MDA-13-007 MEDINA SUBDIVISIONPlanning Division
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT MODIFICATION
Application Checklist
?rlrft IAN
All applications are required to contain q!!9. copy of the following: L
APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ALL APPUCABLE ITEMS ON THE CHECKLIST ARE
SUBMITTED. THIS APPUCATION SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE (NOR WILL A PUBLIC
HEARING BE SET) UNTIL STAFF HAS RECEIVED ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION.
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102 o Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 o Facsimile:
(208) 888-6854 o Website: www.meridiancity.org
(02/082013)
ilrr*1ry
Projectname: Y\ali,un Su$O-rviSior,l File#: MDA-13<
Applicant
(i) Description
Staff
({)
x. Completed & signed Commission & Council Review Application i,/
d.
Narrative fully describing the proposed request, including but not limited to the following:
,/
)( Affidavit of Legal Interest signed & notarized by the property owner (tf owner is
a corporation,
submit a copy of the Articles of hcorporation or other evidence to show that the person signing is an authorized agent.) /
x Pre-Scaled application vicinity map meeting showing notes the (All location applications of that the require subject a public property hearing are required to conduct a pre- t./
application meeting with the Planning Department.) ,s
x Neighborhood meeting sign-in sheet lApplicants are required to hold a neighborhood meering to provide
an opportunity for public review qf
the proposed project prior to the submittal of an application.)
Y Commitment of Property Posting form signed by the applicant/agent
x x Fee Parcel verification letter from Development Services (887-2211) t/
IDAHO
,A crnrrlr
//a laa Dtsrx.tct
K :fTHEALTH- oEPARTMENI
CENTRAL DISTRICT H EALTH DEPARTMENT
Environmental Health Division
Return to:
tr Acz
E Boise
E Eagle
E Garden City
E Kuna
'r p lileridian
E star
Rezone #
Preliminary I Final lShort Plat H.OA \R- oo4 $41i".,,- (...r,-,\.i
u r.r,''
We have No Objections to this Proposal,
We recommend Denial of this Proposal.
Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal.
We will require more data concerning soil conditions on thls Proposal before we can comment.
Before we E Echaracteristics can high bedrock comment seasonalground from concerning original water grade individual sewage E E disposal, waste other flow we will require more data concerning
the depth of:
E O. tnis otfice may require a study to assess the impact ol nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground walers
and
surface waters.
tr Z. This prolect shall be reviewed by the ldaho Department of Water Hesources concerning well construction and
water availability.
trr
trz
Ds
E+
Ds
f,
Y
After written p centralsewage approval from appropriate D entities community are sewage submitted, system we can approve D community this proposal water for: well
E interim sewage rycentral water
E individual sewage E individualwater
o The following plan(s) must
be submitted to and approved by the ldaho Department of Environmental ouality:
E central sewage D community sewage system O community water
tr sewage dry lines F centralwater
This Department would recommend defenal until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other
considerations indicate approval.
lf restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet ldaho State
Sewage Regulations.
trro
D 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any:
D Espas food beverage establishment establishment E tr grocery swimming store pools or
Err
drs
E child care center
lnfiltration beds for storm water disposal are considered shallow injection wells. An application and fee must be
I 2..
15726.001EU1111
trtq
submitted to CDHD
Reviewed By:
Date
Review Sheet
Conditional Use #
Item #6G; Medina Subdivision (MDA-,l3-007)
Application(s):
) DevelopmentAgreement Modification
Size of property, existing zoning, and location: The site consists of 7.66 acres of land in the C-G zoning district and is
located at the SWC of Overland & Meridian.
Summary of Request: The rEuest is to amend the existing DA, which cunently requires all future uses on each lot to obtain
(detailed) CUP approval. The applicant's request is to remove the CUP requirement and add language stating all future uses
that conform to the C-G zone would be approved & that any future uses with dnve{hru windows within 300' of a residential
building require a CUP.
The applicant states the reason for the request is because the property is bordered on three sides by commercial uses.
Additionally, requinng a CUP for each new use that is in conformance with the C-G district is time consuming, costly, and
burdens staff with additional work.
At the tjme this DA was approved in 2005, the City did not have design standards; this prolect pre-dates the UDC. Therefore,
CUP approval was required to ensure quality of design of the site & structures. Because the City now has design standards
that are applicable to fulure development of this site, there is no need for detailed CUP review & approval except for when
such is required by the UDCfor the use. A dnve{hru establishment proposed within 300 feet of another drive{hru facility, an
existing residence or a residential district is required to obtain CUP approvali Because the cunent UDC provisions cover the
intent of the DA for this property, staff recommends this provision be stricken in its entrrety; or,
if Council desires to retain the
CUP language, Staff recommends changes that are consistent with UDC requirements (see Exhibit A.2).
Outstanding lssue(s) for City Council: None
Staff Recommendation : Approval
Written Testimony: Jeff Huber (in agreement w/staff report)
Notes: