Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2019-05-21
C I T Y C OUNCI L R EGU L A R M EET I NG AGENDA C ity Council Chamber s 33 E ast B roadway Avenue M er idian, I daho Tuesday, M ay 21, 2019 at 6:00 P M (Called to Order 6:03pm) 1. Roll-C all Attendance X A nne L ittle R oberts X J oe Borton O Ty P almer X Treg B ernt X Genesis Milam X L uke Cavener (6:15pm – 8:25pm) X Mayor Tammy de Weerd 2. P ledge of Allegiance 3. Community Invocation by T im P usey of Valley S hepher d C hur ch of the Nazarene 4. Adoption of Agenda – Adopted 5. Announcements 6. F uture M eeting Topics - Public F orum (Up to 30 M inutes M aximum) Signing up prior to the start of the meeting is required. This time is reserved for the public to address thei r elected officials regarding matters of general interest or concern of public matters and is not specific to an active land use/development application. By law, no decisions can be made on topics presented under this public comment section, other than the City Council may request that the topic be added to a future meeting agenda for a more detailed discussion or action. The Mayor may also direct staff to further assi st you i n resolving the matter following the meeting. 7. P roclamation A. B etter Hear ing M onth 8. Consent Agenda [Action Item] - Approved A. Approve M inutes of M ay 7, 2019 C ity C ouncil Regular M eeting B. S helbur ne S ubdivision No. 2 S anitar y S ewer E asement C. F inal P lat for B lakeslee C ommons No. 2 (H-2019-0050) by Bungalows M eridian, LLC, L ocated on the S outh side of E. Ustick Rd. between E agle Rd. and L ocust G rove Rd. D. F inal P lat for M ovado S ubdivision No. 5 (H-2019-0039) by M ovado D evelopment, LLC, L ocated approximately 1/2 mile south of E . O verland Rd., West of S . M ovado Way E. F inal P lat for M ovado S ubdivision No. 6 (H-2019-0051) by E vans D evelopment, LLC, L ocated 1/2 mile S outh of E. O verland Rd, West of S . C loverdale Rd. F. F inal P lat for S ilverstone Apartments (H-2019-0054) by D ave E vans Construction, L ocated at 4107 E. O ver land Rd. G. F inal O rder for C aven Ridge E states West No. 2 (H-2019-0048) by L asher E nter pr ises, L ocated on the E ast side of S . M eridian Rd., appr oximately 1/4 mile S outh of E . Victor y Rd. H. F inal Order for E ast Ridge No. 1 (H-2019-0041) by D evco D evelopment, LLC, L ocated on the Nor th side of E . L ake Hazel Rd., West of S . E agle Rd. I. F indings of F act, C onclusions of L aw for K nighthill C enter S ubdivision (H-2019-0043) by J RW C onstr uction, L ocated at 6343 N. L inder Rd. J. F indings of F act, C onclusions of L aw for S tapleton S ubdivision (H- 2018-0129) by S tapleton, LLC , L ocated at the S W cor ner of S . M eridian Rd./S H 69 and W. Harris S t. K. F ir e D epar tment: M emorandum of Understanding between I AF F L ocal 4627 and the C ity of M eridian L. L icense and I ndemnity Agr eement with Coastline E quipment for M ini Heavy E quipment Rodeo M. P rogram Year 2018 C ommunity D evelopment B lock G rant Agr eement with the P ublic Works D epar tment for a Not-to-E xceed Amount of $50,000 N. P rogram Year 2018 C ommunity D evelopment B lock G rant Amendment with T he J esse T ree of Idaho for a Not-to-E xceed Amount of $25,000 O. D evelopment Agreement for I C O M P ar king E xpansion (H-2019- 0019) with Idaho C ollege of O steopathic M edicine, LLC (O wner/D eveloper ), L ocated at 885 S. L ocust G r ove Rd. P. Awar d of C hange O r der No. 8 to T he E wing C ompany, Inc. for the “WRRF Headworks E xpansion” P roject for a Not-To-E xceed amount of $292,860.38. Q. P rofessional S er vices Agr eement for Artwork for T raffic B ox Community Ar t P r oject with Brian S chreiner for Not-to-E xceed $300 R. Resolution No. 19-2141: A Resolution O f T he M ayor And T he C ity Council O f T he C ity O f M eridian Authorizing T he C ity Cler k To D estr oy C ertain S emi-P er manent And Tempor ar y Recor ds Of T he City Of M er idian; And P roviding An E ffective D ate. S. Resolution No. 19-2142: A Resolution Revising T he P ublic Wor ks D esign Standards F or T he C ity O f M eridian. T. AP I nvoices for P ayment - 05/10/19 - $154,300.44 U. AP I nvoices for P ayment - 05/15/19 S pecial - $2,075,535.01 V. AP I nvoices for P ayment - 05/22/19 - $1,709,577.61 9. Items M oved F rom T he C onsent Agenda [Action Item] 10. Community I tems/Presentations A. Ada C ounty Highway Distr ict: C hip S eal P resentation 11. Action I tems Land Use Public Hearing Process: After the Public Hearing is opened the staff report will be presented by the assigned City planner. Following Staff's report the applicant has up to 15 minutes to present their application. Each member of the public may provide testimony up to 3 minutes or if they are representing a larger group, such as a Homeowners Association, they are allowed 10 minutes. The applicant is then allowed 10 additional minutes to respond to the public's comments. No additional public testimony is taken once the public hearing is closed. The City Counci l may move to continue the item for additional information or vote to approve or deny the i tem with or without changes as presented. The Mayor is not a member of the Ci ty Council and pursuant to Idaho Code does not vote on public hearing i tems, unless to break a tie vote. A. M eridian D air y and S tock S how Request for C ost S har e for Annual D airy D ays P arade - Approved B. F inal P lat for K eep Subdivision (H-2019-0053) by J arron L angston, L ocated at the S W C orner of S. E agle Rd and E. L ake Hazel Rd. – Continued to May 28, 2019 C. P ublic Hearing for Orchard C r eek P ump House (H-2019-0052) by O A+D, L ocated on the nor th side of L ake Hazel Rd., E ast of S. E agle Rd. - Approved 1. R equest: Variance f rom the dimensional standards of the R -8 district listed in UD C Table 11-2A -6 to allow f or the construction of a 350 square f oot structure within the required setbacks and street landscape buffer. D. P ublic Hearing for Pollard S ubdivision (H-2019-0021) by B righton Investments, LLC , L ocated NE C orner of S H-16 and W. C hinden Blvd. - Approved 1. R equest: A nnexation and Z oning of 77.33 acres of land with R -8 (21.95 ac res) and C-G (55.38 acres) zoning districts; and, 2. R equest: a P reliminary P lat consisting of 75 building lots, 7 common lots and 4 other lots on 71.3 acres of land in the R -8 and Meridian City Council May 21, 2019. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:03 p.m., Tuesday, May 21, 2019, by Mayor Tammy de Weerd. Members Present: Tammy de Weerd, Joe Borton, Luke Cavener, Genesis Milam, Anne Little Roberts and Treg Bernt. Members Absent: Ty Palmer. Also present: Chris Johnson, Bill Nary, Bill Parsons, Sonya Allen, Kevin Holmes, Kyle Radek, Berle Stokes, Joe Bongiorno and Dean Willis. Item 1: Roll-call Attendance: Roll call. X__ Anne Little Roberts X _ _Joe Borton ___ Ty Palmer X__ Treg Bernt __X___Genesis Milam __X___Lucas Cavener __X__ Mayor Tammy de Weerd De Weerd: Well, good evening. I would like to welcome all of you to our Meridian City Council meeting. This is our regular meeting that is, for the record, Tuesday, May 21st. It's 6:03. We will start with roll call attendance, Mr. Clerk. Item 2: Pledge of Allegiance De Weerd: Item No. 2 is the Pledge of Allegiance. If you will all rise and join us in the pledge to our flag. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) Item 3: Community Invocation by Tim Pusey of Valley Shepherd Church of the Nazarene De Weerd: Item 3 is our community invocation and tonight we will be led by Pastor Pusey. Thank you for joining us. If you will all join in the community invocation or take this as an opportunity of a moment of reflection. Pusey: Father, we want to thank you tonight for this city, the City of Meridian, and the many ways in which you have blessed us. We are very very very grateful, Lord, and we are very blessed. We thank you, too, for those who serve our community and for our leaders and as they gather tonight to deal with decisions that have to be made in behalf of our community I pray your wisdom for them. We recognize that the responsibility they have is great. We also acknowledge that your Word says that if we seek wisdom from you you have promised to grant it to us. So, Lord, give to them wisdom tonight. I'm also Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 5 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 2 of 48 mindful that in -- whenever we gather with people in this kind of a -- in any kind of context that all of us as individuals bring our own challenges and hurdles and even heartaches with us and I pray that you would speak peace to our hearts and our minds tonight. Lord, help us to be mindful of the needs of people all around us and teach us to love and care for the needy as you have, in Christ's name we pray. Amen. Item 4: Adoption of Agenda De Weerd: Thank you for those reminders. Item No. 4 is adoption of the agenda. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: There are no changes to the agenda, so I would move -- I move that we adopt the agenda as published. Little Roberts: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as published. All those in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Item 5: Announcements De Weerd: Item 5 is community announcements. We do have a couple of things coming up. For those who don't know this, we do have a Main Street Market here in downtown Meridian. It runs every Saturday from 9:00 to 2:00. We would love to invite you to come on down to the City Hall Plaza and surrounding area to enjoy the produce of many of our vendors and some of their talents as well. We also have -- we are closed on Memorial Day, but we do have a ceremony, a Memorial Day, ceremony out at Kleiner Park at our Rock Of Honor. It starts at 11:00 a.m. It's generally a very moving and touching ceremony. It's rather short. So, we would love to have you come join in on honoring those that we have lost on Memorial Day. With that said, I have no further announcements. Council, any anything to bring up? Item 6: Future Meeting Topics - Public Forum (Up to 30 Minutes Maximum) De Weerd: Okay. Item 6 is future meeting topics. It's a public forum. Mr. Clerk, did we have any signups? Johnson: We have two. First we have Denise LaFever. De Weerd: Hi, Denise. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 6 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 3 of 48 LaFever: Hi. My name is Denise LaFever. I'm at 6706 North Salvia Way, Meridian, Idaho. De Weerd: Thank you. LaFever: I'm here today to talk about what happened at the state -- on Stapleton process, H-2018-0129, during the sign-in process. The development community was allowed to read in the names that were on the sign-up, either for or against and read that into record and some of the members weren't present. We would like that same opportunity as residents. I -- I can testify here sitting in the back row of these meetings time and time again this is a long, laborious, frustrating process for residents and one thing that we can do as a city is allow people to go online, since it's available online nowadays, I would like to see the form modified to say resident and be able to put the address and say for or against to allow them that opportunity to weigh in on how they feel about it. You might even consider a really brief comment. But at least to weigh in if they are for or against. I think it's in the best interest of the city to have our residents voice how they feel about a project and not necessarily have to give up times with their families or make those hard decisions to show up or go to your child's soccer game or whatever else you have going on in your life. So, I would like to see you make that change and make that fair to our residents. So, I'm just asking for your consideration on that. De Weerd: Thank you, Denise. Thank you for bringing that up. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Denise, can't we -- can't you do that now with a sign-up and check on a land use application? LaFever: We don't -- you don't read it in. At one point in time when we used to hand write those you used to read in for or against, would you like to testify. When we went electronic you failed to do that any longer and -- and I think this is even better now that it's online, because it allows our folks more of an opportunity to have a say in what's going on. Borton: So -- Madam Mayor? If I understand you correctly, the request is that we publicly read the for or against? LaFever: Yes. Borton: Okay. We are capturing the data, we are just not communicating it necessarily -- LaFever: Yes. Borton: -- as effectively as we could? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 7 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 4 of 48 LaFever: Yes. And I would like to even go one step further adding the residence box and communicate -- communicating that out to our public and our citizens that that's available for an option to weigh in and let your voice be heard, so -- Borton: Understand. Bernt: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bernt. Bernt: Mr. Clerk, is that something that we can change? Is that something we can -- De Weerd: Well, the -- the signup aspect is already there and he could add the checkbox on the resident. I think that the comment is more on procedural in terms of reading each name into the record and indicating for or against. LaFever: I think a good start is least put -- to know that it's a resident and, you know, the comments, if that's something we decide to do at a later date, at least start with going back through knowing if they are a resident, for or against, and if they would like to testify. I would like to see that process go forward. Bernt: Madam Mayor, just -- just to confirm. What you're saying is you just -- would it suffice if it was just a checkbox for or against, resident -- LaFever: Uh-huh. Bernt: -- would that be -- De Weerd: It's already on there. It's just the resident piece that she's asking to be added to the form. LaFever: And I think that would be -- De Weerd: And I think Mr. Coles when he started he took it if you wanted to testify that would be the name that we call forward and they would come up and testify. So, we will -- we will talk about that with Mr. Clerk and our City Council President. LaFever: Thank you. De Weerd: Absolutely. Thank you. Okay. Johnson: Madam Mayor, next you have -- Zoe Nelson and Oliver Brian. De Weerd: Good evening. Thank you for joining us. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 8 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 5 of 48 Brian: Oliver Brian. 1901 Southeast 3rd Way. Nelson: And I'm Zoe Nelson. De Weerd: Thank you. Nelson: All right. So, we are here today on behalf of Meridian Medical Arts Charter High School and the students there have been discussing putting a citywide band so that you cannot smoke in a motor vehicle while in the presence of a minor and this would include traditional tobaccos, products, vapes and all other forms of electronic cigarettes. Brian: The main reason we are making this proposed is because of not only the physical health effects, but also the mental health effects of the minors that are in presence of, you know, these activities occurring. Not only are the carcinogens in the products harmful, but also on the mental health as they can't decide, you know, what really happens in the presence of their guardians and so that can always affect a minor as we are growing up to watch, you know, the guardians or whoever is around them in the motor vehicle doing those kinds of things and as we know Idaho is like mentally -- mental health is underserved and that could really benefit a lot of mental health for minors as they are growing up. Nelson: And it was also brought to my attention that this could possibly assist the police in doing their job because this would give them another reason, if they had suspicion in anything to see someone and that could help the system. De Weerd: Well, thank you. I -- I think at this point we take your idea and we see if there is interest to pursuing the idea further, to have it publicized on a future agenda and, then, we would love to have your complete and whole argument, because it sounds like you have already put a lot of thought and research into this and that would be the time to really give us the -- the information that -- that you have discovered. So, we will -- we will talk about this at our agenda setting meeting and Mr. Clerk will follow up with you. Is that information on the signup sheet? Johnson: It is not, but I will check in before they leave. De Weerd: Okay. Awesome. Nelson: Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you so much for joining us tonight. And I believe those are the two that signed up under Item No. 6. So -- Mr. Borton. Borton: Sorry to interrupt. I talked briefly to these students. I appreciate you coming down here and -- however, I don't know if it was Councilman Cavener or where this started, but this future meeting topic concept of an open forum, this is exactly what it's trying to capture. In particular when our youth come up with an idea that is of interest to Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 9 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 6 of 48 you and now you have got a little more homework to do to bring it back. However this got started, I appreciate you utilizing this process to open our eyes to new ideas, so thank you. De Weerd: Well -- and I would say we love to hear from our -- our teen members of our community and usually your ideas come without the baggage that a lot of our adult ideas come with. So, we appreciate you joining us this evening and we will follow up with you. Thank you. Item 7: Proclamation A. Better Hearing Month De Weerd: Okay. Item 7 is a proclamation for Better Hearing Month and I will move to the podium. I believe that someone is here to accept this proclamation. Is Susan Elcox here? Susan, if you will join me at the podium. Okay. I will read the proclamation and, then, I will see if Susan has some comments she would like to share afterwards. Whereas hearing healthcare professionals in the City of Meridian, Idaho, observe and celebrate Better Hearing Month each year during the month of May and whereas the City of Meridian, Idaho, recognizes and values the efforts of all who work to eliminate or minimize the isolating effects of communication disorders and one in five families affected by them and whereas the hearing loss is the third most common health problem in the United States and more than half of the people with hearing loss are younger than age 65 and whereas our citizens who have overcome communication disabilities through the services of hearing care professionals are now able to lead independent, productive, and fulfilling lives and whereas the City of Meridian is proud and honored to have hearing care professionals offering quality education and healthcare services to its citizens to help them hear well, live well. Therefore, I, Mayor Tammy de Weerd, hereby proclaim May 2019 as Better Hearing Month in the City of Meridian and encourage all our citizens to recognize the achievements of hearing care professionals in improving the quality of life for people with communication disorders. And I'm sure that all of us know someone that has had a hearing loss. I know my dad did and before he died he was almost distance from the conversations and such that went on around him because he couldn't hear with the background noise and -- and it does isolate citizens and the people that we care the most about. So, thank you for being here, Susan, and allowing me to read the proclamation honoring your organization and the Better Hearing Month. So, here you go. Elcox: Thank you. I just wanted to state that the reason that we do these proclamations every year is because, as Mayor de Weerd mentioned, many people have -- suffer with hearing loss as it stated in the proclamation, 50 percent are under the age of 65. So, we have a lot of young citizens that have hearing loss as well. The important thing for everyone to understand about hearing loss is that there has been a study that was conducted about, oh, ten years or so ago, that showed that there was a correlation between your health and other health consequences -- between hearing loss and other health consequences, specifically dementia. I like to make sure that all of our citizens are aware that untreated hearing loss does lead you at greater risk of developing dementia, Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 10 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 7 of 48 two to five times greater at risk. Two times being with -- with a mild loss, which is a person who doesn't know even -- may not even be aware that they have a hearing loss and haven't accepted the fact that they have a hearing loss. Five times if they have a severe loss. So, it goes up the scale as your hearing loss gets worse. There are -- often there are many benefits to treating your hearing loss. I would like to just mention a few. One is better relationships with friends and family, because you can carry on conversations to their fullest. You have more fun going out and doing things. More enjoyment just watching TV. So, simple things. Better health, because your brain gets exercised again and better memory and cognition. So, for those in the audience who may have seen the ads on TV about taking a pill, a supplement to improve your memory, the studies are showing that simply treating hearing loss performs much better than these nutraceuticals you can take. Thanks. Item 8: Consent Agenda [Action Item] A. Approve Minutes of May 7, 2019 City Council Regular Meeting B. Shelburne Subdivision No. 2 Sanitary Sewer Easement C. Final Plat for Blakeslee Commons No. 2 (H-2019-0050) by Bungalows Meridian, LLC, Located on the South side of E. Ustick Rd. between Eagle Rd. and Locust Grove Rd. D. Final Plat for Movado Subdivision No. 5 (H-2019-0039) by Movado Development, LLC, Located approximately 112 mile south of E. Overland Rd., West of S. Movado Way E. Final Plat for Movado Subdivision No. 6 (H-2019-0051) by Evans Development, LLC, Located 112 mile South of E. Overland Rd, West of S. Cloverdale Rd. F. Final Plat for Silverstone Apartments (H-2019-0054) by Dave Evans Construction, Located at 4107 E. Overland Rd. G. Final Order for Caven Ridge Estates West No. 2 (H-2019-0048) by Lasher Enterprises, Located on the East side of S. Meridian Rd., approximately 114 mile South of E. Victory Rd. H. Final Order for East Ridge No. 1 (H-2019-0041) by Devco Development, LLC, Located on the North side of E. Lake Hazel Rd., West of S. Eagle Rd. I. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Knighthill Center Subdivision (H-2019-0043) by JRW Construction, Located at 6343 N. Linder Rd. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 11 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 8 of 48 J. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Stapleton Subdivision (H-2018-0129) by Stapleton, LLC, Located at the SW corner of S. Meridian Rd./ SH 69 and W. Harris St. K. Fire Department: Memorandum of Understanding between IAFF Local 4627 and the City of Meridian L. License and Indemnity Agreement with Coastline Equipment for Mini Heavy Equipment Rodeo M. Program Year 2018 Community Development Block Grant Agreement with the Public Works Department for a Not -to - Exceed Amount of $50, 000 N. Program Year 2018 Community Development Block Grant Amendment with The Jesse Tree of Idaho for a Not -to -Exceed Amount of $25,000 0. Development Agreement for ICOM Parking Expansion (H- 2019- 0019) with Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, LLC Owner/Developer), Located at 885 S. Locust Grove Rd. P. Award of Change Order No. 8 to The Ewing Company, Inc. for the WRRF Headworks Expansion" Project for a Not-To-Exceed amount of $292,860.38. Q. Professional Services Agreement for Artwork for Traffic Box Community Art Project with Brian Schreiner for Not -to -Exceed 300 R. Resolution No. 19- 2141: A Resolution Of The Mayor And The City Council Of The City Of Meridian Authorizing The City Clerk To Destroy Certain Semi -Permanent And Temporary Records Of The S. Resolution No. 19-2142: A Resolution Revising The Public Works Design Standards For The City Of Meridian. T. AP Invoices for Payment - 05/ 10/ 19 - $ 154,300.44 U. AP Invoices for Payment - 05/ 15/ 19 Special - $2, 075,535.01 V. AP Invoices for Payment - 05/22/ 19 - $ 1, 709, 577.61 De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Item No. 8 is our Consent Agenda. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 12 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 9 of 48 Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: There were no changes to the Consent Agenda as published, so I move that we approve the Consent Agenda, for the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Bernt, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 9: Items Moved From The Consent Agenda [Action Item ] De Weerd: There were no items moved from the Consent Agenda. Item 10: Community Items/Presentations A. Ada County Highway District: Chip Seal Presentation De Weerd: So, we will move to Item 10-A, which is a presentation from Ada County Highway District about the beloved program. Chip seal. Thank you for joining us. Nicholson: Thank you, Madam Mayor. For the record, Tim Nicholson, Ada County Highway District Deputy Director. Our address is 3775 Adam Street in Garden City. And it's a pleasure to be in front of you again, once a year at least, unless we have a whole bunch of snow, which we haven't had for a couple years, which we are all thankful for. De Weerd: Yes, we are. Nicholson: Yes. So, I will talk to you about the 2019 chip seal season that ACHD is about ready to embark on. I would like to start with a brief video if I could. So, I think it's all on the -- on the computer itself. Thank you. Well, maybe we won't do the video, but it was really cool. De Weerd: I will have to believe you on that. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 13 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 10 of 48 Nicholson: Yeah. Well, it shows kind of the old way of doing things and now the new -- new way of doing things. So, trust me, it was really good and there was good songs with it and everything, so -- De Weerd: I think that's the best argument you can have, Tim, is bring one, hope it doesn't work and, then, say what it -- okay. Nicholson: Justin will vouch for me. It was spectacular. He got to see it today. So, we will just go back over here to this. So, why do we chip seal? The reason that we chip seal I think is evident in this shark fin curve that you can see in front of you. As you can see over time, over roughly 13 to 14 years, the life cycle of asphalt pavement goes down dramatically after about year ten. So, ACHD's preventative maintenance concept is to do the chip seal roughly every six years on the arterial and collector roadways and by doing this you can see that the cost of our chip seal operation is about 22 cents per square foot. When compared to a mill and overlay about seven times more expensive and reconstruction, which is about 33, 34 times more expensive. So, there is a huge benefit to the taxpayers and the citizens to keep the roads in very good condition using the chip seal process and it can ultimately extend the life of the pavement significantly when compared to doing nothing or even a mill and overlay where you can see -- you have that huge investment and it really doesn't extend the life of your pavement terribly much longer. The other reasons why we chip seal -- our asphalt oxidizes and becomes brittle and ultimately develops cracks. So, in doing the chip seal process it provides a new wearing surface for the public that increases the friction between the road surface and the tires, keeping drivers safer during inclement weather, as well as helps waterproof and seal up those cracks in the road, preventing further degradation of the base and, ultimately, the entire road. This is a map of our six chip sealed zones. The seventh zone you see is in downtown Boise where we don't do chip sealing, we do other preventative maintenance treatments for those roads specifically. But as you're well aware, we are going to be working in zone two this year and due to the fact that we had an extravagant amount of lane miles to cover, we are splitting zone two up into two years. You're more than aware of the amount of growth that's happening in your city here and zone two has grown tremendously since we have been -- been in this area the last time. So, there was too many lane miles for our crews to adequately complete this year, so we are going to split zone two up between 2019 and 2020. We will get into that here a little bit further with a more detailed map. The current goal, like I said, is to do every arterial and every collector roadway in the zone every six years, along with half the residentials. So, the residentials are going to get completed every 12 years on average. As far as dollars and matrix go, we are looking at spending about seven million dollars. This is ACHD's largest maintenance activity that we do on a yearly basis. It involves about 25,000 team hours over 45 days. We are planning to do about 424 lane miles this year, which is about an average year for us. The target for us is about 450 miles a year. So, that involves, again, 6,800 tons of liquid asphalt and roughly 47,000 tons of chips. This is an overview of our chip sealing train or process. As you can see out in front we have a lead vehicle and we have traffic move -- moved around. You can see on the right side of the picture that the far most right lane has already been chip sealed and is open to traffic. Leading up to this we had already swept the road. You can see the distributor truck in the front of the train Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 14 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 11 of 48 spraying down the hot oil, followed by the chip spreader. Usually a train of dump trucks, anywhere between ten to 15 dump trucks, followed up by three rollers or four rollers, depending on how many we need for that particular roadway and that's -- it's a fast moving, very dynamic process and if you have ever gotten a chance to go out and see it, which I would encourage any of you if you would like to come out and be a part and either ride on the chipper or run the distributor truck, you're more than welcome to do that, just give me a call and we would be happy to arrange that. We will be right in front of City Hall at some point. So, they will be close to home. But it's an orchestrated dance, essentially, is what it is, to -- to move the traffic along, to keep the train moving and keep the production up. This is a picture of the fog seal operation. So, after we place the chips, the road, again, is immediately opened up the traffic. We will come back through a couple days later, sweep the bolt chips out of there, do a final sweep another two or three days later and, then, do the fog seal and what this allows is it allows our traffic team a blank canvas to do new line painting and markings on the street and also if they want to change any of the lane configurations or add a bike lane, it gives us that opportunity to be able to do that as well. So, this process is not just -- we wind this thing up in May and start in -- in late May and early June, it's a very involved process that starts back in December and January with our maintainers get -- going over all the equipment, inspecting things, repairing our equipment, making sure it's all ready to go and, then, there is a lot of other outreach that goes along with it and as you can see we have spoken with the Ada County Sheriff's Office dispatch team, we have already mailed out postcards to everybody in the affected chip seal area. We had a presentation with the Meridian and Boise police departments, shared it with our commission about a week ago and here with you all tonight to share with the Meridian City Council. After that the show begins on the 28th, the day after Memorial Day. We will do our refresher training with all of our crews and it will be our soft start date, assuming that the weather cooperates with us and if it's cool, like it's been these past couple days, then, we are probably going to have to postpone that a little bit until we get some warmer temperatures, but we plan to start with what's called an auto seal, which is a little different than a chip seal and it's used more on rural roads. As you can see, we will be out on South Cole Road doing that and, then, our other group -- our Adams team is going to be in the Eagle Island State Park doing a little joint venture with Idaho Parks and Recreation Department. We are going to chip seal the entrance road. What this allows us to do is to calibrate our equipment, make sure that everything is working properly, get the crews trained up in areas that aren't so full of traffic and really get going the following week. We won't be chip sealing at all during the July 4 holiday week. This allows us time to go through our equipment and do some more maintenance and evaluate the process and see where things are going well, see what we need to tweak. Plus it also keeps us out of the way for everybody's plans for travel over the holidays and -- and their barbecues and everything else that's going on. So, we plan to be done in late August and have a chip seal victory party with our team members the middle of September. Again, communication is a big part of this operation. Like I said, we have sent postcards out to everybody. We will be posting daily updates on our web page. We will update the Ada County Sheriff's Office and RITA is our internal program that's roadwork in the area. It's also on our website. We have an interactive public facing map on our website that will show what we have completed, what's in progress and -- and where we are kind of headed next, so you can kind of follow along through that. And, of Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 15 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 12 of 48 course, our communications folks will be posting a lot on our various social media outlets. Again, this is a map of the area that we are going to be doing. The green area on the left- hand side of the map is our Cloverdale crew. The pink area, red area on the right side of the map is Adams operation, so -- and we are pretty heavy on the residential side this year. We are doing all the residential roads in this area this year. So, with that, I would stand for any questions or comments. De Weerd: Thank you, Tim. Council, any questions? That was a very thorough presentation. We appreciate that and it is a long, onerous program. Do you coordinate with our public safety team on what sections -- how you start rolling it out? Nicholson: You know, I don't know if we specifically spoke with them. I would be happy to do that, though. We -- the plan is to start in the northwest quadrants of both maps and, then, kind of work easterly and, then, southerly from there and end up in kind of the southeast corner of both those maps. De Weerd: I think it is helpful and you have a contact over with Lieutenant Stokes. Nicholson: Be happy to do so. Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you. We appreciate you joining us. Nicholson: Thank you. Item 11: Action Items A. Meridian Dairy and Stock Show Request for Cost Share for Annual Dairy Days Parade De Weerd: Okay. Item 11 is under our Action Items and tonight we will first start with 11- A, which is a presentation from our Meridian Dairy and Stock Show. We just call it the Meridian Dairy Show Board. Thank you for joining us. And this is about the upcoming Dairy Days parade and activities. Thank you for joining us. Mattison: Thank you. Jerry Mattison. 1892 West Hendrix Court in Meridian. I'm secretary-treasurer of the Meridian Dairy and Stock Shows. Bruijn: And Hans Bruijn, president, Meridian Dairy Board. And, first of all, Madam Mayor, I want to thank you for your support all these years. It's going to be strange when we come back next year and somebody else be sitting in your seat. De Weerd: It will be strange, not weird right? Sorry, that -- Bruijn: This year the big chance is that after many years of suggestions from Council, Meridian Police, ACHD, we have moved the parade from Friday to Saturday. It will be Saturday, June 22nd at 6:00 p.m. The reason for the evening parade is Saturday morning Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 16 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 13 of 48 and early afternoon is when our -- we have our dairy -- cattle and dairy goat show, which is one of our main reasons why we put on Meridian Dairy Days. So, we have to make sure that's all done before we can start a parade and I think everybody is very excited about seeing the parade move into Saturday. However, it does change a little bit of the cost, since we have gone from a work day to a weekend. As you're well aware of Specialty Construction will do all our traffic control and their quote has gone up quite a bit, because of a Saturday parade. This year the quote was about 5,900 dollars. In addition, we have also taken the advice from Meridian police in crowd control and trying to have caution tape along the entire route of the parade along Main Street for safety reasons, which also, you know, adds to the -- to the cost. Did you have anything that you -- Mattison: That is not included in the -- I believe you guys have accounts with a copy of the bid from Specialty? De Weerd: Yes. Mattison: And the caution tape is not included in there. Bruijn: So, basically, what we do is -- what we have done in the past is request support of the City of Meridian to cover the cost of Specialty Construction. Is there any questions? De Weerd: Council, any questions? So, Hans, I'm excited that it's moved to Saturday and I think your community and public are really appreciative that you moved it to Saturday, because, of course, the timing of the parade was always when everyone was trying to go home from work and that was kind of a recipe for a lot of frustrated drivers. So, this is -- this is good news. So, you're asking for the fifty-eight nine -- 5,898.75, in addition -- Mattison: I don't know how much Specially charges for that tape and I don't know how many feet we need of it, but I understand it's relatively expensive through Specially. I don't know how to put that politely. Bruijn: And in addition there may be a few more man hours on the -- for the flaggers. They will try to stay a little later so we can get our cleanup crew to follow -- follow the parade to make sure that we leave the streets in better shape than when we started. De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Council, any questions? Bernt: Madam Mayor? De Weerd Mr. Bernt. Bernt: Just a question for the Police Department. Officer Stokes. A reason why the additional cost for the tape this year as opposed to last year. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 17 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 14 of 48 Stokes: I may not be the best expert on this, but, typically, with parades it's the challenge of keeping the pedestrians that are on the sidewalk -- to keep them on the sidewalk and not in the parade route and I don't think we have candy thrown and that kind of thing as much as we used to. I do think it's a -- it's a reasonable safety measure. As far as caution tape goes, I don't know the exact cost, but like our police line tape that everybody's familiar with, it's relatively inexpensive and I don't know if we are talking about the same thing, like a plastic line, but that should not be a significant cost. It should be a couple of hundred dollars I would guess. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Quick look on the old Google machine shows $3.79 for a thousand foot roll. Mattison: I have looked it up on Amazon and it's not cheap, but I understand that Specialty marks it up a little bit. De Weerd: Well, maybe we need to order through Amazon. Bruijn: We -- we did try to sell -- find a sponsor, you know, maybe put their name on -- on the caution tape. However, the expense of that is way past anybody's budget. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Maybe I didn't track it correctly. Is the caution tape a request that we have put upon you or you're asking us to do or -- De Weerd: We have put upon them and they are asking us to cover it. Mattison: We are asking you to pay for it. Yeah. It was -- you know, in the last couple of years we haven't had any of that tape up and down the road and there has been quite an issue with people coming out and I know McCall, when they do their winter carnival parade, they use the caution tape and they said it works great and I just think it's worth a try. You get -- the safety is -- is more important than the cost I think. De Weerd: And particular where it starts to split and -- and that's always been kind of a conflict where that tape is essential for sure. I'm not sure it's going to keep the kids out of the street, because not all candy makes it to the curb. Mattison: No. I was jokingly saying I feel bad if a piece of caution tape works better than me standing there trying to keep kids back, but I hope it does. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 18 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 15 of 48 De Weerd: We will -- we will see. We will look forward to the report next year. Council, any other questions? Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: I assume there is an action that we need to take on this. I know we don't necessarily have a budget amendment, but I'm -- I'm comfortable with doing what we did I think last year, which was to approve a not to exceed amount based on the estimate that we have here and it sounds like some -- some additional unanticipated costs. Nary: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: Madam Mayor, I did check with Finance before today's meeting to see if they already have budgeted some funds towards this expense and they have budgeted 4,900 dollars based on last year's amount. So, that's already in your budget. So, anything above that would, then, need a budget amendment. But there is at least 4,900 that was already planned in our budget and, then, I did check with the departments and I didn't get a response from police, but I did for Parks and there is some that's already programmed in their budget is the reservation fees for Storey Park that we have traditionally waived That's $964.60 and that's already planned. There is overtime hours that are already programmed into their budget as well. They planned 93 total hours of overtime for that. So, that -- that's already been planned for in the expense. So, it really is the 4,900 and, then, in addition to that. De Weerd: And so those -- those costs are detailed in the memo that Emily provided. Nary: Yeah. De Weerd: And the only -- it sounds like the only thing that has changed is the bid that we received and the addition of the caution tape. Cavener: Oh, Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: I will move that we approve the Meridian Dairy and Stock Show request for cost share for a not to exceed amount of 6,000 dollars and, then, I guess, Madam Mayor, quick -- legal to just bring a budget amendment for the 1,100 bucks? Nary: We can do that. Milam: Second. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 19 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 16 of 48 De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion and a second to authorize up to -- you said 6,000 dollars? Cavener: Correct. De Weerd: Any discussion? Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Bernt, aye. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. De Weerd: So, we will just look for your after event report and we will see how the numbers fall. Mattison: Great. Bruijn: Thank you. B. Final Plat for Keep Subdivision ( H- 2019-0053) by Jarron Langston, Located at the SW Corner of S. Eagle Rd and E. Lake Hazel Rd. De Weerd: Thank you for joining us. Okay. Item 11-B is a final plat for H-2019-0053. This applicant has requested a continuance to May 28. Council, any -- any concerns or do you need any background information on them? If not, I would entertain a motion to continue Item 11-B. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: I move that we continue Item 11-B, H-2019-0053 to May 28th. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to continue 11-B to May 28th. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. C. Public Hearing for Orchard Creek Pump House ( H- 2019-0052) by OA+D, Located on the north side of Lake Hazel Rd., East of S. Eagle Rd. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 20 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 17 of 48 1. Request: Variance from the dimensional standards of the R- 8 district listed in UDC Table 11- 2A-6 to allow for the construction of a 350 square foot structure within the required setbacks and street landscape buffer. De Weerd: 11-C is a public hearing for H-2019-0052. I will open this public hearing and for those that are new to this process, we have staff give an overview of the application and, then, the applicant will come forward, discuss the project details. They have ten minutes to do this and this is timed. It's timed -- the timer is on the podium on the screen, so you can track the amount of time where you're at. After the applicant presents a project, we will take public testimony. Public testimony is a three minute timeframe for each of those that have signed up to provide testimony. Then the applicant has an opportunity to stand for final comments, to answer any questions raised during the testimony, and to provide any additional information to Council. At that point Council will ask questions of staff, applicant, or those that provided testimony and, then, close the public hearing. So, with that I will turn this over to staff to -- for their comments on Item 11-C. Holmes: Madam Mayor, Council Members, thank you. The item before you is the Orchard Creek Pump House variance application. The site consists of a common lot on 2.2 acres of land, zoned R-8, located just north of East Lake Hazel Road and east of South Eagle Road. In 2014 this property was annexed and preliminary platted as Hill Century Farm. In 2018 that section was final platted as Bicentennial Farms No. 1 with 47 single family homes and 11 common lots on 19.29 acres of land that is currently being marketed under the name Orchard Creek Subdivision. So, the applicant is requesting a variance to deviate from the dimensional standards of the R-8 district to allow for the construction of a 350 square foot structure within the required setbacks and street landscape buffer. The proposed structure will serve three purposes, primarily a pump house for the subdivision irrigation equipment. It will also be a covered structure for a dog park entrance and it will also be a subdivision entryway feature. On the corner of the property installed the well and irrigation equipment at this location without the approval of the city, so that approved construction documents for Bicentennial Farms No. 1 do show this facility farther to the north. In any case, an order for Idaho Power to supply power to the irrigation pumps, they do require them to be enclosed in a permanent structure. This proposed building is encroaching approximately eight feet into the 35 foot landscape buffer here on Lake Hazel Road, which is designated as an entryway corridor. You can see in this exhibit the site is constrained by a number of features, including multiple events. We have ACHD and the City of Meridian water easements as well and, you know, the Ten Mile Creek on the west and, then, Lake Hazel Road to the south. So, staff does believe that there is sufficient space to place this structure in a location outside these areas. For example, just shift it slightly to the west. However, it is staff's understanding that this is not feasible at this time. As the irrigation facility is currently providing water to the development. In addition, the applicant would have to further subdivide the property to place the irrigation facility on a separate dedicated lot as required by code. So, staff is supportive of the multi-use nature of the facility and finds that as a whole it is -- would be a benefit to the residents of this subdivision. In addition, the appearance of the building Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 21 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 18 of 48 emulates other design features found in the subdivision and is more visually attractive and interesting than the majority of pump houses built. But based on the required findings in the staff report, staff does recommend denial of the variance request. Staff will stand for any questions. De Weerd: Thank you. Council, any questions? Thank you, Kevin. Is the applicant here? Good evening. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Garrett: Brian Garrett. 210 North 6th Street, Boise, Idaho. De Weerd: Thank you. Garrett: So, as staff -- staff mentioned, there is a couple of small corrections. The pump was actually placed by the development prior to the final plat being approved. It was not necessarily the previous owner, however, it was -- it was prior to roads and much other infrastructure going in and there were some clarifications made as well that Kevin made. But, yeah, we are -- we are proposing to take what is necessary utility, an existing pump and existing pump pad and beautify it and make it into an amenity for the -- for the community or a development. The well -- or the pump station, it was placed prior to completion of the final plat. It's regrettable that the placement does -- is in the setback. However, it is not in the vision triangle. There is no public safety or welfare concerns. Moving the pump would be at great expense and we don't believe that moving it -- sliding the pump over would necessarily be beneficial to the community or public safety or anything else like that, it would just be a marginal push of something that was unfortunately placed where it is. Staff has been -- and as mentioned that they are in support of the overall idea of utilizing this existing structure as a minority for the community and we would ask that Council approve the variance and allow us to create this amenity for Orchard Creek. De Weerd: Thank you, Brian. Council, any questions? Okay. Thank you. Mr. Clerk, are there any signups? Johnson: Madam Mayor, there were no sign-in on this project. De Weerd: Okay. So, Council, any additional information needed from staff or our applicant's representative? Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: It doesn't sound like there is any, so I will move that we close the public hearing on Item 11-C, H-2019-0052. Milam: Second. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 22 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 19 of 48 De Weerd: I have a motion and a second, but I would like to ask the applicant if there were any final comments he wanted to make. Borton: Motion withdrawn. De Weerd: Thank you. Garrett: In -- Century Farms has a -- an amenity that is also about a quarter mile up Eagle Road from this development. It's within -- it -- we haven't taken a tape measure to it, but it's much closer to the public road than this is. There is existing pump houses on -- in other developments that are also very close to the road. We do not feel that this is out of line with those locations, even though it wasn't necessarily set intentionally to violate the setback. De Weerd: Thank you. Garrett: Thank you. De Weerd: If there are no further questions, I would entertain a motion to close the public hearing. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Move that we close the public hearing on Item 11-C. Milam: Second. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing on Item 11-C. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton: Borton: Kevin, welcome. I think the analysis is spot on, but I think it highlights something that we have struggled with a little bit more recently with our variance and three prongs versus two. I'm supportive of the request -- the variance request. I think the -- the findings with regards to the undue hardship on the characteristics of this site with regards to the relocation of the structure elsewhere on the property wouldn't be feasible. The irrigation facilities currently supply water to the development. There is not additional land area to Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 23 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 20 of 48 place the irrigation facility -- do to site specific undue hardships on this site that by granting the variance doesn't necessity -- necessarily provide a special privilege. I think it's those unique characteristics that warrant granting it and you're finding, which I agree with as well, but it doesn't -- approving it wouldn't be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. It makes it appropriate in this context under these facts, to grant this specific variance and, then, we are working on the three prongs of our variance in trying to clarify that for applicants going forward that there is really effectively two prongs to what we have to provide to grant a variance and we haven't yet done that. So, I still think the intent of that is supported by the facts, so I'm supportive of the variance request. De Weerd: Thank you, Mr. Borton. Any other comments? Do I have a motion? Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Based upon that reasoning I move that we approve the various request in H- 2019-0052. Milam: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve the variance for H-2019-0052. If there are no discussions, Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Bernt, aye. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. D. Public Hearing for Pollard Subdivision (H-2019-0021) by Brighton Investments, LLC, Located NE Corner of SH -16 and W. Chinden Blvd. 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 77. 33 acres of land with R-8 21.95 acres) and C- 2. Request: a Preliminary Plat consisting of 75 building lots, 7 common lots and 4 other lots on 71.3 acres of land in the R- 8 and C-G zoning Districts De Weerd: Item 11-D is a public hearing for H-2019-0021. I will open this public hearing with staff comments. Bernt: Madam Mayor? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 24 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 21 of 48 De Weerd: Mr. Bernt. Brent: Before we continue, I -- I'm in -- I'm in the flooring business and I do a little bit of business with the applicant, along with another builder, who follows them and their -- and their builder team that build in different subdivisions and so I -- I directly could potentially benefit from this -- from this application if it is approved and so, therefore, I would need to recuse myself from this conversation. De Weerd: Okay. Thank you, Mr. Bernt. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: If -- I apologize to everyone here. Can we just take a quick five minute break before we jump into this? I want to make sure we have got plenty of time. It's been brought to my attention maybe we may have a time concern for another Council Member tonight and I want to make sure that we are all on the same page in light of that recusal from Mr. Bernt. If we could have maybe a five minute recess to make sure that we are going to be fine to hear this thing in its entirety tonight before we begin. I think it's important for the people that are here that there is going to be a change with a Council Member having to leave that would prevent a quorum, that we are pretty direct with that. De Weerd: Okay. We will reconvene at five after 7:00. (Recess: 7:00 p.m. to 7:06 p.m.) De Weerd: Okay. I will go ahead and call this meeting back to order. Thank you. We do have a Council Member that has to leave at 8:00 and so we do have a hard stop at 8:00 o'clock, so I will go ahead and ask for staff comments at this time. Allen: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. The applications before you are a request for annexation and zoning and a preliminary plat. This site consists of 71.3 acres of land. It's zoned RUT in Ada county and is located on the north side of West Chinden Boulevard and State Highway 20-26 west of Black Cat Road. The Comprehensive Plan future land use map designation on this property -- there is three different designations. Medium density residential. If you look at the map on your left there, which is the yellow area, it is three to eight units per acre. Mixed use interchange, which is the lower left area, the hatched area, and mixed use community, which is the brown area. The applicant is requesting annexation and zoning of 77.33 acres of land with R-8 zoning, which is 21.95 acres and C-G zoning, which is 55.38 acres, consistent with the associated future land use map designations. A conceptual site plan was submitted as shown. The proposed development will be anchored by a medical campus consisting of a medical office building, which will eventually include a surgical center, emergency department and a hospital. There are four professional office buildings proposed and is down here in the southeast corner. Two flex space buildings and those Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 25 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 22 of 48 are kind of central to the development on the east end, one of which is anticipated to house a police substation. Retail with a convenience store, multi-tenant retail office, a health club and conventional single family residential homes, single family residential independent living homes and assisted living facility along the north boundary. A preliminary plat is proposed consisting of 75 building lots, seven common lots, and four other lots, consisting of two private streets, one common driveway and one future right of way lot on 71.3 acres of land. The plat is proposed to develop in three phases as shown on the phasing plan in the lower right. One full access is proposed via Levi Lane. I will just flip back to that plan here. Levi is a collector street from State Highway 20-26. A traffic signal with an emergency vehicle preemption will be required at the Levi-State Highway 20-26 intersection. An east-west collector street, Waverton Drive, will provide access from the east via Black Cat Road through Fairbourne Subdivision and it will intersect with Levi Lane in accord with the master street map and extend to the west to Pollard Lane providing access to the Franklin Sensors property and the rural residential properties to the north on the rim and will serve as a backage road providing access to the properties fronting the state highway. This street will replace the east-west street that lies approximately 530 feet to the south of their proposed location that currently aligns with the driveway to the Franklin Sensors building. This neighbor is against the proposed location -- relocation of the street to the north, although ACHD has approved their proposed location contingent upon vacation and exchange of existing right of way. Two stub streets are proposed to the north boundary for access to the resident -- rural residential properties from Old School Lane. Pollard Lane abutting the west boundary the site north and the existing driveway to Franklin Sensors property is required to be improved as half of a 40 foot street section with curb, gutter and sidewalk. A 35 foot wide street buffer is required along State Highway 20-26 with a ten foot wide multi-use pathway. A 25 foot wide landscape buffer to adjoining residential uses is required along the east boundary of the commercial portion of the site. Qualified open space and site amenities are proposed within the residential portion of the development in accord with UDC standards. A pedestrian circulation plan was submitted as shown that provides for pedestrian interconnectivity within the site and to the main building entrances in the commercial development. Public plaza areas are also depicted on the plan as required in mixed use designated areas. Staff recommends more central connected plaza and outdoor gathering areas are planned adjacent to buildings with development of each commercial area. Those depicted on the site plan do not qualify toward the minimum requirements. Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the hospital as shown and medical office buildings, flex-tech buildings and the assisted living facility and single family residential attached and detached homes. The Commission did recommend approval of this project to the Council tonight. Madam Mayor, would you like me to go through the summary from the Commission hearing? It's rather lengthy. I'm not sure if you want to spend the time tonight or not. It is contained in the staff report that you should all have had for your review. De Weerd: I think Council's good. If they have questions and they can -- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 26 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 23 of 48 Allen: Thank you. And, then, I will just add written testimony has been received from Keith McGregor and David Dorrough from Franklin Sensors since the Commission hearing. Thank you, Madam Mayor. De Weerd: Okay. Thank you, Sonya. Any questions from Council at this point? Borton: Madam Mayor, one quick on. De Weerd: Okay. Borton: Sonya, in the staff report there is reference to the two roads stubbing to the north, concern that they were intended to be private streets, wanting them to be public. Is that -- Allen: That is correct. Uh-huh. Borton: Is that still an issue or is that resolved? Allen: The city is requiring them to be public streets, as is ACHD, so no issue. Borton: Okay. Allen: They agreed to that. De Weerd: I guess it depends on who you ask. Okay. Is the applicant here this evening? Good evening. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Wardle: Good evening, Mayor, Council Members. Jon Wardle with Brighton. 2929 West Navigator Road in Meridian. 83642. De Weerd: Thank you. Wardle: Thank you for your time tonight. I will be brief given the time constraints we have tonight. Just want to note that the ACHD commission did approve this project on April 10th and there was unanimous commission approval sent to you for recommendation for approval on April 18th. It seems like your system just shut down. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Just to be clear for the applicant and the public, the concept of a hard stop for 8:00 o'clock, which happens every now and then, doesn't -- doesn't mean that there has to be a decision by 8:00 o'clock. There may or may not be depending what questions come up and what testimony there is, but if it necessitates continuing it, that -- that's what Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 27 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 24 of 48 would occur. It's not a -- no one should feel forced to shorten any comments or presentation. Wardle: Let me just open that back up again, Sonya. Maybe I can -- let's try if there -- well, let me just talk a little bit about the project while we are waiting for that to come back up. When we started looking at the project, Pollard Subdivision Central Valley, we looked at the overall plans that the city had. There was a strong desire for a backage road system north of Chinden and not putting all those trips that may be able to go a different direction. So, when we started looking at the project we looked at the way that it fit in the context of the overall plan the city had for the north Meridian area and this gives you a demonstration of what that idea was, that there would be connections north of Chinden Boulevard. In this case with the construction of Waverton we will be connecting to Levi, which would be a signalized intersection. To Black Cat, which also would be a signalized intersection and over to Tree Farm and this provides east-west mobility without connecting -- or without having to get onto Chinden Boulevard, which was a strong desire that the city had. We have worked a lot with the neighbors to the north. We didn't initiate this planning process haphazardly, but we had been talking with them for some time and how we would develop the buffers between us, them to the north, and how those connections would be. To answer the question regarding private versus public roads, we are proposing public roads connecting to the north. Those property owners may not be ready to develop at this time and so like most public roads there will be signs up to say in the future this road will be extended and that will be at their choice when that connection would happen. But until that happens Old School Road, which services those homes, will continue to exist and will be their access and can be until they make a decision on that. There were some issues or questions that were raised that we addressed at Planning and Zoning commission regarding quasi-public open spaces. We do agree with staff that they do need to be more centrally located between buildings and when we come through the CZC, DR process for those buildings there are a number of locations different than what we proposed that could be those quasi areas to satisfy that question and we are ready to do that in the CZC DR process. One of the other issues was the setback or buffering from future Fairbourne. We had worked with that property owner. We have also worked with the staff. Originally we had proposed a setback of 90 feet with a three story building. In consultation with that property owner and with staff, we have rotated that building -- it's moved a hundred to 160 feet, so 70 feet more. We do have a 25 foot landscape buffer on our side and it's our understanding of the Fairbourne Estates Subdivision will also have a 23 foot landscape buffer on their side and so there is a very sizable landscape area between those two projects. We will be providing a future lift station -- sewer lift station, which is part of the city's plans at this location, which allows this area to develop per the city's plans and provide services not only to the future development of the north when that occurs, but also to the rest of Franklin Sensors to the west and there is an out parcel, which eventually will lose all of its access with the widening of 20-21 -- 20-26 and we will accommodate the future cross-access for that as well and there was another item that -- at the city Planning and Zoning Commission about buffering of flex office space adjacent to that roadway. We will also pick that detail up in the CZC DR approval. However, we have increased the room for additional buffering to create a berm, plus a fence, so that any doors would be sufficiently screened from that public roadway. There has -- one of Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 28 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 25 of 48 the items that was raised at the ACHD meeting and also at P&Z was access to the property owner to the west. We have had a variety of conversations -- when I say we, BVA, who is -- will be developing the hospital site here -- has been discussing that access with Franklin Sensors, along with and allowing for by license agreement access through that site eventually. Tom Peterson, BVA, has met with them, has discussed that with them and we continue to state that we will work with them to provide that access through license agreement. So, there will be some discussion about that, but I just wanted to put that out there that we -- we are committed to doing that and BVA will continue that processes as they bring their plans forward for that hospital and the development of that project. One of the other items on -- for your consideration this evening is in the city code there is a requirement that a hospital take direct access to an arterial. There are arterials that are specifically planned through the city, through COMPASS, through ACHD. Levi Lane, although it is a collector road, is being built as a five lane road connecting directly to the only point of access that will be allowed on 20-26. So, functionally, Levi Lane will act as an arterial, although it's designated as a collector and this gets to a signalized access, which will have the preemptive control on it as well. We have spent a lot of time planning this project. This is a -- it takes into consideration a lot of things. First was the -- the transportation planning, the connecting east to west of that desired backage road system. We are also extending sewer, water, and other public utilities to an area that currently doesn't have them and installing a future lift station for the sewer. The project in and of itself is -- is unique, because we have a variety of mixed uses, which is the designation for this area that comply within the context of the comp plan. Hospital. Office. Flex office. Residential. Even public services such as a police substation and connecting the pedestrian connection east-west in a corridor which is also very important. So, we have looked at all these and have put together a plan for you that we feel does address the concept in the context of a mixed use community at this location. Finally, as we -- I will stand for any questions. We do request your approval for this project in that we have looked at the context of the Comprehensive Plan, we are providing a mix of uses here, both for employment, needed services in an area that currently doesn't have these services. Connectivity both for automobiles and pedestrians and bicyclists and extension of public services to an area which currently does not have those. We request your approval of Pollard Subdivision, also known as Central Valley Plaza and I stand for any questions you might have this evening. De Weerd: Thank you. Council, any questions? Okay. Thank you. Mr. Clerk, if you will read those names who have signed up to testify. Johnson: First we have of Robin Hayes. De Weerd: Thank you for joining us. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Hayes: My name is Robin Hayes. We live at 7100 North Pollard Lane, Meridian, Idaho. 83646. We actually get into our property -- we have two parcels off of Old School Lane that amount to 11 acres and so we come around from Pollard onto Old School Lane and, then, access our piece of property to the north. I just wanted to make a comment that Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 29 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 26 of 48 Brighton has very -- been very good to work with. We have been working with them probably six, seven years on the development of this approximately 80 acres there. It's changed its composition over the years and what it was going to be and what -- what was going to happen, but they have been in constant contact with us. Every time we had a question or a suggestion or an idea or could you do this or how will we do that, they have responded and have I think addressed our needs very well. In general we don't really like to see what's happening in Ada county and the City of Meridian, but it is what it is. But we do support this project. I don't know if you can see on the map where our property is. We are kind of right smack dab in the middle of it. So, it really does impact us. But we have had full and easy access to them, writing letters, notes, calling, text messaging, e- mails and they have been very good in responding to us immediately. I don't know how to let you know where -- De Weerd: You need to pull it back. Hayes: Yes. De Weerd: There you go. Hayes: Yeah. How do I show you on here? Oh. Allen: You can -- Johnson: You have control of the mouse. Hayes: Oh. Okay. Great. Okay. And this is one parcel right here and this is the other parcel right here. It's a total of 11 acres. We have been there for 35 years, raised three kids, a lot of horses, a lot of great dogs and have really loved it. So, we are supporting the project and look forward to continuing to work with Brighton on any of the questions. They are doing a privacy fence for us along here and a berm and have really worked with us and are going to stub in utilities for us for the future. De Weerd: Thank you, Robin. And we appreciate you joining us. Council, any questions for Mrs. Hayes? Thank you. Hayes: Thank you. Johnson: Madam Mayor. Next is Tamela Paxman. Jay Paxman. De Weerd: So, it sounds like there is a spokesperson and we will see who all is giving their minutes and he will have up to ten. Johnson: Owen Barnes. David Dorrough. Dorrough: I would like to request that I -- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 30 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 27 of 48 De Weerd: Good evening. Dorrough: I'm David Dorrough. I would like to request if I could use three extra minutes from Jay Paxman, who just yielded his minutes, if that's okay. De Weerd: No. I'm sorry. You will have three minutes. Dorrough: Three minutes? De Weerd: Yeah. Dorrough: I will talk really really fast. De Weerd: Oh, you are the -- Dorrough: I was going to talk really really faster. There is a lot of stuff that we -- De Weerd: You will have ten minutes, then, to provide your testimony. Dorrough: Okay. De Weerd: We -- if -- that's not how it works. Everyone says I will give you mine. Dorrough: Can he come up and stand next to me while we talk together? De Weerd: No. Dorrough: Can I talk while he -- De Weerd: You will have ten minutes as the spokesperson. Dorrough: Okay. This is going to be hard. Well, we will see what we can do. This is our time to -- this is our vision, would be an upscale -- instead of just the west of the project. We will have upscale office buildings is our vision. We want -- that's kind of what we are -- you know, this is our first building. It has very -- very big windows. We made it very nice. We made very big drive aisles. I can't do this. But this is -- when we -- when we got that -- when we got the property this was the access that we had. This is how we understood. We understood we were a landlocked piece of land. We understood that this was the land -- this was -- this was a piece of land that was -- an access road that was there. We understood this when we got ahold of the contact -- got a hold of the contact, we understood exactly what was going to happen and we went and got zoned for this piece of land -- got zoned accordingly. We lined up our building with -- we lined up our complex with this piece of the land. Shortly after we got our zoning approved -- came back and wanted to change the road. We were all lined up with the road, we were trying to make it perfect, we can make an asset to the community and got a new road location and we went back and we went through zoning again a second time, so we could Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 31 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 28 of 48 be lined up. We got through that zoning and, then, Brighton changed it a third time and so we -- we went back and we wanted to do it right, we went back a third time, so we could do it right. It's kind of frustrating, because now we have built everything -- the roads been built, it's all been understood that it's a deeded land and now we have a fourth location and this is where it is -- where the green one is. You kind of see there is a history of what we have gone through. This is kind of what happens to our access. We thought we would have the red access and now we have this -- kind of this jumbled -- actually, we have to go up and around. It's not -- it's not a nice -- nice access. It does depreciate the value of land and when you talk to -- access is everything. This happens everywhere -- around a lot of places in Meridian -- Meridian. There is a lot of places that have this sort of thing happen. This is one near -- this is where I live. It's -- you have -- you have -- you have an access road, everyone builds -- I believe is a public road, everyone understands public roads are there to stay. We understood that. If this -- if someone would have come along and said I want to put a hypothetical hospital right there in the middle of your road you would have people all the way out here complaining about that, because they believed and understood it was a public road and we understand public roads stay and I would hope that that happened. You got to say, well, let's try and figure out a way to not have to upset a public road that someone has built around and trusted. So, I like to like stand back and like look at this project and say, okay, if we -- this project has kind of evolved, there has been lots of -- lots of iterations since last September when it got published in the paper and we are going to take this site and try and -- and try and -- start from scratch, knowing that's a public road, these are the buildings you want to put in, you want to put in a hospital cluster and there somewhere you want to put it all together, obviously to do it, but the hostel on the other side, you don't have to upset anyone's pub -- anyone's road never want to be happy. So, that's I think it's worth considering that very, very seriously because it's -- and they would apply it, offer a lot of -- lot of benefits. You group the medical doctors together, you could get together it would be a much better design of the city, much better flow if we would, you would have a right hand turn into your hospital, if I'm having a stroke or heart attack I definitely want that right-hand turn. It would be a better way of doing it. Our conclusion is this really -- we -- we count on this road. We are landlocked. We depended on this road and we strongly appeal that -- you know, that -- this is a road the Brighton picked. It's their -- it's their location. They picked the road. They built it. We just designed around it. We are landlocked now. We would strongly encourage you not to approve this application, because I think it sets a terrible precedence and personally I don't think it makes a great city and -- Jacob, do you want to come up next? Yeah. If you don't mind. Johnson: Madam Mayor, if I may, there were four additional signed up after Mr. Dorrough and he was representing, I believe, Ms. Paxman, Mr. Paxman and Mr. Barnes. So, it is your decision how you want to proceed, but there were additional -- De Weerd: Okay. Now -- so you had -- you as the spokesperson had a total of ten minutes. You have six minutes left. I'm sorry, I can't have a conversation with someone in the audience. So, Mr. Dorrough, can you tell me -- you don't need the full ten minutes. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 32 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 29 of 48 Dorrough: We are going to expect a few more than three minutes, without me taking all ten minutes. You know, he can use a few more than three if we divide the extra six minutes among a few other people. De Weerd: I -- our process is that we give a spokesperson ten minutes -- Dorrough: Okay. De Weerd: -- to speak for a group. Any other testimony that's accepted has a three minute limit. Dorrough: Because I know in the Planning and Zoning they let people -- everyone got to borrow minutes. I use a few of your minutes -- I mean a lot of people -- everyone was very common. De Weerd: We do follow our process. It's -- it -- it is the process that has been adopted for years and -- and that is -- Dorrough: Okay. De Weerd: -- the process that I offer you tonight. Dorrough: Okay. Three more minutes. Shall I take your presentation? Yeah, if we do it fast. De Weerd: Okay. So, Mr. Dorrough -- or Dorrough -- Dorrough: Yes. De Weerd: -- you are -- are done with your comments? Is that what I understand? Dorrough: You want to come talk to -- I don't -- go ahead, Jacob. Why don't you take the rest of my presentation. Why don't you finish mine. Can he finish my six minutes? Can he be the spokesperson? At least one person will get their -- De Weerd: He can finish your six minutes, but we need to -- to continue this and -- you have six minutes remaining and -- and this will be the rest of your six minutes. Is that my understanding? M.Dorrough: Can we just ask a question. We are real new to the procedure -- could we just ask for clarification. We are a little new to this process and the other commissions we have been before had different processes. We were -- De Weerd: Well, they -- they do have the same process, but I think you caught them unawareness and I think they gave you leeway that -- we can't set a precedence, we need to maintain our record and this is the process that we follow. I announced it at the Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 33 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 30 of 48 beginning of the meeting that you each have three minutes. If you have a spokesperson, people yield their time to that spokesperson, that allows ten minutes and that ten minutes was offered and so -- now we need to move this meeting along. M.Dorrough: We can't -- we can't present -- like I had three minutes. I can't do my three minutes, because he started this as the spokesman and -- De Weerd: You will have your three minutes. M.Dorrough: Okay. De Weerd: He yielded. We had the three people before Mr. Dorrough that yielded their time as the spokesperson. Okay. Mr. Clerk, who is next on the list? Johnson: Jacob Barrett. De Weerd: Good evening. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Barrett: Yes. My name is Jacob Barrett. Address is 6675 North Pollard Lane, Meridian. So, I have a couple slides here for you. Just want to take a look. Let's see. Sorry. So, I was born and raised in Meridian and I currently work next door to the Central Valley Plaza proposed site. I wanted to talk about some potential legal zoning questions that I have come across looking at this application and because of them I'm currently opposed to the proposal as it's currently presented, but I think if there were some changes made and some -- the proper processes followed, that this proposal could go through. The question I came across in looking at the future land use map -- obviously, there is the three designations that were talked about before. The MDR, MU-I and MU-C. The two bottom ones with the commercial area being the mixed use parts of the development, but when I looked at the future land use map designation, the -- which, according to the Comprehensive Plan, it says that the future land use map dictates the types of zoning that are envisioned for the particular pieces of land. The zonings that are -- show up for mixed use interchange in this area are the L-O and ME and the zoning that shows up for the mixed use community are the zonings highlighted there and what I have noticed is conspicuously absent from this is the zoning that Brighton is requesting here, the C-G zoning. It kind of looks like they are trying to sneak in a Comprehensive Plan change through the backdoor of this application and apparently nobody's flagged this legal issue. The future land use map designations, obviously, in the Comprehensive -- Comprehensive Plan state that according to Idaho Code the zoning districts should be in accordance with the adopted plans and the city website states in their public information that requesting land use changes in the City of Meridian is a big deal, because it impacts, of course, everybody and can change a lot of things and I'm not here saying that you can't change the future land use map in order to accommodate the development, but nowhere in the project application, nowhere in the public notices have I seen anything about this application attempting to alter the land use map, it's just been presented as a simple Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 34 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 31 of 48 annexation and zoning application and kind of looks like they are trying to get that in without getting the public scrutiny that might come with having a Comprehensive Plan or future land use map change. So, I would say that until the legal and proper notice has been given to the public that this is actually looking at a future land use map change, that that is what is actually happening here that should be held up until that has happened. De Weerd: Thank you. Barrett: Thank you. De Weerd: Council, any questions? Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: I'm going to ask legal a question and, then, you a question and I will come back to -- De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Borton: The question raised is to can this application proceed as presented without the corresponding comp plan amendment to go along with it in light of the existing comp plan designation and the requested zoning I think is the question. Can legally proceed. So, we can answer that one and the question to you, sir, while he's chewing on that is if this had the -- the comp plan application that you believe needs to go with it before us today, would you be supportive of the application? Barrett: I think that if -- if it was properly amended and the public was able to know that the amendment was happening and could comment on it then -- then that would put it in a different light. Borton: And, Madam Mayor, that's the million dollar question back to you. I was just curious if assuming that the requisite application that you believe had to come along with it was here today, would you, then, be supportive of the application? Barrett: I -- I would -- I would not have these questions with -- on that. Yeah. So -- De Weerd: Mr. Nary, I guess there was a question to you. Nary: Certainly. Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Councilman Borton, so I'm reading the staff report. The staff's analysis is that it is consistent with the -- the Comprehensive Plan. Obviously, ultimately, that's the Council's call on whether you agree with that analysis, but that is contained within your staff report is a variety of areas where the mixed use -- and I think there is also a comment in here -- I think on this slide that's in front of you that talks about emergency services and such. So, whether or not that Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 35 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 32 of 48 hospital being there qualifies in that is, again, a decision of the Council. But your staff report from the Planning Department feels it is consistent. There is a request for annexation. The zoning that's being requested is requested to be done through a development agreement. So, it is really your decision of whether or not you agree with the staff's comment. But there is quite a bit of analysis and why they believe it is consistent. Borton: Thanks. De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. And thank you. Barrett: Thank you. Johnson: Madam Mayor, next is Michelle Dorrough. M.Dorrough: Again I apologize for the confusion. So, I will try to be really quick. So -- De Weerd: Michelle, if you will state your name and address for the record. M.Dorrough: Michelle Dorrough. 3044 West Sugar Berry Drive, Eagle, Idaho. 83616. In 2013 the Martime Group signed an agreement with -- sorry. ITT signed an agreement with Martime Group to -- how do I do this? I don't know how to do this. I don't know how to turn this slide -- to change the -- the construction of the road because of the Highway 16 that was being built and, anyway, the agreement we sent to you it stated that certain qualifications had to be met and there was a deadline of 2016 it had to attain to complete construction and ACHD approval by that -- that time. A payment was made in the amount of 463,000 -- a hundred thousand dollars for the purchase of the land and, then, administrative settlement, in addition to 356,000 dollars for the construction of the road and it was currently built in November of 2016. ACHD also showed that they believed it to be a permanent road and a public road by putting a green sign for North Pollard Lane and -- as opposed to a blue sign, which indicates a private road. It's well understood that public roads are not uprooted without compelling public reasons. In addition Brighton requested that we remove -- move the original right of way to a different location, because they did think it was going to be permanent, otherwise, why would they have moved it. We had -- we rezoned three different times to match up with Brighton's changes. So, they -- they thought it was going to be permanent, otherwise, they wouldn't have done that. On June 15, 2016, they sent us e-mail referring to it as a permanent road and it confirmed that it would be deeded to ACHD and in November 2016 they said that -- when we complained they said it should work well with our proposed business park. At the recent ACHD hearing there was some misinformation that they -- they claimed that it was always -- in the rebuttal that it was always intended to be a temporary road and because -- we discovered after that that the paperwork was misfiled with ITD and ACHD confirmed that it is in the correct location and the road was built in the correct location. The applicant proposes that because of paperwork that it is now a public error, but paperwork errors do not dilute their obligation. Can I say anything else or not? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 36 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 33 of 48 De Weerd: You can summarize your comments. M.Dorrough: My comment is with receiving over three quarters of a million dollars of taxpayer dollars, that should be considered a permanent road and we relied on it in good faith. We requested it not be approved until they propose a permanent. We use the current in its location or that they treat us like the other neighbors and come up with a compromise. We are the only neighbor who has not been worked with very well. We have had only about two meetings and there has been no written information that's been guaranteed to us just like the other neighbors. So, that is our first thing. De Weerd: Council, any questions for Michelle? Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Michelle. Cavener: Michelle. De Weerd: If we can ask a question. Cavener: Your last comment kind of stuck with me, so I know that there was some pretty significant direction from the Planning and Zoning Commission for the applicant to work with you, but your comment made it sound like that in your opinion that didn't happen. M.Dorrough: We have been trying to contact them since December. Recently after the Planning -- first Planning and Zoning Commission BVA reached out to us and we did have a very pleasant meeting. Last Tuesday we sent them an e-mail and said if they would give us something in writing before tonight, we would recommend this project and we would not oppose it and they did have a -- come and meet with us yesterday and so they wanted to give us something, but they haven't given us something and because of that they have given stuff to all the other neighbors and have worked as they said for five to seven years with them. We have been working with them for about a month. Or we have been trying to, but that isn't the same treatment in my opinion and it is a public road by all aspects. Cavener: Madam Mayor, additional question. Michelle, you will have to help me -- when you say you want something -- M.Dorrough: Well, we want the public road to remain that we paid over 90,000 dollars in rezoning three times, because they kept moving it, because it was supposed to be a permanent road. Thank you. De Weerd: So, what do you mean by rezoning. M.Dorrough: The original easement with our -- they -- it was originally -- they had that the road was connected to Chinden. ACHD required them to move the road for safety to -- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 37 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 34 of 48 De Weerd: Because it was too close to Highway -- M.Dorrough: Yeah. Too close to Highway 16 and then -- so, we originally zoned for -- for where it was set in 2013 and in 2016, after our zoning, Brighton requested to move the easement down, because they thought it was going to be a permanent road and -- and so, then, that was approved. We weren't involved at all in that process. We would have liked to be. And so, then, we rezoned, so we could align with the new alignment and, then, shortly when it -- after when they built it they -- I think there was something that they wanted to remove -- that they might have been required to move it for power poles. Again, nobody talked with us about it and, then, we went through a third of zoning process and totaling over the 90,000 dollars and several months of delay on our project and rent cost as we were waiting to be able to start our project. That alone -- and plus the comments and e-mail and plus the contracts, which were misrepresented to the ACHD commissioners, are all evidence to us that in good faith that road should remain and as David presented, there is a way to do it to where it could work for everyone. De Weerd: So, you were at the Ada County Highway District meeting. M.Dorrough: The recent one. De Weerd: And -- because they really are the ones that set the road infrastructure and those kind of things and they have made a decision on this application -- M.Dorrough: It was a decision based -- based on rebuttal. We -- we had, again, only ten minutes and the applicant had more than the time at the beginning and even in the rebuttal more than the allotted time and in the rebuttal we weren't allowed to respond, but they threw out a new argument that this was always intended to be a temporary road and that there is no legal basis for ACHD to deny them the right to move it and in which case I can understand the commissioners thinking, well, we -- and they even said that, we can't -- we have no legal basis to prevent this and we like Brighton and we don't have anything against them, too. We think they are a great company. We think they build great things. We hope that they succeed tremendously with this project, but we would like to not have a hospital right in front of our grand entrance that we paid a lot of money and time to develop. De Weerd: Thank you. M.Dorrough: Thank you. Johnson: Madam Mayor, we have Keith McGregor. De Weerd: Good evening. McGregor: Good evening. Sorry for talking from the audience. Keith McGregor. 66 -- I work at 6675 North Pollard Lane. I'm in charge of a lot of the truck traffic and in outbound logistics, among a lot of other things I do for Franklin Sensors. I'm here to discuss some Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 38 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 35 of 48 of the negative impacts of the proposed project. So, one of them is it's going to increase potential for injuries due to a lot of left-hand turns being added, being property damage and accidents, lives and stuff like that. We have added a significant amount of pedestrian traffic right next to where they are trying to flow our traffic. As you will notice on Levi Lane they are going to send us up and, then, across right next to all this -- all these senior citizens and it's well known that walking is kind of the main form of exercise for the elderly. Future Meridian Research Park development, we plan on having around 500 employees, plus a few service trucks coming in and out, all making left-hand turns. Now they have to make two extra left-hand turns instead of one and both of those left-hand turns coming to a T intersection, having to check both ways before you turn instead of just one and ahead of you is adding a lot of danger. It's actually well known that -- or even a fact according to NHTSA, our National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, that 22.2 percent of left-hand turns -- or, sorry, pre-crash events happen at left-hand turns versus 1.2 percent happening at right-hand turns. Are we following? I talk really fast. I'm sorry. De Weerd: Yes, we are following. McGregor: Okay. We -- it's also well known that access is the number one factor to determining land value according to Ryan, who is an experienced appraiser and owner of Zack Ryan Appraisal Services. That's his quote. So, obviously, a preferred entrance is a nice direct access off the main road. It's attractive and we knew we wouldn't quite have that, but we did always expect to have direct access. We can see some examples of the paying here for land value. Your first piece of property, obviously, is closest and has the most access is going to be almost a third -- you lose almost a third in value going down to something buried back in a complex. This is Francis Place Professional Park. Another example -- and probably a better example, really, is this light industrial complex. You can see down at the very bottom of the screen it's a turn at least twice to get into this last piece of property and the property value there is $1.95 per square foot versus properties on the other side where they have direct access of being three dollars a square foot. So, we believe this could drop our property value by almost a third just because of the -- just because of the way it's designed and how it's being laid out versus what it could be. Again, another example you will see the more buried property, which doesn't get good direct access, is a third less in value of the other properties around it due to the way that the roads are working. So, we -- and we also talked to a local commercial real estate expert and he specifically said that this negatively affects the value of Meridian Research Park's property. So, in conclusion, we just ask that either we get something in writing from the -- from Brighton that -- that we can agree to as far as an easement that keeps our value in place and it's safe for everybody or if we can leave the road in the current position that would be agreeable to us as well. Just in case you're wondering, we get about three to four trucks a day currently at Franklin Sensors. We make the world's best stud finders. That's what we are doing now. So, we get some big semis and some UPS delivery trucks, too. De Weerd: Thank you, Keith. McGregor: Thank you. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 39 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 36 of 48 De Weerd: Council, any questions? Thank you. Johnson: Madam Mayor, next is Karen Garcia. Garcia: Karen Garcia. 6675 North Pollard Lane. Mayor de Weerd, Council Members, it's a pleasure to be here. I think Michelle did a nice job kind of explaining -- one of the concerns -- one of the big concerns that we have is we feel that as you're making decisions based on recommendation from Planning and Zoning and from ACHD, that in those meetings there were some misrepresentations and because many of those misrepresentations came during the rebuttal we had no chance to speak to them. So, I would like to speak to those -- a couple of those really quickly, so that -- that you are aware of them. One of the myths that they have -- they have said is -- and the reasons why their project should move -- move forward and why it's necessary is that Franklin Sensors can't build anymore, that we didn't go through the needed processes. That is not the case -- that we did go through the Planning and Zoning and that we do have the utilities needed, not only to build one additional -- we have approved for one additional building and we have water and we also have sewer capable for five times more sewer capacity than we are currently using. One of the things they also say is that the road must be torn up, that whether we were to keep it up and said they have always said this is a temporary road. This isn't the case, because an existing road is 24 feet and future road would require a 36 foot wide, so you can easily put those -- those utilities in there for future use. Also they have said that -- that, really, this is an advantage for us, is the property -- the Waverton would come directly to the center of our -- our development. If you look here you can see that if you come up from Levi Lane, that is this road here, and come over on Waverton that the -- this access is really only accessing this top little portion and we are -- in fact, our main building is down here. So, there is a very small portion that is -- the majority is, pardon me, south and is requiring quite a lot of backtrack. The big issue was that they also said that we didn't have wide drive aisles. I think you can see here -- pardon me -- that we didn't have very large drive aisles and there was some Council Members that took that as a very important point, but you can see here maybe it was because of the scale that they assumed that it wasn't large, but it is quite large and I think in -- just in summarizing to what Michelle was saying, I think it's very important that you say that Brighton communicated to ACHD, ITD, Franklin that it was a permanent road. Also let's skip down to point five, that we moved -- we went through planning and zoning three times. If it was always intended to be a temporary road, then, why did they -- were they so adamant that they move the road. If that was the assumption -- because we went through planning and zoning and -- let me rephrase that. The pain was we went through it three times and if it was known that it was permanent, then, why did we have to go through that. So, in summary -- oh, I will also mention that they did not post their time -- their -- their sign in time. De Weerd: Okay. If you can summarize -- Garcia: Yes. De Weerd: -- please. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 40 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 37 of 48 Garcia: You can look at this date that they did not post it in time and in conclusion we ask that you do not approve it, because -- until Brighton or BVA proposes a plan that leaves the road in its current location or that Franklin Sensors receives approval and assigns equivalent access. So, we have had discussions, but we want something -- De Weerd: Okay. Garcia: -- in writing. Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you. So, can I ask for clarification. You went through planning and zoning with the city or is this -- you're a county sub right? Garcia: Yes, ma'am. De Weerd: And -- and when we have county subs that develop before we have annexed out there, these are the kind of things that happen. We don't get alignment and -- and this is -- this is one of the things that we like development that happens from the inside out and when you have something outside it -- it does provide these problems of how things align once the annexation gets there. The county approved this without the -- the city process and -- and I think that's one of the reasons why we like to see more of the annexation line, so that these kind of things are well planned in advance and each parcel as they start to come on align with that. So, I -- I can -- I hear your frustration and I don't know how the road process goes, because we do have an Ada County Highway District and a countywide road process, but I do know that is one of the reasons that we do like that in -- in to out, so we avoid these kind of things. Thank you, Karen. Okay. So, those are the -- the ones that signed up. We are a couple of minutes before 8:00, which is our hard stop, and so, Council, at this point it looks like we need to continue this application with our apologies. We did not know we wouldn't have that quorum to continue. We appreciate everyone's time that has come down to provide testimony. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes. Cavener: You typically -- I know that we are up against a hard stop, but -- and I know that we just took the people on the list, but I know typically after that you ask if there is anybody else that's -- De Weerd: I do, but we don't have time and I will at that time those that haven't yielded their time to a speaker or that hasn't already provided testimony, we would at this time offer that opportunity, but because we do have a hard stop I don't have that opportunity. Mr. Nary, I guess Mrs. Milam did ask a question that I would like to ask. Even though we would not have the opportunity to vote, Mrs. Milam could listen to the tape. We know a decision can't be made tonight, but additional testimony to be taken with the Council having the opportunity to listen to the testimony before action from Council. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 41 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 38 of 48 Nary: Madam Mayor, I mean, yes, I think you -- I think you can do that. I think the concern is, again, of the record getting a little jumbled by kind of cutting -- I mean by having people testify, the people are going to make the decision aren't here, we are going to rely on a tape later or reviewing transcripts. I don't know how a court will review that. I would be concerned that the district court would be concerned about, really, the clarity of the hearing being broken up like that and really requiring one of the voting members to have to re-listen to it to ensure they have heard it. I -- I'm a little concerned about it. I don't -- I'm not saying you couldn't do it, I'm just a little concerned on how we pose that to a district court if we were asked that question. De Weerd: Okay. Again, our apologies for -- for the situation. Okay. We have a little bit more time. We just bought. So, with that said we have gone through those that have signed up to testify. Is there anyone else who would like to provide testimony? Denise. Good evening. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. LaFever: I'm waiting for it to get up real quick. All right. My name is Denise LaFever. 6706 North Salvia Way. As far as this project goes, I went back through and looked and I -- one thing that I noticed is that they advertised this project way before the application went in. You know, they are really excited about it. They have been on TV several different times and the players that are involved in it are Ball Venture Ahlquist, Brighton Corporation, and HCH healthcare, which is a 3.87 billion dollar company and all along they have been advertising 90,000 square feet of space. What you will see here is right on their site. This is what they are advertising to the public and the investors right here and in this year this is the schematic that they are advertising to their investors for this site. In addition, these are the elevations within their site, which are the same elevations that are in our package. So, that's the elevations that are present. This is a square foot -- square feet that they are advertising here and 86,000 was just the square feet based on the calculation, plus an estimate for the first floor. So, the intent is to have a building over 90,000 square feet. Once again, here is your office plaza. That's the same elevation that is in the package that we have from the staff that's advertised on their site. That's 45,000 plus square feet. In addition, we have an office flex, which is 36,000 square feet. Right here the phasing plan, you have a 95,000 square foot building, a 48,000 square foot building, a 50,000 square foot building and right here this -- and the staff report says this is a high intensity use. These highlighted areas represent the areas that it doesn't meet, it doesn't go back through and meet the zoning requirement. This is actually a Comprehensive Plan change from what I'm seeing. In addition, we have a road right here that says you have to meet access requirements right here. There was a question in September 15th if the word existed. It says right here that you can't go from residential to commercial. This used to be residential and now it's commercial. You can't increase intensities. Well, right now prior was residential. The FLUM isn't commercial. You also have a point that's less than a half a mile. It's close, it's .45 miles from center to center, but it's not a half mile. Here is what the road used to look like right here. Shows residential. But my biggest concern I have all is the shifting burden. We are allowing the development to kick up the intensity of the use of this project and shift the burdens back over to taxpayers. Fire service, page two, there is an aerial device is required. Impact fees don't cover that. Why aren't we asking the developer to cover that? No impact fees Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 42 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 39 of 48 collected on state highways. The intensity and use of this -- of this proposed development is above the FLUM envisioned will impact and access traffic. This will further contribute to congestion and shift the burden to taxpayers to fix the problem in the future. There is other -- De Weerd: Denise, can you -- LaFever: I'm wrapping it up. There are other things that they can do to lessen the impact of the intensity and density on this and -- and the water in here, there is no determination on pressure of water flow. You know, those kind of decisions in north America -- it's important with water. Those decisions need to be made. And last, but not least, police office -- they are asking for a substation benefit -- a substation within the area and they are going to lease it back to us, which is a -- which is a benefit to the hospital, because a lot of emergency rooms have police officers in it and yet we are going to -- De Weerd: Denise. LaFever: -- we are going to be paying for that. De Weerd: Thank you. LaFever: I think we need to be asking the developer if they want to have this intensity and density to kick it up a notch and -- and help pay for some of this, so -- De Weerd: Thank you. Is there any further testimony? Okay. Yes, ma'am. Good evening. Thank you for joining us. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Wilson: Hi. Thank you. My name is Lucretia Wilson and I work for Franklin Sensors and I just wanted to point out, like they explained, that we have went up in front of the board for three times trying to get this road all taken care, but we have trucks that have to come through for four deliveries and the way they want to move our road it's going to take our trucks to where -- it's going to have to go by the hospital and the residents that they are going to put in for assisted living, which is usually elderly people and our diesel trucks are going to have to flow that way and try to turn those big diesel's left and go around all of those and at the same time, you know, if they are out there for their walks, it's not that easy to stop, you know, if somebody accidentally goes out into the road, you know, where there is no stop signs and stuff to stop a diesel. I mean everybody knows you cannot stop a diesel on a dime like you can cars and so the road that we have now that they fought to get that road is a straight shot for our trucks, so that they just come off of Chinden and they have this small curve and, then, they go straight into our parking for the deliveries and like Karen explained, our parking is a big area. I mean these diesels pull up into the parking and, then, they back down in there for our deliveries and plus we have all of our employees that go to work and it's going to make us have to -- I know it's just inconvenient for us, but we are all going to have to go a complete different route that's going to take us longer to get to work and the same thing, you're going to have all of the different residents Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 43 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 40 of 48 from them wanting to have the street go out by that assisted living and the hospital, so I would -- I just wanted to explain and for people to think about how hard it's going to be for those diesel trucks to make those turns safely with everything. De Weerd: Thank you. Thank you for your testimony. Any further testimony? Okay. Would the applicant like to comment. Turnbull: Madam Mayor and Members of the Council, David Turnbull. Glad to say our new address is 2929 West Navigator in Meridian. Just a little history and it's going to be difficult to go point by point on every one of these issues, but I think, Madam Mayor, you kind of pointed out the crux of my -- what I would like to say. This is what happens when somebody jumps out in advance with no public services, no planning, no traffic studies, none of that and plops down a commercial development in an unincorporated zone. So, a little history. We purchased this property back in about 2007, I believe, and we entered immediately thereafter into a deep and long recession. So, we became farmers and aspiring developers at that point. We have talked to the city at length about what they want to see out in this area. As you know, we have been active in the north Meridian area for a number of years. We initiated and funded the North Meridian Area Plan. Part of the key points of that plan was creating jobs where people live and creating backage roads or collector roads backing and paralleling Chinden. Those are the kind of things we are -- we are trying to accomplish here. ITD came along with the Highway 16 extension. They needed to acquire right of way from us for the interchange at that intersection and also some alternative access to the other property owners, because they were going to cut off Pollard Lane from access to Chinden. We specifically negotiated in that agreement, because we had no development plan, we hadn't done any studies, we hadn't done any traffic studies, that we needed to be able to relocate that road at the time when we had a development plan in place. That's specifically in the ITD contract. We had to build the road that's in there now, because at a time certain ITD said we have to cut out Pollard and we were going to have to build a road there and so that's what they funded. That was because they were cutting off access to those properties. We were in long discussions with the people on north -- north of us. They have been delightful to work with. I even had several meetings -- at least two meetings with Mr. Dorrough before they started any development plans, pointing out that this is going to a problem. Access is going to be a problem. I offered to trade him properties for something east of Levi Lane so we wouldn't run into these issues. I offered to trade him for property somewhere else that was already serviced with the services. He didn't want to consider that and that's his right, that's fine, but it shouldn't power us into something that we are handicapped because they jumped out there in advance, did a development in the county and didn't do all the things that we are doing, like traffic studies and -- and -- and everything that we have to go through. If we have time I can let Tom Peterson address the comment that we only met with them two times. I know that's not true. Tom has been in constant communication with them. But every time he offers something they want something more and every time they do that they come in and oppose us. I mean this has got to be a two way street here. We are bringing annexation path to them. We are providing services to them. They have a sign out on their property right now that says septic and well. You know, that's their services. The road that we did for them is a two lane 24 foot road. It Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 44 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 41 of 48 would have to be torn up to install water, gas and all those utilities. It just would. So, even if we did that we would have to provide another alternative access to them. We put in a plan to provide access to that while -- while we build a five lane arterial standard road on Levi and a commercial collector road on Waverton. They will have superior access to what they have now. The access that's there now just simply doesn't work from a traffic study standpoint. The idea that we misled ACHD commissioners -- my goodness, we have been with ACHD staff and ITD staff and they can tell you -- and Franklin Sensors has been in there making their point with the same staff members -- they vetted us thoroughly and they have approved these -- this relocation. So, I think from ITD's standpoint and ACHD's standpoint we have created a superior traffic pattern. You know, I can -- I can tell you that we do have a post -- a date stamp posting on the property. I don't know what Denise was getting into with all her square footage figures. The first building, the medical office building, is a 90,000 square foot building. That's what she seems to be referring to as us representing that that's all we were going to build. That's never been the plan. And in Planning and Zoning Commission, the Commissioners specifically asked the fire chief -- not fire chief, but one of the fire deputies if they could service this property and they said, yes, we can service this property. So, all of those arguments have been addressed. You know, we have done the same thing with your staff as we have done with ACHD and ITD's staff. We have thoroughly vetted this project. When we did first came in they said you need to flip this around so that the hospital, the higher intensity component -- component of this is away from the residential, with the helli pad, they wanted that away from the residential. They said that was what would fit with the Comprehensive Plan. So, you know, again, I just think it's a -- the county set a bad precedence on this. If we invest the kind of money we do to build business parks where people can come in and get a building permit, you know, and, then, your -- the county or the city will allow somebody go out in a corn field, buy a piece of property on the cheap, put in a septic and a well and call that a development and, then, wait for somebody else to bring in the services, I think that's what causes the problems. Like I said, we have tried to work with them and, you know, Tom Peterson continues to try to work with them and he's had numerous conversations and numerous meetings. I don't know if I have covered all the bullet points here that have been raised, but I would certainly be glad to stand for any questions if I didn't. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: I think it was Denise brought up something about an aerial or fire or something. Do you know anything about that or -- De Weerd: Aerial fire truck. Bongiorno: Correct. Milam: Do they get to buy us a fire truck? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 45 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 42 of 48 De Weerd: They pay impact -- I mean those are all figured into our impact fees. Bongiorno: Correct. Yeah. The -- Madam Mayor and City Council, that references to the -- because it's a multi-story building there will be an aerial device required for -- that will be needed for that development and at this point the closest aerial device -- our goal is 12 minutes and right now the closest one is 15 minutes away. Milam: The Eagle one? Bongiorno: Right. And -- and that was Chief Niemeyer that you were talking to, the fire chief, and he had mentioned that -- now I just totally lost my train of thought. Oh. Because these buildings are sprinkled we do have extra time. So, that extra three minutes would not be a problem and we can service this project. Milam: Perfect. Thank you. Never mind. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Mr. Turnbull, appreciate your comments and thoughts. You addressed my questions. I did have one that didn't come up. I think it has more to do with -- with the layout of your project. I just want to make sure that I'm correct. I'm looking at your map that's here in front of us all. The emergency portion of this medical facility is going to be accessed off of -- off of Levi? It goes into that kind of roundabout. Is that -- Turnbull: Correct. Cavener: -- am I seeing that as accurate? Turnbull: Correct. Cavener: Thank you. No other questions. De Weerd: Okay. Any other questions from Council? Okay. Thank you. Turnbull: Thank you. De Weerd: So, Council, any questions, follow-up questions for staff, the applicant, or any of those that testified? Allen: Excuse me, Madam Mayor. May I -- there is one additional outstanding item. Per the specific use standards hospitals providing emergency care are required to have direct access onto an arterial street. The access proposed will be via a collector street from State Highway 20-26 from which access is prohibited, except at the half mile between section line roads. The City Council should make a determination on that in their motion Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 46 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 43 of 48 if they feel it meets the intent of this requirement. If so it should be memorialized in the development agreement, please. De Weerd: Thank you, Sonya. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Sonya, the question goes back to you. We heard comments from Jon at the start about the specific design of this collector does serve and function in a way that an arterial would in these circumstances. So, in light of that specific design and application here, do you believe that it meets the intent of that requirement? Allen: Staff feels it can meet the intent of that requirement, yes. But Council should be the decision making body on that. Borton: Certainly. Okay. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: I don't know if -- I hesitate to close the public hearing, because that's proven to be problematic in the past. I will share some thoughts. This was a challenging application for me on paper. It's hard to visualize that and I'm not -- I don't live in that northern part of town and I tried really really hard to not be in a place seeking out things that will make our city attorney mad about looking at areas and so this was one that really having good testimony from the -- from the public and from the applicant and from staff was really really helpful for me -- to me. I sympathize with the residents. You moved out there, you're running your business out there, I think it's amazing to be able to get all these employees to come out and speak in favor of the company. I work in public policy and I can't get my coworkers to come testify to City Council things for me, so I appreciate your passion. When you -- when you look at the outstanding issues and what I heard a lot was not so much about the project, it was more about the access piece and I am not pretty enough to play an ACHD commissioner and so I typically yield to our traffic engineers and our traffic experts and in the staff report it speaks very very clearly and very very directly about the highway district's decision about where Pollard should be. So, it's hard for me to question that based on the sufficient information being provided by them. I did have some questions about the access with the -- with the collector piece off of Levi. I think staff and the applicant have -- have satisfied that. So, I'm -- I'm one that's supportive of this application. I think it's a good project for north Meridian. I think it meets what is going to be a growing demand for services out in that area. I'm really looking forward to having it in Meridian. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 47 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 44 of 48 De Weerd: Any other comment? I agree with Mr. Cavener. Sometimes as you comment we might find additional need for information from staff or the applicant or any of those that provided testimony. So, any further comment? Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: I really concur with Councilman Cavener tonight. Reading through the staff report there was like -- there seemed to be so much -- so many unanswered issues, but I feel that the applicant pretty much answered most of them with their opening remarks that -- obviously, that -- that your street, Pollard, is a -- it's a big issue and it's a big issue for you guys and it stinks. This is a really bad situation. But, unfortunately, we need to take the advice of the experts in that area and to try to change what the road jurisdiction does by saying we know better. I don't feel that would be an accurate or an adequate thing to do. It would be like them trying to change what we do on a daily basis. Yeah, if it was life safety or something else. So, unfortunately, I'm sorry to you guys. I wish we could keep your road, but the law just doesn't allow for that. So, I'm pretty much in favor of this application. I feel like most of the questions have been answered as well. De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Little Roberts: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Litter Roberts. Little Roberts: Madam Mayor, I concur with the two previous council. This was an application with a whole lot of information and a lot to chew on and I think it's been great, the process that we have gone through. I concur that it's -- we need to follow the process and it's too bad that with such a great business we kind of got things out of whack with something going in the county before the city met that area and I certainly feel for all of you, but agree that we need to let the experts do what they do and that is roads. That is not our purview. But I concur that I think this is a good project and appreciate the fact that it will keep some traffic off of Chinden with the purpose that you have dealt with with the roads and so I am in support of this project as it's -- as it's worked its way through the process. De Weerd: Any further comment? If there is no further comment, I would entertain a motion to close the public hearing. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: I move we close the public hearing on Item 11-D, Pollard Subdivision, H-2019- 0021. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 48 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 45 of 48 Milam: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing on Item 11-D. All those a favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: I move we approve 11-D, Pollard Subdivision, H-2019-0021, to include all staff, applicant, and public testimony with specific approval that the collector street from State Highway 20-26 be a sufficient connection to a medical facility -- hospital facility. Milam: Second. De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Any needed clarity from staff? Okay. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Rol Bernt, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 12: Department Reports A. Public Works: Budget Amendment for FY 2019 in the Amount of 208, 190 for Well 20B Rehabilitation (Action Item) De Weerd: Thank you for joining us. Item 12-A is under Department Reports. We have our Public Works Department, Kyle Radek, here to present a budget amendment for Well 20-B rehab. Radek: Madam Mayor, Council Members, this item is a budget amendment in the amount of 208,190 dollars for Well 20-B rehabilitation. In October of last year routine testing identified some water quality issues that required investigation. So, the well was taken offline and since that time assessment activities have identified a number of actions that are necessary to rehabilitate this well and put it back into service. We typically budget each year for well assessments where the removal of the pump and cameraing, looking at the well components, any routine type of maintenance, pump rebuild type stuff, can be paid for. However, when Well 20-B was -- was -- pumping facility was pulled we got a significant surprise. There was an extremely corrosive environment in there. All the low carbon steel components of the well were corroding and they, quite frankly, just need to Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 49 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 46 of 48 be replaced. The pumping plant needs to be replaced. The pump column needs to be replaced. So, there is a significant amount of parts that are stainless steel that are going to have to go in there and a lot of contractor work, some -- some expensive chemicals to get that thing cleaned up and we really need that well to be back online this summer, because it's one of our -- one of our higher quality wells. We want to maintain our water quality level of service this summer. So, with that we are asking Council to approve this budget amendment for 208,190 dollars and I will stand for any questions. De Weerd: Thank you, Kyle. Council, any questions? Little Roberts: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Madam Mayor, seeing no questions, I move that we approve the budget amendment for the well cleanup for the amount of 208,190 dollars. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 12-A for the budget amendment as presented. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Bernt, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Item 13: Ordinances A. Ordinance No. 19- 1826: An Ordinance (H-2019-0119— ICOM Parking Expansion) For Annexation Of A Parcel Of Land Being APN: S1118417268 And The Adjacent Rights-Of-Ways Of South Locust Grove & East Central Drive, Located In The Northeast 1/ 4 Of The Southeast 1/4 Of Section 28, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, As Described In Attachment "A" And Annexing Certain Lands And Territory, Situated In Ada County, Idaho, And Adjacent And Contiguous To The Corporate Limits Of The City Of Meridian As Requested By The City Of Determining The Land Use Zoning Classification Of 2. 91 Acres Of Land From R6 To C-G (General Retail And Service Commercial) Zoning District In The Meridian Providing That Copies Of This Ordinance Shall Be Filed With ` The Ada County Assessor, The Ada County Recorder, And The Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 50 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 47 of 48 For A Date. De Weerd: Item 13-A is Ordinance 19-1826. Mr. Clerk, will you, please, read this by title. Johnson: Thank you, Mayor. Ordinance 19-1826. An ordinance, H-2019-0119, ICOM Parking Expansion, for annexation of a parcel of land being APN:S1118417268 and the adjacent rights-of-ways of South Locust Grove and East Central Drive, located in the northeast 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of Section 28, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise meridian, Ada county, Idaho, as described in Attachment "A" and annexing certain lands and territory situated in Ada county, Idaho, and adjacent and contiguous to the corporate limits of the City of Meridian as requested by the City of Meridian determining the land use zoning classification of 2.91 acres of land from R-6 to C-G, General Retail and Service Commercial Zoning District, in the Meridian City Code providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission providing for a sum and providing an effective date. De Weerd: Thank you. You have heard this read by title. Is there anyone who would like to hear it read in its entirety? Okay. Council, do I have a motion? Little Roberts: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Madam Mayor, I move that we approve Ordinance 19-1826 with suspension of rules. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 13-A. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Bernt, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. B. First Reading of Ordinance No. 19-1827: An Ordinance To Amend The Municipal Code Of The City Of Meridian, County Of Ada, State Of Idaho, Amending Title 10, Chapter 7, Section 12 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 51 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 48 of 48 (E)( 2), Meridian City Code, Known As The Meridian Impact Fee Ordinance Fee The Police, Fire, And Parks And Recreation Impact Fee Effective Date. De Weerd: Item 13-B is the first reading of three for Ordinance 19-1827. Mr. Clerk, will you, please, read this by title. Johnson: Thank you, Madam Mayor. Ordinance 19-1827, an ordinance to amend the municipal code of the City of Meridian, county of Ada, State of Idaho, amending Title 10, Chapter 7, Section 12(e)(2), Meridian City Code, known as the Meridian Impact Fee De Weerd: Thank you so much. We will have the second reading on our next Council agenda. Item 14: Future Meeting Topics De Weerd: Council, any items Under 14? Okay. With that I would entertain a motion to adjourn. Cavener: So moved. Bernt: Second. De Weerd: What did you move? Cavener: Adjourn the meeting. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to adjourn the meeting. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:27 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) _______________________________ ______/______/______ MAYOR TAMMY DE WEERD DATE APPROVED ATTEST: _____________________________________ CHRIS JOHNSON - INTERIM CITY CLERK Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda June 4, 2019 – Page 52 of 467 Meridian City Council May 21, 2018 Page 48 of 48 (E)( 2), Meridian City Code, Known As The Meridian Impact Fee Ordinance Fee Schedule; To Provide For An Amendment To The Police, Fire, And Parks And Recreation Impact Fee Schedules; And Providing An Effective Date. De Weerd: Item 13-B is the first reading of three for Ordinance 19-1827. Mr. Clerk, will you, please, read this by title. Johnson: Thank you, Madam Mayor. Ordinance 19-1827, an ordinance to amend the municipal code of the City of Meridian, county of Ada, State of Idaho, amending Title 10, Chapter 7, Section 12(e)(2), Meridian City Code, known as the Meridian Impact Fee Ordinance Fee Schedule; to provide for an amendment to the police, fire, and parks and recreation impact fee schedules; and providing an effective date. De Weerd: Thank you so much. We will have the second reading on our next Council agenda. Item 14: Future Meeting Topics De Weerd: Council, any items Under 14? Okay. With that I would entertain a motion to adjourn. Cavener: So moved. Bernt: Second. De Weerd: What did you move? Cavener: Adjourn the meeting. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to adjourn the meeting. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:27 P.M. (AUDIO ILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) r /q/ 20 L-9 MAY("MY MY DE WEERD DATE APPROVED ATTFT: „ /f QOapZEDAUGvsr CKM JGVNS0-1T--fNTERIM CITY CLERK City or W E IDR IAN�- a SEAL �P of C -G zoning D istricts 12. D epar tment Reports A. P ublic Works: B udget Amendment for F Y 2019 in the Amount of $208,190 for Well 20B Rehabilitation (Action Item) - Approved 13. O rdinances A. O rdinance No. 19- 1826: An O r dinance (H-2019-0119– I C O M P arking E xpansion) F or Annexation O f A P ar cel O f L and B eing AP N: S 1118417268 And T he Adjacent Rights-O f-Ways Of South L ocust G r ove & E ast C entral D rive, L ocated In T he Nor theast ¼ Of T he S outheast ¼ O f S ection 28, Township 3 North, Range 1 E ast, Boise M er idian, Ada C ounty, I daho, As D escr ibed In Attachment “A” And Annexing C er tain L ands And Territory, S ituated In Ada County, Idaho, And Adjacent And Contiguous To T he C orporate L imits O f T he C ity O f M eridian As Requested B y T he City Of M eridian; E stablishing And D eter mining T he L and Use Zoning Classification O f 2.91 Acr es O f L and F rom R6 To C-G (G ener al Retail And S ervice C ommer cial) Zoning D istrict In T he M eridian City C ode; Providing T hat C opies O f T his O rdinance S hall B e F iled With T he Ada C ounty Assessor, T he Ada County Recor der, And T he Idaho S tate Tax C ommission, As Requir ed B y L aw; And P roviding F or A S ummary O f T he O r dinance; And P roviding F or A Waiver O f T he Reading Rules; And P r oviding An E ffective D ate. - Approved B. F ir st Reading of O rdinance No. 19- 1827: An O rdinance To Amend T he M unicipal C ode O f T he C ity O f M eridian, C ounty Of Ada, S tate O f Idaho, Amending T itle 10, C hapter 7, S ection 12(E )(2), M eridian City C ode, K nown As T he M er idian Impact F ee O r dinance F ee S chedule; To P rovide F or An Amendment To T he P olice, Fir e, And P arks And Recr eation Impact F ee S chedules; And Providing An E ffective D ate. 14. F uture M eeting Topics Meeting Adjourned at 8:27 PM CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 5 Project File Name/Number: Item Title: Announcements Meeting Notes: EIDIIAN,*-- � CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 Project File Name/Number: Item Title: Future Meeting Topics — Public Forum (Up to 30 Minutes Maximum) Signing up prior to the start of the meeting is required. This time is reserved for the public to address their elected officials regarding matters of general interest or concern of public matters and is not specific to an active land use/development application. By law, no decisions can be made on topics presented under this public comment section, other than the City Council may request that the topic be added to a future meeting agenda for a more detailed discussion or action. The Mayor may also direct staff to further assist you in resolving the matter following the meeting Meeting Notes: 5/21/2019 City of Meridian - Public Hearing Sign In Form Tools Details and Signatures For Public Hearing Hearing Date: 5/21/2019 Hearing Type: Public Forum Active: *-' Go Back To List Export To Excel © 2019 - City of Meridian, Idaho http:Hi nternalapps/SIGN INFORM TOOLS/Si gnlnForm Detai Is?id=234 1/1 Sign In Signature Name Discussion Topic Date/Time 5/21/2019 Denise LaFever Sign in Process for Public Hearings 5:38:35 PM Zowie Neilson, Izzy Introduce city wide policy to ban use of traditional and electronic 5/21/2019 Cooper, Oliver Brien smoking while in a vehicle with a minor present. 5:46:52 PM 5/21/2019 Susan Elcox Better Hearing Month proclamation signing 5:59:40 PM Go Back To List Export To Excel © 2019 - City of Meridian, Idaho http:Hi nternalapps/SIGN INFORM TOOLS/Si gnlnForm Detai Is?id=234 1/1 EIDIAN?- DAHJ CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 7 A Project File Name/Number: Item Title: Proclamation - Better Hearing Month Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 7.A . Presenter: Estimated Time for P resentation: Title of I tem - Better Hearing M onth C ouncil Notes: RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate Mayors Office J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/16/2019 - 10:58 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 6 of 576 The Office of the Mayor P R O C L A M A T I O N WHEREAS, hearing healthcare professionals in the City of Meridian, Idaho, observe and celebrate Better Hearing Month each year during the month of May; and WHEREAS, the City of Meridian, Idaho, recognizes and values the efforts of all who work to eliminate or minimize the isolating effects of communication disorders in the one in five families affected by them; and WHEREAS, hearing loss is the third most common health problem in the United States and more than half of the people with hearing loss are younger than age 65; and WHEREAS, our citizens who have overcome communication disabilities through the services of hearing care professionals are now able to lead independent, productive, and fulfilling lives; and WHEREAS, the City of Meridian is proud and honored to have hearing care professionals offering quality education and health care services to its citizens to help them “Hear Well, Live Well” THEREFORE, I, Mayor Tammy de Weerd, hereby do proclaim May 2019 as Better Hearing Month in the City of Meridian and encourage all our citizens to recognize the achievements of hearing care professionals in improving the quality of life for people with communication disorders Dated this 21st day of May, 2019. _____________________________________ Mayor Tammy de Weerd Joe Borton, City Council President Luke Cavener, City Council Vice President Anne Little Roberts, City Council Genesis Milam, City Council Treg Bernt, City Council Ty Palmer, City Council C IDIAN*,----- if,IZDAHO CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 A Project File Name/Number: Item Title: Approve Minutes of May 7, 2019 City Council Regular Meeting Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.A . Presenter: Estimated Time for P resentation: Title of I tem - Appr ove M inutes of M ay 7, 2019 C ity Council Regular M eeting C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate Minutes Minutes 5/13/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/13/2019 - 8:15 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 7 of 576 Meridian City Council Mary 7, 2019 Page 55 of 55 (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) � 19 MAY /I DE WEERD E APPROVED �Pt�p AUGUST' , ATTEST: Chrid Jobtr sWinter y Clerk B IDIAN� 10 AHC Y W J ( �� /rE IDIZNIA*,----,DAHO CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 6 Project File Name/Number: Item Title: Shelburne Subdivision No. 2 Sanitary Sewer Easement Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.B . Presenter: Estimated Time for P resentation: Title of I tem - Shelburne S ubdivision No. 2 S anitary Sewer E asement C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate E asement C over Memo 5/15/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/15/2019 - 8:27 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 63 of 576 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2019-042911 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 05/22/2019 10:35 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE Proiect Name (Subdivision): SHELBURNE SUBDIVISION NO 2 Sanitary Sewer Easement Number: 2 Identify this Easement by sequential number if Project contains more than one sanitary sewer easement. ( See Instructions for additional information), THIS Easement Agreement, made this 21!! day of 204Q between SHELBURNE PROPERTIES IAr ("Grantor"), and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal- rporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement, THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. Sanitary Sewer Easement REV. 03/26/18 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a M a y 2 1 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 6 5 o f 5 7 6 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Tammy deed, Mayor 15 Sohn�n, r►rr-j � clerK- STATE OF IDAHO, ) . ss. County of Ada ) AUG,,,d /VOA� 2 cily or (✓MB IDAHO SEAL \Pu This record was acknowledged before me on S-21-1-9 (date) by Tammy de Weerd and C.Jay Coles on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. CHARLEI��►Y COMMISSIOONN 390 Notary Signature NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires: STATE OF IDAHO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 3/28/22 Sanitary Sewer Easement REV. 03/26/18 SheAburn e, M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a M a y 2 1 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 6 7 o f 5 7 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a M a y 2 1 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 6 8 o f 5 7 6 �DAHO IDIAN*,----- W,IZ, CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 C Project File Name/Number: H-2019-0050 Item Title: Final Plat for Blakeslee Commons No. 2 By Bungalows Meridian, LLC. Located on the South Side of E. Ustick Rd. between Eagle Rd. and Locust Grove Rd. Meeting Notes: c✓ I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.C . Presenter: Estimated Time for P resentation: Title of I tem - F inal P lat for B lakeslee C ommons No. 2 (H-2019-0050) by Bungalows M eridian, L L C , Located on the S outh side of E. Ustick Rd. between E agle Rd. and L ocust Grove Rd. C lick Here for A pplication Materials C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate S taff Report S taf f R eport 5/16/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/16/2019 - 10:57 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 69 of 576 Page 1 HEARING DATE: 5/21/2019 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Stephanie Leonard, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2019-0050 Blakeslee Commons No. 2 LOCATION: South side of E. Ustick Rd. between N. Locust Grove Rd. and N. Eagle Rd., in the NE ¼ of Section 5, Township 3N., Range 1W. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat consisting of twenty-eight (28) building lots and two (2) common lots on 3.94 acres of land in the R-15 zoning district. This is the second and final phase of development for the Blakeslee Commons Subdivision preliminary plat (H-2016-0066). II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Owner/Representative: Bungalows Meridian, LLC. P.O. Box 1297 Eagle, ID 83616 III. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed final plat depicts 28 building lots, and two (2) common area lots on 3.94 acres of land in the R-15 zoning district. Development is required to comply with the dimensional standards of the R- 15 zoning district listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6. Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for consistency with the approved preliminary plat and found there are the same number of building and common lots as were depicted on the preliminary plat. Because the number of building and common lots has stayed the same, Staff finds the proposed final plat to be in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat per the standards listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 70 of 576 Page 2 The landscape buffer along E. Ustick Rd. was constructed with the first phase of development aside from an eastern portion of the property boundary that was left open for construction access. The construction access shall be closed and landscaped in accord with DA and UDC requirements. Two (2) common driveways are proposed in this phase of development within common Lot 26, Block 4 and in an easement on Lots 20 & 21, Block 4. Common driveways shall be constructed per UDC 11-6C-3D, the applicant shall submit an exhibit depicting any lots using the common driveways, the setbacks, fencing, building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures prior to obtaining signature on the final plat. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways shall be prohibited, unless separated by a minimum five foot (5') wide landscaped buffer. There is no fencing proposed along the abutting property boundary of the applicable lots (Lot 20, 21, & 26, Block 4) however, if solid fencing is desired, a five-foot wide landscaped buffer shall be required. Lot 28, Block 4 is double-fronted by roadway and is considered a through-lot; UDC 11-6C-3A.1 prohibits through lots. Lot 27, Block 4 shall be extended ten-feet in width to the rear of Lot 28, Block 4 to provide a landscape buffer to E. Picard Court. IV. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat within the conditions noted in Section VIII of this report. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 71 of 576 Page 3 V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat (date: 9/29/2016) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 72 of 576 Page 4 B. Final Plat (date: 3/29/2019) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 73 of 576 Page 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 74 of 576 Page 6 C. Landscape Plan (date: 3/19/2019) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 75 of 576 Page 7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 76 of 576 Page 8 VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the approved preliminary plat (H-2016-0066), development agreement (Inst. No. 2017-032110) applications approved for this site. 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the subject final plat within two years of the City Engineer’s signature on the previous phase final plat (on or before October 31, 2020), or apply for a time extension, in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. Per the recorded DA, the applicant is required to obtain CZC and DES approval and construct the clubhouse and site amenities within the first phase of development. Prior to signature on the final plat this amenity shall be constructed. 5. The final plat prepared by Tealey’s Land Surveying, by Patrick A. Tealey, shall be revised as follows: a. Note #8: Include the recorded instrument number for the Master Declaration referenced. b. Note #12: Modify note to include lot numbers that will be taking access from the common driveway lots. c. Note #13: Include the recorded development agreement number associated with this development (DA Inst. No. 2017-032110). d. Include Professional Land Surveyor signature and written date. 6. The landscape plan prepared by Jensen Belts Associates, dated 3/19/19, shall be revised as follows: a. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways shall be prohibited, unless separated by a minimum five-foot (5') wide landscaped buffer. There is no fencing proposed along the abutting property boundary of the applicable lots (Lot 20-22, Block 4 and Lot 26, Block 4) however, if solid fencing is proposed a five-foot (5’) wide landscaped buffer shall is required. b. Lot 27, Block 4 shall be expanded an additional 10-feet in width to create a landscape buffer to Lot 28, Block 4 in accord with UDC 11-6C-3A.1. c. The construction access along the eastern boundary of the site shall be closed and landscaped in accord with DA and UDC requirements. One (1) full-size copy and one (1) electronic copy of a revised landscape plan including the mitigation plan shall be submitted prior to signature on the final plat. 7. For lots accessed by common driveways, an exhibit is required that depicts the setbacks, fencing, building envelope and orientation of the lots and structures. Driveways for abutting properties that are not taking access from the common driveway(s) should be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line away from the common driveway. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited unless separated by a minimum 5-foot wide landscaped buffer. Prior to City Engineer’s signature on final plat, the applicant shall provide a common driveway exhibit for Lots 20-25, Block 4. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 77 of 576 Page 9 8. A perpetual ingress-egress easement for the common driveway(s) proposed on Lot 20, 21, and 26, Block 4 shall be filed with the Ada County Recorder, which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. A copy of the recorded easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 9. Future homes constructed in this phase shall be consistent with the approved elevations and design guidelines contained in the development agreement for the Blakeslee Commons Subdivision (2017-032110). The rear elevations of homes visible from public streets and open spaces shall also be subject to these guidelines. Future homes adjacent to E. Ustick Rd. (Lots 2-6, Block 5) shall incorporate a mix of materials, windows and decorative trim, and two variations in the roof lines to provide articulation and modulation to the side and rear facades that face the arterial street. 10. Prior to issuance of any new building permits, the property shall be subdivided in accordance with UDC requirements. 11. Staff’s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions: 1. The following development plan sheet revisions were noted during a cursory review of the development plans, and should not be considered all inclusive: a. Sheet C4.0: Add note to connect to existing water main. Water main dead-end in E Ringneck St should have a blowoff, not valve box (wrong key note called out). b. Sheet C4.1: No water main in private drives (off of cul-de-sac) - eliminate 4" mains. End 8" water main before private drives with a hydrant and take services down private drives to lots. Add note to connect to existing water in Picard. c. The angle between the two sanitary sewer service stubs going to lots 5 and 6, on E. Ringneck St., appears to be too small and revisions to service these lots may be needed. Ensure minimum horizontal separation between water and sewer services. 2. Temporary dead-end water main may cause water quality issues until extended and connected east. VII. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 78 of 576 Page 10 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non- health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 79 of 576 Page 11 installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42- 1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 80 of 576 EIDIANC-- �J CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 D Project File Name/Number: H-2019-0039 Item Title: Final Plat for Movado Subdivision No. 5 By Movado Development, LLC, Located approximately 1/2 mile South of E. Overland Rd., West of S. Movado Way Meeting Notes: c✓ I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.D . Presenter: Estimated Time for P resentation: Title of I tem - F inal P lat for M ovado S ubdivision No. 5 (H-2019-0039) by M ovado D evelopment, L L C , L ocated approximately 1/2 mile south of E . Overland Rd., West of S . M ovado Way C lick Here for A pplication Materials C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate S taff Report S taf f R eport 5/16/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/16/2019 - 8:28 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 81 of 576 Page 1 HEARING DATE: 5/21/2019 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Kevin Holmes, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2019-0039 Movado Subdivision No. 5 LOCATION: Approximately ¼ mile south of E. Overland Rd. on the west side of S. Movado Way, in the W ½ of the NE ¼ of Section 21, Township 3N., Range 1E. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant proposes a final plat consisting of forty (40) single family residential building lots and three (3) common lots on 7.44 acres of land in the R-15 zoning district. This is the fifth phase of development of the Movado Subdivision. NOTE: The applicant is including the re-platting of three (3) residential building lots (Lots 56-58, Block 3) originally recorded with Movado No. 2. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Movado Development, LLC – 4824 W. Fairview Ave., Boise, ID 83706 B. Owner: Same as applicant C. Representative: Same as applicant III. STAFF ANALYSIS The subject property was included in the Movado Subdivision preliminary plat. STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 82 of 576 Page 2 The minimum property size in this phase of development is 4,628 square feet (s.f.) with an average size of 6,056 s.f. In phase one of the Movado Subdivision, 15.41 acres of open space were installed, for a total of 15% of the entire subdivision. No additional open space or amenities are proposed with this phase. Lots proposed in this phase are for single-family detached and attached homes and must comply with the dimensional standards of the R-15 zoning district listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7 as follows: Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat in accord with the requirements listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. This includes the review of the additional three (3) lots that were originally recorded with the Movado Subdivision No. 2 (Lots 56- 58, Block 3). The proposed final plat depicts the same number of building lots and the inclusion of the three lots does not increase the lot count approved with the preliminary plat (see Exhibit A and B). Therefore, Staff finds the proposed final plat in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. IV. DECISION Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat within the conditions noted in Section VIII of this report. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 83 of 576 Page 3 V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat (date: 10/11/2016) Three lots previously platted with Movado No. 2. Now included in this plat. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 84 of 576 Page 4 B. Proposed Final Plat (date: 4/12/2019) Three lots previously platted with Movado No. 2. Now included in this plat. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 85 of 576 Page 5 C. Landscape Plan for entire Movado Subdivision (dated: 03/12/2019) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 86 of 576 Page 6 D: Common Drive Exhibit Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 87 of 576 Page 7 VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development (AZ H-2016-0112; Development Agreements #2017-012608 (Amended # 2017- 024757); DES A-2017-0232). 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the subject final plat within two years of the City Engineer’s signature on the previous phase final plat, by November 8, 2020, or apply for a time extension in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer, the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster, Sue Prescott, at 887-1620 for more information. 5. Design of homes constructed within the subdivision shall be generally consistent with the conceptual building elevation photos included in the development agreement and approved with DES A-2017-0232. 6. All fencing installed on the site must be consistent with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. If permanent fencing does not exist at the subdivision boundary, temporary construction fencing to contain debris shall be installed around this phase prior to release of building permits. 7. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer, per UDC 11-3F-3B.4, the applicant shall provide documentation of a binding contract that establishes the party or parties responsible for the maintenance and repair of the private street, including regulations for the funding thereof. 8. The final plat prepared by Sawtooth Land Surveying, LLC, stamped on 4/12/2019 by Carl Porter, is approved as shown in Exhibit B. a. Note #4: Remove “unless otherwise modified by conditional use permit.” 9. The landscape plan, installed with phase one, prepared by T-O Engineers, dated 5/31/2017, is approved as shown in Exhibit C. 10. Staff’s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions: 1. Given the nature of this development, a public street light plan is not required. Public streetlights are not required for private roads. General Conditions: 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 88 of 576 Page 8 forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub -grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construct ion inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 89 of 576 Page 9 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20 -feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 19. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 20. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non- domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 21. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 22. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 23. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 90 of 576 �rEIDIAN*,----- DAHOIZ, CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 E Project File Name/Number: H-2019-0051 Item Title: Final Plat for Movado Subdivision No. 6 By Evans Development, Located approximately 1/2 mile South of E. Overland Rd., West of S. Cloverdale Rd. Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.E . Presenter: Estimated Time for P resentation: Title of I tem - F inal P lat for M ovado S ubdivision No. 6 (H-2019-0051) by E vans Development, L L C , Located 1/2 mile S outh of E. Overland Rd, West of S . Cloverdale Rd. C lick Here for A pplication Materials C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate S taff Report S taf f R eport 5/16/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/16/2019 - 8:27 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 91 of 576 Page 1 HEARING DATE: 5/21/2019 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Kevin Holmes, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2019-0051 Movado Subdivision No. 6 LOCATION: Approximately ½ mile south of E. Overland Rd. on the west side of S. Cloverdale Rd., in the E ½ of Section 21, Township 3N., Range 1E.. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant proposes a final plat consisting of thirty-three (33) building lots and eight (8) common lots on 10.53 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district. This is the sixth phase of development of the Movado Subdivision. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Evans Development LLC – 7761 W. Riverside Dr. Ste 100, Boise, ID, 83706 B. Owner: Same as applicant C. Representative: Conger Management Group – 4824 W. Fairview Ave., Boise, ID 83706 III. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed final plat depicts thirty-three (33) single-family residential building lots and eight (8) common lots on 10.53 acres of land in an R-8 zoning district. The gross density of the proposed subdivision is 3.13 dwelling units (d.u.) per acre with a net density of 4.52 d.u. per acre. The applicant proposes single-family detached homes for this phase of the development. The minimum property size in this phase of development is 8,211 square feet (s.f.) with an average size of 9,632 s.f. A total of 0.96 STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 92 of 576 Page 2 acres (or 9.12%) of open space is provided with this phase consisting of a regional pathway along the Eight Mile Creek and a micro-pathway connecting to it. Lots proposed in this phase are for single- family detached homes and must comply with the dimensional standards of the R-8 zoning district listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 as follows: Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat in accord with the requirements listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. The proposed final plat depicts the same number of building lots, common lots, open space, and amenities. Therefore, Staff finds the proposed final plat in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. IV. DECISION Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat within the conditions noted in Section VIII of this report. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 93 of 576 Page 3 V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat (date: 10/11/2016) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 94 of 576 Page 4 B. Proposed Final Plat (date: 3/21/2019) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 95 of 576 Page 5 C. Landscape Plan (dated: 03/18/2019) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 96 of 576 Page 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 97 of 576 Page 7 D: Common Drive Exhibit Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 98 of 576 Page 8 VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development (AZ H-2016-0112; Development Agreement inst. #2017-012608 (Amended with inst. # 2017-024757)). 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the subject final plat within two years of the City Engineer’s signature on the previous phase final plat, by November 8, 2020, or apply for a time extension in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer, the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster, Sue Prescott, at 887-1620 for more information. 5. Design of homes constructed within the subdivision shall be generally consistent with the conceptual building elevation photos included in the development agreement. 6. All fencing installed on the site must be consistent with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. If permanent fencing does not exist at the subdivision boundary, temporary construction fencing to contain debris shall be installed around this phase prior to release of building permits. 7. Prior to submittal of a final plat for City Engineer signature, the applicant shall submit public access easements for the 10’ multi-use pathway in Lot 8, Block 8. Submit easements to the Planning Division for Council approval and subsequent recordation. The easements shall be a minimum of 14’ wide (10’ pathway + 2’ shoulder each side). Use standard City template for public access easement. Easement checklist must accompany all easement submittals. Coordinate with Kim Warren from the City of Meridian Parks Department. 8. The final plat prepared by Sawtooth Land Surveying, LLC, stamped on 3/21/2019 by Carl Porter, is approved as shown in Exhibit B. a. Note #4: Remove “unless otherwise modified by conditional use permit.” b. Note #7: Add ACHD license agreement number. c. Note #11: Add development agreement instrument number. d. Note #12: Add master declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions instrument number. 9. The landscape plan prepared by Jensen Belts, dated 3/18/2019, is approved as shown in Exhibit C. 10. Emergency access via Lot 8, Block 7 shall be completed prior to issuance of any more than thirty (30) building permits. 11. Staff’s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 99 of 576 Page 9 B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions: 1. Temporary water quality concerns in dead end lines at east boundary until Movado Estates is constructed and connected to Movado No 6. 2. On Sheet C.302 Applicant shows two 4-inch service lines, serving two separate lots, utilizing cleanouts. Applicant should revise plans to show an additional SSMH between SSMH 7 and SSMH 8. An 8-inch SS line should be extended to serve lots 9 and 10 of Block 7. General Conditions: 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 100 of 576 Page 10 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 101 of 576 Page 11 (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non- domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 102 of 576 EIDIAN*,----- IDAHO CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 F Project File Name/Number: H-2019-0054 Item Title: Final Plat for Silverstone Apartments By Dave Evans Construction, Located at 4107 E. Overland Rd. Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.F. Presenter: Estimated Time for P resentation: Title of I tem - F inal P lat for Silverstone Apartments (H-2019-0054) by Dave Evans C onstruction, L ocated at 4107 E . Overland Rd. C lick Here for A pplication Materials C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate S taff Report S taf f R eport 5/16/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/16/2019 - 7:54 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 103 of 576 Page 1 HEARING DATE: 5/21/2019 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Stephanie Leonard, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2019-0054 Silverstone Apartments LOCATION: 4107 E. Overland Road, in the NW ¼ of the NE ¼ of Section 21, Township 3N., Range 1E. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant, Dave Evans Construction, has applied for a Final Plat consisting of one (1) building lot for a multi-family development (Silverstone Apartments). II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Owner: Dave Evans Construction, LLC. 7761 W. Riverside Dr., Ste. 100 Boise, ID 83714 B. Representative: Corinne Graham, Civil Site Works, LLC. 921 S. Orchard St., Ste. 200 Boise, ID 83705 III. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed final plat depicts one (1) building lot on 5.6 acres of land in the C-G zoning district. The building lot will encompass a multi-family development with eight (8) buildings consisting of 112 units. A clubhouse, sports court, and play structure along with the multi-family units have already been approved with a CZC and DES for the Silverstone Apartments (A-2018-0307). In 2016, this property annexed and entered into a development agreement as the Silverstone Apartments; a CUP was also approved for a 312-unit multi-family development on 13.51 acres of land (H-2016-0060). In 2017, a development agreement modification (DA Inst. No. 2018-012457) to STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 104 of 576 Page 2 include the Silverstone Apartments with the Movado Greens Subdivision and a CUP modification were approved to reduce the acreage and number of units proposed with the Silverstone Apartment Project (H-2016-0060; H-2017-0104). In accord with the DA, the applicant has obtained multi-family building permits prior to recordation of the final plat, a CZC has been approved and the development is currently under construction. The future ROW along E. Overland Rd. shall be improved with vegetative groundcover with a 10-foot gravel shoulder permitted, per the standards in UDC 11-3H-4 and UDC 11-3B-7C. Internal site landscaping was required with the CZC and DES approval; street buffer landscaping adjacent to E. Overland Rd. is a required condition for the subject final plat. Development is required to comply with the dimensional standards of the C-G zoning district listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3. Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for consistency with the approved preliminary plat and found there are the same number of building lots. Staff finds the proposed final plat to be in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat per the standards listed in UDC 11-6B- 3C.2. IV. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section VII of this report. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 105 of 576 Page 3 V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat (date: 7/28/2017) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 106 of 576 Page 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 107 of 576 Page 5 B. Final Plat (date: 3/1/2019) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 108 of 576 Page 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 109 of 576 Page 7 C. Landscape Plan (date: 1/15/2019) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 110 of 576 Page 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 111 of 576 Page 9 VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development (H-2016-0060; DA Inst. No. 2017-076698; DA Inst. No. 2018-012457; H-2017- 0104; A-2018-0307). 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat by August 13, 2020, in accord with UDC 11-6B-7 in order for the preliminary plat to remain valid or a time extension may be requested. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by Sawtooth Land Surveying, LLC., stamped by Carl Porter, shall be revised as follows: a. Include all permanent water and sewer easement instrument numbers. b. Include the recorded development agreements for the property (Inst. No. 2017-076698 and 2018-012457). c. Graphically depict and include the recorded cross-access agreement numbers for properties to the east and south. d. Include Professional Land Surveyor stamp, signature and written date. e. Graphically depict Idaho Power easements adjacent to E. Overland Rd. frontage. 5. The landscape plan prepared by T-O Engineers, dated 1/15/19, included in Exhibit V.C is approved with the following comments: a. Graphically depict and revise landscape plan to include the 35-foot landscape buffer adjacent to E. Overland Rd. with vegetative groundcover where gravel is currently depicted. b. Graphically depict Idaho Power easements and revise landscape plan to include Class I trees to be installed adjacent to E. Overland Rd. in accord with UDC 11-3B-5J.1. 6. All fencing installed on the site shall be consistent with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. If permanent fencing does not exist at the subdivision boundary, temporary construction fencing to contain debris shall be installed around this phase prior to release of building permits. 7. The applicant shall record legally binding documents that state the maintenance and ownership responsibilities for the management of the development, including, but not limited to, structures, parking, common areas, and other development features, per UDC 11-4-3-27. A copy of the document(s) shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the City Engineer’s signature on final plat. 8. Prior to the issuance of any new building permit, the property shall be subdivided in accordance with the UDC. 9. Staff’s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 112 of 576 Page 10 10. The applicant and/or assigns shall have the continuing obligation to provide irrigation that meets the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-6 and to install and maintain all landscaping as set forth in UDC 11-3B-5, UDC 11-3B-13 and UDC 11-3B-14. 11. All common open space and site amenities shall be maintained by an owner's association as set forth in UDC 11-3G-3F1. 12. The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to prune all trees to a minimum height of six feet above the ground or sidewalk surface to afford greater visibility of the area. 13. The applicant has a continuing obligation to comply with the outdoor lighting provisions as set forth in UDC 11-3A-11. 14. All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be removed prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions: 1. A street light plan will be required as part of the building permit process. Type 1 streetlights are required on Overland Road. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the City's Design Standards. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. General Conditions: 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B- 14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 113 of 576 Page 11 letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non- health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 114 of 576 Page 12 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year- round source of water (MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 115 of 576 IDIAN*,----- I DAJ CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 G Project File Name/Number: H-2019-0048 Item Title: Final Order for Caven Ridge Estates West No. 2. By Lasher Enterprises, Located on the East Side of S. Meridian Rd. Approximately 1/4 South of E. Victory Rd. Meeting Notes: rte✓ I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.G. Presenter: Estimated Time for P resentation: Title of I tem - F inal Order for Caven Ridge E states West No. 2 (H-2019-0048) by L asher Enterprises, Located on the East side of S. M eridian Rd., approximately 1/4 mile S outh of E . Victory Rd. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate Order F indings/Orders 5/15/2019 E xhibit A E xhibit 5/15/2019 E xhibit B E xhibit 5/15/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/15/2019 - 3:35 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 116 of 576 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR CAVEN RIDGE ESTATES WEST SUBDIVISION NO. 2 – FP H-2019-0048 Page 1 of 3 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: MAY 7, 2019 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT CONSISTING OF 27 BUILDING LOTS AND 5 COMMON LOTS ON 6.75 ACRES OF LAND IN THE R-8 ZONING DISTRICT FOR CAVEN RIDGE ESTATES WEST SUBDIVISION NO. 2 BY: BRADY LASHER APPLICANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. H-2019-0048 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council on May 7, 2019 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of “PLAT SHOWING CAVEN RIDGE ESTATES WEST SUBDIVISION NO. 2, SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2019, HANDWRITTEN Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 117 of 576 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR CAVEN RIDGE ESTATES WEST SUBDIVISION NO. 2 – FP H-2019-0048 Page 2 of 3 DATE: 3/26/2019, by ROBERT L. KAZARINOFF, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 6,” is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated May 7, 2019, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit A” and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Wendy Shrief, J-U-B Engineers, Inc., a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit B” and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City’s requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 118 of 576 issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 21 S-� day of Mau , 2019. By: Tammy d erd Mayor, it of Meridian Attest: o�P,Eo a ucusr� o� 2 (-ity Of �IQI' ison W� Inte i lerk y SEAL Copy served upon the Applicant, Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: auaruwculDated: rJ ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR CAVEN RIDGE ESTATES WEST SUBDIVISION NO. 2 — FP H-2019-0048 Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A Page 1 HEARING DATE: May 7, 2019 (Continued from: 4/23/2019) TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Sonya Allen, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2019-0048 Caven Ridge Estates West Subdivision No. 2 LOCATION: 3935 W. Franklin Rd., in the north ½ of Section 15, T.3N., R.1W. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final Plat consisting of 27 building lots and 5 common lots on 6.75 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district for the second and final phase of Caven Ridge West Subdivision. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Brady Lasher, Lasher Enterprises – 3327 N. Eagle Rd., Meridian, ID 83646 B. Owner: AMH Development, LLC – 280 Pilot Rd., Ste. 200, Las Vegas, NV 89119 C. Representative: Wendy Shrief, JUB Engineers – 250 S. Beechwood Ave., Ste. 201, Boise, ID 83709 III. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat in accord with the requirements listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. The proposed final plat depicts two (2) fewer building lots and a greater amount of common area than shown on the approved preliminary plat. Overall, between the first and second phases, there are a total of four (4) fewer building lots and a greater amount of common area depicted on the final plats than shown on the approved preliminary STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 120 of 576 Page 2 plat. Therefore, Staff finds the subject final plat in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. IV. DECISION Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat within the conditions noted in Section VIII of this report. V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat (date: 2/5/2018) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 121 of 576 Page 3 B. Final Plat (date: 3/26/2019) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 122 of 576 Page 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 123 of 576 Page 5 C. Landscape Plan (dated: 2/15/19) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 124 of 576 Page 6 D. Common Driveway Exhibit Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 125 of 576 Page 7 VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the approved preliminary plat (H-2017-0156), development agreement (Inst. No. 2017-074871) and amended development agreement (Inst. 2018- 034521), applications approved for this site. 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the subject final plat within two years of the City Engineer’s signature on the previous phase final plat (on or before January 7, 2021), or apply for a time extension, in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by J-U-B Engineers, Inc. stamped on 3/26/2019 by Robert L. Kazarineff, shall be revised as follows: Notes: a. Note #5: “. . . without prior approval from the health authority and the City of Meridian.” b. Note #11: “. . . Development Agreement Instrument No. 2017-074871 and 2018- 034521.” Easement Notes: c. Note #5: There is no Lot 6, Block 3 – revise note accordingly. d. Note #6: A call-out appears to be missing from the face of the plat on Lot 17, Block 1 in relation to this note. 5. The landscape plan prepared by Stack Rock Group, dated 2/15/19, shall be revised as follows: a. Four (4) additional trees shall be depicted elsewhere within the development to make up for those required in the street buffer along E. Sicily Dr. where the ACHD seepage beds are located and trees can’t be provided (this calculation includes a credit for the additional tree provided along pathway 2 above that required). b. Include a detail of the sound attenuation wall that includes construction materials in accord with UDC 11-3H-4D. c. Depict a 10-foot wide multi-use pathway along S. Meridian Rd./SH-69 in accord with UDC 11-3H-4C.4 with landscaping in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C. 6. Depict a concrete pad at the end of the common driveway on Lot 26, Block 1 no more than 5 feet behind the sidewalk that is of sufficient area to accommodate the receptacles of the residences that take access from the common driveway per requirement of Republic Services unless otherwise waived by Republic Services. 7. Include the entire site on the plan sheet (the northwest corner of the site is cut off). 8. Future development of Lots 28-31, Block 1 shall comply with the common driveway exhibit in Section V.D. 9. A perpetual ingress-egress easement for the common driveway(s) proposed on Lot 26, Block 1 shall be filed with the Ada County Recorder, which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. A copy of Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 126 of 576 Page 8 the recorded easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 10. A public pedestrian easement is required to be submitted for the multi-use pathways on this site (and off-site) unless the pathway will be located within the right-of-way, in which case it should be covered under a pedestrian easement with ITD. This easement(s) shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to or concurrent with submittal of the final plat for City Engineer signature. 11. Submit a recorded easement from the adjacent property owner of Parcel #S1130234045 for a temporary Fire Department turnaround at the terminus of S. Pattern Way prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat. 12. Staff’s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions: 1. A future installation agreement and funds are required for lights on S. Meridian Road frontage. Agreement and funds shall specify (3) Type 1 lights 35' in height with a 12' mast arm. Contact the Transportation and Utility Coordinator for more information. Please correct the numbering on the submitted street light plan. 2. Please correct the dead-end run slope from 0.42% to 0.60% of the sanitary sewer mainline D, on Sheet C-402. Shorten the mainline run as much as possible, and extend service lines. 3. Temporary dead-end water mains may cause water quality issues until they are extended and connected through the Cavanaugh - Old Tanana Valley development. General Conditions: 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 127 of 576 Page 9 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non- health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 128 of 576 Page 10 lights. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42- 1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 129 of 576 From:Wendy Shrief To:Sonya Allen; Charlene Way; Chris Johnson Subject:RE: Caven Ridge Estates West Sub. 2 - FP H-2019-0048 Staff Report for May 7th Council Mtg Date:Thursday, May 2, 2019 1:36:20 PM Attachments:image007.png image013.png Sonya, We are in agreement with the staff report and we would like to request to be placed on the consent agenda. Thanks, Wendy Wendy Kirkpatrick Shrief, AICP Planner J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 250 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201, Boise, ID 83709 e wshrief@jub.com w www.jub.com p 208 376 7330 c 208 559 1760 From: Sonya Allen <sallen@meridiancity.org> Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 1:23 PM To: Charlene Way <cway@meridiancity.org>; Chris Johnson <cjohnson@meridiancity.org> Cc: Wendy Shrief <wshrief@jub.com> Subject: Caven Ridge Estates West Sub. 2 - FP H-2019-0048 Staff Report for May 7th Council Mtg [External Email] Attached is the staff report for the proposed final plat for Caven Ridge Estates West Sub. 2. This item is scheduled to be on the City Council agenda on May 7th. The hearing will be held at City Hall, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, beginning at 6:00 pm. Please call or e-mail with any questions. Wendy - Please submit a written response to the staff report to the City Clerk’s office (cityclerk@meridiancity.org) and me by 3:00 pm the Thursday prior to the meeting. If you are in agreement with the conditions of approval contained in the staff report and you submit a written response accordingly, your item will be placed on the consent agenda; consent agenda items are passed in one motion by the Council at the beginning of the meeting. Note: If you are in agreement with the staff report, it is still recommended you attend the meeting in the event the item is pulled off of the consent agenda for discussion. EXHIBIT B Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 130 of 576 If you do not respond to the staff report by Thursday at 3:00 pm, or if you have concerns with the conditions of approval, your project will be placed on the regular agenda. Thanks, Sonya Allen | Associate Planner City of Meridian | Community Development Dept. 33 E. Broadway Ave., Ste. 102, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-884-5533 | Fax: 208-489-0578 Built for Business, Designed for Living All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in regards to both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law. This e-mail and any attachments involving J-U-B or a subsidiary business may contain information that is confidential and/or proprietary. Prior to use, you agree to the provisions found on the Electronic Documents/Data License, which can be accessed from the footer on the J-U-B home page. If you believe you received this email in error, please reply to that effect and then delete all copies. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 131 of 576 EIDIANt�--- \_J CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 H Project File Name/Number: H-2019-0041 Item Title: Final Order for East Ridge No. 1 By Devco Development, LLC, Located on the North Side of E. Lake Hazel Rd., West of S. Eagle Rd. Meeting Notes: �6 V K 'k t F,� , P I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.H. Presenter: Estimated Time for P resentation: Title of I tem - F inal Order for E ast Ridge No. 1 (H-2019-0041) by Devco D evelopment, L L C, L ocated on the Nor th side of E . L ake Hazel Rd., West of S . E agle Rd. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate Order F indings/Orders 5/13/2019 E xhibit A E xhibit 5/13/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/13/2019 - 11:28 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 132 of 576 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF COUNCIL REVIEW FOR EAST RIDGE NO. 1 – MI H- 2019-0041 Page 1 of 2 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: MAY 7, 2019 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL MODIFICATION OF UDC 11-3A-6D WHICH REQUIRES IRRIGATION EASEMENTS WIDER THAN 10 FEET TO BE INCLUDED IN A COMMON LOT, FOR EAST RIDGE SUBDIVISION NO. 1. BY: C15 LLC. APPLICANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. H-2019-0041 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council on May 7, 2019 for modifications to UDC 11-3A-6D which requires irrigation easements wider than 10 feet to be included in a common lot that is a minimum of 20 feet wide and outside of a fenced area. The Applicant requests approval for the 40-foot wide Grimmett Lateral irrigation easement along the rear boundary of Lots 5-10 and a portion of Lot 11, Block 1 to remain as an easement on the buildable lots rather than be contained in a common lot. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The above named Applicant is granted a modification to UDC 11-3A-6D to locate the 40- foot wide Grimmett Lateral irrigation easement within Lots 5-10 and a portion of Lot 11, Block 1. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7, 2019 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 133 of 576 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the day of H a(A 2019. �pAUv„5/ Attest: L Q' 00, O z 1� Chris Jos n L Q Interim ' � t SEP o-1 of B: Tammy de erd Mayor, City of Meridian Copy served upon the Applicant, Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: Dated:_ 5 "G Q_0 6 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF COUNCIL REVIEW FOR EAST RIDGE NO. 1 — MI H- 2019-0041 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A Page 1 HEARING DATE: 5/7/2019 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Stephanie Leonard, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: H-2019-0041 East Ridge No. 1 (Grimmett Lateral Irrigation Easement) LOCATION: North side of E. Lake Hazel Road, west of S. Eagle Rd., in the SW ¼ of the SE ¼ of Section 32, Township 3N, Range 1E. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant has requested City Council review to allow the forty-foot (40’) irrigation easement along the rear boundary of Lots 5-10 and a portion of Lot 11, Block 1 to remain as an easement on the buildable lots rather than be contained in a common lot, in accordance with UDC 11-3A-6D. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Owner: C15 LLC. 4824 W. Fairview Ave. Boise, ID 83706 B. Representative: Laren Bailey, Devco Development 4824 W. Fairview Ave. Boise, ID 83706 STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 135 of 576 Page 2 III. NOTICING City Council Posting Date Newspaper Notification 4/19/2019 Radius notification mailed to properties within 300 feet 4/16/2019 Radius notification published on 4/26/2019 Nextdoor posting 4/16/2019 IV. STAFF ANALYSIS The applicant has applied for a modification, as allowed at a public hearing with notice to surrounding property owners, to UDC 11-3A-6D, which requires irrigation easements wider than 10-feet to be included in a common lot that is a minimum of 20-feet wide and outside of a fenced area. Due to the topography of the area several of the lots within this development have a slope easement ; the lots in question have both the slope easement as well as the Grimmett Lateral irrigation easement. Staff has received public testimony in regard to maintenance and erosion resulting from the slope easement existing within buildable lots in this development. These concerns have been echoed throughout the area and are fairly typical in this part of Meridian due to the topography of the area; similar slope easements exist in Sky Mesa and Southern Highlands, north of the subject property. Staff does recognize these concerns, however City Code does not have an adequate drainage and grading ordinance to address these issues. Although these concerns are warranted, they are not applicable to the subject application. The Grimmett Lateral easement runs along the eastern boundary of this site within a 40-foot wide prescriptive easement (see Exhibit VI.B). A condition was included in the final plat for East Ridge Estates Subdivision No. 1 (H-2018-0062) requiring the applicant to either place the irrigation easement in a common lot or seek Council waiver to include it as part of the adjacent buildable lots. T he item was discussed at the July 17, 2018 Council hearing, where it was determined the applicant would indeed seek Council waiver through the public hearing process with notice to surrounding property owners, in accord with UDC 11-3A-6D. The final plat was approved with the condition that the applicant receive Council waiver prior to receiving the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat. A staff report was submitted by the Boise Project Board of Control at the time of the preliminary plat and annexation application that indicated their preference to leave the irrigation easement unencumbered (see Exhibit VI.D). In gathering information and analyzing the subject application, Staff contacted the Boise Project Board of Control and was informed that the irrigation district does not want any portion of the 40-foot irrigation easement to be located within building lots. Additionally, the irrigation district does not support groundcover outside of grass or gravel within the easement. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 136 of 576 Page 3 The applicant’s request for Council waiver is shown below: Staff is in agreement with the applicant’s first statement and believes the concern can be mitigated by creating visibility into the 40-foot common lot. Staff recommends open vision fencing up to six feet in height be required along the rear of Lots 5-11, Block 1 in accord with the standards in UDC 11-3A-7A- 7b(1). Additionally, the easement is located adjacent to an existing single-family residence in Ada County with open-vision fencing installed along the perimeter of the property, which will add visibility to the area. Future redevelopment of the parcel to the east could also incorporate open space along the subject easement and might provide an opportunity to locate an amenity within the space and could potentially provide future connectivity (see Exhibit VI.E). In regard to the applicant’s next two points, the 40-foot easement would not be permitted to be improved per the Boise Project Board of Control’s recommendation; this request would be easier to enforce if maintained by the subdivision’s HOA. The irrigation easement does lie within an overlying slope easement on several of the lots, but is not within the slope easement on three (3) of the southern lots. Placing the irrigation easement within the buildable lots would prevent homeowners from utilizing the space as the irrigation district requires the easement be easily accessible and unimproved. Given the above information and considering input from the Boise Project Board of Control, Staff finds the best location for the easement is within a common lot in accord with UDC 11-3A-6D. Location of the easement within a common lot will provide an easily accessible easement for the irrigation district and will ensure that future residents will not be responsible for maintaining an unusable 40-foot easement at the rear of their property. Locating the easement within a common lot may also prevent potential code enforcement issues and/or irrigation district requirements incurred to homeowners. Staff recommends that the applicant locate the irrigation easement within a common lot and obtain approval of a final plat modification prior to City Engineer’s signature on the final plat. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted with the final plat modification and shall be landscaped in accord with the Boise Project Board of Control’s landscaping requirements. V. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends the 40-foot Grimmett Lateral irrigation easement be placed within a common lot to be owned and maintained by the East Ridge Estates homeowner’s association. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 137 of 576 Page 4 VI. EXHIBITS A. Vicinity Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 138 of 576 Page 5 B. Aerial View Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 139 of 576 Page 6 C. Preliminary Plat (date: 3/1/2019) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 140 of 576 Page 7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 141 of 576 Page 8 D. Staff Report from Boise Project Control (dated: October 6, 2017) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 142 of 576 Page 9 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 143 of 576 Page 10 E. Site Photos Graded area toward south of site (approximately Lots 5-7, Block 1) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 144 of 576 Page 11 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 145 of 576 Page 12 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 146 of 576 Page 13 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 147 of 576 �/rE IDIZ IANh-- �J CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 I Project File Name/Number: H-2019-0043 Item Title: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Knighthill Center Subdivision By JRW Construction, Located at 6343 N. Linder Rd. Meeting Notes: Dst I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.I . Presenter: Estimated Time for P resentation: Title of I tem - F indings of F act, C onclusions of L aw for K nighthill C enter Subdivision (H- 2019-0043) by J RW C onstruction, L ocated at 6343 N. L inder Rd. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate F indings F indings/Orders 5/13/2019 E xhibit A E xhibit 5/13/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/13/2019 - 11:23 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 148 of 576 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2019-0043 - 1 - CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Short Plat to Create Two (2) Buildable Lots on 1.61 acres of land in the C-G zoning district, by JRW Construction. Case No(s). H-2019-0043 For the City Council Hearing Date of: May 7, 2019 (Findings on May 21, 2019) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7, 2019, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7, 2019, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7, 2019, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7, 2019, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the “Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,” codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted April 19, 2011, Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7, 2019, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 149 of 576 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2019-0043 - 2 - reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council’s authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant’s request for Short Plat is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7, 2019, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Short Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer’s signature on the final plat within two (2) years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat (UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two (2) years, may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval (UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A, the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat not to exceed two (2) years. Additional time extensions up to two (2) years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions, the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension, the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again (UDC 11- 6B-7C). E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7, 2019 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 150 of 576 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the day of M a , 2019. COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOE BORTON VOTED A �n COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER TY PALMER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER TREG BERNT VOTED_n COUNCIL MEMBER GENESIS MILAM VOTED N,0 MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD VOTED (TIE BREAKER) s Mayor Tamm d Weerd � -0 t�uc;vsT`\ Attest: o� � z E��IV1AN+� IDAHO is J on t LL Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By:LPDated: "oma I ' pl� I City Clerk's Office CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2019-0043 - 3 - Knigv4h; l l EXHIBIT A Page 1 HEARING DATE: 5/7/2019 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Stephanie Leonard, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2019-0043 Knighthill Center Subdivision No. 3 LOCATION: 6343 N. Linder Road, in the NE ¼ of the NE ¼ of Section 26, Township 4N, Range 1W. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant has applied for a short plat (SHP) to divide one (1) building lot in an existing commercial subdivision into two (2) building lots on 1.61 acres of land in the C-G zoning district. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: JRW Construction 1676 N. Claredon Way Eagle, ID 83616 B. Owner: Knighthill, LLC. 1676 N. Clarendon Way Eagle, ID 83616 C. Representative: Mason and Associates, Inc. 924 3rd Street South, Site B Nampa, ID 83651 STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 152 of 576 Page 2 III. NOTICING City Council Posting Date Newspaper Notification 4/19/2019 Radius notification mailed to properties within 300 feet 4/16/2019 Nextdoor posting 4/16/2019 IV. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed short plat creates two (2) building lots from one (1) existing building lot on 1.61 acres of land in the Knighthill Center subdivision in the C-G zoning district. The proposed plat is a re- subdivision of Lot 5, Block 1 of the Knighthill Center subdivision to create one (1) 0.61-acre parcel and one (1) 1-acre parcel. Staff has reviewed the proposed short plat for substantial compliance with the criteria set forth in UDC 11-6B-5 and deems the short plat to be in substantial compliance with said requirements. Required landscape street buffers and a 10-foot multi-use pathway were installed in conformance with UDC standards with final plat approval of the Knighthill Center Subdivision. V. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed short plat and within the conditions noted in Section VII of this report. B. Council The Meridian City Council heard these items on May 7, 2019. At the public hearing, the Council approved the subject short plat request. a. Summary of City Council Public Hearing: i. In favor: Renny Wylie, Applicant ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Renny Wylie, Applicant iv. Written testimony: None v. Staff presenting application: Stephanie Leonard vi. Other staff commenting on application: None b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony: i. None c. Key Issues of Discussion by Council: i. None d. Key Council Changes to Staff Recommendation i. None Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 153 of 576 Page 3 VI. EXHIBITS A. Knighthill Center Subdivision (dated: 2/13/15) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 154 of 576 Page 4 B. Proposed Short Plat (date: 3/11/2019) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 155 of 576 Page 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 156 of 576 Page 6 VII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development (AZ-06-006, PP-13-031; FP-14-020; MDA-13-019, DA #114014784). 2. Except for the access points approved by the Knighthill Center Subdivision, direct access to W. Chinden Blvd. and N. Linder Road is prohibited. 3. If the City Engineer’s signature has not been obtained within two (2) years of the City Council’s approval of the short plat, the short plat shall become null and void unless a time extension is obtained, per UDC 11-6B-7. 4. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized, as well as the signatures of the Ada County Highway District and the Central District Health Department. 5. Development of any lot shall require submission of Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review per UDC-11-5B-1 and shall meet all applicable requirements of City of Meridian code. 6. The short plat prepared by Mason & Associates by Darin Holzhey, included in Section VI.B shall be revised as follows: a. Note #6: Replace “isle” with correct spelling of “aisle”. 7. Staff’s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions: 1. No new public sewer or water infrastructure is being planned as part of this project; therefore, Public Works has no comment. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 157 of 576 Page 7 VIII. FINDINGS In consideration of a short plat, the decision-making body shall make the following findings: A. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the Unified Development Code; The proposed short plat complies with the Comprehensive Plan and has been developed in accord with UDC standards. B. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Council finds that public services are adequate to serve the site. C. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City’s capital improvements program; The Council finds that the development will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. All required utilities are being provided with the development of the property at the developer’s expense. D. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Council finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing supporting services. The developer and/or future lot owner(s) will finance the extension of sewer, water, utilities and pressurized irrigation to serve the project. E. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The Council finds the proposed short plat will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. F. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The Council is not aware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features associated with the development of this site. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 158 of 576 CIDIAN*,----- �WlIZI DAJ CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 J Project File Name/Number: H-2018-0129 Item Title: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Stapleton Subdivision By Stapleton, LLC., Located at the SW Corner of S. Meridian Rd/SH69 and W. Harris St. Meeting Notes: Yr I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.J . Presenter: Estimated Time for P resentation: Title of I tem - F indings of F act, C onclusions of L aw for S tapleton Subdivision (H-2018-0129) by Stapleton, L L C , L ocated at the S W corner of S . M eridian Rd./S H 69 and W. Harris St. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate F indings F indings/Orders 5/16/2019 E xhibit A E xhibit 5/16/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/16/2019 - 7:53 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 159 of 576 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2018-0129 - 1 - CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Annexation and Zoning of 38.15 Acres of Land with an R-15 Zoning District; and Preliminary Plat consisting of (212) Single-Family Residential Building Lots, (1) Multi-Family Building Lot and (22) Common Lots on 35.67 Acres of Land in the R-15 Zoning District for Stapleton Subdivision, by Stapleton, LLC. Case No(s). H-2018-0129 For the City Council Hearing Date of: May 7, 2019 (Findings on May 21, 2019) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7, 2019, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7, 2019, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7, 2019, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7, 2019, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the “Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,” codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted April 19, 2011, Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 160 of 576 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2018-0129 - 2 - 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7, 2019, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council’s authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant’s request for annexation & zoning and preliminary plat is hereby approved with the requirement of a Development Agreement per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7, 2019, attached as Exhibit A. 2. The City Council approved a modification to UDC 11-3H-4B.2 to allow a new access via SH- 69; and vacated the applicant’s request for a Variance due to the Idaho Transportation Department’s approval of the proposed access via SH-69 in accord with UDC 11-3H-3. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer’s signature on the final plat within two (2) years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat (UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two (2) years, may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval (UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A, the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat not to exceed two (2) years. Additional time extensions up to two (2) years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions, the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension, the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again (UDC 11- 6B-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 161 of 576 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2018-0129 - 3 - agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six (6) months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six (6) month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of May 7, 2019. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 162 of 576 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 21 ` day of Q , 2019. COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER VOTED�C,� COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER TY PALMER VOTED \ COUNCIL MEMBER TREG BERNT VOTED—A p OTEDMCOUNCIL MEMBER GENESIS MILAM VOTED- MAYOR AYOR TAMMY de WEERD VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Tat!d eerd �P-�ED AUGUsr Attest: Q° 2 City of IDAHO Chri .SOU/ k,-4, SEAL Interim City �k� Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: 0Dated: Gj a' -, 49 City Clerk's Office CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2018-0129 -4- 5 4- 5 aoe4on EXHIBIT A Page 1 HEARING DATE: May 7, 2019 (Continued from April 2, 2019) TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Sonya Allen, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2018-0129 Stapleton Subdivision LOCATION: 4435 S. Meridian Road I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION NOTE: During the processing of this application, City staff had not receive ITD’s formal recommendation for the access to SH 69 and a variance application was submitted concurrently with the annexation and preliminary plat application. After the project was scheduled for the Commission hearing, the TIS submitted with the application corroborated the need for the access to SH 69 based on the trips generated by the proposed development. Further, the study confirmed the proposed access point would receive ITD approval. Based on this information, it has been determined by City staff that a variance application is no longer warranted however, the decision of the access is the City Council’s discretion in accord with UDC 11-3H-3. Because the variance is not required, staff recommends that the Council acknowledge the vacate the variance from the agenda before acting on this application. Further, the staff report has been updated in a strike-through format removing any references to the variance commentary. A UDC Text Amendment is currently in process to remove the access to highways for the variance section in Chapter 5 to avoid this confusion moving forward. Annexation and zoning of 38.15 acres of land with an R-15 zoning district; Preliminary plat consisting of (212) single-family residential building lots, (1) multi-family building lot and (22) common lots on 35.67 acres of land in the R-15 zoning district; and Variance to UDC 11-3H-4B for access to State Highway 69/S. Meridian Rd. STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 164 of 576 Page 2 II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Acreage 35.67 Future Land Use Designation MU-R (Mixed Use – Regional) Existing Land Use Existing home & accessory structures (vacant) Proposed Land Use(s) Residential (SFR & MFR) Current Zoning RUT in Ada County Proposed Zoning R-15 Lots (# and type; bldg/common) 213 building/22 common Phasing plan (# of phases) Yes; 5 phases Number of Residential Units (type of units) 240 units total (96 attached/116 detached SFR, 28 MFR) Density (gross & net) 6.73 gross Open Space (acres, total [%] / buffer / qualified) 5.43 acres (15.2%) Amenities Basketball court, dog park for small dogs, 24’ x 36’ children’s play structure, swings, rock climbing boulders and a climbing dome structure, big wheel track, benches, pedestrian pathways, segment of multi-use pathway system. Physical Features (waterways, hazards, flood plain, hillside) An irrigation ditch runs along the northeast corner of the site, the Carlson Lateral runs along the west boundary of the site, and the Northwest gas pipeline runs along the southwest corner of the site. The topography of this site slopes considerably down on the northeast portion of the site. Neighborhood meeting date; # of attendees: July 18, 2018; 6 attendees January 16, 2019; 3 attendees History (previous approvals) CPA-08-001 (amendment to the Comprehensive Plan FLUM to change the land use designation from MDR to MU-R - approved); AZ-08-005 (a Development Agreement was required as a provision of annexation – the DA was never signed, therefore the annexation approval is null and void); VAR-08-008 (approved 3 access points to SH 69/S. Meridian Rd. – this approval has since expired because the property was never annexed); MDA-11-010 (modification to the DA to extend the time period allow for the agreement to be signed – the DA was never signed and expired) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 165 of 576 Page 3 Description Details Pa ge Ada County Highway District Staff report (yes/no) Yes (draft) – see Section VII. Requires ACHD Commission Action (yes/no) Yes, for modification to Master Street Map for collector street Fire Service Distance to Fire Station 2.9 miles from Fire Station #1 Fire Response Time 5 minutes under ideal conditions Resource Reliability 63% from Fire Station #1 – does not meet the target goal of 85% or greater Risk Identificatio n 1 (residential) Accessibility signage for addressing needs to be provided for homes accessed by the common driveways on Lots 10 & 61, Block 1; Lots 23 & 29, Block 2; and Lot 28, Block 3 Special/reso urce needs None Water Supply Requires 1,000 gallons per minute for 2 hours Other Resources NA Police Service Distance to Police Station 3.5 miles Police Response Time 3-4 minutes Calls for Service 104 within a mile of the site between 1/1/18-12/31/18 Accessibility Harris St. and SH-69; future stub to south Specialty/res ource needs No additional staffing, equipment needs or other resources needed to serve this development Crimes Crashes 12 crashes within a mile of the site – 66% injury related between 1/1/18 and 12/31/18 West Ada School District Distance (elem, ms, hs) Mary McPherson Elementary – 1 mile; Victory Middle School – 1.6 miles; Meridian High School – 4.4 miles Capacity of Schools Mary McPherson Elementary 650; Victory Middle School 1,000; Meridian High School 2,400 # of Students Enrolled Mary McPherson Elementary 525; Victory Middle Schoo l 928; Meridian High School 1,913 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 166 of 576 Page 4 C. Project Area Maps Anticipated school aged children generated by this development 178 Wastewater Distance to Sewer Services 200-feet, Bore under Meridian Road Sewer Shed NA Estimated Project Sewer ERU’s See application information WRRF Declining Balance 13.57 MGD Project Consistent with WW Master Plan/Facility Plan Yes Water Distance to Water Services 0-feet Pressure Zone 5 Estimated Project Water ERU’s See application information Water Quality None Project Consistent with Water Master Plan Yes Impacts/Con cerns Each phase must be modeled as developed to ensure adequate fire flow. If a transportation/pathway connection is built to the west (proposed Graycliff Apartments), a water main connection shall be required under said connection. Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 167 of 576 Page 5 III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Stapleton, LLC – 4824 W. Fairview Ave., Boise, ID 83706 B. Owner: GRHH Amity, LLC – 855 Broad St., Ste. 300, Boise, ID 83702 C. Representative: Laren Bailey, Stapleton, LLC – 4824 W. Fairview Ave., Boise, ID 83706 Zoning Map Planned Development Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 168 of 576 Page 6 IV. NOTICING Planning & Zoning Posting Date City Council Posting Date Newspaper Notification 12/28/2018 Radius notification mailed to properties within 300 feet 12/26/2018 Public hearing notice sign posted on site 1/4/2019 Nextdoor posting 12/26/2018 V. STAFF ANALYSIS A. ANNEXATION & ZONING Comprehensive Plan (https://www.meridiancity.org/compplan): The Future Land Use Designation (FLUM) for this site is Mixed Use – Regional (MU-R) – The purpose of this designation is to provide a mix of employment, retail, and residential dwellings and public uses near major arterial intersections. The intent is to integrate a variety of uses together, including residential, and to avoid predominantly single-use developments such as a regional retail center with only restaurants and other commercial uses. Developments should be anchored by uses that have a regional draw with the appropriate supporting uses. MU-R developments are encouraged to be designed according the MU-R plan depicted in Figure 3-5 below: Transportation: The Master Street Map (MSM) depicts a planned north/south collector street through and along the west boundary of the site from W. Harris St. to W. Amity Rd. (see blue and orange dashed line on map below). Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 169 of 576 Page 7 The collector street designation was placed on this property because of the Comprehensive Plan amendment to the FLUM approved in 2008 which changed the land use designation on this property and the property to the south to MU-R. Because of the intensity of uses (i.e. commercial, office and multi-family residential – see concept plan below) planned with the associated development, there was a need to disperse traffic to the signals at Amity Rd. and Meridian Rd./SH-69 and the future signal at Harris St. and Meridian Rd./SH-69. This street was intended to serve as a backage road for the commercial development along SH-69. However, the property was never annexed and the property was not developed as intended. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 170 of 576 Page 8 The proposed plat depicts a short segment (400’+/-) of the collector street (N. Lone Pine Way) from W. Harris St. to the intersection of W. Radiant Edge Dr.; and W. Lyra St. from SH-69 and S. Solaris Ave. to the south; a continuous collector street is not proposed through the site therefore, the proposed street network is not consistent with the MSM. However, ACHD is of the opinion the proposal to construct two discontinuous collector streets meets the intent of the MSM and doesn’t preclude the construction of the southern segment in the future. The Applicant is requesting a modification to the MSM to eliminate the continuous collector street through this site to better reflect the proposed land uses. With development applications to the west of this site, a north/south collector street from Harris to Amity is required to be constructed at the half mile in accord with the MSM. Land Use: The proposed land use for this site is a mix of single-family residential attached and detached units (212 units) with a small portion of multi-family 4-plex units (28 units) at an overall gross density of 6.73 units per acre. This land is part of a larger Mixed Use designated area in this vicinity. The MU-R designation stretches along the frontage of SH-69 from W. Harris St. to W. Amity Rd. with MU-C (Mixed Use – Community) to the south across Amity; MU-NR (Mixed Use – Non-Residential) designated land exists to the east across SH-69 and south of Amity (see FLUM below). The Applicant submitted a bubble plan included in Section VII.G that demonstrates how the property owner to the south of this site anticipates that property developing with a mix of uses consisting of office/multi-family residential as a buffer and transition to the single-family residential planned on this site with commercial, office and retail uses further to the south. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 171 of 576 Page 9 Comprehensive Plan Policies (https://www.meridiancity.org/compplan): Goals, Objectives, & Action Items: Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this application and apply to the proposed use of this property (staff analysis in italics): “Provide for a wide diversity of housing types (single-family, modular, mobile homes and multi-family arrangements) and choices between ownership and rental dwelling units for all income groups in a variety of locations suitable for residential development.” (3.07.03B) A mix of single-family attached and detached homes and multi-family apartment units are proposed within this development which will provided ownership and rental options for various income groups in this area. “Provide housing options close to employment and shopping centers.” (3.07.02D) The proposed development will provide housing options in close proximity to future office and commercial uses planned to develop on the adjacent property to the south. “Locate high-density development, where possible, near open space corridors or other permanent major open space and park facilities, Old Town, and near major access thoroughfares.” (3.07.02L) The proposed development falls within the medium-density category. The site is located in close proximity to a future City park to the west and an existing City Park (Bear Creek) to the north and a segment of the City’s multi-use pathway system to the west and along SH-69, a major access thoroughfare. For this reason, Staff is of the opinion a higher density would be more appropriate in this area; however, the proposed density is higher than the adjacent residential developments to the north and west and although at the low end, it falls within the desired density range of 6 to 40 units per acre in mixed use designated areas. “Consider ACHD’s Master Street Map (MSM) in all land use decisions.” (3.03.04K) The MSM depicts a north/south collector roadway across this site providing access between W. Harris St. and W. Amity Rd. and to the future signal at Harris St./SH-69 and the existing signal at Amity/SH-69. The proposed plan depicts a 400+/- foot long segment of a collector street (N. Lone Pine Way) at the entry of the development from Harris St. and a 225+/- foot long segment of a collector street (S. Solaris Ave.) at the south boundary with local streets in between that do not provide a direct connection between Harris and Amity which is not consistent with the MSM. However, because the development plan for this site and the property to the south has changed from that previously proposed which warranted the provision of a collector street in this area and because ACHD has approved the proposed street layout/designations, Staff is amenable to the proposed design without the provision of a full collector street. “Require open space areas within all development.” (6.01.01A) An open space exhibit is included in Section VII.D that appears to comply with the minimum UDC standards although some of the areas (as noted) do not count toward qualified open space per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3. “Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is contiguous to the City.” (3.01.01F) The proposed development is contiguous to the City and urban services can be provided to this development. “Restrict private curb cuts and access points on collectors and arterial streets.” (3.06.02D) One (1) access is proposed via W. Harris St., a collector street; and one (1) access is proposed via SH-69, a state highway. Access via SH-69 is prohibited per UDC 11-3H-4B; a Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 172 of 576 Page 10 variance is requested for Council approval of the proposed access. Note: Without access via SH-69, a secondary emergency access is required that meets Fire Department requirements (IFC Section D104.3). “Work with ACHD, COMPASS, and VRT on bringing public transportation to and through Meridian.” (3.03.04H) The Applicant contacted VRT to see if a bus stop is needed on this site; VRT stated their long- term plan (ValleyConnect 2.0) does not include any service along S. Meridian Rd./SH-69. “Require pedestrian access connectors in all new development to link subdivisions together to promote neighborhood connectivity as part of a community pathway system.” (3.03.03B) A segment of the City’s multi-use pathway system is proposed at the southwest corner of the site which will assist in providing connectivity with adjacent developments and the future City Park to the west. Pedestrian access connectors are provided internally to the sidewalks along Harris St. and the multi-use pathway along SH-69. One other pedestrian connection is proposed to the west on Lot 26, Block 3 which also serves as the access driveway to a new pressure irrigation pump station and an existing irrigation diversion structure. “Work with transportation agencies and private property owners to preserve transportation corridors, future transit routes and infrastructure, road and highway extensions, and to facilitate access management planning.” (3.01.01J) The Applicant has been working with ITD on the proposed access via SH-69 and with ACHD on the proposed access via W. Harris St. and internal roadways. The UDC (11-3H-4) prohibits new approaches to state highways; a Variance is requested for the proposed access. Staff finds approving the access via SH-69 does not preserve the transportation corridor. “Develop alternative modes of transportation through pedestrian improvements, bicycle lanes, off-street pathways, and transit-oriented development as appropriate.” (3.03.03D) VRT (ValleyConnect 2.0) does not have any bus service along S. Meridian Rd./SH-69. A 10- foot wide multi-use pathway is required as proposed along SH-69 and across the southwest corner of this site within the Northwest Pipeline easement for pedestrian/bicycle use. In reviewing development applications, the following items will be considered in all Mixed Use areas, per the Comprehensive Plan (pgs. 23-24): (Staff’s analysis in italics) • “Residential densities should be a minimum of six dwellings/acre.” The gross density of the proposed development is 6.73 units per acre which falls at the low end of the 6 to 40 unit per acre range desired in MU-R designated areas but is within the desired range. Higher residential densities are anticipated on the R-40 zoned property to the west. • “Where feasible, higher density and/or multi-family residential development will be encouraged, especially for projects with the potential to serve as employment destination centers and when the project is adjacent to US 20/26, SH-55, SH-16 or SH-69.” Although the proposed development does include a multi-family component and meets the minimum density desired in mixed use areas, because this site is adjacent to a major transportation corridor (SH-69) and within a mile and a half of a mobility corridor (Lake Hazel Rd.), AND is designated on the FLUM as MU-R in which large employment and retail uses with a regional draw are anticipated, Staff is of the opinion a higher density and/or more multi-family units would be appropriate in this area to support the future commercial/office/employment uses desired in this area. • “A conceptual site plan for the entire mixed-use area should be included in the application.” Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 173 of 576 Page 11 A bubble plan was submitted for the overall MU-R area (see Section VII.G); however, only the northern 36+/- acre portion of that area is included in this application, the remaining 30+/- acres is not a part of this application and therefore future development cannot be held to the plan. Without both properties developing together, staff believes that the projects may not be as well-intregrated as desired by the Comprehensive Plan. • “In developments where multiple commercial and/or office buildings are proposed (not residential), the buildings should be arranged to create some form of common, usable area, such as a plaza or green space.” This development does not contain commercial/office buildings. • “The site plan should depict a transitional use and/or landscaped buffering between commercial and existing low- or medium-density residential development.” The proposed plan depicts multi-family 4-plex residential uses as a transitional use between the planned multi-family apartments to the west and the proposed single-family residential units in this development. Common area with landscaping and a multi-use pathway is proposed along the southern boundary providing a transition to planned office/multi-family uses on the adjacent property to the south. • “A mixed-use project should include at least three types of land uses [i.e. commercial (includes retail, restaurants, etc.), office, residential, civic (includes public open space, parks, entertainment venues, etc.), and industrial]. Exceptions may be granted for smaller sites on a case-by-case basis.” The proposed development plan only includes one land use type (i.e. residential); however, three different types of residential units are proposed (i.e. single-family detached/attached and multi-family 4-plex units). The concept plan submitted for the off-site MU-R designated area to the south depicts a mix of land use types as desired (i.e. office, multi-family, commercial, retail). Because the adjacent mixed use designated area to the east does not allow new residential uses, Staff is of the opinion all residential uses on this site is appropriate in order to serve the future commercial/office/employment uses. • “Community-serving facilities such as hospitals, churches, schools, parks, daycares, civic buildings, or public safety facilities are expected in larger mixed-use developments.” This is a relatively small portion of the overall mixed use designated area; none of these types of uses are proposed on this site. However, they may be in the future on the adjacent larger portions of the mixed use area. • “Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks, plazas, outdoor gathering areas, open space, libraries, and schools are expected; outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count.” The proposed plan does not incorporate public and/or quasi-public spaces and places; the common area proposed in the residential development is owned by the Homeowner’s Association and does not satisfy this requirement. These types of public spaces should be included in the adjacent mixed use designated area when it develops. • “All mixed-use projects should be directly accessible to neighborhoods within the section by both vehicles and pedestrians.” The only neighborhood that would be directly accessible to the proposed development is the future multi-family development to the west. A couple of pedestrian connections are proposed but no vehicular connections are proposed. In order to comply with this guideline, a vehicular connection should be provided. • “Street sections consistent with the Ada County Highway District Master Street Map are required within the Unified Development Code.” Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 174 of 576 Page 12 The Master Street Map depicts a north/south collector street through and along the west boundary of this site providing access to W. Harris St. and W. Amity Rd. and the traffic signals (planned and existing) at the SH-69 intersections of those streets. The proposed plan does not depict a continuous collector street as planned and therefore is not in compliance with the MSM and UDC 11-6C-3B.1, which requires arterial and collector streets as shown on the Comprehensive Plan to be dedicated to the public in all cases. However, because the development plan has changed for this area, the collector street may not be needed. • “Because of the existing small lots within Old Town, development is not subject to the Mixed-Use standards listed herein.” The proposed development is not within Old Town; therefore, this provision is not applicable. In reviewing development applications, the following items will be considered in MU-R areas, per the Comprehensive Plan (pg. 30): • “Development should comply with the general guidelines for development in all Mixed-Use areas.” See analysis above. • “Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 10% of the development area at densities ranging from 6 to 40 units/acre.” The proposed residential uses on this site comprise approximately 55% of the overall MU-R area at a density of 6.73 units per acre in accord with this guideline. • “Retail commercial uses should comprise a maximum of 50% of the development area.” No retail commercial uses are proposed with this development; however, the remainder of the area to the south consists of approximately 45% of the overall MU-R area and is planned to develop with a mix of commercial, retail, and office uses in accord with this standard. • “There is neither a minimum nor a maximum imposed on non-retail commercial uses such as office, clean industry, or entertainment uses.” No commercial uses are proposed with this development. Zoning: Based on the analysis above, Staff is of the opinion the requested annexation with the R-15 zoning district and proposed development is generally consistent with the MU-R FLUM designation for this site and is appropriate for this site. The proposed annexation area is contiguous to City annexed property to the north and west and is within the Area of City Impact Boundary. A legal description for the annexation area is included in Section VII.A. The City may require a development agreement (DA) in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. In order to ensure the site develops as proposed with this application, staff recommends a DA as a provision of annexation with the provisions included in Section VIII. B. PRELIMINARY PLAT Boundary of the Plat: The proposed boundary of the plat is not consistent with the existing boundary of the site. The Applicant intends to apply for a property boundary adjustment in the County prior to annexation ordinance approval by City Council if the subject application is approved. Final Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 175 of 576 Page 13 approval of the property boundary adjustment will need to be obtained prior to annexation ordinance approval. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There is an existing home and accessory structures on this site that is unoccupied. These structures are required to be removed prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Proposed Use Analysis: The proposed single-family dwellings (attached & detached) are listed as a principal permitted use; and the multi-family development is listed as a conditional use in the R-15 zoning district per UDC Table 11-2A-2. Multi-family developments are subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27; compliance with these standards will be evaluated in the future through the conditional use permit process. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The proposed plat and subsequent development is required to comply with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7 for the R-15 district (see below). The front lot dimension is missing on lots in Block 1 and should be included on a revised plat. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 176 of 576 Page 14 Phasing Plan: The subdivision is proposed to develop in 5 phases. The 1st phase is dependent upon a Variance being approved by Council for access via SH-69, the second phase will have access via W. Harris St. followed by the 3rd phase at the corner of Harris/SH-69, and 4th phase directly west of phase 1; the 5th phase will be the multi-family development. Because the UDC prohibits access via SH-69, Staff recommends the phasing plan is revised to reflect the first phase of development adjacent to Harris St. for access purposes; if Council approves the requested Variance, the phasing plan does not need to be revised. Per the Applicant’s narrative, the following improvements are proposed with each phase: Phase 1: The SH-69/S. Meridian Rd. roadway improvements, 10-foot wide multi-use pathway and street buffer landscaping along the full length of the project boundary along SH- 69/S. Meridian Rd. Phase 2: The W. Harris St. roadway improvements including curb, gutter and detached sidewalk and street buffer landscaping along the full length of the project boundary along W. Harris St.; and installation of the traffic signal at the W. Harris St./SH-69 intersection. Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy in each of these phases the associated improvements as proposed by the Appliant should be complete. If Council doesn’t approve the variance for access via SH-69, the Harris St. improvements, including the traffic signal at Harris/SH-69, should be completed with the first phase of development. Access (UDC 11-3A-3, 11-3H-4)/Streets: One full access is proposed via W. Harris St., a collector street; one full access is proposed via SH-69, a state highway (although ITD has only tentatively approved a right-in/right-out/left-in access); and a stub street is proposed to the south for future extension. The access via SH-69 is prohibited per UDC 11-3H-4B; a variance is requested for this access (if the access isn’t approved, it should be removed from the plat and a secondary emergency access provided in accord with IFC requirements). Improvements are required to Harris St. per the ACHD report; and SH-69 per ITD’s letter to the City (see Section VIII). ACHD is requiring bulb-outs to be constructed to reduce traffic speed and enhance pedestrian safety at crossings where internal pathways intersect the street on Radiant Ridge Dr., W. Hydman St. and at the intersection of Springfield Ave. and Broyhill St. Common Driveways (UDC 11-6C-3) All common driveways are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. Several common driveways are proposed that comply with UDC standards. Common driveways should be a maximum of 150’ in length or less, unless otherwise approved by the Fire Dept. An exhibit is required to be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks, fencing, building envelope and orientation of the lots and structures. Driveways for abutting properties that aren’t taking access from the common driveway(s) should be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line away from the common driveway. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited unless separated by a minimum 5-foot wide landscaped buffer. A perpetual ingress/egress easement for the common driveway(s) is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. A copy of the easement should be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 177 of 576 Page 15 Parking (UDC 11-3C): Parking for single-family detached/attached and multi-family dwellings is required based on the number of bedrooms per unit. For 2-, 3- or 4-bedroom single-family units, a minimum of 4 spaces are required per unit with at least 2 of those in an enclosed garage, the other spaces may be enclosed or a minimum 10’ x 20’ parking pad. Because of the narrow lots (i.e. 32’+) for detached homes and associated driveways, there is not adequate room for on-street parking in front of those lots for guest parking and in some areas parking is quite a ways away. Where attached homes are proposed, there is room for approximately one space per every 2 lots for on-street parking. On-street parking is also available adjacent to common lots. The Applicant has submitted an exhibit included in Section VII.E that demonstrates available on-street parking for the development which amounts to 109+/- spaces available for guest parking (note: parking on the 27’ wide street section adjacent to Lot 12, Block 2 can only be accommodated on one side per Fire Department standards). For a 1-bedroom multi-family unit, a minimum of 1.5 spaces per unit with an least 1 space in a covered carport or garage; for 2- or 3-bedroom multi-family units, a minimum of 2 spaces per unit are required with at least 1 in a covered carport or garage. For greater number of bedrooms, see UDC Table 11-3C-6 for more information. Pathways (UDC 11-3A-8): Pathways (micro-pathways and multi-use pathways) are required to be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8 with landscaping on either side of the pathway(s) in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C. Several micro-pathways are proposed for pedestrian circulation within the development. A segment of the City’s multi-use pathway is proposed within the Northwest Pipeline corridor across the southwest corner of the site in accord with the Pathways Master Plan; and within the street buffer along SH-69 in accord with UDC 11-3H-4C.3. Landscaping is required to be installed along these pathways as set forth in UDC 11-3B-12C. A public use easement is required for the multi-use pathways; coordinate the details of the easement with Kim Warren, Park’s Department (208-888-3579). Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): Sidewalks are required to be constructed adjacent to public streets as set forth in UDC 11-3A-17. Minimum 5-foot wide detached sidewalks are required along all collector and arterial streets; and minimum 5-foot wide attached (or detached) sidewalks are required along local streets as proposed. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-17): Parkways are required to be constructed and landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11 -3A- 17E. Eight-foot wide parkways are proposed along collector streets and along certain local street sections within the development in accord with UDC standards. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): Street buffer landscaping is required to be provided within common lots in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. Per UDC Table 11-2A-7, a 20-foot wide buffer is required adjacent to collector streets; a 35-foot wide buffer is required adjacent to SH-69, an entryway corridor; and no buffer is required along local streets. The landscape plan depicts the gravel symbol within the street buffer along SH-69 and Harris St. where vegetative groundcover is required; the symbol should be changed to grass. Qualified Open Space (UDC 11-3G): A minimum of 10% (3.57 acres) qualified open space is required to be provided within the development per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B. A qualified open space exhibit was Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 178 of 576 Page 16 submitted as shown in Section VII.D that depicts 5.43 acres (or 15.2%) of open space; however, there are several areas counted that Staff finds do not meet the requirements for qualified open space and other space that is marginal (i.e. the landscaped area on Lot 30, Block 4 that is below the dimensions of 50’ x 100’; and the area at the northeast corner of the site where the topography of the land slopes significantly down from the building lots toward the SH-69/Harris intersection and although is accessible by all residents, will not likely provide much of a benefit to homeowners. Staff requests a revised exhibit is submitted excluding certain non-qualified areas as detailed in Section VII.D prior to the Commission hearing to determine accurate qualified open space calculations. Qualified Site Amenities (UDC 11-3G): A minimum of (2) qualified site amenities are required to be provided for this development based on the size of the development (i.e. 35.67 acres). The Applicant proposes a segment of the City’s multi-use pathway system within the Northwest Pipeline corridor at the southwest corner of the site; a multi-use pathway within the street buffer along SH-69; a centrally located half-acre park with children’s play structures consisting of a 24’ x 36’ play structure, swings, climbing dome, rock climbing boulders, basketball court, big wheel track, and seating area with 4’ tall wrought iron fencing with a gated entry surrounding the park for children’s safety; and a dog park for small dogs with seating areas. The proposed amenities comply with and exceed the minimum standards. In order for the dog park to count as a “qualified” site amenity, it needs to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3C.1h which require a dog washing station with drain to sanitary sewer system and trash receptacles and bags for dog waste disposal. Waterways (UDC 11-3A-6): The Carlson Lateral runs along the western boundary of this site and has been piped. An irrigation ditch crosses the northeast corner of this site and if open, should be piped in accord with UDC standards. Northwest Gas Pipeline: The Northwest gas pipeline runs across the southwest corner of this site witin a 75-foot wide easement contained in Lot 15, Block 3. All development within this easement should comply with the Williams Pipeline Developer’s Handbook. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing constructed on the site is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A- 7. A mix of 6-foot tall solid vinyl privacy fencing and 4-foot tall black iron fence is proposed. The developer is required to construct fencing abutting pathways and common open space lots to distinguish common from private areas. Fences abutting all pathways and common open space lots not entirely visible from a public street are required to be an open vision or semi-private fence up to 6’ in height; or 4’ in height if closed vision fencing is used (an additional 2’ of open vision fencing may be provided at the top section of the fence). In accord with these standards, fencing adjacent to Lot 15, Block 3 should be revised; fencing should be added on Lot 23, Block 1 and at the rear of building lots adjacent to Lot 1, Block 1 on lots adjacent to Solaris Ave. and Lyra St. and Harris St.; and the beginning and end points of the 6’ concrete fence should be clearly delineated. Because this site is adjacent to SH-69, the UDC requires noise abatement to be provided for residential uses in the form of a berm or berm and wall combination a minimum of 10 feet higher than the elevation at the centerline of the state highway parallel to the state highway per the standards listed in UDC 11-3H-4D. A 6-foot tall concrete fence on top of a 4-foot tall berm is proposed; a detail of the berm and wall combination should be submitted with the first phase final plat application that depicts the centerline of SH-69. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 179 of 576 Page 17 Utilities (UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is proposed. Street lighting is required to be installed in accord with the City’s adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. See Section VIII-B below for Public Works comments/conditions. Pressurized Irrigation System (UDC 11-3A-15): An underground pressurized irrigation system is required to be provided for each lot within the development. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City’s adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. Building Elevations (UDC 11-3A-19 | Architectural Standards Manual): Conceptual building elevations and photos were submitted for the proposed single-family attached and detached units and the multi-family structures as shown in Section VII.F. Building materials for the single-family homes consist of a mix of siding (horizontal and vertical lap siding and board & batten) with stone veneer accents. Building materials for the multi-family structures consist of horizontal and vertical siding with board and batten accents (see Exhibit F in Section VII.) The single-family attached and multi-family structures are required to comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual; single-family detached structures are exempt from this requirement. Structures adjacent to W. Harris St. and SH-69 are proposed to all be a single-story in height except for those on Lots 60 and 62, Block 1 which will be 2-stories in height. To avoid monotonous wall planes, the rear of structures visible from Harris St. and SH-69 should have varied setbacks. C. VARIANCE The applicant requests a Variance to UDC 11-3H-4B for access via SH-69 at the ¼ mile between Harris St. and Amity Rd. UDC 11-3H-4B.2 prohibits new approaches directly accessing a state highway (i.e. SH-69). Public street connections to the state highway are only allowed at the section line road and at the half mile mark between section line roads. However, requests for variances can be made to City Council for the placement and/or number of access points to state highways as set forth in UDC 11-5B-4B. The purpose of limiting access to state highways are to maintain traffic flow and provide better circulation and safety within the community and for the traveling public; to preserve right -of-way for future highway expansions; and to mitigate noise impacts associated with such roadways for new residential development along state highways. The decision making body may consider and apply modifications to these standards upon specific recommendation of the Idaho Transportation Department, in which case a Variance is not required. If Council/Legal finds ITD has provided such recommendation, the Variance application could be withdrawn by the Applicant and the access request considered by Council without a Variance. The Applicant’s request is for a full access via the state highway; however, ITD has responded that they would only support a right-in/right-out/left-in until such time as a center median is constructed at which time the access would be restricted to right-in/right-out only. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 180 of 576 Page 18 In order to grant a Variance, Council must make the findings listed below; Staff is unable to make these findings in order to recommend approval of the request (see analysis in Section IX.C). 1. The variance shall not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district; 2. The variance relieves an undue hardship because of characteristics of the site; and 3. The variance shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. If Council denies the proposed Variance, the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) will need to be updated to reflect the new trip distribution and volumes; the preliminary plat would need to be revised and reconfigured to remove the access; and a new phasing plan would need to be submitted as the current plan depicts the first phase with access via SH-69. Additionally, Staff recommends the traffic signal at Harris St./SH-69 is installed with the first phase of development to protect public safety if the access via SH-69 isn’t approved. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Annexation & Zoning and Preliminary Plat as it complies with the mininimum UDC standards with the conditions included in Section VIII.A per the Findings in Section IX; and denial of the proposed Variance request per the Findings in Section IX. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard these items on January 17 and February 21, 2019. At the public hearing on February 21st, the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ and PP requests. a. Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Deb Nelson; Ronnie Wilks; Debbie Jeske; Dennis Green; Brandon Whallon, Hawkins Companies; Andrew Newland; Randy Nelson; Will Dilmore; Brittany Elliott; Carol Daily. ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: None iv. Written testimony: Kimberly Porter, Evan & Analyn Frasure, Sandy & Randy Nelson, Will Dilmore v. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen vi. Other staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony: i. Comments from happy homebuyers in other developments by the same Applicant/builder; iii. Need for housing options in the price point offered by this Developer. c. Key Issues of Discussion by Commission: i. Timing for installation of a traffic signal at the Harris St./SH-69 intersection; ii. Previous ITD approved accesses for the site via S. Meridian Rd./SH-69; iii. The proposed variance for access via SH-69; iv. The provision of a local stub street to the property to the west planned for multi- family development as recommended by Staff and required by UDC 11-3A-3 (unless otherwise waived by Council); v. Revisions to the phasing plan if access via SH-69 isn’t approved. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 181 of 576 Page 19 vi. Fire Department’s requirement for curbs to be painted red in addition to No Parking signs installed where parking is only allowed on one side of the street. d. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. Strike the last sentence of condition #A.1e in Section VIII, which requires the rear of structures visible from Harris St. & SH-69 to have varied setbacks to avoid monotonous wall planes; ii. The Commission directed the Applicant to work with the Fire Dept. on whether or not curbs need to be painted red in addition to No Parking signs being installed where parking is only allowed on one side of the street. The Fire Dept. has changed the requirement to only require No Parking signs and not curb paint (see Section VIII.A.9). e. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. The Applicant requests a Variance to UDC 11-3H-4B, which prohibits access via SH- 69, to be allowed one (1) access via SH-69 at the ¼ mile. ii. Staff recommends conditions #A.2e and A.3g in Section VIII are amended to require a local street connection (rather than just a vehicular connection) to the future multi- family development/property to the west in accord with UDC 11-3A-3 unless otherwise waived by City Council. (UDC 11-3A-3 states, “All subdivisions must provide local street access to any use that currently takes direct access from an arterial or collector street.”) The Meridian City Council heard these items on May 7, 2019. At the public hearing, the Council approved the subject AZ and PP requests and vacated the VAR request. a. Summary of City Council Public Hearing: i. In favor: Deb Nelson, Givens Pursley; Will Dilmore (also representing others in favor as follows: Dennis Green, Debbie Jeske, Ronnie Winks, and Randy Nelson); Brandon Whallon, Hawkins Companies; ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Denise LaFever iv. Written testimony: None v. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen vi. Other staff commenting on application: Joe Bongiorno b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony: i. None c. Key Issues of Discussion by Council: i. Provision of a local street connection to the property to the west; ii. Timing for construction of the traffic signal at the intersection of Harris St. & SH- 69 and associated safety concerns; iii. Anticipated future land uses on the property to the south. d. Key Council Changes to Commission Recommendation i. City Council approved a waiver to UDC 11-3A-3A.3 to not require a local street connection to the property to the west that only has access via a collector street - modify condition #A.2e and #A.3g in Section VIII to only require an emergency vehicular connection to the west; ii. City Council approved a modification to UDC 11-3H-4B.2 and vacated the Variance request due to ITD’s approval of the proposed access via SH-69 in accord with UDC 11-3H-3; iii. Strike the portion of condition #A.1d in Section VIII that requires the traffic signal at W. Harris St./SH-69 to be installed with the second phase of development. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 182 of 576 Page 20 VII. EXHIBITS A. Annexation & Zoning Legal Description and Exhibit Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 183 of 576 Page 21 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 184 of 576 Page 22 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 185 of 576 Page 23 B. Preliminary Plat (date: 1/29/2019) & Phasing Plan 1 2 3 4 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 186 of 576 Page 24 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 187 of 576 Page 25 C. Landscape Plan (date: 1/29/2019) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 188 of 576 Page 26 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 189 of 576 Page 27 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 190 of 576 Page 28 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 191 of 576 Page 29 D. Qualified Open Space Exhibit (Revised) & Site Amenities Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 192 of 576 Page 30 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 193 of 576 Page 31 E. On-Street Parking Exhibit Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 194 of 576 Page 32 F. Conceptual Building Elevations (Single-Family Attached/Detached and Multi-Family) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 195 of 576 Page 33 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 196 of 576 Page 34 G. Conceptual Development Plan for Off-Site Portion of MU-R Designated Area Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 197 of 576 Page 35 VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION Prior to annexation ordinance approval, the Applicant shall obtain final approval of a property boundary adjustment in Ada County and submit a copy of the associated recorded Record of Survey that coincides with the boundary of the preliminary plat. 1. A Development Agreement (DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. Currently, a fee of $303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six (6) months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat, phasing plan, landscape plan and building elevations included in Section VII and the provisions contained herein. b. The building lots along the perimeter of the development that are adjacent to W. Harris St. and SH-69/S. Meridian Rd., except for Lots 60 and 62, Block 1, shall be restricted to a single-story in height as proposed by the Developer. c. Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy within the first phase of development, the SH-69/S. Meridian Rd. roadway improvements, 10-foot wide multi-use pathway and street buffer landscaping shall be constructed along the full length of the project boundary along SH-69/S. Meridian Rd. d. Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy within the second phase of development, the W. Harris St. roadway improvements including curb, gutter and detached sidewalk and street buffer landscaping along the full length of the project boundary along W. Harris St. shall be constructed; and the traffic signal at W. Harris St./SH-69 shall be installed. e. All single-family attached and multi-family structures shall comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. An application for Design Review shall be submitted and approved for all attached dwellings prior to submittal of building permit applications. An application for Design Review and Certificate of Zoning Compliance shall be submitted and approved for all multi-family structures prior to submittal of building permit applications. To avoid monotonous wall planes, the rear of structures visible from Harris St. and SH-69 should have varied setbacks. f. Provide a vehicular connection between this site and the planned multi-family development to the west for interconnectivity. g. Site amenities shall be provided within the development per those described in Section VII.D; comparable amenities as determined by Staff may be considered as substitutions. h. All development within the Northwest gas pipeline easement shall comply with the Williams Gas Pipeline Developer’s Handbook. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 198 of 576 Page 36 i. A Conditional Use Permit is required to be submitted and approved for the multi-family development prior to application for Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review. 2. The preliminary plat included in Section VII.B, shall be revised as follows: a. Include the front lot dimension on lots in Block 1 that is missing. b. Revise the phasing plan so that the first phase of development is adjacent to Harris St. for access purposes because access via SH-69 is prohibited per UDC 11-3H-4B.2. If Council approves a Varaince which would allow the access, the phasing plan does not need to be revised. c. Remove the access via SH-69 as access is prohibited per UDC 11-3H-4B.2, unless otherwise approved by City Council. d. Provide a secondary emergency access that meets Fire Department requirements (IFC Section D104.3) and remove the access via SH-69 unless Council approves a Variance for a public street access via SH-69. e. Depict an emergency vehicular connection between this site and the planned multi- family development to the west. 3. The landscape plan included in Section VII.C shall be revised as follows: a. Include a symbol for the 6’ concrete fence in the legend and the beginning and end points of the fence along SH-69. b. Include a detail of the 6-foot tall concrete fence on top of a 4-foot tall berm as proposed along SH-69 that depicts the centerline of SH-69 that demonstrates compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3H-4D with the first phase final plat application. c. Depict fencing adjacent to Lot 15, Block 3 in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7A.7b. d. Depict fencing on Lot 23, Block 1 in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A- 7A.7. e. Depict fencing at the rear of building lots adjacent to Lot 1, Block 1 on lots adjacent to Solaris Ave., Lyra St. and Harris St. f. Depict landscaping along all pathways per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C. g. Depict an emergency vehicular connection between this site and the planned multi- family development to the west. h. Depict landscaping along the pathway on Lot 26, Block 3 in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C if this lot is counted toward the qualified open space as currently shown on the open space exhibit in Section VII.D. i. Replace the gravel symbol and replace it with the lawn symbol within the street buffer along SH-69 in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.3a. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 199 of 576 Page 37 4. A 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement is required to be submitted to the Planning Division for the multi-use pathway within the street buffer along SH-69 and within the Northwest Pipeline corridor prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat for the phase in which it is located; coordinate the details of the easement with Kim Warren, Park’s Department. 5. For lots accessed by common driveways, an exhibit is required to be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks, fencing, building envelope and orientation of the lots and structures. Driveways for abutting properties that aren’t taking access from the common driveway(s) should be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line away from the common driveway. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited unless separated by a minimum 5-foot wide landscaped buffer. 6. Signage for addressing needs to be provided for homes accessed by the common driveways on Lots 10 & 61, Block 1; Lots 23 & 29, Block 2; and Lot 28, Block 3 for emergency wayfinding purposes. 7. A perpetual ingress/egress easement is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder for all common driveways, which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. A copy of the recorded easement should be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 8. All existing structures on the site shall be removed prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat in which they are located. 9. Parking is restricted to only one side of the 27-foot wide street section for W. Broyhill St.; the curb shall be painted red and signage shall be installed prohibiting parking on one side of the street to ensure emergency access can be provided. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 A street light plan will need to be included in the final plat application. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the City's Design Standards. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272 1.2 Each phase must be modeled as developed to ensure adequate fire flow. 1.3 A water main connection to the west (proposed Graycliff Apartments) is needed, and can be co-located within a common driveway/pathway. Coordinate design location with the Meridian Development Analyst during construction plan review. 2 General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code (MCC), the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 200 of 576 Page 38 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year- round source of water (MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at (208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 201 of 576 Page 39 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20 At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/160245/Page1.aspx D. POLICE DEPARTMENT http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/160225/Page1.aspx Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 202 of 576 Page 40 E. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO (COMPASS) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/160222/Page1.aspx F. BOISE PROJECT BOARD OF CONTROL http://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink8/DocView.aspx?id=160052&dbid=0 G. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT http://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink8/DocView.aspx?id=159845&dbid=0 H. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (DEQ) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/159880/Page1.aspx I. WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT (WASD) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/160498/Page1.aspx J. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT (ACHD) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink8/DocView.aspx?id=161671&dbid=0 K. IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT (ITD) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/browse.aspx?dbid=0 L. VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT (VRT) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/160309/Page1.aspx IX. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone (UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission, the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone, the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the proposed annexation of the subject 35.67 acre property with R-15 zoning and proposed development is consistent with the MU-R designation. (See section V above for more information.) 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment and development complies with the purpose statement of the residential districts in that it will provide for a range of housing opportunities consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare as the proposed residential use should be compatible with adjacent existing and future residential uses in the area. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 203 of 576 Page 41 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including, but not limited to, school districts; and The City Council finds that City services are available to be provided to this development. The School District has submitted comments, included in Section VIII.I, that currently show student enrollment is below capacity; however, the proposed development may cause area schools to be over capacity depending on the age of school children enrolled. 5. The annexation (as applicable) is in the best interest of city. The City Council finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City. B. Preliminary Plat (UDC 11-6B-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat, the decision making body shall make the following findings: (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15- 2005) 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; (Ord. 08-1372, 7-8-2008, eff. 7-8-2008) The City Council finds the proposed plat is generally in conformance with the UDC if the Applicant complies with the conditions of approval in Section VIII. 2. Public services are available or can be made available ad are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds public services can be made available to the subject property and will be adequate to accomoate the proposed development. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; The City Council finds the proposed plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City’s CIP. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The City Council finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. (Ord. 05-1170, 8- 30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) The City Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that need to be preserved with this development. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 204 of 576 Page 42 C. Variance (UDC 11-5B-4E) Required Findings: In order to grant a variance, the council shall make the following findings: 1. The variance shall not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district; Staff finds that granting a Variance for access via SH-69 would grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed as the UDC (11-3H-4B) prohibits new approaches directly accessing a state highway. 2. The variance relieves an undue hardship because of characteristics of the site; and Staff finds there are no characteristics of the site that create a hardship for development that granting the variance would relieve. The Applicant could construct a backage road adjacent to SH-69 but prefers the access via SH-69. 3. The variance shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) Staff finds that granting a Variance for access via SH-69 would likely be detrimental to the safety and welfare of the public, especially a left-in access which would encourage traffic movements across 2 lanes of high speed traffic and vehicles slowing down to turn left and sitting in the center lane waiting to turn left. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 205 of 576 (�� E IDIAN*,-----IZ I DAJ CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 K Project File Name/Number: Item Title: Fire Department Memorandum of Understanding Between IAFF Local 4627 and The City of Meridian. Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.K . Presenter: Deputy C hief J oe B ongiorno Estimated Time for P resentation: 5 minutes Title of I tem - F ire Department: M emorandum of Understanding between I AF F L ocal 4627 and the C ity of M er idian Memorandum of Understanding between I A F F L ocal 4627 and the City of Meridian to waive time-in- grade requirements f or an upcoming Meridian Fire Engineer promotional exam C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate MO U-I A F F 4627 A greements / C ontracts 5/13/2019 Memo to Council C over Memo 5/15/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate F ire J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/13/2019 - 1:48 P M F ire B aird, Ted Approved 5/16/2019 - 2:34 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 206 of 576 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 51}_ This Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") is entered into this Z day of Maw, 2019, by and between IAFF Local 4627 ("UNION") and the City of Meridian ("CITY"). WHEREAS, the UNION and the CITY are parties to a Collective Labor Agreement effective October 16, 2018 — September 30, 2020 ("CLA") covering various terms and conditions of Employment of the Firefighter employees of the CITY; and WHEREAS, there will not exist an eligibility list of qualified candidates for promotion to the position of Engineer to maintain an adequate `float' pool at the Engineer position for one of the three (3) shifts, the UNION and CITY agree that a special test may be given, as set forth in Article 15 (Promotions) of the current CLA to provide qualified candidates for promotion to the above -referenced Engineer and float pool; and NOW THEREFORE, the CITY and UNION hereby agree as follows: The CITY shall conduct an Engineer promotional exam in August 2019 for purposes of Article 15. 2. The CITY and UNION agree to waive the time -in -grade requirement of Article 15 for all Firefighter II members who have completed the required Engineer Development Program (EDP) OR who have the required Certificates of Completion as referenced in the current CLA. The parties agree that this MOU shall expire upon the approval of a subsequent CLA between the parties or September 30, 2020 unless otherwise extended by mutual Agreement. Ur-JR1tree, President Date Local #4627 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 2.I5day of MQJQ 52019. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 21S�.day of R , 2019. APPROVED: Mayor Ta y e Weerd ATTEST - City Clerk MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING - Article 15 - Promotions - Waivers of Time In Grade and Probationary Status Meridian Fire Department 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite #210 Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-888-1234 www.meridiancity.org May 10, 2019 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Members CC: Mark Niemeyer FROM: Meridian Fire Department , Deputy Charlie Butterfield RE: MOU between the IAFF Local 4627 & the City of Meridian Asking for approval and signature on a Memorandum of Understanding to waive time-in-grade requirements for an upcoming Meridian Fire Engineer promotional exam. We have recognized that with the staffing of Engine 36 in June, we are going to be short one Engineer on staffing (B- shift float Engineer). This MOU is going to provide the ability for us to test for promotion for Engineer in August and fill that vacancy. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 208 of 576 Cj�/rE IDfZ IAN,? -- CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 L Project File Name/Number: Item Title: Coastline Equipment License and Indemnity Agreement For Mini Heavy Equipment Rodeo Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.L . Presenter: Estimated Time for P resentation: 10 Title of I tem - L icense and Indemnity Agreement with Coastline E quipment for M ini Heavy Equipment Rodeo C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate L icense A greement A greements / C ontracts 5/14/2019 A greement Memo C over Memo 5/14/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate P ublic Works.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/14/2019 - 11:57 A M P ublic Works.B aird, Ted Approved 5/15/2019 - 4:12 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 209 of 576 LICENSE AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT with Coastline Equipment for the 2019 PUBLIC WORKS WEER MINI HEAVY EQUIPMENT RODEO +- This LICENSE AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT is made this, -,1 day of, 2019 ("Effective Date"), by and between Coastline Equipment whose address is 2000 E. Oven d Road, Meridian, Idaho (hereinafter "Licensee"), and the City of Meridian, Idaho, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho (hereinafter "City"), whose address is 33 E. Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho. WHEREAS, City is hosting an event at the Meridian City Hall Plaza on June 12, 2019 to celebrate Public Works Week; and WHEREAS, as part of the Public Works Week celebration, Licensee is sponsoring a mini heavy equipment rodeo activity in the City Hall east parking lot (referred to herein as the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the City of Meridian is willing to allow Licensee a limited license to use Property for this purpose; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals and mutual covenants, agreements, and inducements contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows: I. SCOPE OF LICENSE GRANTED BY CITY. A. Scope of use. Licensee's use and occupancy of the Property shall be limited to activities associated with the mini heavy equipment rodeo, specific activities include the following: Up to two mini excavators will be on site for the public to test their skills at operation of the equipment in a competition setting. The setup will include plastic swimming pools filled with water and a "fishing" competition with the bucket and arm of the excavator. The area of operation will be delineated with traffic candles and caution tape for public safety. B. Participant Waiver and Release Required. Licensee shall have each participant execute the "Release and Waiver of Liability Agreement" in form and content substantially similar to that set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. C. Term of ficense. The term of this Agreement shall be from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. on June 12, 2019, along with sufficient time to set up and tear down immediately before and after the time period set forth herein. II. INDEMNIFICATION; INSURANCE. A. Indemnification. In consideration of Licensee's fee -free access to and use of Property, LICENSE AND IDE.MNITYAGRFEMF_.NT Page 1 of 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 211 of 576 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 212 of 576 F. Compliance; no discrimination. In undertaking activities under or related to this Agreement, Licensee shall comply in all respects with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, policies, agreements, and requirements, including, but not limited to, the CUP, and farther shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, age or disability. G. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral of written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. H. Advice of attorney. Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement, it has received independent legal advice from its attorney and/or has received the opportunity to seek such advice. I. Applicable law. The laws of the State of Idaho shall govern the validity, interpretation, performance and enforcement of this Agreement. Venue shall be in the courts of Ada County, Idaho. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties shall cause this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers to be effective as of the day and year first above written. LICENSEE Coastline Equipment Mon Sever Branch Manager CITY OF MERIDIAN: Tammy de rd, Mayor �Q0VtATED,4 J C'ilvuf Ei D1gN% Attest m s �OgHO City Clerk �ti, EAL ��rhe TREASV LICENSE AND IDEMNITYAGREEMENT Page 4 of 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 214 of 576 Page 1 of 2 Mayor Tammy de Weerd City Council Members: Joe Borton Treg Bernt Genesis Milam Luke Cavener Ty Palmer Anne Little Roberts Public Works Department TO: Mayor Tammy de Weerd Members of the City Council FROM: Dinae Kerr– Asset Management Specialist DATE: May 21, 2019 SUBJECT: MINI HEAVY EQUIPMENT RODEO AGREEMENT WITH COASTLINE FOR PUBLIC WORKS WEEK EXPO 2019 I. RECOMMENDED ACTION A. Move to: 1. Approve the License and Indemnity Agreement with Coastline for the Mini Heavy Equipment Rodeo 2. Authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement. II. DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSONS Dinae Kerr, PWW Expo Chair 489-0380 Kristina Keith, PWW Expo Sub-Chair 489-0338 Susie Deardorff, PW Admin Division Manager 489-0361 III. DESCRIPTION A. Background For the past five years, the Mini Heavy Equipment Rodeo has been a focal point of the Public Works Week Expo. This year, we are working primarily with Coastline to keep the tradition alive by having a Mini Heavy Equipment Rodeo at the Expo. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 215 of 576 Page 2 of 2 IV. IMPACT A. Strategic Impact: The City Hall east parking lot will be closed for the expo and the mini heavy equipment rodeo. The rodeo will take place in the center of the parking lot, and will be roped off using traffic cones and caution tape. The equipment will be live and operational, so it can be quickly moved, if necessary. B. Fiscal Impact: License and Indemnity Agreement $0.00 V. ALTERNATIVES A. The City could choose not to sign the License and Indemnity Agreement with Coastline; this will prevent the Mini Heavy Equipment Rodeo at City Hall. VI. TIME CONSTRAINTS Council’s approval will allow for the timely return of the signed license agreement to Coastline. This will allow Coastline to prepare properly for the Mini Heavy Equipment Rodeo. VII. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS A. License and Indemnity Agreement (Rodeo) Approved for Council Agenda: ______________ Date Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 216 of 576 EIDIANIZDAHO *- CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 M Project File Name/Number: Item Title: Community Development Block Grant Agreement with the Public Works Department Meeting Notes: Program Year 2018 For a Not -to -Exceed amount of $50,000 I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.M. Presenter: Estimated Time for P resentation: Title of I tem - Progr am Year 2018 Community Development B lock G rant Agreement with the Public Works Department for a Not-to-Exceed Amount of $50,000 R eallocation of unspent P Y18 C D B G funds toward an alternate project approved in the P Y18 A ction Plan. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate P ublic Works Department A greement A greements / C ontracts 5/15/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate Community Development.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/15/2019 - 10:32 A M Community Development.B aird, Ted Approved 5/15/2019 - 4:14 P M L egal.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/15/2019 - 3:23 P M F inance.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/15/2019 - 3:22 P M F inance.B aird, Ted Approved 5/15/2019 - 4:13 P M L egal.B aird, Ted Approved 5/15/2019 - 4:14 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 217 of 576 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a M a y 2 1 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 2 1 8 o f 5 7 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a M a y 2 1 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 2 1 9 o f 5 7 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a M a y 2 1 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 2 2 0 o f 5 7 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a M a y 2 1 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 2 2 1 o f 5 7 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a M a y 2 1 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 2 2 2 o f 5 7 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a M a y 2 1 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 2 2 3 o f 5 7 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a M a y 2 1 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 2 2 4 o f 5 7 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a M a y 2 1 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 2 2 5 o f 5 7 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a M a y 2 1 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 2 2 6 o f 5 7 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a M a y 2 1 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 2 2 7 o f 5 7 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a M a y 2 1 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 2 2 8 o f 5 7 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a M a y 2 1 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 2 2 9 o f 5 7 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a M a y 2 1 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 2 3 0 o f 5 7 6 P. Non -waiver. Failure of either party to promptly enforce the strict performance of any term of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver or relinquishment of any party's right to thereafter enforce such term, and any right or remedy hereunder may be asserted at any time after the governing body of either party becomes entitled to the benefit thereof, notwithstanding delay in enforcement. Q. Approval required. This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the respective governing bodies of both City and Subrecipient. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties shall cause this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers to be effective as of the day and year first above written. SUBRECIPIENT: City of Meridian, Public Works Department are Bolthouse, Director CITY: City of Meridian Attest: By: Ta eerd, Mayor Chris Johnso7"f1he 11 of ALrTRV- PY18 SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT — CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PAGE 14 OF 14 (��/rE IDIZ IAN,'±- �J CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 N Project File Name/Number: Item Title: Community Development Block Grant Amendment with The Jesse Tree of Idaho Meeting Notes: Program Year 2018 For a Not -to -Exceed amount of $25,000 c✓ � . I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.N. Presenter: Estimated Time for P resentation: Title of I tem - Progr am Year 2018 Community Development B lock G rant Amendment with T he J esse Tree of Idaho for a Not-to-Exceed Amount of $25,000 R eallocation of unexpended P Y18 f unding for a previously approved project to add $15,000 for a total of $25,000. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate J esse Tree A mendment A greements / C ontracts 5/15/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate Community Development.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/15/2019 - 2:34 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 232 of 576 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 233 of 576 No other understanding, whether oral or written, shall be deemed to enlarge, limit or otherwise affect the operation of the PY18 SRA or this First Amendment thereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties shall cause this First Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized officers to be effective as of the day and year first above written. SUBRECIPIENT: The Jesse Tree of Idaho L C4�z� Ali Rabe, Executive Director CITY: City of Meridian EEM,,i% FIRST AMENDMENT TO PY18 SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT THE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO Attest: P'jED AUS,` >rI City Clerk 0 E IDIAN-- IDAHO , SEAL \c` PAGE 2 OF 2 �/rE IDIZ IA*,-----NDAHO CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 O Project File Name/Number: H-2019-0019 Item Title: Development Agreement for ICOM Parking Expansion Meeting Notes: With Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, LLC (Owner/Developer), Located at 885 S. Locust Grove Rd. YXI I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.O. Presenter: S tephanie L eonard Estimated Time for P resentation: 0 Title of I tem - Development Agreement for IC O M Parking E xpansion (H-2019-0019) with Idaho C ollege of Osteopathic M edicine, L L C (Owner/Developer), L ocated at 885 S. L ocust Grove Rd. Develo p ment Agreement between the C ity of Meridian and Id aho C ollege of O s teo p athic Medic ine, LLC (O W NER /DE VELO P ER ) for the IC O M P arking Exp ansion (H-2019-0019) C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate E xhibit A-I C O M P arking E xpansion(H-2019-0019)E xhibit 5/15/2019 E xhibit B -I C O M Parking E xpansion (H-2019-0019)E xhibit 5/15/2019 S igned D A-I C O M P arking E xpansion (H-2019-0019)A greements / C ontracts 5/15/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate Community Development.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/15/2019 - 12:03 P M Community Development.A lbertson, Michelle Approved 5/15/2019 - 12:05 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 235 of 576 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2019-042910 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=27 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 05/22/2019 10:35 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE PARTIES: 1. City of Meridian 2. Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, LLC, Owner/Developer THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this Agreement), is made and entered into this day of 2019, by and between City of Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, herea4er called CITY whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642 and Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, LLC, whose address is 1401 East Central Drive, Meridian, ID 83642, hereinafter called OWNER/DEVELOPER. 1. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, Owner is the sole owner, in law and/or equity, of certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, described in Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, herein after referred to as the Property; and 1.2 WHEREAS, Idaho Code § 67-6511A provides that cities may, by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of zoning that the Owner/Developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject Property; and 1.3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Section 11-513-3 of the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re -zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer has submitted an application for annexation and zoning of 2.34 acres of land with a C -G (General Retail and Service Commercial) zoning district to accommodate the construction of an offsite parking lot for the Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, under the Unified Development Code, which generally describes how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.5 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer made representations at the public hearing before the Meridian City Council, as to how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.6 WHEREAS, the record of the proceedings for the modification of development agreements held before the City Council, includes responses of government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction, and includes further testimony and comment; and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ICOM PARKING EXPANSION (H-2019-0019) PAGE I OF 7 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT – ICOM PARKING EXPANSION (H-2019-0019) PAGE 2 OF 7 1.7 WHEREAS, on the 23rd day of April, 2019, the Meridian City Council approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order (“Findings”), for the modification of four development agreements, which have been incorporated into this Agreement and attached as Exhibit “B”; and 1.8 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer deems it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and request; and 1.9 WHEREAS, City requires the Owner/Developer to enter into a development agreement for the purpose of ensuring that the Property is developed and the subsequent use of the Property is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, herein being established as a result of evidence received by the City in the proceedings for zoning designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure zoning designation are in accordance with the amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian on October 11, 2016, Resolution No. 16-1173, and the UDC, Title 11. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement the following words, terms, and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for, unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 CITY: means and refers to the City of Meridian, a party to this Agreement, which is a municipal Corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. 3.2 OWNER/DEVELOPER: means and refers to Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, LLC, 1401 E. Central Drive, Meridian, ID 83642, the party that owns and is developing said Property and shall include any subsequent owner(s)/developer(s) of the Property. 3.4 PROPERTY: means and refers to that certain parcel(s) of Property located in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as described in Exhibit “A” describing the parcel to be zoned C-G (General Retail and Service Commercial) zoning district as described in Exhibit “A” is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall vest the right to develop the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 257 of 576 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT – ICOM PARKING EXPANSION (H-2019-0019) PAGE 3 OF 7 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed under the UDC. 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1. Owner/Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the site plan included in Section VII of the Staff Report attached to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, attached hereto as Exhibit “B”, and the provisions contained herein. b. The Hunter Lateral is approved to remain open in accord with UDC 11-3A-6. c. Direct access to S. Locust Grove Rd. is prohibited; primary access shall be via E. Central Dr. only in accord with UDC 11-3A-3. d. Cross-access to the property to the north shall be required to allow for future redevelopment. A cross-access easement agreement shall be provided upon CZC and DES application submittal. e. All future development of the subject property shall comply with the City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of development. f. Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Administrative Design Review applications are required to be submitted to the Planning Division for approval of all future buildings/uses on the site, prior to applying for building permit. The site plan included with the CZC application shall include wayfinding signage that directs pedestrians from the parking area to the intersection of Locust Grove and Central for safe crossing. g. All structures shall be removed from the property within 60 days of annexation into the City. h. A 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement is required to be submitted to the Planning Division for the pathway (coordinate details with Kim Warren, Park’s Dept. 208-888-3579). 6. COMPLIANCE PERIOD This Agreement must be fully executed within six (6) months after the date of the Findings for the annexation and zoning or it is null and void. 7. DEFAULT/CONSENT TO DE-ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: 7.1 Acts of Default. Either party’s failure to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement shall constitute default under this Agreement. 7.2 Notice and Cure Period. In the event of Owner/Developer’s default of this Agreement, Owner/Developer shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of written notice from City to initiate commencement of action to correct the breach and cure the default, which action must be prosecuted with diligence and completed within one hundred eighty (180) days; provided, however, that in the case of any such default that cannot with diligence be cured within such one hundred eighty (180) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 258 of 576 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT – ICOM PARKING EXPANSION (H-2019-0019) PAGE 4 OF 7 day period, then the time allowed to cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. 7.3 Remedies. In the event of default by Owner/Developer that is not cured after notice as described in Section 7.2, Owner/Developer shall be deemed to have consented to modification of this Agreement and de-annexation and reversal of the zoning designations described herein, solely against the offending portion of Property and upon City’s compliance with all applicable laws, ordinances and rules, including any applicable provisions of Idaho Code §§ 67-6509 and 67-6511. Owner/Developer reserves all rights to contest whether a default has occurred. This Agreement shall be enforceable in the Fourth Judicial District Court in Ada County by either City or Owner/Developer, or by any successor or successors in title or by the assigns of the parties hereto. Enforcement may be sought by an appropriate action at law or in equity to secure the specific performance of the covenants, agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein. 7.4 Delay. In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either Owner/Developer or City is delayed for causes that are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes, the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. 7.5 Waiver. A waiver by City of any default by Owner/Developer of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the default and defaults waived and shall neither bar any other rights or remedies of City nor apply to any subsequent default of any such or other covenants and conditions. 8. INSPECTION: Owner/Developer shall, immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the Property as required by this Agreement or by City ordinance or policy, notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer’s inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other ordinances of the City that apply to said Property. 9. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: City shall record this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, and submit proof of such recording to Owner/Developer, prior to the third reading of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the re-zoning of the Property by the City Council. If for any reason after such recordation, the City Council fails to adopt the ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property contemplated hereby, the City shall execute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement. 10. ZONING: City shall, following recordation of the duly approved Agreement, enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the Property as specified herein. 11. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The City may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, cash deposits, certified check or negotiable bonds, as allowed under the UDC, to insure the installation of required improvements, which the Owner/Developer agree to provide, if required by the City. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 259 of 576 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT – ICOM PARKING EXPANSION (H-2019-0019) PAGE 5 OF 7 12. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed, completed, and accepted by the City, or sufficient surety of performance is provided by Owner/Developer to the City in accordance with Paragraph 11 above. 13. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That Owner/Developer agrees to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian unless otherwise provided by this Agreement. 14. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY: with copy to: City Clerk City Attorney City of Meridian City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 Meridian, ID 83642 OWNER/DEVELOPER: Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, LLC 1401 E. Central Drive Meridian, ID 83642 14.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 15. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 16. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 17. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties’ respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including City’s corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the Owner/Developer, each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. City agrees, upon written request of Owner/Developer, to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 260 of 576 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT – ICOM PARKING EXPANSION (H-2019-0019) PAGE 6 OF 7 Agreement if City, in its sole and reasonable discretion, had determined that Owner/Developer have fully performed their obligations under this Agreement. 18. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 19. DUTY TO ACT REASONABLY: Unless otherwise expressly provided, each party shall act reasonably in giving any consent, approval, or taking any other action under this Agreement. 20. COOPERATION OF THE PARTIES: In the event of any legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third party (including a governmental entity or official) challenging the validity of any provision in this Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate in defending such action or proceeding. 21. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition and understandings between Owner/Developer and City relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or understanding, either oral or written, express or implied, between Owner/Developer and City, other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to City, to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. 21.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing re-zoning of the subject Property herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 22. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective on the date the Meridian City Council shall adopt the amendment to the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property and execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. [end of text; signatures, acknowledgements, and Exhibits A and B follow] Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 261 of 576 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. OWNER/DEVELOPER: Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, LLC l�, (Z• - By: _Pjgg,--ron_ at=• Its: CITY OF MERIDIAN ATTEST' �QO�PiED Au �o z 01V of Mayo a my de Weerd CI y CI E I RAN�- IDAHO .1 s� SEAL STATE OF IDAHO ) T�?'fthe TREPSJ��` ss: County of Ada, ) On this ' 1 day of C , 2019, before me, the undersigned, a Nota Public in and for said State, personally appeared C he ��, U)'Z`SbNc known or identified to me to be�j'c. a-4 _'tr \' � of Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, LLC and the who signed above and acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of said corporation. , I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate wriflll Q %, _ OTARy';� S PUBLIC, i Notary Pu fo 1 a o Residing at: p i` �.,�CL.'� 2 No. �$;.• 0�.`� My Commission Expires: 16 K Ab, : ss County of Ada ) On this I5+ day of Mau , 2019, before me, allotary Public, personally appeared Tammy de Weerd and , know or ' ntified tome to be the Mayor and Clerk, respectively, ofthe City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged tome that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. %MISSION ARLENE WAY ;1x67390 Notary Public or Idaho NOTARY PUBLIC Residing at: STATE OF IDAHO Commission expires: - g - MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 3/28122 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — ICOM PARKING EXPANSION (H-2019-0019) PAGE 7 OF 7 EXHIBIT A ICOM Parking Expansion – H-2019-0019 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 236 of 576 EXHIBIT A ICOM Parking Expansion – H-2019-0019 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 237 of 576 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2019-0019 - 1 - CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Annexation and Zoning of 2.34 acres of land with a C-G zoning district to accommodate the construction of a parking lot for the Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine (ICOM), by The Land Group. Case No(s). H-2019-0019 For the City Council Hearing Date of: April 23, 2019 (Findings on May 7, 2019) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 23, 2019, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 23, 2019, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 23, 2019, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 23, 2019, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the “Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,” codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted April 19, 2011, Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 7, 2019 – Page 196 of 537 EXHIBIT B Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 238 of 576 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2019-0019 - 2 - 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 23, 2019, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council’s authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant’s request for annexation is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of April 23, 2019, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six (6) months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six (6) month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of April 23, 2019 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 7, 2019 – Page 197 of 537Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 239 of 576 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 2019. COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOE BORTON COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS COUNCIL MEMBER TY PALMER COUNCIL MEMBER TREG BERNT COUNCIL MEMBER GENESIS MILAM MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD TIE BREAKER) Attest: N"". _. G` M dhris4 m o s Interim i Cle 1 441 day of , VOTED Ain VOTED VOTED VOTED VOTED VOTED VOTED Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: kJl llli W Dated: City Clerk's Office CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2019-0019 SC OrYI - 3 - Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 240 of 576 EXHIBIT A Page 1 HEARING DATE: 4/23/2019 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Stephanie Leonard, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2019-0019 ICOM Parking Expansion LOCATION: 885 S. Locust Grove Rd., in the SE ¼ of Section 18, Township 3N., Range 1E. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant, The Land Group, has requested annexation and zoning of 2.34 acres of land with a C- G zoning district to accommodate the construction of an offsite parking lot for the Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine (ICOM). II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Description Details Page Acreage 2.34 Future Land Use Designation Commercial Existing Land Use Single-family rural residential Proposed Land Use(s) Parking lot Current Zoning R6 Proposed Zoning C-G Lots (# and type; bldg/common) 1 Amenities 10-foot multi-use pathway Physical Features (waterways, hazards, flood plain, hillside) Hunter Lateral along the west boundary of the site Neighborhood meeting date; # of attendees: January 31, 2019; no attendees History (previous approvals) N/A Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 7, 2019 – Page 199 of 537Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 241 of 576 EXHIBIT A Page 2 B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District Staff report (yes/no) No Requires ACHD Commission Action yes/no) No Access (Arterial/Collectors/State Hwy/Local)(Existing and Proposed) E. Central Dr. (collector) Stub Street/Interconnectivity/Cross Access Drive aisle stub proposed in northwest part of site to provide for future connectivity Existing Road Network Existing Arterial Sidewalks / Buffers Seven-foot wide attached sidewalk along S. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Central Dr. Wastewater Distance to Sewer Services 0 Sewer Shed Five Mile Trunkshed Estimated Project Sewer ERU’s See application info. WRRF Declining Balance 13.59 Project Consistent with WW Master Plan/Facility Plan Yes Water Distance to Water Services 0 Pressure Zone Three Estimated Project Water ERU’s See application info. Water Quality Concerns None Project Consistent with Water Master Plan Yes Impacts/Concerns None Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 7, 2019 – Page 200 of 537Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 242 of 576 EXHIBIT A Page 3 C. Project Area Maps III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Representative: The Land Group, Inc. 462 E. Shore Dr., Ste. 100 Eagle, ID 83616 B. Owner: McKague Family Revocable Living Trust 885 S. Locust Grove Rd. Meridian, ID 83642 Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Planned Development Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 7, 2019 – Page 201 of 537Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 243 of 576 EXHIBIT A Page 4 IV. NOTICING Planning & Zoning Posting Date City Council Posting Date Newspaper Notification 3/1/2019 4/5/2019 Radius notification mailed to properties within 300 feet 2/26/2019 4/3/2019 Radius notification published on 3/6/2019 4/4/2019 Nextdoor posting 2/26/2019 4/3/2019 V. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed annexation area is contiguous to City annexed property to the west and south and is within the Area of City Impact Boundary. A legal description for the annexation area is included in Section VII.A. The City may require a development agreement (DA) in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. In order to ensure the site develops as proposed with this application, staff recommends a DA as a provision of annexation with the provisions included in Section VIII. A. Future Land Use Map Designation (https://www.meridiancity.org/compplan) The commercial designation provides for a full range of commercial and retail to serve area residents and visitors. Uses may include retail, wholesale, service and office uses, multi-family residential, as well as appropriate public uses such as government offices. The proposed use of this site as a parking lot expansion for the Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine (ICOM) will serve area residents and visitors by allocating additional vehicle space for students, faculty and visitors. Additional space within the proposed area will alleviate the shortage of parking available to Renaissance High School and Idaho State University, which occupy the same general region. Although the offsite parking is not a preferred use for this property, staff believes the requested zoning and Commercial FLUM provides flexibility for redevelopment in the future. B. Comprehensive Plan Policies (https://www.meridiancity.org/compplan): Require all new and reconstructed parking lots to provide landscaping in internal islands and along streets.” (2.01.04B) Restrict private curb cuts and access points on collectors and arterial streets.” (3.06.02D) Implement the City’s Pathways Master Plan.” (5.03.01A) C. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There is an existing home and accessory structures on this site that will be removed with annexation of the property. D. Proposed Use Analysis: The proposed use for this site is a parking lot with approximately one-hundred ninety (190) to be utilized by ICOM. A parking lot is a principally permitted use in the proposed zone (C-G). Staff recommends that a provision be made in the Development Agreement to require any future use of the property to submit a certificate of zoning compliance and design review prior to submittal of building permits. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 7, 2019 – Page 202 of 537Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 244 of 576 EXHIBIT A Page 5 E. Site Plan: A site plan was submitted with annexation application that depicts how the site is proposed to develop with the parking lot expansion. Approximately 190 parking stalls are proposed to serve the students and faculty of the ICOM. The proposed site plan is substantially approved but will be further analyzed with the required CZC and DES application. F. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): Development is required to comply with the dimesnional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3. Parking lot design shall comply with the standards in UDC Table 11-3C-5. G. Access (UDC 11-3A-3, 11-3H-4): One (1) full access is proposed via E. Central Dr., a collector roadway, in accord with UDC 11- 3A-3 and the Comprehensive Plan (action item #3.06.02D). A stub street is proposed at the northwest part of the site to allow for future development of the subject site or surrounding properties. Direct access to S. Locust Grove Rd. shall not be permitted. Cross access to the site to the north shall be required as a provision of the DA. The proposed location of the drive aisle into the parking lot is located approximately 130 feet to the east of an existing access point into the ICOM campus parking lot to the south. Since the proposed parking lot is located across E. Central Dr. (a commercial collector) from the college, providing an easily navigable pedestrian and vehicle setting is crucial. Staff believes there is an opportunity to align the proposed parking lot access point with the existing entrance for the current ICOM parking lot (see Exhibit VII.C) by utilizing the undeveloped parcel to the west parcel #S1118417375). The land is currently owned by the State of Idaho and is a remnant parcel near the Idaho State Police site. Staff believes the applicant could work with the State of Idaho to either purchase the parcel or acquire a cross-access easement to use the land. Aligning the two (2) entrances would provide for safer pedestrian crossing and less diagonal traffic crossing from one (1) parking lot to the other. As mentioned in item I below, one (1) signalized pedestrian light exists at the intersection of E. Central Dr. and S. Locust Grove Rd. Increasing the visibility and continuity of the existing drive aisle with the proposed drive aisle would aid in ensuring pedestrians and vehicles are able to safely cross E. Central Dr. Staff recommends the Commission determine whether the applicant should be required to provide an access point that aligns with the current parking lot to the south as shown in Exhibit VII.C. H. Pathways ( UDC 11-3A-8): A segment of the City’s multi-use pathway system is proposed along the west side of the Hunter Lateral in accord with the Pathways Master Plan and the Comprehensive Plan (action item 5.03.01A); a 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement is required to be submitted to the Planning Division for the pathway (coordinate details with Kim Warren, Park’s Dept. 208-888- 3579). Landscaping is required to be provided adjacent to all pathways as set forth in UDC 11- 3B-12C. I. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): Sidewalks are required to be provided with development in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. A seven-foot sidewalk exists along S. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Central Dr., in accord with UDC standards. The applicant is currently proposing two (2) pedestrian walkways at the south part of the site to connect patrons to E. Central Dr. Typically, staff would prefer to have both proposed walkways constructed as they provide extra pedestrian connection to E. Central Dr. and ultimately ICOM across the street. However, since the only designated pedestrian crossing exists at the light at S. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Central Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 7, 2019 – Page 203 of 537Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 245 of 576 EXHIBIT A Page 6 Dr., staff recommends the applicant only provide the walkway connecting the southeastern part of the parking lot to the sidewalk along E. Central Dr. Staff believes that limiting designated walkways from the parking lot to the existing sidewalk will limit the number of patrons tempted to cross E. Central Dr. without a designated crosswalk or pedestrian light. Staff has communicated this change to the applicant and they are amenable to making that change in the site plan. The applicant has agreed to install wayfinding signs and other mechanisms to guide patrons across E. Central Dr. using the designated crosswalk at the light. J. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): A minimum 25-foot wide street buffer is required to be provided along S. Locust Grove Rd. Rd., an arterial street; and a 20-foot wide street buffer is required to be provided along E. Central Dr., a collector as set forth in UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the C-G district. Landscaping is required within the buffers in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. All landscape buffers and parking lot landscaping is required to be maintained by the owner or a managing association. Parking lot landscaping and the buffer to the adjoining use to the north shall be constructed in accord with the standards in UDC 11-3B-8 and UDC 11-3B-9. A landscape plan complying with the aforementioned standards shall be submitted with the CZC and DES application. Although a landscape plan has not been submitted with the subject application, the proposed site plan will require the removal of existing trees. The applicant has coordinated with Elroy Huff, City Arborist, to confirm mitigation requirements. The applicant shall submit a mitigation plan with the CZC and DES application prior to removal of any trees on the site. K. Waterways (UDC 11-3A-6): The Hunter Lateral runs along the west boundary of this site. The applicant proposes to keep the waterway open and to locate the City’s 10-foot multi-use pathway adjacent to the lateral. The Hunter Lateral shall remain open unless otherwise waived by City Council in accord with UDC 11-3A-6. L. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing constructed on the site is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A- 7. No fencing is currently depicted on the site plan, but should fencing be proposed, a detail shall be submitted with the CZC and DES application. M. Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review: If approved, the applicant will be required to submit a CZC and DES application to establish the parking lot use and to ensure all site improvements comply with the provisions of the UDC and the conditions in this report prior to construction, in accord with UDC 11-5B-1. A detailed site and landscape plan and elevations for the maintenance building shall be submitted in accord with the provisions in Section VIII. N. Utilities (UDC 11-3A-21): Sanitary sewer and water are available to the subject site, however no new services are being proposed at this time. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the Applicant’s request for annexation and zoning as it will provide the parking space needed for the expanding ICOM campus. Council should also consider the Applicant’s request for a waiver to leave the Hunter Lateral open and not require it to be piped. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 7, 2019 – Page 204 of 537Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 246 of 576 EXHIBIT A Page 7 B. Commission: The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard these items on March 21, 2019. At the public hearing, the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject Annexation request. a. Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Dr. Robert Hasty, Applicant; Tamara Thompson, Applicant’s Representative ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Dr. Robert Hasty; Tamara Thompson iv. Written testimony: None v. Staff presenting application: Stephanie Leonard vi. Other staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony: i. None c. Key Issues of Discussion by Commission: i. Concern regarding safe pedestrian crossing from proposed parking lot across Central Drive to ICOM campus; ii. Alignment of the proposed access point with the existing ICOM parking lot access point to the south; iii. Wayfinding signage to encourage pedestrian crossing at Central and Locust Grove crosswalk; iv. Coordination with ACHD to install a hawk signal at the main parking lot entrance for pedestrian crossing from proposed parking lot; v. Other considerations and options for potential locations for additional parking; vi. Location of multi-use pathway in relation to pedestrian crossing; vii. ICOM student population maturity, amount of traffic and other student populations utilizing the area and Central Dr.; d. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. Strike condition 1.1.b requiring applicant to coordinate with property to the west to align parking lot access with existing parking lot to the south; e. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. The Applicant should work with ACHD to coordinate a crosswalk to direct pedestrian traffic safely across Central Dr. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 7, 2019 – Page 205 of 537Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 247 of 576 EXHIBIT A Page 8 C. Council: The Meridian City Council heard these items on April 23, 2019. At the public hearing, the Council approved the subject Annexation request. a. Summary of City Council Public Hearing: i. In favor: Tamara Thompson, Applicant’s Representative ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Tamara Thompson iv. Written testimony: None v. Staff presenting application: Stephanie Leonard vi. Other staff commenting on application: None b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony: i. None c. Key Issues of Discussion by Council: i. Parcel to west ownership and alignment of proposed drive aisle with existing parking lot drive aisle to south; di. Key Council Changes to Staff/Commission Recommendation ii. Council granted the waiver to allow the Hunter Lateral to remain open (see DA provision 1.1c.) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 7, 2019 – Page 206 of 537Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 248 of 576 EXHIBIT A Page 9 VII. EXHIBITS A. Annexation and Zoning Legal Description and Exhibit Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 7, 2019 – Page 207 of 537Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 249 of 576 EXHIBIT A Page 10 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 7, 2019 – Page 208 of 537Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 250 of 576 EXHIBIT A Page 11 B. Concept Site Plan Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 7, 2019 – Page 209 of 537Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 251 of 576 EXHIBIT A Page 12 C. Driveway Alignment Location Staff’s recommended location Approximate proposed location Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 7, 2019 – Page 210 of 537Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 252 of 576 EXHIBIT A Page 13 VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING 1. Annexation & Zoning 1.1 A Development Agreement (DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. Currently, a fee of $303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six (6) months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the site plan included in Section VII, and the provisions contained herein. b. The applicant shall relocate the proposed parking lot driveway to align with the existing driveway constructed on the ICOM property to the south. c. The Hunter Lateral shall is approved to remain open unless otherwise waived by City Council in accord with UDC 11-3A-6. d. Direct access to S. Locust Grove Rd. is prohibited; primary access shall be via E. Central Dr. only in accord with UDC 11-3A-3. e. Cross-access to the property to the north shall be required to allow for future redevelopment. A cross-access easement agreement shall be provided upon CZC and DES application submittal. f. All future development of the subject property shall comply with the City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of development. g. Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Administrative Design Review applications are required to be submitted to the Planning Division for approval of all future buildings/uses on the site, prior to applying for building permit. The site plan included with the CZC application shall include wayfinding signage that directs pedestrians from the parking area to the intersection of Locust Grove and Central for safe crossing. h. All structures shall be removed from the property within 60 days of annexation into the City. i. A 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement is required to be submitted to the Planning Division for the pathway (coordinate details with Kim Warren, Park’s Dept. 208-888-3579). B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 A street light plan will need to be included in the design plans submitted to the City of Meridian. Street light plan requirements are listed in Section 6-7 of the City's Design Standards. 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 7, 2019 – Page 211 of 537Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 253 of 576 EXHIBIT A Page 14 the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.2 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.3 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at 208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190. 2.4 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. 2.5 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.6 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.7 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.8 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.9 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.10 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. C. IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT (ITD) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink8/0/doc/162132/Page1.aspx D. NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT (NMID) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink8/0/doc/162100/Page1.aspx Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 7, 2019 – Page 212 of 537Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 254 of 576 EXHIBIT A Page 15 C. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone (UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission, the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone, the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Applicant is proposing to annex the subject 2.34 acre property with a C-G zoning district and develop an off-site parking lot expansion for the Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine. Commission finds that the proposed map amendment and uses comply with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and should be compatible with the adjacent commercial uses. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Commission finds that the proposed map amendment to the C-G zoning district is consistent with the purpose statement for the commercial districts in UDC 11-2B-1 and will serve the surrounding educational institutions. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The Commission finds that the proposed zoning map amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. The Commission recommends the Council consider any oral or written testimony that may be provided when determining this finding. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including, but not limited to, school districts; and The Commission finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not result in any adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site. 5. The annexation (as applicable) is in the best interest of city. The Commission finds annexing this property with a C-G zoning district is in the best interest of the City if the applicant develops the site in accord with the proposed site plan and the development agreement requires that future development receive CZC and DES approval. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 7, 2019 – Page 213 of 537Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 255 of 576 Lj�/rE IDIAN*,----- CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 P Project File Name/Number: Item Title: Award of Change Order No. 8To The Ewing Company, Inc. Meeting Notes: For the "WRRF Headworks Expansion" Project for a Not - to -Exceed amount of $292,860.38. M I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.P. Presenter: Consent Estimated Time for P resentation: Consent Title of I tem - Award of C hange Order No. 8 to T he E wing Company, Inc. for the “WRRF Headworks Expansion” P roject for a Not-To-E xceed amount of $292,860.38. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate Council Memo C over Memo 5/16/2019 Change Order #8 C over Memo 5/16/2019 Change Order Back Up Docs C over Memo 5/16/2019 Contract C hecklist C over Memo 5/16/2019 B udget R eport C over Memo 5/16/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate F inance.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/16/2019 - 12:10 P M F inance.B aird, Ted Approved 5/16/2019 - 2:25 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 263 of 576 Page 1 Memo To: Chris Johnson, Interim City Clerk, From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Manager CC: Troy Thrall, Clint Dolsby Date: 5/15/2018 Re: May 21 st City Council Meeting Agenda Item The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the May 21 st City Council Consent Agenda for Council’s consideration. Award of Change Order No. 8 to The Ewing Company, Inc. for the “WRRF Headworks Expansion” project for a Not-To-Exceed amount of $292,860.38. Recommended Council Action: Approval of Change Order No. 8 to The Ewing Company, Inc. for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $292,860.38 and authorize the Purchasing Manager to sign. Thank you for your consideration. City of Meridian Purchasing Dept. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 264 of 576 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a M a y 2 1 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 2 6 5 o f 5 7 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a M a y 2 1 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 2 6 6 o f 5 7 6 Change Proposal Requests (CPR) and Field Orders CPR #23 Mechanical room door size - pricing complete Description Summary: Why is Change Necessary: Reason for change: Cost Negotiation Process: Final Cost= $3,265.63 Work Days=0 Work includes modifying the width of Door 202-1, located on the upper level of the Headworks Building, to 8'-8". This was an error in the plans. Drawing A-110-0721 shows the width incorrectly as 6'-4". The Ewing Company ordered the door/frame from the incorrect information and was not able to return it for credit. The design consultant will reimburse the City for the cost of this change. The door needs to be 8'-8" wide so that equipment on the upper level of the Headworks Building can be removed and replaced in the future. The Ewing Company initially submitted CPR 23 to the City PM, City inspector, and B&C for their review and comment. Labor cost breakdowns and material costs were provided to the reviewers. The proposed costs were found to be appropriate for the scope of work. The CPR was recommended by B&C and the costs were approved. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 267 of 576 CPR #27 Anchor bolts owner supply equipment at IPS Description Summary: Why is Change Necessary: Reason for change: Cost Negotiation Process: Final Cost= $549.41 Work Days=0 CPR #28 re-route 42" PI per WCD #13 Description Summary: Why is Change Necessary: The City purchased the Hidrostal pumps for the Influent Pump Station and provided them to The Ewing Company to install. The anchor bolts for the pump guide rails were not included in the scope of supply from Hidrostal and need to be provided by The Ewing Company. The anchor bolts are needed to secure the pump guide rail systems to the wall of the wet well in the Influent Pump Station. The approved submittal for the Hidrostal pumps specifically excludes anchor bolts for the guide rails. The bolts were not called out in the bid documents and not included in the contract price for The Ewing Company. Therefore The Ewing Company is providing them at additional cost. The Ewing Company submitted CPR 27 to the City PM, City inspector, and B&C for their review and comment. Cost breakdowns and material costs were provided to the reviewers. Labor cost for installing the bolts was not included as this part of the work is covered in the contract price for the Ewing Company. The proposed costs were found to be appropriate for the scope of work. The CPR was recommended by B&C and the costs were approved. Work includes modifying the pipe material and alignment of the 42-inch Primary Influent (PI) sewer and 6-inch Primary Sludge (PS) force main in the area surrounding the Primary Clarifier (PC) #3. The revised alignment and vertical layout requires existing electrical/fiber conduits that parallel the new 42-inch PI to be temporarily relocated and replaced. The City does not have records of where underground electrical and fiber optic utilities are located in this area. The Ewing Company conducted exploratory excavation in this area and it became clear the pipe alignment in the bid documents would be in conflict with electrical utilities. B&C altered the design to route the 42-inch pipe through this area. Due to the type and number of fittings needed to achieve the revised alignment it was necessary that a portion of the pipe be changed from HDPE to C-905 PVC with flange connections. This increased the cost of the work because the HDPE pipe had already been purchased. The extra HDPE pipe will become property of the City. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 268 of 576 Reason for change: Cost Negotiation Process: Final Cost= $198,256.74 Work Days=30 CPR #29A slab at IPS manifold Description Summary: Why is Change Necessary: Reason for change: The Ewing Company submitted CPR 28 to the City PM, City inspector, and B&C for their review and comment. Backup documentation was provided to the reviewers. The proposed cost was found to be appropriate for the scope of work and materials/equipment being provided, thus being recommended by BC. The CPR cost was approved. The primary influent sewer is necessary to connect the existing primary clarifier junction box to the new Influent Pump Station. Due to unforeseen conditions electrical utilities are being realigned and a change in pipe material was necessary in order to construct the pipe. This change includes replacement of 11 individual 3'x3' concrete pads under the Influent Pump Station pipe header supports with a single 54' x 12' concrete pad. B&C determined that 18" of rock chips under the slab would be necessary to prevent frost heave. This change will make operation and maintenance of the Influent Pump Station easier and is supported by plant staff. The Ewing Company was willing to provide the additional concrete, rebar and rock chips at their cost with no mark-ups because they preferred to install a single large pad rather than 11 small ones. This change will make operation and maintenance of the influent pump station easier at minimal additional cost to the City. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 269 of 576 Cost Negotiation Process: Final Cost= $3,737.00 Work Days= 0 CPR #30 Temp power re-route Description Summary: Why is Change Necessary: Reason for change: Cost Negotiation Process: Final Cost= $69,088.07 Work Days=19 The Ewing Company submitted CPR 29 to the City PM, City inspector, and B&C for their review and comment. Breakdowns of additional material costs were provided. After review B&C recommended that additional rock chips be provided. The Ewing Company submitted a revised version, CPR 29A. The proposed costs were reviewed and are considered to be in line with the standard for this type of work. The proposed cost was found to be appropriate and was recommended for approval by BC. The CPR cost was approved. The work includes providing a temporary relocation of overhead power lines and underground service feed to the Digester Building pad mounted transformer. The scope of work includes: (1) Removal of an existing underground riser and associated fused cutouts and conductors (2) Installation of a new underground riser and associated fused cutouts and conductors (3) installation of a sidewalk guy and switch on existing 50-foot pole (4) installation of a new 50- foot pole and associated down guy, switch/arrestor assembly and underground riser (5) installation of one span of overhead 12.47-kV conductor (6) removal of existing overhead wire and poles (7) relocation of a light pole that is in conflict with the new electrical work. Relocation of these lines will allow installation of site piping to proceed without interruption of electrical service while maintaining the 15-kV electrical loop onsite. The reason this change is necessary is to support the installation of permanent primary power electrical work outlined in Work Change Directive No. 008. At the time of design of the headworks improvements it was not known if the City would be taking ownership of the plant electrical system and the design of permanent primary power improvements had not yet been started. The Ewing Company submitted CPR 30 to the City PM, City inspector, and B&C for their review and comment. Breakdowns of labor costs, as well as material costs were provided. The proposed time and costs were reviewed and are considered to be in line with the standard for this type of work. The proposed cost was found to be appropriate and was recommended for approval by BC. The CPR cost was approved. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 270 of 576 CPR #31 install 8x8 ledger per FO #11 Description Summary: Why is Change Necessary Reason for change: Cost Negotiation Process: Final Cost= $13,328.09 Work Days=7 CPR #32 lower transducer mount Description Summary: Why is Change Necessary: The Ewing Company submitted CPR 31 to the City PM, City inspector, and B&C for their review and comment. Breakdowns of labor costs, as well as material costs were provided. The proposed time and costs were reviewed and are considered to be in line with the standard for this type of work. The proposed cost was found to be appropriate and was recommended for approval by BC. The CPR cost was approved. Work includes labor and materials for installing additional veneer relieving ledger angles at two levels on the West Headworks Building elevation for the wall adjacent to the grit removal tanks. The change is necessary to reduce the chances of the veneer on the west wall from cracking in the future if there is differential settling of the structure. This entire veneer wall sits on ledger angle instead of a cast-in-place concrete ledger because of the grating in this area over the Headcell tanks (see Section 1 on S-110-0707). The Ewing Company has the bottom ledger installed correctly per that detail so this is two additional rows of ledger further up the wall. The structural engineer indicated that the bottom ledger is strong enough to support the block veneer, but putting two additional rows will limit future cracking in the veneer that may occur due to differential settlement. Work includes lowering the mounting plates for radar level transducers at the Influent Pump Station to avoid a conflict that would keep the floor hatches above the transducers from closing. This includes welding a continuous section of 3" wide x 1/2" thick stainless steel flat around the sides of the mounting plate and bottom of the angles around the opening to keep the level transmitter vaults isolated from the wetwell. The design was based on a Siemens LR250 level transducer with encapsulated antenna. The product approved in submittal review was a Siemens LR250 level transducer with horn antenna. The approved antenna is approximately 4 inches taller than the unit used for the design basis. The extra 4 inches would interfere with the hatch door above. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 271 of 576 Reason for change: Cost Negotiation Process: Final Cost= $1,688.71 Work Days=0 CPR #33 Drain Wye Repair Description Summary: Why is Change Necessary: Reason for change: Repairing the damaged wye prevented contamination of soil and made the drain line functional again. The reason for the change is to accommodate the approved level transducer so it can be mounted without interfering with the hatch door and there will be no gaps between the bottom of the concrete deck and the top of the mounting plate. The Ewing Company submitted CPR 32 to the City PM, City inspector, and B&C for their review and comment. Breakdowns of labor costs, as well as material costs were provided. The proposed labor and material costs were reviewed and are considered to be appropriate for this type of work. The CPR cost was approved recommended by B&C and approved by City staff. Work includes replacement of a buried 8-inch wye on a drain line at the Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility. The existing wye was found to be damaged when the contractor was performing exploratory excavation near the primary clarifiers. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 272 of 576 Cost Negotiation Process: Final Cost= $2,946.73 Work Days=0 Total Cost= $292,860.38 Total Work Days =56 The Ewing Company submitted CPR 33 to the City PM, City inspector, and B&C for their review and comment. Breakdowns of labor costs, as well as material costs were provided. The labor and material costs were reviewed and are considered to be appropriate for this type of work and are comparable to prices we have seen on similar work previously done on the project. The proposed cost was found to be appropriate and was recommended for approval by BC. The CPR cost was approved. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 273 of 576 CONTRACT CHECKLIST Date: REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Project Name: Project Manager: Contract Amount: Contractor/Consultant/Design Engineer: Is this a change order? Yes No Change Order No. Fund: Budget Available ( Purchasing attach report ): Department Yes No Construction GL Account FY Budget: Task Order Project Number: Enhancement: Yes No Professional Service Equipment Will the project cross fiscal years? Yes No Grant Grant #: Wage Determination Received Wage Verification 10 Days prior to bid due date Debarment Status (Federal Funded) Print and Attach the determination Print, attach and amend bid by addendum (if changed) www.sam.gov Print and attach Master Agreement Category (Bid Results Attached) Yes No (Ratings Attached) Yes No Date MSA Roster Approved: Typical Award Yes No If no please state circumstances and conclusion: Date Award Posted: 7 day protest period ends: PW License Expiration Date: Corporation Status Insurance Certificates Received (Date): Expiration Date: Rating: Payment and Performance Bonds Received (Date): Rating: Builders Risk Ins. Req'd: Yes No (Only applicabale for projects above $1,000,000) Reason Consultant Selected 1 Performance on past projects Check all that apply Quality of work On Budget On Time Accuracy of Construction Est 2 Qualified Personnel 3 Availability of personnel 4 Local of personnel Description of negotiation process and fee evaluation: Date Submitted to Clerk for Agenda: By: Purchase Order No.: Date Issued: WH5 submitted (Only for PW Construction Projects) NTP Date: Contract Request Checklist.5.24.2016.Final $292,860.38 Troy Thrall If yes, has policy been purchased? The Ewing Company III. Contract Type II. BUDGET INFORMATION (Project Manager to Complete) 60 3590 96164 10044 TASK ORDER RFP / RFQ BID VII. TASK ORDER SELECTION (Project Manager to Complete) 4/25/2017 Award based on Low Bid Highest Ranked Vendor Selected VIII. AWARD INFORMATION Approval Date Enter Supervisor Name Date Approved May 15, 2019 I. PROJECT INFORMATION 4/1/2020 N/A 8 FY19 5/15/2019 PW WRRF Headworks Expansion V. BASIS OF AWARD N/A N/A IV. GRANT INFORMATION - to be completed only on Grant funded projects VI. CONTRACTOR / CONSULTANT REQUIRED INFORMATION N/A N/A N/A N/A Good Standing PWC-C-12003 7/31/2019 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 274 of 576 City Of Meridian Detailed Statement of Revenues and Expenditures - Rev and Exp Report - Keith 60 - Enterprise Fund 3590 - WW Construction Projects From 10/1/2018 Through 9/30/2019 Amendments Budget with Actual Current Year Remaining Budget Remaining Budget Percent of Capital Outlay 96164 Headworks Improvements 121,463.35 0.00 121,463.35 100.00% 10044 Headworks/Fine Screens 482,433.96 1,037.93 481,396.03 99.78% 10044.F WRRF Headworks Exp. Project - Perforated Plate Screens 52,240.00 52,240.00 0.00 0.00% 10044.i WRRF Headworks Expansion - Construction 2,961,411.52 2,961,411.52 0.00 0.00% 10044.J WRRF Hidrostal Pumps for the Headworks Capacity Expansion 116,573.70 116,573.70 0.00 0.00% 10044.k WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion Construction Surveying 14,350.00 14,350.00 0.00 0.00% 10044.L Headworks Capacity Expansion Services During Construction 278,756.88 278,756.88 0.00 0.00% 10044.M WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion Special Inspections 18,811.50 18,811.50 0.00 0.00% 10044.N WRRF Process Control Software Integration 96,845.54 96,845.54 0.00 0.00% Total Capital Outlay 4,142,886.45 3,540,027.07 602,859.38 14.55% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,142,886.45 3,540,027.07 602,859.38 14.55% Date: 5/15/19 12:15:54 PM Page: 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 275 of 576 ( �� /�E IDIZ IA*,-----,NDAHO CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 Q Project File Name/Number: Item Title: Professional Services Agreement with Brian Schreiner Meeting Notes: For Artwork for Traffic Box Community Art Project for a Not -to -Exceed amount $300 7� I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.Q. Presenter: Hillary B lackstone Estimated Time for P resentation: 0 Title of I tem - Professional Services Agreement for Artwor k for T raffic Box C ommunity Art Project with Brian S chreiner for Not-to-Exceed $300 MA C selected Boston Terrier f or a traf f ic box wrap at the pedestrian signal at Meridian & J ames C ourt. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate L icense A greement S chreiner A greements / C ontracts 5/13/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/13/2019 - 6:07 P M Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/13/2019 - 6:08 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 276 of 576 ARTWORK LICENSE AGREEMENT: TRAFFIC BOX COMMUNITY ART PROJECT This ARTWORK LICENSE AGREEMENT: TRAFFIC BOX COMMUNITY ART PROJECT ("Agreement") is made this��day of --d 2019 ("Effective Date"), by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under We lws of the State of Idaho ("City"), and Brian Schreiner, an individual person ("Artist"). WHEREAS, the City desires that public art will be a component of our community, and to that end, the Meridian Arts Commission ("MAC") issued the Call for Artists attached hereto as Exhibit A, seeking proposals for the inclusion of artwork in the Traffic Box Art Image Repository, a repository of images portraying artwork available for production of vinyl wraps to be installed on traffic signal boxes in Meridian as derivative works, with permission from the property owner Ada County Highway District, as part of the Traffic Box Community Art Project ("Project"), as a benefit to the public; WHEREAS, Artist submitted a response to the Call for Artists, which response included the Application and Acknowledgments and letter of intent attached hereto as Exhibit B; WHEREAS, on June 1, 2017, the Meridian Arts Commission reviewed the responses to the Call for Artists, recommended works appropriate for inclusion in the Traffic Box Art Image Repository based on their respectively submitted proposals, including the piece of art entitled Boston Terrier, depicted in Exhibit C hereto ("Artwork") submitted by Artist, and on June 20, 2017, Meridian City Council accepted such recommendation, creating the Traffic Box Art Image Repository via Resolution no. 17-2017; WHEREAS, Artist wishes to participate in the Project by allowing the Artwork to be scanned and formatted in order to depict a derivative work of the Artwork on a vinyl wrap installation on a traffic control box, subject to the following terms and conditions; NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and agreed, the Parties agree as follows: I. SCOPE. A. License; alterations. Artist grants to City an irrevocable license to digitally and/or photographically produce a derivative work from the image of the original Artwork, print such image or portion(s) thereof on one or more vinyl wraps ("Vinyl Wrap"), install the Vinyl Wrap as a derivative work on one or more traffic control boxes in Meridian, Idaho, and authorize third parties to do the same. Artist acknowledges and agrees that the process of photographing, digitizing, printing, and/or reproducing the image of Artwork on a vinyl wrap or wraps may require that the image, or portions thereof, be cropped, resized, or otherwise altered in order to transfer the image of the original Artwork onto a traffic control box as a derivative work of the Artwork, or for any other purpose, in City's sole discretion. B. Delivery of Artwork; purpose. Artist shall allow City to temporarily take possession of the original Artwork for the purpose of creating a digital image of the Artwork, printing such image or portions thereof on the Vinyl Wrap, and installing the Vinyl Wrap as a derivative work on one or more traffic control boxes in Meridian, Idaho. City shall not provide insurance to cover loss, theft, or damage of original Artwork and/or of Artist's person, property, or interests. Insurance of original Artwork shall be in Artist's sole discretion and responsibility. Artist shall bear any and all risks of and actual loss, theft, and/or damage to the original Artwork. C. Copyright. Artist and City agree that the Vinyl Wrap shall constitute a derivative work of the Artwork with a separate copyright. Artist shall maintain any copyright in the original Artwork. City shall maintain ARTWORK LICENSE. AGREEMENT: TRAFFIC BOX COMMUNITY ART PROJECT PAGE. 1 ARTWORK LICENSE AGREEMENT : TRAFFIC BOX COMMUNITY ART PROJECT PAGE 2 the copyright of the derivative work and any product or component thereof, including the Vinyl Wrap created therefrom, which shall belong wholly to the City, and Artist shall not make any claim thereto. As to the derivative work: 1. Artist expressly waives any and all right, title, or interest in the images or products created using the derivative work. Artist understands that this waiver includes waivers of the exclusive rights of reproduction, adaptation, publication, and display. 2. Artist agrees to relinquish and waive any and all rights, title, and interest to the derivative work, images thereof, or images of any portion thereof, including, but not limited to, the rights afforded artists under the Copyright Act of 1976 and the Visual Arts Rights Act of 1990, Title 17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq . Artist understands and agrees that the right of attribution and integrity, as specifically set forth in 17 U.S.C. § 106A, are hereby expressly waived except as otherwise provided herein. To the extent that the provisions of this Agreement differ with the Copyright Act of 1976 and Visual Arts Rights Act of 1990, the provisions of this Agreement will govern and any such differences in the rights and duties created thereunder are expressly waived. D. Artist is creator of Artwork. Artist warrants and represents that Artist is the sole creator of the Artwork; and that Artist is the lawful owner of all rights in the Artwork and the content depicted therein. E. Ownership. City shall own the digital image created from Artwork and any derivative work arising from a portion or product thereof, including the Vinyl Wrap created therefrom. The installation location(s) of the Vinyl Wrap created as derivative works from Artwork, if any, will be selected in the City’s sole discretion, and once installed, City or other duly authorized party may modify or remove, or allow modification or removal of same, in City’s sole discretion. Artist specifically waives the right to claim any remedy concerning the alteration of any image of Artwork or portion thereof for preparation of the derivative work, including the Vinyl Wrap created therefrom. City shall not be obligated by this Agreement to install any Vinyl Wrap featuring the digital image of Artwork or any portion thereof. F. Payment. City shall make total payment to Artist for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement in the amount of three hundred dollars ($300.00). This payment shall constitute full compensation from City to Artist for any and all services, costs, and expenses related to services performed under this Agreement. Artist shall be responsible for payment of any and all taxes due and owing for payment received under this Agreement. G. Photographs. Artist consents to City’s publication and/or use of any photographs or recordings of Artist, Artwork, derivative works created using Artwork, and/or the Vinyl Wrap for promotional purposes. II. TERMS AND CONDITIONS A. Acknowledgment. Artist acknowledges that activity undertaken in conjunction with this Agreement presents risks, some of which are unknown, and agrees to assume all such risks. B. Indemnification; waiver. Artist shall indemnify, save and hold harmless, release and forever discharge City and its agents and employees from and for any and all losses, claims, actions, judgments for damages, or injury to persons or property and losses and expenses caused or incurred by Artist or City in the course of any activity associated with this Agreement not caused by or arising out of the tortious conduct of City, regardless of the manner by which such claim may be brought. C. Relationship of Parties. Artist is an independent contractor and is not an employee, agent, joint venturer, or partner of City. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted or construed as creating or establishing the relationship of employer and employee between Artist and City or between Artist and any official, agent, or employee of City. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 278 of 576 D. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the Parties. This Agreement supersedes any and all statements, promises, or inducements made by either party, or agents of either party, whether oral or written. The terms of this Agreement may not be enlarged, modified or altered except upon written agreement signed by both parties hereto. E. Agreement governed by Idaho law. The laws of the State of Idaho shall govern the validity, interpretation, performance and enforcement of this Agreement. Venue shall be in the courts of Ada County, Idaho. F. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected. G. Successors and assigns. All of the terms, provisions, covenants and conditions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon, each party and their successors, assigns, legal representatives, heirs, executors, and administrators. H. Advice of attorney. Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement, it has received independent legal advice from its attorneys or the opportunity to seek such advice. I. Exhibits. All exhibits to this Agreement are incorporated by reference and made a part of hereof as if the exhibits were set forth in their entirety herein. J. City Council approval required. The validity of this Agreement shall be expressly conditioned upon City Council action approving the Agreement. Execution of this Agreement by the persons referenced below prior to such ratification or approval shall not be construed as proof of validity in the absence of Meridian City Council approval. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the Effective Date first written above. A Bri -einer CITY OF MERIDIAN: BY: jTa0eee rd, Mayor Attest:V P-IEU `{u"", City 1 Q a city or E IDDAH IDAHO s� SEAL F'po(!he Tg"-: ARTWORK LICENSE AGREEMENT: TRAFFIC Box COMMUNITY ART PROJECT PAGE 3 ARTWORK LICENSE AGREEMENT : TRAFFIC BOX COMMUNITY ART PROJECT PAGE 4 EXHIBIT A CALL FOR ARTISTS Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 280 of 576 ARTWORK LICENSE AGREEMENT : TRAFFIC BOX COMMUNITY ART PROJECT PAGE 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 281 of 576 ARTWORK LICENSE AGREEMENT : TRAFFIC BOX COMMUNITY ART PROJECT PAGE 6 EXHIBIT B APPLICATION MATERIALS Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 282 of 576 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 283 of 576 Brian Schreiner 11055 Wampum Drive Boise, Idaho 83713 208) 377-2398 May 18, 2017 To Whom It May Concern; I am writing this letter of intent to apply for the Traffic Box Art Image Repository. As a fine art and commercial artist, I believe in exposing individuals who in in neighborhoods and the public at large to art. I believe that art can make people happy. The bright colors in my 3 art pieces that I am submitting are uplifting. The Jumping Trout, Peace Dove and Jumping Dog are designed to uplift a person’s spirits while passing them while driving by a park, fishing pond or school. I appreciate your consideration of my work and look forward to hearing from you. I am including a short biography at the bottom of this letter for your review. Sincerely, Brian Schreiner Biographical Information Brian Schreiner Using watercolor and acrylic paint, Brian creates pictures of Idaho, California, and throughout the West, including Yosemite and the Grand Canyon. He earned a BFA and teaching credentials from Boise State University and attended architecture school at the University of Idaho leading to restaurant design and mural painting opportunities. Brian currently lives in Boise with his wife, Cindy and is the father of 2 grown daughters, Tara and Katie and has 2 grandsons Drew and Kody. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 284 of 576 ARTWORK LICENSE AGREEMENT : TRAFFIC BOX COMMUNITY ART PROJECT PAGE 9 EXHIBIT C BOSTON T ERRIER Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 285 of 576 �irEDAHO IDIZ IAN,+ CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 R Project File Name/Number: Item Title: Resolution 19-2141 Meeting Notes: A Resolution of the Mayor and The City Council of the City of Meridian Authorizing the City Clerk to Destroy Certain Semi -Permanent and Temporary Records of the City of Meridian; and providing an effective date I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.R . Presenter: Estimated Time for P resentation: Title of I tem - Resolution No. 19-2141: A Resolution Of T he M ayor And T he City Council Of T he C ity Of M eridian Authorizing T he City Clerk To Destr oy Certain Semi-P ermanent And Temporary Records Of T he City Of M eridian; And Providing An E ffective Date. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate Resolution R esolution 5/15/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/15/2019 - 3:22 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 286 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 1 OF 36 CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 19-2141 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, MILAM, PALMER, LITTLE ROBERTS A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO DESTROY CERTAIN SEMI- PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY RECORDS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS , the Mayor and City Council have the authority pursuant to Idaho Code section 50-907(7) to, by resolution, destroy semi-permanent and temporary records, upon the advice of the City Attorney, and with such disposition to be under the direction and supervision of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, upon the advice of the City Attorney, the City Clerk has identified certain semi- permanent and temporary records that may be destroyed pursuant to Idaho Code sections 50-907(2) and (3) because the time period for retention of such records has expired. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section 1. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized to direct and supervise the destruction of the following semi-permanent and temporary records of the City of Meridian: 2019 City-Wide Record Destruction List Semi-Permanent Records Record Description Years City Attorney’s Office Bankruptcy Notices and Case Files Records documenting notification to the city that certain individuals have filed for bankruptcy, and used to determine if the individual owes money to the city and to file notice or claim with the court. Information may include: debtor’s name, utility accounts information, prepared repayment plan and related documentation. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Civil Case Files Pending and closed cases filed by and against the city, including all pre-litigation, litigation, appellate documents Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 287 of 576 Section 2. That the City Clerk is authorized to take all necessary steps to destroy the records as provided by this Resolution. Section 3. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 2 day of May, 2019. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this day of May, 2019. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY-WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 35 OF 36 date of service, equipment number, make, model, etc. Public Works Backflow $10 Credit Electronic report for customers Log who have their backflow tests Destroy records dated December completed by their City- 31, 2015 and older mandated annual due date. Backflow Tests Backflow assemblies test report. Destroy records dated December 31, 2015 and older Correspondence, Engineering transmittals (not Destroy records dated December Engineering project -related), serviceability 31, 2015 and older letters, Letters of Interest Daily Chlorine Field notes from Chlorine Residuals residuals taken from various Destroy records dated December sample ports in the City water 31, 2015 and older system. Maintenance Request Records documenting requests Record and responses thereto concerning a variety of maintenance responsibilities carried out by the Public Works Department. Examples include, Destroy records dated December but are not limited to: brushing 31, 2016 and older and limbing, road grading, rocking, sealing, patching, and marking, traffic signals and signs, City -owned buildings and equipment, and water and sewer system problems. Safety Audits Health and Safety Audits. Destroy records dated December 311 2015 and older Section 2. That the City Clerk is authorized to take all necessary steps to destroy the records as provided by this Resolution. Section 3. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 2 day of May, 2019. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this day of May, 2019. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY-WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 35 OF 36 APPROVED: B: Mayor Tam8�Weerd L"T �ED AuATTEST:BNe�A� Chris J son, Interi RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY-WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 36 OF 36 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 2 OF 36 (complaints, summons, investigations, reports, attorney notes, discovery-related records, pleadings, affidavits, motions, deposition transcripts, disposition, orders and judgments, exhibits, appeals, and related records), and bankruptcy files. Departmental Reports Reports prepared by the city attorney for the mayor and city council. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Land Use Appeals Appeals of land use decisions, including staff reports, pleadings, briefs, and related records. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Legal Opinions, Memoranda Formal and informal opinions and memoranda rendered by the city attorney for the mayor, city council, or city departments, examining legal questions relating to state/federal law/rules or local ordinances/policies. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Claim Files Claims for damages filed by and against the city, including claims caused by city employees/ equipment, including Property Damage Records, Liability Claims Records, Public Injury Reports, and related correspondence. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Insurance Policy Records Records documenting the terms and conditions of city insurance policies covering liability, property, motor vehicle, etc. Records usually include: policies, endorsements, rate change notices, agent of record, and related documents. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older City Clerk’s Office Correspondence Records created or received in the course of administering city policies, procedures or programs, Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 288 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 3 OF 36 but these records do not provide insight into significant policy, procedure or program discussions or decisions. Audio/Video Recordings Audio and video recordings of City Council, Commission and Committee Meetings. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Contracts & Agreements to which the City is a Party Agreements with vendors and other parties for the acquisition, lease, lease-purchase or sale of equipment, supplies, services or property, letters of credit, warranty surety agreements which have been approved at a City Council meeting, approved by the Mayor, or have been recorded with Ada County. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Permits & Licenses Records relating to city permits and licenses issued in the City Clerk’s Office. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Commissions, Committees, and Boards – Excludes Planning & Zoning and City Council Audio Recordings Audio recordings of commission, committee, or board meetings Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Minutes Summary or verbatim minutes of commission, committee, or board meetings; documents and other written or visual materials presented at meetings ( e.g ., handouts, photos, presentations, etc.) Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Community Development Department Administrative – All Divisions: (Community Development(CD) Departmental/Operational, Building Services, Economic Development, Land Development, Planning, (Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) and Current/Long Range Planning) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 289 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 4 OF 36 Committee/Ad-Hoc Team Records Agendas and meeting minutes/notes for special groups convened by Community Development for specific purposes such as understanding operational gaps, Code issues, and process delays. Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older Correspondence Records created or received in the course of administering city policies, procedures, or programs, but these records do not provide insight into significant policy, procedure, or program discussions or decisions, including, but not limited to: citizen response letters, change of address notifications including corner lot change of address, and street name changes. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Department Guidelines, Policies, Procedures, Processes and Reports Departmental records created or received in the course of administering departmental policies, procedures, or programs, but these records do not provide insight into significant policy, procedure, program, discussions, or decisions. Including, but not limited to: citizen respo nse letters. Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older Zoning Verification Letter Documents, including, but not limited to: written requests for zoning analysis of a specific parcel/property and the responsive departmental opinion Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Land Development Division – Commercial and Government Buildings Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 290 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 5 OF 36 Land Development Commercial and Governments Project Files Files or documents created and/or used in the land development phase of a commercial project, including but not limited to: approval letters, QLPE letters, soil reports, and drainage calculations. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Land Development Division – Non-Commercial and Non-Government Buildings (Residential) Land Development Non- Commercial and Non- Government (Residential) Project Files Files or documents created or used in the land development phase of a residential or commercial subdivision project, including, but not limited to: approval letters, QLPE letters, soil report, and drainage calculations. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Permits and Inspection Records – All Land Development (Accela Record ID’s) Files or documents created and/or used in the land developments phase of all Governmental, Commercial, or Residential/Commercial Subdivision projects with Accela ID’s (LD-DEV, LD- CLOT, LD-RSUB, LD- CSUB, LD-CAP, LD-MISC, LD-WSA). Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Planning Divisions Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Sub Recipient Agreements and Supporting Documents Documents, including, but not limited to: agreements, Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER), sub- recipient agreements, environmental review records, PSAs (and corresponding products), sub-recipient reporting documents (activity reports, draw requests, labor files), etc. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Planning Division –Administrative Applications Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 291 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 6 OF 36 Sign: Planned Sign Program; No longer issuing, but still have existing records Documents, including, but not limited to: approved application, and sign requirements for a specific project. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and before that have letters of revocation. Sign: Limited Duration Documents, including, but not limited to: application, associated checklist items, and approved sign design/drawings. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Time Extension Documents including, but not limited to: application, staff report, and decision letter. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Finance Department Correspondence Records created or received in the course of administering city policies, procedures or programs, but these records do not provide insight into significant policy, procedure or program discussions or decisions. Including but not limited to Citizen Response letters, billing adjustment requests, etc. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Accounts Payable Records documenting payment of city bills, including reports, invoices, check stubs, purchase orders, payment authorizations. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Accounts Receivable Records documenting billing and collection of monies owed to the city by vendors, citizens, Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 292 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 7 OF 36 organizations, governments, etc. Records include: reports, receipts, invoices, statements, etc. Information typically includes: receipt amount, date, invoice number, name, account number, account balance, adjustments, etc. Cash Receipts Receipt and supporting documentation Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Grant Records Records documenting the application, evaluation, awarding, administration, reporting and status of grants applied for, received, awarded or administered by the city. Records include: applications and proposals, summaries, objectives, activities, budgets, exhibits, award notices, progress reports, contracts, financial reports, and related correspondence and documentation. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Sales & Use Tax Forms Used to report and remit sales tax collected and due to the state. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Travel Records Records documenting requests, authorizations, reimbursements, and other actions related to employee travel, including expense reports and receipts, vouchers and related documents. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Financial Reports Quarterly Published Reports documenting the financial condition and operation of the city, Reports include information on revenues and expenditures in relation to the final budget. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 293 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 8 OF 36 Financial Reports Year End Reports and data used to document the financial condition and operation of the city, sub ledgers related to, but not including the final Audit Report. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Bank Transaction Records Records documenting the status and transaction activity of city bank accounts, including account statements. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Budget Records Records used in preparing and adopting the city budget, including revenue projections, instructions, department requests, worksheets, council- approved tentative budget and notice of budget hearing, adopted appropriations ordinance and amendments, and other information. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Cancelled checks Bank record of account transactions. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Capital Asset Records – Purchase Record of purchase, vendor invoice and related documents. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Capital Asset Records – Disposal Record of disposal, department request of disposal. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Gift and Contribution Records Records documenting gifts and contributions to the city. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Investment Records Reports, statements, summaries, correspondence and other records documenting and tracking investments made by the city, including the Local Government Investment Pool. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Accounting Software Records Transaction records within the Accounting Software system: including – payroll, vendor listing, vendor payments, vendor Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 294 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 9 OF 36 purchase orders, budget transactions, cash receipts, and general ledger. Departmental Reports Reports documenting the financial condition and operation of the city, issued on a monthly, quarterly, annual or other basis, including quarterly published treasurer’s report and year-end financial reports. Reports include information on revenues and expenditures in relation to the final budget. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older General Ledgers Records documenting the summary of accounts reflecting the financial position of the city, showing debit, credit and balance amounts per account, budget, fund and department, asset depreciation, and totals for notes receivable, interest income, amounts due from other funds, bank loans received, cash in escrow, deferred loans received, cash, revenue, accounts receivable, accounts payable, etc. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Journal Entries Records including detailed reports and back up documentation for journal entries Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Administrative Reports Reports, statistical studies, and other records designed and used for budget preparation, projections, workload and personnel management, and research and general reference. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Deduction Authorization Records Records documenting employee authorization for voluntary payroll deductions. Records may include: direct bank deposits, insurance applications, enrollment cards, deduction authorizations, approval notices, Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 295 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 10 OF 36 deduction terminations, and related records. Federal & State Tax Records Records, in addition to those itemized in this section, used to report the collection, distribution, deposit, and transmittal of federal and state income taxes as well as social security tax. Examples include: the federal miscellaneous income statement (1099), employers’ quarterly federal tax return (941, 941E), tax deposit coupon (8109), and similar federal and state completed forms. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Garnishment Record Records documenting requests and court orders to withhold wages from employee earnings for garnishments, tax levies, support payments, and other reasons. Usually includes original writs of garnishment, orders to withhold, federal or state tax levies, recapitulations of amounts withheld, and related records. Information usually includes: employee name and social security number, name of agency ordering garnishment, amount, name of party to whom payment is submitted, dates, and related data. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Registers Year End Payroll Registers: Registers or records serving the same function of documenting the earnings, voluntary and required deductions, and withholdings of city employees. Information usually includes employee name and social security number, hours worked, rate, overtime, vacation value, various allowance, gross pay, federal Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 296 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 11 OF 36 and state withholding, voluntary deductions, net pay, and related data. Time Records Records documenting hours worked, leave hours accrued, and leave hours taken by city employees. Information usually includes: employee name and employee number, hours worked, type and number of leave hours taken, total hours, dates and related data. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older W2s Annual statements documenting individual employee earnings and withholdings for state and federal income taxes and social security tax, also known as federal tax form W-2. Information includes: city name and tax identification number, employee name and social security number, wages paid, amounts withheld, and related data. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older W4s Certificates documenting the exemption status of individual city employees, also known as W-4 forms. Information includes: employee name and address, social security number, designation of exemption status, and signature. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older PERSI Records Records relating to PERSI, including Employer Remittance Forms, invoices, correspondence, financial adjustments, etc. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Unemployment Reports Records documenting employee earnings on a quarterly basis. Used to document costs and charges in the event of an unemployment compensation claim. Information includes: employee name and social Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 297 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 12 OF 36 security number, quarterly earnings. Contracts Agreements with vendors and other parties either in hard copies or contained on the Contract Management Database for the acquisition or sale of equipment, supplies, services or property, also includes insurance certificates, payment and performance bonds pertaining to a solicitation or contract that Purchasing is facilitating. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older (provided 5 years from date of substantial completion) Lease Agreements Lease agreements for property or equipment. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Purchase Orders Requests and purchase orders for goods or services purchased by the city. Information includes: department, delivery location, date, quantity, description, unit and total price, and authorizing s ignatures. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Purchasing Selection Records documenting competitive bidding and purchase of goods, services, and public works construction, and procurement of design professionals. Records include: published notices and solicitations, specifications, bids, requests for qualifications, statements of qualifications, etc. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Adjustment Registers Records documenting adjustments to customer water, sewer, garbage or other city- provided service billings for debits, credits, refunds, returned checks, and related reasons. Information usually includes: customer’s name and address, type of adjustment, justification, amount changed, authorizing signatures and other Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 298 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 13 OF 36 information. (Records held within the billing software). Billing Directive Application completed by owner or property manager to initiate Third Party billing for specified utility account. Information included: owner, property manager, tenant, move-in date, and service address. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Billing/Payment Registers Records documenting transactions on the water, sewer, garbage or other city-provided service account of each customer. Useful for reference to assure accurate customer billings and posting of payments. Information often includes: customer’s name, service address, meter reading, water usage, utility charges, payments, adjustments and related data. (records held within the billing software). Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Change Record Records documenting routine information changes to customer accounts, including name and address. (Records held within the billing software). Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Customer File General correspondence and forms related to a specific utility account. This information would be in addition to that found within the billing software. Documents in file may include and are not limited to: general letters, payment arrangement forms, third party billing docs, hard copies of customer history reports, leak adjustment requests, letters submitted to the City for customers. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 299 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 14 OF 36 Disconnect Notice to City Council Notice to City Council to verify that no customer currently slated for shut off due to non-payment has requested a hearing with the Board of Adjustment. Notice includes number of customers slated for shut off and the value of the delinquent accounts. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Disconnect Record Records documenting a customer’s request for disconnection of water, sewer, garbage or other city-provided services. (records held within the billing software). Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Meter Readings Document the readings of customer water meters for billing purposes. Information typically includes: meter reading, date read, account number, billing code, final reading, reason for turnoff, meter changes, and related data. (records held within the billing software) Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Renter Addendums Supplemental document completed by the tenant to accept the third party billing for specified utility account. Information included: tenants name, service address, mailing ad dress and phone number. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Security Deposit Records Records documenting customer payment of a security deposit to receive temporary dumpster services. Information usually includes date, amount of deposit, customer’s name, address, and account number, date account closed, refund date, amount of deposit applied, and related information. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Shut Off Turn On Electronic spreadsheet used during shut off day by water department field staff and Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 300 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 15 OF 36 MUBS. Tracks customers that are to be shut off, payments, and turn-ons as authorized. Record includes: Customer name, service address, meter id, time of shut off, time of payment, time of turn-on, fee waived if applicable and general notes. Fire Department Car Seat Inspections Car seat inspection forms. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Correspondence General administrative correspondence, including records created or received in the course of administering city policies/programs, but not related to significant policy/program discussions or decisions. Includes customer survey cards. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Meeting Minutes Final, approved Officer and Command Staff meeting minutes. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Public Education Programs & Publications Records related to the design and implementation of educational and other outreach programs provided to the public by the department. May include: class descriptions, instructional materials, course outlines, class enrollment and attendance records, reports, speeches, and publications. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Structure Burn Training Records Records related to structure burns. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Human Resources Affirmative Action; Equal Employment Records documenting city compliance with the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Equal Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 301 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 16 OF 36 Opportunity Commission Reports Employment Opportunity Act of 1972 and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Records include: plans, policy statements, reports, investigations, case files and related information. Also includes EEO-4 reports submitted to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) documenting compliance with EEOC requirements by cities with 15 or more employees. Budget Prep Records Working documents utilized to build base budgets and establish yearly budgets; worksheets, enhancements, amendments, etc. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Correspondence, Administrative Correspondence created or received in the course of administering City policies and programs. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Committee Records Agendas and meeting minutes/notes for special groups convened by HR for specific purposes such as Benefits, Compensation, and Wellness. Destroy records dated December 31, 2011 and older Insurance Policies/Plans: Employee Group Health and Life Benefits Records documenting plan descriptions and summaries of city insurance policies and plans covering employee group health and life benefits, including annual certification records. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Surveys HR and other initiated internal surveys, survey results (e.g. Salary Surveys, Employee Satisfactions Surveys, Best Place to Work. Etc.). Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Information Technology Correspondence Records created or received in the course of administering city policies, procedures or programs, but these records do Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 302 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 17 OF 36 not provide insight into significant policy, procedure or program discussions or decisions. Case Management Notes All cases opened in Case Management. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Department Policies and Reports Policies, reports, and documents regarding internal department operations and procedures, e.g. computer usage policy, password policy, service level goals, training materials, evaluations of materials. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Outlook E-mail Messages – General City Staff All e-mail messages, sent or received by City staff using Outlook software, that are stored in Outlook or the City’s e-mail archiving system. (E-mail messages may be preserved elsewhere in digital or paper format for longer periods of time as the subject matter of such messages may require). Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Mayor’s Office Correspondence Correspondence created or received in the course of administering city policies/programs, but these records do not provide insight into significant policy/program discussions or decisions. May include citizen response letters, letters to homeowner associations and businesses. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Agendas & Minutes Agendas and minutes of Director Meetings, Operational Meetings, Mayor’s Youth Advisory Council Meetings. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Applications Forms and materials submitted with application for positions or awards administered by Mayor’s Office, including applications for scholarships, Promise partners, Mayor’s Youth Advisory Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 303 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 18 OF 36 Council, volunteer positions, City commissions, and City committees or task forces. Proclamations Proclamations issued by the Mayor. Destroy records dated December 31, 1993 and older Publications Informational or promotional publications of the Mayor’s office, including newsletters, flyers, marketing materials, brochures, program materials. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Parks and Recreation Department Agendas & Minutes Agendas and minutes of weekly and monthly MPR staff meetings. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Budget Preparation Records Working documents utilized to build base budgets and establish yearly budgets, including but not limited to enhancements, amendments, carry forward support, FTE anticipation, vehicle replacement, and quotes for service/maintenance. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Internal Department Time Logs and Reports Completed logs of employees’ time, tasks, and location; reports and analysis of related data. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Police Department Activity Reports Daily, weekly, monthly or other reports documenting the activities of employees, including: type of activity, employees involved, time spent on activity, work completed, equipment used, etc. May include Education & Prevention Training reports. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Asset Forfeiture Records Documentation pertaining to the seizure process and obtaining approval through the courts. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Code Enforcement Records** Records created by code enforcement officers to Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 304 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 19 OF 36 document a violation or investigation into a suspected violation of city ordinance that does not become a crime report (DR). Crime Analysis Statistics Records documenting police efforts to anticipate, prevent, or monitor criminal activity. May include statistical summaries of crime patterns, modes of operation, analysis of particular crimes, criminal profiles, forecasts, movements of known offenders, etc. Destroy records dated December 31, 2015 and older Crime Reports (DRs) for Suicides, Unattended Deaths, and Major Crimes (murder, involuntary manslaughter, rape, sexual abuse of a child, terrorism) Reports documenting a suicide, unattended death and/or criminal offense and actions taken, including charges or arrests. Record typically includes location of occurrence, date and time, handling officer, involved parties (suspects, victims, witnesses, reporting parties, etc.) and their personal information, summary of events and supportive documents (e.g., probable cause statements, witness statements, runaway forms, release of custody forms (juveniles), criminal background information (ILETS/Triple III, Ada LE Lookup, ISTARS, JDOC), documents provided by citizens and victims, citations, property invoices, release of property forms, etc.). May include polygraph records (e.g., pre-examination records, questions, statements of consent, analysis reports, results charts, conclusions, interviewee statements, related information); property and evidence control and disposition records (e.g., evidence photographs, receipt Destroy records dated December 31, 1918 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 305 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 20 OF 36 forms, evidence logs, property reports, destruction lists, property consignment sheets, seized firearm logs, homicide evidence inventories, etc.); and/or informant case files (reports, correspondence, payment records, fingerprint cards, signature cards, letters of understanding on informants’ activities and related records). Crime Reports (DRs) and Citations for other Crimes Reports documenting a criminal offense and actions taken, including charges or arrests. Record typically includes location of occurrence, date and time, handling officer, involved parties (suspects, victims, witnesses, reporting parties, etc.) and their personal information, summary of events and supportive documents (e.g., probable cause statements, witness statements, tow slips, administrative license suspension forms, intoxilyzer slips, field sobriety tests forms, runaway forms, release of custody forms (juveniles), criminal background information (ILETS/Triple III, Ada LE Lookup, ISTARS, JDOC), documents provided by citizens and victims, citations, property invoices, release of property forms, Leads Online printouts, shoplifting reports from store security officers, etc.). May include polygraph records (pre- examination records, questions, statements of consent, analysis reports, results charts, conclusions, interviewee statements, related information), Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 306 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 21 OF 36 abandoned vehicle reports, found property records, traffic collision reports, property and evidence control and disposition records (e.g., evidence photographs, receipt forms, evidence logs, property reports, destruction lists, property consignment sheets, seized firearm logs, homicide evidence inventories, etc.), and/or informant case files (reports, correspondence, payment records, fingerprint cards, signature cards, letters of understanding on informants’ activities and related records). Digital Media – Type 2 Digital media attached to a crime report for a felony other than a major crime. Includes video, audio, or other digital content created by a law enforcement officer in the course of an investigation or response and attached to a crime report for a crime other than murder, involuntary manslaughter, rape, sexual abuse of a child, or terrorism. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Digital Media –Type 5 Digital media related to an officer complaint. Includes video, audio, or other digital content created by a law enforcement officer in the course of an investigation or response relevant to a complaint about such response or officer. Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older Field Interview Reports (FI cards) An informational document written by police officers relating to individuals, events, or vehicles for which the officer does not have probable cause for enforcement. Typically includes name and current address of person contacted, physical description of p erson or vehicle, Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 307 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 22 OF 36 officer’s name, location of contact, date and time, reason for contact, etc. Grant Records Applications and required reporting documents for grants to support law enforcement initiatives and programming (e.g., crime prevention, substance abuse programs, criminal justice, SWAT). Destroy records dated December 31, 2003 and older Health & Welfare Referrals/ APS & Daycare Complaints Referrals of suspected child abuse, adult abuse and daycare complaints. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Internal Affairs Files Records documenting department’s investigation of an officer’s role in an incident for the purpose of evaluating compliance with department policy and professional standards. Records typically include investigative materials (video and audio recordings, written statements, narratives, analysis), polygraph records (pre-examination records, questions, statements of consent, analysis reports, results charts, conclusions, interviewee statements, related information), and recommended disciplinary actions, if any. Destroy records dated December 31, 1943 and older Intoxilyzer 5000en, Draeger 9510 and LifeLoc Instrument Records Factory and State of Idaho certificates for instrument; log of each person that takes the breathalyzer test and verification testing. May include suspect name, date, time, results, operator name, calibration check results, simulated temperature in range, comments, etc. Destroy records dated December 31, 2015 and older Master Name Index Records Information on individuals who are field interviewed, individuals who are arrested, suspects or accomplices in crimes, victims, Destroy records dated December 31, 1918 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 308 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 23 OF 36 complainants, and witnesses to incidents. Information typically includes name, address, date of birth, race, sex, date and time of incident or contact, case number Radar Equipment, Certifications, and Maintenance Records Records documenting the calibration and maintenance of radar equipment that may be useful in documenting the accuracy of the readings. Often includes original factory certification of calibration. Information relating to maintenance and repair may include a description of the work completed, parts used, date of service, equipment number, make, model, etc. Destroy records dated December 31, 2015 and older Training Materials Records related to training programs provided to MPD personnel by presenters including City employees, contractors, or other presenters. May include course descriptions, instructor certifications, instructional materials, course outlines and handouts, and attendance records. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Victim Witness System Notations and documents documenting contact with vict ims and witnesses. Destroy records dated December 31, 1998 and older Written Warnings Written notice provided by MPD officer to member of the public to bring attention to a potential or actual violation. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Public Works Department Ada County Highway District (ACHD) Permits Permits issued by Ada County Highway District (ACHD) to dig in public utility easement. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Alarm Monitoring / Test Results Reports Reports of monitoring fire alarms, security alarms and sprinkler tests for all relevant City-owned facilities including annual fire alarm testing, annual Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 309 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 24 OF 36 backflow testing, quarterly sprinkler testing in Sapphire suppression system, monthly fire pump runs, and monthly check on fire extinguishers and Sapphire. Area of Impact Records Records related to analysis of expansion of Public Works services into the Area of Impact such as those for Kuna, Kuna Treatment Plant, Meridian Heights Water and Sewer District, South Meridian Planning. Destroy records dated December 31, 1993 and older Budget Preparation Records Work documents utilized to build base budgets and establish yearly budgets, including vehicle replacement worksheets, enhancements, amendments and carry forward support. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Committee Records Agendas and meeting minutes for special groups convened by Public Works such as City Services Focus Group, Construction Best Management Practices Sub-Committee, Energy. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Confined Space Entry Permit A written authorization prepared prior to employee entry into a Permit Required Confined Space. The Department’s permit contains specific entry space, purpose and time conditions under which the entrance will operate. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Construction Punch Lists New projects inspection report on City and Development projects noting repairs that need made. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Construction Samples Bacteria sample results taken for water line/well construction. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Correspondence, Administrative Correspondence created or received in the course of Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 310 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 25 OF 36 administering City policies, procedures, or programs. Departmental Reports Department reports, performance management presentations. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Emergency Master Plans Emergency plan records for City Hall, Emergency Management, and Continuity of Operations. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Engineering Capital and Enhancement Plan (ECEP) Reports Engineering Capital & Enhancement Plan (ECEP) – 5 year Capital Improvement Plan Reports. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Environmental Awards Records Awards presented to citizens and businesses in recognition of environmental contributions to the community. This includes but is not limited to award nominations, certificates, photographs, and lists of recipients. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Events, Public Works Records related to planning Public Works internal and external events. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Fire Flow Reports Actual fire flow data taken from a particular fire hydrant. Destroy records dated December 31, 1943 and older Fire Flow Requests Requests from customers for fire flow and responses from Engineering staff based on computer modeling. Destroy records dated December 31, 1943 and older Leak Letters Letters that were mailed to customer informing customer of a possible leak are attached to the service order for leak check. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Meeting Minutes Internal meeting agendas, minutes, sign-in sheets Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Meter Warranty Report A report on meter warranty. Destroy records dated December 31, 1993 and older Photos, Building Maintenance Photos relating to repair and replacement of City-owned equipment, material, and facilities. Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older OR December 31, 2008 Presentations Departmental presentations. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 311 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 26 OF 36 Pretreatment Awards Records Awards presented to businesses in recognition of Best Management Practices (BMP) contributions to the Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility. This includes but is not limited to award nominations, certificates, photographs, and lists of recipients. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Radio Licensing Licensing spreadsheets for SCADA radios, base station and vehicle two/way radios. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Rate / Fee Records Records related to establishing utility rates and fees, including calculations, research and recommendations. Destroy records dated December 31, 1998 and older Safety / Health and Testing Safety and health documents including but not limited to training, auditory testing records, respirator fit test information. Destroy records dated December 31, 1943 and older Safety Inspections Inspections / Reports for Gas Monitors, Crane, Fall Protection, and Fire Inspection. Destroy records dated December 31, 1988 and older Safety Meeting Agenda / Signup Sheets Topics covered and sign-up sheet for employees who attended the meetings. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Service Orders Records including requests from customer, Utility Billing, or Water Division to perform work or get a read at an address as well as historical logs showing service order number. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Sewer Maintenance and Repair Records Records documenting the maintenance and repair of City sewers. May include summaries, reports, and similar records usually compiled from daily work records on a monthly or quarterly basis. Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older OR December 31, 2013 Sewer Modeling Requests Requests from customers to run sewer model for capacity and sizing and response from Engineering staff based on computer modeling. Destroy records dated December 31, 1943 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 312 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 27 OF 36 Sewer Smoke Test Records Records documenting smoke tests undertaken to verify hookup to main sewer lines, check condition of pipes, or determine effectiveness of backflow prevention devices. Information typically includes: maps or diagrams of lines tested, location of leaks detected, inspector’s name, pipe size, and related information. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Sewer Television/ Videoscan Inspection Records Reports documenting television inspections used to locate problems and defects in sewer lines. Often consists of periodic inspections of existing lines, final inspections of newly constructed lines, and inspections at the end of warranty periods. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Special Projects Documents related to special or one-time projects to include, but not limited to: Strategic Plans, Inventory Management, Project Information, Rail with Trail, Subdivisions, and Accreditation. Destroy records dated December 31, 2008 and older Spring flush notices (Mailers) Flush notices mailed to customers for spring flush of water system / Maps. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Surveys Public Works initiated internal and external surveys and survey results. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Training Records documenting attendance and presentation by City employees at conventions, conferences, seminars, workshops, and similar training events. Includes training requests, training and Continuing Education Unit (CEU) tracking reports, and related correspondence. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 313 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 28 OF 36 Turbidity Reports Logs used for entering wasted water flushed from the water system and not sold. Flush locations are listed. Water Quality information, including Nephelometer Turbidity (NTU) readings, are documented. Destroy records dated December 31, 1993 and older Valve Maintenance Records Records documenting the location, specifications, maintenance, and repair of valves in the City sewer system. Includes lists, charts, drawings, reports, logs, and related records, valve location, identification number, run of pipe, size, make, year installed, depth, turns to open and normal position, narratives of valve maintenance and repair, test run, personnel completing work, dates, and related information. Destroy records dated December 31, 2017 and older OR December 31, 2013 Water Meter Reports Water meter reports including: NC list, billing status report, autoread master route report, billing pre-scan report, re-reads, and water meter testing results. Destroy records dated December 31, 2013 and older Water Quality Correspondence Any mailed correspondence with labs, customers, regulators concerning sampling. Destroy records dated December 31, 2003 and older Water Quality Master Log Records documenting water quality calls from customers. Destroy records dated December 31, 1993 and older Temporary Records Record Description Years City Clerk’s Office Election – General/Regular (Working Files) Election ballots, including voted ballots, unused ballots, spoiled ballots, ballot stubs, absentee voting, and duplicate poll books Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older Public Records Requests Written public records requests, city denials of public records requests, responses, etc. Destroy records dated December 31, 2017 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 314 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 29 OF 36 Community Development Department Committee/Ad-Hoc Team Records Agendas and meeting minutes/notes for special groups convened by Community Development for specific purposes such as understanding operational gaps, Code issues, and process delays. Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older Department Guidelines, Policies, Procedures, Processes and Reports Departmental records created or received in the course of administering departmental policies, procedures, or programs, but these records do not provide insight into significant policy, procedure, program, discussions, or decisions. Including, but not limited to: citizen response letters. Destroy Records dated December 31, 2016 and older Finance Special Projects/Initiatives Documents related to special or non-confidential one-time projects Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older Fire Department Public Record Requests Public records requests and responses. Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older Ride-Along Forms Signed waivers for persons requesting a ride-along with the department. Ride Along tracking records. Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older Narcotics Inventory & Usage Narcotic inventory and usage- hard copy, narcotics distributed to the engine companies. Destroy records dated December 31, 2015 and older Human Resources Employment Verification (I-9) of Job Applicants Document to the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service that an applicant or employee is eligible to work in Destroy termed employees records dated December 31, 2017 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 315 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 30 OF 36 the U.S. Information includes: employee information and verification data such as citizenship or alien status and signature, employer review and verification data such as documents, which establish identity and eligibility, and employer’s signature certifying that documents were checked. This category includes forms completed for all new hires, as superseded or previous forms completed on rehires. Recruitment and Selection Records for Applicants who are Hired Documents regarding the recruitment and selection of city employees and contracted service providers such as attorneys, auditors, consultants, etc. Records may include, but are not limited to: job announcements and descriptions, applicant lists, applications and resumes, position advertisement records, civil service and other examination records, interview questions, interview and application scoring notes, applicant background investigation information, polygraph test results, letters of reference, civil service records, staffing requisition forms, certification of eligibles, recruitment file (job announcement, position description, documentation relating to the announcement and test, and test items and rating levels), and related correspondence and documentation. Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older Recruitment and Selection Records for Documents regarding the recruitment and selection of city employees and contracted Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 316 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 31 OF 36 Applicants who are Not Hired service providers such as attorneys, auditors, consultants, etc. Records may include, but are not limited to: job announcements and descriptions, applicant lists, applications and resumes, position advertisement records, civil service and other examination records, interview questions, interview and application scoring notes, applicant background investigation information, polygraph test results, letters of reference, civil service records, staffing requisition forms, certification of eligibles, recruitment file (job announcement, position description, documentation relating to the announcement and test, and test items and rating levels), and related correspondence and documentation. Collective Bargaining Records documenting negotiations between the city and employee representatives, including contracts, reports, negotiation notes, letters of agreement, arbitration findings, cost analyses, minutes, tape recordings, etc. Destroy records dated December 31, 2015 and older Kinds and Levels Chart Records documenting the description, classification and compensation of city jobs and positions. Usually includes details of duties and responsibilities of each position time percentage breakdowns of tasks, skills and abilities needed for each position, and related records documenting the development, modification or Destroy records dated December 31, 2015 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 317 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 32 OF 36 redefinition of each job or position. Leave Applications Applications or requests submitted by city employees for compensatory, family and medical leave, long term leave and other leave time. Information usually includes: employee name, department, date, leave dates requested, type of leave requested, and related data. These are not kept by Finance. Destroy records dated December 31, 2015 and older Position Descriptions Records documenting the description, classification and compensation of city jobs and positions. Usually includes details of duties and responsibilities of each position time percentage breakdowns of tasks, skills and abilities needed for each position, and related records documenting the development, modification or redefinition of each job or position. Destroy records dated December 31, 2015 and older Payroll Unemployment Claims Records documenting claims submitted by former city employees for unemployment compensation. Usually includes: claims, notices, reports, and related records. May also include records generated by the appeal of claim determinations. These are received by HR and kept in HR. Destroy records dated December 31, 2015 and older Information Technology IT Updates to Directors Updated project lists and associated priorities provided to Directors at Director meetings. Destroy records dates December 31, 2016 and older Mayor’s Office Videos Videos prepared weekly for informational or promotional Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 318 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 33 OF 36 purposes, e.g. , City Council meetings, This Week in Meridian. Parks and Recreation Facility Permits Permits and materials including, but not limited to: completed Park Alcohol and Amplified Sound Permits related to individual’s or organization’s park picnic shelter reservation. Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older Short-term concessions permits and related materials from vendors. Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older Facility Reservation Application and Materials Collected Certificates of Liability Insurance from individuals or vendors. Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older Financial Aid Applications Completed application forms and materials submitted to request financial assistance for children’s class or program (e.g., Care Enough to Share). Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older Indemnity Forms, Medical Release Forms, Waivers Signed waiver/indemnity agreement related to individual’s or organization’s participation in department-sponsored or department-provided class, camp, program, reservation, activity, transportation, or travel. Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older Recreation Activity Sign In/Sign Out Sheets Log sheets completed by parents to signify that minor has been dropped off or picked up from a department-sponsored or department-provided class, camp, program, or activity. Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older Log sheets completed by participant confirming they have attended a class or activity. Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older Sports Schedules and Scores Record of games played and final scores. Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older Special Event Forms Completed forms from citizens and businesses participating in a special event, including but not Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 319 of 576 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIST OF CITY -WIDE RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION PAGE 34 OF 36 limited to vendor and sponsor contracts and entries. Team Rosters Record of all individuals registered for a sports team. Destroy records dated December 31, 2016 and older Police Department Crime Analysis Statistics Records documenting police efforts to anticipate, prevent, or monitor criminal activity. May include statistical summaries of crime patterns, modes of operation, analysis of particular crimes, criminal profiles, forecasts, movements of known offenders, etc. December 31, 2015 and older Digital Media – Type 5* Digital media related to an officer complaint. Includes video, audio, or other digital content created by a law enforcement officer in the course of an investigation or response relevant to a complaint about such response or officer. December 31, 2016 and older Intoxilyzer 5000en, Draeger 9510 and LifeLoc Instrument Records Factory and State of Idaho certificates for instrument; log of each person that takes the breathalyzer test and verification testing. May include suspect name, date, time, results, operator name, calibration check results, simulated temperature in range, comments, etc. December 31, 2015 and older Radar Equipment, Certifications, and Maintenance Records Records documenting the calibration and maintenance of radar equipment that may be useful in documenting the accuracy of the readings. Often includes original factory certification of calibration. Information relating to maintenance and repair may include a description of the work completed, parts used, December 31, 2015 and older Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 320 of 576 EIDIAN?- CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 S Project File Name/Number: Item Title: Resolution 19-2142 Meeting Notes: A Resolution Revising the Public Works Design Standards for the City of Meridian I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.S . Presenter: Chris J ohnson Estimated Time for P resentation: 1 minute Title of I tem - Resolution No. 19-2142: A Resolution Revising T he P ublic Works Design Standards F or T he City O f M eridian. A R esolution Revising T he P ublic Works Design S tandards C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate Reso Revising P W D esign Standards R esolution 5/15/2019 P W D esign Standards E xhibit 5/15/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate L egal.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/15/2019 - 6:08 P M L egal.A lbertson, Michelle Approved 5/15/2019 - 6:28 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 323 of 576 CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 19-2142 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, MILAM, PALMER, LITTLE ROBERTS A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN REVISING THE PUBLIC WORKS DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council have authority to provide the development community in the City of Meridian with information, process and standards for design of City infrastructure for both public and private development within the city limits; and WHEREAS, on May 24, 2016 the Public Works Design Standards were presented to the Mayor and City Council and adopted with Resolution No. 16-1144. WHEREAS, on May 14, 2019 revisions to the Public Works Design Standards were presented to the Mayor and City Council. WHEREAS, the purpose of the Public Works Design Standards is to provide guidance in order to maintain standards and best practices in accordance with the City of Meridian's ordinances, policies, practices, specifications and standards. WHEREAS, the City Council may adopt policies and standards and incorporate changes as needed; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That the Public Works Design Standards be revised, a copy of which is attached to this Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference. ATTE' Section 2. That the revised Public Works Design Standards shall be effective June 1, 2019. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 21St day of May, 2019. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 21St day of May, 2019. DESIGN STANDARDS ENGINEERING DIVISION 33 EAST BROADWAY AVENUE, SUITE 200 MERIDIAN, ID 83642 March 2019 - Revised Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 325 of 576 March 2019 – Revised - Table of Contents - Section 1 Definitions ……………………………………….. 1 Section 2 General Design Requirements ……………………. 3 Section 3 General Plan Requirements ………………………. 8 Section 4 Domestic Water Supply System ………………….. 12 Section 5 Sanitary Sewer System …………………………… 20 Section 6 Street Lighting ……………………………………. 32 Section 7 Grading and Drainage ……………………………. 43 Section 8 Pressure and Gravity Irrigation …………………… 46 Section 9 Class A Recycled Water System …………………. 49 Section 10 Streetscapes ………………………………………. 54 Section 11 Landscaping ………………………………………. 59 Section 12 Waterways and Floodplains ……………………… 60 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 326 of 576 March 2019 – Revised OVERVIEW PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to provide the development community in the City of Meridian with information, process and standards for design of City infrastructure for both public and private development within the city limits. Design guidance is provided in order to maintain standards and best practices in accordance with the City of Meridian’s ordinances, policies, practices, specifications and standards. SCOPE This document provides minimum design standards and guidelines for development-related infrastructure. Standards are required provisions, and are identified with language such as “shall”, “must”, and “required” or “prohibited”. Guidelines are voluntary provisions identified with language such as “should”, “recommended”, or “encouraged”. These standards and guidelines are intended to supplement other applicable regulatory agency standards. These design standards and guidelines address the following elements for new development: • General Requirements applicable to all projects (Sections 1 through 3) • Utilities • Domestic Water Supply S ystem (Section 4) • Sanitary Sewer S ystem (Section 5) • Pressure and Gravity Irrigation (Section 8) • Class A Recycled Water System (Section 9) • Site Design • Street Lighting (Section 6) • Grading & Drainage (Section 7) • Streetscapes (Section 10) • Landscaping (Section 11) • Waterways and Floodplains (Section 12) This document is intended to be used in the development of plans and specifications, in conjunction with the Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC), the latest edition of the Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC, and other applicable standards identified in this document for the various elements. Any review by the City of Meridian is for the purpose of ensuring general conformance to standard practices, and does not constitute an engineering review of project plans and calculations or certification of compliance for work installed. The submitting design professional is solely responsible for the design and work installed. -END OF SECTION- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 327 of 576 [1] Section 1 – Definitions March 2019 – Revised SECTION 1 When the following terms or titles are used in these Standards or in an y document or instrument where these Standards govern, the intent and meaning shall be as herein defined below. 1-1 DEFINITIONS: Best Management Practices (BMP’s) – Shall mean schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to waters of the United States. City Engineer – Shall mean the Engineering Manager/City Engineer of the City of Meridian Public Works Department or his/her designee. City Specifications – Shall mean the latest edition of the Cit y of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC). Construction Division – Shall mean the inspection services workgroup of the City of Meridian Public Works Department. Consulting Engineer – Shall mean an y person, firm, partnership or corporation legally authorized to practice engineering in the State of Idaho who prepares land development/improvement plans and specifications for work within the City of Meridian. City of Meridian Standards – City Standards include this document, City Ordinances, the UDC and other documents used to establish standards for the City of Meridian. Design Professional – Any individual that is legally authorized / licensed to conduct work and prepare plans or reports related to their area of expertise. Developer – Shall mean any person, firm, partnership, corporation or combination thereof, principally responsible for a land development/improvement project. Development – Shall mean an y act or process that changes the use or purpose of a parcel such as land grading, utility installation, street or building construction. Development Analyst – Shall mean Development Services personnel responsible for plan review. Development Services – Shall mean the Land Development Section of the Community Development Department of the City of Meridian. Downtown Meridian Redevelopment Area – Shall mean the area bounded by East 3rd Street, East Ada Avenue, North Meridian Road, and East Fairview Avenue. Drinking Water Act – Shall mean the 1974 Environmental Protection Agency Drinking Water Act, (42 U.S.C. 300f-300j-9) plus amendments. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 328 of 576 [2] Section 1 – Definitions March 2019 – Revised Engineering or Engineering Division– Shall mean the Engineering Division of the Cit y of Meridian Public Works Department. MCC – Meridian City Code Project Inspector – Shall mean the Public Works Inspector of the City of Meridian assigned to the project or his/her designee. Recycled Water – Refers to Class A reclaimed / recycled water that is provided by the City of Meridian. Single Point – The secondary irrigation system connection from the City’s domestic water s ystem for shoulder season use (see MCC 9-1-28 Section C-1). State Standards – Shall mean the latest edition of the Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC) and the Idaho State Standards governing water, wastewater and recycled water s ystems. Streetscape – In the city core (see drawing 10-A in section 10), that portion of the right-of- way adjacent to the roadway, between the back of curb and face of building. Waters of the United States – Shall mean any waters defined b y Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 230.3 (s). -END OF SECTION- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 329 of 576 [3] Section 2 – General Design Requirements March 2019 – Revised SECTION 2 GENERAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS 2-1 SECTION SUMMARY: This section contains general guidance and requirements for the steps involved in starting a construction project and continuing all the way through to completion. 2-2 APPLICABLE STANDARDS: The current requirements of the following agencies and/or codes shall apply to general design requirements. Conflicts between these requirements and the agencies and documents listed below shall be resolved on a case-b y-case basis. A. State of Idaho, Department of Environmental Quality (IDEQ) B. State of Idaho, Central District Health Department (CDHD) C. International Building Code D. National Electrical Code E. International Fire Code F. Idaho State Plumbing Code G. Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC) H. City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction (“Supplemental Specifications” or “City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications”) I. Meridian City Code (MCC) - Title 8 “Public Ways and Propert y” 2-3 ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS: All plans and specifications for land development/improvements which are to be owned and operated b y the City shall be prepared, sealed and signed b y the appropriately licensed Design Professional. 2-4 PLAN REQUIREMENTS: All plans for the construction of water, sewer, recycled water, street lights and irrigation infrastructure to be owned b y the City must be submitted to Development Services for review and approval. 2-5 INITIAL DEVELOPMENT/IMPROVEMENT OR UTILITY PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: The initial submittal of development, utility improvement or capital improvement project plans shall consist of the following (if applicable): A. One electronic version in PDF format, and one electronic version in AutoCAD format (as per the City of Meridian – Public Works CADD Specifications for Project Drawings); along with any specifications, computations, test data, and/or other site specific materials requested by Development Services to adequately review the proposed project. B. One (1) copy of the final plat (minus signature sheets) digitally included with each set of plans. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 330 of 576 [4] Section 2 – General Design Requirements March 2019 – Revised C. One (1) copy of each letter from any utility company affected by any water and/or sewer mains outside of the standard corridors. Plans may be submitted without a utility company waiver for out-of-corridor utilities. However, letters from utility companies approving out-of-corridor utilities must be provided prior to plan approval by the City of Meridian. If the applicant is unable to acquire a response from a utility company, they may contact ACHD for approval to construct the utilities out-of-corridor. If ACHD approves, the City must receive a copy of the ACHD approval before City of Meridian’ plans will be approved. 2-6 DEVELOPMENT/IMPROVEMENT OR UTILITY PLAN RE- SUBMITTAL: One (1) PDF shall be returned for review and/or approval. 2-7 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW: All development/improvement or utility plans containing construction of or modifications to water systems, sanitary sewer systems, or recycled water systems require a review for compliance with state regulations. If the Developer wishes to use the City’s Qualified Licensed Professional Engineer (QLPE) review service to conduct the required Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (IDEQ) review, an additional QLPE fee will be due before the plans are released to QLPE for review. The amount of the fee is based on the number of applicable pages reviewed. An y projects with recycled water s ystems, sewer lift stations, water wells, pressure reducing stations, pump stations or force mains may not be reviewed b y the QLPE review service, and must be sent to IDEQ for review. If a developer does not wish to use the QLPE service, the developer is responsible for submitting the plans to IDEQ for review and approval. 2-8 PLAN APPROVAL: Development Project plans will not be approved nor construction authorized until City of Meridian Review and Inspection Fees have been paid in full, and all applicable City of Meridian easements have been submitted and approved. Upon payment of fees, and approval of applicable easements, Development Services will issue the Cit y Engineer’s plan approval letter. One (1) hardcop y set of approved for construction plans, one (1) electronic version in PDF format, and one (1) electronic version in AutoCAD format (as per the City of Meridian – Public Works CADD Specifications for Project Drawings) shall be distributed to Public Works. 2-9 PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING: A pre-construction meeting will be scheduled once all agency approvals have been obtained, and ACHD has approved the roadway portion of the Improvement Plans (if applicable), and traffic impact fees have been paid. These meetings will be scheduled and coordinated through the Public Works Construction Division. 2-10 IMPROVEMENT PLAN REVISIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION: Should changes become necessary during construction, the Consulting Engineer shall first obtain the consent of the Project Inspector and the Development Analyst. The City Engineer may then be consulted by the Development Analyst for compliance with current specifications and to see if the proposed changes can be made in the field and covered with the Record Drawing submittal, or if revised plans are required. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 331 of 576 [5] Section 2 – General Design Requirements March 2019 – Revised If revised plans are required, the revised plan sheet(s) will be forwarded to the Development Anal yst responsible for reviewing and approving the project who will then distribute plans as appropriate. 2-11 RECORD DRAWINGS: The Developer or their authorized representative shall be responsible for keeping an accurate record of all approved deviations from the originall y approved plans, and shall provide copies of these records to the Construction Division for verification upon completion of the work. Final approval of the completed improvements will not be given until as- built/Record Drawings are completed by the appropriate Design Professional (typicall y the Engineer of Record) and accepted by the City of Meridian. Requirements for Record Drawings are outlined in Section 3 of these Design Standards. 2-12 CONFLICTS, ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: The Consulting Engineer is responsible for plans and specifications that meet all federal, state, and municipal laws, rules and standards. The City of Meridian reviews plans for general conformance to these laws, rules and standards. The Consulting Engineer however, is ultimately accountable/responsible for compliance, and City approval does not release them from this responsibility. 2-13 CHANGE IN CONSULTING ENGINEER: If the Developer elects to change the Consulting Engineer during the project they shall provide Development Services, in writing, the name of the individual or firm that is taking over the project. The Developer and his new Consulting Engineer are responsible for construction verification, design change approval, record drawings and all remaining responsibilities of the original Consulting Engineer. 2-14 INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS: Any improvement which will ultimately be owned and maintained b y the City shall be inspected during construction by the City of Meridian Public Works Construction Division. Failure to obtain inspection may result in re-installation of infrastructure. For projects where the City has agreed to provide reimbursement for certain infrastructure, quantities will be measured in the presence of the Project Inspector, and documentation verifying the quantities shall be provided. 2-15 EASEMENTS: Whenever possible, water, sewer and recycled water mainlines shall be located in the public right-of-wa y. However, if it is necessary for a City of Meridian utility mainline to be located outside the public right-of-way, the City shall be given permanent easements meeting the following requirements: A. Easements shall be submitted on the standard easement forms available on the City’s website. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 332 of 576 [6] Section 2 – General Design Requirements March 2019 – Revised B. If it is necessary to install a utility main under a landscaped area, the main shall be centered in a 20-foot wide (minimum) easement free of permanent structures (including any bushes or trees). Shallow rooted plantings and small shallow rooted bushes will be allowed. Information verifying mature root growth of proposed plantings is required. Notes shall be included in the plans and easement stating, “No trees shall be allowed to be planted within a water, sewer or recycled water main easement.” C. Easement widths greater than 20 feet may be required for sewer mainlines depending on the sewer depth, size, and location or if determined necessary by the Public Works Department. D. If it is necessary to install a utility main under a private road, the main shall be centered in an easement that includes the entire road width and is a minimum 20- foot width. E. Temporary construction working easements or access of adequate dimensions shall be provided to allow construction within the permanent easement to be completed in a safe and reasonable manner. F. On development projects, all associated costs of easement acquisition will be at the sole expense of the Developer. These associated costs may be eligible for re- imbursement under the provisions of MCC-8-6-5. G. Existing substandard easements, within the limits of the proposed project, shall be upgraded to current standards prior to plan approval. 2-16 ACCESS ROADS: A. Access to sewer, water and recycled water mains not located within public rights- of-wa y shall be provided by an all-weather gravel access road constructed of ¾” minus road mix gravel. See the Supplemental Specifications. B. The maximum access road grade shall not exceed 10% and shall be shown in the profile view. The access road shall not block natural or artificial drainage and shall conform to the requirements of the governing agencies. C. Access roads for sewer manholes shall have curves designed for turning radii of 28 feet inside radius and 48 feet outside radius and a vertical clearance of 14 feet. D. Rim elevations of manholes located within access roads shall be equal to the elevation of the surface of the access road. E. Hammerhead or intermediate turn-around spaces shall be constructed at the end of all access roads exceeding 150 feet in length and at intermediate locations as determined by Development Services. F. Easements will be required for all maintenance roads and turn-around spaces. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 333 of 576 [7] Section 2 – General Design Requirements March 2019 – Revised 2-17 OPEN WATERWAY CROSSING DESIGN: This section covers the design requirements when a water, sewer or recycled water main must cross an open waterway owned b y a private user lateral association, irrigation district or the United States Government. A. General - The crossing of an open waterway requires user lateral, Public Works, irrigation district and/or United States approval of the design prior to commencing construction. B. A Project Agreement must be in place with the appropriate governing bod y prior to starting construction. C. Design requirements are as follows: 1. Unless otherwise specified by the owner of the waterway, the main must be encased in a steel sleeve. Other criteria shall be per the requirements of the Supplemental Specifications. 2. In all cases, the waterway bed elevation shall be used for design purposes. 3. The top of the steel casing shall have a minimum 3 feet of cover from the lowest point of the waterway bed or as the appropriate governing body requires. 4. Crossing details of pipe, steel sleeve, spacers, annular backfill, piers, anchorage, transition couplings, etc., shall be shown within the plans. 5. Sewer pipeline crossings above waterways shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review on a case-b y-case basis. END OF SECTION- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 334 of 576 [8] Section 3 – General Plan Requirements March 2019 – Revised SECTION 3 GENERAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS 3-1 SECTION SUMMARY: This section contains guidance and requirements for the preparation of construction plan sets. 3-2 APPLICABLE STANDARDS: The requirements listed below shall apply to preparing construction plan sets: A. All applicable standards as listed in Section 2-2 B. Latest edition of the City of Meridian Record Drawing Requirements / Acceptance of Record / Electronic Drawings. C. Conflicts between these requirements shall be resolved on a case-b y-case basis. 3-3 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: A. All development plans for domestic water, recycled water, or sanitary sewer systems shall include a title sheet, layout sheet, plan/profile of each sewer line and standard notes. B. Plans shall be clearly legible, bound / stapled and shall conform to accepted practice with respect to drafting standards. All information, which in the opinion of the City of Meridian Public Works Department, is necessary for the satisfactory design, review, construction, and maintenance of a project, shall be provided and where applicable, shall be shown on the plans. 3-4 APPROVED PLANS: Construction of City of Meridian public facilities, or connections to public facilities, shall not commence within the City of Meridian until plans and/or specifications for such facilities have been approved by the Development Services Division and all plan review and fees have been paid. Plans shall be stamped “Approved for Construction” and signed b y the Development Anal yst prior to beginning construction. The City may order any Contractor to cease work on any project if said Contractor does not have properly approved plans in his possession at the job site. 3-5 PAPER SIZE AND SCALE: All improvement plans shall be submitted utilizing standard plan sheet sizes and common engineering scales. 3-6 DRAFTING STANDARD: All line work, letters and numerals must be clear, sharp and of appropriate weight. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 335 of 576 [9] Section 3 – General Plan Requirements March 2019 – Revised 3-7 TITLE SHEET: All improvements plans shall have the following information as a minimum on the title sheet: A. Name of Project B. Index of sheets C. Vicinity map showing the project or parcel layout with the following information: 1. City limits (if applicable) 2. Adjacent subdivision(s), including names and lot lines 3. Street names C. Name of Developer and contact information D. Name of Consulting Engineering firm and contact information E. Seal, signature and date of the Design Professional registered for the appropriate branch of work covered by the plans. F. US Governmental horizontal (NAD83 adjusted to ADA County H.A.R.N. Survey) and vertical (NAVD 88) benchmark datum and project benchmarks G. Digline number H. QR Code 3-8 SHEET NUMBERING: Each sheet within a set of improvement plans shall be numbered consecutively. Sheet numbering shall conform to generall y accepted drafting standards. 3-9 TITLE BLOCK: Each sheet within the set of drawings shall have an approved title block showing the following: A. Project title B. Sheet title C. Sheet number D. Date E. North Arrow (if applicable) F. Scale Bar G. Consulting Engineer’s name, signature and seal. Signature may be placed across the seal. The title block shall be either across the bottom or along the right edge of each plan sheet. 3-10 SEPARATE LAYOUT SHEETS: On all subdivision plans, a separate plan sheet may be required for each of the following: A. Grading and Drainage B. Street Lights (if more than 1 new street light is required) C. Water D. Recycled Water E. Sewer F. Multi-use Pathways In addition, plan and profile sheets shall show the plan and profile on the same sheet. The plan view should show storm drainage, sanitary sewer lines, multi-use pathways and other utilities. The profile view should show the storm drainage, sanitary sewer lines, and other utility crossings. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 336 of 576 [10] Section 3 – General Plan Requirements March 2019 – Revised 3-11 PLAN DETAILS: In addition to the other requirements of these Design Standards, the following details shall be shown on the plans submitted for approval. A. Record Information - All existing and proposed: 1. Right-of-way lines 2. Boundaries of lots fronting the street 3. Easements (existing and proposed) 4. Both on-site and off-site rights-of-way and easement lines, properly dimensioned 5. Adjacent parcel owner name B. Existing Facilities – All pertinent existing facilities shall be shown, including: 1. Street Striping 2. Medians 3. Driveways 4. Curbs 5. Sidewalks 6. Edge of Pavement (if no curbs are present) 7. Location and size of all underground utilities 8. Limits of 100-year flood plains structures 9. Trees (6” and larger) and other foliage 10. Traffic signals 11. Street lights, service pedestals, junction boxes and underground electrical conduits 12. Drainage ditches and detention basins 13. Utility poles 14. Fire hydrants 15. Retaining walls 16. Any other features of the area which may affect the design requirements for the project When a probable utility conflict exists, the design professional should field verify (b y potholing if necessary) the extent of the conflict. Field verification should take place prior to the completion of final plans or be required of the Contractor prior to construction. C. Contours – Existing contours shall be shown on all plans. The scale shall be such that the plans are both readable and representative of the existing or planned site. See Section 7, “Grading & Drainage” for offsite requirements. D. Profiles – The construction drawings shall show the existing profile of the roadwa y centerline and the proposed design centerline. Gravity pipelines such as irrigation, sewer and storm drainage should be shown in the profile. Crossings of pressurized pipelines such as irrigation, water and recycled water should be shown to identify potential conflicts. Designs of proposed public improvements shall include profiles showing centerline elevations at 50-foot intervals and rates of grades, vertical curves, and other vertical alignment data. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 337 of 576 [11] Section 3 – General Plan Requirements March 2019 – Revised E. Stationing and Orientation – It is preferred that the stationing on plan and profile sheets read from left to right and be based on either roadway centerline or sewer pipe centerline. F. Benchmarks – Location, description, and elevation of benchmarks and datum shall be clearl y delineated on the plans. G. Cross-Sections – Cross-sections shall be included in the plans where determined necessary b y Development Services. Sections shall include all pertinent structural and topographical features. Section call-outs shall be identified by a number and letter and the sheet on which the section appears. H. Special Notes – Special notes shall be clearly indicated, and it shall be conspicuously noted on the plans that all construction work and installations shall conform to the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications and that all work is subject to the approval of Meridian Public Works. 3-12 REQUIRED STANDARD NOTES: A list of all required standard notes may be obtained from the City of Meridian website, and shall be included on all improvements plans submitted to the City for approval. 3-13 STANDARD DRAWINGS: Consulting Engineers do not need to include an y City standard drawings on improvement plans, but shall refer to the Cit y of Meridian Supplemental Specifications by number where appropriate. If a variance to a standard drawing is intended, the drawing number shall be shown with the variance noted or a separate detail shown. 3-14 RECORD DRAWINGS: For information regarding record drawings, reference the latest version of Acceptance of Record / Electronic Drawings on the City of Meridian website. -END OF SECTION- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 338 of 576 [12] Section 4 – Domestic Water Supply March 2019 – Revised SECTION 4 DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 4-1 SECTION SUMMARY: This section contains guidance and requirements for the following: water supply, water main design, and water s ystem appurtenances. 4-2 APPLICABLE STANDARDS: The requirements listed below shall apply to the design of domestic water supply systems. Conflicts between these requirements shall be resolved on a case-by-case basis. A. All applicable standards as listed in Section 2-2 B. IDAPA 58.01.08, “Idaho Rules for Public Drinking Water S ystems” C. Recommended Standards for Water Works (Ten State Standards) D. Meridian City Code (MCC) - Title 9, Chapter 1 “Water Use and Service” and Chapter 3 “Cross-Connection Control” 4-3 WATER SUPPLY REDUNDANCY: New developments should be designed and constructed to provide redundant water suppl y (suppl y from more than one water main) to customers whenever reasonable. The water mains should be arranged to create a looped system and allow flow from multiple directions (minimizing dead-ends). Exceptions shall be approved b y the Cit y Engineer. 4-4 WATER SUPPLY PRESSURE: City of Meridian Engineering staff will model additions or changes to the water supply and distribution system. Normal operating pressures (Average Day Demand) at service connections across the distribution system must be no less than 55 pounds per square inch (psi) and no more than 80 psi unless approved by the City Engineer. 4-5 WATER DEMAND: For the design of water distribution systems serving residential areas, the assumed water demand for design purposes is 0.5 gallons per minute (gpm) per residential unit Maximum Daily Demand (MDD) plus appropriate fire flow. For the design of water distribution systems serving commercial areas, water demand shall be determined on a case-b y-case basis. 4-6 FIRE FLOWS: Required fire flows shall be determined on a case-by-case basis by the most recently adopted revision of the International Fire Code, the Meridian Fire Department, and the Engineering Division. Fire flows shall be modeled b y City of Meridian Engineering staff according to IDAPA requirements. City of Meridian minimum standard for fire flow for an y use is 1500 gpm at 20 psi for two (2) hours. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 339 of 576 [13] Section 4 – Domestic Water Supply March 2019 – Revised 4-7 WATER MAIN DESIGN: Design requirements for water main layout, size and location shall conform to the latest Meridian Water Master Plan Update, and Engineering Division water modeling requirements. A. All water main pipe types are as indicated in the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications. B. Minimum water main size (excluding hydrant laterals) shall be eight (8) inches. Twelve (12) inch water mains shall be installed at section-line roads and approximately halfway between section-line roads. C. Design should limit maximum velocity to 5 ft/sec at MDD and 10 ft/sec during fire flows. D. A water main alignment that is straight between valves is preferred. However, pipe joint deflection not to exceed ½ of the Pipe Manufacturer’s allowable deflection is allowed, but verification of the deflection angle by the contractor is required. E. The water mains shall be shown in the plan view and must identify pipe size, pipe material, location of valves, fire hydrants, existing water lines, air release/vacuum valves, blow-offs, water services, and all other appurtenances public or private including easements. Water mains shall be shown in the profile view where potential conflicts with other utilities exist. F. Install water mains within public rights-of-way and or dedicated City easements. G. Water mains should be located on the north and east sides of streets (see City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications drawing G1). Whenever possible, appurtenances should be located to avoid normal vehicle wheel paths. H. Minimum cover over water lines under section-line and mid-section line roadways that have not been full y developed, or in unpaved areas, shall be five (5) feet from top of pipe to finished grade. In all other areas, minimum cover shall be four (4) feet from top of pipe to finished grade. Water main depths of greater than six (6) feet shall be approved b y the Engineering Division on a case-b y-case basis. Where deeper mains are approved, valve stem risers shall be provided. I. Water mains shall maintain a minimum clearance from all other utilities of at least 12 inches vertical and 4 feet horizontal, except non-potable water pipelines which shall maintain separation recommendations as set forth by the Idaho Rules for Public Drinking Water S ystems. J. Service connections to transmission mains (mains dedicated for moving water from supply to storage, pressure zones, or demand centers) shall not be allowed unless specifically approved b y the City Engineer. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 340 of 576 [14] Section 4 – Domestic Water Supply March 2019 – Revised K. Water mains in unimproved areas shall have a 14-foot wide gravel access road centered over the main per the Cit y of Meridian Supplemental Specifications. L. Dead ends shall be minimized. Water mains should be designed to connect to neighboring properties to complete current or future loops or grids. Cul-de-sacs should be connected b y water mains through easements whenever reasonable. Examples of reasons to connect cul-de-sacs could include: improved flow hydraulics, fire flow or water quality concerns. M. Dead-end water mains shall be terminated with a fire hydrant and appropriate fittings, whenever possible. At locations where hydrants cannot be installed, a 4 inch blow-off shall be installed, per City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications. At temporary dead ends (such as at subdivision phase lines) a 2 inch blow-off assembly shall be installed, per City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications. Blow-offs shall be located in a manner that enables easy access and maintenance including proper easements. Avoid blow-offs in arterial roadways, whenever possible. N. Existing water main stubs installed to serve undeveloped areas that remain unused by new development shall be abandoned at the time of the new development. These stubs shall be abandoned at the active main by removal of the gate valve and installation of a blind flange or plug at the fitting. Gate valves shall not be abandoned in place without prior approval of the City Engineer. Any associated easements that are in place for these stubs shall be properly eliminated per City requirements. O. Water mains that are allowed to remain in the ground after abandonment shall have each end filled with cement grout. The grout plug shall extend 20-feet into the pipe. The size and type of water main to be abandoned shall be noted on the plans with a requirement for the contractor to verify. 4-8 WATER SYSTEM APPURTENANCES: Water system appurtenances discussed herein include valves, fire hydrants, , blow-off assemblies, water service lines, meter setters, meter boxes, meter pits, water meters, pressure reducing stations, wells and well lots. Other appurtenances may include air relief valves, pressure relief valves, detector check valves, sampling stations and backflow prevention devices. A. Fire Hydrants - 1. The Meridian Fire Department shall determine the fire hydrant location requirements for all developments. Maximum spacing is 400 feet as measured along the street frontage in residential developments, 300 feet maximum in commercial developments, or closer if deemed necessary by the Meridian Fire Department. 2. Fire h ydrants shall not be connected to transmission mains unless approved by the Cit y Engineer. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 341 of 576 [15] Section 4 – Domestic Water Supply March 2019 – Revised 3. Fire h ydrants shall not be connected to fire sprinkler service lines. 4. Fire h ydrants shall be placed at street intersections wherever possible and located to minimize the hazard of damage b y traffic. 5. Fire h ydrants located at intersections shall be installed at the Point of Curve or Point of Tangent of the back of curb or edge of pavement alignment. See the City Supplemental Specifications for detailed drawings of typical installations and required clearances. B. Gate Valves and Blow-off Assemblies - 1. Minimum of 2 valves shall be provided at T fittings, and 3 valves at cross fittings for local and collector roadways. 2. A minimum of 3 valves shall be provided at T fittings, and 4 valves at cross fittings for all arterial roadways. Exceptions to this rule may be allowed by the City Engineer when hot tapping active water mains is required. 3. Size-on-size hot taps are not allowed unless approved by the City Engineer. 4. In commercial areas, valve spacing should not exceed 500 feet. 5. In residential areas, valve spacing should not exceed 800 feet (Ten States Standards). 6. In areas without customer connections, valve spacing shall not exceed ¼ mile. 7. Valves and blow-off assemblies that are no longer needed shall be abandoned by removal and installation of a blind flange or plug, as appropriate. C. Water Service Lines and Services - 1. Water services shall be clearl y called out b y standard detail and size on plan sheets. 2. Water service lines from the water distribution main to the property shall be installed at the time the main is constructed within platted and recorded developments whenever possible. 3. Standard size of a residential water service line shall be one (1) inch. Schools, commercial, industrial, or multiple family units with higher water demand shall be provided with larger service lines as determined b y project engineer and subject to approval by Development Services. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 342 of 576 [16] Section 4 – Domestic Water Supply March 2019 – Revised 4. For non-residential sites that include consumptive water uses that do not release water to the sewer s ystem (such as sprinklers, cooling towers, pools, and water features), developer should consider including separate services for such uses to allow for correct sewer billing. 5. Services should be aligned so they are at 90°angles to the water main. If developments are re-platted, existing services may need to be abandoned to meet this requirement. 6. Whenever possible, water services shall not be placed in problematic areas such as high traffic areas, and within 5 feet of building foundations. 7. Whenever possible, avoid running water service lines through underground storm water filtration beds or under drainage swales. See the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC for sleeving requirements for services through storm water facilities. 8. Any unused water services must be abandoned at the water mains by closing the corporation stop, removing the service line, and installing a cap or copper disc on the back of the fitting as approved by the Project Inspector. Commercial services (like water main stubs) shall be abandoned at the water main by removing the gate valve and installing a blind flange. Gate valves shall not be abandoned in place without prior approval of the City Engineer. 9. All fire service lines must be clearl y shown on plans, including size and location of jurisdictional valve. 10. Water service lines shall not be tapped into fire service lines or hydrant laterals (between the auxiliary gate valve and the hydrant). D. Water Meters – Water meters shall be installed on all residential, commercial, industrial, multi-family, public facility, and irrigation water services according to City Code requirements. Meters will be installed by the Water Division of Public Works after building permits are issued and fees are paid, not when water service lines are installed. Installation of water meters b y anyone other than the Meridian Water Division is prohibited. The installation of meter pits and all meter setter appurtenances are the responsibility of the developer’s contractor. 1. Water meters serving single family homes over 3600 sf (not including garage) shall be at least 1 inch. 2. Water meters over 1 inch shall match the size of the service lines from the main to the meter pit. E. Locate Stations – To improve reliability of utility locate services; water main locate stations shall be installed every 500 feet in combination with fire hydrants or by themselves. See City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 343 of 576 [17] Section 4 – Domestic Water Supply March 2019 – Revised F. Pressure Reducing Valve (PRV) Stations – Pressure Reducing Valve Stations may be required for development that occurs at or near planned pressure zone boundaries. Determinations for requiring PRVs will be made b y the Engineering Division through modeling and fire flow demands. If a PRV is required to serve a new development, the City of Meridian will purchase and install the PRV, interior piping, valves and telemetry equipment needed to operate the new PRV. The developer will be responsible for the following: 1. Providing for the location of the PRV vault. Landscaped areas are preferred to street installations. 2. Providing an easement for installations outside of the public right- of-way. 3. Purchasing and installing the concrete vault as required by the City of Meridian per specifications provided by Engineering Division. 4. Providing electrical service to the vault. Coordinate location and electrical requirements with the Engineering Division. 5. Providing conduit run per standard detail to a suitable site for antenna. 6. Stubbing the water mainline to the inside of the vault and installing PVC water pipe between the ductile iron spools where the PRV valves and appurtenances will be installed by the City at a later date. With approval of the City Engineer, the developer may construct the entire PRV vault including valves and appurtenances and seek reimbursement from the City. An agreement outlining the terms and conditions for reimbursement must be entered into prior to construction Note –the PRV plans and specifications will need to be submitted by the City to the Department of Environmental Qualit y for approval. G. Booster Stations- Booster Stations may be required for development that occurs at or near a pressure zone boundary. Booster stations shall meet the requirements found in the Idaho Rules for Public Drinking Water Systems. Required pumping capacity for booster stations shall be determined by the Engineering Division through modeling for the service area and planning period. Permanent booster station pumping facilities will be designed and constructed through capital projects managed b y the Engineering Division. Temporary booster station pumping facilities will be designed and constructed by the developer with review b y the Engineering Division. In both cases, the developer will be responsible for the following: 1. Providing for the suitable location of the booster station site by providing a deed. Minimum lot size shall be 140 feet b y 140 feet. 2. Providing 14-foot wide paved access to the booster station site. 3. Providing three-phase electrical service to the site. Coordinate location and Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 344 of 576 [18] Section 4 – Domestic Water Supply March 2019 – Revised electrical requirements with the Engineering Division. 4. Stubbing the water mainlines and service lines to the site, providing easements as required. 5. If architectural and landscape features other than a chain link fence, minimum landscaping requirements per Cit y of Meridian’s development requirements, and split face block building with metal roof are desired to screen and otherwise blend into the neighboring surroundings, the developer will be required to coordinate with and compensate the Cit y for these additional expenses. Note –the booster station plans and specifications will need to be submitted by the City to the Department of Environmental Quality for approval. H. Wells and Well Lots- Test wells, productions wells, buildings and pumping facilities will be designed and constructed through capital projects managed b y the Engineering Division. The developer will be responsible for the following: 1. Providing for the suitable well site by providing a deed. Minimum lot size shall be 140 feet b y 140 feet. 2. Providing 14-foot wide paved access to the well site. 3. Providing three-phase electrical service to the site. Coordinate location and electrical requirements with the Engineering Division. 4. Stubbing the water main and service line to the site. Provide easements as required. Whenever possible, wells should be located near creeks or drains that allow for flushing. 5. Providing an easement for a flush line, or a flush line and easement if development occurs prior to the City capital project. 6. If architectural and landscape features other than a chain link fence, minimum landscaping requirements per Cit y of Meridian’s development requirements, and split face block building with metal roof are desired to screen and otherwise blend into the neighboring surroundings, the developer will be required to coordinate with and compensate the Cit y for these additional expenses. Note –the well plans and specifications will need to be submitted by the City to the Department of Environmental Qualit y for approval. Additionally, the well development process can take multiple years for permitting, testing, development, design and construction. -END OF SECTION- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 345 of 576 [19] Section 5 – Sanitary Sewer System March 2019 – Revised SECTION 5 SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS 5-1 SECTION SUMMARY: This section contains guidance and requirements for the following: sewer pipeline design, determining when sewer shed studies / design reports are required, general lift station information, force mains, placement of sewer mainlines and manholes, and pretreatment. 5-2 APPLICABLE STANDARDS: The requirements listed below shall apply to the design of sanitary sewer systems. Conflicts between these requirements shall be resolved on a case-by-case basis. A. All applicable standards as listed in Section 2-2 B. IDAPA 58.01.16, “Wastewater Rules” C. IDAPA 58.01.08, “Idaho Rules for Public Drinking Water S ystems” D. Recommended Standards for Wastewater Facilities (Ten State Standards) E. Meridian City Code (MCC) - Title 9, Chapter 4 “Sewer Use and Service” and Chapter 2 “Sewer Pretreatment” 5-3 CAPACITY DESIGN: Sanitary sewer system design must include provisions for the size and capacity to convey all domestic, commercial, institutional, and industrial waste that can be reasonabl y anticipated under conditions of full or ultimate development. Design flow shall be for peak wet weather flow. The determination of average dry weather flows for design purposes shall be based on the best available information concerning land use and density as estimated for land use plans, under the jurisdiction of the Meridian Community Development Department, to form the basis for qualifying present and future wastewater design flows. This information may include approved land use and density in accordance with current zoning in the absence of more specific information pertaining to expected development. A. Capacity – After an application is received by Planning or Development Services, the Engineering Division will run the total flows in the sewer model to evaluate if the proposed design has the capacit y to adequately s erve the entire tributar y area. The City will also include flows for infiltration allowance depending on the location of the proposed development. 5-4 SEWER SHED STUDIES: A sewer shed study is a plan to provide sewer service to a specific portion or sub- service area of the City, and will become part of the organizational knowledge and historical documentation used by the Engineering Division for future planning. When a sewer shed study is required, it shall be submitted and approved prior to submittal of project improvement plans. A. Submittal and Approval - Submittal and approval of a sewer shed study may be required if the Engineering Division determines any of the following conditions exist: Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 346 of 576 [20] Section 5 – Sanitary Sewer System March 2019 – Revised 1. The land use of the development is different than what was assumed in the Sewer Master Plan and Comprehensive Plan 2. Upstream or adjacent areas might require sewer service through the subject propert y 3. Downstream sewer capacity is limited 4. It may not be possible to serve the project and/or surrounding area with gravity sewer service 5. Interim sewer facilities may be required 6. Off-site sewer facilities may be required B. General Study Requirements – In order to develop a sewer shed study, the minimum information that must be accumulated and presented includes: 1. Area to be served b y the local collection and trunk facilities 2. An anal ysis of the regional setting 3. Topography information of the area to be served (delineated on a topo map) 4. Any specific projects that precipitated the study 5. Relevant assumptions and special conditions 6. Proposed sewer infrastructure 7. Ultimate development within the study area 8. Hydraulic grade line at point of discharge into major facilities It is important to note that the same assumptions used in the current Sewer Master Plan (such as values for infiltration rates) should also be used in generating a sewer shed study. C. Study Map - The method of providing sewer service to the entire service area, including pipe sizes, lengths, slopes, and inverts, shall be shown to the extent necessary to determine the requirements within the subject propert y. All areas to be served through the project site, per the latest City Sewer Master Plan, must be included in the project flows. D. Study Slopes – The minimum slopes for gravity pipe shall be determined using the design parameters outlined in the Ten State Standards, but in no case less than 0.1%. Additionally, for those areas where the pipe route is not clearly defined, pipe grades shall allow for an additional 10% pipe length for potential meandering trunk pipeline paths. 5-5 DESIGN REPORTS: For construction of new sewer trunk pipelines (those 10 inches in diameter or larger) and lift station facilities, a Design Report may be required. Design Reports shall meet all requirements of the Engineering Division to include as a minimum, the following information: A. Introduction and Background - Use an exhibit for a project location map and identify whether the proposed facilities will be used on an interim or permanent basis. B. Previous Studies - Sewer Master Plan information, Specific Plans, Community Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 347 of 576 [21] Section 5 – Sanitary Sewer System March 2019 – Revised Plans, and other Sewer Studies that pertain to the project should be referenced and built upon. If appropriate, those documents should be amended if the proposed project will require significant changes to previously approved documents. C. Environmental Document and Geotechnical Report – If these documents are required, findings must be referenced and incorporated to address environmental and geotechnical requirements. Incorporate reference exhibits and photographs as necessary. D. Existing Sanitary Sewer Facilities - Identify and briefl y discuss whether the project is located within the City's service area. Discuss the existing sewer facilities available in the area. Incorporate and reference exhibits as necessary. E. Planned Sewer Improvements - Discuss the proposed interim or permanent facilities. Identify outfalls and discuss any proposed alternatives and available options. Incorporate and reference exhibits as necessary. F. Phasing - Identify phases of proposed development, referencing exhibits that depict the lots proposed to develop at each phase. Discuss the upgrades that are necessary at each phase and include a narrative on what triggers the necessity of implementing the upgrades to encompass the facilities, equipment, costs and timeline for implementation of triggers, design and construction aspects. If a lift station is an interim facility, discuss when and how the facility becomes unnecessary. G. Lift Stations - Provide a narrative of any proposed lift station with respect to the development constraints imposed by an y jurisdictional agency to comply with the City of Meridian Lift Station Specifications and Drawings. Incorporate the requirements for conveyance of deeds and easements. Incorporate and reference exhibits as necessary. 1. Lift Station Site Design - Provide attachments as necessary for the preliminary design of the site. Include specifics on the size, location, and materials for the building, fencing, gates, and equipment on the site. Include the location and size of vaults that will encase air/vacuum valves, check valves, gate valves, etc., and specif y the sizes and materials for these valves. Identify the location and size of the water service. Discuss the need for a hoist or crane. Incorporate and reference exhibits as necessary. 2. Wet Well and Pumping Alternative - Discuss any alternatives considered for wet well and pump design. Include all appropriate information necessary to analyze the size and depth of the wet well as well as alternatives for the type, size, and number of pumps. A narrative on maintenance requirements of the proposed facilities must be included. Discuss any bypass pumping that may be needed during construction. Include flotation calculations if groundwater is present or anticipated. 3. Recommended Force Main Design – Refer to Section 5-5.H. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 348 of 576 [22] Section 5 – Sanitary Sewer System March 2019 – Revised 4. Electrical and Controls - Identify the location of above and underground electrical facilities to serve the site, including the size and location of the transformer. Describe the equipment needed for the site, including lighting, PLC, SCADA, bubbler, pressure transducer and alarm systems, etc. Also, describe the need for emergency power and generator design (if incorporated). Incorporate and reference exhibits as necessary. 5. Evaluation of Odor Control Alternatives - Discuss necessity and alternatives for odor control. 6. Emergency Storage - Provide calculations on the facilities that will be used for emergency storage of sewage in the event of a pump station outage. Identify the location and elevation of the lowest manhole rim in the storage system and an y others in the existing or proposed sewer system that may be adversel y affected. Incorporate and reference exhibits as necessary. Requirements for calculating the emergency storage are presented in the Pump Station section of these standards. H. Force Mains: All pipes utilized for sanitary sewer force mains shall be pressure- rated pipes approved by Meridian Public Works. Force mains shall be designed so that the pipeline is always full, and no point in the vertical alignment is located above the energy grade line. The design report shall address the entire force main s ystem in the most feasible projected layout, starting from the pumps and for the full length of the force main to the outfall back to the gravity s ystem. In the event that plans are submitted that make changes to this layout, an amendment to the design report shall be required to verify that the proposed changes will not affect the pump sizing or efficiency. The force main shall be designed and submitted concurrentl y with the pumps/lift station. 1. Size and Velocity – The force main shall be sized to produce a fluid velocity of no less than 2 feet per second at least once per day, and no more than 8 feet per second. Unless otherwise approved b y the Engineering Division, the minimum force main size shall be four (4) inches in diameter. 2. Hydraulic “C” Factor – For determining the head loss, use the Hazen Williams equation with a C factor of 120. 3. Thrust Forces and Shearing – The design report shall provide recommendation for mitigation of these forces in the onsite structures and the force main. Thrust forces in a force main shall be mitigated through joints that are restrained or anchored to prevent movement and separation. To avoid shearing due to differential settlement, flex couplings shall be installed on pipelines between pump station structures (i.e. wet wells) and vaults, and between valve vaults and b ypass vaults. 4. Water Hammer – Water hammer (surge) shall be addressed in the design report as required b y the City. Water hammer shall be evaluated for the Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 349 of 576 [23] Section 5 – Sanitary Sewer System March 2019 – Revised normal operation of the pump station as well as for power failure while the pump(s) are running. The modulus of elasticity of the pipe material shall be considered when evaluating water hammer effects. The potential impact of water hammer shall be evaluated with special consideration given to cyclical loadings that are inherent in wastewater force mains. A safety factor of 1.5 shall be used when determining the adequacy of all piping s ystem components with regard to withstanding system pressure, and at a minimum, the following shall be addressed in the surge analysis: a) Transient pressures due to water hammer and the effect of these pressures on the entire system b) Cyclic loading of the force main c) Investigation of the pipeline profile to determine the possibility of water column separation d) Shut-off characteristics of all proposed pump control valves, including check valves e) Substantiation for the use of surge control valves and other surge protection devices, when necessary, listing recommended size and computed discharge pressure 5. Location/Separation – Force mains shall be located within the public rights- of-way or in an appropriate easement. A minimum clearance from all other utilities of at least 12 inches vertical and 4 feet horizontal should be maintained, except potable water pipelines which shall maintain minimum separation recommendations as set forth by the Idaho Rules for Public Drinking Water System. A force main alignment that is straight between structures is preferred. However, pipe joint deflection not to exceed ½ of the Pipe Manufacturer’s allowable deflection is allowed, but verification of the deflection angle b y the contractor is required. Where practical, force main alignment shall also be parallel to curbs, street centerlines, property lines, and/or easement lines. 6. Profile –A continuous upward slope from the pump station to the discharge point is desired, even when reasonable over-excavation is required to accommodate the continuous upward slope. In the event that a high point cannot be avoided, and is allowed by Public Works, a combination air release valve shall be installed. 7. Corrosion Protection – All ductile iron pipes shall be protected from corrosion. 8. Combination Air Release Valves – Where high spots in the profile cannot be avoided, combination air release valves (CARVs) shall be installed so that air can be purged from the force main. CARVs shall also be installed as close as possible to the check valves as needed to ensure the protection and maximize the operation of the pumps. CARVs shall be constructed in accordance with Standard Drawing of Meridian’s Supplemental Specifications. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 350 of 576 [24] Section 5 – Sanitary Sewer System March 2019 – Revised 9. Force Main Discharge – The force main shall enter the transition manhole with its center line horizontal and an invert elevation matching the spring line of the gravit y line to ensure a smooth transition of flow to the gravity flow section. New discharge manholes shall be smoothly coated with Sprayroq Sprayshield or Spraywall coating. Existing manholes showing signs of corrosion or if over ten years old shall be smoothly coated with Strong Seal or Sewpercoat cementatious coating. 10. Cost Estimate - Provide an Engineer’s estimate of design, construction, and operating costs if required by the City. 11. Project Schedule – Provide the projected timeline for the project, focused on major start/stop and completion dates. 12. List of Tables – Provide a list of tables used in the design report. At a minimum this should include lift station design criteria and a summary of the projected sewage flows at build-out and the design flows at various stages of development. 13. List of Exhibits - Provide a list of the exhibits used in the design report, at a minimum, this shall include a location map, the overall sewer stud y area, existing and proposed sewer facilities, and the overall sewer layout proposed. This shall also include preliminary drawings for the pump station design such as the site plan, section through the pump station wet well, single line diagram and load calculations. 14. Attachments - At a minimum, the attachments shall include a cost estimate, pump curve with system curve superimposed, calculations for system curve, wet well sizing calculations, emergency storage calculations, cut sheets from manufacturers of proposed facilities and equipment, air/vacuum release valve design sizing and project literature, and a site-specific geotechnical report. 5-6 SANITARY SEWER MAIN DESIGN : All sanitary sewer mainlines shall be placed within public street rights-of-way unless the use of easements is specifically approved through Development Services. Locate manholes to ensure access for routine maintenance. Sewer facilities shall not be placed in an y joint utility trench unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Consideration shall be given for future development when locating manholes in new lines. A. Horizontal Alignment – Pipelines shall be parallel to the street centerline wherever possible. If a change in alignment is necessary, it will require the construction of a manhole. B. Vertical Alignment – A constant slope between manholes is required. If a change in slope is necessary, a manhole is required at that point. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 351 of 576 [25] Section 5 – Sanitary Sewer System March 2019 – Revised C. Location within Roadways – Sewer mains shall be located in a corridor measured from 10 feet south or west to 5 feet north or east of the centerline of an y roadway. D. Location in Constrained Existing Streets – When sanitary sewers are to be installed in an existing street, factors such as curbs, gutters, sidewalks, traffic conditions, traffic lane conditions, pavement conditions, future street improvement plans, and existing utilities shall all be considered. The approval of all appropriate jurisdictional entities and Public Works Engineering Division shall be obtained. E. Relocated Mains – Sewer mains installed to replace existing facilities shall generall y follow existing alignments, but may be realigned as deemed necessary to achieve optimum flow conditions, reasonable access, and separation from existing utility infrastructures. Where possible, existing sewer pipelines in easements and alleys shall be relocated to nearby streets or public rights-of-way. F. Prohibited Locations – Construction of sanitary sewers shall be prohibited in the following locations unless otherwise approved b y the City Engineer: 1. Within the 100-year floodway 2. Within jurisdictional wetlands 3. Parallel and underneath roadway landscaped medians, however crossings are acceptable 4. Within railroad rights-of-way unless a separate easement or license agreement is acquired 5. Within “backyard” and “side-yard” easements 6. Areas inaccessible to equipment or personnel 7. Within 10 feet of any building or structure. If the sewer depth is greater than 10 feet, this distance may have to be greater depending on the soil conditions. G. Separation from Potable and Recycled Water Mains – Separation shall meet the requirements called for in the IDAPA 58.01.16, “Wastewater Rules”. If the IDAPA separation requirements cannot be met, a letter to the City Engineer requesting a waiver of the requirements, along with an explanation for the request, should be submitted. If the waiver is justified the applicant will receive written notification approving the waiver. H. Utility Crossings – Alignment of all sanitary sewer pipelines and structures shall be designed to provide a minimum of 12-inches vertical clearance from all other utilities and/or improvements, unless otherwise approved by Development Services. Approval of crossings less than 12- inches will require special design considerations. I. Drainage Swales – Sanitary sewer pipelines crossing drainage swales shall require a sleeve to be installed allowing access for maintenance and removal of the pipe. The pipe sleeve shall have 1 foot of clearance from the top of the sleeve to the bottom of the swale. J. Abandoning Sewer Mains – Sewer mains that are to be abandoned (taken out of Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 352 of 576 [26] Section 5 – Sanitary Sewer System March 2019 – Revised service) shall be disconnected from the manhole that is to remain in service. A water-tight repair shall be installed in the unused inlet/outlet of the sewer manhole. Grout ends of abandoned pipe with cementitious grout. K. Final Mainline Slope – The last upstream section of any 8 inch mainline; pipe slope shall be a minimum of 0.6%. 5-7 PRIVATE SEWER MAINLINES: Where mainlines are located on private propert y and serve onl y one parcel, they shall be private and will require a plumbing permit. Onsite private mains shall be designed and constructed to the standards required by the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality or the Idaho Division of Building Safet y, whichever is applicable. 5-8 MANHOLES AND CLEANOUTS: Sewer manholes shall be placed at the intersections of all sanitary sewer lines; at all changes in pipe size; at the end of any line terminating in a cul-de-sac; at the end of all permanent lines. A manhole shall be installed at an y temporary line more than 150 feet in length that serves more than four (4) Equivalent Residential Units (ERUs), or terminates at a property boundary where the adjacent propert y has a different ownership. Care should be taken to avoid placement of manholes in wheel paths of travel lanes. A. Drop Manholes – Drop manholes are not allowed without approval of the City Engineer (refer to City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications, Section 502, Part 3). B. Clean-outs – T-Type cleanouts may be used at points where the sewer line is terminated, but shall be continued to subsequent phases of a subdivision or other projects in the future (refer to City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications, Section 503, Part 2.B). 5-9 SEWER SERVICE LINES: Sewer service lines shall conform to Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction and the National Plumbing Code, and shall be designed and constructed per the following guidelines: A. General Requirements - The sewer service lines shall: 1. Extend from the collector sewer to the edge of public rights-of-way or edge of easement. New service lines shall not be located in driveways. 2. Be perpendicular to the sewer main line. 3. Meet minimum separation requirements from domestic and recycled water mains and services set forth in IDAPA 58.01.08, “Idaho Rules for Public Drinking Water S ystems”. B. Care shall be taken to avoid locating sewer service lines within 5 feet of street tree locations. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 353 of 576 [27] Section 5 – Sanitary Sewer System March 2019 – Revised C. Sizing –Sewer service pipe diameter shall be a minimum of 4 inches for residential and 6 inches for commercial. 1. A separate and independent sewer service line shall be provided for every lot, building, and/or structure. 2. No more than three 4-inch sewer service connections into a single pre-cast manhole base will be allowed. D. Material – The sewer service pipe and connecting “T” or “Y” shall be PVC pipe, as identified in the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications. E. Location - When sanitary sewers are constructed as part of new subdivision improvements, a sewer service line shall be constructed to the approximate center of each lot. F. Depth – The Design Professional shall verify the adequacy of the normal service line depth at the edge of easement or right-of-way to serve the intended parcel. G. Slope – The National Standard Plumbing Code requires 4-inch service lines to have a minimum slope of 2% to the propert y line. Where sewer service line will have less than 4 feet of cover, a 1% slope may be used with the approval of the Cit y Engineer. The slopes for sewer service lines 6-inches or larger can be engineered with slopes which achieve a minimum velocity of 2 feet per second with the pipe flowing full or half- full. H. Unused sewer service lines – Unused sewer service lines shall be disconnected at the intersection with the main or manhole. Cut and cap the service at the tee or install a water-tight repair in the unused inlet of the sewer manhole. If capping the service at the mainline is not feasible, contact the City Engineer for alternatives. 5-10 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS IN DEVELOPED AREAS: In cases where developers are extending sewer mainlines through developed areas, these requirements apply: 1. Property owners adjacent to or within 300 feet of the sewer extension project shall be contacted to gauge their interest in obtaining a sewer service. 2. Property owners requesting a service, and willing to pay for the associated cost, shall have a sewer service installed as a part of the sewer mainline extension project. 3. A propert y owner’s request for service shall be honored wherever practicable. 4 Parcels with two or more sources of sewage may have independent sewer services provided to each source. 5 Redevelopment projects with existing sewer lines or services located in easements or alleys, shall relocate mainlines and services to public streets or rights-of-way whenever feasible. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 354 of 576 [28] Section 5 – Sanitary Sewer System March 2019 – Revised 5-11 CORROSION PROTECTION: If required, a Geotechnical Report shall include results of a soil corrosivity test if there are an y proposed metallic structures such as steel casing, ductile iron pipe, steel reinforcement, etc., along the alignment of the pipeline, and recommendations regarding corrosion protection. 5-12 PRETREATMENT REQUIREMENTS: Industrial and commercial wastewater discharges to the sanitary sewer s ystem are regulated through the Industrial Pretreatment Program, which was established by Title 9, Chapter 2 of the Meridian City Code. The Pretreatment Program consists of permitting, inspecting, monitoring, and sampling of all applicable industries and businesses to ensure compliance with applicable local, state and federal requirements. Any industrial or commercial business that discharges or plans to discharge process wastewater to the Cit y of Meridian City sewer s ystem must meet specific discharge standards as determined by the Pretreatment Program. A. Grease Interceptors – Grease interceptors conforming to Standard Drawing 7182015 shall be installed to all grease-bearing wastewater discharge lines leading from sinks, drains and other fixtures or equipment in Food Service Establishments (FSE) that perform cooking operations from establishments including, but not limited to, those listed below: 1. Restaurant, cafe, lunch counter, cafeteria 2. Bar or club 3. Hotel/Motel 4. Hospital, retirement home, sanitarium 5. Factory or school kitchen The City of Meridian, as the local authority, has determined the minimum capacit y size for grease interceptors is 1500 gallons, with double chambers and installed underground. Interceptors shall also meet the following requirements: 1. Interceptor shall be located outside of building in a location accessible to waste hauler service provider. 2. Install interceptor per manufacturer’s specifications. 3. Application of an interior protection coating to decrease grease vault interior material decomposition. 4. All waste shall enter through inlet pipe only. 5. The primary and secondary chamber outlet & inlet pipes shall have tee connections with open pipe tops to allow visual inspections of influent and effluent (wastewater) by City inspectors. 6. Tee pipe length shall be 12-14 inches from the tank bottom, center baffle cross over tee pipe is usually recommended as per grease interceptor manufacturer’s design. 7. Chamber lids shall prevent odors with a built-in handle or notched side to Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 355 of 576 [29] Section 5 – Sanitary Sewer System March 2019 – Revised insert a tool to allow easy access for lid removal. Temporary sealant type material is only allowed in lid holes to 8. eliminate odors, bolts to secure lids are recommended to ensure an air-tight seal. 9. All surface water shall drain away from manholes. 10. Each business establishment for which a grease interceptor is required shall have an interceptor which shall serve only that establishment. Interceptors shall be considered part of the building plumbing, therefore part of the upper sewer service line, subject to maintenance by the Owner. B. Oil/Sand Interceptors – An Oil/Sand Interceptor conforming to Standard Drawing 7182014 shall be installed for an y t ype of business having the potential of producing oil and sand or grit waste, including but not limited to those listed below: 1. Auto Bod y Repair Shop 2. Auto Repair Shop 3. Car Wash 4. Commercial Laundry/Laundromat 5. Outdoor vehicle wash pads (pad shall be designed to not allow storm water from surrounding area to enter s ystem) The City of Meridian as the local authority, has determined the minimum capacit y size for Oil/Sediment interceptors is 1500 gallons, with double chambers and installed underground. Interceptors shall also meet the following requirements: 1. Interceptor shall be located outside of building in a location accessible to waste hauler service provider. 2. Interceptor must be installed per manufacturer’s specifications. 3. All waste shall enter through inlet pipe only. 4. The primary and secondary chamber outlet & inlet pipes shall have tee connections with open pipe tops to allow visual inspections of influent and effluent (wastewater) b y Cit y Inspectors. 5. Tee pipe length shall be a minimum of 12-14 inches from the tank bottom; center baffle cross over tee pipe is usually recommended as per grease interceptor manufacturer’s design. Field adjustment of pipe lengths may be allowed as determined by a City Pretreatment Inspector. 6. Chamber lids shall prevent odors with a built-in handle or notched side to insert a tool to allow easy access for lid removal. Temporary sealant t ype material is only allowed in lid holes to eliminate odors, bolts to secure lids are recommended to ensure an air tight seal. 7. All surface water shall drain away from manholes. 8. Each business establishment for which an Oil/Sand Interceptor is required shall have an interceptor which shall serve only that establishment. Interceptors shall be considered part of the building plumbing, therefore part of the upper sewer service line, subject to maintenance by the Owner. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 356 of 576 [30] Section 5 – Sanitary Sewer System March 2019 – Revised C. Other Requirements by Facility Type - The following are examples of some industrial/commercial facilities regulated b y the Industrial Pretreatment Program per the Pretreatment Standards as identified in Meridian City Code Title 9, Chapter 2 Sewer Pretreatment: 1. Dental Offices - Silver recovery system for x-ray wastewater. 2. Mercury amalgam separator is recommended. 3. Car Washes - No solvent discharges allowed. 4. Dry Cleaning Shops - Still bottom water evaporator for solvent recovery. No discharge of perchloroethylene allowed. 5. Film processing and Photo Development Labs– Silver recovery system. 6. Commercial Laundry/Laundromats – Solvent recapture and high temperature mitigation. 7. Machine Shops – Recapture of metalworking fluids and solvents as no discharges allowed. 8. Radiator Repair Shops – Closed-loop process cleaning system with sealed holding tank. Zero Discharge Permit is required with 9. disposal service identified. D. Approved Exception to the In-Ground Grease Interceptor – In certain cases as determined by the Cit y of Meridian’s Pretreatment Program, a suitable portable unit may be approved on a very limited basis with specific requirements. An Electro- Mechanical Unit or Automatic Grease Interceptor (AGI) may be installed to the facilities’ clean up sink. This unit shall be of the type designed to mechanically remove fats, oils and grease (FOG) automatically. Unit shall have a timer device to activate contained grease discharge in a separate container for proper disposal. Passive grease traps are not allowed in a new or remodeled construction activity. E. At the discretion of the Publicly Owned Treatment Works’ (as defined in MCC 9-2- 1-4) superintendent or designee; enter into a written agreement or permit with the City of Meridian establishing comparable best management practices MCC Title 9, Chapter 2 Sewer Pretreatment 9-2-2- 1 D 2. -END OF SECTION- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 357 of 576 [31] Section 6 – Street Lighting March 2019 – Revised SECTION 6 STREET LIGHTING 6-1 SECTION SUMMARY: This section contains guidance and requirements for street lights and the development of street light plans. Guideline drawings are included at the end of the section. Please refer to the drawings as well as the section standards when designing development street lighting. 6-2 APPLICABLE STANDARDS: The requirements listed below shall apply to the design of street lighting. Conflicts between these requirements shall be resolved on a case-by-case basis. A. All applicable standards as listed in Section 2-2 B. ANSI/IES RP-8-14 Roadway Lighting C. AASHTO Roadway Lighting Design Guide 6-3 STREET LIGHTS REQUIRED: Street lights will be required for all developments within the urban area, along all streets and pathways offered for dedication, including existing streets bordering the development unless exempted by Section 6-4 below. In addition, street lights may be required for lots and parcels containing existing structures which are being improved or altered, depending on the nature and extent of the work. Illustrations of street lights generall y required are shown on Design Standards Drawing 6A. 6-4 STREET LIGHTS NOT REQUIRED: Street lights will not be required under the following circumstances: A. For planned developments, residential, commercial, and industrial developments where internal streets are not offered for dedication, a street lighting system will not be required for the internal non-dedicated streets, but shall be provided b y the developer on external public street frontage. B. In areas where site conditions preclude the installation of street lights adjacent to the development, the owner or developer will be required to deposit monies sufficient to design, install, and inspect street lights under the direction of the Meridian Public Works Department. These lights will be installed when site conditions adjacent to the development become more favorable or in alternate locations in the general vicinity of the development. 6-5 DEVELOPER’S RESPONSIBILITY: A. Existing street lights which must be relocated or repositioned as a result of the construction of new streets or driveways into a development are the responsibility of the developer to relocate. B. Any new s ervices, including those with a step-down transformer, which are required as a result of the modification of an existing utility service pedestal, are the responsibility of the developer. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 358 of 576 [32] Section 6 – Street Lighting March 2019 – Revised C. The developer is responsible to ensure that power remains to the existing street light system until the new street light system to replace it is complete and functioning correctly. D. The developer is responsible for all costs associated with creating a fully functional lighting system. E. The developer, or his legally authorized representative, is responsible for providing as-built record drawings of the street light installation as described in Section 1102 Part 1 of the Supplemental Specifications. 6-6 CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: A. Lack of a functional street lighting system at the time certificates of occupancy are requested shall be grounds for denial of such certificates. B. A finalized electrical permit, issued through the City of Meridian Building Division for street light system work, is required before the City will assume energy costs and authorize Idaho Power to energize the street light system. 6-7 PLAN DETAILS: A. Plans shall show and identify all street lights to be installed, all existing lights in the project vicinity and all applicable provisions and details specified in these standards. B. The street lighting plan should be included in the overall development plan set and shall be a stand-alone plan containing the following information: 1. A vicinity map or equivalent 2. Utility poles and public easements 3. Names of adjacent subdivisions 4. Names of streets 5. Block and lot numbers if available 6. Intersecting propert y lines of adjacent properties 7. A “S ymbols” legend conforming to Design Standards Drawing 6A 8. A North arrow and appropriate scale (1”=10’ to 1”=100’) 9. All existing street lights on both sides of any streets 10. Street Li ghting Standard Notes located on the Cit y’s website Land Development Services section; Standard Notes for Development Projects 6-8 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS: Street lighting shall be designed in conformance with these standards and the current editions of the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Average maintained illuminance or luminance levels, uniformity, and veiling luminance ratios shall be designed to meet the levels specified in the ANSI/IES RP-8-14 or the AASHTO Roadway Lighting Design Guide. Data and calculations verifying compliance of the above requirements shall be submitted for review, or the Design Standards included herein shall apply. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 359 of 576 [33] Section 6 – Street Lighting March 2019 – Revised A. Avoid excessive light trespass into neighboring residences. Utilize IES Type II distribution patterns and/or house-side shields where light trespass could be an issue. B. Coordinate street light locations on design plans to avoid conflicts with tree locations identified in the landscaping plans. 6-9 STREET LIGHT DESIGN DETAILS: Design details for street lights are as follows: A. Intersections – Intersections shall have at least one street light; this includes large commercial driveways. Intersection street light locations and the number required shall conform to Design Standards Drawings 6D, 6E, and 6F. B. Cul-de-sacs – All cul-de-sacs shall have a street light within the ‘bulb,’ as shown in Design Standards Drawing 6E. C. Micro-paths & Multi-use Pathways – Street lights shall be placed at both ends of micro-paths and multiuse pathways. Bollard type lighting ma y be required along the length of the pathway per UDC 11-3A-8. In the case of properties abutting State Highway 55 (Eagle Rd), decorative pathway lighting may be required per UDC 11- 3H-4C3. D. Spacing – Maximum street light spacing shall be measured along roadway centerline and shall conform to Design Standards Drawing 6C. Maximum spacing for downtown historical poles shall be 80 feet. E. Street Light Poles – The position of street light pole bases shall conform to the Supplemental Specifications. Poles located along State Highways, within the clear zone, shall have breakaway bolts. 1. All Type 1 street light poles shall be round steel powder-coated black per the Supplemental Specifications, and conform to Supplemental Specifications Drawing T1 unless otherwise directed b y the Cit y of Meridian Transportation & Utility Coordinator. 2. A davit pole may be approved b y the City Engineer in place of Type 1 poles in instances of overhead utility line conflicts. 3. All Type 2 street light poles shall be square steel with bronze polyester coating and conform to the Supplemental Specifications. 4. Historical poles shall be used in the Downtown Meridian Redevelopment area and shall conform to the Supplemental Specifications. F. Luminaires – Luminaires shall be LED fixtures that are on the approved fixture list (see Design Standards Drawing 6C, note 2), or have been pre- approved in writing b y the City’s Transportation and Utility Coordinator. G. Service – All street light s ystems shall have underground electrical services provided. Service voltage shall be 120 or 240 volts onl y. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 360 of 576 [34] Section 6 – Street Lighting March 2019 – Revised 1. The Cit y Engineer or authorized representative may approve overhead service in unusual areas when justification is given why s ervice cannot be provided underground. H. Metering – All lights on arterial and collector roads (except those fully contained within a subdivision) shall be metered per Idaho Power requirements. The meters shall be contained in a service pedestal conforming to Division 1100, section 1102 of the Supplemental Specifications. Where a metered system is required, new developments shall install conduit with one No. 10 stranded pullwire from the last light on each end of the system to the adjacent propert y line on a stubbed street, where the adjacent propert y has no existing street light s ystem. This will allow for the continuation of the street lights when the adjacent property is developed. I. Installation of Non-Standard Street Lights – 1. Where standard Type 2 lights are required, the City ma y approve the use of non-standard street lights (e.g. decorative street lights not specified in the City Standards) with a written agreement between the City and Developer, releasing the City from maintenance responsibility. The Cit y will accept responsibility for the energy cost of these street lights. A sample agreement can be obtained from the Public Works Department. 2. When the use of non-standard street lights is approved by the City, the developer shall be required to submit design calculations for the pole spacing including photometric calculations and plots showing the design meets the minimum light levels and other criteria of these Design Standards. The Cit y reserves the right to deny use of specific light pole models. 6-10 LAYOUT DESIGN PROCEDURE: The purpose of the layout process is to establish an overall uniform street light system meeting minimum requirements. The design procedure for the street light layout is as follows: A. Identify the nearest control points (intersections, 90 degree bends in streets, large driveways, existing street lights) in each direction of travel from the street light locations being planned. Determine the location of the street lights at the control points in conformance with Section 6-9 above. B. Identify an y existing street lights situated between the intersections. C. Determine the distance between control points on either end of the design area. D. Divide the distance into equal spaces between lights not to exceed the maximum spacing requirements specified in Section 6-9 above. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 361 of 576 [35] Section 6 – Street Lighting March 2019 – Revised E. Compare the light locations to intersecting property lines, driveways, micro- paths/pathways, and other obstructions as follows: 1. If the location falls close to a propert y line and it can be adjusted to the property line within the maximum spacing allowed, then the adjustment should be made. 2. Generall y, street lights should be situated at lot corners for residential lots and parcels with minimal frontage (75 feet or less). The light spacing may have to be unbalanced, with additional lights being added, to attain this and still comply with the maximum spacing allowed. 3. Street light locations shall be adjusted to miss driveways, existing utility poles, trees, and other obstructions by the clearances shown in Supplemental Specifications drawing T8. F. Where street light pole installations cannot be reasonably accommodated due to existing utility-owned poles with overhead electric power lines, the serving utility compan y should be contacted to determine if street lights can be installed on the existing poles. G. On all streets except for collectors with metered lights, lights should be staggered on either side of the road to create better uniformity (i.e. lights on one side of the road should be located approximately halfway between lights on the opposite side). In some cases the layout may need to be one- sided due to utility conflicts. If a single sided layout is required, it will be communicated to the designer during the pre-plat or Certificate of Zoning Compliance application process. H. The layout for collector streets with metered lights should be one-sided to reduce the amount of conduit, wire and service pedestals required. Streetlight Drawings – Next 6 pages Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 362 of 576 [36] Section 6 – Street Lighting March 2019 – Revised Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 363 of 576 [37] Section 6 – Street Lighting March 2019 – Revised Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 364 of 576 [38] Section 6 – Street Lighting March 2019 – Revised Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 365 of 576 [39] Section 6 – Street Lighting March 2019 – Revised Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 366 of 576 [40] Section 6 – Street Lighting March 2019 – Revised Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 367 of 576 [41] Section 6 – Street Lighting March 2019 – Revised -END OF SECTION- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 368 of 576 [42] Section 7 – Grading and Drainage March 2019 – Revised SECTION 7 GRADING AND DRAINAGE 7-1 SECTION SUMMARY: This section contains general, technical, and submittal requirements for the design of grading and drainage for a development project. 7-2 APPLICABLE STANDARDS: The requirements listed below shall apply to the design of grading and drainage. Conflicts between these requirements shall be resolved on a case-b y-case basis. A. All applicable standards as listed in Section 2-2 B. Current Construction Storm Water Management Program (CSWMP) Manual for City of Meridian Construction Projects C. Policy Manual, Sections 8000, 8200, 8300; Ada County Highway District (ACHD) (Current Edition) D. Catalog of Storm Water Best Management Practices for Idaho Cities and Counties, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (IDEQ) (Current Edition) E. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Permit for Discharges from Construction Activities (CGP) , Environmental Protection Agency (Current Edition) F. Meridian City Code (MCC), Title 11 - “Unified Development Code” (UDC), Chapter 3 7-3 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: The following sub-sections identify the general requirements for grading and drainage standards. These provisions do not apply to an individual single family home construction site/lot. Additionally, all projects impacting the Right-Of-Way (ROW) shall obtain approvals from all necessary agencies including, but not limited to, the Ada County Highway District (ACHD) and the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) as required by those agencies governing the ROW. A. Grading Requirements - Site grading shall not create or contribute to flooding, erosion, increased turbidity, siltation, or other forms of pollution in a water course. When filling, excavating, dredging, or moving earth material alters the existing grade of a site the owner/developer shall protect adjoining properties during and after construction. The tops and toes of graded slopes shall be set back from project boundaries and structures as required b y generall y accepted best practices in order to ensure safet y, provide adequate foundation support, and prevent damage resulting from water runoff or erosion. For individual lot grading within a development refer to the most currently adopted International Residential Code, International Building Code and any COM Local Amendments. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 369 of 576 [43] Section 7 – Grading and Drainage March 2019 – Revised B. Drainage Requirements, General - Per Section 11-3A-18 of the Unified Development Code (UDC), all developments are required to build adequate drainage facilities. 1. The City of Meridian reviews grading and drainage plans and related improvements for all development projects which include, but are not limited to, commercial and industrial development, parking lot construction or expansion, private road construction, and additions to existing development that may affect the generation or disposal of storm water. Off-street parking and private roads or accesses associated with multi-family residential projects are also subject to the requirements of this section. 2. The City does not exercise authority over the design, installation, operation, or maintenance of storm water conveyance, storage, or disposal systems serving public right-of-way. C. Offsite Discharges - It is the Design Professional’s responsibility to obtain approvals from any applicable agency for discharges of storm water off-site. Conditions of approval contained in a project’s Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement, or other documents approved by the Cit y Council may preclude off-site discharges regardless of other agency approvals. 7-4 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: A. Grading & Drainage Plans – In addition to the requirements of section 3 of this manual, the grading and drainage plan must include, at a minimum, finished pad elevations; finished grade flow direction arrows; location, type, and size of conveyance systems; disposal facilities; and erosion and sediment control Best Management Practices (BMP) design and details. Existing and proposed water, sewer, and irrigation improvements must also be shown on these plans. Grading and drainage plans must be stamped b y a Professional Engineer or Landscape Architect licensed in the State of Idaho. Unstamped, unsigned plans will not be accepted or reviewed. B. Drainage Calculations - Drainage calculations must be submitted with the grading and drainage plan that show the tributary area, design storm return frequency and duration, runoff volume, peak discharge, storage volumes, peak outflows and any other necessary calculations. These plans must be stamped by a Professional Engineer or Landscape Architect licensed in the State of Idaho. Unstamped, unsigned calculations will not be accepted or reviewed. Drainage calculations shall conform to the latest revision of Sections 8000 and 8200 of the ACHD Policy Manual. Submit the calculations in a professional and legible manner. The calculations must list the project title, the project address, date of last revision, and sheet number. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 370 of 576 [44] Section 7 – Grading and Drainage March 2019 – Revised C. Other Required Documents – If the storm drain system for the proposed development includes discharging storm water to facilities owned by drainage districts, irrigation districts, adjacent developments, or propert y not a part of the proposed development, a fully executed permit or agreement to discharge offsite must be submitted to the City prior to plan approval. This does not apply to s ystems owned or operated b y ACHD as ACHD would be the approving authority. The designer shall provide a copy of a soils or geotechnical report indicating existing seasonal high ground water elevations, soil classifications and percolation rates. The report shall be prepared b y a geotechnical engineer, hydrogeologist, or professional engineer licensed in the State of Idaho. 7-5 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS: A. General - All storm water generated on development projects shall be retained and disposed of within the development site. Storm water shall not be discharged to adjacent properties or public right(s)-of-way. In some cases storm water may be discharged to an existing drainage way or drainage structure if written approval of the discharge is given b y the agency having jurisdiction over the drainage way. Written approval must be provided to the City of Meridian. All storm water improvements and BMPs shall conform to the latest revision of the Catalog of Storm Water Best Management Practices for Idaho Cities and Counties, or approved equivalent. B. Materials - Unless otherwise specificall y approved, all materials used in the construction of storm water conveyance, storage, or disposal improvements shall be as specified in the most current edition of the ISPWC and City Supplemental Specifications. C. Landscaping - The City encourages integration of storm water management with landscaping. While landscaping requirements cannot be altered to accommodate certain storm water management techniques, innovative and alternative site planning which integrates both aspects will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. D. Storm Water Management Integration - The Design Professional shall utilize storm water integration as provided in UDC section 11-3B-11 where appropriate when designing landscaping requirements of projects. 7-6 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE: The design engineer, architect, or landscape architect must submit a letter of compliance to the Cit y of Meridian Public Works Department indicating that the project has been built in accordance with the submitted design plans and meets these minimum standards, prior to requesting a certificate of occupancy for an y building or final acceptance of an y development project. -END OF SECTION- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 371 of 576 [45] Section 8 – Pressure and Gravity Irrigation March 2019 - Revised SECTION 8 PRESSURE AND GRAVITY IRRIGATION 8-1 SECTION SUMMARY: This section contains guidance and requirements for the following: pressure irrigation plan sheets, pressure irrigation s ystem design & sources, gravity irrigation, and regulatory permitting 8-2 APPLICABLE STANDARDS: The requirements listed below shall apply to the design of pressure and gravity irrigation systems. Conflicts between these requirements shall be resolved on a case-by-case basis. A. All applicable standards as listed in Section 2-2 B. Meridian City Code (MCC) - Title 9, Chapter 1 “Water Use and Service” and Chapter 3 “Cross-Connection Control” C. Meridian City Code (MCC) - Title 11 “Unified Development Code” (UDC), Chapter 3 8-3 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PRESSURE IRRIGATION: All development plans shall include a plan sheet depicting the pressure irrigation (PI) system layout and design. Pressure irrigation systems will meet the requirements of MCC 9-1-28. Along with the layout sheet, the following materials must be submitted: A. If connecting to an existing s ystem, a letter of approval from the entit y that owns the system (Homeowner’s Association or Irrigation District) B. Statement explaining who will own the new s ystem The City has adopted the standard specifications and drawings prepared by the applicable Irrigation District that the system will be built in. At a minimum, these requirements must be adhered to whether or not the system is to be maintained and operated by that Irrigation District. A letter from the Design Professional will be required stating that the system operates and is constructed according to the approved plan. Each independent HOA within a development is encouraged to have their own single point connection and isolation valves for backup (shoulder season) irrigation. This will allow each HOA to decide if they will or will not activate the backup connection when surface water is unavailable. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 372 of 576 [46] Section 8 – Pressure and Gravity Irrigation March 2019 - Revised 8-4 PRESSURE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN A. Main Location - 1. Pressure irrigation mains should be designed in the proper corridors along south and west property lines. Mains shall be designed within the standard rear and side lot line utility easements or common lots. Mains shall not be designed along the front lot lines unless approved b y the City Engineer and the owner/operator of the irrigation system. 2. All pressure irrigation main crossings of public rights-of-way, private roads, access roadways/driveways shall be sleeved (C-900) and have valves located no further than 10 feet outside of the right- of-way or road/driveway. B. Meters and Backflow for Municipal Connections - 1. Water meters for municipal water single point (shoulder season) connections to the pressure irrigation system shall be located in common areas onl y. Meter location, size, and meter setter size shall be specified on the plans and designed per City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications. When a common area is not available the location shall be resolved by a case-by-case basis. 2. Cross-connections of individual lots in a subdivision between pressure irrigation and municipal water are not allowed. If a year- round source of water is not provided for the PI system, the developer must provide a backup water source for periods not during the normal irrigation season (approximately April 15 to October 15). 3. If the developer proposes to install a single point (shoulder season) connection to the City of Meridian domestic water system, an approved backflow prevention device must be installed and shall be noted on the plans. A note shall be added to the plans stating that the reduced pressure backflow assembly must be approved b y the State of Idaho, Department of Water Quality and the Water Division of the City of Meridian Public Works Department. Single points of connection may be provided for each separate s ystem, subdivision, phase, or as appropriate for h ydraulic performance and administration. 8-5 PRESSURE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SOURCES A. All pressure irrigation systems for commercial projects shall utilize recycled water as the primary source, if available. If recycled water is not available, then surface water shall be utilized. All systems must have a year-round source. If Cit y municipal water is utilized for a year-round / backup source, a single point connection between the municipal system and pressure irrigation s ystem is required. For design of this connection, see the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 373 of 576 [47] Section 8 – Pressure and Gravity Irrigation March 2019 - Revised B. Pressure irrigation plans shall show the intended point of delivery for surface water and point of connection to municipal water or irrigation well. Irrigable square footage shall be included for assessments. C. If pressure irrigation s ystem causes changes to a gravity irrigation s ystem that will affect downstream users, the developer is obligated to follow Title 42, Chapter 1 of Idaho State Code – 42-109. 8-6 GRAVITY IRRIGATION A. All open gravity irrigation ditches shall be tiled, per MCC Title 11 (UDC). B. Pipe diameter, length, slope and cleanout boxes/manholes shall be noted on the plans. Spacing of boxes/manholes shall not exceed 400 feet with a minimum inside dimension of 4 feet b y 4 feet. Irrigation box dimensions may be smaller if less than 2 feet deep. Spacing of boxes/manholes may exceed 400 feet if entity responsible for maintenance can verify they are capable of cleaning irrigation lines longer than 400 feet. C. Any modifications to existing gravit y irrigation systems require the applicable irrigation district’s approval of the design. It is the developer’s responsibility to get the irrigation district’s approval for modifications made to an existing irrigation facilit y owned and operated b y an irrigation district. Written approval from the irrigation district must be provided to the City of Meridian. D. If downstream users will be affected b y changes to a gravit y irrigation system, the developer is obligated by State Code Title 42, Chapter 1, Article 42-109 to ensure all downstream users receive their share of water at pre-development times and quantities. 8-7 REGULATORY PERMITTING A. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer to obtain compliance with any Section 404 permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. B. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer to obtain compliance with any National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agenc y (EPA). 8-8 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL REQUIREMENTS A complete and thorough operations and maintenance manual should be developed for the irrigation system and turned over to the HOA when the development has been completed. -END OF SECTION- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 374 of 576 [48] Section 9 – Class ‘A’ Recycled Water System March 2019 - Revised SECTION 9 CLASS ‘A’ RECYCLED WATER SYSTEM 9-1 SECTION SUMMARY: This section contains guidance and requirements for the following: recycled water use agreements, recycled water suppl y, recycled water main design, recycled water system appurtenances, the use of booster pumps, backflow preventers and irrigation and drainage crossings for Class A recycled water s ystems (as defined in IDAPA 58.01.16). 9-2 APPLICABLE STANDARDS:. The requirements listed below shall apply to the design of Class A recycled water systems. Conflicts between these requirements shall be resolved on a case-by-case basis. A. All applicable standards as listed in Section 2-2 B. IDAPA 58.01.16, “Wastewater Rules” C. Guidance for Reclamation and Reuse of Municipal and Industrial Wastewater (IDEQ) D. Current Meridian Recycled Water Master Plan Update E. Current Meridian Reuse Permit (from DEQ) F. Meridian City Code (MCC) - Title 9, Chapter 3 “Cross-Connection Control” 9-3 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: The design of recycled water facilities that will be owned and operated b y the City of Meridian, including the preparation of Contract Documents, shall be conducted under the direction of a professional engineer registered in the State of Idaho. The design of recycled water irrigation facilities to be privately owned and the preparation of Contract Documents shall be done under the direction of a professional landscape architect, civil engineer, or mechanical engineer registered in the State of Idaho. The recycled water system, including both publicl y and privately owned facilities, shall be separate and independent of an y potable water s ystem. 9-4 USE AGREEMENT REQUIRED: Customers must submit a completed Recycled Water Use Agreement (“RWUA”) to the City and be issued an executed cop y before the City will initiate recycled water service. Connections to the recycled water system can only be made after applying for and obtaining a RWUA from the City’s Public Works Department. The Agreement shall be issued on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the terms of the City Reuse Permit. 9-5 RECYCLED WATER SUPPLY PRESSURE: Recycled water s ystems must adhere to the following conditions: A. The Design Professional should contact the Public Works Engineering Division to determine the service pressure available. The Design Professional then designs for the available pressure. Typical recycled water service pressure is between 40 and 80 pounds per square inch (psi). Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 375 of 576 [49] Section 9 – Class ‘A’ Recycled Water System March 2019 - Revised B. If adequate recycled water service pressure is not available, the Design Professional should contact the City to discuss contributing to a recycled water booster system upgrade. If the recycled water service pressure is above 80 psi, the user is responsible for providing a pressure regulator downstream of the meter to obtain the correct pressure. C. Where dual connections to the City potable water system are approved, the operating pressure for recycled water s ystems shall be 5-10 psi less than operating pressure in potable water s ystems at the point of connection. 9-6 RECYCLED WATER DEMAND: For the design of recycled water distribution systems serving commercial areas, water demand shall be determined on a case-b y-case basis. 9-7 RECYCLED WATER MAIN DESIGN: Design requirements for a recycled water main layout, size, and location shall conform to the Meridian Recycled Water Master Plan and Engineering Division water modeling requirements. A. Recycled water mains owned and operated b y the City of Meridian shall be eight (8) inches inside diameter minimum. Design should limit maximum velocity to 5 ft./sec. B. Contribution toward the upgrade of distribution mains or pumping facilities may be required in order to meet system demands. C. A force main alignment that is straight between valves is preferred. However, pipe joint deflection not to exceed ½ of the Pipe Manufacturer’s allowable deflection is allowed, but verification/evidence of the deflection angle shall be provided by the contractor. D. Recycled water mains shall be shown in the plan view and must identify pipe size, location of valves, air release/vacuum valves, blow-offs, potable water lines, services, and all other public or private appurtenances including easements. Recycled water mains shall be shown in the profile view where potential conflicts with other utilities exist. E. Recycled water mains shall be installed within public rights-of-way and/or dedicated City easements (see Section 2-15). F. Recycled water mains shall maintain a minimum clearance from all other utilities of at least 12 inches vertical and 4 feet horizontal, except potable and non-potable water pipelines which shall maintain minimum separation recommendations as set forth by the Idaho Rules for Public Drinking Water S ystems. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 376 of 576 [50] Section 9 – Class ‘A’ Recycled Water System March 2019 - Revised G. Recycled water mains shall be located where approved by the Ada County Highway District, with approved variances from other utilities until a corridor has been approved and accepted by the Utility Coordinating Council (UCC). Whenever possible, appurtenances should be located to avoid vehicle wheel paths. H. Minimum cover over recycled water lines under section-line and mid- section line roadways that have not been full y developed, or in unpaved areas, shall be five (5) feet from top of pipe to finished grade. In all other areas, minimum cover shall be four (4) feet from top of pipe to finished grade. Recycled water main depths of greater than six (6) feet shall be approved by the Engineering Division on a case- b y-case basis. Where deeper mains are approved, include valve stem risers. I. Service connections to recycled transmission mains shall not be allowed unless specifically approved by the City Engineer. J. Dead-end recycled water mains that will not be extended in the future will be terminated with a blow-off assembly and appropriate fittings. Temporary dead ends (such as at subdivision phase lines) shall have a blow-off assembl y per City Specifications. Blow-offs shall be located in a manner that enables eas y access and maintenance including proper easements. Recycled water mains in commercial properties should be designed to connect to neighboring properties to complete current or future loops or grids. 9-8 RECYCLED WATER SYSTEM APPURTENANCES: Recycled water s ystem appurtenances discussed herein include valves, blow-off assemblies, recycled water service lines, meter setters, meter boxes, meter pits, recycled water meters, backflow prevention devices, and booster pumps. Other appurtenances may include air relief valves, pressure relief valves, and bypass meters. A. Gate Valves and Blow-off Assemblies - 1. Minimum of 2 valves shall be provided at T fittings, and 3 valves at cross fittings for local and collector roadways. 2. A minimum of 3 valves shall be provided at T fittings, and 4 valves at cross fittings for all arterial roadways. Exceptions to this rule may be allowed by the City Engineer when hot tapping active recycled water mains is required. 3. Size-on-size hot taps are not allowed unless approved by the City Engineer. 4. In commercial areas, valve spacing should not exceed 500 feet. 5. In residential areas, valve spacing should not exceed 800 feet. 6. In areas without customer connections, valve spacing shall not exceed ¼ mile. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 377 of 576 [51] Section 9 – Class ‘A’ Recycled Water System March 2019 - Revised 7. Existing valves (and blow-off assemblies when applicable) that are no longer needed shall be abandoned by removal and installation of a blind flange or plug, as appropriate. B. Recycled Water Service Lines and Services - 1. Recycled water services shall be clearly called out by standard detail and size on plan sheets. 2. Recycled water service lines from the recycled water distribution main to the propert y shall be installed at the time the main is constructed within platted and recorded developments whenever possible. 3. Standard size of a recycled water service line shall be one (1) inch. Developments with higher recycled water demand shall be provided with larger service lines as determined by the Consulting Engineer and subject to approval b y Development Services. 4. Separate recycled water services are required for commercial sites that include non-consumptive water uses that return water to the sewer s ystem. This is necessary to facilitate correct sewer billing. 5. Services should be aligned so they are at 90°angles to the recycled water main. If developments are re-platted, existing services may need to be abandoned to meet this requirement. 6. Whenever possible, recycled water services shall not be placed in problematic areas such as high traffic areas, and within 5 feet of building foundations. 7. Whenever possible, avoid running recycled water service lines through underground storm water filtration beds or under drainage swales. See the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC for sleeving requirements for services through storm water facilities. 8. Any unused recycled water services must be abandoned at the recycled water mains by closing the corporation stop, removing the service line, and installing a cap or copper disc on the back of the fitting as approved b y the Project Inspector. Commercial services shall be abandoned at the recycled water main by removing the gate valve and installing a blind flange. C. Recycled Water Meters – 1. Recycled water meters shall be installed on all recycled water services according to City Code requirements. 2. Meters will be installed by the Water Division of Public Works after building permits are issued and fees are paid, not when recycled water service lines are installed. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 378 of 576 [52] Section 9 – Class ‘A’ Recycled Water System March 2019 - Revised 3. Installation of recycled water meters b y anyone other than the Meridian Water Division is prohibited. 4. The installation of meter pits and all meter setter appurtenances are the responsibility of the developer’s contractor. 5. Recycled water meters over 1 inch shall match the size of service lines needed. D. Backflow Prevention - A backflow preventer will be required on any single point connections between recycled water and any other water source. 1. Refer to IDEQ requirements, City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications, and ISPWC for backflow prevention assembly specifications and requirements. E. Booster Pumps - 1. Customers that provide booster pumps to increase the operating pressure must identify the pumping systems as recycled water, avoid the release of recycled water in an uncontrolled manner, and provide proper drainage of the packing seal water. 2. At least one sign in English and Spanish must be posted on the booster pump premises. The signage must be readil y seen by all operations personnel that are in the working area. 3. The Public Works Department will require a backflow prevention assembly to protect the recycled water distribution system from potential back pressure that ma y be caused by using booster pumps. 4. Any potable water used as seal water for rec ycled water pump seals must be adequatel y protected agai nst backflow. 9-9 RECYCLED WATER CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS: A recycled water customer must comply with applicable federal, state, and local regulations regarding the use of recycled water. A. The following guidelines for using recycled water must be adhered to: 1. Commercial recycled water users shall designate an on-site contact responsible for compliance with regulations regarding the use of recycled water. 2. The City may assign a specific recycled water usage schedule for the customer to adhere to. 3. The recycled water customer shall obtain prior approval from the City and IDEQ for proposed changes or modifications to recycled water facilities per the RWUA. 4. Signage indicating the use of recycled water shall be required and shall comply with applicable federal, state and local regulations and the City of Meridian’s Supplemental Specifications. -END OF SECTION- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 379 of 576 [53] Section 10 – Streetscapes March 2019 - Revised SECTION 10 STREETSCAPES 10-1 SECTION SUMMARY: This section contains guidance and requirements for the following: streetscape site plan drawings, standards, and design. 10-2 APPLICABLE STANDARDS: The requirements listed below shall apply to design of any streetscapes. Conflicts between the requirements of these streetscape improvement standards shall be resolved on a case- b y-case basis. A. All applicable standards as listed in Section 2-2 B. Meridian City Code (MCC) - Title 8, Chapter 1 “City Core Streetscape” C. Meridian City Code (MCC) - Title 11 “Unified Development Code” (UDC), Chapter 3 D. Downtown Meridian City Core Street Cross-section Master Plan E. Current Meridian Parks and Recreation Department Specifications F. American Association of Nurserymen Standards 10-3 REQUIREMENTS FOR STREETS WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY: The requirements of this section pertain to streetscape elements for which the City h as authority. Geometric and pavement design of public roadways are governed and approved b y the agency responsible for that specific right-of-way, either the Ada County Highway District (ACHD) or the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD). 10-4 FEDERAL AND STATE HIGHWAYS: For development along interstate and state highways (including, but not limited to, State Highway 69, State Highway 55, State Highway 20-26, and Interstate 84), see UDC section 11-3-H. 10-5 ADA COUNTY ROADWAYS EXCLUDING THE CITY CORE: For development along roadways maintained b y the Ada County Highway District outside the City Core, see UDC 11-6-C. See Drawing 10-A (attached) for a map of the City Core. 10-6 CITY CORE STREETSCAPES: Within the City Core (see Drawing 10-A), the City of Meridian has specific standards and requirements for development and maintenance of streetscape improvements. When required, streetscape improvements along all public roadways within the City Core shall comply with the following standards: A. Plan Requirements - The City requires site plan drawings for an y proposed improvements. 1. Requirements of Site Plans: The following shall be required on the plan: Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 380 of 576 [54] Section 10 – Streetscapes March 2019 - Revised a) A vicinity map or equivalent b) Demarcation of property lines and Ada County Highway District right-of-wa y c) Location of existing improvements including those adjacent to neighboring properties, called out with descriptions d) Location of existing utilities and utility services e) All proposed paving, tree grates, trees, street furnishings, and other improvements f) A north arrow and standard architectural or engineering scale g) A legend indicating an y s ym bols used in plans h) Indicate adherence with any spacing requirements, existing spacing plans, or streetscape improvement relocation requirements 2. Requirements for Spacing Plans: A spacing plan for the street extending to the block limits shall be required for installation of street trees and street lights when a spacing plan does not already exist on file with the City. The following shall be required on the spacing plan: a) Demarcation of property lines and Ada County Highway District right-of-way for the full street length b) Location of existing streetscape improvements and impediments for the full street length c) Adherence with Design of La yout requirements for street lights and street trees along full street length (see section 10-6-D of this document) d) A north arrow and standard architectural or engineering scale e) A legend indicating an y s ym bols used in plans B. Design Standards - Streetscape elements shall be designed b y an architect, landscape architect, or civil engineer in conformance with these standards and ISPWC Standard Specifications. 1. Streetscape Requirements: Streetscape improvements shall, at a minimum, be installed in the immediate frontage of the subject propert y. 2. Surface Material and Treatment: Standard finished surface materials are required as set by each zone of the streetscape, as defined in MCC 8-1-1. a) Street Furnishing Zone – Concrete unit pavers, per Meridian Parks and Recreation Department Specifications, shall be the finished surface material within the Street Furnishing Zone. b) Clear Zone – Concrete sidewalks shall be the finished surface material within the Clear Zone. c) Use Zone – Enhanced concrete paving shall be the finished surface material within the Use Zone. Enhanced concrete paving shall be scored or colored to distinguish it from the Clear Zone. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 381 of 576 [55] Section 10 – Streetscapes March 2019 - Revised 3. Street Furnishings: All street furnishings shall conform to MCC 8- 1. Street lights shall conform to Section 6 of this document. Benches, trash receptacles, bicycle racks, and other approved furnishings shall conform to Meridian Parks and Recreation Department Specifications. Improvements such as lights, tree grates, newsstands, and planters are required to be spaced four feet (4’) or more from other streetscape improvements. Newsstands may be placed adjacent to other newsstands, provided they are a minimum of four feet (4’) from other streetscape improvements. 4. Street Trees: Class III trees shall be placed in tree grates at approximately 32’ spacing. Trees shall be placed to avoid conflicts with alleys and street lights. Where Class III trees may conflict with overhead power lines, tree selection shall be approved b y the City Arborist. There shall be a minimum of 6 trees per block where possible. Trees shall be installed per the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department Specifications. 5. Tree grates: Tree grates shall conform to the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department Specifications. C. Specific Standards - Within the City Core, streets running north or south and east or west have standards specific to each street direction. Main Street has specific standards which deviate from other north/south roads. Use zones are defined in MCC 8-1. See the Downtown Meridian Cit y Core Street Cross-section Master Plan for the preferred cross sections. 1. East/West Streetscape a) Dimensions – Minimum distance from face of building to back of curb shall be 18 feet. Minimum furnishing zone shall be 8 feet; minimum clear zone shall be 10 feet without use zone or 5 feet with use zone. Minimum use zone where exists shall be 5 feet. b) Street Trees – Trees shall be allowed from the following selection: Botanical Name Common Name Size Gleditsia tricanthos 'Imperial' Imperial Honey Locust (limited use) 3" cal. B&B Acer platanoides 'Fairview' Fairview Maple 3" cal. B&B Acer platanoides 'Parkway' Parkway Maple 3" cal. B&B Acer platanoides 'Deborah' Deborah Maple 3" cal. B&B Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Patmore' Patmore Ash 3" cal. B&B Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Urbanite' Urbanite Ash 3" cal. B&B Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 382 of 576 [56] Section 10 – Streetscapes March 2019 - Revised 2. North/South Streetscape (Except Main Street) a) Dimensions – Minimum distance from face of building to back of curb shall be 13 feet. Minimum furnishing zone shall be 8 feet; minimum clear zone shall be 5 feet. Where right-of-way allows, use zone shall be a minimum of 5 feet. b) Street Trees – Trees shall be allowed from the following selection: Botanical Name Common Name Size Gleditsia tricanthos 'Imperial' Imperial Honey Locust (limited use) 3" cal. B&B Acer platanoides 'Fairview' Fairview Maple 3" cal. B&B Acer platanoides 'Parkway' Parkway Maple 3" cal. B&B Acer platanoides 'Deborah' Deborah Maple 3" cal. B&B Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Patmore' Patmore Ash 3" cal. B&B Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Urbanite' Urbanite Ash 3" cal. B&B 3. Main Street a) Dimensions – Minimum distance from face of building to back of curb shall be 13 feet. Minimum furnishing zone shall be 8 feet; minimum clear zone shall be 5 feet. Where right-of-way allows, use zone shall be a minimum of 5 feet. B. Street Trees – Trees shall be allowed from the following selection: Botanical Name Common Name Size Gleditsia tricanthos 'Imperial' Imperial Honey Locust (limited use) 3" cal. B&B D. Design of Layout 1. An entire street block shall be analyzed to determine the spacing of street trees and street lights, even if only one part of the total block will be improved as part of the proposed improvements. 2. The control points of each block are the intersection corners, with the distance in between being the total block length. The total block length divided by the required spacing of the improvements will determine the total number of street trees and street lights required. Once the locations of the required improvements for the block have been estimated, then the location of the improvements needed for a particular part of the block can be determined. E. Streetscape Improvement Relocation - The following standards apply when relocating existing streetscape improvements. 1. Existing improvements within the furnishing zone ma y be adjusted and moved provided that all damage to hardscape and other improvements Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 383 of 576 [57] Section 10 – Streetscapes March 2019 - Revised occurring as a result of relocation is restored concurrently to a like new state. 2. Relocated improvements shall comply with all City Improvement Standards and Supplemental Specifications. 3. Any modification to existing street lights shall be consistent with City Standards and applicable spacing plans. 4. Replacement trees shall be installed per City Standards and applicable spacing plans. Drawing 10-A: City Core Map -END OF SECTION- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 384 of 576 [58] Section 11 – Landscaping March 2019 - Revised SECTION 11 LANDSCAPING 11-1 SECTION SUMMARY: This section contains guidance and references for landscaping requirements. 11-2 APPLICABLE STANDARDS: The requirements listed below shall apply to the design of landscaping. Conflicts between these requirements shall be resolved on a case-by-case basis. A. Meridian City Code (MCC) - Title 11 “Unified Development Code” (UDC) B. Downtown Meridian City Core Street Cross-section Master Plan C. American Association of Nurserymen Standards 11-3 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: Landscaping materials and installation associated with roadways, parking lots, city and private parks, irrigation and storm water facilities, and other similar projects that involve landscaping as required by MCC 11-3B and the Downtown Meridian City Core Street Cross-section Master Plan shall be shown on design plans and constructed in accordance with the requirements provided herein. -END OF SECTION- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 385 of 576 [59] Section 12 – Waterways and Floodplains March 2019 - Revised SECTION 12 WATERWAYS AND FLOODPLAINS 12-1 SECTION SUMMARY: This section contains guidance and requirements for the following: floodplain development and stream protection, including application and plan set provisions. 12-2 APPLICABLE STANDARDS: The requirements listed below shall apply to the design of projects impacting waterways. Conflicts between these requirements shall be resolved on a case-b y- case basis. A. All applicable standards as listed in Section 2-2 B. Meridian City Code (MCC) - Title 10, Chapter 6 “Flood Damage Prevention” C. Meridian City Code (MCC) - Title 11 “Unified Development Code” (UDC) 12-3 PROJECTS IMPACTING WATERWAYS A. All projects impacting waterways shall be designed to meet the standards of UDC §11-1A-1 - Natural Waterways; §11-3A-6 – Ditches, Laterals, Canals, or Drainage Courses; and/or §11-3A-9 – Natural Features, as applicable. 12-4 DEVELOPMENT WITHIN MERIDIAN FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT A. All projects located within the Meridian Floodplain Overlay District shall be designed to meet the standards of MCC§10-6. B. Floodplain Development Permit Application: 1. All applicable sections of floodplain development permit applications shall be completed. 2. All floodplain development permit applications shall have the application signed b y both the design professional of record and the owner or the owner’s legal agent for the project. 3. All floodplain development permit applications shall contain the necessary information required in MCC §10-6, and shall be submitted to the Community Development Department with the applicable fee payment. 4. All floodplain development permit applications shall include hardcop y paper and electronic files of the applicable hydrologic and h ydraulic studies necessary to satisfy MCC §10-6. All studies shall be stamped and signed by the Design Professional. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 386 of 576 [60] Section 12 – Waterways and Floodplains March 2019 - Revised 5. All floodplain development permit applications shall include two hardcopy plan sets and electronic files illustrating the proposed project, and containing the minimum information specified in MCC 10-6-4A2. In addition, plans shall illustrate the following, as applicable: a) Floodplain Overlay District boundary b) Floodway Overlay District boundary c) FEMA regulated 100-year Special Flood Hazard Area d) FEMA regulated floodway 6. Both sets of plans submitted shall be stamped and signed b y the Design Professional. -END OF SECTION- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 387 of 576 �`/rE IDIIZDA 0 ANx--I - H� CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 T Project File Name/Number: Item Title: AP Invoices for Payment - 5-10-19 - $154,300.44 Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.T. Presenter: Estimated Time for P resentation: Title of I tem - AP Invoices for Payment - 05/10/19 - $154,300.44 C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate A P I nvoices for Payment C over Memo 5/16/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate F inance.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/16/2019 - 11:34 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 388 of 576 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund BDPA INC Registration C.Ritchie & L.Berg,HR Mgrs Meeting, BOI05/10/19 120.00 01 General Fund IDAHO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE Registration:M.Horvath,DUI Ivestig,Grangeville,ID 04/11/19 25.00 01 General Fund MASTERCARD 220/MC#1 Fire 4-30-19 Statement,1,310.44 01 General Fund MASTERCARD 220/MC#2 Fire 4-30-19 Statement,11,946.64 01 General Fund MASTERCARD 220/MC#3 Fire 4-30-19 Statement,3,843.77 01 General Fund MASTERCARD 220/MC#4 Fire 4-30-19 Statement,2,050.23 01 General Fund MASTERCARD 220/MC#5 Fire 4-30-19 Statement,18.00 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC City#2 #0561 April charges 19.99 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC City#6 #0603 April Charges 258.80 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC City#7 #0587 April charges 268.70 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Clerks#0512 April charges 723.97 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC ComDev BS #2 3/2019 1,603.55 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC ComDev#0876 April charges 723.18 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC IT#0179 April charges 2,803.43 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Legal#0868 April charges 1,142.00 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC May#2 #0769 April charges 288.25 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Parks #1 4/30/19 Statement -941.44 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Parks #2 4/30/19 Statement -493.00 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC PD #3 4/30/19 - Statement -708.05 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC PD #4 4/30/19 - Statement -817.93 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC PD #5 4/30/19 - Statement -943.30 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC PD#10 April charges 636.45 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC PD#2 April charges 2,183.89 Total 01 General Fund 33,870.01 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC City#6 #0603 April Charges 511.27 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC ComDev#0876 April charges 307.85 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC IT#0179 April charges 817.20 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC PW #1 04/30/2019 Statement -4,165.99 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC PW #2 04/30/2019 STATEMENT -1,834.76 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC WAT#0538 April charges 809.78 Date: 5/10/19 12:32:29 PM Page: 1Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 389 of 576 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC WW#0611 April Charges 2,392.08 60 Enterprise Fund MINUTEMAN, INC.19-0168: WellMaint-Security Upgrade CLIQ Connect Software 35,000.00 60 Enterprise Fund MINUTEMAN, INC.Cliq Connect Keys, Lock Hardware for Wells; Qty 23; WO#15078 74,591.50 Total 60 Enterprise Fund 120,430.43 Report Total 154,300.44 Date: 5/10/19 12:32:29 PM Page: 2Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 390 of 576 CIDIAN*,----- if,IZ�J CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 U Project File Name/Number: Item Title: AP Invoices for Payment - 5-15-19 - $2,075,535.01 Meeting Notes: 0 I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.U. Presenter: Estimated Time for P resentation: Title of I tem - AP Invoices for Payment - 05/15/19 S pecial - $2,075,535.01 C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate A P I nvoices for Payment C over Memo 5/16/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate F inance.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/16/2019 - 11:35 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 391 of 576 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund BLUE CROSS OF IDAHO May 2019 Blue Cross Premiums 327,250.14 01 General Fund BPA HEALTH, INC.EAP Premiums, May 2019, 518 employees 1,599.84 01 General Fund DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF IDAHO Group 0133-0000 May 2019 20,635.71 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE INSURANCE FUND #36670, Workers Comp Payroll Premium 1/1/19-4/1/19 142,304.74 01 General Fund INTERNATIONAL CRIME FREE ASSOCIATION INC Registration: S.Herrick, Crime Free Multi Housing Inst Cours 275.00 01 General Fund JEREMY LINDLEY PerDiem:J.Lindley,Suspect Interview,OakHarbor,WA 137.50 01 General Fund JOE MILLER PerDiem:J.Miller,Suspect Interview,OakHarbor,WA 137.50 01 General Fund MASTERCARD Mc HR#0520 April Charges 6,008.91 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Parks#3 #0835 April charges 1,774.36 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Parks#4 #4984 April charges 356.22 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC PD # 7 4/30/19 - Statement -894.21 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC PD # 9 4/30/19 - Statement -211.53 01 General Fund NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS NCPERS Vol Life Insurance Premiums May 2019 736.00 01 General Fund NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY May 2019 New York Life Insurance 873.02 01 General Fund NORTHWEST FIRE FIGHTERS BENEFITS TRUST Acct# 52 NWFFT May 2019 105,821.97 01 General Fund SARAH HERRICK Per Diem:S.Herrick,CrimeFreeMultiHousingInstCertTraining 248.50 01 General Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE 02065-001 Life Insurance Premiums May 2019 4,286.55 01 General Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE 02065-001 LongTermDisability Insurance Premiums May 2019 6,415.55 01 General Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE 02065-001 ShortTermDisability Insurance Premiums May 2019 5,126.78 01 General Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE Group #2065A United Heritage Vol Life Ins May 2019 4,851.03 01 General Fund VISION SERVICE PLAN #30 044489 0001 May 2019 Premiums 4,190.68 01 General Fund WILLAMETTE DENTAL OF IDAHO, INC Willamette Dental Premiums 05/19 6,141.70 Total 01 General Fund 640,277.44 60 Enterprise Fund BLUE CROSS OF IDAHO May 2019 Blue Cross Premiums 117,596.30 60 Enterprise Fund BPA HEALTH, INC.EAP Premiums, May 2019, 518 employees 451.44 60 Enterprise Fund DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF IDAHO Group 0133-0000 May 2019 7,062.79 60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO STATE INSURANCE FUND #36670, Workers Comp Payroll Premium 1/1/19-4/1/19 30,766.26 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD Mc HR#0520 April Charges 2,847.50 Date: 5/15/19 09:18:30 AM Page: 1Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 392 of 576 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS NCPERS Vol Life Insurance Premiums May 2019 192.00 60 Enterprise Fund REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.Republic Trash Services April 2019 1,267,132.97 60 Enterprise Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE 02065-001 Life Insurance Premiums May 2019 1,288.10 60 Enterprise Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE 02065-001 LongTermDisability Insurance Premiums May 2019 1,580.84 60 Enterprise Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE 02065-001 ShortTermDisability Insurance Premiums May 2019 1,287.26 60 Enterprise Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE Group #2065A United Heritage Vol Life Ins May 2019 871.07 60 Enterprise Fund VISION SERVICE PLAN #30 044489 0001 May 2019 Premiums 1,478.99 60 Enterprise Fund WILLAMETTE DENTAL OF IDAHO, INC Willamette Dental Premiums 05/19 2,702.05 Total 60 Enterprise Fund 1,435,257.57 Report Total 2,075,535.01 Date: 5/15/19 09:18:30 AM Page: 2Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 393 of 576 EIDIANC-- I DAJ CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 V Project File Name/Number: Item Title: AP Invoices for Payment - 5-22-19 - $1,709,577.61 Meeting Notes: 9 I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.V. Presenter: Estimated Time for P resentation: Title of I tem - AP Invoices for Payment - 05/22/19 - $1,709,577.61 C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate A P I nvoices for Payment C over Memo 5/16/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate F inance.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/16/2019 - 11:35 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 394 of 576 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund A-1 STAMP & MABEL'S LABELS Office Supplies 20.00 01 General Fund ADA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE Inmate Housing for April 2019 896.66 01 General Fund ASPHALT DRIVEWAYS & PATCHING, INC 19-0245: Lemp-Larkwood Pathway Paving 14,990.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.Street light damaged- Ins claim. Pole 1561B 4/29/19 3,959.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.Street light Maintenance 30687C 05/05/19 94.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.Street light Maintenance 4017C 05/05/19 94.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.Street light Maintenance 51783C 05/05/19 94.00 01 General Fund BOISE MOBILE EQUIPMENT, INC Driver Side Seat Covers for Units # 154 & 142 364.00 01 General Fund BRICON, INC 19-0247 pathway installation for Kleiner ADA fishing dock 10,100.00 01 General Fund BRICON, INC concrete slab install at Settlers Park south of shop 3,057.84 01 General Fund BRICON, INC Kleiner Park bandshell shade concrete replacement 8,100.00 01 General Fund BROWNELLS Firearms Parts 275.13 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC LOF - Unit#25 50.00 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC LOF for Unit # 159 55.00 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC LOF for Unit # 160 55.00 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC LOF, AC Belt & AC Belt Tensioner for Unit # 162 397.03 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC LOF, AC Belt, Oil Cooler Lines & AC Performance Check #139 399.92 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC LOF, Post Evoc Safety Check, Upper Motor Mount Unit#157 259.75 01 General Fund BSN SPORTS, INC.home plate softball equipment - qty 3 206.85 01 General Fund BSN SPORTS, INC.pickleballs for Homecourt - qty 16 sets 229.82 01 General Fund C&B OPERATIONS LLC 19-0285 John Deere 9009A Terrain Cut Mower for Discovery x 1 64,827.75 01 General Fund Campbell Tractor Co.John Deere 1600 mower #3 repairs 5,121.19 01 General Fund CANYON HONDA Oil Change for Unit # 527 73.59 01 General Fund CANYON HONDA Oil, Clutch, Air Cleaner, Svc, Rear Brakes, Water Pump 1,170.70 01 General Fund COMMERCIAL TIRE 220/Tire disposal, old tires at various stations 57.50 01 General Fund CONSOLIDATED SUPPLY COMPANY toilet parts for Settlers Park x 2; dumbell wrench x 1 23.68 01 General Fund CURT'S DISCOUNT SHOOTERS SUPPLY Firearm Suppressor w/Muzzle Device - Qty 2 1,550.00 01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY chain for Tully Park trash cans - qty 8 6.32 01 General Fund DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS antenna cables - qty 4 192.40 01 General Fund DEVINASPRE MASONRY Masonry Repair on Kleiner Bandshell Retaining Wall 8,950.00 01 General Fund DISASTER KLEENUP Repair Water Damage at Station 1 1,587.26 01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER SERVICES, INC. cradlepoint installation vehicle #14 322.00 01 General Fund FAMILY TANG SOO DO instructor fee - Martial Arts 4/5-4/30/19 - qty 15 452.00 01 General Fund FAMILY TANG SOO DO instructor fee - Smiling Tigers 4/5-4/26/19 - qty 3 96.00 Date: 5/16/19 10:41:00 AM Page: 1Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 395 of 576 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund FAST EDDYS 19-0302 Lic#C18641: Replace 4 tires Blue Ford Fusion 536.04 01 General Fund FAST EDDYS 19-0302: Lic#C19608: Replace 4 tires Gray Ford Fusion 536.04 01 General Fund FASTENAL COMPANY bench hardware for Heroes Park - qty 102 22.21 01 General Fund FASTENAL COMPANY credit on hardware for Heroes bench board replacements x 375 (67.27) 01 General Fund FASTENAL COMPANY hardware for Heroes Park bench board replacements x 627 124.52 01 General Fund FIRE CODE CONSULTANTS NORTHWEST 19-0031 TO #10925.a Comm Residential Bldg. Plan Review Svc' 138.23 01 General Fund FRAMEWORK MEETINGS AND DESTINATIONS 4 registrations for NWCDI-2019-Arial,Campbell,Linan,Tabarini 1,650.00 01 General Fund GALLERY HOMES IDAHO LLC Refund:WaterMeter and Assmt, in Suez District 4,387.18 01 General Fund GEOTEK, INC.19-0032 TO #10927.a Commercial & Residential Bldg. Inspect 22,605.00 01 General Fund GREG REEDER Glock Engraving for Retirement - Jim Miller 44.20 01 General Fund GREGG BARNEY EXCAVATION Refund: 6017 N. Claret Cup Way Pulled Wrong Permit 50.00 01 General Fund HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS cart tires - qty 8 63.56 01 General Fund HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS house credit - return from #870244 for cart tires - qty 8 (63.92) 01 General Fund HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS partial tax credit on house credit for cart tires #02596749 (0.36) 01 General Fund HENINGER ENTERPRISES, LLC Fume Hood Test in Evidence 85.00 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Tape, Bucket, Utility Knife, Bungee Cords for Shop 45.49 01 General Fund IDAHO LINES & SIGNS LLC Stripe Kleiner Park Parking Lot 4,750.00 01 General Fund IDAHO POST ACADEMY Training Registration for B. Lueddeke 80.00 01 General Fund IDAHO POST ACADEMY Training Registration for D.Moe 600.00 01 General Fund IDAHO POST ACADEMY Training Registration for L. Sunada 80.00 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE POLICE Office Supplies 565.25 01 General Fund IMPACT RADIO GROUP Promotion of S2019 RX Take Back for MADC (Radio)1,750.00 01 General Fund INT'L ASSOC OF FIRE CHIEFS 220/IAFC Dues, JB,CB,BC,KF,MN,TR,KW 07/01/19-06/30/20 1,820.00 01 General Fund INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 2015 IRC Flashcards A. Gustafson 25.50 01 General Fund INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL NFPA Fire alarm code book - electricial inspectors 101.55 01 General Fund INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL Penciles Building safety month 6.50 01 General Fund L.N. CURTIS AND SONS 220/E-36 equiopment, two 50ft sections lifeline rope 136.46 01 General Fund LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER Exmark 48 mower flat tire repair at Kleiner Park 19.99 01 General Fund LOGMEIN USA INC GoToMeeting-Pro, GoToTraining Pro Service, OpenVoice Integra 3,100.80 01 General Fund MADDYN HOMES LLC Refund ID Access Fee for NSF Orig CR19-489-05/10/19 2.50 Date: 5/16/19 10:41:00 AM Page: 2Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 396 of 576 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund MERIDIAN CHAMBER of COMMERCE Journal Communicaitons Tourism Mktg insert-Livibility Mag 2,500.00 01 General Fund MOTIONS DANCE STUDIO instructor fee - Ballet, Tap, Jazz 4/1-4/30/19 - qty 21 548.00 01 General Fund MOTIONS DANCE STUDIO instructor fee-Ballet,Tap,Capoeira,Dazzle/Dance,Lyrical... 2,404.00 01 General Fund MOTOROLA APX 6500 Radio Head for Mobile Radio 776.48 01 General Fund NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC.liquid fertilizer for Settlers, Bear Creek, Kleiner x 7.31 t 3,575.14 01 General Fund NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC.Makaze & Amine chemicals for pathways - qty 40 gallons 695.40 01 General Fund NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC.Turflon Ester Ultra weed killer for various parks x 2 gal 300.24 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.15 inch ruler 3.84 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.5 and 8 tab dividers and labels 69.91 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Calendar Desk Pad Qty.1 13.79 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Calendar Deskpad J.Iverson Qty.1 7.48 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Coffee Qty.2 ; Mousepad Qty.1 35.31 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Credit: Calendar DeskpadJ.Iverson;See Inv#308301603001 Qty.1 (7.48) 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Mouse, M570, Wrls, Trackbal 28.55 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.office supplies/phone headset k. hibbard 210.31 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.plastic folder, ergo kybord(Krausch) and engineering scales 21.93 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Pop up sticky notes Qty 1 pack 8.02 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Toner, batteries, 3-tier organizer, binders, cor. tape, pen 297.88 01 General Fund OFFICE TEAM 19-0067 w/e 5/3/19 John Hale Records Retention 277.35 01 General Fund OFFICE TEAM 19-0301 Temp Permit Tech for Bldg dept S. Kaiser 5/3/19 858.00 01 General Fund OFFICE TEAM 19-0301 Temp Permit Tech for Bldg Svcs. S. Kaiser 4/26/19 858.00 01 General Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Toner for Evidence 463.60 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER emissions test for fleet truck 20 - license C19062 15.00 01 General Fund PAVEMENT SPECIALTIES OF IDAHO, INC blowout & fill asphalt cracks at Bear Creek Park 624.00 01 General Fund PAVEMENT SPECIALTIES OF IDAHO, INC blowout & fill asphalt cracks at Fuller Park 986.00 01 General Fund PAVEMENT SPECIALTIES OF IDAHO, INC blowout & fill asphalt cracks at Heroes Park 961.00 01 General Fund PAVEMENT SPECIALTIES OF IDAHO, INC blowout & fill asphalt cracks at Kleiner Park 2,750.00 Date: 5/16/19 10:41:00 AM Page: 3Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 397 of 576 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund PAVEMENT SPECIALTIES OF IDAHO, INC blowout & fill asphalt cracks at Storey Park 2,750.00 01 General Fund PAVEMENT SPECIALTIES OF IDAHO, INC blowout & fill asphalt cracks at Tully Park 1,377.00 01 General Fund PDM DIVING, LLC Fuller Park clearwater pump intake install 650.00 01 General Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 220/repair breaker for dryer @ St. 2 23.81 01 General Fund PLUM UNIQUE EVENTS pay #1-coordination of Main Street Market 1,000.00 01 General Fund RICOH USA, INC RICOH MPC307 copies for 4/2019 Plan Review dept 57.10 01 General Fund RMT EQUIPMENT air filter & fuel filter for sprayer maintenance - qty 5 186.84 01 General Fund SCHEILA SABOURY MSB Volunteer Vests Qty.10 150.00 01 General Fund SHANNON LIND instructor fee - Gentle Movement Stretch 4/10-4/24/19 x 5 84.00 01 General Fund SIGNS, ETC Renew Graphics for Unit # 161 1,044.00 01 General Fund SILVER CREEK SUPPLY Pine Avenue controller expansion module to add trees x 1 224.31 01 General Fund SILVER CREEK SUPPLY pop-up sprinkler heads for general repairs at all parks x 50 391.15 01 General Fund SILVER CREEK SUPPLY Rainbird 1806 sprinkler heads for Fuller Park - qty 50 238.50 01 General Fund SOUTHERN IDAHO ELECTRIC MYB scoreboard wiring repairs 151.50 01 General Fund SPRAGUE CO, INC.220/ Pest control FSC 81.90 01 General Fund STUDIO A Playin' in the Plaza logo design 650.00 01 General Fund SUMMERWIND SKIPPERS INC jump ropes for 2019 Unplug & Be Outside - qty 100 300.00 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON cell phone screen protectors - qty 1 pk 13.84 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Misc Items for inspector vehicles 436.64 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON ruler/scales & 2 books for department 46.41 01 General Fund T-ZERS SHIRT SHOP MSAB Vests - Qty. 11, Screen Prep Qty.1 124.50 01 General Fund TATES RENTS (GENERAL OFFICE)mini skid loader for Storey Park pea gravel 4/30/19 238.00 01 General Fund TATES RENTS (GENERAL OFFICE)propane for forklift at Lanark Parks Shop 23.92 01 General Fund TATES RENTS (GENERAL OFFICE)sod cutter for Fuller Park ball fields 4/22-4/26/19 444.00 01 General Fund TATES RENTS (GENERAL OFFICE)sod cutter for Settlers Park 4/26/19 254.00 01 General Fund TATES RENTS (GENERAL OFFICE)sod cutter for turf restoration at Fuller Park 5/2/19 130.00 01 General Fund THE UPS STORE Ground Commercial Tracking# 1ZE786060355514462 16.24 01 General Fund THE UPS STORE Postage to mail Evidence to Lab 22.58 01 General Fund THE UPS STORE Postage to send Evidence to Lab 47.12 01 General Fund TOTAL SYSTEM SERVICES A/C Trouble Shooting & Repair at PD Admin 164.00 01 General Fund TOTAL SYSTEM SERVICES Troubleshoot & Repair A/C Unit @ PD Admin 164.00 01 General Fund TRACKERS CHOICE Registration: T.Marston & B.Albers Tracking Trailing Course 1,400.00 01 General Fund TREASURE VALLEY COFFEE Coffee, Tea, Hot Choc, Cream, Sugar, Cups & Cooler Rental 331.04 Date: 5/16/19 10:41:00 AM Page: 4Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 398 of 576 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund UNIFORMS 2 GEAR Credit for Attingers Speed Plate...returned-wrong size (100.80) 01 General Fund UNIFORMS 2 GEAR Credit for Lloyds Armor Speed Plate, Wrong Size (7.67) 01 General Fund UNIFORMS 2 GEAR New Hire Ballistic Vest for Ferronato 821.16 01 General Fund UNIFORMS 2 GEAR New Hire Ballistic Vest for Harris 720.36 01 General Fund UNIFORMS 2 GEAR New Hire Ballistic Vest for Overton 821.16 01 General Fund UNIFORMS 2 GEAR New Hire Gear - Attinger, Lloyd & Inventory 82.40 01 General Fund VICTORY GREENS sod for drain repairs at Keith Bird Legacy Park - qty 280 75.60 01 General Fund WESTERN STATES EQUIPMENT CO 19-0297 220/Backhoe Repair 10,953.52 01 General Fund XEROX CORPORATION - PASADENA BOW-588861 220/copier, April 2019 595.86 01 General Fund XEROX CORPORATION - PASADENA Xerox 7845 base 04/2019; click 3/20-4/22/19; MX4506016 495.29 Total 01 General Fund 218,277.89 07 Impact Fund KNIFE RIVER 19-0056 Pay 13 Discovery sitework,utilities,paving 4/30/19 13,024.97 Total 07 Impact Fund 13,024.97 20 Grant Fund governmental FRAMEWORK MEETINGS AND DESTINATIONS 4 registrations for NWCDI-2019-Arial,Campbell,Linan,Tabarini 550.00 Total 20 Grant Fund governmental 550.00 60 Enterprise Fund ADVANTAGE MACHINE & HYDRAULICS Well 33 Security Shelter as of 4/4/19 1,413.00 60 Enterprise Fund AIR FILTER SUPERSTORE WHOLESALE LLC HVAC standard pleated capacity filters (46 qty)164.58 60 Enterprise Fund AMERICAN LEAK DETECTION Leak Detection of Reuse Line at WRRF 325.00 60 Enterprise Fund AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION Registration B.Kerr PWX Conf, Seattle, WA 09/08/19-09/11/19 829.00 60 Enterprise Fund APSCO, INC.18-0344 WRRF Headworks Upgrades Bill as of 5/9/19 109,972.35 60 Enterprise Fund BOE - Boise Office Equipment Xerox Altalink C8045 Color MFP, Office Finisher 2000 Sheet w 7,178.00 60 Enterprise Fund BONNEVILLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY Safety flags for manholes at Bittercreek Lagoon (5 qty)22.50 60 Enterprise Fund BROWN & CALDWELL WRRF Capacity Expansion 2/22 to 3/28/19 44,580.43 Date: 5/16/19 10:41:00 AM Page: 5Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 399 of 576 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund BROWN & CALDWELL WRRF Facility Plan Update FY17 12/28/19 to 3/28/19 767.00 60 Enterprise Fund CASCADE FENCE COMPANY, INC.Repair Water Admin Bldg Gate & Post 350.00 60 Enterprise Fund CATHERINE SCHWANDT Refund:Wat/Sew/Trash; 4307 N. McKinley Park Ave.195.00 60 Enterprise Fund CHRISELDA GUERRERO Refund:Wat/Sew/Trash: 115 E. Moskee St.80.00 60 Enterprise Fund CORE & MAIN LP Water Meter Flange; Qty 1; WO#88888 10.83 60 Enterprise Fund CSS GROUP Translore License for Period 4/1/19-4/30/19 261.06 60 Enterprise Fund CUE'S Inc Labor & parts to repair CCTV Van 1 camera (2 hrs)1,119.98 60 Enterprise Fund CULVER COMPANY Leak Detection Dye Tablets; Qty 1000 213.48 60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY Seed Lawn Repair; Qty 2 33.98 60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY Small Bark for Landscaping Repair; Qty 6 31.74 60 Enterprise Fund DAINI CARLSON Refund:Wat/Sew/Trash: 2162 W. Pine Ave.29.82 60 Enterprise Fund ENERGY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION Labor & parts to repair pump 1 motor @ fermentation bldg 236.00 60 Enterprise Fund ERIC & LINDSAY HOWARD Refund:Wat/Sew/Trash; 5702 N. Claret Cup Way 69.96 60 Enterprise Fund ESTHER MONTGOMERY Refund:Wat/Sew/Trash; 1364 W. Willowbrook Ct.100.22 60 Enterprise Fund EXECUTRAIN OF IDAHO Registration for DPereria to attend Excel for Beginners 125.00 60 Enterprise Fund FASTENAL COMPANY ;WO#88888 278.00 60 Enterprise Fund FASTENAL COMPANY Nitrile Gloves; Qty 200 45.42 60 Enterprise Fund FASTENAL COMPANY Pumice Hand Sanitizer; Qty 2; WO#88888 48.19 60 Enterprise Fund FASTENAL COMPANY Rotary Hammer Bit, Wedge Anchors; Qty 51 34.28 60 Enterprise Fund FASTENAL COMPANY Washers for Water Meters; Qty 350; WO#88888 1,405.25 Date: 5/16/19 10:41:00 AM Page: 6Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 400 of 576 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Coupler, Meter Box; Qty 4; WO#88888 590.56 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Rental of fusion machine 200.00 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Valve Box Riser; Qty 12 171.52 60 Enterprise Fund FISHER SCIENTIFIC Termo couple & door switch (2 qty)570.47 60 Enterprise Fund GLORIA WOODWARD Refund:Wat/Sew/Trash; 3368 W. Kirkam Ln.150.00 60 Enterprise Fund HACH COMPANY 19-0013 Add UVAS to service contract through 9/30/19 1,313.00 60 Enterprise Fund HACH COMPANY Hand held meter for DO 929.51 60 Enterprise Fund HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS Tools for Eng measuring wheels and tape measures 27.96 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Paint filters (5 qty)4.15 60 Enterprise Fund I. KRUGER INC.2 inch SS BW header swivel connection 881.22 60 Enterprise Fund INTERMOUNTAIN DESIGN, INC End trim for Cubicle Wall 45.91 60 Enterprise Fund IRMINGER CONSTRUCTION 19-0296 Well 28 Water Treatment Const. Services 4/11-4/26/19 88,179.76 60 Enterprise Fund JASON BARBEE & STEPHANI FAIN Refund:Wat/Sew/Trash:2602 W. Park Stone Dr.65.00 60 Enterprise Fund JC CONSTRUCTORS INC Payapp 31 WRRF Capacity expansion constr svc as of 4/25/2019 836,706.55 60 Enterprise Fund JEREMY & ALYSSA POWELL Refund:Wat/Sew/Trash; 4647 N. Bright Angel Pl 59.58 60 Enterprise Fund JUB ENGINEERS Connection Fees through 3-2-19 1,000.00 60 Enterprise Fund KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES Bearing for rebuild of spare penn valley pump 89.18 60 Enterprise Fund KENDALL AUTO Keyless entry replacment key for Pretreatment truck 75.00 60 Enterprise Fund KNIFE RIVER Payapp 3 Gregory Lift station water/sewer as of 4/25/19 331,976.81 60 Enterprise Fund KORY & MELISSA SCORAN Refund:Wat/Sew/Trash: 4915 W. Astonte St.116.44 Date: 5/16/19 10:41:00 AM Page: 7Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 401 of 576 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund MICHAEL & SHAWNA BISHOP Refund:Wat/Sew/Trash; 2641 W. Divide Creek St.91.70 60 Enterprise Fund MIGUEL ESPINOLA Per Diem: Espinola, WEF Collection Sys Conf, Indianapolis,IN 196.00 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Adhesive to repair heat exhanger in mechancial bldg (3 qty) 52.35 60 Enterprise Fund MYFLEETCENTER.COM Oil Change, C15281 for Distribution; WO#255465 36.59 60 Enterprise Fund MYFLEETCENTER.COM Oil change, power steering flush & brake fluid flush C14002 193.57 60 Enterprise Fund NATHAN & MICHELLE SAGER Refund:Wat/Sew/Trash: 6048 N. Keaton Ave.191.28 60 Enterprise Fund O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Glass cleaner 7.99 60 Enterprise Fund O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Lok tight for shop (3 qty)29.97 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.plastic folder, ergo kybord(Krausch) and engineering scales 42.93 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Toner for Eng Printer Qty. 3 1,007.86 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Toner, batteries, 3-tier organizer, binders, cor. tape, pen 323.17 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Binder Desk Organizer; Qty 1 28.69 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Bulletin Board; Qty 1 41.42 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Copy Paper, Paper Clips, Label Maker Tape; Qty 6 160.00 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN File Folders, File Labels; Qty 3 79.20 60 Enterprise Fund OXARC, INC.Sodium Hypo Wells 19,27,20,25,30,14,22;WO#16122;Qty 2020gl 3,337.60 60 Enterprise Fund PATRICIA & DAVID RADTKE Refund:Wat/Sew/Trash; 3670 W. Sugar Creek Rd.39.32 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Cam-Lock Terminals for Victory Reservoir; Qty 10;WO#255453 366.70 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Compression lugs & shurtape (11 qty)76.62 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Fittings to add to IPS generator disconnect switch (6)227.64 Date: 5/16/19 10:41:00 AM Page: 8Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 402 of 576 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Light Bulbs for Water Admin Bldg; Qty 30; WO#255472 82.80 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Part to repair breaker in maintenance shop 91.55 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Parts to add IPS generator disconnect switch (230 qty)1,036.71 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Returned compression lugs (10 qty)(59.99) 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Returned inlet cover (185.03) 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Wire marking sleeve & electrical tape (3 qty)126.09 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY WRRF Centrate Modifications as of 4/30/19 44.11 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY WRRF Centrate Modifications as of 5/3/2019 1,197.24 60 Enterprise Fund POSTNET Backflow Final Letters, Batch 1038; Qty 220 52.75 60 Enterprise Fund POSTNET Backflow Reminder Letters, Batch 1040; Qty 4408 1,416.65 60 Enterprise Fund RED WING SHOES Refund on DDeighton's safety boots (8.50) 60 Enterprise Fund RED WING SHOES Safety boots for DDeighton 199.74 60 Enterprise Fund RED WING SHOES Steel Toed Boots for Distribution; Qty 1 200.00 60 Enterprise Fund REPUBLIC SERVICES - TRANSFER STATION Boisolid disposal for April 2019 24,583.20 60 Enterprise Fund RICHARD NELSON & ERIC MILLER Refund: Wat/Sew/Trash; 1042 N. Glamorgan 486.00 60 Enterprise Fund RICOH USA, INC B/W Copies; Qty 7271; Color Copies; Qty 1015; 4/1-4/30 110.37 60 Enterprise Fund RICOH USA, INC C86234082 b/w (966 qty) & color (1,300 qty) images 88.52 60 Enterprise Fund RICOH USA, INC C86236263 b/w (295 qty) & color (281 qty) images 19.84 60 Enterprise Fund RICOH USA, INC C86242095 b/w (957 qty) & color (834 qty) images 49.55 60 Enterprise Fund ROWENE HOUSE TRUST Refund:Wat/Sew/Trash: 1888 N. Iberis Ave.59.42 Date: 5/16/19 10:41:00 AM Page: 9Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 403 of 576 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund STATEFIRE DC SPECIALTIES, LLC Annual dry system sprinkler test & inspections for WRRF 175.00 60 Enterprise Fund STEPHEN & NANCY NEWMAN Refund:Wat/Sew/Trash:1942 W. Glade Creek St.37.26 60 Enterprise Fund STEVE & JOLEEN MADSEN Refund; Wat/Sew/Trash; 3651 E. Woodville Dr.800.00 60 Enterprise Fund SULLIVAN REBERGER 19-0011, Lobbying fees- APRIL 2019 4,000.00 60 Enterprise Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Canopy for PW Events 133.99 60 Enterprise Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Keyboard for RMurray 28.98 60 Enterprise Fund TELANSWER, INC Answering Service 172.10 60 Enterprise Fund THE BRYAN YAGER GROUP, LLC WDP Retreat Boise,04/22/19 - 16 Participants 2,064.00 60 Enterprise Fund TROY GROENE Refund:Wat/Sew/Trash:1126 E. Radiant Ridge Dr.77.78 60 Enterprise Fund USA BLUEBOOK Pressure Gauge; Qty 4 123.35 60 Enterprise Fund USA BLUEBOOK Tees, Nipples, Ball Valve, Caps, Coupleer, Bushing; Qty 43 634.74 60 Enterprise Fund VALENTINA LANDIS Refund:Wat/Sew/Trash; 619 W. Crestmont Cir 61.75 60 Enterprise Fund WW GRAINGER, INC Hose clamp 4.17 60 Enterprise Fund WW GRAINGER, INC HVAC filters & gaskets (16 qty)53.80 60 Enterprise Fund XEROX CORPORATION - PASADENA LX7658362 monthly copier lease for March 2019 163.52 Total 60 Enterprise Fund 1,477,724.75 Report Total 1,709,577.61 Date: 5/16/19 10:41:00 AM Page: 10Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 404 of 576 CjP/rEDAHO IDIZ IAN? - CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 9 Project File Name/Number: Item Title: Items Moved From Consent Agenda Meeting Notes: (�Q/rE IDIA*,----- NDAHO CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 10 A Project File Name/Number: Item Title: Ada County Highway District: Chip Seal Presentation Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 10.A . Presenter: Tim Nicholsen, AC HD Estimated Time for P resentation: 15 Minutes Title of I tem - Ada County Highway District: C hip S eal P resentation A C HD would like to explain the why, what and how of chip sealing as they will be doing quite a bit of it in Meridian this spring and summer. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate Chip Seal I nformation and Map C over Memo 5/16/2019 P resentation P resentation 5/16/2019 Map E xhibit 5/16/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate Community Development.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/6/2019 - 10:48 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 405 of 576 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 406 of 576 Our Mission: We drive quality transportation for all Ada County…Anytime, Anywhere! May 21, 2019 Tim Nicholson, P.E. Deputy Director of Maintenance Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 407 of 576 !"_$ ?Í P R E S I DENT DR L O C U S T G R O V E R D M C D E R M O T T R D OVERLAND RD LAMONT RD L I N D E R R D E A G L E R D EDNA ST EX ECUTIVE DR L O C U S T G R O V E R D M A I N S T L O C U S T G R O V E R D M C D E R M O T T R D M E R I D I A N R D CHERRY LN L I N D E R R D FAIRVIEW AVE PINE AVE B L A C K C A T R D C L O V E R D A L E R D F I V E M I L E R D T E N M I L E R D OVERLAND RD VICTORY RD FRANKLIN RD MCMILLAN RD USTICK RD Kingsley W a g m o r C r o s b y Jewell F i v e M i l e W o o d h o u s e F a y e t t e A l f a n i S h a r o n Redwick Blue Heron N e w l a n d C o rt o n a M o r r o w Fayette S i l v e r c i t y Tecate Modelo B o u l d e r C r e e k K B a r T Morrow S h i r d a l e S a n V i t o A l t o D r i f t w o o d Halstead F a r m i n g t o n B u c k b o a r d Balducci BalanceRock R i g g s S p r i n g M o r n i n g g a l e Bryson T a g i s h Algona S u m m e r t r e e Lupine 9 t h P a n a r o L a p i s S o n o m a B a l d u c c i Ringneck LeCoultre St Lukes T e r r i M u l d o o n H e r i t a g e P a r k Bayou Bar Pewter Falls K n o t t y P i n e Lakegrove O t t e r L e n a Mattawa Viso Elias S c r a n t o n Simsbury L o w r y L o d e r G r a y l i n g C o o l R i v e r K n a p p M u l d o o n S u m m e r p a r k C h e l m s f o r d HeritageWoods Cloverwood C r a n m e r S t r e a m S h a m r o c k G r e y l i n g Stream E d n a C h ate a u B e a r t o o t h Fernside Teano Pennfield Fifeshire F a w n r i d g e Sandlin LancelotMoorgate R o l l i n g H i l l KingArthur A n f i e l d Bower Coastal M o r n i n g S k y T r i d e n t P a t i m o s Ruffian S c h u m a n n Loggers Pass C h o p i n Badley B r i g h t A n g e l R o c k w o o d 3 r d N e w B r i d g e W o o d m o n t C h i m e r e Werner Pratt S c h u b e r t M a r b u r g W a v e HeritageView A f l e e t M a ll o r c a Prairiefire T h r e e L i n k s S a m s o n Goldenrod T o s c a n a A r o n m i n k G a n d e r Trail Blazer J a n i e B l a c k S a n d Gla cier B a y E d e l w e i s s A r c h e s E l m s t o n e A n d r o s Cranmer 2 n d PennStation 4 t h Dutch Farm S a w C r e e k P a n k r a t z A m b e r c r e e k I c e B e a r Lark S e a I s l a n d King Salmon S t a n d i n g T i m b e r C o o p e r B u l l o c k Sandalwood Gabrielle B l u e A s h RedMaple F i e l d st r e a m S p o o n b i l l Tagish M c F a d d e n W e b e r R a p i d s B l u e S p r i n g s Wilder Kalispell Badley Foxfire BrookTrout C r e s t l e y B o t t l e B r u s h Blue Tick S u n r i s e P a n k r a t z P e b b l e s t o n e D i x i e I n t e rl a c h e n Goldstone S u m m e r r i d g e H o l l a n d a l e A s c a i n o D i a m o n d C r e e k S h a m r o c k Susan Smoke Ranch T r o o n SageSprings S t o n e h e n g e L a u g h t o n S e d g e w i c k Wausau Wanda P e a k C l o u d C h a t t e r t o n D e v l i n W e l l s M u ir fi e l d L a k e s Rifleman Va l V i s t a P a r k C r e e k Rainbow Trout R i c h t e r R a l s t i n G l e n E l l y n Stallion Driftwood P e t e r s b u r g 3 r d G o l d e n r o d G l e n n f i e l d R o s a r i o Inglenook Q u a k e r R i d g e R o l l i n g H i l l s P h o e n i x S e d g e w i c k S h a m r o c k Applegate M u s k e t Malachite Pine Bluff S h e l l b r o o k C h a t e a u Meadowpine S i l v e r l e a f W o o d m o n t Drucker Wainwright OConner Jewell S a g u a r o H i l l s P h o e n i x G r a n d b u r g Tall Pine P e n r i t h G e d d e s F a y e t t e F o x b o r o O x b o w R o s e g l e n M a c h i n e B l o s s o m Greenleaf B o u l d e r C r e e k K y l e e Carolina W o o d m o n t Perugia Bollman C l i f f C r e e k K n o t t y T i m b e r Selway Rapids N i k k i R u s h m o r e S u n n y S i d e Bayeux N o r r i s t o w n P a n k r a t z E d n a Shortridge Peppercorn Gruber Station W e b b Gillette Oakcrest L o n g w i n g C r e s w e l l Griffon P i k e s v i l l e A y r s h i r e L a r k i n Tournament S t o n y f i e l d L e n a Christopher C i t r u s T i m b e r f a ll s C a t h y Florence Bollman T i t a n i u m G o l d e n r o d C e c i n a Criterion Mesa Ringneck Wildrose Thames Niemann H a l s t e a d M o s k e e F i d d l e R e b a J o u r n e y SnowGoose Pratt 1 3 t h B r a d d o c k G o s h e n Clarene Wildwood H o l l a n d a l e VanOker OMera N i c h o l e P a r k C r e e k Kingsford Chateau Vineyards Windswept Goldenbrook H e r i t a g e Broadleaf Chandler Shadybrook Territory Alliance A l e s t e r M o a b Waterbury S h a m r o c k T w i n E a g l e s B e e t h o v e n G u l l C o v e T u r n b e r r y B e a h a m E n g l e w o o d Central 1 3 t h Mackay Publisher T e n n y s o n 1 s t Clarene C o o l w a t e r L a w s o n i a Leslie R e d M a p l e 10th Kodiak Picard 10th C o n n e r S h a m r o c k L a u g h r i d g e Yucca Canyon Azure A d k i n s Tana Sagemoor P a r k C r e e k F l i n t s t o n e Meadowgrass Alicia W i n t h r o p L i z a s o M i d d l e m i s t C h a t t e r t o n Sydney Quaker Ridge Roaring Creek Greenhead D eer Crest Crosswind Claire Cobalt F l i n t s t o n e B u c k s t o n e B l u e w a t e r Riley J e w e l l A r l i s s Clover Meadows B u c k s t o n e S e l w a y F a ll s Loretta L e a t h e r Yosemite P a p a g o P a r k C r e e k H e r i t a g e V i e w Rochester M a r b u r g S p r i n g W a t e r Mackay Swift Water D e v l i n M a n O W a r N i b l i c k N e w s h a m A p p l e w o o d Gunsmoke Meadowgrass Peach Springs Persimmon Piedmont C h a n t i l l y R i d g e b u r y J u l i a S e q u o i a Cranberry Agnes C e n t r e p o i n t Los Flores Astonte W r a n g l e r G o l f v i e w Chateau A p p l e w o o d T y r a Burney Gl en Sunrise P u f f i n S c r i v n e r L o r n a S n o w G o o s e Tumble Creek L e w i s b u r g W h i t t i e r R u s h m o r e S t o l l e A m b e r c r e e k A l e s t e r Karluk River Rotan Davenport Thorn Creek Tana Lowry C l a r a M u l e D e e r P a l a z z o Q u e n z e r Flower Garden O l d S t o n e V a l a m Kristen B a y o u B a r Storey D a y b r e a k Race Montana Brandys Jew el E d n a C o u g a r C r e e k L e f o r s Waterbury Bourbon Comisky F r e e w a t e r Ruddy C o o l w a t e r Lo b e l ia H o o d R a n c h M o u n t H o o d P a r k C r o s s i n g Prairiefire G o l d e n r o d I n t e r l a c h e n Paint P a r k s t o n e Davenport Bird Wing S a g e S p r i n g s Moonlake D o ve r S w a i n s o n M a p l e s t o n e S e a C o v e R e b e c c a Mattawa 9 t h Loggers Pass T y l e e O u t p o s t K i s e r R e d C l o u d Hawk D u s t y G r i m e s C r e e k Janie P r i c e Windy Ridge Verona V i e w R i d g e 7 t h Brandywine Classic P e l i c a n S t a r r y N i g h t 1 3 t h Darrah 1 1 t h Avanti Silverbrook F l o r e n c e Blue Heron B r y c e C a n y o n N a o m i Irving E u r e k a 8 t h C r a n b e r r y T i p t o n Galvani CraterLake S u g ar C re e k F a n P a l m Fallen Leaf I n t e r l a c h e n Ar on m i n k S u n s et P oint Olds River C h a n c e r y G e d a l i o T r a i l B l a z e r S u m m e r w i n d El Gato B o t t i c e l l i A m a l i e Silver City Anton Viola Carlton Broadway Idaho Ginger Creek S t o n e M a r c h e Newland A l a s k a Goldstone 5 t h L a k e g r o v e S h i r e H i g h w o o d Eagle View C u r t W o l v e r i n e 5 t h Jasmine Pinyon F i e l d s t r e a m C o b a l t P o i n t MoonDipper D u r m a s t M o o n e y F a l l s P e n n y R o y a l Pebblestone E u r e k a 1 5 t h B e a h a m Wapoot Ir v i n g Washington Bodley D u a n e Maple W hit e C a p B urle y B r o k e n L i m b C r a t e r H e r i t a g e V i e w Silverking U p r i v e r D o v e R i d g e Milford F a r w e l l O a k s t o n e W o o d p i n e Hollandale 1 0 t h Leann Snyder White Hawk H a z e l t o n Pennwood M u s k e t W h i te Bi rc h P e p p e r b u s h Angelica 1 4 t h S a p p h i r e Shamrock J o u s t B u c k s t o n e P a m p a s B a n s t e a d Ch al l is Brandys Je w el M u s k e t Leroy K a n a k a Bunker C r e s w e ll Z i m s Y e l l o w P e a k Foliage Chateau Gatewood S i l v e r l e a f S a n t e e Ramsbrook Pintail M i r r o r C r e e k Antietam Ginger Creek Quintale T e s s a T r i c i a S u g a r C r e e k O C o n n e r G r e t c h e n Stallion Astonte M o r e l l o E l i s h a B r o o k s b u r g L e a t h e r P o r s c h e M i t c h u m M o u n t H o o d D r a f t L i n s t o c k Albany 9 t h V o y a g e r T r o x e l Quarterhorse Talamore Whitehall P e n n g r o v e T u b a c B a l t i m o r e R i c h t e r Santiago Kingswood D e e r C r e e k Van Oker Driftwood Blue Creek M c K i n l e y P a r k D y v e r To u r n a m e n t C o n l e y C l i f f C r e e k D a r r a h Tahiti F r o n t i e r Ebbtide A l p h a S p r i n g P a r k Astaire B a s s w o o d D u s t o d Gruber B e a m S c o n i P a l a t i n e H a ll e n b e c k M a r g e r i t h a Rosalyn C r e s t m o n t Pudu Wilder B e lli n a P e p p e r y R u s h m o r e B o n a n z a R o g u e R i v e r C h o c a y a Br oadleaf W i l k i n s C r e s t m o n t Abram Palm U p r i v e r C h e r r y C r e e k T e a r e H i g h w o o d 1 3 t h 1 0 t h S a n d h u r s t White Sands H a v e n C o v e Gemstone B e a r C l a w A d a l e Oli H e a r s t S t a m p e d e H a l o Beamer C o m i s o T u l l y C o v e Hickory 3 r d H e r i t a g e 1 0 t h W i l d c a t Crossridge Moskee H a v a s u F a l l s Foster Maddy G a r i b a l d i G u n s m o k e M o v a d o Leather O x w i c h Koetter S h a m r o c k C o v e r e d W a g o n TullySprings Tahiti Parkstone Ann Taylor Springdale Mercedes S n o wHo l e W i l l o w s i d e S p r i n g w o o d C a s a L o m a A t t l e b o r o B a r r a c u d a P e a c h l e a f Acarrera Indian Creek S a v i a Stanhope B a n s t e a d Ramrod McMurtrey RedGrass F a r w e l l C l e a r b r o o k T a h i t i C o a c h m a n B i g C r e e k Su nny Sl ope C h a n d r a ForestRidge Azure Jewell Picard T a n a g e r Armga A l e s t e r G r a n d R a p i d s A r o n m i n k Trutina R o p e r L a r c h m o n t El Rio Carlton Sweetbriar S h o v e l e r A s h l e e L e g a c y W o o d s J a n i e S h a m r o c k W h i t e s t o n eBrassie Jeffery Su m m e r h e i g ht s B u l l o c k Aspen Creek B r i d g e s t o n e Bowman Stonyfield N e p h r i t e G u n n e l l Washakie K i l e e Maple L o s t T r a i l I r o n C r e e k Beagle I n e z M a n s h i p M a s t i f f S h i r d a l e Z i o n P a r k C o u n t r y C o v e N a t o m a L o n g a b a u g h Peconic Expedition R e t r i e v e r P i n e B a r R i c h t e r C a r i s b r o o k e T y r a P e c o n i c Eider 1 4 t h L e n a Whitebud S a m s o n S u m m e r p a r k S e a g u l l B i n g M e n d e l s o n T r u s s L a u d e r h i l l L o n g f e l l o w Charles Archerfield M a r c h e W a r w i c k W h i t e h a l l E l e n a M a r i a D e s e r t b r e e z e T r u s s S y r a c u s e G l e n n f i e l d S c o t n e y Leonard J u s t i n E l i s h a S h e r y l Rochester R e d h e a d Turnberry Bowstring D e vlin P a l a t i n e G o l f v i e w E l m s t o n e G o l d B a r S a m s o n S w e e t w o o d Linstock R a v e n s w o o d H a v e n C o v e Addeson S a n d h u r s t B a n s t e a d R a di a l Crescent F a r w e l l Milliron Astonte CopperRidge T u r t l e C r e e k Leroy Tenuta O c e a n Astonte P i n e Summerplace M e a d o w l a n d W o o d g l e n Bear Springs Sunny Slope T i m a t h y L e i g h F i e l d Cougar Creek G r a n d C a n y o n D u a n e Bluefir Summerheights Verbena B o t t l e B r u s h B r o o k T r o u t H a l p i n Hartford P a r k d a l e SantaClara T o l l g a t e H o n e y w o o d C o b b l e f i e l d H e r i t a g e V i e w T a m m y B r y s o n R o c k c r e s s A b e r d e e n C e d a r C r e e k Florence S a n d h u r s t H i c k o r y T w i g Time Zone Cherrytree Hollandale Crossridge Springwood L a r k s p u r Waltman M a c o n C h i n a R a p i d s G l e nElly n H a r d i n g V e r a d o L i l y t u r f S h a r o nMorgan G r o v e Gondola D a u p h i n R u s t l e r Pride Crossing A l f a n i Verbena F a r a d a y N otel C re e k Los Flores L a u r e l Ada C o b b l e 1 4 t h Wildrose C a m a s C r e e k Astonte U p p a S p r i n g W a t e r s o n g L a w s o n i a H o o d R a n c h B e t u l a S l a t e C r e e k Whitespur R i v a R i d g e S t a n d i s h AnnTaylor Cougar ApgarCreek L e z a n a P a l l a d i a n Rainwater B r i x t o n M a h o g a n y Lava Falls B u c k b o a r d Grey Towers Peppermint Arbor L i l a c L a v e n d e r B i n g Fallingbranch S i l v e r a d o Hinsdale P r o u d C h r i s t i a n C o n g r e s s i o n a l Z i m r i BlueTick S p e a r f i s h Chemise N o l a Newport Woodhaven O r i o l e O x b o w Deer Cres t Challis G l e n n f i e l d Aspenstone N y b o r g B i s c a y n e P a r k Buchman San Remo Knightsbridge Shergar C r i b b e n s Southwind WhiteSands C a j u n Rainfall B r o o k i n g s S u m p t e r C o l u m b i n e Green Meadow 3 r d Kandice Ed m o n d s T h a m e s 1 1 t h M o r i a h K i l t T r a i l B l a z e r Cougar Creek B r a n d y s J e w e l Lochmeadow P o p p y Shellbrook H e a t h T u r n b e r r y T w i n R a p i d N y s tr o m W a l l i n g f o r d Albany Arch C r e s w e l l Forec as t Mackay H i n s d a l e C a p e C o d Florida F e n e s t r a B a r t l e t t R u n n i n g B r o o k D i x o n K a s t l e F a l l s R e d H i l l s C o m m o n A r b o r c r e s t C r i b b e n s D i x o n M a i d s t o n e Richey C h r i s t o p h e r Ravenhurst K a m a y Barnsdale Cherry Quintale La Pan T u r n b e r r y Carol M a u r a R e d H o r s e Zamora Stone Valley S u m m e rf i e ld W i l d G o o s e C o l f a x G o s h e n SalmonCreek Legarreta C a m a s R a d e r B u c k s t o n e T u m b l e w e e d Dawson D a m a s k D i x i e B a rr o n L i l y t u r f M a l a c h i t e Drucker R i p l e y Cave Bear M o r n i n g g a l e T r a q u a i r D o n a v a n E t t a T i p t o n Davenport C a m a s Meadow Wood C h e l m s f o r d T u s c a n C i t r u s C h a r i t a n H e r i t a g e V i e w Raja I n c l i n e MoonLake SilverCity O a k s t o n e C a m a s A l c o t t White Hawk 2 n d L a t t i c e C r e s w e l l Su m pter P a t i m o s S p o o n b i l l B u r g d o r f S t u c k e r D r a f t Silver City M u s c o v y W h i r l w i n d Greenleaf S a g e f i r e Sothesby A n d r o s S u m m e r c r e s t B a m b o o A p p i a M a r i a n n a L u s i t a n o T i r s o Wave D i x o n N e w b u r g h Quarterhorse B r i t t B e t u l a H i g a n Mesquite W o l v e r i n e Bowstring Florence G a v i o l a H i l l m o n t Foxtrotter D i x i e R utle d g e R h o d e s V i c t o r Y e ll o w P e a k T a l l g r a s s H e r i t a g e Flintlock Beechstone P r i c e D r a f t S u m m e r c r e s t S a g e f i r e C h e s a p e a k e R u s t i c O a k Sagemoor Anton Sharptail F r a n d o n G a l w a y W i s t e r i a C h o c a y a W a l l i n g f o r d Magic View Meadowdale C h a t t e r t o n Goldenbrook M a u r a R i c h t e r Sandalwood N y s t r o m L i l l y Breinholt MoonDipper G r e n a d i e r P u m a W i l d r o s e Piazza Kaibab Trail Rochester Richey Havasu Falls Bowstring A n s t o n M e a d o w l a n d Beamer Alliance 8 t h Meadowdale Tobago C o u n t r y T e r r a c e Scottsdale M o r n i n g S t a r Green Haven J i o v a n n i W o l v e r i n e P o r t a g e S u n f i e l d B a y o u B a r N y s t r o m M a x i e B a l l i n g e r Bowstring Apricot P a p a g o Aldershot R a v e n s c r o f t Bentley E u r e k a Gillette S t a t i o n GrandCanyon Horse Cr eek 1 s t P e n n y R o y a l S a n t a R o s a Jayton Sugar Creek C h u c k w a g o n 1 1 t h Q u e e n s G u a r d L a n c e r Newland Fieldstream Magic View Z i r c o n I n g l e n o o k Avilla H e rit a g e P a rk Meadowpine B l a c k C a n y o n A c c o l a d e Palm Redw ick C a t h y High D esert L o c h s a C a i r n s Chimere B r y s o n L o f t u s Freedom W a m p u m B i l b e r r y Shepherd Ridgeside L a t i t u d e W a g o n C r e e k S h o r t r i d g e S y r a c u s e Messina Parkbury L o c h n e s s G i n k g o A s h b y W e s t o n B o l i n a s W a r w i c k Albany Ste Lucia C r e s w e l l Bluecanyon PewterFalls Leslie Waldemar O r i o l e B l a c k s p u r Baldcypress B a l i Anton Paint Brown Trout M o n a c o Pinestone Hatch G o l f v i e w A b r u z z o P r o d u c e r P r e s i d e n t i a l Kendrick Tubac T i n a M a r i e P e n n y R o y a l A n s t o n S h e l l b r o o k P e s c a d o Stormy 5 t h P e a r t r e e K a y d e n P i n e B a r H i g h w o o d Silverking B l a k e l y Gillette S l a t o n A b r u z z o S h a m r o c k L e x u s C l a r a R o t a n F i f e s h i r e Saranac Q u a r r y s t o n e Race F arlig ht Lewisburg 1 5 t h I t h a c a L a p i s Waltman E n s e n a d a K B a r T S p o o n b i l l C r e s w e l l T y l e r s o n O x w i c h E c h o C a n y o n Emerson S w a n T h a i n S u m m e r s i d e Foxfire G r a y l i n g Elbridge P a y n t o n T r u c k e e R i d g e H a v e n Edna S p r i n g l a n d B l a c k s m i t h Stonebridge T a g is h Mastiff Tioga G r e e n w i c h Roosterfish D e v l i n S h o r t s t o p L a n c e r C a r a d o c Claire S t u c k e r D a t e P a l m C a s s i d y Ginger Creek C h a r i t a n B e t u l a S e q u o i a Flintlock Goldenbrook Chateau Quiet Peak L i m o u s i n e L o c h s a B i n g C a r m e l W e n t w o r t h B i r d i e A m e t h y s t Yo st H y d e Tumble Creek Tumble Creek A n f i e l d Ashton La Pan C r y s t a l C o v e S u m m e r b r o o k T a t t e n h a m H a v e n C o v e B r i g a d o o n Longford Crosswind S u m m i t K e n m e r e 1 1 t h M e n d e l s o n Christopher W i l l o w s i d e S c h u m a n n Anton Farlam B u l l o c k Powderhorn Tahiti T u p i z a B r y c e C a n y o n State Torrington Southerland D u v a l l C a n o n e r o C a b o Yosemite T i b u r o n S a p p h i r e La m b ert Te t e r Summercove T a h i t i S t r o n g h o l d Campfire A n g e l i c a R e d H i l l s James Court G i v e n s A s h P i n e T e m p e s t Ashby T o r i n o F o x R u n S i d u r i Wagon Pass Oakcrest C h a p a l a Apple Pine S p o r t s m a n I n l e t S t a r r y N i g h t Jayton A r u b a Claire S i l v e rCity R a w l i n s o n S i g n o r e l l o C h i m n e y P e a k E l s i n o r e HorseCreek B r o n t e Raja B l a c k s p u r D aly PowderRiver Washington Egurrola Yosemite W i l d G o o s e B o t t l e B r u s h M c G l i n c h e y Joust L a r k R o u g h S t o n e S a g u a r o H i l l s K u b i k Bowmont Pebblestone E l g i n W h i s p e r C o v e K u b i k L a n c e r Meadowrose Delmar Blueberry H i c k o r y M i r a n d a H o l l y m o u n t Aldershot L a P a n O t t e r Astonte B r y s o n O x b o w F r a n c i n e Ripley D o e C r e e k Willowbrook Peridot PondStone H i g h w a t e r Silverbrook F r a n d o n W eim ara n er V e n t u r e Newport 1 1 t h Brown Bear G r e n a d i e r M o r e l l o K i l l d a r e Dover T r i s t r a m Moog T r u n n e l Stillwater Davenport S i m m e n t a l E m p r e s s Tammy Fairborough W h it e b ir d C i t r u s Bodley P i n e F l a t s W hitebird L e z a n a M o r e l l o C o l u m b i n e S pringtim e HeritagePark R a i n y c r e e k E l s i n o r e H e n d e r s o n Woodbury W i n g a t e B o n s a i C h a p a l a T r u s s Edgar Bronte L a u g h r i d g e C a f f e r t y B u c k b o a r d Gemstone P i n e v i e w Pe g ra m C r e s t m o n t Peach Springs M a h o n e y Foxfire A m a l i e Los Flores Chateau Netherland F i f e s h i r e F a s t w a t e r Red Rock B u c k P a s s Greyling Legacy View Woodbridge Montana W e s t o n B a r a y a Fernleaf Albany Easy Jet Southerland Lowry B i t t e r f i e l d M o o n s t o n e W y m a n H i n s d a l e T u p i z a Stormy C o l o n i a l P a r k F a i r g l e n White Ash V i n e y a r d s C o o l R i v e r W i n d y R i d g e McPherson Peak Cloud F a i r g l e n S p o o n b i l l S p o o n b i l l G r e e n M e a d o w Silver City Hendricks W h i t e L i l y H i b e r n a t i o n S c r a n t o n Sharptail W e s t o n Tahiti Tagish F r i n g e t r e e Shellbrook C a p e c o d M a l a y a n Loyalty Heritage Park C o r n e l l L o n g a b a u g h Village Green Maple P e n n f i e l d W i c k h a m F e n B l u e w a t e r S l a t e C r e e k AndrewCreek H o p k i n s Hazelnut 1 0 t h C r o y d o n Blue Tick Star T h a m e s Summerfalls RedRock HeavyTimber L e z a n a Summerdawn Meadowdale Patel 1 1 t h S o l t e r r a IndianRocks Three Bars R o t a l d o Fir Creek L o d e s t o n e W a l e s Paint Piper H a w k i n s Sum merridge T i m b e r L a k e s S a g u a r o H i l l s Snyder L o n g a b a u g h McNealy C l o o n e y V i e w h i l l Apgar Creek Los Flores B a l t i c Kirkam BurntCreek 1 4 t h W e l l s Spanish Sun Tuweep P a m p a s Powder River MeadowCreek Locust View B a i l e y Tidewater R o t a n T r a v i s C l e a r b r o o k Ashford S o u t h e r l a n d M o n t e l i n o M o n t e l i n o S a n d l i n NorthGate Meadow Creek D i a m o n d C r e e k M u m b a r t o D i o m i Moon Dipper E u r e k a S t M a r t i n A b e r d e e n F ara d ay Grand Canyon Ramrod K u b i k Chrisfield Quintale Birdie R e dRoc k Kingswood S i m s b u r y Roaring Creek L a s h e r L y n h u r s t Woodchest Divide Creek Gander Peach Springs A l l e n Elm M o d e l F a r m Jalapeno O l y m p u s D y v e r L o c h m e a d o w B a y S t a r Tio Leo Hiawatha B e a r C l a w S t a r l i n g C a r i s b r o o k e N u o v a H i g h G r o v e T e s s a Janelle E t t a r o S o m m e r s b y Birdie A n n a t a Marylebone Crossbill State L e g a c y C o m m o n Jacksnipe P i n e F l a t s S h a r o n Monument K e a r n e y Wagon S e d g e w i c k H o o d R a n c h Halstead W e l l s M o r e l l o SnowCanyon B o l s e n a Windchime Ardyce R o s e p oin t T r a p p e r C o v e Tradition A s p e n C o v e L o c h n e s s Pebblestone H i c k o r y Mirmonte Biddick B o t t i c e l l i Z a c h a r y Torana S h a n g r i -L a C o o l R i v e r B r o o k m e a d o w B i g R o c k SheepCreek Cra n b e rry D i a n a S p a r k l i n g A n n a t a V i s o Lo c h m e a d o w Woodbury W e s t o n Washakie Trust Truth M u l e T r a i n 8 t h O a k H i l l s N i c h o l e Henrys Fork S p o o n b i l l L a b r a d o r S i l v e r s a g e Havasupai Pathfinder North Gate P o l a r B e a r Race G r i m e s C r e e k Delmar R u b y R a p i d s Geronimo J a n i e Ir ving 4 t h S e a g r a s s Gander B r e n d a N u o v a Eastbrook F i l l m o r e B o l s e n a S p o o n b i l l S a l m o n F a l l s G l a d e w a t e r N e i t h W i n t e rtr e e Redwick Brando DividePass D a y b r e a k Hunter D i a m o n d C r e e k D a y s i d e Milford Edna Spelman Piazza P a p a g o R e d s i d e B r i m l e y G o l d e n S p i k e A r r o w w o o d P a l l a d i a n A n n a t a S t a n f o r d Berni c e Poppy Lost River BelfastBay A n n a t a S u n f i e l d Chickadee 1 1 t h Roar ingCreek C i t r u s Ja m aic a P r i c e T o u c h m a r k N o l a W o o d f o r d Easy Jet G r e e n w i c h K u b i k W i l m a Idaho Comisky N y s t r o m K n a p p R i p t i d e Rochester Santiago P e n n a n t G a u d i a n s Bumblebee B e a r T r a c k M u l d o o n Z i o n P a r k Sto n e h e n g e Summerfalls H e a t h V a l l e y G r e e n R i c h t e r Broadway A p p i a Girdner Lochmeadow M a r n i t a Norristown L o l o P a s s O c e a n M u m b a r t o J u s t i n R i v a R i d g e D w o r s h a k S e c r e t a r i a t G e y s e r H i c k o r y K n o t J a g u a r Flor ida S a n d p i p e r B u s i n e s s p a r k H a l o Summerplace 1 s t O w l R i d g e B a s i n C r e e k Elden Gray S u m m e r t r e e LoggersPass B r e w s t e r C a m a s C r e e k Q u a r r y s t o n e T h r e e B a r s M e a d o w l a n d S u m m e r b r o o k M i r t h Picadilly Marlinwood Co rn e ll F l a m e H i g h w o o d O a k b r o o k M e r g a n z e r 3 r d W a t e r f a l l H e r i t a g e V i e w S a g e P o i n t G r a y l i n g Sh a rp t a i l H a v e n C o v e Snyder Maple Puffin Elm M o r e l l o A m a y a Borzoi E l s i n o r e Bl u e H o r i z o n A s h P i n e G o l f v i e w M o n a c o Cherry Hickory Dale C h a n d r a 3 r d C a t h e r i n e Three Bars Moose P a l a t i n e 4 t h Crosswind B e a h a m B a r b a r a S a m s o n King R a t h b o n e Wa g o nPass C r e st m o n t A l e x i s Perkins Bo Daniel Tracy B r o w n i n g L i n w o o d O t t e r J u n t u r a V e n a b l e Grizzly T i m b e r l i n e F a i r w o o d D a v i s Orso Y a n k e e Ann Railroad Moose Coleen Thomas P r o g r e s s GlenEllyn P a r k C r o s s i n g M c C o r m i c k Arlen Vanguard M o r n i n g S k y B a n s t e a d Scenery H e a t h 1 2 t h K n i g h t s b r i d g e C le a r C r e e k Lucerne C r i b b e n s P h o e n i x S u f f o l k W r e n B e t u l a Raincrest T y r a 2 n d Commercial 2 n d Joy 1 s t G w e n d o l i n e Gunsmith Pachino K i r k b r i d e I n d u s t r y Alden P o r t a g e Gala Arch Rock DividePass Willow Brook 7 t h Race S p l e n d o r V a l l i n C o n d a C l e a r b r o o k I b e r i s M a r b u r g Fiddler Tesino E d e l w e i s s W a l e s B l a n c a HeritagePark Y a k i m a Roxbury Redwall B r o o k f i e l d A r o n m i n k Archerfield W i s t e r i a AspenCreek L e n a N u o v a A r o n m i n k Waltman Monarch Sky Pack Conner H u d s p e t h 1 5 t h T a n g e n t S p a n g l e State W i l l o w s i d e M a x i e T u m b l e w e e d A n t h e m F i l l m o r e W h i t e w a t e r I n n o v a t i o n D u l c i n e a 1 2 t h Territory SummerDawn C o r m o r a n t Emerald Falls P r i n c i p l e Pegram O w l R i d g e K n a p p Addeson Woodpine T u m b l e w e e d San Remo M i r t h G l e n r o c k Verneal C a t h e r i n e Tourmaline G r e e n K n o l l View C h i m n e y P e a k Crescent Peconic Williams W i s t e r i a F a y e t t e B u f f a l o Monessen A m a y a M o n t r o s e F a u t h M a r n i t a Kirkam B r i g h t A n g e l Tioga Tana Sandhurst T r i s t r a m Divide Pass D a l l a n A m a y a Crest Wood D a w n V a l m e t S u n S h i m m e r P i n e C r e e k Bedrock C h i a n t i Irving M i r r o r C r e e k F u l l e r P a r k Hendricks Redwick Satterfield T o w n C r e e k M i l l e n n i u m L a n c e r Chimere Dworshak B a l l i n g e r SummerDawn Summerridge Quaker Ridge M a i l e R etriev er P a l m S c o t n e y A l d g a t e D o n a v a n High Rock D a s h w o o d S c h u b e r t B o r r e g o T i t a n i u m W o l f s b u r g Abernathy Meadowdale K e l s e y Greyling Muir Ridge Gra n dCanyon King 1 0 t h S u p a i Louisville 15th S i l v e rFalls Whitestone Garverdale W a r n e r Peacock M a r l o w Park Stone P u m a Commercial C h a n c e r y 6 t h Florence Ringneck Leigh Field C a u c u s Halpin C o n k l i n Hiawatha FinchCreek G l a c i e r B a y H e m i n g w a y S e a s o n al C re e k S p r i n g t i m e 1 3 t h C a l l a h a n A l d r i d g e Tenuta Bonita Canyon D e l R e y Peacock Audi Schiller Great Basin A r r o w w o o d Conway T r o o n Ringneck Welch A r c h e r y S i l v e r A s h M o o n l a k e Idaho Daphne P e nrith Broadleaf Wakely A c u r a V a l a m Yesternight C a m a s Bluelark S p i r e a Halstead Blueberry W a l e s Woodhaven Chandler F i f e s h i r e B r y c e C a n y o n Silverking B l u f f w o o d Staunton D e r r i n g Barrett Carlton F a r l i g h t Trafalger Pebblestone Wave P a t r i o t M a n O W a r H e i d i Stephanie Copper Point L i g h t n i n g Tanero T w e e d b r o o k J u s t i n C h i e f t a i n Chemise Clarinda S h i r e Puritan Z i l p h i a N i n e I r o n P i n t a i l W i s t e r i a Salerno N i e m a n n F i r e l i g h t S i m e r l y Niemann Ice Bear C r e e k s t o n e Excalibur PalaMesa G o l d F a l l s Pattie Corporate H e r i t a g e W o o d s B l u e S p r i n g s A t h e n a S c i o t o T i p t o n Thorn Creek Bearden P e t r a Borzoi Avanti WoodChip D a i s y H e a t h O x b o w La Hontan Audi Ardyce P a l a t i n e S i r o c c o L e s l i e A s p e n C o v e Spinosa B o t t l e B r u s h Clarinda Wave C o u g a r F o x R u n N e th e r l a n d I n n o v a t i o n R o s e p o i n t Woodington Sedgewick Satterfield O x b o w S a g e H e n E l k h o u n d W a r m C r e e k M a r y l e b o n e D i l l o n B o n a l l a c k O C o n n e r C i n n a m o n Gallahad P e n n f i e l d Highmont M o n t g o m e r y Roseglen S h a m r o c k San Remo B o n i t o K i l b e r r y T u p e l o Grouse P r i c e Eisenhower C o n s t a n t i n e S e n t i n e l B a l i Abram A d a l e C i t r u s E l m s t o n e O l i v e Mercedes Kimra Tida Florence Hanover Fulmer T a t t e n h a m R e c o r d s L a r k A l a s k a S w a i n s o n Secretariat Greiner C a r o l Heatherbrook Anton C e l e b r a t i o n Viola Summerplace F r i t t s Acorn S a m s o n M eridia n Nakano W e l l s p r i n g Hinsdale D u n h a m Meadow Wood M o ll y W h i s p e r C o v e Cobalt Thorn w ood T u m b l e w e e d L u s i t a n o E l s i n o r e Powderhorn G i r a s o l o F a r l a m S w a i n s o n M a n s h i p Blueberry F a r r o w J ers e y W eber R apids D e e p C r e e k B u c k s t o n e Peak Cloud O l d h a m BrownBear Fairwood Frontline Wapoot T r u n n e l L y n w o o d C l a r e n e D e n a l i Gray Cloud Torana Edgar Vestige Party Jet Sedgewick S h a r o n S a m s o n R o b i e C h a t t e r t o n Rutherford Abram S h e e p h o r n F a r w e l l G r a y C l o u d S o c k e y e T o r i n o Canyon Ranch Venture Driftwood H u mm i n g Bi r d Whitehall McMurtrey R i v e r D o w n s Lowry Daphne Hollandale Cool Pond Goldenrod Lake Creek G l a m o r g a n Borzoi 6 t h Blueberry T r u s s Lesina T o k a y 1 0 t h Ale xis L a n c e r Creekbury L a w s o n P o r t a g e Seville D i a m o n d C r e e k Marbeth C o l b o u r n e J a d e Bellagio Curt C h o c a y a S t e e l w o o d Sheryl Mirage C o v e y Riva Capri Stegerman C h r i s t i a n T i b u r o n T h a m e s Wells Pine Dominion L e g a l K i l b e r r y Cagney 1 2 t h C r o o k e d C r e e k G o l d B a r A s t a i r e C a n v a s b a c k T u r i n Farlam Horse Creek YuccaCanyon Ensenada Autumn Park Whitestone H a r v e s t e r F i f e s h i r e D r i f t w o o d Addeson L e g e n d Pinyon R i d g e b u r y C o o p e r M a n O W a r T y r a M a c k a y O l y m p u s Peck Joshua T a l l P i n e B r e e z e C r e e k W hipoorwill M a r s h W o o d Delmar C a l c i t e C o b b l e White Sands Wilson C l y d e s d a l e H i l l i s S p ri n g w o o d S h e e p h o r n Z i m s Janelle Carol Springwood J o s i e Creekbury W aggle Porsche Swindell 5 t h Senita Canyon Switchback O a k C r e e k C o v e y S c h u b e r t M o n t e l i n o Kingsley Painted Hills S u n S h i m m e r Comisky G r o o m Maestra Bowmont Sothesby Jacksnipe M a l a c h i t e B r o o k T r o u t Mesquite K n o t t y T i m b e r U m b r i a H i l l s S p r i n g V a l l e y Sonata Piazza C a b a l l a r Elgin S t o n e S t o k e s b e r r y J o r d a n e l l e Baldwin D a n i e l Ocelot V i n S a n t o Fig T a t t e n h a m S h a r p t a i l B e a r t o o t h Bonner Lonesome Dove Glen Ellyn T e d d y W o o d s a g e Bear Track M a p l e s t o n e Moon Lake Barden Tower C a n o n e r o H e a r t h S u p a i Lawndale M o r n i n g D e w S h r e v e p o r t King S ilv e rle a f P a r k C r o s s i n g Bunkerhill M o n a c o QuakerRidge Milano J e b l a r B u e n a V i s t a P o r t c h e s t e r C h a r l e s C r e e k S prin g B ar K e t c h u m D e l a n e y Havasu Falls Ardyce P e l i c a n Tenuta Moon Lake W inthro p C h a t t e r t o n B a s e n j i Sea Island Puffin C i n e m a M o r e l l o Lava Falls B l a i r m o r e P e n n f i e l d V i c t o r G u l l C o v e N o v a r a Marbeth S u m m e r s i d e 5 t h Elm Glasgow Grey Towers E l k C o v e A r c h e s W i n t h r o p Sandpiper Campfire A l v e y Colony Poppy Capriana R o c k b u r y M e a d o w l a n d A m a r o S u m m e r p a r k Cloverfield Storey Domingo H e n d r i c k s Gem Freedom F r e e w a t e r B u r l e y Silver Torch Spruce Creek Musket Observation S n o w G o o s e Hollandale Los Flores Silverview M adrid Yost Wind Drift Sonoma Castlewood Camellia P a m p a s Netherland R u s h m o r e Copper Ridge Palm C a s a L o m a Wildrose Peacock Garverdale L e a n n Great Basin Bedrock American Fork H i l l s 9 t h M i d n i g h t H a z e Green Canyon O x b o w S p a n g l e Ardyce Meadow Lark L i t t l e C r e e k C r o m w ell M a p l e s t o n e M o n t a u k Poppy T h o r n w o o d C o m b e s P a r k Judicial Observation Baldcypress P r e d o W o o d h a v e n G r e a t B a s i n Cranberry C a r i b o u Washington Autumn T a l l g r a s s Wainwright T r e v a Barrett Crescent B u r g d o r f B l a c k R o c k Marlinwood W a t e r l o o L a n c e r Barnsdale Bent Grass Fernleaf Clifto n S i l v e r S a l m o n Antilles G r a n d R a p i d s Chateau W a t e r l o o Wagon Pass W h i t e O a k B e t u l a Gunsmoke B r o w n i n g Central G r e e n b e l t G a l l a n t 4 t h P a r k C r o s s i n g Glen Ellyn Driftwood Maracay T u m b l e w e e d Vacheron P i s t o l C r e e k G r a n g e r Pattie Charitan Joshua A l y e s k a Esperanto Griffon WagonPass Gentry H e m i n g w a y Fortini C o l u m b i n e M i g u e l High Rock M c K i n l e y P a r k Lanark Claire Crescent 1 4 t h 1 5 t h C a l l a h a n T e r e s i t a C l o v e r w o o d Nazareth L a n c e r F e r n C r e e k C a l l a w a y T i m a t h y White Sands E n gle w o o d H i c k o r y W e a t h e r b y Granger Elm Creek 12th Gumwood T a n a g e r R o c k b u r y A s t a i r e 8 t h A f l e e t Hawk Emerald 1 0 t h Landmark G o l d e n e y e R e b e c c a Alzano H i l l s Lone Wolf M i d t o w n B o b c a t Aspen Cove C a li s t o g a A d k i n s Elias Abram Tahiti Ashby S c r i v n e r Country Squire Balance Rock Milclay S p r i n g t i m e Martinique Big Creek Delmar View Point T h o m a s Kristen T e c h M a r a c a y Arch P a r t r i d g e R y e g a t e Cory C o o l R i v e r L a b r a d or Washington Broadway W o o d s a g e R o s e p o i n t Wapoot P ri n c i p l e Ripley T e d d y Woodmont Whitelaw Bear Track B u c k b o a r d R h o d e s Marcon Baserri State Java J o y C a r v e r Patel McGlinchey L e g i s l a t i v e M a y f l o w e r Carlton N i s t l e r Lake Creek Price B i l t m o r e Los Altos Laughton C r o s s ti m b e r Parkstone C o n n e r M a p l e C r e e k G r o o m Hiawatha Peppermint Irving Louise G o l d s m i t h M a n s h i p V ic e n z a Aspen Creek B l a c k B e a r T o r i n o Patagonia R e d F e a t h e r 2 A n d A H a l f Kalispell Plumrose United Heritage B l u e M a r l i n Mountain Man Stardust Kelly Creek Estate R y e Velvet Falls Angelica Loon Creek Hinsdale Cloverbrook Onyx B l a n c a 3 r d H e r i t a g e I n d i a n C r e e k Pennwood B l a c k M a r l i n 1 2 t h M o n t e g o Elk Stream Griffon Trestle Blake River Valley Barbara Forecast W o r t h Annalee Lanark Selway Rapids Alejandro Ardyce B r o o k l y n Fireside Winslow Inglin S a n d e r s Kettle Creek D o b e r m a n Excalibur O a k s t o n e Gabrielle Excursion Quin Waldemar Kandice Village T r a d e w i n d Comisky G r e n a d i e r L i l l y C h e r r y B a r k Silverbrook Kingswood Glenloch E l i s h a Steeplechase Excalibur Silver Terrace Goldstone C a p e c o d Drummond 1 3 t h Pers i mmon R a i n b o w W a t e r s t o n e Quintale S c o t f i e l d Tapatio W e i r C r e e k H i g h w o o d A r m g a Wilde Creek Hearst Tiffany 1 0 t h P r i v a t e G i b s o n 1 2 t h S c h u b e r t W e s t o n M isty Higan Taylor B o n e fi s h T w e e d b r o o k Selway River S u m p t e r K i n g f i s h e r Torana Meadow Wood Doc Maple Copper Point I c e S p r i n g s S i l v e r t i p Milazzo Perkins Lake Creek Milano M u s t a n g W h i t e M o u n t a i n Clocktower S a n Re m o Sandalwood Kaibab Trail W e b b Divide Pass Katelyn Grassy Branch C o l u m b i n e S t a t i o n P e t t y Santa Clara S t a n w i c h Willard Scotfield P a t r i n a D u p o n t T u m b l e w e e d B r y s o n V i c t o r Greenhead Garber W i n g a t e Carlton Washington Whitehall M i r a c l e Hickory Tahiti A p r i c o t Keagan Brownfield M i d d l e b u r g K i n g s M i l l N o v a A b a c o A r c h e r f i e l d Mineral Wells Crowley Daniel Bismark Tidwell Ashburton Primeland S p a n i s h F o r k Claybourne P u t t e r Havasupai L l a m a S u n r i s e M a n o r M i l l w a y Tidewater Halstead St Kitts C o o l C r e e k C h a p m a n B e l l a g i o Fig V i l l e r e Observation Kostalota L e b l a n c OMera W i l d w o o d English M o d e l F a r m R e g e n t Peconic Sc otfiel d E s s e x E v e n i n g s i d e T e a r e Torana 1 0 t hWard Florida Fallingbranch Bird Dog 3 r d Alderstone O l s o n Doberman Promenade C o u g a r Mackay R o t h m a n s W a g g l e O a k R i p t i d e L a r k s p u r Meadow Wood Hearst Puffin Arch Park Stone Piazza Red Rock G r e e n f i e l d Blu e S p rin g s Merganzer Bridgetower G r a n d F o r k Lazy Diamond C Taylor Granadillo Airport S a t i n l e a f Cub Wittenburg Andrew Creek Dickens Santa Clara Gra n d Rapids Coleen Ashburton Spicewood M a r t i n g a l e T o u c h m a r k Musket Quintale L u x u r y Mayflower A v e s t Teter Tarpon Piazza Cadillac Fiddleleaf Waterbury P e n n S t a t i o n Les ina Cartridge J u s t i n Waltman N e l i s Loop Willowbrook Z i m m e r m a n Maracay Grenadier W h i t e P o i n t e Kodiak Lanark C a l d e r w o o d Monsanto Cranmer Wigle Palm Elk Bugle 5 t h Thoreau Commercial A r i e l Loon 1 3 t h O u t f i e l d Hickory Bark Lowry Forest Ridge Dallan Indian Rocks Gunsmoke B l u e C r e e k T o p a z Green Meadow Camellia S w e e t w o o d Antigua F i e l d s t o n e Lacewood Grapewood Creekview Crossland Honker W e e p i n g W i l l o w Tidewater S a n R a m o n Meadow Wood C h e c o l a Fastwater Linkershim Crest Wood D o m inic a Trinidad Harbor Point Tenderheart Navi gator View C a y m a n Irving Charolais Lewisburg Freedom Keates C r i b b e n s Cedarwood E d g e h i l l C r u s e r Baldcypress Egret R a d e r W a m p u m Tasa E l e v a t i o n Meada 7 t h K n a p p Paradise D i x i e C o p p e r P o i n t L e i s u r e Autumn Jordan Briarwood Stillwater C a m p t o n Sidewinder C o n t i n e n t a l Sunnydale B u c k b o a r d Ramblin Rose Hickory Loop Eggers R a c k h a m C obble Jewel F r e e w a y King Lynn Marlinwood Goldenrod 1 1 t h Rose Ramrod N o v a L a r k w o o d Tioga S anta Clara S i l v e r s t o n e C a n o n e r o Lewis And Clark Watertower Vaquero View S o u t h e r l a n d P i n e C o n e Becky Sunfish Valle Grande O l d T h o r n President Map#1 Map#2 Map#3 Map#4 Map#5 Map#6 Map#7 Map#8 Map#9 Map#11 Map#12 Map#13 Map#16 Map#10 Map#17 Map#18 Map#20 Map#21 Map#14 Map#15 Map#19 2019 CHIP SEAL MAPZONE 2-NORTH Private or Not Yet Accepted Road ITD Roadways ACHD Maintained Road Page Boundary Cloverdale Crew Adams Crew LEGEND 3/8" Chip 1/4" Chip Completed Projects Future Projects ± 1 in = 750 feet Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 408 of 576 ➢Why do we do it? ➢Chip Seal costs $0.22/SF vs. Mill & Overlay at $1.49/SF vs. Reconstruction at $7.39/SF Overlay Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 409 of 576 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 410 of 576 ➢Total Anticipated Cost: $7 million ➢Total Team Hours: 25,000 ➢2019 Planning Totals: ➢424 Lane Miles of Road ➢6,800 Tons Liquid Asphalt ➢47,200 Tons Aggregate Chips ➢45 Working Days Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 411 of 576 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 412 of 576 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 413 of 576 ➢January 1 –April 26, 2019 –Inspect/Test/Repair all Chip Seal Equipment ➢April 30, 2019 –ACSO Dispatch Presentation ➢May 1, 2019 –Chip Seal Postcards Mailed Out ➢May 9, 2019 –Shared Presentation and Information with Boise & Meridian PD ➢May 15, 2019 -Commission Overview ➢May 16, 2019 –2nd Meeting with Traffic/Permits/Capital to Discuss Upcoming Events and Traffic Considerations ➢May 21, 2019 –Meridian City Council Presentation Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 414 of 576 ➢May 28, 2019 –Refresher Training for Crews and Soft Start (weather permitting) ➢May 28, 2019 –Otta Seal South Cole Road and Chip Seal Eagle Island State Park ➢July 1-5, 2019 –No Chip Sealing for Holiday Week ➢August 31, 2019 –Estimated Completion ➢September 12, 2019 –Chip Seal Victory Party Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 415 of 576 ➢Post Cards Sent to Every Effected Residence ➢Daily Updates on ACHD Webpage ➢RITA & ASCO Dispatch Updated Weekly ➢Interactive Map ➢Social Media Posts Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 416 of 576 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 417 of 576 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 418 of 576 !"_$ ?Í P R E S IDENT DR L O C U S T G R O V E R D M C D E R M O T T R D OVERLAND RD LAMONT RD L I N D E R R D E A G L E R D EDNA ST EXECUTIVE DR L O C U S T G R O V E R D M A I N S T L O C U S T G R O V E R D M C D E R M O T T R D M E R I D I A N R D CHERRY LN L I N D E R R D FAIRVIEW AVE PINE AVE B L A C K C A T R D C L O V E R D A L E R D F I V E M I L E R D T E N M I L E R D OVERLAND RD VICTORY RD FRANKLIN RD MCMILLAN RD USTICK RD Kingsley W a g m o r C r o s b y Jewell F i v e M i l e W o o d h o u s e F a y e t t e A l f a n i S h a r o n Redwick Blue Heron N e w l a n d C o rt o n a M o r r o w Fayette S i l v e r c i t y Tecate Modelo B o u l d e r C r e e k K B a r T Morrow S h i r d a l e S a n V i t o A l t o D r i f t w o o d Halstead F a r m i n g t o n B u c k b o a r d Balducci BalanceRock R i g g s S p r i n g M o r n i n g g a l e Bryson T a g i s h Algona S u m m e r t r e e Lupine 9 t h P a n a r o L a p i s S o n o m a B a l d u c c i Ringneck LeCoultre St Lukes T e r r i M u l d o o n H e r i t a g e P a r k Bayou Bar Pewter Falls K n o t t y P i n e Lakegrove O t t e r L e n a Mattawa Viso Elias S c r a n t o n Simsbury Lowry L o d e r G r a y l i n g C o o l R i v e r K n a p p M u l d o o n S u m m e r p a r k C h e l m s f o r d HeritageWoods Cloverwood C r a n m e r S t r e a m S h a m r o c k G r e y l i n g Stream E d n a C h ate a u B e a r t o o t h Fernside Teano Pennfield Fifeshire F a w n ri d g e Sandlin LancelotMoorgate R o l l i n g H i l l KingArthur A n f i e l d Bower Coastal M o r n i n g S k y T r i d e n t P a t i m o s Ruffian S c h u m a n n Loggers Pass C h o p i n Badley B r i g h t A n g e l R o c k w o o d 3 r d N e w B r i d g e W o o d m o n t C h i m e r e Werner Pratt S c h u b e r t M a r b u r g W a v e HeritageView A f l e e t M a ll o r c a Prairiefire T h r e e L i n k s S a m s o n Goldenrod T o s c a n a A r o n m i n k G a n d e r Trail Blazer J a n i e B l a c k S a n d Glacier B ay E d e l w e i s s A r c h e s E l m s t o n e A n d r o s Cranmer 2 n d PennStation 4 t h Dutch Farm S a w C r e e k P a n k r a t z A m b e r c r e e k I c e B e a r Lark S e a I s l a n d King Salmon S t a n d i n g T i m b e r C o o p e r B u l l o c k Sandalwood Gabrielle B l u e A s h RedMaple Fie l dstream S p o o n b i l l Tagish M c F a d d e n W e b e r R a p i d s B l u e S p r i n g s Wilder Kalispell Badley Foxfire BrookTrout C r e s t l e y B o t t l e B r u s h Blue Tick S u n r i s e P a n k r a t z Pebbleston e D i x i e I n t e rl a c h e n Goldstone S u m m e r r i d g e H o l l a n d a l e A s c a i n o D i a m o n d C r e e k S h a m r o c k Susan Smoke Ranch T r o o n SageSprings S t o n e h e n g e L a u g h t o n S e d g e w i c k Wausau Wanda Pe a k C l o u d C h a t t e r t o n D e v l i n W e l l s M u irfi e l d L a k e s Rifleman Va l Vi s t a P a r k C r e e k Rainbow Trout R i c h t e r R a l s t i n Gl en Ellyn Stallion Driftwood P e t e r s b u r g 3 r d G o l d e n r o d G l e n n f i e l d R o s a r i o Inglenook Q u a k e r R i d g e R o l l i n g H i l l s P h o e n i x S e d g e w i c k S h a m r o c k Applegate M u s k e t Malachite Pine Bluff S h e l l b r o o k C h a t e a u Meadowpine S i l v e r l e a f W o o d m o n t Drucker Wainwright OConner Jewell S a g u a r o H i l l s P h o e n i x G r a n d b u r g Tall Pine P e n r i t h G e d d e s F a y e t t e F o x b o r o O x b o w Ro se g l en M a c h i n e B l o s s o m Greenleaf B o u l d e r C r e e k K y l e e Carolina W o o d m o n t Perugia Bollman C l i f f C r e e k K n o t t y T i m b e r Selway Rapids N i k k i R u s h m o r e S u n n y S i d e Bayeux N o r r i s t o w n P a n k r a t z E d n a Shortridge Peppercorn Gruber Station W e b b Gillette Oakcrest L o n g w i n g C r e s w e l l Griffon P i k e s v i l l e A y r s h i r e L a r k i n Tournament S t o n y f i e l d L e n a Christopher C i t r u s T i m b e r f a ll s C a t h y Florence Bollman T i t a n i u m G o l d e n r o d C e c i n a Criterion Mesa Ringneck Wildrose Thames Niemann H a l s t e a d M o s k e e F i d d l e R e b a J o u r n e y SnowGoose Pratt 1 3 t h B r a d d o c k G o s h e n Clarene Wildwood H o l l a n d a l e VanOker OMera N i c h o l e P a r k C r e e k Kingsford Chateau Vineyards Windswept Goldenbrook H e r i t a g e Broadleaf Chandler Shadybrook Territory Alliance A l e s t e r M o a b Waterbury S h a m r o c k T w i n E a g l e s B e e t h o v e n G u l l C o v e T u r n b e r r y B e a h a m E n g l e w o o d Central 1 3 t h Mackay Publisher T e n n y s o n 1 s t Clarene C o o l w a t e r L a w s o n i a Leslie R e d M a p l e 10th Kodiak Picard 10th C o n n e r S h a m r o c k L a u g h r i d g e Yucca Canyon Azure A d k i n s Tana Sagemoor P a r k C r e e k F l i n t s t o n e Meadowgrass Alicia W i n t h r o p L i z a s o M i d d l e m i s t C h a t t e r t o n Sydney Quaker Ridge Roaring Creek Greenhead Deer Crest Crosswind Claire Cobalt F l i n t s t o n e B u c k s t o n e B l u e w a t e r Riley J e w e l l A r l i s s Clover Meadows B u c k s t o n e S e l w a y F a lls Loretta L e a t h e r Yosemite P a p a g o P a r k C r e e k H e r i t a g e V i e w Rochester M a r b u r g S p r i n g W a t e r Mackay Swift Water D e v l i n M a n O W a r N i b l i c k N e w s h a m A p p l e w o o d Gunsmoke Meadowgrass Peach Springs Persimmon Piedmont C h a n t i l l y R i d g e b u r y J u l i a S e q u o i a Cranberry Agnes C e n t r e p o i n t Los Flores Astonte Wra n g ler G o l f v i e w Chateau A p p l e w o o d T y r a Burney Glen Sunrise P u f f i n S c r i v n e r L o r n a S n o w G o o s e Tumble Creek L e w i s b u r g W h i t t i e r R u s h m o r e S t o l l e A m b e r c r e e k A l e s t e r Karluk River Rotan Davenport Thorn Creek Tana Lowry C l a r a M u l e D e e r P a l a z z o Q u e n z e r Flower Garden O l d S t o n e V a l a m Kristen B a y o u B a r Storey D a y b r e a k Race Montana Brandys Jewel E d n a C o u g a r C r e e k L e f o r s Waterbury Bourbon Comisky F r e e w a t e r Ruddy C o o l w a t e r Lobelia H o o d R a n c h M o u n t H o o d P a r k C r o s s i n g Prairiefire G o l d e n r o d I n t e r l a c h e n Paint P a r k s t o n e Davenport Bird Wing S a g e S p r i n g s Moonlake D over S w a i n s o n M a p l e s t o n e S e a C o v e R e b e c c a Mattawa 9 t h Loggers Pass T y l e e O u t p o s t K i s e r R e d C l o u d Hawk D u s t y G r i m e s C r e e k Janie P r i c e Windy Ridge Verona Vi e w Ri d g e 7 t h Brandywine Classic P e l i c a n S t a r r y N i g h t 1 3 t h Darrah 1 1 t h Avanti Silverbrook F l o r e n c e Blue Heron B r y c e C a n y o n N a o m i Irving E u r e k a 8 t h C r a n b e r r y T i p t o n Galvani CraterLake S u g ar Cre e k F a n P a l m Fallen Leaf I n t e r l a c h e n Ar onmink S u n s et P oint Olds River C h a n c e r y G e d a l i o T r a i l B l a z e r S u m m e r w i n d El Gato B o t t i c e l l i A m a l ie Silver City Anton Viola Carlton Broadway Idaho Ginger Creek S t o n e M a r c h e Newland A l a s k a Goldstone 5 t h L a k e g r o v e S h i r e H i g h w o o d Eagle View C u r t W o l v e r i n e 5 t h Jasmine Pinyon F i e l d s t r e a m C o b a l t P o i n t MoonDipper D u r m a s t M o o n e y F a l l s P e n n y R o y a l Pebblestone E u r e k a 1 5 t h B e a h a m Wapoot Irving Washington Bodley D u a n e Maple W hite C a p B urle y B r o k e n L i m b C r a t e r H e r i t a g e V i e w Silverking U p r i v e r D o v e R i d g e Milford F a r w e l l O a k s t o n e W o o d p i n e Hollandale 1 0 t h Leann Snyder White Hawk H a z e l t o n Pennwood M u s k et Whi te Birch P e p p e r b u s h Angelica 1 4 t h S a p p h i r e Shamrock J o u s t B u c k s t o n e P a m p a s B a n s t e a d Challis Brandys Je w el M u s k e t Leroy K a n a k a Bunker C r e s w ell Z i m s Y e l l o w P e a k Foliage Chateau Gatewood S i l v e r l e a f S a n t e e Ramsbrook Pintail M i r r o r C r e e k Antietam Ginger Creek Quintale T e s s a T r i c i a S u g a r C r e e k O C o n n e r G r e t c h e n Stallion Astonte M o r e l l o E l i s h a B r o o k s b u r g L e a t h e r P o r s c h e M i t c h u m M o u n t H o o d D r a f t Li n stoc k Albany 9 t h V o y a g e r T r o x e l Quarterhorse Talamore Whitehall P e n n g r o v e T u b a c B a l t i m o r e R i c h t e r Santiago Kingswood D e e r C r e e k Van Oker Driftwood Blue Creek M c K i n l e y P a r k D y v e r Tournament C o n l e y C l i f f C r e e k D a r r a h Tahiti F r o n t i e r Ebbtide A l p h a S p r i n g P a r k Astaire B a s s w o o d D u s t o d Gruber B e a m S c o n i P a l a t i n e H a ll e n b e c k M a r g e r i t h a Rosalyn C r e s t m o n t Pudu Wilder B ellin a P e p p e r y R u s h m o r e B o n a n z a R o g u e R i v e r C h o c a y a Broadleaf W i l k i n s C r e s t m o n t Abram Palm U p r i v e r C h e r r y C r e e k T e a r e H i g h w o o d 1 3 t h 1 0 t h S a n d h u r s t White Sands H a v e n C o v e Gemstone B e a r C l a w A d a l e Oli H e a r s t S t a m p e d e H a l o Beamer C o m i s o T u l l y C o v e Hickory 3 r d H e r i t a g e 1 0 t h W i l d c a t Crossridge Moskee H a v a s u F a l l s Foster Maddy G a r i b a l d i G u n s m o k e M o v a d o Leather O x w i c h Koetter S h a m r o c k C o v e r e d W a g o n TullySprings Tahiti Parkstone Ann Taylor Springdale Mercedes S n o wHo l e W i l l o w s i d e S p r i n g w o o d C a s a L o m a A t t l e b o r o B a r r a c u d a P e a c h l e a f Acarrera Indian Creek S a v i a Stanhope B a n s t e a d Ramrod McMurtrey RedGrass F a r w e l l C l e a r b r o o k T a h i t i C o a c h m a n B i g C r e e k Sunny Slope C h a n d r a ForestRidge Azure Jewell Picard T a n a g e r Armga A l e s t e r Grand Rapids A r o n m i n k Trutina R o p e r L a r c h m o n t El Rio Carlton Sweetbriar S h o v e l e r A s h l e e L e g a c y W o o d s J a n i e S h a m r o c k W h i t e s t o n eBrassie Jeffery Summerhei ghts B u l l o c k Aspen Creek B r i d g e s t o n e Bowman Stonyfield N e p h r i t e G u n n e l l Washakie K i l e e Maple L o s t T r a i l I r o n C r e e k Beagle I n e z M a n s h i p M a s t i f f S h i r d a l e Z i o n P a r k C o u n t r y C o v e N a t o m a L o n g a b a u g h Peconic Expedition R e t r i e v e r P i n e B a r R i c h t e r C a r i s b r o o k e T y r a P e c o n i c Eider 1 4 t h L e n a Whitebud S a m s o n S u m m e r p a r k S e a g u l l B i n g M e n d e l s o n T r u s s L a u d e r h i l l L o n g f e l l o w Charles Archerfield M a r c h e W a r w i c k W h i t e h a l l E l e n a M a r i a D e s e r t b r e e z e T r u s s S y r a c u s e G l e n n f i e l d S c o t n e y Leonard J u s t i n E l i s h a Sheryl Rochester R e d h e a d Turnberry Bowstring D e vlin P a l a t i n e G o l f v i e w E l m s t o n e G o l d B a r S a m s o n S w e e t w o o d Linstock R a v e n s w o o d H a v e n C o v e Addeson S a n d h u r s t B a n s t e a d Radial Crescent F a r w e l l Milliron Astonte CopperRidge T u r t l e C r e e k Leroy Tenuta O c e a n Astonte Pi n e Summerplace M e a d o w l a n d W o o d g l e n Bear Springs Sunny Slope T i m a t h y L e i g h F i el d Cougar Creek G r a n d C a n yon D u a n e Bluefir Summerheights Verbena B o t t l e B r u s h B r o o k T r o u t H a l p i n Hartford P a r k d a l e SantaClara T o l l g a t e H o n e y w o o d C o b b l e f i e l d H e r i t a g e V i e w T a m m y B r y s o n R o c k c r e s s A b e r d e e n C e d a r C re e k Florence S a n d h u r s t H i c k o r y T w i g Time Zone Cherrytree Hollandale Crossridge Springwood L a r k s p u r Waltman M a c o n C h i n a R a p i d s G l e nElly n H a r d i n g V e r a d o L i l y t u r f S h a r o nMorgan G r o v e Gondola D a u p h i n R u s t l e r Pride Crossing A l f a n i Verbena F a r a d a y N otel C re e k Los Flores L a u r e l Ada C o b b l e 1 4 t h Wildrose C a m a s C r e e k Astonte U p p a S p r i n g W a t e r s o n g L a w s o n i a H o o d R a n c h B e t u l a S l a t e C r e e k Whitespur R i v a R i d g e S t a n d i s h AnnTaylor Cougar ApgarCreek L e z a n a P a l l a d i a n Rainwater B r i x t o n M a h o g a n y Lava Falls B u c k b o a r d Grey Towers Peppermint Arbor L i l a c L a v e n d e r B i n g Fallingbranch S i l v e r a d o Hinsdale P r o u d C h r i s t i a n C o ng r ess io n a l Z i m r i BlueTick S p e a r f i s h Chemise N o l a Newport Woodhaven O ri o l e O x b o w Deer Crest Challis G l e n n f i e l d Aspenstone N y b o r g B i s c a y n e P a r k Buchman San Remo Knightsbridge Shergar C r i b b e n s Southwind WhiteSands C a j u n Rainfall B r o o k i n g s S u m p t e r C o l u m b i n e Green Meadow 3 r d Kandice Edmonds T h a m e s 1 1 t h M o r i a h K i l t T r a i l B l a z e r Cougar Creek B r a n d y s J e w e l Lochmeadow P o p p y Shellbrook H e a t h T u r n b e r r y T w i n R a p i d N y str o m W a l l i n g f o r d Albany Arch C r e s w e l l Forecast Mackay H i n s d a l e C a p e C o d Florida Fe n e stra B a r t l e t t R u n n i n g B r o o k D i x o n K a s t l e F a l l s R e d H i l l s C o m m o n A r b o r c r e s t C r i b b e n s D i x o n M a i d s t o n e Richey C h r i s t o p h e r Ravenhurst K a m a y Barnsdale Cherry Quintale La Pan T u r n b e r r y Carol M a u r a R e d H o r s e Zamora Stone Valley Summerfield W i l d G o o s e C o l f a x G o s h e n SalmonCreek Legarreta C a m a s R a de r B u c k s t o n e T u m b l e w e e d Dawson D a m a s k D i x i e B a rr o n L i l y t u r f M a l a c h i t e Drucker R i p l e y Cave Bear M o r n i n g g a l e T r a q u a i r D o n a v a n E t t a T i p t o n Davenport C a m a s Meadow Wood C h e l m s f o r d T u s c a n C i t r u s C h ar it a n H e r i t a g e V i e w Raja I n c l i n e MoonLake SilverCity O a k s t o n e C a m a s Alcot t White Hawk 2 n d L a t t i c e C r e s w e l l Su m pter P a t i m o s S p o o n b i l l B u r g d o r f S t u c k e r D r a f t Silver City M u s c o v y W h i r l w i n d Greenleaf S a g e f i r e Sothesby A n d r o s S u m m e r c r e s t B a m b o o A p p i a M a r i a n n a L u s i t a n o T i r s o Wave D i x o n N e w b u r g h Quarterhorse B r i t t B e t u l a H i g a n Mesquite W o l v e r i n e Bowstring Florence G a v i o l a H i l l m o n t Foxtrotter D i x i e R utle d g e R h o d e s V i c t o r Y e ll o w P e a k T a l l g r a s s H e r i t a g e Flintlock Beechstone P r i c e D r a f t S u m m e r c r e s t S a g e f i r e C h e s a p e a k e R u s t i c O a k Sagemoor Anton Sharptail F r a n d o n G a l w a y W i s t e r i a C h o c a y a W a l l i n g f o r d Magic View Meadowdale C h a t t e r t o n Goldenbrook M a u r a R i c h t e r Sandalwood N y s t r o m L i l l y Breinholt MoonDipper G r e n a d i e r P u m a Wi l d r o s e Piazza Kaibab Trail Rochester Richey Havasu Falls Bowstring A n s t o n M e a d o w l a n d Beamer Alliance 8 t h Meadowdale Tobago C o u n t r y T e r r a c e Scottsdale M o r n i n g S t a r Green Haven J i o v a n n i W o l v e r i n e P o r t a g e S u n f i e l d B a y o u B a r N y s t r o m M a x i e B a l l i n g e r Bowstring Apricot P a p a g o Aldershot R a v e n s c r o f t Bentley E u r e k a Gillette S t a t i o n GrandCanyon Horse Creek 1 s t P e n n y R o y a l S a n t a R o s a Jayton Sugar Creek C h u c k w a g o n 1 1 t h Q u e e n s G u a r d L a n c e r Newland Fieldstream Magic View Z i r c o n I n g l e n o o k Avilla Heritage Park Meadowpine B l a c k C a n y o n A c c o l a d e Palm Redwick C a t h y High D esert L o c h s a C a i r n s Chimere B r y s o n L o f t u s Freedom W a m p u m B i l b e r r y Shepherd Ridgeside L a t i t u d e W a g o n C r e e k S h o r t r i d g e S y r a c u s e Messina Parkbury L o c h n e s s G i n k g o A s h b y W e s t o n B o l i n a s W a r w i c k Albany Ste Lucia C r e s w e l l Bluecanyon PewterFalls Leslie Waldemar O r i o l e B l a c k s p u r Baldcypress B a l i Anton Paint Brown Trout M o n a c o Pinestone Hatch G o l f v i e w A b r u z z o P r o d u c e r P r e s i d en t i a l Kendrick Tubac T i n a M a ri e P e n n y R o y a l A n s t o n Sh e l lbr ook P e s c a d o Stormy 5 t h P e a r t r e e K a y d e n P i n e B a r H i g h w o o d Silverking B l a k e l y Gillette S l a t o n A b r u z z o S h a m r o c k L e x u s C l a r a R o t a n F i f e s h i r e Saranac Q u a r r y s t o n e Race F arlight Lewisburg 1 5 t h I t h a c a L a p i s Waltman E n s e n ad a K Bar T S p o o n b i l l C r e s w e l l T y l e r s o n O x w i c h E c h o C a n y o n Emerson S w a n T h a i n S u m m e r s i d e Foxfire G r a y l i n g Elbridge P a y n t o n T r u c k e e R i d g e H a v e n Edna S p r i n g l a n d B l a c k s m i t h Stonebridge T a gis h Mastiff Tioga G r e e n w i c h Roosterfish D e v l i n S h o r t s t o p L a n c e r C a r a d o c Claire S t u c k e r D a t e P a l m C a s s i d y Ginger Creek C h a r i t a n B e t u l a S e q u o i a Flintlock Goldenbrook Chateau Quiet Peak L i m o u s i n e L o c h s a B i n g C a r m e l W e n t w o r t h B i r d i e A m e t h y s t Yost H y d e Tumble Creek Tumble Creek A n f i e l d Ashton La Pan C r y s t a l C o v e S u m m e r b r o o k T a t t e n h a m H a v e n C o v e B r i g a d o o n Longford Crosswind S u m m i t K e n m e r e 1 1 t h M e n d e l s o n Christopher W i l l o w s i d e S c h u m a n n Anton Farlam B u l l o c k Powderhorn Tahiti T u p i z a B r y c e C a n y o n State Torrington Southerland D u v a l l C a n o n e r o C a b o Yosemite T i b u r o n S a p p h i r e La m bert Tet e r Summercove Ta h i t i S t r o n g h o l d Campfire A n g e l i c a R e d H i l l s James Court G i v e n s A s h P i n e T e m p e s t Ashby T o r i n o F o x R u n S i d u r i Wagon Pass Oakcrest C h a p ala Apple Pine S p o r t s m a n I n l e t S t a r r y N i g h t Jayton A r u b a Claire S i l v e rCity R a w l i n s o n S i g n o r e l l o C h i m n e y P e a k E l s i n o r e HorseCreek B r o n t e Raja B l a c k s p u r D aly PowderRiver Washington Egurrola Yosemite W i l d G o o s e B o t t l e B r u s h Mc Gl i nc h e y Joust L a r k R o u g h S t o n e S a g u a r o H i l l s K u b i k Bowmont Pebblestone E l g i n W h i s p e r C o v e K u b i k L a n c e r Meadowrose Delmar Blueberry H i c k o r y M i r a n d a H o l l y m o u n t Aldershot L a P a n O t t e r Astonte B r y s o n O x b o w F r a n c i n e Ripley D o e C r e e k Willowbrook Peridot PondStone H ig h w a t e r Silverbrook F r a n d o n W eim araner V e n t u r e Newport 1 1 t h Brown Bear G r e n a d i e r M o r e l l o K i l l d a r e Dover T r i s t r a m Moog T r u n n e l Stillwater Davenport S i m m e n t a l E m p r e s s Tammy Fairborough W h it e bir d C i t r u s Bodley P i n e F l a t s W hitebird L e z a n a M o r e l l o C o l u m b i n e Springtim e HeritagePark R a i n y c r e e k E l s i n o r e H e n d e r s o n Woodbury W i n g a t e B o n s a i C h a p a l a T r u s s Edgar Bronte L a u g h r i d g e C a f f e r t y B u c k b o a r d Gemstone P i n e v i e w Pegram C r e s t m o n t Peach Springs M a h o n e y Foxfire A m a l i e Los Flores Chateau Netherland F i f e s h i r e F a s t w a t e r Red Rock B u c k P a s s Greyling Legacy View Woodbridge Montana W e s t o n B a r a y a Fernleaf Albany Easy Jet Southerland Lowry B i t t e r f i e l d M o o n s t o n e W y m a n H i n s d a l e T u p i z a Stormy C o l o n i a l P a r k F a i r g l e n White Ash V i n e y a r d s C o o l R i v e r W i n d y R i d g e McPherson Peak Cloud F a i r g l e n S p o o n b i l l S p o o n b i l l G r e e n M e a d o w Silver City Hendricks W h i t e L i l y H i b e r n a t i o n S c r a n t o n Sharptail W e s t o n Tahiti Tagish F r i n g e t r e e Shellbrook C a p e c o d M a l a y a n Loyalty Heritage Park C o r n e l l L o n g a b a u g h Village Green Maple P e n n f i e l d W i c k h a m F e n B l u e w a t e r S l a t e C r e e k AndrewCreek H o p k i n s Hazelnut 1 0 t h C r o y d o n Blue Tick Star T h a m e s Summerfalls RedRock HeavyTimber L e z a n a Summerdawn Meadowdale Patel 1 1 t h S o l t e r r a IndianRocks Three Bars R o t a l d o Fir Creek L o d e s t o n e W a l e s Paint Piper H a w k i n s Sum merridge T i m b e r L a k e s S a g u a r o H i l l s Snyder L o n g a b a u g h McNealy C l o o n e y V i e w h i l l Apgar Creek Los Flores B a l t i c Kirkam BurntCreek 1 4 t h W e l l s Spanish Sun Tuweep P a m p a s Powder River MeadowCreek Locust View B a i l e y Tidewater R o t a n T r a v i s C l e a r b r o o k Ashford S o u t h e r l a n d M o n t e l i n o M o n t e l i n o S a n d li n NorthGate Meadow Creek D i a m o n d C r e e k M u m b a r t o D i o m i Moon Dipper E u r e k a S t M a r t i n A b e r d e e n F araday Grand Canyon Ramrod K u b i k Chrisfield Quintale Birdie R e dRoc k Kingswood S i m s b u r y Roaring Creek L a s h e r L y n h u r s t Woodchest Divide Creek Gander Peach Springs A l l e n Elm M o d e l F a r m Jalapeno Ol ympus D y v e r L o c h m e a d o w B a y S t a r Tio Leo Hiawatha B e a r C l a w S t a r l i n g C a r i s b r o o k e N u o v a H i g h G r o v e T e s s a Janelle E t t a r o S o m m e r s b y Birdie A n n a t a Marylebone Crossbill State L e g a c y C o m m o n Jacksnipe P i n e F l a t s S h a r o n Monument K e a r n e y Wagon Sedgewick H o o d R a n c h Halstead W e l l s M o r e l l o SnowCanyon B o l s e n a Windchime Ardyce R o s e p oint T r a p p e r C o v e Tradition A s p e n C o v e L o c h n e s s Pebblestone H i c k o r y Mirmonte Biddick B o t t i c e l l i Z a c h a r y Torana S h a n g r i -L a C o o l R i v e r B r o o k m e a d o w B i g R o c k SheepCreek Cranberry D i a n a S p a r k l i n g A n n a t a V i s o Lochm ead ow Woodbury W e s t o n Washakie Trust Truth M u l e T r a i n 8 t h O a k H i l l s N i c h o l e Henrys Fork S p o o n b i l l L a b r a d o r S i l v e r s a g e Havasupai Pathfinder North Gate P o l a rBea r Race G r i m e s C r e e k Delmar R u b y R a p i d s Geronimo J a n i e Irving 4 t h S e a g r a s s Gander B r e n d a N u o v a Eastbrook F i l l m o r e B o l s e n a S p o o n b i l l S a l m o n F a l l s G l a d e w a t e r N e i t h W in t e rtr e e Redwick Brando DividePass D a y b r e a k Hunter D i a m o n d C r e e k D a y s i d e Milford Edna Spelman Piazza P a p a g o R e d s i d e B r i m l e y G o l d e n S p i k e A r r o w w o o d P a l l a d i a n A n n a t a S t a n f o r d Bernice Poppy Lost River BelfastBay A n n a t a S u n f i e l d Chickadee 1 1 t h RoaringCreek C i t r u s Ja m aica P r i c e T o u c h m a r k N o l a W o o d f o r d Easy Jet G r e e n w i c h K u b i k W i l m a Idaho Comisky N y s t r o m K n a p p R i p t i d e Rochester Santiago P e n n a n t G a u d i a n s Bumblebee Be a r T r a c k M u l d o o n Z i o n P a r k Sto n e h e n g e Summerfalls H e a t h V a l l e y G r e e n R i c h t e r Broadway A p p i a Girdner Lochmeadow M a r n i t a Norristown L o l o P a s s O c e a n M u m b a r t o J u s t i n R i v a R i d g e D w o r s h a k Se cret a r i a t G e y s e r H i c k o r y K n o t J a g u a r Florida S a n d p i p e r B u s i n e s s p a r k H a l o Summerplace 1 s t O w l R i d g e B a s i n C r e e k Elden Gray S u m m e r t r e e LoggersPass B r e w s t e r C a m a s C r e e k Q u a r r y s t o n e T h r e e B a r s M e a d o w l a n d S u m m e r b r o o k M i r t h Picadilly Marlinwood Cornell F l a m e H i g h w o o d O a k b r o o k Me r ga n z e r 3 r d W a t e r f a l l H e r i t a g e V i e w S a g e P o i n t G r a y l i n g Sharptail H a v e n C o v e Snyder Maple Puffin Elm M o r e l l o A m a y a Borzoi E l s i n o r e Bl ue Horizon A s h P in e G o l f v i e w M o n a c o Cherry Hickory Dale C h a n d r a 3 r d C a t h e r i n e Three Bars Moose P a l a t i n e 4 t h Crosswind B e a h a m B a r b a r a S a m s o n King R a t h b o n e WagonPass C r e st m o nt A l e x i s Perkins Bo Daniel Tracy B r o w n i n g L i n w o o d O t t e r J u n t u r a V e n a b l e Grizzly T i m b e r l i n e Fa i r w o o d D a v i s Orso Y a n k e e Ann Railroad Moose Coleen Thomas P r o g r e s s GlenEllyn P a r k C r o s s i n g M c C o r m i c k Arlen Vanguard M o r n i n g S k y B a n s t e a d Scenery H e a t h 1 2 t h Knight sb ri d g e C le ar C re e k Lucerne C r i b b e n s P h o e n i x S u f f o l k W r e n B e t u l a Raincrest T y r a 2 n d Commercial 2 n d Joy 1 s t G w e n d o l i n e Gunsmith Pachino K i r k b r i d e I n d u s t r y Alden P o r t a g e Gala Arch Rock DividePass Willow Brook 7 t h Race S p l e n d o r V a l l i n C o n d a C l e a r b r o o k I b e r i s M a r b u r g Fiddler Tesino E d e l w e i s s W a l e s B l a n c a HeritagePark Y a k i m a Roxbury Redwall B r o o k f i e l d A r o n m i n k Archerfield W i s t e r i a AspenCreek L e n a N u o v a A r o n m i n k Waltman Monarch Sky Pack Conner H u d s p e t h 1 5 t h T a n g e n t S p a n g l e State W i l l o w s i d e M a x i e T u m b l e w e e d A n t h e m F i l l m o r e W h i t e w a t e r I n n o v a t i o n D u l c i n e a 1 2 t h Territory SummerDawn C o r m o r a n t Emerald Falls P r i n c i p l e Pegram O w l R i d g e K n a p p Addeson Woodpine T u m b l e w e e d San Remo M i r t h G l e n r o c k Verneal C a t h e r i n e Tourmaline G r e e n K n o l l View C h i m n e y P e a k Crescent Peconic Williams W i s t e r i a F a y e t t e B u f f a l o Monessen A m a y a M o n t r o s e F a u t h M a r n i t a Kirkam B r i g h t A n g e l Tioga Tana Sandhurst T r i s t r a m Divide Pass D a l l a n A m a y a Crest Wood D a w n V a l m e t S u n S h i m m e r P i n e C r e e k Bedrock C h i a n t i Irving M i r r o r C r e e k F u l l e r P a r k Hendricks Redwick Satterfield T o w n C r e e k M i l l e n n i u m L a n c e r Chimere Dworshak B a l l i n g e r SummerDawn Summerridge Quaker Ridge M a i l e R etriever P a l m S c o t n e y A l d g a t e D o n a v a n High Rock D a s h w o o d S c h u b e r t B o r r e g o T i t a n i u m W o l f s b u r g Abernathy Meadowdale K e l s e y Greyling Muir Ridge GrandCanyon King 1 0 t h S u p a i Louisville 15th S i l v e rFalls Whitestone Garverdale W a r n e r Peacock M a r l o w Park Stone P u m a Commercial C h a n c e r y 6 t h Florence Ringneck Leigh Field C a ucu s Halpin C o n k l i n Hiawatha FinchCreek G l a c i e r B a y H e m i n g w a y S e a s o n al C re e k S p r i n g t i m e 1 3 t h C a l l a h a n A l d r i d g e Tenuta Bonita Canyon D e l R e y Peacock Audi Schiller Great Basin A r r o w w o o d Conway T r o o n Ringneck Welch A r c h e r y S i l v e r A s h M o o n l a k e Idaho Daphne P e nrith Broadleaf Wakely A c u r a V a l a m Yesternight C a m a s Bluelark S p i r e a Halstead Blueberry W a l e s Woodhaven Chandler F i f e s h i r e B r y c e C a n y o n Silverking B l u f f w o o d Staunton D e r r i n g Barrett Carlton F a r l i g h t Trafalger Pebblestone Wave P a t r i o t M a n O W a r H e i d i Stephanie Copper Point L i g h t n i n g Tanero T w e e d b r o o k J u s t i n C h i e f t a i n Chemise Clarinda S h i r e Puritan Z i l p h i a N i n e I r o n P i n t a i l W i s t e r i a Salerno N i e m a n n F i r e l i g h t S i m e r l y Niemann Ice Bear C r e e k s t o n e Excalibur PalaMesa G o l d F a l l s Pattie Corporate H e r i t a g e W o o d s B l u e S p r i n g s A t h e n a S c i o t o T i p t o n Thorn Creek Bearden P e t r a Borzoi Avanti WoodChip D a i s y H e a t h O x b o w La Hontan Audi Ardyce P a l a t i n e S i r o c c o L e s l i e A s p e n C o v e Spinosa B o t t l e B r u s h Clarinda Wave C o u g a r F o x R u n Neth e rla n d I n n o v a t i o n R o s e p o i n t Woodington Sedgewick Satterfield O x b o w S a g e H e n E l k h o u n d W a r m C r e e k M a r y l e b o n e D i l l o n B o n a l l a c k O C o n n e r C i n n a m o n Gallahad P e n n f i e l d Highmont M o n t g o m e r y Roseglen S h a m r o c k San Remo B o n i t o K i l b e r r y T u p e l o Grouse P r i c e Eisenhower C o n s t a n t i n e S e n t i n e l B a l i Abram A d a l e C i t r u s E l m s t o n e O l i v e Mercedes Kimra Tida Florence Hanover Fulmer T a t t e n h a m R e c o r d s L a r k A l a s k a S w a i n s o n Secretariat Greiner C a r o l Heatherbrook Anton C e l e b r a t i o n Viola Summerplace F r i t t s Acorn S a m s o n M eridian Nakano W e l l s p r i n g Hinsdale D u n h a m Meadow Wood M o ll y W h i s p e r C o v e Cobalt Thornwood T u m b l e w e e d L u s i t a n o E l s i n o r e Powderhorn G i r a s o l o Farlam S w a i n s o n M a n s h i p Blueberry F a r r o w Jers ey W eber Rapids D e e p C r e e k B u c k s t o n e Peak Cloud O l d h a m BrownBear Fairwood Frontline Wapoot T r u n n e l L y n w o o d Clarene D e n a l i Gray Cloud Torana Edgar Vestige Party Jet Sedgewick S h a r o n S a m s o n R o b i e C h a t t e r t o n Rutherford Abram S h e e p h o r n F a r w e l l G r a y C l o u d S o c k e y e T o r i n o Canyon Ranch Venture Driftwood Humming Bird Whitehall McMurtrey R i v e r D o w n s Lowry Daphne Hollandale Cool Pond Goldenrod Lake Creek G l a m o r g a n Borzoi 6 t h Blueberry T r u s s Lesina T o k a y 1 0 t h Alexis L a n c e r Creekbury L a w s o n P o r t a g e Seville D i a m o n d C r e e k Marbeth C o l b o u r n e J a d e Bellagio Curt C h oca ya S t e e l w o o d Sheryl Mirage C o v e y Riva Capri Stegerman C h r i s t i a n T i b u r o n T h a m e s Wells Pine Dominion L e g a l K i l b e r r y Cagney 1 2 t h C r o o k e d C r e e k G o l d B a r A s t a i r e C a n v a s b a c k T uri n Farlam Horse Creek YuccaCanyon Ensenada Autumn Park Whitestone H a r v e s t e r F i f e s h i r e Dri f t w o o d Addeson L e g e n d Pinyon R i d g e b u r y C o o p e r M a n O W a r T y r a M a c k a y O l y m p u s Peck Joshua T a l l P i n e B r e e z e C r e e k W hipoorwill M a r s h W o o d Delmar C alc i te C o b b l e White Sands Wilson C l y d e s d a l e H il li s Springwood S h e e p h o r n Z i m s Janelle Carol Springwood J o s i e Creekbury W aggle Porsche Swindell 5 t h Senita Canyon Switchback O a k C r e e k C o v e y S c h u b e r t M o n t e l i n o Kingsley Painted Hills S u n S h i m m e r Comisky G r o o m Maestra Bowmont Sothesby Jacksnipe M a l a c h i t e B r o o k T r o u t Mesquite K n o t t y T i m b e r U m b r i a H i l l s S p r i n g V a l l e y Sonata Piazza C a b a l l a r Elgin S t o n e S t o k e s b e r r y J o r d a n e l l e Baldwin D a n i e l Ocelot V i n S a n t o Fig T a t t e n h a m S h a r p t a i l B e a r t o o t h Bonner Lonesome Dove Glen Ellyn T e d d y W o o d s a g e Bear Track M a p l e s t o n e Moon Lake Barden Tower C a n o n e r o H e a r t h S u p a i Lawndale M o r n i n g D e w S h r e v e p o r t King Silv e rle af P a r k C r o s s i n g Bunkerhill M o n a c o QuakerRidge Milano J e b l a r B u e n a V i s t a P o r t c h e s t e r C h a r l e s C r e e k S prin g B ar K e t c h u m D e l a n e y Havasu Falls Ardyce P e l i c a n Tenuta Moon Lake W inthro p C h a t t e r t o n B a s e n j i Sea Island Puffin C i n e m a M o r e l l o Lava Falls B l a i r m o r e P e n n f i e l d V i c t o r G u l l C o v e N o v a r a Marbeth S u m m e r s i d e 5 t h Elm Glasgow Grey Towers E l k C o v e A r c h e s W i n t h r o p Sandpiper Campfire A l v e y Colony Poppy Capriana R o c k b u r y M e a d o w l a n d A m a r o S u m m e r p a r k Cloverfield Storey Domingo He ndr ic ks Gem Freedom F r e e w a t e r B u r l e y Silver Torch Spruce Creek Musket Observation S n o w G o o s e Hollandale Los Flores Silverview M adrid Yost Wind Drift Sonoma Castlewood Camellia P a m p a s Netherland R u s h m o r e Copper Ridge Palm C a s a L o m a Wildrose Peacock Garverdale L e a n n Great Basin Bedrock American Fork H i l l s 9 t h M i d n i g h t H a z e Green Canyon O x b o w S p a n g l e Ardyce Meadow Lark L i t t l e C r e e k C ro m w ell M a p l e s t o n e M o n t a u k Poppy T h o r n w o o d C o m b e s P a r k Judicial Observation Baldcypress P r e d o W o o d h a v e n G r e a t B a s i n Cranberry C a r i b o u Washington Autumn T a l l g r a s s Wainwright T r e v a Barrett Crescent B u r g d o r f B l a c k R o c k Marlinwood W a t e r l o o L a n c e r Barnsdale Bent Grass Fernleaf Clifton Si l v e r S a lm o n Antilles G r a n d Ra p i d s Chateau W a t e r l o o Wagon Pass W h i t e O a k B e t u l a Gunsmoke B r o w n i n g Central G r e e n b e l t G a l l a n t 4 t h P a r k C r o s s i n g Glen Ellyn Driftwood Maracay T u m b l e w e e d Vacheron P i s t o l C r e e k G r a n g e r Pattie Charitan Joshua A l y e s k a Esperanto Griffon WagonPass Gentry H e m i n g w a y Fortini C o l u m b i n e M i g u e l High Rock M c K i n l e y P a r k Lanark Claire Crescent 1 4 t h 1 5 t h C a l l a h a n T e r e s i t a C lo v erwood Nazareth L a n c e r F e r n C r e e k C a l l a w a y T i m a t h y White Sands E n gle w o o d H i c k o r y W e a t h e r b y Granger Elm Creek 12th Gumwood T a n a g e r R o c k b u r y A s t a i r e 8 t h A f l e e t Hawk Emerald 1 0 t h Landmark G o l d e n e y e R e b e c c a Alzano H i l l s Lone Wolf M i d t o w n B o b c a t Aspen Cove C a li s t o g a A d k i n s Elias Abram Tahiti Ashby S c r i v n e r Country Squire Balance Rock Milclay S p r i n g t i m e Martinique Big Creek Delmar View Point T h o m a s Kristen T e c h Ma r a ca y Arch P a r t r i d g e R y e g a t e Cory C o o l R i v e r L a br a d or Washington Broadway W o o d s a g e R o s e p o i n t Wapoot P rin cipl e Ripley T e d d y Woodmont Whitelaw Bear Track B u c k b o a r d R h o d e s Marcon Baserri State Java J o y C a r v e r Patel McGlinchey L e g i s l a t i v e M a y f l o w e r Carlton N i s t l e r Lake Creek Price B i l t m o r e Los Altos Laughton C r o s s ti m b e r Parkstone C o n n e r M a p l e C r e e k G r o o m Hiawatha Peppermint Irving Louise G o l d s m i t h M a n s h i p Vic e n z a Aspen Creek B l a c k B e a r T o r i n o Patagonia R e d F e a t h e r 2 A n d A H a l f Kalispell Plumrose United Heritage B l u e M a r l i n Mountain Man Stardust Kelly Creek Estate R y e Velvet Falls Angelica Loon Creek Hinsdale Cloverbrook Onyx B l a n c a 3 r d H e r i t a g e I n d i a n C r e e k Pennwood B l a c k M a r l i n 1 2 t h M o n t e g o Elk Stream Griffon Trestle Blake River Valley Barbara Forecast W o r t h Annalee Lanark Selway Rapids Alejandro Ardyce B r o o k l y n Fireside Winslow Inglin S a n d e r s Kettle Creek D o b e r m a n Excalibur O a k s t o n e Gabrielle Excursion Quin Waldemar Kandice Village T r a d e w i n d Comisky G r e n a d i e r L i l l y C h e r r y B a r k Silverbrook Kingswood Glenloch E l i s h a Steeplechase Excalibur Silver Terrace Goldstone C a p e c o d Drummond 1 3 t h Persimmon R a i n b o w W a t e r s t o n e Quintale S c o tf ield Tapatio W e i r C r e e k H i g h w o o d Armga Wilde Creek Hearst Tiffany 1 0 t h P r i v a t e G i b s o n 1 2 t h S c h u b e r t W e s t o n M isty Higan Taylor B o n e fis h T w e e d b r o o k Selway River S u m p t e r K i n g f i s h e r Torana Meadow Wood Doc Maple Copper Point I c e S p r i n g s S i l v e r t i p Milazzo Perkins Lake Creek Milano M u s t a n g W h i t e M o u n t a i n Clocktower Sa n Remo Sandalwood Kaibab Trail W e b b Divide Pass Katelyn Grassy Branch C o l u m b i n e S t a t i o n P e t t y Santa Clara St a n w i c h Willard Scotfield Pa t r i n a D u p o n t T u m b l e w e e d B r y s o n V i c t o r Greenhead Garber W i n g a t e Carlton Washington Whitehall M i r a c l e Hickory Tahiti Apric o t Keagan Brownfield M i d d l e b u r g K i n g s M i l l N o v a A b a c o A r c h e r f i e l d Mineral Wells Crowley Daniel Bismark Tidwell Ashburton Primeland S p a n i s h F o r k Claybourne P u t t e r Havasupai L l a m a S u n r i s e M a n o r M i l l w a y Tidewater Halstead St Kitts C o o l C r e e k C h a p m a n Bella g i o Fig V i l l e r e Observation Kostalota L e b l a n c OMera W i l d w o o d English M o d e l F a r m R e g e n t Peconic Scotfield E s s e x E v e n i n g s i d e T e a r e Torana 1 0 t hWard Florida Fallingbranch Bird Dog 3 r d Alderstone O l s o n Doberman Promenade C o u g a r Mackay R o t h m a n s W a g g l e O a k R i p t i d e L a r k s p u r Meadow Wood Hearst Puffin Arch Park Stone Piazza Red Rock G r e e n f i e l d Blu e S prin g s Merganzer Bridgetower G r a n d F o r k Lazy Diamond C Taylor Granadillo Airport S a t i n l e a f Cub Wittenburg Andrew Creek Dickens Santa Clara Grand Rapids Coleen Ashburton Spicewood M a r t i n g a l e T o u c h m a r k Musket Quintale L u x u r y Mayflower A v e s t Teter Tarpon Piazza Cadillac Fiddleleaf Waterbury P e n n S t a t i o n Lesina Cartridge J u s t i n Waltman N e l i s Loop Willowbrook Z i m m e r m a n Maracay Grenadier W h i t e P o i n t e Kodiak Lanark Cald e rw o o d Monsanto Cranmer Wigle Palm Elk Bugle 5 t h Thoreau Commercial A r i e l Loon 1 3 t h O u t f i e l d Hickory Bark Lowry Forest Ridge Dallan Indian Rocks Gunsmoke B l u e C r e e k T o p a z Green Meadow Camellia S w e e t w o o d Antigua F i e l d s t o n e Lacewood Grapewood Creekview Crossland Honker W e e p i n g W i l l o w Tidewater S a n R a m o n Meadow Wood C h e c o l a Fastwater Linkershim Crest Wood D o m inic a Trinidad Harbor Point Tenderheart Navigator View C ay m a n Irving Charolais Lewisburg Freedom Keates C r i b b e n s Cedarwood Edge h i l l Cruser Baldcypress Egret R a de r W a m p u m Tasa E l e v a t i o n Meada 7 t h K n a p p Paradise D i x i e C o p p e r P o i n t L e i s u r e Autumn Jordan Briarwood Stillwater C a m p t o n Sidewinder C o n t i n e n t a l Sunnydale B u c k b o a r d Ramblin Rose Hickory Loop Eggers R a c k h a m C obble Jewel F r e e w a y King Lynn Marlinwood Goldenrod 1 1 t h Rose Ramrod N o v a L a r k w o o d Tioga Santa Clara S i l v e r s t o n e C a n o n e r o Lewis And Clark Watertower Vaquero View S o u t h e r l a n d P i n e C o n e Becky Sunfish Valle Grande O l d T h o r n President Map#1 Map#2 Map#3 Map#4 Map#5 Map#6 Map#7 Map#8 Map#9 Map#11 Map#12 Map#13 Map#16 Map#10 Map#17 Map#18 Map#20 Map#21 Map#14 Map#15 Map#19 2019 CHIP SEAL MAPZONE 2-NORTH Private or Not Yet Accepted Road ITD Roadways ACHD Maintained Road Page Boundary Cloverdale Crew Adams Crew LEGEND 3/8" Chip 1/4" Chip Completed Projects Future Projects ± 1 in = 750 feet Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 419 of 576 �jQ/rE IDIZ IAN,?-- �J CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 11 A Project File Name/Number: Item Title: Meridian Dairy and Stock Show Request Meeting Notes: For Cost Share for Annual Dairy Days Parade I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 11.A . Presenter: Hans Bruijn Estimated Time for P resentation: 10 minutes Title of I tem - M eridian D airy and S tock Show Request for C ost S hare for Annual Dairy D ays Parade T his is an annual ask from the Dairy Board f or the C ity to cover the cost of the S pecialty C onstruction traf f ic control services f or the parade. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate Memo to Council C over Memo 5/16/2019 S pecialty C onstruction Q uote B ackup Material 5/16/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/16/2019 - 10:36 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 420 of 576 City Attorney’s Office 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite #306 Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-898-5506 www.meridiancity.org MEMORANDUM DATE: May 16, 2019 TO: Bill Nary, City Attorney FROM: Emily Kane, Deputy City Attorney RE: History of City’s Role in Dairy Days I. HISTORIC MERIDIAN S PECIAL EVENT ORDINANCE In 2014, by the adoption of Ordinance no. 14-1611, City Council added these provisions to Title 3, Chapter 4, Meridian City Code: • CITY SERVICES: Services provided by City employees in the course and scope of their employment for the protection of the public health, safety, or welfare and/or for the maintenance of public property. This definition shall include, but shall not be limited to, property maintenance services provided by employees of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department, public safety services provided by employees of the Meridian Police Department, and fire protection and medical services provided by employees of the Meridian Fire Department. This definition shall not include services related to permitting, licensing, inspections, or the provision of services by City contractors. (Meridian City Code section 3-4-1.) • SPECIAL EVENT: * * * A special event shall be classified as an “Historic Meridian Special Event” where such special event has occurred within Meridian on an annual basis for seventy-five (75) years or more. (Meridian City Code section 3-4-1.) • It shall be unlawful for an organizer of a large scale special event, or any person, to conduct, allow, organize, or cause to be conducted or organized a large scale special event without the following: * * * A mutually negotiated and agreed upon special event agreement with the city to establish the terms and conditions of any city services or property to be used, whether as required by this chapter or at such organizer’s election, including estimated payment due for all city services provided or necessary to support the event. City may provide city Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 421 of 576 City Attorney’s Office 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite #306 Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-898-5506 www.meridiancity.org services necessary to support Historic Meridian Special Events at no or reduced charge to organizer, as established by written agreement, where the provision of such services is deemed feasible and appropriate in the discretion of the respective department director(s). Notwithstanding the execution of such contract, all provisions of this chapter, including penalties for noncompliance, shall apply, in addition to any remedies set forth in such contract. (Meridian City Code section 3-4-5(F)(3)(b).) By the adoption of Ordinance no. 14-1614, City Council also amended the Parks Code: • Any person or organization may request that the department reserve a reservable park amenity for its lawful use. Upon receipt of such request and payment of applicable fees as established by fee schedule, the department shall reserve reservable park amenities at the time and place, in the manner, and according to the procedures for equitably allocating reservations as enumerated by administrative policy. No reservation fee shall apply to historic Meridian special events as defined in Title 3, Chapter 4 of this Code. (Meridian City Code section 13-2-4(C)(1).) II. AMOUNT OF CITY ’S INVESTMENT In 2014, the City invested a total of $8,168 in Dairy Days, of which $5,982 was for the parade. ACHD also provided materials and flaggers at a cost of $5,374 to ACHD. • 2014 Parade: $50 Citizen’s use permit fee waived $2,005 Police staffing for parade (18 officers) $3,927 Specialty Construction traffic control plan, signs, barricades, flaggers per ACHD requirements • 2014 other: $150 Temporary use permit fee waived $1,400 Parks & Recreation staffing Storey Park during event + $636 Storey Park reservation fee $8,168 In 2015, the City authorized an expenditure of $9,000 for Dairy Days, of which approximately $7,750 was for the parade. (The following numbers are based on a pre-event estimate.) • 2015 Parade: $50 Citizen’s use permit fee waived $2,000 Police staffing for parade (15-18 officers) $5,000 Traffic control plan, signs, barricades, flaggers per ACHD requirements $700 Fire Department EMS/first aid staffing (4 paramedics, 2 roving, 2 at aid station) • 2015 other: $150 Temporary use permit fee waived $1,400 Parks & Recreation staffing Storey Park during event + $636 Storey Park reservation fee $9,936 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 422 of 576 City Attorney’s Office 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite #306 Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-898-5506 www.meridiancity.org In 2016, the City invested $10,037 in Dairy Days, of which approximately $7,541 was for the parade. • 2016 Parade: $50 Citizen’s use permit fee waived $2,192 Police staffing for parade $4,339 Traffic control plan, signs, barricades, flaggers per ACHD requirements $960 Fire Department EMS/first aid command post staffing • 2016 other: $150 Temporary use permit fee waived $1,400 Parks & Recreation staffing Storey Park during event $869 Storey Park reservation fee + $77 Electrical permit fee $10,037 In 2017, the City invested $11,573 in Dairy Days, of which approximately $8,030 was for the parade. • 2017 Parade: $50 Citizen’s use permit fee waived $2,094 Police staffing for parade $4,806 Traffic control plan, signs, barricades, flaggers per ACHD requirements $1080 Fire Department (3 bike medics) • 2017 other: $150 Temporary use permit fee waived $2,364 Parks & Recreation staffing Storey Park during event $964 Storey Park reservation fee + $65 Electrical permit fee $11,573 In 2018, the City invested $7,596.72 in Dairy Days, of which approximately $5,142.12 was for the parade. • 2018 Parade: $150 Large-Scale Temporary Use Permit fee waived (Citizen’s $664.12 Police staffing for parade $4,078 Traffic control plan, signs, barricades, flaggers per ACHD requirements $250 Fire Department staff costs • 2018 other: $1,420 Parks & Recreation staffing Storey Park during event $964.60 Storey Park reservation fee + $70 Electrical permit fee $7,596.72 III. MECHANISM OF AWARD TO DAIRY DAYS 2014 opened a new chapter for the Dairy Days parade, because it was the first year the Split Corridor was complete, necessitating a new parade route; ACHD had advised the Dairy Board that it would no longer provide traffic safet y devices such as barricades and cones, and that volunteers would no longer be acceptable for traffic control; and City staff advised City Council that the costs of providing City servi ces to support the parade (as well as the event in the park) were growing with the growth of Meridian’s population. An Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 423 of 576 City Attorney’s Office 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite #306 Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-898-5506 www.meridiancity.org interdepartmental team of City staff members proposed an ordinance that would formalize the City’s relationship with the Dairy Board as a partner in providing services necessary to support Dairy Days. City Council passed the ordinance, and staff worked with the Dairy Board to identify and cover costs. In 2015, the Dairy Board president made a presentation to City Council requesting that the City absorb all costs related to City services and the traffic plan. Following City Council deliberation, City Council agreed to fulfill this request. The Mayor sent a letter to the Dairy Board advising them of the City’s contribution to Dairy Days. On May 17, 2016, the Dairy Board president made a presentation to City Council requesting that the City absorb all costs related to City services and the traffic plan. On May 24, 2016, the Mayor noted that the cost of the City services necessary to support Dairy Days, including the traffic plan, would be absorbed as part of the departments’ respective budgets. On May 23, 2017, the Dairy Board president appeared before City Council to make a request for the contribution, and, following deliberation, Council authorized a not-to-exceed amount of $4,600 for the traffic control plan and directed staff to coordinate with the Dairy Board to provide the other City services. The costs of the City services were absorbed as part of the departments’ respective budgets. On May 22, 2018, the Dairy Board president appeared before City Council to make a request from the City of $6,000 to be used for preparation of the traffic control plan. City Council authorized a not-to-exceed amount of $6,000 to the Dairy Board. The costs of the City services were absorbed as part of the departments’ respective budgets. Since 2015, other than the minutes reflecting City Council’s authorization of the City’s investment, no other documentation has been used to memorialize the decision. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 424 of 576 SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 348 Northwest l3th Place. Meridian, Idaho E3642 Phone (208) 322-68W o Fax (208) 322-2636 o Toll Free (888) 57+7732 www.speciatysupply.com ld.ho Rrbllc Wo.t Llc$.. t PWC.C-lZtltl-AA^.24 (Oil?85,01gto, 18ru0,0r5t0, 07100) EtN | 20€rzut50 Dlrl{S t l}710.7!150 Contr.clor Llc.nra * RCE4056O Or.lon Co|r.trucflon B.gbhtion t178588 OUOTATION Ertlmator: J€remyHopkins Prolcct: Meridian Dairy Days 2019 TTEH OUAilTTTY UlIlTS 125 mnhr Estinate Only DESCRIPTIOI{ Mobilzalion & Maintenance Tratfc Control SQns Baricad€s Tubular Markers (Candles) Anow Board Fhgging - 7 flaggprs Page 1 Bid De!e: 3l?2121019 UI{T PRICE TOTAL $ 31.00 $ 3,875.00 3.05 $ 183.0060 28 300 4.75 1.75 44.25 1S1.00 525.00 132.75 1,050.00 5,898.75 $ $ $ $ $aa mnhr 30.00 $ TOTAL . At y clr',trlgtas 6 'r,dilbrrd trgnt ped by ActlD d othe't) rill b uH rt ilE Fr dt ptbh'g. 'N; s5pp;ttt srCnt (tnl6,7rrgn1on ttgns or tfrq?t rgrnogtet6) ,tdtffi. A.rdn o,Dt f6ct uottttt WU' 'Ott trtit,8tcctfin t6 onty - unn pt'c8 p'r,vrlL* 'EM ff;,rrd,rot tnct t&(t,n Ni6 - lt rqufird., dd 25xto oYcrrtt.t toe. |oi&,. 35 ' Prices q$l6d indu& Eales or u8€ l,ax, ' Totats and at!.aoc pticls atc rhown br your conrtiild|ca. Our in\'oice will rei€ct thG unit pricss tot the ac[la] quantitiss re$irsd a.d lurnishod. ' DoGs not inclre ligt{ torr6rs. ' Prir6 a|e bas€d on turiahlq al ol th€ mebdal on lti8 (|lotltiofi. ftic.6 oi indivldual itrms may bc naooliatld. ' Ouaditrog ars bassd on our take oll End atg not guatantood. ' Abovs prices qt ot€d br accsgiatEa *'ittin 30 dNys and apply lo this Foisd qty. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 425 of 576 SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 3,{a NW l3th Place, lieridian, lD. Phone (mA) 322-€,800 Fax (208) 322-2636 Toll Fr€e (888) 57+7732 rvww.specialtysuPPt com m.inv.n@@h t oEfH Close Southbour'd r Place Road Cloe€d Ai€ad ofr All Sld6treeb Lod.lg Up To Every TtDo 3 Every Flag[Er lv|l A€ Cov€r€d Wlh Fl4ghg SlSns f_ltlnll ---9l6l| ,,,t eq ,AtX\z 'A talfic cofitol wil bo daced lo M.U.IC.D. s@ing shrdaxb as a&pl€d by t|e Stals ot ldallo This Can b fl€ copridi of Sp€daly CotEtudioo Stlpdy and ifs u$e b E$ired b use by p.rnt*h dty 'Conf&lois r{fl be a6po.tsbb ba Cdjm d*'ealbn ard]rdo@ hft ii tle d0[ oftay 'Tlis b tDl a Erdn€d shrryd Phn 184 Dtb: 4t319 Arihor: Dairy Days ;-l-;--l Th€s€ sir6 streets listed x![ lEve tll Banl,?(bs and noed Clos€d Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 426 of 576 CjQ/rE IDIAN*,-----IZ DAHJ CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 11 6 Project File Name/Number: H-2019-0053 Item Title: Final Plat for Keep Subdivision By Jarron Langston, Located at the SW Corner of S. Eagle Rd and E. Lake Hazel Rd. Meeting Notes: +-'o I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 11.B . Presenter: Estimated Time for P resentation: Title of I tem - F inal P lat for K eep Subdivision (H-2019-0053) by J arron L angston, Located at the S W Corner of S . E agle Rd and E . L ake Hazel Rd The applicant has requested a continuance C lic k Here for Applic atio n Materials C ouncil Notes: RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/17/2019 - 3:03 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 427 of 576 City Council Meeting May 21, 2019 Location 35’ Landscape Buffer Encroachment Easements 35’ 20’ Landscape Plan Site Plan Zoning Map AerialFLUM Conceptual Site Plan/Pedestrian Circulation Plan (REVISED) Preliminary Plat Phasing Plan Landscape Plan Residential Qualified Open Space Site Plan/Pedestrian Circulation Plan (REVISED) Assisted Living Facility (IA,-----Q/rE IDIN DAJ CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 11 C Project File Name/Number: H-2019-0052 Item Title: Public Hearing for Orchard Creek Pump House By OA+D Located on the North Side of Lake Hazel Rd., East of S. Eagle Rd 1. Request; Variance from the dimensional standards of the R-8 district listed in the UDC Table 11-2A-6 to allow for the construction of a 350 square foot structure within the required setbacks and street landscape buffer. Meeting Notes: WA I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 11.C . Presenter: Estimated Time for P resentation: Title of I tem - Public Hearing for Orchard Creek Pump House (H-2019-0052) by O A+D , L ocated on the nor th side of L ake Hazel Rd., E ast of S . E agle Rd. C lic k Here for Applic atio n Materials C lic k Here to S ign Up to Tes tify at Hearing C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate S taff Report S taf f R eport 5/17/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/17/2019 - 3:03 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 428 of 576 5/21/2019 City of Meridian - Public Hearing Sign In Form Tools Details and Signatures For Public Hearing Hearing Date: 5/21/2019 Hearing Type: Council Item Number: 11-C Project Name: Orchard Creek Pump House Project No.: H-2019-0052 Active: � Signature City -State- I Wish To Sign In Address For Against Neutral Name Zip Testify Date/Time 321 E Broadway Meridian 5/21/2019 Test X X X 83642 4:02:54 PM Go Back To List Export To Excel © 2019 - City of Meridian, Idaho http:Hi nternalapps/SIGN INFORM TOOLS/Si gnlnForm Detai Is?id=237 1/1 Changes to Agenda: Item #11 B: The Keep — FP (H-2019-0053) — Applicant requests this item be tabled to the May 28th meeting in order to submit some additional items requested by Staff. Item 11C: Orchard Creek Pump House (H-2019-0052) Application(s): ➢ Variance Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 2.28 acres of land, zoned R-8, located just north of E. Lake Hazel Rd. and east of S. Eagle Rd. History: In 2014, this property was annexed and preliminary platted as Hill's Century Farm, In 2018, this section was final platted as Bicentennial Farms No. 1 with 47 single family homes and 11 common lots on 19.29 acres of land. It is currently being marketed under the name Orchard Creek Subdivision. Summary of Request: The applicant requests a variance to deviate from the dimensional standards of the R-8 district to allow for the construction of a 350 square foot structure within the required setbacks and street landscape buffer. The proposed structure will serve three purposes: 1) a pump house for subdivision irrigation equipment, 2) covered structure for a dog park, and 3) a subdivision entryway feature. The previous owner of the property installed the well and irrigation equipment at this location, without the approval of the City. In order for Idaho Power to supply power to irrigation pumps, they require them to be enclosed in a permanent structure. This proposed building is encroaching approximately 8 feet into the 35 foot landscape buffer along Lake Hazel Road, which is designated as an entryway corridor. As you can see in the exhibit, this site is constrained by a number of features, including multiple easements (ACHD and City), the Ten Mile Creek to the west, and roads to the east and south. Staff does believe there is sufficient space to place this structure in a location outside of these areas (shifting slightly to the northwest for example); however, it's staffs understanding that this is not feasible at this time as the irrigation facility is currently providing water to the development. In addition, the applicant would have to further subdivide the property to place the irrigation facility on a separate dedicated lot as required by code. Staff is supportive of the proposed multi -use nature of the facility and finds that as a whole it would be a benefit to the residents of the subdivision. In addition, the appearance of the building emulates other design features of the subdivision and is more visually attractive than the majority of pump houses built. Based on the required findings in the staff report, staff recommends denial of the variance request. Staff Recommendation: denial Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: None Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2019-0052, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 21, 2019: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2019-0052, as presented during the hearing on May 21, 2019, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2019-0052 to the hearing date of May 21, 2019 for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) Meridian Research Park (development to the west of the subject property) — prefers the current location of the east/west street (i.e. Waverton) in alignment with the main entrance to Franklin Sensors as opposed to the proposed location further to the north; safety concerns pertaining to truck and vehicle traffic going through the hospital site to access Meridian Research Park and extra turning movements — prefer hospital location on the east side of N. Levi Ave.; LaFever - Concern pertaining to the impact on taxpayers by possibly having to build a fire station and get equipment sooner than envisioned to service this area and whether the City will purchase land to build or lease the space for the Police substation or if the Developer will be donating the lease space as a quasi -public space for the development; concern pertaining to the intensity of uses planned on this site and associated traffic impacts on SH -20/26 and SH -16; would like to see the 24/7 hours of operation of the hospital go through the CUP process (which it will because a hospital use requires CUP approval in a C -G zoning district). Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: • Refinement needed to the site plan for the public/quasi-public spaces provided within the commercial portions of the development referenced in A.1e and f; • Concern pertaining to receiving a draft staff report from ACHD the day of the meeting on 3/21 and not having adequate time to review the report prior to the hearing; and concern pertaining to outstanding issues noted in their memo that need to be addressed; • Would like to see revisions to the conceptual development plan as noted in Section VIII before the Commission makes a recommendation to Council on the application — continued public hearing to April 181h in order to receive final ACHD report to address the roadway concerns and effects on adjacent properties, additional time to understand Fire Dept, needs and abilities to service this project and see revisions to the concept plan in response to items noted in Section VIII; • Timing for construction of Waverton to the east in Fairborne Subdivision from N. Black Cat Rd.; • Location of a sewer lift station on site; and, • Location of the east/west collector street (Waverton) and access to the Franklin Sensor/Meridian Research Park property. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: • Modification to condition #A.2c in Section VIII to allow the street buffer to be in a permanent dedicated buffer or a 20 -foot wide common lot; • Modification to condition #A.6 in Section VIII to require the detail of the children's play equipment to be submitted with the "applicable residential" final plat application; • Modification to condition #A.3f to allow alternative compliance to be requested to the requirement for a berm or berm/wall combination to be provided within the street buffer as noise abatement adjacent to SH -20/26 if the Applicant has a substitute noise abatement proposal in accord with ITD standards and prepared by a qualified sound engineer as allowed by UDC 11 -3H - 4D.4; • Modification to condition #B.1.2 in Section VIII to require the lift station to be located at the northwest corner of the subject property as proposed by the Applicant on a 50' x 120' parcel; Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: • The Commission directed the Applicant to work with their neighbors to the west (i.e. Franklin Sensors) to find a solution on the transportation/road issue as well as provision of signage at Levi and the driveway south of the hospital to the west and Waverton to direct truck vs. car traffic to the Franklin Sensors site; and, • Per the specific use standards, hospitals providing emergency care are required to have direct access on an arterial street — the access proposed will be via a collector street from SH -20/26 from which access is prohibited except at the half mile between section line roads. The City Council should determine if this meets the intent of the requirement; if so, it should be memorialized in the Development Agreement. Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: Keith McGregor & David Dorrough, Franklin Sensors Notes: Page 1 HEARING DATE: 5/21/2019 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Kevin Holmes, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2019-0052 Orchard Creek Pump House- VAR LOCATION: North side of Lake Hazel Road; east of S. Eagle Road (Lot 1, Block 1 of Bicentennial Farms No. 1), in the S ½ of the SW ¼ of Section 33, Township 3N., Range 1E. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant requests a variance to deviate from the dimensional standards of the R-8 district listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 to allow for the construction of a 350 square foot structure within the required setbacks and street landscape buffer. The structure will serve multiple purposes of a pump house for subdivision irrigation equipment, an entrance/shade structure for a dog park to be used as a subdivision amenity, and a subdivision entryway feature. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Description Details Acreage 2.28 Future Land Use Designation Medium-High Density Residential Existing Land Use Vacant Proposed Land Use(s) Subdivision accessory structure and amenity Current Zoning R-8 Proposed Zoning NA Physical Features (waterways, hazards, flood plain, hillside) Ten Mile Creek runs along the west boundary of the site Neighborhood meeting date; # of attendees: April 3, 2019; 0 attendees History (previous approvals) AZ-14-012; PP-14-014; H-2018-0027 (Final Plat) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 429 of 576 Page 2 B. Project Area Maps III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Brian Garrett, OA+D – 210 N. 6th Street, Boise, ID 83702 B. Owner: Toll ID I, LLC c/o Toll Bros., Inc. – 250 Gibraltor Road, Horsham, PA 19044 C. Representative: Chad Hamilton, Trek Commercial Development – 3023 E. Copper Point Drive, Meridian, ID 83642 Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Planned Development Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 430 of 576 Page 3 IV. NOTICING City Council Posting Date Newspaper Notification 5/3/2019 Radius notification mailed to properties within 300 feet 4/30/2019 Radius notification published on 4/30/2019 Nextdoor posting 4/30/2019 V. STAFF ANALYSIS Per the applicant, the position of this structure is a result of the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District and the previous property owner placing an irrigation pump and related equipment at this location. In order for the irrigation pumps to be supplied power, Idaho Power requires the pump to be contained in an enclosed structure. This facility will serve the irrigation needs of the surrounding subdivision and is a requirement of the development to provide a pressurized irrigation system for the Orchard Creek development in accord with UDC 11-3A-15. During the construction of the facility, the applicant chose to relocate the facility closer towards Lake Hazel in order to provide more of a recreational amenity for the subdivision. Because the pump facility was not located on a separate lot as required by the UDC, it is now proposed to be located within the entryway corridor street buffer along Lake Hazel Road which violates the setback requirements of the R-8 dimensional standards. The applicant requests a variance to deviate from the dimensional standards of the R-8 district listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6. Because this site is located on an entryway corridor, E. Lake Hazel Rd., Table 11-2A-6 requires a thirty-five foot (35’) landscape buffer. The southwest corner of the structure is proposed to be located approximately 28’ from the right -of-way of E. Lake Hazel Rd. which puts it in the required landscape buffer, see Exhibit D. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 431 of 576 Page 4 Table 11-2A-6: NOTE: The dimensional “street setback” standards listed in Table 11-2A-6 are intended to be requirements for residential structures and are not necessarily meant to apply to quasi-commercial structures such as this pump house/amenity/entrance building. This is apparent by the language used to describe the standards, such as “dwelling unit”, “garage”, and “living area”. As this structure is not a residential use, and does not have a “living area” but rather is a subdivision amenity and pump house, staff believes it is appropriate to look to commercial zones for guidance on what appropriate setbacks are. Per Table 11-2B-3, commercial setbacks are generally zero feet (0’) and measurements are taken from the ultimate location of the right-of-way. Staff supports the application of these commercial standards to this structure and as such, the residential dimensions of Table 11-2A-6 do not apply. Staff has discussed internally codifying this determination with a future UDC text amendment. The lot that houses the structure is an unusual shape and contains a number of constraints which reduce the buildable area. These include the Ten Mile Creek and an ACHD easement along the western boundary, a City of Meridian water easement to the north, a collector street (S. Arable Way) to the east, and an arterial road (E. Lake Hazel Rd.) to the south. While these site features do pose limitations, staff believes there is sufficient space for a structure of this size without encroaching into the required landscape buffer. However, relocating the structure elsewhere on the property would not be feasible at this time as the irrigation facility is currently supplying water to the development. Further, the applicant does not have additional land area to place the irrigation facility on a separate dedicated lot in accord with UDC 11-3B-6E. In regards to public safety, this structure meets the requirements of vision triangle in accord with UDC 11-3A-3B. Staff has no concerns of the impact of this structure with any other public safety issues. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 432 of 576 Page 5 Staff supports the design and multi-purpose use of the structure. The appearance of the building is visually attractive and emulates design features of other site amenities in the Orchard Creek Subdivision (platted as Bicentennial Farms No. 1). The multi-use building benefits the subdivision as a whole as it provides an additional amenity on an irregular shaped lot that would otherwise be landscaped as open space. Staff has received a complete Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) and Design Review (DES) application which originally brought this code violation to light. Should Council grant this variance, staff will review the proposed development for compliance with all applicable City of Meridian code and design requirements through the CZC/DES process. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff is recommending denial of the subject Variance application based on the Findings listed in Section VII of the Staff Report. B. City Council: Enter Summary of City Council Decision. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 433 of 576 Page 6 VII. EXHIBITS (ATTACH AS PDF DOCUMENTS TO THE STAFF REPORT.) A. Site Plan (date: 3/31/2019) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 434 of 576 Page 7 B. Landscape Plan (date: 2/28/2019) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 435 of 576 Page 8 C. Building Elevations/Renderings (date: 3/1/2019) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 436 of 576 Page 9 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 437 of 576 Page 10 D. Landscape Buffer Encroachment Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 438 of 576 Page 11 VIII. FINDINGS The City Council shall apply the standards listed in Idaho Code 67-6516 and all the findings listed in Section 11-5B-4.E of the UDC to review the variance request. In order to grant a variance, the Council shall make the following findings: A. The variance shall not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district: In regard to the variance to UDC 11-2A-6 for the encroachment into the landscape buffer, Staff finds granting a variance would grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district because there is sufficient space for a structure of this size without encroaching into the required landscape buffer. B. The variance relieves an undue hardship because of characteristics of the site; Because the site is constrained by the Ten Mile Creek and ACHD and City of Meridian easements, Staff finds granting the variance would relieve an undue hardship because of characteristics of the site. If the structure was to be moved outside of the landscape buffer to comply with code the size of the dog park would be limited, reducing the benefits to subdivision residents. Further, relocating the structure elsewhere on the property would not be feasible at this time as the irrigation facility is currently supplying water to the development and the applicant does not have additional land area to place the irrigation facility on a separate dedicated lot in accord with UDC 11-3B-6E. C. The variance shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. Staff finds granting the variance would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 439 of 576 �jQirE IDIZ IAN,? -- I DAHJ CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 11 D Project File Name/Number: H-2019-0021 Item Title: Public Hearing for Pollard Subdivision By Brighton Investments, LLC., Located NE Corner of SH -16 and W. Chinden Blvd. 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 77.33 acres of land with R-8 (21.95 acres) and C -G (55.38 acres) zoning districts 2. Request: A Preliminary Plat consisting of 75 building lots, 7 common lots and 4 other lots on 71.3 acres of land in the R-8 and C -G zoning Districts Meeting Notes: Coor,Gl fv1whe/- 5e<n� QECoseJ I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 11.D . Presenter: Estimated Time for P resentation: Title of I tem - Public Hearing for Pollard Subdivision (H-2019-0021) by B righton Investments, L L C , Located NE C orner of S H-16 and W. C hinden Blvd. C lic k Here for Applic atio n Materials C lic k Here to S ign Up to Tes tify at Hearing C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate S taff Report S taf f R eport 5/16/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/16/2019 - 12:37 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 440 of 576 5/21/2019 City of Meridian - Public Hearing Sign In Form Tools Details and Signatures For Public Hearing Hearing Date: 5/21/2019 Hearing Type: Council Item Number: 11-D Project Name: Pollard Subdivision Project No.: H-2019-0021 Active: Signature City- I Wish To Sign In Address For Against Neutral Name State -Zip Testify Date/Time 7100 N Pollard Ln Meridian 5/21/2019 Robin Hayes X X Idaho 83646 5:51:06 PM Lucretia 5/21/2019 614 11th ave n nampa id X wilson 5:53:02 PM Delynn 5/21/2019 2412 n lark ave X Searle 5:55:39 PM Tamela 5/21/2019 3646 W Balducci St Meridian X X Paxman 5:56:10 PM 5/21/2019 Jay Paxman 3646 W Balducci St, Meridian X X 5:57:14 PM 5/21/2019 Juan carlos 12848 hayes st caldwell id X 5:57:24 PM 5/21/2019 Ashley Pena 805 Albany St Caldwell X 5:58:39 PM 5/21/2019 Marie Pena 805 Albany Street Caldwell X 5:58:56 PM 5/21/2019 Rea Davis 24842 Sunburst Drive X 5:59:09 PM 5/21/2019 Owen barnes 3445 e woodville dr X X 6:00:31 PM http:Hi nternalapps/SIGN INFORM TOOLS/Si gnlnForm Detai Is?id=238 1/2 5/21/2019 City of Meridian - Public Hearing Sign In Form Tools Go Back To List Export To Excel © 2019 - City of Meridian, Idaho http://i nternalapps/SIGN IN FORMTOOLS/SignlnForm Detai Is?id=238 2/2 5/21/2019 Jacob Barrett X X 6:01:06 PM Keith 6675 N Pollard Ln Meridian 5/21/2019 X X McGregor Idaho 83646 6:01:24 PM David 6675 n pollard lane. Meridian 5/21/2019 X Dorrough idaho 6:06:09 PM Michelle 3044 W Sugarberry Dr, Eagle, 5/21/2019 X X Dorrough ID 83616 6:06:33 PM 5/21/2019 Karen Garcia 6675 N Pollard Lane, Meridian X 6:22:08 PM Go Back To List Export To Excel © 2019 - City of Meridian, Idaho http://i nternalapps/SIGN IN FORMTOOLS/SignlnForm Detai Is?id=238 2/2 Page 1 HEARING DATE: April 18, 2019 (Continued from: March 21, 2019) TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Sonya Allen, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2019-0021 Pollard Subdivision (aka Central Valley Plaza) LOCATION: Off the northeast corner of SH-16 and W. Chinden Blvd., in the SW ¼ of Section 21, T.4N., R.1W. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Annexation and zoning of 77.33 acres of land with R-8 (21.95 acres) an C-G (55.38 acres) zoning districts; and Preliminary plat consisting of (75) building lots, (7) common lots and (4) other lots on 71.3 acres of land in the R-8 and C-G zoning districts for Pollard Subdivision. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Description Details Page Acreage 71.3 Future Land Use Designation MDR, MU-C and MU-I Existing Land Use Vacant/undeveloped land Proposed Land Use(s) Mixed-use medical/professional, retail/commercial and residential Current Zoning RUT in Ada County Proposed Zoning R-8 and C-G Lots (# and type; bldg/common) 75 building/7 common/3 private common driveways Phasing plan (# of phases) Yes; 3 phases Number of Residential Units (type of units) 74 SFR units (and 88 beds in an assisted living facility) Density (gross & net) 3.4 gross/5.19 net Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 441 of 576 Page 2 B. Community Metrics Open Space (acres, total [%] / buffer / qualified) 2.74 acres (12.6%) (residential only) Amenities 10’ wide multi-use pathway, children’s play structure Physical Features (waterways, hazards, flood plain, hillside) An irrigation ditch runs along the southern boundary of this site; this site is not within the floodplain. Neighborhood meeting date; # of attendees: December 18, 2018; 9 attendees History (previous approvals) None Description Details Page Ada County Highway District Staff report (yes/no) No Yes Requires ACHD Commission Action (yes/no) Yes; scheduled for April 310, 2019 Note: Franklin Sensors (the business on the adjacent property to the west) does not want the east/west collector street to be relocated further to the north. Fire Service Distance to Fire Station 2.5 miles from Fire Station #5 Fire Response Time 5 minutes under ideal conditions Resource Reliability 77% from Fire Station #5 – does not meet the target goal of 85% or greater Risk Identification 4 – Current resources would not be adequate to supply service to this project (see comments in Section VII.C Accessibility Project does not meet all required access, road widths and turnarounds; roadways needs to be 26’ wide for ladder truck access Special/resource needs An aerial device is required; the closest truck company is 15 minutes travel time (under ideal conditions) – Fire Dept. can’t meet this need in the required timeframe. Water Supply Requires 2,250 gallons per minute for 2 hours Other Resources NA Police Service Distance to Police Station 9 miles Police Response Time 5-7 minutes Calls for Service NA (site is currently in Ada County) Accessibility No issues with the proposed access Specialty/resource needs No additional resources are needed at this time; the PD already services the area to the east Crimes Crashes Wastewater Distance to Sewer Services 0 Sewer Shed North McDermott Trunkshed Estimated Project Sewer ERU’s See application information Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 442 of 576 Page 3 WRRF Declining Balance 13.62 Project Consistent with WW Master Plan/Facility Plan Yes Impacts/Concerns Although this development falls within the North McDermott Trunkshed, mainlines that will provide service do not exist at this time. The Public Works Department has evaluated and conceptually approved the developers proposal to temporarily pump wastewater to the adjacent Black Cat T runkshed to the East. The permanent Lift Station site, contemplated in the Meridian Wastewater Master Plan, is located north of the subject development and on the west side of N. Pollard Lane. However, the developer is proposing to locate the Lift Station in the northwest corner of the proposed development. The developer shall be required to work out the final design location with the Public Works Department, and deed the necessary land to the city with completion of the station The Lift Station shall be satisfactorily completed and accepted prior to the first occupancy permit being issued within the development. This development shall be required to install the permanent forcemain (dryline) under Chinden to facilitate an easy transition when service from the McDermott Trunkshed becomes available. Water Distance to Water Services NA Pressure Zone NA Estimated Project Water ERU’s See application information Water Quality NA Project Consistent with Water Master Plan NA Impacts/Concerns Water service being provided by Suez Water Idaho. Applicant will need to work closely with Suez and the City of Meridian to ensure that adequate water flow and pressures can be provide to the development to provide for domestic needs and fire protection. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 443 of 576 Page 4 C. Project Maps III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Brighton Investments, LLC – 12601 W. Explorer Dr., Ste. 200, Boise, ID 83713 B. Owner: Tomlinson Family Trust – 12601 W. Explorer Dr., Ste. 200, Boise, ID 83713 C. Representative: Mike Wardle, Brighton Corporation – 12601 W. Explorer Dr., Ste. 200, Boise, ID 83713 Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Planned Development Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 444 of 576 Page 5 IV. NOTICING Planning & Zoning Posting Date City Council Posting Date Newspaper Notification 3/1/2019 Radius notification mailed to properties within 300 feet 2/26/2019 Public hearing notice sign posted on site 3/6/2019 Nextdoor posting 2/26/2019 V. STAFF ANALYSIS A. ANNEXATION & ZONING The Applicant requests annexation and zoning of 77.33 acres of land with R-8 (21.95 acres) and C-G (55.38 acres) zoning districts. A conceptual site plan and building elevations were submitted for the development, included in Sections VII.E and F. Proposed Use Analysis: The proposed development will be anchored by a medical campus consisting of a 95K square foot (s.f.) medical office building which will eventually include a surgical center, free -standing emergency department and a 50-bed hospital. Three Four (34) 48K s.f. professional office buildings, (2) buildings with 72K s.f. of “flex” office space which is anticipated to house a police substation, retail with a convenience store, multi-tenant retail/office, a health club, (34) conventional single-family residential homes, (40) single-family residential independent living homes, and an 88-bed assisted living facility. The Allowed Uses table in UDC Table 11-2A-2 for the R-8 zoning district lists single-family residential homes (attached and detached) as a principally permitted use; and a residential care facility as a conditional use subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-29. The Allowed Uses table in UDC Table 11-2B-2 for the C-G zoning district lists healthcare or social services, professional services, public or quasi-public uses, flex space subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-18, indoor recreation facility (i.e. health club) subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-2, and retail as principal permitted uses; and hospitals as a conditional use subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-22. Per the specific use standards, hospitals providing emergency care are required to have direct access on an arterial street – the access proposed will be via a collector street from SH-20/26 from which access is prohibited except at the half mile between section line roads. The City Council should determine if this meets the intent of the requirement; if so, it should be memorialized in the Development Agreement. Additionally, the specific use standards for flex space prohibit roll-up doors from being visible from a public street; the flex space buildings are proposed to have roll-up doors which will be visible from facing the collector street. As mitigation, the Applicant proposes to construct a berm with landscaping along the street to screen the doors from the street; a perspective drawing should be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application that demonstrates compliance. Staff recommends the buildings be relocated so they each front on public streets (i.e. Waverton & Narbeth) or rotate the buildings 90 degrees with the rear of the structures facing each other; or some other alternative that allows compliance. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 445 of 576 Page 6 Comprehensive Plan (https://www.meridiancity.org/compplan): This property is encompassed by three (3) different Future Land Use Map designations as follows: MDR (35+/- acres), MU-C (18+/- acres), MU-I (16+/- acres). See Future Land Use Map in Section II.C for specific areas of each designation. The MDR (Medium Density Residential) designation allows smaller lots for residential purposes within City limits. Uses may include single-family homes at gross densities of 3 to 8 units per acre. Single-family residential attached/detached homes at a gross density of 3.4 units/acre and an 88-bed assisted living facility are proposed in this area consistent with the MDR designation. The MU-C (Mixed Use – Community) designation allocates areas where community- servicing uses and dwellings are seamlessly integrated into the urban fabric. The intent is to integrate a variety of uses, including residential, and to avoid mainly single-use and strip commercial type buildings. Non-residential buildings in these areas have a tendency to be larger than in MU-N (Mixed-Use Neighborhood) designated areas but not as large as in MU- R (Mixed Use – Regional) designated areas. Goods and services in these areas tend to be of the variety that people will mainly travel by car to but also walk or bike to (up to 3 or 4 miles). Employment opportunities for those living in and around the neighborhood are encouraged. Office, flex-office and retail uses are proposed in the MU-C designated area. No residential uses are proposed in the MU-C area on this site; however, medium density residential uses were recently approved on the adjacent 12+/- acres directly to the east which consists of approximately 20% of the overall MU-C area in accord with the Comprehensive Plan. The MU-I (Mixed Use – Interchange) designation calls out areas where construction of future SH-16 interchanges is likely to occur and to acknowledge that this land will have a high degree of visibility. These areas will be served by highway interchange ramps and restricted local access. Uses in this area will need to be compatible with the impacts of a freeway interchange. However, these uses are not intended for high volume retail or uses that are better suited in neighborhood centers or commercial areas. The intention is to protect the immediate vicinity of the interchange from traffic conflicts and shift the high traffic- generating uses away from the immediate vicinity of the interchange. A medical campus, surgical center, hospital and emergency care is proposed within the MU-I designated area consistent with uses desired in MU-I designated areas. Transportation: The Master Street Map (MSM) depicts a planned north/south residential collector street through this site generally from W. Chinden Blvd. to the northeast. The proposed plat depicts a north/south collector street (N. Levi Ave.) from Chinden Blvd. intersecting with an east/west collector street (W. Waverton Dr.) connecting to Fairbourne Subdivision to the east and N. Black Cat Rd., which is generally consistent with the MSM. Land Use: The proposed land use for this site is mixed use medical/professional, hospital, retail/commercial, flex space, public/quasi-public, nursing care facility and residential consistent with the associated FLUM designations. Comprehensive Plan Policies (https://www.meridiancity.org/compplan): Goals, Objectives, & Action Items: Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this application and apply to the proposed use of this property (staff analysis in italics): Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 446 of 576 Page 7 “Provide for a wide diversity of housing types (single-family, modular, mobile homes and multi-family arrangements) and choices between ownership and rental dwelling units for all income groups in a variety of locations suitable for residential development.” (3.07.03B) A mix of single-family attached and detached homes are proposed within this development some of which will be age restricted 55+ which will provide for a diversity in housing types as desired. “Provide housing options close to employment and shopping centers.” (3.07.02D) The proposed development will provide housing options in close proximity to future office and commercial uses planned to develop on the adjacent property to the south. “Consider ACHD’s Master Street Map (MSM) in all land use decisions.” (3.03.04K) The MSM depicts a north/south collector roadway across this site providing access from SH- 20/26 to the northeast. The proposed street network is consistent with the MSM. “Require open space areas within all development.” (6.01.01A) An open space exhibit is included in Section VII.D that complies with the minimum UDC standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3. “Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is contiguous to the City.” (3.01.01F) The proposed development is contiguous to the City and urban services can be provided to this development. “Restrict private curb cuts and access points on collectors and arterial streets.” (3.06.02D) One (1) access is proposed via W. Chinden Blvd./SH-20/26, a state highway, at the half mile between section line roads as allowed in UDC 11-3H-4B.2. Access points via the proposed collector streets should be limited as set forth in UDC 11-3A-3 to ensure public safety. Staff is of the opinion the proposed accesses shown in Section VII.E are acceptable unless otherwise restricted by the City Council. “Work with ACHD, COMPASS, and VRT on bringing public transportation to and through Meridian.” (3.03.04H) VRT’s long-term plan (ValleyConnect 2.0) does not include any service along W. Chinden Blvd./SH-20/26 in this area. “Require pedestrian access connectors in all new development to link subdivisions together to promote neighborhood connectivity as part of a community pathway system.” (3.03.03B) A pedestrian circulation plan is included in Section VII.G that depicts pedestrian walkways throughout the development and to adjacent properties for interconnectivity. “Work with transportation agencies and private property owners to preserve transportation corridors, future transit routes and infrastructure, road and highway extensions, and to facilitate access management planning.” (3.01.01J) The Applicant has been working with ITD on the proposed access via SH-20/26 and with ACHD on the proposed internal roadways. “Develop alternative modes of transportation through pedestrian improvements, bicycle lanes, off-street pathways, and transit-oriented development as appropriate.” (3.03.03D) Pedestrian walkways and proposed throughout the development; a multi-use pathway is proposed within the street buffer along SH-20/26; VRT (ValleyConnect 2.0) does not have any plans for bus service along SH-20/26; and bicycle lanes should be provided along collector streets. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 447 of 576 Page 8 In reviewing development applications, the following items will be considered in all Mixed Use areas, per the Comprehensive Plan (pgs. 23-24): (Staff’s analysis in italics) • “Residential densities should be a minimum of six dwellings/acre.” As noted above, no residential uses are proposed on the subject MU-C designated area but residential uses have been approved on the adjacent property to the east. • “Where feasible, higher density and/or multi-family residential development will be encouraged, especially for projects with the potential to serve as employment destination centers and when the project is adjacent to US 20/26, SH-55, SH-16 or SH-69.” This project is adjacent to two (2) state highways – SH-20/26 and SH-16. The proposed development does not include high density and/or multi-family development; 74 medium density residential units and an 88-bed assisted living facility are proposed, which will not provide for the density desired in close proximity to employment destinations such as this. • “A conceptual site plan for the entire mixed-use area should be included in the application.” A conceptual development plan was submitted for the proposed mixed use development, included in Section VII.E. • “In developments where multiple commercial and/or office buildings are proposed (not residential), the buildings should be arranged to create some form of common, usable area, such as a plaza or green space.” Green space is proposed within the medical campus and in the office portion of the development. A common usable area should be provided for each of these areas as envisioned. The Applicant submitted a revised plan that depicts proposed public plaza areas within the development (see Section VIII.G); 3 of the 4 areas depicted are located adjacent to the main entry/collector roads and/or aren’t centrally located or connected to the area around the adjacent buildings which they’ll serve – Staff recommends more central usable plaza areas are planned for with development of each of the commercial/office areas located in closer proximity to structures away from adjacent collector streets. • “The site plan should depict a transitional use and/or landscaped buffering between commercial and existing low- or medium-density residential development.” The proposed plan depicts office uses as a transition from more intense commercial uses to the planned medium density residential development to the east. A 25-foot wide landscape buffer with a 6-foot all wood fence is proposed along the east boundary of the commercial portion of the site to buffer the future medium density residential uses to the east. (Note: An additional 23-foot wide common lot is proposed adjacent to this buffer on the residential property where the Harrell Lateral is located which will provide additional separation between the residential homes and commercial development.) • “A mixed-use project should include at least three types of land uses [i.e. commercial (includes retail, restaurants, etc.), office, residential, civic (includes public open space, parks, entertainment venues, etc.), and industrial]. Exceptions may be granted for smaller sites on a case-by-case basis.” The proposed development will at a minimum include commercial retail, office and residential uses as desired. • “Community-serving facilities such as hospitals, churches, schools, parks, daycares, civic buildings, or public safety facilities are expected in larger mixed-use developments.” A hospital and associated medical offices as well as a police substation are proposed within this development. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 448 of 576 Page 9 • “Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks, plazas, outdoor gathering areas, open space, libraries, and schools are expected; outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count.” The proposed revised site plan does not in Section VII.G incorporate depicts public and/or quasi-public spaces and places; the common area proposed in the residential portion of the development will be owned by the Homeowner’s Association and does not satisfy this requirement. These types of public spaces should be included in the mixed use designated area when it develops in accord with Staff’s comments above. • “All mixed-use projects should be directly accessible to neighborhoods within the section by both vehicles and pedestrians.” The proposed development is directly accessible to the adjacent residential neighborhood to the east and the proposed residential neighborhood on the northern portion of this site via an east /west collector street and existing rural homes on the adjacent properties to the north. Pedestrian walkways are provided along the collector streets within the site. • “Street sections consistent with the Ada County Highway District Master Street Map are required within the Unified Development Code.” The proposed preliminary plat depicts collector streets consistent with the Master Street Map. • “Because of the existing small lots within Old Town, development is not subject to the Mixed-Use standards listed herein.” The proposed development is not within Old Town; therefore, this provision is not applicable. In reviewing development applications, the following items will be considered in MU-C areas, per the Comprehensive Plan (pgs. 33-34): “All developments should have a mix of at least three land use types.” The proposed development contains a mix of uses as required (i.e. commercial/retail, healthcare, office, and flex-office). “Developments should comply with the general guidelines for development in all Mixed Use areas.” See analysis above. “Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 20% of the development area at densities ranging from 6 to 15 units/acre.” Residential uses (i.e. patio homes) were recently approved to develop on the adjacent property to the east and multi-family apartments are anticipated to develop further to the east within the MU-C area totaling approximately 65% of the overall MU-C designated area; the overall density of the residential area with the apartments should fall within this range. “Non-residential buildings should be proportional to and blend in with adjacent residential buildings.” The proposed assisted living facility incorporates a hip roof and is a single level similar to proposed adjacent single-family dwellings. The residential portion of the development is separated from the commercial portion by a collector street which Staff feels provides a “break” and doesn’t require the residential and commercial buildings to be “proportional to” and “blend in” with. The 3-story office structure originally proposed near the east boundary of the site adjacent to the future single-level patio homes have been relocated further to the west and will be set back approximately 160’ from the property line which Staff feels is appropriate although Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 449 of 576 Page 10 they will not be proportional nor will they blend in with adjacent residential buildings; therefore, staff recommends the office building is shifted further to the west or to the north next to the street (Narbeth Dr.) to create more of a spatial separation between the uses; or decrease the height of the structure to 2-stories. “Vertically integrated structures are encouraged.” No vertically integrated structures are proposed. “Unless a structure contains a mix of both residential and office, or residential and commercial land uses, a maximum building size should be limited to a 30,000 square-foot building footprint.” All of the structures within the MU-C area are planned to be below 30,000 s.f. “Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks, plazas, outdoor gathering areas, open space, libraries, and schools that comprise a minimum of 5% of the development area are required. Outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count towards this requirement.” These types of spaces and places should be provided. Where the development proposes public and quasi-public uses to support the development above the minimum 5%, the developer may be eligible for additional residential densities and/or an increase to the maximum building footprint.” Not applicable In reviewing development applications, the following items will be considered in MU-I areas, per the Comprehensive Plan (pgs. 33-34): “Land uses within the MU-I areas and adjacent to the SH-16 corridor should be carefully examined for their potential impacts on existing and designated neighborhood centers and commercial activity areas.” The proposed development is the first commercial development in the nearby vicinity; no neighborhood centers are designated or exist in this area. “A traffic impact study may be required for larger developments in these areas.” A TIS was completed for this development and has been reviewed by ACHD and ITD. “Vehicular access points should be prohibited near interchange ramps. Future uses should be planned to integrate with a frontage/backage road type circulation system.” No access points via SH-20/26 are proposed west of the Levi Ave. access near the SH-16 interchange; a collector street frontage road is proposed parallel to SH-20/26. “Any new development at or near MU-I areas should promote a nodal development pattern where buildings are clustered, off-street parking is screened in the rear of the parcel and, where practical, development is inter-connected with adjoining parcels.” Buildings within the MU-I area are clustered but because the area lies between two roadways, the parking cannot be screened from both roadways. “The SH-16/US 20-26 interchange will be one of only two regional gateways to the City of Meridian for travelers coming from north of the Boise River (the other being Linder Road). As such, buildings, landscaping, and other design features at this interchange need to reflect Meridian’s heritage, quality, and character.” “Design of the SH-16/US 20-26 interchange and the adjoining land uses must give special consideration to the more scenic and environmentally sensitive area on the north side of US 20-26. The more intensive land uses should be sited on the south side of US 20-26.” Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 450 of 576 Page 11 “Regional ridesharing, park-and-ride and transit transfer facilities are strongly encouraged within the SH-16/US 20-26 MU-I area.” No such uses are proposed but are encouraged. Because this area is rapidly transitioning with urban development, staff recommends the applicant should coordinate with ACHD to determine if a park and ride lot is desired in the area. “The MU-I area at Ustick Road, west of SH-16, should minimize retail and auto-oriented services and transition rapidly from the interchange to the more rural, low density character intended along the county line. (Examples of uses include middle or high schools, post office or library branches, office uses, row house/patio home developments, athletic clubs, etc.)” “The following types of appropriate uses and themes are envisioned at the two interchange locations along SH-16: US 20-26: Commuter Services, Technology/Research, Business Park Ustick Road: Educational, Civic, Light Retail, Residential” Zoning: Based on the analysis above, Staff is of the opinion the requested annexation with the R-8 and C- G zoning districts and proposed development is generally consistent with the MDR, MU-C and MU-I FLUM designations for this site. The proposed annexation area is contiguous to City annexed property to the east and is within the Area of City Impact Boundary. A legal description for the annexation area is included in Section VII.A. The City may require a development agreement (DA) in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. In order to ensure the site develops as proposed with this application, staff recommends a DA as a provision of annexation with the provisions included in Section VIII. B. PRELIMINARY PLAT The proposed preliminary plat consists of (75) building lots, (7) common lots and (4) other lots consisting of (2) private streets, (1) common driveway and (1) future right-of-way on 71.3 acres of land in the R-8 and C-G zoning districts for Pollard Subdivision. Note: Staff has verified that the out-parcel at the southeast corner of the site is an “original parcel of record” as defined by UDC 11-1A-1 per the deed from 1961. As such, it’s not required to be included in the proposed subdivision. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There are no existing structures on this site. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The proposed plat and subsequent development is required to comply with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 for the R-8 district and Table 11-2B-3 for the C-G district. Phasing Plan: The subdivision is proposed to develop in 3 phases as shown on the phasing plan in Section VII.B. Uses proposed in each phase are as follows: Phase 1 will include a 95K square foot (s.f.) medical office, a 12K s.f. convenience store (retail), a 48K s.f. office, a multi-tenant retail/office building, a health club, and a 36K s.f. flex office and is slated to open mid/late 2020. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 451 of 576 Page 12 Phase 2 will include a 10K s.f. emergency room, 50 bed hospital, 50K s.f. medical office building, (23) 48K s.f. offices and a 36K s.f. flex office and is slated to open mid/late 2022. Phase 3 will include 74 conventional single-family residential units and independent living units for 55 and older and an 88-bed assisted living facility – date yet to be determined. Access (UDC 11-3A-3, 11-3H-4): One full access is proposed for the development via N. Levi Ave., a collector street, from W. Chinden Blvd./SH-20/26; direct lot access via W. Chinden Blvd./SH-20/26 is prohibited per UDC 11-3H-4B.2. Another access will be provided from the east via W. Waverton Dr., a collector street, through Fairbourne Subdivision from N. Black Cat Rd.; signalization of the Black Cat/Chinden intersection is expected to be completed in 2020 with the Costco road improvements. Waverton Dr., which parallels SH-20/26 and serves as a backage road, will provide connectivity and access to all properties fronting the state highway in this area in accord with UDC 11-3H-4B.3. Due to the increase in trips generated by the proposed development, ITD is requiring mitigation improvements as detailed in their letter (see Section VII.K), which includes but is not limited to dedication of 12 feet of right-of-way for a westbound right turn lane onto Levi Ave. to be constructed prior to Occupancy and installation of a traffic signal with emergency pre-emption. Old School Lane, an east/west private street that lies on the adjacent properties to the north along the northern boundary of this site currently provides access to the five existing homes on the rim from Pollard Ln. Two private streets (i.e. N. Restucci Ave. and N. Schwenkfelder Ave.) are proposed from internal public streets to Old School Lane for access to these properties; Staff recommends these streets are public, not private, as it’s not the intent of the UDC to approve private streets for single-family developments except in limited circumstances (see UDC 11-3F-1 for more information). Additionally, if and when the properties on the rim re- develop, public street access should be available. The existing easements/right-of-way depicted on Sheet PP1.1 of the plat where the existing public street that serves the Franklin Sensors property to the west is located are required to be vacated. This access was negotiated with ITD with removal of the Pollard/Chinden access. Because the location of this roadway impacts development of this site (i.e. it runs through the middle of the planned medical campus area), the Applicant proposes to relocate the street further to the north. Because Franklin Sensors opposes the relocation of the street, the ACHD Commission will hear this item on April 3rd. A cross-access easement and driveway should be depicted on the plat (or granted through a separate recorded easement) to the out-parcel at the southeast corner of the site (#S0421438700) for access in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A.2. Common Driveways (UDC 11-6C-3): One (1) common driveway is proposed on Lot 62, Block 1 for access to Lots 63 and 64, Block 1; comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. An exhibit is required to be submitted with the final plat application that depicts the setbacks, fencing, building envelope and orientation of the lots and structures. Driveways for abutting properties that aren’t taking access from the common driveway(s) should be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line away from the common driveway. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited unless separated by a minimum 5-foot wide landscaped buffer. A perpetual ingress/egress easement for the common driveway(s) is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. A copy of the easement should be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 452 of 576 Page 13 Parking (UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided for single-family detached/attached and age restricted dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit [SFR attached/detached: 1- bedroom requires 2 per unit with at least 1 in an enclosed garage (other space may be enclosed or a minimum 10’ x 20’ parking pad), 2-, 3-, and 4-bedroom units require 4 per unit with at least 2 in an enclosed garage (other space(s) may be enclosed or a minimum 10’ x 20’ parking pad(s); age restricted requires 2 per unit with at least 1 in an enclosed garage for 2+ bedroom units]; parking for the assisted living facility is required based on the number of beds (i.e. 0.5 space per bed), as set forth in UDC Table 11-3C-6. Off-street parking for non-residential uses in commercial districts is based on the square footage of the gross floor area (i.e. 1 space for every 500 s.f.) as set forth in UDC 11-3C-6B.1. Pathways (UDC 11-3A-8): Pathways are required to be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8 with landscaping on either side of the pathway(s) per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C. A 10-foot wide detached multi-use pathway is required within the street buffer along SH-20/26 as proposed. If the pathway will not be located within ITD right-of-way, a public use easement is required; coordinate the details of the easement with Kim Warren, Park’s Department (208-888-3579). A pedestrian circulation plan has been submitted as shown in Section VII.G in an effort to distinguish pedestrian from vehicular use areas for safety. The plan depicts pedestrian walkways to main building entrances from adjacent sidewalks along streets. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): Sidewalks are required to be constructed adjacent to all public streets as set forth in UDC 11-3A- 17. Detached sidewalks are proposed throughout the development in accord with UDC standards. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-17): Parkways are required to be constructed and landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3A- 17E. Eight-foot wide parkways are proposed throughout the development in accord with UDC standards. Landscaping is required to be provided within parkways per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): Street buffer landscaping is required to be provided as set forth in UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the C- G district and 11-2A-6 for the R-8 district and planted in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. A 35-foot wide street buffer is required along W. Chinden Blvd./SH-20/26, an entryway corridor; a 20-foot wide street buffer is required along N. Levi Ln. and W. Waverton Dr., both collector streets; and a 10-foot wide street buffer is required along local streets in the C-G district (buffers are not required along local streets in the R-8 district). The street buffer landscaping depicted on the landscape plan in Section VII.C complies with UDC standards except for the N. Levi Ln. buffer which is short one (1) tree; the landscape plan should be revised to include one additional tree in the buffer. Additionally, the street buffer along SH-20/26 where the hospital is located is required to incorporate noise abatement in the form of a berm or a berm and wall combination that is a minimum of 10 feet higher than the elevation at the centerline of the state highway as set forth in UDC 11-3H-4D; the landscape plan should be revised accordingly and an exhibit should be submitted that depicts the cross-section of the berm and/or wall in relation to the centerline of the highway. The Director may approve alternative compliance as set forth in UDC 11-5B-5 where the Applicant has a substitute noise Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 453 of 576 Page 14 abatement proposal in accord with ITD standards and prepared by a qualified sound engineer per UDC 11-3H-4D.4. Street buffers in residential districts are required to be placed in a common lot and maintained by the Homeowner’s Association; street buffers in commercial districts are required to be placed in a common lot or a permanent dedicated buffer maintained by the property owner of business owner’s association per UDC 11-3B-7C.2. The plat should be revised accordingly. A 25-foot wide landscape buffer to adjoining residential uses is required on the C-G zoned portion of the site to future single-family homes to the east as proposed landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-9C. Because of the high intensity of commercial uses proposed on this site, Staff recommends additional trees (i.e. a mix of evergreen and deciduous) are provided within the landscape buffer to result in barrier that allows trees to touch at maturity in accord with UDC 11-3B-9C.1 in addition to the proposed landscaping and fencing. Qualified Open Space (UDC 11-3G): A minimum of 10% (or 1.8 acres) qualified open space is required to be provided for the single- family residential portion of the development based on 17.97 acres of land per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B. A qualified open space exhibit was submitted as shown in Section VII.D that depicts 2.19 acres (or 12.19%) of open space in excess of UDC standards consisting of parkways along all streets, a collector street buffer and common area in excess of 50’ x 100’ in area. Qualified Site Amenities (UDC 11-3G): A minimum of one (1) qualified site amenity is required to be provided for the single-family residential portion of the development based on 17.97 acres of land per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3C. A children’s play structure is proposed as an amenity in the common area depicted on the qualified open space exhibit as play area. Waterways (UDC 11-3A-6): A waterway runs along the southern portion of this site and is proposed to be piped with this development in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6B.3. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing constructed on the site is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A- 7. A 6-foot tall wood privacy fence is proposed along the north, east and west boundaries of the residential portion of the site in accord with UDC standards. The developer is required to construct fencing abutting pathways and common open space lots in residential areas to distinguish common from private areas; therefore, the landscape plan should depict fencing accordingly. Utilities (UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is proposed in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. Street lighting is required to be installed in accord with the City’s adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. See Section VIII.B below for Public Works comments/conditions. Although this development falls within the North McDermott Trunkshed, mainlines that will provide service do not exist at this time. The Public Works Department has evaluated and conceptually approved the developer’s proposal to temporarily pump wastewater to the adjacent Black Cat Trunkshed to the East. This development shall be required to install the permanent force main (dryline) under Chinden to facilitate an easy transition when service from the McDermott Trunkshed becomes available. This development is subject to paying reimbursement fees for The Oaks Lift Station and Pressure Sewer Reimbursement Agreement, and the West Ada Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 454 of 576 Page 15 School District Reimbursement Agreement for Oaks Lift Station Pump Upgrades pursuant to meridian city code section 8-6-5. Water service being provided by Suez Water Idaho. Applicant will need to work closely with Suez and the City of Meridian to ensure that adequate water flow and pressures can be provide to the development to provide for domestic needs and fire protection. Pressurized Irrigation System (UDC 11-3A-15): An underground pressurized irrigation system is required to be provided for each lot within the development. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City’s adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. Building Elevations (UDC 11-3A-19 | Architectural Standards Manual): Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed 2-4 story hospital, 3-story medical office buildings, 3-story office buildings and 2-story flex-tech buildings as shown in Section VII.F. All single-family attached structures, the assisted living facility and all commercial structures are required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. Submittal and approval of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required prior to issuance of building permits. Single-family detached structures are exempt from this requirement. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Annexation & Zoning with the requirement of a Development Agreement and Preliminary Plat per the conditions included in Section VIII in accord with the Findings in Section IX. B. The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard these items on March 21 and April 18, 2019. At the public hearing on April 18th, the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing: a. In favor: Mike Wardle, Brighton Corporation; Jon Wardle, Brighton Corporation; Tonn Peterson, Ball Ventures Ahlquist; and David Turnbull, Brighton Corporation. b. In opposition: Lucretia Wilson c. Commenting: Robin Hayes, Matthew Restucci, David Dorrough, Keith McGregor, Michelle Dorrough, Karen Garcia; Tamela Paxman; and Denise LaFever. d. Written testimony: Mike Wardle, Brighton Corporation e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: Mark Niemeyer 2. Key issue(s) of public testimony: a. Hayes – Loss of agricultural land due to development; concern pertaining to the general public accessing the private street (Old School Ln.) from the two public stub streets; would like to have water & sewer stubs constructed to the north boundary as close to the first phase as possible, “private street” signage installed at the entrances to Old School Ln., good construction trash & weed control, construction guest management, retention of their address (i.e. Pollard Ln.), construction on the site cease daily by 6:00 pm, snow removal, and noise & light pollution; Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 455 of 576 Page 16 b. Restucci – Remove northern portion of Pollard Ln. once public stub streets are constructed to north boundary with the residential portion of the development; c. Meridian Research Park (development to the west of the subject property) – prefers the current location of the east/west street (i.e. Waverton) in alignment with the main entrance to Franklin Sensors as opposed to the proposed location further to the north; safety concerns pertaining to truck and vehicle traffic going through the hospital site to access Meridian Research Park and extra turning movements – prefer hospital location on the east side of N. Levi Ave.; d. LaFever - Concern pertaining to the impact on taxpayers by possibly having to build a fire station and get equipment sooner than envisioned to service this area and whether the City will purchase land to build or lease the space for the Police substation or if the Developer will be donating the lease space as a quasi-public space for the development; concern pertaining to the intensity of uses planned on this site and associated traffic impacts on SH-20/26 and SH-16; would like to see the 24/7 hours of operation of the hospital go through the CUP process (which it will because a hospital use requires CUP approval in a C-G zoning district). 3. Key issue(s) of discussion by Commission: a. Refinement needed to the site plan for the public/quasi-public spaces provided within the commercial portions of the development referenced in A.1e and f; b. Concern pertaining to receiving a draft staff report from ACHD the day of the meeting on 3/21 and not having adequate time to review the report prior to the hearing; and concern pertaining to outstanding issues noted in their memo that need to be addressed; c. Would like to see revisions to the conceptual development plan as noted in Section VIII before the Commission makes a recommendation to Council on the application – continued public hearing to April 18th in order to receive final ACHD report to address the roadway concerns and effects on adjacent properties, additional time to understand Fire Dept. needs and abilities to service this project and see revisions to the concept plan in response to items noted in Section VIII; d. Timing for construction of Waverton to the east in Fairborne Subdivision from N. Black Cat Rd.; e. Location of a sewer lift station on site; and, f. Location of the east/west collector street (Waverton) and access to the Franklin Sensor/Meridian Research Park property. 4. Commission change(s) to Staff recommendation: a. Modification to condition #A.2c in Section VIII to allow the street buffer to be in a permanent dedicated buffer or a 20-foot wide common lot; b. Modification to condition #A.6 in Section VIII to require the detail of the children’s play equipment to be submitted with the “applicable residential” final plat application; c. Modification to condition #A.3f to allow alternative compliance to be requested to the requirement for a berm or berm/wall combination to be provided within the street buffer as noise abatement adjacent to SH-20/26 if the Applicant has a substitute noise abatement proposal in accord with ITD standards and prepared by a qualified sound engineer as allowed by UDC 11-3H-4D.4; d. Modification to condition #B.1.2 in Section VIII to require the lift station to be located at the northwest corner of the subject property as proposed by the Applicant on a 50’ x 120’ parcel; 5. Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: a. The Commission directed the Applicant to work with their neighbors to the west (i.e. Franklin Sensors) to find a solution on the transportation/road issue as well as provision Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 456 of 576 Page 17 of signage at Levi and the driveway south of the hospital to the west and Waverton to direct truck vs. car traffic to the Franklin Sensors site; and, b. Per the specific use standards, hospitals providing emergency care are required to have direct access on an arterial street – the access proposed will be via a collector street from SH-20/26 from which access is prohibited except at the half mile between section line roads. The City Council should determine if this meets the intent of the requirement; if so, it should be memorialized in the Development Agreement. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 457 of 576 Page 18 VII. EXHIBITS A. Annexation & Zoning Legal Description and Exhibit Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 458 of 576 Page 19 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 459 of 576 Page 20 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 460 of 576 Page 21 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 461 of 576 Page 22 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 462 of 576 Page 23 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 463 of 576 Page 24 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 464 of 576 Page 25 B. Preliminary Plat (date: 1/10/2019) & Phasing Plan Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 465 of 576 Page 26 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 466 of 576 Page 27 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 467 of 576 Page 28 C. Landscape Plan (date: 1/10/2019) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 468 of 576 Page 29 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 469 of 576 Page 30 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 470 of 576 Page 31 D. Qualified Open Space Exhibit (dated: 3/15/19) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 471 of 576 Page 32 E. Site Plan (Revised) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 472 of 576 Page 33 F. Conceptual Building Elevations/Perspectives (dated: 1/10/19) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 473 of 576 Page 34 Medical Office Building: Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 474 of 576 Page 35 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 475 of 576 Page 36 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 476 of 576 Page 37 Photos of Existing Flex-Tech Buildings: Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 477 of 576 Page 38 Conventional Single-Family Home Elevations: Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 478 of 576 Page 39 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 479 of 576 Page 40 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 480 of 576 Page 41 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 481 of 576 Page 42 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 482 of 576 Page 43 G. Pedestrian Circulation Plan & Public/Quasi-Public Spaces & Places (Revised) Note: The public plaza areas depicted are not approved with this application to count toward the minimum 5% required in the Comprehensive Plan. Subsequent review & approval of these areas will take place with review of Certificates of Zoning Compliance for each commercial area. VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS Prior to the City Council hearing, Staff recommends the Applicant revise the conceptual site plan as follows: Depict supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks, plazas, outdoor gathering areas, open space, libraries, and schools that comprise a minimum of 5% of the development area within the mixed use portion of the development as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan (outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count) (see pgs. 24 & 28 of the Comprehensive Plan). The Applicant submitted a revised site plan (included in Section VII.G) that depicts public plaza areas adjacent to collector streets within the development that are not central or connected to adjacent buildings as desired. While the areas depicted are nice entry features, Staff recommends more central, connected plaza areas are planned with development of each commercial area through provisions in the Development Agreement. The office structure proposed near the east boundary of the site should be shifted further to the west or to the north along Narbeth Dr. to create more of a spatial separation between the 3-story structure and future single-level patio homes to the east in Fairbourne Subdivision; or, it should be reduced to a 2-story structure because the structure is not proportional to and will not blend in with the adjacent residential buildings per the following Comprehensive Plan provision: “Non-residential buildings should be proportional Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 483 of 576 Page 44 to and blend in with adjacent residential buildings.” The office structure was shifted further to the west away from the adjacent residential property boundary resulting in a 160’+ separation to future residential uses which Staff feels provides an appropriate separation and negates the need for commercial structures to be proportional and blend with residential buildings. The 3-story office structure proposed near the east boundary of the site adjacent to the future single-level patio homes should be shifted further to the west or to the north next to the street (Narbeth Dr.) to create more of a spatial separation to the future single-level patio homes; or the height of the structure should be reduced to 2-stories in accord with the following Comprehensive Plan provision: “Non-residential buildings should be proportional to and blend in with adjacent residential buildings.” Additionally, if a 4th office building is proposed, it should be depicted on the plan. Same as noted above. Depict the sewer lift station on the subject property instead of on the adjacent property to the west. Condition #B.1.2 below includes requirements for the sewer lift station. The specific use standards for flex space uses prohibit roll-up doors from being visible from a public street (UDC 11-4-3-18); the flex space buildings are proposed to have roll-up doors which will be face the collector street. Staff recommends the buildings be relocated so they each front on public streets (i.e. Waverton & Narbeth) or rotate the buildings 90 degrees with the rear of the structures facing each other; or some other alternative that allows compliance with this standard. The Applicant proposes to construct a berm with a fence on top to screen the roll-up doors from the public street; a cross-section of the berm/wall will be provided with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance/Design Review application that demonstrates the doors will be screened from the public street in accord with this requirement. A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. A Development Agreement (DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. Currently, a fee of $303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six (6) months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the conceptual site plan, conceptual building elevations, preliminary plat, phasing plan, landscape plan, qualified open space exhibit and pedestrian circulation plan included in Section VII and the provisions contained herein. b. All single-family attached homes, the assisted living facility and all commercial structures shall comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. An application for Design Review shall be submitted concurrently with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application and approved prior to submittal of building permit applications. c. A cross-access easement shall be recorded that provides access to the out-parcel (#S0421438700) at the southeast corner of the site and a driveway shall be provided for access and interconnectivity with the subject property in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A.2. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 484 of 576 Page 45 d. A 10-foot wide multi-use pathway shall be constructed within the street buffer along the W. Chinden Blvd./SH-20/26 in accord with UDC 11-3H-4C.4; landscaping shall be provided along either side of the pathway as set forth in UDC 11-3B-12C. e. Buildings within the commercial portions of the development shall be arranged to create some form of common, usable area, such as a plaza or green space as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan for mixed use designated areas (see pg. 23 of the Comprehensive Plan). f. Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks, plazas, outdoor gathering areas, open space, libraries, and schools that comprise a minimum of 5% of the development area shall be provided within the mixed use portion of the development as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan (outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count) (see pgs. 24 & 28 of the Comprehensive Plan). More central, connected plaza/outdoor gathering areas should be planned adjacent to buildings with development of each commercial area; those depicted on the site plan in Section VII.G do not all qualify toward the minimum requirements. g. Buildings, landscaping, and other design features near the SH-16/SH-20/26 interchange need to reflect Meridian’s heritage, quality, and character as one of the regional gateways to the City of Meridian in accord with the Comprehensive Plan (see pg. 33). 2. The preliminary plat included in Section VII.B, shall be revised as follows: a. If solid fencing is proposed on Lot 61, Block 1 adjacent to the common driveway on Lot 62, Lot 62 shall be widened an additional 5 feet to accommodate the required 5-foot wide landscape buffer as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D.5. b. The private streets (i.e. N. Restucci Ln. and N. Schwenkfelder Ln.) depicted stubbing at the north boundary shall be public. c. Depict a 20-foot wide common lot or a permanent dedicated buffer for the street buffer along W. Waverton Dr. on Lot 24, Block 1 in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.2ab. d. Depict street buffers along W. Chinden Blvd./SH-26/26, N. Levi Ave., and W. Waverton Dr. in the C-G district on a common lot or on a permanent dedicated buffer in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.2b. e. Depict street sections on the plat. f. Depict lot square footage for each residential lot. g. Depict a cross-access easement to the out-parcel at the southeast corner of the site in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A.2. 3. The landscape plan included in Section VII.C shall be revised as follows: a. If solid fencing is proposed on Lot 61, Block 1 adjacent to the common driveway on Lot 62, Lot 62 shall be widened an additional 5 feet to accommodate the required 5-foot wide landscape buffer as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D.5. b. The private streets (i.e. N. Restucci Ln. and N. Schwenkfelder Ln.) depicted stubbing at the north boundary from W. Tree Crest St. shall be public. c. One (1) additional tree shall be added within the street buffer along N. Levi Ave. in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.3b. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 485 of 576 Page 46 d. Include additional trees (i.e. a mix of evergreen and deciduous) within the landscape buffer to adjoining residential uses from commercial uses along the east boundary to result in a barrier that allows trees to touch at maturity in accord with UDC 11-3B-9C.1. e. Depict fencing on building lots adjacent to common open space lots in residential areas to distinguish common from private areas as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7A.7. f. Depict noise abatement within the street buffer along SH-20/26 adjacent to the hospital in the form of a berm or a berm and wall combination that is a minimum of 10 feet higher than the elevation at the centerline of the state highway as set forth in UDC 11-3H-4D; include a cross-section of the berm and/or wall in relation to the centerline of the highway as a detail on the plan or a separate exhibit. The Director may approve alternative compliance as set forth in UDC 11-5B-5 where the Applicant has a substitute noise abatement proposal in accord with ITD standards and prepared by a qualified sound engineer per UDC 11-3H-4D.4. 4. Direct lot access via W. Chinden Blvd./SH-20/26 is prohibited per UDC 11-3H-4B.2. 5. The existing easements/right-of-way noted on Sheet PP1.1 of the plat shall be vacated prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 6. Submit a detail of the children’s play equipment with the applicable residential final plat application. 7. An exhibit is required to be submitted with the final plat application for lots accessed by the common driveway on Lot 62, Block 1 that depicts the setbacks, fencing, building envelope and orientation of the lots and structures. Driveways for abutting properties that aren’t taking access from the common driveway(s) should be depicted on the opposite side of the shared property line away from the common driveway. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited unless separated by a minimum 5-foot wide landscaped buffer. 8. A perpetual ingress/egress easement for the common driveway(s) shall be filed with the Ada County Recorder, which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. A copy of the easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat. 9. A 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement is required to be submitted to the Planning Division for the multi-use pathway within the street buffer along SH-20/26 if the pathway is located outside of ITD’s right-of-way; coordinate the details of the easement with Kim Warren, Park’s Department. 10. Signage for addressing needs to be provided at the public street for homes on Lots 63 & 64, Block 1 accessed by the common driveway for emergency wayfinding purposes. 11. All single-family attached structures, the assisted living facility and all commercial structures are required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. Submittal and approval of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required prior to issuance of building permits. Single-family detached structures are exempt from this requirement. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 A street light plan will need to be included in the final plat application. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the City's Design Standards. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 486 of 576 Page 47 1.2 Although this development falls within the North McDermott Sewer Trunkshed, mainlines that will provide service do not exist at this time. The Public Works Department has evaluated and conceptually approved the developer’s proposal to temporarily pump wastewater to the adjacent Black Cat Trunkshed to the East. The permanent Lift Station site, contemplated in the Meridian Wastewater Master Plan, is located north of the subject development and on the west side of N. Pollard Lane. However, the developer is proposing to locate the Lift Station in the northwest corner of the proposed development, which shall be required. The developer shall be required to work out the final design location with the Public Works Department, and deed the necessary land (a 50’ x 120’ parcel) to the city with completion of the station. The Lift Station shall be satisfactorily completed and accepted prior to the first occupancy permit being issued within the development. This development shall be required to install the permanent forcemain (dryline) under Chinden to facilitate an easy transition when service from the McDermott Trunkshed becomes available. 1.3 This development is subject to paying reimbursement fees for The Oaks Lift Station and Pressure Sewer Reimbursement Agreement, and the West Ada School District Reimbursement Agreement for Oaks Lift Station Pump Upgrades (currently under development) pursuant to meridian city code section 8-6-5 1.4 Water service being provided by Suez Water Idaho. Applicant will need to work closely with Suez and the City of Meridian to ensure that adequate water flow and pressures can be provide to the development to provide for domestic needs and fire protection. 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with Suez Water Idaho, and the Meridian Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code (MCC), the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public sewer mains outside of public right of way. The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year- round source of water (MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system may be necessary. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 487 of 576 Page 48 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at (208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated, and road base approved by the Ada County Highway District prior to issuance of building permits. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 488 of 576 Page 49 2.20 At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/161916/Page1.aspx D. POLICE DEPARTMENT http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/162994/Page1.aspx E. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO (COMPASS) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/163824/Page1.aspx F. SETTLER’S IRRIGATION DISTRICT Plans must be submitted to Settler’s Irrigation District for comment and review prior to construction. G. NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT (NMID) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/162719/Page1.aspx H. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT (CDHD) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink8/DocView.aspx?id=161962&dbid=0 I. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (DEQ) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/162389/Page1.aspx Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 489 of 576 Page 50 J. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT (ACHD) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink8/DocView.aspx?id=164957&dbid=0 K. IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT (ITD) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/163888/Page1.aspx L. VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT (VRT) Per an email from Brian Parker, VRT, on March 15, 2019, VRT has no plans to serve SH-16 or W. Chinden Blvd. west of Linder Rd. IX. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone (UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission, the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone, the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Commission finds the Applicant’s proposal to annex and develop the subject 71.3 acre property with R-8 and C-G zoning is consistent with the associated FLUM designations for this property. (See section V above for more information.) 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment and development complies with the purpose statements of the residential and commercial districts in that it will provide for a range of housing opportunities and retail and service needs for the community consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare as the proposed residential and commercial uses should be compatible with adjacent existing and future residential and commercial uses in the area. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including, but not limited to, school districts; and The Commission finds City services are available to be provided to this development. 5. The annexation (as applicable) is in the best interest of city. The Commission finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 490 of 576 Page 51 B. Preliminary Plat (UDC 11-6B-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat, the decision making body shall make the following findings: (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15- 2005) 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; (Ord. 08-1372, 7-8-2008, eff. 7-8-2008) The Commission finds the proposed plat is generally in conformance with the UDC if the Applicant complies with the conditions of approval in Section VIII. 2. Public services are available or can be made available ad are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Commission finds public services can be made available to the subject property and will be adequate to accommodate the proposed development. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; The Commission finds the proposed plat is in substantial conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City’s CIP. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Commission finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The Commission finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. (Ord. 05-1170, 8- 30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) The Commission is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that need to be preserved with this development. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 491 of 576 1 Pollard Subdivision (aka Central Valley Plaza) •ACHD Commission Approval on 4/10 •P&Z Commission Approval on 4/18 •Overview CENTRAL VALLEY PLAZA (APPROVED BY ACHD COMMISSION 4.10.2019) TREE CREST TREE CREST RE S T U C C I SC H W E N K F E L D E R WAVERTON (Commercial) LE V I ( C o l l e c t o r ) NARBETH (Commercial) PO L L A R D ( I n d u s t r i a l ) OLD SCHOOL LN (pvt) CHINDEN –20/26 WAVERTON (Collector) 2 To Black Cat & Tree Farm 3 Waverton Tree Farm 20 / 26 Le v i Bl a c k C a t 4 RESTUCCI ERNEST/ PANTERHAYES SCHWENKFELDER POLLARD SUBDIVISION (APPROVED BY ACHD 4.10.2019) FR A N K L I N S E N S O R Extend to Pollard Public Street Stubs 5 DESIGN ISSUES 1ST “BULLET” PUBLIC/QUASI-PUBLIC SPACES *** *CUP *CZC/DR 6 4-11-19 Concept Condition A.1.f PRIOR CONCEPT DESIGN ISSUES 2nd & 3rd “BULLETS” EASTERN OFFICE BUILDING REVISION 160’ FAIRBOURNE SUBDIVISION 20’ COMMON LOT 90’ 7 8 DESIGN ISSUES 4th “BULLET” / Cond. A.2.g SEWER LIFT STA / CROSS ACCESS SEWER LIFT STATION CROSS ACCESS OPTIONS DESIGN ISSUES 5th “BULLET” FLEX ROLL-UP DOOR SCREENING (TO BE ADDRESSED AT CZC/DR) PRIOR CONCEPT REVISION 9 10 Item No. 5 a.Access to the west b.Future Hospital Access to 20/26 via Levi Lane 11 Request Approval Pollard Subdivision (aka Central Valley Plaza) H-2019 -0021 12 13 14 PO L L A R D LE V I OLD SCHOOL FR A N K L I N SE N S O R 15 16 CENTRAL VALLEY PLAZA (APPROVED BY ACHD COMMISSION 4.10.2019) TREE CREST TREE CREST RE S T U C C I SC H W E N K F E L D E R WAVERTON (Commercial) LE V I ( C o l l e c t o r ) NARBETH (Commercial) PO L L A R D ( I n d u s t r i a l ) OLD SCHOOL LN (pvt) CHINDEN –20/26 WAVERTON (Collector) 17 To Black Cat & Tree Farm ACCESS DISCUSSIONS –HOSPITAL DEVELOPER (BVA) AND FRANKLIN SENSOR . License Agreement between BVA and FS for use by service vehicles . Implementation following hospital construction LE V I PO L L A R D WAVERTON 18 19 ASSISTED/INDEPENDENT LIVING SINGLE FAMILY MEDICAL/HOSPITAL COMPLEX TECH-FLEX CENTRAL VALLEY PLAZA OFFICE/RETAIL 20 21 22 4.11.19 Concept 23 NW SW NE SE Central Valley Plaza Misrepresentations Myth: Franklin Sensors can’t build anymore •Stated at the P&Z meeting on March 21st, 39:28: “They cannot build out today.” •Stated at the ACHD meeting on April 10th, 59:15: “They can’t build any more without the permanent access and the utilities that we are bringing to their site.” •Truth: January 11, 2017, two buildings were approved for Meridian Research Park. There isn’t any restriction on the number that can be built. Utilities are in place to support 3-6 additional buildings. Myth: Franklin Sensors doesn’t have fire flow •Stated at P&Z meeting on March 21st, 37:15: “They are limited to that first phase. They do not have fire flow.” •Truth: Franklin Sensors has fire flow. Franklin has a very large irrigation well on the property, which feeds a fire hydrant and fire sprinklers. It was all inspected with final approval by Rick Jackson, of the Meridian Fire Department on December 6, 2017. Myth: Franklin Sensors doesn’t have sewer capacity •Stated at P&Z meeting on April 18th, 1:25:00: “They can’t build any more buildings until they have water, sewer and joint trench.” •Truth:Franklin has a very ample supply of water through its high-capacity well. Franklin also has 5X more septic capacity than is currently being used. It is a lot of capacity, because Franklin didn’t expect the city to arrive to quickly. The septic is all approved by the Central District Health. •Franklin also has dry sewer lines that feed out to Pollard, for when sewer becomes available. Myth: Road Must Be Torn Up •Stated at ACHD meeting on April 10, 33:05: “The road that is built there now is basically just a two lane road with borrow ditches and no utilities. It was always going to have to be reconstructed. Even if it remained in the same alignment it would have to be torn up for utilities. •Stated at P&Z meeting on April 18th, 1:26:00: “At the intersection of Pollard and Chinden, it is a two lane, rural intersection, without any improvements or utilities. Always anticipated that roadway, in whatever configuration, would need to be reconstructed in order to provide those.” •Truth:The existing road is 24’ wide. Future development would require 36’ wide. That is sufficient width to put utilities under the future developed road. Myth: Road is centered on our property •Stated at P&Z meeting on April 18th, 1:30:53: “Access provided on Waverton goes into the heart, literally almost the center of their project, so the future project will have the front door. Their particular facility will be part of the whole complex.” •Truth:Only a few buildings can be placed north of Waverton. All the rest will be backtracking after they go around the hospital. Waveron to Meridian Research Park Myth: Franklin Sensors has very narrow drive aisles •Stated at P&Z meeting on April 18th, 1:31:23: “Look at their site plan, they have very tight internal circulation. They have to turn a tight curve and then back into a facility.” •Note: Two P&Z commissioner used this misinformation in the decision. •Truth:Franklin Sensors has very large drive aisles and trucks and cars move in and out of our facility with great ease. Myth: Road was always intended to be temporary •Stated at P&Z meeting on April 18th, 1:26:00: “At the intersection of Pollard and Chinden, it is a two lane, rural intersection, without any improvements or utilities. Always anticipated that roadway, in whatever configuration, would need to be reconstructed in order to provide those.” •Truth: 1.The road is marked with a standard green road sign 2.Communication from Brighton to ACHD, ITD and Franklin stating the road was “permanent” 3.ACHD clarified the new section of Pollard Lane be to ACHD standards to allow the transfer to ACHD 4.Brighton and ACHD contract reference to “Future Local Road”. 5.Brighton adjusted the location 3 times. If it was temporary, there was no need for realignment. 6.Brighton response that the new section of Pollard Lane “should work well with the proposed [Meridian Research Park] business park entrance. Myth: Sign was posted in time for the hearing •Signed Affidavit: Sign affidavit stating the sign was posted 5/10/2019. •Truth: We saw the sign being posted on 5/13/2019. We have witnesses, photographic and video proof. •The file names on the submitted photos state “20190513_180914053_iOS (002)” Conclusion •Do not approve the proposed plan until: •Brighton/BVA proposes a plan that leaves the road in its current location •Franklin Sensors has approved and signed equivalent access. Central Valley Plaza Zoning & Legal Issues Central Valley Plaza Site MU-CMU-I MDR Comprehensive Plan: Future Land Use Designations 2 Central Valley Plaza Site MU-CMU-I MDR Future Land Use: Appropriate Zoning 3 C-G is not an appropriate classification for MU-I or MU-C land use. 4 Current Proposal: C-G Zoning Comprehensive Plan 5 Medical Center on Western half of commercial development 6 Site Layout: Brighton’s Proposal Optional Site Layout 7 Medical Center on Eastern half of commercial development accounts for current layout and infrastructure -Easier right-turn access to the Emergency services -Fits requested zoning -Groups office, flex space with the research park to the West Central Valley Plaza Site MU-CMU-I MDR The Comprehensive Plan Matters 8 The Comprehensive Plan Matters 9 •These are legal issues •Until the legal and proper notice has been given, and the application presented to the public for a Land Use change, the application as it currently stands should be denied. Negative Impacts 05/21/2019 Cost in Injuries, Lives and Damage •Added Pedestrian Traffic –Walking is the main form of exercise for the elderly •Future Meridian Research park will have 500 commuting employees and some delivery traffic. •More turns = more accidents (Of precrash events: 22.2% for left turns 1.2% right) (NHTSA) Access to Building Franklin Sensors Current Building Location. •As-built road: One corner and a straight shot in. •Proposed Modification: Requires navigating 2 3-corner jumbles •Per Specific Use Standards Hospitals Providing Emergency Care must have Direct access to an arterial street -Staff Report Section V -A Cost in Real Estate Value Access is the #1 factor in determining land value. -According to Ryan experienced Appraiser and owner of Zac Ryan Appraisal Services https://rethinkrural.raydientplaces.com/blog/15-ways-an-appraiser-determines-land-value 5 Preferred Entrance •Direct Access off of a Main Road •Attractive Entrance $300K /acre $200K /acre $200K /acre$200K /acre Example #1: Business Park Note: Perceived “Goodness” of each piece of land depends on how you access it. 6 $1.95/ft $3.50/ft$3.00/ft Example #2: Light Industrial Note: Perceived “Goodness” of each piece of land depends on how you access it. 7 $9.75/ft $12/ft Example #3: Neighborhood Business Note: Perceived “Goodness” of each piece of land depends on how you access it. 8 Meridian Research Park Property Value According to a local commercial real estate expert regarding this proposal: •“This negatively effects the value of Meridian Research Park’s property” Conclusion Do not approve the proposed plan until: •Brighton/BVA proposes a plat that leaves the road in it’s current location Or •Meridian Research Park has approved and signed equivalent access 1 ITD and Martom GROUP/BRIGHTON CORP AGREEMENT AGREEMENT: In 2013 Martom Group/Brighton Corp entered into an agreement to build the the New Section of Pollard Lane (which is referred in the contract as “Future Local Road”.) A) Design had to be approved by ACHD B) Construction needed to be built to ACHD standards for a permanent road C) Once built the New Section of Pollard Lane was to be deeded to ACHD as a permanent public road D) Martom had an obligation to “complete construction and obtain ACHD acceptance of the Future Local Road [the New Section of Pollard Lane] no later than December 31, 2016”. PAYMENT:In exchange, Martom/Brighton Corp would receive compensation for the land, road construction, and administrative settlement BUILT:In accordance with the contract the road was built in approximately November of 2016.2 PERMANENT ROAD SIGNAGE ADDED •Green sign means it is a public road. •It is well understood that public roads are not uprooted without compelling public reasons. •In contrast private roads have blue signs, or other signs. 3 COMMUNICATION FROM BRIGHTON GROUP •April 16, 2016 Brighton adjusted the location of the road because they understood it was to be permanent –otherwise they should have just built it in the original location. •June 15, 2016 Brighton Group refers to road as “Permanent” and confirms that it will be deeded to ACHD. •November 16, 2016 Brighton Group confirms that the alignment of the road “should work well with the proposed business park entrance.” 4 NEW SECTION OF POLLARD LANE Right of Way Recorded by ACHD Note: This is not an engineering drawing. Locations of roads and buildings are approximate and for illustrative purposes only.5 Historical Road Location –But It is now Vacated PAPERWORK •The road was built in the correct location •Applicant proposes that because of the paperwork error that this is not a public road •Paperwork errors do not negate the obligations of the contract 6 RECOMMENDATION Do not approve the proposed plan until: •Brighton/BVA proposes a plan that leaves the road in its current location OR •Franklin Sensors has approved and signed a plan for equivalent access. 7 Meridian Research Park Vision 12 Upscale Office Buildings Buildings Ranging in Size From 5,000 to 26,000 Square Feet A Total of 100,000 Square feet of Class A Office Space Office Space for 500+ Employees Ample Landscaping Excellent Circulation and Traffic Flow Aligned with Access Road Community Asset 1 Meridian Research Park –First Building An Upscale Office Building Extra Large Windows Provide a Stately Appearance Use of Decorative EFIS Provides Tasteful Accents 2 Meridian Research Park Traffic Flow Design Drive Aisles and Entrances are Far Above the 24’ Minimum 35’ and 42’ Wide Drive Aisles 50’ Wide Entrance Entrance is Aligned with Access Road 3 Alignment Set April 2013 Feb. 2016 Approved Location for Building Note: This is not an engineering drawing. Locations of roads and buildings are approximate and for illustrative purposes only. Meridian Research Park Entrance Historical Road Location –But It is now Vacated 4 Summary of Road Alignments Alignment Set April 2013 Feb. 2016 Approved Location for Building Sept. 2016 Approved Location for Building Jan. 2017 Approved Location and Location Where Building Was Constructed Alignment Set April 2016 Note: This is not an engineering drawing. Locations of roads and buildings are approximate and for illustrative purposes only. Alignment Corrected with 3rd Ada County Approval 5 Historical Road Location –But It is now Vacated Summary of Road Alignments Alignment Set April 2013 Feb. 2016 Approved Location for Building Sept. 2016 Approved Location for Building Jan. 2017 Approved Location and Location Where Building Was Constructed Alignment Set April 2016 New Proposed Alignment Note: This is not an engineering drawing. Locations of roads and buildings are approximate and for illustrative purposes only.6 Historical Road Location –But It is now Vacated The Proposed Layout is Not Ideal City Development -- Access and Traffic Flow are Compromised Many other Developments in Meridian Are Similar -- Paramount Subdivision 8 Hypothetical Hospital Hypothetical Re-Routed Road Hypothetical Change to Paramount Access (hopefully you would ask applicant to move the hospital, especially if it were feasible) 9 Site Layout Options 10 West East L e v i L a n e Pollard Lane A Modified Site Offers an Improved Layout Groups Office Buildings Keeps Traffic Away from Residential Areas Allows Right Hand Turn into Emergency Room Maintains Hospital Cluster as a Group Optimizes Traffic Flow for All Buildings Groups Medical Buildings Conclusion Meridian Research Park went back to Ada County Board 3 times to maintain alignment between the entrance and the new section of Pollard Lane –because we wanted it done right. It has been understood by all parties (ITD, ACHD, Meridian Research Park, Brighton, etc.) that the new section of Pollard Lane is a public road. Moving public roads without a compelling public need is a terrible precedent. There isn’t a compelling reason to move the road. An improved site design can resolve all concerns and maintain all of same buildings and same functions –it will be here for a long, long time. 12 Do not approve the proposed plan until: •Brighton/BVA proposes a plan that leaves the road in its current location •Franklin Sensors has approved and signed equivalent access. City Council Meeting May 21, 2019 Pollard Subdivision AZ, PP H- 2019-0021 Denise LaFever 6706 N Salvia Way, Meridian, ID Central Valley Plaza aka Pollard Subdivsion •The Central Valley Plaza is planned for the corner of Chinden Boulevard and Highway 16. •Author:KTVB •Published:9:49 AM MDT September 25, 2018 •Updated:6:51 PM MDT September 25, 2018 •“Ball Ventures Ahlquist Development and Brighton Corporation announced the plaza will be built north of Meridian at the corner of Chinden Boulevard and Highway 16, which they dubbed "the fastest-growing area of Idaho.“” •“The project includes plans for a medical campus with a surgery center, free-standing emergency department and a 90,000 square foot medical office building. BVA and Brighton will partner with HCAHealthcare, which currently operates West Valley Medical Center and the Eastern Idaho Regional Medical Center.” Noted Space Available in excess of 86,000 SF just on second & third floor. Available Space 45,000+/-SF Available Space 36,000 SF Page 14 Staff Report – “High Intensity of Commerci al Uses proposed. ” Mixed Use Interchange (MU-I) Zoning Limited Office District (L-O) or M-E Hospital not permitted in M-E. A 24/7 hospital emergency facility doesn’t meet limited hours of operation FLUM MU-I no C-G. Office buildings & Office flex building all in excess of 30,000 SF Site doesn’t meet 20% residential. Floating to adjacent property. 5/31/05 •6/22/06 7/18/18 Increasing Intensity of Use & Shifting Burdens to the Taxpayer •Fire Service page 2 -An aerial device is required. Impact fees don’t cover equipment costs. •No impact fees collected on State Highways. The intensity and use of this proposed development above what the FLUM envisioned will impact access and traffic. This will further contribute to congestions and shift the burden to the future taxpayers. MU-I was intended to protect the immediate vicinity of the interchange from traffic conflict and shift the high traffic generating uses away. Adjacent business was required to comply. Development should be required to expand road or provide other alternatives to alleviate their impact. •Water page 2 -Water flow and pressures not determined. •Police officers are often present in an emergency room. Providing lease space for housing a police substation benefits hospital while profiting from lease in expected expensive lease space. E IDIANDAHO� CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 12 A Project File Name/Number: Item Title: Public Works Budget Amendment for FY19 Meeting Notes: In the Amount of $208,190 for Well 20B Rehabilitation I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 12.A . Presenter: Kyle Radek Estimated Time for P resentation: Title of I tem - Public Works: B udget Amendment for F Y 2019 in the Amount of $208,190 for Well 20B Rehabilitation (Action Item) Eac h year, Water O peratio ns b udgets and p lans fo r well assessments whic h typ ically includ e removing the p umps, assessing components , c o nfirming aq uifer cond ition and c o mp leting routine maintenanc e. W hen the Well 20B pump ing sys tem was pulled , s ignificant is s ues were fo und that needed ad d res s ed . It has been determined that c ertain well c o mp o nents mus t b e replac ed with stainless s teel materials and the well must be d is infec ted. It is important to c o mp lete this work quickly fo r this well to s upport peak s ummer water demand . C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate B A and P W Memo C over Memo 5/15/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate P ublic Works.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/15/2019 - 1:20 P M P ublic Works.F ields, J enny Approved 5/15/2019 - 2:38 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 492 of 576 O o ° 3 O N � n 0 a v h rD O 3 n CQ m X M 3 a c m � v V' tel. LM O1 O1 O1 Q1 - 01 O1 O1 - 01 01 01 - 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LU w w w w w w w w w w w w A A A A A A A A A A A A A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 yo r �' r, r0 2 n rt n v n rt v c O O O O Fl O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N W N W N W N W N W N W N 00 N W N 00 N 00 N 00 N 00 N CO Vn iA iA N i/) in 4/ V) VT i T V/ VT -LA 0 T CS C � O 'm Q � OQ o .g 0 R. fD C+7 H r T O ci 0 N n Et E o O O O 7 N 0 0 in 0 1p J 3 (D O 7 6) 0 s m 01 Q1 Q1 Ol Ol O1 Q1 O1 0 o O O o O o 0 LU w w w w w w w w w w LD LD W w w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A A A A A A A A N O N O N O N O w N . N . N Ul W N N A O 0 01 O A yo r �' r, r0 2 n rt n v n rt v c O O O O Fl O O O O N 00 N 00 N 00 N 00 N CO N 00 N W N 00 m v T C 0 v rt O m (> > -• < \ d O� .Z1 N D o (D q N (�D y 'D LD O O O fD O O O n (' (p mN (D G) r O o n n � � a -! O O 7 N m Q (D Q- m -n N O o w CD C Q. (Q 3 -! D T 0 (D St o �y�� otic o n3 S fD 3 (D ID -n D t 'o a m —n =" D o'^ N An a ~ '< �• � N c 3 O A yo r �' r, r0 2 n rt n v n rt v c v c \mac luo l9 • El 0 -i�GC v rt O O d I� N rn N N -- ._ j O W y O LD O O O G) r O o n n � � a -! O O 7 N m Q (D Q- m -n N O o w CD C Q. (Q -! D rt fD � S St Q n3 S 3 (D t 'o a m —n =" O N A T cr luo l9 (fl v rt d lD \�rt j y Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 494 of 576 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 495 of 576 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 496 of 576 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 497 of 576 EIDIANC-- H� CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 13 A Project File Name/Number: Item Title: Ordinance No. 19-1826 An Ordinance (H-2019-0119- ICOM Parking Expansion) For Annexation Of A Parcel Of Land Being APN: 51118417268 And The Adjacent Rights -Of -Ways Of South Locust Grove & East Central Drive, Located In The Northeast 1/40f The Southeast 1/4 Of Section 28, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, As Described In Attachment "A" And Annexing Certain Lands And Territory, Situated In Ada County, Idaho, And Adjacent And Contiguous To The Corporate Limits Of The City Of Meridian As Requested By The City Of Meridian; Establishing And Determining The Land Use Zoning Classification Of 2.91 Acres Of Land From R6 To C -G (General Retail And Service Commercial) Zoning District In The Meridian City Code; Providing That Copies Of This Ordinance Shall Be Filed With The Ada County Assessor, The Ada County Recorder, And The Idaho State Tax Commission, As Required By Law; And Providing For A Summary Of The Ordinance; And Providing For A Waiver Of The Reading Rules; And Providing An Effective Date. Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 13.A . Presenter: Chris J ohnson Estimated Time for P resentation: 2 minutes Title of I tem - Ordinance No. 19- 1826: An Ordinance (H-2019-0119– IC O M Parking Expansion) For Annexation Of A Parcel Of L and Being AP N: S 1118417268 And T he Adjacent Rights-Of-Ways O f South L ocust Grove & E ast Central D rive, L ocated In T he Northeast ¼ Of T he S outheast ¼ Of S ection 28, Township 3 North, Range 1 E ast, Boise M eridian, Ada County, Idaho, As Described In Attachment “A” And Annexing C ertain Lands And Territory, S ituated In Ada C ounty, Idaho, And Adjacent And Contiguous To T he C orporate L imits O f T he C ity Of M eridian As Requested By T he C ity Of M eridian; Establishing And D etermining T he L and Use Zoning Classification O f 2.91 Acres Of Land F rom R6 To C-G (G eneral Retail And S ervice Commercial) Zoning District In T he M eridian C ity C ode; Providing T hat Copies Of T his Ordinance S hall B e F iled With T he Ada County Assessor, T he Ada C ounty Recorder, And T he Idaho S tate Tax C ommission, As Required B y Law; And Providing F or A Summary Of T he Ordinance; And P roviding F or A Waiver Of T he Reading Rules; And P roviding An Effective D ate. I C O M P arking Expansion A nnexation Ordinance C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate I C O M Parking Ordinance Ordinance 5/15/2019 I C O M Parking - Exhibit A E xhibit 5/15/2019 I C O M Parking - Exhibit B E xhibit 5/15/2019 I C O M Parking S ummary Ordinance 5/15/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate L egal.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/15/2019 - 2:49 P M L egal.A lbertson, Michelle Approved 5/15/2019 - 3:13 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 498 of 576 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2019-042912 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=4 LISA BATT 05/22/2019 10:36 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE 1.0 I- I &WSJ guy 101.117 I Iffel 19 7101/ 101M 009ML0E i►�� BY THE CITY COUNCIL- BERNT, :O. ROBERTSMILAM, PALMER, LITTLE AN ORDINANCE (H-2019-01.1.9— ICOM PARKING EXPANSION) FOR ANNEXATION OF A PARCEL OF LAND BEING APN: 51118417268 AND THE ADJACENT RIGHTS -OF - WAYS OF SOUTH LOCUST GROVE & EAST CENTRAL DRIVE, LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST'/40F THE SOUTHEAST/40F SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AS DESCRIBED IN ATTACHMENT "A" AND ANNEXING CERTAIN LANDS AND TERRITORY, SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; ESTABLISHING AND DETERMINING THE LAND USE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 2.91 ACRES OF LAND FROM R6 TO C -G (GENERAL RETAIL AND SERVICE COMMERCIAL) ZONING DISTRICT IN THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FORA SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. That the following described land as evidenced by attached Legal Description herein incorporated by reference as Exhibit "A" are within the corporate limits of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for annexation and re -zoning by the owner ofsaid property, to -wit: Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, LLC. SECTION 2. That the above-described real property is hereby annexed and re -zoned from R6 to C -G (General Retail and Service Commercial) zoning district in the Meridian City Code. SECTION 3. That the City has authority pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and zone said property. SECTION 4. That the City has complied with all the noticing requirements pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and re -zone said property. SECTION 5. That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps, and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 6. All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. ANNEXATION ORDINANCE — ICOM PARKING EXPANSION (112019-0119) Page 1 of 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 — Page 499 of 576 SECTION 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. SECTION 8. The Clerk of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a map prepared in a draftsman manner, including the lands herein rezoned, with the following officials of the County of Ada, State of Idaho, to -wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho. SECTION 9. That pursuant to the affiimative vote of one-half (1 /2) plus one (1) of the Members of the full Council, the rule requiring two (2) separate readings by title and one (1) reading in full be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval and publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of , 2019 APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD ATTEST: V�QpRA1 cu gUCGST �'itv�� co C) jD1AN�. S JO+kON, CITY C SE 5A_ AL STATE OF IDAHO, ss: County of Ada ) On this 21 day of Q 2019, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State personally appeared TAMMY de W ERD and Chri5Tbhn,.56Y1 , known to me to be the Mayor and C m Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above CHARLENE WAY OMQ (SEfMMISSION #67390 NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAIJO NOTARY PUBLICRESIDING AT: oQ,,r�aj-kz STATE OF IDAHO �_P,��r, My COMMISSION EXPIRES 3/28/22 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES` 70 00 a ANNEXATION ORDINANCE — ICOM PARKING EXPANSION (H 2019-0119) Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A ICOM Parking Expansion – H-2019-0019 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 501 of 576 EXHIBIT B ICOM Parking Expansion – H-2019-0019 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 502 of 576 NOTICE AND PUBLISHED SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO I.C. § 50-901(A) CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 19-1826 PROVIDING FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE An Ordinance of the City of Meridian granting annexation of a parcel of land being APN: S1118417268 and the adjacent rights -of -ways of South Locust Grove & E. Central Drive, located in a portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 18, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise, Ada County, Idaho. This parcel contains 2.91 acres more or less. Also, these parcels are SUBJECT TO all easements and rights-of-way of record or implied. As surveyed in attached exhibit `B" and is not based on an actual field survey. A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. This ordinance shall become effective on the day of -M w 12019. Ov Cayor an ty Councii' Ml By: Chris Johnson, Interim City Clerk First Reading: 5" 2- , I - I Adopted after first reading by suspension of the Rule as allowed pursuant to Idaho Code §50-902: YES _ NO Second Reading: Third Reading: STATEMENT OF MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY AS TO ADEQUACY OF SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 19-1826 The undersigned, William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that he is the legal advisor of the City and has reviewed a copy of the attached Ordinance No. 19-1826 of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and has found the same to be true and complete and provides adequate notice to the public pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-901A (3). DATED this 2-13' day of Ho 11 52019. William. L.M. Nary City Attorney ORDINANCE SUMMARY — ICOM Parking Expansion (H-2019-0119) �/rE IDIZ IANC-- �J CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 13 B Project File Name/Number: Item Title: First Reading of - Ordinance No. 19-1527 An Ordinance To Amend The Municipal Code Of The City Of Meridian, County Of Ada, State Of Idaho, Amending Title 10, Chapter 7, Section 12(E)(2), Meridian City Code, Known As The Meridian Impact Fee Ordinance Fee Schedule; To Provide For An Amendment To The Police, Fire, And Parks And Recreation I mpact Fee Schedules; And Providing An Effective Date. Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 13.B . Presenter: Chris J ohnson Estimated Time for P resentation: 2 minutes Title of I tem - F irst Reading of Ordinance No. 19- 1827: An O rdinance To Amend T he M unicipal Code Of T he City O f M eridian, C ounty Of Ada, S tate Of Idaho, Amending Title 10, C hapter 7, S ection 12(E )(2), M eridian C ity C ode, Known As T he M eridian Impact F ee Ordinance Fee S chedule; To P rovide F or An Amendment To T he P olice, F ire, And Parks And Recreation Impact F ee Schedules; And P roviding An E ffective D ate. I mpact F ee Ordinance R evisions C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate I mpact Fee Ordinance Revisions Ordinance 5/15/2019 I mpact Fee Report E xhibit 5/15/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department R eviewer Action D ate L egal.J ohnson, Chris Approved 5/15/2019 - 6:07 P M L egal.A lbertson, Michelle Approved 5/15/2019 - 6:22 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 504 of 576 IMPACT FEE ORDIINANCE AMENDMENT – Page 1 of 4 CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, MILAM, PALMER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 7, SECTION 12(E)(2), MERIDIAN CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE MERIDIAN IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE FEE SCHEDULE; TO PROVIDE FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE POLICE, FIRE, AND PARKS AND RECREATION IMPACT FEE SCHEDULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted in Section 67-8201, et seq., Idaho Code, the City of Meridian ("the City") may impose Impact Fees to fund expenditures by the City Police Department, the City Fire Department and the City Parks and Recreation Department on Capital Improvements needed to serve new growth and development; and WHEREAS, the City retained Raftelis ("Consultant") to analyze and assess new growth and development projections in order to determine the demand for police, fire, and parks and recreation Capital Improvements to accommodate new growth and development in the City and the City's area of city impact; and WHEREAS, the City of Meridian Impact Fee Study and Capital Improvements Plan, prepared by Consultant, dated March 28, 2019 attached hereto as Exhibit “A” (the "Impact Fee Study"), sets forth a reasonable methodology and analysis for determining and quantifying the impacts of various types of new residential and nonresidential Development on the City's police, fire, and parks and recreation Public Facilities; quantifies the reasonable impact of new growth and development on the System Improvements addressed therein; determines the costs necessary to meet demands created by new growth and development; and determines Impact Fees as set forth in this Chapter that are at a level no greater than necessary to defray the cost of planned Capital Improvements to increase the service capacity of the City's existing police, fire, and parks and recreation Public Facilities. The City hereby establishes as the City standards the assumptions and Level of Service standards referenced in the Impact Fee Study as part of the City's current plans for future expansions to the police, fire, and parks and recreation Public Facilities. WHEREAS, based on reasonable methodologies and analyses for determining the impacts of new growth and development on the City's police, fire, and parks and recreation Public Facilities, the Impact Fee Study quantifies the impacts of new growth and development on Public Facilities, and establishes Impact Fees on new growth and development no greater than necessary to defray the cost of Capital Improvements that will increase the service capacity of Public Facilities to serve new growth and development. WHEREAS , in preparing the Impact Fee Study, Consultant reviewed and has relied upon the City's ten (10) year Capital Improvements Plans proposed by the City, and has reviewed and analyzed what elements of new growth and development are or would generate demand for additional police, fire, and parks and recreation Capital Improvements addressed therein; and Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 505 of 576 IMPACT FEE ORDIINANCE AMENDMENT – Page 2 of 4 WHEREAS , all of Capital Improvements planned for and included in the Impact Fee Study, which are to be funded by police, fire, and parks and recreation Impact Fees are directly related to services that the City is authorized to provide, and are services required by the general policies of the City pursuant to resolution, code or ordinance; and WHEREAS , an equitable program for planning and financing Capital Improvements to increase the service capacity of Public Facilities needed to serve new growth and development is necessary in order to promote and accommodate orderly growth and development and to protect the public health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City and City's area of City impact. Such protection requires that the City's police, fire, and parks and recreation Public Facilities be expanded to accommodate new growth and development within the City, and the City's area of city impact. WHEREAS , if the adopted fee is less than the fees proposed under the methodology set forth in the Impact Fee Study, the impact fee eligible portions of adopted Capital Improvement Plan will not be fully funded unless general fund revenue or other income sources are used to fund the difference between the maximum allowable fee and the adopted fee; and WHEREAS , the Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee met on April 12, 2019 and passed a motion to approve the Impact Fee Study and Capital Improvements Plans and recommend that the City Council hold the required public hearing on the Capital Improvements Plans and the updated Impact Fees and WHEREAS , after due and timely notice, the City Council held a public hearing to discuss, review and hear public comments on the proposed Capital Improvements Plans and the revised Impact Fee as recommended by the Development Impact Fee Committee; and WHEREAS , based upon the Impact Fee Study, the testimony at a public hearing and a review of all of the facts and circumstances, in the reasonable judgment of the City Council, the police, fire, and parks and recreation Impact Fees hereby established are at levels no greater than necessary to defray the cost of Capital Improvements directly related to the categories of residential and nonresidential land Development listed herein; and WHEREAS , in adopting the police, fire, and parks and recreation Capital Improvements Impact Fees, the City Council intends and has determined that such Impact Fees are designed to and do address Capital Improvements needs that are brought about by new growth and development, which needs are separate and distinct from the impacts and needs addressed by other requirements of the City's codes and ordinances, and in no circumstance do the Impact Fees set forth herein address the same subjects as other requirements of the City's codes and ordinances for site specific dedications or improvements; and WHEREAS , the police, fire, and parks and recreation Impact Fees to be imposed on new growth and development will be and are hereby legislatively adopted, will be generally applicable to a broad class of property and are intended to defray the projected impacts on such Capital Improvements caused by new growth and development as required by law; and Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 506 of 576 IMPACT FEE ORDIINANCE AMENDMENT – Page 3 of 4 WHEREAS , the Impact Fees adopted hereby shall be collected and accounted for in accordance with Section 67-8201, et seq., Idaho Code; and WHEREAS , the Impact Fees adopted by this Ordinance are fair and rational, charge new growth and development according to new growth and development's impact on the City's police, fire, and parks and recreation Public Facilities and benefit those who pay Impact Fees in a tangible way. BE IT ORDAINED, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: Section 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby affirmed and incorporated herein by this reference as findings of the City Council. Section 2. The Impact Fee Study set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto is hereby approved. Section 3. That Title 10, Chapter 7, Section 12(E)(2) of the Meridian City Code is REPEALED AND REPLACED as follows: 10-7-12: ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS: E. 2. Except for such impact fee as may be calculated, paid and accepted pursuant to an independent impact fee calculation study, the amount of each impact fee shall be as follows effective the _____ day of ____________, 2019: Park and Recreation Facilities Police Facilities Fire Facilities Total Fees Residential (per housing unit) by Square Feet of Climate-Controlled Floor Area 1000 or less $781 $56 $258 $1,095 1001 to 1500 $1,361 $98 $450 $1,909 1501 to 2500 $1,770 $128 $585 $2,483 2501 to 3200 $2,098 $152 $693 $2,943 3201 or more $2,447 $177 $809 $3,433 Nonresidential (per square foot of building) Commercial $0.00 $0.24 $0.64 $0.88 All Other $0.00 $0.05 $0.41 $0.46 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 507 of 576 IMPACT FEE ORDIINANCE AMENDMENT – Page 4 of 4 Section 2: That all other provisions of Title 10, Chapter 7 remain unchanged. Section 3: This Fee Schedule shall be in effect on the ________ day of ________, 2019, which shall be no sooner than thirty (30) days after adoption and publication of this Ordinance. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this _______ day of ________________, 2019. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this ______ day of _________________, 2019. APPROVED: ______________________________ Tammy de Weerd, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Chris Johnson, Interim City Clerk Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 508 of 576 IMPACT FEE ORDIINANCE AMENDMENT – Page 5 of 4 EXHIBIT A Development Impact Fees Study Final Report March 28, 2019 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 509 of 576 227 W. Trade Street, Suite 1400 Charlotte, NC 28202 www.raftelis.com March 28, 2019 Mr. Todd Lavoie Chief Financial Officer City of Meridian 33 E Broadway Ave Meridian, Idaho 83642 Subject: Development Impact Fees Report Dear Mr. Lavoie, Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. (Raftelis) is pleased to provide the 2019 development impact fee update for the City of Meridian. After collaborating with staff and receiving input from the Impact Fee Advisory Committee, Raftelis recommends several changes to improve consistency with Idaho’s enabling legislation, including: • Updated development projections and land use assumptions based on Meridian data • Documentation of current infrastructure standards and projected need for additional facilities • Proportionate fees for two types of nonresidential development and five size thresholds for residential development Our report summarizes key findings and recommendations related to the growth cost of capital improvements, to be funded by development impact fees, along with the need for other revenue sources to ensure a financially feasible Comprehensive Financial Plan. It has been a pleasure working with you and we thank City staff for engaging with quality information and insight regarding best practices for the City of Meridian. Sincerely, Dwayne Guthrie, PhD, AICP Manager Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 510 of 576 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................... 8 Unique Requirements of the Idaho Impact Fee Act .................................................................................................................. 8 Proposed Impact Fees ............................................................................................................................................................... 9 Parks and Recreation Impact Fees ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Citywide Parks ......................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Recreation Buildings ................................................................................................................................................................ 13 Revenue Credit Evaluation ...................................................................................................................................................... 13 Proposed and Current Impact Fees ......................................................................................................................................... 13 Forecast of Revenues for Parks and Recreation ...................................................................................................................... 15 Comprehensive Financial Plan for Parks and Recreation ........................................................................................................ 16 Police Impact Fees ............................................................................................................................................................... 17 Proportionate Share ................................................................................................................................................................ 17 Excluded Costs ......................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Current Use and Available Capacity ........................................................................................................................................ 18 Police Facilities, Service Units, and Standards ......................................................................................................................... 18 Police Infrastructure Needs ..................................................................................................................................................... 18 Revenue Credit Evaluation ...................................................................................................................................................... 19 Police Development Fees ........................................................................................................................................................ 19 Projected Revenue for Police Facilities.................................................................................................................................... 20 Comprehensive Financial Plan for Police ................................................................................................................................. 21 Fire Impact Fees ................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Existing Standards for Fire Facilities ........................................................................................................................................ 22 Fire Infrastructure Needs ........................................................................................................................................................ 23 Revenue Credit Evaluation ...................................................................................................................................................... 24 Current and Proposed Fire Impact Fees .................................................................................................................................. 24 Projected Revenue for Fire Facilities ....................................................................................................................................... 27 Comprehensive Financial Plan for Fire Facilities ..................................................................................................................... 28 Fee Implementation and Administration ............................................................................................................................. 29 Cost of CFP Preparation ........................................................................................................................................................... 29 Development Categories ......................................................................................................................................................... 29 Credits and Reimbursements .................................................................................................................................................. 30 Appendix A: Land Use Assumptions .................................................................................................................................... 31 Service Areas ........................................................................................................................................................................... 31 Summary of Growth Indicators ............................................................................................................................................... 31 Proportionate Share ................................................................................................................................................................ 32 Residential Development and Persons per Housing Unit ........................................................................................................ 33 Demand Indicators by Dwelling Size ....................................................................................................................................... 33 Jobs and Nonresidential Development.................................................................................................................................... 35 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 511 of 576 Executive Summary Impact fees are one-time payments used to construct system improvements that serve multiple development projects or even the entire jurisdiction. By law, impact fees can only be used for capital improvements, not operating or maintenance costs. Impact fees are subject to legal standards that satisfy three key tests: need, benefit, and proportionality . • First, to justify a fee for public facilities, local government must demonstrate a need for capital improvements. • Second, new development must derive a benefit from the payment of the fees (i.e., in the form of public facilities constructed within a reasonable timeframe). • Third, the fee paid should not exceed a development’s proportionate share of the capital cost. As documented in this report, the City of Meridian has complied with applicable legal precedents. Impact fees are proportionate and reasonably related to the capital improvement demands of new development, with the projects identified in this study taken from Meridian’s Comprehensive Financial Plan (CFP). Specific costs have been identified using local data and current dollars. With input from City staff, Raftelis determined service units for each type of infrastructure and calculated proportionate share factors to allocate costs by type of development. This report documents the formulas and input variables used to calculate the impact fees for each type of public facility. Impact fee methodologies also identify the extent to which new development is entitled to various types of credits to avoid potential double payment of growth- related capital costs. The Idaho Development Impact Fee Act (Idaho Code Title 67 Chapter 82) sets forth “an equitable program for planning and financing public facilities needed to serve new growth.” The enabling legislation calls for three integrated products: 1) Land Use Assumptions (LUA) for at least 20 years, 2) Capital Improvements Plan, which the City of Meridian calls Comprehensive Financial Plan (CFP), and 3) Development Impact Fees (DIFs). The LUA (see Appendix A) uses population and housing unit projections provided by City staff. In addition, the CFP and DIF for fire and police facilities require demographic data on nonresidential development. This document includes nonresidential land use assumptions such as jobs and floor area within the City of Meridian, along with service units by residential size thresholds. The CFP and DIF are in the middle section of this report, organized by chapters pertaining to each public facility type (i.e., parks/recreation, police and fire). Each chapter documents existing infrastructure standards, the projected need for improvements to accommodate new development, the updated DIF compared to current fees, revenue projections and funding strategy for growth-related infrastructure, and a CFP listing specific improvements to be completed by the City of Meridian. Unique Requirements of the Idaho Impact Fee Act The Idaho Development Impact Fee Act has several requirements not common in the enabling legislation of other states. This overview summarizes these unique requirements, which have been met by the City of Meridian, as documented in this study. First, as specified in 67-8204(2) of the Idaho Act, “development impact fees shall be calculated on the basis of levels of service for public facilities . . . applicable to existing development as well as new growth and development.” Second, Idaho requires a Capital Improvements Plan (aka CFP in Meridian) [see Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 512 of 576 67-8208]. The CFP requirements are summarized in this report, with more detailed information maintained by City staff responsible for each type of infrastructure funded by impact fees. Third, the Idaho Act states the cost per service unit (i.e., impact fee) may not exceed the cost of growth-related system improvements divided by the number of projected service units attributable to new development [see 67-8204(16)]. Fourth, Idaho requires a proportionate share determination [see 67-8207]. The City of Meridian has complied by considering various types of applicable credits that may reduce the capital costs attributable to new development. Fifth, Idaho requires a Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee established to: a) assist in adopting land use assumptions, b) review the CFP and file written comments, c) monitor and evaluate implementation of the CFP, d) file periodic reports on perceived inequities in implementing the plan or imposing DIFs, and e) advise the governmental entity of the need to update the LUA, CFP and DIF study. Proposed Impact Fees Figure 1 summarizes the methods and cost components used for each type of public facility in Meridian’s 2019 impact fee study. City Council may change the proposed impact fees by eliminating infrastructure types, cost components, and/or specific capital improvements. If changes are made during the adoption process, Raftelis will update the fee study to be consistent with legislative policy decisions. Figure 1: Proposed Fee Methods and Cost Components Figure 2 summarizes proposed 2019 impact fees for new development in the City of Meridian. As discussed in Appendix A, Raftelis recommends that residential fees be imposed by dwelling size, based on climate-controlled space. In contrast, the 2013 study used a “one size fits all” approach, whereby all housing units paid the same DIF. The 2019 size threshold that matches the average fee according to the 2013 method is a residential dwelling with 2501 to 3200 square feet. As shown below, the average fee per dwelling increased from $2,017 in 2013 to $2,943 in 2019, which is an increase of $926 (46%). In addition, the 2019 study recommends nonresidential fees by two general categories, Commercial and All Other types of nonresidential development. Commercial includes all buildings within a shopping center, plus stand-alone retail development and eating/drinking places (i.e., restaurants and bars). All Other includes industrial, warehousing, offices, business services, and personal services (i.e., every type of non-residential development not considered Commercial). The previous study had a single fee for all types of nonresidential development. The average fee per square foot for nonresidential development increased from $0.47 in 2013 to $0.56 in 2019, which is an increase of $0.09 per square foot (20%). Type of Impact Fee Service Area Incremental Expansion (current standards) Cost Allocation Parks and Recreation Facilities Citywide Park Improvements and Recreation Centers Residential Police Facilities Citywide Police Buildings Functional Population and Inbound Vehicle Trips to Nonresidential Development Fire Facilities Citywide Fire Stations and Apparatus Functional Population and Jobs Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 513 of 576 Figure 2: Proposed Impact Fee Schedule Citywide Service Area Park and Recreation Facilities Police Facilities Fire Facilities Proposed Total (2019) Existing Total (2013) Increase or Decrease % Change Residential (per housing unit) by Square Feet of Climate-Controlled Floor Area 1000 or less $781 $56 $258 $1,095 $2,017 ($922) -46% 1001 to 1500 $1,361 $98 $450 $1,909 $2,017 ($108) -5% 1501 to 2500 $1,770 $128 $585 $2,483 $2,017 $466 23% 2501 to 3200 $2,098 $152 $693 $2,943 $2,017 $926 46% 3201 or more $2,447 $177 $809 $3,433 $2,017 $1,416 70% Nonresidential (per square foot of building) Commercial $0.00 $0.24 $0.64 $0.88 $0.47 $0.41 87% All Other $0.00 $0.05 $0.41 $0.46 $0.47 ($0.01) -2% Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 514 of 576 Parks and Recreation Impact Fees The 2019 updated impact fee for parks and recreation facilities will enable Meridian to maintain current infrastructure standards for improved acres of parks and floor area of recreation buildings. All parks and recreation facilities included in the impact fees have a citywide service area. Cost components are allocated 100% percent to residential development. Figure PR1 documents recent cost factors per acre for park improvements and land. Based on four park site acquisitions, land for parks in Meridian is expected to cost approximately $61,000 per acre. City staff confirmed this land cost factor is reasonable and consistent with a recent land valuation of $65,000 per acre quoted for expansion of the City’s wastewater treatment plant. As shown in the table below, park improvements have been averaging $241,000 per acre. Figure PR1: Cost Factors for Park Improvements Citywide Parks Citywide parks have active amenities, such as a soccer/football/baseball fields, basketball/volleyball courts, and playgrounds that will attract patrons from the entire service area. As shown in Figure PR2, the current infrastructure standard is 2.91 acres per 1,000 residents. At the bottom of the table below is a needs analysis for citywide park improvements. To maintain current standards over the next ten years, Meridian will improve 102.3 acres of parks, expected to cost approximately $24.65 million. Estimated Costs Park Name Acres Land Improvements Discovery Park 27.00 $405,184 $8,261,000 Reta Huskey Park 8.92 $680,007 $1,495,126 Keith Bird Legacy Park 7.50 $1,274,995 $1,382,621 Hillsdale Park 9.53 $857,700 $1,622,282 Total Costs 52.95 $3,217,886 $12,761,029 Weighted Average Cost per Acre => $61,000 $241,000 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 515 of 576 Figure PR2: Citywide Parks Standards and Need for Improved Acres Existing Parks Improved Acres Julius M. Kleiner Park 58.2 Settlers Park 57.7 Heroes Park 30.1 Discovery Park 27.0 Fuller Park 23.2 Bear Creak Park 18.8 Tully Park 18.7 Storey Park & Bark Park 17.9 Gordon Harris Park 11.1 Hillsdale Park 9.5 Reta Husky Park 8.9 Jabil Soccer Fields 8.4 Keith Bird Legacy Park 7.5 Seasons Park 7.1 Chateau Park 6.7 Renaissance Park 6.5 Champion Park 6.0 Heritage MS Ball Fields 5.6 8th Street Park 2.8 Centennial Park 0.4 Total => 332.2 Allocation Factors for Parks Improvements Cost per Acre $241,000 Residential Proportionate Share 100% Service Units Population in 2019 114,102 Infrastructure Standards for Parks Improved Acres Residential (per person) 0.00291 Park Needs Year Population Improved Acres Base 2019 114,102 332.2 Year 1 2020 121,126 352.7 Year 2 2021 126,812 369.2 Year 3 2022 132,163 384.8 Year 4 2023 136,845 398.4 Year 5 2024 140,190 408.2 Year 10 2029 149,248 434.5 Ten-Yr Increase 35,146 102.3 Growth Cost of Parks => $24,654,300 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 516 of 576 Recreation Buildings Figure PR3 lists current floor area for recreation centers. Based on input from the Impact Fee Advisory Committee, Meridian should expect to spend at least $225 per square foot to construct future recreation buildings. The lower portion of the table below indicates projected service units over the next ten years. To maintain current standards, Meridian will need 17,096 additional square feet of recreation building space, expected to cost approximately $3.85 million. Figure PR3: Infrastructure Standards and Needs for Recreation Buildings Revenue Credit Evaluation Currently the City of Meridian does not have any outstanding debt related to parks and recreation facilities. Therefore, a revenue credit for bond payments is not applicable. As shown in the cash flow analysis below, projected impact fee revenue matches the growth cost of new facilities. Because impact fees fully fund expected growth costs, there is no potential double-payment from other revenue sources. Proposed and Current Impact Fees At the top of Figure PR4 is a summary of the infrastructure needs due to growth. The projected need for acres of improved parks and square feet of recreation centers was addressed above. The need to acquire an additional five acres of land for parks is based on staff’s comparison of the existing inventory of undeveloped park sites (i.e., 97 acres) to the projected need for 102 additional acres over the next ten years. In addition to the growth cost of parks and recreation facilities, impact fees include the cost of professional services related to the CFP (authorized by the Idaho impact fee enabling legislation), less the projected park impact fee fund balance at the end of the current fiscal year. The net growth cost of $26,168,471 divided by the projected increase in population from 2019 to 2029, yields a cost of $744 per service unit. To be consistent with 67-8204(16) of the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act, impact fees are derived using the cost per service unit multiplied by the average number of service units per Existing Recreation Centers Square Feet Meridian Community Center 4,200 1 Meridian Homecourt 51,303 1 Total to Include in Current Standards 55,503 Allocation Factors for Recreation Centers Building plus Land Cost per Square Foot* $225 Residential Proportionate Share 100% 2019 Meridian Population 114,102 * Based on local developer estimate. Square Feet Residential (per person) 0.49 Recreation Center Needs Year Population Square Feet Base 2019 114,102 55,503 Year 1 2020 121,126 58,920 Year 2 2021 126,812 61,686 Year 3 2022 132,163 64,288 Year 4 2023 136,845 66,566 Year 5 2024 140,190 68,193 Year 10 2029 149,248 72,599 Ten-Yr Increase 35,146 17,096 Growth Cost for Recreation Buildings => $3,847,000 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 517 of 576 dwelling. The row highlighted light green indicates the updated impact fee for an average-size dwelling, which assumes 2.82 persons per housing unit. The latter was derived by dividing the projected increase in population by the projected increase in housing units over the next ten years. Please see Appendix A for supporting documentation on the average number of persons by dwelling size in Meridian (note: the person per housing unit values shown in Figure A4 were adjusted downward by multiplying the value for each size threshold by the ratio of 2.82 divided by 3.11). The blue arrow shown in the table below compares the updated fee for the average size dwelling to the average impact fee per housing unit based on the allocation methodology from the 2013 impact fee study. In contrast to the “one size fits all” flat fee for all dwellings, the updated methodology proposes lower impact fees for smaller, more affordable units, along with a higher fee for dwellings with 3201 or more square feet of climate-controlled space. Figure PR4: Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Schedule 2019 Input Variables Infrastructure Type Infrastructure Units Growth Quantity Over Ten Years Cost Factor per Unit Growth Cost (rounded) Park Improvements acres 102 $241,000 $24,654,000 Park Land acres 5 $61,000 $305,000 Recreation Centers sq ft 17,096 $225 $3,847,000 Total => $28,806,000 Professional Services Cost => $18,603 Less Projected Fund Balance 9/30/2019 => -$2,656,132 Net Growth Cost => $26,168,471 Population Increase 2019 to 2029 35,146 Cost per Service Unit $744 Residential Impact Fees (per dwelling) Square Feet of Climate-Controlled Space Persons per Housing Unit Proposed Parks & Recreation Fee Current Fees Increase or Decrease % Change 1000 or less 1.05 $781 $1,113 ($332) -30% 1001 to 1500 1.83 $1,361 $1,113 $248 22% 1501 to 2500 2.38 $1,770 $1,113 $657 59% 2501 to 3200 2.82 $2,098 $1,113 $985 88% 3201 or more 3.29 $2,447 $1,113 $1,334 120% Comparison to 2013 Method Housing Unit Increase 2019 to 2029 12,466 Impact Fee per Housing Unit $2,099 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 518 of 576 Forecast of Revenues for Parks and Recreation Figure PR5 indicates Meridian should receive approximately $26.15 million in parks and recreation impact fee revenue over the next ten years, if actual development matches the projections documented in Appendix A. To the extent the rate of development either accelerates or slows down, there will be a corresponding change in the need for infrastructure and impact fee revenue. Figure PR5: Projected Impact Fee Revenue Ten-Year Growth Cost => $26,168,471 Parks Impact Fee Revenue Average Residential $2,098 Year per housing unit Hsg Units Base 2019 42,345 Year 1 2020 44,445 Year 2 2021 46,145 Year 3 2022 47,746 Year 4 2023 49,145 Year 5 2024 50,145 Year 10 2029 54,811 Ten-Yr Increase 12,466 Projected Revenue => $26,150,000 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 519 of 576 Comprehensive Financial Plan for Parks and Recreation As specified in 67-8203(29), development impact fees in Meridian exclude costs to provide better service to existing development. Existing parks and recreation centers are fully utilized and there is no surplus capacity for future development. City staff recommends the improvements listed in Figure PR6 to accommodate additional development over the next ten years. Total impact fee funding of approximately $28.8 million represents a growth share of 80%, requiring approximately $7.28 million from other revenue sources over the next ten years. Figure PR6: Summary of Ten-Year CFP for Parks and Recreation Needed Planned Improved Acres 102.3 151 Building Sq Ft 17,096 22,000 FY Description Amount Units Cost 2020 West Meridian Regional Park - Design $500,000 2022 West Meridian Regional Park - Construction 47 acres $5,147,500 2021 New Community Center - Design & Construction Documents $500,000 2023 New Community Center - Construction 22,000 square feet $5,000,000 2027 Margaret Aldape Park - Design $994,000 2029 Margaret Aldape Park - Construction 70 acres $10,012,500 2021 Discovery Park, Phase 2 - Design $500,000 2023 Discovery Park, Phase 2 - Construction 25 $5,160,000 2023 Discovery Park, Phase 3 - Design $500,000 2025 Discovery Park, Phase 3 - Construction 25 acres $5,160,000 2022 Brundage/Graycliff Park - Design $185,000 2024 Brundage/Graycliff Park - Construction 9 acres $1,906,500 2021 Additional Land Acquisition 5 acres $525,000 Total Cost => $36,090,500 Growth Cost Funded by Impact Fees => $28,806,000 Growth Share => 80% Existing Development Share to be Funded by Other Revenues => $7,284,500 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 520 of 576 Police Impact Fees The City of Meridian will use an incremental expansion cost method to maintain existing infrastructure standards for police buildings. Proportionate Share In Meridian, police and fire infrastructure standards, projected needs, and development fees are based on both residential and nonresidential development. As shown in Figure P1, functional population was used to allocate public safety infrastructure and costs to residential and nonresidential development. Functional population is like the U.S. Census Bureau’s "daytime population," by accounting for people living and working in a jurisdiction. It also considers commuting patterns and time spent at residential versus nonresidential locations. Residents that don't work are assigned 20 hours per day to residential development and four hours per day to nonresidential development (annualized averages). Residents that work in Meridian are assigned 14 hours to residential development and 10 hours to nonresidential development. Residents that work outside Meridian are assigned 14 hours to residential development. Inflow commuters are assigned 10 hours to nonresidential development. Based on 2015 functional population data for Meridian, the cost allocation for residential development is 73% while nonresidential development accounts for 27% of the demand for fire infrastructure. Figure P1: Functional Population Excluded Costs Police development fees in Meridian exclude costs to meet existing needs and stricter safety, efficiency, environmental or regulatory standards. The City’s CFP addresses the cost of these excluded items. Also excluded from the police development fees are public safety vehicles and Functional Population Cost Allocation for Public Safety Demand Units in 2015 Demand Person Residential Hours/Day Hours Population* 91,360 61% Residents Not Working 55,961 20 1,119,220 39% Resident Workers** 35,399 20% Worked in City** 7,231 14 101,234 80% Worked Outside City** 28,168 14 394,352 Residential Subtotal 1,614,806 Residential Share => 73% Nonresidential Non-working Residents 55,961 4 223,844 Jobs Located in City** 36,676 20% Residents Working in City** 7,231 10 72,310 80% Non-Resident Workers (inflow commuters) 29,445 10 294,450 Nonresidential Subtotal 590,604 Nonresidential Share => 27% TOTAL 2,205,410 * 2015 U.S. Census Bureau population estimate. ** 2015 Inflow/Outflow Analysis, OnTheMap web application, U.S. Census Bureau data for all jobs. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 521 of 576 equipment that do not meet the minimum useful life requirement in Idaho’s Impact Fee Act. Current Use and Available Capacity In Meridian, police facilities are fully utilized and there is no surplus capacity for future development. Meridian has determined that police building space will require expansion to accommodate future development. Police Facilities, Service Units, and Standards Police development fees in Meridian are based on the same level of service provided to existing development. Figure P2 inventories police buildings in Meridian. Because the training center is also used by the Fire Department, floor area was reduced to indicate the portion used by Meridian police. For residential development, Meridian will use year-round population within the service areas to derive current police infrastructure standards. For nonresidential development, Meridian will use inbound, average-weekday, vehicle trips as the service unit. Figure P2 indicates the allocation of police building space to residential and nonresidential development, along with FY18-19 service units in Meridian. Vehicle trips to nonresidential development are based on floor area estimates for industrial, commercial, institutional, office and other services, as documented in the Land Use Assumptions. For police development fees, Meridian will use a cost factor of $333 per square foot (provided by City staff). The cost factor includes design and construction management. Based on FY18- 19 service units, the standard in Meridian is 0.26 square feet of police building floor area per person in the service area. For nonresidential development, Meridian’s standard is 0.06 square feet of police building per inbound vehicle trip to nonresidential development, on an average weekday. Figure P2: Meridian Police Buildings and Standards Police Infrastructure Needs Idaho’s development fee enabling legislation requires jurisdictions to convert land use assumptions into service units and the corresponding need for additional infrastructure over the next ten years. As shown in Figure P3, projected population and inbound nonresidential vehicle trips drive the need for police buildings and vehicles. Meridian will need 12,161 additional square feet of police buildings. The ten-year, growth-related capital cost of police buildings is approximately $4.05 million. Police Buildings Square Feet PSTC (half) 7,250 Admin Building 33,000 TOTAL 40,250 Source: City of Meridian Police Department. Police Buildings Standards Residential Nonresidential Proportionate Share (based on functional population) 73% 27% Growth Indicator Population Avg Wkdy Veh Trips to Nonres Dev Service Units in FY18-19 114,102 179,607 Square Feet per Service Unit 0.26 0.06 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 522 of 576 Figure P3: Police Facilities Needed to Accommodate Growth Revenue Credit Evaluation Currently the City of Meridian does not have any outstanding debt related to police facilities. Therefore, a revenue credit for bond payments is not applicable. As shown in the cash flow analysis below, projected impact fee revenue matches the growth cost of new facilities. Based on the City of Meridian’s legislative policy decision to fully fund expected growth costs from impact fees, there is no potential double-payment from other revenue sources. Police Development Fees Infrastructure standards and cost factors for police are summarized in the upper portion of Figure P4. The conversion of infrastructure needs and costs per service unit into a cost per development unit is also shown in the table below. For residential development, average number of persons in a housing unit provides the necessary conversion. Persons per housing unit, by size threshold are documented in the Land Use Assumptions. For nonresidential development, trip generation rates by type of development are from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE 2017). To ensure the analysis is based on travel demand associated with nonresidential development within Meridian, trip ends (entering and exiting) are converted to inbound trips using a basic 50% adjustment factor. In addition to the growth cost of police facilities, impact fees include the cost of professional services related to the CFP (authorized by the Idaho Impact Fee Act), less the projected police impact fee fund balance expected at the end of the current fiscal year. The net growth cost of $2,633,140, divided by the projected increase in population from 2019 to 2029, yields a cost of $54 per residential service unit. Impact fees are derived using the cost per service unit multiplied by the average number of service units per development unit. The row highlighted light blue indicates the updated police fee for an average-size dwelling is $152 (truncated), which assumes 2.82 persons per housing unit. The latter was derived by dividing the projected increase in population by the projected increase in housing units over the next ten years. Please see Appendix A for supporting documentation on the average number of persons by dwelling size in Meridian (note: the person per housing unit values shown in Figure A4 were adjusted downward by multiplying the value for each size threshold by the ratio of 2.82 divided by 3.11). The blue arrow shown in the table below compares the updated fee for the average size dwelling to the average impact fee per housing unit based on the allocation methodology from the 2013 impact Police Infrastructure Standards and Capital Costs Buildings - Residential 0.26 Sq Ft per person Buildings - Nonresidential 0.06 Sq Ft per trip Police Buildings Cost $333 per square foot Infrastructure Needed Veh Trips to Police Year Population Nonres in Meridian Buildings (sq ft) Base 2019 114,102 179,607 40,250 Year 1 2020 121,126 184,062 42,328 Year 2 2021 126,812 188,819 44,080 Year 3 2022 132,163 193,625 45,749 Year 4 2023 136,845 198,637 47,258 Year 5 2024 140,190 203,714 48,427 Year 10 2029 149,248 231,013 52,411 Ten-Yr Increase 35,146 51,406 12,161 Growth Cost of Police Buildings => $4,050,000 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 523 of 576 fee study. In contrast to the “one size fits all” flat fee for all dwellings, the updated methodology proposes lower impact fees for smaller, more affordable units, along with a higher fee for dwellings with 3201 or more square feet of climate-controlled space. Figure P4: Police Impact Fees per Development Unit Projected Revenue for Police Facilities Over the next ten years, police development fee revenue is projected to approximately match the growth cost of police infrastructure, which has a ten-year total cost of approximately $2.6 million (see the upper portion of Figure P5). The table below indicates Meridian should receive 2019 Input Variables Infrastructure Type Infrastructure Units Growth Quantity Over Ten Years Cost Factor per Unit Growth Cost (rounded) Police Buildings square feet 12,161 $333 $4,050,000 Outdoor Training Facility 23% $690,000 Total => $4,740,000 Professional Services Cost => $18,603 Less Projected Fund Balance 9/30/2019 => -$2,125,463 Net Growth Cost => $2,633,140 Residential 73% Nonresidential 27% Residential $1,922,192 Nonresidential $710,948 Cost per Service Unit Residential (persons) 35,146 $54 Nonresidential (vehicle trips) 51,406 $13 Residential Impact Fees (per housing unit) Square Feet of Climate- Controlled Space Persons per Housing Unit Proposed Police Facilities Fees Current Fees Increase or Decrease % Change 1000 or less 1.05 $56 $223 ($167) -75% 1001 to 1500 1.83 $98 $223 ($125) -56% 1501 to 2500 2.38 $128 $223 ($95) -43% 2501 to 3200 2.82 $152 $223 ($71) -32% 3201 or more 3.29 $177 $223 ($46) -21% Nonresidential Impact Fees (square foot of building) Type Avg Wkdy Veh Trip Ends per KSF Trip Adjustment Factors Proposed Police Facilities Fees Current Fees Increase or Decrease % Change Commercial 37.75 50% $0.24 $0.12 $0.12 100% All Other 9.00 50% $0.05 $0.12 ($0.07) -58% Comparison to 2013 Method Housing Unit Increase 2019 to 2029 12,466 Impact Fee per Housing Unit $154 Nonresidential Floor Area Increase 2019 to 2029 6,960,000 Impact Fee per Square Foot $0.10 Cost Allocation Allocated Cost by Land Use Growth 2019 to 2029 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 524 of 576 approximately $2.5 million in police development fee revenue, if actual development matches the land use assumptions. To the extent the rate of development either accelerates or slows down, there will be a corresponding change in the need for infrastructure and development fee revenue. Figure P5: Police Development Fee Revenue Comprehensive Financial Plan for Police City staff recommends the improvements listed in Figure P6 to accommodate additional development over the next ten years. Impact fees will pay for approximately $4.74 million, representing a growth share of 59%. Other revenue sources will be required to fund approximately $3.26 million in police facilities over the next ten years. Figure P6: Summary of Ten-Year CFP for Police Ten-Year Growth Cost of Police Facilities => $2,633,140 Police Impact Fee Revenue Average Residential Industrial Commercial Institutional Office & Other Services $152 $50 $240 $50 $50 per housing unit per 1000 Sq Ft per 1000 Sq Ft per 1000 Sq Ft per 1000 Sq Ft Year Hsg Units KSF KSF KSF KSF Base 2019 42,345 9,070 4,890 4,450 5,890 Year 1 2020 44,445 9,300 5,010 4,560 6,040 Year 2 2021 46,145 9,540 5,140 4,680 6,190 Year 3 2022 47,746 9,780 5,270 4,800 6,350 Year 10 2029 54,811 11,670 6,290 5,720 7,580 Ten-Yr Increase 12,466 2,600 1,400 1,270 1,690 Projected Revenue => $1,895,000 $130,000 $336,000 $64,000 $85,000 Total Projected Revenues (rounded) => $2,510,000 Buildings Description Square Feet Total Cost Training Facility Classroom 3,000 $1,000,000 Administrative Building Expansion Phase 1 3,000 $1,000,000 Administrative Building Expansion Phase 2 3,000 $1,000,000 Substation 6,000 $2,000,000 Total => 15,000 $5,000,000 Cost per Square Foot => $333 Outdoor Facilities Description Cost Outdoor Training Facility $3,000,000 Total => $8,000,000 Growth Cost Funded by Impact Fees => $4,740,000 Growth Share Funded by Impact Fees => 59% Share to be Funded by Other Revenues => $3,260,000 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 525 of 576 Fire Impact Fees After evaluating calls for service data to general types of development, Raftelis recommends functional population to allocate the cost of additional fire infrastructure to residential and nonresidential development (see Figure P1 above and related text). Fire development fees in Meridian are based on the same level of service currently provided to existing development. Existing Standards for Fire Facilities Figure F1 inventories Fire Department buildings in Meridian. Because the training center is also used by the Police Department, floor area was reduced to indicate the portion used by Meridian Fire Department. The standard for fire buildings is 0.44 square feet per person and 0.46 square feet per job. Figure F1: Existing Fire Buildings Development fees will be used to expand the fleet of fire vehicles and purchase communications equipment with a useful life of at least ten years. Figure F2 lists fire vehicles and communications equipment currently used by the Meridian Fire Department. Following the same methodology used for fire buildings, the total cost of fire vehicles and equipment was allocated 73% to residential and 27% to nonresidential development in Meridian. As shown below, every additional resident will require Meridian to spend approximately $62 for additional fire vehicles and equipment. Every additional job requires the City to spend approximately $64 for additional fire vehicles and equipment. Fire Stations Square Feet Fire Station # 1 (540 E. Franklin Rd) 11,700 Fire Station # 3 (3545 N. Locust Grove) 7,040 Fire Station # 2 (2401 N. Ten Mile Rd) 6,770 Fire Station # 4 (2515 S. Eagle Rd) 7,077 Fire Station # 5 (N. Linder Rd) 7,360 Fire Station # 6 0 PSTC (half) 7,250 Training Tower @ Station #1 6,523 Fire Safety Center (1901 Leighfield Dr) 1,744 Fire Admin Space (City Hall) 13,511 TOTAL 68,975 Allocation Factors for Fire Stations Residential Share 73% Functional Nonresidential Share 27% Population Population in 2019 114,102 Jobs in 2019 40,575 Infrastructure Standards for Fire Stations Square Feet Residential (per person) 0.44 Nonresidential (per job) 0.46 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 526 of 576 Figure F2: Existing Standards for Fire Vehicles Fire Infrastructure Needs The City’s Comprehensive Plan and website describe existing fire facilities. In Meridian, fire facilities are fully utilized and there is no surplus capacity for future development. The City has determined that fire facilities will require expansion to accommodate future development. As specified in 67-8203(29), development impact fees in Meridian exclude costs to repair, upgrade, update, expand or replace existing capital improvements to provide better service to existing development. To accommodate projected development over the next ten years, Meridian will expand fire buildings by 20,859 square feet and spend $2.93 million to expand the fleet of fire vehicles. Fire Apparatus and Equipment Coding Total Cost Engines FE $5,148,000 Ladder Truck LT $1,600,000 Pickup Trucks PT $539,659 Other Vehicles OV $287,700 Communications Equipment CE $2,112,284 TOTAL $9,687,643 Allocation Factors for Fire Apparatus and Communications Residential Share 73% Functional Nonresidential Share 27% population Population in 2019 114,102 Jobs in 2019 40,575 Infrastructure Standards for Fire Apparatus and Communications Apparatus and Communications Residential (per person) $61.98 Nonresidential (per job) $64.46 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 527 of 576 Figure F3: Growth-Related Need for Fire Facilities Revenue Credit Evaluation Currently the City of Meridian does not have any outstanding debt related to fire facilities. Therefore, a revenue credit for bond payments is not applicable. As shown in the cash flow analysis below, projected impact fee revenue matches the growth cost of new facilities. Based on the City of Meridian’s legislative policy decision to fully fund expected growth costs from impact fees, there is no potential double-payment from other revenue sources. Current and Proposed Fire Impact Fees Figure F4 indicates proposed impact fees for fire facilities in Meridian. Residential fees are derived from average number of persons per housing unit and the cost per person. Nonresidential fees are based on average jobs per 1,000 square feet of floor area and the cost per job. The cost factors for fire facilities are summarized in the upper portion of Figure F4. Persons per unit, by dwelling size, are based on local data, as discussed in the Land Use Assumptions. For nonresidential development, average jobs per thousand square feet of floor area are also documented in the Land Use Assumptions. To be consistent with 67-8204(16) of the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act, impact fees are derived using the cost per service unit multiplied by the average number of service units per development unit. The row highlighted light orange indicates the updated impact fee for an average-size dwelling is $693 (truncated), which assumes 2.82 persons per housing unit and a cost of $246 per additional person. Please see Appendix A for supporting documentation on the average number of persons by dwelling size in Meridian (note: the person per housing unit values shown in Figure A4 were adjusted downward by multiplying the value for each size threshold by the ratio of 2.82 divided by 3.11). The blue arrow shown in the table below Fire Infrastructure Standards and Capital Costs Fire Station s - Residential 0.44 Sq Ft per household Fire Station s - Nonresidential 0.46 Sq Ft per job Fire Station Cost $535 per square foot Fire Apparatus/Communications - Residential $61.98 Cost per person Fire Apparatus/Communications - Nonres $64.46 Cost per job Facilities Needed Population Meridian Sq Ft of Fire Fire Apparatus and Year Jobs Stations Communications Base 2019 114,102 40,575 68,975 $9,687,643 Year 1 2020 121,126 41,612 72,551 $10,189,837 Year 2 2021 126,812 42,677 75,549 $10,610,907 Year 3 2022 132,163 43,768 78,411 $11,012,890 Year 4 2023 136,845 44,887 80,990 $11,375,214 Year 5 2024 140,190 46,035 82,993 $11,656,541 Year 6 2025 143,578 47,214 85,030 $11,942,532 Year 7 2026 144,996 48,421 86,209 $12,108,228 Year 8 2027 146,413 49,659 87,403 $12,275,860 Year 9 2028 147,831 50,929 88,611 $12,445,618 Year 10 2029 149,248 52,231 89,834 $12,617,376 Ten -Yr Increase 35,146 11,656 20,859 $2,929,733 Cost of Fire Stations => $11,160,000 Cost of Fire Apparatus and Communications => $2,930,000 Total Growth Cost => $14,090,000 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 528 of 576 compares the updated fee for the average size dwelling to the average impact fee per housing unit based on the allocation methodology from the 2013 impact fee study. In contrast to the “one size fits all” flat fee of $695 for all dwellings, the updated methodology proposes lower impact fees for smaller, more affordable units, along with a higher fee for dwellings with 3201 or more square feet of climate-controlled space. Proposed nonresidential development fees for fire facilities are shown in the column with light orange shading. The 2019 study recommends nonresidential fees by two general categories, Commercial and All Other types of nonresidential development. Commercial includes all buildings within a shopping center, plus stand-alone retail development and eating/drinking places (i.e., restaurants and bars). All Other includes industrial, warehousing, offices, business services, and personal services (i.e., every type of non-residential development not considered Commercial). The previous study had a single fee for all types of nonresidential development. The average fire impact fee per square foot for nonresidential development increased from $0.35 in 2013 to $0.46 in 2019. Based on the 2019 fee schedule, a new warehouse would be in the category of All Other. This fee category assumes 1.50 jobs per thousand square feet of floor area. To convert the fee to an amount per square foot, we divide by 1000 then multiply by the cost factor per job ($274). The result is $0.41 (truncated) per square foot. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 529 of 576 Figure F4: Fee Schedule for Fire Facilities 2019 Input Variables Infrastructure Type Infrastructure Units Growth Quantity Over Ten Years Cost Factor per Unit Growth Cost (rounded) Fire Stations square feet 20,859 $535 $11,160,000 Fire Apparatus dollars $2,930,000 Total => $14,090,000 Professional Services Cost => $18,603 Less Projected Fund Balance 9/30/2019 => -$2,241,236 Net Growth Cost => $11,867,367 Residential 73% Nonresidential 27% Residential $8,663,178 Nonresidential $3,204,189 Cost per Service Unit Residential (persons) 35,146 $246 Nonresidential (jobs) 11,656 $274 Residential Impact Fees (per housing unit) Square Feet of Climate- Controlled Space Persons per Hsg Unit Proposed Fire Facilities Fee Current Fees Increase or Decrease % Change 1000 or less 1.05 $258 $681 ($423) -62% 1001 to 1500 1.83 $450 $681 ($231) -34% 1501 to 2500 2.38 $585 $681 ($96) -14% 2501 to 3200 2.82 $693 $681 $12 2% 3201 or more 3.29 $809 $681 $128 19% Nonresidential Impact Fees (square foot of building) Type Jobs per 1,000 Sq Ft Proposed Fire Facilities Fee Current Fees Increase or Decrease % Change Commercial 2.34 $0.64 $0.35 $0.29 83% All Other 1.50 $0.41 $0.35 $0.06 17% Comparison to 2013 Method Housing Unit Increase 2019 to 2029 12,466 Impact Fee per Housing Unit $695 Nonresidential Sq Ft Increase 2019 to 2029 6,960,000 Impact Fee per Square Foot) $0.46 Cost Allocation Allocated Cost by Land Use Growth 2019 to 2029 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 530 of 576 Projected Revenue for Fire Facilities Over the next ten years, fire development fee revenue is projected to approximately match the growth cost of fire infrastructure, which has a ten-year growth cost of $11,867,367 (see the upper portion of Figure F5). The table below indicates Meridian should receive approximately $11.82 million in fire development fee revenue, if actual development matches the land use assumptions. The revenue projection assumes implementation of the proposed fire fees and that development from 2019 to 2029 is consistent with the land use assumptions described in Appendix A. To the extent the rate of development either accelerates or slows down, there will be a corresponding change in the development fee revenue. Figure F5: Fire Development Fee Revenue Ten-Year Cost of Growth-Related Fire Facilities => $11,867,367 Fire Impact Fee Revenue Average Residential Industrial Commercial Institutional Office and Other Services $693 $410 $640 $410 $410 Year per housing unit per 1000 Sq Ft per 1000 Sq Ft per 1000 Sq Ft per 1000 Sq Ft Hsg Units KSF KSF KSF KSF Base 2019 42,345 9,070 4,890 4,450 5,890 Year 1 2020 44,445 9,300 5,010 4,560 6,040 Year 2 2021 46,145 9,540 5,140 4,680 6,190 Year 3 2022 47,746 9,780 5,270 4,800 6,350 Year 4 2023 49,145 10,030 5,410 4,920 6,510 Year 5 2024 50,145 10,290 5,550 5,040 6,680 Year 6 2025 51,159 10,550 5,690 5,170 6,850 Year 7 2026 52,071 10,820 5,830 5,310 7,030 Year 8 2027 52,984 11,100 5,980 5,440 7,210 Year 9 2028 53,898 11,380 6,140 5,580 7,390 Year 10 2029 54,811 11,670 6,290 5,720 7,580 Ten-Yr Increase 12,466 2,600 1,400 1,270 1,690 Projected Revenue => $8,640,000 $1,070,000 $900,000 $520,000 $690,000 Total Projected Revenues (rounded) => $11,820,000 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 531 of 576 Comprehensive Financial Plan for Fire Facilities Using impact fee funding over the next ten years, Figure F6 indicates that Meridian plans to expand fire station floor area by approximately 25,000 square feet. Meridian will also purchase additional fire vehicles costing approximately $4.38 million. The total cost for these projects is approximately $17.75 million. The growth cost funded by impact fees is $14.09 million over ten years, which is 79% of the total cost. An additional $3.66 million in other revenues will be required to fully fund the Fire Department’s CFP for growth-related improvements. Figure F6: Summary of Ten-Year CFP for Fire Facilities Fire Stations Square Feet Total Cost Purchase Land for Fire Station #7 $500,000 Design Fire Station #7 $800,000 Build Fire Station #7 12,500 $5,387,500 Purchase Land for Fire Station #8 $250,000 Design Fire Station #8 $800,000 Build Fire Station #8 12,500 $5,637,500 Total => 25,000 $13,375,000 Cost per Sq Ft Based on Stations #7 & #8 => $535 Fire Apparatus Units Total Cost Quint Truck 1 $1,600,000 Heavy Rescue Vehicle 1 $800,000 Fire Engine Station #7 1 $572,000 Fire Engine Station #8 1 $572,000 Vehicle for EMS Captain 1 $63,000 Vehicle for Fire Inspector/Investigator 1 $63,000 Vehicle for Battalion Chiefs 1 $63,000 Alternative Response Unit 2 $642,000 Total => 9 $4,375,000 Total => $17,750,000 Growth Cost Funded by Impact Fees => $14,090,000 Growth Share => 79% Funded by Other Revenues => $3,660,000 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 532 of 576 Fee Implementation and Administration Consistent with best practices and Idaho’s enabling legislation, Meridian updates capital improvements and development impact fees every five years. In addition, some jurisdictions make annual adjustments for inflation using a price index like the Engineering News Record (ENR) Construction Cost Index published by McGraw-Hill Companies. This index could be applied to the adopted impact fee schedule, reviewed by the Advisory Committee, then approved by City Council. If cost estimates or demand indicators change significantly, the City should redo the fee calculations. Another best practice is to spend impact fees as soon as possible, tracking funds according to first in, first out accounting, using aggregate rather than project-specific tracking. Impact fees and accrued interest are maintained in a separate fund that is not comingled with other revenues. In Idaho, an annual report is mandatory, indicating impact fee collections, expenditures, and fund balances by type of infrastructure. Cost of CFP Preparation As stated in Idaho’s enabling legislation, a surcharge on the collection of development impact fees may be used to fund the cost of preparing the CFP that is attributable to the impact fee determination. This minor cost ($18,603 per infrastructure type) was added to the 2019 Meridian impact fees. Development Categories Proposed impact fees for residential development are by square feet of climate-controlled space, excluding porches, garage and unfinished space, such as basements and attics. For an apartment building, the average size threshold is derived for an entire building. The recommended procedure is to identify the aggregate climate-controlled floor area for the entire building, divided by the number of dwelling units in the building. Apartment complexes and some residential development provide common areas for use by residents, such as exercise rooms and clubhouses. Common areas for the private use of residents are ancillary uses to the dwelling units and not subject to additional impact fees. Also, Section 67-8204(20) of the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act states that an addition to an existing residential building, that does not increase the number of service units, should be exempt from additional impact fees. Given the relatively small fee increase across size thresholds and the high transaction cost to assess fees for additions to residential buildings, Raftelis recommends that additions to residential buildings should not be subject to additional impact fees. The two general nonresidential development categories in the proposed impact fee schedule can be used for all new construction within Meridian. Nonresidential development categories represent general groups of land uses that share similar average weekday vehicle trip generation rates and job density (i.e. jobs per 1,000 square feet of floor area), as documented in Appendix A. “Commercial” includes retail development and eating/drinking places (i.e., restaurants and bars). All land uses within a shopping center will pay the impact fee for commercial development. All Other includes industrial, warehousing, offices, business services, and personal services (i.e., every type of non-residential development not considered Commercial). An applicant may submit an independent study to document unique demand indicators (i.e., service units per development unit). The independent study should be prepared by a professional engineer or certified planner and use the same type of input variables as those in Meridian’s impact fee study. For residential development, impact fees are based on average persons per Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 533 of 576 housing unit. For nonresidential development, impact fees are based on inbound average weekday vehicle trips per 1,000 square feet of floor area, and the average number of jobs per 1,000 square feet of floor area. The independent fee study will be reviewed by City staff and can be accepted as the basis for a unique fee calculation. If staff determines the independent fee study is not reasonable, the applicant may appeal the administrative decision to Meridian’s elected officials for their consideration. Credits and Reimbursements A general requirement that is common to impact fee methodologies is the evaluation of credits. A revenue credit may be necessary to avoid potential double payment situations arising from one-time impact fees plus on-going payment of other revenues that may also fund growth-related capital improvements. The determination of revenue credits is dependent upon the impact fee methodology used in the cost analysis. Policies and procedures related to site-specific credits should be addressed in the ordinance that establishes the impact fees. Project-level improvements, required as part of the development approval process, are not eligible for credits against impact fees. If a developer constructs a system improvement included in the fee calculations, it will be necessary to either reimburse the developer or provide a credit against the fees. The latter option is more difficult to administer because it creates unique fees for specific geographic areas. Based on national experience, Raftelis recommends a jurisdiction establish a reimbursement agreement with the developer that constructs a system improvement. The reimbursement agreement should be limited to a payback period of no more than ten years and the City should not pay interest on the outstanding balance. The developer must provide documentation of the actual cost incurred for the system improvement. The City should only agree to pay the lesser of the actual construction cost or the estimated cost used in the impact fee analysis. If the City pays more than the cost used in the fee analysis, there will be insufficient fee revenue. Reimbursement agreements should only obligate the City to reimburse developers annually according to actual fee collections from the benefiting area. The supporting documentation for each type of impact fee describes the types of infrastructure considered to be system improvements. Site specific credits or developer reimbursements for one type of system improvement does not negate an impact fee for other system improvements. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 534 of 576 Appendix A: Land Use Assumptions Appendix A contains the land use assumptions for Meridian’s 2019 DIF update. The CFP must be developed in coordination with the Advisory Committee and utilize land use assumptions most recently adopted by the appropriate land planning agency [see Idaho Code 67-8206(2)]. Idaho’s enabling legislation defines land use assumptions as: “a description of the service area and projections of land uses, densities, intensities, and population in the service area over at least a 20-year period.” Service Areas To ensure a substantial benefit to new development paying impact fees, the City of Meridian has evaluated collection and expenditure zones for public facilities that may have distinct benefit or service areas. In the City of Meridian, impact fees for parks/recreation, police and fire facilities will benefit new development throughout the entire incorporated area. Raftelis recommends one citywide service area for Meridian impact fees. Idaho Code 67-8203(26) defines “service area” as: “Any defined geographic area identified by a governmental entity, or by intergovernmental agreement, in which specific public facilities provide service to development within the area defined, on the basis of sound planning or engineering principles, or both.” The City’s adopted Future Land Use Map indicates land uses, densities, and intensities of development, as required by Idaho Code 67-8203(16). The service area is defined as all land within the city limits of Meridian, as modified over time. Summary of Growth Indicators Population, housing unit, jobs and nonresidential floor area are the “service units” or demand indicators that will be used to evaluate the need for growth-related infrastructure. The demographic data and development projections discussed below will also be used to demonstrate proportionality. All land use assumptions are consistent with Meridian’s Comprehensive Plan. In contrast to the Comprehensive Plan, which is more general and has a long-range horizon, development impact fees require more specific quantitative analysis and have a short-range focus. Typically, impact fee studies look out five to ten years, with the expectation that fees will be periodically updated (e.g. every 5 years). Infrastructure standards will be calibrated using fiscal year 2018-19 data. In Meridian, the fiscal year begins on October 1 st . Key development projections for the City of Meridian are housing units and nonresidential floor area, as shown in Figure A1. These projections will be used to estimate development fee revenue and to indicate the anticipated need for growth-related infrastructure. The goal is to have reasonable projections without being overly concerned with precision. Because impact fee methods are designed to reduce sensitivity to development projections in the determination of the proportionate-share fee amounts, if actual development is slower than projected, fee revenue will decline, but so will the need for growth-related infrastructure. In contrast, if development is faster than anticipated, the City will receive an increase in fee revenue, but will also need to accelerate infrastructure improvements to keep pace with the actual rate of development. Population and housing unit projections were provided by City staff. During the next ten years, the impact fee study assumes Meridian’s population increase at a growth rate of approximately 2.7% per year. Over the next ten years, jobs are expected to increase at a growth rate of approximately 2.6% per year, which is from the Communities in Motion employment forecast from 2010 to 2040. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 535 of 576 Figure A1: Annual Development Projections Proportionate Share The term “proportionate” is found throughout Idaho’s Development Impact Fee Act. For example, Idaho Code 67-8202(2) states the intent to, “Promote orderly growth and development by establishing uniform standards by which local governments may require that those who benefit from new growth and development pay a proportionate share of the cost of new public facilities needed to serve new growth and development;” Because DIFS must be proportionate, jurisdictions derive fees for various land uses per unit of development, as stated in Idaho Code 67-8404(17). “A development impact fee ordinance shall include a schedule of development impact fees for various land uses per unit of development. The ordinance shall provide that a developer shall have the right to elect to pay a project's proportionate share of system improvement costs by payment of development impact fees according to the fee schedule as full and complete payment of the development project's proportionate share of system improvement costs…” Meridian, Idaho FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21-22 FY23-24 FY28-29 FY38-39 Fiscal Year Begins Oct 1st 2019 2020 2021 2022 2024 2029 2039 Base Yr 1 2 3 5 10 20 Total Population City of Meridian 114,102 121,126 126,812 132,163 140,190 149,248 164,187 Annual Increase 7.2% 6.2% 4.7% 4.2% 2.4% 1.0% 1.0% Housing Units Single Family 35,911 37,649 39,056 40,381 42,367 46,229 54,516 Annual Increase 5.6% 4.8% 3.7% 3.4% 2.0% 1.7% 1.7% Multi-Family 6,434 6,796 7,089 7,365 7,778 8,582 10,322 Annual Increase 6.6% 5.6% 4.3% 3.9% 2.3% 1.9% 1.9% Total Housing Units 42,345 44,445 46,145 47,746 50,145 54,811 64,838 Annual Increase 5.7% 5.0% 3.8% 3.5% 2.0% 1.7% 1.7% Persons per Hsg Unit 2.69 2.73 2.75 2.77 2.80 2.72 2.53 Jobs (by place of work) Industrial 7,501 7,693 7,890 8,092 8,511 9,656 12,430 Commercial 11,455 11,748 12,048 12,356 12,996 14,746 18,982 Institutional 4,133 4,238 4,347 4,458 4,689 5,320 6,848 Office & Other Services 17,486 17,933 18,392 18,862 19,839 22,509 28,976 Total Jobs 40,575 41,612 42,677 43,768 46,035 52,231 67,236 Annual Increase 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% Jobs to Housing Ratio 0.96 0.94 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 1.04 Nonresidential Floor Area (square feet in thousands) Industrial 9,070 9,300 9,540 9,780 10,290 11,670 15,030 Commercial 4,890 5,010 5,140 5,270 5,550 6,290 8,100 Institutional 4,450 4,560 4,680 4,800 5,040 5,720 7,370 Office & Other Services 5,890 6,040 6,190 6,350 6,680 7,580 9,760 Total KSF 24,300 24,910 25,550 26,200 27,560 31,260 40,260 Avg Sq Ft Per Job 599 599 599 599 599 598 599 Avg Jobs per KSF 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 536 of 576 Even though formulas and methods are not specified in Idaho’s Development Impact Fee Act, DIFs must be reasonable and fair, as stated in section 67-8201(1). “All development impact fees shall be based on a reasonable and fair formula or method under which the development impact fee imposed does not exceed a proportionate share of the costs incurred, or to be incurred, by the governmental entity in the provision of system improvements to serve the new development. In the following sections, Raftelis describes reasonable and fair formulas and methods that can be used in the City of Meridian to make DIFs proportionate by size of residential development and type of nonresidential development. Residential Development and Persons per Housing Unit The 2010 census did not obtain detailed information using a “long-form” questionnaire. Instead, the U.S. Census Bureau has switched to a continuous monthly mailing of surveys, known as the American Community Survey (ACS), which is limited by sample-size constraints. For example, data on detached housing units are now combined with attached single units (commonly known as townhouses). Part of the rationale for imposing fees by size threshold, as discussed further below, is to address this ACS data limitation. Because townhouses and apartments generally have fewer bedrooms and less floor area than detached units, size thresholds makes fees more proportionate and facilitates construction of affordable units. As shown Figure A2, dwellings with a single unit per structure (detached and attached) average 2.85 persons per housing unit. Dwellings in structures with two or more units average 2.00 year-round residents per unit. This category includes duplexes, which have two dwellings on a single land parcel. According to the latest available data, the overall average is 2.76 year-round residents per housing unit and 2.82 persons per household. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, a household is a housing unit that is occupied by year-round residents. Development fees often use per capita standards and persons per housing unit, or persons per household, to derive proportionate-share fee amounts. Raftelis recommends that fees for residential development in the City of Meridian be imposed according to the number of year-round residents per housing unit. Figure A2: Year-Round Persons per Unit by Type of Housing Demand Indicators by Dwelling Size Impact fees must be proportionate to the demand for infrastructure. Because the average number of persons per housing unit has a strong, positive correlation to the number of bedrooms, Raftelis recommends residential fee schedules that increase by dwelling size. Custom tabulations of Meridian Population and Housing Characteristics Units in Structure Persons House- Persons per Housing Persons per Housing Vacancy holds Household Units Housing Unit Mix Rate Single Unit * 81,202 27,793 2.92 28,448 2.85 89% 2% All Other ** 6,765 3,379 2.00 3,378 2.00 11% 0% Subtotal 87,967 31,172 2.82 31,826 2.76 2% Group Quarters 4,864 TOTAL 92,831 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2016 American Community Survey, 5-Year Estimates, Tables B25024, B25032, B25033, and B26001. *Single unit includes attached and detached. ** All other includes multifamily and mobile homes. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 537 of 576 demographic data by bedroom range can be created from individual survey responses provided by the U.S. Census Bureau, in files known as Public Use Micro-Data Samples (PUMS). PUMS files are only available for areas of at least 100,000 persons, with the City of Meridian included in Public Use Micro-Data Area (PUMA) 701. As shown in Figure A3, Raftelis derived average persons per housing unit by bedroom range, from un-weighted PUMS data. The recommended multipliers by bedroom range (shown below) are for all types of housing units, adjusted to the control totals for Meridian. As shown above, the U.S. Census Bureau indicates that Meridian averages 2.76 persons per housing unit. Figure A3: Persons by Bedroom Range DIFs based on size of dwelling are generally easier to administer when expressed in square feet of finished living space for all types of housing. Basing fees on floor area rather than the number of bedrooms eliminates the need for criteria to make administrative decisions on whether a room qualifies as a bedroom. To translate dwelling size by number of bedrooms into square feet of living space, Raftelis used the 2018 Ada County Assessor’s residential database to derive average square feet by bedroom range (i.e., two, three, and four or more bedrooms). Raftelis recommends that DIFs for residential development be imposed based on finished square feet of living space, excluding garages, patios and porches that are not climate-controlled. Average floor area and number of persons by bedroom range are plotted in Figure A4, with a logarithmic trend line derived from actual averages for Meridian. Using the trend line formula shown in the chart, Raftelis derived the estimated average number of persons, by dwelling size, in size thresholds like those currently used by the City of Boise. As shown with yellow highlighting, the lowest floor area range (1000 square feet or less) has an estimated average of 1.16 persons per housing unit. At the upper end of the floor area range (3201 or more square feet of climate-controlled space), the average is 3.63 persons per housing unit. For a building with more than one residential unit, City staff will determine the average size threshold for the entire building by dividing total climate-controlled floor area by the total number of dwellings in the building. Recommended Multipliers (2) Bedrooms Persons Housing Persons per Housing (1) Units (1) Housing Unit Mix 0-1 48 39 1.30 2.8% 2 353 194 1.92 14.1% 3 1,598 678 2.48 49.2% 4+ 1,614 467 3.64 33.9% Total 3,613 1,378 2.76 100.0% (1) American Community Survey, Public Use Microdat a Sample for ID PUMA 701 (2012-2016 5-year database). (2) Recommendedpersons per housing unit are scaled to make the average derived from PUMS survey data match the control total for Meridian (i.e. 2.76 persons per housing unit). Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 538 of 576 Figure A4: Persons by Square Feet of Living Space Jobs and Nonresidential Development In addition to data on residential development, the calculation of impact fees requires data on nonresidential development. Raftelis uses the term “jobs” to refer to employment by place of work. In Figure A5, color shading indicates nonresidential development prototypes the will be used by Raftelis to derive average weekday vehicle trips and nonresidential floor area. For future industrial development, Raftelis averaged Light Industrial (ITE code 110) and Warehousing (ITE 150) to derive an average of 1,209 square feet per industrial job. The prototype for future commercial development is an average-size Shopping Center (ITE code 820). Commercial development (i.e., retail and eating/drinking places) is assumed to average 427 square feet per job. For institutional development, such as schools, daycare and churches, the impact fee study assumes an average of 1,076 square feet per job. The prototype for institutional development is an Elementary School (ITE 520). For office and other services, an average-size Office (ITE 710) is the prototype for future development, averaging of 337 square feet per job. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 539 of 576 Figure A5: Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends Figure A6 indicates 2015 estimates of jobs and nonresidential floor area within Meridian. Job estimates, by type of nonresidential, are from Meridian’s Work Area Profile, available through the U.S. Census Bureau’s online web application known as OnTheMap. The number of jobs in Meridian is based on quarterly workforce reports supplied by employers. Floor area estimates are derived from the number of jobs by type of nonresidential development and average square feet per job ratios, as discussed on the previous page. Total floor area of nonresidential development in Meridian is consistent with property tax parcel information obtained from Ada County. ITE Land Use / Size Demand Wkdy Trip Ends Wkdy Trip Ends Emp Per Sq Ft Code Unit Per Dmd Unit* Per Employee* Dmd Unit Per Emp 110 Light Industrial 1,000 Sq Ft 4.96 3.05 1.63 615 140 Manufacturing 1,000 Sq Ft 3.93 2.47 1.59 628 150 Warehousing 1,000 Sq Ft 1.74 5.05 0.34 2,902 520 Elementary School 1,000 Sq Ft 19.52 21.00 0.93 1,076 530 High School 1,000 Sq Ft 14.07 22.25 0.63 1,581 610 Hospital 1,000 Sq Ft 10.72 3.79 2.83 354 620 Nursing Home 1,000 Sq Ft 6.64 2.91 2.28 438 710 General Office 1,000 Sq Ft 9.74 3.28 2.97 337 760 Research & Dev Center 1,000 Sq Ft 11.26 3.29 3.42 292 770 Business Park 1,000 Sq Ft 12.44 4.04 3.08 325 820 Shopping Center (avg size) 1,000 Sq Ft 37.75 16.11 2.34 427 857 Discount Club 1,000 Sq Ft 41.80 32.21 1.30 771 Industrial in Meridian 1,000 Sq Ft 3.35 4.05 0.83 1,209 * Trip Generation , Institute of Transportation Engineers, 10th Edition (2017). Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 540 of 576 Figure A6: Jobs and Floor Area Estimates Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 541 of 576 Development Impact Fees Study Final Report March 28, 2019 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 542 of 576 227 W. Trade Street, Suite 1400 Charlotte, NC 28202 www.raftelis.com March 28,2019 Mr.Todd Lavoie Chief Financial Officer City of Meridian 33 E Broadway Ave Meridian, Idaho 83642 Subject:Development Impact Fees Report Dear Mr.Lavoie, Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. (Raftelis) is pleased to provide the 2019 development impact fee update for the City of Meridian.After collaborating with staff and receiving input from the Impact Fee Advisory Committee,Raftelis recommends several changes to improve consistency with Idaho’s enabling legislation, including: Updated development projections and land use assumptions based on Meridian data Documentation of current infrastructure standards and projected need for additional facilities Proportionate fees for two types of nonresidential development and five size thresholds for residential development Our report summarizes key findings and recommendations related to the growth cost of capital improvements,to be funded by development impact fees,along with the need for other revenue sources to ensure a financially feasible Comprehensive Financial Plan. It has been a pleasure working with you and we thank City staff for engaging with quality information and insight regarding best practices for the City of Meridian. Sincerely, Dwayne Guthrie, PhD, AICP Manager Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 543 of 576 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................................................................1 UNIQUE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IDAHO IMPACT FEE ACT .......................................................................................................................1 PROPOSED IMPACT FEES ..................................................................................................................................................................2 PARKS AND RECREATION IMPACT FEES..................................................................................................................................4 CITYWIDE PARKS.............................................................................................................................................................................4 RECREATION BUILDINGS ...................................................................................................................................................................6 REVENUE CREDIT EVALUATION ..........................................................................................................................................................6 PROPOSED AND CURRENT IMPACT FEES ..............................................................................................................................................6 FORECAST OF REVENUES FOR PARKS AND RECREATION...........................................................................................................................8 COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL PLAN FOR PARKS AND RECREATION .............................................................................................................9 POLICE IMPACT FEES ............................................................................................................................................................10 PROPORTIONATE SHARE .................................................................................................................................................................10 EXCLUDED COSTS..........................................................................................................................................................................11 CURRENT USE AND AVAILABLE CAPACITY...........................................................................................................................................11 POLICE FACILITIES,SERVICE UNITS,AND STANDARDS ...........................................................................................................................11 POLICE INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS......................................................................................................................................................12 REVENUE CREDIT EVALUATION ........................................................................................................................................................12 POLICE DEVELOPMENT FEES............................................................................................................................................................12 PROJECTED REVENUE FOR POLICE FACILITIES ......................................................................................................................................14 COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL PLAN FOR POLICE ...................................................................................................................................15 FIRE IMPACT FEES ................................................................................................................................................................16 EXISTING STANDARDS FOR FIRE FACILITIES .........................................................................................................................................16 FIRE INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS .........................................................................................................................................................17 REVENUE CREDIT EVALUATION ........................................................................................................................................................18 CURRENT AND PROPOSED FIRE IMPACT FEES......................................................................................................................................18 PROJECTED REVENUE FOR FIRE FACILITIES..........................................................................................................................................21 COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FIRE FACILITIES ........................................................................................................................22 FEE IMPLEMENTATION AND ADMINISTRATION ...................................................................................................................23 COST OF CFP PREPARATION ...........................................................................................................................................................23 DEVELOPMENT CATEGORIES ...........................................................................................................................................................23 CREDITS AND REIMBURSEMENTS......................................................................................................................................................24 APPENDIX A: LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS ..............................................................................................................................25 SERVICE AREAS.............................................................................................................................................................................25 SUMMARY OF GROWTH INDICATORS ................................................................................................................................................25 PROPORTIONATE SHARE .................................................................................................................................................................26 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND PERSONS PER HOUSING UNIT ............................................................................................................27 DEMAND INDICATORS BY DWELLING SIZE ..........................................................................................................................................28 JOBS AND NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................................................................................30 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 544 of 576 1 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Executive Summary Impact fees are one-time payments used to construct system improvements that serve multiple development projects or even the entire jurisdiction.By law, impact fees can only be used for capital improvements, not operating or maintenance costs.Impact fees are subject to legal standards that satisfy three key tests:need, benefit,and proportionality. First, to justify a fee for public facilities, local government must demonstrate a need for capital improvements. Second, new development must derive a benefit from the payment of the fees (i.e., in the form of public facilities constructed within a reasonable timeframe). Third, the fee paid should not exceed a development’s proportionate share of the capital cost. As documented in this report, the City of Meridian has complied with applicable legal precedents. Impact fees are proportionate and reasonably related to the capital improvement demands of new development, with the projects identified in this study taken from Meridian’s Comprehensive Financial Plan (CFP). Specific costs have been identified using local data and current dollars. With input from City staff,Raftelis determined service units for each type of infrastructure and calculated proportionate share factors to allocate costs by type of development.This report documents the formulas and input variables used to calculate the impact fees for each type of public facility. Impact fee methodologies also identify the extent to which new development is entitled to various types of credits to avoid potent ial double payment of growth-related capital costs. The Idaho Development Impact Fee Act (Idaho Code Title 67 Chapter 82) sets forth “an equitable program for planning and financing public facilities needed to serve new growth.” The enabling legislation c alls for three integrated products: 1) Land Use Assumptions (LUA) for at least 20 years, 2) Capital Improvements Plan, which the City of Meridian calls Comprehensive Financial Plan (CFP), and 3) Development Impact Fees (DIFs). The LUA (see Appendix A) uses population and housing unit projections provided by City staff. In addition, the CFP and DIF for fire and police facilities require demographic data on nonresidential development. This document includes nonresidential land use assumptions such as jobs and floor area within the City of Meridian, along with service units by residential size thresholds. The CFP and DIF are in the middle section of this report, organized by chapters pertaining to each public facility type (i.e., parks/recreation, police and fire). Each chapter documents existing infrastructure standards, the projected need for improvements to accommodate new development, the updated DIF compared to current fees, revenue projections and funding strategy for growth -related infrastructure, and a CFP listing specific improvements to be completed by the City of Meridian. Unique Requirements of the Idaho Impact Fee Act The Idaho Development Impact Fee Act has several requirements not common in the enabling legislation of other states. This overview summarizes these unique requirements, which have been met by the City of Meridian, as documented in this study. First, as specified in 67 -8204(2) of the Idaho Act, “development impact fees shall be calculated on the basis of levels of service for public facilities . . . applicable to existing Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 545 of 576 2 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT development as well as new growth and development.” Second, Idaho requires a Capital Improvements Plan (aka CFP in Meridian) [see 67-8208]. The CFP requirements are summarized in this report, with more detailed information maintained by City staff responsible for each type of infrastructure funded by impact fees. Third, the Idaho Act states the cost per service unit (i.e., impact fee) may not exceed the cost of growth - related system improvements divided by the number of projected service units attributable to new development [see 67-8204(16)]. Fourth, Idaho requires a proportionate share determination [see 67 -8207]. The City of Meridian has complied by considering various types of applicable credits that may re duce the capital costs attributable to new development. Fifth, Idaho requires a Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee established to: a) assist in adopting land use assumptions, b) review the CFP and file written comments, c) monitor and evaluate implementation of the CFP, d) file periodic reports on perceived inequities in implementing the plan or imposing DIFs, and e) advise the governmental entity of the need to update the LUA, CFP and DIF study. Proposed Impact Fees Figure 1 summarizes the methods and cost components used for each type of public facility in Meridian’s 2019 impact fee study. City Council may change the proposed impact fees by eliminating infrastructure types, cost components, and/or specific capital improvements. If changes are ma de during the adoption process, Raftelis will update the fee study to be consistent with legislative policy decisions. Figure 1: Proposed Fee Methods and Cost Components Figure 2 summarizes proposed 2019 impact fees for new development in the City of Meridian.As discussed in Appendix A,Raftelis recommends that residential fees be imposed by dwelling size, base d on climate- controlled space. In contrast, the 2013 study used a “one size fits all” approach, whereby all housing units paid the same DIF.The 2019 size threshold that matches the average fee according to the 2013 method is a residential dwelling with 2501 to 3200 square feet. As shown below, the average fee per dwelling increased from $2,017 in 2013 to $2,943 in 2019, which is an increase of $926 (46%). In addition, the 2019 study recommends nonresidential fees by two general categories, Commercial and All Other types of nonresidential development. Commercial includes all buildings within a shopping center, plus stand-alone retail development and eating/drinking places (i.e., restaurants and bars). All Other includes industrial, warehousing, offices, business services, and personal services (i.e., every type of non -residential development not considered Commercial). The previous study had a single fee for all types of nonresidential Type of Impact Fee Service Area Incremental Expansion (current standards) Cost Allocation Parks and Recreation Facilities Citywide Park Improvements and Recreation Centers Residential Police Facilities Citywide Police Buildings Functional Population and Inbound Vehicle Trips to Nonresidential Development Fire Facilities Citywide Fire Stations and Apparatus Functional Population and Jobs Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 546 of 576 3 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT development.The average fee per square foot for nonresidential development increased from $0.47 in 2013 to $0.56 in 2019, which is an increase of $0.09 per square foot (20%). Figure 2: Proposed Impact Fee Schedule Citywide Service Area Park and Recreation Facilities Police Facilities Fire Facilities Proposed Total (2019) Existing Total (2013) Increase or Decrease % Change Residential (per housing unit) by Square Feet of Climate-Controlled Floor Area 1000 or less $781 $56 $258 $1,095 $2,017 ($922)-46% 1001 to 1500 $1,361 $98 $450 $1,909 $2,017 ($108)-5% 1501 to 2500 $1,770 $128 $585 $2,483 $2,017 $466 23% 2501 to 3200 $2,098 $152 $693 $2,943 $2,017 $926 46% 3201 or more $2,447 $177 $809 $3,433 $2,017 $1,416 70% Nonresidential (per square foot of building) Commercial $0.00 $0.24 $0.64 $0.88 $0.47 $0.41 87% All Other $0.00 $0.05 $0.41 $0.46 $0.47 ($0.01)-2% Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 547 of 576 4 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Parks and Recreation Impact Fees The 2019 updated impact fee for parks and recreation facilities will enable Meridian to maintain current infrastructure standards for improved acres of parks and floor area of recreation buildings. All parks and recreation facilities included in the impact fees have a citywide service area. Cost components are allocated 100% percent to residential development. Figure PR1 documents recent cost factors per acre for park improvements and land. Based on four park site acquisitions, land for parks in Meridian is expected to cost approximately $61,000 per acre. City staff confirmed this land cost factor is reasonable and consistent with a recent land v aluation of $65,000 per acre quoted for expansion of the City’s wastewater treatment plant. As shown in the table below, park improvements have been averaging $241,000 per acre. Figure PR1: Cost Factors for Park Improvements Citywide Parks Citywide parks have active amenities, such as a soccer/football/baseball fields, basketball/volleyball courts, and playgrounds that will attract patrons from the entire service area. As shown in Figure PR2, the current infrastructure standard is 2.91 acres per 1,000 residents. At the bottom of the table below is a needs analysis for citywide park improvements. To maintain current standards over the next ten years, Meridian will improve 102.3 acres of parks, expected to cost approximately $24.65 million. Estimated Costs Park Name Acres Land Improvements Discovery Park 27.00 $405,184 $8,261,000 Reta Huskey Park 8.92 $680,007 $1,495,126 Keith Bird Legacy Park 7.50 $1,274,995 $1,382,621 Hillsdale Park 9.53 $857,700 $1,622,282 Total Costs 52.95 $3,217,886 $12,761,029 Weighted Average Cost per Acre =>$61,000 $241,000 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 548 of 576 5 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Figure PR2: Citywide Parks Standards and Need for Improved Acres Existing Parks Improved Acres Julius M. Kleiner Park 58.2 Settlers Park 57.7 Heroes Park 30.1 Discovery Park 27.0 Fuller Park 23.2 Bear Creak Park 18.8 Tully Park 18.7 Storey Park & Bark Park 17.9 Gordon Harris Park 11.1 Hillsdale Park 9.5 Reta Husky Park 8.9 Jabil Soccer Fields 8.4 Keith Bird Legacy Park 7.5 Seasons Park 7.1 Chateau Park 6.7 Renaissance Park 6.5 Champion Park 6.0 Heritage MS Ball Fields 5.6 8th Street Park 2.8 Centennial Park 0.4 Total =>332.2 Allocation Factors for Parks Improvements Cost per Acre $241,000 Residential Proportionate Share 100% Service Units Population in 2019 114,102 Infrastructure Standards for Parks Improved Acres Residential (per person)0.00291 Park Needs Year Population Improved Acres Base 2019 114,102 332.2 Year 1 2020 121,126 352.7 Year 2 2021 126,812 369.2 Year 3 2022 132,163 384.8 Year 4 2023 136,845 398.4 Year 5 2024 140,190 408.2 Year 10 2029 149,248 434.5 Ten-Yr Increase 35,146 102.3 Growth Cost of Parks =>$24,654,300 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 549 of 576 6 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Recreation Buildings Figure PR3 lists current floor area for recreation centers. Based on input from the Impact Fee Advisory Committee, Meridian should expect to spend at least $225 per square foot to construct future recreation buildings. The lower portion of the table below indicates projected service units over the next ten years. To maintain current standards, Meridian will need 17,096 additional square feet of recreation building space, expected to cost approximately $3.85 million. Figure PR3: Infrastructure Standards and Needs for Recreation Buildings Revenue Credit Evaluation Currently the City of Meridian does not have any outstanding debt related to parks and recreation facilities. Therefore, a revenue credit for bond payments is not applicable. As shown in the cash flow analysis below, projected impact fee revenue matches the growth cost of new facilities. Because impact fees fully fund expected growth costs, there is no potential double-payment from other revenue sources. Proposed and Current Impact Fees At the top of Figure PR4 is a summary of the infrastructure needs due to growth. The projected need for acres of improved parks and square feet of recreation centers was addressed above. The need to acquire an additional five acres of land for parks is based on staff’s comparison of the existing inventory of undeveloped park sites (i.e., 97 acres) to the projected need for 102 additional acres over the next ten years. In addit ion to the growth cost of parks and recreation facilities, impact fees include the cost of professional services related to the CFP (authorized by the Idaho impact fee enabling legislation), less the projected park impact fee fund Existing Recreation Centers Square Feet Meridian Community Center 4,200 1 Meridian Homecourt 51,303 1 Total to Include in Current Standards 55,503 Allocation Factors for Recreation Centers Building plus Land Cost per Square Foot*$225 Residential Proportionate Share 100% 2019 Meridian Population 114,102 * Based on local developer estimate. Square Feet Residential (per person)0.49 Recreation Center Needs Year Population Square Feet Base 2019 114,102 55,503 Year 1 2020 121,126 58,920 Year 2 2021 126,812 61,686 Year 3 2022 132,163 64,288 Year 4 2023 136,845 66,566 Year 5 2024 140,190 68,193 Year 10 2029 149,248 72,599 Ten-Yr Increase 35,146 17,096 Growth Cost for Recreation Buildings =>$3,847,000 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 550 of 576 7 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT balance at the end of the current fiscal year. The net growth cost of $26,168,471 divided by the projected increase in population from 2019 to 2029, yields a cost of $744 per service unit. To be consistent with 67-8204(16) of the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act, impact fees are derived using the cost per service unit multiplied by the average number of service units per dwelling. The row highlighted light green indicates the updated impact fee for an average-size dwelling, which assumes 2.82 persons per housing unit. The latter was derived by dividing the projected increase in population by the projected increase in housing units over the next ten years. Please see Appendix A for supporting documentation on the average number of persons by dwelling size in Meridian (note: the person per housing unit values shown in Figure A4 were adjusted downward by multiplying the value for each size threshold by the ratio of 2.82 divided by 3.11). The blue arrow shown in the table below compares the updated fee for the average size dwelling to the average impact fee per housing unit based on the allocation methodology from the 2013 impact fee study. In contrast to the “one size fits all” flat fee for all dwellings, the updated methodology proposes lower impact fees for smaller, more affordable units, along with a higher fee for dwellings with 3201 or more square feet of climate-controlled space. Figure PR4: Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Schedule 2019 Input Variables Infrastructure Type Infrastructure Units Growth Quantity Over Ten Years Cost Factor per Unit Growth Cost (rounded) Park Improvements acres 102 $241,000 $24,654,000 Park Land acres 5 $61,000 $305,000 Recreation Centers sq ft 17,096 $225 $3,847,000 Total =>$28,806,000 Professional Services Cost =>$18,603 Less Projected Fund Balance 9/30/2019 =>-$2,656,132 Net Growth Cost =>$26,168,471 Population Increase 2019 to 2029 35,146 Cost per Service Unit $744 Residential Impact Fees (per dwelling) Square Feet of Climate-Controlled Space Persons per Housing Unit Proposed Parks & Recreation Fee Current Fees Increase or Decrease % Change 1000 or less 1.05 $781 $1,113 ($332)-30% 1001 to 1500 1.83 $1,361 $1,113 $248 22% 1501 to 2500 2.38 $1,770 $1,113 $657 59% 2501 to 3200 2.82 $2,098 $1,113 $985 88% 3201 or more 3.29 $2,447 $1,113 $1,334 120% Comparison to 2013 Method Housing Unit Increase 2019 to 2029 12,466 Impact Fee per Housing Unit $2,099 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 551 of 576 8 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Forecast of Revenues for Parks and Recreation Figure PR5 indicates Meridian should receive approximately $26.15 million in parks and recreation impact fee revenue over the next ten years, if actual development matches the projections documented in Appendix A. To the extent the rate of development either accelerates or slows down, there will be a corresponding change in the need for infrastructure and impact fee revenue. Figure PR5: Projected Impact Fee Revenue Ten-Year Growth Cost =>$26,168,471 Parks Impact Fee Revenue Average Residential $2,098 Year per housing unit Hsg Units Base 2019 42,345 Year 1 2020 44,445 Year 2 2021 46,145 Year 3 2022 47,746 Year 4 2023 49,145 Year 5 2024 50,145 Year 10 2029 54,811 Ten-Yr Increase 12,466 Projected Revenue =>$26,150,000 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 552 of 576 9 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Comprehensive Financial Plan for Parks and Recreation As specified in 67-8203(29), development impact fees in Meridian exclude costs to provide better service to existing development. Existing parks and recreation centers are fully utilized and there is no surplus capacity for future development. City staff recommends the improvements listed in Figure PR6 to accommodate additional development over the next ten years. Total impact fee funding of approximately $28.8 million represents a growth share of 80%, requiring approximately $7.28 million from other revenue sources over the next ten years. Figure PR6: Summary of Ten-Year CFP for Parks and Recreation Needed Planned Improved Acres 102.3 151 Building Sq Ft 17,096 22,000 FY Description Amount Units Cost 2020 West Meridian Regional Park - Design $500,000 2022 West Meridian Regional Park - Construction 47 acres $5,147,500 2021 New Community Center - Design & Construction Documents $500,000 2023 New Community Center - Construction 22,000 square feet $5,000,000 2027 Margaret Aldape Park - Design $994,000 2029 Margaret Aldape Park - Construction 70 acres $10,012,500 2021 Discovery Park, Phase 2 - Design $500,000 2023 Discovery Park, Phase 2 - Construction 25 $5,160,000 2023 Discovery Park, Phase 3 - Design $500,000 2025 Discovery Park, Phase 3 - Construction 25 acres $5,160,000 2022 Brundage/Graycliff Park - Design $185,000 2024 Brundage/Graycliff Park - Construction 9 acres $1,906,500 2021 Additional Land Acquisition 5 acres $525,000 Total Cost =>$36,090,500 Growth Cost Funded by Impact Fees =>$28,806,000 Growth Share =>80% Existing Development Share to be Funded by Other Revenues =>$7,284,500 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 553 of 576 10 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Police Impact Fees The City of Meridian will use an incremental expansion cost method to maintain existing infrastructure standards for police buildings. Proportionate Share In Meridian, police and fire infrastructure standards, projected needs, and development fees are based on both residential and nonresidential development. As shown in Figure P1, functional population was used to allocate public safety infrastructure and costs to residential and nonresidential development . Functional population is like the U.S. Census Bureau’s "daytime population," by accounting for people living and working in a jurisdiction. It also considers commuting patterns and time spent at residential versus nonresidential locations. Residents that don't work are assigned 20 hours per day to residential development and four hours per day to nonresidential development (annualized averages). Residents that work in Meridian are assigned 14 hours to residential development and 10 hours to nonresiden tial development. Residents that work outside Meridian are assigned 14 hours to residential development. Inflow commuters are assigned 10 hours to nonresidential development. Based on 2015 functional population data for Meridian, the cost allocation for residential development is 73% while nonresidential development accounts for 27% of the demand for fire infrastructure. Figure P1: Functional Population Functional Population Cost Allocation for Public Safety Demand Units in 2015 Demand Person Residential Hours/Day Hours Population*91,360 61%Residents Not Working 55,961 20 1,119,220 39%Resident Workers**35,399 20%Worked in City**7,231 14 101,234 80%Worked Outside City**28,168 14 394,352 Residential Subtotal 1,614,806 Residential Share =>73% Nonresidential Non-working Residents 55,961 4 223,844 Jobs Located in City**36,676 20%Residents Working in City**7,231 10 72,310 80%Non-Resident Workers (inflow commuters)29,445 10 294,450 Nonresidential Subtotal 590,604 Nonresidential Share =>27% TOTAL 2,205,410* 2015 U.S. Census Bureau population estimate. ** 2015 Inflow/Outflow Analysis, OnTheMap web application, U.S. Census Bureau data for all jobs. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 554 of 576 11 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Excluded Costs Police development fees in Meridian exclude costs to meet existing needs and strict er safety, efficiency, environmental or regulatory standards. The City’s CFP addresses the cost of these excluded items. Also excluded from the police development fees are public safety vehicles and equipment that do not meet the minimum useful life requirement in Idaho’s Impact Fee Act. Current Use and Available Capacity In Meridian, police facilities are fully utilized and there is no surplus capacity for future development. Meridian has determined that police building space will require expansion to a ccommodate future development. Police Facilities, Service Units, and Standards Police development fees in Meridian are based on the same level of service provided to existing development. Figure P2 inventories police buildings in Meridian. Because the training center is also used by the Fire Department, floor area was reduced to indicate the portion used by Meridian police. For residential development, Meridian will use year-round population within the service areas to derive current police infrastructure standards. For nonresidential development, Meridian will use inbound, average - weekday, vehicle trips as the service unit. Figure P2 indicates the allocation of police building space to residential and nonresidential development, along with FY18 -19 service units in Meridian. Vehicle trips to nonresidential development are based on floor area estimates for industrial, commercial, institutional, office and other services, as documented in the Land Use Assumptions. For police development fees, Meridian will use a cost factor of $333 per square foot (provided by City staff). The cost factor includes design and construction management. Based on FY18 -19 service units, the standard in Meridian is 0.26 square feet of police building floor area per person in the service area. For nonresidential development, Meridian’s standard is 0.06 square feet of police building per inbound vehicle trip to nonresidential development, on an average weekday. Figure P2: Meridian Police Buildings and Standards Police Buildings Square Feet PSTC (half)7,250 Admin Building 33,000 TOTAL 40,250 Source: City of Meridian Police Department. Police Buildings Standards Residential Nonresidential Proportionate Share (based on functional population)73%27% Growth Indicator Population Avg Wkdy Veh Trips to Nonres Dev Service Units in FY18-19 114,102 179,607 Square Feet per Service Unit 0.26 0.06 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 555 of 576 12 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Police Infrastructure Needs Idaho’s development fee enabling legislation requires jurisdictions to convert land use assumptions into service units and the corresponding need for additional infrastructure over the next ten years. As shown in Figure P3, projected population and inbound nonresidential vehicle trips drive the need for police buildings and vehicles. Meridian will need 12,161 additional square feet of police buildings. The ten -year, growth- related capital cost of police buildings is approximately $4.05 million. Figure P3: Police Facilities Needed to Accommodate Growth Revenue Credit Evaluation Currently the City of Meridian does not have any outstanding debt related to police facilities. Therefore, a revenue credit for bond payments is not applicable. As shown in the cash flow analysis below, projected impact fee revenue matches the growth cost of new facilities. Based on the City of Meridian’s legislative policy decision to fully fund expected growth costs from impact fees, there is no potentia l double-payment from other revenue sources. Police Development Fees Infrastructure standards and cost factors for police are summarized in the upper portion of Figure P4. The conversion of infrastructure needs and costs per service unit into a cost per d evelopment unit is also shown in the table below. For residential development, average number of persons in a housing unit provides the necessary conversion. Persons per housing unit, by size threshold are documented in the Land Use Assumptions. For nonresidential development, trip generation rates by type of development are from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE 2017). To ensure the analysis is based on travel demand associated with nonresidential development within Meridian, trip ends (ent ering and exiting) are converted to inbound trips using a basic 50% adjustment factor. Police Infrastructure Standards and Capital Costs Buildings - Residential 0.26 Sq Ft per person Buildings - Nonresidential 0.06 Sq Ft per trip Police Buildings Cost $333 per square foot Infrastructure Needed Veh Trips to Police Year Population Nonres in Meridian Buildings (sq ft) Base 2019 114,102 179,607 40,250 Year 1 2020 121,126 184,062 42,328 Year 2 2021 126,812 188,819 44,080 Year 3 2022 132,163 193,625 45,749 Year 4 2023 136,845 198,637 47,258 Year 5 2024 140,190 203,714 48,427 Year 10 2029 149,248 231,013 52,411 Ten-Yr Increase 35,146 51,406 12,161 Growth Cost of Police Buildings =>$4,050,000 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 556 of 576 13 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT In addition to the growth cost of police facilities, impact fees include the cost of professional services related to the CFP (authorized by the Idaho Impact Fee Act), less the projected police impact fee fund balance expected at the end of the current fiscal year. The net growth cost of $2,633,140, divided by the projected increase in population from 2019 to 2029, yields a cost of $54 per residential service unit. Impa ct fees are derived using the cost per service unit multiplied by the average number of service units per development unit. The row highlighted light blue indicates the updated police fee for an average -size dwelling is $152 (truncated), which assumes 2.82 persons per housing unit. The latter was derived by dividing the projected increase in population by the projected increase in housing units over the next ten years. Please see Appendix A for supporting documentation on the average number of persons by dwelling size in Meridian (note: the person per housing unit values shown in Figure A4 were adjusted downward by multiplying the value for each size threshold by the ratio of 2.82 divided by 3.11). The blue arrow shown in the table below compares the updated fee for the average size dwelling to the average impact fee per housing unit based on the allocation methodology from the 2013 impact fee study. In contrast to the “one size fits all” flat fee for all dwellings, the updated methodology proposes lowe r impact fees for smaller, more affordable units, along with a higher fee for dwellings with 3201 or more square feet of climate -controlled space. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 557 of 576 14 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Figure P4: Police Impact Fees per Development Unit Projected Revenue for Police Facilities Over the next ten years, police development fee revenue is projected to approximately match the growth cost of police infrastructure, which has a ten-year total cost of approximately $2.6 million (see the upper portion of Figure P5). The table below indicates Meridian should receive approximately $2.5 million in police 2019 Input Variables Infrastructure Type Infrastructure Units Growth Quantity Over Ten Years Cost Factor per Unit Growth Cost (rounded) Police Buildings square feet 12,161 $333 $4,050,000 Outdoor Training Facility 23%$690,000 Total =>$4,740,000 Professional Services Cost =>$18,603 Less Projected Fund Balance 9/30/2019 =>-$2,125,463 Net Growth Cost =>$2,633,140 Residential 73% Nonresidential 27% Residential $1,922,192 Nonresidential $710,948 Cost per Service Unit Residential (persons)35,146 $54 Nonresidential (vehicle trips)51,406 $13 Residential Impact Fees (per housing unit) Square Feet of Climate- Controlled Space Persons per Housing Unit Proposed Police Facilities Fees Current Fees Increase or Decrease % Change 1000 or less 1.05 $56 $223 ($167)-75% 1001 to 1500 1.83 $98 $223 ($125)-56% 1501 to 2500 2.38 $128 $223 ($95)-43% 2501 to 3200 2.82 $152 $223 ($71)-32% 3201 or more 3.29 $177 $223 ($46)-21% Nonresidential Impact Fees (square foot of building) Type Avg Wkdy Veh Trip Ends per KSF Trip Adjustment Factors Proposed Police Facilities Fees Current Fees Increase or Decrease % Change Commercial 37.75 50%$0.24 $0.12 $0.12 100% All Other 9.00 50%$0.05 $0.12 ($0.07)-58% Comparison to 2013 Method Housing Unit Increase 2019 to 2029 12,466 Impact Fee per Housing Unit $154 Nonresidential Floor Area Increase 2019 to 2029 6,960,000 Impact Fee per Square Foot $0.10 Cost Allocation Allocated Cost by Land Use Growth 2019 to 2029 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 558 of 576 15 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT development fee revenue, if actual development matches the land use assumptions. To the extent the rate of development either accelerates or slows down, there will be a corresponding change in the need f or infrastructure and development fee revenue. Figure P5: Police Development Fee Revenue Comprehensive Financial Plan for Police City staff recommends the improvements listed in Figure P6 to accommodate additional development over the next ten years.Impact fees will pay for approximately $4.74 million, representing a growth share of 59%. Other revenue sources will be required to fund approximately $3.26 million in police facilities over the next ten years. Figure P6: Summary of Ten-Year CFP for Police Ten-Year Growth Cost of Police Facilities =>$2,633,140 Police Impact Fee Revenue Average Residential Industrial Commercial Institutional Office & Other Services $152 $50 $240 $50 $50 per housing unit per 1000 Sq Ft per 1000 Sq Ftper 1000 Sq Ft per 1000 Sq Ft Year Hsg Units KSF KSF KSF KSF Base 2019 42,345 9,070 4,890 4,450 5,890 Year 1 2020 44,445 9,300 5,010 4,560 6,040 Year 2 2021 46,145 9,540 5,140 4,680 6,190 Year 3 2022 47,746 9,780 5,270 4,800 6,350 Year 10 2029 54,811 11,670 6,290 5,720 7,580 Ten-Yr Increase 12,466 2,600 1,400 1,270 1,690 Projected Revenue =>$1,895,000 $130,000 $336,000 $64,000 $85,000 Total Projected Revenues (rounded) =>$2,510,000 Buildings Description Square Feet Total Cost Training Facility Classroom 3,000 $1,000,000 Administrative Building Expansion Phase 1 3,000 $1,000,000 Administrative Building Expansion Phase 2 3,000 $1,000,000 Substation 6,000 $2,000,000 Total =>15,000 $5,000,000 Cost per Square Foot =>$333 Outdoor Facilities Description Cost Outdoor Training Facility $3,000,000 Total =>$8,000,000 Growth Cost Funded by Impact Fees =>$4,740,000 Growth Share Funded by Impact Fees =>59% Share to be Funded by Other Revenues =>$3,260,000 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 559 of 576 16 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Fire Impact Fees After evaluating calls for service data to general types of development, Raftelis recommends functional population to allocate the cost of additional fire infrastructure to residential and nonresidential development (see Figure P1 above and related text). Fire development fees in Meridian are based on the same level of service currently provided to existing development. Existing Standards for Fire Facilities Figure F1 inventories Fire Department buildings in Meridian. Because the training center is also used by the Police Department, floor area was reduced to indicate the portion used by Meridian Fire Department. The standard for fire buildings is 0.44 square feet per person and 0.46 square feet per job. Figure F1: Existing Fire Buildings Development fees will be used to expand the fleet of fire vehicles and purchase communications equipment with a useful life of at least ten years. Figure F2 lists fire vehicles and communications equipment currently used by the Meridian Fire Department. Following the same methodology used for fire buildings, the total cost of fire vehicles and equipment was allocated 73% to residential and 27% to nonresidential development in Meridian. As shown below, every additional resident will require M eridian to spend approximately $62 for additional fire vehicles and equipment. Every additional job requires the City to spend approximately $64 for additional fire vehicles and equipment. Fire Stations Square Feet Fire Station # 1 (540 E. Franklin Rd)11,700 Fire Station # 3 (3545 N. Locust Grove)7,040 Fire Station # 2 (2401 N. Ten Mile Rd)6,770 Fire Station # 4 (2515 S. Eagle Rd)7,077 Fire Station # 5 (N. Linder Rd)7,360 Fire Station # 6 0 PSTC (half)7,250 Training Tower @ Station #1 6,523 Fire Safety Center (1901 Leighfield Dr)1,744 Fire Admin Space (City Hall)13,511 TOTAL 68,975 Allocation Factors for Fire Stations Residential Share 73%Functional Nonresidential Share 27%Population Population in 2019 114,102 Jobs in 2019 40,575 Infrastructure Standards for Fire Stations Square Feet Residential (per person)0.44 Nonresidential (per job)0.46 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 560 of 576 17 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Figure F2: Existing Standards for Fire Vehicles Fire Infrastructure Needs The City’s Comprehensive Plan and website describe existing fire facilities. In Meridian, fire facilities are fully utilized and there is no surplus capacity for future development. The City has determined that fire facilities will require expansion to accommodate future development. As specified in 67-8203(29), development impact fees in Meridian exclude costs to repair, upgrade, update, expand or replace existing capital improvements to provide better service to existing development. To accommodate projected development over the next ten years, Meridian will expand fire buildings by 20,859 square feet and spend $2.93 million to expand the fleet of fire vehicles. Fire Apparatus and Equipment Coding Total Cost Engines FE $5,148,000 Ladder Truck LT $1,600,000 Pickup Trucks PT $539,659 Other Vehicles OV $287,700 Communications Equipment CE $2,112,284 TOTAL $9,687,643 Allocation Factors for Fire Apparatus and Communications Residential Share 73%Functional Nonresidential Share 27%population Population in 2019 114,102 Jobs in 2019 40,575 Infrastructure Standards for Fire Apparatus and Communications Apparatus and Communications Residential (per person)$61.98 Nonresidential (per job)$64.46 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 561 of 576 18 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Figure F3: Growth-Related Need for Fire Facilities Revenue Credit Evaluation Currently the City of Meridian does not have any outstanding debt related to fire facilities. Therefore, a revenue credit for bond payments is not applicable. As shown in the cash flow analysis below, projected impact fee revenue matches the growth cost of new facilities. Based on the City of Meridian’s legislative policy decision to fully fund expected growth costs from impact fees, there is no potential double -payment from other revenue sources. Current and Proposed Fire Impact Fees Figure F4 indicates proposed impact fees for fire facilities in Meridian. Residential fees are derived from average number of persons per housing unit and the cost per person. Nonresidential fees are based on average jobs per 1,000 square feet of floor area and the cost per job. The cost factors for fire facilities are summarized in the upper portion of Figure F4. Persons per unit, by dwelling size, are based on local data, as discussed in the Land Use Assumptions. For nonresidential development, average jobs per thous and square feet of floor area are also documented in the Land Use Assumptions. To be consistent with 67-8204(16) of the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act, impact fees are derived using the cost per service unit multiplied by the average number of service units per development unit. The row highlighted light orange indicates the updated impact fee for an average-size dwelling is $693 (truncated), which assumes 2.82 persons per housing unit and a cost of $246 per additional person. Please see Appendix Fire Infrastructure Standards and Capital Costs Fire Stations - Residential 0.44 Sq Ft per household Fire Stations - Nonresidential 0.46 Sq Ft per job Fire Station Cost $535 per square foot Fire Apparatus/Communications - Residential $61.98 Cost per person Fire Apparatus/Communications - Nonres $64.46 Cost per job Facilities Needed Population Meridian Sq Ft of Fire Fire Apparatus and Year Jobs Stations Communications Base 2019 114,102 40,575 68,975 $9,687,643 Year 1 2020 121,126 41,612 72,551 $10,189,837 Year 2 2021 126,812 42,677 75,549 $10,610,907 Year 3 2022 132,163 43,768 78,411 $11,012,890 Year 4 2023 136,845 44,887 80,990 $11,375,214 Year 5 2024 140,190 46,035 82,993 $11,656,541 Year 6 2025 143,578 47,214 85,030 $11,942,532 Year 7 2026 144,996 48,421 86,209 $12,108,228 Year 8 2027 146,413 49,659 87,403 $12,275,860 Year 9 2028 147,831 50,929 88,611 $12,445,618 Year 10 2029 149,248 52,231 89,834 $12,617,376 Ten -Yr Increase 35,146 11,656 20,859 $2,929,733 Cost of Fire Stations =>$11,160,000 Cost of Fire Apparatus and Communications =>$2,930,000 Total Growth Cost =>$14,090,000 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 562 of 576 19 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT A for supporting documentation on the average number of persons by dwelling size in Meridian (note: the person per housing unit values shown in Figure A4 were adjusted downward by multiplying the value for each size threshold by the ratio of 2.82 divided by 3.1 1). The blue arrow shown in the table below compares the updated fee for the average size dwelling to the average impact fee per housing unit based on the allocation methodology from the 2013 impact fee study. In contrast to the “one size fits all” flat fee of $695 for all dwellings, the updated methodology proposes lower impact fees for smaller, more affordable units, along with a higher fee for dwellings with 3201 or more square feet of climate-controlled space. Proposed nonresidential development fees for fire facilities are shown in the column with light orange shading. The 2019 study recommends nonresidential fees by two general categories, Commercial and All Other types of nonresidential development. Commercial includes all buildings within a shopp ing center, plus stand-alone retail development and eating/drinking places (i.e., restaurants and bars). All Other includes industrial, warehousing, offices, business services, and personal services (i.e., every type of non -residential development not considered Commercial). The previous study had a single fee for all types of nonresidential development.The average fire impact fee per square foot for nonresidential development increased from $0.35 in 2013 to $0.46 in 2019. Based on the 2019 fee schedule, a new warehouse would be in the category of All Other. This fee category assumes 1.50 jobs per thousand square feet of floor area. To convert the fee to an amount per square foot, we divide by 1000 then multiply by the cost factor per job ($274). The result is $0.41 (truncated) per square foot. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 563 of 576 20 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Figure F4: Fee Schedule for Fire Facilities 2019 Input Variables Infrastructure Type Infrastructure Units Growth Quantity Over Ten Years Cost Factor per Unit Growth Cost (rounded) Fire Stations square feet 20,859 $535 $11,160,000 Fire Apparatus dollars $2,930,000 Total =>$14,090,000 Professional Services Cost =>$18,603 Less Projected Fund Balance 9/30/2019 =>-$2,241,236 Net Growth Cost =>$11,867,367 Residential 73% Nonresidential 27% Residential $8,663,178 Nonresidential $3,204,189 Cost per Service Unit Residential (persons)35,146 $246 Nonresidential (jobs)11,656 $274 Residential Impact Fees (per housing unit) Square Feet of Climate- Controlled Space Persons per Hsg Unit Proposed Fire Facilities Fee Current Fees Increase or Decrease % Change 1000 or less 1.05 $258 $681 ($423)-62% 1001 to 1500 1.83 $450 $681 ($231)-34% 1501 to 2500 2.38 $585 $681 ($96)-14% 2501 to 3200 2.82 $693 $681 $12 2% 3201 or more 3.29 $809 $681 $128 19% Nonresidential Impact Fees (square foot of building) Type Jobs per 1,000 Sq Ft Proposed Fire Facilities Fee Current Fees Increase or Decrease % Change Commercial 2.34 $0.64 $0.35 $0.29 83% All Other 1.50 $0.41 $0.35 $0.06 17% Comparison to 2013 Method Housing Unit Increase 2019 to 2029 12,466 Impact Fee per Housing Unit $695 Nonresidential Sq Ft Increase 2019 to 2029 6,960,000 Impact Fee per Square Foot)$0.46 Cost Allocation Allocated Cost by Land Use Growth 2019 to 2029 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 564 of 576 21 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Projected Revenue for Fire Facilities Over the next ten years, fire development fee revenue is projected to approximately match the growth cost of fire infrastructure, which has a ten-year growth cost of $11,867,367 (see the upper portion of Figure F5). The table below indicates Meridian should receive approximately $11.82 million in fire development fee revenue, if actual development matches the land use assumptions. The revenue projection assumes implementation of the proposed fire fees and that development from 2019 to 2029 is consistent w ith the land use assumptions described in Appendix A. To the extent the rate of development either accelerates or slows down, there will be a corresponding change in the development fee revenue. Figure F5: Fire Development Fee Revenue Ten-Year Cost of Growth-Related Fire Facilities =>$11,867,367 Fire Impact Fee Revenue Average Residential Industrial Commercial Institutional Office and Other Services $693 $410 $640 $410 $410 Year per housing unit per 1000 Sq Ft per 1000 Sq Ft per 1000 Sq Ft per 1000 Sq Ft Hsg Units KSF KSF KSF KSF Base 2019 42,345 9,070 4,890 4,450 5,890 Year 1 2020 44,445 9,300 5,010 4,560 6,040 Year 2 2021 46,145 9,540 5,140 4,680 6,190 Year 3 2022 47,746 9,780 5,270 4,800 6,350 Year 4 2023 49,145 10,030 5,410 4,920 6,510 Year 5 2024 50,145 10,290 5,550 5,040 6,680 Year 6 2025 51,159 10,550 5,690 5,170 6,850 Year 7 2026 52,071 10,820 5,830 5,310 7,030 Year 8 2027 52,984 11,100 5,980 5,440 7,210 Year 9 2028 53,898 11,380 6,140 5,580 7,390 Year 10 2029 54,811 11,670 6,290 5,720 7,580 Ten-Yr Increase 12,466 2,600 1,400 1,270 1,690 Projected Revenue =>$8,640,000 $1,070,000 $900,000 $520,000 $690,000 Total Projected Revenues (rounded) =>$11,820,000 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 565 of 576 22 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Comprehensive Financial Plan for Fire Facilities Using impact fee funding over the next ten years, Figure F6 indicates that Meridian plans to expand fire station floor area by approximately 25,000 square feet. Meridian will also purchase additional fire vehicles costing approximately $4.38 million. The total cost for these projects is approximately $17.75 million. The growth cost funded by impact fees is $14.09 million over ten years, which is 79% of the total cost. An additional $3.66 million in other revenues wil l be required to fully fund the Fire Department’s CFP for growth-related improvements. Figure F6: Summary of Ten-Year CFP for Fire Facilities Fire Stations Square Feet Total Cost Purchase Land for Fire Station #7 $500,000 Design Fire Station #7 $800,000 Build Fire Station #7 12,500 $5,387,500 Purchase Land for Fire Station #8 $250,000 Design Fire Station #8 $800,000 Build Fire Station #8 12,500 $5,637,500 Total =>25,000 $13,375,000 Cost per Sq Ft Based on Stations #7 & #8 =>$535 Fire Apparatus Units Total Cost Quint Truck 1 $1,600,000 Heavy Rescue Vehicle 1 $800,000 Fire Engine Station #7 1 $572,000 Fire Engine Station #8 1 $572,000 Vehicle for EMS Captain 1 $63,000 Vehicle for Fire Inspector/Investigator 1 $63,000 Vehicle for Battalion Chiefs 1 $63,000 Alternative Response Unit 2 $642,000 Total =>9 $4,375,000 Total =>$17,750,000 Growth Cost Funded by Impact Fees =>$14,090,000 Growth Share =>79% Funded by Other Revenues =>$3,660,000 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 566 of 576 23 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Fee Implementation and Administration Consistent with best practices and Idaho’s enabling legislation,Meridian updates capital improvements and development impact fees every five years. In addition, some jurisdictions make annual adjustments for inflation using a price index like the Engineering News Record (ENR) Construction Cost Index published by McGraw-Hill Companies. This index could be applied to the adopted impact fee schedule, reviewed by the Advisory Committee, then approved by City Council. If cost estimates or demand indicators change significantly, the City should redo the fee calculations. Another best practice is to spend impact fees as soon as possible, tracking funds according to first in, first out accounting, using aggregate rather than project-specific tracking. Impact fees and accrued interest are maintained in a separate fund that is not comingled with other revenues. In Idaho, an annual report is mandatory, indicating impact fee collections, expenditures, and fund balances by type of infrastructure. Cost of CFP Preparation As stated in Idaho’s enabling legislation, a surcharge on the collection of development impact fees may be used to fund the cost of preparing the CFP that is attributable to the impact fee determination. This minor cost ($18,603 per infrastructure type) was added to the 2019 Meridian impact fees. Development Categories Proposed impact fees for residential development are by square feet of climate-controlled space, excluding porches, garage and unfinished space, such as basements and attics. For an apartment building, the average size threshold is derived for an entire building. The recommended procedure is to identify the aggregate climate-controlled floor area for the entire building, divided by the number of dwelling units in the building. Apartment complexes and some residential development provide common area s for use by residents, such as exercise rooms and clubhouses. Common areas for the private use of residents are ancillary uses to the dwelling units and not subject to additional impact fees. Also, Section 67 -8204(20) of the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act states that an addition to an existing residential building, that does not increase the number of service units, should be exempt from additional impact fees. Given the relatively small fee increase across size thresholds and the high transaction cost to assess fees for additions to residential buildings, Raftelis recommends that additions to residential buildings should not be subject to additional impact fees. The two general nonresidential development categories in the proposed impact fee schedule can be used for all new construction within Meridian. Nonresidential development categories represent general groups of land uses that share similar average weekday vehicle trip generation rates and job density (i.e. jobs per 1,000 square feet of floor area), as documented in Appendix A. “Commercial” includes retail development and eating/drinking places (i.e., restaurants and bars). All land uses within a shopping center will pay the impact fee for commercial development. All Other includes industrial,warehousing, offices, business services, and personal services (i.e., every type of non-residential development not considered Commercial). An applicant may submit an independent study to document unique demand indicators (i.e., service units per development unit). The independent study should be prepared by a professional engineer or certified planner and use the same type of input variables as those in Meridian’s impact fee study. For residential development, impact fees are based on average persons per housing unit. For nonresidential development, impact fees are based on inbound average weekday vehicle trips per 1,000 square feet of floor area, and the Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 567 of 576 24 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT average number of jobs per 1,000 square feet of floor area. The independent fee study will be rev iewed by City staff and can be accepted as the basis for a unique fee calculation. If staff determines the independent fee study is not reasonable, the applicant may appeal the administrative decision to Meridian’s elected officials for their consideration. Credits and Reimbursements A general requirement that is common to impact fee methodologies is the evaluation of credits. A revenue credit may be necessary to avoid potential double payment situations arising from one -time impact fees plus on-going payment of other revenues that may also fund growth -related capital improvements. The determination of revenue credits is dependent upon the impact fee methodology used in the cost analysis. Policies and procedures related to site-specific credits should be addressed in the ordinance that establishes the impact fees. Project-level improvements, required as part of the development approval process, are not eligible for credits against impact fees. If a developer constructs a system improvement included in th e fee calculations, it will be necessary to either reimburse the developer or provide a credit against the fees. The latter option is more difficult to administer because it creates unique fees for specific geographic areas. Based on national experience,Raftelis recommends a jurisdiction establish a reimbursement agreement with the developer that constructs a system improvement. The reimbursement agreement should be limited to a payback period of no more than ten years and the City should not pay intere st on the outstanding balance. The developer must provide documentation of the actual cost incurred for the system improvement. The City should only agree to pay the lesser of the actual construction cost or the estimated cost used in the impact fee analysis. If the City pays more than the cost used in the fee analysis, there will be insufficient fee revenue. Reimbursement agreements should only obligate the City to reimburse developers annually according to actual fee collections from the benefiting area. The supporting documentation for each type of impact fee describes the types of infrastructure considered to be system improvements. Site specific credits or developer reimbursements for one type of system improvement does not negate an impact fee for other system improvements. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 568 of 576 25 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Appendix A: Land Use Assumptions Appendix A contains the land use assumptions for Meridian’s 2019 DIF update. The CFP must be developed in coordination with the Advisory Committee and utilize land use assumptions most recently adopted by the appropriate land planning agency [see Idaho Code 67-8206(2)]. Idaho’s enabling legislation defines land use assumptions as: “a description of the service area and projections of land uses, densities, intensities, and population in the service area over at least a 20-year period.” Service Areas To ensure a substantial benefit to new development paying impact fees, the City of Meridian has evaluated collection and expenditure zones for public facilities that may have distinct benefit or service areas. In the City of Meridian, impact fees for parks/recreation, police and fire facilities will benefit new development throughout the entire incorporated area. Raftelis recommends o ne citywide service area for Meridian impact fees. Idaho Code 67-8203(26) defines “service area” as: “Any defined geographic area identified by a governmental entity, or by intergovernmental agreement, in which specific public facilities provide service to development within the area defined, on the basis of sound planning or engineering principles, or both.” The City’s adopted Future Land Use Map indicates land uses, densities, and intensities of development, as required by Idaho Code 67-8203(16). The service area is defined as all land within the city limits of Meridian, as modified over time. Summary of Growth Indicators Population, housing unit,jobs and nonresidential floor area are the “service units” or demand indicators that will be used to evaluate the need for growth-related infrastructure. The demographic data and development projections discussed below will also be used to demonstrate proportionality. All land use assumptions are consistent with Meridian’s Comprehensive Plan. In contrast to th e Comprehensive Plan, which is more general and has a long-range horizon, development impact fees require more specific quantitative analysis and have a short-range focus. Typically, impact fee studies look out five to ten years, with the expectation that fees will be periodically updated (e.g. every 5 years).Infrastructure standards will be calibrated using fiscal year 2018-19 data. In Meridian, the fiscal year begins on October 1st. Key development projections for the City of Meridian are housing unit s and nonresidential floor area, as shown in Figure A1. These projections will be used to estimate development fee revenue and to indicate the anticipated need for growth-related infrastructure. The goal is to have reasonable projections without being overly concerned with precision. Because impact fee methods are designed to reduce sensitivity to development projections in the determination of the proportionate -share fee amounts, if actual development is slower than projected, fee revenue will decline,but so will the need for growth-related infrastructure. In contrast, if development is faster than anticipated, the City will receive an increase in fee revenue, but will also need to accelerate infrastructure improvements to keep pace with the actual rat e of development. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 569 of 576 26 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Population and housing unit projections were provided by City staff. During the next ten years, the impact fee study assumes Meridian’s population increase at a growth rate of approximately 2.7% per year. Over the next ten years, jobs are expected to increase at a growth rate of approximately 2.6% per year, which is from the Communities in Motion employment forecast from 2010 to 2040. Figure A1:Annual Development Projections Proportionate Share The term “proportionate” is found throughout Idaho’s Development Impact Fee Act. For example, Idaho Code 67 - 8202(2) states the intent to, “Promote orderly growth and development by establishing uniform standards by which local governments may require that those who benefit from new growth and development pay a proportionate share of the cost of new public facilities needed to serve new growth and development;” Because DIFS must be proportionate, jurisdictions derive fees for various land uses per unit of development, as stated in Idaho Code 67-8404(17). Meridian, Idaho FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21-22 FY23-24 FY28-29 FY38-39 Fiscal Year Begins Oct 1st 2019 2020 2021 2022 2024 2029 2039 Base Yr 1 2 3 5 10 20 Total Population City of Meridian 114,102 121,126 126,812 132,163 140,190 149,248 164,187 Annual Increase 7.2%6.2%4.7%4.2%2.4%1.0%1.0% Housing Units Single Family 35,911 37,649 39,056 40,381 42,367 46,229 54,516 Annual Increase 5.6%4.8%3.7%3.4%2.0%1.7%1.7% Multi-Family 6,434 6,796 7,089 7,365 7,778 8,582 10,322 Annual Increase 6.6%5.6%4.3%3.9%2.3%1.9%1.9% Total Housing Units 42,345 44,445 46,145 47,746 50,145 54,811 64,838 Annual Increase 5.7%5.0%3.8%3.5%2.0%1.7%1.7% Persons per Hsg Unit 2.69 2.73 2.75 2.77 2.80 2.72 2.53 Jobs (by place of work) Industrial 7,501 7,693 7,890 8,092 8,511 9,656 12,430 Commercial 11,455 11,748 12,048 12,356 12,996 14,746 18,982 Institutional 4,133 4,238 4,347 4,458 4,689 5,320 6,848 Office & Other Services 17,486 17,933 18,392 18,862 19,839 22,509 28,976 Total Jobs 40,575 41,612 42,677 43,768 46,035 52,231 67,236 Annual Increase 2.6%2.6%2.6%2.6%2.6%2.6%2.6% Jobs to Housing Ratio 0.96 0.94 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 1.04 Nonresidential Floor Area (square feet in thousands) Industrial 9,070 9,300 9,540 9,780 10,290 11,670 15,030 Commercial 4,890 5,010 5,140 5,270 5,550 6,290 8,100 Institutional 4,450 4,560 4,680 4,800 5,040 5,720 7,370 Office & Other Services 5,890 6,040 6,190 6,350 6,680 7,580 9,760 Total KSF 24,300 24,910 25,550 26,200 27,560 31,260 40,260 Avg Sq Ft Per Job 599 599 599 599 599 598 599 Avg Jobs per KSF 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 570 of 576 27 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT “A development impact fee ordinance shall include a schedule of development impact fees for various land uses per unit of development. The ordinance shall provide that a developer shall have the right to elect to pay a project's proportionate share of system improvement costs by payment of development impact fees according to the fee schedule as full and complete payment of the development project's proportionate share of system improvement costs…” Even though formulas and methods are not specified in Idaho’s Development Impact Fee Act, DIFs must be reasonable and fair, as stated in section 67-8201(1). “All development impact fees shall be based on a reasonable and fair formula or method under which the development impact fee imposed does not exceed a proportionate share of the costs incurred, or to be incurred, by the governmental entity in the provision of system improvements to serve the new development. In the following sections, Raftelis describes reasonable and fair formulas and methods that can be used in the City of Meridian to make DIFs proportionate by size of residential development and type of nonresidential development. Residential Development and Persons per Housing Unit The 2010 census did not obtain detailed information using a “lo ng-form” questionnaire. Instead, the U.S. Census Bureau has switched to a continuous monthly mailing of surveys, known as the American Community Survey (ACS), which is limited by sample-size constraints. For example, data on detached housing units are now combined with attached single units (commonly known as townhouses). Part of the rationale for imposing fees by size threshold, as discussed further below, is to address this ACS data limitation. Because townhouses and apartments generally have fewer bedrooms and less floor area than detached units, size thresholds makes fees more proportionate and facilitates construction of affordable units. As shown Figure A2, dwellings with a single unit per structure (detached and attached) average 2.85 persons per housing unit. Dwellings in structures with two or more units average 2.00 year -round residents per unit. This category includes duplexes, which have two dwellings on a single land parcel. According to the latest available data, the overall average is 2.76 year-round residents per housing unit and 2.82 persons per household. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, a household is a housing unit that is occupied by year - round residents. Development fees often use per capita standards and persons per housing unit, or persons per household, to derive proportionate-share fee amounts. Raftelis recommends that fees for residential development in the City of Meridian be imposed according to the number of year -round residents per housing unit. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 571 of 576 28 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Figure A2:Year-Round Persons per Unit by Type of Housing Demand Indicators by Dwelling Size Impact fees must be proportionate to the demand for infrastructure. Because the average number of persons per housing unit has a strong, positive correlation to the number of bed rooms, Raftelis recommends residential fee schedules that increase by dwelling size.Custom tabulations of demographic data by bedroom range can be created from individual survey responses provided by the U.S. Census Bureau, in files known as Public Use Micro-Data Samples (PUMS). PUMS files are only available for areas of at least 100,000 persons, with the City of Meridian included in Public Use Micro -Data Area (PUMA) 701. As shown in Figure A3, Raftelis derived average persons per housing unit by bedroom range, from un-weighted PUMS data. The recommended multipliers by bedroom range (shown below) are for all types of housing units, adjusted to the control totals for Meridian. As shown above, the U.S. Census Bureau indicates that Meridian averages 2.76 persons per housing unit. Figure A3:Persons by Bedroom Range Meridian Population and Housing Characteristics Units in Structure Persons House-Persons per Housing Persons per Housing Vacancy holds Household Units Housing Unit Mix Rate Single Unit *81,202 27,793 2.92 28,448 2.85 89%2% All Other **6,765 3,379 2.00 3,378 2.00 11%0% Subtotal 87,967 31,172 2.82 31,826 2.76 2% Group Quarters 4,864 TOTAL 92,831 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2016 American Community Survey, 5-Year Estimates, Tables B25024, B25032, B25033, and B26001. *Single unit includes attached and detached. ** All other includes multifamily and mobile homes. Recommended Multipliers (2) Bedrooms Persons Housing Persons per Housing (1)Units (1)Housing Unit Mix 0-1 48 39 1.30 2.8% 2 353 194 1.92 14.1% 3 1,598 678 2.48 49.2% 4+1,614 467 3.64 33.9% Total 3,613 1,378 2.76 100.0% (1) American Community Survey, Public Use Microdata Sample for ID PUMA 701 (2012-2016 5-year database). (2) Recommended persons per housing unit are scaled to make the average derived from PUMS survey data match the control total for Meridian (i.e. 2.76 persons per housing unit). Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 572 of 576 29 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT DIFs based on size of dwelling are generally easier to administer when expressed in square feet of finished living space for all types of housing. Basing fees on floor area rather than the number of bedrooms eliminates the need for criteria to make administrative decisions on whether a room qualifies as a bedroom. To translate dwelling size by number of bedrooms into square feet of living space, Raftelis used the 2018 Ada County Assessor’s residential database to derive average square feet by bedroom range (i.e., two, three, and four or more bedrooms). Raftelis recommends that DIFs for residential development be imposed based on finished square feet of living space, excluding garages, patios and porches that are not climate-controlled. Average floor area and number of persons by bedroom range are plotted in Figure A4, with a logarithmic trend line derived from actual averages for Meridian. Using the trend line formula shown in the chart, Ra ftelis derived the estimated average number of persons, by dwelling size, in size thresholds like those currently used by the City of Boise. As shown with yellow highlighting, the lowest floor area range (1000 square feet or less) has an estimated average of 1.16 persons per housing unit. At the upper end of the floor area range (3201 or more square feet of climate-controlled space), the average is 3.63 persons per housing unit. For a building with more than one residential unit, City staff will determine the average size threshold for the entire building by dividing total climate-controlled floor area by the total number of dwellings in the building. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 573 of 576 30 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Figure A4:Persons by Square Feet of Living Space Jobs and Nonresidential Development In addition to data on residential development, the calculation of impact fees requires data on nonresidential development.Raftelis uses the term “jobs” to refer to employment by place of work.In Figure A5, color shading indicates nonresidential development prototypes the will be used by Raftelis to derive average weekday vehicle trips and nonresidential floor area. For future industrial development, Raftelis averaged Light Industrial (ITE code 110) and Warehousing (ITE 150) to derive an average of 1,209 square feet p er industrial job. The prototype for future commercial development is an average -size Shopping Center (ITE code 820). Commercial development (i.e., retail and eating/drinking places) is assumed to average 427 square feet per job. For institutional devel opment, such as schools, daycare and churches, the impact fee study assumes an average of 1,076 square feet per job. The prototype for institutional development is an Elementary School (ITE 520). For office and other services, an average -size Office (ITE 710) is the prototype for future development, averaging of 337 square feet per job. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 574 of 576 31 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Figure A5:Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends Figure A6 indicates 2015 estimates of jobs and nonresidential floor area within Meridian. Job estimates, by type of nonresidential, are from Meridian’s Work Area Profile, available through the U.S. Census Bureau’s online web application known as OnTheMap. The number of jobs in Meridian is based on quarterly workforce reports supplied by employers. Floor area estimates are derived from the number of jobs by type of nonresidential development and average square feet per job ratios, as discussed on the previous page. Total floor area of nonresidential development in Meridian is consistent with property tax parcel informa tion obtained from Ada County. ITE Land Use / Size Demand Wkdy Trip Ends Wkdy Trip Ends Emp Per Sq Ft Code Unit Per Dmd Unit*Per Employee*Dmd Unit Per Emp 110 Light Industrial 1,000 Sq Ft 4.96 3.05 1.63 615 140 Manufacturing 1,000 Sq Ft 3.93 2.47 1.59 628 150 Warehousing 1,000 Sq Ft 1.74 5.05 0.34 2,902 520 Elementary School 1,000 Sq Ft 19.52 21.00 0.93 1,076 530 High School 1,000 Sq Ft 14.07 22.25 0.63 1,581 610 Hospital 1,000 Sq Ft 10.72 3.79 2.83 354 620 Nursing Home 1,000 Sq Ft 6.64 2.91 2.28 438 710 General Office 1,000 Sq Ft 9.74 3.28 2.97 337 760 Research & Dev Center 1,000 Sq Ft 11.26 3.29 3.42 292 770 Business Park 1,000 Sq Ft 12.44 4.04 3.08 325 820 Shopping Center (avg size)1,000 Sq Ft 37.75 16.11 2.34 427 857 Discount Club 1,000 Sq Ft 41.80 32.21 1.30 771 Industrial in Meridian 1,000 Sq Ft 3.35 4.05 0.83 1,209 *Trip Generation , Institute of Transportation Engineers, 10th Edition (2017). Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 575 of 576 32 2019 MERIDIAN DEVELO PMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Figure A6:Jobs and Floor Area Estimates Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 21, 2019 – Page 576 of 576 CDAHOIDIAN*,---- �IwlIZ, CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 21, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 14 Project File Name/Number: Item Title: Future Meeting Topics Meeting Notes: