 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of City Council's approval of the preliminary plat(by August 6,2021), in accord with UDC 11-6B-7 in order for the preliminary plat to remain valid; or, a time extension may be requested. Page 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 154 of 366 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat shown in Section V.B prepared by David Evans &Associates,Inc., stamped on 2/13/2020 by Sean P. Sullivan, shall be revised as follows: a. Note #2: ". . . This plat is within the Nampa Mer-i Settler's Irrigation District, all lots within . . ." b. Note #4: "Building setbacks and dimensional standards in the subdivision shall be in compliance with Title 11,City of Meridian Unified Development Code in effect at the time of issuance of building permits ' side - ^r'' sethaeks a-ad 'n' f et# yard sethaeks anle c. Note#5: Specify that the 5 foot easement applies to interior side yard lot lines. d. Note#10: "Portions of Lots 13 and 14,Block 20. . ." e. Add a note for the 10-foot wide PUID easements along rear lot lines, the subdivision boundary and adjacent to any street. f. Add a new note stating that this development recognizes Section 22-4503,Idaho Code, Right-to-Farm and include the code section. g. Add a new note: "The bottom elevation of structural footings shall be set a minimum of 12-inches above the highest established normal groundwater elevation." h. Add a new note: "This development is subject to the terms of a Development Agreement with the City of Meridian recorded as Instrument No. 2019-104970." i. A 20-foot wide street buffer in a common lot is only required on the portion of Lot 2, Block 2 that abuts E. Leigh Field Dr.; leave the remainder as part of the buildable lot. j. The ACHD storm water drainage easement depicted on Lot 13,Block 2 shall be relocated to the right-of-way consistent with that depicted on the Irrigation Plan on Sheet 2. k. The line types for the sidewalk easement and PUID easement line are too similar;use a different line type for one of these easements. One(1)full-size copy of a revised final plat shall be submitted prior to signature on the final plat. 5. The landscape plan shown in Section V.0 prepared by Rock Solid Civil, dated 5/10/19, shall be revised as follows: a. A 20-foot wide street buffer in a common lot is only required on the portion of Lot 2,Block 2 that abuts E. Leigh Field Dr.; leave the remainder as part of the buildable lot. b. Depict fencing along the back edge of the street buffer along E. Leigh Field Dr.; along the south side of Lot 13 and the north side of Lot 7, Block 2 adjacent to the 5' landscape strip along the common driveway; and along Lot 14, Block 2 to distinguish common from private areas as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7. c. The Applicant shall contact the City Arborist at 208-888-3579 to confirm any mitigation requirements for trees proposed to be removed; any mitigation required shall be depicted/noted on the landscape plan. One(1)full-size copy and one(1) electronic copy of a revised landscape plan shall be submitted prior to signature on the final plat. Page 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 155 of 366 6. Future homes constructed in this subdivision shall comply with the conceptual building elevations included in the development agreement. 7. Submit a revised common driveway exhibit with lot numbers that coincide with that depicted on the final plat. 8. The 5-foot wide landscape buffer along the south side of Lot 13, Block 2 adjacent to the common driveway shall be completed when N. Heritage View Ave. is extended to the north and the temporary turnaround easement is no longer needed prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the future home on that lot. 9. Prior to the issuance of any new building permit,the property shall be subdivided in accordance with the UDC. 10. A perpetual ingress/egress easement for the common driveway shall be filed with the Ada County Recorder,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved 11. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer,the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster, Sue Prescott, at 887-1620 for more information. 12. Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall be required to establish a new water and sewer services directly to the existing mains in E. Leigh Field Drive for Lot 12,Block 2, and abandon any existing services per the Meridian Design Standards. Due to the size of the existing structure on Lot 12,Block 2, and the potential for increased demand on this lot, a one-inch single service/meter will be required. 2. Independent sewer and water services lines for each lot shall be required in the common driveway Lot,Block 2 in lieu of mainlines as proposed. General Conditions: 3. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department,and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 4. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 5. All improvements related to public life,safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. Page 7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 156 of 366 6. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff,the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 7. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 8. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 9. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City.The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 10. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life,non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 11. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 12. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 13. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 14. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 15. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 16. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 17. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 18. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 19. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and Page 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 157 of 366 approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 20. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 21. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2" x I I" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 22. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 23. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non- domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 24. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 25. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(MCC 9-1-28.C.1).The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 26. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. VII. FINDINGS A. Alternative Compliance 1. Strict adherence or application of the requirements are not feasible; or Although strict adherence to the standard in UDC 11-3B-7C.3b which requires trees in the street buffer is feasible, it would necessitate removal of many existing healthy arborvitaes. Page 9 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 158 of 366 2. The alternative compliance provides an equal or superior means for meeting the requirements; and Staff finds the proposed alternative means of compliance provides a superior means of meeting the intent of UDC 11-3B-7C.3b. 3. The alternative means will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or impair the intended uses and character of surrounding properties. Staff finds the proposed alternative means of compliance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or impair the intended uses and character of surrounding properties. Page 10 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 159 of 366 EXHIBIT B From: Penelope Riley To: Sonya Allen;dkernerCa)rocksolidcivil.com Cc: Chris Johnson Subject: RE:Caldera Canyon-FP H-2019-0147 Staff Report for Feb.25th Council Mtg Date: Friday,February 21,2020 3:32:17 PM Attachments: imaae006.Dna ATT00001.txt ATT00002.htm Importance: High Thank you, Sonya! The project team concurs with the conditions of approval for Caldera Canyon Preliminary Plat and have no objection to being placed on the consent agenda. Thank you! Penelope Constantikes Principal P.O. Box 405, Boise, ID 83701 208.908.1609 On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 21:57:27 +0000, Sonya Allen <sallen@meridiancity.org> wrote: Penelope— please submit a written response to the staff report right away if you'd like to this item to be placed on the consent agenda. thanks From: Sonya Allen Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 4:26 PM To: Adrienne Weatherly<aeatherly@meridiancity.org>; Charlene Way<cway@meridiancity.org>; Chris Johnson <cjohnson@meridiancity.org> Cc: 'Penelope Riley' <penelope@rileyplanning.com>; Derritt Kerner (dkerner@rocksolidcivil.com) <dkerner@rocksolidcivil.com> Subject: Caldera Canyon - FP H-2019-0147 Staff Report for Feb. 25th Council Mtg Attached is the staff report for the proposed final plat for Caldera Canyon.This item is scheduled to be on the City Council agenda on February 25th. The hearing will be held at City Hall, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, beginning at 6:00 pm. Please call or e-mail with any questions. Penelope - Please submit a written response to the staff report to the City Clerk's office (cit)lclerk(@meridiancity.org) and me by 3:00 pm the Thursday prior to the meeting. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 160 of 366 If you are in agreement with the conditions of approval contained in the staff report and you submit a written response accordingly, your item will be placed on the consent agenda; consent agenda items are passed in one motion by the Council at the beginning of the meeting. Note: If you are in agreement with the staff report, it is still recommended you attend the meeting in the event the item is pulled off of the consent agenda for discussion. If you do not respond to the staff report by Thursday at 3:00 pm, or if you have concerns with the conditions of approval, your project will be placed on the regular agenda. Thanks, Sonya Allen I Associate Planner City of Meridian I Community Development Dept. 33 E. Broadway Ave., Ste. 102, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-884-5533 1 Fax: 208-489-0578 II D u,.ago Built for Business, Designed for Living 0®©0 0 All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in regards to both release and retention,and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 161 of 366 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 3.1. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Edington Commons (H-2019-0109) by G20, LLC, Located at 3610 N. Linder Rd. ATTACHMENTS: Description T loa Findings Findings/Orders 2/26/2020 Exhibit A Exhibit 2/26/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 162 of 366 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI DIAN:-, AND DECISION& ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Annexation of 14.56 Acres of Land with an R-15 Zoning District; and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 92 Building Lots, 11 Common Lots and 4 Other Lots on 13.49 Acres of Land for Edington Commons Subdivision,by G20,LLC. Case No(s). H-2019-0109 For the City Council Hearing Date of: February 25,2020 (Findings on March 10,2020) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 25,2020, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 25,2020, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 25, 2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 25, 2020,incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67, Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian,which was adopted April 19,2011,Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR EDINGTON COMMONS—AZ,PP H-2019-0109 - 1 - Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 163 of 366 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 25,2020, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Annexation with R-15 zoning is hereby approved with the requirement of a Development Agreement; and Preliminary Plat is hereby approved per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of February 25, 2020, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I- 6B-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-651 IA. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR EDINGTON COMMONS—AZ,PP H-2019-0109 -2- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 164 of 366 agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28)days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52,Title 67,Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of February 25,2020 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR EDINGTON COMMONS—AZ,PP H-2019-0109 -3- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 165 of 366 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 10th day of March 2020. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED AYE COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED ----- MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 3-10-2020 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR EDINGTON COMMONS-AZ,PP H-2019-0109 -4- EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY N -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING February 25,2020 �! DATE: Legend �1IProject Location TO: Mayor&City Council ® ® ffiff) :.. OUR FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton Development p Services Manager - , 208-887-2211 ® ,, SUBJECT: H-2019-0109 s'- Edington Commons LOCATION: 3610 N. Linder Rd. i I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Annexation&zoning of 14.56 acres of land with an R-15 zoning district; and Preliminary plat consisting of 92 building lots, 10 common lots and 4 other lots on 13.49 acres of land in the R-15 zoning district. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 13.49 Future Land Use Designation MDR(3-8 units/acre) Existing Land Use Rural residential/agricultural Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family residential Current Zoning RUT in Ada County Proposed Zoning R-15 Lots(#and type;bldg/common) 92 building/10 common/4 other Phasing plan(#of phases) 2 phases Number of Residential Units(type Single-family attached and detached of units) Density(gross&net) 6.83 units/acre(gross)& 11.64 units/acre(net) Open Space(acres,total[%]/ See Analysis, Section V.3 buffer/qualified) Amenities Children's play structure,climbing dome, swings,climbing rocks&seating area Page 1 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 167 of 366 Physical Features(waterways, Coleman Lateral runs across the northern boundary of this site hazards,flood plain,hillside) Neighborhood meeting date;#of July 9,2019;no attendees except Applicant attendees: History(previous approvals) None B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report Yes (yes/no) • Requires ACHD No Commission Action es/no Fire Service • Distance to Fire 2.4 miles from Fire Station 43 (can meet the response time requirements) Station • Fire Response 4 minutes(under ideal conditions) Time • Resource 82%from Fire Station#3—meets the target goal of 80%or greater Reliability • Risk 1 (residential)(current resources are adequate to supply service) Identification • Accessibility Does not meet all required access,road widths&turnarounds;development is limited to 30 building lots for both phases until a secondary access that meets IFC is built&approved by MFD.See additional comments in Section VIII.C. • Special/resource Doesn't require an aerial device needs • Water Supply Requires 1,000 gallons per minute for 1 hour(may be less if building is fully sprinklered) • Other Resources NA Police Service • Distance to 4.5 miles Police Station • Police Response 4:01 minutes(priority 3) Time • Calls for Service See comments in Section VIIID • Accessibility See comments in Section VIIID • Specialty/resourc See comments in Section VIII.D e needs • Crimes See comments in Section VIII.D • Crashes See comments in Section VIIID West Ada School District Page 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 168 of 366 • Distance(elem, Paramount Elementary— 1.2 miles(enrollment at Hunter Elementary is ms,hs) currently capped); Sawtooth Middle School—0.3 mile;Rocky Mountain High School— 1.4 miles • Capacity of Paramount Elementary 650; Sawtooth Middle School 1,000;Rocky Schools Mountain High School 1,800 • #of Students Paramount Elementary 7"645; Sawtooth Middle School '� 1,044; Enrolled Rocky Mountain High School 2,475 • Anticipated 74 schoolaged children generated by this development Wastewater • Distance to 0-feet _ Sewer Services • Sewer Shed White Drain Trunkshed • Estimated 92 Project Sewer ERU's • WRRF 13.78 MGD Declining Balance • Project Yes Consistent with WW Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts& None Concerns Water • Distance to 0-feet Water Services • Pressure Zone 2 • Estimated 92 Project Water ERU's • Water Quality None • Project Yes Consistent with Water Master Plan • Impacts& Provide water easement in shared drive(Block 1,Lot 21)for potential Concerns connection of parcel to the east.A second water connection for redundancy shall be required to the water main in Linder Road through the walking path between lots 13 & 14(Block 2). Page 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 169 of 366 1 1 I - • - • III •■off •�-=-T.���� Legend ME N.own ITS --"on Project Loc ON IN mossmilim IN ofion ■■u■s ��om �uu i i ~J + � I I R o ul■■- _ ■aI I ' I II I�+ ♦ Y•Ilm nugl m 1►�I I�II,♦ �LI■■11 ���+�111111 Ilglllll ' � �g:�'al■ C � .�� -�iYllllr 11 1 s r - �--ram � I�=�' iin 14• = pq : .�V IYii111 � ♦Ali: � +' *III==-- W� ■rn■ � � �� II7111 1 -.:7?I„ 1_'I - • - e ,1..■In■ / �i� i�■- -::` long ' ° -.......U,S;TICK Il�ll US- son Ilk. II-:: - ■ - s nun:.. ��I=��- r I•i--■unnu■■r■■..umnun■ �� - pu►luun■■uar�:■■■uun■n■1 ��■nn:`������lW Illlle- p--v■n■■q■uuuugn+ l:■nn■q■��I��� UND ..■ate+sA►i���i�■s►R■. ♦i� ♦�---■■ 4 i-- a , 1� f�- �=(IIIII ♦♦ ,M♦ ��■uu �\' ■ 1■ 11■1 11 ■ 1■ 11■1 11 -iii 1■i _ _ i�i: 1■i • 1■1 1■■ �Y■••N■■1 unnu 1■1 1■■ �Y■••••■■1 unnu 1■ Ypuw lNf■■■- 1■ puw �'■lNf■■■- IS E-1111 111 _ uw� pauu p ■ uu_ p•uu p ■ 1 1■11- W N .INI �IIIIIII ■ � 1 1■!. I N .INI �IIIIIII ■ ■-Il: INII -iN I III it l=Ill INII -iN I III illly. i¢-III IIII II I � i§- xl xl III IIII II !• -- xl ---1511151� � � - xl ---1511151- 1110 * ■■■1■■■■ ■■■ Nn■■• N 1■ �1111� •■■■1■■■■ ■■■■1■N■■■�� 1J in- NO �1 :i i ■ �_=.- IIII': :i i 1■■■■ �� � IIII' = 1511 -i�'�= 1511 ■ -- 2 IIIIIII 1 151 Nor ' ■■■■N• ��'�= IIIIIII I 151111111 :■■■■1 1 ��: =F- 111151111 IIII IIIII :■■■■1 1 �� - ONF Z. 111151111 IIII IIIII 1` - w uu■u - : - 1■ - ■■■ !! uuw 11-- ---' 'ME -- ■• ■■■■N■ ■ - -- ■• ■■■■N■ ■ ■■■■■■■1■■■ �•----' -- - 1�■■■■■1■■■ - - 1■ � ■ 'P-1■1 �2 � ■ 'P-1■1 :�2 I 1 ■1 ■■N■ • ■ ■■1■■■■■■1■ 1■ IIIN IIII_- ■1 ■■N■ • ■ ■■1■■■■■■1■ 1■ - II�N.1"1-_- :i ■ uuw gun 1?i�:.. 1 :i ■ ■unnu gun 1?i�:.. ^1 S, - r r��`•-� - I - IIIII : iii • • 11 i on �♦ i �• i C. Representative: Laren Bailey,Devco Development,LLC—4824 E. Fairview Ave., Boise,ID 83706 IV. NOTICING Planning&Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper Notification 11/15/2019 2/7/2020 Radius notification mailed to properties within 300 feet 11/12/2019 2/4/2020 Public hearing notice sign posted 11/22/2019 2/14/2020 on site Nextdoor posting 11/12/2019 2/4/2020 V. STAFF ANALYSIS A. ANNEXATION&ZONING Comprehensive Plan(https://www.meridiancity.org/compplan): This property is designated Medium Density Residential(MDR)on the Future Land Use Map(FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan. The MDR designation allows smaller lots for residential purposes within City limits. Uses may include single-family homes at gross densities of 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The proposed single-family homes and gross density of 6.83 units per acre is consistent with the MDR FLUM designation. Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this application and apply to the proposed use and development of this property(staff analysis in italics): • "Provide for a wide diversity of housing types(single-family, modular,mobile homes and multi-family arrangements)and choices between ownership and rental dwelling units for all income groups in a variety of locations suitable for residential development."(3.07.03B) The proposed mix of attached and detached units will contribute to the diversity in housing types in the northwest portion of the City. Staff is unaware if the proposed units will be owner occupied or rental units. • "Provide housing options close to employment and shopping centers."(3.07.02D) The proposed development will provide housing options in close proximity to the existing and future employment and shopping centers along the Chinden Blvd. and Ten Mile corridors. • "Require open space areas within all development."(6.01.01A) Qualified open space is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3.As proposed, the development does not meet the minimum qualified open space requirement. • "Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is contiguous to the City."(3.01.01F) Urban services can be provided and this development is contiguous to the City. • "Restrict private curb cuts and access points on collectors and arterial streets."(3.06.02D); Access is proposed via the adjacent arterial street; there are no stub streets to this property and access is not available via a local street. Page 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 171 of 366 • "Require pedestrian access connectors in all new development to link subdivisions together to promote neighborhood connectivity as part of a community pathway system."(3.03.03B) There are no pedestrian connections proposed to adjacent properties other than sidewalks along stub streets; Staff recommends a segment of the City's multi-use pathway is constructed along the northern boundary of this site adjacent to the Coleman Lateral in accord with the Pathways Master Plan as noted below. • "Require pedestrian access connectors in all new development to link subdivisions together to promote neighborhood connectivity as part of a community pathway system."(3.03.03B) Other than sidewalks along public stub streets, no pedestrian connections are proposed to adjacent properties. Below staff recommends that the applicant construct a 10 foot multi-use pathway along the south side of the Coleman Lateral to promote neighborhood connectivity and safe pedestrian access to the school to the north. One of the many goals of the Comprehensive Plan is to proactively address conflicts between incompatible uses. This property currently abuts C-C zoned property on the south boundary. The applicant is providing a stub street for vehicular connectivity but the neighborhood as designed doesn't integrate with the mix of commercial uses currently approved for the commercial property(Sugarman).With a previous development application(Alpina Townhomes) on the subjeet Sugarman property,it was the desire of the Commission to have the two properties develop uniformly to ensure a true mix and integration of uses in this area. Staff recommends that the Commission determine if the proposed single family development provides an adequate transition to the mixed use designated property development to the south. Zoning: Based on the analysis above, Staff is of the opinion the requested annexation with the R- 15 zoning district and proposed development is generally consistent with the MDR FLUM designation and is appropriate for this site. The proposed annexation area is contiguous to City annexed property to the north and south and across the street to the west; and is within the Area of City Impact Boundary(AOCI). A legal description for the annexation area is included in Section VII.A. The City may require a development agreement(DA)in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-651 IA. In order to ensure the site develops as proposed with this application, staff recommends a DA as a provision of annexation with the provisions included in Section VIII. B. PRELIMINARY PLAT Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There is an existing home and several accessory structures on this site. These structures are required to be removed prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer for the phase in which they are located. Dimensional Standards (UDCL1-2): The proposed plat and subsequent development is required to comply with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-7 for the R-15 zoning district. The proposed plat complies with these standards. Page 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 172 of 366 Subdivision Design&Improvement Standards(UDC 11-6C-3): The proposed subdivision is required to be designed and improved per the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3 which include but are not limited to streets, driveways, common driveways, easements,and block face. The proposed plan complies with these standards. Phasing Plan: The subdivision is proposed to develop in two(2)phases. The first phase will include 44 building lots. Access(UDC 11-3A-3,11-3H- /Streets: One(1)access is proposed via N. Linder Rd., an arterial street,at the northwest portion of the site;two (2) stub streets are proposed for future extension to the south and east. Development is limited to 30 building lots until such time as a secondary access that meets International Fire Code(IFC)is built and approved by the Fire Dept. Traffic: A Traffic Impact Study was not required by ACHD for the proposed development. Common Driveways (UDC 11-6C-3 : All common driveways are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. Four (4)common driveways are proposed that comply with UDC standards. Common driveways should be a maximum of 150' in length or less,unless otherwise approved by the Fire Dept. An exhibit is required to be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks,fencing,building envelope and orientation of the lots and structures.Driveways for abutting properties that aren't taking access from the common driveway(s) should be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line away from the common driveway. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited unless separated by a minimum 5-foot wide landscaped buffer. A perpetual ingress/egress easement for the common driveway(s)is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment.A copy of the easement should be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat. Signage should be provided at the ends of the common driveways on Lots 6 and 22,Block 1; Lot 7,Block 2; and Lot 15,Block 5 for emergency wayfinding purposes as requested by the Fire Department. Parking(UDC 11-3C): Parking for single-family dwellings is required based on the number of bedrooms per unit.For 1- and 2-bedroom units,a minimum of 2 spaces are required with at least one of those spaces in an enclosed garage, other space may be enclosed or a minimum 10' x 20' parking pad. For 3-and 4- bedroom units, a minimum of 4 spaces are required with at least 2 of those spaces in an enclosed garage, other spaces may be enclosed or a minimum 10' x 20' parking pads. For 5+bedroom units, a minimum of 6 spaces are required with at least 3 in an enclosed garage,other spaces may be enclosed or a minimum 10' x 20' parking pad. Because of the proposed reduced 27-foot wide street sections (W.Windswept Dr. and W. Woodpine St.),parking is restricted to one side of the street only; and narrow building lots (i.e.32'+/-)with 20'wide driveways,the amount of available on-street parking is limited. This has historically created issues with not enough on-street parking available for guests and residents due to residents using their garages for storage rather than parking; and people parking on both sides of the street where parking is restricted to only one side blocking access for emergency vehicles. Page 7 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 173 of 366 To address this issue,the Applicant has submitted a parking exhibit included in Section VII.F that depicts a total of 50 available on-street parking spaces. Staff is concerned this is sufficient; if the Commission and/or City Council does not feel it's sufficient,they should require the provision of wider street sections to accommodate parking on both sides of the streets,wider building lots,and/or additional parking spaces in common areas.Because more parking will be able to be provided on the south side of W. Windswept Dr. vs. the north side where building lots are proposed, Staff recommends parking is solely provided on the south side of the street and parking is prohibited on the north side as proposed. One side of the street where 27-foot wide street sections are proposed should be signed"No Parking". Pathways(UDC 11-3A-8): Pathways are required to be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8 with landscaping on either side of the pathway(s)per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C. The Pathways Master Plan depicts a segment of the City's multi-use pathway in the general area near the northern boundary of the site for pedestrian access from the development to the east(Woodburn West)to the on-street pathway along Linder Rd. and the school to the north. Therefore,the Park's Dept. recommends as a DA provision that a pathway is provided on the south side of the Coleman Lateral on this site.Inclusion of a pathway will also allow this area(i.e.Lot 1,Block 1)to count toward the qualified open space requirement which does not meet the minimum standards as proposed.This pathway would eventually extend to the east to the existing pathway in Woodburn West development when the abutting property to the east redevelops for interconnectivity and safe pedestrian access to the school to the north. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-17): Sidewalks are required to be constructed adjacent to public streets as set forth in UDC 11-3A-17. A 5-foot wide detached sidewalk was recently constructed with the road widening along Linder Rd., an arterial street; minimum 5-foot wide attached(or detached)sidewalks are required along internal local streets as proposed. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-17): Parkways are required to be constructed and landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3A- 17E, 11-3B-7C and 11-3G-3B.5. Eight-foot wide parkways are proposed along the entry street and within common area"end caps". Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): Landscaping is required to be provided in accord with UDC standards as follows: • A 25-foot wide street buffer is required along N. Linder Rd., an arterial street,in a common lot(s)and landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C; • Landscaping is required on either side of pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-12C; • Landscaping is required within parkways as set forth in UDC 11-3A-17E, 11-3B-7C and 11-3G-313.5; and, • Common open space is required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3E. Landscaping is proposed within the street buffer along Linder Rd. and within most common open space areas in excess of UDC standards. No trees are depicted along the micropath between Lots 13 and 14,Block 2; landscaping should be provided in accord with UDC standards(or Page 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 174 of 366 apply for alternative compliance if an easement exists). The total linear feet of parkways and required&provided number of trees should be included in the calculations table on Sheet L2 of the landscape plan in accord with the minimum standards in UDC 11-3B-7C. Qualified Open Space(UDC 11-3G): Based on the overall development area which consists of 13.49 acres of land, a minimum of 10% (1.35 acres)qualified open space is required to be provided within the development per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B. An open space exhibit was submitted as shown in Section VII.D that depicts 2.02 acres(or 15%) of open space for the development consisting of a half-acre park exceeding 50' x 100', common areas with parkways along the entry street and parkways within"end cap"common areas adjacent to streets, a micro-path lot,half of the arterial street buffer along Linder Rd. and the common lot where the Coleman Lateral is located at the north boundary of the site. Some of the open space depicted on the exhibit does not count toward the"qualified"open space standards set forth in UDC 11-3G-3 as shown in the second exhibit in Section VII.D (see hatched areas),primarily consisting of the area along the north boundary where the Coleman Lateral is located.Without this area,the development does not meet the minimum standards. Therefore, Staff recommends a 20-foot wide common lot is added along the north side of the building lots in Block 1 adjacent to the lateral outside of the irrigation easement containing a 10-foot wide multi-use pathway with 5 feet of landscaping on either side of the pathway in order for this area to qualify and comply with the minimum open space standards.In order for open space to qualify toward the minimum requirements it must improve the livability of residential neighborhoods,protect natural amenities, be accessible by all residents of the development and be located in areas of high visibility to avoid hidden areas and corners, dark areas, unusable space and reduce the opportunity for crime as set forth in UDC I I- 3G-1, 11-3G-3 and 11-3G-3D. Qualified Site Amenities(UDC 11-3G): A minimum of one(1)qualified site amenity is required to be provided for this development based on the size of the development(i.e. 13.49 acres). The Applicant proposes the following amenities in excess of UDC standards: a children's play structure,a swing set, seating benches,climbing rocks, climbing dome and a micro-path(see Section VII.D). Existing Trees: There are several(i.e. 6+/-)existing trees on this site that are proposed to be removed with development. Mitigation information is included on the landscape plan; (151)2- inch caliper trees are proposed for mitigation in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B- 10C.5. Waterways(UDC 11-3A-6): The Coleman Lateral runs along the northern boundary of this site within a 40-foot wide easement and is proposed to be left open as linear open space. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing constructed on the site is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A- 7. Fencing is proposed as follows: a 6-foot tall solid vinyl privacy fence is proposed along the west, south and east boundaries of the development; a 5-foot tall black wrought iron fence is proposed along the rear of building lots adjacent to the canal along the north boundary of the development; and a 4-foot tall black wrought iron fence is proposed around the common area where children's play equipment is proposed near the entry of the development in accord with UDC standards. Page 9 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 175 of 366 Utilities (UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is proposed. Street lighting is required to be installed in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. See Section VIII-B below for Public Works comments/conditions. Pressurized Irrigation System(UDC 11-3A-1 : An underground pressurized irrigation system is required to be provided for each lot within the development. Storm Drainage(UDC 11-3A-18 : An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed single-family attached and detached units as shown in Section VII.E. Building materials consist of a mix of siding(horizontal and vertical lap siding and board&batten)with stone veneer accents; colors are very monochromatic. The single-family attached structures are required to comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual; single-family detached structures are exempt from this requirement. All SFR homes along the west perimeter boundary of the development adjacent to N. Linder Rd. are proposed to be a single-story in height. To ensure eaves are constructed on homes for aesthetic as well as drainage (i.e. keeping water away from the foundation) reasons, Staff recommends a DA provision requiring all homes within the development be constructed with minimum 1-foot wide fire rated eaves on all four sides.For variety in appearance of the structures, Staff recommends a cohesive color scheme is used for the overall development featuring a minimum of two field colors, a trim color, and an accent color or unique material. Garage door colors should coincide with this scheme or other accents. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Annexation&Zoning and Preliminary Plat applications with the conditions included in Section VIII per the Findings in Section IX. Further, Staff recommends the plat,landscape plan and qualified open space exhibit is revised per the conditions in Section VIII prior to the Commission's recommendation to Council on this application. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on December 5,2019 and January 16, 2020.At the public hearing on January 16',the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing: a. In favor: Hethe Clark, Clark-Wardle,Applicant's Representative; Julie Ann Domingo; Serena Ormsby Alvarez; Stave YaRyap; Peng Cheng; Laren Bailey;Justin Cranny, Hawley Troxell,representing the Lester&Betty Vogel Trust; Dennis Green; Tina Folden Page 10 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 176 of 366 b. In opposition:None c. Commenting: Steven Lloyd d. Written testimony: Whitney Montgomery,Kelly Woodhouse,Michele Anderson, Chem Garpetti (in support); letter from Laren Bailey,the Applicant,to Steven&Andrea Lloyd,the property owners to the east, agreeing to limit the height of homes to a single story adjacent to their property on Lots 20 and 23-26, Block 1;Jake Centers,Blackrock Homes; Justin Cranny, Hawley-Troxel representing Lester&Betty Vogel Trust& Hethe Clark,Applicant's Representative(in agreement w/Commission's recommendation) e. Staff presenting gpplication: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons 2. Key issue(s) testimony a. Support of proposed development from homeowner's in other subdivisions by the same developer; 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. The possibility of"floating"the Mixed Use designation on the property to the south to the southern portion of this property and adding a commercial or multi-family component to enlarge the mixed use area and provide a transiton and integration of uses from the residential to the future commercial uses to the south; b. Staff recommendation for 4-sided eaves and a cohesive color scheme to be provided for the overall development featuring a minimum of two field colors, a trim color, and an accent color or unique material and garage doors coinciding with this scheme or other accents; c. The provision of an emergency access to the site that meets Fire Dept. reugirements; d. The location of the micro-path along the east side of the site providing a connection between the multi-use pathway and the common driveway and it not being visible from the public street creating police surveillance concerns; e. The provision and alignment of a 10' wide multi-use pathway and qualified open space along the northern boundary of the site and location of existing easements; f. The availability of on-street parking for guests and whether or not reduced street sections should be allowed and their impact on on-street parking; g_ Impact of the development on area school enrollment,which is currently over capacity, and the School District's request for no homes in this development to be occupied until 2021 which Pleasant View will be open and the cap on Hunter Elementary will be lifted. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Strike condition#A.1 c which requires a cohesive color scheme to be used for the overall development featuring a minimum of two field colors,a trim color,and an accent color or unique material with garage door colors coinciding with this scheme or other accents —design review should not be required for single-family detached homes; b. Strike condition#A.1 d which requires minimum 1-foot wide fire rated eaves to be constructed on all 4 sides of homes within the development. 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. The Commission would like direction from City Council as to whether or not there should be a policy requiring 4-sided eaves to be constructed on homes within the Cit,Y the Commission generally preferred the appearance of eaves on homes but because they aren't required by Building Code or City Code they were hesitant to require them through the Development Agreement. If Council determines eaves should be required, condition#A.1 d should be re-instated. Page 11 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 177 of 366 b. The Commission requested the Council consider if the proposed development in itself provides an adequate transition to the mixed use designated parcel the south and what could be done about making sure the commercial piece doesn't get blocked in. C. City Council: The Meridian City Council heard these items on February 25,2020.At the public hearing.the Council moved to approve the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing a. In favor: Hethe Clark,Applicant's Representative:Tina Folden: and Dennis Green b. In opposition:None c. Commenting:None d. Written testimony: Hethe Clark,Applicant's Representative(in agreement with the Commission's recommendation): Bill Cassinelli e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Support of proposed development from homeowner's in other subdivisions by the same developer. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Whether or not eaves should be required to be constructed on homes in the proposed development: b. The relocation of the common area with the micro-path currently depicted mid-block in Block 2 to the south end of the same lot as a buffer between the residential lot and future commercial uses to the south- C. The extension of the multi-use pathway to the sidewalk along Linder Rd. on the school site to the north: and. d. The School District's request to restrict the issuance of building permits until such time as schools currently under construction in the area are operating to assist in easing overcrowding of existing schools. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation. a. Include restriction that no building permits be issued for residential homes within the development prior to January 1.2021 (see DA provision#A.1 f in Section VIIII: b. Include a requirement for the common lot with the micro-path located mid-block in Block 2 to be relocated to the south end of the same block as a buffer to the future commercial uses to the south(see conditions#A.2c and AM in Section VIII). C. Per the Applicant's proposal to pipe the Coleman Lateral where it crosses the northern boundary of the site. Staff modified condition#A.3e in Section VIII to remove the fencing requirement between the pathway and the waterway and remove the depiction of the waterway from the plan. Page 12 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 178 of 366 VII. EXHIBITS A. Annexation&Zoning Legal Description and Exhibit Map 5awtooth Land Surveying, LL.0 -A&, 2030 5.'Nashington Ave. 1044 Northwest Blvd.,Ste.G 4 4 1 1'Avenue cast f Emmett, Ip$36 J 7 Coeur d'Alcne, ID 113814 Jerome,IV 63336 (208)398-8I 04 P!(208)714-41544 P:{209}329-5303 F:(208)398.8105 F.(208)292-4453 F-(208)324-5521 Annexation Legal Description (,._r, ) A parcel of land being a portion of the W1/2 SWI/4 SWi/4 of Section 36,Township 4 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian,Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as Follows: BEGINNING at the S1/16 corner common to Sections 35 and 36,from which the southwest corner of said Section 36,bears South 00°14'51"West, 1318.78 feet distant,- Thence South 88056'15"East,coincident with the north line of the SW1/4 SW1/4 of said Section 36, a distance of 272.69 feet; Thence South 71002'05"East, 415.82 feet to the east line of the W1/2 SW1/4 SW1/4 of said Section 36; Thence South 00°17'40"West,coincident with said east line, 863.19 feet to the southeast corner of the N1/2 SW1/4 SW1/4 SW1/4 of said Section 36; Thence North 88046'08"West,coincident with the south line of said N1f 2 SWI/4 SW1/4 SW1/4 of Section 36, a distance of 655.89 feet to the west line of said SW1/4 SWIj4 of said Section 15; Thence North 001114"51"East, coincident with said west line, 989.08 feet to the Point of BEGINNING. The above described parcel contains 14.564 acres, more or less. BASIS OF REARING for this description is South 001114'51"West, between the 51/16 corner common to Sections 35 and 36 and the southwest corner of Section 36,Township 4 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian. �It ZAaAi n 1 Q v Ift P:12019119161-EOINGTON PLACE ALTA-CMG1SurveylDrawingslDescriptions119161-Annexation Leila 1.daax.docx. Page i1 Page 13 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 179 of 366 AIVNEXAMN LEGAL EXHIBIT POINT of BEGIi@7NNG 5lj3fi CIORMFR SEL naw 35&36 1 1 I � 1 �I 1 •�a *14.564 ACRES ai M $I I �n I 1 I I � I M.LA 5F=Pi CORNER 0 ' It11S5CAP d� O1�Z+14 p 35 39 6 5 S OF 2 I W.flSTICfCRD. 1"-200` PROJECT., ONNERI &OPER: 2030 S. WASHINGTON AVE. bwc �rrvt;T�ry PLACE GG EMMEM 10 83617 19161-EX 4624 W FAIRVIEWAVE. P: 208 398-8I04 PROACV& SUSDrV ION BOISE,+083roc • F. �200 398-8105 19161 swim swim or SECTION 36 (20)336-5355 T.4 Ikl,,R. ? W..6.M. sN�r PATE: 812212019 t I , ry: LLG WWW cSAWT-00THLS.CCM I OF 1 Page 14 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 180 of 366 B. Preliminary Plat(date: 12,13,12019 1/8/2020)&Phasing Plan REVISED � �——�——� M1� ,�gejC�al ��j^�¢egplg¢ i •z� ' €��¢e . ++ w. e 1 I'L k I I E y r � - - O a C RoiI I I i c !s S. e 5} Ii 1 . 1 "1 EOINGTON PLACE SUBDIVISION 3616 N.CINDER ROAD,MERIDIAN,I❑ : �yonolo 3- PRELIMINARY PLAT �^'� -wm.w....a�.. Page 15 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 181 of 366 �y SeeXi5�9]..pp � 6 6 I q G--�cyy yy 4& d -�� I k P�--_----------- ' F"Jik C s u IL 1 I itr � SM 5 2t a 8.. 1 • , - � p m •,u' I py1 • v a i - .,v �gv JA l }hY WCOCNF[f Sr � H Cw s+ ��� 9 .1 1 8 < 9 Iy{ I■{ a 'y a w a 8 g I eu glrt n• � R qv $ l i x �— M •��,I i s[— S— a g— � �c $ se s �—_a #p H i I d of , I �f yy I $ �C 3 I 4 x •me' xer aat u vv' xm ^I a ���•: I aaw @ ooe.x d' LN ;IK 1 1 I ¢� a[e wm' xm •�✓ m 4•b I II P� R" .. I I a II I sm .ua • 4>tl " $ .I. n 81 I $ y ■ p� � N yI 17 , ,� 1 yy_ Y x• 1 �1 I 61 CG el III 9" I l y i r uoe v Yes':6'oe' Q IYIL EDINGTON PLACE SUBDIVISION C—CW 31TE IV- pw � � WORKS 3616 N.UNDER ROAD,MERIDIAN,I❑ ° e .gym eowuo 'R z g 2 LOT DIM ENS ION S^ mnax-si. Page 16 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 182 of 366 C. Landscape Plan(date: 11,118,12019 January�U5 2020) REVISED 3 m O 4 � a�e - 1 r M1�NI I do II a � _ o Page 17 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 183 of 366 3 m G 2 I i w4Nwosxaroerh- Asa n 19 19 r2 t z :...: + ---- -- -- - ;A,^ m I ra�c i a Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 184 of 366 F11 n n x = - s vi - m k _ wwwlsrFTmive - - k 13 ^�^� Y. - w wbooaesT ST - t, I 4F a � EDINGTON PLACE SUBDIVISION �$ __-- r 3610 N.UNDER ROAD, MERIDIAN, ID i n f PRELIMINARY PLAT LANDSCAPE PLAN Page 19 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 185 of 366 M__ 77 Y P i f _ Ol mots", z - -- - - - - uti - - ----- ---- --- - --- - - - Ff y -__ ^F_ _ = EDINGTON PLACE SUBDIVISION - _� 3610 N.CINDER ROAD, MERIDIAN, ID n k = PRELIMINARY PLAT LANDSCAPE PLAN rsIla Page 20 - Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 186 of 366 D. Qualified Open Space Exhibit & Site Amenities REVISED lu I I 4 f T - + _ I F 1 I I I I 1 I I I I O n I " oz I + M m �z 1 �6 ra iJ_ 6 Y its .i $ r Pao eo y A 3 Page 21 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 187 of 366 Proposed Amenities: a Large Half-Acre Park-The half-acre park will contain the following recreation facilities: - Play Structure - Swing Set r - Seating Benches - Climbing Rocks - Climbing dome Attractive Landscaping and Pedestrian Pathways L t- . -- . - Nib- Page 22 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 188 of 366 E. Conceptual Building Elevations(Single-Family Attached/Detached)—REVISED Axorl- slim IL .l r - _ 1 Page 23 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 189 of 366 F. On-Street Parking Exhibit s rn O i CD z a -p CD o ) C] x N 0A rn V a m - � � X 7 p f 1 a C w •. a " z v � d n - ro A - z z i '•• •. 0 3 ; W � Staff Note: Because W. Woodpine St. (the middle east/west street)is only a 27-foot wide street section, parking is restricted to only one side of the street which reduces the parking count by 2; 3 additional spaces can be accomodated along one side of W. Woodpine St. where it stubs at the east boundary adjacent to common area,resulting in an overall total of 50 on-street spaces. Page 24 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 190 of 366 G. Letter from West Ada School District Pertaining to Multi-Use PathwaX F1Man 1/1 32020 1 2-M PM Yochum Joe <Yochum.Joe@westada.org> RE.Sawtooth Middle School Pathway To IGmberly Warren Cc LarenElailey Hi Kim West Ada School District is agreeable to the proposed pathway across the south edge of the Sawtooth Middle School campus contingent on the following; 1. WASD Board of Trustees approves the pathway easement 2. Developer pays for all costs associated with the pathway(legal fees,construction,fencing,etc.) 3. Developer agrees to fence off the pathway from the rest of the SMS campus in order to force users to exit the pathway onto the sidewalk along Linder Road Thank you Joe N n a x z SAW TOOTH MIDDLE SCHOOL n y \ — T➢ Tb— — TUE— TB- -T3 --- LIra— i IE 14 r'F� RI r ,Ca `r a 6 I 1 TB �— 1❑ __�4�'v_ ��rA_—Tg � '�C � 111A $r rg. ra +a f 13 14 15 17 Is I 4 EDINGTON SUBDIVISION REGIONAL PATHWAY EXHIBIT Page 25 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 191 of 366 VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. A Development Agreement(DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance,a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum,incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat,phasing plan, landscape plan and conceptual building elevations included in Section VII and the provisions contained herein. b. All single-family attached structures shall comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual.An application for Design Review shall be submitted and approved for all attached dwellings prior to submittal of building permit applications. used erall development eat g a of two field eolvi"T, ca tr-im eeler, and an aceent eeler-or-unique material. Gar-age door eelers shall eeineide with this sehemeor-other- nts El. All hemes within the development shall be eenstf+ieted with minim-Um 4 feat wide fire r-a4ed eaves on all feiff sides e. All homes along the west perimeter boundary of the development adjacent to N. Linder Rd. and on Lots 20 and 23-26,Block 1 shall be restricted to a single- story in height as proposed by the Developer. d. A minimum 10%(1.35 acres)qualified open space shall be provided with development of this site as set forth in UDC 11-3G-3 in accord with the conditions of approval of the preliminary plat. e. A 10-foot wide multi-use pathway within a 14-foot wide public use easement a*d 20 feet wide een*nea lot with a minimum 5-foot wide landscape strip on each side of the pathway,landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-313-12C shall be provided along the south north side of the Coleman Lateral outside of the Irrigation District's easement. Five foot wide!andseape stfips shall be provided on eitheF side of the patl+way4hat The pathway shall extend from the east boundary of the site to the sidewalk along N. Linder Rd. The pathway may extend across the Sawtooth Middle School property to the north as shown on the exhibit in Section VIII.G if the provisions noted can be met: otherwise, the pathway shall be provided on the subject property. £ No building permits shall be issued for residential homes within the development prior to January 1,2021. Page 26 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 192 of 366 2. The preliminary plat included in Section VII.B, dated 12/3/19, shall be revised as follows: a. Depict., mininium 20 feet wide eommon lot at ther-ear of building lots i Bloev i adjacent to the Coleman Lateral for a multi use pathway and assoeiated landseaping. b. Relocate Lot 21,Block 1 to between Lots 17 and 18 or Lots 18 and 19,Block 1 in order to provide an access near the east end of the linear open space to the north as required by UDC 11-3G-3B.Ie; the common lot shall be a minimum of 15-feet wide. c. Relocate the common area with the micro-path depicted mid-block in Block 2 to the south end of the same block; include landscaping adjacent to the pathway in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C. 3. The landscape plan included in Section VILC, dated 11/18/19, shall be revised as follows: a. Depict trees and landscaping along the micropath between Lots 13 and 14,Block 2 in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C. b. Include the linear feet of parkways and required&provided trees in the calculations table on Sheet L2 of the landscape plan in accord with the minimum UDC standards. of the Coleman Later-a!eentaining a 10 feet wide miditi use pathway and 5 feet wide- landseape strips en either-side of the pathway landseaped per the standards in UDC 11 313 12G. d. Relocate the common lot(Lot 21,Block 1)with pathway and landscaping to between Lots 17 and 18 or Lots 18 and 19,Block 1 so that the multi-use pathway required to the north along the waterway is accessible at each end as required by UDC 11-3G-3B.1e; landscaping is required along either side of the pathway as set forth in UDC 11-3B-12C. e. Dep}et-a 6 feet tall vffeught i eo fence b between to 4 e�pathway d the djaeent c c-irr'ccrcr'uJ ucm cnc-cc uccns The Coleman Lateral shall be piped as proposed by the Applicant;remove the depiction of the open waterway from the plan. f. Relocate the common area with the micro-path depicted mid-block in Block 2 to the south end of the same block: include landscaping adjacent to the pathway in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C. 4. For lots accessed by common driveways, an exhibit shall be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks, fencing,building envelope and orientation of the lots and structures. Driveways for abutting properties that aren't taking access from the common driveway(s) shall be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line away from the common driveway. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited unless separated by a minimum 5-foot wide landscaped buffer. 5. Provide address signage for homes accessed by the common driveways on Lots 6 and 22, Block 1; Lot 7, Block 2; and Lot 15,Block 5 for emergency wayfinding purposes. 6. A perpetual ingress/egress easement is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder for all common driveways,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. A copy of the recorded easement should be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 7. Development shall be limited to 30 building lots until such time as a secondary access that meets International Fire Code(IFC)is built and approved by the Fire Dept. Page 27 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 193 of 366 8. All existing structures on the site shall be removed prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat phase in which they are located. 9. Parking is restricted to only the south side of the 27-foot wide street section(i.e. W. Windswept Dr.); signage shall be installed prohibiting parking on the north side of the street to ensure emergency access can be provided. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 A street light plan will need to be included in the final plat application. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the City's Design Standards. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272 1.2 Provide water easement in shared drive(Block 1,Lot 24 21)for potential connection of parcel to the east. A second water connection for redundancy shall be required to the water-main in Linder-Read thr-ough the walking path between lots 13 & 14 (Bleek 2) with the development of the second phase of the subdivision. 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2"x I I" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year- round source of water(MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject Page 28 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 194 of 366 to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals,or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B.Whitney at(208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing,landscaping, amenities, etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. Page 29 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 195 of 366 2.20 At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT http://weblink.meridianciiy.orglWebLink8lDocView.aspx?id=178616&dbid=0 D. POLICE DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancity.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=179502&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Lty E. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO(COMPASS) https://weblink.meridiancity.orglWebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=178893&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC hty F. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=179148&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC hty G. ADA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES https://weblink.meridiancity.org WWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=179666&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC H. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridianciU.ory WWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=178990&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ity Page 30 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 196 of 366 I. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink1DocView.aspx?id=178933&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC J. WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT(WASD) h ttps:11we b lin k.m eridia n c i ty.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=17910 6&db id=0&rep o=Meridia n C iu https:11weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=182029&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC hty https://weblink.meridianciU.oLvlWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=182153&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC K. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) https://weblink.meridianciU.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=179666&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC iv L. PARK'S DEPARTMENT https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=180054&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Lty IX. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone (UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the Commission,the Council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the Applicant is proposing to annex and develop the subject property with 92 single-family residential units in the R-15 zoning consistent with the MDR FLUM designation. (See section V above for more information) 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment and development complies with the purpose statement of the residential districts in that it will contribute toward the range of housing opportunities available within the City consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare as the proposed medium density residential uses should be compatible with adjacent existing and future residential and commercial uses in the area. Page 31 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 197 of 366 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The City Council finds City services are available to be provided to this development. The School District has submitted comments, included in Section VIII.J that currently show student enrollment is above capacity for the elementary, middle and high school—the School District is of the opinion it would be best to delay the approval of this development until they are within a year of opening Owyhee High School. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The City Council finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City if the Applicant complies with the conditions in Section VIII. B. Preliminary Plat(UDC 11-613-6) 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; (Ord. 08-1372, 7-8-2008, eff. 7-8-2008) The City Council finds the proposed plat is generally in conformance with the UDC if the Applicant complies with the conditions of approval in Section VIII. 2. Public services are available or can be made available ad are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds public services can be made available to the subject property and will be adequate to accommodate the proposed development. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; The City Council finds the proposed plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's CIP. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The City Council finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. (Ord. 05-1170, 8- 30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) The City Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that need to be preserved with this development. Page 32 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 198 of 366 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item -3.J. Presenter: Sonya Allen Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item - Development Agreement(H-2019-0120) Hensley Station with Northern Land Holdings, LLC fka Northern Land Development, LLC, Located at 462 N. Black Cat Rd. Agreement between the City of Meridian and Norther Land Holding LLC flea Northern Land Development LLC for Hensley Stations (H-2019-0120) ATTACHMENTS: Descriptio yp Development Agreement H-2019-0120 Agreements /Contracts 3/2/2020 Exhibit A-H-2019-0120 Exhibit 3/2/2020 Exhibit B-H-2019-0120 Exhibit 3/2/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 199 of 366 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-029370 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=50 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 03/12/2020 08:43 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO NO FEE ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2021-028393 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=52 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 02/22/2021 10:43 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE Re-record to include page 3 of the document DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 1. City of Meridian PARTIES: 2. Northern Land Holdings LLC fka Northern Land Development LLC, Owner/Developer THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this Agreement), is made and entered into this loth day of March , 2020, by and between City of Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho,hereafter called CITY whose address is 33 E.Broadway Avenue, Meridian,Idaho 83642 and Northern Land Holdings LLC fka Northern Land Development LLC, whose address is 2150 N.Canter Place,Eagle,ID 83616 hereinafter called OWNER/DEVELOPER. 1. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, Owner is the sole owner, in law and/or equity,of certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho,described in Exhibit"A",which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full,herein after referred to as the Property; and 1.2 WHEREAS,Idaho Code §67-6511 A provides that cities may,by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of zoning that the Owner and/or Developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject Property; and 1.3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Section 11-513-3 of the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re-zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS,Owner/Developerhas submitted an application for annexation of 7.17 acres of land with an R-15 zoning district of the property listed in Exhibit "A",attached hereto, under the Unified Development Code,which generally describes how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.5 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer made representations at the public hearings before Planning and Zoning Commission and the Meridian City Council,as to how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made;and PAGE I OF 8 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT HENSLEY STATION(H-20I9-0120) ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-029370 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=50 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 03/12/2020 08:43 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES: 1. City of Meridian 2. Northern Land Holdings LLC fka Northern Land Development LLC, Owner/Developer THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this Agreement), is made and entered into this loth day of March , 2020, by and between City of Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho,hereafter called CITY whose address is 33 E.Broadway Avenue, Meridian,Idaho 83642 and Northern Land Holdings LLC fka Northern Land Development LLC, whose address is 2150 N.Canter Place,Eagle,ID 83616 hereinafter called OWNER/DEVELOPER. 1. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, Owner is the sole owner, in law and/or equity,of certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho,described in Exhibit"A",which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full,herein after referred to as the Property; and 1.2 WHEREAS,Idaho Code §67-6511A provides that cities may,by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of zoning that the Owner and/or Developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject Property; and 1.3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Section 11-513-3 of the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re-zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS,Owner/Developer has submitted an application for annexation of 7.17 acres of land with an R-15 zoning district of the property listed in Exhibit "A",attached hereto, under the Unified Development Code,which generally describes how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.5 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer made representations at the public hearings before Planning and Zoning Commission and the Meridian City Council,as to how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made;and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—HENSLEY STATION(H-2019-0120) PAGE I OF 8 1.6 WHEREAS, the record of the proceedings for requested annexation and zoning held before Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, includes responses of government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction, and includes further testimony and comment; and 1.7 WHEREAS, on the 18t" day of February, 2020, the Meridian City Council approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order ("Findings"), which have been incorporated into this Agreement and attached as Exhibit`B"; and 1.8 WHEREAS, the Findings require the Owner/Developer to enter into a Development Agreement before the City Council takes final action on final plat; and 1.9 WHEREAS,Owner/Developer deem it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and request; and 1.10 WHEREAS,City requires the Owner/Developer to enter into a development agreement for the purpose of ensuring that the Property is developed and the subsequent use of the Property is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement,herein being established as a result of evidence received by the City in the proceedings for zoning designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure zoning designation are in accordance with the amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian on October 11, 2016,Resolution No. 16-1173, and the UDC, Title 11. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein,the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement the following words,terms,and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for,unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 CITY: means and refers to the City of Meridian,a party to this Agreement, I which is a municipal Corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Broadway Avenue,Meridian, Idaho 83642. 3.2 OWNER/DEVELOPER: means and refers to Northern Land Holdings g LLC fka Northern Land Development LLC, whose address is 2150 N. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-HENSLEY STATION(H-2019-0120) PAGE 2 OF 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 201 of 366 Canter Place,Eagle,ID 83616,hereinafter called OWNER/DEVELOPER,the party that owns and is developing said Property and shall include any subsequent owner(s)/developer(s) of the Property. 3.3 PROPERTY: means and refers to that certain parcel(s)of Property located in the County of Ada,City of Meridian as in Exhibit"A"describing aparcel to be annexed and bound by this Development Agreement and attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall vest the right to develop the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed under the UDC. 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1. Owner/Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the site plan, preliminary plat, phasing plan, landscape plan, and conceptual building elevations included in Section VII and the provisions contained in the Staff Report attached to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law attached hereto as exhibit `B". b. The existing structures on the site shall be removed prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. c. All structures (i.e. single-family attached and townhome dwellings)proposed in this development are subject to the design elements contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area plan (TMISAP) and the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. Design review approval of the proposed structures shall be obtained prior to submittal of building permit applications. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance is not required. Porches are required for the units that front on W. Aviator St. and should be a dominant element located along at least 30% of the front faVade of buildings. Building materials,particularly at the street level facing Aviator St. should be high quality, such as terra cotta, natural stone, clay-fired units,or other approved masonry materials for architectural details or accents—the strongest use of such should be reserved for street level windows and entries. 6. COMPLIANCE PERIOD This Agreement must be fully executed within six (6) months after the date of the Findings for the annexation and zoning or it is null and void. 7. DEFAULT/CONSENT TO DE-ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-HENSLEY STATION(H-2019-0120) PAGE,3 OF 8 7.1 Acts of Default. Either party's failure to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement shall constitute default under this Agreement. 7.2 Notice and Cure Period. In the event of Owner/Developer's default of this Agreement, Owner/Developer shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of written notice from City to initiate commencement of action to correct the breach and cure the default,which action must be prosecuted with diligence and completed within one hundred eighty(180)days;provided,however,that in the case of any such default that cannot with diligence be cured within such one hundred eighty (180) day period, then the time allowed to cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. 7.3 Remedies. In the event of default by Owner/Developer that is not cured after _ notice as described in Section 7.2,Owner/Developer shall be deemed to have consented to modification of this Agreement and de-annexation and reversal of the zoning designations described herein, solely against the offending portion of Property and upon City's compliance with all applicable laws, ordinances and rules, including any applicable provisions of Idaho Code §§ 67-6509 and 67-6511. Owner/Developer reserve all rights to contest whether a default has occurred. This Agreement shall be enforceable in the Fourth Judicial District Court in Ada County by either City or Owner and/or Developer, or by any successor or successors in title or by the assigns of the parties hereto. Enforcement may be sought by an appropriate action at law or in equity to secure the specific performance of the covenants, agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein. 7.4 Delay. In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either Owner/Developer or City is delayed for causes that are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include,without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes,the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. 7.5 Waiver. A waiver by City of any default by Owner/Developer of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the default and defaults waived and shall neither bar any other rights or remedies of City nor apply to any subsequent default of any such or other covenants and conditions. 8. INSPECTION: Owner/Developer shall, immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the Property as required by this Agreement or by City ordinance or policy,notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other ordinances of the City that apply to said Property. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-HENSLEY STATION(H-2019-0120) PAGE 4 OF 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 202 of 366 9. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: City shall record this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, and submit proof of such recording to Owner/Developer, prior to the third reading of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the re-zoning of the Property by the City Council. If for any reason after such recordation, the City Council fails to adopt the ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property contemplated hereby,the City shall execute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement. 10. ZONING: City shall,following recordation of the duly approved Agreement,enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the Property as specified herein. 11. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The City may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit,cash deposits,certified check or negotiable bonds,as allowed under the UDC, to insure the installation of required improvements, which the Owner/Developer agree to provide, if required by the City. 12. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed,completed,and accepted by the City, or sufficient surety of performance is provided by Owner/Developer to the City in accordance with Paragraph 11 above. 13. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That Owner and/or Developer agree to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian unless otherwise provided by this Agreement. 14. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY: with copy to: City Clerk City Attorney City of Meridian City of Meridian 33 E.Broadway Ave. 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 OWNER/DEVELOPER: Northern Land Holdings LLC fka Northern Land Development LLC 2150 N. Canter Place Eagle, ID 83616 14.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 15. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement,the prevailing party shall be entitled,in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—HENSLEY STATION(H-2019-0120) PAGE 5 OF 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 203 of 366 jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default,termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 16. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term,condition and provision hereof,and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 17. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including City's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the Owner and/or Developer,each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property,or portions thereof,except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. City agrees,upon written request of Owner and/or Developer,to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if City,in its sole and reasonable discretion,had determined that Owner and/or Developer have fully performed their obligations under this Agreement. 18. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 19. DUTY TO ACT REASONABLY: Unless otherwise expressly provided,each parry shall act reasonably in giving any consent,approval,or taking any other action under this Agreement. 20. COOPERATION OF THE PARTIES: In the event of any legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third party (including a governmental entity or official) challenging the validity of any provision in this Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate in defending such action or proceeding. 21. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements,condition and understandings between Owner and/or Developer and City relative to the subject matter hereof,and there are no promises,agreements,conditions or understanding,either oral or written, express or implied, between Owner and/or Developer and City, other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns,and pursuant,with respect to City,to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. 21.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing re-zoning of the subject Property herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-HENSLEY STATION(H-2019-0120) PAGE 6 OF 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 204 of 366 22 . EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT : This Agreement shall be effective on the date the Meridian City Council shall adopt the amendment to the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property and execution of the Mayor and City Clerk . [end of text ; signatures , acknowledgements , and Exhibits A and B follow] ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided . OWNER/DEVELOPER : Northern Land Holdings LLC fka Northern Land Development LLC By * T,4A4a MF, ?,X4X Its : CITY OF MERIDIAN ATTEST . By : Mayor Robert E . Simison Chris Johnson, City Clerk DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - HENSLEY STATION (H-201 M 120) PAGE 7 OF 8 STATE OF IDAHO ) . ss: County of Ada ) On this 44 day of ,�i (�,2020,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared ( p 11'7,a 8 Le_ known or identified to me to be the M, M/ /L of Northern Land Holdings LLC fka Northern Land Development LLC,and the person who signed above and acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of said Corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL) .•`•••ti���•M vEL �•w;:•OTA 'ti�,p's. Notary Public r l daJ41p _ R Y Residing at: (� , p � IC My Commission Expires: - o2 g- XQ ?Lf PT hh: s J'lc'.;'No.20� .Z.�••'� .ram OF 1 .•'- STATE OF IDAHO ) '���"ossil" •' ss County of Ada ) On this loth day of March , 2020, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson, known or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk,respectively,of the City of Meridian,who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: Meridian, Idaho Commission expires: 03-28-2022 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-HENSLEY STATION(H-2019-0120) PAGE 8 OF 8 EXHIBIT A Annexation Legal Description Legal Description for Annexation Proposed Hensley Station Subdivision A parcel located in the SW"/, of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an Aluminum Cap monument marking the southwest corner of said Section 10, from which a Brass Cap monument marking the northwest corner of said SW'/ of Section 10 bears N 0°38'57"E a distance of 2653.05 feet; Thence N 0"38'57" E along the westerly boundary of said SW'/,a distance of 1087.83 feet to an angle point on the existing Meridian Clty Limits boundary,the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence leaving said existing Meridian City Limits boundary and continuing along said westerly boundary N WW57"E a distance of 633.96 feet to a point on the centerline of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way: Thence along said centerline S 88°25'SQ" E a distance of 495.18 feet to an angle point on the existing Merldian City Limits boundary; Thence leaving said centerline and along said existing Meridian City Limits boundary S 0°36'41" W a distance of 626.77 feet to a point on the northerly right-of-way of W. Aviator St, as shown it Instrument 2018-100444, Ada County Records; Thence along said northerly right-of-way and the existing Meridian City Limits boundary N 89'15'44"W a distance of 495,53 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 7.17 acres more or less. Clinton W. Hansen, PLS LPL LANp Land Solutions, PC 5��0 5T s4,p October 2, 2019 11118 (P 0 � TCN W_ } �} Hensley Sta tic)a Annexation -.i,ri 5s�lttt t��rs �__- sarw survrsna one["rnwng Job No 19.57 Hensley Station H-2019-0120 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 207 of 366 CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXATION PROPOSED HENSLEY STATION SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE I WEST, B.M. 1/4 CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY, IDAHO W. PINE AVE. a 1 a 0 75 150 300 " $ UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY S8825WE 4s5.18' � p O TOTAL ANNEXATION AREA=7.17 ACRES z n O N n ,n H PROPOSED HENSLEY STATION SUBDIVISION g z 462 N. BLACK CAT RD. m � POINT OF BEGINNING EXISTING CITY UNITS BOUNDARY N89'1544'W 495.53' W. AVIATOR ST. L LAND a 11118 0, Coll!"4 l0raZ1I1 it h 910 iLancls-olutions W. FRAMKLIN RD. °� w.�r 16 is Land Surveying and Consulting 231 E 51M Sr.STEL A MERIDIAN.I0 83642 I20�J2WAHO f208129&25571M ww Amd�d.tx—b& A6 M0.is-s7 Hensley Station H-2019-0120 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 208 of 366 EXHIBIT B CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW E IDIAIT�'� AND DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Annexation of 7.17 Acres of Land with an R-15 Zoning District; and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 65 Buildable Lots and 5 Common Lots on b Acres of Land in the R-15 Toning District for Hensley Station,by Kent Brown, Kent Brown Planning. Case No(s). H-2019-0120 For the City, Council Hearing Date of: February 4,2020(Findings on February 20, 2020) A. Findings of Fact l. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of.February 4, 2020,incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 4,2020,incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 4, 2020, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 4,2020, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67, Idaho Code (LC. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title I 1 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian,which was adopted April 19.2011, Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR HENSLEY STATION-AZ,PP H-2019-0120 i . Meridian City Councii Meeting Agenda Bala-10,12020M Page299,ti 36670 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 4,2020,incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Annexation and Preliminary Plat is hereby approved with the requirement of a Development Agreement per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of February 4,2020,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 11- 6E-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-651IA. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved,said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s)and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR HENSLEY STATION--AZ,PP H-2019-0120 -2- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Mdyaha1l9,1$02020 Pagecp OV 36270 agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing,and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28)days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521,any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight(28)days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52,Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of February 4,2020 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR HENSLEY STATION--AZ,PP H-2019-0120 - ; - Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Mdyaha1l9,1$02020 Pagecp 1IU 36@70 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the I8th day of February 2020. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TREG BERNT VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA PERREAULT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert Simison Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant,Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Charlene Way Dated.. 2-18-2020 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR HENSLEY STATION--AZ,PP H-2019-0120 - t- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda WTahaflp,1$02020 Pagecp A40 36@70 EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORTC�,WEI'i DIAIT=-- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING February 4,2020 DATE: Legend tn TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Sonya Allen, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 - -- Bruce Freckleton, Development — - Services Manager 208-887-221 1 {.I SUBJECT: H-20I9-0I20 Hensley Station-ALT,AZ,PP, PS LOCATION: 462 N. Black Cat Rd., in the SW '/a of _ .X Section 10,T.3N., R.I W. - r' I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Annexation of 7,17 acres of land with an R-15 zoning district and Preliminary Plat consisting of 65 building lots and 6 common lots on 6 acres of land in the R-15 zoning district. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description details Page Acreage 6 acres Future Land Use Designation MHDR(medium high density residential)in Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan(TMISAP) Existing Land Use(s) Rural residential/agricultural Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family attached dwellings;and townhome dwellings Lots(#and type;bldg./common) 65 building lots;6 common lots Phasing Plan(#of phases) 1 or 2 phases(as shown on the plat in Section VIi.S] Number of Residential Units(type 6 attached units&59 townhome units of units) Density(gross&net) 10.83 gross; 14.47 net Open Space(acres,total 0.71 of an acre(or 12%) [%I/b uffer/qual i h ed) Amenities Fire pit with 2 benches Physical Features(waterways, The Purdam Gulch Drain crosses the northeast corner of hazards,flood plain,hillside) this site Neighborhood meeting date; = of 9/18/19;5 attendees attendees: History(previous approvals) None Page 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda E 4j9jaWV,120202-9 Ra?eg43W b6E170 B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yeslno) Yes • Requires ACHD Commission No Action(yes/no) Access(Arterial/Collectors/State Private street access proposed via Aviator St.,a collector Hwy[Local)(Existing and Proposed) street;emergency access only via N. Black Cat Rd.,a minor arterial street(100'+1-south of the north property line)(the existing access via Black Cat is required to be closed) Traffic Level of Service Better than"E"(acceptable level of service for a 2-lane minor arterial is"E") Stub Streetllnterconnectivity/Cross No stub streets or cross-access easement are proposed Access Existing Road Network Black Cat Rd. is currently improved with 2-travel lanes, approximately 25' of pavement and no curb,gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. Aviator St.was constructed as '/2 of a 3-lane collector 46' street section with 23'of pavement plus 12 additional feet of pavement totaling 357 with vertical curb,gutter&a 7' wide attached sidewalk on the south side of the roadway with a 3' gravel shoulder and borrow ditch on the north side of the roadway.As it continues east&transitions to a 2-lane roadway, it's constructed as %of a 36'collector roadway with IS' of pavement plus 12'additional pavement totaling 30' with vertical curb,gutter and 7' attached sidewalk on the south side of the roadway with a 3'gravel shoulder and borrow ditch on the north side. Existing Arterial Sidewalks Buffers Proposed Road Improvements Black Cat Rd.is listed in the ClP to be widened to 5-lanes from Franklin Rd.to Chcrry Ln.and the Black Cat/Cherry intersection to be widened to 5-lanes on the north leg,6- lanes on the south leg,4-lanes an the west leg and 5-lane~ on east leg and signalized between202I-2025 Fire Service ■ Distance to Fire Station 2.3 males(Fire Station#2) • Fire Response.Time 4:00 minutes(under ideal conditions) • Resource Reliability 81%(meets targeted goal a 801,14 or greater) Risk Identification 2(current resources would be adequate to supply service) ■ Accessibility Meets requirements • Special/resource needs None ■ Water Supply 1,500 gallonslminute for 2 hours(may be less if buildings are fully s rinklcred) Police Service No comments submitted Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Services 0 feet • Sewn Shed South Black Cat trunkshed - - Page 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Mitroh0q,1802020 Paee,�ql4bf a6@70 Description Details Page • Estimated Project Sewer See application ERU's • WRRF Declining Balance 13.8 • Project Consistent with WW Yes Master Plan/Facility Plan Water • Distance to Water Services D feet ■ Pressure Zone 1 • Estimated Project Water See application ERU's ■ Water Quality None • Project Consistent with Water Yes Master Plan ■ Impacts/Concerns The dead end water main in W.Freestyle Ln. should end with a fire hydrant,not a blow-off C. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend J H f�Pa,eci Loco'ar• � ���® ��Pres�t Loca�+an � I J—i Resiclerifia.)� Med-Hi h u fri I Re side�nfiaOp Mixed G.as P ployment Civic MU- Zoning Map Planned Development Map - Page 3 - Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda M#Fabi flV,120202.0 Pagecp3V WON Legend ® Legend 1� f�l Fre;eci Locoian Q 8 ��Prc ec t Lx a ter. 11110 E Q7�' ; M1- ( R ' M1 1. R-15 TN•C._- R-40 C-C ---`t III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Northern Land Development,LLC—2150 N. Canter Pl.,Eagle,ID 83616 B. Owner: Same as Applicant C. Representative: Kent Brown, Kent Brown Planning—3161 E. Springwood Dr.,Meridian, ID 83642 IV. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper notification published 12/13/2019 0111712020 Radius notification mailed to property owners within 300 feet 12/10/2019 01/14/2020 Public hearing notice sign posted 121211Z019 111$IZOZO on site Nextdoor posting 12/10/2019 01/14/2020 V. STAFF ANALYSIS A. Future Land Use Map Designation(htt s:lli wives: .nicr-idiarrci�.orgleonrpplarr} Medium High-Density Residential (MHDR): The purpose of the MHDR designation is to allow for the development of a mix of relatively dense residential housing types including townhouses, condominiums and apartments. Residential gross densities should range from 8 to 15 units per acre.These are relatively compact areas within the context of larger neighborhoods and are typically located around or near mixed use commercial or employment areas to provide Page 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda K4#rokeV,120202-0 Ra@egl853 W076 convenient access to services and jobs for residents. Developments need to incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place and should also incorporate connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways, attractive landscaping and individual project identity. The proposed development consisting of'a mix of attached dwellings and diftrent types of' townhouse dwellings at a gross density of 10.83 unitslacre is consistent with the uses and density desired in the AIHDR designation. B. Comprehensive Plan Policies his:Iln-mits.pne►•idirr►rcitv.orgleo►n Ian): Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this application and apply to the proposed use and development of this property(staff analysis in italics): • "Provide for a wide diversity of housing types(single-family. modular, mobile homes and multi-family arrangements)and choices between ownership and rental dwelling units for all income groups in a variety of locations suitable for residential development."(3,07.03B) The proposed mix of attached and townhome dwellings will contribute to the diversity in housing types in the western portion of the Cit7,. Stglf is unaware i_f'the proposed unit.►will be owner occupied or rental units. "Provide housing options close to employment and shopping centers."(3.07.02D) The proposed development it-ill provide housing options in close proximity to the existing and fixture employment and shopping centers along the Teti Mile corridor. • "Require open space areas within all development."(6.01.01A) A minimum of 10%qualified open space is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3. As proposed, the development axceeds the Mininitun standards at 12%. "Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is contiguous to the City."(3.0 1.01 F) Urban services can be provided and this development is contiguous to the City. ■ "Restrict private curb cuts and access points on collectors and arterial streets."(3.06,02❑); One private street access is proposed for the development via the collector street along the southern boundan,of'the site;access is not available via a local street. • "Require pedestrian access connectors in all new development to link subdivisions together to promote neighborhood connectivity as part of a community pathway system,"(3.03.43B) There are no pedestrian connections proposed to adjacent properties other than sidewalk- proposed along the collector street at the southern boundary,of the site. C. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There is an existing home and accessory structures on this site that will be removed with development. Removal of these structures should take place prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. D. Proposed Use& Site Design Analysis: Single-family attached and townhome dwellings are listed in UDC Table 11-2A-2 as principal permitted uses in the R-15 zoning district. The preliminary plat is proposed to develop in one or two phases as shown on the preliminary plat in Section VII.B; the Applicant is unsure at this time if it will be phased. Page 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda N/Wyotiatp,9802020 Rage(p7lbf WON The site design is subject to the design elements in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (TMISAP). In accord with the Plan,structures are proposed to be built near the edge of the street buffer and front on Aviator St.,the primary street,with parking at the rear of the structures and pedestrian walkways from each unit to the perimeter sidewalk with trees and landscaping in the front yards; structures are proposed to be 2-stories in height. E. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3): None F. Dimensional Standards(UDC 11-2): Al] development is subject to the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 1 1-2A-7 for the R- 15 district. The minimum lot size in the R-15 district is 2,000 square feet(s.L); there are 14 lots that are below the minimum lot size—revisions should be made to the plat to comply. G. Access(UDC 11-3A-3, 11-3H-4): One access is proposed via W. Aviator St., a collector street along the southern boundary of the site; an emergency only access is proposed 100'+1- feet south of the north property line via Black Cat Rd., an arterial street. Private streets are proposed for internal access within the site. Private streets are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4. All drive aisles are required to be posted as fire lanes with no parking allowed; if curbs exist next to the drive aisle(s), they shall be painted red. H. Parking(UDC I1-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided for the proposed single-family attached and townhouse units as set forth in UDC Table 1 1-3C-6. All of the units are proposed (o have 3 bedrooms.Therefore,4 spaces are required per dwelling unit with at least 2 of those in an enclosed garage, the other spaces may be enclosed or a minimum 10' x 2W parking pad. A]I of the units have a 2-car garage and a parking pad for 2 cars that complies with these standards. Additionally, a total of 10 guest parking spaces are proposed along the south end of the mew_ 1. Pathways(UDC 11-3A-8): A pedestrian pathway is proposed through the central mew within this development: landscaping is required adjacent to the pathway as set forth in UDC 11-3B-12C as proposed. J. Sidewalks{UDC 11-3A-1 : Sidewalk are required adjacent to all public streets as set forth in UDC 1 1-3A-17. detached sidewalks are required along arterial and collector streets. A detached sidewalk is proposed along N. Black Cat Rd.,an arterial street, and an attached sidewalk is proposed along W.Aviator St., a collector street. The sidewalk along Aviator St.should be detached as set forth in UDC 11- 3A-17C at least 6-feet from the back-of-curb as required by ACHD with landscaping consisting of grass or vegetative groundeover(no trees) in the parkway area. K.. Parkways(UDC 11-3A-17): Parkways are not proposed within this development. L. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): A 25-foot wide street buffer is required along N. Black Cat Rd.,an arterial street, and a 20-foot wide street buffer is required along W. Aviator St., a collector street,as set forth in UDC Table l 1-2A-7, landscaped per the standards Iisted in UDC 1 1-3B-7C as proposed.A 2-3' tall berm is proposed within the buffer along Black Cat per the detail on Sheet Lt.2 of the landscape plan. Page 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda N/tEtrobit011202020 Pa6e(p8 tb 366170 The UDC (11-3B-7C.2a)requires all residential subdivision street buffers to be on a common lot maintained by a homeowner's association. The Applicant requests approval of Alternative Compliance to this standard to allow the street buffer along Aviator St.to be placed in an easement on Building lots(Lots 2-12, Block 1) rather than a common lot.This will allow the townhomes to be placed closer to W. Aviator St. to enhance the streetscape consistent with new urbanism design and the design standards in the TMISAP; these units will be accessed from the rear with the front doors facing Aviator St. All of the common area open space in the subdivision will be maintained by the Homeowner's Association for consistent maintenance and appearance. Staff is supportive of the request for Alternative Compliance based on the Findings in Section IX.D. Landscaping is required along the pathway in the mew in accord with the standards listed in UDC l 1-3B-12C as proposed. Landscaping is required within common areas per the standards listed in UDC 1 I-3G-3E as proposed. Mitigation is required for all existing 4"caliper or greater trees that are removed from the site with equal replacement of the total calipers lost on site; mitigation trees are in addition to all other landscaping required as set forth in UDC l I-3B-10C.5. The landscape plan (Sheet L1.2)states 223 total caliper inches are required for mitigation; the plan also states existing trees to be saved on site will count toward mitigation—however,existing trees do not count toward mitigation.Therefore,additional trees(223 caliper inches) should be depicted on a revised landscape plan that comply with the minimum mitigation standards,or alternative compliance may be requested as set forth in UDC 11-5B-5. M. Qualified Open Space (UDC 11-3G): A minimum of 10%qualified open space is required to be provided within the development that complies with the standards listed in UDC 1 1-3G-3B. Based on 6 acres of land,a minimum of 0.60 of an acre126,136 square feet is required. A total of 0.83 of an acre136,285 square feet(or 14%)qualified open space is proposed as shown on the exhibit in Section VII.❑ consisting of half the street buffer along Black Cat Rd., an arterial street; all of the street buffer along W. Aviator St., a collector street; the 35' wide common mew; and the open space at the northeast coiner of the development. Because the street buffer along Aviator St. is proposed to be on an easement on privately owned lots rather than in a common lot owned by the HOA,the buffer(5,348 square feet10.12 of an acre) does not count toward the minimum open space standards. however,the project still complies with the minimum standards without this area at 30,937 square feet10.71 of an acre(or 12%). N. Qualified Site Amenities (UDC 11-3G): A minimum of one(1) site amenity is required based on the area of the site that complies with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3C. The Applicant proposes an open grassy area exceeding 50' x 100' in area;2 benches near a 15' x 15' gathering area with a fire pit, and a pedestrian pathway through the central mew as site amenities. In order for the open grassy area to qualify as a site amenity,it would need to be at least 20,000 square feet over the minimum amount of qualified open space required; it's under that amount at 10,019 square feet. In order for the pedestrian pathway to qualify as a site amenity it would need to connect to an existing or planned pedestrian or bicycle route outside the development as designated in the Pathways Master Plan; it does not. The fire pit with 2 benches in itself doesn't qualify as a site amenity; after discussions with the Applicant,a 15' x 15' Pa c 7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Wrobit011202020 Pa6e(P9%I a66170 shade structure with picnic tables will also be provided in accord with UDC standards(see detail of shade structure in Section VII.D). 0. Waterways(UDC 11-3A-6): The Purdam Gulch Drain and associated easement crosses the northeast corner of this site as depicted on the site plan and plat. The UDC (I1-3A-611.3) requires the waterway to he piped if it's not improved as a water amenity or linear open space as defined in UDC 11-A-1. The Applicant requests Council approval of a waiver to this provision as allowed by UDC 11- 3A-613.3a,to allow the short segment of waterway crossing this site to remain open and not be piped consistent with that upstream and downstream.The UDC allows Council to waive this requirement if it finds the public purpose requiring such will not be served and public safety can be preserved. Staff recommends a fence is installed along the easement of the drain to ensure public safety constructed per the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6C.3. P. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, II-3A- All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC l 1-3A-6 and 11-3A-7. Fencing is proposed as follows: 6' tall solid vinyl fencing is proposed along the back edge of the street buffer along Black Cat Rd., and a 4' solid vinyl fence with 2' lattice is proposed along the north and east boundaries of the site_ Fencing should be depicted as such on the landscape plan. Q. Utilities(UDC 11-3A-21): All utilities are required to be installed at or below grade in accord with the City's adopted standards,specifications and ordinances. Street ligliting is required to be installed in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Adequate fire protection is required in accord with the appropriate fire district standards. R. Pressurized Irrigation System (_UDC 11-3A-15) An underground pressurized irrigation system is required to be constructed and service provided to each lot in the proposed subdivision. S. Storm Drainage (UDC I1-3A-18} An adequate storm drainage system is required to be provided in this development in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances, design and construction is required to follow Best Management Practices as adopted by the City. T. Building Elevations [UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Ma►►uao: A variety of structure configurations are proposed consisting of(3)single-family attached structures(2 units in each structure for a total of 6 units); (9)4-plex structures in two different configurations(Type 1 --rear-loaded facing a mew, consisting of 8 units; and Type 2--front- loaded facing the street,consisting of 28 units);(1) rear-loaded 5-plex structure containing 5 units; and(3)rear-loaded 6-plex structures containing a total of 18 units(see site plan and building elevations in Sections VILE and F respectively). Building materials consist of a variety of horizontal and vertical siding and stucco with stone veneer accents; color schemes are the same on each of the buildings throughout. All structures(i.e. single-family attached and townhome dwellings) proposed in this development are subject to the design elements in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (TMISAP) and the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. Page 8 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda KtArobit011202020 Pa?ec�20 bt 436670 Design review approval of the proposed structures should be obtained prior to submittal of building permit applications.A Cerld faeale of'Zoning Compliance is nol required. The building design is subject to the design elements in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan(TMISAP). In accord with the Plan,porches should be provided for each unit facing W. Aviator St.and should be a dominant element along at least 30% of the front faVade of the buildings—revisions to the elevations should be made to comply. Building materials, particularly at the street level facing Aviator St.should be high quality, such as terra Gotta, natural stone,clay-Bred units,or other approved masonry materials for architectural details or accents—the strongest use of such should be reserved for street level windows and entries. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation with the requirement of a Development Agreement and the preliminary plat with the conditions included in Section Vill per the Findings in Section IY. The Director approved the requests for private streets and alternative compliance per the Findings in Section IX. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard this item an January 2,2020. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ and PP requests. I. Summary of Commission public hearing a. In favor: Kent Brown b. In apposition: David Petersen.Jason Hibbard C. Commenting: None d. Written testimony: Kent Brown,Apdalicant's Representative(in aareernent with staff re ort L. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a Against proposed townhomes and private streets due to concerns children will be playing in the streets,cars won't fit in drivewayslgarages; and, b. Concern pertaining to increased traffic congestion in this area. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. Concern pertaining to noise impacts to a residential development from trains on the adjacent railroad_tracks and the need for a buffer in this area; b. Desire for children's play equipment to be provided as an amenity for the development, C. The need for pedestrian improvements within the railroad right-of-way along Black Cat Rd., d. Concern that enough guest parking is provided. 4. Commission changes)to Staff recommendation: a. The Commission recommended the Applicant work with Staff to provide an amenity more conducive to children. 5_ Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: a. In response to the Commission's recommendation for a site amenity more conducive to children,the Applicant proposes a bocce ball court[see Section VII.D]. C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on February 4-2020. At the public hearing..the C4unCi1 moved tv.apprrz th�uOiWtA Rod lip_re-qLLWts= 1_ Sir ary of the City Council Du lb ichearA-"n� Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda fol�flQ;1B02o?{]�a�e�t@7C1 _ Yoi ent��Q .-E li att_' Re scutatim.hm NlWc,,N9dkruLand Drvelopa— ,AppI ctt b, In opposition:None d. Sri e_testimony-No new testimony since the Conunis ion__h_ea_rin� � Staff presentin an li i a Allen other_Staff ummenting_m=BuIkmLN-om Z key is-ue-s_1 nfpublic testimony: None I K- true nf-dis-c-uusion-b M C❑ur-w1: a. The-need for children's play equipment to be provided as an amenity rather than a bocce ball court:--------- - - -- - - - — ----- --------- ----- Ts_afftc gyugegioain_ W -area armed.e-_x_isling-ar�ARLa= improvements along Black Cat Rd. and the lack of a turn lane onto Aviator from Black ThrQn� �f tl��h�� _�IQnA�+itr�r f west of the entry] tirttre buffer mn4�_ed to be in an east rather than a cornr _i0t rcs�ing in a closer whack v tb-c sfte-L - 4, City Co�ncil.�ha_n���t��9r�_riii_5_s_i�n r_ec_Qxt]att� �n: Council rewired a children' lav sttvcture suitablef�_r_ _r it _rep be i _t 11e y5-an ni gr��erit�d uTtrl hdwwtin&1 with hC jWl -AinoWe.s thaf-p instead-of a bocce$ail court see condition V ]� Council approved a waiver to UDC 11-3A-5B.3 to allow the Purdam Gulch_ Drain to rr.m in own and-not be-pi�� Page 10 - Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda REIrolmto,9802020 PaYeW21"a6Q70 VII. EXHIBITS A. Annexation Legal Description & Exhibit Map Legal Description for Annexation Proposed Hensley Station Subdivision A parcel located in the SW'/, of Section 10, Township 3 North, flange 1 West, Boise Meridian Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as Follows: Commencing at an Aluminum Cap monument marking the southwest corner of said Section 10, from which a Brass Cap monument marking the northwest corner of said SW'/, of Section 10 bears N 0`38'57"E a distance of 2653.05 feet: Thence N 0'38'57" E along the westerly boundary of said SW'/,a distance of 1087.83 feat to an angle point on the existing Meridian City Limits boundary, the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence leaving said existing Meridian City Limits boundary and continuing along said westerly boundary N 0°38 57" E a distance of 633.96 feet to a point on the centerline of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way Thence along said centerline S 88°25'50" E a distance of 495.18 feet to an angle point on the existing Meridian City Limits boundary, Thence leaving said centerline and along said existing Meridian City Limits boundary S 01,36'41' W a distance of 626.77 feet to a point on the northerly right-of-way of W. Aviator St. as shown in Instrument 2018-100444. Ada County Records: Thence along said northerly right-of-way and the existing Meridian City Limits boundary N 89'1544"W a distance of 495.53 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 7.17 acres more or less. Clinton W. Hansen, PLS a�pI- LAIV'D Land Solutions, PC yy� STE G� October 2, 2019 a 11118 - ❑ ff�9PE 0 F TCNW_�A Hens tab ley Son Annexation r�f�E��[7�LtiCfal75 Jot No.19-57 L ..- Lams Grv�p ary6 CwMll:� Page I I Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda WynhnVj202020 Pa?eW3W WHO CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXATION PROPOSED HENSLEY STATION SUBDIVISION LOCATE❑ IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH. RANGE 1 WEST, B.M. 1/4 CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO W. PINE AVE. s �� ❑ 75 150 300 —_ —1 44IN MINION PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY SB8'25'54"E 495.18' m z TOTAL ANNEXATION AREA=7.17 ACRES z m � 1 F PROPOSED HENSLEY n STATION SUBDIVISION CO G a 462 N. BLACK CAT RD. z o � 2 Cn x w POINT OF BEGINNING I EXISTING CITY UMITS BOUNDARY up N89'15'44'W 495.53' W. AVIATOR ST. Ntit LA Np Q3 < ' fis a r 9 P Cr Te 0Ir 5� + 9 10 � L.;-)rjO ioIwfl-0fis W. FRANKLIN RD. �� Land Surveying and Consulting Is is 23 r t srH sr-sr�.n IAC D(Ak r0 R38a2 12081 n&2050 f208 Z$FJ Z55i r,u ww.vJnnd3dutivrs.prr n iy a: Page 12 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda(etayalmtp,1202020 Pa?eA4Faf WON B. Preliminary Plat(date: 10/07/2019)&Phasing Plan PHASING PLAN ■ "4 ' y ® ® HENSLEY STATION W _,_„r, � � S'UT37JIVISIUN 4 - I.t- �1 I E.r j, M H o 41 1� v i ■ E 'PHAS m l Twcrb � I i ill � *ON O�ASE I ■ v :3` , °ter[ to Alp _— --� _ Ibr_ • �417 _—- IE�m 91RVEYWt i�Ally� a a s o • a e-a a � Ta^ y� J^ • t �I w . ,e oa•� m •••• mo� -. 10 ~Pt.1 Page 13 - Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda WFoketp,1802O20 Ra@e(�29W W170 C. Landscape Plan(date: 10/07/2019) 111 - -�. I�, II - LAIJIA9CAPE REtliJIREMEHTS PROJECT ENJILONG,SITE DATA O . LOCATION MAP DEVELOPER ENGINEER - _ ;y..Ir .. .. 1•E" .. [.EL 'i'T« I-CF',,aI - PLANNER'CONTAC r 'A t3ENERAd.LANpSGAPE N[]TES ii"T � � ` W o • WALIFIED OPEN SPACE LME11S) F i I, I- :�-+'hST&1'u`.'C.'.::iiw.=..._...n 0. A�ASTEA•PLAN•'••e' n,r an � ���µ�..w.+^nr'•�nrw.�•"~' � nm OPCN SPACC F e L1.0 Page 14 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda M&abatpj202020 Ra$eAOW W170 � � _� I': �- _ �w � �...:�..:;'•:.•.;��;: � Purr so,r��r..�.�,.,..��,,... i� '�' _.i4•Mir•,Lu -�� � .i ... a `�w•j.'}rvr •� r�r� P4 AL L 0 •..._tom. t ,...�. L4.7 _ •_ LEc,EIi[7 TREE Mfwmmm NOTES — F�,�} I I , I I � � �� ri x...•r.iu..r:.r.wr•e' =1d I i X'1_1.. xRr~r•,�, ,..� TREE mol tt TK>m N01 ES 17 RE • - i TREE TQANSPLANT NOTES; - T t fit f T 1- T- �• - - -_- — -- TYNCALLANDSCAPEBERM ExlB'r43--�r:orrlatis ru-u------ ' it Page 15 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Wyou 09,120202-0 PageW7W 436Q70 CAN65GLPF I�E'C6T � _ 744 r, x' :: �...,M. .:. a f k ZZZ' FU Wage 16 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda KbYohn1p,120202-0 P-agsW81 N 36E170 D. Qualified Open Space Exhibit(date: 10/07/2019)&Site Amenities l LANIMCAPE REOUiREPAE PITS PROJECT i. .. .� ., 1dm31 6U ILDING 15Trr DATA LOCATM— MAP i Ie�1� �.e,�....�..� ❑EYELOPER EE � ' � .3 ✓LMNERICONTACT 7J S —y DLNCRAI.LANDSCAPE UOTE3 Pk T:.;M.4•-.'•1. :6+.I-E: 177, p� QUALIFIED OPEN SPACF LEGEND: M ��MRSTER PLAN Yvtir_��._-_�' © .......,.....�.....,.r......- •..,r a 19 LI�N BPACESPACE kg 7 L1.D Y lI 'IL � l Page 17 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Wvolaflp,1Z02020 RageW9Rd 36E?70 Hensley Station Proposed Tot Lot Facility(if bocce not approved) Ages 5.12 Page 18 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda(Fi yah-nflp,1202a2.0 P-aReWOU 36VO E. Site Plan(date: 1 0/0 1120 1 9) 7 . i_ s A PLEY TrPE] DOM L„ EIV z Lu r r LU C3> Lzi1 a 5PE%TWE1 RREX TCF£1 f' Y.; 4 mac. 'i _ I ffw��• i� ;S .• ->M- } . SITE PLAN MG�T2cnFA1 sT rKT A51.0 Page 19 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda WyolmV,1202020 Pagec'081 a8 436OFo F. Building Elevations(date. 10/04/2019) HENSLEY STATION DEVELOPMENT 5-PLEX FRONT ELEVATION �r HENSLEY STATION DEVELOPMENT 5-PLEX FRONT ELEVATION 1� Now r � HENSLEY STATION DEVELOPMENT 5-PLEX REAR ELEVATION Page 20 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Wvabialp,120202,0 Ra@e(W;1i@ 3W70 HENSLEY STATION DEVELOPMENT 5-PLEX REAR ELEVATION mll HENSLEY STATION DEVELOPMENT 6-PLEX FRONT ELEVATION HENSLEY STATION DEVELOPMENT 6-PLEX FRONT ELEVATION Page 21 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Wrolrelq j202020 Ragec?�83-W 36@70 HENSLEY STATION DEVELOPMENT 5-PLEX REAR ELEVATION I I Fronting Mew q=a o -- -- _ - ----- ---- --- + - - -- ----------- ate+ i!71i 3 SIDE ELEVATION 1 4 SIDE ELEVATION 2 a X J CL 1 W o� zW ato a r-- ---- -- _ Imo— - --- � Co Z C7J~ W_ REAR ELEVATION --- . a ❑❑ n, ❑❑ ❑❑, . FRONTE].EVATIOH -- — TYPE 1 Page 22 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda f8t TIaV 1p,1202020 Pagec?34bf W@70 iAJA W SA ON fAgfl eQVu Fipk]I$Q YIEW - - - LIJ - a 0 O rJj 2W r= 4 p Nx _ e _ ris r 0 TYPE 1 = - Ab.o Ao x O� �a oN - a '!}x Y 42 _ L.� n.� Al 1400ft w TYPE 1 *' AO., Page 23 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda fait Fabl fl9,1202020 RageW3U a6E?70 5-Plex Fronting Mew 7 El -!------— ---- ate+ > ---- - { --- - — - — - nE o —- f J---_-_-_-_-__ °l_� _ _ - _�o�� -----__-_-_� _ . w R WELEVATION 1 4 SIDE ELEVATON 2 a w O J w a 7 u7 w , o� Q� �(D - ---------- - #f+ LLI cn 7 in -_ _---_-_- ---------- -------- ------- —_ --_---_ -----_— w IF -1 2 REAR ELEVATION - - _- ----- _--- --- we--- ❑ LInn 11 11 ❑ !❑1rJ , _ ------ -- - ----- ------ - --------- ----- -fie.:+ F1 11 7- LE ML -- TITJoo � o _ o0 I FRONT ELEVATION - TYPE 1 AO.z - Page 24 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Wyab'00,120202-0 Pagec?3871436@70 Ellime' • gal 01 ISO e!_ FRPHi{9q 4IF.1' f Rr1R i�i�'�'Af'�1' ci x p u, o v� ~D _ Q� ' lit O f �tt rr44 u j ._ -- per �y - _ — TO `")L-- r<�� TYPE 1 = AO0 r�r , e F z w R6RR,8RYRW RERR 164YIFW � ax O w wa [r w a N S Z w ~Z' Vl e- �. :� Y V z 1,- r, - I Fy - Me W 1, — — - — TYPE 1 w= Aa_, Page 25 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda K/Wyolml,0,1202020 Rage WIN a6670 6-Plex Fronting Me o _ _--772, = ___-�_ = T1: — ----©�� -------- � w �SIOE ELEVATION t —� 7310E ELEVA710N 2 w J c� W Z W 0 ! wD -- - -- -- LLJ 2 REAR ELEVATION '— ----- _---_-- _ Sle 110 �= LLJU r'cranoxs ,FRONTELEvRnuw -- ----- -- -- ----- ----- ------ - - YPE 1 Ao.2 Page 26 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda fait yahalq,120202-0 Race(p8M 361370 fC�I]M�Q YIEY/ f RI)NP[+y'+kt': w p Z y LLI N� .1 r w x hu.). � �1 ,-- ice" - _ - - -•� ;J - Far1 - _ 1 •J u IN �• - --_� - W y� �J6 7 I .i NNI TYPE 1 no.o 1_ + r 2 h[ai..: BEAR 15p vlEw LLI a x TA w o� i y w - -- - �.� —• � '-.`..fir _ —� — -- -- w O 'AS �y IrrIv T A r L!L !11-F��II� TYPE 1 _ A0.1 Page 27 — Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda fait Fabl fl9,1202020 RageWgN WEPO I -�---- LLI r�SIL]E ELEVA71oN 131L1E ELEVATION 2 CL w LQL Q 7 V LL QLLJ V7 �--------- -- =— —_-._ —� �2 I� 7��1 f ---�r� �. I I lrtl Z_ ------ -�_ ----- �_--�-- -- = -------- , f— _ — } W ll j Elo 7 REn t ELEVATION 6YR.1a..f:�L Ili ❑ ❑I ❑ ! ❑ - � ELEVATIONS 4 FRUNf LLLVAIION TYPE 2 AO.z Page 28 - Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda fait yabiaflp,1202020 Rageo40-67 36@70 -- Page 2g --- ---- :A- FqWT 00 AM PROUT L40 VCW LLJ LU Dr 1A 0 uJ UJ ID ST Z k Uj T I z LA 7T -jI lkgN' l FLOORP,m �YILIIICCR�P-111 TYPE 2k --,dIMjjpr' m FEM�hy�V,Ew z zw z -------- AL-------------------------------- -------- F F1 P F1 ----- -- ------ 44 i ii rL PAMN TYPE 2 Page 30 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda WFablA9,1202020 Pagec'#43-Mb6670 VIII. CITYIAGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANKING L A Development Agreement(DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance,a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s)at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6) months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall,at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the site plan, preliminary plat, phasing plan, landscape plan and conceptual building elevations included in Section VE and the provisions contained herein. b. The existing structures on the site shall be removed prior to signature on the final plat by the City.Engineer. c. All structures(i.e. single-family attached and townhome dwellings)proposed in this development are subject to the design elements contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan(TMISAP)and the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. Design review approval of the proposed structures shall be obtained prior to submittal of building pen-nit applications.A Cert{ficate gfZonin Compliance is not required. Porches are required for the units that front on W. Aviator St and should be a dominant element located along at least 30%of the front faVade of buildings. Building materials, particularly at the street level facing Aviator St should be high qualio!,such as terra cotta, natural stone, clay fired units, or other approved masonry materials for architectural details or accents—the strongest use vf'such should be reserved for street level windows and entries. ?. The preliminary plat,dated: 141712019, shall be revised as follows: a. The sidewalk along W.Aviator St.,a collector street, is required to be detached from the curb at least 6 feet,treasured from back of curb,in accord with UDC l 13A-17C and ACHD standards. b. A]1 building lots shall be a minimum of 2,000 square feet in accord with UDC Table I 1- 2A-7. c. Depict zero lot lines on the plat where buildings will span the lot line(s). 3. The landscape plan,dated: 1 017120 1 9,shall be revised as follows: a. Depict a fence along the Purdam Gulch Drain easement to preserve public safety in accord with UDC 11-3A-6B.3a per the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6C.3 if Council approves a waiver to UDC 1 1-3A-6B.3 allowing the drain to remain open. Council approved a waiver to UDC 11-3A-6B.3 to allow the drain to remain open and not be e_pip --- --- - --- - --open —____-_--- b. Depict a total of 223 additional caliber inches of trees on the site as mitigation for the same amount of caliper inches being removed from the site in accord with the standards listed in UDC 1 1-313-10C.5; or alternative compliance may be requested as set forth in Page 31 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Wrobit011202020 Payeo43 W WR70 UDC 11-5B-5. Existing trees proposed to be retained on the site do not count toward this requiretnent. c. The sidewalk along W.Aviator St. is required to be detached from the curb at least 5 feet, measured from back of curb, landscaping consisting of grass or vegetative groundcover per the standards in UDC 11-3B-5N (no trees per ACHD)shall be installed within the parkway between the hack of curb and sidewalk along W. Aviator St. d. Depict fencing as follows. b' tall solid vinyl fencing along the back edge of the street buffer along Black Cat Rd., and 4' solid vinyl fence with 2' lattice along the north and east boundaries of the site, 4. The Por-dam Gul eh Dr-ain shall be piped wker-e it er-asse5 this site i n aeeer-d with UPC 11 3 A t�cal rr�d_q%ahwr to_UD_CLl3A-_6_B_3 to allow the Pur--am Gitch drain to remain.oy z f not he reed. 5. A picnic area with tables and a 15' x 15' shade structure and a children's play structure mtitahl.�fQr_�6lislr_eii_shall be provided as amenities in addition to the proposed fire pit and two benches, in accord with the standards Iisted in UDC l 1-3G-3C. b. Private streets are required to comply with the design and construction standards listed in UDC 1 1-3F-4. All drive aisles shall be posted as fire lanes with no parking allowed; if curbs exist next to the drive aisle(s),they shall be painted red. 13. PUBLIC Wogs 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval L I The dead-end water main in W Freestyle Ln should end with afire hydrant,not a blow off. 1.2 Each lot/unit shall be required to have independent water and sewer services. 1.3 Revise the landscape plan for Lot 24 to remove the trees within the 20-foot wide sanitary sewer easement. The plan shall also need to show a minimum of a 14-Foot wide compacted grave access road over the sewer mainline per Meridian Public Works Standards. The drainage basin design may also need to be modified to not encroach within the area needed for the sewer mainline. 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet,if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 9-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility,or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat. but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit Page 32 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Rgrah-40,12020 N)Page;244bf WQ70 an executed easement(on the form available fro>n Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 9112"x I I"map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B}for review. Both exhibits must be sealed,signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document, All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year- round source of water(MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available,a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches,canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In perfon-ning such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at(208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-521 I. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place,sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping,amenities,etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. 2.1 1 All improvements related to public life,safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures.Where approved by the City Engineer,an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3 B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees,as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. Page 33 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda N/tEtrobit011202020 Pa?®c�49 V a6@70 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD.The design engineer shall provide certification that the.facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20 At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.rnerldiancity.org/publlc—works.aspx?ld=272- 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond.Applicant nnust file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years.This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for snore information at 887-221 1_ C. FIRE DEPARTMENT NO. lweblink.nmeridiancity.otgIWebLink8/Doc View.aspx?id=180596 D. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT(CDHD) hitp:Ilweblitik.meridianci n^.otglWebLink8lDoc View aspx?id=180513 E. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) help:lltveblfrrk._tlteridianciit ;orglweblink8lllkloc1l807?9IPagel.aspx F. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION of SOUTHWEST IDAHO(COMPASS) http:llivebl itrk.nteridiaitri ty.otglu�ehlitik8101docl!8078?IPugel.aspx Page 34 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda WrohOgj20202-0 Pa?eoWW a6670 G. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) hftp:llivebli►rk.tneridiancitE.or-olwebliiik8101docII81137lPa eg l.aypx IX. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-513-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the Commission,the Council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,.review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Couneil,finds the proposed development and nrap amendment to R-15 is consistent with the land uses and density anticipated in AIHDR designated areas such as this and is generally consistent with the provisions in the Comprehensive Plan. 2, The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement', The City Council finds the proposed map aniendtnent and development complies with the regulations of'the R-15 district and allows.fpr a varieo o1'residential land use types (i.e. single-ja►nily attached and townhomes). 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed map a►tendnrent shouldn't he materially detrimental to the.public. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to,school districts. and The Cite Council.f inds the proposed snap amendment shouldn't adversely impact the delivery of services in the City. 5. The annexation(as applicable) is in the best interest of city. The Citv Council,finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest ofthe City. B. Preliminary Plat(UDC 11-613-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat,the decision making body shall make the following findings: Page 35 -- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Wroh0q,1802020 Pa6egLV94 a6@70 I_ The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; (Ord. 08-1372, 7-8-2008,eff. 7-8-2008) The City,Council,finds the proposed plat is in general con7fornrance with the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the Unified Development Cade if tine Applicant complies with the conditions of'approval listed in Section V111. 2. Public services are available or can be made available ad are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Cift,Council finds public services are a14tilable and it-ill be extended with development to accommodate the proposed developnnent. 3- The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; The City Counrcil_finds the proposed plat is in eon2 formance with the,schedtnled public improvements in the CIP. 4, There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Cite Council finds there is public financial capability of'supporting services for the proposed development although the Developer will he finding aiding the improvements necessary, for the proposed development. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The City CouncilfindLs the proposed development.should not he detrimental to the public health.safe4,or general ri,elfare. 6- The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The City Council is unaware o f anv significant natural,.scenic or historic,features on this site that treed to be preserved. C. Private Street(UDC 11-3F-5): In order to approve the application,the director shall find the following: I. The design of the private street meets the requirements of this article; Stafffinds theproposed design of the private streets meets theslandarrls listed in UDC II- 3F 4. 2_ Granting approval of the private street would not cause damage, hazard,or nuisance, or other detriment to persons,property,or uses in the vicinity; and Staff finds granting approval of'the proposed private streets will not be detrimental to anlv persons or property in the general vicinity. 3_ The use and location of the private street shall not conflict with the comprehensive plan and/or the regional transportation plan. Staf ffinds the proposed use and location of the private streets shall not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan or regional transportation plait for this area. Page 36 - Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda N/WyolmV,9802020 Ra@eg48W a6670 4. The proposed residential development(if applicable)is a anew or gated development. Stuff f inds a portion of the proposed residential development is a rnew development. D. Alternative Compliance (UDC 11-5B-5E); Required Findings: In order to grant approval for an alternative compliance application, the Director shall determine the following: l. Strict adherence or application of the requirements are not feasible; or Staff finds strict adherence to the requirements are•feasihle but wmidd affect the design ofthe project. ?. The alternative compliance provides an equal or superior means for meeting the requirements; and Stafffands the proposed alternative compliance provides an equal means for-the meeting the requirement in UDC 11-3B-7C.2a..and will provide a•streetscape consistent with new arrhanisrn design as desired in UDC 11-5B-5B.2e and the design standards in the TMISAP. 3. The alternative means will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or impair the intended uses and character of surrounding properties. Stgf f finds the alternative means oftornpliance with UDC 11-3.8-7C.2a will not he ntaterial1v detrimental to the public we fare or harm the intended urea and character oj'the surrounding area. Page 37 - Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda N/tEtrobitO11202O20 Pa6e".90 WR70 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 3.K. Presenter: Mike Barton, MPR Parks Superintendent Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item -Temporary License Agreement between the Ada County Highway District and the City of Meridian Regarding the Pine Avenue Trailhead Amenity ga� A ATTACHMENTS: Descriptio Type loa ACHD Temp License Agreement- Pine Ave Trailhead Agreements /Contracts 3/9/2020 Amenit Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 250 of 366 Property Management No. - - Street: T R , S TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this loth day of March , 2020 ("Effective Date"), by and between the ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT, a body politic and corporate of the state of Idaho ("ACHD"), and the CITY OF MERIDIAN, a municipal corporation of the state of Idaho ("Licensee"). WITNESSETH : For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged by the parties: SECTION 1 . RECITALS. 1.1 ACHD owns and has exclusive jurisdiction over the public right-of-way located within the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as Pine Avenue (the "Right-of-Way"). 1.2 Licensee desires a license to use the Right-of-Way for the limited purposes hereinafter set forth, and, for the consideration and on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, ACHD is willing to extend such license to Licensee. SECTION 2. LICENSE; LICENSE NOT EXCLUSIVE. 2.1 On the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, ACHD hereby extends to Licensee a license on, over, across and under the Right-of-Way for the following uses and purposes ("Authorized Use") and no others: Installation, maintenance, repair and replacement of a trailhead amenity, including but not limited to concrete pavement, seating, pathway signs, water fountain, bike repair station and landscaping, as generally depicted on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Final designs, plans and specifications shall be approved as set forth in Section 3. 2.2 This Agreement does not extend to Licensee the right to use the Right-of- Way to the exclusion of ACHD for any use within its jurisdiction, authority and discretion or of others to the extent authorized by law to use public right-of-way. If the Right-of- Way has been opened as a public Highway (as used in the Agreement, the term "Highway" is as defined in Idaho Code § 40-109(5)), Licensee's Authorized Use is subject to the rights of the public to use the Right-of-Way for Highway TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT- Page 1 purposes. Licensee's Authorized Use is also subject to the rights of holders of easements of record or obvious on inspection of the Right-of-Way and statutory rights of utilities to use the public right-of-way. This Agreement is not intended to, and shall not, preclude or impede the ability of ACHD to enter into other similar agreements in the future allowing third parties to also use its public rights-of-way, or the ability of ACHD to redesign, reconstruct, relocate, maintain and improve its public rights-of-way and Highways as authorized by law and as it determines, in its sole discretion, is appropriate. SECTION 3. CONSTRUCTION OR INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENTS. Any repairs or maintenance of the Licensee's improvements currently located in the Right- of-Way or the installation or construction of improvements by Licensee in the Right-of- Way as permitted by the Authorized Use (the "Improvements") shall be accomplished in accordance with designs, plans and specifications approved in advance and in writing by ACHD as required to satisfy applicable laws, its policies and good engineering practices. In approving such plans and specifications, ACHD assumes no responsibility for any deficiencies or inadequacies in the design or construction of the Improvements, and the responsibility therefor shall be and remain in Licensee. SECTION 4. WAIVER AND ESTOPPEL STATEMENT BY LICENSEE. Licensee acknowledges and agrees that the license granted herein is temporary, non-transferable and merely a permissive use of the Right-of-Way pursuant to this Agreement. Licensee further acknowledges and agrees that it specifically assumes the risk that the license pursuant to this Agreement may be terminated before Licensee has realized the economic benefit of the cost of installing, constructing, repairing or maintaining the Improvements, and Licensee hereby waives and estops itself from asserting any claim that the license is in any way irrevocable because Licensee has expended funds on the Improvements and the Agreement has not been in effect for a period sufficient for Licensee to realize the economic benefit from such expenditures. SECTION 5. TERM. 5.1 The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date, and shall continue until terminated by either party, with or without cause, which termination shall be effective following thirty (30) days' advance written notice of termination given to the other party. 5.2 If Licensee defaults in the performance of any obligations incumbent upon it to perform hereunder, ACHD may terminate this Agreement and the rights extended to Licensee hereunder at any time, effective at the end of thirty (30) days following the date ACHD shall provide written notice of termination to Licensee, which notice shall specify such default(s). Licensee shall have such thirty (30) day period to correct and cure the specified defaults, and if so corrected and cured, to the satisfaction of ACHD, this Agreement shall not be terminated but shall continue in full force and effect. SECTION 6. FEE. There is no fee for Licensee's Authorized Use of the Right-of-Way under this Agreement. TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT- Page 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 252 of 366 SECTION 7. MAINTENANCE; FAILURE TO MAINTAIN; RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. 7.1 At its sole cost and expense, Licensee shall maintain the Improvements in good condition and repair and as required to satisfy applicable laws, the policies of ACHD and sound engineering practices. Licensee shall have access over, across and under the Right-of-Way for the purposes of accomplishing such repair and maintenance. 7.2 If the Highway on and/or adjacent to the Right-of-Way is damaged as a result of: (i) the performance by Licensee of the maintenance required by section 7.1, or the failure or neglect to perform such maintenance; and/or (ii) Licensee's design, installation or use of the Improvements, regardless of cause; at its sole cost and expense Licensee shall forthwith correct such deficiency and restore the Highway and the surface of the Right-of-Way to the same condition it was in prior thereto, and if Licensee shall fail or neglect to commence such correction and restoration within twenty-four (24) hours of notification thereof, ACHD may proceed to do so, in which event Licensee agrees to reimburse ACHD for the costs and expenses thereof, including, without limitation, reasonable compensation for the use of staff and equipment of ACHD. 7.3 Notwithstanding the provisions of section 7.2, should an emergency exist related to the Licensee's use of this license which threatens the stability or function of the Highway on or adjacent to the Right-of-Way or the safety of the public use thereof, ACHD shall have the right to immediately perform, on behalf of and at the cost of Licensee, necessary emergency repairs. 7.4 Licensee shall be responsible for the relocation of any existing utilities located on the Right-of-Way as may be required in connection with any construction or installation of Improvements by Licensee in the Right-of-Way. SECTION 8. RELOCATION OF IMPROVEMENTS. If during the term of this Agreement ACHD requires, in its sole discretion, at any time, and from time to time, that the Highway on and/or adjacent to the Right-of-Way be widened and/or realigned, redesigned, improved and/or reconstructed, Licensee hereby accepts responsibility for all costs for relocating, modifying or otherwise adapting the Improvements to such realignment and/or relocation and/or reconstruction if required by ACHD, which shall be accomplished by Licensee according to designs, plans and specifications approved in advance by ACHD in writing; provided, Licensee may elect to terminate this Agreement in lieu of complying with this responsibility, and further provided ACHD gives Licensee adequate written notice as necessary to allow Licensee to redesign, relocate, modify or adapt the Improvements to the realignment and/or relocation and/or reconstruction of TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT- Page 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 253 of 366 the Highway and also licenses Licensee such additional area of its right-of-way, if any, as may be necessary for the proper operation of the Improvements. SECTION 9. PERMIT. If the proposed construction and installation of the Improvements, or any reconstruction, relocation or maintenance thereof, requires Licensee to obtain a permit under ACHD policies, Licensee shall first obtain such permit from ACHD (Construction Services Division) before commencing such work, pay the required fees and otherwise comply with the conditions set forth therein. SECTION 10. NO TITLE IN LICENSEE. Licensee shall have no right, title or interest in or to the Right-of-Way other than the right to temporarily use the same pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. SECTION 11. NO COSTS TO ACHD. Any and all costs and expenses associated with Licensee's Authorized Use of the Right-of-Way, or any construction or installation of Improvements thereon, or the repair and maintenance thereof, or the relocation of Improvements or utilities thereon, or the restoration thereof at the termination of this Agreement, shall be at the sole cost and expense of Licensee. SECTION 12. TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS. Licensee agrees to pay all special assessments and personal property taxes that may be levied and assessed on the Improvements during the term of this Agreement. SECTION 13. RESTORATION ON TERMINATION. Upon termination of this Agreement, Licensee shall promptly remove all Improvements and restore the Right-of- Way to at least its present condition, less ordinary wear and tear. Should Licensee fail or neglect to promptly remove the Improvements and restore the Right-of-Way, ACHD may do so and assess Licensee for the costs thereof. Provided, ACHD and Licensee may agree in writing that some or all of such Improvements are to remain on the Right- of-Way following termination, and by entering into such an agreement Licensee thereby disclaims all right, title and interest in and to the same, and hereby grants such Improvements to ACHD, at no cost. Further provided, if the Authorized Use of the Right-of-Way under this Agreement is for landscaping in ACHD right-of-way and the irrigation and maintenance thereof, and the general purpose government with jurisdiction has adopted ordinances, rules and regulations governing the landscaping and maintenance of such right-of-way by owners of the adjacent property, to the extent such owners are obligated to maintain and irrigate the landscaping Licensee need not remove the same from the Right-of-Way. SECTION 14. INDEMNIFICATION. Licensee hereby indemnifies and holds ACHD harmless from and against any and all claims or actions for loss, injury, death, damages, mechanics and other liens arising out of the failure or neglect of Licensee, Licensee's employees, contractors and agents to properly and reasonably make Authorized Use of the Right-of-Way or properly construct, install, plant, repair or maintain the Improvements thereon, or that otherwise result from the use and occupation of the Right-of-Way by Licensee, including, without limitation, any attorneys' fees and costs that may be incurred by ACHD in defense of such claims or actions TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT- Page 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 254 of 366 indemnified against by Licensee hereunder. For claims or actions arising out of failures or neglects occurring during the term of this Agreement, Licensee's obligations pursuant to this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. SECTION 15. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW; WASTE AND NUISANCES PROHIBITED. In connection with Licensee's use of the Right-of-Way, throughout the term of this Agreement Licensee covenants and agrees to: (i) comply with and observe in all respects any and all federal, state and local statutes, ordinances, policies, rules and regulations, including, without limitation, those relating to traffic and pedestrian safety, the Clean Water Act and/or to the presence, use, generation, release, discharge, storage or disposal in, on or under the Right-of-Way of any Hazardous Materials (defined as any substance or material defined or designated as hazardous or toxic waste, material or substance, or other similar term, by any federal, state or local environmental statute, regulation or ordinance presently in effect or that may be promulgated in the future); (ii) obtain any and all permits and approvals required by ACHD or any other unit of government; and (iii) commit no waste nor allow any nuisance on the Right-of-Way. To the extent permitted by law, Licensee covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold ACHD harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, damages, liens, liabilities and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees), arising directly or indirectly from or in any way connected with the breach of the foregoing covenant. These covenants shall survive the termination of this Agreement. SECTION 16. ASSIGNMENT. Licensee cannot sell, assign or otherwise transfer this Agreement, the license herein extended or any of its rights hereunder except with the prior written consent of ACHD, which consent shall not be granted unless the assignee assumes all obligations, warranties, covenants and agreements of Licensee herein contained. SECTION 17. ATTORNEYS' FEES. In any suit, action or appeal therefrom to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs incurred therein, including reasonable attorneys' fees. SECTION 18. NOTICE. Any notice under this Agreement shall be in writing and be delivered in person, or by United States Mails, postage prepaid, or by public or private 24-hour overnight courier service (so long as such service provides written confirmation of delivery), or by facsimile verified by electronic confirmation. All notices shall be addressed to the party at the address set forth below or at such other addresses as the parties may from time to time direct in writing by notice given the other. Any notice shall be deemed to have been given on (a) actual delivery or refusal, (b) three (3) days following the day of deposit in the United States Mails, (c) the day of delivery to the overnight courier or (d) the day facsimile delivery is electronically confirmed. TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT- Page 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 255 of 366 If to ACHD: Ada County Highway District 3775 Adams Street Garden City, Idaho 83714 Attn: Right of Way Division If to Licensee: City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Department 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 206 Meridian, Idaho 83642 SECTION 19. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. This Agreement, the license herein extended and the covenants and agreements herein contained shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their successors and, if consented to by ACHD under section 16, Licensee's assigns. SECTION 20. EXHIBITS; RECITALS. All exhibits attached hereto and the recitals contained herein are incorporated herein as if set forth in full herein. SECTION 21. NO RECORDATION. This Agreement shall not be recorded in the Official Real Property Records of Ada County, Idaho. SECTION 22. WARRANTY OF AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE. 22.1 The person executing this Agreement on behalf of ACHD represents and warrants due authorization to do so on behalf of ACHD, and that upon execution of this Agreement on behalf of ACHD, the same is binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of, ACHD. 22.2 The person executing the Agreement on behalf of Licensee represents and warrants due authorization to do so on behalf of Licensee, and that upon execution of this Agreement on behalf of Licensee, the same is binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of, Licensee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Agreement to be executed the day, month and year first set forth above. TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT- Page 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 256 of 366 CITY OF MERIDIAN By: Robert Simison Its: Mayor ATTEST: By: Chris Johnson Its: City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO ) ss. County of Ada ) On this IOth day of March 2020, before me, Charlene Way , a Notary Public in and for the State of Idaho, personally appeared Robert Simison, known or identified to me to be the Mayor of the City of Meridian, and Chris Johnson, known or identified to me to be the City Clerk of the City of Meridian, the persons who executed this instrument on behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day, month, and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: Meridian, Idaho My Commission Expires: 3-28-2022 TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT- Page 7 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT By: Its: President ATTEST: By: Bruce Wong Its: Director STATE OF IDAHO ) ss. County of Ada ) On this day of 2020, before me, , a Notary Public in and for the State of Idaho, personally appeared , known or identified to me to be the President of the Ada County Highway District Commission, and Bruce Wong, known or identified to me to be the Director of the Ada County Highway District, the persons who executed this instrument on behalf of said District, and acknowledged to me that the Ada County Highway District executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: My Commission Expires: The Ada County Highway District (ACHD) is committed to compliance with Title Vl of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related regulations and directives. ACHD assures that no person shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, gender, disability or age, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any ACHD service, program or activity. TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT- Page 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 258 of 366 Issue Description Date ACHD 10-22-19 SITE. 'PINE AVE. ■ o `t�V, Opf8r,Nr, � ♦t� o �W.T9 ice' c r If w z 3 Z O' LAgg-$2_ ZNII/1t tt .ii ■u.li®i i.::Wot ■■07 E FRANKLINRD 7� 1ei9•la'!A�' PINE AVE. JENSENSELTS ASSOCIATES stte Planning MERIDIAN WATER METER Landscape Archlraetare EXISTING DRIVEWAY VICINITY MAP Urban Oeslpn APPROACH EXISTING STORM EXISTING DRIVEWAY CLEAR SITE TRIANGLE- EXISTING SIGNAL&BOX INLET 8 BOX APPROACH TYPICAL NOT TO SCALE / V MAX 12" O O JI .......... ........ ........... I I I 3/4"CHAMFER ALL SHADE TREE STREET \\\ O O v V _... _—_---EDGES KEEPER HONEYLOCUST. \ ,�..` LIGHT SAND BLAST SEE NOTE 2 \ t.`Q., RETAIN&PROTECT 1; io SIDEWALK FINISH. \ Q Q EXIST CONC GRADE Z FINISH GRADE LAWN SOD.; 10 y `� W '� " a _ - #5 BAR 12"VRET E.F. L ...:. .:.. .... _ HOOKS IN OPP f \- ....: :...t... VERTICAL I OW/R14,. Q \ 'QOMMl1N1T"/.GARDEN AREA'' "" W �" W '�" CONTROLJOINT- w #5 BAR 12"HORIZ E.F. pp $CONCRETE MOW$T.RIp 3/4"CHAMFER 60 LOW PLANTING BED Q V y " — (3)#5 BAR CONT MAIDEN GRASS OR SIMILAR + _ _ CONCRETE PER U 5l c .� - • m — ISPWC SEC 703 '^ CONCRETEBEATWALL vJ 4"OF 3/4"MINUS N W6TING GftAVEL�. CRUSHED BASE PER LL Uj PARK SIGN BY OWNER �" �' ACCESS ORfVE 28" ISPWC SEC 602 W COMPACTED W W w W W SUBGRADE \\ W ELEVATION SECTION < LLJ \ W VJ CONCRETE PAVEMENT- J SEE NOTE CONCRETE SEATWALL NN �f m •�' TRASH RECEPTACLE, L.1_ L W W W W W BIKE REPAIR,&DRINKING NOT TO SCALE O FOUNTAIN LLJ`` _ W // y y W RUSSIAN SAGE OR SIMILAR LL \ Q 0- '-EXISTING GRAVEL m e W [3 DRYLAND GRASS&SHRUB - Z w 0 Q DRIVEWAY . W W SEEDING U �' EXISTING METAL FENCE z WW WW owQa U) W W NOTES z W o 0 W W W W 1. CONCRETE SIDWALK TO BE 5"THICKNESS OF 4000 PSI CONCRETE OVER 6"OF 3/4"MINUS CRUSHED w _ Z Z BASE MATERIAL.BASE TO MEET ISPWC SECTION 800 AND BE COMPACTED TO 95%MAX DRY C /"� ^c �Jl DENSITY PER ASTM D1557. G LL. L1 G / 2. SHADE TREES TO BE 2-1/2"CALIPER STREET KEEPER HONEYLOCUST(GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS m y `ACHD STORM DRAVES'.THESE ARE CLASS II TREES WATER BASIN 7 3. TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE,SITE GRADING WILL DRAIN SITE IMPROVEMENT AREA TO EXISTING DRAIN INLET. 4. CITY OF MERIDIAN WILL MAINTAIN ALL IMPROVEMENTS. Job Number 1968 5. IRRIGATION WILL BE SUPPLIED FROM CITY OF MERIDIAN POTABLE WATER,SUPPLY LINE SHALL BE STUBBED FOR FUTURE USE IN ACHD BASIN AREA. 6. TREES SHALL NOT BE PLANTED WITHIN 10'CLEAR ZONE OF ALL ACHD DRAIN PIPE,STRUCTURES, OR FACILITIES. Drawn Checked J6A BWT Scale AS SHOWN Sheet Title LANDSCAPE PLAN NORTH Sheet Number 0' 10' 20, 30' SCALE:I"=10'@ 22X34 L 1 .0 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 259 of 366 Of Sheets C-/WE IDIAN-- ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item - 31. Presenter: Kim Warren, MPR Pathways Project Manager Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item - License Agreement Between the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District and the City of Meridian Regarding Caven Ridge Estates West No. 2 Subdivision to Support/Accompany ESMT 2020-0020 and 2019-0117 ATTACHMENTS: Descriptio T U loa NMI D License Agreement- Caven Ridge West No 2 Agreements /Contracts 3/5/2020 Subdivision Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 260 of 366 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-047674 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=10 NIKOLA OLSON 04124/2020 10:38 AM NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIG DIST NO FEE IIIIIIIIIIIIII I IIIIIIIIIII III III II II I1I111 II III III 00771838202000476740100107 AGREEMENT AGREEMENT,made and entered into this K day of 1 , ,by and between NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT,an irrigation distract organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Idaho,hereinafter referred to as the"District,"and THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,a political subdivision and municipality of the State of Idaho hereinafter referred to as the"City," W IT NE SSETH: WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into a Master Pathway Agreement For Developing and Maintaining Pathways for public use along and across some of the District's ditches and within some of the District's easements and fee title lands dated December 19,2000,recorded as Instrument No. 100102999, records of Ada County, Idaho,hereinafter referred to as the"Master Pathway Agreement;"and, WHEREAS, the District and the City intended by entering the Master Pathway Agreement to accomplish the following in a manner that is consistent with their respective legal and fiduciary responsibilities;to enhance the City's pathway planning though early consultation between the City and the District;to establish a process for the City's submission of pathway requests and the District's consideration of such requests; and to provide the general conditions for the District's approval and authorization of pathway requests affecting the District's ditches,property,operations and maintenance;and, WHEREAS, the District grants to the City the right develop pathways to encroach within the District's easements along and across the District's ditches,canals and easements therefor upon the terms and conditions of said Master Pathway Agreement and after the execution of an agreement for each proposed crossing and encroachment;and, WHEREAS,the City is the owner of the real property easement/right of way(burdened with the easement of the District hereinafter mentioned)particularly described in the"Legal Description"attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference made a part hereof;and, WHEREAS,the District controls the irrigation/drainage ditch orcanal]mown as the RIDENBAUGH CANAL(hereinafter referred to as"ditch or canal") together with the real property and/or easements to convey irrigation and drainage water,to operate and maintain the ditch or canal, and which crosses and intersects said described real property of the City as shown on Exhibit B attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof;and, AGREEMENT-Page I TO hf,&VAAF" ESMfi 21DU0 002D Mt �- 1N --011 -1 AGREEMENT 20 AGREEMENT,made and entered into this 10th day of March ,20 by and between NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT,an irrigation district organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Idaho,hereinafter referred to as the"District,"and THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,a political subdivision and municipality of the State of Idaho hereinafter referred to as the"City," WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into a Master Pathway Agreement For Developing and Maintaining Pathways for public use along and across some of the District's ditches and within some of the District's easements and fee title lands dated December 19,2000,recorded as Instrument No. l 00102999, records of Ada County,Idaho,hereinafter referred to as the"Master Pathway Agreement;"and, WHEREAS, the District and the City intended by entering the Master Pathway Agreement to accomplish the following in a manner that is consistent with their respective legal and fiduciary responsibilities;to enhance the City's pathway planning though early consultation between the City and the District;to establish a process for the City's submission of pathway requests and the District's consideration of such requests; and to provide the general conditions for the District's approval and authorization of pathway requests affecting the District's ditches,property,operations and maintenance; and, WHEREAS, the District grants to the City the right develop pathways to encroach within the District's easements along and across the District's ditches,canals and easements therefor upon the terms and conditions ofsaid Master Pathway Agreement and after the execution of an agreement for each proposed crossing and encroachment;and, WHEREAS,the City is the owner of the real property easement/right of way(burdened with the easement of the District hereinafter mentioned)particularly described in the"Legal Description"attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference made a part hereof;and, WIIDREAS,the District controls the irrigation/drainage ditch or canal!mown as the RIDENBAUGH CANAL (hereinafter referred to as"ditch or canal") together with the real property and/or easements to convey irrigation and drainage water, to operate and maintain the ditch or canal, and which crosses and intersects said described real property of the C ity as shown on Exhibit B attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof;and, AGREEMENT-Page L WHEREAS,the City desires approval to construct, install,operate and maintain an asphalt paved pathway within the District's casement for the Ridenbaugh Canal under the terms and conditions of said Master Pathway Agreement and those hereinafter set forth, NOW,THEREFORE,for and in consideration of the premises and of the covenants,agreements and conditions hereinafter set forth and those set forth in said Master Pathway Agreement, the parties hereto agree as follows: I. The City may construct,operate,maintain and repair a 10 foot wide asphalt pathway within the District's real property and/or casement for the Ridenhaugh Canal in Caven Ridge Estates West Subdivision No.2,located southeast of the intersection of Victory Road and Meridian Road,Meridian,Ada County,Idaho. 2. Any construction, widening or crossing of said ditch or canal shall be performed in accordance with the"Special Conditions"stated in Exhibit C, attached hereto and by this reference made part thereof. 3. The permitted hours of use of the pathway shall be from one half hour before sunrise and one half hour after sunset. 4. The parties hereto incorporate in and make part of this Agreement all the covenants, conditions, and agreements of said Master Pathway Agreement unchanged except as the result of the provisions of this Agreement. The covenants, conditions and agreements herein contained and incorporated by reference shall constitute covenants to run with,and running with, all of the lands of the City described in said Exhibit A, and shall be binding on each of the parties hereto and on all parties and all persons claiming under them or either of them, and the advantages hereof shall inure to the benefit of each of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the District has hereunto caused its corporate name to be subscribed by its officers first hereunto duly authorized by resolution of its Board of Directors and the City has hereunto subscribed its corporate name to be subscribed and its seal to be affixed thereto,all as of the day and year herein first above written. IRA, NAMPA&MERIDIAN 1RRIGATION DISTRICT OFF/ L z � r v By � T y Its President ATTEST: Its Secretary AGREEMENT-Page 2 TIE OF MERIDIAN By 4aSr,�en a u°�Sr, A E N; SEAL STATE OP I O ss: County of C on ) g& On this 0. day of � ,-2f9,,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally Y, of � Daren R.Coon,known to me to be the President and Secretary,respectively, of N��VWWZd IRRIGATION DISTRICT, the irrigation district that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that such irrigation district executed the same. IN W ITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal,the day and year in this certificate first above written. ELKE ADAMS . COMMISSION #2018-9017 — —' Notary Public for Idaho NOTARY PUBLIC Residing at Na.m Idaho STATE OF LDAHO My Commission Expires: G-xt — Zs Z,�- - STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss: County of Ada ) Tf•'zc� On this 0- -day of y before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared and C%wAt.-3!!�� ,known to me to be the V&AzqtAf-- and [j,t_�.r` ,respectively,of The CITY OF MERIDIAN,the entity that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that such entity executed the same. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my ha d affixed my official seal,the day and year in this certificate first abo �tr/• No ry c for tI��C� caF �,JA.4;v IX.,COMMIt381UN;%• Rtss 'n t t,/ �ry�p,� , No.42W �',,�,r My Commission Expires: AGREEMENT-Page 3 THE CITY OF MERIDIAN By___FORM F- SIM15ON ATTEST: 1AM0 R Cflj;�� )OIttGON, STATE OF IDAHO ) ss: County of Canyon ) On this day of ,20 ;before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared Donald Barksdale and Daren R.Coon,known to me to be the President and Secretary, respectively, of NAMPA& MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT, the irrigation district that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that such irrigation district executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal,the day and year in this certificate fast above written. Notary Public for Idaho Residing at ,Idaho My Commission Expires: STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss: County of Ada ) On this 1 Oth day of March ,2019,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson ,known to me to be the Mayor „-„ _ and cit('lerlr ,respectively,of The CITY OF MERIDIAN,the entity that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that such entity executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal,the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public far Trlahn Residing at __Meridian. Idaho , My Commission Expires: AGREEMENT-Page 3 EXHIBIT A Legal Description A right-of-way/easement within Caven Ridge Estates West Subdivision No.2 located in Section 30, Township 3 North,Range 1 East,B.M.,Ada County,Idaho and more particularly described in Exhibit A-1 attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. EXHIBIT B Location of Property/Canal See Exhibit C-1 attached hereto. EXHIBIT C Special Conditions a. The location and construction of the pathway shall be in accordance with Exhibit C-1, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. b. The District's easement along this section of the Ridenbaugh Canal includes a sufficient area of land to convey irrigation and drainage water,to operate,clean,maintain and repair the Ridenbaugh Canal, and to access the Ridenbaugh Canal for said purposes and is a minimum of 100 feet, 50 feet to either side of the centerline. C. Construction shall be completed one year from the date of this agreement. Time if of the essence. AGREEMENT-Page 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 264 of 366 �JRTHE GATEWAY •�•B J-U-BCOMPANIES GROUPON I MAINCPPING IF �J•U•B ENGINEERS,INC. EXHIBIT"A" CAVEN RIDGE ESTATES WEST SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 30,Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest section corner of Section 30,Township 3 North, Range 1 East,Boise Meridian,from which the west quarter corner of said Section 30 bears S00'25'44"W, 2642.97 feet; Thence S00°25'44"W,410.86 feet along the west line of said Northwest Quarter of Section 30; Thence S89034'16"E,70.00 feet to the intersection of the east right-of-way line of South Meridian Road (Hwy 69)and the centerline of the Ridenbaugh Canal, being the southwest corner of Red Wing Subdivision (Book 105 of Plats at Pages 14405 through 14409, Records of Ada County, Idaho);Thence S44°08'28"E,0.88 feet along said centerline and the southwesterly boundary of said Red Wing Subdivision to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence S 44008'28" E,28.56 feet along said centerline and said southwesterly boundary; Thence S 00°18'21" W,42.84 feet departing from said centerline and said southwesterly boundary; Thence S 44°08'28" E, 143.90 feet; Thence S 47°23'11" E,40.63 feet; Thence S 48053'33" E,76.77 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve; Thence along said non-tangent curve to the left an arc length of 30.03 feet, having a radius of 197.61 feet,a central angle of 08°42'29",a chord bearing of S 53°41'29" E and a chord length of 30.01 feet; Thence S 58°27'02" E,24.68 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve; Thence along said non-tangent curve to the left an arc length of 30.56 feet, having a radius of 200.46 feet,a central angle of 08°44'05",a chord bearing of S 62014'01" E and a chord length of 30.53 feet; Thence S 67°00'33" E,65.50 feet; Thence S 69058'25" E,88.05 feet; Thence S 70014'18" E,56.85 feet; Thence S 70020'03" E,96.72 feet; Thence S 70°43'12" E,78.67 feet to the westerly boundary of Caven Ridge Estates West Subdivision No.1(Book 115 of Plats at Pages 17351 through 17357, Records of Ada County, Idaho); Thence S 19°22'56" W,20.00 feet along said westerly boundary; Thence N 70°43'12" W,70.00 feet departing from said westerly boundary; Thence N 70022'04" W, 100.00 feet; Thence N 70°14'34" W, 112.89 feet; Thence N 70°55'16" W, 119.94 feet; CAVEN RIDGE ESTATES WEST SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT Page 1 of 2 a 250 S.Beechwood Avenue,Suite 201,Boise, ID 83709 : 208-376-7330 w www.jub.com Exhibit A, page 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 265 of 366 l R ��U�■� THEGATEWAY J-U-BCOMPANIES �� GLAN PGUPGN MAPPING IN J•U•B ENGINEERS,INC. Thence N 57°31'52" W,81.21 feet; Thence N 44°08'28"W, 240.04 feet; Thence S 00°18'21" W,525.34 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve; Thence along said non-tangent curve to the left an arc length of 48.46 feet, having a radius of 78.63 feet, a central angle of 35°18'53",a chord bearing of S 15'17'05" E and a chord length of 47.70 feet; Thence S 30059'16" E, 16.45 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve; Thence along said non-tangent curve to the right an arc length of 67.41 feet, having a radius of 207.73 feet,a central angle of 18°35'35",a chord bearing of S 17°05'42" E and a chord length of 67.12 feet to the northerly line of Parcel"TIC 5" (Special Warranty Deed Instrument No. 113100373 and Warranty Deed Instrument No. 2016-120082, records of Ada County,Idaho); Thence N 86*01'49"W, 20.48 feet along said northerly line to the beginning of a non-tangent curve; Thence departing from said northerly line and along said non-tangent curve to the left an arc length of 55.96 feet,having a radius of 187.73 feet,a central angle of 17°04'47",a chord bearing of N 17°36'47" W and a chord length of 55.75 feet; Thence N 30°59'16" W, 15.31 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve; Thence along said non-tangent curve to the right an arc length of 60.05 feet, having a radius of98.63 feet,a central angle of 34°53'02",a chord bearing of N 15°17'27"W and a chord length of 59.12 feet; Thence N 00°18'21" E,616.79 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING,containing 0.70 acres,more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of Robert L. Kazarinoff, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. L Robert L. Kazarinoff,PLS 16642 oc ou Date O �9T• OF L. KA'1�` 11/22/2019 CAVEN RIDGE ESTATES WEST SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT Page 2 of 2 a 250 S.Beechwood Avenue,Suite 201,Boise,ID 83709 p 208-376-7330 w www.jub.com Exhibit A, page 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 266 of 366 24 19 EXHIBIT "B" 25 rf 30 Point of Beginning L 1 L3 L2 ` ND Centerline LO Ridenbaugh co `/`` Canal a? \�6 lF OF (. 01 U--� 11/22/2019 a N 1� Cn I Re vi ' I �n4.0' <9 4ba 'On I ��2 f, 0') I 1 N C, I �� 1 j� Pathway I u7 GV°den o C 79 Y�. C j Easement 25 30 w es S Ri 9e 2 4ba'�is;Fstpt o �lg ��•��`3 00 0'?CIO Nos 74 o C/) �16 I —20' I � c Pathway Easement a a J 0 s r' 0 100 200 L23 0 "TIC 5" (1 1 3 1 00373 and Scale in Feet 2016-120082) <o a wTH S DOCUMENT,AN. RIDASA DRAWINN8 INCORPORATED JUBP OJ'1 PATHWAY BMT OAVEN RIDGE ESTATES WEST SUBDIVISION N0. 2 AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SRVICE,S THE PROPRTY OF N JDB PpOJ.A:101&112 SHEET FOR ANyY OTHER PROJECTOWIS NOT TO BE USED.IN WHOLE ITHOUT HE EXPRESS WRITTENR PART DRAWN BY:JRE J.�B 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT AUTHORIZATION OF JLa ENGINEERS,Inc. DESIGN BY: J CHECKED BY RLK Located in the NW1/4 S.30,T.3 N.,R.1 E.,B.M. 1 of 2 ae J-U-B ENGINEERS,INC. City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho N01 REVISION DESCRIPTION I BYJA PHI DATE IAST UPDATED:112PRIlt MeridianZ ib4iltMAing Qj@I9$Ma1ch 10,2020— Page 267 of 366 EXHIBIT "B" Line Table Line Table Line # Direction Length Line # Direction Length L1 S00°25'44"W 410.86' L13 S70°20'03"E 96.72' L2 S89'34'16"E 70.00' L14 S70'43'12"E 78.67' L3 S44'08'28"E 0.88, L15 S19'22'56"W 20.00' L4 S44'08'28"E 28.56' L16 N70'43'12"W 70.00' L5 S00'18'21"W 42.84' L17 N70'22'04"W 100.00' L6 S44'08'28"E 143.90' L18 N70'14'34"W 112.89' L7 S47'23'11"E 40.63' L19 N70'55'16"W 119.94' L8 S48'53'33"E 76.77' L20 N57'31'52"W 81.21' L9 S58'27'02"E 24.68' L21 N44'08'28"W 240.04' L10 S67`00'33"E 65.50' L22 S30'59'16"E 16.45' L11 S69°58'25"E 88.05' L23 N86'01'49"W 20.48' L12 S70'14'18"E 56.85' L24 N30'59'16"W 15.31' Curve Table Curve # Length Radius Delta Chord Bearing Chord Length C1 30.03' 197.61' 8'42'29" S53'41'29"E 30.01' C2 30.56' 200.46' 8'44'05" S62'14'01"E 30.53' C3 48.46' 78.63' 35'18'53" S15'17'05"E 47.70' C4 67.41' 207.73' 18'35'35" S17°05'42"E 67.11' C5 55.96' 187.73' 17'04'47" N17'36'47"W 55.75' C6 60.05' 98.63' 34-53'02" N15-17'27"W 59.12' 3 d G 3 9 3 u s fpl f OF Y 11/22/2019 m 3 $w a O THISREUSE ASA DMSIINOS JUBPP1&122_PATHWAY 9MT CAVEN RIDGE ESTATES WEST SUBDIVISION No.2 a AS ADOCUMENT. NSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERV E.INCORPORATED SO THE PROPERTY HEREIN'JNB PROD.tl'10.1&122 f SHEET "-. J-UZFOR IITHERPROJECTWI oTTOBEEUSED,IN WHOLE%PRESSWRITTENRPART, DRAWN By_ F�,�,8 CITY OF MERIDIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT AUTHORIZATION OF J-UB ENGINEERS,I- DESIGN BY: CHECKED BY:RLK Located in the NW1/4 S.30,T.3 N.,RA E.,B.M. 2 of 2 o J-U-B ENGINEERS,INC. City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho NO REVISION DESCRIPTION I BY PR DATE LAST UPDATED:ttQ2 1 Meridian Of+ hjLbA bedWrig Aj)AGIAEvlAh 10,2020- Page 268 of 366 r MERIDIAN ROAD (SH`69) o - - mm _O a° x� s `f S. PATTERN WAY I I 16, 1 / 1 l ' ''l'l m m zz I / z° m ° o / o ./ .... . 50''glp ; ASPpO141 �qFG/p n m o n my O m m � x z m p- m m m pU) 2` ' Z O A m N °20 y ' 'TI _ oW - m o 'o z O ._ r N � I.�Al�' Ex ibit C- , page 1 A 8 C D1 E 0 F v G H uS e v N e� N C wN u �C r �� ". %Q Z $b •• L m � _•` •• _ .. .... �u 2 p0 L^,a 5a s a a I� •. }� } g D SI g,,. .. �f�a€M ��}#s �3"P �[a i�Lga ,�m „$ s �• �� sm m y $•'7 �' � }aMg �; �+s�•]�� � $ � ��? a 30 3�i-� a$ �� m � � R 3 9 ►g � � FIN. (( a a a ! [ • $$ ( aa a� es �� 35��( P+'gtg=ailip .Hg " �q� L L� '•pL u L+�g.digLPION •gWgg i >yL.5Lf B� f 9 9 i.e��I O gg3 59: m $3$s g 8gad i_[ $_ygg �eg. M L d # yIf u °- - ��'}�.$ � �i°i � }gl aeFiipy ��}°q�'� �� ;s�3 a4a gdd a }#R gg3a aa8a �a �,. a s s (a i ; #S c� • z i -Iln99 °uig a A co1 ; z i 5-- D � n D r ` m , z € � g 0 0 E;9`� 88 �'R4v D n n�f RF 88 $' 8 1I $ § iaEPo" RIM 51F 4J w z z € E 4 °z jA a , iz 'soy 's _ E f tl Z z z aA � R ism Sn 39 CAVEN RIDGE ESTATES WEST 2 MRPeH a#�oN .�7'oHH! #i W66rch 02 0 Pa y� ��`� Exhibit C-1 , page 2 a c a D E F ° III G III H T -.7..... . . ......... .1- ........... ............... .. ......... ..... ... ......... .............. .......... ........ ............ ..................... ...... ...... ....................... .......... ------ -------- --n.- ......... . .... ...... .......... .... -------------- -------------- ................ . ...... .... t -------- . .................. R., -:4. 17710 1 5; 0 0 0 IT AgH Am Ali PO CAVEN RIDGE ESTATES WEST 2 r -oil IAA! 111j z o CE WIPMI�R City GGLIRGR Meet' g Agen--A larch a,* tVa:m166 P i I Exhibit c-1 , page 3 C-/WE IDIAN-- ITEM SHEET Council Agenda Item - 3.M. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 1 Title of Item - Resolution 20-2190: A Resolution Of The Mayor And The City Council Of The City Of Meridian, Waiving A Portion Of Certain City Of Meridian Permitting Fees For The Meridian Library District's Tenant Improvement Application To Construct The Unbound Library Branch At 722 E 2nd Street In Meridian; And Providing An Effective Date JIM ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Upload Date Resolution Resolution Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 272 of 366 CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO.20-2190 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT,BORTON, CAVENER, HOAGLUN,PERREAULT, STRADER A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, WAIVING A PORTION OF CERTAIN CITY OF MERIDIAN PERMITTING FEES FOR THE MERIDIAN LIBRARY DISTRICT'S TENANT IMPROVEMENT APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT THE UNBOUND LIBRARY BRANCH AT 722 E 2ND STREET IN MERIDIAN ; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Meridian Library District (MLD) is a Public Library District organized and operating pursuant to Idaho Code Title 33, chapter 27. WHEREAS, the City of Meridian (City) is a public entity organized and operating pursuant to Idaho Code Title 50. WHEREAS, MLD supports the Meridian community by providing access to information to enhance the Meridian area's educational success, economic development and overall quality of life. WHEREAS, MLD and City serve largely the same constituencies, comprised of the same taxpayers. WHEREAS, MLD owns a 3,800 square foot building at 722 E 2n1 Street in downtown Meridian where it intends to reinstate its unBound technology library and educational facility that will provide public access to emerging technology tools and resources to support small businesses. WHEREAS, in furtherance of MLD's mission to support our community by enriching lives, igniting curiosity, and cultivating connections, City is willing to waive certain "soft cost" portions of permitting fees of the Development Services Division related to MLD's tenant improvements at the unBound library branch. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY,IDAHO: Section 1. At such time that MLD or its agent makes application to the City for applicable permits necessary to construct the tenant improvements for its unBound library branch, the following percentage fee waivers shall be granted and shall otherwise reduce the amount of the permit fees assessed: BUILDING PLAN REVIEW FEE: 63%WAIVED ($2,007.93 WAIVED, est.) FIRE PLAN REVIEW FEE: 27%WAIVED ($396.90 WAIVED, est.) BUILDING PERMIT FEE: 100%WAIVED ($5,903.37 WAIVED, est.) RESOLUTION - 1 of 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020- Page 273 of 366 For illustrative purposes, the estimated dollar amount waived is based on an estimated tenant improvement value of$882,431.00. If the estimated tenant improvement amount is different, the actual amounts waived shall be based on the percentages of fee waived set forth in this Section 1. Section 2. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this loth day of March, 2020. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this loth day of March, 2020. APPROVED: ATTEST: Mayor Robert E. Simison By: Chris Johnson, City Clerk RESOLUTION - 2 of 2 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 3.N. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item -AP Invoices for Payment-02/28/20 -$134,257.95 ATTACHMENTS: load AP Invoices for Payment Cover Memo 2/28/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 275 of 366 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund AFLAC February 2020 AFLAC 3,542.73 01 General Fund CDW GOVERNMENT Palo Alto Prem Sup Rnw PA-500, Palo Alto Threat Prev 9,030.00 PA-3020 01 General Fund COONSE WELL DRILLING&PUMP CO 19-0314-Well Replacement Construction Jan 2020- 9,000.00 INC FINAL 01 General Fund DISCOVERY BENE-FLEX Flex February 2020 22,061.54 01 General Fund DISCOVERY BENEFITS-HSA HSA February 2020 2,065.50 01 General Fund IAFF LOCAL 4627 #4627 Firefighters Dues February 2020 7,260.03 01 General Fund NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT February 2020 Pre Tax Contributions 46,371.96 SOLUTIONS,INC 01 General Fund NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT February 2020 ROTH Contributions 13,875.43 SOLUTIONS,INC 01 General Fund UNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY #17426 February 2020 Contributions 143.34 01 General Fund WSCFF EMPLOYEE BENEFIT TRUST February 2020 MERP Contributions 3,700.00 Total 01 General Fund 117,050.53 60 Enterprise AFLAC February 2020 AFLAC 595.24 Fund 60 Enterprise DISCOVERY BENE-FLEX Flex February 2020 8,283.42 Fund 60 Enterprise DISCOVERY BENEFITS-HSA HSA February 2020 205.00 Fund 60 Enterprise NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT February 2020 Pre Tax Contributions 5,415.47 Fund SOLUTIONS,INC 60 Enterprise NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT February 2020 ROTH Contributions 2,673.29 Fund SOLUTIONS,INC 60 Enterprise UNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY #17426 February 2020 Contributions 35.00 Fund Total 60 Enterprise 17,207.42 Fund Report Total 134,257.95 Date:2/28/20 01:01:20 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 276 of 366 Page:1 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 3.0. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item -AP Invoices for Payment -03/04/20 -$177,621.79 Special ATTACHMENTS: DescriptiNIEL Qm oa AP Invoices for Payment Cover Memo 3/4/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 277 of 366 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount O1 General Fund JODI ST-MARTIN PerDiem:J.St.Martin,Nat'l League of 342.00 Cities,Washington,D.C. O1 General Fund SAFEBUILT LLC 20-0095 Mechanical Structural Plan Review 1/20200 150,535.66 O1 General Fund TIMOTHY HENDRICKSON PerDiem:T.Hendrickson,Nat'l League of 342.00 Cities,Washington,D.C. Total 01 General Fund 151,219.66 60 Enterprise IDAHO POWER 2204228288,Water Power January 2020 26,179.39 Fund 60 Enterprise TRACI HOOTS REFUND: WT/S/T: 127 E. IDAHO AVE CUSTOMER 222.74 Fund PAID AFTER CLOSING Total 60 Enterprise 26,402.13 Fund Report Total 177,621.79 Date:3/4/20 12:33:05 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 278 of 366 Page:1 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 3.P. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item -AP Invoices for Payment -03/11/20 -$827,974.2 ATTACHMENTS: DescriptiNIEL QR loa AP Invoices for Payment Cover Memo 3/5/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 279 of 366 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount O1 General Fund ADA COUNTY PARAMEDICS 220/4 CPR heartsaver cards,CPR program 80.00 O1 General Fund ADA COUNTY PARAMEDICS 220/9 Heartsaver CPR cards,CPR program 360.00 O1 General Fund AT&T MOBILITY LLC ATT First Net invoice 01/21 -2/20/20 630.31 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#2561B 147.00 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#28995C 94.00 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#29261B 94.00 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#29388B 107.00 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#29424B 238.00 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#29426B 323.00 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#29478C 179.00 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#29480C 196.00 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#30240B 144.00 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#30630B 96.00 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#30631B 133.00 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#3367B 236.90 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#40001C 54.00 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#40002C 54.00 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#40106C 65.00 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#40229C 196.00 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#40264C 243.00 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#40519C 65.00 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#40542C 54.00 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#40650C 94.00 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#40938C 133.00 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES,INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#40939C 280.00 O1 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC. 20-0012 FY20 Streetlight Repair Pole#41119C 196.00 O1 General Fund BODE TECHNOLOGY DNA Tests for PD#19-7264 1,295.00 O1 General Fund BOISE FITNESS EQUIPMENT Parts for Treadmill 45.00 O1 General Fund BOISE METRO CHAMBER OF COMMERC Boise Metro Chamb Ledrshp Conf Reg for 6- 2,394.00 04/26/20-04/28/20 O1 General Fund BPA HEALTH,INC. EAP Visits 502 Employees 2,063.22 O1 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Battery for UC Vehicle Lic#1A497NZID 171.00 O1 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil Change for Unit# 142 65.00 O1 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil Change for Unit# 61 55.00 O1 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil change,Crank Shaft Sensor for Unit#122 428.71 O1 General Fund BSN SPORTS, INC. pickleballs x 10; pickleball nets x 2 712.20 O1 General Fund CENTURYLINK CENTREX phone lines, Homecourt, FS#1 721.33 2/19/20-3/18/20 O1 General Fund CENTURYLINK Fuller Park Modem Service 2/10/20-3/9/20 147.61 O1 General Fund DYNA SYSTEMS screws,shrink tube, bolts,cut off wheels-qty 598 550.03 Date:3/5/20 01:19:50 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020- Page 280 of 366 Page:1 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund ELAINE CRISTELLA instructor fee-Vintage Furniture&Decor 2/15/20- 260.00 qty 5 01 General Fund EMILY GULL instructor fee-Preschool Fun/Plus 1/7-2/12/20-qty 30 940.00 01 General Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. 220/Fitting to repair water leak St.3 13.21 01 General Fund FRED PRYOR SEMINARS Fred Pryor renewal 2020 E Linan 199.00 01 General Fund GARRETT WHITE PerDiem:G.White,CommCtrs,Orem,UT 140.00 03/16/20-03/18/20 01 General Fund GEM STATE PAPER&SUPPLY CO 20-0018 1 cs joy dishwashing soap, 12 cs paper 821.38 towels,etc 01 General Fund GEM STATE PAPER&SUPPLY CO 20-0018 15 cs Angel Soft Bath Tissue 699.00 01 General Fund GEM STATE PAPER&SUPPLY CO 20-0018 Paper towel,dishwashing liquid,&other 2,296.43 supplies 01 General Fund GIESLER AUTO REPAIR fleet truck 1 repairs- license C20504 533.60 01 General Fund HAVIS INC DS-PAN-1202 DEVMT, DOCKST, PAN, 33T- 2,829.54 TS-PAN-1102 01 General Fund HENRY SCHEIN, Inc 220/Medical, EMS Cabinet for St. 6 1,370.30 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 220/Clear polycarbonate sheet to cover wall map St6 744.00 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 220/Equipment for basement training drills,tape, 63.76 lumber 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 220/St. 6,Screws,clips,stud finder to hang map cover 71.63 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 220/supplies for training prop, lock,plates,signs,wood 203.59 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Cell phone case replacement/K Pitt 17.46 01 General Fund IDAHO CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES Business card for Timothy Hendrickson 46.25 01 General Fund IDAHO HUMANE SOCIETY 20-0057 FY20 Id Humane Society Animal Control 43,378.00 Services 03/20 01 General Fund IDAHO POWER Fire Department Power- Feb 2020 2,737.81 01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Bannock Ridge,Sawtooth Development; Rezone, PUD, 103.38 CUP,Annex 01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Graycliff Estates; Mod Agreement, Prelim Platt 74.04 01 General Fund INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 2018 IFGC Study Guide Certificaiton 3 Smith 51.25 01 General Fund INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 2018 Mech. Insp Study Material Certification A Corrales 257.40 01 General Fund INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 220/2018 ICC Code books,qty 2 172.95 01 General Fund INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER battery for dump trailer 125.20 01 General Fund 3OHNSON CONTROLS FIRE Backflow Repair 484.30 PROTECTION LP 01 General Fund 3OHNSON CONTROLS FIRE Extinguisher Inspection 770.00 PROTECTION LP 01 General Fund 3OYCE GREEN instructor fee-Watercolor 1/7-2/14/20-qty 8 960.00 01 General Fund KANTOLA PRODUCTIONS, INC. Diversity&Inclusion Employee Combo Kit 4,130.00 01 General Fund KELLER ASSOCIATES,INC. 20-0096 Electrical Plans Examining Svcs- 1/2020 18,534.00 Date:3/5/20 01:19:50 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 281 of 366 Page:2 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund KNOX COMPANY 1YR.KnoxConnect Cloud License 21+ Devices 944.00 01 General Fund LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES Job posting: Comprehensive Assoc. Coordination 80.00 Planner 01 General Fund LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC. Level 3 Communications Telephone, 2/17/20-3/16/20 988.21 268238 01 General Fund LOWE'S Firearms Parts Storage 37.96 01 General Fund M.D.WILLIS,INC. 20-0104 Court Reporting February 2020 2,110.00 01 General Fund M2M WIRELESS Parks Modem Service 2/17/20-3/16/20 gnty 25 lines 285.54 01 General Fund MERIDIAN CHAMBER of COMMERCE C.Arial, Meridian Chamber Econ Excellence Luncheon, 25.00 03/12/20 01 General Fund MERIDIAN WINDOW TINT Door glass tinting(Mayors conference room&Council 411.00 offices 01 General Fund MINUTEMAN,INC. Replacement key for inspector file cabinet K Pitt 3.50 01 General Fund MOTIONS DANCE STUDIO instructor fee-Acro,Tumble,Flip,Twist,Li'INinja 2,144.00 1/6-2/14/20 01 General Fund MOTOROLA Multi Unit APX Portable Radio Charger 1,003.75 01 General Fund MOUNTAIN WEST, LLC landscape bark for all parks-qty 120 3,340.00 01 General Fund MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SVCS 220/4 pr Dyna fit suspenders for SCBA packs 206.96 01 General Fund O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 220/Shop supplies,ST. 5 120.93 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. 220/0.supp- Ptouch tape,badge cover,envelopes 30.10 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Missed Amt on Original Invoice 0.90 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC. Office Supplies: Binder Inserts 8.62 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC. Office Supplies: Joy Blue Pens 17.79 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Office Supplies: Legal Pads, Binder Clips, Lead, Paper, 175.65 Pens 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC. Office Supplies: White Binders,White Index Tabs 152.00 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Tabs Plan Review 9.40 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT,INC. Tray Organizer Qty. 1 5.99 01 General Fund OFFICE VALUE- MERIDIAN Coat Hook, Pens, Note Pads,Wipes,Tissue,Toner 653.39 01 General Fund OFFICE VALUE- MERIDIAN Hand Sanitizer for PD 73.99 01 General Fund ONCELL SYSTEMS INC Tour Buddy Yearly Standard 1,000.00 01 General Fund OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 220/Repair garage door St.5-carriage&pin 38.00 01 General Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Outlet Covers for K9 Bldg&Generator Heater @ PD 36.44 Admin 01 General Fund POWER SYSTEMS WEST 220/Annual generator Mtnc St.5 295.00 01 General Fund POWER SYSTEMS WEST 220/Annual generator Mtnc. St.4 295.00 01 General Fund PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT Tasers 5,650.00 01 General Fund RESERVE ACCOUNT 20474979 Postage Use, February 2020 1,147.50 01 General Fund RICOH USA,INC Print/Copies Plan Review RICOH S/N C86243745 41.22 Date:3/5/20 01:19:50 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 282 of 366 Page:3 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund RICOH USA,INC S/N C86276344; Copies-Black/White$92.46,Colored 392.91 $300.45 01 General Fund RICOH USA,INC SN C86084920; Credits given for Copier (364.74) 01 General Fund RUSSELL BRANDS LLC softballs-qty 936 2,950.56 01 General Fund SHRED-IT USA, LLC. 220/0.supplies shredding for fire St.2 35.14 01 General Fund SHRED-IT USA, LLC. Finance,Clerks, MUBS,Water February 2020 Shredding 115.50 01 General Fund SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE Netmotion Wireless NM Mobility Premium Maintenance, 1,029.06 Netmotio 01 General Fund SPARKLIGHT 220/Equipment Rental,Safehouse Digital Device Rental, 3.06 01 General Fund SPARKLIGHT 220/Equipment Rental,Station #4, 2/23/20-3/22/20 5.78 01 General Fund SPARKLIGHT 220/Equipment Rental,Station #5, 2/16/20-3/15/20 6.12 01 General Fund SPARKLIGHT City Hall Cable Service 02/16/20-03/15/20 56.18 01 General Fund SPARKLIGHT Fire Station #2, Equipment Rental, 2/16/20-3/15/20 6.12 01 General Fund STEVE SIDDOWAY PerDiem:S.Siddoway,ComCtrs,Orem,UT 140.00 03/16/20-03/18/20 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON 445964894489;Versa Desk Power Pro 40inch electric 420.00 height adj 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON 463595567747; Sabrent M.2 SSD to 2.5 inch SATA III 274.72 Aluminum 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON 463746564654; 220/Coffee pot St. 5 39.99 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON 465855476889; 220/Tape measure-admin,comp. 52.92 screen wipes 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON 847589693647; Magnetic Dry Erase board, Brochure 29.58 Holder 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Cork Bulletin Bar Strip, Pacon Privacy Boards 36.89 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Keyboard Wrist Rest,Wireless Keyboard and Mouse 36.98 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Received Date Stamp for A/P Desk 28.94 01 General Fund THE UPS STORE Postage to Send Evidence to Lab 58.25 01 General Fund TRANSUNION RISK&ALTERNATIVE TLOxp Charges&Credits 352.10 DATA SOLUTIONS 01 General Fund ULTRA TOUCH CAR WASH Full Service Car Wash for Unit# 525 13.56 01 General Fund UNIFORMS 2 GEAR New Hire Gear-Brandvolt 1,150.57 01 General Fund USSSOA 20-0048 volleyball officials for games 2/10-2/14/20- 1,412.58 qty 62 01 General Fund USSSOA 20-0199 basketball officials for games 2/3-2/14/20- 907.29 qty 14 01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. 965467287-00001 Data Plan #1, 1/21 -2/20/20 886.02 BELLEVUE 01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. 965467287-00002 Cellphones- 1/21/20-2/20/20 8,182.93 BELLEVUE Date:3/5/20 01:19:50 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 283 of 366 Page:4 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. 965467287-00003 Data Plan #2- 1/21/20-2/20/20 1,091.54 BELLEVUE 01 General Fund WEX BANK INC #0496-00-332449-8,2/29/2020_WEX_Bank 23,779.28 Total 01 General Fund 160,629.46 07 Impact Fund ESI,INC 19-0230, 20-0153, 20-0211 -220/St. 6, Pay application 409,813.81 Total 07 Impact Fund 409,813.81 20 Grant Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. 965467287-00002 Cellphones- 1/21/20-2/20/20 53.20 governmental BELLEVUE Total 20 Grant Fund 53.20 governmental 55 Capital STEPHANIE INMAN-TSOURMAS 19-0289 Task Order 10121.m Discovery Park Art 25,500.00 Projects Signage FINAL Total55 Capital 25,500.00 Projects 60 Enterprise ADVANCE AUTO PARTS Glass Cleaner,Armoral,Qty 2 11.48 Fund 60 Enterprise AIR EQUIPMENT CO Service to Portable Compressor,WO#277348 507.38 Fund 60 Enterprise AIR FILTER SUPERSTORE WHOLESALE HVAC Filters(16 qty) 126.12 Fund LLC 60 Enterprise AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS NO PO APWA Membership Renewal 4/01/20-3/31/21 2,775.00 Fund ASSOCIATION 60 Enterprise BACKFLOW SUPPLY 3/4in RP Backflow Assembly,Qty 2 540.46 Fund 60 Enterprise BILLING DOCUMENT SPECIALISTS 2020 Printing&Mailing of Flood Plan Brochures 326.75 Fund 60 Enterprise BLIMPIE-MOXIE JAVA Box lunches for WRRF Tour w/Councilwoman Strader 27.96 Fund (4 qty) 60 Enterprise BOISE RIGGING SUPPLY Service Truck Crane Inspection,C18131,WO#277241, 125.00 Fund 277242 60 Enterprise BUREAU OF OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE T.Hyslop App for Drinking Water Dist. Lic 25.00 Fund Date:3/5/20 01:19:50 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 284 of 366 Page:5 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise BUREAU OF OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE T.Hyslop IBOL App for WW Coll License 25.00 Fund 60 Enterprise CAREER UNIFORMS Embroidery City Logo on Uniforms,Qty 11 87.45 Fund 60 Enterprise CAREER UNIFORMS Embroidery City Logo to Uniform, M. Flesher,Qty 2 15.90 Fund 60 Enterprise CAREER UNIFORMS Embroidery City Logos to Uniforms,Qty 29 230.55 Fund 60 Enterprise CENTURYLINK CENTREX phone lines, Homecourt, FS#1 623.24 Fund 2/19/20-3/18/20 60 Enterprise CH2M HILL ENGINEERS, INC 18-0070, 19-0101 WRRF Cap. Exp. Process Cntrl Svc 27,500.76 Fund to 1/24/20 60 Enterprise CH2M HILL ENGINEERS, INC 20-0038 Wonderware software replacement evaluation 1,220.79 Fund (6.5 hrs) 60 Enterprise CH2M HILL ENGINEERS, INC 20-0194 WRRF Post Aeration Improvememts Svc to 517.61 Fund 1/24/20 60 Enterprise CH2M HILL ENGINEERS,INC 20-0203 Pilot SCADA service city hall(2.25 hrs) 454.12 Fund 60 Enterprise COLE INDUSTRIAL,INC. Labor&nparts to repair boiler 2 at digester 4&5(5 1,683.42 Fund hrs) 60 Enterprise COLUMBIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY AC drive for VFD1 at Oaks lift station (1 qty) 3,309.45 Fund 60 Enterprise COMMERCIAL TIRE Flat Tire Repair,C18131,WO#286076 46.00 Fund 60 Enterprise CORE&MAIN LP 1/2in Qtr Turn Ball Valve, Brass Nipple,Qty 13 36.44 Fund 60 Enterprise CORE&MAIN LP Locking Valve Debris Caps,Qty 20 1,175.00 Fund 60 Enterprise CUE'S INC Y eliminator for CCTV Van 1 camera 717.52 Fund 60 Enterprise D&B SUPPLY Thermometer for chem feed bldg (1 qty) 4.99 Fund 60 Enterprise DENNIS PATTON Reimb:D.Patton,Water Tx 1 App Fee, Exam&License 117.00 Fund 60 Enterprise DUBOIS CHEMICALS INC 20-0002 Ferric chloride(41,820 Ibs) 7,151.22 Fund 60 Enterprise EDGE ANALYTICAL, INC. IPDES testing(1 qty) 97.00 Fund 60 Enterprise EFREN GONZALEZ REFUND WT/S/T: 3240 S CANNON WAY TITLE 100.65 Fund COMPANY OVERPAID Date:3/5/20 01:19:50 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 285 of 366 Page:6 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL LLC PO#20-0019,Special Sampling @ 1127 Lighting PI 156.00 Fund 60 Enterprise EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL LLC PO#20-0019,Special Sampling @ Well 19, 1,173.00 Fund WO#269909 60 Enterprise EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL LLC PO#20-0019,Special Sampling @ Well 19T, 1,173.00 Fund WO#269909 60 Enterprise FASTENAL COMPANY 16oz Spray Bottle,Qty 3 8.25 Fund 60 Enterprise FASTENAL COMPANY Nuts, Bolts,Qty 300,WO#GP17230 46.50 Fund 60 Enterprise FASTENAL COMPANY Washer, Bolts,Grinding Disc,Qty 43 41.69 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. 2020 Ferguson Roadshow,J.Allen, M. Losh 120.00 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. 2020 Ferguson Roadshow, M. Flesher, M. Hinrichs, M. 180.00 Fund Anderson 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. 2020 Ferguson Roadshow, M. Moreira, D. Schofield 120.00 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. CEU class for 2020 Ferguson Waterworks Roadshow 360.00 Fund 2/13/20 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. PO#20-0052, tin C2, 1.5in T2, lin,3/4in Meters,Qty 41,654.35 Fund 193 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. PO#20-0052, Replacement MXU's Single Port,Qty 108 18,109.44 Fund 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. REfund for Tapemate Carb Holesaw,Inv#0735934, (394.40) Fund Qty 2 60 Enterprise FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. Tapemate Carb Holesaw,Arbor,Qty 6 1,098.57 Fund 60 Enterprise FISHER SCIENTIFIC Ascorbic acid(2 qty) 318.30 Fund 60 Enterprise FISHER SCIENTIFIC Safety glasses(1 qty) 11.15 Fund 60 Enterprise FISHER SCIENTIFIC Syringes(1 cs) 190.83 Fund 60 Enterprise H&E EQUIPMENT SERVICES,INC. Forklift/telehandler training (3 qty) 450.00 Fund 60 Enterprise H.D. FOWLER COMPANY 3/4in Coupling,lin Setter,Trfc Rp Kt,Qk Disconnect 3,449.78 Fund Cap,Qty14 60 Enterprise HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1/2in Drive Socket Joint,Qty 1 10.97 Fund Date:3/5/20 01:19:50 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 286 of 366 Page:7 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Drill bit for shop(1 qty) 10.97 Fund 60 Enterprise HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Flat Bar,Tube for Signage @ Well Sites,Qty 10, 136.50 Fund WO#GP17230 60 Enterprise HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Swiffer Duster Refill,Sprayer, Extended Duster,Qty 5 45.87 Fund 60 Enterprise HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Well Site Signage,Qty 10,WO#GP17230 129.80 Fund 60 Enterprise HYDRO LOGIC INC 19-0121 TO 10625.f Well 15 Reconst Ph 2 Des to 9,554.34 Fund 01/17/20FINAL 60 Enterprise HYDRO LOGIC INC 19-0122 Well 15 Recon Phase 2 SDC Service to 3,791.00 Fund 1/17/20 60 Enterprise HYDRO LOGIC INC No PO Well 20B Assess&Recon, Pump&Chem Svc to 3,778.45 Fund 1/14/20 60 Enterprise IDAHO POWER 2202131047,WWTP Power- Feb 2020 45,580.19 Fund 60 Enterprise IDAHO POWER 2205167097 WWTP Power-Liftstations-FEB. 2020 3,325.08 Fund 60 Enterprise IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Legal Ad-Request for Quotes 71.76 Fund 60 Enterprise IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Sole Source Procurement between City of Meridian and 34.78 Fund Western 60 Enterprise INTERMOUNTAIN DESIGN,INC Coat hooks for 90.00 Fund C.Boggess,T.Otte,E.Bowers,T.G lock,2extra 60 Enterprise JUB ENGINEERS 19-0373 ACHD, Eagle Rd,Amity to Victory,W/S Impr. 2,093.30 Fund thru 2/1 60 Enterprise KELLER ASSOCIATES,INC. 20-0098 QLPE Reviews Svcs 1/1-31/2020 Turf Farm 870.00 Fund #1 3 sheets 60 Enterprise KELLER ASSOCIATES,INC. 20-0098 QLPE Reviews Svcs 1/1-31/2020 Verada 290.00 Fund Lving 1 sheet 60 Enterprise KELLER ASSOCIATES,INC. 20-0098 QLPE Reviews Services 1/1-31/2020 Gander 870.00 Fund Creek North 60 Enterprise KELLER ASSOCIATES,INC. 20-0098 QLPE Reviews Services 1/1-31/2020 Lupine 290.00 Fund Cove Sewer 60 Enterprise KELLER ASSOCIATES,INC. 20-0098 QLPE Reviews Services 1/1-31/2020 870.00 Fund Razzberry Point Vi 60 Enterprise KELLER ASSOCIATES,INC. 20-0098 QLPE Reviews Services 1/1-31/2020 Sulamita 290.00 Fund Church 60 Enterprise KENDALL FORD OF MERIDIAN Recall 19C07 Perfrmd,Engine 63.45 Fund Lube,Oil,Filter,Rotation,C21 113 Date:3/5/20 01:19:50 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 287 of 366 Page:8 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise LEGACY FEED&FUEL Refund Service to Stihl Equip, INV#2027538 (298.52) Fund 60 Enterprise LEGACY FEED&FUEL Service to Pressure Washer,WO#278102 118.99 Fund 60 Enterprise LEGACY FEED&FUEL Service to Stihl Equipment 298.52 Fund 60 Enterprise LEGACY FEED&FUEL Service to Stihl Equipment,WO#278100 173.05 Fund 60 Enterprise LORI J GOODWIN REFUND WT/S/T: 4637 N ELMSTONE AVE CUSTOMER 32.56 Fund PAID AFTER CLOSI 60 Enterprise LOWE'S 1/2in Impact Adapter,Qty 1 4.26 Fund 60 Enterprise MARSHAL LATHAM Reimb:M.Latham,Computer Mouse&USB 71.98 Fund 60 Enterprise MOTION&FLOW CONTROL PRODUCTS Nickel Plated Tube,Brs Union Tee,Well 22 Analyzer 21.32 Fund Rpr,Qty 4 60 Enterprise MOTION&FLOW CONTROL PRODUCTS Tubing&parts for repair chem feed line(180ft) 490.32 Fund 60 Enterprise MOUNTAIN WATERWORKS,INC PO#18-0530,OCCT Pilot Test 1,070.00 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Crack detection fluid(2 qty) 15.08 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Hinge for bldg box to house ear muffs in new blower 12.28 Fund bidg (1 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Marking Paint, Black,Qty 12 104.28 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Safety glasses(6 qty)&paper towels(1 cs) 93.66 Fund 60 Enterprise MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. Wrench sets&socket organizer trays(6 qty) 567.90 Fund 60 Enterprise MURRAYSMITH INC 19-0083 W&S Replacement-Gregory Lift Station thru 763.50 Fund 1/31 60 Enterprise MURRAYSMITH INC 19-0389 Watermain Repl. Hickory-Fairview Svc to 11,433.50 Fund 1/31/20 60 Enterprise NAPA AUTO PARTS Armoral,Qty 1gl 40.49 Fund 60 Enterprise NICK TAMBORNINI Reimb:N.Tambornini Initial Treatment, Dist, Exam, 242.00 Fund Water Trea 60 Enterprise NORCO Safety Vests,Qty 16 188.18 Fund Date:3/5/20 01:19:50 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 288 of 366 Page:9 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise OFFICE DEPOT, INC. 12 Vertical sign holders for MYAC recycle flyers 86.52 Fund 60 Enterprise OFFICE DEPOT,INC. 20 Frames for S. Deardorff, 1 Box 8.5X11 Paper for 112.73 Fund PW Office 60 Enterprise OFFICE DEPOT, INC. Cyan HP410A toner for S. Deardorff, Blue pens for P. 101.88 Fund Cotten 60 Enterprise OFFICE VALUE- MERIDIAN Coffee, Filters,Copy Paper,Qty 7 105.21 Fund 60 Enterprise OPTIV SECURITY INC Tempered Netowrks: HIPswitch 100g Hardware, 2 1,052.65 Fund Ethernet Ports 60 Enterprise OXARC,INC. PO#20-0022, Sodium Hypochlorite,Well 19,27,22, 2,580.00 Fund Qty 1500gl 60 Enterprise OXARC,INC. PO#20-0022,Sodium 3,425.00 Fund Hypochlorite,We1129,19,27,28,16Qty2000g I 60 Enterprise PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Mule tape to repair chem feed line(1 qty) 111.52 Fund 60 Enterprise POSTNET Backflow Feb 1st Past Due letters, Batch 1048,Qty 250 95.79 Fund 60 Enterprise PRIMO POWDERCOATING INC. Stand Coating, Drain Coating,Qty 4 90.00 Fund 60 Enterprise RESERVE ACCOUNT 20474979 Postage Use, February 2020 96.55 Fund 60 Enterprise RICOH USA,INC C86232612 C86232690 B/W&Color Pages Env&PW 183.80 Fund Printers 60 Enterprise ROCKY MOUNTAIN VALVES& Fuseable links for methanol for inventory(2 qty) 105.62 Fund AUTOMATIONS, INC. 60 Enterprise RUSH TRUCK CENTERS Service to Dump Truck,WO#282158 426.41 Fund 60 Enterprise SHRED-IT USA, LLC. Finance,Clerks, MUBS,Water February 2020 Shredding 97.65 Fund 60 Enterprise SIGNS, ETC Reflective Well Site Info Sign for Well 28A&B,Qty 2 171.46 Fund 60 Enterprise SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE Netmotion Wireless NM Mobility Premium Maintenance, 218.88 Fund Netmotio 60 Enterprise SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY Hard hats(5 qty) 120.00 Fund 60 Enterprise SPECIALTY PLASTICS&FAB, INC 3/4in Ball Valve,Qty 10 300.30 Fund 60 Enterprise SPECIALTY PLASTICS&FAB,INC Adapters,elbows, unions,couplings(19 qty) 112.13 Fund Date:3/5/20 01:19:50 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 289 of 366 Page:10 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise SPECIALTY PLASTICS&FAB, INC Nipple(6 qty) 13.94 Fund 60 Enterprise SPECIALTY PLASTICS&FAB,INC PVC Pump Shelf,Qty 1 178.75 Fund 60 Enterprise SULLIVAN REBERGER PO# 20-0003 March 2020 Lobbing Fees 3,000.00 Fund 60 Enterprise SYNCB/AMAZON 435777464959; HDMI Cable for PW Conference Rooms 13.88 Fund 60 Enterprise SYNCB/AMAZON 454843789884; Cell phone mount for M.Jones vehicle 18.99 Fund C19841 60 Enterprise SYNCB/AMAZON 459553997978; Idaho State Flag fy20,Qty 1 52.99 Fund 60 Enterprise SYNCB/AMAZON 933787863446; Noz for inv&to repair spray bar(6 64.32 Fund qty) 60 Enterprise TC SALES&SERVICE Pump tubes for inventory&to repair ferric pump(6 431.13 Fund qty) 60 Enterprise TELANSWER,INC 3/1/20-3/31/20 After Hours Service 147.00 Fund 60 Enterprise THE UPS STORE Shipping to repair motor housing&transmission on 124.99 Fund camera 60 Enterprise THE UPS STORE Shipping to send pump in for repairs(1 qty) 101.71 Fund 60 Enterprise ULINE, INC. Stainless Steel Cleaner,Qty 4 44.21 Fund 60 Enterprise ULINE, INC. Thermal Labels for Inventory,Qty 12 195.08 Fund 60 Enterprise USA BLUEBOOK Anti-Seize Grease,Hydrnt Oil,Mrkng Pnt,BI,Gr, 1,280.60 Fund Reagent,Qty25 60 Enterprise USA BLUEBOOK Hach Silica Reagent Set LR, HR,Qty 4 323.64 Fund 60 Enterprise USA BLUEBOOK Spare pump assy for chem feed pumps(2 qty) 242.46 Fund 60 Enterprise VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. 965467287-00001 Data Plan #1, 1/21 -2/20/20 1,702.52 Fund BELLEVUE 60 Enterprise VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. 965467287-00002 Cellphones- 1/21/20-2/20/20 2,678.60 Fund BELLEVUE 60 Enterprise VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. 965467287-00003 Data Plan #2- 1/21/20-2/20/20 136.62 Fund BELLEVUE 60 Enterprise VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. Water Dept Modem Emergency Communications 1/24- 7.64 Fund BELLEVUE 2/23/20 Date:3/5/20 01:19:50 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 290 of 366 Page:11 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise WESTERN STATES AUTOMATION, LLC Fall Port Ball Valve, Rotork Electric Actuated,Well 22,23 946.87 Fund 60 Enterprise WEX BANK INC #0496-00-332449-8,2/29/2020_WEX_Bank 5,192.24 Fund Total 60 Enterprise 231,977.81 Fund Report Total 827,974.28 Date:3/5/20 01:19:50 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 291 of 366 Page:12 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item - 3.Q. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 0 Title of Item -AP Invoices for Payment -03/05/20 -$76.00 ATTACHMENTS: DescriptiQRloa AP Invoices for Payment Cover Memo 3/5/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 292 of 366 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment-Invoices for Payment- Eunice Fund Code Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund ROBERT SIMISON PerDiem:R.Simison,Nat'l League of Cities Con, 76.00 WashingtonD.C. Total 01 General Fund 76.00 Report Total 76.00 Date:3/5/20 02:16:25 PM Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 293 of 366 Page:1 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item -4.A. Presenter: Vincent Koontz Estimated Time for Presentation: 15 Title of Item - Mayor's Office: Update on Current Citywide Strategic Plan ATTACHMENTS: loa Memo to Council Cover Memo 3/6/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 294 of 366 Mayor Robert E. Simison E IDIAN� Treg BeCity Council Members: rnt Brad Hoaglun Joe Borton Jessica Perreault U A ri O Luke Cavener Liz Strader March 4th 2020 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Robert E Simison, City Council FROM: Vincent Koontz— Strategic Performance Analyst RE: March 2020 High Priority Strategic Plan Objective Update The following is a brief update on our remaining in progress high priority updates for our current 2016- 2020 Strategic Plan. The specific Objective updates are categorized under each Strategic Focus Area that they are assigned to. The information updated will be as follows: • Priority updates to Council/Mayor from Strategic Analyst and Objective Lead. • Items preventing action on tactics. • Percentage complete and remaining tasks or tactics. • Anticipated completion date or change in completion date. Focus Area: Strategic Growth Objectives: 1.A.1 - Support Downtown Development and the execution of the Destination Downtown Plan by the Meridian Development Corporation. • Old Town Lofts is on track for a Winter 2021 opening • Union 93 (Formerly Meridian Station)passed the height exception before the P&Z commission. • Continuing work with MDC on parking options and parking policies in downtown. • Estimated complete at the end of the plan period. 1.B.2 -Identify priority growth areas and incentivize growth and development. • The priority growth areas are in the initial phases as the Mayor's Office has presented an initial map to City Council. The intention is to refine and use this tool to give Council and our development community clarity into where the city would like to grow first. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 295 of 366 • The incentives committee needs to be convened in order to identify incentives in those priority areas. Caleb will be working on that in the near future. 1.C.1 -Ensure area of City Impact Boundaries are consistent with infrastructure plans, service boundaries and growth goals. • Amendment to Title 9 of Ada County Code in progress. Hearings will likely be held in summer of 2020 to ratify service boundaries/AOCI. • We will continue to consult with Star on the northern boundary, but will likely need to annex or come to a similar agreement with Star to prevent intrusion into our area of impact. • The objective will be complete once Ada County accepts the new boundaries estimated this summer. 1.C.3 -Identify and assess the feasibility of areas within the Area of City Impact that could be preserved for open space, historical significance, or cultural heritage. • Staff is working on tactic 1 (Open Space Survey) with Boise State University to administer the survey. • Our goal is to gather feedback from our citizens in order to get their thoughts on what open space means to them and educate the public on what types of open space exist and how to prioritize and fund open space in Meridian. • The survey is ready, we will be sending out to the community during March. • Close and analyze the results in April • Report the results by the end of April or May. • Should be completed or close to complete by the end of the plan period. Focus Area: Economic Vibrancy Objectives: 2.A.1 -Identify, develop and utilize the tools needed for successful attraction and retention of jobs. • This objective will be updated with the industry and workforce analysis being completed by Leland consultants as a follow up from the Comprehensive Plan. • KPI's on this objective have been developed and were presented to Council as part of Economic Development's annual update. • This objective has been moved out to the end of August of this year based on estimates from the consultant. 2.A.3 -Promote job growth by identifying and attracting businesses that are aligned with the Comprehensive Plan's Industry Analysis. • This objective will be aligned with both the industry and growth priorities discussions that are ongoing with objective I.B.2 and 2.A.1. • Staff is working to identify unentitled sites available for development that are identified in the Comp Plan. • Staff is additionally working to engage property owners/representatives to discern their willingness to develop and sell their properties. • Staff will support and work to attract entities to develop private/nonprofit industry clusters. • Moved this objective out to August to align with the above objective. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 296 of 366 Focus Area: Responsive Government Objectives: 3.B.4 -Develop an employee engagement program • Existing programs are being evaluated for this budget year along with possible future programs in preparation for FY21 budget. • The objective is set to be complete by April with the last remaining tactic to be completed by approximately that date. 3.D.1 —Align resources, systems and employees to meet strategic objectives and priorities. • Current Plan is over 70% complete with 27 objectives completed. • We are currently in the Visioning and Evaluation phase of our next strategic plan framework. We will be finishing the second session of director and council meetings this next week. • Some objectives could carry over or be repurposed with the next plan. • We are at 85% complete, final tactic is to evaluate the plan and report to Council early next year. • Anticipated completion date is 12/31/20—the end of the calendar year. 3.D.2 -Develop and deploy a City-Wide performance measurement, monitoring and reporting program. • Departments have found preliminary key indicators and reported to Council late last year. • We will work this year to refine, align and develop key indicators and outcomes in alignment with our new strategic planning effort. • We initially thought the Open Gov Platform used for our financial metrics could be a useful tool to use to report our data,but further research would have placed an undue burden on our staff to analyze data. • The Strategic Analyst will be exploring other reporting tools for our city wide metrics in the near future. The IT department developed a reporting platform for Public Works, so we will review the internal platform as well. • Based on those changes I will be moving out this objective until the end of the plan period or into the next plan. 12/31/2020. 3.D.3 —Develop and deploy a City-Wide continuous improvement program. • We have trained 35 employees in process improvement basics with our own staff training them. • We have two departmental innovation teams (6 individuals per) (Com Dev and Finance)that have produced over 25 process improvements. • The Strategic Analyst will be working closely with departments to examine opportunities for innovation and process improvements in their departments that will be higher impact and effort. • We will report to Council the progress and improvements made later this year in a report. • We are 50% complete with the objective and we will be expanding our training program to an advanced training and a"train the trainers"training later this year. • The objective will be completed at the end of this year, with some carryover likely into the next plan. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 297 of 366 Focus Area: Safe, Healthy and Secure Objectives: 4.A.4—Deploy programs and identify gaps to enhance the community's perception of public safety. • Leadership group identified several current programs that have been evaluated for effective interactions. Those programs include MADC, SRO and Crime Prevention. • The community wide crime prevention programs have been developed and are in the process of being implemented. • Apartment Crime Prevention is in phase one with 8 communities participating. • Crime prevention and personal safety programs are now in progress • Tactic 6—Related to Training Gaps,policies and procedures is now complete. • Joint Training Academy is up and running • Policy and Procedure Development is up and running. • Our training software was purchased and is currently being implemented as part of this tactic. • Our PIO has developed a detailed communications plan and is currently being executed. • Drug education, internet safety courses are currently being evaluated and modified as we bring new SME's onboard. • Traffic Safety is awaiting the 2018/2019 report to evaluate those strategies. • We are moving out the objective to September 2020 based on the SRO programs and reporting for traffic safety improvement. The objective is now 70% complete with two tactics remaining. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 298 of 366 9 � 4 5.. 00 rN it L6 ■r - � . LADIA i0L ti . r r gy `y EAeCUtIOVI 60% 4 r e ? t� Plea Completion - 73 #MYMERIDIAN *Wt ter. I• i— own, 1l71 1 i1 l ii ��� _ :� __ � �;� c; �������N ��L ;i=� � it f I f®II �'i 4� � Yi � 1 ���, �r na^ ,. IA �_uGxy _ ��, � �1.. Ir"� � I;� \. is ,.. '� �. y " �� \\l ww (m* Mitigation ml Recovery ImPreparedness Response f .ti M !I September .10m. " - Council status update .9 A • What objectives should carry over into the next plan? • Which objectives are still relevant? • What was achieved? • What outcomes resulted? 4101� 17 0 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item -4.13. Presenter: Estimated Time for Presentation: 10 Title of Item - Consideration of Approval of the Union Urban Renewal District Eligibility Report and Corresponding Resolution (No. 20-2188) ATTACHMENTS: Milo Descriptio Typ loa Memo to Council Cover Memo 3/5/2020 De-annexation and New Plan Guidelines Backup Material 2/24/2020 Eligibility Report Staff Report 3/9/2020 MDC Resolution Backup Material 3/9/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 299 of 366 E IDIAN,-�' Community Development Dept. I DA H 0 Meridian City Hall, Suite 102 33 E. Broadway Avenue Community Development Meridian, Idaho 83642 Department MEMORANDUM DATE: March 5, 2020 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Cameron Arial, Community Development Director RE: Union District Eligibility Report and New Union District Plan Memo Dear Mayor and Council, At the request of the Meridian Development Corporation (MDC) and the continued downtown redevelopment efforts, below is a brief summary of the Union District Eligibility Report and New Union District Plan (Report),the project timeline and the corresponding Resolution for your consideration. For a detailed review, each of these documents are included in your packet. REPORT SUMMARY Galena Opportunity Inc. (Galena),the Civic Block RFP winner, has funded this Report from Kushan Associates and SMR Development, LLC(Consultants) and received approval and adoption from the MDC Board.The intent of the Report is to describe the eligibility to deannex certain properties from the Downtown District and establish a new urban renewal district(Union District)within the City in order to fund certain improvements using tax increment revenues generated from Galena's developments.The approval of both the MDC Board and the City Council is required. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the report and agrees with the Consultants that the proposed Report is consistent with passed MDC urban renewal activities, adheres generally to the City's vision of downtown redevelopment and qualifies for deannexation and district creation. See Criteria Analysis on Page 15 of the report. DECISION Staff recommends adoption of the Report and approval of the corresponding resolution. Based on the project timeline, approval at the March 101" meeting will facilitate the timely enactment of the District. Please note the Report and Resolution is just the first step in the process.The Resolution merely accepts the Report and directs that MDC prepare the new URA Plan. Per the timeline,there will be a public hearing on the Plan in June,with a corresponding Ordinance de-annexating the area and creating the new plan. Staff is also aware of potential Urban Renewal legislation, but it is staff's understanding that these proposed pieces of legislation would not impact the implementation of the Union District. Sincerely, 100-j--144— Cameron Arial, MPA, Ph.D. Community Development, Director Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 300 of 366 MDC TIMELINE FOR CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF PLAN AMENDMENT TO DEANNEX AND NEW PLAN AREA PUBLIC MEETINGS ARE HIGHLIGHTED DATE TASK—NEW PLAN NOTES RE: NEW TASK—DE- NOTES RE: Responsible PLAN ANNEXATION FROM DEANNEXATION Party DOWNTOWN PRO- JECT AREA November- Identify geographic area to Done Identify and finalize par- Done December be reviewed for eligibility cels to be deannexed from 2019 the Downtown Area Retain consultant to prepare Done Meet and confer with Ada Done eligibility report County to determine in- crement value of each par- cel to be deannexed Work on map to be included In progress Determine significance of Done with the eligibility report impact to revenue stream and consider whether up- dated financial feasibility study sary Obtain values: base values Done Retain surveyor to create Maps/legal descrip- for existing RAAs and the boundary map/legal de- tions required [Ida- new area and current values scription for properties re- ho Code 50- for the City moved; overlay over exist- 2907(1)/Idaho Code ing District boundaries 63-215/IDAPA Rule 225] Done—Need to confirm sta- tus/timing of parcel split. 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 301 of 366 Retain financial consultant to prepare updated finan- cial feasibility study (Amended Attachment 5), for Downtown Project Ar- ea 02/2020 Eligibility report drafted In progress Send map/TIF value im- Follow up with pact information to any MDC counsel con- applicable develop- cerning existing ers/lenders for consent(if OPAs and/or bonds necessary) where consent or financial impact analysis may be necessary Prepare Agency resolution Begin to work on drafting MDC Counsel may approving the eligibility re- lender consent/amendment be lead on this task; port documents (if necessary) confirm Wed.,Feb. Agency Board approves the 26, 2020 eligibility report Prepare City Council resolu- tion approving the eligibility report Tues., City Council approves eligi- March 10, bility report 2020 Work on drafting the new Work on drafting plan plan amendment to deannex parcels from Downtown Project Area Early Outreach with property own- Outreach with property March ers/developers and other in- owners/developers and terested parties including tax- other interested parties fin- ing entities on the content of cluding taxing entities on the new urban renewal plan the content of the urban renewal plan amendment 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 302 of 366 Identify/retain consultant to prepare RAA boundary map and legal description Preparation of boundary map Continue to work on prepa- In progress and legal description ration of boundary map and legal descri tion Identify/retain consultant to prepare the economic feasi- bility stud Preparation of Attachment 5 Continue to work on prepa- [economic feasibility study] ration of Amended At- for new plan: tachment 5 [economic fea- +Identify/confirm the over- sibility study] for Down- lapping/affected taxing dis- town: tricts +Identify/confirm the over- +Identify/confirm levy rates lapping/affected taxing dis- +Identify/confirm assessed tricts values for City and the RAA +Identify/confirm levy [10% limitation] rates +Prepare TIF revenue pro- +Identify/confirm assessed jections (including estimates values for City and the of levy rate and area assessed RAA [10% limitation] values) +Prepare TIF revenue pro- +Identify projects/expenses jections (including esti- mates of levy rate and area assessed values) +Identify ro'ects/ex enses Continue to work on drafting Continue to work on draft- the new plan ing the plan amendment Wed., Distribution of rough draft of Distribution of rough draft March 11, the urban renewal plan to the of the urban renewal plan 2020 Agency Board amendment to the Agency - Continue to conduct Board outreach with inter- - Continue to con- ested parties includ- duct outreach with ing taxing entities on interested parties 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 303 of 366 the content of the including taxing en- Plan; tities on the content - Schedule Work Ses- of the Plan amend- sion with Agency ment; Board to review Plan - Schedule Work - Work on finalizing Session with Agen- map/legal cy Board to review - Work on finalizing Plan plan exhib- - Work on finalizing its/economic feasibil- map/legal ity study Work on finalizing plan exhibits/economic feasibil- ity stud Submit draft boundary Submit draft boundary map/legal description of the map/legal description of boundary of the RAA to the the boundary of the dean- State Tax Commission and nexed area to the State Tax County Assessor for prelimi- Commission and County nary review and tentative Assessor for preliminary approval review and tentative ap- proval Wed., Agency meeting—work ses- Agency meeting—work March 11, sion to review the plan session to review the plan 2020 amendment Week of City Council work session to City Council work session March 16th review the plan to review the plan amend- ment Revise plan to incorporate Revise plan amendment to comments from the work incorporate comments sessions from the work session(s) Wed., Prepare Agency Resolution Prepare Agency Resolution March 18, to approve the plan to approve the plan 2020 amendment Wed., Deliver final draft of the plan Deliver final draft of the March 18, and resolution to Agency for plan amendment and reso- 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 304 of 366 2020 consideration lution to the Agency Board for consideration Wed., Prepare letter from Agency Prepare letter from Agency March 18, to City formally submitting to City formally submitting 2020 Plan to the City plan amendment to the city Prepare public hearing notic- Prepare public hearing no- Idaho Code 50- es. Notices shall state time, tices. Notices shall state 2008(c) and 50- date, place,purpose of the time, date, place, purpose 2906(3) hearing, and map/boundary of the hearing, and descriptions ary descriptions Prepare transmittal letters Idaho Code 50-2906(3) Prepare transmittal letters Idaho Code 50- from the City to overlapping from the City to overlap- 2906(3) taxingdistricts in taxin districts Send draft legal descrip- Send draft legal descrip- tions/maps to Jeff Servatius tions/maps to Jeff Servatius at Tax Commission at Tax Commission Wed., Agency board meeting to Agency board meeting to Idaho Code § 50- March 25, consider the Plan for approv- consider the plan amend- 2905 2020 al ment for approval Follow up on status of any consents to deannexation Fri., March Formally transmit plan to the Transmit plan amendment 27, 2020 Cit to City Work on drafting ordinance Work on drafting ordi- nance 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 305 of 366 Consult with City Attorney Consult with City Attor- re City Procedures: ney/Staff re City proce- - Regular meet- dures ing/dates times; -Confirm regular meeting - Consolidation of or- dates/times dinance readings; and -Consolidation of ordi- - Scheduling meeting nance readings; with Planning &Zon- -Scheduling/confirming ing Board meeting with P&Z (Is a - Confirm delegation P&Z resolution required?) of tasks -Confirm delegation of tasks Confirm submission dead- Confirm submission dead- lines for legal notices with lines for legal notices with the Statesman the Statesman Thurs., Transmit plan to planning Confirm submission date Transmit plan amendment Confirm submission April 2, commission to P&Z to P&Z date to P&Z 2020 Draft and transmit proposed Draft and transmit pro- P&Z Resolution, if necessary posed P&Z Resolution, if necessary Thurs., P&Z meeting to review P&Z meeting to review April 16, Plan's conformity with the Plan amendment's con- 2020 general plan for the devel- fortuity with the general opment of the City as a plan for the development whole. Planning commission of the City as a whole. must submit its written rec- Planning commission must ommendations with respect submit its written recom- to the proposed plan to the mendations with respect to City within sixty days after the proposed plan to the receipt of the Plan for re- City within sixty days after view. receipt of the Plan amend- ment for review. Consult with City/confirm Consult with City/confirm date of public hearing and date of public hearing and final reading final reading. 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 306 of 366 Fri.,April Final public hearing notice. Final public hearing notice. Idaho Code 50- 24, 2020 Notice shall state time, date Notice shall state time, date 2008(c) and place of the public hear- and place of the public and 50-2906(3) ing to consider the Plan. Also hearing to consider the publish map/boundary de- Plan amendment. Also scription publish map/boundary de- scription NLT Fri., (Hand delivery) Transmittal Publish notice of the pub- (Hand delivery) Transmit- Publish notice of the May 1, of notice and plan and Agen- lic hearing in Statesman; tal of notice and plan public hearing in 2020 cy resolution re recommen- confirm paper will print amendment and Agency Statesman; confirm dations from the URA to notices on Fridays. resolution re recommenda- Statesman will print governing board of all over- tions from the URA to notices on Fridays. lapping taxing districts at Lead time work- governing board of all least 30 days prior to the date ing days prior to publi- overlapping taxing districts Lead time (_ of the public hearing but not cation)—Submit to at least 30 days prior to the working days prior more than 60 days prior to Statesman NLT Fri., date of the public hearing to publication)— the date set for final reading April 24, 2020 but not more than 60 days Submit to States- of the ordinance prior to the date set for fi- man NLT Fri., nal reading of the ordi- April 24, 2020 nance Fri., May 1, Publish notice of the public May 1 and 15 Publish notice of the public May 1 and 15 2020 hearing in a newspaper of hearing in a newspaper of eneral circulation 2xgeneral circulation 2x Final ordinance Final ordinance Planning Commission to Planning Commission to submit comments to City submit comments to City Council Council 7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 307 of 366 Tues., June City Council's first reading City Council's first reading Idaho Code 50- 21 2020 and public hearing of the or- and public hearing to con- 2008(d) and 50- dinance (determine whether sider ordinance to approve 2906(1) multiple readings will be plan amendment(deter- waived by the City) mine whether multiple readings will be waived by the City Council Tues.,June Second reading of the ordi- Second reading of the or- 9, 2020 nance dinance Tues.,June Third/final reading and pas- Third/final reading and 16, 2020 sage of the ordinance passage of the ordinance Following Publish ordinance summary Idaho Code 50-901 and Publish ordinance sum- Idaho Code 50-901 ordinance (with map and legal) 50-901A mary(with map and legal) and 50-901A adoption Following Record ordinance (with le- Idaho Code § 63-215 Record ordinance (with Idaho Code § 63-215 publication gal/map); separately record legal/map); separately rec- le al/ma cover sheet ord legal/ma cover sheet Following Transmit copies of the rec- Idaho Code 50-2907 Transmit copies of the rec- Idaho Code 50-2907 recordation orded ordinance, legal de- orded ordinance, legal de- scription and map to the fol- scription and map to the lowing and complete actions following and complete listed below: actions listed below: - county auditor - county auditor - county assessor(file - county assessor map and legal)* (file map and le- - county recorder(rec- gal)* ord map and legal)* - county recorder - affected taxing dis- (record map and le- tricts; and gal)* - state tax commission - affected taxing dis- (file map and legal)* tricts; and *Within 30 days of publica- - state tax commis- tion of the ordinance sum- sion(file map and mary legal)* *Within 30 days of publi- cation of the ordinance 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 308 of 366 summary Drop-dead Filing and recording of doc- Filing and recording of date for uments with the County re- documents with the County deannexa- corder, County Assessor, Tax recorder, County Assessor, tion: Mon., Commission, etc. Tax Commission, etc. July 27, 2020 Meridian City Council meeting schedule: lst, 2nd 3rd and 4th Tuesday, commencing at 6:00 p.m. (work sessions start at 4:30 p.m.) Meridian P&Z— 1st and 3rd Thursday of the month at 6:00 p.m. • March 5, 2020 • March 19, 2020 • April 2, 2020 • April 16, 2020 • May 7, 2020 • May 21, 2020 • June 4, 2020 MDC—2nd Wednesday of the month at 7:30 a.m.; 4th Wednesday of the month at 4:00 p.m. • December 11, 2019 • January 8, 2020 • January 22, 2020 • February 12, 2020 • February 26, 2020 • March 11, 2020 • March 25, 2020 • April 8, 2020 • April 22, 2020 4813-7950-0204,v.3 9 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 309 of 366 Union District Urban Renewal District Eligibility Report Prepared for Galena Opportunity Inc. Meridian Development Corporation City of Meridian February 2020 Kushlan I Associates SMR Development, LLC Boise, Idaho i Page Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 310 of 366 Introduction: Kushlan I Associates and SMR Development, LLC were retained by the Galena Opportunity Inc. to assist them in their discussions with the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Meridian, Idaho, also known as Meridian Development Corporation (the "Agency" or "MDC") and the City of Meridian (the "City") with regard to establishing a new urban renewal district in the City. The Mayor,with the confirmation of the City Council,has appointed nine members to the Agency Board to guide the development of urban renewal plans and oversee their implementation. The current membership of the Agency Board is as follows: Chair: David Winder Vice Chair Nathan Mueller Secretary Steve Vlassek Commissioners Dan Basalone Treg Bernt Diane Bevan Tammy de Weerd Kit Fitzgerald Rob McCarvel Urban Renewal Administrator: Ashley Squyres Idaho Code § 50-2006 states: "URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY. (a) There is hereby created in each municipality an independent public body corporate and politic to be known as the"urban renewal agency"that was created by resolution as provided in section 50-2005, Idaho Code,before July 1, 2011,for the municipality.."to carry out the powers enumerated in the statutes. The Meridian City Council adopted Resolution 01-367 on July 24, 2001 bringing forth those powers within the City of Meridian. The MDC currently oversees the implementation of two urban renewal districts. The Meridian Revitalization Plan is the original district, which focuses on the revitalization of the downtown (the "Downtown District"). It was established by the City Council's adoption of Ordinance No. 02-987 on December 3, 2002. The Downtown District is set to expire in 2026. The Urban Renewal Plan for the Ten Mile Road-A Urban Renewal Project(the"Ten Mile District")was created by the Meridian City Council on June 21, 2016 through the adoption of Ordinance No. 16-1695. It is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2036. 2 1 P a g e Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 311 of 366 1'.+94ffi 1 - �L AR ✓Ila fig,, mom® W p�, ^, rttID ---- e r ®� V 5v@ � _ _ _ ___ _ ____ 1 , l_______ �� I _ - l__ ,______ HJ I � LL177 - � 1 LC�L1 s( ® L Print Date:1 1/1/2019 User:bmcclure Background: The development of the community of Meridian started in the 188os and was originally located on a farm owned by the Onweiler family.A school was opened in 1885. The U.S. Postal Service established a mail drop along the Oregon Short Line Railroad and the site was named Hunter after its superintendent. Community activity grew around this mail stop focused on the railroad. In 1893 an Odd Fellows lodge was organized and called itself Meridian, acknowledging that it was located on the Boise Meridian the primary North-South survey benchmark for Idaho, and 1893 is generally regarded as the year of the City's founding. That name grew in primary use as the name of the settlement and the Village of Meridian was incorporated in 1903 with a population of approximately 200. Meridian's traditional economy focused on the support of the surrounding agricultural activities. A major creamery was established in the community in 1897 to support the nearby dairies. Fruit orchards were located throughout the area. 3 1 P a g e Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 312 of 366 Meridian was a significant stop on the Interurban electric railway from 1908 to 1928. This service provided convenient access for passengers and freight in both easterly and westerly directions. Throughout most of the loth century, Meridian remained a relatively quiet community focused on its agricultural roots. US Census Bureau data reflects a 1910 population of 619 people growing to 2,616 by 1960. However, starting in 1970 the pace of growth in Southwest Idaho quickened. Meridian's growth initially reflected, and then exceeded the regional growth rates by significant margins. Over the past twenty-five years the rate of growth has been startling by any reasonable standard. The following table reflects that population growth over the City's history. 1903 (Incorporation Estimate) 200 1910 619 1920 1,013 1930 1,004 1940 1,465 1950 2,081 1960 2,616 1970 6,658 1990 9,596 2000 34,919 2010 75,092 2019 (Estimate) 106,804 Cities across the nation actively participate in the economic vitality of their communities through investment in infrastructure. Water and sewer facilities as well as transportation and other systems are all integral elements of an economically viable community. With the significant growth rate and corresponding extension of infrastructure Meridian has a significant amount of capital maintenance and capital improvements looming on the near horizon. Title 50, Chapters 20 and 29, the Urban Renewal Law of 1965 and the Local Economic Development Act contain some of the few tools that are available to cities to help fund public improvements. New sources of State support are not likely to become available in the foreseeable future, thus the Agency's interest in exploring the potential for establishing their third urban renewal district is appropriate. Coupling that State support with the private sector investment potential created by the Opportunity Zone program created under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Tax Reform and further implemented by the IRS under Internal Revenue Code §140oZ-1 and §1400Z-2 could catalyze significant future revitalization. 4 1 Page Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 313 of 366 Demographics: According to the US Census Bureau, the estimated 2019 population of the City is io6,804 which is a 38.8% increase since 201o.This growth rate is more than three times of that experienced statewide which was 11.9% during that period. Meridian has been acknowledged as one of the fastest growing cities in the United States. At 28.5%, the City's percentage of people under 18 years of age exceeds the statewide percentage of 25.5% by 3.o%. The percentage of population under 5 years of age exceeds the statewide figure by 0.3% (6.9%vs. 6.6%). The percentage of the City's population over 65 years of age (12.1%) is less than the statewide percentage (15.9%) by 3.8%. These statistics reflect a population base that is considerably younger than that found statewide. Housing units are 76.2% owner-occupied as opposed to the statewide statistic of 69.2%. Median value of owner-occupied housing units is $221,30o as compared to $176,800 statewide. Monthly owner costs with mortgage is $1,381 as compared to the statewide figure of$1,195.Median gross rent in the City of Meridian is reported as $1,o16 as compared to $792 statewide. When income statistics are compared to statewide numbers, we see that the population of the City exceeds the rest of Idaho in these categories as well. The median household income in the City is $64,375, approximately 26% above the statewide figure of$5o,985. Per capita monthly income for the City's population is $29,857 as compared to the statewide number of $25,471. The percentage of the City's population below poverty level is 9.8% as compared to the statewide number of 11.8%. These statistics suggest that the City's population is in an enviable position as compared to many Idaho communities. However, the capital and service delivery demands presented by the startling level of growth,when considered in the context of the fiscal limitations on Idaho local government suggest that utilizing existing investment mechanisms such as found in Title 50,Chapters 20 and 29 is a prudent exercise of local legislative authority. Statistics are derived from the latest United States Census Bureau Report. Steps in Consideration of an Urban Renewal District: The first step in consideration of establishing an urban renewal district in Idaho is to define a potential area for analysis as to whether conditions exist within it to qualify for redevelopment activities under the statute. We have called this the "Study Area." The next step in the process is to review the conditions within the Study Area to determine whether the area is eligible for creating a district. The State Law governing urban renewal sets out the following criteria, at least one of which must be found, for an area to be considered eligible for urban renewal activities: 51Page Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 314 of 366 1. The Presence of a Substantial Number of Deteriorated or Deteriorating Structures and Deterioration of Site 150-2018(9) and 50-2903(8)(b)] 2. Age or Obsolescence L50-2oi8(8) and 50-2903(8)(a)] 3. Predominance of Defective or Inadequate Street Layout 150-2018(9) and 50-2903(8)(b)] 4. Faulty Lot Layout in Relation to Size, Adequacy, Accessibility, or Usefulness 150-2oi8(9) and 50-2903(8)(b)] 5. Insanitary or Unsafe Conditions 150-2018(9) and 50-2903(8)(b)] 6. Diversity of Ownership 150-2018(9) and 50-2903(8)(b)] 7. Tax or Special Assessment Delinquency 150-2018(9) and 50- 2903(8)(b)] 8. Defective or Unusual Conditions of Title 150-2018(9) and 50- 2903(8)(b)] 9. Results in Economic Underdevelopment of the Area L50-2903(8)(b)] 10. Substantially Impairs or Arrests the Sound Growth of a Municipality 150-2018(9) and 50-2903(8)(b)] If the Eligibility Report finds that one or more of the conditions noted above exists within the Study Area, then the Agency may accept the findings and forward the Eligibility Report to the City Council for their consideration. If the City Council concurs with the determination of the Agency, they may direct that an Urban Renewal Plan be developed for the area that addresses the issues raised in the Eligibility Report. The Agency then acts to prepare the Urban Renewal Plan for the new District and determines whether to also recommend the establishment of a Revenue Allocation Area to fund improvements called for in the Plan. Once the Plan for the District and Revenue Allocation Area are completed, the Agency Board forwards it to the City Council for their consideration. The City Council must refer the Urban Renewal Plan to the Planning and Zoning Commission to determine whether the Plan, as presented, is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and make a corresponding finding. At the same time, other taxing entities levying property taxes within the boundaries of the proposed Urban Renewal District are provided a thirty-day opportunity to comment on the Plan to the City Council. While the taxing entities are invited to comment on the 6 1 P a g e Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 315 of 366 Plan,their concurrence is not required for the City Council to proceed with formal consideration. Once the Planning and Zoning Commission makes their finding of conformity and the thirty-day comment period has passed, the City Council is permitted to hold a public hearing and formally consider the adoption of the Plan creating the new Urban Renewal District and Revenue Allocation Area. The City Council must also find that the taxable value of the district to be created plus the Base Assessed Value of any existing Urban Renewal/ Revenue Allocation Area does not exceed the statutory maximum of io% of the citywide assessed valuation. If the City Council, in their discretion chooses to proceed,they will officially adopt the Urban Renewal Plan and Revenue Allocation Area and provide official notification of that action to the County Assessor and Idaho State Tax Commission. The Agency then proceeds to implement the Plan. Description of the Union District Study Area: The Study Area subject to the current review (Union District) is located primarily in the central part of the City, on the edge of the traditional downtown area and consists of 15 parcels located on 7.512 acres. Eleven(11) of those parcels are under the ownership of public entities and thus are statutorily exempt from property taxes. Four (4) of those parcels represent condominium units located within the Second and Broadway Condominium project and are occupied by the Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho(COMPASS)and Valley Regional Transit. One of the parcels is the common-area land on which the condominium units are constructed and the 0.54 acre parcel to the east serves as surface parking in support of the condominium project and other adjacent uses. Older commercial buildings on the northerly portion of the Study Area have been converted to public use as adjunct library space and as an interim community center. A small municipal park is located at the extreme northeast corner of the Study Area. Currently, the Study Area is located within the Downtown District; however, the Agency is taking steps to amend the Downtown District Plan to de-annex the Study Area parcels. The southerly portion of the Study Area is occupied by older structures located on large parcels and used for the storage and sale of building materials. The extreme southern boundary of the Study Area is occupied by the Right-of-Way of the Union Pacific Railroad. The Study Area encompasses fifteen (15) individual tax parcels. Only the area in the southern portion of the Study Area is taxable. The railroad right-of-way is regarded as "Utility Operating Property" under State Law and as such is assessed separately by the Idaho State Tax Commission. 71 Page Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 316 of 366 Table 1 reflects the data for each of the 15 tax parcels represented in the Study Area: Table 1 Tax Parcel Owner Acres Land Value Improvem Total Value %Impr. ent Value Value/ Land Value Publicly Owned Parcels R5672000856 City of Meridian 0.33 $0 $0 $o N/A R5672000870 Meridian Free Library 0.05 $0 $0 $o N/A District R7596000080 City of Meridian o.16 $0 $o $o N/A R7596000075 City of Meridian 0.08 $0 $0 $o N/A R7596000065 City of Meridian o.16 $0 $o $o N/A R7596000092 Meridian Development 0.54 $0 $o $o N/A Corporation R7794650100 Second&Broadway N/A $0 $o $o N/A Condominium Owners Association R7794650200 Second&Broadway N/A $0 $o $o N/A Condominium Owners Association R7794650300 Second&Broadway N/A $0 $0 $o N/A Condominium Owners Association R7794650400 Second&Broadway N/A $0 $o $o N/A Condominium Owners Association R7794650500 Second&Broadway N/A $0 $o $o N/A Condominium Owners Association Subtotal Publicly Owned 1.32 $0 $0 $0 N/A Privately Owned Parcels S1107325600 Oregon Short Line R R 4.4 $1,322,800 $168,800 $1,491,600 13% Co S1107325700 Oregon Short Line R R o.96 $43o,600 $105,100 $535,700 24% Co R7596000545 Oregon Short Line R R 0.832 $680,400 $444,800 $1,125,200 65% Co R7596000545-A Oregon Short Line R R R-O-W $o $o $o Co Subtotal Privately Owned 6.192 $1,816,9oo $346,48o $2,163,38o Grand Total 1 7.512 $i,816,goo $346,480 $2,163,380 The Study Area is +/- 15.86 acres, of which +/- 7.512 acres include privately and publicly owned parcels. The differential includes public and railroad rights-of- way. Please see the map below for a graphic representation of the Union District Study Area. 8 1 P a g e Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 317 of 366 VNIOIV DISTRICT CITY OF MbUDIAN,ADA COUNTY,IDAHO E PINE AVE Y � a rTF m IT y o v o z z ti 16 � z vi P387P'E ass-a E I DAMO AvE kS ...................... .:. _ _` ::'4Yoi 5 E 3W GS' y E BROADWAY AVE _= ..:...:...................... ........................:......:........... . z F" f• N88°3tYl4"rY fl1!RV15,74 - � t I r � FRAffKLiN Fvoj3MjV �aF -- rea�z+u=w e3 �a IN VS I'RWEC7: 01+� `'l'2030 a WASf-UNGTON AVE UNION DISTRICT EMMETT,ID83617 12QO1B-ex ANNEXATION EXHIBIT aluTrwax p 2� M-6104 nb=ro MERIdIAH,10. y F., 2Q9�398-81Q5 12DOIS SEC. 7, UN . ID HOB. zaa-1�4.15"1 /1 s�e�r AOA COUNTY, IDAHU „�y, LAG WWWSAWrOOTH5 COM ,OF 1 2r�ozD Analysis of the Study Area: The Study Area consists of 15 tax parcels representing 7.512 acres (not including rights-of-way)located in the central part of the City. It is located generally east of Main Street and south of Idaho Avenue. It is a mixture of commercially and industrially zoned properties. The portion of the Study Area fronting the western edge of NE 3,d Street, south of Broadway Avenue currently is designated as City of Meridian I-L Light Industrial. The remaining properties located both north and south of Broadway Avenue are designated as City of Meridian O-T Old Town. The City of Meridian Code under Title ii details the purpose of the O-T zoning designation as follows: 9 1 P a g e Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 318 of 366 "Old Town District(O-T): The purpose of the O-T District is to accommodate and encourage further intensification of the historical City center in accord with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. The intent of the O-T District is to delineate a centralized activity center and to encourage its renewal, revitalization and growth as the public, quasi-public, cultural, financial and recreational center of the City. Public and quasi-public uses integrated with general business, and medium high to high density residential is encouraged to provide the appropriate mix and intensity of activities necessary to establish a truly urban City center." None of the parcels included within the Study Area have been used for agricultural or forestry purposes during the past three years, negating the requirement to gain specific consent of any property owner of such a property for inclusion in an urban renewal district. While public entities have made significant investment in the portions of the northern part of the Study Area with park and parking improvements and a building to house regionally focused governmental organizations,a detailed review of the Study Area reflects a pattern of underinvestment and disinvestment over time. The American Institute of Appraisers suggests that an economically viable, developed property would reflect a ratio of 30% land to 70% improvements. After initial improvements are made, without continuing reinvestment, the improvement ratio declines; and as it approaches par, a condition of disinvestment or deterioration is assumed. Table 1 above shows that all the privately held properties located within the Study Area reflect this condition. The property located at 632 North Main Street reflects improvement value at only 13% of land assessed value and for the property located at 415 East Broadway, the improvement value is only 65% of land value. The structures are old and occupy only a small portion of the applicable sites. A recent site survey has indicated that the light industrial uses formerly conducted on these parcels have terminated and the properties now stand vacant, except for the unused buildings and surface parking. This condition stands in stark contrast to the vision expressed for the area in various City planning documents. Streets: The north half of Broadway Avenue as well as Idaho Avenue, end Street and the westerly portion of 3rd street north of Broadway have been improved to current City of Meridian standards with curbs, gutters, street lighting and storm drainage facilities. A portion of the south side of Broadway remains unimproved as does the east side of 3rd Street through the Study Area. The west side of 3rd Street south of Broadway has curb and gutters in place with an adjacent narrow sidewalk which is interrupted by several unused curb cuts. The sidewalk appears unmaintained and is of insufficient width to accommodate the high-density activity envisioned in City planning documents. Water: As identified in the recent ALTA Survey conducted by Sawtooth Land Surveyors and dated 12/2019, water lines exist in Main Street, 3rd Street and Broadway Avenue as well as on the south side of the Railroad property. However, the latter water line does not extend the full length of the property and therefore is io I Page Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 319 of 366 not looped into the Main Street line. The water main in 3rd Street will likely have to be increased from a 6" to a 12" main. This represents a serious deficiency with respect to fire flows required for the proposed project. Sewer Collection: Although a proposed project has not been reviewed by the City Public Works Department, existing sewer lines may be adequate to serve future development. Pedestrian facilities: Significant investment has been made in the pedestrian facilities in the northerly block of the Study Area. However, the system is incomplete. No facilities exist of the east side of 3rd Street, nor the south side of Broadway Avenue. The introduction of the large number of residents anticipated will require the completion of the pedestrian network. Storm Drainage: Although a proposed project has not been reviewed by the City Public Works Department, existing storm drainage may be adequate to serve future development. Rail Crossing: The extreme southerly portion of the Study Area consists of the right-of-way for the Union Pacific Railway. The tracks located within the right-of- way accommodate active freight rail service and are used on a daily basis. These tracks serve as the primary transit corridor for freight movements from Boise and Meridian to the Union Pacific Mainline connection located in Nampa. The 3rd Street crossing of the rail line is protected only by stop signs. Given the high- density development envisioned in the area and the resultant increase in vehicular and pedestrian traffic,the limited crossing protection currently afforded will prove inadequate. Irrigation Facilities: The Hunter Lateral is a historic irrigation facility that enters the study area from the east crossing 3rd Street near the intersection with Broadway Avenue and fronts the easterly parcels in the Study Area facing Broadway on the south side of the street. The lateral had existed within the Ada County Highway District Right-of-way but recent actions by the developer of the proposed project adjacent to the area have resulted in the acquisition of that portion of the right-of- way in which the lateral exists. The Nampa — Meridian Irrigation District, who owns and maintains the lateral, has retained an easement across the property to allow its continued operation and maintenance. The existence of the easement will limit the use of that area for development. The lateral currently exists in an open ditch configuration along the Broadway frontage and along most of the east side of the 3rd Street frontage. As the lateral turns north across Broadway it enters an underground configuration and continues in this piped arrangement throughout downtown. The open ditch configuration can be considered adequate for the current light industrial uses but as the area transitions to more intense uses the lateral will need to be enclosed consistent with its treatment throughout the rest of downtown Meridian. ii Page Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 320 of 366 Required Findings Regarding Eligibility for the Study Area: In order to make a finding that the Study Area is, in fact, eligible for being considered for the establishment of an urban renewal district, one must compare the conditions found in the area with the statutory criteria noted above. For the convenience of the reader those criteria are repeated here: 1. The Presence of a Substantial Number of Deteriorated or Deteriorating Structures and Deterioration of Site 150-2018(9); and 50-2903(8)(b)] 2. Age or Obsolescence 150-2018(8) and 50-2903(8)(a)] 3. Predominance of Defective or Inadequate Street Layout 150-2018(9) and 50-2903(8)(b)] 4. Faulty Lot Layout in Relation to Size, Adequacy, Accessibility or Usefulness 150-2018(9) and 50-2903(8)(b)] 5. Insanitary or Unsafe Conditions 150-2018(9) and 50-2903(8)(b)] 6. Diversity of Ownership 150-2018(9); 50-2903(8)(b)] 7. Tax or Special Assessment Delinquency 150-2018(9) and 50- 2903(8)(b)] 8. Defective or Unusual Conditions of Title 150-2018(9) and 50- 2903(8)(b)] 9. Results in Economic Underdevelopment of the Area[50-2903(8)(b)] 10. Substantially Impairs or Arrests the Sound Growth of a Municipality 150-2018(9) and 50-2903(8)(b)] Criterion #1: The Presence of a Substantial Number of Deteriorated or Deteriorating Structures; and Deterioration of Site: As noted above all the privately owned properties in the Study Area reflect improvement values less than land values. This suggests that deteriorated or deteriorating structures exist or properties are vacant. A site visit confirms the data — there are a substantial number of old, dilapidated vacant structures in the Study Area with the corresponding properties containing crumbling cement pads and other decaying improvements. Therefore, Criterion *1 is met. Criterion #2:Age or Obsolescence: Substantial investment has been made in the northerly block of the Study Area, but the existing structure owned by the city is old and does not meet the current needs of the community which has experienced the aforementioned expansive growth. The majority of the Study Area south of Broadway is either vacant or lightly used industrial property.The buildings that do 12 1 Page Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 321 of 366 exist on the properties south of Broadway are old, in poor outdated condition and not currently utilized. Given the designation in the City's Comprehensive Plan and zoning documents,the current use as an essentially abandoned light industrial use is obsolete. Therefore Criterion #2 is met. Criterion #3: Predominance of Defective or Inadequate Street Layout. Adequate right-of way exists to accommodate the new investment consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. However, only part of the streets have been improved to full urban standards as required under City of Meridian development regulations. Full improvement to 3ra Street between Broadway Avenue and the Union Pacific right-of-way will be required to accommodate the high-density development. The pedestrian system will need to be completed and full crossing protection will be needed. Therefore, Criterion #3 is met. Criterion #4: Faulty Lot Layout in Relation to Size,Adequacy,Accessibility or Usefulness. The lots located in the northern block of the Study Area are regularly configured and consistent with the rest of the parcels in downtown Meridian. All of the parcels in the northern block are owned by public entities and dedicated to public activities. The four (4) privately owned parcels within the south block of the Study Area are large, and mostly vacant. One parcel is impacted by a 4o-foot-wide easement benefitting the Nampa — Meridian Irrigation District that is located on the southwest quadrant of the 3ra and Broadway intersection. This easement severely limits the flexibility of development options in this location. Currently the eastern-most parcels in the development vision are designated as part of the parcels east of 3ra Street by the Ada County Assessor. Additionally,part of the development vision is located on a part of the Union Pacific Railroad right- of-way. These property anomalies will need to be rectified before the vision expressed for the properties can be realized. Therefore, Criterion #4 is met. Criterion #5: Insanitary or Unsafe Conditions. The substandard condition of major portions of the streets, the lack of adequate storm drainage facilities, the incomplete street lighting system and the lack of adequate pedestrian facilities, inadequate fire flows point to current unsafe conditions that will be exacerbated as development occurs consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, Criterion #5 is met. Criterion #6: Diversity of Ownership. The 15 parcels examined in this study are under the ownership or control of 4 entities; three public and one private. Preliminary discussions with respect to the development proposal currently under consideration suggests mutual support among the various property owners. Therefore, Criterion #6 is not met. 13 1 Page Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 322 of 366 Criterion #7: Tax or Special Assessment Delinquency: The records of the Ada County Assessor do not reflect any tax or special assessment delinquency. Therefore, Criterion #7 is not met. Criterion #8: Defective or Unusual Conditions of Title: The property, currently owned by the Oregon Short Line Railroad,includes certain reversionary clauses in the deeds leading to potential conflicting claims of ownership. The known entities or individuals who are heirs of the last living deeded owners of the fee interest in the property,the Smith and Ellis families,have agreed to convey all of their interest after significant efforts ("Known Underlying Fee Owners"). These Known Underling Fee Owners or KFOs were determined by extensive genealogical and other research. However, because of the unique and complex nature of the chain of title, doubt and uncertainty still exists as to even the state of title even of the KFOs, thereby necessitating a quiet title/declaratory judgment action. Further there is an operating lease and easement that Oregon Short Line Railroad has encumbering the entire property. These conditions are specifically what has prevented the redevelopment of the property for more than 12 years of active attempts to acquire. This condition provides sufficient information to make a determination for most of the property in the Study Area and therefore Criterion 8 has been met. Criterion #9: Results in Economic Underdevelopment of the Area: The northerly block of the Study Area has seen investment in recent years in support of various public uses. However, the majority of the land within the Study Area remains underutilized and, in some cases, we see deteriorating and/or obsolete uses. Therefore, Criterion #9 is met. Criterion #io: Substantially Impairs or Arrests the Sound Growth of a Municipality. The Study Area exists within the corporate limits of the City of Meridian and abuts dense urban development on the north, and west sides. Despite considerable interest in redeveloping this underutilized area on the edge of the historic downtown area, no progress has been made during the ten-year effort to transform the area consistent with the vision expressed in the City's planning documents. The ownership and title issues and lack of adequate infrastructure within most of the Study Area inhibits the development envisioned in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, Criterion #10 is met. Findings: Union District Study Area: Conditions exist within the Study Area to allow the Board of Commissioners of the Agency and the City Council to determine that the area is eligible for urban renewal activities as prescribed in State Law. 141Page Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 323 of 366 Criteria Met Not Met 1 The Presence of a Substantial Number of Deteriorated X or Deteriorating Structures; and Deterioration of Site 2 Age or Obsolescence X 3 Predominance of Defective or Inadequate Street X Layout 4 Faulty Lot Layout in Relation to Size,Adequacy, X Accessibility or Usefulness 5 Insanitary or Unsafe Conditions X 6 Diversity of Ownership X 7 Tax or Special Assessment Delinquency X 8 Defective or unusual condition of title X 9 Results in Economic Underdevelopment of the Area X 10 Substantially Impairs or Arrests the Sound Growth of X a Municipality Analysis: Open Land Conditions: The parcels located within the Study Area have been located within the City limits of Meridian for decades and have been dedicated to various urban uses. Therefore, the provisions of Idaho Code Section 50-2903(8)(c) and 50-2oo8(d) do not apply. Conclusion: Based upon our review of the data and the conditions that exist within the Study Area as noted above, one or more of the necessary criteria have been met and therefore the Meridian City Council may determine that the Union District Urban Renewal District, as proposed, is eligible for the establishment of an urban renewal district. Other Relevant Issues: Agricultural Landowners Concurrence: None of the area within the Study Area maintains an agricultural land property tax exemption as authorized under state law. The statutory provisions concerning the creation of an urban renewal district prohibit inclusion of any land used for agricultural purposes without the express written consent of the property owner. Given that no such exemptions exist nor have existed during the previous three years, consent is not required. lo% Analysis: In addition to the findings reported above, we also sought to verify that the assessed value of the proposed Study Area is within the statutory limits. As noted above, State Law limits the percentage of assessed value that can be included in urban renewal / revenue allocation districts to io% of the total valuation of the City. According to Ada County Assessor records, the most recent certified value for the City is $9,465,76o,oii. The taxable value of the Study Area is $2,162,38o representing 0.023% of the total City assessed value. The Base 15 1 Page Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 324 of 366 Assessed Value of the Downtown District is $131,252,90o and the Ten Mile Road District is $12,582,900. The Table below shows the result compared to the statutory requirement. Statutory io% Limitation Analysis Area Base Assessed Percentage Value Total City $9,465,76o,oii 100 • Downtown District URD $131,252,900 1.39% • Ten Mile Road URD $12,582,900 0.133% • Proposed Union District URD $2,163,380 0.023% Total UR Base Assessed Value Percentage $145,998,i8o 1.54% We also explored the effect of creating this district on the capacity of the Urban Renewal Agency to consider future districts should they choose to do so.The table below shows that even if a new district similar to Union District were to be established, approximately 8.46% of the citywide assessed value would remain uncommitted. Remaining Urban Renewal Capacity • Maximum io% Limitation $946,5�76,001 10% • Downtown District URD $131,252,900 1.38�7% • Ten Mile Road URD $12,582,900 0.133% • Proposed Union District URD $2,162,380 0.023% • Total AV in Revenue Allocation Areas $145,998,180 1.54% • Available AV under limitation $8OO,576,001 8.46% 4838-5478-2132,v.3 i6IPage Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 325 of 366 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 20-003 BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, A/K/A THE MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, ALSO KNOWN AS THE MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ACCEPTING THAT CERTAIN REPORT ON ELIGIBILITY FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY REFERRED TO AS THE UNION DISTRICT AREA AS AN URBAN RENEWAL AREA AND REVENUE ALLOCATION AREA AND JUSTIFICATION FOR DESIGNATING THE AREA AS APPROPRIATE FOR AN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CHAIRMAN, VICE-CHAIRMAN OR ADMINISTRATOR TO TRANSMIT THE REPORT AND THIS RESOLUTION TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN REQUESTING ITS CONSIDERATION FOR DESIGNATION OF AN URBAN RENEWAL AREA AND SEEKING FURTHER DIRECTION FROM THE COUNCIL; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THIS RESOLUTION, made on the date hereinafter set forth by the Urban Renewal Agency of Meridian, Idaho, also known as the Meridian Development Corporation, an independent public body, corporate and politic, authorized under the authority of the Idaho Urban Renewal Law of 1965, Chapter 20, Title 50, Idaho Code, as amended (the "Law"), a duly created and functioning urban renewal agency for Meridian, Idaho, hereinafter referred to as the "MDC." WHEREAS, on July 24, 2001, the City Council (the "City Council") of the City of Meridian, Idaho (the "City"), adopted Resolution No. 01-367 establishing MDC; WHEREAS, on October 8, 2002, the City Council, after notice duly published, conducted a public hearing on the Meridian Revitalization Plan Urban Renewal Project, which is also referred to as the Downtown District (the "Downtown District Plan"); WHEREAS, following said public hearing, the City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 02-987 on December 3, 2002, approving the Downtown District Plan and making certain findings; RESOLUTION NO. 20-003 - 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 326 of 366 WHEREAS, on June 14, 2016, the City Council, after notice duly published, conducted a public hearing on The Ten Mile Road Urban Renewal Plan (the "Ten Mile Plan"). The public hearing was continued to June 21, 2016, for further testimony; WHEREAS, following said public hearing, the City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 16-1695 on June 21, 2016, approving the Ten Mile Plan and making certain findings; WHEREAS, based on inquiries and information presented by certain interested parties and property owners, MDC commenced certain discussions concerning examination of an area as appropriate for an urban renewal project; WHEREAS, in 2019, Kushlan I Associates and SMR Development, LLC commenced an eligibility study and preparation of an eligibility report for an area about 16 acres in size and currently located within the boundaries of the Downtown District Plan, which area may be subject to de-annexation. The area is generally east of Main Street, south of Idaho Avenue, west of E. 3rd Street, and north of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way. The eligibility study area is commonly referred to as the Union District area; WHEREAS, MDC has obtained an eligibility report (the "Report"), which examined the Union District Area for the purpose of determining whether such area was a deteriorating area and/or a deteriorated area as defined by Idaho Code Sections 50- 2018(9) and 50-2903(8); WHEREAS, the Report, dated February 2020, has been submitted to MDC, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A; WHEREAS, pursuant to Idaho Code Section 50-2008, an urban renewal project may not be planned or initiated unless the local governing body has, by resolution, determined such area to be a deteriorated area or deteriorating area, or combination thereof, and designated such area as appropriate for an urban renewal project; WHEREAS, Idaho Code Section 50-2906, also requires that in order to adopt an urban renewal plan containing a revenue allocation financing provision, the local governing body must make a finding or determination that the area included in such plan is a deteriorated area or deteriorating area; WHEREAS, the MDC Board finds it in the best public interest to accept the Report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above statements are true and correct. RESOLUTION NO. 20-003 - 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 327 of 366 Section 2. That the Board acknowledges acceptance and receipt of the Report. Section 3. That there are one or more areas within the City that are a deteriorating area or a deteriorated area as defined by Idaho Code Sections 50-2018(9) and 50-2903(8). Section 4. That one such area is an area approximately 16 acres in size and currently located within the boundaries of the Downtown District Plan, which area may be subject to de-annexation, and more commonly known as the Union District area. The area is generally east of Main Street, south of Idaho Avenue, west of E. 3rd Street, and north of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way. Section 5. That the rehabilitation, conservation, and redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such area is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City. Section 6. That the Chairman or Vice-Chairman of the Board of Commissioners, or the Administrator are hereby authorized to transmit the Report to the Meridian City Council requesting that the City Council: a. Determine whether the Union District area identified in the Report qualifies as an urban renewal project and there is justification for designating the area, as appropriate, for an urban renewal project; b. If such designation is made, whether MDC should proceed with the preparation of an urban renewal plan for the area, which plan may include a revenue allocation provision as allowed by law; C. If such designation is made whether MDC should proceed with the preparation of a plan amendment to the Downtown District Plan to deannex the Union District Area. Section 7. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. RESOLUTION NO. 20-003 - 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 328 of 366 i PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Meridian, Idaho, also known as the Meridian Development Corporation, on February 26, 2020. Signed by the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners and attested by the Secretary to the Board of Commissioners, on February 26, 2020. i i APPROVED: i By Chair of the Board ATTEST: Secreta RESOLUTION NO. 20-003 - 4 FREQUENTLYASKED QUESTIONS URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICTS What is an Urban Renewal District (URD)? An Urban Renewal District is a Tax Increment Finance (TIF) tool that helps fund infrastructure to support redevelopment (downtown), bare undeveloped land that is infrastructure challenged (business/industrial parks) and brownfield development (industrial site). Tax Increment Financing: when a URD is put into place, property tax revenues begin to be separated into two groups – the base and the increment. Once the District sunsets, all of the increased annual incremental revenues flow back to the taxing entities. How would creating a URD affect the properties within the area? 1. Help with Blight and Infrastructure Challenges – A City with an area that struggles to redevelop because of blight, deteriorating buildings, or a lack of infrastructure can utilize Urban Renewal to invest in specific districts. It is one of the only tools available to cities to help fund infrastructure improvements. 2. Funded by Property Tax Increment – Establishing an URD doesn’t raise property taxes. Over time if redevelopment happens, the property values increase. As they increase, the new tax revenue (that wouldn’t have been there if not for urban renewal) is re-invested in the URD. 3. District Plan – Cities follow a District Plan and can only work on projects outlined within that plan. Once the URD sunsets, all of the increased annual incremental revenues flow back to the taxing entities. How is the boundary of the URD determined? The boundary of a URD is determined by examining areas of the city that are prime for redevelopment (downtown) or development (future business and/or industrial areas). These areas will be evaluated to determine eligibility. Eligibility criteria, per Idaho Code, includes deteriorating buildings or sites, defective street layouts, faulty lot layout, insanitary or unsafe conditions, diversity of ownership, tax delinquency, defective and unusual conditions of title, or endangerment of life or property. An additional eligibility requirement is that the combined district(s) property value must be below 10 percent of all properties within the City. Does a URD take money away from other local government services? A URD/TIF does not raise taxes or affect impact fees. Where economic disinvestment is evident and revitalization is essential the taxing districts of local government (schools, emergency services, etc.) receive all revenue to which they are entitled under state law and applicable budget and levy limits (base). Is the URD going to increase taxes? No, property taxes are not increased when a URD is formed. Assuming the redevelopment activities result in growth that would not have occurred otherwise, the URD’s activities help raise property values within Meridian’s renewal district(s) at a faster rate than Meridian as a whole. This translates into a more valuable property for the owner and in turn, more tax revenue in the district. The tax levy rate may rise insignificantly for all property owners in a county to accommodate the TIF mechanism of the districts within the county, but the amount is returned as a benefit at the end of the districts’ life. See Tax Increment Financing Graph 1 and Graph 2. What projects and/or improvements are anticipated? Urban renewal districts are formed in areas that are often in need of additional public infrastructure for support of schools, police, housing, roads, utilities, etc. Anticipated improvements may include but are not limited to streets, sidewalks, public utilities, water, sewer, irrigation, lighting, etc. �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item -4.C. Presenter: Cameron Arial Estimated Time for Presentation: 10 minutes Title of Item - Resolution No. 20-2188: A Resolution Of The Mayor And The City Council Of The City Of Meridian Accepting That Certain Report On Eligibility For The Union District Area As An Urban Renewal Area And Revenue Allocation Area And Justification For Designating The Area As Appropriate For An Urban Renewal Project; Determining That The Area Identified In The Report Is Deteriorated Or Deteriorating; Designating Such Area As Appropriate For An Urban Renewal Project; Directing The Urban Renewal Agency To Prepare An Urban Renewal Plan For The Area To Include A Revenue Allocation Provision As Allowed By Law; Directing The Urban Renewal Agency To Prepare A Plan Amendment To The Downtown District Plan To Deannex The Union District Area; And Providing An Effective Date ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Accepting Union District URA Eligibility Report Resolution 3/2/2020 VW Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 330 of 366 CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 20-2188 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, HOAGLUN, PERREAULT, STRADER A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ACCEPTING THAT CERTAIN REPORT ON ELIGIBILITY FOR THE UNION DISTRICT AREA AS AN URBAN RENEWAL AREA AND REVENUE ALLOCATION AREA AND JUSTIFICATION FOR DESIGNATING THE AREA AS APPROPRIATE FOR AN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT; DETERMINING THAT THE AREA IDENTIFIED IN THE REPORT IS DETERIORATED OR DETERIORATING; DESIGNATING SUCH AREA AS APPROPRIATE FOR AN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT; DIRECTING THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY TO PREPARE AN URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR THE AREA TO INCLUDE A REVENUE ALLOCATION PROVISION AS ALLOWED BY LAW; DIRECTING THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY TO PREPARE A PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT PLAN TO DEANNEX THE UNION DISTRICT AREA; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council (the "City Council") of the City of Meridian, Idaho (the "City"), found that deteriorating areas exist in the City, therefore, for the purposes of the Idaho Urban Renewal Law of 1965, Chapter 20, Title 50, Idaho Code, as amended (the "Law"), created an urban renewal agency pursuant to the Law, authorizing the agency to transact business and exercise the powers granted by the Law and the Local Economic Development Act, Chapter 29, Title 50, Idaho Code, as amended (the "Act") upon making the findings of necessity required for creating the Urban Renewal Agency of the city of Meridian, Idaho, also known as the Meridian Development Corporation(the "Agency"); WHEREAS, the Mayor has duly appointed the Board of Commissioners of the Agency (the "Agency Board"), which appointment was confirmed by the City Council; WHEREAS, on October 8, 2002, the City Council after notice duly published, conducted a public hearing on the Meridian Revitalization Plan Urban Renewal Project, which is also referred to as the Downtown District (the "Downtown District Plan"); WHEREAS, following said public hearing, on December 2, 2002, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 02-987 approving the Downtown District Plan; WHEREAS, on June 14, 2016, the City Council, after notice duly published, conducted a public hearing on The Ten Mile Road Urban Renewal Plan (the "Ten Mile Plan"). The public hearing was continued to June 21, 2016, for further testimony; RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ELIGIBILITY FOR THE UNION DISTRICT AREA As AN URBAN RENEWAL AREA—PAGE 1 OF 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 331 of 366 WHEREAS, following said public hearing, on June 21, 2016 the City Council adopted Ordinance 16-1695 approving the Ten Mile Plan; WHEREAS, the Downtown District Plan and the Ten Mile Plan and their project areas are collectively referred to herein as the "Existing Project Areas;" WHEREAS,based on inquiries and information presented by certain interested parties and property owners, the Agency commenced certain discussions concerning examination of an underdeveloped area of approximately 16 acres in size and currently within the Downtown District Plan Project Area boundaries as appropriate for an urban renewal project. The area is generally east of Main Street, south of Idaho Avenue, west of E. 3rd Street, and north of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way. The area is commonly referred to as the Union District Area; WHEREAS,the City and Agency commenced certain further discussions concerning examination of the Union District Area as appropriate for an urban renewal project; WHEREAS, during 2019, Kushlan and Associates and SMR Development LLC commenced an eligibility study and prepared an eligibility report for the Union District Area, which area may be subject to de-annexation from the Downtown District Plan Project Area; WHEREAS,the Agency obtained Union District Urban Renewal District Eligibility Report, dated February 2020 (the "Report"), which examined the Union District Area for the purpose of determining whether such area was a deteriorating area and/or deteriorated area as defined by Idaho Code Sections 50-2018(9) and 50-2903(8); WHEREAS,the Report, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, found the existence of one or more of the statutory criteria for the area to be considered eligible for urban renewal activities; WHEREAS, the effects of the listed conditions cited in the Report result in economic underdevelopment of the area, substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a municipality, constitutes an economic or social liability, and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition or use; WHEREAS, the Agency, on February 26, 2020, adopted Resolution No. 20-003 (a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference, without attachments thereto) accepting the Report and authorizing the Chairman, Vice-Chairman or Administrator of the Agency to transmit the Report to the City Council requesting its consideration for designation of an urban renewal area and requesting the City Council to direct the Agency to prepare an urban renewal plan for the Union District Area, which plan may include a revenue allocation provision as allowed by law; RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ELIGIBILITY FOR THE UNION DISTRICT AREA As AN URBAN RENEWAL AREA—PAGE 2 OF 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 332 of 366 WHEREAS, the Report includes a preliminary analysis concluding the base assessment roll value for the Union District Area along with the base assessment rolls for the Existing Project Areas do not exceed 10% of the overall current(2019)taxable property value of the City; WHEREAS,pursuant to Idaho Code Section 50-2008, an urban renewal project may not be planned or initiated unless the local governing body has, by resolution, determined such area to be a deteriorated area or deteriorating area, or combination thereof, and designated such area as appropriate for an urban renewal project; WHEREAS, Idaho Code Section 50-2906, also requires that in order to adopt an urban renewal plan containing a revenue allocation financing provision, the local governing body must make a finding or determination that the area included in such plan is a deteriorated area or deteriorating area; and WHEREAS, it is desirable and in the best public interest that the Agency prepare an urban renewal plan for the area identified as the Union District Area in the Report located in the city of Meridian, county of Ada, state of Idaho. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO,AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City Council acknowledges acceptance and receipt of the Report. Section 2. The City Council finds and declares that the Union District Area identified in the Report, which area may be subject to de-annexation, is a deteriorated or deteriorating area, as defined in Title 50, Chapter 20 and 29, Idaho Code, as amended, and qualifies as an urban renewal project and justification exists for designating the area as appropriate for an urban renewal project. Section 3. Having made such designation, the City Council hereby directs the Agency to commence preparation of a plan amendment to the Downtown District Plan to deannex the Union District Area from the Downtown District Plan Project Area for consideration by the Agency Board and, if acceptable, final consideration by the City Council in compliance with Title 50, Chapters 20 and 29, Idaho Code, as amended. Section 4. Having made such designation, the City Council hereby directs the Agency to commence preparation of an urban renewal plan for the Union District Area for consideration by the Agency Board and, if acceptable, final consideration by the City Council in compliance with Title 50, Chapters 20 and 29, Idaho Code, as amended. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ELIGIBILITY FOR THE UNION DISTRICT AREA As AN URBAN RENEWAL AREA—PAGE 3 OF 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 333 of 366 Section 5. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this loth day of March, 2020. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this loth day of March, 2020 APPROVED: Mayor Robert E. Simison ATTEST: By: Chris Johnson, City Clerk RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ELIGIBILITY FOR THE UNION DISTRICT AREA AS AN URBAN RENEWAL AREA-PAGE 4 OF 4 EXHIBIT A ELIGIBILITY REPORT Union District Urban Renewal District Eligibility Report Prepared for Galena Opportunity Inc. Meridian Development Corporation City of Meridian February 2020 Kushlan I Associates SMR Development, LLC Boise, Idaho I I P a g e EXHIBIT A-ELIGIBILITY REPORT—UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 335 of 366 Introduction: Kushlan I Associates and SMR Development, LLC were retained by the Galena Opportunity Inc. to assist them in their discussions with the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Meridian, Idaho, also known as Meridian Development Corporation(the"Agency' or"MDC") and the City of Meridian (the "City") with regard to establishing a new urban renewal district in the City. The Mayor,with the confirmation of the City Council,has appointed nine members to the Agency Board to guide the development of urban renewal plans and oversee their implementation.The current membership of the Agency Board is as follows: Chair: David Winder Vice Chair Nathan Mueller Secretary Steve Vlassek Commissioners Dan Basalone Treg Bernt Diane Bevan Tammy de Weerd Kit Fitzgerald Rob McCarvel Urban Renewal Administrator: Ashley Squyres Idaho Code §50-20o6 states: "URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY. (a)There is hereby created in each municipality an independent public body corporate and politic to be known as the"urban renewal agency"that was created by resolution as provided in section 50-2005,Idaho Code,before July 1,2011,for the municipality.."to carry out the powers enumerated in the statutes. The Meridian City Council adopted Resolution 01-367 on July 24,20o1 bringing forth those powers within the City of Meridian. The MDC currently oversees the implementation of two urban renewal districts. The Meridian Revitalization Plan is the original district, which focuses on the revitalization of the downtown (the"Downtown District"). It was established by the City Council's adoption of Ordinance No. 02-987 on December 3, 2002. The Downtown District is set to expire in 2026. The Urban Renewal Plan forthe Ten Mile Road-A Urban Renewal Project(the"Ten Mile District")was created by the Meridian City Council on June 21,2016 through the adoption of Ordinance No. 16-1695. It is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2o36. 2 1 P a g e EXHIBIT A-ELIGIBILITY REPORT—UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 336 of 366 ---- ------ 9 1­9 ------------- --------- ------- ------------ L ------- ------------- [h-.b-I- Background: The development of the community of Meridian started in the i88os and was originally located on a farm owned by the Onweiler family.A school was opened in 1885.The U.S.Postal Service established a mail drop along the Oregon Short Line Railroad and the site was named Hunter after its superintendent. Community activity grew around this mail stop focused on the railroad.In 1893 an Odd Fellows lodge was organized and called itself Meridian,acknowledging that it was located on the Boise Meridian the primary North-South survey benchmark for Idaho,and 1893 is generally regarded as the year of the City's founding. That name grew in primary use as the name of the settlement and the Village of Meridian was incorporated in 19o3 with a population of approximately 200. Meridian's traditional economy focused on the support of the surrounding agricultural activities. A maj or creamery was established in the community in 1897 to support the nearby dairies. Fruit orchards were located throughout the area. Wage EXHIBIT A-ELIGIBILITY REPORT—UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 337 of 366 Meridian was a significant stop on the Interurban electric railway from 19o8 to 1928. This service provided convenient access for passengers and freight in both easterly and westerly directions. Throughout most of the 20th century, Meridian remained a relatively quiet community focused on its agricultural roots.US Census Bureau data reflects a 1910 population of 61g people growing to 2,616 by 196o. However,starting in 1970 the pace of growth in Southwest Idaho quickened. Meridian's growth initially reflected, and then exceeded the regional growth rates by significant margins. Over the past twenty-five years the rate of growth has been startling by any reasonable standard. The following table reflects that population growth over the City's history. 1903(Incorporation Estimate) 200 1910 619 1920 1,013 1930 1,004 1940 1,465 1950 2,081 196o 2,616 1970 6,658 1990 9,596 2000 34,919 2010 75,092 2019 (Estimate) 1o61804 Cities across the nation actively participate in the economic vitality of their communities through investment in infrastructure. Water and sewer facilities as well as transportation and other systems are all integral elements of an economically viable community. With the significant growth rate and corresponding extension of infrastructure Meridian has a significant amount of capital maintenance and capital improvements looming on the near horizon. Title 50, Chapters 20 and 29, the Urban Renewal Law of 1965 and the Local Economic Development Act contain some of the few tools that are available to cities to help fund public improvements. New sources of State support are not likely to become available in the foreseeable future,thus the Agency's interest in exploring the potential for establishing their third urban renewal district is appropriate. Coupling that State support with the private sector investment potential created by the Opportunity Zone program created under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Tax Reform and further implemented by the IRS under Internal Revenue Code §1400Z-1 and §1400Z-2 could catalyze significant future revitalization. 41Page EXHIBIT A-ELIGIBILITY REPORT—UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 338 of 366 Demographics: According to the US Census Bureau,the estimated 2019 population of the City is io6,804 which is a 38.8%increase since 2010.This growth rate is more than three times of that experienced statewide which was 11.9%during that period. Meridian has been acknowledged as one of the fastest growing cities in the United States. At 28.5%, the City's percentage of people under 18 years of age exceeds the statewide percentage of 25.5% by 3.0%. The percentage of population under 5 years of age exceeds the statewide figure by 0.3% (6.9%vs. 6.6%).The percentage of the City's population over 65 years of age (12.1%) is less than the statewide percentage (15.9%) by 3.8%. These statistics reflect a population base that is considerably younger than that found statewide. Housing units are 76.2% owner-occupied as opposed to the statewide statistic of 69.2%.Median value of owner-occupied housing units is$221,300 as compared to $176,80o statewide. Monthly owner costs with mortgage is$1,381 as compared to the statewide figure of$1,195.Median gross rent in the City of Meridian is reported as$1,016 as compared to$792 statewide. When income statistics are compared to statewide numbers, we see that the population of the City exceeds the rest of Idaho in these categories as well. The median household income in the City is $64,375, approximately 26% above the statewide figure of$50,985.Per capita monthly income for the City's population is $29,857 as compared to the statewide number of$25,471. The percentage of the City's population below poverty level is 9.8%as compared to the statewide number of 11.8%. These statistics suggest that the City's population is in an enviable position as compared to many Idaho communities. However,the capital and service delivery demands presented by the startling level of growth,when considered in the context of the fiscal limitations on Idaho local government suggest that utilizing existing investment mechanisms such as found in Title 50,Chapters 20 and 29 is a prudent exercise of local legislative authority. Statistics are derived from the latest United States Census Bureau Report. Steps in Consideration of an Urban Renewal District: The first step in consideration of establishing an urban renewal district in Idaho is to define a potential area for analysis as to whether conditions exist within it to qualify for redevelopment activities under the statute. We have called this the "Study Area." The next step in the process is to review the conditions within the Study Area to determine whether the area is eligible for creating a district. The State Law governing urban renewal sets out the following criteria,at least one of which must be found,for an area to be considered eligible for urban renewal activities: 5 1 P a g e EXHIBIT A-ELIGIBILITY REPORT—UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 339 of 366 1. The Presence of a Substantial Number of Deteriorated or Deteriorating Structures and Deterioration of Site 150-2018(9) and 50-2903(8)(b)] 2. Age or Obsolescence 150-2018(8)and 50-2903(8)(a)] 3. Predominance of Defective or Inadequate Street Layout 150-2018(9) and 50-2903(8)(b)] 4. Faulty Lot Layout in Relation to Size, Adequacy, Accessibility, or Usefulness 150-2018(9)and 50-2903(8)(b)] 5. Insanitary or Unsafe Conditions 150-2018(9)and 50-2903(8)(b)] 6. Diversity of Ownership 150-2018(9)and 50-2903(8)(b)] 7. Tax or Special Assessment Delinquency 150-2018(9) and 50- 2903(8)(b)] 8. Defective or Unusual Conditions of Title 150-2o18(9) and 50- 2903(8)(b)] 9. Results in Economic Underdevelopment of the Area[50-2903(8)(b)] 10. Substantially Impairs or Arrests the Sound Growth of a Municipality 150-2018(9)and 50-2903(8)(b)] If the Eligibility Report finds that one or more of the conditions noted above exists within the Study Area,then the Agency may accept the findings and forward the Eligibility Report to the City Council for their consideration. If the City Council concurs with the determination of the Agency, they may direct that an Urban Renewal Plan be developed for the area that addresses the issues raised in the Eligibility Report. The Agency then acts to prepare the Urban Renewal Plan for the new District and determines whether to also recommend the establishment of a Revenue Allocation Area to fund improvements called for in the Plan. Once the Plan for the District and Revenue Allocation Area are completed,the Agency Board forwards it to the City Council for their consideration. The City Council must refer the Urban Renewal Plan to the Planning and Zoning Commission to determine whether the Plan, as presented, is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and make a corresponding finding.At the same time, other taxing entities levying property taxes within the boundaries of the proposed Urban Renewal District are provided a thirty-day opportunity to comment on the Plan to the City Council. While the taxing entities are invited to comment on the 6 1 P a g e EXHIBIT A-ELIGIBILITY REPORT—UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 340 of 366 Plan,their concurrence is not required for the City Council to proceed with formal consideration. Once the Planning and Zoning Commission makes their finding of conformity and the thirty-day comment period has passed,the City Council is permitted to hold a public hearing and formally consider the adoption of the Plan creating the new Urban Renewal District and Revenue Allocation Area. The City Council must also find that the taxable value of the district to be created plus the Base Assessed Value of any existing Urban Renewal/Revenue Allocation Area does not exceed the statutory maximum of lo% of the citywide assessed valuation. If the City Council,in their discretion chooses to proceed,they will officially adopt the Urban Renewal Plan and Revenue Allocation Area and provide official notification of that action to the County Assessor and Idaho State Tax Commission. The Agency then proceeds to implement the Plan. Description of the Union District Study Area: The Study Area subject to the current review(Union District) is located primarily in the central part of the City, on the edge of the traditional downtown area and consists of 15 parcels located on 1.512 acres. Eleven(11)of those parcels are under the ownership of public entities and thus are statutorily exempt from property taxes. Four(4) of those parcels represent condominium units located within the Second and Broadway Condominium project and are occupied by the Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho(COMPASS)and Valley Regional Transit. One of the parcels is the common-area land on which the condominium units are constructed and the 0.54 acre parcel to the east serves as surface parking in support of the condominium project and other adjacent uses. Older commercial buildings on the northerly portion of the Study Area have been converted to public use as adjunct library space and as an interim community center. A small municipal park is located at the extreme northeast corner of the Study Area. Currently,the Study Area is located within the Downtown District; however, the Agency is taking steps to amend the Downtown District Plan to de-annex the Study Area parcels. The southerly portion of the Study Area is occupied by older structures located on large parcels and used for the storage and sale of building materials. The extreme southern boundary of the Study Area is occupied by the Right-of-Way of the Union Pacific Railroad. The Study Area encompasses fifteen (15) individual tax parcels. Only the area in the southern portion of the Study Area is taxable. The railroad right-of-way is regarded as"Utility Operating Property"under State Law and as such is assessed separately by the Idaho State Tax Commission. 7 1 P a g e EXHIBIT A-ELIGIBILITY REPORT—UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 341 of 366 Table 1 reflects the data for each of the 15 tax parcels represented in the Study Area: Table 1 Tax Parcel Owner Acres Land Value Improvem Total Value %Impr. ent value Value/ Land Value Publicly Owned Parcels R5672000856 City of Meridian 0.33 $o $0 $0 N/A R5672000870 Meridian Free Library 0.05 $o $0 $0 N/A District R7596000080 City of Meridian o.16 $o $o $0 N/A R7596000075 City of Meridian 0.08 $o $0 $0 N/A R7596000065 City of Meridian o.16 $o $0 $0 N/A R7596000092 Meridian Development 0.54 $o $o $0 N/A Corporation R7794650100 Second&Broadway N/A $o $o $o N/A Condominium Owners Association R7794650200 Second&Broadway N/A $o $o $0 N/A Condominium Owners Association R7794650300 Second&Broadway N/A $o $0 $0 N/A Condominium Owners Association R7794650400 Second&Broadway N/A $o $0 $0 N/A Condominium Owners Association R7794650500 Second&Broadway N/A $o $o $0 N/A Condominium Owners Association Subtotal Publicly Owned $o $0 $0 Privately Owned Parcels S1107325600 Oregon Short Line R R 44 $1,322,800 $168,800 $1,491,600 13% Co S1107325700 Oregon Short Line R R o.96 $43o,600 $105,100 $535,700 24% Co R7596000545 Oregon Short Line R R o.832 $680,400 $444,800 $1,125,200 65% Co R7596000545-A Oregon Short Line R R R-O-W $o $o $0 Co Subtotal Privately Owned 6.192 $i,8i6,goo $346,480 $2,163,380 Grand TotalAnow- 12 $1 816 oo $346,48o $2,i63,38o The Study Area is+/-15.86 acres,of which+/-7.512 acres include privately and publicly owned parcels. The differential includes public and railroad rights-of- way. Please see the map below for a graphic representation of the Union District Study Area. 8 1 P a g e EXHIBIT A-ELIGIBILITY REPORT—UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 342 of 366 uruoN DISTRICT CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADA CDf7MY,IpAhV U � uu � E FfNE AVE z i z v y z s 4 z ❑ o 2 y y N A b]- E IDAHO AVE � F F— r 3�.05 L _ E 9ROADWAYAVE - - :!S.a5.1CRC5 h S1S1S1f MC%..PACfkaGRAli t/ D L / alp � 1,�74 E FRANKLIH RD OF .t " I k89^3}M3'W 17 !d BP V' FggAGy nis 2030a WA5HM16-NY AVE. p1GM UNION D STRICT DWF r,➢ &WJ7 12cu1 aea ANNEXATION EXHIBIT MI.TRUAx p)/(200V)3q"0I04 MEND—fo_ F:(2081398-SJ05 12001E SEC, 7,T3N. RIE,R.M. 2C"l s.641 v�r ADA COUNTY, IDAHtl - VJJlYJ5.4W70Ui'FtV^.[aM saoso �� rvLLG Analysis of the Study Area: The Study Area consists of 15 tax parcels representing 7.512 acres(not including rights-of-way)located in the central part of the City. It is located generally east of Main Street and south of Idaho Avenue. It is a mixture of commercially and industrially zoned properties. The portion of the Study Area fronting the western edge of NE 3rd Street, south of Broadway Avenue currently is designated as City of Meridian I-L Light Industrial. The remaining properties located both north and south of Broadway Avenue are designated as City of Meridian O-T Old Town. The City of Meridian Code under Title ii details the purpose of the O-T zoning designation as follows: g1Page EXHIBIT A-ELIGIBILITY REPORT—UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 343 of 366 "Old Town District(O-T): The purpose of the O-T District is to accommodate and encourage further intensification of the historical City center in accord with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. The intent of the 0-T District is to delineate a centralized activity center and to encourage its renewal,revitalization and growth as the public,quasi-public,cultural,financial and recreational center of the City.Public and quasi-public uses integrated with general business, and medium high to high density residential is encouraged to provide the appropriate mix and intensity of activities necessary to establish a truly urban City center." None of the parcels included within the Study Area have been used for agricultural or forestry purposes during the past three years,negating the requirement to gain specific consent of any property owner of such a property for inclusion in an urban renewal district. While public entities have made significant investment in the portions of the northern part of the Study Area with park and parking improvements and a building to house regionally focused governmental organizations,a detailed review of the Study Area reflects a pattern of underinvestment and disinvestment over time. The American Institute of Appraisers suggests that an economically viable, developed property would reflect a ratio of 30%land to 70%improvements.After initial improvements are made, without continuing reinvestment, the improvement ratio declines;and as it approaches par,a condition of disinvestment or deterioration is assumed. Table 1 above shows that all the privately held properties located within the Study Area reflect this condition.The property located at 632 North Main Street reflects improvement value at only 13%of land assessed value and for the property located at 415 East Broadway, the improvement value is only 65% of land value. The structures are old and occupy only a small portion of the applicable sites. A recent site survey has indicated that the light industrial uses formerly conducted on these parcels have terminated and the properties now stand vacant, except for the unused buildings and surface parking. This condition stands in stark contrast to the vision expressed for the area in various City planning documents. Streets: The north half of Broadway Avenue as well as Idaho Avenue, end Street and the westerly portion 0f 3rd street north of Broadway have been improved to current City of Meridian standards with curbs,gutters,street lighting and storm drainage facilities.A portion of the south side of Broadway remains unimproved as does the east side of 3rd Street through the Study Area. The west side of 3rd Street south of Broadway has curb and gutters in place with an adjacent narrow sidewalk which is interrupted by several unused curb cuts. The sidewalk appears unmaintained and is of insufficient width to accommodate the high-density activity envisioned in City planning documents. Water: As identified in the recent ALTA Survey conducted by Sawtooth Land Surveyors and dated 12/2019, water lines exist in Main Street, 3rd Street and Broadway Avenue as well as on the south side of the Railroad property. However, the latter water line does not extend the full length of the property and therefore is ioIPage EXHIBIT A-ELIGIBILITY REPORT—UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 344 of 366 not looped into the Main Street line. The water main in 3rd Street will likely have to be increased from a 6"to a 12"main. This represents a serious deficiency with respect to fire flows required for the proposed project. Sewer Collection: Although a proposed project has not been reviewed by the City Public Works Department, existing sewer lines may be adequate to serve future development. Pedestrian facilities: Significant investment has been made in the pedestrian facilities in the northerly block of the Study Area. However, the system is incomplete. No facilities exist of the east side Of 3rd Street, nor the south side of Broadway Avenue. The introduction of the large number of residents anticipated will require the completion of the pedestrian network. Storm Drainage: Although a proposed project has not been reviewed by the City Public Works Department, existing storm drainage may be adequate to serve future development. Rail Crossing: The extreme southerly portion of the Study Area consists of the right-of-way for the Union Pacific Railway. The tracks located within the right-of- way accommodate active freight rail service and are used on a daily basis. These tracks serve as the primary transit corridor for freight movements from Boise and Meridian to the Union Pacific Mainline connection located in Nampa. The 3ra Street crossing of the rail line is protected only by stop signs. Given the high- density development envisioned in the area and the resultant increase in vehicular and pedestrian traffic,the limited crossing protection currently affordedwill prove inadequate. Irrigation Facilities: The Hunter Lateral is a historic irrigation facility that enters the study area from the east crossing 3rd Street near the intersection with Broadway Avenue and fronts the easterly parcels in the Study Area facing Broadway on the south side of the street. The lateral had existed within the Ada County Highway District Right-of-way but recent actions by the developer of the proposed project adjacent to the area have resulted in the acquisition of that portion of the right-of- way in which the lateral exists. The Nampa — Meridian Irrigation District, who owns and maintains the lateral, has retained an easement across the property to allow its continued operation and maintenance. The existence of the easement will limit the use of that area for development. The lateral currently exists in an open ditch configuration along the Broadway frontage and along most of the east side of the 3ra Street frontage. As the lateral turns north across Broadway it enters an underground configuration and continues in this piped arrangement throughout downtown. The open ditch configuration can be considered adequate for the current light industrial uses but as the area transitions to more intense uses the lateral will need to be enclosed consistent with its treatment throughout the rest of downtown Meridian. ii I Page EXHIBIT A-ELIGIBILITY REPORT—UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 345 of 366 Required Findings Regarding Eligibility for the Study Area: In order to make a finding that the Study Area is, in fact, eligible for being considered for the establishment of an urban renewal district,one must compare the conditions found in the area with the statutory criteria noted above. For the convenience of the reader those criteria are repeated here: 1. The Presence of a Substantial Number of Deteriorated or Deteriorating Structures and Deterioration of Site 150-2018(9);and 50-2903(8)(b)] 2. Age or Obsolescence 150-2018(8)and 50-2903(8)(a)] 3. Predominance of Defective or Inadequate Street Layout 150-2oi8(9) and 50-2903(8)(b)] 4. Faulty Lot Layout in Relation to Size, Adequacy, Accessibility or Usefulness 150-2018(9)and 50-2903(8)(b)] 5. Insanitary or Unsafe Conditions 150-2oi8(9)and 50-2903(8)(b)] 6. Diversity of Ownership 150-2018(9);50-2903(8)(b)] 7. Tax or Special Assessment Delinquency 150-2018(9) and 50- 2903(8)(b)] 8. Defective or Unusual Conditions of Title 150-2oi8(9) and 50- 2903(8)(b)] 9. Results in Economic Underdevelopment of the Area[50-2903(8)(b)] 10. Substantially Impairs or Arrests the Sound Growth of a Municipality 150-2018(g)and 50-2903(8)(b)] Criterion #1: The Presence of a Substantial Number of Deteriorated or Deteriorating Structures; and Deterioration of Site: As noted above all the privately owned properties in the Study Area reflect improvement values less than land values. This suggests that deteriorated or deteriorating structures exist or properties are vacant. A site visit confirms the data — there are a substantial number of old, dilapidated vacant structures in the Study Area with the corresponding properties containing crumbling cement pads and other decaying improvements.Therefore,Criterion#1 is met. Criterion#2:Age or Obsolescence:Substantial investment has been made in the northerly block of the Study Area,but the existing structure owned by the city is old and does not meet the current needs of the community which has experienced the aforementioned expansive growth. The majority of the Study Area south of Broadway is either vacant or lightly used industrial property.The buildings that do 12 1 Page EXHIBIT A-ELIGIBILITY REPORT—UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 346 of 366 exist on the properties south of Broadway are old,in poor outdated condition and not currently utilized.Given the designation in the City's Comprehensive Plan and zoning documents,the current use as an essentially abandoned light industrial use is obsolete.Therefore Criterion#2 is met. Criterion #3: Predominance of Defective or Inadequate Street Layout. Adequate right-of way exists to accommodate the new investment consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. However, only part of the streets have been improved to full urban standards as required under City of Meridian development regulations. Full improvement to 3rd Street between Broadway Avenue and the Union Pacific right-of-way will be required to accommodate the high-density development. The pedestrian system will need to be completed and full crossing protection will be needed. Therefore,Criterion#3 is met. Criterion#4:Faulty Lot Layout in Relation to Size,Adequacy,Accessibility or Usefulness.The lots located in the northern block of the Study Area are regularly configured and consistent with the rest of the parcels in downtown Meridian. All of the parcels in the northern block are owned by public entities and dedicated to public activities. The four(4) privately owned parcels within the south block of the Study Area are large, and mostly vacant. One parcel is impacted by a 4o-foot-wide easement benefitting the Nampa — Meridian Irrigation District that is located on the southwest quadrant of the 3ra and Broadway intersection. This easement severely limits the flexibility of development options in this location. Currently the eastern-most parcels in the development vision are designated as part of the parcels east of 3ra Street by the Ada County Assessor. Additionally,part of the development vision is located on a part of the Union Pacific Railroad right- of-way. These property anomalies will need to be rectified before the vision expressed for the properties can be realized. Therefore,Criterion#4 is met. Criterion #5: Insanitary or Unsafe Conditions. The substandard condition of major portions of the streets, the lack of adequate storm drainage facilities, the incomplete street lighting system and the lack of adequate pedestrian facilities, inadequate fire flows point to current unsafe conditions that will be exacerbated as development occurs consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, Criterion#5 is met. Criterion#6:Diversity of Ownership.The 15 parcels examined in this study are under the ownership or control of 4 entities; three public and one private. Preliminary discussions with respect to the development proposal currently under consideration suggests mutual support among the various property owners. Therefore,Criterion#6 is not met. 131Page EXHIBIT A-ELIGIBILITY REPORT—UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 347 of 366 Criterion #7: Tax or Special Assessment Delinquency: The records of the Ada County Assessor do not reflect any tax or special assessment delinquency. Therefore,Criterion#7 is not met. Criterion#8:Defective or Unusual Conditions of Title:The property,currently owned by the Oregon Short Line Railroad,includes certain reversionary clauses in the deeds leading to potential conflicting claims of ownership. The known entities or individuals who are heirs of the last living deeded owners of the fee interest in the property,the Smith and Ellis families,have agreed to convey all of their interest after significant efforts ("Known Underlying Fee Owners"). These Known Underling Fee Owners or KFOs were determined by extensive genealogical and other research. However,because of the unique and complex nature of the chain of title, doubt and uncertainty still exists as to even the state of title even of the KFOs, thereby necessitating a quiet title/declaratory judgment action. Further there is an operating lease and easement that Oregon Short Line Railroad has encumbering the entire property. These conditions are specifically what has prevented the redevelopment of the property for more than 12 years of active attempts to acquire. This condition provides sufficient information to make a determination for most of the property in the Study Area and therefore Criterion 8 has been met. Criterion #9: Results in Economic Underdevelopment of the Area: The northerly block of the Study Area has seen investment in recent years in support of various public uses. However, the majority of the land within the Study Area remains underutilized and, in some cases, we see deteriorating and/or obsolete uses.Therefore,Criterion#9 is met. Criterion #io: Substantially Impairs or Arrests the Sound Growth of a Municipality. The Study Area exists within the corporate limits of the City of Meridian and abuts dense urban development on the north, and west sides. Despite considerable interest in redeveloping this underutilized area on the edge of the historic downtown area, no progress has been made during the ten-year effort to transform the area consistent with the vision expressed in the City's planning documents. The ownership and title issues and lack of adequate infrastructure within most of the Study Area inhibits the development envisioned in the City's Comprehensive Plan.Therefore,Criterion#io is met. Findings: Union District Study Area: Conditions exist within the Study Area to allow the Board of Commissioners of the Agency and the City Council to determine that the area is eligible for urban renewal activities as prescribed in State Law. 141Page EXHIBIT A-ELIGIBILITY REPORT—UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 348 of 366 Criteria Met Not Met 1 The Presence of a Substantial Number of Deteriorated X or Deteriorating Structures;and Deterioration of Site 2 Age or Obsolescence X 3 Predominance of Defective or Inadequate Street X Layout 4 Faulty Lot Layout in Relation to Size,Adequacy, X Accessibility or Usefulness 5 Insanitary or Unsafe Conditions X 6 Diversity of Ownership X 7 Tax or Special Assessment Delinquency X 8 Defective or unusual condition of title X 9 Results in Economic Underdevelopment of the Area X 10 Substantially Impairs or Arrests the Sound Growth of X a Municipality Analysis: Open Land Conditions: The parcels located within the Study Area have been located within the City limits of Meridian for decades and have been dedicated to various urban uses. Therefore,the provisions of Idaho Code Section 50-2903(8)(c)and 50-20o8(d)do not apply. Conclusion: Based upon our review of the data and the conditions that exist within the Study Area as noted above, one or more of the necessary criteria have been met and therefore the Meridian City Council may determine that the Union District Urban Renewal District, as proposed, is eligible for the establishment of an urban renewal district. Other Relevant Issues: Agricultural Landowners Concurrence: None of the area within the Study Area maintains an agricultural land property tax exemption as authorized under state law. The statutory provisions concerning the creation of an urban renewal district prohibit inclusion of any land used for agricultural purposes without the express written consent of the property owner. Given that no such exemptions exist nor have existed during the previous three years,consent is not required. 10% Analysis: In addition to the findings reported above, we also sought to verify that the assessed value of the proposed Study Area is within the statutory limits.As noted above, State Law limits the percentage of assessed value that can be included in urban renewal / revenue allocation districts to io% of the total valuation of the City.According to Ada County Assessor records,the most recent certified value for the City is $9,465,76o,oii.The taxable value of the Study Area is $2,162,38o representing 0.023% of the total City assessed value. The Base 15 1 Page EXHIBIT A-ELIGIBILITY REPORT—UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 349 of 366 Assessed Value of the Downtown District is $131,252,90o and the Ten Mile Road District is $12,582,900. The Table below shows the result compared to the statutory requirement. tatut0ry io%Limitation Analysis Area Base Assessed Percentage Value Total City $ 465 760 oil 100% • Downtown District URD $131,252,900 1.39% • Ten Mile Road URD $12,582,900 0.133% • Proposed Union District URD $2,163,380 0.023% Total UR Base Assessed Value Percentage $145 8 180 1.54% We also explored the effect of creating this district on the capacity of the Urban Renewal Agency to consider future districts should they choose to do so.The table below shows that even if a new district similar to Union District were to be established, approximately 8.46% of the citywide assessed value would remain uncommitted. Remaining Urban Renewal Capacity • Maximum lo%Limitation $946,576,001 10% • Downtown District URD $131,252,900 1.387% • Ten Mile Road URD $12,582,900 0.133% • Proposed Union District URD $2,162,380 0.023% • Total AV in Revenue Allocation Areas $145,998,18o 1.54% • Available AV under limitation $800,576,00i 8.46% 4838-5478-2132,v.3 161Page EXHIBIT A-ELIGIBILITY REPORT—UNION DISTRICT URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 350 of 366 EXHIBIT B MDC AGENCY RESOLUTION I MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION j THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO.20-003 BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO,A/K/A THE MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: i A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO,ALSO KNOWN AS THE MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,ACCEPTING THAT CERTAIN REPORT ON ELIGIBILITY FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY REFERRED TO AS THE UNION DISTRICT j AREA AS AN URBAN RENEWAL AREA AND REVENUE ALLOCATION AREA AND JUSTIFICATION FOR DESIGNATING THE AREA AS APPROPRIATE FOR AN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT;AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CHAIRMAN,VICE-CHAIRMAN OR ADMINISTRATOR TO TRANSMIT THE REPORT AND THIS RESOLUTION TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN REQUESTING ITS CONSIDERATION FOR DESIGNATION OF AN URBAN RENEWAL AREA AND j SEEKING FURTHER DIRECTION FROM THE COUNCIL; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THIS RESOLUTION, made on the date hereinafter set forth by the Urban Renewal Agency of Meridian, Idaho,also known as the Meridian Development Corporation,an independent public body, corporate and politic,authorized under the authority of the Idaho Urban Renewal Law of 1965,Chapter 20,Title 50, Idaho Code,as amended (the"Law"), a duly created and functioning urban renewal agency for Meridian, Idaho, hereinafter referred to as the"MDC." WHEREAS,on July 24, 2001,the City Council (the"City Council")of the City of Meridian, Idaho(the"City"), adopted Resolution No.01-367 establishing MDC; WHEREAS,on October 8,2002,the City Council, after notice duly published, conducted a public hearing on the Meridian Revitalization Plan Urban Renewal Project, which is also referred to as the Downtown District(the"Downtown District Plan"); WHEREAS,following said public hearing, the City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 02-987 on December 3, 2002, approving the Downtown District Plan and making certain findings; RESOLUTION NO.20-003- 1 EXHIBIT B—MDC RESOLUTION 20-003 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 351 of 366 WHEREAS, on June 14, 2016,the City Council, after notice duly published, j conducted a public hearing on The Ten Mile Road Urban Renewal Plan (the"Ten Mile Plan"). The public hearing was continued to June 21, 2016, for further testimony; WHEREAS,following said public hearing,the City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 16-1695 on June 21, 2016, approving the Ten Mile Plan and making certain findings; WHEREAS, based on inquiries and information presented by certain interested parties and property owners, MDC commenced certain discussions concerning examination of an area as appropriate for an urban renewal project; WHEREAS, in 2019, Kushlan I Associates and SMR Development, LLC commenced an eligibility study and preparation of an eligibility report for an area about 16 acres in size and currently located within the boundaries of the Downtown District Plan,which area may be subject to de-annexation. The area is generally east of Main Street, south of Idaho Avenue, west of E. 3rd Street, and north of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way. The eligibility study area is commonly referred to as the Union District area; WHEREAS, MDC has obtained an eligibility report(the"Report"),which examined the Union District Area for the purpose of determining whether such area was a deteriorating area and/or a deteriorated area as defined by Idaho Code Sections 50- 2018(9)and 50-2903(8); WHEREAS, the Report, dated February 2020, has been submitted to MDC, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A; WHEREAS, pursuant to Idaho Code Section 50-2008, an urban renewal project may not be planned or initiated unless the local governing body has, by resolution, determined such area to be a deteriorated area or deteriorating area, or combination thereof, and designated such area as appropriate for an urban renewal project; WHEREAS, Idaho Code Section 50-2906,also requires that in order to adopt an urban renewal plan containing a revenue allocation financing provision,the local governing body must make a finding or determination that the area included in such plan is a deteriorated area or deteriorating area; WHEREAS,the MDC Board finds it in the best public interest to accept the Report. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above statements are true and correct. RESOLUTION NO.20-003-2 EXHIBIT B—MDC RESOLUTION 20-003 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 352 of 366 Section 2. That the Board acknowledges acceptance and receipt of the Report. Section 3. That there are one or more areas within the City that are a deteriorating area or a deteriorated area as defined by Idaho Code Sections 50-2018(9) and 50-2903(8). Section 4. That one such area is an area approximately 16 acres in size and currently located within the boundaries of the Downtown District Plan,which area may be subject to de-annexation, and more commonly known as the Union District area. The area is generally east of Main Street, south of Idaho Avenue,west of E. 3rd Street, and north of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way. Section 5. That the rehabilitation, conservation, and redevelopment, or a combination thereof,of such area is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City. Section 6. That the Chairman or Vice-Chairman of the Board of Commissioners,or the Administrator are hereby authorized to transmit the Report to the Meridian City Council requesting that the City Council: a. Determine whether the Union District area identified in the Report qualifies as an urban renewal project and there is justification for designating the area, as appropriate,for an urban renewal project; b. If such designation is made,whether MDC should proceed with the preparation of an urban renewal plan for the area, which plan may include a revenue allocation provision as allowed by law; C. If such designation is made whether MDC should proceed with the preparation of a plan amendment to the Downtown District Plan to deannex the Union District Area. Section 7. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. RESOLUTION NO.20-003-3 EXHIBIT B—MDC RESOLUTION 20-003 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 353 of 366 I PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Meridian, I Idaho, also known as the Meridian Development Corporation, on February 26, 2020. Signed by the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners and attested by the Secretary to the Board of Commissioners, on February 26, 2020. APPROVED: By C air of the Board ATTEST: Secreta ! i I I i i I i i i i RESOLUTION NO.20-003-4 EXHIBIT B—MDC RESOLUTION 20-003 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 354 of 366 CAE I�iAIv ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item -4.D. Presenter: Caleb Hood Estimated Time for Presentation: 30 Title of Item - Community Development: 2020 Roadway, Intersection and Community Program Priorities Review list of priority projects as prepared by the Transportation Commission and finalize list to be sent to ACHD by 3/20/2020. ATTACHMENTS: Memo -2020 ACHD Priorities Cover Memo 3/5/2020 Meridian Priority Projects Exhibit 3/5/2020 Meridian Priority Projects PDF Version Cover Memo 3/10/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 355 of 366 March 11, 2020 Mary May Commission President Ada County Highway District 3775 Adams Street Garden City, ID 83714 RE: 2021-2025 Integrated Five-Year Work Plan Dear Commissioner May: The City of Meridian appreciates the opportunity to submit the attached lists of transportation projects for consideration in the ACHD 2021-2025 Integrated Five-Year Work Plan (IFYWP). The City is thankful for ACHD staff attendance at both the Meridian Transportation Commission and City Council meetings, for the questions they have answered, and for generally assisting the City as we navigate through your programming process. While we understand that congestion, safety and ultimately cost-benefit dominate your process, the City’s priorities also reflect areas of our community where we are currently experiencing and anticipate directing growth. For 2020, our priority lists represent technical merits, the reality of where roadway and intersection projects are needed today, and where we anticipate the need in the near future – corridors in priority service areas. Before getting into projects and priority requests for 2020, we would like to thank ACHD for partnering to improve key roadways in our community. We are pleased with the outcomes and the partnerships to complete past projects and look forward to working with you on future ones as well. The improvements made to Linder Road north of Ustick Road and the work being done right now on Ten Mile Road and Chinden Boulevard will drastically improve the livability in north Meridian. By collaborating with ITD and the development community, these projects are happening sooner than planned – thank you! The Meridian Road, Cherry to Ustick project is also exciting and we look forward to that project’s completion, as well as the Linder, Franklin to Pine project later this year. Speaking of Linder Road, as you know it is a regionally significant north-south corridor we would like to see the District continue to improve. The next key project we would like to partner with you (and ITD) on is an I-84 Overpass at Linder Road. Once constructed, Linder Road will connect the north and south sides of our community, create relief on the already congested Ten Mile and Meridian Road corridors, and setup nearby in-fill lands for development. Not only will this project connect Meridian residents and businesses but Linder will become a continuous 33 miles long, stretching from the Snake River in Kuna to the foothills in Eagle. It will allow direct access from across the Boise River, making destinations like Swan Falls and Eagle Island State Park more accessible to recreationalists; this corridor connects and assists motorists, pedestrians, and cyclists in multiple communities. Our partnership on the Locust Grove Road Overpass was several years ago was very successful and we see similar benefits and outcomes from building an overpass at Linder Road. We appreciate ACHD’s willingness to discuss this project with us in the past and look forward to working with you and the State to move this project forward into design. In conclusion, the City strongly believes the attached prioritized lists are not a wish list of niceties but rather an identification of Meridian’s most-needed transportation system projects. Our priorities represent our attempt to hold true to previous IFYWP submissions, but also identify corridors in areas where investments made by the District, the City and private forces guide where development occurs. Please communicate with Caleb Hood, 208-884-5533, with any questions or issue that may arise regarding the City’s lists of priority projects. Thank you for your time and consideration of our priority requests. Sincerely, Treg Bernt City Council President Attachments: City of Meridian 2020 Roadways, Intersections and Community Programs Priorities cc: ACHD Commissioners Meridian City Council Ryan Head, ACHD Planning & Programming Supervisor Mayor Tammy de Weerd E IDIANCity Council Members: Joe Barton Genesis Miiam Ty Palmer Luke Cavener Treg Bernt Anne Little Roberts March 5, 2020 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council CC: City Clerk FROM: Caleb Hood, Planning Division Manager C RE: 2020 Roadway, Intersection and Community Programs Project Priorities Annually, the City prepares transportation priority lists for ACHD to consider in their programming and budget process. On December 201h, the City received a letter from ACHD notifying us that work was starting on the FY2021-2025 Integrated Five-Year Work Plan (IFYWP). New this year, ACHD prepared an Interactive Prioritization Tool; here is a link: ACHD Interactive Prioritization Tool On February 3rd and March 2nd, the Meridian Transportation Commission (MTC)reviewed and now recommends to Council, the following list of 2020 roadway, intersection and community programs priorities. During the March I01h meeting, Staff will walk Council through ACHD's interactive map, share the MTC's recommendations and some of the discussion had, and ask Council to finalize the priorities. Further, Staff will prepare a draft cover letter and bring that to the meeting. This letter could be sent to ACHD with our list of priority projects. ACHD is requesting all project requests be submitted no later than March 20, 2020. Attachments: 1) MPD - Top Crash Locations Table (2017/18) 2) PM Peak Level of Service (LOS) Map 3) DRAFT 2020 Roadway & Intersection Priority Projects List(From MTC) Community Development Department . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite ioz, Meridian, ID 83642 Phone�R�iI�frti�y3�dGrfc4l �n�§ �ar?Eft�Pl;rdd ia �y3��bf 366 Meridian Police Department—Top Crash Intersections for Years: 2017 & 2018 Count of Case Number Years Top Crash Intersection 2017 2018 Grand Total N EAGLE RD/E USTICK RD 56 68 124 N EAGLE RD/E FAIRVIEW AVE 65 57 122 MERIDIAN RD/OVERLAND RD 45 70 115 E FAIRVIEW AVE/N LOCUST GROVE RD 47 49 96 EAGLE RD/FRANKLIN RD 43 43 86 EAGLE RD/PINE AVE 37 34 71 EAGLE RD/OVERLAND RD 30 40 70 EAGLE RD/E ST LUKES ST 38 22 60 EAGLE RD/E RIVER VALLEY ST 29 25 54 LOCUST GROVE RD/OVERLAND RD 25 22 47 EAGLE RD/LANARK 17 29 46 FRANKLIN RD/MAIN ST 33 13 46 MERIDIAN RD/FAIRVIEW AVE (CHERRY LN) 24 19 43 CHINDEN BLVD/MERIDIAN RD 12 27 39 USTICK RD/LOCUST GROVE RD 23 16 39 LINDER RD/CHINDEN BLVD 9 30 39 FAIRVIEW AVE/RECORDS WAY 22 17 39 Source: NWRMS Note: Data locations filtered by intersection location and some data may be incomplete. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 357 of 366 2 Existing PM Peak Hour LOS Map October 2019 q E Level of Service-Intersections 40 A,BorC S V D 0 E F STATE ST Level of Service-Segments �` A,B,C,w D E IX w G H Z Q CHINDEN BLVD C w MA o Q MCMILLAN RD zd U USTICK RD CHERRY LN FAIRVIEW AVE PINE AVE FRANKLIN RD � o z U J OVERLAND RD' Y U � g � m w J_ w O w w Z AMITY RD w � I J LAKE HAZEL RD Q 9y IF Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 358 of 366 3 City of Meridian 2020 Prioritization Request Form Updates include adoption of the FY2020-20241FYWP. Programming status is subject to change. 020 Current IFYWP Programming Status Priority 2019 YR fonstruction Pri.rity T Ranking , Ranking Agency Project Name Agency Project Description ROW YR ACHD Response- ACHD Implementation Project Name City Comments &Intersections Projects/Corridors Widen Locust Grove Rd to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk and bike lanes in accordance with the Already commented on bike lanes/ 1 1 Locust Grove Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd 2016 CIP. 2019 2020-2021 2022 Project to be built in 2022. Locust Grove Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Ra multi-use pathway.Priority corridor, Widen Linder Rd to 5 lanes and construct a new 4-lane 1-84 overpass, including curb, gutter, Project added to IFYWP for discussion purposes.ACHD sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP.Project would be a joint project between to coordinate with ITD on request. Project to move 2 2 Linder Rd,Overland Rd/Franklin Rd ACHD and ITD Future Future Future forward when funding partnership is possible Linder Rd,Overland Rd/Franklin Ra Council priority project/corridor, Need to discuss the cross-section and Widen Locust Grove Rd to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk, and bike lanes in accordance with Not Not Per City request,ACHD to coordinate with Meridian to if this should be a 3 or 5-lane facility. 3 5 Locust Grove Rd,Fairview Ave/Ustick Rd the 2016 CIP. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed discuss scope. Locust Grove Rd,Fairview Ave/Ustick Ra i Scope changing to widen Fairview to Widen intersection to 9 lanes on Fairview Ave and 7 lanes on Locust Grove Rd, including curb, Eagle concurrently(2019 priority#37; 4 6 Fairview Ave and Locust Grove Rd gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP 2020-2021 2021 2022 Project to be built in 2022. Fairview Ave and Locust Grove Rd 2020#34).Combine? Widen Eagle Rd to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 5 7 Eagle Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd CIP. 2018 2019-2020 2021 Project to be built in 2021. Eagle Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd Widen Ten Mile Rd to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the 6 9 Ten Mile Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd 2016 CIP. 2019 2020 2022-2023 Project to be built in 2022-2023. Ten Mile Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Ra Widen Victory Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion 7 10 Victory Rd,Locust Grove Rd/Eagle Rd CIP. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed into future IFYWP updates. Victory Rd,Locust Grove Rd/Eagle Rd Council priority corridor? Possibly move up.Key corridor to Widen Ustick Rd to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion new Owyhee H5.Council Priority 8 18 Ustick Rd,Ten Mile Rd/Linder Rd CIP. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed into future IFYWP updates. Ustick Rd,Ten Mile Rd/Linder Ra Corridor? Need to review cross-section Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion including number of lanes.Priority 9 14 Linder Rd,Cherry Ln/Ustick Rd Widen Linder Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with 2016 CIP Not Programmed Programmed Programmed into future IFYWP updates. Linder Rd,Cherry Ln/Ustick Rd corridor? Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion 10 19 Locust Grove Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd Widen Locust Grove Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes Not Programmed Programmed Programmed into future IFYWP updates. Locust Grove Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Ra Priority corridor? Widen Victory Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion 11 20 Victory Rd,Meridian Rd/Locust Grove Rd CIP. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed into future IFYWP updates. Victory Rd,SH 69(Meridian Rd)/Locust Grove Ra Priority corridor? Not Not ACHD to prioritized for possible inclusion in future 12 60 Ten Mile Rd/Cherry Ln Intersection improvements to include dual left turn lanes, Not Programmed Programmed Programmed IFYWP updates. Ten Mile Rd and Cherry Ln Project added to IFYWP for discussion purposes.ACHD to coordinate with ITD on request. Project to move 13 61 Eagle Rd/Overland Rd Intersection improvements to include dual left turn lanes, Future Future Future forward when funding partnership is possible. Overland Rd and Eagle Rd Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion 14 11 McMillan Rd,Meridian Rd/Locust Grove Rd Widen McMillan Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes Not Programmed Programmed Programmed into future IFYWP updates. McMillan Rd,SH 69(Meridian Rd)/Locust Grove Rd Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion 15 12 McMillan Rd,Linder Rd/Meridian Rd Widen McMillan Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes Not Programmed Programmed Programmed into future IFYWP updates. McMillan Rd,Linder Rd/SH 69(Meridian Rd) Construct a multi-lane roundabout with 2 lanes on Locust Grove legs and 1 lane on Victory legs in 16 13 Victory Rd and Locust Grove Rd Roundabout accordance with the 2016 CIP. 2019 2020 2021 Project to be built in 2021. Victory Rd and Locust Grove Rd Roundabout Priority corridors? Widen intersection or add roundabout in accordance with the Master Street Map.Traffic analysis 17 r2s�Meridian n Mile Rd and Victory Rd should determine the ultimate lane configuration based on above projects in the area 2019-2020 _ 2020 2022-2023 Project to be built in 2022-2023. Ten Mile Rd and Victory Rd Priority corridor-Victory? Widen Meridian Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the i Not Not 18 Rd,McMillan Rd/Chinden Blvd 2016 CIP. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better, Meridian Rd,McMillan Rd/US20126(Chinden Blvd, Need to review cross-section Widen Locust Grove Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion including number of lanes.See mile 19 15 Locust Grove Rd,Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd the 2016 CIP. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed into future IFYWP updates. Locust Grove Rd,Ustick Rd/McMillan Ra segment south.Priority corridor? Widen Meridian Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion 20 16 Meridian Rd,Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd 2016 CIP. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed into future IFYWP updates. Meridian Rd,Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd Widen and signalize intersection to 4/5 lanes on Eagle and 315 lanes on Lake in accordance with 21 21 Lake Hazel Rd and Eagle Rd the 2016 CIP. 2020 _ 2021 2023 Project to be built in 2023. Lake Hazel Rd and Eagle Ra Widen and signalize intersection to 5 lanes on Linder Rd and 6 lanes on Overland Rd in accordance Not Not See prioirty project#2,Linder Rd 22 22 Overland Rd and Linder Rd with the 2016 CIP. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Overland Rd and Linder Ra Overpass Not Not Ustick a priority corridor?Owyhee 23 23 Ustick Rd and Black Cat Rd Construct a dual lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better, Ustick Rd and Black Cat Ra HS. Key cooridor to Owyhee HS.Priority 24 Ustick,Black Cat to Ten Mile Widen to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes corridor? 25 Victory,Linder to Meridian Widen Priority corridor? Eagle Rd and Amity Rd Roundabout(Dual Widen roundabout to a dual lane roundabout,with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes.Project Not Not 26 30 Lane) to be constructed concurrently with Eagle Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd Not Programmed Programmed Programmed To be built by development. Eagle Rd and Amity Rd Roundabout(Dual Lane, Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion 27 31 Franklin Rd,McDermott Rd/Black Cat Rd Widen Franklin Rd to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes Not Programmed Programmed Programmed into future IFYWP updates. Franklin Rd,McDermott Rd/Black Cat Rc Last mile in Ada Co.not widened. Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion 28 62 1 Eagle Rd/Franklin Rd Not provided Not Programmed Programmed Programmed into future IFYWP updates. Eagle Rd and Franklin Ra 29 32 Ten Mile Rd and Amity Rd Construct a roundabout.Project includes bridge#205AX, 2018 2019-2020 2021 Project to be built in 2021. Ten Mile Rd and Amity Rd Widen intersection to 4 lanes Linder Rd and 5/6 lanes on Cherry Ln in accordance with the 2016 Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion 30 33 Cherry Ln and Linder Rd CIP. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed into future IFYWP updates. Cherry Ln and Linder Rd Widen intersection to 5/6 lanes on Black Cat Rd and 5 lanes on Cherry Ln in accordance with the Not Not 11111111 31 34 Cherry Ln and Black Cat Rd 2016 CIP. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Cherry Ln and Black Cat Ra Widen Fairview Ave to 7 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the Not Not 32 35 Fairview Ave,SH 55(Eagle Rd)/Cloverdale Rd 2016 CIP. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better, Fairview Ave,SH 55(Eagle Rd)/Cloverdale Ro Linder Rd,Chinden Blvd(US 20/26)/SH 44(State Widen Linder Rd in accordance with the 2016 CIP.Cross section to be determined through concept 33 36 St) design.Project includes bridges#1078,#2033,#2034,#2035,and#2036. 2024 Future Future Project to begin design in 2024. Linder Rd,Chinden Blvd(US 20/26)/SH 44(State St, Widen Fairview Ave to 7 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the Not Not Evaluating for possible inclusion with Fairview and See priority#6 from 2019, 34 37 Fairview Ave,Locust Grove Rd/SH 55(Eagle Rd) 2016 CIP. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Locust Grove intersection, Fairview Ave,Locust Grove Rd/SH 55(Eagle Rd) Fairview/LG INT.move up? Widen Fairview Ave to 7 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with the Not Not 35 38 Fairview Ave,Meridian Rd/Locust Grove Rd 2016 CIP. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Fairview Ave,Meridian Rd/Locust Grove Ra Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Not a 2016 CIP 36 39 Cherry Ln,Linder Rd/Meridian Rd Widen Cherry Ln to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Project. Cherry Ln,Linder Rd/Meridian Ra Improve safety and traffic operations along Fairview Ave in accordance with the Fairview Avenue Project to be implemented through development. Fairview Ave Corridor Management,Linder Corridor Management Strategy. Project may include bicycle and pedestrian facilities and other Not Not ACHD and Meridian to coordinate implementation as Fairview Ave Corridor Management,Linder Rd/ 37 40 Rd/Orchard St access management treatments. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed development applications are processed. Orchard St Not Not 38 41 Ten Mile Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd Widen Ten Mile Rd to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer. Operating at a LOS D.Not a 2016 CIP Project, Ten Mile Rd,Amity Rd/Victory Rd Extend roadway and construct streetscape improvements, including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and East 03rd St Extension,Carlton St/Fairview Ave improved UPRR crossing, from Carlton Ave to Fairview Ave in accordance with the Downtown Not Not 39 4&=(Phase 2) Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer until completion of Phase 1(Franklin to Carlton) East 03rd St Carlton St/Fairview Ave(Phase 2) Need connection into downtown from Locust Grove;Pine is the only Broadway Ave/Idaho Ave Extension,East Not Not Broadway Ave/Idaho Ave Extension,06th St/Locust connection currently.Likely largely 40 43 06th St/Locust Grove Rd Not provided Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer. To be considered as properties redevelopment Grove Rd development driven. Not Not 41 44 McMillan Rd and Black Cat Rr{Vleridia a 2016 CIP Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better, McMillan Rd and Black Cat Ra Programming 2019 Priority Priority Ranking Ranking Agency Project Name Agency Project Description I r D' • ® ACHD Response Widen intersection to 3/4 lanes on Amity and 314 lanes on Black Cat in accordance with the 2016 Not Not 42 45 Amity Rd and Black Cat Rd CIP. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Amity Rd and Black Cat Ro Not Not 43 46 McMillan Rd and Star Rd Construct a multi-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better, McMillan Rd and Star Ro Not Not 44 47 Amity Rd and Linder Rd Construct a single-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Amity Rd and Linder Rd Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Not included in 45 48 JCherry Ln and McDermott Rd Widen intersection to 3 lanes on McDermott and 5 lanes on Cherry Not Programmed Programmed Programmed the 2016 CIP. Cherry Ln and McDermott Rd Not Not 46 49 Franklin Rd and McDermott Rd Construct a single-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Franklin Rd and McDermott Ro Widen intersection to 3 lanes on McDermott and 4 lanes on Ustick in accordance with the 20161 Not Not 47 50 Ustick Rd and McDermott Rd CIP. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better, Ustick Rd and McDermott Ra Widen and signalize intersection to 3/4 lanes on McDermott and 3 lanes on in accordance with the Not Not 48 51 McMillan Rd and McDermott Rd Ustick 2016 CIP. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. McMillan Rd and McDermott Ro Not Not 49 52 Ustick Rd and Star Rd Construct a single-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better, Ustick Rd and Star Rd Not Not Does not currently meet warrants. ACHD to reevaluate 50 53 Ten Mile Rd and Chateau Dr Signalize intersection. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed as development occurs in the area. Ten Mile Rd and Chateau Dr Not Not 51 54 Lake Hazel Rd and Locust Grove Rd Construct a single-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better, Lake Hazel Rd and Locust Grove Ra Widen and signalize intersection to 3/4 lanes on Locust Grove and 5/6 lanes on Amity in Not Not 52 55 Amity Rd and Locust Grove Rd accordance with the 2016 CIP. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer.Operating at a LOS D or better. Amity Rd and Locust Grove Rd Not Not 53 56 lVictory Rd and Linder Rd Construct a single-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better, Victory Rd and Linder Ra ioirity corridors;move up? Locust Grove Rd,McMillan Rd/Chinden Widen Locust Grove Rd to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes in accordance with Not Not Locust Grove Rd,McMillan Rd/US 20/26(Chinden 54 57 Blvd(US 20/26) the 2016 CIP. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Blvd) Not Not Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Not included in Key cooridor to Owyhee HS.Priority 55 58 Ustick Rd,McDermott Rd/Black Cat Rd Widen Ustick Rd to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes Not Programmed Programmed Programmed the 2016 CIP. Ustick Rd,McDermott Rd/Black Cat Ra rridor? Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion 56 59 Pine,Linder to Meridian Widen to 3 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalks and/or multi-use or mixed-use bikeway Not Programmed Programmed Programmed into future IFYWP updates. Pine Ave,Linder Rd/Meridian Ro Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion 57 63 Eagle Rd/Fairview Ave Not provided Not Programmed Programmed Programmed into future IFYWP updates. Eagle Rd and Fairview Ave 58 Lake Hazel/Discovery Park Intersection improvements. Parks request. Pedestiran improvemetns are needed as are intersection upgrades at 59 Amity,Eagle to Cloverdale Widen to 5 lanes with curb,gutter,sidewalk,and bike lanes Hillsdale Avenue. 60 Amity,Locust Grove to Eagle Widen 61 Victory,Ten Mile to Linder Widen 62 Black Cat,Cherry to Ustick Widen 63 Black Cat,Franklin to Cherry Widen 64 Black Cat,Ustick to McMillan Widen 65 Black Cat,McMillan to Chinden Widen 66 McMillan,Black Cat to Ten Mile Widen 67 McMillan,Ten Mile to Linder Widen 68 Eagle,Lake Hazel to Amity Widen 69 Locust Grove,Lake Hazel to Amity 3-lane? Community Progra Construct a detached asphalt or concrete pathway on east side of Locust Grove between Puffin 1 2 Locust Grove Rd,Overland Rd/Puffin St Stand Overland Rd. 2019 2020-2021 2022 Project to be built in 2022. Locust Grove Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Ro Reconstruct Stoddard Rd, between Victory Rd and Overland Rd to 3-lanes,7 attached sidewalks and bike lanes. Project includes bridge#2085 and an enhanced pedestrian crossing(pedestrian NEED to keep on list as it is a VRF Stoddard Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Rd(Stoddard hybrid beacon)at Victory and Stoddard(CM214-27).Bike lanes may be replaced by a pathway per project.Shouldn't remove as TC 2 3 Rd,Victory Rd/Kodiak Dr) the Bike Master Plan Update. 2023 2024 Future Project to begin design in 2023. Stoddard Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Ra recommended. crossing, from Franklin Rd to Carlton Ave in accordance with the Downtown Meridian Consistent w/downtown plan from 3 4 East 03rd St,Franklin Rd/Carlton Ave(Phase 1) Neighborhood Plan. 2023 2024 Future Project to begin design in 2023. East 03rd St Franklin Rd/Carlton St 2012 4 5 Broadway Ave,West 07th St/West 04th St Complete sidewalks on the south side of Broadway Ave,between West 07th St and West 04th St 2024 Future Future Project to begin design in 2024. Broadway Ave,West 08th St/West 04th St Creek Way and detached concrete sidewalk with curbing between Goddard Creek Way and Wild Not Not Scoped.Developing area. ACHD to coordinate with the 5 7 JMcMillan Rd,Ten Mile Rd/Linder Rd Goose Way. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed City on the scope and timing of improvements, McMillan Rd,Ten Mile Rd/Linder Ro Remove mid-block cross-walk by Hillsdale and add enhanced cross-walks at Lachlan and near School zone and YMCA and City Park 6 NEW Stockenham Enhanced Cross-walks Rockhampton/Hill Park St.Update school zone signs and flashers destinations. 7 11 East 21/2 St,Carlton Ave/Fairview Ave Install sidewalk on the west and/or east side. 2024 Future Future Project to begin design in 2024. 02nd 1/2 St Carlton Ave/Fairview Ave Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion 8 14 Capulet Way at Siena Elementary Install crosswalk of Capulet Way on the west side of Siena Elementary school micro path Not Programmed Programmed Programmed into future IFYWP updates. Capulet Way Pedestrian Crossing(S/O Falcon Dr) Not Not 9 29 Main St and King Street Pedestrian Crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing of Main St atKing Street. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed ACHD traffic to evaluate request. Main St and Williams St Pedestrian Crossing McMillan Rd and Palantine Way Pedestrian Not Not 10 15 Crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing and curb ramps on McMillan Rd at Palantine Way. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed ACHD to prioritize and scope. McMillan Rd and Palantine Way Pedestrian Crossing Not Not ACHD to prioritize and scope arterial crossings when 11 10 IMeridian Rail-with-Trail Multi-use pathway along rail road tracks. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed pathway moves forward. Meridian Rail-with-Trail Locust Grove Rd and Woodbridge Dr Pedestrian Locust Grove Rd and Woodbridge Dr Pedestrian 12 16 Crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing of Locust Grove Rd at Woodbridge Dr or Watertower St 2023 2023 2024 Project to be built in 2024. Crossing Not Not 13 17 Eagle Rd,River Valley St/Ustick Rd Complete sidewalks on Eagle Rd,between River Valley Stand Ustick Rd Not Programmed Programmed Programmed ACHD to share request with ITD. Eagle Rd,River Valley St/Ustick Ra Extend roadway and construct streetscape improvements, including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and Duplicate w/roadway project.May improved UPRR crossing, from Carlton Ave to Fairview Ave in accordance with the Downtown Not Not be terminus from Fairview bike 14 NEW E.3rd Carlton to Fairview Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed East03rdSt,Carlton St/Fairview Ave(Phase 2) facilities. Not Not 15 30 Washington St,W.07th St/Main St Complete sidewalk on Washington St,between W.07th Stand Main St, Not Programmed Programmed Programmed ACHD to prioritize and scope project. Washington St 07th St/Main Si Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion Re-scope or add new?This project is 16 20 Taconic Dr/Pioneer Install crosswalk at intersection of Taconic and Pioneer(Hillsdale Subdivision) Not Programmed Programmed Programmed into future IFYWP updates. Taconic Dr and Pioneer Trail Ave Pedestrian Crossing on west side of Eagle Rd. Scoped o - Defer" in 2017 due to low pedestrian Amity and Mary McPherson Elementary School Not Not volumes. ACHD to reevaluate as conditions change in Amity Rd and Mary McPherson Elementary School 17 21 Pedestrian Signal Signalized pedestrian crossing. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed the area. Pedestrian Crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing(rectangular rapid flashing beacon)on Pine Ave at W 01st Not Not Scoped. To be evaluated and prioritized for possible 18 22 Pine Ave and W.1st St Pedestrian Crossing St to improve access to Meridian Elementary School Not Programmed Programmed Programmed inclusion in future IFYWP updates. Pine Ave and 01stSt Pedestrian Crossing Evaluation completed fall 2016 shows existing crossing Not Not =I meet needs of current users. ACHD to reevaluate as 19 23 Washington Stand W 1st St Pedestrian Crossing Pedestrian crossing near Meridian Elementary School. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed conditions change. Washington St and 01stSt Pedestrian Crossing Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion 20 24 Bower St,Meridian Rd/E.03rd St Complete sidewalks and add wayfinding signage on Bower St,between Meridian Rd and E.03rd St. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed into future IFYWP updates. Bower St Meridian Rd/03rd St Complete sidewalk on the north side of McMillan Rd, between Locust Grove Rd and Red Horse Not Not 21 1 1 McMillan Rd,Locust Grove Rd/Red Horse Way Way. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed ACHD to prioritize and scope. McMillan Rd,Locust Grove Rd/Red Horse Way Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 360 of 366 City of Meridian 2020 Prioritization Request Form Updates include adoption of the FY2020-2024 IFYWP. Programming status is subject to change. 2020 Current IFYWP Programming Status 2019 Construction Priority Priority Design YRROW YR YR Ranking Agency Project NameAgency Project Description Ranking Roads & Intersections WidenLocustGroveRdto5laneswithcurb,gutter,sidewalkandbikelanesinaccordancewiththe 1 Locust Grove Rd, Victory Rd / Overland Rd20192020-20212022 2016 CIP. 1 WidenLinderRdto5lanesandconstructanew4-lane1-84overpass,includingcurb,gutter, sidewalk,andbikelanesinaccordancewiththe2016CIP.Projectwouldbeajointprojectbetween 2 Linder Rd, Overland Rd / Franklin RdFutureFutureFuture ACHD and ITD 2 WidenLocustGroveRdto5laneswithcurb,gutter,sidewalk,andbikelanesinaccordancewithNot Not 5 Locust Grove Rd, Fairview Ave / Ustick RdNot Programmed the 2016 CIP.ProgrammedProgrammed 3 Widenintersectionto9lanesonFairviewAveand7lanesonLocustGroveRd,includingcurb, 6 Fairview Ave and Locust Grove Rd2020-202120212022 gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes in accordance with the 2016 CIP. 4 WidenEagleRdto5laneswithcurb,gutter,sidewalkandbikelanesinaccordancewiththe2016 7 Eagle Rd, Amity Rd / Victory Rd20182019-20202021 CIP. 5 WidenTenMileRdto5laneswithcurb,gutter,sidewalk,andbikelanesinaccordancewiththe 9 Ten Mile Rd, Victory Rd / Overland Rd201920202022-2023 2016 CIP. 6 WidenVictoryRdto3laneswithcurb,gutter,sidewalk,andbikelanesinaccordancewiththe2016Not Not 10 Victory Rd, Locust Grove Rd / Eagle RdNot Programmed CIP.ProgrammedProgrammed 7 WidenUstickRdto5laneswithcurb,gutter,sidewalk,andbikelanesinaccordancewiththe2016Not Not 18 Ustick Rd, Ten Mile Rd / Linder RdNot Programmed CIP.ProgrammedProgrammed 8 Not Not 14 Linder Rd, Cherry Ln / Ustick Rd Widen Linder Rd to 3 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes in accordance with 2016 CIP.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 9 Not Not 19 Locust Grove Rd, Amity Rd / Victory RdWiden Locust Grove Rd to 3 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 10 WidenVictoryRdto3laneswithcurb,gutter,sidewalk,andbikelanesinaccordancewiththe2016Not Not 20 Victory Rd, Meridian Rd / Locust Grove Rd Not Programmed CIP.ProgrammedProgrammed 11 Not Not 60 Ten Mile Rd / Cherry LnIntersection improvements to include dual left turn lanes.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 12 61 Eagle Rd / Overland RdIntersection improvements to include dual left turn lanes.FutureFutureFuture 13 Not Not 11 McMillan Rd, Meridian Rd / Locust Grove RdWiden McMillan Rd to 3 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 14 Not Not 12 McMillan Rd, Linder Rd / Meridian RdWiden McMillan Rd to 3 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 15 City of Meridian 2020 Prioritization Request Form City of Meridian 2020 Prioritization Request Form Updates include adoption of the FY2020-2024 IFYWP. Programming status is subject to change. Updates include adoption of the FY2020-2024 IFYWP. Programming status is subject to change. 2020 2019 Priority Priority Ranking Agency Project NameACHD ResponseACHD Implementation Project NameCity Comments Ranking High Priority Roads & Intersections Projects/Corridors Already commented on bike lanes / 1 Locust Grove Rd, Victory Rd / Overland RdProject to be built in 2022.Locust Grove Rd, Victory Rd / Overland Rd multi-use pathway. Priority corridor? 1 ProjectaddedtoIFYWPfordiscussionpurposes.ACHD tocoordinatewithITDonrequest.Projecttomove 2 Linder Rd, Overland Rd / Franklin RdLinder Rd, Overland Rd / Franklin RdCouncil priority project/corridor? forward when funding partnership is possible. 2 Need to discuss the cross-section and PerCityrequest,ACHDtocoordinatewithMeridianto if this should be a 3 or 5-lane facility. 5 Locust Grove Rd, Fairview Ave / Ustick RdLocust Grove Rd, Fairview Ave / Ustick Rd discuss scope.Priority corridor? 3 Scope changing to widen Fairview to Eagle concurrently (2019 priority #37; 6 Fairview Ave and Locust Grove RdProject to be built in 2022.Fairview Ave and Locust Grove Rd 2020 #34). Combine? 4 7 Eagle Rd, Amity Rd / Victory RdProject to be built in 2021.Eagle Rd, Amity Rd / Victory Rd 5 9 Ten Mile Rd, Victory Rd / Overland RdProject to be built in 2022-2023.Ten Mile Rd, Victory Rd / Overland Rd 6 Tobeevaluatedandprioritizedforpossibleinclusion 10 Victory Rd, Locust Grove Rd / Eagle RdVictory Rd, Locust Grove Rd / Eagle RdCouncil priority corridor? into future IFYWP updates. 7 Possibly move up. Key corridor to Tobeevaluatedandprioritizedforpossibleinclusion new Owyhee HS. Council Priority 18 Ustick Rd, Ten Mile Rd / Linder RdUstick Rd, Ten Mile Rd / Linder Rd into future IFYWP updates.Corridor? 8 Need to review cross-section Tobeevaluatedandprioritizedforpossibleinclusion including number of lanes. Priority 14 Linder Rd, Cherry Ln / Ustick Rd Linder Rd, Cherry Ln / Ustick Rd into future IFYWP updates.corridor? 9 Tobeevaluatedandprioritizedforpossibleinclusion 19 Locust Grove Rd, Amity Rd / Victory RdLocust Grove Rd, Amity Rd / Victory RdPriority corridor? into future IFYWP updates. 10 Tobeevaluatedandprioritizedforpossibleinclusion 20 Victory Rd, Meridian Rd / Locust Grove Rd Victory Rd, SH 69 (Meridian Rd) / Locust Grove RdPriority corridor? into future IFYWP updates. 11 ACHDtoprioritizedforpossibleinclusioninfuture 60 Ten Mile Rd / Cherry LnTen Mile Rd and Cherry Ln IFYWP updates. 12 ProjectaddedtoIFYWPfordiscussionpurposes.ACHD tocoordinatewithITDonrequest.Projecttomove 61 Eagle Rd / Overland RdOverland Rd and Eagle Rd forward when funding partnership is possible. 13 Tobeevaluatedandprioritizedforpossibleinclusion 11 McMillan Rd, Meridian Rd / Locust Grove RdMcMillan Rd, SH 69 (Meridian Rd) / Locust Grove Rd into future IFYWP updates. 14 Tobeevaluatedandprioritizedforpossibleinclusion 12 McMillan Rd, Linder Rd / Meridian RdMcMillan Rd, Linder Rd / SH 69 (Meridian Rd) into future IFYWP updates. 15 2020 Current IFYWP Programming Status 2019 Construction Priority Priority Design YRROW YR YR Ranking Agency Project NameAgency Project Description Ranking Constructamulti-laneroundaboutwith2lanesonLocustGrovelegsand1laneonVictorylegsin 13 Victory Rd and Locust Grove Rd Roundabout201920202021 accordance with the 2016 CIP. 16 WidenintersectionoraddroundaboutinaccordancewiththeMasterStreetMap.Trafficanalysis 24 Ten Mile Rd and Victory Rd 2019-202020202022-2023 should determine the ultimate lane configuration based on above projects in the area. 17 WidenMeridianRdto3laneswithcurb,gutter,sidewalk,andbikelanesinaccordancewiththeNot Not 25 Meridian Rd, McMillan Rd / Chinden Blvd Not Programmed 2016 CIP.ProgrammedProgrammed 18 WidenLocustGroveRdto3laneswithcurb,gutter,sidewalk,andbikelanesinaccordancewithNot Not 15 Locust Grove Rd, Ustick Rd / McMillan RdNot Programmed the 2016 CIP.ProgrammedProgrammed 19 WidenMeridianRdto3laneswithcurb,gutter,sidewalk,andbikelanesinaccordancewiththeNot Not 16 Meridian Rd, Ustick Rd / McMillan Rd Not Programmed 2016 CIP.ProgrammedProgrammed 20 Widenandsignalizeintersectionto4/5lanesonEagleand315lanesonLakeinaccordancewith 21 Lake Hazel Rd and Eagle Rd202020212023 the 2016 CIP. 21 Widenandsignalizeintersectionto5lanesonLinderRdand6lanesonOverlandRdinaccordanceNot Not 22 Overland Rd and Linder Rd Not Programmed with the 2016 CIP .ProgrammedProgrammed 22 Not Not 23 Ustick Rd and Black Cat RdConstruct a dual lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 23 Ustick, Black Cat to Ten MileWiden to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. 24 Victory, Linder to MeridianWiden 25 Eagle Rd and Amity Rd Roundabout (Dual Widenroundabouttoaduallaneroundabout,withcurb,gutter,sidewalk,andbikelanes.ProjectNot Not 30 Not Programmed Lane)to be constructed concurrently with Eagle Rd, Amity Rd / Victory Rd.ProgrammedProgrammed 26 Not Not 31 Franklin Rd, McDermott Rd / Black Cat RdWiden Franklin Rd to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 27 Not Not 62 Eagle Rd / Franklin RdNot providedNot Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 28 32 Ten Mile Rd and Amity RdConstruct a roundabout. Project includes bridge #205AX.20182019-20202021 29 Widenintersectionto4lanesLinderRdand5/6lanesonCherryLninaccordancewiththe2016Not Not 33 Cherry Ln and Linder Rd Not Programmed CIP.ProgrammedProgrammed 30 Widenintersectionto5/6lanesonBlackCatRdand5lanesonCherryLninaccordancewiththeNot Not 34 Cherry Ln and Black Cat Rd Not Programmed 2016 CIP.ProgrammedProgrammed 31 WidenFairviewAveto7laneswithcurb,gutter,sidewalk,andbikelanesinaccordancewiththeNot Not 35 Fairview Ave, SH 55 (Eagle Rd) / Cloverdale RdNot Programmed 2016 CIP. ProgrammedProgrammed 32 Linder Rd, Chinden Blvd (US 20/26) / SH 44 (State WidenLinderRdinaccordancewiththe2016CIP.Crosssectiontobedeterminedthroughconcept 36 2024FutureFuture St) design. Project includes bridges #1078, #2033, #2034, #2035, and #2036. 33 WidenFairviewAveto7laneswithcurb,gutter,sidewalk,andbikelanesinaccordancewiththeNot Not 37 Fairview Ave, Locust Grove Rd / SH 55 (Eagle Rd)Not Programmed 2016 CIP.ProgrammedProgrammed 34 WidenFairviewAveto7laneswithcurb,gutter,sidewalk,andbikelanesinaccordancewiththeNot Not 38 Fairview Ave, Meridian Rd / Locust Grove Rd Not Programmed 2016 CIP.ProgrammedProgrammed 35 Not Not 39 Cherry Ln, Linder Rd / Meridian RdWiden Cherry Ln to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 36 ImprovesafetyandtrafficoperationsalongFairviewAveinaccordancewiththeFairviewAvenue Fairview Ave Corridor Management, Linder Not Not CorridorManagementStrategy.Projectmayincludebicycleandpedestrianfacilitiesandother 40 Not Programmed Rd / Orchard St access management treatments.ProgrammedProgrammed 37 Not Not 41 Ten Mile Rd, Amity Rd / Victory RdWiden Ten Mile Rd to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 38 2020 2019 Priority Priority Ranking Agency Project NameACHD ResponseACHD Implementation Project NameCity Comments Ranking Roads & Intersections 13 Victory Rd and Locust Grove Rd RoundaboutProject to be built in 2021.Victory Rd and Locust Grove Rd RoundaboutPriority corridors? 16 24 Ten Mile Rd and Victory Rd Project to be built in 2022-2023.Ten Mile Rd and Victory RdPriority corridor - Victory? 17 25 Meridian Rd, McMillan Rd / Chinden Blvd Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better.Meridian Rd, McMillan Rd / US 20/26 (Chinden Blvd) 18 Need to review cross-section Tobeevaluatedandprioritizedforpossibleinclusion including number of lanes. See mile 15 Locust Grove Rd, Ustick Rd / McMillan RdLocust Grove Rd, Ustick Rd / McMillan Rd into future IFYWP updates.segment south. Priority corridor? 19 Tobeevaluatedandprioritizedforpossibleinclusion 16 Meridian Rd, Ustick Rd / McMillan Rd Meridian Rd, Ustick Rd / McMillan Rd into future IFYWP updates. 20 21 Lake Hazel Rd and Eagle RdProject to be built in 2023.Lake Hazel Rd and Eagle Rd 21 See prioirty project #2, Linder Rd 22 Overland Rd and Linder Rd Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better.Overland Rd and Linder Rd Overpass 22 Ustick a priority corridor? Owyhee 23 Ustick Rd and Black Cat RdDefer. Operating at a LOS D or better.Ustick Rd and Black Cat Rd HS. 23 Key cooridor to Owyhee HS. Priority Ustick, Black Cat to Ten Mile corridor? 24 Victory, Linder to Meridian Priority corridor? 25 Eagle Rd and Amity Rd Roundabout (Dual 30 To be built by development.Eagle Rd and Amity Rd Roundabout (Dual Lane) Lane) 26 Tobeevaluatedandprioritizedforpossibleinclusion 31 Franklin Rd, McDermott Rd / Black Cat RdFranklin Rd, McDermott Rd / Black Cat RdLast mile in Ada Co. not widened. into future IFYWP updates. 27 Tobeevaluatedandprioritizedforpossibleinclusion 62 Eagle Rd / Franklin RdEagle Rd and Franklin Rd into future IFYWP updates. 28 32 Ten Mile Rd and Amity RdProject to be built in 2021.Ten Mile Rd and Amity Rd 29 Tobeevaluatedandprioritizedforpossibleinclusion 33 Cherry Ln and Linder Rd Cherry Ln and Linder Rd into future IFYWP updates. 30 34 Cherry Ln and Black Cat Rd Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better.Cherry Ln and Black Cat Rd 31 35 Fairview Ave, SH 55 (Eagle Rd) / Cloverdale RdDefer. Operating at a LOS D or better.Fairview Ave, SH 55 (Eagle Rd) / Cloverdale Rd 32 Linder Rd, Chinden Blvd (US 20/26) / SH 44 (State 36 Project to begin design in 2024.Linder Rd, Chinden Blvd (US 20/26) / SH 44 (State St) St) 33 EvaluatingforpossibleinclusionwithFairviewandSee priority #6 from 2019, 37 Fairview Ave, Locust Grove Rd / SH 55 (Eagle Rd)Fairview Ave, Locust Grove Rd / SH 55 (Eagle Rd) Locust Grove intersection.Fairview/LG INT. move up? 34 38 Fairview Ave, Meridian Rd / Locust Grove Rd Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better.Fairview Ave, Meridian Rd / Locust Grove Rd 35 Defer.OperatingataLOSDorbetter.Nota2016CIP 39 Cherry Ln, Linder Rd / Meridian RdCherry Ln, Linder Rd / Meridian Rd Project. 36 Projecttobeimplementedthroughdevelopment. Fairview Ave Corridor Management, Linder Fairview Ave Corridor Management, Linder Rd / ACHDandMeridiantocoordinateimplementationas 40 Rd / Orchard St development applications are processed.Orchard St 37 41 Ten Mile Rd, Amity Rd / Victory RdDefer. Operating at a LOS D. Not a 2016 CIP Project.Ten Mile Rd, Amity Rd / Victory Rd 38 2020 Current IFYWP Programming Status 2019 Construction Priority Priority Design YRROW YR YR Ranking Agency Project NameAgency Project Description Ranking Extendroadwayandconstructstreetscapeimprovements,includingcurb,gutter,sidewalk,and East 03rd St Extension, Carlton St / Fairview Ave Not Not improvedUPRRcrossing,fromCarltonAvetoFairviewAveinaccordancewiththeDowntown 42 Not Programmed (Phase 2) Meridian Neighborhood Plan.ProgrammedProgrammed 39 Broadway Ave / Idaho Ave Extension, EastNot Not 43 Not providedNot Programmed 06th St / Locust Grove RdProgrammedProgrammed 40 Not Not 44 McMillan Rd and Black Cat RdConstruct a multi-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP .Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 41 Widenintersectionto3/4lanesonAmityand314lanesonBlackCatinaccordancewiththe2016Not Not 45 Amity Rd and Black Cat Rd Not Programmed CIP.ProgrammedProgrammed 42 Not Not 46 McMillan Rd and Star RdConstruct a multi-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 43 Not Not 47 Amity Rd and Linder RdConstruct a single-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 44 Not Not 48 Cherry Ln and McDermott RdWiden intersection to 3 lanes on McDermott and 5 lanes on Cherry.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 45 Not Not 49 Franklin Rd and McDermott RdConstruct a single-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 46 Widenintersectionto3lanesonMcDermottand4lanesonUstickinaccordancewiththe2016Not Not 50 Ustick Rd and McDermott Rd Not Programmed CIP.ProgrammedProgrammed 47 Widenandsignalizeintersectionto3/4lanesonMcDermottand3lanesoninaccordancewiththeNot Not 51 McMillan Rd and McDermott Rd UstickNot Programmed 2016 CIP.ProgrammedProgrammed 48 Not Not 52 Ustick Rd and Star Rd Construct a single-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 49 Not Not 53 Ten Mile Rd and Chateau DrSignalize intersection.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 50 Not Not 54 Lake Hazel Rd and Locust Grove RdConstruct a single-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 51 Widenandsignalizeintersectionto3/4lanesonLocustGroveand5/6lanesonAmityinNot Not 55 Amity Rd and Locust Grove RdNot Programmed accordance with the 2016 CIP .ProgrammedProgrammed 52 Not Not 56 Victory Rd and Linder RdConstruct a single-lane roundabout in accordance with the 2016 CIP.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 53 Locust Grove Rd, McMillan Rd / Chinden WidenLocustGroveRdto3laneswithcurb,gutter,sidewalk,andbikelanesinaccordancewithNot Not 57 Not Programmed Blvd (US 20/26)the 2016 CIP.ProgrammedProgrammed 54 Not Not 58 Ustick Rd, McDermott Rd / Black Cat RdWiden Ustick Rd to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 55 Not Not 59 Pine, Linder to Meridian Widen to 3 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalks and/or multi-use or mixed-use bikeway.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 56 Not Not 63 Eagle Rd / Fairview AveNot providedNot Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 57 Lake Hazel / Discovery ParkIntersection improvements. 58 Amity, Eagle to CloverdaleWiden to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. 59 Amity, Locust Grove to EagleWiden 60 2020 2019 Priority Priority Ranking Agency Project NameACHD ResponseACHD Implementation Project NameCity Comments Ranking Roads & Intersections East 03rd St Extension, Carlton St / Fairview Ave 42 Defer until completion of Phase 1 (Franklin to Carlton).East 03rd St, Carlton St / Fairview Ave (Phase 2) (Phase 2) 39 Need connection into downtown from Locust Grove; Pine is the only Broadway Ave / Idaho Ave Extension, EastBroadway Ave / Idaho Ave Extension, 06th St / Locust connection currently. Likely largely 43 Defer. To be considered as properties redevelopment. 06th St / Locust Grove RdGrove Rddevelopment driven. 40 44 McMillan Rd and Black Cat RdDefer. Operating at a LOS D or better.McMillan Rd and Black Cat Rd 41 45 Amity Rd and Black Cat Rd Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better.Amity Rd and Black Cat Rd 42 46 McMillan Rd and Star RdDefer. Operating at a LOS D or better.McMillan Rd and Star Rd 43 47 Amity Rd and Linder RdDefer. Operating at a LOS D or better.Amity Rd and Linder Rd 44 Defer.OperatingataLOSDorbetter.Notincludedin 48 Cherry Ln and McDermott RdCherry Ln and McDermott Rd the 2016 CIP. 45 49 Franklin Rd and McDermott RdDefer. Operating at a LOS D or better.Franklin Rd and McDermott Rd 46 50 Ustick Rd and McDermott Rd Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better.Ustick Rd and McDermott Rd 47 51 McMillan Rd and McDermott Rd UstickDefer. Operating at a LOS D or better.McMillan Rd and McDermott Rd 48 52 Ustick Rd and Star Rd Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better.Ustick Rd and Star Rd 49 Doesnotcurrentlymeetwarrants.ACHDtoreevaluate 53 Ten Mile Rd and Chateau DrTen Mile Rd and Chateau Dr as development occurs in the area. 50 54 Lake Hazel Rd and Locust Grove RdDefer. Operating at a LOS D or better.Lake Hazel Rd and Locust Grove Rd 51 55 Amity Rd and Locust Grove RdDefer. Operating at a LOS D or better.Amity Rd and Locust Grove Rd 52 56 Victory Rd and Linder RdDefer. Operating at a LOS D or better.Victory Rd and Linder RdPrioirity corridors; move up? 53 Locust Grove Rd, McMillan Rd / Chinden Locust Grove Rd, McMillan Rd / US 20/26 (Chinden 57 Defer. Operating at a LOS D or better. Blvd (US 20/26)Blvd) 54 Defer.OperatingataLOSDorbetter.NotincludedinKey cooridor to Owyhee HS. Priority 58 Ustick Rd, McDermott Rd / Black Cat RdUstick Rd, McDermott Rd / Black Cat Rd the 2016 CIP.corridor? 55 Tobeevaluatedandprioritizedforpossibleinclusion 59 Pine, Linder to Meridian Pine Ave, Linder Rd / Meridian Rd into future IFYWP updates. 56 Tobeevaluatedandprioritizedforpossibleinclusion 63 Eagle Rd / Fairview AveEagle Rd and Fairview Ave into future IFYWP updates. 57 Lake Hazel / Discovery ParkParks request. 58 Pedestiran improvemetns are needed as are intersection upgrades at Amity, Eagle to Cloverdale Hillsdale Avenue. 59 Amity, Locust Grove to Eagle 60 2020 Current IFYWP Programming Status 2019 Construction Priority Priority Design YRROW YR YR Ranking Agency Project NameAgency Project Description Ranking Victory, Ten Mile to LinderWiden 61 Black Cat, Cherry to UstickWiden 62 Black Cat, Franklin to CherryWiden 63 Black Cat, Ustick to McMillanWiden 64 Black Cat, McMillan to ChindenWiden 65 McMillan, Black Cat to Ten MileWiden 66 McMillan, Ten Mile to LinderWiden 67 Eagle, Lake Hazel to AmityWiden 68 Locust Grove, Lake Hazel to Amity3-lane? 69 Community Programs ConstructadetachedasphaltorconcretepathwayoneastsideofLocustGrovebetweenPuffin 2 Locust Grove Rd, Overland Rd / Puffin St20192020-20212022 Stand Overland Rd. 1 ReconstructStoddardRd,betweenVictoryRdandOverlandRdto3-lanes,7'attachedsidewalks andbikelanes.Projectincludesbridge#2085andanenhancedpedestriancrossing(pedestrian Stoddard Rd, Victory Rd / Overland Rd (Stoddard hybridbeacon)atVictoryandStoddard(CM214-27).Bikelanesmaybereplacedbyapathwayper 3 20232024Future Rd, Victory Rd / Kodiak Dr)the Bike Master Plan Update. 2 Constructstreetscapeimprovements,includingcurb,gutter,sidewalk,andimprovedUPRR 4 East 03rd St, Franklin Rd / Carlton Ave (Phase 1)20232024Future crossing, from Franklin Rd to Carlton Ave in accordance with the Downtown Meridian 3 5 Broadway Ave, West 07th St / West 04th StComplete sidewalks on the south side of Broadway Ave, between West 07th St and West 04th St.2024FutureFuture 4 InstallextrudedcurbpathwayonnorthsideofMcMillanRdbetweenCortonaWayandGoddardNot Not 7 McMillan Rd, Ten Mile Rd / Linder RdNot Programmed Creek Way and detached concrete sidewalk with curbing between Goddard Creek Way and Wild ProgrammedProgrammed 5 Remove mid-block cross-walk by Hillsdale and add enhanced cross-walks at Lachlan and near NEWStockenham Enhanced Cross-walks Rockhampton/Hill Park St. Update school zone signs and flashers. 6 11 East 2 1/2 St, Carlton Ave / Fairview AveInstall sidewalk on the west and/or east side.2024FutureFuture 7 Not Not 14 Capulet Way at Siena Elementary Install crosswalk of Capulet Way on the west side of Siena Elementary school micro path.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 8 Not Not 29 Main St and King Street Pedestrian CrossingInstall an enhanced pedestrian crossing of Main St at King Street.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 9 McMillan Rd and Palantine Way Pedestrian Not Not 15 Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing and curb ramps on McMillan Rd at Palantine Way.Not Programmed CrossingProgrammedProgrammed 10 Not Not 10 Meridian Rail-with-TrailMulti-use pathway along rail road tracks.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 11 Locust Grove Rd and Woodbridge Dr Pedestrian 16 Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing of Locust Grove Rd at Woodbridge Dr or Watertower St.202320232024 Crossing 12 Not Not 17 Eagle Rd, River Valley St / Ustick RdComplete sidewalks on Eagle Rd, between River Valley Stand Ustick Rd.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 13 Extendroadwayandconstructstreetscapeimprovements,includingcurb,gutter,sidewalk,and Not Not improvedUPRRcrossing,fromCarltonAvetoFairviewAveinaccordancewiththeDowntown NEWE. 3rd Carlton to FairviewNot Programmed Meridian Neighborhood Plan.ProgrammedProgrammed 14 Not Not 30 Washington St, W. 07th St / Main StComplete sidewalk on Washington St, between W. 07th Stand Main St.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 15 Not Not 20 Taconic Dr / PioneerInstall crosswalk at intersection of Taconic and Pioneer (Hillsdale Subdivision).Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 16 2020 2019 Priority Priority Ranking Agency Project NameACHD ResponseACHD Implementation Project NameCity Comments Ranking Victory, Ten Mile to Linder 61 Roads & Intersections Black Cat, Cherry to Ustick 62 Black Cat, Franklin to Cherry 63 Black Cat, Ustick to McMillan 64 Black Cat, McMillan to Chinden 65 McMillan, Black Cat to Ten Mile 66 McMillan, Ten Mile to Linder 67 Eagle, Lake Hazel to Amity 68 Locust Grove, Lake Hazel to Amity 69 Community ProgramsCommunity Programs 2 Locust Grove Rd, Overland Rd / Puffin StProject to be built in 2022.Locust Grove Rd, Victory Rd / Overland Rd 1 NEED to keep on list as it is a VRF Stoddard Rd, Victory Rd / Overland Rd (Stoddard project. Shouldn't remove as TC 3 Project to begin design in 2023.Stoddard Rd, Victory Rd / Overland Rd Rd, Victory Rd / Kodiak Dr)recommended. 2 Consistent w/ downtown plan from 4 East 03rd St, Franklin Rd / Carlton Ave (Phase 1)Project to begin design in 2023.East 03rd St, Franklin Rd / Carlton St 2012 3 5 Broadway Ave, West 07th St / West 04th StProject to begin design in 2024.Broadway Ave, West 08th St / West 04th St 4 Scoped.Developingarea.ACHDtocoordinatewiththe 7 McMillan Rd, Ten Mile Rd / Linder RdMcMillan Rd, Ten Mile Rd / Linder Rd City on the scope and timing of improvements. 5 School zone and YMCA and City Park NEWStockenham Enhanced Cross-walks destinations. 6 11 East 2 1/2 St, Carlton Ave / Fairview AveProject to begin design in 2024.02nd 1/2 St, Carlton Ave / Fairview Ave 7 Tobeevaluatedandprioritizedforpossibleinclusion 14 Capulet Way at Siena Elementary Capulet Way Pedestrian Crossing (S/O Falcon Dr) into future IFYWP updates. 8 29 Main St and King Street Pedestrian CrossingACHD traffic to evaluate request.Main St and Williams St Pedestrian Crossing 9 McMillan Rd and Palantine Way Pedestrian 15 ACHD to prioritize and scope.McMillan Rd and Palantine Way Pedestrian Crossing Crossing 10 ACHDtoprioritizeandscopearterialcrossingswhen 10 Meridian Rail-with-TrailMeridian Rail-with-Trail pathway moves forward. 11 Locust Grove Rd and Woodbridge Dr Pedestrian Locust Grove Rd and Woodbridge Dr Pedestrian 16 Project to be built in 2024. CrossingCrossing 12 17 Eagle Rd, River Valley St / Ustick RdACHD to share request with ITD.Eagle Rd, River Valley St / Ustick Rd 13 Duplicate w/ roadway project. May be terminus from Fairview bike NEWE. 3rd Carlton to FairviewEast 03rd St, Carlton St / Fairview Ave (Phase 2) facilities. 14 30 Washington St, W. 07th St / Main StACHD to prioritize and scope project.Washington St, 07th St / Main St 15 TobeevaluatedandprioritizedforpossibleinclusionRe-scope or add new? This project is 20 Taconic Dr / PioneerTaconic Dr and Pioneer Trail Ave Pedestrian Crossing into future IFYWP updates.on west side of Eagle Rd. 16 2020 Current IFYWP Programming Status 2019 Construction Priority Priority Design YRROW YR YR Ranking Agency Project NameAgency Project Description Ranking Amity and Mary McPherson Elementary School Not Not 21 Signalized pedestrian crossing.Not Programmed Pedestrian SignalProgrammedProgrammed 17 Installanenhancedpedestriancrossing(rectangularrapidflashingbeacon)onPineAveatW01stNot Not 22 Pine Ave and W. 1st St Pedestrian Crossing Not Programmed St to improve access to Meridian Elementary School.ProgrammedProgrammed 18 Not Not 23 Washington Stand W 1st St Pedestrian CrossingPedestrian crossing near Meridian Elementary School.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 19 Not Not 24 Bower St, Meridian Rd / E. 03rd St Complete sidewalks and add wayfinding signage on Bower St, between Meridian Rd and E. 03rd St.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 20 CompletesidewalkonthenorthsideofMcMillanRd,betweenLocustGroveRdandRedHorseNot Not 1 McMillan Rd, Locust Grove Rd / Red Horse WayNot Programmed Way.ProgrammedProgrammed 21 25 Linder Rd, 1-84 / Franklin RdComplete sidewalks the west side on Linder Rd, between 1-84 and Franklin Rd.FutureFutureFuture 22 Not Not 27 Linder Rd, Washington St / Maple St Complete sidewalk on the west side of Linder Rd, between Washington St and Maple St.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 23 Not Not 28 Victory Rd, Glacier Bay Way / Mesa WayComplete sidewalk on the south side adjacent to county parcel.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 24 31 Locust Grove Rd and Palermo Dr Pedestrian SignalInstall an enhanced pedestrian signal and lighting on the north side of Palermo at Locust Grove.20232023Future 25 W 08th St and Meridian Middle School Pedestrian 32 Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing on 8th St at Meridian Middle School.202020202021 Crossing 26 InstallanenhancedpedestriancrossingofMeridianRdat/nearSettlersParkentranceandNot Not 34 Meridian, north of Ustick Not Programmed Sundance Subdivision micropath.ProgrammedProgrammed 27 Not Not 35 Chinden Blvd, east of Ten Mile RdComplete sidewalks on Chinden Blvd, east of Ten Mile Rd.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 28 Locust Grove Rd and Time Zone Dr Pedestrian 36 Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing of Locust Grove Rd at Time Zone Dr.20192020-20212022 Crossing 29 Not Not 37 Taormina Drive at Maesaia WayInstall sidewalk on south side of Taormina Drive near Maesaia Way.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 30 Not Not 38 Woodbridge Neighborhood Bike StudyStudy the connectivity and bikeability of the Woodbridge neighborhood.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 31 Not Not 42 Watertower St at Rebound SchoolInstall a painted crosswalk on Watertower St at Rebound School.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 32 Not Not 43 Linder Rd, Chateau Dr / Barbara Morgan STEMWay finding signage on Linder.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 33 Not Not 44 St. Ignatius School Pedestrian SignalPedestrian signal on Meridian Road at Producer.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 34 NEWBridgetower Pedestrian SignalPedestrian signal on Ustick Road at Bridgetower (Towerbridge?) Drive. 35 Pedestrianconnection(sidewalk)betweenBarbaraDriveinFairviewTerraceParktoE. NEWFairview Terrace to Chief Joseph Willowbrook Drive and Chief Joseph Elementary on Chateau Drive. 36 2020 2019 Priority Priority Ranking Agency Project NameACHD ResponseACHD Implementation Project NameCity Comments Ranking Scoped"Go-Defer"in2017duetolowpedestrian Roads & Intersections Amity and Mary McPherson Elementary School Amity Rd and Mary McPherson Elementary School volumes.ACHDtoreevaluateasconditionschangein 21 Pedestrian Signalthe area.Pedestrian Crossing 17 Scoped.Tobeevaluatedandprioritizedforpossible 22 Pine Ave and W. 1st St Pedestrian Crossing Pine Ave and 01st St Pedestrian Crossing inclusion in future IFYWP updates. 18 Evaluationcompletedfall2016showsexistingcrossing meetneedsofcurrentusers.ACHDtoreevaluateas 23 Washington Stand W 1st St Pedestrian CrossingWashington St and 01st St Pedestrian Crossing conditions change. 19 Tobeevaluatedandprioritizedforpossibleinclusion 24 Bower St, Meridian Rd / E. 03rd St Bower St, Meridian Rd / 03rd St into future IFYWP updates. 20 1 McMillan Rd, Locust Grove Rd / Red Horse WayACHD to prioritize and scope.McMillan Rd, Locust Grove Rd / Red Horse Way 21 ProjectaddedtoIFYWPfordiscussionpurposes.ACHD tocoordinatewithITDonrequest.Projecttomove 25 Linder Rd, 1-84 / Franklin RdLinder Rd, Overland Rd / Franklin Rd forward when funding partnership is possible. 22 27 Linder Rd, Washington St / Maple St Complete pedestrian facilities existing in this section.Linder Rd, Washington St / Maple St 23 Scoped.Tobeevaluatedandprioritizedforpossible 28 Victory Rd, Glacier Bay Way / Mesa WayVictory Rd, Glacier Bay / Mesa Way inclusion into future IFYWP updates. 24 31 Locust Grove Rd and Palermo Dr Pedestrian SignalProject to begin design in 2023.Locust Grove Rd and Palermo Dr Pedestrian Crossing 25 W 08th St and Meridian Middle School Pedestrian Enhanced School Crossings - Meridian Middle School 32 Project to be built in 2021. Crossingand Capital High School 26 TobeevaluatedandprioritizedforpossibleinclusionMeridian Rd Pedestrian Crossings (Settlers Park 34 Meridian, north of Ustick into future IFYWP updates.Entrance / Sundance Sub Micropath) 27 35 Chinden Blvd, east of Ten Mile RdACHD to share request with ITD.Chinden Blvd, EO Ten Mile Rd 28 Locust Grove Rd and Time Zone Dr Pedestrian 36 Project to be built in 2022.Locust Grove Rd, Victory Rd / Overland Rd Crossing 29 Tobeevaluatedandprioritizedforpossibleinclusion 37 Taormina Drive at Maesaia WayTaormina Dr at Maesaia Way into future IFYWP updates. 30 38 Woodbridge Neighborhood Bike StudyACHD to evaluate as part of future budgeting efforts.Woodbridge Neighborhood Bike StudyComp Plan related. 31 ACHDTrafficEngineeringdoesnotrecommend 42 Watertower St at Rebound SchoolWatertower St and Rebound School Pedestrian CrossingWASD request installation. Crossing activity is caused by parent drop 32 ACHDTrafficbelievescurrentsignageisadequate.No 43 Linder Rd, Chateau Dr / Barbara Morgan STEMLinder Rd, Chateau Dr / Barber Morgan STEMWASD request additional signage recommended. 33 44 St. Ignatius School Pedestrian SignalScoped in summer 2019. Final report pending. Meridian Rd and Producer DrSchool request 34 NEWBridgetower Pedestrian Signal 35 NEWFairview Terrace to Chief Joseph 36 2020 Current IFYWP Programming Status 2019 Construction Priority Priority Design YRROW YR YR Ranking Agency Project NameAgency Project Description Ranking NEWAmity, Eagle to HillsdalePedestrian improvements on Amity to the YMCA and City Park. 37 CompletesidewalkonbothsidesofWest02nd,betweentheUnionPacificRailroadandBroadwayNot Not 12 West 02nd St, UPRR / Broadway AveNot Programmed Ave to address parking concerns in this area.ProgrammedProgrammed 38 13 Locust Grove Rd, Paradise Ln / Grand Canyon DrAsphalt path on the east side of Locust Grove Rd to connect with an existing path to the school.CompletedCompletedCompleted 39 Not Not 19 Kentucky Ridge Way, Riodosa Dr / Victory Rd Sidewalk on the west side of Kentucky Ridge Way, between Victory and Riodosa.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 40 Not Not 26 State Ave, East 2nd St / Cathy LnSidewalk repair. Requested by land owner in this area.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 41 Nola Rd and Crossroads Middle School Pedestrian Not Not 39 Install a painted crosswalk on Nola Rd at Crossroads Middle School.Not Programmed CrossingProgrammedProgrammed 42 Not Not 40 Nola Rd, south of Pine Ave Middle SchoolConstruct sidewalk on the east side of Nola Rd from Pine Ave to Crossroads.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed 43 Eagle Rd, Amity Rd / Victory Rd (Eagle Rd, Zaldia WidenEagleRdto5laneswithcurb,gutter,sidewalkandbikelanesinaccordancewiththe2016 8 20182019-20202021 Dr / Victory Rd)CIP. WidenLinderRdto5laneswithcurb,gutter,sidewalk,andbikelanesinaccordancewiththe2016 9 Linder Rd, Franklin Rd / Pine Ave2017-201820192020 CIP. Project includes upgrade of the Union Pacific Railroad crossing and bridge #131. Not Not 41 Carlton Ave, W 01st St / Meridian Rd Construct sidewalk on the south side of Carlton Ave from W 01st St and Meridian Rd.Not Programmed ProgrammedProgrammed Victory Rd and Standing Timber Ave Pedestrian 33 Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing and curb ramps on Victory Rd at Standing Timber Ave.2018N/A2020 Crossing (Victory Rd, west of Mesa) 2020 2019 Priority Priority Ranking Agency Project NameACHD ResponseACHD Implementation Project NameCity Comments Ranking Gaps on Amity need to be filled for Roads & Intersections NEWAmity, Eagle to Hillsdale access to destinations. 37 Sidewalkscoped"NoGo"in2015.Agenciesto 12 West 02nd St, UPRR / Broadway AveWest 02nd, UPRR / Broadway Ave coordinate if other solutions identified. 38 Not ultimate configuration; need 13 Locust Grove Rd, Paradise Ln / Grand Canyon DrConstruction completed in 2010.Locust Grove Rd, Paradise Ln / Grand Canyon Dr concrete. 39 Scoped"Go-Defer"in2015.Sidewalkexistsonthe 19 Kentucky Ridge Way, Riodosa Dr / Victory Rd Kentucky Ridge Way, Riodosa Dr / Victory Rd east side. ACHD to reevaluate if existing sidewalk does 40 Scoped"NoGo"in2015.Thissectionhasconnectivity alreadyonthesouthsideandtheoriginalrequestorno 26 State Ave, East 2nd St / Cathy LnState Ave, 2nd St / Cathy Ln longer owns the property. 41 Nola Rd and Crossroads Middle School Pedestrian Scoped "No Go" in 2018 as issues are caused by drop-off Nola Rd and Crossroads Middle School Pedestrian 39 Crossingactivities. Encourage school to work with parents.Crossing 42 Scoped"NoGo"in2018.Sidewalkoneastsidetobe 40 Nola Rd, south of Pine Ave Middle SchoolNola Rd, Pine Ave / Crossroads Middle School built through development. 43 Eagle Rd, Amity Rd / Victory Rd (Eagle Rd, Zaldia 8 Project to be built in 2021.Eagle Rd, Amity Rd / Victory RdRemove; roadway project. Dr / Victory Rd) 9 Linder Rd, Franklin Rd / Pine AveProject to be built in 2020.Linder Rd, Franklin Rd / Pine AveRemove; in CN SchoolDistrictrebuiltsidewalkonthesouthside 41 Carlton Ave, W 01st St / Meridian Rd Carlton Ave, 01st St / Meridian RdComplete resolving issues in this area. Victory Rd and Standing Timber Ave Pedestrian Victory Rd and Standing Timber Ave Pedestrian 33 Project to be built in 2020.Remove Crossing (Victory Rd, west of Mesa)Crossing Programming2020 2019 Current lFYWP Construction Priority Priority Ranking Ranking Agency Project Name Agency Project Description '' • YR ACHD Response Project added to IFYWP for discussion purposes.ACHD to coordinate with ITD on request. Project to move 22 25 Linder Rd,1-84/Franklin Rd Complete sidewalks the west side on Linder Rd,between 1-84 and Franklin Rd Future Future Future forward when funding partnership is possible. Linder Rd,Overland Rd/Franklin Ra Not Not 23 27 Linder Rd,Washington St/Maple St Complete sidewalk on the west side of Linder Rd,between Washington St and Maple St Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Complete pedestrian facilities existing in this section Linder Rd,Washington St/Maple Si Not Not Scoped. To be evaluated and prioritized for possible 24 28 Victory Rd,Glacier Bay Way/Mesa Way Complete sidewalk on the south side adjacent to county parcel Not Programmed Programmed Programmed inclusion into future IFYWP updates. Victory Rd,Glacier Bay/Mesa Way 25 31 Locust Grove Rd and Palermo Dr Pedestrian Signal Install an enhanced pedestrian signal and lighting on the north side of Palermo at Locust Grove 2023 2023 Future Project to begin design in 2023. Locust Grove Rd and Palermo Or Pedestrian Crossing W 08th St and Meridian Middle School Pedestrian Enhanced School Crossings-Meridian Middle School 26 32 Crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing on 8th St at Meridian Middle School. 2020 2020 2021 Project to be built in 2021. and Capital High School Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing of Meridian Rd at/near Settlers Park entrance and Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion Meridian Rd Pedestrian Crossings(Settlers Park 27 34 Meridian,north of Ustick Sundance Subdivision micropath. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed into future IFYWP updates. Entrance/Sundance Sub Micropath) Not Not 28 35 Chinden Blvd,east of Ten Mile Rd Complete sidewalks on Chinden Blvd,east of Ten Mile Rd Not Programmed Programmed Programmed ACHD to share request with ITD. Chinden Blvd,EO Ten Mile Rd Locust Grove Rd and Time Zone Dr Pedestrian 29 36 Crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing of Locust Grove Rd at Time Zone Dr 2019 I 2020-2021 I 2022 Project to be built in 2022. Locust Grove Rd,Victory Rd/Overland Ra Not Not To be evaluated and prioritized for possible inclusion 30 37 Taormina Drive at Maesaia Way Install sidewalk on south side of Taormina Drive near Maesaia Way. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed into future IFYWP updates. Taormina Or at Maesaia Way Not Not 31 38 lWoodbridge Neighborhood Bike Study Study the connectivity and bikeability of the Woodbridge neighborhood. Not Programmed Programmed Programme ACHD to evaluate as part of future budgeting efforts. Woodbridge Neighborhood Bike Study Comp Plan related. Not Not installation. Crossing activity is caused by parent drop WatertowerSt and Rebound School Pedestrian 32 42 lWatertower St at Rebound School Install a painted crosswalk on Watertower St at Rebound School Not Programmed Programmed Programmed off. Crossing WASD request Not Not ACHD Traffic believes current signage is adequate. No 33 43 Linder Rd,Chateau Dr/Barbara Morgan STEM Way finding signage on Linder. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed additional signage recommended. Linder Rd,Chateau Or/Barber Morgan STEM WASD request Not Not 34 44 St.Ignatius School Pedestrian Signal Pedestrian signal on Meridian Road at Producer Not Programmed Programmed Programmed Scoped in summer 2019.Final report pending. Meridian Rd and Producer Dr School request 35 NEW Bridgetower Pedestrian Signal Pedestrian signal on Ustick Road at Bridgetower(Towerbridge?)Drive. Pedestrian connection (sidewalk) between Barbara Drive in Fairview Terrace Park to E. 36 NEW Fairview Terrace to Chief Joseph Willowbrook Drive and Chief Joseph Elementary on Chateau Drive Gaps on Amity need to be filled for 37 NEW Amity,Eagle to Hillsdale Pedestrian improvements on Amity to the YMCA and City Park, access to destinations. Complete sidewalk on both sides of West 02nd,between the Union Pacific Railroad and Broadway Not Not Sidewalk scoped "No Go" in 2015. Agencies to 38 12 West 02nd St,UPRR/Broadway Ave Ave to address parking concerns in this area Not Programmed Programmed Programmed coordinate if other solutions identified. West 02nd,UPRR/Broadway Ave Not ultimate configuration;need 39 13 Locust Grove Rd,Paradise Ln/Grand Canyon Dr Asphalt path on the east side of Locust Grove Rd to connect with an existing path to the school I Completed Completed Completed Construction completed in 2010. Locust Grove Rd,Paradise Ln/Grand Canyon Di concrete. Not Not east side. ACHD to reevaluate if existing sidewalk does 40 19 Kentucky Ridge Way,Riodosa Dr/Victory Rd Sidewalk on the west side of Kentucky Ridge Way,between Victory and Riodosa. Not Programmed Programmed Programmed not meet needs in area. Kentucky Ridge Way,Riodosa Or/Victory Rd Scoped "No Go" in 2015. This section has connectivity Not Not already on the south side and the original requestor no 41 26 State Ave,East 2nd St/Cathy Ln Sidewalk repair.Requested by land owner in this area Not Programmed Programmed Programmed longer owns the property. State Ave,2nd St/Cathy Ln Nola Rd and Crossroads Middle School Pedestrian Not Not Scoped"No Go"in 2018 as issues are caused by drop-off Nola Rd and Crossroads Middle School Pedestrian 42 39 Crossing Install a painted crosswalk on Nola Rd at Crossroads Middle School Not Programmed Programmed Programmed activities.Encourage school to work with parents. Crossing Not Not Scoped "No Go" in 2018. Sidewalk on east side to be 43 40 Nola Rd,south of Pine Ave Middle School Construct sidewalk on the east side of Nola Rd from Pine Ave to Crossroads Not Programmed Programmed Programmed built through development. Nola Rd,Pine Ave/Crossroads Middle School Eagle Rd Amity Rd r Vert...,oa(Eagle oa Zaldi. Widen Eagle Rd to S lanes with cufla,gutter-,sidewaiif and Hike lanes in" ,�o,dvm^t"•• ,•with the 2016 g n.r � &IR 2015 2830-2020 2023 Project to be built 202 Eagle Rd Amity D.I/I/:,..,." Remove;roadway project. Widen"Rele Rd to S iaaes vAt4 a gutteF,sidewalk-,aad bike lases in,A669FEIRAGe Y&4 the 2816 f ID PFej et: el ides ade of the I I..:,...D....K:..RRi' ,ad,. and L..:.J..,.M13- •f!1'19•f!1'1 O D.,.:,...4 to he h��:It:..'1n'1n I:...d,..0,.1 C.,...I.I:..0,.1/D:..,.A..,, 9 ,9�e 2029 2920 Remove;in CN Not- N<A- !;rhnnnnl Distfiet rebuilt snide , " Aft t�fe self side 41 GaFItG y W Gist St r McFldian oa COMI..,GA Sidewalk, the,; .th : gf QrIt,..,n..,,a.,....W 01 St St AREI nn,..:.1 AR Da nl . � 4 4resolving «t: Gariten n., 01 .c./nn .: D Complete 33 2928 NA 2020 PFejeet to..,.built in 2020 &-sing ]Remove Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 361 of 366 C-/WE IDIAN-- ITEM SHEET Ommr Council Agenda Item -4.E. Presenter: Treg Bernt Estimated Time for Presentation: 5 minutes Title of Item - City Council: Discussion Regarding Council Members Designated to Serve as Contact for City Areas Discussion regarding Council Members designations to CityAreas Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 362 of 366 �E IDIAN^ ITEM SHEET IDAHO Council Agenda Item -4.F. Presenter: Treg Bernt Estimated Time for Presentation: 2 minutes Title of Item - Resolution No. 20-2189: A Resolution Approving City Council President's Appointments of City Council Members to Serve as Contact for Respective City Areas Resolution approving Council Members designated to City Areas A ATTACHMENTS: Descrii)tiol Lpload Reso approving Council Members to City Areas Resolution 3/2/2020 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 363 of 366 CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 20-2189 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, HOAGLUN, PERREAULT, STRADER A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN APPROVING CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT'S APPOINTMENTS OF CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO SERVE AS CONTACT FOR RESPECTIVE CITY AREAS, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, in order to facilitate timely public service, there are designated five City areas, and at the City Council meeting on March 10, 2020, City Council President Treg Bernt did delegate to each City Council member primary responsibility for responding to citizen inquiries originating from that City area, as set forth in Exhibits A and B hereto; WHEREAS, by this resolution, the City Council of the City of Meridian seeks to effectuate and memorialize these appointments; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section 1. That the City Council members appointed by City Council President Bernt to serve as contact persons for the respective City areas, as set forth in Exhibits A and B hereto, shall have primary responsibility for responding to citizen inquiries originating from those respective City areas. Section 2. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this loth day of March, 2020. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this IOth day of March, 2020. APPROVED: Mayor Robert E. Simison ATTEST: By: Chris Johnson, City Clerk RESOLUTION DESIGNATING CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AS CONTACT FOR CITY AREAS PAGE I OF 3 EXHIBIT A C ITY C OUNCIL M EMBER C ITY A REA D ESIGNATIONS Seat Council Member City Area Designation 1 Liz Strader 2 lstrader@meridiancity.org c: 208-546-9501 2 Joe Borton 3 jborton@meridiancity.org h: 208-288-2630 c: 208-870-3764 3 Brad Hoaglun 1 bhoaglun@meridiancity.org c: 208-870-8237 4 Treg Bernt tbernt@meridiancity.org o: 208-489-0544 c: 208-409-7400 5 Jessica Perreault 4 jperreault@meridiancity.org c: 208-489-0541 6 Luke Cavener 5 lcavener@meridiancity.org c: 208-695-4536 R ESOLUTION D ESIGNATING C ITY C OUNCIL M EMBERS AS C ONTACT FOR C ITY A REAS P AGE 2 OF 3 EXHIBIT B: CITY AREAS s�se 7aar vi 14a4 7406 2'a� ibf0 2,818 2 747E 4,98a •'�..� f4f3 'w 2 346 ia12 � r 741fi 9zs �.�•.! �,.I �� 2,p44 ca- w. 4,526 V 14 2a91 !�q�,afi8 1687 m 1.358 8,8Z2 1 2 i �€ 2DD3 2aa4 200fi 1419 2007 2oaa. -u'� ;2D09 2orG LC 2,990 _ 4,635. 5.273 2011 2,767 r sso2 2203 7.817 3,88E 3 .2,798 I !3,239 i 42413 7,754 0 o C`2S 2.50'! -- l L. I F 4 - 2101 - 7102� } 2103 1 2705 � 2406 t L •�• _ f,369 r 2,697 2106 ' Ix1Di 3A 37 2.131 --. 2 ! u 3 1 — ! 5 211, 4 ��� L\ 1,917�. —r, 1 t. 2510j 2 � 1.,7�, _ 1 Council 'r Precinct Number ----- tspt ; 1 Precinct Population* 'Based on 2010 US Census. 221Z 2,25a Impact wee 2zua Vat3ng Precincts 3,g7g 1 nt EZZ=ZZ=:=rw. Date:f2N2r2Q13 RESOLUTION DESIGNATING CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AS CONTACT FOR CITY AREAS PAGE 3 OF 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda March 10,2020— Page 366 of 366