Loading...
Excalibur Metal Design H-2018-0139 CUPCITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). H-2018-0139 Page 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of the Request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct an approximately 10,980 square-foot light industry facility, located at 1322 E. Watertower St. in the C-G Zoning District, by Hatch Design Architecture. Case No(s). H-2018-0139 For the Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing Date of: February 7, 2019 (Findings on February 21, 2019) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 7, 2019, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 7, 2019, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 7, 2019, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 7, 2019, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the “Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,” codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted April 19, 2011, Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this decision, which shall be signed by the Chairman of the Commission and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 21, 2019 – Page 50 of 202 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). H-2018-0139 Page 2 upon the applicant, the Planning Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the conditions of approval in the attached staff report for the hearing date of February 7, 2019, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the Planning & Zoning Commission’s authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11- 5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant’s request for conditional use permit is hereby approved in accord with the conditions of approval in the staff report for the hearing date of February 7, 2019, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Two (2) Year Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit, when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two (2) years unless otherwise approved by the City in accord with UDC 11-5B-6F.1. During this time, the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting, the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two (2) year period in accord with UDC 11-5B-6F.2. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-5B-6.F.1, the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one (1) two (2) year period. Additional time extensions up to two (2) years as determined and approved by the Commission may be granted. With all extensions, the Director or Commission may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, a denial of a conditional use permit entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff report for the hearing date of February 7, 2019 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 21, 2019 – Page 51 of 202 action of the Planning & Zoning Commission at its regular meeting held on the day of V, 2019. COMMISSIONER JESSICA PERREAULT, CHAIRMAN VOTED COMMISSIONER RYAN FITZGERALD, VICE CHAIRMAN VOTED COMMISSIONER ANDREW SEAL VOTED COMMISSIONER LISA HOLLAND VOTED _e COMMISSIONER WILLIAM CASSINELLI VOTED COMMISSIONER REID OLSEN VOTED ()PA All Je ca I e-66aKlt, Chairman pRRTED AC/G.�s , Attest: �`"r ►'[ � r��� °r a w Foy m jDjAN� C.Jaoles .k 2�F SEqL y C Copy served upon the Applicant, the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and the City Attorney. (;?- By: Dated: City Cle • Office 2— z/ -/ 5 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). H-2018-0139 Page 3 EXHIBIT A Page 1 HEARING DATE: 2/7/2019 TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Stephanie Leonard, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2018-0139 Excalibur Metal Design LOCATION: 1322 E. Watertower St. (NE ¼ of Section 18, Township 3N., Range 1E.) I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A conditional use permit is requested for an approximately 10,980 square foot, two-story, light industrial facility on 0.83 acres of land in the C-G zoning district as required by UDC Table 11-2B-2. The proposed light industrial facility will be used for employee offices, production and warehouse space and a showroom for a metal design company (Excalibur Metal Design). II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Description Details Page Acreage 0.83 Future Land Use Designation Commercial Existing Land Use Undeveloped Proposed Land Use(s) Light industrial (metal design facility) Current Zoning C-G Proposed Zoning C-G Neighborhood meeting date; # of attendees: November 6, 2018; 1 attendee History (previous approvals) AZ 00-005; MDA 10-007 (DA Inst. No. 100040596); RZ-02- 004 (rezoned C-G from R-8) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 21, 2019 – Page 53 of 202 EXHIBIT A Page 2 B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District  Staff report (yes/no) No  Requires ACHD Commission Action (yes/no) Access (Arterial/Collectors/State Hwy/Local)(Existing and Proposed) 1 access proposed via E. Watertower St. (collector) 1 access proposed via S. Adkins Way (local) Traffic Level of Service Stub Street/Interconnectivity/Cross Access Existing Road Network Existing Arterial Sidewalks / Buffers Attached sidewalk existing along E. Watertower St. and S. Adkins St. Proposed Road Improvements Distance to other key services Wastewater  Distance to Sewer Services 0 ft.  Sewer Shed Five Mile Trunkshed  Estimated Project Sewer ERU’s See Application Info.  WRRF Declining Balance 13.52 MGD  Project Consistent with WW Master Plan/Facility Plan Yes Water  Distance to Water Services 0 ft.  Pressure Zone 3  Estimated Project Water ERU’s See application info.  Water Quality None  Project Consistent with Water Master Plan Yes  Impacts/Concerns Applicant to coordinate with Engineering regarding fire flow requirements beyond 1500 gpm Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 21, 2019 – Page 54 of 202 EXHIBIT A Page 3 C. Project Area Maps III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Representative: Jeff Hatch, Hatch Design Architecture 6126 W. State St. Ste. 107 Boise, Idaho 83703 B. Owner: Jeremy Adams 75 W. Taylor Ave. Ste. 200 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Planned Development Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 21, 2019 – Page 55 of 202 EXHIBIT A Page 4 IV. NOTICING Planning & Zoning Posting Date City Council Posting Date Newspaper Notification 1/18/2019 Radius notification mailed to properties within 300 feet 1/15/2019 Public hearing notice sign posted 1/25/2019 Nextdoor posting 1/15/2019 V. STAFF ANALYSIS The applicant requests a conditional use permit to operate a light industrial use (metal design facility), in the C-G zoning district as required by UDC Table 11-2B-2. A conditional use permit is required for a light industrial use, subject to specific use standards listed below. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designates this site as Commercial. The purpose of areas designated as Commercial is to provide a full range of commercial and retail to serve area residents and visitors. Uses may include retail, wholesale, service and office uses – the proposed light industrial facility will house a fabrication process intended to provide a unique service and product to customers. The facility is proposed to include a showroom and production areas where customers will be able to view the fabrication process and custom order wholesale or retail products. The proposed building will house a service bay intended to contain the majority of fabrication processes to mitigate sound and any industrial characteristics of the intended use. Since the proposed use is not exclusively industrial in character, incorporates various aspects that contribute to a retail and service atmosphere, and has been designed with surrounding properties and uses in mind, staff feels the proposed CUP would be consistent with the intent of commercially zoned properties. The applicant is also requesting alternative compliance (ALT) to UDC 11-3B to install trees in grates within pavers in lieu of the vegetative groundcover that is required in the 20-foot landscape buffer along E. Watertower St. The alternative compliance request only requires approval by the Director, consistent with Meridian City Code Title 11, Chapter 5; analysis regarding the request can be found in Section I below. A. Comprehensive Plan Policies (https://www.meridiancity.org/compplan):  “Require all commercial and industrial businesses to install and maintain landscaping.” (2.01.03B)  “Require all new and reconstructed parking lots to provide landscaping in internal islands and along streets, and to positively influence the physical and visual environment through screening, paving materials, and other landscape techniques.” (2.01.04B)  “Provide landscaping, pedestrian friendly areas, and appropriate signage at gateways, and new development sites throughout town as appropriate, with upscale attractive construction.” (2.01.03J)  “Require industrial areas to create a site design compatible with surrounding uses (e.g., landscape, fences, etc.) and community design criteria.” (3.06.01A) B. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3): The proposed use is subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-25, Industry, Light and Heavy. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 21, 2019 – Page 56 of 202 EXHIBIT A Page 5 A. All mechanical equipment emissions; shipping and/or delivery; or other outdoor activity areas shall be located a minimum of three hundred feet (300') from any abutting residential districts, or the use is subject to a conditional use permit. The proposed use does not abut a residential district so this requirement is not applicable. B. The application shall identify how the proposed use will address the impacts of noise and other emissions on adjoining residential districts. More specifically, the following adverse effects shall be mitigated through setbacks, buffers, sound attenuation and/or hours of operation: 1. Noise, odor, or vibrations, or direct or reflected glare detectable by the human senses without the aid of instruments. The service bay for the proposed light industrial use (metal fabrication) will be housed in the northwest part of the building, located furthest away from the patio area and closest to adjacent industrial and commercial uses. 2. Radioactivity and electric or electromagnetic disturbances that unduly interfere with the normal operation of equipment, instruments, or appliances on abutting properties. This standard is not applicable to the proposed use. 3. Any other emission or radiation that endangers human health, results in damages to vegetation or property or which exceeds health and safety standards. This standard is not applicable to the proposed use. 4. In the event that the director determines that the applicant cannot adequately address such impacts, the use shall be subject to conditional use approval. C. Additional standards for industry, heavy: The use shall be located a minimum of one thousand feet (1,000') from a hospital. The proposed building is not located near a hospital so this requirement is not applicable. D. The application materials shall include written statement that the proposed facility meets any applicable federal, state, or local standards regarding such use including, but not limited to, those of the U.S. environmental protection agency, the U.S. department of agriculture, Central district health department, the Ada County air quality board and Idaho department of water resources. (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005). The applicant has not submitted these required materials with the subject application but shall submit information regarding the specific use standards in the narrative for the CZC and DES application. C. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): See UDC Table 11-2B-3 (Dimensional Standards in the Commercial Districts) D. Access (UDC 11-3A-3, 11-3H-4): One (1) access is proposed via E. Watertower St. (collector) and one (1) access is proposed via S. Adkins Way (local). Per UDC 11-3A-3 staff typically recommends that properties provide a cross-access/egress easement to abutting properties to limit the number of access points to collector roadways (Watertower) and to allow for inner-connectivity should redevelopment occur in the future. However, this site is proposed to include an accessory outdoor storage use which will abut an industrial property to the north. In this case, staff does not believe cross-access is practical and would cause the currently proposed project to change in character and design; specifically impacting the location of the storage yard and parking for the site. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 21, 2019 – Page 57 of 202 EXHIBIT A Page 6 E. Parking (UDC 11-3C): Per UDC Table 11-3C-6B.1, a minimum of 22 off-street parking spaces are required to be provided; a total of 21 spaces are proposed. One (1) additional parking space complying with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-5 shall be provided. F. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): Seven-foot sidewalks exist along E. Watertower St. and S. Adkins Way. The applicant is proposing an outdoor paved patio that will continue to the existing sidewalk along both streets; a walkway leads from the patio to the front entrance of the facility. G. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): A ten-foot wide street buffer is required along S. Adkins Rd. and a twenty-foot wide street buffer is required along E. Watertower St. as set forth in UDC Table 11-2B-3. All street buffers are required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. The applicant is proposing a fifteen-foot buffer along S. Adkins Rd. in excess of UDC standards and is submitting an alternative compliance request for the buffer along E. Watertower St. as detailed in item I below. Parking lot landscaping is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C and in accord with Comprehensive Plan action item #2.01.04B, “Require all new and reconstructed parking lots to provide landscaping in internal islands and along streets, and to positively influence the physical and visual environment through screening, paving materials, and other landscape techniques.” The plan as submitted complies with these requirements. There are no existing trees on the site being removed that require mitigation. H. Alternative Compliance (ALT) (UDC 11-5B-5): The applicant has applied for Alternative Compliance as set forth in UDC 11-5B-5 to landscaping requirements (UDC 11-3B) regarding the required 20-foot landscape buffer along E. Watertower St. (collector). UDC 11-3B-7C-3a requires that all required landscape buffers along streets be planted with trees and shrubs, lawn, or other vegetative groundcover. The applicant proposes to install three (3) deciduous trees within grates bounded by pavers spanning approximately 85 linear feet. The tree grates border a patio area that is intended to serve as a pedestrian and employee gathering space (see Exhibit VII.B). Staff feels the applicant is proposing an alternative that incorporates an architectural site design that will promote a walkable and pedestrian oriented site and as such, meets one of the prerequisites for alternative compliance and provides an equal or superior means for meeting the requirements of UDC 11-3B (see Findings in Section IX). The alternative also fulfills the intent of Comprehensive Plan action item #2.01.03J, “Provide landscaping, pedestrian friendly areas, and appropriate signage at gateways, and new development sites throughout town as appropriate, with upscale attractive construction.” Staff is generally supportive of the alternative compliance request, however is recommending the applicant provide further information regarding the walkable and pedestrian oriented details to demonstrate the fulfillment of alternative compliance. Staff is recommending the applicant embellish on the following with the CZC and DES application: Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 21, 2019 – Page 58 of 202 EXHIBIT A Page 7 a. The proposed site and landscape plan depicts a patio area but does not include information about potential seating options, pedestrian scale elements, or the type of pavers used. Staff recommends the applicant provide a detail of the patio, including an area for customers and/or employees to utilize the space with the CZC and DES application submittal. b. The applicant’s narrative and site and landscape plan depict the area in which the trees with grates will be located but does not provide information about the style or appearance of grate proposed, or the appearance of pavers and whether those pavers continue into the proposed patio area. Staff recommends the applicant provide more information and a detail of the buffer area with a rendering of pavers and tree grates with the CZC and DES application submittal. I. Outdoor Storage as an Accessory Use (UDC 11-3A-14) Outdoor storage of material, equipment, inventory, and/or supplies shall be incorporated into the overall design of the proposed building and site landscaping to minimize the visual impacts of the use. Outdoor storage shall be fully contained and screened from view of adjacent properties and/or public streets by a solid fence and/or wall with a minimum height of six feet (6’). The applicant is proposing to use the northern part of the site as secured accessory outdoor storage, but has not specified what type of fencing will be used for the secured gate or for screening to adjacent properties. The existing fencing at the northern boundary appears to be chainlink and does not qualify as a screening material. There does not appear to be fencing along the west boundary of the site, which will need to be screened if used as an accessory outdoor storage area. A detail of required proposed solid fencing along the north and west boundary of the site shall be submitted with the CZC and DES application. J. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7, 11-3A-14) Fencing proposed along the perimeter of the site shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7 and UDC 11-3A-14. In accord with UDC 11-3A-14, proposed fencing and/or wall shall be constructed of complementary or of similar design and materials of the primary structure. A detail of proposed fencing shall be submitted with the CZC and DES application. K. Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted and approved prior to submittal of a building permit application. The proposed plans submitted with these applications should comply with UDC standards and the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual for commercial districts. L. Building Elevations (UDC 11-3A-19 | Architectural Standards Manual): The applicant has submitted conceptual elevations of the proposed building included in Exhibit VII.C. Building materials consist of metal siding, sheet metal, a perforated metal accent screen, and a steel entry and awning. The Architectural Standards Manual (ASM) for commercial districts requires that building design incorporate complementary material combinations, including: the use of at least two (2) distinct field materials, colors, or material-color combinations on the building façade; incorporation of an accent material on the first story; and distinguishing field materials from accent materials. The submitted conceptual elevations depict one field material (metal) in varying applications. Staff recommends the applicant revise the building elevations to comply with the design standards in UDC 11-3A-19 and the ASM. The elevations submitted with the application (Exhibit VII.C) are not approved with the subject application. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 21, 2019 – Page 59 of 202 EXHIBIT A Page 8 M. Trash Enclosure A trash enclosure is depicted on the site plan in the northern part of the parking lot and is proposed to be located within the secured parking portion of the site. A detail of the sides of the enclosure should be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. The applicant shall coordinate with Republic Services on the design and location of the trash enclosure and shall develop an access plan for the enclosure. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff finds the proposed project complies with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan and is conditioned to comply with the applicable development standards in the UDC. Based on the aforementioned analysis, staff recommends approval of the subject CUP application. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission heard this item on February 7, 2019. At the public hearing, the Commission moved to approve the subject CUP request. a. Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Jeff Hatch, Hatch Design Architecture, Applicant’s Representative; Matt Schneider; Jeremy Adams, Owner; Sally Reynolds ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Jeff Hatch, Hatch Design Architecture, Applicant’s Representative; Matt Schneider; Jeremy Adams, Owner; Sally Reynolds iv. Written testimony: None v. Staff presenting application: Stephanie Leonard vi. Other staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons b. Key Issues of Public Testimony: i. None c. Key Issues of Discussion by Commission: i. Secured parking access, materials and refuse stored outside ii. Noise to abutting properties, hours of operation iii. Design of building and materials used for exterior elevations iv. Educational outreach for class visits or instruction d. Key Commission Changes to Staff Recommendation: i. Commission replaced condition VIII.1.g with a condition requiring applicant to coordinate a Design Standard Exception for building elevation materials with staff. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 21, 2019 – Page 60 of 202 EXHIBIT A Page 9 VII. EXHIBITS A. Site Plan (date: December 2018) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 21, 2019 – Page 61 of 202 EXHIBIT A Page 10 B. Landscape Plan (date: December 2018) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 21, 2019 – Page 62 of 202 EXHIBIT A Page 11 C. Building Elevations (date: December 2018) - NOT APPROVED Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 21, 2019 – Page 63 of 202 EXHIBIT A Page 12 VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS 1. PLANNING DIVISION a. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of previous approvals (AZ-00-005, 100040596; MDA-10-007; RZ-02-004). b. The applicant shall comply with the Specific Use Standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-25, Industry, Light and Heavy. c. The applicant shall comply with the Outdoor Storage as an Accessory Use standards in UDC 11-3A-14. d. The site plan, included in Exhibit VII.A, dated December 2018 shall be revised as follows: i. One (1) parking space shall be added to the site plan to comply with standards in UDC Table 11-3C-6B.1 e. The landscape plan included in Exhibit VII.B, dated December 2018, shall be revised as follows: i. The applicant shall provide details of the proposed tree grates and patio area with submittal of CZC and DES application. ii. A detail of the sides of the trash enclosure shall be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. iii. A detail of any fencing and secure gate proposed shall be submitted with the CZC and DES application. iv. One (1) parking space shall be added to the site plan to comply with standards in UDC Table 11-3C-6B.1. f. Development of this site shall substantially comply with the site plan and landscape plan included in Exhibit VII and the conditions of approval in this report. g. The applicant shall revise the building elevations to incorporate at least two (2) field materials from the basic categories specified in the ASM for commercial districts (wood, masonry, concrete, metal, stucco and glazing). Coordinate with staff on a Design Standard Exemption for building elevation materials. The request shall be made in writing and submitted with the CZC and DES application. The request shall specify the standard(s) proposed to be exempt; the reason the exemption is requested; and how the alternative means for compliance meet the intent and goals of the requested standard exemption, or how the alterative proposed to maintain a similar level of effort by exceeding other site and building standards. h. The applicant is required to submit a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) and Administrative Design Review (DES) application to the Planning Division for approval of the proposed use and final site layout and building designs prior to submittal of a building permit application. i. The applicant shall submit information regarding the specific use standards in UDC 11-4-3-25 in the narrative for the CZC and DES application. j. The proposed site layout and structures are required to comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and the guidelines contained in the Architectural Standards Manual (ASM) for commercial districts. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 21, 2019 – Page 64 of 202 EXHIBIT A Page 13 k. Staff’s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms of the approved conditional use does not relieve the applicant of responsibility for compliance. l. The applicant shall have a maximum of two (2) years to commence the light industrial use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval listed above. If the use has not begun within two (2) years of approval, a new conditional use permit must be obtained prior to operation or a time extension must be requested in accord with UDC 11-5B-6F. m. The applicant shall complete all required improvements prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. It is unlawful to use or occupy any building or structure until the Building Official has issued a Certificate of Occupancy. n. The applicant shall comply with the outdoor lighting standards shown in UDC 11-3A-11. o. All signage for the property is subject to the standards set forth in UDC 11-3D. 2. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2.1 Site Specific Conditions of Approval 2.1.1 Sanitary sewer and water mains/services are currently available on the subject site. The applicant shall be responsible for the abandonment, per Meridian City standards, of any existing mainlines or services that are not utilized. 2.1.2 At least 1,500 gpm of domestic water supply is available at 20 psi at the water main. Applicant to coordinate with Public Works Engineering if a higher flow is required. 2.2 General Conditions of Approval 2.2.1 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. 2.2.2 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.2.3 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.2.4 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.2.5 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.2.6 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.2.7 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 3. NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT (NMID) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/160521/Page1.aspx 4. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (DEQ) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/160483/Page1.aspx Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 21, 2019 – Page 65 of 202 EXHIBIT A Page 14 IX. FINDINGS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: The Commission shall base its determination on the conditional use permit request on the following: a. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located. Staff finds that the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet the dimensional and development regulations of the C-G zoning district and the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-25, Industry, Light and Heavy. b. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accord with the requirements of this Title. Staff finds that the proposed use is consistent and harmonious with the UDC and Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designation of Commercial for this site. c. That the design, construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area. Staff finds that the general construction, operation and maintenance of the light industrial facility institution should be compatible with the surrounding commercial uses in the vicinity. Staff feels that the applicant should provide revised elevations complying with the commercial standards in the Architectural Standards Manual to ensure the design of the building is cohesive with other uses in the general vicinity. Staff finds that the proposed project will be compatible with the existing and intended character of the area and will not adversely change the character thereof. d. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. Staff finds that the proposed development should not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. If approved, conditions of approval are included in Exhibit VIII of this staff report to ensure the proposed use will not adversely affect other properties in the vicinity. e. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, schools, parks, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer. Staff finds that sanitary sewer, domestic water, refuse disposal, and irrigation were provided to this property with development of the subdivision; services will be extended to the proposed building by the developer. Staff finds that the proposed use will be served adequately by all of the public facilities and services listed above. f. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. If approved, the applicant will be financing any improvements required for development. Staff finds there will not be excessive additional requirements at public cost and that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the community’s economic welfare. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 21, 2019 – Page 66 of 202 EXHIBIT A Page 15 g. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. Staff finds that the proposed development should not involve activities that will create nuisances that would be detrimental to the general welfare of the surrounding area. h. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. Staff finds that the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of any natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance in this area. Alternative Compliance Findings: In order to grant approval for alternative compliance, the Director shall determine the following findings: 1. Strict adherence or application of the requirements is not feasible; OR The Director finds that strict adherence or application of the requirements is feasible; however, the applicant desires to install a plaza and grated trees to provide a pedestrian oriented atmosphere. 2. The alternative compliance provides an equal or superior means for meeting the requirements; and The Director finds the alternative compliance provides an equal means for meeting the City’s structure and site design standards and the landscape standards for the following reasons: 1) The grated trees will allow for an attractive and pedestrian oriented alternative to the typically required vegetative buffer. Customers, employees and pedestrians will be able to enter the site through various access points where they can utilize the outdoor patio area before or after entering the facility. 2) The applicant has proposed to include a patio area for customers and employees, which will provide useable outdoor space in lieu of a vegetative landscape buffer. 3. The alternative means will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or impair the intended uses and character of the surrounding properties. The Director finds that the proposed alternative will not be detrimental to the public welfare or impair the use/character of the surrounding properties. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 21, 2019 – Page 67 of 202