AZ-13-010 PP-13-022 CUP-13-010 Application Checklist-,shtelopMa'rr UL
Planning Department
:l :r*r i i'-:.:;-? ANNEXATIONiREZONE r Application Checklist
lt ,l
is required to contain one copy of the following:
Note: Only one copy oJ the above item.r need be subrnined v,hen submittirtg multiple applications
Additional Requiremens for Annexatior/Rezone Applications:
APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ALL APPLICABLE ITEMS ON THE CHECKLIST ARE
SUBMITTED.
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102 r Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 o Facsimile:
(208) 888-6854 o Website: www.meridianciry.org
(Rev. 02/08/201 3)
name: c NWL t/l9totL
lhNk NILV- iuatt>
& & Review
Narrative fully describing the proposed proiect
Legal description of the property to be annexed and/or rezoned
Idaho State Tax Conunission Property Tax Adrninistrative Rules IDAPA 35.01.03.225.01.h.
r If requestilrg nr<ne than one zoning desiglation, include a legal description for each zone along *'ith al overall
annexation/rezone boundary descdption- Also include the boundaries of erh different zone on the map.
*Note: When also suhmitting a Preliminary Plat application, a separae legal d.evription is requiredfor the
howdaries of the plat, excludinq nroperty lo the section line as required
for annetalionirezorws.
of all roadways, stamped & signed by a
registered professional land surveyor.
legal descripiou in compliance w/ the requirenrents of the
o Include a metqs & botuds description to
. Scaled exhibit rnarp showing the bourdaries
Recorded warranty deed for the subiect property
Affidavit of Legal Interest signed & notarized by the property owner ([f ounu' is a corpuation,
submit a copy ofthe Anicles oflrrcorporation or other evidence to show drat the person signilrg is an autlmrized agent)
Scaled vicinity map showing the location of the subiect property
Provide concept plan lnoads.
aeess Enints, parking. genual layout ofbuildings and building elevations.)
Pre-application meeting notes (All applic*ions that require a public hearing arc required to conduct a pre-
application meeting with the PlanniDg Department.)
Neighborhood meeting sign-in sheet (Applicants are required to hold a neighborimd nrcting to pmvide
an @ponunity for public review of the
pro@sed proiect prior to the submiral of arr application.)
Commitment of Property Posting form signed by the appticant/agent
Parcel verihcation letter from Development Services (887-221l)
Fee (Please call Planning Department to calculate correct fee. Applications with
incorrect fees will not be accepted.)
nlt
If this application is not accompanied by a plat, conditional use permit, or planned unit
development application, submit a conceptual development plan and elevations for the
property (also submit an electronic version of the plan(s) in pdf format on a disk with the file named
with narne &
::lr::
::|::::j
l::::::,i;4,
:r::ili
',,:a::'r,,:,:
j/:,,
,rii::l:G=:
::t .,::,!ill
i:r::.:l:t::::tJi;:
l:ij,{/,::::iil,
* klt e I ep,"e--,,n- LL C-
Planning DiYision
ALTERNATM COMPLIANCE r Application Checklist
name: 5rr',ri-oan+ h4 o WL Ed Ut9ra*)
lana Ntck-
A11 applications are required to contain one copy of the following unless otherwise noted:
THIS APPLICATION SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE UNTIL STAFF HAS RECEIVED ALL
REQUIRED INFORMATION.
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102 r Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 r Facsimile: (208)
888-6854 o Website: www.meridiancity.org
(Rcv. 02/08D.012)
Completed & signed Administrative Review Application
1If alrc submiting a corcurrent application for
a preliminary plat or cordirional use lnrmit,
tlrc Altemative
Complimce reqrest will be pruressed along with that applicarion- Tlurefore, an Administraive Review application
is not necessary
-n
this case; jurt chec* the Ahemative Compliance hot on Commission & Council Review
Attplicailon urd submit the infonmtim belosv-)
Narrative fully describing the proposed request including the following:
feasible
requirenrents provides an equal or superior means of meeting the intent and purpose
of the regulation
Fee
d{.
iir
t':
fr WrtebPPlbltr LIL
ol{. Planning Division
CONDIIONAL USE PERMI r Application Checklist
All applications are required to contain one copy of the following:
Note: Only one copy of the above items need be submitted when submitting multiple applications
Additional requirements for Conditional Use Permit applications:
33 E. Broadway Avenue. Suite 102 r Meridian. Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 r Facsirnile: (208)
888-6854 r Website: www.meridianciry.org
1Rev. 02/08201 3)
cctl3qc nalne: I ,+6e fAcbNwuf,nilBroN rile*: frt)?'
htlurck- . k De,.L 6Je ) NwtS
Applicant
({)
Staff
d)
Completed & signed Commission & Council Review Application :::,,,:,::i;/
Narrative fully describing the proposed pmiect
Legal description of the subject property (Ld, Btock, and SuMivision nanre if located in a recorded
subdivision OR a nctes and bounds leml descriotion of dre orooeny if not in a suMivision.)
t/ Recorded warranty deed for the subiect property l .2
Affidavit of Legal Interest signed & notarized by the property owner (If owner is a corpor.rdon,
submit a copy of dre Anicles of lrcorporation or oher evidence to strow that the person signing is an authorized agent.)
Scaled vicinity map showing the location of the subiect property
Pre-application meeting notes (All applications that require a public heafing are required to conduct a pre-
application meeting with the Planning Department.)
Neighborhood meeting sign-in sheet lApplicants are required to hold a neig*rbortrood rrcaing m provide
an opportunity for public review of the proposed proiect prior to the submittal of an application.)
Commitment of Property Posting form signed by the applicant/agent
Parcel verification letter fiom Development Services (887-221l)
Fee
Applicant
r{r
Description
Staff
({)
Site Plan-*I copy (folded to 8 /2" x I I" size)
The followine itenrs must be included on the site plan:
t/ a Date, scale, north arrow, and proposed project nanre
)/ a Dinrensions
a Name, address and phone number ofowner(s), applicant, and engineer, surveyor
or planner who prepared the site plan
t/ a Existing boundaries, property lines, and dimensions of the lot
a Relationship to adiacent properties, streets, and private lanes
t/ a Easements and right-of-way lines on or adiacent to the lot
a Existing and proposed zoning ofthe lot, and the zoning and land use of all
adiacent properties
o Building location(s)
a Parking, bicycle parkinp facilities, and loadins areas
a Traffic access drives
e Open/common spaces
a Refuse and service areas
a Utilities plan, including the following:
Sewer, water, irrigation, and storm &ainage (existing & proposed)
l/ Reduction of the site plan (8 W' x ll"') ,',,,;1
Description
,t','
l*
\--/
q<
Landscape plan -
* l copy (folded to 8
yz" x I l " size)
PIunnusthaveasculenosmallertluuI"=50'(l"=20'ispreJbrred)urulbeonasandard
dru*,ing sheet, not tu exceed 36" -r 48" Q4" x
36" is preferred). A pkut whic'h cannot be drawn in
its entire4n on a single sheet nl,ust be drown wilh appropiate molch lines on rw*o or more sheels-
The following iterns must be included on the landscspe plan:
i::i::i::::aii.::,::
.: : r:a:.:,!: l.,ri
-:-ai.::::::iill
aname Date, scale, north arow, and proiect
a Dinrensions
Names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the developer and the person and/or
frm preparing tlre plan
Existing narural features such a^s canals, creeks, drains, ponds, wetlands,
floodplains, high groundwater areas, and rock outcroppings.
a Location, size, and species of all existing trees on site with trunks 4 inches or
greater in diameter, measured 6 inches above the ground. Indicate whether the
tree will be retained or removed.
A statement of how existing healthy trees proposed to be retained will be
protected from damage during construction
:::i:l:i:::::i:::liilr:ii
iilii,il,iiii
a Existing buildings, structures, planting areas, light poles, power poles, walls,
fences, berms, parking and loading areas, vehicular drives, trash areas, sidewalks,
pathways, stormwater detention areas, signs, street firrninre, and other man-made
elements.
a Existing and proposed contours for all areas steeper thao}O7c slope. Berms shall
be shown with one-foot contours. ::::i.i:j:
a Sieht Trianeles as def,rned in I l-3A--5 of this ordinance.
r Proposed landscaping with tree locations only
a Proposed screening structures
a Calculations of project componenls to demonstrate compliance with the
requiremenls of this ordinance, including:
D Number of street trees and linetrl feet of street frontage
> Width of street buffers lexclusive of righrof-way)
> Width of parking lot perimeter landscape strip
} Buffer width between different land uses
D Number of parking stalls and percent of parking area with internal lardscaping
) Total nurnber of trees and tree species mix
D Mitigation for removal of existing trees, including number of caliper inches
being renroved
l,:' .it: t::
, ,t
:,,
Reduction of the landscape plan (8 72" x I l") :::'ll
Buildine elevations showing construction materials
Electronic version of the site plan, landscape plan, & building elevations in pdf format
submitted on a disk with the files named with project narne & plan type 1i.e.
site plan,
landscape plan, elevations, etc.). We encourage you to submit at least one color version for
presentation purposes.
rl* If applying for approval of a public school, provide additional information as required by
the Public School Facility supplemental checklist per 967-6519.
Ts Helo?Ne*sr LtL
Director may require additional information conceming the social, economic, ft,scal or environtnental
e.Jfects oJ the
p roposed conditional use.
*Once an application is accepted, stafi'will contact you to let you
d{, Planning Division
PRELIMINARY PLAT r Application Checklist
A11 applications are required to contain one copy of the following:
Note: Only one copy o;f the above items need be submitted when submining multiple applications
Additional Require menls for Preliminary Plat App I ic atio ns :
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102 r Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 o Facsimile:
(208) 888-6854 r Website: www.meridiancity.org
(o2/8D013)
name: E , W LilL / tW kn U,tta12-t rr*e,gi,i,ttats witpiu J *r"u,
Applicartt
({)
Completed & signed Commission & Council Review Application
Staff
(J)
Narrative fully describing the proDosed proiect 4
Legal description of the subject property (tn. Block. and SuMivision name if located in a reca'ded
subdivision OR a nrtes and bourds legal description of the prooeny if n{x in a suMivision.) *
Recorded warranty deed for the subiect property
Affidavit of Legal Interest signed & notarized by the property owner (If o*ner is a corporuion,
submit a copy ofthe Articles oflncorporarion or tlfier evidence to show tlrat tlr person sigrring is an authorized agenr)
Scaled vicinity map showing the location of the subject property
Pre-application meeting notes (Al| applicaions that require a public hearing arc rcquircd to conduct a pre-
aoolication meeting u'ith the Planning Depanment.)
Neighborhood meeting sign-in sheet lApplicants are required ro hold a neighbortrmd nreting to pmvide
an opportunity fbr public review of the pr@osed pioiect prior to
the subnittal o[ an application.)
Cornmitment of Property Posting forrn signed by the applicant/agent Lat
Parcel verification letter from Development Services (887-221l)
Fee (Please call Planning Department to calculate correct J'ee.
Applications t'ith
incorrect fees will not be acce\ted-)
Applicant
d)
Descrlption
Staff
(J)
Include the following additional information in the project narrative:
the ordinarrce describing the particular provision, the variarrce requested, and the
reason thereof
development. (e.g., larger rear setback to buffer adioining properties, etc.)
Approval of the proposed subdivision name from the Ada County Surveyor's office Y
t/ Preliminary Plat-*l copy (lbtded to 8 /2" x I t" size)
The following items must be included on the preliminarv plat:
O Proposed subdivision nafirc (Do not use numbers in prelirninaly plat names.)
a Drafting date
o Section location and county (situate statement)
a North arrow
a Scale (not less than l"=100')
a Name, address and phone number ofowner(s), applicant, and engineer, surveyor or
planner who prepared the preliminary plat
Nlfr r Proposed sitels) for
parks, playgrounds, schools, churches or other public uses
fsDttetoPrvtffi LLL
Dcscription
l:.ii
e,
t/ a Proposed common area lots and/or landscape easements
a Streets, street names, rights-of-way and roadway widths, irrcluding adjoining streets
or roadways (details on plan)
Proposed and existing lot lines and blocks showing scaled dimensions and numbers
of each
a
Nl*symbols a a L,Minimum egend of residential house size (for R-2 and R-4 zones only)
a Contour lines shown at 5' intervals where land slope is greater than l0% and at 2'
intervals where land slope is loo/o or less, referenced to an established benchmark
including location and elevation
a Any dedications to the public and easerlents together with a statement of location,
Nlksuch a dimensions Floodplain boundary and purposes as determined of by FEMA or measures to amend this boundary
a Stub sEeets to provide access to adiacentundeveloped land or existing roadways
,/t a Block faces not rxlre than seven hundred fifty feet (750') in lengrh for residential
districts, and five hundred feet (500') in the TN{ & TN-R districts, without an
intersecting, street or alley, except as allowed in UDC t l-6C-3F.3
:::::
N/r+ Cul{e-sac lengths not in excess of 450'
a
Reduction of the preliminary plat (8 72" x I 1")
Landscape plan -
* I copy (folded to 8
t/2" x I l" size)
Pltn mnsthave u scale rut smallerthan I" = 50'(1"
=20'is preferretl) ond beona stundanldrawing
slrcet, not to exceed 36" x 48" (24" x j6" is preJbrred)- A plan which cannot be drawn in its enrirerl
on u single sheet must be drawn w,ith appropriate motth lines on rw,o or more sheets-
The following itenrs must be inclu&d on the landscape plan: q
a Qqqe,
sqale, north arrow, and project name
Names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the developer and the person and/or
firm preparing the plan
Existing natural features such as canals, creeks, drains, ponds, wetlands,
floodplains, high groundwater areas, and rock outcroppings.
a Location, size, and species of all existing trees on site with trunks 4 inches or
greater in diameter, nreasured 6 inches above the ground. Indicate whether ttrc tree
will be retained or removed.
a A statement of how existing healthy trees proposed to be retained will be protected
from damage during construction
a Existing buildings, structures, planting areas, light poles, power poles, walls,
fences, berrn^s, parking and loading areas, vehicular drives, trash areas, sidewalks,
pathways, stormwater detention areas, signs, street firrniture, and other nran-made
n/r a elements. Existing and proposed contours for all areas steeper iltan20%o slope. Berms shall
]/ a be Sight shown Triangles with one-as defined foot contours.in I l -3A-5 of this ordinance.
a Propose{ landscaping
a Plo?osed screeni ng s tructures
Calculations of project components to demons[ate compliance with the
requirenrents of this ordinance, including:
}trees }space > ! Width Number Residential Acreage of of dedicated street trees subdivision buffers, provided for common lineal trees on common feet open of street lot(s) frontage, and
number of street
I Mitigation for removal of existing trees
Reduction of the landscape plan (8 W' x ll") ',.',€
,/ sclentlst
Site report of the highest seasonal groundwater elevation prepared by a registered soils
ti TkleloP n'la.tr l.l.L
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102 o Meridian, tdaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 o Facsimile: (208)
888-6854 o Website: www.meridianciry.org
a
a
Wrinen confirmation that a trafhc impact snrdy is not required and/or has been submitted for
review to ACHD. Please contact Mindy Wallace at 387-6178 or Christy Little at 387-6144
for more information.
t/ Submit two (2) sets of corrceptual engineering plans It-
t/ Conceptual elevations of proposed structures, including building materials Pllofuta tl@l$
Electronic Submittal (Separate disks requircd) l,
t/
(l) Disk with electronic version of the conceptual engineering plans in a format
that complies with the Specifications for Project Drawings found at:
htto://www.meridiancitv.org/public workslautocad standardVindex.aso l,-
t/
1 I ) Electronic version of the preliminary plat & landscape plan in pdf format subrnitted
on a disk with the files named with project name & plan type (i.e. preliminary plat,
landscape plan, etc.). We encourage you to also subrnit at least one color version for
presentation purposes.
L
T5 >letoPr'4arr LLL
Supplernentary information at the discretion of the Director or Ci4,Engineer ma1,be required to stfficiently detail
the proposed dettelopment vtithin anv special development area, including but not limited to hill.ride, planned unit
development, Jloodplaitt, cemeter\, manufactured home parks,
and/or hazardous or unique areas of development.
'tOnce an application is accepted, staff v,ill contact you to let you knov, hotr many additional copies of plans are
required. All plans are required ro be fullglto 8 t/2"
x I l " size.
APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ALL APPUCABLE ITEMS ON THE CHECKLIST ARE
SUBMITTED. THIS APPUCATION SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE (NOR WILL A PIJBLIC
HEARINC BE SET) UNTIL STAFF HAS RECEIVED ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION.
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102 r Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 r Facsimile:
(208) 888-6854 r Website: www.meridianciry.orq
:
tlorr-s , ()ns
@w
ftLp^4 l}ttO - t<af \Ff,,-i4'.t/ y'
4r.'r, W
64 ,G rJ fr Uuo*t-/*t?l.lttl*! V
Planning Department
PROJECT REVIEW
UDC Survey and Plat Compliance
ect name: File #: I
Applicant/agent
1.1 Verify legal parcel
1.2 Review allowed use
1.3 Review district set back and dimensional standards
1.4 Identify any existing structures and/or easements
1.5 Check history GIS layer for past entitlements
2.1 For residential districts-PP (t DC I l-68-2) or combined PP/FP (UDC I l-68-4)
2.2For all other districts-PP (uDC 1l-68-2), SHP (UDC 11-68-5), or PP,TFP (UDC I t-68-4)
2.3 For surveys-PBA (UDC I l-68-8)
3.1 Sections 4,5,9 and 10 applicable for all projects
3 .2lf pivate streets are proposed section 6 applies (Chapter 3 Article F)
3.3 If open space is required per Chapter 4,6 or 7, section 7 applies (Chapter 3 Article G)
3.4 If located along a State Highwqy, section 8 applies (Chapter 3 Article H)
3.4 Check floodplain GIS layer, review standards in Title
10 Chapter 6, and coordinate with PW
4.1 Access to Streets
4.2 Bikeways
4.3 Ditches, Laterals, Canals or Drainage Courses
4.4 Fences
4.5 Pathways
4.6 Natural Features
4.7 Outdoor Lighting
4.8 Outdoor Service and Equipment Areas
4.9 Pressurized Irrigation Systems
4.10 Sidewalks and
4.11 Storm Drainage
4.12 Utilities
5.1 If applicant notes a specific use, determine if standards are listed for such use
5.2 Apply standards and inform applicant that such standards will apply at time of CZC approval
6.1 Application and fees
6.2 Apply standards
33 E. Broadway Ave. r Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 o Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 r Website: www.meridiancity.org
I2 /4/08)
0/
IDAHO
0ther
2.0 Verifo aporopriate application
3.0 Determine appropriate standards
4.0 Applv Chapter 3 Article A Standard Reculations in All Districts
6.0 Applv Chapter 3 Article F Private Street Requirements
5.0 Apply Chapter 4 Spec
7.1 Determine
7.4 Recreation amenities
7.2
7.amenities3 of life
7.5 Pedestrian or circulation amenities
7.6 Multi-modal facilities
8.1 Access
8.2
8.3 Noise abatement
cts offstreet parking and loading, apply standards and inform applicant that such
standards will at time of
9.1 Ifapplicant depi
9.3 Number
9.4 Use
9.9 Street
9.5 Location
9.10 Alternative
9.7
9.8
10.1 All standards applv
1.0.2 buffers streets
10.2.1 Size
10.2.2 Location
10.3
10.2.3 Material
lot
10.3.1 Size
10.3.2 Location
10.3.3 Material
10.4 buffers to USES
10.4.1 Size
10.4.2 Location
10.4.3 Material
10.6 Storm water ration
10.7 Path and ssibl from PW or
33 E. Broadway Ave. r Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 o Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 r website: www.meridiancity.org
5/20/20 t I
8.0 Eishwavs
9.6 Desisn
10.0 Apply Chapter 3 Article B Landscape Requirements
10.5 Tree preservation
TO:
FROM:
RE:
\/ \/ v\,
August 22,2013
TRANSMITTAL
Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager
Sonya Watters, Associate City Planner
Sffitoothrfil@ub. (PP- I 3-022)
/1'/rDbER-S,-Jd'
Enclosed are the
Remarks
The preliminary plat is scheduled before the Commission on September l9th. Thx!
Community Development Department . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102, Meridian, lD 83642
Phone 208-884-5533 . Fax 208-888-6854 r www.ffieridiancity.org
COPIES DESCRIPTION
2 sets Conceptual Engineering Plans
I Disk
These are transmitted:
n For your n For action ! For review ! For your use ! As requested
information specified below and comment
E
Communily Developmenl
Deporlmeni
IDIA CoXmuni[ Development Dept.
IDAHO Meridian
City Hall, Suite 102
33 E. Broadway Avenue
Merid ian. Idaho 83642
TRANSMITTAT MEMORANDUM
Matt Hoffman
Bruce Freckleton
McLinder Subdivision (aka Sawtooth Village) -
preliminary plat
August 23, 2013
To:
From:
Re:
Matt,
Attached are the electronic and hard copy conceptual engineering for the above named
development. These are being delivered to you for entry into
GIS for the purpose of
engineering modeling.
Than ks,
Bru
Changes to Agenda: None
Item *t4A, B, C: McLinder Subdivision/Sawtooth Village (AZ-,l3-0,l0; PP.13.022; CUP.,l3.010)
Application(s):
> ) >Zoning Annexation Conditional Preliminary & Plat Use Permit
Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of
'13 acres of land, is cunent,y zoned RUT in Ada County, and is
located at 4650 N. Linder Road on the SEC corner of N. Linder & W. McMillan Roads.
Adjacent Land Use & Zoning:
North: Commercial property (Walgreen's) in the development process, zoned C-N
South: Single-family resrdentral (Arch Rock Terrace Sub,), zoned R-8
East: Single{amily residential (Cobblefield Crossing Sub.), zoned R-8
West: N. Linder Road & vacant land, zoned L-0
Summary of Request: The applicant has submitted an application for annexatron & zoning of 13 acres of land with R-15 (6.43 acres)
and C-N (6.58 acres) zoning dlstricts consistent with the MU-N FLUII/ designation for this site. A preliminary plat
was also submitted for
l\/cLinder Subdivision consisting of 28 building lots (7 commercial & 21 IVFR) & 2 common/other lots on 11.88 acres of land. A CUP is
also requested for a multi-family development consisting of 84 dwelling units (21 two story 4-plexes) on 6.43 acres of land in a
proposed R-15 zoning district for Sawtooth Village. The gross density proposed is 13.07 dwelling units
per acre which is slightly above
the desired density of 6-12 units per acre desired in MU-N designated areas,
Access for the development is proposed via (1) right-in/right-out access off of N. Linder Road midway between Ann Taylor Street &
McMillan; (1) right-in/right-out access off McMillan approx. 300' east of the intersection & (1) full access off W. lVlcMillan Road approx.
500' east of the intemection, W, Ann Taylor Street at the SWC of the site will be widened to a full street section & will provide access
from the south, lnternal driveways are required to be in an easement providing access to all lots. Because the UDC restncts access to
arterial streets when access from a local street is available, the applicant requests a waiver from Council for the (3) access points
proposed via Linder & McMillan, both arterial streets . ACHD has not yet provided comments on this application as they are waiting for
the TIS to be revised.
The Lemp Canal runs along the north boundary of the site adjacent to McMillan Road; a couple of other ditches exist at the NEC of the
site, The UDC requires all wateruays to be piped unless improved as a water amenity or linear open space, or waived by Council when
the public purpose requinng such will not be served & public safety can be
preserved or due to a large capacity facility. The applicant
proposes to pipe approx. 300' of the Lemp Canal midway between the east & west boundanes but requests Council approval
of a
waiver to UDC 1 1-3A-64.3 to allow the remaining portion (approx. 485') to remain open due to its large capacity.
A section of the City's multi-use pathway system (Eagle lsland pathway)
is designated on this site along the east side of Linder Road.
Because there is akeady a sidewalk along Linder Road, the Park's Department is allowing the existing sidewalk to satisfy the pathway
requirement.
A 25' wide street buffer is required along Linder & Mcl\4illan and a 10' wide buffer is required along Ann Taylor, Common area & site
amenities are required for the residential portion of this development in accord with the subdivision & multi-family development
standads. A clubhouse, swimming pool, barbeque area w/picnic tables, a playground, pathway to the common areas, and an
additional 5% open space are proposed as amenilies,
Conceptual building elevations were submitted by the applicant that represents the type of construction planned for the site,
Written Testimony: Lance Warnick, Applicant - in agreement Mconditions except for condition #1.2.10 which requires bicycle
parki.s{ ,il
to be provided for each building or pair of buildings; he proposes a minimum of
7 different parking facilities in locations to be \ 1tu I f"
determined wistaff. The applicant also requests the following minor modifications which staff supports, tI rO
'
. Delete DA provision #1.1.e which requires a 10' wide pathway along Linder; and #'1,3.2 which requires a
public use easement
for the pathway.
Staff Recommendation: Approval dconditions; a DA is required to ensure the site develops as proposed.
Notes: ;c,t-- f.-,
Item #9G, H: McLinder SubdlVlsion/SaMooth Village (A2.13.010; PP.13.02tCUP.13.010)
Application(s):
iZoning >Plat i Annexation Preliminary Conditional & Use Permit
Sizeof property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of l3acresof land, rs cunently zoned RUTinAdaCounty, and is
located at the SEC corner of N. Linder & W. McMillan Roads at 4650 N. Linder Road.
Summary of Request: The applicant has submitted an application for annexation & zoning of 13 acres of land with R-15 (6.43 acres)
and C-N (6.58 acres) zoning distncts consistent with the MU-N FLUM designation for this site. A preliminary plat is proposed for'
Mclinder Subdivision consisting of 28 building lots (7 commercial & 21 MFR) & 2 common/other lots on 11.88 acres of land. A CUP is
requested for a multi-family development consisting of 84 dwelling units (21 t'/vo story 4-plexes) on 6.43 acres of land in a proposed
R-
15 zoning district for Sav'itooth Village. The gross density proposed is 13.07 dwelling units
per acre which is slightly above the desired
density of 6-12 units per acre desired in N/U-N designated areas.
Access for the development is proposed via (1) righlin/right-out access off of N. Linder Road midway between Ann Taylor Street &
lVlcMillan; and(1)full access off W. I/cMillan Road approx. 500' east of the intersection. Another nght-in/rightout access via McMillan
was proposed 300' east of the intersection; however, ACHD denied this access & the applicant submltted a revised plat accordingly. W
Ann Taylor Street at the SWC of the site will be widened to a full street section & will provide access from the south. Cobblefield Street
stubs at the east & south boundanes & is proposed to be extended across the SEC of the site, lntemal driveways are required to be in
an easement providing access to all lots. Because the UDC restricts access to arterial streets when access from a local street is
available, the applicant requests a waiver from Council for the (2) access points proposed via Linder & McMillan, both arterial streets.
The Lemp Canal runs along the north boundary of the site adjacent to lvlcMillan Road; a couple of other ditches exist at the NEC of the
site. The UDC requires all waterways to be piped unless improved as a water amenity or linear open space, or waived by Council when
the public purpose requiring such will not be served & public safety can be preserved or due
to a large capacity facility. The applicant
proposes to pipe approx. 300' of the Lemp Canal midway between the east & west boundanes but requests Council approval of a
waiver to UDC 11-3A-6A.3 to allow the remaining portion (approx, 485') to remain open due to its large capacity.
A section of the City's multi-use pathway system (Eagle lsland pathway)
is designated on this site along the east side of Linder Road.
Because there is already a sidewalk along Linder Road, the Park's Department is allowing the existrng sidewalk to satisfy the pathway
requirement.
A 25' wide street buffer is required along Linder & MclVillan and a 10' wide buffer is required along Ann Taylor. A detached sidewalk
already exists along Linder Road; a detached sidewalk is proposed along the south side of the Lemp Canal along lVcMillan; attached
sidewalks are proposed along Ann Taylor & Cobblefleld Streets. Common area & site amenities are required for the residential portion
of this development in accord with the subdivision & multi-family development standads. A clubhouse, swimming pool, barbeque area
w/picnic tables, a playground, pathway to the common areas, and an additional 570 open space are proposed as amenities.
Conceptual building elevations were submitted by the applicant that represents the type of construction planned for the site
Commission Recommendation: Approval
Summary i. ln favor: of Commission Lance Wamick, Public Aspen Hearing:Engineers; Penelope Riley, Riley Planning Services; Tom Bevan
ii. ln opposition: None
iii. Commenting: None
iv. Written testrmony: None
Key i. lssue(The s) number of Discussion of brcycle by racks Commission:needed for the multi-family portion of the development.
Key ii. i. Commission Strike lVlodification conditions Change(to condition #1 .1.s) e to & #1.#Staff 1.2.3.10 2 Recommendation:to requiring require a at multi-least use 10 pathway bicycle
racks along to Linder be provided Road as within one the is not multi-required; family and
development in
locations agreed upon by the applicant and stafi.
Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: None NAK '
, O2tstanding tssue(s)for.City Councit: None l./il
Wf : Ua '
^4.n4/e
z/alt-lttkt
Lbm $gYa-tt--t
/hi/,'74 e/%
V
eo rrr.r"-trTeot do r",**;*
Development Services Department
\!-"
ProjecUFile
Lead Agency
Site address:
Staff
Approval:
McLinder Subdivision
This is an annexation, rezone, conditional use permit, and preliminary plat
application for a28 buildable lot subdivision (7 commercial, 21 multi-family, and
2common lots) on approximately 11.88 acres. The site is located at southeast
corner of McMillan and Linder Roads.
City of Meridian
4650 N. Linder Road
1
October 28,2013
Applicant: TS Development, LLC
4202 N. Marcliffe Avenue
Boise, lD 83704
Representative: Aspen Engineers
244212th Avenue Rd, # 323
Nampa, lD 83686
Staff Contact: Mindy Wallace
Phone: 387-6178
E-mail: @achdidaho.oro
A. Findinqs of Fact
Description of Application: The applicant is requesting annexation, rezone, conditional use
permit, and preliminary plat approval to subdivide 11.88 acres into 30 lots consisting of 7
commercial lots, 2l multi-family lots, and 2 common lots. The applicant's proposal is consistent
with the City of Meridian's Comprehensive Plan.
2. Descri of Surround Area
3. Site History: ACHD has not previously reviewed this site for a development application.
4. Transit: Transit services are not available to serve this site.
1
Direction Land Use Zoning
North General commercial C-G
South Sinsle-family residential R-8
East Single-family residential R-8
West Limited office L-O
McLinder
5. lmpact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any
building permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in
effect at that time.
6. Capital lmprovements Plan (ClP),/Five Year Work Plan (FYWP):
The following improvements are listed in the Diskict's Capital lmprovement Plan (ClP):
. Linder Road is listed in the Capital lmprovements Plan to be widened to s-lanes from l\./cMillan
to Chinden between 2022 and 2026.
. Linder Road is listed in the Capital lmprovements PIan to be widened to s-lanes from Ustick to
Mclvlillan between 2017 and 2021.
B. Traffic Findinqs for Consideration
1. Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 2,353 additional vehicle trips per
day (0 eristing); 152 additional vehicle trips per hour in the PM
peak hour (0 existing), based on
the traffic impact study.
2. Traffic lmpact Study
Thompson Engineers prepared a traffic impact study for the proposed McLinder Subdivision.
Below is an executive summary of the findings as presented by Thompson Engineers. The
following executive summary is not lhe oDinion of ACHD staff. ACHD has reviewed the
submitted traffic impact study for consistency with ACHD policies and practices, and may have
additional requirements beyond what is noted in the summary. ACHD Staff comments on the
submitted traffic impact study can be found below under staff comments.
Thompson Engineers, lnc. has been retained to prepare a traffic impact study for the proposed
Mclinder Subdivision (SaMooth Viilage) in [./eridian, ldaho. The propose of this study is to
evaluate the potential traffic impacts resulting from the project and make recommendations for
mitigation of the impacts.
The project is a multi-use development including approximately 88 multi-family dwelling units, and
53,000 SF of specialty retail.
The site is expected to access the transportation system via two accesses on Linder and McMillan
Roads.
The area of influence is anticipated to be Ada County, ldaho, including the City of Meridian. The
primary impacts will be along Mclvlillan Road and Linder Road. The study area will include the
irtersections of Linder Road and Mclvlillan Road, lreridian Road and McNIillan Road and Linder
Road and Ustick Road.
The site is within the City of Meridian and is currently partially vacant. Existing zoning and land
uses are for mixed use.
Based on the trip generation methods recommended in the Trip Generation Manual, the site will
generate 2,353 trip per day of which 38 will occur during the Alil peak hour and
'152 trips will
occur during the PM peak hour.
The site will access the transportation system via Linder and lvlcl,ilillan Roads.
The intersection of McMillan and Linder Roads will operate at acceptable levels of service under
background and total traffic conditions in the build out year. The critical peak hour is in the PM
peak hour.
The intersection of McMillan and Meridian Roads will operate at an acceptable levels of service
under background and total trafflc conditions in the build out year. The critical peak hour is the
PM peak hour.
2 l\rcLinder
The intersection of Linder Road and Coppercloud Road will operate at an acceptable levels of
service under background and total traffic conditions in the build out year. The critical peak
hour
is in the PM peak hour.
The site access points are anticipated to operate at an acceptable level of service. The hvo
access points closest to the intersection of Linder and [VlcMillan will be restricted to right-in and
right-out movements.
The proposed site plan provides good internal circulation via an internal commercial roadway.
Linder Road will operate at an acceptable level of service in the horizon year under background
traffic and total traffic conditions.
McMillan Road will operate at an unacceptable level of service in the horizon year under both
background traffic and total traffic conditions. Mitigation measures include the construction of a
center left turn lane. This mitigation measure is infeasible because there is limited ROW that is
out of control of the Sawtooth development, the mitigation measure is required for background
traffic conditions, and the mitigation measure is onerous compared to the impact from the site.
Staff Gomments/Recommendations: Staff has reviewed the submitted traffic impact study and
found that it meet's ACHD's minimum standards.
3. Condition of Area Roadways
Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour (VPH)
* Acceptable level of service for
a three-lane principal arterial is 'E' (880 VPH).
* Acceptable level of service for a three-lane minor arterial is "D" (720
VPH)
4. Average Daily Traffic Gount (VDT)
Average daily traffic counts are based on ACHD', most current traffic counts
The average daily traffic count for Linder Road south of McMillan was 10,349 on
7115t13.
The average daily traffic count for McMillan Road east of Linder was 3,993 on 7/15/13
Linder Road
a. Existing Conditions: Linder Road is improved with 5/6{ravel lanes, vertical curb, gutter,
bike lanes, and S-foot wide detached and 7-foot wide attached sidewalks. There is 86 to 98-
feet of right-of-way for Linder Road (38 to 50-feet from centerline).
b. Policy:
Arterial Roadway Policy: District Policy 7205.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for
improving all street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is taken
to all of the adjacent streets.
Master Street Map and Typology Policy: District Policy 7205.5 states that the design of
improvements for arterials shall be in accordance with District standards, including the Master
1
3
Roadway Frontage Functional
Classification
PM Peak
Hour
Traffic Count
PM Peak
Hour Level
of Service
Existing
Plus
Project
Future
Level of
Service
Linder Road 61Ojeet
Principal
Arterial
454
Better than
tr 685
Street Map and Livable Streets Design Guide The developer or engineer should contact the
District before starting any design.
Street Section and Right-of-Way Width Policy: District Policies 7205.2.1 & 7205.5.2 state
that the standard s-lane street section shall be 72-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) within
96-feet of right-of-way. This width typically accommodates two travel lanes in each direction, a
continuous center left-turn lane, and bike lanes on a minor arterial and a safety shoulder on a
principal arterial.
Right-of-Way Dedication: District Policy 7205.2 states that The District will provide
compensation for additional right-of-way dedicated beyond the existing righlof-way along
arterials listed as impact fee eligible in the adopted Capital lmprovements Plan using available
impact fee revenue in the lmpact Fee Service Area.
No compensation will be provided for right-of-way on an arterial that is not listed as impact fee
eligible in the Capital lmprovements Plan.
The District may acquire additional righlof-way beyond the site-related needs to preserve a
corridor for future capacity improvements, as provided in Section 7300.
Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7205.5.7 requires a concrete sidewalks at least s-feet wide to
be constructed on both sides of all arterial streets. A parkway strip at least 6-feet wide
between the back-of-curb and street edge of the sidewalk is required to provide increased
safety and protection of pedestrians. Consult the District's planter width policy
if trees are to
be placed within the parkway strip. Sidewalks constructed next to the back-of-curb shall be a
minimum of 7-feet wide.
Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway.
Meandering sidewalks are discouraged.
A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public srdewalks are
placed outside of
the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the righ!
of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located
wholly within the public rightof-way or wholly within an easement.
Minor lmprovements Policy: District Policy 7203.3 states that minor improvements to
existing streets adjacent to a proposed development may be required. These improvements
are to correct deficiencies or replace deteriorated facilities. lncluded are sidewalk construction
or replacement; curb and gutter construction or replacement; replacement of unused
driveways with curb, gutter and sidewalk; installation or reconstruction of pedestrian ramps;
pavement repairs; signs; traffic control devices, and other similar items.
ACHD Master Street Map: ACHD Policy Section 31 1 1 .1 requires the Master Street Map
(MSM) guide the righlof-way acquisition, arterial street requirements, and specific roadway
features required through development. This segment of Linder Road is designated in the
MSM as a Residential Arterial with S-lanes and on-street bike lanes, a 72-foot street section
within 98-feet of right-of-way.
c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant hasn't proposed any improvements to Linder Road
abutting the site.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: Linder Road is already built out with 5/6 travel lanes,
bike lanes, vertical curb, gutter, and sidewalk consistent with the MSM. Therefore staff does
not recommend any additional right.of-way dedication or street improvements for this
application.
4 McLinder
2. McMillan Road
a. Existing Conditions: McMillan Road is improved with 3i4travel lanes, bike lanes, vertical
curb, gutter, and no sidewalk abutting the site. There is 60 to 72-feet of righlof-way for
McMillan Road (25-feet from centerline).
b. Policy:
Arterial Roadway Policy: District Pollcy 7205.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for
improving all street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is taken
to all of the adjacent streets.
Master Street Map and Typology Policy: District Policy 7205.5 states that the design of
improvements for arterials shall be in accordance with District standards, including the Master
Street Map and Livable Streets Design Guide. The developer or engineer should contact the
Dishict before starting any design.
Street Section and Right-of Way Width Policy: District Policy 7205.2.1 & 7205.5.2 states
that the standard 3-lane street section shall be 46-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) within 70
feet of right-of-way. This width typically accommodates a single travel lane in each direction,
a continuous center left{urn lane, and bike lanes.
Right-of-Way Dedication: District Policy 7205.2 states that The District will provide
compensation for additional right-of-way dedicated beyond the existing right-of-way along
arterials listed as impact fee eligible in the adopted Capital lmprovements Plan using available
impact fee revenue in the lmpact Fee Service Area.
No compensation will be provided for right-of-way on an arterial that is not listed as impact fee
eligible in the Capital lmprovements Plan.
The District may acquire additional righlof-way beyond the site-related needs to preserve a
corridor for future capacity improvements, as provided in Section 7300.
Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7205.5.7 requires a concrete sidewalks at least S-feet wide to
be constructed on both sides of all arterial streets. A parkway strip at least 6-feet wide
between the back-of-curb and street edge of the sidewalk is required to provide increased
safety and protection of pedestrians. Consult the District's planter width
policy if trees are to
be placed within the parkway strip. Sidewalks constructed next to the back-of-curb shall be a
minimum of 7-feet wide.
Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway.
Meandering sidewalks are discouraged.
A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are
placed outside of
the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right-
of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located
wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement.
Minor lmprovements Policy: District Policy 7203.3 states that minor improvements to
existing streets adjacent to a proposed development may be required. These improvements
are to conect deficiencies or replace deteriorated facilities. lncluded are sidewalk construction
or replacement; curb and gutter construction or replacement; replacement of unused
driveways with curb, gutter and sidewalk; installation or reconstruction of pedestrian ramps;
pavement repairs; signs; traffic control devices, and other similar items.
ACHD Master Street Map: ACHD Policy Section 31 1 1 .1 requires the Master Street Map
(MSM) guide the right-of-way acquisition, arterial street requirements, and specific roadway
features required through development. This segment of McMillan Road is designated in the
MSM as a Residential Arterial with 3-lanes and on-street bike lanes. a 46-foot street section
within 74-feet of righlof-way.
5 McLinder
3
c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant is proposing to construct a S-foot wide detached sidewalk
on the south side of the Settlers Canal abutting the site.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meet's District Policy and
should be approved, as proposed. The applicant should be required to provide a permanent
right-of-way easement for the public sidewalks placed outside of the dedicated right-of-way.
The easement shall encompass the entire area between the rightof-way line and 2-feet
behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located wholly within the
public right-of-way or wholly within an easement.
McMillan Road is already built out with 3/4 travel lanes, bike lanes, vertical curb, and gutter
consistent with the MSM. Therefore staff does not recommend any additional righfof-way
dedication or street improvements for this application.
Ann Taylor Street
a. Existing Conditions: Ann Taylor Street is improved as a half of a 36-foot street section with
curb, gutter, and sidewalk on the south side of the roadway across from the site. Ann Taylor
Street is unimproved abutting the site. There is 40-feet of right-of-way for Ann Taylor Street.
b. Policy:
Local Roadway Policy: District Policy 7207.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for
improving all local street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is
taken to all of the adjacent streets.
Street Section and Right-of-Way Policy: District Policy 7207.5 states that right-of-way
widths for all local streets shall generally not be less than SO-feet wide and that the standard
street section shall be 36-feet (back-otcurb to back-of-curb). The District will consider the
utilization of a street width less than 36-feet with written fire department approval.
Standard Urban Local Street-36-foot to 33-foot Street Section and Right-of-way Policy:
District Policy 7207 .5.2 states that the standard street section shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to
back-of-curb) for developments with any buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size. This
street section shall include curb, gutter, and minimum s-foot concrete sidewalks on both sides
and shall typically be within so-feet of right-of-way.
The District will also consider the utilization of a street width less than 36-feet with written fire
department approval. Most often this width is a 33-foot street section (back-of-curb to back-
of-curb) for developments with any buildable lot that is less than 'l
acre in size.
Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7207.5.7 states that five-foot wide concrete sidewalk is
required on both sides of all local street, except those in rural developments with net densities
of one dwelling unit per 1.0 acre or less, or in hillside conditions where there is no direct lot
frontage, in which case a sidewalk shall be constructed along one side of the street. Some
local jurisdictions may require wider sidewalks.
The sidewalk may be placed next to the back-of-curb. Where feasible, a parkway strip at least
8-feet wide between the back-of-curb and the street edge of the sidewalk is recommended to
provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians and to allow for the planting of trees
in
accordance with the District's Tree Planting Policy. lf no trees are to be planted in the
parkway strip, the applicant may submit a request to the District, with justification, to reduce
the width of the parkway strip.
Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway
Meandering sidewalks are discouraged.
A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed
outside of
the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right-
6 McLinder
4
of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located
wholly within the public righlof-way or wholly within an easement.
c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing to complete Ann Taylor as a 36-foot street
section with curb, gutter, and S-foot wide attached concrete sidewalk abutting the site.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meet's District policy and
should be approved, as proposed. Ann Taylor Street should align centerline to centerline with
Ann Taylor Street on the west side of Linder Road across from the site.
Cobblefield Street
a. Existing Conditions: Cobblefield Street stubs to the srte's northeast and southwest property
lines, as a 36-foot street section with curb, gutter, and s-foot wide attached sidewalks within
5O-feet of righlof-way.
b. Policy:
Local Roadway Policy: District Policy 7207.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for
improving all local street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is
taken to all of the adjacent streets.
Street Section and Right-of-Way Policy: District Policy 7207.5 states that right-of-way
widths for all local streets shall generally not be less than so-feet wide and that the standard
street section shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). The District will consider the
utilization of a street width less than 36-feet with written fire department approval.
Standard Urban Local Street-36-foot to 33-foot Street Section and Right-of-way Policy:
District Policy 7207 .5.2 states that the standard street section shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to
back-of-curb) for developments with any buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size. This
street section shall include curb, gutter, and minimum S-foot concrete sidewalks on both sides
and shall typically be within sO-feet of right-of-way.
The District will also consider the utilization of a street width less than 36-feet with written fire
department approval. Most often this width is a 33-foot street section (back-of-curb to back-
of-curb) for developments with any buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size.
Continuation of Streets Policy: District Policy 7207.2.4 states that an existing street, or a
street in an approved preliminary plat, which ends at a boundary of a proposed development
shall be extended in that development. The extension shall include provisions for continuation
of storm drainage facilities. Benefits of connectivity include but are not limited to the following:
. Reduces vehicle miles traveled.
. lncreases pedestrian and bicycle connectivity.
. lncreases access for emergency services.
. Reduces need for additional access points to the arterial street system
o Promotes the efficient delivery of services including trash, mail and deliveries.
. Promotes appropriate intra-neighborhood traffic circulation to schools, parks,
neighborhood commercial centers, transit stops, etc.
. Promotes orderly development.
Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7207.5.7 states that five-foot wide concrete sidewalk is
required on both sides of all local street, except those in rural developments with net densitres
of one dwelling unit per 1.0 acre or less, or in hillside conditions where there is no direct lot
frontage, in which case a sidewalk shall be constructed along one side of the street. Some
local jurisdictions may require wider sidewalks.
7 McLinder
The sidewalk may be placed next to the back-of-curb. Where feasible, a parkway strip at least
8-feet wide between the back-of-curb and the street edge of the sidewalk is recommended to
provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians and to allow for the planting
of trees in
accordance with the District's Tree Planting Policy. lf no trees are to be planted in the
parkway strip, the applicant may submit a request to the District, with justification, to reduce
the width of the parkway strip.
Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway.
Meandering sidewalks are discouraged.
A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks
are placed outside of
the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right-
of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located
wholly within the public nghlof-way or wholly within an easement.
c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing to extend and complete Cobblefield Street
as a 36-foot street section with curb, gutter, and s-foot wide attached concrete sidewalk within
50-feet of right-of-way abutting the site.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meet's District policy and
should be approved, as proposed.
5. Driveways
7.1 Linder Road
a. Existing Conditions: There is one existing 28-foot wide median restricted right-in/right-out
driveway onto Linder Road located approximately 275-leel south of McMillan Road (measured
centerline to centerline).
b. Policy
Access Points Policy: District Policy 7205.4.1 states that all access points associated with
development applications shall be determined in accordance with the policies in this section
and Section 7202. Access points shall be reviewed only for a development application that is
being considered by the lead land use agency. Approved access points may be relocated
and/or restricted in the future if the land use intensifies, changes, or the property redevelops.
Access Policy: District policy 7205.4.7 states that direct access to principal arterials is
typically prohibited. lf a property has frontage on more than one street, access shall be taken
from the street having the lesser functional classification. lf it is necessary to take access to
the higher classtfied street due to a lack of frontage, the minimum allowable spacing shall be
based on Table 1b under District policy 7205.4.7, unless a waiver for the access point has
been approved by the District Commission. Driveways, when approved on a principal arterial
shall operate as a right-in/right-out only, and the District will require the construction of a
raised median to restrict the left turning movements.
Driveway Location Policy: District policy 7205.4.7 requires driveways located on principal
arterial roadways to be located a minimum of 355-feet from the nearest intersection for a right-
in/right-out only driveway. Full-access driveways are not allowed on prrncipal arterial
roadways.
Successive Driveways: District policy 7205.4.7 Table 1b, requires driveways located on
principal arterial roadways with a speed limit of 35 MPH to align or offset a minimum of 355-
feet from any existing or proposed driveway.
Driveway Width Policy: District policy 7205.4.8 restricts high-volume driveways (100 WD or
more) to a maximum width of 36-feet and low-volume driveways (less than 100 WD) to a
maximum width of 3O-feet. Curb return type driveways with 30-foot radii will be required for
high-volume driveways with 100 VTD or more. Curb return type driveways with 1S-foot radii
will be required for low-volume driveways with less than 100 VTD.
I McLinder
Driveway Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance
problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. ln accordance with District policy,
7205.4.8, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-
feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway and install pavement tapers in
accordance with Table 2 under District Policy 7205.4.8.
Temporary Access Policy: District Policy 7202.4.2 identifies a temporary access as that
which "is permitted for use until appropriate alternative access becomes available".
Temporary access may be granted through a development agreement or similar method, and
the developer shall be responsible for providing a financial guarantee for the future closure of
the driveway.
Cross Access Easements/Shared Access Policy: District Policy 7202.4.1 states that cross
access utilizes a single vehicular connection that serves two or more adjoining lots or parcels
so that the driver does not need to re-enter the public street system.
Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing to continue to utilize the existing 28-foot
wide median restricted righ!in/rig ht-out driveway to access the site.
Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal does not meet District
Access Management or Driveway Location policies; however, staff recommends a
modification of policy to allow the existing driveway to be located as proposed.
Staff's recommendation is due to the fact that ACHD approached the property owner of the
site several years ago about partnering with ACHD and 3 other property owners
(all 4 corners)
to widen and signalize the Linder/McMillan intersection. The owner of the parcel agreed to the
partnership and entered into a cooperative development agreement with the District for the
intersection improvements.
Although most of the parcels impacted by the intersection project were not developed, access
was designated through the project and driveways constructed, per the ACHD policy
manual
that was in effect at that time. The location of this driveway is consistent with the other corner
parcels that were a part of the Developer Co-Op project and is located
outside of the influence
area of the intersection.
The driveway should be paved it's entire width at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of
pavement.
7.2 McMillan Road
a. Existing Conditions: There are 3 existing driveways onto McMillan Road. They are located
as follows:
. One 30-foot wide median restricted righlin/right-out driveway located approximately
300jeet east of Linder road.
. One 35-foot wide full access driveway located approximately soo-feet east of Linder
Road.
o One 1S-foot wide full access driveway located approximately 745-leel east of Linder
Road.
b. Policy
Access Points Policy: District Policy 7205.4.1 states that all access points associated with
development applications shall be determined in accordance with the policies in this section
and Section 7202. Access points shall be reviewed only for a development application that is
being considered by the lead land use agency. Approved access points may be relocated
and/or restricted in the future if the land use intensifies, changes, or the property redevelops.
c
d
a McLinder
c
d
Access Policy: District policy 7205.4.6 states that direct access to minor arterials is typically
prohibited. lf a property has frontage on more than one street, access shall be taken from the
street having the lesser functional classification. lf it is necessary to take access to the higher
classified street due to a lack of frontage, the minimum allowable spacing shall be based on
Table 'la under District policy
7205.4.6, unless a waiver for the access point has been
approved by the District Commission.
Driveway Location Policy: District policy 7205.4.5 requires driveways located on minor
arterial roadways from a signalized intersection with a single left turn lane shall be located a
minimum of 330-feet from the nearest intersection for a rightin/right-out only driveway and a
minimum of 660-feet from the intersection for a full-movement driveway.
District policy 7205.4.5 requires driveways located on minor arterial roadways from a
signalized intersection with a dual left turn lane shall be located a minimum of 330-feet from
the nearest intersection for a right-in/right-out only driveway and a minimum of 71o-feet from
the intersection for a full-movement driveway.
Successive Driveways: District policy 7205.4.6 Table 1a, requires driveways located on
minor arterial roadways with a speed limit of 40 MPH to align or offset a minimum of 330{eet
from any existing or proposed driveway.
Driveway Width Policy: District policy 7205.4.8 restricts high-volume driveways (100 WD or
more) to a maximum width of 36-feet and low-volume driveways (less than 100 WD) to a
maximum width of 30-feet. Curb return type driveways with 3o-foot radii will be required for
high-volume driveways with 100 VTD or more. Curb return type driveways with 1s-foot radii
will be required for low-volume driveways with less than 100 WD.
Driveway Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance
problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. ln accordance with District policy,
7205.4.8, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-
feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway and install pavement tapers in
accordance with Table 2 under District Policy 7205.4.8.
Cross Access Easements/Shared Access Policy: District Policy 7202.4.1 states that cross
access utilizes a single vehicular connection that serves two or more adjoining lots or parcels
so that the driver does not need to re-enter the public street system.
Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing to utilize two of the existing driveways
located 300 and 500Jeet east of Linder Road on McMillan Road, and to close the existing
driveway located 745-feet east Linder Road.
Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal to continue to utilize the 30-
foot wide median restricted right-in/right-out driveway located approximately 300-feet east of
Linder Road does not meet District Driveway Location or Successive Driveway, policies which
requires righlin/right-out driveways on minor arterial roadways to be located a minimum of
330-feet from a signalized intersection and a minimum offset of 330-feet between driveways
and should not be approved, as proposed.
This driveway only offsets the full access driveway to the east by 200-feet, and driveway is
located on the departing leg of the intersection which can lead to rear end accidents as the
traveling public is accelerating through the intersection and others are slowing down to enter
the driveway creating an unsafe conditions. Staff recommends the driveway be closed with A/
vertical curb, gutter, and sidewalk to match the existing conditions on either side T
The application's proposal to continue to utilize the 35-foot wide full access driveway located
approximately soo-feet east of Linder Road does not meet District Driveway Location policy,
which requires full access driveways on minor arterials to be located a minimum of 660-feet
from a signalized intersection, however, staffas recommends val of this driveway
't0 McLinder
proposed, as it aligns with an existing driveway on the north side of McMillan Road across
from the site meeting the intent of the policy and was constructed as part of the intersection
project. The driveways should be paved back its full width at least 3o-feet into the site beyond
the edge of pavement.
The applicant's proposal to close the existing driveway located approximately 745-feet east of
Linder Road meet's District policy and should be approved, as proposed. The driveway
should be closed with sidewalk to match the improvements on either side.
6. Tree Planters
Tree Planter Policy: Tree Planter Policy: The District's Tree Planter Policy prohibits all trees in
planters less than Sjeet in width without the installation of root barriers. Class ll trees may be
allowed in planters with a minimum width of 8-feet, and Class I and Class lll trees may be allowed
in planters with a minimum width of 10{eet.
7. Landscaping
Landscaping Policy: A license agreement is required for all landscaping proposed within ACHD
righfof-way or easement areas. Trees shall be located no closer than 10-feet from all public
storm drain facilities. Landscaping should be designed to eliminate site obstructions in the vision
triangle at intersectrons. District Policy 5104.3.1 requires a 4o-foot vision triangle and a 3-foot
height restriction on all landscaping located at an uncontrolled intersection and a So-foot offset
from stop signs. Landscape plans are required with the submittal of civil plans and must meet all
District requirements prior to signature of the final plat and/or approval of the clvil plans.
8. Other Access
Linder Road is classified as a principal arterial and McMillan Road is classified as a minor arterial
roadway. Other than the access specifically approved with this application, direct lot access is
prohibited to these roadways and should be noted on the final plat.
D. Site Specific Gonditions of Approval
Construct a s-foot wide detached sidewalk on the south side of the Settlers Canal abutting the
site, as proposed. Provide a permanent righlof-way easement for the public
sidewalks placed
outside of the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between
the righlof-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be
located wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement.
Complete Ann Taylor as a 36-foot street section with curb, gutter, and S-foot wide attached
concrete sidewalk abutting the site, as proposed. Ann Taylor shall align centerline to centerline
with Ann Taylor on the west side of Linder Road across from the site.
Extend and complete Cobblefield Street as a 36Joot street section with curb, gutter, and S-foot
wide attached concrete sidewalk within SO-feet of right-of-way abutting the site, as proposed.
Close one extsting driveway on McMillan Road located 300 east of Linder Road with vertical curb,
gutter, and sidewalk to match the existing improvements.
Close one existing driveway on McMillan Road located 7 4s-feet east of Linder Road with sidewalk
to match the existing improvements.
Pave all other driveways their full width at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement.
Other than the access specifically approved with this application, direct lot access to Linder and
McMillan Roads is prohibited and shall be noted on the final plat.
Payment of impacts fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit.
1
2
^4
5
6
7
8
11 McLinder
3.
9
\-/
Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
E. Standard Conditions of Approval
l. All irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the ACHD righfof-way.
2. Private Utilities including sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within
the ACHD right-of-way.
3. ln accordance with District policy, 7203.3, the applicant may be required to update any
existing non-compliant pedestrian improvements abutting the site to meet current Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements The aoolicant's enoineer should provide
documentation of ADA compliance to District Development Review staff for review
4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged
during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at
387-6280 (with file number) for details.
5. A license agreement and compliance with the District's Tree Planter policy is required for all
landscaping proposed within ACHD righlof-way or easement areas.
6. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall
be borne by the developer.
7. lt is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way.
The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant.
The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1 -81 1-342-1585) at least two full business
days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD
Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are
compromised during any phase of construction.
8. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in
writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file
numbers) for details.
9. AII design and construction shall be in accordance with the ACHD Policy Manual, ISpWC
Standards and approved supplements, Construclion Services procedures and all applicable
ACHD Standards unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of
ldaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
10. Constructton, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable
requirements of ACHD prior to District approval for occupancy.
11. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in
writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an
authorrzed representative of ACHD. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain
written confirmation of any change from ACHD.
'12. lf the slte plan or use should change in the future, ACHD Planning Review will review the
site plan and may require additional improvements to the transportation system at that time.
Any change in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall
require the applicant to comply with ACHD Policy and Standard Conditions of Approval in
place at that time unless a waiver/variance of the requirements or other legal relief is
granted by the ACHD Commission.
F. Conclusions of Law
The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval
are satisfied.
1
12 Ir/cLinder
1
2
3
4
5
2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the
proposed development.
G. Attachments
Vicinity Map
Site Plan
Utility Coordinating Council
Development Process Checklist
Request for Reconsideration Guidelines
13 McLinder
VICINITY MAP
14 McLinder
1
I
:rl
.&.Lf r
. i.fr r
*t
s
r
n'::
.4
i
t)l
L
d
i:
SITE PLAN
PHEUMINARY PLATOF
McLINDER SUBDIVISION
LOCATED IN A POBTION OF THE NW 1I4 OF THE NYY 1iI OF
SECTION 36. T.4N. H.lW, BOISE MERIDIAN.
clTY oF MEnD|AN, ADA COTJNTY, tDAtn
AUGUST 19,2013
d
-lr--+t-t_t-t- F_
,
-i
g_ *f **
d
T
Ia
4
_t-.
I-
I
i
5l'!
tI'-
I
l'' #r
| ,'n*
EE ;
15 McLinder
,
I
t
Ada Gounty Utility Coordinating Council
Developer/Local lmprovement District
Right of Way lmprovements Guideline Request
Purpose: To develop the necessary avenue for proper notification to utilities of local highway
and road improvements, to help the utilities in budgeting and to clarify the already existing process.
1) Notification: Within five (5) working days upon notification of required right of way
improvements by Highway entities, developers shall provide written notification to the affected
utility owners and the Ada County Utility Coordinating Council (UCC). Notification shall include
but not be limited to, project limits, scope of roadway improvements/project, anticipated
construction dates, and any portions critical to the right of way improvements and coordination
of utilities.
2) Plan Review: The developer shall provide the highway entities and all utility owners with
preliminary project plans and schedule a plan review conference. Depending on the scale of
utility improvements, a plan review conference may not be necessary, as determined by the
utility owners. Conference notification shall also be sent to the UCC. During the review meeting
the developer shall notify utilities of the status of right of way/easement acquisition necessary
for their project. At the plan review conference each company shall have the right to appeal,
adjust and/or negotiate with the developer on its own behalf. Each utility shall provide the
developer with a letter of review indicating the costs and time required for relocation of its
facilities. Said letter of review is to be provided within thirty calendar days after the date of the
plan review conference.
3) Revisions: The developer is responsible to provide utilities with any revisions to preliminary
plans. Utilities may request an updated plan review meeting if revisions are made in the
preliminary plans which affect the utility relocation requirements. Utilities shall have thirty days
after receiving the revisions to review and comment thereon.
4) Final Notification: The developer will provide highway entities, utility owners and the UCC with
final notification of its intent to proceed with right of way improvements and include the
anticipated date work will commence. This notification shall indicate that the work to be
performed shall be pursuant to final approved plans by the highway entity. The developer shall
schedule a preconstruction meeting prior to right of way improvements. Utility relocation activity
shall be completed within the times established during the preconstruction meeting, unless
otherwise agreed upon.
Notification to the Ada County UCC can be sent ,o.. 50 S. Cole Rd. Boise 83707, or Visit
iducc, com for e-mail notification information.
16 McLinder
Development Process Checklist
XSubmit a development application to a City or to Ada County
XThe City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD
SThe ACHD Planning Review Section will receive the development application to review
EThe Planning Review Section will do g!9 of the followingi
SSend a "No Review" letter to the applicant statjng that there are no site specillc conditions of approval at
this time.
XWrite a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and
evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
Xwrite a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation syslem
and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to Districl Policy.
Items to be completed by Applicant:
EFor ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" letter:
. The applicant should submit one set of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development
Review Section for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements
required by ACHD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee assessment.)
. The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services
(ACHD) for ANY work in the right-of-
way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts.
EPay lmpact Fees prior lo issuance of building permit. lmpacl fees cannot be
paid prior to plan review approval.
DID YOU REMEMBER:
Con struction (Non-S ubdi vi sio ns)
I Driveway . Submit or a Property "Driveway Approach(Approach s) Request'form to ACHD Construclion (for approval by Development Services & Traffic
Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval.
E Working . Four in business the ACHD days Right-prior of-to way starting work have a bonded contractor submil a "Temporary Highway Use Permit
Application" to ACHD Construction -
a) b) Traffic An Erosion Control & Sediment Plan Control Permits Narrative along with:& Plat, done by a Certitled Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or
you
are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt.
Con structio n (S u bd ivision s)
E Sediment .Submittal At least & Erosion one week prior to setting up a Pre-Construction Meeting an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative &
Plan,
done by a Certified PIan Designer, must be tumed into ACHD Construction to be reviewed and approved by the ACHD
Stormwater Section.
I ldaho .Company Vic Power Steelman at ldaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being
scheduled.
fl Final Approval from Development Services is required prior to scheduling a Pre-Con.
't7 McLinder
Items Completed to Date:
1
Request for Appeal of Staff Decision
Appeal of Staff Decisioni The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant
of the final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS
Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts
presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and
capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual.
a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be
charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative
costs.
b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with
the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working
days from the date of the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of
appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name,
address and telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The
grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy
relevant
to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a written
argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice
of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection.
Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the
date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and
may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may
also consider and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the
reply and any modificatrons to the decision being appealed will be provided to the
appellant prior to the Commission hearing on the appeal.
d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of
the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular
meeting to be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant
of the ROWDS Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision
being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the
Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing.
Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm
or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the
decision being appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and
evidence presented at the hearing.
c
e
18 McLinder
Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action
Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action: A Commissioner, a member of ACHD
staff or any other person objecting to any final action taken by the Commission may request
reconsideration of that action, provided the request is not for a reconsideration of an action
previously requested to be reconsidered, an action whose provisions have been partly and
materially carried out, or an action that has created a contractual relationship with third parties.
a. Only a Commission member who voted with the prevailing srde can move for
reconsideration, but the motion may be seconded by any Commissioner and is voted on
by all Commissioners present.
lf a motion to reconsider is made and seconded it is subject to a motion to postpone to a
certain time.
c. The request for reconsideration must be supported by written documentatjon setting
forth new facts and information not presented at the earlier meeting, or a changed
situation that has developed since the taking of the earlier vote, or information
establishing an error of fact or law in the earlier action. The request may also be
supported by oral testimony at the meeting.
d. lf a motion to reconsider passes, the effect is the original matter is in the exact position it
occupied the moment before it was voted on originally. lt will normally be returned to
ACHD staff for further review. The Commission may set the date of the meeting at
which the matter is to be returned. The Commissron shall only take action on the
original matter at a meeting where the agenda notice so provides.
e. At the meeting where the original matter is again on the agenda for Commission action,
interested persons and ACHD staff may present such written and oral testimony as the
President of the Commission determines to be appropriate, and the Commission may
take any action the majority of the Commission deems advisable.
f. lf a motion to reconsider passes, the applicant may be charged a reasonable fee, to
cover administrative costs, as established by the Commission.
19 McLinder
1.
b. The request must be in writing and delivered to the Secretary of the Highway District no
later than 3:00 p.m. on the day prior to the Commlssion's next scheduled regular
meeting following the meeting at which the action to be reconsidered was taken. Upon
receipt of the request, the Secretary shall cause the same to be placed on the agenda
for that next scheduled regular Commission meeting.
v \r. \/ \,
NEW APPLICATION REPORT
I. PROJECT NAME
2. LOCATION -MCLIND
W
,6
3. LOCATION F
o7rA,rnt gr/zprc,< (c,of ctrL
r/ .t
ClK Lt.ud.<
+. IS A PRV REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT-YES-NO x
(IF YES PLEASE INDICATED LOCATION ON MAP) V
FIREFLOW REQUIREMENTS MET FOR RESIDENTI AL? I
5. IS A FLUSH LINE REQUIRED?
-YES-NO
X.
6. IS ANY PART OF THIS PROJECT IN THE FLOOD PLAIN
(YES)
-(ON
SITE / OFF
8. IS THIS PROJECT REQUIRED TO UPSIZE/ OVER DEPTH ON ANY
SEWER LINES N"
7. IS THIS PROJECT REQUIRED TO UPSIZE/OVER DEPTH ON ANY
WATER LINES /u6
(ON SITE / OFF SITE)
/q< ( \xI t... llr',I,t
WATER DATE SEWER DATE
(Norl
lz/
City of Meridian Development Review
Agency Comments Meeting
Date Date of List:
Project Name: rna/ in l-an
Planner:
Notes:
Fire
A B C D
1 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 €) 10 f1) t2 1,3, t4 15 r6 d7) 6-8,) 4g) 20
2L 22 Qz) 24 25 26 27 €s) dg)
30 31 )Z JJ 34 35 36 37 39 4o
4T 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49
Police
Notes:
A B C D E
7l 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
S Services
Notes:
ve:
A B C
1 2 3 97 98
Parks
Notes:
6 46 47 79 80 8l 82 83 84 85
Public Works
Notes:
1 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 t2 13 l4 t5 t6 t7 l8 t9 20
2t 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Rev.6/6/12
38
85 276.2
q,
V\/ is<inder-<d
12W 2003
(n
oN
/N
a
(,
N
a
a (so
N)
a
s
(,
(5r
O)
(s,
O)
a
a
a
A
(Jl
(o
A
-l )
N
oo
6
a os) (,
o
8S
, -\
i :i
I
. j.,l -
t-
I
____-__l_:
).- -,,
ie"ir 1---,,
,-tr
: lt'L
-'-' 'l"--'r-
or-?.|l -,'-
:'.i l ---t-i i r --'- 'ri tl il '
,r i_-.,' :
--T--*-i
Jlr
-*+
I
;85
,tt .rli
\---l---t,
'- 1, 'l
o5
(,
(, a
Sonya Watters
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Lance Warnick < lance@AspenEngineers.com >
Thursday, October 03, 2013 4:09 PM
Sonya Watters; rileyplanningservices@yahoo.com
David Scaggs; 'Tom Bevan'; I\4ary Murphy
RE: N4cLinder Sub/Sawtooth Village
Sonya,
As we discussed on the phone, we are agreement with the staff report with a couple of exceptions:
1. ltem 1.1.e on Page 19 of the staff report does not apply to this project because of the existing sidewalk (see
page 8 of the report). You indicated you will request this requirement be stricken.
2. ltem 1.2.10 on PaBe 20 recommends that bicycle parking be provided for each building or
pair of buildings. tn
looking over the site plan, I can see that addition bicycle parking locations could benefit the community. lsee
likely locations in at least seven different areas. However, we would like a little more flexibility in selecting the
locations. Perhaps requiring at bike parking in at least 7 locations is a good compromise. We can confirm this
locations with staff.
3. ltem 1.3.2 on Page 19 ofthe staff report does not apply to this project because ofthe existing sidewalk (see
page 8 of the report). You indicated youwill requestthis requirement be stricken.
It looks like otherwise we are in agreement with the recommendations of the staff report.
Thank you for your help.
Lance Warnick, P.E.
Principol Engineer
From: Sonya Watters Imailto:swatters@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 3:13 PM
To: rileyplanningservices@yahoo.com; lance@AspenEngineers.com
Subject: McLinder Sub/Sawtooth Village
lmportance: High
Would one of you please send me a written response to the staff report? (it can be short & sweet
- if you're in
agreement w/the staff report conditions or if you aren't, which one(s) you have an issue with).
Thx!
<foa4a. Wotlatu,
Associate City Planner, Planning Division
City of Meridian - Community Development Department
1
Aspen Engineers
2422 L2th Ave Rd #323 . Nampa, ldaho
83686
Phone (208) 466-8181 .
Cell (208) 989-4531 .
lance@Aspen Ensineers.com
Barbara Shiffer
From:
Sent:
Subject
Machelle Hill
Wednesday, September 11, 2013 1 1 :51 AM
FW. Ci$ of Meridian Dev App - Mclinder Subdivision AZ PP CUP
From: Machelle Hill
Sent: Wednesday, September 7t,207311:50 AM
Subject: City of Meridian Dev App - Mclinder Subdivision AZ PP CUP
a
IDAHO
City of Meridian
City Clerk's Office
33 E. Broadway Avenue
Meridian, ID 83642
Planning and Zaning Commission
D eve lopme n t App I ic atio n Trans mittal
To: Cifr Departments Comments due by: September 2612013
Transmittal Date: September ll,2013 File No.: AZ
13-010, PP 13-022 & CUP 13-010
Hearing Date: October 3,2013
Request: Public Hearing: Annexation and Zoning of 13 acres of land with the R-15 (6.43 acres)
and C-N (6.58 acres) zoning districts; Preliminary Plat approval consisting of 28
building lots (7 commercial & 2l multi-family residential) and 2 common/other lots
on 11.88 acres of land in the R-15 and C-N zoning districts AND Conditional Use
Permit approval for a multi-family development consisting of 84 dwelling units in the
R-15 zoning districts for Mclinder Subdivision and Sawtooth Village at Mclinder
Subdivision
By: TS LLC
Location of Property or Project 4650 N. Linder Road and1437 W. McMillan Road (SEC
of W. McMillan & N. Linder Roads)
The City of Meridian is requesting comments and recommendations on the application referenced above. To review
detailed information about the request, please click on the file number above to take you directly to the application.
We request that you submit your comments or recommendations by date specified above. When responding, please
reference the file number of the project. lf responding by email, please send comments to clerk@meridianciiv.orq.
For additional information associated with this application please contact City Clerk's Office at number below.
Thank you,
Machelle Hill
Deputy City Clerk
Meridian City Clerk's Office
33 E. Broadway Avenue
Meridian, lD 83642
(208) 888-4433
1
Sonya Watters
To:
Cc:
Sent:
Subject:
From: Justin Lucas
Wednesday, August 21,20L31:38 PM
Penelope Riley
Sonya Watters
RE: TIS for Sawtooth Village/McLinder Subdivision
Thanks Penelope. We will coordinate with ACHD to make sure that it is officially accepted. As stated in our phone
conversation, our goal is to have ACHD's recommendation from the full TIS review prior to the Planning and Zoning
Commission hearing for this project.
Justin Lucas, AICP
Planning Supervisor
City of Meridian
ilucas@meridia ncitv.org
208-884-5533
From : Penelope Riley [ma ilto : rileypla n n ingservices@ya hoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 2L,2013 1:33 PM
To: Justin Lucas
Cc: lance@AspenEngineers.com; Sonya Watters
Subject: Fw: TIS for Sawtooth Village/McLinder Subdivision
Justin,
Below is the response I received from Christy Little with ACHD confirming that the revised TIS was submitted
to the District.
Please let me know if you have any other questions.
Thank you.
Penelope
Riley Planning Services LLC
(208) e08-1609
ri I evo I a n n i n o se rvi ce s@ v a h oo. co m
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Christy Little <Clittle@achdidaho.org>
To: Penelope Riley <rileyplanningservices@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20,2013 4:04 PM
Subject: RE: TIS for Sawtooth Village/Mclinder Subdivision
We did receive it but it has not been reviewed.
Christy
7
_i
From: Penelope Riley
Sent: Tuesday, August 20,2013 2:49 PM
To: Christy Little
Subject: Fw: TIS for Sawtooth Village,Mclinder Subdivision
Christy,
Mindy is out on vacation so I though perhaps you would be able to confirm that the updated TIS for Sawtooth
Village was delivered to ACHD on Thursday last week.
Thank you.
Penelope
Riley Planning Services LLC
(208) 908-1609
r i I qtp I annings ervi c es @J,;
aho o. c o m
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Penelope Riley <rileyplanningservices@yahoo.com>
To: "mwallace@achdidaho.org" <mwallace@achdidaho.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20,2073 2:46PM
Subject: TIS for Sawtooth Village/Mclinder Subdivision
Mindy,
I understand that Dan Thompson delivered an updated TIS for our project at Linder and McMillan on Thursday
last week. Would you please conflnn for me?
Thank you.
Penelope
Riley Planning Services LLC
(208) 908-1609
r i I e.up I ann in g s erv i c e s
@)t a h o o. c o m
2
os
Os) (,
(o
5
O)
@(,
5
o) (o
-5-t
-.1
a a
-5{
(N,
a -s(s.r 1
-s-l
(n
-5{
..1
@
-s{
@
-.t
a 5
o)
((Jl ,
(/)
((, , a
N)
(o ,
I
@
=
\ o
--:.
8W
i : :t i, r--
f---a - - ---i ..
i
r-ir_i-+_rr'
i" -'1.:--\_
r--i ---r----?
: .
-J
(s,
-{
r) t_
j-,_, -.
€ @
I
,r
l
--\r-a_--r-
_--__l
-.---:
-.i]"-',
t,J
ti l,
I
I' rr!
.,. : .:
t:
-5.t
o
@
-5.t
No
A
o,
-.!
O)
Os) -{
o
j- )i
-'l -'
'--tJL
11 '- -"
.tj i,i,) i
208.1518 8S
@a
5s
i,
os, I
sA
a
(No
Os) (,
@
T
n (n (l J
,n 1n
(An
@(,
3
,l
8W 2 0
CN
*
a
a
85 234.6 a
I a
)
I
*
a
-1,
(5,t
@
-.1
,,.
' @,'
it.;
,r "'r " -i
i.--,'.f '-
1
t
a I a a a t
a
Better
than "E"
McMillan
Road
Minor Arterial 502
Better than
.D' 560
Better
than "D"
McLinder
C. Findinss for Consideration
71S-feet
a
lorow how many additional sets of plans are
required. All plans are required to be folglgg! ro I t/2" x I I "
size.
APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ALL APPUCABLE ITEMS ON THE CHECKUST ARE
SUBMITTED. THIS APPLICATION SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE (NOR WILL A PUBLIC
HEARING BE SET) UNTIL STAFF HAS RECEIVED ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION.
33 E. BroadwayAvenue, Suite 102 o Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 o Facsimile:
(208) 888-6854 o Website: www.meridianciry.org
?t1*t
a
a
ir:::
a
'L.l