CPAM-12-001 AZ-12-005 PP-12-003 TM CROSSINGPlanning Department
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Application Checklist
IAN
All applications are required to contain one copy of the following:
Note: Only one copy of the above items need be submitted when submitting multiple applications.
THIS APPLICATION SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE UNTIL STAFF HAS RECEIVED ALL
REQUIRED INFORMATION.
PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATIONS MUST BE COMPLETE AS oF JUNE 15M AND
DECEMBER I5TH.
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 210 o Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 o Facsimile: (208)
888-6854 o websire: www.meridiancity.org
(Rev. I 1/4/08)
v-,6J l
ect name Auzt Hb 6. OP*m-
Applicant
t"ll ,z
Requirements for Text & Map Amendments
Staff
({)
,/ and Commission & Council Review
Narrative fully describing the proposed request
growth and development of the city
D Any other data and information that would support this request
Pre-application meeting notes (All applications that require a public hearing are required to
conduct a pre-
with the o
Fee
Additional Requirements for Map Amendments
Include the following additional information in the narrative:
intentions for land involved
/ Neighborhood meeting sign-in sheet (Applicants are required to hold a neighborhood meeting to provide
an opportunity for public review of the proposed project prior to the submittal of an application.)
/thet Recorded Affidavit of Legal Interest deed for signed & notarized by the property ownef (lf
owner is a corporation,
submit a copy of the Articles of or other evidence to show that the person signing is an
authorized agent.)
Commitment of form b the
Scaled vicini the location of the
Additional Requirements for Text Amendments
Include > the Underline following and additional strikeout information changes for in text the amendments narrative: c tDt
sub.lect property
Planning Department
ov{Checklisr, IDIAN PRELIMINARY PLAT r Application
name: P-tz-Oo3
All applications are required to contain one copy of the following:
Note: Only one copy of the above items need be submitted when submitting multiple applications
Additional Requirements for Preliminary Plat Applications
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 210 r Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 . Facsimile:
(208) 888-6854 o Websire: www.meridiancity.org
(Rev. 6/02201 I )
Applicant
({) .
Description Staff
({)
& Commission & Council Review
t/ Narrative fully describing the proposed project c6NdZ t4-M2
Legal description the subject property (Lot, Block, and Subdivision name if located in a recorded
OR a metes and bounds of the if not in a
Recorded warranty deed for the sub.iect property
lr/
Affidavit ofLegal Interest signed & notarized by the property owner (If owner
is a corporarion,
submit a copy of the Articles of or other evidence to show that the person signing is an authorized agent.)
Scaled vici the location of the
Pre-application meeti ng notes applications thar require a public hearing are requ ired to conduct a
pre-
with the
Neighborhood meetlng ign-in sheet (Applicants required to hold a neighborhood meeting to provide
an for revrew of the to the submittal of
Commitment of form the
Fee (Please call Planning Department to calculate correct fee.
Applications with
incorrect fees will not be
)
Applicant
({) Description
Staff
({)
Include the following additional information inthe
a varianceudlbe
proJect narrative:
Address 'hether or not requested with respect to any provision of
the ordinance describing the particular
reason thereof
provision, the vanance requested, and the
Development features and/or commitments by the applicant
Description of any covenant or deed restrictions that support the proposed
rear setback to buffer
Approval of the proposed subdivision name from the Ada County Surveyor's office
/ Preliminary Plat
-*
I copy (folded ro 8 Vz" x I l" size)
The items must be included on the
a subdivision name not use numbers in
names
a date
o Section location and county (situatg statement)
a North arrow L/'
a Name, address and phone number of owner(s), applicant, and engineer, surveyor or
who the
a Streets, street names, rights-of-way and roadway widths, including adjoining streets
or road details on
Proposed
of each
and existing lot lines and blocks showing scaled dimensions and numbers
a of
\ a a Contour Minimum lines residential shown at house 5' intervals size where R-2 and land R-slope 4 zones is greater than l|Vo and at2' ^/A
intervals where land slope is ljvo or less, referenced to an established benchmark,
location and elevation
/
a Any proposed or existing utilities including, but not Iimited to, storm and sanitary
sewers, inigation laterals, ditches, drainage, bridges, culverts, water mains, fire
hydrants, pressurized irrigation and their respegtive profiles.
I o Any dedications to the public and easements together with a statement of location,
.such Master dimensions street and drainage plan, of including method of disposal
I
as determined FEMA or measures to amend this
a stub streets to provide access to adjacent undeveloped land or existing roadways
a Block faces not more than seven hundred fifty feet (750') in length without an
street or
a Block lengths not greater than thirteen hundred feet (1,300') without a
pedestrian
COnnection (residenrial disrricrs
a Cul-de-sac lengths not in excess of450'
Reduction of the preliminary plat (8 72" x 11")
/
Landscape plan - *l
copy (folded toSVz" x I l" size)
Planmust have a scale no smallerthan I" = 50'(l"
= 20'is preferred) andbe ona standarddrawing
sheet, not to exceed 36" x 48" (24" x 36" is preferred). A planwhich cannot
be drawn in its entirety
on a single sheet must be drawn with appropriate match lines on two or more sheets.
The following items must be included on the landscape plan:
a Date, north arrow, and project name
a Names, addresses, and telephone numbers ofthe developer and the person and/or
firm preparing the plan
a Existing natural features such as canals, creeks, drains, ponds, wetlands,
floodplains, high groundryater areas, and rock outcroppings
a Location, size, and species of all existing trees on site with trunks 4 inches or
greater in diameter, measured 6 inches above the ground. Indicate whether the tree
will be retained or removed.
I
a A statement of how existing healthy trees proposed to be retained will be protected
I Existing from buildings, structures. construction planting areas, light poles, power poles, walls,
fences, berms, parking and loading areas, vehicular drives, trash areas, sidewalks,
pathways, stormwater detention areas, signs, street furniture, and other man-made
elements.
\
a Existing and proposed contours for all areas steeper Lhan20Vo slope, Berms shall
\ a be Sight showir 'Iriangles with one-foot contours.
as defined in I I -3A-5 of this ordinance.
a Propqqed landscaping
o Proposed screening structures
Calculations of project components to demonstrate compliance with the
requirements of this ordinance, including:
) )trees ) > Acreage Number Width Residential of of dedicated street trees subdivision buffers, provided for common lineal trees on common feet open of street space lot(s) frontage,
and number of street
a
( far only)
V
Supplementary information at the discretion of the Director or City Engineer may be required to sufficiently detail
the proposed development within any special development area, including but not limited to hillside, planned unit
development, Jloodplain, cemetery, manufactured home
parks, and/or hazardous or unique areas of development.
*Once an application is accepted, staffwill contact you to let you know how
many additional copies of plans are
required. All plans are required to be fuklgdto 8 /2" x I l
" size.
APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ALL APPLICABLE ITEMS ON THE CHECKLIST ARE
SUBMITTED. THIS APPUCATION SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE (NOR WILL A PUBLIC
HEARING BE SET) UNTIL STAFF HAS RECEIVED ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION.
Il.,J-,'/ /I* Reduction ) of Mitigation the landscape for removal plan (8 Yz" of existing x 1 1") trees
Site report of the highest seasonal groundwater elevation prepared by a registered soils
scientist
ft?.Ia/.{/,
palYa4 'Mt+o
Written confirmation that a traffic impact study is not required and/or has been submitted
, review to ACHD. Please contact Mindy Wallace at 387-6178 or
Jfor more information.
Submit two (2) sets of conceptual at 387 -6144 tr,
Works for approval (zos-ags-ssoo).
engineering plans, including respective profiles to Public
r/ Conceptual elevations of proposed sqlrctures, including building materials
Disk with electronic version of the conceptual engineering plans in a format
that complies with the Specifications for Project Drawings found at:
http://www.meridiancity.org/public works/autocad stanclards/index.asp
Electronic version of the preliminary plat & landscape plan in pdf format submitted on a disk
with the files named with project name & plan type (i.e. preliminary plat, landscape plan,
etc.). We encourage you to also submit at least one color version for presentation purposes.
clr{rry Planning Department
ANNEXATION/REZONE I Application Checklist
Application is required to contain one copy of the following:
Note: Only one copy of the above items need be submitted when submitting nultiple applications
Additional Requirements for Annexation/Rezone Applications:
APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ALLAPPLICABLE ITEMS ON THE CHECKLIST ARE
SUBMITTED.
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 210 r Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 o Facsimile:
(208) 888-6854 o Website: www.meridiancity.org
(Rev. I l/4/08)
#'A.z-LL'otfi
appticantaeent:bll I C 12+E\kugut*1+ Olzgto L^a tlltot+m- D. /tt4obti
Applicant
(i) Description
Staff
({)
& Commission & Council Review
Narrative fully describing the ploposed project
Legal description of the property to be annexed and/or rezoned
a
a
a
Include a metes & bounds description to the section line of all adjacent roadways, stamped & signed by a
registered professional land surveyor, with a calculated closure sheet.
Scaled exhibit map showing the boundaries of the legal description in compliance W the requirements of the
Idaho State Tax Commission Property Tax Administrative Rules IDApA 35.01.03.225.01.h.
If requesting more than one mning designation, include a legal description for each zone along with an overall
annexatior/rezone boundary description. Also include the boundaries of each different zone on the map.
*Note: When also submitting a Preliminary Pbt application, a separate legal description is
required for the
boundaries of the plat, excluding property to the section line as required fitr
annexations/rezones.
Recorded warranty deed for the surbject property
Affidavit of Legal Interest signed & notarized by the property owner (tf
owner is a corporarion,
submit a copy of the Articles of Incolporation or other evidence to show that the person signing is an authorized aeent.)
Scaled vicinity showing the location ofthe subiect property
Provide (Roads, access of and
,/ Pre-application meeting notes (All apptications
application meeting with the Planning Department.)
that require a public hearing are required to conduct a pre-
,/ Neighborhood meeting sign-in sheet (Applicants are required to hold a neighborhood meeting to provide
an opponunity for public review of the propgsed project prior to the submittal of an
application.)
Commitment of Property Posting form signed by the applicanUagent
Fee (Please call Planning Department to calculate correct fee.
Applications with
incorrect fees will not be )
Applicant
r{l
Description
Staff
({)
xr/* If this application is not accompanied by a plat, conditional use permit, or planned unit
development application, submit a conceptual development plan and elevations for the
property (also submit an electronic version of the plan(s) in pdf fbrmat on a disk with the file named
with project narng & plan type [i.e. conceptual development plan,
elevations]).
Project name, TEN lh Ure CPa-r&(r
t--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
rI-I --
I
T-
ll
((
)
L__
I
J I
i
---f
I
I
--a
t----------------
l
I
)
li
Ir
i
I
L__
t
ta_ II3
t I t 3 t
t at t
tt t
I 3 J' ,
o a I
t
,
t ,
t
I3
a
t, r
,E3E3a 3 r
3t
,
!
E
L_____
I
I
-) I
r--------
I
j- I
^a) lrl \
lo lo
6o
a{
3
o
(-)
Iott
9.
gq
ts
&lghurn Corporathn
Tan iiile Crosseq
PmpeedConmplHesona SIH Han AnnexEllln and
--{
(D
o
-a )
oo
2.
oa
N)
1
J
I
"'
isr
t !
r t
o {
:,
=6-
r] a
o
tn
9.
gq
€-_TEN MILE ROAD*-
It
JI
I
t t
)
n
t
Ii i'.
I
I
,t
l{
tf
lf
tf
(r
I
I
I
I
il
I
I
,I
r$
$*
rtI
!
tt
rl
I
I
flJ*4rry{
$E
<A ,F
iiit civiF
IF
$lE
J --:.---1 *-'.
It
I
a
qIot 5
I
It
T
5
I
I
t
ei*rbn @raton
m {
o
r)
tn
v\.
:,
0a
ll
It
Propoaed Corrept Slls Han
Ten lrile C.orslry
Annsxa{on and Rerofia
* &lghtonCoryora0m
il
H il
A
SE
$ -'&
$
tt ll
.I '
I
,
r r
;s,
t
'f
Eastern
Boundary
Buffer
)
48'
6
)
3
ScrH grrubs
sdtd 6'
Eath 8m
5'
Siderdt Sfl6
Buffer
&flr
East Residential
Scda \y'tr - I'
Ten Mile Crossing 5
I
I
n
a
a a
I
I
I
I
I
t
)
't
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lal
a
a
T
L
1
L
062
o
o -CT
o =
I
I
Linder Road
I
t,
t
I
I
| ,r
f,
F
ITT
ff Ir
I
E
-€ra
E
@6mtr 13 19,
a
#"
ut liil
l; I trt
::^ .
lillllll -
r!fllll :
. --'.4
ry ;*
l.
,f,I
m-r'
' :11
H
-f
J1. r:
.t
LL I
NI{
\-
T?
,
d!
rI ...
!
l
Ll
* )
l}'.'r
I
\IF
l*
i rr \
I
I
rl
5
I: B t t I
f,
I
\
t-. -.1
a
-.rd L
a
L
ffi iI
h
\ -..1
2
t t,
EE
I
I t,"-\
{
ut
.il
I
l
I
I
:t
I
* ,E;
-l-.*k I rt
J+
i,:.
(
,, l
il
t'!
I a l
',{ P
I
t
!
-o {
o
r')
to
9.
oa
.a t
!
Ia
E6
oE
o
c
.g
E
o€ ED
o
FF
?Oo n
dE
€s
-l!
.FC E5
E
E actr
o
6
o.
oE
o
8cIl
6-
II
I
I
,
I
I
t
I
,
,
I
T
)
)
Ten Mile Crossing 8
I
(
T
;
I
I
I
_.r
I
1
Item #8C & D: Olson & Bush (CPAM-'|2.003; A2.12.003)
Application(s):
) F Annexatron Comprehensive & Zoning Plan Map Amendment
Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 6.84 acres, is cunently zoned RUT in Ada County, and is
located at 2950 E. Franklin Road,
Summary of Request: The applicant requests an amendment to the comprehensive plan FLUM to change the land use designation
on 5.66 +l acres of land from Commercial to lndustrial. Concunently, the applicant requests annexation & zoning of
'1.41 acres of land
to the C-G zoning distnct & 5.78 acres to the l-L zoning district, mnsistent with the existing & proposed FLUM designations of
Commercial & lndustial for the site.
The applicant plans to re-plat the portion of olson & Bush Subdivision No. 2 that lies to the north of this site to include the subject
property creating longer light industrial lots that front on Lanark Street as shown on the concept plan. The portion
ofthe site that fronts
on Franklin Road is proposed to be Commercial (see Exhibit A.2).
There is an existing home on the property proposed to be zoned C-G that is proposed
to remain as such untjl the property redevelops
e pli
fail
Commission Recommendation: Approval
Summary i. ln favor: of Commission Ron Van Auker Public Jr, Hearing:
ii. ln opposition: None
Commenting: None
Written testimony: Brad Miller (response to the staff report) -
Reguesrs tiaf the existing home be allowed to continue using thp
t
well & sewer until such time as eithet the well or septic fails, or residentid use of the propely is discontinued & the property-
redevelops.
Key i. lssue(The s) timing of Discussion for the existing by Commission:home to hook-up to City water & sewer service.
Key i. Commission The Commission Change(recommended s) to Staff Recommendation:the existing home nol be required to hook-up to City water & sewer service until such time as
the property redevelops or the system(s) fails (see Exhibit B, #1 .1.1a).
Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: None
Outstanding lssue(s) for City Council: The timing for the existing home to hook-up to City water & sewer service
Notes: Sra./ rni/ler
( 2/>r_r>\1
r/or' 14 p"l flz
' ltem #8H, l, & J: TM Crossing (CPAM.I2-001 ;
A2.12-001 PP.12.003)
Ann{cation(s):
tfl'dt comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
rr D. ReZOne <<.t,tt tt tp{ -ru nll ,t-r.y't t"
, > Preliminary PIat
Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 75.5 acres, is cunenuy zoned RUT in Ada County, and is
located on the northeast comer of 184 & S. Ten Mile Road.
Summary of Request & Sfaffs Analysis:
. The applicant requests an amendment to the FLUM contained in the TMISAP to change the land use designation on a total of
75.5 acres of land from Lifestyle Center (30.45+l acres); lVedium High Density Residentral (8.5+l acres); and High Density
Employment (39.75 acres) to Commercial.
Because 176 acres of Mixed Enploqent uses are planned to the south of l-84 & 76
acres of High Density Enployment uses
are planned to the west of Ten Mile Rd; and a lifestyle center is under construction at Fairuiew & Eagle, the Comm,ssion ,b of
the opinion a Commercial designation may be appropide for kis propedy as long as lhe propefty
develops in accord with the
design elements of the TMISAP.
o Annexation and zoning of 89.22 acres of land with he C-G district is proposed consistent with the proposed
FLUM
designation of Commercial. A conceptual development plan was submitted that depicts future building locations, parking,
streets, and drive aisles. Sample building elevations were also submitted.
Because the Zoning Compatibility Matix in the TMISAP lists the C-G distict as a zoning choice for the existing LC & HDE
designated areas as well as he proposed Commercial designation, he Connission recommends approval of the requested
zoning.
Hours of operation for bus,nesses ,n the C-G distrbt that are adjacent to residential uses are limited from 6 am to 11 pm. This
will apply to businesses along the east boundary of the site adiacent to Pimrcse Subdivision.
As a provision of annexation, staff is recommending a DA wth the provisions listed in Exhibit B of the staff report.
. A preliminary plat consisting of 50 commercial building lots & 4 common/other lots was also submitted. The preliminary plat is
proposed to develop in 2 phases.
,Access r.s proposed via an off-site rccess to Ten Mile Road nofth of the site; no other access is available to the siie at thrb
time. ACHD policy resticts the amount of traffic allowed at a collector street with only one public str*f access rn & out of the
site to 3,000 vehicle tips per day. Addiilonally, the Fire Dept requies conmercial buildings or facilities having a gross
building area of more than 62,000 s.f. to be provided with 2 separate & approved fire apparatus roads. Therefore,
development will be limited until a secondary access can be provided.
The trarcponaion:ystea aapcontained in the TMISAP depicts an oi7-srte access fo Ten Mile (nofh of the site) which runs
south to a round-+bout at lhe noih boundary of the site. From there, a col/ector slreel rb shown along the nolh boundary of
lfie srfe to fhe easi & also to the south and back to the west under he Ten Mile ranp. From the roundabout, the strcet section
shows 2-lane streets as appropriate for this ste
The applicant a roundabout at the nofth boundary of the site wfth +lane streets & a nedian tum lane throughout the
site except for the leg hat runs to the west under the Ten Mile ramp, which is a 2-lane street consistenl wdh lhe street
section map. While the 4-lane a median tum lane is an option for a street layout in he Ten Mile are4 a sfreet of this slze is
meant to seve as an afteial w/access resticted to collectors. Because of the high volume of trafiic that is likely to be
genercted frcm the proposed development, the Commission is of the opinion the proposed streets are appropriate.
The Purdam Drain cunently bisects this s,te from the SEC to the NWC. The Taylor Drain connects to the Purdan Drain trom
the south. The Purdam Drain is proposed to be relocated along the southem &westem boundary of the site. Boh of these
exrsfrilg easements arc ptoposed to be vacated.
Landscape street buffers and buffers to residential uses area proposed on he landscape plan in aeord W/UDC standads.
Commission Recommendation: Approval at the August '16h
public hearing
Summary i. In favor: of Commission Mike Wardle Public Hearing:
ii. ln opposition: None
iii. Commenting: None
iv. Wntten testimony: Mike Wardle (response to the staff report)
Key i. lssue(lVodifying s) of Discussion the FLUM to by allow Commission:for commercial rather than mixed-use development in this area.
Key Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: (At the rccommendation of sbn
i. Modify DA provision #1,1.2a to require a revised concept plan, consistent with the design elements of the Ten Mile plan,
to be
submitted prior to submittal of the first Certilicate of Zoning Compliance;
ii. Add a DA provision requiring all street names within the development to be approved by the street name committee or the
Planning Commission as applicable, prior to final plat approval (see
Exhibit B, #1 ,1.2j);
iii. Add a DA provision requinng a roundabout at the north property boundary (see
Exhibit B, #1 .'1.2k).
Outstanding lssue(slfor City Council: J
Writte
requests screening of roof-top mechanical equipment, loading docks, refuse & storage areas; and a heightened level of
architectural emphasis on the rear walls of the buildings facing his property. This wll be taken care of wDesign Review.
It/ike Wardle - Requests DA provision #1,1,2e be modified as follows: "AWelcome to Meridian slgn shall be constructed€l+h€
northofthel-84off+amptoTenMileRoad.ThedeveloperShall
coordinate the_[u!di!g, design and location of the sign with City Planning staff and rties
alono Ten Mile Road, north to Frankiin Road." *S1"{'
the following language
t .a(r
oy n2
mends : "Prior to issuance of the firct Certifcate of
Occupancy within the site, the loper shall submit a surety to the City of l/eridian for half ('112) the cost of a Welcome to
Mend,an sign to be placed interseclion of S. Ten Mile Road & S. Smithlield Dnve on the property
to.the north. The
developer shall coordi
Th
Pa
(5)
sig
e intent bein the property owner to the north to pay for the remaining portion
of the srgn at the time of development of
rcel#S'1 and construct the sign at that tjme. lf the referenced property to the north does not develop within five
e surety shall be retumed to the developer and the developer shall have no further obligatron pertaining to the
n."
Notes: L'nJ rurnbu/l a/ ) lio Dao'i5
ln lieu of the applicant's request,
the design and location of the sign with City Planning staff.
d
Item r,4l, J, K: TM Crossing (CPAM-12-001; AZ-12-005; PP-i2.003)
Application(s):
> >Zoning > Amendment Annexation Preliminary & Plat to the Future Land Use lVlap contained in the Comprehensive Plan
Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 75.5 acres, is cunently zoned RUT in Ada
County, and is located on the NEC of l-84 & Ten [/ile.
Adjacent Land Use & Zoning:
North: Agncultural land, zoned RUT in Ada County
South: l-84 and vacant land, zoned M-E
Easl: Rural residential properties in Primrose Subdivision, zoned R1 in Ada County
West: Ten lVlile Road & vacant property, zoned C-C & H-E
Summary of Request & Sfaffs Aralysis:
. The applicant requests an amendment to the FLUM contained in lhe Comp Plan to change the land use
designation on a total of 75.5 acres of land from Lifestyle Center (30.45+l acres); [redium High Density
Residential (8.5+l acres); and High Density Employment (39.75 acres) to Commercial. Because 176 acres
of Mixed Employment uses are planned to the south of l-84 &76 acres of High Density Employment uses
are planned to the west of Ten Mile; and a lifestyle center is under construction at Fairview E Eagle, Staffrb
of the opinion a Commercial designation may be appropriate for this properly if the propely
is developed in
accord with the design elements in the TMISAP. These elements focus on the quatty of the built
environment & include recommendations on the location & design of building frontages & limits on buitding
heights. Pedestrian oiented design is key in this area.
. Annexation and zoning 0f89.22 acres of land to the C-G district is proposed consistent with the proposed
FLUIVI designatlon of Commerctal. A conceptual development plan was submitted that depicts future
building locations, parking, streets, and dnve aisles. Sample building elevatjons were also submitted,
Because the Zoning Compatibil$ Matix in ke TMISAP lists the C-G district as a zoning choice fot the
existing LC & HDE designated areas & CG is also appropriate for the proposed Commercial designation,
staff is suppottive of the requested zoning. Also, the C-G distict allows for the types of uses allowed under
the former & proposed land use designations.
o A preliminary plat consisting of 50 commercial building lots & 4 common/other lots on 75.5 acres of land was
also submitted. The preliminary plat is proposed to develop in 2 phases. Although an
abundance of lots are
proposed, staff recognizes this ls because future us eNowners are unknown making the ultimate size &
configuration of lots inpossible to know at this time. The proposed plat will allow for a future reduction in
lots or prcpedy boundary adjustments as needed.
Access to this sde ,s proposed via an off-srte access to Ten Mile Road nolh of the srte; no ofher access ,,s
available to the site at this time. ACHD policy restricts the amount of traffic allowed on a collector street with
only one public streef access in & oul of the site to 3,000 vehicle tips per day. Additionally, the Fire Dept
requires commercial buildings or facilities having a gross building area of more than 62,000 s.f. to be
provided with 2 separate & approved fire apparatus roads. Therefore, development will limited until a
secondary access can be provided.
The transpodation systen map contained in ke TMISAP depicls a, off-s,te access to Ten Mile (nofth of the
site) which runs south to a round-a-bout at the nofh boundary of the site. From there, a collector street is
shown along the nofth boundary of the slre to the east & a/so to the south and bx,k to the west under the
Ten Mile ramp. From the round-a-about, the street section map shows 2-lane streets as appropriate for this
s,le.
The applicant proposes 4lane streets with a median tum lane thrcughout the site except for the leg that
runs to the west under the Ten Mile ranp, which is a 2-lane street, consistent with the street section map.
While the 4Jane a median tum lane is an option for a street layout in the Ten Mile area, a street oi fh,b
size is meant to serue as an afterial access restrrcfed fo col/ectors. Because of the high volume of trafflc
that is likely to be generuted from the proposed development, staff is of the opinion the proposed
streets
are appropiate.
The applicant has revised the concept plan submitted with tlte application to depict a round-a-bout at the
nodh boundary consistent the transpoftation system map.
The Purdam Drain currently bisects this properly from the SEC to the NWC. The Taylor Drain connects to
the Purdam Drain from the south. The Purdam Drain is proposed to be relocated along the southem
boundary of the site. Both ol these existing easements are proposed to be vacated.
Landscape strcet buffers and buffers to restdential uses area proposed on tte landscape plan in accord
UDC standards.
Hours of operation for businesses in the C-G district that are adlacent to residential uses are limited from 6 am to 11
pm. This will apply to businesses along the east boundary of the site adjacent to Primrose Subdivision.
A Welcome to Meidian monument sign is designated on this property visible from the l-84 off-ramp to Ten Mile
Road. Staff is recommending a DA provision that the developer construct a sign accordingly & coordinate with staff
on the locatron/design.
As a provision of annexation, staff is recommending a development agreement with the provisions
listed in Exhibrt B
of the staff report. Additionally, staff recommends the following provisions be added:
o Modify #1.'1.2a to read, "Pnor to submittal of the first Certrficate of Zoning Compliance for this site, the
development agreement shall be modi{ied to include a revised concept plan that is consistent with the
design elements of the Ten Mile lnterchange Specific Area Plan."
. All street names within the subdivision shall be approved by the Street Name Committee (or Planning
Commission, as applicable) pnor to flnal plat approval.
Written Testimony: lVike Wardle (response to the staff report) - The applicant agrees with condition #1.1.1a that
requires the plat & landscape plan to be revised pior to the Council
meeting to provide for a round-a-bout (RAE) tq
be split between the sublect propely & the prope y to the nofth; if the
propedy owner to the nofth is prepared to
participate in the dedicatbn of ROW & cost of construction on a 50/50 basis at the time of construction, the applicant
will construct the RAB with the 1a phase; If the propeiy owner to the norlh is unwilling or unable
to participate at that
time, the applicant will design the RAB so that R)W boundaies are determined, but design & construct the road
without the RAB, including inteim connections to sevice drives; they will dedbate ROW on their properly for the
future RAB and submt funds for the conslruclrbn cosls of the RAB /ess desrgn cosfs and des,gn & conslruclion cosls
for the interim street section. At the time the neighboring propefty owner plds any porlion
of his property, he would
be obligated to construct the full RAB, including modtfications to any interim access points.
Staff Recommendation: Approval M a development agreement perthe staff report, along with a modification to
provision #1 .1.2a & the addition of the terms pertaining to the RAB in the applicants response letter, as previously
mentioned.
notes: flbn46&I > miLL u.tn-dk
affi
v
THE LAND GROUR INC.
www.thelandgrou pinc.com
TRANSM ITTAL
v1008
Eagle
462 Il Shore Dr, Suitc 10t)
Ilaglc, Idaho 83616
P 2t)8.939.4041
F 208.939.4445
Transmitted Via: f Courier Fed Ex US Mail UPS Pick Up Fax
To:
Company:
Address:
Phone #
Sonya Watters
City of Meridian
33 E. Broadway Ave
Meridian, lD 83642
(208) 884-ss33 Project #
Roger Collins
07l1-9l20t2
Ten Mile Crossing
110064
Fax #:
CC:
Pages I
I
Copies Date Pages Description
12 sets 07lL6lL2 5 Preliminary Landscape Plans
lf enclosures are not os noted, kindly notify us immediotely.
Notes
,
Site Planning o Landscape Architecture e
Civil Engineering r Golf Course lrrigation & Engineering r
Graphic Design o Surveying
From:
Date:
Project:
Re:
KELLER
associates
Letter of Transmittal
Date: July 19,2012
To: Ms. Sonya Watters
Planning Department
City ol Meridian
33 East Broadway
Meridian, lD 83642
Subject: Brighton Corp. - Ten Mile Crossing, Preliminary Plat
Enclosed are the following items:
Date Copies No Description
12 Preliminary PlAt Submittal (full-size)
These are transmitted:
E For your
files
E For action tr
specified above
For review
and approval
For your use E As requested
Sincerely,
KELLEB ASSOCIATES, INC.
Nathan Cleaver, P.E./al
Enclosure(s)
Projecl No.: 209047-006
cc: File
131 SW sTH A\,ENUE, SUITE A, MERIUIAN,IOAHO 83642 [2O8]
28e1992
ll enclosutes a@ not as noted, dease now
us at once
,/
A-
City of Meridian Development Review
Agency Comments Meeting
Planner: dt, Date: 7'Z;-tz- Date of List:
Project Name:
Fire sentative
Notes:
A B C D
1 3 4 (a 10 1l :13 t9
5^ 7 8 9 t2 14 15 lo (rz) (ra) 20
2I 22 zJ/ (2+) 25 3o- 3l 38
Qo.t 27 28 29 32 33 6D, 37 39
35 66,
41 A1
43 44 45 46 48 49
Notes:
tative:
A B C D E
71 72 73 74 75 76 78
Sani Services
Notes:
tative
A B C
1 2 3 97 98
Parks
Notes:
ve
6 46 47 79 80 81 82 83 84 85
Public Works tive
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 t2 13 t4 15 t7 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 28 29 30
Notes:
Rev.6/6/12
2
47
r=T fT-r
---f-t T fl 60
Police m T fl r-T_T_--r_T_-l l
ttlll rT-m f-T_-r
rI|rLILl
8 16
27 .--t--
3 THE PUN
DEsGN
,\t)l)licoiion oi lhe Desig,r Eleorenls
Th€ molrlx on lhlr pog6 ond ih€ igurer lhol lollow
summorlze lhe oppllcollon ol lh€ dEslgn elemenk
a
a a a
o
DE
a a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
M
a
o
o
a
a
a
a
o
o
a
a
Pos6 . oedgn Esment
MUR MUC LC CIvlc
3-32. Archlt..tlr. .nd H.ritrg. a a a a
3-33. str..t od.nt.d a€dgn
Commer€lal & mlxed use bldgs. a a
Residentlal Bulldlng; a
3-34. Bulldlng. to Scrl. a a a
3-35. Gatdraya
3-36,I.lghborhood D.dgn a l,
3-37. Buildlng Fo.m a Ch.r.ct r a a
Commerclal Actlvlty Centers a
Sulldlng facades a a a a
Bulldlng Helghts a a a a a
General Llmlnt of4 stortes a a a
Flrst Eloor Celllnt H€rghts for Ret.rl a a
Up to 6 Storles a
Ba3e, aody, and Top a a
Commerclal Retall Frontage a a
Llv€ /Work Unlt FrontagE a a
Commerclal DlstricLs a a
ntlal & titu a
a a
a a a a
3-41. ng D.ta
Ivlat€rlals
o a
o
c a
o
a a o
lrtrd
Sonya Watters
Sent:
To:
Cc:
From Mike Wardle IMWardle@brightoncorp.com]
Monday, September 17,2012 5:12 PM
Machelle Hill; Jaycee Holman; Jacy Jones
Peter Friedman; Sonya Watters; David Turnbull; Matt Smith; Jay Walker; Craig Hilbig
(craighilbig@gmail.com)
TM Crossing Staff Report for 9/18 CC Mtg
To: Meridian CiA Council
We have reviewed the Planning & Zoning Commission's recommendation to the City Council that the
Ten Mile Crossing Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Annexation/Zoning, and Preliminary Plat
applications be approved. We concur with the analysis, recommendations, hndings, and proposed
conditions of approval, with:
One specific request: That the Council waive the UDC I l-3A-6A.3.a requirement for covering the
Purdam Drain as requested per Item II.d.i on page 2 of the Staff Report;
And one condition modification: As written, compliance with Condition 1 .1.2.e (Staff Report, page
29) is not possible. That condition states:
"A Welcome to Meridian sign shall be constructed at the developer's expense on the subiect
propertv visible from the I-84 off-ramp [underlinedfor
emphasisJ to Ten Mile Road. The developer
shall coordinate the design and location of the sign with City Planning staff."
The project's frontage on Ten Mile Road is well below the grade of the interchange and roadway
embankment. Thus, it is not possible to construct the welcome sign "on the subject property. " Our
concern was specifically discussed with staff during a review of the P&Z Commission's
recommendation on August 29fr. Given the fact that properties west of Ten Mile Road, as well as both
sides north to Franklin Road, share this new "goteway " to the City and should participate in providing
the sign by condition when they plat, we ask that Condition 1 .1.2.e be modified, as follows:
A Welcome to Meridian sign shall be constructed
@northoftheI-84off-ramptoTenMileRoad.Thedevelopershallcoordinate
the fundine, design and location of the sign with City Planning staff and the commercial
development properties alons Ten Mile Road, north to Franklin Road.
We look forward to answering questions the Council may have concerning the project.
Mike Wardle
Director of Planning
Brighton Corporation
287.0512
From : Sonya Watters lmailto : swatters@meridianciW.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September L2,20LZ 2:02 PM
To: Machelle Hill; Jaycee Holman; Jacy Jones
Subject:
1
Sonya Watters
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Peter Friedman
Tuesday, September 18, 2012 7:57 AM
Sonya Watters
FW: TM Crossing Staff Report for 9/'18 CC Mtg
\ North of Franklin Road? Let's discuss before tonight
Thx
From: Mike Wardle Imailto: MWardle@brightoncorp.com]
Senh Monday, September 17, ZOIZ 5il2 PM
To: Machelle Hill; laycee Holman; Jacy Jones
Cc: Peter Friedman; Sonya Watters; David Turnbull; Matt Smith; Jay Walker; Craig Hilbig (craighilbig@gmail.com)
Subject: TM Crossing Staff Repoft for 9/18 CC Mtg
To: Meridian City Council
We have reviewed the Planning & Zoning Commission's recomrnendation to the City Council that the
Ten Mile Crossing Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Annexation/Zoning, and Preliminary Plat
applications be approved. We concur with the analysis, recommendations, findings, and proposed
conditions of approval, with:
One snecific request: That the Council waive the UDC I l-3A-6A.3.a requirement for covering the
Purdam Drain as requested per Item II.d.i on page 2 of the Staff Report;
And one condition modification: As written, compliance with Condition I . 1.2.e (Staff Report, page
29) is not possible. That condition states
'LA Welcome to Meridian sign shall be constructed at the developer's expense on the subiect
DroDertv visible from the I-84 off-ramp lunderlined for
emphasisl to Ten Mile Road. The developer
shall coordinate the design and location ofthe sign with City Planning staff,',
The project's frontage on Ten Mile Road is well below the grade of the interchange and roadway
embankment. Thus, it is not possible to construct the welcome sign "on
the subject property. " O\r
concem was specifically discussed with staff during a review of the P&Z Commission's
recommendation on August 29'h. Given the fact that properties west of Ten Mile Road, as well as both
sides north to Franklin Road, share this new "gateway " to the City and should participate in providing
the sign by condition when they plat, we ask that Condition l. 1.2.e be modified, as follows:
A Welcome to Meridian .sign shall be constructed
p+opfi+y +isibt€ from north of the I-84 off-ramp to Ten Mile Road. The developer shall coordinate
the fundinq, design and location of the sign with City Planning staff and the commercial
develon ment D roDerties along Ten Mile Road. north to Franklin Road.
We look forward to answering questions the Council may have conceming the project
1
Peter Friedman
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Mindy Wallace IMwallace@achdidaho. org]
Wednesday, August 15,20121:38 PM
Peter Friedman
RE:Ten Mile Crossing Conditions
Pete,
Thank you for the opportunity to review Brighton's proposal. Staff is generally supportive
of the proposal noted
below, however, ACHD has no official position untilthe Commission takes an action. Additionally, the
Commission must first approve moving the location of the collector.
Thanks,
Mindy
From : Peter Friedman fmai lto : pfriedman @merid ia ncity.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 201212:36 PM
To: Mindy Wallace
Cc: Sonya Watters
Subject: FW: Ten Mile Crossing Conditions
Mindy,
Any thoughts?
Pete
From : M ike Wa rd le fmailto : MWa rd le@ brightoncorp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August t5,201212:05 PM
To: Peter Friedman; Sonya Watters
Cc: David Turnbull; Steve Smith (stevescsinvestmen ); Matt Smith;
Craig Hilbig (craiohilbig@gmail.com); Jay
Walker
Subject: Ten Mile Crossing Conditions
Peter and Sonya,
On behalf of the Applicant, please note our agreement with the Ten Mile Crossing staff
report, analysis, and recommended conditions of approval. Forclarity, we offer the-:--
following statement concerning the roundabout issue.
The Applicant concurs with the requirement of Annexation and Zoning Paragraph 1.L.La, as
discussed with the staff of both Meridian City and ACHD, and will provide a revised concept
plan, preliminary plat, and landscape plan prior to the City Council meeting, based on the
following:
We will provide for a RAB to be split between the two properties
1
a
\-/ \-
. lf the neighboring property owner is prepared to participate in the dedication of
ROW
and cost of construction on a 50/50 basis at the time we are prepared to construct, we
. will lf the construct neighboring the RAB property with our owner first in phase.unwilling or unable to participate at that time, we
will:
" design the RAB so that Row boundaries are determined, but
o design and construct the road without the RAB, including interim connectjons to
service drives
oRAB o €sct'ow dedicate . design funds ROW costs for on the our construction property for costs the future of the RAB lpss:
.section At the time ' the design neighboring and construction property costs owner for plats the any interim portion street of his property,
he
would be obligated to construct the full RAB, including modifications to any
interim access points.
Please let me know if you have any questions,
Mike Wardle
2
Sofiya Watters
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mike Wardle [MWardle@brightoncorp.com]
Wednesday, August 15,2012 8:31 AM
Peter Friedman; Terri Ricks; Sonya Watters
Scott Steckline; David Turnbull; Steve Smith (stevescsinvestments@gmail.com); Matt Smith;
Jay Walker; Nathan Cleaver (ncleaver@Kellerassociates.com)
( ncleaver@Kellerassociates. com )
RE: TM Crossing Street Name Evaluation
Thankyou! Forthesakeoftheneighborhood,wewill makeabriefpointconcerningthematter-forthe
record-using this graphic and the stated reasoning in my response to Terri on Monday ("boxed" below).
Teri,
We will appeal that street name. ln our two meetings with the neighborhood, we encountered real concern
for the possibility of extending Verbena--which we neither propose nor support. But of equal concern, is the
fear that people from the community, thinking that Verbena must connect through from Linder, would
mistakenly drive into and negatively impact their neighborhood.
Thus, we will request a different name and will work with the Street Naming Committee to find a suitable
alternative.
Mike lVatdle
From : Peter Friedman [mailto: pfriedman@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 75,2072 B:22 AM
To: Terri Ricks; Sonya Watters
Cc: Scott Steckline; Mike Wardle
Subject: RE: TM Crossing Street Name Evaluation
1
\y,
OK the iSsJe is settled fo, ,oXlhe Commission can act on the annexation, CPA and preliminary plat without addressing
( no'pun intended) the street name. There should be a condition added that requires a new street name be approved by
the Street Name Committee or Planning Commission prior to final plat approval. This gives
the applicant time to propose
an new name and go through the process.
Pete
From: Terri Ricks
Sent: Wednesday/ August 75,2012 7:58 AM
To: Peter Friedman; Sonya Watters
Cc: Scott Steckline
Subject: RE: TM Crossing Street Name Evaluation
He hasnt informed us of any names yet; just that they'll come up with some alternatives.
Terri Ricks
Addressing Technician
Community Development Depaftment
33 E. Broadway Ave., Suite 102
Meridian, ID 83642
Ph: (208) BB7-2277 Fax: (208) BB7-1297
E-Mail: tricks@meridianciV.org
From: Peter Friedman
Sent: Wednesday, August 15,2072 7:52 AM
To: Terri Ricks; Sonya Watters
Cc: Scott Steckline
Subject: RE: TM Crossing Street Name Evaluation
Does Mike have a name proposed?
From: Terri Ricks
Sent: Tuesday, August 14,2072 3:40 PM
To: Sonya Watters; Peter Friedman
Cc: Scott Steckline
Subject: TM Crossing Street Name Evaluation
Hi Sonya:
I didn't know if I already sent this to you. Attached is the evaluation by the Street Name Committee recommending
"Verbena" be used in the place of the two street names proposed by the developer. Will this be all that's needed for
Thursday night? Also, do I need to be there, or is this something you would normally take care oP
Thank,
Terri Ricks
Addressing Technician
Comm un ity Development Department
33 E. Broadway Ave., Suite 102
Meridian, ID 83642
Ph: (208) BB7-2271 Fax: (208) BB7-7297
E-Mail: tricks@meridiancity,org
2
! SIG: 5 02bb 097 1903217 5 69 | 1 440
Barbara Shiffer
From:
Sent:
Subject:
Machelle Hill
Wednesday, July 25, 2012 2:27 PM
FW: City of Meridian Dev App - TM Crossing Subdivision
From: Machelle Hill
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 2:26 PM
Subject: City of Meridian Dev App - TM Crossing Subdivision
I
l$&Hs
City of Meridian
City Clerk's Office
33 E. Broadway Avenue
Meridian, lD 83642
Planning and Zoning Commission
D ev e lo p me n t App I ic atio n Tr a ns mttt {tl
To: Citv Departments Comments due by: August 9.,2012
Transmittal Date: July 25,2012 File No.: CPAM 12-001, AZt2-005 & PP 12-003
Hearing Date: August 16,2012
Request: Public Hearing - Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to
change the land use designation on 75.5 acres of land from LC (Lifestyle Center),
MHDR (Medium High Density Residential) aild HDE (High Density Employment) to
MUC (Mixed Use Commercial); Annexation and Zoning of 89.22 acres of land from
the RUT zoning district to the C-G (General Retail & Service Commercial) zoning
district AND Preliminary Plat approval of 50 commercial building lots and 4
common/other lots on 75.5 acres of land for TM Crossing Subdivision
By: Brighton Investments, LLC, Steven Smith and CRS10
Location of Property or Project: Northeast corner of I-84 and S. Ten Mile Road
The City of Meridian is requesting comments and recommendations on the application referenced above. To review
detailed information about the request, please click on the file number above to take you directly to the application.
We request that you submit your comments or recommendations by date specified above. When responding, please
reference the file number of the project. lf responding by email, please send comments to clerk@meridiancitv.orq.
For additional information associated with this application please contact City Clerk's Office at number below.
Thank you,
Machelle Hill
Meridian City Clerk's Office
33 E. Broadway Avenue
Meridian, lD 83642
(208) 888-4433
mhill@meridiancitv. orq
1
o
o
o
o
o
a a
a
a
o
o
a
a
a
a
o
a
a
a
ITEIN
a
a
a
a
a
a
o
screentns oiM;A;;ic;iGi6;;A= a a a a a a
a a
Canoples a
a a a a
a a a a a a a a a a a
IEEIEEEEII
EI II
II
EI I
I
II
ET Ir
I
II
EII
II I
ErII I
I ErrI
II
II
II
q
Ir
I
ET
EIEIT III IET[ErEIXM
III ITEI
III IIEI (
rDR 1-49
{,
0
e
c
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
c
o
O
to
I
t
a
D
D
Ia
ID
D
tD
D
ID
,
D
I
a
a
a a o
a o
a a
a
c
a
a
Pltched a
a
a
a
o
3-46. Slgnt a c a
a a
CI
"t -l
7
'1
r
rr h
Lrt
o' --"1
:l
a) a
to
2.
:,
gq
a t
"t
Ot
Tm [ia0redrq
t.l.) Hilil@Plantffil RopoeedReure Conc4t Slie Arnmthn md
.a
't
I
!$
h 0t
o
{
jt
ti
E fi s1
ln
ift
a
1
II
-\
r+
s
\
o
!\I
qt
h
o
h
U
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
il
tr
I
l(D
lo-
lo
lo t:f
lo
lo to
lu)
(D
T
lg)
l=
t, lb
lc
tog
o
o
5o
5o
Qo
o,
'n
5
q
!o)
.D
5
0,
o
a S.
2
-{
(vmmI tt
:\_:
I
I
I
I
1-
I
L
I
Proposed Concept Site Plan
l5
IG
Ten Mile Crossing
Annexation and Rezone
,"* Brighton Corporation ldab
I
a t
obJ !
E@i
I ____ __ __,7---\..
I nlmoqeq
o Floodplain boundary
(residential districts only)
a
I
a
/ a slte for ,
schools, churches or other USES
a Proposed common area lots and./or landscape easements
Appricantraeent:bl-LLC, fu/s{r F r* ^C25
t O,/ tltlf N#- l.;-.kHailt
(All
/
development. (e. s.. larser properties,
etc.)
o Scale (not less than l"=100')