AZ-12-012 Application ChecklistE IDIAN
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
City Council Members;
Keith Bird
Brad Hoaglun
Charles Rountree
IDAHO David Zaremba
October 25,2012
Kevin Mccarthy
Km Engineering, Llp
9233 West State Street
Boise,ID 83714
RE: Tradewinds Subdivision (PP-1 2-015)
Dear Mr. Mccarthy
This letter is to inform you that the subject application is scheduled to be heard by the City of
Meridian's Planning & Zoning Commission on November 15, 2012. The hearing will be held at
the Meridian City Hall, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, in the City Council chambers at 7:00 p.m.
In accord with UDC 11-5A-5D, a public hearing notice is required to be posted on the property
under consideration on or before November 5,2072, not less than ten (10) days prior to the
pubiic hearing. Proof of posting consisting of a notarized statement and a photograph of the
posting is required to be submiued to the City no later than seven (7) days prior to the hearing
attesting to where and when the sign(s) were posted. If you do not submit the certificate by such
date, the hearing will be continued. Please refer to Unified Development Code 1 1-5A-5D for the
appropriate posting requirements.
Ifyou have any questions please feel free to contact our office at 884-5533.
Thank you for contributing to the success of Meridian. Please help us serve you better in the
future. Visit our web-site at www.rneridianci4r.org departments/planntng/comment card to fiIl
out a customer survey and give us feedback on how we are doing.
Sincerely,
@o,io,*.Q/lgfd.
Barbara Shiffer
Administrative Assistant II
Community Development
884-5533
Community Development Department 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, lD 83642
Phone208-884-5533 Fax208-BB8-6854 www.meridiancity.org
d{rry Planning Department
PRELIMINARY PLAT r Application Checklist
Proiectname: Tradewinds Subdivision File+: lF-llO
Applicant/agent: SDN, LLC / I(M Engineering, LLP
All applications are required to contain one copy of the following:
Note: Only one copy of the above items need be submitted when submitting multiple applications
Additional Requirements for Preliminary Plat Applications:
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 210 o Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 o Facsimile:
(208) 888-6854 o Website: www'meridiancity.org
(Rev.6/02201 1)
Applicant
({)
Description
Staff
({)
x Completed & signed Commission & Council Review Application
x Narrative fully describing the proposed project
x Irgal description of the subject property
(tot, Block, and Subdivision name if located in a recorded
subdivision OR a metes and bounds legal description of the proag4t if not in a subdivision.)
x Recorded warranty deed for the sub.lect property
x Affidavit of Legal Interest signed & notarized by the
property owner (If owner is a colporation,
submit a copy of the Anicles of Incorporation or other evidence to show that the person signing is an authorized agent.) l./
x Scaled vicinity map showing the location oj t L/
x Pre-application meeting notes (All applications that require a public hearing are required to conduct a pre-
aoolication meeting with the Planning Depanment.)
x Neighborhood meeting sign-in sheet
(Applicants are required to hold a neighborhood meeting to provide
an opportunity for public review of the proposed project prior to the submittal of
an application.)
x CommitmentofPropertyPostingformsignedbythe
x Fee
(Please call Planning Department to calculate correct fee.
Applications with
incorrect fees will not be accepted.)
Applicant
({)
Description
Staff
({)
x
Include the following additional information in the project narrative:
the ordinance describing the particular provision, the variance requested, and the
reason thereof
development. (e.g., larger rear setback to buffer adjoining propeiqgq.g!9.)
x Approval of the proposed subdivision name from the Ada County Surveyor's
office
x Preliminary
Plat-* I copy (folded to 8 /2" x t l" size)
The following items must be included on the preliminary plat: l,/
x a Proposed subdivision name (Do not use numbers in preliminary plat names.)
x a Drafting date
x a Section location and county (situate statement)
x a North arrow
x a Scale (not less than 1"=100')
x a Name, address and phone number ofowner(s), applicant, and engineer, surveyor or
planner who prepared the preliminary plat
n/a a Proposed site(s) for parks, playgrounds, schools, churches or other public uses
x a Streets, street names, rights-of-way and roadway widths, including adjoining streets
or roadways (details on plan)
x I Proposed and existing lot lines and blocks showing scaled dimensions and numbers
of each
x a Legend of symbols
n/a a Minimum residential house size (for R-2 and R-4 ZSqgqq!y)
x
a Contour lines shown at 5' intervals where land slope is greater than l07o and at 2'
intervals where land slope is lUVo or less, referenced to an established benchmark,
including location and elevation
x
a Any proposed or existing utilities including, but not limited to, storm and sanitary
sewers, irrigation laterals, ditches, drainage, bridges, culverts, water mains, fire
hydrants, streetlights, pressurized irrigation and their respective profiles.
x a Any dedications to the public and easements together with a statement of location,
dimensions and purposes ofsuch
x a Master street drainage plan, including method of disposal
n/a a Floodplain boundary as determined by FEMA or measures to amend this boundary
x a Stub streets to provide access to adiacent undeveloped land or existing roadways
x a Block faces not more than seven hundred fifty feet (750') in length without an
intersecting, street or alley (residential districts only)
'!a a Block lengths not greater than thirteen hundred feet ( I ,300') without a pedestrian
connection (residential districts only)
n/a a Cul-de-sac lengths not in excess of450'
x Reduction of the preliminary plat (8 th"
x 11")
x
Landscape plan -
*1 copy (folded to
8 Vz" x I l" size)
Planmust have ascale no smallerthan 1" = 50'(1"
= 20'is preferred) and beona standarddrawing
sheet, not to exceed 36" x 48" (24" x 36" is preferred). A plan which cannot be dra|n in its entirery
on a single sheet must be drawn with appropriate match lines on fwo or more sheets.
The following items must be included on the landscape plan:
x a Date, scale, north arrow, and pro.ject name
x Names, addresses, and telephone numbers ofthe developer and the person and/or
firm preparing the plan
x a Existing natural features such as canals, creeks, drains, ponds, wetlands,
floodplains, high groundwater areas, and rock outcroppings.
x
Location, size, and species of all existing trees on site with trunks 4 inches or
greater in diameter, measured 6 inches above the ground. Indicate whether the tree
will be retained or removed. v
x a A statement of how existing healthy trees proposed to be retained will be protected
from damage during construction
x
a Existing buildings, structures, planting areas, light poles, power poles, walls,
fences, berms, parking and loading areas, vehicular drives, trash areas, sidewalks,
pathways, stormwater detention areas, signs, street furniture, and other man-made
elements.
a Existing and proposed contours for all areas steeper than20Vo slope. Berms shall
be shown with one-foot contours.
x a Sight Triansles as defined in 1 l-3A-5 ofthis ordinance.
x a Proposed landscaping )t
x a Proposed screening structures
x
Calculations of project components to demonstrate compliance with the
requirements of this ordinance, including:
> Width of street buffers, lineal feet of street frontage, and number of street trees
Supplementary information at the discretion of the Director or City Engineer may be required to sfficiently detail
the proposed development within any special development area, including but not limited to hillside, planned unit
development, floodplain, cemetery, manufactured home parks, and/or hazardous or unique areas of development.
*Once an application is accepted, staffwill contact you to let you
know how many additional copies of plans are
required. All plans are required to be folded to 8 /2" x I l " size.
APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ALL APPUCABLE ITEMS ON THE CHECKLIST ARE
SUBMITTED, THIS APPUCATION SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE (NOR WILL A PUBLIC
HEARING BE SET) UNTIL STAFF HAS RECEIVED ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION.
x ) Mitigation for removal of existing trees
x Reduction of the landscape plan (8 Vz" x 1 1")
x Site report of the highest seasonal
groundwater elevation prepared by a registered soils
scientist ,,/
x
Written confirmation that a traffic impact study is not required and/or has been submitted for
review to ACHD. Please contact Mindy Wallace at 387-6178 or Christy Little at 387-6144
for more information.
x Submit two
(2) sets of conceptual engineering plans, including respective profiles to Public
x Works Conceptual for approval elevations (208-of 898-proposed 5500). structures, including building materials 4
Electronic Submittal (Separate disks required)
x
(1) Disk with electronic version of the conceptual engineering plans in a format
that complies with the Specihcations for Project Drawings found at:
http://www.meridiancity.ors/public works/autocad standards/index.asp
,./
x
( 1 ) Electronic version of the preliminary plat & landscape plan in pdf format submitted
on a disk with the hles named with project name & plan type (i.e. preliminary plat,
landscape plan, etc.). We encourage you to also submit at least one color version for
presentation pumoses.
t/
t
IAN Planning Department
IDAHO ANNEXATIONiREZONE r Application Checklist
Proiectname: Tradewinds Subdivision File #: A? | r otl
Applicant/asent: SDN, LLC / KM Engineering, LLP
Application is required to contain one copy of the following:
Applicant
(J)
Description
Sraff
(J)
x Completed & signed Commission & Council Review Application t/-
x Narrative fully describing the proposed project
x
Legal description of the property to be annexed and/or rezoned
o Include a metes & bounds description to the section line of all adjacent roadways, stamped & signed by a
registered professional land surveyor, with a calculated closure sheet.
r Scaled exhibit map showing the boundaries of the legal description in compliance w/ the requirements of the
Idaho State Tax Commission Property Tax Administrative Rules IDAPA 35.01.03.225.01.h.
o Ifrequesting more than one zoning designation, include a legal description for each zone along with an overall
annexation/rezone boundary description. Also include the boundaries of each different zone on the map.
4Note: Wen also submitting a Preliminary Plat application, a separate legal description is required
for the
boundaies of the plat, excluding property
to the section line as required for annexations/relones.
x Recorded warranty deed for the subject property
x Affidavit of Legal
Interest signed & notarized by the property owner (If owner is a corporation,
submit a copy of the Articles of Incorporation or other evidence to show that the person signing is an authorized agent.)
x Scaled vicinity map showing the location of the subiect property
x Provide concept plan (Roads, access points, parking, general layout of buildings and building elevations.)
x Pre-application meeting notes
(All applications that require a public hearing are required to conduct a pre-
application meeting with the Planning Department.) ,,/
x Neighborhood meeting sign-in sheet (Applicants are required to hold a neighborhood meeting to provide
an oppomrnity for public review of the proposed project prior to the submittal of an application.)
x Commitment of Property Posting form signed by the applicant/agent
x Fee
(Please call Planning Department to calculate correct fee. Applications with
incorrect fees will not be accepted.)
Note: Only one copy of the above items need be submitted when submitting multiple applications
Additional Requirements for Annexation/Rezone Applications:
APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ALL APPLICABLE ITEMS ON THE CHECKLIST ARE
SUBMITTED.
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 210 o Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 o Facsimile:
(208) 888-6854 . Website: www.meridiancity.org
(Rev. I 1/4/08)
Applicant
({)
Description
Staff
({)
n/a
If this application is not accompanied by a plat, conditional use permit, or planned unit
development application, submit a conceptual development plan and elevations for the
property (also submit an electronic version of the plan(s) in pdf format on a disk with the file named
with proiect name & plan type
[i.e. conceptual development plan, elevationsl).
P/n
t
t
,*tr l@Departmentrry, lrya Deve lopment Seryices
a
NI it*-aa"t
ProjecUFile:
Lead Agency:
Site address:
Commission
Hearing:
Commission
Approval:
Staff Approval
Applicant:
Representative: KM Engineering, LLP
Kevin McCarthy, PE
9233 W State Street
Boise, lD 83714
Staff Contact: Stacey Yarrington
Phone: 387-6171
E-mail: svarrinoton@achdidaho.orq
Tech Review: November 15,2012
A. Findinqs of Fact
Tradewi nds/MPP-1 2-0 1 SIMAZ-I 2-01 2
This is an Annexation, Zoning and Preliminary Plat application to annex into Meridian
City with an R-8 zone, consisting of 39 building lots and 3 common/other lots on
10.42 acres. The site is located on the southeast corner of E Victory Road and S
Locust Grove Road, Meridian, ldaho.
Meridian
SE Corner E Victory Road & S Locust Grove Road
December 12,2012
September XX,2012
SDN, LLC - Don Newell
PO Box 1939
Eagle, lD 83616
,l
2.
Description of Application: This application is for Annexation into Meridian City with Zoning to
an R-8, medium density zone and a Preliminary Plat consisting of 39 building lots and 3
common/other lots. The site is 10.42 acres, located on the southeast corner of E Victory Road
and S Locust Grove Road, fvleridian, ldaho.
Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area:
Direction Land Use Zoning
North Sageland Subdivision - Medium Density Residential
R-8
South Rural-urban Transition (Ada County) RUT
East Rural-urban Transition (Ada County) RUT
West Rural-urban Transition (Ada County) RUT
1 DRAFTTradewinds/MPP-12-01S/MAZ-'t2-012
E
3. Site History: ACHD has not previously reviewed this site for a development application.
4. lmpact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any
building permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in
effect at that time.
5 Capital lmprovements Plan (ClP)/Five Year Work Plan (FYWP):
Victory Road Bridge #296 is scheduled in the Five Year Work Plan to be widened and is
currently an unfunded prorect.
Victory Road is listed in the Capital lmprovements Plan to be widened to 3-lanes from Locust
Grove Road to Eagle Road between 2017 and 2021 .
Locust Grove Road is listed in the Capital lmprovements Plan to be widened to 3-lanes from
Amity Road to Victory Road between 2o17and 2021.
The intersection of Victory Road and Locust Grove Road is listed in the Capital lmprovements
Plan to be widened to a dual lane roundabout with a southbound right turn bypass lane between
2017 and 2021
BConsideration Traffic Findinqs for
't. Trip Generation (if TIS not required): This development is estimated to generate 373 additional
vehicle trips per day (0 existing); 39 additional vehicle trips per hour in the PM
peak hour (0
existing), based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8th edition.
2. Condition of Area Roadways
Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour (VPH)
Roadway
PM Peak
Hour
Traffic Count
PM Peak
Hour Level
of Service
Existing
Plus
Proiect
Victory Road 432-feet lvlinor Arterial 403
Better than
"D"
Locust Grove
Road
792leel [,4inor Arterial 675
Better than
tr
Better
than .F"
* Acceptable level of service for a two-lane minor arterial is "D"
(550 VPH).
3. Average Daily Traffic Count (VDT)
Average daily traftic counts are based on ACHD'9 most cunent traffic counts
The average daily traffic count for Victory Road west of Eagle Road was 7,370 on
8/19/09.
The average daily traffic count for Locust Grove Road south of Overland Road was
11,516 on 8/19/09.
G. Findin s for Consideration
Plans and Studies
The South Meridian Transportation Plan (SMTP) is a long range planning tool used to identify
future roadway, intersection, and corridor needs in the South Meridian Area. Providing a
framework for future roadway improvements based on the land use designations. The plan
was created in collaboration with the City of Meridian and was adopted by the ACHD
Commission in September of 2009.
1
2 DRAFTTradewinds/MPP-12-015lMAZ-12-012
Frontage Functional
Classification
A capacity analysis was conducted to determine the arterial roadway needs in the year 2030.
LOS E was used as the threshold for identifying needed improvements along principal arterial
roadways while LOS D was used as the threshold for minor artenals, using the standards in
ACHD's adopted ClP. COMPASS' peak hour forecasts were used as the basis for
determining needs. Based on the travel demand, all principal artenals require s-lanes. All
minor arterials require 3-lanes with the exception of Black Cat Road, Linder Road, and
portions of Victory Road and Locust Grove Road. They either have demands that require 5-
lane roadways or are being preserved for s-lanes.
2. Victory Road
a. Existing Conditions: Victory Road is improved with 2-travel lanes, 26-feet of pavement and
no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. There is 60-feet of right-of-way for Victory Road
(2sjeet from centerline). The Victory Road/Locust Grove Road intersection was improved
with a signal and left hand turn lanes in 2012. There is an existing drainage ditch adjacent to
Victory Road abutting the site.
b. Policy:
Arterial Roadway Policy: Dishict Policy 7205.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for
improving all street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is taken
to all of the adjacent streets.
Master Street Map and Typology Policy: District Policy 7205.5 states that the design of
improvements for arterials shall be in accordance with District standards, including the l\/aster
Street Map and Livable Streets Design Guide. The developer or engineer should contact the
District before starting any design.
Street Section and Right-of-Way Width Policy: District Policies 7205.2.1 & 7205.5.2 state
that the standard s-lane street section shall be 72-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) within
96-feet of rightof-way. This width typically accommodates two travel lanes in each direction, a
continuous center left{urn lane, and bike lanes on a minor arterial and a safety shoulder on a
principal arterial.
Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7205.5.7 requires a concrete sidewalks at least s-feet wide to
be constructed on both sides of all arterial streets. A parkway strip at least 6-feet wide
between the back-of-curb and street edge of the sidewalk is required to provide increased
safety and protection of pedestrians. Consult the District's planter width
policy if trees are to
be placed within the parkway strip. Sidewalks constructed next to the back-of-curb shall be a
minimum of 7-feet wide.
Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway.
lileandering sidewalks are discouraged.
A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public
sidewalks are placed outside of
the dedicated righlof-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right-
of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located
wholly within the public rightof-way or wholly within an easement.).
Frontage lmprovements Policy: District Policy 7205.2.1 states that the developer shall
widen the pavement to a minimum of 17-feet from centerline plus a 3-foot wide gravel
shoulder adjacent to the entire site. Curb, gutter and additional pavement widening may be
required (See Section 7205.5.5).
ACHD Master Street Map: ACHD Policy Section 31 1 1 .1 requires the lvlaster Street lvlap
([ISM) guide the rightof-way acquisition, arterial street requirements, and specific roadway
features required through development. This segment of Victory Road is designated in the
MSM as a Residential Arterial with s-lanes and on-street bike lanes, a 7'l-foot street section
within 97-feet of right-of-way.
3 DRAFT Tradewinds/IMPP-12-OlSllVtAZ-12-012
c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant is proposing to dedicate 46-feet of right.of-way at the
site's east property line widening to ggjeet
at the Victory/Locust Grove intersection. This
includes right-of-way for the future roundabout. The applicant is not proposing any other
improvements to Victory Road.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District Right-Of-Way
Policy. The applicant's proposal does not meet District Sidewalk and Frontage lmprovements
Policy, which requires the construction of a sidewalk along arterial streets. Staff is
recommending a modiflcation of policy to require the applicant to provide 4 feet of additional
pavement along Victory Road abutting the sile to total 17 feet of pavement from centerline, in
lieu of sidewalk construction. The applicant should also provide a 3-foot wide gravel shoulder.
Staffs recommendation is due to the proposed roundabout at the intersection of Victory Road
and Locust Grove Road. Given the design constraints of the proposed roundabout, it is
difficult to determrne the appropriate location for the sidewalk. The requirement for pavement
widening will provide additional room for cyclists and pedestrians, while not requiring the
applicant to construct a sidewalk that will most likely be removed and reconstructed, as part of
ACHD's future roundabout project.
Staff is also recommending that the applicant move the existing drainage ditch out of existing
and proposed ACHD right-of-way.
3. Locust Grove Road
a. Existing Conditions: Locust Grove Road is improved with 2-travel lanes, 26-feet of
pavement, and no curb, gutter or sidewalk abuttjng the sile. There is so-feet of right-of-way
for Locust Grove Road (2s-feet from centerline). The Victory Road/Locust Grove Road
intersection was improved with a signal and left hand turn lanes in 2012.
b. Policy:
Arterial Roadway Policy: District Policy 7205.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for
improving all street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is taken
to all of the adjacent streets.
Master Street Map and Typology Policy: District Policy 7205.5 states that the design of
improvements for arterials shall be in accordance with District standards, including the Master
Street Map and Livable Streets Design Guide. The developer or engineer should contact the
District before starting any design.
Street Section and Right-of-Way Width Policy: District Policies 7205.2.1 & 7205.5.2 state
that the standard s-lane street section shall be 72-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) within
96-feet of right-of-way. This width typically accommodates two travel lanes in each direction, a
continuous center left{urn lane, and bike lanes on a minor arterial and a safety shoulder on a
principal arterial.
Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7205.5.7 requires a concrete sidewalks at least s-feet wide to
be constructed on both sides of all arterial streets. A parkway strip at least 6-feet wide
between the back-of-curb and street edge of the sidewalk is required to provide increased
safety and protection of pedestrians. Consult the District's planter width
policy if trees are to
be placed within the parkway strip. Sidewalks constructed next to the back-of-curb shall be a
minimum of 7-feet wide.
Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway.
lvleandering sidewalks are discouraged.
A permanent righlof-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are
placed outside of
the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right-
of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located
wholly within the public righlof-way or wholly within an easement.).
4 DRAFTTradewinds/lVlPP-12-015lMaZ-12-012
Frontage lmprovements Policy: District Policy 7205.2.1 states that the developer shall
widen the pavement to a minimum of 17-feet from centerline plus a 3-foot wide gravel
shoulder adjacent to the entire site. Curb, gutter and additional pavement widening may be
required (See Section 7205.5.5).
ACHD Master Street Map: ACHD Policy Section 3111.1 requires the Master Street lvlap
(MSM) guide the right-of-way acquisition, arterial street requirements, and specific roadway
features required through development. This segment of Locust Grove Road is designated in
the MSM as a Residential Arterial with s-lanes and on-street bike lanes, a 71-foot street
section within g7-feet of right-of-way.
c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant is proposing to dedicate 46jeet of right-of-way starting at
the site's south property line widening to gg-feet
at the Victory/Locust Grove intersection.
This includes right-of-way for the future roundabout. The applicant is not proposing any other
improvements to Locust Grove Road.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District RighfOf-Way
Policy. The applicant's proposal does not meet District Sidewalk and Frontage lmprovements
Policy, which requires the construction of a sidewalk along arterial streets. Staff is
recommending a modification of policy to require the applicant to provide 4 feet of additional
pavement along Locust Grove Road abutting the site to total 17 feet of pavement from
centerline, in lieu of sidewalk construction. The applicant should also provide a 3joot wide
gravel shoulder.
Staffs recommendation is due to the proposed roundabout at the intersection of Victory Road
and Locust Grove Road. Given the design constraints of the proposed roundabout, it ts
difficult to determine the appropriate location for the sidewalk. The requirement for pavement
widening will provide additional room for cyclists and pedestrians, while not requiring the
applicant to construct a sidewalk that will most likely be removed and reconstructed, as part of
ACHD's future roundabout project.
4. lnternal Streets
a. Existing Conditions: There are no existing public roadways within this site.
b. Policy:
Local Roadway Policy: District Policy 7207.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for
improvtng all local street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is
taken to all of the adjacent streets.
Street Section and Right-of-Way Policy: District Policy 7207.5 states that right-of-way
widths for all local streets shall generally not be less than so-feet wide and that the standard
street section shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). The District will consider the
utilization of a street width less than 36-feet with written fire department approval.
Standard Urban Local Street-36-foot to 33-foot Street Section and Right-of-way Policy:
District Policy 7207 .5.2 states that the standard street section shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to
back-of-curb) for developments with any buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size. This
street section shall include curb, gutter, and minimum s-foot concrete sidewalks on both sides
and shall typically be within so-feet of right-of-way.
The District will also consider the utilization of a street width less than 36-feet with written fire
department approval. Most often this width is a 33-foot street section (back-of-curb to back-
of-curb) for developments with any buildable lot that is /ess lhan 1 acre in size.
Continuation of Streets Policy: District Policy 7207.2.4 states that an existing street, or a
street in an approved preliminary plat, which ends at a boundary of a proposed development
shall be extended in that development. The e)dension shall include provisions for continuation
of storm drainage facilities. Benefits of connectivity include but are not limited to the following:
5 DRAFTTradewindsiMPP-12-015|MAZ-12-012
. Reduces vehicle miles traveled.
. lncreases pedestrian and bicycle connectivity.
. lncreases access for emergency services.
. Reduces need for additional access points to the arterial street system
. Promotes the efficient delivery of services including trash, mail and deliveries.
o Promotes appropriate intra-neighborhood traffic circulation to schools, parks,
neighborhood commercial centers, transit stops, etc.
. Promotes orderly development.
Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7207.5.7 states that five-foot wide concrete stdewalk is
required on both sides of all local street, except those in rural developments with net densities
of one dwelling unit per 1.0 acre or less, or in hillside conditions where there is no direct lot
frontage, in which case a sidewalk shall be constructed along one side of the street. Some
local jurisdictions may require wider sidewalks.
The sidewalk may be placed next to the back-of-curb. Where feasible, a parkway strip at least
8-feet wide between the back-of-curb and the street edge of the sidewalk is recommended to
provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians
and to allow for the planting of trees in
accordance with the District's Tree Planting Policy. If no trees are to be planted in the
parkway strip, the applicant may submit a request to the District, with iustification, to reduce
the width of the parkway strip.
Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway.
Meandering sidewalks are discouraged.
A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public
sidewalks are placed outside of
the dedicated rightof-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right-
of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge ofthe sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located
wholly within the public righlof-way or wholly within an easement.).
c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing to construct the internal streets as 33-foot
street sections (back of curb to back of curb) with rolled curb, gutter, 8-foot planter strip and 5-
foot detached sidewalks, within 5o-feet of righlof-way.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District
policy, and
should be approved, as proposed. The applicant should be required to provide written Fire
Department approval for use of a street section less than 36-feet in width.
5. Roadway Offsets
a. Existing Conditions: There are no existing roadway offsets internal to the site.
b. Policy:
Local Street lntersection Spacing on Minor Arterials: District policy 7205.4.3 states that
new local streets should not typically intersect arterials. Local streets should typically intersect
collectors. lf it is necessary, as determined by ACHD, for a local street to intersect an arterial,
the minimum allowable offset shall be 660-feet as measured from all other existing roadways
as identified in Table'la (7205.4.6).
c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing a roadway offset 767-feet (measured
centerline-to-centerline) onto Locust Grove Road abutting the site.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District Policy. Staff
recommends approval of the applicant's proposal as there is no frontage on a collector street.
6. Stub Streets
a, Existing Conditions: There are no stub streets to or from the site.
5 DRAFTTradewinds/lr/PP-12-01'|MAZ-12-012
b. Policy:
Stub Street Policy: District policy 7207.2.4 (local) states that stub streets will be required to
provide circulation or to provide access to adjoining properties. Stub streets will conform with
the requirements described in Section 7207.2.5.4 (local), except a temporary cul-de-sac will
not be requrred if the stub street has a length no greater than 150-feet. A sign shall be
installed at the terminus of the stub street stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED lN
THE FUTURE.'
ln addition, stub streets must meet the following conditions:
o A stub street shall be designed to slope towards the nearest street intersectron within the
proposed development and drain surface water towards that intersection; unless an
alternative storm drain system is approved by the District.
. The District may require appropriate covenants guaranteeing that the stub street will
remain free of obstructions.
c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant is proposing to construct one stub street to the east,
Fathom Drive, located 225-feet south of Victory Road (measured centerline-to-centerline).
Fathom Drive is proposed to be, '1so-feet
long.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District Policy, and
should be approved, as proposed. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the
terminus of the stub street stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED lN THE FUTURE."
7. Tree Planters
Tree Planter Policy: Tree Planter Policy: The District's Tree Planter Policy prohibits all trees in
planters less than 8-feet in width without the installation of root barriers. Class ll trees may be
allowed in planters with a minimum width of 8-feet, and Class I and Class lll trees may be allowed
in planters with a minimum width of 1O-feet.
8. Landscaping
Landscaping Policy: A license agreement is required for all landscaprng proposed within ACHD
right-of-way or easement areas. Trees shall be located no closer than 1o-feet from all public
storm drain facilities. Landscaping should be designed to eliminate site obstructions in the vision
triangle at intersections. District Policy 5104.3.1 requires a 4o-foot vision triangle and a 3-foot
height restriction on all landscaping located at an uncontrolled intersectron and a so-foot offset
from stop signs. Landscape plans are required with the submittal of civil plans and must meet all
District requirements prior to signature of the final plat and/or approval of the civil plans.
9. Other Access
Victory Road and Locust Grove Road are classified as minor arterials roadways. Other than the
access specifically approved with this application, direct lot access is prohibited to these
roadways and should be noted on the final plat.
D. Site Specific Conditions of Approval.
Dedicate 46-feet of righfof-way at the site's east property line widening to
gg-feet at the
Victory/Locust Grove intersection. The righlof-way purchase and sale agreement and deed must
be completed and signed by the applicant prior to scheduling the final plat for signature by the
ACHD Commission or prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits),
whichever
occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of
all requested material. The District will purchase the righlof-way which is in addition to existing
right-of-way from available Corridor Preservation Funds.
1
7 DRAFTTradewinds/MPP-12-01'|MAZ-12-012
2. Provide 4-feet of additional pavement along Victory Road abutting the site to total 17 feet of
pavement from centerline and a 3-foot wide gravel shoulder adjacent to the entire site on Victory
Road.
Move the existing drainage ditch out of existing and proposed ACHD right-of-way.
Dedicate 46-feet of right-of-way at the site's south property line widening to gg-feet
at the
Victory/Locust Grove intersection. The right-of-way purchase and sale agreement and deed must
be completed and signed by the applicant prior to scheduling the final plat for signature by the
ACHD Commission or prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever
occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of
all requested material. The District will purchase the right-of-way which is in addition to existing
right-of-way from available Corridor Preservation Funds.
Provide 4-feet of additional pavement along Locust Grove Road abutting the site to total 17 feet of
pavement from centerline and a 3-foot wide gravel shoulder adjacent to the entire site on Locust
Grove Road.
Construct the internal streets as 33-foot street sections (back of curb to back of curb) with rolled
curb, gutter, 8-foot planter strip and s-foot detached sidewalks, within so-feet of right-of-way.
Provide written Fire Department approval for use of a street section less than 36-feet in width.
lnstall a sign at the terminus of the stub street stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED lN
THE FUTURE.'
Payment of impacts fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit.
Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
Standard Conditions of Approval
Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the ACHD right-of-way.
Private sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within the ACHD right-of-
way.
ln accordance with District policy, 7203.3, the applicant may be required to update any
existing non-compliant pedestrian improvements abutting the site to meet current Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements The aoplicant's enoineer should provide
documentation of ADA compliance to District Development Review staff for revtew
4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged
during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at
387-6280 (with file number) for details.
5. A license agreement and compliance with the District's Tree Planter policy is required for all
landscaping proposed within ACHD righlof-way or easement areas.
6. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall
be borne by the developer.
7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way.
The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant.
The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-81 1-342-1585) at least two full business
days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD
Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are
compromised during any phase of construction.
3.
4.
5
6
7
I
9
E
10.
1
2
3
8 DRAFTTradewinds/MPP-'12-O15|MAZ-12-012
1
8. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved
in
writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file
numbers) for details.
9. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the ACHD Policy Manual, ISPWC
Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable
ACHD Standards unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of
ldaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
10. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable
requirements of ACHD prior to District approval for occupancy.
11. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in
writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an
authorized representative of ACHD. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain
written confirmation of any change from ACHD.
'12. lf the site plan or use should change in the future, ACHD Planning Review will review the
site plan and may require additional improvements to the transportation system at that time.
Any change in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall
require the applicant to comply with ACHD Policy and Standard Conditions of Approval In
place at that time unless a waiver/variance of the requirements or other legal relief is
granted by the ACHD Commission.
F, Conclusaons of Law
The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval
are satisfied.
ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the
proposed development.
Attachments
Vicinity Map
Site Plan
Utility Coordinating Council
Development Process Checklist
Request for Reconsideration Gurdelines
2
G
1
2
3
4
5
9 DRAFTTradewinds/MPP-12-O15|MAZ-12-012
VICINITY MAP
10 DRAFTTradewinds/MPP-12-015lMM-12-012
I
:{
i%
'ti.:.-.
et
ffii
,
V
SITE PLAN
I
TE
FIE
9:E
5iE
gEE
6f;=
r9 !6
1 ffii'iitD
I
I
I
Ecr
Eii nl
3
iEE iII a:I:I t
tl
+t
+tr
ilt
i!!
!:!
':l:t l!
!i"
il!g
I
I
I
lit :TI
EIE
s!i
lir r:t
!tl
,[{
("-
!i$l'ffiti$p
ilr'Fffii'Fl
T -t
ltfiil rrlitl
----'1----\. -- --r-
3
Pr
.3;
-E=E
HcEH
s-:= E
trTmE
'==
*vt
Hs z
liiF
iill
fi!l
ilfl
,i!l
t{fifftTIfi !.tl ll
i io
I
I
Ada County Utility Coordinating Council
Developer/Local lm provement District
Right of Way lmprovements Guideline Request
Purpose: To develop the necessary avenue for proper notification to utilities of local highway
and road improvements, to help the utilities in budgeting and to clarify the already existing process.
1) Notification: Within five (5) working days upon notification of required right of way
improvements by Highway entities, developers shall provide written notification to the affected
utility owners and the Ada County Utility Coordinating Council (UCC). Notification shall include
but not be limited to, project limits, scope of roadway improvements/project, anticipated
construction dates, and any portions critical to the right of way improvements and coordination
of utilities.
2) Plan Review: The developer shall provide the highway entities and all utility owners with
preliminary project plans and schedule a plan review conference. Depending on the scale of
utility improvements, a plan review conference may not be necessary, as determined by the
utility owners. Conference notification shall also be sent to the UCC. During the review meeting
the developer shall notify utilities of the status of right of way/easement acquisition necessary
for their project. At the plan review conference each company shall have the right to appeal,
adjust and/or negotiate with the developer on its own behalf. Each utility shall provide the
developer with a letter of review indicating the costs and time required for relocation of its
facilities. Said letter of review is to be provided within thirty calendar days after the date of the
plan review conference.
4) Final Notification: The developer will provide highway entities, utility owners and the UCC with
final notification of its intent to proceed with right of way improvements and include the
anticipated date work will commence. This notification shall indicate that the work to be
performed shall be pursuant to final approved plans by the highway entity. The developer shall
schedule a preconstruction meeting prior to right of way improvements. Utility relocation
activity
shall be completed within the times established during the preconstruction meeting, unless
otherwise agreed upon.
Notification to the Ada County UCC can be sent fo: 50 S. Cole Rd. Boise 83707, or Visit
iducc.com for e-mail notification information.
12 DRAFT Tradewinds/MPP-12-015iMM-12-012
3) Revisions: The developer is responsible to provide utilities with any revisions to preliminary
plans. Utilities may request an updated plan review meeting if revisions are made in the
preliminary plans which affect the utility relocation requirements. Utilities shall have thirty days
after receiving the revisions to review and comment thereon.
Develo ment Process Checklist
XSubmit a development application to a City or to Ada County
SThe City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD
XThe ACHD Planning Review Section will receive the development application to review
XThe Planning Review Section will do 9!C of the following:
XSend a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific conditions of approval at
this time.
Xwrite a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and
evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
Xwrite a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system
and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
Items to be completed bv ADDlicant:
EFor ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" letter:
. The applicant should submit one set oi engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development
Review Section for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements
required by ACHD, then architeclural plans may be submitted for purposes
of impact fee assessment.)
. The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHD) for
ANI: work in the right-of-
way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts.
EPay lmpact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. lmpact fees cannot be
paid prior to plan review approval.
DID YOU REMEMBER:
Co n structi o n (N on - S u b di vi sion s)
E Driveway or Property Approach(s)
. Submit a "Driveway Approach Request'form to ACHD Construction (for approval by Development Services & Traffic
Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval.
E Working in the ACHD Right-of-Way
. Four business days prior to startjng work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary
Highway Use Permit
Application" to ACHD Construction - Permits along
a) b)Plan Tratfic An Erosion Control & Sediment Control Narrative wath: & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or
you
are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt.
Co n structio n ( S ub div i s i on s)
E Sediment & Erosion Submittal
. At least one week prior to setting up a Pre-Construction Meeting an Erosion
& Sediment Control Narrative & Plan,
done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be tumed into ACHD Construction to be reviewed and approved by the ACHD
Stormwater Section.
E ldaho Power Company
. Vic Steelman at ldaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior
to Pre-Con being
scheduled.
D Final Approval from Development Services is required prior to scheduling a
pre-Con.
13 DRAFTTradewinds/MPP-12-015/MAZ-12-012
Items Completed to Date:
1
Request for Appeal of Staff Decision
Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant
of the final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS
Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts
presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and
capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual.
Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be
charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative
costs.
b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with
the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working
days from the date of the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of
appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name,
address and telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The
grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy relevant
to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a written
argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice
of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection.
c. Time to Reply: The ROWDS lvlanager shall have ten (10) working days from the
date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and
may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may
also consider and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the
reply and any modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the
appellant prior to the Commission hearing on the appeal.
d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of
the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular
meeting to be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant
of the ROWDS Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision
being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the
Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing.
Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm
oT reverse, jn whole or part,
or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the
decision being appealedr as such action is adequately supported by the law and
evidence presented at the hearing.
a
e
14 DRAFT Tradewinds/MPP-'12-01s/MAZ-12-0i2
Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action
Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action: A Commissioner, a member of ACHD
staff or any other person objecting to any final action taken by the Commission may request
reconsideration of that action, provided the request is not for a reconsideration of an action
previously requested to be reconsidered, an action whose provisions have been partly and
materially carried out, or an action that has created a contractual relationship with third parties.
Only a Commission member who voted with the prevailing side can move for
reconsideration, but the motion may be seconded by any Commissioner and is voted on
by all Commissioners present.
lf a motion to reconsider is made and seconded it is subject to a motion to postpone to a
certain time.
c. The request for reconsideration must be supported by written documentation setting
forth new facts and information not presented at the earlier meeting, or a changed
situation that has developed since the taking of the earlier vote, or information
establishing an error of fact or law in the earlier action. The request may also be
supported by oral testimony at the meeting.
d. lf a motion to reconsider passes, the effect is the original matter is in the exact position
it
occupied the moment before it was voted on originally. lt will normally be returned to
ACHD staff for further review. The Commission may set the date of the meeting at
which the matter is to be returned. The Commission shall only take action on the
original matter at a meeting where the agenda notice so provides.
e At the meeting where the original matter is again on the agenda for Commission action,
interested persons and ACHD staff may present such written and oral testimony as the
President of the Commission determines to be appropriate, and the Commission may
take any action the majority of the Commissjon deems advisable.
f. lf a motion to reconsider passes, the applicant may be charged a reasonable fee, to
cover administrative costs, as established by the Commission.
a
'15 DRAFTTradewinds/MPP-12-015/MM-12-012
1.
b. The request must be in writing and delivered to the Secretary of the Highway District no
later than 3:00 p.m. on the day prior to the Commission's nelit scheduled regular
meeting following the meeting at which the action to be reconsidered was taken. Upon
receipt of the request, the Secretary shail cause the same to be placed on the agenda
for that next scheduled regular Commission meeting.
TO
ATTN
ADDRESS
RE
City of Meridian
Sonya Watters
33 East Broadway Avenue
Meridian, lD 83642
Tradewinds Subdivision
DATE:
JOB #:
FROM:
TRANSMITTAL
LO/24/2OL2
t2-o72
Kevin McCarthy, P.E.
ENGINEERING
Please find attached
Transmitted By
COPIES DATE PAGES DESCRIPTION
13 LO.24.L2 5 Revised Preliminary Plat, Conceptual Engineering Plans, & Landscape Plan
L 1o.24.L2 L 8.5 x 11 Exhlbit Depicting Common Driveway Lot lnformation
L LO.24.t2 Disc Containing Electronic Documents
I Hand Delivery
I submittat Exchange
Transmittal Purpose
E wait
! electronic Transfer
! rax
fleict<-up
! ror Your Use
I As Requested
Remarks
I ror Review & Approval
I other:
! for Signature
CC Signed: Kevin McCarthy, P.E., Principal Engineer
lf enclosures are not as indicated, please notify us as soon as possible.
9233WESTSTATESTREET I BOISE, \D83774 I 208.639.6939 I FAX208.639.6930 | www.kmengltp.com
Item #9C, D: Tradewinds Subdivision llz-12-012t Pp.12.015)
Application(s):
> ;Zoning Preliminary Annexation Plat &
Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of
'10.42 acres, is currenlly zoned RUT in Ada
County, and is located on the SEC of S. Locust Grove Road & E. Victory Road.
Summary of Request: The applicant requests annexation & zoning approval of
'10.42 acres of land with an R-8
zoning district. The proposed zoning is consistent with the FLUM designation of MDR for this site which anticipates
residential densities between 3 and 8 d.u./acre. The proposed density of 3.74 d.u./acre is consistent with the MDR
designation.
A preliminary plat is also proposed that consists of 39 building lots for
single{amily detached residential homes & 3
common area lots. The plat is proposed to develop in 2
phases.
Access to the site if proposed via S, Locust Grove Road; A stub street is shown at the east boundary for future
extension.
Open space & site amenities are proposed on the site in accord with UDC standards.
'10.3% open space is proposed
consisting of open space, parkways, & street buffers along Victory & Locust Grove, A %
basketball court is proposed
as an amenity, The applicant has also agreed to construct a pathway connection from Fathom Drive to Victory
Road
across Lot 16, Block 1.
Conceptual building elevations for the residential homes were submitted. To ensure the site develops as proposed,
staff is recommending a development agreement as a provision of annexation. The DA includes a
provision for future
development to comply with the preliminary plat, landscape plan, and conceptual building
elevations submitted with
this application.
The Commission recommended a provision be added to the DA for cross-access to be
provided to the property to the
south owned by the City where the future water tank is proposed to reduce access points
via Locust Grove Road, an
arterial street, as required by UDC 11-3A-3.
Commission Recommendation: Approval
Summary of Commission Public Hearing:
r. ln favor: Kevin McCarthy
ii. ln opposition: None
iii. Commenting: None
iv. Written testimony: Kristen Thompson, Kevin lVcCarthy
Key lssue(ii i. s) The The of Discussion timing allowance for construction for by asphalt Commission:(a-ofthe s alemporary sidewalks material) along Locust instead Grove ofconcrete &
Victory iidewalks Roads; along
Victory &
Locust Grove Roads where the intersection improvements are planned.
Key Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation:
t
staff requested that a conditron of approval be added that requires cross-access be
provided to the
property-owned by the City to the south (see Exhibit
B, conditions #1.1.1b and 1 .2.8j.
ln lieu of a concrete sidewalk along victory & Locust Grove Roads in the area where
the intersection
improrrements are pranned, the commission agreed
that asphart is an acceptabre temporary materiar
(see Exhibit B, condition #1.3.6).
At staffs request & the appricant's agreement, add a condition requrring
a pathway to be conshucted
from Fathom-Drive to Victory Road across Lot 16, Brock
'r
Outstanding lssue(s) for City Council: None
Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: None
Notes (
t-
6cr^r,lq-rn.- Lar"t^Aa-
e-
dLo k-ble t C r tt 2f aLC c-c It
oq't dr.. ,n./,Ll 'h TrottS't -11^- o,
a-
ro v t',/u' a,t ots
t'tt.> 04
q.Cc?rt
A, H..
o, L /bc<-l
4 Co"--,|'r
off hL""|
cIo'? t)
+_f
,cL-,1 /o,o(
aJ
City of Meridian Development Review
Agency Comments Meeting
Date: Date of List: sJr., I st
Planner:
Project Name: -fra.l,p,^r;"J
r
Fire sentative
Notes:
A B C D
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 o) 10 11 12 6- ,14 15 16 t7 19 20
21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 J+ 35 36 tt 38 39
41 42, 43 44 45 46 47 48 49
Notes:
tative:
A B D E
7l 72 73 74 76 77 78
Sani
Notes:
Services entative:
A B
1 2 3
Parks tative:
6 46 47 79 80 8l 82 83 84 85
Notes:
A,
Public Works sentative:
Notes:
1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 t2 13 15 l6 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Rev. 6/6/ I 2
18
22 40
fI m
---t-t IT
Lft
Police
C
75 m m
Ir r
C
97 98
7 14 ---t-t [T_l
Sonya Watters
Sent:
bject:
To
Cc
Su
From
Kevin,
Please see the email bellow
Thank you
Scott Steckline
Scott Steckline
Wednesday, November 14,2012 9:45 AM
kevin@kmengllp.com
Sonya Watters
FW: Tradewinds Sub AZ; PP Staff Report for 11115 P&Z Mtg
From: Kyle Radek
Sent: Friday, November 09,207210:14 AM
To: Scott Steckline
Subject: RE: Tradewinds Sub AZ; PP Staff Report for 11/15 P&Z Mtg
Scott,
The City can pay for the upsizing
Kyle Radek, PE, CFM
Assistant City Engineer
Meridian Public Works
From: Scott Steckline
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2072 9:30 AM
To: Kyle Radek
Subject: FW: Tradewinds Sub AZ; PP Staff Report for 11/15 P&Z Mtg
Kyle,
Please read the emailbellow. Willthe city be paying forthe upsizing of the water line orwill it be the responsibility of
the developer. This is for the new development north of our new water tank Victory and Locust grove.
Scott
From: Sonya Watters
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 20t2 4:33 PM
To: Kevin McCarthy
Cc: 'Don Newell'; 'Kirsti Allphin'; Scott Steckline
Subject: RE: Tradewinds Sub M; pp
Staff Report for 11/15 p&Z
Mtg
Kevin,
lhave no idea what the reason is...l'tI forward your emaiI to Scott Stecktine for his response.
Thanks
Sonya
1
Fr6m: Kevin McCarthy tmailto:kevin@kmeng l
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 20122:33 PM
To: Sonya Watters; Machelle Hill; Jacy Jones; Jaycee Holman
Cc: 'Don Newell'; 'KirstiAllphin'
Subject: RE: Tradewinds Sub M; PP Staff Report for 11/15 P&Z Mtg
Sonya,
At this point we have one question. ln the Public Works Department Section item 2.2 it says - "...The
opplicont sholl be
responsible to upsize the woter moin to twelve inch from Coastline Drive, Starboard St and Fathom Dr to Victory
Rood...". l'm assuming our development would only need an 8" line and the need for this is associated with the tank
planned on the adjacent property, so will the City be paying for the material cost associated with upsizing the pipe from
8" to 12"?
Thanks,
Kevin McCarthy
208.639.6939
From : Sonya Watters [mailto : swatters@meridiancitv.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 B:57 AM
To: Machelle Hill; Jacy Jones; Jaycee Holman
Cc: Kevin McCadhy
Subject: Tradewinds Sub AZ; PP Staff Report for 11/15 P&Z Mtg
Attached is the staff report for the proposed Annexation & Zoning and Pretiminary Ptat for Tradewinds
Subdivision. This item is scheduted to be on the Commission agenda on November 15th. The pubtic hearing
witt be hetd at City Ha[t, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, beginning at 7:00 pm. Ptease catl or e-mail with any
questions.
Kevin - Ptease submit any written response you may have to the staff report to the City Cterk's office
(ihotman@meridiancitv.ore, mhitl@meridiancitv.ore, and iiones@meridiancitv.ors) and mysetf (e-maiI or
fax) as soon as possibte.
Thanks,
s)wua watlteYs
Associate City Planner
CITY OF MERIDIAN
Community Development Department
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Ste. I 02
Meridian, lD 83642
208-884-5533 phone / 208-888-6854 fax
2
Sonya Watters
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Mindy Wallace IMwallace@achdidaho.org]
Tuesday, October 23,2012 10:31 AM
Sonya Watters
RE: Roundabout - Victory and Locust Grove
ACHD will construct sidewalks as part of our intersection project.
From : Sonya Watters I ma ilto : swatters@ merid ia ncity. org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23,2012 10:06 AM
To: Mindy Wallace
Subject: RE: Roundabout - Victory and Locust Grove
So am I understanding you right, ACHD witl not be constructing sidewalks with the RAB project adjacent to the RAB?
From : Mindy Wallace Imailto: Mwallace@achdidaho.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23,2072 B:37 AM
To: Kevin McCarthy
Cc: Sonya Watters
Subject: RE: Roundabout - Victory and Locust Grove
Kevin,
TheRABisscheduledtobeinstalledbetween2OlTand202l. ThisinformationcanbefoundonACHD'swebsite. ACHD
will recommend pavement widening in lieu of sidewalks within the influence area of the RAB when one is planned to be
constructed. The lead agency can always be more restrictive and require the construction of sidewalks.
Mindy
Mindy Wallace
Planning Review Supervisor
Ada County Highway District
(208) 387-6178
"We drive quality transportation for allAda County -- Anytime...Anywhere!"
From : Kevin McCarthy [ma ilto: kevin
@kmengllp.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22,2072 5:11 PM
To: Mindy Wallace
Cc:'Don Newell'
Subject: RE: Roundabout - Victory and Locust Grove
Mindy,
We turned in our preliminary plat to the City of Meridian for our project
at Victory and Locust Grove. I left you a phone
message about it while you were out last week. The City had the following comment:
1
' . Detached sidewatks are required to be provided atong Victory & Locust Grove within a pubtic use easement
from the point where ACHD's improvements associated with the intersection end. Find out when the
roundabout is going to be constructed.
ln our conversation over a month ago you indicated ACHD would not be in favor of installing sidewalk along and Victory
and Locust Grove, since it would need to be removed to construct the roundabout. Based on this comment I don't think
the City has an issue with that, but would like to see us install the sidewalk from where your improvements would end.
Do you know where that would be? Also, do you know when the roundabout is planned at this intersection?
Thanks for your help on this one. Please give me a call ifyouhaveanyquestions.
Kevin Mccarthy
208.639.6939
2
Barbara Shiffer
From:
Sent:
Subject
Machelle Hill
Thursday, October 25, 2012 1'l :32 AM
FW: City of Meridian Dev App - Tradewinds Subdivision AZPP
From: Machelle Hill
Sent: Thursday, October 25,20L2 11:31 AM
Subject: City of Meridian Dev App - Tradewinds Subdivision M PP
i
IDAHS
City of Meridian
City Clerk's Office
33 E. Broadway Avenue
Meridian,ID 83642
Planning und Zoning Commission
Developmenl Application Transmittal
To: Cifv Departments Comments due by: November 8,2012
Transmittal Date: October 25,
2012
File No.: AZt2-012 &PP t2-015
Hearing Date: November 15,2012
Request: Public Hearing - Annexation and Zoning of
10.42 acres of land to the R-8 zoning
district AND Preliminary Plat approval consisting of 39 building lots and 3
common/other lots on 9.11 acres of land in a proposed R-8 zoning district for
Tradewinds Subdivision
By: SDN, LLC
Location of Properfy or Project: Southeast corner of E. Victory Road and S. Locust Grove
Road
The City of Meridian is requesting comments and recommendations on the application referenced above. To review
detailed information about the request, please click on the file number above to take you directly to the application.
We request that you submit your comments or recommendations by date specified above. When responding, please
reference the file number of the project. lf responding by email, please send comments to clerk@meridianciiy.orq.
For additional information associated with this application please contact City Clerk's Office at number below.
Thank you,
Machelle Hill
Meridian City Clerk's Office
33 E. Broadway Avenue
Meridian, lD 83642
(208)8884433
m h ill@meridiancitv. oro
1
lsee rihioit"e, conditio; #1.2.9).
feo1119
atl,9t1ne-sidewark arong Locust Grove & Victory Roads to oe constructed
(condition #1.2.10). with phase 1
L
lt.
I
II
i
I
I
ri t lo"
,A
iiii
li. r{!
t
t
FIE
lt
fr
ir
ll
I
t
.p{.&e
'-=:>--r
!iEs
L J
l
r----
---- -J
i!!:
't
I
_l
-J
--l
I
I
T-----1
i ;!!: i
I
J I
i-ry1i
t ;:! !
LI
I
I
J iEEr
T
I
I
L
T
I
I FEEC
I
I
-J
I ;:!:
I
L- l
Iri !it--
E!!
I
)
11 DRAFTTradewinds/MPP-12-015IMAZ-12-012
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:=.#-4.
T-,-"- -l
, !tR! --
.l
I
I cr"'
&l., .l --::--r
______
Better
than "D"
) Residential subdivision trees
> A@onopenspace
) Number of trees provided on common lot(s)
a
a
a
x a Proposed common area lots and/or landscape easements