2019-04-18 Meridian Police DepartmentDATE: 4/18/2019
TO: Sonya Allen
REVIEWER: Lieutenant Scott Colaianni
SUBJECT: H-2019-0027
PROJECT NAME: Delano Sub
POLICE DEPARTMENT SUMMARY OF REPORT:
1. Police Response Time -The Delano Sub proposed development is approximately 5.0 miles from the
Meridian Police Department. The expected response time to this area in an emergency is approximately
4:30 minutes. The Meridian Police Department responded to just over 577 calls for service in the one -
mile area surrounding the proposed development between 3/1/18 and 2/28/19. (See documents for
additional information)
2. Accessibility — The Meridian Police Department has no issues with access to the proposed site.
3. Resource needs — No additional resources are needed. The Meridian Police Department already
services this area.
4. Other comments- - The applicant shall make every attempt to mitigate sound, odor, light trespass and
litter from encroachment upon the surrounding neighborhoods. This would include following all UDC's
requirements in light shielding, noise containment and location of trash containers.
In addition, the Meridian Police Department would like to see pathway/sidewalks that connect to the
surrounding neighborhoods, restaurants and retail in the surrounding area if feasible.
The Meridian Police Department would ask the applicant to complete all roadway/intersection
improvements, sidewalks, pathways etc. as outlined by ITD and ACHD in any traffic studies or
agreements for this proposed developments.
Finally, the Meridian Police Department would ask that there be no reduction of parking spaces as
outlined in Exhibit J Parking Plan.
Meridian Police Department - Delano Sub
Location of new development - 14120 W Jamine Lane & 2800 E Jasmine Lane
Time Frame - 03/1/2018-02/28/2019
Level of Service (LoS)- Delivered By Reporting District (RD - M724)
Calls for Service (CFS): Response Times: Dispatch to Arrival
(all units)
Average Response Times by Priority: 'City of Meridian'
Priority 3
4.01
Priority 2
7.13
Priority 1
10.42
Average Response Times by Priority:_'M724'
Priority 3
4.38
Priority 2
7.07
Priority 1
10.02
Calls for Service (CFS): Calls occurring in RD'M724'
CFS Count Total
577
% of Calls for Service split by Priority in 'M724'
• of P3 CFS
1.4%
• of P2 CFS
62.7%
• of P1 CFS
32.6%
• of PO CFS
3.3%
Crimes
Crime Count Total
151
Crashes
*Crash Count:Tota]
38
Analyst Note (s):
Response Time and Calls for Service (CFS) by Priority - Most frequent priority call types;
• Priority 3 calls most frequently involve injury crashes.
• Priority 2 calls most frequently involve Traffic Stop, Suspicious Vehicle, and Welfare Check.
• Priority 1 calls most frequently involve Follow-up, Vehicle Burglary, and Citizen Assist .
Crime - Most frequent crimes involved;
• All Other Offenses (Violation of Protection Order, Leaving the Scene of an Accident, and Failure to Appear),
• Shoplifting, and
• Drug / Narcotic Violations.
*Crashes - Most frequent crashes were;
• 50.0% Injury type crashes.
• 39.5% involved non -reportable type crashes, and
• 10.5% were property damage reports.
Priority Response Times Defined:
Priority 0 type calls are no priority type of calls.
Priority 1 type calls are for non -emergency type of calls where the officer will arrive at the earliest convenience, and
Priority 2 type calls require an urgent response where the officer will arrive as soon as practical, and should obey all
traffic laws.
Priority 3 type calls are an emergency response in which the lights and siren and driving as authorized for an
emergency vehicle by Idaho Code to facilitate the quick and safe arrival of an officer to the scene.
*Some data may be incomplete due to report processing times.
4/18/2019
BME3236 Source: TT CAD, NWRMS, WebCars